South Gate City Council
January 28, 2025

SOUTH GATE CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at
6:30 p.m.

SOUTH GATE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
8650 CALIFORNIA AVE
SOUTH GATE, CA 90280
VIEW MEETING LIVE ONLINE AT:

HTTPS://YOUTUBE.COM/@SOUTHGATECA90280
City Officials
MAYOR,
Maria Davila

CITY CLERK,
Yodit Glaze

VICE MAYOR,
Joshua Barron

CITY TREASURER,
Jose De La Paz

COUNCIL MEMBER,
Maria del Pilar Avalos

CITY MANAGER,
Rob Houston

COUNCIL MEMBER,
Gil Hurtado

CITY ATTORNEY,
Raul F. Salinas

COUNCIL MEMBER,
Al Rios

If you would like to participate in this meeting, you can participate via the following options:

1. VIEW THE MEETING LIVE ONLINE AT: https://youtube.com/@SouthGateCA90280 Please allow up to 24 hours after the meeting for the archive to be available.

2. PARTICIPATE BEFORE THE MEETING by emailing the City Clerk at:
[email protected] no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please write "Public Comment" in the subject line.

3. ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON
*The disruption in service of any alternative method does not prelude the City Council or other legislative
body from taking further action and moving forward on the agenda.

Meeting Schedule
The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, 1 closed session business will usually commence at 5:30 p.m., when scheduled, and general business session will commence at 6:30 p.m.

Brown Act
Agendas are drafted to accurately state what the legislative body is being asked to consider. The legislative body can take action on "all items" listed on the agenda and be in compliance with the open meeting laws. Under the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The governing body may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future meeting.

City's Vision Statement
We envision a thriving, safe and inclusive community where everyone has the opportunity to access exceptional services, education and support to be resilient and live full, vibrant lives.

Public Communications
Public Comments on agenda items are limited to three (3) minutes. All comments are to be addressed directly to the Agency Members not to the members of the public.

Emails for public comment received prior to 12pm on the day of the Council Meeting will be summarized by the City Clerk, not read in its entirety. A copy of the email will be provided to the City Council and will also be available at the City Clerk's Office for public review. A copy of each email will be recorded for public record and noted on the official minutes of tonight's meeting.

Call to Order/Roll Call With Invocation & Pledge

CALL TO ORDER:

Maria Davila, Mayor
INVOCATION:

Steve Costley, Director of Parks and Recreation
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

ROLL CALL:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk

Meeting Compensation Disclosure

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54952.3: Disclosure of compensation for meeting attendance by City Council Members is $1,900 monthly regardless of the amount of meetings.

Certificates

1. Recognition of Chief Darren Arakawa as the outgoing President and Honoring Chief Manny Cid as the incoming President of the Los Angeles County Police Chief's Association

Recognition of Chief Darren Arakawa as outgoing President of the Los Angeles County Police Chief's Association and Honoring the incoming President, Chief Manny Cid. (CM) 2 Public Hearings

2. Resolution approving the Substantial Amendments to Fiscal Years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025
Annual Action Plans
Following the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council will consider: (CD) a. Adopting a Resolution approving Substantial Amendment No. 7 to the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. 2 to the Fiscal Year 2020- 2021 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. 4 to the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. 1 to Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan; and Substantial Amendment No. 1 to Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan programming Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) funds to the Street Improvement Project and South Gate Park Improvement (Attachment A); and

b. Authorizing the City Manager or the Community Development Director to initiate appropriate action necessary to implement projects and programs as noted in the FY 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan.

Documents:

Item 2 Report 01282025.pdf
Comments From The Audience - Non-Agenda Items
During this time, members of the public may address the City Council regarding any items not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council and not on this agenda. Comments from the audience will be limited to three (3) minutes per speaker; unless authorized by the Mayor, the time limit may not be extended by utilizing another member's time. There will be no debate or action on items not listed on the agenda unless authorized by law. The collective initial period of time for comments from the audience shall be limited to 45 minutes. Any speaker that did not get a chance to speak during this segment due to the 45-minute limitations will be able to speak at the end of the meeting prior to adjournment.

Note: The City Council desires to provide all members of the public with the opportunity to address the Council. Nevertheless, obscene language, comments intended to disrupt/interfere, other actions which disrupt the progress of the meeting or slanderous comments will not be tolerated and may result in ejection and/or may constitute a violation of South Gate Municipal Code Section1.04.110.

Reports And Comments From City Officials

During this time, members of the City Council will report on matters pertaining to their service on various intergovernmental boards and commissions as a representative of the City pursuant to Assembly Bill 1234. City Council Members will also have an opportunity to comment on matters not on the agenda.

3 Consent Calendar Items

Agenda Items
3, 4
and
5 are Consent Calendar Items. All items including Ordinances, Resolutions and Contracts, may be approved by adoption of the Consent Calendar, individually and collectively by one (1) motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council, the public, or staff request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action. Members of the public are permitted to speak on any item listed but their time period is limited to three (3) minutes in total.

Any motion to introduce or adopt an Ordinance on the Consent Calendar shall be: (1) a motion to waive the reading of the Ordinance and introduce the Ordinance or (2) a motion to waive the reading of the Ordinance and adopt the Ordinance, as appropriate.

3. Resolution Authorizing the Application for Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program
Grant Funds (Proposition 1 Lower Los Angeles
River Program Grant Funds)

The City Council will consider
adopting a Resolution authorizing the application for the Statewide Park Development
and Community
Revitalization
Program
Grant Funds
(Proposition
1 Lower
Los Angeles River Program Grant Funds) requesting $
1,100,342 in grants to fund
construction of the
Urban Orchard, City Project No. 539-PRK, and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
,
on behalf of the City of South Gate (“City”)
,
all
documents required
to
submit the application and implement the
grant.
(PW)
Documents:

Item 3 Report 01282025.pdf

4. Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC with BKF Engineers, Inc. for Additional Design Services for the Citywide
Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase
IV, City Project No. 699-ST
The City Council will consider: (PW)
a. Approving Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC with BKF Engineers, Inc., (Agreement) for additional design and construction support services necessary to prepare design and construction documents to repair Industrial Avenue as a part of the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST, in an amount not-to- exceed $6,226; and

b. Authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

Documents:

Item 4 Report 01282025.pdf

4 5. Minutes
The City Council will consider: (CLERK)
a. Approving the Special and Regular Meeting minutes of November 12, 2024;

b. Approving the Special and Regular Meeting minutes of November 26, 2024; and

c. Approving the Special and Regular Meeting minutes of December 10, 2024.

Documents:

Item 5 Report 01282025.pdf
Reports, Recommendations And Requests

6. Presentation on the South Gate City App

The City Council will consider receiving and filing a presentation on the South Gate mobile application ("app"). (CM)

7. Workshop to Discuss Amending Requirements for Industrial Uses, Improving Land Uses Surrounding Future Transit Centers, Enhancing Commercial Corridors, and Preparing Related Environmental Documentation
The City Council will consider: (CD)
a. Discussing

an ordinance amendment regarding industrial uses; land use improvements surrounding two future transit centers; and enhancements to commercial corridors to encourage new businesses and development;

b. Providing direction to staff on releasing a request for proposal (“RFP”) to obtain a planning and environmental consultant qualified in addressing the items above, including preparing an environmental document; and

c. Directing staff to release the RFP to qualified consultants to solicit planning and environmental services.

Documents:

Item 7 Report 01282025.pdf

8. Discussion of Remote Participation Options for City Council and Commission Meetings

City Council with consider receiving and filing a report on virtual platform options for public participation at City Council and Commission meetings, including the costs involved and factors weighing in favor and against such use and provide direction. (CM) 5 Documents:

Item 8 Report 01282025.pdf

9. Warrant register for January 28, 2025

The City Council will consider approving the Warrant Register for January 28, 2025. (ADMIN SVCS)

Total of Checks: $4,735,621.84 Less: Voids $ (200.00)
Less: Employee Payroll Deductions $
(817,699.04)
Grand Total: $3,917,722.80

Cancellations: 108079, 108270
Documents:

Item 9 Report 01282025.pdf
Adjournment
In memory of the
Hortencia Corrales, South Gate resident of over 55 years.

I, Yodit Glaze, City Clerk, certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Meeting Agenda was posted on January 23, 2025, at 4:00 p.m., as required by law.

Yodit Glaze
City Clerk

GENERAL NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The City Council adopted new rules relating to the conduct of the public meetings, proceedings, and business in the City of South Gate on July 12, 2022, (Resolution 2022-38-CC) and go into effect on August 1, 2022. Resolution #2022-38-CC is available at the City Clerk’s Office.

MEETING SCHEDULE
Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, closed session meetings will commence at 5:30 p.m. unless posted otherwise on its agenda. The regular City Council meetings will commence at 6:30 p.m. Agendas are available at the following locations:

City Clerk
Office,
Public Notice Boards at City Hall, and on the
City’s web page at https://www.cityofsouthgate.org
The Public can sign up to receive automatic notices of postings of agendas for the City Council or any other Commission or Board of the City of South Gate. Visit the City webpage and click on the Agenda & Minutes icon. That will take you the page where an individual can enter their email in the “Email Updates” box to register.

PUBLIC COMMENT/PARTICIPATION
Any person may request to address a legislative body during a public meeting. The Presiding Officer will call upon those present in the Council Chambers.
6 Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes on any item listed on the agenda, including public hearings.

Under Comments from the Audience portion, speakers are also limited to a single three (3) minutes time limit. Comments from the Audience is initially limited to 45 minutes at each meeting. Any speaker still wishing to speak, that did not speak, will have an addition Comments from the Audience opportunity after the last business item is finished. The Presiding Officer may extend the time limit as long as there is no objection from the City Council as a body.

To ensure that the public is able to participate, the City provides the opportunity to submit their comments in person, email, mail. Methods of participation may be subject to change during other such times when a State of Emergency, Health Order or State Executive Order limits in-person participation.

CURFEW
In absence of a motion duly adopted by majority vote of the City Council, the Presiding Officer may adjourn the City Council meetings at 10:30 p.m. The Presiding Officer may ask the City Council if any agenda items listed should be continued or dealt with during the meeting. For those items to be continued, the City Council can direct the item be placed on the next City Council agenda or the current meeting may be adjourned to a time certain at which time the meeting shall be reconvened as an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and action upon the published agenda continued.

STAFF REPORTS
As a general rule, staff reports. or other written documentation are prepared/organized with respect to each item of business listed on the agenda. Meeting agendas and staff reports are available at least 72- hours prior to the scheduled regular City Council meeting and a minimum of 24-hours prior to a Special City Council meeting. There are times when the City Council receives written material. revised material after the posting of agendas, these materials are become a public record and will be available for public view within 72-hours after the meeting in which they were received. Those materials and any other public document can be inspected in the City Clerk's Office located at 8650 California Avenue, South Gate.

SERVICES TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO PUBLIC MEETINGS
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the City Council Meetings, please contact the Office of the City Clerk. Notification 48 hours prior to the City Council Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility. For further information, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (323) 563-9510 or via email at [email protected]
.
7 Item No. 2
JAN 2 3 2025
F!LED l\'\\'
City of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BJ[LL
For the Regular Meeting of: January 28, 2025
Originating Department: Community Development
David Crabtree a " R-ob Houston
SUBJECT: SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTS TO FISCAL YEARS 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLANS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS.

PURPOSE: To consider approving Substantial Amendments to the FY 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2022- 2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025 Annual Action Plans. No. 3 to tlie 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan to reprogram $920,000 in CDBG funds.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Following the conclusion of tlie Public Hearing, the City Council will consider:
a. Adopting a Resolution approving Substantial Ainendment No. 7 to the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan; Substantial A+'nendment No. 2 to the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. 4 to the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. 1 to Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan; and Substantial Ai'nendment No. 1 to Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan programming Coini'nunity Development Block Grant ("CDBG") funds to the Street Improvement Project and South Gate Park Improvement (Attachi'nent A); and
b. Authorize the City Manager or the Coininunity Development Director to initiate appropriate action necessary to implement projects and programs as noted in the FY 2024-2025 Aru'iual Action Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to tlie City's General Fund.

NOTICING REQUIREMENT: Advertising and notification of the Public Hearing was conducted in compliance with Municipal Code Section 11.50.020 (Public Hearing Notification) and was publisl'ied in The South Gate Press newspaper on December 26, 2024. The notice noted a 30-day comi'nent period. Additionally, tlie Notice was posted on the City's website. Any comments received will be addressed.

ALIGNMENT WITH COUNCIL GOALS: The FY 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan supports the City Council goals of creating and protecting strong and sustainable neighborhoods by supporting projects and programs tl'iat benefit low-and moderate-income residents of South Gate. 1 8
ANALYSIS: Pursuant to HUD regulations, the City is required to carry out its Coiru'nunity Development Block Grant ("CDBG") program in a timely manner. As required by 24 CFR 570.902 of tlie CDBG regulations, HUD reviews the City's CDBG program for compliance witli tliese requirements each May 2, 60 days prior to tlie end of its cutrent program. As pait of a detailed plan to coirect course, staff propose reprogramming $920,000 of unused CDBG funds from various Ai'inual Action Plans to a construction-ready Street Improvement Project located in eligible CDBG census tracts, and to design a splash pad as pait of the continued Soutli Gate Park improvements.

The Street Improvement Project will encompass street improvements witliin CDBG eligible census tract areas:
* Industrial Avenue from Main Street to Century Boulevard. * Frontage Road from Soutliern Avenue to Miller Way * Pineliurst Avenue froi'n Tweedy Boulevard to Southern Avenue * Hildreth Avenue from Southern Avenue to Tweedy Boulevard Staff recoi'nunend allocating the available CDBG funds as follows:

FISCAL
YEAR
PLAN

PROPOSED

SUBSTANTIAL

AMENDMENT
NO.

ACTMTY NAME

CURRENT
ACTMTY

ALLOCATION

PROPOSED
BUDGET

AMENDMENT
NET
CHANGE
2019-
2020
7 Commercial Faqade
Program S50,135 §O (S50,135)
2020-
2021
2 Commercial Faqade S38,555 SO (S38,555)
2022-
2023
4 Commercial Faqade 5i<a,sso SO (S143,850)
2022-
2023
4 Business Sign Program S650,000 9250,000 (5,qoo,ooo)
2023-
2024
1 Commercial Fagade 5soo,ooo S200,000 (S300,000)
2024-
2025
1 Street Improvement Project
- Industrial Avenue SO 5zsz,sz*o 5752,540
2024-
2025
1 Splash Pad SO S180,000 S180,000
Unused Coini'nercial Fagade Program balances from FY 2019-2020, FY 2020-2021, and FY 2022- 2023 (portion of) will be reprogrammed to the Splash Pad Design project. Reprograini'ning these funds will allow staff to close out those fiscal year program activities. FY 2022-23 CDBG funds will remain available to fund the Co'i'nmercial Fagade and Business Sign Program Current Status of Commercial Fayade and Business Sign Program.

Up to $25,000 grants are available to assist eligible South Gate businesses to update, improve, and/or cortaect violations related to their business signs. Tlie Coininercial Fagade Improvement Program provides grants up to $100,000 for the exterior rehabilitation of street-facing businesses in the public 2 9
iiglit-of-way. Commercial Fagade Program applicants are required to match 10% of the total project costs.
5 applicants are interested in botli the Fagade and Sign programs.

I applicant is only interested in the Coini'nercial Fagade program. 2 applicants are only interested in tl'ie Business Sign program.

As part of the FY 2025-2026 Aniiual Action Plan process, the City may consider prograi'mning additional CDBG funds to these programs.

BACKGROUND: Tlie City of Soutl'i Gate lias been a recipient of CDBG funds annually since tlie enactment of tlie Housing and Coini'nunity Development Act of 1974. The City is deemed as an "entitlement" jurisdiction because it maintains a population above 50,000 and meets certain other demographic criteria. CDBG funding can be used for a variety of projects and programs primarily benefiting persons of low- and moderate-income.

The HUD regulations regarding Annual Action Plans mandate a citizen participation and publicreview process. This includes a public hearing prior to the submission of a substantial amendment to the Annual Action Plan.

ATT ACHMENTS:

A.

B.

Resolution approving Substantial Ai'nendment No. 7 to the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. 2 to the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Ai'nendment No. 4 to the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. I to Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan; and Substantial Ainendment No. 1 to Fiscal Year 2024-2025 At'u'iual Action Plan
Proof of Publication - Public Hearing Notices
3 10
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

GATE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBST ANTIAL
AMENDMENTS TO FISCAL YEARS 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLANS FOR THE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of South Gate ("City") participates in tlie Department of Housing and Urban Development's ("HUD") Consolidated Plan Process and receives both Coi'nununity Development Block Grant ("CDBG") and Home Investment Partnership ("HOME") 'funds.

Agencies tl'iat receive funds from HUD are required to prepare and submit an Annual Action Plan tliat identifies the projects to be fiinded;
WHEREAS, at the Regular City Council meeting of September 22, 2020, prepared and adopted a Five-Year Consolidated Plan covering the period from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2025; WHEREAS, the puipose of the Consolidated Plan and the Annual Action Plan is to identify housing and community development needs and to develop specific goals and objectives to address those needs over a five-year peiiod and is a H{JD requirement the City must meet to continue to receive federal housing and coinmunity development funds; WHEREAS, tl'ie City Council approved the aforementioned Annual Action Plans for expenditure of the entitlement grants from HUD, including the CDBG program; WHEREAS, the City Council lias deteri'nined that the FY 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2022- 2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025 Annual Action Plans need to be amended in accordance witli HUD regulations through a Substantial Amendment to reflect the clianging needs of tl'ie coininunity; WHEREAS, City staff published a public notice announcing the proposed substantial amendments in tlie December 26, 2024, edition of The South Gate Press newspaper. The thirty (30) day public review and comment period will end on January 28, 2025; and WHEREAS, tl'ie adopted budget and proposed changes to the FY 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025 Annual Action Plans for the CDBG Program propose to reprogram $180,000 of CDBG funds for South Gate Park Improvements (Splash Pad Design) and $752,540 of CDBG funds for FY 2024/2025 Street Improvements.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Tlie above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of South Gate does liereby adopt Substantial A+'nendment No. 7 to the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Ai'nendment No. 11 2 to tlie Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Ainendment No. 4 to the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 A+uiual Action Plan; Substantial Ai'nendment No. 1 to Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan; and Substantial Amendment No. l to Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan.

SECTION 3. Tlie City Manager is liereby authorized to make all confori'ning modifications and edits and to execute all implementing documents required by HUD to implement the Substantial Ai'nendment.

SECTION 4. The City Manager is hereby directed to file a copy of said Substantial Ai'nendments to HUD.

SECTION 5. The City Manager is liereby authoiized to enter into agreements with eligible sub- recipients.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution which shall be effective upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28I" day of January 2025.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

B7:

Maria Davila, Mayor
ATTEST:

By:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

B7:

Raul F. Salinas, City Attorney
5 12
SOUTH GATE PRESS Tl ii I i u i a 'i u fil iii) a i i iT 11 i i.i s'( Office ofth*
South Gate 01ty Clerk
1007 N SEI"'JlVEl)A LILVD SrE 13!i?. M)IN) 141 'IAN [IEACH CA 902CiG Tc'.lt:)'ilionc (323) 551j-5720 /Jax (2'l3) 834-058il JAN - 2 2025 FilLED
Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
CITY OF SOUTH GATE /CITY CLERK SAMJAil: 3880033
8650 CALIFORN)A AVE
SOUTH GATE, CA - 90280

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
State ol Cslitomia
Coiiniy or LOS ANGELES
N(:'11CeTY)X3: IIRG-NOTtC:EOFHEARING
Ad Descrlpiion:

Substantial Amendtnents tO FY 19/2020, 20/2021, 22/2023, 23/2024 & 24/2025 Annual Acelon Plans
I ant a ci(lzen Of Ilie Unlted StatC'l and a resldent orthe State ofC,allfornla; I anl over the age or eighteen years, and not a party to or Interested In t)ie above enlllted ma(ter. I am the prln(,lpal clerk of the prlriter and publlslier of the SOUTI-I GATE PRESS, a newspaper published in the English !anguaqe In Ihe city of SOtJTH GATE, county or LOS ANGELES, and adjudged a newspaper of general circuta(ion as defined by the laws o(the Slate ofCalifornle by the Superior Coutt of [iie Coun(y ofLO8 ANGE1.E8, State of Caflforn1a, under date 04/19/1929, Case No. 273zH6. That Ihe notice, ofwlilch the annexed Is a prlnled Cap!/, has been pubtished !n eacl'i regular and entire Issue of said riewspaper and nol in any supplement (hereofon the following dates, lo-wit:
12/26/2024
Executed on: i2/28/2024
/lt Los Angeles, Caliromla
t cert:ry (or daclare) under penaRy or par)ui'y that the foregoing Is lrLle ana correct.
rimail
13 PU6L1C NOTiCE
CITVa)'SOLITHt!ATE
CITY COuN€ll
NOTlet OF PUauC H€ARINa Pan
!lUaSY ANTIAI AMENDMINTS TO n 2tll9-2(12tl, 2032021, 2012-2024 202a-2014, & 2024-;!)25 tt*ai(nz gale: Tuesday, Mnuery 28, 2025
flniei 6M] p.m. or soon th*raafiei to s data caHaln
PIN(*i al7 HalleouncllCliainberxat 8650Cbl!omla Ave, S51lth @mg greo:ao ogscilptloni 1% City elSniiili anlg (ciiy) liorobynoll{lo$llia piibkofflpublie heailnB tnJtifiiiary2B,2025, 10 rocohVe public €Dffllllu(ItOljlhll propllsud )iubQflnlldl j'llllendmellls 10 thfl FV 201!la2020, lGXh2021- 2022a2023- 2023a202'li & 2b24a2()25 Annllnl Aellon t'tniisi PioposadAmandmenltlo theFY 20t!)-2020, 20Xk2021, 202A202j 2f+2!14024, k 2024-1(121 hnnualMtlen Plaiiy are noted Intlm table bsliiw.

Tha t.lly Council mll conduct a publlc heaihiB lo tons(der the motllTlcatlon In at!lvlty fiindlng l*vel5 hrtirtifam €i Thefoliowlnff"xoarainsinsVbeadde41ntrsiasiiaducediormlmltiaiod:

I "raoposx6 '
I susrrahm
I hughos:s'r
l , ..no, ,.

I " ""'
AC?IVIT/ NAME
CURRNNf
AmlVlTV
AllOtaAltaN
QOPO5tCl
BUDGET

AMENDMENT
HAT
€HANafl
'204")7
'_____2t+20 _l_._-_'_
56nmtarclatP,xadj"" "'
2rogram . 650,133 ' 60 le$Js} .
'-20207
__20_21 2 Commerclal Palade 08,555 GO Baa,ss5)
'-f(lr2:"
__29__za7-'
Commercial rapde 1143,850 !iO (6143,850)
-262-2-
,__2____OQ_l-. Busliiess S%ii ProBiam 9fl50,0€X) 12!0,ODQ 16400,CK)0) ":i-023. a
_i-24_1
I Commerelnl Papde 65(tO,(XK) 1200,(XX) . (am,m)
-i-24-'
__20__2s_,
'-----'-' I
1 i:jlie';ilmpiovaij;iai6ject
-jnclubttioi Avpnuii SO 5740,00C1'l ' 6740,@000
_.::a-
1 5plasli Pad SO .. 8i80,000 eta(},000. '
iililteR*viiiw Commupti AltilitV4ay liiio0lcaammtiiit(iai{iidwlll lm p+oiildoil tommadnB ontide6rn5Ut ;!6, 202d, t5muBhJiiriuiiiy zai 2025. €llllttl1! €iin (di)rnRQniAll QanlrilaQA lit ddvam.a olthe publlc homlnH to Ihn (illVnUOll6TC(1101 AWrlllli HousfilB MilMRer J'c'lWtttllt;14ilsosfft0atlts pii)iijiiivililiilliiibllliloi. ciiixaiiicaniuiimitvoibtiicomingnisuntioalycounciiiiniioiiinoariiiii pulillcMn
hvatlalillliy orDoeumoMfor Publlc Commonli A Publlc HsmlimtoJbidlnglhn pmrAmd subitonllal iiionilmqtit.> to.(Its nofod Annual Aetlon t'loru wlllbahold oiitubha*y,h+iuay 28, 20:15, steiao p.in. at- ciiy Ilrlll, caiincir Ghiiinbaii.

Coplus iiT tlio Plans are bn nlii iind avalliiblo Fot (iutillc roiilaiu at lit! Cljy afloiiltl@l(ilo,Coniii'iiiiilly oevslgpriionl bopanmen!sffd tlio cnywobpsge'iiu4iiiitingttiiir*rn*,>cbniborzu, 2(124; * illlll);tiwwlnl'ml'nll+han!aaru/tt*V'itnnllnlvoiin*llmiim7ic<ril1111UmlvoWlQaip9QliR9ulll- Q*tii-.tlgzlnaAut!vir!g
IWlWllllilBulll%cllollhO:ualltl;n,lnrllily'-Abibl !611ulb:(1111:,;di DloaT:h:I'lillAlyf\onuVlnl:ltllpl:)IQ:l?o.Pl:IUQI)(laa'll1,,"a,n:It!la('Till:),allhala;md-:yllbtl@ddllltl(1 subntllTod in [email protected] €q!111!!9n'! l!!l!y O[!tau!ti Ja),*i,a=n;,(ouiiiiyliiAlgnimni,ooja((liiqm, ' Mi'ni Cat('ia/lverall,'Ngustn@,Nlllnngati,s61o Calffomfi+ /lvllnul);gotiLi)aetlli CA9(12Qa, Via tllTiil!l at€hltllT{1112@SO81llQ.(}ljlp(JtllllJllndUT%1h(lnl(11)linff.Tl1f)Nl'llj'%lnn[lh)'nlip 6flhJtlaIlrqpl)rl@r (IIIIIIUT liifo(mii'llon ralllt9diio:11111nroJatt Jlt(ltlllf collleclt Conlad: airol %erelli Houilnz Manager
€-mall: [email protected]
MalllnH Addreis: CommunilV oavalopment Deparimem
aly Or!ioukh (iate
8650 Callfomla Menue
!!oulh Gsto, CA902a0-3075
Acnialhllllyi lira tllo InlOnlktii oTilm Clly t75pU.ili (3otg lo complywltli fha Amiit(cbnx mlll bllahlllilti$ Act () IQ all(aipiicli. !IQ{:117 or!laurli 9RfflWlll iition@ip,uqcoynmodiitp atteniliiarln tl'lut'/a roo+oiiiihlii IfTttlllTaf. Illiiaiucontnel l+io Clly tiilopii 721igiiri pllorlo ilio,:iiovoscTioiluiud publlJieailngkl) eiiiilillsh head una to diiFormfiii) Ifni)duloiiol iiteominotibiion)i foosllila, lnTiiimocl6n aii Espaflgl acerca dii iislo )unta pusde siir oblonlde llamando al 323-S639!i:45 Pub11lhffdlDO € enlbet'26i;!024
ON58 # aeeoe:ia
14 PUBLIC NOTICE
Offlee of the
South Gak ady0lMt
UEC '1 7 z4

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
CITYCOUNCIL 'F'l'LED

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR
SUBST ANTIAL AMENDMENTS TO FY 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025

ANNUAL ACTION PLANS
Hearing Date: Tuesday, January 28, 2025
Time: 6:30 p.m. or soon thereafter to a date certain Place: City Hall Council Chambers at 8650 California Ave, South Gate, CA 90280 Description: The City of South Gate (City) hereby notifies the public of a public hearing on January 28, :025, to receive public comment on the proposed substantial amendments to the FY 2019-2020, 2020- 2021, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025 Annual Action Plans.

Proposed Amendments to the FY 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, & 2024-2025 Annual Action Plans are noted in the table below,
The City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider the modification in activity funding levels for programs. The following programs may be added, increased, reduced, or eliminated:

FISCAL
YEAR
PLAN

PROPOSED

SUBSTANTIAL

AMENDMENT
NO,

ACTMTY NAME

CURRENT
ACTMTY

ALLOCATION

PROPOSED
BUDGET

AMENDMENT
NET
CHANGE
2019-
2020
7 Commercial Faqade
Program S50,135 .50 (S50,135)
2020-
2021
2 Commercial Faqade S38,555 SO (.5.qs,sss)
202.2-
2023
4 Commercial Faqade
I
!;143,850 SO (5143,850)
2022-
2023
4 Business Sign Program 6eso,ooo .5250,000 (§400,000)
2023-
2024
1 Commercial Faqade §500,000 9200,000 (5:goo,ooo)
2024-
2025
1 Street (mprovement Project
- Industrial Avenue !>O 9740,0000 S740,0000
2024-
2025
1 Splash Pad !>O S180,000 !>180,000
Public Review Comment A thirty-day public comment period will be provided commencing on December 26, 2024, through January 28, 2025, Citizens can submit email comments in advance of the public hearing to the attention of Carol Averell, Housing Manager at [email protected].

Public Hearing: The public is invited to participate in the meeting to provide input and comments, The City encourages the participation of all citizens, including non-English speaking persons as well as 15 personswithdisabilities. CitizenscansubmitverbalcommentstotheCityCouncilatthetimeofthe public hearing.

AVailability Of Document fOi' PubliC Comment: A PubliC Hearing regarding the proposed substantial amendments to the noted Annual Action Plans wNl be held on Tuesday, January 28, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers.

Copies of the Plans are on file and available for public review at the City of South Gate Community Development Department and the City webpage beginning Thursday, December 26, 2024:
* https://www.cityofsouthzate.orB/Government/Departments/Community-Development/South- Gate-Housing-Authority
Invitation to be heard: All interested persons are invited to the Public Hearing to be heard. In addition, written comments may be submitted to the City Council priorto the hearing. Comments may be submitted in writing by mailing comments to City of South Gate, Community Development Department, Attn: Carol Averell, Housing Manager, 8650 California Avenue, South Gate, CA 90280, via email at [email protected] or by calling in during the meeting. Those desiring a copy of the staff report or further information related to this project should contact:

Contact: Carol Averell, Housing Manager
Phone: 562-563-9535
E-mail: [email protected]
Mailing Address: Community Development Department
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280-3075
Accessibility: It is the intention of the City of South Gate to comp!y with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA} in all respects. The City of South Gate will attempt to accommodate attendees in every reasonable manner, Please contact the City at least 72 hours prior to the above scheduled public hearing to establish need and to determine if additional accommodation is feasible.

ESPANOL
lnformaci6n en Espanol acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida Ilamando al 323-563-9535 Published: December 26, 2024
16 Item No. 3
:A)'Xi2'.j.702';)

CITY COUNCIL
AeENJDA IBI[LJL
Departmeid Director:

For tlie Regular Meeting of January 28, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR ST ATEWIDE

PARK DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY REVIT ALIZATION PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS (PROPOSITION 1 LOWER LOS ANGELES RIVER PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS) TO FUND THE URBAN ORCHARD, CITY PROJECT N0. 539-PRK PURPOSE: To arithorize staff to submit an application for grant funding for tlie Urban Orcl'iard Project ("Project").

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution authorizing the application for the Statewide Park Development and Conu'nunity Revitalization Program Grant Funds (Proposition l Lower Los Angeles River Progran'i Grant Funds) requesting $1,100,342 in grants to 'fund construction of the Urban Orchard, City Project No. 539-PRK, and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the City of South Gate ("City"), all documents required to submit the application andimplement the grant.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. The grant application requests $1,100,342 to fund the construction of the Urban Orcliard Project.

ANALYSIS: The Rivers and Mountains Conservancy (RMC) has allocated $50,000,000 in Prop 1 funds to support infrastructure projects aimed at enl'iancing the Lower Los Angeles River.

The RMC plans to use these funds to create new parks and recreation oppoitunities in underserved communities. As part of this initiative, the Urban Orchard Project has been preliminarily selected to receive funding from the RMC's Prop 1 monies. The Urban Orchard Project is currently under construction, and an additional$l,100,342 is needed to fully fund it.

To secure the grant funds, the RMC requires a Resolution from the City Council authorizing the application and use of the funds. Key points of the required Resolution include:

The Resolution authorizes tlie City to apply for Statewide Park Development and Coi'm'nunity Revitalization Program Grant Funds (Proposition 1 Lower Los Angeles River Program) for the Urban Orchard Park Project.
* The City Council approves the submission of an application for up to $1,100,342 in grant funding for the Urban Orchard Park Project.
1 17
Funding Certification: The City certifies tliat sufficient funds will be available to complete and maintain tlie project.
it Delegated Authority: The City Manager, or his designee, is autliorized to handle all project-related negotiations, including agreements and payment requests.

BACKGROUND: The Urban Orchard Project is a transfon'native initiative along the Lower Los Angeles River, designed to create a vibrant, environi'nentally sustainable public space in an underserved coini'nunity. Featuting a variety of fruit trees, an education garden, and urban agiiculture learning spaces, the project will provide fresh produce, promote sustainable fanning practices, and erffiance comi'nunity engagement. Recreational amenities will include walking patlis, seating areas, a nature-based playground, and gathering spaces illuminated by energy- efficient LED ligliting to ensure sustainability. Additionally, the project will improve stori'nwater quality by diverting millions of gallons of water from the Bandini Cl'iannel and preventing it from directly entering the Los Angeles River. Sustainable landscaping will filter runoff and reduce pollution. By blending urban agriculture, recreation, and enviroi'u'nental restoration, the initiative aims to enhance residents' quality of life and serve as a model for sustainable public spaces.

Construction of the project is under way and scheduled for completion June 5, 2025. The budget requirement to complete construction is $31.8 million. The $1,100,342 Prop 1 grant will fully fund it, as suini'narized below:

Grants Amount
Grant
Recipient
State Water Resource Control Board (Prop 1) $7,975,100 City
Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) $3,000,000
Los Angeles County Flood Control District $530,000 Safe Clean Water- Municipal Funds $1,435,401
Safe Clean Water- Regional Funds $5,438,000
State Parks- Prop. 68 Grant $1,919,847
Conservation Corp of Long Beach $713,015
Caltrans $5,000,000
Rivers and Mountains Conservancy Funds $1,100,342
Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District $285,000 Rivers and Mountains Conservancy Funds $4,404,798
TPL
Piivate Donations $90,000
Total $31,891,503
ATTACHMENT: Proposed Resolution
GD:lc
2 18
RE,SOLUTION NO.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR STATEWIDE PARK

DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROGRAM GRANT

FUNDS (PROPOSITION I LOWER LOS ANGELES RIVER PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS)
WHEREAS, tlie State Department of Parks and Recreation lias been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for tlie administration of tlie Statewide Park Development and Coini'nunity Revitalization Grant Program, setting up necessary procedures goveniing tl'ie application;
WHEREAS, said procedures establislied by the State Depaitment of Parks and Recreation require tlie applicant to ceitify by resolution tlie approval of application(s) before submission of said application(s) to the State;
WHEREAS, successful Applicants will enter into a contract witli the State of California to complete tlie Grant Scope Project;
WHEREAS, tlie City of Soutli Gate ("Applicant") desires to apply for Statewide Park Development and Coi'nu'nunity Revitalization Program Grant Funds for tl'ie Urban Orcliard Park Project; and
WHEREAS, tlie Urban Orcliard Project is under construction and has a budget requirement of $31.8 million, for wliich $1,100,342 is needed to fully fund it.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Tlie City Council does hereby authorize the filing of an application and, if awarded, accepts up to $1,100,342 of Statewide Park Development and Cotninunity Revitalization Program Grant Funds for tl'ie Urban Orcliard Park Project ("Project").

SECTION 2. The City Corincil does hereby certify tliat said Applicant has or will l'iave available, prior to commencement of any work on tlie Project included in this application, tlie sufficient funds to complete the Project.

SECTION 3. The City Council does liereby certify that if the Project is awarded, tlie Applicant lias or will liave sufficient funds to operate and maintain the Project. 3 19
SECTION 4. Tlie City Council does l'iereby ceitify tliat the Applicant lias reviewed, understands, and agrees to tlie General Provisions contained in tlie contract sl'iown in tlie Grant Administration Guide.

SECTION 5. Tlie City Coruicil does hereby delegate the autlioiity to tlie City Manager, or liis designee, to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements and payment requests wliich may be necessary for tl'ie completion of tlie Grant Scope
SECTION 6. The City Council does hereby agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and guidelines.

SECTION 7. The City Council will consider promoting inclusion per Public Resources Code §80001(b) (8 A-G).

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution which sliall be effective upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED tliis 28"1 day of January 2025.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

B)r:

Maria Davila, Mayor
ATTEST:

B7:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
* ,
B7:

F. Salinas, City Attorney
zx 20
Item No. 4
Office of the
South Gate City Clerk
JAN 23 2025
FILED lNk" City of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL
ACENJDA aN.LL
For tlie Regular Meeting ofi January 28, 2025
Ori i i g D,epartment: Public Works
-Arturi:i ages RobHouston
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT N0. 5 TO CONTRACT N0. 2021-147-CC WITH BKF ENGINEERS, INC., FOR ADDITIONAI, DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, PHASE IV, CITY PROJECT N0. 699-ST PURPOSE: To approve Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC ("Amendment No. 5") with BKF Engineers to fund additional design and construction support services necessary to include Industrial Avenue, from Main Street to Century Boulevard, in the Residential Resurfacing Project, Phases IV ("RRP Project").

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider:
a. Approving Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC with BKF Engineers, Inc., (Agreement) for additional design and construction support services necessary to prepare design and construction documents to repair Industrial Avenue as a part of the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST, in an amount not-to- exceed $6,226; and
b. Authorizing the Mayor to execute Ai'nendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Ai'nendment No. 5 to the Agreement is in the amount of $6,226 and it is proposed to be funded in Gas Tax funds. The contract budget is summaiized below.

Contract No.
2021-147-CC

RRP PH I
SBI

RRP PH II
SBI
RRP PH m / SW

PH VIII, SBI

RRP PH IV,
SBI
Gas Tax Water PH n
& m, Water Total
Contract $68,790 $68,790 $137,578 $275,158
-Amendment No. 1 $7,973 $7,973 $7,973 $239,641 $194,720 $458,280 Amendment No. 2 $79,677 $79,677
Amendment No. 3 $87,416 $87,416
Amendment No. 4 $7,550 $7,550 $7,550 $46,790 $46,790 $116,230 Amendment No. 5 $6,226 $6,226
Total $84,313 $84,313 $153,101 $286,431 $220,109 $194,720 $1,022,987 ANALYSIS: BKF Engineers, Inc., ("BKF") is under contract to prepare design and construction documents for the RRP Project, which is currently in the design phase. With the Hollydale Park I
21 Renovation Project neaiing completioi'i, tliere is an urgent need to repair Industrial Avenue to enhance pedestrian and veliicular safety. The road pavement has deteriorated, and the sidewalks, curbs, and gutters require significant repairs. A total of $746,000 in CDBG funds lias become available. Staff recoitunends allocating these funds to support the necessary street improvements.

Tliese planned improvements will focus on critical infrastructure upgrades, such as sidewalk, curb/gutter, and ADA ramp installations, ensuiing accessibility and safety for pedestrians Ai'nendment No. 5 to tlie Agreement is recommended for approval to incorporate these improvements into tlie RRP Project. The proposed fees are considered reasonable and competitive, as they align with the services approved for similar street improvements under the existing contract.

BACKGROUND: Tl'ie RRP Project has a budget of $4,762,191 dedicated to improving residential streets and enhancing overall safety in tlie area. The Project focuses on key infrastructure upgrades, including pavement resurfacing to address the deterioration of road surfaces, ensuring smoother and safer travel for vehicles. In addition to road resurfacing, significant repairs will be made to sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and driveways, all of which are crucial components for improving accessibility and pedestrian safety. These improvements are particularly important for creating a safer environment for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers, reducing the risk of accidents, and ensuring that the streets meet current safety standards.

The final list of streets to be included in the RRP Project are listed below. With the additional of Industrial Avenue, design of the RRP Project is scheduled to be completed in January 2025.

No. STREET FROM TO
1 Liberty Boulevard Long Beach Boulevard California Avenue 2 Madison Avenue Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
3 Missouri Avenue State Street California Avenue
4 Hildreth Avenue Southern Avenue Tweedy Boulevard
5 Pinehurst Avenue Southern Avenue Tweedy Boulevard
6 Frontage Road East Southern Avenue Miller Way
7 Industrial Avenue Main Street Century Boulevard
8 Firestone Boulevard Dearborn Ave 50' East Dearborn Avenue On November 23, 2021, the City Council awarded tlie Agreement to BKF in the amount of $275,158 to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the RRP, Phase I, II and III and Sidewalk Improvements, Phase VIII.

On July 26, 2022, the City Council approved Ai'nendment No. 1 to the Agreement in the amount of $458,280 to add services to prepare design and construction documents for street improvements to be included under the RRP, Phase IV Project. Ainendment No. 1 also added services for certain water system improvements to be included under tlie Water Main Replacement, Phase II and Phase III Project.

On June 27, 2023, the City Council approved Ainendment No. 2 to the Agreement in the amount of $79,677 to add engineering services to prepare design and construction documents to 2 22
rehabilitate Southeni Avenue and Frontage Road East from approximately 250 feet east of Garfield Avenue to Miller Way.

On August 22, 2023, tlie City Council approved Ainendment No. 3 to tlie Agreement in the amount of $79,677 to add engineering services to include water improvements under RRP, Phase IV as well as to provide additional construction support setavices under RRP, Phases I, II and III.

On June 25, 2024, the City Council approved Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement in the amount of $116,230 to add services to include flatworks improvements such as sidewalk, curb/gutter, and ADA ramps under RRP, Phase IV as well as to provide additional construction support services under RRP, Phases I, II and III.

Ai'nendment No. 5 is now necessary to broaden the scope of services to include the design of improvements along Industrial Avenue, from Main Street to Century Boulevard. Additionally, the amendment will provide for enhanced consttauction support services under RRP, Phase IV, to accoini'nodate the expanded scope of work.

ATT ACHMENTS: A. Proposed Amendment No. 5
B. Amendment No. 4*
C. Ai'nendmentNo. 3*
D. Amendment No. 2*
E. Ainendment No. l*
E. Contract No. 2021-147-CC*
F. Location Map
*Each document is available for review through the City Clerk's Office.

KT:lC
3 23
Attachment A Amendment No. 5
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
AMENDMENT N0. 5 TO CONTRACT N0. 2021-147-CC WITH BKF ENGINEERS, INC., FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE

CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, PHASE IV, CITY PROJECT N0. 699-ST
This Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC ("Ai'nendment No. 5") for the preparation of additional design and construction documents for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST (the "Residential Resurfacing Project"), is made and entered into on Januaiy 28, 2025, by and between the City of South Gate ("City"), and BKF Engineers, Inc. ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes liereinafter individually referred to as a "Paity" and collectively referred to as "Parties."

RECIT ALS
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2021, the City Council approved Contract No. 2021-147- CC with Consultant ("Agreement"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I, II and III, City Project No. 662-ST and the Citywide Sidewalk hnprovement, Phase VIII, City Project No. 683-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Eight Dollars ($275,158);
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2022, the City Council approved Ainendment No. 1 to the Agreement, to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST and tlie Water Main Replacement Project Phase II and Phase III, City Project No. 702-ST, in an amount not-to- exceed Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-One Dollars ($458,281) bringing tlie aggregate total of the Agreement and Ai'nendment No. 1 to Seven Hundred Thirty- Three Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars ($733,439); WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023 the City Council approved Ai'nendment No. 2 to the Agreement, to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST for Frontage Road East Street improvement, in an amount not-to-exceed Seventy-Nine Tliousand Six Hundred Seventy- Seven Dollars ($79,677) bringing the aggregate total of the Agreement and Ainendment Nos. l and 2 to Eight Hundred Thirteen Thousand One Hundred Sixteen Dollars ($813,116); WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023 the City Council approved Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement, to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST for Frontage Road East Street improvement, in an amount not-to-exceed Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Seventy- Seven Dollars ($79,677) bringing the aggregate total of the Agreement and Ai'nendment Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to Eiglit Hundred Ninety-Two Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety-Three Dollars ($892,793);
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2024 the City Council approved Ai'nendment No. 4 to the Agreement, to add services to include flatworks improvements sucl'i as sidewalk, curb/gutter, and 4 l
24 Ainendment No. 5
to ContractNo. 2021-147-CC
ADA ramps under the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Pliase I, II, III, and IV, City Project No. 699-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed One Hundred Sixteen Tliousand Two Hundred Thiity Dollars ($116,230) bringing the aggregate total of the Agreement and Atnendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 to One Million Nine Thousand Twenty-Three Dollars ($1,009,023); WHEREAS, the City and Consultant tlierefore desire to execute Ai'nendment No. 5 to the Agreement, increasing tlie compensation payable to the Consultant in an amount not to exceed Six Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars ($6,226) to fund preparation of additional design and construction flatworks improvement sucli as sidewalk, curb/gutter, and ADA curb ramps documents to include Industrial Avenue, from Main Street to Century Boulevard. Exhibit "A" attached hereto and for construction suppoi-t for the Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV identified in Exliibit "B" attached hereto, under the teri'ns and conditions of tlie Agreement, bringing tlie aggregate total of the Agreement, Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to One Million Fifteen Tliousand Two Hundred and Forty-Nine Dollars ($1,015,249).

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. MODIFICATION TO AGREEMENT

1.1 SCOPE OF WORK. Consultant shall expand its services to the City as identified in Exhibits "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part to this Agreement. City reserves the right to auginent or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary.

1.2 COMPENSATION. The amount of compensation paid by the City to Contractor for the work identified in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall not exceed Six Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars ($6,226).

2. EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of tlie Agreement and its amendments, attachments, and exhibits thereto, shall remain unchanged in full force and effect. All tlie recitals to tliis Ai'nendment No. 5 are incorporated into the Agreement as modified by tliis Amendment No. 5. Furthermore, City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally]
5 2
25 Amendment No. 5
to ContractNo. 2021-147-CC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, tl'ie Paities hereto have caused tl'iis Ai'nendment No. 5 to be executed and attested by their respective officers hereunto duly arithorized.

ATTEST:

By:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

By:

Maiia Davila, Mayor
Dated:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

F. Salinas, City Attorney
BKF ENGINEERS, INC.:

BY:

Chris Rideout, PE, Vice President
Dated:
6 3
26 Exhibit A
December 19, 2024
Mr. Ken Tang, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
City of South Gate
Subject: SOUTH GATE CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT ADDITIONAL SERVICE REQUEST NO 6: ADDITIONAL PHASE IV SCOPE OF SERVICES

AND FEES
Dear Ken:

In accordance with your request, BKF Engineers (BKF) is pleased to present this Additional Service Request to augment the budget for design services related to the "Phase IV" streets resurfacing project. This request includes design services for Industrial Avenue, from Main Street to Century Boulevard (hereafter referred to as the "project segment"). Below, we provide a detailed breakdown of the additional scope required to incorporate the project segment into the existing design efforts.

SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 3: Preliminary Engineering
We are requesting an increased budget to account for additional efforts related to the preliminary engineering phase for the project segment. The primary activities include:

Site Visit: Conducting a field visit to evaluate the areas requiring concrete flatwork removal and replacement (R&R).

Data Collection: Utilizing site observations to inform updates to the construction documents.

No additional surveying or geotechnical work is proposed for this project segment. An orthorectified aerial image will be used as the base map for the plan sheets.

It is assumed the City will determine and provide the selected pavement rehabilitation method for this project segment.

TASK 4: 100o/o Final/Bid-Ready Plan Prep
Additional budget is requested to incorporate the project segment into the construction documents, including plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E). Design efforts will align with other segments of Phase IV and include the following:

Roadway pavement rehabilitation.

Concrete flatwork replacement (curb E!i gutter, sidewalks, cross gutters, and driveways) ADA curb ramp upgrades.

Striping modifications.

Assumptions:

ADA curb ramp upgrades will reference standard details; no additional custom construction details will be developed.

All designs will be consistent with established project standards for Phase IV.

CilyofSouth Gatei Citywide Residenticil ResurTocing Project Phase IV Additional Service Request No. 6
11P-9e
27 COMPENSATION
Below is the fee breakdown and we propose to continue to invoice in the same manner as the original contract.

Preliminaiy Engineering
100% PS&E Plan Preparation
$1,640
$4,586
Please contact me at 949-526-8478 if you have any questions regarding the additional scope items or if we need to meet to review them.

Sincerely,

BKF ENGINEERS
Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD
Senior Project Manager/Associate Principal
CilyofSouih Gatei Ciiywide Residential Resurfacing Ptoleci Phase IV Additional Service Request No. 6
21POe
28 South Gate Phase V
l"' o--="-"" a'a""a"-'ia*"-'a-" aa"'--i '-'-a-a=---'-=-'=- I l jila"ff&JlLl7 j&a' Ifflfj Jig 'all lall* u 'All! ! Ijl.lAllWl' tJ&i &V'li.l l=-l l -la I 10 11j *'*ii**iss #aa%l#% a i *i Jl- I-A-f0tf *.*larutuullul 'Lkl_lllll_}llu.l.llll lllljl ulO_J.ll.. Ul._7_..il 11 W hlill. i Ill +llll F_llll I 41NllW J}laN!-!'!Ill;l:l!llW.# ! - lFJjffl!allM41l-4WA+ l: @:'i'W!II{l lall.i!UJi*iffillA Il&illl%ll"iJ!J Ijlll% 'e iffil lffll! ffilTldlf)14illlhWMllla%l'llkl& a)iali ialQl;KA(;ffl ia& e'swainaipi !:.'_ . . " "-:i
M _ .. =. ,i5 RX'k4
t ' -' ,
k '
iJ:_J"'.:._.__...:l_.'_.x:..:..-'.-,-.-.-"l
'b tale! !>NW.!VfrtlNi!; € Ma';1!WlArimNl't'#W{WiJMl!fi!'NF..{iNll-WIN P 1ffl&i IkfflM ThW!)mTaAamiiffl!a'aa!affl"AW!$i!HQI!!Hffl!!mPll !!!a"!!!!!'!lMhi)t !taA!aa'AMC- jam t:i MMa)MMi#!!m:aN&U'Aika@alAJuii'Ni'4!?uamMl 7_.'T.
, Q
z'i 'aaa" "r, "y"'€1:l'! :i ;
i 4;jl ;(
: ' iJ!, ! :
q 'ffi"m-of"a':imi. -
t :a-* CI_-
) , -. % _ ,
J OQ: ,(l)_ ,ff , <
L;C*ffi _
a; ' : _ _
)l; .1, , ,,
_ aT.:
!:. : -(J '. a, , (I)> ;1,
= (:.f- ,
- :(l) ,.,
.'_l=
:@
.....1. ._2a' ..._...._
l"y;"-'ltP"tla.':
n_
- =-,(,,i,'=.
. }:;-s4 ---='h
(l.. '..,(,
:J W . _
(" "'C)1 . - "
"=ia; =,
-"'- :-"-'-"-'--4;"j;T'a2it; €,(, .0
. .. - hl . a':>
" -' " l- , f.
' i._ - I - .x
_ a) } e4. "
a).!t I ' =- .4
.iii. ' f - . -::' " - - "
a=" !', =,_,,
:,J!:#-
##-(Zlt'3.IJ7. :,.,' C1'_ " - '
't;;.,:; :; ;
j8D.'
a) ' i_
a -.C{ 0%' ""- 'i i-,
Gnt_ ai',
-Sa_lJ
')1"
" "E"' "l/1 "
di .! .
_:-w;':'2
= a). 6"IU 'vr
l"'='(.=-=..,-i
I ' .,a.(.
" " 1-_ . . '
' - ial- -
-" '- %
'ica'si"-'-tl:tli'-l_€al;l,
4: ' A <
-xi !pier-,t
€':";- 'i '
:;- El
e'Vmk'.
= 'Ei'ti
5'<(C-_.a- &-_ .
(; .(l).-=
,: , 5
V "':,a:,a) _
. . IA
P' .Or
,;, 'nt
i@ , 7" . . "' I
m,, ' l ,,'
J '. '
!":'J":
61';"" i
IJ ': ! ':" I.5 _ , - I

5. ' _ i_
j:i !,3. :

A, .: '>. ,t, . .x:i
(,':.., , _, :(§ . _i ::
:
o
I
-!!!
o
j:)
t/l
H
o
U
-!,
o
j:l
k/'l
Rate i' ::Qeiy __.._'€ o $;8,BtP) i, ti- -' -'a:,_...-=-=,iffl ,, ,, J, , I I;Hq;zfl 7,
tl-**:j 7 ] Ml: :J-.!!g.;:

SiteVisit l l'
Task 3 Preliminary Engineering
#za,l_'i"'l"!'
!- -
aLam-tah:i*
lQa4*.taJli&Ija#..!
A?.
+0_ - z_a+_a's's a4'4i
- = '= " -'$
k+kX? s )ia
'. ': >'i !-
h _, ___ J '. '1
lt, . . _ :
i
}.. 1. $1,6401
Task 4 Subtotal Hours i o 4 4 o o o o o o l- I
Task 4 Subtotal ($) $0 $852 $788 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O I $0 I $1,640 i Task 4100% FinCaonl/sBtriudCJIORneDaodCyumPelantnllRePVrlesl0pns 1. ..................I
130 $4,5861
!'i'-. €' ...
--...'7
-y*+a-4i7..
71-_ =Mffl?:
,l" 'i " l1)'-
_' __' If a:_ .:. J_, *a
'=lq _; ,:. . , ll:,l
i "' ""
" ' I " .16 '-"=!I
._.._...-,ul
Task 8 Subtotal Hours i o 2 o o 12 16 o o 0, ' 30 I
Task 8 Subtotal ($) $0 $426 $0 $0 $1,920 $0 $0 $0 $O N $0 , $4,586 i TOTAL
96,226 I
Add t ona Serv ce Request No 6
29 Exhibit B
m'f}Xaf3Nm!ffi?Paaifflfflla&ltM7!*!alk'&k.!'.'.TiTa.lii2Mtfffl':!FalkrsJ'riia&ll''.'W'a .!Am!tiNl'ffiaa+KfiffifWmfWefia!i+!!alie{Wfffl!a!'u'lI " a ' W@fflJT'ifll{!ffiliNR@r4NW-Uu#)The!'&i:%liA"-:aJaA#'llaj'Wffi!iil-4ffi;'lGa NPI!.fANITh'M!'.&afl:lMNJi!tm[!7MaNAiM!$!W*4{ € € !T!!$!tea'-W'i i " '
I ... .." ' , '
i'

1. 'l' = a%*=' 3
' l
i
I "
:'a'Ta+i.# #-_s* +-aasas. - _ __ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ ._ I ffi 4lffll !ATlllil jt'lllllll i [H aian[ 11jjllj lffl Ilffll !Kg i(l $4', la, fi jljl I%j I l'%i -)A- L dM-_!"-'.Jl&FM ra!fi') MA'!l}'tnF{)WZ!!l'N'e'!ff)i!ltl'< Nll;WAY'#AThJf!!l:@'l ' . . g'i
,:. ,,,, ., {{
_ _ __ _ l ____ _ 0 __ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _.,s_l :l!:
:)i'S . . aj
l' ".= i
i' '
i . _ . If
'ia)" '4
i t5T -
' - 113 a . :-"
'_C' T
!::au"a'aEt" .:to":-! '.1;; , .i i"'- ra ii .

I ia)#{ a=iy -
. rQ% (-:%.3
' :@Hu'lQ 7
't-l: :-'C-. qP., .:a..'
. .@J ,(-):,
t.' - - _ 'j
z , - .4
j."-,.,-'_ j
a" ' 'a>._ ",
;- a' -a).} :i,
l ' a. CT19 ))
4 . ,,amaa . (l- -C
-m:

A'=4<,)i l):,
:. -a)
:3: . . ',);: ;.; a% _
a,eK.::'
'& > ' _
(.' Ox
, 'b ' & - . .
(E -
al a.' "" 'a, +.
t,5.,1,,:,. ,
% l t%
. _ .J; a:Q, ka a'
4'- :& -d :m4
h:_ ffi,C., ,i>%,
I =.-. -.'-,==a_1
- - -! '!-,
A" " - "' a ' %_ ',:-. (,[5.. ='.-:f = .4 -'51-i'
=#_':a!i J
f' - . .. , . I
ai. r..
+ . = : l
§..
% i ,' a a
i!l"aa"t- ' T.
.. (U4 1. .
-lack. -
':_d_,ze*
l'7Cn" .(*,,
_:?5",5
'. ofl71'
-'-"'!)m' ih-
_ '(l)1
_,Q.%i"oj!
l . .
" :ai_ "
- G" =
.m
: _ .i la'!' & s- '
- ffl" '
3,
."$ ':
, aa)'ll.;,
%!"-
1, d, . (' CL%+'.-_u
. !
"- ;:@_ -:
ff" ;
.;q .:0 . . . %
.,H,,
:--Ll/)L'--m
rx,, r:i{\ i:
;,,_, , , ,
5 ,.C
"': ;E'o)"
14!- a'o, 1,1" :-(ff
l'; .j_
f. ?y. . /
a: ."' :l"'A"'..'? "
, 1 !)a .
"Q: L?:IA"
li-=-"-"
d. .. .. . . ,,:l
li..=i-i
I"' "-" " """"""'
I
I
I
I
I
I LljlI
I ()
II
l_
!o
10 !
I_O
l/l
H
o
U
-!l
o
_0
(/l
Rate p_Xjlg:i:7.;',-= .f#?'. Iox,' ThTh?J" : $i'Q.,'§m"!rr#:": J k's' =lj;" m aa"'aaa'affi
!:_%i-iL!
(7%_A1(.a'dlllatl
i -, - -' iiliimma-*ba.vxas
I
I I
Task 3 Preliminary Engineering
Site Visit 'I
a,..,.. .

E' =:-
!z-'--.' 4 " = " :=
l,; " 4
-'- j
!' . ==
fi _'
_%-- -l-
, j,
,_N
4 ' (,; '( ,,' -4')
# .- '_-..,{=- =
l.lW-
ffl ae :!
' _.-T.. . .1 +_ .
-" ._.-.a.=A
. .. R. ii
+-%--d J:Lr
I
I
i8 $1,6401
Task 4 Subtotal Hours o 4 4 o o o o o 0,
" - ---'- '-" '- '- - ---l
8 I
Task 4 Subtotal ($) $0 $852 $788 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 : $0 : $1,640 i Task 4100% Final/Bid-Ready Plan Prep
Construction Document:Revisions
I
III
I
30 $4,5861
r'-'\:',*
u
--'= '---y*g
' : . 's'<)0al. :'=
ffi"-H ,r. lii-. 'xlr..J,
#aa m#. ffi' 4"a
==,iv
i-aaffl a'a'- - -
9%'l+
..'n r"
aim
.. . ' -fi
IfaWttil
Z .i
=, . 11
! _. - - I
a . -' il
i, .1
Task 8 Subtotal Hours o -2 o o 12 16 o o o
'l
30 I
Task 8 Subtotal ($) $0 $426 $0 $0 $1,920 $0 $0 $0 $O I so,li $4,586 l TOTAL
S6,226 I
South Gate Phase IV
Additional Service Request No. 6
30 PHASE IV ARM,itTF
r'l li"i:[ IV PR€ P€ SED STREETS INCLUDING FRONTAGE ROAD (FROM S[IUTHERN AVE TO 400' \/EST OF MILLER MY)
STATE
PTREET CITY OF H?JNTIN(,TON PA
PL.
lj lj
r
hi
L : BERTI
lj Ij
LIBt
lj
RTY Bl
lj
VD,
lj Th lj
Bit) €
lj
ill
In_
I Nn :PENnE (CE
!,
IAL_LEY 2. _ I _
PnST l ST.

ALLEY
\ThI]_::

ALLEY St.:HUOL
I
NCE
lj
"
J :!!!5_
I ill '>lls_N_Ml 'm
.L_VEll ) e?'%- ffl- } r//
WH"",>, '7/ %'O ' SoUTHERN// %
I humroniu'u o>Wh ',_', ffl // %
I SPORTS 'J 'kl p'K // %
i CENTER a , } tl }%l
I __ //SCILITHERN AVE. %
]____]l i
I
S€ UTHER
iVE" ki '
R%st ,c(,
% )N S i,=Y
AVE.
> "A")AJr-'nfllil[I r'a € 'J?/''< t
Iw ffi *a*e. .!.- 5,II;"'D \\5d'3__
<€ <
x (z 0.
0 JO W
fil < L)
k 1_ <
I 1 " h '*
zt nu z
0 ,O
JI:K
-,/
I
I
'-J,:p
, qVE :2 L (t,,co,,
"-} ,
CE A"'
00 , l
- %% '; %y
ln,C,N,,u,%,g ,,
<tlMERSET 9h%,
i: .ffl,,'::':'., ie
N
l
r
I97,
If!i" RECREATION-PARK 3 "LlV
IJ 3a r
15: (L. I
( 97.lo
tinan AV
l," 'Jf9Bf)
I I
I I.il " SENIOR z >
ICLW'WSE aH " a' l'l TW[EnY
LEGACI
SCH[
dr lffi IE lffi It= lffi Ib 1 r_. ui I 2ff ii W ill ll 7,_ 31 JAN 2 3 2025
FfLED I\-\\>t'l
C'Uy of South Gate
CITY CO{JNCIL
Item No. 5
A(.-?NJA ITlJe
Cky Clerk:

For the Regtdar Meeting qf: January 28, 2025
Originating Department: Office of the City Clerk
YoditGlaze RobHouston
SUBJECT: APPROV AL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES PURPOSE: To historically preserve the events of tlie City Council Meetings.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City Council will consider:
a. Approving tlie Special and Regular Meeting minutes of November 12, 2024; b. Approving the Special and Regular Meeting minutes of November 26, 2024; c. Approving the Special and Regular Meeting minutes of December 10, 2024, FISCAL IMPACT: None.

ANALYSIS: The minutes are provided to the City Council on the Wednesday prior to tlieir regular business meeting. Ai'nendments should be provided to the City Clerk's Office witliin 24 hours of a City Council Meeting so that verification of the record and corrections are made accordingly. A revised document will be provided to the City Council prior to the Meeting.

BACKGROUND: The minutes typically describe the events of the meeting and may include a list of attendees, a statement of the issues considered by the participants, and related responses or decisions for the issues.

ATTACHMENTS: City Council Minutes
l
32 CITY OF SOUTH GATE

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Gil Hurtado, Mayor called a Special City Council Meeting to order at 5:31

ROLL CALL
p.m.

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Mayor Gil Hurtado, Vice Mayor Maria Davila, Council Member Maria del PilarAvalos, Council Member Joshua Barron and Council MemberAl Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Horiston, City Attorney Raul F. Salinas
l
PROCLAMATION The City Council issued a Proclaination declaring November 11 througli 15, 2024, as Law Enforcement Records and Support Personnel Appreciation Week.

CLOSED SESSION 1.

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Governi'nent Code Section 54957.6
Agency Representation:

Employee Organizations:

Rob Houston, City Manager

SGPMMA, SGMEA

CONSIDER THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF A

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
Pursuant to Goven'u'nent Code Section 54957
a. City Manager
Mayor Hurtado asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on any of tliese items.

Mario Dominguez, Jr., requesting detail infon'nation on the closed session items.

Having no one else come forward, Mayor Hurtado closed the audience portion,
Rail F. Salinas, City Attorney stated the Brown Act tells cities the forinat to use and cities will be complying. Mr. Salinas encourages Mr.

Dominguez to review the Brown Act.
2 33
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024

CLOSED SESSION
CONT'D Tlie Council Members recessed into Closed Session at 5:45 p.m. and reconvened at 6:37 p.m. with all Members of Council present. City Attoniey Salinas repoited the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Govetiu'nent Code Section 54957.6
Agency Representation:

Employee Organizations:

Rob Houston, City Manager

SGPMMA, SGMEA
On item 1, City Council had a conference with Labor Negotiator regarding a repoit on labor negotiations. Those labor negotiations led to what will be on Item No. 2 in the open session and there was no reportable action taken in closed session.

2. CONSIDER THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF A

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
a. City Manager
On item 2, the City Council received a report by the City Attorney and City Manager on process and upon completion of that report, there was no reportable action taken.

Mayor Hurtado asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak and any emails received on any of these items.

Mr. Dominguez once again requested more infon'nation on item 2. He questioned the Brown Act.

Having no one else come forward, Mayor Hurtado closed the audience portion.

OPEN SESSION
2 PERSONNEL - MOU BETW
CITY&EMPLEEGROUPS TheCityCouncilunanimouslyapproveditemsA&Bbymotionof Council Member Avalos and seconded by Vice Mayor Davila.

ROLL CALL: Corincil Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes.
a. Resolution No. 2024-73-CC entitled Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate, California, approving the South Gate Municipal Employees Association (SGMEA) MOU (Contract No.

34 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024 2024-92-CC) and tlie South Gate Professional Mid-Management Association (SGPMMA) MOU (Contract No. 2024-93-CC) for the term of July 1, 2024, tluaough June 30, 2025; and b. Authorized the Mayor to execute tlie comprehensive successor Memorandums of Understanding in a fon'n acceptable to the City Attorney.

Mayor Hurtado asked if anyone in tlie audience wished to speak on this item. Seeing no one step forward; Mayor Huitado closed the audience portion.

ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor Davila unanimously adjourned the meeting at 6:48 p.m. and seconded by Mayor Hurtado.

PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2025.

ATTEST:

Maria Davila, Mayor Yodit Glaze, City Clerk

35 CITY OF SOUTH GATE

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Gil Hurtado, Mayor called a Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:48 p.m.

INVOCATION Pastor Nick Gaiife, Gateway Assembly
PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE Nellie Ruiz, Deputy Director of Human Resources ROLL CALL Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Mayor Gil Hurtado, Vice Mayor Maria Davila, Council Member Maria del PilarAvalos, Council Member Joshua Barron and Council MemberAl Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston, City Attorney Raul F. Salinas

COMMENTS FROM THE

AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA
ITEMS Mario Dominguez, Resident is upset at the result of the recent elections.

Ruben Pichardo, Resident is reporting issues regarding employee Johanna making up violation codes to harass me since August 1, 2024. Requesting assistance to correct this issue.

Ari'nando Velasquez, Kiwanis announces the Clean-up and brunch event at Casa Abuelita. Bingo Lottery Night. Food and Gift Card Drive.

An'nando Velasquez, Resident is not happy that this year's election process did not include Q&A's, and independent interviews.

Ai'ia, Chamber of Corni'nerce announces fiiture events for November and December.

Council Member Avalos asked if parking will be allowed on the Northside of Southern Avenue during the Ch'tistmas Parade.

Darren Arakawa, Police Chief states tliat parking will not be allowed during the parade.

EMAILS: Yodit Glaze, City Clerk explains that emails that received to be read at council meetings are stu'tu'narized. If anyone is interested in having their full coininents heard are welcomed to attend city council meetings in person.
5 36
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024 EMAILS: Amy Lu, Leeland Weave Library shares upcoming events at orir local libraries.

Victor, Resident expresses issues witl'i City Clerk actions within this recent election process.

Joseph Velasco requests an expedited peri'nit review process for tlie Dominoes expansion.

REPORTS AND COMMENTS
FROMCITYOFFICIALS ArturoCervantes,DirectorofPublicWorksprovidesaCIPProject coiistruction, renovation and resurfacing updates.

Steve Costley, Director of Parks & Recreation thanks residents and cornununity for their attendance during Halloween Night & Special Olympics events.

Mereditli Elguira, Director of Coinmunity Development responds to Mr.

Picliardo's coini'nents. Currently, looking into his allegations. Also, looking into expediting the process for the Dominoe's expansion.

Wendy O'Kelly, Director ofAdministrative Services provides update tliat staff is currently working on the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report.

Nelly Cobos, Deputy Director of Human Resources urges the public to go to our city's website for job opportunities.

Darren Arakawa, Police Chief thanks comt'nunity and council for their attendance at the Family Day at the Park. Received great feedback.

Rob Houston, City Manager was able to participate in the Halloween, Veterans Day, and Family Day at the Park events and appreciates the coini'nunity participation.

Rail F. Salinas, City Attoniey has nothing to report.

Jose De La Paz, City Treasurer has nothing to report.

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk has nothing to report.

Council Member Avalos thanks the community for their participation in this year's elections. Attended Family Day at the Park. Appreciated the liard work of tl'ie Police Dept. during the Trunk or Treat event.

37 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024

REPORTS AND COMMENTS

FROM CITY OFFICIALS
CONT'D Council Member Rios congratulations council members for this election and those who paiticipated. Attended Family Day at the Park and enjoyed seeing all wl'io attended. Tl'iank you, Veterans and their families.

Would like to ask the Chief about the new administration and wonies regarding our imi'nigrant community.

Darren Arakawa, Chief of Police states that we do not enforce ii'nunigration laws. Not our jurisdiction. We do not ask iini'nigration status. We will arrest tliose that coinmit crimes in our corninunity.

Council Member Barron honored to attend tlie Veteran's Day event.

Attended Family Day at tlie Park. Thank you to the organizations that participated in our events. Looking forward to Breakfast with Santa.

Vice Mayor Davila aru'iounces tlie Power Gateway $8,000 rebate meetings November 16, 2024, and November 19, 2024. Tliank you to Steve Costley and his staff for amazing events. Thank you to detective Sarah Medrano and Tony Mendez on the Fentanyl Presentation for South Gate Middle School parents.

Mayor Gil Hurtado attended meeting with elected officials regarding issues with broadband.

Thank you to our South Gate employees for making sure our events are safe for our coinmunity.

Responds to Mr. Pichardo's cominents. I try my best to bring back anyone's issues to our staff. We strive to do eveiything we can to assist our com+'nuruty.

Elections are stressful but we offer our commitment to our comt'nunity. We might have differences, but we will respect the vote of the people.

DEVIATE FROM
THE AGENDA At this time, there being no objections, Mayor Hurtado stated that item 11 would be considered out of its regular agenda order. 11 DATA PROCESSING
SERVICES The City Council unanimously received and filed the Tecl'inology Master Plan Council Update Presentation by motion of Mayor Hurtado and seconded by Council Member Rios.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes.

38 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024 RECESS The City Council recessed at 8:29 p.m., ai'id reconvened at 8:37 p.m., with all Members of Council present.

CONSENTCALENDAR Agenda Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were approved by motion of Council Member Avalos and seconded by Vice Mayor Davila. Items 8, 9 and 10 were pulled by Council Member Barron for separate discussion.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes (recused from item 2).

Mayor Hurtado asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on any of these items or if any emails were received.

Mario Dominguez, Jr., spoke on items 6 and 2.

Having no one else come forward nor emails received, Mayor Hurtado closed the audience poition.
1 PERSONNEL BENEFITS/
RETIREMENT ADMIN Tlie City Council unanimously waived the reading in full and adopted Ordinance No. 2024-04-CC entitled Ordinance of the City Council of the City of South Gate, California, authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City of South Gate ("City") and the Board of Administration of the CalPERS to implement a cost sharing program between tl'ie Division Managers' Association ("DMA") employees, the Police Management Association ("PMA") employees, and the Police Officers' Association ("POA") employees effective on December 15, 2024, during Consent Calendar.
2 STIIEETS/SIDEWALKS/
LANDSCAPING The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-74-CC entitled A Resolution of the City Council of tlie City of South Gate, State of Califon'iia, declaring an end to the emergency situation at the Urban Orchard Park, City Project No. 539-PRK during Consent Calendar. 3 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT
& SELECTION The City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2024-75-CC entitled Resolution of tlie City Council of the City of South Gate, California, to approve tlie creation of one, full-time Public Works Maintenance Coordinator position in the Public Works Depaitment; to appropriate $109,33 1 in various funds to the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Public Works Operating Budget; and to direct staff to update tlie Consolidated Salary Schedule by adding tlie Public Works Maintenance Coordinator Title, Pay Grade, and Pay Range during Consent Calendar.

39 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024 4 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT
& SELECTION The City Coruicil unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2024-76-CC entitled Resolution of tlie City Council of the City of South Gate, California, to approve tlie reclassification of one part-time Business License Inspector position in the Administrative Services Department to one part-time Code Enforcement Officer in the Coininunity Development Department during Consent Calendar.
5 FINANCjAL MGMT The City Council unanimously approved items A & B during Consent Calendar:
a. Ai'nendment No. 3 to Contract No. 3218, Professional Services Agreement with BMO Bank, extending the banking services contract through December 31, 2025, and
b. Autliorized the Mayor to execute Ax'nendment No. 3 in a fon'n acceptable to the City Attoniey.
6 DATA PROCESSING
SERVICES The City Council unanimously approved items A & B during Consent Calendar:
a. Ai'nendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2023-97-CC with ClientFirst Technology Consulting, retroactively effective July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025, for continued project management services for the implementation of the Technology Master Plan in an amount not-to- exceed $189,830;
b. Autliorized the Mayor to execute Ai'nendment No. 1 in a fon'n acceptable to the CityAttorney.
7 WASTEWATER MGMT The City Council unanimously approved items A, B & C during Consent Calendar:
a. Agreement (Contract No. 2024-94-CC) with Hadronex, Inc., DBA SmartCover Systems, Inc., for monitoring, maintenance, and operation of the SmartCover System for a three-year teim for a not-to-exceed amount of $184,249;
b. Appropriated $25,771 in Sewer Funds to fully fund services for Fiscal Year 2024/25; and
c. Autliorized the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a fori'n acceptable to the City Attorney.

Page5of7 9
40 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024 8 SCHOOLS/EDUCATION Tlie City Council unanimously approved the Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") (Contract No. 2024-95-CC) between tlie City of Soutli Gate Police Depaitment and St. Helen Catliolic Scliool for the assigni'nent of a School Resource Officer ("SRO") in accordance with the COPS Hiring Grant requirements during Consent Calendar. 9 INVESTMENTS The City Council unanimorisly received and filed the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, during Consent Calendar.
10 INVESTMENTS The City Council unanimously receiving and filing tlie Quaiterly Investment Repoit for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, duiing Consent Calendar.
12 LAW ENFORCEMENT The City Council unanimously received and filed a sumi'nary 011 the state of the Soutli Gate Police Department Community Engagement events for the calendar year 2024, by motion of Mayor Hurtado and seconded by Council MemberAvalos.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, 13 CITY COUNCIL
yes.

APPOINTMENTS Tlie City Council unanimously ratified the motion by Council Member Maiia del Pilar Avalos to remove Adolfo Varas as lier representative from the Citizens' Advisory Coini'nittee by motion of Council MemberAvalos and seconded by Council Member Barron.

ROLLCALL: CouncilMemberAvalos,yes;CouncilMemberBarron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes.
14 WARRANTS The City Council unanimously approved the Warrant Register for November 12, 2024, by motion of Council Member Avalos and seconded by Mayor Huitado.

Total of Checks:

Less: Voids
Less: Employee Payroll Deductions
Grand Total:
$3,767,725.25
$ (1,237.20)
$ (401,601.43)
$3,364,886.62
Cancellations: 104327, 104738, 104740, 105165, 105511, 107479, 107679, 10790

41 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024 14 WARRANTS CON'D ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Corincil Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Huitado, yes.

ADJOURNMENT Council MemberAvalos unanimously adjourned the meeting in memory of several coinmunity members that passed away in the past couple of weeks due to illnesses at 9:47 p.m. and seconded by Vice Mayor Davila.

PASSED and APPROVED this 28f'l day of January 2025.

ATTEST:

Maria Davila, Mayor Yodit Glaze, City Clerk

42 CITY OF SOUTH GATE

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Gil Hurtado, Mayor called a Special City Council Meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.

ROLL CALL Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Mayor Gil Hurtado, Vice Mayor Maria Davila, Council Member Maria del PilarAvalos, Council Member Joshua Barron and Council MemberAl Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston, City Attorney Rail F. Salinas
1 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT
& SELECTION The City Council unanimously received and filed tlie list of new and promoted full-time employees hired or promoted during October 2024.

CLOSED SESSION The Council Members recessed into Closed Session at 5:41 p.m. and reconvened at 6:46 p.m. with all Members of Council present. City Attorney Salinas reported the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING

LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a),
54954.9(b)(3)(C)
a. Monica Guzman v. City of South Gate, et al.
b. James Hugar v. City of South Gate (WCAB)
Item 1(a) is a claim involving a slip and fall on a city sidewalk. There was a report given by the City Attorney and upon completion of the report, the City Council authorized the City Attorney to defend the action by motion of Mayor Hurtado and seconded by Council Member Avalos and the vote was 5-0.

Item 1(b) is a workers' compensation claim. There was a presentation made by outside counsel retained by the city and upon completion of that report, there was a motion made by Council Member Avalos and seconded by Mayor Hurtado to approve a proposed settlement. The settlement itself needs to be finalized and approved by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and it will be disclosed pursuant to the Brown Act. Vice Mayor Davila did not participate in that discussion nor present in closed session. 12 43
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 2024

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED

LITIGATION
Pursuant to Governi'nent Code Section 54956.9(c)
One (1 ) - Potential Case
On item 2, the City Council received a report by the City Attorney's Office and a presentation by the City Manager with respect to one claim of potential litigation and upon completion of that report, guidance was given but there was no reportable action taken by the Council.

3. CONSIDER THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF A

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 and 54957.6 a. City Manager
On item 3, there was a discussion had with City Council and upon completion of that discussion, tliere was no action taken by the City Council.

ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor Davila unanimously adjourned the meeting at 6:48 p.m. and seconded by Council MemberAvalos.

PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2025.

ATTEST:

Maria Davila, Mayor Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
13 44

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

RF,GULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Gil Hurtado, Mayor called a Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:55 p.m.

INVOCATION Steve Costley, Director of Parks & Recreation PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE BetsyCamano,RecreationCoordinator
ROLL CALL Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Mayor Gil Huitado, Vice Mayor Maria Davila, Council Member Maria del PilarAvalos, Council Member Joshua Barron and Council Member Al Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston, City Attotney Rail F. Salinas

COMMENTS FROM THE

AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA
ITEMS Eiik Denials, 40-year resident lives on the Eastside of the 710 freeway and has an issue with a light pole. We all have been in the dark for 3 months and have seen a rise in crime.

Lizette Ruiz, Resident lives on Kauffi'nan is requesting assistance in cleaning up the railroad tracks on Independence.

Issues at Hollydale Park in the play areas and is requesting an upgrade.

Children play with sand, and it is dirty.

Ruben Pichardo, Resident is reporting issues regarding emails sent to council and go unanswered. Tlie issue with Johanna has not stopped. She continues to go to his home and takes pictures. Code Enforcement tells liim there is no problem with his trailer. Mr. Pichardo need transparency and a resolution to his issue.

Jane Denial, Resident lives on Garfield and Imperial. She witnessed a transient with a cardboard home, and it was recently removed. Thank you.

What can be done witli the homeless issue on Imperial? Ana, Director of the Chamber of Coi'mnerce provides infori'nation regarding the Thanksgiving Dinner event and Christmas Parade.

EMAILS: Mario Dominguez is requesting the addition of a camera for Media Dept. employee Giselle Heriiandez. Also, is asking when construction will resume at the Urban Orchard location?
14 45
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 2024

REPORTS AND COMMENTS
pr<oucrryoppiciats Ax-turoCervantes,DirectorofPublicWorksprovidesaresponsetoMr.

Dominguez. Construction has resumed.

Currently working witli City Manager in working with the Railroad company to assist in clean-up. Issues has been ongoing but will work diligently to solve the problem.

Steve Costley, Director of Parks & Recreation provides inforination on several events witl'iin the city for December.

Wendy O'Kelly, Director of Administrative Services has notliing to report.

Jon Hamilton, Director of Human Resources has nothing to report.

Darren Arakawa, Police Chief attended the Memorial Run in Honor of Alexis Gonzalez with the Explorer Graduation Class.

Jose De La Paz, City Treasurer has nothing to report.

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk has nothing to report.

Jose De La Paz, City Treasurer has nothing to report.

Rob Houston, City Manager introduces New Planning Manager Jol'u'i Signo.

John Signo, Planning Manager introduces himself to Council and community.

Rail F. Salinas, City Attorney has nothing to report.

Council MemberAvalos thai'iks the coinmunity and invites community to apply for coini'nissions team.

Council Member Barron tlianks the South Gate Jr Athletics Minor Division Toy Diive. Over 100 toys we donated by the division players and participants City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, Vice Mayor Maria Davila, and Mayor Gil Hurtado.

A special thank you to Javier Zamora a fon'ner resident of our city. Every year lie donates a full car of toys.

Thank you to my father who donated $1,000 for this toy drive.

Congratulations to the Minors Wolverines for wii'u'iing the championship.

46 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 2024

REPORTS AND COMMENTS

FROM CITY OFFICIALS
CONT'D Participated in tlie Turkey Giveaway in our city. Be thai'ikful of all we have. Any help that anyone can provide to others will retuin to you tenfold.

Council Member Rios wislies everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.

Vice Mayor Davila thanks JB Hunt for gift cards donations, Mr. C's Towing for donating 10 turkeys per scliool (Total of 25 schools), and Primestor donations of gift cards.

Happy Thai'iksgiving to everyone and our South Gate City Staff.

Mayor Gil Hurtado tlianks Mr. C's, UWS, Northgate for their donations.

To our City Clerk Yodit Glaze, City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, and Council Member Joshua Baroon, and the JAA Board for their hard work and donations.

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone.

CONSENT CALENDAR Agenda Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 were unanimously approved by motion of Council MemberAvalos and seconded by Vice Mayor Davila.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Council Member Batron, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes.
1 DATAPROCESSING
SERVICES Tlie City Council unanimously approved items A, B & C during Consent Calendar:
a. Ainendment No. 2 to Contract No. 3425 with Edgesoft, Inc., for $13,000 to implement SolarAPP+.
b. Accepted CalAPP funding and appropriating $60,000 to implement automated solar peri'nitting software SolarAPP+.
c. Authorized the Mayor to execute Agreement No. 2 in a fonn acceptable to the City Attorney.

47 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 2024 PARK Tlte City Council unanimously approved items A & B during Consent Calendar:
a. A+'nendment No. 2 to Contract No. 2022-82-AC witli David Volz Design Landscape Arcbitect, Inc., ("Agreement") to provide additional construction support services for the construction of the Hollydale Coitununity Park Renovation, City Project No. 607-PRK, at a cost not to exceed $46,919, and extending tlie contract tenn through June 30, 2025; and
b. Authorized the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 2 in a fonn acceptable to the CityAttorney.
3 PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
,jU)Mm The City Council unanimously approved items A & B during Consent Calendar:
a. Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 2023-134-AC with W.G.

Ziinrnen'nan Engineering, Inc. ("Agreement") to extend the term of the contract to Marcli 1, 2025, and to continue engineering staffing support services until the vacant Assistant Engineer position is filled, a not to exceed amount of $100,000; and
b. Authorized the Mayor to execute Ai'nendment No. 2 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

WASTEWATERMGMT TheCityCouncilunanimouslyapproveditemsA,B&CduringConsent Calendar:
a. Agreement (Contract No. 2024-97-CC) with W.A. Rasic Construction Company, Inc., for On-Call Municipal Water and Sewer Systems maintenance services for a three-year ten'n with two optional one-year extensions, in an annual amount not-to-exceed $350,000 for a total of $1,050,000;
b. Appropriated $200,000 in Water Funds from the unrestricted balance of the Water Fund and $150,000 in Sewer Funds from the unrestricted balance of the Sewer Fund to fully fund the Agreement; and c. AuthorizedtheMayortoexecutetheAgreementinaforinacceptable to the City Attorney.

48 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 2024 5 LAW ENFORCEMENT The City Council unanimously approved items A, B & C during Consent Calendar:
a. Authorized utilization of tlie 2024-2025 Selective Traffic Enforcement Program ("STEP") Grant Funds in the amount of $170,000 for overtime, equipment, and traii'iing expenses;
b. Ar'nended tlie Fiscal Year 2024/25 Law Enforcement Grants Fund Budget by appropriating $123,402 for overtime salaries, $43,341 for equipment, and $3,257 for training expenses; and
c. Authorized tl'ie Chief of Police to execute the STEP Grant Agreement (Contract No. 2024-98-CC) in a fori'n acceptable to the City Attorney. 6 LAW ENFORCEMENT The City Council unanimously approved items A, B, C & D during Consent Calendar:
a. Authorized utilization of 2022 Homeland Security Grant Program Funds in the amount of $45,577 for law enforcement equipment to address civil unrest, crowd control and active shooters; and b. IncreasedtheFiscalYear2024/25revenueprojectioninAccount Number 232-541 (Law Enforcement Grants - Homeland Security Grant) to $45,577; and
c. Aanended the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Law Enforcement Grants Fund Budget by appropriating $45,577 to Account Number 232-541-21- 6204 (Law Enforcement Grants-Homeland Security Grant - Small Tools and Equipment); and
d, Autliorized the City Manager to execute the State Homeland Security Grant Program Subrecipient Agreement (Contract No. 2024-99-CC) for Grant Year 2022.
7 WATF.R The City Council unanimously approved items A & B during Consent Calendar:
a. Accepted completion of tl'ie Water Main Replacement, Phase I, City Project No. 689-WTR by All Cities Engineering, Inc., effective November 26, 2024; and
b. Directed the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with Los Angeles County Registrar Recorder's Office.

49 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 2024 8 MINUTES The City Council unanimously approved items A, B, C & D duiing Consent Calendar:
a. Special Meeting minutes of October 1, 2024;
b. Special and Regular Meeting minutes of October 8, 2024; c. Special and Regular Meeting minutes of October 22, 2024; and d. Special Meeting minutes of October 28, 2024.
9 COMMUNITY DEV/
HOUSING The City Council unanimously approved items A & B by motion of Council MemberAvalos and seconded by Council Member Rios. a. MemorandumofUnderstanding(ContractNo.2024-102-CC)between the County of Los Angeles and City of South Gate Lead Free Homes LA Program management services; and
b. Authorized the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding in a form acceptable to the CityAttorney.

Rob Houston, City Manager stated Carol Averell, Housing Manager will provide a presentation.

Carol Averell, Housing Manager provided a presentation.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes.
10 WARRANTS The City Council unanimously approved tlie Warrant Register for November 26, 2024, by motion of Council Member Avalos and seconded by Vice Mayor Davila.

Total of Checks:

Less: Voids
Less: Employee Payroll Deductions
Grand Total:
$4,071,113.23
$ (0.00)
$ (424,235.65)
$3,646,877.58
ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes.

50 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 2024 ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor Davila unanimously adjourned tlie meeting in memory of Maiie Lascalo and Marta Leticia Lisa Cruz, longtime teaclier from Steam Legacy Higli School at 7:41 p.m. and seconded by Council Member Avalos.

PASSED and APPROVED tliis 28Ih day of Januaiy 2025.

ATTEST:

Maria Davila, Mayor Yodit Glaze, City Clerk

51 CITY OF SOUTH GATE

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Gil Hurtado, Mayor called a Special City Council Meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Mayor Gil Hurtado, Vice Mayor Maria Davila, Council Member Maria del Pilar Avalos, Council Member Joshua Barron and Council Member Al Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston, City Attorney Rail F. Salinas
WASTEWATER MGMT The City Council unanimously approved items A, B, C, D, E, F & G by motion of Vice Mayor Davila and seconded by Council Member Rios.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Council Member Bairon, recused; Mayor Huitado, recused.
a. Agreement (Contract No. 2024-100-CC) with Sancon Technologies Inc., for tl'ie construction of the Sewer Pipeline Lining Improvements, City Project No. 709-SWR, in an amount not-to-exceed $2,143,727; b. Authorized the City Manager to administratively approve contract change orders up to a cumulative amount of $250,000 to avoid delaying construction when change order work is needed, which will be fiinded from project contingency funds;
c. Approved Change Order No. 1 to reduce the scope of work and $502,368 in cost, which cost reduction is in accordance with unit bid pricing, as necessary to complete the project within budget; d. Authorized the City Manager to approve pre-payments of construction progress payments to comply with State legislation that requires making payments within 30 days from receipt of an invoice; e. Approved Notice of Exemption for the Sewer Pipeline Lining and Improvements, City Project No. 709-SWR, pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15301 Class l of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA");
f. Approved filing a Categorical Exclusion Checklist with the appropriate federal agency for the Sewer Pipeline Lining and Improvements, City Project No. 709-SWR, pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA"); and 21 52
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024 g. Autl'ioiized the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a fon'n acceptable to tlie City Attorney.

CLOSED SESSION Tlie Council Members recessed into Closed Session at 5:22 p.m. and reconvened at 6:31 p.m. witli all Members of Coruicil present. City Attorney Salinas reported the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING

LITIGATION
Pursuant to Govetatu'nent Code Section 54956.9(a),
54954.9(b)(3)(C)
a. Rosa Marquez v. City of Soutli Gate, et al.

Item I(a) is a new lawsuit. There was a presentation made by the City Attorney and upon completion of that presentation, there was a motion made by Vice Mayor Davila and seconded by Mayor Hurtado and on a vote of 5-0, authorized the CityAttorney to represent the city in that matter.

2. CONSIDER THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF A

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
Pursuant to Governinent Code Section 54957 and 54957.6 a. City Manager
On item 2(a), the City Council received a presentation by the City Manager and at the end of that presentation there was no action taken by the City Council.

ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor Davila unanimously adjourned the meeting at 6:34 p.m. and seconded by Council Member Avalos.

PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2025.

ATTEST:

Maria Davila, Mayor Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
22 53

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Gil Hurtado, Mayor called a Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:34 p.m.

INVOCATION Tina De La Rosa, Deputy Director of Parks & Recreation PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE Flavio Morales, Tweedy Mile Advisory Board Member ROLL CALL Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Mayor Gil Hurtado, Vice Mayor Maria Davila, Council Member Maria del Pilar Avalos, Council Member Joshua Barron and Council Member Al Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston, City Attorney Raul F. Salinas
ELECTION ADMm The City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2024-80-CC entitled A Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate, California, reciting the facts of the General Municipal Election held on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, and declaring the results and such other matters as provided by law, by motion of Vice Mayor Davila and seconded by Mayor Hurtado.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes.

ELECTION ADMIN The City Council unanimously authorized the administration of the Oath of Office (by ballot order) to the re-elected City officials elected from the General Municipal Election on November 5, 2024:
a. City Council Member, Maria R. Davila;
b. City Council Member, Gil Hurtado;
c. City Council Member, Maria del Pilar Avalos.
3 COUNCIL
RE-ORGANIZATION The City Council:
a. Re-organized by nominating and selecting a new Mayor and Vice Mayor for a one-year term; the selection was be ratified by a majority vote of the City Council; and
23 54
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024 3 COt+NCIL

RE-ORGANIZATION CONT'D
b. The Oaths of Office were administered to the newly selected Mayor and Vice Mayor.

Council MemberAvalos motioned to nominate Vice Mayor Davila as Mayor and seconded by Mayor Hurtado.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Davila, yes; Mayor Hurtado, yes.

Mayor Davila motioned to nominate Council Member Barron and seconded by Council Member Hurtado.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Barron, yes; Council Member Hurtado, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Mayor Davila, yes.

COMMENTS FROM THE

AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA
ITEMS Mario Dominguez, resident is upset at the result of the recent elections.

Ask Vice Mayor Davila to resign to allow Franbert Calderon to join the council.

Sophie Ryan, resident is happy with the results of this elections and wants everyone to know that Maria Davila spends so much time in the schools' helping students and parents.

Lizette Ruiz, a Kauffman resident congratulates council on their re- elections and for always helping our community.

Yvonne, a resident who would like to thank Maria Davila for her involvement in our community, assisted our city to build new schools, supported the Azalea Shopping Center. During the pandemic she distributed food to our needy families. She collaborates and is very active in various organizations.

Maria Navarro, 9411 San Antonio resident and would like to thank Maria Davila for her being present and even when she is ill. Ms. Davila, Mr.

Hurtado, Mr. Barron, and Mr. Al thank you for your leadership.

Leticia Vasquez-Wilson, Director of Central Basin Municipal Water District. Congratulations Mayor Hurtado, Maria Davila and thank you for your work. Also, to Maria Del Pilar Avalos.

55 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024

COMMENTS FROM THE
AUnlENCE-NON-AGENDA
ITEMS Luis Gerardo Cuellar/Lorraine Avila Moore. Council Members from City of Lynwood, presenting certificates of appreciation to the three (3) re- elected council members. A special thank you to Council Member Avalos who also served the City of Lynwood.

Residents from Garfield Avenue recently filed a complaint and thanks Maria Del Pilar Avalos for assisting them in this matter.

Maria Diaz, resident and would like to congratulate Maria Del Pilar Avalos for always supporting the community.

Carmen Avalos, congratulations to Pilar, very proud, for your contribution, continue making changes, congratulations to the council members, would have liked less mudslinging which typically happens in South Gate, and disappointed with the irregularities with this election.

Claudia, Executive Director from Casa Sonora. Congratulations to each one of you on your re-election. Proud of you and look forward to working with you. Keep up the good work.
44I'I Congressional District representative on behalf Nanette Diaz Barragan congratulated council members for their re-elections. Presented council members with certificates.

Mario Dominguez, Resident is upset at the result of the recent elections.

Ruben Pichardo, Resident is reporting issues regarding employee Johanna making up violation codes to harass me since August 1, 2024. Requesting assistance to correct this issue.

Armando Velasquez, Kiwanis announces the Clean-up and brunch event at Casa Abuelita. Bingo Lottery Night. Food and Gift Card Drive.

Armando Velasquez, Resident is not happy that this year's election process did not include Q&A's, and independent interviews.

Aria, Chamber of Commerce aru"iounces future events for November and December.

Council Member Avalos asked if parking will be allowed on the Northside of Southern Avenue during the Christmas Parade.

Darren Arakawa, Police Chief states that parking will not be allowed during the parade.

56 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024 EMAILS: Yodit Glaze, City Clerk explains that emails that received to be read at council meetings are summarized. If anyone is interested in having their 'full comments heard are welcomed to attend city council meetings in person.

Amy Lu, Leeland Weave Library shares upcoming events at our local libraries.

Victor, Resident expresses issues with City Clerk actions within this recent election process.

Joseph Velasco requests an expedited permit review process for the Dominoes expansion.

REPORTS AND COMMENTS
FROMCITYOFFICIALS ArturoCervantes,DirectorofPublicWorksprovidesaCIPProject construction, renovation and resurfacing updates.

Steve Costley, Director of Parks & Recreation thanks residents and community for their attendance during Halloween Night & Special Olympics events.

Meredith Elguira, Director of Cornrnunity Development responds to Mr.

Pichardo's comments. Currently, looking into his allegations. Also, looking into expediting the process for the Dominoe's expansion.

Wendy O'Kelly, Director of Administrative Services provides update that staff is currently working on the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report.

Nelly Cobos, Deputy Director of Human Resources urges the public to go to our city's website for job opportunities.

Darren Arakawa, Police Chief thanks community and council for their attendance at the Family Day at the Park. Received great feedback.

Rob Houston, City Manager was able to participate in the Halloween, Veterans Day, and Family Day at the Park events and appreciates the community participation.

Raul F. Salinas, City Attoriiey has nothing to report.

Jose De La Paz, City Treasurer has nothing to report.

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk has nothing to report.

57 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024

REPORTS AND COMMENTS

FROM CITY OFFICI ALS
CONT'D Council Member Avalos thanks the community for their participation in this year's elections. Attended Family Day at the Park. Appreciated the hard work of the Police Dept. during the Trunk or Treat event.

Council Member Rios congratulations council members for this election and those who participated. Attended Family Day at the Park and enjoyed seeing all who attended. Thank you, Veterans and their families.

Would like to ask the Chief about the new administration and worries regarding our irnrnigrant community.

Darren Arakawa, Chief of Police states that we do not enforce immigration laws. Not our jurisdiction. We do not ask immigration status. We will arrest those that commit crimes in our community.

Council Member Barron honored to attend the Veteran's Day event.

Attended Family Day at the Park. Thank you to the organizations that participated in our events. Looking forward to Breakfast with Santa.

Vice Mayor Davila announces the Power Gateway $8,000 rebate meetings November 16, 2024, and November 19, 2024. Thank you to Steve Costley and his staff for amazing events.

Thank you to detective Sarah Medrano and Tony Mendez on the Fentanyl Presentation for South Gate Middle School parents.

Mayor Gil Hurtado attended meeting with elected officials regarding issues with broadband.

Thank you to our South Gate employees for making sure our events are safe for our community.

Responds to Mr. Pichardo's comments. I try my best to bring back anyone's issues to our staff. We strive to do everything we can to assist our community.

Elections are stressful but we offer our cornrnitment to our community. We might have differences, but we will respect the vote of the people.

CONSENT CALENDAR Agenda Items 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 were approved by motion of Council Member Avalos and seconded by Mayor Davila.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Hurtado, yes (recused from item 8); Council Member Rios, yes,, Vice Mayor Barron, yes (recused from item 8); Mayor Davila, yes.

58 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024 4 SUBDIVISIONS The City Council unanimously approved items A & B during Consent Calendar:
a. Resolution No. 2024-77-CC entitled Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate, California, approving Final Parcel Map No. 84194 subject to minor correction; and
b. Authorized the Mayor to execute the Resolution in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
5 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT
& SELECTION The City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2024-78-CC entitled A Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate, directing staff to amend the City's consolidated pay schedule to update the hourly pay rates for certain hourly positions to conform to the minimum wage law effective January 1, 2025, and to update the hourly pay rates for certain hourly positions to remain consistent with their full-time counterparts with an effective date of January 5, 2025, during Consent Calendar.
6 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT
& SELECTION The City Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2024-79-CC entitled Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate, California, to approve the update to the compensation for the position of Police Dispatcher in the Police Department during Consent Calendar. 7 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEMS MGMT The City Council unanimously approved items A & B during Consent Calendar:
a. Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. 1885A with Outfront/JCDecaux, extending the term one year through December 31, 2025, to continue bus shelter and bus shelter advertisement services; and b. Authorized the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 5 in a form approved by the City Attorney.

59 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024 WASTEWATER MGMT The City Council approved items A, B & C during Consent Calendar:
a. Agreement (Contract No. 2024-101-CC) with Willdan Engineering, to provide Construction Management and Inspection Services for the construction of the Sewer Pipeline Lining Improvements, City Project No. 709-SWR, in an amount not-to-exceed $233,174;
b. Authorized the City Manager to approve and execute amendments up to a cumulative amount of $75,000 to be :tunded with project contingency :tunds; and
c. Authorized the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
9 STREETS/SIDEWALKS/
LANDSCAPING The City Council unanimously approved items A, B & C during Consent Calendar:
a. Purchase Order for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Service Request No. 272492 to authorize the County to complete bridge railing repairs as a part of the Firestone Boulevard Bridge over I-710 Freeway, City Project No. 719-ST, for an amount not to exceed $100,000;
b. Authorized the City Manager to approve change orders to the purchase order up to a cumulative total of $30,000; and
c. Authorized the City Manager to execute the Purchase Order, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
10 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE
,!U)MIN The City Council unanimorisly approved items A, B & C during Consent Calendar:
a. Authorized the purchase of a 2025 Ford F-450 Super Duty Stencil Paint Truck from National Auto Fleet Group, utilizing the Sourcewell Co-Opt Purchasing Program, for the maintenance of City streets, in an amount not-to-exceed $167,508;
b. Appropriated$8,197inCapitalAsset&EquipmentReplacement Funds to fully fund the purchase; and
c. Authorized the City Manager to execute the documents necessary to purchase the 2025 Ford F-450 Super Duty Stencil Paint Truck in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

60 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024 It
ClTY COUNCIL The City Council unanimously approved items A & B during Consent Calendar:
a. The cancellation of the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting of Tuesday, December 24, 2024; and
b. Authorized the City Council Auditor to review and approve the second warrant register for December 2024.
12 CITY COUNCIL
APPOINTMENTS The City Council considered:
a. Appointing representatives to various outside boards and agencies of which the City of South Gate is a member; and
b. Ratifying the appointment of the City Council Auditor by the Mayor, as stipulated under South Gate Municipal Code Section 1.04.170 (Auditor).

Mayor Davila stated item 12 will be continued to the City Council Meeting of January 14, 2025, except for the agencies the Mayor is the representative. Council Member Avalos requested to be the alternate on the County Sanitation Districts and Los Angeles County City Selection Committee.

Mayor Davila appointed Vice Mayor Barron to be the City Council Auditor.

Item was so moved by Council Member Rios and seconded by Vice Mayor Barron.

ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Hurtado, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Barron, yes; Mayor Davila, yes.

61 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2024 WARRANTS The City Council unanimously approved the Warrant Register for December 10, 2024, by motion of Council Member Avalos and seconded by Mayor Davila.

Total ofChecks: $3,169,359.11
Less:Voids $ (0.00)
Less: Employee Payroll Deductions $ (462,491.82)
GrandTotal: $2,706,867.29
ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Council Member Hurtado, yes; Council Member Rios, yes; Vice Mayor Barron, yes; Mayor Davila, yes.

ADJOURNMENT Council MemberAvalos unanimously adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. and seconded by Council Member Hurtado.

PASSED and APPROVED this 28'h day of January 2025.

ATTEST:

Maria Davila, Mayor Yodit Glaze, City Clerk

62 Office of the
South Gate City Clerk Item No. 7
JAN 2 3 2025

CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA BNLL
For the Regular Meeting o'f: January 28, 2025
Oiiginating Department: Community Development
DavidCrabtree R6bHoust6n
SUBJECT: WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS AMENDING REQUIREMENTS FOR

INDUSTRIAL USES, IMPROVING LAND USES SURROUNDING FUTURE TRANSIT

CENTERS, ENHANCING COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS, AND PREPARING RELATED

ENVIRONMENT AL DOCUMENT ATION
PURPOSE: Staff is seeking direction from Council to address three important issues: (1) an ordinance amendment regarding industrial uses; (2) land use improvements surrounding two future transit centers; and (3) enhancements to cominercial corridors to encourage new businesses and development.

An environi'nental review to analyze potential ii'npacts created by an ordinance or other actions is required pursuant to the Califoiwia Environi'nental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider:
a. Discussing an ordinance amendment regarding industrial uses; land use improvements surrounding two future transit centers; and enhancements to comi'nercial corridors to encourage new businesses and development;
b. Providing direction to staff on releasing a request for proposal ("RFP") to obtain a planning and environmental consultant qualified in addressing the items above, including preparing an environmental document; and
c. Directing staff to release the RFP to qualified consultants to solicit plaru'iing and environinental services.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: Public notification other than publishing the City Council agenda in a timely manner is not required for a workshop. Once an ordinance amendment has been prepared, advertising and notification of a public hearing will be conducted in compliance with the South Gate Municipal Code ("SGMC") Sections 11.50.020 and 11.50.030.

FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that planning services would cost $350,000 to $400,000 and environmental services would cost $150,000 to $330,000 plus contingency. The total ranges from $500,000 to $750,000. Funding would be paid from the General Fund.

ALIGNMENT WITH COUNCIL GOALS: The FY 2024-2025 Annual Action Plans supports the City Council goals of creating and protecting strong and sustainable neighborhoods by supporting projects and programs that benefit low-and moderate-income residents of South Gate. 1 63
ANALYSIS: Tl'ie City of South Gate's ("City") 2015 Zoning Code prohibits new industrial warehouse development over 15,000 square feet (SF). Through previous discussions, City Council directed staff to review options to make the city more business friendly so tliere is a better balance between businesses and residential neigliborhoods. Additionally, Metro is planning to build two new transit centers in the City wliich will directly affect suirounding properties and potentially be a catalyst for improvements in our cominercial corridors. In order to foster development in a way that improves tlie quality of life for residents, staff l'ias prepared a scope of work that covers the following:

1. Ordinance Ainendment: Consider a citywide ordinance that proposes a broader definition of industrial uses, particularly in relation to warehousing and truck-generating businesses.

Currently, the City has a 15,000-square-foot limit on warehousing and part of the industrial land use review would include either eliminating or revising that limit.

2. Future Transit Centers: Consider addressing land uses surrounding two Metro transit centers scheduled to be constructed over the next 10 years within the City boundaries. Staff seeks recoininendations to create overlay zones or similar for each area surrounding these stations to promote economic benefits for the City through expanded development zoning. The City will be partnering with Metro to coordinate transit center plaru'iing.

3. Coini'nercial Corridors: Staff seeks recornrnendations on zoning overlay adjustments that would promote more opportunities for business growth and redevelopment along major coi'nu'nercial corridors within tlie City. This includes the entire length of Tweedy, Firestone, and Long Beach Boulevards, and Atlantic Avenue.

A planning and environmental consultant will be needed to develop standards and policies to address the items above as well as the related enviroi'imental documentation. Staff has reached out to tlie City's "bench" consultants, which includes De Novo, Kimley Horn, and EcoTierra. Estimates range from $500,000 to $750,000 to do the plaru'iing and environmental work, which may vary depending on what is included in the scope and the extent of the impacts to be considered. This includes $350,000 to $400,000 to cover the ordinance amendment and other planning work, and between $150,000 to $330,000 for the environi'nental document, plus contingency.

In terms of completion, it could take the consultant 8-10 months for the planning portion and 12-14 months to complete the envirom'nental document assuming an environmental impact report ("EIR") is required. Some of the work could be done concurrently; however, a comprehensive update could take about 12 months; however, the scope will have to meet the City's goals and adjustments may be necessary as staff works out the details.

The consultant would need to provide the following services:
* Researcliing ordinances of other cities to identify applicable requirements, general conditions, mitigation measures, etc. for:
o Industrial uses, including warehouses
o Transit centers/stations
o Major retail/comt'nercial corridors
2 64
* Identifying constraints and opportunities within the City for new warehouses and other industrial uses.
* Identi'fying streets and intersections that would be impacted by tiuck traffic generated from warel'iouses and other industrial uses.
* Identifying lii'ikages from industrial areas to transit stations/corridors and major commercial areas and determining ways to improve tliose linkages. * Providing comi'nunity outreacli including community meetings to receive resident feedback. * Providing recommendations encouraging a point-of-sales within the City to generate sales tax. * Recoi'nu'nending parking alten'iatives to reduce the required number of parking spaces, encourage alternative transportation, and promote train ridership. * Recorni'nending zoning and code adjustments that would encourage new restaurants, retail, and other comi'nercial businesses along major corridors. * Providing an adequate California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") document including furnishing appropriate technical reports such as analyses of air quality, noise, traffic, etc., and drafting mitigation measures.

BACKGROUND: On April 16, 2024, the Planning Commission ("Commission") lield a public hearing on a similar item to consider a Zone Code Ai'nendment to modify Title 11, Chapter 11.21 of the SGMC to revise the City's Ordinance pertaining to building area maximums for warehousing land use types. The Coinmission considered two resolutions: the first, Resolution No. 2024-02A, recomi'nended to the City Council that the City's Zoning Code be revised to eliminate size limitations on warehouses in the City's Urban Mixed-Use Zones and Cornrnercial Industrial Zones; the second, Resolution No. 2024-02B, would direct staff to study the matter further and return to the Comi'nission later with recommendations. The Coi'ni'nission voted to deny both resolutions by a vote of 3-2 and 5- 0, respectively.

On May 28, 2024, City Council considered an appeal of the Planning Coini'nission's denial of tlie Zone Code Ainendment. City Council received public cornrnents from members of the public. At the conclusion ofthe hearing, the City Council voted to uphold the Planning Coi'nmission's action denying a Zone Code Amendment. The motion passed by a vote of 3-2. Council directed staff to explore alternatives of having a cap on warehouse use in the City, and further research the issue on industrial uses. Subsequently, staff engaged the services of Kosmont Companies ("Kosmont") to provide guidance on what other cities are doing in regards to industrial use policies.

On August 21, 2024, City Council received a presentation from the Kosmont Companies ("Kosmont") on an industrial land use study. Kosmont was retained by the City to research various policies adopted by select cities. While there are a few cities that prohibit new warehouses, most create policies to generate substantial revenue from new warehouses to offset traffic and other impacts and help achieve a better balance between businesses and residential neighborhoods. The City's industrial land is in high demand because the City is in a prime location near Port of LA and Long Beach. The growth of e-cominerce also lures businesses and developers who are seeking opportunities for new warehouses and distribution centers in the City. The City has a number of industrial zoned parcels that are suited for redevelopment, but questions arose as to what will be acceptable uses in the future. Currently, there 3 65
are industrial areas in the City that are blighted and underutilized and landowners and businesses are interested in bringing industiial land uses, including warehousing, to revitalize tliese areas. Industrial development with warehousing can create opportunities for landowners and create jobs, but they can also create negative impacts for the coinrnunity. The City Council took no action but directed staff to review options for development alternatives.

ATT ACHMENTS:

A.

B.

C.

Scope of Work for Ordinance Ai'nendment Regarding Industrial Uses, Future Transit Centers and Comi'nercial Corridors, and Related Envirom'nental Work Industrial Land Use Study by Kosmont Companies, August 21, 2024 City Council Agenda Bill for May 28, 2024, meeting on Appeal of Planning Comt'nission Action Regarding Zoning Code Amendments 4 66
Attachment A
Scope of Work for Ordinance Amendment Regarding Industrial Uses, Future Transit Centers and Commercial Corridors, and Related EnvironmentalWork
The City is seeking assistance to address three important South Gate issues: (1) an ordinance amendment regarding industrial uses; (2) land use improvements surrounding two future transit centers; and (3) enhancements to commercial corridors.

1. Ordinance Amendment: Prepare a draft citywide ordinance that proposes a broader o Industrial uses, including warehouses
o Transit centers/stations
o Major retail/commercial corridors
* Identifying constraints and opportunities within the City for new warehouses and otherindustrial uses.
* Identifying streets and intersections that wouLd be impacted by truck traffic generated from warehouses and other industrial uses. 5 67
* Identifying linkages from industrial areas to transit stations/corridors and major commercial areas and determining ways to improve those linkages. * Providingrecommendationsencouragingapoint-of-saleswithintheCitytogenerate sales tax.
* Recommending parking alternatives to reduce the required number of parking spaces, encourage alternative transportation, and promote train ridership.

Providing an adequate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) including furnishing appropriate technical reports such as analyses of noise, traffic, etc., and drafting mitigation measures. document
air quality,
68 Attachment B
atyof
South
(,ate-

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

INDUSTRIAL LAND USE STUDY
AUGUST 21,2024
2301 Roseci ans Ave, Suite 4140
EI Segundo, CA 90245
TEL 424-297-10701 URL wwwkosmontcom
-,J
69 OVERVIEW
The City of South Gate ("City") 2015 Zoning Code prohibits new industrial warehouse development over 15,000 SF.

Because of the City's prime location near Port of LA and Long Beach and the growth of e-commerce, the City's industrial land is in high demand. Landowners and developers are looking for opportunities to site new warehouses and distribution centers in the City. City has a number of industrial zoned parcels that are suited for redevelopment, but there are questions as to what will be acceptable uses for this land in the future.

Currently there are industrial parcels in the City that are blighted and underutilized. Landowners and businesses are interested in bringing in industrial land uses that include warehouse operations, as a way to renew their parcels.

Industrial development with warehouses can create opportunities for landowners and create jobs, but they can also create negative impacts for the community.

The City Council directed staff to review options for development alternatives, which are discussed in this report.

Thus, Kosmont Companies ('4Kosmont") was retained by the City to research various policies adopted by select cities.

While there are a few cities that prohibit new warehouses, most create policies to generate substantial revenue from new warehouses, to offset traffic and other impacts, and help achieve a better balance for both the business and residential communities.
kosl KOSMONT COMPANIES I 2
00 70

OVERVIEW
The scope of this Study and discussion is to review alternatives to the current restrictions in place for industrial use, including a 15,000 sq. ft. cap on new warehouse space. A review of what other cities do to regulate industrial uses is presented herein and the Study includes:

Identification of industrial areas within City of South Gate and how truck trips are routed Review of three ways cities look to collect revenue to offset impacts of industrial uses Case studies of California cities industrial use policies Possible policy suggestion for discussion
Possible next steps
It is important to note that the number one issue concerning South Gate residents is increased truck traffic. The City has a limited number of truck routes that are focused at pinch points along Firestone at Atlantic Ave, 1-710 freeway and Garfield Ave. as shown on the following slide. It will be important for City retain a traffic expert to determine realistic traffic volumes from a range of warehouse uses, identify mitigation measures and likely costs in order to calculate the development impact fees needed to cover necessary roadway and other improvements.

The Kosmont study, along with a focused traffic analysis, will help the City evaluate potential changes to the Zoning Code and other policy options.
ko!!4, KOSMONT COMPANIES
71 CITY OF SOUTH GATE

INDUSTRIAL ZONING
& TRUCK ROUTE MAP

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IS

CONCENTRATED IN THE

NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE

CITY SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTING

FIRESTONE BLVD, ATLANTIC AVE

AND GARFIELD AVE
Sources: City of South Gate (Accessed August 2024)

LE(IEND
ffl TnlCk ROute
Zonlng
[ilu - light lndusinal
ffl+il2 Light +.lanujacruiing
[ilConldoi31CDR31
KOSMONTCOMPANIES I 4
72 FIREpNQ BIVD.
50tJ?HIRN AVE.
nAl!:EDV 41LVD a
36395
26!110
76802
4970'l
X
'i
I
LEGEND

LEVELS OF SERVICE AT KEY INTERSECTIONS

LOCATIONS
FIRESTONE BLVD. AND G ARFIELD AVE.

FIRESTONE BLVD. AND RAYO AVE.

FIRESTONE 3LVD. AND ATLANTIC AVE.

FIRESTONE BLVD. AND CALIFORNIA AVE.

FIRESTONE BLVD. AND LONG BEACH BLVD.

GARFtELD AVE. AND SOU"n-IERN AVE.

GARFIELD AVE. AND IMPERIAL HW/.

IMPERIAL HWY. AND WRIGHT RD.

LONG BEAO-I BIVD. AND SOUTHERN AVE.

LONG BEACH BLVD AND 'nA/EEDY BLVD.
'n/VEEDY BIVD. AND ATLANTIC AVE

LEVELOF SERVICE
F
r

DAILYTRIPS
7(IK AND 35K
00K AND 1!M
37K AND 49K
36K AND 20K
30K AND 29K
23K AND 50K
29K AND 15K
27K AND 20K
71! TRUCK ROUTE CITY souryobsy
<osinQn,4r Sources: City of South Gate (Accessed August 2024)

KOSMONT COMPANIES
73 CITY OF SOUTH GATE - 2015 WAREHOUSE

RESTRICTION
Land use permission tables in Section 11.21.030 of the Zoning Code establish the uses to which land in each zone may be put. Table

11.2'l-3 specifies uses allowed in the Urban Mixed-Use zones, and Tabie 11.21-4 specifies uses allowed in the Commercial Industrial zones. Under those tables, warehousing is permitted (subject to issuance by the City of a Conditional Use Permit) in the Industrial Flex (IF), Light Industrial (LF), Light Manufacturing (M2) and Heavy Manufacturing (M3) zones. However, footnote 18 in Table 11.21- 3 and Footnote ') I in Table I ').2j-4 each limits the size and placement of warehouses within those zones as follows:
"Limited to maximum building area of fifteen thousand square feet and is not permitted along street frontage (would have to be a rear use)."
These footnotes were incorporated into the South Gate Municipal Code in 2015 when the Planning Commission prepared, and the Council enacted, a comprehensive update to the Zoning Code. The Planning Commissioners and City Council Members who were in office at that time felt the inclusion of these footnotes was necessary to prevent a proliferation of large warehouses in the City which would cause detrimental impacts to the community.

KOSMONT COMPANIES I 6
74 FEE / CUP / DA RESEARCH
a In addition to research on industrial policies, Kosmont interviewed the local National Association of Industrial and Office Properties ("NAIOP"), local industrial real estate brokers, and land use attorneys to get a broad perspective on how primarily southern California communities address industrial warehouse challenges. a While many cities have Development Impact Fees ("DIF") that are charged to new industrial development, state law requires nexus studies to create a schedule of fees by land use type to assure parties are charged for fair share of infrastructure costs. The standards used to measure traffic impacts from new development are typically based on ITE standards using the number of employees at a location, which is -1 per I,000 SF and fees range from $2 to $5 per SF. Therefore, many Nexus studies do not necessarily factor in the number of trips and the time of day involving warehouse/e-commerce truck unloading and loading of goods for local delivery. a Kosmont research found that most cities utilize a Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") or Development Agreement "DA") negotiation with industrial developers to give the City flexibility to negotiate large impact fees and annual special taxes to address the unique circumstances involved with wide range of businesses utilizing warehouse space.

Our Study found most concern with large scale e-commerce distribution facilities, but many corporations utilize facilities that combine regional HQ's, R&D, manufacturing and local Business to Business ("B to B") distribution, that vide high paying jobs, significant assessed value for property taxes and local sales tax generation. kosffl6nF KOSMONT COMP ANIES
75 o

SUMMARY OF REVENUE METHODOLOGIES
There are many ways for the City to address developer proposals and increase the public revenues from industrial uses, such as Fees, Taxes and negotiated Public Benefits:
a Approach: FEES - Cost recovery for new development fair share of increased infrastructure/public facility costs o Commission a Nexus Study to determine realistic traffic volumes from a range of warehouse uses and to calculate the development impact fees needed to cover necessary roadway and other improvements Examples:
o Monrovia Nexus study indicated Industriaf Traffic cost of S2,"/00 per PM peak hour trip o Burbank Nexus study indicated Warehouse allocated Transportation cost of §'lO,500 per PM peak hour trip (however the aaual fee was based on /TE trip factor of only O.34 trips per I,000 SF - so fee was S3.80 per SF) o Burbank Nexus study O/SO estimated impads on other public facilities at $3.67 per SF for tota/ of S7.47 per SF o Hayward Nexus study indicated max DistSbutionNVarehouse Traffic Fee of S8.24 per SF of building area o Clovis established Industrial lm-pact Fees of $6 to '§i7 per SF that cover fx:ilice, fire, water facilities in addition to streets o Fontana warehouse impact fees are -$5 per SF
ko!!!l KOSMONT COMPANIES I 8
76 REVENUE METHODOLOGIES (CONT.)
N Approach: TAXES - Requires public vote
o Adopt a utility tax for buildings greater than X,000 SF o Adopt a parcel tax for industrial properties greater than X,000 SF o Adopt a business license tax equal to $X to $Y per SF for all industrial uses o Form a CFD Services District to collect annual assessments to cover annual maintenance related to range of industrial o In lieu Sales Tax Assessment Revenue (STAR*)oR subject to credit/fee waiver for onsite sales tax generators Examples:
o EI Segundo warehouse annual business tax is S150 per employee plus SO.17 per SF of building area = -S0.30 per SF o Vernon warehouse annua/ business license tax is S0.2'/ per SF (max of S72,000 per business) o Carson established annua/ CFD specid tax of $98 per industrial employee and $5,324 per acre of land = -SO,30 per SF o San Bernardino Coun'ff reportedly established annual service fee of 50.34 per SF (as part of Bloomington Specific Plan) o Jurupa Valley has used Development Agreements to negotiate STARoR annua/ fxtyments of §O.jO per SF. kos!!!,, KOSMONT COMPANiES I 9
77 REVENUE METHODOLOGIES (CONT.)
s Approach: PUBLIC BENEFITS - Implemented through a Development Agreement "DA") negotiation o Adopt policy requiring a Development Agreement for development greater than X,000 SF o Establish baseline public benefit payment (e.g. $5 per SF) Examples:
o Vernon recently adopted Development Agreement requirement for any warehouse greater than 150,000 SF - most recent project negotiated St million communiq benefit fee equal to -S7 per SF of building area o Jurupa Valley has used Deve/opment Agreements to negotiate communiq benefits for large scale (> I million SF) industrial uses equal to - S3 per SF
o San Bernardino Coumy established communiff benefits payment o'f'J2.00 per SF (as part of Bloomington Specific Plan) o Moreno Valley negotiated $7 million contribution for resident job training as part of World Logistics Center DA kos!!1, KOSMONTCOMPANIES I 10
78 JOBS VERSUS TRIPS
jOBS
4 MANUFACTURING OFFICE/RESEARCH DOMESTICWAREHOUSE/DIST INTERNATIONALWAREHOUSE/DIST LOGISTICS/SHIPPING TRANSLOADING

TRUCKTRIPS
ko!X!l KOSMONT COMPANIES I II
79 MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL POLICY REFERENCES
A number of California municipalities have enacted industrial policies in recent years to address the influx of large distribution centers and warehouses associated with the online retail industry. There is a significant need for large warehouse facilities where sorting, storage and ultimate distribution of retail products can take place. Concerns around these uses relate to their high generation of truck trips paired with low job counts at relatively low pay.

Municipal Industrial Policy References:
s Fontana
a Vernon
a San Bernardino County
ffl Carson
ffi Redlands
s Jurupa Valley
s Moreno Valley
s Pomona
g Burbank
u Central Valley Cities
kosl, KOSMONTCOMPANIES I 12
80 FONTANA
The City of Fontana has approved over 16 million SF of warehouses in past few years. The upfront development fee the City charged to cover circulation impacts was approximately $5.00 per SF of building area for industrial uses. No fee for municipal services
Fontana was sued by environmental groups over approval of two large warehouse projects in the southern part of the City. In 2022 the Attorney General of CA announced a settlement with the City that protects community from pollution. The City has adopted a new ordinance that is the strictest in the State requiring landscape buffers, use of solar power, zero-emission vehicles, truck routing plans, and 'prohibition of off-site parking and vehicle stacking. kos!!!l KOSMONT COMP ANIES 13
81 VERNON
In June 2022, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1283 (Attachment 2), a 45-day urgency moratorium ordinance. Ordinance No. 1283 was adopted to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by prohibiting the establishment, expansion, or modification of warehouse uses, freight terminals, truck terminals, container storage, and container parking in the City.

Vernon subsequently adopted a permanent ordinance (Municipal Code Section 17.84.060) that requires new warehouse in excess of 150,000 SF must utilize a DevelopmentAgreement, public hearing and approval by the City Council.

There has been one project approved through the DA process. In March 2024, GPTVernon, owner of an old industrial building on 7. I acre site at 5764 Alcoa received approval to demolish existing buildings and construct a new 153,000 SF warehouse building. The DA requires owner to pay $1 million community benefit fee payable in four installments of $250,000 each, with a potential credit against year 2 thru year 4 payments for utility taxes paid in excess of a formula provided in DA. This community benefit is equal to approximately $7 per SF for a similar development proposed in South Gate.
kos!!!l KOSMONT COMPANIES 14
82 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
The County of San Bernardino recently approved a +21 3-acre specific plan with Howard Industrial partners to redevelop an unincorporated residential community of 138 low income single family residences with 3.2 million SF of new industrial warehouse development and 480 units of high density multi-family units. This project faced intense community opposition due to the removal of hundreds of families.

According to RSG report, the Bloomington Specific Plan's Community Benefits included a $2.00 per SF upfront fee and $0.34 per SF annual payment. Kosmont was not able to verify these community benefit fees. kosl KOSMONTCOMPANIES I IS
83 CARSON
The City of Carson has examined many policies to generate more revenue from industrial development in the City. In 2017 they considered establishing annual business tax, but there was major opposition. In 2018 the City hired Kelly Associates to examine feasibility of Interim Development Impact Fee Ordinance, which was adopted in April 2019 to help fund streets and other public facilities. City also hired NBS to examine the fiscal impact of new development to justify a new CFD No 2018-01 that calculated annual special tax burdens on new development to fund enhanced roadway maintenance.

Development impact Fee ("DIF")
Carson adopted the recommended 2019 DIF for industrial uses totaling $2.20 per SF of building area. (As point of comparison the DIF for Multi-Family is $25,000 per unit) CFD Special Taxes
Carson also established annual CFD special tax of $98 per industrial employee and $5,324 per acre of land kO!?l KOSMONTCOMPANIES I 16
84 JURUPAVALLEY
Due to industrial developer pressure, and desire for community benefits, Jurupa Valley has approved changes to several planning areas to allow industrial development in areas that were designated for residential and commercial.

Agua Mansa Commerce Park
In 2020 the City approved a Development Agreement to allow development of 4.4 million SF of industrial warehouse on a 208-acre former cement plant site.

In addition to standard impact fees, the City negotiated a wide range of community benefits:
a $4 million for a Community Recreation Facility and $500,000 for North Rubidoux Master Planning and City administrative costs.
a Facility Maintenance Assessment - $50,000 per year ffi General Fund Special Assessment (STAR"O')- Annual fee of $O.IO per SF for industrial buildings ($440,000 per year) kos!4! KOSMONTCOMPANIES I 17
85 JURUPAVALLEY
The District
The District is a 2023 Specific Plan of -200 acres that allows 1.5 million SF of warehouse, 1.3 million SF of commercial and 1,200 MF housing units to replace Emerald Ranch Specific Plan (I,000 SF housing units and 20-acres of retail) In addition to paying standard City Development Impact Fees, developer must also make the following:
a Facilities Benefit Contribution - $110-$183 per unit annual fee for residential - zero for industrial a Infrastructure Maintenance Contribution - $123 per acre for light industrial & $37 to $61 per residential unit s Public Safety Contribution - Annual fee of $0.044 per SF of building area for light industrial & $206 to $343 per residential unit
ffi There were several other community benefits totaling $3-4 million for supportive housing, arts & culture, community room lease, commercial rehab contribution and commercial truck ordinance enforcement. ko5! KOSMONT COMPANIES 18
86 MORENOVALLEY
In 2020, Moreno Valley approved a Development
warehouse project on -2,000 acres of undeveloped land.

Research by RSG indicated that the deve(opers were requi to pay $300 million in Impact Fees, however the site is rural undeveloped land at the far east edge of the City and massive infrastructure is needed to prepare sites for development. Job creation was the major community benefit. for the World Logistics Center, a proposed 40 million SF A review of the Development Agreement found that actual community benefits were as follows:
s $6.99 million for education workforce training in logistics industry payable $1 million upfront and $0.1I per SF for each building permit
ffi $500,000 for State Route 60 landscaping
s $'l75,000 for air filtration systems for existing propeities within the project area kos! KOSMONT COMPANIES ig
87 POMONA
Because of long-term community concerns over e-commerce warehouse development impacts on traffic and air quality, the City of Pomona adopted a temporary moratorium in 2022 on new industrial warehouse, while the City underwent a major update of it zoning code that was 75 years old.

In June 2024 the new code was adopted, and as a result warehouse or distribution buildings are not permitted except in the Fairplex Overlay Zone
kosffl6m KOSMONT COMPANIES I 20
88 BURBANK
In 2022 the City of Burbank commissioned a Nexus Study by EPS and Fehr Peers to update the Development Impact Fee ("DIF") program. The Study analyzed impact of expected new residential, commercial and industrial development on the need for police, fire, library and park facilities, information technology and transportation infrastructure.

For transportation impact fees the study examined the increase in PM peak hour trips and estimated the average capital cost to mitigate to be -$10,500 per trip. For warehouse/industrial the Study used ITE trip generation tables of O.34PM peak trips per 1,000 Sr'; which yielded a traffic impact fee of $3.62, adjusted for inflation to $3.80 per SE (We note that ITE PM peak trip generation faaors for warehouse are significantly less (-10%) as compared to commercial uses - indicating that such ITE factors may not take into account business to consumer delivery trips).

The study also identified warehouse/industrial impacts on police, fire, parks and library facilities that justified fees of $3.67 per SF.

The Study's total DIF was estimated at $7.47 per SF for warehouse/industrial buildings. kos!al, KOSMONTCOMPANIES I 21
89 REDLANDS
As a result of community concerns regarding impacts that warehouses were having, the City of Redlands established a moratorium on warehouse development in 2022. This enabled City to study and draft a new ordinance regulating where and how new distribution centers could be built.

City Council approved the Ordinance that limits any warehouse exceeding 50,000 SF from being more than I mile from an I-$O or 1-210 freeway exit/entrance ramp. In addition, no warehouse/distribution centers greater than 150,000 SF can be built south of l-10 or east of 1-210 freeway.

The City also decided to put a business tax increase for warehouse uses on the Nov. 2022 ballot. The Measure J initiative passed, and it increased the annual tax to $0. 105 per square foot of building area. kos!a!L KOSMONT COMPANIES 22
90 CENTRAL VALLEY CITIES
Kosmont recently prepared a development impact fee survey for the City of Clovis that showed the range of impact fees that Central Valley cities charge for commercial and industrial development.

The ana/ysis found that not only do fees vary by tyJpe of land use, but b> giugi upliiy Ivcation (e.g., higher fees for area with least infrastructure in place). See i//ustration on next s/ide Clovis had front-end fees for industrial ranging from $6 to $7 per SF of building area to cover allocated capital costs for water, sewer, parks, police, fire, and streets. As point of comparison, City commercial impact fees ranged from $21 to $30 per SF reflecting much higher perceived traffic volumes.

Other cities in the region had industrial fees ranging from $2 to $9 per SF (also a fraction of the commercial fees). kos!!!l xosmox'r compxxibs I 23
91 RETAIL OFFICE INDUST
5 4_29 S 4.l9
5 5.75 S 4J9
!l O.69 S 1.50
5 6,557 5 6,557
S 9,338 S 9i33g
S 1_l0
S 2.68
S O.49
S 6,557
S 9,338
5 . 17_al !> ' 7.89 S _ 2;12,
5 xis;zgs' s5 _ _ zag7as_ S - , iaa,ggs
5-_ _-29,629 S' _ ig;ggs , S- 7,2;iS
'S - 17-03 S '7-76 i _2.09
S 296;295 S 2]373S_ S .144,i9S
-S 29.629 S '19,895 S 7,145
S 8.a7 S a_os. S 1.09
S zx:x,sss * 1!92,655 S 124,295
6 21,IJI!a S iG,OSS S Fi,llS
kos!!l KOSMONT COMPANIES I 24
92 a A 0
kosl
$ Per SF of Bldg Area
i r Impact Feesl -Annual Taxes - Public Benefhl
LAArea
Burbank
Carson-
Vemon
Long Beach
Monrovia
EI Segundo
Suburban/Rural
Fontana
Haywam
Jurypa Valley
Moreno Valley
Redlands
Pornoria
San Bemamino County
Clovis
$7:j7 psf
$2.20.psf
$4.50 psf
$0.-30-psf
$021 psf
$0-30 psf
$s,oopsf ?
$8.24 psf - ' - ?
,, ? $0.100Jpsf
$9.00psf . ?
-? $0'.105 psf
-Wamhouse developMritispmhibited
$0-.34 psf
$6:00 -$7.00 psf
$7.00 psf
$3,QQ psf '
$0.20 psf
$2.00 psf
These are illustrative examples h'om intemeland 3m party research

KOSMONT COMPANIES
93 POLICY SUGGESTIONS
Here are potential revenue sources for City Council policy consideration, as it relates to permitting warehouse development or redevelopment, subject to further due diligence, study and market conditions:

I. City to commission traffic/road capacity study to define maximum traffic that can be accommodated or mitigated with capital investmentThis would be basis for a Nexus study for Development Impact Fees (could range from $5 to $10 per SF of project - assuming major traffic improvements are needed and can feasibly be done)

2. Based on public works road maintenance assessment, City can establish BusinessTax or CFD SpecialTax (could range from $0.25 to $0.35 per SF of project per year)

3. City can define DevelopmentAgreement requirements for projects greater than 50,000 SF or so, and establish a baseline fee (could range from $4 to $6 per SF of project for community benefits that can be increased based on the specific circumstances)
A 200,000 SF warehouse could resu/t in upfront feeslbenefits of S2-4 million, f:ilus annual revenue of'fh50,000 to S70,000 ko!!!l KOSMONT COMPANIES I 26
94 NEXT STEPS
a CounciLneedstodecideiftheCitywantstoputbusinesstaxonthebalLotand/ordoNexusstudy for Development Impact Fees.
a If a Citywide Land use change is recommended, it would trigger the need to conduct an environmental review.
a TheCouncilwouLdfirstidentifytheirpreferredindustrialusefeatures,andthenthereviewwould be conducted, which could involve a significant amount of time (up to 12 months) and substantial c ost.
ko!!!l KOSMONT COMPANIES I 27
95 CITY OF SOUTH GATE

INDUSTRIAL LAND USE STUDY

THE ANALYSES, PROJECTIONS, ASSUMPTIONS AND ANY EXAMPLES PRESENTED HEREIN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES AND ARE NOT A GUARANTEE OF ACTUAL AND/OR FUTURE RESULTS. ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE EXPRESSED /N THIS ANALYSIS, AS RESULTS ARE DIFFICULTTO PRE)ICT AS A FUNCTION OFMARKET CONDITIONS, NATURAL DISASTERS, PANDEtVllCS, SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC IMPACTS, LEGISLATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS. 2301 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 4140
EI Segundo, CA 90245
TEL 4:24-197- 1070 URL www kosmont com
96 Attachment C
Item No. 3
Office ot if,s
SQutli Gate City Clai'lc Cig of South Gate
MAY23 202% CITY COUNCIL
FI.-ED
10")Oaq
DepartmetgtHead.

AGENDA BT[LL
For tl'ie Regular Meeting of May 28, 2024
epartment: Comm Develo rnent
Meret{tth ELguira Rob Houston
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION REGARDING ZONING CODE

AMENDMF,NTS
PURPOSE: To take testimony and review evidence at the appeal heariitg, and decide whether to uphold the Planning Commission action, whether instead to reverse that action by resolving to modify the Zoning Code; or take otl'ier such action as niay be determined by the City Council.

RECOMMF,NDED ACTIONS: Following tl'ie conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Co'iutcil will consider:
a. Upl'iolding the actioii talcen by the Planning Commission at its Ap'iil 16, 2024, meeting, by adopting a Resolution attachedhereto;
b. Or, in the alternative, reversing the Planning Commission action by adopting a Resolution attached hereto, wMcli is a Resolution of Intent to adopt an ordinaiice amending the City's Zoning Code to remove certain restrictions on the size and location of warehouses in the City's Urban Mixed Use and Comnnercial Industrial zones; or
c. Take other such action as tlie City Cotincil may deterinine, FISCAL IMPACT: None
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: Advertising and notification of the public hearing for the appeal was conducted in compliance witli Chapter 11.50.020, Title 11 of tlie 8outl'i Gate Municipal Code. Notice of thehearingwasoriginallypostedandpriblisliedinthe"l,og,4nge!es Fave"newspaperandwasrnailedto stuarounding propeities on May 16, 2024,
ENVIRONMENTALEVALUATION: Upholdingtheactiontakenbytl'iePlanningCommissionwould not affect CEQA compliance Requirements. Adoption of a Resolution Categorically Exempt from CEQA for two reasons. First, amendment of a zoning code ordinance only constihites a "project" under CBQA if it has the potential for resulting in direct or indirect pliysical clianges to the enyironment, per 14 CCR § 15378, This proposed amendment will not cause physical changes to the environnnent, becarise it does not exempt future warehouse projects from Conditional Use Peru"iit aiid CBQA compliance requirements, The proposed mnendinent is therefore exenxpt from CEQA because it does not ineet the definition of a CEQAproject. Second,evenifitweretobedeemedaproject,ithasnopotentialforcausingasignificant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from CEQA prirsuant to 14 CCR 8315061. 35 AS13772.0860893 4873-9506-5022vl
97 BACKGROUND: At its re@'Jar meeting of April 16, 2024, the City Plani'iing Commission ("Cormission") held a public hearing to consider a Zone Cliange Amendinent. The Commission considered two resolutions regarding proposed changes to Cl'iapter 11.21 of the South Gate Zoning Code (wlffch is set foith iii Title 11 of tlie South Gate Mtu'iicipal Code). The first resolution, Resolution No, 2024-02A, if approved by the Comtnission, recormnended to the City Council ("Council') that tlie City's Zoning Code be revised to eliminate size limitations onwarehouses inthe City's' UrbanMixed-Use Zones and Comnnercial Industrial Zones, The second resolution, Resolution No. 2024-02B, if approved by the Commission, would direct the City's Community Development Depaitment staff ("Staff') to study tlie matter fiirther and return to the Conssioxt later with reconimendations, The Coinmission voted to deny bothresolutions.
.USTALYSIS: The Zoning Code, together with the City's General Plan, Specific Plans and Zoning Map, divides the City into various geographical use zones. Land use permission tables in Section 11.21.030 of the Zoning Code establish the uses to wMch land in each zone may be put, Table 11,21-3 specifies uses allowed in the Urban Mixed-Use Zones, and Table 11.21-4 specifies uses allowed iii tlie Commercial Industrial zones. Under those tables, warehousing is permitted (subject to issuance by the City of a Conditional Use Permit) iii the Industrial Flex (IF), Light Industrial (LF), Light Manufacturing (M2) and Heavy Manufacturing (M3) Zones. Howeveri footnote 18 in Table 11.21-3 and FOOtnOte 11 in Table

11.21-4, each limits the size andplacement of warehouses witliin tliose zones as follows:
"Limited to maxitnurn building area of fifteen thousaiid square feet and is not permitted along street frontage (would have to be a rear use)."
These footnotes were incorporated into the South Gate Municipal Code in 2015 wlien the Commission prepared, and the Council enacted, a compreliensive update to the Zoing Code. The Planning Commission and City Council at that tiine determiiied the inclusion of these footnotes was necessary to prevent a proliferation of large warehouses in the City which would cause detiimental impacts to the commrmity.

Recently, landowners and developers have expressed to the City's Coinmunity Development Department staff members (and in some cases to Planning Commissioners and to City Council Members) the landowners' and developers' opiiiions that the liinitations imposed by these footnotes are outdated, are tinduly restrictive, and create limitations inconsistent with tlie current business practices of the warehousing industry,
One such developer, Soutlx Gate Owner, LP, and its partners Soutli Gate GP, LLC and OMP South Gate GP LLC (collectively, "Appellant"), wliicli owns property in one of the affected zoixes, asked the Commission to recommend to this City Council that it amend the Zoning Code by eliminating tliose footnotes entirely. The Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to consider the matter on April 16, 2024. After considering presentations by tlie Comrt'nuiity Development Department and by the Appellant, and affer listening to public comments from Soutli Gate residents and business owners both supportiiig and opposixig the requested cliange, tlie Conmiission determined not to adopt a resolution recornrnending that this City Council amend the Zoning Code to remove those footnotes and the correslionding restrictions on the size aiid location of warehouses in the City ("Aprill6 Action"), The Appellant is appealing the Commission's April 16 Action and is aslcing the City Council to reverse it 36 AS13772.0860893 4873-9506-5022vl
98 by adopting a resolution of intent to pass an ordinance amending the Zoning Code to remove those footnotes and corresponding restrictions.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The two resolutions attached as exhibits to this Agenda Bill are mutually excJusive, sucli that oiy one, gid not both, should be adopted by this City Coiincil.

If, after considering tlie presentations and testimony presented at the heaiig, the City Council has not been persuaded tliat there is a need to modify the City's Zaoning Code to remove the current restrictions on the size and location ofwarehouses within tlie City, then the Council shoulduphold the Cossion's April 16 Action by adopting a Resolution.

But if, after considering the presentations and testimony presented at tl'ie hearing, tlie City Council has been persuaded that there is a need to modify tlie City's Zoning Code to remove the ctu'rent restiictions on the size and location of warehouses within the City, then the Council should reverse tl'ie Planning Commission's April 16 Action by adopting a Resolution, which is a Resolution of Intent to adopt Ordinance, modifying the City's Zoning Code to remove footnote No. 18 from Table 11.21-3 and to reinove footnote No. 11 from Table 11.21-4, Alteinatively, the City Council can take such other action as it may detemine, to provide guidance to City Staff.

ATTACHMENTS: A.

B,
Proposed Resolution upholding the Plaiuffng Commission action Proposed Resolution reversing the Planning Commission action and declatiztg an intent to adopt an ordiiiance modifying tl'ie City's Zoning Code to remove certain restrictions on wareho'iises.

Proposed Draft Ordinance
Planning Commission Agenda Bill, Apiil 16, 2024
Correspoi'idence Received for 04-16-24 PC
AppelIants Notice of Appeal Letter dated April 23, 2024 37 AS13772.0860893 4873-9506-5022vl
99 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCn, OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

GATE, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION TO REJECT PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES

AFFECTING THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF WAREHOUSES
WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Code, together with tlie City's General Plan, Specific Plans aiid Zoning Map, divides the City iiito various geographical use zones; and WHEREAS, land use peiatnission tables in Sectiori 11.21.030 of the Zoning Code establish the uses to which land in each zone may be put; and WHEREAS, Table 11,21-3 specifies uses allowed in the Urban Mixed-Use zones, and Table 11.21-4 specifies rises allowed in the Commercial Industrial zones; and WHEREAS, under those tables, warehousiiig is permitted (subject to issuance by the City of a Conditional Use Permit) in tl'ie Industrial Flex (IF), Liglit Industrial (LF), Liglit Manufacturing (M2) and Heavy Manufacturing (M3) zones; and WHEREAS, footnote 18 in Table 11.21-3 and Footnote 11 in Table 11,21-4 eacli liinits the size and placement of warehouses within tliose zones as follows:
"Limited to maximum building area of fifteen thousand square feet and is not permitted aloi'ig street frontage (wouldhave to be a rear use)." ; and WHEREAS, these footnotes were incorporated into the South Gate Municipal Code in 2015 when the Planning Commission prepared, and the Couricil enacted, a comprehensive update to tl'ie Zonii'xg Code, because the Planriing Cornrnissioners and City Council Members who were in office at that tiiue felt the inclusion of these footnotes was necessary to prevent a proliferation of large warel'iouses in the City which worild cause detrimental impacts to tlie coinmunity; and
WHEREAS, landowners and developers have recently expressed tlieir opinion that the limitations imposed by these footnotes are outdated, are unduly restrictive, and create limitations inconsistent witl'i tlie current business practices of the warehousing industry; and WHEREAS, one such developer, South Gate Owiier, LP, and its partners Soutli Gate GP, LLC and OMP Soutli Gate GP LLC (collectively, "Appellant"), which owns property in one of the affected zones, asked the Plaiu'iing Coission to recommend to this City Council that it ainend the Zoning Code by eliminating those footnotes entirely; and l
AS13772.0860893 4860-7602-2462v?
38 100
WHEREAS, the Planning Cominission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to consider tl'ie matter on April 16, 2024 and, after considering presentations by tlie Coimnunit5r Development Department and by the Applicant, and after listening to public coents from South Gate residents and business owners botl'i srippoiting and opposing tlie requested cliange, the Planning Comniission determined not to adopt a resolution recommending that this City Coru'icil amend tl'ie Zoning Code to remove those footnotes and the corresponding restrictions on the size and locatioii of warehouses in the City; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has appealed that Planning Comn'iission action and has asked tlie City Corincil to reverse it by adopting a resolution of intent to pass an ordii':iance amending the Zoning Code to remove those footnotes and corresponding restrictions; and WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that CEQA Guidelines, do not apply to the Project. Therefore, the proposed project is exempt from CBQA; WHEREAS, on May 28, 2024, this City Council conducted a duly-noticed public heatig to consider tltei matter, at which this Couiicil considered infornnation presented by the Con"irnunity Development Depmtment and by the AppIicant, and listened to public comments from Soutli Gate residents and business owners about the issue, Notice of the hearing was oiiginally posted aiid published in the "Los Angeles Wave" newspaper and was mailed to surrounding propeities on May 16, 2024;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE, CALIFORNIA, DOES B[EREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council does liereby declare tliat the above recitals are true and correct and incotporated herein by tlffs reference, SECTION 2. After consideting the information and comments presented at the May 28, 2024 City Council hearing on this matter, this City Council is not persuaded that there is a need to modify tlie City's zoning code to elin'iinate restrictions on the size arid placement of wareliouses in tlie City's Urban Mixed Use and Comnercial Industiial Zoi'ies by modifying Table 11.21-3 to remove footnote 18 from that table and by modifying Table 11.21-4 to remove footnote 11 from that table.

SECTION 3, The City Council hereby upholds the action taken by the Planning Commissio'ii on April 16, 2024 relative to this matter.

SECTION 4. Tlxe City Council liereby resolves NOT to make any changes to the Zoning Code to remove those footnotes from those tables or to otherwise Iimit or modify the restrictions on warehouse size and placement created by those footnotes.

SECTION 5. The City Cotncil does hereby declare that if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, pbrase or portion of this Resolution or its application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any coutt of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Resolution. The City Council hereby 2 AS13772.0860893 4860-7602-2462vl
39 101
declares that it would l'iave adopted this Resolution, aiid eacl'i and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or poition thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to wliether any poition of the Resolution would be declaiaed invalid or unconstitutional, SECTION 6. The City Clerlc shalI certify the adoption of this Resolution which shall be effective upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 28th day of May 2024.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

By:

Gil Huitado, Mayor
ATTEST:

B7:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVE 0 \tT
By:

Ranl F, Salinas, City Attorney
3 AS13772.0860893 4860-7602-2462vl
40 102
Attachment B
RESOLUTION NO.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THF, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOUTH GATE, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE

MODIFYING THE CITY'S ZONING CODE TO REIMOVE SIZE AND

LOCATION RESTRICTIONS ON WAREHOUSES IN THE CITY'S URBAN MIXED USE AND COMI]RCIAL INDUSTRIAL ZONES
WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Code, togetlier with the City's General Plan, Specific Plans and Zoi'iing Map, divides the City into various geographical use zones; and WHEREAS, land use permission tables in Section 11.21.030 of the Zonirig Code establish the rises to wliich land in eacli zone may be put; and WHEREAS, Table 11,21-3 specifies uses allowed in the Urban Mixed-Use zones, and Table 11.21-4 specifies uses allowed ii'i the Coimnercial Industrial zones; and WHEREAS, under tliose tables, warehousing is perinitted (subject to issuance by the City of a Conditional Use Permit) in the Indush'ial Flex (IF), Light Industrial (LF), Light Manufacturing (M2) and Heavy Manufacturing (M3) zones; and WHEREAS, footnote 18 in Table 11.21-3 arid Footnote 11 in Table 11,21-4 each limits the size andplacement of warehouses witliin those zones as follows:
"Limited to maximum building area of fifteen thousand square feet and is not permitted along street frontage (would liave to be a rear use)." ; and WHEREAS, these footnotes were incorporated into the Soutli Gate Muiiicipal Code iii 2015 when the Planning Commission prepared, and tlie Council enacted, a comprehensive update to the Zoniiig Code, becarise the Planning Commissioners and City Council Members who were in office at tl'iat time felt tlie inchision of these footnotes was necessary to prevent a proliferation of large warehouses in tlie City which would cause detrimental impacts to the coinmtuiity; and
WHEREAS, landowners and developers have recently expressed their opinion that tlie liniitations imposed by these footnotes are outdated, are unduly restictive, and create liinitations inconsistent with the current business practices of the wareliousing industry; and WHERF,AS, one sucli deyeiloper, South Gate Owner, LP, and its partners Soutli Gate GP, LLC and OMP South Gate GP LLC (conectively, "Appellant"), wlffch owns propeity in one of tlie affected zones, asked the Planiffng Co.inmission to recoinmend to this City Council that it amend the Zoning Code by eliminating those footnotes entirely; and 1 AS13772.0860893 4878-9628-5118v]
41 103
WHEREAS, the Planing Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to consider the matter on April 16, 2024 and, after considering presentations by the Community Development Depattment a+xdby the Applicant, and after listening to public comnxents from South Gate residents and business owners both supporting and opposing the requested change, tlie Planning Comtnission deter'ied not to adopt a resolution recommending tliat tliis City Cotuicil aniend the Zoning Code to remove those footnotes and the corresponding restrictions on tlie size and location of wareliorises in the City; and
WHEREAS, tlie Applicant lias appealed tl'iat Planning Commission action ai'id has asked the City Coincil to reverse it by adoptiiig a resolution of intent to pass an ordinance amending the Zoniiig Code to remove those footnotes and corresponding restrictions; and WHEREAS, the City Cou'i'icil does hereby find and deteri'nine that this project Categorically Exempt from CEQA, First, amendment of a zoning code ordinance only constitutes a "project" under CEQA if it lias the potential for resulting in direct or indirect physical cl'ianges to the environment, per 14 CCR rg 15378. This proposed amendment will not cause physical changes to the environment, because it does not exempt future warehouse projects from Conditional Use Permit and CEQA compliance requirements. The proposed amendment is therefore exempt from CEQA because it does not 'meet the definition of a CEQA project.

WHEREAS, onMay 28, 2024, this City Council conducted a d'itly-noticed public hearing to consider the matter, at which this Council considered information presented by the Community Developn'ient Depaitment and by the Applicant, and listened to public comn'ients from South Gate residents and business owners about the issue. Notice of tlie hearii"ig was originally posted ai'id published in the "Los Angeles Wave" newspaper and was mailed to surrounding propeities on May 16, 2024;
NOW, THEREFORE, THF, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOffH GATE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Tl'ieCityCouncildoesherebydeclarethattheaboverecitalsaretrueattdcorrect and inco-iporated herein by tlus reference.

SECTION2. AfterconsideringtheinfortnationandcommentspresentedattheMay28,2024 City Coui'icil heariiig ontbis matter, this City Council has determinedtliat there is a need to modify tl'ie City's Zoning Code to eliminate restrictions on the size and placement of warehouses in the City's Urban MixedUse and Commercial I'i"idustrial Zones by modifying Table 11.21-3 to remove footnote 18 from that table and by modifyiixg Table 11.21-4 toremove footnote 11 fromthat table, SECTION 3. Tlie City Council hereby declares its intent to introduce, at a future regularly scheduled City Council meeting the attacl'ied ordii'iance removing footnote 18 from Table 11.2'l-3 and by removirig footnote 11 from Table 11.21-4.

SECTION 4. Tlie City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice as required by law by causiiig a copy of this Resolution to be publislied in a newspaper of general circulation 2 AS13772.0860893 4878-9628-5118vl 42
104
within the City of South Gate and said publication to be compIeted not less tlian fifteen (15) days after tlie adoptioii ofthis Resolution,
SECTION 5, The City Council does hereby declare that if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, pbrase or portion of this Resolution or its application thereof is for ariy reason lield to be invalid or iu'iconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Resohition. Tlie City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, a'i'id eacli and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof not declared invalid or uncomtitutional withoutregard to wliether aiiy poition of tl'ie Resolution would be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. Tl'ie City Clerk sl'iall ceitify tlie adoption of this Resolution whicli shall be effective upon its adoption,
PASSED, APPROVED, andADOPTF,D on t's 28th day of May 2024, CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

B7:

Gil Hiutado, Mayor
ATTEST:

B7:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

B)7: DRAFT
Raul F. Salinas, City Attorney
3 AS13772.0860893 4878-9628-5118v) 43
105
Attachment C
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH GATE, CALIFORNtA, AMENDING TABLES 11.21-3
AND 11.21-4 0F THE SOUTH GATE MUNICIPAL CODE TO

REMOVE FOOTNOTES LIIVJITING SIZE OF WAREHOUSES
WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Code, together witli the City's General Plan, Specific Plans and Zoning Map, divides tl'ie city into various geograpliical use es; and WHEREAS, landuseperiuissiontables inSection
tlie uses to which land in each zone may be pxit; and WHEREAS, Table 11,21-3 specifies
Table l 1.21-4 specifies uses allowed in the
WHEREAS, under those tables,
of a Conditional Use Peimit) inthe Industrial Flex (M2) and Heavy Manufacturing es; and
30 oftheZoning Code establisli
Mixed-Use zones, and
a and
(subi
a (LF),
by the city
Manufacturing
WHEREAS, footnote 18 in e
theisizeai'idplacementofwareliouses th
11 in Table 11.21-4 each limits
be a
square feet and is not
)."; and
remoye
consi
NOW,
CALIFO
SECTIO
footnote 18.
the a it to be in the liest interest of the City to '!'lli)Iorder to give tlie City greater flexibility in
liereafter be proposed in tlie City;

UNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE,
AS WS:
-3 of the City's Zoning Code is liereby ainended to remove SECTION 2. T
footnote 11.
,21-4 of the City's Zoning Code is liereby ainended to remove SECTION3, IfanySection,sentence,clause,orpbraseofthisOrdinanceisforanyreason held to be invalid or rinconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decisionshallnotaffecttheyalidityoftheremainingportionsofthisordinance. TheCityCo'incil liereby declares that it wot'ild have passed this Ordinance, and each and every Section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared iixvalid or unconstitutional.

AS13772.0860893 4883-9599-7886vl 44
106
SECTION 4. Tliis Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 5, The City Clerk sliall certify to the adoption ofthis Ordinance arid shall cause a col:iy of the same to be publisl'ied in a mani'ier prescribed by law, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED tlffs day of , 2022
ct'ry
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS
AS13772.0860893 4883-9599-7886vl 45
107
Attachment D
Ciffl of South Gate
PI,ANNING COI!IM[SSION
A(SENIa)A IBT[T[,T[,
For the Regular Meetiiig of: April 16, 2024
Coixtract Plariner: Commutd@ DevelopinentDirector:
aulaKe Mere
SUBJECTi AMENDINGTHF,CITY'SZONINGCODEBYMODIFYINGTITLF,11,CHAPTF,R11.21 OF THE SOUffi GATE MUNICIPAL CODE TO RELAX OR REMOVE RESTRICTION8 0N THE, 8IZ'E OF WAREH:OUSE8 ATTTHOJ?TZED IN THIE CffY=S URBAN .MIXED USE ZONES AND

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL ZONES
PURPOSE; To consider two alternate resolutions regarding proposed changes to Chapter 11.21 of the Sout]i Gate Zoning Code (which is set forth in Title II of tbe South Gate Municipal Code), The first resolution, if approved by thePlanning Cominission ("Coi'nmission"), would beto recommend to tlie City Council ("Council>) that the C'ity's Zoning Code be revised to eliniinate size limitations on warehouses iri tlie City's' Urban Mixed tJse Zones and Commercial Industrial Zones. Tlie second resolution, if' approved by the Commission, would direct tbe City'g Community DevelopmentDepaztnent staff("Staff') to study the :lnatter further and returll tO the Coinmission at a later date witli recommendations, The resolutions ate intended to be alternative approaches to the issue and ha've been written with the intention tliat the Commission can approve either resolution but should not approve both. The Commission also has the option of not approvirxg eitlier of the two resolutions, which wouldeffectivcly signify the Commission's desire that the Zoiiiiig Code not be amended.

At the request of tlie Applicaiit, tliis item wus contixiued from the Planning Commission meeting ori March 5, 2024,
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recomtnends thatthe Commission talce the following actions:
a, CONDUCT apublic liearinB;
b, ACCEPT the deterrniiiation that the adoption of Resohttion No. 2024-02A is exempt from tlie California Environtnental Quality Aot ("CEQA"), codified at Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq.:), pursuaiit to Public Resources Code F§ 21080,17, artd that tlie adoption of Resolution No, 2024-02B is "categorically exempt" from CEQA under tlxe regulatory guidelines establishcd under CBQA ("CEQA Guidefines"), codified at CJiapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code ofRegulations ("CCR"), as a Class 6 exemption(Information Collection) under 14 CCR. § 15306 atd is also "statirtorily exempt" from CEQA under aie Feasibility and Planniiig Studies exemption establi,slied by the CEQA Guidelines at 14 CCR § 15262;
c, DISAPPROVE,ANDDONOTADOPT,ResolutionNo,2024-02A5whiohresolutionrecoinmendsthe immediate removal of size restrictioi'is for warehouses iri the City's Urbait Mixed Use Zoi'ies at'id Cotnmercial hidustrial Zoxies,
d. TAKE ACTJON ON Resohttioii No, 2024-02B by either approving and adopting or disapproving and clioosiiig not to adopt that resolution. Staff has i'io preference or recon'mieiidation as to the approval or l
A813772.0'86C)R93 48!10-7!X)2-6343vI
46 108
disa,pproval of Resolution No. 2024-02B, except that if the Cominission approves and adopts Resolution No, 2024-02A, then Staff recommends disapproving and notadopting ResolutionNo, 2024-02B, PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: Adveitising and notification of the public lieaiing foh this item was conducted in compliance with South Gate Municipal Code Sections 11.50,020 and 11.50,030, Notice of the hearing was originallypostedaixdpublisliedinthe "SouthGatePress"onFe:bxuuy24,2.024, Tlle original pllblit:' l'rearing Was 8Cheduled far March 5, 2024, Since, at tlle request Ofthe AppliOit, tile publiC heating was continued at tbe March 5'h meeting to a "date certain" (April I(,(li)i nO additional public notice is required, aside from that described in the above paraBrapli.

ENVIRONMENTAL FX'ALUATION: Adoption of Resolutiori No, 2024-02A is exempt from CEQA for two reasons, First, amendtnent of a zoning code ordina'i'ice only constitutes a "project" under CEQA if it has the potential for resulting in direct or indirect I:ihysical clianBes to the enviroiunent, per 14 CCR J§ 15378, Tliis proposed amendment will i'iot cause physical chaiiges to the environu'rient, because it does not exempt future watehouseprojectsfromConditionalUsePerrnitandCBQAcompliancerequirernents. Theproposedamendment is therefore exempt from CEQA because it does not nieet the definiiion of a CEQA project. Second, even if it were to be deemed a project, it has no potentia! forcausing asignificmit effect onthe envimnment and is therefore exemptfrom CEQA pursuanttol4 CCR f:ll506i
Adoption of Resolution No. 2024-02B is also exempt from CEQA for two reasons. First, it is categorically exempt from CBQA as a Class 6 exemption tuider 14 CCR § f5306. Class 6 exempts activities mrisimng of "basic clata collection, resesch, experimental .inanagement, aiidresource evaluationactivities whichdo notresult in a serious or major disturbance to an enviroi'u'nental resource, These may be strictly for information gatheiing purposes, or as part of a study {cading to an action yhich a public agency has not yet approved, adopted, or tunded." Second, it is also statutorily exempt from CEQA as Feasibility and Planning Studies under the CBQA Guidelines at 14 CCR F§ 15262. That exemption exennpts projects "iiivolving only feasibility orplaiming studies for liossible futute actions which the agency, board, or cointnission has not approved, adopted, or Ainded does not reqttire the preparation of an EIR or r>egative declaration but does xequire consideration of enviroerital factors."
IIACI(GROUND: The ZoninB Code, together with the City's General Plan, Specific Plans and Zoning Map, divides the City into various geographical use zones. I,and use perinission tables in Section 11,2'L.030 of the Zoui.rzg Code establish the> uses to whicli laiid in eacli zone ynay be put, Table 11.21-3 spe,cif'xeis uses allowed in theUrbanMixed-Usezones,aitdTable[I,2I-4specLfiesusesallowdintheCotntnercialIndustrialzones. Under those tables, warel'iousixtg is permitted (subject to issuance by the City of a Conditional Use Permit) in the hidustrial Fiex (IF), Light Industrial (LF), Light Manufacturirxg (M2) atxd Heavy Manufacturing (M3) zones, I-l:owever, footnote 18 in Table 11.21-3 and Footnote I[ I in Table 11,21-4 each limits tJhe size and placement of warehouses witliin those zones as follows:
'r,imited to maximitn buiiding area of fifteen thousiuid sqxiare feet and is not permitted along street frontage (would liave to be arear use)."
These footnotes were :uxcorporated into the Soutb Gate Municipal Code in 2015 wlien the Coinn'iissioxi and Council coltegively adop'te,d a comprehensive update to the Zoniiyg Code, Tl'ie Platining Commissioners aiid City Council Members wlto were in office at that time felt the inclusion of these footnotes was necessary to preveait a 2 A8U772,0860893 4880-790A6343vl
47 109
proliferation of large warehouses in the City which would cause detrimental impacts to the cornm'tuxity, Recently, landowners and developers have expressed to Staff (aiid iit some cases to Plaiiiiing Commissioners and to City Cotincil Members) the Iandowners' and developers' opinions tliat tliei Iiiitatio'ns imposed by these footnotes are oyitdated, are unduly restiotiye, and create limitations inconsistent with tlie current business practices of the wareliousixig industiy, They have aslced the City to consider eliminating the footnotes entirely, or atleast modifying them to loosen therestrictions and allowthe construction and operation of Jar@erwarehouses in the City,
ANALYSIS:

In response to those requests, Staff is presenting to the Conssion two separate resolutions. Resolution No. 2024-02A, if adopted by the Commission, would recoinrnend to the City Council that the Zoning Code be atnei'idedtodeletethosefootnotesfromthelandusepeirmissiontables, ResolutionNo,2024-02B,ifadoptedby the Commission, would direct 8taffto evaLt'iatethe effects ofmodifying or entireiy elirninating thefootnotes, StaffdoesnotrecoendtheadoptionofResolutionNo,2024-02A, Deletionofthesubjectfootrxotesfromthe ZorffngCodewouldeliminatethel5,000squarefootsizerestrictionaliplicabletowarehousesiutlieCity, Absent tliat restriction, the only limitations on warehouse size would be those generally applicable to other biildings in the respective zones imposed by things such as setback requirements, height limtations, and floor-area-rado requiremeaits, This will undoubtedly lead to the consttuction of warehouses in tlie City which are xnuch larger thantliosecurrentlyfoundintlieCity. }Vithout:htherstudyorotberlimitations,Staffisuiabletopredict-or advise the Cotnrnission [18 to -ttte effects such larger warehouses might have on traffic, intrastructure, noise and ot]'ier matters important to residents of the City.

Resolution No, 2024-02B is presented as an altetnative to Resolution No. 2024-02A. Rather tlian ResolutionNo, 2024-(12A"s "a!l or notliing" approacli of elitninating or tetaining the curyent restrictions on warebouge size and locationrestrictions, Resolution No, 2024-02B provides an oppoztunity for Staff to evaluate whether and to wl'iat extent those restiictions should be eliminated, modified or retained, Resolution No. 2024-02B would allow Staff toreturn to tlie Commission at a later date vvith an analysis of beinefits and detriments ofmodifying or clirnimting tliose restrictions, as well as wliether additionaldevelopment standards or operating practices should be imposed in connection with the constructioii and operation of larger warehouses, In this way, the Cotnmtssion can malce amore informed decision,
CONCLUSION: If the Commission believes the tutrent restrictions 011 warehouse size Hd 10(;31i@H ByB unreasonabte aiid should be changed, Staff recomtnends adopting Resolutioii No, 2024-02B but not Resolution No, 2024-02A, If the Comtnission believes the current restrictions a.te reasonable, Staff recommends tltat both resolutioiis be disapptoved and neither be adopted.

ATTACHMENT8. A. ResohttionNo. 2024-02A
B, Resolution No, 2024-02B
C. SGMC, Section 11,21.030, Tables 11.21-3 and 11,21-4
3 AS13772.0860893 4880-7902-6343vl
48 110
RESOLUTION N0. 2024-02A

A RISOLUTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Rli:COMMENDING THAT T:EIE SOUTH GATE CITY

COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING
SECTION 11.21.030 0F THE SOUTH GATE MUNICIPAL
CODE TO REMm7E CERTAIN 8IZE AND LOCA'nON
RE8TRICTIONS ON WAREHOUSE US:tS
WHEREAS, Land Use Permission Tables 11,21-3 aiid 21,21-4, which are located in Section 11,21,030 of the South Gate Muiicipal Code, allowwareliouseuses in the City's Industrial Flex (IF), Light Industrial ([,I), Light Manufacturing (M2) arirl Heavy Maixufacturing (M3) zoiies; and,
WHERRAS, footnote 18 of Take 11,21-3 and footnotell of Table 11,21-4 eacli limitthe size ofwarehouses to 15,000 square feet and limit the location ofwarehouses to the rear of the lot rather thaix on the street front; and,
WHERF,AS, tlie owners ofcertainparcels ofpropeiaty intliose zones, as well as developers wishing to develop warehouses in those zones, have, contended that the restrictions established by those footnotes m:e inreasonable and should be eliminated in order to allow tlie construction and use within the City ofwareliouses larger than 15,000 square feet; and, WHiRF,AS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65854, the Plaru% Commission duly noticed apublic hearing and conducted the public liearing on April 16, 2024, to deterniine whether tbe Planning Commission should adopt a resolution recoxutnending that the City Council amend Section 11.21.030 of the South Gate Mtuxicipal Code to remove footnote 18 froin Table 11.21-3 and to remove footnote I l from Table 1 1.21-4; arid, WHEREAS, after listenlrig to testimony of petsons attending the hearing, and taeceiving otl'ier information from members of the City's Coi'ntinity Developnient Depaitment, a tnajority of the Planning Commssioners have determined that the Municipal Code should be amended to z(5BI(iy5 those footnotes from those tables;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COIl%'mn8SION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GAI% CALIFORNJA, }JEREBY RE80LVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTIONI. ThePlanningCommissionfindsthatalloftbefactssetfortl'xintheRecitals of tliis Resolution are t'rue and correct,
SE(mON 2, Tl'xe Plamxing Contmission hereby finds and determiixes that the City Couricil's adoption Ofan ordinance amending S(ictioxxll,21,030 oftlie South GateMunicipal Code to remove thefootnotes fromtlie tal:iles as discussedaliovewould be exempt from therequirements of tl'ie Califoritia Enviroxiinent Quality Act ("CBQA") fo.r two reasons, First, ainendment of a zoning code ordinance oiily conmitutes a "project" under CEQA if it lias the potential forresulting in direct or indirect pliysical changes to tlie enviroiurient, per 14 CCR FB 15378. Tins proposed l
AS13772.0860893 4862-2711-7480vl
49 111
amendment will not carise physical changes to the environmettt, because it does not exenapt future warehouse projects front Conditional Use Permit arid CBQA compliaiice requireiments, The proposed amendment is tberefore exemptfrom CEQA because it does not meet the definition of a CBQA project. Second, even if it were to be deemed a project, it has no poteritial for causing a significant effect on the enironmerit and is therefoi:e exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR f?3 15061,
SECTION 3. Such an ordinatice would be consistent witli and support the General Plan, SF,CTION 4, Such an ordinance would not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare of the City and would protect public healtli, safety, andwelfare intlie City.

SECT10N5. ThePlanniiigCoinrnissionherebyrecomtnendsthattheCityCounciladopt an ordinai':ice tevising Section 11,21,030 ofthe South Gate Municipal Codeto remove footnote 1 8 from Table 11.21-3 and to retnove footnote 11 from Table 11,21-4, ' SECTION 6. Tlie Secreta7 of the Plantffng Con'mission shall ceitify to the adoption of this Resolution,
SF/CTION7. TheSecreta7ofthisComttiissionbedirectedtotrax>smittotheCityCouncil a copy of this resolution as the report of the findings mad recommendations of the Planning Commissioii with reference to this matter.
[continues to tiext page]
2 AS13772.086DR93 4862-2711-748(lv!
50 112
This recommendation was adopted by the following vote at tl'ie Planning Commission nieeting of April 16, 2024.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT!
NOT VOTING:

APPROVED andADOPTED is 16" day of April, 2024.
ram..

M'eidiJ '/
Secretary
City Plaiiing Commission
APPROVF,D:

Jimmy Ozaeta
Cliairperson
City Planing Coxruission
3 AS13772,0860893 4)162-2711-7480vl
51 113
RESOLTJTION N0. 2024-02B

A RESOLUTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
DIRECTING ST AFF TO STUDY THE ADVISABILITY 01?'
AMENDING SECTION IL21,030 0F THE SOUTH GATE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY OR :umovg CP,RTAIN
SIZE ANJ) LOCATION RESTRICTION8 0N WAREI-IOUSF,
USES
WHFiREAS, Land Use Permission Tables 11,21-3 and 11,21-4, whicb are located in Sectionll.21.030 oftheSoutliGateMunicipalCode, allowwarehouseusesintheCity'slndumrial Flex (IF), Liglit Industrial (LF), LightManufacturing (M2) and Heavy Manufacturing (M3) zoneB; and,
WHEREAS,footnote 18ofTabie 11.21-3andfootnote 11 ofTablell.21-4eacl'ilimitthe Size OfWarehouSeS tO 15,000 Square feet and limit the 10CatiOll OfwarehOuSeS tO the rear Ofthe 10t rather than on the street ft:ont; and,
WHEREAS, llie owners of certainparcels ofproperty inthosezones, as well as developers wisbing to deveJop wareliouses in tliose zones, have contetided that the restrictions establisl'isd by those footnotes are uueasonabfe azxd should be eliminated in order to allow the construction and use within tl'ie City of wareliouses largerthan 15,000 square feet; axxd, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Go'vernmeirit Code Section 65854, the Planning Coinmision duly rioticed a public hcaring on March 5, 2024, to determine wbetherthe Planning Commission should adopt a resolution reconimending that the City Council antend Section 1L'21,030 of the South Gate Muxiicipal Code to remove foohiote 18 from Table 11,21-3 and to remove footnote 11 from Table I1,21-4. At tlie request of' the Applica+tt, the public heaiainB was net opened On Marcli 5, 2024 arid the itenl WaS mOVed tO the Planning Commission heal'ing Of Apxil 'L6, 2024; aiid,
W-JEREAS, at the April 16, 2024 pubfic heaioirig, after listening to testimony of persons attendiiig the hearing, and receiving other ii'ifomiation from membe,rs of the City's Community Development Department, a majority of the Planning Commissioners have detetmined that they need more inforrnation as to the possible impacts of sucli an ainendtnent to the Mxu'iicipaI Code before the Planiiing Commission can make such a recomtnendation; NOW, Illt!;RKIIORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE, CALIFORNIA, HERF,BY IISOLVF,S AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION i. Tlie Planning Commission finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals of tliis Resolution aic true and corrcct.

SECTiON 2. The Planniiig Commission hereby finds and determines that a request by the P]aiming Comniission for the 'inembers of the City's Community Development Departmettt to obtain axid provide additional inforination to the Plang Commission as to the possible effects I
AS13772.0860893 4874-0041-1304vl
52 114
of revising Section 11.21.030 of the South Gate Municipal Code to remove the footaotes from the tabies as discussed alzove would be exetnpt froni the requirements of tbe California Emirorhent Quality Act ("CEQA"), under the Class 6 categorical exemption provided by 14 CCR FB 15306, and would also be exempt from CBQA under the statutory exemption for Feasibiiity and Plani'iing Studies provided by 14 CCR § 15262.

SECTION 3. The Plaxining Comniission hereby ii'istructs the staff of the Community Development Departmentto retumto tlie Comtnission at a date in the near future with an analysis of (i) tl'ie benefits and detrirnents of modifying or eliminating tlie restrictiom on wareliouse size and location imposed by footnote 18 of Table 11,21-3 and footnote 11 from Table 11,21-4 of Section 11.21.030 of tlie South Gate Muiiicipal Code, ay'id (ii) whetlier additional development dard:q or operating pmctices should be imposed iii coririection with the construction and operation of iarger wareliouses,
SECTION 4. Tl'ie Secretary of the Planning Cornrnission shall certify to the adoption of tliis Resolt'ition.

This recommeridatioti was adopted by the following vote atthe Planning Cotnmission meieting of April 16, 2024,
AYES:

NOE8:

ABSENT:

NOT VOTING:

APPROVF,D and ADOPTED this 16'l1 day of April, 2024. 8ecrdxy
City Planning Commission
APPROVED:

Jirnrny Ozaeta
Chairperson
City P[aiuiing Commission
2 AS13772.086089:) 4874-004(-1304vl
53 115
Attachment E

C UDA H Y -
01)EN MINDS, Cl)EN DOOI2S
Incorporated November 20, 1960
5220 Santa Ana Street
Cudahy, CA 90201
Phone: {323) 773-5143
Fax: <323} 771-2072
www.cityofcudahy.com
llhm
losalli(ionitlez
Vku Mayor
FlliahelhAlmhix+
Onontllmmbsr
Dnkvlsim
couhtllmembai
tMillnll. Tuinvi
Ciiuiidmaibbv
cypthb(,imtloLl&!l
a§ Manq*i
Alfllnto Nml?, ICMII-CM
April 16, 2024
City of South Gate
Community Development Department
8650 Californio Ayenue
South Gate, CA 90280
RE: PLANNING COMMI88ION APRIL 16, 2024 MEF,TING - ITBM#2 To Whom itMay Concern:

This letter is submitted by the City of Cudahy (Cudaliy) in response to :[tem #2 of the April 16, 2024 Planning Commission agendawliich contains two resolutioris that propose to either (I) remove a size restriction for warehouses in Chapter 1[.21 of the South Gate Muntcipal Code ('(SGMC") throughtlie adoption of aii ordinance (Resolution No. 2024- 02A);or(2)directstafftostudytheissuefurther(ResolutionNo.2024-02B). Theadoption ofResolution No, 2024-02A would recommend to the City Council the adoption of a proposed ordinance that would eliminate the size limitations inthe City's Urban Mtxed Use Zones and Commet'cial Industrial Zones. This would include:
* Light Manufacturing (M2) Zone
* Heavy Manufacturing (M3) Zoi'ie
* Industrial Flex gF) Zone
"I'he proposed ordinance is inconsistent with tlie Cityas (ieneral Plari which aims to reduce, limit, axid evetx pliase ocit indust'rial uses wit the City in order to provide more diversejob opporhinities axid create more vibrantcommunities that present opportunities for more open space, recreation, and pedestrian activity, Additionally, the proposed ordinancc would increaselhe reasonably foreseeable environinental impacts (noise, yibration, air pollution, high levels of tmck traffic) associated with warehousing and distribution uses, which have not been analyzed pursuantto CEQA.

I. Incoxisistencywith tlie General Plan
Pa@ejl
54 116
Tlie proposed ordixxance is inconsistent with tlie General Plan, iriclusive ofthe Comn'iunity Design Element which recognizes that "tbe City has a large number of industrial uses [and] there is a lack ofa diversity of other job-producing uses, namely office atid taesearch and deve[opment uses [tJiatl could lielp diversify the economy and advaiice tlieeconomic position of city raqidents,'
In order to provide a higlier diversity of employment opportunities, the General Plan also seeks to transfoitn the City's "wide variety of industrial, warehouse and distribution areas,.,to allowforhigherintensity,jobproducinguses, Desirednewusesincludeanexpansionoftlie ligtt industrial/flex condominium-style development that builds on and supports the boutiqcie labeication industy cirtently present in the City, office uses arid research and devetopment rises[]"2 but does riot suppoit the proliferation of warehousiiig uses.

A. GerieralPlanNeighborhoodDesiBnatioti
Several of the City's Commercial Industrial and Urban Mixed Use Zones, as shown in Figure 1, below are also designated in the General Plan as Neighborhood Overlay Corridors. "The General Plan seeks to trat'isfottn Corridors from the features that divide tlie community into areas tliat bring people together. Corridors shou[d be atiractive, contain a diverse mix of uses - including residenttaJ uses than currently exist- provide safetavel for pedestrians, bicycles, transit vehicles arid automobiles, and enable people and goods to circulate with rela(ive ease," Figure 1. Neighborhood Overlay Corridors"
' Cite orSOufll Cal, General Plait 2035 - COmmllllity DesiffliElement ("COmrnllhity Dei91Bn Blenient), p. 48. 2 Coinmiinity Design Blenient, p. 52.
3 Commtmlty Design Element, p, 59.

Pegel2
55 117
By allowitig ware)iouses to enjoy an unlimited size, the negative itnpacts associated with warehousing uses would proliferatei intensifyi and would discourage a diversity ofuses citywide, B. General Plari Place/Tape hltellBity LirnitaliOnS for Mallufacttting/D!8trib!ltlOll The General Plan's Mai'iufacturmg/Distribution Place/Type designatton permits large- scale warehouse, distributiori and logistics facilities, but limits the intensity of such uses up to 2,0 FAR,aixduptofourstories, AllowiriBanunlimitedsizeforwarehouseswouldbecontarytothe City's own General Plan.

C, Applicable General Plan Policies
The proposed ordinance would also be inconsistent with the following General Plan objectives, goals, and policies:
o ObjectiveCD2.4:Providelandforadiversilyofjobproducingusesthroughoutthe City.
o P,3 : The City should not great}y expand the amount of land for Manufacturing/Distribution uses, Existing manufacturing and distribution uses may remain in their current Iocatiotm and corrfigura(ions, and may expand their currerit operations,
* ObjectiveCD8.4:ReducethetmpactofManufacturing/DistributionandLight Industrial/Flex busiriesses on adjoiriitig land uses, o P,I: Neighborhoodssliouldbeprotectedfeomiiicompatiblenon<esidentialuses and disniptive traffic and otherrioise generat'tng uses to tlie greatestextent feasible,
o P,2: The consideration and mitigation of noise, light, vehicular a+td other impact on residetttial properties will be eonsideredwhen Manufacturing/Distribution or LightIndustrial/Flax are ptoposed,
o P,3:Bxistirig,non-confoti'ningindus(rialusesshouldbephasedoutduririgthe course of the General Plan.
o P.4: The City will not permit exisfing, non-coiiforming industrial uses to stgnificantly expand their facilities exceptto rectify buildirig code yiolutioiis arid inaintain the appearance of the buildirig.
o P.5: Industrial uses shorild be regulated to tninimize smoke, pollution, glare, ex.cessive noise and other adverse impact on employees andotx adjoining uses and areas+
o P.9:TheCitywilllimitthedevelopmentofindustrialandotherusesthatuse, store, produce ortransport toxic substances, generate tinacceiptable levels of iiotse or air pollution or produce otherpollutants. The City will require adequate mitigation measures, confirmed by environmental review and monitoring, for all such uses that are developed,
II. Failxire to Comply witlt CEQA's Reqtiirements
Page l 3
56 118
CEQA requires an analysis of a project's reasotiaL+ly foreseeabIe directaitd indirect environmerital impacts, Staff%aat'ialysis and conclusions re(3arding the determination that Resolution No, 2024-02A does not constitute a "project" pursuant to CEQA is incorrect as a iriotteroflawandasamatteroffact, Staffconchidesthatan"aipendmeritofazoningcode ordinance only constitcites a 'project' ui'ider CEQA if it has tlie potential for resulting in direct and ii'idirect physica( changes to the eiivironment, perl4 CCR § 15378," In fact, zoriing ordinances are within CEQA's purview when they have a reasonably foreseeable dtrect or indirect physical chaiige to the environment." As discussed in further detail below, the proposed ordinance cotistitutes a "project" for the purposes of CEQA.

Zoning ordinances are subject to the tlireshokl question of whethert]ie City's proposed actionwouldhaveareasonablyforeseeableindjrectphysicalchangeintheenvironment.5 While Resolution No, 2024-02Aconcludes that "even if[theproposed ordiiiance] were deemeda project, it has no potential for causing a significant effect[,]" the statement is not suppotted by anyevidcnceinthereeord, Bystaff%ownanalysis,theremovalofthesizerequirementfor warehouses would "undoubtedly lead to the construction of warehouses in tl'ie City which are much larger than those currently found iit the City. Without t'urther study or other lii'nitations, Staff is tinable to predict or advise the Commissiori as to - the effects sucli larger warehouses might have ontraffic, infragtnicture, noise and other matters important to residents ofthe City."6 This statement ditectly contradicts its OWl'l concIusion, Tlie City must analyze these reasonably foreseeable impacts w)iiclt ate aIso weIl documented.

The City's own Gerieral Plan recognizes the negative impacts associated with industrial tses, including:
* close proximity of industrial uses to sotne tesidenttal areas; 7 ffl ' locations where industria! uses are located ori parcels designated for residential uses;8 * buiMngs that are in disrepair;9
s high levels of truclc traffic on City streets; 'o * heavytrucktra&;"
* noise; xv
* air pollution;13
4 Pub. lies, Code (J 21065, 21080; see also CEQA Guidelines § 1537$)(1), 5 Pub. Res. Code (l 21065; Union ofMedh:al MarfJunnaPatlents, )nc. v City ofSan Die@ (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1?71, 1198 ("Ub&ff' v. S(/TI Diego").
a City of South Gate, Pla;ii>ig Commtssion 8taffRepoit ("Staff Report"), p, 3 (Api:ill6, 2024) Avallab)o at: a9f33baO-4d60- 4451-iid94-63!afoOf26e-4b902e70-9buc-4ebO-a842-mtidf6af'e394-17 12679909.pdf (d3n9y02raazmpg.oloudfront.nqjl. 7 Comntuiiity Design Element,p. 48.
a Community Design Element, p, 48,
9 Cmnmunity Destgn Iilement, p, 48,
'o Commuiilty DesJgri Eleineiit, p. 48.
" Coiniiiunlty Di,a{gnE]ament,p. 76,
" Cotniniinlty DegiHnE)ament, p. 76.
'] Community Design Elemeiit, p, 76,
Pa@el4
57 119
* indiract{mpactsfromhighlevelsoftrafflc,inqludii'igairpolli,ition,roadway congestion, damagp to infrastructure, and ne;ga'tive healtli in'ipacts,14 8ueliimpacts would be feLtthroughouttlie City atid by xe:sideritswlio live dixeictly norm of vlmge wareliousing p.roject proposed at 5037 P=tata Street, The fact th'at any subsequent pr6jeats would be subjectto fi 6onditional use pemltis rrxblevaiit. in a.wbn'v. sarr rrtegoi the courtheld it i6 eriough forthei activity to be "capa!'le of cauSihg R digest orreasonal;ily foreseeable i:ridirectphysiql cliange inthe envir6ni'nent [Wilhollt regard tol tM epecific 6ireutnatances in whlch the proposed qcti$ will be @tried out,"lS 8imilarto the facts before youtoday, tn UMMP v, SaADiego, staff concluded that a'zoning ordiqance tbat regulated taiuiabis activities was exempt fiaom CEQA b6qause subsequent site- speoific'pfoJects'would lie sabject to a conditionaiuse pHmit od iinpacts would be eval:uat6d on aoase-by-casebasis,16 Similar!y,staff'smialysisforR,asolution2024-02Astatesthatitisaot subject to CEQA because 4'it does notexempt future warefiougeiprojects from CoridtUonal Use Permits and CBQA compJiancereqgisments,"" The c(iurthas rejected such conclusog Stat6nletltS wh6nthe3r are not supported by substantial evidence, rulingtiiat "alocal agency 4CaltnOt argue' that approvalaregulation is not a projeict 'riierely becausefurtherdecisions must be made' before the activides directty causJng en*onmental chance will oceur...l:and the preposedreguLation] requires the City to treat it as a prqieat and proceed withthe next steps of tlleCEQAanal7SiS.a"" TheCityhasnotctmductedanyenvtro',entalanalysispursuantto CBQA, andsuch analysls mustbe co4eted priorto adopting,any su6hordinance, III. (>.neluqion
We w(ye the PlaiminB Commitisionto roject bothresolutio4s onthe premise thatboth proposalsateinconsistentwiththeCity)sGeneralPlan, Fuither,theproposedordiuancethat would elimnate ate restrictions for warehouses would violate CEQA'srequirements without any furtber review.

Sinceteily,
CJff'OF CUDAI-IY
Development Director
'4 City ofSoutlrGatc, Gotiiiriil Plan 2035-Ecoiiomlc DevalripmentElemant ("Econoniic Development Element!'), p. 223, '5 Id. atp. 1197,
'a Id. at p. 1200,
fi 8taffRaport, p. 2.
kB Id,
Pace j5
58 120
CC: Alfonso Noyola, City Manager, City of Cudaliy
Honorable Daigy Lomeli, Corincil Member, City of Cudahy Honorable Josa R. Gonzalez, Mayor, City of Cudahy
HonoyabLe Elizabeth Alcantar, Vice Mayor, City of Cudalxy Honorable Martin U, Fuentes, Council Member, City of Cudahy Honorable Ed, Cyntbia Gonzalez, Couricil Member, City ofCudaliy Stephanie Areclnga, City Attorney, City of Cudahy CeciliaMadrigal-Gonzalez, SeniorPlanner, City ofCudahy ffonotable Maria del Pilar AValos, Mayor, City of Soutli Gate Honorable Gil Hurtado, Vice Mayor, City of South Gate
Honotable Maria Davila, Counci[ Member, City of South Gate Honorable Al R!os, Council Member, City of South Gate I-Ionorable Joshua Baron, Council Member, City of'South Gate Jimmy Ozaeta, Cltairpersoi'i, South Gate Planiiing Commissiorx Jovanna Laborin, Vice Chairperson, South Gate Planning Commission Ivy Duatte, Commissiorier, South GatePianriingCommtssion
Jose Delgado, Coinmissioner, South Gate Planning Commission DaisyPrieto, Commissioner, Soutli Gate Planning Commissioii Rob Houston, City Manager, City of South Oate
Raul Salinas, City Attorney, City of South Gate
Meredith Elgutra, Community Development Director, City ofSouth Gate 59 Pagel6
121
Esther Washinpton
Frorri:

Sent
To:

Subject
Mario Dominguez, Jr. <majorblood80@gmai]-com>
Monday, Apri! 3 5, 2024 5:49 AM
Meredrth E!guira; Esther Washington
Fwd: Public Comment For April 16th 2024 P(anning Commission Meeting is message is t-rom ari EXT'ERNAL SENDER - be CAUTIo[Js, particu(arly with [inks an6 aichments [ made the nnistake OT t5/prng up an emeil With m'y' pubLiC commEint far item 2 ofTUesday's Ptannin& Commission meeting. l/Vith rn'/ capta?ncaveman email. So ['m now sendingittoyou with my majorblood emaiL. PLease read the message heLow ----- Forwarded message --
From: Mario Dominguez, Jr. ccaptsincavemanl [email protected]> Date: Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:35 AM
Subject Fwd: Public Comment ForApril 1 6th 2024 Ptann?ng Commission Meeting To: <majorbloodBO@gmaiL,com>
If RObert "Mr- MLISSOLini" Mom8[VO ShOW8 up at the Ptann?ng COmmiSision meeting, l aSktha'i '}Ou pLeaSe read thiS emaiLduring f.he pLibl'ic comment portion for item 2. 'Mr. Musso(ini" put a restraining order against me. So ?j he's present forthe meet'ing. That means it! hgve to teave.Yeah, )don'twamtor?skgettrngarrestedorberngcaughtforviotatingthe.restrainingorderjudHementagainstme-Now!'rnparanoid thatthe bastard will ratfuck me again- Thankyou,
- - Forwarded message - --
)ayom: Mar7o Dominguez, Jr. =-captaincaveman1 [email protected]> Date: Mon, Apr j5, 2024 at 5:29AM
Subject Public Comment ForAprrL 1 6th 2024 Planning Commission Meeting TO: Meredirh El@uira <melBi+ira(a)sciHate.org>, <ewashington@sogateorg> J'tem 2 : I askthatthe Commissioners vote no on the two resolutions being presented for ftem 2- There's a reason 'wh'y cities have a Zoning COde and a General Plan. TheVSen/e aS a safeguard tO keep Certain AREAS Ofa eifyfrorn being overdeveloped. NO!/V70u are being aSked by theSe developersto {m theme reStriC'UOnS SO them Can 5uitd WhateVertheVWant at thiS particular tOCetiOn. Never mind the impgctthat their faCit5tyW'i[t heiVe On US the RESIDENTS WhO UVe here. YOur seC=On On thin item Wru haVe a direct imp8Ct On everyonewho lives in this city. 1 122
Think of the future OT' our town- What sort offuture do you want us to have? Doyou want us to have more trafficand longer traveltimesgetting in and out of Our Crty;' DO 'you Want US tO haVe more Waves Of cargo TRUCKS coming On and Off Ofthe 710 Freeway? The reasonwhythese developers want this particuLar location is because ofthe close proximFtyto the 710 Freeway, It's a stone's throw awayfrom wheretheir operation wculd be built. Th5s location would gee them immediate access to a major freeway. Unless these deve(opers are willingtomOd5$ their deSFgnS and adhere tO OurCit5r'S Zoning COdes, I See nO reason foryOu attm mOVe forward wth thiS item. YOU act need tO aSkyourselves, whatsort of city do you want to Ijve in? Again, what sort offuture da 7ou Wantyour cityto haVe? I think OUr City'S fixture CanwithStand net havingthis faCi[ity Or business in it- Butthat'S 3uSt me. Remember, our town is 100 'years Odd. bd vve'r8 doing Ok8'y. ! urge 70ualLto reiectthis item and vote no. Thanks for listening- 2 123
Attachment F
Alien Mgtlis
Via Hand Delivery
April 23, 2024
City of South Gate
Attn: Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
8650 Califomia Avenue
Sotrth Gate, CA 90280
Allen Matl*s Leck Gamble Mallory &Natsis LLP
Attorneys at I,aw
2010 Main Street, 8' Floor i Infflne, CA 92614-7214
Telephone: 949.553.l313i Facsimile: 949.553.8354
www.allemnatkiiu.aom
Piiige H. Gogney
E-mail: [email protected]
DlrectDlal:949.851.5444 FlleNumber:390939.00003/4868-8653-1767.1 Re: Notice of Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Resolution No. 2024-02A (Mun. Code, § 11.50.040)
Ms, Glaze:

This fiim represents South Gate Owner, L.P. ("Owner") in coi'mection with its ownership and development of the approximate 27,1 acre property ("Property") located at 5037 Patata Street in the City of Soutb Gate ("City"), The Property was formerly occupied by Armstrong World Industries andutilized the 240,000 square-foot ("SF") building forthe maiiufacture andproduction of residential and coimnercial linoleum floor tiles and resilient flooring which involved the use of asbestos and other chemicals that led to significant contamination on the Propeity. In coordination with the Department of Toxic Substances and Coritrols ("DTSC"), Owner has spent significant time and resources remediating thepoIluted and abandoned Propeity to eliminatethe prior hazardous conditions and enable its redevelopment for the proposed Project.

Owner is in the process of entitling the Property for development of a proposed 435,420 SF regional headquarters and distribution facility and an approximately 12,777 square foot ttvck maintenance building ("Project") to be leased to Anheuser-Busch. The Project, which wiIl be constructed to LEED-Gold standards witli roof-top solar panels aiid extensive EV-charging infrastructure and operational capacity, is anticipatedto introduce over 250-300 high-paying jobs and will generate significant revenue for tl'ie City among other substantial public benefits set forth in the Project's Development Agree.inent, such as $250,000.00 for off-site roadway improvements, The City's Zoning Code authorizes the Project's rises, s'i'ibject to issuance of a conditional use peimit ("C{JP") and cotnpliance with other applicable City development standards and reguJations. (I'ables I 1,21-3; 11,21-4.) However one development staiidard which cannot be met is a 15,000 square-foot ("SF") size limitation on new industrial wareliouse uses located in the City's Urban Mixed-Use and Commercial Industrial Zoi'ies, including tlie M3 (I-Ieavy Industrial) zone governing the Property. (Id., at footnotes 28, and 11, respectively,) The 15,000 SF cap would Los Angeleg l Omnge County I San Diego i Century City i Sun Francisco i New York 62 124
Allen Matkiris Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attomeys at Law
City of South Gate
April 23, 2024

effectively prohibit t}ie Project (and all of the revenue and community benefits tliat it would bring to the City) as well as preclude all other warehouse facilities capable ofrneetingthe rieeds of the current industrial market. Owner's brolcers have stated that there is limited demand for facilities under 15,000 SF and these facilities generate very few jobs, comtnunity and economic benefits, On April I6, 2024, the City Plaxmng Commission considered tlie adoption of Resolution No. 2024-02A (the "Resolution") which would amend the City's Zoning Code to remove the 15,000 SF1imitationonnewwarehouseusesintheCity. TheAgendaBillpreparedbyCityStaff recornrnended denial of the Resolution based upon, among other things, the unfounded arid inaccurate statementthat elimiiiation ofthe 15,000 SF cap "will undoubtedly lead to the consttuction of warehouses in the City wlffeh are much larger than those currently found in the City." (Aprill6, 2024, Agenda Bill, p, 3.) After considering public testimony from Owiier and other local business owners in support of the Resolution, the Planning Commission voted 3-2 to adopt Staff's recorninendation and deny the Resolution.

In accordance with Section 11,50.040 of the City's Zoning Code, the purpose of this letter is to formally appeal the Planning Commission's action denying the Resolution to the City Council,l Tl'ie Plaming Commission's denial of the Resolution should be vacated and overturned by the City Council for the following reasons, wliich Owner reserves the right to supplement and/or amend prior to or duriiig tlie subsequent public hearing on the matter,

1. The Adoption of the Resolution and Removal of the 15,000 SF Cap Will Increase The City's Flexibihty to Consider New and Renovated Logistics and Warehouse Projects.

Contraiy to the statements and commentaiy provided by Cit5r Staff and members of the Plamiing Coinmission at tlie April 16, 2024, meeting, the adoption of the Resolution and elimination of the 15>000 8F cap on new warehouse uses wouldincrease the City's flexibility a'nd discretion to consider potential new warehorise developments. The scope of new warehouse developments would include proposals to renovate and modernize existing, outdated watel'iouse facilities that are no longer capable of meeting the needs of the modern industrial sector and thereby enable the City to "keep up" with the evolviiig comtnercial and industrial :inarket. This increased flexibility will ensure that the City retains a vibrant and robust, revenue-generating commercial and industrial market that is anchored by facilities, such as the Project, that incorporate the most up-to- date EV-charging and solar energy infrastructure and are constnictedptirsuantto the most-stringent environmental building standards, sucli as LEED Gold certification.

Under the current Zoning Code, the City does not even have the ability to consider new industrialprojectsinvolvingawarehouseusethatexceedsl5,000SF. Asaresult,theCityis deprived of the opportimity to weigh all of the significant monetaiy and community benefits (increased property tax reveniie, off-site public infrasttucture and improvements, Development ' Enclosedpleasefuidacheckfor$2,364,00aspaymentfortheappealfee. 63 125
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attoriieys at Law
City of South Gate
April 23, 2024

Agreement public benefits, poixit-of-sale revenue, trickle-down benefits to local restaurants and retail businesses that would be patronized by employees azxd customers ofthe projects, etc.) that would flow from the approval of such projects against the potential artd/or perceived adverse impacts, In doing so, the Planning Cominission and/or City Council would be able to make an informed decision regarding whether the proposed project is in the best interests of the City, Thus, the adoption of tlie Resolution and amendment of the Zoning Code to remove the 15,000 SF cap for new iixdustrial warehouses would achially empower City legislators and Plaruiing Staff to be more actively involved in determinirig - and implementing - the preferred lorzg-term vision for the City, As of now, the City is handcuffed in its ability to decide the types of development tliatwill ultimately be of greatest use and benefit to City residents and the local business community,

2. The City Will Retain Discretion to Evaluate tlie Benefits and Potential Impacts of New Warehouse Uses on R Project-By-Project Basis Pursuant to tlie Current CUP Approva) and Appeal and CEQA Environmental Review Processes.

As noted above, tl'ie Agenda Bill and verbal presentatioxi by City Staff at the Aprill6, 2024, meeting included the false declaration thatremoval of the 15,000 SF size limitation on new warehouse facilities would "undoubtedly" lead to the proliferation of new, signi&antly larger industrial warehouse facilities in the City. The implication of this patently incorrect and unfounded statement is that adoption of the Resolution would somehow "open the floodgates" to new indushial wareliouses that wouldproliferate tbroughout the City and that City Staff and legislators, including the Planning Cornmissiori and City Couiicil, would l'iave no ability to regulate, condition or deny such projects. This implication is completely false and incorrect.

First, all new proposedwarehouse uses wouldrequire the approval and issuance of a C{JP.

A CUP is a discretionary permit that "may only be approved by the plmining commission or city council in accordance with applicable zone requirements and in compliance with [the Zoiiing Coded," (Min, Code, § 11.52.020.) In order to grant a CUP, the Planning Commission and/or City Coinicil is required to make certain mandatory findings, including that: (i) approval of tlie C{JP is consistent with and will not adversely affect the City's Zoning Code and General Plari; (ii) the design of the proposed development and permit conditions are "compatible with the existing mid future land uses of the applicable zone"; and (iii) approval of the CUP "would not result in detrimental impacts to adjacent properties or to the character or fiu'iction of the neighborhood." (Mun, Code, § 11,52,030,) Subject to these findings, the City Planning Commission and/or City Council have the sole and exclusive discretion to approve, approve subject to certain condit'ons and requirements, or deny a proposed warehouse project. While l'iaving the discretion to deny uses wl'iich could be consideredto be detixnental to adjacent propetties, the City also is empowered, through the CUP process, to impose conditions of approval on the Project to address the impacts of warehouse projects.
64 126
Alien Matkins Leclc Gamble Malloiy & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of 8outh Gate
April 23, 2024

hi addition, all discretionary projects, such as those requiring CUPs, are subject to environmental review under the Califon'iia Environmental Quality Act (Pub, Resources Code, §§ 21000, et seq.) ("CEQA") except for those that qualify for a categorical exemptiotx. (Pub.

Resources Code, F:3 21080(a),) The level of environmental review under CEQA generally depends on, amorig other things, the exact nature of the project being proposed, whether the Site will be developed in pliases or as a single project, and whether the lead agency deteimines that an Environn'iental Impact Repoit ("EIR") is required rather than a mitigated negative declaration ("MND")orexemption. Ultimately,theleadagency-whichinthiscasewouldbetheCity - makes the final deteri'iiination about whether an MND, EIR, or exemption will be reqriired for a project.

The CEQA environmental review process - via aii MND or EIR - is rigorous, thorough and involves a comprehensive analysis of all of a project's potential environmental impacts, including traffic, air quality, greenhouse gas, noise, aesthetics, landuse, water and other impact areas, as well as suggesting mitigation measures that can be imposed to help reduce or eliminate any impacts tl'iat are fouiid to be significant. As with the CUP process, and as a second level of review and "check" on future warehoxise development, the City Planning Commission and/or City Council retain absolute discretion to approve or deny aproposed warehouse project based upon its potential adverse enviroi'imental impacts.

Finally, iti the event that a warehouse project is approved by the Plmming Commission aiid involves some level of public controversy or concern, there is a tliird level of discretion andreview in that the Platu'iing Cornrnission's actiori approving the subject project can be appealed by any ii'iterested party or "opponent" to the City Council. (Muti. Code, § 11.50,040.) The appeal will be heard by the City Council at a noticedpublic hearing during which the CAby Council lias exclusive discretion to affirm tbe Planning Commission's decision, reject or overnile the decision, or impose further conditions on the project beyond tliose imposed by the Planning Coission in granting the original CUP approval. (M'in. Code, % 11,50,040; 11.52.0!10(C)-(B).) Thus, contrary to the statements andrepresentations by City Staff and inthe Aprill6, 2024, Agenda Bill, the approval of the Resolution andremoval of the 15,000 SF cap would result in no loss or reduction in tlie City's discretion to consider and approve or deny future warehouse projects or otherwise cause an uncheclced or unregulated proliferation of massive new warehouse projects in the City. The City - and the City alone - retains tlie discretion to determine what industrial projects over 15,000 SF get approved (if any) and under wliat conditions or restrictions. As noted above, tl'ie adoption ofthe Resolution and retnoval of the 15,000 SF size limitation would have tlie effect of increasing the Plaiu'iing Coinmission's and City Cotuxcil's flexibility and opportunity to determine tl'ie scope of new warehouse desrelopment in the City. 65 127
Allen Matlcins Leclc Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Sotith Gate
April 23, 2024

3. Conclusion.

Based upon the foregoing, and any additional documents, iiifoimation and evidence that may be further presented at or before the scheduledpublic heaiing on this appeal, Owner respectfullyrequests that the City Couicil vacate aiid oveitinan the Planning Comtission's April 16, 2024, denial and approve the Resolution in its entirety.

Please contact us if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter in further detail. truly
PHG
Enclostffl5
cc: Cm'tg Hardwick, City Attorney (via e-mail only w/o Encl.) Rob Houston, City Manager (via e-mail only w/o Encl.) Client (via e-mail only w/o Encl,)
66 128
Office ui tlie Item No. 8
'AN 2 :' 7'25 Citv of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA BULL
For the Regular Meeting of: January 28, 2025
Originating Department: City Manager Office
citywanager: 'kd;""'&t[@ ciywanager: M"Jb'(
Rob Houston Rob Houston
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF REMOTE PARTICIPATION OPTIONS FOR CITY

COUNCIL AND COMMISSION MEETINGS
PURPOSE: To present the City Council with infonnation on virtual platfonn options for public participation at City Councill and Coinmission meetings, including the costs involved and factors weighing in favor and against such use.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive report and provide direction.

FISCAL IMPACT: Preliminary cost estimates for additional staffing are $12,180 per year with an annual Zoom subscription costing approximately $7,000 per year.

BACKGROUND: The City Council directed the City Manager to provide infon'nation detailing the costs and impacts of bringing back a call-in or virtual participation platform feature at City Council and Commission meetings.

Coini'nencing in Marcl'i2020, amid implementation of COVID-19 restrictions, the Governor issued various executive orders relaxing in-person participation requirements under the Brown Act and pen'nitting cities in California to provide remote features such as Zoom for public access and participation at public meetings. These temporary remote features were used by both members of the public and elected and appointed officials to attend meetings remotely. As COVID-19 restrictions were relaxed and eventually lifted, the Governor's executive orders ended, requiring cities to comply with pre-COVID-19 Brown Act requirements. Thus, the use of remote public participation platfori'ns at public agency meetings became voluntary rather than mandatory, and somewhat extinct. In fact, most cities in the region have discontinued remote access and moved back to in person meetings like they existed prior to March 2020. In a review of Gateway Cities in our region, 28 of the 32 cities had returned to in-person public participation attendance. Only 4 have retained remote/zoom call-in features.

Anecdotally, there are several varied reasons why cities may have eliminated remote public participation platfori'ns from public meetings. Ai'nong those reasons are cost related issues. Virtual meetings, in which members of the public are in person and appear remotely, tend to consume 1 129
more ti'i'ne. While there is a clear benefit to a com+'nunity member being able to participate remotely at apublic meeting, tliere is also arisk of abuse of tecl'inologyplatforins by those wishing to disrupt or delay public agency proceedings. It is difficult to deten'nine or limit a public speaker, liaving already corni'nented once, from subsequently calling back in under a different alias to provide additional comi'nents.

Other cities have simply balanced the interest of encouraging public participation by in person attendance against more anonymous and perhaps less transparent and respectful call-in or virtual attendance. There are also balances tliat have compared the ease of participation against the added impact of requiring staff members to attend longer meetings, only to be expected to return the next day at 7 am to complete a 10-hour workday. Certainly, the trend among cities appears to be to returntopre-COVIDl9requirementsundertheBrownAct. Indeed,whiletheLegislaturerecently amended the Brown Act, those amendments did not require cities to continue providing remote access at public meetings.

As a further sign of backing away from remote participation, recent amendments to the Brown Act under Assembly Bill 2302 have limited the ability of elected officials to attend city council meetings remotely. AB 2302 limits the use of remote features for City Council members to only certain circumstances, mostly health related, thus predominantly mandating in person attendance except in rare circumstances. For cities that meet two times per month City Council members shall not attend in a remote fashion more than a maximum of 5 times per year, The only exception is for emergencies. The Brown Act does not place similar restrictions on remote access as it pertains to the public.

The City Council received infon'nation last year on retaining remote call-in features and determined they would cease providing remote access for cornrnent. Instead, they invested in video equipment and added the live video feature to Council and Commission meetings. Now that video equipment is installed, all City Council and Coini'nission meetings are viewable online, both live and in recorded fori'n.

A benefit of remote access for public coinment using a Zoom or similar platfon'n is that it provides a way for corni'nents to be received from public members wlio are not physically present or able to attend meetings. Currently, those who are unable to attend in person can still participate by sending comments ahead of the meeting to be read into the record during the meeting. In this fashion, those not in attendance are treated in a material similar fashion as is they were in person.

As stated above, drawbacks of providing a Zoom or call-in feature include the cost of additional staffing that would need to be added to handle the calls or Zoom requests as the Clerk and Commission assistants currently are fully tasked with existing duties that include supporting the meeting, timing comments, reading email comments, ensuring the video feed is operating correctly, and handling presentations. An estimate of additional labor costs is $12,180 for staffing to cover all Council and Comi'nission meetings. An additional cost if Zoom was to be used for remote access is the approximately $7,000 cost for a City Zoom license.

An additional drawback is due to problems that can occur with connectivity for either Zoom or a call-in feature if the system disconnects as has happened numerous times wlien the City did use 2 130
Zoom during tlie implementation of COVID 19 restrictions. If the system disconnects or audio issues occur tliis could constitute a situation where it could require the meeting to be stopped and possibly canceled ifthe public lost tlieir ability to co'inment remotely, or if a public member feigned that the coitu'nunication was lost.

Staff maintains that tlie current approach at the City strikes a sufficient balance between the need to conduct tl'ie city's business while still allowing for public coinment. In fact, the City provides far more opportunity for the public to corninent on both agenda and non-agenda items tliat what is required under the Brown Act, or is permitted in many other facilities. For example, the City does not limit the number of speakers or the aggregate time allocated for public comment. It also does not require the public to fill out a card identifying the agenda item in advance upon which the public member wishes to coinrnent.

Staff seeks 'further guidance from the City Council on which direction to consider, namely whether to implement a remote participation option, or to keep its current practice in place without further change.
3 131
apChkLSt
01/06/2025
5'mcB or me
South Gate City Clerk
WARRANT REGISTER FOR COUNCIL MEETING 1/28/2025JAN 2 3 2025 Final Check List
2:35:38PM CITY OF SOUTH GATE

PART I
Page: 1
AMERICAN FIDELITYASSURANCBen362537
CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM(Ben362555
LIBERTY DENTAL PLAN, OF CALllBen362539
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST
Check # Date Vendor
108669 1/2/2025 00000437
Voucher
108670 1/2/2025 00002417
Voucher
108671 1/2/2025 0012107
Voucher
108672 1/2/2025 00000438
Voucher:
108673 1/2/2025 00002138
Voucher
108674 1/2/2025 0014756
Voucher:
108675 1/2/2025 00002421
Voucher
108676 1/2/2025 00000335
Voucher.
108677 1/2/2025 0011466
Voucher:
108678 1/2/2025 0011467
Voucher
108679 1/2/2025 00003152
Voucher
108680 1/2/2025 0011468
Voucher.
108681 1/2/2025 00000334
Voucher
UNITED WAY OF GREATER LOS ABen362543
SUPERIOR VISION SERVICES, IN Ben362535
SOUTH GATE POLICE EXPLOREFBen362541
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Ben362531
POLICE OFFICERS ASSOClATIOl'iBen362553
POLICE MANAGEMENTASSOClABen362547
AFLAC
COLONIAL INSURANCE CO.

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD

RELIANCE STANDARD
13 checks in this report.

Invoice
Ben362549
Ben362545
Ben362551
Ben362533
Inv Date Description
1/2/2025 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE INS : PA
Amount Paid
311 .98
1/2/2025 AMERICAN FIDELITY (ABT): PAYR 183.86
1/2/2025 CA STATE DISB. UNIT: PAYMENT 1,036.44
1/2/2025 COLONIAL INSURANCE CO: PAYI 2,324.48
1 /2/2025 GARNISHMENT - FRANCHISE TA 1 691 .80
1/2/2025 LIBERTY DENTAL INSUR (MISC) 2 849.26
1 /2/2025 POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOC. 2,375.00
1/2/2025 POLICE ASSOCIATION DUES PA 6,375.00
1/2/2025
1/2/2025
1 /2/2025
1/2/2025
1/2/2025
PRINCIPAL DENTAL PPO (MISC) 30,819.61
LONG TERM DISABILITY: PAYME

SGPD EXPLORER YOUTH PROG
SUPERIOR VISION MISC.: PAYME
UNITED WAY: PAYMENT
5 72".57
6 45.00
3 931 .05

26.00 Sub total for BANK OF THE WEST:

Grand Total All Checks:

Check Total
311.98
183.86
1 ,036.44
2,324.48
1 691.80
2,849.26
2,375.00
6,375.00
30,819.61
5,727.57
645.00
3 93105

26.00 58.297.05

58.297.05
Z
o
Page: 1
',J)
132
WARRANT REGISTER FOR COUNCIL MEETING 1/28/2025 PART II apChkLst
01/09/2025 9:44:55AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH G ATE
Page: I
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST
Check # Date Vendor
108685 1/8/2025 00004934
Voucher:
108686 1/8/2025 00004869
Voucher
108687 1/8/2025 0005310
Voucher
108688 1/8/2025 0014704
Voucher
108689 1/8/2025 0010664
Voucher
108690 1/8/2025 00004865
Voucher
108691 1/8/2025 00004906
Voucher
108692 1/8/2025 00001848
Voucher
108693 1/8/2025 0014146
Voucher
108694 1/8/2025 0014720
Voucher
Invoice Inv Date Descrmtion
GAS COMPANY 115 800 9600 3- 2 1 2/ 6/2024
113 798 0353 6- 2 2/ 6/2024
189 300 9500 7- 2 2/ 8/2024
013 900 7300 3- z 2/ 6/2024
094 300 7500 3- 2 2/ 7/2024
186 100 7200 3- ; 2/ 6/2024
049 200 7902 9- :) 2/ 7/2024
045 400 7300 6- 2 2/ 6/2024
083 407 6536 4- 2 2/23/2024
126 300 9600 1- ; 2/16/2024
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPAfS53744100008 - r 2/12/2024 63744100007 - r 2/12/2024
73744100006 - r 2/12/2024
1NVLEX1124249 1/1/2024LEXIPOL LLC
BILLING PRD- 12/24- 2/ 2/24
BILLING PRD- 2/24- 2/ 2/24
BILLING PRD- 5/24- 2/ 6/24
BILLING PRD- 2/24- 2/ 2/24
BILLING PRD- 4/24- 2/ 4/24
BILLING PRD- 2/24- 2/ 2/24
BILLING PRD- 2/24- 2/ 3/24
BILLING PRD- 2/24- 2/ 2/24
BILLING PRD- /20/24- 2/ 9/24
BILLING PRD- /12/24- 2/ 2/24
BILLING PRD- /01/24 -12/03/24
BILLING PRD- /01/24 -12/03/24
BILLING PRD- /04/24 -12/03/24

ANNUAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PI
LOGHMANI & ASSOCIATES DESI(03
PD GOLD COAST K9 DBA SGPD-31
SO CALIF EDISON 1 /7/2025

SWRCB FEES

VERIZON WIRELESS
SW-0298383
WD-0280163
9979487277
W.G. ZIMMERMAN ENGINEERING24-10-598
24-11-620
22 CONSTRUCTION, INC 3R
12/19/2024 11/19/24-12/17/24 - CONSTRUCTI
12/17/2024 POLICE SERVICE CANINE - K9
1 /8/2025
11 /20/2024
1 2/4/2024
11 /23/2024
11 /7/2024
12 /4/2024
1 2/1 6/2024
Billing Period - 1 0/22/2024 to 1 /2/21
7/1/24-6/30/25 - FACILITY ID 419
7/1/24-6/30/25 - FACILITY ID. 4SS
SERVICE PERIOD. 10/24/24-11/23
OCTOBER 2024 - TRAFFIC ENGII
NOVEMBER 2024 - TRAFFIC ENC
11/01/24-11/30/24 - CONSTRUCTI
Amount Paid
'11 843.67
6,115.79
1 880.30
1 624.41
1 ,075.42
473.75
149.11
109.62

17.71 14.79
2 47.24
247.24
247.24
14644.82
375,573.00
9,371 .25
89 352. 12
36 393.00
7 ,760.00
8 ,608.39
17,000.00
12,750.00
609,905.53
Sub total for BANK OF THE WEST:

Check Total
23,304.57
741.72
14,644.82
375,573.00
9 371.25
89,352.12
44, 153.00
8,608.39
29,750.00
609,905.53
1 ,205,404.40
10 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1 ,205,404.40

133
WARRANT REGISTER FOR COUNCIL MEETING 1 /28/2025 PART Ill apChkLst
0110912025 1116:21Afftl
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH G ATE
Page: I
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
108695
108696
108697
108698
108699
108700
108701
108702
108703
108704
108705
108706
1 0F3701
108708
1 /9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
i/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher
00001467
00003971
0010065
00000437
0011293
0011059
0011577
0012563
0014836
0009798
0007290
0014826
0014835
00003692
ADMINISTRATIVE SERV. CO-OP 241017
ADMINSURE INC. 3747i
AFC HYDRAULIC SEALS & 35588
AFLAC Ben362252
AGRI-TURF DISTRIBUTING, LLC 101373
ALESHIRE&WYNDER,LLP 91873
ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO946-l'l01512
ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES, CC110686-2024-11
ALVIZO, MARIA Ref000361737
ANIMAL FRIENDS PET HOTEL 657780386
APW KNOX-SEEMAN 20535522
20546784
ARMENDARIZ, ALFREDO Ref00036l694
ARMENDARIZ, ALFREDO Ref000361736
AT&T MOBILITY 287288333867X11 11/2/2024
287288333867XOE 8/2/2024
287288333867XO!' 9/2/2024
25506 11 /20/2024108709 1/9/2025 0013615
Voucher

AUTOLIFT SERVICES INC
Inv Date Description
10/31/2024 0CT 2024 - PROVIDE PHONE-A-F
11/15/2024 DEC 2024 -WORKERS COMP CU
11 /18/2024 REPAIR HYDRAULIC EQUIPMEN-
12 /19/2024 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE INS.. PA
11 /25/2024 PESTICIDES - FERTILIZERS & PE
12 /2/2024 THRU11/14/2024-SPECIALIZED
10 /16/2024 LEVEL232ACHARGERS
11 /12/2024 ARPASLFRFFUNDSTOIMPLEM
10 /16/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00057614-84i
11 /12/2024 BOARDING SERVICE - K9 CHAVC
11/21/2024
11 /26/2024
1 0/1 7/2024

MISC AUTO PARTS & LUBES

MISC AUTO PARTS & LUBES
UB REFUND CST#00032274- 92:)
10/16/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00033056-92.
1 0/3/2024-1 1/2/2024 - ACCT# 287;
7 /3/2024-8/2/2024 - ACCT# 287281
8/3/2024-9/2/2024 - ACCT# 287281

REPLACE GREASE HOSE REEL
Amount Paid
63,775.06
9 789.00
516.12
311.98
385.19
1 .099.40
9,478.51
37,229.69
142.08
585.00
357.58

93.32 40.00

40.00 1 207.20
I ,207.20
1 ,207.20
1 981.07
Check Total
63,775.06
9 789.00
516.12
311 .98
385. 19
1,099.40
9,478.51
37 229.69
142.08
585.00
450.90

40.00 40.00
3,621 .60
1 981.07

134
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Fina) Check List

CITY OF SOUTH G ATE
Page: 2
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check# Date Vendor Invoice InvDate Description
108710 1/9/2025 0010585 AUTOZONE STORES INC. 05488681944 1 /19/2024 AUTO PARTS Voucher 05488688948 1 /26/2024 AUTO PARTS
05488683555 1 /20/2024 AUTO PARTS
05488682650 1 /19/2024 AUTO PARTS
05488689504 1 /26/2024 AUTO PARTS
054886831 47 1 /20/2024 AUTO PARTS
05488684363 1 /21/2024 AUTO PARTS
05488683801 1 /21/2024 AUTO PARTS
05488683391 1 /20/2024 AUTO PARTS
108711 1/9/2025 00al483l BAUTISTA, NANCY Ref000361699 10/17/2024 UB REFUND CST #ODO62490 - 26- Voucher.
108712 1/9/2025 0011669 BDOUSALLP 002338553 11/26/2024 NOV2024-BDOUSA,LLPACCO Voucher
108713 1/9/2025 00000651 BSNSPORTS,LLC 927274949B 11/21/2024 SPORTSEQUIPMENT Voucher
108714 1/9/2025 0005346 CALACT 2025-153 1/1/2025 PARKSDIRECTORCOSTLEYME Voucher
108715 1/9/2025 00000759 CALIFORNIAFRAME&AXLE 79732 11/27/2024 GARAGEREPAIRS Voucher
108716 1/9/2025 00'l2107 CALIFORNIA STATE DlSBURSEMtBen362256 12/19/2024 CA STATE DISB. UNIT PAYMENT Voucher
108717 1/9/2025 0014833 CANALES, JESUS ReTOOO36l734 10/16/2024 UB REFUND CST#0004'1638 - 10 Voucher.
108718 1/9/2025 00M837 CARRERA,ANTONIO ReTOOO3(31738 '10/16/2024 UBREFUNDCST#OO065964-51- Voucher
108719 1/9/2025 0006239 CENTRALFORD 52295 11/26/2024 AUTOPARTS Voucher 51982 11/20/2024 AUTOPARTS
51985 11/19/2024 AUTOPARTS
51634 11/26/2024 AUTOPARTS
108720 1/9/2025 0014841 CERVANTES, MARIA ELENA Ref000361742 11/27/2024 UB REFUND CST #00065790 - 99:

Voucher
108721 1/9/2025 0005839 CHAMPION CHRYSLER JEEP DOl719195 11/26/2024 DEALER PARTS FOR CHARGER Voucher:
108722 1/9/2025 0012980 CHARTERCOMMUNICATIONS 188426601111424 11/14/2024 SUBLIEASE2ACCT#188426601 Voucher
Amount Paid Check Total
146.42
115.75
106.93

87.63 73.86

61.99 30.85

21.36 8.80
178.01
2 ,495.00

23.97 975.00
3 02. 13
1 ,036.44

40.00 178.64
156.25

79.54 68.73

66.83 104.49
427.68
134.99
653.59
178.01
2 ,495.00

23.97 975.00
3 02. 13
1 ,036.44

40.00 178.64
371 .35
104.49
427.68
134.99
Page: 2
135
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Page: 3
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check# Date Vendor Invoice InvDate Description
108723 1/9/2025 00004302 CINTASUNIFORMSERVICES 4213273316 12/2/2024 SHOPTOWELCLEANINGSERVI( Voucher
108724 1/9/2025 0013707 CITYOFBELL 2024-66 10/21/2024 JUL-SEP2024-REIMBURSEMEI's Voucher:
108725 1/9/2025 00005090 CITYOFPARAMOUNT 11/13/24WATER 11/13/2024 9/2/24-11/4/24-13652GARFIELD Voucher.
108726 1/9/2025 0013515 CITYTIRES 45612 11/13/2024 TIRESFORPARKSMOWERS Voucher
108727 1/9/2025 0011708 CLIENTFIRSTTECHNOLOGY,COl17578 11/30/2024 NOV2024-ENTERPRISERESOl Voucher.
108728 1/9/2025 0011922
Voucher
108729 1/9/2025 0014673
Voucher
108730 1/9/2025 00005110
Voucher:
108731 1/9/2025 00005110
Voucher
108732 1/9/2025 00001423
Voucher:
108733 1/9/2025 0013681
Voucher.
108734 1/9/2025 00003695
Voucher
108735 1/9/2025 00001560
Voucher.
108736 1/9/2025 0014830
Voucher
108737 1/9/2025 0013810
Voucher
CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS85019619
85093532
CORE & MAIN LP V971582
11 /1 3/2024
11 /20/2024
1l /8/2024
COUNTY OF L.A. DEPT OF PW 1N240000451 1/4/2024
COUNTY OF L.A. DEPT OF PW RE-PW-24050606 5/6/2024
RE-PW-24ffl202- 11/12/2024
RE-PW-24ffl202E 11/12/2024
RE-PW-24100702 10/7/2024
lN240001032 6/13/2024
RE-PW-240506071 5/6/2024
DAILY JOURNALCORPORATION B3873183 11/21/2024
B3876031 12/5/2024
DANIELSTIRESERVICE,INC 200523293 11/20/2024
200522591 11/15/2024
200523017 11/20/2024
DELUXE CORPORATION 16600316 7/15/2024
11/6/24-11/11/24 MEDICAL SERVR
11/19/24 - MEDICAL SERVICES Fi

INVENTORY PO/ COPPER
2/3/23-11/30/23 - LABOR AND EQI
THRU APR 2024 - TRAFFIC SIGN,
THRU OCT 2024 - TRAFFIC SIGN
THRU OCT 2024 - TRAFFIC SIGN
THRU SEP 2024 - TRAFFIC SIGN,
6/1/23-5/31/24 - LABOR AND EQU
THRU APR 2024 - TRAFFIC SIGN,

ZONING CODE AMENDMENT & C
ORDIANCE NO. 2024-04-CC, OR[

AUTOMOTIVE TIRES

AUTOMOTIVE TIRES

AUTOMOTIVE TIRES
2,000 BLANK LASER STOCK CHE
DEPTOFGENERALSERVICES 1610956
ELIZARRARAZ, PATRICIA Ref000361698
11/30/2024 ADMINISTRATVE JUDGE SERVIC
10/17/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00063984-271
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SEC124-678
24-636
11/11 /2024
10/27 /2024
10/20/24-11/2/24 - SECURITY FOF
10/6/24-10/19/24 - SECURITY FOF
Amount Paid

48.51 7,969.00

83.32 1,410.19
6,856.25
621 .00
243.00
4,795.88
2,217.08
2,093.54
1 ,455.63
1 ,206.79
921 .73
369.81
722.69
315.00
110.00
1 ,259.60
692.19
140.40
551 .00
16,293.75
163.34
7,275.00
7,230.00
Check Total

48.51 7,969.00

83.32 1,410.19
6,856.25
864.00
4,795.88
2,217.08
6,770.19
425.00
2,092.19
551 .00
16,293.75
163.34
14,505.00
Page. 3
136
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Page: 4
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
108738 1/9/2025 0014481
Voucher
108739 1/9/2025 0010558
Voucher
108740 1/9/2025 0013187
Voucher
108741 1/9/2025 0013912
Voucher
108742 1/9/2025 00002026
Voucher:
108743 1/9/2025 0014842
Voucher
108744 1/9/2025 0010625
Voucher.
108745 1/9/2025 00003770
Voucher:
108746 1/9/2025 00002138
Voucher:
108747 1/9/2025 0009215
Voucher:
108748 1/9/2025 0013954
Voucher:
108749 1/9/2025 00002890
Voucher:
108750 1/9/2025 0013098
Voucher:

Invoice
EYEMED 10007 42433
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMP7167-185086
167-185082
167-185576
FAST 5 SOUTH GATE 9, LLC 7839
FAST DEER BUS CHARTER, INC. 12079
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATI 8-675-43088
8-690-02275
FELIX, JAVIER Ref000361743
FLEETCREW / ZIPPY 56939
FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 22000
21982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben362254
G&MOILCOMPANY,LLC 012-068
GANNETTFLEMING,INC. 074896-01-019
074896-01-018
GRAINGER 9273649427
9285165842-Rl
925251 9476-Rl
9304285886
9285165859-Rl
9242465798-Rl
9284948891-Rl
92424891 52-Rl
9243118602-Rl
GREEN'S DRY CLEANING & LAUTh539227
Inv Date Description
11/26/2024 SAFETYGLASSESFORFY24/25
11/19/2024 FACTORY AUTO PARTS
11/19/2024 FACTORY AUTO PARTS
11/25/2024 FACTORY AUTO PARTS
10/31/2024 0CT 2024 CAR WASH SRVS (84
11/22/2024 BUSESFORDEPARTMENTEXC(
11/8/2024 FEDEX PRIORITY OVERNIGHT &
11/22/2024 FEDEX PRIORITY OVERNIGHT
11/27/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00060995-331
11/1/2024 SERVICEEMMISIONCONTROLE
11/20/2024 UNDERGROUNDSTORAGETANI
11 /18/2024 UNDERGROUNDSTORAGETANI
12 /19/2024 GARNISHMENT-FRANCHISETA
11/11/2024 0CT2024EXPRESSCARWASH(
1'l/25/2024 THRU10/25/24-AMENDMENTTO
10/22/2024 THRU9/27/24-AMENDMENTTOI
CREDIT - INV# 9237749370
10/17/2024 RI CK# 108259 - SPECIALTY HAR
9/17/2024 RI CK# 108259 - SPECIALTY HAR
11/4/2024 SPECIALTY HARDWARE
10/17/2024 RI CK# 108259 - SPECIALTY HAR
9 /9/2024 RI CK# 108259 - SPECIALTY HAR
10 /17/2024 RI CK# 108259 - SPECIALTY HAR
9/9/2024 RI CK# 108259 - SPECIALTY HAR
9 /10/2024 RI CK# 108259 - SPECIALTY HAR
10 /31 /2024 0CT 2024 JAIL CLEANING OF BL
Amount Paid
B7.97
287.61
171.73
104.32
588.00
1 ,610.00

55.18 9.39
161.42
639.00
819.16
560.00
883.89
150.00
3,802.18
3 ,320.04
-358.74
760.76
358.74
201 .21

97.88 4 7.13

41.38 40. 17

12.56 1 .389.60
Check Total

87.97 563.66
588.00
1 ,610.00

64.57 161.42
639.00
1,379.16
883.89
150.00
7,122.22
1 ,201 .09
1 ,389.60
Page. 4
137
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Page: 5
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description
108751 1/9/2025 0013070
Voucher
108752 1/9/2025 00002529
Voucher:
108753 1/9/2025 00000268
Voucher
108754 1/9/2025 0013562
Voucher:
108755 1/9/2025 0008222
Voucher:
108756 1/9/2025 00000209
Voucher:
108757 1/9/2025 0005586
Voucher
108758 1/9/2025 00000430
Voucher:
108759 1/9/2025 0012510
Voucher:
108760 1/9/2025 00003540
Voucher
108761 1/9/2025 00004005
Voucher:

GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. GSI-SGUO-40
GSI-SGUO-41
HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASS S1NO44950
9 /30/2024 SEP2024-CONSTRUCTIONMAfS
10 /31/2024 0CT2024-CONSTRUCTIONMATh
12/10/2024 0CT-DEC 2024 - SALES TAX COI%
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV1CEEO341077
5354412
8361047
0341075
6354397
6354398
0341076
0373887
9340973
5373950
INTER-GRAPHICS COMPANY INV-0000405
JCLTRAFFICSERVICES 126968
JHM SUPPLY INC. 1 00893/3
101018/3
10091 7/3
JOE A. GONSALVES & SONS 162095
JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASSOC1ATSG1MS412409
SG11W12409
SGI BCR12409
SGI UOR12409
SG 24'll30KILEY & ASSOCIATES, LLC
2/2/2024
1/27/2024
1 /14/2024
2 /2/2024
1 /26/2024
1 /26/2024
2 /2/2024
I /22/2024
1/13/2024
I /27/2024
1/25/2024

MISC SUPPLIES

MISC SUPPLIES

MISC SUPPLIES

STREET SUPPLIES

STREET SUPPLIES

STREET SUPPLIES

MISC SUPPLIES

MISC SUPPLIES

SOCKETS FOR SOLAR LIGHTIN(

MISC SUPPLIES

PRINTING & MAILING FOR SG C(
11/27/2024 BARRICADES,TRAFFIC PRODUC
11/21/2024
1 2/3/2024
11 /25/2024
11/21/2024
11 /1 8/2024
11 /1 8/2024
11 /1 8/2024
11 /1 8/2024
11 /30/2024
LACOUNTYDEPT.OFPUBLICW(RE-PW-23110602! 11/6/2024
PW-23110602638 11/6/2023
LEXISNEXISRISKSOLUTIONS 1100037932 10/31/2024

SMALL TOOLS

GROUNDS SUPPLIES

SMALL TOOLS
DEC 2024 - LEGISLATIVE ADVOC
SEP 2024 - NPDES PROGRAM
SEP 2024 -MANAGEMENT SERVI
SEP 2024 - BEVERAGE CONTAIN
SEP 2204 - MANAGEMENT SERV
NOV 2024 -AMEND NO 2 TO COh
OCT 2023 - REPLACEMENT OF [:

THRU OCT 2023 - TWEEDY BLVD
OCT 2024 - MONTHLY SUBSCRIF
Amount Paid
2,862.72
2,207.52
1 ,443.42
698.72
526.96
373.71
368.43
364.30
327.80
226.23
207.38

94.34 25.60
17,212.00
1,186.23
1 .983.89
1 ,705.29
2 90.95
2,500.00
6,825.75
3,385.75
870.75
129.00
3,333.33
1418.81

1.196.27
1 ,450.00
Check Total
5,070.24
1 ,443.42
3,21 3.47
17,212.00
1,186.23
3,980.13
2,500.00
11,211.25
3,333.33
2 615.08
1 ,450.00

138
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Page: 6
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check# Date Vendor Invoice InvDate Description
108762 1/9/2025 00004384 LIENONME,INC. 10334678 /19/2024 MEDICALREVIEWFORJ.QUISlTh Voucher: 10334679 /19/2024 MEDICALREVIEWFORJ.TREJO
10334680 /19/2024 MEDICALREVIEWFORR.PETEF
10334681 /19/2024 MEDICALREVIEWFORJ.FLORE
108763 1/9/2025 00003941 M.HARALAWNMOWERCENTER51195 /20/2024 SMALLEQUIPMENTSALESAND Voucher: 51237 /20/2024 SMALLEQUIPMENTSALESAND
108764 1/9/2025 0011575 MERCHANTSBUILDING 838068 0/31/2024 FY24/25CUSTODIALANDMAINT Voucher
108765 1/9/2025 00000447 MISC-BLDGPERMITS 253788-GAPCO 10/16/2024 FULLREFUNDFORCUPACCEP- Voucher:
108766 1/9/2025 00000447 MISC-BLDGPERMITS 0240001471-AGUI 12/3/2024 WWRPREFUNDREQUESTPERII Voucher:
108767 1/9/2025 00000447 MISC-BLDGPERMITS 253354-FLORES 11/26/2024 REFUND-WRONGAPPLICATON Voucher
108768 1/9/2025 00000170 MISC - PKS & REC REFUND 80090655 ROSAS 12/9/2024 REFUND OF DEPOSIT AFTER EV Voucher:
108769 1/9/2025 00000170 MISC - PKS & REC REFUND 79748849 CORTE 11/25/2024 REFUND OF DEPOSIT AFTER EV Voucher:
108770 1/9/2025 0009426 MV CHENG & ASSOCIATES, INC. 11/30/2024B 11/27/2024 NOV 2024 - (JIM) SR. FINANCIAL Voucher:
108771 1/9/2025 00004969 NATIONALREADYMIXEDCONCF922689 11/13/2024 CONCRETE,SANDANDAGGRE( Voucher
108772 1/9/2025 0009990 NATURE'SSELECTPETFOOD 199553 10/17/2024 FOODFORK-9CARLO/VARELA Voucher: 200419 10/25/2024 FOODFORK-90TIS/MENDEZ
108773 1/9/2025 0014845 NEXCAR INC Ref000361746 11/27/2024 UB REFUND CST #00064650- 347 Voucher
108774 1/9/2025 00ffl39 NORM REEVES FORD SUPERST(132333 11/25/2024 VEHICLE REPAIRS AND PARTS Voucher:

Amount Paid
293.15
187.70
148.23
130.75
218.59
143.58
26,126.10
7,320.00
6,571.15
1 ,085.00
319.00
165.00
12,750.00
909.68
126.12
126.12
204.28
2,947.50
Check Total
759.83
362.17
26,126.10
7,320.00
6,571.15
1 ,085.00
319.00
165.00
12,750.00
909.68
252.24
204.28
2,947.50
Page: 6
139
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Page: 7
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check# Date Vendor Invoice
108775 1/9/2025 0007984 0'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3063- 96852 Voucher 3063-92686
3063- 94800
3063- 94955
3063- 94089
3063- 95775
3063- 97064
3063- 94827
3063- 94912
108776 1/9/2025 0014840 PADILLA, MARIA Ref00036l741 Voucher:
108777 1/9/2025 00002769 PARISLASERPRINTERREPAIR 30110 Voucher:
108778 1/9/2025 0014827 PULIDO, JUAN Ref000361695
Voucher.
108779 1/9/2025 0014839 RAMIREZAGUILAR, WILMER MOlRef000361740 Voucher:
108780 1/9/2025 0014829 RAMIREZ, GENARO Ref000361697 Voucher:
108781 1/9/2025 00000416 RAPID-O-PRINT 32146
Voucher:
108782 1/9/2025 00004773 RET ALMANZA, JOSEPH A DEC 2024 Voucher:
108783 1/9/2025 0008275 RET AROCHA, FRANCIS X. DEC 2024 Voucher
108784 1/9/2025 00001840 RETBLASKA,WILLIAMMIKE DEC2024 Voucher.
108785 1/9/2025 00004776 RETCARTER,LLOYDB DEC2024
Voucher:
108786 1/9/2025 00000495 RETCHAVEZ,ANTHONYA DEC2024 Voucher:
108787 1/9/2025 0006505 RETCORBET,RONALD DEC2024
Voucher
108788 1/9/2025 00004777 RETDAY,ROBERTA DEC2024
Voucher
Inv Date Description
CREDIT - INVOICE# 3063-195775
CREDIT INV# 3063-191933
1/19/2024 AUTO PARTS
1/20/2024 AUTO PARTS
1/14/2024 AUTO PARTS
1 /25/2024 AUTO PARTS
2 /4/2024 GROUNDS SUPPLIES
i/19/2024 AUTO PARTS
1/19/2024 AUTO PARTS
1/27/2024 UBREFUNDCST#OO063487-10
10/31/2024 LASERJECTCOLORENTERPRIS
10/17/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00064232-31:
10/16/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00064164-27i
10/17/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00062682-89
10/4/2024 DOJ LIVE SCAN FORMS
12/9/2024 DEC2024-RETIREEMEDICALIN
12/9/2024 DEC2024-RETIREEMEDICALIN
12/9/2024 DEC2024-RETIREEMEDICALIN
12/9/2024 DEC2024-RETIREEMEDICALIN
12/9/2024 DEC2024-RETIREEMEDICALIN
12/9/2024 DEC2024-RETIREEMEDICALIN
12/9/2024 DEC2024-RETIREEMEDICALIN
Amount Paid
- 59.52
- 27.36

90.33 73.75

59.82 59.52

59.50 44.96

21.30 45.27
240.35
122.94
204.28
138.88
216.09
167.79
1 ,435.98
2 50.00
250.00
150.00
1 ,435.98
2 50.00
Check Total
322.30

45.27 240.35
122.94
204.28
138.88
216.09
167.79
1 ,435.98
2 50.00
250.00
150.00
1 ,435.98
2 50.00

140
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Page: 8
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued )
Check #
108789
108790
108791
108792
108793
108794
108795
108796
108797
108798
108799
108800
108801
108802
Date Vendor
1/9/2025
Voucher.
1 /9/2025
Voucher:
1/9/2025
Voucher:
1/9/2025
Voucher
1 /9/2025
Voucher
i/9/2025
Voucher
'i /9/2025
Voucher.
1 /9/2025
Voucher
1 /9/2025
Voucher:
1 /9/2025
Voucher.
1/9/2025
Voucher
1 /9/2025
Voucher:
1/9/2025
Voucher
1/9/2025
Voucher:
0008746
0011326
0006508
001 0881
0010410
00003798
00000458
00000459
0014843
0007826
0008369
00000322
001 4767
00004830
RET: DELEON RUBEN
RET GALVAN, RAY A.

RET GOMEZ, JOSEPH C.

RET: KOOPMANS, WILLIAM O.

RET. LEO FRANK
RET: RANGEL, ARMANDO

RET SEWELL, ELAINE
RET. SEWELL, KENNETH R

RIVERA, FRANK

RON'S MAINTENANCE, INC

SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEM, INC

SAM'S CLUB

SC FUELS

SCS ENGINEERS
Invoice
DEC 2024
DEC 2024
DEC 2024
DEC 2024
DEC 2024
DEC 2024
DEC 2024
DEC 2024
Ref00036l744
1180
95780558
005144
002008
IN-0000020421
0510401
Inv Date Description
12/9/2024 DEC2024-RETIREEMEDICALIN
i 2/9/2024
12/9/2024
12/9/2024
12/9/2024
i 2/9/2024
1 2/9/2024
12/9/2024
11 /27/2024
11 /27/2024
11 /1 3/2024
11/21/2024
11 /1 5/2024
11 /26/2024
DEC 2024- RETIREE MEDICAL IN
DEC 2024- RETIREE MEDICAL IN
DEC 2024- RETIREE MEDICAL IN
DEC 2024- RETIREE MEDICAL IN
DEC 2024- RETIREE MEDICAL IN
DEC 2024- RETIREE MEDICAL IN
DEC 2024- RETIREE MEDICAL IN
UB REFUND CST #00060623 - 97
CITY"WIDE ANNUAL CATCH BASI

CLEANING SERVICE OF EQUIPV
PROMOTION CEREMONY & COI's

FOOD, SNACK'S AND DRINKS FC

INVENTORY PO/ BARE BRICK
7/31/2024 JUL2024-EPABROWNFIELDSA
Amount Paid
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
168.13
21 ,075.00
829.82
'195.31

12.88 3,845.39

2.432.50
Check Total
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
168. 13
21,075.00
829.82
208. 19
3,845.39
2,432.50
Page. 8
141
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH G ATE
Page: 9
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description
108803 1/9/2025 00004834
Voucher
108804 1/9/2025 00004857
Voucher:
108805 1/9/2025 00004874
Voucher:
108806 1/9/2025 0012750
Voucher
108807 1/9/2025 00004897
Voucher:
108808 1/9/2025 0014846
Voucher:
108809 1/9/2025 0014838
Voucher:
108810 1/9/2025 0012518
Voucher.
108811 1/9/2025 00003851
Voucher.
108812 1/9/2025 0011640
Voucher
108813 1/9/2025 00003438
Voucher:

SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES SYSR-00546660
R-00525532
R-00529832
S-0 33875
S-0 33863
S-O 35380
S-0 29177
S-0 31985
S-0 29845
S-0 28482
S-0 33856
S-01 33478
0053074
0053171
SO GATE CHAMBER OF COMMEF1556

SMITH FASTENER COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS (0000597978
1 0/1 /2024
7/1 /2024
7/1 /2024
1 0/2/2024
1 0/2/2024
1 0/24/2024
7 /1 6/2024
8/28/2024
7/24/2024
6/28/2024
10/2/2024
9/25/2024
11 /1 9/2024
11 /27/2024
9/30/2024
8/3/2024
ST FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER H7060003658630( 11/19/2024 H7060003613360( 11/19/2024
H7060003606620( 11/19/2024
H7060003427610( 11/19/2024
SUPERIOR WALL SYSTEMS, INC. Ref00036l747 11/27/2024 1 0/1 /24-1 2/31 /24 - FY 2024/ 2025.
7/1/24-9/30/24 - FY 2024/ 2025 Cl
7/1/4-9/30/24 - FY 2024/25: PUBLI

HOLLYDALE RESOURCE CENTE

CITY HALL ACCESS CONTROL S
CIT'f' HALL PERFORM UPDATE
GIRLS CLUBHOUSE CAMERA t-IA

CITY HALL PANL PROGRAMMIN(
TWEEDY RES. PANEL HAS A GEr

AUDITORIUM PANEL PHONE LIN

AUDITORIUM RETURN TRIP REC
10 CREDENTIALS

SPECIALITY HARDWARE

SPECIALITY HARDWARE
7/1 /24-9/30/24 1 ST QTR 2024-202
AUG 2024 - AD PLACED LEGAL h
MEDICAL TREATMENT OF ARRE:

MEDICAL TREATMENT OF ARRE.

MEDICAL TREATMENT OF ARRE.

MEDICAL TREATMENT OF ARRE:

UB REFUND CST #00064890 - 42
SWANNER, TOM Ref000361739

THE HITT COMPANIES

THOMSON REUTERS
OE-135406
OE-135515
851006189
TIREHUB, LLC 45927214
TRANS UNION-SOUTHERN CALI 110403419
10/16/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00065358-81.
11 /7/2024
11 /1 4/2024
11/1/2024
(2) 8 1/2" X 11" SIGNS FOR PARK
(1) K-SERIES ROYAL MARK PRE
OCT 2024 - WEST INFORMATION
11/19/2024 TIRES PURCHASE
10/25/2024 CREDITCHECKPERIOD9/26/24-
Amount Paid
6,442.74
6,442.74
5,953.77
431 .30
283.50
283.50
189.00
189.00
189.00
189.00
189.00

97. 19

41.94 16.47
20,000.00
452.80
1 ,018.99
599.23
573.41
450.41
2 04.28
185.40
214.35

51.49 759.00

1.083.04

83.58 Check Total
20,879.74

58.41 20,000.00
452.80
2,642.04
204.28
185.40
265.84
759.00
1,083.04

83.58 Page. 9
142
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH G ATE
Page: 10
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
108814 1/9/2025 0014834
Voucher.
108815 1/9/2025 0013584
Voucher
108816 1/9/2025 0014828
Voucher
108817 1/9/2025 00002634
Voucher
108818 1/9/2025 0014146
Voucher
108819 1/9/2025 00004423
Voucher
108820 1/9/2025 00002593
Voucher:
108821 1/9/2025 0010471
Voucher.
108822 1/9/2025 0007074
Voucher:
108823 1/9/2025 00000561
Voucher
108824 1/9/2025 0011968
Voucher.
108825 1/9/2025 0012301
Voucher
Invoice
TREVINO, MARIA Ref00036l735
TRUE NORTH COMPLIANCE SER24-11-022 1
24-11-022 2
VARKEY, CINY Ref000361696
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 2346055
2346121
W.G. ZIMMERMAN ENGINEERING24-06-516
24-10-599
WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRI S126819665.001
WAXIE'S SANITARY SUPPLY 82899936
WEBSTER'S BEE'S REMOVAL SR'3332 - Rl
WEST COAST SAND & GRAVEL 1)767683-Rl
WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COM70040280
70031842
70031843
70032385
70031699
70033921
70032188
700321gi

WEX BANK
70033689
70033922
70035194
70032190
70032189
101504238
WHITTIER FERTILIZER COMPAN'i4al7972
417513
Inv Date Description
10/16/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00030584-89
12/1 /2024
12/1 /2024
10/17 /2024
11 /30/2024
11 /30/2024
7/2/2024
11/7/2024
11 /20/2024
NOV 2024 - TRUE NORTH PLAN (
NOV 2024 - LID HOURLY REVIEV'l
UB REFUND CST #00054305 - 96

ASPHALT, BASE, EMULSION PRC

ASPHALT, BASE, EMULSION PRC
JUL 2024 - TRAFFIC ENGINEER E
OCT 2024 - CHRISTMAS PARADE

CONDUIT SHOP INVENTORY
12/4/2024 INVENTORYPO/JANITORIALSU
10/24/2024 BEEREMOVALSERVICEFROMI
9/1 8/2024 RI CK# 1081 77 - CLEANING OIL !
/30/2024
1 2/2024
12/2024
12/2024
12/2024
12/2024
1 2/2024
1 2/2024
12/2024
12/2024
1 2/2024
12/2024
1 2/2024
2 /6/2024
1l /27/2024
11 /1 4/2024

GOPHER CONTROL AT HOLLYD,
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC

GOPHER CONTROL AT HOLLYD,
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
FY 24/25 ANNUAL PEST CONTRC
12/6/24 CLOSING DATE SHELL (

GROUNDS SUPPLIES

GROUNDS SUPPLIES
Amount Paid

40.00 9,869.60
125.00
129.04
249.84
219.00
10,200.00
2,092.50
1 .962.41
9,082.48
250.00
296.88
1 ,950.00
2 95.50
275.00
234.25
228.70
227.15
151.50
121.00

82.50 76.45

56.00 46.50

42.00 651 .22
1,157.63
518.18
Check Total
40 00
9,994.60
129.04
468.84
12,292.50
1 ,962.41
9,082.48
250.00
296.88
3,786.55
651 .22
1 675.81
Page. 10
143
apChkLst
01/09/2025 11:16:21AM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Page: ll
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check# Date Vendor Invoice
108826 1/9/2025 00001280 WILLDAN 00420834
Voucher:
108827 1/9/2025 0007005 WILLDANFINANCIALSERVICES 010-59967 Voucher. 010-60412
108828 1/9/2025 0014203 WILLIAMSSCOTSMAN,INC. 9022345246 Voucher.
108829 1/9/2025 0014832 WOO, MAY Ref000361733
Voucher
108830 1/9/2025 00003442 YOUNGBLOOD & ASSOCIATES, lr2388A Voucher.
108831 1/9/2025 00000062 ZIEGLER'S HARDWARE& SUPPL"Y2294 Voucher: 2271
2080 - 11 /20/24
137 checks in this report.

InvDate Description AmountPaid
11/13/2024 THRU 10/25/24 - CM SERVICES F 31,200.00
10 /10/2024 THRU9/27/24-ASSESSMENTEN
11 /13/2024 THRU10/25/24ASSESSMENTEIS
11/6/2024 YEAR20F2-RENTALOFMOBII
10/16/2024 UBREFUNDCST#00033352-26.
11/6/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPk
7,565.00
3,560.00
1 ,729.01
2 5.00
600.00
11/26/2024 MISCHARDWARE 121.23
11/19/2024 MISCHARDWARE 17.60
11/20/2024 KEYSSHOPEQUIPMENT 11.00
Sub total for BANK OF THE WEST:

Grand Total All Checks:

Check Total
31 ,200.00
11,125.00
1 ,729.01
2 5.00
600.00
149.83
497,301 .46
497 301 .46
Page. 11
144
WARRANT REGISTER FOR COUNCIL MEETING 1/28/2025 PART IV apChkLst
Oill4/2025 4:43:33PM
Final Check List
C}TY OF SOUTH G ATE
Page: I
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST
Check# Date Vendor Invoice
108832 1/16/2025 0012107 CALIFORNIA STATE DlSBURSEMEBen363012 Voucher
108833 1/16/2025 00002138 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben363010 Voucher
Inv Date Description AmountPaid
1/16/2025 CA STATE DISB. UNIT PAYMENT 1 036.44
1/16/2025 GARNISHMENT - FRANCHISE TA I ,483.86
Sub total for BANK OF THE WEST:

Check Total
1 036.44
1 483.86
2,520.30
2 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 2,520.30 F'age 1
145
WARRANT REGISTER FOR COUNCIL MEETING 1/28/2025 PART V apChkLst
01/15/2025 12:32:58PM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Page: 1
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST
Check# Date Vendor Invoice InvDate Description
108834 1/15/2025 00003529 AT&T 960-449-6558-01 1/1/2025 BILLINGPRD-JANUARY2025 Voucher
108835 1/15/2025 0010237 FRONTIERCOMMUNICATIONS 209-057-1084-01 1/1/2025 ACCT#209-057-1084-051106-5, Voucher
108836 1/15/2025 00004869 GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPAh33744100000 - 12, 1/6/2025 BILLING PRD- 12/03/24 -1/03/25 Voucher. 29007447310 - 12. 1/7/2025 BILLING PRD- 12/04/24 -1/6/25 32809400008 - 12. 1/6/2025 BILLING PRD- 12/03/24 -1/03/25 108837 1/15/2025 0010393 GOVINVESTINC. 2024-5935 11/4/2024 11/1/24-10/31/25-PENSIONMOD Voucher
108838 1/15/2025 00001151 LACOUNTYREGISTRAR-RECORCITYPRJ.#709-S 1/8/2024 RECORDINGFEEOFNOTICEOF Voucher
108839 1/15/2025 0014772 LINXLIGHTING&CONTROLS,LLl1051 11/5/2024 SOLARLIGHTFIXTURESFORS1 Voucher
108840 1/15/2025 0014490 MACROAUTOMATICSCORPORA953 1/7/2025 SCADASYSTEMSUPGRADE Voucher
108841 1/15/2025 00004865 SO CALIF EDISON 1/14/2025 1/14/2025 BILLING PERIOD - 10/31/2024 to - Voucher
108842 1/15/2025 0010400 T.EROBERTS,INC 5620 12/31/2024 AUTOMATICWATERMETERUP[ Voucher
Amount Paid
222.55

42.57 1 ,701 .72
91 .93

56.35 10,000.00

75.00 21 873.60
64,327.48
150,684.97
150,833.00
Sub total for BANK OF THE WEST:

Check Total
222.55

42.57 1 ,850.00
10,000.00

75.00 21 873.60
64, 327.48
150,684.97
150,833.00
399,909. 17
9 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 399,909.1 -i Page I
146
WARRANT REGISTER FOR COUNCIL MEETING I /28/2025 PART Vl apChkLst
01/16/2025 1:32:57PM
Check List

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST
Check # Date Vendor
108843
108844
108845
108846
108847
108848
108849
108850
108851
108852
108853
108854
108855
108856
108857
108858
1/28/2025
Voucher.
1 /28/2025
Voucher
1/28/2025
Voucher
1/28/2025
Voucher:
1/28/2025
Voucher:
1 /28/2025
Voucher.
1/28/2025
Voucher
1/28/2025
Voucher:
1/28/2025
Voucher:
1/28/2025
Voucher.
1/28/2025
Voucher
1/28/2025
Voucher:
1/28/2025
Voucher.
1/28/2025
Voucher:
1/28/2025
Voucher:
1/28/2025
Voucher:
0013715
00001467
00004372
0011577
00000706
0007290
00005075
00000201
0013615
0013072
0011669
0011576
00000759
00003548
0012980
0011922
Invoice
A-1 FENCE COMPANY 103124
ADMINISTRATIVE SERV. CO-OP 24ffl9
AIRGAS USA, LLC 9156270847
ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY C 0946-1101005
ALTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. 51551844
APW KNOX-SEEMAN 20615046
Inv Date Description
10/31/2024 THRU 10/31/24-THREE FENCE P(
11 /30/2024 NOV2024-PROVIDEPHONE-A-F
12 /4/2024 SWIMSTADIUMSPAMAINTENAI'l
10 /30/2024 ELECTRICALEQUIPMENT,MATE
11 /20/2024 PARTS&LABOR.LIFTTRUCK&
12 /18/2024 AUTOPARTFORUN1T#195
AT&T

ATLANTIC LOCK & KEY

AUTOLIFT SERVICES, INC

AWP SAFETY

BDO USA LLP
CAL MICROTURBINE, INC.

CALIFORNIA FRAME & AXLE

CDCE,INC

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
22835003
22829890
22833668
000434
1/1/2025
1/1/2025
1/1/2025
12/1 8/2024
BAN 9391081298: 12/01/2024-12/.:

BAN 9391034759: 12/01/2024-12/.:

BAN 9391068970: 12/01/2024-12/:

SPECIALIZED KEYS FOR THE DE
25688 12/26/2024 ANNUALOSHAREQUIREDLIFT!
3428176639 12/18/2024 CHRISTMAS PARADE CLOSURE
002350790 12/19/2024 BDO USA, LLP ACCOUNTING SE
5316 10/23/2024 CO-GENERATION SYSTEM FOR
79952 12/19/2024 REPAIRONUNIT#295(LABORC
143199 11/27/2024 LAPTOPS & RADIOS FOR RANGE
188426501120124 12/1/2024 ACCT# 188426501 - DEC 2024 SC CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERE85294557
85293580
85431021
1 2/11 /2024
1 2/11 /2024
i2/25/2024
12/5/24-12/7/24- MEDICAL SERVI(
12/04/24-12/09/24 - MEDICAL SR'!
12/18/24-12/23/24 - MEDICAL SRt
Amount Paid
1 ,995.00
56,508.66
385.76
1,819.13
1 ,061 .54
230.58
I ,607.36

59.95 1 .766.61
174.22
1 ,449.16
2 6,855.00
1 ,242.50

1.845.00
351 .45
918.75
161.26
898.00
1 ,021 .00
676.00
Page: 7
Check Total
1,995.00
56,508.66
385.76
1,819.13
1 ,061 .54
2 30.58
3,433.92
174.22
1 ,449.16
2 6,855.00
1 ,242.50
1,845.00
351 .45
918.75
161.26
2,595.00

147
apChkLst
01/16/2025 1 :32:57PM
Final Check List

CITY OF SOUTH G ATE
Page: 8
Bank : botw BANK OF THE WEST (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
108859 1/28/2025 0014673
Voucher
108860 1/28/2025 0014486
Voucher
108861 1/28/2025 0010352
Voucher
108862 1/28/2025 00003660
Voucher.
108863 1/28/2025 00001423
Voucher:
108864 1/28/2025 0013681
Voucher
108865 1/28/2025 0012407
Voucher:
108866 1/28/2025 0005434
Voucher:
108867 1/28/2025 00000619
Voucher:
108868 1/28/2025 0013912
Voucher
108869 1/28/2025 0005869
Voucher
108870 1/28/2025 00003770
Voucher
Invoice
CORE & MAIN LP V727840
COUNCIL FOR WATERSHED HEA2 CWH 3001

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CRAFCO INC.
1N1429183
1N1429185
1N1429186
1N1425036
1N1429184
9403317394
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION B3880635

DANIELS TIRE SERVICE, INC

DAVIS FARR LLP
B3880841
B3880633
200517125
200513065
200513063
2396
DOWNEY SUPERIOR COURT 14002
FALCON FUELS, INC. 79157
79048
FAST DEER BUS CHARTER, INC. 12120
12285
q 1927
12203
0040847FERGUSON WATERWORKS
FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 21791
Inv Date Descrmtion
11/8/2024 METER VALVES FOR MTR REPL
12/20/2024 7/1/24-12/20/24-WATERMAINRE
1/1 3/2024
1/1 3/2024
1/13/2024
1/13/2024
1/13/2024
O/1 6/2024
1/1/2025
12/1 9/2024
1/1/2025
9/24/2024
8/7/2024
8/7/2024
12/1 0/2024
FACILITY ID# FAO233339 - BACKF
FACILITY ID# FAO233336 - BACKF
FACILITY ID# FAO233335 - BACKF
FACILITY ID# FAO204384 - BACKF
FACILITY ID# FAO233337 - BACKF

COLD PATCH FOR POTHOLES C

SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTS TC
9923 SAN LUIS AVE PARKING LO

SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTS TC

TIRES FOR GARAGE SHOP STOI
TIRE DISPOSAL 8/1/24
TIRE DISPOSAL 8/1/24
FY2024-25 AUDIT
12/28/2024 3/28/2025BAILAPPEARANCEIN
2/1 9/2024
2/1 7/2024
2/5/2024
/4/2025
1 /7/2024
2 /1 3/2024
2/1 0/2024
REG UNLEADED 10% ETH FUEL
REG UNLEADED 10% ETH FUEL

VIEJAS CASINO & RESORT - BUE
LONG BEACH ARENA - BUSES Fl

MORONGO CASINO RESORT & E

DAVEY'S LOCKER WHALE WATC

INVENTORY PO/ COPPER
9/18/2024 UNDERGROUNDSTORAGETANI
Amount Paid

1.927.80
35,826.35

37.00 37.00

74.00 74.00
296.00
6,214.30
800.00
985.00
875.00
359.14
300.00
390.10
18,610.00
50,000.00
5,956.00
1 ,491 .55
2 ,760.00

1.380.00
2,760.00
1 .610.00
6,241 .50
560.00
Check Total
1,927.80
35,826.35
518.00
6,214.30
2,660.00
1,049.24
18,610.00
50,000.00
7,447.55
8,510.00
6,241 .50
560.00