Solana Beach City Council
April 12, 2023

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 12, 2023 Page 1 of 7 AGENDA
Joint REGULAR Meeting
Wednesday, April 12, 2023 * 6:00 p.m.

City Hall / Council Chambers, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California  City Council meetings are video recorded and archived as a permanent record. The video recording captures the complete proceedings of the meeting and is available for viewing on the City's website.  Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time prior to meetings for processing new submittals. Complete records containing meeting handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request.

PUBLIC MEETING ACCESS
The Regular Meetings of the City Council are scheduled for the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays and are broadcast live. The video taping of meetings are maintained as a permanent record and contain a detailed account of the proceedings. Council meeting tapings are archived and available for viewing on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

WATCH THE MEETING
• Live web-streaming: Meetings web-stream live on the City’s website on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

Find the large Live Meeting button.
• Live Broadcast on Local Govt. Channel: Meetings are broadcast live on Cox Communications - Channel 19 / Spectrum (Time Warner)-Channel 24 / AT&T U-verse Channel 99. • Archived videos online: The video taping of meetings are maintained as a permanent record and contain a detailed account of the proceedings. Council meeting tapings are archived and available for viewing on the City’s Public Meetings webpage.

AGENDA MATERIALS
A full City Council agenda packet including relative supporting documentation is available at City Hall, the Solana Beach Branch Library (157 Stevens Ave.), La Colonia Community Ctr., and online www.cityofsolanabeach.org. Agendas are posted at least 72 hours prior to regular meetings and at least 24 hours prior to special meetings. Writings and documents regarding an agenda of an open session meeting, received after the official posting, and distributed to the Council for consideration, will be made available for public viewing at the same time. In addition, items received at least 1 hour 30 minutes prior to the meeting time will be uploaded online with the agenda posting. Materials submitted for consideration should be forwarded to the City Clerk’s Department 858-720-2400. The designated location for viewing of hard copies is the City Clerk’s office at City Hall during normal business hours.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Written correspondence (supplemental items) regarding an agenda item at an open session meeting should be submitted to the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] with a) Subject line to include the meeting date b) Include the Agenda Item # as listed on the Agenda. o Correspondence received after the official posting of the agenda, but two hours prior to the meeting start time, on the meeting day, will be distributed to Council and made available online along with the agenda posting. All submittals received before the start of the meeting will be made part of the record. o Written submittals will be added to the record and not read out loud.

And/Or
Verbal Comment Participation:

Please submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk prior to the meeting, or the announcement of the Section/Item, to provide public comment. Allotted times for speaking are outlined on the speaker’s slip for each agenda section: Oral Communications, Consent, Public Hearings and Staff Reports.

Public speakers have 3 minutes each to speak on each topic. Time may be donated by another individual

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

SOLANA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, & HOUSING AUTHORITY
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 12, 2023 Page 2 of 7 who is present at the meeting to allow an individual up to 6 minutes to speak. Group: Time may be donated by two individuals who are present at the meeting allowing an individual up to 10 minutes to speak. Group Hearings: For public hearings only, time may be donated by two individuals who are present at the meeting allowing an individual up to 15 minutes to speak.

SPECIAL ASSISTANCE NEEDED
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons with a disability may request an agenda in appropriate alternative formats as required by Section 202. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s office (858) 720-2400 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

As a courtesy to all meeting attendees, please set all electronic devices to silent mode and engage in conversations outside the Council Chambers.

CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
Lesa Heebner
Mayor
David A. Zito
Deputy Mayor / Councilmember District 1
Jewel Edson
Councilmember District 3
Kristi Becker
Councilmember District 2
Jill MacDonald
Councilmember District 4
Gregory Wade
City Manager
Johanna Canlas
City Attorney
Angela Ivey
City Clerk
SPEAKERS:

Please submit your speaker slip to the City Clerk prior to the meeting or the announcement of the Item. Allotted times for speaking are outlined on the speaker’s slip for Oral Communications, Consent, Public Hearings and Staff Reports.

READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS:

Pursuant to Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 2.04.460, at the time of introduction or adoption of an ordinance or adoption of a resolution, the same shall not be read in full unless after the reading of the title, further reading is requested by a member of the Council. If any Councilmember so requests, the ordinance or resolution shall be read in full. In the absence of such a request, this section shall constitute a waiver by the council of such reading.

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:

CLOSED SESSION REPORT:

FLAG SALUTE:

APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

PROCLAMATIONS/CERTIFICATES: Ceremonial
None at the posting of this agenda
PRESENTATIONS: Ceremonial items that do not contain in-depth discussion and no action/direction.

None at the posting of this agenda
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 12, 2023 Page 3 of 7 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

Comments relating to items on this evening’s agenda are taken at the time the items are heard. This portion of the agenda provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items relating to City business and not appearing on today’s agenda by submitting a speaker slip (located on the back table) to the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action shall be taken by the City Council on public comment items. Council may refer items to the City Manager for placement on a future agenda. The maximum time allotted for each presentation is THREE MINUTES. No donations of time are permitted (SBMC 2.04.190). Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

COUNCIL COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENTARY:

An opportunity for City Council to make brief announcements or report on their activities. These items are not agendized for official City business with no action or substantive discussion.

A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Action Items) (A.1. - A.7.)
Items listed on the Consent Calendar are to be acted in a single action of the City Council unless pulled for discussion. Any member of the public may address the City Council on an item of concern by submitting to the City Clerk a speaker slip (located on the back table) before the Consent Calendar is addressed. Those items removed from the Consent Calendar by a member of the Council will be trailed to the end of the agenda, while Consent Calendar items removed by the public will be heard immediately after approval of the Consent Calendar to hear the public speaker.

All speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for details.

Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

A.1. Minutes of the City Council.

Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Approve the Minutes of the City Council meetings held on March 08, 2023.

Item A.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.2. Register Of Demands. (File 0300-30)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Ratify the list of demands for March 04, 2023 – March 24, 2023.

Item A.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.3. General Fund Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Changes. (File 0330-30) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Receive the report listing changes made to the Fiscal Year 2022/2023 General Fund Adopted Budget.

Item A.3. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 12, 2023 Page 4 of 7 A.4. Animal Control Services Contract. (File 0200-10)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adoption of Resolution 2023-045 authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with San Diego Humane Society for the delivery of Animal Control Services for the City of Solana Beach.

Item A.4. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.5. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Cooperative Agreement Extension. (File 0390-32) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-040 authorizing the automatic renewal of the Community Development Block Grant Cooperation Agreement for the qualification periods of July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025; July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026; and July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027.

Item A.5. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.6. Principal Management Analyst Position. (File 0510-10) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-044 approving the creation of the Principal Management Analyst position at pay grade M-4 of the Management Salary Schedule 1.

2. Approve a FY 2022/2023 appropriation of $20,000 to the General Fund and $2,000 to non-General Fund funds allocated between salary and benefits as determined by the Finance Department.

3. Authorize the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2022/2023 Adopted Budget accordingly.

Item A.6. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

A.7. Building Permit Review and Inspection Services. (File 0800-20) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-046 authorizing the City Manager to increase the Estimated Building Permit Revenue by $220,000 from $305,000 to $525,000 and increase Professional Services Budget in the Community Development Department Building Services by $200,000 from $391,250 to $591,250.

Item A.7. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 12, 2023 Page 5 of 7 NOTE: The City Council shall not begin a new agenda item after 10:30 p.m. unless approved by a unanimous vote of all members present. (SBMC 2.04.070) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (B.1.)
This portion of the agenda provides citizens an opportunity to express their views on a specific issue as required by law after proper noticing by submitting a speaker slip (located on the back table) to the City Clerk. After considering all of the evidence, including written materials and oral testimony, the City Council must make a decision supported by findings and the findings must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. An applicant or designee(s) for a private development/business project, for which the public hearing is being held, is allotted a total of fifteen minutes to speak, as per SBMC 2.04.210. A portion of the fifteen minutes may be saved to respond to those who speak in opposition. All other speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for time allotment. Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

B.1. Public Hearing: 241 Pacific Ave., Applicant: Richard Schrager, Case: DRP 22- 014. (File 0600-40)
The proposed project meets the minimum objective requirements under the LUP, SBMC, is consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP.

Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2023-033 conditionally approving an interior remodel to an existing multilevel, single family residence as well as the relocation of two exterior staircases and the construction of a covered porch area at 241 Pacific Avenue.

Item B.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals. The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

C. STAFF REPORTS: (C.1. – C.2.)
Submit speaker slips to the City Clerk.

All speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for time allotments. Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

C.1. Quarterly Investment Report. (File 0350-44)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Accept and file the Cash and Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2022.

Item C.1. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 12, 2023 Page 6 of 7 C.2. Street Maintenance and Repairs Project – Fiscal Year 2022/23. (File 0820-35) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-041:
a. Approving the list of streets scheduled for maintenance and repairs as part of the 2022/23 Street Maintenance and Repairs Project.
b. Authorizing the City Engineer to advertise for construction bids for the 2022/23 Street Maintenance and Repairs Project.

Item C.2. Report (click here)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

WORK PLAN COMMENTS:

Adopted June 22, 2022
COMPENSATION & REIMBURSEMENT DISCLOSURE:

GC: Article 2.3. Compensation: 53232.3. (a) Reimbursable expenses shall include, but not be limited to, meals, lodging, and travel. 53232.3 (d) Members of a legislative body shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency “City” at the next regular meeting of the legislative body.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS: Council Committees
REGIONAL COMMITTEES: (outside agencies, appointed by this Council) a. City Selection Committee (meets twice a year) Primary-Heebner, Alternate-Edson b. Clean Energy Alliance (CEA) JPA: Primary-Becker, Alternate-Zito c. County Service Area 17: Primary-MacDonald, Alternate-Edson d. Escondido Creek Watershed Authority: Becker / Staff (no alternate). e. League of Ca. Cities’ San Diego County Executive Committee: Primary-MacDonald, Alternate-Becker. Subcommittees determined by its members. f. League of Ca. Cities’ Local Legislative Committee: Primary-MacDonald, Alternate-Becker g. League of Ca. Cities’ Coastal Cities Issues Group (CCIG): Primary-MacDonald, Alternate-Becker
h. North County Dispatch JPA: Primary-MacDonald, Alternate-Becker i. North County Transit District: Primary-Edson, Alternate-MacDonald j. Regional Solid Waste Association (RSWA): Primary-Zito, Alternate-MacDonald k. SANDAG: Primary-Heebner, 1st Alternate-Zito, 2nd Alternate-Edson. Subcommittees determined by its members.
l. SANDAG Shoreline Preservation Committee: Primary-Becker, Alternate-Zito m. San Dieguito River Valley JPA: Primary-MacDonald, Alternate-Becker n. San Elijo JPA: Primary-Zito, Primary-Becker, Alternate-City Manager o. 22nd Agricultural District Association Community Relations Committee: Primary-Edson, Primary-Heebner
STANDING COMMITTEES: (All Primary Members) (Permanent Committees) a. Business Liaison Committee – Zito, Edson
b. Fire Dept. Management Governance & Organizational Evaluation – Edson, MacDonald c. Highway 101 / Cedros Ave. Development Committee – Heebner, Edson d. Parks and Recreation Committee – Zito, Becker
e. Public Arts Committee – Edson, Heebner
f. School Relations Committee – Becker, MacDonald
g. Solana Beach-Del Mar Relations Committee – Heebner, Edson

CITIZEN COMMISSION(S)
a. Climate Action Commission – Zito, Becker
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Agenda April 12, 2023 Page 7 of 7 ADJOURN:

Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting is April 26, 2023
Always refer to the City’s website Event Calendar for an updated schedule or contact City Hall. www.cityofsolanabeach.org 858-720-2400

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
§
I, Angela Ivey, City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach, do hereby certify that this Agenda for the April 12, 2023 Council Meeting was called by City Council, Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, Public Financing Authority, and the Housing Authority of the City of Solana Beach, California, was provided and posted on April 5, 2023 at 3:20 p.m. on the City Bulletin Board at the entrance to the City Council Chambers. Said meeting is held at 6:00 p.m., April 12, 2023, in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California.

Angela Ivey, City Clerk
City of Solana Beach, CA
UPCOMING CITIZEN CITY COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS:

Regularly Scheduled, or Special Meetings that have been announced, are posted on each Citizen Commission’s Agenda webpage. See the Citizen Commission’s Agenda webpages or the City’s Events Calendar for updates. o Budget & Finance Commission
o Climate Action Commission
o Parks & Recreation Commission
o Public Arts Commission
o View Assessment Commission
}

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

SOLANA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY

MINUTES
Joint Meeting - Closed Session
Wednesday, March 08, 2023 at 5:00 p.m.

City Hall / Council Chambers, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California Minutes contain a summary of significant discussions and formal actions taken at a City Council meeting.

CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
Lesa Heebner
Mayor
David A. Zito
Deputy Mayor/
Councilmember
District 1
Jewel Edson
Councilmember
District 3
Kristi Becker
Councilmember
District 2
Jill MacDonald
Councilmember
District 4
Gregory Wade
City Manager
Johanna Canlas
City Attorney
Angela Ivey
City Clerk
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:

Mayor Heebner called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (ONLY): None
Report to Council Chambers and submit speaker slips to the City Clerk before the meeting recesses to closed session
CLOSED SESSION:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Two (2) Potential cases
No reportable action.

ADJOURN:

Mayor Heebner adjourned the meeting at 5:33 p.m.

Present: Lesa Heebner, David A. Zito, Jewel Edson, Kristi Becker, Jill MacDonald

Absent: None
Also

Present:

Gregory Wade, City Manager
Elizabeth Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney
Agenda Item A.1.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 08, 2023 Page 1 of 6

MINUTES
Joint REGULAR Meeting
Wednesday, March 08, 2023 * 6:00 p.m.

City Hall / Council Chambers, 635 S. Highway 101, Solana Beach, California Minutes contain a summary of significant discussions and formal actions taken at a City Council meeting.  City Council meetings are video recorded and archived as a permanent record. The video recording captures the complete proceedings of the meeting and is available for viewing on the City's website.  Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time prior to meetings for processing new submittals. Complete records containing meeting handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request.

CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
Lesa Heebner
Mayor
David A. Zito
Councilmember District 1
Jewel Edson
Councilmember District 3
Kristi Becker
Councilmember District 2
Jill MacDonald
Councilmember District 4
Gregory Wade
City Manager
Johanna Canlas
City Attorney
Angela Ivey
City Clerk
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:

Mayor Heebner called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

Present: Lesa Heebner, David A. Zito, Jewel Edson, Kristi Becker, Jill MacDonald

Absent: None
Also

Present:

Greg Wade, City Manager
Johanna Canlas, City Attorney
Angela Ivey, City Clerk
Dan King, Assistant City Manager
Mo Sammak, City Engineer/Public Works Dir.

Rod Greek, Interim Finance Dir.

Joseph Lim, Community Development Dir.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT: None
FLAG SALUTE:

APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

Motion: Moved by Deputy Mayor Zito and second by Councilmember Becker to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

SOLANA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, & HOUSING AUTHORITY
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 08, 2023 Page 2 of 6 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
Comments relating to items on this evening’s agenda are taken at the time the items are heard. This portion of the agenda provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items relating to City business and not appearing on today’s agenda by submitting a speaker slip (located on the back table) to the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action shall be taken by the City Council on public comment items. Council may refer items to the City Manager for placement on a future agenda. The maximum time allotted for each presentation is THREE MINUTES. No donations of time are permitted (SBMC 2.04.190). Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

COUNCIL COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENTARY:

An opportunity for City Council to make brief announcements or report on their activities. These items are not agendized for official City business with no action or substantive discussion.

A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Action Items) (A.1. - A.8.)
Items listed on the Consent Calendar are to be acted in a single action of the City Council unless pulled for discussion. Any member of the public may address the City Council on an item of concern by submitting to the City Clerk a speaker slip (located on the back table) before the Consent Calendar is addressed. Those items removed from the Consent Calendar by a member of the Council will be trailed to the end of the agenda, while Consent Calendar items removed by the public will be heard immediately after approval of the Consent Calendar to hear the public speaker.

All speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for details.

Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

A.1. Minutes of the City Council.

Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Approve the Minutes of the City Council meetings held on February 08, 2023.

Approved Minutes https://www.cityofsolanabeach.org/en/government/public-meetings/agendas-minutes-videos Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Deputy Mayor Zito to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.2. Register Of Demands. (File 0300-30)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Ratify the list of demands for February 11, 2023 – February 24, 2023.

Item A.2. Report (click here) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Deputy Mayor Zito to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.3. General Fund Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Changes. (File 0330-30) Recommendation: That the City Council
Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 08, 2023 Page 3 of 6

1. Receive the report listing changes made to the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 General Fund Adopted Budget.

Item A.3. Report (click here) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Deputy Mayor Zito to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.5. Sales, Transaction, and Use Tax Audit Services. (File 0390-05) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-027:
a. Authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional services Agreement with Hinderliter de Llamas and Associates, in an amount not to exceed $45,000, for Sales, Transaction and Use Tax Audit Services for Fiscal Year 2022/23 which increases the total authorized contract from $100,000 to $125,000.
b. Appropriating $25,000 from the General Fund – Undesignated Reserves to the Professional Services Agreement with Sales, Transaction and Use Tax Audit Services for Fiscal Year 2022/23.
c. Authorizing the City Treasurer to amend the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Adopted Budget accordingly.

Item A.5. Report (click here) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Deputy Mayor Zito to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.6. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 50-Year Project. (File 0740-80) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-028:
a. The City Manager, or his designee, to request and accept payment of all grant funding successfully obtained from the State of California Department of Parks for ultimate pass-through to the USACE as part of the local cost share match. b. The City Manager, or his designee, to pay the invoice from the USACE dated January 26, 2023 for the incremental non-Federal cash contribution from the City of Solana Beach for Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 for the amount of $1,359,706.00, no later than March 10, 2023, to support initial construction of the Project.
c. The use of Sand Replenishment/Coastal Access Funds (Capital Project Fund450) in the amount of $300,000.00 and $313,556.00 of General Fund Reserves for payment of the $1,359,706.00 to support initial construction of the Project.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 08, 2023 Page 4 of 6 d. The use of Sand Mitigation and Public Recreation Impact Mitigation funds or newly secured Grant Funds to reimburse $313,556.00 to the General Fund when such funding is available.
e. The City Manager, or his designee, to pay the invoice from the USACE dated January 26, 2023 for the incremental non-Federal cash contribution from the City of Solana Beach for Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 for the amount of $7,705,000 via California State Parks, Division of Boating and Waterways, to support initial construction of the Project.
f. The City Manager to act on behalf of the City of Solana Beach, in consultation with the City Attorney, to negotiate and execute all agreements and amendments and to pay any anticipated local cost share requirements related to the USACE Project on behalf of the City.

Item A.6. Report (click here)
Item A.6. Updated Report #1 (added 3-8-23 at 11am)
Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Deputy Mayor Zito to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.7. City’s Housing and Safety Element Update. (File 0610-10) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-030 authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment #4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. increasing the contract amount by $15,000 for an amount not to exceed $171,200.

Item A.7. Report (click here) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Deputy Mayor Zito to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

A.8. Terminating the Proclamation of the Existence of a Local Emergency. (File 0240-25)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-029 terminating the Proclamation of the Existence of a Local Emergency due to COVID-19.

Item A.8. Report (click here) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Deputy Mayor Zito to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 08, 2023 Page 5 of 6 C. STAFF REPORTS: (C.1. – C.2.)
Submit speaker slips to the City Clerk.

All speakers should refer to the public comment section at the beginning of the agenda for time allotments. Please be aware of the timer light on the Council Dais.

C.1. Santa Fe Christian Schools Alternative Story Pole Plan - Field Lighting. (File 0400-40) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Consider approving the Santa Fe Christian Schools alternative story pole plan and if the City Council approves the requested alternative, adopt Resolution 2023-032.

Item C.1. Report (click here) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Joe Lim, Community Development Director, presented a PowerPoint (on file).

Council, Staff, and Applicant representatives, Keith Francis and Kurt de Pfyffer, discussed that the lighting chosen was the best lighting without light spillage with the fewest number of poles, the balloon height option due to the height, they will have to be refilled over time with helium, the City’s helium balloon ban, increasing the noticing radius due to the height and potential impact, they took drone footage of the campus to produce a rendering to scale with various viewpoints, providing the elevations that reflect the heights in relation to the campus buildings.

Motion: Moved by Mayor Heebner and second by Deputy Mayor Zito to approve and adding a 1,000 sq. ft. noticing radius, 30 full days of balloon height, noticed on the website for inquiries, returning to Council providing views from various vantage points and site elevations in relation to other buildings on campus, and that Staff monitor wind gust level that would require the balloons to be lowered. Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

C.2. Re-adopt (2nd Reading) Ordinance 529 – Buildings Standards Code Amendments. (File 0600-05)
Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Re-adopt Ordinance 529 (2nd Reading) amending Title 15 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code.

Item C.2. Report (click here) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Elizabeth Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney, read the title of the ordinance.

Motion: Moved by Councilmember Edson and second by Councilmember Becker to approve.

Approved 5/0. Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

Solana Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 08, 2023 Page 6 of 6 A.4. Community Grant Program - Fiscal Year 2023-24. (File 0330-25) Recommendation: That the City Council

1. Approve Resolution 2023-031 authorizing the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Community Grant Program.

Item A.4. Report (click here) Posted Reports & Supplemental Docs contain records up to the cut off time, prior to the start of the meeting, for processing new submittals.

The final official record containing handouts, PowerPoints, etc. can be obtained through a Records Request to the City Clerk’s Office.

Motion: Moved Deputy Mayor Zito and second by Councilmember Edson to approve and increase the City’s portion of the grant allocation contribution to $20,000. Approved 5/0.

Ayes: Heebner, Zito, Edson, Becker, MacDonald. Noes: None. Motion carried unanimously.

WORK PLAN COMMENTS: None
Adopted June 22, 2022
COMPENSATION & REIMBURSEMENT DISCLOSURE: None
GC: Article 2.3. Compensation: 53232.3. (a) Reimbursable expenses shall include, but not be limited to, meals, lodging, and travel. 53232.3 (d) Members of a legislative body shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency “City” at the next regular meeting of the legislative body.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS: Council Committees
REGIONAL COMMITTEES: (outside agencies, appointed by this Council) STANDING COMMITTEES: (All Primary Members) (Permanent Committees)

CITIZEN COMMISSION(S)
ADJOURN:

Mayor Heebner adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. in memory of Gordon Johns having recently passed away.

CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.2.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance
SUBJECT: Register of Demands
BACKGROUND:

Section 3.04.020 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code requires that the City Council ratify a register of demands which represents all financial demands made upon the City for the applicable period.

DISCUSSION:

Staff certifies that the register of demands has been reviewed for accuracy, that funds are available to pay the above demands, and that the demands comply with the adopted budget.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The register of demands for March 4, 2023 through March 24, 2023 reflects total expenditures of $3,456,241.69 from various City sources.

WORK PLAN:

N/A
Register of Demands - 03/04/23 through 03/24/23
Check Register-Disbursement Fund (Attachment 1) $ 3,152,690.81 Net Payroll Retiree Health March 8, 2023 3,721.00
Net Payroll Council March 9, 2023 5,154.32
Net Payroll Staff N19 March 17, 2023 294,675.56
TOTAL $ 3,456,241.69
April 12, 2023
Register of Demands

OPTIONS:
• Ratify the register of demands.
• Do not ratify and provide direction.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the above register of demands.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Check Register – Disbursement Fund
Page: 1 of 11
City of Solana Beach
Register of Demands
3/4/2023 - 3/24/2023
Department
Vendor Description Date
Check/EFT
Number Amount
100 - GENERAL FUND
MISSION SQUARE PLAN 302817 Payroll Run 2 - Warrant NC09 03/09/2023 9000723 $4,812.03 MISSION SQUARE PLAN 302817 Payroll Run 1 - Warrant N19 03/16/2023 9000730 $19,461.47 SOLANA BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC Payroll Run 1 - Warrant N19 03/16/2023 9000732 $850.00 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 2022 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE PAYMENT-FINAL 03/09/2023 103455 $421.74 AFLAC FEBRUARY 23 03/16/2023 103485 $789.70
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. JAN 23-Sheriff Law Enforcement 03/09/2023 103470 $434.84 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. JAN 23- CR TOW FEE 03/09/2023 103470 ($328.26) MISSION SQUARE RHS 801939 Payroll Run 1 - Warrant N19 03/16/2023 9000731 $2,110.96 MUNICIPAL MANAGEMT ASSOC OF SC MAR 23-24-MEMBERSHIP 03/23/2023 103534 $60.00 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL DEC 22 LIFE & ADD INS 03/16/2023 9000734 $1,405.07 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL DEC 22 SUPP LIFE INS 03/16/2023 9000734 $341.80 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL DEC 22 LTD 03/16/2023 9000734 $1,735.45 DANNY HERNANDEZ REISSUE VOUCHER RETURN-243358 03/06/2023 103443 $2,188.84 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. N18 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/09/2023 9000727 $1,442.90 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. N18 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/09/2023 9000727 $611.66 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. NC09 FSA FUNDING 03/16/2023 9000733 $216.67 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. N12 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/23/2023 9000738 $1,302.08 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. N12 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/23/2023 9000738 $439.77 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. NC6 FSA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/23/2023 9000738 $237.50 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. N19 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/23/2023 9000738 $1,443.32 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. N19 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/23/2023 9000738 $611.78 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. N13 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/23/2023 9000738 $1,302.08 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. N13 FSA/DCA CONTRIBUTIONS 03/23/2023 9000738 $439.77 SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY MAR 23-DENTAL 03/16/2023 9000729 $2,829.20 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Run 1 - Warrant N19 03/16/2023 103495 $100.00 INSTATAX NC09 TAX PAYMENT 03/09/2023 990120222 $101.61
INSTATAX NC09 TAX PAYMENT 03/09/2023 990120222 $284.88
INSTATAX NC09 TAX PAYMENT 03/09/2023 990120222 $50.00
INSTATAX N19 Tax Payment 03/17/2023 990120225 $16,164.79 INSTATAX N19 Tax Payment 03/17/2023 990120225 $2,229.72 INSTATAX N19 Tax Payment 03/17/2023 990120225 $41,186.18 INSTATAX N19 Tax Payment 03/17/2023 990120225 $1,333.48 INSTATAX N19 Tax Payment 03/17/2023 990120225 $8,877.82 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FEB 23 VISION 03/16/2023 103494 $517.28 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MARCH 23 VISION 03/16/2023 103494 $496.95 SEBOLD 1998 TRUST RFND-FCCC - 01/28/23 03/09/2023 103474 $500.00 MARCUS YCO RFND-03/04/23-FCCC 03/23/2023 103533 $500.00 PENELOPE QUINTANA RFND-03/05/23-FCCC 03/23/2023 103538 $500.00 THAOLY NGUYEN RFND-BC FIRE INSPECTION FEE 03/23/2023 103527 $106.00 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $118,109.08
1005100 - CITY COUNCIL
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES INC 2023-MEMBERSHIP DUES/LUNCHEON MEETINGS 03/09/2023 103460 $900.00 Attachment 1
Page: 2 of 11
US BANK COUNCIL MEETING 03/23/2023 103518 $161.13
US BANK NEW COUNCIL MEMB CONFERENCE 03/23/2023 103518 $1,180.84 US BANK COUNCIL DINNER 03/09/2023 103448 $222.22
TOTAL CITY COUNCIL $2,464.19
1005150 - CITY CLERK
PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SVC 29312709-CITY WIDE POSTAGE REFILL 03/16/2023 103500 $2,000.00 STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL KLEENEX/FACIAL TISSUE 03/09/2023 103476 $32.83 STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL POSTITS/BINDER CLIPS/LETTER OPENER/SCISSORS 03/09/2023 103476 $70.09 STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL FILE POCKETS 03/09/2023 103476 $68.92 STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL STAPLES 03/09/2023 103476 $12.49 STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL FILE CABINET 03/09/2023 103476 $461.16 US BANK MINTUES TRANSCRIPTION 03/23/2023 103518 $40.50
US BANK COUNCIL NAME BADGE 03/23/2023 103518 $17.74
US BANK COUNCIL NAME BADGES 03/23/2023 103518 $58.95
US BANK MINTUES TRANSCRIPTION 03/23/2023 103518 $36.25
US BANK TIME STAMP REPAIR 03/23/2023 103518 $171.94
US BANK UPS SHIPPING CHARGE 03/23/2023 103518 $17.30
US BANK UPS SHIPPING CHARGE 03/23/2023 103518 $13.00
US BANK RECYCLING BIN WITH LID 03/23/2023 103518 $30.23 US BANK RECYCLING BINS WITH LID 03/23/2023 103518 $74.28 US BANK POOL NOODLES 03/23/2023 103518 $53.44
US BANK COUNCIL BADGE HOLDER 03/23/2023 103518 $8.61
US BANK COUNCIL BADGE HOLDERS 03/23/2023 103518 $34.44
US BANK ANNUAL PAPER SUBSCRIPTION 03/23/2023 103518 $465.39 US BANK DOCUMENT CABINET 03/09/2023 103448 $461.16
US BANK COUNCIL TRANSCRIPT 03/09/2023 103448 $58.75
US BANK POOL NOODLES 03/09/2023 103448 $30.26
UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY ORD 529-ADOPT 03/16/2023 103510 $89.35 UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY ORD INTRO- 529 03/16/2023 103510 $89.35 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT, INC FEB 23-STORAGE, SHREDDING 03/16/2023 103490 $841.14 TOTAL CITY CLERK $5,237.57
1005200 - CITY MANAGER
US BANK EE CARDS 03/23/2023 103518 $49.06
US BANK CM ANNUAL CONFERENCE 03/23/2023 103518 $270.43
US BANK HEEBNER FLOWERS 03/09/2023 103448 $32.31
US BANK LA TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 03/09/2023 103448 $51.87
TOTAL CITY MANAGER $403.67
1005250 - LEGAL SERVICES
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0001-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $4,678.20 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0001.002-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $1,511.10 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0002-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $785.40 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0040.002-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $2,520.80 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN RETAIN-JANUARY 23 03/16/2023 103487 $11,644.00 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0006-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $1,428.00 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0007-JAN 23-CLM.GENR 03/16/2023 103487 $1,055.70 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0014-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $1,962.80 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0019-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $848.70 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0038-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $3,284.40 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0040-JAN 23 03/16/2023 103487 $4,384.00 TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES $34,103.10
1005300 - FINANCE
Page: 3 of 11
STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL MOUSE PAD 03/16/2023 103506 $12.92 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS INC FY 22-ACFR DEBT STMNT 03/09/2023 103449 $550.00 US BANK BC SPANISH TRANSLATION 03/09/2023 103448 $165.20 KFORCE INC. 02/23/23-TEMP SERVICES-FIN 03/09/2023 9000724 $960.00 HR DIRECT 1095 C KIT 03/23/2023 103525 $223.02
AMAZON.COM SALES, INC CALCULATOR RIBBON 03/09/2023 103445 $13.98 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC TONER-FIN 03/23/2023 103515 $64.64 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC COFFEE PODS/CLIP BOARDS 03/23/2023 103515 $15.03 TOTAL FINANCE $2,004.79
1005350 - SUPPORT SERVICES
STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL KLEENEX/PENS/SOAP/NOTE PADS 03/16/2023 103506 $122.94 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-XEROX-CLERK 03/16/2023 103512 $157.67 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-XEROX-CLERK 03/16/2023 103512 $271.68 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-XEROX-PLN/ENG 03/16/2023 103512 $113.93 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-XEROX-PLN/ENG 03/16/2023 103512 $546.78 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-XEROX-UPSTAIRS 03/16/2023 103512 $154.36 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-XEROX-UPSTAIRS 03/16/2023 103512 $298.25 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-FIERY-PLN/ENG 03/16/2023 103512 $132.61 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-FIERY-UPSTAIRS 03/16/2023 103512 $132.61 XEROX CORPORATION FEB 23-FIERY-CLERK 03/16/2023 103512 $122.84 READY REFRESH BY NESTLE FEB 23-DRINKING WATER-CH 03/16/2023 103502 $332.00 READY REFRESH BY NESTLE FEB 23-DRINKING WATER-PW 03/16/2023 103502 $71.65 READY REFRESH BY NESTLE FEB 23-DRINKING WATER-LC 03/16/2023 103502 $47.60 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC SHREDDER LUBE/SHREDDER BAGS 03/23/2023 103515 $41.72 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC COFFEE PODS/CLIP BOARDS 03/23/2023 103515 $60.77 TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES $2,607.41
1005400 - HUMAN RESOURCES
US BANK COFFEE MAKER CH 03/23/2023 103518 $317.81
US BANK FINANCE DIRECTOR PANEL 03/23/2023 103518 $28.08 US BANK COVID TESTS 03/23/2023 103518 $85.90
US BANK LINKEDIN ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 03/23/2023 103518 $323.88 US BANK CARD 03/23/2023 103518 $6.02
US BANK MILESTONE GIFT 03/09/2023 103448 $31.90
US BANK EE EVENT REFUND 03/09/2023 103448 ($16.15)
US BANK EE EVENT REFUND 03/09/2023 103448 ($13.30)
US BANK LABOR LAW CONFERENCE 03/09/2023 103448 $1,240.00 US BANK AMAZON REFUND 03/09/2023 103448 ($50.00)
US BANK MILESTONE GIFT 03/09/2023 103448 $50.00
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEB 23-FINGERPRINT APPS 03/16/2023 103491 $32.00 COASTAL LIVE SCAN AND INSURANCE FEB 22-FINGERPRINTS 03/09/2023 103452 $30.00 STERLING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. LOST CARD REPLACEMENT 03/16/2023 9000733 $10.00 RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES PART 2 & 3-FINANCE DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT 03/09/2023 103468 $14,700.00 RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES FINANCE DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT 03/23/2023 103539 $7,350.00 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES $24,126.14
1005450 - INFORMATION SERVICES
COX COMMUNICATIONS INC 0013410039730701 - 02/19/23-03/18/23 03/23/2023 103521 $317.49 CDW GOVERNMENT INC ADO ACRO PRO DC 03/23/2023 9000736 $69.99 CDW GOVERNMENT INC CISCO DIRECT MT10-HW 03/23/2023 9000736 $608.24 US BANK ANNUAL REDIRECT SOFTWARE 03/23/2023 103518 $161.00 US BANK HOSTING DOMAINS 03/23/2023 103518 $9.95
US BANK CONSTANT CONTACT 03/23/2023 103518 $55.00
Page: 4 of 11
US BANK ATT LA COLONIA 03/09/2023 103448 $64.20
US BANK ADOBE PHOTOGRAPHY PLAN 03/09/2023 103448 $119.88 US BANK ADOBE ID CREATIVE 03/09/2023 103448 $239.88
US BANK DOMAIN HOSTING 03/09/2023 103448 $9.95
US BANK CONSTANT CONTACT 03/09/2023 103448 $55.00
VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 670601022-01/24/23-02/23/23 03/23/2023 103545 $114.03 WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL MAR 23-AUDIO VISUAL MAINTENANCE 03/23/2023 103547 $499.00 WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL AUG 22-AUDIO VISUAL MAINTENANCE 03/23/2023 103547 $499.00 MANAGED SOLUTION FEB 23-IT Services Managed Solution 03/23/2023 103532 $2,018.10 MANAGED SOLUTION FEB 23-IT Services 03/23/2023 103532 $600.00 MANAGED SOLUTION NOV 22-IT Services 03/23/2023 103532 $2,233.92 MANAGED SOLUTION MAR 23-IT Services 03/23/2023 103532 $2,018.10 FISHER INTEGRATED, INC. JAN 23-WEB STREAMING SVC 03/23/2023 103524 $1,100.00 TING FIBER INC. MAR 23-Ting Fiber-TIDE BEACH LG TOWER 03/23/2023 9000740 $450.00 TING FIBER INC. MAR 23-Ting Fiber-DEL MAR SHORE LG TOWER 03/23/2023 9000740 $450.00 TING FIBER INC. MAR 23-Ting Fiber-SB FACILITIES 03/23/2023 9000740 $3,249.00 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC HEADSET 03/09/2023 103445 $99.30
AMAZON.COM SALES, INC HDMI SPLITTER/8 PORT SWITCH/MONITOR/HDMI CABLE
03/23/2023 103515 $685.98
AMAZON.COM SALES, INC UNMANAGED 16 PORT SWITCH 03/23/2023 103515 $406.83 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC LAPTOP MEMORY/RAM 03/23/2023 103515 $181.51 TOTAL INFORMATION SERVICES $16,315.35
1005550 - PLANNING
US BANK "CA-""IN PROGRESS"" DATE STAMP" 03/09/2023 103448 $89.36 UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY PUB HRNG-DRP22-004 03/23/2023 103544 $389.65 OFFICE DEPOT INC ENVELOPES/PENS/PAPER/POCKET FILE FOLDERS 03/23/2023 103537 $103.40 1 STOP TONER & INKJET, LLC TONER-PLN 03/09/2023 103467 $58.09 CENTRAL SQUARE TRAKIT - ANNUAL MAINT 07/01/22 03/23/2023 103520 $25,972.88 DANIEL WELTE MILEAGE-03/06/23 03/23/2023 103522 $30.13
AMAZON.COM SALES, INC PENS/WAL CLOCK/UTENSIL SET 03/09/2023 103445 $120.70 TOTAL PLANNING $26,764.21
1005560 - BUILDING SERVICES
OFFICE DEPOT INC ENVELOPES/PENS/PAPER/POCKET FILE FOLDERS 03/23/2023 103537 $12.98 TOTAL BUILDING SERVICES $12.98
1005590 - PARKING ENFORCEMENT
US BANK HAMMER AND PRY TOOL 03/23/2023 103518 $43.08
US BANK FOLDER 03/23/2023 103518 $24.23
US BANK CAR BATTERY JUMP STARTER 03/23/2023 103518 $64.92 US BANK PERMIT PAPER 03/23/2023 103518 $25.30
US BANK WIPER FLUID 03/09/2023 103448 $5.92
VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 442224168-01/24/23-02/23/23 03/23/2023 103545 $206.57 OFFICE DEPOT INC ENVELOPES/PENS/PAPER/POCKET FILE FOLDERS 03/23/2023 103537 $20.46 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $125.80 TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT $516.28
1006110 - LAW ENFORCEMENT
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. JAN 23-Sheriff Law Enforcement 03/09/2023 103470 $399,063.64 TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT $399,063.64
1006120 - FIRE DEPARTMENT
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT JAN-FEB 23-005512-000 03/23/2023 103541 $565.48 US BANK FIRE PREVENTION PRINTER INK 03/09/2023 103448 $95.89 US BANK AIR PUMP ACCESS/WARNING TAPE 03/09/2023 103448 $136.20 Page: 5 of 11
US BANK KITCHEN SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $14.49
US BANK PRINTER INK 03/09/2023 103448 $77.34
US BANK REFUND AIR DUSTER 03/09/2023 103448 ($64.62)
US BANK PRINTER INK 03/09/2023 103448 $45.14
US BANK FLAG POLE BRACKET 03/09/2023 103448 $28.00
US BANK EPOXY 03/09/2023 103448 $33.93
US BANK LIGHTER/OIL CHANGE FUNNEL 03/09/2023 103448 $28.96 NORTH COUNTY EVS, INC NCEVS APPARATUS REPAIR 03/23/2023 103536 $19,997.26 ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES PANTS/SHIRTS/SEWING 03/23/2023 103513 $828.74 ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES BOOT/BELT 03/23/2023 103513 $216.48 ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES PANTS/SHIRTS/SEWING 03/23/2023 103513 $963.35 ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES BOOTS 03/23/2023 103513 $194.84 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 962428212 - 12/29/22-01/28/23 03/23/2023 103545 $559.96 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY VEHICLE SVC SEAL KIT/WINDOW REGULATOR 03/23/2023 103543 $1,474.97 REGIONAL COMMS SYS, MS 056 - RCS FEB 23-CAP CODE 03/23/2023 103540 $32.50 FIRE STATS, LLC OCT-DEC 22-FIRE DATA 03/23/2023 103523 $637.50 WEX BANK JAN 23-AUTO FUEL/CR TAX 03/23/2023 103548 $1,712.80 L. N. CURTIS & SONS INC BOOTS 03/23/2023 103531 $658.22 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC TURNOUTS 03/23/2023 103514 $3,706.06 LAWNMOWERS PLUS REPAIR 03/23/2023 103526 $212.87
LINEGEAR FIRE & RESCUE EQUIPMENT COAXSHER CASE/PANTS/INFLUX FIREPRO 03/23/2023 103530 $540.55 THOMAS ROBERT DERR RATTLESNAKE TRAINING 03/09/2023 103477 $1,200.00 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT $33,896.91
1006130 - ANIMAL CONTROL
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY & S.P.C.A. MAR 23-Animal Services 03/16/2023 103503 $7,603.00 TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL $7,603.00
1006150 - CIVIL DEFENSE
AT&T CALNET 3 9391012275-11/24/22-12/23/22 03/23/2023 103517 $167.08 AT&T CALNET 3 9391012275-01/24/23-02/23/23 03/23/2023 103517 $167.43 TOTAL CIVIL DEFENSE $334.51
1006170 - MARINE SAFETY
US BANK ANNUAL PAPER SUBSCRIPTION 03/09/2023 103448 $494.00 US BANK TOW SERVICES 03/23/2023 103518 $90.00
US BANK WINDOW CLEANER 03/23/2023 103518 $14.70
US BANK REPLACEMENT TIRE ON 2481 03/23/2023 103518 $223.09 US BANK AGENCY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 03/23/2023 103518 $500.00 US BANK MS PEST CONTROL SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $9.29 US BANK MS CLEANING SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $24.79
US BANK MS CLEANING SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $45.72
US BANK MEDICAL SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $40.53
US BANK PWC TRAILER REPAIR 03/09/2023 103448 $122.98
US BANK PWC SEAT REPAIR 03/09/2023 103448 $91.80
US BANK WEATHER PROOFING-DMS TOWER 03/09/2023 103448 $15.51 US BANK AIR FILTER 2481 NISSAN 03/09/2023 103448 $24.77 US BANK CPR CERT 03/09/2023 103448 $46.00
US BANK HQ MINOR TOOLS/SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $49.41 US BANK BOARD STRAPS FOR TRUCK 03/09/2023 103448 $52.68 US BANK CPR CER 03/09/2023 103448 $24.00
US BANK EMT CONTINUING EDUCATION 03/09/2023 103448 $237.09 ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES SHIRTS 03/23/2023 103513 $196.11 VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 962428212 - 12/29/22-01/28/23 03/23/2023 103545 $152.04 Page: 6 of 11
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. FORKLIFT RENTAL 03/16/2023 103508 $1,021.82 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $577.17 BRZ PERFORMANCE, LLC MS-POLOS 03/23/2023 103516 $2,482.50 TOTAL MARINE SAFETY $6,536.00
1006510 - ENGINEERING
US BANK APWA PW EVENT 03/23/2023 103518 $349.00
US BANK APWA LUNCHEON 03/23/2023 103518 $45.00
APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTOR 03/16/2023 103505 $231.84 UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY REQUEST BID-2023-05 03/09/2023 103479 $342.46 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $139.50 US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS CWIS#013609,P2#104716,Advance Acct 1441 03/09/2023 9000721 $313,556.00 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY PVC PIPE 03/09/2023 103462 $52.22 TOTAL ENGINEERING $314,716.02
1006520 - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/09/2023 103464 $14.98 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/09/2023 103464 $14.99 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/16/2023 103499 $14.98 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC H-SEWER-STORMDRAIN MAINT 03/09/2023 103444 $1,700.00 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC O-SEWER-STORMDRAIN MAINT 03/09/2023 103444 $1,340.00 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-014-02/02/23-03/01/23 03/16/2023 103504 $243.63 MIKHAIL OGAWA ENGINEERING JAN 23-MANAGING THE STORMWATER PROGRAM 03/09/2023 103463 $268.60 MIKHAIL OGAWA ENGINEERING JAN 23-MANAGING THE STORMWATER PROGRAM 03/09/2023 103463 $118.50 MIKHAIL OGAWA ENGINEERING JAN 23-MANAGING THE STORMWATER PROGRAM 03/09/2023 103463 $6,022.53 MIKHAIL OGAWA ENGINEERING FEB 23-STORMWATER PROGRAM 03/16/2023 103498 $5,571.80 MIKHAIL OGAWA ENGINEERING FEB 23-STORMWATER PROGRAM 03/16/2023 103498 $276.50 SAN ELIJO JPA Q4-OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE FEE 03/09/2023 103472 $2,801.00 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO_3710 FY22/23 SDRSW CO-PERMITEE 03/09/2023 103453 $4,874.00 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $405.80 CLEAN EARTH ENVIROMENTAL SOLUTIONS JAN 23- HHW MONTHLY COLLECTION 03/09/2023 103451 $1,279.60 SUMMIT EROSION CONTROL SANDBAGS/LABOR/TRUCK/LABOR 03/16/2023 103507 $357.84 TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $25,304.75
1006530 - STREET MAINTENANCE
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/09/2023 103464 $25.69 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/09/2023 103464 $25.68 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/16/2023 103499 $25.69 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC HARD HAT 03/16/2023 103492 $24.23 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 011695-000-02/02/23-03/01/23 03/16/2023 103504 $124.37 LEE'S LOCK & SAFE INC LOCKS/KEYS 03/09/2023 103461 $244.38 US BANK F250 TIRE REPLACEMENT 03/23/2023 103518 $648.75 US BANK TRAFFIC SAFETY TRAINING 03/23/2023 103518 $104.00 US BANK TRAFFIC SAFETY TRAINING 03/23/2023 103518 $104.00 US BANK 2017 COLORADO TIRES REPMNT 03/23/2023 103518 $394.78 US BANK SAFETY MEETINGS OUTLINES 03/23/2023 103518 $300.00 US BANK MAINT SUPER ASSOC EVENT 03/23/2023 103518 $105.00 US BANK MAINT SUPER ASSOC EVENT 03/23/2023 103518 $31.20 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SOCAL INC MAR 23-DIG ALERT 03/16/2023 103509 $67.75 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA JAN 23- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 03/09/2023 103465 $1,827.01 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $367.77 ARTURO ZERMENO MILEAGE 03/09/2023 103446 $102.18
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE $4,522.48
1006540 - TRAFFIC SAFETY
Page: 7 of 11
REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC FEB 23- RED LIGHT CAMERA ENFORCEM 03/09/2023 9000725 $7,694.85 TRAFFIC SUPPLY, INC SIGNS 03/09/2023 103478 $275.04
TRAFFIC SUPPLY, INC SIGNS 03/09/2023 103478 $217.43
AT&T CALNET 3 9391012279-01/24/23-02/23/23 03/16/2023 103486 $59.60 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC CROSSING GUARDS-01/22/23-02/04/23 03/09/2023 9000722 $11,036.54 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC CROSSING GUARDS-02/05/23-02/18/23 03/09/2023 9000722 $11,022.68 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC 02/19/23-03/04/23-CROSSING GUARDS 03/23/2023 9000735 $5,546.00 TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY $35,852.14
1006550 - STREET CLEANING
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 011695-000-02/02/23-03/01/23 03/16/2023 103504 $73.04 PRIDE INDUSTRIES FEB 23-TRASH ABATEMENT SERVICES 03/16/2023 103501 $1,773.75 TOTAL STREET CLEANING $1,846.79
1006560 - PARK MAINTENANCE
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/09/2023 103464 $18.19 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/09/2023 103464 $18.19 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/16/2023 103499 $18.19 RANCHO SANTA FE SECURITY SYS INC MAR 23- ALARM MONITORIN 03/09/2023 103469 $331.20 RANCHO SANTA FE SECURITY SYS INC MAR 23- SECURITY PTRL, RESTROOM LKUP 03/09/2023 103469 $661.10 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005506-018 03/16/2023 103504 $229.89 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005506-019 03/16/2023 103504 $652.13 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-012 03/16/2023 103504 $999.61 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-013 03/16/2023 103504 $90.68 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005979-001 03/16/2023 103504 $107.02 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-012448-000 03/16/2023 103504 $135.32 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-012448-001 03/16/2023 103504 $88.26 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-006 03/16/2023 103504 $121.31 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-007 03/16/2023 103504 $90.68 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-009 03/16/2023 103504 $76.94 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-010 03/16/2023 103504 $170.52 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-011 03/16/2023 103504 $251.11 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-000 03/16/2023 103504 $127.26 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-001 03/16/2023 103504 $76.94 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-002 03/16/2023 103504 $320.97 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-004 03/16/2023 103504 $76.94 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-005 03/16/2023 103504 $133.89 GRAINGER INC TOILET SERVOMOTORS 03/09/2023 103456 $286.83 US BANK RAIN GUARD CEDROS ART PED 03/23/2023 103518 $299.52 US BANK CRT LIGHT FUSES 03/23/2023 103518 $12.92
US BANK WINDOW TINTING 03/23/2023 103518 $77.56
US BANK TIDE PARK PLEXI GLASS 03/23/2023 103518 $215.50 US BANK CRT LIGHTING 03/23/2023 103518 $18.92
US BANK GAS CAP 03/23/2023 103518 $8.61
US BANK TRASH BAGS 03/23/2023 103518 $161.43
US BANK SMALL TOOLS 03/09/2023 103448 $35.78
US BANK BASKET BALL NETS (5) 03/09/2023 103448 $37.66
AA FARNSWORTH'S BACKFLOW SERVICES ANNUAL BACKFLOW TEST 03/16/2023 103482 $458.55 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA JAN 23- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 03/09/2023 103465 $16,363.42 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $76.09 WESTERN MOWER & ENGINE CHAINSAW 03/09/2023 103480 $373.55 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE $23,222.68
1006570 - PUBLIC FACILITIES
Page: 8 of 11
SEASIDE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING FEB 23-HVAC SERVICES AT CITY FACILITIES 03/09/2023 103473 $990.00 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC BATTERIES/CLOSET KIT 03/09/2023 103454 $55.47 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC FUSE 03/09/2023 103454 $3.67

DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC EPOXY TIE SET/RAT BAIT/ MOUSE TRAP/PAINT

ROLLERS
03/09/2023 103454 $146.55
DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC ORGANIZER 03/09/2023 103454 $40.93 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC ACRYLIC PANEL 03/09/2023 103454 $16.47 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC CLOSET KIT 03/09/2023 103454 $30.16 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC HALOGEN HEATER 03/09/2023 103454 $75.41 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC GLOVES 03/09/2023 103454 $29.07 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC ANT SPRAY 03/16/2023 103492 $13.99 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC PUTTY KNIFE/ADHESIVE 03/16/2023 103492 $20.34 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC PLASTIC SHEETING 03/16/2023 103492 $33.93 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO INC TUBE COUPLING/COPPER PIPE/DRAIN BASIN 03/16/2023 103492 $36.42 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-008 03/16/2023 103504 $490.63 US BANK BATHROOM VENT FAN MOTOR 03/23/2023 103518 $24.77 US BANK BATTERIES 03/23/2023 103518 $32.30
US BANK RECHARGEABLE PROF FLASHLIGHT 03/23/2023 103518 $132.04 US BANK PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $18.73
US BANK PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $22.78
US BANK AIR FRESHENERS 03/09/2023 103448 $18.31
US BANK TIRE TREAD GAUGE 03/09/2023 103448 $15.07
SAN ELIJO JPA Q4-OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE FEE 03/09/2023 103472 $3,720.00 SAN ELIJO JPA FY 22-CLOSE OUT 03/09/2023 103472 ($5,625.00) NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA JAN 23- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 03/09/2023 103465 $2,811.93 24 HOUR ELEVATOR, INC MAR 23-ELEVATOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT 03/16/2023 103481 $185.22 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES-CH 03/16/2023 103489 $246.73 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC FEB 23-PEST/RODENT CONTROL-FS 03/16/2023 103496 $38.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC FEB 23-PEST/RODENT CONTROL-FCCC 03/16/2023 103496 $124.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC FEB 23-PEST/RODENT CONTROL-PW 03/16/2023 103496 $35.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC FEB 23-PEST/RODENT CONTROL-MS 03/16/2023 103496 $64.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC FEB 23-PEST/RODENT CONTROL-FC 03/16/2023 103496 $39.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC FEB 23-PEST/RODENT CONTROL-CH 03/16/2023 103496 $52.00 HABITAT PROTECTION, INC FEB 23-PEST/RODENT CONTROL-LC 03/16/2023 103496 $64.00 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC JAN 23-JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC 03/16/2023 103488 $8,329.00 CALIFORNIA OFFICE CLEANING, INC FEB 23-JANITORIAL/CUSTODIAL SVC 03/16/2023 103488 $7,470.00 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $126.81 PRIDE INDUSTRIES FEB 23-TRASH ABATEMENT SERVICES 03/16/2023 103501 $1,773.75 TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES $21,701.48
1007100 - COMMUNITY SERVICES
MUNICIPAL MANAGEMT ASSOC OF SC MAR 23-24-MEMBERSHIP 03/23/2023 103534 $30.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES $30.00
1007110 - GF-RECREATION
US BANK TREE STORAGE CONTAINERS 03/09/2023 103448 $439.36 US BANK TREE STORAGE CONTAINERS 03/09/2023 103448 $73.23 US BANK COMM CNTR TRASH CANS 03/09/2023 103448 $39.02
US BANK SANTA SUIT CLEANING 03/09/2023 103448 $117.72
US BANK HEATERS-LCCC 03/23/2023 103518 $96.94
WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $81.74 COMMERCIAL COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. SPEAKER SYSTEM-REC 03/23/2023 103519 $2,017.47 TOTAL GF-RECREATION $2,865.48
Page: 9 of 11
1205460 - SELF INSURANCE RETENTION
US BANK POSTAGE 03/23/2023 103518 $8.69
SECTRAN SECURITY INC MAR 23-ARMORED TRUCK SERVICES 03/23/2023 103542 $170.71 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC. FEB 23-2202.RIECKEN 03/23/2023 9000737 $61.60 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC. FEB 23-2302.BARRERA 03/23/2023 9000737 $130.90 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC. FEB 23-2301.BARRERA 03/23/2023 9000737 $146.30 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC. FEB 23-2303.GIST 03/23/2023 9000737 $231.00 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC. FEB 23-2304.WONG 03/23/2023 9000737 $277.20 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0040.003-JAN 23-DEP427CNYN 03/16/2023 103487 $4,966.40 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN 96-0040.001-JAN 23-CLM.2203 03/16/2023 103487 $27.40 TOTAL SELF INSURANCE RETENTION $6,020.20
1355450 - ASSET REPLACEMENT-INFO SYS
US BANK ULTRA WIDE MONITOR 03/09/2023 103448 $619.18
TOTAL ASSET REPLACEMENT-INFO SYS $619.18
1356170 - ASSET REPLACEMENT-MARN SFTY
US BANK PWC SLED ACCESSORIES 03/09/2023 103448 $516.66
TOTAL ASSET REPLACEMENT-MARN SFTY $516.66
2037510 - HIGHWAY 101 LANDSC #33
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005979-000 03/16/2023 103504 $184.21 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA JAN 23- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 03/09/2023 103465 $2,323.20 TOTAL HIGHWAY 101 LANDSC #33 $2,507.41
2047520 - MID 9C SANTA FE HILLS
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-014 03/16/2023 103504 $193.35 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-015 03/16/2023 103504 $223.95 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-016 03/16/2023 103504 $193.35 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-017 03/16/2023 103504 $61.56 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-024 03/16/2023 103504 $201.47 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-025 03/16/2023 103504 $205.53 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-026 03/16/2023 103504 $193.35 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-018 03/16/2023 103504 $61.56 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-019 03/16/2023 103504 $61.56 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-020 03/16/2023 103504 $193.35 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-021 03/16/2023 103504 $197.41 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-022 03/16/2023 103504 $193.35 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005979-023 03/16/2023 103504 $193.35 SANTA FE HILLS HOA FEB 23-FY23 SANTA FE HILLS HOA 03/09/2023 9000726 $28,750.00 TOTAL MID 9C SANTA FE HILLS $30,923.14
2057530 - MID 9E ISLA VERDE
ISLA VERDE HOA FEB 23-FY23 ISLE VERDE HOA 03/09/2023 103459 $433.33 TOTAL MID 9E ISLA VERDE $433.33
2077550 - MID 9H SAN ELIJO #2
SAN ELIJO HILLS II HOA FEB 23-FY23 HOA PAYMENT 03/09/2023 103471 $6,550.00 TOTAL MID 9H SAN ELIJO #2 $6,550.00
2087580 - COASTAL RAIL TRAIL MAINT
SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 02/02/23-03/01/23-005506-020 03/16/2023 103504 $399.08 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 01/03/23-03/01/23-005506-003 03/16/2023 103504 $121.31 NISSHO OF CALIFORNIA JAN 23- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 03/09/2023 103465 $4,973.58 TOTAL COASTAL RAIL TRAIL MAINT $5,493.97
2135550 - DEVELOPER PASS-THRU- PLANNING
HARRIS & ASSOC. INC. JAN 23-BIOLOGY REVIEW 03/09/2023 103457 $2,989.00 Page: 10 of 11
HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL JAN 23-DRP22-026 THIRD PARTY BIOLOGY 03/09/2023 103458 $2,047.50 TOTAL DEVELOPER PASS-THRU- PLANNING $5,036.50
2196110 - COPS PROGRAM
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. JAN 23-Sheriff Law Enforcement 03/09/2023 103470 $8,092.95 TOTAL COPS PROGRAM $8,092.95
2286510 - TRANSNET EXTENSION-CIP
CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES JAN 23-9538 SAFE RT SCH 03/09/2023 103450 $9,930.09 TOTAL TRANSNET EXTENSION-CIP $9,930.09
2406510 - COMM DEV BLOCK GR (CDBG)-CIP
UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY 9355.23-INVITING BIDS-2023-02 03/09/2023 103479 $308.14 TOTAL COMM DEV BLOCK GR (CDBG)-CIP $308.14
2466510 - PER CAPITA GRANT FUND-CIP
CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES JAN 23-9538 SAFE RT SCH 03/09/2023 103450 $29,790.28 TOTAL PER CAPITA GRANT FUND-CIP $29,790.28
2505570 - COASTAL BUSINESS/VISITORS
SOLANA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Q4-CHAMBER/VISITORS CENTER 03/09/2023 103475 $7,500.00 ACTION BOUNCE COMPANY FUN JUMP FOR EGG HUNT-04/08/23 03/16/2023 103483 $485.00 BELLY UP TAVERN LLC FY 23-CONCERT AT THE COVE 03/09/2023 103447 $750.00 LINDA M SINNACHCHARIGE FACE PAINT EGG HUNT-04/08/23 03/16/2023 103497 $350.00 TOTAL COASTAL BUSINESS/VISITORS $9,085.00
2556180 - CAMP PROGRAMS
US BANK CPR TRAINING MANNEQUINS 03/23/2023 103518 $460.09 US BANK CPR CERTIFICATIONS - PW 03/23/2023 103518 $144.00 TOTAL CAMP PROGRAMS $604.09
2706120 - PUBLIC SAFETY- FIRE
VERIZON WIRELESS-SD 962428212 - 12/29/22-01/28/23 03/23/2023 103545 $114.03 ARNOLD A LEWIN CY 22-SB CERT PROGRAM 03/23/2023 103528 $1,505.00 LIFE-ASSIST, INC CSA17-OPIOID OVERDOSE KIT 03/23/2023 103529 $101.18 NATIONWIDE MEDICAL SURGICAL INC CSA17-LEVALBUTEROL 03/23/2023 103535 $66.22 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC CSA.17-KENDICK TRACTION DEVICE 03/23/2023 103515 $317.82 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY- FIRE $2,104.25
2706170 - PUBLIC SAFETY- MARINE SAFETY
US BANK GU-CSA.17 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 03/09/2023 103448 $17.23 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY- MARINE SAFETY $17.23
4506190 - SAND REPLNSHMNT/RETENTION
WARWICK GROUP CONSULTANTS, LLC FEB 23-CONSULTANT SERVICES 03/23/2023 103546 $5,833.00 WARWICK GROUP CONSULTANTS, LLC FEB 23-CONSULTANT SERVICES 03/23/2023 103546 $5,833.00 SUMMIT ENVIROMENTAL GROUP, INC. FEB 23-9926-PROF SVC 03/23/2023 9000739 $7,245.00 TOTAL SAND REPLNSHMNT/RETENTION $18,911.00
4506510 - SANDREPLNSHMNT/RETNTN-CIP
DOMUSSTUDIO ARCHITECTURE FEB 23-9449 MS CENTR 03/16/2023 103493 $4,560.00 US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS CWIS#013609,P2#104716,Advance Acct 1441 03/09/2023 9000721 $746,150.00 US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS CWIS#013609,P2#104716,Advance Acct 1441 03/09/2023 9000721 $300,000.00 TOTAL SANDREPLNSHMNT/RETNTN-CIP $1,050,710.00
459 - MISC. CAPITAL PROJECTS
NU-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC DEC 22-SEWER/STORM DRAIN REHAB 03/09/2023 103466 $14,340.95 NU-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC DEC 22-SEWER/STORM DRAIN REHAB 03/09/2023 103466 $14,340.95 TOTAL MISC. CAPITAL PROJECTS $28,681.90
4596510 - MISC.CAPITALPROJECTS-ENG
Page: 11 of 11
UT SAN DIEGO - NRTH COUNTY NOTICE-BID NO:2023-01 03/16/2023 103510 $384.20 TOTAL MISC.CAPITALPROJECTS-ENG $384.20
4596520 - MISC CAPITAL PROJ - ENVIR
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO NOV 22-CLIMATE ACTION PLAN UPDATE 03/09/2023 9000728 $3,210.33 UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO DEC 22-CLIMATE ACTION PLAN UPDATE 03/09/2023 9000728 $6,247.15 TOTAL MISC CAPITAL PROJ - ENVIR $9,457.48
5097700 - SANITATION
MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/09/2023 103464 $10.70 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC LAUNDRY-PW 03/09/2023 103464 $10.70 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM INC UNIFORM SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 03/16/2023 103499 $10.70 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC J-SEWER CLEANING 03/09/2023 103444 $675.00 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC E-SEWER CLEANING-10,127 03/09/2023 103444 $6,380.01 AFFORDABLE PIPELINE SERVICES INC C-SEWER CLEANING-26,926 03/16/2023 103484 $16,963.38 SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 005506-014-02/02/23-03/01/23 03/16/2023 103504 $730.89 US BANK RIVER ROCK 03/09/2023 103448 $347.73
SAN ELIJO JPA Q4-OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE FEE 03/09/2023 103472 $464,319.00 SAN ELIJO JPA Q4-OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE FEE 03/09/2023 103472 $296,863.00 SAN ELIJO JPA FY 22-CLOSE OUT 03/09/2023 103472 ($19,086.00) AT&T CALNET 3 9391012277-01/24/23-02/23/23 03/16/2023 103486 $16.55 WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 02/08/23-03/07/23-AUTO FUEL 03/16/2023 103511 $152.18 NU-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC DEC 22-SEWER/STORM DRAIN REHAB 03/09/2023 103466 $24,479.66 NU-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC DEC 22-SEWER/STORM DRAIN REHAB 03/09/2023 103466 $24,479.66 TOTAL SANITATION $816,353.16
REPORT TOTAL: $3,152,690.81
COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.3.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance
SUBJECT: Report on Changes Made to the General Fund Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23
BACKGROUND:

Staff provides a report at each Council meeting that lists changes made to the current Fiscal Year (FY) General Fund Adopted Budget. The information provided in this Staff Report lists the changes made through March 22, 2023.

DISCUSSION:

The following table reports the revenue, expenditures, and transfers for 1) the Adopted General Fund Budget approved by Council on June 23, 2021 (Resolution 2021-092) and 2) any resolutions passed by Council that amended the Adopted General Fund Budget.

Date Action Description Revenues Expenditures Transfers from GF Net Surplus 06/23/2021 Reso 2021-092 Adopted Budget 22,148,385 (20,867,260) (482,500) $ 798,625 07/14/2021 Reso 2021-097 MS MOU (11,570) 787,055
04/13/2022 Reso 2022-034 Keyser Marston (15,000) 772,055 06/08/2022 Reso 2022-041 On-Call Repair Svcs (30,000) 742,055 06/08/2022 Reso 2022-065 Janitorial (20,000) 722,055
06/22/2022 Reso 2022-082 FY23 Budget Update 1,965,100 (615,680) (1,423,000) 648,475 08/24/2022 Reso 2022-106 Lew Edwards Group (36,000) 612,475 09/14/2022 Reso 2022-102 SBFA MOU (182,000) 430,475
12/14/2022 Reso 2022-138 Pacific Ave Utility Underground - Pase 2 (42,000) 388,475 02/22/2023 Reso 2023-017 Yunex Traffic (45,000) 343,475 01/25/2023 Reso 2023-007 CIP - Roof Replacement FCCC and MS Cntr (120,000) 223,475 01/25/2023 Reso 2023-014 Emanuel Jones and Associates (150) 223,325 01/25/2023 Reso 2023-015 License Plate Recognition Cameras (46,064) 177,261 02/22/2023 Reso 2023-022 Nissho Landscape Maint. Services (25,000) 152,261 03/08/2023 Reso 2023-027 HDL Audit Services (25,000) 127,261 03/08/2023 Reso 2023-028 USACE Construction Funding (313,556) (186,295) 03/22/2023 Reso 2023-023 FY23 Mid-Year Update 400,000 68,117 281,822

GENERAL FUND - ADOPTED BUDGET PLUS CHANGES
As of March 22, 2023
General Fund - Operations
April 12, 2023
General Fund Budget Changes - FY 2023

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA
FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
WORK PLAN:

N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Receive the report
∙ Do not accept the report
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive the report listing changes made to the FY 2022-2023 General Fund Adopted Budget.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Date Action Description Revenues Expenditures Transfers from GF Net Surplus 03/22/2023 Reso 2023-023 FY23 Mid-Year Update 750,000 750,000 Date Action Description Revenues Expenditures Transfers from GF Net 12/09/2022 Reso 2022-123 FY22 Surplus - PARS Contribution (720,000) (720,000) 12/09/2022 Reso 2022-123 FY22 Surplus - Pavement Mgmt Prgm (150,000) (870,000) General Fund Unreserved Balance
General Fund - Measure S
AGENDA ITEM # A.4.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager’s
SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of Resolution 2023-045 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Three-Year
Agreement for Animal Control Services with the San
Diego Humane Society
BACKGROUND:

On May 26, 2017, the City received a letter from the County of San Diego stating its intent to terminate animal control services effective June 30, 2018, for all local cities excluding unincorporated areas. Subsequently, after City Staff met with other affected jurisdictions, on May 9, 2018, Council adopted Resolution 2018-049 authorizing the City Manager to execute a three-year agreement for animal control services with the San Diego Humane Society (SDHS). The term of that agreement was for a period of thirty-six (36) months, commencing on July 1, 2018 and terminating on June 30, 2021, and allowed for two oneyear extensions. Both one-year extensions have been agreed upon and the current agreement will expire on June 30, 2023.

The term of the proposed agreement (Agreement) would also be for a period of thirty-six (36) months, commencing on July 1, 2023 and terminating on June 30, 2026. As per the prior agreement, SDHS and the City may extend the Agreement for two (2) additional one-year periods. The contract’s costs would be determined annually with the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 set at $91,236. For future years, the cost of the contract will be subject to City Manager approval and calculated using a formula that will incorporate the total calls for services, animal intake, and current population of new and current contract cities.

This item is before City Council to consider approving Resolution 2023-045 (Attachment 1) authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement (Attachment 2) with SDHS for animal control services.

DISCUSSION:

On May 26, 2017, the County of San Diego submitted a letter to the City terminating the agreement for animal control services effective June 30, 2018. The SDHS was the only local organization that was both interested in and capable of providing the necessary services that the County was previously providing. SDHS was also the most competitive AGENDA ITEM # A.4.
service provider for animal control services. As noted above, Council approved an agreement with SDHS for Animal Control Services on May 9, 2018.

During the previous contract period (FY2018 through FY2023), SDHS personnel have demonstrated their competence and professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the desired animal control services.

SDHS provides animal sheltering and animal field services for animals seized or impounded by Animal Field Services or delivered by members of the general public within the City. Under the terms of the proposed Agreement, the City will continue to benefit from SDHS’s Project Wildlife and their range of programs and services aimed at retaining zero euthanasia of all healthy and treatable animals.

An important additional service that SDHS provides is monitoring and enforcing the City’s dogs on the beach regulations. This service was not previously provided by the County.

This is a significant additional service that has both assisted the lifeguards with focusing on their main priority of monitoring the beach and ocean and protecting the safety of beach-goers and will help to ensure that dog owners comply with applicable regulations.

SDHS has provided exceptional service during the duration of the original contract. SDHS personnel have proved to be reliable, responsive and work well with City Staff. Staff is recommending the approval of a new Professional Service Agreement with the San Diego Humane Society for animal control services.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed FY 2023/24 annual cost of for the proposed Agreement with SDHS is $91,236. This proposed cost is the exact same as it was for FY 2022/23. The annual net cost of the Agreement is determined using a formula based on the historical data of animal intake, calls for service, population, and number of new and current contract cities.

Therefore, the cost for future years will be set at the beginning of the fiscal year (costs will be submitted to the City no later than April 1).

The cost of the Agreement will be appropriated from the FY 2023/24 Animal Control operating budget. The term of the agreement would be for a period of three (3) years, commencing on July 1, 2023 and terminating on June 30, 2026. SDHS and the City may extend the agreement for two (2) additional one-year periods.

WORK PLAN:

N/A
OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff recommendation
• Approve Staff recommendation with modifications
• Deny Staff recommendation
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council consider adoption of Resolution 2023-045 authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with San Diego Humane Society for the delivery of Animal Control Services for the City of Solana Beach.

CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2023-045

2. Animal Service Agreement
RESOLUTION 2023-045

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN

DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY FOR ANIMAL CONTROL

SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach (City) currently contracts with the San Diego Humane Society for animal control services; and
WHEREAS, the existing Professional Services Agreement with the San Diego Humane Society is set to expire on June 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the San Diego Humane Society (SDHS) has proven to be an effective service provider for animal control services; and WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to contract with SDHS for animal control services; and
WHEREAS, the term of the agreement would be for a period of thirty-six (36) months, commencing on July 1, 2023 and terminating on June 30, 2026, with the option to extend the agreement for two (2) additional one-year periods; and WHEREAS, the cost of the first year of services (FY 2023/34) is $91,236 with each subsequent year’s annual net costs adjusted and set at the beginning of each fiscal year based on the Compensation formula included in the approved agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager execute a Professional Service Agreement with the San Diego Humane Society for animal control services.

3. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City for a period of thirty-six (36) months for an annual net amount set at the beginning of each fiscal year based on the Compensation formula in the agreement.

Resolution 2023-045
Animal Control Services

4. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to approve two successive one-year extensions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2023, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk

FIRST AMENDED ANIMAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This First Amended Animal Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into effective the __ day of ____, 2023 ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, a municipal corporation (the "CITY") and the SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND S.P.C.A., a California nonprofit corporation ("SDHS") (collectively, the "Parties"). This Agreement is made with reference to the following recitals.

RECITALS
A. On July 1, 2018 San Diego Humane Society began providing animal care and control services to the CITY and has done so continuously since that time.

B. It has been determined to be in the CITY' s best interest to retain specialized, professional services to provide animal control and sheltering services since the CITY does not provide such services.

C. The CITY desires to contract with SDHS as an independent contractor and SDHS desires to provide services to the CITY as an independent contractor.

D. SDHS personnel have demonstrated their competence and professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services designated herein by virtue of their experience, training, education and expertise.

E. The purpose of this Agreement is to ensure the proper, humane and efficient handling, ownership, treatment and disposition of dogs, cats and other domesticated animals, and to ensure the enforcement of laws, ordinances and regulations of the State of California and of the CITY concerning the regulation, licensing, impounding and disposition of dogs, cats and other domestic animals within the CITY.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions and terms set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. SDHS shall provide animal sheltering and animal field services required by and in accordance with the laws, regulations, ordinances and codes of the State of California, the County of San Diego, and the CITY as further specified by this Agreement. The Services to be performed by SDHS pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall consist of the Services enumerated below. In addition to those Services identified below, SDHS may routinely provide the CITY with the additional "Community Engagement and Services" outlined in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference, without an additional cost.

Exhibit A is subject to modification at SDHS's discretion based on resources and capacity.

1.1. Animal Sheltering. SDHS shall provide the CITY with animal shelter services consistent with public shelter functions to received and care for all dogs, cats and other domestic animals seized or impounded by Animal Field Services or delivered by members of the general public, provide humane disposition of animals, euthanizing, if warranted, and disposing of euthanized animals and deceased animals brought in by CITY residents. More specifically, SDHS shall maintain animal shelters at 2905 San Luis Rey Road; 572 Airport Road, Oceanside, California; 3500 Burnet Drive, Escondido, California; 1373 N. Marshall Avenue, El Cajon, California; and 5480 and 5500 Gaines Street, San Diego, California (collectively, the "Shelter"), which shall be open for public service and operation during reasonable days and hours of operation similar to other such facilities within the County of San Diego ("County"), and which shall comply with the standards described by the laws of the State of California, and the ordinances of the County and the CITY. Such animal shelter services shall include:
a. The housing and care of stray domestic animals for the legal hold period according to the laws of the State of California, and the ordinances of the County and the CITY.
b. The housing and care for domestic animals under rabies quarantine for the legal hold period according to the laws of the State of California and the ordinances of the County and the CITY.
c. Housing and care for police and animal cruelty holds for a minimum of fourteen (14) days.
d. Providing lost and found opportunities for the general public for domestic animals brought to the Shelter.

1.2. Animal Sheltering Criteria. SDHS animal sheltering Servicesshall include:
a. Feed, care for, and the disposition of all animals coming into the possession of SDHS using safe and humane methods in accordance with the State of California laws and the ordinances of the County and the CITY.
b. Assume all expenses to maintain and operate the Shelter and properly care for the animals.
c. Manage the dog license program within the CITY to include:
i. Maintaining files including current and expired dog license and the owners who live within the CITY for the past three (3) years. ii. Issuing or causing to be issued new and renewed licenses to dog license applicants within the CITY.
iii. Issuing or causing to be issued, when appropriate, Service Dog Licenses within the CITY.
iv. Issuing or causing to be issued, when appropriate, Dangerous Dog licenses within the CITY.
v. Conducting follow-up enforcement of licensing and rabies vaccinations within the CITY.

1.3. Animal Field Services. SDHS shall humanely and efficiently enforce all applicable animal field service laws, regulations, ordinances and codes of the CITY (and any County laws, regulations and ordinances as adopted by the CITY) pertaining to animal field services with respect to the scope of work set forth below. SDHS shall provide the CITY with the following animal field services in response to complaints generated by the public, law enforcement and the CITY:
a. Investigation and enforcement of animal crueltylaws and related activities. b. Picking up and caring for injured domestic animals.
c. Addressing dangerous domestic animal situations.
d. Monitoring and responding to bites and enforcing rabies quarantine requirements.
e. Investigation and enforcement of vicious or dangerous dog complaints and activities associated therewith.
f. Patrolling and impounding stray dogs running at large. g. Patrolling, both by foot and in vehicle, and, if necessary, and enforcement of the City’s dogs on beach regulations including leash requirements and areas in which dogs are prohibited.
h. Picking up and caring for stray and abandoned domestic animals contained by citizens and found within the City limits.
i. Picking up and rehabilitating or humanely euthanizing injured wildlife. j. Responding to and investigating barking dog complaints.

1.4. Animal Field Services Requirements. SDHS animal field service requirements include:
a. SDHS shall perform the Services in accordance with all laws and regulations applicable to the CITY.
b. SDHS shall provide daily the appropriate number of Humane Officer(s) (as defined below) and an animal containment vehicle(s) and equipment for the performance of animal field services.
c. SDHS shall humanely and efficiently enforce all laws of the State of California, the· County, and the CITY pertaining to animal field services that are within the scope of SDHS's obligations under this Agreement. In the event that new laws enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement would require increased services by SDHS, the cost for such additional services shall be added to the projected costs for the year immediately following enactment and billed accordingly.
d. SDHS Humane Officers (as defined below) and duly trained license coordinators are authorized to issue criminal and/or administrative citations for violations of CITY animal field service laws, and to issue notices as provided by law. SDHS's Humane Officers (as defined below) shall prepare appropriate reports concerning violations, file such reports with the applicable authority when necessary, and stand ready and available to testify in a court or administrative hearing when called upon to do so concerning such violations.
e. SDHS shall be responsible for all expenses associated with the Services. f. SDHS shall respond to calls for animal field services between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. daily ("Field Service Hours"). Based on the priority of the call, SDHS will respond within the times included in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B is subject to reasonable change at SDHS's discretion and upon written notice to the CITY. SDHS may increase service levels and expand Field Service Hours based on service call volume and community need. g. SDHS will respond to calls for service outside of Field Service Hours. Afterhours duty officer(s) will provide emergency responses to Priority One calls during nonField Service Hours. SDHS may increase service levels based on service call volume and community need. "Priority One" calls are defined as a prompt, essential emergency response for the following:
i. Any law enforcement agency requesting immediate emergency assistance.
ii. Animal bite where the domestic animal continues to pose an immediate threat, bite injury is to the head, or the bite injury can be considered severe. iii. Any act of cruelty and/or neglect to animals that is in progress or which places an animal in imminent danger.
iv. Any domestic animal either known to be dangerous or vicious by previous determination in an administrative hearing or one that is perceived to be an immediate threat or menacing those individuals reporting the event. v. Any live domestic animal, which is presenting an immediate hazard to humans, such as a live domestic animal in traffic lanes of a major thoroughfare or highway.
vi. Any domestic animal that is sick, injured and in immediate danger.

2.0 SDHS PERSONNEL. SDHS shall employ appropriate personnel and staff to assist and carry out its duties and obligations of this Agreement.

2.1. Humane Officers. SDHS shall have at all times during the term of this Agreement a reasonable number of Humane Officers qualified under California Corporations Code section 14502 and California Penal Code section 830.9 capable of performing and enforcing the provisions of the CITY ordinance related to domestic animals. They shall not carry firearms in the performance of their duties but may carry non-lethal weapons. Each Humane Officer shall complete within one (1) year of date of hire or internal transfer a course in training related to the exercise of his/her powers, which course shall meet the minimum standards prescribed by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training and the State Humane Association of California.

2.2. Performance Standards. SDHS agents and employees shall treat the public with courtesy and respect at all timesin performing all duties and obligations under thisAgreement.

2.3. Compliance with Laws. SDHS shall comply with personnel policies and procedures that conform to federal and state laws with respect to hiring and firing practices.

3.0 OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. The CITY shall provide the following to assist SDHS in performing required animal control functions under this Agreement.

3.1. CITY will provide training on specific CITY processes and other municipal techniques that humane officers may be expected to carry out.

3.2. The CITY shall endeavor to work with SDHS in support of the licensing programs geared towards increased compliance, higher return owner rates, reduction in the number of animals needing housing care, and protecting residents against dangerous and/or vicious dogs and habitual offenders of animal laws.

3.3. The CITY shall endeavor to work with SDHS in support of educating the community about SDHS programs including but not limited to lost and found, adoption, intake diversion, and community support services.

4.0 REPORTS AND RECORDS.

4.1. Quarterly Reports. SDHS shall prepare quarterly reports to the CITY which shall provide the following information: (i) animal shelter operations (as it pertains to the Agreement), including the number of stray animals impounded and their disposition; (ii) all administrative or criminal citations processed; and (iii) animal field service activities including the number and type of incidents or reports investigated.

4.2. Governmental Reports. Should the CITY be required to furnish information to any other government agency, SDHS agrees to timely provide information that the CITY may need to meet such request as long as the request is within the scope of this Agreement.

4.3. Annual Reports. By no later than sixty (60) days following the end of each fiscal year, SDHS shall provide an annual report to the CITY with the information required by Section

4.1 for the preceding year; and revenues generated for any Services provided under this Agreement.

4.4. Record Retention. All records and information required to be kept by SDHS pursuant to this Agreement shall be kept in accordance with applicable record retention schedules or three (3) years, whichever is longer.

4.5. Business and Financial Records; Inspection. SDHS shall maintain accurate financial books and business records consisting of all records related to SDHS's reporting requirements under this Agreement, budgeting and calculating compensation for the Services provided under this Agreement, SDHS's gross costs for providing the Services under this Agreement and the revenues generated from the Services provided pursuant to this Agreement ("Books and Records"). SDHS shall keep said Books and Records on a generally recognized accounting basis. With sufficient notice SDHS will provide requested records to the City Manager or his or her designee.

5.0 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. All work by SDHS shall be performed in accordance with applicable city, state and federal laws, statutes and regulations.

6.0 LICENSE, PERMITS. ETC. SDHS represents and declares to CITY that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to practice its profession. SDHS represents and warrants to CITY that SDHS shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, any license, permit, or approval which is legally required for SDHS to practice its profession. SDHS shall obtain and maintain a CITY business license during the term of this Agreement, if required.

7.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. At all times during the term of this Agreement, SDHS, any employees of SDHS and any subcontractors employed by SDHS shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of the CITY. The CITY shall have the right to control SDHS only insofar as the results of SDHS's Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, the CITY shall not have the right to control the means by which SDHS accomplishes its Services.

Neither SDHS nor SDHS's employees shall in any event be entitled to any benefits to which CITY employees are entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime, any retirement benefits, workers' compensation benefits, any injury leave or other leave benefits, SDHS being solely responsible for all such matters, as well as compliance with social security and income tax withholding and all other regulations and laws governing such matters.

8.0 WORKERS' COMPENSATION. Pursuant to California Labor Code section 1861, SDHS hereby certifies that SDHS is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and SDHS will comply with such provisions, and certification of proof of compliance as a part of this Agreement.

9.0 NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST. SDHS shall not enter into any other contract which conflicts with its obligations under this Agreement. For the limited purpose of interpreting this section, SDHS shall be deemed a "city officer or employee," and this section shall be interpreted in accordance with the California Government Code section 1090.

10.0 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.

10.1. Reports and documents prepared or provided by SDHS under this Agreement shall be the property of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold SDHS free and harmless from any claim arising from any use, other than the purpose intended, of the reports and documents, prepared or provided by SDHS. SDHS may retain a copy of all materials produced under this Agreement for the purpose of documenting their participation in this Agreement.

10.2. Animal license information and data, including, but not limited to, animal owner identification and address, animal name, description, license type and expiration date, are the property of the CITY and must be presented to the CITY in any reasonable document and computer format requested in writing by the CITY. All such information must be provided to the CITY within thirty (30) days of the CITY's request.

11.0 COMPENSATION. SDHS shall receive the following compensation for the performance of the Services.

11.1. Payments by the CITY. The CITY shall make payments to SDHS as follows:

For the first twelve (12) month term of this Agreement, "Year 1 Compensation" (July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024), compensation shall be $91,236, or $7,603 per month for each month.

11.2. Formula to Calculate Payments by the CITY. For future years of the contract after Year 1 the formula in calculating payments by the CITY for services provided by SDHS shall be based on projected costs for service and:
a. SDHS will project the costs required to provide animal control, licensing and sheltering services to all the cities under contract with SDHS. SDHS will project costs based on actual historical expenses, adjusted for expected changes in the upcoming contract year.

SDHS will track historical statistics by each city under contract with SDHS and will use those statistics to allocate the projected costs to the CITY. The nature of the statistics tracked by SDHS may include, but are not limited to, Animal Intake, Animal Days Sheltered by SDHS, vet provided services, licenses issued, and services provided by Humane Law Enforcement Officers. SDHS will also factor in any additional services requested by the CITY that are unique to that CITY and requires additional costs to SDHS. b. By March 31st of each year, SDHS will provide the CITY with a budget packet to include their compensation cost to SDHS. SDHS will provide to the CITY a breakdown of the total compensation figure by the types of expenses required in providing services to the CITY.

SDHS will provide explanations for changes in compensation not related to changes in CPI.

The budget packet will include a form, for the CITY to sign and return to SDHS, acknowledging the compensation amount for the upcoming year. c. In order to minimize unexpected year over year fluctuations in compensation required by the CITY, SDHS is required to communicate to the CITY any annual projected increase that exceeds CPI by 3% by January 31st for the upcoming contract year starting on the following July 1st.

11.3. Other Revenue. SDHS shall be entitled to retain as compensation for the Services:
a. All reasonable user fees, service charges and proceeds collected by SDHS in connection with licensing, impounds, and redemption of domestic animals from the Shelter;
b. any fines received by SDHS or the CITY arising out of any administrative citations issued by Humane Officers; and
c. any other non-citation related revenue generated as a result of this Agreement.

All user fees and service charges shall not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service.

12.0 DISASTER RELIEF SERVICES. SDHS shall be designated the "Essential Support Function/Official Responder'' with respect to any disaster to which the CITY is included within the disaster area designated by a governmental agency. SDHS may invoice the CITY for any costs and expenses, including staff overtime and equipment purchases and rentals, incurred by SDHS with respect to additionalservices provided by SDHS in connection with any disaster relief effort and which are eligible for reimbursement to Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") Disaster Assistance Policy 9523.19 or any successor disaster assistance policy promulgated by FEMA. The CITY shall promptly reimburse SDHS for such costs and expenses, provided the CITY has received reimbursements from FEMA. SDHS shall provide any available supporting documentation requested by the CITY for any funding or reimbursement request regarding the disaster that is made to any governmental agency. SDHS may also bill for disaster response such as deployment of the Specialized Disaster Response Emergency Team, large and small animal evacuation, and large and small animal sheltering if the CITY has requested assistance.

13.0 TERM AND TERMINATION.

13.1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for the period of thirty-six (36) months commencing on July 1, 2023, and terminating on June 30, 2026.

13.2. Mutually Agreed Extension. At least thirty (30) days before the expiration of the initial term of this Agreement, SDHS and CITY may extend this Agreement for two (2) one-year periods with any necessary revisions under the written consent of both Parties.

13.3. Administrative Extension. Upon the expiration of the term of this Agreement, the Parties retain the right to extend the Agreement for a period of 120 days on the same terms and conditions as currently then in effect in order to finalize a new Agreement.

13.4. Termination for Convenience. Either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by providing the other party with 180 days prior written notice.

13.5. Termination for Cause. At any time during the term of this Agreement, in case of material breach of this Agreement by either party, the non-breaching party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving the breaching party written notice of such breach and demanding that such breach be cured within sixty (60) days (or in the case of defaults in payment of monetary amounts due which are certain in amount and undisputed, ten (10) days) and, if such breach has not been cured at the end of such period(s), this Agreement shall terminate without the necessity of any party taking any further action. In the event a longer notice or cure period is required by applicable law, the cure period specified in this section or the effective date of termination shall conform to, but not exceed, such requirement.

13.6. Compensation Payable Upon Termination. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to either Section 13.3 or 13.4,so long as SDHS has been providing the services specified herein, SDHS shall be entitled to receive the compensation and fees accrued through the effective date of termination.

14.0 INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law, SDHS shall indemnify, defend (with counsel acceptable to the CITY approval of which shall not be unreasonably withheld), and hold harmless the CITY, and its officers, officials, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, costs or liability that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to any act or omission by SDHS in the performance of Services under this Agreement, and the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of SDHS, its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of Services under this Agreement. SDHS's duty to indemnify under this Section shall not include liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, damage or expense arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct by the CITY or its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees. SDHS's indemnification obligations shall not be limited by the insurance provisions of this Agreement. The Parties expressly agree that any payment, attorneys' fees, costs or expense CITY incurs or makes to or on behalf of an injured employee under the CITY's self-administered workers' compensation is included as a loss, expense, or cost for the purposes of this Section, and that this section will survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement for a period of two (2) years or the conclusion of any legal proceeding, including appeal, arising out of or related to this Agreement, whichever is later.

15.0 INSURANCE. SDHS shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claimsfor injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the SDHS, their agents, representatives, employees, contractors, subcontractors or volunteers. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best'srating of no less than "A" and "VII" unless otherwise approved in writing by the CITY's Risk Manager.

15.1. SDHS's liabilities, including but not limited to SDHS's indemnity obligations, under Section 14 of this Agreement, shall not be deemed limited in any way to the insurance coverage required herein. Maintenance of specified insurance coverage is a material element of this Agreement.

15.2. Types and Amounts Required. SDHS shall maintain, at minimum, the following insurance coverages for the duration of this Agreement. If SDHS maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown below, the CITY shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by SDHS. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY. a. Excess/Umbrella Liability Policy. SDHS shall maintain an Excess/Umbrella Liability Policy with an aggregate limit of not less than Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000).

The Excess/Umbrella Liability Policy shall meet all of the insurance requirements for the Commercial General Liability policy, including, but not limited to, the additional insured, contractual liability, “insured contract” definition, occurrence definition, primary and noncontributory, indemnity, and defense requirements. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until SDHS’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.
b. Commercial General Liability ("CGL'). SDHS shall maintain CGL Insurance written on an ISO Occurrence form or equivalent providing coverage at least as broad which shall cover liability arising from any and all personal injury or property damage in the amount of $2,000,000 per occurrence and subject to an annual aggregate of $4,000,000.

There shall be no endorsement or modification of the CGL limiting the scope of coverage for either insured vs. insured claims or contractual liability. All defense costs shall be outside the limits of the policy. An Umbrella Liability policy or Excess Liability policy may be used in combination with a CGL policy to meet the required limits of insurance in this section, provided that the required endorsements in section 15.4 are added to such policy. If SDHS maintains any insurance policy with higher limits than the minimums shown in this section above, including an Umbrella Liability policy or an Excess Liability policy, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to coverage for any higher limits maintained by SDHS.
c. Commercial Automobile Liability. SDHS shall maintain Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance for all of the SDHS's automobiles including owned, hired and non-owned automobiles, written on an ISO form CA 00 01 12 90 or a later version of this form or an equivalent form providing coverage at least as broad for bodily injury and property damage for a combined single limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence. Insurance certificate shall reflect coverage for any automobile (any auto). d. Workers' Compensation. SDHS shall maintain Workers' Compensation insurance for all of the SDHS's employees who are subject to this Agreement and to the extent required by applicable state or federal law, a Workers' Compensation policy providing at minimum $1,000,000 employers' liability coverage. SDHS shall provide an endorsement that the insurer waives the right of subrogation against the CITY and its respective elected officials, officers, employees, agents and representatives.

15.3. Waiver of Subrogation. SDHS hereby grants to CITY and its respective officers, officials, employees, and representatives a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of SDHS may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. SDHS agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

15.4. Additional Required Provisions. The commercial general liability, excess/including any umbrella liability policy or excess liability policy, and automobile liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
a. The CITY, its officers, officials, employees, volunteers and representatives shall be named as additional insureds. The CITY's additional insured status must be reflected on additional insured endorsement form which shall be submitted to the CITY. b. The policies are primary and non-contributory to any insurance that may be carried by the CITY, as reflected in an endorsement which shall be submitted to the CITY.

15.5. Verification of Coverage. SDHS shall furnish the CITY with original certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section 15. The endorsement should be on forms provided by the CITY or on other than the CITY's forms provided those endorsements conform to CITY requirements. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive SDHS’s obligation to provide them. The CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications at any time.

15.6. Subcontractor Coverage. SDHS shall also require each of its subcontractors to maintain insurance coverage that meets all the requirements of this Agreement.

15.7. CITY Options. SDHS agrees that if it does not keep the aforesaid insurance in full force and effect, the CITY may either: (i) despite section 13, above, immediately terminate this Agreement; or (ii) take out the necessary insurance and pay, at SDHS's expense, the premium thereon.

16.0 CUSTOMARY SERVICES. SDHS shall be permitted without the CITY's prior written consent to enter into agreements with third party providers of services that are customary in the industry to assist SDHS to carry out its day-to-day operations.

17.0 NON-DISCRIMINATION. SDHS shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, age, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, military or veteran status, medical condition, genetic information, gender expression, marital status, or sexual orientation. SDHS shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their sex, race, color, age, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, military or veteran status, medical condition, genetic information, gender expression, marital status, or sexual orientation and shall make reasonable accommodation to qualified individuals with disabilities or medical conditions.

Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of payor other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. SDHS agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees, contractors, agents and/or applicants for employment any non-discrimination notices required by law and any non-discrimination notices provided by CITY setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.

18.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS.

18.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement comprises the entire agreement between the CITY and SDHS concerning the Services, and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements.

18.2. Notices. Any notices given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be served either: (i) by hand delivery; (ii) by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested; or (iii) by transmittal over an electronic transmitting device (with confirmation of receipt), such as facsimile or email, provided that a complete copy of any notice so transmitted shall also be mailed by U.S. mail. Notices shall be deemed received at the earlier of actual receipt or three (3) days following deposit in U.S. mail, postage prepaid. From time to time the parties may designate a new address for purposes of notice hereunder by notice to the other parties hereto in the manner provided above. Initial notice addresses are as follows:

To the CITY: City of Solana Beach
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, CA 920175
Attn: Gregory Wade, City Manager
Email: [email protected]
With a copy to: Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
501 West Broadway, Suite 1600
San Diego, CA 92101
Attn: Johanna Canlas, City Attorney
Email: [email protected]
To SDHS: San Diego Humane Society
5500 Gaines Street
San Diego, California 92110
Attn:Julianna Tetlow, Director of Government Relations
Fax: 619-299-0198
Email: [email protected]
With a copy to: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 501 W. Broadway, 19th Floor
San Diego, California 92101
Attn: Whitney Hodges, Esq.

Email: [email protected]

18.3. Interpretation; Drafting. This Agreement shall be construed equally as against the Parties hereto and shall not be construed against the party responsible for its drafting. All prior drafts of this Agreement shall be disregarded in construing the intent of any provision contained herein or therein, and such prior drafts shall be inadmissible in any proceeding at which any such provision is to be interpreted.

18.4. Headings. The headings of the articles and sections herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a part of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

18.5. No Third-party Beneficiaries. The covenants contained herein are made solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and successors and assigns of such parties as specified herein and shall not be construed as having been intended to benefit any third party which is not a party to this Agreement.

18.6. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or a portion thereof is held, by a court of competent jurisdiction, to be illegal or invalid, such provision or portion thereof shall be deemed to be severed and deleted; and neither such provision, its severance or deletion shall affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

18.7. Modification. This Agreement may be amended, modified or rescinded only by a writing signed by all parties to this Agreement or by their duly authorized agents.

18.8. NoWaiver. No waiver of any right underthis Agreement shall be deemed effective unless contained in a writing signed by the party charged with such waiver, and no waiver of any right arising from any breach or failure to perform shall be deemed to be a waiver of any such future right or of any other right arising under this Agreement.

18.9. California Law; Venue. This Agreement and its performance shall be governed, interpreted, construed, and regulated by the laws of the State of California. Any action brought to enforce or interpret any portion of this Agreement shall be brought in the County of San Diego, California.

18.10. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties by and through their respective authorized officials, have executed this Agreement effective as of the date written above.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND S.P.C.A., A municipal corporation. a California nonprofit corporation.

Gregory Wade Gary Weitzman, DVM, MPH, CAWA
City Manager President and CEO
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Johanna N. Canlas
City Attorney
ATTEST:

Angela Ivey
City Clerk

EXHIBIT A
Community Engagement and Services
In addition to those Services identified in Section 1 of the Agreement, SDHS may routinely provide the CITY with the additional "Community Engagement and Services." The services identified below be provided at no additional cost to the CITY unless otherwise specified and is subject to modification at SDHS's discretion based on resources and capacity. Such community engagement and additional services may include:
• Public education.
• Animal behavior modification program.
• Pet education classes.
• Community events.
• Affordable Community Veterinary assistance programs such as:
‒ Spay/Neuter Services
‒ General medical veterinary care – preventative and basic sick care > Ear cleanings
> Nail Trims
> Bloodwork
> Deworming
‒ Wellness resources including vaccines, flea medications and education ‒ Pharmacy services
• Vaccinations including rabies clinics
• Microchipping.
• Safety net service programs.
• Owner requested euthanasia.

EXHIBIT B
Callsfor Service - Priority Categories
Priority Categories Response Time Example of Call
Priority 1 Within 30 Minutes Persons in Danger
Animal in Immediate Danger
Urgent Medical CareNeeded
Animal in Secured Vehicle ("Hot Dog")
Animal Fighting Cases
Intentional Cruelty In-Progress
Assist Public Safety Agency
Bite to Person (Animal Not Contained)
Exigent Circumstances
• Gunshot
• Stabbing
• Broken Bones
• Serious Open Wounds
• Visibly Injured/frapped Animal
Street Sale of Animals (after all other
Priority 1 Calls are Handled)
Priority 2 Within 3 Hours In-Progress Incidents Not Reaching Priority 1 Bite to Person (Animal Contained - Reported
within 24 Hours)
Running-At-Large (In Progress)
Abandonment
Captured/Caged Animals/Confined Strays
Priority 3 Within 12 Hours Intentional Cruelty (Not In-Progress) Non-Life Threatening Medical Care Needed
Non-Exigent Circumstances
• Skin Infections
• Emaciated
• Over-Grown Hooves
Hoarding - No Immediate Emergency
After-the-Fact Bite (Reported After 24 Hours)
Priority4 Within 24 Hours Check the Well-Being with a Reporting Party No Water (Temperature Dependent)
Emaciated (Thin or Bones Showing)
Lead/Leash too Short
Inadequate or No Shelter
Even Sale of Animals (i.e., Flea Markets)
Priority 5 Within 48 Hours Check theWell-Being- NoReporting Party Running-at-large (Not in Progress)
Pet Shop Inspections
Rodeo or Circus Inspections
Kennel Inspections
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.5

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of Resolution 2023-040 Three-Year Cooperative Agreement Extension of the Community
Development Block Grant and Home Investment Partnerships Programs
______________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND:

The Federal Government requires local jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000 to enter into cooperative agreements on a three-year cycle if they desire to participate in receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds. On February 3, 2023, the County of San Diego Housing and Community Development Services (HCDS) sent its notification letter (Attachment 1) to the City requesting verification that the City of Solana Beach will continue its participation for the next three years as has been done in the past.

This item is before the City Council for the consideration of Resolution 2023-040 (Attachment 2) to authorize the automatic renewal of the Cooperation Agreement (Attachment 3) for three additional years covering Fiscal Years (FY) 2024-2027.

DISCUSSION:

In 2011, the City Council authorized execution of a Cooperative Agreement with the County of San Diego for the Community Development Program. This agreement is set up to be automatically extended to a new consecutive three-year term by resolution of the City Council if the City intends to continue participation. If the City elects not to participate with the County, the City would need to retain its own representatives to participate on a competitive basis to apply for the same amount of grant funding. Given the relatively limited eligible projects and additional resources required to effectively compete for these funds, participating in the CDBG program with the County would be the most efficient and cost-effective approach. Adoption of Resolution 2023-040 informs the County of the City’s desire to continue to participate in the cooperative agreement and be eligible for grant funds that have been approximately $50,000 annually.

April 12, 2023
CDBG Cooperative Agreement Extension

The previous CDBG funding approved by the City Council was used to construct pedestrian ramps at public street intersections that comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The City recently awarded a construction contract for the FY 2022/23 ADA Pedestrian Ramps project. The FY 2023/24 CDBG application was submitted to the County of San Diego in October 2022. County’s approval of funding and notice to proceed is anticipated later this year.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff recommendation.
• Deny Staff recommendation and do not participate in this program. • Provide alternative direction to Staff.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 2023-040 authorizing the automatic renewal of the Community Development Block Grant Cooperation Agreement (Attachment 2) for the qualification periods of July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025; July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026; and July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027.

CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. County of San Diego Notification letter (dated February 3, 2023)

2. Cooperation Agreement between the County of San Diego and the City for a Community Development Program

3. Resolution 2023-040
Attachment 1

NICK MACCHIONE, FACHE

AGENCY DIRECTOR
February 3, 2023
Mo Sammak
City of Solana Beach
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, CA 92075
(f[ountu of ~an JBttgo

HEAL TH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
3989 RUFFIN ROAD, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
(858) 694-4801 • FAX (858) 467-9713

DAVID ESTRELLA

DIRECTOR, HOUSING ANO COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
2024-2026 CDBG PARTICIPATING CITIES COOPERATION AGREEMENT Dear CDBG Participating City:

The current San Diego Urban County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Cooperation Agreement (Agreement), effective July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2024, includes an automatic renewal provision. The renewal option allows for the City's continued participation for an additional three consecutive periods covering July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2027.

San Diego Urban County is a federally designated area that includes the unincorporated area of San Diego County and all non-entitlement cities within the County that choose to participate in the CDBG Program.

In accordance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Planning and Development (CPD) Notice, CPD-22-07 (attached), issued on April 25, 2022, the County of San Diego Housing and Community Development Services (HCDS) is required to provide notification of your City's opportunity to continue participating with the San Diego Urban County in fiscal years 2023-2025 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Programs and Annual Funding Plans.

The CPD Notice describes the administrative steps required by HUD for the CDBG San Diego Urban County qualification process. In further accordance with the requirements of Notice CPD-22-07, please be advised that if a City elects to remain with the Urban County and execute a Cooperation Agreement, the Cooperation Agreement must remain in effect until all CDBG funds and any CDBG and/or HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program revenue received from funded CDBG and/or HOME activities have been expended and funded facilities are completed. Also, participating cities cannot withdraw from the Cooperation Agreement while it remains in effect.

If the City elects to remain in the Urban County, the City would be ineligible to apply under the separate small cities or State CDBG Programs. The City would also automatically participate in the HOME Program if the Urban County receives HOME funding, but could only participate in the HOME Program as part of the Urban County.

Participating cities may also elect not to participate in the Urban County CDBG Program and funding. If a City elects not to participate in the Urban County, the City must advise the County and HUD in writing of its decision to be excluded by March 3, 2023. Such election to be excluded will be effective for the entire three-year period for which the Urban County qualifies unless the City specifically elects to be included in a subsequent year for the remainder of the Urban County's three-year qualification (Cooperation Agreement) period. In that case, the City must provide such notice of election in writing.

If your City decides not to participate in the 2024-2026 Urban County Cooperation Agreement, your Chief Cooperative Agreement
February 3, 2023

Executive Officer must notify both HUD and the County of the decision in writing before March 3, 2023 .

Such notification to HUD should be addressed to:

Chin Woo Choi, Program Manager
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Los Angeles Area Office Region IX
611 W. Sixth Street, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 9001 7
Notification to the County should be addressed to:

David Estrella, Director
Housing and Community Development Services
3989 Ruffin Road
San Diego, CA 92123
Please submit a letter from the City Manager with the city's intent to participate for the next CDBG Program qualification period to our office by March 3, 2023.

If the City intends to continue participation in the Urban County, a resolution from City Council authorizing the automatic renewal of the Cooperation Agreement for the qualification periods of July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025; July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026; and, July 1, 2026 - June 30, 2027, must be submitted to County of San Diego Housing and Community Development Services as soon as possible.

Sincerely,
Sarah Snook Brunson, Housing Program Analyst
Housing and Community Development Services
Enclosure
Attachment 2

A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY

OF SAN DIEGO AND CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
This Agreement is made and entered into this .1§. day of May, 2011, by and between the County of San Diego, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "County," and City of Solana Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, located in the County of San Diego, hereinafter called "City," collectively referred to as "Parties." RECITALS:

WHEREAS, in 1974, the U. S. Congress enacted and the President signed a law entitled, The Housing and Community Development Act of 197 4, as amended, herein called the "Act". The Act is omnibus legislation relating to Federal involvement in a wide range of housing and community development activities and contains eight separate titles.

WHEREAS, Title I of the Act is entitled, Community Development, and consolidates several existing categorical programs for housing and community development into new programs for such housing and development under block financial grants. The primary objectives of Title I are the improvement and development of metropolitan cities and urban counties or communities by providing financial assistance annually for area-wide plans and programs of housing assistance, public services and public works.

WHEREAS, in 1990, the U. S. Congress enacted and the President signed a law entitled, The National Affordable Housing Act, herein called the "Housing Act". The Housing Act is legislation relating to Federal involvement in affordable housing activities.

WHEREAS, the Housing Act requires an Urban County (as defined in the Housing Act) to certify that it is following a Consolidated Plan (as defined in the Housing Act) in order to receive Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships funds.

WHEREAS, the County of San Diego has requested of the Department of Housing and Urban Development that it be qualified as an Urban County and thereby become eligible for financial entitlement to receive Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships funds. Pursuant thereto, the County has been informed preliminarily, subject to final determination, that it will qualify as an Urban County and be eligible for funds.

WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Block Grant Regulations issued pursuant to the Act (the "Regulations") provide that qualified urban counties must submit an Annual Funding Plan (as defined in the Housing Act) to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for funds and that cities and smaller communities within the metropolitan area not qualifying as metropolitan cities may join the County in said Annual Funding Plan and thereby become a part of a more comprehensive County effort WHEREAS, as the applicant, the County must take the full responsibility and assume all obligations of an applicant under the statute. This includes the analysis of needs, the setting of objectives, the development of community development and housing 2 affordability strategies and plans, the community development program, and the assurances or certifications.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, recitals and other provisions hereof, the Parties agree as follows:

I. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them under the Act.

2. The Parties agree that this Agreement covers the Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Program and the HOME Investment Partnerships Program.

3. The Parties agree to cooperate to undertake or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities.

4. The City agrees that it shall be included in the Annual Funding Plan the County shall develop and submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Title I Housing and Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds under the Act and the Housing Act.

5. The City agrees that it may not apply for grants under the Small Cities or State Community Development Grant programs from appropriations for fiscal years during the period in which it is participating in the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program under this Agreement, and may not participate in a HOME consortium except through the Urban County, regardless of whether the Urban County receives a HOME formula allocation.
3 6. The City shall prepare or work with the County in the preparation of a detailed project or projects or other activities to be conducted or performed within the City the plan of which shall be included in the aforesaid Annual Funding Plan.

7. The County agrees to include the City in its Annual Funding Plan under the Act and to work with the City in the preparation of the detailed project or projects or other activities to be conducted or performed within the City pursuant to the Annual Funding Plan.

8. The County is hereby authorized to carry out activities which will be funded from annual Community Development Block Grant funds from Fiscal Year 2012-2014 appropriations and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds.

The City and the County recognize that the County shall be the governmental entity required to execute any grant agreement received pursuant to its Annual Funding Plan and that it shall there by become legally liable and responsible there under for the proper performance of the plan and program. The City agrees that it shall fully cooperate with the County in all things required and appropriate to comply with the provisions of any Grant Agreement received by the County pursuant to the Act and its Regulations.

9. Pursuant to 24 CFR 570.501(b), the City agrees and does hereby commit itself to undertake, conduct or perform or assist the County in undertaking, conducting or performing the essential community development and lower-income housing assistance activities identified in the plan and program contemplated hereunder pursuant to the Act.

The City is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement of entering into a written agreement with the County as described in 24 CFR 570.503.
4 10. All funds received by the County in accordance with its Annual Funding Plan shall be identified and allocated to the specific projects or activities set out in the Annual Funding Plan and such allocated amounts shall be expended exclusively for such projects or activities; provided, however, that a different distribution may be made when necessary to comply with Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.

11. The City shall notify the County of any income generated by the expenditure of Community Development Block Grant funds received by the City. Such program income may be paid to the County, or the City may retain the program income subject to the provisions of this Agreement, the Act and its Regulations. Any program income retained must only be used for eligible activities in accordance with all Community Development Block Grant requirements as then apply.

12. The County shall monitor the use of any program income, requiring appropriate record-keeping and reporting by the City as may be needed for this purpose, and shall report the use of such program income to HUD. In the event of close-out or change of status of the City, all program income on hand or received by the City subsequent to the close-out or change of status shall be paid to the County.

13. The City shall notify the County of any modification or change in the use · of real property acquired or improved in whole or in part using Community Development Block Grant funds that is within the control of the City, from that use planned at the time of acquisition or improvement including disposition. Such notification shall be made within thirty (30) days of such change of use.
5 14. The City shall reimburse the County in an amount equal to the current fair market value, less any portion thereof attributable to expenditures of non-Community Development Block Grant funds, of property acquired or improved with Community Development Block Grant funds that is sold or transferred for a use which does not qualify under the Regulations. The City shall fully inform the County of such program income within thirty (30) days of the sale or change of use of property acquired or improved with Community Development Block Grant funds.

15. In the event of close-out or change of status of the City or termination of this Agreement between the County and the City, such program income resulting from the disposition or transfer of property acquired or improved with Community Development Block Grant funds shall be paid to the County by the City.

16. City has adopted and is enforcing a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within their jurisdictions against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and a policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within jurisdictions.

17. The term of this Agreement, known as the COUNTY CDBG Urban County Qualification period, shall cover fiscal years 2012-2014, commencing on July 1, 2012, and ending on June 30, 2014, unless an earlier date of termination is fixed by HUD, pursuant to the Act. Notwithstanding the above, if there are activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement that are not yet completed or funded, then for the purpose of those activities only, this Agreement shall remain in effect until all Community Development Block Grant funds received pursuant to this Agreement, and any program income received with respect 6 to activities carried out pursuant to this Agreement are expended, and the funded activities are completed. The Parties cannot terminate or withdraw from this Agreement while it is in effect. The Agreement automatically renews to a new consecutive three-year terms, unless either Party provides written notice at least 60 days prior to the end of the term that it elects not to participate in a new qualification period. A copy of that notice must be sent to the HUD Field Office. Before the end of each three-year term, the County will notify the City in writing, by the date specified in HUD's urban county qualification notice for the next qualification period, of its right not to participate in the urban county for a successive threeyear term with a copy of the notification sent to the HUD Field Office.

18. It is anticipated that the 2012/2013 Annual Funding Plan will be approved prior to July 1, 2012. All subsequent periods of performance hereunder shall be agreed to by written notification of this Agreement, fully executed by the Parties.

19. The Parties shall adopt amendments to this Agreement incorporating any changes necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County qualification Notice by HUD prior to a subsequent three-year extension of the term. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be.submitted to HUD as required by the regulations. Such failure to comply will void the automatic renewal for such qualification period.

20. The Mayor and City Attorney of the City shall execute and submit to the County of San Diego the HUD Certification Forms with respect to the community development activities carried out within the boundaries of this City. It is further understood that the County will rely upon the Certifications executed by the Mayor and City Attorney for purposes of executing Certification Forms for submission to HUD. 7 21. All records of the City respecting these Annual Funding Plans and any project undertaken pursuant thereto shall be open and available for inspection by auditors assigned by HUD and/or the County on reasonable notice during the normal business hours of the City.

22. The Parties agree to take all actions necessary to comply with the Urban County's certification required by section I 04(b) of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Housing Act, section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended and other applicable laws.

23. The Parties agree that no Urban County funding will be expended for activities in or in support of any cooperating unit of general local government that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes the County's actions to comply with its fair housing certification.

24. If Community Development Block Grant funds are not awarded to the County by the U.S. Department of Housing and Community Development, the County's obligation to distribute those funds to the Urban County members will be terminated.

25. The Parties agree that if City fails to obligate funds within 12 months of the notice to proceed or to expend funds within 36 months of obligation for an eligible project or activity identified in the Annual Funding Plan pursuant to Paragraphs 6 and 7, the County may recapture and reallocate such unexpended funds at its sole discretion. The recaptured funds shall be made available for reprogramming to other eligible activities as deemed appropriate by the County, as Grantee for the Urban County. 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the governing bodies of the respective Parties have authorized this Cooperation Agreement and direct its execution by their respective chief executive officers this _
1 _< day of m c:,..y, 2011. The terms and provisions of this Agreement \ are fully authorized under State and local law and the Agreement provides full legal authority for the County to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Director, Mayor
Housing and Community Development
City Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:

COUNTY COUNSEL acknowledges that the terms and provisions of the agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and the agreement provides full legal authority for the County of San Diego to undertake, or assist in undertaking, essential community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities.

BY ~~e~
Senior Deputy
~ ~
9 Attachment 3
RESOLUTION 2023-040

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE CITY’S
DESIRE TO PARTICIPATE IN FISCAL YEARS 2024-2025,
2025-2026 AND 2026-2027 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

BLOCK GRANT APPLICATIONS PROGRAM AND HOME

INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) of the County of San Diego administers the San Diego Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (“Programs”); and WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to participate in these Programs; and WHEREAS, in 2020, the City entered into a three-year Cooperative Agreement with the County Housing and Community Development Department for the Community Development Program; and the agreement has a renewal option that allows an automatic three year extension with City Council authorization.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council authorizes the automatic renewal of the Community Development Block Grant Cooperation Agreement for the qualification periods of July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025; July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026; and July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April 2023, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________
AGENDA ITEM # A.6.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager/Human Resources
SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of Resolution 2023-044 Approving the Creation and Adoption of a Principal
Management Analyst Job Description/Position
BACKGROUND:

In accordance with the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations, Section 8.10, the City Council authorizes and approves all salary and benefit plans for employees and establishes salary ranges pursuant to the recommendation of the City Manager. Salary and benefits for non-represented employees (confidential, management and seasonal/part-time employees) are included in the Salary and Compensation Plan approved by the City Council each fiscal year. The City Council must also approve a Salary and Compensation Plan for all employees to coincide with fiscal appropriations of a new fiscal year and new budget. Subsequent mid-year revisions to the adopted Salary and Compensation Plan may be recommended by the City Manager pursuant to City Personnel Rules and approved by the City Council.

New Classifications:

It is the responsibility of the City Manager to consistently engage in organizational analysis of various City operations to improve efficiency and effectiveness and ensure the most economical means of conducting business is achieved. Section 2.08.070, Section D, of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC), “Powers and Duties (of City Manager)” Administrative Reorganization of Offices, states:

It shall be the duty and responsibility of the City Manager to conduct studies and effect such administrative reorganization of offices, positions or units under the City Manager’s direction as may be indicated in the interest of efficient, effective and economical conduct of the City’s business.

In order to keep pace with the current labor market, to assist in the recruitment and retention of City personnel and to provide additional opportunity for professional growth an advancement within the City, Staff is recommending the following:

1. Creation of a Principal Management Analyst classification.

Resolution 2023-044 - Principal Management Analyst Position

2. Updating the FY 2022/2023 Management Salary Schedule (Schedule 1) to include the Principal Management Analyst position at pay grade M-4.

This item is before the City Council for consideration of Resolution 2023-044 (Attachment 1) to approve the updated FY 2022/2023 Management Salary Schedule 1 (Attachment 2) to include a Principal Management Analyst position, and to approve the creation and addition of the Principal Management Analyst position (Attachment 3) to the City’s job classifications.

DISCUSSION:

The City Manager recommends approval and adoption of the Principal Management Analyst classification and update the FY 2022/2023 Salary Management Salary Schedule 1 accordingly at pay grade M-4.

Classification Updates
Staff recommends creating and adopting a Principal Management Analyst position in order to keep pace with the current labor market and to allow for additional growth and advancement opportunities within the City, as well as to provide flexibility in recruitment of new employees based on skills and qualifications.

The Principal Management Analyst is an advanced level analyst position responsible for conducting difficult, sensitive, and complex administrative and technical work under general direction, where assignments are subject to infrequent review while work is in progress. The position would serve a variety of administrative, coordinative, analytical and community or City Commission liaison functions as required by the changing needs of the City and as directed by the City Manager, Assistant City Manager or other Department Director. The immediate need for establishment of this position is to fill a vacancy created by the departure of the City’s Senior Management Analyst that served as liaison to the Climate Action Commission and performed high-level support to both the City Manager’s and Finance Departments.

It is expected that an employee hired in this position will exercise considerable discretion and independent judgment in performing extensive liaison and coordination responsibilities with City Staff and representatives of public agencies, commissions, and community groups. The Principal Management Analyst position is a FLSA exempt, at-will position under the Management Employees salary schedule 1, pay grade M-4.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: Not a project as defined by CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Increase of $20,000 to the General Fund and $2,000 to non-General Fund funds in FY 2022/2023 appropriations allocated between salary and benefits as determined by the Finance Department.

WORKPLAN: N/A
Resolution 2023-044 - Principal Management Analyst Position

OPTIONS:
• Approve the creation of the Principal Management Analyst position at pay grade M-4 of the Management Salary Schedule 1.
• Do not approve the creation of the Principal Management Analyst position at pay grade M-4 of the Management Salary Schedule 1.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2023-044 approving the creation of the Principal Management Analyst position at pay grade M-4 of the Management Salary Schedule 1.

2. Approve a FY 2022/2023 appropriation of $20,000 to the General Fund and $2,000 to non-General Fund funds allocated between salary and benefits as determined by the Finance Department.

3. Authorize the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2022/2023 Adopted Budget accordingly.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2023-044

2. Updated FY 2022/2023 Management Salary Schedule 1

3. Principal Management Analyst job description
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 2023-044

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE

CREATION AND ADOPTION OF A PRINCIPAL

MANAGEMENT ANALYST POSITION AND UPDATING THE
CITY’S FY 2022/2023 CLASSIFICATION PLAN AND THE
MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE 1
WHEREAS, the City Council authorizes all salary and compensation plans (Section 8.10 of the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations); and WHEREAS, the City Council must approve any changes to the salary and compensation plan for employees; and
WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the City Manager to consistently engage in organizational analysis of various City operations to improve efficiency and effectiveness and ensure the most economical means of conducting business is achieved (Section

2.08.070, Section D, of the Solana Beach Municipal Code); and WHEREAS, a new Principal Management Analyst job description has been created and added to the City’s Classification Plan and the Management Salary Schedule 1; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the City Manager’s recommendations for creation of the Principal Management Analyst position and is prepared to approve and adopt the new classification and update the FY 2022/2023 Salary Management Salary Schedule 1.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

2. The Principal Management Analyst classification has been created and added to the FY 2022/2023 Salary Management Salary Schedule 1.

3. The Finance Director/Treasurer increase the FY2022/2023 appropriations $20,000 to the General Fund and $2,000 to non-General Fund funds allocated between salary and benefits.

4. Except as identified above, the terms of the FY 2022/2023 Salary and Compensation Plans shall continue in full force and effect for all employees.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April 2023, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
Resolution 2023-044
Creation of Principal Management Analyst

ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

JOHANNA CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk
FY 2022/2023
UPDATED 04/12/2023

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES
SALARY SCHEDULE 1
EFFECTIVE APRIL 14, 2023
M1 Management Analyst Annual $64,854.40 $74,568.00 $84,302.40 $94,036.80 $103,750.40 Human Resources Analyst Monthly $5,405 $6,214 $7,025 $7,836 $8,646 Recreation Supervisor Bi-weekly $2,702 $3,107 $3,513 $3,918 $4,323 Executive Assistant to City Manager/Council Hourly $31.18 $35.85 $40.53 $45.21 $49.88 Public Works Supervisor
M2 Deputy City Clerk Annual $74,193.60 $83,470.40 $92,726.40 $102,003.20 $111,280.00 Senior Human Resources Analyst Monthly $6,183 $6,956 $7,727 $8,500 $9,273 Senior Management Analyst Bi-weekly $3,091 $3,478 $3,864 $4,250 $4,637 Hourly $35.67 $40.13 $44.58 $49.04 $53.50
M3 Network System Engineer Annual $81,598.40 $91,811.20 $102,003.20 $112,195.20 $122,408.00 Senior Accountant Monthly $6,800 $7,651 $8,500 $9,350 $10,201 Senior Civil Engineer Bi-weekly $3,400 $3,825 $4,250 $4,675 $5,100 Senior Planner Hourly $39.23 $44.14 $49.04 $53.94 $58.85 M4 Information Technology Manager Annual $89,772.80 $100,984.00 $112,195.20 $123,427.20 $135,054.40 Principal Human Resources Analyst Monthly $7,481 $8,415 $9,350 $10,286 $11,255 Principal Management Analyst Bi-weekly $3,741 $4,208 $4,675 $5,143 $5,627 Principal Planner Hourly $43.16 $48.55 $53.94 $59.34 $64.93 Public Works Operations Manager
Recreation Manager
Risk Manager
M4-A Assistant to the City Manager Annual $98,737.60 $111,092.80 $123,427.20 $135,761.60 $148,096.00 Human Resources Manager Monthly $8,228 $9,258 $10,286 $11,313 $12,341 Principal Civil Engineer Bi-weekly $4,114 $4,629 $5,143 $5,657 $6,171 Hourly $47.47 $53.41 $59.34 $65.27 $71.20
M5 Fire Battalion Chief (2912 annual hours) Annual $102,094.72 $114,849.28 $127,632.96 $140,358.40 $153,142.08 Monthly $8,508 $9,571 $10,636 $11,697 $12,762
Bi-weekly $4,254 $4,785 $5,318 $5,848 $6,381
Hourly $35.06 $39.44 $43.83 $48.20 $52.59
M6 Finance Manager Annual $108,617.60 $122,200.00 $135,761.60 $149,344.00 $162,926.40 Marine Safety Captain Monthly $9,051 $10,183 $11,313 $12,445 $13,577 Bi-weekly $4,526 $5,092 $5,657 $6,223 $6,789
Hourly $52.22 $58.75 $65.27 $71.80 $78.33
M6-A Fire Battalion Chief (2080 annual hours) Annual $112,299.20 $126,339.20 $140,379.20 $154,398.40 $168,459.20 Monthly $9,358 $10,528 $11,698 $12,867 $14,038
Bi-weekly $4,679 $5,264 $5,849 $6,433 $7,019
Hourly $53.99 $60.74 $67.49 $74.23 $80.99
M7 Deputy Fire Chief Annual $114,878.40 $132,121.60 $149,344.00 $166,587.20 $183,809.60 Monthly $9,573 $11,010 $12,445 $13,882 $15,317
Bi-weekly $4,787 $5,505 $6,223 $6,941 $7,659
Hourly $55.23 $63.52 $71.80 $80.09 $88.37
M8 Administrative Services Director/Assistant City
Manager Annual $126,360.00 $145,308.80 $164,278.40 $183,248.00 $202,196.80 City Clerk Monthly $10,530 $12,109 $13,690 $15,271 $16,850 City Engineer/Public Works Director Bi-weekly $5,265 $6,055 $6,845 $7,635 $8,425 Community Development Director Hourly $60.75 $69.86 $78.98 $88.10 $97.21 Fire Chief
Finance Director/City Treasurer
Human Resources Director
75th
Percentile Pay Greade Job Classifications Frequency Minimum Maximum 25th Percentile Midpoint City of Solana Beach
Attachment 2
Class specifications are intended to present a descriptive list of the range of duties performed by employees in the class. Specifications are not intended to reflect all duties performed within the job.

DEFINITION
Under general direction of the City Manager or Assistant City Manager, provides a variety of professional management support to the City by developing policies and procedures, overseeing projects, programs, and agreements, conducting studies, developing recommendations for action, and acting as liaison for the City with a variety of private and public organizations and regulatory agencies; provides expert professional assistance to City management staff in areas of expertise; fosters cooperative working relationships among City departments and other governmental and regulatory agencies; and performs related work as required. The Principal Management Analyst position is a FLSA exempt at-will management position.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
This is an advanced level analyst position in which incumbents conducts difficult, sensitive, and complex administrative and technical work under general direction, where assignments are subject to infrequent review while work is in progress and upon completion. The incumbent serves in a variety of administrative, coordinative, analytical and liaison capacities, as required by the changing needs of the City and as directed by the City Manager and/or Assistant City Manager.

Successful performance of the work requires knowledge of public policy, human resources policy, municipal functions, and activities, including the role of an elected City Council, and the ability to develop, oversee and implement projects and programs in a variety of areas. This position is distinguished from lower-level analyst positions by its assignment of greater or more complex and sensitive projects and negotiations and liaison position assignments, such as finance, budget, grants, contracts and various other administrative functions. Position may provide supervision to Program Staff, Management Analysts, administrative Staff and/or Department interns.

City of Solana Beach

PRINCIPAL MANAGEMENT ANALYST
At-Will
Attachment 3
City of Solana Beach
Principal Management Analyst
Adopted: 04/12/2023 Page 2 of 8

ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS
The following duties are typical for this classification. Incumbents may not perform all of the listed duties and/or may he required to perform additional or different duties from those set forth below to address business needs and changing business practices.
• Creates and implements environmental and sustainability programs and policies, oversees the City’s environmental and sustainability performance, and ensures compliance with local, state, and federal regulations and policies.
• Supports department leadership in studying new and proposed sustainability programs, projecting energy savings and overall program feasibility. Develop methodologies used and document steps taken throughout the data collection and analysis process.
• Serves as the City’s representative for a variety of joint powers agreements and contracts for professional and support services; negotiates and administers agreements for City services, including, solid waste, recycling and organics disposal (SB 1383), County grant agreements and homelessness program service agreements.
• Provides staff support, including preparing of Staff Reports and followingup on actions taken by subcommittees and City Council. • Provides input into the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies, procedures, and work standards for the City; provides input into the development and administration of the City Manager’s departmental budget.
• Conducts organizational, operational, financial, and analytical studies; evaluates alternatives; prepares recommendations and narrative and statistical reports; and implements policy and procedural changes after approval.
• Conducts outreach efforts to internal and external stakeholders regarding general sustainability information including the Climate Action Plan City of Solana Beach
Principal Management Analyst
Adopted: 04/12/2023 Page 3 of 8
programs and mitigation measures, waste reduction, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reductions, community event sustainability requirements and overall sustainability progress.
• Monitors and interprets various external factors, such as economic conditions, new legislation, and state and federal funding changes to determine the impact on City; develops policies, procedures, standards, and ordinances to ensure compliance with applicable lawsand regulations. • Makes presentations to the City Council, and other City commissions and committees; represents the City in meeting with members of community, business, professional, educational, and governmental organizations. • Serves as a professional Staff resource to City managerial Staff. • May direct the work of Staff on a project or day-to-day basis, trains Staff in work procedures.
• Identifies, plans, implements, and evaluates goals, objectives, priorities, and activities within assigned areas of responsibility in a manner consistent with the City’s overall goals and objectives including developing strategies for the successful achievement of such.
• Prepares and directs the preparation of a variety of written correspondence, reports, policies, procedures, ordinances, requests for proposals, agreements, grant administration reporting requirements and other written materials.
• Monitors changes in laws, regulations and technology that may affect City activities and functions; implements policy and procedural changes as required.
• Prepares reports to State regulatory agencies.
• Receives, investigates, and responds to citizen and employee complaints, inquiries, and requests for services.

City of Solana Beach
Principal Management Analyst
Adopted: 04/12/2023 Page 4 of 8
• Coordinates with and assists the business community on education, outreach and compliance with local, county and State requirements. • Acts as the Staff liaison to the Climate Action Commission. • Coordinates the School Crossing Guard program in conjunction with the School District.
• Experience with website administration and social media is preferred, but not required.
• Performs other duties as required.

QUALIFICATIONS GUIDELINES
Education:

Possession of a bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university with major course works in Public Administration, Economics, Business Administration, Political Science, Public Policy, or closely related field. A master’s degree in public administration, business administration or other related field is desirable.

Experience:

Four to five (4-5) years of increasingly responsible administrative management experience involving a combination of any of the following: research, project management, policy analysis, study and analysis of management, budget, organizational, procedural problems and issues, contract, and program administration, preferably in a government agency.

KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS & ABILITIES
Knowledge of:
• Principles, practices, and procedures of public administration in a municipal setting.
• Functions and services of a municipal government.
• Principles and techniques of conducting analytical studies, evaluating alternatives, and making sound recommendations.
• Basic budgetary and contract administration practices in a public agency.

Applicable laws, codes, and regulations.

City of Solana Beach
Principal Management Analyst
Adopted: 04/12/2023 Page 5 of 8
• Principles and techniques of program planning, implementation, and administration.
• Statistical and financial analysis and records management principles and practices.
• Principles and practices of public administration, including purchasing and contracting and the maintenance of public records.
• Principles and practices of management and supervision; the City's personnel policies and Memoranda of Understanding.
• Techniques for making effective public presentations. • English usage, grammar, spelling, vocabulary, and punctuation. • Computer applications related to the work.
• Techniques for effectively representing the City in contacts with insurance providers, governmental agencies, third-party administrators, and employees.
• Techniques for providing a high level of customer service to City Staff, and variety of individuals from various socio-economic, cultural, and ethnic backgrounds, in person and over the telephone.
• Program management, budgeting, and supervisory techniques. • Modern office practices, methods, computer equipment and computer applications.

Ability to:
• Provide accurate interpretations of policies and regulations. • Prepare a variety of reports and analyses, which are written clearly, concisely, and accurately.
• Maintain confidentiality of sensitive information and records. • Analyze issues and make recommendations to resolve administrative and procedural problems.
• Develop written presentations and reports, which include drawing conclusions and making recommendations.
• Establish and maintain effective working relationships with applicants, employees, City officials, bargaining units, and the general public. • Organize own work, set priorities, and meet critical deadlines; use initiative and independent judgment within established procedural guidelines; plan and organize responsibilities so that reports are produced in a timely and accurate manner; exercise independent judgment; and make sound decisions.

City of Solana Beach
Principal Management Analyst
Adopted: 04/12/2023 Page 6 of 8
• Accomplish work with a minimum of supervision and with only general direction.
• Assist directing the work of others on a project or day-to-day basis, train others in work procedures.
• Plan, organize, assign, train, supervise, review, and evaluate the activities and staff of assigned program areas.
• Monitor and analyze current developments and legislation and their implications for the City.
• Prepare clear, concise, and effective reports, correspondence, and other written materials.
• Make effective oral presentations of complex material to diverse audiences as needed.
• Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing. • Use tact, initiative, prudence, and independent judgment within general policy and legal guidelines.
• Work in a team atmosphere and participate on a variety of departmental and Citywide committees to enhance the provision of all City services. • Effectively use computer systems, software applications, and modern business equipment to perform a variety of work tasks.
• Demonstrate an awareness and appreciation of the cultural diversity of the community and work with diverse populations and maintain an inclusive environment.
• Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work.

Special Requirements:
• Possession of a valid Class "C" California driver's license with a satisfactory driving record.
• Incumbents may be asked to travel on City business, using their own vehicle or a City vehicle, and are required to be in the Department of Motor Vehicles Pull Notice Program.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The above job description is intended to represent only the key areas of responsibilities; specific position assignments will vary depending on the business needs of the department.

City of Solana Beach
Principal Management Analyst
Adopted: 04/12/2023 Page 7 of 8
City of Solana Beach employees are designated Disaster Service Workers through state law (California Government Code Section 3100-3109). Employment with the City requires the affirmation of a loyalty oath to this effect. Employees are required to complete all Disaster Service Worker-related training as assigned, and to return to work as ordered in the event of an emergency.

PHYSICAL AND MENTAL DEMANDS/WORKING CONDITIONS
The physical and mental demands herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform these essential job functions. • Mental function: Includes reading, writing, mathematical computations, operating a computer, problem solving, managing multiple projects, calmly handling complaints and problems from irate citizens or contractors, decision making under stressful conditions, and executing assignments with general supervision/direction and within established deadlines.
• Productivity: Incumbents must perform work in an efficient, effective, and timely manner as directed/assigned.
• Mobility: Incumbents require sufficient mobility to work in an office setting and operate office equipment. Ability to sit, stand, walk, kneel, crouch, stoop, squat, twist, climb, lift 60 lbs., and push or pull objects up to 100 lbs. and sit, stand, walk for prolonged periods. • Vision: Vision sufficient to read small print, computer screens, and printed documents, and to operate assigned equipment.
• Hearing: Incumbents are required to hear in the normal audio range with or without correction.
• Environment: Standard office environment with travel to attend meetings or conduct site investigations. Occasional exposure to temperature swings from indoor to outdoor temperatures; exposure to dust from atmosphere and volumes of paper; infrequent exposure to extreme heat and humidity in un-air-conditioned facilities; extreme noise working at off-site locations; mechanical and electrical hazards of equipment; fumes and odors of burned wiring. Work environment is an 80-hour biweekly work period, with unscheduled breaks.

Duties may require working varying hours and days. Work is performed in City Hall and other off-site locations. Work characteristics are both formal and informal; both autonomous and team-oriented; having both routine and variable tasks; with variable pace and pressure.
//
//
City of Solana Beach
Principal Management Analyst
Adopted: 04/12/2023 Page 8 of 8
• Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability to work in an office setting and operate office equipment. Continuous fine finger dexterity to manipulate small tools and equipment; Frequent walking, standing, sitting, side-to-side turning of neck; firm grasp to lift and move equipment; Occasional bending and stooping, squatting, reaching at and above shoulder height, pushing/pulling up to 100 Ibs., twisting at waist, upward and downward flexion of neck; lifting of objects weighing up to 60 lbs.

Infrequent kneeling.
• Other factors: Incumbents may be required to work extended hours including evenings, weekends, and holidays. Incumbents may be required to travel outside City boundaries to attend meetings.

COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # A.7.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance Department
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2023-046 to Increase the Budget for Building Permit Revenue and Professional
Services for Building Permit Review and Inspection
Services for FY2022/23
BACKGROUND:

The City has been experiencing a higher than anticipated volume of Building Permit activity in Fiscal Year 2022/23. EsGil, LLC has been providing building plan review and inspection services for the City of Solana Beach since 1987. The most recent professional service agreement (PSA) with them was approved by City Council on June 9, 2021.

This item is before Council to increase the estimated Building Permit Revenue and increase the budget for professional services that will be provided by Esgil, LLC as the City’s provider for professional building permit plan review and inspection services.

DISCUSSION:

In an effort to ensure that the City continues to provide sufficient and effective services to its constituents for Building Permit services, staff is requesting an increase of $220,000 to the estimated revenue for Building Permits, and a $200,000 increase in the Community Development Department Building Services for professional services to be provided by Esgil, LLC. Recently, the City’s Fire Prevention Specialist resigned from the City to take a position in another local jurisdiction. During the recruitment for this position, which is currently ongoing, additional budget allocation is also necessary to allow EsGil to provide these Fire Inspection services.

April 12, 2023
Building Permit Activity Budget Update

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

This is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Increase in Estimated Building Permit Revenue by $220,000 from $305,000 to $525,000, and an increase to Professional Services in the Community Development Department Building Services by $200,000 from $391,250 to $591,250. This has net impact of increasing savings to the FY2022/23 budget by $20,000.

WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Authorize Staff recommendation.
∙ Do not authorize Staff recommendation.
∙ Provide alternative direction to Staff.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council consider adoption of Resolution 2023-046 (Attachment 1) authorizing the City Manager to increase the Estimated Building Permit Revenue by $220,000 from $305,000 to $525,000 and increase Professional Services Budget in the Community Development Department Building Services by $200,000 from $391,250 to $591,250.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2023-046
RESOLUTION 2023-046

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING BUDGET

ADJUSTMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMIT REVENUE AND

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR BUILDING PLAN

REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has utilized the services of EsGil, LLC (EsGil) to provide professional building plan review and inspections services for many years; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined there has been higher than anticipated building permit activity in Fiscal Year 2022/23;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach does resolve as follows:

1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Manager is authorized to increase the Estimated Building Permit Revenue by $220,000 from $305,000 to $525,000 and increase Professional Services budget in the Community Development Department Building Services by $200,000 from $391,250 to $591,250.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 2023, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # B.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: DRP for 241 Pacific Avenue
(Case # DRP22-014 Applicant: Richard Schrager
Resolution 2023-033)

BACKGROUND
The Applicant, Richard Schrager, is seeking the City Council’s approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) for an interior remodel of an existing residence and construction of a new 316 square foot covered patio in front of the existing residence. The existing residence was originally constructed in 1959 prior to the City’s incorporation and prior to the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance and the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan which require a minimum 40-foot rear yard setback from the top edge of the coastal bluff.

A square footage addition was approved and constructed in 1990 prior to the adoption of the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ) which reduced the maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the property in 2007. Therefore, the existing residence exceeds the maximum allowable FAR and is considered a legally existing non-conforming structure.

The Applicant is requesting the approval of a DRP in order to demolish bay windows that are 11 square feet from both the main and upper levels, renovate the kitchen, bathroom, primary bathroom, relocate/reconstruct one interior and two exterior staircases, install new windows and doors, patch and retexture the existing stucco, replace the roofing materials and construct a 316 square foot attached covered porch in the front of the main level of the existing multi-level residence. The 5,137 square foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The proposed project is below the bluff top redevelopment project threshold(s) as defined by the City’s Certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use Plan (LUP) as discussed in this Staff Report.

The proposed project requires a DRP for two reasons: 1) for development on a coastal bluff top property or on the face or toe of a bluff for which a coastal development permit April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

will be required the California Coastal Commission, and 2) for new construction, including replacement of an existing structure or structural additions to existing development in residential zones where the total of existing square footage plus proposed new square footage of the structure exceeds 60 percent of the maximum floor area allowable under the applicable floor area ratio.

The issue before the Council is whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Applicant’s request as contained in Resolution 2023-033 (Attachment 1).

DISCUSSION
The subject property is located on the west side of Pacific Avenue between the intersection of Hill Street and Pacific Avenue to the south and Pacifica Avenue and Clark Street to the North. The lot size is 5,137 square feet, but the western side of the site (coastal bluff edge) has eroded over time and the current lot size measures approximately 4,937 square feet in total area. The site is currently developed with a multi-level, singlefamily residence with an attached garage.

The existing home consists of a 423 square foot lower-level garage that is constructed right at the front property line, the main floor is 1,884 square feet and setback approximately 25 feet from the property line, and the upper level is 1,258 square feet and is also setback 25 feet from the front property line. The rear 27 feet of the main floor and the rear 8 feet of the upper level are seaward of the 40-foot blufftop setback. The Applicant initially submitted a site plan showing the Geologic Setback Line (GSL) in the current location by calculating shear strength parameters using soils samples from a similar property instead of the project site. After performing the same analysis using soil samples from the project site, the “New GSL” was determined to be approximately 17.8 feet seaward of the “Old GSL” location shown on the plans. The Applicant provided a setback map (Attachment 2) showing the two GSL locations (identified as “New” and “Old”) but requested to use the more conservative GSL location on the project plans. Therefore, the conservative GSL is located approximately 36 feet seaward of the front (east) property line as shown on the following page.

April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

The existing garage and the first approximately 16 feet of the existing main floor and upper floor are located landward of the GSL. The remainder of the home is seaward of the GSL line. The Applicant is proposing to construct a covered porch in front of the southeast corner of the main level, an interior remodel and to relocate the existing staircase in the southeast corner of the lot as well as the staircase along the northern elevation of the garage to allow for the construction of a door. All structural components of the proposed work are landward of the GSL. The project plans are provided in Attachment 3.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ. The project has been evaluated for conformance with the policies contained in the City’s Certified LCP LUP, regulations of the SROZ, and the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) which are discussed further later in this report. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant would be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) from the California Coastal Commission (CCC) prior to the issuance of a building permit by the City.

Table 1, on the following page, provides an overview of the applicable Certified LUP and Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) specific minimum and maximum requirements of the zoning regulations for the development of the property compared to the Applicant’s proposed design. As shown, the proposed height, setbacks, and floor area ratio (FAR) for the proposed covered porch are in compliance with the regulations of the SBMC. ~1
I 1- w• I
I
I
I
L_ ___ _
I
1 STORY
I --, --rt.:,----~~~ I fJOST. POACH b __ l ___ __,
I oa,~ L
,cg H.?f Q7'f.
--- I I
I I I
ffl !I l!h ~ I ii ,i ~ ti ~Iii
"
11 \; ii! SITE PLAN (J)
April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

Table 1

LOT INFORMATION
Property Address:

Legal Lot Size:
*Actual Lot Size:

Max. Allowable Floor Area:
**Proposed Floor Area:

Exceeds Max Floor Area:

Max. Allowable Height:

Max. Proposed Height of
addition:

Overlay Zone(s):
241 Pacific Ave.
5,137 ft2
≈ 4,937 ft2
2,569/2,469 ft2
3,143 ft2
574/674 ft2
25 ft.
13 ft.

SROZ
Zoning Designation:
# of Units Allowed:
# of Units Requested:

MR (5-7 du/ac)
1 Dwelling Unit 1 ADU
& 1 JADU
1 Dwelling Unit
Setbacks: Required Proposed
Front (E) 5 ft. 0 ft.

Interior Side (N) 5 ft. 5 ft.

Interior Side (S) 5 ft. 5 ft.

Rear (W) ft. 22.5 ft.
* Actual lot size is the remaining area of the lot after erosion of the bluff edge. ** Existing square footage of legally non-conforming structure is 3,565 ft2.

PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION
Floor Area Breakdown: Required Permits:

DRP: A DRP is required for 1. Any development on
a coastal bluff top property or on the face or toe of
a bluff for which a coastal development permit
issued by the California Coastal Commission is
presently required. The total of existing square
footage plus proposed new square footage of the
structure exceeds 60 percent of the maximum floor
area allowable under the applicable floor area
ratio.

Existing Lower-Level Garage:

Existing Main Level Living Area:

Existing Upper-Level Living Area:

Subtotal:

Proposed Demolition:

Garage Exemption:
423 ft2
1,884 ft2
1,258 ft2
3,565 ft2
-22 ft2
-400 ft2
Total Floor Area: 3,143 ft2
Proposed Grading: The proposed project includes a 6 yd3 of excavation for the footings.

CTE, Inc. the City’s third-party geotechnical engineering consultant, has reviewed the proposed project design and the geotechnical reports written by GeoSoils Inc. provided by the Applicant (Attachment 4) and has concluded that the project, as proposed, is consistent with the City’s LUP and SBMC geotechnical requirements. (Attachment 5) City Council Resolution 2023-033 provides the full text of the pertinent DRP regulations.

Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the project for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report and Staff’s analysis of the proposed project. It provides the applicable LUP and SBMC sections in italicized text. Conditions from the Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions as it deems appropriate as a part of the Public Hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for an action to be taken at a subsequent Council meeting.

The following is a discussion of compliance with the policies of the LCP LUP as well as the findings for a DRP (as each applies to the proposed project) and a discussion of the development plans and recommended conditions as contained in the attached Resolution.

April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use Plan (LUP):

The City’s LUP applies citywide as the entire City is located within the Coastal Zone.

Therefore, in addition to compliance with the City’s Municipal Code and General Plan, the project’s conformance with the certified LUP is also evaluated.

The LUP contains specific policies, provisions and regulations related to properties located on the coastal bluff including those related to bluff edge setbacks, existing legal non-conforming structures and the removal of permanent irrigation systems located within 100 feet of the bluff edge.

The key relevant policies from the City’s Certified LUP which apply to this project are listed below in italics for reference followed by an analysis of the how the proposed project is designed in compliance with the respective Certified LUP policy:

Policy 4.14: Existing, lawfully established structures that are located between the sea and the first public road paralleling the sea (or lagoon) built prior to the adopted date of the LUP that do not conform to the provisions of the LCP shall be considered legal non-conforming structures. Such structures may be maintained and repaired, as long as the improvements do not increase the size or degree of non-conformity. Additions and improvements to such structures that are not considered Bluff Top Redevelopment, as defined herein, may be permitted provided that such additions or improvements themselves comply with the current policies and standards of the LCP. Complete demolition and reconstruction or Bluff Top Redevelopment is not permitted unless the entire structure is brought into conformance with the policies and standards of the LCP.

Policy 4.17: New development shall be set back a safe distance from the bluff edge, with a reasonable margin of safety, to eliminate the need for bluff retention devices to protect the new improvements. All new development, including additions to existing structures, on bluff property shall be landward of the Geologic Setback Line (GSL) as set forth in Policy 4.25. This requirement shall apply to the principal structure and accessory or ancillary structures such as guesthouses, pools, tennis courts, cabanas, and septic systems, etc. Accessory structures such as decks, patios, and walkways, which are at-grade and do not require structural foundations may extend into the setback area no closer than five feet from the bluff edge. On lots with a legally established bluff retention device, the required geologic analysis shall describe the condition of the existing seawall; identify any impacts it may be having on public access and recreation, scenic views, sand supply and other coastal resources; and evaluate options to mitigate any previously unmitigated impacts of the structure or modify, replace or remove the existing protective device in a manner that would eliminate or reduce those impacts.

The proposed project plans (Attachment 2) indicate that the project will consist of interior remodel of an existing multi-level home that was constructed in approximately 1959 as well as the addition of a covered patio and site improvements. The residence is located seaward of the GSL except for the eastern most 16 feet of the main and upper levels as well as the garage. There is an existing covered patio with a BBQ behind the main level April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

with a guardrail that will remain. No new proposed development is seaward of the 40-foot setback line or the GSL.

The property has required five-foot side yard setbacks along the north and south side yards as well as along the front (landward or east) side of the property. It should be noted that the existing, nonconforming garage on the south side of the home currently extends to the front property line and will remain in place as allowed under both the SBMC and the LUP. No portion of the proposed improvements would encroach into the required fivefoot minimum front yard setback. The existing deck will continue to encroach approximately 2 feet into the required south side yard setback.

The GSL and bluff stability requirements of the LUP are provided under LUP Policy 4.25.

The geotechnical analysis prepared by GeoSoils, Inc. that was provided by the Applicants is discussed further below.

Policy 4.25: All new bluff property development shall be set back from the bluff edge a sufficient distance to ensure that it will not be in danger from erosion and that it will ensure stability for its projected 75 year economic life. To determine the GSL, applications for bluff property development must include a geotechnical report, from a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or a certified Engineering Geologist that establishes the Geologic Setback Line (GSL) for the proposed development.

This setback line shall establish the location on the bluff top stability where it can be reasonably assured for the economic life of the development. Such assurance will take the form of a quantitative slope analysis demonstrating a minimum factor of safety against sliding of 1.5 (static) or 1.2 (pseudostatic, k-0.15 or determined through analysis by the geotechnical engineer), using shear strength parameters derived from relatively undeformed samples collected at the site. In no case shall the setback be less than 40 feet from the bluff edge, and only if it can be demonstrated that the structure will remain stable, as defined above, at such a location for its 75-year economic life and has been sited safely without reliance on existing or future bluff retention devices, other than a caisson foundation.

The Applicant provided a geotechnical analysis from GeoSoils, Inc. that was reviewed by one of the City’s third-party geotechnical engineering firms, CTE, Inc. They confirmed that the bluff erosion rate analysis and related stability calculations provided by the Applicant’s geotechnical engineer and proposed project design are consistent with the City’s Certified LUP policies and applicable SBMC requirements.

The remodeled residence maintains the same rear yard setback as the existing residence and would not encroach further west into the rear yard setback. Therefore, the existing non-conformity would remain and the proposed improvements would not increase the size or degree of the existing legal non-conformity as allowed under LUP Policy 4.14.

Policy 4.26: With respect to bluff properties only, the City will require the removal or capping of any permanent irrigation system within 100 feet of the bluff edge in connection with issuance of discretionary permits for new development, redevelopment, or shoreline protection, or bluff erosion, unless the bluff property owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, or the CCC if April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

the project is appealed, that such irrigation has no material impact on bluff erosion (e.g., watering hanging plants over hardscape which drains to the street).

The proposed project has been conditioned to require the removal or capping of any/all onsite permanent irrigation systems located within 100 feet of the bluff edge.

Chapter 8 of the LUP (Definitions) contains the threshold listed below that is used by the City to evaluate whether a proposed project is considered a remodel or whether it meets the definition of a “Bluff Top Redevelopment” project.

Bluff Top Redevelopment shall apply to proposed development located between the sea and the first public road paralleling the sea (or lagoon) that consists of alterations including (1) additions to an existing structure, (2) exterior and/or interior renovations, (3) and/or demolition of an existing bluff home or other principal structure, or portions thereof, which results in:
(a) Alteration of 50% or more of major structural components including exterior walls, floor and roof structure, and foundation, or a 50% increase in floor area. Alterations are not additive between individual major structural components; however, changes to individual major structural components are cumulative over time from the date of certification of the LUP. (b) Demolition, renovation or replacement of less than 50% of a major structural component where the proposed alteration would result in cumulative alterations exceeding 50% or more of a major structural component, taking into consideration previous alterations approved on or after the date of certification of the LUP; or an alteration that constitutes less than 50% increase in floor area where the proposed alteration would result in a cumulative addition of greater than 50% of the floor area taking into consideration previous additions approved on or after the date of certification of the LUP.

The proposed project will maintain all existing setbacks, is below the maximum building height, the existing residence exceeds the maximum allowable FAR, however, the Applicant is proposing to remove 22 square feet, therefore, does not increase the size or the degree of the existing legal non-conformity. Additionally, as shown in Table 3, the proposed project is below all thresholds listed above and is therefore not considered a Bluff Top Redevelopment project and is not subject to Certified LUP Policy 4.29 which would otherwise require the project, as new development, to be brought into conformance with the LCP.

April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

Table 3 – Project Comparison to Bluff Top Redevelopment Thresholds Structural
Component
Existing Proposed
or
Modified
Percent
Change /
Difference
LUP
Threshold
Exceeded?
Exterior Walls 302 ft. 6 in. 67 ft. 10in. 22% No
Floor Area 3,165 SF -22 SF 0.7% No
Foundation 2,307 SF 252.25 11% No
Roof Structure 2,934 SF 570 SF 19% No
Floor Structure 3,142 SF 555 SF 18% No
The property is located approximately 0.3 miles south of Tide Park Beach public beach access easement and 0.2 miles north of Fletcher Cove Park which each provide public coastal access to the public beach below. As designed, the proposed project would not change the existing public access.

According to the geotechnical report prepared by GeoSoils, Inc. (Attachment 3) the combined 1.5 Factor of Safety and theoretical 75-year bluff erosion line (Geologic Setback Line or GSL) is located approximately 40 feet from the bluff edge and runs through the eastern portion of the residence made up of a bedroom, bathroom, kitchen, living room and basement (family room, two bedrooms and two bathrooms). Because there are no changes to the footprint of the residence east of the geologic setback line, this is informative but does not affect the project as proposed.

The LUP recommends the use of 0.40 feet per year as the default average annual bluff erosion rate unless a site-specific geotechnical analysis indicates a different erosion rate should be used. LUP Policy 4.25 allows for the use of a site-specific bluff erosion rate and stipulates that any existing shoreline protective devices shall be excluded from the slope stability calculations (Policy 4.18).

A site-specific bluff erosion rate analysis was conducted by GeoSoils, Inc., as allowed by Certified LUP Policy 4.25, and determined to be 0.1875 feet per year. This analysis was reviewed and confirmed by the City’s Third-Party geotechnical engineer, Geopacifica.

Development Review Permit Compliance:

In addition to meeting zoning requirements, the project must also be found in compliance with development review criteria. The proposed project requires a DRP for development on a coastal bluff top property that requires a coastal development permit issued by the CCC and for replacement of an existing structure or structural additions to existing development in residential zones that exceeds 60 percent of the maximum floor area allowable under the applicable floor area ratio.

The following is a list of the development review criteria topics:

1. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses

2. Building and Structure Placement

3. Landscaping
April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

4. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas

5. Grading

6. Lighting

7. Usable Open Space
The Council may approve, or conditionally approve, a DRP only if all of the findings listed below can be made. Resolution 2023-033 (Attachment 1) provides the full discussion of the following findings.

1. The proposed development is consistent with the general plan and all applicable requirements of this title, including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.

2. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria set forth in subsection F of this section.

3. All required permits and approvals issued by the city, including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

4. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

If the above findings cannot be made, the Council shall deny the DRP. The following is a discussion of the applicable development review criteria as they relate to the proposed project.

Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses:

The property is located within the MR Zone. Other nearby properties are also located within the MR Zone and are developed with one and two-story, single-family residences.

The project site is currently developed with a split-level, single-family residence.

The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the MR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and 17.12.020. The property is designated Medium Density Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residences developed at a maximum density of five to seven dwelling units per acre. The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ and within the Coastal Zone. The project has been evaluated, and could be found to be in conformance with, the regulations of the SROZ, which are discussed further in this report. As a condition of project approval, the April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

Applicant would be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.

Building and Structure Placement:

The Applicant is proposing to remodel the interior of the existing residence, construct a new 316 square foot covered patio in front of the southeast corner of the main level, and relocate two exterior staircases. The existing staircase along the northern elevation of the garage would be reconstructed approximately 12 feet west of the face of the garage in order to allow for a door to be added to the northern elevation garage and provide an area to store the garbage and recycle bins. The existing staircase that provides pedestrian access to the main level entry area will also be relocated in order to construct the new covered porch south of the existing garage. The covered porch would be 13 feet above the existing grade. A new gate and guardrail are proposed to enclose the front yard area.

The interior remodel scope would include the removal of one bay window of 11 square feet from both the main and upper levels, the renovation of the kitchen, bathroom and primary bathroom, relocate/reconstruct the interior staircase, the installation of new windows and doors, and to replace the roofing materials.

After the removal of the bay windows the total proposed floor area would be 3,143 square feet, which exceeds the maximum allowable FAR of 2,569 for a lot of 5,137 square feet by 574 square feet. As previously mentioned, the existing residence was constructed in 1959 and significantly remodeled in 1990 prior to the adoption of the SROZ, which subsequently reduced the maximum allowable FAR of the property.

Neighborhood Comparison:

Staff compared the proposed project to properties within the surrounding area located along both sides of Pacific Avenue, Hill Street and Helix Avenue as shown on the map on the following page.

April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

All of the properties are located within the MR Zone and also located within the SROZ; therefore, they have a maximum FAR allowance using a tiered calculation of .50 for the first 6,000 SF of lot area, 0.175 for the next 9,000 SF, 0.10 for the next 5,000 SF and 0.05 for the remainder of the lot. The maximum allowable FAR for this 5,137 SF lot is calculated as follows:

0.50 X 5,137 SF lot = 2,569 SF
The 35 properties evaluated in this comparison are developed with existing homes that range in size from 320 square feet to 6,718 square feet, according to the County Assessor records. It should be noted that the County Assessor does not include the garage, covered porch area, unfinished basement, or accessory building area in the total square footage. Accordingly, the building area of the proposed project has been calculated for comparison purposes by deleting the area of the proposed garages, the covered porch, and ceiling height over 15 feet as follows:

Project Gross Building Area: 3,543 ft2
Delete Garage: - 423 ft2
Project Area for Comparison to Assessor’s Data: 3,120 ft2 Table 2 below is based upon the County Assessor’s data and SanGIS data. It contains neighboring lot sizes, the square footage of existing development and the maximum allowable square footage for potential development on each lot based on the original lot \
\
April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

size not the current (gross) lot size that in many cases has been reduced in size due to coastal bluff erosion.

Table 2:
# Property Address
Lot Size in
ft2
(GIS)
*Existing ft2
Onsite
(Assessor’s)
Proposed /
Recently
Approved
ft2
Max.

Allowable
ft2
S.R.O.Z.

Zone
1 261 Pacific Avenue 4,798 3,023 2,399 MR
2 255 Pacific Avenue 4,346 3,018 2,173 MR
3 249 Pacific Avenue 4,352 1,364 2,176 MR
4 245 Pacific Avenue 4,826 3,284 2,413 MR
5 241 Pacific Avenue 5,137 3,004 3, 120 2,564 MR
6 235 Pacific Avenue 4,307 1,382 2,154 MR
7 231 Pacific Avenue 3,801 2,751 1,901 MR
8 225 Pacific Avenue 4,170 1,949 2,085 MR
9 219 Pacific Avenue 4,623 3,443 2,312 MR
10 215 Pacific Avenue 4,874 2,578 2,437 MR
11 211 Pacific Avenue 4,375 2,763 2,188 MR
12 205 Pacific Avenue 3,749 1,850 1,875 MR
13 201 Pacific Avenue 5,147 3,122 2,574 MR
14 200 Pacific Avenue 7,446 4,646 3,253 MR
15 208 Pacific Avenue 8,009 4,353 2,527 MR
16 232 Pacific Avenue 7,228 2,664 3,345 MR
17 238 Pacific Avenue 5,054 3,046 2,813 MR
18 239 Hill Street 6,973 3,086 2,978 MR
19 244 Pacific Avenue 5,626 2,370 2,641 MR
20 255 Hill Street 5,956 1,670 3,247 MR
21 252 Pacific Avenue 5,282 2,656 2,641 MR
22 259 Hill Street 7,412 4,461 3,247 MR
23 0 Pacific Avenue 5,153 0 2,577 MR
24 234 Hill Street 5,331 2,168 2,666 MR
25 250 Hill Street 10,214 6,718 3,737 MR
26 288 N. Helix Avenue 3,952 320 1,976 MR
27 222 N. Helix Avenue 3,526 1,342 1,763 MR
28 218 N. Helix Avenue 3,275 2,352 1,638 MR
29 212 N. Helix Avenue 3,568 2,349 1,784 MR
30 210 N. Helix Avenue 3,549 2,306 1,775 MR
31 137 S. Sierra Avenue 8,458 3,301 3,431 MR
32 147 S. Sierra Avenue 4,258 3,385 2,129 MR
33 201 s. Sierra Avenue 4,403 1,288 2,202 MR
34 207 S. Sierra Avenue 6347 4,140 3,061 MR
35 211 S. Sierra Avenue 4,012 832 2,006 MR
36 217 S. Sierra Avenue 6,946 2,231 3,166 MR
* Some of these structures exceed the maximum allowable floor area for the lot because they were built prior to the adoption of the SROZ, which reduced the maximum floor area for the lots.

April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

Fences, Walls and Retaining Walls:

The SBMC allows for fences and walls or any combination thereof, to be no higher than 42 inches in height as measured from existing grade within the front yard setback.

Fences, walls and retaining walls located within the rear and interior side yards are allowed to be up to six feet in height with an additional 24 inches that is 50% open to light and air. In addition, one architectural feature around a walkway can be proposed as long as the area of 8 feet by 12 feet is at least 50% open to light and air.

The plans indicate that a 5-foot 6-inch tall gate is proposed to be constructed with the first

2.5 feet solid and the top 3 feet 50% open. This gate will be located on the north side of the garage and will provide pedestrian access to the relocated staircase along the northern property line. An existing 6-foot-high fence is currently located along the north and south sides of the property. A 5 ft 6 in. fence that has the top two feet open to light and one pedestrian gate along the eastern property line are proposed in conformance with the maximum fence height regulations for fences within the front yard setback. A condition of approval has been added to the resolution that indicates that any proposed onsite fences, walls and any proposed railing located on top or any combination thereof shall comply with applicable regulations of SBMC Section 17.20.040 and 17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).

Landscape:

The project is not subject to the water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter

17.56. According to SBMC Section 17.56.040, the regulations apply to modified irrigated landscaped areas that exceed 500 square feet. The Applicant is not proposing any new irrigated landscaping.

The LCP Policy 4.26 requires the Applicant to cap or remove any permanent irrigation systems onsite unless the bluff property owner demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that such irrigation has no material impact on bluff erosion. A condition has been added that if there are any permanent irrigation systems that they shall be capped or removed.

Parking:

The existing attached 423 square foot garage that is located at the street level provides vehicular access to the northeast corner of the residence. The garage will remain as it currently exists. The existing on grade staircase that abuts the face of the garage follows the northern elevation of the garage. The Applicant is proposing to reconstruct the staircase approximately 12 feet back from the face of the garage in order to add a door to the garage and a location to store the trash and recycling bins behind a proposed gate.

The existing two-car garage is located within the front yard setback however, it was constructed with the necessary building permits and is considered legal non-conforming therefore the property qualifies for the 400 square footage exemption for required parking in an enclosed garage.

April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

Grading:

The proposed project includes a total grading quantity of 6 cubic yards of excavation for the footings of the proposed patio/patio cover and the relocation of two exterior staircases.

Lighting:

A condition of project approval includes that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

Useable Open Space:

The project consists of a covered patio addition and remodeling of an existing singlefamily residence with attached garage and associated site improvements; therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are not required according to SBMC

17.20.040.

Property Frontage & Public Right-of-Way Improvements:

The existing property frontage is improved with concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk. If approved, the Applicant will be required to improve the existing concrete curb along the entire property frontage. An Encroachment Maintenance and Removal Agreement (EMRA) will be required for the existing planters, retaining walls, and stairs in the public right-of-way.

Public Hearing Notice:

Notice of the City Council Public Hearing for this project was published in the San Diego Union Tribune more than 10 days prior to the public hearing. The same public notice was mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project site on March 31, 2023. As of the date of preparation of this Staff Report, Staff has not received any letters, phone calls, or emails from neighbors or interested parties in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed project.

In conclusion, if the Council can make the required findings, the proposed project, as conditioned, could be found in compliance with the requirements of the Certified LUP, Zoning Ordinance, and the General Plan, and could be found to meet the findings required to approve a DRP.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption) of the 2022 State CEQA Guidelines which is an exemption for minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities including additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, or 2,500 square feet, whichever is less.

April 12, 2023
DRP22-014 Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Ave.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff recommendation adopting the attached Resolution 2023-033 • Approve Staff recommendation subject to additional specific conditions necessary for the City Council to make all required findings for the approval of a DRP. • Deny the project if all required findings for the DRP cannot be made.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

The proposed project meets the minimum objective requirements under the LUP, SBMC, is consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2023-033 conditionally approving an interior remodel to an existing multilevel, single family residence as well as the relocation of two exterior staircases and the construction of a covered porch area at 241 Pacific Avenue.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2023-033

2. Bluff Setback Map

3. Project Plans

4. GeoSoils Reports

5. CTE, Inc. Letters
RESOLUTION 2023-033

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT TO

REMODEL AND ADD A COVERED PORCH TO AN EXISTING
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 241 PACIFIC AVENUE,

SOLANA BEACH
APPLICANTS: Richard Schrager
CASE NO.: DRP22-014
WHEREAS, Richard Schrager (hereinafter referred to as “Applicant”) has submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning), of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on April 12, 2023, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the hearing and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

2. That the request for a DRP to construct an interior remodel and the addition of a covered patio to an existing two-story, single-family residence with an attached garage located at 241 Pacific Avenue is conditionally approved based upon the following findings and subject to the following conditions:

3. FINDINGS
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City’s General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential, which allows for single-family residential development with a maximum density of 5-7 dwelling units per acre. Further, the proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan Consistency: The proposed project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the City’s certified Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan including key policies related to bluff edge setbacks for new development.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The proposed project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SBMC

17.20.030 and 17.48.040), which delineates maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR), Permitted Uses and Structures (SBMC Section

17.20.020), which provides for uses of the property for a single-family residence. Further, the proposed project adheres to all property development regulations established for the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and cited by SBMC Section 17.020.030 as well as the specific development regulations of the Scaled Residential Overly Zone (SROZ) cited in SBMC Section 17.48.040.

The design of the proposed project is consistent with the provisions for minimum yard dimensions (i.e., setbacks) and the maximum FAR, maximum building height, and parking requirements. Prior to building permit issuance, the project will be reviewed for compliance with the landscape regulations as established by SBMC Section 17.56.

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

17.68.040.F:
a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses: The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and where feasible, complimentary to existing and potential development in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Site planning on the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects, Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

as well as protection of the property from adverse surrounding influences.

The property is located within the MR Zone. Other nearby properties are also located within the MR Zone and are
developed with one and two-story, single-family residences. The project site is currently developed with a single-family residence.

The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the MR Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and

17.12.020. The property is designated Medium Density
Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residences developed at a maximum density of five to seven dwelling units per acre. The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated
neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the SROZ and within the Coastal Zone. The project has been evaluated, and could be found to be in conformance with, the regulations of the SROZ, which are discussed further in this report. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant would be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhances their intended use.

The Applicant is proposing to remodel the interior of the existing residence, construct a new 316 square foot covered patio in front of the southeast corner of the main level, and relocate two exterior staircases. The existing staircase along the northern elevation of the garage would be reconstructed approximately 12 feet west of the face of the garage in order to allow for a door to be added to the northern elevation garage and provide an area to store the garbage and recycle bins. The existing staircase that provides pedestrian access to the main level entry area will also be relocated in order to construct the new covered porch south of the existing garage. The covered porch would be Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

13 feet above the existing grade. A new gate and guardrail are proposed to enclose the front yard area.

The interior remodel scope would include the removal of one bay window of 11 square feet from both the main and upper levels, the renovation of the kitchen, bathroom and primary bathroom, relocate/reconstruct the interior staircase, the installation of new windows and doors, and to replace the roofing materials.

After the removal of the bay windows the total proposed floor area would be 3,143 square feet, which exceeds the maximum allowable FAR of 2,569 for a lot of 5,137 square feet by 574 square feet. As mentioned before, the existing residence was constructed in 1990 prior to the adoption of the SROZ which reduced the maximum allowable FAR of the property.

c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area.

Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

The project is not subject to the water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. According to SBMC
Section 17.56.040, the regulations apply to modified irrigated landscaped areas that exceed 500 square feet. The Applicant is not proposing any new irrigated landscaping.

The LCP Policy 4.26 requires the Applicant to cap or remove any permanent irrigation systems onsite unless the bluff property owner demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that such irrigation has no material impact on bluff erosion. A condition has been added that if there are any permanent irrigation systems that they shall be capped or removed. d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways.

Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view, to the extent feasible, by existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.

The existing attached 423 square foot garage that is located at the street level provides vehicular access to the northeast corner of the residence. The garage will remain as it currently exists.

Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

The existing on grade staircase that abuts the face of the garage follows the northern elevation of the garage. The Applicant is proposing to reconstruct the staircase approximately 12 feet back from the face of the garage in order to add a door to the garage and a location to store the trash and recycling bins behind a proposed gate.

The existing two-car garage is located within the front yard setback however, it was constructed with the necessary building permits and is considered legal non-conforming therefore the property qualifies for the 400 square footage exemption for required parking in an enclosed garage.
e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

The proposed project includes a total grading quantity of 6 cubic yards of excavation for the footings of the new porch addition and the relocation of the exterior staircases.
f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding areas per SBMC 17.60.060 (Exterior Lighting Regulations).

A condition of project approval includes that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.
g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.

Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

The project consists of remodeling of an existing single-family residence, attached garage, associated site improvements and the addition of a covered patio therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are not required according to SBMC

17.20.040.

III. All required permits and approvals, including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits, have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

All required permits are being processed concurrently with the Development Review Permit.

IV. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicants obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

The Applicant is required to obtain approval from the CCC prior to issuance of Building Permits.

4. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. The Applicant shall pay required Development Fees Public Facilities Fees, as established by SBMC Section 17.72.020 and Resolution 1987-36.

I. The Applicant shall pay required Fire Mitigation, Park Development and Public Use Facilities Impact Fees, as established by SBMC Chapter 15.60, Chapter 15.65, Chapter 15.66, and Resolution 2018- 147.

II. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City Council on April 12, 2023, and located in the project file with a submittal date of March 10, 2023.

III. Any proposed onsite fences, walls and any proposed railing located on top or any combination thereof shall comply with applicable regulations of SBMC Section 17.20.040 and 17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).

Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

IV. The Applicants shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of a building permit by the City.

V. The Applicants shall remove or cap any/all permanent irrigation systems onsite unless the bluff property owner demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, that such irrigation has no material impact on bluff erosion (e.g., watering hanging plants over hardscape which drains to the street).

VI. All new bluff property landscaping shall consist of native, noninvasive, drought-tolerant, fire-resistant, and salt-tolerant species.

VII. Any new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of SBMC 17.60.060.

VIII. All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities that render them detrimental to the surrounding area.

IX. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all times when feasible. If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicant shall ensure construction vehicles are parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on Pacific Avenue and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.

X. The Applicant shall connect to temporary electrical service as soon as feasible to the satisfaction of the City. The use of gas-powered generator(s) during construction activity is discouraged and shall be limited only to selective use at the discretion of the City.

XI. Pursuant to SBMC 17.68.040 subsection K, the signed final development plan shall be the official site layout for the property and shall be attached to any application for a building permit for the subject property. Any subsequent revisions or changes to the final development plan as approved by the Council will require an amendment to the approved DRP.

B. Fire Department Conditions:

I. OBSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION: All
roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width during construction and maintained free and clear, including the parking of vehicles per Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

the 2019 California Fire Code Chapter 5 Section 503.4 and 503.2.1.

II. ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers
and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background, and shall meet the following minimum standards as to size: 4” high with a ½” inch stroke width for residential buildings, 8” high with a ½” stroke for commercial and multi-family residential buildings, 12” high with a 1” stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers per the 2019 California Fire Code Chapter 5 Section 505.1.

III. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM-ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system designed and installed. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted as Deferred Submittal and approved by the Solana Beach Fire Department prior to installation per the Solana Beach Municipal Code Title 15 Building and Construction Chapter 15.32 Fire Code Section 15.32.230 Section 903.2.01.

Sprinklers will be required due to the significant modification to the change of stairs and roof.

IV. CLASS “A” ROOF: All structures shall be provided with a Class “A” Roof covering to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department and per the 2019 California Building Code Chapter 15 Section 1505.

C. Engineering Department Conditions:

I. The Applicant is required to obtain an Encroachment Permit in accordance with SBMC Section 11.20 for the below frontage improvements being done in the public right-of-way. The frontage improvements shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the proposed project:
a. Construction of a new concrete curb and any damaged sidewalk panels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer along Pacific Ave. b. Construction of the concrete stairs.
c. Construction of the sidewalk underdrain pipes discharging the runoff from the planters.

Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

II. The Applicant shall record the Encroachment Maintenance Removal Agreement (EMRA) with the County of San Diego prior to the release of the Grading Bond and Security Deposit. The EMRA shall be recorded against this property for all private improvements in the Public Right-Of-Way including but not limited to:
a. Underdrain pipes.
b. Concrete retaining walls.
c. Planters.
d. Concrete stairs.
e. Pavers at the driveway approach.
f. Landscaping & irrigation.

III. All construction demolition materials shall be recycled according to the City’s Construction and Demolition recycling program and an approved Waste Management Plan shall be submitted.

IV. Construction fencing shall be located on the subject property unless the Applicant has obtained an Encroachment Permit in accordance with chapter 11.20 of the SBMC which allows otherwise.

5. ENFORCEMENT: Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the above-mentioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

6. EXPIRATION: The Development Review Permit for the project will expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicants have obtained building permits and have commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the expiration date of this Development Review Permit may be applied for pursuant to SBMC 17.72.110 subject to City Council approval.

7. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT: The Applicants shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicants of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own Resolution 2023-033
DRP 22-014 Schrager Residence

defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, the Applicants shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicants regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Applicants shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicants.

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally, the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 12th day of April 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk W.O. 8278-A5-SC DATE: 02/23 SCALE: 1" = 10'
Plate 1a

RE-REVISED

BLUFF RETREAT MAP

ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
This document or efile is not a part of the Construction Documents and should not be relied upon as being an
accurate depiction of design.

BLUFF EDGE

OLD GSL
(RECOMMENDED)
F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT
40' SETBACK

FROM BLUFF TOP
0 GRAPHIC SCALE
10 5 10 20
1" = 10'
N
DRAFT
X
X'
B-1
TD=25'

GSI LEGEND
B-1
TD=25'
X X'

NEW GSL (NOT

RECOMMENDED)
F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT

17.8'
2 STORY
L_ ___ _
I ~
I ~ co
IUJ
CJ)
UJ
0 163
.
:? \~ :::> C> __.I
-.;;t- co
BASE MAP FROM:

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA CA
102'
1 STORY (BELOW) I GARAGE (BELOW) I

SITE PLAN
----------------------------------,
s APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING

WITH TOTAL DEPTH IN FEET
....,.__..,., - APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION t------~----,------, IMPERVIOUS AREA DIAGRAM:
• 1.A',)SCN{IJP:·;J. D I O 402Si i
:an:- ,'.mm,, ,J1 _1,1Sf o _ 1 r __ I.:, .tj l!-Oi!.lLOIASftu:d 4s,~:~~_L_n io 1'739:,sr 1iOT~HfiiAfi~ ( :iffSt I ~ -- -I fJ ]J.u1Sf7
II.HE >, 0 //LIJ,,_,,Q<,t,ci(tXil'.'JSCIE '.OCH~,2:STOT·' EXJrtJGMPF/JOOSJ..0,:A
NOTES:
·ALL PRIVATE OUT008A LIGHTING SHALL BE SHADED AND ADJUSTED TO FALL ON THE PREMISES.
-STATE HEALTH ANO SAFETY CODE SEC 17921.9 BANS THE USE OF CHLORINATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (CPVC} AND CROSSUNKED POL YETHEl YN (PEX} FOR lNTE.RiOR WATER SUPPLY PIPING.
-LAVATORY FAUCETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.2 GALLONS PER MlNUTE@ 60 PSL ANO MAXll,~UM FLOW RATE OF 1.2 GPM@60 PSl(CGBSC 4,303.1.4.1]
-MAX FLOW RATE OF SHO'.VER HEADS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE@) SO PSL ANO MAX!MUM FLOW RATE OF 1.8 GPM@ 80 PSI.
-PERMANENT VACCUM BREAKERS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH ALL NEW HOSE BIBS -PROVIDE UL 1AA LOW FLUSH TOILETS.
-PROVIDE SA!R CHANGES PER HOUR FOR BATHROOM AND LAUNDRY ROot-.1 VENTILATION -LIGHTING IN BATHROOMS SHALL HAVE ALL HIGH EFFICACY LUMlNAIRE AND AT LEAST ONE

LUMINAIRE MUST BE CONTROLLED BY A VACANCY SENSOR
. SEE MECHANICAL PLAN FOR REOUIRED ROOM EXHAUST
SEE POWER PLAN FOR SMOKE DETECTORS & CO2 ALARMS
APPLICABLE CODES 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC) 2D19CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)
2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMCJ
2019CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPCj
2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC)
2019CAllFORNlA FIRE CODE (CFC)
2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
2019 CAUFORN!A GREEN BUILDING CODE
2019 BU!LDING ENERGY Eff!CIENCY STANDARDS

STRUCTURAL COMPONENT TABLE
LfITftRWlliS
I ;"yJft;tF£~
f'r.c:::..rn
C'lM-.:.:.rlE
PROJECT TEAM•
ARCHITECT:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:

ENERGY CONSULTANT
APPLICANT.

APPi ICANTREPRESENTATIVE·

PROJECT DATA
SITE ADDRESS.

APN:

LOT AREA:

BUILT-lN:

HISTORIC:

EXISTING USE
PROPOSED USE:

LEGALDESC:

OWNER

BASE ZONE
OVERLAY ZONES:

OCCUPANCY:

CONSTRUCTION TYPE.:

BUILDING HEIGYT:
> OF STORIES EXISTING
¢. OF STORIES PROPOSED
PARKING:

EASEMENTS & ENCROACHMENTS:

H~IGHT LIMIT:
8tJ,LDINC HEIGHT:
8CSSTOPS:

FIRE DEPT. REO'MENT:
.1/-SCOPE OF WORK- PERMIT \ • 1 HE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING INTERIOR WINDING MARTIN 1\RC!llTECTURE
J TlMOTHY MARTIN AIA
233:3 ST ,\TE STREET STE 1 DO
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
760.729 3470
Curtis P,,~erso!"I SE 5S29, LEED AP
Patterson Engineering. Inc.
928 For1 Stock Ion Drive, Suile 201
San Dieg::i, CA 92103
Office .858-605•0937
GALLANT ENrnGY CONSULTING
508 W. Mission Avenue Sult& 201
Escondido. CA 92025
760-743-5403
760-480-6246
M:i.rkGal: .. int
RlCK SCHRAGER
241 PACIFIC AVENUE
SOLANA 9EACH, CA 92008
[email protected]

CHANDRA SLAVEN
CHANDRASLAVEN@GMAILCOM
241 PAClf'IC AVENUE. SOLANA BEACH CA 92037
263-312·12
5,137 SF (.12 ACRE)
1952
YES ~NO
SlNGlE FAMILY DWELLING
S!t~GLE FAMILY DWELLING

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
STATE OF CAUFORNlA, AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 14 !t~ BLOCK23 OF SOLANA BEACH, IN THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, COUNTi' OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA. ACOORD!NG TO MAP THERE OF NO. 17,!9,

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAN DIEGO COUNTY. MARCH 5, 1923.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION THEREOF OR

NOW LYING BELOW THE MEAN HIGH TIDE LINE OF THE
PACIFIC COAST.

RICK & LAURA SCHRAGER

2.! 1 PACIFIC AVENUE
SOLONA BEACH, CA 92075
M9-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
SR 02- SCALED RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONE
R3
V-8
20'-0"
2 STORY BUILDING
2 STORY BUILDING
NO. OF SPACES REO'JIRED: 2 PROVIDED: 2
NONE
2s•.o· • 2 STORY
1G'-O" • STORY
22 .o• · 2 SiOHY
11'·6· , 1 STORY
NONE
PROVIDF au1LnING f,DDR[SS NU!.\BERS

VISIBLE & LEGIBLE FROM STREET

LSTAIRCASE AND REPLACING IT WITH A CONVENTIONAL SWITCHBACK STAIRCASE, REMODELING THE MASTER BEDROOM AREA AND CLOSET. REDUCING THE SIZE OF BEDROOM 3 ON THE MAIN

LEVEL, ADDING A POWDER ROOM AND PANTRY, REMOVAL OF A SMALL PORTION OF ROOF AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LANAI ADJACENT THE EXISTING GARAGE. OTHER THAN THE LANAI. NO AOOIT!ONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED. NEW FOUNDATIONS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE LANAI,

AN EXPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NEAR THE STREET (PACIFIC AVENUE) AND EAST OF THE GSL SETBACK. RETROFITTING OF THE EXISTING FOUNDATION IS PLANNED AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS EAST OF THE 40-FOOT SETBACK LINE. THIS WILL CONSIST OF SIX FOOTINGS FOR NEW POST TO FACILITATE FLOOR FRAMING ADJUSTMENTS AND TWO FOOTINGS FOR SHEAR WALLS FOR SEISMIC UPGRAOES.

AREA SUMMARIES GROSS FLOOR AREA SUMMARY LOT AREA 5,137 SF

NET LOT AREA
~
;ROSS FLOOS AREAS,MMAR• --·--7 :XJSI\'CHJJNtP.?Offl7 - --- 1gt~s~'3

MAX ALLOWABLE GFA
GARAGE AI.LOWANCE

MAX ALLOWABLE
5, 137 x .50 • 2569 SF
400 SF
cX!STW1\ILlfffRlt:')tLGRUS~(lt!ClUObPH.\I/Il)J1 12~St ' 9JSfJ1'fiGAPJ£f(lllQSS _J_ni:r
l lOTIUXC,IIISSf,Jliill""' - J5c5'
f:X ~/lB~Yleh -11SF
::X.lltlllclol ·11Sf
101/cEX GR0SSFlOOilll',EA10ii;~Ml J5<3Sf
I
2,569 SF

PROPOSED FLOOR AREA/ SOFT BREAKDOWN
(SEE SHEET A2,3)
EXISTING F!AST FLOOR LIVING AREA

FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA TBR

EXISTING SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA

SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA TBA

EXISTING GARAGE

GARAGE ADDITION

COVERED & ENCLOSED PATIO

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU)

SUBTOTAL OF FLOOR AREA
OFF- STREET PARKING EXEMPTION (2 SPACES)

TOTAL PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
PROPOSED LANA! (OPEN 3 SIDES) 316 SF (NEW)
1,884 SF
·11 SF
1,258 SF
·11 SF
423 SF
OSF
0 SF
0 SF
3,543 SF
-400 SF
3,143 SF
103 N. 78 OT E
(
I
I
D
I
EXISTING SINGLE FMKY REs;DENCE
241 PACIFICA AVENUE SOLON, BEACH, CA APN t 263-312-12 ~1 I I
1• 1 I
\:

EXIST. PORCH
\
I
I

SITE PLAN
SCALE t/8"=1FT

SHEET INDEX
cu
C1.2
EX1.1
EX1 2
EX1.3
EX3 1
EX3.2
EX4 I
EX5.l
DU

01.2 DL3
DS.1
D6.1
a. !fn.,
( D7.2
'\.137.2
ALO
Al.1
Al.2
A1.3
A2, 1
A2.2
A2,3
A3.1
A3.~
A4.1
A4.2
A5, 1
AG.1
A6,2
AB 1
Sl.O
SL1
s2.o
s2.1
S2.2
S2.3
s2.-i
S2,5
S3,0
S3,1
S3.2
S3.3
S4.D
S4,1
S4.2
M1.i
M1.2
T-24
E1.1
E1.2
E2.1
E2.2

SITE PLAN
6MPPLAN
EXISTING fJ.AIN LEVEL PLAN
EX1STING UPPER LEVEL PU\N

EXISTING GARAGE LEVEL PLAN
E>'.ISTING ELEVATIQt;S

EXISTING ELEVATIONS
EXISTING BUit.DiNG SECTlONS

EXISTING ROOF PLAN

MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN
UPPER LEVEL DEMOLITION Pl.At~

GARAGE LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN
ROOF DEMOLll lON P~N

DEMOLITION ISOMETRICS
AL TEAED EX1ERIOR \'/ALL PL.ANS

ALTERED FOUNDATION PLANS
Al T. FLOOR AND ROOF FRAMING PLANS
GcNERAL NOTES

MAIN LEVEL PLAN
UPPER LEVEi PLAN

GARAGE LEVEL PLAN
M•\IN LEVEL DIMENSIONAL F'l.AN

UPPER LEVEL DIMENSIONAL PLAN

FAR FLOOR PLANS

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

BUILDING SECTIONS

BUILDING SECTIONS
!=;OOF PLAN

MAIN LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
UPPER l.EVEL REFLECTED CE!LH,'G PU,N

DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULE

TYPICAL STRUCTURAL NOIES

TYPICAL SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES
1YPICAi. FOUNDATION OElt'\ILS

TYPICAL FRAMING DETAILS
iYPJCAL SHEAR-WAl L DET/\ILS
TYPICAL SHcAR TRANSFER DETAILS

DETAILS

DETAILS

GARAGE FOUNDATION PLAN

MAIN LEVEL FOUNDATION PLAN

MAIN LEVEL FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
UPPER ROOF FRAMING Pl.AN
FOUNDATION DETAiLS

FRAMING DETAILS

FRAMING DETAILS
MAIN LEVEL MECHANlCAL Pl.AN
UPPER LEVEL MECHANICAL PlAN
TITLE 24 / CAUf. ENERGY CALC'S

MAIN LEVEL LIGHTING PLAN

UPPER LEVEL LIGHTING PLAN

MAIN LEVEL POWER PLAN

UPPER LEVEL POWER PLAN
i
.J,.

LlJ
0:::
:)
1-
u
LlJ
~6
z <(
UJ z
o:S
1-4 0
(/) rJl
UJ w~
ct. ~ LU
ct. ~ LU u
:c
~~ Cl..
u ~ V) N
!::; <(
I,_;
u <(
0::: C
<( :e
ro
:a:

E
F
i 1~21-21
5•18·22 LJ: B·28·22
j:, 10-10-22
A 11-1-?2

SHEET NO,
NORTH Cl.1
!ATTACHMENT 3J
STORM WATER QUALITY NOfES CONSTRUCTION BMP'S
THIS fKOJECf SMAU.. COMPLY WHH All CURRENT REQUIREMENTS Of THE 5T,ffE. rERMIT; CAUFORNIA REGIONAL. WATER QUALITY CONTROl BOARD { SDRWQCB), SA.N Dll:GO MUNl:CIPl'\L STORA\ WATER PERMIT. THE C!:TY CF SAN DIEGO LA.NC DE;VEI.O?MENT CODE. ~ND THE STC~}A WATER ST,f,NC>A'-<DS M,o\NJAL PRIOR TO l'\NV .SOit. t>ISTVRSANCE, TEMPORARY SEOIMENi CONrROLS SHAU .. BE INSTALLED BY THE CONT'RACTOR OR. QllAL.IFIED PERSON("S) .A.5 INDICATED BElOW I) AU. REQ\JIAEMENT"S 01' THE CITY Of ~N DIEGO STORM WATER STANOARDS VNIJAL MUST BE INCORPORATE{) INT'O THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Of THE PROPOSED GRADING/IMPROVEMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE A.PPROVl:;D STOKM. W,.,_TER POLLUTION PREVENTION Pu'.N ( SWP~P) AN:)/C)A ',1>ATER 0 01.LUTION CC"ITROL PLAN ('NPCP) FOR CONSTRUcttON LEVEL BMP'5 A.ND. IF APPLICABLE, Tl-IE ST®M WATER QUALITY MANAGE».ENT PL.AN (SWQMP) FOR POST -CONST'RUCT!ON BMP' S
Z.) THE. CONTRACfOR SHAW.. INSTA\.L r'.ND AVi.lNf,'JN ALL STORM CMIN Ir-.1.ET PROTECTION, INt.ET i'~OTECl"!ON IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT' OF WM N.UST ae TEMPOft.ARIL.Y REMOVED PRIOR ro A RA.IN EVENT' TO 8',JSUAE' NO FLOODING O(CIJRS AND REINS T A.LLED A.FTER IUIN l'S OVtR
a) AU. CONSTRUrnoN BM.P'S SHALL BE IN.STALLED ANO PROPERLY MAINTAINfl:) THROIJ&HOVT THE DUR,ffION OF CONSTRIJcnON
"') THE CONTRACTOK SHALL OM..Y GRADE, INCLUOING CL~RING &, GRU88IN'1, ARE.J.S FOK WHICH THE CONTRACTOR OA:

QuAUF!EO CONiAcr Pi:RSON CAN ~OVIOE atOSION ANb SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES 5) TH~ CONrnACTC;'l: IS R~5PONSIBLE FOR ENSURING iHAT ,(lL SUB,CONmA.CTCO:S A"''t SUPPL!ERS ~RE AW,i,RI: OF ALL STORM.W,o\TER 8Mi' .SAND rMPt.tMENT 5UCH MEASURES fAllURE:: ro COMi"LY WITH Tt!E APPROVE() S'NPff'/WPCP WILL A:ESUl,.T IN TME I$$UANa; OF CORRECTION NOTICES. CIT J\TIONS, CIVIL PE:NALTIES AND /OR STOP WORK NOTICES 6) THE CONTRA.CTOR OR QV,J,LIFIED CO~T'ACi FERSON $HJ.LL SE RES?ONSBLE fOq Clf,o,,-..UP OF ALL SILT [)E31US ,O,Nt) Ml.JD ON AFFECTEt) ANb JI.DJACENT S'ffiEET(S) A"-1() WITHIN STORM DRAIN SYSiEI,\ bUE TO CONSTRumON VOOCU:'S/ EQUIPMENT ANO CONSTRUCTTON ACTIVITY AT TJ-te' ENC OF EAC'M WOAX DAY 1) THE CONTKACTOR SHAU. PROTeCT NEW ANO EXISTING STORM 'NATER: CONVEYANCE 5YSTEM.5 FA.OM SEOIMENTATION CONCRETE RINSI: OR. OTHER CONSTRUCT.ION AEL,rret> OEWS ,',Nt) Ois.lMAR&ES WITH THE A.Pf'l<OPIU:,'.TE IMP' 5 TH,n A.RE ACCEPTABLE TO T"E aTY RESitt;NT" E~INEEi=t AND A.S INDICATED IN THE SWPPP/ WPCP 8) THE CONTRACTOR OR QUALlFlEb CONtACf PERSON SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE Q.&R [)£BR.IS, SILT. AND MUI> FROM ALI. l)ITOi€5 ,',.?-.'D SW,.1.LES ~IDA TO ANO WITHIN 3 SUS!M:SS DA.VS J.FT€R !:A.CH RAIN EVENT 0~ PiUC'>:: TO THE NEXT RAIN EVE!\.'T' WHlCHEVEK rs SOONER
9} IF A NON src~M.WATER DISCHARGE LEAV!:S THE SITE THE CONTRACTOR SHAU. IMMEClIATEL'Y STOP HIE ACTlVITY ANb REPAIR THE DAN.AG!:, THE CONTR,.;CTOK SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY RESIDENT ENSINEER OF Tr<E DISCH~RG,E t~OR TO RESIJAUNG CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ,j,N'f AN[') AU.. WASTE MATEIU.AL, SEDIMI:NT, ANt DEBRIS fAOM EACH NON STOAM WATER DlSCHA.AGE SHAU. RE RE'MOVEO FROM THE STORM O'lAIN CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANO PROP'ERLY OISl'OSEI> OF BY THE CONTRACTOR lO) EQJlPMENT FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHAU. Sf Mt'4;0E AVAIi.ABLE ,ff A.LL TlMES ALL. N:;CESSARY Mo"\TERIA~ SHAW. ae STOO:PILED ONSITE ,o,T C.0NV94EN1" LOCATIONS TO FACILITATE RA?tt> t>EPL/:1'fH.ENT OF C0NSTqUCT10N IMP'S WHEN RAfN ts IMMINENT U) TH£ CONTRACTOR SH,,_U. RESTOIRE AN0 M,,_IT.AlN ALL ER05tCN AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 8MP'S TO WOAK.tNG ORbE'A YEA.A.

ROVNIJ

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
IZ) THE CONTIUCTOR: SHALL INSTALL AOOITIONAL EROSION A.N:) SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES DUE TO UNFORSEEN OR0JM5fA..NCES TO PRVENT NON 5l0RM WATER AND Si:DIMEt\o/T•lADEN CISCHA.RGES 13) THE CONTRACTOR St,,AU. ae RESPONSIBI.E AND SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT PUBLIC TRESPASS O,'JT"O AREA.S WHERE IM.POU!'.:) WA.T:RS CRi:ATE ,', HAZAtlOOUS CONDITION I-4) ALL EflOSION ,A.NO SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PROVIDED PER THE 1\PPROVED SWF'PP/ WPCP SHAI.L 8E INSTALLED AND MAINT-1:!NEO ,I.LL €RDSION AN() S~DIMENT CONfRLS FOR INTI:RIM CONDITIONS SHA.LL !!E PROPERLY DOCUMENTED AND ANO INSTALLED TO TnE SATISFACTION Of THE aTY RESIDfNi ENGINEER 15) AS NECESSARY THE an ReSIOENT ENGINEER SHALL 5'HEDULe MEffiNGS FOR THE PROJECT TEAM (Gf:NER,',L CONTRACTor;:: , QUAUFIED CONT A.CT PERSON, EROSION CO,"fl'ROL SUBCONTRCTOR IF ANY, ENGINEER OF WORK OWNER/ DEVELOPER, AND THE CITY RESibENT ENGINEEll) TO EVALUATE THE ADEQUA.cY Of THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT'

CONTROL MEASURES AND OTHER SMP' S RELATIVE TO ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 16) THE CONT~CTOR Oft QVALlFIED CONTACT PERSON SHALL CONDUCT VISUAL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTAIN ALL 8MP'S DAILY ANO AS NEEOEO VISIJ"L INSPECT!ONS AND MAINTE.NA.NCE OF ALL BMP' S Sf-lALL BE CQNOUCTEO BEFORE, DVIUNG AND A.FTER EVERY R,o,IN EVENT EVERY 24 HOURS DURING ANY PROLONGED AAIN EVENT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MA.INT AIN AND REP,O,IR ALL SMP'S AS SOON AS POSSlBLS AS SAFETY ALLOWS
1n CONSTitt.JCT!0"-1 EN'ftt.ANCE' AND EXIT AR€'A
TEMPOR,o,RY CONST~UCTION t;XITS A.NO ENTRANCES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCOROANCE WITH CA.SQA. FACT SHl;ET TC· toR OR CAL TRANS fACT SHEET TC-01 TO ?AVENT TRACK!NG Of SEl)IMEN'r AND OTHER POTENTIL POLLUTANTS ONTO PAVED SURFACE'S AND TRAVEllED WAYS WIDTH SHA.LL RE 10 FT OR THE MINIMUM NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE VEHICLES AND EQJIPMENT WITHOUT BY-P,\SSIN.'; THE ENTRANCE (a) NON $TORM WATER DISCHARGES SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY MANAGED f'ER: THE an, OP' SAN OIEGO MUNICIPAL. CODE CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 3. bIVISION 3 ~ STORM WATER MANAGEMENT ANb DISCHARGE CONTROL~ S_IQBM 'N/1 TFR CONSTRUCTION B M P'S
is>fE~e;e~ltt5a1"'i~lb ~~~ L~~&i~ :~iSl:c~~:1~1~l(E~f~~R6'€flr'rf0"' oF 19) ALL sroa PllES Of UNCOMPACTED sou. A.Nt)/OR BUILDING MATERIALS THAT ARE wrrnoeo 10 BElEH UNPROTECTHGREATER THAN SEVEN CALENOAR DAYS ARE TO ae r,90V1DlclWITH r ROSIWANDSEDIM.ENT CONTROlS, SUCH SOll'S!ST BE PROTECTED ~rn DAV WREN THE PROOASIUTY OF RAIN IS 40% Oil GREATER
EROSION CONTROL BLANl(ETS
PRESERVE EXISTING VEG€T ATION
FIBER ROI.LS
SlLi" l=l:NCES
PERIMETER CONTROl.S

CONCRETE WASHOUT
MA.TEIUAL STa:l:AGE
STOC~ll.E MANAGEMENT

SANITARY FACILITIES
SPILL P-ROTECT!ON
INST-4.LL ON A.NY bISTVRBED .SITE WITH SLOPE ~EATER TH,<,.N J:1 SEE CASQA M.ANUAL EC-7 Fo=t t'Jt;IAILS
EXISTING VEG-ET.ATION SI-MU. se PRESERVED ,4.S MUCH AS POSSI!31..E see ,~sQA. ,',\A.Nl,JAL e:C•i1' FOQ: 0€TA.lt..S USE PIBER A:01..L.5 ON SLOPES i::EYED INro GAOUNti
SEE C,',SQA MA.NI.JAL SE~, fOR DETAILS
INSTAL ALON8 CONTOURS TO ~EEP SCl>tMCN1" ON SITE see CA5qA 1'ANVAl SE -1 FOR l)ETAII,.$ use G.:iA.VEI.- ~AGS "'ROVNb DRAIN INLET POINTS SEE CASQA MANUAL SE -6, SEtO POR bETAILS PROVIDE SEtlIMENT CONTROL AT LIMTS Of soa. DI.STURBA.N'.:E SEE CASQA MANVA.t. SE -i, SE-5. 5E-6, SE-8. SE 14 f~ DETAILS CONSTRUCY WA.SHOJT ON SITE SEE CASQA. MANUAl. WM-8, WM·J fOR DETAILS PREVE"IT POlLUTANI MSHARGE FROM M.,J.TERULS CIELIYEREC A.NI) STOAEt, ON StTE SEE CASQA MANUAL WM-l, WM•2, WM-◄ FOR DETAtLS
COVER ANO ST ABIUZE STOCKPILES, PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS see CA.SQA MANVA.I.. WM-3 FOR bET AILS HAZAADOUS WASTE AND MATERIALS SHALL BE ~PT lN Cl.OSEO CCJliEREO COMNTAINERS 5EE CASQI\ MANUAL NS-80 NS-9, NS~10 PROVIDE 5.-\NITARY FACILITIES~ f'ERIMETEA CT SITE SEE CASQA MANIJAt. WM-9, WM-10 FOR OETAlWi see CASQA MANUAL WN,,.,Q"QA Cf:TAtLS
20) A CONCRETE NA.SHOUT SHI\LI. BE PROVIDE() ON ALL PROJECT WHICH AAOF'OSE THE C:ONSTiWmON OF ii.NI CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE TO BE POURED IN PUCE ON11-1ESHE SEE CASQA MANUAL WM.-8, WM-3 FOR OETAII.S r
'
-ex·,usm·r,,n-cf_;r-l"AfFC: .,~rna. r.,1 hO'JT • ... ru:: 'I.Em-1 wPPCn; 21) $I6N SHA.LL llE INSTALLED AbJ.-\CENf TO CONCRETE WASHCLJ"t FA.ClLITY ro INFORM EQU!PMENi OPEIMTOAS TO UTILIZE PROPER FAaLITIES
FOR COMPl-.::rE' OETAILS SEE' CASQA STORM.WATER QUAUTY HA.NDBOOIC. CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEME"-IT WM~S 22) .ALL EROSION/ SEDlMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHAU, 6E MAINTA.INeb IN WORKING ORDER AT All Tf'.iES. 23l»t~rf~~~tJs9\1a~TJ~~ fe&~:M0T~~Tf~~~rA~tITY MU.ST BE PROVIDE EROSION CONTROl 81.1\Nle'.ET ON TEMPORARY CUT SWPES DURING WINTER MONTHS PER CALTRM"5 Mt\J<I.JAL S~CTION SS-7 >~~JJs1"T~pg;~11"e11e1~ ~i;.~i1,~A~~ ,~g~n~tb~lt!WrecrED ElA.GGED MATERIALS SHAl.l :!E PLACED ON Ml.LETS A.ND UNDER COVER FOR COMPLETE DFTAlLS SE:E: CASQA STORM WATER QUAUTY HANl)800K MATERIAL STORAGE ANO SPIU. PREVENTION WM-1. WM.J, WM•4 25>s1°ms ~N~~~s=tlfJf1
~~ ~M~amr~~Ji'if~'r AIN SOUD WASTE
1 STORY
EXIST. PORCH
EX!ST!t.G SIM3LE FAMILY RESIDENCE
2STOOY
EX,3T1NG Sll:GLE FA\'Jl Y RES,DENCE
'
I 103' N. 78' 07' E.
(

EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
241 PACIFICA AVENUE SOLONA BEACH, CA APN#2~312-12
2STOAY I
SILT FENCE :an~; WX)I.' J'.1$11¢','GWITH
WW.~l>U"f'Ollfft:lft~
,,,IM.{/'!;:.:>11M.1'''-'',',C:ll(,,'.1Ji'OJ"
'.V-Y-J.:SIJFFOOT~ENCI:

SANITARY WAS MANAGEMENT

BMP PLAN
SCALE 1/8"=1 FT
CHECK DAM QPV.:s$1GS
•._,-,,,--,,-,~-- ::n"l'_"::_TI !,!'--,-?¾<
~------
' NOTE:

RtIDf:'!.'jJCAfl~','rffiJ,.l,i.',":ITT!il.%.~:':/NSfS:':'l.l'i\Hi 10il(HDfffllGc
LEGEND
(- flf£CflfM0:D?J.ltQ
,mu,:,irnrr.,_m!1//
t=Jfm~ff:ah
•_;~;ijtl!!~PROTF~
liAA\lli.lill'l:ITEtilill
GlP.LlORMm.HS
ii3f!!Rf.ui,~SfAJ.LuAAI
SfIDITAUiITC1.1
00',lllWJiS
vJ
NORTH
·-'
~6
z <!
LU z
0 ::5
1-1 0
Cf) VJ~
LU w
0::: ~
0::: ~ LU<!
(.!j ~
::r:
~~ Ou ~ CJ) rJ
~I
:::) 00 Q
I- 0 .,,. 0
"' N
u '" ~ '?
lJj <!; c;,
u "' I- "O '?
<i. cc 1---j "' "' ~ co
I ...... "' "'
e
8 '"
...
= ul ci. u -u
a:::: C: 0 "'
<( ~ :=: ro -~
~ L ;:,
u,
E 0
i= ~
en
z ~
" 1---j en
~ "'
""
cc,
~,
<(· "'
11·21-21
5-18-22
&8-15-22
"' .. ~ ""
'? -5
"' ... "' "' "' .5 a
'° t:
"' "'
5 ~@
O E -·;::

R
""
'?
"'
~
a
"'
"'
SHEET NO.

Cl.2
I
L
_j ;----=-·-i 1;
( ( / i : r----J---' I
,@,,-'._I i I I i
'\8,/ ,ItI

I, I I I
\i!I ,p
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fl RICK TERRACE
I
I
I
I --t-1
' I IIT , II

I FAMILY ROOM
~.
---"~I-~
: :/
'-,_ ~-0.. "'
'' ~-- --~ "-
E_lSbSTING - SIN - Gt E c.£AMJ1.Y RESIDENCE
1 STORY -
E)<;ISTING_ SINGLE FAMIL y RESI_Qj;_NCE
,mo"' I -
I
J:llNING
ROOM
103' N.76 OTE.

CMUftfl:f
NORTH
I
I
I
[,I
I'' Ii
~ ii
I
GARAGE
BELOW
---- :=_41
EG83U A -- I f<ul§'._
31"@1:i.·
-7~-r:.._:~:;=±-J-~R~!:.-
::!STING MAIN LEVEL S AREA CALCULA EXIST. MAIN LEVEL ____ - TIONS - 1,884 SOF~ I
rfcC?ifi
'rC:CIJI
I
I I
I
SCALE ; ,4.=1 FT
6 UJ
u~
z UJ
UJ co
o~
1-i z (./) :5
LUO
~ V)
~ u.i
LU~
~!
:r: ~ uu
(./) ~
. 1>21·21
,_L8•15·22
/4\ 12-5-22

SHEET NO
EX 1.1
~\ @I('~\)
:c \~
mlmm 10 ~?:S~ :n ~:~~ ,0 c::l'oc:I~
t-:$:=8 ► ei1zm JJ ~-i::o m £:~~ >
"'15:i~ mr r ~
~1;i (,/Jl,/J!f) 0 ~ ~:S ~ IB
m ~
xa
.
~~
N
1--t
~
1--t
~
.z IG1
le
(f)
0 ~
i ~,
21:

I
I
I
-0
-0
m
;o
r
~ m
r
~ -
4,J'-0"~ -
~ GSLSETB;..GK ---- ?:SlEAABL\JfFREl
,(0'05 ____ _
I
~ /'
I
/
lf 1
- :.;
I
I
I
I
I /
,~-------------------~
~ ~J
1- - -_- - - - -- -~ -- -
I 1§
I Ii
I Ii
I
I
I
11 I ---- - +II/// // 4'_) / /F/
_,,-J /1/
/'
t-0
;;::
4'__) I
!
::;
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I
~;~
\
\
\
\
\
\
\~ I
g
/0 \
I
I
I ~ \ i \
I \
I
I
I
I
I \
I \
;;::
~ ~ ~ z f. z
m
--~
~
!co ;rn
0 8
;;::
"'
m·
WI~
7 ~
L
-7
: I
: I
I
I
: !
I
~
~
I
_,J
~
I
I
I
I
"'--i__ I
I
ij
z
~t
l'=l I m
I
I
I I
~ 1 - ---- I \ I -~- / \ ---- ,---===---,y I'&;
I , '[ --a- L , - £<-::-- -,, -~-- - ~ rI
I
I
I
J
~)lk.FL!>a!ScTtlACK
-1 _.'!1.~1l~P,OORT~ __J
I
I
" "- ___ _/ /
_ _!!-01A_!:Wi'A,!,EGIJ!~S-~K _ _ -•M- 1 _ ~
ACLOWAELE ISfftOO~ INCREMENT Al SETBACK
(PERH200S0011')
[;,,~
o,-
__'., r{, u,-
1\lN
NL
__

MARTIN M ARCHITECTURE
Tim Martin A.I.A.
2333 State Street Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008
760-729-3470 (0) 760-729-3473 (F) 858-349-3474 (C)
[email protected]
I I 1-I--©
I
M,C '" E - - _ I

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE., SOLANA BEACH CA
I
I - -JI
I
I
I,
\ L __
\
I 103' N. 78' OT E. 1R@2· 1 T(j" 12"
1R@c·
i ·1 (JJ 1S.5
1R@e"_ !
31@13"
1R@5"
2R@O
..,..,, -~------------ _______ _,_______ --~--------+------ - -----=~---~--,-- 5-0L / \\( UP ,
--+ ------ / -- -L - - - - J~----=-------=--~---=-~-t_~-~~:n:::n:i:=:::::=----t-1 (
\
\
7 -----'1=02'---'-1,. 7L9TE
E:X41

MAIN LEVEL ABOVE
\

ENTRY PORCH
µi:1·
..L -
::::
_Gt;f:lb_GE_
~
------ iY
---------1:~o I
II I _iJ
_ __,__
'--
'
I I

I CONC PATIO I I
I PlAN1ER I
~lW8SO I I ewa4.s·
i! i PLANTER p
'
I 1'11"5" i lW83Jll" i
(swi3.3R' ; BWB2Jl'
PLA.NTFFl.

EXISTING GARAGE LEVEL

SIDEWALK

SIDFWALK
--==---------- -------- NORTH SCALE 1/4"=1FT

GROSS AREA CALCULATIONS
CX\ST GAHAGE AREA = 423 son
PACIFIC AVE.
6 UJ ::c
u u
<C z LJ.J
UJ co
0 <C
z 1-1
(./) ::i
UJ 0
tX (f)
tX LU
::i
UJ z
UJ
~ ~
u
..... J: LItl u <C
(./) 0.
..-1
¢
N
11-21-21
5-18-22
/1\ 8-15-22
SHEET NO.

EX 1.3
m(/) x~ --;
'm Ix
'1--1
I 1--1
z IGJ
m
15 z
(./)
i'51
!I~
21 I;,, - 'P'-11-t
~-N
o,roN)r{)N (\.:H\)~
(./)
0 C
-I
:r:
m
;
0 z
]Nf'IAill]JO~
[2] ' l:--_
~I I II \
~I I II \
SJ]
[CS: SJ]
WN
m= h:C:::s::J1 , 11 \ ,1 l I I
L
It
~i fl~i. l:?i
~NllAiti~l;JdR> i.ii;- "-.,.....,,...

MARTIN M ARCHITECTURE
Tim Martin A.I.A.
2333 State Street Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008
760-729-3470 (0) 760-729-3473 (F) 858-349-3474 (C)
tim11<>martinarchitccture.com
m
;
0 z
;,:,
m m
0 1~-
-- - ! 111 ! ij 1T ll I I :;-:-c==:J 3Nl1Arn3<!00d
\
.~ ""_:_,i,
"'!. H1
, • .!.,
•;9
!
________ _
!! ii' ' \
•r· \ ''' '.. :-.= =\11 --,= =\ --- \
--
.. -,!J .-- lb __ =~ __ _ IL •~c-~- 7 _ 1 .. ' r
__ \J L ~J) \
------ I' n
- ---.-1 ,.f 1:
r I 1 \ I I •q I I
,.
-
-·----
i
I
I,
'I I.
:1
I
11 Ii
lj
I
1,
I•
-· ~i--+--1-----'--.LI
_ _,____________j ii
\ !
I I~ I g
I~ ). 1~
--~ll-~-1l ::~ ~21 '£~
~g C2]g C::i'.;2
m Im IP'
,,_
"' ~-
- (_;,,,Ii' - I Q,_.7
(j)

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE., SOLANA BEACH CA
I \
. I~
1~
o-,gt:11~
I
!
-L
m
0 1--1
~
z
G>
m
r
~
1--1
~
0 12
I (I)
ril / ~1
men
X rn ---l
Wl
N
i' ,,,1 ~,
:'.ii I
1::. - q,::: 9 ...... N "'"'~ Ri l:l~
3 ~
l
al
;:(
'-t
I
~
"'
-"- 3;m:iJ.\£3~
f
z
0 ~ :r:
m
r
~
;
0 z
r
1;
r' I~
,!
I~
1~
=
-1
- ~ ·---· '" - -····· ?'J'1U\£3e0Yl

MARTIN M ARCHITECTURE
Tim Martin A.I.A.
23~~ State Street Suite 100 Carlsbad, CI\ 92008
760-729•3470 (0) 760-729-3473 (F) 858-349-3474 (C)
[email protected]
i~
!m
I~
'm
i
....
~
0 lz
c·;nAJJ1' ... )lfd
~
i~
.JJ~ -··----
I
I
Ill Ii Ii),

1. I ' I I I' II ~
k
r
'\
'l
:\□~~--~
1~
3,1r:\.Hl3d0!:!d

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE., SOLANA BEACH CA
11 I\
'\
\
II
I!
i'
I
~\\\ i§ I ~ \) ~11~,,
I\~
1----1
~
~ z
G)
OJ 'c
i:=
0 1----1
z
G)
(/)
m IQ
~1~_/
~ (/) ~
<::1 ',
~~ ""
...j::I.. ~ .
t-'-
17' - q:it,n7 -~"' "'co- 1\.) l\:.ll\.)
"'"'-
1l
~
.111~
Mrr1~ lu~I L-:-T 1 I - 31mAlli3,J~
:ill=- I
'fiWITi
·=m::::=
'=Ill
'II= =I 11 ~m
11 =l·l·I· ill···· 1·
~ s; ~ Ill gi
I:
=I l[
ill
1=
i)JJ
::TIT Mm
]n
II= ..
~~=-u11!gffi!gffi!#ffiWm
-,,,=111=111=111=111= . •-:1 , ,=:, ' '~WmJM
~ill
"'
~ t-·-
"' [111::::::::;:::1
Vl
m
9 0
z
OJ
~
~
~
~
'i
I
II ..... /.J
f7
fl:
()
~
- - - - - - - "3w1Al\H~lld-
~a
MARTIN M ARCHITECTURE_
Tim Martin A.I.A.
2333 State Street Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008
760-729-3470 (0) 760-729-M73 (F) 858-349-3474 (C)
[email protected]
Vl
m
9 0
z
)>
G)
~ ii q~
m
--31tl,°i:tl3d0Si
11-------------111\
\
IC::: "3jJ
DI
_____J L;~.

I I I l's Ii 1~ It /l
ll --•----- --~ - a••--- ::•mAl\:13.:iOlld

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE., SOLANA BEACH CA
_j_
I
I \ 18'.B'T.P.1038:
f-Ril

FLAT ROOF
I
I
t/4' /FT. I
~-
L \
\
J _ 103' N. 78 DTE ___;;;;:._;_;; ----
I
~
- ::::: -=- ::--- -- ~- ' - - j_ --- - - - -i '
_.f![O" f.P.1105.[L
1 1 /4' !FT. I

EXISTING HIGH ROOF
(FLA1 ROOF W1PARAPE1J
-Jill£-
\
UPPt:HLEVl:L
FXT,Wt,JlS
1l
II
II
ii
))
( (
II
I' ,I
\✓ _/ EXISTING ROOF PLAN
NORTH
z
J
<(
u
UJ :r::
u u
z <
LU
UJ co
0 <(
z .......

CJ) :5
UJ 0
O'.'. Vl
O'.'. w
::>
UJ z
~ UJ
~
u
..... ::c LL.
..... u u
<(
c.n 0..

M
-;!"
N
i 1-21-21
J..,8-15-22
SHEET NO.

EX 5.1
I
~I
L
)
I
_(_
;j/
j/ '/ I
I
B Ai
,J; I \p
I
BRICK TriRI-IACE
I
I
I
D.
'~
@
i
,,,
" 5
i
\'
I\ I;
=
),. I
·.~£] I
\~---
I
\
EXISTING SINGLE.FAMILY RESIDENCE
2STORY )
103' N. 78' 07' E
I
CVEN PPTTi'iY I
BEDROOM 3
~ I
II ,:

FAMILY ROOM
,tJK@H
f
' ENTRY -"-'"":"
~
-------
-~ l \ 0
_j'XISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
1 STORY \
NORTH
1A@2"
k"
'T
l-4' I
1 LEGEND
1 STORY
BELOW
1T@12'
lR@U"
[email protected]"
1 R@6"
~0 ~
'\ ~
I ~
0 .•
I
I
I
I
GARAGE
BELOW
WALL
NUMBER

WALL MATRIX

RETAINED ALTERED

I WAULENGTH WALL LENGTH
OVERALL ~//.LL MftJN l!:1/El· TOTAL LH,GTH 197-8' iJ,\
A 15'-Z' 26'·0' &
21'-D' 3'-2'
11'·" a-ll'
D 5'-0' a-o·
2a-1r a.a•
2E'-8' 'j.l)'
G 48'-4' ~-0' &'
4'-6' a-o·
TOTAL 152'-6' 2'' 2"

OVERALL WALL MATRIX
FLOOR I RET~NED ! ALTERED
LEVEL W/.LllENGTH i WALL LENGTH ':XISlil,I; WAL'.S ,J RE~N WAllSTOBEREl/iJVED
OPG~. TO BE FllL'D
1 TOTAL OVERALL WALL LENGTH. TOTAL LENGTH 370'-ll
! MAIN LEVEL· I 152'-ll' 38'·2'
FLOOR AREA iO BE ,Ell,(IVEJ lJPPERlP/El- I i1l-1G" 2~-2' GARAG: LEVEL- i 31'·2' 3'-6'
TOTAL- I :Ol-6' 6i'-10'
PERCENTAGE I 82% cJ.::,, :,1 1 ~~~~ __ _/'""'-... __ /

MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN
SCALE 114"~1FT
TOTAL

WALL LENGTH
41'·2'
24'-2'
11'-4'
5'-0'
za-6'
1S'-ll'

57.4•
4'-5'
19J-ll'
TOT/.L
WALLLENGiH
1~a.a·
13~-0'
4(1-3'
3)0-l'
<(
u
lJ.J :c
u u
z <C
UJ
lJ.J co
0 <C
z .....i
(./) ::i
lJ.J 0
~ (fJ
'
~ LU
::::i
lJ.J z
l!) UJ
<( ~
~ u
:c
-
u...
1-t
u u
<C
(./) a.

T""i
<t"
rJ
11-21·21
J:,_ 8-15·22
& 11-7-22
SHEET NO.

D 1.1
I I
L __
\
I
\
I I
11 1'
Ji
I
I 1
EXIST. Fl~T ROOF
LG"V,'EAU.VELBfaOW
102 N. 7€ OT E
i
I
I ii ,,~~-
M.BEOROOM
/
I
---tI
I
,:,,I [\
i \
11 1/
BEDROOM2 I cl ~ ~aAl&illiX..
--, J
I

11. I
·,
I
" / " /
'!O:.NW~L; / " / " " / ' / ' / " / "
NORTH
- ,_ -
1,lo
I
6-6
A!,i
I
I
1·6
I Ill
ir J '
I ,~
'\1
WALLS TO 8fn:IIOVEG
7 I"' q
;,:
::,
~
""

FLOOR MATRIX

RET AINEJ ALTERED
FLOOR AREA ! FLOOR ;REA
80SF 230,F

WALL MATRIX
w:tL I QETAINED I ALTERED
NUMBER I WA1LENGTH ! WALL LENGTH
I 22·-& ;s·-s·
1&.[
TOTAL

FLOORAPEA

1.038,'

TOTAL 'I
WALLLENGTti ,
·-1---·--l-_L __ .-J.-__ :-fr ___ c.;(r
25'·. .·5'
1:2-1!)' 16'-2

UPPER LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN
<(
u
UJ :r:
u ~ z LU
UJ co
0 <(
z
1-1
Cf) :s
UJ 0
ct'. (J)
ct'. LU
::,
UJ z
w
~ ~
u
:c
-
u..
t.i u <(
Cf) c..
..-t
N
"'"
1 :-21-2;
. 1,8-15-22
x: 11-7·22
SHEE1 NO.

D 1.2
I
I
L \
\
r---r-=
I I
I
I
I
I
L _ _, __________ _ I 7
I
L
I s--0•SiSS
I
4--- 102' N. 78' 07~ __ _
I
f
\
(
\

EXISTING

MAIN LEVEL ABOVE
\
I r~r, ~-' ,:i i
r
I
I
l
'-.
(
I
I
I
)
__ _j__
(1)
NORTH
[illQj[J
EXISTING WALLS JO REMAJ/l

WALLS JO BE REMOVED
Ol'GS. iO'EFlllE"
FlOOR AREA TO BE ifMO\/l:D
...£L 790'
ll!c-l--+Hl--t---t--+UP ,
, 6T@12· I I 6R@o·
1 [email protected]~crom• :I
I

WALL MATRIX

PACIFIC AVE,
WAl..l. I AEfft!NED ALii:RED ! TOTAL
NUMBER WAll LENGTH WALL LENGTH i WALL LENGTH
OVEll,l~l GARA~E LEVE'.- TJT~, lENGJU 4G'-8'
IT-0' 3-6' 20'-6'
20'-8" 2C3•
20'-6'
'J_, 2G'-8'

GARAGE LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN
SCALE 1/4"= 1 FT
6 llJ :I:
u u
z <!:
w
llJ cc
0 <C
z ~
c.n ::5
w 0
a::: ti)
'
a::: UJ
::;)
w z
LU
~ >
<!:
u
:c
-
u..
u
-
u
<C
c.n 0..
..-I
,;;t'
N
11-21-21
5-18-22
,:'h 8-28·22
.Ji 11"7-22
SHEET NO.

D 1.3
j
_J 1~ I
I
ii
ji
L \
\
\
\
\
\
\
_; +RD
I I )LoWEfilEVEllXT.WALLS
,,.,-· I "1
11 I
r
/ I I
; I i
,,.•11-T.I

LOW ROOF
I ; 114' !FT.!
sl
I
I
L.
\ 102 tUB QLE. ___ _
NORTH
'II
II
))
((
: LEGEND i ' _J
O?G',. ;JBE',,:.ED
//
/
/ GARAGE ROOF -•"' -- BMIYI
I
I
Ii
I I
11 , I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
i 11
, I i
·. · .. I 1
----- ',.1 I
'' :]:
------. I
'
z
:::

ROOF MATRIX
RETAl~cD ALTERED
ROOr A~:A I ROOF ARE!
rnm

ROQF AREA
l HGHR00f l535Sf I ~'H
----~
ROOF DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE 1/4":1FT --~------
6 UJ :r::
u~
Z LU
UJ a::i
0~
~ ::i
Cf) 0
UJ t/)
ct:
w ct: :, UJ z
UJ
~~ a: 8 :c Ubs i
LI.J
a::
::)
1-
u
w
Ir-I
I
u
0C C
<( :e
ro
~i
z
r-1
~ <(
~
,-!
~
11-21·21
LbB-28-22
SHEET NO.

D 5.1
LEGEND
DEfv10LITION ISOME-l"RiCS
NEW FRAMING PER STRUCT:<.A.L

9. 25 .18- SUBMITTAL
~
I
I
I
I
\
j
I
I
\
I
I
\
\
I
1 ~ I
I
I
)
(
I
)
(
\
\
I l l
_1J2UI' ,r(;_,
I i I
L, I..: ======::.J,-
4-•--------20-s··----
@
□
~~L~RIL-1
WALL I TOTA'. I
1 1 f,':''lffi 'V/,\1.'_'.S•l{;fri
1 I 20-c I
8~~~t-i
i 4 I zo., I
GARAGE FLOOR PL,A,~Nw(~EXI=STI'-"'N'-'-'G:.1.}_---1..! s:.::ua:c.-TOc....TN.'-'!_S_l-<1_·t'__, G) ----20-6"----
3-0
r-·r.::===·n!.A9c'![:i==~-
'-----~~-----'
'.1J
D
□
f-- _}t_Ll_Wi.Tljl~ ·---j w;.__ l iQT;,_ ! t.· I Nl',1iiiil I wALL'.EkGTe I WA.l'.E11Gt' i I 2ii·' I o.: .
2 ; ;;.s· i "~ I -3 I ~-fl 7 ~-ij
10' I
GARAGE FLOOR PLAliJ.EROPQS.fQ)_..;;su;:.ca...;.·:..c·,,'-'-,_s1_-'_.' _____ 3-0_,_·~ I
/
I I

MAIN FLOOR PLAN (EXISTING)
13 i SIJB-TOTN. I

WALL MATRIX
I TOTI: I Ft: I 1 W/LLLENJTh I Nt-1.LlH,GTr.

I 18-! [ £.2·
W~LU./~JRIX I l'IAJ,~ 1 TG;A!. i t\UM€~- ! i,•'·.LLH,3:"1 I f--1--1--2~-' ~ I . 2 , ,.4· 1
~~
3 I 4-E I
s-+ ~1 , I 1,., I
I 1 1 ,14· 1
a·t 1B-£7
~-=er~~~
L:0_1 _21-0'_d
UPPER FLOOR PLAN (EXISTING) 1 sua-TC .. !L / 13~-c:_:~ ~

EXISTING PLANS

PROPOSED PLANS
I
EXIST:NG WALL MATRIX I
!O'Al I
NML:~;Grn 1

PPOPOSFD WALL MATRIX
I PP"" fc()(',
.Ml
TQTJ!._ ~~T
NM.L'.:\t.illi WA!.l.:'~Gfri
8?2 I 3,~lf I
50 ~ RULi: CALCULATIONS
:XJSTl!,3 WALLS:
1"• G!JK' 81~ .f
tu! 1.'NN mnF 1:1; Uff:: i3B< J ft iOTAL:YJ5Wt2 4'2.frlF tJ 6
z <C
LU z
0 :5
1---1 0
(/) l/)
LU u.r ~ ~ LU
~ ~ LU
l9 sa
:r:
~~ 0.
u~
(/) N
j_, 10-10-22
/2, 11-7-22
SHEET NO.
~E~XT~E:::'..RI~O~R~W:.:_A=LL~AL~T:..:::::E=::--:RA':-::TI~O-:-:N::;:-S ~~"'':;';:;. :;-;- -' 1(07 .1
50% RULE EXHIBITS SCALE 1/8"=1FT NORTH
I ,,
,I
NEWFTG.
30SF (1)
ii
i\
fi -------" -------
- - -.-- (~- lcSF{1;.""!
' ~
-·----
•N 3'-4 Z-4 , ·-6'-+l .'-+ -·r
i I ;I
I 'I
ll ii
:I '1
GARAGE FLOOR Pl.AN __ _
.I
!I
l1
11 MAIN FLOOR PLAN
I···'"
I
LANA! FTG'S.
16Sf (4)= 64 SF
..Effi'S. TBR_
113SF
LEGEND
.. EXISTING GARAGE LEVEL
f'XIS,~GGAiiAGEL2vci.AREA
ALE,'0@ __ ;tlAJA,:iJ. {N'.'I FTG~,
AlTl:REC@EX GAR~ VIAil ff GS iO BE ,EM!I/ED
cX, S.\RAGE w~u Al Tf!l,EU
423SF
'4SF
113Sf
'25Sf
TOTALG,ALTEREDAflfA - ----i79.25Sf
_ EXI5TINliMAIN LEVEL
EX.1U[RE0'1JRNEl'l'1'GS --~-- -~-- iOTAL % MUFER!D AREA 73SF/1.884Sf = 4% ' 50 % RULE CALCULATIONS
(EX.; GARAGE:
:X.) Mi','1
TOTAL EX. FOUMlATION:
123Sf

1.88~"

2.207Sf
ALTERED EXIST. FOUNDATION:
(Al Tl GAflAGE:
'.All) 1/fiJN:

TOTIL AlTERiD FOUWATION
lig_2ssF
/35f
~
• Alli,\ 0' Ni:// FOU~GA PONS
252.25SF
R:01 i:::::_~ AREA Cf NEIIC:CKtlANN) ARE\ l 152.25S'/2 . .l07Sf = !'% ;JTILA..;. FOU/,DAPOI, I

FOUNDATION ALTERATIONS
50% RULE EXHIBITS SCALE 1/8"=1FT NORTH
LU
u 6
z <t:

LU z
0 :5
0 t--1 VJ Cf) u.J LJ.J
~ ::>
z
~ w
LU ~
~ u
....

LL
_,
~ :c Cl..
u ..--l
<;j"
Cf) N
Ji 10·10-22
_&. 11-7-22
SHEET NO.

AB:AOr R30r iO 3Ei1Llf~
APEAOf PJOf TO 3EREM::VED
AFEA Of RJOf TO 3EALTEEED
ROOF Pl.AN A.OOR FRAMING ALTERATIONS
OOSTl:,3 ROOF /J0\
EX.3TING,~OFTG":mc
fXISil';G ROOF TO BE REMOVED
E( Sll~G ::or AFC:. Aliff:] IJEW RJOF ARE\@lA!,\I
10ll1'll.& t::WHOO' Mf:A
'.c CFROO' 'RAMi',; IHEf:J

2.f34Sf
305'
&DSf
12S'
416Sf
5:8Sf
1 -- --t ~-=! ====i:====t====;::::::::-===:::::;;:;,:::=-=---;:,:=--=,;::;==-;:~ 1 :1 I -~'+,---=,------n
\ 'CT"J,-'-jj-f; ~ : r±---7
\
1 i1~1
:/ ,I I • .. ·: : ~rt
rA'-MYROOy I j I: r/-
11 : ,: L"
\
I I
I I
I I
! ~ Arce : :

I
I
\

AJERED I/ALLS
ll
ii :_'•I I , i'
:~ ,, '1

MAIN FLOOR PLAN FLOOR FRAMING ALTERATIONS
EXISll'iG MAllllEVB.AiEA
E( MAl!H:vEl BA'TO BE F:MOVE(
WIii \OOITIO':

TCiAL ML ~.JEHEC ~REA

1.El4SF
-1IS'
-316SF
3275:
327SF/1.884Sf• 17%
A,'.EA 0' fLOOR TO BE REMilV'O
r---- ,---7 --------, l I
- I -~- Ii
I
I
I
I
50 % RULE CALCULATIONS
EXISTitlG FLOOR FR~MiNG·
i:Xl MA'HPIEL ll• 1.88,S'
itXi :PPER.:VELi•: Pili':~): · 2585'

FLOOR & ROOF ALTERATIONS
'2:. i0-10·22
&. 11-7-?2
j_, 12-5·22
SHEET NO.

CALIFORNIA GREEN CODE REOUIREMEIIITS._
15) BEFORE FINAL JNSPECT!ON A COMPLETEOP!;:RAT!ONAND
MA't,TENM,CE f,~,"<NUAl :_;HALL ~E Pfl,:</IDE TO THf l'UILf)ltJG

OCCUPANT OR OWNER, CONTRACTOR OR OWNER SHALLSUBMIT AN
AFFADAV!TTHAT CONF!R"AS TI-'F. DEi lVERY DF SUCH. A SN.1Pl[ OF T1,E MANVALIS A'/AlU,L''-E ON iHE 1---L,USINC & COMMUNITY O!:::VELOPMENT (HCU) WEBSITE
16) T!1E MANUAL SflOULD INCLUDE 1N ADDITION TOOl HER ASPECTS THF e:ouJJWING
A) DIRECTION TO THE BUILO!NGOWNER on OCCUPANT THAT THE M/\NUAL SH~!_l RflJl\!N WtTH TH!='. 81.Jll ~ING Fon THRtJUGH0!JT TPE LIFE CYCLE OF :HES1:-1UC1\J1'i.E
B) OPERATION ANO MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1) [UUIPML~n & ,VPUN!,~ES, :'JCLUL'rt;GW,1 ;ERSt,'/ING ,-,c_v1cc;e; ANO '.-'YST[',15

HVAC SYSTEMS WATER HF A TING SYSTEMS & OTHER MAJOR APPUANCES &

EQUIPMENT
2) ROOF&. YARD DRAINAGE INCLUDlt .. G GUTIERS AAiD 0-UWNSPOUTS 3) SPACE CONDITIONING SYSTEMS INCLVDlNG CONDENSERS & AIR FILTERS 4) lANOf;C/\PE lhf41GAl,,JN SY';TEMS
5) WATER Af:.LJSE SYSTEMS

CJ INFORMATION FROM LOCAL UTILITY, WATER & WASTE RECOVERY PROVIDERS ON~.'ETHOOS TO FURTl"'F'R AE';!JCE RFSOURCE co•JSLiM?TION l"ICLUD'"JG RECYCLE r,.ioGn,~.Ms I:, _JCA-;-1 ::.lNS
DJ f'l13UC mANfT(JATA r:1JN MO/QR c,,RP(>:_;~QPf',JNS /,\'All.AR: E IN '-iE Am-A EJ EOUCATIONALMATEAIALONn!E POSITIVE IMPACTS OF AN INTe:Fl.lOR RELATIVI:.

HU',1IJITY ~~TWfc'N30-t.,IJ % i'~ ',',/HA'T :.'ETHGr;s AN C'Ccur,,\NT M,\Y US[ TO MAINTAIN SUCH HUMIDITY LEVElS
r-') IIJ>.'URM!,TION tFlOUi VlATETt r.ONSFRVATi':N LANDSCAPE & IRR!GATl'JN DES1GN & W:JTROUERS WH!Ch CONStRVE V•'1-"\TER
8) mSTRU~TIONS FOR Mfi!NTA1t:!NG Gt ITT ER~ & OOWNSP'"'UTS M!D THE lMPC!':ITANCE Of GJVERliNGWAlER Al LEAS! 5Ff A'IIAY t'ROM ~hE rou:mAT.l.:..N H) !NFORMl!.T!ON ON REOPIRED ROUTI~JE MA!NTENAl'!CE ME~SUR!?S, lNClUDlNG BUT •KJT L!MtTED TC, CAULKING, r''AINTIN',.t GRAJJNG.t•ROU~~U BUJLlJ:NG £ IC.

J) INFORMATION ABOUT ST ATE SOLAR ENERGY & INCE,NllVE !-'ROGfiAf.1SAVA!lABU:

K) A -.:OPY 0f ALL SPECJAL INSPECTICl,"I VERlflCATl<..:NS Rb ... U!Al!J BY 11-:~ ENFVACING

AGENCY OR THIS COO E
17) A COPY OF THE COMPLETE OPERATION & MAINTFNANCF. MANUAL AS OUTLINED IN THE NOTES AR~VE YJ'lt L BE ~':UVE'AED T0 THE BUILDING OWNf:fi PRIOR TO FINAt !!'~SPECTION 18) AN OWNER. CERTIFICATE SHALL BE COMPLE fEO ANO SIGNEO BY EITHER AUCENSED GEt,CRAL ,.:ONTf<t,CTOH OR l\1F-'ME :J'll'NEf~ :..:ER'f'.i-YING !HAT /I GOPY ,JF Tfl[ MANl;:.t HASElEENOELIVERED /RtCCIVEO fOTHE 8UILDINGOWNER. THE CERTIFICATION FOAM CAf,,: BEGBfA!NCO FROM THtUi:VELOP~lENf SERVJGES D[PAR1MEN1 19) THE MOISTURE CONTE Ni OF BUILDING MATERIALS
USED IN WALLAND FL009 FRAf!,ING !S CHECKED BEFORE
ENCLOSURE. MOISTURE CO~HENT SHALL BE CHECKED BY
EITHER A PROBE 7YPE OR CONT ACT TYPE MOISTURE
METER A CERTIFICATE OF COMPUANCE INDICATlNG
DATE Of TEST, LOCATION AND RE SUL TS ISSUED BY THE
!=RAMER. SUBCONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR

MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
(CGBSC 4.505.3}
20) ACERTIF!CATIONCC".iPlETEOAND SJGNEDBY EITHER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR OR BUILDING OWNER CERTIFYlNG THAT THE PAINT, STAIN, AND ADHESIVES COMPUES WITH THE A:EQUIRE~!ENTS OF THE CAUFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE. A COPY OF THE FOR~t CAN BE OBT AfNED FROM :HE DEVELOPMENT

SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CALIFORNIA TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE
1) AN ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND REGISTERED INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE (CF-5RJ POSTED BY THE INSTALLING CONT.A.ACTOR SHALL BE SUBMlTTEO TO THE FIELD JNSPECl'OR
DURING CONSTAUC!ION@ THE BUILDING SHE
A REGISTERED CF-6R Wkl HAVE A UNIQUE 21 DIGIT

REGISTRATION NUMBERFOLLOWED BY FOUR ZEROS LOCATED
AT!HE BOlTOM OF EACH PAGE. !HE FIRST '2 DIGITS Of THE

NUMBER WILL MATCH THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE
CF-: R. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Will f"K.lT BE !SSUED
UNTIL FORM CF-SR IS REVIEWED ANO APPROVED.
2) AN ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND REGISTERED CERTIFICATE(S) OF FIELD VERIFICATION AND DIAmIDST!C TESTING(CF·-1A}
SHALL BE POSTED AT ThE BUILDING SIGNED & REGISTERED

CERTIFICATE(S)OF FIELD VERIFICATION & DIAGNOSTIC
TESTING (CF-4R) SHALL BE POSTED AT THE BUILOltm SITE BY A CERTIFIED HERS RATER.

A REG!Sl::RED CF-4R W!LLLHAVE A UNIOUE25 OIG!T REG!STRATION NUMBER <..OCATED AT 1HE BOTTOM Of EACrl PAGE
THE FIRST 20 DIGITS OF THE NUMBER WILL MATCH THE REGISTRATION NU~.1BEROFTHE ASSOCIATED CF-6R. CEATFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WIU NOT BE >SSUED UNTIL CF-4R IS REVISWEO & APPROVED.

CALIFORNIA TITLE 24 LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS
1) KITCHEN·
AL!.. THE INSTALLED WATTAGE OF LUM!NAIRES IN KITCHEN SHALL BE HIC-H EFFICACY AND SHALL HAVE A MANUAL ONICFF !N ADDITION TO A VACANCY SENSOR OR DIMMER UNDERCABtNET LIGHTING SHALL BE SWITCHED SEPARATELY. 2) LIGHTING IN GARAGE, LAUNDRY ROOMSN~D UT!UTY ROOMS·
ALL LUMIN!JRES SHALL EE HIC:~ EfF!CA.CY Ii.NO AT! EAST ONE t!JMINAlPE IN EACfi Cf-'. THl;;Sl; SP/,C!;:S Sil,\LL BE CONTF:OLLED BY A VACANCY. 3} OTHER ROOMS;
All LUMIN/,!RES SHALL BE HIGd EFFICACY AND StlA....L HA'/E A MANUAL ON I OFF IN ADDITION TO A VACANCY SENSOR. OA DIMMER, .:) OLnCrJOR l lGHTING:

ALL LUMINAIRES MOUNTED TO lHE BUIL.DfNGOR TO OTHER BUILDINGS ON THE SAME LOT SHAU BE HIGH EFFICACY UJMINA'9ES AND MUST BE CONTROLLED RY A !.',\NUii'. ONNJIJ OFF SWITCf-' .. AND :::omnl-lllE[', f3Y ONE OF 11,ESE f...UTOMt,TIC CONTROL TYPES: PHOTOCONTROL. ANO A MOTION SENSOR. OR ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK, OR ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM. i/ A VAt"OR BAHAlf:H a CAPILLARY DREAK ARE REQUIRED AT SLAB ON GRADE FOUNnATJONS. A4" THICK'6ASE0F 1/2"0A
LAf~GER C EAN N1GREGATE sr !ALL G[ PROV!DEO WITH A VAPOR BARRIER IN DIRECT CONTACT WIT!-! CONCRETE:. & ACONCRl:rE MIX DESIUJ WHl(d ADDr::ESSES BLEEDING. SHRINK:NG &
CURING SHALL BE USED. SES ACt 302.2R·02
ALTCRNATIVELY PROV!Cf; A st:,a Df'SIGN RY A LICENSED

PROFESSIONAL
2) AUTOMATIC IRRIGATlm-1 SYSTEM CONTROLLERS INSTALLED AT TIMF OF F:fJAL INSPECTl'.iN S!i,~LL8[ WEATH1':fi-8ASED
~ SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: (CG8SC 4.304.1)
·:a)ClJ~JTROL! ... ERS S:iALL G2 WEA lHER CR SOIi MOISrlJRE·Bi\SED CONTROLERS THAT ,\UTOMATICALI..Y ADJUST IRRIGATION IN RESPONSE TO GHANGl;;S IN FLANTS NEEDS AS W'::ATI trn CODr~IONS CHANG':
(b) WEATHER 8/\SEO CONTROLLERS wm IOUT INTEGRAL RAIN SENSORS or; COMf\'UNICA I IONS SYSlfMS TH/\..~ ACOLNTFOfl LOCf-L

AAINFALLSHALL HAVE SEPARATE WIRED OR WIRELESS
Rt·'N S[Ni:'OR W, HCH CONNECfS OH :;QMMUNICATE:S WI
THE CONTROLLERS. SOIi MOISTURE-BASED CONTROLLERS
AP[ NOT r.;EQUlriEO TC HAVF 1-lAIN srnson: INPUT
3) JOINTS AND QPENINGS, A•JNULAA SPACES AROUND PIPES.

EU::.CTR!C CABLES.CONGUITS,UR OTHt.R OPl:.N!NGS JN PLAfES AT ex 1 EAIOH WAUS SHALL BE PROTEC l ED AGA!NSl
THf PASS,\GE OF RODEI.TS OY GlOSING SUCH OPF"IINGS
WITH CEMENT MOFl rAR, CONCRE ff MASONRY OR SIMILAR
MF IHOD AC-:CEPTtBLE rn THE LNFORC!NG AGENCY
(CGBSC 4.406.1)
4) A MINfMW,4 OF 50%0F THE CONSTHUCTlON WAS rE
GEt:[RAT[~l AT ·111E SITE 1S TO EE DIVERTED TO RE:C:VCLE OR SALVAGE PFR CGBSC SECTION 4 408.1 i CITY ORDINANCE
5) BEFOHE FlNAL !NSH:CTIOU, A COMPLt TE OPtHATION AND
MAINTENANCE MANUAL SHALL Bf PROVlOEO TO fHE BUILDING

OCCJPAW AND OWNER

CONTHACTOR OR OWNER SHALL SUBMIT AN AFFADAVIT THAT
cm:FIRMS THE CCLIVEFYOF if IE '.1A!NTCNANC!:;'MANLrAL
[CGSSC 4.410.1)
'11 OUCl :>PENltlGS /\'JD Of!IE:R R[LATED t,IR DIS fRIBUl!ON

COMPONENT OPENINGS SHALL BE COVERED OUAING
COl'JSTfi:UCTION
1CGBSC4,504.1)
7) ADHESIVES SEALANTS AND CAULKS SHALL BE COMPLIANT
WITH voe AND OTHER TOXIC COMPOUND LIMITS
(CGBSC 4.504.2.1}
8) PAINTS, STAINSANJ OTHER COATINGS SHALL BE crnyiPUANT WITH voe UM!TS SET IN SECTION 4 504.2.2 &
TABLE 4.504.3 OF GALGREEN
9) AEROSOL PAINTS AND COATINGS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH
PRODUCT '.VEIGHTED MIR LIMITS FOR I/QC & OTHER TOXIC
COMPOUNDS (CGBSC 4.504.2.3)
10) A CERTIFICATION COMPLETED AND SIGNED BY THE GENERAL

CONTRACTOR , SUBCONTRACTOR OR BUILDING OWNER JS REQUIRED

CERTIFYING THAT THE RCSIUENT FLOORING, COMPOSITE WOOD
PRODUCT. PL YWOOO, PARTICLE BOARD ETC. COMPLY WI
THE voe LIMITS ANO FORMALDEHYDE UMJTS SPEC!FlEO IN THE

NOTES ABOVE ANO THE CAUFOANIA GREEN BUILDING CODE
11) CARPET AND CARPET SYSTEMS SHALL BE COMPLIANT w/ voe UMITS
A LETTER FROM THE CONTRACTOR &/OR THE BUILD!NG OWNER

CERTIFYING WHAT MATERIAL HAS BEEN USED AND ITS
001.IPUANCE WITH THE CODE f\1UST BE SUBMITTED TO THE
BUILDING INSPECTOR (CGBSC 4.504.3)
12) .SO¾ OF THE FLOOR AREA RECEIVING RESILIENT
FLOORING SHALL COMPLY ¼1TH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:

LIMlTS DEFJNED IN THE COLLABORATIVE FOR HIGH
A) voe UMFS DEF.NED IN THE COLLABORATIVE FOR HIGH
PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS {CHPS) HIGH PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS

DATABASE

BJ PRODUCTS COMPLIANT WITH CHPS CRITERIA CERTIFIED UNDER THE GtlEENGUARD CHILDREN AND SCHOOL PROGRAM
C) CERTIFICATION UNDER THE: RESILIENT FLOOR COVERINGS INSTITUTE (ACF!} FLOOR SCORE PROGRAM
DJ MEET THE CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEAL TH ff ST AN OARD METHOD

FOR TESTING AND EVALUATION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC CHEMICAL EMMISS!ONSFROM INCOOR SOURCES USING ENVIRONMENTAL
CHAf..iBERSff VERSION 1.1, FEBRUARY 2010 ( ALSO KNOWN AS SPECIFICATION 01350)
13) PARTICLE BOARD, MEDIUM DENS~ FIBERBOARD (MD'°')
& HARDWOOD PL YWOOO USED IN THE INTEA:OA F!NJSH

SYSTEMS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FORMALDEHYDE
AS SPECIFIED IN AAS'$ AIR TOXIC CONTROL MEASURE FOR
COMPOSITE WOOD AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 4.504.5 AND TABLE 4,504.5 OF CAL GREEN
14) BUILDING MATERIALS WI IH VISIBLE SIGNS OF WATER
DAMAGE SHALL OOT BE INSTALLED. WALLS AND FLOOR
FR!,WNG S:-!AlL tK)T BE ENCLOSED WHEN f-RMtlNG
MEMBERS EXCEED 19% MOISTLITTE CONlENT
THE MOISTURE CONTH,; OF 8UJLOING MA1EH!ALS USED IN WALL AND FLOOR FRAMING IS CHECKED BEFORE ENCLOSURE:

MO!STUFIF CONTI-NT Stl,\LL BE VEAIFl[D BY EITHE!-l PAOl3f- TYPE OR CONTACT TYPE MOISlURE ME: TEA.

MECHANICAL &.PLUM.BING NOTES
10) A PLUMBING FIXTURE CERTIFICATION MUST BE COMPI.ETED AND BY El-1-lER t, UCENSEDGENEAAl_ 80NIHAC10f-l. OR A PLUMP.ING SUBCONtflAC10R. OR THE BUILDING OWNER CERTIFYING iHi:

FLOW RATE OF THE FIXTURES INSTALLED. COPIES OF THF.

CE ... rnFJCATION CAN GE OBTAl~JED FnOM THE DEVELOPMFNT SEFl.VICES DEPARTMENT.
1) PEFIMANENT VACUUM BRCAKEHS SHALL BE INSTALLED ALL
llOSE GIBBS
2) H.V A C.EOUIPMEN f, WA I !.:R HEATERS SHOWCRH[ADS, ANO FAUCETS SHALL ALL HR CERTIFIED GYTH[ cAuruHNIA ENERGY

GOMISSION
3) ALL PLUMBING FIXTURES AND FITTINGS WILL BE WATER CONSERVING AND WILL COMPLY WI lH 2019 CGBSC SECTION 4.303.1
4) THE EFFECTIVE FLUSH VOLUME; Of ALL W.C'S $HALL NOT EXCEED

1.28 GALLONS PEF! FLUSl-l. TANK TYr[ w.c·s SHALL BE CFJHIFIEO TO THE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF THC U.S. EPA WAT!:RSENSE Sf~l-'CIFICATION roR TANK TYPE TOllJ::Ts
5) MAXIMUM LAVATORY FAUCET FLOW 1.2 GAi.LONS PER MINUTE @60 psl & A MINIMUM FLOW RATE OF NOT LESS THAN 0.8 GPM @?O psi
6) MAXIMUM Kl'TCHEN rAUCET rLOw 1 8 GALLONS PEA MINUTE @60 p~i KITCHEN FAUCETS MAY TEMPORARAILY INCREASE: A FLOW RATE TOil..

MAXIMUM OF 2.2 GALLONS@ GO psi GUT MUS f oei=ALJLT BACK 10 fHE LS GALLON!: PER MlNUTE
1) MAXIMUM SHOWER HEAD FLOW. 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE @BO psi 8) MULTIPLE SHOWERHEAOS SERVING ONE SHOWEn·
WHEN A SHOWER IS SERVED l::!Y MORE THAN ONE SHO\\·ERHEAO THE COMBINED FLOW RATE OF ALL SHOWERHEADS ANDfOA
0 THEA SI lOWER OUTLE'! S CON TROLLED BY A SINGLE V,',,L VE S, lAl.L NOT EXCEED 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE@ 80 PSI OR Tl tE SHOWER S!lALL BE DESIGNED TO ALLOW ONLY ONE SltOW[H. OUTLFTTO l~E

IN OPERATION AT ONC TIME
'J) PER 2019 CG8SC SECTION 4.303 2 PLUMBING i:IXTUHES ( WATEFl CLOSCTS AND URINALS) & FITTINGS ( FAUCETS & SHoWERHEADS) SttALl BE INSTAL I ED IN ACCORDANCE WITll fHE CALIFClf4NIA PLUMBING CODE AND TABLE 1401 1 OF THE CPC
10) A PLUMBING FIXTURE CEH nF!CA TION MUST DE COMPLETED ANO S!GNED BY EITHER A LICENSED GENEHAL CONTRACTOR, Ofl A PLUMBING SUBCONTRACTOR OR Tl"IE BUILDING OWNEFl cerrnFYING THE rLOW HATE Uf- fHE HXTUl"l[S INSTALLED. COPIES OF THE CERTIFICATION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
11) MAXIMUM HOHIZONT AL AND vt;RTICAL LENGTH fOR CLU fHES DRYER VENT 14 rT WITH 2 OFFSETS
REDUCE BY 2' FOR EACH ADDI I IONAl BEND ACTUAL LENGTH 5 Ff IMAX l..ENGTtl 12 rT( SEE SHT A2.t) 12) EXHAUST DUCTS AND DRYER VENTS SHAU !3E EOUIPPCO wm I A BACK-DRAFT DAMPCRS 13) BATHROOM EXHAUST FAN TO BE CONNECTED omecn Y TO
EXTERIOR ANO PnOVIDE MIN OF 5 A!A CHANGES PEA HOUR
WI MAX NOISE RATING OF 3 SONE (INTERM!'TTENTJ
14) MECH. EXHAUST FANS WHICH TERMINATE OUTSIDE THE
BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED !N EVERY BATHROOM THAT

CONTAINS A TUB OR A SHOWER
MECH. EXHAUST FANS WHICH EXHAUST DlRECTL Y FROM

BATHROOMS SHALL COMPLY WITH CAL GREEN CODE SECTION
4,506.1 AS FOLLOWS:
a) FANS SHALL BE ENERGY STAR COMPUANT AND BE DUCTED

TO TERMINATE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING
b) UNLESS FUNCTIONING AS A COMPONENT OF A WHOLE

HOUSE VENTILATING SYSTEM , FANS MUST BE
CONTROLLED BY A HUM!DIST AT WHICH SHALL BE READILY
ACCESSIBLE. HUMIDISTAT CONTROLS SHALL BE

CAPABLE OF ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN A RELATIVE HUMIDITY
RANGE OF 50 TO 80''!.,
C) ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS AND EXHAUST TERMINATIONS Sr'ALL TERMINATE NOT LESS THAN 3' FEET FROM A PROPERTY LINE AND 3' FROM OPENINGS lNTO THE BUILDING.
15) HVAC DUCTS AND PLENUMS TO BE INSTALLED AND INSULATED PER CMG SECTIONS 601 THAU 605.

INSTALLED LEVEL OF INSULATION R4.2 IF IN UNCOND!T!ONED SPACE 16) WATER HEATER:

NEWT ANKLESS WATER HEATER • NA VIEN NPE·240S 200,000 BTU I HR - 0.97-UEF 17) HVAC
2 NEW HVAC SYSTEMS, 1 NEW HEAT PUMP@ LIBRARY
18) PROVIDE MINIMUM CLEARANCES AROUND HVAC UNITS FOR

MAINTENANCE PER MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS
19) PROVIDE AT11C ACCESS PANEL MIN OPENING SIZE 30"X22~

MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM ACCESS PANEL TO
EQUIPMENT 20FT
20) PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED PASSAGEWAY LARGE ENOUGH TO

REMOVE LARGEST PIECE OF EQUIPMENT
ACCESS PASSAGE FLOOR TO BE MIN 24ff WJDTH
21) All ABS AND PVC PIPING ANO FITTINGS SHALL BE ENCLOSED

WITHIN WALLS AND FLOORS COVERED WITH TYPE 'X' GYPSUM

BOARD OR SIMILAR ASSEMBLIES THAT PROVIDE THE SAME
LEVEL OF FIRE PROTECTION.

PROTECTION OF MEMBRANE PENETRATIONS rs NOT REQUIRED
22J POL VINYL CHLORIDE:

STATE HEALTH ANO SAFETY CODE SEC. 17921.9 BANS THE

USE OF CHLORINATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE ( CPVC) FOR

INTERIOR WATER SUPPLY PIPING
23) SHOWER COMPARTMENTS AND BATHTUBS WITH INSTALLED
SHOWCR HEADS SHALL BE FINISHCO WI tH A NON ABSORBENT

SURFACE THAT EXTENDS TO A HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN
6 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR {CRC R301.2J
24) THE CONTROL VALVES IN SHOWERS, TUB/SHOWERS,
BATHTUBS, AND BIDETS MUST SE PRESSURE: BALANCED
OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVl;S CPCSECTIONS 40!:1.409.410

STAIR PROTECTION
1) ACCESSIBLE SPACE BELOW STAIR SHALi. HAVE WAU S
& SOFFI rs PROTECTED ON ENCLOSED SIDE BY MIN Mr'
TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD
FIREBLOQKING 1) PROVIDE APPROVED FlHE'.8LOCKING AT STUD WALL FRAMING (i',) FOLLOWING LOCATIONS
a) AT FLOOR AND CEILING LEVELS
b> HOr-llZON1 Al.l YA r INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 10 FT
c) AT ALL INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN CONCEAi. ED

HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SPACES
Cl)AT All CHIMNEYS AND FIRPLACES SEE SHEET A7,2
2} PROVIDE APPROVED F!AESTOPPING MATERIAL
AT ALL OPENINGS AROUND PIPES, VENTS, DUCTS. C/\ULES

AND WIRES AT CEILING ANO FLOOR LEVELS
~FE,D'. GLAZING
1) TEMPERED OR SAFETY GLAZING SHALL BE !t..STALLl::O WHtRE GLAZING IS USEO !NA HAZARDOUS lOCAflON AS OEF!NEO
!N SECTI'::.,N R3C,H OF T1lE Ct.J-.::

SCHEDULE SEE WINDOW /\NO DOOR
2) CTI.ASS SHALL BE INSCRIBED WITH MANUFACTURERS
OFS!GN/,i!ON Pl:R SEr:TION A308.1 0F THf ~BC
3) SOME HAZAADUUS LOCATlONS APPLICABLE:

GLA.ZEO :XlOAS J\NO t;l.AZED f'ANEc..;:; WIT! IIN 2FI ')F DCCJf~ ANO LESS THAN 5FT ABOVE FLOOR
G! A2lNG !N ENrt.OSUP:[S FCR BATHTUBS .. ~ND SI 10WER'S AND lESS THAN 5FT ABOVE FLOOR
GLAZING THAT J\AEF..TS FOLLOWJNG CONDITIONS:
a) AllEAUf- lNDl\,IDUAL PANE ',10RE ~HAN 8Sfb) BOT I OM EDGE OF GlAZJNGLESS THAN 18~ ,\BOVE- f-LOOl-1
c) TOP EDGE !S MORE THAN 35• ABOVE FLOOR
d) WITHIN 3G" OF WAlK'tJGSU~FACE
4) PROVIDE TEMPERED GLASS @SKYLIGHTS OR APPROVED
EQUAL PFR CBC f/308.ri 2
& SMOKE DETECTORS:
1) PF:IJVIDE SMOKF- DETE:~TORS IN ALL SLEEP ~JG RC ~MS & HI\LL WAYS OR AREAS LEADING TO EACH SLEEPING ROOM.

LOCATION SHO\'it"-J AS @', 2) THE INSTALLATION OF SMDK~ ALARMS AND SMOKE DETECTORS SHfil I cry,,JPLY 1111TH THE SPEG!FIC LOCAT!r,~ RECl !IREME~TS CF CRG R314.J.4
3) SMOKE ALARMS SHALL COMPLY WI I'H NFPA 72 ,\NO SHALL BE USfED!NACCO;::iDANC[ wm, UL21/
4) C0MBINA110N SMOKE AND CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE Llt;f[D It-. i\CCOf:;OANCE W!Tt: UL21r' AND L': 2034
5) SMOKE ALARM SYSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS SHALL BE C',Al.lFORNIA SIAlE M,\RSHALL LISTCD ANO APPRl,VED I~, ACCC-<t)ANCf WIT'I (::Aur<,RNIA CODE OF REGULAT:ONS, nLE 19, DIV. 1 FOR THE PURPOSI:: OF WHICH lHE.Y ARE INSTALLEU.

CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS
1) PROVIDE CARBON M0t1'.'.1XIDE' ,\I.ARMS tNTERCONf:?ClEr & HARD WIHED Wt BArlC.HY BA.CK-UP AT FCLLOW!NG LOCATIONS.

OUTSIDE EACH S! F..EPING AREA lN THE IMMEDIATE VIC!Nl1'Y OF BE:1ROOM
ON EVE:.HV LEVEL OF rHE DWELLING UNI r INCLUD!NG BASEMENT Sff l;LEC iHICAl PLANC> rOR LrJCATICNS
INSULA]ON:
1) ATTIC INSULATION BATTS@ NEW CONSTRUCT!lON A-30 'TY?JCAL 2) WAlL iNSULATION R-19AT NEW EXTERIOR WALLS
3) RECIRCULATING SECTIONS OF HOT WATER P!PES SHALL SE

INSULATED PER CEC STANDARDS
4) INSULATION FOR CHILLED WATER OR ~EFRIGERAN'T PIPl~~G SHALL INCLUDE A VAPOR RETARDANT IF NOT LOCATED lN

CONITIONED SPACE

CAULKING
All JOINTS AND PENETRATIONS lN THE BUilDlNG ENVELOPE
SHALL BE CAULKED AND SEALED.

SEE ALSO CALIFORNIA GREEN CODE REQU!HEMENTS

EGRESS WINDOW
1 / PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE OPERABLE WINDOW THAT MEETS
FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
a) MIN OPENING AREA 5.7 S.F.
b) MIN OPENING HElGHT 24"
c) MIN OPENING WIDTH .20"
dJ SILL HEIGHT SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 44"

ABOVE FLOOR BELOW

DOORS ANO WINDOWS
1) WINDOWS SHALL HAVE LABEL LISTING CERTIFIED U FACTOR

SHGC ANO INFILTRATION STANDARDS THAT MEETCEC
REOUlREMENTS
2) EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL BE
WEATHEFi.STA!PPED
3) ALL JOINTS ANO PENETRATIONS SHALL BE CAULKED ANO
SEALED

SKYLIGHTS
SKYLIGHT GLAZING TEMPSHED !NSUlATINGTYPJCAL
SKYLIGHTS BY VELUX AMERICA INC. TYPE FCM UN:TS IAPMO ER·G199

SKYLIGHTS SHAU EE TESTED BY APPROVED INDEPENDENT LABORATORY

AND BEAR LABEL IDENTIFYING MANUFACTURER, PERFORMANCE GRADE

RATING AND INSPECTION AGENCY TO SHOW COMFUANCE WI
AAMA,WDMACSA 101/l.S.2/A440
GARAGE
1) DOOR FROM GARAGE TO RESiOENCE SHALl BE Mr~~ 1-318-
TH!CK SOLID WOOD OR HAVE 2.0 MIN flAE RATING
DOOR SHALL BE SELF Cl.OSING AND SELF LATCHING
OPENINGS IN FIRE SPRINKLED RESIDENCE NEED m~LY BE

SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING
2) PROVIDE MIN 518 "TYPE 'X' GYPSUM SOARD APPLIED TO
GARAGE S10E AT ALL WALLS AND CEILINGS SEPARATING

GARAGE FROM HABITABLE SPACE
3) DUCTS PENETRATING WALLS OR CEILING SEPARATING
G/19AGE F!10M [ 1WELW,'G SHN L BE f.HN N{l 2G GA
SHEET Mf:TAL OH OTHER APPROVED MATEHIAL & SHALL

HAVE NO OPENINGS INTO GARAGE

GUARDRAILS
1l TOP ::lF GUARDRAIL SHAl L BE MltJ. 42" '•!EIGHT
2) OPEN GUARDRAILS SHALL HAVE RAILS suet! THAT A SPHERE OF ..t" IN DI.AMETEh CAW,'·J r PASS THROUGH
EIREPL~CES . _ _
1/ TOP OF GUAHDRAlLSHALBE MllJ. 42~ hE!GHT
2' OPEN GUARDRAILS SHAU. HAVE RAILS SUCH THAT A SPHER~
OF 4" IN DIAMETEH CANNOf PASS THHUUGH

GENERAL NOTES
L1J I
0:::
:::> cc Q
I- 0
0 ~
u "' " 0-,
..: ~ L1J u "' I- <( -0 ~ Ei
"' Lfl 0 1---l -fl 00 u
I .....; -;:: i:!
u <( "' c;. ::, u ~t:
0::: C 0 ['.:
.,,. -~ <( :;::::; C '? ..:::

L.. °' ~
-~ N ro "' ~ ·f
~ 2'. ~ '° "" E a; "
~i
F ~ o E er; - ·-= z 2 ~ 1---l cii " '?
~ «l "'
N
"'
<", r-;, N 0
<( '°
" ~
11-21-21
SHEET NO.

A1 .0
I
L
,,
(I \
:1
'
\', •. \
_E_)'.ISIJ!:!(;_SINGLE FAMILY RESICENCl_
2 STORY
\
\
fl
I I
/I
ti
II
II
'J
103' N, 78 07' E.

II
1 STORY
BELOW
NORTH
w
u~
z LI.I
LU C!l
0 <i::
.......i z
ti) :5
wo
er. rjJ
er. ~ wz
~5
:c !:::. uu
r./) ~ ,-I
~
1 ,·21·21
•. 5-18·22 LL. 8·15-2?.
10·3•22
i!: 12-5·22

SHEET NO
A 1.1
I
I
L
, I :
i ' .__J 1 1
, I I.
,1 \, , 1
'' \ I ' -- ''I \ I
' \
~\- \-
i\ ;
-1-,-4-"° \\I: '_J '
I I
I I~. I~:

I
I
/I
;1:
; Ii
I
4"Ro
'"' I I 4'fFT
FLAT ROOF EXIST TORE!J!JN
1/4',FT.I
----.--7 __/
LCJf-,'E~ Ea.£:.ow
T
5'-0" SYSB
I
I
--l
----'--t1
I
I
I
M.BEORO_OM 1::-1rx2t-s
"!Af'.C.VOOJ
~
'''""
"- GALLERY _,,, / 1 '-......_ Cf'E"NTOBEl0/1/ I --...___x,..,..,. / "-. "-.

I
"-.
"-.

I
A4.2
D
/ IJ@ill I
'JJSTI~~Wlil.Slll Be Rf'/~vtO
EXJSTING WlllS iO RR.!AIH
\'EW\';''.'.S
fXIST!:,GUPf~, lfVE, ro2sF I EXISTING u L PHA',TOM :sa SF EXls-'iGUL '.ROSS • -11SF
EXISTING 3AY10 SE REMCitO · '47SF -·- ~ PRC'JSEOL ''ERlf 'LGRC'I . bJ'\\ EVEL PLAN~ ~I__,~ - eRQPOS~D uPeE.P- _L sc,ce ,. ,n - NORTH
6 w :c
u~
z IJJ
w co
0~
1--1 :5
(.f) 0 w (.f)
0::: ~
0::: ~ w [1
:c
~~ !=i
u~
(.f) Cl..
..-t
s:r
N
11-21·21
5-18-22
&8-15·22
~ 11-7-22
SHEET NO.

A 1.2
_)_
I
I

MAIN LEVEL AEOVE
\ '----'I,-
\ 102' N,7B oz:_g \
I
r
I
I- r
L _J
I
NORTH
!STORY
BELOW GARAGE:

BELOW
- ,.::;i /
'1 ;-_J~ \
I ! \
' I /
I I

ABOVE I
I I
I I

I LEGEND I
r
EXC '~G G~:.;GE L:", ::_ GR~~3
I G',R,\G:UOWl';'.;E
---------7
423:'
('.Sf

PROPOSED GARAGE LEVEL PLANS
6 LJ.J :c
u u
<(
z LU
LJ.J co
0 <C
z 1--l
Cf) :5
UJ 0
ix U1
ix LLI
::::,
LJ.J z
~ w
~
u
.... :c LL.
.... u u
<C
Cf) 0.
..-i
'1'"
N
1>21-21
5-18-22
L!;_ 8-15-??.
10-3-22
SHcET NO,
Al.3
I 11
-!/~'-'-' --------
CE1UNGCOI/E@T•6"~
I
_I
EXISTING SPA TO REMAIN 11'-4'
"
"_EXISTl"NG SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
2STORY
f
/,'
/I
fl
11 II
u
~---+----" .

EXIST}mSIN,:LE FM.1 LY RESICENCE
1STOAY
\
/ / --✓ -- I I
II
II
u
I
NORTH
ElJSTINGRE~DENCE ,
BELO\'/ '
1 STORY
BELOW
GARAGE
BELOW
',",\ "I.
:!~
\. ~,~
EYJS,-o?v.:;~! wm • if
;itt I I I '
I
PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL DIMENSIONAL PLAN - ---SCALE1/4"~1FT <(
u
LU :c u u
z <(
LU
LU co
0 <(
z .....
(f) 5
LU 0
~ ti)
~ uJ
~
LU z
~ UJ
~
u
:c -
LL
......
u ~ (f) 0..
,-f
qN
11-21-21 j,8-15-22
SHEET NO.

A 2.1
I
I
A41 A41
\
\
~j
I\
I I
OJ
11 !1
I
\
i
I
I
;
_J
I
\ I
\ I
\1
/
I
I
'

FLAT ROOF
E/JSi!OF£1.WN
CONTROL UNE i

PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL DIMENSIONAL PLAN
NORTH scriTii~i'T
<(
u
LU :r:
u u <( z UJ
LU co
0 <( z
1--1
rJ) :5 lJ.J 0 (./)
w
::,
lJ.J z UJ
u
1-1
:c u.. u u <(
rJ) 0..
.,---1
¢
N
11·21·21
5·18·22 LI s-1s-22

SHEET NO
A 2.2
L • 0 /;
:;::"
_r___=-~=> ~~'" " - -- -i' l
GARAGE U:VEL
423 SF

MAIN FLOOR
1,884 SF

UPPER FLOOR
1,258 SF
~
~ LEGEND -ffi f~ii!J ~~ GROSS FLOOR AREA
l~I~I~I~] PROPOSED LANAI
MTING sceoim P_DOn Lr,,'.:G AREA
sc•oMJ fcCOR LIVING ARf,A iBR
l~i!,tGAIIAGE
G•'AGE ACJTION
C~ERED & ENCLOSED PATIO
CCESSORY D'1/ElllNG UNIT (ADU)

A - OOR AREA
"58SF
-11 Sf
: 1JSF
OSF
I ffiiiPCSEulAN~f~':NJ,\,: I ~ I
I '. =osrn GROSS

ISTINGGROSS
fllPOSED GROSS

OJ AREA HAS A RED ER TIME PER GEOIEC
--~;r _,
fJj
NORTH
FLOOR PLAN FAR SCALE 1/8"=1FT
I
UJ <(
uu
z <(
UJ z
0~
1-1 r,f)
cJ) ' UJ LU
o::::~
LU
0:::: ~ UJ u
~ff
0:::: ~ :::c 0..
u ~ cJ) N
11-21-21
-~10-10-22
L 11-7-22

SHEET NO,
A2.3
i r----o:SYSS--f I
2s---0Fr"-'' ~---------
)
<~111111
.j,- -- .... w, --
- ,,$lll,;cE510[1,:c;- --
.b

EAST ELEVATION
L
+- ----~~-1'.-~_E!_ll.s\~l 94.0 -
+2'•3" T ROOF !::UGE

67.3 IS-'. PiSB 21,USTC,Y
.} -- 10-.1-,~o I "" ISl SlC'i'/-·-
f------=- ''GEN: ----,
1 IJJ FifLAC£,,-,f'!,;AS::;-T- :--- ~ I -- lif'l:'"~~<••a-l·1:·: Stt,-.;:_.:w_ 1-.~,::1 , ,. _...,¾;'<iJ'l:i,;i:!J,ll!fWll.W: I :rn E'TfXIU1f CC((IICCfTl)lSll':SSIUCtC
i[I' r.:MO..'ttF?tJ!:.ffX:3TINmx-~· ,,,_,,,, ! UE•.3f!~ff:'.!iSS-l,WtfiL,f~ I [Ii kffll{l(f(!. i\'i!m# ~d£WOff.\}~
)~ F'.MintDET1ssooo::&wmv,,-cul:itc)tims
l!J !,~WAf.LIVJ,UIJB([l'.P.'.'.NGUITfft
![L lf.:Wfi'.J.iUEt,'{J:0.'Jl/~~¾!Jf,'D-S:ucm
lii'\F.i:CO
Ill' NfW ,_,\$SM! ;·lvll[
j~ !iW!:t!\!ifiO{l':P
i[TIJ !,:\'fOOA?J::?Ol.!l'
:~ WA::.. TOfu:IJ1'.

I
i \. '-' CC 5''8" '\EVA
)

PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
SCALE 1W=TFT
6 UJ :c
u~
Zw
UJ co o-:i:
1-1 z
tr) ::5
LU o a:: VJ
a:: ~ UJ z
~ ~ a:: Sd :c u..
~i
w
0:::
,-f
'<j"
N
::) co Q f- g s::t'
u S; t;::

W < '? u ~
J- . ""~ E t-t<(_E~O
It-t~ ~
u<ed~.E
a:_~cS-~
<( t'. ~ '? -5
~ i ~ J ~ "'
_§ gj - i
f-,=:Q.E Z ~ R·..:: t--( r: "d'
I- in'?
C"°', ~ 0::: r ,-._
~ ~ 0 .......... re
~
11-21-2,
- 5-18·22 ¢ 8-15-2?
~ 11-7-22
L!: 12-5-22
J.,3-10·23
SHEET NO.

A 3.1
+------15-i, i'rS3 MISTGii·;-• ___ ,._
~,,: lil 1
·1,·0··7
EG7S.:i'
1:
:1
" " j L_ ____________ _
,---7
I I
I I
I I L ___ J
7 l "'ilfYO:,D
-------------./,
. WEST ELEVATION_

NORTH ELEVATION

PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
u:GENO
II '~L]~.[JI~JJ1fJLl1(/
[f ·•,ffiXlt"•CQU,.C\lfo··-;rnuc,,•
Ll.! M!.\WE&FL;rt:~•l&~~&ffl!«iDt'i5
[I NtWOccc;&ititi:C.'i~l![,',':~'G
([" fIBJ,()',,:~,JST~G:S<)R&'tis'i=JN-ct•::C::;OPEN;,S
[[' !llW 11 [",'ffiJM s~r,;,, G'JC'R
[[I llt,YPJUllClill\\'lfflrr/;st-,;J.Sl[tC::
]) l/f.'1S11Jrol
'.]J llf.'lfilASSVllJSTP.llll
[In; lk'WG!..'.\~mlffi
(IT !lfNOU.'I Si'Ctf'
E 1/4"=1FT
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
6 UJ J:
u u
z <C
w
LU ca
0 <C
z 1-t
(./) ~ w 0
0::: (/)
0::: w
:::>
UJ z
~ w
~
~ u ,_.
r u..
......
u ~ (/) 0..

T-i
'<:j"
N
w
ex'.
::) C(lQ
f- 0.,,. 0 "
u "'"'
°' "'
w < "' ~~ f- <( "O 00 E "' uo 1-1 .D 00 ~ I ....; ~ ~
<( a~ a u u -- t:
ex'. C 0 "
"'"
~ ·-- <C :;::; 0 "'.i::: ,._ ~ ' u
co .. ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 0 ·-e ,e ..

E fil _: i= .::: o a (J) ---
z , 0 -
2 " "' .,,. 1-1
~~
~ "' f:: c<)
NO '
<C "'
" ~
11-21-21
5·18-22
LJ\8-28-22 10-3-22
~3-10-23
SHEET NO.

A 3.2
\
.~ ~~_l!YSi_
_JO c·J!!)FF~
~;;: '
)>
_J::i. a
• z
f-L ()
(I)
n >
::;;
1;:
11'
::i
-0
b
-0
0 (/)
m
CJ
(/)
m
1-f
0 z
(/)
,k
T
IUJ
m
18 I~
:11;111.ii!i.iol!J
{15'-lf) 2NOFL>tSf.TeACK __
,,,
_llU·0-1.!ST f\~ SETBACK
·1
\ -u---·~1 tV _ _ r ,., \ l.. ~··- - - :'h! e, '' ''101,l'l',KiSd-- g ,~ := "· +
~( c< s;; ,,, '
'.'111- ,'K - ' . \I; __ ,~) ic<~ I~ 1·· \ "" m , c< (- " q ''·!ij'" ~-,, I~ '4l r -
~I I;,.,, l ,. T ,f • t >y
111 '*;~- --•~J, --:;;:--~;····
f)~
6 ,,
1-
lf
1!
I~ §l
l
"E
'"
t.- 1> MARTIN M ARCHITECTURE
Tim Martin A.I.A.
r.r ~C:><f'"f l'JN"-:J/\.)N l\.:>NN".JN 2331 State Stn•et Suit,· 100 Carlsbnd, CJ\ 92008 760-729-3470 (0) 760-729-3473 (F) 858-349-3474 (C)
timqilmartinarchitedure.com
I~
I~
- I
_J!•'.'"_Fi:LSS_
~-0• B;l~ Utt~-
Ul
8 0
z
)>
D1
as
(15'-'Y) iNOfl.f.l.sETeACK_, __
~4")152,_R.RS~A~K
3Nf1~'.i31i!-. - - - ·- -tl1 rll
--- 38!l_; '
- - I [I=\ _/] ·1 __ ,,, ,.
:! --- ·1
~iT
1fil
rr!
=I ii!:
~=1.l :I :
·~1
rrll=I
jf- 11=-
I
j
f
I
ID]
fflF, ix4•¥'/
'.21 gl
::tw1A..':!3t0\:!d
f --
1~
I!
I~
J
, I
} °'~ "T o,c,
I
_j
~L "" - _.

I
___
---r· "'•·t-; - - -1 - ; f

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE., SOLANA BEACH CA
I
I
I~
lill ,,;
I~
lea
_I
16(',/j
M. BEDROOM
r- :!-:=-=---7:1 "J ii II llfAffiO:'I '1
~OVERED PORCH
SECllON C REF.TOSHEETA1.1
_M P£iGHT LIMIT
l '
-15iNSU!.

BE0ROOM2
7 I
I L l6.:!_f'"G1!!_Lf"l{l£~RY1
I,___ --~,----~"''--, ~-_-_-:.,.-_-_-~-:_-_-_-_-_--n~;_ _-,.,--:,_-_--nL _-_-,.,---_-,.,--,--.J.--.,-,~-,----,.,"'..,.-_...J _'-_-:_-' _f<l _-----rr-~-'-"" ~-_-'_'-" rr.LJ -'--~----,-rr-_"-:_-_,,-,..,-,---__,----rr---..,.-,r---~--' '"'---~ .J- .fXJ~ iTi 1 ·=-rr::1:.. ]:G,\LLERY1~m:=!m I I 1!=::msEDROOM 3=m' I -'-'TTT~-1 I ,=:!,-1 •b,-1 ,1:!:lr,' - =m-rn1:!:lm1:!:l-111=1 I I -=u-rn--'--=1 - 1 -- -- · --·--'"'--- - --m=11 =-· ) --------- ----E11STiliGSTRUCTIIPE------------- J
~I ~I
~I ~I
SECTION D REF 10SHLUA2.2
PROPOSED SECTIONS SCALE 1/4"= 1 FT
~ ____ 'i"-'Dl-=ES __
1 1 [nllitfi.!'11\!lrnSIISIJ!!.lllJI
P,llJf 'dJL\TIC', -R-30
!,'lLINS\Jl)TICll(a5 ','/!U)•R-1'
W-IU',)JI.ATIC'C !5''{0i:, R-21
w
a:'.
::::>
1-
u
w
LU
u
z
LU
0 t-1
Cf)
w
ex::
ex::

UJ
(!)
~ r
u
V)
!::; <(
I,_;
u <(
a:'. C
<( :e
IU
~~ z
1--1
~ <(
::E
<(
u
:r:
u
<C
IJ.J
co
<(
z
:5
0 U'l
:-
w
:::::,
z
w
~ u
......

LL
-
~ 0..
..-i
s:!"
N
11-21-21
5•18·22 d':,8·15-22 10-3-22 &, 11-7-22
_£, 12-5·22
SHEET NO.

A4.2
I
11 \I
I
\
!
\
I
\
. \ I I \
· 4RD ~
\ ' ¾-\);
Ii I
/i
I
/
1 I
I
/ ' / i L .J
I
1' 114"/FT.!
EXISTING LOW ROOF fl.Al ROOF {7&, SF)
i
1 I
T
r
I
1-----+------;tJ-!--------
r I
,-------;1\
( EX!Sn'lG ROOF AREA
1 l :X Si!N(, l0W RCt' NiE, co REIJA h1
( EXiST',3 PJGr< 1DOF F:A (TO ~~.!Al~{ \. ! :X STING G~;w;: RJOF Aff:A (TC ?.ft/t>\!t{J I 'c:Al E~SlNG ,,:JF ARt;,/TO P£f,J\IN1
ALTERED&ADDED ROOF ;iii
LOl'i :;of 1.',RED
H;-il,lt"lllC
H!Gl-i ::10F F.'.:','OVE[,
G;',AGE RCJF R,1.".IVEO
PP.OS ~ANAf C~JF
I ;;· ALA i:;iEO 0, JJJDEG
,_._,,.I.QIAl.EfillP BQ.DF@
I LC'//ii,G'
'4~
00 { LAT OOFWI ARAP lj
~-B•1=-z~+-==~c-cj (1620SF)
1565,
i.:20SF
495Sf
187iSF
O''
3c SF 61)S'
72SF ,2w
iS6Sf
I
17'-0' Pl iYP. (B'·O" AFF)
I Afi.A OF ROOF TO 9: FILLED
-~·
----7 I
I
NEW ROOF f:WIING & STAt.'.[LNG SEAM f.!E1K ROOF @EXIST.RO:JFAAEA (TOTALAREA62SF) NE.¥ f/TTAL ROOFING·
-\':W "EPR!DGE" :~ loctS":".!J{)iJiG ~f,J/, Rec: !C~-:StVN .. VAT.J:i 0:?GRT ~SR-34E~ roi:;w~:lW:.J '~'JJA..) FLAT ROOf ~~ .. 'ifl.EX:'it w:,:,;nmc~~Sflffi
C • f'G'.),$.'.
.:~ES--. ~;,1i1.1;_::.1Df.n: :ii"t 1 5:-~: .... u \ST/iJ.L ;11f.WI\. -~:1:l&S :,:::s ,.J:,\!lL-",,tl\fL tf.GA.l _ ff#L /.?I~ jKYUGJll_. Sf,JGHT Gj,ZJHG 'f:1.1!.'lfREC "YP!CAL
:"{'11J{}-:5i'1£_'_''{_' 1.A;','~ Efi-C'?';
SK'iuU:-fS SnALL :!~ 1638 61 Ar~G,tul!:J~fi,\£1!.'J ~RJ,;.;Vny A.1.irye::_.:,,q~t9t,.;~rf~\t!~lJ;~ffiCT!J?,~i ~==~~W1'f1J._3,~~ <1.ATW:,;-1.)'tE:~CT~Jl\.~.:;NCY ~- SHO\', _}liJ~:,:E V/i i.!','A/W:;:;.1r,,,: :DI/IS2 A«O ")J)H=\M.N t. ~:JR8f~~rntP,_:fASL::Rs_.::::ct.n:·, w :r:
u~
Z LU
w co
0~
1-f ::i
CJ) 0 w (,/) ~
~
w
~ :c
~
LU
:::,
z
w
~
8 u..
a..
~
11·21-21
5-18-22 LI::. 8-15~2?
i,1n-22
&, ~2-5~22

PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
NORTH SCALE 114"=1FT SHEET NO.

A 5.1
i',IN-~\
::o I ~' \ :t I' ~ry ~~
)> ~ m
O"I ~ 0 ........
3:
2=;
z
r
~ m
.--
'n m
~ IC
IZ IG)
ml ""CJ
~~ :.: z ii
"TI
-j
I
i
~~bl~
..,_J.rbt:U~ -
» GSt~U~
15'1'EAR6LUFF P,ETREAT) _)
~.e"):tWA.OOOScl!!.).CI<
--2:._-0"J1SiFLOOOSETM.CK
I
~ ~
I
/
~-
ij
;a::
al
I~ I!
,..
~~
~
-1
_I
)
lJI
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\:-I -IGl X q>
I \i:_i~~
.~ OJJ
I \ -< I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
~
"
,.
,J-O')AU.Jio\\BlEGARAGE.SETMCK
Alw11MLE1Sr FLOOR 1ricREMEIITALS:.TBA~ ,.~!ER t7 :c C»OI ~-, J
b'~
~-f
en~ ~"'
t\:IN "'~
L
ojt

MARTIN M ARCHITECTURE
Tim Martin A.I.A.
2333 State Street Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008
760-729-3470 (0) 760-729-3473 (F) 858-349-3474 (C)
[email protected]
-11
r-
?iq
~Ii! 5;0
,;
J009 _____ _
7 II
I
I
L
' I ~ C
-~I ~ ~ ~ ·, g ri z 8 I Q < @ m
-TJ--
)
'0
JJ
~-IE
l"Ji5 0
,::

I
*
~
~~
' I --i---
I n <\!l
lL _ - ~\~- - 7-~~-~
[x1
~
~
I
- -- - - - - f I 'I
I
'"' -<.,., •.•• ,J.-----------J I&~ ;:?) 191:J: i\ I~
----~-=J·rn:....:=•
-~ 1 lli
:n
l I~ ~ ' ~ -
~==~=~r'i= Jll I:
al
Ii
m
~---- □
·i,;,1: i'io ·O
w ~1@
I
I
$
----- _ _J

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE., SOLANA BEACH CA
z
0 :::0
-j
::r:

C
-0
-0
rn
;:o
r
~ rn
r
n
rn
1-4
i::;
z
~ G)
~ -0
~~ =i z
)> ~ m
Q"\ ~ • z NP
tl','i:Of!ll~
I .10·05 ----- 7
~ ---- 1
/ ~ '-- I
--r--
" // /, r - --- ------=-=--- - -----==-==f::;-:~~~,~- // / / / / / , s "';:., "''-,, -... ~ //<;);/~ I~ ~ t.l;: -"~i?1·_ '-1~~11-i ,/ . // "' ,,1~ I , 'I / u . -b.1 . -I 11 /, !ii:D JI 1• Q I ! 1:
0 ~ : · 11[ I '
~·-- ,;'=-- - l1, + '---.. II Ill 1 J, .i
-1.-/fllltlf~-~-
§ii
~i
k
1i
11i-l1
--L___
- ~~ S3LSflCACKl;,0
1STt:W.f!lL:'' ltEfflE~' /
J
__ \'~'.·0-PID"lOOR:S~CK __
___ i•1.o,1s:FtOO,,:!trP,cr.. __
(P9· :l'l030C'SJ
!:'·~
q>~·
~~
NrD
I\)_,
ij
"' al
I~
L
\
I
\
\
I
I
\
\
I
I
I
I
L_~
I
~ --~
\
\
\
/
I
I
\
\
\
\
nl~

MARTIN M ARCHITECTURE
Tim Martin A.I.A.
2311 State Street Suill' 100 Carlsbad, Cl\ 92008
760-729-3470 (0) 760-729-3473 (F) 858-349-3474 (C)
[email protected]
ll~
1:01;
D
m
t)l ,~g I 'g
I
$
-kl;
fi1g ~
"'
I"!
ril
~
s
~
_ _J 'M,£5 JI 'N ,OS

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
----------
241 PACIFIC AVENUE., SOLANA BEACH CA I
Geotechnical C Geologic C Coastal C Environmental
5741 Palmer Way C Carlsbad, California 92010 C (760) 438-3155 C FAX (760) 931-0915 C www.geosoilsinc.com February 18, 2022
Revised July 19, 2022
W.O. 8278-A-SC
Mr. Rick Schrager
241 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California 92075
Subject: Limited Geotechnical Evaluation for Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263-312-12-00
Dear Mr. Schrager:

In accordance with your request and authorization, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), is providing this summary of our limited geotechnical evaluation of the impact of the proposed improvements to the single-family residence on the existing bluff, at the subject site. The purpose of this study was to provide a general, qualitative site evaluation for the proposed improvement, as it relates to the stability of the nearby coastal bluff. The scope of our services for this study included: 1) a review of in-house regional geologic maps and available literature (see the Appendix); 2) brief site reconnaissance and observations of the surficial site conditions; 3) review of the architectural plans ; and 4) the preparation of this summary letter and accompaniments.

SITE CONDITIONS
The subject property is located at 241 Pacific Avenue in Solana Beach, San Diego County, California. The site is situated upon a developed, steeply westerly sloping coastal terrace, adjacent to an approximately 75-foot high coastal bluff, along the Pacific Ocean shoreline.

The coastal bluff consists of a steep, west-facing, somewhat anthropogenically modified slope. According to a geotechnical report by Soil Engineering Construction Inc. (SEC, 2019), the natural bluff was inclined greater than 45 degrees from the horizontal and friable sand was exposed at elevations 25 to 35 feet (NAV88) which was contributing to the destabilization of the bluff. The upper coastal bluff slope is sparsely vegetated due to rilling and sloughing of the bluff face and a recent slope failure and erosion. As a result of that failure, a 35-foot high seawall has been constructed, as recommended in SEC (2019).

From Google Earth Imagery (2020), the beach sand elevation, near the toe of the bluff, is approximately 10 feet above the approximate mean low tide elevation. In general, the top of slope is 85 feet (NAV88), the bottom is at about 10 ft. (NAV88), and the beach extends toward the ocean about 75 feet to the mean high tide line elevation of 4.41 (NAV88).

GeoSoils, Inc.

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
GSI understands that the proposed remodel consists of mostly interior improvements and some exterior improvements to the existing residence, as depicted in the architectural plans by Martin Architecture (MA, 2021). The improvements include removal of the existing interior winding staircase and replacing it with a conventional switchback staircase, remodeling the master bedroom area and closet, reducing the size of Bedroom 3 on the main level, adding a powder room and pantry, removal of a small portion of the roof, and construction of a new lanai adjacent the existing garage. Other than the lanai, no additional square footage is proposed. New foundations are proposed for the lanai, an exposed accessory structure near the street (Pacific Avenue) and east of the Geologic Setback Line (GSL). Retrofitting of the existing foundation is planned at several locations east of the 40-foot setback line. This will consist of six footings for new posts to facilitate floor framing adjustments and two footings for shear walls for seismic upgrades. The retrofitting will replace the existing footings and not add any new loads. The lanai is outboard (east) of the GSL, and has no effect on bluff stability.

GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
Regional Geology
The subject property lies within the coastal plains physiographic section of San Diego County. This section consists of dissected, mesa-like terraces that transition inland to rolling hills. San Diego County occurs within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of southern California. This province is characterized as elongated mountain ranges and valleys that trend northwesterly (Norris and Webb, 1990). The Peninsular Ranges extend from the base of the east-west aligned Santa Monica - San Gabriel Mountains, and continue south into Baja California. The mountain ranges within this province are underlain by basement rocks consisting of pre-Cretaceous metasedimentary rocks, Jurassic metavolcanic rocks, and Cretaceous plutonic (granitic) rocks.

In the Southern California region, deposition occurred during the Cretaceous Period and Cenozoic Era in the continental margin of a forearc basin. Sediments, derived from Cretaceous-age plutonic rocks and Jurassic-age volcanic rocks, were deposited during the Tertiary Period (Eocene-age) into the narrow, steep, coastal plain and continental margin of the basin. These rocks have been uplifted, eroded, and deeply incised. During early Pleistocene time, a broad coastal plain was developed from the deposition of marine terrace deposits (now termed “old paralic deposits”). During mid- to late-Pleistocene time, this plain was uplifted, eroded and incised. Alluvial deposits have since filled the lower valleys, and young marine sediments are currently being deposited/eroded within coastal and beach areas.

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc.

Site Geology
Regional geologic mapping by Kennedy and Tan (2007) indicates the site is mantled by Quaternary-age old paralic deposits. These deposits are shown as being unconformably underlain by sedimentary bedrock belonging to the Tertiary Torrey Sandstone. According to SEC, (2019) the Torrey Sandstone lies nearly flat at the site. Beach deposits consisting variably of unconsolidated sand to cobble exist from the toe of the bluff to the coastline.

GEOLOGIC SETBACK LINE DETERMINATION
The City’s relevant policy regarding the Geologic Setback Line (GSL), is as follows:

Policy 4.25: All new bluff property development shall be set back from the bluff edge a sufficient distance to ensure that it will not be in danger from erosion and that it will ensure stability for its projected 75-economic life. To determine the GSL, applications for bluff property development must include a geotechnical report, from a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or a certified Engineering Geologist, that establishes the Geologic Setback Line (GSL) for the proposed development. This setback line shall establish the location on the bluff top where stability can be reasonably assured for the economic life of the development. Such assurance will take the form of a quantitative slope analysis demonstrating a minimum factor of safety against sliding of 1.5 (static) or 1.2 (pseudostatic, k=0.15 or determined through analysis by the geotechnical engineer), using shear strength parameters derived from relatively undeformed samples collected at the site. In no case shall the setback be less than 40 feet from the bluff edge, and only if it can be demonstrated that the structure will remain stable, as defined above, at such a location for its 75-year economic life and has been sited safely without reliance on existing or future bluff retention devices, other than a caisson foundation.

Recently, GSI has performed quantitative slope stability analyses for nearby bluff projects, including 216 Neptune Ave., and 529 Pacific Ave. (see Appendix A), in the Encinitas-Solana Beach area, for the purpose of determining the GSL, as outlined above. Quantitative analyses of the bluffs were performed, and subsequently approved by the geotechnical reviewer for the City. For these projects, the approved GSL, which includes the future 75-year bluff erosion rate (increased for Sea Level Rise), was 51 feet from the bluff top. For this current project, a distance of 55 feet from the bluff top has been evaluated for 241 Pacific Avenue as satisfying the criteria of having a static factor of safety of 1.5 (this does not include the future erosion rate, which is additive to this distance). This will aid in calculating the GSL, once the future erosion rates have been determined (see below).

COASTAL BLUFF GEOMORPHOLOGY
Emery and Kuhn (1982) developed a global system of classification of coastal bluff profiles, and applied that system to the San Diego County coastline from San Onofre State Park to Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 3
GeoSoils, Inc.
the southern tip of Point Loma. Emery and Kuhn (1982) designated the Solana Beach coastline as “active” and “Type C-c.” The letter “C” designates coastal bluffs having a resistant geologic formation along the base of the bluff and more erodible earth materials in the upper portions of the bluff. The relative effectiveness of marine erosion compared to subaerial erosion of the bluff produces a characteristic profile. The letter “-c” indicates that the long-term rate of marine erosion is approximately equal to that of subaerial erosion. This aids in determining the historic bluff retreat rate (see below).

HISTORIC COASTAL-BLUFF RETREAT
Most of San Diego County’s coastline has experienced a measurable amount of erosion in the last 75 years, with more rapid erosion occurring during periods of heavy storm surf (Kuhn and Shepard, 1984). The entire base of the seacliff portion of coastal bluffs is based upon the available information, the use of a 6.4-foot rise in sea level over the design life of the proposed improvements to the property is fairly conservative (0.5% probability that SLR exceeds this amount [CCC, 2018]). Due to the relatively high elevation of the existing and proposed development (approximately ±76 to ±86 feet NAVD88), it is considered reasonably safe from coastal hazards including shoreline erosion, wave attack, wave overtopping and coastal flooding, even with a conservative sea level rise of 6.4 feet over the 75-year life of the development (0.5% probability that SLR exceeds this amount, per CCC [2018]), from 2019 to 2094 (year 2094 extrapolated from 2090 to 2100 data). The existing seawall below the subject site would provide additional protection from coastal hazards. exposed to direct wave attack along most of the coast. The waves erode the seacliff by impact on small joints/fractures and fissures in the otherwise essentially massive bedrock units, and by water-hammer effects. The upper bluffs, which often support little or no vegetation, are subject to wave spray and splash, sometimes causing saturation of the outer layer and subsequent sloughing of over-steepened slopes. Wind, rain, irrigation, and uncontrolled surface runoff contribute to the subaerial erosion of the upper coastal bluff, especially on the more exposed over-steepened portions of the friable sands. Where these processes are active, unraveling of cohesionless sands has occurred along portions of the upper bluffs. Finally, improvements sited near the bluff edge can concentrate surface runoff onto the bluff slope, and can contribute to subaerial erosion and bluff instability.

Numerous studies have been undertaken to analyze coastal bluff retreat along the Encinitas and Solana Beach shoreline. However, the most in-depth study to date, consists of a 1999 assessment by Benumof and Griggs (1999). This study presents erosion rates for coastal bluffs in different sections of the San Diego County coastline. The erosion rates published by these workers were obtained by analyzing a combination of factors including overall rock mass strengths obtained through Schimdt Hammer testing; visual assessments of joint spacing and width; earth material weathering and fatigue; groundwater seepage; and wave impact at the seacliff.

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 4
GeoSoils, Inc.

For the Solana Beach coast section, which includes the subject site, Benumof and Griggs (1999) arrived at a mean recession rate of 8.23 cm/yr (3.24 in/yr), or approximately

0.27 ft/yr, with a standard deviation of 2.37 cm/yr (0.93 in/yr or 0.077 ft/yr). Benumof and Griggs (1999) also provided alongshore plots quantifying the amount of coastal erosion within their Solana Beach study area. Their findings indicated a site specific approximate retreat rate of 6 cm/yr (2.36 inches/yr) or approximately 0.1966 ft/yr for the subject site, in an unprotected state (i.e., no bluff retention device).

GSI also reviewed 500-scale aerial photos (Appendix B) provided by EDR (2022), from 2016, 2012, 2009, 2005, 2002, 1997, 1994, 1990, 1985, 1979, 1970, 1966, 1964, 1953, 1949, 1946, 1939, and 1928 (typing “ctrl + shift + 8" should delete outline of site), as well as oblique aerial photos for the years 1972, 1979, 1987, 1989, 1993, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2013 (from www.californiacoastline.org) . Our review is summarized below:

TABLE 1 - HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW SUMMARY

DATE SUMMARY SCALE
1928 Pacific Ave. is present as a dirt road east of the site, and there are a few dirt roads in the vicinity. The site itself appears natural, and the bluff is sparsely vegetated, with a moderate growth of vegetation (grasses/weeds?) elsewhere. There are about 5 homes on the bluff in the immediate vicinity.
1"=500'
1939 There is a round house (?), on the lot north of the site, and vegetation appears to have been trimmed, a small tree is present, otherwise the site and area are similar to the 1929 photo.
1"=500'
1946 There are now 8 houses on the bluff in the vicinity. Site vegetation appears to be managed, and a tree is present, otherwise, the subject site appears similar to the 1939 photograph. A gunite apron may be present on the bluff, to the south, and/or that area is denuded/eroded. Pacific Ave. may be paved. Increased regional urbanization.
1"=500'
1949 Increased urbanization in the region, the bluff appears sparsely vegetated, otherwise, the subject site appears similar to the 1946 photograph. Pacific Ave. appears paved. 1"=500'
1953 The subject site appears similar to the 1949 photograph, with increased single-family residential development in the region noted. A residence has been constructed on the lot. Otherwise, the bluff and site are similar to the 1949 photograph. 1"=500'
1964 The subject site appears similar to the 1953 photograph; however, there is a residence built on the lot to the south. The bluff appears sparsely vegetated.

Increased regional urbanization.
1"=500'
1966 The subject property appears very similar to the 1964 photograph. 1"=500' 1970 A small gunite/denuded area is present on the bluff on the lot to the south.

Otherwise, the bluff and site appear similar to the 1966 photograph. Increased urbanization in the region.
1"=500'
1972 Similar to the 1970 photo, with the gunite apron noted on the lot to the south of the site. A small “avalanche chute” is present below the gunite on the offsite lot to the south. Otherwise, the bluff appears to exhibit no signs of increased erosion.

Oblique
Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 5
GeoSoils, Inc.

TABLE 1 - HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW SUMMARY

DATE SUMMARY SCALE
1979 The subject site appears similar to the 1972 photograph. Increased residential density in the region.
1"=500'
1979 There appears to be a fairly continuous, localized (continuous to ±6 lots to the north and 1 to 2 lots to the south), denuded area, about 5 to 10 feet high, at the top of the bluff. Otherwise, the bluff appears to exhibit no signs of increased erosion. This is most likely due to the steep inclination of the upper bluff.

Oblique
1985 Similar to the 1979 photograph. Otherwise, the bluff appears to exhibit no signs of increased erosion.
1"=500'
1987 Similar to the 1985 photograph. Otherwise, the bluff appears to exhibit no signs of increased erosion.

Oblique
1989 Similar to the 1987 photograph. Otherwise, the bluff appears to exhibit no signs of increased erosion.

Oblique
1990 The site and surrounding properties appear similar to the 1985 photograph, with increased regional residential density. The bluff appears to exhibit no signs of increased erosion.
1"=500'
1993 The site and surrounding properties appear similar to the 1989 photograph, with increased regional residential density. The bluff appears to exhibit no signs of increased erosion.

Oblique
1994 The site and surrounding properties appear similar to the 1990 photograph, with increased regional residential density. The bluff appears to exhibit no signs of increased erosion.
1"=500'
1997 Small avalanche chutes appear present on the bluff, with a small discontinuous one below the subject property. The area south of the offsite gunite on the lot next door (south) has a larger denuded area on the bluff. Otherwise, the site and surrounding properties appear similar to the 1994 photograph.
1"=500'
2002 The site and surrounding properties appear similar to the 1997 photograph, and vegetation appears to have subdued the small avalanche chutes present on the bluffs, including the subject site.
1"=500'
2004 A gunite ditch/downdrain or jute mesh about 3 to 5 feet wide, appears present on the bluff face, emanating from the common property line of the site and lot to the north.

A small bluff failure on the lot to the north was noted, and it appears to have been repaired with a pipe and board/sand bag (difficult to discern) system. The failure appears to have extended onto the subject lot, as a small scarp and debris train are present. The scarp appears to extend under the porch on the bluff. There appears to have been a surficial bluff failure below the southerly margin of the subject lot, with small scarp and debris train present. Two lots to the south, there appears to have been a wall constructed on the bluff face, at the top, and the lower-middle bluff appears to have been planted. The slope appears reconstructed to some degree on the 2nd and 3rd lots to the south. A sea cave two lots to the south may have been infilled. The toe of the gunite apron on the lot to the south is failing. A seawall is present at the toe of the bluff, two lots to the north, extending to the north.

Oblique
2005 The subject site and surrounding areas appear similar to the 2002 photograph. Bluff appears largely the same.
1"=500'
Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 6
GeoSoils, Inc.

TABLE 1 - HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW SUMMARY

DATE SUMMARY SCALE
2006 Hay bales appear to have been placed in the avalanche chute near the northern margin of the subject lot. The aforementioned surficial bluff failure on the southern margin of the site has enlarged, and has been infilled with sand bags. The sea cave south of the site has definitely been infilled. Jute mesh covers the bluffs in several offsite areas. Otherwise, similar to the 2004 photograph.

Oblique
2008 The surficial failure on the southern margin of the site has enlarged, and the offsite gunite apron also appears to be moving, as evidenced by blocks of concrete. There appears to be a scarp on each end of the porch on the bluff at the subject site.

Otherwise, similar to the 2006 photograph.

Oblique
2009 The site and other surrounding properties were similar to the 2005 photograph; however, the bluff appears denuded to some degree, or possibly reconstructed? Otherwise, similar to the 2005 photograph.
1"=500'
2010 The aforementioned porch has been removed, at least partially, and the bluff below the site is denuded, with partially exposed vertical circular forms (caissons?) exposed in the bluff face, below the zone 5-10 foot denuded zone (discussed in the 1979 photo). Otherwise, similar to the 2008 photograph.

Oblique
2012 The subject site and adjacent properties appear similar to the 2009 photograph. 1"=500' 2013 A seawall, extending to the south, has been constructed two lots south of the site.

Otherwise, similar to the 2010 photograph.

Oblique
2016 The subject site and adjacent properties appear similar to the 2012 photograph. 1"=500' There was no discernible marine or aerial erosion noted prior to 1997. GSI was unable to discern any surface area (plan view) lost to erosion since the lot was legally recorded (1923 [Martin Architecture, 2021]), until after about 2005. Subsequently, GSI estimates that about 3 to 5 linear feet of the bluff may have failed along the top of the bluff, equivalent to approximately 150 to 250 square feet of lost lot area.

This corresponds to bluff retreat of about 3 to 5 feet during the period 1928 to 2005 (77 years), or about 0.039 to 0.065 feet/yr. For conservatism, we will use the previously deduced historical rate of ± 0.1966 ft/yr for the subject site, in an unprotected state (i.e., no bluff retention device).

Existing Bluff Retention
On March 7, 2019, the California Coastal Commission (CCC) granted a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) to the coastal zone containing 241 and 245 Pacific Avenue, primarily owing to threats to the 241 Pacific Avenue and 249 Pacific Avenue properties originating from the unprotected and failing coastal bluff section below 245 Pacific Avenue (SEC, 2019). This consisted of constructing a 100-foot long, 35-foot high, 28-inch thick seawall, with a superjacent geogrid structure on the bluff face.

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 7
GeoSoils, Inc.

On June 16, 2021, the CCC granted another CDP to the coastal zone containing 235, 241, 245, and 249 Pacific Avenue, for reconstruction of failed sections of the coastal bluff associated with the first CDP. This was just recently completed. Having been recently completed, the wall is in good shape. With regard to Policy # 4.17 which states (in part):
“...On lots with a legally established bluff retention device, the required geologic analysis shall describe the condition of the existing seawall; identify any impacts it may be having on public access and recreation, scenic views, sand supply and other coastal resources; and evaluate options to mitigate any previously unmitigated impacts of the structure or modify, replace or remove the existing protective device in a manner that would eliminate or reduce those impacts. In addition, any significant alteration or improvement to the existing structure shall trigger such review (i.e., the analysis of the seawall) and any unavoidable impacts shall be mitigated.

As indicated above, the wall is in good shape. Further, as part of the approval process, the applicant previously would have had to address potential impacts of the wall, including public access and recreation, scenic views, sand supply and other coastal resources, as well as evaluate the impacts of the structure that might modify, replace or remove the seawall, in order to gain approval for the CDPs. In that regard, nothing has changed significantly since the issuance of the CDPs. Regardless of the above, historic erosion rates are for an unprotected bluff face.

FUTURE BLUFF RETREAT SUMMARY
The calculated long-term rate of future bluff retreat using the simplified numerical model equation is presented below, based on the aforementioned three curvilinear sections and:

1. Unprotected historical rate based on this site specific review is 0.1966 feet/year = R1

2. Avg SLR rate over 91 years (1924 to 2015), based on NOAA (Scripps Pier, La Jolla1) is 2.13 mm/yr = 0.084 inch/yr x 1 ft/12 in = 0.007 ft/yr = S1

3. Future SLR rate (2097), under medium-high risk aversion scenario2 = 6.68 ft/75 yrs = 0.089 ft/yr=S2

4. m = a
Similar to 216 Neptune and 529 Pacific Ave., GSI’s assignment of the value for the exponent “m” is reasonable based on the response of the onsite coastal bluff to increased rates of SLR would lie somewhere between the instant response (m =1) and no feedback (m=0) systems discussed in Ashton, et al. (2011), and is likely closer to zero. 1NOAA, 2022 (La Jolla gauge no. 9410230)
2CCC, 2018 (Projected SLR [in feet]: La Jolla [extrapolated from 2090 to 2100, for 2097]) Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 8
GeoSoils, Inc.

GSI has reasonably assumed SLR will mimic the historical bluff retreat rate for the next 37 years (through 2059). We have used 0.1966 ft/yr for this time interval. The erosion rate should marginally increase for the following 25 years (2059-2084), and we have reasonably added a of the change in erosion rate in 2097, to the initial erosion rate (), see below).

During the more asymptotic Sea Level Rise (SLR) end of the 75-year design life (2084-2097), the bluff retreat rate should be closer to the site specific upper bound bluff retreat rate for this time interval. The site specific historic bluff erosion rate (assuming the existing seawall is not there), is indicated in the calculations below:

Site Specific Rate
At year 2097, under medium-high risk aversion scenario (0.5% Probability), R2 = R1 (S2/S1)
m
R2
= (0.1966 ft/yr) (0.089 ft/yr/[ 0.007 ft/yr ])a
R2 = (0.1966) (12.71)a
R2 = (0.1966) (2.33) =0.458 ft/yr in the year 2097.

Based on the above, the unprotected retreat rate will change from 0.1966 to 0.458ft/yr, and the difference between the 75-year commencement and end of the design life, )=

0.261 ft/yr, from 2022 to 2097.

FUTURE UNPROTECTED BLUFF RETREAT BASED ON SLR CURVE INCREMENTS

APPLICABLE DATES
BLUFF

RETREAT

RATE (FT/YR)

DURATION
(YEARS)
BLUFF

RETREAT
(FEET)
2022-2058 (0.1966) current SLR rate 0.1966 37 7.27
2059-2083 (0.1966 + a[)] = (0.1966 +a[0.261]= 0.283)
increase in SLR rate 0.283 25 7.08
2084-2097 (Calculated SLR rate in 2097 = 0.458) 0.458 13 5.95 Subtotal 75 20.30

SETBACK FROM BLUFF EDGE (GSL)
Erosion over 75 years 20.30
Factor of Safety (FOS) = 1.5 distance from bluff edge 55.00 TOTAL OVERALL SETBACK FROM BLUFF EDGE (GSL) 75.30
As shown above, the unprotected onsite coastal bluff may experience approximately 20 feet of retreat over the 75-year design life of the proposed residential structure, with a future SLR of 6.68 feet (assuming the existing seawall is not there). Plate 1 shows a typical Factor of Safety (FOS) setback distance, where FOS=1.5, amounting to 55 feet, based on the approximately 20 feet of bluff retreat over 75 years, with an assumed SLR of approximately 6.68 feet over that design life interval.

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 9
GeoSoils, Inc.

FINDINGS
Based upon our understanding of the proposed development, our site observations, review of the available regional geologic information, and knowledge of the bluff conditions in the site vicinity, we provide the following findings:
• With one exception, the proposed exterior improvements do not include the construction of new foundations, however, new foundations are proposed for the lanai, in the area that is both east of the 40-foot prescriptive bluff edge setback, and the cumulative FOS = 1.5 distance plus the 75 year erosion rate distance setback, (GSL), near Pacific Avenue. However, we note that the lanai is considered an exposed accessory structure, which typically does not have a design life, and should generally not be subjected to such criteria.
• The proposed improvements would not subject the coastal bluff to significant additional building loads beyond the existing building loads, present onsite, prior to the remodel. Based on personal communication with the structural engineer at Patterson Engineering, Curtis Patterson, the estimated weight of exterior and interior materials replacing the old building materials or new construction is similar to or less than the pre-remodel material weight.

CONCLUSIONS
Based upon our findings and our understanding of the proposed development under purview of this study, GSI concludes that the coastal bluff below the subject property is susceptible to erosion from both marine and sub-areal processes. Given that the replacement building materials are of near to equal weight than the original building materials being replaced, it is our professional opinion that this remodel/development improvements will not further exacerbate bluff erosion or instability. As such, GSI will certify3 the following:
• The proposed remodel/development will neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area or in any way require the construction of protective devices that would substantially alter natural landforms along bluffs and cliffs.
• The proposed remodel/development does not restrict or reduce public access or beach use.
• The proposed remodel/development places no significant additional weight on the coastal bluff and has no adverse effect on the stability of the bluff. 3 The term "certify" is used herein as defined in Division 3, Chapter 7, Article 3, § 6735.5. of the California Business and Professions Code (2021).

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 10
GeoSoils, Inc.
• The proposed remodel/development does not endanger life or property. • The lower section of the bluff was recently improved with a seawall approximately 35 feet high and therefore, the lower bluff stability was increased substantially from pre-wall construction slope conditions.

PLAN REVIEW
The architectural plans by MA (2021) were reviewed and found to be general compliance with the standards of practice for construction within the City of Solana Beach, and are satisfactory from a geotechnical viewpoint.

LIMITATIONS
Inasmuch as this report is based upon our visual inspection and reviews of regional geologic information, the conclusions and recommendations are considered professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty, either express or implied, is given. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others, or their inaction; or work performed when GSI is not requested to be onsite. Use of this report constitutes an agreement and consent by the user to all the limitations outlined above, notwithstanding any other agreements that may be in place.

The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Respectfully submitted,
GeoSoils, Inc.,
John P. Franklin Stephen J. Coover
President, CEG 1340 Geotechnical Engineer, GE 2057
JPF/SJC/TMP/sh
Enclosure: Appendix - References
Plate 1 - Bluff Retreat Map
Distribution: (1) Addressee (via email)
Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach Revised July 19, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 11
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX

REFERENCES
Adelman, Kenneth & Gabrielle, 2019, California Coastal Records Project, photos 10-23- 2004, 10-19-2006, 9-19-2008, and 9-29-2013.

California Coastal Commission, 2018, Sea level rise policy guidance, interpretive guidelines for addressing sea level rise in local coastal programs and coastal development permits, adopted November 7.

Eisenberg, L.T., 1985, Pleistocene faults and marine terraces, northern San Diego County, in Abbott, P.L., ed., On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in Northern San Diego County: San Diego Association of Geologists.

Emery, K.O., and Kuhn, G.G., 1982, Sea cliffs: their processes, profiles, and classification:

Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 93, no 7.

GeoPacifica, 2022a, Review of Preliminary Geotechnical investigation, 216 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California, dated June 9.
_____, 2022b, Response to Surfrider Comment Letter of October 19, 2021 Proposed Residential Addition 529 Pacific Avenue, DRP 19-101 Solana Beach, California, dated April 11.

GeoSoils, Inc., 2022, Geotechnical Update and Response to Review Comments, Proposed Residential Remodel, 529 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, W.O. S7719.1,Coastal Development Permit Application # 6-21- 0758, dated March 11
_____, 2021, Geotechnical Response to “Review of ‘Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, 216 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California,’” dated February 6, 2021, by GeoPacifica, W.O. 7557-A5-SC, dated April 13.
_____, 2020, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, 216 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, San Diego County, California 92024, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 256-352-18-00, W.O. 7557-A-SC, dated April 14. _____, 2000, Preliminary geotechnical evaluation and bluff study, 210 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, San Diego County, California, W.O. 2915-A-SC, dated August 14. _____, 2019, Preliminary geotechnical set back evaluation, proposed residential addition, 529 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263-041-02-00, W.O. S7719-SC, dated October 25.

Google Earth Imagery, 2020, v.6.1.0.5001, copyright by Europa Technologies, aerial photo dated December.

GeoSoils, Inc.

Kennedy, M.P., and Tan, SS., 2007, Geologic map of the Oceanside 30' by 60' quadrangle, California, regional geologic map series, scale 1:100,000, California Geological Survey, Map No. 2.

Martin Architecture, 2021, Architectural plans, Schrager Residence, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana, California, sheets C1.1, C1.2, EX 1.1, EX1.2, EX1.3, EX3.1, EX3.2, EX4.1, EX5.1, D1.1, D1.2, D1.3, D5.1, D6.1, A1.0, A1.1, A1.2, A1.3, A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A3.1, A3.2, A4.1, A4.2, A5.1, A6.1, A6.2, A8.1, S1.0, S1.1, S1.3, S2.0, S2.1, S2.2, S2.3, S2.4, S2.5, S3.00, S3.10, S3.20, S3.30, S4.0, S4.1, S4.2, M1.1, M1.2, E1.1, E1.2, E2.1, and E2.2, dated November 21.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2022, https://tidesandcurrents.noaa. gov/sltrends/sltrends.html
Norris, R.M. and Webb, R.W., 1990, Geology of California, second edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Soil Engineering Construction Inc., 2019, Updated geotechnical evaluation of coastal bluff, proposed seawall extensions 235, 241, 245, and 249 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, CA, dated October 7.

Mr. Rick Schrager Appendix A
File:wp21\8200\8278a.rlge Page 2
W.O. 8278-A-SC DATE: 05/22 SCALE: 1" = 10'
Revised Plate 1

BLUFF RETREAT MAP

ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
This document or efile is not a part of the Construction Documents and should not be relied upon as being an
accurate depiction of design.
75 YEAR

BLUFF RETREAT
BLUFF EDGE F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT
(GSL)

TYPICAL
F.O.S.=1.5
40' SETBACK

FROM BLUFF TOP
0 GRAPHIC SCALE
10 5 10 20
1" = 10'
N
2STORY
1 STORY (BELOW) I GARAGE (BELOW) I
I
t---25'-il RYS:
~ _ --_ ---1"7,:===::=:::I==~======?--------} 103' ? 78° 07'E. •+-+-+~-+-?+-! ~t-+ ....I,=~- .i..,.:~-+.....i..:::::: +-,11.,,_..._ --------+"l!=; ;;:; ~?;;:;,rt=, :::::::==::::ii I I I I I ''"•'· 1.. I , ,-1·-r 5'-0" svss ,r~''.\ ,, _ _ "..:;;.-1 - II TRASH ELr~.JlANEL ~ , I I t I +n-J r 1, rr _ , //, q
p- - l I / / l I T l r-- -- --~ -~ --r~, ,-: ----+-----------------H 1 1
I i I I I I ~ E ~1rn JG G ,R \G = / ~ : ~
I , , , ~~ 1 rr 1 ~ : ~ I 1:1 I / I I I \ ~ 3:12 I /.~ I ...-i------.NEWSTANDINISEAM I I
I\ ~ /o/ I METALROF
I I ~I \ 4--------1 ' ~ 1// I ~ :

I I I I ; I/ I /// " " I :
□ \ 1 ✓ I~ ; k1/ I "~ 1
I : EXlsl-lNG SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1
1 ~
1 / ~ 1 ~ I "~J ; __ 10,
8 ,,
I I I I 241 PACIFICAAVENUE ~~ 1
I I SOLONA BEACH, CA I I I I ~~ :

I APN #263-312-12 1 j ~~
I I I I 11 L - - - - ~ - - - ~ - ~ - -~ ~~ "" ---
1 STORY : I 2 STORY - L I /I IX "" I I '\
I L I I ~ I • 1// \ 'I : 1 I', ,, 1 1 o
I ,- : I ~ )' : : Ir,'·
I I -f-l!clL '" ,, ~~ C \
~ 1, ' ,, I ,, _, Tl I:,~ 'r--- '-
I E~ ST. PORCH ,, 111-++------,H!'I ' ----. -----t:::
6 -- 1 - --=-==-=---•~ - - - - - I \ I Ii ::,1- ' '" ' ,, =t.VZ ;:-~~ 1 1 1 / 1 j"r- I \1
EXIST. CONCRETE EXIST; ~ I \ " ",, ~ \\ O /)
PATIO L TURF A\ EA EXIST. I \ ~; ~ I '\ \ ,.. ~
- 5'+;,H-- s_PA I I ►~ □□ -=- r r- ~ f .{ '~/;
L_ - --- -- ~~~~~~_,,, ;ii,E;;;;? _______ ~ ___ ,_ ~__, ?- - - ? - --- --- ~ \ ~~~~~1 ~2==1~ 1 E S~ WA ERMETER I ~ · --------;--· / o~' N. 78° 07' E. • · · - I I I I I ~\ ~I --~I_ -~-----~-~___.I 1!1~~1 ~ I !11 I _ en ct: 1£1 @ ~ !;::
co I EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1 ~@ 01 ~I ~I ~ l 1 STORY
C)
~ _.J
""'1"" co SITE PLAN rJj
BASE MAP FROM:

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA CA
w
:::::,
z
w
~ (.)
u:::

B
<(
a..

I ,5~1
Geotechnical C Geologic C Coastal C Environmental
5741 Palmer Way C Carlsbad, California 92010 C (760) 438-3155 C FAX (760) 931-0915 C www.geosoilsinc.com August 15, 2022 W.O. 8278-A2-SC
Mr. Rick Schrager
241 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California 92075
Subject: Geotechnical Addendum and Response to Coastal Commission Review Comments (August 3, 2022), Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263-312-12-00, Coastal Development Review
Application #6-22-0551/Schrager
Dear Mr. Schrager:

In accordance with your request and authorization, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), is providing this geotechnical addendum to our limited geotechnical evaluation of the subject property (GSI, 2022). The purpose of this addendum is to address the California Coastal Commission (CCC) Review comment no. 5, included in CCC (2022), which requires the delineation of the Geologic Setback for the proposed development, with factors of safety (static and seismic) and the locations of the 1.5 (static) and 1.1 (seismic) factor of safety surfaces. Please note that our previous report (GSI, 2022a), provided a Geologic Setback Line (GSL), based on a Factor of Safety (FOS) line, where FOS$1.5, which was derived from reasonable regional setbacks for similar sites worked on by GSI. In contrast, the current GSL presented herein, is based on quantitative, site-specific data, used to calculate a FOS $ 1.5 line. Unless specifically superceded herein, the conclusions and recommendations contained in GSI (2022a) are still considered valid and applicable, and should be appropriately implemented during the balance of project planning, design, and construction.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of our services included reviews of site-specific and nearby geotechnical studies (Appendices A and B); 2) quantitative slope stability analyses (Appendix C); and 3) the preparation of this summary report and accompaniments.

Quantitative Slope Stability Analyses
GSI performed quantitative slope stability analyses along Cross Section X-X’ (see Plate 1), which used the topographic map provided in Soil Engineering Construction, Inc. ([SEC] 2019), as a base. The slope stability analysis depicts Cross Section X-X’, does not GeoSoils, Inc.
include bluff/shore protection structures, and Cross Section X-X’ is shown on Plates C-1 and C-2. This traverse was selected for the analyses as it represents the highest and steepest portion of the coastal bluff in closest proximity to the existing residential structure.

The analyses were conducted using the two-dimensional limit-equilibrium slope stability software program “GEOSTASE” version 4.30.31, developed by Gregory Geotechnical (2019). A general summary of the “GEOSTASE” program is included in Appendix C.

The geologic conditions within the property were added to Cross Section X-X’ to assist with theoretical bluff failure modeling (see Appendix C). From the top to the bottom of the coastal bluff profile, the geologic units considered in the analyses included an iron-oxide cemented pedogenic horizon (residual soil) developed upon the Quaternary old paralic deposits (Qop4), weakly cemented sand (Qop3), and a weak soil horizon (paleosol) developed upon relic dune deposits (Qop3) that overlie horizontally-bedded clean sand beach deposits (Qop1). Eocene-age sedimentary bedrock, belonging to the Torrey Sandstone, comprises the near-vertical seacliff along the bluff toe.

Shear strength properties applied to the geologic units, considered in the analyses, were based on our review of the 2021 geotechnical update study Soil Engineering Construction, Inc. (SEC) performed at the subject property and 235, 245, and 249 Pacific Avenue (SEC, 2021), and a 2004 geotechnical investigation of nearby 341, 347, and 355 Pacific Avenue, conducted by Shepardson Engineering Associates, Inc. ([SEA], 2004). We assigned anisotropic soil strength properties to the old paralic deposits. The earth material shear strengths and the anisotropic angular ranges are summarized in Appendix C.

We applied a groundwater surface at North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) to represent the estimated regional groundwater table (i.e., sea level). Owing to the modeled bluff failure mechanics, this groundwater surface is considered irrelevant with respect to the analyses.

Building loads imparted by the onsite residential structure and garage were modeled by applying a distributed load of 1,000 pounds per square foot (psf). For the pseudo-static (seismic) slope stability analyses, earthquake loading was replicated using a peak ground acceleration, adjusted for site effects (PGAM), of 0.669 g (www.seismicmaps.org), and a horizontal seismic coefficient of 0.15i.

Based on our review of oblique aerial photographs available on the “California Coastal Records Project” website (https://www.californiacoastline.org), and our past work experience along the Solana Beach coastline, the typical bluff failure mechanics that results in bluff edge retreat consists of rotational failures (slumps) occurring within the weakly cemented sand part of the old paralic deposits (Qop3). The slip surfaces of these failures commonly daylight the bluff face along the contact between the aforementioned sand and the underlying weak paleosol (Qop2). Block topple and wedge failures of the Torrey Sandstone (Tt) in the seacliff from marine erosion and the raveling of the overlying clean beach sands (Qop1) exacerbate the magnitude and frequency of these failures.

Following the failure of the weakly cemented sand part of the old paralic deposits, the Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A2-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 15, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a2.gaa Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc.
overlying iron-oxide cemented sand part along the crest of the coastal bluff (Qop4) lacks support and succumbs to block topple. Owing to the heterogeneity of the old paralic deposits, the failure geometry is considered non-circular.

Given the observed failure mechanics, we searched for non-circular theoretical failures surfaces initiating along the geologic contact between Qop2 and Qop3 and terminating at the ground surface within the developed portion of the property. The analyses showed that the theoretical failure surface with a static factor-of-safety (FOS) of 1.5 would daylight the ground surface along Cross Section X-X’ at approximately 32¾ feet landward of the coastal bluff edge. The analyses also demonstrated that the theoretical failure surface with a seismic factor-of-safety (FOS) of 1.3 would daylight the ground surface along Cross Section X-X’ at approximately 19½ feet landward of the coastal bluff edge.

Linear interpolation was used to estimate the location along Cross Section X-X’ where the theoretical failure surface having a seismic FOS equal to 1.1 would daylight the ground surface. The linear interpolation exercise assumed the seismic FOS would be 1.0 at the bluff edge location. Linear interpolation indicated that the theoretical failure surface having a seismic FOS of 1.1 would daylight the ground surface approximately 7 feet landward of the coastal bluff edge along Cross Section X-X’

GEOLOGIC SETBACK LINE
The City’s policy regarding the Geologic Setback Line (GSL), is as follows:

Policy 4.25: All new bluff property development shall be set back from the bluff edge a sufficient distance to ensure that it will not be in danger from erosion and that it will ensure stability for its projected 75-economic life. To determine the GSL, applications for bluff property development must include a geotechnical report, from a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or a certified Engineering Geologist, that establishes the Geologic Setback Line (GSL) for the proposed development. This setback line shall establish the location on the bluff top where stability can be reasonably assured for the economic life of the development. Such assurance will take the form of a quantitative slope analysis demonstrating a minimum factor of safety against sliding of 1.5 (static) or 1.2 (pseudostatic, k=0.15 or determined through analysis by the geotechnical engineer), using shear strength parameters derived from relatively undeformed samples collected at the site. In no case shall the setback be less than 40 feet from the bluff edge, and only if it can be demonstrated that the structure will remain stable, as defined above, at such a location for its 75-year economic life and has been sited safely without reliance on existing or future bluff retention devices, other than a caisson foundation.

However, CCC (2022) had an additional criteria of a seismic (pseudostatic) FOS $ 1.1. As indicated above, linear interpolation was used to estimate the location along Cross Section Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A2-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 15, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a2.gaa Page 3
GeoSoils, Inc.

X-X’ where the theoretical failure surface having a seismic FOS $1.1 would daylight the ground surface.

Based on the results of our quantitative slope stability analyses and our site-specific evaluation of coastal bluff retreat over the 75-year design life of the currently proposed remodel to the existing residential structure and the open lanai, previously provided in GSI (2022), it is the opinion of GSI that a Geologic Setback of 53 feet from the coastal bluff edge would provide sufficient mitigation against coastal bluff failure and retreat over the aforementioned design life without the need for shoreline protection measures. The recommended GSL is shown on Plate 1 (Revised Bluff Retreat Map ), which is adopted from the architectural site plan prepared by Martin Architecture (2021).

LIMITATIONS
Inasmuch as this report is based upon our visual inspection and reviews of regional geologic information, the conclusions and recommendations are considered professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty, either express or implied, is given. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others, or their inaction; or work performed when GSI is not requested to be onsite. Use of this report constitutes an agreement and consent by the user to all the limitations outlined above, notwithstanding any other agreements that may be in place.

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A2-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 15, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a2.gaa Page 4
GeoSoils, Inc.

The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Respectfully submitted,
GeoSoils, Inc.,
John P. Franklin Stephen J. Coover
Engineering Geologist, CEG 1340 Geotechnical Engineer, GE 2057 RBB/JPF/SJC/sh
Enclosure: Appendix A - References
Appendix B - SEA (2004) Direct Shear Test Results
Appendix C - Slope Stability Analyses
Revised Plate 1 - Revised Bluff Retreat Map
Distribution: (1) Addressee (via email)
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX A

REFERENCES
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX A

REFERENCES
California Coastal Commission, 2022, Re: Coastal Development Permit Application #6-22- 0551/Schrager, dated August 3.

City of Solana Beach, 2022, Re: DRP22-014 a development review permit (DRP) for a remodel and the addition of a covered patio at an existing two-story, single-family residence at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, dated July 1.

GeoSoils, Inc., 2022a, Limited geotechnical evaluation for proposed improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263-312-12-00, W.O. 8278-A-SC, dated July 19 (revised). _____, 2022b, Geotechnical Update and Response to Review Comments, Proposed Residential Remodel, 529 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Coastal Development Permit Application # 6-21-0758, W.O.

S7719.1-SC, dated March 11.
_____, 2021, Geotechnical Response to Review of ‘Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, 216 NeptuneAvenue, Encinitas, California,’ dated February 6, 2021, byGeoPacifica, W.O. 7557-A5-SC, dated April 13.
_____, 2019, PreliminaryGeotechnicalEvaluation,Proposed Residential Development, 216 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, San Diego County, California 92024, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 256-352-18-00, W.O. 7557-A-SC, dated August 16.

Martin Architecture, 2021, Site plan, Schrager Residence, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana [Beach], California, sheet C1.1, scale: c-inch = 1 foot, dated November 21.

Shepardson Engineering Associates, Inc., 2004, Geotechnical investigation, of sea bluff stability, 341, 347, and 355 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, S.E.A. project no.: 203197-01, dated March 4.

Soil Engineering Construction Inc., 2019, Updated geotechnical evaluation of coastal bluff, proposed seawall extensions 235, 241, 245, and 249 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, CA, dated October 7.

GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX B
SEA (2004) DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS
il
10,000
8,000 .... .. ....... .......... ......... .. . . ··················••-:-••·················· ········ ··································· Li..

U)
~ 6,000 ....... ..... ......................... .............. ....... .... . .... ..... .... .. U) U)
w
a::
fU)
a::
< w
J:

U)
4,000 .... .. .... ........ .. . .. ................... ..... ... .. ...... ... . "'!" 2,000 .. ................ .................. .. ............. .. .. .. .... . .. .. ...... ..... .... ....... ........ . . ... ············· .. ..... ... ....... . -
0------------------------------------------------! 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 Sample Location and Depth (feet):

Soil Type and Visual Description:

Sample Type/Sampling Method*:

USCS Group Symbol and Name:

Test Data
MOISTURE CONTENT(%)**
Initial Test:

Final Test:

TEST CONDITIONS:

NORMAL LOADS (psf):

STRAIN RATE (in/min):

Results

1.1 18.0
INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE (degrees)
Peak: 31
Ultimate: 32

NORMAL STRESS (PSF)
S-1@ 12.0
Yellow Brown Fine Sand
lnsitu / C

SP POORLY GRADED SAND
DRY DENSITY (pcf)**
Initial Test:
(C,D,S)
1000,2000,3000

0.0010
101
APPARENT COHESION (psf)
Peak:

Ultimate:
531
612
• See Explanation of Logs for sampler symbol definitions. •• Average of three test points.

Date: February, 2004 I Project No.:
~
___,.SHEPARDSON
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC.
~ Direct Shear Test
203197-01
Plate
85 st Geotechnical Consultants: Pacific Ave.- Mc Culley 0 Engineers-Geologists en
'------------------""----------------------....._ ____ o 10,000
8,000 .............. ....... ........... .......... ... ... .... ..... .... . ............ ·······.· ........... .. . ..... ··········;····················· u:-
(./J
~ 6,000 .............. .... ........ ....... ..... ... ........... ... .. .......................... ..... .. .. ................ .. ........ .. .. .. ....... .... ........ .. (.fJ (.fJ
w
0:::
1-
(.f)
0:::
~ 4,000 .. .... ..... ....... .. . .. ................ .. .. ....... .. . .... .... .. .............. .. .. ......................... .. ............... ... , .. ........ ... ...... .. :c
(.fJ
2,000 ... ... ...... .... .... ............. .. ... .. . ........ .... ............... ... .. .... .................. . - "'!"
....

Q...._ ______ - _____________________________ __.
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500
Sample Location and Depth (feet):

Soil Type and Visual Description:

Sample Type/Sampling Method*:
uses Group Symbol and Name:

Test Data
MOISTURE CONTENT(%)**
Initial Test: 0.6
Final Test: 17.0

NORMAL STRESS (PSF)
[email protected]
Yellow Brown Fine Sand
lnsitu / C

SP POORLY GRADED SAND
DRY DENSITY (pcf)**
Initial Test: 104
TEST CONDITIONS: (C,D,S)
NORMAL LOADS (psf): 1000,2000,3000
STRAIN RATE (in/min): 0.0010
Results
INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE (degrees)
Peak:

Ultimate:
24 27
APPARENT COHESION (psf)
Peak:

Ultimate:
936
466
• See Explanation of Logs for sampler symbol definitions. ** Average of three test points.

Date: February, 2004 I Project No.:
~
----SHEPARDSON
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC.
~ Direct Shear Test
203197-01
Plate
86 Geotechnical Consultants: Pacific Ave.- Mc Culley ...._ ________________ Engineers-Geologists ..._ ____________________ ...._ ___ iii o 10,000
··················•······················· :••····················'.- ····················· -
LL.
(f)
a.. 6,000 ..... ................ .. ................. .. ···················· ....... .. .. ...... . (f) (f)
UJ
0::
1-
(f)
0:: <t: 4,000 ... ..... ........... .. ......... .. .. ... ..... ···················· .. · .... ....... .. . UJ J:
(f)
2,000 ....... ........ ... ... ... ........ ..... .... ·······•············ ~;l~ NORMAL STRESS (PSF)
Sample Location and Depth (feet): S- 3@ 40.0
Soil Type and Visual Description:

Sample Type/Sampling Method*:
uses Group Symbol and Name:

Test Data
MOISTURE CONTENT(%)**
Initial Test: 0.7
Final Test: 17.4
TEST CONDITIONS:

NORMAL LOADS (psf):

STRAIN RATE (in/min):

Results
INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE {degrees)
Peak: 41
Ultimate: 34
Yellow Brown Fine Sand
lnsitu / C

SP POORLY GRADED SAND
DRY DENSITY (pcf)**
Initial Test: 102
(C,D,S)
1000,2000,3000

0.0010
APPARENT COHESION (psf)
Peak:

Ultimate:
19 118
• See Explanation of Logs for sampler symbol definitions. •• Average of three test points. ~
~SHEPARDSON
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC.

Geotechnical Consultants:

Engineers-Geologists
Date: February, 2004 Project No.:

Direct Shear Test
Pacific Ave.- Mc Culley
203197-01
Plate
B7 ....

Cf) ..._ ________________ ..._ ____________________ .__ __ __. Cl 10,000
8,000 .. . .. · ...... .... ...... .

G:'
Cl)
e:., 6,000 .... ...... ............... ................. ............. .. Cl) Cl)
w
a::

IC/)
a:: t5 4,000
:c
Cl)
. .. ..... :, ........ .
2,000 · · ........ · .. .. .... · ("'""' .. ... · .. · .. · · ·: · ..... · · .. · .. · ...... ,•, · .. · · .. · · · · · · .. · .. · .... · · · ....... .. · .... ;, · · .. · .... · · · · · · · .... ·: · · .. ......... · .... .. 0------,,-------------------------------........ ----...,,.......,! 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500

NORMAL STRESS (PSF)
Sample Location and Depth (feet):

Soil Type and Visual Description:

Sample Type/Sampling Method*:
uses Group Symbol and Name:

Test Data
MOISTURE CONTENT(%)**
Initial Test: 10.9
Final Test: 13.8
TEST CONDITIONS:

NORMAL LOADS (psf):

STRAIN RATE (in/min):

Results
INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE {degrees)
Peak: 68
Ultimate: 44
S-4@ 70.0
Yellow Brown Silty Sand
lnsitu / C

SP POORLY GRADED SAND
DRY DENSITY (pcf)**
Initial Test: 113
(C,D,S)
1000,2000,3000

0.0010
APPARENT COHESION (psf)
Peak:

Ultimate:
2295
368
* See Explanation of Logs for sampler symbol definitions. ** Average of three test points.

Date: February, 2004 Project No.:
~
~SHEPARDSON
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC.
~ Direct Shear Test
203197-01
Plate
88 Geotechnical Consultants: Pacific Ave.- Mc Culley
Engineers-Geologists ui
'------------------"'----------------------"---__ _.o
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX C

SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX C

SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
INTRODUCTION OF GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 COMPUTER PROGRAM
Introduction
GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 is a fully integrated two-dimensional limit equilibrium slope stability analysis program developed by Dr. Garry H. Gregory, Ph.D., P.E., D.GE, Principal Consultant with Gregory Geotechnical. The name GEOSTASE is an acronym for General Equilibrium Options for STability Analysis of Slopes and Embankments. It permits the user to develop the slope geometry interactively and perform slope analysis from within a single program.

GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 is capable of performing popular limit equilibrium analysis methods, such as the Simplified Bishop Method, Simplified Janbu Method, Spencer Method, Morgenstern-Price Method, Simplified Janbu Corrected Method, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Modified Swedish Method, and the Lowe and Karafiath Method.

Standard search options include circular, random, wedge, block, and composite surface options. The software also includes a non-circular refined search option, referred to as ZRSAUTO. “ZRS” is an acronym for Zone, Reduction, and Shifting. The program can be used to search for the most critical surface and the FOS may be determined for specific surfaces. GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 is programmed to handle:

1. Heterogenous soil systems

2. Mohr-Columb and anisotropic soil strength properties

3. Reinforcing and restraining elements (i.e., piers, tiebacks [anchors], soil nails, and applied forces)

4. Nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb strength envelope

5. Pore water pressures for effective stress analysis using:
a. Phreatic and piezometric surfaces
b. Pore-pressure ratios
c. Artesian pressure
d. Constant pore water pressure

6. Pseudo-static (seismic) earthquake loading

7. Distributed and line loads

8. Automatic generation and analysis of an unlimited number of circular, noncircular and block-shaped failure modes

9. Analysis of right- and left-facing slopes

10. Both SI and Imperial units
GeoSoils, Inc.

General Information
If the reviewer wishes to obtain more information concerning slope stability analysis, the following literature may be consulted initially:

1. The Stability of Slopes, by E.N. Bromhead, Surrey University Press, Chapman and Hall, N.Y., 411 pages, ISBN 412 01061 5, 1992.

2. Soil Strength and Slope Stability, by J.M. Duncan, S.G. Wright, and T.L. Brandon, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Second Edition, 317 pages, ISBN 978-1-118-65165-0, 2014.

3. Rock Slope Engineering, by E. Hoek and J.W. Bray, Inst. of Mining and Metallurgy, London, England, Third Edition, 358 pages, ISNB 0 900488 573, 1981.

4. Landslides: Analysis and Control, by R.L. Schuster and R.J. Krizek (editors), Special Report 176, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, 234 pages, ISBN 0 309 02804 3, 1978.

5. Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation, by A.K. Turner and R.J. Krizek (editors), Special Report 247, Transportation Research Board, National Research Board, 675 pages, ISBN 0 309 06208-X, 1996.

GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 Features
GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 contains the following features:

1. Allows user to calculate FOS for static stability and seismic stability evaluations.

2. Allows user to analyze stability situations with different failure modes.

3. Allows user to edit input for slope geometry and calculate corresponding FOS.

4. Allows user to readily review on-screen the input slope geometry.

5. Allows user to automatically generate and analyze defined numbers of circular, non-circular and block-shaped failure surfaces (i.e., bedding plane, slide plane, etc.).

Input Data
Input data includes the following items:

1. Unit weight, cohesion, and friction angle of earth materials and bedding/discontinuity planes.

Mr. Rick Schrager Appendix C
File:wp21\8200\8278a2.gaa Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc.

2. Slope geometry and distributed (building) loads.

3. The apparent dip of bedding and discontinuities can be modeled in an anisotropic angular range (i.e., from 0 to 90 degrees in into-slope and out-of-slope directions).

For the analyses, anisotropic strength properties were assigned to the old paralic deposits (Qop1 through Qop4) between an angular range of 5 degrees from the horizontal plane, oriented in both into-slope and out-of-slope directions. direction.

4. For the pseudo-static (seismic) analyses, earthquake loading was modeled using a seismic coefficient of 0.15i and a peak horizontal ground acceleration adjusted for site effects (PGAM) of 0.669 g (www.seismicmaps.org).

5. Soil parameters used in the slope stability analyses are provided Table C-1:

TABLE C-1 - SOIL STRENGTH PARAMETERS

SOIL MATERIALS

SOIL UNIT
WEIGHT (pcf)

STATIC SHEAR

STRENGTH PARAMETERS
Moist Saturated
C (psf) M (degrees)
Bedding
Cross Parallel Cross Parallel
Quaternary Old Paralic Deposits -
Iron-Oxide Cemented Pedogenic
Horizon
(Qop4)
120 N/A 600 500 34 32
Quaternary Old Paralic Deposits -
Weakly Cemented Sand
(Qop3)
120 N/A 370 275 34 32
Quaternary Old Paralic Deposits -
Weakly Developed Paleosol
(Qop2)
120 N/A 450 350 25 24
Quaternary Old Paralic Deposits -
Clean Beach Sand
(Qop1)
120 N/A 0 0 34 32
Torrey Sandstone
(Tt) 125 135 3500 35
N/A - Not applied
Mr. Rick Schrager Appendix C
File:wp21\8200\8278a2.gaa Page 3
GeoSoils, Inc.

Output Information
Output information includes:

1. All input data.

2. FOS for the 10 most critical surfaces.

3. High quality plots can be generated. The plots include the slope geometry, the critical surfaces and the FOS.

4. The analyses were configured to search for1,000 trial surfaces.

Results of Slope Stability Calculations
Table C-2 provides a summary of the results of our stability analyses along Cross Section X-X’. Computer printouts from the GEOSTASE program are also included as Plates C-1 and C-2.

TABLE C-2 - SUMMARY OF SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

CROSS SECTION

FACTOR-OF-SAFETY (FOS) ANALYSIS

METHOD COMMENTS

STATIC SEISMIC
X-X’ 1.5
(See Plate E-1)

1.3 (See Plate E-2) Spencer
Code-compliant static FOS of

1.5 at approximately 32¾ feet
landward of the coastal bluff
edge. Seismic FOS of 1.3 at
approximately 19½ feet
landward of the coastal bluff
edge. Based on linear
interpolation, code-compliant
seismic FOS of 1.1 occurs at
approximately 7 feet
landward of the coastal bluff
edge.

Mr. Rick Schrager Appendix C
File:wp21\8200\8278a2.gaa Page 4

I I I I I I
SCHRAGER / 8278-A2-SC

UPPER-BLUFF FAILURE - STATIC
GEOSOILS, INC. \X-X' Upper Bluff - Static.gsd
Spencer Method
PLATE C-1
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
-20
10 40
70 100
130
-20
10 40
70 100
130
GEOSTASE® by GREGORY GEOTECHNICAL SOFTWARE
GEOSTASE FS = 1.502
3 2 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 10
B 1
B 2
B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 B 12
B 13
B 14
B 15
B 16
B 17
B 18
B 19
B 20
B 21
B 22
B 23
B 24
B 25
B 26
1 1
DL 1 DL 2
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
-20
10 40
70 100
130
-20
10 40
70 100
130 No. FS
1 1.502
2 1.502
3 1.502
4 1.539
5 1.539
6 1.539
7 1.547
8 1.547
9 1.547
10 1.549
Soil Moist Wt Sat Wt c Phi ru Pconst Piez Surf Soil
No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) (ratio) (psf) No. Options
1 Qop4 120.0 0.0 600.0 34.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
2 Qop3 120.0 0.0 370.0 34.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
3 Qop2 120.0 0.0 450.0 25.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
4 Qop1 120.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
5 Tt 125.0 135.0 3500.0 35.0 0.000 0.0 1
GEOSTASE .

Slope Stability
Analvsis
□
□
□
■
□
-- - -- - - -- - -- - - -- . -- - - -- - -- - -- - - -- . -- - - -- - -- - - -- - - · - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- ·-- - -- - ,~ , GREGORY •

GEO TECHNICAL
SCHRAGER / 8278-A2-SC

UPPER-BLUFF FAILURE - SEISMIC
GEOSOILS, INC. \X-X' Upper Bluff - Seismic.gsd
Spencer Method
PLATE C-2
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
-20
10 40
70 100
130
-20
10 40
70 100
130
GEOSTASE® by GREGORY GEOTECHNICAL SOFTWARE
GEOSTASE FS = 1.384
kh = 0.15000
2 1 8 6 7 9 10 5 4 3
B 1
B 2
B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 B 12
B 13
B 14
B 15
B 16
B 17
B 18
B 19
B 20
B 21
B 22
B 23
B 24
B 25
B 26
1 1
DL 1 DL 2
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
-20
10 40
70 100
130
-20
10 40
70 100
130 No. FS
1 1.384
2 1.384
3 1.388
4 1.388
5 1.388
6 1.393
7 1.393
8 1.393
9 1.402
10 1.402
Soil Moist Wt Sat Wt c Phi ru Pconst Piez Surf Soil
No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) (ratio) (psf) No. Options
1 Qop4 120.0 0.0 600.0 34.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
2 Qop3 120.0 0.0 370.0 34.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
3 Qop2 120.0 0.0 450.0 25.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
4 Qop1 120.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
5 Tt 125.0 135.0 3500.0 35.0 0.000 0.0 1

GEOSTASE I
Slope Stability
Analysis
□
□
□
■
□
GREGORY •

GEO TECHNICAL
W.O. 8278-A2-SC DATE: 08/22 SCALE: 1" = 10'
Plate 1

REVISED

BLUFF RETREAT MAP

ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
This document or efile is not a part of the Construction Documents and should not be relied upon as being an
accurate depiction of design.
75 YEAR

BLUFF RETREAT
BLUFF EDGE F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT
(GSL)
STATIC
F.O.S.=1.5
40' SETBACK

FROM BLUFF TOP
0 GRAPHIC SCALE
10 5 10 20
1" = 10'
N

SEISMIC
F.O.S.=1.1
X
X'
EXISTING SINGLE FAMIL y RESIDENCE
1 STORY
BASE MAP FROM:

AIA
/ c;tl lr1;' SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA CA

SITE PLAN
Geotechnical C Geologic C Coastal C Environmental
5741 Palmer Way C Carlsbad, California 92010 C (760) 438-3155 C FAX (760) 931-0915 C www.geosoilsinc.com January 27, 2023 W.O. 8278-A4-SC
Mr. Rick Schrager
241 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California 92075
Subject: Second Response to GeotechnicalReview Comments (November 11, 2022), Schrager Residence Remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California 92075, APN 263-312-12-00
Dear Mr. Schrager:

In accordance with your request and authorization, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), is providing this second response to the geotechnical review (CTE, 2022A [see the Appendix]) of our previous reports for the site (GSI, 2022a, b, and c). The purpose of this response is to address the reviewer’s comment. The scope of our services has included a review of the referenced documents (see Appendix A), excavation and logging of an exploratory boring on the site using a limited access drill rig (Appendix B), laboratory testing of representative samples for shear strength (Appendix C), analysis of data, and preparation of this review response. Unless specifically superceded herein, the conclusions and recommendations in our prior reports for the site remain pertinent and applicable.

REVIEW RESPONSE
For convenience, the reviewer’s one (1) comment is repeated below, in italics, followed by GSI’s response.

Review Comment
Based on CTE’s review, the provided documentation generally supports CTE’s opinion that the soil parameters used by the applicant’s geotechnical consultant in performing slope stability analysis appear appropriate for the soil materials being modeled, and the applicant’s consultant further reduced these values for their analysis. CTE notes that none of the direct shear test results supplied by the applicant were collected at the site, as stipulated by LCP Policy 4.25.

Response No. 1
The shear tests are summarized below, and the test data is provided in Appendix C. The location of the limited access boring is shown on Plate 1, following the text of this response.

GeoSoils, Inc.

LABORATORY TESTING
General
Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples of the onsite earth materials in order to evaluate their physical characteristics. The test procedures used and results obtained are summarized below.

Classification
Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soils Classification System (Sowers and Sowers, 1979). The soil classifications are shown on the Boring Log in Appendix B.

Direct Shear Tests
Shear testing was performed on undisturbed samples from the site, in general accordance with ASTM test method D-3080. Test results are summarized in the following table, and provided in Appendix C:

LOCATION

PEAK RESIDUAL

COHESION
(psf)

INTERNAL

FRICTION
(degrees)

COHESION
(psf)

INTERNAL

FRICTION
(degrees)
B-1 @10'
undisturbed
694 38 579 32
B-1 @20'
undisturbed
627 37 550 33
Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A4-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach January 27, 2023
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a4.srt Page 2

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
GeoSoils, Inc.

The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Respectfully submitted,
GeoSoils, Inc.,
John P. Franklin Stephen J. Coover
Engineering Geologist, CEG 1340 Geotechnical Engineer, GE 2057 JPF/SJC/sh
Enclosure: Appendix A - Selected References
Appendix B - Boring Log
Appendix C - Laboratory Test Results
Plate 1 - Re-Revised Bluff Retreat Map
Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF via email)
Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A4-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach January 27, 2023
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a4.srt Page 3
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX A

SELECTED REFERENCES
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX A

SELECTED REFERENCES
California Coastal Commission, 2022, Re: Coastal Development Permit Application #6-22- 0551/Schrager, dated August 3.

City of Solana Beach, 2022, Re: DRP22-014 a development review permit (DRP) for a remodel and the addition of a covered patio at an existing two-story, single-family residence at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, dated July 1.

Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc., 2022a, Application submittal geotechnical review, 2
nd
review Schrager Residence remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California APN: 263-312-12-00, CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000, dated November 11.
_____, 2022b, Application submittal geotechnical review, Schrager Residence remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00, CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000, dated September 20.

GeoSoils, Inc., 2022a, Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (September 20, 2022), Schrager Residence Remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California 92075, APN 263-312-12-00. W.O. 8278-A3-SC, dated September 30. _____, 2022b, Geotechnical addendum and response to Coastal Commission review comments (August 3, 2022), proposed improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue,Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263- 312-12-00, Coastal Development Review Application #6-22-0551/Schrager,” W.O. 8278-A2-SC, revised August 15.
_____, 2022c, Limited geotechnical evaluation for proposed improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263-312-12-00, W.O. 8278-A-SC, dated July 19 (revised).

Martin Architecture, 2021, Site plan, Schrager Residence, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana [Beach], California, sheet C1.1, scale: c-inch = 1 foot, dated November 21.

GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX B

BORING LOG

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CONSISTENCY OR RELATIVE DENSITY Major Divisions Group
Symbols Typical Names CRITERIA
Coarse-Grained Soils
More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve
Gravels
50% or more of
coarse fraction
retained on No. 4 sieve
Clean
Gravels
GW Well-graded gravels and gravelsand mixtures, little or no fines Standard Penetration Test Penetration
Resistance N Relative
(blows/ft) Density
0 - 4 Very loose
4 - 10 Loose
10 - 30 Medium
30 - 50 Dense
> 50 Very dense
GP
Poorly graded gravels and
gravel-sand mixtures, little or no
fines
Gravel
with
GM Silty gravels gravel-sand-silt
mixtures
GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay
mixtures
Sands
more than 50% of
coarse fraction
passes No. 4 sieve
Clean
Sands
SW Well-graded sands and gravelly
sands, little or no fines
SP Poorly graded sands and
gravelly sands, little or no fines
Sands
with
Fines
SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures
SC Clayey sands, sand-clay
mixtures
Fine-Grained Soils
50% or more passes No. 200 sieve
Silts and Clays
Liquid limit
50% or less
ML
Inorganic silts, very fine sands,
rock flour, silty or clayey fine
sands
Standard Penetration Test
Unconfined
Penetration Compressive
Resistance N Strength
(blows/ft) Consistency (tons/ft2
)
<2 Very Soft <0.25
2 - 4 Soft 0.25 - .050
4 - 8 Medium 0.50 - 1.00
8 - 15 Stiff 1.00 - 2.00
15 - 30 Very Stiff 2.00 - 4.00
>30 Hard >4.00
CL
Inorganic clays of low to
medium plasticity, gravelly clays,
sandy clays, silty clays, lean
clays
OL Organic silts and organic silty
clays of low plasticity
Silts and Clays
Liquid limit
greater than 50%
MH
Inorganic silts, micaceous or
diatomaceous fine sands or silts,
elastic silts
CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity,
fat clays
OH Organic clays of medium to high
plasticity
Highly Organic Soils PT Peat, mucic, and other highly
organic soils
3" 3/4" #4 #10 #40 #200 U.S. Standard Sieve
Unified Soil
Classification Cobbles
Gravel Sand Silt or Clay
coarse fine coarse medium fine

MOISTURE CONDITIONS MATERIAL QUANTITY OTHER SYMBOLS
Dry Absence of moisture: dusty, dry to the touch trace 0 - 5 % C Core Sample Slightly Moist Below optimum moisture content for compaction few 5 - 10 % S SPT Sample Moist Near optimum moisture content little 10 - 25 % B Bulk Sample Very Moist Above optimum moisture content some 25 - 45 % – Groundwater Wet Visible free water; below water table Qp Pocket Penetrometer BASIC LOG FORMAT:

Group name, Group symbol, (grain size), color, moisture, consistency or relative density. Additional comments: odor, presence of roots, mica, gypsum, coarse grained particles, etc.

EXAMPLE:

Sand (SP), fine to medium grained, brown, moist, loose, trace silt, little fine gravel, few cobbles up to 4" in size, some hair roots and rootlets.

File:Mgr: c;\SoilClassif.wpd PLATE B-1

I I I I I I I I I
-
5 0
30 25
20 15
10 62
64 55
59 73
SM
SM
117.0
115.4
113.5
110.5
112.8

4.0 3.2

4.7 6.3

11.2 25.9

19.3 27.1

33.5 39.6
LANDSCAPING TOPSOIL:
@ 0', SILTY SAND, olive brown, damp, loose to medium dense.

VERY OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qvop10):

Backfilled 1-13-23.

No Seepage Encountered.

Caving Encountered at 17' and 20.5'.

Refusal Owing to Caving.

Total Depth = 25'
@ 20.5', Caving.
@ 20', As per 2.5', olive yellow/olive black, dry to damp. @ 17', Caving.
@ 15', As per 2.5', olive gray to olive black, dry.
@ 10', As per 2.5', olive brown/gray.
@ 7.5', As per 2.5', olive brown/olive black, damp.
@ 5', As per 2.5'.
silty sand.
@ 2.5', SANDSTONE, olive light brown, moist, dense; breaks down to GeoSoils, Inc. BORING LOG
PROJECT: 241 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA BEACH W.O. 8278-A-SC BORING B-1 SHEET 1 OF DATE EXCAVATED 1-13-23 LOGGED BY: TMP APPROX. ELEV.: 80.5'MSL SAMPLE METHOD: Cal Sampler 140 lb hammer @ 30-in drop tri-pod Standard Penetration Test Groundwater
Undisturbed, Ring Sample Seepage
GeoSoils, Inc.

PLATE Depth (ft.) Bulk
Sample Undisturbed Blows/Ft. USCS Symbol Dry Unit Wt. (pcf) Moisture (%) Saturation (%) Material Description 1 B-2
H~
,,i
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX C

LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Tested By: TR Checked By: TR
Client: Schrager
Project: 241 Pacific Drive
Source of Sample: B-1 Depth: 10.0
Sample Number: B-1
Proj. No.: 8278-A-SC Date Sampled:

Sample Type: Natural
Description: Brownish Gray Sand
Specific Gravity= 2.65
Remarks:

Plate
Sample No.

Water Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Void Ratio
Diameter, in.

Height, in.

Water Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Void Ratio
Diameter, in.

Height, in.

Normal Stress, psf
Primary Stress, psf
Strain, %
Residual Stress, psf
Strain, %
Strain rate, in./min. Initial At Test Shear Stress, psf 0 1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Strain, %
0 5 10 15 20
1 2
3 Residual Stress, psf Primary Stress, psf
0 2000
4000
6000
Normal Stress, psf
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
C, psf
f, deg
Tan(f)
Primary Residual
694
38 0.78
579
32 0.63
1 4.7
113.6

27.3 0.4564

2.38 1.00

16.8 114.0

98.9 0.4506

2.38 1.00
1000
1519

3.1 1240

7.8 0.005
2 4.7
111.9

26.0 0.4789

2.38 1.00

17.6 112.5

99.5 0.4700

2.38 0.99
2000
2181

3.7 1777

8.7 0.005
3 4.7
113.8

27.5 0.4533

2.38 1.00

16.3 115.3

99.3 0.4344

2.38 0.99
4000
3831

3.7 3098

9.8 0.005
W.O. 8278-A4-SC
Plate C-1
/ ,, V ., , ,,
I/ I.•
V ,,,._ .- ., , I 1 .... . ... I !/ ,!' I
)IC CD V 1.- ,. I ., ,.,, I 1 .... , I !/ 1~"'" V , 1., , -c;;, ,, ., ... V , ,.,, ,I ~ .,. .. / , r7 ,, .,, ,, ... V ..,,, V ,, •-~ ~ v+, ,,
~17 '9/ ,,
I ;--..

I "-
" ~
I
I/ ' I "'-
I/
ttz v +---
I
~®H·
Tested By: TR Checked By: TR
Client: Schrager
Project: 241 Pacific Drive
Source of Sample: B-1 Depth: 20.0
Sample Number: B-1
Proj. No.: 8278-A-SC Date Sampled:

Sample Type: Natural
Description: Brownish Gray Sand
Specific Gravity= 2.65
Remarks:

Plate
Sample No.

Water Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Void Ratio
Diameter, in.

Height, in.

Water Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Void Ratio
Diameter, in.

Height, in.

Normal Stress, psf
Primary Stress, psf
Strain, %
Residual Stress, psf
Strain, %
Strain rate, in./min. Initial At Test Shear Stress, psf 0 1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Strain, %
0 5 10 15 20
1 2
3 Residual Stress, psf Primary Stress, psf
0 2000
4000
6000
Normal Stress, psf
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
C, psf
f, deg
Tan(f)
Primary Residual
627
37 0.75
550
33 0.64
1 4.1
116.4

25.8 0.4214

2.38 1.00

15.5 117.3
100.0

0.4100

2.38 0.99
1000
1405

3.5 1256

9.6 0.005
2 4.1
117.3

26.5 0.4104

2.38 1.00

15.0 118.1

99.3 0.4005

2.38 0.99
2000
2053

3.1 1719

10.0 0.005
3 4.1
118.0

27.0 0.4025

2.38 1.00

14.3 119.8

99.2 0.3814

2.38 0.98
4000
3631

4.6 3161

10.7 0.005
W.O. 8278-A4-SC
Plate C-2
:, ,, ,, ,,"
V ,,,, / ,,,,, ,, ,,,,,, / ,, I , ,, I ,,., I ,, )IC C) V ,,,, I :, .,,,, I ,, I ,, / ,,,, , .,, ,. ,, ,, / 7
:, ,,,...!" ,,. ,, ,,
V ,, ,, .,,, ,, ,, ,,
/ ,, , ,, 4 I/
V I,-'
~'--:;; .,,,, ,, ,,, "'
v, ...

V ~
I "-
~
I r---
V
~®H·
W.O. 8278-A4-SC DATE: 01/23 SCALE: 1" = 10'
Plate 1

RE-REVISED

BLUFF RETREAT MAP

ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
This document or efile is not a part of the Construction Documents and should not be relied upon as being an
accurate depiction of design.
75 YEAR

BLUFF RETREAT
BLUFF EDGE F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT
(GSL)
STATIC
F.O.S.=1.5
40' SETBACK

FROM BLUFF TOP
0 GRAPHIC SCALE
10 5 10 20
1" = 10'
N

SEISMIC
F.O.S.=1.1

SEISMIC
F.O.S.=1.2
X
X'
B-1
TD=25'

GSI LEGEND
B-1
TD=25'
X X'
2 STORY
L_ ___ _
I
I
BASE MAP FROM:

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA CA
"' \\:t :? :::> C> __.I
-.;;t- co
s
1 STORY (BELOW) I GARAGE (BELOW) I

SITE PLAN

APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING

WITH TOTAL DEPTH IN FEET
--------I - APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION w
=>
:z
w
> <(
(.)
U::
0 <(
a..

I 15~
,
Geotechnical C Geologic C Coastal C Environmental
5741 Palmer Way C Carlsbad, California 92010 C (760) 438-3155 C FAX (760) 931-0915 C www.geosoilsinc.com February 20, 2023 W.O. 8278-A5-SC
Mr. Rick Schrager
241 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California 92075
Subject: Third Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (February 3, 2023), and Solana Beach Comments (February 14, 2023), Schrager Residence Remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California 92075, APN 263-312-12-00
Dear Mr. Schrager:

As discussed, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), is providing this third response to the geotechnical review (CTE, 2023 [see the Appendix]) of our previous reports for the site (GSI, 2023; 2022a, b, and c), and comments by the City (Solana Beach, 2023). The purpose of this response is to address the reviewer’s comment and respond to the City. The scope of our services has included a review of the referenced documents (see Appendix A), slope stability analyses (see Appendix B), analysis of data, and preparation of this review response. Unless specifically superceded herein, the conclusions and recommendations in our prior reports for the site remain pertinent and applicable.

REVIEW RESPONSE
For convenience, the reviewer’s one (1) comment is repeated below, followed by the City’s comment, both in italics, which is in turn followed by GSI’s response.

CTE Review Comment
CTE recommends that the slope stability analyses provided in “Geotechnical Addendum and Response to Coastal Commissions Review Comments (August 3, 2022)” (GSI, 2022) be performed again using the conservative parameters indicated by the provided direct shear test results (or more conservative) to confirm the minimum factors of safety reported in that document.

City Review Comment
According to LUP policy 4.25, the Applicant is required to accurately show on the property the location of the Geologic Setback Line (GSL). “This setback line shall establish the location on the bluff top where stability can be reasonably assured for the economic life of the development.” This assurance is demonstrated by providing “a quantitative slope GeoSoils, Inc.
analysis demonstrating a minimum factor of safety against sliding of 1.5 (static) or 1.2 (pseudostatic, k-0.15 or determined through analysis by the geotechnical engineer), using shear strength parameters derived from relatively undeformed samples collected at the site.”
The samples you provided have shown that the current GSL is not accurate. The line may actually be closer to the bluff edge. This will not change the proposed location of the addition, and therefore, I would assume showing the GSL line in the correction location closer to the bluff and further away from the proposed addition would actually increase the likelihood of approval from the CCC.

Unfortunately, if the slope stability analysis is not performed again using the new information, we will not be able to confirm that the project is in compliance with LUP Policy 4.25.

GSI Response
GSI performed the quantitative slope stability analyses along Cross Section X-X’ (see Plates 1a and 1b), taken from GSI (2022b), as a base, using the required shear strength parameters derived from relatively undeformed samples collected at the site. The slope stability analysis depicts Cross Section X-X’, does not include bluff/shore protection structures, and Cross Section X-X’ is shown on Plates B-1 and B-2. The analyses were conducted using the two-dimensional limit-equilibrium slope stability software program “GEOSTASE” version 4.30.31, developed by Gregory Geotechnical (2019). A general summary of the “GEOSTASE” program, our analysis and assumptions are included in GSI (2022b), and are not repeated herein.

The required analyses showed that the theoretical failure surface with a static factor-ofsafety (FOS) of 1.5 would daylight the ground surface along Cross Section X-X’ at approximately15 feet landward of the coastal bluff edge. Linear interpolation was used to estimate the location along Cross Section X-X’ where the theoretical failure surface having a FOS equal to 1.5 would daylight the ground surface. The linear interpolation exercise assumed the static FOS would be 1.0 at the bluff edge location. Linear interpolation was also used to estimate the location along Cross Section X-X’ where the theoretical failure surface having a seismic FOS equal to 1.1 and 1.2 would daylight the ground surface. The linear interpolation exercise assumed the seismic FOS would be 1.0 at the bluff edge location. Linear interpolation indicated that the theoretical failure surface having a seismic FOS of 1.1 and 1.2, would daylight the ground surface approximately 9.6 and 19.1 feet, respectively, landward of the coastal bluff edge along Cross Section X-X’. Plates 1a and 1b show the new Factors of Safety (FOS) distances from the bluff edge.

Utilizing the future retreat rates from GSI (2022c), the unprotected coastal bluff may experience approximately 20.3 feet of retreat over the 75-year design life of the proposed residential structure, with a future SLR of 6.68 feet (assuming the existing seawall is not there). Cumulatively, this amounts to the FOS 1.5 distance plus 75-years retreat = (15 +

20.3) ~35 feet from the bluff edge. Accordingly, the prescriptive City minimum 40 foot setback from the top of bluff/bluff edge should technically govern.

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A5-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 20, 2023
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a5.trt Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc.

Please note that the required analyses was mandated using “shear strength parameters derived from relatively undeformed samples collected at the site.” Thus, the City-required analyses are devoid of professional judgement, are not precautionary nor reasonable, are not the best available science, and are not recommended to be used. Furthermore, the California Coastal Commission (CCC) is on the record as recommending “a total setback from the bluff edge of at least 50 feet” be used on a nearby project on a similarly tall bluff with similar geologic conditions. It is intuitively obvious that CCC would not approve a 40-foot setback on this project, as that would set a precedent for future bluff studies, and may actually open the door for retroactive appeals and litigation.

In contrast, our previous slope stability analyses (GSI, 2022b), used professional judgement, the best available science, were precautionary and reasonably conservative, and satisfied the above discussed CCC 50-foot criteria. We point out that regarding GSI (2022b), the City reviewer (CTE, 2022a) stated that “the soil parameters used by the applicant’s geotechnical consultant in performing slope stability analysis appear appropriate for the soil materials being modeled, and the applicant’s consultant further reduced these values for their analysis”; and thus are precautionary and reasonable. A contrast of the old and new GSL is provided as Plate 1a. The previous analyses and setbacks, utilizing professional judgement, are still recommended, and are shown on Plate 1b.

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A5-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 20, 2023
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a5.trt Page 3
GeoSoils, Inc.

The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Respectfully submitted,
GeoSoils, Inc.,
John P. Franklin Stephen J. Coover
Engineering Geologist, CEG 1340 Geotechnical Engineer, GE 2057 JPF/SJC/sh
Enclosure: Appendix A - Selected References
Appendix B - Slope Stability Analyses
Plates 1a and 1b - Re-Revised Bluff Retreat Maps
Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF via email)
Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A5-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 20, 2023
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a5.trt Page 4
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX A

SELECTED REFERENCES
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX A

SELECTED REFERENCES
California Coastal Commission, 2022, Re: Coastal Development Permit Application #6-22- 0551/Schrager, dated August 3.

City of Solana Beach, 2023, email entitled “1.27.23 (DRP22-014) Response to 11.11.22 CTE's Comments: (4.25 LUP Policy),” authored by Ms. Corey Andrews, dated February 14.
_____, 2022, Re: DRP22-014 a development review permit (DRP) for a remodel and the addition of a covered patio at an existing two-story, single-family residence at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, dated July 1.

Construction Testing&Engineering, Inc., 2023, Application submittal geotechnical review, 3 rd
review, Schrager Residence remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California APN: 263-312-12-00, CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000, dated February 3.
_____, 2022a, Application submittal geotechnical review, 2 nd
review Schrager Residence
remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California APN: 263-312-12-00, CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000, dated November 11.
_____, 2022b, Application submittal geotechnical review, Schrager Residence remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00, CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000, dated September 20.

GeoSoils, Inc., 2023, Second Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (November 11, 2022), Schrager Residence Remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California 92075, APN 263-312-12-00, W.O. 8278-A4-SC, dated January 27. _____, 2022a, Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (September 20, 2022), Schrager Residence Remodel, 241 PacificAvenue, Solana Beach, California 92075, APN 263-312-12-00. W.O. 8278-A3-SC, dated September 30. _____, 2022b, Geotechnical addendum and response to Coastal Commission review comments (August 3, 2022),proposed improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263- 312-12-00, Coastal Development Review Application #6-22-0551/Schrager,” W.O. 8278-A2-SC, revised August 15.
_____, 2022c, Limited geotechnical evaluation for proposed improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263-312-12-00, W.O. 8278-A-SC, dated July 19 (revised).

Martin Architecture, 2021, Site plan, Schrager Residence, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana [Beach], California, sheet C1.1, scale: c-inch = 1 foot, dated November 21.

GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX B

SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX B

SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
INTRODUCTION OF GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 COMPUTER PROGRAM
Introduction
GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 is a fully integrated two-dimensional limit equilibrium slope stability analysis program developed by Dr. Garry H. Gregory, Ph.D., P.E., D.GE, Principal Consultant with Gregory Geotechnical. The name GEOSTASE is an acronym for General Equilibrium Options for STability Analysis of Slopes and Embankments. It permits the user to develop the slope geometry interactively and perform slope analysis from within a single program.

GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 is capable of performing popular limit equilibrium analysis methods, such as the Simplified Bishop Method, Simplified Janbu Method, Spencer Method, Morgenstern-Price Method, Simplified Janbu Corrected Method, UnitedStatesArmy Corps of Engineers (USACE) Modified Swedish Method, and the Lowe and Karafiath Method.

Standard search options include circular, random, wedge, block, and composite surface options. The software also includes a non-circular refined search option, referred to as ZRSAUTO. “ZRS” is an acronym for Zone, Reduction, and Shifting. The program can be used to search for the most critical surface and the FOS may be determined for specific surfaces. GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 is programmed to handle:

1. Heterogenous soil systems

2. Mohr-Columb and anisotropic soil strength properties

3. Reinforcing and restraining elements (i.e., piers, tiebacks [anchors], soil nails, and applied forces)

4. Nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb strength envelope

5. Pore water pressures for effective stress analysis using:
a. Phreatic and piezometric surfaces
b. Pore-pressure ratios
c. Artesian pressure
d. Constant pore water pressure

6. Pseudo-static (seismic) earthquake loading

7. Distributed and line loads

8. Automatic generation and analysis of an unlimited number of circular, noncircular and block-shaped failure modes

9. Analysis of right- and left-facing slopes

10. Both SI and Imperial units
GeoSoils, Inc.

General Information
If the reviewer wishes to obtain more information concerning slope stability analysis, the following literature may be consulted initially:

1. The Stability of Slopes, by E.N. Bromhead, Surrey University Press, Chapman and Hall, N.Y., 411 pages, ISBN 412 01061 5, 1992.

2. Soil Strength and Slope Stability, by J.M. Duncan, S.G. Wright, and T.L. Brandon, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Second Edition, 317 pages, ISBN 978-1-118-65165-0, 2014.

3. Rock Slope Engineering, by E. Hoek and J.W. Bray, Inst. of Mining and Metallurgy, London, England, Third Edition, 358 pages, ISNB 0 900488 573, 1981.

4. Landslides: Analysis and Control, by R.L. Schuster and R.J. Krizek (editors), Special Report 176, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, 234 pages, ISBN 0 309 02804 3, 1978.

5. Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation, by A.K. Turner and R.J. Krizek (editors), Special Report 247, Transportation Research Board, National Research Board, 675 pages, ISBN 0 309 06208-X, 1996.

GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 Features
GEOSTASE v.4.30.31 contains the following features:

1. Allows user to calculate FOS for static stability and seismic stability evaluations.

2. Allows user to analyze stability situations with different failure modes.

3. Allows user to edit input for slope geometry and calculate corresponding FOS.

4. Allows user to readily review on-screen the input slope geometry.

5. Allows user to automatically generate and analyze defined numbers of circular, non-circular and block-shaped failure surfaces (i.e., bedding plane, slide plane, etc.).

Input Data
Input data includes the following items:

1. Unit weight, cohesion, and friction angle of earth materials and bedding/discontinuity planes.

Mr. Rick Schrager Appendix B
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a5.trt Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc.

2. Slope geometry and distributed (building) loads.

3. The apparent dip of bedding and discontinuities can be modeled in an anisotropic angular range (i.e., from 0 to 90 degrees in into-slope and out-of-slope directions).

For the analyses, anisotropic strength properties were assigned to the old paralic deposits (Qop1 through Qop4) between an angular range of 5 degrees from the horizontal plane, oriented in both into-slope and out-of-slope directions. direction.

4. For the pseudo-static (seismic) analyses, earthquake loading was modeled using a seismic coefficient of 0.15i and a peak horizontal ground acceleration adjusted for site effects (PGAM) of 0.669 g (www.seismicmaps.org).

5. Soil parameters used in the slope stability analyses are provided Table B-1:

TABLE B-1 - SOIL STRENGTH PARAMETERS

SOIL MATERIALS

SOIL UNIT
WEIGHT (pcf)

STATIC SHEAR

STRENGTH PARAMETERS
Moist Saturated
C (psf) M (degrees)
Bedding
Cross Parallel Cross Parallel
Quaternary Old Paralic Deposits -
Iron-Oxide Cemented Pedogenic
Horizon
(Qop4)
120 N/A 694 579 38 32
Quaternary Old Paralic Deposits -
Weakly Cemented Sand
(Qop3)
120 N/A 627 550 37 33
Quaternary Old Paralic Deposits -
Weakly Developed Paleosol
(Qop2)
120 N/A 450 350 25 24
Quaternary Old Paralic Deposits -
Clean Beach Sand
(Qop1)
120 N/A 0 0 34 32
Torrey Sandstone
(Tt) 125 135 3500 35
N/A - Not applied
Mr. Rick Schrager Appendix B
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a5.trt Page 3
GeoSoils, Inc.

Output Information
Output information includes:

1. All input data.

2. FOS for the 10 most critical surfaces.

3. High quality plots can be generated. The plots include the slope geometry, the critical surfaces and the FOS.

4. The analyses were configured to search for1,000 trial surfaces.

Results of Slope Stability Calculations
Table C-2 provides a summary of the results of our stability analyses along Cross Section X-X’. Computer printouts from the GEOSTASE program are also included as Plates B-1 and B-2.

TABLE B-2 - SUMMARY OF SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
CROSS

SECTION

FACTOR-OF-SAFETY (FOS) ANALYSIS

METHOD COMMENTS

STATIC SEISMIC
X-X’ 1.5
(See Plate B-1)

1.3 (See Plate B-2) Spencer
Code-compliant static FOS of 1.5 at
approximately 32¾ feet landward of
the coastal bluff edge. Seismic FOS of

1.3 at approximately 19½ feet
landward of the coastal bluff edge.

Based on linear interpolation, codecompliant seismic FOS of 1.1 occurs at approximately 7 feet landward of the
coastal bluff edge.

Mr. Rick Schrager Appendix B
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a5.trt Page 4

I I I I I I
SCHRAGER / 8278-A5-SC

UPPER-BLUFF FAILURE - STATIC
GEOSOILS, INC. \X-X' Upper Bluff - Static.gsd
Spencer Method
PLATE B-1
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
-20
10 40
70 100
130
-20
10 40
70 100
130
GEOSTASE® by GREGORY GEOTECHNICAL SOFTWARE
GEOSTASE FS = 1.583
3 2 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 10
B 1
B 2
B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 B 12
B 13
B 14
B 15
B 16
B 17
B 18
B 19
B 20
B 21
B 22
B 23
B 24
B 25
B 26
1 1
DL 1 DL 2
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
-20
10 40
70 100
130
-20
10 40
70 100
130 No. FS
1 1.583
2 1.583
3 1.583
4 1.596
5 1.596
6 1.596
7 1.597
8 1.597
9 1.597
10 1.641
Soil Moist Wt Sat Wt c Phi ru Pconst Piez Surf Soil
No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) (ratio) (psf) No. Options
1 Qop4 120.0 0.0 694.0 38.0 0.150 0.0 0 A
2 Qop3 120.0 0.0 627.0 37.0 0.150 0.0 0 A
3 Qop2 120.0 0.0 450.0 25.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
4 Qop1 120.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
5 Tt 125.0 135.0 3500.0 35.0 0.000 0.0 1
GEOSTASE .

Slope Stability
Analvsis
□
□
□
■
□
-- - -- - - -- - -- - - -- . -- - - -- - -- - -- - - -- . -- - - -- - -- - - -- - - · - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- ·-- - -- - ,~ , GREGORY •

GEO TECHNICAL
SCHRAGER / 8278-A5-SC

UPPER-BLUFF FAILURE - SEISMIC
GEOSOILS, INC. \X-X' Upper Bluff - Seismic.gsd
Spencer Method
PLATE B-2
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
-20
10 40
70 100
130
-20
10 40
70 100
130
GEOSTASE® by GREGORY GEOTECHNICAL SOFTWARE
GEOSTASE FS = 1.273
kh = 0.15000
3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 9 10
B 1
B 2
B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 B 12
B 13
B 14
B 15
B 16
B 17
B 18
B 19
B 20
B 21
B 22
B 23
B 24
B 25
B 26
1 1
DL 1 DL 2
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
-20
10 40
70 100
130
-20
10 40
70 100
130 No. FS
1 1.273
2 1.273
3 1.273
4 1.281
5 1.281
6 1.281
7 1.308
8 1.308
9 1.313
10 1.313
Soil Moist Wt Sat Wt c Phi ru Pconst Piez Surf Soil
No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) (ratio) (psf) No. Options
1 Qop4 120.0 0.0 694.0 38.0 0.150 0.0 0 A
2 Qop3 120.0 0.0 627.0 37.0 0.150 0.0 0 A
3 Qop2 120.0 0.0 450.0 25.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
4 Qop1 120.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.000 0.0 0 A
5 Tt 125.0 135.0 3500.0 35.0 0.000 0.0 1
GEOSTASE .

Slope Stability
Analvsis
□
□
□
■
□
-- - -- - - -- - -- - - -- . -- - - -- - -- - -- - - -- . -- - - -- - -- - - -- - - · - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- ·-- - -- - ,~ , GREGORY •

GEO TECHNICAL
W.O. 8278-A5-SC DATE: 02/23 SCALE: 1" = 10'
Plate 1a

RE-REVISED

BLUFF RETREAT MAP

ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
This document or efile is not a part of the Construction Documents and should not be relied upon as being an
accurate depiction of design.

BLUFF EDGE

OLD GSL
(RECOMMENDED)
F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT
40' SETBACK

FROM BLUFF TOP
0 GRAPHIC SCALE
10 5 10 20
1" = 10'
N
X
X'
B-1
TD=25'

GSI LEGEND
B-1
TD=25'
X X'

NEW GSL (NOT

RECOMMENDED)
F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT

17.8'
2 STORY
L_ ___ _
I ~
I ~ co
IUJ
CJ)
UJ
0 163
.
:? \~ :::> C> __.I
-.;;t- co
BASE MAP FROM:

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA CA
102'
1 STORY (BELOW) I GARAGE (BELOW) I

SITE PLAN
----------------------------------,
s APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING

WITH TOTAL DEPTH IN FEET
....,.__..,., - APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION t------~----,------, W.O. 8278-A5-SC DATE: 02/23 SCALE: 1" = 10'
Plate 1b

RE-REVISED

BLUFF RETREAT MAP

ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
This document or efile is not a part of the Construction Documents and should not be relied upon as being an
accurate depiction of design.

BLUFF EDGE

RECOMMENDED
F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT
(GSL)
40' SETBACK

FROM BLUFF TOP
0 GRAPHIC SCALE
10 5 10 20
1" = 10'
N

PREVIOUS

SEISMIC
F.O.S.=1.1

PREVIOUS

SEISMIC
F.O.S.=1.2
X
X'
B-1
TD=25'

GSI LEGEND
B-1
TD=25'
X X'
75 YEAR

BLUFF RETREAT

RECOMMENDED
STATIC
F.O.S.=1.5
NEW

SEISMIC
F.O.S.=1.1
NEW

SEISMIC
F.O.S.=1.2

NOT RECOMMENDED
STATIC
F.O.S.=1.5
NOT

RECOMMENDED
F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT
ORY
BASE MAP FROM:

SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA CA
J
"' \\:t :? :::> C> __.I
-.;;t- co
1 STORY (BELOW) I GARAGE (BELOW) I
w
=>
:z
w
> <(
(.)
U::
0 <(
a..

I 15~
,

SITE PLAN
-------------------------------,
s APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING

WITH TOTAL DEPTH IN FEET
--------I - APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 1------~-----,---------.

Geotechnical C Geologic C Coastal C Environmental
5741 Palmer Way C Carlsbad, California 92010 C (760) 438-3155 C FAX (760) 931-0915 C www.geosoilsinc.com February 18, 2022
W.O. 8278-A-SC
Mr. Rick Schrager
241 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California 92075
Subject: Limited Geotechnical Evaluation For Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, San Diego County, California 92075, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 263-312-12-00
Dear Mr. Schrager:

In accordance with your request and authorization, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI), is providing this summary of our limited geotechnical evaluation of the impact of the proposed improvements to the single-family residence on the existing bluff, at the subject site. The purpose of this study was to provide a general, qualitative site evaluation for the proposed improvement, as it relates to the stability of the nearby coastal bluff. The scope of our services for this study included: 1) a review of in-house regional geologic maps and available literature (see the Appendix); 2) brief site reconnaissance and observations of the surficial site conditions; 3) review of the architectural plans ; and 4) the preparation of this summary letter and accompaniments.

SITE CONDITIONS
The subject property is located at 241 Pacific Avenue in Solana Beach, San Diego County, California. The site is situated upon a developed, steeply westerly sloping coastal terrace, adjacent to an approximately 75-foot high coastal bluff, along the Pacific Ocean shoreline.

The coastal bluff consists of a steep, west-facing, somewhat anthropogenically modified slope. According to a geotechnical report by Soil Engineering Construction Inc. (SEC, 2019), the natural bluff was inclined greater than 45 degrees from the horizontal and friable sand was exposed at elevations 25 to 35 feet (NAV88) which was contributing, to the destabilization of the bluff. The upper coastal bluff slope is sparsely vegetated due to rilling and sloughing of the bluff face and a recent slope failure and erosion. As a result of that failure, a 35-foot high seawall has been constructed, as recommended in SEC (2019).

From Google Earth Imagery (2020), the beach sand elevation, near the toe of the bluff, is approximately 10 feet above the approximate mean low tide elevation. In general, the top of slope is 85 feet (NAV88), the bottom is at about 10 ft. (NAV88), and the beach extends toward the ocean about 75 feet to the mean high tide line elevation of 4.41 (NAV88).

GeoSoils, Inc.

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
GSI understands that the proposed remodel consists of mostly interior improvements and some exterior improvements to the existing residence, as depicted in the architectural plans by Martin Architecture (MA, 2021). The improvements include: removal of the existing interior spiral staircase and replacing with conventional half turn staircase, remodeling the master bedroom area and closet, reducing the size of the Bedroom 3 on the main level and adding a powder room and pantry, removal of small portion of the roof, and construction of a new lanai adjacent the existing garage. Other than the lanai, no additional square footage is proposed. New foundations are proposed for the lanai, an exposed accessory structure, which is near the street (Pacific Avenue). Retrofitting of the existing foundation is planned at several locations, east of the 40-foot setback line.

GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
Regional Geology
The subject property lies within the coastal plains physiographic section of San Diego County. This section consists of dissected, mesa-like terraces that transition inland to rolling hills. San Diego County occurs within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of southern California. This province is characterized as elongated mountain ranges and valleys that trend northwesterly (Norris and Webb, 1990). The Peninsular Ranges extend from the base of the east-west aligned Santa Monica - San Gabriel Mountains, and continue south into Baja California. The mountain ranges within this province are underlain by basement rocks consisting of pre-Cretaceous metasedimentary rocks, Jurassic metavolcanic rocks, and Cretaceous plutonic (granitic) rocks.

In the Southern California region, deposition occurred during the Cretaceous Period and Cenozoic Era in the continental margin of a forearc basin. Sediments, derived from Cretaceous-age plutonic rocks and Jurassic-age volcanic rocks, were deposited during the Tertiary Period (Eocene-age) into the narrow, steep, coastal plain and continental margin of the basin. These rocks have been uplifted, eroded, and deeply incised. During early Pleistocene time, a broad coastal plain was developed from the deposition of marine terrace deposits (now termed “old paralic deposits”). During mid- to late-Pleistocene time, this plain was uplifted, eroded and incised. Alluvial deposits have since filled the lower valleys, and young marine sediments are currently being deposited/eroded within coastal and beach areas.

Site Geology
Regional geologic mapping by Kennedy and Tan (2007) indicates the site is mantled by Quaternary-age old paralic deposits. These deposits are shown as being unconformably underlain by sedimentary bedrock belonging to the Tertiary Torrey Sandstone. According to SEC, (2019) the Torrey Sandstone lies nearly flat at the site. Beach deposits consisting variably of unconsolidated sand to cobble exist from the toe of the bluff to the coastline.

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 18, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.lge Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc.

COASTAL BLUFF GEOMORPHOLOGY
Emery and Kuhn (1982) developed a global system of classification of coastal bluff profiles, and applied that system to the San Diego County coastline from San Onofre State Park to the southern tip of Point Loma. Emery and Kuhn (1982) designated the Solana Beach coastline as “active” and “Type C-c.” The letter “C” designates coastal bluffs having a resistant geologic formation along the base of the bluff and more erodible earth materials in the upper portions of the bluff. The relative effectiveness of marine erosion compared to subaerial erosion of the bluff produces a characteristic profile. The letter “-c” indicates that the long-term rate of marine erosion is approximately equal to that of subaerial erosion.

HISTORIC COASTAL-BLUFF RETREAT
Most of San Diego County’s coastline has experienced a measurable amount of erosion in the last 75 years, with more rapid erosion occurring during periods of heavy storm surf (Kuhn and Shepard, 1984). The entire base of the seacliff portion of coastal bluffs is based upon the available information, the use of a 6.4-foot rise in sea level over the design life of the proposed improvements to the property is fairly conservative (0.5% probability that SLR exceeds this amount [CCC, 2018]). Due to the relatively high elevation of the existing and proposed development (approximately ±76 to ±86 feet NAVD88), it is considered reasonably safe from coastal hazards including shoreline erosion, wave attack, wave overtopping and coastal flooding, even with a conservative sea level rise of 6.4 feet over the 75-year life of the development (0.5% probability that SLR exceeds this amount, per CCC [2018]), from 2019 to 2094 (year 2094 extrapolated from 2090 to 2100 data). The existing seawall below the subject site would provide additional protection from coastal hazards. exposed to direct wave attack along most of the coast. The waves erode the seacliff by impact on small joints/fractures and fissures in the otherwise essentially massive bedrock units, and by water-hammer effects. The upper bluffs, which often support little or no vegetation, are subject to wave spray and splash, sometimes causing saturation of the outer layer and subsequent sloughing of over-steepened slopes. Wind, rain, irrigation, and uncontrolled surface runoff contribute to the subaerial erosion of the upper coastal bluff, especially on the more exposed over-steepened portions of the friable sands. Where these processes are active, unraveling of cohesionless sands has occurred along portions of the upper bluffs. Finally, improvements sited near the bluff edge can concentrate surface runoff onto the bluff slope, and can contribute to subaerial erosion and bluff instability.

Numerous studies have been undertaken to analyze coastal bluff retreat along the Encinitas and Solana Beach shoreline. However, the most in-depth study to date, consists of a 1999 assessment by Benumof and Griggs (1999). This study presents erosion rates for coastal bluffs in different sections of the San Diego County coastline. The erosion rates published by these workers were obtained by analyzing a combination of factors including overall rock mass strengths obtained through Schimdt Hammer testing; visual Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 18, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.lge Page 3
GeoSoils, Inc.
assessments of joint spacing and width; earth material weathering and fatigue; groundwater seepage; and wave impact at the seacliff. These data were compared to the bluff edge locations observed in soft-copy photogrammetric images of the coast for the years 1932, 1949, 1952, 1956, and 1994 as well as more recent bluff edge locations surveyed with global positioning instruments.

For the Solana Beach coast section, which includes the subject site, Benumof and Griggs (1999) arrived at a mean recession rate of 8.23 cm/yr (3.24 in/yr), or approximately

0.27 ft/yr, with a standard deviation of 2.37 cm/yr (0.93 in/yr or 0.077 ft/yr). Benumof and Griggs (1999) also provided alongshore plots quantifying the amount of coastal erosion within their Solana Beach study area. Their findings indicated a site specific approximate retreat rate of 6 cm/yr (2.36 inches/yr) or approximately 0.1966 ft/yr for the subject site.

FUTURE BLUFF RETREAT SUMMARY
The calculated long-term rate of future bluff retreat using the simplified numerical model equation is presented below, based on the aforementioned three curvilinear sections and:

1. Historical rate based on the site specific review is 0.1966 feet/year = R1

2. Avg SLR rate over 91 years (1924 to 2015), based on NOAA (Scripps Pier, La Jolla1) is 2.13 mm/yr = 0.084 inch/yr x 1 ft/12 in = 0.007 ft/yr = S1

3. Future SLR rate (2097), under medium-high risk aversion scenario2 = 6.68 ft/75 yrs = 0.089 ft/yr=S2

4. m = a
GSI’s assignment of the value for the exponent “m” is reasonable based on the response of the onsite coastal bluff to increased rates of SLR would lie somewhere between the instant response (m =1) and no feedback (m=0) systems discussed in Ashton, et al. (2011), and is likely closer to zero.

GSI has reasonably assumed SLR will mimic the historical bluff retreat rate for the next 37 years (through 2059). We have used 0.1966 ft/yr for this time interval. The erosion rate should marginally increase for the following 25 years (2059-2084), and we have reasonably added a of the change in erosion rate in 2097, to the initial erosion rate (), see below).

During the more asymptotic Sea Level Rise (SLR) end of the 75-year design life (2084-2097), the bluff retreat rate should be closer to the site specific upper bound bluff retreat rate for this time interval. The site specific historic bluff erosion rate (assuming the existing seawall is not there), is indicated in the calculations below:
1NOAA, 2022 (La Jolla gauge no. 9410230)
2CCC, 2018 (Projected SLR [in feet]: La Jolla [extrapolated from 2090 to 2100, for 2097]) Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 18, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.lge Page 4
GeoSoils, Inc.

Site Specific Rate
At year 2097, under medium-high risk aversion scenario (0.5% Probability), R2 = R1 (S2/S1)
m
R2
= (0.1966 ft/yr) (0.089 ft/yr/[ 0.007 ft/yr ])a
R2 = (0.1966) (12.71)a
R2 = (0.1966) (2.33) =0.458 ft/yr in the year 2097.

Based on the above, the retreat rate will change from 0.1966 to 0.458ft/yr, and the difference between the 75-year commencement and end of the design life, )= 0.261 ft/yr, from 2022 to 2097.

FUTURE BLUFF RETREAT BASED ON SLR CURVE INCREMENTS

APPLICABLE DATES
BLUFF

RETREAT

RATE (FT/YR)

DURATION
(YEARS)
BLUFF

RETREAT
(FEET)
2022-2058 (0.1966) current SLR rate 0.1966 37 7.27
2059-2083 (0.1966 + a[)] = (0.1966 +a[0.261]= 0.283)
increase in SLR rate 0.283 25 7.08
2084-2097 (Calculated SLR rate in 2097 = 0.458) 0.458 13 5.95 Subtotal 75 20.30

SETBACK FROM BLUFF EDGE
Erosion over 75 years 20.30
Factor of Safety (FOS) = 1.5 distance from bluff edge 55.00 TOTAL OVERALL SETBACK FROM BLUFF EDGE 75.30
As shown above, the onsite coastal bluff may experience approximately 20 feet of retreat over the 75-year design life of the proposed residential structure, with a future SLR of

6.68 feet (and assuming the existing seawall is not there). Plate 1 shows a typical Factor of Safety (FOS) setback distance, where FOS=1.5, amounting to 55 feet, based on the approximately 20 feet of bluff retreat over 75 years, with an assumed SLR of approximately 6.68 feet over that design life interval.

FINDINGS
Based upon our understanding of the proposed development, our site observations, review of the available regional geologic information, and knowledge of the bluff conditions in the site vicinity, we provide the following findings:

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 18, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.lge Page 5
GeoSoils, Inc.
• With one exception, the proposed exterior improvements do not include the construction of new foundations, however, new foundations are proposed for the lanai, in the area that is both east of the 40-foot prescriptive bluff edge setback, and the cumulative FOS = 1.5 distance plus the 75 year erosion rate distance setback, near Pacific Avenue. However, we note that the lanai is considered an exposed accessory structure, which typically does not have a design life, and should generally not be subjected to such criteria.
• The proposed improvements would not subject the coastal bluff to significant additional building loads beyond the existing building loads, present onsite, prior to the remodel. Based on personal communication with the structural engineer at PattersonEngineering, Curtis Patterson, the estimated weight of exterior and interior materials replacing the old building materials or new construction is similar to or less than the pre-remodel material weight.

CONCLUSIONS
Based upon our findings and our understanding of the proposed development under purview of this study, GSI concludes that the coastal bluff below the subject property is susceptible to erosion from both marine and sub-areal processes. Given that the replacement building materials are of near to equal weight than the original building materials being replaced, it is our professional opinion that this remodel/development improvements will not further exacerbate bluff erosion or instability. As such, GSI will certify3 the following:
• The proposed remodel/development will neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area or in any way require the construction of protective devices that would substantially alter natural landforms along bluffs and cliffs.
• The proposed remodel/development does not restrict or reduce public access or beach use.
• The proposed remodel/development places no significant additional weight on the coastal bluff and has no adverse effect on the stability of the bluff. • The proposed remodel/development does not endanger life or property. 3 The term "certify" is used herein as defined in Division 3, Chapter 7, Article 3, § 6735.5. of the California Business and Professions Code (2021).

Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 18, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.lge Page 6
GeoSoils, Inc.
• The lower section of the bluff was recently improved with a seawall approximately 35 feet high and therefore, the lower bluff stability was increased substantially from pre-wall construction slope conditions.

PLAN REVIEW
The architectural plans by MA (2021) were reviewed and found to be general compliance with the standards of practice for construction within the City of Solana Beach, and are satisfactory from a geotechnical viewpoint.

LIMITATIONS
Inasmuch as this report is based upon our visual inspection and reviews of regional geologic information, the conclusions and recommendations are considered professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty, either express or implied, is given. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others, or their inaction; or work performed when GSI is not requested to be onsite. Use of this report constitutes an agreement and consent by the user to all the limitations outlined above, notwithstanding any other agreements that may be in place.

The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Respectfully submitted,
GeoSoils, Inc
John P. Franklin Stephen J. Coover
President, CEG 1340 Geotechnical Engineer, GE 2057
JPF/SJC/TMP/sh
Enclosure: Appendix - References
Plate 1 - Bluff Retreat Map
Distribution: (1) Addressee (via email)
Mr. Rick Schrager W.O. 8278-A-SC
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach February 18, 2022
File:e:\wp21\8200\8278a.lge Page 7
GeoSoils, Inc.

APPENDIX

REFERENCES
Adelman, Kenneth & Gabrielle, 2019, California Coastal Records Project, photos 10-23- 2004, 10-19-2006, 9-19-2008, and 9-29-2013.

California Coastal Commission, 2018, Sea level rise policy guidance, interpretive guidelines for addressing sea level rise in local coastal programs and coastal development permits, adopted November 7.

Eisenberg, L.T., 1985, Pleistocene faults and marine terraces, northern San Diego County, in Abbott, P.L., ed., On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in Northern San Diego County: San Diego Association of Geologists.

Emery, K.O., and Kuhn, G.G., 1982, Sea cliffs: their processes, profiles, and classification:

Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 93, no 7.

Google Earth Imagery, 2020, v.6.1.0.5001, copyright by Europa Technologies, aerial photo dated December.

Kennedy, M.P., and Tan, SS., 2007, Geologic map of the Oceanside 30' by 60' quadrangle, California, regional geologic map series, scale 1:100,000, California Geological Survey, Map No. 2.

Martin Architecture, 2021, Architectural plans, Schrager Residence, 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana, California, sheets C1.1, C1.2, EX 1.1, EX1.2, EX1.3, EX3.1, EX3.2, EX4.1, EX5.1, D1.1, D1.2, D1.3, D5.1, D6.1, A1.0, A1.1, A1.2, A1.3, A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A3.1, A3.2, A4.1, A4.2, A5.1, A6.1, A6.2, A8.1, S1.0, S1.1, S1.3, S2.0, S2.1, S2.2, S2.3, S2.4, S2.5, S3.00, S3.10, S3.20, S3.30, S4.0, S4.1, S4.2, M1.1, M1.2, E1.1, E1.2, E2.1, and E2.2, dated November 21.

N a t i o n a l O c e a n i c a n d At m o s p h e ri c Ad m i n i s tr a t i o n , 2 0 2 2 , https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends.html Norris, R.M. and Webb, R.W., 1990, Geology of California, second edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Soil Engineering Construction Inc., 2019, Updated geotechnical evaluation of coastal bluff, proposed seawall extensions 235, 241, 245, and 249 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, CA, dated October 7.

W.O. 8278-A-SC DATE: 05/22 SCALE: 1" = 10'
Revised Plate 1

BLUFF RETREAT MAP

ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
This document or efile is not a part of the Construction Documents and should not be relied upon as being an
accurate depiction of design.
75 YEAR

BLUFF RETREAT
BLUFF EDGE F.O.S.=1.5 +
75 YEAR BLUFF

RETREAT
(GSL)

TYPICAL
F.O.S.=1.5
40' SETBACK
FROM BLUFF TOP 0

GRAPHIC SCALE
10 5 10 20
1" = 10' N
c.,,
C>
~
p--1l
I : I
I
I I
I
□ I I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I.

I 7
I
I
r 25'-i' RYS.8tJ----,+--------+---
I
6 __ 1
EXIST. CONCRETE I

PATIO L
L_ __ _
I - / {
I I I .___ __ __J LU !\
c:o
I EX
ISTING SINGLE FAMIL y RESIDENCE
1 STORY
BASE MAP FROM:

AIA
/ c;tll lr1;' SCHRAGER RESIDENCE
241 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA CA

SITE PLAN
September 20, 2022 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000
City of Solana Beach
Attention: Ms. Corey Andrews
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, California 92075
Office: (858) 720-2434 Via Email: [email protected]
Subject: Application Submittal Geotechnical Review
Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
APN: 263-312-12-00
References: At End of Document
Ms. Andrews:

As requested, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has reviewed the provided submittal application documents referenced at the end of this letter. The purpose of our review was to assess whether the proposed project is in substantial compliance with the City of Solana Beach’s (City) Local Coastal Plan (LCP) policies.

The proposed construction includes interior and exterior renovations to the existing structure.

New and retrofitted foundations are proposed to the existing structure for support of the renovations. The applicant claims that the square footage of the existing structure these new and retrofitted footings will support will not increase. A new ancillary structure (a lanai, or outdoor covered patio) requiring four new shallow spread foundations is proposed adjacent to the existing garage. The lanai is proposed east of the applicant-claimed Geologic Setback Line (GSL), which consists of an approximately 20-foot setback for the estimated 75-year coastal retreat and an approximately 55-foot slope stability setback (client-claimed total GSL setback from bluff edge is approximately 75 feet).

CTE notes the following:
1) The slope stability analysis provided by the applicant (GSI, August 2022) used to determine the slope stability setback distance of 55 feet appears reasonable and conservative based on the parameters provided. Please note that LCP Policy 4.25 requires that shear strength parameters be derived from relatively undeformed samples collected at the site (emphasis added). The applicant provides multiple direct shear test laboratory results from another consultant (Shepardson Engineering Associates, Inc.) indicating they are from a McCulley residence located on a Pacific Avenue, however, it is unclear if the samples were collected from the subject site. Nevertheless, the soil parameters indicated A Universal
Engineering Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc.

Sciences
Company Inspection I Testing I Geotechnical I Environmental & Construction Engineering I Civil Engineering I Surveying 1441 Montiel Road, Suite 115 I Escondido, CA 92026 I Ph (760) 746-4955 I Fax (760) 746-9806 I www.cte-inc.net Application Submittal Geotechnical Review Page 2
Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00 September 20, 2022 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000
S:\Projects\4830 (GEO)\4830.2200073.0000 (Schrager Residence Remodel)\Ltr_Geotechnical Application Submittal 1st Review - Schrager 9-20-

22.doc
by the laboratory result sheets appear appropriate for the soil materials being modeled, and the applicant’s consultant further reduced these values for their analysis.

It is requested that the applicant provide the reports referenced for their soil shear strength values used in the slope stability analysis.
2) The applicant applies a FOS of 1.1 for their pseudo-static slope stability analysis based on California Coastal Commission (CCC) requirements. However, the City’s LCP Policy

4.25 indicates a pseudo-static FOS of 1.2 should be used.

It is requested that the applicant submit a revised slope stability analysis and Plate 1 showing the location of the Seismic FOS = 1.2 line.
3) Structural Plan Sheet S3.10 indicates a “GSL Setback Line 75 Year Bluff Retreat” that partially runs through the lanai and is well east of the total GSL indicated by the geotechnical consultant (GSI, August 2022). This discrepancy should be reconciled.

CTE’s review is based on the referenced and provided submittal documents. If the proposed improvements or referenced documents are revised or updated, or new documents are provided, they should be provided to CTE for additional review and comment, as warranted.

We appreciate this opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.

Colm J. Kenny, GE #3201
Senior Engineer
C.

Application Submittal Geotechnical Review Page 3
Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00 September 20, 2022 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000
S:\Projects\4830 (GEO)\4830.2200073.0000 (Schrager Residence Remodel)\Ltr_Geotechnical Application Submittal 1st Review - Schrager 9-20-

22.doc
REVIEWED DOCUMENTS:

Geotechnical Addendum and Response to Coastal Commissions Review Comments (August 3, 2022)
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California, APN: 263-312-12-00
Coastal Development Review Application #6-22-0551/Schrager GeoSoils, Inc. W.O.: 8278-A2-SC, Dated August 15, 2022
Response to Comments for DRP22-014 (241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach) Dated July, 20, 2022
Limited Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California 92075, APN: 263-312-12-00
GeoSoils, Inc. W.O: 8278-A-SC, Dated February 18, 2022, Revised July 19, 2022 Re-Submittal Plan Set
Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
Martin Architecture, Dated July 15, 2022
Limited Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California 92075, APN: 263-312-12-00
GeoSoils, Inc. W.O: 8278-A-SC, Dated February 18, 2022
Photo Survey, Sheet H1.1
Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
Martin Architecture, Dated November 21, 2021
Residential Building Record Sheet, Previous Approvals
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach
Dated July 20, 2022

November 11, 2022 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000
City of Solana Beach
Attention: Ms. Corey Andrews
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, California 92075
Office: (858) 720-2434 Via Email: [email protected]
Subject: Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 2nd Review Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
APN: 263-312-12-00
References: At End of Document
Ms. Andrews:

As requested, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has reviewed the provided submittal application documents referenced at the end of this letter. The purpose of our review was to assess whether the proposed project is in substantial compliance with the City of Solana Beach’s (City) Local Coastal Plan (LCP) policies. The reviewed documents include a response to CTE’s previous review comments (CTE, September 2022).

Based on CTE’s review, CTE’s comments (2) and (3) from the 1st submittal review have been adequately addressed. With regards to CTE’s comment (1), CTE has reviewed additional geotechnical documentation provided by the applicant, and specifically direct shear test data contained therein. Based on CTE’s review, the provided documentation generally supports CTE’s opinion that the soil parameters used by the applicant’s geotechnical consultant in performing slope stability analysis appear appropriate for the soil materials being modeled, and the applicant’s consultant further reduced these values for their analysis. CTE notes that none of the direct shear test results supplied by the applicant were collected at the site, as stipulated by LCP Policy 4.25.

CTE’s review is based on the referenced and provided submittal documents. If the proposed improvements or referenced documents are revised or updated, or new documents are provided, they should be provided to CTE for additional review and comment, as warranted.

A Universal
Engineering Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc.

Sciences
Company Inspection I Testing I Geotechnical I Environmental & Construction Engineering I Civil Engineering I Surveying 1441 Montiel Road, Suite 115 I Escondido, CA 92026 I Ph (760) 746-4955 I Fax (760) 746-9806 I www.cte-inc.net Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 2nd Review Page 2 Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00 November 11, 2022 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000
S:\Projects\4830 (GEO)\4830.2200073.0000 (Schrager Residence Remodel)\Ltr_Geotechnical Application Submittal 2nd Review - Schrager 11- 11-22.doc
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.

Colm J. Kenny, GE #3201
Senior Engineer
C.

Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 2nd Review Page 3 Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00 November 11, 2022 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000
S:\Projects\4830 (GEO)\4830.2200073.0000 (Schrager Residence Remodel)\Ltr_Geotechnical Application Submittal 2nd Review - Schrager 11- 11-22.doc
REVIEWED DOCUMENTS:

Response to Comments for DPR22-014 (241 Pacific Avenue) October 14, 2022
Application Submittal Geotechnical Review
Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
APN: 263-312-12-00
CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000, dated September 20, 2022 Geotechnical Addendum and Response to Coastal Commissions Review Comments (August 3, 2022)
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California, APN: 263-312-12-00
Coastal Development Review Application #6-22-0551/Schrager GeoSoils, Inc. W.O.: 8278-A2-SC, Dated August 15, 2022
Response to Comments for DRP22-014 (241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach) Dated July, 20, 2022
Limited Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California 92075, APN: 263-312-12-00
GeoSoils, Inc. W.O: 8278-A-SC, Dated February 18, 2022, Revised July 19, 2022 Re-Submittal Plan Set
Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
Martin Architecture, Dated July 15, 2022
Limited Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California 92075, APN: 263-312-12-00
GeoSoils, Inc. W.O: 8278-A-SC, Dated February 18, 2022
Photo Survey, Sheet H1.1
Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
Martin Architecture, Dated November 21, 2021
Residential Building Record Sheet, Previous Approvals
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach
Dated July 20, 2022
February 3, 2023 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073
City of Solana Beach
Attention: Ms. Corey Andrews
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, California 92075
Office: (858) 720-2434 Via Email: [email protected]
Subject: Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 3rd Review Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
APN: 263-312-12-00
References: At End of Document
Ms. Andrews:

As requested, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has reviewed the provided submittal application documents referenced at the end of this letter. The purpose of our review was to assess whether the information provided in “Second Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (November 11, 2022)” (GSI, 2023) satisfied outstanding comments provided to the applicant in “Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 2nd Review” (CTE, 2022). Based on CTE’s review, the provided direct shear test results, obtained from the applicant’s site, satisfy the outstanding comments.

CTE recommends that the slope stability analyses provided in “Geotechnical Addendum and Response to Coastal Commissions Review Comments (August 3, 2022)” (GSI, 2022) be performed again using the conservative parameters indicated by the provided direct shear test results (or more conservative) to confirm the minimum factors of safety reported in that document.

We appreciate this opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.

Colm J. Kenny, GE #3201
Senior Engineer
C.

A Universal
Engineering Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc.

Sciences
Company Inspection I Testing I Geotechnical I Environmental & Construction Engineering I Civil Engineering I Surveying 1441 Montiel Road, Suite 115 I Escondido, CM ~£u£o I r-11 \' ou1 1-+o--+955 I Fax (760) 746-9806 I www.cte-inc.net Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 3rd Review Page 2 Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00 February 3, 2023 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073
S:\Projects\4830 (GEO)\4830.2200073.0000 (Schrager Residence Remodel)\Ltr_Geotechnical Application Submittal 3rd Review - Schrager 2-3-

23.doc
REVIEWED DOCUMENTS:

Second Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (November 11, 2022) Schrager Residence Remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California 92075, APN 263-312-12-00
Prepared by GeoSoils, Inc., dated January 27, 2023
Response to Comments for DPR22-014 (241 Pacific Avenue) October 14, 2022
Application Submittal Geotechnical Review
Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
APN: 263-312-12-00
CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000, dated September 20, 2022 Geotechnical Addendum and Response to Coastal Commissions Review Comments (August 3, 2022)
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California, APN: 263-312-12-00
Coastal Development Review Application #6-22-0551/Schrager GeoSoils, Inc. W.O.: 8278-A2-SC, Dated August 15, 2022
Response to Comments for DRP22-014 (241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach) Dated July, 20, 2022
Limited Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California 92075, APN: 263-312-12-00
GeoSoils, Inc. W.O: 8278-A-SC, Dated February 18, 2022, Revised July 19, 2022 Re-Submittal Plan Set
Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
Martin Architecture, Dated July 15, 2022
Limited Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California 92075, APN: 263-312-12-00
GeoSoils, Inc. W.O: 8278-A-SC, Dated February 18, 2022
Photo Survey, Sheet H1.1
Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
Martin Architecture, Dated November 21, 2021
Residential Building Record Sheet, Previous Approvals
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach
Dated July 20, 2022
March 6, 2023 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073
City of Solana Beach
Attention: Ms. Corey Andrews
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, California 92075
Office: (858) 720-2434 Via Email: [email protected]
Subject: Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 3rd Review Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
APN: 263-312-12-00
References: At End of Document
Ms. Andrews:

As requested, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has reviewed the provided submittal application documents referenced at the end of this letter. The purpose of our review was to assess whether the information provided in “Third Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (February 3, 2023), and Solana Beach Comments (February 14, 2023)” (GSI, 2023) satisfied outstanding comments provided to the applicant in “Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 3rd Review” (CTE, 2023). Based on CTE’s review, the provided slope stability analysis satisfies the outstanding comments. This opinion assumes that the geotechnical consultant, who has heretofore been appropriately conservative in their geotechnical analysis, has appropriately defined anisotropic conditions and parameters in their analysis in substantial accordance with SP-117A. CTE further notes that the revised analysis results in a GSL for the static condition that is less conservative than the consultant’s previous analysis, however the consultant intends to apply the previous, more conservative GSL line based on static conditions that they originally presented (GSI, 2022). As such, CTE believes that the consultant’s previous and revised slope stability analyses are appropriate and conservative, and no further exceptions are noted.

We appreciate this opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.

Colm J. Kenny, GE #3201
Senior Engineer
C.

A Universal
Engineering Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc.

Sciences
Company Inspection I Testing I Geotechnical I Environmental & Construction Engineering I Civil Engineering I Surveying 1441 Montiel Road, Suite 115 I Escondido, CA 92026 I Ph (760) 746-4955 I Fax (760) 746-9806 I www.cte-inc.net Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 3rd Review Page 2 Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00 March 6, 2023 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073
S:\Projects\4830 (GEO)\4830.2200073.0000 (Schrager Residence Remodel)\Ltr_Geotechnical Application Submittal 4th Review - Schrager 3-6-

23.doc
REVIEWED DOCUMENTS:

Third Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (February 3, 2023, and Solana Beach Comments (February 14, 2023)
Schrager Residence Remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California 92075, APN 263-312-12-00
Prepared by GeoSoils, Inc., dated February 20, 2023
Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 3rd Review
Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
APN: 263-312-12-00
CTE Job No. 4830.2200073, dated February 3, 2023
Second Response to Geotechnical Review Comments (November 11, 2022) Schrager Residence Remodel, 241 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California 92075, APN 263-312-12-00
Prepared by GeoSoils, Inc., dated January 27, 2023
Response to Comments for DPR22-014 (241 Pacific Avenue) October 14, 2022
Application Submittal Geotechnical Review
Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
APN: 263-312-12-00
CTE Job No. 4830.2200073.0000, dated September 20, 2022 Geotechnical Addendum and Response to Coastal Commissions Review Comments (August 3, 2022)
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California, APN: 263-312-12-00
Coastal Development Review Application #6-22-0551/Schrager GeoSoils, Inc. W.O.: 8278-A2-SC, Dated August 15, 2022
Response to Comments for DRP22-014 (241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach) Dated July, 20, 2022
Limited Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California 92075, APN: 263-312-12-00
GeoSoils, Inc. W.O: 8278-A-SC, Dated February 18, 2022, Revised July 19, 2022 Application Submittal Geotechnical Review, 4th Review Page 3 Schrager Residence Remodel
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, APN: 263-312-12-00 March 6, 2023 CTE Job No. 4830.2200073
Re-Submittal Plan Set
Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
Martin Architecture, Dated July 15, 2022
Limited Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Improvements at 241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach San Diego County, California 92075, APN: 263-312-12-00
GeoSoils, Inc. W.O: 8278-A-SC, Dated February 18, 2022
Photo Survey, Sheet H1.1
Schrager Residence
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California
Martin Architecture, Dated November 21, 2021
Residential Building Record Sheet, Previous Approvals
241 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach
Dated July 20, 2022
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance
SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report
BACKGROUND:

California Government Code Section 53600 requires timely reporting of local agency investment transactions and portfolio to the agency’s legislative body.

This item is before City Council to receive a presentation and to accept and file the Cash and Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2022.

DISCUSSION:

The investment objectives for the City of Solana Beach are 1) to provide safety to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio, 2) to provide sufficient liquidity for cash needs and 3) to generate a market rate of return consistent with the Investment Policy.

The performance objective for the portfolio is to earn a total rate of return through a market cycle that is equal to or above the return on the benchmark yield. In order to achieve this objective, the portfolio invests in high-quality fixed income securities that comply with the Investment Policy and all applicable regulations governing the funds.

The attached Quarterly Cash and Investment Report ensures that the City complies with Section 53600. The City’s investment portfolio complies with the City’s Investment Policy that is approved annually by the City Council. The majority of City funds are invested in Chandler Asset Management (Chandler), Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS), and Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA
April 12, 2023
Quarterly Investment Report