South El Monte City Council
June 14, 2022

Gloria Olmos, Mayor
Manuel Acosta, Mayor Pro Tem
Richard Angel, Councilmember
Hector Delgado, Councilmember
Gracie Retamoza, Councilmember
Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk
Anthony R. Taylor, City Attorney

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE

REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
June 14, 2022, 6:00 PM
1415 Santa Anita Avenue, South El Monte, CA 91733
***SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19***
On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361, which modified the Brown Act to allow for teleconferencing participation at local legislative body public meetings during a proclaimed state of emergency. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e) as amended by AB 361, City Council is authorized to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically available to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Public participation will be allowed via the information below.

PUBLIC COMMENT
To participate during public comment via teleconference, see below:

Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86581711880
Webinar ID: 865 8171 1880
Or Call In: 1 669 900 6833, when prompted, enter 86581711880#

LIVE STREAMING OF MEETINGS
The City of South El Monte live streams the City Council Meetings over the Internet at https://www.cityofsouthelmonte.org/129/City-Council-Agendas-Minutes after the meetings, recordings are immediately posted. NOTE: Your attendance at this public meeting may result in the streaming and recording of your image and/or voice.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, if you require a disability-related modification or accommodation to attend or participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please call the City Clerk’s office at (626) 579-6540 ext. 3280 or ext. 3220 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

GENERAL COMMENT
Members of the public wishing to submit a general comment or a comment on an agenda item, can email [email protected] or call (626) 579-6540 ext. 3280 to leave a voicemail message. All comments received an hour before the scheduled meeting will be read during public comment and made part of the record.

MEETINGS
The City Council holds regular meetings on the second and fourth Tuesday of every month. Regular meetings start at 6 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1415 Santa Anita Avenue, South El Monte, California. Special and Adjourned Regular meetings start time are to be determined.

POSTING LOCATIONS OF AGENDA AND/OR CANCELLATION NOTICES Regular meeting agendas will be posted at least 72 hours before the meeting (GC 54954(a)(1)).

Agenda and Cancellation Notices can be viewed online and are also posted at the following three (3) locations: City Hall located at 1415 Santa Anita Avenue, Senior Center located at 1556 Central Avenue and the Community Center located at 1530 Central Avenue, South El Monte, California.

VIEWING OF AGENDA PACKETS
Full agenda packet can be viewed either at www.cityofsouthelmonte.org/129/CityCouncil-Agendas-Minutes or in the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours Monday through Thursday 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Closed on Fridays and major holidays.

ISSUES RELATED TO AGENDA
For issues related to the agenda, including a disability-related accommodation necessary to participate in this meeting, please contact:

Donna G. Schwartz, CMC, City Clerk
Ph (626) 579-6540 ext. 3280
Cell (626) 274-4842
Paola Lara, Deputy City Clerk
Ph (626) 579-6540 ext. 3220
Cell (626) 374-1998

AGENDA BEGINS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE

1. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers: Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta and Mayor Olmos

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Richard Angel

3. INVOCATION
Laura Lozano, Permit Technician, City of South El Monte

4. PRESENTATIONS

4.a. Certificates of Recognition, Presented to the South El Monte High School 2022 Valedictorians and Salutatorian

4.b. Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of June as LGBTQ Pride Month

5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AND WAIVER OF FULL READING OF

ORDINANCES
By motion of the City Council, this is the time to notify the public of any changes to the agenda, remove items from the consent calendar for individual consideration and/or rearrange the order of the agenda.

6. PUBLIC COMMENT
Speakers may provide public comments on any matter within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, including items on the agenda. Each speaker will be limited to five minutes. Unless a majority of the Council objects, the Mayor may provide speakers more or less time to speak. All comments or queries shall be addressed to the Council as a body and not to any specific member thereof. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a)(2), the Ralph M. Brown Act, no action or discussion by the City Council shall be undertaken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except to briefly provide information, ask for clarification, provide direction to staff, or schedule a matter for a future meeting.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and customary and are enacted by a single motion with the exception of items previously removed by a member of the City Council during "Approval of the Agenda" for individual consideration. Any items removed shall be individually considered immediately after taking action on the Consent Calendar.

7.a. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 2022

Staff is requesting approval of Minutes for the May 24, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 24, 2022.

CONSENT CALENDAR (CONTINUED)

7.b. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-38, APPROVING WARRANTS FOR THE PERIOD OF MAY 25, 2022
THROUGH JUNE 14, 2022

Authorizing payment of City expenditures for the period of May 25, 2022 through June 14, 2022 totaling $1,475,634.42
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22-38, authorizing payment of City expenditures.

7.c. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-39,

PROCLAIMING A LOCAL EMERGENCY PERSISTS AND

AUTHORIZING THE USE OF REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETING

PROCEDURES BY THE CITY'S LEGISLATIVE BODIES AS
AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) ET SEQ.

FOR THE PERIOD OF JUNE 14, 2022 THROUGH JULY 13, 2022

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361 into law. AB 361 was made effective October 1, 2021. Pursuant to AB 361, staff recommends consideration of Resolution No. 22-39, proclaiming a local emergency persists and authorizing the use of remote meeting procedures by the City’s legislative bodies, which can include meetings held via a virtual platform (e.g. Zoom), for the period of June 14, 2022 through July 13, 2022.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22-39, proclaiming a local emergency persists and authorizing the use of alternative meeting procedures by the City’s legislative bodies, such as utilizing a virtual platform (e.g. Zoom) for the period of June 14, 2022 through July 13, 2022.

7.d. and 7.e. next page.

CONSENT CALENDAR (CONTINUED)

7.d. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22- 40,

APPROVING LIST OF STREET REHABILITATION PROJECTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2022-2023 UNDER THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 (SENATE BILL 1 BEALL AND

FRAZIER)

On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 1 (Beall and Frazier, Chapter 5, Statute 2017), which is known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation and critical safety needs on both the state highway and local streets and road system. Beginning November 1, 2017, the State Controller will deposit various portions of this new funding into the newly created Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). A percentage of this new RMRA funding will be apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties pursuant to Streets and Highways Code (SHC) Section 2032(h) for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and road systems. In order to be eligible for this funding, cities are required to adopt a resolution to list proposed projects every fiscal year.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22- 40, approving the list of street rehabilitation projects for FY 2022-2023 under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall and Frazier).

7.e. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-41, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO AGREEMENT SUBAWARD
NUMBER ENP202110 WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR

THE ELDERLY NUTRITION PROGRAM (ENP) SERVICES

On June 22, 2021, a one-year agreement between the County of Los Angeles through its Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services (the “County”) and the City of South El Monte (the “City”) was entered into to assist with the funding for the City’s Elderly Nutrition Program Services (the “Agreement”). The agreement will expire on June 30, 2022. This Amendment will extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2023 to provide baseline funding for the Elderly Nutrition Programs during Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-2023. Staff is requesting for City Council to authorize the City Manager to approve Amendment No. 10 to the Agreement with the County to continue providing nutrition services for seniors.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22-41, approving Amendment No. 10 to extend existing agreement Subaward Number ENP202110 with the County of Los Angeles and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute agreement.

8. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None

9. GENERAL BUSINESS

9.a. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-42, APPROVING AN

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE AND

HARRY WONG FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR TO OPERATE A

CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET (CFM) IN THE CITY

The City of South El Monte recognizes the importance of having a vibrant farmers market that is a positive reflection of the South El Monte community. The City desires to hire Harry Wong as a “Consultant” to operate a Certified Farmers Market (CFM) in the City of South El Monte every Thursday from 9:00 am to 2:00 pm for the duration of one year with the option to extend the term for two additional one-year terms.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22-42, authorizing the City Manager to finalize and execute an agreement with Harry Wong to operate a Certified Farmers Market in front of the Community Center.

9.b. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-43, CALLING FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022, GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION; RESOLUTION NO. 22-44, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS (BOS) OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO

CONSOLIDATE (AND SERVICE) A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022, WITH THE STATEWIDE
GENERAL ELECTION; AND RESOLUTION NO. 22-45, SETTING

REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATE STATEMENTS

City of South El Monte’s General Municipal Election will be held Tuesday, November 8, 2022. Pursuant to State law, the City Council must officially “call” for the November 8, 2022, General Municipal Election; request the BOS of the County of Los Angeles to Consolidate (and service) a General Municipal Election to be held Tuesday, November 8, 2022, with the Statewide General Election; and approve regulations for Candidate Statements.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22-43, Calling Election, Resolution No. 22-44, Consolidating (and service) Election, and Resolution No. 22-45, Setting Regulations for Candidate Statements.

9.c. – 9.d. next page.

GENERAL BUSINESS (CONTINUED)

9.c. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF 2022 FOURTH OF JULY

FIREWORKS STAND PERMITS

Pursuant to Section 8.08.050 of the South El Monte Municipal Code, the City Council has the authority to grant up to eight fireworks stand permits per year to qualified organizations. Pursuant to 8.08.040, the City Administrator is required to investigate and report to the Council recommending for or against issuance of the requested permits.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council approve the permits to allow for six firework stands and for which applications have been received in conjunction with the Fourth of July, 2022. The Planning Division has reviewed the applications and found that they are in compliance with Chapter 8.08 of the South El Monte Municipal Code.

9.d. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-46,

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT
SERVICES (PARS) ESTABLISHING A SECTION 115 TRUST TO

ADDRESS THE UNFUNDED OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFEIT
(OPEB) LIABILITY

At the May 24, 2022 City Council Meeting a presentation was made by the City's Financial Advisors, Kosmont Transaction Services, analyzing the various entities that offer Section 115 Trusts to government agencies to manage their OPEB liabilities. The presentation examined rates of return on investments, transaction fees, and investment options. Direction was provided by City Council to establish a Section 115 Trust with PARS. The purpose of this presentation is to implement the Section 115 Trust agreement as directed.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council Adopt Resolution 22-46, authorizing the City to establish a tax-exempt trust administered by Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) with U.S.

Bank as trustee, and its sub-adviser HighMark Capital Management, Inc., to provide investment management services for the OPEB trust and authorize City Manager or designee as the City's Plan Administrator to execute the PARS legal and administrative documents and to take required actions to implement the Section 115 Trust agreement.

9.e. next page.

GENERAL BUSINESS (CONTINUED)

9.e. APPOINTMENT OF COUNCILMEMBERS TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO ELECTED OFFICIALS (NALEO) 39TH
ANNUAL CONFERENCE, JUNE 23-25, 2022, CHICAGO, IL

NALEO is a national non-profit organization that strengthens American democracy by promoting the full participation of Latinos in civic engagement. Attendance to conferences offered by organizations such as NALEO is fundamentally important to the advancement and education of local elected officials.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council appoint a Councilmember or Councilmembers to attend the NALEO 39th Annual Conference, June 23-25, 2022 in Chicago, IL.

10. COMMITTEE REPORTS, INCLUDING AB 1234 REPORTS
AB 1234, section 53232.3(d) requires Members of a legislative body to provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency (i.e., League of California Cities Conferences, ICSC conferences, etc.) at the next regular meeting of the legislative body.

11. CORRESPONDENCE - None

12. COUNCILMEMBERS’ AGENDA - None

13. CLOSED SESSION

13.a. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
City Negotiator: City Manager
Employee Organizations: South El Monte Employees Association and the South El Monte Executive Management Team Association

13.b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (e)(1) -

14. ADJOURNMENT
Tuesday, June 28, 2022, at 6:00 p.m.

I Donna G. Schwartz, hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted not less than 72 hours at the following locations: City of South El Monte City Hall, Senior Center and Community Center and made available at www.cityofsouthelmonte.org on this 9
th day of June 2022.

City Clerk, CMC

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.a.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Donna Schwartz, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Certificates of Recognition, Presented to the South El Monte High School 2022 Valedictorians and Salutatorian
SUMMARY:

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

DISCUSSION:

ATTACHMENT(S):

None

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.b.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Donna Schwartz, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of June as LGBTQ Pride Month
SUMMARY:

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

DISCUSSION:

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Proclamation

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 7.a.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Donna Schwartz, City Clerk
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 2022
SUMMARY: Staff is requesting approval of Minutes for the May 24, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 24, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT: None.

DISCUSSION: None.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Minutes

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY, MAY 24, 2022 - 6:00 PM

1. ROLL CALL
Mayor Olmos called the meeting to order at 6:02 PM
PRESENT: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, and Mayor Olmos
STAFF PRESENT: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager; Anthony R. Taylor, City Attorney; Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk; Rene Salas, Deputy City Manager; Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director (via zoom); William Fox, Interim Finance Director; and Robert Molina, Recreation Specialist.

STAFF ABSENT: Paola Lara, Deputy City Clerk.

Zoom was provided for the Public to participate during public comment via teleconference.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor Gloria Olmos led the Pledge of Allegiance.

3. INVOCATION – Pastor Charlie Corum, South El Monte Community Outreach offered the Invocation.

City Attorney Anthony R. Taylor requested item 9.c. be moved up for discussion before item 4.a. and announced there will be no Closed Session item 13.a.

Council concurred.

Councilmember Hector Delgado requested an urgency item be placed on the agenda for a request from El Monte Union High School District to provide bus transportation to students and families for South El Monte High School’s graduation. City Attorney Anthony R. Taylor recommended this action be taken under approval of agenda.

9. GENERAL BUSINESS

9.c. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL TO ESTABLISH A SECTION 115

TRUST WITH THE PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT SERVICES (PARS)

AND PROPOSE ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT
Mayor Olmos announced the item.

Interim Finance Director William Fox introduced Dan Massiello, Kosmont Transaction Services, who presented a PowerPoint (via zoom) on Establishing a Section 115 Trust and Provider Comparison.

A motion was made by Councilmember Delgado, seconded by Councilmember Angel to approve staff engaging with PARS to establish a Section 115 Trust and funding strategy to address the unfunded OPEB liability, and to have the contract and funding strategy brought back to City Council for final approval prior to implementation. Motion carried 5-0 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, and Mayor Olmos
NAYS: Councilmember(s): None

4. PRESENTATIONS:

4.a. Ken Rausch and Chris Knight, South El Monte/El Monte Chamber of Commerce, presented a check with proceeds collected from the City’s State of the City Address in the amount of $36,000 to the South El Monte/El Monte Chamber of Commerce Educational Foundation.

Principal Morales, South El Monte High School Principal, thanked the City Council on behalf of El Monte Union High School District Superintendent Dr. Zuniga, for supporting student learning.

4.b. City Council received a report from the Sheriff’s Department and discussed matters concerning law enforcement in the City for the month of April.

4.c. City Council received a report from Community Development Director Colby Cataldi (via zoom) on Code Enforcement and Public Safety activities for the month of April.

Councilmember Delgado requested staff address an encampment on Garvey and Rosemead Boulevard asking to clean it up and provide services to the homeless individuals.

5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AND WAIVER OF FULL READING OF

ORDINANCES
A motion was made by Councilmember Delgado, seconded Mayor Pro Tem Acosta to add urgency item 9.f. Request from El Monte Union High School District to Provide Bus Transportation for Students and Families for South El Monte High School’s Graduation, and approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta and Mayor Olmos
NAYS: Councilmember(s): None

6. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Olmos opened public comment.

1. Eduardo Sauceda, South El Monte Resident, spoke of the lack of street parking on Michael Hunt Drive and suggested the City create a parking program for residents to get a car sticker to park on the street.

There being no further comment, Mayor Olmos closed public comment.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Councilmember Delgado, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Acosta to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, and Mayor Olmos
NAYS: Councilmember(s): None

7.a. Approved Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting held May 10, 2022.

7.b. Adopted Resolution No. 22-34, approving warrants for the period of May 11, 2022 through May 24, 2021 totaling $370,178.24.

8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.

9. GENERAL BUSINESS
Mayor Olmos recessed the meeting at 7:48 p.m. and reconvened at 7:51 p.m.

9.a. UPDATE ON HOMELESS PROGRAM
Mayor Olmos announced the item.

City Manager Rachel Barbosa presented a PowerPoint on a proposed site for a homeless shelter for women with children.

A motion was made by Councilmember Angel, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Acosta to receive and file the report. Motion carried 5-0 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, and Mayor Olmos
NAYS: Councilmember(s): None

9.b. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-35,

APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL

MONTE AND THE EL MONTE/SOUTH EL MONTE CHAMBER OF

COMMERCE
Mayor Olmos announced the item.

City Attorney Anthony R. Taylor disclosed his law firm, Aleshire and Wynder, LLP, is a member of the El Monte/South El Monte Chamber of Commerce and they do not receive funds or conduct legal work for them.

Ken Rausch and Chris Knight, El Monte/South El Monte Chamber of Commerce, presented a PowerPoint providing an update on their activities and economic business development over the last few years.

Deputy City Manager Rene Salas provided additional information on the scope of services for this agreement.

A motion was made by Councilmember Angel, seconded by Councilmember Delgado to adopt Resolution No. 22-35, approving an agreement with the El Monte/South El Monte Chamber of Commerce, with the amendment to the schedule of compensation to continue to pay a quarterly amount of $2,500 for fiscal year 21/22 and 22/23. Additionally, City Council is to consider increasing the quarterly amount to $5,000 for an annual amount of $20,000 during the fiscal year 22/23 budget discussion. Motion carried 5-0 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, and Mayor Olmos
NAYS: Councilmember(s): None

9.c. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL TO ESTABLISH A SECTION 115

TRUST WITH THE PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT SERVICES (PARS)

AND PROPOSE ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT
Item 9.c. was discussed before item 4.a.

9.d. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-36,

APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) BETWEEN

COUNCIL FOR WATERSHED HEALTH (CWH) AND THE CITY OF

SOUTH EL MONTE - MERCED AVENUE GREENWAY PROJECT
Mayor Olmos announced the item.

Community Development Director Colby Cataldi presented the staff report (via zoom).

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, seconded by Councilmember Angel to adopt Resolution No. 22-36, approving an MOA between the Council for Watershed Health (CWH) and the City of South El Monte for the Merced Avenue Greenway Project and authorizing the City Manager and/or designee to execute the MOA with Council for Watershed Health. Motion carried 5-0 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, and Mayor Olmos
NAYS: Councilmember(s): None

9.e. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-37,

AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) TO
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PLANNING &

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF A LOCAL

ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Mayor Olmos announced the item.

Community Development Director Colby Cataldi presented the staff report (via zoom).

A motion was made by Councilmember Delgado, seconded by Councilmember Angel to adopt Resolution No. 22-37, awarding a professional services agreement to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for Planning & Engineering Services for the Preparation of a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) in the amount of $39,976.88.

Motion carried 5-0 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, and Mayor Olmos
NAYS: Councilmember(s): None

URGENCY ITEM ADDED UNDER APPROVAL OF AGENDA

9.f. REQUEST FROM EL MONTE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT TO

PROVIDE BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR STUDENTS AND FAMILIES
FOR SOUTH EL MONTE HIGH SCHOOL’S GRADUATION
Councilmember Delgado provided information on this request made by the school district for the City’s assistance to provide transportation services for South El Monte High School’s graduation on June 2, 2022.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, seconded by Councilmember Angel to approve the request from the El Monte Union High School District to provide transportation services for South El Monte High School’s graduation on June 2, 2022. Motion carried 5-0 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s): Angel, Delgado, Retamoza, Mayor Pro Tem Acosta, and Mayor Olmos
NAYS: Councilmember(s): None

10. COMMITTEE REPORTS, INCLUDING AB 1234 REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tem Acosta announced his attendance at the California Contract Cities Conference, International Council of Shopping Centers Conference (ICSC), and An Evening with the Captain event.

Councilmember Retamoza announced her attendance at An Evening with the Captain event and the California Contract Cities Conference.

Councilmember Delgado announced his attendance at the California Contract Cities Conference and An Evening with the Captain event.

Councilmember Angel announced his attendance at An Evening with the Captain event, California Contract Cities Conference, and International Council of Shopping Centers Conference (ICSC).

Mayor Olmos announced her attendance at the California Contract Cities Conference, International Council of Shopping Centers Conference (ICSC), An Evening with the Captain event, Sanitation District No. 15 meeting, invited the public to the Neighborhood Watch meeting on June 1, 2022, and announced SEAACA still had adoption opportunities.

11. CORRESPONDENCE: None

12. COUNCILMEMBERS’ AGENDA: None

13. CLOSED SESSION:

Item pulled.

13.a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) – [One case]

14. RECESS COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Olmos recessed the meeting at 8:58 p.m. to the Successor Agency meeting.

Mayor Olmos reconvened the meeting at 9:00 p.m.

15. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business coming before this body, at 9:00 p.m. Mayor Olmos held a moment of silence and adjourned the meeting in memory of the victims of the Uvalde School shooting, to a regular meeting on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, at 6:00 p.m.
______________________________ ______________________
Donna G. Schwartz, CMC, City Clerk Gloria Olmos, Mayor

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 7.b.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: William Fox, Interim Finance Director
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22- 38, APPROVING WARRANTS FOR THE PERIOD OF MAY 25,
2022, THROUGH JUNE 14, 2022
SUMMARY: Authorizing payment of City expenditures for the period of May 25, 2022 through June 14, 2022 totaling $1,475,634.42
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22- 38, authorizing payment of City expenditures.

FISCAL IMPACT:

DISCUSSION:

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 22-38
B. Warrants 6.14.22

RESOLUTION NO. 22-38

A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL

ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS FOR THE
PERIOD OF MAY 25, 2022, THROUGH JUNE 14, 2022,
TOTALING $1,475,634.42

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: That in accordance with Section 37202 of the Government Code, the Finance Director hereby certifies to the accuracy of the following demands and the availability of funds for payment thereof.
_____________________________________
Finance Director
SECTION 2: That the following claims and demands have been audited as required by law and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount hereafter set forth.

CLAIMANT CLAIM PERIOD WARRANT #’S AMOUNT
FY 21/22 Electronic Warrants 05/25/2022-06/14/2022 DFT0000146- DFT0000166
$227,403.72
FY 21/22 Hand Typed Warrants 05/25/2022-06/14/2022 10313-10333 $74,490.20 FY 21/22 Regular Warrants 05/25/2022-06/14/2022 10334-10410 $1,041,273.17 Payroll Check PPE 05/28/2022 1037-1052 $7,302.31
Payroll Direct Deposit PPE 05/28/2022 1486-1586 $125,165.02 TOTAL EXPENDITURES RESOLUTION NO. 22-38 $1,475,634.42
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2022. __________________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 22-38, was duly passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June 2022, and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

______________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 7.c.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Anthony R. Taylor, City Attorney
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22- 39, PROCLAIMING A LOCAL EMERGENCY PERSISTS AND

AUTHORIZING THE USE OF REMOTE TELECONFERENCE

MEETING PROCEDURES BY THE CITY'S LEGISLATIVE

BODIES AS AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54953(e) ET SEQ. FOR THE PERIOD OF JUNE 14,
2022 THROUGH JULY 13, 2022
SUMMARY: On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361 into law. AB 361 was made effective October 1, 2021. Pursuant to AB 361, staff recommends consideration of Resolution No. 22-39, proclaiming a local emergency persists and authorizing the use of remote meeting procedures by the City’s legislative bodies, which can include meetings held via a virtual platform (e.g. Zoom), for the period of June 14, 2022 through July 13, 2022.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22- 39, proclaiming a local emergency persists and authorizing the use of alternative meeting procedures by the City’s legislative bodies, such as utilizing a virtual platform (e.g. Zoom) for the period of June 14, 2022 through July 13, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT: None.

DISCUSSION: In March of 2020, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California, and issued Executive Order N25-20 to facilitate the ability of legislative bodies to meet using remote/virtual platforms to comply with health orders. Since that time, several other Executive Orders have been issued that further modified the requirements related to the conduct of teleconferenced meetings and the right of public participation during the state of emergency. The Executive Orders collectively operated to remove certain requirements for teleconferenced meetings, including that each teleconference location be accessible to the public, and that members of the public be able to address the legislative body at each teleconference location.

The Executive Orders allowed the City Council and each of the City’s legislative bodies, commissions, and committees subject to the Brown Act to modify how meetings were conducted to protect the health and safety of the legislative bodies, staff, and the public, while ensuring transparency and accessibility for open and public meetings. However, those executive orders expired on October 1, 2021.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361 into law. AB 361 was made effective October 1, 2021, to correspond to the timing of expiration of the executive orders.

AB 361 allows legislative bodies to continue to utilize remote/virtual platforms for meetings during a state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor that includes the City, provided that one of the following three criteria is met with respect to the meeting:
i) State or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or
ii) The legislative body is meeting for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the state of emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; or
iii) The legislative body has previously determined, by majority vote, that, as a result of the state of emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

These provisions of AB 361 are effective until January 1, 2024. This means these provisions may be invoked any time there is a proclaimed state of emergency by the Governor (e.g., wildfires) and the City Council can make at least one of the enumerated findings.

On October 26, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-69 proclaiming a local emergency persists and authorizing the use of remote teleconference procedures by the City’s legislative bodies for the period of October 26 through November 25, 2021. To avoid a lapse in time between meetings and the effective date of Resolution No. 21-69, on November 9, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-72 proclaiming a local emergency persists and authorizing the use of remote teleconference procedures by the City’s legislative bodies for the period of November 9 through December 9, 2021. Since then, City Council has adopted the following resolutions authorizing the same: Resolution No. 21-78 adopted on December 14, 2021 for the period of December 14, 2021 through January 12, 2022; Resolution No. 22-02 adopted on January 11, 2022 for the period of January 11, 2022 through February 9, 2022; Resolution No. 22-11 adopted February 8, 2022 for the period of February 8, 2022 through March 9, 2022; Resolution No. 22-18 adopted March 8, 2022 for the period of March 8, 2022 through April 6, 2022; Resolution No. 22-23 adopted April 12, 2022 for the period of April 12, 2022 through May 12, 2022; and Resolution No, 22-33 adopted May 10, 2022 for the period May 10, 2022 through June 8, 2022.

In large part due to the Omicron variant, there has been a sharp surge of Covid-19 positive cases since December 2021. In large part due to the Omicron variant, there has been a sharp surge of Covid-19 positive cases since December 2021. The CDC indicators and thresholds measuring community transmission of COVID-19 within the County of Los Angeles continue to be at a substantial level. The Omicron variant is the predominant strain in Los Angeles County and spreads more easily than the original

virus. While the Omicron BA.1 variant is currently the dominant variant in Los Angeles County, there is a gradual increase in the level of the BA.2 subvariant in the County. The BA.2 subvariant is highly transmissible, and has become the dominant variant in many countries, including some that are facing renewed surges in cases and increased hospitalizations.

In light of the continuing COVID-19 emergency, and the continued threats to health and safety posed by indoor meetings with large attendance, staff recommends adoption of the proposed resolution making the findings required to invoke AB 361. Doing so will allow the meetings of the City Council and each of the City’s legislative bodies to continue to occur by teleconference, without adhering to the teleconferencing requirements set out in Government Code Section 54953(b)(3) that would otherwise apply absent invocation of AB 361.

Continued reliance on AB 361 will require adoption of a new resolution making the required findings every 30 days.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 22-39

RESOLUTION NO. 22-39

A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL

PROCLAIMING A LOCAL EMERGENCY PERSISTS AND

AUTHORIZING THE USE OF REMOTE TELECONFERENCE
MEETING PROCEDURES BY THE CITY’S LEGISLATIVE

BODIES, AS AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54953(e) ET SEQ., FOR THE PERIOD OF JUNE 14,
2022 THROUGH JULY 13, 2022
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of South El Monte is committed to preserving and nurturing public access, transparency, observation and participation in its meetings and the meetings of each of its legislative bodies (as that term is defined in Government Code section 54952, including commissions, boards and committees subject to the Brown Act); and WHEREAS, all meetings of the City’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, codified as Government Code section 54950 et seq., so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and observe the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business; and
WHEREAS, the Brown Act, as amended by Assembly Bill 361 (2021), amending Government Code section 54953(e) et seq., allows for remote teleconferencing observation and participation in meetings by members of a legislative body and members of the public, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3) regarding, subject to the existence of certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, the initial required condition is a declaration of a state of emergency by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act, Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state and within the boundaries of the City, as provided in Government Code section 8558; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, pursuant to Government Code section 8625, Governor Newsom declared the existence of a state of emergency for the State of California, in response to the outbreak of respiratory illness due to a novel coronavirus (a disease now known as COVID19); and WHEREAS, also on March 4, 2020, the County of Los Angeles followed suit and declared the existence of a state of emergency for the County of Los Angeles; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2020, out of an abundance of caution to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the Mayor of the City of South El Monte proclaimed a local emergency due to the public health threat caused by COVID-19; and WHEREAS, the Mayor’s proclamation found that conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City as a result of the COVID-19 virus and that these conditions are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City; and

WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, the City’s Director of Emergency Services declared a local emergency for the City pursuant to Chapter 2.32 of the South El Monte Municipal Code, finding that conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City as a result of the COVID-19 virus and that these conditions are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-24, ratifying the proclamation of a local emergency in response to COVID-19; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 54953(e) further requires that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or, the legislative body of the City finds that meeting in person would present imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees; and
WHEREAS, the State of California and County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, County officials are requiring masking in an effort to slow the continuously high level of transmission of COVID-19 throughout Los Angeles County, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) continue to recommend physical distancing; and
WHEREAS, in large part due to the Omicron variant, there has been a sharp surge of Covid-19 positive cases since December 2021. The CDC indicators and thresholds measuring community transmission of COVID-19 within the County of Los Angeles continue to be at a substantial level. The Omicron variant is the predominant strain in Los Angeles County and spreads more easily than the original virus. While the Omicron BA.1 variant is currently the dominant variant in Los Angeles County, there is a gradual increase in the level of the BA.2 subvariant in the County. The BA.2 subvariant is highly transmissible, and has become the dominant variant in many countries, including some that are facing renewed surges in cases and increased hospitalizations; and
WHEREAS, the Council hereby finds that such emergency conditions persist in the City, such that meeting in person for the meetings of the legislative bodies of the City would present imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees as a result of the increased risk of the spread of the COVID-19 virus among those in attendance; and
WHEREAS, the Council hereby finds that the state of emergency due to the COVID-19 virus and the conditions related thereto has caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons within the City that are likely to be beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City, and thereby affirms, authorizes, and proclaims that the existence of a local emergency persists throughout the City, and ratifies the proclamation of state of emergency by the Governor of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the Council hereby finds that, as a consequence of the existing local emergency, the legislative bodies of the City shall conduct their meetings without compliance with Government Code section 54953(b)(3), and shall instead comply with the remote teleconference meeting requirements as authorized by Government Code section 54953(e) et seq.; and WHEREAS, the Council affirms that the City will allow for observation and participation by Councilmembers, members of the City’s legislative bodies, and the public by allowing public participation and comment in real time via Zoom or by telephone, as well as allowing limited inPage 33 of 186 person attendance for certain legislative bodies of the City, as will be duly indicated in the agendas of the legislative bodies, respectively, in an effort to protect the constitutional and statutory rights of all attendees.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE FINDS, RESOLVES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein Resolution by reference.

Section 2. The Council hereby recognizes and affirms the existence and conditions of a state of emergency as proclaimed by the Governor, the existence of emergency conditions in the City, and affirms, authorizes, and proclaims that the existence of a local emergency persists throughout the City.

Section 3. The Council hereby ratifies the Governor of the State of California’s Proclamation of State of Emergency, effective as of its issuance date of March 4, 2020.

Section 4. Further, the Council finds that holding the meetings of the City’s legislative bodies in person with no limitations to attendance would present imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees as a result of the increased risk of the spread of the COVID-19 virus among those in attendance, and that the State of California and County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with the COVID-19 emergency, as required by Government Code section 54953(e) et seq.

Section 5. The City Manager and legislative bodies of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and public meetings via teleconference in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) et seq. and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) July 13, 2022, or (ii) such time the Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies (as that term is defined in Government Code §54952, including commissions, boards and committees subject to the Brown Act) of the City may continue to teleconference without compliance with Government Code section 54953(b)(3).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2022.

________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 22-39, was duly passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June 2022, and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

______________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 7.d.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22- 40, APPROVING LIST OF STREET REHABILITATION
PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2022-2023 UNDER THE
ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
(SENATE BILL 1 BEALL AND FRAZIER)
SUMMARY: On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 1 (Beall and Frazier, Chapter 5, Statute 2017), which is known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation and critical safety needs on both the state highway and local streets and road system. Beginning November 1, 2017, the State Controller will deposit various portions of this new funding into the newly created Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). A percentage of this new RMRA funding will be apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties pursuant to Streets and Highways Code (SHC) Section 2032(h) for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and road systems. In order to be eligible for this funding, cities are required to adopt a resolution to list proposed projects every fiscal year.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22- 40, approving the list of street rehabilitation projects for FY 2022-2023 under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall and Frazier).

FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact at this time.

DISCUSSION: SB-1 is a significant new investment of about $5.2 billion per year in California's transportation systems. The Act increases per gallon fuel excise taxes, diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration taxes, stabilizes the problematic price-based fuel tax rates, and provides for inflationary adjustments to rates in future years. The Act will more than double local streets and road funds allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account, allocating funds from new taxes through a new Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2030, RMRA local streets and roads allocations must be used for projects "that include, but are

not limited to," the following:
• Road maintenance and rehabilitation
• Safety projects
• Railroad grade separations
• Traffic control devices
• Complete street components, "including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm-water capture projects in conjunction with any other allowable project." Maintenance of Effort: RMRA
The Road Repair and Accountability Act contains a local agency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds allocated through the RMRA. The Act states that the MOE requirement is to ensure that these new road funds do not supplant existing levels of city and county general revenue spending on streets and roads. The MOE for the receipt of RMRA funds state that a city or county must maintain general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than the average of three years. In making this calculation, an agency may exclude one-time funds. A city or county that fails to comply in a particular year may make it up with additional expenditures in the following year. The Act provides that the State Controller may perform audits to ensure compliance with these MOE rules. If the State Controller determines that a city or county has not met its MOE, the agency will be required to reimburse the state for the funds it received during that fiscal year. However, a city or county that fails to comply in a particular fiscal year may expend during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is sufficient to comply. Any funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply will be reapportioned to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in compliance.

Spending Plans and Reports: RMRA
The Road Repair and Accountability Act stipulates that, prior to receiving RMRA funds in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a project list pursuant to an adopted budget. The list must include for each project:
description, location, schedule, useful life. The Road Repair and Accountability Act also requires that a city or county submit to the CTC an annual report of project completion in order to receive RMRA funds. The report must include descriptions of all projects for which RMRA funds were expended including: description, location, funds expended, completion date, estimated useful life of the project.

The City of South El Monte allocation for FY 2022/23 is estimated to be $485,435.00. (Attachment B – Projected FY 2022-23 Revenues on page 36).

The City is receiving a higher allocation this year. Last year’s (FY 2021-22) allocation was $441,093.00.

The City’s required local MOE amount is estimated to be $1,484.00.

The projects below are being carried over from the FY 2021-22 project list:

Pavement Rehabilitation Program, FY 2022-23: Roadway rehabilitation including asphalt coldmill and overlay, and slurry seal on the following streets as listed on the City’s pavement management system. Local residential streets located south of Central Ave,

west of Santa Anita Ave, north of Hwy-60, west of Peck Rd. The project also includes select segments of Chico Ave, Klingerman St, Rush St, Potrero Ave and Floradale Ave.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 22-40
B. Local Streets & Roads (LSR) Estimated Allocations

01257.0001/796380.1

ATTACHMENT A

01257.0001/796380.1
RESOLUTION NO. 22-40

A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-
23 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive = funding for this fiscal year from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $485,435.00 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2022-23 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 funding will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, and increasing access and mobility options for the public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities and project list; and WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the highest-priority and most cost-effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate the following streets listed below throughout the City this year; and WHEREAS, the 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in an “at risk” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a better condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets

01257.0001/796380.1
infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant benefits overall.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference.

SECTION 2. The following list of proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with fiscal year 2022-23 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

There is no new project proposed.

SECTION 3. The following previously proposed and adopted projects may utilize fiscal year 2022-23 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in their delivery. With the relisting of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Description Location Estimated
Useful Life
Anticipated
Project
Schedule
Start
Anticipated
Project
Schedule
Completion
Pavement Rehabilitation Program, FY 2022-
23: Roadway rehabilitation including asphalt
coldmill and overlay, and slurry seal on the
following streets as listed on City’s pavement
management system.

Local residential
streets located
south of Central
Ave, west of
Santa Anita Ave,
north of Hwy-60,
west of Peck Rd.

Project also
includes select
segments of
Chico Ave,
Klingerman St,
Rush St, Potrero
Ave and Floradale
Ave.
10-20 9/2022 3/2023
SECTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution.

01257.0001/796380.1
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2022. _____________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 22-40 was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a Regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June, 2022, and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT B
9

CaliforniaCityFinance.com Updated January 20, 2022
The California Local Government Finance Almanac
Shared Revenue Estimates: State Revenue Allocations to Cities and Counties Local Streets and Roads Estimates: 2020-21, 2021-22
Including Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
The state of California imposes per-gallon excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel and registration taxes on motor vehicles with allocations dedicated to transportation purposes.1 The
local (city and county) portions of these allocations flow through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), the familiar gasoline tax revenues that have been in place for decades, and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which allocates much of the revenue from the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall).

State taxes transferred to and allocated through the state Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) include:
• The per gallon “gasoline tax” and “diesel fuel tax” imposed on the use of vehicle fuels. • The “use fuel tax,” imposed on vendors and users of motor vehicle fuels that are not taxed under either the gasoline or diesel fuel tax, such as liquefied petroleum gas, ethanol, methanol and natural gas (both liquid and gaseous) for use on state highways. Use Fuel Tax rates vary depending on the type of fuel. • Variable rate per gallon gasoline diesel fuel excise taxes imposed in 2010-11 in a complicated arrangement known as the “fuel tax swap.” This rate replaced the previous Proposition 42 sales tax on gasoline.

Transportation taxes allocated to cities and counties through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) include:
• An additional 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
• An additional 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with half of the revenues going to the state Trade Corridor Enhancement Account (TCEA) and half to the RMRA. Annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020. • An additional vehicle registration tax called the “Transportation Improvement Fee” with rates based on the value of the motor vehicle effective January 1, 2018 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
• An additional $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emissions vehicles of model year 2020 or later effective July 1, 2020 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2021.

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) also adopted annual inflationary adjustments beginning July 1, 2020 to all per-gallon motor vehicle fuel excise taxes including the rates allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA).

1 Taxes on aircraft jet fuel are transferred to the state Aeronautics Account. 2217 Isle Royale Lane • Davis, CA • 95616-6616 • Tel 530.758.3952

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2103-2108 “HUTA” Cities and counties receive revenue from the motor vehicle fuel taxes imposed pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7360(a) and (b) through the Highway User Tax Account under the following formulas outlined in the Streets and Highways code and illustrated in Figure 1.

Section 2104. Section 2104 allocates funds to counties with designated allotments for engineering and administration, snow removal, heavy rainfall / storm damage as well as county streets, roads and public mass transit guideways and facilities.

Section 2105. Section 2105(a) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among counties based on population.

Section 2105(b) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among cities based on population.

Section 2106. Revenues equal to 1.04 cents per gallon are allocated as follows:
a. $7.2 million per year to the State Bicycle Transportation Account. b. $400 per month to each city ($2,308,800 per year among the 481 eligible cities2) c. $800 per month to each county ($556,800 per year among the 58 counties) d. The residual amount to each county and the cities in that county based on registered vehicles. In each county, from this amount, the county receives an allotment based on the share of assessed value of the county which is in the unincorporated area. The remainder is allocated to the cities within the county based on population.
2 The city of Rolling Hills has only private streets and is therefor not eligible to receive these allocations.

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Section 2107. This section provides monthly allocations to cities of 1.315 cents per gallon of gasoline, 1.8 cents per gallon of diesel, and 2.59 cents per liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as follows. a. Each city with snow removal costs in excess of $5,000 is allocated 50 percent of the cost exceeding $5,000.
b. The remainder is allocated to cities based on population.

Section 2107.5. These funds (about $2.7 million per year) are allocated to cities annually in July based on population as follows:

Section 2107.5 funds must be used for engineering costs and administrative expenses related to city streets. Cities with populations under 10,000 may also expend the moneys for street construction or acquisition of street rights-of-way.

Section 2103 HUTA and the 2010 Gasoline Sales Tax – Excise Tax Swap In March 2010 as a part of a special budget session called by Governor Schwarzenegger, the Legislature enacted a swap of state sales taxes on gasoline for a gasoline excise tax. Intended to be “revenue neutral,” the fuel tax swap provided the Legislature with greater flexibility in the use of funds, in particular relieving the general fund from the cost of state transportation debt service payments. The fuel tax swap:

1. Repealed the state sales tax on gasoline (local rates including the Bradley Burns are NOT affected);

2. Increased the excise tax on gasoline by 17.322 cents and added an annual adjustment mechanism intended to ensure the new excise tax provides, over time, the same amount of revenues expected from the sales tax on gas (no more, no less);

3. Increased the sales tax on diesel by 1.75 percent and allocated 75 percent to local transit agencies and 25 percent to state transit programs. The excise tax on diesel was reduced from 18 cents to 13.6 cents.

Sales tax revenues from diesel must go to transit funding.

4. Provided for a specific allocation of the funds among state and local transportation needs.

Revenues from the new Section 2103 excise tax rate are now allocated as follows:

1. State transportation debt service;

2. Remainder allocated:
a. 44 percent to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); b. 12 percent State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP); c. 44 percent evenly split between cities and counties using current HUTA formulas.

Section 2103 funds are allocated to cities on a per capita basis and to counties 75 percent based on the proportion of registered vehicles and 25 percent based on the proportion of maintained county road miles.

City Population Annual Allocation
over 500,000 $ 20,000
100,000 to 500,000 $ 10,000
50,000 to 99.999 $ 7,500
25,000 to 49,999 $ 6,000
20,000 to 24,999 $ 5,000
15,000 to 19,999 $ 4,000
10,000 to 14,999 $ 3,000
5,000 to 9,999 $ 2,000
less than 5,000 $ 1,000
Streets & Highway Code §2107.5

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
The law included expressed legislative intent to fully replace the local streets and road funds cities and counties would have received under Proposition 42 state sales tax on gasoline with allocations from the new higher motor vehicle excise tax (HUTA) rate.

However, the swap created certain revenue effects related to the timing and receipt of revenues. In particular, the law provided that the new excise tax rate be adjusted annually by the BOE to garner an amount of revenues equal to what Prop42 would have provided in the prior year. Thus, the annual Sec 2103 funds were always “looking backward.” If the Section 2103 amounts generated less than Prop42 would have, the difference was made up until the following year.

In the years following the swap, there were a number of snafus and changes in interpretation of the Section 2103 allocation. In FY2011-12 SCO allocated more money to cities and counties and did not fully backfill state transportation programs for weight fees that were used for debt service and loans that those funds would have otherwise received. This was contrary to the Legislature’s intention, but the statute was not clear. The statute was clarified in the 2013 budget to clarify the original intent of the weight fee swap to fully backfill state transportation funds. [Streets & Highways Code 2103 (a)(1)(D)].

The Section 2103 Local Streets and Roads allocation to cities and counties have varied and declined dramatically and, due to BOE’s failure to enact a rate increase in 2018, fell to $244 million for FY2018-19, about 5 percent down from prior year.

Changes to HUTA Allocated Rates, Including the Variable Rate by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall)
In addition to increasing various fuel and motor vehicle registration taxes, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) removed BOE’s discretionary rate setting role over the Section 2103 variable rate and reset the variable rate at 17.3 cents per gallon on July 1, 2019, up from the current 11.7 cents. This adjustment more than doubled Section 2103 revenue allocations for FY2019-20 over the prior year.

With regard to diesel fuel taxes, SB1 also eliminated the price-based adjustment mechanism applied to the diesel fuel tax rate.

On July 1, 2020, and every July 1 thereafter, the gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax rates including the 18 cent per gallon base rate, the 17.3 percent per gallon rate, the diesel fuel excise tax rate and vehicle registration taxes are increased by the change in the California Consumer Price Index.

Streets & Highways Code Section 2103 Variable Gas Tax Allocations to Cities and Counties

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Rates effective July 1, 2022
Effective Date Base Rate Sec2103 SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2010 $ 0.180 $ 0.173 $ 0.353
July 1, 2011 $ 0.180 $ 0.177 $ 0.357
July 1, 2012 $ 0.180 $ 0.180 $ 0.360
July 1, 2013 $ 0.180 $ 0.215 $ 0.395
July 1, 2014 $ 0.180 $ 0.180 $ 0.360
July 1, 2015 $ 0.180 $ 0.120 $ 0.300
July 1, 2016 $ 0.180 $ 0.098 $ 0.278
July 1, 2017 $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.297
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.120 $ 0.417
July 1, 2019 $ 0.180 $ 0.173 $ 0.120 $ 0.473
July 1, 2020 $ 0.192 $ 0.185 $ 0.128 $ 0.505
July 1, 2021 $ 0.194 $ 0.187 $ 0.130 $ 0.511
July 1, 2022 est $ 0.206 $ 0.198 $ 0.137 $ 0.541
California Gasoline Excise Tax Rates - Per Gallon
Effective Date Base Rate SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2017 $ 0.160 $ 0.160
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2019 $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2020 $ 0.171 $ 0.214 $ 0.385
July 1, 2021 $ 0.173 $ 0.216 $ 0.389
July 1, 2022 est $ 0.183 $ 0.228 $ 0.411
California Diesel Excise Tax Rates
Wt Fees ~$1.7 billion
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(1)
22%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(C)
22%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(C)
56%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(A-B)

51.2%
Str&Hw ys §2108

22.6% (i)
Str&Hw ys §2104

14.6% (i)
Str&Hw ys §2107
Counties (iv)
Cities (v)
State
Highway
Account
Allocation of Gasoline Excise Tax Revenues

54.1¢

10.3¢ Per Gal
§2105

10.3¢
§2104, §2106,
§2107,§2108
77% (iii) Str&Hw ys §2105

11.5% Str&Hw ys §2105b

11.5% Str&Hw ys §2105a

11.5% (i),(ii)
Str&Hw ys §2106 Cities and
Counties

19.8¢
§2103
Transportation
Debt Service
(State General
Remainder to...

Wt Fee Offset ~$1.2 billion
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(1)

13.7¢
§2036
Road
Maint.
and
Rehab.

Account
Rev&Tax §7360(a)
Rev&Tax §7360(b)
Rev&Tax §7360(c)
Highway Users Tax Acount

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Use of Funds: HUTA
The use of local Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds is restricted by Article XIX of the California State Constitution and by Streets and Highways Code Section 2101. All Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds allocated from the Highway Users Tax Account must be expended for the following:
(a) The research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways (and their related public facilities for nonmotorized traffic), including the mitigation of their environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes. (b) The research and planning for exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
(c) The construction and improvement of exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), including the mitigation of their environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes, and the maintenance of the structures and the immediate right-of-way for the public mass transit guideways. (d) The payment of principal and interest on voter-approved bonds issued for the purposes specified above.

Three Year State General Fund TCRF Loan Repayment Funds SB1 stipulated the repayment of $706 million by the state General Fund to transportation funds over three fiscal years: 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. Under SB1, $75 million was allocated to local streets and roads from repayments of Transportation Congestion Relief Funds (TCRF) in each of these three years. These funds were allocated half to cities and half to counties with the city funds allocated among cities on a per capita basis, the county funds allocated among counties based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage.

These TCRF revenues may be deposited in local HUTA funds.3 However, these TCRF funds carry slightly different
use requirements than HUTA funds. TCRF funds may be expended only for street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction or storm damage repair. For these purposes, • “Maintenance” means patching and/or overlay and sealing. • “Reconstruction” includes any overlay, sealing or widening of the roadway, if the widening is necessary to bring the roadway width to the state minimum standards, but does not include widening for the purpose of traffic capacity.
• “Storm damage repair” is repair or reconstruction of local streets and highways and related drainage improvements that have been damaged due to winter storms and flooding, and construction of drainage improvements to mitigate future roadway flooding and damage problems, in those jurisdictions that have been declared disaster areas by the President of the United States. 3 Note that the “loan repayment” is between the state general fund and state transportation funds. From an accounting standpoint this is NOT a debt repayment to local agencies, it is simply revenue.

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2031 “RMRA” The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) represented a significant additional investment in California’s transportation systems of over $5 billion per year. The Act increased per gallon fuel excise taxes, diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration taxes, stabilized the problematic price-based fuel tax rates and provided for inflationary adjustments to rates in future years. The Act is more than doubling local streets and road funds allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which it established.

The RMRA receives funds4
from the following new taxes imposed under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017:
• A 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017. • A 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017, half of which will be allocated to Trade Corridors Enhancement Account (TCEA) with the remaining half to the RMRA. • A new vehicle registration tax called the “transportation improvement fee,” effective January 1, 2018, based on the market value of the vehicle.
• An additional new $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emission vehicles model year 2020 and later effective July 1, 2020.
• Annual rate increases to these taxes beginning July 1, 2020 (July 1, 2021 for the ZEV fee), and every July 1 thereafter for the change in the California Consumer Price Index. The first adjustment made on July 1, 2020 covered CPI change for two years: November 1, 2017 through November 12, 2019. 4 In addition, funds from a 4 percent increase in the diesel sales tax to 5.75 percent from the prior 1.75 percent effective November 1, 2017 are allocated to the Public Transportation Account.

Effective Date
Vehicle Value Jan 2018 Jan 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022
0 - $4,999 $ 25 $ 27 $ 27 $ 28
$5,000 - $24,999 $ 52 $ 54 $ 55 $ 56
$25,000 - $34,999 $ 105 $ 107 $ 110 $ 112
$35,000 - $59,999 $ 157 $ 161 $ 165 $ 168
$60,000 & over $ 183 $ 188 $ 192 $ 196
SB1 Transportation Improvement Fee

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
The Road Repair and Accountability Act directs the State Controller to allocate, on a monthly basis, fifty percent of the revenues in the RMRA to the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOP) in the State Highway Account and half to cities and counties. But there are a series of specific program allocations, subject to appropriation in the annual state budget, to be taken out first:

1. Administrative costs.

2. $200 million for the State-Local-Partnership Program for existing and aspiring self-help jurisdictions.

3. $100 million annually for the Active Transportation Program for the purpose of encouraging increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking.

4. $400 million for state bridge and culvert maintenance and rehabilitation.

5. $25 million for the state’s Freeway Service Patrol program.

6. $5 million for five years through FY 2021-22 for pre-apprenticeship training programs of the California Workforce Development Board.

7. $25 million for local planning grants to encourage local and regional planning.

8. $7 million for transportation research and transportation-related workforce education, training, and development including $5 million to the University of California and $2 million to the California State University.

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Use of Funds: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Section 2030] The use of RMRA local streets and roads funds is similar but, not identical, to HUTA use rules. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2030, RMRA local streets and roads allocations must be used for projects “that include, but are not limited to,” the following
• Road maintenance and rehabilitation
• Safety projects
• Railroad grade separations
• Traffic control devices
• Complete street components, “including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm-water capture projects in conjunction with any other allowable project.”
RMRA funds may also be used to satisfy a match requirement for projects eligible for state or federal funds.

SB1 also contains non-obligatory intent language regarding the use of funds. “To the extent possible and cost effective,” cities and counties are to use a use:
• advanced recycling techniques that reduce greenhouse gas emissions; • automotive technologies, ZEV fueling, infrastructure-to-vehicle; • communications autonomous vehicle systems;

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
• resiliency re climate change, fires, floods, sea level rise; and • complete street elements, access for bicycles, pedestrians.

If a city or county has an average Pavement Condition Index that meets or exceeds 80, the city or county may spend its RMRA funds on transportation priorities other than these. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2037] Maintenance of Effort: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2036] The Road Repair and Accountability Act contains a local agency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds allocated through the RMRA. The Act states that the MOE requirement is to ensure that these new roads funds do not supplant existing levels of city and county general revenue spending on streets and roads. The MOE for the receipt of RMRA funds state that a city or county must maintain general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than average of 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 years. In making this calculation an agency may exclude one-time funds. A city or county that fails to comply in a particular year may make it up with in additional expenditures in the following year.

The Act provides that the State Controller may perform audits to ensure compliance with these MOE rules. If the State Controller determines that a city or county has not met its MOE, the agency will be required to reimburse the state for the funds it received during that fiscal year. However, a city or county that fails to comply in a particular fiscal year may expend during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is sufficient to comply. Any funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply will be reapportioned to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in compliance.

For further guidance, see the State Controller’s “Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties.”
Spending Plans and Reports: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034] The Road Repair and Accountability Act stipulates that, prior to receiving RMRA funds in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a project list pursuant to an adopted budget. The list must include for each project: description, location, schedule, useful life. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034(a)]
The Road Repair and Accountability Act also requires that a city or county submit to the CTC an annual report of project completion in order to receive RMRA funds. The report must include descriptions of all projects for which RMRA funds were expended including: description, location, funds expended, completion date, estimated useful life of the project.

There are no additional use or reporting requirements on Highway Users Tax Account funds (Streets and Highways Code Sec 2103-2107) or on the three year transportation loan repayment funds.

Budgeting and Accounting for RMRA Funds: The ~60 Day Delay The allocation of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues to cities and counties takes many weeks. It takes the State Controller’s Office roughly 30 to 60 days from the time of revenue collection by the state, through the various statutory set asides to distribute the funds to cities and counties in monthly allocations. Consequently, the estimates shown in this report are for revenues collected for July through June are not received on a cash basis by local agencies until September through August. That is, for example, the FY2022-23 figure for your agency is revenues collected in and for July 2022 through June 2023 but distributed in

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
monthly allocations September 2022 through August 2023. Cities and counties thus have two choices in the budgeting and accounting of RMRA revenues:
1) apply a 60 day accrual policy to RMRA funds (recommended); or 2) adjust RMRA budgets (especially in FY2017-18) to reflect a distributed cash basis.

Local Streets and Roads (HUTA and RMRA) Revenue Estimates for FY2021-22 and FY2021-23
We have computed revenue estimates for each city and county using a model reflecting the local allocation formulas, latest population figures used by the State Controller for allocations and estimates by the state Department of Finance (DOF) of statewide HUTA and RMRA tax revenues provided in the Governor’s Proposed 2022-23 Budget (released January 10, 2022) and analyses of SB1(Beall), The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Fuel consumption was sharply down during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic but has largely recovered to its prior, slightly declining trajectory. Recently, fuel prices have increased steeply but the price of fuel no longer has a direct effect on local streets and roads revenues because all rates are per gallon, regardless of price.

Despite lower fuel consumption, scheduled rate increases stipulated in SB1 have kept local allocations of revenue growing at a modest pace. Total 2019-20 LSR allocations (including HUTA, TCRF, and RMRA) were 4.0 percent above 2018-19. Allocations in 2020-21 were 2.8 percent up from 2019-20. For the current year FY2021-22, the Department of Finance currently projects total LSR allocations to cities and counties will be

14.8 percent above the prior year. For the budget year FY2022-23, DOF estimates total local streets and roads allocations will grow 10.8 percent.

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
 Governor’s Proposal to Suspend the Annual Fuel Tax Rate Adjustments In his FY 2022-23 Proposed Budget, the Governor floats the idea of a fuel tax increase suspension for 2022.

That is, the fuel tax rate increases that would otherwise occur under SB1 would be suspended for one year.

Because these growth factors are based on computed inflation relative to 2017, if this suspension is for one year, the 2023 adjustment would bring rates up to where they would otherwise have been and the revenue effect would be for one year only.

The revenue figures contained in the Proposed Budget reflect a full funding of state and local transportation programs under HUTA and RMRA. They do NOT reflect this fuel tax suspension. Moreover, both the Governor and Legislature have indicated their commitment to backfill any revenue impact on local streets and roads allocations so as to hold those allocations harmless. Consequently, these estimates reflect those full allocations.

HUTA (Highway Users Tax Account)
Revenues allocated to cities and counties through HUTA under Sections 2103-2107 of the Streets and Highways Code are derived from per gallon rates. As described above, these rates are adjusted annually on July

1. Revenue changes depend on the combined effects of 1) these rate adjustments, 2) taxable gallonage, and 3) the relative change of statutory transfers including the “weight fee offset” that pays state transportation bond debt.

Statewide fuel consumption (gallons) had been relatively flat in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions caused a steep decline in fuel consumption in the spring of 2020. The effects of this are expected to ease up gradually as restrictions are lifted and travel resumes. Sec2104-2108 HUTA allocations (not including RMRA or the sec2103 variable fuel taxes) dropped 6.5 percent in 2019-20 from the prior 2018- 19 year. But this drop-off was more than offset by the doubling of the Sec2103 allocations due to the reset of the formerly price-based rate. FY2019-20 contained the most dramatic fiscal and economic effects of the pandemic, those during the months of April through June 2020.

With a recovery in fuel consumption as the COVID effects begin to ease and with additional rate adjustments kicking in each July 1, DOF estimates total HUTA revenue growth in FY 2021-22 of 18.0 percent and 11.4 percent growth in FY2022-23.

RMRA (Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account)5
The Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB1) taxes that provide funding to cities and counties through the RMRA began on November 1, 2017 when the new per-gallon fuel excise taxes took effect. On January 1, 2018, the new vehicle registration tax, the “Transportation Improvement Fee,” took effect. Cities, counties and other recipients of these revenues saw the first full year of these revenues in FY2018-19. A $100 zero emission vehicle registration tax began on July 1, 2020.

DOF now estimates FY2021-22 RMRA revenues will be 11.0 percent higher than FY2020-21 actuals and that FY2022-23 revenues will grow by 9.5 percent over the current year.

Why does city/county RMRA growth differ from city/county HUTA growth? Under SB1, various fixed-amount statutory allocations are made from the new SB1 tax rates prior to the city and county allocations. 5 Note that RMRA revenues are delayed 60 days from collection to allocation. That is, the revenues for a July 1 to June 30 fiscal year are allocated September 1 through August 31. These are spendable in the fiscal year because your accounting staff “accrues” them back into your fiscal year.

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
An individual city’s allocations will of course also be affected by change in the city’s population relative to the change in state population. Changes for allocations to counties will be affected other factors in the allocation rules including relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles.

California Local Streets and Roads Program - State Funds to Cities and Counties Looking Ahead: Long Term Estimates of Local Streets and Roads Funding Assuming a gradual recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, we can expect stable, modest year over year growth in local streets and roads revenues in future years. While fuel consumption may remain flat overall, annual cost of living adjustments will help to maintain revenues.

Due to complicated statutory transfers from these revenues before the city and county allocations are made (including the $1.7 billion transfer for state transportation debt service), actual growth in funding allocated to cities and counties varies somewhat among the various categories of local streets and roads allocations and will not exactly mirror total tax collections. Taking all these factors into account, for the purposes of long-term transportation program planning, we estimate transportation allocations to cities and counties will increase in outyears at the following growth rates:
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 FY24-25 FY25-26 Millions
§2103
cities&counties
§2104
counties
§2106
§2107
cities
estimated projected >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Road
Maintenance
&
Rehabilitation
Account TCRF loan
repayment
H.U.T.A.
§2105
cities&counties
Estimated Annual Revenue Growth Rate over prior year
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Beyond
HUTA 2103 1.3% 0.7% 0.8% -0.8% 0.5%
HUTA 2104 1.9% 2.3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8%
HUTA 2105 1.9% 2.3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8%
HUTA 2106 county 1.7% 2.1% 1.0% 1.3% 1.5%
HUTA 2106 city 2.1% 2.5% 1.3% 1.7% 1.9%
HUTA 2107 1.9% 2.3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8%
RMRA 5.0% 5.3% 6.0% 7.2% 5.9%

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
Allocations to each particular city also will be affected by annual changes in the city’s population relative to the change in state population in cities. The current forecast for California population, provided by the Demographics Unit of the California Department of Finance is as follows:6 If you think your city’s population growth will be significantly different from the statewide average in cities, then you should adjust accordingly. For example, the City of Agartha’s planning department estimates the city will see average annual residential population growth of 1.5 percent annually over the next ten years. The city’s estimated HUTA 2105 allocation for FY2022-23 is $381,200. The long term projection of Section 2105 revenue would be:
$381,200 x Sec2105 growth x Agartha Population Growth ÷ Statewide City Population Growth So, for 2023-24, the city would estimate $381,200 x 1.019 x 1.015 ÷ 1.0057 = $391,149 And long term …
Changes for allocations to counties will be affected by other factors in the allocation rules, including relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles. mjgc
ATTACHMENTS:

A) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2021-22 B) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2022-23 C) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2021-22 D) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2022-23 6 See http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/projections/ . California population in cities estimated by author based on recent historic trend of proportion of population in cities.

California 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Population 39,466,855 39,657,243 39,862,922 40,080,241 40,311,181 40,529,241 40,742,869 40,951,365 Population in Cities 33,012,988 33,188,953 33,377,891 33,576,762 33,787,241 33,987,124 34,183,479 34,375,717 percent change 0.53% 0.57% 0.60% 0.63% 0.59% 0.58% 0.56% 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Population 41,153,499 41,350,915 41,539,031 41,717,426 41,886,845 42,047,279 42,198,325 Population in Cities 34,562,797 34,746,091 34,921,744 35,089,387 35,249,638 35,402,476 35,547,550 percent change 0.54% 0.53% 0.51% 0.48% 0.46% 0.43% 0.41% 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 HUTA Sec2015 381,200 $
2105 growth 1.9% 2.3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8% 1.8%
Agartha pop 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5%
Cities pop 0.57% 0.60% 0.63% 0.59% 0.58% 0.56%
HUTA Sec2015 392,035 $ 404,640 $ 413,036 $ 423,440 $ 434,792 $ 446,536 $

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 478,398 685,902 269,238 651,953 7,500 2,092,992 1,675,310 3,768,301 ALBANY 109,651 157,212 65,411 149,431 4,000 485,704 383,989 869,693 BERKELEY 690,596 990,142 386,533 941,134 10,000 3,018,406 2,418,412 5,436,818 DUBLIN 382,646 548,618 216,311 521,464 7,500 1,676,539 1,339,995 3,016,535 EMERYVILLE 74,441 106,730 45,948 101,448 3,000 331,567 260,688 592,255 FREMONT 1,385,434 1,986,364 770,610 1,888,048 10,000 6,040,456 4,851,675 10,892,131 HAYWARD 935,036 1,340,606 521,649 1,274,252 10,000 4,081,543 3,274,418 7,355,961 LIVERMORE 539,508 773,518 303,017 735,233 7,500 2,358,776 1,889,311 4,248,087 NEWARK 288,982 414,328 164,537 393,821 6,000 1,267,668 1,011,992 2,279,660 OAKLAND 2,575,898 3,693,191 1,428,649 3,510,395 10,000 11,218,132 9,020,583 20,238,715 PIEDMONT 66,812 95,791 41,731 91,050 3,000 298,383 233,968 532,351 PLEASANTON 463,534 664,592 261,022 631,698 7,500 2,028,346 1,623,259 3,651,605 SAN LEANDRO 516,281 740,217 290,179 703,580 7,500 2,257,756 1,807,973 4,065,730 UNION CITY 430,460 617,171 242,740 586,624 7,500 1,884,495 1,507,435 3,391,930

ALPINE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,094 1,569 5,604 1,491 1,000 10,758 3,832 14,590 IONE 46,832 67,145 39,206 63,822 2,000 219,005 164,002 383,006 JACKSON 27,509 39,441 25,010 37,489 1,000 130,448 96,334 226,782 PLYMOUTH 5,944 8,522 9,167 8,101 1,000 32,734 20,816 53,550 SUTTER CREEK 14,792 21,209 15,668 20,159 1,000 72,828 51,802 124,630

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 10,215 14,645 10,295 13,920 1,000 50,075 35,770 85,845 CHICO 659,421 945,443 359,540 898,648 10,000 2,873,052 2,309,236 5,182,288 GRIDLEY 38,942 55,833 25,749 53,069 2,000 175,593 136,371 311,964 OROVILLE 105,653 151,480 61,637 143,982 4,000 466,751 369,987 836,738 PARADISE 155,069 222,331 88,221 243,742 6,000 715,363 543,040 1,258,403

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 23,883 34,243 28,138 32,548 1,000 119,811 83,637 203,448

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 37,073 53,153 18,218 50,522 2,000 160,966 129,826 290,792 WILLIAMS 32,453 46,530 16,546 44,227 2,000 141,757 113,649 255,407 Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 667,453 956,959 400,983 909,594 10,000 2,944,989 2,337,364 5,282,353 BRENTWOOD 390,938 560,507 236,851 532,765 7,500 1,728,561 1,369,034 3,097,596 CLAYTON 66,646 95,553 44,359 90,824 3,000 300,383 233,388 533,771 CONCORD 764,600 1,096,244 458,647 1,041,985 10,000 3,371,477 2,677,567 6,049,044 DANVILLE 259,687 372,326 158,944 353,898 6,000 1,150,854 909,403 2,060,257 EL CERRITO 146,955 210,696 92,028 200,267 5,000 654,946 514,623 1,169,569 HERCULES 152,976 219,329 95,602 208,473 6,000 682,379 535,708 1,218,088 LAFAYETTE 149,983 215,038 93,826 204,394 6,000 669,241 525,228 1,194,468 MARTINEZ 217,818 312,296 134,091 296,838 6,000 967,043 762,779 1,729,822 MORAGA 99,484 142,635 63,851 135,575 4,000 445,545 348,384 793,929 OAKLEY 253,707 363,753 155,394 345,749 6,000 1,124,603 888,463 2,013,066 ORINDA 112,839 161,783 71,778 153,775 4,000 504,176 395,153 899,329 PINOLE 114,560 164,251 72,800 156,121 4,000 511,732 401,180 912,912 PITTSBURG 440,627 631,748 266,345 600,480 7,500 1,946,700 1,543,040 3,489,740 PLEASANT HILL 201,884 289,450 124,633 275,124 6,000 897,091 706,980 1,604,070 RICHMOND 651,377 933,910 391,440 887,686 10,000 2,874,414 2,281,067 5,155,481 SAN PABLO 183,596 263,230 113,778 250,201 6,000 816,804 642,937 1,459,741 SAN RAMON 496,017 711,164 299,223 675,965 7,500 2,189,870 1,737,012 3,926,882 WALNUT CREEK 421,813 604,773 255,177 574,840 7,500 1,864,103 1,477,153 3,341,256

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 45,205 64,813 24,714 61,605 2,000 198,337 158,306 356,643

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 64,398 92,331 60,668 87,761 3,000 308,158 225,518 533,676 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 138,390 198,417 124,858 1,233,784 5,000 1,700,449 484,631 2,185,080 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 720,601 1,033,161 356,479 982,025 10,000 3,102,266 2,523,487 5,625,753 COALINGA 106,978 153,379 57,009 145,788 4,000 467,153 374,627 841,780 FIREBAUGH 48,062 68,909 28,256 65,498 2,000 212,726 168,310 381,035 FOWLER 39,042 55,977 23,854 53,206 2,000 174,080 136,723 310,803 FRESNO 3,233,935 4,636,650 1,583,074 4,407,157 20,000 13,880,815 11,324,973 25,205,788 HURON 43,792 62,786 26,172 59,679 2,000 194,429 153,355 347,784 KERMAN 95,332 136,682 51,325 129,917 4,000 417,256 333,844 751,100 KINGSBURG 77,387 110,953 42,568 105,462 3,000 339,369 271,002 610,372 MENDOTA 73,625 105,560 40,732 100,335 3,000 323,252 257,829 581,081 ORANGE COVE 56,668 81,248 32,456 77,226 2,000 249,598 198,446 448,044 PARLIER 93,617 134,223 50,488 127,579 4,000 409,907 327,837 737,744 REEDLEY 154,295 221,220 80,101 210,270 6,000 671,886 540,327 1,212,213 SANGER 161,782 231,955 83,756 220,475 6,000 703,968 566,549 1,270,517 SAN JOAQUIN 24,516 35,150 16,765 33,410 1,000 110,841 85,853 196,694 SELMA 144,831 207,652 75,483 197,374 5,000 630,339 507,187 1,137,526

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 50,434 72,310 26,576 68,731 2,000 220,050 176,615 396,666 WILLOWS 36,866 52,856 20,718 50,240 2,000 162,680 129,101 291,781

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 101,915 146,120 72,886 138,888 4,000 463,808 356,897 820,705 BLUE LAKE 7,464 10,702 9,787 10,172 1,000 39,125 26,139 65,264 EUREKA 160,824 230,582 112,241 219,169 6,000 728,816 563,194 1,292,010 FERNDALE 8,109 11,626 10,217 11,051 1,000 42,003 28,397 70,400 FORTUNA 70,538 101,133 51,924 96,128 3,000 322,723 247,017 569,740 RIO DELL 19,920 28,561 18,108 27,147 1,000 94,737 69,760 164,496TRINIDAD 2,171 3,112 6,250 2,958 1,000 15,491 7,601 23,093

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 161,623 231,726 96,437 220,257 6,000 716,044 565,990 1,282,033 CALEXICO 239,453 343,316 140,566 326,323 6,000 1,055,658 838,546 1,894,204 CALIPATRIA 45,572 65,339 30,639 62,105 2,000 205,655 159,590 365,244 EL CENTRO 266,140 381,578 155,697 362,692 6,000 1,172,106 932,000 2,104,106 HOLTVILLE 36,884 52,882 25,712 50,264 2,000 167,742 129,163 296,905 IMPERIAL 120,002 172,052 72,839 163,536 4,000 532,429 420,236 952,665 WESTMORLAND 13,633 19,547 12,530 18,579 1,000 65,289 47,742 113,031

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 23,209 33,276 18,781 31,629 1,000 107,894 81,276 189,170 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 130,204 186,680 55,550 177,441 5,000 554,875 455,965 1,010,840 BAKERSFIELD 2,350,421 3,369,913 920,920 3,203,118 10,000 9,854,373 8,230,981 18,085,354 CALIFORNIA CITY 83,514 119,739 37,351 113,812 3,000 357,416 292,460 649,877 DELANO 313,717 449,792 127,077 427,529 7,500 1,325,615 1,098,612 2,424,226 MARICOPA 6,825 9,786 7,460 9,302 1,000 34,373 23,902 58,276 MCFARLAND 83,065 119,094 37,176 113,200 3,000 355,535 290,886 646,421 RIDGECREST 175,019 250,934 73,017 238,514 6,000 743,484 612,904 1,356,388 SHAFTER 120,942 173,401 51,939 164,818 5,000 516,100 423,529 939,629 TAFT 55,166 79,094 26,302 75,179 2,000 237,740 193,185 430,925 TEHACHAPI 85,253 122,232 38,029 116,182 3,000 364,696 298,550 663,246 WASCO 158,600 227,393 66,617 216,138 6,000 674,749 555,406 1,230,155

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 91,706 131,484 41,516 124,976 4,000 393,682 321,147 714,829 CORCORAN 146,759 210,416 63,558 200,001 5,000 625,735 513,939 1,139,674 HANFORD 354,765 508,643 146,836 483,468 7,500 1,501,212 1,242,356 2,743,568 LEMOORE 158,565 227,342 68,284 216,090 6,000 676,281 555,281 1,231,563

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 90,198 129,321 48,047 122,920 4,000 394,486 315,866 710,352 LAKEPORT 28,236 40,484 18,338 38,480 1,000 126,539 98,881 225,420

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 106,150 152,192 46,950 227,246 4,000 536,537 371,727 908,265

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 120,995 173,477 72,026 164,891 5,000 536,388 423,716 960,104 ALHAMBRA 510,183 731,474 288,260 695,270 7,500 2,232,687 1,786,619 4,019,305 ARCADIA 341,037 488,961 194,282 464,760 7,500 1,496,539 1,194,283 2,690,822ARTESIA 97,721 140,108 59,094 133,173 4,000 434,097 342,212 776,308AVALON 23,499 33,691 17,856 32,024 1,000 108,070 82,291 190,361 AZUSA 293,288 420,501 167,752 399,689 6,000 1,287,230 1,027,071 2,314,301 BALDWIN PARK 449,126 643,934 254,337 612,063 7,500 1,966,960 1,572,804 3,539,764BELL 214,813 307,988 124,151 292,744 6,000 945,696 752,257 1,697,953BELLFLOWER 458,134 656,850 259,342 624,338 7,500 2,006,164 1,604,349 3,610,513 BELL GARDENS 249,792 358,139 143,586 340,413 6,000 1,097,929 874,751 1,972,680 BEVERLY HILLS 201,742 289,247 116,889 274,930 6,000 888,808 706,483 1,595,290 BRADBURY 6,199 8,887 8,244 8,447 1,000 32,777 21,707 54,484 BURBANK 614,937 881,665 346,462 838,026 10,000 2,691,090 2,153,458 4,844,547 CALABASAS 143,968 206,413 84,789 196,197 5,000 636,367 504,163 1,140,530 CARSON 542,453 777,741 306,190 739,247 7,500 2,373,131 1,899,626 4,272,757 CERRITOS 296,015 424,411 169,267 403,404 6,000 1,299,097 1,036,619 2,335,716 CLAREMONT 211,193 302,798 122,140 287,811 6,000 929,942 739,581 1,669,523 COMMERCE 75,843 108,740 46,939 103,358 3,000 337,880 265,596 603,476 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL COMPTON 578,302 829,139 326,107 788,101 7,500 2,529,148 2,025,165 4,554,313 COVINA 288,828 414,107 165,274 393,611 6,000 1,267,821 1,011,453 2,279,275 CUDAHY 140,797 201,868 83,028 191,877 5,000 622,570 493,061 1,115,631 CULVER CITY 235,431 337,549 135,607 320,842 6,000 1,035,430 824,461 1,859,891 DIAMOND BAR 335,459 480,964 191,183 457,159 7,500 1,472,265 1,174,751 2,647,016 DOWNEY 661,088 947,835 372,104 900,921 10,000 2,891,948 2,315,077 5,207,026 DUARTE 126,910 181,957 75,312 172,951 5,000 562,130 444,428 1,006,558 EL MONTE 688,846 987,632 387,526 938,749 10,000 3,012,752 2,412,281 5,425,033 EL SEGUNDO 98,538 141,278 59,548 134,285 4,000 437,649 345,070 782,719 GARDENA 356,912 511,722 203,102 486,394 7,500 1,565,629 1,249,875 2,815,504 GLENDALE 1,205,600 1,728,527 674,637 1,642,973 10,000 5,261,737 4,221,911 9,483,649 GLENDORA 304,839 437,063 174,170 415,430 7,500 1,339,003 1,067,522 2,406,525 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 85,567 122,681 52,341 116,609 3,000 380,198 299,648 679,846 HAWTHORNE 514,566 737,758 290,695 701,242 7,500 2,251,761 1,801,967 4,053,728 HERMOSA BEACH 115,370 165,412 68,900 157,225 4,000 510,908 404,018 914,926 HIDDEN HILLS 11,315 16,222 11,086 15,419 1,000 55,043 39,623 94,666 HUNTINGTON PARK 348,590 499,790 198,478 475,053 7,500 1,529,411 1,220,733 2,750,143 INDUSTRY 2,667 3,825 6,282 3,635 1,000 17,409 9,341 26,751 INGLEWOOD 651,548 934,156 366,803 887,920 10,000 2,850,428 2,281,668 5,132,096 IRWINDALE 8,523 12,220 9,535 11,615 1,000 42,893 29,847 72,740 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 119,747 171,688 71,332 163,190 5,000 530,957 419,345 950,302 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 32,241 46,225 22,713 43,937 2,000 147,115 112,904 260,019 LAKEWOOD 474,459 680,255 268,412 646,585 7,500 2,077,210 1,661,515 3,738,725 LA MIRADA 287,634 412,394 164,611 391,983 6,000 1,262,622 1,007,270 2,269,891 LANCASTER 954,453 1,368,446 535,099 1,300,715 10,000 4,168,713 3,342,417 7,511,131 LA PUENTE 237,099 339,941 136,533 323,115 6,000 1,042,689 830,302 1,872,990 LA VERNE 195,679 280,555 113,520 266,669 6,000 862,423 685,252 1,547,675 LAWNDALE 193,816 277,884 112,485 264,130 6,000 854,314 678,728 1,533,042 LOMITA 120,842 173,256 71,940 164,681 5,000 535,719 423,177 958,896 LONG BEACH 2,766,443 3,966,385 1,541,849 3,770,067 10,000 12,054,744 9,687,857 21,742,601 LOS ANGELES 23,205,055 33,270,219 12,897,640 31,623,497 20,000 101,016,411 81,262,195 182,278,605 LYNWOOD 413,313 592,588 234,439 563,257 7,500 1,811,097 1,447,389 3,258,486 MALIBU 74,790 107,231 46,354 101,923 3,000 333,298 261,910 595,207 MANHATTAN BEACH 207,810 297,947 120,260 283,200 6,000 915,218 727,734 1,642,952 MAYWOOD 163,657 234,644 95,729 223,030 6,000 723,060 573,115 1,296,175 MONROVIA 227,589 326,305 131,249 310,154 6,000 1,001,297 796,996 1,798,293 MONTEBELLO 372,112 533,515 211,547 507,109 7,500 1,631,784 1,303,106 2,934,890 MONTEREY PARK 357,125 512,027 203,220 486,684 7,500 1,566,555 1,250,621 2,817,176 NORWALK 624,282 895,063 351,654 850,762 10,000 2,731,761 2,186,184 4,917,944PALMDALE 923,118 1,323,519 517,689 1,258,011 10,000 4,032,336 3,232,682 7,265,019 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 79,481 113,955 48,960 108,315 3,000 353,711 278,335 632,045 PARAMOUNT 326,487 468,100 186,198 444,931 7,500 1,433,216 1,143,330 2,576,546 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL PASADENA 859,429 1,232,206 482,303 1,171,217 10,000 3,755,155 3,009,650 6,764,805 PICO RIVERA 373,549 535,576 212,346 509,067 7,500 1,638,039 1,308,139 2,946,178 POMONA 894,994 1,283,196 502,063 1,219,684 10,000 3,909,937 3,134,195 7,044,131 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 246,302 353,136 141,647 335,657 6,000 1,082,742 862,531 1,945,272 REDONDO BEACH 394,789 566,028 224,147 538,012 7,500 1,730,475 1,382,518 3,112,993 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 47,897 68,672 31,412 65,273 2,000 215,252 167,730 382,982 ROSEMEAD 320,744 459,866 183,007 437,105 7,500 1,408,221 1,123,218 2,531,439 SAN DIMAS 201,115 288,348 116,540 274,076 6,000 886,079 704,287 1,590,366 SAN FERNANDO 146,410 209,916 86,146 199,526 6,000 647,998 512,717 1,160,716 SAN GABRIEL 236,259 338,737 136,067 321,971 6,000 1,039,033 827,361 1,866,394 SAN MARINO 77,759 111,488 48,004 105,969 3,000 346,220 272,307 618,527 SANTA CLARITA 1,310,513 1,878,947 732,927 1,785,948 10,000 5,718,335 4,589,310 10,307,645 SANTA FE SPRINGS 107,226 153,735 64,375 146,126 4,000 475,463 375,497 850,960 SANTA MONICA 549,870 788,375 310,310 749,355 7,500 2,405,410 1,925,600 4,331,010 SIERRA MADRE 64,570 92,577 40,675 87,995 3,000 288,817 226,118 514,935 SIGNAL HILL 68,710 98,513 42,976 93,637 3,000 306,836 240,617 547,453 SOUTH EL MONTE 125,958 180,592 74,783 171,653 5,000 557,985 441,093 999,079 SOUTH GATE 571,074 818,777 322,091 778,251 7,500 2,497,693 1,999,854 4,497,547 SOUTH PASADENA 151,816 217,667 89,150 206,893 6,000 671,526 531,648 1,203,174 TEMPLE CITY 214,257 307,191 123,842 291,986 6,000 943,276 750,310 1,693,586 TORRANCE 860,210 1,233,325 482,737 1,172,281 10,000 3,758,553 3,012,384 6,770,937 VERNON 1,745 2,502 5,769 2,378 1,000 13,394 6,110 19,504 WALNUT 176,463 253,003 102,843 240,481 6,000 778,790 617,957 1,396,747 WEST COVINA 627,529 899,719 353,458 855,187 10,000 2,745,893 2,197,555 4,943,447 WEST HOLLYWOOD 213,666 306,343 123,514 291,180 6,000 940,702 748,239 1,688,941 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 48,914 70,130 31,977 66,659 2,000 219,680 171,292 390,972 WHITTIER 509,816 730,948 288,056 694,770 7,500 2,231,091 1,785,335 4,016,425 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 110,722 158,747 42,779 150,890 4,000 467,137 387,738 854,875 MADERA 391,382 561,143 139,049 533,369 7,500 1,632,444 1,370,587 3,003,031

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 12,231 17,537 12,414 16,669 1,000 59,851 42,833 102,684 CORTE MADERA 59,318 85,047 41,724 80,837 3,000 269,926 207,726 477,652 FAIRFAX 44,348 63,584 32,406 60,436 2,000 202,774 155,302 358,076 LARKSPUR 72,123 103,406 49,695 98,288 3,000 326,512 252,568 579,080 MILL VALLEY 86,058 123,385 58,370 117,278 3,000 388,091 301,367 689,457 NOVATO 316,349 453,565 201,723 431,116 7,500 1,410,253 1,107,829 2,518,082 ROSS 15,065 21,599 14,177 20,530 1,000 72,370 52,755 125,125 SAN ANSELMO 75,051 107,604 51,518 102,278 3,000 339,450 262,821 602,271 SAN RAFAEL 349,057 500,460 222,083 475,690 7,500 1,554,790 1,222,369 2,777,159 SAUSALITO 43,502 62,371 31,879 59,284 2,000 199,036 152,340 351,377 TIBURON 55,929 80,188 39,615 76,219 2,000 253,950 195,857 449,807

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 43,821 62,829 32,795 59,719 2,000 201,165 153,459 354,624 POINT ARENA 2,656 3,808 6,497 3,619 1,000 17,579 9,300 26,879 UKIAH 95,077 136,317 65,540 129,570 4,000 430,505 332,953 763,459 WILLITS 29,810 42,740 23,844 40,624 2,000 139,017 104,391 243,408

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 188,144 269,751 85,287 256,400 6,000 805,582 658,865 1,464,447 DOS PALOS 32,974 47,276 18,906 44,936 2,000 146,093 115,472 261,565 GUSTINE 34,571 49,566 19,589 47,113 2,000 152,839 121,065 273,904 LIVINGSTON 91,369 131,000 43,887 124,516 4,000 394,773 319,967 714,739 LOS BANOS 253,554 363,532 113,269 345,539 6,000 1,081,894 887,924 1,969,818 MERCED 538,059 771,441 234,979 733,258 7,500 2,285,236 1,884,237 4,169,473

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 17,070 24,473 12,472 24,743 1,000 79,758 59,776 139,534

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 48,701 69,825 59,478 1,918,387 2,000 2,098,390 170,547 2,268,937 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 23,795 34,115 14,804 32,427 1,000 106,140 83,326 189,467 DEL REY OAKS 9,877 14,162 8,953 13,461 1,000 47,453 34,590 82,042 GONZALES 50,215 71,996 25,911 68,432 2,000 218,555 175,849 394,404 GREENFIELD 108,841 156,050 50,559 148,327 4,000 467,776 381,151 848,928 KING CITY 88,583 127,006 42,042 120,720 3,000 381,351 310,211 691,562 MARINA 129,648 185,883 59,307 176,683 6,000 557,521 454,018 1,011,539 MONTEREY 167,869 240,681 75,375 228,769 6,000 718,694 587,862 1,306,556 PACIFIC GROVE 91,889 131,746 43,432 125,226 4,000 396,294 321,789 718,083 SALINAS 947,557 1,358,559 403,171 1,291,316 10,000 4,010,603 3,318,267 7,328,870 SAND CITY 2,277 3,265 5,757 3,103 1,000 15,403 7,974 23,377 SEASIDE 195,330 280,054 86,921 266,193 6,000 834,498 684,030 1,518,529 SOLEDAD 152,230 218,260 68,801 207,457 6,000 652,748 533,098 1,185,847

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 123,036 176,402 59,637 167,671 5,000 531,747 430,861 962,608 CALISTOGA 31,584 45,284 18,877 43,042 2,000 140,787 110,605 251,392 NAPA 469,603 673,292 214,101 639,968 7,500 2,004,464 1,644,510 3,648,974SAINT HELENA 35,902 51,474 20,801 48,926 2,000 159,103 125,725 284,828YOUNTVILLE 17,348 24,872 12,532 23,641 1,000 79,392 60,750 140,142

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 76,062 109,054 104,859 103,656 3,000 396,631 266,363 662,994 NEVADA CITY 18,223 26,127 28,772 24,834 1,000 98,956 63,815 162,771 TRUCKEE 95,894 137,487 130,948 1,740,605 4,000 2,108,934 335,812 2,444,746 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 294,625 422,418 182,622 401,510 7,500 1,308,675 1,031,752 2,340,426 ANAHEIM 2,090,627 2,997,435 1,266,607 2,849,075 10,000 9,213,744 7,321,205 16,534,949 BREA 266,968 382,765 165,930 363,820 6,000 1,185,483 934,900 2,120,383 BUENA PARK 482,786 692,194 296,188 657,934 7,500 2,136,603 1,690,678 3,827,281COSTA MESA 667,050 956,383 407,401 909,046 10,000 2,949,880 2,335,956 5,285,836CYPRESS 287,042 411,546 178,046 391,177 6,000 1,273,811 1,005,198 2,279,009 DANA POINT 197,258 282,819 123,856 268,821 6,000 878,754 690,783 1,569,537 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 327,155 469,058 202,256 445,842 7,500 1,451,811 1,145,670 2,597,482 FULLERTON 824,681 1,182,385 502,539 1,123,862 10,000 3,643,468 2,887,964 6,531,432 GARDEN GROVE 1,020,129 1,462,609 620,503 1,390,217 10,000 4,503,458 3,572,409 8,075,867 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,164,434 1,669,506 707,599 1,586,873 10,000 5,138,412 4,077,752 9,216,164 IRVINE 1,606,197 2,302,883 974,227 2,188,901 10,000 7,082,206 5,624,769 12,706,975 LAGUNA BEACH 134,398 192,693 85,916 183,155 5,000 601,162 470,650 1,071,812 LAGUNA HILLS 183,785 263,501 115,724 250,459 6,000 819,469 643,599 1,463,069 LAGUNA NIGUEL 385,444 552,629 237,436 525,277 7,500 1,708,286 1,349,792 3,058,078 LAGUNA WOODS 96,249 137,996 62,891 131,166 4,000 432,302 337,054 769,357 LA HABRA 371,485 532,616 229,011 506,254 7,500 1,646,867 1,300,911 2,947,778 LAKE FOREST 500,010 716,888 306,583 681,406 7,500 2,212,387 1,750,993 3,963,380 LA PALMA 92,079 132,018 60,374 125,484 4,000 413,955 322,452 736,407 LOS ALAMITOS 68,243 97,843 45,988 93,000 3,000 308,074 238,981 547,055 MISSION VIEJO 556,678 798,136 340,785 758,632 7,500 2,461,731 1,949,440 4,411,170 NEWPORT BEACH 507,859 728,141 311,320 692,102 7,500 2,246,922 1,778,479 4,025,401 ORANGE 812,467 1,164,874 495,168 1,107,218 10,000 3,589,727 2,845,193 6,434,920 PLACENTIA 302,669 433,951 187,477 412,472 7,500 1,344,069 1,059,921 2,403,989 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 284,984 408,595 176,803 388,372 6,000 1,264,754 997,990 2,262,745SAN CLEMENTE 378,920 543,276 233,499 516,386 7,500 1,679,581 1,326,946 3,006,527 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 211,749 303,595 132,602 288,569 6,000 942,515 741,528 1,684,043 SANTA ANA 1,959,920 2,810,033 1,187,718 2,670,950 10,000 8,638,621 6,863,480 15,502,101 SEAL BEACH 144,571 207,278 92,056 197,019 5,000 645,925 506,276 1,152,200 STANTON 234,059 335,582 146,067 318,972 6,000 1,040,681 819,656 1,860,336 TUSTIN 473,223 678,482 290,415 644,900 7,500 2,094,520 1,657,186 3,751,707 VILLA PARK 34,376 49,286 25,548 46,847 2,000 158,056 120,381 278,437 WESTMINSTER 540,986 775,638 331,314 737,248 7,500 2,392,687 1,894,489 4,287,176 YORBA LINDA 401,283 575,339 246,996 546,862 7,500 1,777,981 1,405,260 3,183,241 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 85,366 122,393 57,617 116,335 3,000 384,711 298,943 683,654 COLFAX 12,847 18,419 12,748 17,507 1,000 62,521 44,988 107,508 LINCOLN 293,507 420,815 186,397 399,987 6,000 1,306,706 1,027,837 2,334,543 LOOMIS 40,267 57,732 29,714 54,875 2,000 184,588 141,011 325,598 ROCKLIN 416,797 597,582 262,679 568,005 7,500 1,852,563 1,459,589 3,312,152 ROSEVILLE 868,709 1,245,511 542,284 1,183,864 10,000 3,850,367 3,042,148 6,892,516

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 12,444 17,842 8,822 130,509 1,000 170,617 43,579 214,196

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 190,646 273,338 118,764 259,809 6,000 848,558 667,626 1,516,183 BEAUMONT 311,617 446,781 191,079 424,668 7,500 1,381,645 1,091,259 2,472,904 BLYTHE 123,125 176,530 78,401 167,792 5,000 550,848 431,172 982,020 CALIMESA 60,542 86,802 40,991 82,506 2,000 272,841 212,013 484,854 CANYON LAKE 65,209 93,493 43,780 88,865 3,000 294,347 228,355 522,703 CATHEDRAL CITY 319,230 457,695 195,629 435,041 7,500 1,415,095 1,117,916 2,533,011 COACHELLA 282,867 405,559 173,892 385,486 6,000 1,253,804 990,575 2,244,379 CORONA 1,002,255 1,436,982 603,928 1,365,858 10,000 4,419,024 3,509,816 7,928,840 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 177,947 255,131 111,173 242,504 6,000 792,756 623,156 1,415,912 EASTVALE 399,982 573,473 243,901 545,089 7,500 1,769,946 1,400,703 3,170,649 HEMET 499,933 716,778 303,650 681,301 7,500 2,209,162 1,750,724 3,959,886 INDIAN WELLS 32,105 46,030 23,991 43,752 2,000 147,877 112,427 260,305 INDIO 541,903 776,953 328,739 738,497 7,500 2,393,592 1,897,700 4,291,292 JURUPA VALLEY 639,352 916,670 386,992 871,300 10,000 2,824,314 2,238,959 5,063,273 LAKE ELSINORE 383,042 549,186 233,775 522,004 7,500 1,695,508 1,341,383 3,036,891 LA QUINTA 243,960 349,778 150,635 332,465 6,000 1,082,837 854,328 1,937,166 MENIFEE 589,604 845,345 357,254 803,504 7,500 2,603,207 2,064,746 4,667,953 MORENO VALLEY 1,238,674 1,775,948 745,255 1,688,047 10,000 5,457,924 4,337,736 9,795,659 MURRIETA 681,198 976,667 412,007 928,326 10,000 3,008,198 2,385,500 5,393,698 NORCO 160,067 229,496 100,485 218,137 6,000 714,186 560,542 1,274,728 PALM DESERT 318,750 457,008 195,343 434,388 7,500 1,412,990 1,116,238 2,529,228 PALM SPRINGS 282,447 404,957 173,641 384,914 6,000 1,251,959 989,105 2,241,063 PERRIS 467,119 669,731 284,034 636,582 7,500 2,064,966 1,635,811 3,700,777 RANCHO MIRAGE 111,189 159,417 71,266 151,526 4,000 497,399 389,374 886,773 RIVERSIDE 1,918,122 2,750,105 1,151,415 2,613,987 10,000 8,443,629 6,717,105 15,160,733 SAN JACINTO 303,236 434,765 186,069 413,246 7,500 1,344,816 1,061,909 2,406,725 TEMECULA 666,997 956,306 403,518 908,974 10,000 2,945,795 2,335,769 5,281,564 WILDOMAR 218,918 313,873 135,665 298,338 6,000 972,793 766,632 1,739,425 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 519,368 744,644 338,535 707,787 7,500 2,317,835 1,818,785 4,136,620 ELK GROVE 1,053,535 1,510,505 681,780 1,435,742 10,000 4,691,561 3,689,393 8,380,954 FOLSOM 486,791 697,935 317,602 663,391 7,500 2,173,219 1,704,701 3,877,919 GALT 154,466 221,466 104,057 210,504 6,000 696,492 540,928 1,237,420 ISLETON 4,921 7,055 7,962 6,706 1,000 27,645 17,233 44,877 RANCHO CORDOVA 471,170 675,540 307,564 642,104 7,500 2,103,877 1,649,999 3,753,876 SACRAMENTO 3,050,008 4,372,945 1,964,672 4,156,504 20,000 13,564,128 10,680,876 24,245,004

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 244,782 350,956 144,788 333,586 6,000 1,080,112 857,207 1,937,320 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 12,722 18,241 12,076 17,338 1,000 61,377 44,553 105,929

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 207,881 298,049 129,903 283,297 6,000 925,131 727,982 1,653,113 APPLE VALLEY 439,752 630,493 269,444 599,287 7,500 1,946,476 1,539,974 3,486,450 BARSTOW 143,163 205,260 90,956 195,101 5,000 639,480 501,346 1,140,826 BIG BEAR LAKE 30,691 44,003 23,270 417,351 2,000 517,315 107,477 624,792 CHINO 521,574 747,807 318,685 710,794 7,500 2,306,360 1,826,511 4,132,871 CHINO HILLS 488,908 700,971 299,026 666,276 7,500 2,162,682 1,712,116 3,874,798 COLTON 320,560 459,603 197,714 436,855 7,500 1,422,232 1,122,576 2,544,808 FONTANA 1,265,397 1,814,261 766,319 1,724,463 10,000 5,580,440 4,431,315 10,011,755 GRAND TERRACE 73,335 105,144 48,933 99,940 3,000 330,353 256,814 587,168 HESPERIA 568,117 814,536 346,694 774,221 7,500 2,511,068 1,989,498 4,500,566 HIGHLAND 325,659 466,913 200,782 443,803 7,500 1,444,657 1,140,430 2,585,087 LOMA LINDA 147,244 211,111 93,412 200,662 5,000 657,430 515,638 1,173,068 MONTCLAIR 234,207 335,794 145,746 319,174 6,000 1,040,921 820,174 1,861,095 NEEDLES 31,661 45,394 23,854 43,147 2,000 146,055 110,874 256,929 ONTARIO 1,076,484 1,543,407 652,631 1,467,016 10,000 4,749,538 3,769,758 8,519,295 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,035,833 1,485,124 628,167 1,411,617 10,000 4,570,740 3,627,401 8,198,141 REDLANDS 420,849 603,391 258,068 573,526 7,500 1,863,334 1,473,777 3,337,111 RIALTO 606,644 869,776 369,880 826,726 10,000 2,683,026 2,124,419 4,807,445 SAN BERNARDINO 1,279,278 1,834,164 774,673 1,743,381 10,000 5,641,496 4,479,927 10,121,423 TWENTYNINE PALMS 177,243 254,122 111,466 241,544 6,000 790,376 620,691 1,411,067 UPLAND 464,374 665,796 284,262 632,842 7,500 2,054,774 1,626,200 3,680,975 VICTORVILLE 752,162 1,078,411 457,453 1,025,035 10,000 3,323,060 2,634,008 5,957,069 YUCAIPA 329,054 471,780 202,826 448,429 7,500 1,459,589 1,152,319 2,611,908 YUCCA VALLEY 132,073 189,360 84,282 179,988 5,000 590,703 462,510 1,053,213 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 683,144 979,457 427,740 930,978 10,000 3,031,319 2,392,314 5,423,633 CHULA VISTA 1,623,260 2,327,348 1,009,773 2,212,155 10,000 7,182,536 5,684,525 12,867,060 CORONADO 146,073 209,432 95,235 199,066 5,000 654,807 511,537 1,166,344 DEL MAR 25,184 36,108 20,392 34,321 1,000 117,005 88,194 205,199 EL CAJON 610,643 875,508 382,854 832,175 10,000 2,711,179 2,138,420 4,849,600 ENCINITAS 368,416 528,215 232,889 502,071 7,500 1,639,091 1,290,161 2,929,252 ESCONDIDO 897,176 1,286,325 560,249 1,222,658 10,000 3,976,408 3,141,837 7,118,246 IMPERIAL BEACH 164,273 235,526 106,502 223,868 6,000 736,169 575,269 1,311,438 LA MESA 352,381 505,226 222,962 480,219 7,500 1,568,288 1,234,009 2,802,297 LEMON GROVE 155,821 223,408 101,270 212,350 6,000 698,848 545,671 1,244,518 NATIONAL CITY 371,136 532,116 234,573 505,779 7,500 1,651,104 1,299,689 2,950,793 OCEANSIDE 1,045,432 1,498,887 652,035 1,424,699 10,000 4,631,053 3,661,017 8,292,070 POWAY 289,438 414,981 183,993 394,441 6,000 1,288,853 1,013,587 2,302,440 SAN DIEGO 8,345,724 11,965,672 5,171,702 11,373,426 20,000 36,876,524 29,226,040 66,102,563 SAN MARCOS 569,589 816,648 357,437 776,228 7,500 2,527,402 1,994,655 4,522,057 SANTEE 335,950 481,668 212,789 457,828 7,500 1,495,735 1,176,470 2,672,205 SOLANA BEACH 81,781 117,254 55,431 111,450 3,000 368,917 286,392 655,309 VISTA 610,791 875,720 382,945 832,376 10,000 2,711,832 2,138,938 4,850,770

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 5,175,348 7,420,149 1,941,168 7,052,886 20,000 21,609,551 18,123,643 39,733,194

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 44,366 63,609 29,891 60,461 2,000 200,326 155,364 355,691 LATHROP 168,584 241,708 100,142 229,744 6,000 746,178 590,368 1,336,547 LODI 406,636 583,014 234,772 554,157 7,500 1,786,078 1,424,005 3,210,083 MANTECA 516,458 740,472 296,882 703,822 7,500 2,265,133 1,808,595 4,073,728 RIPON 96,361 138,157 59,297 131,319 4,000 429,134 337,448 766,582 STOCKTON 1,897,858 2,721,052 1,078,130 2,586,372 10,000 8,293,412 6,646,144 14,939,556 TRACY 583,187 836,144 334,620 794,758 7,500 2,556,209 2,042,273 4,598,482

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 103,831 148,868 78,056 141,499 4,000 476,254 363,608 839,862 ATASCADERO 175,209 251,205 128,415 238,772 6,000 799,600 613,566 1,413,167 EL PASO DE ROBLES 183,785 263,501 134,466 250,459 6,000 838,211 643,599 1,481,811 GROVER BEACH 77,813 111,564 59,699 106,042 3,000 358,118 272,494 630,611 MORRO BAY 60,530 86,785 47,506 82,490 3,000 280,311 211,972 492,282 PISMO BEACH 47,956 68,756 38,634 65,353 2,000 222,700 167,937 390,637 SAN LUIS OBISPO 272,415 390,575 196,997 371,244 6,000 1,237,231 953,976 2,191,208 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 40,894 58,631 29,447 55,729 2,000 186,701 143,206 329,907 BELMONT 156,560 224,468 99,159 213,357 6,000 699,544 548,260 1,247,804 BRISBANE 27,083 38,830 21,123 36,908 1,000 124,945 94,843 219,787 BURLINGAME 175,936 252,248 110,838 239,763 6,000 784,785 616,114 1,400,899 COLMA 9,812 14,068 10,714 13,372 1,000 48,967 34,362 83,329 DALY CITY 642,321 920,927 391,930 875,346 10,000 2,840,525 2,249,357 5,089,882 EAST PALO ALTO 179,509 257,370 112,991 244,632 6,000 800,501 628,624 1,429,125 FOSTER CITY 194,248 278,503 121,874 264,718 6,000 865,342 680,240 1,545,582 HALF MOON BAY 72,803 104,381 48,679 99,215 3,000 328,078 254,950 583,028 HILLSBOROUGH 67,373 96,597 45,406 91,815 3,000 304,192 235,936 540,128 MENLO PARK 205,977 295,319 128,943 280,702 6,000 916,940 721,313 1,638,253 MILLBRAE 133,132 190,878 85,039 181,430 5,000 595,480 466,218 1,061,697 PACIFICA 224,105 321,310 139,869 305,407 6,000 996,690 784,797 1,781,487 PORTOLA VALLEY 26,971 38,669 21,055 36,755 1,000 124,450 94,449 218,899 REDWOOD CITY 503,819 722,350 308,454 686,597 7,500 2,228,719 1,764,332 3,993,051 SAN BRUNO 265,779 381,061 164,986 362,200 6,000 1,180,026 930,737 2,110,763 SAN CARLOS 176,338 252,825 111,080 240,311 6,000 786,555 617,522 1,404,077 SAN MATEO 609,472 873,829 372,132 830,579 10,000 2,696,011 2,134,319 4,830,330 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 397,078 569,310 244,121 541,132 7,500 1,759,140 1,390,534 3,149,673 WOODSIDE 33,287 47,726 24,863 45,364 2,000 153,239 116,570 269,809

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 32,146 46,089 20,833 43,808 2,000 144,876 112,572 257,449 CARPINTERIA 78,049 111,903 43,727 106,364 3,000 343,044 273,322 616,366 GOLETA 191,273 274,237 100,198 260,664 6,000 832,372 669,821 1,502,193GUADALUPE 49,363 70,775 29,420 67,272 2,000 218,830 172,867 391,696 LOMPOC 251,330 360,344 130,152 342,508 6,000 1,090,334 880,136 1,970,470 SANTA BARBARA 550,385 789,113 279,307 750,056 7,500 2,376,361 1,927,402 4,303,762 SANTA MARIA 635,496 911,141 321,757 866,044 10,000 2,744,438 2,225,454 4,969,893SOLVANG 32,601 46,742 21,060 44,429 2,000 146,832 114,167 261,000 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 245,652 352,203 145,583 334,770 6,000 1,084,208 860,252 1,944,460 CUPERTINO 346,928 497,407 203,624 472,788 7,500 1,528,246 1,214,912 2,743,159 GILROY 334,761 479,964 196,651 456,208 7,500 1,475,084 1,172,307 2,647,391 LOS ALTOS 180,455 258,727 108,218 245,921 6,000 799,322 631,938 1,431,260 LOS ALTOS HILLS 49,624 71,148 33,239 67,626 2,000 223,637 173,778 397,415 LOS GATOS 182,383 261,492 109,323 248,549 6,000 807,747 638,691 1,446,438 MILPITAS 447,518 641,628 261,272 609,870 7,500 1,967,787 1,567,170 3,534,957 MONTE SERENO 21,316 30,562 17,016 29,049 1,000 98,944 74,648 173,592 MORGAN HILL 280,199 401,735 165,382 381,851 6,000 1,235,167 981,234 2,216,401 MOUNTAIN VIEW 489,813 702,269 285,511 667,510 7,500 2,152,603 1,715,285 3,867,888 PALO ALTO 400,165 573,736 234,134 545,339 7,500 1,760,875 1,401,346 3,162,220 SAN JOSE 6,090,765 8,732,627 3,495,409 8,300,402 20,000 26,639,203 21,329,358 47,968,561 SANTA CLARA 773,312 1,108,736 447,984 1,053,858 10,000 3,393,891 2,708,076 6,101,967 SARATOGA 180,668 259,032 108,340 246,211 6,000 800,252 632,684 1,432,936 SUNNYVALE 909,828 1,304,464 526,221 1,239,899 10,000 3,990,412 3,186,142 7,176,554

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 59,684 85,572 38,515 81,337 3,000 268,109 209,010 477,119 SANTA CRUZ 354,558 508,346 205,087 483,186 7,500 1,558,677 1,241,631 2,800,308 SCOTTS VALLEY 69,526 99,683 44,075 94,749 3,000 311,034 243,475 554,509 WATSONVILLE 303,810 435,587 176,420 414,028 7,500 1,337,346 1,063,918 2,401,264

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 63,298 90,754 53,825 86,262 3,000 297,139 221,665 518,804 REDDING 542,459 777,750 424,938 739,255 7,500 2,491,902 1,899,647 4,391,549 SHASTA LAKE 63,032 90,372 53,619 85,899 3,000 295,922 220,733 516,655

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 4,548 6,521 6,179 22,453 1,000 40,702 15,928 56,630

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 5,861 8,404 8,955 7,988 1,000 32,208 20,526 52,734 DUNSMUIR 9,759 13,992 11,718 39,158 1,000 75,627 34,176 109,802 ETNA 4,395 6,301 7,915 5,989 1,000 25,599 15,389 40,989 FORT JONES 4,199 6,021 7,777 5,723 1,000 24,720 14,706 39,426 MONTAGUE 8,535 12,237 10,850 11,631 1,000 44,253 29,888 74,141 MOUNT SHASTA 20,157 28,900 19,088 95,906 1,000 165,051 70,588 235,639 TULELAKE 5,974 8,565 9,035 8,141 1,000 32,714 20,920 53,634 WEED 17,549 25,160 17,240 23,915 1,000 84,864 61,454 146,318 YREKA 45,927 65,848 37,356 63,255 2,000 214,385 160,833 375,218 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 160,351 229,903 107,905 218,524 6,000 722,683 561,537 1,284,220 DIXON 119,457 171,272 81,610 162,795 4,000 539,135 418,330 957,465 FAIRFIELD 697,954 1,000,691 453,579 951,161 10,000 3,113,386 2,444,178 5,557,564 RIO VISTA 59,619 85,479 43,135 81,248 2,000 271,482 208,782 480,264 SUISUN CITY 170,826 244,921 114,640 232,799 6,000 769,186 598,218 1,367,405 VACAVILLE 579,875 831,395 377,655 790,245 7,500 2,586,669 2,030,674 4,617,343 VALLEJO 697,014 999,343 452,975 949,880 10,000 3,109,211 2,440,885 5,550,096

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 54,018 77,449 38,289 73,615 2,000 245,370 189,167 434,538 COTATI 43,940 62,998 32,040 59,880 2,000 200,859 153,873 354,732 HEALDSBURG 69,792 100,065 48,068 95,112 3,000 316,037 244,407 560,445 PETALUMA 361,407 518,166 228,854 492,520 7,500 1,608,447 1,265,617 2,874,063 ROHNERT PARK 251,277 360,267 160,579 342,436 6,000 1,120,559 879,950 2,000,508SANTA ROSA 1,015,605 1,456,122 634,424 1,384,051 10,000 4,500,201 3,556,564 8,056,765 SEBASTOPOL 45,288 64,932 32,876 61,718 2,000 206,815 158,596 365,410 SONOMA 64,611 92,636 44,856 88,051 3,000 293,155 226,263 519,418WINDSOR 164,752 236,212 106,938 224,521 6,000 738,423 576,947 1,315,369

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 289,231 414,684 168,982 394,159 6,000 1,273,056 1,012,862 2,285,918 HUGHSON 43,194 61,930 29,319 58,865 2,000 195,309 151,263 346,572 MODESTO 1,297,040 1,859,629 741,067 1,767,586 10,000 5,675,322 4,542,127 10,217,449 NEWMAN 70,751 101,439 44,962 96,418 3,000 316,569 247,763 564,332 OAKDALE 137,438 197,051 82,817 187,298 5,000 609,605 481,296 1,090,901 PATTERSON 137,834 197,620 83,042 187,838 5,000 611,334 482,684 1,094,018 RIVERBANK 148,983 213,605 89,371 203,032 6,000 660,991 521,727 1,182,718 TURLOCK 442,532 634,479 256,004 603,075 7,500 1,943,590 1,549,709 3,493,299WATERFORD 52,900 75,846 34,829 72,092 2,000 237,667 185,253 422,919

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 55,402 79,433 35,714 75,501 2,000 248,050 194,014 442,064 YUBA CITY 418,613 600,186 238,379 570,479 7,500 1,835,157 1,465,948 3,301,105

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 45,330 64,991 30,986 61,775 2,000 205,081 158,741 363,822 RED BLUFF 84,413 121,028 53,564 115,037 3,000 377,042 295,609 672,651 TEHAMA 2,650 3,799 6,331 3,611 1,000 17,391 9,279 26,670

TRINITY COUNTY
20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 156,838 224,866 87,779 213,736 6,000 689,219 549,233 1,238,452 EXETER 65,043 93,255 39,212 88,640 3,000 289,151 227,775 516,926 FARMERSVILLE 66,995 96,054 40,245 91,300 3,000 297,593 234,610 532,204 LINDSAY 77,422 111,004 45,762 105,510 3,000 342,698 271,127 613,825 PORTERVILLE 352,340 505,166 191,213 480,163 7,500 1,536,382 1,233,864 2,770,247 TULARE 409,563 587,211 221,489 558,147 7,500 1,783,910 1,434,258 3,218,168 VISALIA 823,634 1,180,884 440,562 1,122,436 10,000 3,577,516 2,884,298 6,461,814 WOODLAKE 47,636 68,299 30,003 64,918 2,000 212,856 166,818 379,674

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 28,999 41,578 31,520 39,520 1,000 142,617 101,553 244,170

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 412,296 591,129 259,477 561,871 7,500 1,832,273 1,443,827 3,276,100 FILLMORE 93,492 134,045 62,551 127,410 4,000 421,497 327,402 748,900 MOORPARK 212,814 305,122 136,256 290,019 6,000 950,211 745,256 1,695,467 OJAI 44,129 63,270 32,059 60,138 2,000 201,596 154,536 356,132 OXNARD 1,210,574 1,735,659 752,577 1,649,752 10,000 5,358,562 4,239,331 9,597,892 PORT HUENEME 138,248 198,213 90,197 188,403 5,000 620,061 484,134 1,104,195 SAN BUENAVENTURA 629,510 902,560 393,651 857,887 10,000 2,793,608 2,204,493 4,998,102 SANTA PAULA 181,525 260,262 116,929 247,380 6,000 812,097 635,687 1,447,784SIMI VALLEY 736,180 1,055,498 459,542 1,003,255 10,000 3,264,476 2,578,043 5,842,519 THOUSAND OAKS 749,281 1,074,281 467,634 1,021,109 10,000 3,322,306 2,623,921 5,946,227

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 409,853 587,627 245,217 558,542 7,500 1,808,739 1,435,273 3,244,012 WEST SACRAMENTO 319,194 457,644 192,037 434,993 7,500 1,411,368 1,117,791 2,529,160 WINTERS 45,058 64,601 31,230 61,404 2,000 204,293 157,788 362,081 WOODLAND 360,661 517,098 216,362 491,504 7,500 1,593,125 1,263,007 2,856,132

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 72,164 103,465 43,155 98,344 3,000 320,129 252,713 572,842 WHEATLAND 21,352 30,613 16,148 29,098 1,000 98,211 74,772 172,983 Statewide Total $ 195,675,500 280,549,500 $ 113,803,593 $ 271,887,500 $ 2,709,500 $ 864,625,593 $ 685,239,500 $ 1,549,865,093 $ Notes:

3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 521,851 796,626 293,741 712,933 7,500 2,332,651 1,843,723 4,176,374 ALBANY 119,611 182,590 71,027 163,408 4,000 540,636 422,590 963,226 BERKELEY 753,324 1,149,978 421,904 1,029,162 10,000 3,364,368 2,661,527 6,025,896 DUBLIN 417,402 637,181 235,909 570,239 7,500 1,868,231 1,474,701 3,342,931 EMERYVILLE 81,203 123,959 49,761 110,936 3,000 368,860 286,894 655,753 FREMONT 1,511,275 2,307,018 841,569 2,064,644 10,000 6,734,506 5,339,399 12,073,905 HAYWARD 1,019,966 1,557,017 569,539 1,393,438 10,000 4,549,961 3,603,585 8,153,546 LIVERMORE 588,512 898,386 330,650 804,002 7,500 2,629,049 2,079,238 4,708,287 NEWARK 315,231 481,212 179,338 430,656 6,000 1,412,437 1,113,724 2,526,162 OAKLAND 2,809,871 4,289,374 1,560,581 3,838,734 10,000 12,508,560 9,927,394 22,435,955 PIEDMONT 72,880 111,254 45,153 99,566 3,000 331,853 257,488 589,341 PLEASANTON 505,638 771,875 284,764 690,783 7,500 2,260,560 1,786,440 4,047,000 SAN LEANDRO 563,175 859,709 316,621 769,388 7,500 2,516,394 1,989,723 4,506,117 UNION CITY 469,559 716,800 264,787 641,493 7,500 2,100,140 1,658,973 3,759,112

ALPINE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,194 1,822 5,678 1,631 1,000 11,325 4,217 15,542 IONE 51,086 77,984 42,394 69,791 2,000 243,255 180,488 423,743 JACKSON 30,008 45,808 26,882 40,995 1,000 144,693 106,018 250,711 PLYMOUTH 6,484 9,898 9,572 8,858 1,000 35,812 22,909 58,721 SUTTER CREEK 16,136 24,632 16,674 22,044 1,000 80,487 57,009 137,497

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 11,142 17,009 10,804 15,222 1,000 55,178 39,366 94,544 CHICO 719,317 1,098,064 392,409 982,702 10,000 3,202,492 2,541,377 5,743,869 GRIDLEY 42,479 64,846 27,690 58,033 2,000 195,048 150,080 345,128 OROVILLE 115,249 175,933 66,903 157,449 4,000 519,534 407,181 926,715 PARADISE 169,155 258,221 95,950 263,508 6,000 792,834 597,630 1,390,465

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 26,053 39,770 30,300 35,592 1,000 132,715 92,045 224,760

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 40,440 61,733 19,462 55,248 2,000 178,883 142,877 321,760 WILLIAMS 35,401 54,041 17,635 48,364 2,000 157,441 125,074 282,516 Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 728,078 1,111,439 437,692 994,672 10,000 3,281,882 2,572,332 5,854,213 BRENTWOOD 426,448 650,989 258,352 582,596 7,500 1,925,885 1,506,659 3,432,544 CLAYTON 72,699 110,978 48,025 99,319 3,000 334,022 256,850 590,872 CONCORD 834,050 1,273,209 500,700 1,139,446 10,000 3,757,404 2,946,734 6,704,139 DANVILLE 283,275 432,430 173,226 386,999 6,000 1,281,930 1,000,822 2,282,752 EL CERRITO 160,303 244,708 100,111 218,999 5,000 729,121 566,356 1,295,477 HERCULES 166,871 254,734 104,016 227,972 6,000 759,593 589,561 1,349,154 LAFAYETTE 163,606 249,751 102,075 223,512 6,000 744,944 578,027 1,322,971 MARTINEZ 237,602 362,709 146,071 324,603 6,000 1,076,985 839,459 1,916,444 MORAGA 108,520 165,660 69,323 148,256 4,000 495,759 383,406 879,165 OAKLEY 276,752 422,473 169,348 378,088 6,000 1,252,660 977,777 2,230,437 ORINDA 123,088 187,899 77,984 168,158 4,000 561,130 434,877 996,007 PINOLE 124,966 190,765 79,101 170,723 4,000 569,555 441,510 1,011,065 PITTSBURG 480,650 733,730 290,579 656,645 7,500 2,169,104 1,698,157 3,867,261 PLEASANT HILL 220,221 336,176 135,736 300,857 6,000 998,990 778,050 1,777,040 RICHMOND 710,542 1,084,670 427,266 970,715 10,000 3,203,192 2,510,376 5,713,568 SAN PABLO 200,272 305,723 123,875 273,604 6,000 909,473 707,569 1,617,042 SAN RAMON 541,071 825,966 326,504 739,190 7,500 2,440,232 1,911,629 4,351,861 WALNUT CREEK 460,127 702,401 278,377 628,607 7,500 2,077,011 1,625,647 3,702,657

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 49,311 75,276 26,559 67,367 2,000 220,513 174,220 394,733

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 70,248 107,236 65,844 95,970 3,000 342,298 248,188 590,486 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 150,960 230,447 135,982 1,251,424 5,000 1,773,814 533,349 2,307,163 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 786,055 1,199,942 389,065 1,073,877 10,000 3,458,939 2,777,165 6,236,103 COALINGA 116,695 178,139 61,846 159,424 4,000 520,103 412,287 932,390 FIREBAUGH 52,428 80,033 30,429 71,625 2,000 236,515 185,229 421,744 FOWLER 42,589 65,013 25,620 58,183 2,000 193,404 150,468 343,872 FRESNO 3,527,678 5,385,134 1,729,315 4,819,374 20,000 15,481,501 12,463,437 27,944,938 HURON 47,769 72,922 28,152 65,261 2,000 216,104 168,772 384,876 KERMAN 103,991 158,746 55,636 142,068 4,000 464,441 367,404 831,846 KINGSBURG 84,416 128,864 46,067 115,326 3,000 377,673 298,245 675,918 MENDOTA 80,313 122,600 44,061 109,720 3,000 359,694 283,748 643,442 ORANGE COVE 61,815 94,363 35,019 84,449 2,000 277,646 218,396 496,042 PARLIER 102,120 155,890 54,722 139,512 4,000 456,243 360,794 817,037 REEDLEY 168,309 256,931 87,079 229,938 6,000 748,256 594,644 1,342,901 SANGER 176,477 269,400 91,071 241,097 6,000 784,045 623,502 1,407,547 SAN JOAQUIN 26,743 40,824 17,873 36,535 1,000 122,975 94,484 217,459 SELMA 157,986 241,172 82,032 215,835 5,000 702,026 558,173 1,260,199

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 55,015 83,982 28,594 75,159 2,000 244,750 194,370 439,120 WILLOWS 40,214 61,389 22,193 54,939 2,000 180,735 142,079 322,814

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 111,172 169,708 79,194 151,879 4,000 515,953 392,775 908,728 BLUE LAKE 8,142 12,429 10,249 11,124 1,000 42,944 28,767 71,711 EUREKA 175,432 267,804 122,196 239,669 6,000 811,101 619,810 1,430,911 FERNDALE 8,845 13,503 10,719 12,084 1,000 46,152 31,251 77,404 FORTUNA 76,945 117,459 56,290 105,119 3,000 358,813 271,849 630,662 RIO DELL 21,730 33,171 19,341 29,686 1,000 104,929 76,772 181,701TRINIDAD 2,368 3,615 6,385 3,235 1,000 16,602 8,366 24,967

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 176,303 269,134 104,928 240,859 6,000 797,224 622,887 1,420,111 CALEXICO 261,203 398,736 153,146 356,845 6,000 1,175,931 922,842 2,098,773 CALIPATRIA 49,712 75,886 33,033 67,914 2,000 228,545 175,633 404,178 EL CENTRO 290,314 443,175 169,679 396,615 6,000 1,305,783 1,025,691 2,331,474 HOLTVILLE 40,234 61,418 27,650 54,966 2,000 186,268 142,148 328,415 IMPERIAL 130,902 199,826 79,143 178,833 4,000 592,704 462,481 1,055,184 WESTMORLAND 14,872 22,702 13,246 20,317 1,000 72,136 52,542 124,678

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 25,317 38,647 20,076 34,587 1,000 119,628 89,446 209,074 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 142,031 216,816 60,252 194,037 5,000 618,136 501,802 1,119,938 BAKERSFIELD 2,563,913 3,913,911 1,005,807 3,502,717 10,000 10,996,348 9,058,416 20,054,765 CALIFORNIA CITY 91,100 139,068 40,367 124,457 3,000 397,993 321,861 719,853 DELANO 342,213 522,400 138,407 467,517 7,500 1,478,037 1,209,052 2,687,089 MARICOPA 7,445 11,366 7,707 10,172 1,000 37,690 26,305 63,995 MCFARLAND 90,610 138,319 40,176 123,787 3,000 395,893 320,128 716,021 RIDGECREST 190,917 291,442 79,338 260,823 6,000 828,519 674,517 1,503,036 SHAFTER 131,927 201,392 56,307 180,234 5,000 574,861 466,105 1,040,966 TAFT 60,176 91,862 28,294 82,211 2,000 264,543 212,606 477,149 TEHACHAPI 92,997 141,963 41,108 127,049 3,000 406,117 328,562 734,679 WASCO 173,006 264,101 72,345 236,354 6,000 751,807 611,239 1,363,046

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 100,036 152,709 44,918 136,665 4,000 438,328 353,431 791,759 CORCORAN 160,090 244,383 69,002 218,708 5,000 697,183 565,604 1,262,787 HANFORD 386,988 590,752 159,997 528,688 7,500 1,673,926 1,367,247 3,041,173 LEMOORE 172,968 264,042 74,167 236,302 6,000 753,478 611,102 1,364,580

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 98,391 150,197 52,054 134,417 4,000 439,059 347,619 786,678 LAKEPORT 30,801 47,019 19,593 42,079 1,000 140,492 108,822 249,314

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 115,791 176,760 50,855 240,777 4,000 588,183 409,096 997,279

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 131,985 201,481 78,255 180,313 5,000 597,034 466,310 1,063,345 ALHAMBRA 556,524 849,554 314,525 760,301 7,500 2,488,404 1,966,222 4,454,626 ARCADIA 372,014 567,893 211,839 508,230 7,500 1,667,476 1,314,340 2,981,816ARTESIA 106,597 162,725 64,125 145,629 4,000 483,077 376,613 859,690AVALON 25,633 39,130 19,066 35,019 1,000 119,848 90,563 210,411 AZUSA 319,928 488,382 182,851 437,073 6,000 1,434,234 1,130,319 2,564,553 BALDWIN PARK 489,921 747,883 277,458 669,311 7,500 2,192,074 1,730,913 3,922,987BELL 234,325 357,706 135,210 320,125 6,000 1,053,365 827,879 1,881,245BELLFLOWER 499,747 762,883 282,927 682,735 7,500 2,235,793 1,765,629 4,001,422 BELL GARDENS 272,481 415,953 156,445 372,253 6,000 1,223,132 962,687 2,185,818 BEVERLY HILLS 220,066 335,939 127,275 300,646 6,000 989,926 777,503 1,767,429 BRADBURY 6,762 10,322 8,563 9,237 1,000 35,884 23,889 59,772 BURBANK 670,792 1,023,990 378,120 916,410 10,000 2,999,312 2,369,938 5,369,250 CALABASAS 157,044 239,734 92,201 214,548 5,000 708,528 554,845 1,263,372 CARSON 591,725 903,291 334,116 808,391 7,500 2,645,023 2,090,590 4,735,612 CERRITOS 322,902 492,922 184,506 441,136 6,000 1,447,467 1,140,827 2,588,294 CLAREMONT 230,376 351,678 133,012 314,731 6,000 1,035,798 813,929 1,849,727 COMMERCE 82,732 126,294 50,843 113,025 3,000 375,894 292,296 668,190 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL COMPTON 630,830 962,985 355,879 861,814 7,500 2,819,008 2,228,748 5,047,756 COVINA 315,063 480,956 180,144 430,427 6,000 1,412,590 1,113,132 2,525,721 CUDAHY 153,586 234,455 90,276 209,824 5,000 693,141 542,627 1,235,768 CULVER CITY 256,816 392,039 147,727 350,852 6,000 1,153,434 907,342 2,060,775 DIAMOND BAR 365,930 558,605 208,453 499,918 7,500 1,640,406 1,292,845 2,933,251 DOWNEY 721,136 1,100,842 406,138 985,188 10,000 3,223,303 2,547,805 5,771,108 DUARTE 138,437 211,330 81,845 189,128 5,000 625,740 489,105 1,114,845 EL MONTE 751,415 1,147,063 422,989 1,026,553 10,000 3,358,019 2,654,780 6,012,800 EL SEGUNDO 107,488 164,084 64,621 146,846 4,000 487,038 379,759 866,797 GARDENA 389,330 594,328 221,476 531,888 7,500 1,744,522 1,375,521 3,120,043 GLENDALE 1,315,106 2,007,560 736,703 1,796,646 10,000 5,866,015 4,646,327 10,512,342 GLENDORA 332,528 507,617 189,864 454,287 7,500 1,491,796 1,174,837 2,666,633 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 93,339 142,485 56,746 127,516 3,000 423,087 329,770 752,857 HAWTHORNE 561,304 856,853 317,186 766,832 7,500 2,509,675 1,983,113 4,492,788 HERMOSA BEACH 125,850 192,114 74,840 171,931 4,000 568,735 444,633 1,013,368 HIDDEN HILLS 12,342 18,841 11,669 16,862 1,000 60,714 43,606 104,320 HUNTINGTON PARK 380,253 580,470 216,424 519,486 7,500 1,704,133 1,343,449 3,047,582 INDUSTRY 2,910 4,442 6,419 3,975 1,000 18,746 10,280 29,027 INGLEWOOD 710,729 1,084,955 400,346 970,970 10,000 3,177,001 2,511,037 5,688,038 IRWINDALE 9,297 14,192 9,974 12,701 1,000 47,165 32,847 80,012 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 130,624 199,403 77,497 178,454 5,000 590,977 461,501 1,052,478 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 35,169 53,687 24,373 48,047 2,000 163,275 124,254 287,529 LAKEWOOD 517,554 790,067 292,837 707,062 7,500 2,315,021 1,828,542 4,143,563 LA MIRADA 313,760 478,966 179,418 428,646 6,000 1,406,791 1,108,527 2,515,318 LANCASTER 1,041,148 1,589,352 584,236 1,422,375 10,000 4,647,110 3,678,420 8,325,530 LA PUENTE 258,635 394,817 148,740 353,337 6,000 1,161,529 913,770 2,075,298 LA VERNE 213,453 325,844 123,594 291,611 6,000 960,502 754,139 1,714,641 LAWNDALE 211,421 322,742 122,463 288,835 6,000 951,460 746,958 1,698,418 LOMITA 131,818 201,225 78,161 180,084 5,000 596,288 465,718 1,062,006 LONG BEACH 3,017,724 4,606,670 1,684,270 4,122,695 10,000 13,441,358 10,661,747 24,103,105 LOS ANGELES 25,312,805 38,640,958 14,092,272 34,581,355 20,000 112,647,391 89,431,231 202,078,622 LYNWOOD 450,855 688,248 255,717 615,941 7,500 2,018,260 1,592,891 3,611,151 MALIBU 81,584 124,541 50,204 111,456 3,000 370,785 288,238 659,023 MANHATTAN BEACH 226,686 346,044 130,959 309,689 6,000 1,019,378 800,890 1,820,268 MAYWOOD 178,523 272,522 104,154 243,891 6,000 805,089 630,728 1,435,817 MONROVIA 248,261 378,979 142,966 339,164 6,000 1,115,370 877,116 1,992,486 MONTEBELLO 405,912 619,640 230,704 554,540 7,500 1,818,296 1,434,103 3,252,399 MONTEREY PARK 389,563 594,682 221,605 532,205 7,500 1,745,555 1,376,342 3,121,897 NORWALK 680,986 1,039,551 383,793 930,337 10,000 3,044,667 2,405,954 5,450,621 PALMDALE 1,006,966 1,537,172 565,212 1,375,677 10,000 4,495,027 3,557,654 8,052,681 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 86,700 132,351 53,052 118,446 3,000 393,548 306,315 699,863 PARAMOUNT 356,142 543,664 203,006 486,547 7,500 1,596,859 1,258,265 2,855,125 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL PASADENA 937,492 1,431,118 526,548 1,280,765 10,000 4,185,923 3,312,201 7,498,124 PICO RIVERA 407,479 622,033 231,577 556,682 7,500 1,825,271 1,439,642 3,264,914 POMONA 976,287 1,490,340 548,138 1,333,765 10,000 4,358,531 3,449,265 7,807,796 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 268,674 410,142 154,327 367,052 6,000 1,206,195 949,238 2,155,433 REDONDO BEACH 430,648 657,401 244,471 588,334 7,500 1,928,354 1,521,498 3,449,852 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 52,247 79,757 33,877 71,378 2,000 239,259 184,591 423,851 ROSEMEAD 349,877 534,101 199,519 477,989 7,500 1,568,986 1,236,132 2,805,118 SAN DIMAS 219,382 334,895 126,894 299,711 6,000 986,883 775,087 1,761,970 SAN FERNANDO 159,709 243,802 93,684 218,188 6,000 721,383 564,259 1,285,642 SAN GABRIEL 257,719 393,418 148,230 352,086 6,000 1,157,453 910,533 2,067,985 SAN MARINO 84,822 129,485 52,007 115,881 3,000 385,195 299,681 684,876 SANTA CLARITA 1,429,549 2,182,261 800,395 1,952,994 10,000 6,375,199 5,050,659 11,425,857 SANTA FE SPRINGS 116,966 178,552 69,895 159,794 4,000 529,207 413,244 942,452 SANTA MONICA 599,816 915,641 338,619 819,444 7,500 2,681,020 2,119,174 4,800,194 SIERRA MADRE 70,435 107,521 43,999 96,225 3,000 321,181 248,849 570,030 SIGNAL HILL 74,951 114,416 46,513 102,395 3,000 341,275 264,806 606,081 SOUTH EL MONTE 137,399 209,744 81,267 187,709 5,000 621,118 485,435 1,106,554 SOUTH GATE 622,945 950,950 351,491 851,043 7,500 2,783,930 2,200,893 4,984,823 SOUTH PASADENA 165,606 252,804 96,966 226,244 6,000 747,620 585,093 1,332,714 TEMPLE CITY 233,718 356,780 134,872 319,297 6,000 1,050,667 825,737 1,876,404 TORRANCE 938,344 1,432,418 527,022 1,281,929 10,000 4,189,712 3,315,210 7,504,922 VERNON 1,903 2,905 5,859 2,600 1,000 14,268 6,724 20,993 WALNUT 192,491 293,845 111,928 262,974 6,000 867,237 680,079 1,547,316 WEST COVINA 684,528 1,044,958 385,764 935,176 10,000 3,060,427 2,418,468 5,478,895 WEST HOLLYWOOD 233,073 355,795 134,513 318,415 6,000 1,047,797 823,457 1,871,254 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 53,357 81,451 34,495 72,894 2,000 244,197 188,512 432,709 WHITTIER 556,124 848,944 314,302 759,754 7,500 2,486,624 1,964,809 4,451,433 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 120,779 184,373 46,298 165,003 4,000 520,453 426,716 947,169 MADERA 426,932 651,728 151,488 583,257 7,500 1,820,905 1,508,368 3,329,273

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 13,342 20,368 13,119 18,228 1,000 66,057 47,139 113,197 CORTE MADERA 64,706 98,776 45,146 88,398 3,000 300,025 228,608 528,633 FAIRFAX 48,376 73,848 34,964 66,089 2,000 225,277 170,914 396,191 LARKSPUR 78,674 120,099 53,855 107,481 3,000 363,109 277,958 641,067 MILL VALLEY 93,874 143,303 63,333 128,248 3,000 431,758 331,662 763,421 NOVATO 345,084 526,783 219,970 471,440 7,500 1,570,776 1,219,195 2,789,971 ROSS 16,433 25,085 15,046 22,450 1,000 80,015 58,058 138,073 SAN ANSELMO 81,868 124,974 55,847 111,844 3,000 377,532 289,241 666,774 SAN RAFAEL 380,762 581,248 242,216 520,182 7,500 1,731,909 1,345,250 3,077,159 SAUSALITO 47,453 72,439 34,389 64,829 2,000 221,110 167,655 388,765 TIBURON 61,009 93,132 42,841 83,348 2,000 282,329 215,546 497,875

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 47,802 72,971 35,389 65,305 2,000 223,467 168,886 392,353 POINT ARENA 2,897 4,422 6,654 3,958 1,000 18,930 10,235 29,165 UKIAH 103,713 158,323 71,169 141,689 4,000 478,894 366,424 845,318 WILLITS 32,517 49,639 25,609 44,424 2,000 154,189 114,885 269,074

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 205,233 313,296 92,745 280,382 6,000 897,656 725,098 1,622,755 DOS PALOS 35,969 54,908 20,213 49,140 2,000 162,230 127,080 289,310 GUSTINE 37,711 57,567 20,960 51,519 2,000 169,757 133,235 302,992 LIVINGSTON 99,668 152,147 47,509 136,163 4,000 439,487 352,132 791,619 LOS BANOS 276,584 422,216 123,320 377,859 6,000 1,205,979 977,184 2,183,164 MERCED 586,931 895,973 256,307 801,842 7,500 2,548,553 2,073,653 4,622,207

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 18,620 28,424 13,183 26,919 1,000 88,146 65,785 153,931

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 53,125 81,097 64,544 1,924,595 2,000 2,125,360 187,691 2,313,051 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 25,956 39,622 15,731 35,460 1,000 117,769 91,703 209,472 DEL REY OAKS 10,775 16,448 9,337 14,720 1,000 52,280 38,067 90,347 GONZALES 54,776 83,618 27,868 74,833 2,000 243,095 193,527 436,621 GREENFIELD 118,727 181,241 54,799 162,200 4,000 520,967 419,467 940,434 KING CITY 96,629 147,508 45,493 132,011 3,000 424,642 341,396 766,037 MARINA 141,425 215,890 64,357 193,209 6,000 620,880 499,659 1,120,539 MONTEREY 183,116 279,534 81,915 250,166 6,000 800,732 646,958 1,447,690 PACIFIC GROVE 100,236 153,014 47,012 136,938 4,000 441,200 354,138 795,338 SALINAS 1,033,625 1,577,868 440,084 1,412,098 10,000 4,473,674 3,651,842 8,125,516 SAND CITY 2,484 3,792 5,846 3,393 1,000 16,515 8,776 25,291 SEASIDE 213,072 325,263 94,530 291,091 6,000 929,956 752,794 1,682,750 SOLEDAD 166,058 253,493 74,731 226,861 6,000 727,143 586,689 1,313,832

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 134,211 204,879 64,718 183,354 5,000 592,162 474,175 1,066,337 CALISTOGA 34,453 52,594 20,181 47,068 2,000 156,296 121,723 278,019 NAPA 512,257 781,981 233,495 699,826 7,500 2,235,058 1,809,828 4,044,886SAINT HELENA 39,163 59,783 22,284 53,503 2,000 176,733 138,364 315,096YOUNTVILLE 18,923 28,887 13,248 25,852 1,000 87,911 66,857 154,768

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 82,971 126,658 114,131 113,351 3,000 440,111 293,139 733,250 NEVADA CITY 19,878 30,345 30,993 27,157 1,000 109,373 70,230 179,603 TRUCKEE 104,604 159,682 142,637 1,752,829 4,000 2,163,751 369,570 2,533,321 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 321,386 490,608 199,099 439,065 7,500 1,457,657 1,135,470 2,593,128 ANAHEIM 2,280,522 3,481,304 1,383,524 3,115,560 10,000 10,270,910 8,057,183 18,328,093 BREA 291,217 444,554 180,860 397,849 6,000 1,320,480 1,028,883 2,349,363 BUENA PARK 526,639 803,934 323,187 719,473 7,500 2,380,733 1,860,637 4,241,370COSTA MESA 727,640 1,110,769 444,705 994,072 10,000 3,287,187 2,570,782 5,857,969 CYPRESS 313,115 477,981 194,098 427,765 6,000 1,418,959 1,106,248 2,525,207 DANA POINT 215,176 328,474 134,888 293,964 6,000 978,501 760,225 1,738,726 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 356,871 544,777 220,552 487,543 7,500 1,617,244 1,260,841 2,878,085 FULLERTON 899,588 1,373,255 548,659 1,228,981 10,000 4,060,483 3,178,282 7,238,766 GARDEN GROVE 1,112,789 1,698,715 677,553 1,520,249 10,000 5,019,306 3,931,532 8,950,838 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,270,201 1,939,011 772,719 1,735,299 10,000 5,727,230 4,487,676 10,214,907 IRVINE 1,752,090 2,674,632 1,064,052 2,393,636 10,000 7,894,410 6,190,210 14,084,620 LAGUNA BEACH 146,605 223,799 93,432 200,286 5,000 669,123 517,963 1,187,086 LAGUNA HILLS 200,478 306,038 126,002 273,886 6,000 912,404 708,299 1,620,702 LAGUNA NIGUEL 420,454 641,839 258,992 574,408 7,500 1,903,193 1,485,483 3,388,675 LAGUNA WOODS 104,991 160,273 68,274 143,434 4,000 480,972 370,938 851,909 LA HABRA 405,228 618,596 249,787 553,606 7,500 1,834,716 1,431,687 3,266,403 LAKE FOREST 545,426 832,614 334,546 745,140 7,500 2,465,226 1,927,015 4,392,242 LA PALMA 100,442 153,329 65,524 137,220 4,000 460,516 354,867 815,383 LOS ALAMITOS 74,441 113,638 49,805 101,699 3,000 342,583 263,005 605,588 MISSION VIEJO 607,242 926,977 371,917 829,590 7,500 2,743,226 2,145,411 4,888,636 NEWPORT BEACH 553,988 845,684 339,722 756,837 7,500 2,503,730 1,957,264 4,460,994 ORANGE 886,265 1,352,917 540,605 1,210,780 10,000 4,000,566 3,131,211 7,131,778 PLACENTIA 330,160 504,003 204,403 451,052 7,500 1,497,119 1,166,471 2,663,590 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 310,869 474,554 192,741 424,698 6,000 1,408,862 1,098,315 2,507,177SAN CLEMENTE 413,338 630,976 254,690 564,686 7,500 1,871,189 1,460,340 3,331,529 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 230,983 352,604 144,444 315,559 6,000 1,049,590 816,072 1,865,662 SANTA ANA 2,137,943 3,263,651 1,297,325 2,920,773 10,000 9,629,692 7,553,444 17,183,137 SEAL BEACH 157,703 240,739 100,141 215,447 5,000 719,030 557,170 1,276,200 STANTON 255,319 389,754 159,157 348,807 6,000 1,159,037 902,053 2,061,090 TUSTIN 516,206 788,008 316,880 705,220 7,500 2,333,814 1,823,778 4,157,593 VILLA PARK 37,498 57,242 27,470 51,228 2,000 175,439 132,483 307,922 WESTMINSTER 590,125 900,848 361,569 806,205 7,500 2,666,247 2,084,937 4,751,183 YORBA LINDA 437,732 668,215 269,438 598,012 7,500 1,980,897 1,546,527 3,527,424 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 93,120 142,151 62,511 127,216 3,000 427,997 328,995 756,993 COLFAX 14,013 21,392 13,485 19,145 1,000 69,035 49,510 118,545 LINCOLN 320,167 488,746 203,224 437,399 6,000 1,455,536 1,131,162 2,586,698 LOOMIS 43,924 67,052 32,022 60,007 2,000 205,006 155,186 360,192 ROCKLIN 454,655 694,049 286,573 621,132 7,500 2,063,910 1,606,317 3,670,227 ROSEVILLE 947,615 1,446,571 592,086 1,294,595 10,000 4,290,867 3,347,966 7,638,833

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 13,575 20,722 9,195 132,095 1,000 176,587 47,960 224,547

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 207,962 317,463 129,324 284,110 6,000 944,859 734,740 1,679,600 BEAUMONT 339,922 518,904 208,339 464,388 7,500 1,539,053 1,200,960 2,740,013 BLYTHE 134,308 205,026 85,221 183,486 5,000 613,042 474,516 1,087,559 CALIMESA 66,041 100,814 44,344 90,223 2,000 303,422 233,326 536,749 CANYON LAKE 71,132 108,585 47,392 97,177 3,000 327,286 251,311 578,597 CATHEDRAL CITY 348,226 531,580 213,311 475,732 7,500 1,576,349 1,230,296 2,806,645 COACHELLA 308,560 471,028 189,560 421,542 6,000 1,396,690 1,090,155 2,486,844 CORONA 1,093,292 1,668,951 659,443 1,493,612 10,000 4,925,298 3,862,647 8,787,944 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 194,110 296,317 121,030 265,186 6,000 882,643 685,800 1,568,443 EASTVALE 436,313 666,048 266,056 596,073 7,500 1,971,990 1,541,512 3,513,502 HEMET 545,343 832,486 331,341 745,025 7,500 2,461,695 1,926,719 4,388,414 INDIAN WELLS 35,021 53,460 25,770 47,844 2,000 164,094 123,729 287,824 INDIO 591,125 902,375 358,755 807,571 7,500 2,667,326 2,088,470 4,755,795 JURUPA VALLEY 697,426 1,064,647 422,405 952,795 10,000 3,147,273 2,464,035 5,611,307 LAKE ELSINORE 417,835 637,840 254,992 570,829 7,500 1,888,996 1,476,228 3,365,224 LA QUINTA 266,119 406,241 164,147 363,562 6,000 1,206,070 940,211 2,146,281 MENIFEE 643,159 981,807 389,912 878,659 7,500 2,901,036 2,272,309 5,173,345 MORENO VALLEY 1,351,185 2,062,635 813,864 1,845,936 10,000 6,083,620 4,773,795 10,857,415 MURRIETA 743,072 1,134,328 449,738 1,015,156 10,000 3,352,295 2,625,307 5,977,601 NORCO 174,606 266,543 109,351 238,540 6,000 795,041 616,892 1,411,933 PALM DESERT 347,703 530,782 212,998 475,018 7,500 1,574,001 1,228,450 2,802,451 PALM SPRINGS 308,102 470,329 189,286 420,916 6,000 1,394,632 1,088,536 2,483,168 PERRIS 509,548 777,844 309,908 696,124 7,500 2,300,923 1,800,254 4,101,177 RANCHO MIRAGE 121,288 185,151 77,425 165,699 4,000 553,564 428,517 982,081 RIVERSIDE 2,092,348 3,194,048 1,257,659 2,858,483 10,000 9,412,537 7,392,354 16,804,892 SAN JACINTO 330,780 504,948 202,865 451,898 7,500 1,497,991 1,168,660 2,666,651 TEMECULA 727,582 1,110,681 440,462 993,993 10,000 3,282,718 2,570,577 5,853,294 WILDOMAR 238,802 364,541 147,790 326,242 6,000 1,083,376 843,699 1,927,075 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 566,543 864,850 369,459 773,989 7,500 2,582,341 2,001,622 4,583,963 ELK GROVE 1,149,229 1,754,342 744,508 1,570,032 10,000 5,228,111 4,060,276 9,288,387 FOLSOM 531,007 810,602 346,585 725,440 7,500 2,421,134 1,876,069 4,297,203 GALT 168,497 257,216 113,254 230,193 6,000 775,160 595,305 1,370,465 ISLETON 5,368 8,194 8,255 7,333 1,000 30,151 18,965 49,116 RANCHO CORDOVA 513,967 784,590 335,618 702,162 7,500 2,343,837 1,815,868 4,159,706 SACRAMENTO 3,327,045 5,078,860 2,146,270 4,545,277 20,000 15,117,452 11,754,592 26,872,043

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 267,016 407,610 157,759 364,787 6,000 1,203,173 943,380 2,146,553 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 13,878 21,185 12,750 18,959 1,000 67,772 49,031 116,804

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 226,763 346,163 141,495 309,795 6,000 1,030,216 801,164 1,831,380 APPLE VALLEY 479,695 732,273 293,965 655,340 7,500 2,168,773 1,694,783 3,863,557 BARSTOW 156,167 238,395 98,939 213,349 5,000 711,850 551,745 1,263,595 BIG BEAR LAKE 33,479 51,106 24,981 421,263 2,000 532,830 118,281 651,111 CHINO 568,950 868,524 347,769 777,277 7,500 2,570,020 2,010,124 4,580,144 CHINO HILLS 533,316 814,128 326,289 728,596 7,500 2,409,829 1,884,230 4,294,058 COLTON 349,677 533,796 215,589 477,715 7,500 1,584,278 1,235,425 2,819,703 FONTANA 1,380,334 2,107,133 836,881 1,885,758 10,000 6,220,107 4,876,781 11,096,888 GRAND TERRACE 79,996 122,118 53,023 109,288 3,000 367,425 282,631 650,056 HESPERIA 619,719 946,025 378,374 846,636 7,500 2,798,255 2,189,496 4,987,750 HIGHLAND 355,239 542,286 218,942 485,313 7,500 1,609,280 1,255,074 2,864,354 LOMA LINDA 160,619 245,191 101,623 219,431 5,000 731,863 567,473 1,299,336 MONTCLAIR 255,480 390,000 158,806 349,027 6,000 1,159,314 902,623 2,061,937 NEEDLES 34,537 52,722 25,619 47,183 2,000 162,060 122,020 284,080 ONTARIO 1,174,262 1,792,556 712,658 1,604,231 10,000 5,293,708 4,148,720 9,442,427 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,129,919 1,724,864 685,927 1,543,651 10,000 5,094,361 3,992,052 9,086,413 REDLANDS 459,075 700,795 281,535 627,170 7,500 2,076,076 1,621,931 3,698,007 RIALTO 661,747 1,010,182 403,708 904,052 10,000 2,989,689 2,337,980 5,327,669 SAN BERNARDINO 1,395,477 2,130,249 846,009 1,906,446 10,000 6,288,180 4,930,280 11,218,460 TWENTYNINE PALMS 193,343 295,145 121,349 264,137 6,000 879,973 683,088 1,563,061 UPLAND 506,554 773,274 310,156 692,034 7,500 2,289,519 1,789,677 4,079,196 VICTORVILLE 820,482 1,252,496 499,395 1,120,910 10,000 3,703,283 2,898,797 6,602,080 YUCAIPA 358,942 547,939 221,174 490,373 7,500 1,625,928 1,268,158 2,894,086 YUCCA VALLEY 144,070 219,928 91,647 196,822 5,000 657,467 509,005 1,166,472 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 745,195 1,137,569 466,929 1,018,056 10,000 3,377,748 2,632,806 6,010,555 CHULA VISTA 1,770,704 2,703,046 1,102,892 2,419,065 10,000 8,005,708 6,255,972 14,261,680 CORONADO 159,341 243,241 103,615 217,686 5,000 728,882 562,960 1,291,842 DEL MAR 27,472 41,937 21,837 37,531 1,000 129,777 97,060 226,836 EL CAJON 666,108 1,016,840 417,883 910,011 10,000 3,020,842 2,353,389 5,374,231 ENCINITAS 401,879 613,484 254,023 549,032 7,500 1,825,918 1,419,857 3,245,775 ESCONDIDO 978,668 1,493,974 611,716 1,337,018 10,000 4,431,376 3,457,677 7,889,052 IMPERIAL BEACH 179,194 273,546 115,926 244,807 6,000 819,473 633,099 1,452,572 LA MESA 384,388 586,783 243,176 525,136 7,500 1,746,984 1,358,060 3,105,044 LEMON GROVE 169,974 259,472 110,208 232,212 6,000 777,866 600,525 1,378,391 NATIONAL CITY 404,847 618,014 255,864 553,086 7,500 1,839,311 1,430,342 3,269,654 OCEANSIDE 1,140,390 1,740,849 712,007 1,557,956 10,000 5,161,202 4,029,048 9,190,250 POWAY 315,728 481,970 200,597 431,335 6,000 1,435,630 1,115,480 2,551,109 SAN DIEGO 9,103,779 13,897,264 5,650,459 12,437,223 20,000 41,108,726 32,164,043 73,272,768 SAN MARCOS 621,326 948,478 390,112 848,831 7,500 2,816,247 2,195,172 5,011,418 SANTEE 366,465 559,423 232,061 500,650 7,500 1,666,099 1,294,737 2,960,836 SOLANA BEACH 89,210 136,182 60,123 121,875 3,000 410,389 315,182 725,571 VISTA 666,270 1,017,086 417,983 910,231 10,000 3,021,570 2,353,959 5,375,529

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 5,645,433 8,617,967 2,120,589 7,712,567 20,000 24,116,557 19,945,557 44,062,114

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 48,395 73,877 32,216 66,116 2,000 222,604 170,983 393,587 LATHROP 183,897 280,726 108,977 251,233 6,000 830,833 649,716 1,480,549 LODI 443,571 677,128 256,081 605,989 7,500 1,990,269 1,567,156 3,557,425 MANTECA 563,369 860,004 323,946 769,653 7,500 2,524,472 1,990,407 4,514,879 RIPON 105,114 160,460 64,346 143,602 4,000 477,522 371,371 848,892 STOCKTON 2,070,244 3,160,305 1,177,583 2,828,285 10,000 9,246,417 7,314,260 16,560,677 TRACY 636,159 971,121 365,181 869,095 7,500 2,849,055 2,247,576 5,096,632

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 113,262 172,899 84,844 154,734 4,000 529,739 400,160 929,900 ATASCADERO 191,123 291,757 139,869 261,105 6,000 889,854 675,246 1,565,100 EL PASO DE ROBLES 200,478 306,038 146,480 273,886 6,000 932,882 708,299 1,641,180 GROVER BEACH 84,881 129,573 64,786 115,960 3,000 398,200 299,887 698,087 MORRO BAY 66,028 100,795 51,463 90,205 3,000 311,491 233,281 544,771 PISMO BEACH 52,312 79,856 41,769 71,466 2,000 247,402 184,819 432,222 SAN LUIS OBISPO 297,159 453,625 214,806 405,967 6,000 1,377,557 1,049,877 2,427,434 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 44,608 68,096 31,731 60,942 2,000 207,376 157,602 364,979 BELMONT 170,780 260,703 107,903 233,314 6,000 778,699 603,375 1,382,074 BRISBANE 29,543 45,099 22,636 40,361 1,000 138,638 104,377 243,014 BURLINGAME 191,917 292,968 120,663 262,189 6,000 873,737 678,050 1,551,787 COLMA 10,704 16,339 11,262 14,623 1,000 53,928 37,816 91,744 DALY CITY 700,664 1,069,591 427,801 957,220 10,000 3,165,276 2,475,477 5,640,754 EAST PALO ALTO 195,814 298,917 123,016 267,513 6,000 891,259 691,818 1,583,077 FOSTER CITY 211,892 323,461 132,722 289,478 6,000 963,552 748,622 1,712,175 HALF MOON BAY 79,416 121,231 52,744 108,495 3,000 364,886 280,579 645,466 HILLSBOROUGH 73,493 112,190 49,169 100,403 3,000 338,255 259,654 597,909 MENLO PARK 224,686 342,991 140,446 306,957 6,000 1,021,079 793,824 1,814,904 MILLBRAE 145,225 221,691 92,474 198,400 5,000 662,790 513,085 1,175,875 PACIFICA 244,461 373,178 152,384 333,972 6,000 1,109,996 863,690 1,973,685 PORTOLA VALLEY 29,420 44,911 22,562 40,193 1,000 138,086 103,944 242,030 REDWOOD CITY 549,581 838,957 336,590 750,816 7,500 2,483,445 1,941,695 4,425,140 SAN BRUNO 289,920 442,574 179,829 396,078 6,000 1,314,401 1,024,301 2,338,702 SAN CARLOS 192,355 293,638 120,928 262,788 6,000 875,709 679,600 1,555,310 SAN MATEO 664,831 1,014,889 406,168 908,266 10,000 3,004,154 2,348,876 5,353,030 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 433,145 661,212 266,296 591,745 7,500 1,959,898 1,530,320 3,490,218 WOODSIDE 36,311 55,430 26,721 49,607 2,000 170,069 128,288 298,358

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 35,066 53,529 22,319 47,906 2,000 160,819 123,889 284,708 CARPINTERIA 85,139 129,967 47,334 116,313 3,000 381,753 300,798 682,552 GOLETA 208,646 318,507 109,038 285,044 6,000 927,235 737,157 1,664,392GUADALUPE 53,847 82,200 31,702 73,564 2,000 243,312 190,244 433,556 LOMPOC 274,158 418,513 141,767 374,544 6,000 1,214,983 968,614 2,183,597 SANTA BARBARA 600,377 916,498 304,742 820,211 7,500 2,649,328 2,121,157 4,770,486 SANTA MARIA 693,219 1,058,225 351,125 947,048 10,000 3,059,618 2,449,172 5,508,790 SOLVANG 35,563 54,288 22,567 48,584 2,000 163,001 125,644 288,645 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 267,965 409,058 158,627 366,083 6,000 1,207,733 946,731 2,154,464 CUPERTINO 378,440 577,703 222,047 517,009 7,500 1,702,698 1,337,044 3,039,742 GILROY 365,168 557,443 214,428 498,878 7,500 1,643,418 1,290,155 2,933,573 LOS ALTOS 196,846 300,493 117,801 268,923 6,000 890,063 695,465 1,585,528 LOS ALTOS HILLS 54,131 82,633 35,874 73,952 2,000 248,590 191,247 439,837 LOS GATOS 198,949 303,704 119,008 271,797 6,000 899,458 702,896 1,602,354 MILPITAS 488,166 745,204 285,036 666,914 7,500 2,192,820 1,724,712 3,917,533 MONTE SERENO 23,252 35,496 18,148 31,767 1,000 109,663 82,152 191,815 MORGAN HILL 305,650 466,586 180,261 417,567 6,000 1,376,064 1,079,874 2,455,938 MOUNTAIN VIEW 534,303 815,635 311,521 729,944 7,500 2,398,904 1,887,717 4,286,621 PALO ALTO 436,513 666,353 255,384 596,347 7,500 1,962,096 1,542,218 3,504,315 SAN JOSE 6,643,998 10,142,316 3,818,844 9,076,768 20,000 29,701,926 23,473,532 53,175,459 SANTA CLARA 843,554 1,287,716 489,049 1,152,429 10,000 3,782,749 2,980,311 6,763,059 SARATOGA 197,078 300,847 117,934 269,240 6,000 891,100 696,286 1,587,386 SUNNYVALE 992,469 1,515,041 574,535 1,355,871 10,000 4,447,916 3,506,434 7,954,351

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 65,106 99,386 41,639 88,945 3,000 298,076 230,021 528,097 SANTA CRUZ 386,763 590,408 223,646 528,380 7,500 1,736,696 1,366,449 3,103,144 SCOTTS VALLEY 75,841 115,775 47,714 103,612 3,000 345,942 267,951 613,893 WATSONVILLE 331,406 505,903 192,322 452,753 7,500 1,489,885 1,170,871 2,660,756

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 69,048 105,404 58,367 94,330 3,000 330,149 243,948 574,098 REDDING 591,731 903,300 463,868 808,400 7,500 2,774,799 2,090,612 4,865,412 SHASTA LAKE 68,757 104,961 58,142 93,934 3,000 328,794 242,923 571,717

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 4,961 7,574 6,307 23,033 1,000 42,875 17,529 60,404

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 6,394 9,760 9,340 8,735 1,000 35,229 22,590 57,818 DUNSMUIR 10,646 16,251 12,359 40,402 1,000 80,657 37,611 118,268 ETNA 4,794 7,318 8,204 6,549 1,000 27,864 16,936 44,801 FORT JONES 4,581 6,993 8,053 6,258 1,000 26,884 16,184 43,069 MONTAGUE 9,310 14,212 11,411 12,719 1,000 48,652 32,893 81,544 MOUNT SHASTA 21,988 33,565 20,412 98,475 1,000 175,441 77,684 253,125 TULELAKE 6,516 9,947 9,427 8,902 1,000 35,793 23,023 58,816 WEED 19,143 29,222 18,392 26,152 1,000 93,909 67,632 161,540 YREKA 50,099 76,477 40,372 69,109 2,000 238,057 177,001 415,058 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 174,916 267,016 117,458 238,963 6,000 804,354 617,986 1,422,340 DIXON 130,308 198,920 88,727 178,022 4,000 599,977 460,384 1,060,361 FAIRFIELD 761,350 1,162,230 495,162 1,040,127 10,000 3,468,870 2,689,884 6,158,754 RIO VISTA 65,035 99,278 46,687 88,848 2,000 301,847 229,770 531,617 SUISUN CITY 186,342 284,459 124,817 254,574 6,000 856,192 658,355 1,514,547 VACAVILLE 632,546 965,605 412,203 864,159 7,500 2,882,013 2,234,811 5,116,825 VALLEJO 760,325 1,160,664 494,502 1,038,726 10,000 3,464,216 2,686,260 6,150,476

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 58,925 89,951 41,392 80,501 2,000 272,768 208,184 480,951 COTATI 47,931 73,168 34,564 65,481 2,000 223,145 169,342 392,486 HEALDSBURG 76,132 116,218 52,077 104,008 3,000 351,435 268,977 620,412 PETALUMA 394,234 601,813 249,614 538,587 7,500 1,791,748 1,392,845 3,184,593 ROHNERT PARK 274,100 418,425 175,013 374,465 6,000 1,248,003 968,408 2,216,412SANTA ROSA 1,107,854 1,691,180 692,764 1,513,506 10,000 5,015,303 3,914,094 8,929,398 SEBASTOPOL 49,402 75,414 35,478 67,491 2,000 229,784 174,539 404,323 SONOMA 70,480 107,590 48,567 96,287 3,000 325,925 249,009 574,934WINDSOR 179,716 274,344 116,402 245,521 6,000 821,983 634,945 1,456,928

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 315,502 481,626 184,195 431,026 6,000 1,418,349 1,114,682 2,533,031 HUGHSON 47,118 71,927 31,591 64,371 2,000 217,007 166,469 383,476 MODESTO 1,414,852 2,159,825 809,289 1,932,915 10,000 6,326,880 4,998,733 11,325,613 NEWMAN 77,177 117,814 48,683 105,436 3,000 352,110 272,670 624,780 OAKDALE 149,922 228,861 90,046 204,817 5,000 678,646 529,680 1,208,325 PATTERSON 150,354 229,521 90,292 205,408 5,000 680,574 531,207 1,211,781 RIVERBANK 162,516 248,086 97,207 222,022 6,000 735,831 574,175 1,310,006 TURLOCK 482,727 736,902 279,280 659,483 7,500 2,165,892 1,705,497 3,871,389WATERFORD 57,705 88,089 37,611 78,835 2,000 264,241 203,875 468,116

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 60,434 92,256 38,578 82,563 2,000 275,831 213,518 489,349 YUBA CITY 456,636 697,072 260,022 623,838 7,500 2,045,069 1,613,315 3,658,384

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 49,447 75,483 33,412 67,553 2,000 227,894 174,698 402,593 RED BLUFF 92,081 140,565 58,082 125,797 3,000 419,525 325,325 744,850 TEHAMA 2,890 4,412 6,473 3,949 1,000 18,724 10,212 28,936

TRINITY COUNTY
20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 171,084 261,166 95,467 233,728 6,000 767,445 604,446 1,371,891 EXETER 70,951 108,309 42,401 96,930 3,000 321,592 250,673 572,265 FARMERSVILLE 73,080 111,560 43,529 99,839 3,000 331,008 258,195 589,203 LINDSAY 84,455 128,923 49,558 115,379 3,000 381,314 298,382 679,696 PORTERVILLE 384,343 586,714 208,486 525,074 7,500 1,712,118 1,357,901 3,070,019 TULARE 446,765 682,003 241,567 610,352 7,500 1,988,187 1,578,439 3,566,627 VISALIA 898,446 1,371,512 480,939 1,227,421 10,000 3,988,318 3,174,248 7,162,566 WOODLAKE 51,963 79,324 32,338 70,990 2,000 236,615 183,588 420,204

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 31,633 48,290 33,995 43,216 1,000 158,135 111,762 269,897

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 449,746 686,554 283,075 614,425 7,500 2,041,299 1,588,970 3,630,269 FILLMORE 101,984 155,683 67,902 139,327 4,000 468,896 360,315 829,211 MOORPARK 232,144 354,377 148,437 317,146 6,000 1,058,103 820,175 1,878,278 OJAI 48,137 73,483 34,584 65,763 2,000 223,968 170,071 394,039 OXNARD 1,320,532 2,015,843 821,865 1,804,059 10,000 5,972,299 4,665,497 10,637,796 PORT HUENEME 150,806 230,210 98,109 206,025 5,000 690,150 532,802 1,222,952 SAN BUENAVENTURA 686,690 1,048,258 429,682 938,128 10,000 3,112,758 2,426,104 5,538,862 SANTA PAULA 198,014 302,275 127,319 270,519 6,000 904,126 699,591 1,603,717 SIMI VALLEY 803,049 1,225,884 501,678 1,097,094 10,000 3,637,704 2,837,206 6,474,910 THOUSAND OAKS 817,340 1,247,700 510,520 1,116,617 10,000 3,702,177 2,887,696 6,589,873

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 447,081 682,486 267,494 610,784 7,500 2,015,345 1,579,556 3,594,901 WEST SACRAMENTO 348,187 531,521 209,386 475,679 7,500 1,572,273 1,230,160 2,802,433 WINTERS 49,150 75,030 33,679 67,147 2,000 227,006 173,650 400,656 WOODLAND 393,421 600,572 235,965 537,476 7,500 1,774,933 1,389,973 3,164,906

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 78,719 120,168 46,709 107,543 3,000 356,139 278,118 634,256 WHEATLAND 23,291 35,555 17,200 31,819 1,000 108,865 82,289 191,154 Statewide Total $ 213,449,000 325,838,000 $ 124,134,540 $ 296,829,500 $ 2,709,500 $ 962,960,540 $ 754,124,500 $ 1,717,085,040 $ Notes:

3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16

ATTACHMENT C
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues Source: CSAC Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Maintnc
Sec2103 (2) Sec2104 Sec2105 Sec2106 HUTA Rehab Acct
ALAMEDA COUNTY 13,650,512 8,384,599 6,221,435 408,166 28,664,712 20,479,305 49,144,017 ALPINE COUNTY 163,137 290,232 138,185 22,026 613,580 398,462 1,012,042 AMADOR COUNTY 810,831 708,673 521,894 190,283 2,231,681 1,980,446 4,212,127 BUTTE COUNTY 2,465,206 2,743,491 1,765,859 412,978 7,387,534 6,700,952 14,088,486 CALAVERAS COUNTY 1,009,598 1,230,752 792,178 318,937 3,351,465 3,006,100 6,357,565 COLUSA COUNTY 959,880 610,599 617,831 116,346 2,304,656 2,344,498 4,649,154 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 11,120,564 7,100,212 5,320,608 902,502 24,443,886 17,342,201 41,786,087 DEL NORTE COUNTY 498,548 329,733 320,893 109,330 1,258,504 1,217,700 2,476,204 EL DORADO COUNTY 3,605,610 2,598,594 1,953,012 807,644 8,964,860 6,347,042 15,311,902 FRESNO COUNTY 9,545,885 9,126,793 5,874,497 1,182,329 25,729,504 22,292,105 48,021,609 GLENN COUNTY 749,033 1,171,307 753,916 139,338 2,813,594 2,860,906 5,674,500 HUMBOLDT COUNTY 1,727,952 2,232,827 1,437,168 401,153 5,799,100 5,453,659 11,252,759 IMPERIAL COUNTY 2,395,954 4,112,843 2,647,248 425,908 9,581,953 10,045,581 19,627,534 INYO COUNTY 960,853 1,359,102 874,791 120,061 3,314,807 3,319,593 6,634,400 KERN COUNTY 8,618,249 8,456,883 5,443,307 1,932,101 24,450,540 20,655,857 45,106,397 KINGS COUNTY 1,321,310 1,746,800 1,124,335 218,807 4,411,252 4,266,542 8,677,794 LAKE COUNTY 996,604 1,224,175 787,945 334,892 3,343,616 2,990,035 6,333,651 LASSEN COUNTY 931,481 1,175,966 756,915 125,182 2,989,544 2,872,285 5,861,829 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 82,543,840 51,110,365 37,682,591 2,608,129 173,944,925 124,836,584 298,781,509 MADERA COUNTY 1,689,334 2,559,216 1,647,249 481,187 6,376,986 6,250,860 12,627,846 MARIN COUNTY 2,530,909 1,893,846 1,245,616 283,830 5,954,201 4,625,701 10,579,902 MARIPOSA COUNTY 777,078 533,752 500,169 128,686 1,939,685 1,898,005 3,837,690 MENDOCINO COUNTY 1,315,114 1,816,849 1,169,423 392,090 4,693,476 4,437,638 9,131,114 MERCED COUNTY 2,709,365 3,439,853 2,214,075 576,896 8,940,189 8,401,807 17,341,996 MODOC COUNTY 865,076 1,144,547 736,692 62,918 2,809,233 2,795,545 5,604,778 MONO COUNTY 841,522 774,487 541,649 31,320 2,188,978 2,055,408 4,244,386 MONTEREY COUNTY 4,300,505 3,818,973 2,458,097 853,162 11,430,737 9,327,804 20,758,541 NAPA COUNTY 1,553,334 1,330,957 856,676 305,000 4,045,967 3,250,850 7,296,817 NEVADA COUNTY 1,688,542 1,411,631 908,602 307,387 4,316,162 3,447,894 7,764,056 ORANGE COUNTY 29,396,802 17,344,378 13,328,114 720,956 60,790,250 42,363,479 103,153,729 PLACER COUNTY 5,930,419 3,875,029 2,980,920 805,615 13,591,983 9,464,722 23,056,705 PLUMAS COUNTY 944,250 1,042,945 607,770 149,978 2,744,943 2,306,322 5,051,265 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 22,662,148 15,407,016 10,707,660 1,534,128 50,310,952 37,631,490 87,942,442 SACRAMENTO COUNTY 14,755,142 10,893,843 7,458,174 2,098,215 35,205,374 26,608,109 61,813,483 SAN BENITO COUNTY 919,371 778,967 591,757 157,804 2,447,899 2,245,556 4,693,455 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 21,556,867 14,685,236 10,176,157 1,438,363 47,856,623 35,868,551 83,725,174 SAN DIEGO COUNTY 31,345,467 20,140,359 14,721,866 1,921,776 68,129,468 49,192,637 117,322,105 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 4,963,934 3,868,645 2,490,069 9,600 11,332,248 9,449,129 20,781,377 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 7,654,783 6,185,778 3,981,501 902,824 18,724,886 15,108,705 33,833,591 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 3,331,756 3,346,034 2,153,688 646,113 9,477,591 8,172,657 17,650,248 SAN MATEO COUNTY 7,084,220 4,425,381 3,260,044 282,555 15,052,200 10,808,951 25,861,151 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 4,351,196 3,371,461 2,272,784 784,652 10,780,093 8,234,763 19,014,856 SANTA CLARA COUNTY 16,724,552 10,331,518 7,530,666 292,619 34,879,355 25,234,635 60,113,990 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 2,788,359 2,206,086 1,511,077 626,246 7,131,768 5,388,344 12,520,112 SHASTA COUNTY 2,528,760 2,613,071 1,681,914 405,038 7,228,783 6,382,401 13,611,184 SIERRA COUNTY 457,983 432,242 294,783 33,941 1,218,949 1,118,619 2,337,568 SISKIYOU COUNTY 1,551,292 1,872,148 1,205,016 201,870 4,830,326 4,572,704 9,403,030 SOLANO COUNTY 4,581,759 3,256,965 2,116,187 200,223 10,155,134 7,955,106 18,110,240 SONOMA COUNTY 5,635,501 4,687,193 3,016,931 907,467 14,247,092 11,448,424 25,695,516 STANISLAUS COUNTY 5,616,251 4,854,217 3,124,436 716,520 14,311,424 11,856,379 26,167,803 SUTTER COUNTY 1,182,256 1,487,292 957,301 200,790 3,827,639 3,632,696 7,460,335 TEHAMA COUNTY 1,012,121 1,647,546 1,060,449 258,011 3,978,127 4,024,115 8,002,242 TRINITY COUNTY 865,414 694,559 557,027 92,469 2,209,469 2,113,765 4,323,234 TULARE COUNTY 4,635,429 5,799,942 3,733,156 726,349 14,894,876 14,166,304 29,061,180 TUOLUMNE COUNTY 1,041,148 1,143,082 735,750 314,931 3,234,911 2,791,968 6,026,879 VENTURA COUNTY 8,537,071 5,473,121 4,044,171 601,609 18,655,972 13,368,045 32,024,017 YOLO COUNTY 2,134,845 2,030,241 1,306,773 173,116 5,644,975 4,958,843 10,603,818 YUBA COUNTY 876,904 1,175,323 756,501 280,040 3,088,768 2,870,715 5,959,483 Total $ 376,370,000 280,549,500 $ 195,675,500 $ 31,682,407 $ 884,277,407 $ 617,450,500 $ 1,501,727,907 $ Notes:

Highway Users Tax Acct (1) Streets & Hwys Code TOTAL
Annual

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 1

ATTACHMENT D
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2021-22 Revenues Source: CSAC Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2022 TOTAL Road Maintnc
Sec2103 (2) Sec2104 Sec2105 Sec2106 HUTA Rehab Acct
ALAMEDA COUNTY 14,943,155 9,738,107 6,799,281 445,097 31,925,640 22,538,026 54,463,666 ALPINE COUNTY 189,472 291,006 138,822 23,178 642,478 438,518 1,080,996 AMADOR COUNTY 941,721 769,526 568,427 207,025 2,486,699 2,179,534 4,666,233 BUTTE COUNTY 2,689,120 3,186,367 1,923,306 450,354 8,249,147 7,374,578 15,623,725 CALAVERAS COUNTY 1,090,144 1,429,429 862,810 347,600 3,729,983 3,308,294 7,038,277 COLUSA COUNTY 618,822 1,114,831 672,917 126,237 2,532,807 2,580,183 5,112,990 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 12,169,278 8,246,384 5,812,307 985,236 27,213,205 19,085,558 46,298,763 DEL NORTE COUNTY 579,028 358,701 349,504 118,571 1,405,804 1,340,112 2,745,916 EL DORADO COUNTY 3,841,424 3,018,080 2,086,858 881,589 9,827,951 6,985,090 16,813,041 FRESNO COUNTY 10,429,426 10,600,111 6,398,275 1,290,993 28,718,805 24,533,062 53,251,867 GLENN COUNTY 759,470 1,360,389 821,137 151,360 3,092,356 3,148,504 6,240,860 HUMBOLDT COUNTY 1,882,752 2,593,268 1,565,308 437,433 6,478,761 6,001,899 12,480,660 IMPERIAL COUNTY 2,581,255 4,776,771 2,883,280 464,482 10,705,788 11,055,432 21,761,220 INYO COUNTY 968,610 1,578,499 952,789 130,296 3,630,194 3,653,301 7,283,495 KERN COUNTY 9,419,929 9,822,060 5,928,640 2,110,237 27,280,866 22,732,327 50,013,193 KINGS COUNTY 1,444,838 2,028,782 1,224,582 238,191 4,936,393 4,695,445 9,631,838 LAKE COUNTY 1,089,111 1,421,790 858,199 365,033 3,734,133 3,290,614 7,024,747 LASSEN COUNTY 941,314 1,365,799 824,403 135,892 3,267,408 3,161,027 6,428,435 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 90,352,288 59,361,001 41,180,840 2,848,905 193,743,034 137,386,018 331,129,052 MADERA COUNTY 1,845,212 2,972,344 1,794,120 524,884 7,136,560 6,879,240 14,015,800 MARIN COUNTY 2,767,465 2,199,565 1,359,438 309,239 6,635,707 5,090,708 11,726,415 MARIPOSA COUNTY 902,520 541,175 544,765 139,721 2,128,181 2,088,806 4,216,987 MENDOCINO COUNTY 1,434,227 2,110,140 1,273,690 427,532 5,245,589 4,883,740 10,129,329 MERCED COUNTY 2,964,656 3,995,140 2,411,485 629,461 10,000,742 9,246,415 19,247,157 MODOC COUNTY 868,878 1,329,309 802,377 67,859 3,068,423 3,076,573 6,144,996 MONO COUNTY 977,367 779,249 589,943 33,333 2,379,892 2,262,032 4,641,924 MONTEREY COUNTY 4,705,079 4,435,461 2,677,264 931,325 12,749,129 10,265,499 23,014,628 NAPA COUNTY 1,697,961 1,545,810 933,058 332,371 4,509,200 3,577,648 8,086,848 NEVADA COUNTY 1,821,213 1,639,507 989,614 334,979 4,785,313 3,794,501 8,579,814 ORANGE COUNTY 32,185,403 20,144,243 14,568,760 786,869 67,685,275 46,622,148 114,307,423 PLACER COUNTY 6,380,429 4,500,567 3,207,735 879,372 14,968,103 10,416,181 25,384,284 PLUMAS COUNTY 1,051,947 1,096,679 661,960 162,985 2,973,571 2,538,170 5,511,741 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 24,801,340 17,894,137 11,698,712 1,675,388 56,069,577 41,414,467 97,484,044 SACRAMENTO COUNTY 16,153,892 12,652,413 8,150,182 2,291,743 39,248,230 29,282,939 68,531,169 SAN BENITO COUNTY 850,504 1,067,783 644,519 171,537 2,734,343 2,471,294 5,205,637 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 23,516,073 17,055,842 11,084,584 1,570,751 53,227,250 39,474,305 92,701,555 SAN DIEGO COUNTY 34,308,131 23,391,574 16,086,429 2,098,956 75,885,090 54,137,820 130,022,910 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 5,432,760 4,493,152 2,712,087 9,600 12,647,599 10,399,021 23,046,620 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 8,379,523 7,184,335 4,336,497 985,589 20,885,944 16,627,536 37,513,480 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 3,643,284 3,886,177 2,345,714 705,092 10,580,267 8,994,229 19,574,496 SAN MATEO COUNTY 7,754,799 5,139,761 3,562,470 307,846 16,764,876 11,895,542 28,660,418 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 4,758,703 3,915,709 2,481,057 856,467 12,011,936 9,062,578 21,074,514 SANTA CLARA COUNTY 18,310,152 11,999,313 8,231,200 318,843 38,859,508 27,771,394 66,630,902 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 3,045,376 2,562,209 1,647,548 683,383 7,938,516 5,930,017 13,868,533 SHASTA COUNTY 2,749,913 3,034,893 1,831,875 441,679 8,058,360 7,024,004 15,082,364 SIERRA COUNTY 531,914 433,846 321,066 36,197 1,323,023 1,231,071 2,554,094 SISKIYOU COUNTY 1,568,684 2,174,365 1,312,456 219,686 5,275,191 5,032,384 10,307,575 SOLANO COUNTY 5,014,788 3,782,730 2,312,051 217,886 11,327,455 8,754,809 20,082,264 SONOMA COUNTY 6,163,699 5,443,836 3,285,924 990,663 15,884,122 12,599,298 28,483,420 STANISLAUS COUNTY 6,147,481 5,637,823 3,403,015 782,022 15,970,341 13,048,264 29,018,605 SUTTER COUNTY 1,292,584 1,727,382 1,042,656 218,505 4,281,127 3,997,880 8,279,007 TEHAMA COUNTY 1,032,373 1,913,505 1,155,000 281,029 4,381,907 4,428,646 8,810,553 TRINITY COUNTY 699,725 1,005,115 606,692 100,147 2,411,679 2,326,255 4,737,934 TULARE COUNTY 5,065,091 6,736,214 4,066,009 792,762 16,660,076 15,590,398 32,250,474 TUOLUMNE COUNTY 1,121,542 1,327,608 801,350 343,222 3,593,722 3,072,636 6,666,358 VENTURA COUNTY 9,339,657 6,356,635 4,416,774 656,463 20,769,529 14,711,893 35,481,422 YOLO COUNTY 2,335,598 2,357,978 1,423,286 188,267 6,305,129 5,457,341 11,762,470 YUBA COUNTY 954,416 1,365,053 823,952 305,099 3,448,520 3,159,299 6,607,819 Total $ 376,370,000 280,549,500 $ 195,675,500 $ 31,682,407 $ 884,277,407 $ 617,450,500 $ 1,501,727,907 $ Notes:

Highway Users Tax Acct (1) Streets & Hwys Code TOTAL
Annual

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 20 January 2022 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 1

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 7.e.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Rene Salas, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22- 41, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO AGREEMENT
SUBAWARD NUMBER ENP202110 WITH THE COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES FOR THE ELDERLY NUTRITION PROGRAM
(ENP) SERVICES
SUMMARY: On June 22, 2021, a one-year agreement between the County of Los Angeles through its Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services (the “County”) and the City of South El Monte (the “City”) was entered into to assist with the funding for the City’s Elderly Nutrition Program Services (the “Agreement”). The agreement will expire on June 30, 2022. This Amendment will extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2023 to provide baseline funding for the Elderly Nutrition Programs during Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-2023. Staff is requesting for City Council to authorize the City Manager to approve Amendment No. 10 to the Agreement with the County to continue providing nutrition services for seniors.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22- 41, approving Amendment No. 10 to extend existing agreement Subaward Number ENP202110 with the County of Los Angeles and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT: Amendment No. 10 will allocate an amount not-to-exceed $484,000.00 for FY 2022-23 only. This will include $450,000.00 from Title III C-1, $33,000.00 from Title III C-2 and $1,000.00 from Title III B. The minimum cash match of 12% is already appropriated in the Senior Citizen Nutrition Program C1 and C2 budgets and was done as part of the 2022-2023 budget process.

DISCUSSION: The City has provided lunch meals to seniors over the age of 60 and disabled individuals through the Congregate Meals Program and Home-Delivered Meals Program (collectively “Programs”) for more than 20 years. The Elderly Nutrition Program is administered under the guidelines of the Federal Older Americans Act, which offers meals that meet USDA dietary guidelines and are offered at the Senior Center and to

home-bound individuals. Although the Programs do not require participants to pay for meals, a donation ranging between $1.75 – $3.00 per meal is appreciated.

The County contributes to the City’s Elderly Nutrition Program Services, which offers lunch meals to seniors and provides an important opportunity for social contact and targets seniors most in need. The Congregate Meals Program serves meals in a group setting at the South El Monte Senior Center and meals are coordinated with other social services such as transportation, educational presentations, health screenings, and recreation and wellness programs. This valuable program not only delivers a daily nutritious meal, but also serves as a mechanism to check up on the client, thereby providing an additional safety inspection and furthering the ability for him or her to continue to age in place.

At the request of Los Angeles County Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services (WDACS) and in response to the California Safer at Home Initiative, the Congregate Meal Program has been suspended. The Home-Delivered Meals Program has been extended to serve every eligible South El Monte senior citizen age sixty (60) years and above. The Agreement will allow these key services to continue while complying with the requirements of the Safer at Home Initiative.

On October 13, 2020, the City Council approved an amendment (“Amendment No. 1”) to the Agreement to allocate Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Funding in the amount of $79,000.00, to increase the baseline funding from $209,000.00 to $288,000.00 during Fiscal Year 2020-21 only.

On October 27, 2020, the City Council approved an amendment (“Amendment No. 2”) to the Agreement to allocate Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Funding in the amount of $21,000.00, to increase the baseline funding from $288,000.00 to $309,000.00 during Fiscal Year 2020-21 only.

On November 2020, the City council approved an amendment (“Amendment No. 3”) to the Agreement to allocate Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Funding in the amount of $95,000.00, to increase the baseline funding from $309,000.00 to $404,000.00 during Fiscal Year 2020-21 only.

On March 23, 2021, the City Council approved an amendment (“Amendment No. 4”) to the Agreement to allocate supplemental California Department of Aging (“CDA”) Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”) funding in the amount of $65,000.00, increasing the baseline funding from $404,000.00 to $469,000.00 during FY 2020-21 only.

On June 22, 2021, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No.5”) to the Agreement to allocate Older Americans Act (OAA) baseline funding in the amount of $216,000.00 for the Elderly Nutrition Program during FY 2021-22 only. On September 14, 2021, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No.6”) to the Agreement to allocate supplemental California Department of Aging (“CDA”) Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”) funding in the amount of $57,033, increasing the baseline funding from $216,000.00 to $273,033.00 during FY 2021-22 only.

On October 26, 2021, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No. 7”) to the Agreement to extend the use of Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) funds from September 30, 2021 to December 31, 2021; and extend the use of California

Department of Aging (“CDA”) Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”) funding from September 30, 2021 through June 30, 2022.

On February 22, 2022, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No. 8”) to the Agreement to allocate supplemental California Department of Aging (“CDA”) American Rescue Plan (“ARP”) funding in the amount of $76,000.00 to increase the baseline funding from $273,033.00 to $349,033.00 for the Elderly Nutrition Program during FY 2021-22 only.

On April 26, 2022, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No. 9”) to the Agreement to allocate supplemental California Department of Aging (“CDA”) American Rescue Plan (“ARP”) funding and a transfer of baseline funding from Older Americans Act (OAA) Title III C2 to Title III C-1 in the amount of $35,000.00, increasing the baseline funding from $349,033.00 to $384,033.00 during FY 2021-22 only.

The Amendment No. 10 would do the following: (1) allocate Older Americans Act (OAA) baseline funding in the amount of $308,000.00 and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding in the amount of $176,000.00 during FY 2022-23 only, which shall be reimbursed to the City in exchange for providing defined and contracted ENP Title III C-1 and C-2 Services to be provided by the City during FY 2022-23; (2) reflect updates to Service delivery and other changes previously communicated to the City in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which required the parties to take immediate actions to remedy the impact on Services during this emergency; and (3) provide for the other miscellaneous changes.

Staff report was prepared by Andrés González, Senior Services Supervisor.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 22-41
B. ENP Allocation Letter
C. Amendment No. 10

ATTACHMENT A

RESOLUTION NO. 22-41

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH EL MONTE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO

THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY AND

SENIOR SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE ELDERLY
NUTRITION PROGRAM SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-
2022
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2020, the City Council approved an elderly nutrition program agreement with the County of Los Angeles through its Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community and Senior Services (“County”) for County funding of the City of South El Monte’s Elderly Nutrition Program (“Agreement”). The Agreement was for a one-year term commencing July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021; and
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2020, the City Council approved an amendment (“Amendment No. 1”) to the Agreement to allocate Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Funding in the amount of $79,000.00, to increase the baseline funding from $209,000.00 to $288,000.00 during Fiscal Year 2020-21 only; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2020, the City Council approved an amendment (“Amendment No. 2”) to the Agreement to allocate Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Funding in the amount of $21,000.00, to increase the baseline funding from $288,000.00 to $309,000.00 during Fiscal Year 2020-21 only; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020, the City Council approved an amendment (“Amendment No. 3”) to the Agreement to allocate Supplemental Federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Funding in the amount of $95,000.00, to increase the baseline funding from $309,000.00 to $404,000.00 during Fiscal Year 2020-21 only; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2021, the City Council approved an amendment (“Amendment No. 4”) to the Agreement to allocate supplemental California Department of Aging (“CDA”) Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”) funding in the amount of $65,000.00, to increase the baseline funding from $404,000.00 to $469,000.00 during fiscal year 2020-21 only; and
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2021, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No. 5”) to the Agreement to allocate Older Americans Act (“OAA”) baseline funding in the amount of $216,000.00 for the Elderly Nutrition Program during FY 2021-22 only; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 2021, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No. 6”) to the Agreement to allocate supplemental California Department of Aging (“CDA”) Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”) funding in the amount of $57,033.00, to increase the baseline funding from $216,000.00 to $273,033.00 during fiscal year 2021-22 only; and
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2021, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No. 7”) to the Agreement extend the use of Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA)

funds from September 30, 2021 through December 31, 2021; and extend the use of California Department of Aging (“CDA”) Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”) funding from September 30, 2021 through June 30, 2022; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, the City Council approved amendment (“Amendment No. 8”) to the Agreement to allocate supplemental California Department of Aging (“CDA”) American Rescue Plan (“ARP”) funding in the amount of $76,000, to increase the baseline funding from $273,033.00 to $349,033.00 during fiscal year 2021-22 only; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, the City approved amendment (“Amendment No. 9”) to the Agreement to allocate supplemental California Department of Aging (“CDA”) American Rescue Plan (“ARP”) funding and a transfer of baseline funding from Older Americans Act (OAA) Title III C2 to Title III C-1 in the amount of $35,000.00, to increase the baseline funding from $349,033.00 to $384,033.00 during fiscal year 2021-22 only; and WHEREAS, the City and County determined that an amendment (“Amendment No. 10”) to the Agreement is necessary to the Agreement to allocate Older Americans Act (OAA) baseline funding in the amount of $308,000.00 and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding in the amount of $176,000.00 for the Elderly Nutrition Program during FY 2022-23 only; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to approve Amendment No. 10 to the Agreement to: (1) allocate Older Americans Act (OAA) funding in the amount of $308,000.00 and allocate American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding in the amount of $176,000.00 during FY 2022-23 only, which shall be reimbursed to the City in exchange for additional defined and contracted ENP Title III C-1 and C-2 Services to be provided by the City during FY 2022-23; (2) reflect updates to Service delivery and other changes previously communicated to the City in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which required the parties to take immediate actions to remedy the impact on Services during this emergency; and (3) provide for the other changes set forth in Amendment No. 10, which is attached to the staff report accompanying this Resolution as Attachment C.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals, and each of them, are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager or her designee to execute Amendment No. 10 in substantially the form attached as Attachment C to the June 14, 2022 staff report accompanying this Resolution; and which is subject to approval by the City Attorney’s Office. The Council further directs the City Manager or her designee to take all actions necessary to effectuate Amendment No. 10.

SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2022.

Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 22-41 was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June, 2022 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT B
ENP Allocation Letter
Will be available on Monday, June 13, 2022

ATTACHMENT C

ELDERLY NUTRITION PROGRAM (ENP)
SUBAWARD NUMBER ENP202110
SUBAWARD PERIOD JULY 2020 – JUNE 2023

AMENDMENT TEN
This Amendment is made and entered into by and between

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, AGING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
(“County” or “WDACS”)
County’s Business Address
510 South Vermont Avenue, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90020
and

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
(“Contractor” or “Subrecipient”)
Subrecipient’s Business Address
1415 North Santa Anita Avenue
South El Monte, CA 91733
WHEREAS, reference is made to that certain document originally entitled “Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) Subaward Number ENP202110 Subaward Period July 2020 – June 2021” dated July 1, 2020, which is renamed as “Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) Subaward Number ENP202110 Subaward Period July 2020 – June 2023”, and the Amendments thereto (hereafter collectively referred to as “Contract” or “Subaward”); and WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into the above referenced Subaward for the purpose of providing Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) Services, which include serving congregate meals and home-delivered meals as well as conducting telephone reassurance to the older adult population in Los Angeles County (excluding the City of Los Angeles); and
WHEREAS, County and Subrecipient recognize and agree that specific terms (including, but not limited to, Contract, Subaward, Contractor, Subrecipient, Subcontract, Lower Tier Subaward, Subcontractor and Lower Tier Subrecipient) are used interchangeably throughout this Amendment in order to comply with Federal, State, and County regulations; and
WHEREAS, Subrecipient acknowledges that on July 1, 2022, County of Los Angeles Department of Aging and Disabilities (AD) will be the successor and administrating agency to this Agreement.

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 2
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, the Chair of County Board of Supervisors ("Board") proclaimed existence of a local health emergency regarding novel coronavirus ("COVID-19") in Los Angeles County;
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act ("ARPA") was signed into law, which amended Title IV of the Social Security Act 17 to add Section 603 establishing the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund ("SLFRF"); WHEREAS, County has received a direct payment of ARPA funds from the Treasury, which may only be used to cover costs incurred beginning March 3, 2021 and ending December 31, 2024, with all payments made by December 31, 2026, to respond to the public health emergency with respect to COVID-19 or negative economic impacts; WHEREAS, on July 27, 2021, the County's Board adopted a spending plan ("Spending Plan") totaling $975 million for COVID-19 related expenditures ("ARPA Funds"); WHEREAS, on November 30, 2021, the County's Board delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), or designee, to execute agreements and any and all amendments under the ARPA Spending Plan;
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to amend this Subaward to extend the term of the Subaward for one (1) year commencing on July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to also amend this Subaward to increase the unit rates for the contracted ENP Services, which are listed in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Baseline Funding Allocation for Elderly Nutrition Program Services Letter, in response to Subrecipient’s increased operational costs; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to also amend this Subaward to allocate Older Americans Act (OAA) Title III B (Supportive Services and Senior Centers) original baseline funding in the amount of $1,000, which shall be reimbursed to Subrecipient in exchange for additional defined and contracted ENP Title III B Services as specified herein to be provided by Subrecipient during Fiscal Year 2022-23; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to also amend this Subaward to allocate OAA Title III C-1 (Nutrition Services) original baseline funding in the amount of $286,000, which shall be reimbursed to Subrecipient in exchange for additional defined and contracted ENP Congregate Meal Services as specified herein to be provided by Subrecipient during Fiscal Year 2022-23; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to also amend this Subaward to allocate OAA Title III C-2 (Nutrition Services) original baseline funding in the amount of $21,000, which shall be reimbursed to Subrecipient in exchange for additional defined and contracted ENP Home-Delivered Meal Services as specified herein to be provided by Subrecipient during Fiscal Year 2022-23; and

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 3
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to also amend this Subaward to allocate federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding in the amount of $164,000, which shall be reimbursed to Subrecipient in exchange for additional defined and contracted ENP Congregate Meal Services as specified herein to be provided by Subrecipient during Fiscal Year 2022-23; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to also amend this Subaward to allocate federal ARPA funding in the amount of $12,000, which shall be reimbursed to Subrecipient in exchange for additional defined and contracted ENP Home-Delivered Meal Services as specified herein to be provided by Subrecipient during Fiscal Year 2022-23; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties to also amend this Subaward to provide for the other changes set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the Subaward provides that changes to its terms may be made in the form of a written Amendment, which is formally approved and executed by the parties.

NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

I. This Amendment shall commence on July 1, 2022, or upon execution by all parties, whichever occurs later.

II. The title of this Subaward shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) Subaward Number ENP202110 Subaward Period July 2020 – June 2023
III. Subparagraph 1.1 of Paragraph 1.0 (Applicable Documents) is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

1.1 Exhibits A, D, E, F, G1, H, I, N, O, P, Q, R, S, V, W1, W2, X1, X2, Y, AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF, and GG are attached to and form a part of this Subaward. This Subaward constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of understanding between the parties, which supersedes all previous agreements, written or oral, and all other communications between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Subaward. No change to this Subaward shall be valid unless prepared pursuant to Subparagraph 8.1 (Amendments) and signed by both parties.

IV. Subparagraph 1.6.29 is added as follows:

1.6.29 Exhibit GG (American Rescue Plan Act Requirements) V. Subparagraph 4.2.2 is added as follows:

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 4

4.2.2 The term of this Subaward shall be extended for one (1) year commencing on July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, unless sooner terminated or extended, in whole or in part, as provided in this Subaward.

VI. Subparagraph 5.1.5 is added as follows:

5.1.5 Subaward Sum Year 3 Funding Source(s)

5.1.5.1 The Subaward Sum Year 3 for this Subaward is comprised of monies which are identified by the funding source(s) or governing statute(s) listed below. The funding source(s) and governing statute(s) authorize County to use these monies to provide Program Services.

5.1.5.2 Older Americans Act (OAA) Title III B (Supportive Services and Senior Centers) original baseline funds

5.1.5.2.1 Subaward Sum: $1,000

5.1.5.2.2 Service Area: Supervisorial District 1

5.1.5.2.3 Period of Performance: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 (consistent with California Department of
Aging contract number AP-2223-19)

5.1.5.2.4 Allocation Letter: Fiscal Year 2022-23 Baseline and Federal American Rescue Plan Act Funding
Allocation for Elderly Nutrition Program Services

5.1.5.3 OAA Title III C-1 (Nutrition Services) original baseline funds

5.1.5.3.1 Subaward Sum: $286,000

5.1.5.3.2 Service Area: Supervisorial District 1

5.1.5.3.3 Period of Performance: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 (consistent with California Department of
Aging contract number AP-2223-19)

5.1.5.3.4 Allocation Letter: Fiscal Year 2022-23 Baseline and Federal American Rescue Plan Act Funding
Allocation for Elderly Nutrition Program Services

5.1.5.4 OAA Title III C-2 (Nutrition Services) original baseline funds

5.1.5.4.1 Subaward Sum: $21,000

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 5

5.1.5.4.2 Service Area: Supervisorial District 1

5.1.5.4.3 Period of Performance: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 (consistent with California Department of
Aging contract number AP-2223-19)

5.1.5.4.4 Allocation Letter: Fiscal Year 2022-23 Baseline and Federal American Rescue Plan Act Funding
Allocation for Elderly Nutrition Program Services

5.1.5.5 Federal ARPA Funds for ENP Congregate Meal Services

5.1.5.5.1 Subaward Sum: $164,000

5.1.5.5.2 Service Area: Supervisorial District 1

5.1.5.5.3 Period of Performance: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 (consistent with California Department of
Aging contract number AP-2223-19)

5.1.5.5.4 Allocation Letter: Fiscal Year 2022-23 Baseline and Federal American Rescue Plan Act Funding
Allocation for Elderly Nutrition Program Services

5.1.5.6 Federal ARPA Funds for ENP Home-Delivered Meal Services

5.1.5.6.1 Subaward Sum: $12,000

5.1.5.6.2 Service Area: Supervisorial District 1

5.1.5.6.3 Period of Performance: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 (consistent with California Department of
Aging contract number AP-2223-19)

5.1.5.6.4 Allocation Letter: Fiscal Year 2022-23 Baseline and Federal American Rescue Plan Act Funding
Allocation for Elderly Nutrition Program Services
VII. Subparagraph 5.5.7 (Subaward-Related Documents) is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

5.5.7 Subaward Related Documents

5.5.7.1 Subrecipient shall complete all Subaward-related documents in accordance with the requirements noted on each such
document, as directed by County, and pursuant to Program guidelines. Subrecipient's failure to timely submit SubawardPage 105 of 186 Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 6
related documents that are accurate and complete, as
requested or required by County, may result in suspension of payments to Subrecipient or other remedies provided by law or under this Subaward. Such documents shall include, but are not limited to, the documents outlined in Subparagraph 9.20 (Subaward Document Deliverables), Subparagraph 9.21
(Fiscal Reporting Requirements) and the following: Exhibit A (Statement of Work), Attachment 8 (Site Summary); Exhibit A (Statement of Work), Attachment 10 (Route Summary); Exhibit D (Subrecipient's Equal Employment Opportunity Certification); Exhibit F (Subrecipient's Administration); Exhibit G1
(Subrecipient Acknowledgement and Confidentiality
Agreement); Exhibit O (Charitable Contributions Certification); Exhibit R (Joint Funding Revenue Disclosure); Exhibit U (Certification of Compliance with County's Defaulted Property Tax Reduction Program); Budget exhibit(s); Mandated
Program Services exhibit(s); Exhibit Y (List of Lower Tier Subawards); Exhibit AA (Subrecipient's Compliance with
Encryption Requirements); Exhibit CC (FEMA Provisions)
(applicable only when Subaward Sums include FEMA Funds); Exhibit DD (California Civil Rights Laws Certification); Exhibit FF (COVID-19 Vaccination Certification of Compliance), and Exhibit GG (American Rescue Plan Act Requirements).

VIII. Subparagraph 5.10.4 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

5.10.4 Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN)

5.10.4.1 July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021: 2001CAOASS-00;
2001CAOACM-00; 2001CAOAHD-00; 2001CAOANS-00;
2001CACMC2-00; 2001CAHDC2-00; 2001CAHDC3-00;
SLT0198;

5.10.4.2 July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2022: 2101CAOASS-01;
2101CAOACM-01; 2101CAOAHD-01; 2101CAOANS-01;
2001CAHDC2-00; 2001CASSC3-00; 2001CAFCC3-00; and
2101CASSC6-00

5.10.4.3 July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023: 2201CAOASS-01; 2201CAOACM01; 22001CAOAHD-01; 2201CAOANS-01; and SLFRP0137 IX. Subparagraph 5.10.5 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

5.10.5 Federal Award Dates

5.10.5.1 July 1, 2020

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 7

5.10.5.2 July 1, 2021

5.10.5.3 July 1, 2022
X. Subparagraph 5.10.6 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

5.10.6 Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Dates

5.10.6.1 July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021

5.10.6.2 July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2022

5.10.6.3 July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023
XI. Subparagraph 5.10.7 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

5.10.7 Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this Action:

5.10.7.1 Original Subaward: $209,000

5.10.7.2 Amendment One: $79,000

5.10.7.2.1 Federal CARES Act Funds: $15,000

5.10.7.2.2 CDA CARES Act Funds: $64,000

5.10.7.3 Amendment Two: $21,000

5.10.7.4 Amendment Three: $95,000

5.10.7.5 Amendment Four: $65,000

5.10.7.6 Amendment Five: $516,000

5.10.7.7 Amendment Six: $57,033

5.10.7.8 Amendment Seven: $0

5.10.7.9 Amendment Eight: $76,000

5.10.7.10 Amendment Nine: $35,000

5.10.7.11 Amendment Ten: $484,000

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 8

5.10.7.11.1 Baseline Funds: $308,000

5.10.7.11.2 Federal ARPA Funds: $176,000
XII. Subparagraph 5.10.8 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

5.10.8 Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to Subrecipient (Subaward Sum):

5.10.8.1 Subaward Sum Year 1: $469,000

5.10.8.2 Subaward Sum Year 2: $384,033

5.10.8.3 Subaward Sum Year 3: $484,000
XIII. Subparagraph 5.10.9 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

5.10.9 Total Amount of Federal Award (Maximum Subaward Sum): $1,280,000 (FY 2020-21 Reallocation funds excluded)
XIV. Subparagraph 5.10.10 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

5.10.10 Federal Award Project Description

5.10.10.1 July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021: Federal Title IIIB 3BSL; Federal Title IIIC1 3C1L and NSIP C1 NC1L; Federal Title IIIC2 3C2L and NSIP C2 NC2L; Federal Title IIIC1 CRCM and Federal
Title IIIC2 CRHD; CARES Title IIIC2 HDC3; and, Federal Title IIIE 3EFL; CARES Title IIIB SSC3; and, CARES Title IIIE FCC3

5.10.10.2 July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2022: Federal Title IIIB 3BSL; Federal Title IIIC1 3C1L and NSIP C1 NC1L; Federal Title IIIC2 3C2L and NSIP C2 NC2L; Federal Title IIIC1 CRCM; Federal Title IIIC2 CRHD; CARES Title IIIC2 HDC3; CARES Title IIIB
SSC3; CARES Title IIIE FCC3; and ARP Tittle IIIB ARBL

5.10.10.3 July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023: Federal Title IIIB 3BSL; Federal Title IIIC1 3C1L and NSIP C1 NC1L; Federal Title IIIC2 3C2L and NSIP C2 NC2L; and ARP Tittle IIIB ARBL
XV. Subparagraph 8.59 COVID-19 VACCINATIONS OF SUBRECIPIENT PERSONNEL is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:

8.59 INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 9

8.59.1 Subrecipient will be required to comply with the State of California’s Cal OSHA’s regulations. California Code of Regulations Title 8 Section 3203 requires all California employers to have a written, effective Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) that addresses hazards pertaining to the particular workplace covered by the program.

XVI. Subparagraph 8.60 COVID-19 VACCINATIONS OF COUNTY CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL is added as follows:

8.60 COVID-19 VACCINATIONS OF COUNTY CONTRACTOR

PERSONNEL

8.60.1 At Subrecipient’s (that is, “Contractor’s”) sole cost, Contractor must comply with Chapter 2.212 (COVID-19 Vaccinations of County Contractor Personnel) of County Code Title 2 -
Administration, Division 4. All employees of Contractor’s and persons working on its behalf, including but not limited to, Subcontractors of any tier (collectively, “Contractor
Personnel”), must be fully vaccinated against the novel coronavirus 2019 (“COVID-19”) prior to (1) interacting in person with County employees, interns, volunteers, and
commissioners ("County workforce members"), (2) working on County owned or controlled property while performing services under this Subaward (that is, “Contract”), and/or (3) coming into contact with the public while performing services under this Contract (collectively, “In-Person Services”).

8.60.2 Contractor Personnel are considered “fully vaccinated” against COVID-19 two (2) weeks or more after they have
received (1) the second dose in a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine series (e.g., Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), (2) a single-dose COVID-19 vaccine (e.g. Johnson and Johnson
[J&J]/Janssen), or (3) the final dose of any COVID-19 vaccine authorized by the World Health Organization ("WHO").

8.60.3 Prior to assigning Contractor Personnel to perform In-Person Services, Contractor must obtain proof that such Contractor Personnel have been fully vaccinated by confirming
Contractor Personnel is vaccinated through any of the
following documentation:

8.60.3.1 Official COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card
(issued by the Department of Health and Human
Services, CDC or WHO Yellow Card), which
includes the name of the person vaccinated,

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 10
type of vaccine provided, and date of the last
dose administered ("Vaccination Record Card");

8.60.3.2 Copy (including a photographic copy) of a
Vaccination Record Card;

8.60.3.3 Documentation of vaccination from a licensed
medical provider;

8.60.3.4 A digital record that includes a quick response ("QR") code that when scanned by a SMART
HealthCard reader displays to the reader client
name, date of birth, vaccine dates, and vaccine
type, and the QR code confirms the vaccine
record as an official record of the State of
California; or

8.60.3.5 Documentation of vaccination from Contractors
who follow the CDPH vaccination records
guidelines and standards.

8.60.4 Contractor must also provide written notice to County before the start of work under this Contract that its Contractor Personnel are in compliance with the requirements of
Subparagraph 8.60.3. Contractor must retain such proof of vaccination for the document retention period set forth in this Contract, and must provide such records to the County for audit purposes, when required by County.

8.60.5 Contractor will evaluate any medical or sincerely held religious exemption request of its Contractor Personnel, as required by law. If Contractor has determined that Contractor Personnel is exempt pursuant to a medical or sincerely held religious reason, Contractor must also maintain records of the Contractor Personnel’s testing results. Contractor must provide such records to the County for audit purposes, when required by County. The unvaccinated exempt Contractor
Personnel must meet the following requirements prior to (1) interacting in person with County workforce members, (2) working on County owned or controlled property while
performing services under this Contract, and/or (3) coming into contact with the public while performing services under this Contract:

8.60.5.1 Test for COVID-19 with either a polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) or antigen test has an

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 11
Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the
FDA or is operating per the Laboratory
Developed Test requirements by the U.S.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Testing must occur at least weekly, or more
frequently as required by County or other
applicable law, regulation or order.

8.60.5.2 Wear a mask that is consistent with CDC
recommendations at all times while on County
controlled or owned property, and while
engaging with members of the public and
County workforce members.

8.60.5.3 Engage in proper physical distancing, as
determined by the applicable County
department that the Contract is with.

8.60.6 In addition to complying with the requirements of this Subparagraph 8.60, Contractor must also comply with all other applicable local, departmental, State, and federal laws, regulations, and requirements for COVID-19. A completed Exhibit FF (COVID-19 Vaccination Certification of Compliance) is a required part of any agreement with County.

XVII. Subparagraph 9.25 is added as follows:

9.25 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT REQUIREMENTS

9.25.1 In addition to the above terms and conditions and Exhibit A (Statement of Work), Subrecipient must also comply with the following American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) requirements:

9.25.1.1 Use of ARPA Funds

9.25.1.1.1 ARPA Funds.

9.25.1.1.1.1 Subrecipient will receive a
portion of County's
allocation of the ARPA
Funds to provide ENP
Services pursuant to
Exhibit A (Statement of
Work), Budget exhibit(s)
and Mandated Program

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 12
Services exhibit(s) during
the Subaward term, in
accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth in
this Subaward and Exhibit
GG, (American Rescue
Plan Act Requirements),
attached hereto and
incorporated by reference.

9.25.1.1.1.2 In addition to
Subparagraph 5.5
(Invoices and Payments),
Subrecipient’s invoices
must also comply with the
ARP Act, Treasury
regulations, guidelines,
and instructions, and
Subaward as it relates to
invoicing. any
requirements imposed by
Exhibit GG, American
Rescue Plan Act
Regulatory Requirements,
including identification of
any work using ARPA
Funds.

9.25.1.1.1.3 Subrecipient will return
ARPA Funds to County if
County determines, in its
sole discretion, any or all
of the following occurs:
(1) Subrecipient is unable
to expend the ARPA
Funds within the
applicable deadlines
provided herein; or,
(2) Subrecipient has
expended ARPA Funds
not in accordance with this
Subaward and the ARP
Act, including but not
limited to, current and

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 13
subsequent Treasury
rules, regulations,
guidelines, and
instructions, executive
orders and other
applicable laws
(collectively “Treasury
Laws and Regulations”).

9.25.1.1.1.4 ARPA Funds provided to
Subrecipient are to be
used to provide Services
in response to the COVID19 public health
emergency or its negative
economic impacts
according to this
Subaward and
incorporated Exhibits and
in accordance with
Treasury Laws and
Regulations.

9.25.1.1.2 Expenditures

9.25.1.1.2.1 ARPA Funds
expenditures made by
Subrecipient in connection
with this Subrecipient
must be in strict
compliance and
conformity with Treasury
Laws and Regulations.

ARPA Funds
expenditures incurred
must be for activities
responding to the COVID19 public health
emergency or its negative
economic impacts.

9.25.1.1.3 Administration Costs

9.25.1.1.3.1 Subrecipient agrees to
refund any unused portion

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 14
of the ARPA Funds,
including any interest
earned on the ARPA
Funds, upon completion
or termination of this
Subaward.

9.25.1.1.4 Source and Appropriation of ARPA
Funds

9.25.1.1.4.1 County’s obligation is
payable only and solely
from funds appropriated
through Treasury, and for
the purpose of this
Subaward. All ARPA
Funds appropriated by the
Board and in the event the
Board has not so
appropriated, this
Subaward will
automatically terminate for
convenience per this
Subaward. County will
endeavor to notify
Subrecipient in writing
within ten (10) days of
receipt of the nonappropriation notice.

9.25.1.1.5 Improper use of ARPA Funds

9.25.1.1.5.1 Subrecipient shall only
use ARPA Funds in
accordance with this
Subaward and
Subrecipient 's improper
use of ARPA Funds, as
determined by County, or
designee, will constitute a
material breach of
contract upon which
County, or designee, may

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 15
cancel, terminate or
suspend this Subaward.

9.25.1.2 Compliance with Laws

9.25.1.2.1 Subrecipient must comply with all
applicable requirements of federal, State,
and local laws, ordinances, executive
orders, regulations, project and
administrative requirements, policies and
any other requirements as they pertain to
the performance of this Subaward and
Treasury Laws and Regulations.

9.25.1.2.2 County Laws

9.25.1.2.2.1 Subrecipient must comply
with all applicable County
laws and policies.

9.25.1.2.3 Laws, Regulations and Guidelines

9.25.1.2.3.1 This Subaward is subject to
and incorporates the terms
of the ARP Act; 2 CFR Part
25, Universal Identifier and
System for Award
Management; as well as, 2
CFR Part 170, Reporting
Contract and Executive
Compensation Information;
2 CFR Part 200, General
Provisions (Subpart B), PreFederal Award
Requirements and Contents
of Federal Awards (Subpart
C), Post Federal; Award
Requirements (Subpart D),
Cost Principles (Subpart E),
and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards (Subpart F);
County Auditor-Controller
Contract Accounting and
Administration Handbook;
and, all amendments or

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 16
successor laws, regulations,
or guidelines thereto.

9.25.1.3 Reports and Audits

9.25.1.3.1 Subrecipient must comply with new,
amended, and revised laws, regulations
and guidelines that apply to the
performance of this Subaward.

Compliance with this Subparagraph and
any reporting or auditing requirements
shall be at no additional cost to County,
unless authorized in writing. These
requirements include, but are not limited
to:

9.25.1.3.1.1 Subrecipient will keep and
maintain all records and
documents associated with
the Services in order to
support the requirements of
the ARP Act to meet
auditing standards of 2 CFR
Part 200, Uniform
Administrative
Requirements, Cost
Principals, and Audit
Requirements for Federal
Awards, also known as the
"Super Circular" or “Uniform
Guidance,” Subpart F –
Audit Requirements.

Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance
("CFDA") number 21.027.

9.25.1.3.1.2 Compliance with the Single
Audit Act (31 USC §§ 7501-
7507) and the related
provisions of the Uniform
Guidance, 2 CFR Section
200.303 regarding internal
controls, Sections 200.330
through 200.332 regarding

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 17
Contractor monitoring and
management, Subpart F
regarding audit
requirements, and any
administrative regulation or
field memoranda
implementing the Single
Audit Act.

9.25.1.3.2 Reports

9.25.1.3.2.1 Subrecipient must comply
with all reporting
requirements by the County,
set forth in this
Subparagraph, Compliance
and Reporting Guidance as
issued and amended by
Treasury, and Treasury
Laws and Regulations.

Subrecipient must prepare
and submit financial, project
progress, monitoring,
evaluation and any other
reports as required by
County. Subrecipient must
submit reports to County in
the time and manner as
directed by County, unless
indicated below.

9.25.1.3.2.2 Subrecipient must provide
reports to County that will: (i)
identify the costs paid (and
projected to be paid) for the
ARPA Fund as of the date
provided by County; (ii)
demonstrate how
Subrecipient expended the
ARPA Funds consistent
with the use requirements
set forth in this Subaward;
(iii) identify the balance of
ARPA Funds not expended;

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 18
and, (iv) describe a plan for
expenditure of unspent
ARPA Funds on or before
December 31, 2024.

9.25.1.3.2.3 At any time during the term
of this Subaward, County
may, in its sole discretion,
request that Subrecipient
provide County with
additional progress reports
not otherwise identified in
this Subparagraph in the
form specified by County, to
ensure that Subrecipient is
meeting the requirements of
this Subaward and in
accordance with Treasury
Laws and Regulations.

9.25.1.3.2.4 Subrecipient must provide a
certification, in a form
provided by County, signed
by the Subrecipient 's
Authorized Representative,
with each report required
under this Subparagraph
that the statements
contained in the report are
true and that the
expenditures described in
the report comply with the
uses permitted under this
Subaward.

9.25.1.3.2.5 Subrecipient must maintain
supporting documentation
for the reports required by
this Subparagraph
consistent with the
requirements of this
Subaward.

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 19
(1) A general ledger and
subsidiary ledgers
used to account for: (a)
the receipt of ARPA
Funds payments
made; and, (b) the
disbursements from
such ARPA Funds
payments to meet
eligible expenses
related to the public
health emergency due
to COVID-19;
(2) Administrative costs
incurred related to
administration of the
ARPA Funds; and,
(3) Any other documents
reasonably requested
by County.

9.25.1.3.2.6 Subrecipient will provide
monthly reports to the
County on data related to
Services performed under
this Subaward, as specified
by the County, which may
include: job creation, grants,
outcomes, expenditures,
and project-specific metrics
by geography or other
criteria in relation to this
Subaward. Subrecipient
understands and agrees to
allow the County to include
any and all information on
the County’s website(s), as
solely determined by the
County.

9.25.1.3.3 Audits

9.25.1.3.3.1 County will audit
Subrecipient's use of ARPA
Funds in accordance with

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 20
County's policy and
Treasury Laws and
Regulations. County, or its
designees, or the federal or
State government each
have the authority to audit,
investigate, examine and
make excerpts or transcripts
from records, including all
Subrecipient 's invoices,
materials, payrolls, records
of personnel, conditions of
employment and other data
relating to all matters
covered by this Subaward.

Audits may also be
conducted by federal, State,
or local funding source
agencies.

9.25.1.3.3.2 County, or its authorized
representatives, must, at all
times during the term of this
Subaward, and until March
31, 2032, have access, for
the purpose of audit or
inspection, to any and all
books, documents, papers,
records, property, and
premises of Subrecipient.

Subrecipient's staff will
cooperate fully with
authorized auditors when
they conduct audits and
examinations of
Subrecipient's use of ARPA
Funds.

9.25.1.3.3.3 A financial audit of
Subrecipient's performance
under this Subaward will be
conducted at County's
discretion. If indications of
misappropriation or

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 21
misapplication of the ARPA
Funds of this Subaward
cause County to require a
special audit, the cost of the
audit at the sole expense of
Subrecipient.

9.25.1.3.4 Failure of Subrecipient to comply with the
requirements of this Subparagraph will
constitute a material breach of this
Subaward upon which County, through its
designee, may cancel, terminate or
suspend this Subaward.

9.25.1.3.5 Upon an audit finding of misuse of funds,
disallowed costs, or noncompliance with
Treasury Laws and Regulations or this
Subaward, Subrecipient must refund any
misused ARPA Funds, disallowed costs,
or ARPA Funds found to be out of
compliance with Treasury Laws and
Regulations or this Subaward, including
any interest earned.

9.25.1.4 Maintenance of Records

9.25.1.4.1 Maintenance of Records and
Financial Documents

9.25.1.4.1.1 Subrecipient must maintain
records and financial
documents in accordance
with the laws, regulations
and guidelines, and have
sufficient evidence to
demonstrate compliance
with Treasury Laws and
Regulations. Subrecipient
must ensure that its
employees furnish such
information and supporting
documentation, which, in the
judgment of County
representatives, may be
relevant to substantiate

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 22
Subrecipient's use or
expenditure of the ARPA
Funds and Subrecipient's
compliance with this
Subaward and Treasury
Laws and Regulations.

Subrecipient must also
comply, and must ensure
that its lower tier
subrecipients comply, with
the records retention and
access requirements
contained in Treasury Laws
and Regulations. To the
extent two applicable
retention periods apply or
overlap, Subrecipient must
maintain records in
accordance with the longer
period.

9.25.1.4.2 Examination of Records

9.25.1.4.2.1 In accordance with federal,
State, or local law and
pursuant to this Subaward, at
any time during normal
business hours and as often
as either County, its
designees, or the federal or
State government may deem
necessary, Subrecipient
must make available for
examination all of its records
and financial documents with
respect to all matters
covered by this Subaward.

9.25.1.4.3 Records Retention

9.25.1.4.3.1 Subrecipient must maintain,
and permit on-site
inspections and access of
such property, personnel,

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 23
financial and other records
and accounts as are
considered necessary by
County to assure proper
accounting for the ARPA
Funds allocated by County
to Subrecipient during the
term of this Subaward and
up to December 31, 2031 or
for a period of five (5) years
after final payment is made
using ARPA Funds, which
ever date is later, in
compliance with the
Treasury Laws and
Regulations on records
retention, and any other
applicable laws or
regulations. To the extent
two applicable retention
periods apply or overlap,
Subrecipient must maintain
records in accordance with
the longer period.

9.25.1.5 Project Integrity

9.25.1.5.1 Subrecipient must maintain and implement
practices to protect the integrity of the ENP
Services and the ARPA Funds, and
Subrecipient must immediately report any
suspected or confirmed waste, fraud, or
abuse of ARPA Funds under this
Subaward to County. Reportable activity
includes but is not limited to: any material
misrepresentation and/or falsification of
applicant or eligibility information to secure
benefits/awards under this ENP Services;
any attempt to solicit or provide improper
consideration, in any form, either directly or
through an intermediary, to any County
officer, public official, or agent to secure
benefits, or favorable treatment or
advantage in obtaining such benefits; any

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 24
action designed to improperly influence
any determination with respect to an award
under this Subaward, or information that
anyone with decision making responsibility
under this Subaward has any financial
interest in or receives any benefit from
it. Such reports may also be made to
County Fraud Hotline at (800) 544-6861 or
online at http://fraud.lacounty.gov.

XVIII. Paragraph 10.0 is added as follows:

10.0 SURVIVAL

10.1 In addition to any terms and conditions of this Subaward that expressly survive expiration or termination of this Subaward by their terms, the following provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Subaward for any reason:

Paragraph 1 (Applicable Documents)
Paragraph 2 (Definitions and Headings)
Paragraph 3 (Work)
Subparagraph 5.4 (No Payment for Services Provided Following Expiration or Termination of Subaward)
Subparagraph 7.6 (Confidentiality)
Subparagraph 8.1 (Amendments)
Subparagraph 8.2 (Assignment and Delegation/Mergers or
Acquisitions)
Subparagraph 8.6.2 (of Subparagraph 8.6, Compliance with Applicable Laws)
Subparagraph 8.19 (Fair Labor Standards)
Subparagraph 8.20 (Force Majeure)
Subparagraph 8.21 (Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue) Subparagraph 8.23 (Indemnification)
Subparagraph 8.24 (General Provisions for all Insurance Coverage)

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 25
Subparagraph 8.25 (Insurance Coverage)
Subparagraph 8.26 (Liquidated Damages)
Subparagraph 8.34 (Notices)
Subparagraph 8.38 (Record Retention and Inspection and Audit Settlement)
Subparagraph 8.42 (Termination for Convenience)
Subparagraph 8.43 (Termination for Default)
Subparagraph 8.48 (Validity)
Subparagraph 8.49 (Wavier)
Subparagraph 8.58 (Prohibition from Participation in Future Solicitation(s))
Subparagraph 9.11 (Ownership of Materials, Software and Copyright)
Subparagraph 9.12 (Patent, Copyright and Trade Secret
Indemnification)
Paragraph 10 (Survival)
XIX. “Exhibit E (County’s Administration)” for FY 2022-23 is added as an addendum to “Exhibit E (County’s Administration)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XX. “Exhibit F (Subrecipient’s Administration)” for FY 2022-23 is added as an addendum to “Exhibit F (Subrecipient’s Administration)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXI. “Exhibit O (Charitable Contributions Certificate)” for FY 2022-23 is added as an addendum to “Exhibit O (Charitable Contributions Certificate)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXII. “Exhibit R (Joint Funding Revenue Disclosure)” for FY 2022-23 is added as an addendum to “Exhibit R (Joint Funding Revenue Disclosure)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXIII. “Exhibit W1 (Budget) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Baseline Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit W1 (Budget)", and is incorporated herein by reference.

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 26
XXIV. “Exhibit W1 (Budget) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Federal ARPA Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit W1 (Budget)", and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXV. “Exhibit W2 (Budget) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Baseline Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit W2 (Budget)", and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXVI. “Exhibit W2 (Budget) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Federal ARPA Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit W2 (Budget)", and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXVII. “Exhibit W3 (Budget) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Baseline Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit W3 (Budget)", and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXVIII. “Exhibit X1 (Mandated Program Services) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Baseline Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit X1 (Mandated Program Service)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXIX. “Exhibit X1 (Mandated Program Services) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Federal ARPA Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit X1 (Mandated Program Service)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXX. “Exhibit X2 (Mandated Program Services) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Baseline Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit X2 (Mandated Program Services)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXXI. “Exhibit X2 (Mandated Program Services) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Federal ARPA Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit X2 (Mandated Program Services)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXXII. “Exhibit X3 (Mandated Program Services) Amendment 10 {FY 2022-23 Baseline Funding}” is added, is an addendum to "Exhibit X3 (Mandated Program Services)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXXIII. “Exhibit Y (List of Lower Tier Subawards)” for FY 2022-23 is added as an addendum to “Exhibit Y (List of Lower Tier Subawards)”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXXIV. “Exhibit GG (American Rescue Plan Act Requirements)” is added as an Attachment to this Subaward and is incorporated herein by reference.

XXXV. The "Fiscal Year 2022-23 Baseline and Federal American Rescue Plan Act Funding Allocation for Elderly Nutrition Program Services" funding allocation letter is incorporated herein by reference.

Elderly Nutrition Program
Subaward Number ENP202110
Amendment Ten Page 27
All other terms and conditions of the Subaward shall remain in full force and effect. //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles has caused this Amendment Ten to be subscribed on its behalf by the Acting Director of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services, and the Subrecipient has subscribed the same through its Authorized Representative. The Authorized Representative(s) signing on behalf of Subrecipient warrants under penalty of perjury that he or she is authorized to bind Subrecipient.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
By
Otto Solórzano, Acting Director Date
County of Los Angeles
Workforce Development, Aging
and Community Services

SUBRECIPIENT
City of South El Monte
Subrecipient’s Legal Name
ENP202110
Subaward Number
By
Name of Authorized Date
Representative

Title
Approved as to Form:

Signature

OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL
Dawyn R. Harrison, Acting County Counsel
By
Name of Authorized Representative Date
By for
Lawrence M. Green
Senior Deputy County Counsel
Title

Signature

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Rene Salas, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-42, APPROVING

AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL

MONTE AND HARRY WONG FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR TO

OPERATE A CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET (CFM) IN THE
CITY
SUMMARY: The City of South El Monte recognizes the importance of having a vibrant farmers market that is a positive reflection of the South El Monte community. The City desires to hire Harry Wong as a “Consultant” to operate a Certified Farmers Market (CFM) in the City of South El Monte every Thursday from 9:00 am to 2:00 pm for the duration of one year with the option to extend the term for two additional one-year terms.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22- 42, authorizing the City Manager to finalize and execute an agreement with Harry Wong to operate a Certified Farmers Market in front of the Community Center.

FISCAL IMPACT: The City will receive new annual revenue in the form fifty percent (50%) of vendor fees collected by the Consultant. Additionally, the City will receive a portion of the sales tax generated from vendors selling crafts and goods who are required to report sales. The City will pay an amount not to exceed $2,600.00 for services completed by the Consultant to recruit farmers and vendors and procure the necessary permits and licenses to operate the farmers market. Finally, the City will waive all applicable City permit fees.

DISCUSSION: Harry Wong, a local CFM operator, will coordinate, setup, and manage a CFM for the South El Monte community that offers fresh fruit and vegetables direct from certified farmers, grass fed beef, fresh fish, flowers, eggs, local honey, and gourmet artisan food specialties for customers and visitors who attend each week.

Since 1997, Harry Wong has been managing CFMs throughout the San Gabriel Valley including the Alhambra Certified Farmers Market, East Los Angeles Certified Farmers Market, Irwindale Certified Farmers Market, and the San Fernando Certified Farmers

Market, among other annual special events.

Harry Wong is known for his ability to showcase high quality, trend setting fruits and vegetables which have provided a source of education for numerous food editors and writers around the San Gabriel Valley who come to Farmers Markets just to learn about the variety of produce that are offered. They have an extensive special events and promotion program that include annual fruit festivals, monthly comparative tasting events, and cooking and gardening demonstrations.
“Certified Farmers Markets” and “Certified Producers” are certified and regulated by the State of California. It is illegal for farmers to buy and re-sell agricultural products at a Certified Farmers Market. A CFM is a location, certified by the Agricultural Commissioner, where a producer sells only their fruits and vegetables directly to consumers. Certified Producers enjoy the exemptions of certain State regulations that require strict packing, labeling, size and grading standards. These exemptions foster the freshness a CFM in California’s product availability that enhances every CFM in California.

Harry Wong will manage a CFM in front of the Community Center every Thursday from 9:00am-2:00pm, rain or shine, and will encourage vendors to stay through the evening during the City’s Summer Concert season. They will take responsibility for all State and County permits and will set up and tear down the Farmers Market.

Staff report was prepared by Andrés González, Senior Services Supervisor.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 22-42

ATTACHMENT A

RESOLUTION NO. 22-42

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SOUTH EL MONTE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY AND HARRY WONG TO OPERATE A

CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKET ON CITY PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1530 CENTRAL AVENUE, SOUTH EL MONTE,
CA 91733
WHEREAS, the City of South El Monte desires to provide a Certified Farmers Market located within the driveway located at 1530 Central Avenue, South El Monte CA 91733 in the City, which is also known as Assessor Parcel Number 8116-022-906 (“City Parcel”); and
WHEREAS, Consultant Harry Wong demonstrated the capability and expertise to operate such a market during meetings with City staff; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has the skill, ability, and experience to provide this service and has committed to a broad advertising and marketing campaign to promote the market; and WHEREAS, the Certified Farmers Market will commence on the second Thursday in July at 9:00 a.m. and continue for the duration of one year with the option to extend the term for two additional one-year terms; and
WHEREAS, the City determined that an agreement with the Consultant Harry Wong is necessary to operate a Certified Farmers Market consistent with the negotiated provisions including a term of one-year with the option to renew for two additional one-year terms; and WHEREAS, for the services rendered by the Consultant Harry Wong the total for the agreement is not to exceed $2,600.00 for services completed by the Consultant to recruit farmers and vendors and to get the necessary permits and licenses to operate the farmers market. The Consultant will also collect fifty percent (50%) of vendors’ fees collected from the Farmers Market in monthly installments beginning July 2022 and continuing throughout the term of the agreement. Finally, the City will waive all applicable City permit fees.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals, and each of them, are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the agreement which is subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney’s Office.

The Council further directs the City Manager to take all actions necessary to effectuate the agreement.

SECTION 3 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2022.

Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 22-42 was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June, 2022 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.b.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Donna Schwartz, City Clerk
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22- 43, CALLING FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022, GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION; RESOLUTION NO. 22-44,

REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (BOS) OF

THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO CONSOLIDATE (AND

SERVICE) A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD
ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL
ELECTION; AND RESOLUTION NO. 22-45, SETTING

REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATE STATEMENTS
SUMMARY: City of South El Monte’s General Municipal Election will be held Tuesday, November 8, 2022. Pursuant to State law, the City Council must officially “call” for the November 8, 2022, General Municipal Election; request the BOS of the County of Los Angeles to Consolidate (and service) a General Municipal Election to be held Tuesday, November 8, 2022, with the Statewide General Election; and approve regulations for Candidate Statements.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 22- 43, Calling Election, Resolution No. 22-44, Consolidating (and service) Election, and Resolution No. 22-45, Setting Regulations for Candidate Statements.

FISCAL IMPACT: The Los Angeles County Registrar-Record/County Clerk (RR/CC) provided an on-line cost estimate of $55,662 for the City's November 8, 2022, General Municipal Election. Staff has estimated the cost to be closer to $71,000 to include these additional costs: supplies, translation, publication of official notices, and candidate materials. Staff will request another cost estimate from the county the closer it gets to the November election.

DISCUSSION: City of South El Monte’s general municipal elections are held on the first Tuesday in November of even-numbered years. The next election will be held Tuesday, November 8, 2022. The City as a general law city, is required by law to adopt resolutions calling the election for the purpose of electing Members of the City Council. The City, if

not conducting a stand-alone election must adopt a resolution requesting the Board of Supervisors (BOS) of the County of Los Angeles Registrar Recorder/County Clerk to consolidate and service the City’s general municipal election. It is also required by law to adopt a resolution setting regulation for the preparation and monetary deposit of candidate statements which are printed in the Official Sample Ballot Booklet. The City Clerk as the Elections Officer is then required to file a certified copy of the adopted resolutions with the BOS and the Los County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk’s Office.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 22-43, Calling for Election
B. Resolution No. 22-44, Requesting BOS Consolidate and Service Election (1) C. Resolution No. 22-45, Regulating Candidate Statements

ATTACHMENT A

RESOLUTION NO. 22-43

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR THE

HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, FOR THE

ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY

THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 8, 2022, for the election of Municipal Officers; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of South El Monte, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing two Members of the City Council for the full term of four years.

SECTION 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law.

SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to coordinate with the County of Los Angeles Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

SECTION 4. That the vote center for the election shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, pursuant to Election Code § 10242, except as provided in § 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California.

SECTION 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

SECTION 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.

SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this

Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

SECTION 8. The City Council authorizes the City Clerk to administer said election and all reasonable and actual election expenses shall be paid by the City upon presentation of a properly submitted bill.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th day of June 2022. ___________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 22-43 was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June 2022 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT B

RESOLUTION NO. 22-44

A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY

COUNCIL REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO CONSOLIDATE A

GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
NOVEMBER 8, 2022, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL

ELECTION AND TO REQUEST FULL SERVICES TO THE

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE RELATING TO THE

CONDUCT TO SAID GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION

PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION
10403
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of South El Monte called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022, for the purpose of the election of two Members of the City Council and;
WHEREAS, a Statewide General Election to be held in the County of Los Angeles has been or will be called to be held on November 8, 2022; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the General and Statewide elections to be held on the same date and that within the city the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the county election department of the County of Los Angeles canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of § 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide elections on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the purpose of the election of two Members of the City Council.

SECTION 2. That the County Election Department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. The election will be held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election, including, without limitation Elections Code Section 10418.

SECTION 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the county election department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

SECTION 4. That the City of South El Monte recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for all costs.

SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the county election department of the County of Los Angeles.

SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2022. ____________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, Resolution No. 22-44 was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June 2022 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

___________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT C

RESOLUTION NO. 22-45

A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY

COUNCIL ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES

FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE

STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8,
2022
WHEREAS, §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidates statement.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE,

CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of South El Monte on November 8, 2022, may prepare a candidate’s statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate themselves. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be filed in typewritten form in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate’s nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period.

SECTION 2. FOREIGN LANGUAGE POLICY.

A. Pursuant to the Federal Voting Rights Act, candidate statements will be translated into all languages required by the County of Los Angeles. The County is required to translate candidate statements into the following languages: Spanish, Chinese, and Vietnamese.

B. The County will mail separate voter information guides and candidate statements in Spanish, Chinese and Vietnamese to only those voters who are on the county voter file as having requested a voter information guide in a particular language. The County will make the voter information guides and candidate statements in the required languages available at all polling places, on the County’s website, and in the Election Official’s office.

SECTION 3. PAYMENT.

A. Translations:

1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate statement into any required foreign language as specified in (A) and/or (B) of Section 2 above pursuant to Federal and\or State law.

2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate statement into any foreign language that is not required as specified in (A) and/or (B) of Section 2 above, pursuant to Federal and\or State law, but is requested as an option by the candidate.

B. Printing:

1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate statement in English in the main voter pamphlet.

2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate statement in a foreign language required in (A) of Section 2 above, in the main voter pamphlet.

3. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate statement in a foreign language requested by the candidate per (B) of Section 2 above, in the main voter pamphlet.

4. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate statement in a foreign language required by (A) of Section 2 above, in the facsimile voter pamphlet.

The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate statements filed pursuant to this section, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the City Clerk his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter’s pamphlet.

In the event the estimated payment is required, the estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the City Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the clerk may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS.

A. All translations shall be provided by professionally certified translators.

B. The City Clerk shall allow bold type, underlining, capitalization, indentations, bullets, leading hyphens to the same extent and manner as allowed in previous City elections.

C. The City Clerk shall comply with all recommendations and standards set forth by the California Secretary of State regarding occupational designations and other matters relating to elections.

SECTION 5. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the voter information guide.

SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued.

SECTION 7. That all previous resolutions establishing council policy on payment for candidate statements are repealed.

SECTION 8. That this resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 8, 2022 and shall then be repealed.

SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2022. ____________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 22-45, was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June 2022 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.c.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF 2022 FOURTH OF

JULY FIREWORKS STAND PERMITS
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 8.08.050 of the South El Monte Municipal Code, the City Council has the authority to grant up to eight fireworks stand permits per year to qualified organizations. Pursuant to 8.08.040, the City Administrator is required to investigate and report to the Council recommending for or against issuance of the requested permits.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council approve the permits to allow for six firework stands and for which applications have been received in conjunction with the Fourth of July, 2022. The Planning Division has reviewed the applications and found that they are in compliance with Chapter 8.08 of the South El Monte Municipal Code.

FISCAL IMPACT: The City will generate $125 per application; $100 of the application fee is a refundable deposit that will be retained until the booths are satisfactorily removed.

The net revenue of $25 per application goes toward covering the City's related administrative costs.

DISCUSSION: For the Fourth of July, 2022 commemoration, the City received six applications. Of the six applicants, five (A through E) have previously received approvals in the prior year, while the remaining applicant has applied in previous years. Below is the list of applicants for 2022:

A. Knights of Columbus #13011
B. Faith Tabernacle Men’s Ministry
C. South El Monte National Little League
D. South El Monte High School Football
E. Bobby Salcedo Memorial Foundation
F. Epiphany Catholic School PTO
For the 2022 Fourth of July celebration, fireworks may be sold and discharged between

Thursday, June 30th, 2022, and Monday, July 4th, 2022, inclusively. Section 8.08.050 of the Municipal Code states the City Council has the authority to grant up to eight fireworks stand permits per year to qualified organizations. Upon review of the six applications, Staff has determined that all six applications meet the required standards, and therefore qualify to receive a permit. All supplemental information to the applications submitted are on file with the Planning Division and may be viewed during normal operating hours.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Business License Applications
B. Location Map of Proposed Fireworks Stands for 2022

ATTACHMENT A

ATTACHMENT B

202
2 Firework Stands
Proposed Locations

ROSEMEAD

POMONA FRWY SANTA ANITA
DURFEE
PECK
MERCED
TYLER

POTRERO
CHICO
RUSH
^

1. Knights of Columbus #13011
1625 Santa Anita Ave

2. Faith Tabernacle Men's Ministries
2144 Tyler Ave

3. South El Monte National Little League
1533 Peck Rd

4. South El Monte High School Football
1858 Durfee Ave

5. Bobby Salcedo Memorial Foundation
1954 Durfee Ave
^
^2
1 ^
3 Garvey
5 ^4

6. Epiphany Catholic School PTO
10911 Michael Hunt Drive
^6

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.d.

DATE: June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rachel Barbosa, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: William Fox, Interim Finance Director
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22- 46, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC AGENCY

RETIREMENT SERVICES (PARS) ESTABLISHING A
SECTION 115 TRUST TO ADDRESS THE UNFUNDED

OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFEIT (OPEB) LIABILITY
SUMMARY: At the May 24, 2022 City Council Meeting a presentation was made by the City's Financial Advisors, Kosmont Transaction Services, analyzing the various entities that offer Section 115 Trusts to government agencies to manage their OPEB liabilities. The presentation examined rates of return on investments, transaction fees, and investment options. Direction was provided by City Council to establish a Section 115 Trust with PARS. The purpose of this presentation is to implement the Section 115 Trust agreement as directed.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council Adopt Resolution 22-46, authorizing the City to establish a tax-exempt trust administered by Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) with U.S. Bank as trustee, and its sub-adviser HighMark Capital Management, Inc., to provide investment management services for the OPEB trust and authorize City Manager or designee as the City's Plan Administrator to execute the PARS legal and administrative documents and to take required actions to implement the Section 115 Trust agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT: Establishing the OPEB Trust has no direct cash impact. The necessary funds will be withdrawn from the unrestricted reserves in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) account and then transferred into the irrevocable trust account.

There is a financial statement impact where the $1.928 million of unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities will now become a fully funded liability. The earnings from the funds invested in the OPEB Trust will eventually self-fund employee retirement medical premiums.

DISCUSSION: In 2015, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits

Other Than Pensions. GASB 75 requires the City to report costs and obligations for postemployment healthcare and other post-employment benefits (called “OPEBs”), much like the current accounting requirement to report pension obligations. The City must report its net OPEB liability (difference between the total OPEB liability and assets accumulated in an irrevocable trust) on its Financial Statements. This accounting requirement became effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Each year the City has been reporting this actuarily unfunded OPEB liability. For the most recent year reported, this amount was $1.928 million.

In an effort to help public agencies address and manage their OPEB liabilities, PARS has sought and received approval from the IRS in the form of a Private Letter Ruling on its Post-Employment Benefits Trust Program. PARS has assembled leading professionals to provide the City with the necessary services required to pre-fund the retiree health care liabilities. This would provide the City with local control over assets, investment by a professional fund management team selected and monitored by the City, with contributions and distributions from the trust determined at the discretion of the City.

The PARS OPEB Trust Program has been established as a multiple employer trust so that public agencies, regardless of size, can join the program to receive the necessary economies of scale to keep administrative fees low and avoid any setup costs. To properly offset OPEB liabilities, funds must be set aside in an exclusive benefit, irrevocable trust that cannot be accessed by creditors, in order to be accounted for as assets to reduce the liabilities on the City’s financial statements. The Section 115 Trust permits the City, under federal and state law, to invest in a more diversified array of investments to maximize investment returns in the long-term and reduce the City’s liabilities.

To date, more than 480 public agencies have adopted programs through PARS to reduce their OPEB liabilities, including local agencies such as the City of West Covina, City of Pico Rivera, City of Duarte, City of Covina, and City of Walnut.

Expected benefits offered by the PARS in their Section 115 Trust Program to the City include:
 Contributions placed in an exclusive benefit trust could address the City’s unfunded liabilities
 Investment flexibility with Section 115 Trust compared to restrictions on general fund investments
 Increased risk diversification of plan assets through different asset management than CalPERS
 Investments can be tailored to the City’s unique demographics  Oversight and control of fund management selection, monitoring of performance and ability to replace fund management based on performance criteria  Increased flexibility on the use of trust assets (i.e., trust assets can be accessed at any time as long as the assets are used to fund the City’s pension and OPEB obligations and defray reasonable expenses associated therewith)  Lower investment management and administrative expenses compared to CalPERS Pension Program
 Potential for positive rating agency and investor consideration.

PARS has partnered with US Bank to serve as trustee and its sub-adviser HighMark Capital Management, Inc., (HighMark) to provide investment management services for the program. The City Manager will be the plan administrator and the Finance Department will provide administrative support.

Funding Strategy
HighMark was selected by PARS to provide investment management services on the funding options available through the PARS Post-Employment Benefits Trust Program for all its agency members. HighMark has been providing investment management services since 1919. It is an investment advisory firm headquartered in San Francisco backed by the global strength of Union Bank and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. The firm has 44 investment professionals with an average of 22 years of industry experience and manages $20.2 billion as of December 31, 2021.

HighMark has developed five funding strategies that are utilized in the funding of the PARS Post-Employment Benefits Trust Program. Below are the funding strategies and the allocation of how member agencies have invested their funds.

Strategy Client %
Capital Appreciation (65% -85% Equity) 6%
Balanced (50-70% Equity) 10%
Moderate (40% - 60% Equity) 38%
Mod. Conservative (20-40% Equity) 35%
Conservative (5-20% Equity) 4%
Other - Customized 7%
Total 100%
The moderate portfolio strategy, with an active management approach, has been selected. This approach was selected as it provides a solid rate of return, without taking on an excessive amount of market risk. Over the last ten years, this strategy has yielded a 6.99% return on investments. Over the last five years, the rate of return has been slightly better, at 7.64%. Assuming that the future results continue at the ten year average rate of 6.99%, it will take 10.3 years for the invested funds to double. This will ensure that sufficient funds are set aside to address future OPEB expenses requirements.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 22-46
B. PARS Standard Agreement for Administrative Services

ATTACHMENT A

RESOLUTION NO. 22-46

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOUTH EL MONTE APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE

PUBLIC AGENCIES POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS TRUST

ADMINISTERED BY PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT

SERVICES (PARS)
WHEREAS, PARS has made available the PARS Public Agencies Post-Employment Benefits Trust (the “Program”) for the purpose of prefunding pension obligations and/or OPEB obligations; and
WHEREAS, the City of South El Monte (“City”) is eligible to participate in the Program, a tax-exempt trust performing an essential governmental function within the meaning of Section 115 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and the Regulations issued there under, and is a tax-exempt trust under the relevant statutory provisions of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City’s adoption and operation of the Program has no effect on any current or former employee’s entitlement to post-employment benefits; and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of post-employment benefit entitlement, if any, are governed by contracts separate from and independent of the Program; and WHEREAS, the City’s funding of the Program does not, and is not intended to, create any vested right to any benefit, nor strengthen any claim that any vested rights exists in any benefits funded by the Program; and
WHEREAS, the City reserves the right to make contributions, if any, to the Program.

NOW THEREFORE, THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the PARS Public Agencies PostEmployment Benefits Trust, effective June 14, 2022; and SECTION 2. The City Council hereby appoints the City Manager, or designee as the City’s Plan Administrator for the Program; and
SECTION 3. The City’s Plan Administrator is hereby authorized to execute the PARS legal and administrative documents on behalf of the City and to take whatever additional actions are necessary to maintain the City’s participation in the Program and to maintain compliance of any relevant regulation issued or as may be issued; therefore, authorizing City Manager to take whatever additional actions are required to administer the City’s Program.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2022.

________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 22-46 was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a Regular meeting of said Council held on the 14th day of June 2022, and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

______________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk