City Council:
Patricia Farrar-Rivas, Mayor
Ron Wellander, Vice Mayor
Jack Ding
Sandra Lowe
John Gurney
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
OF THE SONOMA CITY COUNCIL
City Council Chambers, 177 First Street West
Wednesday, June 4, 2025
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84876986131
6:00 PM Regular Meeting
ACCESSING PUBLIC MEETINGS
As a public service to the community, City Council meetings are held in-person, and viewable through a live webcast on the City’s CivicWeb Portal at https://sonomacity.civicweb.net/Portal/Video.aspx, City of Sonoma YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChZjUrg2rNLYxTgQHhFy-Tg, and televised on Comcast Cable Channel 27. Members of the public can also view the meeting via ZOOM, at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84876986131.
If a technical issue arises with Zoom video or the listening phone dial-in option, the City Council meeting will continue unless a Council Member is participating remotely pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 2449.
Members of the public who wish to address the Council by providing public comments during the meeting may do so in-person in the Council Chambers at 177 First Street West, where the meeting is being publicly held. As an alternative, members of the public may also provide written public comment submitted via the City’s online Public Comment form at https://sonomacity.civicweb.net/Portal/CitizenEngagement.aspx or by email to:
[email protected]
PROCESS FOR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: There will be two opportunities for members of the public to address items not appearing on the agenda. The early public comment period, Agenda Item 1, will be limited to ten speakers. Each speaker will be allowed up to two minutes. Speakers who do not have an opportunity to speak during the first public comment section will be allowed to make their comments during the later public comment period, Agenda Item 10, provided there were more than 10 people in the first public comment section. When the Mayor announces these agenda items, please form a line to speak.
In the event a Council Member participates remotely for just cause or an emergency circumstance under Assembly Bill 2449, the City will allow for public comment through the Zoom link.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk (707) 933-2216. Notification 48 hours before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
Be Courteous - TURN OFF your cell phones and watches while the meeting is in session.
The City Council may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on the agenda irrespective of how the items are described.
No new items will begin after 9:00pm unless a majority of the members present vote to allow the items to be heard.
Page
REGULAR MEETING
CONVENE, CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
ROLL CALL (Ding, Lowe, Gurney, Wellander, Farrar-Rivas)
1. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
At this this time members of the public may address the Council on matters not listed on this agenda, but which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council. This public comment period will be limited to ten speakers. Each speaker will be allowed up to two minutes.
Speakers who do not have an opportunity to speak during the first public comment section will be allowed to make their comments during the later public comment period, Agenda Item 10, provided there were more than 10 people in the first public comment section. When the Mayor announces these agenda items, please form a line to speak.
Under State Law, unless otherwise permitted under the Ralph M. Brown Act, the merits of the matters presented under this item cannot be discussed or acted upon by the City Council at this time. For items appearing on the agenda, the public will be invited to make comments at the time the item comes up for Council consideration. Please begin by stating your name.
2. MEETING DEDICATIONS
3. COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Committee Reports - Council Members are appointed to various boards and committees - local, county-wide and regional. Any updates from a council member will be shared at this time.
A list of all appointments is available on our City Website for easy reference.
Council Members may also make appointments to city commissions at this time.
4. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
5. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS
6. PRESENTATIONS
6.1: Proclamation Recognizing 10th Anniversary of Cancer Support Sonoma
6.2: Proclamation Proclaiming June 19, 2025, as Juneteenth Day in the City of Sonoma
Juneteenth-Proclamation
5 7. CONSENT CALENDAR – CITY COUNCIL
All items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be acted upon by a single motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Council or staff request specific items to be removed for separate action.
7.1: Waive further reading and Authorize Introduction and/or Adoption of Ordinances by Title Only. (Standard procedural action - no backup information provided)
7.2: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc. to Extend Services for Building Plan Check and As Needed Inspection Services (Jennifer Gates, AICP, Community Development Director)
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution.
Agenda Report - 4Leaf Contract Amendment - Pdf
6 - 14
7.3: Adopt a Resolution Approving Temporary Use of City Streets by Sonoma 15 - 43
Valley Vintners and Growers Alliance for the Annual Lighted Tractor Parade on Saturday, November 29, 2025 (Lisa Janson, Senior Management Analyst) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution.
Agenda Report - Lighted Tractor Parade Street Use - Pdf
8. PUBLIC HEARING
9. REGULAR CALENDAR – CITY COUNCIL
(Matters requiring discussion and/or action by the City Council)
9.1: New Priority Conservation Areas Within the City to Further Protect and Open Space Areas, Improve Urban Greening, and Provide Additional Recreation Opportunities (Jacob Dunn, Associate Planner)
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the nomination for the designation of Sonoma Creek, Fryer Creek, Nathanson Creek, and Regional Trail as a Priority Conservation Area (PCA) to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).
Agenda Report - Nomination to Designate Priority Conservation Areas - Pdf 44 - 58
9.2: Letters of Interest Received and Direction to Mayor Farrar-Rivas or Her Designee Regarding Nominations for Appointees to Regional Commissions & Committees on Behalf of the Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association of Sonoma County (Rebekah Barr, MMC, City Clerk)
RECOMMENDATION: Give direction to Mayor Farrar-Rivas or her designee regarding appointment.
Agenda Report - MCMASC Appointments - Pdf
59 - 64
10. SECOND PUBLIC COMMENT (ONLY REQUIRED IF EARLIER PUBLIC SPEAKERS
REMAIN)
At this this time members of the public who did not have the opportunity to speak during the early comment period may address the Council on matters not listed on this agenda, but which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council. Each speaker will be allowed up to two minutes. Please form a line to speak.
Under State Law, unless otherwise permitted under the Ralph M. Brown Act, the merits of the matters presented under this item cannot be discussed or acted upon by the City Council at this time. For items appearing on the agenda, the public will be invited to make comments at the time the item comes up for Council consideration. Please begin by stating your name.
11. ADJOURNMENT
I do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted as legally required. Rebekah Barr, MMC, City Clerk.
*********************************************************************************************************************************** Copies of all staff reports and documents subject to disclosure that relate to any item of business referred to on the agenda are usually available for public inspection the Wednesday before each regularly scheduled meeting at City Hall, located at No. 1 The Plaza, Sonoma CA. Any documents subject to disclosure that are provided to all, or a majority of all, of the members of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda has been distributed will be made available for inspection at the City Clerk’s office, No. 1 The Plaza, Sonoma CA during regular business hours. If you challenge the action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on the agenda or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk (707) 933-2216. Notification 48 hours before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
City of Sonoma's Commission and Committee Roster: 2024 Commission _ Committees Roster 12.19.2024 Appointments to Commission/Committees: The Council may establish and make appointments to a Council committee (made up of two Council Members) with respect to any item appearing on this agenda.
