Solana Beach City Council
September 27, 2023

approved plans. This shall be accomplished by the
Engineer of Record incorporating as-built conditions on the Mylar grading plans and obtaining signatures of the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer certifying
the as-built conditions.
j. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan
shall be prepared by the Applicant. Best management
practices shall be developed and implemented to
manage storm water and non-storm water discharges
from the site at all times during excavation and grading activities. Erosion prevention shall be emphasized as
the most important measure for keeping sediment on
site during excavation and grading activities. Sediment controls shall be used as a supplement to erosion
prevention for keeping sediment on site.
k. The Applicant shall show all proposed on-site private drainage facilities intended to discharge water run-off.

Elements of this design shall include a hydrologic and
hydraulic analysis verifying the adequacy of the
facilities and identify any easements or structures
required to properly convey the drainage. The
construction of drainage structures shall comply with
the standards set forth by the San Diego Regional
Standard Drawings.
l. Post Construction Best Management Practices
meeting City and RWQCB Order No. R9-2013-001
requirements shall be implemented in the drainage
design.
m. No increased cross lot drainage shall be allowed.
n. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a building pad certification statement from a
soils engineer and an engineer or land surveyor
licensed in Land Surveying per SBMC 15.40.230E. If a
demo permit is required for removing existing
structures before grading, the Applicant shall obtain the demo permit separately in order to certify the grading
prior to issuance of the Building Permit.

V. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the abovementioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

Resolution 2023-064
DRP22-013/SDP22-011
Bowers – 228 N Helix Ave

VI. EXPIRATION
The Development Review Permit and Structure Development Permit for the project will expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicant has obtained building permits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council according to SBMC 17.72.110.

VII. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.

In the event of such election, the Applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter.

However, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicant.

NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 27th day of September, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
Resolution 2023-064
DRP22-013/SDP22-011
Bowers – 228 N Helix Ave

______________________________

LESA HEEBNER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk ABBREVIATIONS:

AE
AC
A.G.
t.,[)J
AF=
l.J ... UM
,;ppt
AF:;:)X
'.jJ
BC:
.A:,2H0i\30U
.AIR CJNOITICNfR
KOUST::-.
k<i.ADf.A.,\i

ADJUSTABLE
J.:C.:J\1£F\SHFl::JR
ALUl/"\JllM
M'PLl'.:::ABl':

H~ROX'.'Aif
AT
9'C)~i)
E-J)lNC
BI..OC<
L::)-OCi\::C
&....,~D"lGiN>::r..

Bffi'HN
CAST ?ON
~iRC~ JQ.i\r
C::\IIER ~ '~f
CBU/\S
[A\.£TE<
Gv-V/1.~
00-l,",/S?OU]
[.',>'.,\'/.N:'.;
fACP
fXlEk.JQ •~&.\.A.TIC\ &
,:\'SHS-rs·cM
fX?A',SK)N J:JtNT
';;'._~Aiic•:

EQ ECJAl
CW EACr'V/AY
i:XISTlt'i t)QStr~:-:
fX"
A.or-.:·,ORA:"
r::: EXf,•,'ct.,iS<-·::-
t.~.;:rtGuv.,
F!NfS-·GRAC::

I H'iT :c,'tl/l
f-,. -EO• I.JD
FQO:,~:;ET
P""-:)i;'i('.'
L.,CQ( .:JN
ARE D:ilNG'. 5·1ER
~~\3!-<G-,......of:

FIREr-Y:JiW',..

F ', 3H
t'LOCi
FACi:. '.)f:STl;:,
r .)T/H
FQO'.\iG
r-1','JGE
(_,_.'...Of:

GALVA'>lEC, S'.)N
1 ,\SS
G-.. .,E ~A:~, 3EA!",;,
GVli.,'\'!BCA<0
'Al
MT;)
i>I
\;JA
N!C
·!o !!
\ T.S
oc
CN
oz
P,
:: o.c
PR
PQO?
PT
M
ts
'!iirn
HE"!G~;
f.,YJ.OWVB"AL
HOf;Z'.)NIA_
HQt;,;
lt,3UlA11CN
INTE'<QR
1'/Af,~=Actl <:'.:R
M-N;i/.Jll
Vl'.'!JIE
N~W
NOT;,;)Pi_!{:f.2_t
l\:>JT IN C'.)NTl?ACT
N,J~/13'.:R
NOI"JSCA..:

C\J CfNT:R
(YJf-:

OU!\.CE
LATE
PRCY:RlYU'.::

P.ASJIC
f> .. Y\VOO':.i
f"Oi<',· ::.)F C: •~NFC 8N
R~G::UIREC
ROC'.'
s·om-.tCAJN
ScC"'.>N
S\GLE C,\
SPf('':"·CAii'"'':
$Qt;.,;,_;_£
SAr-.JfiAfi\ S€Wei, iNE
iC>F ._,,-FAV,;,,;
u,s1e,.

VAf BN-i', _ (
Ve:(~ !N Fl~~.--,
VE1'.: ·-1:tc<t _ 1r.c ..
v,m--=,Ji
Wk:~.;::.Oi
w.:ioo
:, H WAI• r'!:A'·
\'Ii V,'1Wl.:;.;.; .. 1fiUN
wwr: \'.';)\IE"N\',.REFA:.:J1C

NORTH HELIX RESIDENCE
PRO...JECT INDEX
ARCHliECTURAL
CS l .C COVCR SHEET
Dl Df:MOLHiON Ft.AN
SP1 S~PW!
ALO BASEMENT FLOOR PW;
Al.l F!RST FLOOR PLAN
AL'2 SECOND FLOOR P\AN
A2.0 F A.R. O!A.GRA~l
A3,0 ROOF P-t..AN
A4,0 B'J!LDll\'G EA1ER!OR EtEVAT!ONS
A4.1 6U1LD!NG EXTEfilOR ELEVATIONS
A5,0 BU!LDlNG SECTIONS
A51 BU1LDlNG SECTIONS
A6.0 STORY POLES P\AN
A61 SfORV POLES ElEVA1lONS
A6,2 STORY POLES ElEVATIONS
CIVIL
co PKEU~l!i!..AAY GRAD!~ P!.N11
Cl B~;~p Sflt- PLAN EXIBIT
C2 DcfENTlON VAUiJ
i.ANOSCAPE
t 1 CONCEPT Pi.Af<-1
22B N HELIX AVENUE
SOLANA BEACH, CA 82075
PRO...JECT DIRECTORY
QYillEll

RYAN BOWERS
228 HELIX AVENUE
SOl.AflA BEACH. CA 92075
R80WERS'.Q}REDGAASSVENTURES.COM
{858) 395-7303 ?HONE
~
EOS A.~HHECTURE lNC.

CONTACT: JENN!FER 80LVN
7542 ~AY AVE.

LA JOLLA, CA 92037
{858) 459-0575 Pl+:JNE
SJ2\!J';X
COFFEY ENGINEER:'JG, lf!C,
9666 BUS!NESSPARK AVE ;;210,
SA!, DIEGO, CA 92131
{858! 531-0i 11 PHONE
I A'JOSCAPf ARCHlJFCT CARSON OOUGLA3 LANDSCAPE ARCH!TECTURE CONTAC': MICHAEL DOUGLPS BRENNAN
4407 ORCHARD AVcNUE SAN OiEGO, CA 92107
MICHAEL@CD-LA,COM
{619} 995-1306 Pr'ONE
Qlll.

PASCO LAili'! SJITER& ASSOCtt\TES
CON: ACT: J"50N SANTOS
119 ABERDEEN DRIVE, cNCIN!TAS. CA 92007
JSANi:.JS@P~SAEN3!NEER;NG.COM
(858) 259-8212 ?HONE
PRO...JECT INFORMATION
SCOPE OF WORK; NEW SINGLE FAM!l Y RESIDENCE. TWO STORY OVER BASEMENT.

ATTACHED TWO CAR GARAGE, ASSOCtt\TED NEW LANDSCAPE,
HARDSCAPE. AND RETAJNING WALLS
LEG.Al: LOT 16. BLOCK 21. SOLANA BEACH, MAP 1749, IN '.HE CITYOF SOl.AflA BEACH, COUNlY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

FILED IN lHE OFFICE OF lHE COUNlY RECORDER MAYS, 1923,
APN#: 263-321-21-00
EXISTING/PROPOSED USE; RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: MRd
OVERLAY ZONE: SCALED RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONE (SROZ)
SPRINKLERED: YES, PER CFC SECTKlN 903,2, 1, 1
INSTALED PER NFPA 13D.

PROPOSED GRADING: PER CIVIL DRAWINGS
GROSS LOT SIZE: 4,491 SF
MAX FLOOR AREA RATIO: FIRST 6,000 SF • 50%
50% X 4,491 2.245,SSF
PROPOSED FAR: 1,962 SF
HEIGHT LIMIT: 25'-0'
NOTE
OWNER TO l~'CLUDE SOLAll PANELS IN PROJECT

STRUCTURE HEIGHT
STRUCTURE HEIGHT LIMIT 25'-0'
EXISTING STRUCTURE HEIGHT 12,08 FT {75, l 7 AMSLI
PROPOSED MAXIMUM smuc1u~E HE!GHT 22. 90 FT [83.50 AMSL) VICINllY MAP
,_,, __ ,,,, _____________ --J- __ ,_,_, _________ - -"

SYMBOL LEGEND I GOVERNING CODE
!i:-.-1
,,..--lf ~.'.'Oit~rr:1
"'-S
,--
( 1 \~(Y·- tAAf''-
---,~~)~ 1>(£t!l,•.•1!!~
~-;
i ;~;~ ~ ~~~~~~~g :o CCDE
:::022 ,:..--:A. GR~i:N BU "DING ,:ooE
12 ?2 CA ELECTRICAL CODE
1022 CA MECHAl"C'Al Cr'DE I 2022 CA P.UMBll JG coo.
228 N HEliX AVENUE
1 BUILDING AREA
~~
BASE'~ENT LWABlE

FIRSTFLOOR LIVABLE
SECOND FLOOR ABlE
COVERED AND ,NCLCSED EXlERlrn AREA
5".illl6Gl:

Sl.!fil.QJ&
B.ASEMEt-<T EXHiPTIOf J
~EM!c!!P.N
IQTAt PROPOSCO FLOOR AREA TOTAL AllO'NABLE AREA
PlOOPOSED FAR BELO\'/ ALLOWABl,
TOTA!. PRC>POSED DECK AREA

1.612 SF
1 143 SF
72< SF
40 S'
~
~
-1,612S'
- 400 SF
i.£Q?,_,St
2,245.5 SJ:
283,5 s,
116 si::

I
~

ETBACKS

IRSTFLOOR
F:'.'iONTYMD

REQ'JIRED
20-C
'"OPOSED
2J-O-
~ I SiDE YAfd) (NI

SIDEYARD(S)

REAR YARD
S~CONC FLOC:?
5'-0
5'-0'
15'-C
FRONT YARD 20-0-
Sl'.JE YARD (NI 5'-C'
Sli)E YAAi) {SJ 5'-0"
llfAR YARD '5' -O·
t--"GRADING
s-c·
5' -0 7/8'
20' • 6 5:•8'
33' • 8 3/8
s·-W"./2
5 -10 1/4~
20 • 6 518"
I ~QULl!IlO.N EllQf'D.illt_CQMD!Timl
, lf\'.~ERVlOUS 1, t 3c; SF 11'';,RVICYJS J.93l '"
Pt:Rv'OUS 3,352 SF Pt:KV!'.JUS i ,55 7 SF
SI', GR/-Dlf\'G ('JUISIGS OF s:;iuc:. ,E)
SITE GRADING {BEtOW SlRUC1UREI
lv~,'.,X CU' llc::·
MAX FILL _l..0.f.!
EXCAVAit FOR r0011ivGS
REMOVAL - Rl'COMPACl
TOTAL G-RAO!N.; • CUI FILL, OUTS!~~;;:
lb CY
288CY
4S~ CY
u~•10sc:.PE:
r
1 1 t\!QN-LAhlDSCk't:. AREA
NON-IRrnGAlED \PJiDSCAFE
!R\iGATEJ LA.N::sCAF:::

VIATER FEATURES
Q'CQilf'CIVfJ:f',?12,s;,"<
TOTAL LOT A!(EA

IRRIGATED L'-NDSCAPE
W.'..,TER F::ATURES
~.J&iD_;,_Cm
ACREGI- ~t LANJSCAF:- AAE,:,
:EXt,sn~ ... ~
l lJ9 St:
2,720Sf
C SF
59:SF
AR&, 0' \',OR~
1,926Sf
SF
':'..l
EJI.L..
f'OQE,,;S"Q
2,350 Sf
0SF
nb s;
98 SF
".JLS=

4.491 SF
I
1 eos 1
I orchitecture Inc. I
..JENNIFER
BOLYN
A Ct'
REViSIONS
'05-0.C-2022
1 1 ST suaMTTAL
106-30-2G22
1 2ND SUBMITTAL
'08-25-2022
3RD SuBMl7'Al
110-19-2022
4TH S!JSMll,AL
I a 1-rn-2023
51H s·_;aMlTTAL
iOS-20-2023
!VACR=ViEW
I 06- s-2023
• CllY COUNCIL
I
I
I
I
I
I 1~~2
:~~~;Al _j J8-ae-202o "'
I 7T>-i SUBMJTTAL
09-12-2023
iC!iYCOUNCIL
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I \EP
1 !
_J_ r
•
c3 I
I
I
I
,, LI------",, ____ ~ ! ---------~j-_ ~ - ,. ·- •- ,_ - T ►•-
i
1jr ,._Hl\ll
~----s---s-___ --__ -s ~--.-2-----:=-.2_--::=-s---s---s---s-----s---s---s---s-- _ __ _ __ _ __ --s---- _ __ s-----s---s---s _ __ __

NORTH HELIXAVENLIE
~
_l:::D:'.--=E=.:M~O:::'..'::::L~IT_._I O~N~P_i:LA~~N:'.__ ___________________________________ _ 1/8' l'-0'

KEYNOTES
02 !EJPAlriWII.YTCll.E-!tHNVED
DS [C1WA1ERHcAfER1ClRER'cl-'OlE0
06 {EJR'~::.,cmG •iA'..1.TO'CVM-l

0.7 OUflT\C OF (E, '7-;,U)ft:':C SIRl..f''.'.-,}l<EJO ~= r.l:tl.C:'Ct.ro, !:C CMt ~.-1 ~~ .. ::; 1!-,'1':"'7'J,AIK":'.

D.B !EJFmliYDl<ANTTOeE:RElO:::AIED
D 12 :~)WATER t1"TER
I
1eos
- orch,tecture inc.
7542 FAY AVENUE LA JOclA CA 92037
PH: 858,459.0575 Bh)JL•~.o:m
.JENNIFER
SOLYN
RE\<1S10NS
os-o4-2□22
i 1 ST SUBMITTAL
06-30-2022
i 2ND SUBMITTAL
i 06-05-2023
!CITYC<;"J'JNC:!~
!07-28-2023
6 ce1 SUB'-,1ITTAL
, 08-23-2023
_j_71l-1_1l)BI~' _
!09-12-2023 '1
j CITY COUNCIL

PLANNIMS SET
07-27-2023
JOB NO.
21-19
01 2J4NHUST
r-PN. 263-321"2:,.oo
SITE PLAN 1/8" = l'·O•
217 N Sl£RRAAVE
M'N: 26J-.32' -2,UXl
B
211 ~. SERRA I-VE
AOf-J. 263-321-25-00
P2'1eB - .. T I .... ""''~"''°' ...... ......... . ..... ~ ........ ~ IT~ .. ... ~ ... ·······.·-=-i .• -.-... • .•.• :····• ..·•. ~.::.-. -.. • •.•. -.·.·.-. -... •.-.:·.•.:·.-.. -. .:.~,,. .. J ..•. -...••• :: .•.. =-.·.=t·····-.· .·i······::-·.· -.• •• .. 7 ..• .-.•·.· .. -..... ;.t .. ji.:
1-, • >-r==== - <i1...: - • ~-- _,L ~! ·4~
1 J__ _ __
1 ___ -I_ ------~~- . r.~
r
/~~11 ·=•·· • r r--J -~i
~1>·u / • r=========;=:-;~------~..J._=.__J ;.,, __ , .. 1 i • .-------'--- ~ ·h ~ I~ _;:i-c
!
I
I

11.,'1§]
.'/.

I": ,,,, c., ,,,,, .. ,,· ••=~·. I ;.y,..c..•·...clC..cll'_•...,,. ;/ ~~•~_.u.,,1--+~:....,
l1 ~-t
f,:1.'..•'.'..
1,.: ......... , T __ O.J!!.!:t•-~ '.

I • P.5 :
§j ! ___________ ] , ,0 ~
i ·, ---
_! L--1.· .,5~
r w-o
• 1'-(1""" .. :----,"'!' EX'
+; ..-1 --,,..-"-'::_:,,-. ---L
~:';:]
----------
211 r, -c~rxAVc
N'N' ?63-32 l -~0-00
N07E: NO FENCE OR WM...L SHALL
EE HIG!-:rn 1..J.AN t..•!' FROM EXlSLl~G
GRt,.,DE JN FRONT SETBACK

KEYNOTES
O.L S-"dllACKIJN:-: ;y,>

0.3 IJ,..'.-'DSCAf'i: PER !.ANDSCAF~ P'J.NS

0.4 '.):,~,"-Y
C 12 PnO?OSW S?A
( 16 AOJACENl''.iiSDfNCE, rsAP
C 19 l'RO?OSED,.\;;;CO/,OH-l~R:LOCAllO'/
1eos
architecture inc.

1. 7542 FAY AVENUE I!
' LA JOLLA CA 9203 7
PH: 858.459.0575
8~L: e:::r;(i;i.1.?CS:::1c.co-n I
11 .JENNIFER
BOLYN
Arch tect
ll) w ,___
u w 0
z => N w z °' 0 w <(
w
u5 ~u_ Cle: XI
X :JU ::::; w <( w I LU I z ro I
oc:
>-- a:,
N ~ 0 N ::5
z 0
<.I?
1 l O* 19~2022
41H SUBMITTAL
1 01-18-2023
51H SUBMITTAL
1 07-26-2023
6TH SUBMITTAL
08-23-2023
I : 711-' $J3MIT,~
'.
~
89-1 2-20;>3
C:OUN21,__j
' PHASE

PLANNING SET
,---·--r-:A_lE __ _
SP1
r-:-·• w--
I
I
I
I
rl
I
I
I
I
1 I
I
I
I
I
("'''-~•,
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I

LAUNDRY/CRAFT
EQQM
STQRAff/MFCH

BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN

KEYNOTES
7 1.2 .5i;.leACKLINE.1Yr
,cJTERIO"' WALL: :., , \'/OOC UO FRAM.>..;:; W/ 5,18·· GV.9 TH:iOUGHOJ:

I 1.S Ri:TAIN!NG WA.U.S FfR C?l<i..
------- ·-----------i--- 1.6 H'.iEOF-lfvl:LAEO\t'E

1.16 WM.XNl,1"F

1.17 DOOR. "ff
----------------~--- 1.21 UG'-IT\'.i:i.i..£0Ume,,wrrr1AN~DPEl1'-IANEN!~YAr'f~LAOOS~.\'fiHJ.W'iDl'H/.i0;1.ESSlnAN 12". ANOSl-'ALLPAO.:CCT NOT ~ESS T>¥,.N3" F'iOMTH': '.YA!.!., p;) SPAC:ON:)! MOr.:t !HAN 1e·oo CENTEli'\lRTICA:'.YFORl 1-:UUH:IG-HTOfTHEWAU..
1 1.26 I'll.Mai.NG f:x!URI;, '!Y?
---r--7
. -~-:~ I
" BEDROOM ONE I
I
_J
I
_J
® )
e 0 s architecture inc.
7542 FAY AVENUE
LA JOLLA CA 9203 7
PH: 858.459.0575
~L: e::::[email protected]
.JENNIFER
BOLYN
Architect
'" :.;;;. ..... ·-
··-••··
LO LU ...... u LU D
z :::,N LU z 0- 0 LU <(
V5
C::'.

LU ~~ x:r: X ::J (.) :::; UJ <( UJ I LU :r: z co :r: ,_ 00 <( NZ C!c'.
0 01 ::S
z 0
Cf)

REVISIONS
05-04-2022
1 ST SUBMITTAL
06-30-2022
2ND SUBMITTAL
108-25-2022
1 3RD SUBMITTAL
I!~ \~~j~JJAL
I
01-16-2023
51~. SUBMITTAL
05-20-2023
W,'2. REVIEW
06-05-2023
- ClTY_~OUf:!CIL __
07-28-2023
61H SUBMITTAL
08-23-2023
71H SUBMITTAL
09-12-2023
CllYCOUNCIL
PHASE

PLANNING SET
DA11': ----------------
07-27-2023
JOB NO
--1
21-19
BASEMSNT FLOOR ;:~AN
A1 .0
' I

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
\ I
\ I
I'
I.
-,
r
I
I I
\
i ✓-
t,a
I
[ KEYNOTES
l ffiC-,'<'fVUk lYI'
; 17 DOOR,Wi'
I I
IGI
I (
1~\ I
I " I 1
eos 1
I architec1ure Inc. I

I JENNIFER
SOLYN
Achtt~t
RE\liSIONS
'05-04-2022 1
1 sr suaMmAL
r 06-30-2022
2ND SUBMir.Al
i 08-25-2022
3RD SJBMl!.AL
110-19-2022
• 4TI-I S'...:3MlTTAL
jOl-18-2023
5TH S'J3M!TTAL
105-20-2023
'VAC ?EVIE\','
I 06-05-2023
IC!TY COUNCIL
06-23-2023
I 71H SUBMITTAL
09-12-2023
I CliY C00NCIL
PHASE
PLAN,:ING .icl I
I s~ --1
I 07-'.27~202]' _j
_,JOB NO _ j
i 21-19 i
A1 .1
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
y
I
~
~
s
I
Ii
I
I
I ~ ~
I
I
I
I
10-111/.t I I
I I
-.-_.l __
-------~------
I
-;lft'--,:'._DE,c':"'~,-.·.c-,---,lf-~
r

MASTER BEDROOM
FJ>];"67
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- __J -
I
I L I ' ------------------,.---------------------- ______________ J SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/4" - l'-0"
_ __J

KEYNOTES
'2 srn>ACK La'.'!'. m
EXilRIORWJ..l.EXT[r,.:)l'<RcJlSl-lPERcX!ERlORELEVAT!ONS !N",,\OE5/S m•,•c iNlTDORWt.:!.: 2~V:C'QD ST\10 i'RAf-liNG WJ 5/8"GW8 lhROVGHOUi

1.7 t.j,jfOi' 17.00FiO'/ERW,r;GASO·/t
l.t. UNlOFlO'ltUHEVlLBElOV.'
I I ti eu:c:.iwcAC·'<t:TRV
Ll2 HJS

1.13 WALK-INSl--lO'i','H<
LU !l!..EC<J-:

1.26 P'.1..MBlNGF!XfUR€.iYP

1.21 GAAVH 00 h.Al ~ Fo.1 AESTHETICS
U'JE ::Jf SK,1.•3H'! ,t,.!lG·I!:. ffR ROOF Pl.AN
® .
e 0 s architecture inc.
7542 FAY AVENUE
LA JOLLA CA 9203 7
PH: 858.459 .0575
IM'IL e::s@scroc.=n

JENNIFER
BO LY N _Arc:h1;:ec'::
.~~--•n=--i:t::·'.~~
,,,_
U)
UJ r-..
u UJ 0
z ::, ('J
UJ z 0- 0 LlJ <(
u5
UJ
c:: ~~ XI
>< ::JU ::::; LI.J <( UJ Iw I z co I a::> <( >-
c:: ('J z
0 N ::s
z 0
en
REVISIONS -·· 05-04-2022
1 ST SUBMITTAL
06-30-2022
2ND SUBMITTAL
08-25-2022
3RDSUBMl1TAL
10-19-2022
41H SUBMITTAL
01-18-2023
sr, I SUBMITTAL
05-20-2023
VA'::. REVIEW
06-05-2023
-- ~C:OUN9!,_ __
07-28-2023
6TH SUBMITTAL
05-23-2023
7TH SUBMITTAL
"""

CIJYCOUNCIL

PHASE I PLANNING SET
_ _QA~ - 07-27-2023
r-- JOBNQ -
I 21-19
SECOND rLOo~ PLA"i
A1 .2
i - _____ ,, ___
--,!<--I=- -, • '
i
t·----- :-::; -;-- ,I"-"
, I
I I
BASEMENT FAR DIAGRAM ii8" C 1"•0"
,!-'----------•-1-;_11_,. ___ _
W'lf!". 1t'.f l-l __ lt. 7'--ii~' i 21-~'
-·~\ - -- .. _!- - r,:· - ·1
I
I
I' I 0
/ \
,\ ~ '· \ 455 SF I
, ·-1 I \ I·.

I j /
..-------=--,,,,

FIRST FLOOR LIVABLF
1143 SF
I
_F_11_!~-1-~_T_F_L_O_O_R_F_A_R_D_IA_G_R_A_M __ <-9- _S_E_C_O_N_D_F_L_O_O_R_F_A_R_D_IA_G_R_A_M __ <~ 1/8" 1'-0' ·-__/ PRO..JECT FLOOR AREA
fflllii;JE6LH,SJQE~L
BASE:MENT LIVABLE

FIRST FLOOR LIVABLE

SECOHD FLOOR UVABLE
COVERED AND ENCi OSED EXTERIOR AREA
GllllAGf
SJ.!filQ1£,!.

Bft.SEMEt-.ff EXEMPTION
GLIEAGllXH,JEJPN
TQL!\.L. F:ilQ.POSE!)fLQQR ARE.A

TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA
PROPOSED FAA BELOW AlLOV/ASLE

TOTAL PROPOSED DECK AREA
1,612 SF
1,143 SF
724 SF
40 SF
_;l'5.fil:
-1.612 SE
..:.fJO.fil:

J...96'.Lll'

2.245.5 SF
283.5 SF
116SE
LEGEND
(a)
1 eos 1
I architecture Inc. I
.JENNIFER
BOLYN
A r c h t P cc t

REVISIONS
05-00-2022
, 1 ST SUBM!TTAL
106-30-2022
! l~~~~:o~;AL
3RD SUBMITTAL
: 10-19-2022
41H SUBMITTAL
101-18-2023
5TH S'J3MITTAL
I 05-20-2023
1VAC ~E:V1E\-V
, 06-05-2023
! CITY COUNCIL
08-23-2023
I nri susr,'.HTAL
09-12-2023
I IC!TYCOUNCIL
l- J09NO
21-19
A2.0
I
l
ij
I:

I
I
i
r
I
i @:;] L __ J ____ _
ROOF PLAN l/4" = l'-0
f
l
7 I
r - I :

FS,61.67
I §j
·~
ES. ,ti 67
I
- - - - - - - - _':~~·=-'='·=~'=··='·=··:::::"=::·=~-- - --- - J

KEYNOTES

3.2 .ieii!ACKi.lNE. TYF3.3 '.,:YI./Gtf

3.A HO-::)F OR.AJN
, .•
B.U.R 1'.~0i'i~G-
, .•
OECKELO.V
---------- . - - ·-_______ __,
eos
architecture inc.
7542 FAY AVENUE
lA JOLlA CA 9203 7
PH: 858.459.0575 ~L e:::s@ea;c:rc.o:m
..JENNIFER
BOLYN

REVISIONS
• 05• 4·2022
1 ST SUBMITTAL
06·30·2022
. 2ND SUBMITTAL
1 01-16-2023
_ 57H SUBI.11TTAL
I 05•20•2023
V.l1C RE\'IEW
06-05•2023

CITY COUNCIL
07•28·2023
61H SUBMITTAL
8•23·2023-
71H SUBMITTAL
00-12To2a
CITY _COUl'J91:_

PHASE I
PlANNING SET I
DAlt --~
----·-7
o7-27-202a I
JOBNO --7
21-19
A3.0
---T7,-------------------,_,_ F~ : 1C-TUN::_-:PRE1.JIJStY ---------------=-------r1 I [ol ~ 10,,.,,oi,;;; I PRCJ'cSEOc,SIGN ~"' O B I . TOPOF(UPPERJPARAPEL_-c~ I ♦ , T -• - =r J ,-- j . /_ !8LC(AM. ! J
1 I ·, • ' , - -1- - ~o· ,,,,7 1 --- - - - ~ - ___/
I i ! I • __ "___:_I! -- - -1- --· - ff+ - - _____ TOPOFFL>TROOF+8267~0'~i,:~- l V I 1-----------,.i;,: 4---1-------<------~ I)' 0-0 I, I ,, '""''''0 1 I ll~==y=7~'¥"7 I I ""''"""' ,, I I , I
i I 1 11~~~~~ d I ,I I ! I 2
I I I 1I I P•I 7 1
~I* ~~~!~~~~§~~~~ ,u ________ .._____ ::
'1 I I, k ~---!------------------~ I! -- _ -- _ _ -- _ -- __ SECONDFLOORFINISHEDFLOOR __ lO·ll"___.c,_ , /2,6l'iA 1JLS,_ J 'f" I I ,--------------, ___ ---{,2 I i I ! ------------< I _, 1! I I I !----------------< i
rr=[;J __ ----------- --- ~,~----!~t
i
.. -
I
I
I
..J
... _ GARAGE FINISH FLOOR __ o· -!l:__J,_
t 62 .6 7fA MS.~- \.f"--
FIRSHLOOll FIN~HED FLOOR • l' - 0' ~
BASEMENT FINISHED FLOOR -12 • 4- ..,50.l l(A.M S.l.J 1
____ -----,--I
------ I
rnourSS!lACK
i
I
! '
~fr-
.r, NORTH ELEVATION ~-; 1/4"~1·-o • --- ----------------------~ I I -,-1
TOP OF {UPPER) PARAPET 20' • l 0' s +83.50(A M S.l) 1
TOP OF FLATROOF 20 • J' ~
+8267(AMSlj 1
I SECOND FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR JO -~
I -72 .57{AM SL f "f'
I
I
t

KEYNOTES
\JNE Of ~D GOOE Al l\l.il.C'\'G I.IN€
3TLCCOflNi.9-'
~ 15 •a.CE 6,.C..,AJEPf.< IANOS-::AFi:Pl.AJfSNOTTO EXCl:E;;; 6-U'li:'GHTlll$:S5a&l,..C'-l42"1'J CRON'! SZl~~:K.V.'iJ .. ,\:lAOC',~.w,: .:"A!LC,'.'f-!'LEN~·/i,Jf/1," ·ASl5: ,Q?Et-; ·~ L!GH" '. Al:( 1 eos 1
I architec1ure Inc. I
.JENNIFER
BOLYN
. 2ND SJBMIJTAL
IOB-25-2022
3RD S'JBMIJTAL
i 10-19-2022
4TH SL,'3MtT:,'.\l
I os-20-202a
'VAC '?EVIEV/
JB-23-2023
1ns SUBMITTAL
J9-12-2023

I CITY COUNCIL
PHASE
r ·-::iLAN· JING~ :c·:!T -1
! __ ~-~--1
o?<:7-2023 I
JO~NO
21-19
&u "::.NG t.XTERICY<
E.!>~TlO\
A4.0
~ I
l------f]
I
I
JI
----
,ZO,O'
.,CU!::c,.....CK
--- 7--------
@]r-' ---ll
__ FS.+5217 I ---
... 60fSFI
l'Rf.EX:Sl!t,'G,
Cc'-OE
J.OY ,f4,17 I
l.O,P.-n11r-- I ,--t!
--,1, __ , I I
---
fl
G I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
1KEYNgTES
I " I::

I "
I "
I,.,
Pf,Of'i':RTYU.'SE M'
LIN! Ci- CA-":T~.:-.; GRADf:;.;, !!'..l{D,;,.G tt~E
UNt c: ei,O?Q CJ GRA-- ;..reu --;\1(;Llt
4~'.'Gl1Mr;:1A!l
,U4 s,1EST,',.lS
I'" fR.ClY?.

I t..26 S?A
"'
I'·" Pl:.OPOSF.D NC COf,:JEN:Sffl lOCATIO:i
,: .10 SfOlli ctA'.lD'./iG
~ ®
eos
archlteclure ,nc.

I rs~2, FAY AVENUE ...A JC _LA CA 92037
PH· 6S8,459 057' 5\/~l: ~~~

JENNIFER
BOLYN
Archit:ec~
REv1S1ONS
05-04~2:)22
i 1ST SUBMITTAL
J06-3Q.-2022
, 2ND SUBMITTAL
108 25-2'.122 . 31lD SU8h,111TA..
i 10-19-2022
I 4 H SUBIAITTAL
i 01 - 18-2023
t:, ~'1 SUB 'AlTTAI
I 05·20·2023 -
-!.':'1-'-C R~\'IEW
! 06-05-202:l ..
_i_cnv couNCI'
: 07-28-2023 I
;611-l SUSMITTA'
I !ou.23.2023 =---1
: 7TH SU_BMlllAL I
! I0?~2D2:l.
' CllY COUNCIL I

I PHASE
1 PtANNING SFT ~
21-)9
BLn: .. un~s fXiE~Vlf
ELEVATION:'
A4.1
I
I
L
~
---
,o.zy
I
I
I
I
I " 'i
I
I
I
I
I
I T.O ~ ~ 74 17
1---
1 J
;: , STQfo\Gf/H[;CH
I
I

HALIWAYI
'ill i
:",I-,
;Ji! I\ I
' w I I
=-II
I
"EDRCOMONE
]/
I
I
_I_
TOP OF (UPPER) PARAPET 2.0'. l :J S, / +83,~A/vl.Sl.J 1 _ ···-TOPOF_FIATROOF _20~~
+82. 1·7(A.M-> l J 1
r-, BUILDING SECTION 1,1· ~-u?:-M---------------------------------------------------------------- '--,,,1 l/4" • l'· □• '----------,---7 ~-----------------------------L __
r---§J ~ ! -------------- i------------1--
I
I
f--------=r,==,.::cn::.r:-=e<~----------,iL
'. fr~_UILOING SECTION
r
i
BEDROOM.lV/0
r;t7
T
fil6fil
7 - T -- ·- ;;,-- ---7 ---~
TOP OF fUPPER) PARAPET 20 - 1 0" ~
+B3,50(A M .3.L)
_TOf::_OF FlAT RQ9F_ 2.Q'. -LL
~
-,.,82 67(A tA S L.1-r
•
I I
.,/< '"°~::MC>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
L
cr-----+-.::i...-
I
~Ol(D FLO::>R f'i!'JSHED FLQ9R_ 1.Q: -4 " ·7267:AMSlj
j
I
~ GARA~Efli~!SHr~½~t1M·"~-; ~
• --'\. 1 Flr<Si FLOOf( F!N!SH!:DfLOOR •Ol 'lA1M·:~• ~
______ -·· _ _ __ ···- --i.-· a.;.SEf/fNTFll<SHSDFLOOR ·]L:A'.--6, '.)171•'.'SLI •

KEYNOTES
,1/lf OF F:c;C'kOSED 8./lOINS PAOA" £,:Cf'lC)I-;
1 eos 1
I archi1ecture Inc, I
.JENNIFER
BOLYN
A " C t· t r D t
1 i REViSIONS
I
' I 05-04-2022
'
'--+' .:.:l Sc.,T S::.:Jc::;3Ml.:c.c,TI•-"•1~..,
! 06-30-2022
?ND SUBMITTAL
I
I oe-2s-2022
3RD SUBMITTAL i
j 10-19-2C22 i 41H SL:3MITIAL
101-18-2023
'5TH SUBMITTAL i
1 05-20-2023
VN::.REVlEW I
lg~;J~~~CIL I 07-28-2023
l6Te SUBMITTAL ! 08-23-2023
171H SUBMITTAL I 0
' 091,202w I ! Cl:V COUNCIL

PHASE I
I
I I '.,J\TE ' ;..' -------'
• I 07-?7~20?3
! !,..I __ JO_B_N_'O_, --
! 21-19
I
i I
i A6.0 1
.,_ ________________________ I r---,1-----------·- I ~---~ I 1 V w - Sl0i::'-:.18AC.I, /
~
.!illQiE/',! illYLlIQR
r--,
FAMHYROQM ~
v'--_.;,;..-"----"-;.....,,....;.;__-----" _ __;_;_,.;; ________ _;_:_..::.:._.:....:.,;_.:.:.-:..___;___J i
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
,~ I ' I
:. I
,,AUt;;DRV/CRNl ' orv-,_u M 1
''-~!
I l
'I STORAGE/MECH rowoE~
- I i BEDROOM TWO
- I

I --- - ,--
L
I
I
-J-=-s
r9E.QrjUPPER) PARAPET ~ 1 o~_
/ +83.50jA.M.S.I .) ·---r
_ _ _ ___ 10£ OF F_IATROOF 20 - O' ~
+82.67{A.M.S L l
~~9t::JP F_LOO~ F~ISf::!!:D FLO_QR -:- _ l Q'_ ~ ()~-·
+7U,7fA.MS.L.)
_ ___ __ GARAGE FINISH FLOOR _ 0'. 0' ~
I +6?.6J(AJ~
·7 FIRSTFLOORFll<ISHEOFLOOR -1'•0' ~ +61 67{A.Msq
F OR FINISHED FLOOR _ l G • O' ---"'-
+ n67(AM S,L.J ~
,....._..._,-- _____ ----''R"-!!Si(!,st,TflNISHED__fLQQ!L _-1~ ,t-017{AMSLJ 'f"'
( 4 l ~/._; ING SECTION '---"

KEYNOTES
I" lit,;: Of£X;.TTit...'GGf..ADi:A1S'EClfON
j ss u:'llEC- ~:,oro:_:)W.t -.:::,PAc~· SECT!~•,
(a)
1eos
I architecture inc.

I 7542 FAY AVENUE
.A JOLLA CA 92037
j~L:~~~

REVISIONS
I 10-l 9-2022
4fr--l SUBi•1tTTAL
! 01- l 8-2023
6T--tSUBMITTAL
, 05-20-2023
f;;'~~~~~ I C!TY COUNClt
,01:w:2u23
i 61H SUBMITTAL
05~23-2C23
71H SUBMITTAL I
-·-ro::;_ 12-2623 ·----,
1 CITY COUNCIL
PHFSE

PLANNING SET
DAll:
07-27-2023
i-----JO_B_1_,o _ ___,
21-:9
I I
I A~~.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L __________ _

STORY POLE PLAN
L,q,..;· )fPk.OUS
s:QRYrCLES ----~
I
I
~----- --- ------ --- ------ ------ --- --J
1 eos 1
I architecture Inc. I

I JENNIFER
BOLYN
A ch te t
Ol-18-2023
I 51H SUBMiTTAl I
CS-20 2022
I- !~~~:;~~ -l
1~;~;.~~~3Cll I
1~~2~;~~q 7TI-l .5~)3MIT::...l
I o9-12-202a
,-:1TY C:·:>UN:"-::IL
AB. □
l-
!j
----41~
( 1~ WEST ELEVATION , __ _.,, 1W 1'-0'
----,(-
,..___ NORTH ELEVATION 0 1/4"=1'-0'
ll.'I!•~.
@lw-- 1 "Jso:_ t=~?17--:i
jEG i 61 e1• I 61.H I ~ 6267'.
.:tl. ____ ~---L~. 52:__,. ~~~-
··;rt· <261' c;;;,-·---11; 1P 0'50
1 -1
~-
l
,)t SOES:HiACK
I
+
j
I--SEC_QND FLOO]l_FINISHED QOOJL_ _ _] o~
1 +72 ;7(A.M ·L,J
I
I
_ . GARfSE FIN~H FLOOR __ 0~
-62.67{A M.S,L.J 'f'
FIRS1 FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR -1'. 0' -$- .c 67!A,.W~l J
--'i<--- _ BASEMEN1FINISHED FLOOR _ -12'. 6' ·$- +SO '7tA~gL.) _ .SECOND FLOOR ~IMISHED FLOOR ___ 10. )_:-{'j,.
+72 671AM,S.L) 1
~MEJ:!Hllllfilj_ED FLQflR : -1,'._:_ 6' --6, + ~o l7(A M S.L.! 1 ®
eos
arctlllecture inc.
7542 FAY AVENUE
LA JCLLA CA 92037
PH 858,459.0575
~L·~cccm
.JENNIFER
BOLYN
Ar~h1'!:ect:

I 01-18-2023
511--. SUBMITTAL
i 05-20~2023
-~AC REVIEW __ _
i 06-05-2023
--ifl°TY COUNCI' __
107-28-2023
_01l'SUB~'!!TI:'l _
J Ob-23-2023
i 711-1 SUBMITTAL
OS- l 2·2023
__ ! CllY COUNCIL_,
PHASE
P\ANNINGSET
DATE
07-27-2023
JOB NO.
21-19
STORY POc[S ELFVATIOO$
A6.1
a.~:1,:.,
~Ir~. 72a·7 -~~161'
f,r; 1,c;
~-~---
;61 TP i 7417
'G ~1.6T 6' 67'
~Gi 7".'.66 72,60
__ H __ ,,_· _I_Y :1
I
•
Pt 7::.;7
l FGj 61,_,r
tG1 609.3
-----------------~------------
11',----EAST ELEVATION , __ ,/ ,/4"= l'-0
I
t-- -
-----
~G 6Gn: l-07:, 7!:.17
Fl-! 2277 l 134.J 620T
6114
•
_ .. IOPOf UPPERPARAFi:1 __ 2l'~ iO" -~
TOP 0 .. F fUPJE·R· I PARAPET·"'% -JD' --6,- - __ TOPOFFLATROOF _ 20~ •82.f]IA.MS~ \ I
_BASEMENT £jNISHED FLQOR __ ·_1_2 -~-
• n:..M s ~i --~
SECOND FLOOR FfNISHED FLOOR I 0~
•72 :>7{/d/~ "!
_§_ARA_f;E F!!~ISH tb.00.JL_ _ Q~
~'i,AM
FJ!l§_T FLQQR F~HED fLOO!!__ ___:]' -4_
__ BASEl~f'rrFif!lli_YEDf!OOR_ J2':L..J;.- ·5' ..... ;;i,;:,..1,.., .• 1 , 1 eos 1
\ architecture Inc. \

JENNIFER
BOLYN
A co
I REViSIONS r -s~--4-~2~02~2-----i
! ~ ST Su8M!TTAL
i 06·30-2022
, 2ND SJBMffiAL
I oe-2s-2022
3RD SUBMITTAL
; 10-l 9-2C22
• 41H S'JBMITTAL
101.18-2023
51H S1-'BMITTAL
• 06-05-2023
lc11YCOJNCIL
. 07-28-2023
I 6 t-i SUBMITTAL
08-23-2023
In, SUBMITTAL
09-7 2-2023
i ! CITY COUNCIL

I PHASE
1 Ot.M'IING5~
I c:AJE • r--·----.

I 07-27-2073 !
JOSNO

21.19 AB.2 \
I

EASEMENTS
THIS SUIIVEY WAS Pf/EPAR@ 1'1TH THE'. BfNEF/f OF A PREJJMIN4RY TTTL£ REP<!m" FROM FIRST AMf:RIC'N T1TL£ CCMPAflr', ORt'~R NO DN-66834.~0 (04-), DA.FD S£P,EM8ER 2, 2021. s;JD REPO.'ll INIXCAif.S THE FOLLOWING IBEMENTS A/IE l>FFECTING Tri£ SUBJECT PROPERTY:
/•}.' 6d.$£U8({ FOR LJTHER 08 8/JTtl PO:..C LJN[S, UN.JJ;.1?GROJND CONDUiIS TOGETHER WITH Tf'fE RIGHT OF INGRESS »ID EGRfSS AND PUBLJC UTILJTTE:s ANO INC/000-M PU/IPOSE:5 TO 8£N£F/f ~r!Ckt IN THt DOCUIJENT ME'COR~;D Af'~!L OT. 192.!. IN BC'Jk 1CC6 01 DEED~, PACE: 24.

NI fJ,Sf/,IENT FOR WATER WJNS, TOGETHER i+mi Af.L RIGHTS OF INGRESS TO NID l'GRE5S FROM s;:.JD W,.!TER l.!4,.NS FCf'l PUP.POSE OF /IJ5P£C~"IG. r'?[PAJR{,\':; AND REl..AtiNG 91,1£ AJ<!J /M.')OOOA PURPOSES TO BENEFIT SANTA Ft IRRIGATION DISTRICT IN TH£ DOCU/.100 RECORD@ !XTO/JER 24, 1925 IN BOOK 1115 OF OEffJS, PNJE 402.

THE CASEMENT NUI./BERING REPLJCATES THE €XC£P110NS AND EXCLUSIONS NUM8£RtNG or THE SAID mu: P[PORT PLOTT4BL£ EAStNEf-.fTS AR£ /NC,'::AT£D WfTh ,; CIRCLE 10 0
----- 10
SCALE: r-10
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
20 I
I
L
30 i
BLDG
!!!!!
BO.BE
ROOF
rRICGE

SIERRA AVENUE
(tC PV!.ff) ~ "·"' +5433
-t-5557 55,G:i+ 7"547U
+S-545
755.6E
+ 59.46
BLDG
72 28 I
ii!i /
P.,DG5.

ROC"" :

RtDGF:~
I
BLDG JW +.5604
+6'.:55
-63.59 +E371
.1.5435
+544!:
72 3; \ .... ROOF
RIDGE
BRICK
-57.51
'54T!.
+55,1'
+SS.80
I + '°·"
,s,r
I -'-5713
+5753
+5823
+6438
+6432
BLDG
-I
l ... 9172
CHIMNEY_/
I
I
I 80.27
ROOF I {RIDGE i
'
I
I
ROW I
I
,b- pp TB~':1 FH +66:l! -i.6Gti9 i
~r;:f::::;;;;;~====~~~--;;;;··=•,:::::;=:=~\;:==: __ ~,=\i= _____ ==_=..-=;;::=====;,=~c:;:"=~~~=C=ON=C=C=U~RB::::=====-----i ·~\C, t"'~~--56---· ?J~ ~;~
i
I
~s·
----- ___ __. .j'fr ;:j.\,:0 ~~_\:.:.
1V HELIX A VE1VUE
---(AC PVl,IT) - ---- ---- <r.--- 30'
PROP£RTY LIN£ (R£CORO)
WT UN£ (OFFS/TE")
STREIT c£NT£RLINE

RIGHT OF WAY LINE

CONCRETE CURB

CONTOUR
SPOT E:lE:vA T/ON

BUILDING FOOTPRINT
WOOD FE.NCI::

FREE STANDING WALL

RETAINING WALL

POWER POLE

FIRC HYDRANT
BRUSHL!NE, BUSHES
TR££; PLANT; PAW
LEGEND
5,.lfL.PWG
-----ROW-
~~~90~~~
~ + '. : o.oc
-~

ABBREV/A TIONS
AC
BLDG
8LK
BRK
BW
Ii.

C; CONC
CMU
El.I
£LEV
FF
/f.; Fl
F/P
ASPHAL TIC CONCR[T[

BU/WING
BLOCK
BRICK
GRADE AT 801TOI.I OF WALL
CENTER UN£

CONCRITE
CONCRETF: MASONRY UNIT

ELECTRIC METER
£lEVATION

FINISH FLOOR

FLOW LINE
FIRE P!T
GM
HB
PLTR
POR.

Pl/MT
SMH
SWlK
711W
nv
)Yp
WM
1W
NOTES

CAS MCTER

HOSE BJBB
PLANTcTI

PQRTTC'N
PAVtA/£1/7
SElff/1 1,/ANH'JLE

SIDEWALK
GRAD£ AT TOP OF RETNNING WALL
TOP or WALL
1YPJCAt
lt:47ER MErER

WATER VALVE

1. THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS PERFOR/.1£0 FOR THE PURPOS[S OF A SPECIFIC PROJECT. AND SOME AREAS MAY HAVE GREATER OR LESSER DETA!L BASED ON PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.

CHANGES TO THE SCOPE. DESIGNcR, OR LOCATION OF WORK MAY REQUIRE THAT AOOITTONAL SURVEYING BE PERFORMED TO S4TISFY THE NEW Fi£0UIREMENTS

2. THIS IS A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY OR RECORD OF SURVEY. TH£ PROPERTY LJN[S DEPICTED ON THIS PL4N ARE GENERATED FROM EXISTING PUBUC RECorw WPS, DRAWINGS, OR 0£SCRIPTIONS. THE PROP[RTY LINES AND/OR EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN /NCWDE:0 TO REPRESENT THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATJONS R£1Am'E" TO TH£ TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES.

3. THE LOCATIONS OF UTILJTIES. IF ANY, SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AR[ G[NFJ?AT£D FRO!.' RECORDS PROV/OED BY UTILITY/GOVERNING AGENCIES AND/OR FIELD DATA COLLECTED DURING THE SURVEY.

THE PWmNG OF UTILITIES ON THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A GUARANTEE OF TrlEJR LOCATION. DEPTH, Sil[, OR TYPE.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 16, BLOCK 21, SOL4NA BS4CH, MAP 1749, !N THE CITY OF SO!..ANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STAT£ OF CAL/FORNl4, FILED JN THE omc[ OF THE COUNrt RE.CORDER MAY 5, 1923.

APN: 263-321-21-00

BENCHMARK
ENC-43 - 3.5" NG$ DISK IN HfAOWAU.., £4ST SfDE N·eo HWY 101. 0.2 Ml N'LY SOI.ANA '/!STA DR ELEV = 34.67; DATUM: NAVOBB; CITY OF SOLANA BEACH SURVEY CONTROL (ROS 18971). {J
0 m
):>
z
\ 5
101 \
C
f' I
,._
,, " I --- V • ~@ ' ' ' C
1',
,·.

VICINITY MAP THOMAS BRUS. MAP 1 I 67-£7
NO SCA! [
u ~
z iii
&
(.9 i
z 0
fl:::
w i
w if
z r,
0 ~ <
u
z 6
0 w ;;
>- ~ ci
w ;;
u... iil LL.
0 -
2 u ~
iii
t
~
~ 9 (IJ~
::Sc
tl t: r,. §: Cs
0::: '::t:~
~ .!:$ u
Qj.i::
l:: le
~ '€ (!J
0 tQ
0 ~~
co~ tQ ~~
lg ).. DRAYlN BY: DK
i~
~ CHECKED BY: JC
~ 2/9/22 w ORIGINAL
"'
~ REMS/Oil 1 8/24/23
~ RE\-1SI0/12 CJ
~ ..,, /IE\-fSIOII J
'" u R/'11SI0/14
~ ...... 11£W1/Jl/5 V\
~ TOPOGRAPHIC
~ SURVEY PLAN
~
~
\!) SCALE: 1"=20'
~
~ ~ C.O
ls
I:: e 51/T __ / _ OF __ /_ SHTS '5

GENERAL NOTES

1. JlPPROVAJ.. OF THIS G,~/NG PLAN D:'JES #OT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF VERTFCfti CIR HOR!ZO'IT'AL ALfG.\1,!ENT Cf ANY PRIVATE. ROADS.HOV-IN t'.EREJN FOR ?/&UC ROAD PURPOSES.

2. FfNAL APPRO'/AL OF THESE GRADJt,J PW.'S fSSUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL OF T'rEASSXlAIEO I/JPROVEl.!5NT PUNS Yt-lERc AP/'1./CA!llE. f/NJ.J. Ci/RB GRADE E!iiVATIONS M4 Y REQ!Jl/lli CP.NIGES INTH!'SEPU-NS.
3 WPORTMA7ERlAL5SHA1.LSELEGAU.YOBTA!t,'ED.

4. A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE CfIT ENGllaiER W.U BE RiQIJ!RE.D FOR AN'( IYQ\K IN TH£ PLIBLJC RIGHT..QF-WAY.
5 ALL st.OPES OVER THREE (3) FEET IN HEIGHT SHAU. BE LINOSCAPED NIO IRRJGATED

6. TI/E CCMRACTOR 5.~W. VERIFY11'£ EXISTENCE A/iD LOCATION Of AU. UTILITIES SEFOfii:

COMMENCING WORK. NOTICE OF PRCfJOSED WMK SHAU.Sf GIi/EN TO 11£ FOLJ.0WINGAGENCIE$.

UNDERGROU,'::JS.A • (800)-422-4133, CRCA!..L811
l. Tl'£ SOILS REPORTS SHALL l!!c FR(MO£[) AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF W.A/IA BEACHPR/00 1U ISSUA'ICE OF GRA!Ji.','G PER.MIT.
s. APPF..OVAL ~rnES~ PWJS BYTH~ CITY rf.;:;JNEl:t? DOES gor AITTHORIZc ANYWCRK ~ GRAlf.W; TO Ii< PERFc.MED UIIT/l TH£ PROPiR1Y Olnl".R'S PERMiS5/CW W.S BEfill 08TA/liED AJ,iJA VALJD G.t?.ADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.
9 THE Gin' ENGINEER'S APPROVAL CFTHESEPLANSDOES NOTCONSTmtTETHE BUILDING OFFICIAL'S AfP/!()Vt,J., OF NIY FOUI/DATIDN FOR STRUCTI/ilES TO BE P,.,ACED ON TH!' AREA Cl'JVER/'1J BY 'l!!"SE PW1'$, NO l-',}JV'"cR Qf THE GRAD/I.~ ORDINP.HCE- R£QIJ!Ra,!ENT.S C~l/NG AUi/MUM COVER OVE'R EXPANSIVE. SOII.S IS AW)£ OR IMPLIED.
1Q ALL OPiiRA'TIONS CONDUCTED 0/J THE PREMISES, INCLUDING r,/li WA~WNG UP, RliPAIR. ARR;vN.., DEPARTURE OR RUNNING OF TRUCKS, EAFm/MOVING EQI.J!l'M£tlc coosmucrn:w EQUIPMENT ~ND ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED GRADING EQUIPt,ff:JITSH>\.!.LBE W,frTED TO THE Pf:RIOD BETWEEN 7:00AM.

AND S:Do AM. EACH DAY, f,fONDA Y THROUGH FRIDAY, M'D NO EAR1HMOVING OR GRADING OPEFA1'10NS S,t./Al.L BE' CONDUCTED ONTHE' PREVtS!;SON S4MDAYS, SW.JOAYS ORHOUOAY.S WITHOUT THE WRrTTidl PERM;SSI0/1 OF THii CITY EliG11/EliR. 11 ALL J,f.VCR. S~OPE5 SHALL BE ROU,',:'ED INTO EXJSWJG TEidAJN TO PRODUCE A CONTOU,RED TRANSITION FROM CUT OR FU S!JRrACE510NA1VRAL GRO!.!NDN{{)ABUfTfNGCUT ORRU 51iRFACES.

12. NOTWITHSTAND!NG THE MINIMUM STAA'DARDS S..~FOOTH IN THC GRADING ORD'INN,'CE, AND NOTI'flTHST)f,'D/NG THE ~F.ROVN OrTH.ESE GRADi'NGPLA'JS. TH!: PERMiTTEE IS RESPONSIBLE /OR T1iE PREVENT/OIi OF DAIMGE TO THE ADJACENT PROl'ERJY, ND PERSON SHAl1. EXc-\VAIE OIi LAND SOC! OS£ ro THE PIIOPER1Y LINE AS TO ENl)AflG!'R AJIY ADJOIN!/16 PUBI.IC STREET, SllJEWALJ( ALlEY. FUNCU0/1 OF Af/Y SEWAGE DISPOSAi. SYSTEM, OR AJIY OTlfER P1JBLJC OR PR/VAil: PROPERTY WTTHOUT SLJPPORTING AND PROTECTING SUCH PRo::ERTY FROM Sfrn.lNG, CRACKING, EROSlO\/, SILTING SCOUR OR OTH£R LMW.GE WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROU THE GRADING DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAN THE Cm' ~1U HOW THE PER!.ITTTEE RESPalSIBLE FOR CORRECTJ0-1 ON !.'OUDED!CATED IMPROVEMENTS WHICH OA.-VAGE AD-JACE.NT PROPERTY.
13 SLOPE RATfOS: CUT 2.1 FILL 2:1
CUT; 0-CY FlLL: 2J3 CY IMPORT: 233 CY
(NOTE" A SEPARATE VAUD PERMJT MUST £XISTFOR. OfFSfTE II/PORTOR EXPOOT AliE4S.) "ry"f{£ OUANTmES ESWIATED ABOVE ARE FOR. PERI/IT PURPOSES ON!..Y AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS. CONTRACTORS Ar{£ RESPONSlE!.E FOR THBR mm £A'qTHWORl< DUANTffiES.
14 SPECL4L CONJfTfONS fF Afft ARCHA.ELOGICAL RESOURCES ARE DISCOVERED OtJ THE SfTE OF TH!S

GRADING DURING G/WJING OPERATIONS, SUCH OPERATIONS MLL CEASE IMMEDIATELY, AND THE P£RMITTEE \W..1. NOTIFY TH= CITY EflGfNEER OF 77-f= DJSCO'll:RY: GRADmG -OPERATIONS WILL NOT COMMENCE wmL THE PERM!TTEE /-I.AS RECEIVED r'i'RIITEN AUTHORITY FROM THE CITY ENGINEER TO 00SO.

15. ALL GRAD!NG SHOYrN ON THJS Pl.AH SHALL BE COMPLETED AS A SiNGU'.AR UNfT WITH flOPROVISJON FOR PARTIAL RELEASES. SHOULD ITBE ANTICJPATED mAT A PORnON OF THIS PROJECT BE COM;:::U:TED SEPARATELY, A SEPARATE PlA\' AND PERMIT J.PPUCATJON SHAU.BE SUBMrTTEDFOR

APPROVAL

16. THE CONTRACTOR SHAU. NOTIFY THE. C1TY OF SOLAUA BEACH 658.720.247024 HOLJitS BEFORE GRADING OPERATIONS BEGIN.

17. FL¾'ISHED GRADING AND PLANTING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED OV Al.L SLOPES PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, OR IM!IEDIA7Et. Y UPON COMPLETION OF A"IY SLOPES GRA!J=D BETWEEN OCTDB...~ 1 AND APRIL 1 PRJOR TO ANY PLAN7HIG,ALL LANDSCAPING SHALJ. BE APPROVED BY THE PLAN!V:NGDEPN~TMEt,T AT THE DEVELOPIIEIITREVIEWSTAGE; OR BYSEPAAAIE LANDSCAPE PUN.

18. ALL OfF--SITEHAt'L ROUTES SHALL BE S'JBMITTEDBY THE CONTRACTOR TO 1HEC11YENGJNEERfOR APPROVAL 72 HO/JRSPRJOR TO THE BEGiNNING OFwaYC
19, UPON FINA-l COMPL.ETJON OF THE VAJRK UNDER THE GRADING PERMIT, 81/T PRIOR TO FINAL GR4DING APPROVAL AND/OR FfNAL RELEASE OF SECURJTY,FR/OR TO FINAL GRADING APPRO'./ALAND/OR FiNAL RB.EASE OF SECURJTY, f.N AS-GRADED CERTIFICATE SHALL BE PRCVIDED STATING. "THE GRADING UNDER PERMIT ND. SBGR-~ HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN SUBSTANTIAL COOFORJMNCE ttmf THE APPROVEDG.t?ADING PLAN ORASSHYNN ON THEATTACHEOAS-GRADED PLAN". THISSTATEMEtrT SH.ALL BE FOUCh'tEDBY 7HE DATE NU) SfGNATURE OF THE CML ENGINEER ~HO CERTIFIES SUCH A GRAD/1/G OPERAT/0!/

20. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OESJGN, CONSTRUCT, AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES INCLUDING SHOO!NG,M.'D SHALL BERESPONS!BLE FOR CCWFORMfNG TOAU. LOCAL, STATE, I-ND FEDERAL $-l!FEn-' ANDHEA!.TH STNiDARDS, LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

EROSION CONTROL NOTES

1. STCRMWATE"RlrNDNON-STORMYIATERD!SCHARGECONTROl.:BESTIINIAGEMENT PRACTTCES S.YALI.. ee De-vROPED AND f!IPLEME.'f-lTED TO 11...w,\GE STOR!l WATER AND flON-STORM W~TER DISCHARGES FROM THE SfTEAT M.L Ti!,€S CVR.!NG EXCAVATION ANO GRAD:NGACT/vmES. 2 EROSFOH AND SED1M!:NT CONTROL- EROSION PR.EVENliON SHALL 8E Ef.lPHAS!ZEDAS THE MOST 'VPORTft 1JT JEASURE FOR KEPJNG smfME!rr ON $.'if DL!RNGEXC.t.VATl'J.'l AND {';.Q.Ai)/1:3 A;;TWiT~S, SE.DiMENT CONTROLS s...i.lJ18£ USED ASA SU?PlEMEJ{iTO £ROSIO,\ FR..l=VE.Jma-1 FDR ICEEFING SEDIMENT (NJ SITE'.

EROSION CONTROL OI/SlCPES SHAJ.LSE U/TlGATeOBY INSTALLING LANDSCAPING AS PER A"FROVED !,4/l!)SOO'f PWIS <S REC'JIRED BY 1HI' D£VROPMENT REVIEW CO/IO!TJOtlS. OR BY TEMPCRARYER~O.•; CONTRC' .. co•,=ORM:.';::; TO Tr:' FO!.LO'it'ING LBS.'I.CRE
2J
50 6 '
_7_
91 PLO"r"TEDE."J4/2D23
t,::'l.fRR,::;.4TED hYDROS!:EOM!X l'Y1TH A FiEER MkiRJX AHL/ED AT 4 OfJO UJIACF,£. % Pt'RITYIACRf
lD1'PLUS
SCAR!Fi.D
SO!<PLIJS
ArRl"LEXGL4t;.;A
Pl,.NITAGE tNSUl.AR.IS
WCELJS FARINOSA.

LOWS SCOPAJWS E!XCHSCHOt. TZIA. CALIF.

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
l~--
.1 r~~ro I i PUiiP
. Ld_ ___ _

DETENTION VAULT DETAIL
NOTTO SCA!.£
NOTES: DETEflTIOfl VAULTDE'SIGI-IED
TCJAAO'liDE250CFOFSTORAG~ SEE
Pl.AN FOR ELEVATIONS.

EROSION CONTROL NOTES· CONTINUED

1. THE'TOPS OFAU. SLOPES TALLER THAN 5'SHALLBE D.'KEDOR TRENCHED TOPREVEtJTWATER FLOWING OVER CRESTS OF SLOr"ES

2. CATCH 8ASJN5, CESJL TING BASINS, AND STORM DRAJN SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO TH::

SATISFACTIOV OF rriE CITY ENGINEER

3. SIJHJBAG CHECK DAYS, S!LTFENCES, FIBER ROUS On OTHER.APPROVED BMP'S SHAI.LBEPlACEC tNUN:::tAVEDAREAS t,'lfTH GAADIENTS IN EXCESS OF 21, AS wa.LASAT OR NEAR EVERY POINT f',HERECONCENTRATEDFLOWLEAYE TrlESfTE

4. SAND BAGS SHA!.L BE Pf.ACED ON THE !JPSTREl<M SIDE OF AU DRAINAGE INL.~S TO MINIMIZE SILT BUILDUP IN THE INLETS AV{) PiPES.

5. TriE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPA!,~ ANY ERODED SLOPES AS DIRECTED BY THE OFFICE OF THE CHY ENG/NEER.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP ROADWAYSAfJDENTRANCES TO ANO FROfl, iHE SITE ONA REGULJ.R BASIS TO KEEP THEM FREE OFSOIL ACCUMUl.ATIOH AND AT ALL OTHER TIMES Dlf?ECTED BY THE CnY E\'G!NEFR

7. THE CONTRACTOR SH.All. WATER SITE ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS TO MiN/MiZE AIR BORNE DUST CREA TEO tROM GRADING ANOHAUUNG OPERATIONS OR EXCESSIVE W,NO CONDITIONS, AND AT ALL mes D,'RECTED .9Y TJE CITY E.','G!NEER

6. INTH!i. EVENT SILT DOl!SENTERTHE EXISTl,'iGPUi!UCSTORMC/RAJNSYSTE/,1_ REMOVAL OF THE SU Fi=UMTh'E THE SYSTEM ,'//U fE DONE AT THE C!:VEUY'ER'S EXPENSE

EARTHWORK
S!Ti GRMJf11G (OUTS!O= STRUCTUiiE)
SITC GRAD.•,:::; (EEL:JWSTRUCTIJi'IC)
~VATE FOR FC!JTINGS
REMOVAL+ RECOM?ACT
TOTA!.GRAE"NG·C'.JTfFI/J /OUTS!Jc

MAX CUT

11.A.'(FJU
21 PT

2.0 FT
CUT 8' Ci'
FILJ. 45 CY
':Jr 7E2 CY
FR.L O CY
18 CY
ZE.3 Ci
435 C\'
CfiY A-.l:Ai'C',cDO-V..1,JeS APP'D CATE
Z3' Hif1.$Tl31
SOLANA BEA.Cr'
AP!/~24-22-00
228 N HELIX AVENUE
211NSIERRAAVE
S01..AHABeACH
APN: 263-321-24---00

SINGLE FAMILY
FF61.67

BASEMENT
'-FF51.17

NHELIXAVE
SITE PLAN 1"=-10'
VICINITY MAP t•=soo·
l
211N,S!ERRAAVE#1

S/VJ/ABEACH
APl/:~1·=

WNHEUXAVE
SDUNA/!EACH
AFN.263-32/-204;
ALL ROOF DRAINS Sff4L1. FLowil
_INTO LANDSCAPED AREAS. d
//JSAFl).J .J:!! \_//JS.1FIJ,
APPROX. EX WATER UNEJ iO 8£ FIELD VERJFIED
/°"t_,.~fa~R F/ELDVERJF/ED
APPROX EX SE\\£R LINE_/ TO BE FIELD VfRfAED

EASEMENTS
_!
OJ
[I]

AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE WIES, UNDERGROUND CONOUITS TOGETHER Vr'fTH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDEt-lTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUM£NTR/iCOR/JEDAPRil. 01, 1924 IN 8Q()I( 1006DFD£EDS. PAGE 24.

AN EASEMENT FOR. WATER MAINS, TOGETHER WITH ALL RIGHTS OF 11-.'GRESS iOAND EGRESS FROM SAID WATER MAiNS FOR PURPOSES OF INSPECTTNG, REPAIRING AND REU YING SAM£ AND INCIDENTt,J., PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER Z., 1925 IN BOOK 1115 OF DEEDS, PAGE 402

IMPERVIOUS/ PERVIOUS AREAS (WIIN PARCEL)
EX!STJNG CONDITlON
IMPERVIOUS:

P£RVIOUS:

ABBREVIATIONS

INVERT ELEVATION

FINISHED FLOOR
FINISHED GRAD£

FINISHED SURFACE

PLOW LINE

EDGE OF ASPHALT
EX/STl.'IG GRADE
PROPOSED CONDITlON
f, 139 SF IMPERVIOUS: Z934 SF
O SF
1,557 SF
3,352 SP REMOVE/ REFUCE
PERVIOUS:

IE
FF
FG
FS
FL
EA
EG

TOP OF CURB

TOPDFGRATE
IMTCHEX!S1fNG ELEVATJOO

FRO/IT YARD SETBACK

REAR YARD SETBACK
SIDE Y_.!RD SETB.4CK
DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHA=R=G=°E=====
TC
TG
(FG)
FYSB
RYSB
SY.S8
I, JASON A SA!flOS, HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINE.ER o;: WORK FOR THiS PROJECT.

THAT 1 IMVE EXCERCISED RESPONS/BlE CHARGE OVER THE DES/GIi OF THE PROJECT AS (';FINED IN SECTION 6703 Or THI; B/JSfl\ESS Af{D PROf£SSJONS COOE:, ANO tt-1£ DES;GN IS CONSISTENr w,m CURRENT STNJDAR!JS AND THE CITY OF sow« BEACH Dr<P NO. 20-007.

I UNDERSTAND IHATllili CHECK OF PROJECTDRAWIIIGSAJ/0 SPECIFICATIONS BYTt/£ CITY OF SDUNA BEACH IS CCWFINED TO A REVIEW GIil Y A/10 DOES NOT RELIEVE Ml' OF RESPONSl!!I/JTIES FOR PROJECT DESIGN.

BY. _________ _
JASON A SANTO$
RCE NO. 85418 EXP 3131/2023 0 10
PASCO IARET SUITER & ASSOO/\ TES
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BENCHMARK CITY OF SOLANA BE.ACH DESCRIPTTDN BASED ON 3 5' NGS DISK IN HEADWALL. EASE S.'OE --------1,-::_-::_-::_+t-_-_--'- SY, _________ DAT!i.- ____ SY _________ DA7E: ___ _ OF HIGHWAY 101, AS SHOWN OIi ROS 16971 AS LIITE ----· "'_-::::-====-------_-_::~::_-_::::::_::::-_>--+---- l'Cll'MIWJS4\IIW(C/TYE11G!Nf£R SOUl-1. 228 NORTH HEUX AVENUE i:Xi':11311/5 SY, DAiE: ___ R.C.E.:37145 ELEV,; 34,67 DATUM NAvtJSS BOWERSPiiSIC€Jlt<

WORK TO BE DONE
THE. /1.fPRO','EJ.lENTS CONSIST Of Trl'EFV-LOWlf,'G l~K TOBE. D~Ac;;ORD!liG TO Tr'ESE Pc.ANS MID THE l.AIEST EDITIOl/5 OF,
STAJIIJARDSPfCJF/CAT/0/IS
A STANDARD SrECJFICATIONS FOR PUF!UC Y.-'rn:KS cry/STRUCT/c»J /,t;CLU01'.'G TU£ ~GIOl-1~ SUrPLEMElirAL.AM;;tJDMEHIS.

B. CAUFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSl'ORTA110N 'IMNUAL OF TRi'FFJC CCW'IROLSFOR CO.'.'STRUCTIONA,';J MAINTENANCE. ~fQli.K ZONES.

C. STA'IE OF CALll'!JRNIA, D,PARMNT OF TIW/SPORTATIOII STAI/OARD SPECmCATIONS

STAI/OARD DRAWJ,GS
A SAN DIEGO REG/oo,,L STAN!JA.f<D OR.AWJ-IG-S
B. STATE OfCALIF~!A., DEP~RTMENT OF TRt,,NSPOFffATIOt.' STANDARJ)PlAHS

PROPERTY INFORMA T/ON
SllEAfJDRiSS
228 NORTH HEW( AVE//UI'
SV..ANA BEACH, CA !12075
ACCESSOR PARCEL NIJIJEfRS:
26J,Jlf.21-00

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
COFF'EYENGlNEERlt.'G, tNC
558-831.0111
C,',~lERI F=.'RMITTEE
PE/WITl:E: RYAN BO'J,£'RS
O'l.'UER: RO~J'il) GIATTS
CO'lPANY
PHONE
AODRESS 9566BUS!/1£SSPARKAVEMIE, SUITl'ZW. SAND/EGO, CA, 9!131 LE_GAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 16, BLOCK 21, SOLANA BEACH, /!AP 1749, IN THE CITY OF Seu.NA BEACH, CO{IN'IY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALJFORNIA.FfLEOIN1h"E OFFI::E. OF Tiii?GOUNTYRE.CORDER MAY 5, 1923.

LEGEND
rriM DESSi~.IPTfC,'✓
AA~RTYUNE

CENTERLINE OF ROAD

SETBACKS
GRADING llMffS
STORl,/ DRAIN. 4' PVC (!11.°"
• STOOt;'t, SYYBOL
'I' "' "' "'
STORJJDRAJNFC.,q,CEMAJ.'J,PERPLI.JMB!SGCOOSULTANT - SDFM - - RETAINING WALL, SEE NOTE@ SDRSD • C4 M -W +Hi .... i+i + SEE NOTE @ SDRSD- C9 SiRUCTUR.AL WALL, SEE NOTE @
LANDSCAPE FENCE --x--x--x--

HARDSCAPE
DECOMPOSED GRAN/Te
RIP RAP, NO. 2 BACKING

BASEMENT UM/TS
SDRSO•D40

PRELIMINARY GRADING NOTES
CD
CD
Q)
0 CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
'.ID
EXISTING HYDRANT TO BE RELOCATED± 11
EXISTING WATER METER TO PROTECi IN Pl.ACE
EXIS11NG RETAJN,'NG WALL TD REMAIN.,. NOT DISTURBED
EXIST!.'-IG FENCE TO REMAIN AND NOT DISWRBED
EXiS1fNG UTIL!TY POLE.- GUY Wm£ TO REMAIN AND NOT DISTUna

SPA BY OTHERS
LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE SEE UJlDSCA"EARCHITECT PLANS
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRY. SDRSDG-14D, YtW1H fi
PROPOSED FENCE+- GA1F

PROPOSEDUGHTWELLS
$TORM V,'A TER SUMP PUV? BY Pi..UMB!NG CONSUL TANT, PER Pi.J.!-J a~ ACO TRENCH DRA//1, OR EC4JIVALENT

PROPOSED ARCHJTECTURAL I STRUCTURAL SITE WALL

PROPOSED ROOP LIMITS
PROPOSED DECORATiVE RIP RAP RJ\IERBED, SIZING PER SDRSD D-40

PROPOSED BBQ SPACE FER W,'DSCAPE ARCHITECT PLANS

PROPQSED BASEMEIIT WALL UM/TS
AAOPOSE!'J Rt:/P.'l!NG Wt!.L. SDRSD C-4, 1-1=3.5' U~
PROPOSED RETAINING WAU SDRSO C-9, H::2' 1-"'X
PRJ?OSEO STOOJ.f.VATf.~ 0£TE,','Tf0N T.-'..'.'K
3 t1 HEIGHT(233 CF, M/.'i!\ft/M)
FG5'3.5(A~OX. t'~-OVCTft.l-lKJ
IE 5E.5 (AF'iP.OX L'iTERNAL !£ OF i"f-JW<}
PREP,\RED SY,

PASCO LARET SUITER
20 30
& ~SS~C!,..TES
San IJle&o I Encinitas I Oranp County
Phone 858.259.8212 I w;,w.l)lsaen&ineerifl,l.com
DRAWING NO.

Cf I
PLSA 3857
REV
I STORAGE VOLUME: 360 cf I
7'-0" 6'-0"
INLET, 04" PIPE.------._
IE: 62.30'.

INLET, 04" PIPE.

IE: 61.70'.
r ~,· 12'-0"----------
r--3'-6''
INLET, 04" PIPE.~
IE: 62.30'. "'

PLAN VIEW
6"TYP

WALL THICKNESS
TOP SLAB NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.

ACCESS COVERS SHOWN IN PHANTOM.
& I LOWERED INLET IE TO FIT PIPE WITHIN VAUL r. I
030" BOLTED & GASKETED ACCESS COVER. \

FIELD GROUT AS NEEDED TO MEET GRADE,
BY OTHERS. 1X 030"x6" GRADE RING.
5 1/4" ADJUST TO GRADE
RIM: 64.40' -.------.--------.-----------------------~~~~i~~~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=:------------ RIM: 64.40'

2.70'
[32.40"]

2.10'
[25.25"] 9 1/4"
I IE: 62.30' --'---r-----------:;;;:::;:;;;::;;:J;;fi
IE: 61.70' ~i ---------- 6.70'
[80.40"]
IE: 57.70' ~-------------

DESCRIPTION
5'-0"
I
6"
t
BY
INLET, 04" PIPE
INLET 0~" PIPE _/
OUTLET, 06" PIPE~
DATE

2.10'
[25.25'1
IE:62.30'&
10"TOP SLAB
3/4" JOINT
INLET, 04" PIPE

ELEVATION VIEW
DESIGN LOADINGS:

A AASHTO HS-20-44 WI IMPACT.

B. DESIGN F Ill: 1' MAXIMUM
C. ASSUMED WATER TABLE~ BELOW INVERT.

D. ORY LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE (EFP) = 45
PCF.

E. LATERAL LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE = 80 PSF
(APPLIED TO 8' BELOW GRADE).

F. NO LATERAL SURCHARGE FROM ADJACENT

BUILDINGS, WALLS, PIERS, OR
FOUNDATIONS.

2. CONCRETE 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
SHALL BE 5,000 PSI MINIMUM.

STEEL REINFORCEMENT: REBA.R, ASTM A-615 OR
A-706, GRADE 60.

4. CEMENT. ASTM C-150 SPECIFICATION.

5. REQUIRED NATIVE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING
PRESSURE~ 2,500 PSF.
6 REFERENCE STAl<DARD:

A ASTMC890
B. ASTM C 913

THIS STRUCTURE IS DESIGNED TO THE
PARAMETERS NOTED HEREIN. PLEASE VERIFY

THAT THESE PARAMETERS MEET PROJECT
REQUIREMENTS (LE. LIVE LOAD, FILL RANGE,
WATER TABLE). IF DESIGN PARAMETERS ARE

INCORRECT, REVIEWING ENGINEER/AUTHORITY

SHALL NOTIFY OLDCASTLE INFRASTRUCTURE
UPON REVIEW OF THIS SUB MITT AL.
8 OVERSIZED HOLES TO ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC
PIPE TYPE MUST BE CONCENTRIC TO PIPE ID.

AFTER PIPES ARE INSTALLED, ALL ANNULAR

SPACES SHALL BE FILLED WITH A MINIMUM OF
3000 PSI CONCRETE FOR FULL THICKNESS OF
PRECAST WALLS. PIPES ARE TO BE FLUSH WITH

THE INSIDE SURFACE OF THE CONCRETE
STRUCTURE.

9. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL
SIZES. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF
OPENINGS.

10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE
ADEQUATE BEARING SURFACE IS PROVIDED (I.E.

COMPACTED AND LEVEL PER PROJECT
SPECIFICATIONS).

11. SECTION HEIGHTS, SLAB/WALL THICKNESSES

AND KEYWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE

TO AVAILABILITY AND PRODUCTION PLANT
CAPABILITY.

12. MAXIMUM PICK WEIGHT: TBD.
- PRELIMINARY -

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 Oldcastle lnfrast~~!~!!(
Ph: GOO 57&.6619 VNIW 01ocastlem!rastructure comlstormwater THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF OLDCASTLE lt'tFRASTRUCTURE. INC IT IS CONrlDEJ\i~1AL, s.,,SMITTED FOR REF:'REt,::::e PUR.::iost:: ONl ', AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY INJURIOUS ro THE INTEFI.E$TS OF. OR WJTJ-!OUT TS-tE W~ITTEN PERMISSION OF OLOCASTLE 1NFRAS7RUCTURE, ]NC C0;;1'RIGH- '.~20:27 OL.:OC:!,STLE 1rlFRt,SIRUCiuRE, 11;~_ ALL rtlGWS RESL~VE'D C~STOMEc
Detention Vault
6'x12'
Pasco Laret Suiter & Associates - Encinitas JOB NAME
Helix-Bowers Residence - Solana Beach, CA SALES ORDER

APPLICANTS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREM ENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED IN THE CITY'S WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS. I HAVE

PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS AND THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN MANUAL. I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EF ICIENT USE OF WATER.

DOG RUN ENVIROTILE OR SIMILAR
/
/
--+-
(
I
HYDROZONE PLAN HYDROZONE LEGEND:
~ 1 LOW WATER USE - 958 SF
D 2WATERFEATURE-98SF
b-=-=-J 3 MODERATEWATER USE -159 SF
[:::::::: :1 4 LOW GREEN ROOF -655 SF
m 5 MODERATE TREE - 56 SF
~ 6 SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA - 42 SF

ROOF LEVEL HYDROZONE PLAN
I
~
~
~,L ; EXISTING TREE; TYP

VEHICULAR GATE

CONCEPT
PLAN

COMBINATION WALL
AREA USE CALCULATIONS:

AREA OF Vl()RK:

DECORATIVE HARDSCAPE

IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE

WATER FEATURES
117 SF
1,926 SF
98SF
AGG REGATE LANDSCAPE AREA 2141 SF
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE fETWU ) WORKSHEET Hydro-zone Numoer (1 - 5 ~ - use 35 many tablH as
ncccssarv lo complete 111! hydrozoncis)
I Evapotranspcra!Jon Raio (ETo)
See •A" below
Conversion FKtar - .62 t- -
2 Us.e A 1 (west of 1-5) / 47 {eost of 1-5)
062
(Line 1 xllne2)
PLir.nt Factor (PFf
sce·e·bebw

25.-42 ('#Ht of 1-5) /29 14 (east oU.5)
• ' 0.3
Hy<lrozone- Area (HA). m squ:uc reer
(Lllle4 x Ltne5)
s ' 958
287.4
lmgailOn Efficiency /IE)
See "C"beklw
(Lne 6 • Line 7J
u "
354 8
TOTAL of ::i n Unc 8 boxH • SlA
Line3)(l1ne9
Estlmatl!d Total W::ilet Use - ETWU
(Qilnons per year) 1D
Total shal no! exceed MAWA below
A
L1• •t""""""'~'°''•--- • 4 1 , .. Olor 1. ( )
47(a.iofl-51
n I'# · l"ll•hrvr ll<'"IIIC'l.11.S,Wr,n,r _...,,_...,-,,_.,,-w,,,, . .,.,t_ n,,.-.,.11~- . ... ~, ........ ,n ... ,w.
--•-r/ ,,......,M•••·._._..
o,f 17 11 .1..-.,,..11..,,,l,..,.,,,.,,
1•J•LII L"•"•""'t,,r: ... , "" V ll ,lt _.11....,.1.,.1'>•1• l!I /Ill II, ll4h/.,.I"'-•
10 06
,. 159
98 95 ◄

1.0 75
,. 127.2
.. ,.
22,()49
vr......,. ·• """ .< 11, .... .,.,.
03 655
1965
81 242.6
06 56
336
75 ......

MAXIMU)1 A PP LIED WATER APPLI CATIOX ()·I AWAr)_ca_l_ru_l_or_io_n_: ___ ---, .55 I ~IA"A 25.4:? [CET,\Fx 1926 \ • { 1-ETArx 42 )J .!fA07 ~ 1-4 l ou,.I L11nd,4;1r,.'Aria l~ A--
SLA
,,
I
TREES
0~
SHRUBS
w:-
(6
ff,::
®
0 Ll
e
G
~·
@
®
...
0 @
G
(iv
0 GROUND COVERS
-
D
QTY
QTY
11 21
69 11
26 15
38 21
11 14
QTY
22sf
655 sl

ACID ETCH CONCRETE

DRIVEWAY
\

BOTANICAL NAME
Bauh1ma x blakoam:i,
Citrus x sinonsis • Dw311 Valencia

BOTANICAL NAME
Agallt!- x • Blue Glow
Aloestriata
Aloe x Grassy Lassie
Ca,ox Iumu~cola
Ce:mothus x 'Centenrnal'
OrsllCllSX Rivers
Hesperaloe p:vvlflora • Brakelights
Leucadendron x Safon SunseL
Lomandra longlo~;i "Breeze·
Laurus nobi~s 'MonR1k'
Lavandula stoechas Otto Quast
Mouhlenb1Ng1a ngens
TM
Pittosporum tenuifo~um ·s1tver Sheen
Rosmarmus offiana~s • Lockwood de Forest
Sansev,en:i zeyl:i111c.i
Thymus vulgans
Westnngia fruticosa Morrnng Light

BOTANICAL NAME
Oymond1a m.irg3fetae
Dud!eya eduhs
Bout.elou::i grac1~s
Festuca ci\hforn1ca
Ach1llea mIllelo~um
NEW ALUMINUM PANEL FENCE 6'
SOLID WITH 2' EXTENSION 50% OPEN
LIGHT\iVEl l PER

ARCHITECTURE PLANS

COMMON NAME
Hong Kong Orchid Tree
Dwarf Valencia Orange

COMMON NAME
Blue Glow Agave
Coral Aloe
Aloe
Foothill Sedge
Centonnlal Wild lilnc
Royal Trumpt!I. Vine
Br:lkehghts Red Yucc:l
Red Conebush
Mal Rush
Little Ragu Sweet Bay
Spanisti lavende4'
Deer Grass
Silver Sheen T awhlv.tu
Dw:irf Rosemary
Mother-m-law Tongue
Common Thyme

CONTAINER
" BOX
BOX

CONTAINER
SGAL
5 GAL
SGAL
1 GAL
SGAL
SGAL
SGAL
SGAL
5 GAL
SGAL
1 GAL
SGAL
24"box
SGAL
SGAL
1 gal.

Mornmg Light Co:"lst Rosem:"lf)' SGAL

COMMON NAME CONTAINER SIZE
Oymond1a FLATS OJ 12"
S:in Diego Oudtey:"I 1 GAL 12·0.c.

Blue Gr:"lm:"I Grass 1 GAL 12"o.c.

Caltlor111a Fescue lGAL 12"oc.

Yanow lGAL 12"o.c.

HEIGHT
30'
12·

PITTOSPORUM

SCREEN SHRUBS
FENCE 6' SOLID WITH 2'
EXTENSION 80% OPEN

BOARD FORM

CONCRETE WALL WITH

OPEN FENCING ATOP

SEE SECTION LEFT

LARGE FORMAT

CONCRETE

PAVERS AT ENTRY
WUCOLS
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
WUCOLS
6' FLOWER SPIKE LOW

1.5' LOW
1· LOW
1· LOW
,. LOW

EQUAL TO WALL MEDIUM

OR FENCE HEIGHT
s· LOW
10· LOW
,. LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
,. LOW
12·.2s· MEDIUM
LOW
,. LOW
1· LOW
LOW
.. LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NOTES:

1. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE AND CONFIRM ALL UTILITIES

PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION - NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

OF ANY DESIGN CONFLICTS

2. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN FOR GRADING AND DRAINAGE

INFORMATION

3. HAND DIGGING IS REQUIRED AROUND ALL TR EES TO
REMAIN.

PLANTING NOTES:

1. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A 3"
LAYER OF DECORATIVE ROCK OR 3" LAYER OF BARK
MULCH UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON PLAN.

2. ALL SUCCULENTS REQUIRE CACTUS MIX OR OTHER
APPROVED SOIL TYPE TO BE PLACED MIN. 12" AROUND
THE BASE OF EACH PLANT.

3. ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 5' OF HARDSCAPE MUST

BE INSTALLED WITH A ROOT BARRIER ALONG THE
HARDSCAPE EDGE SPANNING OUT 5' IN EACH DIRECTION

FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE FOR A TOTAL LENGTH
OF 10'

4. REFER TO HYDROZONE PLAN FOR IRRIGATION
RECOMMENDATIONS.

5. ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL CONFORM TO

THE STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY-WIDE LANDSCAPE

REGULATIONS AND THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH

LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE

LANDSCAPE RELATED COUNTY AND REGIONAL
STANDARDS.

6. CONTRACTOR TO SETUP A PRE-CONSTRUCTION

WALKTHROUGH TO TAG ANY EXISTING PLANTS TO
REMAIN AND EXISTING PLANTS TO BE DEMOLISHED.

7. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT NEW TREE

LOCATIONS ARE SPOTTED PER LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT'S SITE DIRECTION. TREE INSTALLATION

SHALL ALSO INCLUDE COORDINATION OF DELIVERY AND

PROTECTION OF TREES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION,

KNOWLEDGE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PROPER
DRAINAGE, AND STAKING PER STANDARD DETAIL.

8. ALL HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN

HAVE BEEN DRAWN WITH AN ARTISTIC
CONCEPTUALIZATION. SOME ELEMENTS MAY BE

REFINED OR SIMPLIFIED IN SUBSEQUENT DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT STAGES FOR REASONS OF FEASIBILITY
OR FURTHER STAKEHOLDER INPUT.

9. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SHALL MAINTAIN REQUIRED

CLEARANCES FROM MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND

UTILITY APPURTENANCES, WIHILE SCREENING THEM
FROM VIEW.

10. REINFORCED STRAW MATTING TO BE INSTALLED IN

ALL AREAS THAT ARE GRADED OR OTHERWISE

DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION
• • 0 =· 11---- I SCALE 118'=1'-0"
w
_J
IIIw
w
:r:
en
1-
z
w
_J
u
1-
u
w
--,
0 0:::
a...
w
u
z
w
0 Cf)
w
0:::
><
_J
w
I
z
z
<(
....J

0..

I0..
w
u
z
0 u

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
revisions
dlawngpreparedby- COLA
shettplotdate• 06-24-23
carson clouglu JOb nuntier - 22-00<
design st.rt date• MARCH 2022
L-1
SHEET 1 OF 1

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
635 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101 • SOLANA BEACH• CALIFORNIA 92075 • (858) 720-2400 • FAX (858) 755-1782

STORY POLE HEIGHT CERTIFICATION
Assessor's Parcel No.:

Site Address: ZU3 N H€LIX Av£.

Owner's Name:

This is to certify that on AVG.Ck/ 9, zoz.3 the story poles located on the abo\le referenced site were surveyed by the undersigned, and found to be in conformance with the attached story pole plot plan. In addition, the following measurements were found:

Highest point of the story poles:
f
.....,. 8 ...... 3..... :x) ~-(M.S.L.)* tt;p#Lf
Pre-existing grade: /oQ,{pQ' (M.S.L.)*
Finished grade elevation: ~Co ...... (___ , _] _' _ (M.S.L.)* Finished floor elevation: _____ (M.S.L.)*
TOT AL MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Z~.90 I
PLEASE NOTE: The story poles must show and include the total height must include roofing materials. At framing inspection, a Height Certification will be required which must be in exact conformance with the maximum height shown on Story Pole Height Certifi~tion.

For additional information, please contact me at 7&o- 224 • 7&5:, (phon,8')11[:t~nai;.t-:-=:-..,.__ ~ -fly~
January 2019 Page 21 of 25
. -
. ·.
/.J..J
~+~ s
NTS
30 1
29 3
34 15
12 BOWERS RESIDENCE
228 N. HELIX AVE
CSP 22 -1661 R
5 6
---16
~---~
~-------~ 14 13
18 17
2 8 "1f------------i'( 2 6 •
25 . . . .. . ~ . - . -. . -. .

AUGUST 6, _ 2023
C-STORY POLES, INC.

Chris Collins PLS 8591 Bowers Residence
POB 230972 Encinitas, CA 92023 228 North Helix Avenue
(760) 224-7653 [email protected] W.O. CSP 22-1661R 8/8/2023 CC, SM, RM Page 1 of 1
* "T" T-post, "B" Bucket, "R" Roof, "FS" Finished Surface SP# BASE ELEV PLAN ELEV C/F LENGTH DESCRIPTION *
1 60.80 74.17 F - 13.37
2 60.73 83.50 F - 22.77 UPR

60.73 74.17 F - 13.44 LWR
3 60.70 83.50 F - 22.80
4 60.60 83.50 F- 22.90
5 63.58 83.50 F- 19.92 UPR

63.58 74.17 F - 10.59 LWR
6 60.93 74.17 F- 13.24
7 71.38 81.81 F - 10.43 UPR

71.38 74.17 F - 2.79 LWR
8 71.38 81.81 F- 10.43
9 60.92 83.50 F- 22.58
10 61.14 83.50 F - 22.36 UPR

61.14 74.17 F - 13.03 LWR
11 62.70 76.17 F - 13.47
12 62.54 83.50 F - 20.96
13 62.84 76.17 F - 13.33
14 74.15 83.50 F- 9.35
15 74.13 81.81 F - 7.68
16 72.66 81.81 F - 9.15 UPR

72.66 74.17 F - 1.51 LWR
17 72.63 74.17 F - 1.54
18 72.78 74.17 F - 1.39
19 71.49 72.67 F - 1.18
20 63.60 74.17 F- 10.57
25 64.09 72.67 F - 8.58
26 71.09 72.67 F - 1.58
27 71.56 74.17 F - 2.61
28 63 .65 74.17 F - 10.52 UPR

63.65 72.67 F- 9.02 LWR
CSP 22-1661R 8/8/2023 Page 2 of 2
29 63.68 74
.17 F
- 10.49
30 62.57 74.17 F- 11.60
33 61.81 83.50 F- 21.69 UPR

61.81 76.17
F- 14
.36 LWR
34 61.69 83.50
F- 21.81

APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT
(Structure Development Permit)
DEC 2022
Project No.:.])f< fLZ -O /:5 / Sl)P 2? -O I/ ; JtAv' 2t_p3-52 I -2/ -00

1. Address of property for which the structure development permit has been requested:
22-B. rJ, -i-f-e /i Y Ike· . S6 C4 J J

2. Provide the following information for the individual filing this Application for Assessment:

Name: Addres;s:-:Jiiii11�""£..:'.;�4��4_:-=_J_u.J_:;__:�./2L-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=�

3. Description of the viewing area as defined in Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance, Section 17 .63 .020(1) and extent of impairment: __________________ _

4. Identify the portion of the proposed structure which is the most objectionable and suggestions to minimize the view impairment: ______________________

5. Description of the Claimants attempt(s) to resolve this issue with the owner/representative of the property for which a Structure Development Permit has been requested: ____________________________ _
12-- !/- 2t)2,2-
Date Submitted
STAFF USE ONLY:

Application for Assessment fee paid?
6-2019
12 -,-; JI 11..A /i ,;?_/,,·.,.-;
Phone Number: -Iii - Email:

Details per VAC Application Form [Appended herewith]
Project File: DRP22-013/ SDP22-0l 1
APN: 263-321-21-00
I) Project Address:
228 N Helix Ave, Solana Beach, CA 92075
2) V AC Applicant, Address & Contact info:

Jill (& Jeremy) Martin,~ Helix Ave, Solana Beach, CA 92075; 3) Viewing Area with Obstructed View:

Our single-story house has a primary viewing area within the living room and kitchen (open concept-style) from which a panorama of blue skies and palm trees, resembling a painted mural, is viewed looking out from our north-facing clerestory windows. At multiple timepoints throughout each year, we enjoy watching the returning families of nesting snowy egrets and yellow-crowned night herons from atop the very palm trees which are captured within this panoramic view. The next-door proposed structure at 228 N Helix would fully (100%) obstruct our view and replace the aesthetically pleasing sky and palm trees with an exterior wall of the structure. The loss of this view would also negatively impact the amount of natural light we experience day-to-day. I have attached multiple photos of the obstructed view from our north-facing clerestory windows and images of our 222 N Helix architectural plan (per our single-story remodel in 2018) which shows the floor plan of the primary viewing area and a north elevation showing our clerestory windows.
4) Proposed Offending Structure:

The portion of the proposed structure which is particularly objectionable is the 2nd story, at least the front-most portion thereof, positioned in direct alignment with our northfacing clerestory windows. This view obstruction can possibly be remedied by eliminating, minimizing, and/or offsetting the 2nd story in a manner which shifts the alignment of the 2nd story exterior wall away from our north-facing clerestory windows. 5) Description of Meetings with Owner/Representative of Project:

I met with the architect representing the buyers (prospective owners) on two occasions to discuss my objections to their proposed structure in so far as it pertained to our obstructed view as described above. [Note: The buyers are not yet owners. The buyers are in a long escrow and my understanding is that they have not yet closed escrow.] Our first meeting on Oct 20th, 2022, resulted in the architect/buyers adding several story poles for our discussion purposes. At our second meeting on Dec 5th, 2022, I was able to show the architect from inside our viewing area why the added discussion poles would not provide a resolution and would still result in a nearly 100% obstruction by the exterior wall of their proposed structure. While no resolution was reached at the conclusion of our 2nd meeting, the architect mentioned she would discuss some possible 2nd story design revisions with the buyers. I have not heard from the architect since our Dec 5th meeting.

JWqJ_ I~ m1iwl ~~- ·,r ~ . ~ h,yL-
(f),ck f't \/J ~....J w~ v--)\.,U rt'~kl + ~ \/'-- Q_ VI ~ -~rj¾~;\~-- -1-,{~ <'.t> _ "'· ~ ,,J "'· ,, r .r-£ ""'" I. 1 /'" "' Ov---wt' r1 W-- l • h P J..

OOUBl.E303l!
S,H\JNG
BEDROOM2
T-5112"
WATERHEATI --TANKi:£ssW!
il
t
~
PROPOSED COMPOSITION .~ SHINGLE ROOF
-
I
J B-c !;'. () ,._
ilil ·-5'-0"
!½a
I ~
i.EB.Qe.OSEI~ I 9 X3'X3' AC U IT "'

PROPOSED

SIDING (HARDIE
FIBER
SIDING
CEMENT
OR
~

APPROVED EQUAL)
-------
\
\
I

SLIDING GLASS
DOOR

DOOR AND SIDE LITES

TO REPLACE EXISTING
PROPOSED WINDO~ -==r _ _ __ - ·----..
1\ I
I I I
\__'MECH UNIT
11,_1, WOOD SCREEN PR~~N~~ ~EW FRAMING _ I/ PROPOSED __J ~ NEW FRAMING --------~------~-- PROPOSED ADDITION WINDOW
PROPOSED ~
PARAPET \

FRAMING

PROPOSED

FINISH GRADE
1 ~ EXISTING GRADE

NEW FRAMING
• 1

SLIDING GLASS
DOOR
16FT, HT LINE
FF. 6\

WINDOWNORTH ELEVATION &
SCALE 1/4"=1'-0'
Tiffany Wade
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Hi Corey,
Jill Martin
Sunday, December 11 , 2022 10:43 AM
Corey Andrews
Jill D. Martin
VAC application submission re: 228 N Helix Project (APN: 263-321-21-00) Jill Martin_VAC application form.pdf; Jill Martin_VAC application.pdf Many thanks for your time on the phone last Thursday regarding the VAC application submission process ... Your feedback was very helpful! I will follow up this emailed submission with an in-person submission package which will include the application fee.

Best regards,
Jill
VAC Applicant: Jill Martin
lllllltJ Helix Ave.

Solana Beach, CA 92075
1 7
I I
I MASTER c. - L _ _J r 7
24'X30' ATTIC ,-,,/-~ I
ACC!:SS L _ _J
(!l
I
~§
t-\l:i;
en ~ 2X6 S UDS @16'' O,C, W/
I / R•2D B TT INSULATION Wt
• 1121 G P FINISH ON

INTERI R SIDE (TIP,)
GROOM
e
oo BATH2
PAIR3:l7□
5-LITE FROSTED

CLOSET SLIDER
POWDER
0 CJ
2 ,,.. I
2670
SCWD

BARN STYLE
DOUBLE 3036
S.HUNG
t:!
.,..
,..._
_,
U"l
BEDROOM 2
T-5 112"
PAIR3:l70
s-t.lTE FROSTED

CLOSET SLIDER
L_.J
I
I
so12 \.1
SLIDER ABOVE\

PROPOSED COMPOSITION

SHNGLE ROOF
OSE[t
ACU!il!T

PROPOSED FIIJER CEMENT

SIDING (HARD E SIDING OR
APPl,OVED EQUAL)
• PROPOSED
WIN mv
·----11~~·-~
I

MECH UNIT
11,,J' WOODSCf!EEN
~¥---------------0 NEW FRAM NG

PROPOSEO AOM'ION
3 -1
Ii
I
I
SllD'.NG GV,SS
DOOR
PROPOSED w·Noo·.vs

PROPOSED
WINDOW
I 4'-
!
,,.,.

I
F
4 5
Tiffany Wade
From: Jill Martin
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 3:31 PM
To: Corey Andrews
Subject: Re: VAC application submission re: 228 N Helix Project (APN: 263-321-21-00) Hi Corey,
I wanted to supplement my file with the attached photos, if possible. The contractor who remodeled our house had done a photo shoot awhile ago and when I was looking through these photos the other day, I realized that their photographer captured the view through our north-facing clerestory windows in a manner consistent with my description of the view in my VAC application.

Many thanks,
Jill Martin
1 On Dec 11, 2022, at 10:42 AM, Jill Martin
2 Hi Corey,
Many thanks for your time on the phone last Thursday regarding the VAC application submission process ... Your feedback was very helpful! I will follow up this emailed submission with an in-person submission package which will include the application fee.

Best regards,
Jill
VAC Applicant: Jill Martin
• N Helix Ave.

Solana Beach, CA 92075
<Jill Martin_VAC application form.pdf>
<Jill Martin_ VAC application.pdf>
<Jill Martin_Primary View Area.png>
<Jill Martin_North facing clerestory windows.png>
<JillMartin_obstructed view.jpeg>
<JillMartin_obstructed view2.jpeg>
3 APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT
(Structure Development Permit)
Project No.: -f/f>N ~ 2_lp 3 - 3 21 - 2.. J - 00

1. Address of property for which the structure development permit has been requested:
22 ? 4 ---fe. I 'J2 tfv-e

2. Provide the following information for the individual filing this Application for Assessment:

Name: :I}· 1 I M a-r-b /1
~um -flli c•--~•-~
C C
~-
- .,.J,;0,,_
/~#)0~~,,
-- --

3. Description of the viewing area as defined in Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance, Section

17.63.020(I)andextentofimpairment: ______________ _

4. Identify the portion of the proposed structure which is the most objectionable and suggestions to mioimi:ze the view impairment:. ________________ _

5. Description of the Claimants attempt(s) to resolve this issue with the owner/representative of the property for which a Structure Development Permit has been requested: ______________________ _
_3-J~--2D~3
Date Submitted
STAFF USE ONLY:

Application for Assessment fee paid?
6-2019
Amended View Assessment Application & Application Form [Appended herewith] Project File: DRP22-013/ SDP22-011; APN: 263-321-21-00
1) Project Address: 228 N Helix Ave, Solana Beach, CA 92075 2) VAC Applicant, Address & Contact info:

Jill (& Jeremy) Martin
N Helix Ave, Solana Beach, CA 92075
3) Viewing Area with Obstructed View:

Our modest single-story house has a primary viewing area within the living room and kitchen (open concept-style) from which a panorama of blue skies and palm trees, resembling a painted mural, is viewed looking out from our north-facing clerestory windows. At multiple timepoints throughout each year, we enjoy watching the returning families of nesting snowy egrets and yellow-crowned night herons from atop the very palm trees captured within this panoramic view. Importantly, this view is enjoyed at varying angles depending upon where you are standing in the kitchen or in the living room and is our only aesthetically pleasing (and calming) unadulterated view of nature from inside our home. The next door proposed changes to the structure at 228 N Helix would obstruct this primary view and replace the aesthetically pleasing sky and palm trees with a sizeable portion of its exterior wall (see appended photo with shading). The loss of this view, even partially, would negatively impact the amount of natural light we experience day-to-day and ruin the aesthetic experience of viewing the sky and treetop mural. It is challenging to ascertain exactly which of the original story poles will remain as an obstruction. The shaded photo considers only new pole 23 but I believe other original or amended poles will still account for even more of an obstruction beyond that shown. Please also refer to the multiple photos provided in our original view assessment application showing the obstructed view from our north-facing clerestory windows and images of our 222 N Helix architectural plan (per our single-story remodel in 2018) which shows the floor plan of the primary viewing area and a north elevation showing our clerestory windows.
-
4) Proposed Offending Structure:

The portion of the proposed structure which is particularly objectionable is the overall height of the proposed structure and the front-most southwest portion of the 2nd floor, positioned in direct alignment with our north-facing clerestory windows. This view obstruction can possibly be remedied by eliminating, minimizing, and/or offsetting the 2 nd story in a manner which shifts the alignment of the 2nd story exterior wall away (in a northeast direction) from our north-facing clerestory windows. 5) Description of Meetings with Owner/Representative of Project:

The architect, on behalf of the investors/ developers, has claimed in recent email correspondence with neighbors that the proposed changes, which prompted the city’s second notification letter dated February 14, 2023, were in response to “ongoing coordination with neighbors.” Indeed, the city’s second notification letter states “[t]he Applicant has since revised the project to address neighborhood concerns.” These statements are not true in our instance, nor do I know of any neighbor for whom these statements would be true. My last meeting with the architect on December 14th of 2022 ended unprofessionally on her part. I have not heard a word from her since. One of the investors/ developers* subsequently met with me on February 8th, 2023. At this meeting, the investor/ developer apologized to me for the architect’s behavior, and I described to him why the proposed changes would not resolve my view issues. However, no further discussion with the investors/ developers has since transpired. So, it will be no surprise that we take issue with their characterization of the dynamic between us as “ongoing coordination” and “addressing neighborhood concerns.”

*The investors /developers are not the actual owners yet. My understanding is that they are in a contractual long escrow and will not close until and if they get this SDP/DRP.

APPLICA TIOl\ FOR \.IE\\' ASSESSMEl\T
Orr· - CL 1 2022
(Structure DeYelopment Permitf',J•~ ~.).U ..:i-60
Project ~o.:O p Itel.~ -of.lr'P~Jd.-Of\:A •
Pro\'ldeii1 ~ frll]O\\ ing iJ1forn1a~·o. the md1ndual tiling this :\pplicatwn for :\ssessment:
:\ame: e t1lj' '....--------cc=----'---A·-~ _____ ---·· ·--· __ ... ·- Addres. • _,,, • c Y" ~ a, . -- ---
Phone ~umhcr:

Email:

3. f)cscription t)f the \'iC\\·ing area a~ defined 111 Solana 8c~1ch Zoning ()rdinancc. Section I 7 .63 .()20( I) and extent nf impairment:
--1. !dent it\ the portion of the prnposed structure \\'hich is the most objectit1nahlc :md sugges1ions tu minimize the Yie,\ impairment:
.:; Description uf the ( ·1a1mants attempth) tu res,lh e tin~ issue with the owner represcntall\ e pf the prupert~ for \\'hicll :1 Struc1ure De, clPpment Permit h<1~ been rcqu~ ······-~ •
• ~c:.p f e.~d.ect •
t:pl1~ant i<'1 bcssmcnl L?i,,,:),,~ • J ~
Details per VAC Application Form
(Appended Herewith)

APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT
{Structure Development Permit)
Project No.DPR22-013/SDP22-011 :APN:263-321-21-00
1 )Project Address:
228 North Helix Ave. Solana Beach, Ca 92075
2) VAC Applicant, Address & Contact Info:

Naomi Clum
• North Sierra Ave, Solana Beach, CA 92075
3) Descriptoin of the viewing area as defined in Solana beach Zoning Ordinance, Section17.63.020(I) and extent of impairment: From my dining area the western view is blocked by the second story of the house. It also blocks that natural light coming in during the afternoon starting around 3 pm. The proposed second story and 12 inches above the normal building height would block the sunlight coming into my bedroom, kitchen and dining area. What is now a view of a tree line and blue skies along with the sun setting behind the bluff would be greatly impaired.n I have sat and watched this over several days. Additionally it appears as if the second story would also have windows that would give the second story a direct view into all of the above stated areas.
4 )Proposed Offending Structure/Suggestions for Remedy: The proposed second story at the North end of the property is the most offensive portion. It is above the normal acceptable height and is the area that blocks the view and light. This objectionable obstruction and height could be kept with the Solana Beach height limits and moved to the south eastern portion of the property, or the second story could be eliminated.
5)Description of Meetings with Owner/Representative of Project: I have been unable to personally meet due to my working hours.
.•• "..::;-~.• ;:.-~[~?.· ::..,.
·4•.:7~•,.~· . ~' ·;:~.1::~ >-.-~-~}~::;;.,-'::;·;

Amended View Assessment Application & Application Form [Appended herewith]

APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT
(Structure Development Permit)
Project No.DPR22-013/SDP22-011:APN:263-321-21-00
1)Project Address;
228 North Helix Ave. Solana Beach, Ca 92075
2) VAC Applicant, Address & Contact Info:

Naomi Clum
North Sierra Ave, Solana Beach, CA 92075
3) Description of the viewing area as defined in Solana beach Zoning Ordinance, Section17.63.020(I) and extent of impairment: From my dining area the western view is blocked by the second story of the house. It also blocks that natural light coming in during the afternoon starting around 3 pm. The proposed second story and height above the normal building height would block the sunlight coming into my bedroom, kitchen and dining area. What is now a view of a tree line and blue skies along with the sun setting behind the bluff would be greatly impaired.The new story poles show that they have made the house even larger which blocks even more view since the width was greatly increased.This much bigger version will block out even more light, and the shade of this hugely oversized structure would block the light from some of my plants that I have been growing for 17 years, which is how long I have resided at this location The propose windows will look into my backyard, dining area, kitchen, bedroom and bathroom, thus taking away almost all of the privacy. Lights on the outside of the house will also have the great potential to shine directly and indirectly into 5 of 7 windows which accounts for more than half of my living space.
4)Proposed Offending Structure/Suggestions for Remedy: This objectionable obstruction and height and size should be kept within the Solana Beach building limits and not block views according to the guidelines. Lights should not be shining directly into my windows r placed for menial light pollution.This plan is for investors to make a huge profit at the expense of the residents that have lived here for so long. They have no concern about how it affects the neighbors around the proposed structure.
5)Description of Meetings with Owner/Representative of Project: I have been unable to personally meet due to my working hours. The communication has been severely lacking and has not addressed my concerns. In fact I have not been contacted at all about the story poles. I They have done the complete opposite of addressing concerns. Old poles have been left making it difficult to tell what the footprint really is. It’s almost antagonistic in nature how the investors have falsely claimed that they have addressed our concerns. Why would Solana -
beach let this be approved? Regulations and ordinances are put in place because that fits the community best. The house is not wanted due to the negative effects described above. It is outrageously over the building height and size! This should not be allowed at this location!

Naomi Camelia Clum

APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT
~011t> ~~~o\s
Project No.: ______ _
(Structure Development Permit)
-f\\\-"'~~

RECEIVED
DEC 12 2022
Community Development Dept.

Citv of ~olr1na Beach

1. Address of prope1ty for which the structure development permit has been requested:

2. Provide the following information for the individual filing this Application for Assessment:

Name: ------------------------------ Address: ------------------------------ Phone Number: --------------------------- Em a i I: ------------------------------

3. Description of the viewing area as defined m Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance, Section

17.63.020(1) and extent of impairment: ___________________ _

4. Identify the portion of the proposed structure which is the most objectionable and suggestions to minimize the view impairment: _____________________ _

5. Description of the Claimants attempt(s) to resolve this issue with the owner/representative of the property for which a Structure Development Permit has been requested: ------------------------------
pplicant for Assessment Date Submitted
STAFF USE ONLY:

Application for Assessment fee paid? ~
6-2019
APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT (Structure Development Permit) Project No.: DRP22-013/SDP22-0l l
APN: 263-321-21-00

1. Address of property for which the structure development permit has been requested:
228 N Helix Ave, Solana Beach, CA 92075

2. Provide the following information for the individual filing this Application for Assessment:

Anthony Gatti
N Helix Ave, Solana Beach, CA. 92075

3. Description of the viewing area as defined in Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.63.020(1) and extent of impairment:

Our two (2) story home was constructed in 2008 and purchased by our family in May 2021. Our home sits lower on the street due to the natural slope of the land and was specifically designed for the primary view to be the second floor landing at the top of the staircase connecting the first floor to the second floor, along with the master bedroom windows facing north directly in the primary view path of the proposed development.

One of the main architectural features of our hose that was empathized in the marketing of our house were the large windows and the unobstructed primary view to the north. The two (2) and only exterior walls at the top of the second floor landing are designed to include six( 6) feet of windows to provide natural light to flow through the house and to capture a picturesque primary view of the existing palm trees, hills of Solana Beach and natural nesting of birds in the trees.

The proposed structure would obstruct our existing primary view.

4. Identify the portion of the proposed structure which is the most objectionable and suggestions to minimize the view impairment:

The second (2nd) story height of the proposed structure and its set-back on the south side of the structure is the most objectionable.

If the proposed structure eliminated or minimized its 2nd story and/or shifted the layout of the proposed 2nd floor from the south side of the property line to the north side of the property line, this would preserve some of the existing primary view corridor at our house.

5. Description of the Claimants attempt(s) to resolve this issue with the owner/ representative of the property for which a Structure Development Permit has been requested:

We have had very minimal outreach/communication from the potential owners. It is our understanding a partnership of individuals have entered into a long escrow of over 1-year with a business plan to develop a spec home to be sold as an investment.

The partnership/owners have designated their architect as the main contact for communication. The owners/architect held one neighborhood outside meeting. At this meeting, we invited the architect into our home to view, first hand, our primary view from our 2nd floor landing. We stated our position that our primary view would be significantly compromised by the proposed structure.

We have responded in a timely fashion to the architect's emails. In our opinion, there have been very minimal proposed changes from the owners/architect. Their main theme of communication has been to dismiss our concerns that our 2nd floor landing is our primary view.

Signature of Applicant for Assessment
Date Submitted / ~- I ~ - ~ ~
STAFF USE ONLY:

Application for Assessment fee paid? _____ _
6-2019
AMENDED (3/16/23) APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSMENT (Structure Development Permit)
Project No.: DRP22-013/SDP22-0l l
APN: 263-321-21-00

1. Address of property for which the structure development permit has been requested:
228 N Helix Ave, Solana Beach, CA 92075

2. Provide the following information for the individual filing this Application for Assessment:

Anthony Gatti
N Helix Ave, Solana Beach, CA. 92075

3. Description of the viewing area as defined in Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.63.020(1) and extent ofimpainnent:

Our two (2) story home was constructed in 2008 and purchased by our family in May 2021. Our home sits lower on the street due to the natural slope of the land and was specifically designed for the primary view to be the second floor landing at the top of the staircase connecting the first floor to the second floor, along with the master bedroom windows facing north directly in the primary view path of the proposed development.

One of the main architectural features of our house that was empathized in the marketing of our house were the large windows and the unobstructed primary view to the north. The two (2) and only exterior walls at the top of the second floor landing are designed to include six( 6) feet of windows to provide natural light to flow through the house and to capture a picturesque primary view of the existing palm trees, hills of Solana Beach and natural nesting of birds in the trees.

The proposed structure would obstruct our existing primary view.

Unfortunately, the amended story poles did not provide a solution for blocking our view and light into our home. I have included photos that show how the proposed structure completely blocks our view and natural light.

AMENDED (3/ 16/23) APPLICATION FOR VIEW ASSESSM8'ff

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
View Assessment Commission Action Minutes
Tuesday, April 18, 2023 - 6:00 P.M. Regular Mtg.

City Hall/Council Chambers
635 South Highway 101, Solana Beach, CA 92075
Minutes contain a summary of the discussions and actions taken by the View Assessment Commission during a meeting are video recorded and archived as a permanent record.

The video recording captures the complete proceedings of the meeting and is available for viewing on the City's website.

1. CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL
Chairperson Cohen called the View Assessment Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 PM on Tuesday, April 18, 2023, in the Council Chambers at 635 South Highway 101, Solana Beach.

Present: VAC Members: Matthew Cohen, Robert Moldenhauer, Linda Najjar, Frank Stribling, Rich Villasenor, and Robert Zajac
Staff Members: Joseph Lim, Community Development Director; Tiffany Wade, Associate Planner; John Delmer, Assistant
Planner; and Tim Campen, Deputy City Attorney.

Absent: Pat Coad

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Speaker time limit: 3 minutes)
There were no speakers.

3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chairperson Cohen called for a motion to approve the agenda. Motion made by Commissioner Zajac, seconded by Commissioner Moldenhauer, which passed 6/0/1 (Absent: Coad)

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. February 21, 2023
Chairperson Cohen called for a motion to approve the February 21, 2023, Minutes. Motion made by Commissioner Moldenhauer to approve the minutes, seconded by Commissioner Najjar, which passed 6/0/1 (Absent: Coad)

5. Staff Comments / Discussion (10 minutes total)
There were no Staff Comments.

Note: Speaker time limits:
• Applicant, including representatives: total of 15 minutes • Claimant, including representatives: total of 15 minutes • Public speakers: 3 minutes each
(may be reduced based on number of speakers, not to exceed 20 minutes total) • Applicant, response to any new info: total of 5 minutes VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 18, 2023

Chairperson Cohen read the Chairperson preamble.

6. DRP22-013/SDP22-011 Bowers Residence – 228 N Helix Ave., Solana Beach Applicant Information:

Name: Ryan Bowers
Phone:

Email:

Architect:

Name: Jennifer Bolyn, EOS Architecture
Phone: (858) 459-0575
Email: [email protected]
Claimant Information:

Name: Jill Martin
Address: N. Helix Ave.

Phone:

Email:

Name: Naomi Clum
Address: N. Sierra Ave.

Phone:

Email:

Name: Anthony Gatti
Address: N. Helix Ave.

Phone:

Email:

Project Description:

The Applicant is requesting the approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SDP) for a new two-story single-family residence with a basement and attached two-car garage. The 4,491 square-foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The following is a breakdown of the new proposed floor area:

Proposed Basement
Proposed First Floor
Proposed Second Floor
Covered and Enclosed Exterior Area
Proposed Garage
1,593 SF
1,111 SF
1,025 SF
40 SF
454 SF
Subtotal 4,223 SF
Basement Exemption
Required Parking Exemption
- 1,593 SF
- 400 SF
Total Floor Area Proposed 2,230 SF
VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 18, 2023

Maximum Allowable Floor Area (SROZ) 2,246 SF
The project would include grading in the amount of 1,060 CY aggregate. The tallest point of new construction is proposed at 24.55 feet above the proposed grade with a pole height of 85.33 MSL, the highest point of new construction has a pole height of 86.33 MSL. The project requires a DRP for three reasons: 1) a structure that exceeds 60% of the maximum allowable floor area; 2) a new second story that exceeds 35% of the first-floor area, and; 3) aggregate grading that exceeds 100 CY.

Chairperson Cohen opened the public hearing, and the Commissioners stated their disclosures (as shown on table below) regarding dates they visited the properties.

Chairperson Cohen asked staff for clarification on the story poles currently on site, Staff clarified that the proposal currently under review is represented by the story poles with orange and green flags. The story poles with the pink and blue flags represent a previous design.

Tiffany Wade, Associate Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation describing the project. A copy of the PowerPoint will be included in the project file.

Ryan Bowers, Applicant, and Jennifer Bolyn, Architect, gave a PowerPoint presentation describing the intent of the proposed design. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be included in the project file.

Jill Martin (222 N Helix Ave.), Claimant, presented a PowerPoint presentation describing her concerns of view obstruction resulting from the proposed project. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be included in the file.

Naomi Clum (219 N Sierra Ave.), Claimant, presented a PowerPoint presentation describing her concerns of view obstruction resulting from the proposed project. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be included in the file.

Anthony Gatti (218 N Helix Ave), Claimant, presented a PowerPoint presentation describing his concerns of view obstruction resulting from the proposed project. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be included in the file.

Chair Cohen noted that the VAC members received a written public comment from the property owners of 211 N Sierra.

Kale Major (217 N Sierra), provided a public comment on agenda item #6 and stated that he believes the proposed project is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood.

Ms. Bolyn responded to the items that were brought up by the Claimants and public speaker.

The Commissioners had questions for Ms. Bolyn, she addressed all questions.

VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 18, 2023

Chairperson Cohen closed the public hearing, and the commissioners made their findings as shown in the tables below.

Jill Martin N Helix
Ave Coad Villasenor Cohen Moldenhauer Stribling Zajac Najjar Date
Visited
Claimant 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/14
Applicant 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/14
Primary
Viewing Area
Living Room /
Kitchen
Living
Room /
Kitchen
Living Room
/ Kitchen
Primary
Bedroom
Living
Room /
Kitchen
Kitchen
#1. Communication
Taken Place Y Y Y Y Y Y
#2. No Public View
Impairment Y Y Y Y Y Y
#3. Designed to
Minimize View
Impairment

N N N Y N N
#4. No Cumulative
View Impairment N N N Y N N
#5. Neighborhood
Compatibility Y N N N Y Y
Naomi Clum N
Sierra Coad Villasenor Cohen Moldenhauer Stribling Zajac Najjar Date
Visited
Claimant 4/14 4/17 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/14
Applicant 4/14 4/17 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/14
Primary
Viewing Area
Living Room /
Dining Room
Kitchen /
Sitting Area
Living Room
/ Dining
Room
Primary
Bedroom
Living
Room /
Dining
Room
Kitchen
#1. Communication
Taken Place Y Y Y Y Y Y
#2. No Public View
Impairment Y Y Y Y Y Y
#3. Designed to
Minimize View
Impairment

Y Y Y Y Y Y
#4. No Cumulative
View Impairment Y N Y Y N Y
#5. Neighborhood
Compatibility Y N Y N Y Y
VAC Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 18, 2023

Anthony Gatti N
Helix Ave Coad Villasenor Cohen Moldenhauer Stribling Zajac Najjar Date
Visited
Claimant 4/14 4/18 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/14
Applicant 4/14 4/18 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/14
Primary
Viewing Area
Primary
Bedroom
Primary
Bedroom
Primary
Bedroom
Primary
Bedroom
2nd Level
Deck
Primary
Bedroom
#1. Communication
Taken Place Y Y Y Y Y Y
#2. No Public View
Impairment Y Y Y Y Y Y
#3. Designed to
Minimize View
Impairment

N N N N Y N
#4. No Cumulative
View Impairment N N N Y N N
#5. Neighborhood
Compatibility Y N N N Y Y
Chairperson Cohen opened the public hearing and made a motion to recommend denial of the project to the City Council, seconded by Zajac, which passed 6/0/1. (Absent: Coad)

7. VAC Member Comments / Discussion (10 minutes total)
Chairperson Cohen welcomed Deputy City Attorney Tim Campen to the View Assessment Commission.

8. ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Cohen adjourned the meeting at 8:27 PM.

Minutes as approved by V.A.C. on _____________.

Respectfully submitted,
_______________________________
John Delmer, Assistant Planner
________________________________
Joseph Lim, Community Development Director
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH www.cityofsolanabeach.org
635 S OUTH HIGHWAY 101 • SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 • (858) 720-2400 • Fax (858) 720-2455

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
View Assessment Commission Notice of Recommendation
Tuesday, April 18, 2023 - 6:00 P.M. Regular Mtg.

PROJECT CASE NO:

PROJECT LOCATION:

APPLICANT NAME:

APPLICANT CONT ACT:

DRP22-013/SDP22-011 Bowers Residence
228 N Helix Ave, Solana Beach
Ryan Bowers
Jennifer Bolyn, EOS Architecture
PRESENT VAC MEMBERS: Matt Cohen, Robert Moldenhauer, Frank Stribling, Linda Najjar, Rich Villasenor and Robert Zajac
STAFF MEMBERS:

ABSENT:

ASSESSMENT FILED BY:

1. Name: Jill Martin
Joseph Lim, Community Development Director; Tim
Campen, Assistant City Attorney; Tiffany Wade, Assistant Planner; John Delmer, Junior Planner
Pat Coad
Address: - N. Helix Ave.

2. Name: Naomi Clum
Address: - N. Sierra Ave.

3. Name: Anthony Gatti
Address: - N. Helix Ave.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The Applicant is requesting the approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) and Structure Development Permit (SOP) for a new two-story single-family residence with a basement and attached two-car garage. The 4,491 square-foot lot is located within the Medium Residential (MR) Zone and the Scaled Residential Overlay Zone (SROZ). The following is a breakdown of the new proposed floor area:

Proposed Basement
Proposed First Floor
Proposed Second Floor
Covered and Enclosed Exterior Area
Proposed Garage
Subtotal
Basement Exemption
Required Parking Exemption
Total Floor Area Proposed
Maximum Allowable Floor Area (SROZ)
1,593SF
1,111 SF
1,025 SF
40SF
454SF
4,223 SF
-1,593 SF
-400 SF
2,230 SF
2,246 SF

VAC NOR
April 18, 2023

The project would include grading in the amount of 1,060 CY aggregate. The tallest point of new construction is proposed at 24.55 feet above the proposed grade with a pole height of 85.33 MSL, the highest point of new construction has a pole height of 86.33 MSL. The project requires a DRP for three reasons: 1) a structure that exceeds 60% of the maximum allowable floor area; 2) a new second story that exceeds 35% of the first-floor area, and; 3) aggregate grading that exceeds 100 CY.

VAC RECOMMENDATION:

The project was heard at the regularly scheduled, April 18, 2023, VAC meeting. After the Commissioners presented their findings Chair Cohen motioned to recommend denial of the project, seconded by Commissioner Zajac. Motion passed 6/0/1 (Absent: Coad) FINDINGS:

1. The Applicant for the Structure Development Permit has made a reasonable attempt to resolve the view impairment issues with the Claimants requesting view assessment.

Written evidence of a good faith voluntary effort to meet and discuss view issues, or of a good faith voluntary offer to submit the matter to mediation, is hereby deemed to be a reasonable attempt to resolve view impairment issues.

Claimant 1: Jill Marlin, 222 N Helix Ave.
,Yes - Written accounts and oral testimony at the public meeting showed that there had been communication between the Applicant and the Claimant.

Claimant 2: Naomi Clum, 219 N Sierra Ave.

Yes - Written accounts and oral testimony at the public meeting showed that there had been communication between the Applicant and the Claimant.

Claimant 3: Anthony Gatti, 218 N Helix Ave.

Yes - Written accounts and oral testimony at the public meeting showed that there had been communication between the Applicant and the Claimant.

2. The proposed structure does not significantly impair any view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bikeways, walkways, equestrian trails), which has been identified in the City's General Plan or City designated viewing areas.

Claimant 1: Jill Martin, - N Helix Ave.

VAC NOR
April 18, 2023

Yes - The subject property is not located within designated public viewing areas; therefore, the proposed structure does not significantly impair views from public property.

Claimant 2: Naomi Clum, . N Sierra Ave.

Yes - The subject property is not located within designated public viewing areas; therefore, the proposed structure does not significantly impair views from public property.

Claimant 3: Anthony Gatti, . N Helix Ave.

Yes - The subject property is not located within designated public viewing areas; therefore, the proposed structure does not significantly impair views from public property.

3. The proposed structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize impairment of views.

Claimant 1: Jill Martin, . N Helix Ave.

No - The majority (5 of 6) of the present VAC members found that the proposed residence was not designed or situated to minimize impairment of views.

Claimant 2: Naomi Clum,. N Sierra Ave.

Yes - The present VAC members unanimously found that the proposed residence was designed or situated to minimize impairment of views.

Claimant 3: Anthony Gatti, . N Helix Ave.

No - The majority (5 of 6) of the present VAC members found that the proposed residence was not designed or situated to minimize impairment of views.

4. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application as proposed.

Claimant 1: Jill Martin, . N Helix Ave.

No - The majority (5 of 6) of the present VAC members found that there would be significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application if adjacent lots were allowed to construct a development of a similar size and height.

Claimant 2: Naomi Clum, . N Sierra Ave.

Yes - The majority (4 of 6) of the present VAC members found that there would not be significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application if adjacent lots were allowed to construct a development of a similar size and height.

Claimant 3: Anthony Gatti, . N Helix Ave.

VAC NOR
April 18, 2023

No - The majority (5 of 6) of the present VAC members found that there would be significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the application if adjacent lots were allowed to c;onstruct a development of a similar size and height.

5. The proposed structure is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character.

Claimant 1: Jill Martin, . N Helix Ave.

Divided - The present VAC members were split (3 to 3) when voting on the compatibility of the proposed development with the immediate neighborhood character.

Claimant 2: Naomi Clum, . N Sierra Ave.

Yes - The majority (4 of 6) of the present VAC members found that the proposed development is compatible with the immediate neighborhood character. The development would be compatible with the existing neighboring structures in terms of design, bulk, scale, height and size.

Claimant 3: Anthony Gatti, . N Helix Ave.

Divided - The present VAC members were split (3 to 3) when voting on the compatibility of the proposed development with the immediate neighborhood character.

VAC Vote:

Chair Cohen motioned to recommend denial of the project, seconded by Commissioner Zajac.

Motion passed 6/0/1 (Absent: Coad)
Corey r w , rincipal Planner M hew Cohen, Chair
Staff~ aison, View Assessment Committee iew Assessment Committee

RECEIVED
JUN O 5 202 l
C ITV Of SO LANA BEACH Community Development Dep{ CITY OF SOLANA BEACH 635 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101 • SOLANA BEACH• CALIFORNIA 92075 • (858) 720-2400 • FAX (858) 755-1782

STORY POLE HEIGHT CERTIFICATION
Date: .:::.WNE I, 202.3
Assessor's Parcel No.: ZG,3-32/- ZI
Site Address: Z28 tJ HE.Lf X A\/f;
Owner's Name:

This is to certify that on J"0N£ /, ZO Z. 3 the story poles located on the above referenced site were surveyed by the undersigned, and found to be in conformance with the attached story pole plot plan. In addition, the following measurements were found:

Highest point of the story poles: Bl{.501 (M.S.L.)* 5p#q3 Pre-existing grade: G, (. 11 I (M.S.L.)*
Finished grade elevation: / _':) ·~' ~lP~::::> ~-~~~ - (M.S_L_)* Finished floor elevation: _____ (M.S.L.)*
TOTAL MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Z~.39
PLEASE NOTE: The story poles must show and include the total height must include roofing materials. At framing inspection, a Height Certification will be required which must be in exact conformance with the maximum height shown on Story Pole Height Certifi .

For additional information, please contact me at 7(RQr Z2lJ.r 7~:53 ( ~ 4£tt:~
Seal of Registration:
*Mean Sea Level (MSL) - all measurements must utilize an established benchmark at will not change over the course of the project. 7DP oF _ v,.IAL.L (E CoR o F \/\/ALL 'B""fv.JJJ ~(7e:
wrte.. M7R'S "_Tw"(R6f<n,po) ~LEV.== (p7.7_7'
January 2019 Page 21 of 25
lJ.J BOWERS RESIDENCE
228 N. HELIX AVE
(/) CSP 22-1661 R1
$ 20 21
NTS 32
42 34 48 49 44 50
40 35 41
30 36 39 46 45
22 23 47 51
29 28 27
25 26
o.p --ot. z:~
C-STORY POLES, INC.

Chris Collins PLS 8591 Bowers Residence
POB 230972 Encinitas, CA 92023 228 North Helix Avenue
(760) 224-7653 [email protected] W.O. CSP 22-1661RR 6/1/2023 CC, SM, RM Page 1 of 1
* "T" T-post, "B" Bucket, "R" Roof, "FS" Finished Surface SP# BASE ELEV PLAN ELEV C/F LENGTH DESCRIPTION *
20 60.68 83.50 F - 22.82 B
21 61.47 83.50 F - 22.03 T
22 72.80 74.17 F - 1.37 R
23 63.10 83.50 F - 20.40 UPR T

63.10 81.81 F- 18.71 LWR
24 62.86 76.17 F- 13.31 T
25 64.09 72.67 F - 8.58 T
26 71.09 72.67 F- 1.58 R
27 71.56 74.17 F - 2.61 UPR R

71.56 72.67 F- 1.11 LWR
28 63.65 74.17 F- 10.52 UPR T

63.65 72.67 F- 9.02 LWR
29 63.68 74.17 F- 10.49 T
30 62.57 74.17 F- 11.60 T
31 60.83 83.50 F - 22.67 UPR B

60.83 74.17 F - 13.34 LWR
32 60.79 83.50 F - 22.71 B
33 61.81 83.50 F - 21.69 UPR B

61.81 76.17 F - 14.36 LWR
34 61.72 83.50 F - 21.78 B
35 62.08 84.50 F - 22.42 UPR T

62.08 82.33 F - 20.25 LWR
36 63.05 82.33 F - 19.28 UPR T

63.05 76.17 F - 13.12 LWR
37 63.23 76.17 F- 12.94 T
38 63.49 81.81 F- 18.32 UPR T

63.49 76.17 F- 12.68 LWR
39 63.01 82.33 F- 19.32 T
40 62.33 83.50 F- 21.17 T
41 62.38 84.50 F- 22.12 T
., CSP 22-1661RR 6/1/2023 Page 2 of 2
42 64.61 84.50 F - 19.89 WOOD DECK
43 61.11 84.50 F - 23.39 B
44 72.52 79.50 F - 6.98 R
45 72.60 79.50 F- 6.90 R
46 74.84 79.50 F- 4.66 R
47 73.41 83.50 F- 10.09 UPR R

73.41 81.81 F- 8.40 LWR
48 73.49 83.50 F- 10.01 R
49 74.79 81.81 F- 7.02 R
50 72.38 83.50 F- 11.12 R
51 74.84 81.81 F- 6.97 R
Dear Members of City Council,
Thank you for granting the continuance for this project. We have made extensive design modifications based on the feedback of the City Council and the neighbors. The story poles reflect these changes. The proposed modifications reduced the envelope from that which was reviewed by City Council at the June 14th meeting, as follows:

Description of changes:
• Reduced the height of building by 1’-0” at master closet. • Reduced the second floor by 301 square feet, omitting east facing office. • Reduced second floor deck by 61 square feet.
• Reduced the second floor on the west side 7’-6” feet to the east in order to create a view corridor for the southerly neighbors.
• Note: The building was reduced an additional 1ft on the west side from the current location of story poles #12 and #14, in order to improve view access for southerly neighbors. • We omitted all non – privacy, second story windows from eastern and southern walls. The east facing windows are high clerestory for light and air only, there are no windows on the second floor southerly facing façade. • We added façade articulation and reduced the bulk and mass on the east facing wall. This was done by omitting the office and relocating the elevator. The length of the eastern most second floor wall was reduced by 16’-5 3/8” feet.
• We lowered the first-floor level and rear yard by 1.83 feet. • Note: The grade in the existing easterly easement area (five feet wide along the eastern property line) matches the existing grade and is being modified to improve drainage. • We have sent all plan revisions to all immediate neighbors, and we have conversations with all neighbors in order to address their concerns to the extent possible. • The first floor increased in size slightly (not beyond the previously poled envelope) to align with the second floor on the rear façade. This was done to reduce the stair projection to the west on the second floor and make the second-floor envelope reductions possible. The first floor was increased by 32 square feet. We are now 283 square feet (12.5%) below the allowable FAR for this lot. •
Please see attached diagrams that help explain these modifications. We have significantly reduced the bulk and scale of this project to integrate neighbor and City Council feedback and we now feel that the project is in concert with the bulk and scale of the neighborhood.

Thank you for your consideration and warmest regards.

Jennifer Bolyn, AIA Principal Architect
Attn: View Assessment Council Members
c/o Ms. Tiffany Wade
Associate Planner, Community Development Department
City of Solana Beach
635 South Highway 101
RE: DRP22-013/ SDP22-011
North Helix Residence
228 North Helix Avenue
Solana Beach, CA
September 13, 2023
eos
architecture inc.

NORTH HELIX AVE - PROPOSED DESIGN

NORTH HELIX AVE - PROPOSED DESIGN

NORTH HELIX AVE - PREVIOUS DESIGN

NORTH HELIX AVE - PROPOSED DESIGN

NORTH HELIX AVE - PREVIOUS DESIGN

NORTH HELIX AVE - PROPOSED DESIGN ENVELOPE REDUCTION - ROOF PLAN FRONT SETBACK 20'-0"

SIDE SETBACK
5'-0"

SIDE SETBACK
5'-0"
2'-0"
PROPO
(P) SECOND FLOOR SIDE SETBACK
5'-10 1/2"
(P) FIRST FLOOR SIDE SETBACK
5'-0"
(P) FIRST FLOOR SIDE SETBACK
5'-0 7/8"
(P) SECOND FLOOR SIDE SETBACK
5'-10 1/4"

PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR FRONT SETBACK
33'-8 3/8"

PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR FRONT SETBACK
20'-0" 1'-0"

SECOND STORY

BUILDING AREA
REMOVED (164 SF)

SECOND STORY

BUILDING AREA
REMOVED (55 SF)

SECOND STORY DECK
AREA REMOVED (61 SF)

SECOND STORY
LOWERED 1'-0"
ADDITIONAL 1FT SECOND STORY
BUILDING REDUCTION (19 SF)
1'-0"
6' -6 7/8"
7'-6"

SECOND STORY
LOWERED (1'-8 1/4")

SECOND STORY

BUILDING AREA
REMOVED (48 SF)
ADDITIONAL 1FT

COVERED DECK AREA

REMOVED
7' -6 7/8"
NOTE:

THE DESIGN PRESENTED AT 6/14 CITY
COUNCIL HEARING WAS 15 SQUARE FEET

SMALLER THAN THE DESIGN REVIEWED BY

PLANNING (SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM
STAFF REPORT IS 15 SF LARGER THAN THE
DESIGN PRESENTED ON 6/14)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I - I llrf;,=::=r"'F='"~ . =-
1 \ .•
1111111::::111111: 111 1111111 1:::11 l, 1111 m :1111111:: 11111111 1111 111111::::1111111im 1111111 1:::1111111:: 11 1111111 m :111111 1::: 1111111 1111 1111111 :::: 1111111 i111 1111111 1 --~ - 1--i--1 I
ii I I c------1-----
1 -----'------1..
- -- OD
11 11
I i ----1---,-- -----i-.:!-:

I
I
I
I
I
□
□
□
□
LJ
□

NORTH HELIX AVE - PROPOSED DESIGN ENVELOPE REDUCTION

SECOND STORY DECK
AREA REMOVED (61 SF)

SECOND STORY

BUILDING AREA
REMOVED (164 SF)
SECOND STORY LOWERED (1'-8 1/4")

SECOND STORY BUILDING AREA
REMOVED (48 SF)

SECOND STORY

BUILDING AREA
REMOVED (55 SF)

SECOND STORY
LOWERED (1'-0")
ADDITIONAL 1FT

COVERED DECK AREA

REMOVED
STORY POLE #12
STORY POLE #14
ADDITIONAL 1FT SECOND STORY
BUILDING REDUCTION (19 SF)

NORTH HELIX AVE - PROPOSED DESIGN ENVELOPE REDUCTION

SECOND STORY DECK
AREA REMOVED (61 SF)

SECOND STORY
LOWERED (1'-8 1/4")

SECOND STORY

BUILDING AREA
REMOVED (48 SF)
ADDITIONAL 1FT

COVERED DECK AREA

REMOVED

SECOND STORY

BUILDING AREA
REMOVED (164 SF)
ADDITIONAL 1FT SECOND

STORY BUILDING
REDUCTION (19 SF)
..............................

CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # B.2.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Request for a Development Review Permit to Conduct Grading in Excess of 100 Cubic Yards and
Perform Associated Site Improvements on a Lot with an
Existing Single-Story, Single-Family Residence at 667
Marine View Avenue, Solana Beach (Case # DRP21-013;
Applicant: Andrea Dominguez; APN: 298-390-35;
Resolution 2023-108)
BACKGROUND:

The Applicant, Andrea Dominguez, is requesting City Council (Council) approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) to conduct grading in excess of 100 cubic yards on a lot with an existing single-story, single-family residence. The 25,517 square-foot lot is located at 667 Marine View Avenue and is within both the Estate Residential (ER-2) Zone and Dark Sky Areas.

The Applicant proposes grading in the amounts of 200 cubic yards of cut and 570 cubic yards of fill. The total aggregate grading quantity would be 770 cubic yards. The project requires a DRP for aggregate grading in excess of 100 cubic yards.

The issue before the Council is whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Applicant’s request as contained in Resolution 2023-108 (Attachment 1).

DISCUSSION:

The subject property is located on the west side of Marine View Avenue just north of Highland Drive. The 25,517 square-foot lot fronts on Marine View Avenue to the east, with residential properties to the north, south, and west.

The topography of the project site slopes downward from the street. The highest elevation is at the southeast corner of the lot, along the front property line which is approximately 167 MSL. The rear property line is at approximately 146 MSL which results in a change September 27, 2023
DRP21-013 Dominguez
667 Marine View Ave

in elevation of approximately 21 feet. The lot is currently developed with a single-story, single-family residence with a driveway along Marine View Avenue near the southeast corner of the lot. There are three recorded easements on the lot, two public utility easements and one right-of-way and waterline easement along the east property line.

In June of 2020, a stop work notice was issued for unpermitted site grading. The Applicant stopped work and submitted this application for a DRP in August of 2021. Prior to the unpermitted site grading, the rear yard was undeveloped with landscaping and perimeter fences surrounding the lot. Most of the groundcover landscaping has been removed as a result of the site grading. The Applicant is requesting approval to conduct grading to level the site for a future building pad, construct a retaining wall to create a new driveway on the northeast corner of the lot, construct retaining walls to stabilize two concrete pads in the southwest portion of the lot, and perform associated site improvements. The project plans are provided in Attachment 2. If the Council is able to make the required findings and approve the project, a Condition of Approval has been added to the Resolution that would require the Applicant to pay double building permit fees for completing work without required permits.

Table 1 provides a comparison of the zoning regulations with the Applicant’s proposed design.

Table 1

LOT INFORMATION
Property Address:

Lot Size (Net):

Zone:

Overlay Zone(s):
667 Marine View Ave
25,517 ft2
ER-2 (1-2 du/ac)
Dark Sky Area
# of Units Allowed:
# of Units Existing:
1 Dwelling Unit, 1 ADU, 1 JADU
1 Dwelling Unit
Setbacks: Required
Front (W) 25 ft.

Interior Side (N) 10 ft.

Interior Side (S) 10 ft.

Rear (E) 40 ft.

As proposed, the project meets the required setbacks for the zone.

PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION
Required Permits:

DRP: A DRP is required for grading in excess of 100 cubic yards (aggregate) Proposed Grading: Cut: 200 cubic yards Fill: 570 cubic yards Import: 370 cubic yards Aggregate Grading Quantity: 770 cubic yards
Existing Parking: 0
Proposed Parking: 2 (located on driveway)
Proposed Fences and Walls: Yes
Existing Development:

Single-story, single-family residence.

September 27, 2023
DRP21-013 Dominguez
667 Marine View Ave

Development Review Permit Compliance (SBMC Section 17.68.40):

A DRP is required because the proposal includes an aggregate grading quantity that would exceed 100 cubic yards. In addition to meeting the zoning requirements, the project must also be found in compliance with development review criteria. The following is a list of the development review criteria topics:

1. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses

2. Building and Structure Placement

3. Landscaping

4. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking, and Storage Areas

5. Grading

6. Lighting

7. Usable Open Space
The following is a discussion of the findings for a DRP as each applies to the proposed project as well as reference to recommended conditions of approval contained in Resolution 2023-108 The Council may approve, or conditionally approve, a DRP only if all of the findings listed below can be made:

1. The proposed development is consistent with the general plan and all applicable requirements of this title, including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.

2. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria.

3. All required permits and approvals issued by the city, including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

4. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

If any of the above findings cannot be made, the Council shall deny the DRP.

In addition to meeting zoning requirements, the project must also be found in compliance with development review criteria. The following is a discussion of the applicable development review criteria as they relate to the proposed project.

Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses:

The subject site is located within the Estate Residential (ER-2) Zone. The surrounding neighborhood consists of a mix of properties that are one- and two-story, single-family September 27, 2023
DRP21-013 Dominguez
667 Marine View Ave

residences. The project site is currently developed with a 781 square-foot single-story, single-family residence. The Applicant proposes to level the existing grade to create a future building pad and construct retaining walls for a new driveway.

As designed, the project is consistent with the permitted uses for the ER-2 Zone as described in Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) Sections 17.20.010 and 17.12.020, which permits one single-family residence. The property is designated Estate Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residential development with a maximum density of four (0-2) dwelling units per acre. The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the Dark Sky Area. The project has been evaluated and the building permit plans would be conditioned to be in conformance with the regulations of the Dark Sky Area. The project is also located within the Coastal Zone. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant will be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver, or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of building or grading permits.

Building and Structure Placement:

The site is currently developed with a 781 square-foot, single-story residence. No changes to the existing residence are proposed.

The ER-2 Zone requires 25-foot front-yard setback, 10-foot side-yard setbacks, and a 40- foot rear-yard setback. The proposed project, as designed, meets the required setbacks.

Fences, Walls and Retaining Walls:

The Applicant proposes to construct new retaining walls within the front-yard, interior-side yard, and the buildable area. The proposed retaining walls within the front and side yard are a maximum of 3.5 feet above pre-existing grade. The retaining wall within the buildable area is a maximum of 5 feet above pre-existing grade. The portion of the existing

3.3-foot fence within the front yard and buildable area is proposed to remain. The portion of the existing 3.3-foot fence within the public right-of-way is proposed to be relocated onto private property. If the Applicant decides to modify any of the design of the proposed fences and walls or construct additional fences and walls, a condition of project approval indicates that they would be required to comply with SBMC 17.20.040(O) and

17.60.070(C) and (D).

Landscape:

The project is not subject to the water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter

17.56. According to SBMC Section 17.56.040, the regulations apply to modified irrigated September 27, 2023
DRP21-013 Dominguez
667 Marine View Ave

landscaped areas that exceed 2,500 square feet. The proposed project does not include any proposed landscape; therefore, it does not require a landscape review.

Parking:

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a single-family residence. Currently, the property does not provide parking that is compliant with the OSPDM. The project proposes adding two parking spaces located on the proposed driveway near the north side property line. The proposed parking spaces are complaint with the OSPDM.

Grading:

The Applicant proposes to level the existing grade to create a future building pad and construct retaining walls for a new driveway and concrete pad. The new retaining walls are proposed within the required front-yard, interior-side yard, and the buildable area.

The Applicant proposes grading in the amounts of 200 cubic yards of cut and 570 cubic yards of fill, for a total aggregate grading quantity of 770 cubic yards. The project proposes 370 cubic yards of import.

Lighting:

The property is located within the City’s Dark Sky Area; therefore, a condition of project approval includes that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

Usable Open Space:

The project consists of grading for a residential use; therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section

17.20.040.

Property Frontage & Public Right-of-Way Improvements:

The existing property frontage is unimproved with some vegetation. If approved, the Applicant will be required to remove the existing landscaping and construct an 8-ft wide D.G. pathway graded at 2% slope for walking and parking purposes. In addition, a mountable concrete curb for drainage will be required if the project is approved. The driveway approach will also be reconstructed as a condition of approval to meet ADA standards.

September 27, 2023
DRP21-013 Dominguez
667 Marine View Ave

Public Hearing Notice:

Notice of the City Council Public Hearing for the project was published in the Union Tribune more than 10 days prior to the public hearing. The same public notice was mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project site on September 18, 2023. As of the date of preparation of this Staff Report, Staff has not received any formal correspondence from neighbors or interested parties in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed project.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15304 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 15304 is a Class 4 exemption for minor alterations in the condition of land.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
∙ Approve Staff recommendation adopting the attached Resolution 2023-108. ∙ Approve Staff recommendation subject to additional specific conditions necessary for the City Council to make all required findings for the approval of a DRP. ∙ Deny the project if all required findings for the DRP cannot be made.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

The proposed project could be found to be consistent with the General Plan and the SBMC and could be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings required as discussed in this report to approve a DRP. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council Disclosures, Receive Public Testimony, and Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15304 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2023-108 conditionally approving a DRP to conduct grading in excess of 100 cubic yards and perform associated site improvements on a lot with an existing single-story single-family residence at 667 Marine View Avenue, Solana Beach.

September 27, 2023
DRP21-013 Dominguez
667 Marine View Ave

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2023-108

2. Project Plans
RESOLUTION 2023-108

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT TO
CONDUCT GRADING IN EXCESS OF 100 CUBIC YARDS AND

PERFORM ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON A LOT

WITH AN EXISTING SINGLE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE AT 667 MARINE VIEW AVENUE, SOLANA
BEACH
APPLICANT: Andrea Dominguez
CASE NO.: DRP 21-013
WHEREAS, Andrea Dominguez (hereinafter referred to as “Applicant”), has submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on September 27, 2023, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15304 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the Public Hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the Public Hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

I. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

II. That the request for a DRP to conduct grading in excess of 100 cubic yards on a lot with an existing single-family residence is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

III. FINDINGS
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

General Plan Consistency: The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City’s General Plan designation of Estate Residential, which allows for a maximum of one to two dwelling units per acre. The development is also consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SBMC 17.20.030 and

17.48.040), which delineates maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR), Permitted Uses and Structures (SBMC Section 17.20.020), which provides for uses of the property for a single-family residence. Further, the project adheres to all property development regulations established for the Estate Residential (ER-2) and cited by SBMC Section 17.020.030.

The project meets the minimum required front-, street side-, interior side-, and rear yard setbacks.

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

17.68.040.F:
a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses: The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and where feasible, complimentary to existing and potential development in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Site planning on the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects, as well as protection of the property from adverse surrounding influences.

The subject site is located within the Estate Residential (ER-2) Zone. The surrounding neighborhood consists of a mix of properties that are one- and two-story, single-family residences.

The project site is currently developed with a 781 square-foot single-story, single-family residence. The Applicant proposes grading and retaining walls to create a future building pad and a driveway.

As designed, the project is consistent with the permitted uses for the ER-2 Zone as described in Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) Sections 17.20.010 and 17.12.020, which permits one single-family residence. The property is designated Estate Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family residential development with a maximum density of four (0-2) dwelling units per acre. The proposed development could be Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated
neighborhoods.

The property is not located within any of the City’s Specific Plan areas; however, it is located within the boundaries of the Dark Sky Area. The project has been evaluated and the building permit plans would be conditioned to be in conformance with the regulations of the Dark Sky Area. The project is also located within the Coastal Zone. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant will be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver, or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of building or grading permits. b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhances their intended use.

The site is currently developed with a 781 square-foot, singlestory residence. No changes to the existing residence are proposed.

The ER-2 Zone requires 25-foot front-yard setback, 10-foot sideyard setbacks, and a 40-foot rear-yard setback. The proposed project, as designed, meets the minimum required front-yard, side-yard and rear-yard setbacks.
c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

The project is not subject to the water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. According to SBMC
Section 17.56.040, the regulations apply to modified irrigated landscaped areas that exceed 2,500 square feet. The proposed project does not include any proposed landscape; therefore, it does not require a landscape review.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways.

Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view, to the extent feasible, by existing Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.

SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a singlefamily residence. Currently, the property does not provide parking that is compliant with the off-street design manual (OSPDM). The project proposes adding two parking spaces located on the proposed driveway. The proposed parking
spaces are complaint with the OSPDM.

The existing property frontage is unimproved with some
vegetation. If approved, the Applicant will be required to remove the existing landscaping and construct an 8-ft wide D.G. pathway graded at 2% slope for walking and parking purposes. In addition, a mountable concrete curb for drainage will be required if the project is approved. The driveway approach will also be reconstructed as a condition of approval to meet ADA standards. e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

The Applicant proposes to level the existing grade to create a future building pad and construct retaining walls for a new driveway. New retaining walls are proposed within the required front-yard, interior-side yard, and the buildable area.

The Applicant proposes grading in the amounts of 200 cubic yards of cut, 570 cubic yards of fill. The total aggregate grading quantity would be 770 cubic yards. The project requires a DRP for aggregate grading in excess of 100 cubic yards.
f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding areas per SBMC 17.60.060 (Exterior Lighting Regulations).

Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

The property is located within the City’s Dark Sky Area; therefore, a condition of project approval includes that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060). All light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area. g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.

The project consists of grading for a residential use; therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section 17.20.040.

III. All required permits and approvals including variances, conditional use permits, and comprehensive sign plans have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

All required permits shall be processed concurrently with the DRP.

IV. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

As a condition of approval, the Applicant is required to obtain approval from the California Coastal Commission (CCC) prior to issuance of Building and Grading Permits.

IV. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicant shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. The Applicant shall pay required Public Facilities Fees, as established by SBMC Section 17.72.020 and Resolution 1987-36.

II. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the architectural plans presented to the City Council on September 27, 2023, and located in the project file with a submittal date of September 18, 2023.

III. The Applicant shall pay double building permit fees for completing Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

work without required permits.

IV. Any proposed onsite fences, walls and retaining walls and any proposed railing located on top, or any combination thereof, shall comply with applicable regulations of SBMC Section 17.20.040 and

17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).

V. The Applicant shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of Building and Grading Permits.

VI. Native or drought tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into any proposed landscaping and compatible with the surrounding area to the extent feasible.

VII. All new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the Citywide lighting regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060).

VIII. All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.

IX. The aesthetic-illumination of the proposed residence or landscaping is prohibited.

X. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all times feasible. If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicant shall ensure construction vehicles are parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on the street and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.

XI. The Applicant shall connect to temporary electrical service as soon as feasible to the satisfaction of the City. The use of gas-powered generator(s) during construction activity is discouraged and shall be limited only to selective use at the discretion of the City.

XII. Pursuant to SBMC 17.68.040 subsection K, the signed final development plan shall be the official site layout for the property and shall be attached to any application for a building permit for the subject property. Any subsequent revisions or changes to the final development plan as approved by the Council will require an amendment to the approved DRP.

Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

B. Fire Department Conditions:

I. Access road minimum dimensions: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed improved width of not less than 20 feet; curb line to curb line, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Exception: Single-Family residential driveways; serving no more than two single-family dwellings, shall have minimum of 16 feet, curb line to curb line, of unobstructed improved width. Access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of not less than 75,000 pounds and shall be provided with an approved paved surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities.

II. Dead ends: All dead-end fire access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. A cul-de-sac shall be provided in residential areas where the access roadway serves more than four (4) structures. The minimum unobstructed paved radius width for a cul-de-sac shall be 36 feet in residential areas with no parking.

III. Grade: The gradient for a fire apparatus access roadway shall not exceed 20.0%. Grades exceeding 15.0% (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mitigation. Minimal mitigation shall be a surface of Portland cement concrete, with a deep broom finish perpendicular to the entire direction of travel. Additional mitigation measures may be required where deemed appropriate. The angle of departure and angle of approach of a fire access roadway shall not exceed seven degrees (12 percent).

IV. Gates: All gates or other structures or devices, which could obstruct fire access roadways or otherwise hinder emergency operations, are prohibited unless they meet standards approved by the Fire Department. An approved emergency key-operated switch and/or an approved emergency traffic control-activating strobe light sensor shall be installed per Solana Beach Fire Department standards.

V. Obstruction of roadways during construction: All roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width during construction and maintained free and clear, including the parking of vehicles, in accordance with the California Fire Code and the Solana Beach Fire Department.

VI. Address numbers: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background, and shall meet the following minimum standards as to size: 4” high with a ½” inch Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

stroke width for residential buildings, 8” high with a ½” stroke for commercial and multi-family residential buildings, 12” high with a 1” stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers.

VII. Address numbers for structures located off roadway: Where structures are located off a roadway on long easements/driveways, a monument marker shall be placed at the entrance where the easement/driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be affixed to this marker.

VIII. Automatic fire sprinkler system-one- and two-family dwellings:

Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Per the Solana Beach Municipal Code Title 15 Building and Construction Chapter15.32 Fire Code Section

15.32.230 Section 903.2. Any new SFR will be required to have fire sprinklers.

IX. Class “A” roof: All structures shall be provided with a Class “A” Roof covering to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department.

X. Solar photovoltaic installations (Solar Panels): Solar Photovoltaic systems shall be installed per the California Fire Code and Solana Beach Fire Department requirements.

XI. Basement:
a. All basements shall be designed and equipped with emergency exit systems consisting of operable windows, window wells or exit door that's leads directly outside via staircase and exit door or exit door at grade.
b. Window wells/Light wells that intrude into side yard or backyard setbacks of five feet or less, shall require a hinged grating covering the window well/lightwell opening. The grating shall be capable of supporting a weight of 250lb person; yet must be able to be opened by someone of minimal strength with no special knowledge, effort or use of key or tool. Any modification of previously approved plans related to this condition shall be subject to re-submittal and review by City staff (Fire, Building, Planning)
C. Engineering Department Conditions:

Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

XII. The City will accept 4-feet of the existing 10-foot irrevocable offer of dedication, changing the right-of-way line to 24-feet from the Marine View Avenue centerline.

XIII. The Applicant is required to obtain an Encroachment Permit in accordance with SBMC Section 11.20 for the below frontage improvements being done in the public right-of-way. The frontage improvements shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the occupancy of the proposed project:
a. Construction of the 8-ft wide D.G area compacted and graded at maximum 2% towards the flow line for walking and parking purposes. The proposed modular wall to protect the existing power pole shall be designed to accommodate a 5-foot wide accessible path.
b. Construction of the 9” wide sloping concrete curb along the property frontage with transitions to the existing improvements on both ends to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
c. Removal of the existing fence and palm trees in the right of way.

XIV. All construction demolition materials shall be recycled according to the City’s Construction and Demolition recycling program and an approved Waste Management Plan shall be submitted.

XV. Construction fencing shall be located on the subject property unless the Applicant has obtained an Encroachment Permit in accordance with chapter 11.20 of the SBMC which allows otherwise.

XVI. The Applicant shall obtain a Grading Permit in accordance with Chapter

15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code. Conditions prior to the issuance of a grading permit shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. The Applicant shall obtain a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer.

On-site grading design and construction shall be in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code.
b. The Applicant shall obtain a Soils Report prepared by a Registered Soils Engineer and approved by the City Engineer.

All necessary measures shall be taken and implemented to assure slope stability, erosion control and soil integrity. The grading plan shall incorporate all recommendations contained in the soils report.
c. The Applicant shall provide a Drainage Report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. This report shall address the design for detention basin and corresponding outflow system to ensure the rate of runoff for the proposed development is at or below that of pre-existing condition. All recommendations of this report shall Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

be incorporated into the Preliminary Grading Plan. A detention basin easement(s) shall be recorded for maintenance of the detention basins by the property owner(s) in perpetuity, prior to the release of the Grading Bond and Security Deposit.
d. The Applicant shall show all retaining walls and drainage structures. Retaining walls shown on the grading plan shall conform to the San Diego Regional Standards or be designed by a licensed civil engineer. Engineering calculations for all designed walls with a surcharge and nonstandard walls shall be submitted at grading plan check. Retaining walls may not exceed the allowable height within the property line setback as determined by the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code. Contact the Community Development Department for further information. e. The Applicant is responsible to protect the adjacent properties during construction. If any grading, construction activity, access or potential construction-related impacts are anticipated beyond the property lines, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall obtain a letter of permission from the adjoining property owners. All required letters of permission shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the grading permit.
f. Cut and fill slopes shall be set back from site boundaries and buildings in accordance with SBMC 15.40.140 and to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. The Applicant shall pay a grading plan check fee in accordance with the current Engineering Fee Schedule at initial grading plan submittal. Inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the grading permit.
h. The Applicant shall obtain and submit grading security in a form prescribed by the City Engineer.
i. The Applicant shall obtain haul permit for import / export of soil.

The Applicant shall transport all excavated material to a legal disposal site.
j. The Applicant shall submit certification from the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer that all public or private drainage facilities and finished grades are functioning and are installed in accordance with the approved plans. This shall be accomplished by the Engineer of Record incorporating as-built conditions on the Mylar grading plans and obtaining signatures of the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer certifying the as-built conditions. k. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan shall be prepared by the Applicant. Best management practices shall be developed and implemented to manage storm water and nonstorm water discharges from the site at all times during Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

excavation and grading activities. Erosion prevention shall be emphasized as the most important measure for keeping sediment on site during excavation and grading activities. Sediment controls shall be used as a supplement to erosion prevention for keeping sediment on site.
l. The Applicant shall show all proposed on-site private drainage facilities intended to discharge water run-off. Elements of this design shall include a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities and identify any easements or structures required to properly convey the drainage. The construction of drainage structures shall comply with the standards set forth by the San Diego Regional Standard
Drawings.
m. Post Construction Best Management Practices meeting City and RWQCB Order No. R9-2013-001 requirements shall be
implemented in the drainage design.
n. No increased cross lot drainage shall be allowed.
o. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a building pad certification statement from a soils engineer and an engineer or land surveyor licensed in Land Surveying per SBMC

15.40.230E. If a demo permit is required for removing existing structures before grading, the Applicant shall obtain the demo permit separately to certify the grading prior to issuance of the Building Permit.

D. City Council Conditions:

I. N/A
V. EXPIRATION
The Development Review Permit for the project will expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicant has obtained building permits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council according to SBMC 17.72.110.

VI. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this Resolution 2023-108
DRP21-013 – Dominguez Residence
667 Marine View Ave

development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.

In the event of such election, the Applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter.

However, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicant.

NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 27th day of September 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________

LESA HEEBNER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk

GENERAL NOTES
N'PROVAJ. OF THIS GRADING Pl»/ DOES NOT CONSTrTUT[ APPR'CNAL OF VERnCAL OR HORIZONTAL AUGNM[NT OF ANY PR/VA 1f ROAD SHOltN H£REIN FOR PUBUC ROAD PURPOSES.

FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE GRADING PU.NS IS SUB.ECT TD
FlNAL APPROVAL OF TH£ ASSOC/Am> IMPRD'-f:MEN T PL.A.NS
l'IHERE APPUCA.BU. ANAL CURB GRADE ELEVATIONS AU Y
R[OUIR[ CHANGES IN TlifSf PLANS.

J. IMPORT MA IT:RIALS SHALL 8£ L£GALL Y OBTAfNEl),
4 A SEPA.RA T£ PERMIT fR()l,,I THE CITY ENGINEER WILL BE R£0U/RfD FOR ANY WORK IN 11-1£ PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

5. AlL SLOPES 01,UI THRff (3) filT IN H£1GHT SHALL BE
LANDSCAP[D AND IRRIGA rro. THE CONTRACTr.R SHALL VERIFY 1HE EXJS1ENC£ AND LOO,Tlc»I OF ALL UTILJTIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NOTICE OF PROPOSED WORK SHALL BE G/'v£N TO 1HE FOLLO KfNG AGENCIES:

UNDERGROUND S. A.
(800)-227-2600
A SOtLS REPORT SHAU BE PROVIDED AS REO/JfRED BY TH[
CtTY OF Srx..ANA BEACH PRIOR TO JSSUANCf OF A GRADING
PERMIT.

APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY 1HE CJTY ENGINEER DOCS NOT
AUTHORIZE ANY Mll?K OR GRADING TO BE PERFORMED UNTIL
THE PROPfRTY Dlm£R'S PERMISSION HAS BffN OBT.NNED AND A.

VAL.JD GRADING PERMIT HAS BffN ISSUED.

9. THE CITY ENCJN££R'S APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTTTUTf THE BUILDING OFF/DAL'S APPROVAL OF ANY
FOUNDA m:w FOR STRUCTURES ro BE PU.CED ON THE A.REA
CO'vfRED BY THESE PUNS. NO WAl\.£R OF THE GRADING
ORDINANCf REQUIREM£NTS CONC£RNING MINIMUM CO\IE"R O\.'fR EXPANSJ\lf SelLS IS MA.DE OR IMPUED.

10. Ail OPERATIONS CONDUCT£D ON 1HE PREMISES, INCLUDING THE WARMING UP, REPA.JR, ARRIVAL, D£P..A.RTIJRE OR RUNNING OF TRUCJ<S, EARTHM0\1NG EOUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION EOUIPMENT
AND ANY OTHER ASSOC/A TED GRADING EOUIPMENT SHALL 8£ LIMITED TO Tl-IE PERIOD BETWUN 7:00 o.m. AND 6:00 p.m EACH DAY, MONDA Y THROUGH F'RIOAY. AND NO EA.R7HJJ0\1NG OR GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE C~DUCTED ON TH£ PREM/$£$
ON SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS OR HOLJDAYS i.!'THOUT TH£ 'M?ITITN PcRMJSSION OF THE CITY £NGIN££R.

II. AU. MAJOR SLOPES SHALL BE ROUNDED INTO EXISTING TERRAIN TO PRODUCE A CONTOURW 1RANSITICW FROM CUT OR FILL
FACES TO NA.TURA.L GROONO AND ABUTTING CUT OR F1LL FACES.

12. NOT'MTHSTANO/NG THE MINIMUM STANDARDS S£T FORTH IN THE GRADING ORDINANCE, A.ND NDn+f1HSTANOING THE APPROVAL Of THESE GRADING PLANS, THE PERMITTEf 15 RESPONSIBLE FM THE PREVENTION OF DA.MAGE TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. NO
PERSON SHA.LL EXC.A VA 1f <»J LAND SO Q.OSE TO THE
PROPERTY UN£ AS TO ENDANGER ANY ADJOINING PUBUC STRITT.

SIDEWALK, ALLEY, FUNCTTON OF ANY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, OR ANY On-fER PUBUC OR PR/VA 1F PROPERTY ~THOUT
SUPPORnNG A.ND PROTfCTING SUCH PROPERTY FROM S£T1UNG,
CRACKING, EROSJON, SIL 11NG SCOUR OR OTHER DA.MAGE l+HICH J.IIGHT RESULT fR()l,I n-fE GRADING OESCff18ED ON THIS PL.AN.

THE CITY l\1U HOW THE PERJJITTEE RESPONSIBLE FOR
CORRECTION ON NON-DEDICA TfD IMPROVEMENTS 'M-1/CH DAMAGE ADJACENT PROPERTY.

IJ. SLOPE RATIOS: CUT 1:2 RLL 1:2
CUT: 70 CY (OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURE) FILL: 60 CY (OUTSIDE
OF STRUCTURE) EXPORT: 10 CY
CUT: 10 CY (BELOW THE STRUCTURE) FILL: JO CY (BELOW THE STRUCTURE) IMPORT: 20 CY
(NOTE: A SEP ARA 1f VAUD PERMIT MUST EXIST FOR Of'FSJTf IMPORT OR EXPORT AREAS.)
*' THE OUA.NTITIES ESTTMA TED ABOVE ARE FOR PERIJIT

PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION
BIDS. CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR Olm
EARTHWORK OUAN11TIES.

I 4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: IF ANY A.RCHAfLOGICAL RESOURCES ARE OISCO\IE"REO ON THE S1Tf OF THIS GRADING DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, SUCH OPERAnONs liWLL CEASE IMMEDIATELY. AND THE PERMITTfE WILL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGJNEER OF THE
DISCO\o£RY. GRADING OPERA 110NS lt!LL NOT COMMENCE UN11L THE PERMITTEE HAS RECEl\lfD ltR'ITTEN AUTHORITY FROM THE CITY ENGINEER TO DO SO.
15 ALL GRADING SHDMI ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE COMPl.£TED AS A SINGULAR UNIT WITH NO PROVISION FOR PARTIAL RELEASES.

SHOUW IT BE ANTIC/PA TfD THAT A PORTION OF THIS PRO..£CT BE COMPLETfD SEP ARA TEZ. Y, A SEP ARA T£ PLAN AND PERMIT APPL/CA T10N SHALL BE SUBMITTFD FOR APPROVAL
16 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH 858 720.2470 24- HOURS BEFORE GRA.DING OPERA.TIONS BEGIN

17. FINISHED GRADING AND PI..ANTTNG SHALL Bf ACCOMPUSHEO ON AU SLOPES PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, OR IMMEDIATEl.Y UPON
COMPLETION OF A.NY SLOPES GRA.DED BETWffN OCTCSER 1 AND APRIL , PRIOR TO ANY PLANTING, ALL LANDSCAPING SHAU. er APPROVED BY 1HE PLAHNINC D£PAR1MENT AT 1HE DE\flCPM[NT RE\-T[W STAC[. DR BY SEPARA T[ LANOCSAPE PLAN.
18 ALL OFF-SIT£ HAUL ROUTES SH.All. BE SUBJJITTU) BY THE CONTRA.CTOR TO THE CITY tNGINrrR FOR APPROVAL 72 HOURS
PRIOR TO TH[ BEGINNING OF WORK
19 UPON FINAL COMPL£110N OF TH[ WORK" UNOER THE GRADING PERMIT. BUT PRIOR TO f1NA.L GRADfNG APPROVAL A.ND/OR F1NA.L REl..EASE OF SECURITY, AN AS-GFUDED CERTIRCATE SHAU BE
PRO'ADfD STAnHG: ·mE GRADING UNDER PERMIT No. SBGR-216
HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN SUBSTANnA.L CONF"ORIJA.NCE "971-1 THE APPRO\IFD GRADING PUN OR AS SHOWN ON TH[ ATTACHED
AS-GRADED PLAN•. THIS STATEMENT SHA.LL BE F"Cx.tOWED BY THE DA TE AND SJGNA TIJRE CN=" THE Cl\11L ENGINEER ltHO CfRTTF/£S SUCH A GRADING OPERATION.

20. THE CONTRACTOR SHAU DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, A.ND MAINTAIN A.LL SAFETY DE'ACES INCLUDfNG SHORING, AND SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL. STA TE. ANO
FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEA.LTH STANDARDS, LAWS AND
REGULA T10NS.
----
0 10
Drawn By

VICINITY MAP NOTTO SCALE
SCALE: 1' = 10'
I 20 30

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

PRE-EXISTING GRADES
PROPERTY UN£ ----
----
RELOCATH )( P,'ll,/TREE

FRQMR,W
'\__,_o
EX.E PA.I/EM
w
:::::,
z
w
>
w
z
O:'.
<(
2 LOCATION
OF
RELCX,UE . PALM TREE FROM
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL J OF PARCEL WP 8089, IN TH£ CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, swr OF CAf.lFORNIA. ACCORDING TO 1W' THEREOF f"IL£D IN THE omcE OF TH[ COUNTY RECORDER OF SN/ DIEGO COUNTY. NOVEMBER 22. 1978.

A.P.N.:

SITE ADDRESS :

OWNERIPERMITTEE :
298-J90-J5-00
667 MARINE VIEW AVeNUE
DEL AIAR, CA 9201 4
A.NORD, DOMINGUEZ
667 MARINE V1EW A"VENU[
D£l MAR, CA 9201 4-
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY : 9555 GENESIT AV£1,JU£, SUfTE 200
54N DIEGO. CA 9212 1 (858)-587-8070
LOT AREA : GROSS: 25,517 SF (0.586 AC.)
NET": 23,714 SF (0.5+4 AC.)
RESIDENCE AREA : ±781 SF
ZONE: ER-2b
OV£RLA.Y ZONE: DARK SKY ARE.A.S OVERLAY ZONE

WORK TO BE DONE THE IIJPRDVEMENTS CONSIST OF THE FOUOWING WORK TO BE DONE ACCORDING TO THESE PL.A.NS AND TH[ lATfST EDff/ONS OF;

STANDARD SPECIF/CA TJONS
(1) STANDARD SPECIACATTONS F'OR PUBLJC WORKS CONSTRUCTNJN INCLUDING TJ-IE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL AJ,/ENDMfNTS.
(2) CALIFORNIA DEPARTM£NT OF TRANSPORTATION .MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROLS F"OR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTcNANCE WORK ZONES.
(J) STATE OF OLIFORNIA. DEPARTll£NT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDAAD SPEC/FlC,.TIONS STANDARD DRAWINGS ( 1) 5.1H DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD ORAW,NGS (2) STATE OF OLIFORNIA, OEPARTll£NT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDAAD PUNS

SCOPE OF WORK
TO P£RMr7 THE IUECAL GRADING A.ND CDNSTRUCTTON OF A CDNCRCTE P>D TD PERMIT THE FVn.lRE GRADJNG FOR A NEW DRIVEWAY NlD PN).

LEGEND
~IPTION

PROPERTY UNE
CENmlUNE OF R<WJ
S£TBl,CKS
SYMBOt.

DI/STING CDHTOUR UNE
PRE-Dl1511NG CDHTOUR UNE
DI/STING CHAIN UHK F£NC[
DI/STING WOODEN F£/ICE
-------l51-----
-- x -- x
-0-----0------0

OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
I, ==~=~=======- A.S OWNER/DEVflOPER OF THE PROP[RTY DESCRIBED HEREIN ACKNOWl.£DGE THESE PLANS HA.VF BEEN PREPARED AT MY DIRECTION W1TH MY FULL CONSENT. I FUU Y UNDERSTAND AHO ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDmONS CONTAIN£D HEREJN AND AS ATTACHED BY REFERENCE ON THIS GFWJING PI.A.N.

IT 15 AGREED THAT RElD CONDmONS MAY REOUIRE CHANGES TO THESE PLANS.

IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE: OWNER (DEVfLOPER) SHALJ.. HA~ A RfGISTERED CML ENGINEER MAKE SUCH CHANGES, AL7fRATIONS Off ADDITIONS TO THESE PL..4HS WHICH THE CITY ENGINITR DETER/JINES ARE NECESSARY AND DESIRABLE FOR THE PROPER COMPL£T10N OF THE IMPROVfJJE:WS.

I FURTHER AGRff 10 COMMENCE WORK ON ANY IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WrTHIN EXISTING CITY RIGI-IT-DF-WA.Y WITHIN 60 ~YS OF THE CONSTRUCTTON PERMfT .A.ND TO PURSUE SUCH WORK AC1Tv£LY ON EVERY NORMAL WORKING !MY UNTIL COMPLETED.

IRRESPECTTV[ AND INDEPENDENT OF ANY OTHffi WORK ASSOCIATED W1TH THIS PROJECT OR

UNDER MY CONTROL

ANDREA DOMINGUEZ
667 MARINE V'IEW AVENUE
DEL w.R, C-' 92014

DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
I. BRIAN U. ARDOLJNO, HfREBY DECLARE OOT ! A.U TH£ ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT, THAT I ~~ £XCERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER TH£ DESIGN OF THE PROJECT AS DffiNED IN SECOON 6703 OF TH[ BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE. AND TH£ DESIGN IS CONSISTENT wrTfl CURRENT STANDAADS AND THE CITY OF SOWIA BEACH RESOLLJnON No. 2007-170.

I UNDERSTAND THAT T1-IE CH£CK OF PROJECT ORA.WINGS AND SPECIF1CAT10NS BY THE CrTY OF S~ BEACH 15 CONFINED TO A RfY1EW ONLY AND DOES NOT RruM ME OF RESPONSIBIUTTES FOR PROJECT DESIGN.
j:);,., ~ 8/0l/2J
BY: ___ ____________ _
BRIAN ARDOLINO RCE No. 71651 EXP 12/J1/202J
PASCO LARET SUfTfR & .ASSOCIATES
Received
City of Solana Beach Planning Department
09/18/2023 jdelmer

COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH DRAW/NONO.

PREUMINAR Y GR.A.DING PU.N Fe:¥?:
667 MARINE VIEW A VENUE SHEET I OF 4
PLSA. J70J
SCALE 1• = 10'
20 30

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

PROTECT EX CONCRETE
PAD 11/.PLACE

CONCRETE
PAD

EXISTING GRADES
--
--
----,CityEllginccr
Dau:: __ _
-
1-!:~.:
• I 7 ~I BRICK I I PATIO,·
I I
' I --'f?i-..J
I
I
RELOCATE EX. PALM TREE FRQMRJ,V
~APPR EX.

PAVEJ.
"c'-ti( I ,_•'k-tf""'"
-/ Ii ~=,
I .:

I I
;m
I/ __ J yf -------:_(11 /.
exfs1ff!l!ffl SET "X" cN IN-Pf.ACE WALL
PROTECT EXISTfllii WATER SERVICE NID l.fETER 111-Pl..-\CE I PPt, 1008JJi!H )
2 0.60-
LEGEND
~IPT!ON
PR.QP[RTY LJNE
CE/m"RUNf OF RC•D
ABBRl=VIATIONS
FYSB
RYS.B
SYSB
FS
FG
w_~
z
Lu
>
<C
s
w
>
z
0:::
<(
2 LOCATION
OF
PALM
;;;-
~
c
~
~NT YARD ':JETBACV
8/CK tARD 5£TBACt. SfD[ YARD Sf:TBACK
F1NfSH['J SUPF'ACf
f/NISHi:..D GRAD£
----i5l----
--x --x
-{J -_}- -

DRAWING ND, BENCH MARK CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
~~~~rP'RER,i];;uuiiM,N.Aff-RYTiGRm..ioi-o,NNGG 6~Pc~6~7:DRMARINE~- :;;;~V~I~E;W;~A~V~E~NUE~;~- SHEET20F4
FLSA .J71}J

EROSION CONTROL NOTES
I. S'{ORM WATE.'R AND NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGf. CONtROL: BEST UANAG£M£NT ~RAC"TICE:S $f-.',;J..L er DM!_OPED -'<ND NP/..£Mf,',>'TD) iC1 MAf,1.~cr STMU Wti!R !-'ID NON-SIOR/J ,l~TER DISCHAP.G£S rROM TH£ Sff£ AT AL.I.. TIMES DUR,.w; E:/.CAVA1iJN /o}W GRAfJ/NG AC1MTlfS,

2. ~iROSJVU AND-SEDIMENT CCUTROt..-EROStGN PRi:'lEHTIGf.· 5H.4.u.. Bf i.JJPHAS.ZEV A.i THE uosr IMPORTANT ME'ASURE FO.f? KEE:PltJG SWJMENT ON sm: DURING EXCA.VAncN AHD GRNJ/,'.'C ACTi/,T/£5, SEOWCNT CC,'flROL':, SHl' L BE usm ,.::;; A S,)?PLEl.'EJ'IT y.::, EROSION PF?E'rilfllON FOR K££PlhG Sf.im,.fDfi ON SliL
J. CROSJC', CONTl·JOL c:: SLCC.E;S s,Li.i!.L B[ Mmo:JED £( fNSTJ.:.J.JNG L..iNOSC!..P/NG ).$ REOUIRED Br TH[ D£\l'£1.0PMM R£Vlfll COtJDii1mJs, OR /3Y TflJPORAPY EROSION CONTROL CONFORMING TO TH£ FOLLOWING:
!.Bue~~•.E 20
50 8
6 L
91 t;,'N-IR_F ?mJ,"• _i_f.YQE,'$.EJlLJ.','X WJT>-o'
A fJBFR 114IBIX APPl,(t'D AT 4 ODD I BIACRF z p1,qur1~"Rf ~::s. 70% ;:;~us ATF, 0 LE:X. GI.A/JC.:.

SCAR,'c/E[)
50:: PLUS
Pl.ANTAGE INSULARtS EN~ms FtP/NO~A
LOTV$ SCPAR/US
D<CHSCHOLTZIA CN,.IF
4, THE 'TOPS or ALL SLOP[$ Tl>L.L.E:R 1HAH 5' SHAU Bf! OiK£D OR TR£NCH[r0 TO PROCNT ,'IATEF rww1:;::; ovtJ;> CRESTS or SLOPES

5. CATCH BASINS, DESfLTING BASINS, AND STORM DRIJN SYSffMS Sr'A/.1. 8£ INSTP .. L.ED TO iH[ 5,:TJSFA.CT'ON Cr:" THE: '.:fTY [/,'"]'/NEEF'
6 SAND BAG CHECK i:wts, SILT r[Hefs, F18.E;;R ROl,.1,.S OR OTHER APPROV£D BVP'S Sf-I.AU.

BE PL:.:;Ef) F: UNPA',ED AFFAS 11·,-:-1-1 GR~OJWT': IN E)T!:TSS c: 2%, .\S iff~~ AS ;·· OR NEAR £VERY PO!rlT WH£Re CONCE.NTRAT£D Ft.OW l[A\1£ THE SfiE r SAND r?AGS S•!ALL E PU<':CD ON THE' '),...,STRE:/ 1.f SID.': OF MIN!UIZE Sil T BUILDUP TN THF INLETS AND PIPES.

DRf.'.'IAG£ ,·','i.ITS 'D

8. T,;£ C:J,VTRACT,JR $•{:.L.L fo_e>AJR /.J,'f Ef-C·JED s: OPES ,:s DJP:Y~TED F3Y Tf--:t om:_r OF THE CITY ENGINITR.

9. ''1[ CC'./TRACOR S,1:.1__1,. S,\i::EP HJADWA: ::": ANO [UTRN,'::£5 TU ANE r'ROM TH£ SiTf ON A REGULAR 84$1S TO KEEP THEM FRff OF SOIL ACCUMULATION AND AT ALL OTHER TIMES fJfR£CTFD BY THE Crrf ENCWEER
10 TH£ CONTRACTOR SHALL WA'frR SIT£ ON A CONTINUOUS 8ASI$ TO M/NlWlC AIR BORN[ DUST C~E.Arro FROV GRAD'.~!C Af!C HAU'.,NG OPfRATIC~:s OP [XC[S';rv[ w,~:o cmmmow; ANO Al ALL :,•,1£5 D'R£CTE, 8'1' ~'-!£ C1TY £1JG .. '.':i1?.

Sil.T FENCE (IYP)

PROPOSED RIP--PN ENERGY DISSIPATOR
I
J ___,___,_______\1
--
--
0 10
\_ REMOVE EXJSn CHiCKEN COOP
SCALE: 1• =- 10'
=::s 20 30
BNGJ.\"EER OF \VORK
GRADED SLOPES 7 HrVR&W/tn .
lW15S.O
BW153.0
PEG153.0
.,,_
PROPOSED I CONCRETE p~
I'S<"}/ I
Flc
I
CIT'r' APPROVED CHAhGES

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

PRE-EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES
s~ r FENCE (TYPJ
/ \\
/
,

IPROTECTEX
FENCE
IN-Pl.ACE
I
r---
I ' I
I '
I
I
I I • . I
C J
• / /,

PROTECT

EXISTIN-G
ES!DENCE

IN-PUCE
-----
-- ----- -----
-- -----
--
APP'D iDATE. RECOMl\fENDED FOR APPROVAL
-- _j
-----

APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
3:1
,, i
' 1__;_ _,,,,;,-
I i .. I ; 2'i
3:-1,<..:- °'l-s -IL4,J
fu
1'.i
1 \
~ 11! ~ '
1r1~ K ~ r; __ _
PROTECT EXJSTINGPP IN-Pl.ACE
: j 1 1 ·PROPOSED!f PCC I ~ . WlirtfkfiETA/L
l It~ LLJ
~ ' ~
z
·: 2%
w 'I PROPOSED > MODUIAR RETAIi/iNG
NO
>< . :-
1; is
] i!
r ~ J
11 ><·
I:
} I
~ I
)1- 1
t: I \ ;
;,..
ci :s: ~

1..,
!
V,!TH//1
~ ~ ~ >
~---+"'----20' ----! RELOCATE EX PAU./mEE
FRO/JR#{
ld
z
0::

PROPOSEDDG

PARKVIAY
RaOCA.TE .PALM TREEFROIJ W
PROPOSED 9• PCC MOUNTABLE
CURB SeE DETAIL
LEGEND
TftiJDfsCi1Pncs
PJWOfRTY UN£
\ CEH1£RUN£ OF ROAD
WP4CKS
P;;()P()S[D COil/OUR UN£
[Xi;>nt-Ki CONTOUR UNE
£XtJING C•:'NN Lr,'X ro.:::

EXl!i1iliG W(/i)/)£fl ffJICE
PR;.;FOSED R£TA,1f1J'IC WALL
GR/.!_'"'}flG L,urrs
SILT FfNCf.

PROfOSED STO.'fM DIWN t'iP£
PRCPOSEIJ CONCFT[ HAP2'5CAP!:

ABBREVIATIONS
rrSB FRotif y,.:Ro SITBACK RY5B BACK YARD S£18ACV
SYSiJ SIDE tARD 5UB4Cr.

FS F1NISHED SURFAC£
FG F1N/Sr'[O GR,1DE
TW FIN/Srl£1) GRAD£ Al WP Oi WALt. 81'1 FINISHED GRAD£ AT BOITCJU WALL £G £X/$Tl'.'S GR·'--JE:

PEG PR[-£XISTING GPA.Di
------151-----
j,
c-1" __2jL C' J,;:j
i- ,-_.· , __ ••
9"X9"XI2" MOUNTABLE CURB CONCRETE SHALL EE SZO..C--2500 EARTHWORK QUANTITIES : SffE' GRAOfNG•
cur
Fl:i:

11..!?0RT:
;:,-;,') CY
570 CY J7D er

EX CAVA T!ON FO? FOOi//,JGS: C CY
R£V0\1Ai. d- RD:OJJ"ACTf(:1/1/ (UN!J£R STPIJCTUPt}: 0 CY AGGREGATE GRADING. 770 CY
• f:l.,RirlWORK ou.wrmrs 1/>f; £$Ti!J41ED FOR P[RIJtr PURPOS:s ONLY AND OffRB~NT ~•JPAC'F') (IN P!...ACf"' vc;_u.u~ 0!'11_ r, 71--1!:5£ VALLZ.S Afh CALC.ATE! CN A -:-·1'£0fE. -,CA!. 2)$/5. ,::::TIJA! 1}UAN7 ES Vt..Y VARY OUE TO OESat'IE"D SHRU,'KA.G( M.'0/0R SWELL f,CTORS.

BENCHMARK CITY OF SOLANA BEACH DI~AWn,·aNo
Pr?t/JM/f!AP.Y G~AD!NC PLAN 't'Jii.
667 MARINE VIEW A VENUE Si!BBT 3 OF4
PLSA 3703

EROSION CONTROL NOTES
I. STORM WA7rR ANO NON-STORM WATfR DJSCHARG[ CONTROL: BEST WMGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE DEVfLOPED AND IMP/.O,/£NTED TO MANAGE STORM WATER IINO NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM TH[ snr AT >J.1- TIMES OUR/NC D(CAVATJON AND Gll,ll)/NG AC7MTl[S.

2. EROSION IIND SEDIMENT CONTROL: EROSION PRE\lfNTION SHALL BE [MPHASIZE'D AS THE MOST IMPORTANT MEASUR£ FOR KEEPING SEDIMENT ON SITE DURING £XCA.VATION MD GRADING AC1M11ES. S£DIM£HT CONTROLS S~LL Bf USED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO EROSION PREVrnTION FOR KEEPING 5£0/MENT ON 517t.

J. EROSION COWTROL ON SLOPES SHAU BE umGATED BY INSTAL.1.JNG u.NDSC4PING AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMOIT RE'VIEW CONDfTIONS, OR BY TD.IPORARY EROSION CONTROL CONFORMING TO THE FOUOWING:
~
20 50
8 6
L
91 NON- JRR/GATfP H'rfJRQSFfQ JJIX W11H
A EIBFR MATRIX APPi /FD AT 4 ODO 18/ACRE % PURITY/ACRE .s££/l..SE£C.l£ 70:C PLUS ATRIPLEX GLAUCA SCAR/Fl[D
50% PLUS
PI.ANTAGE /NSULARIS
ENCWS FARINOSA.

LOTUS SCOP.A.RIUS
EXCHSCHOL Tl/A C4LJF.
4-. THE TOPS OF ALL SLOPES TALLER THAN 5' SHN.J. BE DIKED DR TRENCHED TO PREVE!ff WATER fl01t1NG OVfR CRESTS OF SLOPES.

5. CATCH BASINS. 0£5/LnNG BASINS, AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS SHAU. 8£ /HST,ill£D TO TH£ SATISFACTTON OF TH£ CITY cHC/NffR.

6. SAIJD SAG CHECK OWS, SILT FFHCES. F1B£R ROUS OR 01HER APPROVED BLIP'S SW.U.

Bf Pl.}.C[O IN UNPAVED >REAS W1TH GRADIENTS IN EXCESS Of" 2:f, AS ml AS AT OR NEAR £\lfRY POI/fl WHD?f CONCENTRATfD now L£AY[ THE SIT[_

7. SNW 8"'GS SFW.L BE PU,CED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF ALL DRiJNAGE INLETS TO MINIMIZE SILT BUILDUP IN TH£ INLF:TS NID PIPES.

8. TH£ CONTRACTOR SHAU. REPAIR NIY ERODED SLOPES ,s DIRECTED BY THE omcE OF TH£ CITY £NGINffR.

9. TH£ CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP ROO)WAYS NIO flff/W/C[S TO NIO FROM TH£ SITE ON A RfGUI..A.R BASIS TO KITP THEM FRff OF SOIL ACCUMULATION MD AT ALL OTHER m.tES DIR£CTED 8Y TH£ CITY ENGINEER.

10. TH£ CONTRACTOR SJW..L WA.TcR SITE ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS TO J.1/NIMIZf ~R BORN£ DUST CREATED FROM GFWJING AND fil.ULJNC OPERATIONS OR EXCESSIV( lt1ND CONDmONS, A.ND AT ALL TIUES DIRECTED BY n-1£ CITY ENC/NEER.
1 J. IN THE E'V£NT SILT DOES ENTER THE fX/S11NG PUBLJC STORM DIWH SYSTEM, REMOVAL OF Tf/E SILT mow lliE lliE SYSTEII "1ll 8£ OONE AT THE DEVELOPER'S [XP[NS[.

I
SI. T FENCE (TYP)

PROPOSED RIP-IW'EHERGY OISSIPATOR
--
----- 0 10
PROPERTY· UNE
SCALE: 1" = 10'
I 20 30
PROTECT EX.
~ " PROPOSED /
CONCRETEPA£l:,
FS:-155.0i t ~
F C " I

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

PRE-EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES
FG151.5
\'¾-

3.J' TALL /

WOOD PICKET
FENCE
------ ------
--
--
...

IPROTECTEX. FENCE
IN-Pf.ACE
------
----r- 7.s· J,,,.,. ---
• I l :JI BRICK I ~, PATIO l <o I Icy I ,~
'---- I 7_7,-..J
--
o------------------------ -+------EN_G_lNEER __ o_F~"'~o_RK_' _____ --1 _ __ cITY __ AP_1'_R_O_VE_o_c_HAN __ a_E_s_-+_AP_r_o ... o_A_TE-< RECOMMENDEDFORAPPROVAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION Drawn By ,City Eap.Dcer
xp: Date: ___ _ Date: ___ _
PROTECT EXISTING PP SET "X" ON
IN-Pf.ACE WALL
,.,
r t
I :.. PRO CT E)(JST/NG WATER SERVICE , CE I

0.60•

BENCHMARK
-----
PROPOSED 9" PCC UOUNT'ABLE CURB. SEE DETM.
w
z
3:
w
>
L.,J
z
Q:'.
<t
2 PROPOSED

MOOUIAR RETAJNIIG WALLAS
NECESSAA~ //0 EXCAVATIO'I WfTHIN 5'DFPOt..E. 1
;;;-
0 N J
!E
0 ;:!_

PROPOSEOOG PARKWAY
PROPOSED 9' PCC MOUNTABLE CURB. SEE DETNI...

I
J
LEGEND
7ffiiofscR1PTIQN
PROPERTY UN£
CENTERUN[ Of R(W)

SETBACKS
PROP(JSED CONTOUR UN[
DIIS/1//G COi/TOUR UN£
EXISTING CHAIN LJNK FDIC£
- ----151 -----
/ EXISnNC WOODEN FENCE

PROPOSED RITAIN/IIG WALL

GIIADINC UM/TS
SILT F£NC£
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN P/Pf
PROP(JSfD CONCRfTE IWIOWFE

GR,IJJ/NC EXCAVAIION

GIIADINC EIIBANKMENT
ABBREV/A TIONS FYS8
I ~~: ,r;
7W
aw
EG
PEG
FROHT Y>RD SETBA.CK
BACK Y.4RD S~CK
510£ YARD SETBACK AN/SHED SURF"AC[
FINISHED GRA.D[
FINISHED GRAD[ AT TOP OF WALL F1NISHED GRAD( AT 80TTOM WALL EXISTING GRAD[

PRE-EXISTING GRADE
2" CRIN AND OVERLAY
I: ,
9''X9"X12" MOUNTABLE CVRB CONCRETE SHA1.1. BE 520-C-2500 EARTHWORK QUANTITIES : SITE Gll,ll)/NG:

CUT,
F1ll:

IMPORT:
200 CY
570 CY
J70 CY
EXCA.VA11DN FUR FOOTTNGS: 0 CY
REMOVAL & RECOMPACTION {UNDER STRUCTURE): 0 CY
AGGREGATE GR/,D/NG: 770 CY
-·• -_ ·1
• EARTHWORK OUANTTT/£5 >RE ESTIMATED FOR PfRUrT PURPOSES ONLY AND REPRESENT COMPACTED {IN Pl.A.CE) 1/0LUU[S ONLY. TH[S[ VALUES ARE c.,J..CULATED ON A THf:ORIT/00 BASIS. AC1lJAL OUANTT11£S MAY VARY DUE TO OBSERVED SHRINY.ACE AND/ OR SWE"ll FACTORS.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH DRAWING NO.

PRELJMINARY GRADING PL.AN FOR:
667 MARINE VIEW A VENUE SHEET4 0F4
PLSA J70J
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager’s
SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance 531 Amending Chapter 10.44 (Miscellaneous Driving Rules) of Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Solana Beach
Municipal Code Regarding Bicycles, In Addition, City
Council Consideration of Resolution 2023-113 Approving
$10,000 for a Bicycle and Electric Bicycle Training and Diversion Program
BACKGROUND:

At the July 12, 2023 City Council (Council) meeting, Council held a robust discussion on bicycle and electric bicycle (E-bikes) safety. These discussions centered around potential measures to implement throughout the community to increase the safety of all bicycle riders in light of the recent tragedies in Encinitas and Carlsbad. Council directed Staff to come back to a subsequent Council meeting to introduce an ordinance amending the City’s current Municipal Code to include additional violations that the Sheriff’s Department can enforce for unsafe bicycle and E-bike behavior.

At the August 23, 2023 Council meeting, Council introduced Ordinance 531 amending Chapter 10.44 of Title 10 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) and directed Staff to develop a training and diversion program for citations for first time bicycle and E-bike violations. Council did make one modification to Ordinance 531 when introducing it, which is included in track changes in Attachment 1.

This item is before the Council to consider adoption of Ordinance 531 (Attachment 1) amending Chapter 10.44 of Title 10 of the SBMC. In addition, Council is asked to consider adopting Resolution 2023-113 approving an allocation of $10,000 for a bicycle and E-bike training and diversion program.

September 27, 2023
Bicycle Safety and Ordinance 531 Adoption

DISCUSSION:

Ordinance 531 amends Chapter 10.44 Title 10 to include more violations for bicycle and E-bike-related behavior than just the prohibition of riding bicycles on sidewalks. The amended language now gives our Sheriff deputies the ability to give citations for various dangerous behaviors, as well as implement a diversion program for first time offenders that allows them to complete a training course to remove the citation and fine. Staff will work with the Sheriff’s Department and the San Diego Bicycle Coalition to offer these trainings to satisfy the diversion program. Staff will also continue to work with the local School Districts, and potentially share costs, to offer additional training courses for children that intend to ride their bicycles and E-bikes to school. Approval of Resolution 2023-113 will allocate $10,000 to provide these training and diversion programs.

In addition, there was discussion at the August 23, 2023 Council meeting regarding the inclusion of other motorized transportation devices such as scooters, skateboards and motorized one-wheel vehicles (scooters, segways, pints, unicycles, etc.). The Vehicle Code already prohibits scooters on sidewalks. Vehicle Code Section 21235(g) provides that the operator of a motorized scooter shall not operate a motorized scooter upon a sidewalk, except as may be necessary to enter or leave an adjacent property. If Council desires to explore including additional rules and regulations for these modes of transportation, Staff can return at a future Council meeting.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

This action is not a project, as defined in Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is therefore, not subject to environmental review. The Ordinance, if adopted, would not result in either a physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

If Council adopts Ordinance 531, it is recommended that the Council also adopts Resolution 2023-113 allocating $10,000 for the City work with the Coalition to provide training classes including those that would satisfy the voluntary diversionary program for citations. The allocation of $10,000 would be to the Community Services – Professional Services account.

WORK PLAN:

This item is consistent with Community Character Priorities – Capital Projects Priority Item 20 – Electric Bicycle (E-Bike) Safety and Education Program in the 2023/24 Work Plan.

September 27, 2023
Bicycle Safety and Ordinance 531 Adoption

OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff recommendation.
• Do not approve Staff recommendation.
• Provide direction to Staff.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt Ordinance 531 amending Chapter 10.44 (Miscellaneous Driving Rules) of Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code regarding bicycles.

2. Approve Resolution 2023-113 allocating $10,000 to the Community Services – Professional Services account to provide training and diversion programs for first time violators.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 531

2. Resolution 2023-113
ORDINANCE 531

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SOLANA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.44
(MISCELLANEOUS DRIVING RULES) OF TITLE 10
(VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE SOLANA BEACH

MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING BICYCLES
WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach (City) enacted Section 10.44.010 of Chapter

10.44, Title 10 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code, to regulate bicycle use within City limits; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.08.010 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code, violations of Chapter 10.44 are punishable by infractions, unless otherwise stated; and WHEREAS, the City has seen a noticeable increase in the number of electric bicycles (e-bikes) within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has experienced a rise in collisions involving e-bikes resulting in injuries, including serious injuries; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide the chief officer in command of Solana Beach law enforcement services or designee the ability to require bicycle operators and passengers, including those on e-bikes, the opportunity to take an approved bicycle safety course in lieu of a citation for a first offense for a violation of Section 10.44.010; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to amend Section 10.44.010 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code accordingly to enhance the public health, safety, and welfare.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does ordain as follows:

SECTION ONE. FINDINGS.

The City Council finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein as findings and determinations of the City Council. The recitals constitute findings in this matter and, together with the staff report, other written reports, public testimony and other information contained in the record, are an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the actions taken in this Ordinance.

SECTION TWO. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.

This action is not a project, as defined in Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is therefore, not subject to environmental review. The adoption Ordinance 531

)
of this ordinance does not result in either a physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

SECTION THREE. AMENDMENT TO SOLANA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION

10.44.010.

Section 10.44.010 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (deletions in strikeout and additions in underline):

10.44.010 Bicycles. Riding bicycles on sidewalks prohibited.

A. Any person operating or riding a bicycle shall exercise reasonable care and observe all applicable laws including yielding to pedestrians.

B. It is unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle upon any sidewalk in a business district or on any street with a designated bicycle path or way.

C. It shall be unlawful for the operator of any bicycle to carry any other person upon the handlebars of any such bicycle or for any person to so ride, or in any other manner not designed for passenger riding, upon any such bicycle upon any street, roadway, highway, or public place.

D. Every operator or passenger riding a bicycle upon a roadway shall be granted all of the rights and shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to the operator or passenger of a vehicle established by this title, except those provisions which by their nature can have no application.

E. In lieu of the imposition of the penalties authorized by this title and/or the filing of charges in a court of competent jurisdiction, the chief of police or designee may allow a first-time violator of this chapter to complete a police department-approved bicycle safety course.

SECTION FOUR. SEVERABILITY.

If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or term (each a "Provision”) in this Ordinance, or any Provision's application to any person or circumstance, is held illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, all other Provisions not held illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional, or such Provision's application to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected. The City Council declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each Provision therein, whether any one or more Provisions be declared illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional.

SECTION FIVE. PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach shall cause this Ordinance 531

Ordinance to be published pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933.

INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California on the [INSERT DAY] day of [INSERT MONTH], 2023; and
THEREAFTER ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California on the ___ day of ________, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST
______________________________ ____________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2023-113

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
ALLOCATION OF $10,000 FOR A BICYCLE AND

ELECTRONIC BICYCLE TRAINING AND DIVERSION

PROGRAM
WHEREAS, at the July 12, 2023 City Council (Council) meeting, Council held a robust discussion on bicycle and electric bicycle (E-bikes) safety; and WHEREAS, at the August 23, 2023 Council meeting, Council introduced Ordinance 531 amending Chapter 10.44 of Title 10 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) and directed Staff to develop a training and diversion program for citations for first time bicycle and E-bike violations; and
WHEREAS, at the September 27, 2023 Council meeting, Council adopted Ordinance 531, including the diversion program for first-time offenders. An allocation of funding is necessary to provide the training and diversion program.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council authorizes the allocation of $10,000 to the Community Services – Professional Services account to fund the training and diversion program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of September 2023, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.2.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: Engineering Department
SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of Resolution 2023-111 Awarding a Construction Contract for the La Colonia Tot Lot Construction Project and Amend the PSA with VDLA
for Construction Support Services
BACKGROUND:

The play structure at La Colonia Park was installed in 2003 and experiences high daily use. In March 2021, the City executed a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Van Dyke Landscape Architects (VDLA) for the design of new Tot Lots at La Colonia Park and Fletcher Cove Park. On May 4, 2022, a Community Workshop was held as part of a Special Council Meeting to discuss the progress to date on the Tot Lot Projects and to obtain additional feedback from the community and City Council on the design features selected for the new Tot Lots. Project updates were provided to the City Council on July 13, 2022, and September 28, 2022. The projects were originally combined for efficiency purposes (design, community feedback, Council feedback, etc.) but were separated in final design. Construction of the Fletcher Cove Tot Lot was completed in June 2023.

Construction of the La Colonia Tot Lot is now ready to move forward.

This item is before the City Council to consider approving Resolution 2023-111 (Attachment 1) to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, Western Rim Constructors, Inc. (Western Rim), for the replacement of the La Colonia Tot Lot and to amend the PSA with VDLA for construction support services.

DISCUSSION:

Award of Construction Contract
Construction documents for the La Colonia Tot Lot Replacement, Bid No. 2023-08, were prepared and the project was advertised for construction bids. On September 14, 2023, September 27, 2023
Award La Colonia Tot Lot Construction Contract

five bids for the Bid No. 2023-08 were received and publicly opened by the City Clerk.

The bid results are listed below.

Bid Results
Contractors Base Bid
Western Rim Constructors, Inc. $1,124,554.00
Marina Landscape, Inc. $1,188,695.50
De La Fuente (DLF) Construction, Inc. $1,199,614.86
R.E. Schultz Construction, Inc. $1,219,287.90
Fordyce Construction, Inc. $1,250,940.50
The lowest bid submitted by Western Rim was found to be complete and responsive to the bid specifications. Prior work references were checked and found to be satisfactory, and Western Rim has a valid contractor’s license. Staff is recommending that Western Rim be awarded the construction contract. The contract duration is 120 working days (24 weeks). It is anticipated the project will be completed by May 24, 2024. Staff is also recommending a construction contingency of $95,056 (approximately 8.5%) to cover unexpected changes or site conditions encountered during construction.

Amendment of PSA with VDLA
In addition to the construction contract with Western Rim, Staff is recommending an amendment to the PSA with VDLA for additional expenses incurred during design and construction support services. The additional expenses incurred during design include additional coordination with the equipment manufacturer to provide three roof and color options, an additional presentation to the City Council on the additional roof and color options and the substitution for the dome climber detailed below. The construction support services will include standard as-needed construction administration tasks such as reviewing submittals, responding to design specific requests for information and periodic site inspections. The requested amendment to the PSA with VDLA, if approved, would increase the compensation amount by $12,000.

Playground Equipment Changes
On August 29, 2023, the City was notified that the original dome/net climbing structure approved by Council is no longer available. The manufacturer provided two replacement options. Attachment 2 shows renderings of the VistaArc Orbiter and Attachment 3 shows renderings of the GT Wave. Aesthetically, the VistaArc Orbiter appears more like the originally approved dome/net structure and the GT Wave appears to have more recreational features including an additional slide. It should be noted that slides were rated highly on the community surveys received during the public outreach component of the design. There is a slight cost difference between the two options with the GT Wave being approximately $5,500 more expensive ($69,440 for VistaArc Orbiter versus $74,902 for GT Wave). Staff is seeking formal Council direction on the selection of this replacement play structure.

September 27, 2023
Award La Colonia Tot Lot Construction Contract

Additionally, the City will be purchasing three components of the playground equipment directly from the manufacturer to take advantage of a discount program the manufacturer has established to keep their factory busy during a slower time of the year. In order to receive this manufacturer’s discount, the cost of the equipment must be paid in full by a check, the order must be placed by October 27, 2023 and the equipment must be shipped by December 31, 2023. If approved by the City Council, the City will purchase the integrated components of the La Colonia Tot Lot playground equipment from GameTime, or their approved equipment supplier, at a cost not to exceed $175,000. This approach would save the City approximately $80,000.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15302 of the State CEQA Guidelines. A Notice of Exemption was filed with the San Diego County Clerk on December 1, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The anticipated project costs are listed on the following page.

Item Amount
Construction Contract – Western Rim $1,124,554
Construction Contingency (8.5%) 95,056
Construction Support – VDLA 12,000
Tot Lot Equipment Ordered by City 175,000
County DEHQ Permit for Changes to
Recycled Water Irrigation System
3,390
Total $1,410,000
The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget includes $1,410,000 for the replacement of the La Colonia Tot Lot. Funding sources for construction include General Fund ($500,000), General Fund, Measure S ($674,000), State Per Capita Grant Program ($186,000) and County Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Grant ($50,000). No additional funding is required at this time to complete construction of the project. Final project costs will be reported to the City Council after construction is finished as part of filing the Notice of Completion.

WORK PLAN:

This project is consistent with portions of Item B.2 (La Colonia Park Improvements) of the Community Character Priorities of the FY 2023/24 Work Plan.

OPTIONS:
• Adopt Staff recommendations and provide direction on alternative net climbing structure.

September 27, 2023
Award La Colonia Tot Lot Construction Contract

• Postpone contract award and provide direction to Staff. • Reject construction bids and provide alternative direction to Staff.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 2023-111:

1. Awarding a construction contract to Western Rim Constructors, Inc. totaling $1,124,554 for the La Colonia Tot Lot Replacement, Bid No. 2023-08.

2. Approving an amount of $95,056 for construction contingency.

3. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the construction contract on behalf of the City.

4. Authorizing the City Manager to approve cumulative change orders up to the construction contingency amount.

5. Authorizing the City Manager to execute any and all agreements necessary to purchase the integrated components (including alternative dome/net structure) of the La Colonia Tot Lot playground equipment from GameTime, or their approved equipment supplier, at a cost not to exceed $175,000.

6. Authorizing the City Manager to amend the PSA with Van Dyke Landscape Architects to increase the compensation by $12,000 for additional expenses incurred during design and construction support services associated with the La Colonia Tot Lot Replacement.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2023-111

2. VistaArc Orbiter dome/net climbing structure

3. GT Wave dome/net climbing structure
RESOLUTION 2023-111

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING A

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE LA COLONIA TOT
LOT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, BID NO. 2023-08, TO
WESTERN RIM CONSTRUCTORS, INC. AND APPROVING

AN AMENDMENT TO THE PSA WITH VAN DYKE

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS FOR CONSTRUCTION

SUPPORT
WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Program portion of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Adopted Budget contains an appropriation for the replacement of the La Colonia Tot Lot; and
WHEREAS, in response to an advertisement for construction bids, the City received five bids for construction of the new playground at the La Colonia Park; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 2023, the City Clerk opened the construction bids and publicly read the bids aloud.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

2. That the City Council awards a construction contract to Western Rim Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $1,124,554 for the La Colonia Tot Lot Replacement, Bid No. 2023-08.

3. That the City Council approves an amount of $95,056 for construction contingency.

4. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the construction contract on behalf of the City.

5. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to approve cumulative change orders up to the construction contingency amount.

6. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute any and all agreements necessary to purchase the integrated components of the La Colonia Tot Lot playground equipment from GameTime, or their approved equipment supplier, at a cost not to exceed $175,000.

Resolution 2023-111
Award La Colonia Tot Lot Construction

7. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager to amend the PSA with Van Dyke Landscape Architects to increase the compensation by $12,000 for additional expenses incurred during design and construction support services associated with the La Colonia Tot Lot Replacement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of September 2023, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk Model Number: 6610SP
VistaArc Orbiter
VistaArc orbiter is a multi-sided climbers designed for children to climb in, through, up, and around. Featuring our WeaveTech® ropes for maximum strength and durability, this climber is sure to be a fun and challenging addition to your park or playground. The rope structure includes GameTime's EveryBody Plays transfer platform attached to a SureGrip accessible route to the structure, followed by an exciting slide at the end! (Game"Jime)
A P LAYCORE' Company
La Colonia Park Playground- Project 105001-01-0pt 10
Solana Beach, CA
Model Number: 5916SP
GT Wave
GT Wave™ is an innovative inclusive net climbing structure from our custom play division. It is the industry's first net climber with a transfer platform attached to an accessible route leading to a six-foot zip slide. Children of all abilities experience a wide range of play adventures, as well as physical, social-emotional, and cognitive skill development.VistaRope CatalogSee the GTWave in 3D!
(Game"Jime)
A P LAYCORE' Company
La Colonia Park Project 105001-01-0pt 11
Solana Beach, CA
4884-4826-6625 v1
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.3.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager/City Attorney
SUBJECT: Discuss and Consider Introduction of Ordinance 532 Amending Solana Beach Municipal Code Chapter 3.08
Related to Purchasing
BACKGROUND:

As required by Government Code section 54202, Chapter 3.08 of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) contains guidance on the City’s procurement requirements for the purchase of goods, services, and equipment (Purchasing Ordinance). The Purchasing Ordinance regulates when formal bidding, informal bidding, or when no competitive bidding is required for the purchase of supplies, services, and equipment. The last increase to the City Manager’s purchasing authority occurred in 2015.

The cost of goods and services has substantially increased since the Purchasing Ordinance was last amended almost a decade ago. The San Diego regional consumer price index-urban consumers (CPI) has significantly increased over that time period.

The impacts of the pandemic have further hampered the City’s ability to procure goods, equipment and services in a timely manner due to lingering delays within supply chains.

As a result, Staff proposes changes to Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 to provide greater flexibility, administrative efficiencies, reduced costs, and enhanced ability to acquire goods and services in a timely manner.

At the August 23, 2023 Council Meeting, the City Council directed Staff to return with revisions to the City’s Purchasing ordinance increasing certain thresholds. The action before the City Council is to consider introducing Ordinance 532 amending SBMC Chapter 3.08.

September 27, 2023
Ordinance 532-SBMC Chapter 3.08

4884-4826-6625 v1
DISCUSSION:

The City frequently enters into contracts with all manner of consultants in carrying out City services or projects and for the purchase of supplies and equipment to effectively run the City and its operations. Establishing a clear threshold whereby the City Manager can execute a contract facilitates City business.

The cost of goods and services has substantially increased since the Purchasing Ordinance was last amended. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the Council increase the City Manager's purchasing authority from $25,000 to $50,000, and to increase the floor for the requirements of competitive bidding from $2,500 to $5,000 (ten percent of the City Manager's authority). Again, for the City Manager to execute a contract, the budget must be available for the goods or services. To the extent that the cost of the goods or services exceeds the recommended $50,000 threshold, or if funds were not available, and in those situations where the project has not been previously approved by the City Council, Staff would present the item to the City Council for approval.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The adoption of this ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a “project,” as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The introduction and adoption of the ordinance has no significant impact on the budget.

It is anticipated that there may be savings in Staff time with a more efficient and streamlined procurement process as proposed.

WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:

• Approve Staff recommendation.
• Approve Staff recommendation with alternative amendments / modifications. • Take no action.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. If desired, introduce Ordinance No. 532 amending Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) Chapter 3.08 to increase the City Manager's purchasing September 27, 2023
Ordinance 532-SBMC Chapter 3.08

4884-4826-6625 v1
authority from $25,000 to $50,000, and to revise the thresholds for procurement process.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Ordinance No. 532
ORDINANCE 532

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3,
CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE SOLANA BEACH MUNICIPAL

CODE REGARDING PURCHASING
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 54202 provides that every city “shall adopt policies and procedures, including bidding regulations, governing purchases of supplies and equipment” and that “[p]urchases of supplies and equipment by the [city] shall be in accordance with said duly adopted policies and in accordance with all provisions of law governing same;” and
WHEREAS, Chapter 3.08 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code contains procurement procedures for the purchase of goods, services, and equipment; and WHEREAS, there have been significant increases to the San Diego regional consumer price index-urban consumers (CPI) since the City’s last revision to its purchasing regulations; and
WHEREAS, the impacts of the pandemic have further hampered the City’s ability to procure goods, equipment, and services in a timely manner due to lingering delays within supply chains; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the Council increase the City Manager’s purchasing authority from $25,000 to $50,000, and to increase the floor for the requirements of competitive bidding from $2,500 to $5,000 (ten percent of the City Manager's authority); and
WHEREAS, the authority vested in the City Manager for the approval of small to medium size purchases ensures that the procurement process does not become overly cumbersome by creating undue delays in the approval process for small to medium size purchases; and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes to Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 will provide greater flexibility, administrative efficiencies, reduced costs, and enhanced ability to acquire goods and services in a timely manner.
.

The City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:

SECTION 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

SECTION 2. The adoption of the ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a “project,” as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

SECTION 3. Sections 3.08.030, 3.08.050, 3.08.060, 3.08.070, 3.08.080,

3.08.085, 3.08.095, 3.08.100, and 3.08.140 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows (underlines are additions and strikeouts are deletions)::

3.08.030 Duties and authority of the purchasing officer.

The purchasing officer shall have the authority to:

A. Negotiate, process the purchase of, and contract for all supplies, services and equipment needed by any city department or agency which derives its support wholly or in part from the city; provided however, that any single expenditure or contract in excess of $25,000 $50,000 shall require city council approval.

B. Make procurements:

1. In accordance with the purchasing procedures prescribed by this chapter; and

2. In accordance with relevant administrative policies approved by the city manager for internal control and operations management.

C. Act to procure for the city the needed supplies, equipment and services with the necessary quality, capacity, safety, performance ability and overall cost, considering labor and maintenance costs and other applicable factors required to meet the service objectives of the using department or agency at the least expense to the city.

D. Discourage collusion in bidding and discourage vendor uniform bidding; endeavor to obtain the most open competition possible on all purchases.

E. Prepare and recommend administrative regulations, including revisions and amendments thereto, governing the purchase of supplies, services and equipment for the city; said regulations shall be effective upon approval by the city manager.

F. Remain informed of current developments in the field of purchasing, prices, market conditions and new products.

G. Prescribe and maintain such forms as are reasonably necessary for the operation of this chapter and other rules and regulations.

H. Transfer between departments any unused goods and supplies within any fiscal year.

I. Sell or exchange any and all equipment, materials, fixtures and other personal property of the city having a salvage value and which is obsolete or unserviceable, or is surplus to the city, or for which replacement is to be purchased. The purchasing officer or designee may sell the same for the best price obtainable in the open market or, when he/she deems it advisable, to the highest bidder at public sale, or he/she may exchange the same for other property or for credit on other property. In the event the purchasing officer determines that any such obsolete or surplus property has no salvage value, he/she may dispose of it as he/she deems advisable in accordance with Chapter 2.52 SBMC et seq. Any employees involved in declaring property surplus, or in the sale of said property, are excluded from acquiring the surplus property in any way.

J. Prescribe, design and issue forms needed for the operation of this chapter and other applicable rules and regulations.

K. Grant authority to any department director to purchase or contract for specified supplies and equipment; but shall require that such purchases or contracts be made in conformity with purchasing procedures established in this chapter. All fiduciary duties and responsibilities of the purchasing officer are incumbent upon the department directors when acting in the capacity of purchasing officer, particularly when negotiating contracts for professional services.
.

L. Grant each department director authority to perform the duties and exercise the authority of the purchasing officer with a limit on purchases from the same vendor, purchased on the same day, to less than $2,500 $5,000 in value, except to the extent that the city manager reserves the duties and authority for himself/herself.

M. Grant a one percent advantage in the bid price to in-town vendors whenever supplies and equipment are subject to sales tax. Price alone shall not be the determining factor but shall be considered along with the other factors, including, but not limited to, the ability of the bidder to deliver, prior experience with the bidder and other factors relating to the particular needs of the city for the supplies and equipment to be purchased.

3.08.050 Use of purchase orders required and exceptions.

A. Purchase of supplies, services and equipment in excess of $2,500 $5,000 shall be made only by purchase order. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no purchase order shall be issued unless the prior approval of the purchasing officer has been obtained. SBMC 3.08.070 and 3.08.080 shall not apply to the purchase of supplies, services or equipment under the following circumstances:

1. Emergency purchases as provided in SBMC 3.08.060; or

2. Purchases from the same vendor, made on the same day, by each department, of an estimated value of less than $2,500 $5,000; or

3. Billing for utilities, and other similar payments, unless there exists maintenance or service agreements; or

4. Services provided only by another governmental agency where there exists a service agreement.

B. The purchasing officer may establish accounts with vendors for specified supplies, services and equipment. Open accounts shall be made pursuant to provisions of this chapter. The aggregate purchases under an open vendor account shall not exceed $2,500 $5,000 per transaction. The accounts shall be open at the discretion of the purchasing officer after considering risk and need.

C. Except in cases of emergency or in cases where specific authority has first been obtained from the city council, the purchasing officer shall not issue any purchase order for supplies, services and equipment unless there exists an unencumbered appropriation in the fund account against which such purchase is to be charged.

3.08.060 Emergency purchases.

The city manager or designee may make emergency purchases, not to exceed $25,000 $50,000, free of the provisions of this chapter upon a showing by any department that the purchase required is for the immediate protection of life, health, or property and there is a present, immediate and existing emergency which could not reasonably be foreseen, or to prevent or mitigate an emergency condition from occurring. Emergency purchases that exceed $25,000 $50,000 in response to conditions that endanger life, health or safety are free from the provisions of this chapter, but are required to be ratified by the city council at the soonest available regular city council meeting.

3.08.070 Informal purchasing procedures.

The purchasing officer may make purchases of supplies, equipment or services with a value of less than $25,000 $50,000 by following the informal bid procedures provided in this section:

A. Purchases of supplies, services and equipment of an estimated value of less than $25,000 $50,000 may be made by the purchasing officer in accordance with the procedures set forth in this section. The purchasing officer shall solicit informal competitive bids for all such purchases; provided, however, informal competitive bidding shall not be required for any purchase that has an estimated value of less than $2,500 $5,000.

B. Except where competitive bidding is not required, informal bids shall be solicited for purchases of supplies, services or equipment and awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, as follows:

1. The informal bids may be oral or written;

2. Whenever possible, at least three informal bids or quotations shall be obtained, and the award be given to the lowest responsible bidder;

3. The purchasing officer shall solicit informal bids or quotations from prospective responsible vendors by written request, by telephone, by public notice posted on a bulletin board in City Hall and/or by adjudicated newspaper publication;

4. The informal bid purchase shall not require city council approval; the city manager, or designee, is authorized to execute the contract for any such purchase.

3.08.080 Formal contract procedure.

Except as otherwise specifically provided in this section or in other sections of this chapter, purchases of supplies, services and equipment of an estimated value of $25,000 $50,000 or more shall be by formal sealed written competitive bids. Awards of such contracts shall be made by the city council to the lowest responsible bidder in accordance with the following provisions:

A. Notices Inviting Bids. Notices inviting bids shall include a general description of the supplies, services or equipment to be purchased. Notices shall also state where bid forms and specifications may be secured as well as the time and place for opening bids.

Notices inviting bids must be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation throughout the city at least 10 calendar days before the date of opening the bids. The notice shall be published twice, not less than five days apart per Public Contract Code Subsection 20164 of the State of California. The notice shall specify that the award shall be made to the lowest responsible bidder in accordance with SBMC 3.08.080.

B. Bidders’ Security. When considered necessary by the purchasing officer, bidders’ security may be prescribed in the notices inviting bids. Bidders shall not be entitled to the return of bid securities. The city council, on the refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, may award the contract to the next lowest responsible bidder.

C. Confidentiality of Bids. Any bid received pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall not be disclosed directly or indirectly to any other bidder until the bidding is closed and further bidding is excluded.

D. Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the city clerk or designee and shall be identified as bids on the sealed envelope. All bids submitted by the deadline shall be opened at the time and place stated in the public notice. All bids received shall be open for public inspection in the city clerk’s office during business hours for 30 days after the bid opening. Bids will be destroyed in accordance with the city’s adopted records retention schedule. The city reserves the right to confirm mathematical accuracy of the bids prior to award of the contract.

E. Rejection of Bids. The city council may, at its discretion, reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids.

F. Tie Bids. If two or more bids are received for the same total amount, quality and service being equal, and if public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the city council may accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders.

G. Contracts Exceeding Bid Amount. Change orders for contracts for the purchase of supplies, services or equipment may not exceed the bid amount by more than 25 percent.

H. Performance Bonds. The purchasing officer shall have the authority to require a performance bond before entering into a contract. The bond will be in an amount reasonably necessary to protect the best interest of the city. If a performance bond is required, the form and amount shall be described in the notice inviting bids.

I. Splitting or Separating Purchases or Contract. Contracts for the purchase of supplies, equipment or services may not be split or separated into smaller work orders for the express purpose of circumventing purchasing procedures.

J. Returning Retention Withholdings. The purchasing officer shall be required to return the required 10 percent retention withholdings in accordance with the original signed contract, or 60 calendar days after a notice of completion has been signed by the authorized department director and the authorized project coordinator, provided there are no outstanding stop orders or mechanics liens.

3.08.085 Purchase of used equipment.

If opportunities arise to purchase used equipment, such equipment may be purchased without competitive bidding, provided all the following conditions are met:

A. The equipment being sold is warranted or, in the case of an “as-is, where-is” purchase, there is an inspection by a qualified party who certifies that the condition of the item is acceptable and adequate for efficient city use.

B. The dealer of the equipment is a bona fide and reputable dealer as verified through reference checks or the equipment is being purchased from another governmental entity.
.

C. The selling price of the equipment is less than $25,000 $50,000, including tax, installation, freight, and any other additional acquisition costs.

D. If no bids are received from the formal bidding process for the purchase of used equipment with a selling price of over $25,000 $50,000, a written request to commence negotiation with a vendor(s) must be submitted to the city manager for approval.

Acceptance of the contract is subject to city council approval.

Justification for the sole source purchase of used equipment must be documented and maintained as part of the procurement file.

It is not allowable to purchase used equipment when procedures for the acquisition of new equipment have been circumvented to avoid the competitive bidding process.

3.08.095 Award and execution of contracts.

Except in emergency situations pursuant to SBMC 3.08.060, all contracts for supplies, services and equipment in an estimated amount of $25,000 $50,000, or more, shall be awarded by the city council. Contracts for supplies, services and equipment in an estimated amount of less than $25,000 $50,000shall be executed by the city manager or designee.

3.08.100 Change orders for contracts covering the purchase of supplies, services or equipment.

A. Change orders for contracts for the purchases of supplies, services and equipment may not exceed the original bid amount by more than 25 percent.

B. Change orders for an amount of less than $25,000 $50,000may be approved by the city manager if unencumbered funds are available.

C. Change orders for an amount of $25,000 $50,000or more shall require city council approval.

D. Any change order that results in the need for additional appropriation shall be approved by the city council.

3.08.140 Contracts for professional services.

Because of their unique nature, it is in the best interest of the public, as allowed by state law, that contracts for professional services such as attorneys, accountants, architects, planning consultants, computer consultants, engineers, auditors, financial advisors, public relations consultants, real estate agents and brokers, insurance and bond agents and brokers, or other professional or consultant services of a similar nature, or at the discretion of the purchasing officer, be selected on the basis of demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required, negotiated between parties rather than on the basis of cost alone.

Therefore, the city manager is not limited to awarding professional services contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, but rather on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for the types of service to be performed at a fair and reasonable price.

The procurement of professional services shall be as follows:

A. The city manager may exempt professional service contracts from the bid requirements of SBMC 3.08.070 for contracts less than $25,000 $50,000when it is necessary or convenient for the management of the city’s affairs.

B. The purchasing officer shall ascertain from informed sources the names of not less than three professionals qualified for the service desired who are professionally and financially qualified to undertake the proposed assignment. When three such professionals are not readily identifiable, the city manager may determine that a lesser number of professionals is adequate.

C. A request for proposal shall be provided to all potential candidates outlining the scope of services required, time frame for completion, pricing structure, liability insurance information and coverage and other pertinent information. Professionals must submit their responses in the specified format no later than the stated final due date for proposals.

The response must include liability insurance information and coverage.

D. The evaluation process will be based on the criteria stated in the request for proposal but will generally include the scope of services offered, the professional’s capabilities and previous experience in the field.

E. After the proposals are evaluated, the purchasing officer will negotiate an agreement with the selected professional. If an agreement is not reached within a reasonable time, the purchasing officer will terminate discussion with the first candidate and open negotiations with the second choice.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Solana Beach hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published pursuant to state law.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California held on the 27th day of September 2023, and thereafter, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, on the ___ day of ______, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
____________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________________ ___________________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk .