Agenda packet — Solana Beach City Council, May 11, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda May 11, 2022 Page 1 of 7 AGENDA
Joint REGULAR Meeting
Wednesday, May 11, 2022 * 6:00 p.m.

City Hall / Council Chambers, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California  City Council meetings are video recorded and archived as a permanent record. The video recording captures the complete proceedings of the meeting and is available for viewing on the City's website.  Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time prior to meetings for processing new submittals. Complete records containing meeting handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request.

PUBLIC MEETING ACCESS
The Regular Meetings of the City Council are scheduled for the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays and are broadcast live. The video taping of meetings are maintained as a permanent record and contain a detailed account of the proceedings. Council meeting tapings are archived and available for viewing on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

WATCH THE MEETING
• Live web-streaming: Meetings web-stream live on the City’s website on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

Find the large Live Meeting button.
• Live Broadcast on Local Govt. Channel: Meetings are broadcast live on Cox Communications - Channel 19 / Spectrum (Time Warner)-Channel 24 / AT&T U-verse Channel 99. • Archived videos online: The video taping of meetings are maintained as a permanent record and contain a detailed account of the proceedings. Council meeting tapings are archived and available for viewing on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

AGENDA MATERIALS
A full City Council agenda packet including relative supporting documentation is available at City Hall, the Solana Beach Branch Library (157 Stevens Ave.), La Colonia Community Ctr., and online www.cityofsolanabeach.org.

Agendas are posted at least 72 hours prior to regular meetings and at least 24 hours prior to special meetings. Writings and documents regarding an agenda of an open session meeting, received after the official posting, and distributed to the Council for consideration, will be made available for public viewing at the same time. In addition, items received at least 1 hour 30 minutes prior to the meeting time will be uploaded online with the agenda posting. Materials submitted for consideration should be forwarded to the City Clerk’s department 858-720-2400. The designated location for viewing of hard copies is the City Clerk’s office at City Hall during normal business hours.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Written correspondence (supplemental items) regarding an agenda item at an open session meeting should be submitted to the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] with a) Subject line to include the meeting date b) Include the Agenda Item # as listed on the Agenda. o Correspondence received after the official posting of the agenda, but two hours prior to the meeting start time, on the meeting day, will be distributed to Council and made available online along with the agenda posting. All submittals received before the start of the meeting will be made part of the record. o Written submittals will be added to the record and not read out loud.

And/Or
Verbal Comment Participation:

Please submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk prior to the meeting, or the announcement of the Section/Item, to provide public comment. Allotted times for speaking are outlined on the speaker’s slip for each agenda section: Oral Communications, Consent, Public Hearings and Staff Reports.

Public speakers have 3 minutes each to speak on each topic. Time may be donated by another individual who is present at the meeting to allow an individual up to 6 minutes to speak. Group: Time may be donated

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

SOLANA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, & HOUSING AUTHORITY
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda May 11, 2022 Page 2 of 7 by two individuals who are present at the meeting allowing an individual up to 10 minutes to speak. Group Hearings: For public hearings only, time may be donated by two individuals who are present at the meeting allowing an individual up to 15 minutes to speak.

SPECIAL ASSISTANCE NEEDED
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons with a disability may request an agenda in appropriate alternative formats as required by Section 202. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s office (858) 720-2400 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

As a courtesy to all meeting attendees, please set cellular phones and pagers to silent mode and engage in conversations outside the Council Chambers.

CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
Lesa Heebner, Mayor
Kelly Harless, Deputy Mayor David A. Zito, Councilmember Jewel Edson, Councilmember Kristi Becker, Councilmember Gregory Wade
City Manager
Johanna Canlas
City Attorney
Angela Ivey
City Clerk
SPEAKERS:

Please submit your speaker slip to the City Clerk prior to the meeting or the announcement of the Item. Allotted times for speaking are outlined on the speaker’s slip for Oral Communications, Consent, Public Hearings and Staff Reports.

READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS:

Pursuant to Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 2.04.460, at the time of introduction or adoption of an ordinance or adoption of a resolution, the same shall not be read in full unless after the reading of the title, further reading is requested by a member of the Council. If any Councilmember so requests, the ordinance or resolution shall be read in full. In the absence of such a request, this section shall constitute a waiver by the council of such reading.

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:

CLOSED SESSION REPORT:

FLAG SALUTE:

APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

PROCLAMATIONS/CERTIFICATES: Ceremonial
Mental Health Awareness Month
PRESENTATIONS: Ceremonial items that do not contain in-depth discussion and no action/direction. “One Safe Place” North County Family Justice Center
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

Comments relating to items on this evening’s agenda are taken at the time the items are heard. This portion of the agenda provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items relating to City business and not appearing on today’s agenda by submitting a speaker slip Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda May 11, 2022 Page 3 of 7 (located on the back table) to the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action shall be taken by the City Council on public comment items. Council may refer items to the City Manager for placement on a future agenda. The maximum time allotted for each presentation is THREE MINUTES. No donations of time are permitted (SBMC 2.04.190). Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

COUNCIL COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENTARY:

An opportunity for City Council to make brief announcements or report on their activities. These items are not agendized for official City business with no action or substantive discussion.

A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Action Items) (A.1. - A.4)
Items listed on the Consent Calendar are to be acted in a single action of the City Council unless pulled for discussion. Any member of the public may address the City Council on an item of concern by submitting to the City Clerk a speaker slip (located on the back table) before the Consent Calendar is addressed. Those items removed from the Consent Calendar by a member of the Council will be trailed to the end of the agenda, while Consent Calendar items removed by the public will be heard immediately after approval of the Consent Calendar to hear the public speaker.

All speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for details.

Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

A.1. Minutes of the City Council.

Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Approve the Minutes of the City Council meetings held February 23, 2022.

Item A.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.2. Register Of Demands. (File 0300-30)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Ratify the list of demands for April 16, 2022 – April 29, 2022.

Item A.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.3. General Fund Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Changes. (File 0330-30) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Receive the report listing changes made to the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 General Fund Adopted Budget.

Item A.3. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.4. Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance and Video Inspection. (File 1040-48) Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda May 11, 2022 Page 4 of 7 Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-040:
a. Waiving the formal construction bid process because the Request for Proposals (RFP) process provides a more efficient, effective, and convenient method for hiring a sewer maintenance contractor that would provide the higher level of service required pursuant to Solana Beach Municipal Code section 3.08.140. b. Approving a Professional Services Agreement with Affordable Pipeline Service, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $501,710, in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/2023, for the Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance and Video Inspection services. c. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement on behalf of the City.
d. Authorizing the City Manager to extend the Agreement for up to four additional one-year terms, at the City’s option, at an amount not to exceed the amount identified and budgeted for in each subsequent year.

Item A.4. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

NOTE: The City Council shall not begin a new agenda item after 10:30 p.m. unless approved by a unanimous vote of all members present. (SBMC 2.04.070) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (B.1. – B.2.)
This portion of the agenda provides citizens an opportunity to express their views on a specific issue as required by law after proper noticing by submitting a speaker slip (located on the back table) to the City Clerk. After considering all of the evidence, including written materials and oral testimony, the City Council must make a decision supported by findings and the findings must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. An applicant or designee(s) for a private development/business project, for which the public hearing is being held, is allotted a total of fifteen minutes to speak, as per SBMC 2.04.210. A portion of the fifteen minutes may be saved to respond to those who speak in opposition. All other speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for time allotment. Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda May 11, 2022 Page 5 of 7 B.1. Public Hearing: 506 Pacific Ave., Applicant: Boyd, Application: DRP20- 014/SDP20-020. (File 0600-40)
The proposed project meets the minimum zoning requirements under the SBMC, may be found to be consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP.

Therefore, should the City Council be able to make the findings to approve the SDP, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2022-049 conditionally approving a DRP, SDP, and SDP Waiver to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement 2,986 square-foot, two-story single-family residence built above a 1,274 square-foot basement with an attached 448 square-foot two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 506 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach.

Item B.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

B.2. Public Hearing: 325 & 327 Pacific Ave., Applicant: Laughlin and Greenberg, Case: CUP/DRP 17-18-28. (File 0600-40)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. If Council can make the required findings, adopt Resolution 2022-048, approving the request for an 18 month Time Extension for approvals and entitlements in Case No. 17-18-28 and setting the expiration date on October 22, 2023.

Item B.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

C. STAFF REPORTS: (C.1. – C.3.)
Submit speaker slips to the City Clerk.

All speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for time allotments. Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

C.1. Santa Helena Neighborhood Trail Update. (File 0820-46) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Receive the report and provide input and direction on the Santa Helena Neighborhood Trail Project.

Item C.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda May 11, 2022 Page 6 of 7 C.2. Adopt (2nd Reading) Ordinance 523 - Regulating the Use, Sale and Distribution of Balloons filled with Gas Lighter than Air. (File 0220-70) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Ordinance 523 amending Title 5 and adding Chapter 5.07 to the Solana Beach Municipal Code to address the Use, Sale and Distribution of Balloons Filled with Gas Lighter than Air.

Item C.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

C.3. Adopt (2nd Reading) Ordinance 516 – Electronic Filing of Campaign Statements. (File 0430-50)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Ordinance 516 related to electronic campaign statements, adding Section

2.24.085 Electronic Filing of Campaign Statements to the Solana Beach Municipal Code.

Item C.3. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

WORK PLAN COMMENTS:

Adopted June 23, 2021
COMPENSATION & REIMBURSEMENT DISCLOSURE:

GC: Article 2.3. Compensation: 53232.3. (a) Reimbursable expenses shall include, but not be limited to, meals, lodging, and travel. 53232.3 (d) Members of a legislative body shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency “City” at the next regular meeting of the legislative body.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS: Council Committees
REGIONAL COMMITTEES: (outside agencies, appointed by this Council) a. City Selection Committee (meets twice a year) Primary-Heebner, Alternate-Edson b. Clean Energy Alliance (CEA) JPA: Primary-Becker, Alternate-Zito c. County Service Area 17: Primary- Harless, Alternate-Edson d. Escondido Creek Watershed Authority: Becker /Staff (no alternate). e. League of Ca. Cities’ San Diego County Executive Committee: Primary-Becker, Alternate- Harless. Subcommittees determined by its members. f. League of Ca. Cities’ Local Legislative Committee: Primary-Harless, Alternate-Becker g. League of Ca. Cities’ Coastal Cities Issues Group (CCIG): Primary-Becker, AlternateHarless h. North County Dispatch JPA: Primary-Harless, Alternate-Becker i. North County Transit District: Primary-Edson, Alternate-Harless j. Regional Solid Waste Association (RSWA): Primary-Harless, Alternate-Zito k. SANDAG: Primary-Heebner, 1st Alternate-Zito, 2nd Alternate-Edson. Subcommittees determined by its members.
l. SANDAG Shoreline Preservation Committee: Primary-Becker, Alternate-Zito m. San Dieguito River Valley JPA: Primary-Harless, Alternate-Becker Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda May 11, 2022 Page 7 of 7 n. San Elijo JPA: Primary-Zito, Primary-Becker, Alternate-City Manager o. 22nd Agricultural District Association Community Relations Committee: Primary-Edson, Primary-Heebner
STANDING COMMITTEES: (All Primary Members) (Permanent Committees) a. Business Liaison Committee – Zito, Edson.
b. Fire Dept. Management Governance & Organizational Evaluation – Harless, Edson c. Highway 101 / Cedros Ave. Development Committee – Edson, Heebner d. Parks and Recreation Committee – Zito, Harless
e. Public Arts Committee – Edson, Heebner
f. School Relations Committee – Becker, Harless
g. Solana Beach-Del Mar Relations Committee – Heebner, Edson

CITIZEN COMMISSION(S)
a. Climate Action Commission: Primary-Zito, Alternate-Becker ADJOURN:

Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting is May 25, 2022
Always refer to the City’s website Event Calendar for an updated schedule or contact City Hall. www.cityofsolanabeach.org 858-720-2400

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
§
I, Angela Ivey, City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach, do hereby certify that this Agenda for the May 11, 2022 Council Meeting was called by City Council, Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, Public Financing Authority, and the Housing Authority of the City of Solana Beach, California, was provided and posted on May 04, 2022 at 4:30 p.m. on the City Bulletin Board at the entrance to the City Council Chambers. Said meeting is held at 6:00 p.m., May 11, 2022, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California.

Angela Ivey, City Clerk
City of Solana Beach, CA
UPCOMING CITIZEN CITY COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS:

Regularly Scheduled, or Special Meetings that have been announced, are posted on each Citizen Commission’s Agenda webpage. See the Citizen Commission’s Agenda webpages or the City’s Events Calendar for updates. o Budget & Finance Commission
o Climate Action Commission
o Parks & Recreation Commission
o Public Arts Commission
o View Assessment Commission
}

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

SOLANA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY

MINUTES
Joint – Closed Session
Wednesday, February 23, 2022 ♦ 5:00 p.m.

Teleconference Location Only-City Hall/Council Chambers, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California This meeting will be conducted in accordance with Government Code sections 54953(e) and 54954.3 and other applicable law.

CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
Lesa Heebner, Mayor
Kelly Harless
Deputy Mayor
David A. Zito
Councilmember
District 1
Jewel Edson
Councilmember
District 3
Kristi Becker
Councilmember
Gregory Wade
City Manager
Johanna Canlas
City Attorney
Angela Ivey
City Clerk
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:

Mayor Heebner called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (ONLY): None
CLOSED SESSION:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Two (2) Potential cases.

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency
designated representative: Gregory Wade
Employee organizations: Miscellaneous Employees, Marine Safety Unit, Solana Beach Firefighter’s Association, and Unrepresented Employees.

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATION OF LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
One (1) Potential case(s).

4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR – (added 2-22-22) Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8
Property: 225 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach
City Negotiator: City Manager Gregory Wade and City Attorney Johanna Canlas Negotiating Parties: Barr-Schenkel Trust
Under negotiation: Purchase Price and Terms

Present: Lesa Heebner, Kristi Becker, Kelly Harless, David A. Zito, Jewel Edson

Absent: None
Also

Present:

Gregory Wade, City Manager
Johanna Canlas, City Attorney
Solana Beach City Council Closed Session Minutes February 23, 2022 Page 2 of 2 No reportable action.

ADJOURN:

Mayor Heebner adjourned the meeting at 6:05 p.m.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

SOLANA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY

MINUTES
Joint REGULAR Meeting
Wednesday, February 23, 2022 * 6:00 p.m.

Teleconference Location Only-City Hall/Council Chambers, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California This meeting will be conducted in accordance with California Government Code sections 54953(e) and 54954.3 and other applicable law.

See Public Participation on the first page of the Agenda for publication participation options.

READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS:

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:

Mayor Heebner called the meeting to order at 6:12 p.m.

Present: Lesa Heebner, Kelly Harless, David A. Zito, Jewel Edson, Kristi Becker,

Absent: None
Also

Present:

Greg Wade, City Manager
Johanna Canlas, City Attorney
Angela Ivey, City Clerk
Dan King, Assistant City Manager
Mo Sammak, City Engineer/Public Works Dir.

Ryan Smith, Finance Dir.

Joseph Lim, Community Development Dir.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT: None
FLAG SALUTE:

APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Becker and second by Councilmember Zito to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

I
L J
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 2022 Page 2 of 7 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

Note to Public: Refer to Public Participation for information on how to submit public comment.

This portion of the agenda provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items relating to City business and not appearing on today’s agenda by joining the virtual meeting online to speak live, per the Public Participation instructions on the Agenda.

Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action shall be taken by the City Council on public comment items.

No written correspondence may be submitted in lieu of public speaking. Council may refer items to the City Manager for placement on a future agenda. The maximum time allotted for each speaker is THREE MINUTES (SBMC 2.04.190).

Barbara Gordon spoke about her work with the San Dieguito Alliance and the San Diego County’s Tobacco Control Coalition and support for the California Assembly Bill 1690 to ban the single use cigarette filters, single use electronic cigarettes and some vape products statewide to protect the environment from non-biodegradable and toxic litter.

COUNCIL COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENTARY:

An opportunity for City Council to make brief announcements or report on their activities. These items are not agendized for official City business with no action or substantive discussion.

A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Action Items) (A.1. - A.6.)
Note to Public: Refer to Public Participation for information on how to submit public comment.

Items listed on the Consent Calendar are to be acted in a single action of the City Council unless pulled for discussion.

Any member of the public may address the City Council on an item of concern by submitting written correspondence for the record to be filed with the record or by joining the virtual meeting online to speak live, per the Public Participation instructions on the Agenda. The maximum time allotted for each speaker is THREE MINUTES (SBMC 2.04.190).

Those items removed from the Consent Calendar by a member of the Council will be trailed to the end of the agenda, while Consent Calendar items removed by the public will be discussed immediately after approval of the Consent Calendar.

A.1. Register Of Demands. (File 0300-30)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Ratify the list of demands for January 22, 2022 – February 04, 2022.

Item A.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Zito and second by Deputy Mayor Harless to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.2. General Fund Budget Adjustments for Fiscal Year 2021/2022. (File 0330-30) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Receive the report listing changes made to the Fiscal Year 2021/2022 General Fund Adopted Budget.

Item A.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Zito and second by Deputy Mayor Harless to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.3. Street Maintenance & Repair Project Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22. (File 0820-35) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-019:
a. Awarding a construction contract for the FY 21-22 Street Maintenance & Repair Project, Bid 2022-01, in the amount of $547,612, to PAL General Engineering.
b. Approving an amount of $155,888 for construction contingency. c. Authorizing the appropriation of $17,500 from the Public Arts Reserve account to the General Fund CIP for the installation of the art pads at Las Banderas/San Andreas Drive and North Cedros Avenue/E. Cliff Street. d. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the construction contract on behalf of the City.
e. Authorizing the City Manager to approve cumulative change orders up to the construction contingency amount.

Item A.3. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Zito and second by Deputy Mayor Harless to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

Councilmember Edson made comments about the proposed speed cushions on South Cedros, striping and painting for vehicles and bike lanes, the asphalt turn on Ida and the art pad at San Andres and Las Banderas that are included in the project.

A.4. Destruction of Obsolete Records. (File 0170-50)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-018 authorizing the destruction of officially obsolete records.

Item A.4. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Zito and second by Deputy Mayor Harless to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.5. Oppose Initiative 21-0042A1 – Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act. (File 0480-70)
Recommendation: That the City Council
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 2022 Page 4 of 7

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-021 opposing Initiative 21-0042A1 the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act.

Item A.5. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Zito and second by Deputy Mayor Harless to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (B.1.)
Note to Public: Refer to Public Participation for information on how to submit public comment.

Any member of the public may address the City Council on an item of concern by submitting written correspondence for the record to be filed with the record or by registering to join the virtual meeting online to speak live, per the Public Participation instructions on the Agenda. The maximum time allotted for each speaker is THREE MINUTES (SBMC 2.04.190).

An applicant or designee(s) for a private development/business project, for which the public hearing is being held, is allotted a total of fifteen minutes to speak, as per SBMC 2.04.210. A portion of the fifteen minutes may be saved to respond to those who speak in opposition. All other speakers have three minutes each.

After considering all of the evidence, including written materials and oral testimony, the City Council must make a decision supported by findings and the findings must be supported by substantial evidence in the record.

B.1. Public Hearing: 603 Glencrest Pl., Applicant: Johnson, Case: DRP20- 016/SDP20-022. (File 0600-40)
The proposed project could be found to be consistent with the General Plan and the underlying SBMC could be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2022-014 conditionally approving a DRP and SDP to allow for the construction of a first-story remodel and new second-story addition to an existing one-story, single-family residence with an attached garage at 603 Glencrest Place, Solana Beach.

Item B.1. Report (click here)
Item B.1. Supplemental Docs (updated 2-17-22)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Greg Wade, City Manager, introduced the item.

Tiffany Wade, Sr. Assistant Planner, presented a PowerPoint (on file).

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 2022 Page 5 of 7 Todd Johnson, Applicant, spoke about he and his wife’s project, plans to live in the home, and their involvement in the community.

Council and Applicant discussed the plans for the trees and that only one would be removed.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Zito and second Deputy Mayor Harless to close the public hearing. Approved 5/0: Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Zito and second by Councilmember Edson to approve.

Approved 5/0: Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

C. STAFF REPORTS: (C.1. – C.2.)
Note to Public: Refer to Public Participation for information on how to submit public comment.

C.1. La Colonia Master Plan Update. (File 0720-15)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-017 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement, in an amount not to exceed $52,140, with Van Dyke Landscape Architects to update the La Colonia Master Plan, which would incorporate the vacant City-owned parcels north of the La Colonia Skate Park.

2. Authorizing an appropriation of $32,140 from the General Fund Undesignated Reserve Fund into the project account for the La Colonia Master Plan Update.

3. Authorizing the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2021/2022 and FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget accordingly.

Item C.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Greg Wade, City Manager, introduced the item.

Mo Sammak, Engineering/Public Works Dir., presented a PowerPoint (on file).

Council and Staff discussed the scope and what might be missing, parking, relocation of the museum, work on the community center, and what might be the best use of the additional property acquired north of the park.

Council and Mitch Phillippe, Van Dyke, discussed the online survey for public input, measuring responses by requiring the address of the person providing input so that those closer to the property may be weighted differently than those not in the immediate area, using Google Survey that would require a log in and email to answer the questions, watching for duplications, and providing some sample questions before distribution.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 2022 Page 6 of 7 Joe Behrmann spoke about an idea for the newly acquired land in La Colonia called Edible Eden as a community fruit and pollinator garden, the environmental benefit offsetting carbon by adding trees and landscaping, that it could also be used for a meeting and reflecting area, and asked that it be added to the Master Plan.

Council, Staff, and Mr. Behrmann spoke about the community contribution for the upkeep of such a fruit forest, buy-in from local garden programs and the schools, whether it may be an added benefit for the community, and obtaining public input for the idea through an online portal in addition to the survey.

Motion: Moved by Mayor Heebner and second by Deputy Mayor Harless to approve.

Approved 5/0: Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Zito, Edson. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

C.2. Fire Department Community Risk Assessment & Standards of Cover and Management/Administrative Assessment. (File 0260-10)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Receive the presentation from the Fire Department and Fitch and Associates, LLC, and provide feedback.

Item C.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Greg Wade, City Manager, introduced the item.

Mike Stein, Fire Captain, said that the document examined the potential risks in the community as well as the fire department’s capabilities to meet the risks, provides a benchmark that City officials and fire department management would use to measure success, it will be a comprehensive document evaluating both fire department operations and management.

Mike Despin, Fitch and Associates, presented a PowerPoint (on file) reviewing the process and the contents of the document and potential strategic recommendations.

Council, Chief Stein, and Mr. Despin discussed that a resulting plan could be conducted by Fitch and Associates or another firm, to consider doing it every five years, that it was an appropriate time to implement it, call volumes might be increasing due to the aging population demographic that uses 9-1-1 even though the population numbers have remained stagnant, possible managing call volumes with fire prevention and public education instead of adding more firefighters, that all current stations were within normal call volumes in overall comparison to other stations, recommendations may include administrative instead of deployment, that the service levels due to events at the Fairgrounds was not part of the analysis but that it could be reviewed again separately, that call volume plummeted during COVID, that the goals will be shared with CSA-17, that they agreed with the analysis performed by Fitch and Associates.

A.6. Oppose City of Oceanside’s Planned Beach Sand Replenishment and Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 2022 Page 7 of 7 Retention Device Project. (File 0480-75)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-016 approving a statement of opposition to constructing devices that could interfere with the natural flow of beach sand.

Item A.6. Report (click here)
Item A.6. Supplemental Docs (updated 2-23-22 at 3:00pm) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Greg Wade, City Manager, introduced the item spoke about the projected pilot project that Oceanside was considering for sand retention with the use of jetties that would extend perpendicularly from the shoreline out into the ocean with the purpose of trapping sand that would normally follow a natural flow to areas south of Oceanside and would in turn potentially limit sediment transport along the coast to neighboring coastal cities and therefore an opposition was being considered.

Shari Mackin said that this was a regional problem and would like to see it pulled back and work through SANDAG working groups rather than off on their own and take into consideration the neighbors south of Oceanside.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Deputy Mayor Harless to approve.

Approved 4/0/1. Ayes: Heebner, Becker, Harless, Edson. Noes: None. Abstain: Zito. Motion carried unanimously.

COMPENSATION & REIMBURSEMENT DISCLOSURE: None
GC: Article 2.3. Compensation: 53232.3. (a) Reimbursable expenses shall include, but not be limited to, meals, lodging, and travel. 53232.3 (d) Members of a legislative body shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency “City” at the next regular meeting of the legislative body.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS: Council Committees
REGIONAL COMMITTEES: (outside agencies, appointed by this Council) STANDING COMMITTEES: (All Primary Members) (Permanent Committees)

CITIZEN COMMISSION(S)
ADJOURN:

Mayor Heebner adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. in memory of Mary Zito and in honor of organ donors everywhere.

CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.2.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance
SUBJECT: Register of Demands
BACKGROUND:

Section 3.04.020 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code requires that the City Council ratify a register of demands which represents all financial demands made upon the City for the applicable period.

Register of Demands- 04/16/22 through 04/29/22
Check Register-Disbursement Fund (Attachment 1) $ 632,612.39 Net Payroll M22 April 29, 2022 198,370.07
TOTAL $ 830,982.46
DISCUSSION:

Staff certifies that the register of demands has been reviewed for accuracy, that funds are available to pay the above demands, and that the demands comply with the adopted budget.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The register of demands for April 16, 2022 through April 29, 2022 reflects total expenditures of $830,982.46 from various City sources.

WORK PLAN:

N/A
May 11, 2022
Register of Demands

Page 2 of 2 ends

OPTIONS:
• Ratify the register of demands.
• Do not ratify and provide direction.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the above register of demands.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Check Register – Disbursement Fund
Page: 1 of 5
City of Solana Beach
Register of Demands
4/16/2022 - 4/29/2022
Department
Vendor Description Date
Check/EFT
Number Amount
100 - GENERAL FUND
ICMA PLAN 302817 04/28/2022 9000481 $14,144.33
ICMA RHS 801939 04/28/2022 9000482 $1,960.07
LA COLONIA DE EDEN GARDENS INC 04/22/2022 101734 $500.00 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 04/20/2022 90420221 $503.48
MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 04/20/2022 90420221 ($101.65)
MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 04/20/2022 90420221 $11.29
MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 04/20/2022 90420221 $11.29
MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 04/20/2022 90420221 ($19.91)
MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 04/20/2022 90420221 $11.29
DANA KETTLER 04/22/2022 101729 $500.00
ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC 04/28/2022 9000479 $6,752.20 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC 04/28/2022 9000479 $6,752.20 CALPERS 04/22/2022 9042222 $49,461.92
STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. 04/22/2022 9000477 $237.50 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. 04/22/2022 9000477 $1,343.75 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. 04/22/2022 9000477 $439.77

SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY
Payroll Run 1 - Warrant M22
Payroll Run 1 - Warrant M22
RFND-FCCC 04/02/22
VISION APRIL 22
EE COBRA APR 22
EE COBRA APR 22
EE COBRA APR 22
EE TIMING APR 22
EE TIMING APR 22
RFND-FCCC 04/03/22
CROSSING GUARD-03/06/22-03/19/22
CROSSING GUARD-03/20/22-04/02/22
04/15/22 PD (04/22/22 PERS)
MC10-FSA FUNDING
M21-FSA/DCA FUNDING
M21-FSA/DCA FUNDING
DENTAL APRIL 22 04/22/2022 9000475 $2,943.30
SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY 04/22/2022 9000475 ($138.30) SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY 04/22/2022 9000475 $44.60

SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY
EE TIMING APRIL 22
EE TIMING APRIL 22
EE COBRA APRIL 22 04/22/2022 9000475 $44.60
SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY 04/22/2022 9000475 $44.60

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
EE COBRA APRIL 22
PD042922 ORDER#633140172933902746 04/28/2022 101752 $625.35 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $86,071.68
1005150 - CITY CLERK
UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY ORD-522 AMEND 04/22/2022 101745 $85.14 ROBERT HALF FRONT DESK TEMP-04/08/22 04/22/2022 101741 $1,714.78 ROBERT HALF FRONT DESK TEMP-04/15/22 04/28/2022 101763 $1,652.80 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT, INC RECORDS STORAGE-MAR 04/22/2022 101728 $510.59 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT, INC DESTRUCTION-03/03/22 04/28/2022 101750 $177.87 TOTAL CITY CLERK $4,141.18
1005200 - CITY MANAGER
EMANUELS JONES AND ASSOCIATES PROF SVC-APR 04/22/2022 101731 $2,500.00 TOTAL CITY MANAGER $2,500.00
1005250 - LEGAL SERVICES
HOGAN LAW APC GENERAL LEGAL-OCT 04/28/2022 101753 $227.50 HOGAN LAW APC GENERAL LEGAL-MAR 04/22/2022 101732 $3,139.37 NIELSEN MERKSAMER REDISTRICT PROF SVC-MAR 04/22/2022 101736 $14,858.00 TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES $18,224.87
1005300 - FINANCE
Page: 2 of 5
KFORCE INC. FINANCE TEMP-03/31/22 04/28/2022 9000483 $1,023.84 TOTAL FINANCE $1,023.84
1005350 - SUPPORT SERVICES
JENNIFER REED ADMIN SVC-MAR 04/28/2022 9000485 $156.00
TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES $156.00
1005400 - HUMAN RESOURCES
MEDICAL EYE SERVICES ROUNDING - APR 22 04/20/2022 90420221 ($0.20) PRIMO INVESTIGATIONS BACKGROUND CHECK-ENG 04/22/2022 101740 $325.00 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES $324.80
1005550 - PLANNING
UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY PUB HRNG-DRP21-005 04/22/2022 101745 $391.68 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AS NEED SERVICE-SANTA HELENA TRAIL 04/22/2022 9000476 $300.00 TOTAL PLANNING $691.68
1006120 - FIRE DEPARTMENT
ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES PANTS-BASIN 04/22/2022 101722 $116.89 AFECO INC CLEANING/PATCHES/REPAIR-BARRON 04/22/2022 101744 $605.81 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT $722.70
1006130 - ANIMAL CONTROL
HABITAT PROTECTION, INC DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL-APR 04/28/2022 101760 $145.00 TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL $145.00
1006170 - MARINE SAFETY
CULLIGAN OF SAN DIEGO DRINKING WATER SVC-APR 04/28/2022 101751 $52.83 TOTAL MARINE SAFETY $52.83
1006510 - ENGINEERING
VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1 03/02/22-04/01/22 04/28/2022 101766 $51.35 TOTAL ENGINEERING $51.35
1006520 - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 04/22/2022 101735 $13.62 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC H-STORM DRAIN MAINT 04/22/2022 101723 $1,140.00 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-014/03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $238.96 MIKHAIL OGAWA ENGINEERING STRWTR PRK MNGMT-MAR 04/28/2022 101756 $9,633.79 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1 03/02/22-04/01/22 04/28/2022 101766 $51.35 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS HHW-JUL 20 REISSUE 04/22/2022 101726 $1,822.96 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS HHW-AUG 20 REISSUE 04/22/2022 101726 $1,404.44 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS HHW-OCT 20 REISSUE 04/22/2022 101726 $1,249.14 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS HHW-NOV 20 REISSUE 04/22/2022 101726 $1,096.74 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS HHW-DEC 20 REISSUE 04/22/2022 101726 $1,004.24 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS HHW-APR 21 REISSUE 04/22/2022 101726 $1,465.18 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS HHW-MAY 21 REISSUE 04/22/2022 101726 $900.30 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS HHW-JUN 21 REISSUE 04/22/2022 101726 $1,349.72 TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $21,370.44
1006530 - STREET MAINTENANCE
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 04/22/2022 101735 $23.35 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC RFND-BLACK TOP PATCH 04/22/2022 101730 ($170.14) DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC L BRACES/BOLT ANCHORS 04/22/2022 101730 $13.19 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC AEROSOL/RUSTOLEUM 04/22/2022 101730 $49.20 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 011695-000-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $117.83 Page: 3 of 5
UNITED RENTALS, INC SIDEWALK GRINDER MAINT 04/28/2022 101765 $1,782.04 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1 03/02/22-04/01/22 04/28/2022 101766 $51.35 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. SCISSORLIFT 04/28/2022 101764 $457.16 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE $2,323.98
1006540 - TRAFFIC SAFETY
VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1 03/02/22-04/01/22 04/28/2022 101766 $36.68 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC CROSSING GUARD-03/06/22-03/19/22 04/28/2022 9000479 $3,635.80 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC CROSSING GUARD-03/20/22-04/02/22 04/28/2022 9000479 $3,635.80 TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY $7,308.28
1006550 - STREET CLEANING
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 011695-000-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $69.20 CLEAN STREET STREET SWEEPING SVC-MAR 04/22/2022 101727 $3,871.45 PRIDE INDUSTRIES TRASH ABATEMENT SERVICES-MAR 04/22/2022 101739 $660.24 TOTAL STREET CLEANING $4,600.89
1006560 - PARK MAINTENANCE
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 04/22/2022 101735 $16.54 RANCHO SANTA FE SECURITY SYS INC RESTROOM LOCK/UNLOCK-APR 04/28/2022 101761 $611.58 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-018-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $433.36 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-019-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $894.74 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-005-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $275.31 NAPA AUTO PARTS INC WAX DRY/FUEL STABILZR/WASH TAB 04/28/2022 101757 $58.13 NAPA AUTO PARTS INC TRANSMISSION FLUID/THREADLOCKER 04/28/2022 101757 $53.30 AA FARNSWORTH'S BACKFLOW SERVICES ANNUAL BACKFLOW TEST 04/28/2022 101747 $369.25 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1 03/02/22-04/01/22 04/28/2022 101766 $73.36 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA LC PARK-MAR 04/22/2022 101737 $2,660.00 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAINT SVC-MAR-PARKS 04/28/2022 101758 $618.87 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINT SVC-MAR-PARKS 04/28/2022 101758 $1,639.36 ABEL PEREZ MILEAGE-04/16 & 04/18/22 04/28/2022 101748 $8.19 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. TILLER 04/28/2022 101764 $105.24
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE $7,817.23
1006570 - PUBLIC FACILITIES
DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC MOTION DETECTOR/PLATE 04/22/2022 101730 $22.77 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC SHOVEL/LATCH TOTE 04/22/2022 101730 $98.51 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC STRIPPER/CUTTER 04/22/2022 101730 $53.85 NAPA AUTO PARTS INC POWERATED BELT/TRYFLEX V-BELT 04/28/2022 101757 $31.23 NAPA AUTO PARTS INC PRIMER SPRAY 04/28/2022 101757 $45.22 LALLEY CONSTRUCTION ON-CALL REPAIR SVC-04/04/22 04/28/2022 101755 $4,680.00 LALLEY CONSTRUCTION ON-CALL REPAIR SVC-01/12/22 04/28/2022 101755 $1,105.00 24 HOUR ELEVATOR, INC ELEVATOR MAINT-APR 04/28/2022 101746 $176.40 ABEL PEREZ MILEAGE-04/16 & 04/18/22 04/28/2022 101748 $8.19 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 FIRST AID SUPPLIES-CH 04/28/2022 101749 $63.73 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL-FS-MAR 04/22/2022 101738 $40.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL-[W-MAR 04/22/2022 101738 $34.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL-FC-MAR 04/22/2022 101738 $34.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PESTCONTROL-CH-MAR 04/22/2022 101738 $53.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL-LC-MAR 04/22/2022 101738 $35.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL-MS-MAR 04/22/2022 101738 $63.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL SVC-APR-LC 04/28/2022 101760 $35.00 Page: 4 of 5
HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL SVC-APR-CH 04/28/2022 101760 $53.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL SVC-APR-FCCC 04/28/2022 101760 $34.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST/RODENT CONTROL SVC-APR-MS 04/28/2022 101760 $63.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL SVC-APR-PW 04/28/2022 101760 $34.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC PEST CONTROL SVC-APR-FS 04/28/2022 101760 $40.00 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC-OCT 04/22/2022 101725 $7,200.00 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC-OCT 04/22/2022 101725 $150.00 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC-MAR 04/22/2022 101725 $390.00 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC-MAR 04/22/2022 101725 $150.00 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC-MAR 04/22/2022 101725 $6,710.00 READY REFRESH BY NESTLE DRINKING WATER-MAR-LC 04/28/2022 101762 $66.94 READY REFRESH BY NESTLE DRINKING WATER-MAR-PW 04/28/2022 101762 $40.95 PRIDE INDUSTRIES TRASH ABATEMENT SERVICES-MAR 04/22/2022 101739 $660.24 TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES $22,171.03
1205460 - SELF INSURANCE RETENTION
SECTRAN SECURITY INC COURIER SRVC/FUEL-APR 04/22/2022 101743 $124.70 SECTRAN SECURITY INC COURIER SRVC/FUEL-APR 04/22/2022 101743 $31.12 TOTAL SELF INSURANCE RETENTION $155.82
1605360 - OPEB OBLIGATION
MIDAMERICA MAY 22 04/28/2022 9000484 $6,740.00
TOTAL OPEB OBLIGATION $6,740.00
2047520 - MID 9C SANTA FE HILLS
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-014-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $922.11 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-021-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $683.60 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-022-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $581.94 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-023-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $581.94 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-024-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $445.09 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-025-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $605.40 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-026-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $789.17 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-015-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $546.75 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-016-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $366.89 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-017-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $59.55 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-018-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $90.83 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-019-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $317.61 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-020-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $793.08 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-006-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $1,174.65 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-029-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $728.06 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-007-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $1,419.96 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-009-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $684.03 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-010-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $391.78 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-011-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $454.68 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-012-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $121.31 TOTAL MID 9C SANTA FE HILLS $11,758.43
2087580 - COASTAL RAIL TRAIL MAINT
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-020-03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $1,203.03 KOPPEL & GRUBER PUBLIC FINANCE CRT ADMIN-JAN - MAR 04/28/2022 101754 $327.47 TOTAL COASTAL RAIL TRAIL MAINT $1,530.50
2117600 - STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT
Page: 5 of 5
KOPPEL & GRUBER PUBLIC FINANCE CRT ADMIN-JAN - MAR 04/28/2022 101754 $570.49 KOPPEL & GRUBER PUBLIC FINANCE CRT ADMIN-JAN - MAR 04/28/2022 101754 $69.48 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1 03/02/22-04/01/22 04/28/2022 101766 $14.67 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT $654.64
2135550 - DEVELOPER PASS-THRU- PLANNING
PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP22007/147 S RIOS AVE 04/22/2022 9000476 $450.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP21016/1005 HIGHLAND 04/22/2022 9000476 $300.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SDP21021/421 N GRANADOS 04/22/2022 9000476 $300.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DRP21019/434 SAN LUCAS 04/22/2022 9000476 $300.00 PAMELA ELLIOTT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1717.34/652 STEVENS AVE 04/22/2022 9000476 $300.00 TOTAL DEVELOPER PASS-THRU- PLANNING $1,650.00
2505570 - COASTAL BUSINESS/VISITORS
BELLY UP TAVERN LLC CONCERT BOOKING-JUN/JUL/AUG-FY 22 04/22/2022 101724 $750.00 TOTAL COASTAL BUSINESS/VISITORS $750.00
4506190 - SAND REPLNSHMNT/RETENTION
SUMMIT ENVIROMENTAL GROUP, INC. 9926 PROF SVC-MAR 04/22/2022 9000478 $1,495.00 TOTAL SAND REPLNSHMNT/RETENTION $1,495.00
459 - MISC. CAPITAL PROJECTS
NU-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC SEWER/STORM DRAIN REHAB RETENTION 04/28/2022 101759 ($9,526.50) TOTAL MISC. CAPITAL PROJECTS ($9,526.50)
4596510 - MISC.CAPITALPROJECTS-ENG
NU-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC 2021 SEWER & STORM DRAIN REHAB 04/28/2022 101759 $190,530.00 TOTAL MISC.CAPITALPROJECTS-ENG $190,530.00
5096510 - SANITATION-CIP-ENG
NU-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC 2021 SEWER & STORM DRAIN REHAB 04/28/2022 101759 $142,306.25 TOTAL SANITATION-CIP-ENG $142,306.25
5097700 - SANITATION
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 04/22/2022 101735 $9.73 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC C-SEWER CLEANING-19,482 04/22/2022 101723 $9,741.00 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC I-SEWER CLEAN 04/22/2022 101723 $425.00 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-014/03/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $716.90 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005979-008-02/02/22-04/01/22 04/22/2022 101742 $90.68 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 362455526-1 03/02/22-04/01/22 04/28/2022 101766 $14.67 NU-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC SEWER/STORM DRAIN REHAB RETENTION 04/28/2022 101759 ($7,115.31) TOTAL SANITATION $3,882.67
5507750 - SOLANA ENERGY ALLIANCE
INBOUND DESIGN INC. SEA WEBSITE MAINT-APR 04/22/2022 101733 $49.00 TOTAL SOLANA ENERGY ALLIANCE $49.00
6527820 - SUCCESSOR AGENCY
COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST 06/01 2017TA BOND 04/28/2022 9000480 $37,438.80 COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST 06/01 2017TA BOND 04/28/2022 9000480 $63,500.00 TOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY $100,938.80
REPORT TOTAL: $632,612.39
COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.3.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance
SUBJECT: Report on Changes Made to the General Fund Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22
BACKGROUND:

Staff provides a report at each Council meeting that lists changes made to the current Fiscal Year (FY) General Fund Adopted Budget. The information provided in this Staff Report lists the changes made through April 27, 2022.

DISCUSSION:

The following table on the next page reports the revenue, expenditures, and transfers for 1) the Adopted General Fund Budget approved by Council on June 23, 2021 (Resolution 2021- 092) and 2) any resolutions passed by Council that amended the Adopted General Fund Budget.

Date Action Description Revenues Expenditures
Transfers
from GF Net Surplus
06/23/2021 Reso 2021-092 Adopted Budget 22,694,100 (20,222,560) (916,100) $ 1,555,440 06/23/2021 Reso 2021-086 Crossing Guards 121,540 (48,984) - 1,627,996 07/14/2021 Reso 2021-096 FY22 MOU - (950) - 1,627,046
09/08/2021 Reso 2021-103 Landscaping Maintenance Services - (40,000) - 1,587,046 11/10/2021 Reso 2021-125 Street Maintenance and Repairs Project - - (200,000) 1,387,046 02/23/2022 Reso 2022-017 La Colonia Master Plan Update - - (32,140) 1,354,906 02/23/2022 Reso 2022-019 Street Maintenance and Repairs Project - - (17,500) 1,337,406 03/09/2022 Reso 2022-025 FY22 Mid-Year Budget Update 365,000 (358,000) - 1,344,406 04/13/2022 Reso 2022-034 Economic Consulting Services - (30,000) - 1,314,406 Date Action Description Revenues Expenditures
Transfers
from GF Net
10/27/2021 Reso 2021-124 FY21 Surplus- PARS Contribution (455,000) - (455,000)

GENERAL FUND - ADOPTED BUDGET PLUS CHANGES
As of April 27, 2022
General Fund Operations
General Fund Unreserved Balance
May 11, 2022
General Fund Budget Changes -FY 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA
FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
WORK PLAN:

N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Receive the report.
∙ Do not accept the report
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive the report listing changes made to the FY 2021-2022 General Fund Adopted Budget.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.4.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2022-040 approving a Professional Services Agreement for Sewer and Storm
Drain Maintenance and Video Inspection
BACKGROUND:

The City currently has a service agreement for basic cleaning of sewer and as-needed maintenance services for the City’s storm drain system that includes an annual scheduled cleaning of an estimated 255,000 feet of sewer line. Preventative maintenance is also performed under this agreement on the two low-flow diverters located at the Fletcher Cove Park and Seascape Sur Beach Access, the siphon structure in San Elijo Lagoon, sewer laterals at several City facilities and over 35 storm drain catch basins throughout the City.

In addition to routine cleaning and preventative maintenance, the service agreement includes a video inspection component and an “on-call” component to the Agreement to handle investigations, emergencies and spills as directed by Staff.

The City’s service agreement with the current service provider will terminate at the end of this fiscal year on June 30, 2022. On April 7, 2022, Staff posted a Request for Proposals (RFP) to eBidboard (the City’s electronic procurement system) to solicit proposals from private industry service providers.

This item is before the City Council to consider adoption of Resolution 2022-040 approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) for sewer and storm drain maintenance and video inspection services with Affordable Pipeline Services effective July 1, 2022. The Agreement would be for a period of one year and would authorize the City Manager to approve extensions to the Agreement for up to four additional one-year terms at the City’s option.

May 11, 2022
Sewer Maintenance and Video Inspection Agreement

Page 2 of 5 ends

DISCUSSION:

In April 2022, Staff evaluated the sewer cleaning, storm drain cleaning, and video needs and prepared an RFP to solicit proposals for providing such services. The following are the required services the City is seeking:
• CCTV inspection for Sewer and Storm Drain lines
• General sewer line cleaning (per year)
• Herbicidal foaming to eliminate roots in sewer lines (as needed) • Clean hot-spot sewer lines
• Preventative sewer line cleaning
• Clean manhole and sewer line to restrooms at Fletcher Cove Park • Clean grease interceptor wet well and sewer line to street at La Colonia Park • Dye testing to check for leaks (as needed)
• On-call/emergency call outs (sewer spill, storm drain stoppage, etc.) • Miscellaneous sewer/storm drain maintenance
• Additional, unanticipated services (as needed)
• Mark out sewer line locations for Dig Alert requests (as needed) • Clean siphon structure
• General storm cleaning (as needed)
• Clean CDS Units
• Inspect the Stevens Creek storm drain box channel
• Clean 35 catch basins (per year)

The scope of work identified above falls under the state Public Contracts Code (PCC) exception to public contracting requirements. Section 20161 of the PCC specifically exempts sewer maintenance work from the competitive bidding process. Further, Government Code section 4526 specifies that contracts for professional services do not need to be competitively bid, but rather, may be awarded based upon “demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required.” Thus, cost is not the sole determining factor in deciding whether to award such professional services contracts.

The City issued a RFP for these professional services in April 2022. Two proposals were submitted to the City in response to the RFP. The RFP requested that contractors submitting proposals provide information regarding their understanding of the project, their certificate of compliance with the California Air Resources Board, their experience in performing similar types of services, their capability to provide services for the size of the City’s network, their professionalism and their ability to respond to emergencies. The RFP also requested that the cost of these services be calculated using unit prices for each type of service multiplied by the anticipated quantities or frequencies of the services.

The table below provides a list of the service providers that submitted proposals along with the corresponding cost for the services listed above.

May 11, 2022
Sewer Maintenance and Video Inspection Agreement

Page 3 of 5 ends

Proposals Received
Contractors
Proposal
Costs
Affordable Pipeline Services $471,710
Downstream Services $668,616
Three Staff members independently reviewed the proposals, rated the contractor’s qualifications and ranked them based on the above-mentioned criteria. All raters agreed that Affordable Pipeline Services (Affordable) is the most qualified candidate to perform the annual maintenance services for the City’s sewer collection and storm drain systems.

Affordable is a local service provider with a maintenance yard and headquarters office located within 13 miles of the City. They have been providing similar services for the City for the past ten years and Staff is very satisfied with their performance. Affordable has extensive knowledge of the City’s network and can continue the services seamlessly with no learning curve. Staff believes Affordable’s knowledge and familiarity with the City’s sewer and storm drain systems would result in considerable cost savings. Affordable’s emergency response plan is firmly established with a proven history and well within the City’s requirements. Based on the City’s past experience, Affordable has been spending several days per week working on various tasks in the City for the entire term of their current Agreement. Affordable agreed to continue the same approach towards performing day to day operational activities with having equipment and personnel in the City on a regular basis during the term of this Agreement.

This Agreement is structured to provide “anticipated routine work” such as sewer cleaning, root foaming and videotaping as well as “scheduled preventative maintenance” such as monthly cleaning of the CDS units, monthly services for the siphon structure, and sewer main and lateral cleaning at City facilities. The Agreement also includes unanticipated components such as emergency/on-call services, as-needed services like dye testing and other miscellaneous services. Because of the nature of these types of services, it is impossible to determine the exact contract amount for these unanticipated items. Staff is proposing an extra amount in the Agreement to cover the cost of unanticipated emergency responses. Staff will carefully monitor all aspects of the Agreement including the unanticipated emergency responses to ensure the work provided each year does not exceed the budgeted amount. If at any time during the terms of this Agreement it is determined that the contingency amount may be exceeded, Staff will return to the City Council to appropriate additional funds and conversely, leftover budget, if any, would return to Sanitation funds at the end of each Agreement year term.

It should be noted that over the past several years, additional funding for unanticipated emergency responses has not been needed.

While the evaluation process was independent of the proposed cost, as shown above, Affordable also offered the lowest cost proposal for similar services.

May 11, 2022
Sewer Maintenance and Video Inspection Agreement

Page 4 of 5 ends

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Exempt pursuant to Section 15301(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Costs for the sewer and storm drain maintenance Agreement comes from two budget units, with the bulk of the cost each year for sewer line cleaning coming from the Sanitation Professional Services Account. Storm drain cleaning and related storm drain facility maintenance is funded from the Environmental Professional Services Account.

Staff recommends the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Affordable in the amount of $471,710.00 for maintenance services for sewer and storm drain system plus an additional $30,000 contingency amount for unforeseen incidents for a yearly contract total of $501,710 WORK PLAN:

Maintenance of the City’s sanitary sewer system and storm drains is consistent with the Environmental Sustainability section of the proposed 2021/22 Work Plan.

OPTIONS:
• Adopt Staff recommendations.
• Provide direction to Staff and approve a modified maintenance Agreement. • Reject maintenance proposals and provide direction to Staff.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 2022-040:

1. Waiving the formal construction bid process because Request for Proposals (RFP) process provides a more efficient, effective, and convenient method for hiring a sewer maintenance contractor that would provide the higher level of service required pursuant to Solana Beach Municipal Code section

3.08.140(G).

2. Approving a Professional Services Agreement with Affordable Pipeline Service, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $501,710, in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/2023, for the Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance and Video Inspection services.

May 11, 2022
Sewer Maintenance and Video Inspection Agreement

Page 5 of 5 ends

3. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement on behalf of the City.

4. Authorizing the City Manager to extend the Agreement for up to four additional one-year terms, at the City’s option, at an amount not to exceed the amount identified and budgeted for in each subsequent year.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-040
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-040

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR SEWER

AND STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE AND VIDEO

INSPECTION WITH AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES,
INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $378,246.50
WHEREAS, the work associated with the sewer and storm drain maintenance and video inspection contract has been classified as a service contract or professional services instead of a public works construction project per section 20161 of the Public Contract Code (PCC); and
WHEREAS, the PCC specifically exempts sewer maintenance work from the competitive bidding process of the public contracting law; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 4526 specifies that contracts for professional services do not need to be competitively bid, but rather, may be awarded based upon “demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required”; and WHEREAS, the formal bid requirements under Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) section 3.08.140 may be waived by the City Council when it is necessary or convenient for the management of the of the City’s affairs pursuant to SBMC section

3.08.140; and
WHEREAS, a flexible contracting process involving sewer maintenance and related services facilitates a more efficient and convenient management of City’s affairs; and
WHEREAS, a Request for Proposals (RFP) process provides a more efficient and effective method for hiring a sewer maintenance contractor that would provide the higher level of service required; and
WHEREAS, the City issued a RFP for these professional services in April 2022 that was consistent with the City’s purchasing ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council waive the formal construction bid process because the Request for Proposals (RFP) process provides a more efficient, effective, and convenient method for hiring a sewer maintenance contractor that would provide Resolution No. 2022-040
Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance Contract

Page 2 of 2 ends

the higher level of service required pursuant to Solana Beach Municipal Code section 3.08.140.

3. That the City Council approves a Professional Services Agreement with Affordable Pipeline Service, Inc. in the amount not to exceed $379,910 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/2023, for the Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance Services Agreement.

4. That the City Council approves an amount of $41,000 for sewer maintenance contingency and $10,000 for storm drain maintenance contingency.

5. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement on behalf of the City.

6. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to extend the Agreement for up to four additional one-year terms, at the City’s option, at an amount not to exceed the amount identified and budgeted for in each subsequent year.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 11th day of May, 2022 by the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # B.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Request for a DRP, SDP, and SDP Waiver to Demolish and Single-Family Residence, Construct a
Replacement Single-Family Residence with a Basement
and an Attached Garage, and Perform Associated Site
Improvements at 506 Pacific Avenue. (Applicant: Jim and Kathleen Boyd; Application: DRP20-014/SDP20-020; APN:
263-041-17; Resolution No. 2022-049)
BACKGROUND:

The Applicants, Jim and Kathleen Boyd, are requesting City Council approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP), Structure Development Permit (SDP), and SDP Waiver to demolish a single-story single-family residence, construct a replacement 2,986 square-foot, two-story single-family residence built above a 1,274 square-foot basement with an attached 448 square-foot two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 506 Pacific Avenue. The 6,120 square-foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The project proposes grading in the amounts of approximately 40 cubic yards of cut and 40 cubic yards of fill outside of the footprint of the structure, 750 cubic yards of excavation for the basement, 50 cubic yards of excavation for footings, 880 cubic yards of removal and recompaction, an aggregate grading quantity of 1,760 cubic yards, and 800 cubic yards of export off site. The maximum building height is proposed at 24.87 feet above the proposed grade with the highest point of the residence at 97.95 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL).

The project meets three thresholds for the requirement of a DRP, including: 1) grading in excess of 100 cubic yards; 2) construction in excess of 60 percent of the maximum allowable floor area; and 3) construction of a second story that exceeds 35 percent of the floor area of the first floor. The project requires a SDP because the proposed development exceeds 16 feet in height above the existing grade.

May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 2 of 14 ends

The issue before the Council is whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Applicant’s request as contained in Resolution 2022-049 (Attachment 1).

DISCUSSION:

The 6,120 square-foot lot is located on the east side of Pacific Avenue, three properties north of the intersection of Pacific Avenue and Solana Vista Drive. The property is relatively flat beginning at the public right-of-way and eastward surrounding the existing building pad, but steps down approximately six feet beyond a retaining wall in the rear (east) yard. The topography steps down further beyond the rear property line to the lower lots along the west side of North Acacia Avenue. The topography is similar on both adjacent properties on Pacific Avenue. The property is currently accessed by a gated driveway at the front property line.

The Applicants are requesting approval of a DRP, SDP, and SDP Waiver to demolish the existing residence and yard improvements (except for the existing perimeter walls), construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with a basement and an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements including grading, a spa, hardscape, entry gates, and landscaping. The project plans are included in Attachment 2.

Table 1 (below) provides a comparison of the SBMC applicable zoning regulations with the Applicant’s proposed design.

Table 1

LOT INFORMATION
Property Address:

Lot Size:

Max. Allowable Floor Area:

Proposed Floor Area:

Below Max. Floor Area by:

Max. Allowable Height:

Max. Proposed Height:

Highest Point/Ridge:

Overlay Zone(s):
506 Pacific Ave.
6,120 sf
3,021 sf
2,944 sf
77 sf
25 ft

24.87 ft

97.95 MSL
SROZ
Zoning Designation:
# Units Allowed:
# Units Requested:

MR (5-7 du/ac)
1 SFR, 1 ADU, 1JADU
1 SFR
Setbacks: (d) Required Proposed
Front (W) 25 ft 25.7 ft
Interior Side (N) 5 ft 5.6 ft
Interior Side (S) 5 ft 5.8 ft
Rear (E) 25 ft 26.8 ft

PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION
Proposed Floor Area Breakdown: Required Permits:

DRP: grading in excess of 100 cubic yards;
construction that exceeds 60% of the maximum
allowable floor area; and construction of a second
story that exceeds 35% of the first floor.

SDP: a new structure that exceeds 16 feet in
height from the existing grade.

SDP Waiver: proposed structure located outside
of the story pole envelope noticed to neighbors.

First Floor Living Area
Second Floor Living Area
Attached Garage
Basement Living Area
1,388 sf
1,508 sf
448 sf
1,274 sf
Subtotal
Off-Street Parking Exemption
SROZ Basement Exemption
4,618 sf
- 400 sf
- 1,274 sf
Total Proposed Floor Area: 2,944 sf
Proposed Grading: 40 CY of cut and 40 CY of fill outside of the structure; 750 CY of cut for the basement; 50 CY of excavation for footings; 880 CY of removal and recompaction; an aggregate grading quantity of 1,760 CY; and 800 CY of export off site
May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 3 of 14 ends

Proposed Parking: 2 Garage
Proposed Fences and Walls: Yes
Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit: No
Proposed Accessory Structure: No
Existing Development:

Single-story, single-family residence with
attached one-car garage to be demolished
Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the DRP in the attached Resolution 2022- 049 for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report. Findings for approval of the SDP are left blank in the drafted Resolution of Approval. The applicable SBMC sections are provided in italicized text and recommended conditions of approval from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Departments are incorporated in the Resolution of Approval. The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the Public Hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

The following is a discussion of the findings for a DRP as each applies to the proposed project as well as references to recommended conditions of approval contained in Resolution 2022-049.

Development Review Permit Compliance (SBMC Section 17.68.40):

A DRP is required because the proposed development includes grading in excess of 100 cubic yards, construction of a residence in excess of 60 percent of the maximum allowable floor area for the property, and construction of a second story that exceeds 35 percent of the first floor. In addition to meeting zoning requirements, the project must also be found in compliance with development review criteria. The following is a list of the development review criteria topics:

1. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses

2. Building and Structure Placement

3. Landscaping

4. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking, and Storage Areas

5. Grading

6. Lighting

7. Usable Open Space
The Council may approve, or conditionally approve, a DRP only if all of the findings listed below can be made. Resolution 2022-049 provides the full discussion of the findings.

1. The proposed development is consistent with the general plan and all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.

2. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria.

3. All required permits and approvals issued by the city, including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 4 of 14 ends

permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

4. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicants obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

If the above findings cannot be made, the Council shall deny the DRP. The following is a discussion of the applicable development review criteria as they relate to the proposed project.

Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses:

The property is located within the MR Zone. Surrounding properties are also located within the MR Zone and are developed with a mixture of one- and two-story single-family residences. The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the MR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and 17.12.020. The property is designated Medium Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residences developed at a maximum density of five to seven dwelling units per acre. The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ. The project has been evaluated and could be found to be in conformance with the regulations of the SROZ. The project is also located within the Coastal Zone. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant will be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver, or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of building or grading permits.

Building and Structure Placement:

The Applicants are proposing to demolish the existing residence and construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence with basement and an attached two-car garage, and perform associated improvements. The project would be located in the buildable area of the lot and the driveway access would be maintained from Pacific Avenue along the portion of the front (west) property line.

The 1,388 square-foot first floor would consist of the main entry, a media room with a wet bar, a laundry room, two bedrooms with a shared Jack-and-Jill bathroom, a bedroom with an ensuite bathroom, an office, and access to an attached two-car garage. The 1,508 square-foot second floor would consist of an open-concept living room, dining room, and May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 5 of 14 ends

kitchen that would open to a terrace (balcony) wrapping around the majority of the second floor, a powder room, and the primary bedroom suite with a private balcony located on the southern portion of the west side of the residence. There would be a two-tiered spa located in the northeast corner of the rear yard, a fire pit and additional seating areas in the southern portion of the rear yard, a storage area for trash and recycle in the northern side yard, and a covered porch below the primary bedroom balcony in the southwest portion of the buildable area.

According to the SROZ, the proposed subterranean basement is considered “BasementNo Exposed Sides” in which the basement living area can be exempt from the calculation of floor area if there are no exposed sides. A building side is considered exposed when the finished floor of the living area directly above the basement (at any point) is more than three feet above the adjacent natural or finished grade, whichever is lower. Currently, the plans show a basement with no exposure; therefore, the proposed basement living area of 1,274 square feet would be exempt from the calculation of floor area.

The SBMC parking regulations require two off-street parking spaces per single-family residence. When required spaces are provided in a garage, 200 square feet of floor area is exempted for each required space. The proposed 448 square-foot attached garage would provide two unobstructed parking spaces; therefore, 400 square feet of the garage is exempt from the calculation of floor area.

The maximum allowable floor area calculation for this project, pursuant to the provisions of the SROZ, is as follows:

0.50 for first 6,000 ft2

0.175 for 6,000 to 15,000 ft2
3,000 ft2
21 ft2
Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 3,021 ft2
As designed, the project complies with all required setbacks under the designation “D” on the City’s official Zoning Map. The residence would be setback at least 25 feet from the front (west) property line, 5 feet from the northern side property line, 26 feet from the rear (east) property line, and 5 feet from the southern side property line. The maximum building height for the MR Zone is 25 feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence would be 24.87 feet above the proposed grade with the highest portion of the structure to be at

97.95 feet above MSL. As designed, the project will comply with the required parking, maximum floor area, required setbacks, and maximum building height.

Neighborhood Comparison:

Staff compared the proposed project to 29 other properties within the surrounding area.

This area includes properties on the north and south sides of Pacific Avenue, the west side of North Acacia Avenue, both sides of Solana Vista Drive, and one property on the north side of West Cliff Street, as shown on the map on the following page.

May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 6 of 14 ends

The properties evaluated in this
comparison are also located in the LR
Zone. The existing homes range in size
from 778 square feet to 4,897 square feet,
according to the County Assessor records.

It should be noted that the County
Assessor does not include the garage,
covered porch area, unfinished basement,
or non-habitable accessory building area
in the total square footage. Accordingly,
the building area of the proposed project
has been calculated for comparison
purposes by deleting the area of the
proposed garage and the outdoor covered
area. Comparatively, the project would be
2,896 square feet (see below).

Project Gross Building Area: 4,618 ft2
Delete Attached Garage: - 448 ft2
Delete Basement: - 1,274 ft2
Project Area for Comparison to Assessor’s Data: 2,896 ft2 Table 2 is based upon the County Assessor’s data and SanGIS data. It contains neighboring lot sizes, the square footage of existing development and the maximum allowable square footage for potential development on each lot.

Table 2
# Property Address
Lot Size in
ft2
(GIS)
Existing ft2
Onsite
(Assessor’s)
Proposed /
Recently
Approved ft2
Max.

Allowable ft2 Zone
1 502 Pacific Ave 5,411 2,245 2,706 MR
2 504 Pacific Ave 5,593 2,730 2,979 MR
3 506 Pacific Ave 6,120 1,540 2,896 3,021 MR
4 508 Pacific Ave 6,962 778 3,168 MR
5 510 Pacific Ave 7,235 2,447 3,216 MR
6 512 Pacific Ave 6,731 1,414 3,128 MR
7 514 Pacific Ave 7,339 1,542 3,234 MR
8 501 Pacific Ave 6,238 1,426 3,216 MR
9 503 Pacific Ave 6,441 1,610 3,234 MR
10 505 Pacific Ave 5,321 1,994 3,128 MR
11 509 Pacific Ave 8,479 2,480 3,256 MR
12 517 Pacific Ave 10,686 2,912 3,442 MR
13 516 Pacific Ave 6,750 1,827 3,131 MR
14 520 Pacific Ave 6,808 4,601 3,164 MR
15 524 Pacific Ave 7,049 4,897 3,184 MR
May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 7 of 14 ends

16 528 Pacific Ave 5,963 2,647 2,982 MR
17 202 Solana Vista Dr 5,355 1,718 2,678 MR
18 204 Solana Vista Dr 5,346 1,661 2,673 MR
19 507 N Acacia Ave 5,500 1,143 2,750 MR
20 511 N Acacia Ave 5,800 3,761 2,900 MR
21 515 N Acacia Ave 6,200 3,866 3,035 MR
22 519 N Acacia Ave 6,400 2,145 3,070 MR
23 475 Pacific Ave 8,449 4,753 3,442 MR
24 423 Pacific Ave 7,460 988 3,256 MR
25 424 Pacific Ave 7,100 1,026 3,193 MR
26 215 Solana Vista Dr 6,030 1,080 3,005 MR
27 209 Solana Vista Dr 5,745 1,076 2,873 MR
28 423 N Acacia Ave 6,167 3,238 3,029 MR
27 420 Pacific Ave 7,596 1,986 3,053 MR
28 414 Pacific Ave 6,304 3,155 3,053 MR
29 408 Pacific Ave 6,235 2,165 3,041 MR
30 230 W Cliff St 8,376 2,061 3,416 MR
Fences, Walls and Retaining Walls:

Within the front yard setback, the SBMC Section 17.20.040(O) allows fences and walls, or any combination thereof, to be no higher than 42 inches in height as measured from existing grade, except for an additional 2 feet that is at least 80% open to light. Fences, walls and retaining walls located within the rear and interior side yards are allowed to be up to 6 feet in height with an additional 2 feet that is 50% open to light and air.

The Applicants are proposing to maintain the existing site walls that enclose the private yard, remove the existing driveway gate, and construct new columns and walls to frame the driveway and entry walkway in the front-yard setback. Additional gates would be constructed in the side yards to secure the private yard and comply with pool safety requirements. Currently, the plans show fences and walls that comply with the requirements of SBMC 17.20.040(O) and 17.60.070(C). If the Applicants decide to modify any of the proposed fences and walls or construct additional fences and walls on the project site, a condition of project approval indicates that they would be required to be in compliance with the Municipal Code.

Landscape:

Page 8 of 14 ends

detailed construction landscape drawings that will be reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect for conformance with the conceptual plan. In addition, the City’s thirdparty landscape architect will perform an inspection during the construction phase of the project. A separate condition has been added to require that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water-conserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.

Parking:

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a single-family residence. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 448 square-foot attached garage in the northwest corner of the proposed residence. The garage would be accessed by a driveway on the northwest corner of the property from Pacific Avenue. The proposed two-car garage satisfies the required offstreet parking for the single-family residence.

Grading:

The Applicants are proposing approximately 40 cubic yards of cut and 40 cubic yards of fill outside of the footprint of the structure, 750 cubic yards of excavation for the basement, 50 cubic yards of excavation for footings, 880 cubic yards of removal and recompaction, an aggregate grading quantity of 1,760 cubic yards, and 800 cubic yards of export off site.

The proposed grading outside the footprint of the structure would level the existing flat yard areas surrounding the residence and construct drainage improvements including bio retention basins located in the rear yard. The majority of the proposed grading would be associated with the excavation for the proposed 1,274 square-foot basement that would have a finished floor approximately 10 feet below the finished floor of the first floor and the finished grade of the yard areas.

Lighting:

A condition of project approval requires that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

Usable Open Space:

The project consists of the construction of a replacement single-family residence with basement and an attached garage and associated site improvements on a developed residential lot, therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section 17.20.040. As a condition of project approval, the Applicants will be required to pay the applicable Park Development Fee May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 9 of 14 ends

Structure Development Permit Compliance:

The proposed structure exceeds 16 feet in height above the existing grade, therefore, the project must comply with all of the View Assessment requirements of SBMC Chapter

17.63 and the Applicants were required to complete the SDP process. The original Story Pole Height Certification was certified by a licensed land surveyor on April 12, 2021, showing a maximum building height of 24.95 feet (98.03 feet above MSL) above the proposed grade. Notices were mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site establishing a deadline to file for View Assessment by June 3, 2021.

The City received one application for View Assessment (Attachment 3) from the property owner (Kathy de Paolo; “Claimant”) of 504 Ford Avenue, which is located immediately south of the subject property.

The project was presented to the View Assessment Commission (VAC) on August 17, 2021. Three out of the six participating VAC members found the primary bedroom to be the primary viewing area, two VAC members found the roof deck to be the primary viewing area, one VAC member found the second-floor deck to be the primary viewing area, and one VAC member was disqualified due to a real property interest within 500-feet of the subject property. The majority of the participating VAC members (five out of six) were unable to make finding 3. Approved minutes from the August 17, 2021 meeting are included in Attachment 4. Table 3 below includes the disclosures and findings from the August 17, 2021 meeting.

Table 3
Kathy de Paolo
504 Pacific Ave
Coad Bishop Cohen Moldenhauer Stribling Zajac Najjar
Date
Visited
Claimant 8/13 8/17 8/17 8/9 & 8/15 8/9 8/9
Applicant 8/12 8/16 8/17 8/9 8/9 8/9 & 8/13
Primary
Viewing Area Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Roof Deck 2nd Floor Deck Roof Deck #1. Communication
Taken Place Y Y Y Y Y Y
#2. No Public View
Impairment Y Y Y Y Y Y
#3. Designed to Minimize
View Impairment N N N N N Y
#4. No Cumulative View
Impairment Y Y Y N Y Y
#5. Neighborhood
Compatibility Y Y Y N Y N
At the Applicants’ request, the VAC continued the project until the November 16, 2021 VAC meeting. However, the Applicants continued to revise the design and requested the VAC hearing to be continued until December 21, 2021. The December 21, 2021 meeting was cancelled due to a lack of quorum. The revised project was heard at the January 18, 2022 VAC meeting.

May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 10 of 14 ends

Updated story poles were installed and certified to reflect the revised design. The story poles were certified on December 7, 2021 and include a maximum building height of 24.87 feet (97.95 feet above MSL) above proposed grade. The Applicants presented the following changes to the project at the January 18, 2022 VAC meeting:
• Reduced the size of the roof deck;
• Removed the roof deck storage on the east side of the deck; • Lowered the roof deck stair tower and moved it east by one foot; • Reduced the roof pitch on the south side of the structure; • Reduced the second story massing by pulling the southern wall 18 inches to the north, the eastern wall 18 inches to the west, and the western wall 18 inches to the east; and • Changes to the southern side of the structure, including the addition of frosted glass windows and railings, raised windowsill heights, and exterior siding.

The VAC was unable to make the required findings to approve the revised project. The minutes for the January 18, 2022 meeting have yet to be approved by the VAC. Table 4 below includes a draft of the disclosures and findings from the January 18, 2022 VAC meeting.

Table 4
Kathy de Paolo
504 Pacific Ave
Coad Bishop Cohen Moldenhauer Stribling Zajac Najjar
Date
Visited
Claimant 1/14 1/17 1/18 1/17 1/17 1/14
Applicant 8/12 8/16 1/18 1/17 1/17 8/09 &
8/13
Primary
Viewing Area
Master
Bedroom
Master
Bedroom
Master
Bedroom
Master
Bedroom
Master
Bedroom
Deck
Roof deck
#1. Communication
Taken Place Y Y Y Y Y Y
#2. No Public View
Impairment Y Y Y Y Y Y
#3. Designed to Minimize
View Impairment N N N N Y Y
#4. No Cumulative View
Impairment Y Y N Y Y Y
#5. Neighborhood
Compatibility Y Y Y Y Y N
The majority of the participating VAC members found the primary viewing area to be the primary bedroom. The majority of the VAC were unable to make finding 3; that the project was designed to minimize view impairment. When offered a continuance, the Applicant did not consent and instead requested that the VAC make a recommendation. Chair Cohen made a motion to recommend denial of the project which was seconded by Commissioner Coad. The motion passed 5/1/1 Ayes: Cohen, Bishop, Coad, Moldenhauer, Najjar. Noes: Zajac. Absent: Stribling due to a real property interest within 500-feet of the subject property. The Notice of Recommendation is included in Attachment 5.

The Applicants have proposed the following additional changes to the project since the January 18, 2022 VAC meeting:

May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 11 of 14 ends

• Removed the roof deck stair tower;
• Removed the southeast corner of the second story and revised the associated roof over the southern portion of the second story;
• Added approximately 50 square feet of floor area on the northern side of the second story.

The revised Project Plans dated April 18, 2022 are included in Attachment 2. The 50 square-foot addition to the dining room on the second story would be located outside of the original story pole envelope that was noticed to neighbors for the 30-day deadline for View Assessment applications in May of 2021. In addition to approval of the DRP and SDP, therefore, the Applicants are requesting City Council approval of an SDP Waiver to waive the requirement that the new massing be noticed again to the neighbors. The Applicants provided a request for approval which is included in Attachment 6.

The City Council should consider the recommendation from VAC, the information provided by the Applicants and Claimant, and the View Assessment Ordinance (SBMC

17.63) including the definition of a “Viewing Area” and the five required findings, which are provided below:

SBMC Section 17.63.020(I): “Viewing area” shall be that area of the structure (excluding bathrooms, hallways, garages or closets) or lot (excluding the building setback areas) where the view assessment committee, or the city council on appeal, determines the best and most important view exists. The finished floor elevation of any viewing area must be at or above existing grade adjacent to the exterior wall of the part of the building nearest to that viewing area. The determination shall be made by balancing the nature of the view to be protected and the importance of the area of the structure or lot from where the view is taken.

SBMC Section 17.63.040(F): Findings. In making a decision on a matter for which view assessment has been requested, the view assessment committee shall be required to make the following findings:

1. The applicant for the structure development permit has made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the person(s) requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary offer to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues.

2. The proposed structure does not significantly impair a view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bike ways, walkways, equestrian trails) which has been identified in the city’s general plan, local coastal program, or city designated viewing areas.

May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 12 of 14 ends

3. The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

4. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application. Cumulative view impairment shall be determined by: (a) Considering the amount of view impairment caused by the proposed structure; and (b) considering the amount of view impairment that would be caused by the construction on other parcels of structures similar to the proposed structure.

5. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

A condition of approval has been added to the Draft Resolution of Approval (Attachment 1) to require that the Applicants submit a height certification prepared by a licensed land surveyor prior to the framing inspection certifying that the maximum height of the proposed addition will not exceed 24.87 feet above the proposed grade or 97.95 feet above MSL, which is the maximum proposed structure height reflected on the project plans, should the City Council make the necessary finding to approve the project.

The Draft Resolution of Approval (Attachment 1) reflects the Applicant’s request that the City Council consider the findings of the SDP and includes findings in support of the DRP.

The Draft Resolution of Approval includes the applicable SBMC sections in italicized text and the recommended conditions of approval from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Departments. An additional condition of approval requires that the Applicants obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of Building or Grading Permits. The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the public hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

Property Frontage and Public Right-of-Way Improvements
The existing property frontage is improved with a concrete curb, gutter, and five-foot wide sidewalk. If approved, the Applicant will be required to improve the existing concrete curb along the entire property frontage. An Encroachment Maintenance Removal Agreement (EMRA) will be required for the pavers, turf, landscaping, and gravel area located behind the existing concrete sidewalk in the public right-of-way. The Applicants will also be required to construct a new Americans with Disability Act (ADA) standard driveway approach. There is an existing 12-foot-wide sewer easement located along the south property line. No further improvements are required in the easement as this sewer line was rehabilitated in 2013.

May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 13 of 14 ends

Public Hearing Notice:

Notice of the City Council Public Hearing for the project was published in the Union Tribune more than 10 days prior to the public hearing. The same public notice was mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project site on April 28, 2022. The neighbor located immediately to the south at 504 Pacific Avenue, Kathy de Paolo, has raised concerns with the proposed project, including filing for View Assessment. Correspondence from de Paolo is included in Attachment 7. Two additional neighbors (Metcalfs at 508 Pacific Avenue and Mitchells at 505 Pacific Avenue) provided support of the SDP Waiver (Attachment 8).

In conclusion, the proposed project, as conditioned, could be found to be consistent with the Zoning regulations and the General Plan. Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the project in the attached Resolution 2022-049 for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report. Conditions from the Community Development, Engineering, and Fire Departments are incorporated in the Resolution of Approval.

The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the Public Hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Examples of this exemption include one single-family residence or second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three-single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Approve Staff recommendation adopting the attached Resolution 2022-049. ∙ Approve Staff recommendation subject to additional specific conditions necessary for the City Council to make all required findings for the approval of a DRP and SDP. ∙ Deny the project if all required findings for the DRP and SDP cannot be made.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

May 11 2022
DRP20-014/SDP20-020
506 Pacific Ave – Boyd Residence

Page 14 of 14 ends

The proposed project meets the minimum zoning requirements under the SBMC, may be found to be consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP.

Therefore, should the City Council be able to make the findings to approve the SDP, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-049

2. Project Plans Dated April 18, 2022

3. De Paolo Application for View Assessment

4. VAC Minutes from August 17, 2021 Meeting

5. NOR from January 18, 2022 VAC Meeting

6. Applicant’s Request for Approval

7. Correspondence – De Paolo at 504 Pacific Ave

8. Correspondence – Metcalf (508) and Mitchell (505)
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-049

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT,

STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, AND STRUCTURE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WAIVER TO DEMOLISH A SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCE, CONSTRUCT A REPLACEMENT TWOSTORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A BASEMENT

AND AN ATTACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE, AND PERFORM
ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT 506 PACIFIC

AVENUE, SOLANA BEACH
APPLICANT: JIM AND KATHLEEN BOYD
CASE NO.: DRP20-014/SDP20-020
WHEREAS, Jim and Kathleen Boyd (hereinafter referred to as “Applicants”), have submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the View Assessment Committee recommended denial of the project on January 18, 2022 based on an Application for View Assessment from 506 Pacific Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on May 11, 2022, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined the primary viewing area to be ____________; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

I. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

II. That the request for a DRP and SDP to demolish a single-story single-family residence, construct a replacement 2,986 square-foot, two-story single-family residence with a 1,274 square-foot basement and an attached 448 square-foot twocar garage, and perform associated site improvements and the request for a SDP Waiver to construct approximately 50 square feet of additional floor area outside of Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 2 of 14 ends

the original story pole envelope at 506 Pacific Avenue is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

III. FINDINGS
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

General Plan Consistency: The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City’s General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residential development with a maximum density of five to seven dwelling units per acre. The development is also consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SBMC 17.20.030 and

17.48.040), which delineates maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR), Permitted Uses and Structures (SBMC Section 17.20.020) which provides for uses of the property for a single-family residence. Further, the project adheres to all property development regulations established for the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and cited by SBMC Section 17.020.030.

The project is meets the minimum number of off-street parking spaces and the required front-, side- and rear-yard setbacks and is below the maximum allowable structure height and gross floor area for the property.

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

17.68.040.F:
a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses: The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and complementary to existing development in the immediate vicinity of the project site and the surrounding neighborhood. The development as
proposed shall also be compatible in scale, apparent bulk, and massing with such existing development in the surrounding neighborhood. Site planning on or near the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects.

Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 3 of 14 ends

17.20.010 and 17.12.020. The property is designated Medium Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for singlefamily residences developed at a maximum density of five to seven dwelling units per acre. The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated
neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ and within the Coastal Zone. The project has been evaluated, and is in conformance with, the regulations of the SROZ. As a condition of project approval, the Applicants are required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed to minimize adverse impacts on the surrounding properties and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhance their intended use and complement existing site topography. Multi-family residential buildings shall be sited to avoid crowding and to allow for a functional use of the space between buildings.

The 1,274 square-foot basement would consist of a game room with a wet bar, two bedrooms each with ensuite bathrooms and emergency egress through a lightwell on the northern side of the structure, a mechanical room and stairway access to the first floor. The 1,388 square-foot first floor would consist of the main entry, a media room with a wet bar, a laundry room, two bedrooms with a shared Jack-and-Jill bathroom, a bedroom with an ensuite bathroom, an office, and access to an attached two- Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 4 of 14 ends

car garage. The 1,508 square-foot second floor would consist of an open-concept living room, dining room and kitchen that would open to a terrace (balcony) wrapping around the majority of the second floor, a powder room, and the primary bedroom suite with a private balcony located on the southern portion of the west side of the residence. There would be a two-tiered spa located in the northeast corner of the rear yard, a fire pit and additional seating areas in the southern portion of the rear yard, a storage area for trash and recycle in the northern side yard, and a covered porch below the primary bedroom balcony in the
southwest portion of the buildable area.

According to the SROZ, the proposed subterranean basement is considered “Basement- No Exposed Sides” in which the basement living area can be exempt from the calculation of floor area if there are no exposed sides. A building side is considered exposed when the finished floor of the living area directly above the basement (at any point) is more than three feet above the adjacent natural or finished grade, whichever is lower. Currently, the plans show a basement with no exposure; therefore, the proposed basement living area of 1,274 square feet would be exempt from the calculation of floor area.

The SBMC parking regulations require two off-street parking spaces per single-family residence. When required spaces are provided in a garage, 200 square feet of floor area is exempted for each required space. The proposed 448 square-foot attached garage would provide two unobstructed parking spaces;
therefore, 400 square feet of the garage is exempt from the calculation of floor area.

With the basement exemption (1,274 square feet) and the garage exemption (400 square feet), the total proposed floor area would be 2,944 square feet, which is 77 square feet below the maximum allowable floor area for the 6,120 square-foot lot located in the SROZ. The maximum allowable floor area
calculation for this project, pursuant to the provisions of the SROZ, is as follows:

0.500 for first 6,000 ft2 3,000 ft2

0.175 for 6,001 – 15,000 ft2 21 ft2
Total Allowable Floor Area: 3,021 ft2
As designed, the project complies with all required setbacks under the designation “D” on the City’s official Zoning Map. The residence would be setback at least 25 feet from the front (west) property line, 5 feet from the northern side property line, 26 feet from the rear (east) property line, and 5 feet from the southern Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 5 of 14 ends

side property line. The maximum building height for the MR Zone is 25 feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence would be 24.87 feet above the proposed grade with the highest portion of the structure to be at 97.95 feet above MSL. As designed, the project will comply with the required parking, maximum floor area, required setbacks, and maximum building height.
c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. To the maximum extent practicable, landscaping and plantings shall be used to screen parking areas, storage areas, access roads, and other service uses of the site. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

Drought tolerant plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into all landscaping plans.

The project is subject to the current water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. A Landscape
Documentation Package is required for new development
projects with an aggregate landscape equal to or greater than 500 square feet requiring a building permit, plan check or development review. The Applicants provided a conceptual landscape plan that has been reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect, who has recommended approval. The
Applicants will be required to submit detailed construction landscape drawings that will be reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect for conformance with the conceptual plan. In addition, the City’s third-party landscape architect will perform an inspection during the construction phase of the project. A separate condition has been added to require that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and waterconserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways. Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view, to the extent feasible, by existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a singlefamily residence. The Applicants are proposing to construct a 448 square-foot attached garage in the northwest corner of the proposed residence. The garage would be accessed by a
Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 6 of 14 ends

driveway on the northwest corner of the property from Pacific Avenue. The proposed two-car garage satisfies the required offstreet parking for the single-family residence. e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

The project includes approximately 40 cubic yards of cut and 40 cubic yards of fill outside of the footprint of the structure, 750 cubic yards of excavation for the basement, 50 cubic yards of excavation for footings, 880 cubic yards of removal and recompaction, which is an aggregate grading quantity of 1,760 cubic yards, and 800 cubic yards of export off site. The proposed grading outside the footprint of the structure will level the existing flat yard areas surrounding the residence and construct drainage improvements including bio retention basins located in the rear yard. The majority of the proposed grading is associated with the excavation for the proposed 1,274 square-foot basement that will have a finished floor approximately 10 feet below the finished floor of the first floor and the finished grade of the yard areas. f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding areas per SBMC 17.60.060 (Exterior Lighting Regulations).

All new exterior lighting fixtures shall comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC

17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area. g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.

The project consists of the construction of a replacement singlefamily residence with a basement, an attached garage, and associated site improvements on a developed residential lot, Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 7 of 14 ends

therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section

17.20.040.

III. All required permits and approvals including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

All required permits are being processed concurrently with the Development Review Permit.

IV. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicants obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

The Applicants shall obtain approval from the California Coastal Commission prior to issuance of Building or Grading Permits.

B. In accordance with Chapter 17.63 (Structure Development Permit) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The Applicant for the Structure Development Permit has made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the person(s) requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary offer to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues.

To be completed based on Council findings.

II. The proposed structure does not significantly impair a view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bike ways, walkways, equestrian trails) which has been identified in the city’s general plan, local coastal program, or city designated viewing areas.

To be completed based on Council findings.

III. The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

To be completed based on Council findings.

IV. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application. Cumulative view impairment shall be determined by: (a) Considering the amount of view impairment caused by the proposed structure; and (b) considering the amount of view impairment that would Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 8 of 14 ends

be caused by the construction on other parcels of structures similar to the proposed structure.

To be completed based on Council findings.

V. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

To be completed based on Council findings.

IV. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. The Applicants shall pay required Fire Mitigation, Park Development and Public Use Facilities Impact Fees, as established by SBMC Chapter 15.60, Chapter 15.65, Chapter 15.66, and Resolution 2018- 147.

II. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the architectural plans presented to the City Council on May 11, 2022, and located in the project file with a submittal date of February 18, 2022.

III. Prior to requesting a framing inspection, the Applicants shall be required to submit a height certification, signed by a licensed land surveyor, certifying that the building envelope is in conformance with City Council approval on May 11, 2022, and that the maximum height of the proposed addition will not exceed 24.87 feet above the proposed grade or 97.95 feet above MSL, which is the maximum proposed structure height reflected on the project plans.

IV. Any proposed onsite fences, walls and retaining walls and any proposed railing located on top, or any combination thereof, shall comply with applicable regulations of SBMC Section 17.20.040 and

17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).

V. The Applicants shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.

VI. Native or drought tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into any proposed landscaping and compatible with the surrounding area to the extent feasible.

Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 9 of 14 ends

VII. Any new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the CityWide Lighting Regulations of SBMC 17.60.060.

VIII. All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities that render them detrimental to the surrounding area.

IX. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all times when feasible. If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicants shall ensure construction vehicles are parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on Pacific Avenue and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.

X. The Applicants shall connect to temporary electrical service as soon as feasible to the satisfaction of the City.

B. Fire Department Conditions:

I. ACCESS ROAD MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed improved width of not less than 20 feet; curb line to curb line, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Exception: Single-Family residential driveways; serving no more than two single-family dwellings, shall have minimum of 16 feet, curb line to curb line, of unobstructed improved width. Access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of not less than 75,000 pounds and shall be provided with an approved paved surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities.

II. OBSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION: All
roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width during construction and maintained free and clear, including the parking of vehicles, in accordance with the California Fire Code and the Solana Beach Fire Department.

III. ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers
and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background and shall meet the following minimum standards as to size: 4 inches high with a ½ inch stroke width for residential buildings, 8 inches high with a ½ inch stroke for commercial and multi-family residential buildings, and 12 inches high with a 1-inch stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers.

Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 10 of 14 ends

IV. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS SYSTEM-ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS: Structures shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.

V. CLASS “A” ROOF: All structures shall be provided with a Class “A” Roof covering to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department.

VI. BASEMENT:
a. All basements shall be designed and equipped with emergency exit systems consisting of operable windows, window wells or exit doors that lead directly outside via staircase and exit door or exit door at grade.
b. Window wells/light wells that intrude into side yard or backyard setbacks of five feet or less, shall require a hinged grating covering the window well/lightwell opening. The grating shall be capable of supporting a weight of 250lb person; yet must be able to be opened by someone of minimal strength with no special knowledge, effort or use of key or tool. Any modification of previously approved plans related to this condition shall be subject to re-submittal and review by City Staff (Fire, Building, Planning).

C. Engineering Department Conditions:

I. The Applicants are required to obtain an Encroachment Permit in accordance with SBMC Section 11.20 for the below frontage improvements being done in the public right-of-way. The frontage improvements shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the proposed project:
a. Construction of the proposed SDRSD G-14A driveway approach. b. Construction of the proposed pavers.
c. Construction of the proposed gravel.
d. Construction of the proposed artificial turf.

II. The Applicants shall record the Encroachment Maintenance Removal Agreement (EMRA) with the County of San Diego prior to the release of the Grading Bond and Security Deposit. The EMRA shall be recorded against this property for all private improvements in the public right-of-way including, but not limited to:
a. Proposed pavers.

Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 11 of 14 ends

b. Proposed gravel.
c. Proposed artificial turf.
d. Proposed private improvements in the sewer easements.

III. The Applicants shall record a Hold Harmless Agreement prior to Final Inspection of the Building Permit. The document will hold the City of Solana Beach harmless resulting from any backflow from sewer on the Applicants’ property. The Applicants shall record the Hold Harmless Agreement document prior to Final Inspection of the Building Permit.

IV. Submit proof to the Engineering Department that the required California Coastal Commission permits have been obtained prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits.

V. All construction demolition materials shall be recycled according to the City’s Construction and Demolition recycling program and an approved Waste Management Plan shall be submitted.

VI. Construction fencing shall be located on the subject property unless the Applicants have obtained an Encroachment Permit in accordance with chapter 11.20 of the SBMC which allows otherwise.

GRADING:

I. Obtain a Grading Permit in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code. Conditions prior to the issuance of a grading permit shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. The Applicants shall obtain a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. Onsite grading design and construction shall be in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code.
b. The Applicants shall obtain a Soils Report prepared by a Registered Soils Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. All necessary measures shall be taken and implemented to assure slope stability, erosion control and soil integrity. The Grading Plan shall incorporate all recommendations contained in the soils report. c. The Applicants shall provide a Drainage Report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. This report shall address the design for detention basin and corresponding outflow system to ensure the rate of runoff for the proposed development is at or below that of pre-existing condition. All recommendations of this report shall be incorporated into the Preliminary Grading Plan. A detention basin easement(s) shall be recorded for maintenance of the detention Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 12 of 14 ends

basins by the property owner(s) in perpetuity, prior to Final Inspection of the Building Permit.
d. The Applicants shall show all retaining walls and drainage structures. Retaining walls shown on the grading plan shall conform to the San Diego Regional Standards or be designed by a licensed civil engineer. Engineering calculations for all designed walls with a surcharge and nonstandard walls shall be submitted at grading plan check. Retaining walls may not exceed the allowable height within the property line setback as determined by the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code. Contact the Community
Development department for further information.
e. The Applicants are responsible to protect the adjacent properties during construction. If any grading, construction activity, access or potential construction-related impacts are anticipated beyond the property lines, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicants shall obtain a letter of permission from the adjoining property owners. All required letters of permission shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the grading permit. f. The Applicants shall pay a grading plan check fee in accordance with the current Engineering Fee Schedule at initial grading plan submittal. Inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the grading permit.
g. The Applicants shall obtain and submit grading security in a form prescribed by the City Engineer.
h. The Applicants shall obtain haul permit for import / export of soil.

The Applicants shall transport all excavated material to a legal disposal site.
i. The Applicants shall submit certification from the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer that all public or private drainage facilities and finished grades are functioning and are installed in accordance with the approved plans. This shall be accomplished by the Engineer of Record incorporating as-built conditions on the Mylar grading plans and obtaining signatures of the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer certifying the as-built conditions. j. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan shall be prepared by the Applicants. Best management practices shall be developed and implemented to manage storm water and non-storm water discharges from the site at all times during excavation and grading activities. Erosion prevention shall be emphasized as the most important measure for keeping sediment on site during excavation and grading activities. Sediment controls shall be used Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 13 of 14 ends

as a supplement to erosion prevention for keeping sediment on site.
k. The Applicants shall show all proposed on-site private drainage facilities intended to discharge water run-off. Elements of this design shall include a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities and identify any easements or structures required to properly convey the drainage. The construction of drainage structures shall comply with the standards set forth by the San Diego Regional Standard Drawings.
l. Post Construction Best Management Practices meeting City and RWQCB Order No. R9-2013-001 requirements shall be
implemented in the drainage design.
m. No increased cross lot drainage shall be allowed.
n. The Applicants shall obtain the Grading Permit concurrently with Building Permit issuance.

D. COUNCIL CONDITIONS
I. N/A
V. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the abovementioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

VI. EXPIRATION
The Development Review Permit for the project shall expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicants have obtained building permits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council according to SBMC 17.72.110.

VII. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Applicants shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicants of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may Resolution 2022-049
DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd – 506 Pacific Ave.

Page 14 of 14 ends

elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.

In the event of such election, the Applicants shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicants regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Applicants shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicant.

NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 11th day of May, 2022, by the following vote:

SITE DATA

BUILDING ADDRESS
506 P AC IFIC AVE.

SOLANA E3E ACf-l, CA ':l2cZ>15

ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER
263 - cZ>42 - l1cZ>cZ>

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 4 , E3LOCK 3, MAF 2143

ZONE, MR

OVERLAYS, SCALED RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONE
6 ,120 5F
R-3

LOT SIZE,

OCCUPANCY TYFE,
CONSTRUCTION TYFE, V-6 SPRINKLERED (NFFA 13D!

EXISTING LIVING AREA,

EXISTING GARAGE AREA,
PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR AREA,
FROFOSED 2ND FLOOR AREA
FROFOSED E3ASEMENT AREA,

PROPOSED GARAGE AREA,
TOTAL E3U ILDING AREA,

OFF-STREET PARKING EXEMPTION,

BASEMENT AREA EXEMPTION,
TOTAL E3UILDING TOWARDS FAR
MAX ALLOWAE3LE FAR SF,

TOTAL L IVING ADDITION AREA,
TOT AL TERRACE t E3ALCONY AREA,

TOT AL ROOF DECK AREA,
4,110 5F
825 5F
2% 5F
MAX COVERAGE - NONE (NOT A STEEP f-llLLSIDE !
f-lE IGf-lT LIMIT, 25'- cZ>' MAX.

SEISMIC ZONE 4
CLIMATE ZONE 1
SETE3ACKS,

FRONT YARD

SIDE YARDS

REAR YARD

PARKING SPACES,

REQUIRED
25 '- cZ>'
5 '-cZ>'
25'- cZ> '

REQUIRED
2 EARTHWORK QUANT ITIES

PROPOSED
26 '-63/4. I
5 '-1'
26'- lcZ>'

PROVIDED
2 1,55':l 5F
118 5F

1.368 5F
l,ScZ>8 5F
1,214 5F
448 5F
4,618 5F
- 4cZ>cZ> 5F
-1214 5F 2,':144 5F
3,021 5F
(SEE PRELIMINARY GRADING FLAN FOR ADD ITIONAL INFORMATION!.

SITE GRADING (OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURE!
CUT, 4cZ> CY
FILL, 4cZ> C Y
NET, cZ> CY IMFORT/EXF ORT
EXCAVATION FOR E3ASEMENT, 150 CY ( CUT!

EX C AVATION FOR FOOTINGS 4 FOUNDATION, 5cZ> CY ( CUT!

PROJECT TEAM
OWNER/ APPL ICANT JAMES t KATf-lLEEN E3OYD
506 PACIFIC AVE.

SOLANA E3EACf-l, CA ':l2cZ>15
TEL, (858! 342 -':1002
ARCHITECT OASIS ARCf-llTECTURE t DESIGN, INC.
1015 TURQUOISE STREET
SUITE 2
SAN DIEGO, CA ':l21cZ>':l
TEL (856! 213-5632

CONT ACT, MARK MORRIS
C IVIL ENGINEER P ASCO LARET SU ITER t ASSOC.
535 N. f-llGf-lWAY lcZ>I

SUITE A
SOLANA E3EACf-l, CA ':l2cZ>15
TEL (858! 25':l-8212

CONT ACT, TYLER LAWSON
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TOPIA LANDSCAPE ARCf-llTECTURE
5055 NORTf-1 f-lARE3OR DRIVE
SUITE 2cZ>cZ>
SAN DIEGO, CA ':l21cZ>6
TEL, (858! 458- 0555
CONT ACT, FRANK MARCZYN5KI
\
\
\
\
\
\
TOTAL GRADING ( CUT t FILL OUTSIDE , E3ELOW STRUCTURE!, 6BcZ> CY ( +R4R!• CUT \ \

SHEET INDEX
AS- I
C- 1
C-2
A - I.I
A - 2.cZ>
A - 2.1
A - 2.2
A - 23
A - 3.1
A-4.I
A - 4.2
A -6.I
A - 6.2
SF- I
SF-2
SF-3
L-cZ>
L-1
L-2
L -3
L-4
L-5

SITE FLAN

PREL IMINARY GRADING FLAN

SITE SECTIONS AND DETAILS

DEMOL ITION F LAN
FROFOSED E3ASEMENT FLOOR FLAN

FROFOSED FIRST FLOOR FLAN

PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR F LAN

PROPOSED FLOOR AREA D IAGRAM

FROFOSED ROOF FLAN

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
E3UILDING SECTIONS
E3UILDING SECTIONS

STORY FOLE FLAN

STORY F OLE ELEVATIONS

LANDSCAPE COVER
LANDSCAPE NOTES t LEGEND

LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT FLAN

WATER CONSERVATION F LAN

EXISTING TREE F LAN

STREET ELEVATION
SCOPE Of= WORK D EMOLITION OF EXISTING SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE.

CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TWO-STORY OVER E3ASEMENT
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITf-1 ATTACf-lED 2-CAR
GARAGE. RESIDENCE TO INCLUDE NEW 2ND FLOOR
TERRACE AND E3ALCONY AND NEW ROOF DECK
PROJECT TO COMFL Y WITf-1 Tf-lE FOLLOWING E3UILDING CODES, 2cZ>l':l CA RESIDENTIAL CODE
201':l CA E3UILDING CODE

LIGHT UELL TO
6A&EMENT 6ELOW

WALL MOUNTED
New development projects: If aggregate landscape area > 500 sf. a landscape package is required Rehabilitated Landscape: If aggregate landscape area > 2,500 sf, a landscape package is required • A landscaped area does not include the footprint of a building, decks, patio, sidewalk, dnveway, parking lot, or other hardscape that does not meet the criteria in SSMC 17.56.150.

D An area without irrigation designated for nondevelopment such as designated open space area with existing native vegetation.
" A design element where open water performs an aesthetic or recreational function. A water feature includes a pond, lake, waterfall, fountain, artificial streams, spa and swimming pool. a Rock and stone or pervious design features, such as decomposed granite ground cover, that are adjacent to a vegetated area.
• Area of replacement and/or new irrigated landscape, water features, and/or decorative hardscape associated with the pro.feet.

NEW LAl'-ID5CAFE AfcEA

CABLE STYLE

GUARDRAIL

SPILLWAY

NEW TUJO- TIER &PA
WI VANl&I-UNG: EOOE
2cZ>l':l CA ELECTRICAL CODE
201':l CA FLUME3ING CODE
201':l CA MECf-lANICAL CODE
2cZ>l':l CA FIRE CODE COHDEN51Nes 1.••IIT ---~
2cZ>l':l CA GREEN E3U ILDING CODE
CONDEN51NC:s ~IT
HEW ~•-0• ~lui-1
FENCE AND G:A TE
EXIST. WALL

TO REMAIN

NEW EXPO&ED

AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY
WlTI-I PEBBLE BANDS

NEW STONE YENEER
DRIVEW.A Y COL~S
\
EXIST.

SIDEWALK
CE
NEW CONCR:ETE
&TEPPINCs PADS
NEW S'-0' I-IIG-1-1

FENCE AND G-A TE
D FLR:
@ SITE FLAN
=
t-e:W &TONE VENEER

PRIVACY WALL

NEW &TONE
PAVS:R& WITl4
FE86LE 6AND&
e>MP PLANTER

FER GRADING PLAN

NEW WOOD FENCE
I. SEE 514EET C - 1 FOR 5 1TE GRADING: AREAS.

2. SEE &14EET L-3 FOR WATER U&E CALCULATIONS.

3. A BACKFLOW ~VS:NTER 15 REQUIRED FOR Tl-IE &El.I.ER
LATER.ll.L SINCE Tl-IE B A&El"'ENT FINl &l-4 FLOOR 15 LOUF-R TI-IAN Tl-IE UP&TREA.M HANl40LE ELEVATION.

E9
NORTf-1
1/8' • l'- 0 '
ATTACHMENT 2
w !I)
r l) ~ ,N
z W<P
w ><{
Q <to
l) - u) -"I
w !!: l)
O<t Q(_ <tw

0... [Q
Q ,£) <t
'r ~z
() !I) <t
_j
ill C)
u)
I. DESIGN l<EYIEUI 5llll1ITTAJ..
lltl':l/212>212>

2. DEsalli£VBllo£5IB111AL
12>2 /16/212>21

3. DEsal li£VBI 1<£5181TTAL
12>4/12>6/212>21

4. DEsal li£VBI l<l:Sl.61ITTAL
11/312>/212>21

5. DEsal li£VBI 1<£5181TTAL
12>4/161212>22
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
MCOHTMC'ftlfl9ttou\ltlW'J
,u--DIISTl'IG
«lfClrll:llt'5AT"!HE5"E91J1)11[
M~-
~wmtEAOI-
,.. ... ., CHECl(f])ll'I'
ELE3 MCM
""" .... "°· 12>4/1 6/22 1005

SITE FLAN
AS-1

GENERAL NOTES

APPROVAL OF THIS GRADING PUW DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF VERTICAL OR

HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF ANY PRIVATE ROAD SHOWN HEREIN FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES

2. FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE GRADING PLANS IS SUBJECT TO FINAl.. APPROVAL OF THE ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENT Pl.ANS VIHEREAPPLICABLE FINAL CURB GRADE ELEVATION$ MAY

REQUIRE CIWIGES IN THESE PLANS

3. IMPORT MATERIALS SHALL BE LEGALLY OBTAINED.
4, A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE CITY ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK IN THE PUBLIC

RIGHT-OF-WAY

5. ALL SLOPES OVER THREE (3) FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL BE LA/,/DSCAPED AND IRRIGATED

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ALL UT fl/TIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED WORK SHALL BE GfVEN TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCtES:

8. 9.

10. 11.

12. 13.

14. 15.
16 17

18. 19.

20. UNDERGROUNDS.A (800)-221-2600

A SOILS REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT.

APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY ENGINEER DOES NOT AUTHORfZE ANY WORK OR

GRADING TO BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE PROPERTY OWNER'S PERMISSION HAS BEEN OBTAINED IWD A VALID GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

THE CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF THESE Pl.ANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE BUILDING OFFIC!AJ..'S APPROVAL OF ANY FOUNDATION FOR STRUCTURES TO BE PLACED ON THE AREA COVERED BY THESE Pl.ANS, NO WAIVER OF THE GRADING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING MINIMUM COVER OVER EXPANSfVE SOILS IS MADE OR IMPLIED.

ALL OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISES, INCLUDING THE WARMING UP, REPAIR, ARRfVAL, DEPARTURE OR RUNNING OF TRUCKS. EARTHMOVING EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

IWD ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED GRADING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE PERIOD BEPNEEN 7:00 a.m, AJ-ID 6:00 pm. EACH DAY, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, AND NO EARTHMOVING OR

GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISES ON SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS OR HOLIDAYS lVITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

ALL MAJOR SLOPES SHALL BE ROUNDED INTO EXISTING TERRAIN TO PRODUCE A CONTOURED TRANSITION FROM CUT OR Fll..L FACES TO NATURAL GROUND /WO ABUTTING CUT OR FILL FACES.

NOTWITHSTANDING THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE GRADING ORDINANCE, IWD

NOTWITHSTANDING THE APPROVAL OF THESE GRADING PLNIS, THE PERIJITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. NO PERSON SHALL EXCAVATE

ONLAHD SO CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AS TO ENDANGER ANY ADJOINING PUBLIC STREET,

SIDEWALK, ALLEY, FUNCTION OF ANY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC OR PRfVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT SUPPORTING AND PROTECTING SUCH PROPERTY FROM SETTLING, CRACKING, EROSION, SIL TING SCOUR OR OTHER DAMAGE WHICH MIGHT RESUt. T FROM THE GRADING DESCRIBED ON THIS PL»/. THE CfTYWJLt. HOLD THE PERMITTEE RESPONSfBLE FOR CORRECTION ON NON-DEDICATED IMPROVEMENTS WHICH DAMAGE ADJACENT PROPERTY.

SLOPE RATIOS: cur 2:1 FILL 2:1 (PER SOILS REPORT)
NET CUT: 20 CY NET FILL: 120 CY EXCAVATION FOR BASEMENT: 700 CY NET EXPORT: 600 CY
REMED!AJ.. GRADING: TBD (PER SOILS REPORT)
(NOTE: A SEPARATE VALID PERMIT MUST EXIST FOR OFFS/TE IMPORT OR EXPORT AREAS.) .,. THE QUANTITIES ESTIMATED AB0\11: ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS. CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE!R OWN EARTHWORK QUANTITIES.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS: tF ANY ARCHAELOGtcAL RESOURCES ARE DISCOVERED ON THE SITE OF

THIS GRADING DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, SUCH OPERATIONS WILL CEASE IMMEDIATELY, AND THE PERM/TT££ WILL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE DISC0\11:RY. GRADING OPERATIONS WILL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL THE PERM/TT££ HAS RECE/\11:D WRITTEN AUTHORITY FROM THE CITY ENGINEER TO DO SO.

ALL GRADING SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SJ-W.L BE COMPLETED AS A SINGULAR UNIT WITH NO PROVISION FOR PARTIAL RELEASES. SHOULD IT BE ANTICIPATED THAT A PORTION OF THIS

PROJECT BE COMPLETED SEPARATELY, A SEPARATE PLAN AND PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE

SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH 858.720.2470 24 HOURS BEFORE

GRADING OPERATIONS BEGIN,
FfNISHED GRADING AND Pl.ANTING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED ON ALL SLOPES PRIOR TO OCTOBER

1. OR IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF /WY SLOPES GRADED BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND APRIL t PRIOR TO ANY PWIT/NG, ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PUWNING DEPARTMENT AT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAGE, OR BY SEPARATE L»IDSCAPE PLAN ALL OFF-SIT£ HAUi. ROUTES SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF WORK.

UPON FINAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK UNDER THE GRADING PERMIT, BUT PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING APPROVAL AND/OR FINAL RELEASE OF SECURITY, AN AS.GRADED CERTIFICATE SHALL BE PROVIDED STATING: "THE GRADING UNDER PERMIT No. SBGR-216 HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN SUBSTANTfAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING Pl.AN OR AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHEDAS-GRADEDPLA!r. THIS STATEMENT SHALL BE FOLLOWED BY THE DATE AND SIGNATURE OF THE CML ENGINEER YIHO CERTIFIES SUCH A GRADING OPERATION.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES INCLUDING

SHORING, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEAL TH STANDARDS, LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

EROSION CONTROL NOTES
10 11
STORM WATER AND NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGE CONTROL: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED TO MANAGE STORM WATER AND NON.STORM WATER

DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING EXCAVATIONN-ID GRADINGACTMTIES EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL· EROSION PREVENTION SHALL BE EMPHASIZED AS THE MOST IMPORTANT MEASURE FOR KEEP!NG SEDIMENT ON SITE DURING EXCAVATION AND GRADING ACTMTl£S, SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE USED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO EROSION PREVENTION FDR KEEPING SEDIMENT ON SITE.

EROSION CONTROL ON SLOPES SHALL BE MITIGATED BY INSTALLING LANDSCAPING AS PER APPR0\11:D LANDSCAPE PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CONDfTIDNS, OR BY TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL CONFORMING TO THE FOLLO~VING
NON•IRRJGATED HYDROSEED MIX WITH A FIBER MATRIX APPLIED AT 4,000 LB/ACRE.

LBS/ACRE %PUR!TY!ACRE sEED SPECIES
-2-0 -- 70¾PLUS ~UCA
50 PL»ITAGE INSULAR/$
8 ENCELISFARINOSA
6 SCARIFIED LOTUS SCOPARIUS
7 50¾ PLUS EXCHSCHOLTZIA CALIF.

TOTAL.- 91 LBS/ ACRE
THE TOPS OF ALL SLOPES TALLER THAN 5' SHALL BE DIKED OR TRENCHED TO PREVENT WATER FLOWING 0\11:R CRESTS OF SLOPES

CATCH BASINS, DESIL TING BASINS, AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO THE

SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER
SAND BAG CHECK DAMS. SILT FENCES. FIBER ROLLS OR OTHER APPR0\11:D BMP'S SHALL BE PLACED IN UNPAVED AREAS WITH GRADIENTS IN EXCESS OF2¾, AS WELL ASAT OR NEAR EVERY POINT WHERE CONCENTRATEDFLDWLEA\11: THE SITE.

SAND BAGS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF ALL DRAINAGE INLETS TO MIN!MfZE

SILT BUILDUP IN THE INLETS AND PIPES
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY ERODED SLOPES AS DIRECTED BY THE OFFICE OF THE CfTY ENGINEER.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP ROADWAYS AND ENTRANCES TO AND FROM THE SITE ON A REGULAR BASIS TO KEEP THEM FREE OF SO!L ACCUMULATION AND AT ALL OTHER TIMES

DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER SITE ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS TO MINIMIZE AIR BORNE DUST

CREATED FROM GRADING AND HAULING OPERATIONS OR EXCESSIVE WIND CONDITIONS, AND AT ALL TIMES DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

IN THE EVENT SH. T DOES ENTER THE EX!STING PUBLIC STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, REMOVAL OF THE Sll. T FROM THE THE SYSTEM WILL BE DONE AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE.

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
506 PACIFIC A VENUE
\
\

EXCO/IC CURS&

SIDEWALK TO REMAJN

VICINITY MAP NOTTOSCALE
t
N
I
J
I

PROJECT SITE
FF= 73.75
PAO=73.08
BFF=63.52
8-VERLATERAL
NIE=58.3:

SEE NOTE BELOW
0 10 20 30
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN ,-..•r- /
I SCALE: 1"= 10'

ZONE INFORMA T/ON
TOTAL PARCELS: 1
TOTAL UNITS: 1
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: MRc
SPECIAL OVERLAY: SCALED RESIDENTIAL
HEIGHT: 25-FT
MIN NET LOT AREA: 5,000 SF
PRESIDENT USE: RESIDENTfAL

PROPOSED USE- RESIDENTIAL
LOT INFORMATION TOTAL GROSS LOT AREA: 6,120 SF
TOTAL NET LOT AREA: 6,120SF
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA:6,120 SF
NOTE: UTILITIES ARE KNOIMI TO EXIST IN THE AREA. THE
CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAK£ DUE PRECAUTIONARY

MEASURES TO PROTECT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES OR
STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THE V.ORK SITE.

EXISTING UTILITIES AR.E SHOJMI PER AVAILABLE RECORD
INFORMATION. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, DEPTH,

LOCATION, AND MATERIAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION

SITE AREA TABULA T/ON

IMPERVIOUS

PERVIOUS
TOTAL
%IMPERVIOUS

EXISTING SITE
3,BODSF
2,320SF
6,120SF

62.0%

SITE SETBACKS

FRONT YARD

REAR YARD

SIDE YARD

EXISTING SITE
25FT
5FT
25FT
SCALE: t•= 10'

PROPOSED SITE
3,047SF

3.073SF
6,120SF

49.8%

PROPOSED SITE
25FT
5FT
25FT

NET CHANGE
•753SF
+753SF
OSF
·12.2%
NOTE: FENCING, HANDRAJLS, AND
RAILINGS PER LANDSCAPE Pl.ANS,
EARTHWORK QUANTITIES :

SITE GRADING (OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURE)
CUT. 40CY
FILL:40CY
NET: 0 CY IMPORT/EXPORT
EXCAVATION FOR BASEMENT: 750 CY (CUT)
EXCVATATIONFOR FOOTINGS & FOUNDATION: 50 CY (CUT)
TOTAL GRADING (CUT AND FILL OUTSIDE & BELOW STRUCTURE): 880 CY (+R&R)° CUT • EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY AND REPRESENT COMPACTED (IN PLACE) VOLUMES ONLY. THESE VALUES ARE CALCULATED ON A THEORETICAL BASIS. ACTUAL QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE TD OBSER\11:D SHRINKAGE AND/OR SWELL FACTORS
• 0111:REXCAVATION I REMOVE & RECOMPACT VOLUME TO BE DETERMINED

PER RECOMMENDATION OF GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
NOTE: A BACXFLO'NVAL VE WLL BE REQUIRED ON THE SE1-1£R

LATERAL SERVING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT WTH THE CITY OF SOLANA
BEACH FOR THE PUBLIC SEViE"R v.1TH/N PROPERTY LIMITS

TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO FINAL OCCUPANCY
NOTE: BMPS ARE TO BE PR/VA TEL Y

MAINTAINED AND THE FACIUTIES

NOT MODIFIED OR REMOVED
v.1THOUT A PERMIT FROM THE CITY.

EMRA NOTE: EXISTING AND
PROPOSED ENCROACHMENTS v.1THIN
THE SEVvE"R EASEMENT TO BE UNDER
EMRA FILED "1TH GRADING PERMIT.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 4 OF SOLANA BEACH VISTA. IN THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH. COUNTY OF SAND/EGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO PARCEL MAP THEREOF NO. 2143, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF S1W DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 17TH, 1928
A.P.N.: 263-042-17
~: 506 PACIFIC A\11:NUE
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
OWNERIPERMIITEE: JIM BOYD
506 PACIFIC A\11:NUE
SOW-IA BEACH, CA 92075
TOPOGRAPHIC SUR\11:Y : PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES
(858)-259-8212
WORK TO BE DONE THE IMPR0\11:MENTS CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING WORK TO BE DONE ACCORDING TO THESE PLANS AND THE LATEST EDITIONS OF:

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (1) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION INCLUDfNG THE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDMENTS.
(2) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "MAJJUAJ.. OF TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE WORK ZONES·
(3) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

STANDARD DRAWINGS
(1) SAN DtEGO REGIONAi. STANDARD DRAWINGS
(2) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLANS LEGEND

ITEM DESCRIPTION

PROPERTY LINE /PROJECT BOUNDARY

EXISTING CENTERLINE

ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LIN£

PROPOSED SETBACKS

PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE

EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING PERARCHl PLAN
PROPOSED LIGHTWELL PER ARCH'L Pl.AN

PROPOSED ROOF OVERHANG PERARCH'L PLAN

PROPOSED PAVERS PERL 'SCAPE PLAN

PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVBVAY PER L'SCAPE PLAN
PROPOSED GRA\11:L BAND PER L'SCAPE

PROPOSED POOL PERL 'SCAPE

PROPOSED WALL PERL 'SCAPE

PROPOSED RETAJNING WALL

PROPOSED BMP PWITER AREA
PROPOSED RfPRflP DISPERSION STRIP

EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAJN
PROPOSED 4. PVC STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED 6" PERF PVC UNDERDRAJN
PROPOSED 6" NDS AREA DRAJN
PROPOSED 12" BROOKS BOX

PROPOSED SBVERLATERAL

PROPOSED WATER SERVICE
EXISTING SEWER LATERAL TO REMA!N

EXISTING WATER SERVICEHJETER TO REMAIN

OWNER'S CERT/FICA TE
SYMBOL
-----151-----
~
--- so -- so ---
-- SD ___.,_ SD --
-------------l!i!I-- so --
- s --s --s -
-w--w--w-
/, _______ AS OWNER/DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN ACKNOWLEDGE THESE PLANS HA\11: BEEN PREPARED AT MY DIRECTION WITH IJY FULL CONSENT I

FULLY UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN AND AS ATTACHED BY REFERENCE ON THIS GRADING PWl
IT IS AGREED THAT FIELD CONDITfONS MAY REQUIRE CHANGES TO THESE PLANS

IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE OWNER (DEVELOPER) SHALL HAVE A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER

MAKE SUCH CHANGES, ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THESE PLANS WHICH THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES ARE NECESSARY Af-lD DESIRABLE FDR THE PROPER COMPLETION OF THE

IMPROVEMENTS
I FURTHER AGREE TO COMMENCE WORK ON ANY IMPR0\11:MENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WITHIN EXISTING CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND TO PURSUE SUCH

WORK ACTIVELY ON EVERY NORMAL WORKING DAY UNTIL COMPLETED, IRRESPECTIVE AND INDEPENDENT OF AJIY OTHER WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT OR UNDER MY CONTROL.

JIM BOYD
506PACIF/CA\11:NUE
SOLANA BEACH, CA92075
DATE

DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE

I, TYLER GLAWSON, HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT, THAT I /-M\11: EXCERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE 0\/ER THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE, AND THE DESIGN JS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS AND THE CITYOF SOLANA BEACH RESOLUTION No. 2007-170

I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK OF PROJECT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY OF SOLANA

BEACH IS CONFINED TO A REVIEW ONLY AND DOES NOT RELIEVE ME OF RESPONSIBILITIES FDR PROJECT DESIGN.

BY: ________ _

TYLER LAWSON
RCE Ne. 80355 EXP 12!3112D20
PASCO L.AR.ET Stn"/ER & ASSOCIATES

PREPARED BY,

PASCO LARET SUITER
I ASSOCIA1J"IES San Dlea:o I Solana Beach I Orana:e County Phone 858.259.8212 I www.plsaenglneerlna:.com

SECTION KEY MAP
SCALE: 1"=20'
I I 0 20 40 60 i----- SCALE: 1"=20'

PACIFIC AVE

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
506 PACIFIC AVENUE
I
I I
1 5.0' I .sYs8.:

PROPOSED
GRADE
FF= 73.75
I
I I
I 5.0' ,
I
I 1n
-~=--::::-:c::--::::-:::--c"-:::-':"--========================-::::::-"" T

EXISTING GRADE
8FF=63.52

SECT/ONA-A

NOTTO SCALE
I
I•

STRUCTURAL
I
I
I
I
I
INFLUENCE ZONE "-..::....

25.0' RYS8 ! . 25.0' FYS8 • :I _ !_ I FF=~~ -
~;:GRAD: --~~==~--=-::.::.:.;:.:.:-::.:~~~b=~========================~-~t------EX-IS_T_IN_G_G_R-AD_E _ _/_--i 8FF=63.52
SECTION 8-8

NOTTO SCALE
EMRA NOTE: EXJSTING AND
PRorosfi:iaiciiOACHMENTS 'MTHIN
THE $Ev.ER EASEMENT TO BE UNDER
EMRA FILED li'd1H GRADING PERMfT.

I
EX6"SEWER
IE-58.0
.1
NOTE: FENCING, HANDRAILS, AND
RAILINGS PER LANDSCAPE Pi.ANS
250'±
150'±
ROADV.'AY
EXfSTING PCC

CURB & GUTTER
J

10.0't
PAR~Y

4.5'+ 5.5':t I
v.MLK L'SOPE
TYPICAL SECTION: PACIFIC AVENUE
025'

TOPOFBASINITWPER PLAN
a·cMUV\lA.LL
3"MULCH
18" B!OFILTRATION MEDIA

OVERFLOW STRUCTURE
1:rx12• BROOKS BOX
PER Pt.AN
3" 0 PVC OUTLET SD

DAYLIGHT TO GRADE
__ __., _ _.,,"-._ TREATED RUNOFF

DISCHARGE TO RIP RAP
'-. fl ~ERF PVC UNDERDRA!N 6" CONCRETE BASE SLAB

IMPERMEABLE LINER
17 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE

STORAGE W GRAVEL

FILTER COURSE
~------~ "-.NATNEFILL

NOTE BMPS ARE TO BE PRNATEL Y
MAJNTAJN£0 ANO TH£ FACILITIES
NOT MOOF/£0 OR REMOVED
VdTHOUT A PERMIT FROM THE CITY.

TYPICAL BMP DETAIL NOTTO SCALE
V RAfllNG PERL 'SCAPE!ARCH'L
I LWL PERL 'SCAPEIARC/fL

BMP INLET DETAIL

NOTTO SCALE

PREPARED BY,

PASCO LARET SUITER
§, ASSOCIATIES San Oles:o I Solana Beach I Orange County Phone 858.259.8212 I www.p!saeng!neerlng.com
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
----

DEMOLITION NOTES
I. ALL 11EMS NO1ED AS 'REMOVED' &l-lALL 6E REMOVED FROM T14E SITT: AND LAURILL Y DISPOSED OF.

2. DISCONNECTION AND/OR REMOVAL OF UTILITIES AND PHONE AND CA6LE 1ELEVISION LINES &l-lALL 6E COORDINATED AS REQUIRED WIT!-l THE APPROPRIATE COMPANIES OR AGENCIES.

3. eEFORE SCRAPIN<:; OR REMOVIN<:; CEILIN<:; LID IL!-IERE SPRAYED ACOUSTICAL CEILIN<:; 1EXTURE OCCURS, CONTRACTOR &l-lALL >-!AYE MINIMUM N\JMElEF< OF SPRAYED ACOUSTICAL TEXTURE SAMPLES TES1ED 61' AN APPROVED LA6. IF SAMPLES 1EST POSITIVE FOR ASElESTOS, CONTRACTOR &l-lALL CON.TRACT WITH A CCMPANY THAT IS LICENSED 6Y Tt-lE STATE Cf' CALIFORNIA FOR A$6E5TOS REMOVAL TO REMOVE SPRA-rED ACOUSTICAL TEXTURE MATERIAL 6EFORE DEMOLl&l-llNc; ANY AFFEC1ED CEILIN<:;S.

4. SELECTED EXISTlr-.::i TREES AND ~RUBS Sl-4ALL REMAIN A.ND $,!ALL 6E PROTECTED DUR[~ Tl4E COURSE OF DEMOLITION AND CONST"'-ICTION. IF ANY TREES OR &l-l"'-16S MUST 6E 1EMPORAF<IL y REMOVED DUE TO CONST"'-ICTION, T>-IE'r" S>-IALL 6E CAREFULLY STORED, MAINTAINED AND REPLANTED IN Tl-elR ORIGINAL LOCATION.

S. CONTRACTOR TO C0MPL Y W!Tl-4 AND FILL OUT Ti-E WASTE MANA.GEMENT FOFi:M FOR CCNSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DE6F<IS DEPOSIT PF<OGF<AM. 50'. OF ALL DE6F<IS GENERATED FROM T>-IE PROJECT MUST 6E RECYCLED AND DOCIJ"1ENTED. ~
::EE:3:C
I I
".J
WALLS TO 6E DEMOLIS>-IED
WINDOW TO 6E REMOVED
DOOR TO 6E REMOVED
@DEMOLITION PLAN
A
----
I
I
I
I
I
I
1/4' • 1'·0'
w If)
r l) IS)
z ,N
W<P
w >-s:t
Q -<t l)
l) '
tj) -:r
!!:: l) w 0-s:t ~ -<till
{L {Q
Q ~-<t
',- &z
0 If) -<t
_J
ill 0
o)
I. DESIGN l<EVIEUI sueHITTAL
II/IS/212)212)

2. DE~ l<EYIEil 1<!:51.fflTT;j_
12)2/11,/212)21

3. ~l<EYIElll<ESlfflTTAL
12)4/12)1,/212)21

4. ~ l<EYIEil l<!:51.fflTT;j_
11/312)/212)21
!:>. DES!Gtl l<EYIEIJ l<ESlfflTTAL
12)4/11,/212)22
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
""""""' CHECKED B'f
ELEl MCM
""" JOB l«l.
04/IB/22 IU>!:>

DEMO FLAN
A-1.l
~
+-

EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN
NEW STUD WALi..&
NEUI $-!EAR UJAL.L&, SEE 5TRLICT FOR DETAIL&

WINDOW TO REMAIN
NEW WINDOW, SEE 5CHEDULE

EXISTING DOOR TO BE REUSED
NEW DOOR, see SC!-IEDULE

FULL HEIGHT CABINET
DRAU.ERS
\
\
\
I
I
\
----
----r
\ -
\
\
~ ~\
---
----
r
I
I
\ I
\ I
~\
\~
"'
18'-1:Z)'

CRAUL SPACE
i3'-8 !12'
---
tlllQU
ADC.
---- A-6.
--- --- ---
UX>OD
~
4B:U;BQCt:l
=
A-6.
----
--/
---
=
~
--- --- J
I
I
I k
LINE Or FLOOR
ABOVE/
I
I
I
I
-17
I
@BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
-2
----
I
I
I
I
I
I
w If)
r (j ~ ,N
z ill (fl
w >-<{
Q -<tu
l) '
<J) -I
!:!:::u w 0-<t fr'_ -<tw
IL ill
Q ~-<{
>- ~z
If) -<{ () -1
(0 ()
tj)

1. DESIGN REYIElll 5UeMITTAL
1111~nei2e>

2. DE513H£vlEIIRESUE1111TAL
e>2il8ne>2I

3. DE5k"il REV1E11 RESUel"ITT AL
e>4te>ene>2I

4. DE5k"il REVIEII RESUel"ITTAL
ll/3e>ne>21
s. DE5k"il REV1E11 RESUel"ITTAL
e>4il8ne>22
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
_,,,,.,, CHECKED!'ff
EL6 MCM
""" -"" NO.
e>4il8n2 Ii¾?:;,
FLOOR FLAN$
A-2_0
~
--
-iiiliiiiliiim
+-
EXISTING WAI. LS TO REMAIN
NEW STUD WAI.LS

NEW SHEAR WALLS , SEE STRUCT

WINDOW TO FOR DETAILS
REMAIN
NEW WINDOW , SEE SOlEDULE
EXISTING DO OR TO ElE REUSED

NEW DOOR SEE SCI-IEDULE
FULL HEIGi-IT CABINET
- -
\
\
---- -- --r
\
\_
-
\

NEW F'AVERS
LANDSCAPE ~:N
\
- -----
~
: \ ~
: \
=i±
I
- -----
----
-------
----- v
~1
~ I
I ~
~ I
I I
I

STONE/VENEER
I
s
~
---- -- - -
,--
1 7
71171
ilLL I

LANDSC PIT PER APE PLAN
\

NEW FIRE
114' • 1'·0'
I
I
I
I
I
I
A-2.1
~

EXISTING WALL& TO REMAIN
- NEW STUD WALL&
~ NEW ~AR WALLS, &EE STRUCT FOR DETAILS
W!NDOUI TO REMAIN
~ NEW WJNDOW, SEE &CHEDULE
0 EXISTING DOOR TO 6E REUSED
NEW DOOR. &EE &C~DULE
RJLL J-.IEIGl-lT CA61NET
DRAIJ.ERS
----
\
\
\
--r
\ -
\
\
I \
-6
~I LINEC1"ROC<'
AeOVE
1'-1'
42'J.II~
GLASS

RAILING
_,. WOOD ~
t1.m2Btl.

WOOD
tl...Q..

WOOD
fa
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I"
I
- r
LINE OF ROOF AeOVE
I
I
I ~ I

LINE, OF ROOF
AeOVE
-
@SECOND FLOOR F'LAN
w 11)
r
----
I
l) ~ ,N
z WOl
w >-<[
Q -<[ l)
l) '
{j) -I
!:!:: l) w U-<[ {l -<Cw

0... (Q
Q -.!:) -<[
'>- ~z
() 11)-<[
-1
I
ill 0
tj)
I. DE&IGH f<!:VIEUJ 6UEl1ITTAI.
11/19/2020

2. DESl'.il J<EYIEiJ li£"'61JTT;!L
02/18/2021

3. DES!Gtl!<EYIEilli£SUE1111T;!L
04/08/2021
I

4. DESl'.il!<EY811i£"'61JTT;!j_
11/30/2021
S. DESl'.il!<EYIEilli£SUE111TT;!L
04/18/2022

I OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.

I
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
I
lHt~SKIU~
~~~ ~'/ll'llil)Oll'!W,f;
"'~-
0P.A'lrn8Y CH.£Cf(£08Y

ELB MCM
o,n: """""· 04/18122 lee>!:,

FLOOR FLAN&
fl) A-2.2
NORTf-1
(])
@SECOND FLOOR AREA FLAN
NORTH
l/81 • P-e•
@FIRST FLOOR AREA FLAN

FLOOR AREA CALCULATION
FROPO&ED 1ST FLOOR LIVINa# AREA,
PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR LIVING AREA,
FROFOSED 6ASEHENT AREA,
PRQF:0;£Q GARAGE ARE;A,
TOTAL 6UILDING AREA,
=·STREET FA!<KING EXEMFTlc,,i,
BASEMENT AREA ExEMEI\C'N: TOTAL 6UILDING TOWARDS FAR,
MAX ALLOWA6LE FAR SF,
TOTAL LIVING ADDITION AREA:

TOT AL TERRACE 4 6ALCONY AREA,
TOT AL ~ DECK AREA,
FLOOR AR!;A RATIO CALCULATION, LOT AREA X 0.!x!W (FOR FIRST 6~ SF) 4,110 Sf'
82& SF
2~S SF
1;,ee SF 1,$0851'
1)14 Sf'
448Sf
4,618 Sf'
-400 Sf'
-1214 Sf 2.~Sf'
3-"'21 Sf'
LOT AREA X 0.11S !FOR FORTlc,,i OF LOT"-""'' • IS-"""' Sf'! LOT AREA X 0.10el <FOR PORTION OF LOT 15>;Z>01 - 20/Zl00 SFJ LOT AB,EA X 0,00 <FOR FQRT!Ct,J Of LOT @REATI;fs T~AN 20000 SFJ TOT AL ALLOWA6LE FAR,
(])
NORTH
1/8' • 1'-0'
•3/2>00Sf
21 Sf' 051'
'2 SF 3,021 SF
~
LIV!NC:f AREA • 2,8% SF
6ASEMENT AREA • 1)14 Sf'
GAR.AGE AREA • 448 5F
r--~-7
r-----.J ---
r--J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
L
@BASEMENT FLOOR AREA FLAN
(])
NORTH
1/8' • l'-0'
w u)
r l) ~ ,N
z w (ll
w >-s:t
0 -<t 0
0 - ti) -I
w !:!::o
0-s:t {l -<tw

0.. ill
0 ,£) -<t
',- ~z
C) u) -<t
_j
ill ()
Q)
I. DESIGN l<EVIEUI sueMITT.11.
ll/l,1/2020

2. DE~i<£Yal~I'<.
02/18/2021

3. ~ f<EY8I F:!:aa-lTTI'<.
04/08/2021

4. ~ i<£Yal F£!00i1TT/,j_
11/30/2021

5. DE~ f<EYEII F:!:aa-lTTI'<.
04/18/2022
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
'""""" CH£C:i([D fN
EL6 MCM
CATE JOll ""·
04/18122 IWS

AREA DIAGRAM& I
A-2.3
\
\
\
- - ---- - - -----r \
3-FJ..Y T W/L!GHT ~H SYSTEM
CSRAN'JLA ORED CLASS 'A~ CAP SHEE
A55EMSL ROOFING ~YFERDETAI
-
\
PL +2tZl'-2"/4:'
----- -
---- - ----- - V -- --===
---- ----1
- - _J
B9Qf PECK
---- -- - - - ----- - ----- TILE DECK FER FLAN BELOW
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A-3_1
EXTERIOR MATERIAL FIN I 5 !-l

TYPE DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MATERIAL
ST-I EXTERIOR STUCCO UJ,.O,LL5 EXPO STUCCO
eN-1 5TONE WALLS AMERICAN SLATE STONE TILE
F'T-1 FASCIA PAINT 5+-Efi1.LIIN WILLIAMS ' WI-I W1NPOW5 ANPE"""' W1NPOW5 DR-I ENTRYDOOR ' NA"JURAL MAHoG.AN-r
~, Ii
~ 0
PLATE LINE$ "'._I •
5C!-lEDULE
FINIS!-1

5.ANTA!3AReARA
NATURAL aJARTZ!TE
SATIN/E'"'~L
"E' SERIES
TUI"
PROPO&eDlcEMENT / /
SOARD &ID/>lG / I / f'ROF'O&ED

CUTLINE OF EXISTING
&TRUCTURE
/ :!~:h
OUTLINE ct' •
~~
3-COAT P.C. STUCCO -t---t---
f'ROF'O&ED

STONE VENEER
j
w w
--...__,_------ r==-----1---,:i-_;_=-..;;:=:....,.,.---~-1--1-~ " 1_2&"-0' MAX. J.lEIGHT
6UILD11'1G ENYlcLOF'E
7~ ~I
3-COAT P.C. STUCCO
ROOF DECK F<AILl>lG

W/ GLAS&
" " "
---- --- -
ll Ii
I
i ~ Iii 0
I"' ii:
fj
I GI.A&&
F<AILl>lG
PROPOSED : GRADE
: EXl&T. GRADE
@WEST ELEVATION .

L
2S'-e:>' MAX !-+EIG!-4T
6UILD11'1G ENYlcLOF'E
- - -7~ ',I_
I~
llli

ISTFLOOR
{!)'-0' A.SF.
~
~
• 1:L. :_ 1~1&'~

BASEMENT
-le>'-2>4'A.SF.
<EL• 6352'J
_/--,, ~ ,.,-,-,,·=r.

J ~OUTLINE ct'

BASEMENT
WAL.L&
@NOF;T!-1 ELEVATION .
1ST FLOOR

BA&EMENT
-!0'-2>4• A.5.F
<EL " 63.S2'J.
w
u
z
w
Q
u)
w
{Y
Q
',---
()
ill
I. DESIGNl<!:YIEl!laeMITTAI.
llil,l/2JZ)2JZ)

2.DE~F£YIEIIRESlfflTTAL
e>2/l8/2e>21

3. ~ F£YIEII RESlfflTTAL
JZ)4/JZ)8/2JZ)21

4. ~ F£YIEII RES!fflTTAL
11/3.i> /2 JZ)2 I
S. DE5r,N F£YIEII RESlfflTTAL
JZ)4/18/2JZ)22
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2
SAN DIEGO .CA
92109
"'""' Irr
CHECKED 8Y
EL6 MCM
""' Jee HO.
e>4il8122 JOOS

ELEVATIONS
A-4.l
2ND FLOOR
15T FLOOR
ei'-.z>'ASF.
(EL = 13.7:0'J
6ASEMENT
-10•-2>~• A.SF.
(EL • e:.3521'J
OUTLINE Cl'

BASEMENT

WALLS---

OBSCURED
GLASS W!NDOUJ5 Tl ----i--.____
3-COAT P.C. srucco---i ___ J
oe&cURED
c;LASS RAILING
FLU&!-4 l!JALL
1-lUNG PLANTER

OUTLINE OF
EXl5Th~
STRUCTURE -------i-+--t+-t+--,r---~
EXl&T. GRADE
OUTLINE Cl'
BA.."-EMENT

WALLS------
~
'" IJ!l

PROPOSED CEMENT
~ARD SIDING
"' "' I
•====-=l;!,=lltl I
:: I
I
fil
- - -~ -'0--- -~ - 3-COAT P.C. EXIST. PATIO EXIST. GRADE

STUCCO GRADE PROPOSED
l l
L_ 25'-;Z>' MAX 1-!E!G:HT

BUILDING ENVELOPE
- r=-==--=F--'='i-~'-"'f-................. -1----1-....... ----....,. ff_,!

PROPOSED CEMENT
SOARD 5!D1"'-IG
L

STONE VENEER

WALL MOUNTED AIC
CONDEN51NG- u-llT
'-.__ OUTLINE Cl'
BA5Et1ENT
l!JALLS
@EAST ELEVATION
L .____ OUTLINE OF
6A5EMENT
WALLS
@SOUT!-1 ELEVATION
':
§l
.,,.
$ 15TFLOOR
"'-"'A.SF.
~
~
' /EL ~-1~15'~
-1;.Z)'-2>4• A.SF.
(EL• 63.52')
1/4" • l'-0'

PLATE LINE

PROPOSED

STONE VENEER

BASEMENT
-!"'-23-<i,' A5F. (EL• 6352'>
w 11)
r l) ~ ,N
z w (fl
w >-<[
Q -<to
0 - (j) -I
!!: 0 w 0-<[
ft -<t:w
IL[Q
Q ~-<[
'r ~z
() 11) -<[
-l
ill 0
($)
I. DESIGN l<EYIEUI &IBHITT tJ.
11!1<;12020

2. D!:Sislistl'B/l<E5iffl11tl.
02/1612021

3. D!:Sisl l<EYl:II l<Eaa111Ttl.
04106/2021

4. DESlel istl'B/ 1<1:5!fflTiill
1113012021
s. D!:Sisl l<EYl:ll l<Eaa111Till
0411612022
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2
SAN DIEGO .CA
92109

OAAWN BY CHECKED BY

ELEI MCM
"'"' '°'"" 04/16122 JI¾):,
ELE'VATION5
A-4.2
GRS:AT fii:M. PLATE
l&T FLOOR
0'-0' A.£,F.
/EL • 1:>.1&'J
LIG.!TU.ELL
-8'-4 A.S.F.
<EL • 6S.4!1'>
GRS:AT RM. PLATE
20'- 1q.'A.SF.
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
et'-0' A.SF.
<EL • 13.1&'J
r
I
I
I
9 Q
:1.
"'
Q
I 2 _., __LMAX . .!EIG.!T _., BU!LDIN5 ~OPE __
~I -- -- -------:::7 -- - - --"-- -- -- --
:1
12 / ~
-~ I I I I I I I I I I I J ~ 12
r ~2 -· ""'-- I I I I L
~ --- / ;Ji ,- ' I ~
Le_ j ~
-~----' 9 9 0
"
Q ~ ~ t1..l2A
I
9 ~ "' :;, "'
"' ~ ~I ~ ~
9 ~
I J.J. 6A. ~ 9 t!fl2lA " J8, SUIT!; 6[2RM.

I I
I - ~
<E>GRADE '-- ,_
vt,,,-
EGRE&&LADDER~
.__.,
"' '--
~ 9 '-- "'
l~ rr
'--
-
~1 7 ~I ,n
&I :1 fl ;Ji
}
~
"'
9 ~
~
<EJGRADE
~
GA.Ml; fstl.
- / MAX. HEIGHT -6
_j_ ~NC, ENVELOFE __
ROOF [2!;CK
LAUN. MR.

G.6A.
~
~ ~
9 "
I BUILDING 5ECTION
-b.
~
GAHi; fstl. ()
"
@BUILDING 5ECTION
l
1i
ii!
1~
I
Ir
1-,
I
I I
I 9
I
~
I
I
ill
z
::;
7~
I~
1n.
a~ -
I
I
I
I
9 "
I
~ i ~ ,- l../"
2 I
I :1.

I
"'
Q
I
I
l--'~
-~
:1.
"'
N
:v
1/4'. ,._.,.
1/4' • l'-0'
2ND FLOOR
l&T FLOOR
0'-0' ASF.
<EL ■ 13.lS'J
BASE. PLAlE
-1'-2'4' A.SF.
-1ei•-2>4• A.SF.
<EL• 63.52\'J
PLAlE LINE
1ST FLOOR
0'-0' A.SF.
<EL • 13.1S'J
-1ei•-2>4• A.SF.
<EL • 63.S21'J
w I.{)
r
l) ~
z ,N
W<P
w >-q
Q -<t l)
l) '
u) -I
!!: l) w 0-q fr'_ -<tw
IL iO
Q ~-<t
>-- ~z
C) I.{) -<t
_j
ill 0
d)
I. DESIGN REYIEUI 5UEl11TTAL
II/IS/2'1!2'1>

2. DE5l:;tl FiEY8I F£&a11TTAI.
'1>2/18/2'1>21

3. DEsr.l FiEY8I .£!1.fflTTAI.
'1>4/08/2'1>21

4. DE5l:;tl FiEY8I F£!1fflTTAI.
11/3'1>/2'1>21

5. DESl:;tlFiEYBl~AI.
'1>4/18/2'1>22
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
""'"'" CttEt!<roBY
EL6 MCM
"'" .,. "°· '1>4/18/22 1005
ElUILDING SECTIONS I
A-0.1
I
I
wl
It ~1
i:

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j___
I
~1 --
e)
:1
'" '
I /
(
I
~ I
I
r
I 9
.,
I
-
u
<{
~
e)
UI
ii
I
r
I
I
-- -- --- -- --
2 I _L MAX 1-!EluHT A-6. A-6,
BUILDING: ENVELoPE _
--- -- -~ -- -- --
- --- --
--
-
--- ---
- / 12
2r- -- ---
- ----
---- 12 -~ ~2 l~r/ ~
- /
----'
I[ _n
--- -~ -, Tf;fsfs6CI; 9 9 GREAT Rt-t DINING
'" '" ., I I;
~
"' ()J I ~
2 -CAR GAR,¾,!; 9
'" §l2RtL!l ~
~
':
'1 121;12 "I 9 '1 121;12. "2
'"

LJ L - -
ROOF 121;CK
/
/
9 ,.. 3'-4 PAN. KITCl-li;N
' ' ' ' '
s fil6lR.
<:
3'-6 12•
t1!;J2j_6,
1 /
"
GAMI; RM.
77 I
e)
:1
'"
I
I
I
1 TT
__,/ ~ T •--•·• -••
t+--
I
$ ELATE LINE 9'-L?l' A.SF.

I
I
J
$ BASEMENT
I
-h
@!3UILDING SECTION
_____,,/ ~ '-I" "" - , .... "'-'>1",
$ PLATE LINE
19'-2"4' A.SF.
$ PLATE LINE S'-0' A.SF.
(EU GRADE
$ 6A&Et1ENT
@6UILDING SECTION
I
I
J
1/,4'. I'·<>'
I
J
w Ii)
r l) (:;}
,N
z WOl
w ><[
Q <t:u
u
- d) -I
w !!: u U<[
Ck'.'. -<Cw
{}_ [Q
Q ~-<[
}- (:;}z
() Ii) -<[
_J
co ()
tj)
I. DESIGN l¢YIEW SIJl:MITTAI.
11/19/2020

2. DES!::IO<l:YIE'JI l<ESlfflTTAL
02/IB/2021

3. DESl::ll l<EYBI l<ESlfflTTAL
04/01>/2021

4. DESl::lll<EYIE'Jll<ESlfflTTAL
11/30/2021
S. DESl::ll l<EYIE'JI l<Eal!lHITTAL
04/IB/2022
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
tm:~miti\U!W'Y
Al,L~#Q~
~Af'IHEtffEa::nlP£
l'IIOCl:CN.MTMl:Aeli-.U:
.. ~-
OAAWllS'l' CHECKED 8Y
EL6 MCM
"'" ~'08 NO.
04/IB/22 lee>!:>
6UILDING SECTIONS I
5 T 0 R y f' 0 L E 5 C 1-l
POLE• PONT ELEv. TC!" POLE ELEV. POLE LEN:;TM

13.'!(!l' .,,., ..... ..... . ...OLD DESIGN ...,., lD.21'

13.18' ...... ,ow ....,., U,J&'
• 13.'41' .. ... 651'
...,., 13.9'4'
..... "'"''
• ,.,_.., ...,., 2!.03'
• ,.,.,.,, ..... . .... 8"'' ..,,, .,.., IO,TI'
OLD DES.IGN '""°'' ,..,., ...,., 2ltl3'
OLD DESIGN ,.,., ,...,.,
'3.16' l<>K
OLD DESIGN .,,., ,..., .,.., IO.'JS'
"' OLD DESIGN '3:U,' ,,, ... .,,., ...... 153.«.' I0.'!6' OLD DESIGN ,.,., ,...,.,
'!l&.14' """ OLD DESIGN ....... ,.,.,
I> C!11T
.. OLD DESIGN "°'' ,.,., ,. OLD DESIGN .,.,, ,,.., ,. C!11T n OLD DESIGN .. ,.. lf/!3'
,. C!11T
,. OLD DESKiiN ,....,, ll1l'
,,, OLD DESIGN ,....,, ,..,., ...... .. ....
" OLD DESIGN '3.'16'' ,.,,, ., .... WU'
...... .,.,, l2 OLD DESIGN ., ... ,. •-' .,,., ..... ...... .,,.., ,. OLD DESIGN '3;'16' U,tl' ,. OLD D£51GN ...,,, , ....... .,..,,, ,..,, .,,., .... .,.., ,.,.,. ,. C!11T ,. OLD DESJGH .,,., .... ...... ., ... ,, OLD DESIGN ,...,,, ,.,,, ....,., 1c~· ,. ua1· .. ..,.. 201!1'
,. &>.TI .,,., .,., ..... )021'
-"' .. ,..,. .,,., 13,41'
..... 31 .. ...., .,,., ..,., - ,.,,, .,,. ., 13£.1!>' .,,., "-"" .,.., ""°' 3> 83.65' .,.,, .... .,,., ,_,,,. .,. .. ..,.,. ., .... .... .,,., ,,., ,. 83."'3' >Ml' .. ,. .,,., >Al' .. 64.10' .,,., 13.15'
'1IT 12,41'
...... W,.2&'
37 &S,6~' .,,., t2J6'
'1fl' .... •• 13.61' '1n' lll!;'
.,_..,, .... .,,., 13.13'
.. C!11T
.,, 13.&2' .,,., ._.,,
&.lt6' "'"'' ., 13.82' '1n'
...,., '"''

20.24'
., 8321' ...,., 1131'
.. 83£)0' .. ... ,,.., .. .. ,.., .. .... ...,.,
... 83.6~' .,.,, .... ,,.,, '·"'
E D u L E

NOTE& -
"'"'" -'"""' -
"""'-"
"""" ..... "' l.FffR. •EA.YE
"""'-"
"'"'" -..,,.,.
"'"'" _ _,
"'"'"
lf'FER. •EA.YE
"""" lf'FER
- •EA'vf:
"""'-"
"""" .,,,.,,. _ _,
""""
""'
""'
"""'
TE!>""-"
__ ..... "' _,
"""" l.FffR
- •EA'-£
"""'-"
"""" lf'FER
- •EAYE
t1iODLE
"""" . .,. ... I.Pf'ER: - •EAYE
lff£R'100!.E
HIOOI.E
""""
lf'FER • 1112.1'0R.E'LT
"""" lffER
""""
--
"""""""'
lffERRAIL
'°"""""'
lffERRAll.
"""""""'
.....

OEO:
lffER"""'
.....
lffER"""'
RAIL
il'l'ER"""'
""-
--
"""""' """""""'
--
""""""' "'""'"""' """""""'
RAil
1'All
oeo:

IPFER"""'
"""""""'
"""'
"""'
"""' """'""""
.....
8'-5 112'
---i_ _ _J
1---t+--LINE a= EXISTING:
~
2:12 6UILDlNG: TO BE
DEMO'D
I

BQOEPECK
~~~di;~~· '31::f:::f:

T .ORAIL 97.$'
T.O.ROOF SS.98'
--:-_J I
I
I
I~~
I a&..
sL
--------- L_ -----
LINE OF EX!&T!Nc:r
6UILD1Na. TO 6E
DEMO'D
~
2,12
Ll T.O.RAIL 97.SS' • 31 ::f: :t: T.0.R:OCf! '36.19'
~
2:12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T.O.lUALL &e.'ee'
T .O.RAIL 87.3S'
DECK 83..8S'
2'-C,'
_ _J
@&TORY FOLE FLAN
'6 * * ::f:
fl)
NORT!-1
w If)
r
u ~
z ,N
llJ (fl
w >-<[
Q -<[ (j
(j '
u) -:r
!!: (j w U-<[ {t -<t:w
{L (Q
Q ~-<[
',- ~z
() If) -<[
.....1
ill 0
(j)
I. DESIGN l<EY1EIJJ aeMITTAI.
11/19/2020

2. ~ l<fVBI REallMITTAL
02/18/2021

3. ~ l<fVBI l<E&ilHIITAL
04/08/2021

4. ~ l<fVBI REallMITTAL
ll/30/2021
S. Dl:Slsl l<fVBI ;£eW11TJAL
04/18/2022
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC .
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
THE~SWU~
~~.rtfO[)CmNl
~.o;fnt(SlttJU'OM:
l'IIOCElDIH(,WITH[.l(;H,twtf
.,..,_
""""'" CHECKED BY
EL6 MCM
°'" JOB "°· 04/18/22 ll¾?S

I &TORY POLE PLAN I
SP-1
----
c;
I
I
I
I
T.O.!l.lALL

88.-e8'
T.O.R.A!L
8735''
DECK

83..BS'
POINT ELEV.
73£)8'
T.ORA!L
S7.SS'
T.O.WALL
Sl.17'
fJ]
T.O.RAIL
S7.~'
TO.ROOF
'34.58'
@WEST STORY POLE ELEVATION
TD.ROOF
OvERHANC:t
~£.)6'
T.O.RAIL
873:>'
DECK
83$5'
-------
POINT ELEV.

73.~'
----
@NORTl-l STORY POLE ELEVATION
s 114•. r-o•
w u)
r
l) 0
,N
z ill (fl
w >-q
Q -<t 0
0 '
<J) -:r
!:!::o w 0-q Q(_ -<tw
(LIQ
Q ,£) -<t
',- 0z
() u) -<t
-l
(Q C)
d)
I. DESIGN REYIE\11 i:I.IEMITTilJ.

I\IIS/2020

2. DE5l:':ll fi£Vli:ll RE&fflTT;J.
021I6/202I

3. DE5l:':ll fi£Vli:ll RE&fflTT;J.
04106/202I

4. DESl:':llfi£Vli:llRE5U1:1111T,IJ.
11130/2021
S. DESl":il fi£Vli:ll RE&fflTT;J.
04116/2022
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
"'"''" CtfrCKto 8V
EL13 MCM
o,.n: ,00 ""·
04116/22 180::,
I STORY FOLE ELEV. I
SP-2
-------
T.0.ROCI'

OVERJ-IANG
'33.42'
T.OJIJALL
e 88.98'
T.O.RAIL

81.3&'
DECK

83.8S'
POINT ELEY.

73.0&'
@EAST STORY POLE ELEVATION
L_
@SOUT!-1 STORY POLE ELEVATION
w u)
r
u G
,N
z w (fl
w >-<[
Q -<[ l)
l) '
u) -I
w !:!:: l)
0-<[
fr -<[ w
IL ill
Q ~-<[
}- Gz
0 u) -<[
_j
co 0
!J)
I. DESIGN li£Y1EUI &JeMITT Al
llilS/2020

2. DE5l(,il l<EY8I ~A!.
02/18/2021

3. DESl(,Jll<EY8l~TTA!.
04/08/2021

4. DE5l(,il i<EY81 Fl:SUE11111A!.
11/30/2021
S. DESi:'il 1<EY81 Fl:SUE11111A!.
04/18/2022
OASIS

ARCHITECTURE
&
DESIGN, INC.
858-273-5632
1015 TURQUOISE ST.

SUITE2

SAN DIEGO ,CA
92109
lHIE~$1W.1."1l':WY
AU.~Nl0£l<lSm;
a:it101'1'l01f$ATMSffl:IIU0!!£
~'MTHl:,IO!Ptt.0.$£
"~-
EL!3 MCM
04/18/22 1805
j sroRY POLE ELEv. [
SP-3
VICINITY MAP:

LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR:

PRIVATE RESIDENCE
506 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, CA 92075
N
, s
BUILDING CODE INFORMATION:

APPLICABLE CODES:
2019 Calrrornia Administrative Code
2019 Calrrornia Building Code (CBC), induding amendments by the jursidiction having authority
2019 California Mechanical Code
2019 Calrrornia Plumbing Code
2019 Calrrornia Electrical Code
2019 Calrrornia Energy Code
2019 Calrrornia Fire Code
2019 California Green Building Standards Code
201 O ADA Standards for Accessible Design
2018 International Pool and Spa Safety Code
All Work shall conform to State and Federal rules and regulations.

Notify the Landscape Architect of any discrepancies in the Documents and do not proceed with that portion of the Work until the discrepancies are resolved.

DI~ T
811
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT DIRECTORY:

New driveway, walkways, fencing, gates, pool and
spa, as well as inigation and planting associated with
one renovated residential building.

SITE DATA:

BUILDING ADDRESS
506 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, CA 92075
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER:
263-042-1700

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 4, BLOCK 3, MAP 2143 in the City of Solana
Beach, County of San Diego, State of California
ARCHITECT:

Oasis Architecture & Design
1015 Turquoise Street, Suite 2
San Diego, CA 92109
Tel: (858) 273-5632
Contact: Mark Morris
[email protected]
CIVIL ENGINEER:

PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES
535 N Hwy 101
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Tel: (858) 259-8212
Contact: Tyler Lawson
www. plsaengineering. com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

TOPIA
2030 Galveston Street
San Diego, CA 92110
Tel: (858) 458-0555
Contact: Frank Marczynski
[email protected]
NOTES:

1. The contractor shall obtain all necessary permits and pay all related fees.

2. The contractor shall be appropriately licensed in the State of California.

3. The contractor shall notify the Owner prior to beginning the work and shall be responsible for coordinating with the Owner, Landscape Architect, Local Agencies, and other trades.

4. The Contractor shall notify the Landscape Architect immediately of any errors, omissions or discrepancies in the existing conditions or with the plans prior to starting the work.

5. Determination of "or equal" substitutions shall be the responsibility of the Landscape Architect.

6. The Landscape Architect shall be notified no less than 24 hours prior to any required site observations and/or meetings.

7. Site observations by the Landscape Architect during the installation of this project does not relieve the Contractor of his responsibility to peliorm all work in accordance with the plans, specifications and governing codes.

8. This firm does not practice or consult in the Field of Safety Engineering. This firm does not direct the construction operation and is not responsible for the safety of any persons other than our own on the site. The safety of others is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor shall notify the Owner and the Landscape Architect if any of the recommendations presented herein are considered to be unsafe.

SHEET INDEX:

SHEET: DESCRIPTION:

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
L-0 COVER
L-1 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTES & LEGEND
L-2 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
L-3 WATER CONSERVATION PLAN & CALCULATIONS
L-4 EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
L-5 STREET ELEVATION AND GATE DETAILS
2030 Galveston Street
San Diego, CA 921 1 O
T: (858) 458-0555
www.topialand.com
Boyd
Residence
506 Pacific
Avenue
Solana Beach,
CA
PROJECT NO. 20.007.00

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED
Issue Date
THEUSE~TkESE~IANO
SP£Cll'ICAT10NIII-W.L9E!IESTitlCTlD
~~~~~~==-~THEY
n-lfllf()f'ISO(~fUI.VUM/TEDTOSIJCH
USEIIErltOOUCTlONP'Vlll.lCATIONOII.

IIEVSE IY -'HY METHOCI INVMQ.E 011. IN
l'AATv.tntol.lTEX~!UW!llrTTEN
CONSBn"~To,v. IS~OHMIITEO TIT\.f
TOTI-lE~SANOP'ECll'ICATIONI
IIEMAIN!NTO,V.WITHOVl"l'IIEJUO!CE
Y1SVAI.COHT4CTWl'THTHESE~SAN0
SN:ClflCATlONSSK,1,LLCOHSlllVTE
~NAFAClfEVIOENCEOFTHE
4CCEP'TANCf~THESEIIESTIUCTIONS
COVER
DATE: 03.31 .21
SCALE: N/A
L-0
PLANTING LEGEND:

PALMS

SYMBOL SIZE BOTANICAL NAME
•
12' B.T.H. CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS
16' B.T.H. SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANUM

ACCENT PALMS
w 15GAL. CYCAS REVOLUTA
• 15GAL. RHAPIS EXCELSA

ACCENT SHRUBS
$ 15GAL. ALCANTAREA IMPERIALIS 'RUBRA'
*
5GAL. CYRTOMIUM FALCATUM
~ 5GAL. LEUCADENDRON 'HAWAII MAGIC'

MEDIUM SHRUBS
• 5GAL. PHILODENDRON 'XANADU'
* 5GAL. POL YSTICHUM MUNITUM
• 5GAL. WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA 'GREY BOX'

SMALL SHRUBS
® 1 GAL. ARCTOSTAPHYLOS HOOKERI 'MONTEREY

CARPET'
~ 5GAL. MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA'
• 5GAL. DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA'
• 5GAL. DIANELLA REVOLUTA 'LIL REV
• 1 GAL. NEOREGELIA 'EOZ'

GROUNDCOVER
t- --- -·I 1 GAL. @ FESTUCA CALIFORNIA 'RIVER HOUSE BLUES' 18" O.C . . . . . .

BIOFILTRATION BASIN
[ill 1 GAL.@ BOUTELOUA GRACI LIS
18" O.C.
.
1 GAL. @ JUNCUS PATENS
18" O.C.

COMMON NAME HEIGHT/ SPREAD FORM/ FUNCTION W\JCOLS
Mediterranean Fan Palm 20' High / 16' Spread Palm Low
Queen Palm 40'-50' High / 16' Palm Moderate I Medium
Spread
Sago Palm 6'-1 0' High / 5' Spread Accent Shrub Low
Lady Palm 8'-12' High/ 6' Spread Accent Shrub Medium
Bromeliad 3' High / 4' Spread Accent Shrub Moderate I Medium Japanese Holly Fem 3' High / 4' Spread Accent Shrub Moderate I Medium Magic Royal Hawaiian 3' High / 4' Spread Accent Shrub Low Cone Bush
Xanadu Philodendron 3' High / 3' Spread Medium Shrub Moderate/ Medium Western Sword Fem 2' High / 2' Spread Medium Shrub Moderate I Medium Grey Box Coast 3' High x 4' Spread Medium Shrub Low
Rosemary
Monterey Carpet 2' High / 4' Spread Low Shrub Low
Manzanita
Dwarf Myrtle 2' High / 2' Spread Low Shrub / Hedge Low
Tasman Flax Lily 3' High / 2' Spread Low Shrub Moderate I Medium Lil Rev Flax Lily 2' High / 2' Spread Low Shrub Low
Variegated Fireball 8" High / 8" Spread Low Shrub Low
Bromeliad
California Fescue 2' High / 2' Spread Groundcover Low
Blue Grama Grass 1' High / 1' SPread Low Shrub Low
California Gray Rush 2' High/ 2' Spread Low Shrub Low
Water
Conservation
Zone
Zone2
Zones 1
Zones 1 & 2
Zone 1
Zone 1
Zones 1
Zone 2
Zones 1
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zones 1 & 2
Zones 1
Zone 2
Zones 1 & 2
Zone 2 & 3
Zone 4
Zone 4
DESIGN STATEMENT:

AS AN INFILL PROJECT, TH E PRIMARY INTENT OF THIS LANDSCAPE PLAN IS TO CREATE A LANDSCAPE DESIGN THAT INTEGRATES A NEWTV'.O STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING OVER GRADE INTO AN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD; WHILE MEETING OR EXCEEDING THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH'S REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT.

SECONDARY ISSUES WILL BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS PLAN AS WELL .

1. WATER MANAGEMENT BMP'S WILL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THE SITE AN D TH E LANDSCAPING.

LASTLY THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL CREATE A PLANT PALETTE SUITED TO THE EXPOSURE ANO CLIMATE OF RENOVATED PROPERTY.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

LOT 4, BLOCK 3, MAP 2143 IN THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BRUSH MANAGEMENT:

THE PROJECT SITE IS SITUATED WITHIN AN URBANIZED AREA AND DOES NOT REQUIRE A BRUSH MANAGEMENT PLAN.

NOTES:

NO TREES OR SHRUBS EXCEEDING THREE FEET IN HEIGHT AT MATURITY SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN TEN FEET OF ANY WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES.

ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY-WIDE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS.THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL LANDSCAPE STANDARDS, AND ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE RELATED RELATED CITY AND REGIONAL STANDARDS.

IRRIGATION:

ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS WILL BE IRRIGATED WITH A FULLY AUTOMATIC, PERMANENT OVERHEAD SPRAY TYPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.

MAINTENANCE:
.LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AREAS IN PROPERTY SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER.

LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AREAS IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER.

THE LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF DEBRIS AND LITTER, AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION. DISEASED OR DEAD PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SATISFACTORILY TREATED OR REPLACED PER THE CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT.

MINIMUM TREE SEPARATION DISTANCE:

TRAFFIC SIGNALS (STOP SIGN) - 20 FEET
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES - 5 FEET'
ABOVE GROUND UTILITY STRUCTURES - 10 FEET
DRIVEWAY (ENTRIES) - 10 FEET
INTERSECTIONS (INTERSECTI NG CURB LINES OF TWO STREETS) -25 FEET 'NOTE THAT THE MINIMUM DISTANCE TO ANY SEWER LINE IS TYPICALLY 10 FEET

FOR CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ,
SEE SHEET L-2.
2030 Galveston Street
San Diego, CA 9211 0
T: (858) 458-0555
www.topialand.com
Boyd
Residence
506 Pacific
Avenue
Solana Beach,
CA
PROJECT NO. 20,007.00
NOTFOR

CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED
Issue Date
~~~:~.:,-:'mt~
~~~~~==-=.T)IEY
~EJl:"~~~~~~CH
IIEUSEIYAHYMETHOOINV....O.fOIIIIN
P'.O.IIIT WITHOUT D~EU 'M'IITTE.N
Cot41€1iTOFTONil5"'0H!IIT!tl TTT\E
TO 1'1111!: l'I.AHI ANO PECll"ICATIOHI
IIIOI.-.W IH Tc.IA WITHOVT 1'11.EJUOICE
Y1SUAlCONTACT'Mn1TMEIE~,_,'fO
SP'ECIFIC.lllOtU SK,ll.L CONSTlTVTE
HlllolAF..OEE'IIOENCEOFTHE ... CCEPTANCE OF THEW: lltl!:STJUCTIOtll Landscape
Development
Plan
Notes & Legend
DATE: 03.31 .21
SCALE: NIA
L-1
New
Dliveway
Column
New Dliveway
Gates
Existing
Sidewalk
New Driveway
Column
New Entry -------1+--+->--+---+->-..,-
Columns &
Pivot Gate
s
L,_ J
'
Existing Wall
to remain
Stucco Finish
Existing Wall
to Remain
New Fence
& Gate
-------
- - -
(TW79.00)
(BW73.70)
19' □~---
------- PARKING ONE SIDE
---- OBSTRUCTED W/ GARAGE
oo~·
---- 2 CAR (;ARA~~ CONCR£t¢ YQARAGE --- ---C
19·-o"
-- - ----------- ------- ------- PARKING ONE SIDE
---- OBSTRUCTED W/ GARAGE
oo~·
----
ti I .~P( ____,rj
ti I
(S
Lower Basin
Coping 68.63
Wl.68.13 LU
z
:::;
>-
f-
(l'.

LU , ----- -7 a.

TCOPI NG 73 p3 0
(l'.

WL 73.13 I a.

I I S2 , 1,7Spa I (l'.
1 1 1 1
coping 73.13 ~ I I I 1WL 73.13 I IL
,LJ_(- ____ _J 0
fI I I ~ :::;
r:---7
1 spa 1 1Coping 7 4.fl6
1WL 74.96 I llllfilL.12.

W I I OOD I I Q L ___ .J
12'-6" TCOPING

68.63 □ FG 68.13
TW 70.75
BW 67.25
R
D Gravel Bed
'?X~ ll+ll,.:..:.....:..f-,-'c,..:.,..:j...:.,..'..M.lh l-- Cable Style Guardrail
FOR LANDSCAPE DEVELOPM ENT NOTES & LEGEND, SEE SHEET L-1 .

FOR W A TER CONSERVATION PLAN & CALCULA TIO N S , SEE SHEET L-3.

FOR E X ISTING TREE DISPOSITION PLAN , SEE SHEET L-4 .

Property Line
Fence
s
2030 Galveston Street San Diego , CA 9211 O
T: (858) 458-0555
www.topialand.com
Boyd
Residence
506 Pacific
Avenue
Solana Beach,
CA
PROJECT NO. 20.007.00
NOTFOR

CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED
Issue Date
Landscape
Dev e lopme n t
P lan
DATE: 03.31.21
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
L-2
HYDROZONELEGEND:-TOTALLANDSCAPE
(HYDROZONE) AREA= 1,974.2 S.F.

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL
~ HYDROZONE 1: PRIVATE PLANTER - 253.33 S.F .
• MIXED MEDIUM WATER USE PLANTING

NORTH/EAST EXPOSURE

10.0% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA
(0 S.F. WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY)
(196.33 S.F. WITHIN PROPERTY LINE)
II HYDROZONE 2 PUBLIC/PRIVATE PLANTER -639.32 S.F. V V 'v V 'v V MIXED LOW WATER USE PLANTING 1'7vvvvv• SOUTH/WEST EXPOSURE V V V 'v 'v V

35.3% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA 'v'v'v 'v 'v'v '
(27.27 S.F. 'MTHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY) 'v'v'v'v'v'v
(669.05 S.F. WITHIN PROPERTY LINE) !'7'v'v'v'v'v
V V V 'il 'v V
lu v" u u v,
~ HYDROZONE 3: PRIVATE PLANTER - 274.96 S.F. 11 LOW WATER USE PLANTING

13.9% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA
(0 S.F. WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY)
(274.96 S.F. WITHIN PROPERTY LI NE)
+ + + HYDROZONE 4: BIO-FILTRATION BASIN -161 .29 S.F.
+ + + + LOW WATER USE PLANTING
+ + + 8.2% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA
+ + + + (0 S.F. WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY)
+ + + (161 .29 S.F. WITHIN PROPERTY LINE)
+ + + +
+ + + ~ ~ ~ ~
_ __ 19•-o~
-------
PARl<ING OHE SIDE
OBSTRUCTED W/ CARA.GE
~9•
___
~
19·-o~
--- ------- PARKING CHE SIDE
OBSTRUCTED W/ GARAGE:
~g•
---

DESCRIPTION
HYDROZONE 5: PUBLIC/PRIVATE ARTIFICIAL TURF -
244.77 S.F.

VERY LOW WATER USE PLANTING

12.4% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA
(78.88 S.F. WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY)
(165.89 S.F. WITHIN PROPERTY LINE)
HYDROZONE 6: ARTIFICIAL TURF - 141.58 S.F.

VERY LOW WATER USE PLANTING

7.2% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA
(0 S.F. 'MTHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY)
(141 .58 S.F. WITHIN PROPERTY LINE)
HYDROZONE 7: SPA/BASIN - 258.95 S.F.

HIGH WATER USE

13.1 % OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA
(0 S.F. WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY)
(258.95 S.F. 'MTHIN PROPERTY LI NE)
(9 118'/!r
D
gJJ
'v'v'vVVV'vV
'vVVV'vv''il'v
'v 'v V V V V 'v V V
VV'v'v'vV'v'v
V'vVVVVVVV
'v'v'v'v'v'v'v'v
'v'vVVV'v'v
WATER CONSERVATION NOTES:

1. PROPOSED TURF AREAS: THERE ARE NO TURF AREAS. THE PERCENTAGE OF TURF OF THE TOTAL DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPED AREA IS 0.0%.

2. XERISCAPE PRINCIPLES APPLIED:

2.1 . THE DESIGN OF THE LANDSCAPE IS INTENDED TO MATCH GROWTH REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANT

COMMUNITIES, TO MODIFY PLANT GROUPINGS TO ACCOUNT FOR SUN AND WIND EXPOSURE, AND TO MINIMIZE WHERE POSSIBLE, WATER AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLANTS WITH SIMILAR

CULTURAL REQUIREMENT OF EXPOSURE, SOILS, AND WATER NEEDS WILL BE GROUPED TOGETHER AND

LOCATED ON THE PROJECT SITE IN MICRO-CLIMATES WH ERE THEY WILL REQUIRE THE LEAST AMOUNT OF WATER FOR OPTI MUM GROWTH AND MAINTENANCE.

2.2. THE SOILS WILL BE TESTED UPON COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING FOR THEIR ABILITY TO SUSTAIN

PLANT GROWTH AND WILL BE AMENDED AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE OPTIMAL CONDITIONS FOR CONTINUING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANT MATERIAL.

ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) WORKSHEET
I ,,,.,._,.,,,_BOYD I ,,.,,,,_,,1a,0w,N..... I ,,.,,,,,.,.._,u506 Pacific Avenue! The µ-c,ecr s Est1mat.cd TC(f,IJ \\111tcr ~ 1scalcul1led ~the . following {PFxHA ) formula· E/1fl.i = (FlOX0.62 ~ +SLA ETWU .. Estunatcd 1aal winer we per year (gallons per )Ur) ET o • EnpotransplfAUOO r11te (LnChcs per year)
PF • Plant Factor from WUCOLS (5Cc Dclin iuau )
HA • Hydro-ZO!le AreA (square feet) Define hydro-zones b)""""l'ltcr U5e very low. low. moderati=:andhigh SLA '"' Special Lnndscapc Atu (~e feel) Edible plants, irrigated with recycled water, & nrfw.ed for llct!\'C plny
Q.62 • Cm.version Facur (to i;:illons per 5quare foot)
IE • lmgatim Efficu:ncy
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE {ET\YU) WORKSHEET Line 1-fydro-zone Number (1 • 4 Below - use as many tables as necessa to oom ete all drazones
2 3
Evapol:rzmspiralion Rate (ETo) Use 41 (west cl 1-5) 147 (east rl 1-5) See "A" beow Conversion Factor - 0 62 2 0.62
(Lme 1 x Line 2) 3 25 42 (we61 of 1-5) I 2G.14 (ea61 ct 1-5) Plant Factor (PF)
See "B 4 0,6 0 ,3 0.3 0.3 ' below
Hyaozone Are3 (HA) • in square feet 5 253.33 639,32 274.96 161.29 (Line 4x Ur,e5) 6 1520 191 .80 82 49 48.39
lrrig.,tion Efficiency (IE)
See "C" below 7 0 .8 1 0.81 0 ,75 0.81
(I.me 6 + Line 7) 8 187 .65 236 ,79 109,98 59.73
TOTAL..r:ia11Une8 boxes +SLA 9 594.15 + 3 10.47 (SheefBelow) = 904.62 Une3x Line 9
Estimated Total Water Use • ETWU 10 (gallons per yea r) Tota 25.42 X 904.62 = 22,995 l shall not exceed MAWA below A B C
l:.T• - !.l' .. -.,N..,._,_,. .,
,1 c,-... ar 1-sJ -47 (eastof J. 5)
,.,.._,.,.,.,.. __ , _UwH'l,COf..J NllfrttllJ
.,_,_....,t•~-,f•rNCill~s,.-,_ 11'1! ... "'---aMl'f"_.,_,,,WM _,....,ii.,.,,.,.,,.,.._,., •• ,,. •. :;,,_ IE- I~~
~ • JJ
.c-,.-;o 6111,&r -..lJ
u,_ ... 1, l)fp&.t&:ro...,,...,,• 81
41 tJ_/,.rz:IJ'" . IO)'Low • ....,.U.w."-ts
Q_J•L ll' -LowlJ'-.,,.U•"""1s
/16 • J.fF-A...,_l'".,_U..l'"-s A,.,,_.., IE -,.,N --'f/--n,o,v,J by,.,,_.,,,,_,_, .,,,.J,,tt I.O-..JJlf".JJ Jl'rJHrU,e/"OU1 IO IN.Oiv"'--r
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER APPLICATION (MA WA} calculation: lin,prtnillijlll"lllOU aclju,tmmt f&dcr (ET M ) Ilk .55 reii&fllial ·~ non• rcsidetir.iil

25.42 [(ETAFx 1,974 )- (1-ETAF x _o __ )] • I MAWA
2542cr:?9l4 TOIOl l.and,a,poA,-~ TotolSLA 27,598
Janua,y2016 ETWU DOES NOT EXCEED MAWA P,g, 3 of 9

ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) WORKSHEET
' ! ___ ,.,,,,_BOYD I ,,.,,,,m.,,o.o.,·...,,. l ,,.i«,..,,,,,,,506 Pacific Avenue I Thc?'a,cct'5 Est1matcdTW.IW11ter ~ 1,e11lcufatOO u:nngthc ro11c,-..,,,ng formula mvu =(EToX0.62(PFxHA +SL4) ET\\'\J • E,tomal<d 1wl •~•«""po-yo,, (!;~loo, po->=) IE ETo • E\'lpottznspirat100 rtlc (inches pa' year) PF • Plant factor from WUCOLSf.ec Ckfin1ti~}
HA • Hydro-zone Arca (square feet)' Odil\C hydro-zon.Cli b:,·water u.,c \'1:ry low. low. modcn1tcandh1i;.h SLA • Special Landscape Arc:, (~ u:irc fect) Edi.hie plrmts.. irrigated v.it.h recycled W3lC'f. & turfu.'lt.-d for 11ct1vc play
Q 6::: A Cooversion Fact{lf (w ~ Uon.-s pe:r sqwre fool) IE • lmgat100 Effic1mcy
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETVlr'U) 'WORKSHEET une Hydro-zone Number (1 • 4 Below - use as many tables as necessa to com ete all drazones
6 Evapotransp1ration Rate {ETo)
See •A• beow Use 41 ("'1!SI cl 1-5) 147 (ecn.t r:i 1-5) Conversion Faaor O 62 062
(Line 1 x Line 2) 25 42 (we<t of 1-5) I 2G.14 (eatt ct 1-5) Plant Factor (PF)
.see ·s· below
Hyaozone Area (HA) in square feet
(Line 4 x Line 5)
Irrigation Efficiency {IE)
See"C- below
(LJne 6 ... Line 7)
TOT AL cl all Line 8 boxes + SLA
LJne3xUne9
0 .1
244 .77
24 48

0.75 32.64
310.47
0 .1 1.0
141 .58 258.95
14 16 258.95

0.75 1

18.88 258.95
Estimated Total Water Use• ETWU
(gallons per year)
Total shall not exceed MAWA below
10 SEE SHEET ABOVE ,\
E'f"••Er••,,..,,.~,..,- 41 (w,si:of I-5)
47 (,a.~tof 1-5}
t'f"-l'kMlf".a•r l '•U-lXXJIS•..i.nr.
,ffl6ffUM_,,..__,,,f,rHdi•f'OH"Ntl.

TM ... .-at..,.,r,urJ'FJKl<llfk,....,......,
-IINM•ttl!rF«••-b<•ll;I..,..·:;,,"".

C
11-: l~FJJJrlnv,-
~ .-.H
R«t,,.~ -IJ
B.J:1,1,r "' "J
Ml',_,,,/JHlr 5 '' Drip & J.k,o.paJ .. ,1
41 0.1 a n: rr . f',n•Lo,.·Jr',w.,,-UM&u
()_J ,. L ll' . U,wll-"ourUM.l'ft»tl.l
CJ6 "' /,111-MoWmtt' llu1er U...,l'J.r.w,
/.0-ll'#' •HI t'#<ll'rr{"s,/'bt/s
Adiffe...,,,1r!-,ylv •t«l1f,,._n,.,,,,,,lb,•"-',,~"""'-.,;.,,,,.1,Jl'C, IO 1:,,/M O l"\'l'kr.twr
MAXIMUM APPLTED WATER APPLICATION (MA WA) calculation: Enpotn1.11J<pir.ii1'111Mtiusl.mc111 l;,c(;...,- (C'f • .t..l"I 11.'it _:-;5 n:std..:ntial J:<; lll'Wl• r ... -sid:1J.ial I
MAWA l(ETAl-·x ~...,.,.-:-,;,.,-:-:.,--;ccc- ) ' (1-ETAFx ___ )I • .'.!5 4'.:!or29.IJ Tot.11Land~CAp,:Ar<::i. Toca! SLA '-----------' J;anuuy 2016 P;age 3 of 9
2030 Galveston Street
San Diego, CA 92110
T: (858) 458-0555
www.topia1and.com
Boyd
Residence
506 Pacific
Avenue
Solana Beach,
CA
PROJECT NO. 20.007.00
NOTFOR

CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED
Issue Date
T1"fllSE~T1"ESE~SAHO
W'EC!r<JC4T10HS PW.l IE fllfSTitlCTEO
TOTHEOltlGnW. SITf FOIIIYMCHTHEY
WEftE!"ftEPAAED.....01"1/11.ICATIOH
Tl-lEl!.EOF IS f)(!"ftfSSI.\I UMITED TO SUCH
USE. fllEPl'IOOUCTIOH. ~ICATIOHOI!
fllEVSEIV.a.Nl'METl-400 IN w--lQ.EOl!IN
l"-'Jl:T WITHOUT fX!"ftEH WIUTTEH
COHU:HT~T~ISl'IIOHIIIITEO TTTJ.f TO Tl-IE P\.ANS ANO s,t:CIFICATIOHS fllEMAIHINTOl"tAV1ITl•IOIJTl"IIIE.IUDICE
Vl.'SUALCOHTACTWITHTHESEl"l..ANSA~
SPECIFlCATIONSSKllllCOl,STfT\/TE
l"IIIMAFACIEEVIC>ENCEOf'THE
-'CCEJl'TANCE~TttESEIIIE.STIIIICTIOHS
Water
Conservation
Plan &
Calculations
DATE: 03.31.21
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"
L-3
=7"' 30 74 75
·c=7A46
v7A 27
FL=7A 20
,c=?A r:,7
FL=74 °7
vv
TC=,4 31
E
~~-~~--~~-.,,.,,~-~---------------------------------------------- s . .
-- EXISTING TREE NOTES:

1. THE CLIENT ASSUM ES ALL RELATED REMOVAL COSTS, INCLUDING THE RESPONSIBILITY OF REPLACING ANY SIDEWALK AND/OR CURB THAT WAS DAMAGED, OR REPAIRING ANY SIDEWAY TRIPPING HAZARDS.

2. ALL MATERIALS SPECIFIED TO THE REMOVED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE PER LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS.

3. PER CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE SECTION 5.408.4, 100% OF TREES, STUMPS, ROCKS AND ASSOCIATED VEGETATION AND SOILS RESULTING FROM LAND CLEANING SHALL BE RE-USED OR RECYCLED.

EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION LEGEND:

PALMS
# BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CALIPER HEIGHT DRIPLINE (RADIUS) ACTION 1 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS Hollywood Juniper 12" 20' 16' To Be Demolished 'TORULOSA'
2 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS Hollywood Juniper 18" 18' 14' To Be Demolished 'TO RU LOSA'
3 PINUS SPECI ES Pine 12" 16' 7' To Be Demolished
4 SCHINUS MOLLE California Pepper Tree 8" 16' 13' To Be Demolished 5 SCHINUS MOLLE Cal~omia Pepper Tree 8" 17' 16' To Be Demolished 6 MELALEUCA SPECIES Melaleuca 10" 23' 18' To Be Demolished

TYPICAL EXISTING TREE

TO BE REMOVED
= -
-
5 - ------: ----- I
§==
----- a .. .,. I - • D I =:
04 i §
~ 05
I
__________ _J I

II - I -
J = ·= ■
15 I •
•: .

I : I • I-!
: :

I a
I e
·' ..

TREE #1
TREE #2 /#3
TREE #4 /#5
TREE #6
2030 Galveston Street
San Diego, CA 92110
T: (858) 458-0555
www.topialand.com
Boyd
Residence
506 Pacific
Avenue
Solana Beach,
CA
PROJECT NO. 20.007.00
NOTFOR

CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED
Issue Date
Existing Tree
Disposition Plan
DATE: 03.31 .21
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"
L-4

ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE AROUND DRIVEWAY
24'-4" -------------- -,(
30'--0" ALLOWABLE

STREET ELEVATION AND GATE DETAILS
(N.T.S.)
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE AROUND WAU0NAY
9'--0"
12'--0" ALLOWABLE
2030 Galveston Street
San Diego, CA 92110
T: (858) 458-0555
www.topialand.com
Boyd
Residence
506 Pacific
Avenue
Solana Beach,
CA
PROJECT NO. 20.007.00
NOTFOR

CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED
Issue Date
THEUSEOFTttf.SE~SAHO
sncll'lCATIOHSSHAlllE"ESTltlCTEO
TOTI,EOIUGIN41.SITEF°"'MtCHTHE'I'
WEIIE~~All:EOAHO~IUCATlOH
TiiElltEOFISEX~ESSI.YUMITEOTOSUCH
USE IIV'ftOOUCTlON 1•ut1UCATIONOft
fltEUSl:IYAIO' METH00, 11'1\'.tiQ.EOIIIIN
PAAT "'1THOVT [X,tt£H WftlTTEH
COHS£HT OFT~ IS ~OHIIITEO Tll\E
TO nu; ,V,.NS AHO ~t:CIF!CATIOHS
IIIEMAININT~v.lTH0VTPIIIEJUOICE
V15UALCOl'ltACTWITHTHESE"1.AHSAH0
Sl'ECll'ICATlONSIHAllCONSTrlVTE
,•,uMA.FAaEEYIDENCEOFTHE
ACCEPTAHCEOFTtESEIIESTIIIICTIOHS
Street
Elevation
DATE: 03.31 .21
SCALE: 114" = 1'-0"
L-5

APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT
(Structure Development Permit)
Project No.: DRP20-014/SDP-020

RECEIVED
JUN O 3 2021
Community Development Dept.

City of Solana Beach

1. Address of property for which the structure development permit has been requested:
506 Pacific Ave Solana Beach, CA 92075

2. Provide the following information for the individual filing this Application for Assessment:

Name: Kathleen de Paolo
Address: 504 Pacific Ave Solana Beach, CA 92075
Phone Number: 858-376-7820 =-=-c::-..;.--'-='---'--"'-==.. ____________________ _ Email: [email protected]

3. Description of the viewing area as defined in Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance, Section

17.63.020(1) and extent of impairment: ~Impaired viewing area from second floor master bedroom picture window, which faces northeast with a vegetation and rooftops view extending to hills east of I-5. Approximately 80% of window will be blocked. Proposed south facing windows and balcony create privacy concern into master bedroom.

4. Identify the portion of the proposed structure which is the most objectionable and suggestions to minimize the view impairment: The second story on the south side of the proposed home extends from the front to rear setback, 5' from property line. Potential mitigations include reducing blockage, changing south facing window configuration, and providing screening vegetation.

5. Description of the Claimants attempt(s) to resolve this issue with the owner/representative of the property for which a Structure Development Permit has been requested: Discussions in progress with representative Eric Buchanan, regarding concerns with view, privacy, and daylight impacts.
ature of Applicant for Assessment Date Submitted
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~------------ STAFF USE ONLY:

Application for Assessment fee paid?
6-2019

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
View Assessment Commission Action Minutes
Tuesday, August 17, 2020- 6:00 P.M. Regular Mtg.

Teleconference Location Only-City Hall/Council Chambers 635 South Highway 101, Solana Beach, CA 92075
Minutes contain a summary of the discussions and actions taken by the View Assessment Commission during a meeting are video recorded and archived as a permanent record.

The video recording captures the complete proceedings of the meeting and is available for viewing on the City's website.

1. CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL
Chairperson Coad called the View Assessment Commission Meeting to order at 6:04PM on Tuesday, August 17, 2021 in the Council Chambers at 635 South Highway 101, Solana Beach.

Present: VAC Members:

Staff Members:

Absent:

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Pat Coad, Paul Bishop, Matt Cohen, Robert
Moldenhauer, Robert Zajac, and Linda Najjar
Joseph Lim Community Development Director; Katie
Benson, Senior Planner; John Delmer, Junior Planner;
Elizabeth Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney;
Frank Stribling
Chairperson Coad called for a motion to approve the agenda. Motion made by Commissioner Bishop, seconded by Commissioner Zajac, passed 6/0/1 (Stribling absent).

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Speaker time limit: 3 minutes)
There were no speakers.

4. Approval of the Minutes
No Meeting Minutes were provided in the Agenda Packet. The previous minutes will be approved at the next scheduled council meeting.

Chairperson Coad called for a motion to approve the agenda 1/21/2020. Motion made my Commissioner Moldenhauer, seconded by Chairperson Coad. 5/0/2 (Najjar and Stribling Recused)
Chairperson Coad called for a motion to approve the agenda 2/18/2020. Motion made my Commissioner Zajac, seconded by Commissioner Bishop. 6/0/1 (Stribling Recused) VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday,August17,2020
Page No. 2

5. DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd Residence - 506 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Applicant Information:

Name: Jim and Kathleen Boyd
Representative:

Name:

Phone:

Eric Buchanan - Oasis Architecture & Design, Inc
(619) 204-8248
Email: [email protected]
Claimant Information:

Name: Kathy de Paolo
Address: 504 Pacific Ave
Description of Project:

The Applicants are requesting the · approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SOP) to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence built above a basement with an attached two-car garage, and perform associated site improvements. The 6,120, square foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The following is a breakdown of the proposed floor area:

Proposed First Floor
Proposed Second Floor
Proposed First Floor Garage
Proposed Basement
Subtotal
Required Parking Exemption
Basement Exemption
Total Floor Area Proposed
Maximum Allowable Floor Area (SROZ)
1,388 SF
1,562 SF
470SF
1,276 SF
4,696 SF
-400 SF
-1 ,276 SF
3,020 SF
3,021 SF
As specified in the SOP Notice, the maximum building height of the residence is proposed at 24.95 feet above the proposed grade with the highest pole at 98.03 Mean Sea Level (MSL).

The project requires a DRP for grading in excess of 100 cubic yards, for a structure that exceeds 60% of the maximum allowable floor area, and for a second floor that exceeds 35% of the floor area of the first floor.

Chairperson Coad read the preamble.

Katie Benson, Senior Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation describing the project. A copy of the PowerPoint will be included in the project file.

Commissioner Bishop asked if Staff received any correspondence that demonstrates efforts VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday,August17,2020
Page No. 3
between the applicant and claimants to resolve the view issues.

Commissioner Cohen requested to see the photos in Staffs presentation again.

The Commissioners stated their disclosures (as shown on table below) regarding dates they visited the properties.

Commissioner Cohen disclosed that he did not enter either of the properties. He only viewed the properties from the public right of way.

Assistant City Attorney Mitchell confirmed that there were no ex parte communications.

Mark Morris, Representative of the Applicants, presented a PowerPoint presentation and described their project and the communications they had with the Claimants. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be included in the project file.

Commissioners had questions, and Mr. Buchanan addressed their questions.

Kathy De Paolo, Claimant, presented a PowerPoint presentation and described her concerns of view blockage they would have by the proposed project. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be included in the file.

Commissioners had questions for Ms. De Paolo and Staff. All their questions were addressed.

Mr. Morris addressed issues that were brought up by the Claimants.

Commissioners had questions for the Applicant and Staff. All their questions were addressed.

Chairperson Coad called for a motion to close the public hearing. No one made a motion.

Chairperson Coad called for a motion to keep the public hearing open. Motion made my Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Chairperson Coad. 6/0/1 (Stribling Absent) Comissioner Cohen asked the applicant and claimant if they would consent to continue the meeting to a later date.

The applicant and claimant stated they would be open to a continuance until he next regularly scheduled VAC meeting.

Motion made my Commissioner Cohen to close the public meeting, seconded by Chairperson Coad. 6/0/1 (Stribling Absent)
VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday,August17,2020
Page No. 4
The Commissioners gave their findings as shown below:

Kathy de Paolo Coad Bishop Cohen Moldenhauer Stribling Zajac Najjar 504 Pacific Ave Date Claimant 8/13 8/17 8/17 8/9 & 8/15 8/09 8/09
Visited Applicant 8/12 8/16 8/17 8/9 8/09 8/09 & 8/13
Primary Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Roof Deck 2nd Floor Roof Deck Viewing Area Deck #1. Communication y y y y y Taken Place
#2. No Public View y y y y y Impairment
#3. Designed to
Minimize View N N N N N
Impairment
#4. No Cumulative y y y N y View Impairment
#5. Neighborhood y y y N y Compatibility
Chairperson Coad called for a motion. Commissioner Cohen made a motion to reopen the meeting to ask the Applicant if they would consider a continuance. Motion seconded by Chairperson Coad, passed 6/0/1 (Absent- Stribling). The applicant and claimant agreed to consent to an extension of the meeting longer than 30 days.

Commissioner Cohen made a motion to close the public meeting, seconded by Commissioner Zajac. 6/0/1 (Stribling Absent)
Commissioner Cohen made a motion to reopen the public meeting and continue the meeting to a date no later than November 16, 2021. Motion seconded by Chairperson Coad, passed 6/0/1 (Absent - Stribling).

6. VAC MEMBER COMMENTS/ DISCUSSION
Commissioner Najjar asked about the next regularly scheduled VAC meeting.

7. STAFF COMMENTS/ DISCUSSION
There were no comments from Staff.

8. ADJOURNMENT
y
y
y
y
N
The motion made by Commissioner Zajac to close the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Najjar, passed 6/0/1 (Absent - Stribling).

VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday,August17,2020
Page No. 5
Chairperson Coad declared the meeting adjourned at 8:25 PM.

Minutes as approved by V.A.C. on iDj\~j]J__ . Respectfully sub . · \ ~ILL: .

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH www.cityofsolanabeach.org
635 SOUTH H IGHWAY 101 • SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 • (858) 720-2400 • Fax (858) 720-2455

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
View Assessment Commission Notice of Recommendation
Tuesday. January 18, 2022 - 6:00 P.M. Regular Mtg.

PROJECT CASE NO:

PROJECT LOCATION:

DRP20-014/SDP20-020 Boyd Residence
506 Pacific Ave. , Solana Beach
APPLICANT NAME: Jim and Kathleen Boyd
APPLCIANT CONTACT: Eric Buchanan
PRESENT VAC MEMBERS: Paul Bishop, Pat Coad, Matthew Cohen, Robert Moldenhauer, Linda Najjar, and Robert Zajac,
STAFF MEMBERS:

ABSENT:

Joseph Lim, Community Development Director, Katie
Benson, Senior Planner, Elizabeth Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney, John Delmer, Junior Planner
Frank Stribling
ASSESSMENT FILED BY:

Name: Kathy de Paolo
Address: 504 Pacific Ave., Solana Beach
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The Applicants are requesting the approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SOP) to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement two-story, single-family residence built above a basement with an attached twocar garage, and perform associated site improvements. The 6, 120, square foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The following is a breakdown of the proposed floor area:

Proposed First Floor
Proposed Second Floor
Proposed First Floor Garage
Proposed Basement
Subtotal
Required Parking Exemption
Basement Exemption
1,388 SF
1,479 SF
448SF
1,274 SF
4,589 SF
-400 SF
- 1,274 SF
Total Floor Area Proposed 2,915 SF
Maximum Allowable Floor Area (SROZ) 3,021 SF
January 18, 2022

VAC NOR

Page 2 of 3 ends

The maximum building height is proposed at 24.87 feet above the proposed grade with the highest poles at 97.95 feet above mean sea level (MSL). A SOP is required for new construction in excess of 16 feet in height.

VAC RECOMMENDATION:

The project was originally heard at the August 17, 2021 meeting which was conducted via teleconference in accordance with Government Code sections 54953(e) and 54954.3 and other applicable law. After the Commissioners presented their findings and they discussed their choices, Commissioner Cohen made a motion to reopen the meeting to ask the Applicant if they would consider a continuance, seconded by Chairperson Coad, passed 6/0/1 (AbsentStribling). The applicant and claimant consented to continue the meeting. Commissioner Cohen made a motion to reopen the public meeting and continue the meeting to a later date, seconded by Chairperson Coad, passed 6/0/1 (Absent- Stribling).

The project was continued to the January 18, 2022 meeting which was conducted via teleconference in accordance with Government Code sections 54953(e) and 54954.3 and other applicable law. During the meeting, Mr. Buchanan did not consent to a continuance and requested that the VAC make a recommendation instead of continuing the project to a later date.

After additional discussion between the Commissioners, Chairperson Cohen made a motion to recommend denial of the project, seconded by Commissioner Coad. Motion passed 5/1/1 Ayes: Cohen, Bishop, Coad, Moldenhauer, Najjar. Noes: Zajac. Absent:

Stribling
FINDINGS:

1. The Applicants for the Structure Development Permit have made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the Claimants requesting view assessment. Written evidence of a good faith voluntary effort to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve view impairment issues.

Yes - Written accounts and oral testimony at the public meeting showed that there had been communication between the Applicants and the Claimant.

2. The proposed structure does not significantly impair any view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bikeways, walkways, equestrian trails), which has been identified in the City's General Plan or City designated viewing areas.

Yes - The subject property is not located within designated public viewing areas; therefore, the proposed structure does not significantly impair views from public property.

January 18, 2022

VAC NOR

Page 3 of 3 ends

3. The proposed structure is not designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

No - The majority of the VAC members found that the proposed residence was not designed or situated to minimize impairment of views. The VAC members found that more could be done to minimize the impairment of views from the de Paolo Residence.

4. There is significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application as proposed.

Yes - The majority of the VAC members found thatthere would not be significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application if adjacent lots were allowed to construct a development of a similar size and height.

5. The proposed structure in general is not compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

Yes - The majority of the VAC members found that the proposed development is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character. The development would be compatible with the existing neighboring structures in terms of design, bulk, scale, height and size.

VAC Vote:

Chairperson Cohen made a motion to recommend denial of the project, seconded by Commissioner Coad. Motion passed 5/1/1 Ayes: Cohen, Bishop, Coad, Moldenhauer, Nanar.

Noes: Zajac. Absent: Stribling
lssu Date of VAC Recommendation: January 18, 2022
e s, P ncipal Planner , Chair
Liaison, View Assessment Committee ent Committee
Attachment 6
Applicants’ Request for Approval
This document was not available at the time of publishing and will be circulated as a Blue Folder once received.

Kathleen de Paolo
504 Pacific Ave
Solana Beach, CA 92075
May 4, 2022
City of Solana Beach
Att: Katie Benson
635 S. Hwy 101
Solana Beach, CA 92075
DRP20-014/SDP20-010 Boyd Residence – 506 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Dear Katie:

This correspondence is provided as input to City Council with regard to the above referenced application. I have concerns that the project as designed does not meet the following required DRP/SDP findings:

VAC Finding 3: SBMC Chapter 17 60.040 Subsection F, Finding 3 The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

DRP Finding 2: SBMC Chapter 17 68.040 Subsection F, Criteria 1 and 2

1. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses. The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and complementary to existing development in the immediate vicinity of the project site and the surrounding neighborhood. The development as proposed shall also be compatible in scale, apparent bulk, and massing with such existing development in the surrounding neighborhood. Site planning on or near the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects.

2. Building and Structure Placement. Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed to minimize adverse impacts on the surrounding properties and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhance their intended use and complement existing site topography. Multi-family residential buildings shall be sited to avoid crowding and to allow for a functional use of the space between buildings.

Please see attached for additional detail.

Sincerely,
Kathleen de Paolo
1 Background and Attempts to Resolve
We live at 504 Pacific Ave, in the home immediately to the south of the proposed project. This has been our home since Aug 1999. Our main living area is on the north side of the first floor, directly adjacent to the project. My master bedroom window (located on the second floor) faces the project and is my primary viewing area.

When the story poles went up in May 2021, I reached out to the project architects Mark and Eric. This was the first communication to or from the applicant regarding the project, attached for reference.

Since then, we have attempted to find a mutual agreement that allows the Boyds to build a new home that meets all of their needs, while allowing my family to not lose valuable views, privacy, and daylight from our home. We met over Zoom and on property, and shared emails, photos, and documents back and forth. Jim and I also met several times in the neighborhood to discuss the matter.

The applicant has already made a number of adjustments to the design, for which I have been appreciative. The initial design maximized the applicant’s utility within the building envelope, without contemplating the impacts on my property. It is no small feat to address this after the fact, and the architects have done an admirable job finding ways to make improvements within those constraints.

The question before the Council, however, is whether the SDP and DRP findings can be made for the current design as it stands today. Unfortunately, the current design still poses significant issues, which are outlined in this letter.
2 VAC Finding 3
SBMC Chapter 17 60.040 Subsection F, Finding 3:

The structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

Summary: The current design blocks most of my primary view. Modifications since the January 18 View Assessment Commission, in which 4 of the 6 commissioners could not make Finding 3, have only restored an incremental ~5% of the view.

Primary Viewing Area
• The city of Solana Beach recognizes the hillsides, canyons, and natural geographic features as a limited natural resource (SBMC 17.63.010)
• The View Assessment Committee is asked to look at the totality of the view, not just size and quality, but how it is utilized from within the home, and its importance to the resident. (Toolkit p. 12)
Using these guidelines, I determined that the northeast view from my master bedroom is my primary viewing area.

This is not an ocean view; in fact, there are no ocean views from inside our home. This nature view is very important to me, however, due to its unique capture of the diverse features of our city, and its location in the home. It offers a serene, private view of rooftops and vegetation, extending to edge of the San Elijo Lagoon and the hills east of I-5.

This is an area of the home that is utilized daily, throughout the day, especially since my work has transitioned to full remote and I am home all of the time. The master suite is important to 3 any home, but in particular I consider the space a sanctuary and refuge, and my bed faces this north window.

We also have outdoor views from our master balcony and roof deck. In contrast with the master bedroom, these views are used far less often. When we want to be outdoors and see the ocean, there is a better, completely unobstructed view to be had by walking across the street to the beach.

In the 2nd VAC meeting on January 18, 2022, 4 of 6 commissioners determined the view from the master bedroom window to be my primary viewing area. One commissioner picked the master balcony, and one picked the roof deck.

View Blockage
The current proposal blocks most of my primary view. Below is a rendering of the current proposal provided by the applicant’s architects.

Per the VAC Toolkit, the Ordinance does not create a right to an unobstructed view. The toolkit p. 11 states: On new construction, the second story bulk should be placed to minimize the impact to existing views. The Toolkit illustrates a view corridor created by limiting the 2nd story to 50% of buildable lot width, excluding setbacks.

The VAC commissioners felt more needs to be done to alleviate 2nd story massing and improve my master bedroom view. Several mentioned the 50% buildable area guideline.

PROPOSED DESIGN
4 As the commission noted, there is also adverse impact to view due to the roof deck located on top of the 2nd story. This 3rd level of the structure creates additional massing and height that reduce the view.

Restoring a 50% view corridor to my master bedroom and alleviating the height of the overall structure would, as illustrated below, make a significant difference to the quality of light and view in this room.

With such a solution, I will still lose significant daylight and view, including much of the view to the San Elijo Lagoon. A partial hillside view could be restored, however, with the planned removal of the tree in the back yard, and the daylight situation would be improved.

Compared to the current proposal, this would more equitably represent “the best balance between the owner’s desire to protect his/her property in accordance with applicable regulations, and the neighbor’s desire to protect his/her view”, as contemplated in the VAC Toolkit.
5 DRP Finding 2 Criterion 2
Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed to minimize adverse impacts on the surrounding properties
Summary: The current design does not minimize adverse impacts to surrounding properties, due to the size and placement of its 2nd story mass which impacts daylight as well as view. It also introduces adverse impacts to the utility of areas of our home due to privacy issues.

Daylight
The proposed design does not follow SBMC guidelines regarding daylight planes, and will have adverse impact to light in our home.

SBMC Chapter 17.20 (H) specifies Daylight Plane Height: Within the (ER-1), (ER-2), (LR), (LMR), (MR), (MHR) and (HR) zones all new structures and structural additions shall be encouraged, but not required, to be designed to use a daylight plane beginning at a vertical height of 16 feet above any two designated setback lines and sloping toward the interior of the lot at a 30 degree angle (from horizontal) until the 25-foot height limit is reached.

In addition, the VAC toolkit p. 3 suggests that daylight planes can be used to reduce bulk and allow light and air to pass through to neighboring properties.

These guidelines are designed to alleviate the types of adverse effects introduced by the structure as currently designed.

The image below shows the street facing view of project provided in the architectural drawings.

The most important areas of my home lie immediately to the right of this view. The portion of the 2nd floor to the right of the blue line encroaches into the daylight plane. ----
NEW&O'.tO ~ .INELED G..._...DOOR
I
~
$ ;1::P=~
o·-o· I'-.
~
11!!1. • 1J.~ ·,
6 Multiple architects I spoke with warned this will adversely affect light into my main living areas.

The proximity of the 2nd story mass will block light through the dining room bay window, which provides natural light to the center of our main living area. It will also block light into the kitchen meal prep and eating areas through the kitchen skylight and the kitchen transom windows. This is illustrated in the photos below.

Following the daylight plane guidelines provided by the city for this purpose would provide significant improvements in the dining area, as seen from the photos below, taken sitting at the dining table. The following visualizations based on story pole placement approximate the living space light with the current proposal (left), versus the project when modified to comply with daylight planes (right).

X
X
7 x
Daylight planes will also restore light to the kitchen through the skylight and transom windows, as seen in the photos below (current proposal on left versus with daylight planes on right). 8 Other Adverse Impacts
In addition to adverse impacts on view and daylight, both the SBMC and VAC Toolkit recognize the importance of privacy.
• “Privacy” means reasonable protection from intrusive visual observation and/or noise. (SBMC 17.63.020)
• Privacy and views are sometimes in conflict. Views are very important, but so is privacy. (VAC Toolkit p13)
Master Balcony
The planned master balcony looks directly into the master bedroom, the kitchen, and the dining area, as illustrated in the photos below.

We had previously agreed to a full height frosted glass panel on the south side of the balcony, which would solve this problem. The current drawings replace the glass panel with planting.

Unfortunately, plants can die and subsequent homeowners or renters may not maintain them.

Given the seriousness of the privacy issue, a durable, permanent solution as provided by the frosted glass is needed.
9 Roof deck
The roof deck looks directly down through my master bedroom window, as shown below.

Virtually every part of my bedroom is visible from the roof deck, notably including the bed which faces the window.

This roof deck is a bit unusual in that it is accessed directly from the main living area. It is big enough to accommodate large social gatherings and parties. This six-bedroom proposed design, which includes 2 master suites, would be a very attractive rental for large groups. As such, noise is a concern as well as visual privacy.

The roof deck presents adverse impact not only to daylight and view, but to the intended use of my master bedroom. The below visualization uses the story poles to demonstrate the problem. 10 DRP Finding 2 Criterion 1:

The development as proposed shall be compatible in scale, apparent bulk, and massing with such existing development in the surrounding neighborhood.

Summary: The project is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood due to massing of the 2nd story and the 3rd level roof deck.

The 2nd story massing of the project exceeds the norm for the neighborhood. In the January VAC meeting, the claimant provided photos of 4 large two-story homes in the immediate vicinity. However, even in these specific examples, 3 of the 4 homes have a 2nd story that is significantly smaller than the 1st story, alleviating mass at the top level. The proposed development uses almost the entire buildable area of the 2nd story.

In addition, the project presents massing and apparent bulk at greater height due to the roof deck. The top of the roof deck railing is at the maximum allowable height of 25 feet.

Eliminating this element would alleviate bulk, improving daylight and view. 11 In the VAC meeting on 8/17/21, Commissioner Moldenhauer reported that he walked the immediate neighborhood, including the 400 and 500 blocks of Pacific Ave, all of Circle Dr, the 500 block of Acacia Street, and the 200 blocks of Solana Vista and Ocean St. In total he viewed 83 residences and found 60% to be single story, and 40% two story. Only 3 out of the 83 residences had 3rd level roof decks.

Commissioners Moldenhauer and Najar both felt that a roof deck on top of a 2nd story is not compatible with the neighborhood. Additionally, Commissioners Coad, Bishop and Cohen pointed out the roof deck leads to other issues with view.

Conclusion
Before this project is approved, I believe the issues identified above must be addressed. As currently proposed, the project’s 2nd story bulk, height, daylight planes, as well as privacy issues, do not meet the requirements of Solana Beach Municipal Code, as VAC finding 3 and DRP finding 2 cannot be made.
12 Attachment
Gmail
506 Pacific Ave
1 m essage
Kathy de Paolo <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
:Hi Eric,
Kathy de Paolo <[email protected]>
Fri, May 28. 2021 at 7:52 Pt.1
I ho pe you are domg well. I was rererred 1o you by the Cily or Solana Beach notioe as 1he Bl"dlilecl/representalive for Iha project at 506 Pacific Ave in Sotana Beach.

I am the property owner at 504 Pacific, immecfialely south of lhe suti;ect property: I am reaching out because I have a few concerns with the cuu ent plans, whicll I look forward lo wooo119 with you to address. ]Because the second story on the south side of the propos.ed home ex.tends from Itta fronl lo rear 5Blback and is 5' from 1he property li.ne. ii 'nil impact ltghl inlo my di.ni~ and kitchen area, which has a large first ~oor window adjacent lo the property line and skyight. that fac86 the pro,pooed projecl !El:w.acy
The proposed wi.ncfmv oonfigura1ion on the south side of the second story impacts privacy lhro'-Qh Iha same d.ii~ room 'tW1dow and kitchen skylight, as well as offering views into my main llvi.ng area lhrou.gh north faci~ transom windows.

Add itionally, the proposed 6BCOnd Door 'l'lindows on lhe soulh side face d. ectly into my master bedroom 'l'lind'ow. The propooed second floor dedt oo the south side and: roor dad also create privacy conoems with my master bedroom.

I currently have a private vegetalion and rooftops view fiom Iha above-menl iooed master bedroom window. thal extends 1o lhe hills on the olher side of 1-5. This view is blocked by lhe strucl1Jre as proposed.

I would love to gel your though.ls as to how these con.cems can be mitigated.

I can best be reached at this email. I am al:so happy to set up• -me lo• talk on lhe phone or over a Zoom call. Please lel me know what works be6l for you .
l<ind regards,
l<a hy de Paolo
4/25/22, 4:02 PM Gmail - Requested letter for SB City Council https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=847875636b&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1731111687912286371&simpl=msg-f%3A1731111687912286371 1/1 Jim Boyd <[email protected]>
Requested letter for SB City Council
1 message
Cindy Metcalfe <[email protected]> Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 3:59 PM To: [email protected], Katie Benson <[email protected]> Dear members of the City Council,
We own and live at 508 Pacific Ave in Solana Beach and are neighbors to the north of the new home proposed by Jim and Kathleen Boyd at 506 Pacific Ave, Solana Beach. With the understanding that the Boyd’s proposal for a new home will be considered by the City Council at the next May meeting, we have reviewed the story poles as of April 20,2022 and are willing to waive any requirement that the poles have been available for viewing for 30 days.

Regards,
Richard and Cindy Metcalfe
Gmail
Text message sent from neighbors Pete and Shari Mitchell (from Istanbul, Turkey, where they were vacationing).
<•
Letter to council.

April 21, 2022
Pete
Dear Members of the City Council:

We are residents of Solana Beach, who live at 505
Pacific Ave and are
neighbors to the west of the new home proposed by
Jim and Kathleen Boyd at 506
Pacific Ave, Solana Beach.

With the understanding that the Boyd's proposal for a
new home will be considered by
the City Council at the next May meeting, we have
viewed the story poles as of April 20,
2022 and are willing to waive any requirement that
the poles have been available for
viewing for 30 days.

Thank you for considering our input.

Regards, Pete and Shari Mitchell. 505 Pacific Av.

Solana Beach.

Subject
G D) Reply
. @.

COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # B.2.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Development Review Permit (DRP) Time
Extension to Increase the Height of an Existing Seawall and Mid- and Upper-Coastal Bluff Repair at 325 and 327
Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach. Case No: CUP/DRP 17-18-
28; Applicants: Laughlin and Greenberg, Resolution 2022- 048
BACKGROUND:

The Applicants, Peter Laughlin and Renita Greenberg, are requesting approval of an 18- month Time Extension for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Development Review Permit (DRP) for an emergency permit to increase the height of an existing seawall, reconstruct the mid- and upper- coastal bluff and landscape the reconstructed bluff with non-invasive, drought tolerant, salt tolerant native plant species on the coastal bluff below 325 and 327 Pacific Avenue.

A CUP is required for a coastal bluff retention device. A DRP is required for projects with an aggregate grading quantity in excess of 100 cubic yards.

The issue before the Council is whether to adopt Resolution 2022-048 (Attachment 1) approving the Applicants’ request to formally extend the project approvals as provided under the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) 17.72.110 for 18 months.

DISCUSSION:

In May of 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 2019-074 (Attachment 2) approving a CUP and DRP to increase the height of the existing seawall from 15 feet (at the lowest point) to 35 feet. Erodible concrete would backfill the proposed wall extension and be placed at the top of the wall to an elevation of 40 feet above MSL in order to encapsulate May 11, 2022
Time Extension TE22-001
Laughlin/Greenberg

Page 2 of 5 ends

the clean sand lens. The wall would tie into the existing 35 foot high walls to the north and south and would be hand sculpted and colored to resemble the natural bluff. The midand upper-bluff repair would consist of importing 715 cubic yards of soil that would be stabilized with the use of geogrid, soil nails, and grade beams. The reconstructed bluff would then be landscaped with native, non-invasive, drought tolerant and salt tolerant plants that would be watered with temporary irrigation. Plans are provided in Attachment

3. A condition of project approval required the Applicants to receive California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval prior to grading permit issuance. The Applicants submitted their application to the CCC on August 7, 2019. The CCC approved the project at the December 2021 Commission meeting and they received the Notice of Intent to Issue a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) in March of 2022. The discretionary approval under Resolution 2019-074 had an expiration date of May 22, 2021 (Attachment 2). However, in June 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-087 authorizing The City Manager to allow for a temporary time extension for projects that have not received a building/grading permit for one year. The permit approval was extended to May 22, 2022.

The Applicants’ representative reached out by email to the City more than 60 days prior to the expiration date. They didn’t anticipate that they would be able to complete all of the special conditions of the CDP and get their grading permit issued prior to the expiration date. Staff acknowledged this communication as initiating the extension process on May 14, 2022 and the Applicants submitted a formal application by appointment in accordance with SBMC Section 17.72.110 on March 25, 2022.

SBMC Section 17.72.110(B)(1) indicates that:

One or more (but not more than a total of four) extensions may be granted not exceeding a cumulative total of 24 months after the date the original approval of the project expires. The duration of an extension shall be in an increment of 30 days. The minimum duration of an extension shall be six months. The maximum duration of an extension shall not be more than 12 months. The duration of an extension shall be determined at the discretion of the issuing authority.

The Applicants are requesting to extend the expiration by 18 months to October 22, 2023 due to unique circumstances around the permit. The Applicants indicate that it would take between 4 to 6 months to complete the special conditions of the CDP. Then work could begin anywhere between late 2022 and early 2023 but could be delayed until fall of 2023.

Timing would be dependent on the contractor’s schedule and tidal conditions.

Construction is estimated to take around 6 months. It should be noted that construction on the beach is prohibited between Memorial Day (May 30th this year) and Labor Day (September 5th this year). The project extension application completed by the Applicants’ representative, which provides the request for a DRP extension as well as the Applicants’ proposed timeline is included in Attachment 4. If the Council is unable to extend the permit by 18 months, the Applicants are requesting a 12-month extension.

May 11, 2022
Time Extension TE22-001
Laughlin/Greenberg

Page 3 of 5 ends

SBMC Section 17.72.110 establishes that Council action is required to review and act on a request for an extension of a CUP when Council was the original approving body. The Council may extend the approval of a project if they are able to make the seven (7) required findings, which are as follows:

1. The applicants have presented facts which establish that the applicants have timely and diligently pursued issuance of a building permit during the 24 month period following the issuance of the original approval for the project (or the different period set forth as a condition of approval of the project) or during the then current extension period;

2. Circumstances beyond the applicants’ control have intervened and prevented the applicants from obtaining the issuance of a building permit for the project prior to expiration of the 24 month period (or the expiration date established as a condition of the approval) or during the then current extension period;

3. The application for the extension sets forth a reasonable and substantial factual basis for issuance of the extension;

4. There is a substantial factual basis to determine that the applicants will be able to perform the actions necessary to obtain issuance of a building permit prior to expiration of the requested extension;

5. The duration of the extension requested by the applicants is not longer than is reasonably necessary to perform the actions necessary to obtain the issuance of a building permit;

6. There have not been any significant changes in the general plan, applicable specific plan, if any, zoning, or character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent, incompatible, or nonconforming therewith; and

7. The granting of an extension shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

If the Council can make the required findings to approve a time extension, the Applicants will complete the CCC Special Conditions and submit grading plans to the City of Solana Beach and complete the conditions required by the Resolution of approval and begin construction when possible.

There have not been any substantial changes to the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance or character of the area that would make the previously approved project incompatible or nonconforming. There is also no indication that the project would be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare of the properties within the surrounding area. The delay in this matter is the result of the project review by the CCC.

May 11, 2022
Time Extension TE22-001
Laughlin/Greenberg

Page 4 of 5 ends

Should the Council approve the extension, the Applicants will be required to comply with the conditions of the project approval from Resolution 2019-074 (Attachment 2) and commence construction no later than October 2023. Should the request for an extension of the project be denied, a new application would then be required for the project.

The draft Resolution of Approval has been prepared by Staff for the consideration of the Council. The draft Resolution is based upon the information provided in this report. The Council may direct Staff to modify Resolution 2022-048 to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a part of the public hearing process. In the alternative, if Council determines the request is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for an action to be taken at a subsequent Council meeting.

Public Hearing Notice
Notices of a Public Hearing for this project were mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project site more than 10 days prior to the Council date. As of the date of preparation of this Staff Report, no phone calls, letters, or emails have been received by Staff in regard to the extension request.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Time Extensions are not a project as defined by CEQA. The original project was found exempt pursuant to the 2019 State of California CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(b)(c).

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Approve the requested time extension.
∙ Deny the request for a time extension.
∙ Provide direction to Staff.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council disclosures, Receive public testimony, Close the Public Hearing.

2. If the Council can make the required findings, adopt Resolution 2022-048, approving the request for an 18 month Time Extension for approvals and entitlements in Case No. 17-18-28 and setting the expiration date on October 22, 2023.

May 11, 2022
Time Extension TE22-001
Laughlin/Greenberg

Page 5 of 5 ends

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation

_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2022-048

2. Resolution 2019-074

3. Project Plans

4. Extension Request
RESOLUTION 2022-048

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY

APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY

APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT TO INCREASE THE

HEIGHT OF AN EXISTING SEAWALL AND

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE MID- AND UPPER-COASTAL
BLUFF AT 325 AND 327 PACIFIC AVENUE IN SOLANA
BEACH
APPLICANTS: PETER LAUGHLIN AND

RENITA GREENBERG
CASE NO.: TE22-001 TIME Extension
WHEREAS, Peter Laughlin and Renita Greenberg (hereinafter referred to as “Applicants”) have submitted a request for a time extension of the approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Development Review Permit (DRP) to increase the height of an existing seawall, reconstruct the mid- and upper- coastal bluff and landscape the reconstructed bluff with non-invasive, drought tolerant, salt tolerant native plant species for pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning), of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 2019-074 approving the project at the regularly scheduled May 22, 2019 City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have requested an 18-month extension of the project approval; and
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the time extension request and minor modifications; and WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of SBMC

17.72.030 of the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the request for a Time Extension; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found that a Time Extension Request is not a project according to the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; however, the City Council found that the original project was found exempt pursuant to the 2019 State of California CEQA Guidelines Sections15269(b)(c); and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the Hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the Hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

Resolution 2022-048
TE22-001Time Extension

Page 2 of 4 ends

1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

1. That the request for an 18 month Time Extension for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Development Review Permit (DRP) for an emergency permit to increase the height of an existing seawall, reconstruct the mid- and upper- coastal bluff and landscape the reconstructed bluff with non-invasive, drought tolerant, salt tolerant native plant species on the coastal bluff below 325 and 327 Pacific Avenue setting the new expiration date for October 22, 2023 is conditionally approved based on the following Findings and on all terms and conditions of Resolution 2019-074, which are in effect along with the Time Extension:

2. FINDINGS:

A. In accordance with Section 17.72.110 (Lapse of Approval and Extensions) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The Applicants have presented facts which establish that the Applicants have timely and diligently pursued issuance of a building permit during the 24-month period following the issuance of the original approval for the project;
II. Circumstances beyond the Applicants’ control have intervened and prevented the Applicants from obtaining the issuance of a building permit for the project prior to expiration of the 24-month period following the issuance of the original approval for the project; III. The application for the extension sets forth a reasonable and substantial factual basis for issuance of the time extension; IV. There is a substantial factual basis to determine that the Applicants will be able to perform the actions necessary to obtain issuance of a building permit prior to expiration of the requested extension; V. The duration of the time extension requested by the Applicants is not longer than is reasonably necessary to perform the actions necessary to obtain the issuance of a building permit;
VI. There have not been any significant changes in the general plan, applicable specific plan, if any, zoning, or character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent, incompatible, or nonconforming therewith; and VII. The granting of an extension shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

3. CONDITIONS
Resolution 2022-048
TE22-001Time Extension

Page 3 of 4 ends

Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the conditions of the original project approval of Resolution 2015-094.

4. ENFORCEMENT: Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the above-mentioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.16 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

5. EXPIRATION: The Conditional Use Permit for the project will expire 18 months from the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the Applicants have obtained building permits and have commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. No additional extensions of the application may be granted by the City Council.

6. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT: The Applicants shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicants of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, the Applicants shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicants regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Applicants shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicants.

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this Resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this Resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the Resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this Resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.
//
//
Resolution 2022-048
TE22-001Time Extension

Page 4 of 4 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 11th day of May, 2022, by the following vote:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

PERMIT FOR EMERGENCY COASTAL BLUFF REPAIRS

INCLUDING THE EXTENSION OF A BLUFF RETENTION

DEVICE AND MID-AND UPPER-BLUFF RESTORATION
BELOW 325-327 PACIFIC AVENUE IN SOLANA BEACH.

APPLICANTS: PETER LAUGHLIN AND RENITA

GREENBERG
CASE NO.: 17-18-28 CUP/DRP
WHEREAS, the Applicants Peter Laughlin and Renita Greenberg (hereinafter referred to as "Applicants") have submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Development Review Permit (DRP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Amended Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use Plan (LUP) in June 2014 with policies allowing for the construction of shoreline protective devices in the City as allowed by California Coastal Act Section 30235; and WHEREAS, an Updated Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation by Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., Project Plans and Structural Calculations and supplemental technical materials has been reviewed and confirmed by Geopacifica Geotechnical Consultants (Geopacifica), the City's third party independent geotechnical consultant, in a letter dated December 6, 2018 indicating the proposed project is required and has been designed consistent with all City requirements; and
WHEREAS, the existing static factors of safety onsite below 325 and 327 Pacific Avenue are currently 1.10 and 1.12 respectively; and
WHEREAS, a factor of safety equal to or less than 1 .2 represents a slope that is in imminent failure and the bluff top principal structures are threatened by potential bluff collapse and/or failure; and
WHEREAS, at the duly noticed public hearing held on May 22, 2019, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application as received; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found the proposed project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines § 15269 as a documented geologic emergency exists onsite; and Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP

Page 2 of 13 ends

WHEREAS, the proposed project will be designed to be located as far landward as possible, contoured, color matched and sculpted to match the surrounding bluff and will be maintained over the life of the structure consistent with the engineering design requirements depicted in Solana Beach Certified LCP LUP Appendix B, Figure 3; and WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence contained in the subject application, testimony of Geopacifica, evidence presented at the hearing and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

2. That the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to 2019 State California CEQA Guidelines 15269.

3. That the request for a Conditional Use Permit and Development Review Permit for emergency repairs to the coastal bluff will consist of the extension of the existing 15-31 foot high seawall to 35 feet, backfilling the top of the wall up to 40 feet with erodible concrete to encapsulate the clean sand lens, the import of 715 cubic yards of to reconstruct the mid-and upper-bluff with geogrid, soil nails and grade beams and to landscape the reconstructed coastal bluff below 325 and 327 Pacific Avenue is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

4. FINDINGS
A. Compliance with Solana Beach Certified LCP LUP Policy Requirements: A consistency finding with the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use Plan (LUP) is required for the proposed project. The City's LUP policies were certified to be consistent with Coastal Act Section 30235 which states:

Revetments, breakwaters, groins, harbor channels, seawalls, cliff retaining walls, and other such construction that alters natural shoreline processes shall be permitted when required to serve coastal-dependent uses or to protect existing structures or public beaches in danger from erosion, and when designed to eliminate or mitigate adverse impacts on local shoreline sand supply.

Applicable City policies from the City's Certified LUP (as amended) are listed below. The project complies or has been conditioned to comply with all applicable and relevant City LUP policies including:

Certified LUP Policy 4.26 (irrigation controls for bluff properties); Certified LUP Policy 4.27 (use of drought resistant landscaping); Certified LUP Policy 4.28 (stormwater runoff);
Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP
Page3of13 _
Certified LUP Policy 4.32 (use of preferred engineering designs); Certified LUP Policy 4.38 (aesthetics);
Certified LUP Policy 4.39 (payment of mitigation fees); Certified LUP Policy 4.45 (bluff retention device design); Certified LUP Policy 4.49 (findings);
Certified LUP Policy 4.50 (impact mitigation fees);
Certified LUP Policy 4.54 (shoreline protection device maintenance); Certified LUP Policy 4.55 (coordination among neighbors); and Certified LUP Policy 4.58 (development on the bluff).

B. Compliance with Solana Beach Municipal Code (SSMC) Findings 17.68.010 for a Conditional Use Permit:

I. That the proposed use is in accord with the general plan, the general intent of this title, and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located.

The proposed project is consistent with the required finding, whereby shoreline protective devices are a structure/use allowed in the City to protect bluff top principal structures in danger of erosion.

II. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

The proposed project is consistent with the required finding, whereby the proposed project is needed to address an emergency condition whereby bluff failure has been confirmed to be imminent by Geopacifica (City's third party geotechnical engineer).
111. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, unless a variance is granted pursuant to SBMC

17.68.020.

The proposed project is consistent with the required finding, whereby the proposed project is consistent with the zoning ordinance which allows shoreline protection.

C. Compliance with Solana Beach Municipal Code Findings 17.68.040 for a Development Review Permit:

I. The proposed development is consistent with the general plan and all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.

Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP

Page 4 of 13 ends

II. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria. a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses.
b. Building and Structure Placement.
c. Landscaping.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking, and Storage Areas. e. Grading.
f. Lighting.
g. Usable Open Space.

The proposed grading, landscaping, lighting and drainage have been conditioned to comply with the City's Certified LUP and the SBMC. The remaining development review criteria are not applicable.

Ill. All required permits and approvals issued by the city, including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

The Applicants have submitted for the CUP concurrently with the DRP.

IV. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

The project has been conditioned to require the AppHcants to obtain a Coastal Development Permit for the project prior to the issuance of a grading and construction permit.

5. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City Council on May 22, 2019 and located in the project file with a submittal date of March 13, 2019.

II. The Applicants will pay a Public Recreation Impact Mitigation (PRIM) fee in the amount of $99,900 prior to the issuance of a grading or construction permit.

Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP

Page 5 of 13 ends

Ill. The Applicants will pay a Sand Mitigation Fee in the amount of $23,977.45 prior to the issuance of a grading or construction permit.

A credit for the Sand Mitigation Fee that was paid for the lower wall through the year 2023, shall be based upon when the new construction permit is issued. If the California Coastal Commission (CCC) determines that a different amount is required for the Sand Mitigation Fee, the Applicant shall pay the fee adopted by the CCC.

IV. The Applicants shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, waiver or exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.

V. The repairs will be constructed and maintained to incorporate an earth-like appearance which will resemble, as closely as possible, the color and texture of the surrounding bluffs.

VI. The Applicants shall remove or cap any permanent irrigation system within 100 feet of the bluff edge in connection with issuance of discretionary permits for new development, redevelopment, or shoreline protection, or bluff erosion, unless the bluff property owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, or the CCC if the project is appealed, that such irrigation has no material impact on bluff erosion (e.g., watering hanging plants over hardscape which drains to the street).

VII. All storm water drain systems that currently drain or previously drained towards the west over the bluff shall be capped. These systems should be redesigned to drain directly, or through a sump system, and then pumped to the street in compliance with the current Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Standard Urban Storm water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements.

VIII. Any bluff retention device shall be reasonably maintained and repaired by the bluff property owner on an "as needed" basis, at the bluff property owner's expense, in accordance with the implementing ordinances and any permit issued by the City. Any authorized assessing entity in which the project lies shall ensure such payments are reimbursed to the City if the bluff property owner fails to perform such work and the City elects to do so, subject to mandatory reimbursement. However, in all cases, after inspection, it is apparent that repair and maintenance is necessary, including maintenance of the color of the structures to ensure a continued match with the surrounding native bluffs, the bluff property owner or assessing entity shall contact the City or CCC office to determine whether permits are necessary, and, if necessary, shall subsequently apply for a coastal development permit for the required maintenance.

Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/OAP

Page 6 of 13 ends

IX. No stockpiling of dirt or construction materials shall occur on the beach.

X. . All grading shall be properly covered and sandbags and/or ditches shall be used to prevent runoff and siltation.

XI. Measures to control erosion shall be implemented at the end of each day's work.

XII. No machinery shall be allowed in the intertidal zone at any time to the extent feasible.

XII I. All construction debris shall be properly collected and removed from the beach. Shotcrete/.concrete shall be contained through the use of tarps or similar barriers that completely enclose the application area and that prevent shotcrete/concrete contact with beach sands and/or coastal waters.

XIV. Temporary irrigation shall be periodically inspected every six months following planting to ensure planting success and to verify that irrigation is still required. At six month intervals, a report prepared by a licensed landscape architect detailing the status of the vegetation, an assessment on the condition of the temporary irrigation system, and provides supporting information on whether the temporary irrigation is still needed shall be provided to the City.

The City will issue a determination on the status of the temporary irrigation system upon reviewing the report. The City can require the removal of the temporary irrigation system at anytime. The temporary irrigation system may remain active and in place up to a maximum of 24 months at the approval of the City and must be removed once the plants have become established.

XV. All required plantings will be maintained in good growing condition throughout the life of the project and, whenever necessary, shall be replaced with new plant materials to ensure continued compliance with the landscape plan.

XVI. The temporary irrigation system shall include redundant valve control/shut off valves to prevent any irrigation system leaks/failures.

B. Engineering Department Conditions: Prior to obtaining any building or grading permits pursuant to this project, the Applicants shall:

I. Prepare, execute and record a declaration of restrictions on real property approved by the City Attorney whereby the Applicants or the Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP

Page 7 of 13 ends

Applicants' successors in interest to the property will construct and maintain the shoreline protective structure in accordance with conditions of this approval.

II. The declaration of restrictions shall include an agreement by the Applicants to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to any claim for damages from any injury to person or property caused by the shoreline defense structure or by its failure.

Ill. Said declaration of restrictions shall be acknowledged and recorded in the office of the County Recorder.

IV. Per Policy 4.49 of the certified LUP, an Encroachment Maintenance and Removal Agreement is required when the proposed Bluff Retention Device (BRO) is located in whole or in part on public land.

In order to determine if an Encroachment Removal Agreement is required for this project, submit an engineering plan clearly showing the property lines, existing topography and the location of the proposed BRO.

V. Obtain required California Coastal Commission Permits prior to the issuance of any structure and grading permits or present evidence that an emergency waiver has been granted.

VI. Obtain any other permits or emergency waivers, which may be required from State and Federal agencies including the State Lands Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

VII. The project shall be designed and shall provide appropriate data to confirm the submitted design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

This shall include, but is not limited to, a geotechnical report.

VIII. The property owners shall post securities to guarantee proper care and use of the Fletcher Cove ramp. No construction materials to be off-loaded on the ramp, at the end of the ramp or any public property including streets and Fletcher Cove Park. No washing of equipment shall occur unless a containment system is properly utilized.

IX. For all projects on which equipment is driven on the Fletcher Cove Beach Access Ramp, the access ramp and adjacent parking lot must be swept daily to remove sand that has been tracked onto the ramp and parking lot. At least once a week, the access ramp and parking lot must be swept with a street sweeper that is capable of cleaning the streets and parking lots of paper, glass, dirt, silt, sand, rocks, litter and miscellaneous debris. The street sweeper shall be Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP

Page 8 of 13 ends

equipped with dual gutter brooms and vacuum equipment may be used. If any sand is tracked outside the parking lot, these areas (including city streets) must also be cleaned weekly with a street sweeper.

X. The property owners shall pay all inspection and plan check fees as required by the City.

XI. Plans and specifications for the project shall be approved by the City Engineer in addition to approvals from the Director of Planning as may be required, and shall substantially conform to the plans submitted by the Applicants. All bluff stabilization devices shall produce a natural appearing bluff to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. Project implementation shall provide a final product mimicking a naturally appearing bluff in terms of colors, textures, forms and angles.

XI I. A grading/drainage plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with the current Grading Ordinance and be submitted to the City Engineer for approval and permit issuance.

XIII. The Applicants shall post with the City a performance bond equal to the full amount of the work to be completed to guarantee that once started, the construction will be completed per approved plans.

XIV. The Applicants or contractor hired by the Applicants shall submit a Certificate of Insurance naming the City of Solana Beach as an additional insured in the amount of $2,000,000 on a policy of general liability insurance issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in California, and meeting the requirements established by City Council resolution for insurance companies doing business with the City, covering injuries to persons and property during the construction period.

XV. The Applicants shall obtain a Special Use (Marine Safety) Permit specifying the conditions governing use of vehicles, use of the beach access ramp, and entry upon and use of areas of the public beach for construction equipment and vehicles. Evidence of permit issuance shall be submitted to the City Engineer before issuance of the permit for the project.

XVI. The Applicants shall have on file evidence from the Captain of Marine Safety and City Engineer, that arrangements have been made to satisfy the following criteria:
·a. Prior to usage of the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove ramp or parking lot, a cash deposit, bond or other secured agreement to cover the following impact charges shall be deposited:

Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP

Page 9 of 13 ends

i. A five-dollar and thirty-cents ($5.30) per round trip vehicle charge for all construction related vehicles using the ramp. ii. A two-dollar and seventy cents ($2.70) per ton fee, or less if approved by the City Council, based on the estimated weight of the vehicle and load for all vehicles in excess of¾ ton capacity, excluding any vehicles solely transporting beach grade
replenishment sand.
iii. A twenty-seven dollar ($27) per day charge for the first 30 days escalating to fifty-three dollars ($53) per day for the 31 st and subsequent days charge shall be collected to encourage a timely completion of all projects, unless otherwise modified for good cause by the City Council or City Manager.
iv. Any damage caused to the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove ramp and parking lot.
b. At least one City of Solana Beach Lifeguard shall be contracted, at the Applicants' expense, through the Captain of Marine Safety, to monitor all activities in order to insure full compliance with the conditions of this permit. The lifeguard(s) shall be on duty at all times when any construction activity takes place. Additional lifeguards may be required at the discretion of the Captain of Marine Safety. In addition to the lifeguard staffing cost, the Applicants shall also pay a Marine Safety equipment use fee of four-dollar and sixty-four cents ($4.64) per hour, based on the number of hours the lifeguards are contracted for the project. c. If construction access is from Fletcher Cove Park, precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to the beach access ramp during construction and repairs. If damage to the ramp occurs, it shall be repaired to a condition equivalent to the condition at the start of construction activity to the satisfaction of the City of Solana Beach City Engineer. All City owned work areas including Fletcher Cove Park and access ramp shall be videotaped prior to the
commencement of the project. The videotape shall establish the "as-is" condition. In any areas missed by the videotape, the City Engineer will determine "as-is" condition.

If access is from the State Park at the north end of Solana Beach, precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to the hard layer of fossiliferous sandstone that forms the beach surface at the north end of the coastal bluffs. Such access may necessitate State approval. Proof of such access shall be provided to the City Engineer before construction begins.

Resolution 2019-07 4
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP

Page 10 of 13 ends

XVII. Beach quality sand from the excavation for the proposed project shall be deposited and spread on the beach in front of this site unless unique and/or inappropriate conditions are encountered. The Applicants should reference this condition to other permitting agencies.

XVIII. An encroachment permit from the Engineering Department is required if a crane, construction materials, etc. are envisioned to be stationed in the public right of way. The City does not guarantee that an encroachment permit will be approved.

XIX. Any grout mixture used on the project that may be visible from the beach or surrounding areas shall be of similar color as the surrounding natural bluffs. Color samples shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to placing the grout.

XX. The structure and any exposed construction shall mimic the natural contours, color and texture to the maximum extent practicable, as determined by the City Engineer and Community Development Director.

XXI. A carved, colored and textured facade on the face of the structure matching the adjacent bluff areas shall be constructed. The fagade shall match the contours, both vertically and horizontally, and the texture of the adjacent natural bluffs to the maximum extent feasible.

Coastal bluff colored grouting shall be used and shall be submitted to the City Engineer before approval of the plans. A test prism shall be cast and delivered to a testing lab during construction.

XXII. A qualified, licensed and insured contractor shall perform all required work as outlined by certified/registered engineering geologist or Registered Civil Engineer on the construction plans. Special and general notes on said plans shall be followed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or his designee.

XXIII. Lateral pedestrian and Marine Safety vehicular access through the construction area, shall be provided past the site at all times, subject to high tides and safety issues. A 30-foot wide safety/construction work zone shall be provided during work hours to separate the work zone from the open public beach.

XXIV. No construction activities may occur on the beach during the busier recreational season, which is defined as the period between Memorial Day and Labor Day of any year. The contractor shall obtain approval from the City of Solana Beach Engineering and Marine Safety Departments regarding the use and timing of the Fletcher Cove parking lot and beach access ramp for all construction related access, staging and parking issues if such use becomes required.

Resolution 2019-074
325 and 327 Pacific Ave. CUP/DRP

Page 11 of 13 ends

Solana Beach City CouncilMay 11, 2022

Solana Beach City Council
May 11, 2022