Closed Session: If action is taken during a Closed Session meeting that is required to be reported out at this meeting, the Council will return to Open Session and report out immediately. However, if the Council is unable to do so due to time constraints, it will report out at the immediately following Regular Council Meeting under "REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION".
Motion for Consideration: A Council Member voting with the majority on any item appearing on this agenda may move for reconsideration of that vote provided the motion is in conformance with the rules adopted by the Council governing such motions.
Agenda Item #6.2:
City of Sonoma
Agenda Item Summary
Meeting: City Council - 04 Jun 2025
Department
Community Development
Department
Staff Contact
Jennifer Gates, AICP
Community Development Director
Agenda Item Title
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc. to Extend Services for Building Plan Check and As Needed Inspection Services
Summary
On December 20, 2023, the City Council approved a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc. to provide building official, building permit plan check and inspection services in the amount not to exceed $100,000 through June 30, 2024. On March 20, 2024, the City Council authorized an amendment to increase the contract amount to $175,000 to provide plan check inspector services full time. On June 19, 2024, the contract was amended again to increase the contract amount to $275,000 and the contract length through June 30, 2025. The building inspector and building official positions were filled in FY24-25, however the department still has a vacant position for the Plan Check Examiner position. Staff is recommending extending these services through June 30, 2026 with an additional budget of $100,000, for a total not to exceed budget of $375,000.
Building plan services are primarily covered by building permit fees. Any difference between City fees and consultant costs will be covered by salary savings.
Recommended Council Action
Approve City Council Resolution authorizing the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, to execute a Third Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc. to provide building official, building permit plan check and inspection services in the amount not to exceed $375,000 through June 30, 2026.
Alternative Actions
Council discretion.
Financial Impact
The Agreement costs will be provided by permit fees and salary savings.
Environmental Review Status
Environmental Impact Report
Negative Declaration
Exempt
Not Applicable
Approved/Certified
No Action Required
Action Requested
Agenda Item #7.2:
Attachments
Resolution 4LEAF PSA 3rd Amendment
4LEAF PSA 3rd Amendment
Agenda Item #7.2:
City of Sonoma
RESOLUTION # _______ - 2025
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SONOMA AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH 4LEAF, INC. TO PROVIDE AS NEEDED BUILDING PERMIT PLANCHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 WHEREAS, the City of Sonoma (“the City”) requires a qualified Building Official to serve as the City’s Interim Building Official while an active recruitment is occurring; and WHEREAS, the City also needs assistance with building plan check review and inspection services; and
WHEREAS, for development projects, per the City’s fee schedule, consultant costs for plan checks and inspections shall be passed through the applicant as applicable; and WHEREAS, the City circulated a Request for Proposals and Qualifications for Interim Building Official and On-call Building Division Consulting Services from September 25, 2023, to October 20, 2023, and received six responses for the Interim Building Official position; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with 4LEAF on December 20, 2023, in the amount not to exceed $100,000 through June 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with 4LEAF on March 20, 2024, in the amount not to exceed $175,000 through June 30, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with 4LEAF on June 19, 2024, in the amount not to exceed $275,000 through June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to continue the services provided by 4LEAF, therefore requiring a third amendment to the compensation for and term of the Professional Services Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a third amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc. to provide services in the amount not to exceed $375,000 through June 30, 2026.
RESOLVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June 2025 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Patricia Farrar-Rivas, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Rebekah Barr, MMC, City Clerk
Agenda Item #7.2:
CITY OF SONOMA
THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITY OF SONOMA & 4LEAF, INC.
THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT is entered into as of the ____ day of _____________, 2025, by and between the CITY OF SONOMA herein called the “City,” and 4LEAF, INC, herein called the “Consultant.”
Recitals
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into an Agreement for Building Services dated January 3, 2024 for a not-to-exceed Agreement amount of $100,000 (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Parties amended the Agreement on March 20,2024 to increase the not-to-exceed Agreement amount to $175,000; and
WHEREAS, the Parties amended the Agreement a second time on June 19, 2024 to increase the not-to-exceed Agreement amount to $275,000 and to provide services through June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Agreement to continue the services and to increase the amount Agreement amount by $100,000 for a not-to-exceed Agreement amount of $375,000 and to extend the term of the Agreement for services through June 30, 2026.
Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, the City and Consultant agree to amend Sections 2 and 4(A) as follows:
2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon receipt of a written notice to proceed from City, but in no event prior to receiving a fully executed agreement from City and obtaining and delivering the required insurance coverage, and satisfactory evidence thereof, to City. Consultant shall begin performance of its services not later than January 9, 2023 and complete its services not later than June 30, 2026.
Any changes to these dates must be approved in writing by the City Manager or his or her representatives.
4. Compensation and Method of Payment.
A. Compensation. The compensation to be paid to Consultant, including both payment for professional services and reimbursable expenses, shall be at the rate and schedules more particularly described in Exhibit A, in accordance with the terms and conditions included therein. However, in no event shall the amount City pays to Consultant exceed Three Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($375,000).
Agenda Item #7.2:
City’s obligation to pay compensation to Consultant as provided herein is contingent upon Consultant’s compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and f waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment.
Except as modified herein, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement on the dates set forth below. “City”
City of Sonoma
By:
______________________________
[Name, Title]
Date: _______________
Attest:
By:
______________________________
Rebekah Barr, City Clerk
Date: _______________
Approved as to form:
By:
______________________________
David J. Ruderman, City Attorney
Date: _______________
“Consultant”
[Name of Company or Individual]
By:______________________________
[Name, Title]
Date: __________________
By:______________________________
[Name, Title]
Date: __________________
Agenda Item #7.2:
Fee Schedule May 21, 2025
FEE SCHEDULE
FY2025-2026 FEE SCHEDULE & BASIS OF CHARGES
FOR THE CITY OF SONOMA
All Rates are Subject to Basis of Charges
PLAN REVIEW COST STRUCTURE NOTES
Plan Review Percentage: 70%
(Inclusive of all disciplines except Fire and Civil which are billed on an hourly basis)
Hourly Plan Review: $144 Non-Structural Review
$164 Structural Review
Fee includes:
Initial review and two (2) rechecks. Hourly
charges apply after three (3) or more
rechecks.
Shipping, courier, and electronic service.
Building
Chief Building Official ......................................................................................................................... $159/hour Structural Plan Review Engineer ........................................................................................................ $164/hour Non-Structural Plans Examiner .......................................................................................................... $144/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Inspector ...................................................................................... $169/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Plans Examiner............................................................................. $169/hour Senior Combination Building Inspector (Building Inspector III) ......................................................... $124/hour Commercial Building Inspector (Building Inspector II) ...................................................................... $109/hour Residential Building Inspector (Building Inspector I).......................................................................... $99/hour Permit Manager.................................................................................................................................. $99/hour Senior Permit Technician.................................................................................................................... $84/hour Permit Technician............................................................................................................................... $74/hour Clerk/Administrator............................................................................................................................ $64/hour Civil Plan Review (Grading, Improvement Plans) ............................................................................... $179/hour Inspector of Record ............................................................................................................................ $139/hour DSA Class 1 / OSHPD A Inspector ....................................................................................................... $179/hour DSA Class 2 / OSHPD B Inspector ....................................................................................................... $149/hour DSA Class 3 / OSHPD C Inspector........................................................................................................ $107/hour GoFormz Software.................................................................................................................. $50/user monthly Code Enforcement
Code Enforcement Director.............................................................................................................. $149/hour Code Enforcement Manager ............................................................................................................ $139/hour Senior Code Enforcement Officer..................................................................................................... $109/hour Code Enforcement Officer II............................................................................................................. $99/hour Code Enforcement Officer I.............................................................................................................. $89/hour Agenda Item #7.2:
Fee Schedule May 21, 2025
Fire
Fire Protection Engineer (FPE)............................................................................................................$209/hour Fire Prevention Officer ......................................................................................................................$144/hour Fire Plans Examiner ............................................................................................................................$149/hour Fire Inspector II...................................................................................................................................$174/hour Fire Inspector I....................................................................................................................................$164/hour Planning
Housing Policy Director ....................................................................................................................$209/hour Planning Director..............................................................................................................................$184/hour Principal/Planning Manager.............................................................................................................$169/hour Senior Planner ..................................................................................................................................$144/hour Associate Planner.............................................................................................................................$129/hour Assistant Planner .............................................................................................................................$109/hour Planning Technician..........................................................................................................................$94/hour Project Management
Project Manager.................................................................................................................................$184/hour Principal-in-Charge .............................................................................................................................$249/hour Engineering, Public Works Inspection, & Construction Management (Prevailing Wage) Civil Plan Review (Grading, Improvement Plans) ................................................................................ $179/hour Traffic Engineer.................................................................................................................................... $234/hour Construction Manager…………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….……. $166/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Inspector (Regular time) …………………………………………………….…….. $169/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Inspector (Nighttime) ……………………………………………………….…….… $190/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Inspector (Overtime)…………………………………………………………….…… $227/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Plans Examiner…………………………………………………………….……..…….. $169/hour Public Works Inspector (Regular Time) ……………………………………………………………………………………..…… $157/hour Public Works Inspector (Nighttime)…………………………………………………………………………………………..…….$176/hour Public Works Inspector (Overtime) …………………………………………………………………….……………..………..…$211/hour Public Works Inspector Apprentice………………………………………………………………………………...……………… $103/hour
BASIS OF CHARGES
Rates are inclusive of “tools of the trade” such as forms, telephones, and consumables. • All invoicing will be submitted monthly.
• Staff Augmentation work (excluding plan review) is subject to 4-hour minimum charges unless stated otherwise. Services billed in 4-hour increments.
• Most plan reviews will be done in 10 business days or less and 5 business days or less for re-checks. This is not inclusive of holidays or the day of the pick-up of plans. • Expedited reviews will be billed at 1.5x the plan review fee listed in the fee schedule. Return time will be within seven (7) days of receipt of the plans from the City. • Plan review of deferred submittals & revisions will be billed at the hourly rates listed.
Agenda Item #7.2:
Fee Schedule May 21, 2025
• All plan review services will be subject to a $308.00 minimum fee if percentage-based fee or 2-hour minimum charge if hourly rates apply.
• Larger complex plan reviews can be negotiated to achieve the best possible pricing. • All plan review services will be subject to 2-hour minimum fee. • All plan review services are billed on a percentage basis and includes the initial review and 2 rechecks. - Plan reviews will be billed on an hourly basis only after the initial review and 2 rechecks unless otherwise agreed upon on a case-by-case basis.
- Fire and Civil Reviews are billed on an hourly basis and are not included in our plan review percentage.
• 4LEAF assumes that these rates reflect the FY2025-2026 contract period. There will be a 3% escalation for FY2026-2027, FY2027-2028, etc.
• Overtime and Premium time will be charged as follows:
- Regular time (work begun after 5AM or before 4PM) 1 x hourly rate - Nighttime (work begun after 4PM or before 5AM) 1.125 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8-hour M-F or Saturdays) 1.5 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sat or 1st 8-hour Sun) 2 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sun or Holidays) 3 x hourly rate • Overtime will only be billed with prior authorization of the Director or other designated City personnel. • All work with less than 8 hours rest between shifts will be charged the appropriate overtime rate. • Mileage driven during the course of Inspections will be charged at cost plus 20%. • Payment due on receipt. All payments over 30 days will be assessed a 1.5% interest charge. • Client shall pay attorneys’ fees, or other costs incurred in collecting delinquent amounts. • Client agrees that 4LEAF’s liability will be limited to the value of services provided. • In accordance with California’s Meal Break and Rest Break Law requirements, Client will be billed one (1) additional hour per day at the regular rate for each missed meal or rest break due to Client-directed tasks or requirements. Client should allow 4LEAF’s non-exempt, hourly employees the opportunity to take their entitled rest and meal breaks during each work shift.
BASIS OF CHARGES – PREVAILING WAGE • Rates shown assume the projects will require compliance with California Prevailing Wage rate requirements and assumes the Client will be filing a PWC-100 Form to the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) for the projects.
• Rates for prevailing wage categories are subject to annual escalations in accordance with the bi-annual wage determinations from the California DIR.
• Per the new requirements being enforced under SB 854 and because it is assumed that a PWC-100 Form will be filed by the Client to the CA DIR for each project, 4LEAF is required to notify an authorized Apprenticeship Committee through submittal of a DAS-140 form. We are then required to make an official request to an authorized Apprenticeship Committee for an apprentice by submitting a DAS-142 form. We are not assured the apprenticeship committee will be able to provide a suitable / qualified apprentice for the project. Per the apprenticeship requirements, the hours worked by the apprentice must be in a ratio of 1:5 for apprentice to journeyman hours. 4LEAF will not know the labor classification of the Public Works Apprentice until an Apprentice is dispatched to the site; therefore, the rates for the Agenda Item #7.2:
Fee Schedule May 21, 2025
five Periods listed under the California DIR’s Wage determination for Building Construction Inspector were used to determine the range of hourly rates for Public Works Inspector Apprentice. • Pre-approved Overtime and Premium hours for labor categories subject to Prevailing Wage requirements will be charged per the following:
- Nighttime (work begun after 4PM or before 5AM) 1.125 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hour M-F or Saturdays) 1.5 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sat or 1st 8 hour Sun) 2 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sun or Holidays) 3 x hourly rate • All invoicing will be submitted monthly.
• All work with less than 8 hours rest between shifts will be charged the appropriate overtime rate. • Project-related mileage for inspections will be billed at the allowable IRS Rate. • Payment due on receipt. All payments over 30 days will be assessed a 1.5% interest charge. • Client shall pay attorneys’ fees, or other costs incurred in collecting delinquent amounts. • Client agrees that 4LEAF’s liability will be limited to the value of services provided. • In accordance with California’s Meal Break and Rest Break Law requirements, Client will be billed one (1) additional hour per day at the regular rate for each missed meal or rest break due to Client-directed tasks or requirements. Client should allow 4LEAF’s non-exempt, hourly employees the opportunity to take their entitled rest and meal breaks during each work shift.
Agenda Item #7.2:
City of Sonoma
Agenda Item Summary
Meeting: City Council - 04 Jun 2025
Department
Administration
Staff Contact
Lisa Janson, Senior Management Analyst
Agenda Item Title
Adopt a Resolution Approving Temporary Use of City Streets by Sonoma Valley Vintners and Growers Alliance for the Annual Lighted Tractor Parade on Saturday, November 29, 2025 Summary
The Sonoma Valley Vintners and Growers Alliance (SVVGA) is requesting approval to host the Lighted Tractor Parade on Saturday, November 29, 2025, in downtown Sonoma. This popular and growing community event celebrates Sonoma Valley’s agricultural heritage and the grape harvest season. The parade is a separately scheduled component from the long-established Valley of the Moon Vintage Festival, which SVVGA also coordinates as part of their heritage event programming.
The 2025 parade also commemorates the 200th anniversary of the first harvest in Sonoma Valley, further emphasizing the region’s cultural and historical significance.
The event proposal includes temporary street closures surrounding the Plaza for approximately 60 to 70 minutes to accommodate parade operations and enhance spectator safety.
BACKGROUND
Heritage Status: The Valley of the Moon Vintage Festival is designated as a heritage event under the City of Sonoma’s Recreation and Community Services Program Funding and Policy Guidelines. It is eligible for special event fee waivers in recognition of its cultural significance and community impact.
Parade History: In 2023, SVVGA reintroduced a themed lighted parade (formerly the "Get Your Glow On Parade") under the new name “Lighted Tractor Parade,” successfully drawing nearly 40 entries from the local agricultural and business community.
Community Benefit: The event supports local tourism, highlights the contributions of Sonoma’s farming community, and fosters civic pride through a family-friendly, visually engaging experience.
EVENT LOGISTICS
Date & Time: Saturday, November 29, 2025
Parade Duration: 6:30 PM – 7:40 PM
Estimated Duration of Street Closures: Approximately 60–70 minutes Expected Entries: 40+ illuminated tractors, floats, and vehicles Spectator Enhancements: Designated viewing areas along the Plaza for public safety and improved event experience
Agenda Item #7.3:
Proposed Street Closures:
Street Segment Closure Time
1st St West (Depot Park Lot to Spain St) 6:30 PM – 7:40 PM Spain St (1st St West to 1st St East) 6:30 PM – 7:40 PM 1st St East (Spain to E. Napa St) 6:30 PM – 7:30 PM
E. Napa St (1st St East to 1st St West) 6:30 PM – 7:30 PM 1st St West (W. Napa St to Depot Park Lot) 6:30 PM – 7:30 PM Parking Impacts:
o Temporary no-parking zones on both Plaza-side and merchant-side of Spain Street center block and First Street East
o Public notices will be distributed to inform residents and merchants of restrictions and traffic detours
REVIEW AND CONDITIONS
The Special Events Committee, including representatives from the Sonoma Police Department, Sonoma Valley Fire District, Public Works, Parks, and the City Manager’s Office, reviewed the street use application and supported the event plan, subject to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to Caltrans Conditions: Compliance with all terms regarding restricted passage of State Route 12.
2. Traffic Coordination: Coordination with Sonoma Police Department, CHP, and Sonoma County Sheriff's Office.
3. Parade Monitors: Organizer to provide adequately trained parade monitors.
4. Onsite Contact Information: Contact information for event management must be shared with public safety personnel.
5. Barricade Requests: Written request for barricades to Public Works no later than 30 days before the event.
6. Pre-Event Coordination Meeting: Organizer must schedule a walk-through with Streets Supervisor, Police Department, and Special Events Manager two weeks before the event.
7. Community Notification: Organizer must provide notice of street closures to businesses and residents at least 30 days in advance.
8. Insurance: Organizer must meet City of Sonoma’s standard insurance requirements.
9. Caltrans Permits: The applicant is responsible for obtaining any required permits from Caltrans for use of State Route 12.
PUBLIC CONTACT
Mrs. Taylor Serres, the organizer of this event, has worked closely with City departments and has demonstrated a willingness to comply with recommendations. Public outreach for affected residents and businesses will be conducted by the organizer, with staff oversight.
Recommended Council Action
Approve the street closures and authorize the SVVGA to proceed with planning and execution of the 2025 Lighted Tractor Parade, subject to the conditions outlined by the Special Events Committee.
Agenda Item #7.3:
Alternative Actions
City Council discretion.
Financial Impact
As a designated heritage event, this event qualifies for a waiver of special event fees under the City’s Recreation and Community Services Program. Any additional costs associated with police or public works services not covered under the waiver will be the responsibility of the applicant.
Environmental Review Status
Environmental Impact Report
Negative Declaration
Exempt
Not Applicable
Approved/Certified
No Action Required
Action Requested
Attachments
Lighted Tractor Parade Resolution
Tractor Parade Plaza Use Application with Street Use 2025 Agenda Item #7.3:
City of Sonoma
RESOLUTION # - 2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SONOMA APPROVING
AND CONSENTING TO THE USE OF CITY STREETS FOR THE LIGHTED TRACTOR PARADE ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2025
WHEREAS, Sonoma Valley Vintners and Growers Alliance has submitted an application to conduct the Lighted Tractor Parade, which will involve use of State Route 12; and WHEREAS, the Lighted Tractor Parade, scheduled for November 29, 2025, will temporarily impede and restrict the free passage of traffic on State Route 12 between Broadway and Second Street West between the hours of 6:30PM-7:40PM.
NOW THEREFORE BE IS RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Sonoma as follows:
1. The City Council approves and consents to the street closure associated with the proposed Lighted Tractor Parade and recommends approval of and consents to the proposed restriction of State Route 12 upon terms and conditions deemed appropriate and necessary by the State of California, Department of Transportation.
2. The approval of the street closure is subject to the following conditions and limitations:
A. Applicant shall contact the Police Department and California Highway Patrol as soon as possible to finalize traffic control plan and contract with the Sonoma County Sherriff’s Department for services as required.
B. Applicant shall provide a written request for special barricading to the Public Works Department at least thirty days prior to the event and meet with the Street Supervisor, Police Departments and Special Events Manager two weeks prior to the event.
C. Applicant shall provide notice of the event and the street closure to all businesses located on First Street East and West (between Spain and the Napa Streets, down Broadway to Patten Street and on all sides of Plaza no later than thirty days prior to the event.
D. Applicant shall comply with City of Sonoma standard insurance requirements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following traffic and parking restrictions necessary to conduct the parade are hereby approved.
1. No parking on the Plaza side of the street on Spain Street between 1st Street East and 1 st Street West between 5pm until the conclusion of the parade.
2. No parking on the Merchant side of the street on East Spain Street in front of the Sonoma Barracks (from mid-block to 1st Street East) between 5PM until the conclusion of the parade.
3. Traffic will be detoured from State Route 12 at Napa Road, Leveroni Road, MacArthur Street and Andrieux Street and State Route 12 will be closed from Andrieux/Patten Street from 6:00PM until conclusion of the parade.
Agenda Item #7.3:
PASSED, RESOLVED, AND ADOPTED, at a Regular Meeting of the City of Sonoma City Council on this 4th day of June 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_________________________
Patricia Farrar-Rivas, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Rebekah Barr, MMC, City Clerk
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
Agenda Item #7.3:
City of Sonoma
Agenda Item Summary
Meeting: City Council - 04 Jun 2025
Department
Community Development Department
Staff Contact
Jacob Dunn, Associate Planner
Agenda Item Title
New Priority Conservation Areas Within the City to Further Protect and Open Space Areas, Improve Urban Greening, and Provide Additional Recreation Opportunities Summary
Priority Conservation Areas (PCA’s) are designated geographic areas identified to support the Bay Area’s regional conservation, resilience, and sustainability objectives. First introduced in 2007, the PCA program was updated in 2024 to ensure improved alignment with regional planning and funding opportunities. PCA’s are characterized as one or more types in accordance with Attachment E:
Natural Lands
Agricultural & Working Lands
Urban Greening
Recreation
Climate Adaptation (must overlap with one other PCA type) The PCA designation encourages the preservation or enhancement of areas with high conservation values or needs. The PCA nomination process is locally driven, while designating PCA’s depends on predefined priority areas determined by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) as seen in Attachment C. PCAs are voluntary designations, and do not take precedence over local control.
Under Government Code section 65080, subdivision (b)(2)(K), a sustainable communities’ strategy (Plan Bay Area) does not supersede a city’s land use authority.
Staff reviewed the mapped eligibility areas (Attachment C) and used these predefined priority areas to identify and propose Priority Conservation Areas (Attachment B) based on local priorities and comments received through the general plan update process to date. Meetings were held with ABAG/MTC to determine qualifying PCAs under Attachment D and staff is confident that the proposed PCAs will serve the needs of the community and meet the objectives of the City of Sonoma General Plan. If the City Council nominates the proposed PCAs, staff will submit to ABAG/MTC for designation allowing the City to be eligible for the PCA Grant Program, which provides funding for acquisition, restoration, and public access improvements.
Analysis of Proposed New PCA’s
Proposed PCA Name: Sonoma Creek PCA
Location: From Ramon Street to Smith Street
Type(s): Urban Greening, Recreation, and Climate Adaptation Agenda Item #9.1:
Justification and Eligibility
Sonoma Creek is a major waterway of Sonoma Valley, which forms the City’s western boundary and provides a vital wildlife link for the region. The creek system has residential and commercial uses which border it and has potential for public access opportunities. The creek is entirely daylit with riparian vegetation throughout its course. The creek provides an ideal ecosystem for plants and animals within the Valley and can be further protected and enhanced. The Sonoma Creek watershed spans into many other tributaries and supports freshwater wetlands and saltwater marshes in the region. Improvements to the Sonoma Creek PCA could create new and enhanced trails with urban greenways that provide additional recreational access to potential trails and viable alternative transportation routes. Designating this PCA aligns with goals CD-5.3, ER-2.3, ER-2.4, and ER-2.6 (Attachment F), and the open space and recreation sections of the City of Sonoma General Plan Community Development and Environmental Resources Element.
Proposed PCA Name: Regional Trail PCA
Location: From Sonoma Highway to Lovall Valley Road
Type(s): Urban Greening, Recreation, and Climate Adaptation Justification and Eligibility
The Regional Trail serves as a multimodal trail for local community members and passing regional users. The trail provides safety for pedestrians and bikers as they pass through open spaces and public lands. The trail features multiple parks and access to residences that may utilize the trail regularly. The trail is also tied to historic parks, including Sonoma State Historic Park and Depot Park. The open spaces provide opportunities for gathering and recreation. This PCA would provide opportunities for the City to provide additional recreational access and further connectivity with other trails and the community. This would improve the safety of the trail and make the trail more appealing for users. The trail also holds potential for new urban greening due to multiple public spaces being along the trail.
Designating this PCA could improve the quality of the experience when utilizing the trail and improve the climate of the City. The designation aligns with goals CD-5.3, ER-2.3, ER2.4, and ER-2.6 (Attachment F), and the open space and recreation section of the City of Sonoma General Plan Community Development and Environmental Resources Element.
Proposed PCA Name: Nathanson Creek PCA
Location: From Plum Tree Court to Napa Road
Type(s): Urban Greening and Climate Adaptation
Justification and Eligibility
Nathanson Creek is a minor waterway within the City of Sonoma, which meanders through residential properties and some public spaces. The creek system has primarily residential uses bordering it, which have been highly developed. The creek is primarily daylit with riparian vegetation along most of the creek. The creek feeds into a wetland and some small ponds, which are highly vegetated. Improvements have been made to City roads to improve the quality of the creek and further protections may be made to protect its health.
This PCA would provide opportunities for the City to provide urban greening areas that serve the health of the creek and the climate within the City. Improvements to the Nathanson Creek PCA could improve the creek’s health and ensure viability of vegetation.
This would help to reduce the heat index within the City and improve the health of the environment. Designating this PCA aligns with goals CD-5.3, ER-2.3, ER-2.4, and ER-2.6 (Attachment F), and the open space section of the City of Sonoma General Plan Community Development and Environmental Resources Element.
Agenda Item #9.1:
Proposed PCA Name: Fryer Creek PCA
Location: From Bettencourt Street to Leveroni Road
Type(s): Recreation and Climate Adaptation
Justification and Eligibility
Fryer Creek is a minor waterway within the City of Sonoma, which meanders through residential properties and some public spaces. The creek system has primarily residential uses bordering it, allowing localized access for residents. The creek is primarily daylit with riparian vegetation along most of the creek and features a trail system along a portion of it. Improvements have been made to the bank of the creek to provide recreational opportunities and access to urban green spaces. This PCA would provide opportunities for the City to provide additional recreational opportunities for residents and serve the health of the creek and the climate within the City. Improvements to the Fryer Creek PCA could improve the creek’s health and ensure viability of vegetation. The creek would become more favorable for recreational use and provide a safe route for pedestrians. Designating this PCA aligns with goal CD-5.3, and ER-2.4 (Attachment F) and the open space and recreation section of the City of Sonoma General Plan Community Development and Environmental Resources Element.
Recommended Council Action
Staff recommend that the City of Sonoma City Council approve a Resolution approving the nomination for the designation of Sonoma Creek, Fryer Creek, Nathanson Creek, and Regional Trail as a Priority Conservation Area (PCA) to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).
Alternative Actions
Council Discretion
Financial Impact
No financial impact. Designation would allow the City to be eligible for future PCA grants.
Environmental Review Status
Environmental Impact Report
Negative Declaration
Exempt
Not Applicable
Approved/Certified
No Action Required
Action Requested
Attachments
Attachment A - Resolution
Attachment B - Newly Nominated PCA Boundary Map
Attachment C - PCA Eligibility Maps
Attachment D - PCA Eligibility Criteria
Attachment E - Priority Conservation Area Types - Definition, Objectives, Datasets and Benefits
Attachment F - General Plan Goals
Agenda Item #9.1:
City of Sonoma
RESOLUTION # ________- 2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SONOMA TO NOMINATE FOUR
PRIORITY CONSERVATION AREAS AND AUTHORIZE SUBMISSION TO THE ASSOCIATION OF
BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS
WHEREAS, The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) has updated the Priority Conservation Area (PCA) planning framework which creates a regionally consistent approach to designate key areas for conservation and nature-based improvements; and
WHEREAS, the PCA planning framework includes locally nominated PCA’s as locations to coordinate local and regional planning for the conservation of regionally significant areas which are adopted by the ABAG; and
WHEREAS, the PCA designation provides opportunities for grant funding to support conservation, restoration, and recreational projects, helping to achieve both local and regional conservation goals; and WHEREAS, Sonoma Creek contains a key wildlife corridor, urban green space, and recreational opportunities that contributes to the ecological, recreational, and climate resilience needs of the City of Sonoma and the greater Bay Area; and
WHEREAS, Nathanson Creek contains a key urban green space that contributes to the ecological, and climate resilience needs of the City of Sonoma and the greater Bay Area; and WHEREAS, Regional Trail contains a key urban green space, and recreational space that contributes to the ecological, recreational, and climate resilience needs of the City of Sonoma and the greater Bay Area; and
WHEREAS, Fryer Creek contains a key wildlife corridor, urban green space, and recreational space that contributes to the ecological, recreational, and climate resilience needs of the City of Sonoma and the greater Bay Area; and
WHEREAS, the designation of Sonoma Creek, Nathanson Creek, Regional Trail, and Fryer Creek as Priority Conservation Areas does not alter existing land use designations, zoning, or the local jurisdiction’s land use authority; and
WHEREAS, Staff submitted draft Priority Conservation Areas for nomination in accordance with eligibility requirements on May 2, 2025; and
WHEREAS, Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments reviewed the submitted nominations on May 16, 2025 and confirmed eligibility; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sonoma recognizes the importance of nominating Sonoma Creek, Nathanson Creek, Regional Trail, and Fryer Creek to ensure eligibility for future funding and support for projects that enhance the area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Sonoma hereby:
Agenda Item #9.1:
1. Endorses the nomination of Sonoma Creek PCA, Nathanson Creek PCA, Regional Trail PCA, and Fryer Creek PCA as Priority Conservation Areas to be adopted by the Association of Bay Area Governments, recognizing their regional and local significance; and
2. Authorizes staff to complete and submit the required PCA nomination form and any supporting materials to MTC/ABAG.
PASSED, RESOLVED, AND ADOPTED, at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Sonoma on this 4th day of June 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Patricia Farrar-Rivas, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Rebekah Barr, MMC, City Clerk
Agenda Item #9.1:
Attachment A
Newly Nominated PCA Boundary Map
Agenda Item #9.1:
PCA Eligibility Maps
Figure 1: Climate Adaptation PCA Eligibility (Must be Paired with another Eligible Area) Agenda Item #9.1:
Figure 2: Natural Land PCA Eligibility
Agenda Item #9.1:
Figure 3: Recreation PCA Eligibility
Agenda Item #9.1:
Figure 4: Urban Greening PCA Eligibility
Agenda Item #9.1:
Priority Conservation Area Program
2025 Nomination Cycle
1 PCA Nomination Considerations: Eligibility
Criteria and Prioritizing Nominations
PCA Eligibility Criteria
Priority Conservation Areas (PCAs) nominations and amendments must meet the location-based criteria outlined in the table below, which vary by PCA type. Use the PCA GIS Nomination Tool to submit PCA boundaries and provide supporting details for review. ABAG/MTC staff will assist throughout the nomination window, helping jurisdictions confirm compliance and offering guidance to address any gaps.
In addition to the criteria outlined in the table below, PCA nominations cannot overlap with existing PCAs. If there is a strong desire for a new PCA to cover an area with an existing PCA, the existing PCA must be amended so there is no overlap.
Please note that jurisdictions submitting PCA nominations encompassing more than 50% of their total jurisdiction’s area are required to provide a written justification explaining the rationale for proposing such a large Priority Conservation Area.
Visit MTC’S GIS data catalog to review city limits and urban growth boundaries which are mapping layers that inform eligibility. For information on how eligibility maps were developed for each PCA type, visit the PCA Refresh GitHub methodology website.
Table 1: Geographic Requirements by PCA Type
PCA Type Location Requirement Coverage
Requirement Additional Notes
Natural Land 100% outside city limits or
urban growth boundaries
75% coverage
with eligibility map
Along the bay shoreline, some special
habitats inside city limits are eligible if
100% coverage with the eligibility map
is met.
Working
Land
100% outside city limits or
urban growth boundaries
75% coverage
with eligibility map
Urban
Greening
100% inside city limits or
urban growth boundaries
75% coverage
with eligibility map
Recreation
Can exist inside or outside
city limits or urban growth
boundaries
75% coverage
with eligibility map
Climate
Adaptation
Can exist inside or outside
city limits or urban growth
boundaries
75% coverage
with eligibility map
Must also be nominated as another
PCA type; cannot exist alone.
Agenda Item #9.1:
2 Considerations for Prioritizing Nominations
Most of the Bay Area meets the eligibility criteria for PCA designation – this was a feature of the PCA Refresh, ensuring local flexibility to nominate most areas. This section offers suggested approaches for prioritizing PCA nominations. Relevant mapping layers are available on the Online Map Viewer.
1. Local Needs and Priorities
• Focus on Equity Priority Communities (EPCs): Prioritize new PCAs in or near EPCs to address social and environmental inequities. Remember to check PCA type and eligibility when nominating areas inside city limits or urban growth boundaries.
• Engage the Community: Leverage past or new community, stakeholder, or CBO engagement to identify areas that reflect community values and needs. • Advance Local Plans: Review existing plans and policies to connect PCA nominations to local conservation and development objectives.
2. Highest-Value Conservation Areas
• Identify the Highest Value and Opportunity Locations: Broad eligibility criteria allow flexibility for local nominations, but nominating all eligible areas can defuse the focus of PCAs. Instead, use data or local knowledge to target areas with the highest conservation value or highest opportunity.
3. Regional Significance
• Review Regionally Identified Priorities. ABAG created Regionally Identified Priorities, or "Regionally Identified PCAs," during the PCA Refresh process to pinpoint lands with regional connectivity or significance for each PCA type. These areas serve the same planning and policy purposes as Locally Nominated PCAs but do not qualify for grant funding unless they are also locally nominated (learn more about Regionally Identified PCAs in the PCA Refresh Final Report, page 16). While Regionally Identified PCAs can help guide the nomination of new PCAs, their absence does not preclude an area from being nominated. View Regionally Identified PCAs in the Online Map Viewer to strategically align local nominations with regional goals. Jurisdictions are encouraged to nominate Regionally Identified PCAs when in agreement with local priorities.
4. Multi-Benefit Opportunities
• Consider Areas that Advance Multiple Goals: Many locations meet criteria for multiple PCA types (e.g. a local stream may be a critical habitat, trail gap, park desert, and flood risk area). Prioritize areas that achieve multiple PCA conservation goals to maximize co-benefits like biodiversity, climate resilience, recreation, community health, and equity.
• Enhance Connectivity: Support nominations that link regionally significant habitat corridors and recreation networks.
Priority Conservation Area Program
2025 Nomination Cycle
Agenda Item #9.1:
Priority Conservation Area Types: Definition, Objectives, Datasets and Benefits Natural Lands (NL)
Areas critical to the functioning of wildlife and plant habitats, aquatic ecosystems and the region’s water supply and quality.
• Natural Lands Objective 1 – Protect a full representation of the Bay Area’s habitats in robust amounts to ensure long-term resilience of the region’s biodiversity. o Datasets: Essential Lands (CLN 2.0), Resilience Sites (TNC), Areas of Conservation Emphasis (CDFW).
• Natural Lands Objective 2 – Enhance watersheds including priority stream corridors, wetlands, and groundwater recharge areas.
o Datasets: Stream Conservation Targets (CLN 2.0), Soil Agricultural Groundwater Banking Index (UC Davis), Marsh Suitability/Polder Management/Tidal Marsh (SFEI), Fish Passage Assessment Database (Caltrans).
• Natural Lands Objective 3 – Maintain and enhance wildlife corridors and habitat connectivity. o Datasets: Bay Area Critical Linkages (CLN 2.0), Wildlife Movement Barrier Priorities (CDFW).
Primary benefits
• Terrestrial & aquatic ecosystem health
• Water supply and quality
• Habitat connectivity
• Equity – stewardship diversity
Co-benefits
• Carbon sequestration
• Recreation
• Climate resilience
• Compact growth
Agricultural/Working Lands (WL)
Farmland, grazing land and timberland that support the region’s agricultural economy and provide additional benefits such as habitat protection and carbon capture. • Agricultural/Working Land Objective 1 – Protect important farmland, grazing land, and timber land to support the Bay Area agricultural economy and access to locally- and community-grown food. o Datasets: Farmland (FMMP), Grazing Lands (FMMP)
• Agricultural/Working Land Objective 2 - Maintain areas of high carbon stock and enhance low-carbon stock areas with multi-benefit management to support carbon sequestration. o Dataset: Existing Carbon Stock (Greenprint)
Primary benefits
• Agricultural resources and economy
• Carbon sequestration
• Equity – farmworker housing
• Equity – land ownership diversity
Co-benefits
• Wildlife habitat
• Water supply and quality
• Climate resilience
• Compact growth
Urban Greening (UG)
Existing and potential green spaces in cities that improve community health, capture carbon emissions, address stormwater, and enhance the public realm.
• Urban Greening Objective 1 – Expand tree cover in urban areas with limited shade and vegetation. o Dataset: Tree Canopy (NLCD, 2021)
• Urban Greening Objective 2 – Expand green stormwater infrastructure projects particularly in areas with low surface permeability or other stormwater management issues in urban areas. o Dataset: Impervious Surface (NLCD, 2021)
• Urban Greening Objective 3 – Enhance urban creeks to provide improved ecological, recreational, and resilience functions.
o Dataset: Stream Conservation Targets (CLN 2.0)
Agenda Item #9.1:
• Urban Greening Objective 4 – Prioritize urban greening areas within 1/2-mile radius of Equity Priority Communities and/or areas with high pollution burden.
o Datasets: Equity Priority Communities (MTC), CalEnviroScreen 4.0 (OEHHA) Primary benefits
• Community health
• Climate resilience
• Urban riparian corridors
• Equity – community nature benefits
Co-benefits
• Wildlife habitat
• Water quality
• Recreation
• Urban agriculture
Recreation (R)
Existing and potential parks, trails, and other publicly accessible recreation facilities that support community wellbeing.
• Recreation Objective 1 - Complete and enhance access to the Regional Trails Network. o Dataset: Regional Trail Network (BATC)
• Recreation Objective 2 - Create new and enhance existing local parks, particularly in areas with limited access to outdoor recreation.
o Datasets: Areas of High Park Need (TPL Park Serve), Park Deserts (WRT) • Recreation Objective 3 - Prioritize recreation areas within 1/2 mile radius of EPC. o Dataset: Equity Priority Communities (MTC)
Primary benefits
• Recreation
• Community health
• Zero-emission travel
• Equity – community nature benefits
Co-benefits
• Wildlife habitat
• Water quality
• Climate resilience
• Connectivity
Climate Adaptation (CA)
Areas that will accommodate habitat range shifts and will buffer climate impacts to enhance ecosystem and community resilience.
• Climate Adaptation Objective 1 – Enhance and prepare areas that provide habitat migration opportunities, particularly for marsh and other shoreline systems when sea levels rise, and extreme precipitation events become more frequent.
o Datasets: 100-Year Flood Zone (FEMA), Sea Level Rise - 4.9' (MTC/BCDC, built from USGS & DSC) • Climate Adaptation Objective 2 - Manage very high fire risk to reduce the intensity and spread potential for future wildfires.
o Dataset: Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CALFIRE)
• Climate Adaptation Objective 3 - Enhance areas that provide cooling experiences in areas experiencing extreme heat.
o Datasets: Extreme Heat (CalAdapt), Urban Heat Island Effect (Greenprint/UC Berkeley) Primary benefits
• Climate resilience
• Community health
• Habitat migration
• Equity – community benefits
Co-benefits
• Wildlife habitat
• Carbon sequestration
• Water quality
• Recreation
Agenda Item #9.1:
General Plan Goals
Community Development Element
CD-5.3. Protect important scenic vistas and natural resources, and incorporate significant views and natural features into project designs.
Environmental Resources Element
ER-2.3. Protect and, where necessary, enhance riparian corridors.
ER-2.4. Protect Sonoma Valley watershed resources, including surface and ground water supplies and quality.
ER-2.6. Preserve existing trees and plant new trees.
Agenda Item #9.1:
City of Sonoma
Agenda Item Summary
Meeting: City Council - 04 Jun 2025
Department
Administration
Staff Contact
Rebekah Barr, MMC, City Clerk
Agenda Item Title
Letters of Interest Received and Direction to Mayor Farrar-Rivas or Her Designee Regarding Nominations for Appointees to Regional Commissions & Committees on Behalf of the Mayors' and Councilmembers' Association of Sonoma County
Summary
The City of Sonoma is a member of the Mayors’ and Councilmembers’ Association of Sonoma County (MCMASC). The MCMASC meets on the second Thursdays of the months of February, April, June, August, and October to connect and plan for the future on matters that affect the cities in Sonoma County. All Mayors and Council Members in the incorporated cities in Sonoma County make up the membership of the association. The Mayors of these cities serve as the Board of Directors and the Sonoma County City Selection Committee.
The Board of Directors will make an appointment to one regional commission at the next meeting on June 12, 2025, here in the City of Sonoma. Listed below are the appointments and individuals who have submitted letters of interest for consideration at the April meeting of the Mayors & Council Members Board.
Board of Directors
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Executive Board - 2 Seats (to fill the expiring terms of Susan Adams of Rohnert Park and Stephen Zollman of Sebastopol). 1 primary seat and 1 alternate seat. 2-year term starting in June. • 2 Letters Received for Primary Seat:
o Susan Adams, Rohnert Park
o Frank Quint, Petaluma
• 1 Letter Received for Alternate Seat:
o Stephen Zollman, Sebastopol
Recommended Council Action
Give direction to Mayor Farrar-Rivas or her designee regarding appointment.
Alternative Actions
Council discretion.
Financial Impact
N/A
Agenda Item #9.2:
Environmental Review Status
Environmental Impact Report
Negative Declaration
Exempt
Not Applicable
Approved/Certified
No Action Required
Action Requested
Attachments
ABAG Letters of Interest
Agenda Item #9.2:
130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park CA 94928 (707) 588-2226 Fax (707) 794-9248 www.rpcity.org
City Council
Gerard Giudice
Mayor
Emily Sanborn
Vice Mayor
Susan Hollingsworth Adams
Jackie Elward
Samantha Rodriguez
Councilmembers
________________
Marcela Piedra
City Manager
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon
City Attorney
Lee Burdick
Assistant City Attorney
Cindy Bagley
Director of Community Services
Jamie Cannon
Director of Human Resources
Vanessa Garrett
Director of Public Works
Alicia Giudice
Director of
Development Services
Sylvia Lopez Cuevas
City Clerk
Tim Mattos
Public Safety Director
Betsy Howze
Finance Director
April 14, 2025
2025 Chair City, City of Rohnert Park
Sonoma County Mayors’ and Councilmembers’ Association
130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Attn: Lauren Berges, MCA Clerk [email protected]
Re: Request for Reappointment to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Executive Board
Honorable Mayors and Councilmembers,
I am writing to respectfully request your support for my reappointment to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Executive Board primary seat for a two-year term.
It has been an honor to serve on the ABAG Executive Board since my appointment in February 2021 and to contribute to the vital regional work ABAG leads. Over the past few years, I have also had the privilege of representing our community on the ABAG General Assembly and serving on the Housing Methodology Committee. These roles have deepened my understanding of and commitment to ABAG’s mission to strengthen cooperation and collaboration among local governments to develop innovative and cost-effective solutions to shared regional challenges.
In 2024, I had the honor of serving as Mayor of Rohnert Park. This experience further broadened my perspective on the importance of regional partnerships and informed my contributions to ABAG with a deeper sense of the needs and aspirations of our local communities.
With your support, I look forward to continuing this important work on the Executive Board. Please feel free to contact me at (707) 291-8450 or via email at [email protected] with any questions or to discuss this request further. I appreciate your consideration and your support.
Kind Regards,
Susan H. Adams,
Councilmeber, City of Rohnert Park
Cc: Rohnert Park City Council and City Manager
Agenda Item #9.2:
Frank Quint
Councilmember District 4
Petaluma, CA 94952
(707) 971-9226
May 3, 2025
2025 Chair City,
City of Rohnert Park
Sonoma County Mayors’ and Councilmembers’ Association
130 Avram Avenue, Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Re: Executive Board of the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Honorable Mayors and Councilmembers,
I am writing to respectfully request your support for my appointment to the Executive Board of the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). As a passionate advocate for sustainable communities and equitable growth, I am deeply committed to advancing ABAG’s top priorities: securing new revenues for transit operations, promoting housing affordability, and defending clean air and climate standards.
With a background in transportation, I bring a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing our regional transit systems. I have worked extensively to champion active transportation options, improve multimodal connectivity, and support infrastructure investments that create safer, healthier, and more accessible communities. I believe strongly that a resilient and integrated public transit network is foundational to the Bay Area’s economic vitality and environmental future.
My advocacy for affordable housing is grounded in the belief that every Bay Area resident deserves a stable, affordable place to call home. I have actively supported initiatives that expand housing opportunities near transit and jobs, and I am eager to work with fellow regional leaders to pursue new revenue tools and policy solutions that help meet our shared housing goals.
I also share ABAG’s strong commitment to climate action. I support policies that uphold clean air standards and reduce emissions, and I will advocate for investments that build climate resilience while improving public health and quality of life for all communities.
It would be an honor to bring my experience, passion, and collaborative spirit to the ABAG Executive Board. I would be grateful for your support and the opportunity to serve our region during this pivotal time.
I would be honored by your support for this appointment and respectfully ask for your vote. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 707-971-9226 or by email at [email protected] With appreciation,
Frank Quint
Petaluma City Councilmember
cc: Members of Petaluma City Council
Agenda Item #9.2:
May 5, 2025
Re: Application for ABAG Executive Board Alternate
Position
Chair Giudice, City of Rohnert Park
Sonoma County Mayors’ and Councilmembers’ Association
Attn: Lauren Berges, MCA Clerk
[email protected]
Dear Chair Giudice,
I am excited to be applying for the ABAG Executive Board Alternate position again. I greatly enjoyed my past term and the meetings I attended. I have developed relationships with many other Bay area electeds during this time. Continuing to learn from this position and continuing to develop these relationships will contribute to our association.
My legal experience has contributed to my understanding of how this JPA operates and fulfills its mission of strengthening cooperation and collaboration across local governments to build healthier, stronger communities. Part of this is developing best practices as well as the sharing of resources. One such resource is the available technical assistance related to complying with our required housing elements.
Learning and becoming part of helping ABAG resolve its challenges related to obtaining past CalPers obligations has been very rewarding. Exploring the different ways it is Agenda Item #9.2:
2 attempting to do this, to include the sale of real estate, has been very informative. This ongoing acquired knowledge will also contribute to our association.
I would be honored to continue in this position. As always, if you have questions, please e-mail. Thank you very much for your consideration.
All Best,
signed
Stephen Zollman
Sebastopol Mayor
[email protected]
Agenda Item #9.2: