Agenda packet, first session — South Lake Tahoe City Council, January 18, 2022 (part 4 of 4)

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 44.8836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 45.0545 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1808 0.0857 1.5017 4.5700e0030.5748 2.4500e0030.5772 0.1524 2.2600e0030.1547 462.1981 462.1981 8.8000e0039.7500e003465.3234 Total 0.1808 0.0857 1.5017 4.5700e0030.5748 2.4500e0030.5772 0.1524 2.2600e0030.1547 462.1981 462.1981 8.8000e0039.7500e003465.3234 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 47 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 733

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 44.8836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 45.0545 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1699 0.0781 1.4174 4.4500e0030.5748 2.2900e0030.5771 0.1524 2.1100e0030.1545 449.7530 449.7530 8.0300e0039.2500e003452.7092 Total 0.1699 0.0781 1.4174 4.4500e0030.5748 2.2900e0030.5771 0.1524 2.1100e0030.1545 449.7530 449.7530 8.0300e0039.2500e003452.7092 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 48 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 734

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 44.8836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 45.0545 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1699 0.0781 1.4174 4.4500e0030.5748 2.2900e0030.5771 0.1524 2.1100e0030.1545 449.7530 449.7530 8.0300e0039.2500e003452.7092 Total 0.1699 0.0781 1.4174 4.4500e0030.5748 2.2900e0030.5771 0.1524 2.1100e0030.1545 449.7530 449.7530 8.0300e0039.2500e003452.7092 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 49 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 735

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 4.7915 1.3331 23.9816 0.0116 1.3444 9.1400e0031.3536 0.3885 6.3100e0030.3948 1,179.718 6 1,179.718
6 0.1399 0.0742 1,205.334
8 Unmitigated 4.7915 1.3331 23.9816 0.0116 1.3444 9.1400e0031.3536 0.3885 6.3100e0030.3948 1,179.718 6 1,179.718
6 0.1399 0.0742 1,205.334
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Arena 58.28 58.28 58.28 66,406 66,406
Arena 165.90 165.90 165.90 189,037 189,037
City Park 449.20 449.20 449.20 311,318 311,318
Government (Civic Center) 224.50 224.50 224.50 125,601 125,601 Motel 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 897.87 897.87 897.87 692,362 692,362
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Arena 4.28 4.28 4.28 0.00 81.00 19.00 66 28 6
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 50 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 736
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Arena 4.28 4.28 4.28 0.00 81.00 19.00 66 28 6
City Park 2.60 2.60 2.60 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Government (Civic Center) 2.60 2.60 2.60 75.00 20.00 5.00 50 34 16 Motel 47.40 47.40 47.40 19.00 62.00 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 14.70 6.60 6.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Arena 0.493892 0.059218 0.219804 0.141013 0.027602 0.005981 0.012190 0.004071 0.000638 0.000674 0.030860 0.000950 0.003108 City Park 0.493892 0.059218 0.219804 0.141013 0.027602 0.005981 0.012190 0.004071 0.000638 0.000674 0.030860 0.000950 0.003108 Government (Civic Center) 0.493892 0.059218 0.219804 0.141013 0.027602 0.005981 0.012190 0.004071 0.000638 0.000674 0.030860 0.000950 0.003108 Motel 0.493892 0.059218 0.219804 0.141013 0.027602 0.005981 0.012190 0.004071 0.000638 0.000674 0.030860 0.000950 0.003108 Parking Lot 0.493892 0.059218 0.219804 0.141013 0.027602 0.005981 0.012190 0.004071 0.000638 0.000674 0.030860 0.000950 0.003108

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 51 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 737
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0431 0.3915 0.3289 2.3500e0030.0298 0.0298 0.0298 0.0298 469.7826 469.7826 9.0000e0038.6100e003472.5743 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0431 0.3915 0.3289 2.3500e0030.0298 0.0298 0.0298 0.0298 469.7826 469.7826 9.0000e0038.6100e003472.5743 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 52 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 738

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Arena 234.447 2.5300e0030.0230 0.0193 1.4000e0041.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e00327.5820 27.5820 5.3000e0045.1000e00427.7459 Arena 667.397 7.2000e0030.0654 0.0550 3.9000e0044.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e00378.5173 78.5173 1.5000e0031.4400e00378.9839 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Government
(Civic Center)
1324.66 0.0143 0.1299 0.1091 7.8000e0049.8700e0039.8700e0039.8700e0039.8700e003155.8421 155.8421 2.9900e0032.8600e003156.7682 Motel 1766.65 0.0191 0.1732 0.1455 1.0400e0030.0132 0.0132 0.0132 0.0132 207.8412 207.8412 3.9800e0033.8100e003209.0763 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0431 0.3915 0.3289 2.3500e0030.0298 0.0298 0.0298 0.0298 469.7826 469.7826 9.0000e0038.6200e003472.5743 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 53 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 739

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Arena 0.234447 2.5300e0030.0230 0.0193 1.4000e0041.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e00327.5820 27.5820 5.3000e0045.1000e00427.7459 Arena 0.667397 7.2000e0030.0654 0.0550 3.9000e0044.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e0034.9700e00378.5173 78.5173 1.5000e0031.4400e00378.9839 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Government
(Civic Center)

1.32466 0.0143 0.1299 0.1091 7.8000e0049.8700e0039.8700e0039.8700e0039.8700e003155.8421 155.8421 2.9900e0032.8600e003156.7682 Motel 1.76665 0.0191 0.1732 0.1455 1.0400e0030.0132 0.0132 0.0132 0.0132 207.8412 207.8412 3.9800e0033.8100e003209.0763 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0431 0.3915 0.3289 2.3500e0030.0298 0.0298 0.0298 0.0298 469.7826 469.7826 9.0000e0038.6200e003472.5743 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 54 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 740
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 4.3377 6.9000e0040.0767 1.0000e0052.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0040.1654 0.1654 4.3000e0040.1761 Unmitigated 4.3377 6.9000e0040.0767 1.0000e0052.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0040.1654 0.1654 4.3000e0040.1761

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.0055 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.3252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 7.0200e0036.9000e0040.0767 1.0000e0052.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0040.1654 0.1654 4.3000e0040.1761 Total 4.3377 6.9000e0040.0767 1.0000e0052.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0040.1654 0.1654 4.3000e0040.1761 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 55 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 741

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

1.0055 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.3252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 7.0200e0036.9000e0040.0767 1.0000e0052.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0040.1654 0.1654 4.3000e0040.1761 Total 4.3377 6.9000e0040.0767 1.0000e0052.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0042.7000e0040.1654 0.1654 4.3000e0040.1761 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 56 of 57 Date: 11/3/2021 2:05 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 742

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

Land Use - Gross floor area of the Recreation center - 64.222 ksf (Including Aquatics facilities - 2.5 ksf) Construction Phase -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Health Club 61.72 1000sqft 1.42 61,722.00 0
Recreational Swimming Pool 2.50 1000sqft 0.06 2,500.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Rural
14 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.7 Precipitation Freq (Days) 70

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company User Defined
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
535.7 CH4 Intensity 0.026
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.003
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 744
Demolition -
Grading -
Architectural Coating - SMAQMD recommends using paint with new VOC contents for archetectural coating. For the modeling, Nonflat Coating's VOC limit of 100 g/l is assumed.

Vehicle Trips - Daily VMT data provided by the traffic study Vehicle Emission Factors - Using 2021 EMFAC EF
Vehicle Emission Factors - Using 2021 EMFAC EF
Vehicle Emission Factors - Using 2021 EMFAC EF
Consumer Products -
Area Coating -
Water And Wastewater -
Area Mitigation -
Fleet Mix -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0 0.026
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 535.7
tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0 0.003
tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.25
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.6220e-003 5.2630e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.76 0.18
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 0.20
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 39.17
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,023.57 1,534.53
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 745
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,625.74 1,404.88
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.39 0.02
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.25 0.22
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.98 41.71
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.29 3.07
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.06 2.99
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.6820e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.4360e-003 5.6530e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.5850e-003 8.9570e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.2000e-005 3.0400e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9100e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.41 2.84
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.05 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.8000e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.6700e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.2000e-005 3.0400e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 746
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9100e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.47 3.36
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.8000e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.26
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.6320e-003 5.2700e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.66 0.18
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.44 0.20
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 38.40
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,017.67 1,519.17
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,625.75 1,404.88
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.38 0.02
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.25 0.22
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.81 40.59
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.13 2.94
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.06 2.99
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.8660e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.6560e-003 4.8810e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.5850e-003 8.9570e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 747
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.4000e-005 4.0700e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.4300e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 2.98
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.4000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.05 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.7500e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.6140e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.4000e-005 4.0700e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.4300e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.49 3.51
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.4000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.7500e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.6140e-003 5.2580e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.91 0.18
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 0.20
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 40.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,031.73 1,555.74
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,625.73 1,404.88
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.39 0.02
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 748
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.25 0.22
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.22 43.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.34 3.10
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.06 2.99
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.8090e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.5140e-003 6.7180e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.5850e-003 8.9570e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0000e-006 2.8940e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9200e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.38 2.65
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.05 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.1500e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.7470e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0000e-006 2.8940e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9200e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.44 3.14
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 749
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.1500e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.0210e-003 2.6200e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.00 0.82
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.60 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.27 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDA 247.75 244.91
tblVehicleEF LDA 51.41 52.50
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.4630e-003 6.0800e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.18 0.28
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 8.0800e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.4900e-003 1.4340e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7910e-003 2.1330e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.3730e-003 1.7560e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.6470e-003 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 1.60
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 7.7970e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.22 0.37
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.4010e-003 2.4220e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.9800e-004 5.2000e-004
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 1.60
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.12
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 750
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.24 0.41
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.3190e-003 2.8440e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.00 1.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.72 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.74 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDA 269.38 244.17
tblVehicleEF LDA 50.39 51.42
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.1150e-003 5.5460e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.16 0.24
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 8.0800e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.4900e-003 1.4340e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7910e-003 2.1330e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.3730e-003 1.7560e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.6470e-003 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.12 2.26
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.11 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 8.7420e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.17 0.29
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.6110e-003 2.4150e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.8900e-004 5.0900e-004
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.12 2.26
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 751
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.11 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.19 0.32
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.9200e-003 2.5250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.06 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.00 0.76
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.58 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.67 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDA 242.38 244.18
tblVehicleEF LDA 52.15 53.25
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.6770e-003 6.4250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.19 0.30
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 8.0800e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.4900e-003 1.4340e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7910e-003 2.1330e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.3730e-003 1.7560e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.6470e-003 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 1.43
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 8.8240e-003 1.4510e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 7.5100e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.25 0.42
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.3490e-003 2.4150e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 5.0600e-004 5.2700e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 752
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 1.43
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 8.8240e-003 1.4510e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.27 0.46
tblVehicleEF LDT1 5.3240e-003 8.1190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.15
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.00 1.87
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.18 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.66 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT1 306.97 310.60
tblVehicleEF LDT1 66.37 68.35
tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.7090e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.17
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.31 0.54
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.9650e-003 2.2410e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.6990e-003 3.8680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.8090e-003 2.2650e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.4820e-003 2.7540e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.15 4.11
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.27 0.31
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.48 0.87
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.9760e-003 3.0740e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 753
tblVehicleEF LDT1 6.4300e-004 6.7600e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.15 4.11
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.27 0.31
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.52 0.95
tblVehicleEF LDT1 6.0510e-003 8.7930e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.07 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.00 2.47
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.39 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT1 329.22 309.77
tblVehicleEF LDT1 65.00 66.90
tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.0170e-003 9.4050e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.14
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.28 0.48
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.9650e-003 2.2410e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.6990e-003 3.8680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.8090e-003 2.2650e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.4820e-003 2.7540e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.46 5.93
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.34 0.32
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.22 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.37 0.68
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 754
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.1920e-003 3.0650e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 6.3000e-004 6.6200e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.46 5.93
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.34 0.32
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.22 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.41 0.75
tblVehicleEF LDT1 5.0800e-003 7.8400e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.17
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.00 1.74
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.15 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.13 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT1 301.43 309.85
tblVehicleEF LDT1 67.36 69.33
tblVehicleEF LDT1 8.1300e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.11 0.19
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.34 0.59
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.9650e-003 2.2410e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.6990e-003 3.8680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.8090e-003 2.2650e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.4820e-003 2.7540e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 3.60
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.28 0.33
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 3.9370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.17 0.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 755
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.54 0.99
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.9220e-003 3.0660e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 6.5300e-004 6.8600e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 3.60
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.28 0.33
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 3.9370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.17 0.20
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.60 1.09
tblVehicleEF LDT2 4.1340e-003 3.1630e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.00 0.97
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.97 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.15 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT2 332.07 345.49
tblVehicleEF LDT2 72.07 76.14
tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.3900e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.35 0.41
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 9.7250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.5570e-003 1.4450e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.9590e-003 2.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.4330e-003 1.7190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8010e-003 1.9390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 1.73
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.18 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 756
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.42 0.49
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.2190e-003 3.4180e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.9900e-004 7.5300e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 1.73
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.18 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.46 0.53
tblVehicleEF LDT2 4.6930e-003 3.4320e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.00 1.28
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.14 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.41 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT2 353.44 344.68
tblVehicleEF LDT2 70.57 74.53
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.7620e-003 9.5910e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.31 0.36
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 9.7250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.5570e-003 1.4450e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.9590e-003 2.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.4330e-003 1.7190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8010e-003 1.9390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.27 2.35
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.21 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.15 0.06
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 757
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.33 0.38
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.4260e-003 3.4100e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.8400e-004 7.3800e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.27 2.35
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.21 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.15 0.06
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.36 0.42
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.9400e-003 3.0480e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.00 0.90
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.94 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.70 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT2 326.74 344.73
tblVehicleEF LDT2 73.15 77.25
tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.7750e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.38 0.45
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 9.7250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.5570e-003 1.4450e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.9590e-003 2.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.4330e-003 1.7190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8010e-003 1.9390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 1.57
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 758
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 3.0500e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.48 0.55
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.1670e-003 3.4100e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.0900e-004 7.6400e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 1.57
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.24
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 3.0500e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.53 0.60
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.8970e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 1.34
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.42 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.01 2.18
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.69 9.48
tblVehicleEF LHD1 762.97 799.85
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.19 11.50
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0100e-003 8.6900e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 1.32
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.08 1.82
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.26 0.31
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1550e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 759
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6000e-004 2.2800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1050e-003 9.1200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5610e-003 2.4990e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3900e-004 3.4700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3960e-003 1.83
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.09 0.13
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.26
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-004 6.7800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.37 0.59
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-005 9.2000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.4080e-003 7.7890e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.1000e-005 1.1400e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3960e-003 1.83
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.09 0.13
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-004 6.7800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.19 0.23
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.37 0.59
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.9130e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 1.38
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.46 0.09
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 760
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.90 2.18
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.69 9.48
tblVehicleEF LHD1 763.03 800.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.00 11.12
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0130e-003 8.7200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 1.32
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.96 1.72
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.24 0.29
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1550e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6000e-004 2.2800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1050e-003 9.1200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5610e-003 2.4990e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3900e-004 3.4700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.0290e-003 2.50
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.11 0.13
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.26
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.2240e-003 1.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.36 0.55
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-005 9.2000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.4090e-003 7.7900e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.9000e-005 1.1000e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 761
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.0290e-003 2.50
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.11 0.13
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.2240e-003 1.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.20 0.23
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.36 0.55
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.8870e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 1.32
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.40 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.08 2.18
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.69 9.48
tblVehicleEF LHD1 762.92 799.74
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.32 11.70
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0080e-003 8.6700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 1.32
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.10 1.84
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.28 0.33
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1550e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6000e-004 2.2800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1050e-003 9.1200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5610e-003 2.4990e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 762
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3900e-004 3.4700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.1000e-004 1.64
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.26
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.1700e-004 8.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.41 0.65
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-005 9.2000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.4080e-003 7.7880e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.2000e-005 1.1600e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.1000e-004 1.64
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.1700e-004 8.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.19 0.22
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.41 0.65
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.09 0.11
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.8220e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.2350e-003 9.0000e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.7120e-003 5.1890e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.63
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.86 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.34 1.34
tblVehicleEF LHD2 16.04 15.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 721.68 769.54
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.06 6.64
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.2840e-003 2.0090e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 763
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.6360e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 1.89
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.86 1.54
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.10
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7450e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.0000e-005 4.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.6690e-003 1.4780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.8250e-003 2.7500e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.4000e-005 1.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.4400e-004 0.42
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.16
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.3400e-004 2.6200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.18
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5200e-004 1.4500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.9100e-003 7.4040e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.0000e-005 6.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.4400e-004 0.42
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.3400e-004 2.6200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.18 0.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 764
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.8280e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.2950e-003 9.0440e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.3730e-003 4.8250e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.64
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.86 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.30 1.34
tblVehicleEF LHD2 16.04 15.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 721.69 769.57
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.00 6.48
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.2850e-003 2.0110e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.2480e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 1.89
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.77 1.46
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7450e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.0000e-005 4.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.6690e-003 1.4780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.8250e-003 2.7500e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.4000e-005 1.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5620e-003 0.56
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.16
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 765
tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.4600e-004 4.5700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.18
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.14
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5200e-004 1.4500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.9100e-003 7.4040e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.0000e-005 6.4000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5620e-003 0.56
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.4600e-004 4.5700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.18 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.14
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.8180e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.1930e-003 8.9700e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.9400e-003 5.4330e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.63
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.85 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.36 1.34
tblVehicleEF LHD2 16.04 15.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 721.67 769.51
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.10 6.72
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.2830e-003 2.0080e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.9540e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 1.89
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.88 1.56
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 766
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7450e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.0000e-005 4.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.6690e-003 1.4780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.8250e-003 2.7500e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.4000e-005 1.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7500e-004 0.38
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.16
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.2000e-005 3.4000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.18
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.17
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5200e-004 1.4500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.9100e-003 7.4040e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.1000e-005 6.7000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7500e-004 0.38
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.2000e-005 3.4000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.18 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.17
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.36 0.22
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.28 0.24
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.00 17.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 767
tblVehicleEF MCY 21.89 8.4200e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 9.74 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 216.40 223.35
tblVehicleEF MCY 65.63 73.13
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.07 0.07
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.21 0.74
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.28 0.19
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0160e-003 1.9560e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.1380e-003 3.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.8900e-003 2.0980e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9630e-003 3.3090e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.16 5.50
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.95 0.81
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.54 0.19
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.54 1.53
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.03 0.83
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.24 1.88
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1410e-003 2.2100e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.4900e-004 7.2400e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.16 5.50
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.95 0.81
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.54 0.19
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.09 1.80
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.03 0.83
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.43 2.05
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.34 0.21
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.22 0.19
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 768
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.00 16.75
tblVehicleEF MCY 20.77 8.4200e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 8.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 214.12 217.02
tblVehicleEF MCY 61.31 65.04
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.06 0.07
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.02 0.62
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.25 0.17
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0160e-003 1.9560e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.1380e-003 3.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.8900e-003 2.0980e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9630e-003 3.3090e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.88 9.23
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.46 0.83
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.61 0.33
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.40 1.46
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.99 0.76
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.72 1.44
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1190e-003 2.1480e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.0700e-004 6.4400e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.88 9.23
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.46 0.83
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.61 0.33
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.92 1.72
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.99 0.76
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.87 1.57
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.37 0.22
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 769
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.33 0.28
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.00 18.05
tblVehicleEF MCY 23.58 8.4200e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 11.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 219.53 227.17
tblVehicleEF MCY 69.05 77.44
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.07 0.07
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.29 0.78
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.30 0.20
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0160e-003 1.9560e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.1380e-003 3.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.8900e-003 2.0980e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9630e-003 3.3090e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.25 4.51
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.04 0.92
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.13 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.67 1.60
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.19 0.97
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.62 2.21
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1720e-003 2.2480e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.8300e-004 7.6600e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.25 4.51
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.04 0.92
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.13 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.24 1.88
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.19 0.97
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.85 2.40
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 770
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.3610e-003 4.3240e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.13
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.00 1.13
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.97 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 400.27 409.93
tblVehicleEF MDV 86.32 90.72
tblVehicleEF MDV 9.2270e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.12
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.39 0.55
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 9.8980e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6690e-003 1.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0180e-003 2.4250e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5420e-003 1.9070e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.8560e-003 2.1470e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 2.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.19 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.11
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.49 0.69
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.8780e-003 4.0510e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.3700e-004 8.9800e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 2.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.19 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.11
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 771
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.54 0.75
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.9620e-003 4.6910e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.00 1.50
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.14 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.68 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 422.16 409.07
tblVehicleEF MDV 84.61 88.79
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.5790e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.35 0.49
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 9.8980e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6690e-003 1.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0180e-003 2.4250e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5420e-003 1.9070e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.8560e-003 2.1470e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.29 3.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.17 0.06
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.39 0.54
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.0900e-003 4.0420e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.2000e-004 8.7900e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.29 3.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.17 0.06
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 772
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.43 0.59
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.1590e-003 4.1690e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.00 1.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.94 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.14 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 394.82 409.15
tblVehicleEF MDV 87.55 92.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 9.6230e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.13
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.43 0.60
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 9.8980e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6690e-003 1.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0180e-003 2.4250e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5420e-003 1.9070e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.8560e-003 2.1470e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 2.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.20 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 3.4740e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.56 0.78
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.8250e-003 4.0430e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.4900e-004 9.1100e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 2.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.20 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 3.4740e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 773
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.62 0.85
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.00 1.12
tblVehicleEF MH 1.32 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 2.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,556.51 1,571.75
tblVehicleEF MH 17.47 19.72
tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 2.17 2.05
tblVehicleEF MH 0.24 0.29
tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.04
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.2800e-004 2.5000e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 3.3390e-003 3.3180e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 2.9300e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 0.75 3.05
tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.22 0.17
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 1.7300e-004 1.9500e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 774
tblVehicleEF MH 0.75 3.05
tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.22 0.17
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.11
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.00 1.17
tblVehicleEF MH 1.38 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 1.78 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,556.60 1,572.02
tblVehicleEF MH 17.04 18.99
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 2.03 1.92
tblVehicleEF MH 0.22 0.27
tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.04
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.2800e-004 2.5000e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 3.3390e-003 3.3180e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 2.9300e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 2.19 4.24
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.49 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 775
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 1.6900e-004 1.8800e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 2.19 4.24
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.49 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.12
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.00 1.09
tblVehicleEF MH 1.29 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 2.20 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,556.44 1,571.55
tblVehicleEF MH 17.75 20.12
tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 2.21 2.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.26 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.04
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.2800e-004 2.5000e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 3.3390e-003 3.3180e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 2.9300e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 0.24 2.73
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.09
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 776
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 1.7600e-004 1.9900e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 0.24 2.73
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.11
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.11 0.12
tblVehicleEF MHD 3.3600e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.1250e-003 2.5480e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.8450e-003 3.7150e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.58 0.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.27 0.20
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.16 8.14
tblVehicleEF MHD 139.17 142.79
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,082.52 1,113.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.62 11.86
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.15
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.2130e-003 7.9990e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.89 13.26
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.79 1.09
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.74 1.62
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.3100e-004 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.05
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 777
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.5570e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1700e-004 5.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.9900e-004 8.4100e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.1380e-003 8.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 1.4300e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.3100e-004 0.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.30
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.7600e-004 1.5400e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3170e-003 1.3520e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.5000e-005 1.1700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.3100e-004 0.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.37
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.7600e-004 1.5400e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 3.1990e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.1860e-003 2.6160e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.1930e-003 3.4390e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.51 0.26
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.28 0.20
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.03 7.55
tblVehicleEF MHD 139.17 143.24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 778
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,082.53 1,113.08
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.39 11.35
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.15
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.9090e-003 7.4930e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.88 12.96
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.70 1.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.73 1.61
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.2300e-004 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.5570e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1700e-004 5.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.9600e-004 7.1500e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.1380e-003 8.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 1.4300e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2790e-003 0.39
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.30
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.3400e-004 2.6700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3180e-003 1.3570e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.3000e-005 1.1200e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2790e-003 0.39
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.3400e-004 2.6700e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 779
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 3.5160e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.0810e-003 2.4990e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.2990e-003 3.9060e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.64 0.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.27 0.20
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.26 8.82
tblVehicleEF MHD 139.27 142.32
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,082.51 1,113.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.77 12.14
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.15
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.4780e-003 8.3090e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.91 13.67
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.81 1.11
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.74 1.62
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.8000e-004 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.5570e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1700e-004 5.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.4200e-004 1.0150e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.1380e-003 8.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 1.4300e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2800e-004 0.22
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.30
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.8000e-005 2.0000e-005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 37 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 780
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3180e-003 1.3480e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.7000e-005 1.2000e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2800e-004 0.22
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.8000e-005 2.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.06 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.4360e-003 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.8750e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 9.6100e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.65 0.70
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.86 0.17
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.78 8.47
tblVehicleEF OBUS 101.76 183.31
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,372.58 1,475.89
tblVehicleEF OBUS 18.07 16.49
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.41 6.86
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.60 1.68
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.00 1.29
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.3800e-004 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 38 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 781
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.0190e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0400e-004 7.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.3200e-004 2.6200e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.6140e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8800e-004 1.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.5930e-003 0.89
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.63
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.4800e-004 3.6800e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.12 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.6700e-004 1.7370e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.7900e-004 1.6300e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.5930e-003 0.89
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.80
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.4800e-004 3.6800e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.13
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.06
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.5440e-003 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.1540e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 8.8650e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.65 0.72
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.90 0.17
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.43 8.31
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 39 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 782
tblVehicleEF OBUS 100.55 181.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,372.64 1,475.96
tblVehicleEF OBUS 17.48 15.82
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.39 6.59
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.51 1.60
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.98 1.28
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.2200e-004 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.0190e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0400e-004 7.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1700e-004 2.3200e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.6140e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8800e-004 1.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 4.4540e-003 1.34
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.65
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1940e-003 6.5300e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.11 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.5500e-004 1.7150e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.7300e-004 1.5700e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 4.4540e-003 1.34
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 40 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 783
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1940e-003 6.5300e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.13
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.12 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.3080e-003 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.6770e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.66 0.69
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.84 0.17
tblVehicleEF OBUS 3.01 8.69
tblVehicleEF OBUS 103.44 186.48
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,372.54 1,475.84
tblVehicleEF OBUS 18.46 16.86
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.44 7.24
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.62 1.70
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.01 1.30
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.5900e-004 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.0190e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0400e-004 7.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.5200e-004 3.0200e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.6140e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8800e-004 1.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.6800e-004 0.81
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.60
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 41 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 784
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.2000e-004 5.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.06
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.8300e-004 1.7670e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8300e-004 1.6700e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.6800e-004 0.81
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.76
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.2000e-004 5.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.13
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.14 0.06
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.42
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 9.4050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.4210e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.31 0.98
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.85 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.63 17.91
tblVehicleEF SBUS 329.50 320.63
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,098.41 1,108.97
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.45 1.16
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.16
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.8320e-003 1.1770e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.86 20.97
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.11 4.61
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.76 0.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 42 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 785
tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0480e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.5000e-005 1.7400e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.8290e-003 5.3920e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.8640e-003 2.9050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.2000e-005 1.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.6000e-004 0.83
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.7890e-003 7.3000e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 2.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.4600e-004 1.7000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.1250e-003 3.0350e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.4000e-005 1.1000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.6000e-004 0.83
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.7890e-003 7.3000e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.18 2.88
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.4600e-004 1.7000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.15 0.11
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.13
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.42
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 9.6850e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6630e-003 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 43 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 786
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.27 1.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.87 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.40 17.68
tblVehicleEF SBUS 339.85 331.74
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,098.45 1,108.98
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.07 1.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.16
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.7190e-003 1.1050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.96 21.39
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.74 4.36
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.76 0.47
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.2620e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.5000e-005 1.7400e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.0780e-003 4.5510e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.8640e-003 2.9050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.2000e-005 1.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9390e-003 1.46
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 7.3600e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 2.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.0100e-004 2.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 1.5350e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.2230e-003 3.1400e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 44 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 787
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.0000e-005 1.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9390e-003 1.46
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 7.3600e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.18 2.88
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.0100e-004 2.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.15 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 1.5350e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.10
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.42
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.9210e-003 9.2250e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.8640e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.37 0.96
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.83 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.77 18.22
tblVehicleEF SBUS 315.21 305.28
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,098.38 1,108.97
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.68 1.24
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.16
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.9210e-003 1.2290e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.73 20.39
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.19 4.66
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.76 0.49
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.1330e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.5000e-005 1.7400e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 45 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 788
tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.8680e-003 6.5530e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.8640e-003 2.9050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.2000e-005 1.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9000e-004 0.69
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.9230e-003 7.3600e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 2.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.0200e-004 3.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 2.4220e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.13
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9900e-003 2.8900e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.7000e-005 1.2000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9000e-004 0.69
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.9230e-003 7.3600e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.18 2.88
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.0200e-004 3.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.15 0.11
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 2.4220e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.83 2.9490e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.00 0.12
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.45 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,562.30 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 30.90 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.15 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 46 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 789
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.43 0.29
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.29 0.27
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0130e-003 4.5220e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1700e-004 2.7200e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.0200e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.8030e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9200e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1700e-003 0.13
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.1700e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0160e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.16 0.17
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0600e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1700e-003 0.13
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.1700e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.86 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0160e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.17 0.18
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.83 3.0010e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.00 0.13
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.45 0.14
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 47 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 790
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.28 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,562.31 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 29.67 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.14 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.41 0.28
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.26 0.25
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0130e-003 4.5220e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1700e-004 2.7200e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.0200e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.8030e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9200e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.5480e-003 0.25
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.3380e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.8260e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9400e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.5480e-003 0.25
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.3380e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.86 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.8260e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.15 0.16
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 48 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 791
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.83 2.9140e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.00 0.12
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.45 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,562.29 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 31.76 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.15 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.43 0.29
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.30 0.29
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0130e-003 4.5220e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1700e-004 2.7200e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.0200e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.8030e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9200e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.7300e-004 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8800e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.7740e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.17 0.19
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1400e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.7300e-004 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 49 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 792

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8800e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.86 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.7740e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.19 0.20
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 6.60 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 6.60 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.60 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.60 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 14.70 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 14.70 2.60
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 20.87 3.63
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.10 0.15
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 26.73 3.63
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 13.60 0.15
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 32.93 3.63
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 28.82 0.15
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 50 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 793

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0226 0.2378 0.1753 3.8000e0040.0433 0.0107 0.0540 0.0137 9.9400e0030.0237 0.0000 34.1044 34.1044 7.1000e0031.0300e00334.5898 2023 0.4573 1.2836 1.4410 2.8100e0030.0406 0.0539 0.0945 0.0110 0.0520 0.0629 0.0000 238.0646 238.0646 0.0336 4.0200e003240.1020 Maximum 0.4573 1.2836 1.4410 2.8100e0030.0433 0.0539 0.0945 0.0137 0.0520 0.0629 0.0000 238.0646 238.0646 0.0336 4.0200e003240.1020 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0226 0.2378 0.1753 3.8000e0040.0433 0.0107 0.0540 0.0137 9.9400e0030.0237 0.0000 34.1044 34.1044 7.1000e0031.0300e00334.5898 2023 0.4573 1.2836 1.4410 2.8100e0030.0406 0.0539 0.0945 0.0110 0.0520 0.0629 0.0000 238.0644 238.0644 0.0336 4.0200e003240.1018 Maximum 0.4573 1.2836 1.4410 2.8100e0030.0433 0.0539 0.0945 0.0137 0.0520 0.0629 0.0000 238.0644 238.0644 0.0336 4.0200e003240.1018 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 51 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 794
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 0.2702 0.2702
5 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 0.4548 0.4548
6 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 0.4582 0.4582
7 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.4632 0.4632
Highest 0.4632 0.4632

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.3126 1.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1500e0031.1500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.2200e003 Energy 1.1600e0030.0105 8.8400e0036.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 74.7528 74.7528 3.2900e0035.6000e00475.0034 Mobile 0.2755 0.1111 0.1873 5.7000e0040.0448 9.3000e0040.0457 0.0130 6.8000e0040.0137 0.0000 52.6813 52.6813 9.9300e0035.1000e00354.4500 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 74.3048 0.0000 74.3048 4.3913 0.0000 184.0871 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2050 6.9737 8.1787 0.1241 2.9600e00312.1637 Total 0.5893 0.1216 0.1967 6.3000e0040.0448 1.7300e0030.0465 0.0130 1.4800e0030.0145 75.5098 134.4089 209.9188 4.5286 8.6200e003325.7054 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 52 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 795

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 53 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 796
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/1/2023 10/6/2023 5 200 5 Paving Paving 10/7/2023 10/20/2023 5 10
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/21/2023 11/3/2023 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 92,583; Non-Residential Outdoor: 30,861; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 54 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 797

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0195 0.0000 0.0195 2.9500e0030.0000 2.9500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0048.3800e0038.3800e0037.8300e0037.8300e0030.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2120 Total 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0040.0195 8.3800e0030.0279 2.9500e0037.8300e0030.0108 0.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2120 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 177.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 27.00 11.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 55 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 798

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.9000e0040.0224 3.2300e0037.0000e0051.4800e0031.7000e0041.6500e0034.1000e0041.6000e0045.6000e0040.0000 6.2848 6.2848 2.0000e0059.8000e0046.5788 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.6000e0044.9000e0045.6700e0031.0000e0051.5900e0031.0000e0051.6000e0034.2000e0041.0000e0054.3000e0040.0000 1.3246 1.3246 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.3374 Total 1.1500e0030.0229 8.9000e0038.0000e0053.0700e0031.8000e0043.2500e0038.3000e0041.7000e0049.9000e0040.0000 7.6094 7.6094 6.0000e0051.0200e0037.9162 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0195 0.0000 0.0195 2.9500e0030.0000 2.9500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0048.3800e0038.3800e0037.8300e0037.8300e0030.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2119 Total 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e0040.0195 8.3800e0030.0279 2.9500e0037.8300e0030.0108 0.0000 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e0030.0000 21.2119 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 56 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 799

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.5000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0815 0.0815 0.0000 0.0000 0.0823 Total 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.5000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0815 0.0815 0.0000 0.0000 0.0823 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 6.2700e0030.0000 6.2700e0033.0000e0030.0000 3.0000e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3100e0030.0146 7.0900e0032.0000e0056.2000e0046.2000e0045.7000e0045.7000e0040.0000 1.5115 1.5115 4.9000e0040.0000 1.5238 Total 1.3100e0030.0146 7.0900e0032.0000e0056.2700e0036.2000e0046.8900e0033.0000e0035.7000e0043.5700e0030.0000 1.5115 1.5115 4.9000e0040.0000 1.5238 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 58 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 801

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0142 0.0000 0.0142 6.8500e0030.0000 6.8500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.0800e0030.0340 0.0184 4.0000e0051.4800e0031.4800e0031.3700e0031.3700e0030.0000 3.6205 3.6205 1.1700e0030.0000 3.6498 Total 3.0800e0030.0340 0.0184 4.0000e0050.0142 1.4800e0030.0157 6.8500e0031.3700e0038.2200e0030.0000 3.6205 3.6205 1.1700e0030.0000 3.6498 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 59 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 802

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e0048.0000e0058.7000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.5000e0047.0000e0050.0000 7.0000e0050.0000 0.2038 0.2038 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2058 Total 1.0000e0048.0000e0058.7000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.5000e0047.0000e0050.0000 7.0000e0050.0000 0.2038 0.2038 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2058 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0142 0.0000 0.0142 6.8500e0030.0000 6.8500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.0800e0030.0340 0.0184 4.0000e0051.4800e0031.4800e0031.3700e0031.3700e0030.0000 3.6205 3.6205 1.1700e0030.0000 3.6498 Total 3.0800e0030.0340 0.0184 4.0000e0050.0142 1.4800e0030.0157 6.8500e0031.3700e0038.2200e0030.0000 3.6205 3.6205 1.1700e0030.0000 3.6498 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 60 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 803

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1523 1.1710 1.2611 2.2100e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0497 0.0497 0.0000 181.5991 181.5991 0.0308 0.0000 182.3701 Total 0.1523 1.1710 1.2611 2.2100e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0497 0.0497 0.0000 181.5991 181.5991 0.0308 0.0000 182.3701 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 61 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 804

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.4700e0030.0656 0.0151 2.3000e0046.4800e0033.4000e0046.8300e0031.8700e0033.3000e0042.2000e0030.0000 21.5666 21.5666 7.0000e0053.2300e00322.5314 Worker 0.0128 9.0200e0030.1081 2.9000e0040.0331 1.9000e0040.0332 8.7900e0031.7000e0048.9600e0030.0000 26.8413 26.8413 7.5000e0047.6000e00427.0863 Total 0.0142 0.0746 0.1232 5.2000e0040.0395 5.3000e0040.0401 0.0107 5.0000e0040.0112 0.0000 48.4079 48.4079 8.2000e0043.9900e00349.6177 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1523 1.1710 1.2611 2.2100e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0497 0.0497 0.0000 181.5989 181.5989 0.0308 0.0000 182.3698 Total 0.1523 1.1710 1.2611 2.2100e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0497 0.0497 0.0000 181.5989 181.5989 0.0308 0.0000 182.3698 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 62 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 805

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.2200e0030.0312 0.0440 7.0000e0051.5400e0031.5400e0031.4200e0031.4200e0030.0000 5.8862 5.8862 1.8700e0030.0000 5.9329 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.2200e0030.0312 0.0440 7.0000e0051.5400e0031.5400e0031.4200e0031.4200e0030.0000 5.8862 5.8862 1.8700e0030.0000 5.9329 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 63 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 806

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1000e0042.2000e0042.6000e0031.0000e0058.0000e0040.0000 8.0000e0042.1000e0040.0000 2.2000e0040.0000 0.6462 0.6462 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6521 Total 3.1000e0042.2000e0042.6000e0031.0000e0058.0000e0040.0000 8.0000e0042.1000e0040.0000 2.2000e0040.0000 0.6462 0.6462 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6521 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.2200e0030.0312 0.0440 7.0000e0051.5400e0031.5400e0031.4200e0031.4200e0030.0000 5.8862 5.8862 1.8700e0030.0000 5.9329 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.2200e0030.0312 0.0440 7.0000e0051.5400e0031.5400e0031.4200e0031.4200e0030.0000 5.8862 5.8862 1.8700e0030.0000 5.9329 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 64 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 807

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2000e0048.0000e0051.0000e0030.0000 3.1000e0040.0000 3.1000e0048.0000e0050.0000 8.0000e0050.0000 0.2485 0.2485 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2508 Total 1.2000e0048.0000e0051.0000e0030.0000 3.1000e0040.0000 3.1000e0048.0000e0050.0000 8.0000e0050.0000 0.2485 0.2485 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2508 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.2861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.6000e0046.5100e0039.0600e0031.0000e0053.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.2766 1.2766 8.0000e0050.0000 1.2785 Total 0.2870 6.5100e0039.0600e0031.0000e0053.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0043.5000e0040.0000 1.2766 1.2766 8.0000e0050.0000 1.2785 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 66 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 809

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 67 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 810
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2755 0.1111 0.1873 5.7000e0040.0448 9.3000e0040.0457 0.0130 6.8000e0040.0137 0.0000 52.6813 52.6813 9.9300e0035.1000e00354.4500 Unmitigated 0.2755 0.1111 0.1873 5.7000e0040.0448 9.3000e0040.0457 0.0130 6.8000e0040.0137 0.0000 52.6813 52.6813 9.9300e0035.1000e00354.4500

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Health Club 224.05 224.05 224.05 131,670 131,670
Recreational Swimming Pool 0.38 0.38 0.38 220 220
Total 224.43 224.43 224.43 131,890 131,890
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Health Club 2.60 2.60 2.60 16.90 64.10 19.00 52 39 9
Recreational Swimming Pool 2.60 2.60 2.60 33.00 48.00 19.00 52 39 9

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Health Club 0.432255 0.063343 0.225240 0.158296 0.047221 0.009429 0.011320 0.004341 0.000681 0.000465 0.038076 0.001344 0.007989 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.432255 0.063343 0.225240 0.158296 0.047221 0.009429 0.011320 0.004341 0.000681 0.000465 0.038076 0.001344 0.007989

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 68 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 811
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 63.2907 63.2907 3.0700e0033.5000e00463.4731 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 63.2907 63.2907 3.0700e0033.5000e00463.4731 NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.1600e0030.0105 8.8400e0036.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 11.4622 11.4622 2.2000e0042.1000e00411.5303 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.1600e0030.0105 8.8400e0036.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 11.4622 11.4622 2.2000e0042.1000e00411.5303

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 69 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 812

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Health Club 214793 1.1600e0030.0105 8.8400e0036.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 11.4622 11.4622 2.2000e0042.1000e00411.5303 Recreational
Swimming Pool
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1600e0030.0105 8.8400e0036.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 11.4622 11.4622 2.2000e0042.1000e00411.5303 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Health Club 214793 1.1600e0030.0105 8.8400e0036.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 11.4622 11.4622 2.2000e0042.1000e00411.5303 Recreational
Swimming Pool
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1600e0030.0105 8.8400e0036.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 11.4622 11.4622 2.2000e0042.1000e00411.5303 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 70 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 813

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Health Club 260467 63.2907 3.0700e0033.5000e00463.4731 Recreational
Swimming Pool
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 63.2907 3.0700e0033.5000e00463.4731
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Health Club 260467 63.2907 3.0700e0033.5000e00463.4731 Recreational
Swimming Pool
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 63.2907 3.0700e0033.5000e00463.4731
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 71 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 814

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3126 1.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1500e0031.1500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.2200e003 Unmitigated 0.3126 1.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1500e0031.1500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.2200e003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0715 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.2411 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.0000e0051.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1500e0031.1500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.2200e003 Total 0.3126 1.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1500e0031.1500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.2200e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 72 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 815

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0715 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.2411 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.0000e0051.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1500e0031.1500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.2200e003 Total 0.3126 1.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1500e0031.1500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.2200e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 73 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 816
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 8.1787 0.1241 2.9600e00312.1637
Unmitigated 8.1787 0.1241 2.9600e00312.1637

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Health Club 3.65031 /

2.23729

7.8603 0.1193 2.8500e00311.6902
Recreational
Swimming Pool

0.147858 /

0.0906226

0.3184 4.8300e0031.2000e0040.4735
Total 8.1787 0.1241 2.9700e00312.1637
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 74 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 817

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Health Club 3.65031 /

2.23729

7.8603 0.1193 2.8500e00311.6902
Recreational
Swimming Pool

0.147858 /

0.0906226

0.3184 4.8300e0031.2000e0040.4735
Total 8.1787 0.1241 2.9700e00312.1637
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 74.3048 4.3913 0.0000 184.0871
Unmitigated 74.3048 4.3913 0.0000 184.0871
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 75 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 818

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Health Club 351.8 71.4122 4.2203 0.0000 176.9208
Recreational
Swimming Pool

14.25 2.8926 0.1710 0.0000 7.1664
Total 74.3048 4.3913 0.0000 184.0871
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Health Club 351.8 71.4122 4.2203 0.0000 176.9208
Recreational
Swimming Pool

14.25 2.8926 0.1710 0.0000 7.1664
Total 74.3048 4.3913 0.0000 184.0871
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 76 of 77 Date: 11/3/2021 2:12 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 819

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Health Club 61.72 1000sqft 1.42 61,722.00 0
Recreational Swimming Pool 2.50 1000sqft 0.06 2,500.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Rural
14 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.7 Precipitation Freq (Days) 70

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company User Defined
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
535.7 CH4 Intensity 0.026
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.003
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 821
Demolition -
Grading -
Architectural Coating - SMAQMD recommends using paint with new VOC contents for archetectural coating. For the modeling, Nonflat Coating's VOC limit of 100 g/l is assumed.

Vehicle Trips - Daily VMT data provided by the traffic study Vehicle Emission Factors - Using 2021 EMFAC EF
Vehicle Emission Factors - Using 2021 EMFAC EF
Vehicle Emission Factors - Using 2021 EMFAC EF
Consumer Products -
Area Coating -
Water And Wastewater -
Area Mitigation -
Fleet Mix -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0 0.026
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 0 535.7
tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0 0.003
tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.25
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.6220e-003 5.2630e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.76 0.18
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 0.20
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 39.17
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,023.57 1,534.53
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 822
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,625.74 1,404.88
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.39 0.02
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.25 0.22
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.98 41.71
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.29 3.07
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.06 2.99
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.6820e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.4360e-003 5.6530e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.5850e-003 8.9570e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.2000e-005 3.0400e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9100e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.41 2.84
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.05 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.8000e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.6700e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.2000e-005 3.0400e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 823
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9100e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.47 3.36
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.8000e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.26
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.6320e-003 5.2700e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.66 0.18
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.44 0.20
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 38.40
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,017.67 1,519.17
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,625.75 1,404.88
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.38 0.02
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.25 0.22
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.81 40.59
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.13 2.94
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.06 2.99
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.8660e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.6560e-003 4.8810e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.5850e-003 8.9570e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 824
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.4000e-005 4.0700e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.4300e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 2.98
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.4000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.05 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.7500e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.6140e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.4000e-005 4.0700e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.4300e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.49 3.51
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.4000e-005 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.7500e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.6140e-003 5.2580e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.91 0.18
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 0.20
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 40.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,031.73 1,555.74
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,625.73 1,404.88
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.39 0.02
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 825
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.25 0.22
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.22 43.24
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.34 3.10
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.06 2.99
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.8090e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 6.5140e-003 6.7180e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.5850e-003 8.9570e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0000e-006 2.8940e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9200e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.38 2.65
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.05 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.1500e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.7470e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0000e-006 2.8940e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9200e-004 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.44 3.14
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.0000e-006 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 826
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.1500e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0000e-006 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.0210e-003 2.6200e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.00 0.82
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.60 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.27 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDA 247.75 244.91
tblVehicleEF LDA 51.41 52.50
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.4630e-003 6.0800e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.18 0.28
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 8.0800e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.4900e-003 1.4340e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7910e-003 2.1330e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.3730e-003 1.7560e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.6470e-003 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 1.60
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 7.7970e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.22 0.37
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.4010e-003 2.4220e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.9800e-004 5.2000e-004
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 1.60
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.12
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 827
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.24 0.41
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.3190e-003 2.8440e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.00 1.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.72 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.74 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDA 269.38 244.17
tblVehicleEF LDA 50.39 51.42
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.1150e-003 5.5460e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.16 0.24
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 8.0800e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.4900e-003 1.4340e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7910e-003 2.1330e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.3730e-003 1.7560e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.6470e-003 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.12 2.26
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.11 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 8.7420e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.17 0.29
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.6110e-003 2.4150e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.8900e-004 5.0900e-004
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.12 2.26
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 828
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.11 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.19 0.32
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.9200e-003 2.5250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.06 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.00 0.76
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.58 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.67 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDA 242.38 244.18
tblVehicleEF LDA 52.15 53.25
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.6770e-003 6.4250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.19 0.30
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 8.0800e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.4900e-003 1.4340e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7910e-003 2.1330e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.3730e-003 1.7560e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.6470e-003 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 1.43
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 8.8240e-003 1.4510e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 7.5100e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.25 0.42
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.3490e-003 2.4150e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 5.0600e-004 5.2700e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 829
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 1.43
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDA 8.8240e-003 1.4510e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.27 0.46
tblVehicleEF LDT1 5.3240e-003 8.1190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.15
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.00 1.87
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.18 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.66 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT1 306.97 310.60
tblVehicleEF LDT1 66.37 68.35
tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.7090e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.17
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.31 0.54
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.9650e-003 2.2410e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.6990e-003 3.8680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.8090e-003 2.2650e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.4820e-003 2.7540e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.15 4.11
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.27 0.31
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.48 0.87
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.9760e-003 3.0740e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 830
tblVehicleEF LDT1 6.4300e-004 6.7600e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.15 4.11
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.27 0.31
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.52 0.95
tblVehicleEF LDT1 6.0510e-003 8.7930e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.07 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.00 2.47
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.39 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT1 329.22 309.77
tblVehicleEF LDT1 65.00 66.90
tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.0170e-003 9.4050e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.14
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.28 0.48
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.9650e-003 2.2410e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.6990e-003 3.8680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.8090e-003 2.2650e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.4820e-003 2.7540e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.46 5.93
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.34 0.32
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.22 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.37 0.68
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 831
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.1920e-003 3.0650e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 6.3000e-004 6.6200e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.46 5.93
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.34 0.32
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.22 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.41 0.75
tblVehicleEF LDT1 5.0800e-003 7.8400e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.17
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.00 1.74
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.15 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.13 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT1 301.43 309.85
tblVehicleEF LDT1 67.36 69.33
tblVehicleEF LDT1 8.1300e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.11 0.19
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.34 0.59
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.9650e-003 2.2410e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.6990e-003 3.8680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.8090e-003 2.2650e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.4820e-003 2.7540e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 3.60
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.28 0.33
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 3.9370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.17 0.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 832
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.54 0.99
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.9220e-003 3.0660e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 6.5300e-004 6.8600e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 3.60
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.28 0.33
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 3.9370e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.17 0.20
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.60 1.09
tblVehicleEF LDT2 4.1340e-003 3.1630e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.00 0.97
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.97 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.15 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT2 332.07 345.49
tblVehicleEF LDT2 72.07 76.14
tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.3900e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.35 0.41
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 9.7250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.5570e-003 1.4450e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.9590e-003 2.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.4330e-003 1.7190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8010e-003 1.9390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 1.73
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.18 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 833
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.42 0.49
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.2190e-003 3.4180e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.9900e-004 7.5300e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 1.73
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.18 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.46 0.53
tblVehicleEF LDT2 4.6930e-003 3.4320e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.00 1.28
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.14 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.41 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT2 353.44 344.68
tblVehicleEF LDT2 70.57 74.53
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.7620e-003 9.5910e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.31 0.36
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 9.7250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.5570e-003 1.4450e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.9590e-003 2.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.4330e-003 1.7190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8010e-003 1.9390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.27 2.35
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.21 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.15 0.06
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 834
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.33 0.38
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.4260e-003 3.4100e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.8400e-004 7.3800e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.27 2.35
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.21 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.15 0.06
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.36 0.42
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.9400e-003 3.0480e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.00 0.90
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.94 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.70 0.00
tblVehicleEF LDT2 326.74 344.73
tblVehicleEF LDT2 73.15 77.25
tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.7750e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.38 0.45
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 9.7250e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.5570e-003 1.4450e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.9590e-003 2.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.4330e-003 1.7190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8010e-003 1.9390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 1.57
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 835
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 3.0500e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.48 0.55
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.1670e-003 3.4100e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.0900e-004 7.6400e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 1.57
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.24
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 3.0500e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.53 0.60
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.8970e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 1.34
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.42 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.01 2.18
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.69 9.48
tblVehicleEF LHD1 762.97 799.85
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.19 11.50
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0100e-003 8.6900e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 1.32
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.08 1.82
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.26 0.31
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1550e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 836
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6000e-004 2.2800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1050e-003 9.1200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5610e-003 2.4990e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3900e-004 3.4700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3960e-003 1.83
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.09 0.13
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.26
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-004 6.7800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.37 0.59
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-005 9.2000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.4080e-003 7.7890e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.1000e-005 1.1400e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3960e-003 1.83
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.09 0.13
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-004 6.7800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.19 0.23
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.37 0.59
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.9130e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 1.38
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.46 0.09
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 837
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.90 2.18
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.69 9.48
tblVehicleEF LHD1 763.03 800.00
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.00 11.12
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0130e-003 8.7200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 1.32
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.96 1.72
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.24 0.29
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1550e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6000e-004 2.2800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1050e-003 9.1200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5610e-003 2.4990e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3900e-004 3.4700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.0290e-003 2.50
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.11 0.13
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.26
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.2240e-003 1.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.36 0.55
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-005 9.2000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.4090e-003 7.7900e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.9000e-005 1.1000e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 838
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.0290e-003 2.50
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.11 0.13
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.2240e-003 1.2230e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.20 0.23
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.36 0.55
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.8870e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 1.32
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.40 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.08 2.18
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.69 9.48
tblVehicleEF LHD1 762.92 799.74
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.32 11.70
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0080e-003 8.6700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 1.32
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.10 1.84
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.28 0.33
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1550e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6000e-004 2.2800e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.1050e-003 9.1200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5610e-003 2.4990e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 839
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.3900e-004 3.4700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.1000e-004 1.64
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.26
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.1700e-004 8.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.41 0.65
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.3000e-005 9.2000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.4080e-003 7.7880e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.2000e-005 1.1600e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.1000e-004 1.64
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.1700e-004 8.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.19 0.22
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.41 0.65
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.09 0.11
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.8220e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.2350e-003 9.0000e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.7120e-003 5.1890e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.63
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.86 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.34 1.34
tblVehicleEF LHD2 16.04 15.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 721.68 769.54
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.06 6.64
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.2840e-003 2.0090e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 840
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.6360e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 1.89
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.86 1.54
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.10
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7450e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.0000e-005 4.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.6690e-003 1.4780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.8250e-003 2.7500e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.4000e-005 1.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.4400e-004 0.42
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.16
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.3400e-004 2.6200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.18
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5200e-004 1.4500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.9100e-003 7.4040e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.0000e-005 6.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.4400e-004 0.42
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.3400e-004 2.6200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.18 0.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 841
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.8280e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.2950e-003 9.0440e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.3730e-003 4.8250e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.64
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.86 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.30 1.34
tblVehicleEF LHD2 16.04 15.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 721.69 769.57
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.00 6.48
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.2850e-003 2.0110e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.2480e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 1.89
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.77 1.46
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7450e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.0000e-005 4.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.6690e-003 1.4780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.8250e-003 2.7500e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.4000e-005 1.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5620e-003 0.56
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.16
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 842
tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.4600e-004 4.5700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.18
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.14
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5200e-004 1.4500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.9100e-003 7.4040e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.0000e-005 6.4000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5620e-003 0.56
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.4600e-004 4.5700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.18 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.14
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.8180e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.1930e-003 8.9700e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.9400e-003 5.4330e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.63
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.85 0.15
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.36 1.34
tblVehicleEF LHD2 16.04 15.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 721.67 769.51
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.10 6.72
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.2830e-003 2.0080e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.9540e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 1.89
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.88 1.56
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 843
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7450e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.0000e-005 4.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.6690e-003 1.4780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.8250e-003 2.7500e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.4000e-005 1.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7500e-004 0.38
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.16
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.2000e-005 3.4000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.15 0.18
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.17
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.5200e-004 1.4500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.9100e-003 7.4040e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.1000e-005 6.7000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.7500e-004 0.38
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.2000e-005 3.4000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.18 0.20
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.17
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.36 0.22
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.28 0.24
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.00 17.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 844
tblVehicleEF MCY 21.89 8.4200e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 9.74 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 216.40 223.35
tblVehicleEF MCY 65.63 73.13
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.07 0.07
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.21 0.74
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.28 0.19
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0160e-003 1.9560e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.1380e-003 3.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.8900e-003 2.0980e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9630e-003 3.3090e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.16 5.50
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.95 0.81
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.54 0.19
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.54 1.53
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.03 0.83
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.24 1.88
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1410e-003 2.2100e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.4900e-004 7.2400e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.16 5.50
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.95 0.81
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.54 0.19
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.09 1.80
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.03 0.83
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.43 2.05
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.34 0.21
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.22 0.19
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 845
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.00 16.75
tblVehicleEF MCY 20.77 8.4200e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 8.10 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 214.12 217.02
tblVehicleEF MCY 61.31 65.04
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.06 0.07
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.02 0.62
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.25 0.17
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0160e-003 1.9560e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.1380e-003 3.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.8900e-003 2.0980e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9630e-003 3.3090e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.88 9.23
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.46 0.83
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.61 0.33
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.40 1.46
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.99 0.76
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.72 1.44
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1190e-003 2.1480e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.0700e-004 6.4400e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.88 9.23
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.46 0.83
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.61 0.33
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.92 1.72
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.99 0.76
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.87 1.57
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.37 0.22
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 846
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.33 0.28
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.00 18.05
tblVehicleEF MCY 23.58 8.4200e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 11.09 0.00
tblVehicleEF MCY 219.53 227.17
tblVehicleEF MCY 69.05 77.44
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.07 0.07
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.29 0.78
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.30 0.20
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0160e-003 1.9560e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.1380e-003 3.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.8900e-003 2.0980e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.9630e-003 3.3090e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.25 4.51
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.04 0.92
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.13 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.67 1.60
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.19 0.97
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.62 2.21
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1720e-003 2.2480e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.8300e-004 7.6600e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.25 4.51
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.04 0.92
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.13 0.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.24 1.88
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.19 0.97
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.85 2.40
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 847
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.3610e-003 4.3240e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.13
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.00 1.13
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.97 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 400.27 409.93
tblVehicleEF MDV 86.32 90.72
tblVehicleEF MDV 9.2270e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.12
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.39 0.55
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 9.8980e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6690e-003 1.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0180e-003 2.4250e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5420e-003 1.9070e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.8560e-003 2.1470e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 2.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.19 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.11
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.49 0.69
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.8780e-003 4.0510e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.3700e-004 8.9800e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 2.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.19 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.11
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 848
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.54 0.75
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.9620e-003 4.6910e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.00 1.50
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.14 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.68 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 422.16 409.07
tblVehicleEF MDV 84.61 88.79
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.5790e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.35 0.49
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 9.8980e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6690e-003 1.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0180e-003 2.4250e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5420e-003 1.9070e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.8560e-003 2.1470e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.29 3.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.17 0.06
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.39 0.54
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.0900e-003 4.0420e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.2000e-004 8.7900e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.29 3.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.17 0.06
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 849
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.43 0.59
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.1590e-003 4.1690e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.00 1.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.94 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.14 0.00
tblVehicleEF MDV 394.82 409.15
tblVehicleEF MDV 87.55 92.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 9.6230e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.13
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.43 0.60
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 9.8980e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6690e-003 1.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0180e-003 2.4250e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5420e-003 1.9070e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.8560e-003 2.1470e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 2.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.20 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 3.4740e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.56 0.78
tblVehicleEF MDV 3.8250e-003 4.0430e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 8.4900e-004 9.1100e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 2.05
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.20 0.25
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 3.4740e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 850
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.62 0.85
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.00 1.12
tblVehicleEF MH 1.32 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 2.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,556.51 1,571.75
tblVehicleEF MH 17.47 19.72
tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 2.17 2.05
tblVehicleEF MH 0.24 0.29
tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.04
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.2800e-004 2.5000e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 3.3390e-003 3.3180e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 2.9300e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 0.75 3.05
tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.22 0.17
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 1.7300e-004 1.9500e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 851
tblVehicleEF MH 0.75 3.05
tblVehicleEF MH 0.06 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.22 0.17
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.11
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.00 1.17
tblVehicleEF MH 1.38 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 1.78 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,556.60 1,572.02
tblVehicleEF MH 17.04 18.99
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 2.03 1.92
tblVehicleEF MH 0.22 0.27
tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.04
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.2800e-004 2.5000e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 3.3390e-003 3.3180e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 2.9300e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 2.19 4.24
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.49 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 852
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 1.6900e-004 1.8800e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 2.19 4.24
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.49 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.12
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.00 1.09
tblVehicleEF MH 1.29 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 2.20 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,556.44 1,571.55
tblVehicleEF MH 17.75 20.12
tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 2.21 2.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.26 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 0.13 0.04
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.2800e-004 2.5000e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 3.3390e-003 3.3180e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF MH 2.1000e-004 2.9300e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 0.24 2.73
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.09
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 853
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 1.7600e-004 1.9900e-004
tblVehicleEF MH 0.24 2.73
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.11
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MH 0.11 0.12
tblVehicleEF MHD 3.3600e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.1250e-003 2.5480e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.8450e-003 3.7150e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.58 0.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.27 0.20
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.16 8.14
tblVehicleEF MHD 139.17 142.79
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,082.52 1,113.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.62 11.86
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.15
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.2130e-003 7.9990e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.89 13.26
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.79 1.09
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.74 1.62
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.3100e-004 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.05
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 854
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.5570e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1700e-004 5.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.9900e-004 8.4100e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.1380e-003 8.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 1.4300e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.3100e-004 0.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.30
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.7600e-004 1.5400e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3170e-003 1.3520e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.5000e-005 1.1700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.3100e-004 0.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.37
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.7600e-004 1.5400e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 3.1990e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.1860e-003 2.6160e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.1930e-003 3.4390e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.51 0.26
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.28 0.20
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.03 7.55
tblVehicleEF MHD 139.17 143.24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 855
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,082.53 1,113.08
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.39 11.35
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.15
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.9090e-003 7.4930e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.88 12.96
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.70 1.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.73 1.61
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.2300e-004 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.5570e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1700e-004 5.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.9600e-004 7.1500e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.1380e-003 8.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 1.4300e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2790e-003 0.39
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.30
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.3400e-004 2.6700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3180e-003 1.3570e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.3000e-005 1.1200e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2790e-003 0.39
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.3400e-004 2.6700e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 856
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 3.5160e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.0810e-003 2.4990e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.2990e-003 3.9060e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.64 0.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.27 0.20
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.26 8.82
tblVehicleEF MHD 139.27 142.32
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,082.51 1,113.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.77 12.14
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.15 0.15
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.4780e-003 8.3090e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.91 13.67
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.81 1.11
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.74 1.62
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.8000e-004 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.5570e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1700e-004 5.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.4200e-004 1.0150e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 9.1380e-003 8.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0700e-004 1.4300e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2800e-004 0.22
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.30
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.8000e-005 2.0000e-005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 37 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 857
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3180e-003 1.3480e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 8.7000e-005 1.2000e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2800e-004 0.22
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.36
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.8000e-005 2.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.06 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.4360e-003 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.8750e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 9.6100e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.65 0.70
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.86 0.17
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.78 8.47
tblVehicleEF OBUS 101.76 183.31
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,372.58 1,475.89
tblVehicleEF OBUS 18.07 16.49
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.41 6.86
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.60 1.68
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.00 1.29
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.3800e-004 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 38 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 858
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.0190e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0400e-004 7.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.3200e-004 2.6200e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.6140e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8800e-004 1.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.5930e-003 0.89
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.63
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.4800e-004 3.6800e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.12 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.6700e-004 1.7370e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.7900e-004 1.6300e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.5930e-003 0.89
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.80
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.4800e-004 3.6800e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.13
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.06
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.5440e-003 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.1540e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 8.8650e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.65 0.72
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.90 0.17
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.43 8.31
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 39 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 859
tblVehicleEF OBUS 100.55 181.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,372.64 1,475.96
tblVehicleEF OBUS 17.48 15.82
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.39 6.59
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.51 1.60
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.98 1.28
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.2200e-004 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.0190e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0400e-004 7.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1700e-004 2.3200e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.6140e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8800e-004 1.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 4.4540e-003 1.34
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.65
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1940e-003 6.5300e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.11 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.5500e-004 1.7150e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.7300e-004 1.5700e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 4.4540e-003 1.34
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 40 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 860
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1940e-003 6.5300e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.13
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.12 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.3080e-003 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.6770e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.66 0.69
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.84 0.17
tblVehicleEF OBUS 3.01 8.69
tblVehicleEF OBUS 103.44 186.48
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,372.54 1,475.84
tblVehicleEF OBUS 18.46 16.86
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.14 0.16
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.44 7.24
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.62 1.70
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.01 1.30
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.5900e-004 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.0190e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.0400e-004 7.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.5200e-004 3.0200e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.6140e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8800e-004 1.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.6800e-004 0.81
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.60
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 41 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 861
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.2000e-004 5.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.13 0.06
tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.8300e-004 1.7670e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8300e-004 1.6700e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.6800e-004 0.81
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.76
tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.2000e-004 5.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.13
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.08 0.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.14 0.06
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.42
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 9.4050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.4210e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.31 0.98
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.85 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.63 17.91
tblVehicleEF SBUS 329.50 320.63
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,098.41 1,108.97
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.45 1.16
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.16
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.8320e-003 1.1770e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.86 20.97
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.11 4.61
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.76 0.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 42 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 862
tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0480e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.5000e-005 1.7400e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.8290e-003 5.3920e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.8640e-003 2.9050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.2000e-005 1.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.6000e-004 0.83
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.7890e-003 7.3000e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 2.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.4600e-004 1.7000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.1250e-003 3.0350e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.4000e-005 1.1000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.6000e-004 0.83
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.7890e-003 7.3000e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.18 2.88
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.4600e-004 1.7000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.15 0.11
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 1.8370e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.13
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.42
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 9.6850e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6630e-003 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 43 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 863
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.27 1.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.87 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.40 17.68
tblVehicleEF SBUS 339.85 331.74
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,098.45 1,108.98
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.07 1.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.16
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.7190e-003 1.1050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.96 21.39
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.74 4.36
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.76 0.47
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.2620e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.5000e-005 1.7400e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.0780e-003 4.5510e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.8640e-003 2.9050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.2000e-005 1.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9390e-003 1.46
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 7.3600e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 2.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.0100e-004 2.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 1.5350e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.2230e-003 3.1400e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 44 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 864
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.0000e-005 1.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9390e-003 1.46
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 7.3600e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.18 2.88
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.0100e-004 2.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.15 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 1.5350e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.10
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.42
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.9210e-003 9.2250e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.8640e-003 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.37 0.96
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.83 0.12
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.77 18.22
tblVehicleEF SBUS 315.21 305.28
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,098.38 1,108.97
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.68 1.24
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.16
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.9210e-003 1.2290e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.73 20.39
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.19 4.66
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.76 0.49
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.1330e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.74 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.5000e-005 1.7400e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 45 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 865
tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.8680e-003 6.5530e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.8640e-003 2.9050e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.2000e-005 1.3000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9000e-004 0.69
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.9230e-003 7.3600e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 2.00
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.0200e-004 3.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 2.4220e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.13
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9900e-003 2.8900e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.7000e-005 1.2000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.9000e-004 0.69
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.9230e-003 7.3600e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.18 2.88
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.0200e-004 3.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.15 0.11
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 2.4220e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.83 2.9490e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.00 0.12
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.45 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,562.30 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 30.90 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.15 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 46 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 866
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.43 0.29
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.29 0.27
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0130e-003 4.5220e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1700e-004 2.7200e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.0200e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.8030e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9200e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1700e-003 0.13
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.1700e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0160e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.16 0.17
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0600e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1700e-003 0.13
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.1700e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.86 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0160e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.17 0.18
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.83 3.0010e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.00 0.13
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.45 0.14
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 47 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 867
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.28 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,562.31 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 29.67 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.14 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.41 0.28
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.26 0.25
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0130e-003 4.5220e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1700e-004 2.7200e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.0200e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.8030e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9200e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.5480e-003 0.25
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.3380e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.8260e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9400e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.5480e-003 0.25
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.3380e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.86 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.8260e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.15 0.16
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 48 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 868
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.83 2.9140e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.00 0.12
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.45 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.52 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,562.29 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 31.76 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.15 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.43 0.29
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.30 0.29
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.0130e-003 4.5220e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1700e-004 2.7200e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 5.0200e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.8030e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.9200e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.7300e-004 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8800e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.7740e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.17 0.19
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.1400e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.7300e-004 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 49 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 869

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8800e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.86 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.7740e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.19 0.20
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 6.60 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 6.60 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.60 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.60 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 14.70 2.60
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 14.70 2.60
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 20.87 3.63
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.10 0.15
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 26.73 3.63
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 13.60 0.15
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 32.93 3.63
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 28.82 0.15
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 50 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 870

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.8090 18.8195 14.9162 0.0322 7.2103 0.8555 7.9533 3.4586 0.7996 4.1422 0.0000 3,173.280 5 3,173.280
5 0.6486 0.1126 3,221.790
3 2023 57.4335 12.4209 13.9661 0.0274 0.4120 0.5198 0.9318 0.1108 0.5018 0.6126 0.0000 2,557.697 0 2,557.697
0 0.4152 0.0433 2,579.304
0 Maximum 57.4335 18.8195 14.9162 0.0322 7.2103 0.8555 7.9533 3.4586 0.7996 4.1422 0.0000 3,173.280 5 3,173.280
5 0.6486 0.1126 3,221.790
3 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.8090 18.8195 14.9162 0.0322 7.2103 0.8555 7.9533 3.4586 0.7996 4.1422 0.0000 3,173.280 5 3,173.280
5 0.6486 0.1126 3,221.790
3 2023 57.4335 12.4209 13.9661 0.0274 0.4120 0.5198 0.9318 0.1108 0.5018 0.6126 0.0000 2,557.697 0 2,557.697
0 0.4152 0.0433 2,579.304
0 Maximum 57.4335 18.8195 14.9162 0.0322 7.2103 0.8555 7.9533 3.4586 0.7996 4.1422 0.0000 3,173.280 5 3,173.280
5 0.6486 0.1126 3,221.790
3 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 51 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 871
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 52 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 872

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.7134 6.0000e0056.5500e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0141 0.0141 4.0000e0050.0150 Energy 6.3500e0030.0577 0.0485 3.5000e0044.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e00369.2321 69.2321 1.3300e0031.2700e00369.6435 Mobile 1.8865 0.5685 1.1648 3.1300e0030.2575 5.1000e0030.2626 0.0745 3.7500e0030.0782 317.9153 317.9153 0.0510 0.0291 327.8731 Total 3.6062 0.6262 1.2198 3.4800e0030.2575 9.5000e0030.2670 0.0745 8.1500e0030.0826 387.1615 387.1615 0.0524 0.0304 397.5316 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.7134 6.0000e0056.5500e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0141 0.0141 4.0000e0050.0150 Energy 6.3500e0030.0577 0.0485 3.5000e0044.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e00369.2321 69.2321 1.3300e0031.2700e00369.6435 Mobile 1.8865 0.5685 1.1648 3.1300e0030.2575 5.1000e0030.2626 0.0745 3.7500e0030.0782 317.9153 317.9153 0.0510 0.0291 327.8731 Total 3.6062 0.6262 1.2198 3.4800e0030.2575 9.5000e0030.2670 0.0745 8.1500e0030.0826 387.1615 387.1615 0.0524 0.0304 397.5316 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 53 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 873

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2022 1/28/2022 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/29/2022 2/1/2022 5 2 3 Grading Grading 2/2/2022 2/7/2022 5 4
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/1/2023 10/6/2023 5 200 5 Paving Paving 10/7/2023 10/20/2023 5 10
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/21/2023 11/3/2023 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 92,583; Non-Residential Outdoor: 30,861; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 54 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 874

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 177.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 27.00 11.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 55 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 875

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.9495 0.0000 1.9495 0.2952 0.0000 0.2952 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 1.9495 0.8379 2.7874 0.2952 0.7829 1.0781 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0490 2.1547 0.3228 6.5500e0030.1535 0.0166 0.1701 0.0420 0.0159 0.0579 692.7822 692.7822 2.3700e0030.1086 725.1893 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0710 0.0431 0.6329 1.5400e0030.1661 9.5000e0040.1670 0.0440 8.8000e0040.0449 157.0815 157.0815 4.2300e0034.0100e003158.3819 Total 0.1200 2.1978 0.9557 8.0900e0030.3196 0.0176 0.3371 0.0860 0.0168 0.1028 849.8637 849.8637 6.6000e0030.1126 883.5712 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 56 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 876

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.9495 0.0000 1.9495 0.2952 0.0000 0.2952 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 1.9495 0.8379 2.7874 0.2952 0.7829 1.0781 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0490 2.1547 0.3228 6.5500e0030.1535 0.0166 0.1701 0.0420 0.0159 0.0579 692.7822 692.7822 2.3700e0030.1086 725.1893 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0710 0.0431 0.6329 1.5400e0030.1661 9.5000e0040.1670 0.0440 8.8000e0040.0449 157.0815 157.0815 4.2300e0034.0100e003158.3819 Total 0.1200 2.1978 0.9557 8.0900e0030.3196 0.0176 0.3371 0.0860 0.0168 0.1028 849.8637 849.8637 6.6000e0030.1126 883.5712 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 57 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 877

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.2662 0.0000 6.2662 3.0041 0.0000 3.0041 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0172 0.6225 0.6225 0.5727 0.5727 1,666.173 8 1,666.173
8 0.5389 1,679.645
7 Total 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0172 6.2662 0.6225 6.8887 3.0041 0.5727 3.5768 1,666.173 8 1,666.173
8 0.5389 1,679.645
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0437 0.0265 0.3895 9.5000e0040.1022 5.8000e0040.1028 0.0271 5.4000e0040.0276 96.6655 96.6655 2.6000e0032.4700e00397.4658 Total 0.0437 0.0265 0.3895 9.5000e0040.1022 5.8000e0040.1028 0.0271 5.4000e0040.0276 96.6655 96.6655 2.6000e0032.4700e00397.4658 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 58 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 878

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.2662 0.0000 6.2662 3.0041 0.0000 3.0041 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0172 0.6225 0.6225 0.5727 0.5727 0.0000 1,666.173 8 1,666.173
8 0.5389 1,679.645
7 Total 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0172 6.2662 0.6225 6.8887 3.0041 0.5727 3.5768 0.0000 1,666.173 8 1,666.173
8 0.5389 1,679.645
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0437 0.0265 0.3895 9.5000e0040.1022 5.8000e0040.1028 0.0271 5.4000e0040.0276 96.6655 96.6655 2.6000e0032.4700e00397.4658 Total 0.0437 0.0265 0.3895 9.5000e0040.1022 5.8000e0040.1028 0.0271 5.4000e0040.0276 96.6655 96.6655 2.6000e0032.4700e00397.4658 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 59 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 879

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0546 0.0331 0.4868 1.1900e0030.1277 7.3000e0040.1285 0.0339 6.7000e0040.0346 120.8319 120.8319 3.2500e0033.0800e003121.8323 Total 0.0546 0.0331 0.4868 1.1900e0030.1277 7.3000e0040.1285 0.0339 6.7000e0040.0346 120.8319 120.8319 3.2500e0033.0800e003121.8323 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 60 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 880

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0546 0.0331 0.4868 1.1900e0030.1277 7.3000e0040.1285 0.0339 6.7000e0040.0346 120.8319 120.8319 3.2500e0033.0800e003121.8323 Total 0.0546 0.0331 0.4868 1.1900e0030.1277 7.3000e0040.1285 0.0339 6.7000e0040.0346 120.8319 120.8319 3.2500e0033.0800e003121.8323 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 61 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 881

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Total 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0150 0.6313 0.1481 2.2500e0030.0671 3.4300e0030.0706 0.0193 3.2800e0030.0226 237.6689 237.6689 8.0000e0040.0356 248.2925 Worker 0.1382 0.0792 1.2069 3.1100e0030.3449 1.8600e0030.3467 0.0915 1.7100e0030.0932 318.2404 318.2404 7.8900e0037.6800e003320.7258 Total 0.1532 0.7105 1.3550 5.3600e0030.4120 5.2900e0030.4173 0.1108 4.9900e0030.1158 555.9093 555.9093 8.6900e0030.0433 569.0183 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 62 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 882

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 0.0000 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Total 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 0.0000 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0150 0.6313 0.1481 2.2500e0030.0671 3.4300e0030.0706 0.0193 3.2800e0030.0226 237.6689 237.6689 8.0000e0040.0356 248.2925 Worker 0.1382 0.0792 1.2069 3.1100e0030.3449 1.8600e0030.3467 0.0915 1.7100e0030.0932 318.2404 318.2404 7.8900e0037.6800e003320.7258 Total 0.1532 0.7105 1.3550 5.3600e0030.4120 5.2900e0030.4173 0.1108 4.9900e0030.1158 555.9093 555.9093 8.6900e0030.0433 569.0183 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 63 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 883

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 0.0136 0.3084 0.3084 0.2846 0.2846 1,297.688 0 1,297.688
0 0.4114 1,307.972
5 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 0.0136 0.3084 0.3084 0.2846 0.2846 1,297.688 0 1,297.688
0 0.4114 1,307.972
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0665 0.0381 0.5811 1.5000e0030.1661 9.0000e0040.1669 0.0440 8.2000e0040.0449 153.2269 153.2269 3.8000e0033.7000e003154.4235 Total 0.0665 0.0381 0.5811 1.5000e0030.1661 9.0000e0040.1669 0.0440 8.2000e0040.0449 153.2269 153.2269 3.8000e0033.7000e003154.4235 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 64 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 884

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 0.0136 0.3084 0.3084 0.2846 0.2846 0.0000 1,297.688 0 1,297.688
0 0.4114 1,307.972
5 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 0.0136 0.3084 0.3084 0.2846 0.2846 0.0000 1,297.688 0 1,297.688
0 0.4114 1,307.972
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0665 0.0381 0.5811 1.5000e0030.1661 9.0000e0040.1669 0.0440 8.2000e0040.0449 153.2269 153.2269 3.8000e0033.7000e003154.4235 Total 0.0665 0.0381 0.5811 1.5000e0030.1661 9.0000e0040.1669 0.0440 8.2000e0040.0449 153.2269 153.2269 3.8000e0033.7000e003154.4235 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 65 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 885

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 57.2163 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 57.4080 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0256 0.0147 0.2235 5.8000e0040.0639 3.4000e0040.0642 0.0169 3.2000e0040.0173 58.9334 58.9334 1.4600e0031.4200e00359.3937 Total 0.0256 0.0147 0.2235 5.8000e0040.0639 3.4000e0040.0642 0.0169 3.2000e0040.0173 58.9334 58.9334 1.4600e0031.4200e00359.3937 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 66 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 886

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 57.2163 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 57.4080 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0256 0.0147 0.2235 5.8000e0040.0639 3.4000e0040.0642 0.0169 3.2000e0040.0173 58.9334 58.9334 1.4600e0031.4200e00359.3937 Total 0.0256 0.0147 0.2235 5.8000e0040.0639 3.4000e0040.0642 0.0169 3.2000e0040.0173 58.9334 58.9334 1.4600e0031.4200e00359.3937 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 67 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 887

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.8865 0.5685 1.1648 3.1300e0030.2575 5.1000e0030.2626 0.0745 3.7500e0030.0782 317.9153 317.9153 0.0510 0.0291 327.8731 Unmitigated 1.8865 0.5685 1.1648 3.1300e0030.2575 5.1000e0030.2626 0.0745 3.7500e0030.0782 317.9153 317.9153 0.0510 0.0291 327.8731

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 68 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 888
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Health Club 0.432255 0.063343 0.225240 0.158296 0.047221 0.009429 0.011320 0.004341 0.000681 0.000465 0.038076 0.001344 0.007989 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.432255 0.063343 0.225240 0.158296 0.047221 0.009429 0.011320 0.004341 0.000681 0.000465 0.038076 0.001344 0.007989

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

6.3500e0030.0577 0.0485 3.5000e0044.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e00369.2321 69.2321 1.3300e0031.2700e00369.6435 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

6.3500e0030.0577 0.0485 3.5000e0044.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e00369.2321 69.2321 1.3300e0031.2700e00369.6435

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 69 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 889

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Health Club 588.473 6.3500e0030.0577 0.0485 3.5000e0044.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e00369.2321 69.2321 1.3300e0031.2700e00369.6435 Recreational
Swimming Pool
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3500e0030.0577 0.0485 3.5000e0044.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e00369.2321 69.2321 1.3300e0031.2700e00369.6435 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Health Club 0.588473 6.3500e0030.0577 0.0485 3.5000e0044.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e00369.2321 69.2321 1.3300e0031.2700e00369.6435 Recreational
Swimming Pool
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3500e0030.0577 0.0485 3.5000e0044.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e0034.3800e00369.2321 69.2321 1.3300e0031.2700e00369.6435 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 70 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 890

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.7134 6.0000e0056.5500e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0141 0.0141 4.0000e0050.0150 Unmitigated 1.7134 6.0000e0056.5500e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0141 0.0141 4.0000e0050.0150

0.3919 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3209 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.0000e0046.0000e0056.5500e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0141 0.0141 4.0000e0050.0150 Total 1.7133 6.0000e0056.5500e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0141 0.0141 4.0000e0050.0150 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 71 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 891

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.3919 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3209 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.0000e0046.0000e0056.5500e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0141 0.0141 4.0000e0050.0150 Total 1.7133 6.0000e0056.5500e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0141 0.0141 4.0000e0050.0150 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 72 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 892

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 73 of 73 Date: 11/3/2021 2:09 PM 56 Acre Master Plan - Multigenerational Center - El Dorado-Lake Tahoe County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 893
Energy Calculations Summary
Construction Fuel Usage Summary
Diesel Gasoline Diesel Diesel
Construction
Year
Off‐road
Equipment
(gallons)
On‐road
(gallons)
On‐road
(gallons) Combined
2022 18,616 31,908 96 18,712
2023 18,108 33,829 95 18,203
2024 16,033 26,679 94 16,127
2025 54 201 0 54
Total Gasoline 92,616 gallons
Total Diesel 53,096 gallons
894
2025 Construction Offroad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad
Equipment Type
Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Number of
days
Average Daily Factor
Diesel Fuel Usage
Year Start Date End Date Network Days
Site Preparation Rubber Tired
Dozers
3 8.00 247 0.40 7 0.6 498 Site Preparation 2025 1/1/2025 1/9/2025 7 Site Preparation Tractors/Loa
ders/Backhoes
4 8.00 97 0.37 7 0.6 241 Grading 2025 1/10/2025 1/29/2025 14 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 14 0.6 403 Building Construction 2025 1/30/2025 12/31/2025 240Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 14 0.6 258 Building Construction 2026 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 261Grading Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00 247 0.40 14 0.6 332 Building Construction 2027 1/1/2027 10/6/2027 199 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 14 0.6 1,184 Paving 2027 10/7/2027 11/24/2027 35Grading Tractors/Loa ders/Backhoes
2 8.00 97 0.37 14 0.6 241 Architectural Coating 2027 11/25/2027 12/31/2027 27 Building Construction
Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 240 0.6 3,376 Architectural Coating 2028 1/1/2028 1/12/2028 8 Building Construction
Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 240 0.6 3,076
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00 84 0.74 240 0.6 3,580
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00 97 0.37 240 0.6 5,427
TOTAL 18,616
2026 Construction Offroad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad
Equipment Type
Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Number of
days
Average Daily Factor
Diesel Fuel Usage
Building Construction
Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 261 0.6 3,672
Building Construction
Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 261 0.6 3,345
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00 84 0.74 261 0.6 3,894
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00 97 0.37 261 0.6 5,901
Building Construction
Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 261 0.6 1,297
TOTAL 18,108
2027 Construction Offroad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad
Equipment
Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Number of
days
Average Daily Factor
Diesel Fuel Usage Building
Construction
Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 199 0.6 2,800
Building Construction
Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 199 0.6 2,550
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00 84 0.74 199 0.6 2,969
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00 97 0.37 199 0.6 4,500
Building Construction
Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 199 0.6 989
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 35 0.6 917 Paving Paving
Equipment
2 8.00 132 0.36 35 0.6 798
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 35 0.6 511 Architectural Coating Air Compressors
1 6.00 78 0.48 27 0.6 182
TOTAL 16,033
895
2028 Construction Offroad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad
Equipment Type
Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Number of
days
Average Daily Factor
Diesel Fuel Usage
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00 78 0.48 8 0.6 54
TOTAL 54
Trips and VMT2025
Phase Name Daily Worker
Trip
Days per Year
Total Worker Trips
Total Vendor Trips
Total Hauling Trips
Worker Trip Length (miles)
Vendor Trip Length (miles)
Haul Trip Length (miles)
Total Worker Trip Length (miles)
Total Vendor Trip Length (miles)
Total Haul Trip Length (miles)
Total gallons of gasoline Total
gallons of diesel
Site Preparation 18.00 7 126 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 2116.8 0 0 74 0Grading 20.00 14 280 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 4704 0 0 164 0Building Construction 225.00 240 54000 89.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 907200 587.4 0 31,670 96 TOTAL 31,908 96
2026
Phase Name Daily Worker
Trip
Days per Year
Total Worker Trips
Total Vendor Trips
Total Hauling Trips
Worker Trip Length (miles)
Vendor Trip Length (miles)
Haul Trip Length (miles)
Total Worker Trip Length (miles)
Total Vendor Trip Length (miles)
Total Haul Trip Length (miles)
Total gallons of gasoline Total
gallons of diesel
Building Construction
225.00 261 58725 89.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 986580 587.4 0 33,829 95 TOTAL 33,829 95
2027
Phase Name Daily Worker
Trip
Days per Year
Total Worker Trips
Total Vendor Trips
Total Hauling Trips
Worker Trip Length (miles)
Vendor Trip Length (miles)
Haul Trip Length (miles)
Total Worker Trip Length (miles)
Total Vendor Trip Length (miles)
Total Haul Trip Length (miles)
Total gallons of gasoline Total
gallons of diesel
Building Construction
225.00 199 44775 89.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 752220 587.4 0 25,681 94 Paving 15.00 35 525 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 8820 0 0 301 0Architectural Coating

45.00 27 1215 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 20412 0 0 697 0 TOTAL 26,679 94
2028
Phase Name Daily Worker
Trip
Days per Year
Total Worker Trips
Total Vendor Trips
Total Hauling Trips
Worker Trip Length (miles)
Vendor Trip Length (miles)
Haul Trip Length (miles)
Total Worker Trip Length (miles)
Total Vendor Trip Length (miles)
Total Haul Trip Length (miles)
Total gallons of gasoline Total
gallons of diesel
Architectural Coating

45.00 8 360 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 6048 0 0 201 0
TOTAL 201 0
Notes: Consistent with CalEEMod, worker vehicles assumed to be gasoline and 50% LDA, 25% LDT1, and 25% LDT2. Vendor and haul trips are assumed to be 100% diesel Heavy-Duty Trucks (T7). 896
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub‐Area
Region: El Dorado (LT)Calendar Year: 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028 Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel gas Diesel gas miles/hr vehicles miles/day trips/day 1,000 gallons/day 1,000 gallons/day El Dorado (LT) 2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4216.7520 161650.2858 19194.6282 5.0430 0.0000 32.05 El Dorado (LT) 2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1196.3822 35690.2445 4956.6792 1.3800 0.0000 25.86 El Dorado (LT) 2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5112.1143 186533.7896 22782.9707 7.5793 0.0000 24.61 El Dorado (LT) 2025 T7 Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3.9205 291.3426 56.9646 0.0000 0.047419571 6.14 Notes: Consistent with CalEEMod, worker vehicles assumed to be gasoline and 50% LDA, 25% LDT1, and 25% LDT2. Vendor and haul trips are assumed to be 100% diesel Heavy-Duty Trucks (T7).

28.65 6.14
Miles per
gallon
Gasoline miles per
gallon
Diesel miles per
gallon
897
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub‐Area
Region: El Dorado (LT)Calendar Year: 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028 Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel gas Diesel gas miles/hr vehicles miles/day trips/day 1,000 gallons/day 1,000 gallons/day El Dorado (LT) 2026 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4358.668013 169630.3293 19921.95412 5.176629672 0.0000 32.77 El Dorado (LT) 2026 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1139.937878 33734.53975 4700.330358 1.290976986 0.0000 26.13 El Dorado (LT) 2026 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5060.295694 183391.0296 22461.11935 7.338989973 0.0000 24.99 El Dorado (LT) 2026 T7 Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.110289396 296.5186944 59.72250492 0.0000 0.047892182 6.19 Notes: Consistent with CalEEMod, worker vehicles assumed to be gasoline and 50% LDA, 25% LDT1, and 25% LDT2. Vendor and haul trips are assumed to be 100% diesel Heavy-Duty Trucks (T7).

Miles per
gallon
Gasoline miles per
gallon
Diesel miles per
gallon

29.16 6.19
898
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub‐Area
Region: El Dorado (LT)Calendar Year: 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028 Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel gas Diesel gas miles/hr vehicles miles/day trips/day 1,000 gallons/day 1,000 gallons/day El Dorado (LT) 2027 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4513.0120 177889.5563 20701.8486 4.9144 0.0000 36.20 El Dorado (LT) 2027 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1083.4259 31859.0395 4450.7252 1.4703 0.0000 21.67 El Dorado (LT) 2027 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5005.9931 180205.3645 22133.9436 7.8005 0.0000 23.10 El Dorado (LT) 2027 T7 Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.2851 301.2510 62.2622 0.0000 0.048227751 6.25 Notes: Consistent with CalEEMod, worker vehicles assumed to be gasoline and 50% LDA, 25% LDT1, and 25% LDT2. Vendor and haul trips are assumed to be 100% diesel Heavy-Duty Trucks (T7).

Miles per
gallon
Gasoline miles per
gallon
Diesel miles per
gallon

29.29 6.25
899
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub‐Area
Region: El Dorado (LT)Calendar Year: 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028 Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel gas Diesel gas miles/hr vehicles miles/day trips/day 1,000 gallons/day 1,000 gallons/day El Dorado (LT) 2028 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4679.700674 186076.9343 21528.97169 5.466070917 0.0000 34.04 El Dorado (LT) 2028 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1028.812666 30047.41794 4212.270905 1.124538125 0.0000 26.72 El Dorado (LT) 2028 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4951.752267 176901.4058 21813.54081 6.868811261 0.0000 25.75 El Dorado (LT) 2028 T7 Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.443573651 305.4986593 64.56512515 0.0000 0.0484 6.31 Notes: Consistent with CalEEMod, worker vehicles assumed to be gasoline and 50% LDA, 25% LDT1, and 25% LDT2. Vendor and haul trips are assumed to be 100% diesel Heavy-Duty Trucks (T7).

30.14 6.31
Miles per
gallon
Gasoline miles per
gallon
Diesel miles per
gallon
900
Operational Energy Summary
Land Use
Electricity
kWh/year
Electricity
MWh/year
Natural Gas
kBTU/year
Natural Gas
therm/year
Arena 399,170 399 329,173 3,292City Park 0 0 0 0Government (Civic Center) 267,000 267 483,500 4,835 Motel 227,383 227 644,827 6,448TOTAL 893,553 894 1,457,500 14,575 901
Energy Calculations Summary
Operational Fuel Use Summary
Fuel Type Fleet Mix (%)
Gallons per
Mile Annual VMT Gallons
Gasoline 98.86% 0.03 102,566
Diesel 1.14% 0.11 4,087
Notes:1. Fleet mix calculated from CalEEMod default values.

2. Gallons per mile calculated from EMFAC 2021.

3. Annual VMT obtained from CalEEMod output file.
3,153,300
902
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: County
Region: SacramentoCalendar Year: 2028
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Gasoline Fuel
Consumption
Diesel Fuel
Consumption
miles/hr vehicles miles/day trips/day 1,000 gallons/day 1,000 gallons/day Fleet Mix El Dorado ( 2040 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 17.86500394 801.4666241 158.9985351 0.083009326 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH El Dorado ( 2040 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6610.278618 247948.4368 30322.26492 6.597278785 All Project Land Uses 0.537634 0.053691 0.194038 0.124297 0.024088 0.005854 0.018660 0.009652 0.000885 0.000000 0.027794 0.000851 0.002555El Dorado ( 2040 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5.629813924 177.6651511 23.93358433 0.003200779El Dorado ( 2040 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 571.5520697 16462.62933 2355.399001 0.534750879 Gas 98.9%El Dorado ( 2040 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.003590905 0.14647516 0.016849114 4.68618E‐06 Diesel 1.1% El Dorado ( 2040 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4416.579127 145675.7653 19080.34267 4.946887658El Dorado ( 2040 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 15.23539837 538.4492575 67.80558015 0.013456014El Dorado ( 2040 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 319.5339374 9431.169188 4760.579561 0.909328569El Dorado ( 2040 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 156.3645837 4605.394842 1966.869756 0.283387659El Dorado ( 2040 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 18.34556401 606.9990766 273.3215689 0.062955446El Dorado ( 2040 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 72.19242191 2146.465233 908.0898495 0.156609224El Dorado ( 2040 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 436.4848757 1917.73851 872.9697514 0.045472737El Dorado ( 2040 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2382.948231 76532.50035 10213.87134 3.13El Dorado ( 2040 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 39.15015517 1106.453437 164.9094385 0.037036193El Dorado ( 2040 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 25.21447185 225.7020639 2.522455764 0.05El Dorado ( 2040 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 21.94286735 165.8708255 2.194286735 0.017707383El Dorado ( 2040 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.448505624 558.6471907 102.2266592 0.089359361 El Dorado ( 2040 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3.199081891 81.0428146 64.00723048 0.02El Dorado ( 2040 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 43.19010331 0 0.009356396El Dorado ( 2040 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 0.665083574 31.84295827 2.660334295 0.002778195El Dorado ( 2040 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 18.45194745 398.1082207 267.184199 0.043762698El Dorado ( 2040 T6 instate heavy Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6.20467704 256.2402602 79.97001592 0.029101287 El Dorado ( 2040 T6 instate small Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 39.40615307 1418.360538 462.1527598 0.152453062 El Dorado ( 2040 T6 Public Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 40.7644697 1578.440963 209.1217296 0.183776313 El Dorado ( 2040 T6 Utility Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1.760787081 71.15657146 22.53807463 0.007446918 El Dorado ( 2040 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20.44145802 734.9158194 408.9926921 0.141097374El Dorado ( 2040 T7 CAIRP Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 28.95879532 5864.193768 665.4731165 0.798806255 El Dorado ( 2040 T7 NNOOS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 31.19961975 8765.658345 716.9672618 1.135994231 El Dorado ( 2040 T7 NOOS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13.52092601 3184.407972 310.7108798 0.417514344 El Dorado ( 2040 T7 Public Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 41.67238226 1659.052844 213.779321 0.281517669 El Dorado ( 2040 T7 Single Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1.940062717 200.639117 18.2753908 0.032226463 El Dorado ( 2040 T7 SWCV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2.293224788 148.6793794 10.54883402 0.047445656 El Dorado ( 2040 T7 Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5.436487756 334.7356896 78.99216709 0.046954442 El Dorado ( 2040 T7 Utility Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1.301959325 52.8360375 16.66507936 0.008398498 El Dorado ( 2040 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 0.0212416 2.124145349 0.425001935 0.000459201

16.44 3.88
TOTAL 533,727 26.3 0.04Total (Gas) 499,651 30.4 0.03
Total (Diesel) 34,076 8.8 0.11
Annual VMT
3,153,300
Mix (%) Miles Gallons
Gas 98.9% 3,117,387 102,566Diesel 1.1% 35,910 4,087
903
Energy Calculations Summary
Construction Fuel Usage Summary
Diesel Gasoline Diesel Diesel
Construction
Year
Off‐road
Equipment
(gallons)
On‐road
(gallons)
On‐road
(gallons) Combined
2022 1,599 174 587 2,186
2023 10,748 3,400 12 10,760
Total Gasoline 3,574 gallons
Total Diesel 12,946 gallons
904
2022 Construction Offroad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Number of days
Average
Daily Factor
Diesel Fuel
Usage
Year Start Date End Date Network Days
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.73
20 0.6 284
Demolition
2022
1/1/2022 1/28/2022
20 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4
20 0.6 474
Site Preparation
2022
1/29/2022 2/1/2022
2 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
3 8 97 0.37
20 0.6 517
Grading
2022
2/2/2022 2/7/2022
4 Site Preparation Graders 1 8 187 0.41 2 0.6 37 Building Construction 2023 1/1/2023 10/6/2023 200Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7 247 0.4 2 0.6 41
Paving
2023
10/7/2023 10/20/2023
10 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes 1 8 97 0.37 2 0.6 17 Architectural Coating 2023 10/21/2023 11/3/2023 10Grading Graders 1 8 187 0.41 4 0.6 74 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 4 0.6 95
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes 2 7 97 0.37 4 0.6 60 TOTAL 1,599
2023 Construction Offroad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Number of days
Average
Daily Factor
Diesel Fuel
Usage
Building Construction Cranes 1 6 231 0.29 200 0.6 2,412 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6 89 0.2 200 0.6 641
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74 200 0.6 2,984 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 6 97 0.37 200 0.6 1,292
Building Construction Welders 3 8 46 0.45 200 0.6 2,981 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6 9 0.56 10 0.6 9
Paving Pavers 1 6 130 0.42 10 0.6 98 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8 132 0.36 10 0.6 114 Paving Rollers 1 7 80 0.38 10 0.6 64 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes 1 8 97 0.37 10 0.6 86 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48 10 0.6 67 TOTAL 10,748
Trips and VMT2022
Phase Name Daily Worker Trip Days per
Year
Total Worker
Trips
Total Vendor
Trips
Total
Hauling
Trips
Worker Trip
Length (miles)
Vendor Trip
Length (miles)
Haul Trip
Length (miles)
Total Worker
Trip Length
(miles)
Total Vendor
Trip Length
(miles)
Total Haul
Trip Length
(miles)
Total gallons of gasoline Total gallons
of diesel
Demolition 5.00 20.00 100.00 0.00 177.00 16.8 6.60 20 1680 0 3540 62 587Site Preparation 8.00 20 160 0.00 0.00 16.8 6.60 20 2688 0 0 99 0Grading 10.00 2 20 0.00 0.00 16.8 6.60 20 336 0 0 12 0 TOTAL 174 587
905
2023
Phase Name Daily Worker Trip Days per
Year
Total Worker
Trips
Total Vendor
Trips
Total
Hauling
Trips
Worker Trip
Length (miles)
Vendor Trip
Length (miles)
Haul Trip
Length (miles)
Total Worker
Trip Length
(miles)
Total Vendor
Trip Length
(miles)
Total Haul
Trip Length
(miles)
Total gallons of gasoline Total gallons
of diesel
Building Construction

27.00 200 5400 11.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.0 90720 72.6 0 3,290 12 Paving 13.00 10 130 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.0 2184 0 0 79 0Architectural Coating

5.00 10 50 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.0 840 0 0 30 0
TOTAL 3,400 12
Notes: Consistent with CalEEMod, worker vehicles assumed to be gasoline and 50% LDA, 25% LDT1, and 25% LDT2. Vendor and haul trips are assumed to be 100% diesel Heavy-Duty Trucks (T7). 906
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub‐Area
Region: El Dorado (LT)Calendar Year: 2022
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel gas Diesel gas miles/hr vehicles miles/day trips/day 1,000 gallons/day 1,000 gallons/day San Mateo 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3934.050804 136875.3622 17584.32144 4.602396081 0.00 29.74 San Mateo 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1380.167356 41012.78512 5804.492676 1.63268769 0.00 25.12 San Mateo 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5244.10864 189721.6053 23682.85259 8.057097344 0.00 23.55 San Mateo 2022 T7 Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3.340865928 274.3183394 48.54278193 0.00 0.045469615 6.03 Notes: Consistent with CalEEMod, worker vehicles assumed to be gasoline and 50% LDA, 25% LDT1, and 25% LDT2. Vendor and haul trips are assumed to be 100% diesel Heavy-Duty Trucks (T7).

Miles per
gallon
Gasoline miles per
gallon
Diesel miles per
gallon

27.04 6.03
907
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub‐Area
Region: El Dorado (LT)Calendar Year: 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel gas Diesel gas miles/hr vehicles miles/day trips/day 1,000 gallons/day 1,000 gallons/day El Dorado (LT) 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4012.6722 145657.7557 18052.1844 4.7729 0.0000 30.52 El Dorado (LT) 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1316.7966 39439.9021 5508.3099 1.5555 0.0000 25.36 El Dorado (LT) 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5204.9344 190242.7722 23400.5622 7.9624 0.0000 23.89 El Dorado (LT) 2023 T7 Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3.5054 280.3124 50.9335 0.0000 0.0462 6.07 Notes: Consistent with CalEEMod, worker vehicles assumed to be gasoline and 50% LDA, 25% LDT1, and 25% LDT2. Vendor and haul trips are assumed to be 100% diesel Heavy-Duty Trucks (T7).

Miles per
gallon
Gasoline miles per
gallon
Diesel miles per
gallon

27.57 6.07
908
Operational Energy Summary
Land Use
Electricity
kWh/year
Electricity
MWh/year
Natural Gas
kBTU/year
Natural Gas
therm/year
Health Club 260,467 260 214,793 2,148
Recreational Swimming Pool 00 0 0
TOTAL 260,467 260 214,793 2,148
909
Energy Calculations Summary
Operational Fuel Use Summary
Fuel Type Fleet Mix (%)
Gallons per
Mile Annual VMT Gallons
Gasoline 98.81% 0.04 3,493
Diesel 1.19% 0.11 107
Notes:1. Fleet mix calculated from CalEEMod default values.

2. Gallons per mile calculated from EMFAC 2021.

3. Annual VMT obtained from CalEEMod output file.
81,979
910
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub‐Area
Region: El Dorado (LT)Calendar Year: 2024
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Gasoline Fuel
Consumption
Diesel Fuel
Consumption
miles/hr vehicles miles/day trips/day 1,000 gallons/day 1,000 gallons/day Fleet Mix El Dorado ( 2024 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 15.76478274 761.3141527 140.3065663 0.086372447 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH El Dorado ( 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4101.455832 153890.1081 18576.59716 4.914361995 All Project Land Uses 0.378954 0.065789 0.258497 0.168857 0.048916 0.010258 0.014095 0.009387 0.001428 0 0.036485 0.001106 0.00623 El Dorado ( 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 17.56668238 567.6061752 74.19375836 0.012528179 El Dorado ( 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1254.924664 37648.17599 5224.542969 1.470336379 Gas 98.8% El Dorado ( 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.000877206 0.044222613 0.004455195 1.52675E‐06 Diesel 1.2% El Dorado ( 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5160.782076 189139.9096 23100.18936 7.800495822 El Dorado ( 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14.65214881 594.8094244 67.85026778 0.01759442 El Dorado ( 2024 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 531.4956827 16791.12985 7918.493744 1.898236379 El Dorado ( 2024 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 409.7616559 14121.75545 5154.286151 0.882696838 El Dorado ( 2024 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 41.28588293 1399.912643 615.0981397 0.170792995 El Dorado ( 2024 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 134.0597975 5137.583353 1686.303606 0.396653867 El Dorado ( 2024 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 546.9686709 2644.886395 1093.937342 0.066642881 El Dorado ( 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2832.288976 92241.85432 12352.41331 4.60562829 El Dorado ( 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 72.32679184 2887.603865 334.4769786 0.108667448 El Dorado ( 2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 93.50080815 772.9058661 9.353820847 0.175541948 El Dorado ( 2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 39.99341466 358.4545856 3.999341466 0.038083484 El Dorado ( 2024 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3.667940659 511.800459 84.28927634 0.093065958 El Dorado ( 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6.770938035 274.9123362 135.4729282 0.057486988 El Dorado ( 2024 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 31.99550515 0 0.006936195 El Dorado ( 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 0.227568962 11.15112501 0.910275847 0.000997133 El Dorado ( 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 27.44878983 570.2131552 397.4584768 0.069357326 El Dorado ( 2024 T6 instate heavy Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6.14208295 279.10685 78.36415805 0.033155648 El Dorado ( 2024 T6 instate small Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 48.8079285 1954.797744 572.7701221 0.228483883 El Dorado ( 2024 T6 Public Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 54.34860631 2200.728554 278.8083504 0.284609972 El Dorado ( 2024 T6 Utility Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3.276840855 137.5832187 41.94356295 0.015506141 El Dorado ( 2024 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 26.28622939 1015.592746 525.9348777 0.219674768El Dorado ( 2024 T7 CAIRP Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 26.82854739 5462.485696 616.5200189 0.893273699 El Dorado ( 2024 T7 NNOOS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 23.99388393 6493.655843 551.3794528 1.043369511 El Dorado ( 2024 T7 NOOS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.1115301 2359.029821 232.3629617 0.385255453 El Dorado ( 2024 T7 Public Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 51.89586555 2242.396453 266.2257903 0.430247986 El Dorado ( 2024 T7 Single Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2.73557035 148.7823492 25.7690727 0.024536769 El Dorado ( 2024 T7 SWCV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3.131783718 202.6762317 14.4062051 0.084163202 El Dorado ( 2024 T7 Tractor Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3.717586632 285.9503889 54.01653377 0.046874151 El Dorado ( 2024 T7 Utility Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1.658573183 75.20771453 21.22973674 0.012945837 El Dorado ( 2024 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 0.002468013 0.577241221 0.049380007 0.000129968

21.38 5.19
TOTAL 543,217 20.4 0.05Total (Gas) 495,831 23.2 0.04
Total (Diesel) 47,386 9.1 0.11
Annual VMT
81979
Mix (%) Miles Gallons
Gas 98.8% 81,002 3,493Diesel 1.2% 977 107
911
Appendix B
Noise Modeling Data
912
Construction Source Noise Prediction Model
Location/Threshold
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
113,542 Excavator 0.4
Residences south of
plan area in Al Tahoe
neighborhood 50
Front End Loader

0.4 Residences east of the
plan area in Bijou
neighborhood 55
Generator

0.5 Inn by the Lake hotel 53
Inn by the Lake hotel 500
Saint Theresa Catholic
Church 490
South Tahoe Middle
School fields 680
South Tahoe Middle
School buildings 1070
Ground Type soft
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.63
Predicted Noise Level 3
Excavator 81.0
Front End Loader 76.0
Generator 79.0
Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Table 4-26 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2018 (pg 86). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2018 (pg 176 and 177).

Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)

83.9 80
58 54
49 58
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Noise Levels
(Lmax) at 50 feet1
85 Leq dBA at 50 feet3
84 82
83 83
913
Leq(equip) = E.L.+10*log (U.F.) - 20*log (D/50) - 10*G*log (D/50) Where: E.L. = Emission Level;
U.F.= Usage Factor;
G = Constant that accounts for topography and ground effects (FTA 2018: pg 86); and D = Distance from source to receiver.
914
Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
HVAC units 70.0 @ 50 soft 10 5 0.62 43.8 @ 500
HVAC units 70.0 @ 50 hard 10 5 0.00 52.5 @ 375
Notes:

Sources:

Computation of the ground factor is based on the equation presentd in Table 4-26 on pg. 86 of FTA 2018, where the distance of the reference noise leve can be adjusted and the usage factor is not applied (i.e., the usage factor is equal to 1).

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available:
<http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-noSTEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance).

STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft),
and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to the
receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics
915
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Table A. Propagation of vibration decibels (VdB) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(VdB) @ (ft) (VdB) @ (ft)
Bulldozer 87 @ 25 79.9 @ 43
The Lv metric (VdB) is used to assess the likelihood for vibration to result in human annoyance.

Table B. Propagation of peak particle velocity (PPV) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(PPV) @ (ft) (PPV) @ (ft)
Bulldozer 0.890 @ 25 0.49 @ 37
The PPV metric (in/sec) is used for assessing the likelihood for the potential of structural damage.

Notes:

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impactassessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf Reference Noise Level
STEP 2A: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference vibration level (VdB) and distance.

Reference Noise Level
Computation of propagated vibration levels is based on the equations presented on pg. 185 of FTA 2018. Estimates of attenuated vibration levels do not account for reductions from intervening underground barriers or other underground structures of any type, or changes in soil type.

Distance Propagation Calculations for
Stationary Sources of Ground Vibration
STEP 1: Determine units in which to perform calculation. — If vibration decibels (VdB), then use Table A and proceed to Steps 2A and 3A. — If peak particle velocity (PPV), then use Table B and proceed to Steps 2B and 3B.

STEP 3A: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 3B: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 2B: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference peak particle velocity (PPV) and distance.
916
Appendix C
56 Acres Master Plan
Transportation Analysis
917
Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants
Prepared for the
The City of South Lake Tahoe, California
October 15, 2021
56 Acres Master Plan
Transportation Analysis
918
56 Acres Master Plan
Transportation Analysis
Prepared for
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Prepared by
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
2690 Lake Forest Road, Ste. C
Tahoe City, CA 96145
530-583-4053
October 15, 2021
Project Number #207430
919
This page intentionally left blank
920
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE
Chapter 1: Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions……. ................................................................................................................ 3 Roadway Characteristics......................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Traffic Volumes.......................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Transit Conditions...................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Conditions............................................................................................. 4 Review of Previous Studies and Plans..................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 3: Future No-Project Traffic Volumes.......................................................................................... 9 Chapter 4: Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment................................................................11 Trip Generation..................................................................................................................................... 11 Trip Distribution and Assignment ......................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 5: Vehicle Miles Traveled................................................................................................................17 Existing Land Use VMT.......................................................................................................................... 17 Total Existing VMT ................................................................................................................................ 19 Total Change in VMT............................................................................................................................. 21 Potential VMT Increase Mitigation Measures....................................................................................... 25 Chapter 6: Level of Service..............................................................................................................................25 Level of Service............................................................................................................................................ 25 Chapter 7: Other Transportation Impacts and Conclusions...............................................................27 Intersection Queuing Analysis..................................................................................................................... 27 Impact on Bicycle and Pedestrian Conditions ............................................................................................. 27 Impact on Transit Services........................................................................................................................... 27 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................. 27

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B
921
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page ii

LIST OF TABLES
TABLES
Table 1: Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes............................................................... 4 Table 2: Non-Auto Travel Mode and Survey Data................................................................................. 13 Table 3: Existing 56 Acres PM Peak-Hour Trip Generation ................................................................... 15 Table 4: Proposed Buildout 56 Acres PM Peak-Hour Trip Generation.................................................. 16 Table 5: SLT 56 Acres Master Plan—Trip Distribution........................................................................... 16 Table 6: Campground/Cabin Average Trip Length ................................................................................ 19 Table 7: Calculation of Event Attendee Trip Length.............................................................................. 19 Table 8: 56 Acres Vehicle-Miles of Travel—Existing ............................................................................. 20 Table 9: 56 Acres Vehicle-Miles of Travel—Impact of Relocation of Land Uses................................... 22 Table 10: 56 Acres Vehicle-Miles of Travel—Proposed Buildout.......................................................... 23 Table 11: Summary of Change in Average Daily VMT ........................................................................... 24 Table 12: SLT 56 Acres—Intersection LOS Summary ............................................................................ 26 922
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1
Chapter 1
Introduction

INTRODUCTION
This document provides a transportation analysis for full buildout of the South Lake Tahoe 56 Acres Master Plan. The 56 Acres Parcel/South Lake Tahoe Recreational Area (56 Acres) is centrally located in the City of South Lake Tahoe directly south of Lake Tahoe. The 56 Acres is bounded by Lake Tahoe Boulevard (US 50) to the west, Lake Tahoe to the north, properties along Lyons Avenue to the south, and Rufus Allen Boulevard to the east. The area is currently the location of the Lake Tahoe Historical Museum, the South Lake Tahoe Parks and Recreational Center and swimming pool, the South Lake Tahoe Ice Arena, the City of Lake Tahoe Campground, an El Dorado County operations facility, and the El Dorado County Library.

About half of the 56 Acres consists of the Campground by the Lake, which includes 178 campsites that accommodate both tent camping and RVs. The surrounding area has a variety of mixed land uses such as commercial retail, restaurants, residential neighborhoods, and schools.

The purpose of this report is to present an analysis of the transportation impacts associated with the proposed project. Initially, existing traffic conditions near the proposed site are discussed. The proposed land uses associated with the project are then assessed in terms of the generation of new traffic. Then the impact vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is evaluated. An appropriate distribution of traffic onto the adjacent roadway system is then identified. Using this distribution pattern, the forecasted generated trips are assigned to the nearby roadway system to identify the impact on intersection Level of Service (LOS).

In addition, intersection queuing analysis is evaluated, along with impacts to bicycle/pedestrian and transit conditions.
923
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 2
This page intentionally left blank
924
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 3
Chapter 2
Existing Conditions
The following discussion presents information regarding existing transportation conditions in the study area.

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
The project site is served by the following existing roadways:

US Highway 50 is the primary highway serving Lake Tahoe’s south shore. As part of its transcontinental route within the region, it connects Carson City on the east with Sacramento on the west. Between the “Y” and Stateline, Nevada, it is the primary east-west roadway, turning south at the “Y” towards Echo Summit. Within the vicinity of the site, this undivided highway contains two travel lanes in each direction, plus a central two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL), and exclusive left-turn lanes at major intersections. US Highway 50 is also called Lake Tahoe Boulevard within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour. In the study area, traffic signals are located at Lyons Avenue, Tallac Avenue, Lakeview Avenue, and Rufus Allen Boulevard.

Rufus Allen Boulevard is a two-lane roadway that intersects US 50 and provides access to a school to the south and recreational uses and residential uses. The posted speed limit on Rufus Allen Boulevard is 15 miles per hour when children are present.

Lyons Avenue is a two-lane roadway that intersects US 50 and provides access to recreational uses to the south. The posted speed limit is 15 miles per hour when children are present.

EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intersection volumes were obtained from previous counts conducted in peak summer conditions in August 2017 for the US 50/Rufus Allen Avenue, Rufus Allen Avenue/Swim Center driveway, Rufus Allen Avenue/Ice Rink driveway, and US 50/Lyons Avenue intersections. Caltrans traffic volumes were reviewed on US 50 east and west of Rufus Allen Boulevard. Counts for the US 50/Tallac Avenue intersection were performed in September 2020. Caltrans count volumes have varied less than one third of one percent (0.33%) over the last five years of available data (2014 to 2018). Therefore, the previous intersection volumes do not need to be adjusted. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Table 1.

EXISTING TRANSIT CONDITIONS
56 Acres is currently served by the Tahoe Transportation District (TTD) Route 50. Route 50 operates daily between 6:30 AM and 8:05 PM eastbound and between 7:00 AM and 8:28 PM westbound. The site is served by two eastbound stops along US 50 (at the Visitor/Senior Center south of San Francisco Avenue and west of Rufus Allen Boulevard) and two westbound stops (north of San Jose Avenue and south of San Francisco Avenue). The first three of these stops have shelters, while all are provided with benches and pullouts. TTD also provides ADA paratransit service during the same hours as fixed route operations. Prior reservations are recommended, though same-day trips are accommodated as capacity allows. 925
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 4
Route 50 annual ridership has slowly declined by 43 percent over the past five fiscal years from 170,682 passengers to 119,322 passengers. ADA paratransit ridership (prior to COVID) was relatively consistent over the year, ranging between 1,000 and 1,500 trips per month.

EXISTING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONDITIONS
Existing Facilities
The site is served by numerous bicycle and pedestrian facilities. A major multi-use path runs along Lake Tahoe Boulevard/US 50 between San Jose Avenue and Stateline. This multiuse path connects to one within 56 Acres that can accessed from Rufus Allan Boulevard and the crosswalk located along Lakeview Avenue and US 50. In addition, bicycle lanes are provided on either side of US 50. A designated bike route Table 1: Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Scenario Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Total Existing No Project Total Volumes
US 50/Rufus Allen 34 0 90 0 0 0 0 1383 93 73 1183 0 2856 Rufus Allen/Library Driveway 8 90 0 0 135 31 34 0 8 0 0 0 306 Rufus Allen/Future Main St/Existing Camping 13 62 0 0 79 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 218 Rufus Allen/Existing Ice Rink Driveway 4 58 0 0 63 15 17 0 5 0 0 0 162 Rufus Allen/Existing Swim Center Driveway 9 62 0 0 52 9 11 0 14 0 0 0 157 US 50/Lyons Ave 0 1364 76 21 1280 0 0 0 0 69 0 20 2830
US 50/Tallac Ave 31 1408 0 0 1274 54 64 0 62 0 0 0 2893 Camping Driveway 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 41
Project Net Impact
US 50/Rufus Allen 3 0 68 0 0 0 0 4 3 71 -3 0 147
Rufus Allen/Library/Rec Center 2 27 0 0 28 46 45 0 2 0 0 0 150 Rufus Allen/Main Street Driveway 5 18 0 0 22 8 11 0 7 0 0 0 71 Rufus Allen/Existing Ice Rink Driveway 23 2 0 0 5 24 20 0 19 0 0 0 93 Rufus Allen/Old Swim Center Driveway 0 25 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 US 50/Lyons Ave 0 70 16 0 80 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 177
US 50/Tallac Ave/Main Street 1 4 64 2 3 0 0 13 0 77 14 2 180 Main Street/Civic Center/Camping 3 0 3 10 0 86 72 4 2 3 3 8 194 Existing Plus Project
US 50/Rufus Allen 21 0 103 0 0 0 0 1383 82 89 1177 0 2856 Rufus Allen/Library/Rec Center 2 74 0 0 115 55 50 0 8 0 0 0 304 Rufus Allen/Main Street Driveway 16 25 0 0 57 65 52 0 7 0 0 0 222 Rufus Allen/Existing Ice Rink Driveway 23 20 0 0 40 24 20 0 19 0 0 0 146 Rufus Allen/Old Swim Center Driveway 0 43 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 US 50/Lyons Ave 0 1423 31 14 1439 0 0 0 0 23 0 13 2943
US 50/Tallac Ave/Main Street 25 1305 105 2 1265 50 60 14 55 133 22 6 3042 Main Street/Civic Center/Camping 3 0 3 10 0 86 72 46 2 3 71 8 304 Future No Project
US 50/Rufus Allen 34 0 90 0 0 0 0 1383 93 73 1198 0 2871 Rufus Allen/Library Driveway 8 90 0 0 135 31 34 0 8 0 0 0 306 Rufus Allen/Future Main Street Driveway 13 62 0 0 79 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 218 Rufus Allen/Existing Ice Rink Driveway 4 58 0 0 63 15 17 0 5 0 0 0 162 Rufus Allen/Existing Swim Center Driveway 9 62 0 0 52 9 11 0 14 0 0 0 157 US 50/Lyons Ave 0 1364 76 21 1307 0 0 0 0 69 0 20 2857
US 50/Tallac Ave 31 1408 0 0 1301 54 64 0 62 0 0 0 2920 Camping Driveway 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 41
Future Plus Project
US 50/Rufus Allen 21 0 103 0 0 0 0 1383 82 89 1192 0 2872 Rufus Allen/Library Driveway 2 74 0 0 115 55 50 0 8 0 0 0 304 Rufus Allen/Future Main Street Driveway 16 25 0 0 57 65 52 0 7 0 0 0 222 Rufus Allen/Existing Ice Rink Driveway 23 20 0 0 40 24 20 0 19 0 0 0 146 Rufus Allen/Existing Swim Center Driveway 0 43 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 US 50/Lyons Ave 0 1423 31 14 1467 0 0 0 0 23 0 13 2971
US 50/Tallac Ave 25 1305 105 2 1291 50 60 14 55 133 22 6 3069 Main Street/Civic Center/Camping 3 0 3 10 0 86 72 46 2 3 71 8 304 Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
926
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 5
also runs along Rufus Allan Boulevard along the east side of the 56 Acres. Various types of permanent bicycle racks exist throughout South Lake Tahoe. They are frequently installed adjacent to major businesses as well as near transit stops and major parking areas within 56 Acres. Lastly, sidewalks and crosswalks are located at major intersections along US 50.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes
TRPA monitors bicycle and pedestrian activity throughout Lake Tahoe to understand high use areas. The highest volume of bicycle and pedestrian use along the shared path occurred during Labor Day weekend (Sunday, September 3rd) of 2017 at 1,882 users, followed by July 4th (1,451 users), and Memorial Day (May 28th) at 1,347 users. Between November and April, path user volume tends to stay under 200 users per day.

Overall Non-Auto Access
In sum, the site is served by relatively good transit and bicycle/pedestrian access opportunities. The location near major trip generators (such as shopping) also makes the site relatively conducive to nonauto travel.

REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES AND PLANS
Over the past two decades, there have been many plans evaluating the 56 Acres area. These studies and their relevance to the 56 Acres Master Plan are described below, from most recent to oldest.

Regional Transportation Plan (2020)
A draft of the Linking Tahoe: Regional Transportation Plan was released in early 2020. The plan considers the entire Lake Tahoe basin and provides a 2045 Regional Transportation Vision. The plan ultimately includes water transit, bicycle, and pedestrian trail improvements as well as regional transit connections with implementation milestones in 2025, 2035, and 2045. Over the next five years, the plan aims to increase regional transit connections, create seven miles of new trails, provide real-time parking information for select east shore locations, and encourage more opportunities for carpooling throughout the region.

Planned improvements that will directly impact the 56 Acres area include a public private partnership with existing water taxi service along south shore, improved shared-use trail conditions along US 50, and DC fast charging hubs located near the site to support electric scooters and bicycles. All of these projects would increase mobility to and from 56 Acres parcel through the encouragement of alternative modes of travel within the region.

Tahoe Transportation District Short Range Transit Plan (2017) The Short-Range Transit Plan (SRTP), completed by the TTD, provides policies that aim to improve safety, workforce development, fleet expansion/replacement, facility capacity, and future service options. In addition, the SRTP gives an overview of existing service characteristics, ridership trends, and current operational details. Of the various proposed routes, the Emerald Bay High Frequency Route will impact the 56 Acres parcel the most by increasing frequency of Route 50 to meet the demand of the new route. 927
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 6
However, as of 2020 this route has not been implemented and financial limitations are expected to preclude this improvement without new funding sources.

South Lake Tahoe Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan (2014) The Master Plan provides a summary of existing recreational facilities in South Lake Tahoe as well as recommendations for future improvements for the region. Key recommendations include improving regional coordination, maintaining existing facilities, developing new facilities, programming additional recreational activities, and ensuring operations and management. The plan also prioritizes actions by easily attainable “quick wins” to be implemented in the first year and more difficult to achieve, long term goals. The primary recommendations affecting the 56 Acres area includes the following:
• South Lake Tahoe Recreation Area campground upgrades
• South Lake Tahoe Recreation Area shop relocation
• Recreation/Aquatic Center master plan (Community Outreach) The Master Plan identifies the 56 Acres area as an opportune site for coordinated City and County efforts towards funding and improvement. As a part of these efforts, the plan recommends updating the design concept, constructing a front entry to the park from US 50, creating a plaza and crosswalk to connect the park to the Lakeview Commons, upgrading the campground, relocating the Public Works, and improving internal access and connectivity throughout the area.

US 50 Transportation Concept Report and Corridor System Management Plan (2014) Caltrans prepared a Transportation Concept Report for US Route 50 in District 3 in 2014. For the highway segment that passes by the 56 Acres, the construction of Class II bicycle lanes is included in the plan. As of 2020, there does not appear to be any Class II bicycle lanes running east or west along this corridor. 2030 South Lake Tahoe General Plan (2011)
The 2030 South Lake Tahoe General Plan was completed through public outreach and multi-jurisdiction coordination. The document provides a summary of goals, policies, and programs to fulfill the environmental, economic, and socially sustainable objectives of South Lake Tahoe. The Transportation and Circulation Element of the plan emphasized policies and goals organized under six categories. Various policies were identified for the continued improvement of US 50. These policies include improving traffic flows, implementing adaptive signal timing to prioritize transit, and increasing bicycle lanes and pedestrian paths along the corridor.

Lake Tahoe Region Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2010)
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (BPP) considers the entire Lake Tahoe Basin for recommended improvements to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The planning process was centered around path/lane construction and connectivity, path/lane maintenance, safety and education, and programs. Fixing gaps in the existing network, multi-modal connectivity, and environmental impacts were also considered in prioritizing projects.
928
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 7
The plan calls for Class II bicycle lanes along both sides of US 50 and Lake Tahoe Boulevard, sidewalks along the south side of US 50/Tahoe Lake Boulevard, and a shared use Class I lane along the north side of Lake Tahoe Boulevard between Rufus Allen Boulevard and Ski Run Boulevard. As of 2020, there are sidewalks located along south side of US 50/Lake Tahoe Boulevard. as well as a shared-use Class I path on the north side of Lake Tahoe Boulevard. Currently there is a small shoulder on US 50/Lake Tahoe Boulevard, but it does not appear to be a sanctioned bicycle lane.

Bijou/Al Tahoe Community Plan (1995)
The 56 Acres area is a part of the Bijou/Al Tahoe Community Plan of South Lake Tahoe. The Commercial Plan recognizes the commercial node and tourist characteristics of the area while establishing goals, objectives, and policies to achieve a 2007 vision. The plan proposed transportation, bicycle, pedestrian, and road improvements, many of which have since been implemented. 929
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 8
This page intentionally left blank
930
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 9
Chapter 3
Future No-Project Traffic Volumes
Future traffic volumes not associated with the proposed project were developed using volumes provided by TRPA from the regional TransCAD travel demand model. The travel demand model has a base year of 2018 and projects volumes to the year 2045. The daily volumes represent a “model day,” which is an early (June) and late (September) summer weekday (Monday thru Thursday). Due to limitations with the model, projections are available only at US 50/Rufus Allen Boulevard and US 50/Lyons Avenue.

At US 50 and Rufus Allen Boulevard, the 2018 base volumes were 3,899 in the eastbound direction and 4,476 in the westbound direction. For the 2045 year, the eastbound volumes would decrease to 3,869 (0.0.0% annual change) and the westbound volumes would increase to 4,534 (0.05% annual increase). At US 50 and Lyons Avenue, the 2018 base volumes were 3,982 in the northbound direction and 4,637 in the southbound direction. For the 2045 year, the northbound volumes would increase to 3,983 (0.0% annual change) and the westbound volumes would increase to 4,734 (0.07% annual increase).

These growth factors were then applied to the through volumes of the Existing No Project set of volumes which resulted in the Future No Project set of volumes as seen in Table 1, above. 931
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 10
This page intentionally left blank
932
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 11
Chapter 4
Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment

TRIP GENERATION
The basis for the VMT analysis as well as the Level of Service analysis is an assessment of the impacts of the proposed land use changes on daily and peak-hour trip generation. For most uses, the daily trip generation rate identified in Trip Generation 10th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2017) was applied. By use, the following was used to define trip generation:
• Recreation Center—Traffic counts were conducted in 2017 as part of the separate Recreation Center traffic analysis and are used directly to define the daily vehicle-trips. • Ice Skating Center—While ITE does not provide daily rates by KSF for this use, a PM peak-hour rate per KSF is available as well as PM peak-hour and daily rates per seat. The ratio of daily to peak-hour rates per seat was applied to the peak-hour rate per KSF to identify the daily rate per KSF.
• Campground—ITE does not provide a daily rate per campground site but does provide a PM peak-hour rate. This was factored based on the ratio of daily to PM peak-hour rates for the Motel land use to identify a daily rate of 4.02 per site. As a check, two other transportation analyses for campgrounds were reviewed:
o The Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center Transportation Impact Analysis (Chen Ryan, September 2018) assumed a rate of 4.0 vehicle-trips per site per day.
o The Traffic Impact Analysis—Under Canvas, Teton study conducted by SET Engineering in November 2021 used a rate of 2.0 vehicle-trips per site per day (for a development with a high level of internal amenities).
o Based on this information, the calculated rate of 4.02 is appropriate. • Cabin—The ITE rate for the Motel land use was applied. • Library—The ITE rate was used.
• Senior Center—As no daily rate is available for a Senior Center, daily trips were estimated as follows:
o The daily attendance is reported to be 41.
933
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 12
o A non-auto rate of 10 percent is applied. Additional discussion of non-auto travel in the area is presented below.
o An Average Vehicle Occupancy (AVO) of 1.5 is assumed. o Factoring the attendance by the non-auto reduction and dividing by the average vehicle occupancy yields 25 daily attendee vehicle round-trips, or 50 one-way vehicle-trips. o Four employees are assumed to report to work at the Senior Center each day, with a nonauto mode share of 37 percent and average vehicle occupancy of 1.26 (based on TRPA TransCAD model data). This results in 4 employee vehicle-trips per day. o Two utility (food delivery, refuse, etc.) visits are assumed to occur per day, or 4 one-way vehicle trips.
o In sum, the Senior Center is estimated to generate 58 one-way vehicle-trips per day. • Historical Museum—While ITE provide a PM peak-hour rate for the Museum land use, no daily rate is available. The Museum peak-hour rate was factored by the ratio of the daily to peak-hour rates for the Library land use to estimate a daily Museum rate. • Art Museum—The ITE daily rate for a Craft Store was applied. • Chamber Office—The ITE daily rate for a Government Office Building was applied. • Outdoor Events—As standard rates for outdoor concert events are not available, trip generation was estimated as follows:
o The project proponent indicates that events will range from 500 to 1,000 attendees. A median value of 750 was assumed.
o The Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority in 2018 conducted surveys at the Harveys Outdoor Amphitheater indicating that 18 percent of attendees arrive by non-auto means. Reflecting that there is a lower number of residences/lodging units within a convenient walking distance of the 56 Acres Site, this factor was reduced by 25 percent to 13.5 percent. o These same surveys indicated an AVO of 2.77, which was directly applied. o Factoring for non-auto access, dividing by the AVO, and multiplying by to 2 convert to oneway vehicle-trips, the attendees are estimated to generate 468 vehicle-trips per event. o An average of 25 employees (performers, security, concessions, etc.) are estimated. 934
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 13
o A relatively low proportion of employee non-auto travel of 15 percent is assumed, reflecting that workers at an episodic event are less likely to use non-auto modes. o An employee average vehicle occupancy of 1.26 is applied. In total, workers are estimated to generate 38 vehicle-trips.
o An average of 10 utility vehicles (20 one-way vehicle-trips) is assumed. o In total, an average concert event generated 522 vehicle-trips. • Passive Park Uses—The ITE rate for a Public Park is applied. • Corporation Yard and Vector Control Uses—The ITE rate for General Light Industrial is applied. • Fire Training Facility—The ITE rate for Community/Junior College is applied.

Reduction for Non-Auto Trips
Standard trip generation rates are largely based on studies conducted in typical suburban settings that have limited bicycling, walking and transit travel. The Tahoe Region, in comparison, has a relatively high level of non-auto travel (particularly among those walking and cycling) reflecting the recreational economy. As such, it is appropriate to consider reduction in trip generation associated with non-auto travel.

Fortunately, TRPA has a long-standing program to conduct travel surveys of persons in key commercial and recreational activity centers around the region. Summer surveys—generating data on travel modes and patterns—are conducted every four years. The responses collected over the last two surveys (in 2014 and 2018) were analyzed for the location between Ski Run Boulevard on the east and the South Y on the west and are summarized in Table 2. Note that the responses for the Stateline area (which has an even higher proportion of non-auto travel) were excluded from this review.

TABLE 2: Non-Auto Travel Mode Survey Data
Person Type
Trip
Purpose
Total
Surveys Non-auto Non-Auto %
Resident Commercial 186 38 20%
Visitor Commercial 160 40 25%
Visitor Recreation 528 130 25%
Resident Work 196 72 37%
Resident Recreation 101 24 24%
Total Visitor 688 170 25%
Source: TRPA Travel Surveys conducted in Summer 2014 and Summer 2018 for areas between Ski Run on the east and South Y on the west. 935
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 14
As shown, depending on the type of respondent and trip purpose, non-auto travel ranges from 20 percent to 37 percent. This data was used as the basis for the individual non-auto factors by use, as discussed below:
• Ice Skating Center—The observed resident recreational non-auto proportion was reduced by 50 percent reflecting the need to carry sports equipment, to 12 percent. • Campsites and Cabins—The proportion of total trips generated by the regional access trip (travel to and from Tahoe from the visitor’s home or airport) was first calculated. City Parks and Recreation Department data for the existing campground indicates an average length of stay of

2.4 days. This is equivalent to 0.82 access trips per site per day. Divided by the total trips per site per day (4.02), 20 percent of the total trips generated by a campsite are regional access trips.

None of the regional access trips are assumed to be by non-auto modes, while the proportion of local trips (such as travel to restaurants, beach, etc.) is 25 percent (per the total visitor non-auto mode survey data). Overall, 20 percent of all visitor trips are by non-auto modes. • Library—The resident recreation non-auto mode factor was applied. • Museum and Art Center—The visitor commercial non-auto mode factor was applied. • Chamber Office—A relatively low (10 percent) factor was applied, reflecting that visitors will be predominantly arriving by car and that employees are less seasonal. • Passive Park Space—The visitor recreation non-auto mode factor was applied.

No non-auto reductions were assumed for the corporation yard, vector control and fire training facility.

Pass-by Reductions
“Pass-by trips” consist of trips generated by drivers already passing by a site (such as along US 50, in this case) that simply make an additional stop as part of a longer trip. For instance, a high proportion of trips generated by a gas station are pass-by trips. These trips result in new turning movements at site access intersections but do not add to traffic volumes on the regional access roads or to regional VMT. The ITE Trip General Handbook (3rd edition) provides data on pass-by proportions for many land use types.

Most of the existing land uses generate primary trips rather than pass-by trips. For example, campground trips and employment trips are primary trips. However, there are several existing uses that generate passby trips, consisting of the Library, Museum, and Art Center uses. As pass-by data is not available for these uses, the ITE pass-by factor for Variety Store retail use (37 percent) was applied. While there may be other uses (recreation center, ice rink, passive park uses) that have some pass-by trip activity, this is assumed to be zero as no applicable data is available and in order to be conservative.

Trip Generation at Site Driveways
Multiplying the land use quantities by the trip rates and applying reductions for non-auto trips and passby trips yields the vehicle trips generated at the site driveways for proposed project conditions. As shown 936
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 15
in Tables 3 and 4, the proposed land uses are forecasted to generate a total of approximately 4,844 oneway daily vehicle trips (DVTE) at the site driveways on a weekday, including 451 PM peak-hour vehicletrips (223 inbound plus 228 outbound). The existing land uses are forecasted to generate a total of approximately 3,376 one-way daily vehicle trips (DVTE) at the site driveways on a weekday, including 295 PM peak-hour vehicle-trips (149 inbound plus 146 outbound). Subtracting the proposed daily vehicle trips from the existing daily vehicle trips results in a net increase of 1,468 daily vehicle trips, including 156 PM peak-hour vehicle-trips (74 inbound plus 82 outbound) upon full buildout of the project.

TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
The trip distribution pattern for new trip generated on the project site was developed based on the proportion of South Lake Tahoe population in various directions from the site, the convenience of various access routes, and the regional access patterns. In particular, the fact that much of the uses are municipal in nature indicates that the site’s location with regards to citywide population is an important factor. The results are shown in Table 5. Trips from the existing land uses were assigned to study intersections. These trips were then removed from the existing no project scenario to create an “existing volumes minus existing 56 Acres site land use” set of volumes.

With construction of the new Main Street, some existing trips will be diverted to using the new Main Street rather than using their original route. For instance, trips between US 50 south of the site and the library can be expected to shift to use Main Street. The trips from the “existing volumes minus existing 56 Acres site land uses” were redistributed to incorporate the new Main Steet.

TABLE 3: Existing 56 Acres PM Peak-Hour Trip Generation Building/Area PM % In Total In Out In Out In Out
Recreation Center 39 KSF 952 -- -- 76 35 41 0 0 35 41
Ice Skating Center 37 KSF 516 2.63 55% 86 47 39 0 0 47 39 Campground 172 Occupied Sites 553 0.27 65% 37 24 13 0 0 24 13 Cabins 7 Occupied Rooms 49 0.74 45% 4 2 2 0 0 2 2
Library 15 KSF 544 8.16 48% 62 30 32 15 16 14 16
Senior Center 41 Daily Attendees 58 -- -- 6 1 4 0 0 1 4 Historical Museum 2.1 KSF 3 0.66 71% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Art Center 1.144 KSF 32 6.21 46% 4 2 2 1 1 1 1
Chamber Office (?) 3 KSF 61 3.19 43% 9 4 5 0 0 4 5
Outdoor Event Space 750 Attendees 522 -- --
Passive Park Space 2.7 Acres 4 0.31 39% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Corp Yard 3.864 KSF 19 0.83 18% 3 1 3 0 0 1 3
Vector Control 3.4 KSF 17 0.83 18% 3 1 2 0 0 1 2
Fire Training Facility 2.25 KSF 46 2.27 48% 5 2 3 0 0 2 3 TOTAL 3,376 295 149 146 16 18 132 129
Existing Uses (1)
PM Pk Hr Trip
Generation
Rate
Passby
Site Driveways Reductions
New External
Trips
Peak Day PM Peak-Hour
Not Included in Base Analysis
Daily
Trips
937
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 16
The trip distribution pattern for vehicle trips made to/from the project are then estimated for the proposed land uses. These trips were then assigned to study intersections resulting in the “Project Net Impact” volume set as shown in Table 1. These volumes were then added to the “exiting volumes minus existing 56 Acres site land use” volumes to create the “Existing plus Project” set of volumes as seen in Table 1.

The “existing volumes minus existing 56 Acres site land uses” through volumes were increased using the same growth factors as mentioned previously. Using these growth volumes and adding the “Project Net Impact” results in the “Future plus Project” set of volumes as seen in the bottom of Table 1.

TABLE 4: Proposed Buildout 56 Acres PM Peak-Hour Trip Generation Building/Area PM % In Total In Out In Out In Out
Recreation Center 62.72 KSF 1446 2.31 0.47 115 53 62 0 0 53 62 Ice Skating Center 37.00 KSF 516 2.63 55% 86 47 39 0 0 47 39 Campground 118 Occupied Sites 379 0.27 65% 25 17 9 0 0 17 9 Cabins 17 Occupied Rooms 118 0.74 45% 10 5 6 0 0 5 6
Library 15 KSF 544 8.16 48% 62 30 32 15 16 14 16
Senior Center 41 Daily Attendees 58 -- -- 6 1 4 0 0 1 4 Historical Museum 2.1 KSF 3 0.66 71% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Art Center 1.144 KSF 32 6.21 46% 4 2 2 1 1 1 1
Chamber Office 3 KSF 61 3.19 43% 9 4 5 0 0 4 5
Outdoor Event Space -
Lakeview Commons
750 Attendees 522 -- --
New Outdoor Event Space 375 Attendees 261 -- --
Passive Park Space 6.00 Acres 10 0.31 39% 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 New Civic Center Building 25.00 KSF 508 3.19 43% 72 31 41 0 0 31 41 TOTAL 4,458 390 190 201 16 18 173 183
Net Change 1,082 95 41 54 0 0 41 54
Daily
Trips
PM Pk Hr Trip
Generation
Rate
Passby
Reductions
Peak Day PM Peak-Hour
Site Driveways
New External
Trips
Not Included in Base Analysis
Not Included in Base Analysis
Proposed Uses
Table 5: SLT 56 Acres Master Plan - Trip Distribution
Origin/Destination Percent of Traffic
US 50 South of Lyons Avenue 48%
Tallac Avenue West of US 50 7%
Lakeview Avenue West of US 50 3%
US 50 East of Rufus Allen Blvd 39%
Pickett Avenue East of Rufus Allen Blvd 2%
Area Along Lyons Ave/Rufus Allen Blvd S. of 56 Acres 1% Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
938
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 17
Chapter 5
Vehicle Miles Traveled
Vehicle miles traveled was evaluated in accordance with TRPA’s “Project Impact Analysis Update: Project Impact Assessment and Air Quality Mitigation Fee Framework” (TRPA April 21, 2021). For this multi-use project, each land use is analyzed independently and then summed. As existing uses will be modified, it is necessary to assess VMT both for existing uses as well as buildout future uses. This analysis is conducted under the CEQA analysis guidelines, by which the total trip length (regardless of jurisdiction) is considered.

EXISTING LAND USE VMT
Existing VMT is calculated by multiplying trip generation by an annual-to-peak daily factor and multiplying by the average trip length for each.

Average Annual Daily Trip Factors
Table 3, above, presents the peak daily trip generation for existing land uses. It is important to note that this figure represents trip generation during the busiest season of each land use (largely, but not entirely, summer). VMT analysis, however, is conducted on an average annual daily basis, reflecting that it is a basis for overall greenhouse gas emissions. It is therefore necessary to define factors that reflect the ratio of average daily activity (and thus trip generation) to peak daily activity. These factors were defined as follows:
• Recreation Center—City Parks and Recreation Department provided data for the existing recreation center daily use and campground/cabins for the 2018 calendar year. • Ice Skating Center—The Tahoe Ice Arena 2021 Seasonal Usage Estimates Study was analyzed to develop an appropriate factor.
• Campground/Cabins—City Parks and Recreation Department provided data for the existing recreation center and campground/cabins for the 2017 season (April 1 to October 31). The utilization rate during the season was calculated separately for the campground sites and the cabins, and then factored by the proportion of total annual days in the operating season. Note that this assumes cabins are available year-round.
• Library and Chamber Office—A factor of 0.82 was applied, reflecting operations 6 pays per week and 12 annual holidays.
• Senior Center and Art Museum—The factor of 0.68 reflects operations 5 days per week and 12 annual holidays.
• Museum—The factor of 0.41 reflects operations 3 days per week and 7 annual holidays on days of operation.
939
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 18
• Outdoor Event Space—As a maximum of 10 events are held per year (per City input), the factor reflects that events occur on only 3 percent of annual days. • Passive Park Use—The ITE ratio of peak weekly (Sunday) to average daily trip generation was applied and assumed to occur throughout the year.
• Corp Yard—Operation was assumed 5 days per week, with 12 holidays per year. • Vector Control—This facility typically operates 5 days per week (excluding holidays) from April 1st to mid-November.
• Fire Training Facility—Classes were assumed to be held 60 days per year.

Average Trip Length
The final data element needed to define VMT is the average vehicle trip-length (in miles). These values were defined as follows:
• Recreation Center, Library, Senior Center, Passive Park Use—These uses are assumed to be used in large part by City of South Lake Tahoe residents. An average trip length of 2.60 was defined by identifying the travel distance to the 53 individual Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) in the TRPA TransCAD regional transportation model and weighting them by the population in each TAZ (per TRPA data) to define the average overall trip length.
• Ice Skating Center—This facility will have a broader overall attendee area, as the only ice facility of regulation size in the South Shore. A similar TAZ population weighted trip length analysis was conducted, assuming attendee travel from all of the South Shore. • Campground and Cabin—These land uses generate two types of trips: regional access trips (to and from Tahoe) and local trips. As discussed above, 20 percent of trips generated by these land uses are regional access trips. Table 6 presents an analysis of the average trip length for these regional access trips, assuming that the preponderance of such trips come from residents of Nevada and California, indicating an average trip length of 219 miles. For local trips, the zonal average trip length identified by TRPA for the VMT analysis zone encompassing the 56 Acres Parcel (4.51 miles) was used. The weighted average of these lengths is 47.4 miles. • Museum, Art Center, Corporation Yard, Vector Control, Fire Training Facility—The TRPA average trip length for the VMT analysis zone of 4.51 is applied. • Special Events—Events at the 56 Acres typically generate most of the attendance from the South Shore region, though some attendees may come from other portions of the Tahoe Region. Table 7 presents an estimate of the regional distribution of origination locations for event attendees, and the corresponding mileage. As shown, the weighted average trip length is 4.8 miles. 940
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 19

TOTAL EXISTING VMT
Multiplying the average daily trips by the average trip length for each use category and summing over all categories yields a total average daily VMT generated by existing 56 Acres uses of 12,523. Of this total, by far the largest proportion is generated by the campground, with 7,262 VMT (58 percent of the total), along with 485 (3.9 percent) generated by the cabins. This is in large part a result of the relatively long average trip length associated with regional access trips. The only other land uses generating more than 10 percent of the total VMT is the Recreation Center, with 1,433 VMT and the Ice Skating Center with 1,546. The results are shown in Table 8.

Origination Percent of Trips
Regional Access Trip Origin/Destination
Reno/Sparks/RTIA 12% 59
Sacramento 20% 100
Bay Area 39% 180
Central Valley 8% 265
Los Angeles 12% 440
Las Vegas 4% 460
San Diego Region 6% 528
% Of Total Trips
Weighted Average: Regional Access 20% 218.78
Local Trip Average Length 80% 4.51
Total Campground/Cabin Avg. Trip Length 47.36
Based on LTVA survey of concert attendees.

TABLE 6: Campground/Cabin Average Trip Length
Trip Length
(Miles)
TABLE 7: Calculation of Event Attendee Trip Length
Trip Origin
Distance
(Miles) Proportion of Event Attendees
North Shore 29.4 4%
West Shore 25.0 3%
Camp Richardson 5.7 8%
Meyers/Pioneer Trail South 7.0 10%
Tahoe Keys 4.4 8%
Tahoe Valley 3.4 11%
Bijou/Al Tahoe 0.8 16%
Pioneer Trail North/Ski Run 2.8 12%
Casino Core (W. of Stateline) 2.0 17%
Stateline 2.4 5%
Lower Kingsbury 3.4 3%
Upper Kingsbury 5.9 1%
Round Hill 4.6 2%
East Shore (North of Round Hill) 9.0 1%
100%
Weighted Average 4.8
Source: LTVA surveys of event attendees, adjusted by LSC for local events. 941
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 20 TABLE 8: 56 Acres Vehicle-Miles of Travel -- Existing Building/Area ITE Use Category ITE # Land Use Units Existing Uses (1) Daily Trip Generation Rate Non-Auto Reduction Pass-By Reduction Daily Trips Average/ Peak Day Factor Average Daily Trips Average Trip Length (Miles) Average Daily VMT % of Avg Daily VMT Recreation Center Recreational Community Center 495 KSF 39 -- -- -- 952 0.58 552 2.60 1,433 11.4% Ice Skating Center Ice Skating Rink 465 KSF 37 15.84 12% 0% 516 0.70 361 4.28 1,546 12.3% Campground Campground/Recreational Vehicle Park 416 Occupied Sites 172 4.02 20% 0% 553 0.28 153 47.4 7,262 58.0% Cabins Motel 320 Occupied Rooms 7 8.71 20% 0% 49 0.21 10 47.4 485 3.9% Library Library 590 KSF 15 72.05 24% 34% 544 0.82 448 2.60 1,164 9.3% Senior Center NA NA # Daily Attendees 41 attendees -- -- 0% 58 0.68 40 2.60 103 0.8% Historical Museum Museum 580 KSF 2.10 2.91 25% 34% 3 0.41 1 4.51 6 0.0% Art Center Craft Store 879 KSF 1.14 56.55 25% 34% 32 0.68 22 4.51 98 0.8% Chamber Office Government Office Building 730 KSF 3.00 22.59 10% 0% 61 0.82 50 4.51 227 1.8% Outdoor Event Space NA NA Attendees 750 -- -- 0% 522 0.03 14 4.84 69 0.6% Passive Park Space Public Park 411 Acres 2.70 2.19 25% 0% 4 0.53 2 2.60 5 0.0% Corp Yard General Light Industrial 110 KSF 3.86 4.96 0% 0% 19 0.68 13 4.51 58 0.5% Vector Control General Light Industrial 110 KSF 3.4 4.96 0% 0% 17 0.43 7 4.51 33 0.3% Fire Training Facility Community College 540 KSF 2.25 20.25 0% 0% 46 0.16 8 4.51 34 0.3% TOTAL 3,376 1,682 12,523 100.0% Note 1: Includes uses within the previous 5 years CEQA VMT Analysis 942
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 21
Future Buildout VMT Analysis
The future VMT associated with the project consists of two elements: the VMT effects of shifting land uses to and from the site, and the VMT generated by future land uses on the 56 Acres Parcel. The following relocations are expected by upon full build-out of the project:
• The existing vector control facility and corporation yard would be relocated to the industrial corridor of South Lake Tahoe (i.e., South Y Industrial Area). • The fire training facility will be located off-site to a location near Bijou Park and LTCC area. • The existing City Hall land uses currently at the airport would shift to the site. • The existing Planning Department uses current at the old City Hall site on Tata Lane would shift to the site.

The VMT associated with these relocated land uses are shown in Table 9.

Multiplying the average daily trips by the average trip length for each use category and summing over all categories yields a total average daily VMT generated by the proposed 56 Acres uses of 15,039. Of this total, by far the largest proportion is generated by the campground, with 4,977 VMT (33 percent of the total), along with 3,468 (23 percent) generated by the cabins. This is in large part a result of the relatively long average trip length associated with regional access trips. The only other three land uses generating more than 10 percent of the total VMT is the Ice-Skating Center with 2,580 VMT and the Recreation Center with 2,176 VMT. The results are shown in Table 10.

TOTAL CHANGE IN VMT
The net change in VMT for the project is calculated by taking the VMT from the buildout on the 56 Acres Parcel, subtracting the existing VMT and adding the net change in VMT elsewhere for each land use, and then summing over all land use categories. As shown in Table 11, the net increase for the project (considering the total trip length, per CEQA requirements) is 1,123 total VMT (a 9 percent increase in VMT).

The City of South Lake Tahoe has not established formal significance criteria for VMT analysis. However, the TRPA has adopted standards, including a screening value, as presented in the TRPA Project Impact Assessment Guidelines (June 2021). This indicates that projects that result in a net increase of average annual daily VMT not less than 1,300 within a town or regional center or a half-mile distance of a town or regional center (which the 56-Acre site is) is a low-VMT proposal that is not considered significant. For purposes of this analysis, the TRPA criteria is applied. Based on this criteria, there is no need to evaluate specific mitigation measures to reduce VMT, beyond the payment of regional VMT mitigation fees. 943
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 22 TABLE 9: 56 Acres Vehicle-Miles of Travel -- Impact of Relocation of Land Uses Building/Area ITE Use Category ITE # Land Use Units Relocated Quantity Daily Trip Generation Rate Non-Auto Reduction Pass-By Reduction Daily Trips Average/ Peak Day Factor Average Daily Trips Average Trip Length (Miles) Average Daily VMT Uses Eliminated Elsewhere Existing City Hall Functions at Airport Government Office Building 730 KSF -16.67 22.59 4% 0% -362 0.82 -298 3.95 -1179 Existing Planning Department Functions at Tata Lane Government Office Building 730 KSF -7.4 22.59 10% 0% -150 0.82 -124 2.71 -335 Uses Relocated Elsewhere Corp Yard General Light Industrial 110 KSF 3.86 4.96 0% 0% 19 0.68 13 4.51 58 Vector Control General Light Industrial 110 KSF 3.4 4.96 0% 0% 17 0.43 7 4.31 32 Fire Training Facility Community College 540 KSF 2.25 20.25 0% 0% 46 0.16 8 4.13 31 TOTAL -394 -1,393 944
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 23 TABLE 10: 56 Acres Vehicle-Miles of Travel -- Proposed Buildout Building/Area ITE Use Category ITE # Land Use Units Proposed Buildout Quantity Daily Trip Generation Rate Non-Auto Reduction Pass-By Reduction Daily Trips Average/ Peak Day Factor Average Daily Trips Average Trip Length (Miles) Average Daily VMT % of Avg Daily VMT Recreation Center Recreational Community Center 495 KSF 62.72 28.82 20% 0% 1,446 0.58 838 2.60 2,176 14.5% Ice Skating Center Ice Skating Rink 465 KSF 37.00 15.84 12% 0% 516 0.70 361 4.28 1,546 10.3% Campground Campground/Recreational Vehicle Park 416 Occupied Sites 118 4.02 20% 0% 379 0.28 105 47.4 4,977 33.1% Cabins Motel 320 Occupied Rooms 17 8.71 20% 0% 118 0.62 73 47.4 3,468 23.1% Library Library 590 KSF 15 72.05 24% 34% 544 0.82 448 2.60 1,164 7.7% Senior Center NA NA # Daily Attendees 41 attendees -- -- 0% 58 0.68 40 2.60 103 0.7% Historical Museum Museum 580 KSF 2.10 2.91 25% 34% 3 0.41 1 4.51 6 0.0% Art Center Craft Store 879 KSF 1.14 56.55 25% 34% 32 0.68 22 4.51 98 0.7% Chamber Office Government Office Building 730 KSF 3.00 22.59 10% 0% 61 0.82 50 4.51 227 1.5% Outdoor Event Space - Lakeview Commons NA NA Attendees 750 -- -- 0% 522 0.03 14 4.84 69 0.5% New Outdoor Event Space NA NA Attendees 375 -- -- 0% 261 0.08 21 4.84 104 0.7% Passive Park Space Public Park 411 Acres 6.00 2.19 25% 0% 10 0.53 5 2.60 14 0.1% New Civic Center Building Government Office Building 730 KSF 25.00 22.59 10% 0% 508 0.82 419 2.60 1,087 7.2% TOTAL 4,458 2,399 15,039 100.0% CEQA VMT Analysis 945
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 24
TABLE 11: Summary of Change in Average Daily VMT
Existing on 56
Acre Parcel
Buildout on 56
Parcel
Change in VMT
Elsewhere
Net
Change
Recreation Center 1,433 2,176 0 743
Ice Skating Center 1,546 1,546 0 0
Campground 7,262 4,977 0 -2,285
Cabins 485 3,468 0 2,983
Library 1,164 1,164 0 0
Senior Center 103 103 0 0
Historical Museum 6 6 0 0
Art Center 98 98 0 0
Chamber Office 227 227 0 0
Outdoor Event Spaces 69 173 0 104
Passive Park Space 5 14 0 9
Municipal Office Uses 0 1,087 -1,514 -427
Corp Yard 58 0 58 0
Vector Control 33 0 32 -1
Fire Training Facility 34 0 31 -3
TOTAL 12,523 15,039 -1,393 1,123
Percent Change 9%
Subtotal by Land Use Category
Tourist Accom. Units 7,747 698
Public Service 1,723 -431
Recreation 3,053 856
Percent of Total Change by Land Use Category
Tourist Accom. Units 62%
Public Service -38%
Recreation 76%

TOTAL VMT
946
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 25
Chapter 6
Level of Service
Though Level of Service analysis is no longer a requirement under CEQA, the City would like sufficient circulation/LOS analysis to identify potential areas of concern.

LEVEL OF SERVICE
LOS is a quantitative and qualitative measure of traffic conditions on isolated sections of roadway or intersections. LOS ranges from “A” (with no congestion) to “F” (where the system fails with gridlock or stop-and-go conditions prevailing). Detailed LOS definitions are included in Appendix A. As is the standard for traffic engineering analyses, intersection LOS is analyzed based upon the procedures presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (Federal Highways Administration, 2016) using the Synchro software application (Version 10.3, Trafficware). The LOS calculations are contained in Appendix B for further reference.

TRPA LOS Standards
The LOS standards for the Lake Tahoe Basin, established by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), are set forth in the 2019 Regional Transportation Plan with the intent that the Region’s highway system and signalized intersections during peak periods shall not exceed the following:

1. LOS C on rural scenic/recreational roads,

2. LOS D in rural developed areas,

3. LOS D on urban roads, or

4. LOS D for signalized intersections as LOS E may be acceptable during peak periods not to exceed four hours per day.

The Regional Transportation Plan Mobility 2035 (TMPO/TRPA, 2012) also states that: “These vehicle LOS standards may be exceeded when provisions for multimodal amenities and/or services (such as transit, bicycling, and walking facilities) are adequate to provide mobility for users at a level that is proportional to the project-generated traffic in relation to overall traffic conditions on affected roadways” (pp. 2 – 10).

While the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact looks to “reduce the dependency on the private automobile”, there are currently no adopted requirements or standards regarding the quality of service of other travel modes (i.e., transit, biking, or walking) that could potentially reduce the demand on the roadway system. The TRPA does not have a specific adopted standard for unsignalized intersections.

City LOS Standards
Policy TC-1.2 in the South Lake Tahoe General Plan sets forth that the City shall establish a minimum LOS standard of “D” for all City streets and intersections. Up to four hours per day of LOS “E” shall be considered acceptable. LOS shall be considered based on average delay for the intersection as a whole for signalized intersections, and for the worst approach for intersections controlled by stop signs or roundabouts. LOS shall be evaluated for a busy, but not peak, traffic day in the peak seasons. 947
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 26
Existing Year Intersection Level of Service
As shown in Table 12, all study intersections currently attain the LOS thresholds during the existing year condition without the project. With implementation of the proposed project, although average delays would increase slightly the LOS would remain acceptable, with no changes in LOS.

Future Year Intersection Level of Service
As shown in Table 12, all study intersections will attain the LOS thresholds during the future year condition without the project. With implementation of the proposed project, although average delays would increase slightly the LOS would remain acceptable. In summary, the LOS at all study intersections would remain acceptable with the project, with no changes in LOS at existing intersections. Table 12: SLT 56 Acres - Intersection LOS SummaryExisting No Project Existing Plus Project Future No Project Future Plus Project Delay Delay Delay Delay Intersection Control Type (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS US 50/Rufus Allen Signalized D 8.9 A 9.3 A 8.9 A 9.3 A Rufus Allen/Library/Rec Center TWSC D 10.2 B 10.1 B 10.2 B 10.1 B Rufus Allen/Main Street Driveway TWSC D 7.6 A 9.7 A 7.6 A 9.7 A Rufus Allen/Existing Ice Rink Driveway TWSC D 9.3 A 9.1 A 9.3 A 9.1 A Rufus Allen/Old Swim Center Driveway TWSC D 9.0 A 0.0 A 9.0 A 0.0 A US 50/Lyons Ave Signalized D 6.6 A 4.8 A 6.6 A 4.8 A US 50/Tallac Ave/Main Street Signalized D 6.2 A 15.1 B 6.2 A 15.2 B Main Street/Civic Center/Camping TWSC D 8.4 A 10.2 B 8.4 A 10.2 B BOLD text indicates that LOS standard is exceeded. OVF = Overflow. Overflow indicates a delay greater than 200 seconds per vehicle, which cannot be accurately calculated using HCM methodology. TWSC = Two-Way Stop-Control; AWSC = All-Way Stop-Control NOTE 1: Level of service for signalized intersections is reported for the total intersection. NOTE 2: Level of service for roundabouts and other unsignalized intersections is reported for the worst movement. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. LOS Threshold 948
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 27
Chapter 7
Other Transportation Impacts and Conclusions

INTERSECTION QUEUING ANALYSIS
Traffic queues at specific intersections that exceed the storage capacity of turn lanes, or that block turn movements at important nearby intersections or driveways, can cause operational problems beyond those identified in the LOS analysis. The 95th-percentile traffic queue length (the queue length that is only exceeded 5 percent of the time) was reviewed at locations where queuing could potentially cause traffic concerns. Based on this review, no intersection queuing concerns are identified at the study intersections with implementation of the project.

IMPACT ON BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONDITIONS
The proposed Master Plan includes a comprehensive network of multipurpose bicycle/pedestrian facilities within the site. These facilities are located to direct cyclists and walkers to locations along US 50 with traffic signals that have crosswalks (at Tallac Avenue, Lakeview Avenue and Rufus Allen Boulevard).

As a result, cyclists and pedestrians would be provided with protected crossing of US 50.

IMPACT ON TRANSIT SERVICES
The 56 Acres is currently served by TTD Route 50, scheduled to provide serve every 30 minutes 7 days a week. Stops are located along US 50 at Modesto Avenue, San Jose Avenue and Rufus Allen Boulevard.

The proposed project will improve transit accessibility in two ways. First, the new location of the recreation center will place it closer to a transit stop than the current location. Secondly, shifting City Hall from the current location at the airport (which is not currently served by transit) to the 56 Acres will provide transit service to this important public function.

The changes in land uses will overall result in a modest increase in transit ridership. Existing (and prepandemic) capacity on TTD Route 50 is adequate to accommodate the expected increase.

CONCLUSIONS
• The project is forecasted to generate about 15,039 total VMT with completion of the project.

Subtracting out the forecasted existing VMT and the change in land use VMT results in a net increase of 1,123 total VMT considered on a total-trip-length basis. • The project is forecasted to generate a total of approximately 4,458 one-way daily vehicle trips (DVTE) at the site driveways on a weekday, including 390 PM peak-hour vehicle-trips (190 inbound plus 201 outbound). This is a net increase of 1,082 one-way daily vehicle trips from the existing land uses, including an increase of 95 PM peak-hour vehicle-trips (41 inbound plus 54 outbound).
949
56 Acres Master Plan Transportation Analysis
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 28
• The LOS at all study intersections would remain acceptable with the project. • No intersection queuing concerns are identified at the study intersections with implementation of the project.
• No significant impacts regarding transit or bicycle/pedestrian conditions would result from implementation of the project.
950
Appendix A
LOS Descriptions
951

DESCRIPTIONS OF LEVELS OF SERVICE
The concept of level of service is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists and/or passengers. A level of service definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility for which analysis procedures are available. They are given letter designations, from A to F, with level of service A representing the best operating conditions and level of service F the worst.

Level of Service Definitions
In general, the various levels of service are defined as follows for uninterrupted flow facilities:
$ Level of service A represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. Freedom to select desired speeds and to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely high. The general level of comfort and convenience provided to the motorist, passenger, or pedestrian is excellent.
$ Level of service B is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from LOS A. The level of comfort and convenience provided is somewhat less than at LOS A, because the presence of others in the traffic stream begins to affect individual behavior.
$ Level of service C is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. The selection of speed is now affected by the presence of others, and maneuvering within the traffic stream requires substantial vigilance on the part of the user. The general level of comfort and convenience declines noticeably at this level. $ Level of Service D represents high-density, but stable, flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver or pedestrian experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational problems at this level. $ Level of service E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedestrian to “give way” to accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and driver or pedestrian frustration is generally high. Operations at this level are usually unstable, because small increases in flow or minor perturbations within the traffic stream will cause breakdowns. $ Level of service F is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. Operations within the queue are characterized by stop-and-go waves, and they are extremely unstable. Vehicles may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or more, then be required to stop in a cyclic fashion. Level of service F is used to describe the operating conditions within the queue, as well as the point of the breakdown. It should be noted, however, that in many cases operating conditions of vehicles or pedestrians discharged from the queue may be quite good. Nevertheless, it is the point at which arrival flow exceeds discharge flow which causes the queue to form, and level of service F is an appropriate designation for such points. 952
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Rufus Allen Blvd & US 50 08/03/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Existing No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1383 93 73 1183 34 90
Future Volume (veh/h) 1383 93 73 1183 34 90
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1503 101 79 1286 37 98
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1938 130 116 2575 184 164
Arrive On Green 0.57 0.57 0.07 0.72 0.10 0.10
Sat Flow, veh/h 3474 226 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 787 817 79 1286 37 98
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1830 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 17.7 18.0 2.3 8.2 1.0 3.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.7 18.0 2.3 8.2 1.0 3.1
Prop In Lane 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1018 1049 116 2575 184 164
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.78 0.68 0.50 0.20 0.60
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1241 1278 187 3162 665 591
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.5 8.6 23.9 3.1 21.5 22.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 2.6 6.8 0.2 0.5 3.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.3 8.7 1.9 1.3 0.8 2.1
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.0 11.2 30.7 3.3 22.0 25.9
LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1604 1365 135
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 4.8 24.8
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.9 7.9 34.5 42.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 5.5 36.5 46.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 4.3 20.0 10.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 9.9 11.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.9
HCM 6th LOS A
953
HCM 6th TWSC
2: Rufus Allen Blvd & Library Entrance 08/03/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Existing No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 34 8 8 90 135 31
Future Vol, veh/h 34 8 8 90 135 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 37 9 9 98 147 34
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 280 164 181 0 - 0
Stage 1 164 -----
Stage 2 116 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 710 881 1394 - - -
Stage 1 865 -----
Stage 2 909 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 705 881 1394 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 705 -----
Stage 1 859 -----
Stage 2 909 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.2 0.6 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1394 - 733 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.062 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 10.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - -
954
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Rufus Allen Blvd & Camping Driveway 08/03/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Existing No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 13 62 79 64
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 13 62 79 64
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 14 67 86 70
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 216 121 156 0 - 0
Stage 1 121 -----
Stage 2 95 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 772 930 1424 - - -
Stage 1 904 -----
Stage 2 929 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 764 930 1424 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 764 -----
Stage 1 895 -----
Stage 2 929 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1424 ----
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 ----
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 ----
955
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Rufus Allen Blvd & Ice Arena 08/03/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Existing No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 5 4 58 63 15
Future Vol, veh/h 17 5 4 58 63 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 18 5 4 63 68 16
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 147 76 84 0 - 0
Stage 1 76 -----
Stage 2 71 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 845 985 1513 - - -
Stage 1 947 -----
Stage 2 952 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 842 985 1513 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 842 -----
Stage 1 944 -----
Stage 2 952 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 0.5 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1513 - 871 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.027 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
956
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Rufus Allen Blvd & Swim Center 08/03/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Existing No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 14 9 62 52 9
Future Vol, veh/h 11 14 9 62 52 9
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 12 15 10 67 57 10
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 149 62 67 0 - 0
Stage 1 62 -----
Stage 2 87 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 843 1003 1535 - - -
Stage 1 961 -----
Stage 2 936 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 837 1003 1535 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 837 -----
Stage 1 954 -----
Stage 2 936 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9 0.9 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1535 - 922 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.029 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
957
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: US 50 & Lyons Ave 08/03/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Existing No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 69 20 1364 76 21 1280
Future Volume (veh/h) 69 20 1364 76 21 1280
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 22 1483 83 23 1391
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 105 31 2011 112 50 2549
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.08 0.59 0.59 0.03 0.72
Sat Flow, veh/h 1327 389 3516 191 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 98 0 767 799 23 1391
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1734 0 1777 1836 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 0.0 13.9 14.0 0.6 8.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 0.0 13.9 14.0 0.6 8.0
Prop In Lane 0.77 0.22 0.10 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 137 0 1044 1079 50 2549
V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.00 0.73 0.74 0.46 0.55
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 710 0 1338 1383 205 3448
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.9 0.0 6.6 6.7 21.2 2.9
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.7 0.0 1.6 1.6 6.6 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.0 5.2 0.5 0.4
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.6 0.0 8.2 8.2 27.8 3.1
LnGrp LOS C A A A C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 98 1566 1414
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 8.2 3.5
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.7 30.5 36.2 8.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 33.3 42.9 18.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 16.0 10.0 4.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.0 12.7 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.6
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 958
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Tallac Ave. & US 50 08/03/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Existing No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 64 0 62 0 0 0 31 1408 0 0 1274 54 Future Volume (veh/h) 64 0 62 0 0 0 31 1408 0 0 1274 54 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 70 0 67 0 0 0 34 1530 0 0 1385 59
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 271 0 143 161 4 0 335 2538 0 330 2007 85
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 3647 0 1781 3473 148 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 70 0 67 0 0 0 34 1530 0 0 707 737
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1844 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 9.9 0.0 0.0 12.8 12.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 9.9 0.0 0.0 12.8 12.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 271 0 143 161 4 0 335 2538 0 330 1027 1065 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 355 0 625 362 745 0 464 3366 0 524 1683 1747 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.8 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 3.3 0.0 0.0 6.8 6.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln1.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 4.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.3 0.0 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 7.6 7.6 LnGrp LOS C A C AAAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 137 0 1564 1444
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.8 0.0 3.6 7.6
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 37.3 0.0 8.6 6.3 31.0 7.5 1.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 43.5 5.3 18.1 5.1 43.5 5.1 18.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 11.9 0.0 3.8 2.3 14.9 3.8 0.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 11.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.2
HCM 6th LOS A
959
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Camping Driveway 08/03/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Existing No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 26 0 0 15
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 26 0 0 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 28 0 0 16
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 - 1
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - - 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - - 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 0 1084
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - - 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.3 8.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - 0.017 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 7.3 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 -
960
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Rufus Allen Blvd & US 50 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Existing Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1383 82 89 1177 21 103
Future Volume (veh/h) 1383 82 89 1177 21 103
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1503 89 97 1279 23 112
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1953 115 126 2579 196 174
Arrive On Green 0.57 0.57 0.07 0.73 0.11 0.11
Sat Flow, veh/h 3503 201 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 780 812 97 1279 23 112
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1834 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 18.3 18.5 2.9 8.4 0.6 3.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.3 18.5 2.9 8.4 0.6 3.7
Prop In Lane 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1018 1051 126 2579 196 174
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.50 0.12 0.64
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1283 1325 244 3347 635 565
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.9 9.0 25.0 3.2 22.0 23.3
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 2.2 9.6 0.1 0.3 3.9
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.7 9.0 2.6 1.6 0.5 2.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.1 11.2 34.6 3.4 22.2 27.2
LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1592 1376 135
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 5.6 26.4
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 8.4 35.8 44.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 7.5 39.5 51.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.7 4.9 20.5 10.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 10.8 11.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.3
HCM 6th LOS A
961
HCM 6th TWSC
2: Rufus Allen Blvd & Library Entrance 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Existing Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 8 2 74 115 55
Future Vol, veh/h 50 8 2 74 115 55
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 54 9 2 80 125 60
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 239 155 185 0 - 0
Stage 1 155 -----
Stage 2 84 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 749 891 1390 - - -
Stage 1 873 -----
Stage 2 939 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 748 891 1390 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 748 -----
Stage 1 871 -----
Stage 2 939 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 0.2 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1390 - 765 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.082 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 10.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 - -
962
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Rufus Allen Blvd & Main Street 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Existing Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 7 16 25 57 65
Future Vol, veh/h 52 7 16 25 57 65
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 57 8 17 27 62 71
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 159 98 133 0 - 0
Stage 1 98 -----
Stage 2 61 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 832 958 1452 - - -
Stage 1 926 -----
Stage 2 962 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 822 958 1452 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 822 -----
Stage 1 915 -----
Stage 2 962 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.7 2.9 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1452 - 836 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - 0.077 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - -
963
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Rufus Allen Blvd & Ice Arena 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Existing Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 19 23 20 40 24
Future Vol, veh/h 20 19 23 20 40 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 22 21 25 22 43 26
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 128 56 69 0 - 0
Stage 1 56 -----
Stage 2 72 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 866 1011 1532 - - -
Stage 1 967 -----
Stage 2 951 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 1011 1532 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 851 -----
Stage 1 951 -----
Stage 2 951 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 4 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1532 - 922 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - 0.046 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - -
964
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Rufus Allen Blvd & Swim Center 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Existing Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 59 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 59 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 47 64 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 111 64 64 0 - 0
Stage 1 64 -----
Stage 2 47 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 886 1000 1538 - - -
Stage 1 959 -----
Stage 2 975 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 886 1000 1538 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 886 -----
Stage 1 959 -----
Stage 2 975 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1538 ----
HCM Lane V/C Ratio -----
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 ----
965
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: US 50 & Lyons Ave 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Existing Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 13 1423 31 14 1439
Future Volume (veh/h) 23 13 1423 31 14 1439
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 14 1547 34 15 1564
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 47 26 2211 49 34 2651
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.62 0.62 0.02 0.75
Sat Flow, veh/h 1068 598 3649 78 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 0 772 809 15 1564
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1709 0 1777 1856 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 12.5 12.5 0.4 8.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 12.5 12.5 0.4 8.6
Prop In Lane 0.62 0.35 0.04 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 76 0 1105 1154 34 2651
V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.44 0.59
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 721 0 1587 1658 212 3970
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.1 0.0 5.4 5.4 20.8 2.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.6 0.0 0.8 0.8 8.7 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 3.4 3.5 0.4 0.1
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.7 0.0 6.2 6.2 29.5 2.7
LnGrp LOS C A A A C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 40 1581 1579
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.7 6.2 2.9
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.3 31.2 36.5 6.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 38.3 47.9 18.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 14.5 10.6 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 12.1 15.9 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 966
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Tallac Ave./Main Street & US 50 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Existing Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 60 14 55 133 22 6 25 1305 105 2 1265 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 60 14 55 133 22 6 25 1305 105 2 1265 50 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 65 15 60 145 24 7 27 1418 114 2 1375 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 317 25 100 315 154 45 244 1812 145 189 1800 71 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.52 0.52 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 327 1308 1781 1391 406 1781 3332 267 1781 3486 137 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 65 0 75 145 0 31 27 753 779 2 700 729 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1635 1781 0 1797 1781 1777 1822 1781 1777 1846 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 2.8 4.6 0.0 1.0 0.4 20.9 21.2 0.0 19.6 19.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 2.8 4.6 0.0 1.0 0.4 20.9 21.2 0.0 19.6 19.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 317 0 125 315 0 199 244 966 991 189 918 953 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.60 0.46 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.78 0.79 0.01 0.76 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 367 0 475 315 0 534 337 1235 1266 330 1235 1283 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.4 0.0 27.9 23.7 0.0 25.1 9.9 11.3 11.3 10.3 12.0 12.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 4.6 1.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 2.5 2.6 0.0 2.0 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln1.5 0.0 2.2 3.4 0.0 0.7 0.2 10.9 11.2 0.0 10.4 10.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.8 0.0 32.4 24.8 0.0 25.4 10.1 13.8 13.9 10.3 14.0 14.0 LnGrp LOS C A C C A C BBBBBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 140 176 1559 1431
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.9 24.9 13.8 14.0
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4.7 38.4 10.0 9.3 6.4 36.7 7.9 11.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 43.3 5.5 18.1 5.1 43.3 5.1 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 23.2 6.6 4.8 2.4 21.7 4.1 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.1
HCM 6th LOS B
967
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Main Street 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Existing Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 72 46 2 3 71 8 3 0 3 10 0 86
Future Vol, veh/h 72 46 2 3 71 8 3 0 3 10 0 86
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 78 50 2 3 77 9 3 0 3 11 0 93
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 86 0 0 52 0 0 341 299 51 297 296 82 Stage 1 - - - - - - 207 207 - 88 88 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 134 92 - 209 208 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1510 - - 1554 - - 613 613 1017 655 616 978 Stage 1 - - - - - - 795 731 - 920 822 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 869 819 - 793 730 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1510 - - 1554 - - 531 579 1017 626 582 978 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 531 579 - 626 582 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 753 692 - 871 820 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 784 817 - 749 691 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 4.5 0.3 10.2 9.4

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 698 1510 - - 1554 - - 924
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.052 - - 0.002 - - 0.113
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 7.5 0 - 7.3 0 - 9.4
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.4
968
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Rufus Allen Blvd & US 50 08/04/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Future No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1383 93 73 1198 34 90
Future Volume (veh/h) 1383 93 73 1198 34 90
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1503 101 79 1302 37 98
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1938 130 116 2575 184 164
Arrive On Green 0.57 0.57 0.07 0.72 0.10 0.10
Sat Flow, veh/h 3474 226 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 787 817 79 1302 37 98
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1830 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 17.7 18.0 2.3 8.3 1.0 3.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.7 18.0 2.3 8.3 1.0 3.1
Prop In Lane 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1018 1049 116 2575 184 164
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.78 0.68 0.51 0.20 0.60
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1241 1278 187 3162 665 591
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.5 8.6 23.9 3.1 21.5 22.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 2.6 6.8 0.2 0.5 3.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.3 8.7 1.9 1.3 0.8 2.1
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.0 11.2 30.7 3.3 22.0 25.9
LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1604 1381 135
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 4.8 24.8
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.9 7.9 34.5 42.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 5.5 36.5 46.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 4.3 20.0 10.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 9.9 11.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.9
HCM 6th LOS A
969
HCM 6th TWSC
2: Rufus Allen Blvd & Library Entrance 08/04/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Future No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 34 8 8 90 135 31
Future Vol, veh/h 34 8 8 90 135 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 37 9 9 98 147 34
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 280 164 181 0 - 0
Stage 1 164 -----
Stage 2 116 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 710 881 1394 - - -
Stage 1 865 -----
Stage 2 909 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 705 881 1394 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 705 -----
Stage 1 859 -----
Stage 2 909 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.2 0.6 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1394 - 733 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.062 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 10.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - -
970
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Rufus Allen Blvd & Camping Driveway 08/04/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Future No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 13 62 79 64
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 13 62 79 64
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 14 67 86 70
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 216 121 156 0 - 0
Stage 1 121 -----
Stage 2 95 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 772 930 1424 - - -
Stage 1 904 -----
Stage 2 929 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 764 930 1424 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 764 -----
Stage 1 895 -----
Stage 2 929 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1424 ----
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 ----
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 ----
971
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Rufus Allen Blvd & Ice Arena 08/04/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Future No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 5 4 58 63 15
Future Vol, veh/h 17 5 4 58 63 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 18 5 4 63 68 16
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 147 76 84 0 - 0
Stage 1 76 -----
Stage 2 71 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 845 985 1513 - - -
Stage 1 947 -----
Stage 2 952 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 842 985 1513 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 842 -----
Stage 1 944 -----
Stage 2 952 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 0.5 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1513 - 871 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.027 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
972
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Rufus Allen Blvd & Swim Center 08/04/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Future No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 14 9 62 52 9
Future Vol, veh/h 11 14 9 62 52 9
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 12 15 10 67 57 10
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 149 62 67 0 - 0
Stage 1 62 -----
Stage 2 87 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 843 1003 1535 - - -
Stage 1 961 -----
Stage 2 936 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 837 1003 1535 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 837 -----
Stage 1 954 -----
Stage 2 936 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9 0.9 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1535 - 922 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.029 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
973
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: US 50 & Lyons Ave 08/04/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Future No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 69 20 1364 76 21 1307
Future Volume (veh/h) 69 20 1364 76 21 1307
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 22 1483 83 23 1421
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 105 31 2011 112 50 2549
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.08 0.59 0.59 0.03 0.72
Sat Flow, veh/h 1327 389 3516 191 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 98 0 767 799 23 1421
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1734 0 1777 1836 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 0.0 13.9 14.0 0.6 8.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 0.0 13.9 14.0 0.6 8.3
Prop In Lane 0.77 0.22 0.10 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 137 0 1044 1079 50 2549
V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.00 0.73 0.74 0.46 0.56
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 710 0 1338 1383 205 3448
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.9 0.0 6.6 6.7 21.2 2.9
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.7 0.0 1.6 1.6 6.6 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.0 5.2 0.5 0.4
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.6 0.0 8.2 8.2 27.8 3.1
LnGrp LOS C A A A C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 98 1566 1444
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 8.2 3.5
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.7 30.5 36.2 8.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 33.3 42.9 18.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 16.0 10.3 4.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.0 13.0 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.6
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 974
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Tallac Ave. & US 50 08/04/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Future No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 64 0 62 0 0 0 31 1408 0 0 1301 54 Future Volume (veh/h) 64 0 62 0 0 0 31 1408 0 0 1301 54 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 70 0 67 0 0 0 34 1530 0 0 1414 59
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 268 0 141 158 4 0 329 2553 0 330 2030 85
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 3647 0 1781 3476 145 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 70 0 67 0 0 0 34 1530 0 0 721 752
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1844 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 9.9 0.0 0.0 13.3 13.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 9.9 0.0 0.0 13.3 13.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 268 0 141 158 4 0 329 2553 0 330 1037 1077 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 349 0 614 356 733 0 455 3309 0 520 1655 1717 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.2 0.0 20.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 3.3 0.0 0.0 6.8 6.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln1.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 4.9 5.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.7 0.0 22.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 3.5 0.0 0.0 7.7 7.7 LnGrp LOS C A C AAAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 137 0 1564 1473
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.2 0.0 3.5 7.7
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 38.1 0.0 8.7 6.3 31.8 7.5 1.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 43.5 5.3 18.1 5.1 43.5 5.1 18.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 11.9 0.0 3.9 2.3 15.4 3.8 0.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.2
HCM 6th LOS A
975
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Camping Driveway 08/04/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 08/03/2021 Future No Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 26 0 0 15
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 26 0 0 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 28 0 0 16
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 - 1
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - - 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - - 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 0 1084
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - - 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.3 8.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - 0.017 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 7.3 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 -
976
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Rufus Allen Blvd & US 50 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Future Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1383 82 89 1192 21 103
Future Volume (veh/h) 1383 82 89 1192 21 103
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1503 89 97 1296 23 112
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1953 115 126 2579 196 174
Arrive On Green 0.57 0.57 0.07 0.73 0.11 0.11
Sat Flow, veh/h 3503 201 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 780 812 97 1296 23 112
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1834 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 18.3 18.5 2.9 8.6 0.6 3.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.3 18.5 2.9 8.6 0.6 3.7
Prop In Lane 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1018 1051 126 2579 196 174
V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.50 0.12 0.64
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1283 1325 244 3347 635 565
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.9 9.0 25.0 3.2 22.0 23.3
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 2.2 9.6 0.2 0.3 3.9
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.7 9.0 2.6 1.6 0.5 2.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.1 11.2 34.6 3.4 22.2 27.2
LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1592 1393 135
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 5.6 26.4
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 8.4 35.8 44.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 7.5 39.5 51.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.7 4.9 20.5 10.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 10.8 12.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.3
HCM 6th LOS A
977
HCM 6th TWSC
2: Rufus Allen Blvd & Library Entrance 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Future Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 8 2 74 115 55
Future Vol, veh/h 50 8 2 74 115 55
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 54 9 2 80 125 60
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 239 155 185 0 - 0
Stage 1 155 -----
Stage 2 84 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 749 891 1390 - - -
Stage 1 873 -----
Stage 2 939 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 748 891 1390 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 748 -----
Stage 1 871 -----
Stage 2 939 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 0.2 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1390 - 765 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.082 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 10.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 - -
978
HCM 6th TWSC
3: Rufus Allen Blvd & Main Street 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Future Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 7 16 25 57 65
Future Vol, veh/h 52 7 16 25 57 65
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 57 8 17 27 62 71
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 159 98 133 0 - 0
Stage 1 98 -----
Stage 2 61 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 832 958 1452 - - -
Stage 1 926 -----
Stage 2 962 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 822 958 1452 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 822 -----
Stage 1 915 -----
Stage 2 962 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.7 2.9 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1452 - 836 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - 0.077 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - -
979
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Rufus Allen Blvd & Ice Arena 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Future Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 19 23 20 40 24
Future Vol, veh/h 20 19 23 20 40 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 22 21 25 22 43 26
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 128 56 69 0 - 0
Stage 1 56 -----
Stage 2 72 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 866 1011 1532 - - -
Stage 1 967 -----
Stage 2 951 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 1011 1532 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 851 -----
Stage 1 951 -----
Stage 2 951 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 4 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1532 - 922 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - 0.046 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - -
980
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Rufus Allen Blvd & Swim Center 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Future Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 59 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 43 59 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 47 64 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 111 64 64 0 - 0
Stage 1 64 -----
Stage 2 47 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 886 1000 1538 - - -
Stage 1 959 -----
Stage 2 975 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 886 1000 1538 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 886 -----
Stage 1 959 -----
Stage 2 975 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1538 ----
HCM Lane V/C Ratio -----
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 ----
981
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: US 50 & Lyons Ave 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Future Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 13 1423 31 14 1467
Future Volume (veh/h) 23 13 1423 31 14 1467
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 14 1547 34 15 1595
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 47 26 2211 49 34 2651
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.62 0.62 0.02 0.75
Sat Flow, veh/h 1068 598 3649 78 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 0 772 809 15 1595
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1709 0 1777 1856 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 12.5 12.5 0.4 8.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 12.5 12.5 0.4 8.9
Prop In Lane 0.62 0.35 0.04 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 76 0 1105 1154 34 2651
V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.44 0.60
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 721 0 1587 1658 212 3970
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.1 0.0 5.4 5.4 20.8 2.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.6 0.0 0.8 0.8 8.7 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 3.4 3.5 0.4 0.1
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.7 0.0 6.2 6.2 29.5 2.7
LnGrp LOS C A A A C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 40 1581 1610
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.7 6.2 3.0
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.3 31.2 36.5 6.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 38.3 47.9 18.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 14.5 10.9 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 12.1 16.3 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 982
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Tallac Ave./Main Street & US 50 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Future Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 60 14 55 133 22 6 25 1305 105 2 1291 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 60 14 55 133 22 6 25 1305 105 2 1291 50 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 65 15 60 145 24 7 27 1418 114 2 1403 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 316 25 100 313 153 45 239 1819 146 190 1810 70 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.52 0.52 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 327 1308 1781 1391 406 1781 3332 267 1781 3489 134 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 65 0 75 145 0 31 27 753 779 2 713 744 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1635 1781 0 1797 1781 1777 1822 1781 1777 1846 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 2.8 4.6 0.0 1.0 0.4 20.9 21.2 0.0 20.2 20.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 2.8 4.6 0.0 1.0 0.4 20.9 21.2 0.0 20.2 20.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 316 0 125 313 0 198 239 970 995 190 922 958 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.60 0.46 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.78 0.78 0.01 0.77 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 365 0 472 313 0 531 331 1228 1259 330 1228 1276 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 28.0 23.9 0.0 25.3 10.0 11.2 11.3 10.2 12.1 12.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 4.6 1.1 0.0 0.4 0.2 2.5 2.6 0.0 2.2 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln1.6 0.0 2.2 3.5 0.0 0.8 0.2 10.9 11.2 0.0 10.8 11.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.9 0.0 32.6 25.0 0.0 25.6 10.3 13.7 13.8 10.3 14.4 14.4 LnGrp LOS C A C C A C BBBBBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 140 176 1559 1459
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.0 25.1 13.7 14.4
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4.7 38.7 10.0 9.3 6.4 37.0 7.9 11.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 43.3 5.5 18.1 5.1 43.3 5.1 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 23.2 6.6 4.8 2.4 22.3 4.1 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.2
HCM 6th LOS B
983
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Main Street 10/11/2021
SLT 56 Acres Master Plan 10/11/2021 Future Plus Project Synchro 10 Report SMB Page 8
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 72 46 2 3 71 8 3 0 3 10 0 86
Future Vol, veh/h 72 46 2 3 71 8 3 0 3 10 0 86
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 78 50 2 3 77 9 3 0 3 11 0 93
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 86 0 0 52 0 0 341 299 51 297 296 82 Stage 1 - - - - - - 207 207 - 88 88 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 134 92 - 209 208 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1510 - - 1554 - - 613 613 1017 655 616 978 Stage 1 - - - - - - 795 731 - 920 822 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 869 819 - 793 730 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1510 - - 1554 - - 531 579 1017 626 582 978 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 531 579 - 626 582 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 753 692 - 871 820 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 784 817 - 749 691 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 4.5 0.3 10.2 9.4

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 698 1510 - - 1554 - - 924
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.052 - - 0.002 - - 0.113
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 7.5 0 - 7.3 0 - 9.4
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.4
984
Council Agenda Report- January 18, 2022 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: January 18, 2022
Title: Agreement and Ground Lease with El Dorado County for Development, Operation, and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property
Location: 56 Acres Property
Responsible Staff Members: Heather Stroud, City Attorney (530) 542-6046 Joseph Irvin, City Manager (530) 542-6000
Background:

Under the terms of multiple agreements initially executed in 1968 and amended numerous times over the past 54 years, the City of South Lake Tahoe and County of El Dorado have jointly used the property commonly known as the “56 Acres,” which is generally bounded by US 50 to the west, Lake Tahoe to the north, and Rufus Allen Boulevard to the east. The County currently owns approximately 41 acres on which the Library, Campground by the Lake, County vector control operations, Senior Center, Lakeview Commons, and other existing community buildings are located. The City currently owns approximately 15 acres on which some Public Works functions, South Tahoe Ice Arena, and existing Recreation Center are located. The operative 1972 lease of most of the County-owned property to the City is set to expire on July 1, 2023.

On January 14, 2020, the City Council and El Dorado County Board of Supervisors each adopted resolutions setting forth terms for a new agreement between the City and County for the development and use of the 56-Acre Property. On November 3, 2020, the City and County each adopted resolutions extending the timeframe to complete the new agreement until after the 56 Acres Master Plan and CEQA document were complete. The 56 Acres Master Plan and CEQA document are also on this City Council agenda for consideration.

Issue and Discussion:

The new agreement sets forth the terms of a property exchange to accommodate the development of the 56 Acres Master Plan, outlines the expectations for the development and operation of the property, and includes as an attachment the form of a ground lease to be executed after satisfaction of the conditions precedent to closing, including the property exchange.

As set forth in City Council Resolution No. 2020-006 and the companion County resolution, with minor modifications from subsequent negotiations, the new agreement includes the following terms:
 The City retains ownership of approximately 15 acres, to be reconfigured through a property exchange of much of the existing Recreation Center parcel for a new 10.2-acre 985
Council Agenda Report- January 18, 2022 Page 2 of 3
parcel on the north portion of the 56 Acres for the new Multi-Generational Center and future City governmental facilities and a new 1.9-acre parcel to serve as the “main street” through the center of the site. Additionally, the City retains ownership of 4.8 acres of the existing Recreation Center parcel where the South Tahoe Ice Arena is located.  The agreement and lease are for a term of 50 years, with provisions for automatic extensions up to 99 years.
 The new agreement supersedes and consolidates all existing agreements, including Lakeview Commons, into one new agreement.
 The City will develop, operate, and maintain the owned and leased property on the 56 Acres for recreation and government facilities to serve the residents and visitors of the City and County.
 The City has sole authority to determine the desired improvements, and is solely responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance of all existing and new improvements on the 56 Acres, with the following exceptions:
o The County retains ownership and maintenance for the Library and prior Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority building (to be used for the County’s ambulance service provider).

The City will provide snow removal at these sites.
o The County retains ownership and maintenance for the Vector Control facility until it is demolished, remediated, and transferred to the City (within 15 years). o The new Multi-Generational Center shall provide approximately 9,000 square feet for County senior programs, including a commercial kitchen and dining room for the County senior nutrition program, and the County will continue to be responsible for those operating costs. The City and County will share use of this space. o The City will demolish the existing Recreation Center within 15 years and the City and County will meet and confer over construction of a new shared City-County governmental facility.
 The City will construct the new Multi-Generational Center on the northern portion of the 56 Acres to be transferred to the City.
 The City will establish a reserve fund to pay for repairs, replacements, renovations, and upgrades to the property leased from the County. The reserve fund will be made up from the campground fees and 2 percent of the total asset value of all facilities on the 56 Acres, excluding the South Tahoe Ice Arena.
 As rent for property leased from the County, the City will pay the County 50 percent of net operating profits from the entire 56 Acres, excluding the South Tahoe Ice Arena, that remains after the City funds the reserve fund. Net operating profits are calculated as the revenue received by the City from any source for use and rent of the 56-Acre Property, excluding the South Tahoe Ice Arena, minus all City costs to operate, maintain, and 986
Council Agenda Report- January 18, 2022 Page 3 of 3
refurbish such facilities, including all staff costs, operating expenses, and any taxes or assessments paid, excluding campground capital improvement expenses funded by special campground infrastructure fees. If the net operating profits are less than the reserve fund, then neither the City or County are obligated provide additional funds to the reserve fund, and there would be no net operating profits to share.
 As additional rent, starting in the later of year 30 of the new agreement or the full retirement of City-issued debt to finance the construction of the new Multi-Generational Facility, the City will pay the County $200,000 per year, to be adjusted for inflation based on the Consumer Price Index, All Items, West Region.
 The County will reinvest all compensation provided under the agreement into County infrastructure and services in the Tahoe Basin.
 County residents residing outside City limits are eligible to use the existing and new recreational facilities under the same policies and fee schedule as City residents.  The County and City will meet at least annually to review the status of the terms of the agreement, ensure adequate communication, and strengthen the partnership between the two entities.

Financial Implications:

Initially, the City will pay rent to the County equal to 50 percent of net operating profits from the entire 56 Acres, excluding the South Tahoe Ice Arena, that remains after the City funds the reserve fund. Starting in 30 years, or upon retirement of City-issued debt on the MultiGenerational Facility, whichever is later, the City will pay additional rent to the County of $200,000 per year, adjusted annually for inflation.

The construction of the Multi-Generational Facility will be paid for with revenue from Measure P, which voters approved in 2016 to raise the transient occupancy tax by two percent to pay for recreational facilities. The City will pay for the first phase of construction directly with Measure P revenue and will finance the remainder of the construction by issuing bonds backed by Measure P funds.

Environmental Considerations:

The City Council is considering adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 56 Acres Master Plan and South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Aquatics Center Project earlier in this meeting. This Agreement and Ground Lease with the County are within the scope of that Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Policy Implications:

The Agreement and Ground Lease with the County are included in the City Council Strategic Plan 2021-2026 under Goal 1.2 (Mid-Town Revitalization), Action Item 1 (Complete the 56-Acre Master Plan that includes implementation and funding strategies and enter into a lease agreement with El Dorado County).
987
Resolution 2022-XXX January 18, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
January 18, 2022
Authorizing and Directing the Mayor to Execute Agreement and Ground Lease with El Dorado County for Development, Operation, and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property

BACKGROUND
A. The City of South Lake Tahoe owns approximately 15 acres of property (Assessor’s Parcel Number 026-050-004) and El Dorado County owns the other approximately 41 acres of property (APNs 026-050-003, 026-050-005, and 026-050-006) within the area known as the 56-Acres.

B. The City and County currently use the 56-Acres for both City and County facilities, including a public beach, campground, senior center and senior nutrition program, ice arena, library, and vector control facilities.

C. The City and County have entered into various agreements over the last few decades for the City to lease and operate much of the County portion of the 56-Acres, including the Lease of Real Property between the County and City dated December 12, 1972 and various subsequent amendments.

D. The City and County have worked collaboratively to identify future public improvements on the 56-Acres and negotiate terms for a new agreement for the 56-Acres to replace the 1972 Lease, subsequent amendments, and other agreements regarding the use and operation of various facilities on the 56-Acres.

E. The City has prepared a Master Plan for the 56-Acres which includes, among other things, a new Multi-Generational Recreation/Swim/Senior Center Facility.

F. The City and County have agreed to exchange certain real property located on the 56- Acres to effectuate its development and for the County to lease certain property to the City for the City’s ongoing development of the 56-Acres in accordance with the Master Plan.

The subject property is exempt surplus property under the Surplus Lands Act, Government Code section 54220 et seq., and implementing guidelines, as each transferring agency’s property is being exchanged for other property necessary for the transferring agency’s use and is being transferred to another local agency for the transferee’s use.

G. In connection with the consideration of the Master Plan and the new Agreement for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property (“Agreement”) and accompanying Ground Lease and Grant Deeds, the City completed review under the California Environmental Quality Act and prepared a Negative Declaration. The City Council approved the Master Plan and Negative Declaration on January 18, 2022. 988
Resolution 2022-XXX January 18, 2022 Page 2 of 2
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Finds and declares that the subject property the City is transferring to the County in exchange for County property, as set forth in the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, is exempt surplus property under Government Code section 54220 et seq. and the Surplus Land Act Guideline dated April 2021 (“SLA Guidelines”), for the following reasons:
a. Pursuant to SLA Guidelines section 103(b)(3)(C), the City is exchanging property for other property necessary for the City’s use.
b. Pursuant to SLA Guidelines section 103(b)(3)(D), the City is transferring property to another public agency, the County, for the County’s use.

2. Finds that this Agreement is within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Master Plan approved and adopted by City Council on January 18, 2022.

3. Authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute the Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with minor revisions as may be approved by the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney.

4. Authorizes and directs the City Manager and City Attorney to take any other steps necessary to effectuate the terms of the Agreement, including without limitation, execution of the Ground Lease, Grant Deeds and certificates of acceptances attached to the Agreement.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on January 18, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
989
1 AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF THE 56-ACRE PROPERTY

THIS AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE 56-ACRE PROPERTY (“Agreement”) dated as of this _____day of ___________, 2022, the last day of execution (the “Effective Date”), is entered into by and between the CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a municipal corporation (“City”), and EL DORADO COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”). The City and County may each be referred to as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.”

R E C I T A L S
The following Recitals are a substantive part of this Agreement:

A. The City owns approximately 15 acres of property in the City of South Lake Tahoe, also known as Assessor’s Parcel Number 026-050-004 (the “Original City Property”).

The Original City Property is a portion of an overall property known as the 56-Acres. The County owns the other approximately 41 acres of property that make up the 56-Acres, also known as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 026-050-003, 026-050-005, and 026-050-006 (the “Original County Property”). The Original City Property was conveyed to the City by County by Grant Deed dated April 17, 1973, and recorded in the Official Records of El Dorado County on April 23, 1973 (“Grant Deed”). The Grant Deed includes certain terms regarding the City’s use of the Original City Property, including that the property be used for public park, recreation, cultural and visitor services. The Original City Property and the Original County Property may hereinafter be referred to as the “56-Acre Property,” which is depicted in Exhibit A, Site Map, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

B. The City and County currently utilize the 56-Acre Property for both City and County facilities, including a public beach, campground, senior center and senior nutrition program, ice arena, library, and vector control facilities. In addition, the City has leased portions of the 56-Acre Property to community groups and public agencies for visitor, art and emergency medical services purposes.

C. County and City have entered into various agreements over the last few decades to provide for the County’s lease of the entire portion of the Original County Property to City and the construction of various facilities on the County Property. The original Lease of Real Property between the County and City was dated July 1, 1968, and thereafter replaced with a new lease and series of amendments as follows: (1) Lease of Real Property between the County and City dated December 12, 1972; (2) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated December 9, 1986; (3) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated April 14, 1987; (5) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated January 26, 2010; (4) Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of El Dorado and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Construction of the El Dorado Beach Improvement Project in the South Lake Tahoe Recreational Area (“Beach Improvement MOU”);and (5) Amendment 1 to the Beach Improvement MOU dated April 17, 2014 ” (collectively, the “Original 56-Acre Agreements”). In addition, the City and County entered 990
2 into a Facility Use Agreement, dated February 15, 2012 for the County’s use of a portion of the City’s leased property (collectively, the “Existing Use Agreement”).

D. The City has subleased certain portions of the Original County Property pursuant to the following lease agreements: (1) Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the South Lake Chamber of Commerce dated April 4, 2006; and (2) a Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the Tahoe Art League dated May 7, 2012 (“County Property Subleases”). In addition, City has entered into a Sublease Agreement between the California Tahoe Emergency Services Operations Authority, dated February 11, 2020 (“EMS Sublease”).

E. The City and County desire to work collaboratively to maximize the public benefits from the 56-Acre Property, update previous planning efforts and enable the provision of the highest quality recreation and government facilities and services on the 56-Acre Property.

F. The 56-Acre Property is anticipated to become the identifiable recreation and government center of the South Lake Tahoe, with the development of the site as a park-like campus with plentiful recreation facilities, the centralization of City government facilities and services and a “downtown” environment centered on the 56-Acre Property and neighboring Harrison Avenue commercial district.

G. The City and County have worked collaboratively to identify future public improvements on the 56-Acre Property and negotiate terms for a new agreement for the 56-Acre Property to replace the Original 56-Acre Agreements.

H. The California Tahoe Conservancy has provided grant funding for the development of the 56-Acre Property and has expressed support for this Agreement.

I. On January 14, 2020, the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe and the Board of Supervisors of the County of El Dorado adopted similar resolutions, Resolution 2020- 006, and Resolution 007-2020 respectively, Outlining Proposed Terms for a New Agreement between El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of Recreation and Government Facilities on the “56-Acres” (“56-Acre Terms Resolution”).

J. The City has prepared a Master Plan for the 56-Acre Property (“Master Plan”), which includes, among other things, a new Multi-Generational Recreation/Swim/Senior Center Facility (the “New Multi-Generational Center”), a depiction of which is shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

K. City and County have also agreed to exchange certain real property located on the 56-Acre Property to effectuate its development and to lease certain property to City for City’s ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with the Master Plan. The subject property is exempt surplus property under the Surplus Lands Act, Government Code section 54220 et seq., and implementing guidelines as the transferring agency’s property is being exchanged for other property necessary for the transferring agency’s use and is being transferred to another local agency for the transferee’s use.
991
3 L. In connection with consideration of the Master Plan and this Agreement, the City completed review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration.

M. On January 18, 2022, the City Council approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Master Plan.

N. City and County desire to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the 56- Acre Terms Resolution and subsequent negotiations in order to set forth the terms and conditions, among other things relating to (1) the amendment and restatement of the Original 56- Acre Agreements; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City’s ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with the Master Plan; and (4) County’s use of certain portions of the 56- Acre Property.

A G R E E M E N T
NOW, THEREFORE, City and County hereby agree as follows:

1. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES / TERM.

1.1 Representations and Warranties.
(a) City Representations. City represents and warrants to County as follows:
(i) Authority. City is a municipal corporation of the State of California. City has full right, power and lawful authority to perform its obligations hereunder and the execution, performance and delivery of this Agreement by City has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of City.
(ii) No Conflict. City’s execution, delivery and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or a breach under any contract, agreement or order to which City is a party or by which it is bound. (iii) Ownership of Property. City is the owner of the Original City Property.
(iv) No Litigation or Other Proceeding. To City’s current actual knowledge, no litigation or other proceeding (whether administrative or otherwise) is outstanding or has been threatened which would prevent, hinder or delay the ability of City to perform its obligations under this Agreement.

Until the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, City shall, upon learning of any fact or condition which would cause any of the warranties and representations in this Section (a) not to be true, immediately give written Notice of such fact or condition to County.
992
4 (b) County’s Representations. County represents and warrants to City as follows:
(i) Authority. County is a political subdivision of the State of California. County has full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all of its obligations hereunder and the execution, performance and delivery of this Agreement by County has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of County. (ii) No Conflict. County’s execution, delivery and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or a breach under any contract, agreement or order to which County is a party or by which it is bound. (iii) Ownership of Property. County is the owner of the Original County Property.
(iv) No Litigation or Other Proceeding. To County’s current actual knowledge, no litigation or other proceeding (whether administrative or otherwise) is outstanding or has been threatened which would prevent, hinder or delay the ability of County to perform its obligations under this Agreement.

Until the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, County shall, upon learning of any fact or condition which would cause any of the warranties and representations in this Section (b) not to be true, immediately give written Notice of such fact or condition to City.

1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be fifty (50) years from the effective date of the Lease described in Section 3.1 below, unless and until earlier terminated as provided herein (“Initial Term”). The Agreement shall be automatically extended on an annual basis up to a total of ninety-nine (99) years, unless either Party notifies the other Party no later than sixty days prior to the end of the Initial Term, or the then-current term, of a Default (as defined in Section 7.2 below) under this Agreement. If the defaulting Party does not cure the Default as provided herein, the other Party may terminate this Agreement. The Initial Term in addition to any automatic extensions pursuant to this Section 1.2 shall be referred to as the “Term.”

2. PROPERTY EXCHANGE.

2.1 Exchange of Property Interests. City and County have determined that the transfer of the property interests as provided herein will further a governmental purpose by facilitating development of the 56-Acre Property as provided in this Agreement. County will transfer certain real property concurrently with execution of the Lease at the Closing, and City and County will transfer other parcels after certain demolition work is performed, as provided in more detail below.
(a) Concurrently with execution of the Lease, County agrees to transfer to City that approximately 10.2 acres of the Original County Property to be used for the purpose of development and construction of the New Multi-Generational Center, civic center, and parking lot (collectively the “New Multi-Generational Center Site”) and approximately 4.8 acres of the Original County Property to be used as a right-of-way, as shown in Attachment 1 to Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (“City Transfer Property”). In the 993
5 event, all or a portion of the City Transfer Property is not developed within fifteen (15) years of the Effective Date consistent with the Master Plan, City shall transfer title and ownership of that portion of the City Transfer Property not developed as provided herein back to the County and the Lease shall be amended to incorporate such property to the Leased Property. The City Transfer Property shall be conveyed pursuant a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, which provides that title to the City Transfer Property shall revert to the County in the event that City no longer uses the City Transfer Property for public use (“City Transfer Property Grant Deed”).
(b) Concurrently with execution of the Lease, City agrees to transfer to County that approximately 11.45 acres of the Original City Property where the existing Recreation Center, excluding the ice arena, is located, as shown in Attachment 1 to Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (“Existing Recreation Center Site”).

The Existing Recreation Site shall be conveyed to County pursuant to a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, which provides that title to the Existing Recreation Center Site shall revert to the City in the event that County no longer uses the Existing Recreation Center Site for public use (“Existing Recreation Site Grant Deed”). The Existing Recreation Center Site shall also be included in the Leased Property. City shall continue to operate the existing facilities on the Existing Recreation Center Site until completion of the New Multi-Generational Center, at which time City shall, at its sole cost and expense, vacate, abandon, and demolish, including removal of all Hazardous Materials, as defined in Section 5.2(b) below, the existing Recreation Center facility, in accordance with all Governmental Requirements to the satisfaction of the County (“Demolition of Existing Recreation Center Facility”). The Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facility shall be completed within fifteen (15) years of the Effective Date. Upon the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Facility, City shall provide Notice to County. County shall review such Notice and may either accept completion of the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facility or provide Notice to City of such work that remains to be completed.
(c) County agrees to transfer to City that approximately one acre of the Original County Property that is currently being used for a vector control facility (“Vector Control Facility”), as shown in Attachment 1 to Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (“Vector Control Property”) within thirty (30) days of City’s acceptance of the Demolition of the Vector Control Facility, as defined in Section 5.2(b). The Vector Control Property shall be conveyed pursuant a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E, which provides that title to the Vector Control Property shall revert to the County in the event that City no longer uses the Vector Control Property for public use (“Vector Control Grant Deed”). Upon transfer of the Vector Control Property to City, the Vector Control Property shall be the sole responsibility of City.

2.2 As-Is Transfer. City and County specifically acknowledge that the City Transfer Property, the Existing Recreational Center Site and the Vector Control Property (collectively, the “Transfer Properties”) being exchanged pursuant to the terms of this Agreement are being accepted by the transferee agency on an “AS IS WITH ALL FAULTS” basis and that neither party is relying on any representations or warranties of any kind whatsoever, expressed or implied, from the other as to any matters concerning the properties, including without limitation:
their physical condition; geology; the development potential of the properties and their use, 994
6 habitability, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose; their zoning or other legal status; compliance with law; the presence or removal of hazardous or toxic materials, substances, or wastes on, under or about the properties or any neighboring property.

2.3 Amendment to Grant Deed. In order to provide consistent restrictions among the various property deeds on the 56-Acre Property and remove restrictions that are no longer applicable, the Parties shall amend a prior Grant from County to City to modify the restrictive covenants. The Amendment to Grant Deed shall be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G (“Amendment to Grant Deed”).

2.4 Covenants. Prior to the transfer of the City Transfer Property and Vector Control Property, as applicable, County will not enter into any contract or lease or convey any real property interest, including easements, affecting the City Transfer Property or the Vector Control Property, as applicable, without City’s written consent. Prior to the transfer of the Existing Recreation Center Site, City will not enter into any contract or lease or convey any real property interest, including easements, affecting the Existing Recreation Center Site, without County’s written consent.

3. LEASE OF CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE COUNTY PROPERTY.

3.1 Lease. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, County shall lease to City and City shall ground lease from County the Leased Property, as defined below. The ground lease for the Property shall be in the form of the Ground Lease attached hereto as Exhibit F, subject to such minor revisions as may be approved by City and County (the “Lease”). City acknowledges and agrees that the Leased Property shall be used for purposes of development of governmental, recreation and community facilities to serve the community, with primary emphasis on recreation, as set forth in more detail in the Lease. Further, the Parties acknowledge that all structures and improvements on the Leased Property as of the date of the Lease are and shall be the sole property of the City and the City shall be responsible for all maintenance costs, as set forth in more detail in the Lease.

3.2 Leased Property. Prior to the Closing, the City and County shall process changes to the boundaries of the Original City Property and the Original County Property in order for the property lines to more accurately align with existing and planned facilities and structures, as shown on the Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Original County Property, as modified herein shall be referred to as the “Leased Property.” The Original City Property, as modified herein shall be referred to as the “City Property.” (a) The City shall process a lot-line adjustment to modify the boundaries of the Original City Property and the Original County Property and adjust the lot-line so no structure is located on the lot line.
(b) The City shall process a Parcel Map to create a separate parcel for the real property on which the El Dorado County Library facility is located (“County Library Property”) and the parties acknowledge that the real property subject to the EMS Sublease (“EMS Property”) is excluded from the Leased Property. Both the County Library Property and the EMS Property shall be retained by County and shall not be included in the Leased 995
7 Property or subject to the terms of the Lease. City covenants that, as of the Effective Date, the City has completed lead, mold, and asbestos remediation and roof replacement on the EMS Property, and the County’s ambulance service provider has initiated a major renovation project on the EMS Property, such that the City is not aware of outstanding maintenance or repair issues associated with the EMS Property. Prior to the Closing, City and County shall negotiate the termination of the existing EMS Sublease in order for County to have direct control and authority for the EMS Property and its use. City shall continue to be responsible for snow removal on the EMS Property and will assist with securing land coverage for the ambulance housing project as required by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, including but not limited to the transfer of not less than 50 square feet of City held land coverage for the project. Upon completion of the New Multi-Generational Center, the City shall be responsible for snow removal on County Library Property, which obligation shall be documented in the use agreement between the City and County for the New Multi-Generational Center as provided in Section

5.3(b) below.

3.3 Lease Rent Payments. Payments of rent for the Leased Property shall be as provided in the Lease, which provides for City to pay: (a) 50 percent (50%) of net operating profits from all existing and future revenue sources generated in the 56-Acre Property, excluding the ice arena, after the City sets aside fees from the campground on the 56-Acre Property and two percent (2%) of the total asset value of the facilities on the 56-Acre Property into a repair and replacement funds to be managed by the City; and (b) an amount equal to $200,000 (increased annually from the Effective Date) in year 30 of the Lease or retirement of debt for the New Multi-Generational Center, all as set forth in more detail in the Lease (the “Lease Rent”).

As set forth in the Lease, County agrees to use all Lease Rent received for County infrastructure initiatives and services in the Tahoe Basin area of El Dorado County, including, but not limited to, roads, trails, facilities, and utilities.

3.4 County Property Subleases. The existing County Property Subleases shall remain in full force and effect under this Agreement and the Lease, as set forth in more detail therein. City shall also have authority to enter into further subleases consistent with the terms of the Lease.

3.5 Extension of County Lease Agreements. The County Lease Agreements are hereby extended and remain in full force and effect until the date the Lease is fully executed and effective.

3.6 Termination of Original 56-Acre Agreements. Upon full execution of the Lease, the Original 56-Acre Agreements shall be terminated and of no further force and effect.

4. CLOSING.

4.1 Title Review. Each Party may request title reports for the various parcels that comprise the 56-Acre Property and may work with a title company, at its sole cost and expense, to purchase title insurance for any property being accepted by such party prior to acceptance. In the event there are any exceptions on title to any property required to be transferred herein that impact the transferee’s ability to develop the property consistent with the terms of this Agreement, the Parties shall coordinate to remove such title exceptions prior to transfer. 996
8 4.2 Execution and Recordation of Lease, City Transfer Grant Deed and Amendment to Grant Deed. Within five business days of the satisfaction of the City and County Conditions Precedent to Closing, the City and County shall execute the Lease and the Amendment to Grant Deed and shall have the Lease or a Memorandum of Lease recorded against the Leased Property and the Amended Grant Deed recorded (“Closing”).

4.3 City’s Conditions Precedent to Closing. City’s obligation to proceed with the Lease is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by City of each and all of the conditions precedent described below (“City Conditions Precedent to Closing”). City’s Conditions Precedent to Lease are solely for the benefit of City and shall be fulfilled or waived within the time periods provided for herein:
(a) No Default. County shall not be in Default under this Agreement and no event shall have occurred which with the passage of time or giving of notice or both would constitute a default hereunder.
(b) Leased Property. City and County shall have adjusted the property lines of the Original City Property and the Original County Property as provided in Section 3.2. (c) Lease. County shall have executed the Lease in the form attached as Exhibit F.
(d) Grant Deeds. County shall have executed the City Transfer Property Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit C.
(e) Amendment to Grant Deed. County shall have executed the Amendment to Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit G. (f) CEQA. No legal challenge has been filed under CEQA within the applicable time period.

4.4 County’s Conditions Precedent to Closing. County’s obligation to proceed with the Lease is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by County of each and all of the conditions precedent described below (“County Conditions Precedent to Closing”), which are solely for the benefit of County, and which shall be fulfilled or waived within the time periods provided for herein:
(a) No Default by City. City shall not be in Default under this Agreement, and no event shall have occurred which with the passage of time or giving of notice or both would constitute a default hereunder.
(b) Leased Property. City and County shall have adjusted the property lines of the Original City Property and the Original County Property as provided in Section 3.2. (c) Lease. City shall have executed the Lease in the form attached as Exhibit F.
997
9 (d) Grant Deed. City shall have executed a Certificate of Acceptance to the City Transfer Property Grant Deed.
(e) Amendment to Grant Deed. City shall have executed the Amendment to Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit G.
(f) CEQA. No legal challenge has been filed under CEQA within the applicable time period.

5. DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE 56-ACRES.

5.1 City Development. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, City shall have the sole authority over the development, operation and use of the 56-Acre Property, including without limitation, the Leased Property, and may determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, the type and nature of any and all improvements to be located on the 56-Acre Property, subject to the use requirements set forth in Section 6.1 below. The City authority described herein shall include the sole responsibility for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of all existing and new improvements on the 56-Acre Property, subject to the exceptions set forth in Section 5.2 below. County and City staff will work cooperatively in the development, construction, operation and maintenance of the 56-Acre Property.

5.2 Exceptions to City Authority and Responsibility. The following are the only exceptions to the City’s sole authority and responsibility over the 56-Acre Property:
(a) County shall retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the EMS Property and the County Library Property, which is not included in the Leased Property and shall not be subject to the terms of the Lease, and all improvements and facilities located thereon.
(b) County shall vacate, abandon, and demolish, including removal of all Hazardous Materials, as defined below, the Vector Control Facility, in accordance with all Governmental Requirements to the satisfaction of the City (“Demolition of Vector Control Facility”). The Demolition of the Vector Control Facility shall be completed no later than fifteen (15) years after the Effective Date. Demolition of the Vector Control Facility is expressly contingent upon finding approximately one (1) acre of improved City-owned real property that County determines, in its reasonable discretion, is a suitable site for a new vector control facility (“New Vector Control Site”), which shall be transferred by City to County at no cost with full coverage credits. In the event that City and County have not agreed upon the New Vector Control Site within thirteen (13) years of the Effective Date, City and County shall meet and confer to ensure that an agreement is reached as to a reasonable site within the 15-year timeframe set forth herein. Upon the Demolition of the Vector Control Facility, County shall provide Notice to City. City shall review such Notice and may either accept completion of the Demolition of the Vector Control or provide Notice to County of such work that remains to be completed. The Vector Control Property shall be transferred to City as provided in Section

2.1(c). “Hazardous Materials” means any substance, material, or waste which is or becomes regulated by any local governmental authority, the State of California, or the United States Government, including any material or substance which is: (i) defined as a “hazardous waste,” 998
10 “extremely hazardous waste,” or “restricted hazardous waste” under Sections 25115, 25117 or 25122.7, or listed pursuant to Section 25140 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5 (Hazardous Waste Control Law); (ii) defined as a “hazardous substance” under Section 25316 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.8 (Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act); (iii) defined as a “hazardous material,” “hazardous substance,” or “hazardous waste” under Section 25501 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95 (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory); (iv) defined as a “hazardous substance” under Section 25281 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.7 (Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances); (v) petroleum; (vi) friable asbestos; (vii) polychlorinated biphenyls; (viii) listed under Article 9 or defined as “hazardous” or “extremely hazardous” pursuant to Article 11 of Title 22 of the California Administrative Code, Division 4, Chapter 20; (ix) designated as “hazardous substances” pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1317); (x) defined as a “hazardous waste” pursuant to Section 1004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §6901, et seq. (42 U.S.C. §6903); or (xi) defined as “hazardous substances” pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §9601, et seq., as the foregoing statutes and regulations now exist or may hereafter be amended.
(c) Each Party shall be responsible for any and all costs associated with environmental remediation or Hazardous Materials on the real property, facilities or structures on the 56-Acre Property that it owns as of the Effective Date. Each Party shall be responsible for conducting Phase 1 investigations and testing upon undertaking any project on its real property. (d) City shall provide a location for the County’s senior nutrition programs in existing or new City facilities located on the 56-Acre Property pursuant to the terms of a use agreement to be entered into between the Parties. County’s programs and the operating costs associated with the programs shall be the sole responsibility of County.

5.3 Multi-Generational Center. The City shall endeavor to construct the New Multi-Generational Center on the 56-Acre Property as described in the Master Plan, subject to the following requirements:
(a) City shall be responsible for all design and construction costs associated with the New Multi-Generational Center and shall own and operate the New Multi-Generational Center.
(b) The City shall allocate approximately 9,000 square feet of space in the New Multi-Generational Center for the purpose of providing older adult services and programs.

The space shall include a commercial kitchen and dining room for the purpose of accommodating the County Senior Nutrition Program and allowing shared use with the City.

County’s use shall be documented in a separate use agreement between the Parties. The use agreement shall also include provisions providing for City’s obligation to be responsible for snow removal on County Library Property upon completion of the New Multi-Generational Center. The City shall manage the space in order to maximize the use of all elements in the New Multi-Generational Center for programs that benefit all user groups in the community. As part of the annual review set forth in Section 7.1 below, the Parties shall discuss programs and 999
11 priorities of use in the New Multi-Generational Center, including City’s commitment to serving seniors in the New Multi-Generational Center and allocation of staff or resources dedicated to older adult services and programs coordination.
(c) City shall be responsible for all Maintenance Costs, as defined below, associated with the New Multi-Generational Center and County shall be responsible for the Operating Costs, as defined below, of its programs and use of the New Multi-Generational Center. City and County shall share the Replacement Costs, as defined below, based on each Party’s proportionate use of the facilities. The cost allocations provided herein shall be documented in the County and City use agreement described in Section 5.3(b) above. (i) “Operating Costs” shall include costs to operate the County senior nutrition programs, including staff costs, costs to fund all programming, and cleaning of the commercial kitchen and dining room after County use.
(ii) “Maintenance Costs” shall include costs to maintain the building, parking area, hardscape, sidewalks, landscaping, and any equipment attached to the building whose removal would do harm to the structure, such as the foundation, roof, ventilation, plumbing, electrical, fire suppression, heating, and windows. (iii) “Replacement Costs” shall include replacement of any equipment or appliances in the commercial kitchen and dining facilities. (d) The existing Senior Center facility shall remain in operation until the completion of the New Multi-Generational Center. Upon completion of the New MultiGenerational Center, County, at its option, may elect to continue providing older adult services program at the existing Senior Center facility pursuant to the terms of the Lease.

5.4 Development of Existing Recreation Center Site. Upon completion of the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facility, either Party may request that this Agreement be re-opened for good faith negotiations between the Parties to address redevelopment and re-use of the Existing Recreation Center Site. The Parties agree and acknowledge that it is anticipated the Existing Recreation Center Site will be developed as a government facility for shared use between County and City.

5.5 Historical Structures. In a manner consistent with the Master Plan, the City shall endeavor to adequately preserve all historically-significant buildings currently located on the 56-Acre Property and to locate and design any new recreational or government facilities in a manner that is complementary to the historically-significant buildings as identified in the Master Plan.

5.6 City Leases. The City shall have sole discretion over leases of the City Property, including without limitation, the extension or termination of such leases, provided however that any and all leases between the City and a third party shall be in compliance with the general use guidelines set forth in this Agreement. With respect to the Leased Property, City shall have the right to maintain any subleases in effect as of the Effective Date and to sublease the Leased Property to any other government entity or local community non-profit. Any other subleases of the Leased Property require County’s prior approval.
1000
12 5.7 Compliance with Laws; Indemnity and Waiver. Both City and County shall carry out all work and development under this Agreement, including County’s demolition of the Vector Control Facility and City’s development on the 56-Acre Property, in conformity with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, codes, rules, regulations, orders and decrees, of the United States, the State of California, the County of El Dorado, the City, and of any other political subdivision or instrumentality exercising jurisdiction over the 56-Acre Property (collectively, the “Governmental Requirements”), including all state labor laws and standards; the County zoning and development standards; building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical codes; all other provisions of the City Municipal Code; and all applicable disabled and handicapped access requirements, including the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq., Government Code Section 4450, et seq., Government Code Section 11135, et seq., and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code Section 51, et seq. Each Party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Party and its officers, employees, volunteers, agents and representatives from and against any and all present and future liabilities, obligations, orders, claims, damages, fines, penalties and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs, arising out of or in any way connected with the first Party’s failure to comply with all Governmental Requirements.

6. USE REQUIREMENTS.

6.1 Governmental Community Use. The City shall develop, operate and maintain the 56-Acre Property, except as set forth in Section 5.2 above, for recreation and government facilities, with primary emphasis on recreation, to serve the residents and visitors of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. In the event City desires to use the 56-Acre Property for any use other than set forth in this Section 6.1, City may submit a written request for a use exception to the County. County shall consider such request in its reasonable discretion and respond in writing to City within 30 days of receipt of the request.

6.2 County Resident Use. The City shall allow residents of El Dorado County that do not reside within the City limits to use existing and new recreation facilities on the 56-Acre Property under the same policies and fee schedule applicable to City residents.

7. ANNUAL REVIEW, DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES.

7.1 Annual Review. The Parties shall meet at least once a year prior to the anniversary date of the Effective Date to review the status of the terms of the Agreement and to ensure adequate communication and strengthen the relationship between the Parties. Prior to the annual meeting date, each Party shall submit to the other Party an update on its compliance with the terms and obligations of this Agreement.

7.2 Default Remedies. Failure by either Party to perform any action or covenant required by this Agreement within the time periods provided herein following Notice shall constitute a “Default” under this Agreement. A Party claiming a Default shall give written Notice of Default to the other Party specifying the Default complained of. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, the claimant shall not institute any proceeding against the other Party if such Party within 60 days following receipt of such Notice of Default immediately, with due diligence, commences to cure, correct or remedy such failure or delay and completes such cure, correction or remedy with diligence
1001
13 7.3 Dispute Resolution. In the event that the Party receiving a Notice of Default disputes the allegations or is not intending to cure, correct or remedy the alleged default, the Parties shall promptly meet in an effort to resolve the issues raised. If the Parties fail to resolve the issues raised, mediation may be pursued by mutual agreement. It is the intent of the Parties to the extent possible that litigation be avoided as a method of dispute resolution.

7.4 Institution of Legal Actions. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, upon the occurrence of a Default, the Parties have the right, in addition to any other rights or remedies, to institute any action at law or in equity to cure, correct, prevent or remedy any Default, or to recover damages for any Default, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. The Parties remedies in the event of a Default shall be limited to obtaining specific performance or injunctive relief. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of El Dorado, State of California, or in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of the State of California. Neither Party shall have the right to recover any consequential, punitive or special damages.

7.5 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual consent of the Parties or upon satisfaction of all terms and obligations set forth herein and not otherwise addressed in the Lease or the Amended Grant Deed.

7.6 Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party, except as otherwise expressly provided herein.

7.7 Inaction Not a Waiver of Default. Any failures or delays by either Party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any Default shall not operate as a waiver of any Default or of any such rights or remedies, or deprive either such Party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies.

8. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

8.1 No Assignment. The qualifications and identity of the Parties are of particular concern and material considerations for entering into this Agreement. Neither Party shall have the right during the Term to assign all or any portion of its rights, obligations or interests under this Agreement.

8.2 Mutual Indemnity.
(a) County shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to City), protect and hold City and its officers, employees, agents and representatives, harmless from any and all liabilities, obligations, orders, claims, damages, fines, penalties and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs (“Claims”) to the extent caused by any of County’s activities under this Agreement or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by County and whether such Claims shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement.
1002
14 (b) City shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to County), protect and hold County and its officers, employees, agents and representatives, harmless from any and all Claims to the extent caused by any of City’s activities under this Agreement or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by City and whether such Claims shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement.

8.3 Notices, Demands and Communications between the Parties. Any approval, disapproval, demand, document or other notice (“Notice”) which either Party may desire to give to the other Party under this Agreement must be in writing and shall be given by certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid, personal delivery, or reputable overnight courier (but not by facsimile or email), to the Party to whom the Notice is directed at the address of the Party as set forth below, or at any other address as that Party may later designate by Notice.

To City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager
To County: El Dorado County
Chief Administrative Office
330 Fair Lane
Placerville, CA 95667
Don Ashton, County Chief Administrative Officer
Any Notice shall be deemed received on the date of delivery if delivered by personal service, on the date of delivery or refused delivery as shown by the return receipt if sent by certified mail, and on the date of delivery or refused delivery as shown by the records of the overnight courier if sent via nationally recognized overnight courier. Notices sent by a Party’s attorney on behalf of such Party shall be deemed delivered by such Party.

8.4 Enforced Delay; Extension of Times of Performance. Subject to the limitations set forth below, performance by either Party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in Default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where delays are due to: war; insurrection; strikes; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; governmental restrictions or priority; litigation, including court delays; or unusually severe weather; acts or omissions of the other Party. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if Notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other Party within 30 days of the commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of City and County.

8.5 Relationship between City and County. It is hereby acknowledged that the relationship between City and County is not that of a joint venture and that City and County shall not be deemed or construed for any purpose to be the agent of the other. 1003
15 8.6 Approvals and Actions. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by either Party, the City Manager of City or County Chief Administrative Officer of County, as applicable, or his or her designee is authorized to act on behalf of such Party, unless specifically provided otherwise or the context requires otherwise.

8.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

8.8 Integration. This Agreement, including the exhibits hereto, contain the entire understanding between the Parties relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

Each Party is entering this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each Party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such Party deems material.

8.9 Titles and Captions. Titles and captions are for convenience of reference only and do not define, describe or limit the scope or the intent of this Agreement or of any of its terms. References to section numbers are to sections in this Agreement, unless expressly stated otherwise. References to specific section numbers shall include all subsections which follow the referenced section.

8.10 Interpretation. As used in this Agreement, masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others where and when the context so dictates. The words “include” and “including” shall be construed as if followed by the words “without limitation.” The Parties acknowledge that each Party and his, her or its counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and that the rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any document executed and delivered by either Party in connection with this Agreement.

8.11 Modifications. Any alteration, change or modification of or to this Agreement, in order to become effective, shall be made in writing and in each instance signed on behalf of each Party.

8.12 Severability. If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this Agreement or its application to any Party or circumstances shall be held, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term, provision, condition or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

8.13 Computation of Time. The time in which any act is to be done under this Agreement is computed by excluding the first day, and including the last day, unless the last day is a holiday or Saturday or Sunday, and then that day is also excluded. The term “holiday” shall mean all holidays as specified in Sections 6700 and 6701 of the California Government Code. If any act is to be done by a particular time during a day, that time shall be Pacific Time Zone time.

8.14 Legal Advice. Each Party represents and warrants to the other the following:
they have carefully read this Agreement, and in signing this Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from 1004
16 their respective legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement; and, they have freely signed this Agreement without any reliance upon any agreement, promise, statement or representation by or on behalf of the other Party, or their respective agents, employees, or attorneys, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement.

8.15 Time of Essence. Time is expressly made of the essence with respect to the performance by City and County of each and every obligation and condition of this Agreement.

8.16 Mutual Cooperation. Each Party agrees to cooperate with the other to implement the terms and conditions of this Agreement and, in that regard, shall execute any and all documents which may be reasonably necessary, helpful, or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement.

8.17 Conflicts of Interest. No member, official or employee of County or City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is directly or indirectly interested.

8.18 Non-liability of Officials and Employees. No member, official or employee of either Party shall be personally liable to the other Party, in the event of any Default, breach or for any amount which may become due, or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.

Each Party hereby waives and releases any claim it may have against the members, officials or employees of the other Party with respect to any Default, breach or for any amount which may become due under the terms of this Agreement.

8.19 Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws principles, shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement.

6.20 Contract Administrators. The County officer or employee with responsibility for administration of this Agreement is Don Ashton, Chief Administrative Officer, or successor.

The City officer or employee for responsibility for administration of this Lease is Joe Irvin, City Manager, or successor.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
1005
17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a
municipal corporation
By:

Mayor
COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:

Chair, Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:

Deputy Clerk
1006
County
Library
APN 26-050-05
County Of El Dorado
APN 26-050-04
City of South Lake
Tahoe
APN 26-050-03
County of El
Dorado
Vector Control
Campground By the Lake
Lakeview Commons
Library
Parking
City Maintenance Yard
South Tahoe Ice Arena
Museum Art League
Senior Center
Recreation Center/Swim Complex
EMS Property
APN 26-050-05
County Of El
Dorado
APN 26-050-05
County Of El
Dorado
APN 26-050-04
City of South Lake
Tahoe
Fire Training
Facility

EXHIBIT A

SITE MAP

EXHIBIT B

MASTER PLAN

CAMPING
(TENT & RV)

CIVIC CENTER
MULTIGENERATIONAL

AQUATICS &

RECREATION
CENTER
HIGHWAY 50
HIGHWAY 50

HARRISON AVE

TALLAC AVE
RUFUS ALLEN BLVD..

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD.

TRANSIT
STOP

LAKEVIEW COMMONS

EXTENSION

TRANSIT
STOP

EXISTING SENIOR
CENTER
CABINS

PLAYGROUND
MUSEUM

ART CENTER

LAKEVIEW AVE

LIBRARY

LAKEVIEW

COMMONS

EXPANDED
CHAMPION’S
PLAZA

FLEXIBLE

EVENT SPACE

FITNESS
PLAY

NATURE &

ADVENTURE
PLAY

CAMPING
CABINS
“MAIN
STREET”

ICE ARENA

REPURPOSED
BLDG..

CULTURAL
HUB

LAKE TAHOE
0 ft 100 200
North
1008
Exhibit C-1

EXHIBIT C

CITY TRANSFER PROPERTY GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joe Irvin, City Manager
Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

NO TAX DUE

GRANT DEED
(EL DORADO COUNTY TO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE)
WHEREAS, the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and El Dorado County, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”) have entered into that certain Agreement for Development, Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated to set forth the terms and conditions relating to among other things (1) the amendment and restatement of a series of prior agreements regarding the lease and development of certain real property located within the County and City referred to as the 56-Acre Property; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property to effectuate development of the 56-Acre Property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City’s ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with a City-approved Master Plan; and (4) County’s use of certain portions of the 56-Acre Property (the “56-Acre Agreement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 56-Acre Agreement, County has agreed to transfer to City an approximately 10.2-acre site for the purpose of development and construction of a new MultiGenerational Center, civic center, and parking lot, and an approximately 4.8 acre site to be used as a right-of-way, in exchange for the City’s grant to County of an approximately 11.45 acre site for County governmental or recreational use.

NOW THEREFORE, the County does hereby grant to City, any and all right, title and interest in the real property located in the County of El Dorado, designated as APN and more particularly described in Attachment 1 attached hereto (“Property”) for public use. The Property shall be used for public use. Private residential, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided, however, that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall be permitted. In the event the Property is not 1009
Exhibit C-2
used for public use as provided herein, title and interest to the Property shall revert to the County.

Executed this day of , 202 .

COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:
1010
Exhibit C-3

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF )
On , before me, Date Name And Title Of Officer (e.g.
“Jane Doe, Notary Public”)
personally appeared Name of Signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public
1011
Exhibit C-4

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated _______________, from the County of El Dorado to the City of South Lake Tahoe (“City”) is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. , adopted by the City Council on , and the grantee consents to the recordation of the Grant Deed on behalf of the City.

Dated: ______________
CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a
municipal corporation
By:
1012
Exhibit C-5

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public
1013
Exhibit C-6
ATTACHMENT 1

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
[to be inserted]
1014
Exhibit D-1

EXHIBIT D

EXISTING RECREATION SITE GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

El Dorado County
Attention:

Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

NO TAX DUE

GRANT DEED
(CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE TO EL DORADO COUNTY)
WHEREAS, the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and El Dorado County, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”) have entered into that certain Agreement for Development, Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated to set forth the terms and conditions relating to among other things (1) the amendment and restatement of a series of prior agreements regarding the lease and development of certain real property located within the County and City referred to as the 56-Acre Property; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property to effectuate development of the 56-Acre Property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City’s ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with a City-approved Master Plan; and (4) County’s use of certain portions of the 56-Acre Property (the “56-Acre Agreement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 56-Acre Agreement, City has agreed to grant to County an approximately 11.45 acre site for County governmental or recreational use, in exchange for County’s grant to City of an approximately 10.2-acre site for the purpose of development and construction of a new Multi-Generational Center, civic center, and parking lot, and an approximately 4.8 acre site to be used as a right-of-way.

NOW THEREFORE, the City does hereby grant to the County, any and all right, title and interest in the real property located in El Dorado County, designated as APN and more particularly described in Attachment 1 attached hereto. The Property shall be used for public use. Private residential, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided, however, that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall be permitted. In the event the Property is not used for public use as provided herein, title and interest to the Property shall revert to the City.
1015
Exhibit D-2
Executed this day of , 202 .

CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a
municipal corporation
By:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
1016
Exhibit D-3

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public
1017
Exhibit D-4

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated _______________, from the City of South Lake Tahoe (“City”) to El Dorado County (“County”), a political subdivision of the State of California, is hereby accepted by order of the County Board of Supervisors on , and the grantee consents to the recordation of the Grant Deed by its duly authorized officer on behalf of the County.

Dated: ______________
COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:

Chair, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:

Deputy Clerk
1018
Exhibit D-5

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF )
On , before me, Date Name And Title Of Officer (e.g.
“Jane Doe, Notary Public”)
personally appeared
Name of Signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public
1019
Exhibit D-6
ATTACHMENT 1

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
[to be inserted]
1020
Exhibit E-7

EXHIBIT E

FORM OF VECTOR CONTROL PROPERTY GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joe Irvin, City Manager
Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

NO TAX DUE

NOW THEREFORE, the County does hereby grant to City, any and all right, title and interest in the real property located in the County of El Dorado, designated as APN and more particularly described in Attachment 1 attached hereto (“Property”) for public use. The Property shall be used for public use. Private residential, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided, however, that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall be permitted. In the event the Property is not used for public use as provided herein, title and interest to the Property shall revert to the County.
1021
Exhibit E-8
Executed this day of , 202 .

COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:

Chair, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:

Deputy ClerkALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR

CALIFORNIA
1022
Exhibit E-9

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public
1023
Exhibit E-10

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated _______________, 202 , from the County of El Dorado to the City of South Lake Tahoe (“City”) is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. , adopted by the City Council on , and the grantee consents to the recordation of the Grant Deed on behalf of the City.

Dated: ______________, 202
CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a
municipal corporation
By:
1024
Exhibit E-11

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public
1025
Exhibit E-12
ATTACHMENT 1

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
[to be inserted]
1026
Exhibit F-1

EXHIBIT F

FORM OF LEASE

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joe Irvin, City Manager
Exempt from Recording Fees
Per Government Code Section 27383
Space above this line for Recorder’s use only.

GROUND LEASE
This GROUND LEASE (the “Lease”), dated as of _______ (“Effective Date”), is made and entered into by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and El Dorado County, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”). County and City may each be referred to as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. County and City have entered into various agreements over the last few decades to provide for the County’s lease to City of certain property on a portion of the site known as the 56-Acre Property and the construction of various facilities on the leased property. The original Lease of Real Property between the County and City was dated July 1, 1968, and thereafter replaced with a new lease and series of amendments as follows: (1) Lease of Real Property between the County and City dated December 12, 1972; (2) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated December 9, 1986; (3) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated April 14, 1987; (5) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated January 26, 2010; (4) Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of El Dorado and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Construction of the El Dorado Beach Improvement Project in the South Lake Tahoe Recreational Area(“Beach Improvement MOU”);and (5) Amendment 1 to the Beach Improvement MOU dated April 17, 2014 ” (collectively, the “Original 56-Acre Agreements”). In addition, the City and County entered into a Facility Use Agreement, dated February 15, 2012 for the County’s use of a portion of the City’s leased property (collectively, the “Existing Use Agreement”).

B. The City has subleased certain portions of the Original County Property pursuant to the following lease agreements: (1) Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the South Lake Chamber of Commerce dated April 4, 2006; and (2) a Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the Tahoe Art League dated May 7, 2012 (“Existing City Subleases”). In addition, City has entered into a Sublease Agreement between the California Tahoe Emergency Services Operations Authority, dated February 11, 2020 (“EMS Sublease”).
1027
Exhibit F-2
C. City and County have negotiated and entered into that certain Agreement for Development, Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated (the “New 56- Acre Agreement”) to set forth the terms and conditions relating to (1) the amendment and restatement of the Original 56-Acre Agreements; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City’s ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with the Master Plan; and (4) County’s use of certain portions of the 56-Acre Property.

D. In connection with consideration of the Master Plan and the New 56-Acre Agreement, the City completed review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration.

E. Pursuant to the terms of the New 56-Acre Agreement, County desires to ground lease the property described and depicted in Attachment 1 to this Lease (“Leased Property”) to City, subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease.

NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to these Recitals and on the terms and conditions contained in this Lease, City and County agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

LEASE OF PREMISES

1.1 Property. County leases to City, and City leases from County, the Leased Property. County and City acknowledge that all buildings and improvements currently located on the Leased Property constructed by City are and remain the sole property of City. City shall have no rights to subsurface minerals, petroleum, and other hydrocarbon substances, and County expressly reserves all of its rights to same.

1.2 Existing Recreation Center Site. City shall demolish the existing recreation center on the Leased Property upon the completion of the new Multi-Generational Center pursuant to the terms and conditions of the New 56-Acre Agreement.

1.3 As-Is Conveyance. City specifically acknowledges and agrees that County is leasing the Leased Property on an “as is with all faults” basis, condition and state of repair inclusive of all faults and defects, whether known or unknown, as may exist as of the Effective Date.

ARTICLE II

IMPROVEMENTS

2.1 Improvements. City shall have the sole authority over the development, operation and use of the Leased Property, and may determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, the type and nature of any and all improvements to be located on the Leased Property, subject to the use requirements in Section 5.1 below. The City authority described herein shall include the sole responsibility for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of all existing and new improvements on the Leased Property. County and City staff shall work cooperatively in the development, construction, operation and maintenance of the Leased Property. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. In a 1028
Exhibit F-3
manner consistent with the Master Plan, in developing the Leased Property, the City shall endeavor to adequately preserve all historically-significant buildings currently located on the Leased Property and to locate and design any new recreational or government facilities in a manner that is complementary to the historically-significant buildings as identified in the Master Plan.

2.2 Maintenance by City. Throughout the Term of this Lease, City shall have the duty to alter, rectify, correct, or replace any defective or dilapidated condition on the Leased Property at its sole cost and expense, including keeping and maintaining any and all existing and new facilities and improvements on the Leased Property in good order, condition and repair and in a safe and sanitary condition in compliance with all applicable laws in all material respects, and making all necessary repairs, including nonstructural and structural repairs, abatement, alterations, improvements, or additions to the Leased Property required to be made by law, statute, ordinance, order, or regulation now or hereafter made or issued by any federal, state, county, local, or other governmental agency or entity, except in the event of Loss or Damage pursuant to Article VII below. City specifically acknowledges and agrees that County does not have and shall not have any obligations with respect to the maintenance of the facilities and improvements on the Leased Property, except to the extent of County’s negligent actions or omissions. City and County will meet and confer to address issues identified in a facility assessment study to be conducted by the County on the Leased Property.

2.3 Liens and Stop Notices. City shall keep the Leased Property free and clear of all stop notices, mechanics’ liens and other liens on account of any improvements constructed by or for City. City shall indemnify and save County harmless against liability, loss, damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and all other expenses on account of claims of lien of laborers or materialmen or others for work performed or materials or supplies furnished to City or persons claiming under it.

If a claim of a lien or stop notice is given or recorded affecting County’s interest in the Leased Property, City shall within 30 days of notice of such recording or service: (a) pay and discharge the same; (b) effect the release thereof by recording and delivering to County a lien release bond in customary form and amount which results in the removal of such lien from the Leased Property; or (c) otherwise obtain or effect the release thereof.

2.4 Title to Improvements.
a. City shall have title to and ownership of any and all improvements and facilities constructed on the Leased Property by City under this Lease. b. Upon the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, City and County shall meet and confer to coordinate and agree to terms regarding the ownership and/or removal or replacement of the improvements and facilities located on the Leased Property.

ARTICLE III
TERM

3.1 Term. The term of this Lease shall be for fifty (50) years from the Effective Date (the “Initial Term”). The Lease shall be automatically extended on an annual basis up to a total 1029
Exhibit F-4
of ninety-nine (99) years. The Initial Term in addition to any automatic extensions pursuant to this Section 3.1 shall be referred to as the “Term.”

ARTICLE IV

MONETARY PROVISIONS

4.1 Reserve Fund. City shall establish and maintain a reserve fund (“Reserve Fund”) for the purpose of paying for the cost of repairs, replacements, renovations, or upgrades to the Leased Property (“Replacement Expenditures”). Commencing three months after the Effective Date, and quarterly thereafter, City shall set aside and deposit into the Reserve Fund an amount equal to (i) the fees generated from the campground on the Leased Property, and (ii) two percent (2%) of the total asset value of all of the facilities on the 56-Acre Property (excluding the ice arena) (“Set-Aside Amount”). All interest and earnings on the Reserve Fund shall be added to the Reserve Fund. If the Net Operating Profits, as defined in Section 4.2(a) below, are less than the Set-Aside Amount in any given year, neither City nor County are obligated to provide additional funds to the Reserve Fund. Replacement Expenditures shall include general repair and replacement, renovations and upgrades, and major capital improvement projects.

Replacement Expenditures shall not include periodic, recurring, or routine maintenance that keep facilities in an ordinarily efficient operating condition. City shall provide County with an annual report no later than June 30 of each fiscal year documenting the annual Net Operating Profits, the balance of the Reserve Fund, and how the funds have been used and allocated to Replacement Expenditures. City and County shall meet at least once a year to review the Reserve Fund and discuss and prioritize projects to be funded, including without limitation, an expenditure plan detailing the amount and purpose of Replacement Expenditures for the upcoming year, and any changes as may reasonably be necessary to the Set-Aside Amount. The City will maintain and manage the Reserve Fund. In the event of early termination of this Lease pursuant to Section

9.4, City and County shall meet and confer to discuss the management and use of the Reserve Fund.

4.2 Rent. City shall pay to County during the Term the following amounts (“Rent”):
a. Net Operating Profits. City shall pay County an amount equal to 50 percent (50%) of the Net Operating Profits that remain after the City funds the Reserve Fund as set forth in Section 4.1(a) above. Net Operating Profits shall be calculated as the amount received by the City from all revenues generated from any source for use and rent of the 56-Acre Property, excluding the ice arena, but including without limitation, campground, facilities at Lakeview Commons, existing and new facilities, activities or special events (including outdoor camps or other programs) associated with existing and new facilities, minus all City costs to operate, maintain and refurbish such facilities, including all staff costs, operating expenses, and any taxes or assessments paid (excluding campground capital improvement expenses funded by special campground infrastructure fees). Payments shall be made quarterly with the first payment due three months after the Effective Date. City shall deliver to County a reasonably detailed accounting of the Net Operating Profits with every quarterly payment made under this subsection (a), together with copies of such information as County may reasonably request. City shall maintain accurate books and records regarding City’s profits and costs and expenses; and County shall have the right from time to time to inspect such books and records during normal business hours.
1030
Exhibit F-5
b. Additional Rent. Beginning the later of (i) 30 years after the Effective Date, or (ii) upon the full retirement or payment of any City-issued original debt to fund the development and construction of a New Multi-Generational Center, City shall pay the Additional Rent Payment (as defined below) to County on an annual basis. If the Additional Rent Payment becomes due under subsection (i) above, the first Additional Rent Payment shall be due on or before the 31st anniversary date of the Effective Date. If the Additional Rent Payment becomes due under subsection (ii) above, the first Additional Rent Payment shall be due on or before the next anniversary of the Effective Date after the full retirement or payment of City-issued original debt and shall be pro-rated based on the percentage of the year remaining after such repayment.

Thereafter, the Additional Rent Payment shall be paid annually on or before the anniversary date of the Effective Date. The Additional Rent Payment is equal to $200,000, adjusted based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index, All Items, West Region, published by the United States Bureau of Statistics. The Consumer Price Index adjustment for the Additional Rent Payment will commence upon the Effective Date and continue annually for the Term of this Lease. Should said index either cease to exist or be modified so that it no longer performs its prior function, the Parties will meet and confer in order to determine a replacement index that most closely approximates said index.

4.3 Use of Rent Proceeds. The County agrees to spend all Rent received on County infrastructure and services in the Tahoe Basin area of El Dorado County, including, but not limited to, roads, trails, facilities, and utilities. County shall create a restricted fund for all Rent for tracking purposes. County shall provide City with an annual report no later than June 30 of each fiscal year documenting the Rent received, the balance of the restricted fund account, and how the funds have been used and allocated. City and County shall discuss the use of Rent as provided herein at the annual coordination meeting on use of the Reserve Fund. County has sole discretion to determine the use and allocation of the Rent but will consider the City’s input on the infrastructure and services that will be funded by the Rent proceeds.

4.4 Property Taxes and Assessments. At all times during the Term, City agrees to pay in a timely manner all taxes, assessments, fees, and charges that at any time during the Term may be levied or charged by the federal government, the state or any other tax or assessment levying body on any activity carried on under this Lease, any interest in this Lease, any possessory right that City may have in or to the Leased Property, or that is levied and assessed against the land that comprises the Leased Property and all improvements on the Leased Property. City, at no cost to County, reasonably may contest the legal validity or amount of any such taxes, assessments, or charges for which City is responsible, and institute such proceedings as City considers necessary.

4.5 Utilities. City, at its cost, shall be responsible for arranging for all utilities to be provided to the Property that are required for City’s use. Each Party shall be responsible for paying all charges for its use of water, gas, electricity, telephone, sewage, refuse, and any other utilities or materials used or consumed on the Property directly to the party providing such utilities or services.
1031
Exhibit F-6

ARTICLE V

USE OF THE PREMISES

5.1 Use. The City shall develop, operate and maintain the Leased Property for recreation and government facilities, with primary emphasis on recreation, to serve the residents and visitors of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. In the event City desires to use the Leased Property for any use other than set forth in this Section 5.1, City may submit a written request for a use exception to the County. County shall consider such request in its reasonable discretion and respond in writing to City within 30 days of receipt of the request.

5.2 County Use of Senior Center Facility. Upon the completion of the New MultiGenerational Center, County, at its option, may elect to continue providing older adult programs at the existing Senior Center facility. In the event County exercises this option, City and County shall meet and confer to coordinate and agree to terms regarding County’s continued use of the existing Senior Center facility.

5.3 County Resident Use. The City shall allow residents of El Dorado County that do not reside within the City limits to use existing and new recreation facilities on the Property under the same policies and fee schedule applicable to City residents.

5.4 Compliance with Laws. City shall, at City’s sole cost, promptly comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations (“Laws”), including Laws regarding Hazardous Materials as defined below, and with the requirements of any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the Leased Property, relating to or affecting the Leased Property or the development, condition, or use of the Leased Property, including the obligation to make improvements, repairs, and alterations required by such Laws, regardless of the cost thereof, at what point in time during the Term compliance is required, and whether such compliance was foreseen or unforeseen. “Hazardous Materials” means any substance, material, or waste which is or becomes regulated by any local governmental authority, the State of California, or the United States Government, including any material or substance which is: (i) defined as a “hazardous waste,” “extremely hazardous waste,” or “restricted hazardous waste” under Sections 25115, 25117 or 25122.7, or listed pursuant to Section 25140 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5 (Hazardous Waste Control Law); (ii) defined as a “hazardous substance” under Section 25316 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.8 (Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act); (iii) defined as a “hazardous material,” “hazardous substance,” or “hazardous waste” under Section 25501 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95 (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory); (iv) defined as a “hazardous substance” under Section 25281 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.7 (Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances); (v) petroleum; (vi) friable asbestos; (vii) polychlorinated biphenyls; (viii) listed under Article 9 or defined as “hazardous” or “extremely hazardous” pursuant to Article 11 of Title 22 of the California Administrative Code, Division 4, Chapter 20; (ix) designated as “hazardous substances” pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1317); (x) defined as a “hazardous waste” pursuant to Section 1004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §6901, et seq. (42 U.S.C. §6903); or (xi) defined as “hazardous substances” pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 1032
Exhibit F-7
Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §9601, et seq., as the foregoing statutes and regulations now exist or may hereafter be amended.

ARTICLE VI

INSURANCE

6.1 Insurance Required of City. During the Term, City shall provide, at its cost and expense, the following forms and amounts of insurance with respect to the Leased Property or such equivalent amounts through an insurance pool. Such insurance shall be primary to and not contributing with any other insurance, self-insurance, or joint self-insurance maintained by the County, shall name the County and its officers, officials and employees as additional insureds, and shall include, but not be limited to:
a. Fire and Extended Coverage Insurance in All Risk form, with vandalism and malicious mischief endorsements, covering the Property and the improvements against loss or damage in an amount equal to not less than 100% of the replacement cost of the improvements.
b. Broad Form Commercial General Liability Insurance protecting City against claims for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage based upon, or arising out of, the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance, directly or indirectly, of the Leased Property or improvements located thereon and all areas appurtenant thereto. Such insurance shall be written on an “occurrence” policy form providing single limit coverage in an initial amount of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and umbrella/excess liability insurance in not less than an initial amount of $5,000,000.
c. Auto Liability Insurance endorsed for all owned and non-owned vehicles in the initial amount of $2,000,000, combined single limit. d. Worker’s Compensation Insurance in an amount and form to meet all applicable requirements of the Labor Code of the State of California.

6.2 City’s Consultants, Contractors and Subcontractors. City shall require its consultants, contractors and subcontractors to maintain in force and effect worker’s compensation and such other employee, general liability and property insurance as is customary for similar construction projects. Other than worker’s compensation insurance, County and its officers, officials and employees shall be named as additional insureds on all such insurance and City shall provide certificates of insurance confirming such additional insured status prior to commencement of any construction work.

ARTICLE VII

LOSS OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY

7.1 General. No loss or damage by fire, earthquake, flood or any other cause resulting in either partial or total destruction of the improvements located on the Leased Property, including any fixtures, personal property, equipment or machinery used or intended to be used in connection with the Leased Property shall operate to terminate this Lease or to relieve or discharge City from the payment of any Rent. City may, but is not required to, repair, 1033
Exhibit F-8
reconstruct, and/or replace or cause to be repaired, reconstructed and/or replaced any improvements, including any fixtures or personal property used or intended to be used in connection with the Leased Property, in its sole discretion, provided that any insurance proceeds will be applied to the repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of the insured improvements.

7.2 Meet and Confer. In the event of partial or total destruction pursuant to Section

7.1 above, the Parties shall meet and confer to discuss the replacement of improvements and use of the Leased Property.

ARTICLE VIII

ASSIGNMENT

8.1 Assignment Provisions. The qualifications and identity of City are of particular concern to County and material considerations for entering into this Lease. City shall not mortgage, pledge, hypothecate, encumber, transfer, sublease, or assign City’s interest in the Leased Property or any part or portion thereof (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Transfer”) without the prior written consent of County, which consent may withhold in its reasonable discretion, except as provided herein. County hereby preapproves the Existing County Subleases and any subleases to other government entities and local community non-profits, which shall not require consent by County pursuant to this Section 8.1. In the event that County sells or transfer all or any portion of the Leased Property, it shall assign its rights and obligations under the Lease.

8.2 Notice of Assignment. City shall provide County with written notice of the proposed Transfer, together with a term sheet identifying the proposed assignee or subtenant, its use of the premises, the purchase price to be paid assignment of the Lease or rental rate for the sublease, at least ninety (90) days prior to the proposed effective date of the Transfer. County shall, no later than ninety (90) days after receipt of the information specified above, deliver written notice to City which shall indicate whether County give or withhold consent to the proposed Transfer. If consent is withheld, County shall set forth a detailed explanation of the basis for withholding consent. Should County consent to any Transfer, such consent and approval shall not constitute a waiver of any of the terms, conditions, covenants, restrictions or reservations of this Lease nor be construed as County’s consent to any further Transfer. Any document regarding the Transfer of the Leased Property or any part thereof shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of this Lease and in the event of such inconsistency, the provisions of this Lease shall control.

ARTICLE IX
DEFAULT; REMEDIES; TERMINATION

9.1 Remedies. If City at any time shall be in default in the payment of Rent or any other monetary sum called for by this Lease, or if either Party at any time shall be in default in the keeping and performing of any of its other covenants or agreements in this Lease, the nondefaulting Party shall provide written notice thereof to the alleged defaulting Party specifying the particulars of such default (“Notice of Default”). If the non-payment of Rent continues for 30 days after City’s receipt of Notice of Default or any other alleged default continues for 60 days after a Notice of Default, or if such other default is of a nature that curing the default will take 1034
Exhibit F-9
more than 60 days and the alleged defaulting Party has failed to commence to cure the default within 60 days and diligently pursue completion of such cure, then such Party shall be in “Default” under this Lease.

9.2 Dispute Resolution. In the event of a Default, the Parties shall promptly meet in an effort to resolve the issues raised. If the Parties fail to resolve the issues raised, mediation may be pursued by mutual agreement. It is the intent of the Parties to the extent possible that litigation be avoided as a method of dispute resolution.

9.3 Institution of Legal Actions. In the event that dispute resolution does not resolve a Default, the non-defaulting Party may file a legal action to pursue specific performance or injunctive relief. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of El Dorado, State of California, or in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of the State of California. Neither Party shall have the right to recover any consequential, punitive or special damages.

9.4 Termination. This Lease may be terminated by mutual consent of the Parties.

ARTICLE X

INDEMNITY

10.1 City’s Indemnity. City shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold County and its officers, employees, agents and representatives, harmless from any and all liabilities, obligations, orders, claims, damages, fines, penalties and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs (“Claims”) to the extent arising from or in connection with (a) any condition created in or about the Property during the Term; (b) any breach, violation, or nonperformance of any term, condition, covenant, or other obligation of City under this Lease; and (c) any liens or encumbrances on the Leased Property arising out of any work performed or materials furnished by or for City.

ARTICLE XI

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

11.1 Holding Over. If City shall hold over the Leased Property after the expiration of the Term with the consent of County, either express or implied, such holding over shall be construed to be a tenancy from month to month subject to all the covenants, conditions and obligations contained in this Lease. City hereby agrees to continue payment of all monetary sums (such as taxes, insurance, etc.) which are the City’s obligation under this Lease.

11.2 Quiet Possession. County agrees that City, upon paying the Rent and performing the covenants and conditions of this Lease, shall quietly have, hold and enjoy the Leased Property throughout the Term. County warrants to City that as of the Effective Date there are no existing tenancies on the Property.

11.3 Annual Review. The Parties shall meet at least once a year to review the status of the terms of the Leased and to ensure adequate communication and to strengthen the relationship between the Parties. Prior to the annual meeting date, each Party shall submit to the other Party a 1035
Exhibit F-10
written update on its compliance with the terms and obligations of this Lease. As part of such written update, County shall provide City with an accounting pursuant to Section 4.2 above.

11.4 Mutual Cooperation. Each Party agrees to cooperate with the other to implement the terms and conditions of this Lease and, in that regard, shall execute any and all documents which may be reasonably necessary, helpful, or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Lease.

11.5 Notices. Any notice to be given or other document to be delivered by either Party to the other hereunder shall be in writing and delivered to either Party personally or by depositing same in the United States mail, duly certified, with postage thereon fully prepaid and addressed to the Party for whom intended, as follows:

To City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager
To County: El Dorado County
Chief Administrative Office
330 Fair Lane
Placerville, CA 95667
Don Ashton, County Chief Administrative Officer
Either Party hereto, from time to time by written notice to the other Party, may designate a different address which shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices shall be effective when received. Any notice or other document sent by certified mail, as aforesaid, shall be deemed received 72 hours after the mailing thereof, as above provided.

11.6 Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any of the terms, covenants, agreement, restrictions or conditions of this Lease shall be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same or other covenants, agreements, restrictions and conditions hereof.

11.7 Binding. Subject to the restrictions set forth herein regarding assignment, each of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease shall extend to and be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of not only County and City but to each of their respective heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns.

11.8 No Joint Venture. The relationship of the Parties hereto is that of landlord and tenant, and it is expressly understood and agreed that County does not in any way or for any purpose become a partner of City or a joint venturer with City in the conduct of City’s business or otherwise.

11.9 Interpretation. The titles to the paragraphs of this Lease are not a part of this Lease and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any part of the Lease. 1036
Exhibit F-11

11.10 Covenants and Conditions. Each term and each provision to be performed by City or County, as the case may be, shall be construed to be both a covenant and a condition of this Lease.

11.11 Non-liability of Officials and Employees. No member, official or employee of either Party shall be personally liable to the other Party, in the event of any Default or breach or for any amount which may become due, or on any obligations under the terms of this Lease.

Each Party hereby waives and releases any claim it may have against the members, officials or employees of the other Party with respect to any Default or breach or for any amount which may become due under the terms of this Lease.

11.12 Full Knowledge of Signatories. Each Party represents and warrants to the other the following: they have carefully read this Lease, and in signing this Lease, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from their respective legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Lease; and, they have freely signed this Lease without any reliance upon any agreement, promise, statement or representation by or on behalf of the other Party, or their respective agents, employees, or attorneys, except as specifically set forth in this Lease.

11.13 Integration. This Lease, together with the exhibits incorporated by reference, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties as to the ground lease of the Leased Property and there are no conditions, representations or agreements regarding the matters covered by this Lease which are not expressed herein.

11.14 Restatement. This Lease amends and restates the Original County Leases in their entirety. As of the date of execution, the Original County Leases are of no further force and effect.

11.15 Amendments. This Lease may only be amended in writing signed by the Parties.

11.16 Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Lease shall be deemed executed when each Party notifies the other in writing that a counterpart has been signed by the notifying Party.

11.17 Contract Administrators. The County officer or employee with responsibility for administration of this Lease is Don Ashton, Chief Administrative Officer, or successor. The City officer or employee for responsibility for administration of this Lease is Joe Irvin, City Manager, or successor.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Lease as of the Effective Date.

CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a
municipal corporation
By: ___________________________
COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of California
By: _____________________________________
1037
Exhibit F-12
Mayor Chair, Board of County Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ______________________________
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By: _____________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
1038
Exhibit F-13
ATTACHMENT 1

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
[to be inserted]
1039
Exhibit G-1

EXHIBIT G

FORM AMENDMENT TO GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joe Irvin, City Manager
Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

NO TAX DUE

AMENDMENT TO GRANT DEED
(EL DORADO COUNTY TO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE)
WHERAS, the County of El Dorado granted and conveyed certain real property that consists of a portion of the property known as the 56-Acre Property to the City of South Lake Tahoe by Grant Deed dated April 17, 1973, and recorded in the Official Records of El Dorado County in Book 1189, at Page 88 (“Original Grant Deed”); and WHEREAS, the Original Grant Deed includes a list of six restrictions that range from requiring the property granted therein to be used for certain public uses to a limit on the square footage of impervious surface on the property (the “Restrictions”); and WHEREAS, the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and El Dorado County, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”) have entered into that certain Agreement for Development, Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated to set forth the terms and conditions relating to among other things (1) the amendment and restatement of a series of prior agreements regarding the lease and development of certain real property located within the County and City referred to as the 56-Acre Property; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property to effectuate development of the 56-Acre Property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City’s ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with a City-approved Master Plan; and (4) County’s use of certain portions of the 56-Acre Property (the “56-Acre Agreement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 56-Acre Agreement, County has agreed to transfer to City an approximately 10.2-acre site for the purpose of development and construction of a new Multi1040 Exhibit G-2
Generational Center, civic center, and parking lot, and an approximately 4.8 acre site to be used as a right-of-way, in exchange for the City’s grant to County of an approximately 11.45 acre site for County governmental or recreational use.

NOW THEREFORE, the County and City hereby amend the Original Grant Deed to amend and restate the Restrictions with the following restriction: “That said real property shall be used solely and exclusively for public use. Private residential, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided, however, that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall be permitted.”
Executed this day of , 202 .

CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a
municipal corporation
By:

Mayor
COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:

Chair of Board of County Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
1041
Exhibit G-3

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public
1042
Exhibit G-4

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature of Notary Public
1043
Resolution 2020-006 January 14, 2020 Page 1 of 5
Resolution 2020- 006
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
January 14, 2020
Outlining Proposed Terms for a New Agreement
Between El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of
Recreation and Government Facilities on the “56-Acres”

BACKGROUND
A. The property commonly known as the “56-Acres” is currently divided into multiple distinct parcels, with El Dorado County (the County) identified as the owner of approximately 41 acres and the City of South Lake Tahoe (the City) identified as the owner of approximately 15 acres.

B. The “56-Acres” is currently utilized for both County and City public facilities, and each entity’s responsibilities are outlined in multiple, older agreements (as amended) between the County and City that stipulate management and maintenance responsibilities.

C. The County and the City seek to maximize the public benefits derived from these parcels in the future, and seek to implement a new partnership to enable the provision of the highest quality recreation and government facilities and services on the “56-Acres” in the future.

D. Previous master planning activities for the “56-Acres” were completed but not implemented, and the County and the City seek to update previous planning efforts and implement an updated vision for the 56-Acres”.

E. The “56-Acres” is expected to become the identifiable recreation and government center of South Lake Tahoe in the future, with the future development of the “56-Acres” as a “Central Park-like” campus for South Lake Tahoe, with plentiful recreation facilities, the future centralization of City government facilities and services, and the promotion of a “downtown” environment centered on the 56-Acres” (including Lakeview Commons) and the existing Harrison Avenue commercial district.

F. County and City staff have been working collaboratively to identify potential future public improvements on the “56-Acres” and to identify terms for a new, 50-year+ agreement between the County and the City, and hereby present proposed terms for consideration by the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors and the South Lake Tahoe City Council.

G. California Tahoe Conservancy staff have indicated that grant funding is available for the development of an updated vision for the “56-Acres”, and have expressed support for the execution of a new agreement between El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe, and the future development, operation, and maintenance of recreation and government facilities on the “56-Acres”.

H. The El Dorado County Board of Supervisors’ and City Council’s direction to staff to draft a new, formal agreement based on the preliminary terms in this resolution creates no legal obligations unless and until the parties have negotiated, executed, and delivered a mutually acceptable agreement based upon information produced from the CEQA environmental process and shall not be construed as a binding commitment to approve that agreement, and the parties maintain full discretion to approve, not approve, or modify that agreement at such time it is presented for formal consideration.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B94F5A78-495C-41A2-BE22-00953F93AF5A 1044
Resolution 2020-006 January 14, 2020 Page 2 of 5
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe that:

1. The City Council recognizes and appreciates the need for the County and the City to work collaboratively on this initiative, and values a strong partnership between the two entities to enable the provision of the highest quality recreation and government facilities and services in our community.

2. The City Council supports efforts to develop the “56-Acres” as the identifiable recreation and government center of South Lake Tahoe in the future, with the future development of the “56-Acres” as a “Central Park-like” campus for South Lake Tahoe, with plentiful recreation facilities, the future centralization of City government services, and the promotion of a “downtown” environment centered on the “56-Acres” (including Lakeview Commons) and the existing Harrison Avenue commercial district.

3. The City Attorney, with assistance from the City Manager, is hereby directed to coordinate with the County Chief Administrative Officer and County Counsel to negotiate and draft a new formal agreement for the development, operation, and maintenance of recreation and government facilities on the “56-Acres”, consistent with the following proposed terms:
a. The City of South Lake Tahoe shall retain ownership of approximately 15 acres currently held by the City (or reconfigured upon mutual agreement), and shall lease the remaining approximately 41 acres from El Dorado County for the development, operation, and maintenance of recreation and government facilities on the entire “56-Acres”. b. The new agreement shall be for a term of 50 years, with provisions for automatic extension(s) if the City adheres to applicable development, operation, and maintenance requirements.
c. The new agreement shall supersede and consolidate all existing agreements, as amended, for the “56-Acres”, including Lakeview Commons, into one new agreement. d. The City shall develop, operate, and maintain the “56-Acres” for recreation and government facilities to serve the residents and visitors of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. e. The City shall have the sole authority to determine the desired improvements, and shall be solely responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance of all existing and new improvements on the 56-acres, with the following exceptions:
i. The County shall retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the El Dorado County library facility located on the northeast corner of the “56-Acres”. ii. The County shall vacate and abandon the existing vector control facility in a mutually-agreeable timeframe.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B94F5A78-495C-41A2-BE22-00953F93AF5A 1045
Resolution 2020-006 January 14, 2020 Page 3 of 5
iii. The City and the County shall share costs associated with any environmental remediation necessary on the “56-Acres”.
iv. The City shall provide ample space for County senior services programs in existing or new City facilities on the “56-Acres”, and the County shall be responsible for any operating costs associated with the provision of County programs in City facilities located on the “56-Acres”.
f. The City shall endeavor to construct a new Recreation / Swim / Senior Center facility on the 56-Acres”, generally located along US 50 on the northern edge of the “56-Acres” west of the existing library facility.
i. The City shall be responsible for all design, construction, and maintenance costs associated with a new Recreation / Swim / Senior Center facility, and shall own the new facility.
ii. The City shall allocate approximately 9,000 sq. ft. of space in the new facility for County senior programs, with a goal to maximize the use of all elements in the new Recreation / Swim / Senior Center facility for programs that benefit all user groups in the community.
iii. The existing Senior Center facility shall remain in operation until the City constructs a new Recreation / Swim / Senior Center facility on the “56-Acres”. g. As compensation for the new agreement between El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe, the City shall remit 50% of net campground operating profits to the County.

The calculation of net campground profits shall not include special campground infrastructure fees levied specifically for capital improvements to the existing campground and / or any future campground configuration, and shall not include campground capital improvement expenses funded by special campground infrastructure fees. i. The City shall also remit 50% of net operating profits associated with additional outdoor recreation facilities that may be developed in the future to the County as compensation for the new agreement.
ii. The City shall retain all net operating profits associated with existing and / or new indoor recreation facilities on the “56-Acres”.
h. As additional compensation for the new agreement between El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe, the City shall also remit an amount equal to $200,000 annually (in 2020 dollars) beginning in the later of year 30 of the new agreement or the full retirement of City-issued debt to finance the construction of the new Recreation / Swim / Senior Center facility. This annual payment shall be adjusted based on the annual change in the consumer price index, all items, West Region published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B94F5A78-495C-41A2-BE22-00953F93AF5A 1046
Resolution 2020-006 January 14, 2020 Page 4 of 5
i. In order to benefit the residents and visitors of South Lake Tahoe and the unincorporated areas of El Dorado County in the Tahoe Basin, the County commits to re-invest all compensation provided by the City under the new agreement into other County infrastructure initiatives in the Tahoe Basin area of El Dorado County. j. The intent of the new agreement is to enhance recreation facilities, programs, activities, and events available to the residents and visitors of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County, however, the City shall specifically have the right to design, construct, operate, and maintain a new City government / Police Station facility generally located along US 50 on the southern edge of the “56-Acres” in the future.
k. The City shall endeavor to adequately preserve all historically- significant buildings currently located on the “56-Acres”, and shall locate and design any new recreation and government facilities in a manner that is complementary to historically- significant buildings. l. Residents of El Dorado County (not residing in the City limits) shall be eligible to use existing and new recreation facilities on the “56-Acres” under the same policies and fee schedule applicable to City residents.
m. The County and the City commit to meet at least annually to ensure adequate communication, review the agreement, and strengthen the partnership between the two entities.
n. The County Counsel, City Attorney, County Chief Administrative Officer, and City Manager shall recommend and incorporate additional terms for inclusion in the new agreement that are necessary to promote a strong partnership, ensure clarity in the agreement, and address other concerns not contemplated herein.

4. The City Manager is hereby directed to seek funding and other assistance from the California Tahoe Conservancy to further refine the concepts outlined in this resolution, solicit additional public input, update previous master planning activities, and complete applicable State and Federal environmental reviews.

5. The City Attorney, with assistance from the City Manager, is hereby directed to present a new, formal agreement for the development, operation, and maintenance of recreation and government facilities on the 56 Acres to the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors and South Lake Tahoe City Council for consideration later in 2020.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on January 14, 2020 by the following vote:

Yes: Bass, Collin, Laine, Middlebrook and Wallace
Date:_________
Jason Collin, Mayor
DocuSign Envelope ID: B94F5A78-495C-41A2-BE22-00953F93AF5A 1/ 21/ 2020
1047
Resolution 2020-006 January 14, 2020 Page 5 of 5
Attest:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B94F5A78-495C-41A2-BE22-00953F93AF5A 1048
Resolution 2020-102 November 3, 2020 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2020-102
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
November 3, 2020
Revising the timeline for Outlining Proposed Terms for a New Agreement between El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe on the " 56-Acres" ( Resolution 2020-006).

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of El Dorado County and the South Lake Tahoe City Council adopted Resolution 007-2020 and Resolution 2020-006 at their respective January 14, 2020 meetings outlining the proposed terms for a new 50-year+ agreement between the City and County for the future development, operation, and maintenance of recreation and government facilities on the “56-Acres” and directed staff to proceed with drafting a new formal agreement based on the preliminary terms outlined in the resolutions to be considered by the Board of Supervisors and the City Council later in 2020; and
WHEREAS, Since that time, the City Manager and City Attorney have been working in coordination with the Chief Administrative Officer of El Dorado County and County Counsel to negotiate and draft a new formal agreement for the development, operation, and maintenance of recreation and government facilities on the " 56 Acres" property, consistent with proposed terms in the Resolutions; and
WHEREAS, To identify potential future public improvements on the "56-Acres", City and County have begun the process to develop a Master Plan, considering site opportunities and constraints, and involving stakeholder groups and the members of the public, to be followed by a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis for the Master Plan, for consideration by the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors and the South Lake Tahoe City Council; and WHEREAS, The terms of the agreement between the County and the City and the associated lease would be informed by the Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, The El Dorado County Board of Supervisors' and City Council directed staff to negotiate the agreement based upon information produced from the CEQA environmental process; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15378( a)(3), an activity involving the issuance of a lease by a public agency is considered a project under CEQA and therefore subject to CEQA review; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the planning process and the associated CEQA environmental review will be completed near the end of 2021, and that following the completion of the Master Plan and CEQA analysis, a final draft agreement between the City and the County will be negotiated and brought before the South Lake Tahoe City Council and El Dorado County Board of Supervisors.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8B389B80- 21D6-431F-A44A-0B20D028AB30 1049
Resolution 2020-102 November 3, 2020 Page 2 of 2
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Directs the City Manager and City Attorney to present a new, formal agreement for the development, operation, and maintenance of recreation and government facilities on the 56 Acres" to the South Lake Tahoe City Council for consideration following the completion of the Master Plan Process and associated CEQA analysis.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on November 3, 2020 by the following vote:

Yes: Bass, Collin, Laine, Middlebrook and Wallace
Date:_________
Jason Collin, Mayor
Attest:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8B389B80- 21D6-431F-A44A-0B20D028AB30 11/ 10/ 2020
1050

REMAINING
COUNTY
PARCEL 2

REMAINING
ROW

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 4

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 5

PROPOSED
CITY ROW 1

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 1

PROPOSED
CITY ROW 2

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 2

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3 RUFUS ALLEN BOULEVARD

FUTURE ROAD
50 STATE

H I GHWAY

REMAINING
CITY PARCEL 1
100'

EXISTING CITY PARCELS

PARCEL NAME AREA

EXISTING COUNTY PARCELS

PARCEL NAME AREA

PROPOSED CITY PARCELS

PARCEL NAME AREA

PROPOSED COUNTY PARCELS

PARCEL NAME AREA

OVERALL PROJECT BOUNDARY

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

PROPOSED PARCEL LINE

EXISTING/PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
NOTES:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
"PARCEL MODIFICATIONS"
56 ACRE SITE
(916) 366-3040 Fax (916) 366-3303
905 Sutter Street Suite 200 Folsom CA 95630
Civil Engineers | Land Surveyors | LiDAR
R. E. Y. ENGINEERS, Inc.

JOB NO.: 8195.001
1051
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 1/13/2022
Department Agenda Item Agenda Section
Feb.1, 9 a.m. City Clerk City Council Protocols and Boards and Commissions Updates Dev Services Movable Tiny Homes ordinance (second reading) Finance Transfer of Unclaimed Check Funds
FD/PD/PW Annual Reports
Pub. Works Master PSA Airport Arch.l, Eng., Const. Mgmt, & DBE Compliance Support Serv.

Underground Storm Drain Pipe Focused Condition Assessment Draft RFP for Braodband Services
Clean CA Grant & CA Parks RecTrails Program - TV Greenbelt & Bikeway 1C Feb. 15, 5:30 p.mCity Manager Tahoe Way Discussion
Dev Serv Property Management rental incentive PSA
Plan Area Statement Update for Tourist Accommodation Uses TRPA Comodity Apprasal
Finance Fiscal Year 2021-22 Quarterly Financial Status Report – QE December 31, 202 Consent Investment Portfolio Report – December 31, 2021 Consent Public Works EIP Project update Presentation
Award contract for LED Light Retrofit (US Hwy 50)
1052
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 1/13/2022
Mar. 1, 9 a.m. DevServices PLHA Moderate Income Homebuyer Administration PSA Local Housing Revenue feasibility study PSA
Reach Code PSA
Finance 2021-2022 Master Fee Schedule NB
Authorizing Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Assessment FD/PD/PW Annual Reports
Public Works Award Contract PD - Community Recource Center Renovations SW Gas Prestentation Renewable Energy Goals
SB 1383 Grant
Award PSA Fire Station II Feasability Study
Mar. 15, 5:30 p.mCity Attny Cannabis Ordinance Amendments (First Reading) Finance 2021-2022 Fiscal Year Budget Mid-Year Adjustments NB 2021-2022 Master Fee Schedule Consent
5-year plan NB
2020-2021 Small Business Sustainability (SBS) Loans Update UB Dev. Serv. PSA CConsulting Services Developing Local Green Building Standard Ord “Reach Code” 1053
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 1/13/2022
Mar. 29, 9 a.m.

April 5, 9 a.m. City Attny Cannabis Ordinance Amendments (Second Reading) Finance City Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) FY ended 09/30/2021 Consent Ski Run BID Levy of Assessment for Business License Year 2022/2023 PH Dev Serv Tourist Core Area Plan Amendment: 3828 Montreal Rd May 3, 9 a.m.

May 17, 5:30 p.m Pub. Works Award FY 2023 Airport Master Plan RFQ June 7, 5:30 p.m.

June 21, 5:30 p.m.

Aug. 9, 9 a.m.

Aug. 23, 9 a.m. Budget Workshop
Sept. 6, 9 a.m.

Sept. 20, 5:30 p.m.

Oct. 4, 9 a.m.

Nov. 1, 9 a.m.

Nov. 15, 5:30 p.m.

Dec.13, 9 a.m.
1054
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 1/13/2022
City Attorney Parking Garage License Agreement with Verizon City Attny/PW Undergrounding Utilities
Amendments to Small Cell Policy
Liberty Utilities Franchise Agreement
City Clerk Records Management Policy (Updated)
Pride Month Proclamation (June)
Policy - Use of Personal Devices for City Business
City Manager Economic Development Strategy
Juvenile Treatment Center Discussion
Non Profit Community Benefit Grant Policy
ARPA Project Funding List (If 5M is allocated to Ski Run Affordable Housing Project) TRPA’s proposed RTP funding structure discussion
Potential new City slogan
Customer satisfaction survey(s)
Dev Services Inclusionary housing ordinance
RFP for consulting firms for Bijou / Al Tahoe Area Plan and Bijou Parks Master Plan Unscheduled/Pending
1055
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 1/13/2022
Plan Area Statement 111 amendment
Single Room Occupancy Program Amendments
Outside Eating Code Review (coverage, seating, parking etc) HOME grant application resolution
Fire
Police
Public Works Award Engineering and Construction Contract South Hangar Taxi Lane Rehab SEED Solar Photovoltaic Project PPA
Award - James and Eloise Drainage Improvement Project Phase 1 Award FY 2023 Airport Master Plan RFQ
Facility Condition Assessment & Plan – Parking Garage
Airport Deferred Maintenance Plan
Award 5-Year Lease/Concession for Airport Suite # 105
Lake Tahoe Blvd Class 1 Bike Trail (Viking Way to Y)
Award Contract Third part Plan Review Services - Rec & Aquatic Center Recreation Bijou Park Master Plan
Bijou Golf Course "Rock the Lake" Event and Review
1056

South Lake Tahoe City CouncilJanuary 18, 2022

South Lake Tahoe City Council
January 18, 2022