Agenda packet — South El Monte City Council, May 9, 2023 (part 2 of 2)

ATTACHMENT D: Project Map/Plans Showing Existing & Proposed Conditions LOCATION 17: ALLGEYER AVE & CENTRAL AVE
City of South El Monte (Sponsoring Agency) Attachment D | Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5, Part C: Application Attachments 17 Allgeyer Ave & Central Ave

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S
17 P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S
Scale 70’
✓ All-way STOP Controlled
✓ Yellow crosswalk in east leg
✓ Faded crosswalk markings
✓ Faded white “STOP AHEAD”
pavement legends
✓ “STOP AHEAD” signage
Ladder Striped Crosswalk in Yellow High Visibility
Paint (Spacing of lines selected to avoid wheel path)
Raised Pavement Markers (RPM)
Re-paint faded white “STOP” Pavement Legend and
STOP line in High Reflective Paint
Re-paint faded white “STOP AHEAD” Pavement
Legend in High Reflective Paint
STOP
AHEAD
STOP

NEW TEMPLE

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
School Warning Assembly A (CA) (SW24-1) Signage
approaching School
Install a Flashing Beacon above an LED Flashing R1-1
STOP sign
School Speed Limit Assembly C (CA) (SR4-1) Signage
approaching School

Page 148 of 357 ends

ATTACHMENT D: Project Map/Plans Showing Existing & Proposed Conditions LOCATION 18: DURFEE AVE & CENTRAL AVE
City of South El Monte (Sponsoring Agency) Attachment D | Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5, Part C: Application Attachments 18 Durfee Ave & Central Ave

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S
18 P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S
Scale 80’
✓ All-way STOP Controlled
✓ Yellow crosswalk in north leg
✓ Faded crosswalk markings
✓ Faded white “STOP AHEAD”
pavement legend in west leg
✓ “STOP AHEAD” signage in south leg
Ladder Striped Crosswalk in White High Visibility
Paint (Spacing of lines selected to avoid wheel path)
Raised Pavement Markers (RPM)
Re-paint faded white “STOP” Pavement Legend and
STOP line in High Reflective Paint
Re-paint faded white “STOP AHEAD” Pavement
Legend in High Reflective Paint
Remove existing crosswalk in north leg that leads to
driveway
STOP
AHEAD
STOP
Crosswalk leads to driveway

Page 149 of 357 ends

ATTACHMENT D: Project Map/Plans Showing Existing & Proposed Conditions LOCATION 19: PENN MAR AVE & THIENES AVE
City of South El Monte (Sponsoring Agency) Attachment D | Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5, Part C: Application Attachments 19 Penn Mar Ave & Thienes Ave

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S
19 P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S
Scale 90’
✓ STOP Controlled in the north and south
leg
✓ Yellow crosswalk in north, east, and
south legs
✓ No “School Crossing Ahead” signage
✓ Non-standard MUTCD “School
Crossing” signage
✓ No “STOP Here for Pedestrian” signage
✓ “School Warning” signage
✓ 25 mph School Speed Limit Sign
✓ Shared bike lane signage and pavement
markers along Thienes Ave
Move existing
Bike Lane Sign
further east
Ladder Striped Crosswalk in Yellow High Visibility Paint (Spacing of lines selected to avoid wheel path)
Raised Pavement Markers (RPM)
Advanced Yield Lines in White Visibility Paint (20 to 50 feet from Crosswalk)
S1-1 and W16-9P Pedestrian Ahead Signage Approaching
the Crosswalk (100 to 200 feet from Crosswalk)
Solar Powered LED (36x36) Blinking S1-1 Sign (School
Crossing) with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon and
(24x12) W16-7P Sign (Downward Facing Arrow) with
Pedestrian Push Button (All Signs are Double Sided)
R1-5 Yield Here to Pedestrians Sign
Re-paint faded white “STOP” Pavement Legend and
STOP line in High Reflective Paint
Move existing “Bicycle Lane Share the Road” sign
further east
STOP

MONTE VISTA

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

Page 150 of 357 ends

ATTACHMENT D: Project Map/Plans Showing Existing & Proposed Conditions LOCATION 20: LEAFDALE AVE & THIENES AVE
City of South El Monte (Sponsoring Agency) Attachment D | Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5, Part C: Application Attachments 20 Leafdale Ave & Thienes Ave

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S
20 P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S
Scale 50’
✓ All-way STOP Controlled
✓ Yellow crosswalk in west and south
legs
✓ Faded crosswalk markings
✓ Faded white “STOP AHEAD”
pavement legends
✓ “STOP AHEAD” signage in south leg
✓ All-way STOP Controlled
✓ Shared bike lane signage and
pavement markers along Thienes
Ave
✓
Ladder Striped Crosswalk in Yellow High Visibility
Paint (Spacing of lines selected to avoid wheel path)
Raised Pavement Markers (RPM)
Re-paint faded white “STOP” Pavement Legend and
STOP line in High Reflective Paint
Re-paint faded white “STOP AHEAD” Pavement
Legend in High Reflective Paint
STOP
AHEAD
STOP

MONTE VISTA

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

Page 151 of 357 ends

ATTACHMENT D: Project Map/Plans Showing Existing & Proposed Conditions LOCATION 21: MAXSON RD & THIENES AVE
City of South El Monte (Sponsoring Agency) Attachment D | Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5, Part C: Application Attachments 21 Maxson Rd & Thienes Ave

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S
21 P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S
Scale 50’
✓ STOP Controlled in south leg
✓ Uncontrolled in east and west leg
✓ Yellow crosswalk in south and west leg
✓ Non-standard MUTCD “School
Crossing” signage
✓ No “Pedestrian Ahead” signage
✓ Pedestrian activated flashing beacon in
west leg crosswalk
✓ No “STOP Here for Pedestrian” signage
Ladder Striped Crosswalk in Yellow High Visibility Paint (Spacing of lines selected to avoid wheel path)
Raised Pavement Markers (RPM)
Advanced Yield Lines in White Visibility Paint (20 to 50 feet from Crosswalk)
S1-1 and W16-9P Pedestrian Ahead Signage Approaching
the Crosswalk (100 to 200 feet from Crosswalk)
Replace existing nonconforming Pedestrian Activated
Flashing Beacon with Solar Powered LED (36x36) Blinking S1-1 Sign (School Crossing) with Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon and (24x12) W16-7P Sign (Downward
Facing Arrow) (All Signs are Double Sided)
R1-5 Yield Here to Pedestrians Sign
Re-paint faded white “STOP” Pavement Legend and
STOP line in High Reflective Paint
Replace existing Push Button signs with Push Button
to Turn on Warning Lights (R10-25) sign
Paint curb in red
STOP
Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacon
Replace existing Push Button
signs with Push Button to Turn
on Warning Lights (R10-25) sign

Page 152 of 357 ends

ATTACHMENT D: Project Map/Plans Showing Existing & Proposed Conditions LOCATION 22: LEXHAM AVE & ANDREWS ST
City of South El Monte (Sponsoring Agency) Attachment D | Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5, Part C: Application Attachments 22 Lexham Ave & Andrews St

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S
22 P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S
Scale 90’
✓ STOP Controlled in the east and west
legs
✓ Faded white “STOP AHEAD” pavement
legend in east and west legs
✓ “STOP AHEAD” signage in east and
west legs
✓ 25 mph Speed Limit sign and “25”
pavement legend in west leg
Install a Flashing Beacon above an LED Flashing R1-1
STOP sign on Andrew St and SB on Lexham Ave
Re-paint faded white “STOP” Pavement Legend and
STOP line in High Reflective Paint and paint new
“STOP” pavement legends and STOP line in all legs
Re-paint faded white “STOP AHEAD” Pavement
Legend in High Reflective Paint
Re-paint faded white “25” mph pavement legend in
High Reflective Paint
STOP
AHEAD
STOP
25

Page 153 of 357 ends

ATTACHMENT D: Project Map/Plans Showing Existing & Proposed Conditions LOCATION 23: FARMER AVE & SOUTH EL MONTE HIGH SCHOOL
City of South El Monte (Sponsoring Agency) Attachment D | Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5, Part C: Application Attachments 23 Farmer Ave & South El Monte High

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S
23 P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S
Scale 80’
✓ Midblock uncontrolled yellow ladder
crosswalk
✓ Faded crosswalk markings
✓ No “Pedestrian Ahead” signage
✓ No “School Crossing” signage at
crosswalk
✓ No “STOP Here for Pedestrian”
signage

SOUTH EL MONTE

HIGH SCHOOL
Ladder Striped Crosswalk in Yellow High Visibility Paint (Spacing of lines selected to avoid wheel path)
Raised Pavement Markers (RPM)
Advanced Yield Lines in White Visibility Paint (20 to 50 feet from Crosswalk)
S1-1 and W16-9P Pedestrian Ahead Signage Approaching
the Crosswalk (100 to 200 feet from Crosswalk)
Solar Powered LED (36x36) Blinking S1-1 Sign (School
Crossing) with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon and
(24x12) W16-7P Sign (Downward Facing Arrow) with
Pedestrian Push Button (All Signs are Double Sided)
R1-5 Yield Here to Pedestrians Sign
Yellow “SLOW SCHOOL XING” Pavement Legend in
Highly Reflective Paint (100 to 200 feet from
Crosswalk)
Paint curb in red

Page 154 of 357 ends

City of South El Monte
Proposal for:

Design Services for South El Monte
Safe Routes to School Pedestrian
Safety Project
ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
February 8, 2023
Submitted by:

West & Associates Engineering Inc.

ATTACHMENT C

Page 155 of 357 ends

West & Associates Engineering, Inc.  78 Anacapa Court, Foothill Ranch, CA 92610  949.716.7670 | 714.728.8082  [email protected] February 8, 2023
Rene Salas
Interim City Manager
City of South El Monte
1415 Santa Anita Ave
South El Monte, CA 91733
Proposal: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Dear Mr. Salas:

West & Associates is pleased to submit our Proposal for the South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project {ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)} for the City of South El Monte (City).

We are a small firm with extensive streetscape experience which includes both street rehabilitation and street improvement projects. Overall, our team members have been involved with over one-hundred (100) public agency projects in their respective careers. A portion of these projects have been very similar to this particular project. For example, we have recently provided Planning and Engineering Design Services for the City of Huntington Park for their ATP Cycle 4 Project and ATP Cycle 5 Project.

Our related projects are listed in Section 4 of this Proposal.

We have visited the project site and have taken photographs, which are shown in Section 1 of this Proposal. Having provided both planning (PA&ED) and design (PS&E) services for street several street projects, we are familiar with the needs of this project. In particular, we understand that this project will involve five (5) major categories of improvements, which are listed in the chart on Page 2 of Section 1 of this Proposal.

According to the City’s ATP funding application for this cycle (Cycle 5), we understand that the City has secured $130k in funding for the design of this Project and about $1.5 million in funding for the construction of this project. We understand that the project design must be optimized to ensure that construction costs are within this budget. For this reason, it will be imperative that we verify the scope presented in the RFP and Site Maps (Attachment D) with the ATP Cycle 5 Funding Application Form.

The design must conform to the provisions of the Caltrans ATP funding application. The design must also conform to the requirements of Southern California Edison (SCE) for the overhead pedestrian signals.

To keep the construction within budget, it will be important to foresee both the extent (location and limits) and type (rehabilitation method) of potential change orders for the project. We will conduct a thorough review of the Plans and Specs prior to construction in order to determine if the quantities in the Bid Schedule have sufficient capacity to cover additional work. That is, if construction were to exceed the quantities called for (in the Plans), the Bid Item quantities should mitigate such increases. Our goal for this project will be to develop solutions for the City to resolve field issues in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Our proposal has been prepared in good faith without any collusion with any other firms and the

Page 156 of 357 ends

West & Associates Engineering, Inc.  78 Anacapa Court, Foothill Ranch, CA 92610  949.716.7670 | 714.728.8082  [email protected] statements made herein are true and correct. We have reviewed the RFP and have no objections to the terms or conditions of the RFP or to the City's agreement for professional services. This proposal is valid for a period of no less than one-hundred & twenty (120) calendar days from this submittal. We also acknowledge Addendum No. 1 in Section 7 of this Proposal.

Thank you for this project opportunity. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Kev Tcharkhoutian, P.E.

Project Manager
West & Associates Engineering, Inc.
(949) 716-7670 Office
(626) 827-4231 Cell

Page 157 of 357 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
TOC: Page 1 of 1

CONTENTS

COVER LETTER

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTIONS:

1. APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK

2. SCHEDULE

3. PROJECT TEAM, KEY PERSONNEL AND RESUMES

4. COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS

5. REFERENCES

6. CITY’S STANDARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

7. ADDENDA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

8. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS
A. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COLLUSION
B. CLAIMS HISTORY

APPENDIX (SAMPLES OF WORK)

FEE ESTIMATE (SEPARATE ENVELOPE)

Page 158 of 357 ends

SECTION 1: APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 1: Page 1 of 10
Project Understanding
In accordance with the RFP and as further clarified by the City, we understand that the City of South El Monte (City) is seeking engineering consulting services for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimates (PS&E) for the construction of pedestrian safety improvements Citywide. The project involves twenty-three (23) intersections at signalized intersections and uncontrolled crossings near schools and other major destinations. The intent of the project to construct/install crosswalk striping, curb ramps, flashing beacons (overhead & RRFB), push buttons, countdown systems, speed radars, and signage in order to enhance pedestrian safety. Below is a map of the project locations:

Project Site (Exhibit Taken from RFP)
Of the 23 intersections, eighteen (18) intersections are located in residential areas and six (6) intersections are located in mixed-use or commercial areas. We understand that this project is being funded by Caltrans/State Active Transportation Program (ATP) funds. From our recent experience, we understand that the design must conform to the provisions of the Caltrans ATP funding application (provided in the RFP), including a construction budget of $1,497,000 (unless the City contributes its own funding).

SITE (TYP.)

Page 159 of 357 ends

Curb Ramps
~50 to 60 Ramps
•Exact Number of Ramps Contingent on Budget
•ATP Funding Application
•Case and Type of Ramp Varies (Mostly Case A, Type 1 or 6) Crosswalk Striping
44 Ladder-Striped Walks
•Ladder Style Crosswalk (per Caltrans Std. A24F)
•Raised Reflective Markers on Each Crosswalk
•34 Yellow Color (School Zones)
•10 White Color (Non-School Zones)
•Recommend Hi-Visibility (Thermoplastic) Material for Striping • f
Flashing Beacons/
Pedestian Signals
•Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
•Overhead Flashing Beacons
•Push Button & Pedestrian Countdown
•SCE (Edison) Coordination
Signage/Striping
•Crosswalk Ahead Sign
•Cross Here Sign
•Yield Here to Pedestrians Sign
•Stop Here for Pedestrians Sign
•Crosswalk Stop Here on Red Sign
•Turning Vehicles Yield to Pedestrians Sign
•Miscellaneous Striping ("STOP", "KEEP CLEAR" Limit Line, etc.) Trafic Signal Modifications
•One (1) Traffic Signal Modification (Permft Turn
•Recommend: Modify Permissive Left Turn to Avoid Conflict with Pedestrian Signal

Page 160 of 357 ends

SECTION 1: APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 1: Page 3 of 10
Site Visit
We have visited the project site to familiarize ourselves with the project site. In total, we visited seven (7) out of the twenty-three (23) intersections. Below are just a few of the photos we took during our site visit:

PHOTO NO.1 – SITE NO. 20 (THIENES AVE &LEAFDALE AVE) PHOTO NO.2 – SITE NO. 10 ( TYLER AVE &FINEVIEW ST) PHOTO NO.3 – SITE NO. 6 (RUSH ST &MERCED AVE) PHOTO NO.4 – SITE NO. 18 (DURFEE AVE &CENTRAL AVE) Based on our site visit, it appears that the majority of the curb ramps are not ADA-compliant. Additionally, the existing pavement in some of the 23 locations is not in good condition. For example, the pavement in Site No. 10 (shown in Photo No. 2 above), is in need of rehabilitation. Therefore, we recommend that the City consider a 1.5-inch grind and overlay in some of the intersections. This will provide sufficient safety enhancements for the pedestrians (particularly those with limited mobility).

Page 161 of 357 ends

SECTION 1: APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 1: Page 4 of 10
Project Research (Due Diligence)
To help lay the groundwork for this project, we have conducted background research on the project:
 Research of Caltrans & Greenbook Standards
From previous projects, we are very familiar with Caltrans Standard Plans for Striping (A20A to A34F). We are also very familiar with SSPWC (Greenbook) standard for curb ramps, sidewalks, and curb & gutter. The two key standards that will be used for this project include Caltrans Standard A24F (Ladder Crosswalk) and SSPWC Standard 111-5 (Case A, Type 1 & Type 6). We will reference either Caltrans or SSPWC standards in our Plans and Specifications.  Research of Los Angeles County Tract Maps (for Surveying/Mapping):

We have begun to conduct preliminary research on the County’s land records GIS database (https://dpw.lacounty.gov/sur/landrecords/), to obtain information on bearings, distances, and monuments. We located Tract Maps recorded in 1939 and 1944. Other survey records are newer (primarily 1950s & 1960s). We will indicate ROW lines based on these tract maps.  Research of City’s ATP Cycle 5 Funding Application
To get a head start on this project, we have conducted research of the City’s ATP Cycle 5 Application Form. As noted on Page 1 of this Section, we understand that the design must conform to the provisions of the Caltrans ATP funding application (provided in the RFP), including construction budget. From our research of the funding application form, we notice that the following items described or listed in the RFP do not match the Funding Application form:
 Curb Ramps: Ramps are indicated in the RFP. However, there are no (0) curb ramps indicated in the Funding Application
 Crosswalks: The number of crosswalks (striping) indicated in the Funding Application does not match the RFP (Location Maps).
 Signage: The quantity of all types of signs/signage is not explicitly indicated in the Funding Application. Only select sign types are quantified (i.e. LED Blinking Stop Signs). Given the number of signs shown in the RFP (Location Maps), the quantify of all types of signs/signage should be verified.

Therefore, we recommend that we coordinate with at or following the kickoff meeting in order to confirm the details which will be funded on this project (Caltrans or other funding). Given a construction budget of nearly $1.5 million, we are confident that there is sufficient budget for this project.

Page 162 of 357 ends

SECTION 1: APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 1: Page 5 of 10
Project Approach
To help the work be completed within a timely manner, we intend to begin work on this project upon Notice of Award (instead of at the kickoff meeting). Typically, this is up to three (3) to four (4) weeks prior to the Kickoff Meeting. The preliminary work will include data collection, outside agency coordination (Caltrans, City of El Monte, etc.), and site investigations (site walks). This will allow for a more productive kickoff meeting. Our approach is shown below:

Quality Assurance/Control of Procedures
Direct Project Management
Our project manager, Mr. Kev Tcharkhoutian, will be directly involved on this project. Instead of periodic reviews and dictations to engineering staff, he will work alongside engineering staff to ensure the work is done properly. All staff members have access to the same files and can edit as the needs arise without things being “lost-in-translation”. This drastically reduces errors during the work process.

Communication Plan
We will strive to address all issues the first time, so that the issues do not have to be re-addressed down the road, thus saving time and money. To accomplish this, we will apply the following procedures:
 Coordinate with the City to schedule meetings at such a day/time which allows the maximum number of City staff to attend the meeting (in order to provide better input for the City).  Maintain regular communication via telephone and email. Important information will be made in writing via email in order to be accessible by all parties throughout the duration of the project

1. City Staff
Notifies of Intent
to Award

2. Conduct
Preliminary Work
Data Collection
Agency Coordination
Site Walks

3. Present Needs
to City at Kickoff
Meeting

4. Obtain City
Feedback

5. Conduct a More
Effective 1st
Submittal to City
(PS&E)

6. Confirm Design
with City

7. More-Effective
Submittal to
Caltrans

8. Obtain Permit
from Caltrans &
Approval from City

Page 163 of 357 ends

SECTION 1: APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 1: Page 6 of 10
 Strive for a high level of responsiveness and timeliness with all email and telephone communication. Typically, we respond to all phone calls or emails within a few hours or less. This reduces re-work if communication corrects a design issue that would have otherwise been resolved improperly.

Quality Assurance/Control of Products
All work will go through a QA/QC process before submittal to the client. We strive to have all projects reviewed by an experienced individual not directly involved in the project, although general familiarity with the project and the client is desirable. The review of the construction documents shall focus on three key areas including: 1) quality of drafting, 2) quality of design, and 3) constructability.

Scope of Work
We acknowledge the tasks described in the RFP (Section 4 – Scope of Services). Our proposed Scope will include the entirety of the Scope described in the RFP. For clarity, we have consolidated the Scope of Work into the following major categories:

1. Phase I – Preliminary Technical Services
 RFP Task I: Project Management
 RFP Task 2: Utility Coordination/Data Collection
 RFP Task 3: Preliminary Research & Design

2. Phase II – Engineering Services
 RFP Task 4: Plans, Specifications, & Estimates

3. Phase III – Bidding, Construction, & Contract Close-Out  RFP Task 5: Bidding and Construction Support
 RFP Task 6: Prepare Record Drawings (As-Builts)
The tasks described in this section are required to complete the project (i.e. “non-optional” tasks). In addition, we have also included a few “optional” tasks. We believe that the scope of work described herein provides the best possible services for your needs.

Page 164 of 357 ends

1. Conduct a Kickoff Meeting with City staff in order to review and/or edit the Scope of Services, discuss the technical specifics of the project, develop and/or refine the project schedule, introduce key staff members, and learn the organization structure of the City project team.

2. Implement Quality Control methods to ensure quality of design and quality of services, including progress meetings (bi-weekly or as-needed).

3. Determine affected 3rd-party agencies (i.e. Caltrans, Edison/SCE, City of El Monte, etc.) and establish contact information and design requirements for the project.

4. Conduct additional site investigations to familiarize ourselves further with the project site.

Task 2 - Data Collection, Technical Research, and Topographic Survey

1. Conduct utility research within the project area, including research of all applicable utility company records. This task includes sending utility record request letters to the various utility companies. At the discretion of the City, these requests can be composed on City letter head (by West & Associates) for forwarding to the various utilities. In our experience response times are quicker when information is requested directly by the municipalities.

2. Conduct research of all available land/property records and/or survey records to verify the existing right-of-way and survey monuments for the project area and confirm ownership of the right-of-way, if necessary.

3. Review all applicable City-furnished as-builts and other record information specific to the project, including but not limited to as-built drawings.

4. Optional: As necessary, conduct a topographic field survey and prepare digital files in CAD (AutoCAD) for the preparation of plans. All surface features for all utilities within the surveyed area will be located, including valve covers, meter boxes, manholes, vaults, and other facilities.

Page 165 of 357 ends

1. Prepare 60% design plans, specifications and estimate of probable costs (PS&E’s) in accordance with the approved criteria as outlined in the Kickoff Meeting and as discussed with City staff. a. The 60% Plans will be prepared using current City Standards, other agency standards where applicable, and good engineering practice.
b. The 60% Specs will be prepared in accordance with City Standards and will be arranged in either the Greenbook format or another appropriate format. c. Cost estimates will be prepared using recent bids, manufacturers pricing, information from contractors, and/or cost index data published by professional sources

2. We will submit the 60% PS&E to City staff for review. The submittal will include hard copies of full size (36x24) plan sets, hard copies of the Specs, hard copies of the cost estimate, and electronic copies (PDFs) of the Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate.

3. We will meet and/or coordinate with City staff to receive input on the 60% PS&E.

4. Coordinate with 3rd-party agencies for permitting and/or approval.

Task 4 – 2nd Submittal (90%) Construction Documents (PS&E)

1. Prepare 90% PS&E in accordance with the 60% PS&E comments received.

2. We will submit the 90% PS&E to City staff for review. The submittal will include hard copies of full size (36x24) plan sets, hard copies of the Specs, hard copies of the cost estimate, and electronic copies (PDFs) of the Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate.

3. We will meet and/or coordinate with City staff to receive input on the 90% PS&E.

4. Coordinate with 3rd-party agencies for permitting and/or approval.

Page 166 of 357 ends

1. Prepare Final (bid-ready) design PS&E in accordance with the 90% PS&E comments received.

2. We will submit the Final PS&E to City staff for their use in advertisement/bidding. The submittal will include hard copies of full size (36x24) plan sets (Signed Mylars), hard copies of the Specs (Signed Specs), hard copies of the cost estimate, and electronic copies (PDFs) of the Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate on a CD. All final documents will be signed/stamped by a Professional Engineer.

Phase III – Bidding & Construction Support
Task 6 – Bidding Phase Services

1. Attend Pre-Bid meeting.

2. Assist City staff in responding in writing to any contractor’s questions (RFI’s) during bidding. We assume that a total of five (5) RFIs will be required.

3. Assist the City in the preparation of any addenda. We assume that up to two (2) addenda may be required.

Task 7 – Construction Phase Services

1. Attend Pre-Construction meeting.

2. Assist City staff in responding in writing to any contractor’s questions (RFI’s) during construction.

We assume that a total of ten (10) RFIs will be required.

3. Assist City staff in reviewing shop drawings, samples, equipment specifications and other submittals. We assume that approximately twenty (20) submittal reviews for purposes of this proposal.

4. Attend construction progress meetings. We assume that a total of five (5) construction progress meetings will be required.

Page 167 of 357 ends

1. Prepare final As-Built drawings incorporating any changes that occurred during the construction.

2. We will submit one (1) full size (36x24) hard copy of the as-built drawings to the Project Manager along with one (1) electronic copy on a CD. The CD will contain both PDF and AutoCAD versions of the as-built plans.

Page 168 of 357 ends

SECTION 2: SCHEDULE
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 2: Page 1 of 1
Project Schedule
We have included our project schedule to complete the Design (Final PS&E) in MS Project format. The schedule is based on an assumed start date (Kickoff Meeting) of April 3, 2023, as indicated in the RFP. We show completion of the Final PS&E within four (4) months, which is in accordance with the timeframe listed in the RFP.

Page 169 of 357 ends

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Kickoff Meeting 1 day Mon 4/3/23 Mon 4/3/23
2 Due Diligence 20 days Tue 4/4/23 Mon 5/1/23
3 Obtain Data (City Data, Utility Company, etc.) 4 wks Tue 4/4/23 Mon 5/1/23 4 Site Walks 2 days Mon 4/10/23 Tue 4/11/23
5 Required Field Work 20 days Tue 3/28/23 Mon 4/24/23
6 Prepare Base Maps (Field Survey As Necessary) 4 wks Tue 3/28/23 Mon 4/24/23 7 Permitting/Approvals (As Required) 75 days Tue 4/4/23 Mon 7/17/23 8 Preliminary Permitting Coordination (SCE/Caltrans) 4 wks Tue 4/4/23 Mon 5/1/23 9 Final Permitting Coordination (SCE/Caltrans) 8 wks Tue 5/23/23 Mon 7/17/23 10 Engineering 85 days Tue 4/11/23 Mon 8/7/23
11 60% Construction Documents 40 days Tue 4/11/23 Mon 6/5/23 12 60% PS&E 6 wks Tue 4/11/23 Mon 5/22/23
13 60% Submittal & City Review (Plan Check) 2 wks Tue 5/23/23 Mon 6/5/23 14 90% Design 30 days Tue 6/6/23 Mon 7/17/23
15 90% PS&E 4 wks Tue 6/6/23 Mon 7/3/23
16 90% Submittal & City Review (Plan Check) 2 wks Tue 7/4/23 Mon 7/17/23 17 100%/Final Design 15 days Tue 7/18/23 Mon 8/7/23
18 100%/Final PS&E 3 wks Tue 7/18/23 Mon 8/7/23
Kickoff Meeting Apr 3
Due Diligence 20 days
Obtain Data (City Data, Utility Company, etc.) 4 wks
Site Walks
Required Field Work 20 days
Prepare Base Maps (Field Survey As Necessary) 4 wks
Permitting/Approvals (As Required) 75 days
Preliminary Permitting Coordination (SCE/Caltrans) 4 wks Final Permitting Coordination (SCE/Caltrans) 8 wks
Engineering 85 days
60% Construction Documents 40 days
60% PS&E 6 wks
60% Submittal & City Review (Plan Check) 2 wks
90% Design 30 days
90% PS&E 4 wks
90% Submittal & City Review (Plan Check) 2 wks
100%/Final Design 15 days
100%/Final PS&E 3 wks
29 5 12 19 26 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 Feb '23 Mar '23 Apr '23 May '23 Jun '23 Jul '23 Aug '23 City of South El Monte
Design Services for ATP Cycle 5 Project

Page 170 of 357 ends

SECTION 3: PROJECT TEAM KEY PERSONNEL AND RESUMES
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 3 - Page 1 of 1
Organizational Chart
The project team will consist of the individuals below:

Project Team Roles
The Project Manager, Mr. Kev Tcharkhoutian, has considerable experience in public-agency projects, including with the City of South El Monte. Mr. Tcharkhoutian is familiar with permitting agencies such as Counties, Caltrans, Railroad Companies, Utility Agencies, and others. Under his guidance, the project will remain on schedule and within budget.

PROJECT MANAGER
KEV TCHARKHOUTIAN, P.E.

PHILLIP WEST, P.E., QSD/P

ENGINEERING
PHILLIP WEST, P.E., QSD/P
JAKE COMER, E.I.T.

STEPHEN WILLIAMS
WONCHUL LEE, E.I.T.

QA/QC
NABIL HENEIN, P.E. SUBCONSULTANTS*

ON POINT LAND SURVEYING
Land Surveying

SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY
& BASE MAPPING
WILL ROLPH, P.E., P.L.S.

City of South El Monte
Note: Resumes of the individuals
on this chart are provided later in
this Section.
*Subconsultant background is
provided in Section 4 of this
Proposal.

Page 171 of 357 ends

Resume
Kev Tcharkhoutian, P.E.

Project Manager/Engineer
EDUCATION:

California State University,
Long Beach
B.S. Civil Engineering, 1980
REGISTRATION:

Registered Civil Engineer, California
No. 44598
OVERVIEW:

Mr. Tcharkhoutian has over 40 years-experience in municipal civil engineering design and construction.

He has served as City Engineer or Public Works Director for several agencies throughout Southern California. Mr. Tcharkhoutian has overseen a wide variety of projects including water, sewer, storm drain, streets, parks, and grading. Mr. Tcharkhoutian previously provided QA/QC services for the City of Alhambra’s FY 20-21 Street Rehabilitation Project.

RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (CITY ENGINEER OR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR) Mr. Tcharkhoutian has served as City Engineer or Public Works Director for the following agencies:
 City of Sierra Madre
 City of El Monte
 City of South El Monte
 City of Baldwin Park

RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (OTHER AGENCY EXPERIENCE)
Mr. Tcharkhoutian has served as Principal, Senior, or Associate Engineer for the following agencies:
 City of Montebello
 City of Duarte
 City of Vernon
 City of Wildomar
 City of Colton
 City of South Gate
 City of Maywood
 City of Monrovia

RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mr. Tcharkhoutian has recently provided Inspection Services for the following projects:

CITY OF ALHAMBRA
Project management services for the City’s FY 2020-21 Street Rehabilitation Project. The project involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five streets in the City.

CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
Engineering services for Phase IV of the City’s ATP project. The services included Project Approval & Environmental Design (PA&ED) work in preparation for the solicitation of PS&E. The PA&ED phase will lay the groundwork for the completion of “complete streets” for six (6) streets, with a pedestrian focus, including bicycle routes, sharrows, curb bulbouts, zebra crosswalks, signal modifications, and signage.

Engineering services of the City and County catch basins within the limits of the City of Huntington Park.

The project involved an inventory of the catch basins to assess the rehabilitation needs of the catch basins related to clean stormwater discharges. The goal of the inspections was to determine the need for inlet screens and baskets, and to determine the cleaning needs of the catch basins.

Page 172 of 357 ends

Resume
Phillip West, P.E., QSD/QSP
Principal/Project Manager
EDUCATION:

California State University,
Long Beach
B.S. Civil Engineering
REGISTRATION:

Registered Civil Engineer, California
No. 77453
Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD)
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP)
Certificate No. 25034
OVERVIEW:

As Principal/President at West & Associates, Mr. West also serves as a Project Manager for all projects.

The entirety of Mr. West’s career has been solely focused on public clients, and he has served over sixty (60) public agency clients throughout his career. His experience has been very diverse and involves planning, design, construction management, field surveying, and even staffing augmentation. Most importantly for this particular project, a good portion of Mr. West’s background involves street design and/or construction management, including widening, medians, ADA Ramps, rehabilitation etc. A handful of these projects have involved federal funding through Caltrans.

RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mr. West has been involved with the related projects described below. These projects are only a portion of Mr. West’s overall experience:

CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
Engineering services for Phase IV of the City’s ATP project. The services first included Project Approval & Environmental Design (PA&ED) work in preparation for the PS&E phase. The services also included PS&E services for the completion of “complete streets” for six (6) streets, with a pedestrian focus, including bicycle sharrows, curb bulbouts, continental crosswalks, striping modifications, and signage.

Engineering services for Phase V of the City’s ATP project. The services included Project Approval & Environmental Design (PA&ED) work in preparation for the solicitation of PS&E. The PA&ED phase will lay the groundwork for the completion of “complete streets” for three (3) streets, with a pedestrian focus, including HAWK signal beacons and “placemaking” islands.

CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS
Engineering services for the City’s Fedde Middle School Safe Routes to School project. The project involved new curb ramps, new crosswalk striping, new speed humps, and a new overhead pedestrian traffic signal along 214th St. and Elaine Ave. in the City of Hawaiian Gardens.

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Project management services for the City’s FY 2020-21 Street Rehabilitation Project. The project involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five streets in the City.

Project management services for the City’s FY 2019-20 Street Rehabilitation Project. The project involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five streets in the City.

Page 173 of 357 ends

Resume
Project management services for the City’s Recreation Center Parking Lot Improvements project. The project involved grind & overlay, removal of curb and gutter, removal of grass parkway, removal of existing trees, construction of new parking spaces and curb islands, construction of new sidewalk and curb ramps, replacement of driveways, and installation of new striping.

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
Construction Management services for the City’s Rehabilitation of Palo Verde Avenue Project. The project involved grind and overlay, removal and replacement, curb and gutter work, ADA curb ramps, striping, and traffic signal modifications. This project also involved Caltrans coordination for funding purposes.

CITY OF CULVER CITY
Design services for the City’s Washington Blvd. and Washington Pl. streetlight improvements project. The project involved new streetlights in the City’s two main thoroughfares as well as some sidewalk, curb, gutter, street, and ramp work. Project involved nearly 6,000 feet of street.

CITY OF IRVINE
Assisted with engineering services for the City’s Barranca Parkway Pavement Restoration Project. The project involved rehabilitation of 10,000 ft. of Barranca Parkway, including grind & overlay, new driveway ramps near the Broadcom building, re-grading of certain portions of street, striping, landscaping adjustments, and adjustment of pedestrian curb ramps.

Engineering services for the City’s Culver-Alton & Culver-Main Intersection Improvements project. The project involved re-configuring of a landscaped median, re-grading of a street intersection, re-configuring of turn pocket islands, striping, landscaping adjustments, and adjustment of pedestrian curb ramps.

CITY OF MONTEBELLO
Recently provided engineering services for the City’s Beach Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The project involves removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five separate streets in the City. The total length of the project was 5,000 feet.

CITY OF RANCHOS PALOS VERDES
Engineering services for the preparation of an Infrastructure Report Card. The Infrastructure Report Card evaluated the City’s infrastructure, including the City’s streets. The Report Card provided an assessment of existing street infrastructure conditions, recommendations on rehabilitation or replacement needs, a cost estimate for infrastructure improvements of one letter grade, and the costs to improve infrastructure from the current assigned grade all the way to an “A” grade. The project also involved field site visits, presentations to City staff, and a final presentation to the City Council. The City’s street’s received an “A“ grade.

CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA
Engineering services for the City’s Melinda Road Median Extension Project. The project involves extension of an existing median in Melinda Road at Paseo Alegria near the 241 toll road. The project involves removal of concrete curbs, stamped concrete, landscaping, striping, existing asphalt pavement, and traffic signs, construction of new concrete curbs, construction of new stamped concrete, installation of new asphalt pavement, grind and overlay of asphalt for smooth “feathered” transition for drainage, installation of new project signs and posts, curb painting, and restoration of pavement striping.

Page 174 of 357 ends

Resume
Nabil Henein, P.E.

QA/QC/Field Engineer/Inspector
EDUCATION:

Ain Shams University,
Cairo, Egypt
B.S. Civil Engineering
REGISTRATION:

Registered Civil Engineer, California
No. 40764
OVERVIEW:

Mr. Henein has over 42 years-experience in municipal civil engineering design and construction. He has served as City Engineer or Public Works Director for several agencies throughout Southern California. Mr.

Henein has overseen a wide variety of projects including water, sewer, storm drain, streets, parks, and grading.

RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (CITY ENGINEER OR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR) Mr. Henein has served as City Engineer or Public Works Director for the following agencies:
 City of Buena Park
 City of Newport Beach
 City of Lynwood
 City of South El Monte
 City of Montebello

RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (OTHER AGENCY EXPERIENCE)
Mr. Henein has served as Principal, Senior, or Associate Engineer for the following agencies:
 City of Montebello
 City of Sierra Madre
 City of Huntington Park

RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mr. Henein has recently provided Inspection Services for the following projects:

CITY OF MONTEBELLO
Inspection services for the City’s Beach Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The project involves removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five separate streets in the City. The total length of the project was 5,000 feet.

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
Inspection services for the City’s FY 2021-22 Street Rehabilitation Project. The project involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on two separate streets in the City. The total length of the project was 5,000 feet.

CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
Engineering and inspection services for the City’s NPDES Program. The services included analysis of the City’s industrial and commercial properties, outreach to properties, inspection, reporting, and data management. The project goals were to provide data reporting for compliance with the LA County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) Program, under oversight by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Page 175 of 357 ends

Resume
Stephen Williams
Engineer
EDUCATION:

Penn State University,
B.S. Business (Org. Leadership)
OVERVIEW:

Mr. Williams provides engineering, surveying, construction inspection and drafting services for West & Associates. Prior to his experience in the water/wastewater industry, Mr. Williams had worked in the manufacturing industry for about 10 years, wherein he supervised a team. His skills with the finer details add to the precision of work for the project team. Mr. Comer recently provided engineering services for several street improvement projects, including Active Transportation Program (ATP) projects.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mr. Williams has been involved with the related projects described below:

CITY OF ALHAMBRA
Engineering services for the City’s FY 2021-22 Street Rehabilitation Project. The project involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five streets in the City.

Engineering services for the City’s FY 2020-21 Street Rehabilitation Project. The project involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five streets in the City.

CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA
Engineering services for the City’s Melinda Road Median Extension Project. The project involves extension of an existing median in Melinda Road at Paseo Alegria near the 241-toll road. The project involves removal of concrete curbs, stamped concrete, landscaping, striping, existing asphalt pavement, and traffic signs, construction of new concrete curbs, construction of new stamped concrete, installation of new asphalt pavement, grind and overlay of asphalt for smooth “feathered” transition for drainage, installation of new project signs and posts, curb painting, and restoration of pavement striping.

Page 176 of 357 ends

Resume
Jake Comer, E.I.T.

Engineer
EDUCATION:

California State University,
Long Beach
B.S. Civil Engineering
REGISTRATION:

Engineer-In-Training, CA (No. 18-460-16)
Licensed Engineer, CA (In Progress)
OVERVIEW:

Mr. Comer serves as an engineer for various projects, including water, sewer, and storm drain projects.

Mr. Comer has experience in hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, engineering design work with both AutoCAD and MicroStation, field data collection, and GIS analyses. The majority of Mr. Comer’s experience has been with public agencies. Mr. Comer recently provided engineering services for several street improvement projects, including Active Transportation Program (ATP) projects.

RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mr. Comer has been involved with the related projects described below and on the following page. These projects are only a portion of Mr. Comer’s overall experience:

Page 177 of 357 ends

SECTION 4: COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 4: Page 1 of 7
Company Background
West & Associates Engineering, Inc. was started in 2015 by Mr. Phillip West. We provide consulting services to clients throughout the state of California for a broad range of services, including planning, design, and construction management. In particular, we specialize in the following types of work:

Nearly all of the past experience by the West project team members has been with public agencies. As such, our focus is on public clients. Mr. West and the project team members have experience with over sixty (60) public agencies throughout Southern California. A good portion of these clients are repeat

GENERAL CIVIL / ROADWAYS
Streets & Streetscapes, Grading, Parks,
Parking Lots, etc.

FACILITIES
Wells, Pumping Stations, Lift Stations, Valve
Vaults, Tanks, Reservoirs, Structures

PIPELINES
Water Mains, Sewers, Storm Drains, Etc.

QSD/QSP SERVICES
Including preparation and inspection of
SWPPPs, WQMPS, etc.

Services Listed Include ALL
Major Phases of Work:
- Planning
- Design
- Construct. Management
Other Notable Services:
- Plan Check
- Staffing Augmentation
- Specialty Studies

Page 178 of 357 ends

SECTION 4: COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 4: Page 2 of 7
clients that the team members have worked with over the years. The following are clients that Mr. West and the project team members have worked with:
 Cities (49), including: Alhambra, Anaheim, Arcadia, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Banning, Beverly Hills, Bellflower, Blythe, Calexico, Chino, Chino Hills, Covina, Commerce, Culver City, Cypress, Glendale, Glendora, Hawaiian Gardens, Huntington Park, Inglewood, Irwindale, Irvine, Laguna Niguel, La Habra, La Palma, Lomita, Lynwood, Manhattan Beach, Moreno Valley, Norwalk, Pico Rivera, Pomona, Rancho Santa Margarita, Ranchos Palos Verdes, Rialto, Riverside, San Dimas, San Fernando, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Monica, Shafter, Sierra Madre, Simi Valley, South Pasadena, Thousand Oaks, Torrance, Ukiah, Whittier.
 Water Agencies (14), including: Azusa Light & Water, Crescenta Valley Water District, East Orange County Water District, Foothill Municipal Water District, Golden State Water Company, Irvine Ranch Water District, Kinneloa Irrigation District, Lake Arrowhead Community Services Department, Lincoln Avenue Water Company, Long Beach Water Department, Mesa Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, South Coast Water District, Valley Water Company  County Agencies (2) including: Los Angeles, San Bernardino As evident by our clients shown above, our Project Team members have served clients all over Southern California, regardless of the distance. We are very versatile and able to serve your needs! Office Location and Contact Information
We are a small California “S” Corporation. Our office is located in Foothill Ranch (Lake Forest) in Orange County, California. Mr. Phillip West acts as the Principal/President of the firm. www.westaeng.com
- Started in 2015
- California “S” Corporation (Fed I.D. No. 81-5259524)
- Contact: Phillip West, P.E., QSD/QSP
- Office: (949) 716-7670
- Cell: (714) 728-8082
- [email protected]

Page 179 of 357 ends

The following table provides general information about our company:

No. Information Requested in RFP Company Data
1 Official name and address
West & Associates Engineering, Inc.
78 Anacapa Court
Foothill Ranch, CA 92610
2 Proposer’s primary point of contact
Phillip West
(949) 716-7670
[email protected]
3 Type of entity S-Corporation
4 Corporation Numbers
Fed No. 81-5259524
CA No. C3986570
5 Totally or partially owned by another business
organization or individual?
No. Privately owned and operated.
6 Number of years Proposer has been in business
under the present business name
7 years
7 Number of years of experience the Proposer has
provided equivalent or related services
17 years
8 Failures or refusals to complete a contract? No
9 Individuals/Firms who own an interest of 10% or
greater in the firm
Mr. Phillip West, P.E.
10 Number of Employees
(Including Part-Time Support Staff)
7 11 Financial interests in other lines of business? No 12 Claims for Money or Damages History None
13 Litigation/Adverse Judgement History None
14 Termination of Contract “For Cause” History None
15 Disciplinary Actions by Professional/Governing Bodies None

Page 180 of 357 ends

SECTION 4: COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 4: Page 4 of 7
Subconsultants
Sub-consultants will help provide technical input outside of the services of West & Associates to enhance the overall quality of services provided by our team. A brief description of our sub-consultants is provided below:

Land Surveying Services:

On Point Land Surveying
1906 Orange Tree Lane,
Suite 240
Redlands, CA 92374
909.792.2221
Company Overview: Land Surveying services for California. On Point Land Surveying Inc. began in 2010 and provides surveying services for residential, commercial, and municipal projects up to $100 million.

Combined, their licensed land surveyors have over 20 years of municipal project experience, including many cities in Los Angeles and Orange Counties.

Related Project Examples
The following experience is for the West Project Team and past experience for Mr. West. A list of references who are most familiar with our work is provided later in Section 5 of this Proposal.

CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
6550 Miles Avenue, Huntington Park CA 90255
Cesar Roldan, Director of Public Works (323) 584-6320
[email protected]
West & Associates was recently involved with the City of Huntington Park on the following project(s):

1. ATP CYCLE IV PROJECT
Engineering services for Phase IV of the City’s ATP project. The services first included Project Approval & Environmental Design (PA&ED) work in preparation for the PS&E phase. The services also included PS&E services for the completion of “complete streets” for six (6) streets, with a pedestrian focus, including bicycle sharrows, curb bulbouts, continental crosswalks, striping modifications, and signage.

Overall, the project included roughly 45,000 feet of streets.

Page 181 of 357 ends

SECTION 4: COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 4: Page 5 of 7

2. ATP CYCLE V PROJECT
Engineering services for Phase V of the City’s ATP project. The services included Project Approval & Environmental Design (PA&ED) work in preparation for the solicitation of PS&E. The PA&ED phase will lay the groundwork for the completion of “complete streets” for three (3) streets, with a pedestrian focus, including HAWK signal beacons and “placemaking” islands.

CITY OF ALHAMBRA
900 New Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91801
Robert Bias, Engineer (626) 570-5062
[email protected]
West & Associates was recently involved with the City of Alhambra on the following project(s):

1. 2022 ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION PLAN
Engineering services for the City’s 2022 Alley Reconstruction Plan Project. The project involved fulldepth asphalt removal and replacement with concrete alleys at five (5) separate areas in the City.

Overall, the project includes roughly 30,000 feet of alleys.

2. FY 2021-22 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
Engineering services for the City’s FY 2021-22 SB1 Street Rehabilitation Project. The projects involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustments. Overall, the project includes roughly 15,000 feet of streets.

3. FY 2020-21 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
Engineering services for the City’s FY 2021-22 SB1 Street Rehabilitation Project. The projects involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustments. Overall, the project included roughly 30,000 feet of streets.

Page 182 of 357 ends

SECTION 4: COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 4: Page 6 of 7

CITY OF MONTEBELLO
1600 W Beverly Blvd. Montebello, CA 90640
Albert Mendoza, Deputy Director of Public Works 323-887-1200 [email protected]
West & Associates was recently involved with the City of Montebello on the following project(s):

1. BEACH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
Engineering services for the City’s Beach Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The project involves removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five separate streets in the City. The total length of the project was 5,000 feet.

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd. Sierra Madre CA 91024
Chris Cimino, Director of Public Works 626-355-7135
[email protected]
West & Associates was recently involved with the City of Sierra Madre on the following project(s):

1. FY 2020-21 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
Engineering services for the City’s FY 2020-21 Street Rehabilitation Project. The project involved pavement removal and replacement, grind and overlay, slurry seal, removal of trees, curb and gutter replacement, sidewalk replacement, sidewalk repair, driveway replacement, curb ramp replacement, restoration of pavement striping, and manhole adjustment on five separate streets in the City. The total length of the project was 10,000 feet.

2. CITY RECREATION CENTER PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Engineering services for the City’s Recreation Center Parking Lot Improvements project. The project involved grind & overlay, removal of curb and gutter, removal of grass parkway, removal of existing trees, construction of new parking spaces and curb islands, construction of new sidewalk and curb ramps, and replacement of driveways.

Page 183 of 357 ends

AGENCY PROJECT NAME
City of Alhambra 2022 Alleys Reconstruction
City of Alhambra FY 21-22 Street Rehabilitation
City of Alhambra FY 20-21 Street Rehabilitation
City of Azusa Gladstone Elementary Safe Routes to School Survey City of Baldwin Park Street Condition Assessment
City of Bellflower Palo Verde Ave Rehabilitation
City of Chino Hills Maroon Bell-Winchester Water Main Replacement City of Culver City Wash. Blvd. & Wash. Pl. Streetlight Improvements City of Hawaiian Gardens Fedde Middle School Safe Routes to School City of Huntington Park ATP Cycle IV Project
City of Huntington Park ATP Cycle V Project
City of Irvine Barranca Parkway Rehabilitation
City of Irvine Culver-Main/Culver-Alton Intersection Improvements City of Montebello Beach Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project City of Pomona District 4 Phase 1 Water Main Replacement and Street Rehabilitation City of Pomona Districts 1, 2, & 5 Water Main Replacement and Street Rehabilitation City of Pomona District 6 Phase 4 Water Main Replacement and Street Rehabilitation City Ranchos Palos Verdes Infrastructure Report Card
City of Rancho Santa Margarita Melinda Road Median Extension City of San Dimas Foothill Blvd. Rehabilitation
City of San Dimas San Dimas Canyon Rehabilitation
City of Sierra Madre FY 22-23 Street Rehabilitation
City of Sierra Madre FY 20-21 Street Rehabilitation
City of Sierra Madre FY 19-20 Street Rehabilitation
City of Sierra Madre City Recreation Center Parking Lot Improvements City of Simi Valley Lost Canyons Drive Improvements
City of San Juan Capistrano Forster Street Improvements 17 DIFFERENT CLIENTS SERVED 27 TOTAL RELATED PROJECTS

Page 184 of 357 ends

SECTION 5: REFERENCES
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 5: Page 1 of 1
References
The following key references are most familiar with our work:

CITY OF ALHAMBRA
900 New Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91801
Thomas Amare, Engineer (Water) (626) 300-1562
[email protected]
Robert Bias, Engineer (Streets) (626) 570-5062
[email protected]

CITY OF CHINO
13220 Central Avenue, Chino, CA 917110
Kevin Alamolhoda, Engineer (909) 374-2846
[email protected]

CITY OF SIERRA MADRE
232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd. Sierra Madre CA 91024
Chris Cimino, Director of Public Works (626) 355-7135
[email protected]

CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL
30111 Crown Valley Parkway Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
JC Herrera, Assistant Civil Engineer (949) 362-4382
[email protected]

CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA
22112 El Paseo, Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tri Nguyen, Principal Engineer (949) 635-1813
[email protected]

Page 185 of 357 ends

SECTION 6: AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 6 - Page 1 of 1
Statement(s)
At this time, we have no objections to the terms or conditions of the RFP or to the City’s standard agreement for professional services. Our insurance coverage meets or exceeds the minimum insurance requirements outlined in the City’s agreement for professional services. A sample copy of our insurance certificate is shown below.

Page 186 of 357 ends

SECTION 7: ADDENDA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 7 - Page 1 of 1
Statement(s)
We hereby acknowledge receipt of Addendum No. 1 (City Responses to RFP Questions), issued by the City on January 31, 2023. We understand and agree to the terms and conditions of the RFP as modified by Addendum No. 1.

Page 187 of 357 ends

ADDENDUM #1

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

TO PROVIDE DESIGN SERVICES

FOR SOUTH EL MONTE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PEDESTRIAN

SAFETY PROJECT
ATP CYCLE 5 PROJECT, ATPL-5352(023)

IN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA
Date Issued: January 31, 2023
02/08/2023 Page 188 of 357
SECTION 8: REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS/STATEMENTS
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Section 8 - Page 1 of 1
Statement(s)
In accordance with the RFP Page 8, we hereby provided the following statements:
 Our proposal has been prepared in good faith without any collusion with other firms and the statements made herein are true and correct.
 We hereby affirm that we have not experienced any claims on our projects since the formation of our company.

The RFP attachments (A & B) are provided on the following pages.

Page 189 of 357 ends

12402-0001\2179898v2.doc Approved for Use 04/26/18
Attachment A, Page 1

ATTACHMENT A

AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COLLUSION
I state that I am _____________________________________ (title) of __________________________________ (name of firm) and that I am authorized to make this affidavit on behalf of my firm, and its owners, directors, and officers. I am the person responsible in my firm for the price(s) and the amount of this Offer.

I state that:
(1) The price(s) and amount of this Offer have been arrived at independently and without consultation, communication or agreement with any other Proposer or potential Proposer. (2) That neither the price(s) nor the amount of this Offer, and neither the approximate price(s) nor approximate amount of this Offer, have been disclosed to any other firm or person who is a Proposer or potential Proposer, and they will not be disclosed before Solicitation opening. (3) No attempt has been made or will be made to induce any firm or person to refrain from bidding on this contract, or to submit an Offer higher than this Offer, or to submit any intentionally high or noncompetitive Offer or other form of complementary Offer. (4) The Offer of my firm is made in good faith and not pursuant to any agreement or discussion with, or inducement from, any firm or person to submit a complementary or other noncompetitive Offer. (5) ________________________________________ (name of firm), its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors and employees are not currently under investigation by any governmental agency and have not in the last four years been convicted of or found liable for any act prohibited by State or Federal law in any jurisdiction, involving conspiracy or collusion with respect to bidding on any public contract, except as described in the attached appendix.

I state that________________________________________ (name of firm) understands and acknowledges that the above representations are material and important, and will be relied on by the City of South El Monte in awarding the contract(s) for which this Offer is submitted. I understand and my firm understands that any misstatement in this affidavit is and shall be treated as fraudulent concealment from the City of South El Monte of the true facts relating to the submission of Offers for this contract.
_________________________________________________
(Authorized Signature)
_________________________________________________
(Name of Company/Position)
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _______ day of __________________, 20___. _________________________________________________
Notary Public for California
My Commission Expires: __________________________
West & Associates Engineering, Inc. President West & Associates Engineering, Inc. West & Associates Engineering, Inc. President, West & Associates Engineering, Inc. 8TH February 23 Page 190 of 357 12402-0001\2179898v2.doc Approved for Use 04/26/18
Attachment B, Page 1

ATTACHMENT B

CLAIMS HISTORY
Each Consultant shall submit a summary of whether or not any of the following events have occurred within the past (10) years and, if so, a brief description of the circumstances involved (including, without limitation, the names of parties involved, current status and final disposition of the matter of dispute):

Failure to disclose any circumstances requested in the following paragraphs is grounds for disqualification.
▪ Failure by Consultant or any sub-consultant to enter into a contract to which it has received an award by a public entity.
▪ Forfeiture of a bid or proposal bond by proposer or any sub-consultant. ▪ Termination for default under a contract awarded by a public entity to Consultant or any sub-consultant.
▪ Debarment of Consultant or any sub-consultant by any municipal, county, state, federal, or local agency (note: debarment is grounds for automatic disqualification). ▪ The filing of a lawsuit or arbitration in which the Consultant or a sub-consultant was a defendant or cross-defendant at any time within the past ten (10) years that involved the performance of project, program, or engineering services and that involved an amount in controversy sought to be recovered from Consultant or the sub-consultant of more than $100,000.00.
▪ Conviction of Consultant, a sub-consultant, or any of their principals or officers for violation of a state or federal antitrust law involving bid rigging, collusion, or restriction on competition between bidders, or conviction of violating any other federal or state law relating to bidding or contract performance (note: such conviction is grounds for automatic disqualification).
▪ Any publications involving firm or principals alleging or claiming corruption (such claims are grounds for automatic disqualification).
▪ Any suspension, revocation, or other disciplinary proceeding relating to a contracting or professional license issued to proposer or a sub-consultant. 02/08/2023 (NO CLAIMS) Page 191 of 357

APPENDIX
Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Appendix
Attachments
We have provided a Sample Plan from our City of Huntington Park Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 4 Project on the following page.

Page 192 of 357 ends

DWY. DWY.

DWY.

DWY. DWY. DWY.

DWY. DWY. 2823
2853 2825 2822
2880
6425 2822 2816 2825 6353
6347
6341
6518 2853
2851 6352 6350 6344 6340 DWY. DWY.

DWY. 25 WAIT HERE WAIT HERE WAIT HERE WAIT HERE WAIT HERE WAIT HERE 25 P9
P9
P9 P10 P9
P9
P9
P9
EXIST. ROW
EXIST. ROW
EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW
SEE SHT. 60

FOR IMPROVEMENTS
EXIST. ROW EXIST. SIDEWALK
EXIST. CURB
& GUTTER
EXIST. ROW
SEE SHT. 60

FOR IMPROVEMENTS
EXIST. CURB
& GUTTER
EXIST. SIDEWALK
SEE SHT. 60

FOR IMPROVEMENTS
SEE SHT. 60
FOR IMPROVEMENTS 15' 11' 11' 11' 11'
R7 L11
R7 L11
W3R7
B12 B15
R7 W3
B6
B4 B5
B2
B2
B2
B2
A2
B3
B6
R7 W3
E2
E2
P1
A2 A7
A7
A2
A2 A6
A7
P2
L8
L8
L9
L9 L8
L8
R7 W3
L7 L7
L7
L3
L3
L3 L3 8' 32' 32' 8' 80' 8' 28' 34' 10' 80' 11' 12' 11' 10' 15' 5' SEE ENGINEER'S NOTE 13
(FOR RED CURBS <5')
(TYP.)
L7 L7
(TYP.)
38+00 39+00
40+00 41+00
42+00
R7 R7
B15
B3
B3
S8 S7 S6
S6 S7 S8
B3 B12 B5 B4

REMOVALS (EXISTING)

REMOVE EXIST CONCRETE CURB RAMP

CONSTRUCTION NOTES

STRIPING (PROPOSED) - CROSSWALKS

STRIPING (PROPOSED) - LANES

INSTALL SINGLE WHITE CENTERLINE STRIPING PER CALTRANS
STANDARD A20A

INSTALL DOUBLE YELLOW (NO-PASSING) CENTERLINE STRIPING
PER CALTRANS STANDARD A20A

INSTALL MEDIAN ISLAND (NO LEFT TURN) STRIPING PER
L3
INSTALL 6" LANE LINE STRIPING PER CALTRANS STANDARD A2A (DETAIL 9/9A)
INSTALL 6" WIDE CHANNELIZING STRIPING FOR THROUGH
LANES

INSTALL RIGHT/LEFT TURN POCKET CHANNELIZING STRIPING
PER CALTRANS STANDARD A20D DETAIL 38
INSTALL "SHARK TEETH" (YIELD LINE) STRIPING PER CALTRANS L7
L8
L9
INSTALL WHITE "SHARROW" BICYCLE STRIPING PER CALTRANS
STANDARD A24C WITH SOLID GREEN BACKGROUND PAINTING

INSTALL SOLID GREEN BACKGROUND PAINTING FOR BICYCLE
PATHS.

INSTALL BICYCLE LANE SYMBOL (WITHOUT PERSON) STRIPING
PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24C

INSTALL BICYCLE LANE ARROW STRIPING PER CALTRANS
STANDARD A24A

INSTALL BIKE BOX STRIPING/PAINTING PER PLANS HEREON
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6

CONSTRUCTION (PROPOSED) - ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
E2 FURNISH & INSTALL BICYCLE LOOP DETECTOR

STRIPING (PROPOSED) - BICYCLE

SIGNAGE (PROPOSED)
FURNISH & INSTALL CITY-CUSTOM WAYFINDING SIGNAGE PER FURNISH & INSTALL CA MUTCD SIGN R10-15A (TURNING

VEHICLES YIELD TO BICYCLISTS)
FURNISH & INSTALL CA MUTCD SIGN R10-6A (STOP HERE ON
RED)

FURNISH & INSTALL GALVANIZED STEEL POST FOR SIGNAGE PER

ENGINEER'S NOTES

RESTORE EXISTING SIGN TO NEW/RELOCATED POST AS SHOWN
S6
S7
S8

MISCELLANEOUS

P PROTECT IN PLACE
INSTALL 12" WIDE LIMIT LINE STRIPING PER CALTRANS
STANDARD A24E

INSTALL DOUBLE LIMIT LINE STRIPING AT RAILROAD CROSSINGS L11

STRIPING (PROPOSED) - PARKING AND CURBS
PARALLEL PARKING STALL STRIPING ("T" FOR START/END)
PARALLEL PARKING STALL STRIPING ("CROSS" FOR MIDPOINTS) P1
P2

INSTALL RED CURB PAINTING PER LIMITS SHOWN ON PLANS

INSTALL GREEN CURB PAINTING PER LIMITS SHOWN ON PLANS

INSTALL BLUE CURB PAINTING PER LIMITS SHOWN ON PLANS
P9
P10

STRIPING (PROPOSED) - ARROWS & TEXT
INSTALL STRAIGHT ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24A
INSTALL SPEED LIMIT STRIPING PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24C

INSTALL WHITE WORD STRIPING PER CALTRANS STANDARD
A24D

INSTALL YELLOW WORD STRIPING PER CALTRANS STANDARD
A6
A7
INSTALL TURN ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24A
INSTALL COMBO (TYPE 7) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD
A2
LEGEND

SYBMOL DESCRIPTION

BICYCLE SHARROW (SHARED ROADWAY)

SIDEWALK / DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT

CURB/GUTTER REPLACEMENT

SHADE TREE

SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
EXIST. MANHOLE
EXIST. VALVE
EXIST. CATCH BASIN
EXIST. ELEC. OR TEL. VAULT
EXIST. ELEC. PULL BOX
EXIST. ELEC. CONDUIT
MH
MH
ENGINEER'S NOTES:

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES:

1.1. CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK (PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR).

1.2. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (FOR STRIPING IN FLORENCE AVE FROM ALAMEDA ST TO MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE).

1.3. CITY OF BELL (FOR STRIPING IN GAGE AVE EAST OF SALT LAKE AVE AND IN SATURN AVE EAST OF BISSEL ST).

2. PROPOSED STRIPING SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

2.1. LANE LINES, MARKERS, TEXT, ARROWS, ETC: PAINT

2.1.1. WHITE & YELLOW PAINT (TRAFFIC): STATE SPEC PTWB-01R2

2.1.2.RED, GREEN, BLUE (CURBS): FED SPEC TT-P-1952E

2.2. CROSSWALKS: THERMOPLASTIC (PTH-02SPRAY)

3. DUE TO IMAGERY AND LINEWORK SCALING, AERIAL IMAGERY MAY NOT EXACTLY MATCH DRAFTED LINEWORK. EXISTING STRIPING TO BE RE-STRIPED IN-PLACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REMOVAL OF EXISTING LANE, ARROW, AND TEXT STRIPING IS NOT REQUIRED. ONLY REMOVAL OF EXISTING INTERSECTION

STRIPING, TO MAKE WAY FOR PROPOSED CONTINENTAL CROSSWALKS AND BICYCLE BOXES, IS ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT.

4. BICYCLE SHARROWS SHALL BE SPACED EVENLY, OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 250 FEET BETWEEN SHARROWS. BICYCLE SHARROWS SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 15 FEET FROM THE BEGINNING OF INTERSECTIONS (I.E., FROM CROSSWALK LIMIT LINES), AND NO FURTHER THAN 100 FEET FROM THE BEGINNING OF INTERSECTIONS.

5. LATERAL PLACEMENT OF SHARROWS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING:

5.1. STREETS WITH ON-STREET PARKING: PLACE CENTER OF SHARROW MARKINGS 11 FEET FROM FACE OF CURB, OR FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHERE THERE IS NO CURB.

5.2. STREETS WITHOUT ON-STREET PARKING:

5.2.1. OUTSIDE TRAVEL LANE 14 FEET WIDE OR GREATER: PLACE CENTER OF SHARROWS A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET FROM FACE OF CURB, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHERE THERE IS NO CURB.

5.2.2. OUTSIDE TRAVEL LANE LESS THAN 14 FEET: PLACE CENTER OF SHARROWS ON CENTER OF TRAVEL LANE.

6. CONCRETE FOR CURB, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 520-C-2500 OR 560-C-3250. BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE (CAB), CLASS 2, CONFORMING TO CALTRANS SPECIFICATION 25-1.02B.

7. TREES FOR FLORENCE AVE (FROM SANTA FE AVE TO PACIFIC BLVD) AND FOR SANTA FE AVENUE SHALL BE GEIJERA PARVIFLORA (AUSTRALIAN WILLOW), WITH A 4'x4' TREE WELL CUT-OUT IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. TREE GRATES SHALL BE U.S. FOUNDRY MODEL 9510.

8. BUS SHELTERS FOR FLORENCE AVE AND GAGE AVE SHALL CONSIST OF STEEL SQUARE TUBES, WITH FOREST GREEN METAL PAINT, AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET 116 OF THE PLANS. BUS SHELTERS SHALL INCLUDE A 36-GAL TRASH RECEPTACLE.

9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE MATERIAL DELIVERY TICKETS TO THE CITY INSPECTOR BEFORE: INSTALLING NEW MATERIALS OR INSTALLING MATERIALS FROM A NEW SUPPLIER. CONTRACTOR MUST RECEIVE ACCEPTANCE BEFORE INSTALLATION. SUBSEQUENT DELIVERIES OF SAME MATERIALS DO NOT REQUIRE APPROVAL, BUT DELIVERY TICKETS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY INSPECTOR FOR RECORD PURPOSES.

10. A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CONDUCTED FOR THE STREETS SHOWN IN THESE PLANS. FOR

ALL EXCAVATIONS (INCLUDING CONCRETE FOR SIDEWALK DRIVEWAYS, CURB RAMPS, AND BULBOUTS), CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE PAVEMENT AND BASE SECTION THICKNESS TO MATCH EXISTING.

11. A UTILITY POTHOLING INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CONDUCTED FOR THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEETS (FOR CURB RAMPS AND BULBOUTS). DURING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE

AWARE OF THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF THE UTILITIES, AND SHALL CONDUCT HAND EXCAVATION IF NECESSARY TO AVOID SHALLOW UTILITIES.

12. FOR PORTIONS OF CONCRETE THAT ARE TO BE REPLACED, INCLUDING AT CURB RAMPS AND BULBOUTS,

EXISTING UTILITY BOXES SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE, ADJUSTED TO GRADE, OR RELOCATED WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. UTILITY BOXES DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL BE RESTORED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

13. FOR CURB AND GUTTERS MARKED FOR REPLACEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE THE FOLLOWING WHERE APPLICABLE:

13.1. RED PAINT (FOR NO PARKING SECTIONS).

13.2. ADDRESS LABELING AND WATER/SEWER SERVICE STENCILING.

14. PORTIONS OF EXISTING RED CURB LESS THAN 5 FEET IN LENGTH AT DRIVEWAY WINGS SHALL BE RESTORED IN-KIND. FOR ALL OTHER LOCATIONS (INCLUDING PORTIONS OF RED CURB FOR PARKING "T" LOCATIONS AT SALT LAKE PARK), RED CURBS SHALL BE RESTORED ONLY AS-DIRECTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH CITY PRIOR TO PERMANENT REMOVAL OF RED CURB AT PARKING "T" LOCATIONS.

15. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ARBORIST PRIOR TO TREE INSTALLATION. TREES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION.

16. PROPOSED SIGNS SHALL BE COMPRISED OF 5052 H38 GRADE ALUMINUM SHEETING, WITH 3M REFLECTIVE COATING. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL PROPOSED SIGNS TO EXISTING SIGN POSTS, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INSTALL WHITE CROSSWALK PER CALTRANS STANDARD A-24F
(CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK). WIDTH OF 8' TO 12' PER PLAN W3 A20D DETAIL 39A (FOR INTERSECTIONS)
INSTALL 5' WIDE BIKE LANE STRIPING PER CALTRANS STANDARD A20D DETAIL 39 (FOR TRAVELED LANES)
INSTALL 5' WIDE BIKE LANE STRIPING PER CALTRANS STANDARD B12 A20D DETAIL 39 (FOR TRAVELED LANES)
INSTALL 4' WIDE BIKE LANE STRIPING PER CALTRANS STANDARD A20D DETAIL 39A (FOR INTERSECTIONS) B15

REMOVE EXIST STRIPING, PAINTING, SYMBOLS, ARROWS, OR

OTHER MARKINGS AS INDICATED
R7

CITY ENGINEER
REVIEWED BY:

CHECKED

AS SHOWN
SCALE
DRAWN
DESIGN
DATE
SHT.

PREPARED BY:

NAME: PHILLIP WEST

PROJECT MANAGER
RCE No: 77453
DATE
BW
SW/JC
PW/JC
OF
&
ENGINEERING, INC. 100% SUBMITTAL (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) - 09/21/22 Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

CONTRACTOR SHALL

NOTIFY UNDERGROUND

SERVICE ALERT A
MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS

PRIOR TO BEGINNING

ANY CONSTRUCTION
WORK.

ATP CYCLE 4

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND

CONNECTIVITY PROJECT

CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHK. APPR.
123 MATCHLINE: STA 37+10 - SEE SHEET 95

GAGE AVE
SEE SHT. 60
MILES AVENUE (7
1 in = ft 20 96
0 10 20 40

GAGE AVE
SEE SHT. 60

MILES AVENUE
OF 12) MATCHLINE: STA 42+15 - SEE SHEET 97

SAMPLE OF WORK

Page 193 of 357 ends

What can our team do for you?

Page 194 of 357 ends

FEE PROPOSAL
Fee Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)
Detailed Fee Estimate
Non-Optional RFP Scope: $127,500
Optional Work: $20,000
Task PM ENG CAD SRVY QA/QC SEC
No. $150 $130 $102 $240 $130 $72 HRS. $
1 Kickoff/Scoping Meeting Including Prepration of Agenda & Minutes 4 4 2 10 $1,264 2 Data Collection, Review, and Site Investigation(s) 8 16 4 28 $3,688 3 Prepare AutoCAD Base Maps for Streets Not Requiring Survey 6 8 40 100 154 $30,020 4 Utility Company Coordination 8 16 8 32 $3,856
26 44 44 100 0 10 224 $38,828
1 Prepare & Submit 60% Design PS&E 24 80 80 10 8 202 $24,036 2 Prepare & Submit 90% Design PS&E 24 80 80 10 8 202 $24,036 3 Prepare & Submit 100% (FINAL) Design PS&E 14 12 24 10 4 64 $7,696 4 Review Meetings with City (3) 12 12 4 28 $3,648
74 184 184 0 30 24 496 $59,416
1 Preliminary SCE / Caltrans Coordination 4 12 4 20 $2,448 2 SCE / Caltrans Coordination 10 50 8 68 $8,576
14 62 0 0 0 12 88 $11,024
1 Review/Respond to RFIs, RFCs During Bidding (Estimate of 5 RFIs) 4 4 8 $1,120 2 Prepare Addenda (2) During Bidding 4 8 12 $1,640
3 Attend Pre-Construction Meeting 3 3 6 $840
4 Review/Respond to RFIs, RFCs During Const. (Estimate of 10 RFIs) 4 8 12 $1,640 5 Review Contractor's Submittals (Estimate 20 Submittals) 4 24 28 $3,720 6 Attend Construction Progress Meetings (5) 10 15 25 $3,450 7 As-Builts/Record Drawings 8 8 16 4 36 $4,160
37 70 16 0 0 4 127 $16,570
N/A $1,662
151 360 244 100 30 50 935 $127,500
Subtotal
Subtotal
Pt. 3 - PERMITTING & OUTSIDE AGENCY COORDINATION
Subtotal
Subtotal

TOTAL NON-OPTIONAL WORK
Direct Costs (printing, reproduction, shipping, mileage, etc.) Pt. 2 - FINAL ENGINEERING
TOTAL

NON-OPTIONAL WORK LISTED IN RFP
ITEM
Pt. 4 - BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Pt. 1 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
1 Field Survey & Prepare Map (AutoCAD) for Select Streets/Segments N/A $20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $20,000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $20,000

OPTIONAL WORK

TOTAL FOR SUBCONSULTANT WORK
Subtotal

ATTACHMENT D

Page 195 of 357 ends

FEE PROPOSAL
Fee Proposal for: Design Services for South El Monte Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Safety Project ATP Cycle 5 Project, ATPL-5352(023)

HOURLY RATE CHART AND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE
Key Positions
Position Hourly Rates
Project Manager $150
Engineer $130
CAD Designer (Assistant Engineer Level) $102
2-Man Survey Crew $240
Quality Assurance/Control $130
Secretary $72
Reimbursable In-House Costs
Vehicle mileage, between engineer's office
and project site and/or client offices $ 0.65/mile
Reproduction, printing, and any other services
performed by subcontractor cost + 15%
Postage Delivery Service, Express Mail cost + 15%
NOTE: All rates are effective until the end of this contract.

Page 196 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1

CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT
By and Between

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
and
WEST & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC.

ATTACHMENT E
DRAFT

Page 197 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 1

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE AND
WEST & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC.

THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 9
th day of May, 2023 by and between the CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and WEST & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC., a California Corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.

C. Pursuant to the City of South El Monte Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder.

As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest DRAFT

Page 198 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 2
professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more firstclass firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.

The Scope of Services shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Work.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer.

1.6 Care of Work.

The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

DRAFT

Page 199 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 3

1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

1.8 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed.

1.9 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed One Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($127,500.00) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8.

DRAFT

Page 200 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 4

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City.

Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.

2.4 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance.

By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall contain all information specified in Exhibit “C”, and shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories:
labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.5 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

DRAFT

Page 201 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 5
ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding two (2) years from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”).

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.

The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

DRAFT

Page 202 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 6
Phillip West Principal
(Name) (Title)
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance.

4.2 Status of Consultant.

Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights.

4.3 Contract Officer.

The Contract Officer shall be Rene Salas or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

4.4 Independent Consultant.

Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent DRAFT

Page 203 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 7
contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. Consultant represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to the City pursuant to this Agreement are classified by Consultant as employees and that Consultant issues or will issue a W-2 to such personnel.

In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, subcontractor, or independent contractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) to be classified as other than an independent contractor for the City, then Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgments, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to the City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Consultant or any of Consultant’s personnel used to provide the Services under this Agreement are other than independent contractors of the City.

4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages.

Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
(a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has DRAFT

Page 204 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 8
not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.
(b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. (c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement. (d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).
(e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”.

5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
(b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants. (c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and nonDRAFT

Page 205 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 9
contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
(d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.
(f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
(g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
(h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage.
(j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall DRAFT

Page 206 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 10
be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.
(k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. (l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. (n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation.
(o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City.
(p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.
(q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

5.3 Indemnification.

To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in DRAFT

Page 207 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 11
connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom;
(c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.

Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and DRAFT

Page 208 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 12
detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City.

6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the DRAFT

Page 209 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 13
public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.
(b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California.

7.2 Disputes; Default.

In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default.

This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the DRAFT

Page 210 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 14
alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.

7.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.

DRAFT

Page 211 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 15

7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant.

If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees.

If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

DRAFT

Page 212 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 16
No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices.

DRAFT

Page 213 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 17
Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of South El Monte, 1415 Santa Anita Ave, South El Monte, CA 91733 and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9.4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

9.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.

No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in DRAFT

Page 214 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 18
violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.

Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect.

Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______

9.7 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
DRAFT

Page 215 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, a municipal
corporation
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
Anthony R. Taylor, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:

WEST & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC.

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Address: 78 Anacapa Ct.

Foothill Ranch, CA 92610
Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S

SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE

INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

DRAFT

Page 216 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
On __________, 2023 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
gnature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER________________________
_______
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_________________________________________
____
_________________________________________
____
___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.

DRAFT

Page 217 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
gnature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

DRAFT

Page 218 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services:

1. Phase I– Preliminary Technical Services
• RFP Task 1: Project Management
• RFP Task 2: Utility Coordination/Data Collection
• RFP Task 3: Preliminary Research & Design

2. Phase II – Engineering Services
• RFP Task 4: Plans, Specifications, & Estimates

3. Phase III – Bidding, Construction, & Contract Close-Out • RFP Task 5: Bidding and Construction Support
• RFP Task 6: Prepare Record Drawings (As-Builts)
Phase I – Preliminary Technical Services
Task 1 - Preliminary Project Administration, Coordination, and Initial Research

2. Implement Quality Control methods to ensure quality of design and quality of services, including progress meetings (bi-weekly or as-needed).

3. Determine affected 3rd-party agencies (i.e. Caltrans, Edison/SCE, City of El Monte, etc.) and establish contact information and design requirements for the project.

4. Conduct additional site investigations to familiarize ourselves further with the project site.

Task 2 - Data Collection, Technical Research, and Topographic Survey

Page 219 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 A-2
experience response times are quicker when information is requested directly by the municipalities.

3. Review all applicable City-furnished as-builts and other record information specific to the project, including but not limited to as-built drawings.

4. Optional: As necessary and at the direction of the City, conduct a topographic field survey and prepare digital files in CAD (AutoCAD) for the preparation of plans. All surface features for all utilities within the surveyed area will be located, including valve covers, meter boxes, manholes, vaults, and other facilities.

Phase II – Engineering Services
Task 3 – 1st Submittal (60%) Construction Documents (PS&E)

1. Prepare 60% design plans, specifications (“specs”) and estimate of probable costs (PS&E’s) in accordance with the approved criteria as outlined in the Kickoff Meeting and as discussed with City staff.
a. The 60% Plans will be prepared using current City Standards, other agency standards where applicable, and good engineering practice. b. The 60% Specs will be prepared in accordance with City Standards and will be arranged in either the Greenbook format or another appropriate format. c. Cost estimates will be prepared using recent bids, manufacturers pricing, information from contractors, and/or cost index data published by professional sources.

2. Submit the 60% PS&E to City staff for review. The submittal will include hard copies of full size (36x24) plan sets, hard copies of the Specs, hard copies of the cost estimate, and electronic copies (PDFs) of the Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate.

3. Meet and/or coordinate with City staff to receive input on the 60% PS&E.

4. Coordinate with 3rd-party agencies for permitting and/or approval.

Task 4 – 2nd Submittal (90%) Construction Documents (PS&E)

1. Prepare 90% PS&E in accordance with the 60% PS&E comments received.

DRAFT

Page 220 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 A-3

2. Submit the 90% PS&E to City staff for review. The submittal will include hard copies of full size (36x24) plan sets, hard copies of the Specs, hard copies of the cost estimate, and electronic copies (PDFs) of the Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate.

3. Meet and/or coordinate with City staff to receive input on the 90% PS&E.

4. Coordinate with 3rd-party agencies for permitting and/or approval.

Task 5 – Final (Bid-Ready) Construction Documents

1. Prepare Final (bid-ready) design PS&E in accordance with the 90% PS&E comments received.

2. Submit the Final PS&E to City staff for their use in advertisement/bidding. The submittal will include hard copies of full size (36x24) plan sets (Signed Mylars), hard copies of the Specs (Signed Specs), hard copies of the cost estimate, and electronic copies (PDFs) of the Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate on a CD. All final documents will be signed/stamped by a Professional Engineer.

Phase III – Bidding & Construction Support
Task 6 – Bidding Phase Services

1. Attend Pre-Bid meeting.

2. Assist City staff in responding in writing to any contractor’s questions (RFI’s) during bidding. We assume that a total of five (5) RFIs will be required should the City receive more than five(5) RFI’s

3. Assist the City in the preparation of any addenda. We assume that up to two (2) addenda may be required.

Task 7 – Construction Phase Services

1. Attend Pre-Construction meeting.

2. Assist City staff in responding in writing to any contractor’s questions (RFI’s) during construction. We assume that a total of ten (10) RFIs will be required.

3. Assist City staff in reviewing shop drawings, samples, equipment specifications and other submittals. We assume that approximately twenty (20) submittal reviews for purposes of this proposal.

4. Attend construction progress meetings. We assume that a total of five (5) construction progress meetings will be required.

DRAFT

Page 221 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 A-4
Task 8 – As-Built Preparation

1. Prepare final As-Built drawings incorporating any changes that occurred during the construction.

2. Submit one (1) full size (36x24) hard copy of the as-built drawings to the Project Manager along with one (1) electronic copy on a CD. The CD will contain both PDF and AutoCAD versions of the as-built plans.

II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City:
• Baseline project schedule, and project schedule updates at 60%, 90%, 100% submittals
• Meeting agendas and meeting minutes
• Utility correspondence log and utility notification letters • Environmental documentation (CEQA)
• 60% plans (in AutoCAD Civil 3D and pdf), specifications (in Microsoft Word) and estimates (in Microsoft Excel)
• 90% plans (in AutoCAD Civil 3D and pdf), specifications (in Microsoft Word) and estimates (in Microsoft Excel)
• 100% plans (in AutoCAD Civil 3D and pdf), specifications (in Microsoft Word) and estimates (in Microsoft Excel)
• Bid Package (City will provide boiler plate)
• LAPG forms for construction allocation request
• As-built drawings in AutoCAD Civil 3D and pdf
III. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports:

A. Monthly project progress reports
IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services:

DRAFT

Page 222 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 A-5
DRAFT

Page 223 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)
The Agreement is amended as provided herein. Deleted text is indicated in strikethrough and added text in bold italics.

N/A
DRAFT

Page 224 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks at the following rates:

DRAFT

Page 225 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 C-2
II. A retention of ten percent (10%) shall be held from each payment as a contract retention to be paid as part of the final payment upon satisfactory completion of services.

Not applicable.

III. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.9.

IV. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

V. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

VI. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.

DRAFT

Page 226 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 C-3
EXHIBIT “C-1”
DRAFT

Page 227 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 D-1
EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all services timely in accordance with the following schedule:

DRAFT

Page 228 of 357 ends

01257.0001/888834.1 D-2
II. Consultant shall deliver the following tangible work products to the City by the following dates.
• Baseline project schedule on the date when the City issues Notice to Proceed (NTP) • Project schedule update at 60% PS&E submittal within 6 weeks after City’s NTP • Project schedule update at 90% PS&E submittal within 12 weeks after City’s NTP • Project schedule update at 100% PS&E submittal within 17 weeks after City’s NTP • Meeting agendas and meeting minutes at biweekly project progress meetings • Utility correspondence log and utility notification letters within 4 weeks after City’s NTP
• Environmental documentation (CEQA) within 4 weeks after City’s NTP • 60% plans (in AutoCAD Civil 3D and pdf), specifications (in Microsoft Word) and estimates (in Microsoft Excel) within 6 weeks after City’s NTP • 90% plans (in AutoCAD Civil 3D and pdf), specifications (in Microsoft Word) and estimates (in Microsoft Excel) within 12 weeks after City’s NTP • 100% plans (in AutoCAD Civil 3D and pdf), specifications (in Microsoft Word) and estimates (in Microsoft Excel) within 17 weeks after City’s NTP • Bid Package (City will provide boiler plate) within 17 weeks after City’s NTP • LAPG forms for construction allocation request within 17 weeks after City’s NTP • As-built drawings in AutoCAD Civil 3D and pdf after project construction completion (date to be determined)
III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2.

DRAFT

Page 229 of 357 ends

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.c.

DATE: May 9, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO.
23-44, APPROVING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR A
SPECIFIED GRANT FROM THE 2022-2023 BUDGET STATE
LEGISLATURE, AB178 CH.45 SECTION 233.19.56 (B) (1) (K)

GRANT FUNDS FOR THE RENOVATION OF NEW TEMPLE

PARK FACILITIES
SUMMARY: The City was allocated $200,000 in specified grant funds under the State legislature budget AB 178 Ch.45 Section 233.19.56 (b)(1)(k) Program. Funds are intended for New Temple Park facilities renovations and staff wishes to submit an application packet before grant payments can be approved.

While the City’s resolution refers to AB 178 Ch. 45 Section 233.19.56(b)(1)(k) to comply with the requirements of the Procedural Guide, the City acknowledges that the proper reference is to the 2022 Budget Act Section 19.56(a)(1)(k).

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff Recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 23- 44, approving submittal of the specified grant funds under the State legislature budget AB 178 Ch.45 Section 233.19.56 (b)(1)(k) program for New Temple Park facilities renovation project.

FISCAL/FINANCIAL IMPACT: No local match is required. No fiscal impact on the general fund budget.

DISCUSSION: The Program is administered by California State Park's Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS). The City has received an allocation of $200,000. As a next step, OGALS has requested municipalities provide a Resolution approving the application(s) as soon as possible. Applications are due by December 31, 2023.

Staff is currently preparing a grant application for specified grant funds under the State Legislature budget AB 178 Ch.45 Section 233.19.56 (b)(1)(k) program for the New Temple Park facilities renovation project.The New Temple Park renovation project will envision the design plans for a multi-purpose 1,000 to 2,000 square foot facility that includes restrooms,

Page 230 of 357 ends

snack bar, storage room and community room. The current conditions of the existing structures at New Temple Park are dilapidated, where preventative and maintenance repairs have been exhausted and a new state of the art facility is the best use of these funds. The inclusion of these specified grant funds under the State Legislature budget AB 178 Ch.45 Section 233.19.56 (b)(1)(k) program funds, in the amount of $200,000, toward this project indicates a financial commitment by the City and may strengthen the application.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 23-44

Page 231 of 357 ends

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 23-44

A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL

APPROVING APPLICATION FOR SPECIFIED GRANT FUNDS
FROM BUDGET ACT 2022/2023, SPECIFIED GRANT FROM
THE 2022/2023 BUDGET STATE LEGISLATURE, AB 178 CH.
45 SECTION 233.19.56(b)(1)(k) $200,000 TO THE CITY OF

SOUTH EL MONTE FOR THE RENOVATION OF NEW

TEMPLE PARK FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of a grant to the City of South El Monte, setting up necessary procedures governing application(s) and; WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant’s Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of project application(s) before submission of said applications to the State; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete the project(s);

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the filing of a project application for the specified project grants.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby certifies that City has or will have available, prior to commencement of the project work utilizing specified grant funds, sufficient funds, including those provided by this grant, to complete the project.

SECTION 4. The City Council hereby certifies that the City has or will provide sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s).

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby certifies that the applicant has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the Provisions contained in the contract in this Procedural Guide.

SECTION 6. The City Council hereby certifies that the City agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and guidelines.

SECTION 7. The City Council hereby delegates the authority to the City Manager, or their designee, to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to

Page 232 of 357 ends

applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the project scope(s).

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 9th day of May 2023. ________________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 23-44, was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 9th day of May, 2023 and that Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

Page 233 of 357 ends

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.d.

DATE: May 9, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO.
23-45, ADOPTING THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022-
2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (SPEED

SURVEY)
SUMMARY: The City of South El Monte staff completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (Speed Survey) for (23) street segments citywide and prepared the City of South El Monte 2022-2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey. A resolution is required to be adopted by the City Council to set and establish citywide speed limits to be upheld by the courts.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 23-45, approving the Certification of the City of South El Monte 2022-2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey for (23) street segments Citywide for the establishment of speed limits.

FISCAL/FINANCIAL IMPACT: An inventory of existing Speed Limit signs located within the studied segments, resulted in the finding that (20) speed limit signs would need to be removed and replaced due to graffiti, non-reflectivity or being faded or damaged, along the 4 segments that are recommended for a 5 MPH speed reduction. Ten (10) speed limit signs would also need to be removed and replaced with 25 MPH signs due to a reduction of speed limits. The fiscal impact of this is $4,000 to be paid out of the gas tax fund balance.

DISCUSSION: The purpose of this report is to prepare an engineering and traffic survey at pre-determined locations in the City of South El Monte to establish updated speed limits that can be enforced using radar. An engineering and traffic assessment was prepared for (23) street segments in the City of South El Monte. Applicable sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and Department of Transportation California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), as Revision 6 March 30, 2021 have been followed so that the posted speed limits can be upheld by the courts and will not constitute a "Speed Trap" as defined by CVC Section 40802. Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413.

Page 234 of 357 ends

Data was obtained regarding the prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, roadway conditions, pedestrian activities, on-street parking, and land use adjacent to the roadways. Radar speed measurements were conducted during November 2022. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data at all (23) locations were obtained from counts taken in October 2022 and November 2022. These counts were taken while school was in session. Any unusual counts were checked and redone in order to verify the amount of traffic each segment carries.

The City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey (Attachment B) segment summaries presented in the report illustrate the results of a thorough evaluation of the data collected and provide a recommended speed limit for each street segment surveyed. In each case, the recommended speed limit is consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Based on the data, it was determined that (4) of the speed limits on the studied segments will be changed and the rest of the existing speed limits will remain as existing. The segment locations with recommended changes to the existing speed limits are as follow:
• Location 1 – Central Avenue: Durfee Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue. The current posted speed for this location is listed as 30MPH, as per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, the new recommended speed limit for this location is 25MPH. • Location 17 – Thienes Avenue: Tyler Avenue to Durfee Avenue/Peck Road. The current posted speed for this location is listed as 30MPH, as per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, the new recommended speed limit for this location is 25MPH. • Location 18 – Troy Avenue: Fern Street to Rush Street. The current posted speed for this location is listed as 30MPH, as per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, the new recommended speed limit for this location is 25MPH. • Location 20 – Weaver Avenue: Santa Anita Avenue to Tyler Avenue. The current posted speed for this location is listed as 30MPH, as per CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5, the new recommended speed limit for this location is 25MPH.

The recommendations contained in the City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey were intended to establish prima facie speed limits. Prima Facie limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of the reasonable speed for a section of highway for prevailing conditions. They are not intended to be absolute. All violations of these speed limits are violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit merely suggests a safe speed under normal conditions.

Per the California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 40802), States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years. Based on the results of this study, the document may be recertified if there have not been any significant changes to the roadway conditions. Once the CAMUTCD Revision 7 and CVC Section 40802 have been formally adopted by the State in 2024, the engineering and traffic survey may be extended to 14 years, using the same prerequisites.

ATTACHMENT(S):

A. Resolution No. 23-45
B. City Wide Speed Survey DRAFT 040723

Page 235 of 357 ends

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 23-45

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CITY
OF SOUTH EL MONTE’S 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND

TRAFFIC SURVEY (SPEED SURVEY)
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Vehicle Code Section, the City completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (ETS) for 23 street segments citywide attached herein as Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the ETS is to establish updated speed limits that can be legally enforced using radar at pre-determined locations; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of the City of South El Monte's 2022/2023 ETS attached herein as (Attachment A) will allow the posted speed limit to be upheld by the courts and does not constitute a "Speed Trap" as defined by CVC Section 40802; and WHEREAS, state and local agencies should conduct ETS at least once every 5, 7, or 10 years, in compliance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 40802) to reevaluate nonstatutory speed limits on segments of their roadways; and once changes to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, herein, once the CAMUTCD Revision 7 and the CVC Section 40802, is adopted in 2024, States and local agencies may conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802; and WHEREAS, ETS can be an enforceable document for a maximum of 10 years as long as there have not been any significant changes in the roadway; and WHEREAS, approval of the City’s ETS is required to establish citywide speed limits to be upheld by the courts; and
WHEREAS, the recommended speed limits are consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements; and
WHEREAS, based on the results of the ETS, four (4) of the studied segments speed limits will be lowered by 5 mph due to existing conditions and collision rates; and WHEREAS, the recommendation contained in the ETS were intended to establish prima facie speed limits. Prima Facie limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of the reasonable speed for a section of highway for prevailing conditions.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.

Page 236 of 357 ends

Section 2. The City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey for 23 street segments Citywide for the establishment of speed limits attached herein as Attachment B is hereby approved and adopted.

Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH day of May 2023.
______________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 23-45 was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte, at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 9th day of May 2023 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk

Page 237 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
2022/2023 ENGINEERING

AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CVC SECTION 627
Adopted by South El Monte City Council
Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023
Transtech.org
855.595.2495 (toll-free)
ISO 9001 Certified
Submitted By:

TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC.

Contact Person for this Proposal:

Jana Robbins, PTP, RSP
E: [email protected]
Submitted To:

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE

ATTACHMENT B

Page 238 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page ii of v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE
Cover Page i
Table of Contents ii
South El Monte City Council Adopted Resolution No. XX (Adopted XX, 2023) iii Preparer’s Certification (Engineer’s Stamp and Signature) iv Section 1: Introduction
✓ Table 1: List of Segments in Speed Survey
1 Section 2: Overview 3
✓ California Vehicle Code 3
✓ Local Authority to Establish Prima Facie Speed Limits 4 ✓ Speed Trap 4
✓ Engineering and Traffic Survey 5
✓ California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 6 ✓ Data Collection 7
✓ Procedures 8
Section 3: Summary of Recommendations 10
✓ Table 2: City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary 11 ✓ Table 3: Summary Condition of Speed Limit Signs 14
Section 4: City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Citywide Speed Limit Map and Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Map 18
✓ City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Citywide Speed Limit Map 19 ✓ City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Citywide Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Map 20 Section 5: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Forms 21 Section 6: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts 68

Page 239 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page iii of v
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE’S 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (SPEED SURVEY) WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Vehicle Code Section, the City completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (ETS) for 23 street segments citywide attached herein as Attachment A; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the ETS is to establish updated speed limits that can be legally enforced using radar at pre-determined locations; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of the City of South El Monte's 2022/2023 ETS attached herein as (Attachment A) will allow the posted speed limit to be upheld by the courts and does not constitute a "Speed Trap" as defined by CVC Section 40802; and
WHEREAS, state and local agencies should conduct ETS at least once every 5, 7, or 10 years, in compliance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 40802) to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways; and once changes to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, herein, CAMUTCD Revision 7 and the CVC Section 40802, is adopted in 2024, States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802.

WHEREAS, ETS can be an enforceable document for a maximum of 10 years as long as there have not been any significant changes in the roadway; and
WHEREAS, approval of the City’s ETS is required to establish citywide speed limits to be upheld by the courts; and
WHEREAS, the recommended speed limits are consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements.

WHEREAS, based on the results of the ETS, four (4) of the studied segments speed limits will be lowered by 5 mph due to existing conditions and collision rates; and WHEREAS, the recommendation contained in the ETS were intended to establish prima facie speed limits. Prima Facie limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of the reasonable speed for a section of highway for prevailing conditions;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.

Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS XX day of XX 2023.

Page 240 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page iv of v
PREPARER’S CERTIFICATION

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CVC SECTION 627
EFFECTIVE DATE: XX, 2023
ADOPTED BY SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XX ON XX, 2023 This report was prepared under the supervisions of:

Bahman Janka, PE

CERTIFICATION BY ENGINEER
_
__________________________
Bahman Janka, PE
License Type: Traffic
License Number: 1520

CERTIFICATION BY ENGINEER
I, Bahman Janka, contracted Traffic Engineering, do hereby certify that the March 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of South El Monte was performed under my supervision.

I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional Engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing on City of South El Monte Streets.

Page 241 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 1 of 113
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to prepare an Engineering and Traffic Survey at pre-determined locations in the City of South El Monte to establish updated speed limits that can be enforced using radar. An Engineering and Traffic assessment was prepared for 23 street segments in the City of South El Monte. Applicable sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and Department of Transportation California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), as Revision 6 March 30, 2021, have been followed so that the posted speed limits can be upheld by the courts and do not constitute a "Speed Trap" as defined by CVC Section 40802. The following table lists all of the street segments considered in the 2022/2023 City-Wide Speed Survey.

SEGMENT SUMMARY
Table 1
List of Segments
No. Street Segment

1. Central Avenue Durfee Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue

2. Central Avenue Santa Anita Avenue to Fern Street

3. Chico Avenue Garvey Avenue to South City Limit

4. Durfee Avenue/Peck Road North City Limit to South City Limit

5. Durfee Avenue Peck Road to West City Limit

6. Garvey Avenue West City Limit to Potrero Avenue

7. Klingerman Street Santa Anita Avenue to Central Avenue

8. Lee Avenue Garvey Avenue to Rush Street

9. Loma Avenue Mabel Avenue to Rush Street

10. Merced Avenue Rush Street to Santa Anita Avenue

11. Michael Hunt Drive Durfee Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue

12. Peck Road North City Limit to Durfee Avenue

13. Potrero Avenue Kale Street to South City Limit

14. Rush Street Loma Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard

15. Rush Street Rosemead Boulevard to Santa Anita Avenue

16. Santa Anita Avenue Fern Street to Tyler Avenue

17. Thienes Avenue Tyler Avenue to Durfee Avenue/Peck Road

18. Troy Avenue Fern Street to Rush Street

19. Tyler Avenue Klingerman Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue

20. Weaver Avenue Santa Anita Avenue to Tyler Avenue

21. Merced Avenue Rush Street to Fern Street

22. Santa Anita Avenue Tyler Avenue to Pomona Freeway

23. Rush Street Santa Anita Avenue to Peck Road
Each of these segments are classified and defined with roadway classifications as listed in the California Road Systems (CRS) Maps that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation (CVC 40802). Functional classifications are used in determining which type of roads are eligible for Federal funding to maintain the roads.

Usually Principal Arterials, Minor Arterial and Major Collectors are eligible.

Page 242 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 2 of 113
Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. Basic to this process is the recognition that individual roads and streets do not serve travel independently in any major way. Rather, most travel involves movement through a network of roads. Functional classification defines how a particular road or street plays in serving the flow of trips through a highway network.

The four functional systems for urbanized areas are urban principal arterials, minor arterials, major collectors, and local roads.

Principal Arterials: Major Arterials carry most of the trips entering and leaving the City as well as serves the major centers of activity of a City, carries the highest traffic volume along its corridors while carrying the major portion of trips entering and leaving the urban area.

Minor Arterials: The minor arterial street system includes all arterials not classified as principal and contains facilities that place more emphasis on land access than the higher system and offer a lower level of traffic mobility. Such facilities may carry local bus routes and provide intracommunity continuity, but ideally should not penetrate identifiable neighborhoods. This system should include urban connections to rural collector roads where such connections have not been classified as urban principal arterials.

Major Collectors: The collector street system provides both land access service and traffic circulation within residential neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas. It differs from the arterial system in that facilities on the collector system may penetrate residential neighborhoods, distributing trips from the arterials through the area to the ultimate destination. Conversely, the collector street also collects traffic from local streets in residential neighborhoods and channels it into the arterial system.

Local Roads: These roadways provide direct access to individual residential properties, schools, and churches typically with a posted speed of 25 MPH. Through traffic on local streets are usually discouraged. Local roads within residential and business district zones are not subject to Speed Trap provisions and are posted at the Prima Facie speed limit. Service to through traffic movement is usually deliberately discouraged.

The following segments have been categorized and classified as follows by the City of South El Monte.

Principal Arterials:
• Durfee Avenue/Peck Road between North City Limit and South City Limit • Durfee Avenue between Peck Road and West City Limit
• Peck Road between North City Limit and Durfee Avenue
Minor Arterials:
• Central Avenue between Santa Anita Avenue and Fern Street • Garvey Avenue between West City Limit and Potrero Avenue • Merced Avenue between Rush Street and Santa Anita Avenue • Potrero Avenue between Kale Street and South City Limit • Rush Street between Loma Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard

Page 243 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 3 of 113
• Rush Street between Rosemead Boulevard and Santa Anita Avenue • Tyler Avenue between Klingerman Street and Santa Anita Avenue • Merced Avenue between Rush Street and Fern Street
• Santa Anita Avenue between Tyler Avenue and Pomona Freeway • Rush Street between Santa Anita Avenue and Peck Road
Major Collectors:
• Chico Avenue between Garvey Avenue and South City Limit • Lee Avenue between Garvey Avenue and Mabel Avenue
• Loma Avenue between Mabel Avenue and Rush Street
• Michael Hunt Drive between Durfee Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue • Santa Anita Avenue between Fern Street and Tyler Avenue Local Roads:
• Central Avenue between Durfee Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue • Klingerman Street between Santa Anita Avenue and Central Avenue • Lee Avenue between Mabel Avenue to Rush Street
• Thienes Avenue between Tyler Avenue and Durfee Avenue/Peck Road • Troy Avenue between Fern Street and Rush Street
• Weaver Avenue between Santa Anita Avenue and Tyler Avenue SECTION 2: OVERVIEW
CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE:

Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413. The statutes establish or provide means of establishing speed limits by:

1. Basic speed limit law.

Section 22350 of the CVC provides that no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, traffic and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. This is the basic speed limit law.

2. Prima facie speed limits are specified by statute or established by the State or local authorities within their respective jurisdictions on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. Prima facie speed limits are specific limits stated in the CVC or specific limits established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey authorized by the CVC. Prima facie speed limits are preempted by the basic speed limit law when the conditions in CVC Section 22350 are met.

Section 22352 of the CVC establishes prima facie speed limits as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in the CVC and if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice of the change:
a. Fifteen miles per hour.
• At a railroad grade crossing with an obstructed view.

Page 244 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 4 of 113
• At an uncontrolled highway intersection with an obstructed view. • In an alley.
b. Twenty-five miles per hour.
• On any highway other than a State highway, in any business or residence district, CVC Sections 235 and 515 define a "business district” and a “residence district” respectively.

Section 240 of CVC prescribes a method for determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district.
• Unless a different limit is established by procedures described elsewhere in the code. • In a school zone, posted with SCHOOL warning signs.
• When passing a facility primarily used by senior citizens and contiguous to a street other than a State highway and posted with a SENIOR warning sign.

Increase of local speed limits to 65 miles per hour
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 mph, local authorities may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 mph or a maximum speed of 65mph, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The speed limit shall become effective when signs are installed on the street and not revised unless justified on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.

LOCAL AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS:

Sections 22357 and 22358 of CVC authorize local authorities to establish prima facie speed limits on streets and roads under their jurisdiction on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. The declared prima Facie limits shall become effective when appropriate signs giving notice are erected upon the street.

SPEED TRAP:

Section 40802 2B(i) of the CVC provides that prima facie speed limits established under Sections 22352, 22354, 22357, 22358 and 22358.3 may not be enforced by radar unless the speed limit has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods; five years to the date of the violation, within the last 7 years or if an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than 7 years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, the survey applies for 10 years.

Once the CAMUTCD Revision 7 and CVC Section 40802 has been formally adopted by the State, projected in 2024, the engineering and traffic survey may be extended to 14 years, using the same prerequisites.

Page 245 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 5 of 113
This section does not apply to local streets, roads or school zones which have been set at the Prima Facie speed limit. Local streets are defined to have the following characteristics:
• Width not more than 40 feet
• Not more than .5 miles of uninterrupted length
• 1 lane in each direction
CVC Section 515. A residence district is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

Those segments classified as a local street in the California Road System and are in a residential district have a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph and are not typically included in engineering and traffic studies.

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY:

Section 627 of CVC defines the term engineering and traffic survey and lists its requirements.

Section 627 states: "An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the Department of Transportation, consideration of all of the following:
prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; accident records; highway traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver." The Engineering and Traffic Survey should contain sufficient information to document that the conditions of CVC Section 627 have been complied with and that other conditions not readily apparent to motorists are properly identified.

In determining the speed limit, which most appropriately facilitates the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and prudent, crucial factors such as prevailing speeds, unexpected conditions, and collision records are examined.

Determination of posted speed limits follow the latest CAMUTCD Policy as Revision 6 March 30, 2021 by the State of California Department of Transportation. Speed limits shall be rounded to the nearest (5 MPH) increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment, but then the Department of Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the speed limit any further for any reason CVC 21400(4)(b).

An example of the application of this speed limit criteria is as follows:
• If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey is (37 MPH) then the speed limit would be posted at 35 MPH or optionally reduced to 30 MPH. However,

Page 246 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 6 of 113
• If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey is (38 MPH) then the speed limit would be posted at 40 MPH or optionally reduced to 35 MPH.

The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed. Pace speed is defined as the 10-mile increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals.

Basic speed law states that no person shall drive at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent.

The majority of drivers comply with this law. Speed limits set at the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a means of controlling drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified.

CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CAMUTCD):

Section 2B.13 CAMUTCD: Reduction of 85th Percentile Speed by Justification of an Engineering and Traffic Study and Approved by a Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Standard:
12a: When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the Option below.

Option:

The posted speed may be reduced by 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85thpercentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for documentation requirements.

Standard:
12b: If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 MPH reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358-22358.5.

Support:
12c: The following example is provided to explain the application of this speed limit criteria:

A. If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 MPH, then the speed limit would be established at 35 MPH since it is the closest 5 MPH increment to the 37 MPH speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 MPH established speed limit could be reduced by 5 MPH to 30 MPH if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Page 247 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 7 of 113
The fundamentals used to establish speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner but need to be advised of conditions which may not be readily apparent. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must be analyzed along with speed measurements to determine speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually coordinated with visible changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments.

In general, speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is considered a violator for enforcement purposes.

DATA COLLECTION:

Highway, traffic, and roadside land uses were analyzed for conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The criteria and procedures described below were applied when using the electronic radar to measure vehicle speeds on selected streets within the City of South El Monte. Traffic volume and speed in both directions were recorded.

The hours of radar operation were restricted to off-peak period for heavily traveled streets, and to non-congested peak periods on lightly traveled streets on a weekday. The radar measurements were taken from an unmarked vehicle so as not to alter or impede the free flow of traffic.

A total of 100 samples were obtained for each street segment surveyed, where possible. In no case were sample sizes less than 50 vehicles for each direction. For lower volume streets, samples of free-flowing speeds were taken over several periods/days in order to gather the required survey samples.

Collision data was obtained from the computerized accident records system maintained by the State of California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). For purposes of this study, information available for the most recent 3.0 year period was used to develop the collision statistics as a part of the Engineering and Traffic Surveys. Collision data was obtained for the years of August of 2019, 2020, 2021 to August 2022.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data at all (23) locations were obtained from counts taken by a private traffic counting firm in October 2022, and November 2022. These counts were taken while school was in session. Any unusual counts were checked and redone in order to verify the amount of traffic each segment carries. The ADT counts were taken by NDS Services.

National Data & Surveying Services
8370 Wilshire Blvd. Ste, 205
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Tel (323) 782-0090
www.ndsdata.com

Page 248 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 8 of 113
PROCEDURES:

The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements was a SCOUT-MPH Traffic Radar, SHD04287 serial number, manufactured by Decatur. The unit was calibrated before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.

The results of the radar speed measurements were computed, analyzed, and summarized on standard Traffic Survey Forms. Significant values obtained from computations are as follows:
• The Critical Speed or 85th percentile speed, is that speed at which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. The Critical Speed is the primary guide in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the Critical Speed are not considered reasonable and safe. The accepted practice is to set the speed limit at the nearest 5 MPH increment to the Critical Speed or 85th percentile speed unless other factors require a lower limit.
• The 5 or 10 MPH pace is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the survey sample and is that 5 or 10 MPH increment containing the highest percentage of speeds in the total sample. The accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 MPH pace after considering the Critical Speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the Critical Speed.

The collision data for each street segment was compared to collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways of the same characteristics. These anticipated collision rates have been developed by Caltrans and are applicable for use in the City of South El Monte. The collision rates used for this study are as follows:

Current collision rates are shown in terms of “accidents per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel” for each segment. The rate was calculated for each segment using the following formula:

CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAYS
STATEWIDE TRAVEL AND COLLISION RATES*
URBAN (Inside City)
2 and 3 lanes
4 or more undivided
4 or more divided

EXPECTED COLLISION RATES

0.91 0.87

0.93 *Source: 2020 Collision Data on California State Highways published by State of California, Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation, Division of Traffic Operations

Page 249 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 9 of 113
The Crossroads Software Collision Program calculated the collision rate for each segment.

As previously indicated, speed limits are usually set at or near the Critical Speed unless there are other factors not readily apparent to a reasonable motorist which may justify a lower limit. The field review of the selected street segments in the City of South El Monte considered the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment.

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics.

3. Number of lanes, and other channelization and striping patterns.

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking.

5. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices.

6. Visibility obstructions.

7. Land use and the proximity of schools.

8. Uniformity with existing speed zones in adjacent jurisdictions.

9. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.

10. Location of any uncontrolled Crosswalks.

11. Bike lanes, bike routes.

COLLISION RATE = (N x 5,280 x 1,000,000)/ (ADT x L x Y x 365) N: number of collisions within the study segment
ADT: average daily traffic volume
L: length of segment in feet
Y: number of years of accident history

Page 250 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 10 of 113 SECTION 3: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Engineering and Traffic Survey summaries presented in this report illustrate the results of a thorough evaluation of the data collected and provides a recommended speed limit for each street segment surveyed. In each case, the recommended speed limit is consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code, has made it clear that it is their intent that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. The basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

The recommendations contained in this report were intended to establish prima facie speed limits.

Prima Facie limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of the reasonable speed for a section of highway for prevailing conditions. They are not intended to be absolute. All violations of these speed limits are violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle as a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit merely suggests a safe speed under normal conditions.

Out of the above 23 segments surveyed, based on the 2022 Engineering and Radar Speed survey results, it was determined that four (4) of the speed limits on the studied segments are proposed to be changed.

The following Table 2 provides a summary of each of the segments included in the engineering and traffic survey indicating the existing posted speed limit, ADT, number of collisions, collision rates, 85th percentile speed, change in limit and proposed 2022/2023 speed limit.

Table 3 provides a summary of existing speed limit signs within the City of South El Monte and the condition of each sign. This was provided so that the City could upgrade or replace any signs that have been graffitied or are bent or have an obstructed view of the existing speed signage.

Page 251 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 11 of 113 Table 2 City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023 ID Primary
Location
Limits
Street Class.
(A)
Posted
Speed
2022
ADT
No.
of
Acc.
in

3.0/yr
per.

Collision
Rate
Expected
Collision
Rate
85%
Speed
10 MPH
Pace
Limit
Per
85% Change
in Limit?
Yes/No
Adopted
2022/2023
Speed
Limit
Beginning Ending
1 Central
Avenue
Durfee
Avenue
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Local 30 1682 2 2.296 0.91 31.2 24-
33 30 Yes 253
2 Central
Avenue
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Fern Street
Minor Arterial 30 3476 21 5.108 0.91 33 25-
34 35 No 301
3 Chico
Avenue
Garvey
Avenue
South City
Limit Major Collector 30 4772 10 1.537 0.91 31.9 24-
33 30 No 30
4 Durfee
Avenue/Peck
Road
North City
Limit
South City
Limit Principal
Arterial 40 29357 39 1.682 0.93 42.2 34-43 40 No 40
5 Durfee
Avenue
Peck Road West City
Limit
Principal
Arterial 40 10340 10 1.244 0.87 46.7 39-48 40 No 402
6 Garvey
Avenue
West City
Limit
Potrero
Avenue Minor Arterial 35 27228 67 3.499 0.87 38.2 30-
39 40 No 351
7 Klingerman
Street
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Central
Avenue Local 25 1291 13 34.586 0.91 31.9 24-
33 25 No 253
8 Lee Avenue Garvey
Avenue
Rush
Street
Major
Collector/Local 30 1431 13 10.804 0.91 30.9 23-32 30 No 30 9 Loma
Avenue
Mabel
Avenue
Rush
Street Major Collector 30 1404 3 2.741 0.91 32.4 24-
33 30 No 30
10 Merced
Avenue
Rush Street Santa
Anita
Avenue
Minor Arterial 35 5898 12 2.351 0.87 37.8 31-
40 40 No 351

Page 252 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 12 of 113 Table 2 City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023 ID Primary
Location
Limits
Street Class.
(A)
Posted
Speed
2022
ADT
No.
of
Acc.
in

3.0/yr
per.

Collision
Rate
Expected
Collision
Rate
85%
Speed
10 MPH
Pace
Limit
Per
85% Change
in Limit?
Yes/No
Adopted
2022/2023
Speed
Limit
Beginning Ending
11 Michael Hunt
Drive
Durfee
Avenue
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Major Collector 30 5885 9 2.396 0.91 32.9 25-
34 35 No 301
12 Peck Road North City
Limit
Durfee
Avenue
Principal
Arterial 40 36043 20 1.436 0.93 41.9 34-43 40 No 40
13 Potrero
Avenue
Kale Street South City
Limit Minor Arterial 30 3787 21 6.132 0.91 32.5 24-
33 30 No 30
14 Rush Street Loma
Avenue
Rosemead
Blvd Minor Arterial 30 2425 5 7.24 0.91 30.8 23-
32 30 No 30
15 Rush Street Rosemead
Boulevard
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Minor Arterial 35 11500 49 3.047 0.87 39.8 32-
41 40 No 351
16 Santa Anita
Avenue
Fern Street Tyler
Avenue Major Collector 40 13779 42 3.531 0.93 41.4 33-
42 40 No 40
17 Thienes
Avenue
Tyler
Avenue
Durfee
Avenue/
Peck
Road
Local 30 3263 12 5.757 0.91 31.9 24-
33 30 Yes 253
18 Troy Avenue Fern Street Rush
Street Local 30 879 4 8.122 0.91 30.9 22-
31 30 Yes 253
19 Tyler Avenue Klingerman
Street
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Minor Arterial 35 11495 18 1.89 0.87 39.9 32-
41 40 No 351
20 Weaver
Avenue
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Tyler
Avenue Local 30 1151 18 35.203 0.91 32 24-
33 30 Yes 253

Page 253 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 13 of 113 Table 2 City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023 ID Primary
Location
Limits
Street Class.
(A)
Posted
Speed
2022
ADT
No.
of
Acc.
in

3.0/yr
per.

Collision
Rate
Expected
Collision
Rate
85%
Speed
10 MPH
Pace
Limit
Per
85% Change
in Limit?
Yes/No
Adopted
2022/2023
Speed
Limit
Beginning Ending
21 Merced
Avenue
Rush Street Fern Street Minor Arterial 35 5976 10 2.022 0.87 36.8 29- 38 35 No 35
22 Santa Anita
Avenue
Tyler
Avenue
Pomona
Freeway Minor Arterial 40 18037 31 1.989 0.87 41.7 34-
43 40 No 40
23 Rush Street Santa
Anita
Avenue
Peck
Road Minor Arterial 35 8115 34 4.601 0.87 39.9 32-
41 40 No 351
(A): Street Classifications taken from the California Road Systems Map – FHA and Caltrans Reason for Reducing Speed from 85th% (Shown in Recommendations):
1 CVC 21400 (b) allows a 5 MPH Reduction in 85th% speed by 5 MPH for Rounding Down to Nearest Posted Limit. 2 CVC 627, 22358.5 and CAMUTCD 2B.13 allows the posted speed to be reduced by 5 MPH due to road conditions, land use. 3 CVC 627, 22358.5 posted speed may be set 5 MPH lower than 85th% based on a higher than expected collision rate, land use and roadway conditions.

Page 254 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 14 of 113 Table 3
Summary Condition of Speed Limit Signs
ID Primary
Location
Limits Street
Class.

Posted
Speed Summary Conditions of Speed Limit Signs Beginning Ending 1 Central
Avenue
Durfee
Avenue
Santa Anita
Avenue
Local
30 Existing speed limit signs will be changed to 25 mph.

Remove and replace with 25 MPH sign the 30 MPH Speed Sign located 40 Feet South of Leafdale Avenue, 100 Feet North of Durfee Avenue:

Good Condition
2 Central
Avenue
Santa Anita
Avenue
Fern Street Minor
Arterial
30 30 MPH Speed Signs are located 200 Feet South of Fern Street, 25 Feet North of Klingerman Avenue, 25 Feet South of Klingerman Avenue:

Good Condition
Remove and Replace Tilted 30 MPH Speed Sign located 25 Feet North of Rush Street.
30 MPH Speed Sign is located 25 Feet South of Rush Street, 15 Feet North of Lerma Road, 15 Feet North of Vacco Street: Good Condition 3 Chico Avenue Garvey
Avenue
South City
Limit
Major
Collector
30 30 MPH Speed Signs are located 150 Feet South of Garvey Avenue, 150 Feet North of Fern Avenue, 200 Feet South of Giovane Street: Good Condition
30 MPH Speed Sign is located 25 Feet North of Rush Street, remove and replace tilted 30 MPH sign 25 Feet South of Rush Street 4 Durfee
Avenue/Peck
Road
North City
Limit
South City
Limit
Principal
Arterial 40
40 MPH Speed Signs are located 250 Feet North of Durfee Avenue, 500 Feet North of 60-West Ramp, 150 Feet South of Thienes Avenue, and 150 Feet North of Thienes Avenue: Good Condition
5 Durfee
Avenue
Peck Road West City
Limit
Principal
Arterial 40 40 MPH Speed Signs are located 2,500 Feet West of Peck Road, 1,000 Feet East of Peck Road: Good Condition 6 Garvey
Avenue
West City
Limit
Potrero
Avenue
Minor
Arterial
35 35 MPH Speed Signs are located 75 Feet West of Rosemead Boulevard, 100 Feet East of Rosemead Boulevard, 400 Feet West of Chico Avenue, 40 Feet West of Potrero Avenue: Good Condition
Remove and Replace Warped 35 MPH Speed Sign located 25 Feet East of Lee Avenue
7 Klingerman
Street
Santa Anita
Avenue
Central
Avenue
Local 25 25 MPH Speed Signs are located 30 Feet West of Santa Anita Avenue:

Good Condition

Page 255 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 15 of 113 Table 3
Summary Condition of Speed Limit Signs
ID Primary
Location
Limits Street
Class.

Posted
Speed Summary Conditions of Speed Limit Signs Beginning Ending 25 MPH Speed Signs are located 30 Feet East of Central Avenue: Good Condition
8 Lee Avenue Garvey
Avenue
Rush Street Major
Collector 30
30 MPH Speed Signs are located 10 Feet South of Mabel Avenue, 25 Feet South of Fern Avenue, 100 Feet South of Klingerman Avenue, 25 Feet North of Rush Street: Good Condition
9 Loma Avenue Mabel
Avenue
Rush Street Major
Collector 30
30 MPH Speed Signs are located 400 Feet north of Klingerman Avenue, 25 Feet North of Klingerman Avenue, 25 Feet North of Fern Avenue, 50 Feet South of Fern Street: Good Condition
10 Merced
Avenue
Rush Street Santa Anita
Avenue
Minor
Arterial
35 35 MPH Speed Signs are located 35 Feet South of Rush Avenue, 100 Feet South of Alesia Street, 300 Feet North of Lerma Road, 80 Feet North of Santa Anita Avenue: Good Condition
11 Michael Hunt
Drive
Durfee
Avenue
Santa Anita
Avenue
Major
Collector
30 30 MPH Speed Signs are located 40 Feet North of Durfee Avenue, 80 Feet North of Cogswell Ave: Good Condition
30MPH Speed Sign located 30 Feet South of Santa Anita Avenue: Good Condition
12 Peck Road North City
Limit
Durfee
Avenue
Principal
Arterial 40 40 MPH Speed Signs are located 150 Feet South of Thienes Avenue, and 150 Feet North of Thienes Avenue: Good Condition 13 Potrero
Avenue
Kale Street South City
Limit
Minor
Arterial 30
30 MPH Speed Signs are located 100 Feet North of Rush Avenue, 80 Feet South of Rush Avenue, 20 Feet North of Max Sharpiro Road, 50 Feet South of Alesia Street, 450 Feet North of Alpaca Street: Good Condition 14 Rush Street Loma
Avenue
Rosemead
Blvd
Minor
Arterial 30 30 MPH Speed Signs are located 30 Feet East of Lee Ave and 20 Feet West of Rosemead Boulevard; Good Condition 15 Rush Street Rosemead
Boulevard
Santa Anita
Avenue
Minor
Arterial
35 Remove and Replace Faded 35 MPH Speed Sign located 80 Feet East of Rosemead Boulevard
35 MPH Speed Signs are located 30 Feet West of Chico Avenue, 100 Feet West of Potrero Avenue, 40 Feet West of Merced Avenue, 100 Feet

Page 256 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 16 of 113 Table 3
Summary Condition of Speed Limit Signs
ID Primary
Location
Limits Street
Class.

Posted
Speed Summary Conditions of Speed Limit Signs Beginning Ending East of Strozier Avenue, 100 Feet West of Central Avenue, 200 Feet East of Central Avenue: Good Condition
Remove and Replace 35 MPH Speed Sign located 300 Feet Westbound of Santa Anita Avenue
16 Santa Anita
Avenue
Fern Street Tyler
Avenue
Minor
Arterial 40
40 MPH Speed Signs are located 30 Feet North of Fern Street, 80 Feet South of Fern Street, and 20 Feet South of Klingerman Street; Good Condition
17 Thienes
Avenue
Tyler
Avenue
Durfee
Avenue/
Peck Road
Local
30 Existing speed limit signs will be changed to 25 mph. Remove and replace all 30 MPH signs in segment with 25 MPH signs.

Remove and Replace with 25 MPH signs: 30 MPH Speed Sign is located 100 Feet Northbound of Durfee Avenue, 100 Feet Southbound of Tyler Avenue: Good Condition
18 Troy Avenue Fern Street Rush Street Local
30 Existing speed limit signs will be changed to 25 mph. Remove and replace all 30 MPH signs in segment with 25 MPH signs.

Remove and Replace with 25 MPH signs: 30 MPH Speed Sign is located 100 Feet North of Rush Avenue, 80 Feet South of Klingerman Avenue, 10 Feet South of Fern Avenue: Good Condition
Remove and Replace with 25 MPH signs the tilted 30 MPH Speed Sign located 5 Feet North of Klingerman Avenue
19 Tyler Avenue Klingerman
Street
Santa Anita
Avenue
Minor
Arterial 35
35 MPH Speed Signs are located 100 Feet South of Klingerman Avenue, 70 Feet North of Rush Street, 175 Feet South of Rush Street: Good Condition
20 Weaver
Avenue
Santa Anita
Avenue
Tyler
Avenue
Local
30 Existing speed limit signs will be changed to 25 mph. Remove and replace all 30 MPH signs in segment with 25 MPH signs.

Remove and Replace with 25 MPH 30 MPH Speed Sign is located 100 Feet West of Tyler Avenue, 100 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue: Good Condition

Page 257 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 17 of 113 Table 3
Summary Condition of Speed Limit Signs
ID Primary
Location
Limits Street
Class.

Posted
Speed Summary Conditions of Speed Limit Signs Beginning Ending 21 Merced
Avenue
Rush Street Fern Street Minor
Arterial
35 35 MPH Speed Signs are located 100 Feet North of Rush Street, 70 Feet South of Klingerman Avenue, 100 Feet North of Klingerman Avenue:

Good Condition
35 MPH Speed Sign is located 60 Feet South of Fern Avenue: Check tilted pole
22 Santa Anita
Avenue
Tyler
Avenue
Pomona
Freeway
Minor
Arterial 40 40 MPH Speed Signs are located 50 Feet South of Santa Anita Avenue, 250 Feet North of Central Avenue: Good Condition 23 Rush Street Santa Anita
Avenue
Peck Road Minor
Arterial 35
35 MPH Speed Signs are located 120 Feet East of Santa Anita Avenue, 85 Feet East of Tyler Avenue, 170 Feet West of Peck Road : Good Condition

Page 258 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 18 of 113 SECTION 4: CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022 CITYWIDE SPEED LIMIT MAP AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) MAP
The following pages consist of:
• City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Citywide Speed Limit Map • City of South El Monte 2022/2023 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Map.

Page 259 of 357 ends

Page 260 of 357 ends

Page 261 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 21 of 113 SECTION 5: ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY SUMMARY FORMS The following pages consist of the Engineering and Traffic Survey Grid and Summary Forms for each segment included in the Citywide Survey.

Page 262 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 22 of 113

Page 263 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 23 of 113

Page 264 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 24 of 113

Page 265 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 25 of 113

Page 266 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 26 of 113

Page 267 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 27 of 113

Page 268 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 28 of 113

Page 269 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 29 of 113

Page 270 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 30 of 113

Page 271 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 31 of 113

Page 272 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 32 of 113

Page 273 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 33 of 113

Page 274 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 34 of 113

Page 275 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 35 of 113

Page 276 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 36 of 113

Page 277 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 37 of 113

Page 278 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 38 of 113

Page 279 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 39 of 113

Page 280 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 40 of 113

Page 281 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 41 of 113

Page 282 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 42 of 113

Page 283 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 43 of 113

Page 284 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 44 of 113

Page 285 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 45 of 113

Page 286 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 46 of 113

Page 287 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 47 of 113

Page 288 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 48 of 113

Page 289 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 49 of 113

Page 290 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 50 of 113

Page 291 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 51 of 113

Page 292 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 52 of 113

Page 293 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 53 of 113

Page 294 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 54 of 113

Page 295 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 55 of 113

Page 296 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 56 of 113

Page 297 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 57 of 113

Page 298 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 58 of 113

Page 299 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 59 of 113

Page 300 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 60 of 113

Page 301 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 61 of 113

Page 302 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 62 of 113

Page 303 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 63 of 113

Page 304 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 64 of 113

Page 305 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 65 of 113

Page 306 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 66 of 113

Page 307 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 67 of 113

Page 308 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 68 of 113 SECTION 6: AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) COUNTS
The following pages consist of the ADT count sheets for all segments.

The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data was obtained from counts taken by a private traffic counting firm in October and November 2022. These counts were taken while school was in session.

ADT counts were taken by NDS Services.

National Data & Surveying Services
8370 Wilshire Blvd. Ste, 205
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Tel (323) 782-0090
Fax (323)375-1666
www.ndsdata.com

Page 309 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 69 of 113

Page 310 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 70 of 113

Page 311 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 71 of 113

Page 312 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 72 of 113

Page 313 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 73 of 113

Page 314 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 74 of 113

Page 315 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 75 of 113

Page 316 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 76 of 113

Page 317 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 77 of 113

Page 318 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 78 of 113

Page 319 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 79 of 113

Page 320 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 80 of 113

Page 321 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 81 of 113

Page 322 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 82 of 113

Page 323 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 83 of 113

Page 324 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 84 of 113

Page 325 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 85 of 113

Page 326 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 86 of 113

Page 327 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 87 of 113

Page 328 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 88 of 113

Page 329 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 89 of 113

Page 330 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 90 of 113

Page 331 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 91 of 113

Page 332 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 92 of 113

Page 333 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 93 of 113

Page 334 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 94 of 113

Page 335 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 95 of 113

Page 336 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 96 of 113

Page 337 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 97 of 113

Page 338 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 98 of 113

Page 339 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 99 of 113

Page 340 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 100 of 113

Page 341 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 101 of 113

Page 342 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 102 of 113

Page 343 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 103 of 113

Page 344 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 104 of 113

Page 345 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 105 of 113

Page 346 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 106 of 113

Page 347 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 107 of 113

Page 348 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 108 of 113

Page 349 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 109 of 113

Page 350 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 110 of 113

Page 351 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 111 of 113

Page 352 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 112 of 113

Page 353 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 113 of 113

Page 354 of 357 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE 2022/2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Adopted by South El Monte City Council Resolution No. XX on XX, 2023

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 114 of 113

Page 355 of 357 ends

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 12.a.

DATE: May 9, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Dianna Gomez, Executive Assistant
SUBJECT: COUNCILMEMBER HECTOR DELGADO

1. Discussion on Funding the /Dedicated Los Angeles Sheriffs' Department (LASD) Sergeant Position.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion and/or Action.

2. Discussion on Property Maintenance for Businesses and Residential Homes.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion and/or Action.

SUMMARY:

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

FISCAL/FINANCIAL IMPACT:

DISCUSSION:

ATTACHMENT(S):

None

Page 356 of 357 ends

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 12.b.

DATE: May 9, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Dianna Gomez, Executive Assistant
SUBJECT: MAYOR GLORIA OLMOS

1. Consideration of Waiving the Fees for the use of the Community Center by South El Monte High School Basketball Team for Their Annual Awards Banquet.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion and/or Action.

2. Consideration of Reinstating the Already Budgeted High School Internship Program That was Put on Hold Due to The Pandemic.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion and/or Action.

SUMMARY:

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

FISCAL/FINANCIAL IMPACT:

DISCUSSION:

ATTACHMENT(S):

None

Page 357 of 357 ends

South El Monte City CouncilMay 9, 2023

South El Monte City Council
May 9, 2023