South Lake Tahoe City Council
May 16, 2023

1 City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 5:30 PM
City Hall - Council Chambers - 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe City Council
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Cody Bass, Mayor Pro Tem
John Friedrich, Councilmember
Tamara Wallace, Councilmember
Scott Robbins, Councilmember
Mission of the City Council
The City was established to provide essential,
outstanding and cost-effective services that
enhance environmental sustainability, economic
vitality and the quality of life for our residents,
businesses and guests.

Public Participation
City Council meetings are held in person at the time and location listed on this agenda. Meetings are live-streamed on Channel 21, City website at www.cityofslt.us, YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3LYne8Ih-kTPLnnuyJW9SQ/live and via ZOOM at this link https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83633510829
A public agenda packet is available for review at City Hall, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, on the City’s Website at www.cityofslt.us, or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office, (530) 542-6005 or [email protected] Providing Public Comment:

In Person: Every agenda for regular meetings provides an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the legislative body (City Council), on any item of public interest which is within the jurisdiction of the City Council during Public Communications. For items on the agenda or in connection with any item which the City Council will consider, the public is given the opportunity to comment before or during the City Council's consideration of the item [Government Code Section 54954.3(a)].

By Phone: If you are joining the meeting via ZOOM and would like to make a comment, press the “raise a hand” button.

If you are joining the meeting via Channel 21 or live stream and would like to make a comment, please call (530) 542-6500. The meeting ID is ID: 836 3351 0829 press *9 to indicate a desire to make a comment. Press *6 to unmute your phone. The Clerk will call you by the last three digits of your phone number when it is your turn to speak.

In Writing: Written comments received by 3 p.m. the day before the meeting will be distributed to City Council prior to the meeting. Written public comment regarding any item on this agenda may be sent to [email protected].

When emailing comments, identify the agenda item number in the subject line to which your comments relate. Any 1 2
such comment that is a public record and is emailed to [email protected] or otherwise provided to a majority of the City Council before the meeting will be made available for public inspection during normal business hours at the City Clerk's Office located at City Hall, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe [Government Code Section 54957.5(b)]. Written comments will not be read out loud during the meeting.

The City Council Chambers meeting facility is accessible to people with disabilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate any person needing special assistance to attend this meeting. Contact the City Clerk at (530) 542-6005 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting for assistance [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II and Brown Act Government Code Sections 54953.2, 54954.1, 54954.2, and 54957.5].

Spanish Interpretations: The public may access Spanish interpretation using the ZOOM link listed on the front of the Agenda from an internet device (smartphone, laptop, tablet, home computer) with audio capabilities and selecting the Spanish language option. Persons without an internet device may attend the meeting in-person and a device will be provided while supplies last. Requests for interpreter services to offer public comment may be made by contacting the City Clerk.

Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Proclamation

1. Proclamation Recognizing May 2023 as "Mental Health Awareness Month" Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Issue a Proclamation to Barton Health recognizing May 2023 as "Mental Health Awareness Month".

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Item 1 - Executive Summary.pdf
Mental Health Awareness
City Commissions and Student Advisory Reports
Public Communications
This is the public's opportunity to speak on any topic NOT LISTED on this agenda. Comments shall be limited to four (4) minutes. In accordance with the Brown Act, the City Council cannot deliberate or vote on any matter raised under public communications, but may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed. (Government Code Sections 54954.2)
Consent Agenda
Public Comment - This is the public's opportunity to speak on any topic listed on the Consent Agenda.

Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes.

The consent agenda consists of items of a repeating or routine nature considered under a single action.

Any Councilmember may have an item on the consent agenda removed and considered separately upon request.
2 3
Pass a Motion to adopt the Consent Agenda in one motion except as indicated at each item.

2. City Council Meeting Minutes
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion approving the April 4, 2023, City Council meeting minutes.

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Item 2 - Executive Summary.pdf
04 04 2023 CC Minutes.pdf

3. Allocation of Senior Planner Position
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing an amendment to FY 2022-2023 list of Allocated Permanent Positions to add one Senior Planner position.

Responsible Staff Member: Ember Buckman, Human Resources Manager Item 3 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - Allocation of Senior Planner Position.docx 02-Resolution - Allocation of Senior Planner Position.docx 03-Position Allocation 22-23 May 2023 (Exh. 1 to Reso).pdf

4. Grant Application to California Tahoe Conservancy for $3.9 Million for Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, Phase 2
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution ratifying the submission of an implementation grant application to the California Tahoe Conservancy requesting up to $3.9 million for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project (Tahoe Valley), Phase 2, and authorizing the acceptance of the grant funding, and appropriation of the grant funding to the Tahoe Valley, Phase 2 Project.

Responsible Staff Member: Stan Hill, Engineering Manager and Jason Burke, Complete Streets Program Manager
The Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project on May 9, 2019. The current action is within the scope of the MND and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines section 15162.

Item 4 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - CTC Grant Application.docx
02-Project Location Map.pdf
03-Resolution - CTC Grant Authorization.doc

5. Agreements for On-Call Building Inspection and Permit Technician Services with BPR Consulting Group, Willdan Engineering, and 4Leaf, Inc.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing the Mayor to execute Professional Services Agreements in a combined total amount not to exceed $120,000 with BPR Consulting Group, Willdan Engineering, and 4Leaf, Inc. for Building Inspector and Permit Technician staffing services.
3 4
Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Item 5 - Executive Summary.pdf
01 - Staff Report.docx
02 - RFP Building Staffing.pdf
03-Agreement with Willdan.docx
04-Agreement with 4Leaf.docx
05-Agreement with BPR.docx

6. Donation Acceptance - Bijou Skate Park
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a resolution accepting a donation from Methodology Inc. in an amount of $15,445 for use in the Bijou Skate Park.

Responsible Staff Member, Kelley Edwards, Recreation Manager Item 6 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - Bijou Skate Park Donation.docx
02-Resolution_Donation Bijou Skate Park.docx
03-Skate Park Donation Proposal.pdf
04-Donation Approval Form Bijou Skate Park.pdf
05-Donation Acknowledgment Letter Bijou Skate Park.pdf

7. Sugar Pine Village – 2020/2021 HOME Investment Partnerships Program Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit and accept an application for HOME Investment Partnership Program funds for Sugar Pine Village Phase 2B.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services The Sugar Pine Village project is statutorily exempt from review under CEQA under Government Code section 65913.4 (Senate Bill 35).

Item 7 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - SPV HOME2B.docx
02-Res 2022-022 Sugar Pine Village HOME Investment Program.pdf 03-Reso Modifying Reso 2022-022.docx

8. Acceptance of Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant from CalRecycle for $70,000 and Agreement with Clean Tahoe for Homeless Encampment Cleanups Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution accepting a grant award in the Amount of $70,000 through the CalRecycle Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant Pilot Program and authorizing and directing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Clean Tahoe to enhance and expand the cleanup efforts of homeless encampments throughout the South Lake Tahoe area.

Responsible Staff Member: Lori Marino, Principal Management Analyst This action is exempt from review under CEQA Guidelines sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land), and 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment).

Item 8 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - Cal Recycle Grant Award.docx
4 5
02-Resolution - CalRecycle Grant Acceptance.docx
03-Clean Tahoe Agreement.docx
Regular-Unfinished Business

9. Road Rehabilitation Program Update
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive and File.

Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works Item 9 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report-Pavement Management Plan Update.docx
02 - Draft City of South Lake Tahoe Condition Report.pdf 03 - Annual Report Rehab Presentation.pptx
Regular-New Business

10. Washoe Tribe Land Acknowledgement Presentation and Resolution Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive Presentation from Washoe Tribe and Pass a Resolution acknowledging the Washoe Tribe land acknowledgement.

Responsible Staff Member: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager Item 10 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff_Report_-_Washoe_Tribe_Presentation__1_.docx
02-Resolution-_Washoe_Tribe_Land_Acknowledgement.docx

11. Grant Application to Tahoe Network of Fire Adapted Communities for $969,692 for Defensible Space Inspectors and Chipper Crew
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving a Tahoe Network of Fire Adapted Communities (TNFAC) sub-recipient grant application submittal to Tahoe Resource Conservation District (TRCD) in the amount of $969,692.65 for hiring of three seasonal part-time Defensible Space Inspectors and funding the South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue Chipper crew.

Responsible Staff Members: Jay Manning, Battalion Chief and Lori Marino, Principal Management Analyst
Item 11 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - TRCD Defensible Space Funding.docx
02-Resolution-TRCD Defensible Space Funding.docx

12. Electric Vehicle Charging Station Ordinance (First Reading) Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion to hold a first reading (by title only) of an Ordinance amending the South Lake Tahoe City Code Sections 6.15.160 to codify procedures for expediting permitting processing for electric vehicle charging systems and refer second reading and adoption to the June 6, 2023 meeting.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services 5 6
Item 12 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - EV Charging.docx
02-PC Resolution 2023-005 EV Charging
03-Ordinance - EV Charging.docx

13. Public Works Department Annual Report 2022
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive and File.

Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works Item 13 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - Annual Report
02-PW Annual Report 2022- Final.pdf

14. Tahoe Valley Area Plan: 2023 Amendments
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive a Presentation, hold a discussion, and provide feedback on the amendments under consideration for the Tahoe Valley Area Plan.

Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner Item 14 - Executive Summary.pdf
01 - Staff Report - TVAP Amendments.docx
02 - Presentation.pptx
03 - Tahoe Valley Area Plan.pdf
04 - TVAP Stakeholder Feedback.docx
05 - PC Meeting Feedback 2023-02-23.docx
06 - TVAP Project Description.docx

15. Tourist Core Area Plan: 2023 Amendments
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive a presentation, hold a discussion, and provide feedback on the amendments under consideration for the Tourist Core Area Plan.

Responsible Staff Member: Madison Dederick, Assistant Planner Item 15 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - TCAP Amendments.docx
02-Tourist Core Area Plan.pdf
03-TCAP Stakeholder Feedback.docx
04-PC Meeting Feedback 2023-02-23.docx
05-TCAP Presentation.pptx
06-TCAP Project Description.docx
Agenda Planning Calendar

16. Agenda Planning Calendar
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: A Councilmember may request that an item be placed on a future agenda. Upon the support of one (1) additional Council Member, direction shall be given to the City Manager to calendar the item for a convenient future agenda, but no sooner than the second meeting after the request was made, and/or modify the Agenda Planning Calendar as desired. 6 7
Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, City Manager
Item 16 - Executive Summary.pdf
APC -05 11 2023.pdf
Updates and Announcements (City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager) Councilmember Reports and Comments - Assignments to Boards, Committees, and Commissions Adjournment
I, Susan Blankenship, City Clerk for the City of South Lake Tahoe, declare that the foregoing agenda for the Tuesday May 16, 2023 meeting of the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council was posted and available for review on Thursday, May 11, 2023 at City Hall, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. The agenda was also available on the City website at https://www.cityofslt.us.

Signed May 11, 2023
\\sb\\
Susan Blankenship, Elected City Clerk
7 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 1
Agenda Item: Proclamation Recognizing May 2023 as "Mental Health Awareness Month" Executive Summary: On May 2, 2023, City Council approved a proclamation request from Barton Health to recognise May 2023 as "Mental Health Awareness Month".

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Issue a Proclamation to Barton Health recognizing May 2023 as "Mental Health Awareness Month".

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Responsible Staff Member: Susan blankenship, City Clerk (530) 542-6005 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:

Mental Health Awareness Month.pdf
8 9
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 2
Agenda Item: City Council Meeting Minutes
Executive Summary: City Council is asked to formally approve the April 4, 2023, City Council meeting minutes.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion approving the April 4, 2023, City Council meeting minutes.

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk (530) 542-6005 Reviewed and Approved By:

Attachments:
04 04 2023 CC Minutes.pdf
10 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 04, 2023 at 5:30 PM
City Hall - Council Chambers - 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe City Council
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Cody Bass, Mayor Pro Tem
John Friedrich, Councilmember
Tamara Wallace, Councilmember
Scott Robbins, Councilmember
Mission of the City Council
The City was established to provide essential,
outstanding and cost-effective services that
enhance environmental sustainability, economic
vitality and the quality of life for our residents,
businesses and guests.

NOTE: The Meeting Minutes represent actions taken during the meeting of the City Council. Complete Council members discussions on Regular Session meeting items can be viewed in archived video recordings on the City’s website at http://www.cityofslt.us Public submittals on items are retained in the administrative record and can be viewed in the City Clerk’s repository at http://www.cityofslt.us
Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance
At 5:35 p.m. Mayor Creegan called the meeting to order. Creegan then led the pledge of allegiance to the flag.

Roll Call
Present were Mayor Creegan, Councilmembers Bass, Friedrich, Robbins and Wallace.

Also present were City Manager Irvin, City Attorney Stroud and City Clerk Blankenship.

Closed Session Report 04 04 2023
Public Employee Performance Evaluations – Government Code section 54957(b)(1) Action: No reportable action.

Public Communications
Public Comment was heard from the following people:

1. Mr. Keck – Vail/Heavenly Ski Resort parking

2. Ed Mosur – end of winter
Presentations

1. Presentation by Keep Tahoe Blue
Action: Received a presentation from Keep Tahoe Blue regarding Polystyrene Ordinance outreach efforts.

The following people addressed the Council:

1. Gavin Feiger, League to Save Lake Tahoe

2. Marilee Movius, League to Save Lake Tahoe
Public Comment was heard from the following people:

3. Steve Knoll

4. Jana Menard

5. Ed Mosur
11 2
04 04 2023 CC Minutes
City Commissioner and Student Advisory Report

1. Milo King, Student Advisory - midterms week, Climbing Crew clothes drive, local emergency housing options for teens.

Consent Agenda
Note: City Clerk noted that Item 6 was added to the Consent Agenda.

Action: Moved/Seconded: Bass/Wallace
Yes: Bass, Creegan, Friedrich, Robbins and Wallace
Action: Passed Consent Agenda with noted inclusion.

2. Participation in National Opioid Litigation Settlements (Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart) and Acceptance and Appropriation of Settlement Funds Action: Passed Resolution 2023-030 approving participation in National Opioid Litigation Settlements C-046-2023 (Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart) and accepting and appropriating settlement funds.

3. California Automated Permit Processing Program Grant Application Action: Passed Resolution 2023-031 authorizing the Director of Development Services to submit a grant application to the California Automated Permit Processing Program for an amount up to $40,000 and authorizing the City Manager to execute grant documents if awarded.

4. Contract with West Coast Paving for Pothole Repair on Pioneer Trail, Johnson Blvd and Park Ave
Action: Passed Motion 2023-032 authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute contract C-040-2023 with West Coast Paving for an amount of $244,840 and 10% contingency of $24,480 for pothole repair on selected roadways in the City.

CEQA Determination: The project is categorically exempt from CEQA review under CEQA Guidelines section 15301(c) (Existing Facilities).

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur
Regular-Unfinished Business

5. Termination of Proclamation of Local Emergency Due to Severe Winter Storms Action: Moved/Seconded: Bass/Wallace
Yes: Bass, Creegan, Friedrich, Robbins and Wallace
Action: Passed Resolution 2023-033 terminating the proclamation of local emergency due to severe winter storms.

Regular-New Business

6. 2022-2023 Master Fee Schedule
Note: This item was approved under the Consent Agenda
Action: Passed Resolution 2023-032 adopting the Annual Master Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur

7. Agreement with Design Workshop for Preparation of the Mid-Town Area Plan in Amount Not to Exceed $598,697
Action: Council directed staff to add and solicit a permanent Senior Planner position.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. David Gregorich, Parks and Recreation Commission

2. Ed Mosur

3. Nick Speal
12 3
04 04 2023 CC Minutes

8. Potential Amendments to Purchasing Ordinance Regarding Apprenticeship, Health Care, and Local Hire Provisions for Public Works Contracts
Action: City Council provided direction to the City Attorney to meet with Nor Cal Carpenters Local Union to incorporate local hire preference within the Tahoe Basin portion of El Dorado County for Design Build projects.

Public Comment was heard from the following people:

1. Dan Watson, Nor Cal Carpenters Union – postpone Item #8

2. Seth Howard, Nor Cal Carpenters Union – postpone Item #8

3. Josh Rice, Local 1789 – local hire for projects

4. Gilberto Tovar, Local 1789 -local hire for projects

5. Adrian, Local 1789 – local hire for projects
Agenda Planning Calendar

9. Agenda Planning Calendar
Action: Received.

Updates and Announcements (City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager) City Clerk;

1. Issued a proclamation to the South Tahoe Association of Realtors recognizing April as “Fair Housing Month”. (Council consensus)

2. Proclamation request from the Child Abuse Prevention Council recognizing May as “Child Abuse Prevention Month” (Council consensus)
City Manager:

1. Meeting with Senator Alvarado-Gil

2. Senior planner recruitments
Councilmember Reports and Comments - Assignments to Boards, Committees, and Commissions Councilmember Friedrich:

1. Meeting with Senator Alvarado-Gil

2. Upcoming Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Board meeting Councilmember Bass:

1. Upcoming Tahoe Transportation District Board meeting

2. Upcoming Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority workshop

3. Support for working with Lake Tahoe Unified School District on housing needs for students Councilmember Wallace:

1. St. Josephs Riverside Drive Open House event

2. Upcoming League of Cities “Legislative Day” event
Councilmember Robbins:

1. Highway 50 condition, repaving issue (Bass second)

2. Attended reception with Senator Alvarado-Gil
Mayor Creegan:

1. Meeting with Senator Alvarado-Gil, field offices

2. South Tahoe Chamber of Commerce meeting attendance
.

Adjournment
At 8:27 p.m. Mayor Creegan adjourned the meeting.
________________________ _______________
Cristi Creegan, Mayor Date
Attest:
______________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
13 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 3
Agenda Item: Allocation of Senior Planner Position
Executive Summary: During the April 4, 2023 City Council meeting, the City Development Services Director recommended entering into a contract with a consultant for preparation of the Mid-Town Area Plan in order to achieve City Council Strategic Plan Priority 1, Built Environment, Action Item 1.2. At completion of the presentation, staff was instead directed by Council to bring back a staff report and resolution adding a Senior Planner position in order to assist with this goal. Staff is now presenting the Staff report and resolution to add the Senior Planner position to the City Allocated Permanent Positions.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing an amendment to FY 2022-2023 list of Allocated Permanent Positions to add one Senior Planner position.

Responsible Staff Member: Ember Buckman, Human Resources Manager Responsible Staff Member: Ember Buckman, Human Resources Manager Reviewed and Approved By:

Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Allocation of Senior Planner Position.docx 02-Resolution - Allocation of Senior Planner Position.docx 03-Position Allocation 22-23 May 2023 (Exh. 1 to Reso).pdf 14 Council Agenda Report- May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Allocation of Senior Planner Position
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Ember Buckman, Human Resources Manager Background:The City Council's Strategic Plan Priority 1, Built Environment, Action Item 1.2 is the revitalization of the Mid-Town area. The City is undertaking the development of the Mid-Town Area Plan to guide future land uses and development to meet the needs of residents, businesses, visitors, and the environment. The Mid-Town Area Plan will leverage the adopted 56-acre Master Plan and existing infrastructure at Lakeview Commons and Harrison Avenue to further transform mid-town into a recreation, arts, and community hub.

The Mid-Town Area Plan would encompass the Bijou/Al Tahoe, Sierra Tahoe Commercial, Bijou Community Park, and Bijou Meadow/Golf Course areas and would provide land use guidance for all future redevelopment and development opportunities in the Mid-Town area.

Staff Presented a Professional Services Agreement and Fund Appropriation for the Mid-Town Area Plan to Council on April 4, 2023.

Issue and Discussion: During Staff presentation of the Professional Services Agreement and Fund Appropriation for the Mid-Town Area Plan to Council on April 4, 2023, staff requested authorization for the Mayor to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Design Workshop for consulting services to prepare the Mid-Town Area Plan.

The consultant team was expected to lead the planning effort, including outreach and public engagement efforts, policy development, development of design standards, prepare conceptual land visions, and draft implementation strategies. In addition, the consultant scope of work included preparing a program-level environmental impact analysis in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Chapter 3 of the TRPA Code of Ordinances and Article 6 of the TRPA Rules of Procedures.

City Council did not grant authorization for the Mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Design Workshop. Instead, direction was provided by City Council for staff to bring back a staff report and resolution adding a Senior Planner position to the Permanent Position Allocation list. The Senior Planner will provide project management for the Mid-Town Area Plan as well as other long-range planning initiatives anticipated in the Development Services workplan in future years.
15 Council Agenda Report- May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Financial Implications: The cost of the Senior Planner position for 5 months through the remainder of Fiscal Year 2022-2023 is $67,042. This amount will be transferred from the existing budget line item Professional Services in the Community Plan account 270-03710-42020 to Payroll accounts. The current full annual cost of the position is $160,901 and will be included in the budget request to City Council in August 2023. Additional budget for the consultant services to assist with various plan preparation items will be requested at a later date upon the Professional Services Agreement approval request.

Environmental Considerations: The proposed action is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) (creation of government funding mechanisms or government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment).

Policy Implications: This proposed personnel change supports the following strategic priorities:
1 Built Environment
Action Item 1.2 – Revitalization of the Mid-Town Area
16 Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2023-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 16, 2023
Authorizing amendment to FY 2022-2023 List of Allocated Permanent Positions regarding adding a Senior Planner

BACKGROUND
A. On March 14, 2023, the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe adopted the 2023-2028 Strategic Plan, which included Priority 1, Built Environment, Action Item

1.2, the revitalization of the Mid-Town area.

B. The adopted Strategic Plan directs the City to prepare an Area Plan for the Bijou/Al Tahoe, Tahoe Sierra Commercial, Bijou Community Park, and Bijou Meadow/Golf Course areas. The Mid-Town Area Plan would provide land use guidance for all future redevelopment and development opportunities in the Mid-Town area.

C. At the April 4, 2023 City Council Meeting, Council directed staff to bring back a staff report and resolution adding a Senior Planner position to the Allocated Permanent Position listing to assit with this effort.

D. The adoption of this resolution establishes the following new classification:

Senior Planner 1 FTE
E. As outlined in the Staff Report there is no immidate additional budget needed.

The current cost of the position is $160,901 and will be included in the budget request to City Council in August 2023.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Resolves that the above recitals are true and a substantive part of this resolution.

2. Authorizes the amendment to the FY 22/23 List of Allocated Permanent Positions (attached hereto as Exh. 1).
17 Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 16, 2023 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
18 Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 21/22 Adopted thru May'22 22/23 Adopted thru May'23 22/23 Budget

CITY COUNCIL
Council Member (Elected) Department Total 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00

CITY CLERK
City Clerk (Elected) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

CITY TREASURER
City Treasurer (Elected) Department Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00

CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Manager 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
Assistant to the City Manager I 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.25
Assistant to the City Manager II 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.25
Communications and Project Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sustainability Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

5.00 5.00 4.25 4.25
Human Resources
Human Resources Manager 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Principal &/or H.R. Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50
Total 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.50 0.00
Department Total 6.00 6.00 6.25 6.75 0.00

CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Risk Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Paralegal 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Director of Finance 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Financial Services
Financial Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I / Payroll Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Principal Management Analyst - Purchasing and Grants 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00
Revenue
Accounting Technician I, II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Supervising Accounting Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00
1 of 4
19 Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 21/22 Adopted thru May'22 22/23 Adopted thru May'23 22/23 Budget

FINANCE DEPARTMENT (CONTINUED)
Information Systems
Information Systems Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Network Systems Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Information Systems Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Department Total 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 0.00

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Director of Development Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Clerk I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Planning
Planning Manager/Environmental Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Planner, Assistant Planner 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Sr. Planner 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.42
Development Services Technician 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Total 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.42 1.00
Housing
Housing Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Planner, Assistant Planner- Housing 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Management Analyst 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Building and Safety
Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pr Bldg & Sr Bldg Inspector, Bldg Inspector, Hsng Insp. 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Sr. Permit Center Technician, Permit Center Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total 8.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 0.00
Department Total 15.00 15.00 16.00 15.42 1.00

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Capital Improvement Projects Manager 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 Capital Program and Facilities Program Manager 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 Office Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Engineering
Construction Engineer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Stormwater Program Coordinator 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Complete Streets Program Manager 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
GIS Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Resident Engineer / Resident Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Civil Engineer, Assistant Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00
2 of 4
20 Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 21/22 Adopted thru May'22 22/23 Adopted thru May'23 22/23 Budget

PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED)
Maintenance Operations / Snow Removal
Maintenance Manager 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lead Maintenance Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Maintenance Technician I, II, III, IV, V 14.00 14.83 16.00 16.00 Total 18.00 18.83 20.00 20.00 0.00
Fleet Maintenance
Maintenance Manager - Fleet 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Equipment Mechanic I, II, III 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Fleet Control Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.00
Airport
Airport Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Technician I, II, III, IV, V 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Department Total 37.00 37.83 39.00 39.00 1.00

PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Director of Parks and Recreation 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation
Administrative Assistant I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Events Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Head Pool Lifeguard 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Total 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00
Parks
Maintenance Manager - Parks 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead Maintenance Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Technicians I, II, III, IV,V 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Total 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Department Total 13.00 13.00 14.00 14.00 0.00

FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Fire Chief / Fire Marshall 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00
Fire Marshall 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Fire Captain 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Fire Engineer 9.00 10.00 10.00 9.00
Firefighter, Paramedic 9.00 8.00 8.00 9.00
Firefighter, Paramedic (SAFER Grant) 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Fire Safety Inspector I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant to the Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Department Total 40.00 40.75 41.00 41.00 0.00
3 of 4
21 Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 21/22 Adopted thru May'22 22/23 Adopted thru May'23 22/23 Budget

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Chief of Police 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Lieutenant 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
Police Sergeant 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Police Officer 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 1.00
Police Officer (cannabis) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Officer (Tobacco grant) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Safety Dispatch Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Records Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Service Officer Supervisor 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Public Safety Dispatcher 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Senior Police Records Tech, Police Record Tech 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Evidence/Prop Tech, Evidence/Prop Tech 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead Community Services Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Sr Community Svcs Officer, Community Svcs Officer 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 Parking Ambassador* 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
Code Compliance Investigator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 65.00 65.00 66.00 68.00 1.00
Total City Employees 200.00 201.58 206.25 208.17 3.00
*Reflects a change from 2 FTEs approved effective 10/1/2022 to 4 FTE approved 2/28/2023 with a partial year for 2 additional FTEs. 4 of 4
22 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 4
Agenda Item: Grant Application to California Tahoe Conservancy for $3.9 Million for Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, Phase 2
Executive Summary: The California Tahoe Conservancy (Conservancy) is an active partner, assisting the Department of Public Works with the development of project plans, arranging for the use of Conservancy-owned properties, and providing essential grant funding to design and construct the Tahoe Valley project. Public Works submitted a grant application on March 3, 2023, requesting up to $3.9 million to fulfill the remaining construction funding gap for Tahoe Valley, Phase 2. The grant does not include a local match contribution requirement.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution ratifying the submission of an implementation grant application to the California Tahoe Conservancy requesting up to $3.9 million for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project (Tahoe Valley), Phase 2, and authorizing the acceptance of the grant funding, and appropriation of the grant funding to the Tahoe Valley, Phase 2 Project.

Responsible Staff Member: Stan Hill, Engineering Manager and Jason Burke, Complete Streets Program Manager
Responsible Staff Member: Stan Hill, Engineering Manager, City Engineer Jason Burke, Complete Streets Program Manager
Reviewed and Approved By:

Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - CTC Grant Application.docx
02-Project Location Map.pdf
03-Resolution - CTC Grant Authorization.doc
23 Council Agenda Report- May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Ratifying Submission of a Grant Application to the California Tahoe Conservancy for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater & Greenbelt Improvement Project, Phase 2 (up to $3.9 million) Location: Tahoe Valley drainage watershed, inclusive to the “Greenbelt” area located behind The Crossing (AKA “factory stores”) at the South Y and the drainage watershed extending between west F Street down to Tahoe Keys Blvd (see Attachment 02 - Project Location Map) Responsible Staff Members: Stan Hill, Engineering Manager/City Engineer (530) 542-6039 Jason Burke, Complete Streets Manager (530) 542-6038
Background: Based on the results of community participation, visioning and planning, enabled under the Regional Plan Town-Center goals, City Council adopted the Tahoe Valley Area Plan on June 2, 2015, which includes the Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project (Tahoe Valley) as a vital community and environmental improvement project. Based on feedback from the public received during the Area Plan process, subsequent design meetings and public survey for the Greenbelt area, the project has been developed to provide the following benefits requested by the community and stakeholders:
 Improved connectivity for bicyclists and pedestrians between neighborhoods and Town Center amenities, including bridges over flooded portions of the trails;  Safety lighting that is dark sky compatible and improves safety for active transportation;  Area-wide stormwater treatment compliance to facilitate commercial and attainable housing development on Area Plan Town-Center parcels;
 Public gathering space for public art and educational signage to provide enhanced amenities for increased residential development in and around the Town-Center;  New community park improvements and features to serve residents and visitors;  New bicycle and pedestrian path connections to the Y area and public gathering space to facilitate private investment on adjacent commercial and residential properties;  Expanded floodplain and Stream Environment Zone (SEZ) riparian habitat to provide for increased climate resiliency; and
 Natural treatment, permeable pavements, and source control to reduce sediment and nutrients carried in urban stormwater runoff, as required by the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and associated Municipal Stormwater Permit.

Due to the size and diversity of the overall project, the City has split the project into two phases in order to secure funding from a variety of eligible and applicable funding sources.

1. Phase 1 consists of stormwater and water quality improvement work within the Bonanza neighborhood and downstream between James Avenue at 3rd Street and Tahoe Keys Blvd.

2. Phase 2 consists of the Central Greenbelt Area (behind the Crossings) spanning between Emerald Bay Road at B Street down to Highway 50 at 4th Street.

Issue and Discussion: On September 6, 2022, City Council accepted a $6,922,904 implementation grant from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and 24 Council Agenda Report- May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 3
Greenbelt Improvement Project. The SWRCB funding and the City’s local match contribution fully funded Tahoe Valley, Phase 1. Over the past year, Public Works has diligently pursued balance of needed construction funding to complete construction of Phase 2.

The California Tahoe Conservancy (Conservancy) has worked closely with Public Works over the past several years to develop the Tahoe Valley project. Conservancy staff have prepared license a agreement to allow the use of Conservancy owned property located within Phase 1 and Phase 2. We have also worked together to maximize opportunities for water quality treatment, riparian habitat revitalization, and expansion of Stream Environment Zone (SEZ) within the Greenbelt area of the project (Phase 2). The Conservancy has provided engineering design funding and construction funding through Proposition 1 and Proposition 68 grant funding support. This most recent proposed grant funding opportunity will assist with adding to the Phase 2 construction budget and moving the Project a little closer to our funding goal.

Financial Implications: Public Works submitted a grant application to the Conservancy on March 3, 2023, for Tahoe Valley, Phase 2 construction funding. Currently, an approximate $4 million construction funding shortfall exists for Tahoe Valley, Phase 2 project. The Engineer’s Estimate for Tahoe Valley, Phase 2 (including a 10% construction contingency) is approximately $7,610,253. Funding acquired to date for construction of Tahoe Valley, Phase 2 is provided within Table 1.

Table 1 – Tahoe Valley, Phase 2 Construction Funding
Funding Source Funding Amount
State Water Resources Control Board, Proposition 1 Implementation Grant $2,353,906 City Local Match Contribution to SWRCB Implementation Grant 249,542 TRPA SEZ and Water Quality Mitigation Funding 74,373
TRPA - Lake Tahoe Restoration Act Grant Program 725,000 City Local Match Contribution to Lake Tahoe Restoration Act Grant Program 145,000 Franchise Utilities - Estimated Reimbursements for Utility Relocations 13,500 Total Secured Phase 2 Construction Funding: $3,561,321
Given the Engineer’s Estimate of $7,610,253 and secured construction funding to date of $3,561,321, the Phase 2 construction shortfall is approximately $4 million. $2,353,906 , 31%
$394,542 , 5%
$74,373 , 1%
$4,048,932 , 51% $725,000 , 10%
Construction Funding Amounts/Sources
State Water Resources Control
Board, Prop. 1 Grant
City Local Match to Grants
TRPA Mitigation Funding
TRPA Lake Tahoe Restoration Act
Grant Program
Unfunded Construction Budget
Need
25 Council Agenda Report- May 16, 2023 Page 3 of 3
The grant application Public Works submitted to the Conservancy is requesting the entire construction funding shortfall. We understand the likelihood of successfully acquiring the entire construction budget shortfall from the Conservancy is slim. However, the City will most likely be awarded at least a healthy portion of the $3.9 million grant funding request. If the City does receive the needed $3.9 million, either through a Conservancy grant or combination of other funding sources, the project will be scheduled for construction in 2024.

Since submitting the Conservancy grant application requesting up to $3.9 million, a small adjustment in the estimated construction funding needs was discovered. The current construction funding shortfall is approximately $4,048,932.

Public Works is requesting City Council authority to accept any amount of grant funding the Conservancy Board awards the City and to authorize the Finance Director to appropriate the construction grant funding to Tahoe Valley, Phase 2. The accompanying resolution includes the requested described authorization to accept and appropriate the Conservancy grant funding, should it be awarded to the City. The proposed Conservancy grant funding does not require a local match contribution.

Environmental Considerations: The Planning Commission adopted the CEQA and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project on May 9, 2019, SCH# 20190292152.

The Project TRPA and Lahontan permitting is completed and ready for construction of the Project improvements.

Policy Implications: Completing project improvements will assist with meeting the sediment and nutrient reductions mandated by the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program. Fulfilling mandated TMDL reduction goals will assist with maximizing residential housing allocations under TRPA Code section

50.5.2.E.2 (Distribution and Administration of Residential Allocations – TMDL Implementation). The Project advances the City Council Strategic Priorities and Goals, specifically:
 Action Item 1.4 (Transportation) to prioritize implementation of mixed-use recreational trails and Class 1 bike trails and closing gaps in the bicycle trail system.  Action Item 2.3 (Connectivity) to facilitate implementation of trail infrastructure prioritizing the connection of bicycle and walking trails, from neighborhoods near the Greenbelt to the South Y commercial area and beyond.
 Action Item 5.3 (Infrastructure and Maintenance) by actively seeking funding to develop sustainable infrastructure projects, based on the prioritized capital improvement project list.

The project will also provide greenhouse gas reduction benefits, providing progress on Action #WB-1 of the 2020 Climate Action Plan: Improve bicycle and pedestrian networks. 26 South Y
Tahoe Valley Storm Water
Improvement Project Area Map
Department of
Public Works -
Engineering Division
Document Path: \\sltpublicworks\public works\GIS files\Projects\Engineering\TahoeValleyGreenbelt\TahoeValleyGreenbeltProjectMap.mxd 12/16/2019 ±
0 500 1,000
Feet
Tahoe Valley Greenbelt Location
Tahoe Valley SWIP Project Boundary
City Boundary
27 28
Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 1
Resolution 2023-XXX
Adopted by City of South Lake Tahoe City Council
May 16, 2023
Ratification of Grant Application, Accept, and Appropriate California Tahoe Conservancy Implementation Grant Funding for the Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project (up to $3.9 million)

BACKGROUND
A. The City of South Lake Tahoe (City) is engaged in a collaborative interagency partnership to meet the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency thresholds and install Best Management Practices for the multibenefit Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project.

B. The Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project (EIP # 01.01.01.0033) is included on the priority list for watershed and water quality improvement projects within the Lake Tahoe basin.

C. Public Works staff submitted a grant application on March 3, 2023, to the California Tahoe Conservancy for implementation funding for the Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project, indicating an approximate $4 Million funding gap for this Project, and seeks City Council ratification for this application.

D. The grant application for CTC implementation grant funding requires, through resolution, the City’s commitment to complete the Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project and commitment to operate and maintain the Project during the useful life of the Project.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Ratifies the grant application for this Project for up to $3.9 Million with no matching funds required.

2. Authorizes and designates the Director Public Works, or designee to sign for, on behalf of the City of South Lake Tahoe, the grant agreement between the California Tahoe Conservancy and the City.

3. Confirms the City’s commitment to the Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project and the City’s commitment to operate and maintain Project improvements throughout the useful life of the Project.

4. Authorizes the acceptance of up to $3.9 million of implementation grant funding from the California Tahoe Conservancy (+) Revenue (33212).

5. Authorizes the Director of Finance to appropriate up to $3.9 million of implementation grant funding from the California Tahoe Conservancy to the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Project (+) Expense (301-40030-48030).

6. Hereby Modifies the Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 as follows:

REVENUE
301-40030 Revenue (33212) – California Tahoe Conservancy (+) Up to $3,900,000

EXPENSE
30140030 Expense (48030) – Tahoe Valley Stormwater & Greenbelt Improvement Project Construction (+) Up to $3,900,000
29 Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 1
Adopted by the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe on May 16, 2023, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
_______________________________ Date: _______________
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council
30 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 5
Agenda Item: Agreements for On-Call Building Inspection and Permit Technician Services with BPR Consulting Group, Willdan Engineering, and 4Leaf, Inc.

Executive Summary: To maintain current service levels while building permitting and inspection services demand is elevated, utilizing consultant staffing support services is necessary. The Council will consider professional services agreements with BPR Consulting Group, Willdan Engineering, and 4Leaf, Inc. to provide as needed building inspection and permit technician services. Total cost for staffing support services would not exceed $120,000.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing the Mayor to execute Professional Services Agreements in a combined total amount not to exceed $120,000 with BPR Consulting Group, Willdan Engineering, and 4Leaf, Inc. for Building Inspector and Permit Technician staffing services.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01 - Staff Report.docx
02 - RFP Building Staffing.pdf
03-Agreement with Willdan.docx
04-Agreement with 4Leaf.docx
05-Agreement with BPR.docx
31 Council Agenda Report- May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Professional Services Agreement for On-Call Building Inspection and Permit Technician Services
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Background: In fiscal year 2021-2022 the Development Services Department experienced a significant increase in building permitting services resulting in an increased need for inspection services expected over the 2023 and 2024 building seasons. The permitting trends over the past six years is reflected in associated revenues shown on the chart below. In addition, the department expects to continue with a high level of permitting demand associated with structural damage experienced over the 2023 winter. Additional staffing support over the 2023 summer will be required to maintain the current level of inspection and permitting service provided by the department.

Issue and Discussion: A Request for Proposals (RFP) was released on March 31, 2023, with proposals due on April 14, 2023. Proposals were received from three consulting firms: 4LEAF, Inc., BPR Consulting Group, and Willdan Engineering. A proposal review committee comprised of city staff panelists reviewed and scored the submittals based on the criteria listed in the RFP. All three proposals received passing scores with high assessments of the ability to provide services.

To ensure availability of support staffing when service demand necessitates it, professional services agreements (PSAs) with all three firms is recommended. Staffing support services from these three firms would be subject to a single umbrella, not to exceed contract amount of $120,000. Individuals proposed by each firm to provide inspection and permit technician services 32 Council Agenda Report- May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 2
will be evaluated for required certifications, experience, and customer service skills before they are authorized to provide services on behalf of the City.

Financial Implications: The proposed staffing support services would be funded with already budgeted funds (10003110 42025) in the Building and Safety Contract Services account.

Environmental Considerations:

Approval of the Professional Services Agreement amendment is not considered a project by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because it does not involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(2) and 15378(b)(4) and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).

Policy Implications:

None.
33 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

BUILDING INSPECTION AND PERMIT

TECHNICIAN SERVICES
RFP # 2023-04-14
34 SUMMARY
The City of South Lake Tahoe is requesting proposals to identify and contract with one or more consultants equipped with proper credentials, experience, insurance, and expertise in performing building inspections and building permit processing to help complement our culture of exceeding customer's expectations.

Proposals are due on or before April 14, 2023 no later than 12:00 p.m. (Pacific Standard Time) at City offices (Development Services 1052 Tata Lane, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150). Proposals received after the deadline will not be accepted. Proposals must be submitted electronically through the planet Bids management system. Hardcopy, faxed and electronic mailed (e-mail) submissions will not be accepted.

Read this RFP document carefully as the award will be given to the highest scoring Proposer or Proposers responding to this RFP. The City of South Lake Tahoe reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to make no award at all, to extend the period for accepting proposals, to advertise the RFP at any time, and to waive any minor irregularities in any proposals.

In the opinion of the City of South Lake Tahoe, this RFP is complete and without need of explanation. However, if you have questions, or should you need any clarifying information, please use the Q&A feature that is found within Planet Bids, where the RFP is posted.

Please note that no information given will be binding upon the City unless such information is issued in writing as an official addendum to this RFP.

TIMELINE OF CRITICAL DATES
Release of RFP 03/31/2023
Deadline for Question Submittal via Planet
Bids
04/07/2023
RFP submittals DUE 04/14/2023
Selection Committee Review Period/Interviews 04/14/2023-05/16/2023 Award Date 05/16/2023
35 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

1. Register with the City
All Proposers must complete a “Vendor Information Sheet” to be entered in the City of South Lake Tahoe Vendor Database, which is required to submit a proposal. Proposers will be notified by the City of any addenda that may be issued to this Request for Proposal (RFP). Proposers must register in the City’s Vendor Database to be notified of such addenda To register, go to: https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/14997/portal-home and follow the instructions applicable to Proposer. Following submission, Proposer will receive a confirmation message within 24 hours from the City. Proposers are solely responsible for maintaining up to date and accurate information in the Vendor Database.

2. Number of Copies
The Proposer must submit a complete proposal as a .pdf file through the PlanetBids electronic bid portal. Proposals not received by the date and time specified in this RFP will be rejected.

Documents submitted in response to this RFP will become the property of the City of South Lake Tahoe and will be regarded as public record under California Public Records Act under Government Code 6250 et seq., and subject to review or release to the public, excluding financial records marked “confidential”.

3. Format
Font, Type and Style: All proposals shall be professionally prepared (no handwritten proposals will be accepted). Documents submitted must be in .pdf format with 8.5” X 11” page size for all narrative. Figures, graphs and tables may be included in 11” X 17” page size if necessary for readability when printed. There are no requirements on font size, type or style requirements.

4. Submittal Deadline
Response to this RFP is due on or before April 14, 2023 no later than 12:00 p.m. (Pacific Standard Time). Reponses received after the deadline will not be accepted; there are no exceptions. Fax and Electronic mailed (e-mail) submission will not be accepted.

5. Selection Process
A Selection Committee consisting of City Staff will evaluate the submitted proposals. Proposer(s) will be objectively evaluated based on their responses to the project scope outlined in this RFP.

The written proposal should clearly demonstrate how the Proposer could best satisfy the requirements of the City. The Selection Committee will utilize the Evaluation Method and Criteria described on page 9 of this RFP to rate and rank each proposal.

If more information is needed following a review of the Proposals, the Selection Committee may invite one or more of the Proposers to a Selection Interview. Upon completion of interviews, (if needed) a recommendation by the Selection Committee to the City Manager/City Council will be made at that time and awarded in accordance with the City of South Lake Tahoe Procurement Policies & Procedures.
36 The City of South Lake Tahoe reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to make no award at all, to extend the period for accepting proposals, to advertise the RFP at any time and to waive any minor irregularities in any proposal.

6. Professional Services Agreement
The Professional Services Agreement with the selected Proposer(s) will begin within 30 days of award of contract. The selected Proposer(s) will be required to sign the City’s Standard Professional Services Agreement. A sample of this Agreement is attached hereto, and the City reserves the right to amend or edit this Agreement however it sees fit.

7. Reservations
a) The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, whether or not minimum qualifications are met, and to modify, postpone, or cancel this Request for Proposal, in whole or in part, or decide to award a contract to perform only some of the services outlined in this Request For Proposal, without liability, obligation, or commitment to any party, firm, or organization.
b) In addition, the City reserves the right to request and obtain additional information from any Proposer and to negotiate the final scope of services with the selected Proposer(s).

The City is not liable for any costs incurred by Proposers prior to issuance of an agreement, contract or purchase order. Costs of developing the proposals, oral presentations or any other such expenses incurred by the Proposer in responding to the RFP are entirely the responsibility of the Proposer and shall not be reimbursed in any manner by the City of South Lake Tahoe.
c) Only the City Council of South Lake Tahoe, or the City Manager after being duly authorized by the City Council, may execute the Agreement with the successful Proposer(s). Further, it is understood that respondents must independently evaluate the information in this RFP and that the City makes no guarantee of data accuracy. d) The City reserves the right to waive or permit cure of minor informalities and/or insignificant mistakes such as matters of form rather than substance and to conduct discussions and negotiations with any qualified respondent in any manner deemed necessary by the City to serve its best interests. The City also reserves the right, based on its sole judgment and discretion, to award a contract based upon the written proposals it receives without conducting discussions, interviews or negotiations. e) If, in the opinion of the City, a proposal contains false or misleading statements or references, it may be rejected without notice to Proposer. f) The City reserves the right to obtain written clarification of any point in a Proposer's proposal or to obtain additional information necessary to properly evaluate a particular proposal. Failure of a Proposer to respond to such a request for additional information or clarification may result in rejection of the proposal. 37 g) The City reserves the right, without qualification, to select a Proposer for further discussions based solely on the content of the RFPs and relevant information obtained from others concerning the respondent's respective records of past performance. h) Proposer agrees that any response submitted to this RFP will remain current and valid for a period of not less than 120 calendar days from the proposal due date.

8. Local Business Preference (applies to RFP’s over $50,000 only) a) The City shall apply a five percent discount to all local businesses which submit proposals for services for The City of South Lake Tahoe. The City shall evaluate the local businesses’ proposals as though the proposal had been submitted at a cost of five percent lower than the cost submitted.
b) Local Business shall mean a business which maintains its principle place of business in fixed office within the City of South Lake Tahoe and possesses a current South Lake Tahoe business license. To establish a principal place of business in South Lake Tahoe, a business must demonstrate the majority of its principals are based in the South Lake Tahoe office, and that it pays South Lake Tahoe payroll taxes on at least 51percent of its total payroll.

INTRODUCTION

1. Background
The purpose of this RFP is to obtain proposals from consultants that can assist with City building permit processing and building inspections through the summer of 2023. The City is seeking to contract for one full time building inspector and one full time permit technician for approximately a six-month period.

2. Objective
The City seeks professional building inspection and permit technician services from consultants with the appropriate customer service, dedication to building relationships, credentials, experience, insurance, and expertise in performing the scope of work described below. 38 SCOPE OF SERVICE

3. Scope of Work to be Performed
Permit Technician
The selected Permit Technician will perform a variety of technical support duties related to the issuance of permits for the Building Division and in support of related services and activities of the Development Services Department. The Permit Technician will provide customer service by phone, email, and at the public counter; perform preliminary review of plans and specifications for plan check submittal; review and processes express permit applications; issue permits, and performs related duties, as needed.

The City is seeking a Permit Technician that can work in the City Development Services Department office a minimum of two days per week and remotely for the remainder of the week for the first month of service. After the first month of service a shift to more remote work may be an option if the selected Permit Technician has become adequately proficient in City processes and it is agreed to by the City and consultant.

Building Inspector
The selected Building Inspector will perform onsite building inspection services covering structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical systems related to the construction or alteration of residential and commercial structures. The inspector will approve acceptable work or indicate in writing corrections necessary to comply with applicable codes and ordinances. The inspector will provide exceptional customer service, assisting builders, architects, contractors and the public to achieve compliance in a friendly and professional manner.

The selected Building Inspector will have necessary ICC certification to perform on-site inspection services during the course of construction to ensure compliance with provisions of the approved plans, Building Code, City Municipal Code and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Code of Ordinances. The selected inspector will work out of the City Development Services Department and receive training on applicable City Municipal Code and TRPA Code of Ordinances regulations at the beginning of the service period, however previous related experience and/or ICC certifications is required prior to the beginning of the service period. 39 PROPOSAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4. Proposal Requirements - All proposals must include the following information and shall be organized as described below.

A. Cover Letter (0-5 points)
The cover letter shall be addressed to the Development Services Director and at a minimum, must contain the following:
• Identification of consultant, including name, address, and telephone number. • Name, title, address, and telephone number of contact person during the period of proposal evaluation.
• A statement to the effect that the proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than 120 calendar days from the date of submittal.
• Signed by a person authorized to bind the Firm to the terms of the proposal.

B. Company History, Background and Experience (0-25 points) Describe the company’s history and organizational structure, including the size of the company, location of office(s) and years in business. Also include the company’s background, experience, and capacity to undertake the project/services for the City of South Lake Tahoe in conformity with the requirements of the RFP. Include three references from other government agency’s where the firm conducted similar work.

C. Scope of Work/Implementation (0-25 points)
Describe the company’s general approach to managing the services provided including an explanation of the methodology to be followed and specific plans to manage, control, and supervise the services to ensure the satisfactory provision of services. In developing the work plan, reference should be made to the specific requirements and specifications noted in the Scope of Services (pages 6-9). Provide a delivery schedule and implementation timeline designed to meet the requirements of the City. Provide a description of implementation considerations, including timeframes and deliverables for various stages.

D. Description of Personnel Qualifications (0-25 points) Proved professional background and qualifications of individuals proposed to complete the scope of work, including experience and demonstrated ability to perform the scope of work. This section must identify the staff who will perform the required work, corresponding resumes and professional licenses.
40 E. Description of the Fees Itemized (0-20 points)
Provide a description of the project cost and/or fees itemized according to the RFP proposal. The total all-inclusive maximum price to be bid must contain all direct and indirect costs, including all out-of-pocket expenses. The City of South Lake Tahoe will not be responsible for the expenses incurred in preparing and submitting the proposal. The company shall present all costs, fees, taxes, and charges based on the achievement of deliverables, which should be outlined in the company’s cost proposal.

The proposal must also provide the following information: name, title, address, email and telephone number of individuals with authority to bind the company and who may be contacted during the period of proposal evaluation. The proposal shall be signed by an official authorized to bind the consultant and shall contain a statement to the effect that the proposal is a firm offer for at least a sixty (60) day period. The execution of the professional services contract is expected to take place in early October 2021. A copy of the City’s standard contract is attached. Company shall be prepared to meet the terms and requirements therein.

EVALUATION METHOD & CRITERIA
Proposals will first be reviewed for responsiveness to the requirements. If any information is missing from the required content, the proposal may be deemed non-responsive and returned to proposer and any further review is subject to the City’s discretion (see Reservations, page 4).

The Selection Committee will make a recommendation based on the criteria in this Proposal to award the contract/agreement to one or more selected Proposer(s). The City may conduct interviews as described on page 4 under Selection Process.

5. Evaluation Criteria
Recommendations for selection will be based on the following weighted criteria of 100 possible points and passing status on all Pass or Fail categories, if any.

Criteria Points
A. Cover Letter 5
B. Company History, Background & Experience 25
C. Scope of Work/Implementation 25
D. Description of Personnel Qualifications 25
E. Description of the Fees Itemized 20
41 ATTACHMENT 1
SAMPLE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
42 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the _________day of ________ 202X by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Kayuga Solution, Inc.(“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, “Scope of Services,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, “Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for _________ years. 43 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant’s compensation, including travel and out-of-pocket expenses, exceed $______ without additional written authorization from City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures.

City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City or Consultant immediately for cause or without cause upon thirty days (30) days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination, and City shall be entitled to all work performed to that date.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.

7. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees 44 and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City.

8. Consultant’s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.
c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be 45 maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City.

Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract, and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’s assigned personnel. Any third party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

10. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
46 b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2)].

11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise.

12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/her duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied.

14. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, 47 actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any subcontractor, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’s work under this Agreement.

15. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all 48 Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on the standard Occurrence form. Claims-Made forms are not
acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by on behalf of Consultant. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.
49 b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a AM Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional
insured’s under Consultant’s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/or work performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant. iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’s insurance policies. 50 The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.

Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant:

Provide a copy to:

17. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation 51 on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

18. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

19. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1094.5, and as provided by law.

20. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

21. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent contractors hired in accordance with Consultant’s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent contractor hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.

For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

22. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 52 23. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (a). b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

24. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly. 53 25. Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures that neither it nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

26. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.

27. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

28. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

29. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

30. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

31. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

32. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
54 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ City Manager Name, Title
Date __________________________ Date _____________________________ Business License # ___________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date ________________________________ City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date ________________________________ City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C - Anti-Lobbying Certification
55 EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
56 EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
BUDGET
Estimated fees (not to exceed) $________
Hourly Rate: $________/hour
Travel and out-of-pocket expenses $________
(travel is included in the TOTAL (not to exceed amount) TOTAL (not to exceed) $________

TIMELINE
57 EXHIBIT C

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty not less than $10,000 and no more than $100,000 for such failure.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; and

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instruction.

Consultant:

Name, Title
By:________________________________________
58 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 16th day of May, 2023 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Willdan Engineering (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, “Scope of Services,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, “Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for one year. 59 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

The total compensation for the project between three vendors, of which Willdan Engineering is one, shall not exceed $120,000 dollars within the term of this agreement without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The City reserves the right to award its total compensation to one bidder or apportion thereof among several bidders as the City may deem to be in its best interest.

Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment.

Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

3. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

4. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

5. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City or Consultant immediately for cause or without cause upon thirty days (30) days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination, and City shall be entitled to all work performed to that date.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.
60 6. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City.

7. Consultant’s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or 61 termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

8. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City.

Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract, and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’s assigned personnel. Any third party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

9. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel 62 independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2)].

10. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise.

11. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/her duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

12. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied. 63 13. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any subcontractor, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’s work under this Agreement.

14. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in 64 accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on
the standard Occurrence form. Claims-Made forms are not acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by on behalf of Consultant. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general
aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual 65 aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a AM Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional
insured’s under Consultant’s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/or work performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each,
except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
66 c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’s insurance policies.

The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

15. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.

Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant: Patrick Johnson
Willdan Engineering
2240 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 270
Roseville, CA 95661

16. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement 67 without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

17. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

18. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1094.5, and as provided by law.

19. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

20. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent contractors hired in accordance with Consultant’s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent contractor hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

21. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s 68 Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

22. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (a). b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

23. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or 69 subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

24. Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures that neither it nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

25. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.

26. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

27. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

28. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

29. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

30. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

31. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
70 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Cristi Creegan, Mayor Patrick Johnson, Principal
Date __________________________ Date _____________________________ Business License # ____________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date ________________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date ________________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C - Anti-Lobbying Certification
71 EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
72 Permitting Services
Willdan understands that we will provide a Permit Technician to perform a variety of technical support duties related to the issuance of permits for the Building Division and in support of related services and activities of the Development Services Department. The Permit Technician will provide customer service by phone, email, and at the public counter; perform preliminary review of plans and specifications for plan check submittal; review and processes express permit applications; issue permits, and performs related duties, as needed. Furthermore, Willdan is prepared to provide a Permit Technician that will work in the City Development Services Department office a minimum of two days per week and remotely for the remainder of the week for the first month of service. At that time the Permit Technician may move to a remote work situation.

Under the supervision of the City, our provided permit technician(s) will provide customer friendly public counter service. Using the City’s permitting software system for plan check tracking, permit issuance and report generation, Willdan provides quick, efficient service at the counter. Our knowledgeable staff, who always understand that this may be the first time that a citizen is applying for a permit, have the ability to help all applicants, from the least knowledgeable applicant for a simple home remodel to experienced owners who have many years of development experience.

Our goal is to make sure that every applicant feels that we have answered their questions and met their needs. The designated permit technician(s) will provide counter services during City Hall hours.

Our building counter services include but are not limited to:

Customer support at the counter and over the phone
Permit application review to ensure completeness and accuracy Fee calculation
Building permit processing and issuance
Public assistance in completing permit applications
Verification that projects have obtained all necessary approvals prior to permit issuance Applicant notification when construction documents and/or permits are ready for pick-up or issuance
Coordination and routing of construction documents to the appropriate City staff for plan review and approval
Resolution of resident inquires and complaints
Records maintenance, document preparation for storage and or imaging Building Inspection Services
Willdan understands that the Building Inspector(s) will perform onsite building inspection services covering structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical systems related to the construction or alteration of residential and commercial structures. The inspector will approve acceptable work or indicate in writing corrections necessary to comply with applicable codes and ordinances. The inspector will provide exceptional customer service, assisting builders, architects, contractors, and the public to achieve compliance in a friendly and professional manner. Willdan’s Building Inspector will work out of the City Development Services Department and receive training on applicable City Municipal Code and TRPA Code of Ordinances regulations at the beginning of the service period. 73 Our inspectors are ICC certified and fully experienced performing residential, commercial, and industrial inspections for compliance with the approved plans and related documents. The inspections will be performed in accordance with the City’s adopted version of the California Building Code, California Residential Code, Green Building Standards Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Electrical Code, and the State and Federal regulations for Accessibility, Noise and Energy Conservation, California Fire Code, and provisions of Title 19 and NFPA.

Inspection staff will be available to meet with City staff, builders, developers, and citizens to provide assistance and resolve any inspection issues that may arise. Inspectors shall attend and participate in required meetings with other City inspection and plan review staff, property owners, contractors and/or design professionals.

Inspectors will review the permit package to verify that the on-site condition is consistent with the appropriate records for square footage, setbacks, heights, and other requirements that may be applicable. Inspectors will comply with the City’s procedures for reporting inspection results, use City inspection correction forms, make appropriate entries onto the permit documents, and follow City procedures prior to finalizing a building permit.

Willdan will verify that all inspection records, including daily records of what was inspected which will be recorded on the job card, and permit copy entered into the City’s Building and Safety computer system.

We will employ such techniques as necessary to minimize delays to builders and provide helpful advice and counsel to builders, owners, engineers, and architects as to enhance the orderly flow of the construction process yet maintaining an effective level of enforcement. Inspectors shall ensure that any construction changes are documented and approved by appropriate City staff.

Our inspection staff are supplied with cell phones and laptops and/or iPads for email communication and document creation and record keeping. Inspections will be provided within 24 hours of notification or sooner.

CASP SERVICES
Willdan can provide CASp certified inspectors to the City as required by California Civil Code, Division 1, Part 2.52, Section 55.53(d)1&2 which reads as follows:
(d) (1) Commencing July 1, 2010, a local agency shall employ or retain at least one building inspector who is a certified access specialist. The certified access specialist shall provide consultation to the local agency, permit applicants, and members of the public on compliance with state construction-related accessibility standards with respect to inspections of a place of public accommodation that relate to permitting, plan checks, or new construction, including, but not limited to, inspections relating to tenant improvements that may impact access. If a local agency employs or retains two or more certified access specialists to comply with this subdivision, at least one-half of the certified access specialists shall be building inspectors who are certified access specialists.
(2) Commencing January 1, 2014, a local agency shall employ or retain a sufficient number of building inspectors who are certified access specialists to conduct permitting and plan check services to review for compliance with state construction-related accessibility standards by a place of public accommodation with respect to new construction, including, but not limited to, projects relating to tenant improvements that may impact access. If a local agency employs or retains two or more certified access specialists to comply with this 74 subdivision, at least one-half of the certified access specialists shall be building inspectors who are certified access specialists.

Our CASp certified inspectors will provide building and site evaluations for ADA and State Disabled Access requirements; provide evaluations and reporting for Applicable Construction Related Accessibility Standards; provide CASp Disability Access Certificates; provide expert witness and legal services support; and provide other services as required by the City. Our CASp certified inspector will be available within 24 hours of notification or sooner.
75 EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
BUDGET
Rates will not increase through June 30, 2024. If the Agreement is extended beyond June 30, 2024, Willdan may reserve the right to increase rates once per year to the value between the 12-month % change of the Consumer Price Index for San Joaquin County area and five percent.

Overtime inspections will be charged a 1.5 factor. Mileage for inspections will be billed at the current IRS Standard Mileage Rate, unless provided with a city vehicle to perform city inspections.

The total compensation for the project between three vendors, of which Willdan Engineering is one, shall not exceed $120,000 dollars within the term of this agreement without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The City reserves the right to award its total compensation to one bidder or apportion thereof among several bidders as the City may deem to be in its best interest.
76 EXHIBIT C

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty not less than $10,000 and no more than $100,000 for such failure.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; and

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instruction.

Consultant:

Patrick Johnson, Principal
By:________________________________________
77 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 16th day of May, 2023 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and 4Leaf, Inc (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, “Scope of Services,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, “Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for one year. 78 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

The total compensation for the project between three vendors, of which 4 Leaf, Inc. is one, shall not exceed $120,000 dollars within the term of this agreement without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The City reserves the right to award its total compensation to one bidder or apportion thereof among several bidders as the City may deem to be in its best interest.

Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment.

Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

3. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

4. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

5. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City or Consultant immediately for cause or without cause upon thirty days (30) days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination, and City shall be entitled to all work performed to that date.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.
79 6. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City.

7. Consultant’s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or 80 termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

8. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City.

Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract, and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’s assigned personnel. Any third party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

9. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel 81 independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2)].

10. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise.

11. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/her duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

12. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied. 82 13. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any subcontractor, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’s work under this Agreement.

14. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in 83 accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on
the standard Occurrence form. Claims-Made forms are not acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by on behalf of Consultant. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general
aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual 84 aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a AM Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional
insured’s under Consultant’s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/or work performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each,
except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
85 c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’s insurance policies.

The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

15. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.

Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant: Kevin Duggan
4LEAF, Inc.
2126 Rheem Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588

16. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement 86 without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

17. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

18. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1094.5, and as provided by law.

19. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

20. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent contractors hired in accordance with Consultant’s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent contractor hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

21. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s 87 Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

22. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
 Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (a).  Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
 Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

23. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or 88 subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

24. Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures that neither it nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

25. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.

26. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

27. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

28. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

29. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

30. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

31. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
89 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Cristi Creegan, Mayor Kevin Duggan, President
Date __________________________ Date _____________________________ Business License # _009764___________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date ________________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date ________________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C - Anti-Lobbying Certification
90 EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
91 Permit Technician Services
Permit Technicians to provide support for the Building Division related to issuance of permits and related services and activities such as providing customer services by phone, email, and at the public counter, performing preliminary review of plans and specifications for plan check submittal, and review and process permit applications.
4LEAF has a proven track record of providing Permit Technician/Counter staff to jurisdictions. The 4LEAF pool of talented professionals includes qualified and experienced permit technicians capable of providing all permit processing and counter services. 4LEAF can deploy such staff on short notice and offer training programs for department staff, if required.

Our staff encompasses the right combination of experience, education, and certifications. 4LEAF Permit Technician Staff must be experienced and dedicated to serving the public at the Planning and Building Department counter.

Typical duties include:
• Accepting plans for plan check
• Verification that plans are accurate and complete
• Calculating permit fees
• Explaining ordinances and procedures to owners, contractors, developers, architects, and general public
• Assisting with preparation of permit applications
• Receiving plans for Planning and Building permits and route to various agencies (if requested) • Accepting complaints on code violations, process, and record complaints • Answering phone calls for field and office staff
• Processing inspection requests
• Maintaining files for building permits
• Operating the Building Department’s computerized information system • Inputting a variety of information, including building permits and inspections • Completing related duties and responsibilities as assigned by Building Official and Senior staff members
Placement Schedule
Building Inspection Services
Field inspections for residential, multi-family residential, commercial, industrial, grading, green building standards, disabled access, floodplain, wildland urban interface fire severity zones, fire protection systems, fire site access, and state housing law title-25 factor-built structures. 92 4LEAF has a team of more than 200 ICC Certified Building Inspectors, OSHPD/DSA Inspectors of Record, Fire Personnel, and Construction Inspectors working on various contracts. 4LEAF has a team committed to work in the Sacramento Area who will remain for the duration of projects to ensure we capture the goals and performance that have made our inspection system successful.

Inspection Placements
Periodic Inspection Services -Available Next Day
4LEAF can fulfill inspection requests immediately upon request including same day. 4LEAF has a wealth of local and available inspectors ready to serve the City. In addition, 4LEAF has a proven track record of providing such services to a number of different building departments.

Part-Time Inspection Services -Available Next Day
4LEAF will provide the City with part-time inspectors upon request. 4LEAF can provide part-time staff within 24 hours of request for any duration of time. 4LEAF’s Project Manager will work closely with the department to identify the right personnel and determine the appropriate work schedule.

Full-Time Inspection Services -Available Two Days or Less 4LEAF can provide full-time inspectors upon request. 4LEAF provides this service regularly to many clients throughout Northern California, including the North Bay, Peninsula/South Bay, East Bay, Sacramento Valley, Central Coast, and Central Valley.

Project Specific Inspection Services -Available Two Days or Less 4LEAF is often tasked with providing inspection services to large projects on behalf of municipalities. 4LEAF currently handles large-scale projects for such clients as the City of Palo Alto, City of Cupertino, etc. These projects are developer funded into a separate City account which is distributed to 4LEAF using a separate invoice and contract number. This is particularly helpful to fast paced projects looking for continuous inspection services over a short period of time (i.e. 6 - 36 Months).

We maintain the largest on-call database of qualified inspectors of varied qualifications for as-needed requests from our clients. 4LEAF utilizes this service for more than 350 municipalities, and we have included a snapshot of our inspection database below for your review. Inspectors vary from current fulltime inspection staff, idle staff (temporarily between assignments), and pre-qualified staff which include inspectors who are available subject to client demand. 4LEAF’s inspectors are all ICC Certified and experienced working within a municipal work environment. 4LEAF will provide inspectors with all the necessary tools, equipment, and current code books sufficient to facilitate all required inspections. 4LEAF can provide interim or full-time inspectors same-day or within one business day—simply call, email, or text our assigned Management team for an immediate response. Our on-call database is utilized for all our clients for as-needed requests.

GoFormz Inspection Technology
93 4LEAF will implement the GoFormz software for inspection requests. With licenses owned by the City, 4LEAF’s Administration team will prepare inspection requests and inspection results documenting construction activity. In addition, 4LEAF will be able to extract information and provide detailed monthly reports detailing the construction activity. The reports will be detailed to identify contractors, subcontractors, work progress, pictures, and a detailed explanation of the field activities.

GoFormz allows every piece of information collected on a project to be accessible by all staff as every form is stored securely and safely in the Cloud. The information can be accessed through a user’s web account where they can view any inspection report and run reports on project data. The information can be accessed through a user’s web account where they can view any inspection report and run reports on project data.

The inspector will be able to leave detailed notes under the inspections and observations box and instantaneously attach pictures to the report to show the item inspected. The inspector will also be able to sign the report by hand on the iPad through the mobile signature block and pictures taken from the iPad are stored on the inspection document.
94 EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
All Rates are Subject to Basis of Charges
Chief Building Official .................................................................................................................. $165/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Inspector/Review .................................................................. $165/hour Inspector of Record ..................................................................................................................... $140/hour OSHPD Inspection/Review ........................................................................................................... $140/hour Senior Combination Building Inspector (Building Inspector III) ................................................... $125/hour Commercial Building Inspector (Building Inspector II) ................................................................ $113/hour Residential Building Inspector (Building Inspector I) .................................................................... $98/hour Fire Inspector II ............................................................................................................................ $125/hour Fire Inspector I ............................................................................................................................. $110/hour Permit Manager ........................................................................................................................... $105/hour Senior Permit/Counter Technician ................................................................................................ $95/hour Permit/Counter Technician ........................................................................................................... $78/hour Clerk/Administrator ...................................................................................................................... $70/hour Hourly overtime charge per inspector…………………………………………………………………………..1.5 x hourly rate GoFormz Software .......................................................................................................... $50/user monthly

BASIS OF CHARGES
Rates are inclusive of “tools of the trade” such as forms, telephones, and consumables. • All invoicing will be submitted monthly.
 Staff Augmentation work (excluding plan review) is subject to 4-hour minimum charges unless stated otherwise. Services billed in 4-hour increments.  4LEAF assumes that these rates reflect the FY2023-2024 contract period. 3% escalation for FY2024-2025 & FY2025-2026 will be assessed per market conditions. • Overtime and Premium time will be charged as follows:
- Regular time (work begun after 5AM or before 4PM) 1 x hourly rate - Nighttime (work begun after 4PM or before 5AM) 1.125 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours M-F or Saturdays) 1.5 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sat or 1st 8 hours Sun) 2 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sun or Holidays) 3 x hourly rate • Overtime will only be billed with prior authorization of the Director or other City personnel. • All work with less than 8 hours rest between shifts will be charged the appropriate overtime rate.
• Mileage driven during the course of Inspections will be charged at cost plus 20%. • Payment due on receipt. All payments over 30 days will be assessed a 1.5% interest charge. • Client shall pay attorneys’ fees, or other costs incurred in collecting delinquent amounts. • Client agrees that 4LEAF’s liability will be limited to the value of services provided.  In accordance with California’s Meal Break and Rest Break Law requirements, Client will be billed one (1) additional hour per day at the regular rate for each missed meal or rest break due to Client-directed tasks or requirements. Client should allow 4LEAF’s non-exempt, 95 hourly employees the opportunity to take their entitled rest and meal breaks during each work shift.
 If 4LEAF is requested or otherwise required to conform to Client’s alternative work week schedule (“AWW”), Client hereby agrees to compensate or reimburse 4LEAF for all overtime paid to its employees who work an AWW.
 If 4LEAF’s affected employment group approves an AWW election and the same is registered, the overtime compensation/reimbursement shall not be required.

BUDGET
The total compensation for the project between three vendors, of which 4Leaf, Inc is one, shall not exceed $120,000 dollars within the term of this agreement without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The City reserves the right to award its total compensation to one bidder or apportion thereof among several bidders as the City may deem to be in its best interest.
96 EXHIBIT C

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty not less than $10,000 and no more than $100,000 for such failure.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; and

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instruction.

Consultant:

Kevin Duggan, President
By:________________________________________
97 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 16th day of May, 2023 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and BPR Consulting Group (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, “Scope of Services,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, “Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for one year. 98 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

The total compensation for the project between three vendors, of which BPR Consulting Group is one, shall not exceed $120,000 dollars within the term of this agreement without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The City reserves the right to award its total compensation to one bidder or apportion thereof among several bidders as the City may deem to be in its best interest.

Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment.

Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

3. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

4. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

5. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City or Consultant immediately for cause or without cause upon thirty days (30) days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination, and City shall be entitled to all work performed to that date.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.
99 6. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City.

7. Consultant’s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or 100
termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

8. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City.

Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract, and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’s assigned personnel. Any third party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

9. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel 101
independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2)].

10. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise.

11. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/her duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

12. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied. 102

13. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any subcontractor, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’s work under this Agreement.

14. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in 103
accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on
the standard Occurrence form. Claims-Made forms are not acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by on behalf of Consultant. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general
aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual 104
aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a AM Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional
insured’s under Consultant’s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/or work performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each,
except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
105
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’s insurance policies.

The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

15. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.

Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant: Bill Rodgers
BPR Consulting Group
2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762

16. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement 106
without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

17. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

18. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1094.5, and as provided by law.

19. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

20. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent contractors hired in accordance with Consultant’s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent contractor hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

21. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s 107
Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

22. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (a). b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

23. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or 108
subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

24. Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures that neither it nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

25. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.

26. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

27. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

28. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

29. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

30. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

31. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
109
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Cristi Creegan, Mayor Bill Rogers, Principal
Date __________________________ Date _____________________________ Business License # ___012243_________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date ________________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date ________________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C - Anti-Lobbying Certification
110

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
111
Permit Technician Services
 BPR’s Permit Technician will perform a variety of technical support services in support of the issuance of permits for the Building Division and additional services as requested of the Development Services Department.
 BPR’s Permit Technician will be available to provide customer service via phone, email, and at the public counter. Duties will include providing preliminary review of plans and specifications for plan check submittal; reviewing and processing of express permit applications; issuing permits, and other related duties.  BPR will provide a Permit Technician, ideally locally based, that can work in the City Development Services Department office at least two days per week and remotely for the remainder of the week. After the first month of service, working remote may be an option provided the assigned Permit Technician has become adequately proficient in the City’s processes and both the City and BPR’s Project Manager is in agreement with remote work.

Permit Technician Services
Knowledgeable and personable permit technicians are the first impression the public gets of your building department, and they play a critical role as to how your department’s services are perceived. Permit technician services are crucial to the success of the entire building safety workflow within building departments. The ability to convey proper information to permit applicants, properly calculate permit fees, properly route plans to various departments for review, tracking approvals, database management and permit issuance are all critical functions. We understand that the ability to deliver excellent customer service, maintaining a smooth flow of permit documents throughout departments, and maintaining accurate and up-to-date records, are all key elements to furnishing first-rate, efficient success of your building department. BPR permit technicians are skilled at and experienced in working both remotely and on-site to deliver quality permitting services.

Our Permit Technicians will greet and work closely with the customers at the public counter or via telephone, answering questions and providing accurate information. Our Permit Technicians will provide information about permit applications, plan review and inspection requirements, will be organized and have the ability to maintain filing systems necessary for tracking permit applications, permits issued, plan checks in progress, approved project documents and any other records or information important to the efficient operation of your department.

Due to the unknown start date and specific assignment duration, BPR will strive to identify locally based permit technician staff to provide the requested services. Upon selection, BPR will immediately run a local recruitment ad to identify locally based and qualified permit technician applicants to minimize travel related costs to the City. Pending our ability to identify locally based candidates, an appropriately qualified staff member will be assigned to provide the requested permit technician services. During the course of the assignment, our Project Manager will communicate with our assigned permit technician and the City’s counter supervisor or other designated staff on a regular basis to ensure all services being provided are meeting the needs and expectations of the City. If concerns are expressed related to our permit technician's performance, our project manager will immediately engage with our assigned permit technician to correct any identified performance related issues.

Building Inspector Services
112
 BPR’s Building Inspector will perform onsite building inspection services including structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical inspections related to the construction or alteration of residential and commercial structures.
 BPR’s Inspector will approve acceptable work or indicate in writing any corrections necessary in order to comply with applicable codes and ordinances.  BPR’s Inspector will always provide exceptional customer service and assist builders, architects, contractors and the public in achieving compliance in a customer focused manner.
 BPR will only provide inspectors that possess the necessary and City required ICC certifications to perform on-site inspection services.
 Inspectors will inspect structures to ensure compliance with provisions of the approved plans, Building Code, City Municipal Code and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Code of Ordinances.
 BPR’s Building Inspector will work out of the City’s Development Services Department and complete training on applicable City Municipal Codes and TRPA Code of Ordinance regulations prior to performing inspections for the City.  BPR is confident that we can provide the requested Building Inspection and Permit Technician services in an efficient and professional manner. Below you will find additional details on our approach, methodology and implementation.

Building Inspection Services
BPR building inspectors are qualified and appropriately ICC-certified to provide the requested inspection services. Assigned building inspectors will have experience and be familiar with local ordinance requirements along with construction methods associated with high wind and snow load requirements associated with building in Climate Zone 16. Our inspection staff will perform inspection services to verify that the work of construction is in conformance with the approved project plans as well as identifying issues of non-compliance with applicable building codes. Our field inspection services will include inspection of all portions of projects including project sites as applicable. Our building inspectors will write legible and understandable correction notices, field reports, and will be available to answer in-person, emailed, or telephone inquiries. All inspection personnel assigned will be ICC and/or CASp certified as required. We will work diligently to select and assign locally based inspectors to provide the requested services.

We understand that many municipalities have amended code sections, policies and ordinances that impact the work that is inspected and shown on approved project plans. Our inspection staff will familiarize themselves with local requirements to ensure that the projects we are inspecting are compliant with local and current code requirements. Specifically, we will ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of the Title 24 California Building Standards Code, Parts 1 through 12, covering structural, fire prevention, life safety, disabled access, energy conservation, green building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical installations in residential, commercial, industrial, existing and historical buildings. BPR’s ICC/CASp certified inspectors have performed building inspection services on a wide variety of construction projects including master planned developments, single-family production, custom homes, commercial, manufacturing, institutional, assembly, essential service, industrial projects and historically designated buildings. When necessary for large or fast-paced projects, multiple inspectors can be made available. BPR’s inspectors will inspect projects to verify conformance with approved project drawings and specifications which will include review of the permit documents to 113
verify that onsite conditions are consistent with the approved documents for size, setbacks, heights and other applicable requirements. At the completion of inspections, BPR’s inspectors will update database information, complete necessary forms and documents as required to provide seamless service.

Inspector Qualifications & Certifications
BPR will work with you to select appropriately qualified inspectors with applicable experience and specific code knowledge based on the types of projects assigned for inspection. All BPR Consulting Group inspectors are ICC-certified with many maintaining CASp certification. In addition, BPR employs OSHPD certified inspectors available for inspection of OSHPD designated facilities.

Inspection personnel will have the ability to read, understand and interpret construction plans, truss drawings and calculations, prepare and maintain accurate records and reports, communicate effectively orally and in writing and to work effectively with contractors, permit applicants, homeowners and City staff. Inspectors will possess knowledge of approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety used in building inspection and the most current building standards. Our inspectors are familiar with most of the common scheduling and tracking systems utilized by building departments and can quickly adapt to your systems and requirements.

Due to the unknown start date and specific assignment duration, BPR will strive to identify locally based inspection staff to provide the requested services. Upon selection BPR will immediately run a local recruitment ad to identify locally based and qualified inspector applicants to minimize travel related costs to the City. Pending our ability to identify locally based candidates, an appropriately qualified staff member will be assigned to provide the requested inspection services. During the course of the assignment our project manager will communicate with our assigned inspector and the City’s inspection supervisor or other designated staff on a regular basis to ensure all services being provided are meeting the needs and expectations of the City. If concerns are expressed related to our inspector’s performance, our Project Manager will immediately engage with our assigned inspector to correct any identified performance related issues.

TRPA Inspection Services
Assigned inspectors will be familiar with TRPA mitigation measures and as requested will verify that appropriate TRPA mitigation measures identified on the approved project plans are in place during construction. Additionally, at completion of construction our inspectors, as part of their final inspection, will verify that all TRPA compliance measures as identified on the approved project plans are in place.

Our building inspectors will immediately contact the Building Official if it is observed that TRPA measures that in the opinion of the inspector should be in place but have not been installed or were not included on the approved project plans prior to approving projects. 114

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
115
BUDGET
INSPECTION SERVICES: We will provide the requested inspection services using appropriately experienced and qualified candidates utilizing the hourly rates listed in our Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates. There will be a minimum 8-hour daily inspection charge for all on-site inspection services.

PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: We will provide the requested permit technician services using appropriately experienced and qualified candidates utilizing the hourly rates listed in our Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates. There will be a minimum 8-hour daily inspection charge for all on-site or remote permit technician services.

SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
The rates displayed in the schedule below reflect BPR’s current hourly billing rates.

CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE
CASp Certified Building Inspector ..................................................................................................... 115 ICC Certified Inspector ...................................................................................................................... 100 Permit Technician ............................................................................................................................... 75 Overtime: Inspection services and other hourly services provided in excess of eight hours per day, nights, and weekends will be charged at 125% of the billing rates indicated above. Mileage: Vehicle mileage utilized in the performance of inspection services will be billed at the current IRS vehicle mileage rate.
Commute Mileage: Mileage for BPR staff to travel from out of area locations to the City of South Lake Tahoe will not be billed to the city.
Locally based versus regionally based staff: Due to the challenges of identifying qualified and locally based staff for the requested short-term assignments, there will be an additional $35 per hour surcharge for assigned on-site staff whose permanent residence is located more than 40 miles from the City of South Lake Tahoe’s city limits. There will be no additional surcharge for services provided remotely.

The total compensation for the project between three vendors, of which BPR Consulting Group is one, shall not exceed $120,000 dollars within the term of this agreement without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The City reserves the right to award its total compensation to one bidder or apportion thereof among several bidders as the City may deem to be in its best interest.

EXHIBIT C
116

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty not less than $10,000 and no more than $100,000 for such failure.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; and

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instruction.

Consultant:

Bill Rogers, Principal
By:________________________________________
117
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 6
Agenda Item: Donation Acceptance - Bijou Skate Park
Executive Summary: Methodology, Inc. fundraised for the Bijou Skate Park and is donating $15,445 for acceptance by the City Council to use toward future construction needs of the skate park.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a resolution accepting a donation from Methodology Inc. in an amount of $15,445 for use in the Bijou Skate Park.

Responsible Staff Member, Kelley Edwards, Recreation Manager Responsible Staff Member: Kelley Edwards, Recreation Manager Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Bijou Skate Park Donation.docx
02-Resolution_Donation Bijou Skate Park.docx
03-Skate Park Donation Proposal.pdf
04-Donation Approval Form Bijou Skate Park.pdf
05-Donation Acknowledgment Letter Bijou Skate Park.pdf
118
Council Agenda Report- May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Donation Acceptance - Bijou Skate Park
Location: Parks and Recreation Department, Bijou Skate Park Responsible Staff Member: Kelley Edwards, Recreation Manager 530-542-6059 Background: On September 6, 2022, City Council adopted a new financial policy to establish a process for soliciting and accepting contributions, donations, and sponsorships in a manner consistent with Government Accounting Standards as well as the City’s’ values, priorities, and the Strategic Plan.

Issue and Discussion: In Spring 2023, Methodology Inc. contacted City staff to request donating to support new construction at the Bijou Skate Park. Methodology Inc. submitted a completed donation approval form in the amount of $15,445.

Financial Implications: The accompanying resolution authorizes the City to accept the donation from Methodology Inc. in an amount of $15,445 for use in the Bijou Skate Park appropriated to the Bijou Skate Park CIP project account 301-60075-48030.

Environmental Considerations: The proposed action does not constitute approval of a project under the California Environmental Quality Act because it does not commit the City to a course of action regarding the project (CEQA Guidelines section 15352(a)).

Policy Implications: Item supports Strategic Priority 2, Recreation and Equitable Access, and Priority 1, Built Environment.
119
Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 1
Resolution 2023-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 16, 2023
Authorizing Acceptance of $15,445 Cash Donation from Methodology Inc.

Designated for New Construction at the Bijou Skate Park

BACKGROUND
A. On September 6, 2022 City Council adopted a new financial policy to establish a process for soliciting and accepting contributions, donations, and sponsorships in a manner consistent with Government Accounting Standards and City’s values, priorities, and the Strategic Plan.

B. On April 5, 2023 Methodology Inc. submitted a donation proposal in the amount of $15,445 designated for new construction at the Bijou Skate Park.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorizes the City to amend FY 22/23 budget and accept Methodology Inc. donation in the amount of $15,445 into the Bijou Skate Park Capital Improvement Project accounts 301- 60075-36280 (Contributions and Donations) and 301-60075-48030 (Construction) designated for new construction at the Bijou Skate Park.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 16th, 2023 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
120
From: Pat Moore
To: Lori Marino
Cc: Kelley Edwards; Jim Marino
Subject: Re: Skate Park Donation
Date: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 2:40:31 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Lori!
Sorry for my delay, your email found its way into my junk box. I will get the check out asap and here is the information. Please let me know if you have any other questions! Also The Hangar would like to make a donation as well, if its ok with you I can send an introduction email to Nate Riffle the owner.

Name of Donor/ address/ City/ State/ zip:

Methodology Inc. PO Box 1383, Zephyr Cove, NV 89448
Total amount of Donation:
$15,445
Intended Use:

For new construction at the Bijou Skatepark.

Are there any conditions that they city should be aware of in accepting these funds? To be used for new construction of the Bijou Skatepark.

On Mar 28, 2023, at 12:02 PM, Lori Marino <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Pat,
Thank you for your support of the Bijou Skatepark! The city appreciates donations to help improve community recreation. We can accept both cash or check written to the City of South Lake Tahoe. You can drop cash/check off at our Revenue Department or mail a check to the address listed below. We have a form that we fill out, and it will be approved by City Council since the donation is over $10,000. Did you want to make this a public donation, meaning City Council will thank you or your organization at the City Council meeting, or did you want to be anonymous? Let us know your preference and we will fill out the form accordingly. We will need the following information for our Donation Approval Form:

Name of Donor/ address/ City/ State/ zip:
121
Total amount of Donation:

Intended Use:

Are there any conditions that they city should be aware of in accepting these funds? City of South Lake Tahoe
Revenue Department
1901 Airport Road
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attn: Lori Marino
Thank you,
Lori Marino
Principal Management Analyst
Finance Department
(530) 542-7410
[email protected]
<image001.png>
This is a verified communication from the City of South Lake Tahoe. If you suspect that this message was not sent from a verified source, contact the City of South Lake Tahoe IT department at [email protected]
122
123
124
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 7
Agenda Item: Sugar Pine Village – 2020/2021 HOME Investment Partnerships Program Executive Summary: The Sugar Pine Village project is a proposed 248-unit affordable housing project, with onsite community service facilities on 11.6 acres. On February 15, 2022 the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-022, authorizing submittal of a HOME application for Phase 1B in an amount not to exceed $6,375,000. In March 2022 HOME applications were submitted by the City and Related for Phase 1B and 2B funding. The City has been notified of a $5,910,614 award for Phase 2B and Related has been notified of a $5,162,446 award for Phase 1B. To accept the City award, Resolution 2022-022 needs to be modified to reference Phase 2B rather than 1B.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit and accept an application for HOME Investment Partnership Program funds for Sugar Pine Village Phase 2B.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - SPV HOME2B.docx
02-Res 2022-022 Sugar Pine Village HOME Investment Program.pdf 03-Reso Modifying Reso 2022-022.docx
125
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Sugar Pine Village – 2020/2021 HOME Investment Partnerships Program Application Location: 1860 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 1029 Tata Lane
Responsible Staff Member: Zach Thomas, Housing Manager (530) 542-7400 Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services
(530) 542-6024
Background: The Sugar Pine Village project is a proposed 248-unit affordable housing project, with onsite community service facilities on 11.6 acres of land owned by the State of California and managed by the California Tahoe Conservancy (Conservancy). This project is a result of the Governor’s Executive Order N06-19, which directed the California Department of General Services (DGS) to identify excess state properties as potential affordable housing development sites. Based on a collaborative effort underway to address housing affordability in Tahoe, the Conservancy is partnering with DGS and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to develop housing at 1860 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 1029 Tata Lane. In July 2020, the Conservancy announced the State had selected Related Companies of California LLC in partnership with the St. Joseph Community Land Trust to construct and manage the Sugar Pine Village project.

Since June 2020, the City of South Lake Tahoe has been an active partner in the development of the project. The City has contributed $566,629 loan of RDA Program Income funds for predevelopment costs (Resolution 2020-109) and a $1,250,000 loan to purchase banked land coverage from the airport (Resolution 2020-110). Most recently, the City Council at its October 19, 2021 meeting also authorized a $627,626 loan of HOME Program Income. This brings the City’s total commitment toward the project to $2,444,255. The project has secured over $100 million in tax credit equity and grant funds utilizing the City’s contribution as local leverage. Phase 1A is fully funded and construction began in 2022 with site preparation and modular unit construction. Phase 2A has recently been awarded PLHA and IIG funding and final financing of that phase is anticipated in August 2023.

On November 17th, 2020, the City Council committed to work with Related California and the Sugar Pine Village project team to prepare a project application to HCD for HOME funding made available by the State of California upon release of the next HOME NOFA (Resolution 2020-110). 126
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 3
Issue and Discussion: On February 15, 2022 the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-022, authorizing submittal of a HOME application for Phase 1B in an amount not to exceed $6,375,000. In March 2022 HOME applications were submitted by the City and Related for Phase 1B and 2B funding. The City has been notified of a $5,910,614 award for Phase 2B and Related has been notified of a $5,162,446 award for Phase 1B. To accept the City award, Resolution 2022-022 needs to be modified to reference Phase 2B rather than 1B. A revised resolution is attached.

Financial Implications: The attached resolution will amend previous City Council authorization to apply for the 2020/2021 HOME Investment Partnership Program funding to specify Phase 2B rather than 1B. HOME grant funds are awarded on a competitive basis and the City has been notified of successfully receiving a HOME loan commitment for the Sugar Pine Village project Phase 2B. If adopted, the resolution will authorize the City Manager to sign the award letter and execute a standard agreement to accept the funding. HCD will generate the standard agreement to secure the award once all funding sources for Phase 2B, including tax credits, have been documented as “committed.”
It is anticipated that the City will carry primary responsibility for grant administration and monitoring.

Environmental Considerations: For projects that satisfy criteria specified by SB 35, the guidelines issued by HCD specify that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to actions taken by a local government to provide financial assistance to a development that receives streamlined approval and that is to be used for housing for persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.

Source Phase 1A Phase 1B Phase 2A Phase 2B
City RDA Loan 566,629 - -
City Coverage Loan 254,487 995,513
HOME PI Loan 625,000
City Sources 821,116 625,000 995,513 -
Federal Tax Credit Equity 19,766,293 23,997,600 17,502,953 23,997,600 State Tax Credit Equity 5,722,864 2,395,276 6,801,591 2,399,760 Perm Loan 2,768,500 2,045,000 2,392,000 1,959,000
State MHP 12,127,500 7,448,016 - 11,236,042
State AHSC - - 10,551,967
State IIG 3,195,900 2,998,500 2,965,000 2,998,000
State PLHA 4,750,000 - 4,750,000
State HOME - 5,162,446 - 5,910,614
State LGMG 5,638,066 5,000,000 4,304,935 5,000,000
Deferred Developer Fee 500,000 500,000
Leveraged Sources 54,469,122 49,046,838 49,768,446 53,501,016 Total Sources 55,290,238 49,671,838 50,763,959 53,501,016 Committed Identified
127
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 3 of 3
Policy Implications: The recommended actions are consistent with the City Strategic Plan which identifies supporting the Sugar Pine Village Project as Action Item 1.3.2.

The recommended action is also consistent with the following adopted policies and programs:

City General Plan Housing Element
Policy 1-1 The City shall adopt programs, ordinances, incentives, land use plans and other regulatory mechanisms that provide opportunities for the private sector to address the housing needs of citizens of all economic levels.

Policy 2-2 The City shall enable opportunities for deed-restricted affordable ownership housing to ensure long-term affordability.

Policy 2-5 The City shall recognize that it will become difficult to attract employees if they cannot afford to purchase or rent housing in South Lake Tahoe. The City shall encourage and support programs and activities that create a robust local economy that provides residents with good paying employment and the means to purchase and/or rent housing in the city.

Program 2-1 PURSUE STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDS
To support the creation of quality, affordable housing options for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households, the City shall seek and when appropriate and feasible pursue grant opportunities for state and federal funds.

Program 2-6 ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL AND STATE LANDS
The City shall continue discussing the potential for developing quality workforce and affordable housing on non-environmentally sensitive lands owned by the California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC) and the United States Forest Service (USFS). The City shall ensure that important natural resources are protected and only pursue surplus lands that these agencies have determined do not have a clear and compatible conservation or recreation purpose consistent with agency goals.

Tahoe Valley Area Plan
Policy H-1.1 – Housing Options
Provide for a range of housing options that include affordable, moderate-income, and workforce housing so that people can live and work in the City.

Policy H-1.5 – Redirection of Development
Direct high density residential development to areas of Tahoe Valley that are within walking distance of public transit and services.

Policy H-1.7 – Tahoe Livable Communities Program
Collaborate and support efforts of the California Tahoe Conservancy to remove blighted properties and repurpose associated development commodities. Encourage the use of residential commodities for affordable housing in Tahoe Valley area.

Policy H-2.1 – General
Encourage the creation of residential uses to support and add vitality to commercial and public service projects in the Tahoe Valley area.
128

GOVERNING BOARD RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-022

THE GOVERNING BOARD OF
The City of South Lake Tahoe
HEREBY AUTHORIZES: Submission of the 2020/ 2021 HOME Investment Partnerships Program application to the California State Department of Housing and Community Development for funding in the amount of $ 6,375,000; and if awarded, the execution of a standard agreement, any amendments thereto, and other related documents necessary to participate and comply with in the HOME Investment Partnerships Program.

WHEREAS:

A. The California Department of Housing and Community Development ( the Department”) is authorized to allocate HOME Investment Partnerships Program (“ HOME”) funds made available from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“ HUD”). HOME funds are to be used for the purposes set forth in Title II of the Cranston- Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, in federal implementing regulations set forth in Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 92, and in Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations commencing with section 8200.

B. On December 1st, 2021, the Department issued a Notice of Funding Availability announcing the availability of funds under the HOME program ( the “NOFA”).

C. In response to the 2020/2021 HOME NOFA, The City of South Lake Tahoe a municipal corporation ( the “Applicant”), wishes to apply to the Department for, and receive an allocation of, HOME funds.

IT IS THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT:

1. In response to the 2020/2021 HOME NOFA, the Applicant shall submit an application to the Department to participate in the HOME program and for an allocation of funds not to exceed six-million three- hundred and seventyfive thousand Dollars ($ 6,375,000) for the following activities and/or programs:

Development of 60-unit Phase 1B of the 248-unit Sugar Pine Village affordable housing project. The project will deed restricted as affordable to household earning between 30% and 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). Phase 1B will have an average affordability level of 49% AMI. The project will be located on 11.6 acres of land owned by the State of California and managed by the California Tahoe Conservancy. The project is a result of the Governor’s Executive Order N-06-19, which directed the California Department of General Services (DGS) to identify excess state properties as potential affordable housing sites.
129

2. If the application for funding is approved, then the Applicant hereby agrees to use the HOME funds for eligible activities in the manner presented in its application as approved by the Department in accordance with the statutes and regulations cited above. The Applicant may also execute a standard agreement, any amendments thereto, and any and all other documents or instruments necessary or required by the Department or HUD for participation in the HOME program ( collectively, the required documents).

3. The applicant authorizes The City Manager or his/her designee( s) to execute, in the name of the applicant, the required documents.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: _ 4__ NAYS: _ 0_ ABSTAIN: __ 0 ABSENT:_ 1___
The undersigned City Clerk of the applicant does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the governing board of the applicant passed and adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date set forth above, and said resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Date
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.

Feb 16, 2022
130
Res 2022-022 Sugar Pine Village HOME
Investment Program
Final Audit Report 2022- 02-16
Created: 2022- 02-16
By: jo Mcdonough ( jmcdonough@cityofslt. us)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAfgADXCYRdivF2B2Xu4juVVWPkeRmB2qY Res 2022-022 Sugar Pine Village HOME Investment Program" History
Document created by jo Mcdonough ([email protected]) 2022- 02- 16 - 9:58:52 PM GMT- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document emailed to Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) for signature 2022- 02- 16 - 9:59:50 PM GMT
Email viewed by Sue Blankenship ( sblankenship@cityofslt. us) 2022- 02- 16 - 10:04:13 PM GMT- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document e-signed by Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2022- 02-16 - 10:04:30 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Agreement completed.
2022- 02- 16 - 10:04:30 PM GMT
131

GOVERNING BOARD RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX

THE GOVERNING BOARD OF
The City of South Lake Tahoe
HEREBY AUTHORIZES: Submission of the 2020/2021 HOME Investment Partnerships Program application to the California State Department of Housing and Community Development for funding in an amount not to exceed $6,375,000; and if awarded, the execution of a standard agreement, any amendments thereto, and other related documents necessary to participate and comply with in the HOME Investment Partnerships Program.

WHEREAS:

A. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (the “Department”) is authorized to allocate HOME Investment Partnerships Program (“HOME”) funds made available from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). HOME funds are to be used for the purposes set forth in Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, in federal implementing regulations set forth in Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 92, and in Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations commencing with section 8200.

B. On December 1st, 2021, the Department issued a Notice of Funding Availability announcing the availability of funds under the HOME program (the “NOFA”).

C. In response to the 2020/2021 HOME NOFA, The City of South Lake Tahoe a municipal corporation (the “Applicant”), wishes to apply to the Department for, and receive an allocation of, HOME funds.

IT IS THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT:

1. In response to the 2020/2021 HOME NOFA, the Applicant shall submit an application to the Department to participate in the HOME program and for an allocation of funds not to exceed six-million three-hundred and seventy-five thousand Dollars ($6,375,000) for the following activities and/or programs:

Development of 60-unit Phase 2B of the 248-unit Sugar Pine Village affordable housing project. The project will deed restricted as affordable to household earning between 30% and 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). Phase 2B will have an average affordability level of 49% AMI.

The project will be located on 11.6 acres of land owned by the State of California and managed by the California Tahoe Conservancy. The project is a result of the Governor’s Executive Order N-06-19, which directed the California Department of General Services (DGS) to identify excess state properties as potential affordable housing sites.
132

2. If the application for funding is approved, then the Applicant hereby agrees to use the HOME funds for eligible activities in the manner presented in its application as approved by the Department in accordance with the statutes and regulations cited above. The Applicant may also execute a standard agreement, any amendments thereto, and any and all other documents or instruments necessary or required by the Department or HUD for participation in the HOME program (collectively, the required documents).

3. The applicant authorizes The City Manager or his/her designee(s) to execute, in the name of the applicant, the required documents.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS ________ DAY OF __________ 20__, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES:_____ NAYS:_________ ABSTAIN:________ ABSENT:________ The undersigned City Clerk of the applicant does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the governing board of the applicant passed and adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date set forth above, and said resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.
_________________________________ ________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Date
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
133
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 8
Agenda Item: Acceptance of Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant from CalRecycle for $70,000 and Agreement with Clean Tahoe for Homeless Encampment Cleanups Executive Summary: On January 24, 2023, City Council approved staff to submit a grant application to The Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant Program pursuant to Section 48100 of the Public Resources Code. Staff submitted the application on February 2, 2023. The purpose of the grant is to clean up and abate illegally dumped material on property owned by innocent parties. This program allowed the City to apply for funds for existing illegal disposal sites based on determination by the City in collaboration with the Clean Tahoe Program. On April 14, 2023, the City received a grant Award in the amount of $70,000.00 to allow the Clean Tahoe Program to enhance and expand the cleanup efforts of homeless encampments throughout the South Lake Tahoe area.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution accepting a grant award in the Amount of $70,000 through the CalRecycle Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant Pilot Program and authorizing and directing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Clean Tahoe to enhance and expand the cleanup efforts of homeless encampments throughout the South Lake Tahoe area.

Responsible Staff Member: Lori Marino, Principal Management Analyst Responsible Staff Member: Lori Marino, Principal Management Analyst, (530) 542-7410 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Cal Recycle Grant Award.docx
02-Resolution - CalRecycle Grant Acceptance.docx
03-Clean Tahoe Agreement.docx
134
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: CalRecyle Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant Acceptance
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Lori Marino, Principal Management Analyst (530) 542- 7410 Background: On January 24, 2023, City Council approved staff to submit a grant application to The Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant Program pursuant to Section 48100 of the Public Resources Code. Staff submitted the application on February 2, 2023. The purpose of the grant is to clean up and abate illegally dumped material on property owned by innocent parties.

This program allowed the City to apply for funds for existing illegal disposal sites based on determination by the city in collaboration with the Clean Tahoe Program. After grant award, but prior to cleanup, the grantee will upload specifics regarding the site remediation. This allows CalRecycle to assess each site location individually before any cleanup costs can be incurred.

On April 14, 2023, the City received a grant Award in the amount of $70,000.00 to allow the Clean Tahoe Program to enhance and expand the cleanup efforts of homeless encampments throughout the South Lake Tahoe area.

Issue and Discussion: The item before City Council is to accept the grant award, appropriate the budget and authorize the City Manager to enter into an Operational Agreement with Clean Tahoe to implement the project and be a sub-recipient of the grant funds. The grant funds will allow timely abatement of homeless encampments and help bridge the multi- jurisdictional challenges in the clean-up effort. Last year, Clean Tahoe abated fourteen encampments within the South Lake Tahoe area. Camps vary in size, usually presenting on river banks or in meadows potentially filtering water directly into Lake Tahoe. Police Department staff will work with the Clean Tahoe Program to coordinate the sites, work with various land managers, and with offering services to inhabitants of encampments prior to eviction. Regardless of landowner, the camp will be identified, evicted, and the abatement will begin within 10 days of eviction. This agreement will allow Clean Tahoe to utilize the grant funds for this timely cleanup of encampments. Expedient abatement will deter bears and other wildlife from accessing food trash, and other materials in encampments, as well as providing health, safety, and environmental benefits to the area.

Financial Implications: There were no matching funds required for this grant program. Grant funds are paid in arrears on a reimbursement basis; withholding 10% retention until all grant requirements are met and final invoice and reporting is submitted and approved. Through implementation of the Operational Agreement; Clean Tahoe will submit invoices to the City for the abatement measures; the City will pay Clean Tahoe with budgeted city funds, and the City will be 135
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 2
reimbursed from CalRecycle through the grant. Funds should be appropriated into the budget as follows:

Account Number: 241 03801
Revenue: 33243: $70,000
Expenses: 42010: $70,000
Environmental Considerations: The resolution authorizing the grant award is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land), and 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment).

Policy Implications: Per Financial Management- Grant Funding and Compliance Policy approved by City Council on Sept. 8, 2020; section 3.2 City Council Approval to Accept Award: City Council approval to accept an award and appropriate budget is required for ALL Grant Awards. A detailed staff report and a resolution (if required) should be brought forth to City Council for Council approval/adoption.
136
Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2023-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 16, 2023
Accepting Grant Award in the amount of $70,000 through the CalRecycle Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Pilot Program

BACKGROUND
A. Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs (grants) in furtherance of the State of California’s (state) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the state thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety and the environment.

B. In furtherance of this authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management of the grants.

C. CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant’s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants.

D. Per approved Resolution 2021-004 City Council provided authorization for submittal of an application to CalRecycle for said funding.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorizes the acceptance of a Grant Award in the amount of $70,000 through the CalRecycle Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Pilot Program;

2. Certifies that the City Manager, or his/her designee is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of South Lake Tahoe all grant documents, including but not limited to, agreements, amendments and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project;

3. Certifies the City Manager may authorize an Operational Agreement with the Clean Tahoe Program to perform the scope of work within the grant agreement and work toward the mutual goal of providing services for the clean-up of Homeless Encampments throughout South Lake Tahoe;

4. Authorizes the appropriation of grant funds into the fiscal year 22/23 annual grant budget as follows:
137
Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
Account Number: 241 03801
Revenue: 33243: $70,000
Expenses: 42010: $70,000
Passed & Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 16, 2023, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________________________ Date: _________
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Attest:
____________________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
138

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE POLICE DEPARTMENT
AND

CLEAN TAHOE PROGRAM
OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT: June 01, 2023 through March 13, 2025 This Operational Agreement stands as evidence that Clean Tahoe Program and South Lake Tahoe Police Department intend to work together toward the mutual goal of providing maximum available assistance for the clean-up of Homeless Encampments throughout South Lake Tahoe; including public parcels owned by the City, El Dorado County, California Tahoe Conservancy, USFS, and other public agencies, utilizing funds through Cal Recycle Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Grant Program. To this end, each agency agrees to participate in the grant program by coordinating/ providing the following services:

City of South Lake Tahoe agrees to:

Police Department in coordination with the STACS team

1. Coordinate with Clean Tahoe to assist in identifying nuisance encampments

2. Post notice of encampment cleanup per requirements in City Code

3. Provide assistance offering services to inhabitants of encampments

4. Review and approve Clean Tahoe invoices for payment
Finance (Grant Management)

1. Manage grant requirements and grant budget

2. Submit quarterly grant payment request with complete expenditure itemization summary form and all backup documentation

3. Enter and track account receivables, manage cash flow

4. Retain documentation for audit
Clean Tahoe Program agrees to:

1. Provide Site Approval Form to CalRecycle for each site prior to site cleanup

2. Provide site survey of debris and photos

3. Obtain location approval from land owner, property owner determination, necessary agreement negotiation, eviction if necessary

4. Obtain “Reliable Contractor Declaration” approval from CalRecyle prior to authorizing a contractor to commence work

5. Implement timely abatement and clean-up regardless of landowner

6. Prevent future illegal dumping from escalating by responding quickly to illegal dumping cases and collaborating with law enforcement

7. Prepare progress reports quarterly and final report during the full grant term 139

8. Submit invoices for all work performed with appropriate back-up documentation, receipts, payroll verification, and any other documentation required for payment

9. Prepare Grant Report Form reporting a record of material removed from the site(s), include weight tickets and tire manifests (if necessary) from transfer station

10. Maintain grant compliances according to grant contract and perform all activities described in the scope of series as approved by Cal Recycle

11. Receive prior approval from the City and CalRecycle to make any changes to the project implementation and/or the approved budget allocation

12. Provide photographs taken after the cleanup, demonstrating the site has been fully remediated

13. Cooperate fully and provide documentation with any reviews or audits of the activities under this Agreement requested by either the City or CalRecyle In undertaking the tasks set forth in this agreement, the parties agree to each hold the other harmless, including each party’s elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this agreement , except for any such claims arising out of a party’s sole negligence or willful misconduct.

We, the undersigned, as authorized representatives of the City of South Lake Tahoe and The Clean Tahoe Program, do hereby approve this agreement.

Signed: ________________________________ Date: _________________ Executive Director, Clean Tahoe Program
Signed: ______________________________________ Date: _______________________ Joe Irvin, City Manager
Approve as to Form:
__________________________ Date:_______________
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attest:
_____________________________ Date:_______________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
140
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 9
Agenda Item: Road Rehabilitation Program Update
Executive Summary: The Public Works Department will provide an update on the City paving program and the latest results from our Pavement Conditions Index Report. The update will address the 2023 Road Rehabilitation Project, an overview of the City’s roadway network, how roadway conditions are rated, the overall condition of City roadways, how roads are prioritized for paving, utility coordination, how the paving program is funded, and the next five-year project prioritization.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive and File.

Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works (530) 542-6031 Mark Frisina, Resident Engineer (530) 542-7415
Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report-Pavement Management Plan Update.docx
02 - Draft City of South Lake Tahoe Condition Report.pdf 03 - Annual Report Rehab Presentation.pptx
141
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 6
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Pavement Management Plan Update
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad - (530) 542-6031 and Mark Frisina - (530) 307-9607 Background: The City maintains approximately 257 lane miles or 125.97 centerline miles of streets. To prioritize the maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s roadways, a paving and maintenance plan has been developed to guide priority setting and implementation.

Council approved a professional services agreement with Data Transfer Solutions (DTS) at the September 20, 2022, City Council meeting that authorized evaluating the City’s roadway network Pavement Conditions Index (PCI) ratings and providing an updated 5-year paving and maintenance plan. All roadway PCI measurements were completed in the fall of 2022, and a final plan has been prepared (Attachment 1).

Issue and Discussion: With the passage of Measure S, a dedicated funding stream is now available for maintaining and paving the roads. To ensure that the funds are spent as efficiently as possible, DTS has prepared a paving and maintenance plan for the City to follow. The plan was compiled using the latest PCI measurements, evaluating upcoming utility projects, considering staff knowledge of problem areas, and clustering projects to increase cost efficiency and replace failing stormwater infrastructure.

Currently, the city maintains the following roadway assets:
 Arterials: 8.59 centerline miles (6.82%)
 Collectors: 22.31 centerline miles (17.71%)
 Local Roads: 95.07 centerline miles (75.47%)
Figure 1 shows the functional class distribution in South Lake Tahoe.

The pavement condition assessment includes an automated mobile data collection, calculated Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and measured International Roughness Index (IRI). The assessment and conditions rating were performed per national standards, where applicable. The PCI value is represented by a numerical index between 0 and 100, where 0 is the worst possible condition and 100 is the best possible condition. The network PCI was determined following the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) "Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys." The network average of the City's road segment PCI values for the collected roads was calculated to be 55 at the time of collection. This value indicates that the roadway network is generally in 'Poor' condition. 142
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 6
Figure 1 – Functional Class Distribution
The PCI analysis showed that 61.2% of the roadways in the city are in poor to serious conditions.

Table 1 shows the current pavement condition index distribution. Figure 2 shows graphically the distribution of pavement conditions in the city.
143
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 3 of 6
Figure 2 – PCI Distribution (2022)
Pavement Rehabilitation Methods: There are several methods to repair, fix and extend the life of the pavement. The city will be utilizing all of these methods to maintain the roadway network in the future.

Crack Sealing (Local Repair – Typically with City Forces) Sealing and filling asphalt concrete (AC) pavement cracks is a common road maintenance activity. Specialized materials are placed into or above cracks to prevent water intrusion and incompressible material into the cracks and reinforce the adjacent pavement. This distress treatment will address alligator, longitudinal/transverse, and block cracking.

Slurry Seal/Chip Seal/Micro-Surface (Preservation – Typically by City Forces or Outside Contractor)
A slurry seal is a mixture of aggregate (small rock), asphalt emulsion, cement, and water.

The asphalt emulsion serves as a binder, holding the crushed aggregate together and adhering the new slurry surface to the old surface which it is being applied over. Mixing and spreading are accomplished in one continuous operation, with the applied surface being ready for traffic within a few hours. This is similar to a chip seal but is mainly used on lowvolume traffic roads.

A single chip seal is an application of binder followed by an aggregate. This is used as a pavement preservation treatment and provides a new skid-resistant wearing surface, arrests raveling, and seals minor cracks.
144
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 4 of 6
Micro-surfacing is a protective seal coat that extends the life of the pavement. It is a thin, tough layer of asphalt emulsion blended with finely crushed stone for traction. This method is cost-effective for renewing the road surface and sealing minor cracks and other irregularities. This preventive maintenance process protects the pavement from moisture penetration and oxidation. Similar to painting a house, micro surfacing creates a protective layer that preserves the underlying structure and prevents the need for more expensive repairs in the future.

Milling and Overlay (Minor/Major Rehabilitation:2” or 4” Mill+Overlay – Outside Contractor) Milling the road's surface is required to remove the distresses extending into the pavement.

Asphalt overlay is a plant-mixed combination of asphalt cement and aggregate applied to the pavement in thicknesses, usually between 1.5 to 2 inches for thick overlay. This type of rehabilitation will address alligator cracking, longitudinal/transverse cracking, raveling/weathering, friction loss, roughness, bleeding, block cracking, and rutting.

Reconstruction (Pulverize in Place – Outside Contractor) Reconstruction consists of removing an existing asphaltic or concrete pavement, base rework, and constructing new pavement structures. Typically, this pavement rehabilitation method is used on excessively deteriorated roads with high severity distresses for most roadway extents. Additional analysis is generally required for a full-depth rehabilitation, including pavement coring, traffic loading analysis, and stormwater drainage analysis.

Based on the DTS report and the PCI index, staff is recommending the following roadways for mil and overlay for the 2023 pavement rehabilitation cycle:
 Ski Run Blvd. – Pioneer Tr. to Needle Pk.
 Ski Run Blvd. – Needle Pk. to Saddle Rd.
 Julie Ln. – Lake Tahoe Blvd. to F St.
 Delta St. – Julie Ln. to Tata Ln.
 B St. – Julie Ln. to Tata Ln.
 F St. – Julie Ln. to Margaret Ave.
 Margaret Ave. – Delta St. to F St.
 Dedi St. – Delta St. to F St.

Additional Alternate segments can be added depending on final bids:
 Tata Ln. – Lake Tahoe Blvd. to D St.
 Tata Ln. – D St. to F St.
 D St. – Lake Tahoe Blvd. to Julie Ln.

Financial Implications: Street rehabilitation and preservation will be funded from the Street Overlay Program CIP account. The account is funded in part by the Measure S Sales Tax fund.

DTS performed four funding scenarios as follows, which are detailed in Attachment 1. The scenarios are as follows:

1. Scenario 1: 5-Year Baseline Scenario: no budget was allocated to see how the roads will deteriorate over five years with no work.
145
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 5 of 6

2. Scenario 2: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First): assuming the City's recommended pavement maintenance budget of $2,500,000 annually for five years to perform maintenance to all roads at the lowest PCI level first.

3. Scenario 3: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First): assuming the City's recommended pavement maintenance budget of $2,500,000 annually for five years to perform maintenance to all roads at the highest PCI level first.

4. Scenario 4: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65): assuming an unlimited pavement maintenance budget to achieve an average network PCI of 65 at the end of the five years.

Staff recommends Scenario 2, where approximately $2.5 million is expended annually, and the lowest PCI levels are treated first. If this option is used, approximately 18 miles can be treated during the next five years (2023-2027). If more funding is available, additional roadways can be treated. The next two figures show the cost distribution for Scenario 2. More detailed information is included in Attachment 1.

Figure 3 – 5-Year Pavement Rehab Cost Distribution per Activity Type – Scenario 2 (Worst PCI First) The estimated cost for the recommended 2023 roadway rehab projects is $3.8 million for the base bid roadways and $1.4 million for alternate bid items. Currently, the Street Overlay Account has a balance of $5,992,089 for Construction (Account 301-5005-4830). Staff is reserving approximately $1.4 million for the pavement component of two construction projects this season (2nd and Barton and Tahoe Valley and Green Belt) and $600,000 for the pothole repair contracts. This leaves a 146
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 6 of 6
balance of $3.992 million for the annual pavement program. If bids are favorable, then one or more of the alternate roadways can be added. It is anticipated that the 2023 paving project will be awarded at the June 5, 2023 Council Meeting.

Environmental Considerations: This plan update is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(2).

Policy Implications: This plan update is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan 2021-2026.

It aligns with goal 1.4 Transportation, by planning the rehabilitation of City-owned streets. The plan update is also consistent with goal 5.3, Infrastructure and Maintenance. This plan update will achieve action item 1 by defining maintenance needs for the roadway network while simultaneously matching the project to available funding sources such as Measure S, Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB1 Gas Tax), and in lieu paving funds from utility providers.
147
P a g e | 1
1 | P a g e
2022 Pavement Management Services
Pavement Condition Report
City of South Lake Tahoe, California
March 2023
Prepared by:

Data Transfer Solutions, LLC
3680 Avalon Park East Blvd., Suite 200
Orlando, FL 32828
www.dtsgis.com
148
Table of Contents

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................1

2.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................2

2.1 SAMPLE UNITS ................................................................................................................................................................ 4

3.0 PURPOSE......................................................................................................................................................5

4.0 PROJECT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY..............................................................................................6

5.0 AUTOMATED DATA COLLECTION AND EQUIPMENT....................................................................7

6.0 PAVEMENT CONDITION ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 13

6.1 PAVEMENT DISTRESS INVENTORY ............................................................................................................................14

6.2 PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) CALCULATION.............................................................................................16

6.3 INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESS INDEX ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................19

6.4 PAVEMENT CONDITION RESULTS ..............................................................................................................................21

7.0 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE METHODS .......................................................................................... 24

7.1 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE FUNDING.......................................................................................................................25

7.2 5-YEAR BASELINE SCENARIO.....................................................................................................................................26

7.3 5-YEAR CURRENT BUDGET SCENARIO – WORST FIRST........................................................................................27

7.4 5-YEAR CURRENT BUDGET SCENARIO – BEST FIRST ............................................................................................31

7.5 5-YEAR BUDGET SCENARIO – TARGET PCI OF 65.................................................................................................35

APPENDIX A - SEGMENT LEVEL PCI DATA
149
List of Figures
Figure 1: Functional Class Distribution ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Deterioration Curve Example................................................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 3: Deterioration Curve.................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 4: DTS MAC Vehicle.......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 5: Network Coverage Map............................................................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 6: Nine-Point Calibration Site Example.................................................................................................................................10 Figure 7: Pavement Image Example......................................................................................................................................................11 Figure 8: Right-of-Way Image Example...............................................................................................................................................12 Figure 9: EarthShaper™ Pavement Tool Example ..........................................................................................................................13 Figure 10: PCI Distribution Map.............................................................................................................................................................18 Figure 11: IRI Distribution Map..............................................................................................................................................................20 Figure 12: Asphalt Distress Breakdown..............................................................................................................................................22 Figure 13: Overall Pavement Condition Distribution....................................................................................................................23 Figure 14: 5-Year Baseline Scenario – PCI Plot................................................................................................................................26 Figure 15: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – PCI Plot.....................................................................................27 Figure 16: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – Distribution of Cost per Activity...................................29 Figure 17: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – Distribution of Miles per Activity.................................30 Figure 18: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – PCI Plot.........................................................................................31 Figure 19: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – Distribution of Cost per Activity.......................................33 Figure 20: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – Distribution of Miles per Activity.....................................34 Figure 21: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – PCI Plot............................................................................................35 Figure 22: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – Distribution of Cost per Activity ..........................................37 Figure 23: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – Distribution of Miles per Activity ........................................38 150
List of Tables
Table 1: Pavement Inspection Breakdown .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 2: ASTM D6433-20 PCI Condition Groups.............................................................................................................................16 Table 3: ASTM D6433-20 PCI Ranges by Percent...........................................................................................................................17 Table 4: IRI Category Ranges by Miles.................................................................................................................................................19 Table 5: Percent of Functional Class in each PCI Condition Group .........................................................................................21 Table 6: Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Severity..........................................................................................................................22 Table 7: Treatments, Activities, and Costs .........................................................................................................................................25 Table 8: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – Total Funded Plan Cost .........................................................27 Table 9: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – Activities Breakdown.............................................................28 Table 10: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – Total Funded Plan Cost...........................................................31 Table 11: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – Activities Breakdown..............................................................32 Table 12: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – Total Funded Plan Cost ..............................................................35 Table 13: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – Activities Breakdown..................................................................36 151
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 1 | P a g e

1.0 Executive Summary
Data Transfer Solutions, LLC (DTS) performed a pavement condition assessment for the City of South Lake Tahoe, California, to complement and update the existing Pavement Management Plan (PMP).

The data collection started and was completed in October 2022. This report provides the processes and procedures for pavement condition data collection and evaluation, assessment of the results, and maintenance recommendations for the City's maintained roadway network.

The pavement condition assessment includes an automated mobile data collection, calculated Pavement Condition Index (PCI), measured International Roughness Index (IRI) based on the previously listed parameters, and the delivery of an ESRI file geodatabase. The assessment and conditions rating were performed in general accordance with national standards, where applicable.

VUEWorks® Asset Management Software (AMS) was used to calculate the PCI. The PCI is a numerical rating of the pavement condition based on the type and severity of the distresses observed on the pavement surface. The PCI value is represented by a numerical index between 0 and 100, where 0 is the worst possible condition and 100 is the best possible condition. The network PCI was determined following the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D6433-20 "Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys." The network average of the City's road segment PCI values for the collected roads was calculated to be 55 at the time of collection. This value indicates the roadway network is generally in 'Poor' condition.

Table 1 lists the roadway network system surveyed as part of this pavement condition project.

Table 1: Pavement Inspection Breakdown
Item Description Centerline
Miles
Percent of
Centerline
Miles
1 Arterial Roads 8.59 6.82%
2 Collector Roads 22.31 17.71%
3 Local Roads 95.07 75.47%
Total 125.97 100%
152
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 2 | P a g e

2.0 Introduction
A pavement condition survey was conducted in October 2022 on 125.97 centerline miles. A Mobile Asset Collection (MAC) vehicle was used to collect street-level right-of-way (ROW) and pavement images. Pavement images were used to determine street segment pavement conditions, while streetlevel ROW images were used to identify area distresses. The results of this analysis of the roadways were used to develop multiple budget scenarios in VUEWorks® AMS and evaluate the maintenance needs of the City's roadway network.

Roadway networks are usually divided into three pavement surface types: Asphalt Concrete (AC), Portland Cement Concrete (PCC), and Unsurfaced (UNS); however, the City's network only consists of Asphalt pavement. The distribution of the roadway network by functional class in the City is displayed in Figure 1.

The pavement condition survey included a set of pre-defined parameters to develop a segment and network-level index (number) that correlates to existing pavement surface conditions. This project used the ASTM D6433-20' Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys' pavement condition analysis method to determine the road segment and network PCI. The ASTM D6433-20 method covers the process of quantifying pavement conditions and identifies pavement distress types, distress extent measurements, and distress severity. The ASTM D6433-20 outlines the procedure for calculating the PCI value.

This project used VUEWorks® AMS to calculate the PCI value and analyze the network PCI ranges.

Additionally, VUEWorks® AMS was used in a parallel analysis for setting maintenance procedures and associated costs, and developing budgets to meet the City's pavement maintenance requirements.
153
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 3 | P a g e
Figure 1: Functional Class Distribution
154
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 4 | P a g e

2.1 Sample Units
The ASTM D6433-20 procedure outlines how the road network is divided into sections and sample units; first identifying the branches of the pavement with different uses, then dividing each branch into sections based on pavement design, construction history, traffic, and condition. These sections are then divided into sample units that are approximately 2,600 square feet in size. The number of sample units to be inspected within each section may vary based on the following options: all the sample units in the section, a number of sample units that provides a 95% confidence level, or a lesser number. DTS typically follows the 95% confidence level method for a cost-efficient representation.

Once the number of sample units to be inspected has been determined, the spacing interval of the units is computed using systematic random sampling. Samples are spaced equally throughout the section, with the first sample selected at random, at least 100 feet from the intersection. The samples surveyed within the City of South Lake Tahoe consisted of approximately 41.40 centerline miles, comprising 32.86% of the total network.

DTS believes this sampling method provides the most economical representation of the 125.97 centerline miles of pavement conditions within the City of South Lake Tahoe. This approach has been used as a national standard for over 40 years to provide adequate representation of the roadway without the need to expend excessive time and money to evaluate 100% of the roadway.

Based upon the national standards, the first survey sample is typically not located within 100 feet of an intersection for multiple reasons. Intersections often contain specific distresses that are not observed throughout the remainder of the pavement section and would not represent the condition of the overall section. Intersections also receive traffic from both directions, along with severe turning and stopping movements that are not indicative of the traffic in most of the pavement sections. As a result, specific and localized maintenance may be required for the intersections. It is important to note that the PCI method is designed as a network-level analysis for the overall condition of pavement sections and is not intended to provide the information required to make detailed maintenance decisions. DTS recorded and provided images for all intersections; therefore, distress and condition ratings can be extracted from the images in the intersections upon specific request.
155
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 5 | P a g e

3.0 Purpose
This report aims to describe the tools, processes and procedures used to collect and analyze the pavement condition data and provide a summary of the results obtained from calculating each segment's PCI using VUEWorks® AMS.

A pavement begins to deteriorate from the day it is constructed. Many factors affect the deterioration rate, such as traffic loads, climatic conditions, age, material durability, damage caused by poor drainage, and construction factors. These factors cause the deterioration rate to be different for every pavement section. In order to manage an extensive pavement network, "family performance curves" were developed from available data to represent the expected performance of like roadways and help determine optimal times to apply preventive and rehabilitation treatments. In order to develop more accurate curves, periodic evaluations of the pavement condition must be performed to gain a realistic representation of the condition versus the age of the pavement network. The graph in Figure 2 provides an example deterioration curve that represents the exponential deterioration of a typical pavement.

As shown in the graph, the initial deterioration of the pavement is at a slow rate; after approximately 40% to 50% of a pavement's service life, the pavement rapidly deteriorates. Understanding the condition and age at which this rapid drop in condition occurs is valuable in determining the optimal time for maintenance. This philosophy is the basis for good pavement management. This condition evaluation aims to better understand the value of preventive versus reactive maintenance, which is often at a much higher cost.

Figure 2: Deterioration Curve Example
The industry standard is to assess pavements every three to five years. More frequent assessments will likely not indicate significant changes in the condition since most pavements are anticipated to deteriorate two to five points per year. Assessments that take place more than five years apart will likely miss critical changes and not provide adequate data to define points in the curve where 156
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 6 | P a g e
preventive maintenance is best applied. DTS recommends assessments every three years for networks greater than 500 miles.

DTS back-calculated each road segment's install/construction dates based on its current PCI score and the VUEWorks® deterioration curve displayed in Figure 3. Every road segment's PCI value is anticipated to deteriorate according to this curve until pavement maintenance work is performed.

Figure 3: Deterioration Curve

4.0 Project Scope and Methodology
The overall project scope of work included the six tasks outlined below:
• Verify the City's road network
• Mobile image data collection
• Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
• International Roughness Index (IRI)
• Pavement condition final report
• Pavement maintenance methods
157
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 7 | P a g e

5.0 Automated Data Collection and Equipment
In order to determine the general distress characteristics of each roadway segment, DTS utilized a MAC vehicle, displayed in Figure 4, to collect street-level ROW imagery and downward pavement imagery. The MAC vehicle utilized a Class 1 device as defined by the specifications.

DTS MAC vehicles combine multiple engineered technologies to collect real-time pavement data, ROW data, and images at posted speed limits. This eliminates the need to place pavement inspection technicians in the field close to vehicle traffic. Some MAC vehicle components include:

Navigation System
• Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU): Generates an accurate representation of vehicle motion in all three axes; produces continuous, precise position and orientation information. • Position and Orientation Computer System: Enables raw GPS data from as few as one satellite to be processed directly into the system to compute accurate positional information in areas of intermittent or no GPS reception.
• GPS Receivers: Provide heading aiding to supplement the inertial data • GPS Antennas: Generate raw observables data.
• Sub-meter accuracy: Rated to get 0.3 m accuracy in the X, Y positions and 0.5 m in the Z position.

Distance Measuring Indicator (DMI)
• Allows for the collection of high-resolution imagery at posted speeds. DMI computes wheel rotation information to aid vehicle positioning.

Cameras
• High-definition cameras with precision lenses allow for accurate asset extraction and videolog recording.
• Frame rate: 15 images per second, with 1936 x 1456 color resolution.

Pavement Imaging System
• Two line-scan cameras and lasers configured to image 4m transverse road sections with 1 mm resolution (4000 pixel) at speeds that can reach 100 km/h. • Allows fully illuminated pavement image collection even in heavy shadow/canopy areas. 158
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 8 | P a g e
Figure 4: DTS MAC Vehicle
Downward-facing pavement images were used in quantifying distress type, severity, and extent present on road segments. The resolution of the imagery allows for the distresses to be easily identified and measured during the analysis portion of the contract.

The mobile image collection of the City's roadway network was accomplished through coordination with the City's staff. Efforts associated with the mobile image collection included a review of the client's GIS street centerline file, route planning based on the GIS street centerline, and coordination of existing construction projects along the City's streets. DTS and the City's staff reviewed all MAC image collection routes to ensure all streets attained complete image coverage. This effort was accomplished by checking a GIS shapefile of the MAC daily GPS point associated with each image collected overlaid on the GIS street centerline file, as displayed in Figure 5. The DTS MAC vehicle collected pavement and ROW images every 25 feet along each street segment. 159
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 9 | P a g e
Figure 5: Network Coverage Map
DTS MAC image collection included a daily check of the onboard systems. This vehicle component check consisted of a calibration site survey of a nine-point grid in state plane coordinates, as displayed in Figure 6. The MAC vehicle drove over the surveyed location each morning and afternoon before and after a day's image collection. The MAC technician then extracted each point's location to verify the location of the point extracted was within approximately three feet of the surveyed points.

DTS' QA/QC manual includes additional details regarding MAC quality control procedures. 160
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 10 | P a g e
Figure 6: Nine-Point Calibration Site Example
Each day's image and road data collection were recorded on a MAC server and backed up to an external hard drive. The external hard drives were mailed back to DTS' project office, where the data was placed on a production server for post-processing of images and data, quality control review, and pavement distress inventory.
161
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 11 | P a g e
Figure 7: Pavement Image Example
ROW images were also collected as part of this contract. Figure 8 displays an example of a ROW image. The MAC vehicle was configured with a four-camera setup; three forward-facing cameras and one rear-facing camera. The images were captured at roughly 25-foot intervals and were postprocessed using collected inertial and GPS data. This allowed for more accurate asset extraction to be completed.
162
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 12 | P a g e
Figure 8: Right-of-Way Image Example
The automated data collection effort for the City of South Lake Tahoe roadway network began and was completed in October 2022.
163
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 13 | P a g e

6.0 Pavement Condition Assessment
The MAC GPS, IMU, DMI, and ROW imagery is post-processed daily. A project data dictionary that includes all distress types and allowable severities was created after coordination with the City. This data dictionary is provided to trained pavement condition technicians who utilize DTS' spatial image analysis software EarthShaper™ to analyze and digitize pavement distress types, extents, and severities as a point, line and/or polygon, displayed in Figure 9. Depending on the distress type measurement required by the project data dictionary, each distress was digitized, recorded in the pavement condition database and associated with the road section that was surveyed. In addition, each road section's total type, severity and extent of distresses was calculated.

Figure 9: EarthShaper™ Pavement Tool Example
This method of pavement distress inventory provides a quantifiable and repeatable process for the City to use in future MAC image collection projects. Each road segment, in conjunction with the pavement and ROW imagery, allows pavement engineers to review each pavement technician's data, allowing for an open quality control process.

After completion of distress identification and analysis, the City's roadway network distress data was then imported into VUEWorks® AMS, where the PCI was calculated. 164
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 14 | P a g e

6.1 Pavement Distress Inventory
A pavement distress inventory consists of identifying specific pavement surface distress types that are associated with the degradation of a pavement surface due to traffic loads, environmental factors, lack of maintenance and other anthropogenic or natural occurrences. The distress type is then assigned a severity rating (low/moderate/high), and the extent of the distress type and severity are recorded. For this project, the pavement distress types, severity definitions and measurements were inventoried utilizing the ASTM D6433-20 method of pavement condition assessment for both AC and PCC pavements. The inspections covered 100% of the length of a sample for the outside lane of travel and, for roads with three or more lanes, the inspection covered the outside and the inside lane. Those roads were inspected utilizing the ASTM D6433-20 sampling approach (completed for both directions of travel).

Definitions (units of measure)
• AC Bleeding & Pumping (ft2) represents excessive use of bituminous binder in the asphalt mix.
• AC Fatigue (Alligator) Cracking (ft2) is associated with fatigue due to traffic loading and visually looks as interconnected cracks forming small pieces ranging in size from about 1" to 6", typically in the wheel path.
• AC Block Cracking (ft2) usually intersects at nearly right angles and ranges from one foot to 10' or more across. The closer spacing indicates more advanced aging caused by the shrinking and hardening of the asphalt over time.
• AC Edge Cracking (ft) is parallel to and usually within 1.5 feet of the outer edge of the pavement. This distress is accelerated by traffic loading and can be caused by a frostweakened base or subgrade near the edge of the pavement. • AC/PCC Lane/Shoulder Drop-off (ft) is a difference in elevation between the pavement edge and the shoulder. This distress is caused by shoulder erosion, shoulder settlement, or by building up the roadway without adjusting the shoulder level. • AC Linear Cracking (trans/long) (ft) typically occurs in overlays where the crack is reflected through the overlaying asphalt surface.
• AC Patching (ft2) is an area of pavement that has been replaced with new material to repair existing pavement.
• AC Potholes (count) are small, usually less than 30 inches in diameter, bowl-shaped depressions in the pavement surface. Generally, have sharp edges and vertical sides near the top of the hole.
• AC Raveling & Weathering (ft2) is the loss of pavement material from the asphalt surface.

Typically raveling is caused by the stripping of the bituminous film from the aggregate or hardening of asphalt due to aging. Poor compaction, especially in cold weather construction, or insufficient asphalt content are also causes of raveling. • AC Slippage Cracking (ft2) is a crescent of half-moon-shaped cracks, usually transverse to the direction of travel. They are produced when braking or turning wheels cause the pavement to slide or deform.
• AC Rutting (ft2) is a surface depression in the wheel paths. • PCC Corner Break (slab count) is a crack that intersects the joints. Load repetition combined with the loss of support and curling stresses usually cause corner breaks. • PCC Divided Slab (slab count) is when a slab is divided into four or more pieces due to overloading or inadequate support.
165
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 15 | P a g e
• PCC Durability "D" Cracking (slab count) is caused by freeze-thaw expansion of the large aggregate, which gradually breaks down the concrete. Usually appears as a pattern of cracks running parallel and close to a joint or linear crack.
• PCC Joint Sealant Damage (slab count) is any condition that enables soil or rocks to accumulate in the joints or allows significant water infiltration. • PCC Linear Cracking (trans/long) (slab count) divides the slab into two or three pieces and is usually caused by a combination of repeated traffic loading, thermal gradient curling, and repeated moisture loading.
• PCC Patching, Large/Utility Cut (slab count) is an area where the original pavement has been removed and replaced by new pavement.
• PCC Patching, Small (slab count) is an area where the original pavement has been removed and replaced by filler material.
• PCC Polished Aggregate (slab count) is caused by repeated traffic applications. There are no rough or angular aggregate particles to provide good skid resistance. • PCC Popouts (slab count) is a small piece of pavement that breaks loose from the surface due to freeze-thaw action, combined with expansive aggregates. Usually range in diameter from 1 to 4 inches and in depth from ½ to 2 inches.
• PCC Punchout (slab count) is a localized area of the slab that is broken into pieces. This distress is caused by heavy repeated loads, inadequate slab thickness, loss of foundation support or localized concrete construction deficiency.
• PCC Scaling/Map Cracking/Crazing (slab count) is a network of shallow, fine or hairline cracks that extend only through the upper surface of the concrete. Usually caused by concrete over-finishing and may lead to scaling, which is the breakdown of the slab surface to a depth of ¼ to ½ in.
• PCC Shrinkage Cracks (slab count) are hairline cracks usually less than 6 feet long and do not extend across the entire slab. They are formed during the setting and curing of the concrete and do not extend through the depth of the slab.
• PCC Spalling, Corner (slab count) is the breakdown of the slab within 1.5 feet of the corner.

Usually caused by traffic loading or infiltration of incompressible materials, weak concrete and/or water accumulation and freeze-thaw action.
• PCC Spalling, Joint (slab count) is the breakdown of the slab edges within 1.5 feet of the joint.

Usually caused by traffic loading or infiltration of incompressible materials, weak concrete and/or water accumulation and freeze-thaw action.
166
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 16 | P a g e

6.2 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Calculation
Each Road segment's PCI was calculated utilizing VUEWorks® AMS. This AMS is based on the ASTM D6433-20 method of calculating a road segment's PCI value using the pavement inventory database and the ASTM D6433-20 deduct curve.

With a completed pavement condition inventory database, DTS imported the road segment, inspection, sample, and distress information into the AMS, where the PCI was calculated. ASTM D6433-20 is based on a 0 to 100 rating scale where 0 represents a failed roadway condition and 100 represents an excellent roadway condition. Table 2 displays the PCI condition groups.

Table 2: ASTM D6433-20 PCI Condition Groups
PCI Range Condition Description
86 - 100 GOOD
71 - 85 SATISFACTORY
56 - 70 FAIR
41 - 55 POOR
26 - 40 VERY POOR
11 - 25 SERIOUS
0 - 10 FAILED
167
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 17 | P a g e
Table 3 lists the ASTM D6433-20 PCI range categories, condition description, and percent of the network in each range category. Figure 10 displays the PCI distribution of the City's PCI scores.

Table 3: ASTM D6433-20 PCI Ranges by Percent
PCI Range Condition
Description Centerline Miles Percent of Network
86-100 Good 21.68 17.21%
71-85 Satisfactory 8.50 6.75%
56-70 Fair 18.69 14.84%
41-55 Poor 37.76 29.98%
26-40 Very Poor 33.87 26.89%
11-25 Serious 5.47 4.33%
0-10 Failed 0.00 0.00%
Total 125.97 100%
168
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 18 | P a g e
Figure 10: PCI Distribution Map
The PCI value for each road segment can be viewed in the City's shapefile. The average of the road segment PCI values for the collected roads was calculated to be 55 at the time of collection. This value indicates the roadway network is generally in 'Poor' condition. 169
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 19 | P a g e

6.3 International Roughness Index Analysis
International Roughness Index (IRI) values were collected along the survey segments using a highspeed five-laser profiler as part of this project. The IRI is a general measurement of the ride quality of a street section and was performed in accordance with AASHTO R 43-07 and ASTM E950. IRI indexes were obtained from measured longitudinal road profiles and were processed using a quarter-car model at 52.80-foot intervals (0.010/mi). DTS' surface profiling system uses infrared lasers and a precision accelerometer to obtain accurate and precise profile measurements. The values reported in the centerline provided to the City are in units of inches per mile. It should be noted that IRI indexes can "spike," resulting in erroneous data being reported along sections of roads where slow speeds (below 15mph) were encountered. Due to slow testing speeds at the time of collection, approximately 2.47 centerline miles of the collected network do not have an IRI value.

Categorization of IRI indexes can vary from state to state and are typically determined by the agency (e.g. City, DOT, City, etc.). For the purpose of this report, the results have been based on a common category system that various agencies have used. Table 4 and Figure 11 list the IRI range categories and display the IRI distribution for the collected roads.

Table 4: IRI Category Ranges by Miles
IRI Category IRI Value (in/Mile) Centerline Miles
Excellent <= 127 4.45
Good 128 – 154 2.33
Fair 155 – 240 51.33
Marginal 241 – 489 65.34
Poor 490 – 625 0.05
Very Poor > 625 0.00
170
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 20 | P a g e
Figure 11: IRI Distribution Map
171
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 21 | P a g e

6.4 Pavement Condition Results
The roadway network consists of 125.97 centerline miles of roadway. Table 1 lists the distribution of the current roadway network by functional class and outlines the number of miles that were able to be collected and analyzed.

Table 5 displays a summary of the roadway network PCI based on functional class.

Table 5: Percent of Functional Class in each PCI Condition Group Functional
Class
Good
(86-100)
Satisfactory
(71-85)
Fair
(56-70)
Poor
(41-55)
Very
Poor
(26-40)
Serious
(11-25)
Failed
(0-10)
Arterial 3.87% 0.66% 0.36% 0.88% 1.04% 0.00% 0.00%
Collector 6.12% 2.16% 2.31% 4.05% 2.70% 0.37% 0.00%
Local 7.21% 3.93% 12.16% 25.05% 23.15% 3.98% 0.00%
Total 17.20% 6.75% 14.83% 29.98% 26.89% 4.35% 0.00%
Figures 12 and Table 6 display the breakdown of the types of distresses for asphalt. 172
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 22 | P a g e
Figure 12: Asphalt Distress Breakdown
Table 6: Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Severity
Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Severity
Type Severity LOW MODERATE HIGH
AC Linear Cracking 15.86% 14.27% 5.82%
AC Fatigue 9.91% 11.79% 1.33%
AC Raveling/Weathering 17.73% 0.06% 0.97%
AC Patching 9.42% 2.86% 0.13%
AC Block Cracking 3.26% 2.47% 0.03%
AC Rutting 3.99% 0.11% <0.01%
173
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 23 | P a g e
Figure 13 represents the overall pavement condition distribution based on miles.

Figure 13: Overall Pavement Condition Distribution
174
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 24 | P a g e

7.0 Pavement Maintenance Methods
The specific activity to perform on each road depends upon the pavement distresses observed, traffic loads, climatic conditions, age, material durability, damage caused by poor drainage, and construction factors. The following pavement maintenance and preservation methods were utilized to develop the budget scenarios.

Crack Sealing
Sealing and filling asphalt concrete (AC) pavement cracks is a common road maintenance activity.

Specialized materials are placed into or above cracks to prevent water intrusion and incompressible material into the cracks and reinforce the adjacent pavement. This distress treatment will address alligator, longitudinal/transverse, and block cracking.

Slurry Seal
A slurry seal is a mixture of aggregate (small rock), asphalt emulsion, cement, and water. The asphalt emulsion serves as a binder, holding the crushed aggregate together and adhering the new slurry surface to the old surface which it is being applied over. Mixing and spreading are accomplished in one continuous operation, with the applied surface being ready for traffic within a few hours. This is similar to a chip seal but is mainly used on low-volume traffic roads.

Chip Seal
A single chip seal is an application of binder followed by an aggregate. This is used as a pavement preservation treatment and provides a new skid-resistant wearing surface, arrests raveling, and seals minor cracks.

Micro Surface
Micro surfacing is a protective seal coat that extends the life of the pavement. It is a thin, tough layer of asphalt emulsion blended with finely crushed stone for traction. This method is cost-effective for renewing the road surface and sealing minor cracks and other irregularities. This preventive maintenance process protects the pavement from moisture penetration and oxidation. Similar to painting a house, micro surfacing creates a protective layer that preserves the underlying structure and prevents the need for more expensive repairs in the future.

Milling and Overlay
Milling the road's surface is required to remove the distresses extending into the pavement. Asphalt overlay is a plant-mixed combination of asphalt cement and aggregate applied to the pavement in thicknesses, usually between 1.5 to 2 inches for thick overlay. This type of rehabilitation will address alligator cracking, longitudinal/transverse cracking, raveling/weathering, friction loss, roughness, bleeding, block cracking, and rutting
Reconstruction
Reconstruction consists of completely removing an existing asphaltic or concrete pavement, base rework, and constructing new pavement structures. Typically, this method of pavement rehabilitation is used on excessively deteriorated roads with high severity distresses for most of the roadway extents. Additional analysis is generally required for a full-depth rehabilitation, including pavement coring, traffic loading analysis, and stormwater drainage analysis. 175
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 25 | P a g e

7.1 Pavement Maintenance Funding
DTS performed various five-year pavement maintenance and preservation program scenarios for the City's consideration using VUEWorks® AMS. The analyses included:

The scenarios performed for the City include:

1. 5-Year Baseline Scenario: no budget was allocated to see how the roads will deteriorate over five years with no work.

2. 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First): assuming the City's recommended pavement maintenance budget of $2,500,000 annually for five years to perform maintenance to all roads at the lowest PCI level first.

3. 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First): assuming the City's recommended pavement maintenance budget of $2,500,000 annually for five years to perform maintenance to all roads at the highest PCI level first.

4. 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65): assuming an unlimited pavement maintenance budget to achieve an average network PCI of 65 at the end of the five years.

As part of this project, the City provided a list of current treatment types used within their rehabilitation and reconstruction work. DTS recommended the preservation activities since the City did not have a current preservation plan. The list included the cost for each treatment type per square yard. This inventory of the City's recent activities, budgets, conditions, and decision matrices was compiled and reviewed as part of this analysis. Table 7 lists the treatment types and costs entered in the VUEWorks® AMS and used in the budget analyses.

Table 7: Treatments, Activities, and Costs
Treatment Type Activity Impact PCI Range Cost Per SY
Local Repair Crack Sealing 5 Points 86-95 $1.50
Preservation Slurry Seal/Chip Seal/Cape Seal 90 Fixed 65-85 $6.50 Minor Rehabilitation 2" Mill & Overlay 100 Fixed 55-64 $20.50 Major Rehabilitation 4" Mill & Overlay 100 Fixed 40-54 $58.00 Reconstruction Pulverize in Place 100 Fixed 0-39 $82.00 176
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 26 | P a g e

7.2 5-Year Baseline Scenario
At the time of inspection, October of 2022, the average network PCI for the City's asphalt roads was

55. The PCI is projected to be 51 in 2023 as well. If no work is performed over the next five years, this PCI rating is expected to decrease to 28, as displayed in Figure 14.

Figure 14: 5-Year Baseline Scenario – PCI Plot
177
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 27 | P a g e

7.3 5-Year Current Budget Scenario – Worst First
The five-year current budget scenario (Worst First) assumes the existing City budget of $2.5 million per year is available for all road maintenance. In this scenario, the roads in the worst condition (lowest PCI value) are targeted first. Figures 15 and Table 8 display the average PCI and total funded costs, respectively. Table 9 lists the treatment activities with the required costs and miles.

Figure 15: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – PCI Plot Table 8: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – Total Funded Plan Cost Year Avg. PCI Cost Miles
2023 57 $2,499,997.29 3.68
2024 55 $2,499,961.51 3.73
2025 51 $2,499,956.39 3.75
2026 47 $2,499,961.90 3.51
2027 43 $2,499,945.96 3.35
178
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 28 | P a g e
Table 9: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – Activities Breakdown 2023
Activity Total Cost Total
Miles
Percentage of Total
Cost
Percentage of Total
Miles
Local Repair $53.40 0.00 0.00% 0.05%
Preservation $296.59 0.00 0.01% 0.06%
Minor Rehabilitation $751,957.74 2.18 30.08% 59.34%
Major Rehabilitation $873,932.29 0.83 34.96% 22.68%
Reconstruction $873,757.27 0.66 34.95% 17.86%
2024
Local Repair $70.50 0.00 0.00% 0.06%
Preservation $1,512.74 0.01 0.06% 0.39%
Minor Rehabilitation $752,637.29 2.25 30.11% 60.31%
Major Rehabilitation $872,772.11 0.91 34.91% 24.41%
Reconstruction $872,968.87 0.55 34.92% 14.82%
2025
Local Repair $360.14 0.01 0.01% 0.40%
Preservation $1,201.71 0.01 0.05% 0.24%
Minor Rehabilitation $754,925.66 2.16 30.20% 57.51%
Major Rehabilitation $871,938.43 0.88 34.88% 23.50%
Reconstruction $871,530.45 0.69 34.86% 18.35%
2026
Local Repair $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Preservation $2,754.99 0.02 0.11% 0.70%
Minor Rehabilitation $760,609.55 2.07 30.42% 59.03%
Major Rehabilitation $863,886.84 0.82 34.56% 23.43%
Reconstruction $872,710.52 0.59 34.91% 16.84%
2027
Local Repair $203.13 0.01 0.01% 0.20%
Preservation $7,591.64 0.05 0.30% 1.64%
Minor Rehabilitation $758,044.78 1.85 30.32% 55.33%
Major Rehabilitation $863,491.25 0.86 34.54% 25.68%
Reconstruction $870,615.16 0.57 34.83% 17.15%
179
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 29 | P a g e
Figures 16 and 17 display the distribution of costs and miles per activity.

Figure 16: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – Distribution of Cost per Activity 180
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 30 | P a g e
Figure 17: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First) – Distribution of Miles per Activity Synopsis:

The City's PCI would initially increase to 57 but decrease to 43 by 2027 if it utilized its current annual budget using the Worst First methodology. In this scenario, the City's street segments with the lowest PCI values within each category would be targeted first based on the listed available budget. The benefit of this scenario is that the worst conditions are addressed first, which would help reduce the backlog. However, this scenario's negative effect is that few preservation treatments are being performed, and most of the budget is spent on rehabilitation and reconstruction treatments.

Additionally, the number of miles treated in this scenario is significantly lower than in any of the other scenarios presented. This is typically not a preferred methodology because these activities are the most expensive, and this approach will likely never catch up with the demand. Better roads are rarely preserved and will continue to deteriorate into the most costly maintenance categories. 181
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 31 | P a g e

7.4 5-Year Current Budget Scenario – Best First
This budget scenario was set up to assume that the City has an existing budget of $2.5 million annually available for all road maintenance. In contrast to the Worst First methodology, this scenario first targets the roads in better condition (highest PCI value). Figure 18 and Table 10 display the average PCI and total funded costs, respectively. Table 11 lists the treatment activities with the required costs and miles.

Figure 18: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – PCI Plot Table 10: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – Total Funded Plan Cost Year Avg. PCI Cost Miles
2023 58 $2,499,732.22 22.99
2024 56 $2,498,281.24 15.13
2025 52 $2,498,181.16 10.38
2026 48 $2,495,932.88 5.26
2027 44 $2,499,456.65 8.81
182
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 32 | P a g e
Table 11: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – Activities Breakdown 2023
Activity Total Cost Total
Miles
Percentage of Total
Cost
Percentage of Total
Miles
Local Repair $374,917.28 14.59 15.00% 63.48%
Preservation $374,996.93 3.03 15.00% 13.16%
Minor Rehabilitation $1,749,818.01 5.37 70.00% 23.36%
Major Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Reconstruction $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
2024
Local Repair $200,325.08 6.61 8.02% 43.66%
Preservation $374,503.69 2.77 14.99% 18.33%
Minor Rehabilitation $1,921,179.32 5.75 76.90% 38.00%
Major Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Reconstruction $2,273.15 0.00 0.09% 0.01%
2025
Local Repair $89,016.64 2.77 3.56% 26.71%
Preservation $360,043.12 3.02 14.41% 29.11%
Minor Rehabilitation $1,494,289.93 4.03 59.82% 38.85%
Major Rehabilitation $554,831.47 0.55 22.21% 5.33%
Reconstruction $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
2026
Local Repair $93,510.27 3.37 3.75% 64.00%
Preservation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Minor Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Major Rehabilitation $1,094,873.17 1.06 43.87% 20.21%
Reconstruction $1,307,549.44 0.83 52.39% 15.80%
2027
Local Repair $198,385.76 7.27 7.94% 82.52%
Preservation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Minor Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Major Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Reconstruction $2,301,070.89 1.54 92.06% 17.48%
183
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 33 | P a g e
Figures 19 and 20 display the distribution of costs and miles per activity.

Figure 19: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – Distribution of Cost per Activity 184
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 34 | P a g e
Figure 20: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First) – Distribution of Miles per Activity Synopsis:

In the five-year current budget scenario (Best First), the overall network PCI is projected to decrease throughout the five-year period, ranging from a high of 58 to a low of 44. This option would be feasible if the City utilized its current annual budget using the Best First methodology. In this scenario, the City's road segments with the highest PCI values would be targeted first; hence, most projects consist of preservation and local repair treatments. This is an excellent option to increase the network's PCI and the number of miles treated. However, a small percentage of road segments in very poor to serious conditions will not be treated, and they will continue to deteriorate, increasing the City's backlog for maintenance. A recommendation is to implement a preservation strategy for the roads that received major rehabilitation and reconstruction to extend their pavement's life while trying to minimize the City's backlog.
185
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 35 | P a g e

7.5 5-Year Budget Scenario – Target PCI of 65
This budget scenario was set up to increase the average network PCI value to 65 at the end of the five years, assuming an unlimited budget is available. VUEWorks recommends spending funds on roadway needs as dictated by the constraints within the software. The level of spending is increased to improve the condition values. However, due to the variable costs of treatments, an exact value of 65 may not be maintained. Figures 21 and Table 12 display the average PCI and total funded costs, respectively. Table 13 lists the treatment activities with the required costs and miles.

Figure 21: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – PCI Plot Table 12: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – Total Funded Plan Cost Year Avg. PCI Cost Miles
2023 64 $9,998,571.72 51.46
2024 65 $9,997,730.04 24.93
2025 63 $9,998,915.67 6.91
2026 63 $9,994,950.92 6.51
2027 65 $9,995,474.29 25.79
186
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 36 | P a g e
Table 13: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – Activities Breakdown 2023
Activity Total Cost Total
Miles
Percentage of Total
Cost
Percentage of Total
Miles
Local Repair $511,765.33 19.25 5.12% 37.40%
Preservation $1,697,626.72 14.66 16.98% 28.49%
Minor Rehabilitation $4,728,406.12 14.43 47.29% 28.05%
Major Rehabilitation $3,060,773.55 3.12 30.61% 6.06%
Reconstruction $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
2024
Local Repair $408,003.33 14.84 4.08% 59.52%
Preservation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Minor Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Major Rehabilitation $9,577,533.66 10.09 95.80% 40.45%
Reconstruction $12,193.05 0.01 0.12% 0.03%
2025
Local Repair $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Preservation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Minor Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Major Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Reconstruction $9,998,915.67 6.91 100.00% 100.00%
2026
Local Repair $7,930.78 0.35 0.08% 5.30%
Preservation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Minor Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Major Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Reconstruction $9,987,020.14 6.16 99.92% 94.70%
2027
Local Repair $532,778.28 19.46 5.33% 75.45%
Preservation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Minor Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Major Rehabilitation $0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
Reconstruction $9,462,696.01 6.33 94.67% 24.55%
187
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 37 | P a g e
Figures 22 and 23 display the distribution of costs and miles per activity, respectively.

Figure 22: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – Distribution of Cost per Activity 188
C i t y of S o u t h L a k e T a h o e , C A – P a v e m e n t C o n d i t i o n R e p o r t 38 | P a g e
Figure 23: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65) – Distribution of Miles per Activity Synopsis:

In this scenario, the goal is to reach an overall network PCI of 65 within five years. This option would be feasible if the City utilized the annual budget shown in Table 12. This demonstrates that preservation can be an effective method for maintaining the good, satisfactory, and fair roads. Still, major rehabilitation and reconstruction will eventually be required to keep the network condition levels high. Also, this scenario provides a continual decrease in the unfunded values to illustrate at this level, and the City will eventually reduce the backlog of maintenance needs and eventually attain a preventive and rehabilitation only philosophy. Remember that the overall PCI score may not always be the best indicator of a robust maintenance strategy. 189

APPENDIX A

SEGMENT LEVEL PCI DATA
190
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 13679 10TH ST 256.21 24 AC 56 FAIR 267
13700 10TH ST 368.05 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 319
13822 10TH ST 271.90 24 AC 24 SERIOUS 367
13927 10TH ST 444.62 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 258
13928 10TH ST 437.79 26 AC 31 VERY POOR 235
13929 10TH ST 250.99 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 253
13968 10TH ST 282.44 26 AC 49 POOR 249
14381 10TH ST 352.85 26 AC 45 POOR 206
22728 10TH ST 322.41 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 258
13678 11TH ST 246.56 26 AC 28 VERY POOR 322
13820 11TH ST 281.25 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 262
13702 12TH ST 255.16 30 AC 71 SATISFACTORY 199
13703 12TH ST 384.67 30 AC 46 POOR 238
13704 12TH ST 342.32 30 AC 65 FAIR 256
13705 12TH ST 366.11 30 AC 54 POOR 191
13706 12TH ST 331.88 30 AC 53 POOR 229
13909 12TH ST 244.67 28 AC 38 VERY POOR 324
13910 12TH ST 182.06 28 AC 37 VERY POOR 298
22677 12TH ST 280.62 30 AC 39 VERY POOR 312
13670 13TH ST 203.15 28 AC 54 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13671 13TH ST 254.67 28 AC 53 POOR 223
13816 13TH ST 279.39 28 AC 58 FAIR 264
13934 13TH ST 449.98 26 AC 95 GOOD 210
14387 13TH ST 246.62 26 AC 60 FAIR 195
18894 13TH ST 263.76 26 AC 44 POOR 252
18895 13TH ST 260.00 26 AC 46 POOR 266
22697 13TH ST 249.23 26 AC 95 GOOD 225
22704 13TH ST 444.10 26 AC 95 GOOD 191
22714 13TH ST 278.22 26 AC 95 GOOD 274
22729 13TH ST 351.47 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 252
22949 13TH ST 254.73 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 236
22950 13TH ST 257.96 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 324
13664 15TH ST 1423.68 22 AC 99 GOOD 230
13665 15TH ST 1423.26 22 AC 100 GOOD 205
13666 15TH ST 116.26 36 AC 99 GOOD 217
13667 15TH ST 267.57 24 AC 100 GOOD 221
13809 15TH ST 409.98 46 AC 100 GOOD 193
13814 15TH ST 281.95 24 AC 100 GOOD 210
13972 15TH ST 269.97 26 AC 43 POOR 234
22692 15TH ST 247.67 26 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 184
13781 2ND ST 244.86 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 293
13835 2ND ST 280.46 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 250
13758 3RD ST 246.45 24 AC 100 GOOD 208
13831 3RD ST 295.79 36 AC 94 GOOD 260
22652 3RD ST 471.33 24 AC 100 GOOD 190
22654 3RD ST 447.70 24 AC 100 GOOD 149
22665 3RD ST 359.83 36 AC 95 GOOD 182
22668 3RD ST 1006.10 26 AC 95 GOOD 157
22669 3RD ST 471.62 36 AC 95 GOOD 169
22682 3RD ST 282.17 24 AC 99 GOOD 279
13785 4TH ST 250.51 28 AC 95 GOOD 186
13797 4TH ST 1005.64 28 AC 95 GOOD 152
22681 4TH ST 278.56 28 AC 95 GOOD 195
13806 5TH ST 251.35 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 326
13825 5TH ST 276.53 26 AC 21 SERIOUS 348
13963 5TH ST 274.72 26 AC 95 GOOD 275
13682 7TH ST 251.88 26 AC 47 POOR 272
13823 7TH ST 281.61 26 AC 31 VERY POOR 339
13908 8TH ST 251.05 26 AC 87 GOOD 220
13965 8TH ST 280.98 26 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 248
14376 AGATE ST 349.66 26 AC 64 FAIR 251
13997 AL TAHOE BLVD 419.28 60 AC 90 GOOD 145
13998 AL TAHOE BLVD 1451.15 28 AC 91 GOOD 119
14835 AL TAHOE BLVD 1959.43 28 AC 86 GOOD 98
14836 AL TAHOE BLVD 2640.53 28 AC 91 GOOD 116
23329 AL TAHOE BLVD 1715.31 46 AC 91 GOOD 100
13565 ALA WAI BLVD 1106.92 22 AC 58 FAIR 208
13566 ALA WAI BLVD 1153.60 22 AC 73 SATISFACTORY 229
24995 ALA WAI BLVD 1197.55 22 AC 34 VERY POOR 157
24996 ALA WAI BLVD 1049.25 22 AC 43 POOR -1 IRI DATA IS NOT STATISTICALLY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONDITION OF THE SEGMENT 14334 ALAMEDA AVE 456.02 24 AC 65 FAIR 243
14344 ALAMEDA AVE 429.81 24 AC 65 FAIR 237
14353 ALAMEDA AVE 442.49 24 AC 57 FAIR 201
14367 ALAMEDA AVE 455.67 24 AC 54 POOR 220
14368 ALAMEDA AVE 372.42 24 AC 96 GOOD 165 ONE WAY
14392 ALAMEDA AVE 65.68 24 AC 92 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14549 ALAMEDA AVE 446.75 24 AC 47 POOR 242
14560 ALAMEDA AVE 448.90 24 AC 32 VERY POOR 213
14561 ALAMEDA AVE 441.24 24 AC 45 POOR 223
13690 ALBERT AVE 607.41 24 AC 25 SERIOUS 311
14915 ALDER AVE 670.09 24 AC 44 POOR 232
14992 ALDER AVE 646.01 24 AC 75 SATISFACTORY 242
15002 ALDER AVE 646.97 24 AC 19 SERIOUS 302
15060 ALDER AVE 682.96 24 AC 36 VERY POOR 254
14765 ALLEN RAE PL 167.16 28 AC 18 SERIOUS -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14231 ALMA AVE 325.01 26 AC 66 FAIR 216
191
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 14232 ALMA AVE 435.04 26 AC 55 POOR 205
14233 ALMA AVE 518.20 26 AC 63 FAIR 172
14234 ALMA AVE 506.90 26 AC 62 FAIR 213
14235 ALMA AVE 438.59 26 AC 61 FAIR 210
14236 ALMA AVE 490.27 26 AC 56 FAIR 255
14237 ALMA AVE 216.18 26 AC 54 POOR 308
13556 ALOHA DR 815.56 34 AC 92 GOOD 197
13558 ALOHA DR 260.13 34 AC 90 GOOD 256
13559 ALOHA DR 408.31 34 AC 89 GOOD 233
14784 ALOHA RD 1367.19 26 AC 22 SERIOUS 289
13551 ALPINE DR 135.32 36 AC 35 VERY POOR 243
13554 ALPINE DR 429.93 36 AC 47 POOR 234
22610 ALPINE DR 711.37 36 AC 40 VERY POOR 227
22612 ALPINE DR 284.89 36 AC 37 VERY POOR 243
14763 ANDY JO CIR 868.74 28 AC 33 VERY POOR 326
14809 ANGORA LAKE RD 1382.02 28 AC 42 POOR 211
13686 ANITA DR 1230.10 24 AC 44 POOR 274
13689 ANITA DR 282.83 24 AC 41 POOR 238
13692 ANITA DR 189.30 24 AC 43 POOR 313
13695 ANITA DR 289.19 24 AC 40 VERY POOR 271
13696 ANITA DR 1826.44 24 AC 58 FAIR 223
14889 ANNE ST 552.66 26 AC 49 POOR 229
19009 APPLE ST 582.48 26 AC 26 VERY POOR 238
14894 APRIL DR 814.09 26 AC 42 POOR 260
14901 APRIL DR 752.28 26 AC 43 POOR 308
14282 ARGONAUT AVE 270.48 28 AC 38 VERY POOR 265
14283 ARGONAUT AVE 279.13 28 AC 36 VERY POOR 299
14515 ARGONAUT AVE 136.32 28 AC 36 VERY POOR 597
22760 ARGONAUT AVE 49.83 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 439
19019 ARIZONA AVE 646.96 26 AC 53 POOR 250
14056 ARMSTRONG AVE 166.10 24 AC 77 SATISFACTORY 234
14132 ARMSTRONG AVE 441.07 26 AC 57 FAIR 210
14133 ARMSTRONG AVE 506.38 26 AC 54 POOR 225
14134 ARMSTRONG AVE 511.54 26 AC 65 FAIR 201
14135 ARMSTRONG AVE 444.57 26 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 214
14136 ARMSTRONG AVE 486.23 26 AC 76 SATISFACTORY 182
14137 ARMSTRONG AVE 538.53 26 AC 76 SATISFACTORY 211
14278 ARMSTRONG AVE 180.59 26 AC 51 POOR 241
14279 ARMSTRONG AVE 95.47 26 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 265
14661 ASH AVE 577.39 26 AC 42 POOR 283
14917 ASPEN AVE 671.97 26 AC 53 POOR 261
14993 ASPEN AVE 614.41 26 AC 62 FAIR 226
15061 ASPEN AVE 671.45 26 AC 48 POOR 249
22804 ASPEN AVE 656.24 26 AC 49 POOR 233
14981 ASPENWALD RD 178.89 26 AC 62 FAIR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14982 ASPENWALD RD 546.85 26 AC 57 FAIR 253
15032 ASPENWALD RD 168.02 26 AC 69 FAIR 225
22750 AZURE AVE 265.24 15 AC 36 VERY POOR 271
22752 AZURE AVE 424.44 24 AC 36 VERY POOR 257
22753 AZURE AVE 847.80 28 AC 46 POOR 265
13801 B ST 412.78 38 AC 94 GOOD 166
13848 B ST 523.13 38 AC 17 SERIOUS 280
13880 B ST 460.15 26 AC 21 SERIOUS 295
13890 B ST 348.97 26 AC 46 POOR 249
22374 B ST 244.43 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 239
22375 B ST 244.99 26 AC 58 FAIR 267
19005 BAL BIJOU RD 799.71 26 AC 86 GOOD 210
18952 BALBOA DR 1240.51 28 AC 29 VERY POOR 321
13762 BARTON AVE 254.11 30 AC 31 VERY POOR 281
13789 BARTON AVE 428.99 26 AC 47 POOR 319
22656 BARTON AVE 97.20 30 AC 34 VERY POOR 542
22660 BARTON AVE 664.11 26 AC 41 POOR 279
22662 BARTON AVE 368.46 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 295
22664 BARTON AVE 658.96 26 AC 43 POOR 245
13579 BEACH DR 1399.84 28 AC 58 FAIR 238
22617 BEACH DR 790.02 28 AC 40 VERY POOR 272
13580 BEACH LN 260.15 28 AC 43 POOR 276
14776 BECKA DR 1720.95 26 AC 70 FAIR 204
14082 BEECHER AVE 106.98 26 AC 71 SATISFACTORY 206
14083 BEECHER AVE 240.03 26 AC 70 FAIR 276
14084 BEECHER AVE 234.32 26 AC 68 FAIR 253
14085 BEECHER AVE 249.27 26 AC 43 POOR 317
16553 BELLAMY CT 76.27 28 AC 63 FAIR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 16573 BELLAMY CT 915.31 26 AC 68 FAIR 250
14302 BELLEVUE AVE 275.55 28 AC 55 POOR 180
14303 BELLEVUE AVE 242.87 28 AC 67 FAIR 221
14306 BELLEVUE AVE 241.71 28 AC 46 POOR 231
14307 BELLEVUE AVE 129.25 28 AC 45 POOR 310
14308 BELLEVUE AVE 559.38 28 AC 45 POOR 271
14414 BELLEVUE AVE 278.49 28 AC 62 FAIR 242
14417 BELLEVUE AVE 224.11 28 AC 29 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14418 BELLEVUE AVE 31.07 28 AC 19 SERIOUS -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14582 BELLEVUE AVE 283.11 28 AC 58 FAIR 278
14606 BELLEVUE AVE 287.40 28 AC 42 POOR 288
14435 BERKELEY AVE 316.97 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 309
14513 BERKELEY AVE 241.95 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 257
192
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 14552 BERKELEY AVE 276.17 24 AC 28 VERY POOR 340
14553 BERKELEY AVE 278.55 24 AC 35 VERY POOR 263
14554 BERKELEY AVE 276.79 24 AC 46 POOR 254
14555 BERKELEY AVE 283.73 24 AC 47 POOR 302
14556 BERKELEY AVE 241.06 24 AC 23 SERIOUS 299
14599 BERKELEY AVE 242.83 24 AC 21 SERIOUS 321
14600 BERKELEY AVE 247.01 24 AC 44 POOR 273
14158 BERTHA AVE 443.19 26 AC 54 POOR 214
14159 BERTHA AVE 508.12 26 AC 46 POOR 223
14160 BERTHA AVE 508.65 26 AC 48 POOR 156
14161 BERTHA AVE 445.44 26 AC 55 POOR 203
14162 BERTHA AVE 484.79 26 AC 65 FAIR 201
14163 BERTHA AVE 540.90 26 AC 61 FAIR 209
14164 BERTHA AVE 280.75 26 AC 44 POOR 318
14827 BETTY RAE LN 208.58 26 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 295
14850 BETTY RAE LN 427.58 26 AC 42 POOR 292
19018 BIG PINE AVE 634.76 26 AC 41 POOR 335
19001 BIGLER AVE 744.59 22 AC 35 VERY POOR 270
14865 BILL AVE 627.16 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 296
15005 BIRCH AVE 659.10 24 AC 58 FAIR 221
15063 BIRCH AVE 670.22 24 AC 51 POOR 264
22769 BIRCH AVE 675.76 24 AC 30 VERY POOR 289
14478 BLACK ROCK RD 324.34 22 AC 66 FAIR 259
14746 BLACKWOOD RD 558.29 28 AC 38 VERY POOR 270
14830 BLACKWOOD RD 279.12 28 AC 38 VERY POOR 259
14854 BLACKWOOD RD 498.07 28 AC 32 VERY POOR 258
14871 BLACKWOOD RD 1216.76 28 AC 48 POOR 238
22786 BLACKWOOD RD 979.39 28 AC 40 VERY POOR 241
14052 BLUE LAKE AVE 1203.99 24 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 178
14272 BLUE LAKE AVE 268.50 28 AC 70 FAIR 249
22781 BOBBY GREY CIR 213.02 22 AC 19 SERIOUS 396
22788 BOBBY GREY CIR 239.51 22 AC 16 SERIOUS -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 22789 BOBBY GREY CIR 519.65 22 AC 24 SERIOUS 311
14887 BODE DR 754.58 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 288
14893 BODE DR 814.55 26 AC 43 POOR 250
13877 BONANZA AVE 983.16 26 AC 23 SERIOUS 371
22368 BONANZA AVE 635.71 24 AC 28 VERY POOR 328
22370 BONANZA AVE 1436.30 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 295
22371 BONANZA AVE 1147.61 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 327
15079 BONITA RD 937.59 24 AC 93 GOOD 197
15080 BONITA RD 1308.39 24 AC 90 GOOD 215
14847 BOWERS AVE 143.24 24 AC 44 POOR 266
14857 BOWERS AVE 67.60 24 AC 52 POOR 255
14858 BOWERS AVE 177.85 24 AC 48 POOR 204
14860 BOWERS AVE 82.70 24 AC 40 VERY POOR 225
14861 BOWERS AVE 172.15 24 AC 43 POOR 199
14863 BOWERS AVE 146.74 24 AC 44 POOR 311
22768 BOWERS AVE 252.53 24 AC 19 SERIOUS 252
22784 BOWERS AVE 119.98 24 AC 57 FAIR 176
22790 BOWERS AVE 102.01 24 AC 50 POOR 271
24443 BOWERS AVE 236.64 24 AC 40 VERY POOR 264
14724 BOZEMAN DR 876.65 26 AC 66 FAIR 237
14947 BRIAN LN 543.74 28 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 194
15077 BRIDLE RD 369.65 26 AC 89 GOOD 245
15078 BRIDLE RD 246.54 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 332
23366 BRIDLE RD 305.11 26 AC 93 GOOD 230
14000 BROCKWAY AVE 653.39 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 318
14269 BROCKWAY AVE 287.37 26 AC 65 FAIR 349 ONE WAY
14775 BRUCE DR 1611.57 26 AC 52 POOR 223
19017 BUTLER AVE 853.24 26 AC 52 POOR 268
24455 C ST 539.60 24 AC 57 FAIR 219
19022 CALIFORNIA AVE 1520.77 22 AC 38 VERY POOR 231
19837 CANDLEWOOD DR 578.95 32 AC 43 POOR 258
14654 CAPE HORN RD 407.98 26 AC 59 FAIR 199
14655 CAPE HORN RD 307.79 26 AC 67 FAIR 239
14662 CAPE HORN RD 234.10 26 AC 26 VERY POOR 245
23350 CAPE HORN RD 104.64 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 294
14425 CAPISTRANO AVE 174.08 24 AC 41 POOR 367
14431 CAPISTRANO AVE 444.60 24 AC 49 POOR 318
23341 CAPISTRANO AVE 396.37 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 286
23342 CAPISTRANO AVE 445.35 24 AC 30 VERY POOR 315
13518 CAPRI DR 31.56 28 AC 22 SERIOUS 222
13569 CAPRI DR 160.80 28 AC 25 SERIOUS 338
13576 CAPRI DR 207.71 28 AC 38 VERY POOR 255
22613 CAPRI DR 399.87 28 AC 22 SERIOUS 288
22614 CAPRI DR 397.57 28 AC 21 SERIOUS 295
22615 CAPRI DR 205.25 28 AC 26 VERY POOR 341
14058 CARSON AVE 163.62 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 356
14095 CARSON AVE 238.76 26 AC 53 POOR 341
14105 CARSON AVE 243.17 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 276
14116 CARSON AVE 238.65 26 AC 45 POOR 169
14128 CARSON AVE 236.93 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 263
14140 CARSON AVE 242.33 26 AC 46 POOR 202
14154 CARSON AVE 239.72 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 296
14166 CARSON AVE 237.80 26 AC 44 POOR 246
14177 CARSON AVE 246.79 26 AC 47 POOR 348
193
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 14194 CARSON AVE 220.40 26 AC 47 POOR 271
14207 CARSON AVE 241.62 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 273
14221 CARSON AVE 237.17 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 312
14222 CARSON AVE 236.34 26 AC 55 POOR 280
14267 CARSON AVE 43.94 32 AC 93 GOOD 507
13560 CARSON CT 259.59 30 AC 20 SERIOUS 288
22611 CASCADE CT 440.52 30 AC 36 VERY POOR 226
18951 CATALINA DR 1314.92 28 AC 38 VERY POOR 306
13552 CATHEDRAL CT 212.84 30 AC 36 VERY POOR 330
19000 CAVE ROCK AVE 791.84 22 AC 31 VERY POOR 308
14469 CEDAR AVE 449.35 24 AC 60 FAIR 325
14506 CEDAR AVE 271.14 32 AC 54 POOR 304
14507 CEDAR AVE 251.40 24 AC 54 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14508 CEDAR AVE 586.53 26 AC 65 FAIR 279
14509 CEDAR AVE 641.97 34 AC 53 POOR 273
15393 CELLADOR RD 491.59 20 AC 61 FAIR 319
19979 CHAMPLAIN DR 516.45 28 AC 43 POOR 242
19999 CHAMPLAIN DR 520.81 28 AC 48 POOR 240
14138 CHARLES AVE 230.84 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 281
23300 CHARLES AVE 251.51 26 AC 49 POOR 305
23307 CHARLES AVE 239.80 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 333
23308 CHARLES AVE 248.29 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 301
14867 CHARLESWORTH CT 305.48 24 AC 40 VERY POOR 318
14929 CHONOKIS RD 235.39 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 207
14934 CHONOKIS RD 674.18 28 AC 94 GOOD 219
14935 CHONOKIS RD 197.12 26 AC 92 GOOD 302
14099 CHRIS AVE 443.02 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 267
14100 CHRIS AVE 511.53 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 297
14101 CHRIS AVE 510.13 26 AC 64 FAIR 250
14102 CHRIS AVE 445.20 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 290
14103 CHRIS AVE 471.82 26 AC 29 VERY POOR 295
13528 CHRISTIE DR 485.19 34 AC 31 VERY POOR 248
13529 CHRISTIE DR 360.26 34 AC 29 VERY POOR 271
22603 CHRISTIE DR 436.12 34 AC 34 VERY POOR 265
22604 CHRISTIE DR 720.60 34 AC 59 FAIR 273
13920 CLEMENT ST 1470.37 26 AC 50 POOR 296
14244 CLEMENT ST 913.58 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 328
22702 CLEMENT ST 807.80 26 AC 52 POOR 268
22703 CLEMENT ST 736.76 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 293
22720 CLEMENT ST 220.45 26 AC 29 VERY POOR 379
18984 CLOVERDALE AVE 549.96 26 AC 42 POOR 250
13603 COLORADO AVE 195.80 34 AC 37 VERY POOR 293
13604 COLORADO AVE 440.60 34 AC 42 POOR 228
22621 COLORADO AVE 252.52 34 AC 54 POOR 285
22626 COLORADO AVE 829.83 34 AC 65 FAIR 236
13602 COLORADO CT 160.53 34 AC 31 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 19012 COMSTOCK WAY 402.53 24 AC 58 FAIR 226
14042 CONESTOGA ST 270.52 24 AC 58 FAIR 277
14044 CONESTOGA ST 533.26 24 AC 57 FAIR 277
23288 CONESTOGA ST 444.19 24 AC 42 POOR 299
19023 COUNCIL ROCK DR 1136.11 28 AC 44 POOR 303
14650 CRAIG AVE 550.44 26 AC 41 POOR 235
23348 CRAIG AVE 524.84 26 AC 52 POOR 230
14021 CREEKWOOD DR 211.17 36 AC 51 POOR 223
23278 CREEKWOOD DR 728.25 36 AC 54 POOR 200
23279 CREEKWOOD DR 106.80 36 AC 50 POOR 273
15076 CREST RD 1368.21 24 AC 55 POOR 264
15227 CREST RD 733.58 24 AC 93 GOOD 274
18954 CRYSTAL CT 299.37 30 AC 78 SATISFACTORY 316
13883 D ST 462.91 26 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 156
13891 D ST 344.21 26 AC 75 SATISFACTORY 192
13959 D ST 533.85 26 AC 73 SATISFACTORY 195
22369 D ST 1125.35 32 AC 35 VERY POOR 185
22376 D ST 243.20 26 AC 68 FAIR 275
22377 D ST 244.28 26 AC 69 FAIR 248
22378 D ST 509.15 32 AC 33 VERY POOR 237
22379 D ST 369.18 32 AC 22 SERIOUS 247
18953 DAGGETT CT 248.91 30 AC 23 SERIOUS 363
19016 DANA CT 102.83 30 AC 28 VERY POOR 255
13523 DANUBE DR 395.08 28 AC 25 SERIOUS 295
22600 DANUBE DR 403.95 28 AC 24 SERIOUS 238
22809 DAVID LN 978.30 26 AC 46 POOR 284
13892 DEDI AVE 1446.28 24 AC 55 POOR 222
13895 DEDI AVE 89.83 24 AC 12 SERIOUS -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 22372 DEDI AVE 1161.85 24 AC 39 VERY POOR 281
22373 DEDI AVE 233.07 24 AC 50 POOR 282
18983 DEER LN 594.90 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 280
14647 DEER PARK AVE 300.17 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 219
14658 DEER PARK AVE 556.34 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 265
14659 DEER PARK AVE 254.32 26 AC 55 POOR 246
13875 DELTA ST 242.20 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 299
13888 DELTA ST 244.88 24 AC 36 VERY POOR 291
13889 DELTA ST 351.35 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 276
18981 DICK LAKE RD 637.73 28 AC 82 SATISFACTORY 194
14973 DONNER LN 638.71 30 AC 41 POOR 307
18996 DOT ST 248.66 26 AC 21 SERIOUS 318
194
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 13505 DOVER DR 34.03 30 AC 95 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 24136 DOVER DR 127.28 30 AC 53 POOR 159
24137 DOVER DR 126.26 30 AC 39 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13734 DUNLAP DR 137.43 26 AC 52 POOR 187
13736 DUNLAP DR 224.08 26 AC 60 FAIR 178
13740 DUNLAP DR 220.06 26 AC 64 FAIR 198
13743 DUNLAP DR 228.44 26 AC 61 FAIR 257
13751 DUNLAP DR 128.53 32 AC 58 FAIR 251
13752 DUNLAP DR 134.40 38 AC 47 POOR 256
13827 DUNLAP DR 522.01 38 AC 45 POOR 209
22645 DUNLAP DR 457.55 26 AC 67 FAIR 173
22646 DUNLAP DR 437.93 26 AC 53 POOR 249
13800 E ST 465.75 24 AC 19 SERIOUS 315
13852 E ST 117.71 24 AC 61 FAIR 390
15022 ECHO RD 578.32 24 AC 50 POOR 173
15071 ECHO RD 443.75 26 AC 46 POOR 226
14412 EDGEWOOD CIR 341.56 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 51
23330 EDGEWOOD CIR 852.65 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 315
23331 EDGEWOOD CIR 68.94 24 AC 40 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 24472 EDGEWOOD CIR 270.05 28 AC 46 POOR 296
14294 EDGEWOOD WAY 142.72 24 AC 53 POOR 377
14728 EDNA ST 131.10 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 334
14899 EDNA ST 513.84 26 AC 46 POOR 308
14296 EL DORADO AVE 247.77 26 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 291
14420 EL DORADO AVE 393.07 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 305
14421 EL DORADO AVE 265.86 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 313
14423 EL DORADO AVE 396.01 26 AC 48 POOR 295
14516 EL DORADO AVE 495.53 24 AC 32 VERY POOR 316
14517 EL DORADO AVE 101.21 26 AC 45 POOR 324
14518 EL DORADO AVE 652.78 26 AC 57 FAIR 290
22730 EL DORADO AVE 547.72 26 AC 35 VERY POOR 298
22731 EL DORADO AVE 120.82 26 AC 28 VERY POOR 341
13775 ELM AVE 259.94 30 AC 27 VERY POOR 297
13655 ELOISE AVE 1041.30 26 AC 94 GOOD 251
13668 ELOISE AVE 665.91 24 AC 64 FAIR 228
13684 ELOISE AVE 953.43 24 AC 51 POOR 201
13753 ELOISE AVE 299.42 26 AC 95 GOOD 198
22632 ELOISE AVE 1138.00 24 AC 52 POOR 209
22633 ELOISE AVE 696.88 24 AC 35 VERY POOR 217
22634 ELOISE AVE 722.73 24 AC 39 VERY POOR 207
22635 ELOISE AVE 779.25 24 AC 54 POOR 243
22636 ELOISE AVE 570.46 24 AC 37 VERY POOR 261
22655 ELOISE AVE 1092.66 26 AC 95 GOOD 178
22683 ELOISE AVE 1084.23 26 AC 90 GOOD 224
18979 ELVA CT 519.18 24 AC 53 POOR 261
14120 ELWOOD AVE 441.33 26 AC 57 FAIR 282
14121 ELWOOD AVE 508.72 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 338
14122 ELWOOD AVE 508.89 26 AC 27 VERY POOR 333
14123 ELWOOD AVE 440.23 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 291
14124 ELWOOD AVE 486.85 26 AC 29 VERY POOR 313
14125 ELWOOD AVE 549.11 26 AC 51 POOR 286
13538 EMERALD DR 412.36 34 AC 52 POOR 243
13544 EMERALD DR 661.63 34 AC 50 POOR 247
22607 EMERALD DR 501.11 34 AC 48 POOR 241
13870 F ST 248.33 22 AC 21 SERIOUS 290
13876 F ST 233.82 22 AC 31 VERY POOR 223
13881 F ST 351.52 22 AC 45 POOR 236
13882 F ST 460.18 22 AC 44 POOR 243
13956 F ST 537.67 22 AC 51 POOR 247
14735 FAIRWAY AVE 162.65 28 AC 93 GOOD 252
14736 FAIRWAY AVE 62.45 28 AC 95 GOOD 221
14738 FAIRWAY AVE 291.46 28 AC 50 POOR 236
14741 FAIRWAY AVE 291.07 28 AC 62 FAIR 207
14744 FAIRWAY AVE 171.26 28 AC 47 POOR 230
14747 FAIRWAY AVE 296.58 28 AC 45 POOR 207
14750 FAIRWAY AVE 285.38 28 AC 46 POOR 238
14754 FAIRWAY AVE 877.51 28 AC 47 POOR 276
14843 FAIRWAY AVE 297.74 28 AC 51 POOR 232
14840 FAIRWAY DR 727.33 26 AC 95 GOOD 188
14737 FAWN WAY 640.14 28 AC 30 VERY POOR 277
14922 FERN RD 423.47 22 AC 47 POOR 187
22793 FERN RD 437.75 28 AC 42 POOR 235
14743 FERNDALE AVE 549.16 26 AC 52 POOR 224
14949 FIGUEROA LN 640.09 28 AC 71 SATISFACTORY 270
14665 FIR AVE 588.67 26 AC 50 POOR 315
14613 FOREST AVE 672.71 24 AC 48 POOR 251
14984 FOREST AVE 268.67 24 AC 52 POOR 331
14991 FOREST AVE 648.12 24 AC 24 SERIOUS 264
15001 FOREST AVE 653.48 24 AC 14 SERIOUS 311
15059 FOREST AVE 675.93 24 AC 39 VERY POOR 260
14079 FOUNTAIN AVE 443.03 26 AC 53 POOR 215
14188 FOUNTAIN AVE 498.03 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 211
14191 FOUNTAIN AVE 339.22 26 AC 73 SATISFACTORY 225
14192 FOUNTAIN AVE 436.73 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 271
23293 FOUNTAIN AVE 493.31 26 AC 63 FAIR 200
23312 FOUNTAIN AVE 518.54 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 256
195
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 14284 FREEL PEAK AVE 282.59 24 AC 35 VERY POOR 215
14285 FREEL PEAK AVE 283.13 24 AC 50 POOR 184
14286 FREEL PEAK AVE 279.44 24 AC 49 POOR 202
14287 FREEL PEAK AVE 273.06 24 AC 31 VERY POOR 265
14288 FREEL PEAK AVE 286.47 24 AC 18 SERIOUS 274
14292 FREEL PEAK AVE 304.84 24 AC 27 VERY POOR 207
14632 FREMONT AVE 288.68 28 AC 26 VERY POOR 222
23345 FREMONT AVE 158.47 28 AC 42 POOR 247
23353 FREMONT AVE 353.07 28 AC 39 VERY POOR 271
14426 FRESNO AVE 195.04 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 339
14427 FRESNO AVE 277.95 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 291
14557 FRESNO AVE 273.50 26 AC 61 FAIR 216
14565 FRESNO AVE 286.20 26 AC 69 FAIR 230
14566 FRESNO AVE 282.47 26 AC 48 POOR 244
14567 FRESNO AVE 275.57 26 AC 46 POOR 272
14568 FRESNO AVE 288.78 26 AC 47 POOR 286
14569 FRESNO AVE 238.73 26 AC 45 POOR 214
14596 FRESNO AVE 253.07 26 AC 93 GOOD 200
14601 FRESNO AVE 240.47 26 AC 21 SERIOUS 278
14602 FRESNO AVE 235.55 26 AC 46 POOR 273
14719 FRIANT CT 227.57 26 AC 69 FAIR 277
14715 FRIANT DR 747.81 26 AC 64 FAIR 221
14721 FRIANT DR 259.23 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 307
14722 FRIANT DR 262.21 26 AC 54 POOR 232
24478 FRIANT DR 463.09 26 AC 62 FAIR 276
14503 FRIDAY AVE 360.51 28 AC 42 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14533 FRIDAY AVE 86.12 34 AC 59 FAIR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 22759 FRIDAY AVE 351.21 26 AC 43 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14729 FRONTIER CT 574.19 30 AC 42 POOR 296
13866 G ST 463.77 26 AC 23 SERIOUS 435
13867 G ST 117.96 26 AC 76 SATISFACTORY -1 UNCOLLECTED PORTION BLOCKED BY VEHICLES; TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13931 GARDNER ST 447.78 26 AC 76 SATISFACTORY 217
13989 GARDNER ST 366.04 26 AC 56 FAIR 309
13991 GARDNER ST 265.78 26 AC 63 FAIR 345
13992 GARDNER ST 253.03 26 AC 35 VERY POOR 277
14246 GARDNER ST 1010.71 26 AC 51 POOR 278
14247 GARDNER ST 764.46 26 AC 95 GOOD 215
14249 GARDNER ST 677.88 26 AC 95 GOOD 178
14250 GARDNER ST 498.85 26 AC 95 GOOD 209
14378 GARDNER ST 346.33 26 AC 54 POOR 268
14380 GARDNER ST 362.73 26 AC 70 FAIR 278
22691 GARDNER ST 524.44 26 AC 26 VERY POOR 301
13537 GARMISH CT 289.11 30 AC 70 FAIR 273
22606 GARMISH CT 332.47 30 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 231
18955 GENEVIEVE CT 290.80 30 AC 37 VERY POOR 258
14800 GILMORE LAKE RD 1240.09 28 AC 32 VERY POOR 247
14823 GILMORE LAKE RD 242.28 28 AC 33 VERY POOR 291
14938 GLEN RD 800.68 26 AC 50 POOR 265
15028 GLEN RD 104.28 26 AC 61 FAIR 355
25075 GLEN RD 520.08 26 AC 53 POOR 284
14734 GLENWOOD WAY 369.19 26 AC 95 GOOD 154
14739 GLENWOOD WAY 448.54 26 AC 93 GOOD 205
14742 GLENWOOD WAY 285.44 26 AC 95 GOOD 127
14745 GLENWOOD WAY 179.08 26 AC 86 GOOD 163
14748 GLENWOOD WAY 287.25 26 AC 93 GOOD 185
14751 GLENWOOD WAY 288.43 26 AC 95 GOOD 125
14753 GLENWOOD WAY 255.46 26 AC 93 GOOD 159
14755 GLENWOOD WAY 547.21 26 AC 92 GOOD 171
14762 GLENWOOD WAY 325.53 26 AC 93 GOOD 173
14764 GLENWOOD WAY 322.69 26 AC 93 GOOD 169
14766 GLENWOOD WAY 283.17 26 AC 93 GOOD 163
14768 GLENWOOD WAY 725.15 26 AC 94 GOOD 165
14769 GLENWOOD WAY 254.34 26 AC 92 GOOD 135
14770 GLENWOOD WAY 330.05 26 AC 93 GOOD 162
14788 GLENWOOD WAY 642.12 26 AC 93 GOOD 164
14789 GLENWOOD WAY 686.39 26 AC 94 GOOD 154
14818 GLENWOOD WAY 718.54 26 AC 91 GOOD 162
14819 GLENWOOD WAY 1251.92 26 AC 91 GOOD 155
14897 GLENWOOD WAY 280.09 26 AC 92 GOOD 148
13912 GLORENE AVE 1610.72 26 AC 57 FAIR 256
13913 GLORENE AVE 673.82 26 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 257
13921 GLORENE AVE 456.19 26 AC 50 POOR 259
22694 GLORENE AVE 1083.29 26 AC 56 FAIR 199
22698 GLORENE AVE 1126.75 26 AC 47 POOR 263
22716 GLORENE AVE 233.90 26 AC 20 SERIOUS 345
18998 GOLD TIP AVE 830.75 24 AC 60 FAIR 241
14492 GREENWOOD RD 805.75 28 AC 47 POOR 268
19032 H ST 529.82 24 AC 25 SERIOUS 323
19003 HAPPY HOMESTEAD CEMETERY RD 325.66 45 AC 38 VERY POOR 171 14298 HARRISON AVE 396.64 10 AC 93 GOOD 247 ONE WAY
14300 HARRISON AVE 270.28 10 AC 95 GOOD 273 ONE WAY
14301 HARRISON AVE 248.74 28 AC 35 VERY POOR 330
14329 HARRISON AVE 287.91 10 AC 95 GOOD 222 ONE WAY
14331 HARRISON AVE 239.85 10 AC 94 GOOD -1 ONE WAY; TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14332 HARRISON AVE 247.84 10 AC 93 GOOD 164 ONE WAY
14333 HARRISON AVE 247.84 30 AC 41 POOR 289
196
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 13687 HARVARD AVE 847.57 24 AC 26 VERY POOR 305
13697 HAZEL DR 238.03 24 AC 37 VERY POOR 263
13699 HAZEL DR 1664.64 24 AC 36 VERY POOR 236
14813 HEATHER LAKE RD 660.13 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 319
14814 HEATHER LAKE RD 647.98 32 AC 35 VERY POOR 287
14690 HEAVENLY VALLEY RD 246.14 26 AC 27 VERY POOR 260
14691 HEAVENLY VALLEY RD 310.78 26 AC 29 VERY POOR 320
16571 HEAVENLY VILLAGE WAY 843.25 44 AC 54 POOR 232
13764 HELEN AVE 129.94 30 AC 49 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13766 HELEN AVE 97.99 30 AC 40 VERY POOR 283
13768 HELEN AVE 361.35 30 AC 37 VERY POOR 278
13786 HELEN AVE 390.31 26 AC 52 POOR 258
22659 HELEN AVE 487.23 24 AC 62 FAIR 168
22661 HELEN AVE 471.74 26 AC 56 FAIR 295
22663 HELEN AVE 683.50 26 AC 61 FAIR 211
14712 HERBERT AVE 186.76 28 AC 50 POOR 263
14782 HERBERT AVE 323.24 28 AC 29 VERY POOR 309
14783 HERBERT AVE 328.84 28 AC 38 VERY POOR 330
14785 HERBERT AVE 332.27 28 AC 55 POOR 240
14792 HERBERT AVE 186.31 28 AC 58 FAIR 252
14810 HERBERT AVE 523.77 28 AC 33 VERY POOR 287
14811 HERBERT AVE 854.86 28 AC 62 FAIR 275
14829 HERBERT AVE 795.05 28 AC 35 VERY POOR 275
14844 HERBERT AVE 259.26 28 AC 55 POOR 240
14845 HERBERT AVE 242.00 28 AC 76 SATISFACTORY 195
14849 HERBERT AVE 260.39 28 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 169
14851 HERBERT AVE 416.12 28 AC 65 FAIR 173
14852 HERBERT AVE 159.19 28 AC 49 POOR 254
14881 HERBERT AVE 176.69 28 AC 43 POOR 244
22754 HILL RD 152.95 28 AC 49 POOR 298
22755 HILL RD 271.30 24 AC 44 POOR 296
14787 HOBART RD 1366.65 30 AC 24 SERIOUS 292
22628 IDAHO AVE 996.83 26 AC 57 FAIR 249
22629 IDAHO AVE 303.87 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 288
13872 INDUSTRIAL AVE 1280.39 32 AC 40 VERY POOR 243
13985 INDUSTRIAL AVE 216.72 32 AC 44 POOR 268
13985 INDUSTRIAL AVE 37.72 32 AC 42 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 22718 INDUSTRIAL AVE 97.96 32 AC 44 POOR 257
18950 INVERNESS DR 1604.24 28 AC 33 VERY POOR 314
14767 JACKSON CT 94.24 28 AC 24 SERIOUS -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13658 JAMES AVE 821.33 28 AC 49 POOR 247
13672 JAMES AVE 1067.51 24 AC 51 POOR 233
13673 JAMES AVE 662.33 24 AC 63 FAIR 241
13674 JAMES AVE 606.14 24 AC 45 POOR 256
13675 JAMES AVE 665.31 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 253
13681 JAMES AVE 846.68 22 AC 35 VERY POOR 278
13804 JAMES AVE 919.78 22 AC 20 SERIOUS 272
13805 JAMES AVE 753.05 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 260
22653 JAMES AVE 1317.16 28 AC 42 POOR 217
23272 JAMES AVE 1087.26 28 AC 48 POOR 211
14773 JANET DR 1366.56 26 AC 62 FAIR 219
14778 JANET DR 227.27 26 AC 52 POOR 271
14891 JANET DR 135.13 26 AC 51 POOR 209
13796 JEAN AVE 564.49 28 AC 59 FAIR 229
13798 JEAN AVE 629.82 28 AC 39 VERY POOR 271
13640 JEFFERY ST 1585.12 28 AC 51 POOR 264
14684 JOBS PEAK DR 277.23 28 AC 58 FAIR 273
14687 JOBS PEAK DR 244.38 28 AC 38 VERY POOR 258
23351 JOBS PEAK DR 406.98 28 AC 43 POOR 270
14638 JOHNSON BLVD 623.77 36 AC 46 POOR 179
14646 JOHNSON BLVD 1011.86 36 AC 45 POOR 202
14676 JOHNSON BLVD 921.41 36 AC 55 POOR 172
14677 JOHNSON BLVD 975.08 36 AC 55 POOR 183
14838 JOHNSON BLVD 357.37 46 AC 41 POOR 241
14839 JOHNSON BLVD 387.18 36 AC 41 POOR 216
23352 JOHNSON BLVD 983.62 36 AC 20 SERIOUS 182
13874 JULIE LN 232.45 32 AC 47 POOR 242
13904 JULIE LN 1159.42 32 AC 52 POOR 229
13905 JULIE LN 1266.13 32 AC 46 POOR 245
13919 JULIE LN 153.60 26 AC 95 GOOD 236
13979 JULIE LN 851.19 40 AC 95 GOOD 146
13980 JULIE LN 756.06 32 AC 42 POOR 258
14377 JULIE LN 124.68 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 382
14383 JULIE LN 810.62 26 AC 41 POOR 267
14385 JULIE LN 831.84 26 AC 93 GOOD 204
22380 JULIE LN 1346.47 26 AC 60 FAIR 223
22727 JULIE LN 66.60 26 AC 58 FAIR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 15084 JUNE WAY 284.07 24 AC 26 VERY POOR 229
15086 JUNE WAY 283.17 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 233
22812 JUNE WAY 1156.42 24 AC 60 FAIR 249
14656 JUNIPER AVE 225.16 26 AC 45 POOR 290
14657 JUNIPER AVE 315.91 26 AC 44 POOR 271
23347 JUNIPER AVE 184.18 26 AC 19 SERIOUS 331
23349 JUNIPER AVE 315.84 26 AC 24 SERIOUS 301
14966 KELLER RD 145.79 32 AC 70 FAIR 185
15038 KELLER RD 292.34 32 AC 71 SATISFACTORY 190
197
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 15074 KELLER RD 143.90 32 AC 87 GOOD 228
15081 KELLER RD 206.31 36 AC 35 VERY POOR 217
15091 KELLER RD 621.85 28 AC 56 FAIR 253
15097 KELLER RD 838.95 36 AC 37 VERY POOR 232
15098 KELLER RD 2830.89 32 AC 34 VERY POOR 315
15224 KELLER RD 177.35 32 AC 91 GOOD 203
22813 KELLER RD 275.80 32 AC 95 GOOD 188
22814 KELLER RD 569.16 32 AC 91 GOOD 223
23365 KELLER RD 2282.01 32 AC 89 GOOD 176
19007 KNOLL LN 805.72 26 AC 42 POOR 311
14144 KNOX AVE 450.61 26 AC 58 FAIR 202
14145 KNOX AVE 501.99 26 AC 73 SATISFACTORY 195
14146 KNOX AVE 508.49 26 AC 71 SATISFACTORY 215
14147 KNOX AVE 441.40 26 AC 58 FAIR 202
14148 KNOX AVE 485.30 26 AC 65 FAIR 204
14149 KNOX AVE 545.92 26 AC 60 FAIR 238
14150 KNOX AVE 387.75 26 AC 45 POOR 241
13543 KOKANEE WAY 470.13 30 AC 78 SATISFACTORY 233
13545 KOKANEE WAY 623.53 30 AC 70 FAIR 263
13546 KOKANEE WAY 216.13 30 AC 76 SATISFACTORY 282
14181 KUBEL AVE 436.56 26 AC 63 FAIR 239
14182 KUBEL AVE 511.54 26 AC 50 POOR 244
14183 KUBEL AVE 509.45 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 245
14184 KUBEL AVE 438.43 26 AC 48 POOR 238
14185 KUBEL AVE 488.13 26 AC 53 POOR 238
14186 KUBEL AVE 427.16 26 AC 49 POOR 283
19031 KYBURZ AVE 2671.53 22 AC 39 VERY POOR 267
14505 LA SALLE ST 394.68 26 AC 47 POOR 227
14531 LA SALLE ST 382.79 38 AC 27 VERY POOR 343
18945 LAKE PKY 1042.90 40 AC 47 POOR 225
13974 LAKE TAHOE BLVD 670.69 68 AC 90 GOOD 180
13975 LAKE TAHOE BLVD 469.75 62 AC 93 GOOD 74
13978 LAKE TAHOE BLVD 840.50 52 AC 94 GOOD 92
13981 LAKE TAHOE BLVD 1392.08 52 AC 95 GOOD 83
99999 LAKE TAHOE BLVD 176.87 52 AC 68 FAIR 222
14496 LAKESHORE BLVD 982.40 24 AC 59 FAIR 239
14497 LAKESHORE BLVD 205.44 15 AC 24 SERIOUS -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14304 LAKEVIEW AVE 307.69 32 AC 63 FAIR 202
14305 LAKEVIEW AVE 12.46 32 AC 78 SATISFACTORY 227
14311 LAKEVIEW AVE 429.53 32 AC 70 FAIR 166
14313 LAKEVIEW AVE 458.25 32 AC 69 FAIR 190
14341 LAKEVIEW AVE 440.96 32 AC 95 GOOD 141
14361 LAKEVIEW AVE 437.48 32 AC 70 FAIR 194
14362 LAKEVIEW AVE 442.53 32 AC 77 SATISFACTORY 174
14388 LAKEVIEW AVE 347.56 34 AC 90 GOOD 215
14512 LAKEVIEW AVE 9.72 32 AC 95 GOOD 383
14539 LAKEVIEW AVE 446.13 32 AC 95 GOOD 123
14540 LAKEVIEW AVE 458.56 32 AC 95 GOOD 151
19011 LAKEWOOD CIR 832.61 20 AC 50 POOR 236
13735 LAPHAM DR 1034.70 24 AC 37 VERY POOR 294
14615 LARCH AVE 672.57 22 AC 38 VERY POOR 348
14948 LARCH AVE 267.89 26 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 246
14951 LARCH AVE 267.43 26 AC 54 POOR 228
15004 LARCH AVE 655.54 22 AC 31 VERY POOR 272
15034 LARCH AVE 263.58 26 AC 49 POOR 284
15036 LARCH AVE 525.86 26 AC 53 POOR 255
15062 LARCH AVE 671.60 22 AC 41 POOR 297
23358 LARCH AVE 588.25 26 AC 61 FAIR 286
23359 LARCH AVE 248.61 26 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 212
13615 LASSEN DR 1028.97 30 AC 32 VERY POOR 226
13619 LASSEN DR 390.67 30 AC 45 POOR 257
15089 LEDGE CT 458.60 26 AC 26 VERY POOR 326
19004 LESTER ST 710.37 24 AC 36 VERY POOR 243
14756 LEWIS ST 238.20 24 AC 31 VERY POOR 229
13542 LIDO DR 505.89 30 AC 79 SATISFACTORY 268
13621 LIGHTHOUSE SHORES DR 54.46 42 AC 80 SATISFACTORY -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14309 LILY AVE 371.38 24 AC 42 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13750 LINDA AVE 339.64 24 AC 27 VERY POOR 309
22649 LINDA AVE 217.94 24 AC 37 VERY POOR 295
22651 LINDA AVE 183.91 24 AC 38 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 19025 LINDBERG AVE 1126.57 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 305
13948 LISA MALOFF WAY 2084.99 28 AC 86 GOOD 221 ONE WAY 14623 LLOYD AVE 495.19 28 AC 95 GOOD 397 UNCOLLECTED PORTION DOES NOT EXIST 14067 LODI AVE 235.46 26 AC 46 POOR 251
14068 LODI AVE 241.88 26 AC 54 POOR 245
14072 LODI AVE 233.55 26 AC 63 FAIR 160
14074 LODI AVE 244.26 26 AC 59 FAIR 216
14086 LODI AVE 112.52 26 AC 61 FAIR 336
14087 LODI AVE 134.26 26 AC 52 POOR 252
14198 LODI AVE 223.61 26 AC 75 SATISFACTORY 231
14229 LODI AVE 232.66 26 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 211
14255 LODI AVE 207.33 26 AC 35 VERY POOR 336
14256 LODI AVE 500.08 26 AC 60 FAIR 222
17235 LODI AVE 123.74 26 AC 50 POOR 227
23289 LODI AVE 293.47 26 AC 58 FAIR 215
23291 LODI AVE 240.18 26 AC 50 POOR 200
198
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 23292 LODI AVE 235.29 26 AC 50 POOR 226
23294 LODI AVE 243.42 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 262
23321 LODI AVE 244.04 26 AC 76 SATISFACTORY 232
23325 LODI AVE 239.97 26 AC 55 POOR 286
14955 LOGROAD PL 210.92 22 AC 42 POOR 312
14660 LONG VALLEY AVE 283.66 26 AC 42 POOR 281
14664 LONG VALLEY AVE 283.96 26 AC 42 POOR 273
14666 LONG VALLEY AVE 212.19 26 AC 65 FAIR 273
14671 LONG VALLEY AVE 209.52 26 AC 44 POOR 331
14673 LONG VALLEY AVE 49.68 26 AC 51 POOR 303
14674 LONG VALLEY AVE 31.99 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 272
14315 LOS ANGELES AVE 770.01 26 AC 94 GOOD 169
14399 LOS ANGELES AVE 61.00 26 AC 90 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14558 LOS ANGELES AVE 447.55 26 AC 91 GOOD 210
14580 LOS ANGELES AVE 447.51 26 AC 93 GOOD 191
22725 LOS ANGELES AVE 361.98 26 AC 94 GOOD 185
22726 LOS ANGELES AVE 433.34 26 AC 87 GOOD 199
22764 LOS ANGELES AVE 446.11 26 AC 95 GOOD 169
22765 LOS ANGELES AVE 449.47 26 AC 95 GOOD 157
22766 LOS ANGELES AVE 456.18 26 AC 92 GOOD 180
14945 LOST SHEEP LN 491.00 28 AC 33 VERY POOR 338
18958 LUCERNE WAY 831.16 30 AC 31 VERY POOR 237
14980 LUCINDA CT 457.15 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 293
22631 LUKINS WAY 222.89 26 AC 48 POOR 285
22674 LUKINS WAY 1947.21 26 AC 67 FAIR 217
18999 LYONS AVE 1077.40 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 226
14004 MACINAW RD 36.94 26 AC 90 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14005 MACINAW RD 195.67 26 AC 42 POOR 208
14007 MACINAW RD 263.66 26 AC 48 POOR 196
14011 MACINAW RD 490.71 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 248
14913 MACKEDIE WAY 1025.45 26 AC 50 POOR 319
14466 MANZANITA AVE 592.44 28 AC 60 FAIR 213
14471 MANZANITA AVE 169.64 26 AC 44 POOR 284
14473 MANZANITA AVE 409.43 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 420
22741 MANZANITA AVE 791.98 26 AC 64 FAIR 198
22742 MANZANITA AVE 249.70 26 AC 61 FAIR 235
18985 MAPLE AVE 249.93 28 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 251
13539 MARCONI WAY 351.98 30 AC 77 SATISFACTORY 228
22608 MARCONI WAY 401.32 30 AC 75 SATISFACTORY 246
22609 MARCONI WAY 480.39 30 AC 75 SATISFACTORY 246
13869 MARGARET AVE 133.65 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 352
13899 MARGARET AVE 238.37 26 AC 51 POOR 356
13900 MARGARET AVE 1157.52 26 AC 44 POOR 267
13901 MARGARET AVE 1296.12 26 AC 46 POOR 253
19014 MARJORIE ST 957.94 24 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 171
15041 MARKOFER WAY 686.25 26 AC 47 POOR 265
14678 MARLETTE CIR 134.50 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 197
14679 MARLETTE CIR 174.01 26 AC 57 FAIR 208
14681 MARLETTE CIR 412.87 26 AC 57 FAIR 229
14682 MARLETTE CIR 149.19 26 AC 27 VERY POOR 299
14683 MARLETTE CIR 553.01 26 AC 52 POOR 212
14688 MARLETTE CIR 631.08 26 AC 56 FAIR 216
14689 MARLETTE CIR 229.99 26 AC 67 FAIR 212
14104 MARTIN AVE 245.07 28 AC 92 GOOD 220
14115 MARTIN AVE 234.04 28 AC 92 GOOD 177
14127 MARTIN AVE 242.87 28 AC 94 GOOD 170
14139 MARTIN AVE 233.90 28 AC 92 GOOD 200
14153 MARTIN AVE 246.44 28 AC 92 GOOD 267
14165 MARTIN AVE 238.32 28 AC 89 GOOD 162
14176 MARTIN AVE 237.51 28 AC 82 SATISFACTORY 213
14193 MARTIN AVE 218.32 28 AC 85 SATISFACTORY 213
14206 MARTIN AVE 236.68 28 AC 90 GOOD 198
14219 MARTIN AVE 233.35 28 AC 87 GOOD 227
14220 MARTIN AVE 246.89 28 AC 88 GOOD 198
17230 MARTIN AVE 128.22 28 AC 89 GOOD 292
14720 MATHESON DR 131.70 26 AC 59 FAIR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14726 MATHESON DR 1248.87 26 AC 70 FAIR 254
23354 MATHESON DR 130.35 26 AC 76 SATISFACTORY 215
23355 MATHESON DR 263.34 26 AC 60 FAIR 278
22751 MEADOW RD 197.78 18 AC 46 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13803 MELBA DR 1130.72 24 AC 26 VERY POOR 218
22670 MELBA DR 1164.99 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 282
22671 MELBA DR 990.61 24 AC 40 VERY POOR 252
14345 MERCED AVE 442.35 24 AC 56 FAIR 203
14354 MERCED AVE 445.35 24 AC 70 FAIR 217
14370 MERCED AVE 446.08 24 AC 59 FAIR 208
14597 MERCED AVE 443.56 24 AC 64 FAIR 245
14598 MERCED AVE 444.47 24 AC 45 POOR 253
23336 MERCED AVE 436.22 24 AC 53 POOR 218
23338 MERCED AVE 449.80 24 AC 62 FAIR 229
13595 MICHAEL DR 235.25 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 279
13597 MICHAEL DR 195.23 26 AC 52 POOR 224
13598 MICHAEL DR 271.25 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 240
13599 MICHAEL DR 225.49 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 244
13600 MICHAEL DR 241.24 26 AC 46 POOR 220
13601 MICHAEL DR 272.47 26 AC 48 POOR 242
199
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 13606 MICHAEL DR 282.10 26 AC 67 FAIR 265
13608 MICHAEL DR 242.78 26 AC 58 FAIR 211
13609 MICHAEL DR 249.47 26 AC 70 FAIR 194
13626 MICHAEL DR 1.17 26 AC 100 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13627 MICHAEL DR 425.05 26 AC 53 POOR 250
14927 MIDWAY RD 232.90 26 AC 42 POOR 329
15017 MIDWAY RD 210.23 26 AC 35 VERY POOR 321
15026 MIDWAY RD 177.90 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 347
14008 MILLER ST 144.01 24 AC 20 SERIOUS 273
14314 MODESTO AVE 447.04 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 268
14318 MODESTO AVE 274.77 30 AC 96 GOOD 200
14325 MODESTO AVE 440.12 24 AC 49 POOR 240
14326 MODESTO AVE 451.29 24 AC 42 POOR 250
14398 MODESTO AVE 62.51 30 AC 88 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14413 MODESTO AVE 419.17 24 AC 46 POOR 341
14550 MODESTO AVE 451.34 24 AC 37 VERY POOR 274
14562 MODESTO AVE 448.19 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 246
14574 MODESTO AVE 445.95 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 288
14575 MODESTO AVE 440.63 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 260
14633 MONO LN 659.45 26 AC 22 SERIOUS 224
13638 MONTANA AVE 893.12 26 AC 52 POOR 241
13515 MONTEREY DR 34.38 28 AC 59 FAIR 348
22597 MONTEREY DR 943.38 28 AC 36 VERY POOR 323
22598 MONTEREY DR 169.42 28 AC 37 VERY POOR 260
13605 MONTEZUMA DR 459.46 34 AC 43 POOR 277
14930 MONTREAL RD 305.75 26 AC 65 FAIR 177
15072 MONTREAL RD 238.34 26 AC 65 FAIR 213
15219 MONTREAL RD 241.48 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 231
22792 MONTREAL RD 939.19 36 AC 44 POOR 203
18997 MONUMENT DR 391.03 26 AC 27 VERY POOR 287
18956 MORRO DR 1084.37 28 AC 24 SERIOUS 295
15024 MOSS RD 582.74 26 AC 66 FAIR 154
22794 MOSS RD 441.24 28 AC 68 FAIR 163
14685 MT ROSE RD 648.26 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 255
14723 MURIETTA DR 447.46 36 AC 50 POOR 276
14727 MURIETTA DR 267.17 36 AC 73 SATISFACTORY 278
14837 MURIETTA DR 169.19 36 AC 60 FAIR 199
14730 NEEDLE PEAK RD 284.08 26 AC 41 POOR 315
14834 NEEDLE PEAK RD 459.81 26 AC 41 POOR 317
14875 NEEDLE PEAK RD 584.10 26 AC 45 POOR 292
14956 NEEDLE PEAK RD 258.45 30 AC 26 VERY POOR 327
14958 NEEDLE PEAK RD 301.06 30 AC 39 VERY POOR 343
15054 NEEDLE PEAK RD 47.58 32 AC 86 GOOD 226
22797 NEEDLE PEAK RD 807.05 30 AC 58 FAIR 284
22810 NEEDLE PEAK RD 987.89 32 AC 84 SATISFACTORY 110
23357 NEEDLE PEAK RD 362.96 32 AC 86 GOOD 169
14416 NEVADA AVE 241.55 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 209
14432 NEVADA AVE 273.44 26 AC 47 POOR 248
14433 NEVADA AVE 283.00 26 AC 54 POOR 258
14434 NEVADA AVE 285.97 26 AC 41 POOR 186
14436 NEVADA AVE 271.44 26 AC 44 POOR 219
14519 NEVADA AVE 98.32 26 AC 59 FAIR 205
14543 NEVADA AVE 238.56 26 AC 42 POOR 204
14576 NEVADA AVE 283.02 26 AC 43 POOR 212
14577 NEVADA AVE 278.26 26 AC 47 POOR 284
14578 NEVADA AVE 287.25 26 AC 42 POOR 239
14579 NEVADA AVE 274.64 26 AC 51 POOR 295
23339 NEVADA AVE 245.49 26 AC 94 GOOD 189
23340 NEVADA AVE 248.72 26 AC 44 POOR 244
14905 NORMA ST 572.09 26 AC 61 FAIR 261
14057 O MALLEY DR 334.82 24 AC 27 VERY POOR 319
14060 O MALLEY DR 632.84 24 AC 49 POOR 243
14063 O MALLEY DR 386.23 24 AC 39 VERY POOR 320
14065 O MALLEY DR 339.33 24 AC 46 POOR 232
14069 O MALLEY DR 413.55 26 AC 52 POOR 319
14070 O MALLEY DR 299.95 26 AC 66 FAIR 273
14073 O MALLEY DR 309.58 26 AC 54 POOR 209
14075 O MALLEY DR 328.27 26 AC 51 POOR 225
14076 O MALLEY DR 221.96 26 AC 56 FAIR 240
14077 O MALLEY DR 278.47 26 AC 56 FAIR 230
14241 O MALLEY DR 383.05 26 AC 54 POOR 277
14280 O MALLEY DR 268.12 26 AC 53 POOR 219
14667 OAK AVE 469.49 26 AC 48 POOR 270
14669 OAK AVE 492.38 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 307
14670 OAK AVE 94.97 26 AC 67 FAIR 241
14295 OAKLAND AVE 269.02 26 AC 43 POOR 356
14327 OAKLAND AVE 274.55 26 AC 44 POOR 227
14347 OAKLAND AVE 241.47 26 AC 63 FAIR 287
14349 OAKLAND AVE 240.71 26 AC 62 FAIR 249
14350 OAKLAND AVE 285.05 26 AC 68 FAIR 185
14520 OAKLAND AVE 862.90 26 AC 35 VERY POOR 290
14522 OAKLAND AVE 292.72 26 AC 46 POOR 205
14523 OAKLAND AVE 283.30 26 AC 41 POOR 268
14524 OAKLAND AVE 281.05 26 AC 51 POOR 246
23333 OAKLAND AVE 281.76 26 AC 50 POOR 220
23334 OAKLAND AVE 248.95 26 AC 95 GOOD 217
200
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 23335 OAKLAND AVE 235.32 26 AC 60 FAIR 195
23337 OAKLAND AVE 270.22 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 266
19021 OREGON AVE 1348.45 26 AC 66 FAIR 201
14059 OSBORNE AVE 92.74 26 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 387
14170 OSBORNE AVE 445.31 26 AC 57 FAIR 205
14171 OSBORNE AVE 504.64 26 AC 51 POOR 241
14172 OSBORNE AVE 508.92 26 AC 59 FAIR 229
14173 OSBORNE AVE 442.13 26 AC 70 FAIR 204
14174 OSBORNE AVE 485.76 26 AC 60 FAIR 201
14175 OSBORNE AVE 536.54 26 AC 69 FAIR 255
14607 OSGOOD AVE 141.07 28 AC 55 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14608 OSGOOD AVE 137.29 28 AC 47 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14989 OSGOOD AVE 638.64 32 AC 33 VERY POOR 325
24494 OSGOOD AVE 645.98 24 AC 32 VERY POOR 273
14977 OVERLOOK CT 374.67 30 AC 43 POOR 296
14092 PALMIRA AVE 509.45 26 AC 48 POOR 234
14093 PALMIRA AVE 440.42 26 AC 54 POOR 251
14094 PALMIRA AVE 402.22 24 AC 55 POOR 269
23295 PALMIRA AVE 441.44 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 302
23296 PALMIRA AVE 510.88 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 320
14428 PALOMA AVE 346.20 22 AC 25 SERIOUS 320
14584 PALOMA AVE 450.05 22 AC 38 VERY POOR 301
14585 PALOMA AVE 358.82 22 AC 43 POOR 235
19027 PANTHER LN 777.06 24 AC 95 GOOD 229
19028 PANTHER LN 755.13 24 AC 94 GOOD 206
14610 PARADISE AVE 396.29 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 288
14611 PARADISE AVE 257.29 24 AC 36 VERY POOR 310
14983 PARADISE AVE 337.51 26 AC 31 VERY POOR 282
22802 PARADISE AVE 648.46 26 AC 58 FAIR 237
22803 PARADISE AVE 650.03 26 AC 43 POOR 297
22811 PARADISE AVE 677.88 26 AC 46 POOR 333 ONE WAY
14468 PARK AVE 128.32 62 AC 49 POOR 276
14472 PARK AVE 14.70 50 AC 11 SERIOUS 439
14483 PARK AVE 57.79 28 AC 39 VERY POOR 267
14486 PARK AVE 99.30 28 AC 42 POOR 232
14487 PARK AVE 144.49 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 245
14493 PARK AVE 141.37 48 AC 44 POOR 220
14498 PARK AVE 117.10 44 AC 46 POOR 292
16572 PARK AVE 226.14 44 AC 54 POOR 231
22743 PARK AVE 269.51 50 AC 45 POOR 312
22744 PARK AVE 273.92 42 AC 48 POOR 234
22746 PARK AVE 202.55 38 AC 45 POOR 263
22747 PARK AVE 178.70 52 AC 50 POOR 276
22749 PARK AVE 208.06 28 AC 30 VERY POOR 237
22762 PARK AVE 358.92 58 AC 30 VERY POOR 272
14323 PASADENA AVE 270.15 30 AC 95 GOOD 153
14355 PASADENA AVE 289.04 30 AC 95 GOOD 187
14356 PASADENA AVE 238.99 30 AC 93 GOOD 185
14357 PASADENA AVE 244.43 30 AC 95 GOOD 247
14358 PASADENA AVE 241.79 30 AC 95 GOOD 157
14359 PASADENA AVE 245.77 30 AC 94 GOOD 193
14360 PASADENA AVE 121.95 30 AC 86 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 19024 PATRICIA CIR 206.88 26 AC 30 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13701 PATRICIA LN 1632.08 22 AC 42 POOR 299
13729 PATRICIA LN 171.61 26 AC 42 POOR 282
13731 PATRICIA LN 536.34 22 AC 48 POOR 278
13732 PATRICIA LN 965.72 22 AC 40 VERY POOR 251
14804 PENINSULA RD 654.59 32 AC 54 POOR 280
14928 PENTAGON RD 956.84 26 AC 57 FAIR 245
13693 PETER AVE 450.33 24 AC 28 VERY POOR 298
14649 PICKETT AVE 129.83 26 AC 23 SERIOUS -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14652 PICKETT AVE 242.68 26 AC 20 SERIOUS 309
14668 PICKETT AVE 247.07 26 AC 62 FAIR 229
14672 PICKETT AVE 252.28 26 AC 57 FAIR 244
14675 PICKETT AVE 629.51 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 273
14480 PINE BLVD 1442.85 36 AC 40 VERY POOR 245
18365 PINE BLVD 153.92 38 AC 56 FAIR 303
22470 PINE BLVD 143.22 42 AC 46 POOR 230
22745 PINE BLVD 370.38 24 AC 44 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14985 PINE GROVE AVE 235.83 24 AC 45 POOR 229
14986 PINE GROVE AVE 245.62 24 AC 60 FAIR 267
14987 PINE GROVE AVE 250.26 24 AC 51 POOR 259
14961 PINE HILL RD 601.98 30 AC 95 GOOD 191
14962 PINE HILL RD 312.34 30 AC 87 GOOD 213
14963 PINE HILL RD 885.11 30 AC 95 GOOD 189
14752 PINECREST AVE 650.92 26 AC 61 FAIR 201
14026 PINEWOOD DR 597.26 20 AC 53 POOR 248
14205 PINTER AVE 339.30 26 AC 66 FAIR 178
23314 PINTER AVE 196.74 26 AC 54 POOR 307
23315 PINTER AVE 492.52 26 AC 44 POOR 214
23316 PINTER AVE 439.73 26 AC 53 POOR 221
23317 PINTER AVE 503.57 26 AC 60 FAIR 182
23318 PINTER AVE 520.47 26 AC 48 POOR 211
23319 PINTER AVE 437.72 26 AC 43 POOR 277
14866 PIONEER TRL 671.62 28 AC 79 SATISFACTORY 180
14868 PIONEER TRL 301.25 28 AC 95 GOOD 179
201
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 14870 PIONEER TRL 157.89 28 AC 95 GOOD 177
14872 PIONEER TRL 329.32 28 AC 95 GOOD 107
14874 PIONEER TRL 711.51 28 AC 94 GOOD 119
14876 PIONEER TRL 260.56 28 AC 95 GOOD 157
14878 PIONEER TRL 746.39 28 AC 95 GOOD 109
14880 PIONEER TRL 75.97 28 AC 95 GOOD 384
14882 PIONEER TRL 420.20 28 AC 95 GOOD 74
14884 PIONEER TRL 355.20 28 AC 95 GOOD 87
14886 PIONEER TRL 173.50 28 AC 95 GOOD 122
14888 PIONEER TRL 297.27 28 AC 95 GOOD 107
14890 PIONEER TRL 110.04 28 AC 93 GOOD 174
14892 PIONEER TRL 171.94 28 AC 95 GOOD 147
14895 PIONEER TRL 304.48 28 AC 95 GOOD 154
14896 PIONEER TRL 151.65 42 AC 95 GOOD 185
14898 PIONEER TRL 140.65 42 AC 95 GOOD 156
14900 PIONEER TRL 291.03 28 AC 94 GOOD 183
14902 PIONEER TRL 299.01 28 AC 95 GOOD 123
14904 PIONEER TRL 291.91 28 AC 95 GOOD 123
14906 PIONEER TRL 1570.73 26 AC 95 GOOD 92
14907 PIONEER TRL 288.33 28 AC 95 GOOD 106
15021 PIONEER TRL 219.83 46 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 212
15023 PIONEER TRL 247.89 36 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 164
15025 PIONEER TRL 546.56 36 AC 73 SATISFACTORY 140
15027 PIONEER TRL 198.98 38 AC 63 FAIR 205
15029 PIONEER TRL 517.70 38 AC 55 POOR 207
15031 PIONEER TRL 591.29 36 AC 71 SATISFACTORY 176
15033 PIONEER TRL 194.89 42 AC 53 POOR 257
15035 PIONEER TRL 45.28 42 AC 43 POOR 259
15037 PIONEER TRL 217.87 38 AC 38 VERY POOR 277
15039 PIONEER TRL 395.06 38 AC 41 POOR 244
15042 PIONEER TRL 69.25 48 AC 30 VERY POOR -1 IRI DATA IS NOT STATISTICALLY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONDITION OF THE SEGMENT 15044 PIONEER TRL 79.93 48 AC 43 POOR 287
15048 PIONEER TRL 835.37 42 AC 47 POOR 235
17596 PIONEER TRL 1692.93 26 AC 95 GOOD 84
17880 PIONEER TRL 354.69 48 AC 38 VERY POOR 177
17881 PIONEER TRL 447.58 42 AC 34 VERY POOR 276
14429 PLACER AVE 92.29 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 411
14546 PLACER AVE 447.81 26 AC 44 POOR 317
14547 PLACER AVE 122.71 26 AC 27 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14771 PLUM ST 156.10 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 285
14772 PLUM ST 217.50 26 AC 25 SERIOUS 242
14774 PLUM ST 219.30 26 AC 24 SERIOUS 287
14047 PONDEROSA ST 234.47 28 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 279
14049 PONDEROSA ST 446.67 28 AC 85 SATISFACTORY 220
14050 PONDEROSA ST 726.23 28 AC 70 FAIR 204
14879 PONY EXPRESS WAY 416.59 24 AC 25 SERIOUS 347
14501 POPLAR ST 360.66 28 AC 49 POOR 280
14877 PRICE RD 561.70 30 AC 42 POOR 248
14924 PRIMROSE RD 240.08 26 AC 53 POOR 278
14926 PRIMROSE RD 235.60 26 AC 53 POOR 244
14931 PRIMROSE RD 245.17 26 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 209
14932 PRIMROSE RD 684.90 26 AC 29 VERY POOR 357
14933 PRIMROSE RD 122.16 26 AC 42 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13741 RAINBOW DR 1199.00 22 AC 30 VERY POOR 313
14903 RALPH DR 760.28 26 AC 41 POOR 221
14908 RALPH DR 867.23 26 AC 49 POOR 215
14759 RANCHO CIR 1157.93 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 264
14760 RANCHO CIR 210.61 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 209
14761 RANCHO WAY 880.60 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 255
22772 RANCHO WAY 521.15 26 AC 35 VERY POOR 284
14006 REAVES ST 146.65 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 235
14795 RED LAKE RD 1378.11 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 346
14910 REGINA RD 1140.49 28 AC 39 VERY POOR 299
23394 REGINA RD 1366.92 30 AC 41 POOR 225
14096 RENO AVE 235.68 26 AC 68 FAIR 227
14106 RENO AVE 241.17 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 254
14155 RENO AVE 232.45 26 AC 45 POOR 188
14167 RENO AVE 243.98 26 AC 23 SERIOUS 231
14195 RENO AVE 221.22 26 AC 58 FAIR 223
14208 RENO AVE 236.26 26 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 276
14223 RENO AVE 240.85 26 AC 55 POOR 237
14224 RENO AVE 240.08 26 AC 53 POOR 181
23297 RENO AVE 241.97 26 AC 49 POOR 227
23301 RENO AVE 241.48 26 AC 59 FAIR 272
23304 RENO AVE 242.10 26 AC 46 POOR 228
23311 RENO AVE 239.71 26 AC 43 POOR 205
23328 RENO AVE 210.42 26 AC 16 SERIOUS 345
14253 RIVER DR 236.89 24 AC 48 POOR 273
23290 RIVER DR 618.53 24 AC 52 POOR 188
14320 RIVERSIDE AVE 273.12 12 AC 95 GOOD 211 ONE WAY
14371 RIVERSIDE AVE 288.51 12 AC 95 GOOD 192 ONE WAY
14372 RIVERSIDE AVE 234.05 12 AC 95 GOOD 189 ONE WAY
14373 RIVERSIDE AVE 245.27 12 AC 95 GOOD 153 ONE WAY
14374 RIVERSIDE AVE 240.73 28 AC 47 POOR 300
14375 RIVERSIDE AVE 241.49 28 AC 33 VERY POOR 250
14803 ROCKWOOD RD 358.37 24 AC 68 FAIR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 202
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 14939 ROCKY POINT RD 46.59 26 AC 64 FAIR 414
14941 ROCKY POINT RD 127.89 26 AC 73 SATISFACTORY 266
22795 ROCKY POINT RD 358.05 26 AC 41 POOR 188
22796 ROCKY POINT RD 317.85 24 AC 53 POOR 263
23362 ROCKY POINT RD 893.58 26 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 261
23441 ROCKY POINT RD 144.12 26 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 283
23442 ROCKY POINT RD 423.21 26 AC 76 SATISFACTORY 266
25076 ROCKY POINT RD 1038.26 26 AC 53 POOR 297
13924 ROGER AVE 1208.62 26 AC 95 GOOD 184
22693 ROGER AVE 1067.39 26 AC 94 GOOD 194
22695 ROGER AVE 675.03 26 AC 95 GOOD 182
22696 ROGER AVE 1079.25 26 AC 95 GOOD 183
22699 ROGER AVE 454.42 26 AC 95 GOOD 167
14212 ROSE AVE 338.41 26 AC 41 POOR 305
14213 ROSE AVE 436.88 26 AC 61 FAIR 201
14214 ROSE AVE 514.38 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 263
14215 ROSE AVE 510.46 26 AC 61 FAIR 233
14216 ROSE AVE 437.53 26 AC 49 POOR 261
14217 ROSE AVE 491.73 26 AC 50 POOR 269
14218 ROSE AVE 305.91 26 AC 35 VERY POOR 267
13718 ROYAL AVE 282.18 30 AC 23 SERIOUS 227
24436 ROYAL AVE 754.93 26 AC 43 POOR 278
14003 RUBICON TRL 732.00 26 AC 88 GOOD 199
14013 RUBICON TRL 75.94 26 AC 85 SATISFACTORY -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14266 RUBICON TRL 296.72 32 AC 44 POOR 301
23275 RUBICON TRL 351.06 26 AC 86 GOOD 197
14970 RUBY LN 988.29 26 AC 50 POOR 243
14702 RUFUS ALLEN BLVD 1469.91 28 AC 36 VERY POOR 211
25709 RUFUS ALLEN BLVD 222.01 36 AC 30 VERY POOR 208
25710 RUFUS ALLEN BLVD 1063.17 36 AC 43 POOR 170
13754 RUTH AVE 993.27 26 AC 20 SERIOUS 263
13755 RUTH AVE 556.55 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 270
14310 SACRAMENTO AVE 1091.61 16 AC 52 POOR 259 ONE WAY
14312 SACRAMENTO AVE 41.45 16 AC 95 GOOD 271 ONE WAY
14317 SACRAMENTO AVE 275.16 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 264
14328 SACRAMENTO AVE 278.77 24 AC 45 POOR 249
14335 SACRAMENTO AVE 270.54 24 AC 53 POOR 233
14336 SACRAMENTO AVE 251.23 24 AC 51 POOR 209
14337 SACRAMENTO AVE 230.00 24 AC 20 SERIOUS 240
14338 SACRAMENTO AVE 254.00 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 251
14339 SACRAMENTO AVE 251.02 24 AC 92 GOOD 143
14340 SACRAMENTO AVE 118.32 16 AC 95 GOOD -1 ONE WAY; TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14545 SACRAMENTO AVE 533.20 24 AC 27 VERY POOR 317
14583 SACRAMENTO AVE 292.33 24 AC 30 VERY POOR 266
14586 SACRAMENTO AVE 280.86 24 AC 28 VERY POOR 364
14589 SACRAMENTO AVE 280.88 24 AC 28 VERY POOR 346
14592 SACRAMENTO AVE 270.16 24 AC 32 VERY POOR 264
14593 SACRAMENTO AVE 288.96 24 AC 36 VERY POOR 306
14832 SADDLE RD 483.65 28 AC 42 POOR 289
14883 SADDLE RD 471.49 24 AC 23 SERIOUS 326
15083 SADDLE RD 629.76 28 AC 36 VERY POOR 278
15088 SADDLE RD 460.34 28 AC 53 POOR 303
15090 SADDLE RD 269.56 28 AC 69 FAIR 306
15092 SADDLE RD 586.85 28 AC 68 FAIR 272
15094 SADDLE RD 1222.35 28 AC 48 POOR 271
15095 SADDLE RD 1535.74 28 AC 42 POOR 275
15099 SADDLE RD 364.98 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 261
15100 SADDLE RD 1576.62 28 AC 93 GOOD 212
15223 SADDLE RD 372.44 28 AC 26 VERY POOR 349
22783 SADDLE RD 1402.49 28 AC 29 VERY POOR 247
23356 SADDLE RD 315.77 28 AC 27 VERY POOR 332
14014 SAGEWOOD DR 468.41 32 AC 69 FAIR 297
14281 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 123.47 24 AC 40 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14297 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 383.27 24 AC 48 POOR 331
14316 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 444.22 26 AC 50 POOR 225
14319 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 315.96 26 AC 96 GOOD 151 ONE WAY 14321 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 442.16 26 AC 48 POOR 222
14322 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 450.00 26 AC 46 POOR 220
14396 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 53.29 26 AC 87 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14548 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 445.24 24 AC 40 VERY POOR 216
14559 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 448.25 24 AC 49 POOR 231
14572 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 451.36 24 AC 27 VERY POOR 271
14573 SAN FRANCISCO AVE 440.12 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 252
14342 SAN JOSE AVE 429.92 24 AC 47 POOR 206
14351 SAN JOSE AVE 448.83 24 AC 55 POOR 255
14363 SAN JOSE AVE 443.73 24 AC 42 POOR 267
14364 SAN JOSE AVE 407.16 24 AC 94 GOOD 202 ONE WAY
14390 SAN JOSE AVE 94.30 24 AC 86 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14542 SAN JOSE AVE 297.01 24 AC 50 POOR 287
14603 SAN JOSE AVE 441.00 24 AC 30 VERY POOR 261
14604 SAN JOSE AVE 452.28 24 AC 44 POOR 280
24437 SAN JOSE AVE 442.68 24 AC 38 VERY POOR 313
19026 SAND HARBOR RD 814.87 28 AC 95 GOOD 189
18994 SANDY WAY 658.22 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 211
13738 SECRET HARBOR DR 1100.20 22 AC 31 VERY POOR 293
13988 SHADY LN 490.25 28 AC 95 GOOD 243
203
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 13993 SHADY LN 349.58 28 AC 95 GOOD 232
14238 SHADY LN 254.53 28 AC 95 GOOD 218
14248 SHADY LN 264.07 28 AC 95 GOOD 257
13616 SHASTA CT 332.73 30 AC 26 VERY POOR 328
14940 SHEPHERDS DR 286.86 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 267
14942 SHEPHERDS DR 236.61 26 AC 59 FAIR 232
14943 SHEPHERDS DR 220.18 26 AC 48 POOR 281
14950 SHEPHERDS DR 259.79 26 AC 62 FAIR 240
15030 SHEPHERDS DR 243.87 26 AC 78 SATISFACTORY 240
15082 SHERMAN WAY 1057.02 28 AC 36 VERY POOR 292
14848 SHIRLEY AVE 766.30 28 AC 64 FAIR 289
19030 SHOP ST 1461.05 34 AC 37 VERY POOR 223
14097 SIERRA BLVD 237.58 38 AC 95 GOOD 251
14107 SIERRA BLVD 228.98 32 AC 95 GOOD 160
14179 SIERRA BLVD 239.22 50 AC 95 GOOD 212
14262 SIERRA BLVD 214.03 54 AC 95 GOOD 206
17233 SIERRA BLVD 122.83 50 AC 95 GOOD 166
23298 SIERRA BLVD 250.20 32 AC 95 GOOD 142
23302 SIERRA BLVD 238.84 32 AC 95 GOOD 184
23305 SIERRA BLVD 240.82 32 AC 95 GOOD 217
23309 SIERRA BLVD 240.60 32 AC 95 GOOD 179
23310 SIERRA BLVD 239.96 32 AC 95 GOOD 244
23313 SIERRA BLVD 225.21 50 AC 94 GOOD 216
23320 SIERRA BLVD 229.78 50 AC 95 GOOD 252
23323 SIERRA BLVD 243.88 50 AC 95 GOOD 160
23324 SIERRA BLVD 242.44 50 AC 95 GOOD 91
23286 SILVER DOLLAR AVE 303.86 28 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 262 23287 SILVER DOLLAR AVE 213.57 28 AC 59 FAIR 313
23327 SILVER DOLLAR AVE 514.78 28 AC 46 POOR 245
13772 SILVER TIP AVE 523.66 24 AC 29 VERY POOR 340
23282 SILVERWOOD CIR 692.26 20 AC 54 POOR 225
23284 SILVERWOOD CIR 611.49 20 AC 66 FAIR 220
19010 SILVERWOOD CT 170.94 20 AC 36 VERY POOR 275
14510 SKI RUN BLVD 379.81 50 AC 28 VERY POOR 310
14612 SKI RUN BLVD 247.99 30 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 212
14617 SKI RUN BLVD 248.09 62 AC 90 GOOD 100
14619 SKI RUN BLVD 252.63 62 AC 92 GOOD 136
14693 SKI RUN BLVD 418.49 60 AC 91 GOOD 146
14909 SKI RUN BLVD 649.65 68 AC 45 POOR 215
14911 SKI RUN BLVD 140.41 68 AC 38 VERY POOR 264
14912 SKI RUN BLVD 577.20 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 311
14914 SKI RUN BLVD 256.02 30 AC 67 FAIR 198
14916 SKI RUN BLVD 250.21 40 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 194
14918 SKI RUN BLVD 249.75 30 AC 66 FAIR 157
15051 SKI RUN BLVD 312.93 72 AC 34 VERY POOR 284
15052 SKI RUN BLVD 1222.13 68 AC 30 VERY POOR 255
15065 SKI RUN BLVD 243.67 56 AC 90 GOOD 196
15066 SKI RUN BLVD 43.41 44 AC 92 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 15068 SKI RUN BLVD 198.44 44 AC 70 FAIR 105
15069 SKI RUN BLVD 134.81 36 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 165
24490 SKI RUN BLVD 314.73 74 AC 75 SATISFACTORY 189
24491 SKI RUN BLVD 247.47 56 AC 92 GOOD 179
13654 SKY MEADOWS CT 1196.61 36 AC 49 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13530 SLALOM CT 272.10 30 AC 27 VERY POOR 307
22732 SONOMA AVE 477.09 24 AC 37 VERY POOR 306
22733 SONOMA AVE 442.39 24 AC 61 FAIR 269
23343 SONOMA AVE 423.74 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 281
23344 SONOMA AVE 449.58 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 283
15006 SONORA AVE 256.73 26 AC 28 VERY POOR 293
15008 SONORA AVE 246.42 26 AC 53 POOR 308
15009 SONORA AVE 249.75 26 AC 61 FAIR 280
15011 SONORA AVE 256.49 26 AC 42 POOR 260
15013 SONORA AVE 255.48 28 AC 52 POOR 305
15050 SONORA AVE 64.93 28 AC 33 VERY POOR 213
22805 SONORA AVE 246.84 26 AC 45 POOR 243
22806 SONORA AVE 246.21 26 AC 45 POOR 255
22808 SONORA AVE 243.69 28 AC 59 FAIR 264
24493 SONORA AVE 255.90 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 288
13774 SOUTH AVE 286.99 26 AC 57 FAIR 57
13793 SOUTH AVE 691.53 26 AC 95 GOOD 203
22667 SOUTH AVE 565.73 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 264
13737 SOUTH SHORE DR 219.29 28 AC 39 VERY POOR 352
13742 SOUTH SHORE DR 282.83 28 AC 36 VERY POOR 296
13744 SOUTH SHORE DR 1373.27 28 AC 46 POOR 226
22647 SOUTH SHORE DR 258.08 28 AC 28 VERY POOR 261
22648 SOUTH SHORE DR 309.71 28 AC 41 POOR 296
14017 SPRINGWOOD CT 120.48 30 AC 42 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14015 SPRINGWOOD DR 239.38 32 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 172
14018 SPRINGWOOD DR 144.50 36 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 239
14022 SPRINGWOOD DR 237.69 32 AC 82 SATISFACTORY 199
14028 SPRINGWOOD DR 156.32 36 AC 85 SATISFACTORY 306
14029 SPRINGWOOD DR 253.34 32 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 194
14030 SPRINGWOOD DR 238.69 32 AC 85 SATISFACTORY 183
14036 SPRINGWOOD DR 110.59 36 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 256
19013 SPRINGWOOD DR 221.90 36 AC 84 SATISFACTORY 174
23276 SPRINGWOOD DR 139.27 36 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 188
204
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 23277 SPRINGWOOD DR 991.39 32 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 199
23280 SPRINGWOOD DR 229.92 36 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 183
23281 SPRINGWOOD DR 210.10 36 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 179
23283 SPRINGWOOD DR 276.55 32 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 258
23285 SPRINGWOOD DR 200.61 36 AC 82 SATISFACTORY 163
14806 SPRUCE AVE 225.31 36 AC 95 GOOD 134
14815 SPRUCE AVE 185.15 36 AC 47 POOR 181
14816 SPRUCE AVE 326.81 36 AC 95 GOOD 119
14822 SPRUCE AVE 93.21 36 AC 92 GOOD 200
15047 SPRUCE AVE 337.67 26 AC 35 VERY POOR 299
15067 SPRUCE AVE 675.00 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 284
22771 SPRUCE AVE 803.27 30 AC 28 VERY POOR 318
22778 SPRUCE AVE 332.37 36 AC 95 GOOD 156
22779 SPRUCE AVE 521.69 36 AC 95 GOOD 106
22780 SPRUCE AVE 304.79 36 AC 95 GOOD 137
14437 STANFORD AVE 462.67 24 AC 31 VERY POOR 276
14438 STANFORD AVE 452.24 24 AC 34 VERY POOR 267
14439 STANFORD AVE 442.44 24 AC 36 VERY POOR 237
14594 STANFORD AVE 442.70 24 AC 31 VERY POOR 290
14595 STANFORD AVE 439.82 24 AC 31 VERY POOR 243
19002 STAR LAKE AVE 816.94 22 AC 61 FAIR 284
14464 STATELINE AVE 400.29 26 AC 43 POOR 233
14479 STATELINE AVE 349.36 38 AC 53 POOR 275
22740 STATELINE AVE 400.39 34 AC 33 VERY POOR 266
22748 STATELINE AVE 354.95 28 AC 64 FAIR 228
22756 STATELINE AVE 559.65 28 AC 60 FAIR 220
22763 STATELINE AVE 328.58 42 AC 48 POOR 240
15096 STERLING CT 229.69 26 AC 42 POOR 256
23360 STEVEN LN 760.66 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 322
23361 STEVEN LN 164.85 22 AC 48 POOR 350
14967 STEWART WAY 643.06 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 205
14098 STOCKTON AVE 242.33 26 AC 52 POOR 226
14108 STOCKTON AVE 234.78 26 AC 46 POOR 249
14157 STOCKTON AVE 248.19 26 AC 54 POOR 195
14169 STOCKTON AVE 231.44 26 AC 56 FAIR 191
14180 STOCKTON AVE 243.56 26 AC 48 POOR 197
14196 STOCKTON AVE 217.55 26 AC 55 POOR 263
14209 STOCKTON AVE 251.12 26 AC 48 POOR 240
14226 STOCKTON AVE 238.80 26 AC 60 FAIR 251
23299 STOCKTON AVE 245.58 26 AC 50 POOR 239
23303 STOCKTON AVE 239.31 26 AC 43 POOR 236
23306 STOCKTON AVE 235.86 26 AC 47 POOR 197
23322 STOCKTON AVE 234.29 26 AC 57 FAIR 237
23326 STOCKTON AVE 206.35 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 226
14494 SUNRISE LN 684.77 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 234
14045 SUNSET DR 544.86 26 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 244
14048 SUNSET DR 290.51 26 AC 75 SATISFACTORY 245
14801 SUSIE LAKE RD 1172.46 28 AC 33 VERY POOR 312
14001 SUSSEX AVE 245.65 26 AC 67 FAIR 323
14002 SUSSEX AVE 268.67 26 AC 26 VERY POOR 314
14009 SUSSEX AVE 269.15 26 AC 23 SERIOUS 286
14010 SUSSEX AVE 142.24 26 AC 52 POOR 262
13688 TAHOE ISLAND DR 313.14 24 AC 45 POOR 240
13710 TAHOE ISLAND DR 574.44 24 AC 94 GOOD 245
13712 TAHOE ISLAND DR 304.64 24 AC 95 GOOD 212
13714 TAHOE ISLAND DR 277.52 24 AC 95 GOOD 237
13724 TAHOE ISLAND DR 426.11 24 AC 93 GOOD 188
22637 TAHOE ISLAND DR 303.23 24 AC 47 POOR 261
22638 TAHOE ISLAND DR 373.51 24 AC 46 POOR 289
22639 TAHOE ISLAND DR 285.20 24 AC 39 VERY POOR 297
22643 TAHOE ISLAND DR 313.64 24 AC 95 GOOD 210
22644 TAHOE ISLAND DR 1962.02 24 AC 95 GOOD 184
22650 TAHOE ISLAND DR 460.13 22 AC 36 VERY POOR 324
13503 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 350.42 22 AC 100 GOOD 214
13506 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 21.53 22 AC 43 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13514 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 755.84 22 AC 75 SATISFACTORY -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13519 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 739.10 22 AC 36 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13520 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 759.76 22 AC 66 FAIR 251
13561 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 281.20 22 AC 25 SERIOUS 261
13562 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 263.44 22 AC 69 FAIR -1 IRI DATA IS NOT STATISTICALLY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONDITION OF THE SEGMENT 13622 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 358.04 22 AC 100 GOOD 214
13623 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 17.60 22 AC 100 GOOD 249
13624 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 17.79 22 AC 95 GOOD 226
13625 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 366.44 22 AC 100 GOOD -1 IRI DATA IS NOT STATISTICALLY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONDITION OF THE SEGMENT 13628 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 424.03 30 AC 100 GOOD 149
13631 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 320.62 30 AC 100 GOOD 137
13633 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 298.15 30 AC 100 GOOD 127
13635 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 338.48 30 AC 100 GOOD 126
13637 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 276.72 30 AC 100 GOOD 145
13639 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 38.20 30 AC 100 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13641 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 213.96 30 AC 100 GOOD 145
13644 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 275.74 30 AC 100 GOOD 112
13647 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 242.22 30 AC 100 GOOD 113
13649 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 255.77 30 AC 100 GOOD 169
13651 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 257.12 30 AC 100 GOOD 149
13653 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 239.54 30 AC 100 GOOD 164
205
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 13656 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 248.61 30 AC 100 GOOD 168
13657 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 283.43 44 AC 100 GOOD 177
13843 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 295.50 30 AC 100 GOOD 143
13844 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 29.86 30 AC 100 GOOD 269
24469 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 335.96 34 AC 100 GOOD -1 IRI DATA IS NOT STATISTICALLY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONDITION OF THE SEGMENT 24997 TAHOE KEYS BLVD 712.70 22 AC 49 POOR 250
13698 TAHOE VISTA DR 328.63 26 AC 70 FAIR 234
13717 TAHOE VISTA DR 54.39 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 373
13720 TAHOE VISTA DR 276.91 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 341
13722 TAHOE VISTA DR 710.38 26 AC 56 FAIR 238
13723 TAHOE VISTA DR 363.68 26 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 231
22641 TAHOE VISTA DR 1132.79 26 AC 58 FAIR 267
22642 TAHOE VISTA DR 284.71 26 AC 47 POOR 350
14629 TAKELA DR 290.99 26 AC 48 POOR 252
14630 TAKELA DR 166.14 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 229
14706 TAKELA DR 299.16 26 AC 21 SERIOUS 240
14343 TALLAC AVE 439.29 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 270
14352 TALLAC AVE 445.37 26 AC 40 VERY POOR 270
14365 TALLAC AVE 449.35 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 260
14366 TALLAC AVE 343.20 26 AC 82 SATISFACTORY 189
14394 TALLAC AVE 64.51 26 AC 87 GOOD -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14415 TALLAC AVE 443.68 24 AC 37 VERY POOR 273
14551 TALLAC AVE 441.07 24 AC 31 VERY POOR 283
14563 TALLAC AVE 448.56 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 313
14564 TALLAC AVE 447.60 24 AC 33 VERY POOR 300
15045 TAMARACK AVE 608.00 22 AC 90 GOOD 186
15064 TAMARACK AVE 669.85 38 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 223
22770 TAMARACK AVE 680.04 28 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 192
22787 TAMARACK AVE 587.21 28 AC 69 FAIR 236
14031 TANGLEWOOD DR 1223.92 36 AC 63 FAIR 248
13865 TATA LN 633.40 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 337
13884 TATA LN 242.59 38 AC 50 POOR 276
13885 TATA LN 1161.43 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 256
13886 TATA LN 1446.31 26 AC 52 POOR 219
13887 TATA LN 625.04 26 AC 31 VERY POOR 317
13917 TATA LN 1248.02 24 AC 53 POOR 296
13977 TATA LN 205.64 38 AC 54 POOR 191
22700 TATA LN 1935.76 22 AC 50 POOR 290
22701 TATA LN 1634.14 24 AC 48 POOR 294
22717 TATA LN 952.68 38 AC 74 SATISFACTORY 228
14239 TAYLOR WAY 237.27 20 AC 95 GOOD 236
18891 TAYLOR WAY 767.03 20 AC 95 GOOD 229
18892 TAYLOR WAY 768.52 20 AC 94 GOOD 241
22721 TAYLOR WAY 527.50 20 AC 95 GOOD 202
14976 TERRACE DR 1303.61 26 AC 46 POOR 264
18978 TERRY LN 757.98 30 AC 40 VERY POOR 246
13610 TEXAS AVE 203.32 30 AC 37 VERY POOR 249
22622 TEXAS AVE 903.19 30 AC 39 VERY POOR 262
22623 TEXAS AVE 139.75 30 AC 42 POOR 342
22624 TEXAS AVE 459.58 26 AC 49 POOR 235
22625 TEXAS AVE 78.99 30 AC 56 FAIR 241
22640 TEXAS AVE 1016.97 30 AC 18 SERIOUS 295
14957 TIMBER LAKE PL 202.00 22 AC 47 POOR 313
23364 TIMBER LN 1704.44 22 AC 95 GOOD 189 ONE WAY
16570 TRANSIT WAY 744.68 26 AC 84 SATISFACTORY -1 ONE WAY 13584 TRAVERSE CT 267.60 30 AC 30 VERY POOR 294
18995 TREEHAVEN CT 149.51 26 AC 24 SERIOUS 393
14635 TREEHAVEN DR 384.80 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 251
19996 TREEHAVEN DR 666.14 26 AC 50 POOR 203
19997 TREEHAVEN DR 192.87 26 AC 34 VERY POOR 238
14401 TROUT CREEK AVE 836.89 24 AC 44 POOR 294
13840 TRUCKEE DR 196.27 30 AC 52 POOR 54
22657 TRUCKEE DR 247.47 30 AC 33 VERY POOR 293
22658 TRUCKEE DR 224.36 26 AC 37 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13962 TUCKER AVE 627.95 30 AC 32 VERY POOR 270
14409 TULARE AVE 340.26 30 AC 95 GOOD 259
23332 TULARE AVE 326.53 28 AC 95 GOOD 220
13611 TUOLUMNE DR 332.11 30 AC 37 VERY POOR 247
13613 TUOLUMNE DR 593.97 30 AC 32 VERY POOR 228
13614 TUOLUMNE DR 35.14 30 AC 35 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 19020 UTAH AVE 924.85 26 AC 32 VERY POOR 247
22782 VANDA LEE WAY 359.19 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 397
22785 VANDA LEE WAY 238.07 26 AC 84 SATISFACTORY 327
13508 VENICE DR 1778.89 46 AC 46 POOR 173
13509 VENICE DR 342.79 22 AC 23 SERIOUS 288
13510 VENICE DR 36.50 22 AC 26 VERY POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13511 VENICE DR 35.41 22 AC 41 POOR 347
13512 VENICE DR 352.01 22 AC 46 POOR 48
13548 VENICE DR 1050.28 42 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 169
13807 VENICE DR 295.67 42 AC 79 SATISFACTORY 172
22599 VENICE DR 155.43 42 AC 72 SATISFACTORY 239
22601 VENICE DR 1623.43 42 AC 83 SATISFACTORY 164
22602 VENICE DR 765.83 42 AC 81 SATISFACTORY 219
22605 VENICE DR 639.05 42 AC 86 GOOD 177
22672 VENICE DR 4108.78 42 AC 79 SATISFACTORY 184
19006 VERDON LN 1217.64 28 AC 42 POOR 220
206
TRANS_FEAT STREET NAME LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE TYPE PCI 2022 PCI CATEGORY AVERAGE IRI DTS NOTES 14820 VICTOR ST 211.46 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 347
14786 WALKUP RD 322.37 26 AC 27 VERY POOR 325
14794 WALKUP RD 337.09 26 AC 27 VERY POOR 271
22773 WALKUP RD 222.75 26 AC 27 VERY POOR 318
22774 WALKUP RD 360.69 26 AC 30 VERY POOR 247
22775 WALKUP RD 191.89 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 288
22776 WALKUP RD 452.25 26 AC 33 VERY POOR 267
22791 WALKUP RD 208.14 26 AC 24 SERIOUS 224
13663 WARD WAY 251.99 26 AC 28 VERY POOR 320
18980 WARR RD 1258.06 26 AC 41 POOR 259
13725 WASHINGTON AVE 209.27 28 AC 55 POOR 256
13745 WASHINGTON AVE 487.07 28 AC 100 GOOD 193
13746 WASHINGTON AVE 270.66 28 AC 100 GOOD 206
13846 WASHINGTON AVE 278.40 28 AC 100 GOOD 248
22620 WASHINGTON AVE 125.40 28 AC 27 VERY POOR 226
22630 WASHINGTON AVE 1175.29 28 AC 48 POOR 256
18957 WEDELN CT 607.21 30 AC 43 POOR 292
19015 WEIR WAY 238.90 26 AC 25 SERIOUS 286
22719 WENTWORTH LN 256.02 28 AC 95 GOOD 207
22947 WENTWORTH LN 282.17 28 AC 95 GOOD 198
22948 WENTWORTH LN 773.50 28 AC 94 GOOD 244
14828 WERNER SALAS DR 509.56 26 AC 22 SERIOUS 368
13661 WEST WAY 251.06 26 AC 38 VERY POOR 273
13811 WEST WAY 1859.01 26 AC 51 POOR 222
13567 WHITE SANDS DR 289.63 32 AC 33 VERY POOR 273
13568 WHITE SANDS DR 39.42 32 AC 43 POOR 245
22616 WHITE SANDS DR 1428.53 28 AC 40 VERY POOR 230
13707 WHITNEY DR 51.63 30 AC 21 SERIOUS -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 13708 WHITNEY DR 625.78 30 AC 21 SERIOUS 301
14732 WILDWOOD AVE 368.27 30 AC 45 POOR 296
14972 WILDWOOD AVE 186.21 30 AC 26 VERY POOR 352
14994 WILDWOOD AVE 254.00 32 AC 38 VERY POOR 262
14995 WILDWOOD AVE 247.53 32 AC 66 FAIR 228
14996 WILDWOOD AVE 248.92 32 AC 59 FAIR 255
14997 WILDWOOD AVE 259.47 32 AC 61 FAIR 244
14998 WILDWOOD AVE 231.00 32 AC 54 POOR 213
14999 WILDWOOD AVE 254.18 32 AC 29 VERY POOR 288
15020 WILDWOOD AVE 314.79 32 AC 27 VERY POOR 285
15040 WILDWOOD AVE 230.31 34 AC 23 SERIOUS 370
15043 WILDWOOD AVE 222.14 32 AC 67 FAIR 314
15057 WILDWOOD AVE 188.84 30 AC 80 SATISFACTORY 290
15220 WILDWOOD AVE 340.04 30 AC 67 FAIR 142
15221 WILDWOOD AVE 841.48 30 AC 59 FAIR 130
17879 WILDWOOD AVE 675.71 34 AC 33 VERY POOR 267
22798 WILDWOOD AVE 331.94 30 AC 33 VERY POOR 320
22799 WILDWOOD AVE 324.64 30 AC 32 VERY POOR 354
22800 WILDWOOD AVE 196.63 30 AC 34 VERY POOR 277
22801 WILDWOOD AVE 208.64 30 AC 34 VERY POOR 298
14109 WILLIAM AVE 439.31 26 AC 37 VERY POOR 276
14110 WILLIAM AVE 511.65 26 AC 36 VERY POOR 293
14111 WILLIAM AVE 510.96 26 AC 21 SERIOUS 315
14112 WILLIAM AVE 437.97 26 AC 49 POOR 217
14113 WILLIAM AVE 490.29 26 AC 44 POOR 201
14114 WILLIAM AVE 283.62 26 AC 29 VERY POOR 266
14064 WILLIAM ST 619.15 24 AC 68 FAIR 226
18977 WILLOW AVE 677.64 26 AC 60 FAIR 219
13763 WINNEMUCCA AVE 98.65 30 AC 14 SERIOUS 298
13767 WINNEMUCCA AVE 218.01 30 AC 27 VERY POOR 191
13769 WINNEMUCCA AVE 71.72 30 AC 16 SERIOUS 291
13771 WINNEMUCCA AVE 230.67 30 AC 38 VERY POOR 218
13776 WINNEMUCCA AVE 327.11 30 AC 35 VERY POOR 254
13777 WINNEMUCCA AVE 135.95 30 AC 40 VERY POOR 264
13779 WINNEMUCCA AVE 332.45 30 AC 40 VERY POOR 279
13780 WINNEMUCCA AVE 999.71 30 AC 49 POOR 269
13837 WINNEMUCCA AVE 255.46 30 AC 49 POOR 269
13778 WINNEMUCCA CT 207.40 30 AC 68 FAIR 290
14873 WOODBINE RD 609.94 24 AC 60 FAIR 223
22777 WOODBINE RD 9.80 24 AC 44 POOR -1 TEST SPEED LESS THAN 15 MPH 14790 WOODLAND RD 551.09 28 AC 31 VERY POOR 274
14796 WOODLAND RD 185.64 28 AC 25 SERIOUS 301
14798 WOODLAND RD 332.69 28 AC 26 VERY POOR 287
14799 WOODLAND RD 323.07 28 AC 26 VERY POOR 288
14807 WOODLAND RD 292.00 28 AC 34 VERY POOR 266
14808 WOODLAND RD 235.15 28 AC 45 POOR 208
15087 WOODS AVE 640.16 24 AC 55 POOR 266
13642 WYOMING AVE 917.68 26 AC 50 POOR 223
22627 WYOMING AVE 254.22 26 AC 39 VERY POOR 256
14053 YOUNG ST 340.75 24 AC 68 FAIR 234
14054 YOUNG ST 329.29 24 AC 77 SATISFACTORY 183
207
Pavement
Management
Plan Update
MAY 16, 2023
208
DTS was
hired to
conduct
pavement
analysis in
2022
209
Current Pavement Condition Index
210
Current
Pavement
Condition
Index
211
PCI Distribution
212
Condition of City Roads
Good or
Satisfactory 24%
Fair 14.8%
Poor 30%
Very Poor or
Serious 31.2%
61% of our roads
are currently in
poor or serious
conditions
213
How do Our Roads Compare?
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
City of South
Lake Tahoe
El Dorado
County
Placer County Town of
Truckee
Washoe County California
Agency Reported Network PCIs
We are lagging behind most of our neighbors. The Town of Truckee has the best roads in the region. This is largely due to multiple sales taxes and parcel taxes that are allocated to road and trail maintenance and repair.

PCI
214
Road Repair Tiered
System
•Reconstruction, overlays, etc.
•PCI Range 40-64 - $20.50 to $58.00 per Square Yard
(Minor vs. Major)
•PCI Range 0-39 - $82 per Square Yard
Road Rehab
Program
(Contracted Out)
•Slurry seals, chip seals, micro-overlays, etc.
•$6.50 per Square Yard
•PCI Range 65-85
Maintenance
(Contracted Out
or In-House)
•Crack sealing & pothole patching utilizing the new
zipper & roller
•$1.50 per Square Yard
•PCI Range: 86-95
In House
Maintenance
(In-House)
215
Measure S Information
•One cent sales tax
• Approved by voters November 3, 2020
• Sales tax began collecting April 1, 2021
• $2.5M is set aside for road rehabilitation
annually
• 8 lane miles fully reconstructed or overlayed
since 2021
216
Financial Models
Considered

1. Scenario 1: 5-Year Baseline Scenario: no budget was allocated to see how the roads will deteriorate over five years with no work.

2. Scenario 2: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Worst First): assuming the City's recommended pavement maintenance budget of
$2,500,000 annually for five years to perform maintenance to all roads at the lowest PCI level first. (Recommended Approach)

3. Scenario 3: 5-Year Current Budget Scenario (Best First): assuming the City's recommended pavement maintenance budget of
$2,500,000 annually for five years to perform maintenance to all roads at the highest PCI level first.

4. Scenario 4: 5-Year Budget Scenario (Target PCI of 65): assuming an unlimited pavement maintenance budget to achieve an average network PCI of 65 at the end of the five years.
217
Do Nothing
Scenario
218
Scenario 2:

Financial
Analysis
219
5-Year
Improvement
Model
220
How Do We Prioritize Roads?
Many items are
taken into
consideration, but
in general, arterial and
collector roads (high
volume roads) are prioritized
over lower volume local
roads.

Available Budget
PCI
Utility Projects
Traffic Volumes
Additional Paving on City Projects
Safety & ADA
Drainage Upgrades
Public Feedback
Complete Streets
Upgrades
221
Paving Funds Set Aside
• Public Works has set aside $1.4M
worth of paving funds for two of its
current construction projects.
• Part of the Roadway Rehab program
with different contractors.
• This creates an economy of scale for
the projects, stretches funding, and
reduces neighborhood disturbances.
222
2023 Recommended Roadways
 Ski Run Blvd. – Pioneer Tr. to Needle Pk.
 Ski Run Blvd. – Needle Pk. to Saddle Rd.
 Julie Ln. – Lake Tahoe Blvd. to F St.
 Delta St. – Julie Ln. to Tata Ln.
 B St. – Julie Ln. to Tata Ln.
 F St. – Julie Ln. to Margaret Ave.
 Margaret Ave. – Delta St. to F St.
 Dedi St. – Delta St. to F St.

Add Alternate (Depending on final bids)
 Tata Ln. – Lake Tahoe Blvd. to D St.
 Tata Ln. – D St. to F St.
 D St. – Lake Tahoe Blvd. to Julie Ln.

Current Budget:
$5.992 million available
$1.4 million for 2nd Barton and Tahoe Valley GB
$0.6 million for pothole repair
Net Budget Available: $3.992 million
Base Bid Estimate: $3.8 million - 3.34 miles
Alternate Bid Estimate: $1.4 million – 1.1 miles
223
2023 Paving Program Roadways
224
Design and
Construction Methods
 The City uses “best industry practices” for pavement repair and maintenance
 We use strict specifications for HMA (Hot Mix Asphalt) pavement type and application
 City has a full-time staff for inspection, which is a significant factor in good product delivery
 City has its own laboratory and testing materials for project acceptance
 We have seen no or very limited impacts on recently paved roadways  Most of the potholes this year are along un-treated or older pavement area
In-House LAB
Nuclear Gauge
225
Why Roads are Getting Better

1. Steady funding from different revenue sources

2. Innovative utility reimbursement agreements brought by staff provide even more funding

3. 19 lane miles repaved during the last 5-years (7.84 reconstruction and 11.75 overlayed) Measure S is the biggest
funding source, which
contributes $2.5M annually
Gas Tax passed by California
voters in 2017 contribute
$464,000 annually
In-Lieu Southwest Gas has
Contributed approximately
$4.90M over the previous
4 years
STPUD will be contributing
their fair share this fall and
likely more in the coming
years
226
Questions
227
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 10
Agenda Item: Washoe Tribe Land Acknowledgement Presentation and Resolution Executive Summary: On March 28, 2023, Council Member Friedrich asked, and Mayor Pro Tem Bass seconded that a Washoe Tribe Land Acknowledgement Presentation and Resolution be brought back to City Council for review and consideration. Herman Fillmore, the Culture/Language Resources Director for the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California will make a presentation to City Council.

A land acknowledgment is a custom in many Native nations and communities that dates back centuries.

It is a way of paying formal recognition to the original inhabitants as the traditional stewards of the land upon which one resides or is gathered. A land acknowledgement is a way to express gratitude and appreciation to Indigenous peoples, to provide education around the complex history surrounding Native nations, and to take an important first step toward meaningful support for and in partnership with Indigenous organizations and individuals. This item provides a brief history of the original inhabitants of Tahoe Basin lands. The land acknowledgement will be shared across the City, with staff, board and commissions who will be encouraged and supported in adopting its use during meetings and events. A land acknowledgment is only the first step toward meaningful engagement and collaboration with the Washoe Tribe.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive Presentation from Washoe Tribe and Pass a Resolution acknowledging the Washoe Tribe land acknowledgement.

Responsible Staff Member: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager Responsible Staff Member: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager - (530) 542-6043 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff_Report_-_Washoe_Tribe_Presentation__1_.docx
02-Resolution-_Washoe_Tribe_Land_Acknowledgement.docx
228
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Washoe Tribe Land Acknowledgement Presentation and Resolution Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager (530) 542-6043 Background: On March 28, 2023, Council Member Friedrich asked, and Mayor Pro Tem Bass seconded that a Washoe Tribe Land Acknowledgement Presentation and Resolution be brought back to City Council for review and consideration. Herman Fillmore, the Culture/Language Resources Director for the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California will be in attendance to present and answer any questions City Council may have.

Issue and Discussion: A land acknowledgment is a custom in many Native nations and communities that dates back centuries. It is a way of paying formal recognition to the original inhabitants as the traditional stewards of the land upon which one resides or is gathered. A land acknowledgement is a way to express gratitude and appreciation to Indigenous peoples, to provide education around the complex history surrounding Native nations, and to take an important first step toward meaningful support for and in partnership with Indigenous organizations and individuals.

This item provides a brief history of the original inhabitants of Tahoe Basin lands. The land acknowledgement will be shared across the City, with staff, board and commissions who will be encouraged and supported in adopting its use during meetings and events. A land acknowledgment is only the first step toward meaningful engagement and collaboration with the Washoe Tribe.

Proposed Washoe Land Acknowledgement
The City of South Lake Tahoe acknowledges the lands we occupy today are the aboriginal lands and home of the Waší∙šiw, the people from here known today as the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, a sovereign nation. For thousands of years before the arrival of any other people, the Washoe lived here and relied on these lands for survival.

Hunting, fishing, and gathering of traditional foods and medicines within their homelands were an integral part of the Washoe culture. Through this intrinsic relationship the Washoe helped shape the natural beauty of the Lake Tahoe Basin that millions enjoy today. With the influx of settlers during the gold rush era, the Washoe summer camps became prime locations for logging and cattle grazing and the Washoe were no longer allowed to manage their lands as they had done for millenniums.

Therefore, in recognition and acknowledgement of the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, the City of South Lake Tahoe wishes to honor and respect the Waší∙šiw as the original people of this place whose lands we now occupy. Further, we are committed to fostering collaboration and partnership with the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California to protect, respect, and care for "Da aw", Lake Tahoe.
229
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Financial Implications: None associated with this item.

Environmental Considerations: Not a project. This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guildelines section 15378(b)(2) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

Policy Implications: Passing a Resolution acknowledging the Washoe Tribe land acknowledgement is consistent with Priority 3 “Community for All” of the City’s 2023-2028 Strategic Plan.
230
Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2023-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 16, 2023
Washoe Tribe Land Acknowledgement

BACKGROUND
A. On March 28, 2023, Council Member Friedrich asked, and Mayor Pro Tem Bass seconded that a Washoe Tribe Land Acknowledgement Presentation and Resolution be brought back to City Council for review and consideration.

B. On May 16, 2023, Herman Fillmore, the Culture/Language Resources Director for the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California made a presentation to the City Council.

C. A land acknowledgment is a custom in many Native nations and communities that dates back centuries. It is a way of paying formal recognition to the original inhabitants as the traditional stewards of the land upon which one resides or is gathered. A land acknowledgement is a way to express gratitude and appreciation to Indigenous peoples, to provide education around the complex history surrounding Native nations, and to take an important first step toward meaningful support for and in partnership with Indigenous organizations and individuals.

D. The land acknowledgement will be shared across the City, with staff, board and commissions who will be encouraged and supported in adopting its use during meetings and events. A land acknowledgment is only the first step toward meaningful engagement and collaboration with the Washoe Tribe.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

Acknowledges the lands we occupy today are the aboriginal lands and home of the Waší∙šiw, the people from here known today as the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, a sovereign nation. For thousands of years before the arrival of any other people, the Washoe lived here and relied on these lands for survival.

Hunting, fishing, and gathering of traditional foods and medicines within their homelands were an integral part of the Washoe culture. Through this intrinsic relationship the Washoe helped shape the natural beauty of the Lake Tahoe Basin that millions enjoy today. With the influx of settlers during the gold rush era, the Washoe summer camps became prime locations for logging and cattle grazing and the Washoe were no longer allowed to manage their lands as they had done for millenniums.

Therefore, in recognition and acknowledgement of the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, the City of South Lake Tahoe wishes to honor and respect the Waší∙šiw as the original people of this place whose lands we now occupy. Further, we are committed to fostering collaboration and partnership with the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California to protect, respect, and care for DáɁaw, Lake Tahoe. 231
Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 16, 2023 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________ Date:___________
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Attest:
____________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
232
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 11
Agenda Item: Grant Application to Tahoe Network of Fire Adapted Communities for $969,692 for Defensible Space Inspectors and Chipper Crew
Executive Summary: In February 2020, TRCD approached SLTFR regarding funding available as a sub-recipient through this round 18 SNPLMA funding to assist in the City’s efforts within the TNFAC. This funding is available to pass-through to the City to fund the hiring of three, seasonal temporary, part-time Defensible Space Inspectors, whose salaries will be paid from the grant funding. SLTFR staff has been coordinating with TRCD, City HR and Finance to develop costs, scope of work, and information necessary to create a Defensible Space Inspection Program funded through this grant opportunity. South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue intends to utilize three seasonal temporary Defensible Space Inspectors to carry out TNFAC operations within the City of South Lake Tahoe city limits and within the TFFT South Shore Division. During inspections, the Defensible Space Inspectors will provide information on defensible space compliance, free curbside chipping as well as engage and identify neighborhood leaders and look to prioritize community assistance funds to the community. They will also follow up with re-inspections of properties to confirm and track compliance across parcels. South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue will be identifying target hazard areas annually where they plan to inspect whole neighborhoods within the City. SLTFR will be working closely with the California Tahoe Conservancy and look to align and prioritize work with their staff. SLTFR Defensible Space Inspectors will coordinate outreach and education to target neighborhood leaders and establish Fire Adapted Communities within the targeted neighborhoods within the community. South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue will also be encouraging these FAC’s to become recognized FIREWISE communities as well. Funding will also be utilized to fund the South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue Chipper crew to provide community roadside chipping for homeowners to help reduce fuel loading around homes improving defensible space and chipping assistance during community work days. The total funding will be utilized to fund this program for 5.5 years.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving a Tahoe Network of Fire Adapted Communities (TNFAC) sub-recipient grant application submittal to Tahoe Resource Conservation District (TRCD) in the amount of $969,692.65 for hiring of three seasonal part-time Defensible Space Inspectors and funding the South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue Chipper crew.

Responsible Staff Members: Jay Manning, Battalion Chief and Lori Marino, Principal Management Analyst
Responsible Staff Member: Jay Manning, Battalion Chief (530) 542-6164, and Lori Marino, Principal Management Analyst (530) 542-7410
Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
233
01-Staff Report - TRCD Defensible Space Funding.docx
02-Resolution-TRCD Defensible Space Funding.docx
234
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Tahoe Resource Conservation District, Tahoe Network of Fire Adapted Communities Sub-Recipient Grant Application
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Members: Jay Manning, Battalion Chief (530) 542-6164, and Lori Marino, Principal Management Analyst (530) 542-7410
Background: On October 7, 2021 the Secretary of the Interior approved Round 18 - Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act (SNPLMA) appropriations. This included $8,705,302 in funding for the Lake Tahoe Basin Fire Adapted Communities Project applied for by the Tahoe Resource Conservation District (TRCD). South Lake Tahoe Fire submitted a budget to the TRCD of $969,692.65 to complete the South Shore Division portions of this Basin-wide project. Implementation will begin in summer 2023 with three defensible space inspectors funded seasonally and free curbside chipping by the SLTFR Chipping Crew. Community workdays will be supported with the chipping program.

In February 2021, TRCD approached SLTFR regarding funding available as a subrecipient through this round 16 SNPLMA funding to assist in the City’s efforts within the TNFAC. The funding approved in 2021 and 2022 to the City, funded the hiring of two, temporary, part-time Defensible Space Inspectors in 2021 and three in 2022, whose salaries were paid from the grant funding. Funding created a Defensible Space Inspection Program for the City of South Lake Tahoe that allowed us to inspect 5,505 properties for defensible space to date of which 1,034 were compliant based and interacted 171 times with residents sharing information about proper defensible space around homes through this unique grant opportunity.

The TRCD has again approached the city to be a sub-recipient for the 2023 Season thru June 2028 to assist the city with our defensible space program and curbside chipping program. The TRCD requires submittal of a sub-recipient grant application for approval to initiate a grant award. This is non-competitive funding. Staff is seeking City Council approval to submit a grant application in the amount of $969,692.65 to the TRCD to hire three temporary, part-time/ grant funded, Defensible Space Inspectors each season thru June of 2028 as well as funding for the SLTFR Chipping Crew to conduct curbside chipping within the Tahoe Fire and Fuels Team South Shore Division, and authorize the City Manager, or Fire Chief to sign and submit all documents, including but not limited to 235
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 2
applications, agreement amendments, payment requests, and necessary documents for the completion of the grant scope.

Issue and Discussion: South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue intends to utilize three Defensible Space Inspectors to carry out TNFAC operations within the City of South Lake Tahoe city limits. During inspections, the Defensible Space Inspectors will provide information on defensible space compliance, free curbside chipping as well as engage and identify neighborhood leaders and look to prioritize community assistance funds to the community. They will also follow up with re-inspections of properties to confirm and track compliance across parcels.

South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue will be identifying target hazard areas annually where they plan to inspect whole neighborhoods within the city. SLTFR will be working closely with the California Tahoe Conservancy and look to align and prioritize work with their staff.

SLTFR Defensible Space Inspectors will coordinate outreach and education to target neighborhood leaders and establish Fire Adapted Communities within the targeted neighborhoods within the community. South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue will also be encouraging these FAC’s to become recognized FIREWISE communities as well.

Financial Implications: Application submitted will be in an amount of $969,692.65 to fund the following costs:

Salaries and Benefits: $641,394.00
Mileage: $23,679.77
DSI Uniforms: $11,700.00
Office and Field Supplies: $10,200.00
Equipment Reimbursement Chipper Truck and Chipper: $194,565.00 TRCD Grant Admin Cost: $88,153.88
Funds will be reimbursed in arrears on a quarterly basis.

Upon award, funds should be appropriated into the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget as follows:

New Account# 215-02240 Fire Defensible Space Program
Revenue 33320: TRCD $881,538.77 (grant amount less TRCD Grant Admin cost) Payroll Expense 41XXX: Temporary/Part time and Benefits $641,394.00 Other Expense 45010: Uniforms and Supplies $21,900
Transfer Out 50001: Equipment Reimbursement $194,565.00 Transfer Out 50001: Mileage Reimbursement $23,679.77
Environmental Considerations: Defensible space provides a fuel buffer for structures and other flammable fuels as well as provides firefighters access from which to defend a threatened area. The proposed action of applying for the grant funds is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(2) because it is a continuing administrative or maintenance activity such as purchases for supplies and personnel-related actions.

Policy Implications: Per Financial Management- Grant Funding and Compliance Policy approved by City Council on Sept. 8, 2020; section 2.3 City Council Approval to Apply:

City Council approval to apply is required for ALL Grant Applications. A detailed staff 236
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 3
report and a resolution (if required) should be brought forth to City Council for Council approval/adoption.
237
Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2023-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 16, 2023
TRCD Tahoe Network of Fire Adapted Communities Sub-Recipient Grant Application

BACKGROUND
A. Tahoe Resource Conservation District (TRCD) was awarded a grant in the amount of $8,705,302.00 from the Bureau of Land Management, through round 18 of the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act (SNPLMA) for fire fuels reductions and similar services as a collaborative effort within the Tahoe Network of Fire Adapted Communities (TNFAC).

B. The TRCD has available funding to pass-through to South Tahoe Fire Rescue as a Sub-recipient to fund the hiring of three, temporary, part-time Defensible Space Inspectors, whose salaries will be paid from the grant funding.

C. The South Tahoe Fire Rescue will enter into an agreement with the Tahoe Resource Conservation District to carry out City of South Lake Tahoe, Defensible Space Inspection Program and fund the SLTFR Community Curbside Chipping Program.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Approves the filing of an application in the amount of $969,692.65 for “Defensible Space Inspection Program”

2. Certifies that the City of South Lake Tahoe has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project.

3. Certifies that if approved, funds under the jurisdiction of The City of South Lake Tahoe are available to begin the project.

4. Certifies that said applicant will expend grant funds in accordance with Grant Sub-Recipient Agreement Between Tahoe Resource Conservation District and the City of South Lake Tahoe.

5. Appoints City Manager or a designee to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.

6. Accepts the grant funds and authorize the Finance Director to appropriate the funds into the Fiscal Year 2023-2028 budgets on initial and carry forward basis as follows:

REVENUE EXPENSE
Fund/Account Description (Increase)/Decrease Increase/(Decrease) 215-02240-33320 Other - Local Grants (TRCD) (881,539)
215-02240-41XXX Payroll Expense - Temp/Part Time and Benefits 641,394 215-02240-45010 General Supplies - Uniforms and Supplies 21,900 215-02240-50001 Transfer out - Equipment Reimbursement 194,565 215-02240-50001 Transfer out - Equipment Mileage Reimbursement 23,680 100-02240-363xx Transfer in - Equipment & Mileage Reimbursement (218,245) 238
Resolution 2023-XXX May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 16, 2023, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Mayor Cristi Creegan
Attest:
_________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
239
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 12
Agenda Item: Electric Vehicle Charging Station Ordinance (First Reading) Executive Summary: California Assembly Bill 1236 requires jurisdictions with a population less than 200,000 residents to establish procedures for expedited, streamlined processes for permitting of electric vehicle charging stations. In response to this legislation, the Development Services Department developed an application checklist and prioritizes the review of EV charging station applications.

However, adoption of the recommended ordinance will codify existing practices for review or EV charging station permit applications and bring the City into compliance with AB 1236.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion to hold a first reading (by title only) of an Ordinance amending the South Lake Tahoe City Code Sections 6.15.160 to codify procedures for expediting permitting processing for electric vehicle charging systems and refer second reading and adoption to the June 6, 2023 meeting.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services (530) 542-6024 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - EV Charging.docx
02-PC Resolution 2023-005 EV Charging
03-Ordinance - EV Charging.docx
240
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Electric Vehicle Charging Station Ordinance
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Background: Assembly Bill 1236, which amended Government Code Section 65850.7 to require jurisdictions with a population less than 200,000 residents to establish procedures for expedited, streamlined processes for permitting of electric vehicle charging stations. The amendments to Section 65850.7 include the requirement for a jurisdiction to adopt an ordinance for the expedited, streamlined process. The ordinance shall include the requirement that a jurisdiction adopt a checklist of requirements with which a permit application for an electric vehicle charging station will be eligible for expedited review.

In response to this legislation, the Development Services Department developed an application checklist and prioritizes the review of EV charging station applications.

Issue and Discussion: AB 1236 specifically requires local jurisdictions to adopt a streamlining ordinance. Although the City Code Section 6.15.160, Amendments, Additions and Deletions to the Adopted Codes, currently includes language regarding expedited permitting for electric vehicle charging stations, the City Code does not include the specifics required by AB 1236. The proposed text is consistent with the Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Guidebook published by the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development and templates provided by the California Building Officials.

Adoption of the recommended ordinance will codify existing practices for review or EV charging station permit applications and bring the City into compliance with AB 1236.

At their April 20, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2023-005 recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed City Code amendments.

Financial Implications: There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of the recommended action.

Environmental Considerations: The proposed ordinance is exempt from environmental review per CEQA Guidelines under the General Rule (Section 15061(b)(3)), as the project involves updates and revisions to existing regulations. The proposed code amendments are consistent with California law, specifically Government Code section 65850.7. It can be seen with certainty that the proposed code amendments will have no significant effect on the environment, and are, therefore, not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
241
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 2
of 2
Policy Implications: The proposed action is consistent with the City Climate Action Plan Strategy 3: Electric Vehicles (EVs) – Increase the Use of EVs to Reduce Emissions from Passenger and Transit Vehicles.
242
Resolution 2023-005 April 20, 2023 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2023- 005
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
Planning Commission
April 20, 2023

RECOMMENDING THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY COUNCIL
AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 6.15.160.H SETTING FORTH PROCEDURES

FOR EXPEDITING PERMITTING PROCESSING FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE

CHARGING SYSTEMS

BACKGROUND
A. The State of California and the City of South Lake Tahoe has consistently promoted and encouraged the use of fuel-efficient electric vehicles; and B. The State of California adopted Assembly Bill 1236, which requires local agencies to adopt an ordinance that creates an expedited and streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging systems; and C. Creation of an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations would facilitate convenient charging of electric vehicles and help reduce the City’s reliance on environmentally damaging fossil fuels.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission:

1. Does hereby recommend that the City Council find that the proposed ordinance is exempt for environmental review per CEQA Guidelines under the General Rule (Section 15061( b)(3)), as the project involves updates and revisions to existing regulations. The proposed code amendments are consistent with California law, specifically Government Code section 65850. 7 and the CA Health & Safety Code Sections 17958. 7 and 18941. 5.

It can be seen with certainty that the proposed code amendments will have no significant effect on the environment.

2. Does hereby recommend that the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council amend City Code Section 6.15.160 to codify procedures for expediting permitting processing for electric vehicle charging systems ( Exhibit A). 243
Resolution 2023-005 April 20, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission on April 20, 2023 by the following vote:

Yes: Howard, Roberts, Speal, and Wieczorek

Absent: Feiger
Date: ___________
Natalia Wieczorek, Chair
Attest:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission.

Sue Blankenship (Apr 24, 2023 08:45 PDT)
Natalia Wieczorek (Apr 24, 2023 08:54 PDT)
Apr 24, 2023
244
Resolution 2023- 005
Exhibit A

6.15.160 Amendments, additions and deletions to the adopted codes.

A. California Building Code Section 105.5.1, California Residential Code Section R105.5.1, California Plumbing Code Section 104.4.3.1, California Mechanical Code Section 104.4.3.1 and California Electrical Code Article 89, 108.4.1 are hereby amended to read as follows:

Every permit issued by the building official under the provision of this code shall become invalid and expired unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within 12 months after its issuance, or if the work authorized on the site by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 12 months after the time the work is commenced. The Building Official is authorized to grant, in writing, one or more extensions of time, for periods not more than 180 days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. In order to renew action on an invalid permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee and be accompanied with updated construction documents to reflect compliance with the most recent applicable codes based on the new submittal date.

B. Any permittee holding an unexpired permit for a new structure or addition may apply for an extension of the time for which work may be completed under that permit when the permittee is unable to complete work within the time required by this section for good and satisfactory reasons. The building official may extend a permit for a period not exceeding 180 days on written request by the permittee. The written request shall be submitted to the building official prior to the expiration date of the original permit. The request for an extension of an existing permit shall show that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented completion of the work authorized by the permit. No permit may be extended more than three years cumulatively.

C. California Building Code Section 109.2, California Fire Code Section 106.2, California Residential Code Section R108.2., California Plumbing Code Section 104.5, California Mechanical Code Section 104.5 and California Electrical Code Article 80.19(H)(4) are hereby amended to read as follows:

The fee for each permit shall be as set forth in this section and by city council resolution.

The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this code shall be made by the building official/ fire code official. The value to be used in computing the building permit and building plan review fees shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems, and any other permanent equipment. Fees shall be determined by the valuation as shown for good construction on the valuation table as published annually in the November/ December issue of Building Standards magazine. Values shall be 100 percent of the valuation given in the basic valuation table. Fees shall be adjusted on the first day of January each year.

The fee shall be as specified through adoption of resolution by the city council.

EXCEPTION: Major projects for which the city contracts for inspection and/ or plan review services shall be charged permit fees in accordance with the above section. Costs of 245
Resolution 2023- 005
additional plan review and/ or overtime inspections required for project fast-tracking, or contractor scheduling, or due to changes in plans, shall be paid by the owner on a monthly basis. The fees shall be equal to the cost of service plus a 25 percent administrative fee.

The owner shall provide on-site office space for the resident inspector. Such office space shall be private and under the exclusive control of the resident inspector. Electric power, heat and phone service shall be provided to the office. Such office shall be maintained on-site until the final certificate of occupancy is issued.

For work requiring a permit not described on the valuation table, the valuation shall be determined by contract price for the work, subject to review by the building official.

The minimum permit fee under this section shall be as specified through adoption of resolution by the city council. Additional plan review as a result of incomplete submittals or changes to plans after approval of such plans will be charged a plan review fee.

A reinspection fee shall be charged for scheduled inspections when the work, for which an inspection was requested, is not ready for inspection. A reinspection fee shall also apply to additional inspections after the initial inspection for verifying correction of items noted in a correction notice.

Special inspection fees shall be charged with a one-hour minimum charge. Any inspections requested outside of regular work hours will be charged a three- hour minimum charge.

D. California Building Code Section 115.4, California Fire Code Section 107.4, and California Residential Code Section R114.4 are hereby amended to read as follows:

When a stop work order is issued an investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The permit fee for work without a permit shall be twice the normal permit fee. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law.

E. International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) Section 107, Notices and Orders. Add the following text at the end of subsection 107.2, Item 4:

The maximum time limit shall be determined by the city building official based upon the condition of the structure and the potential hazard involved. Once such determination has been made, the building official shall serve a copy of a notice and order which specifies the dangerous condition to be remedied, together with the timeline for correction, as determined by the building official. Prior to the expiration date specified in the notice and order, the property owner shall perform either the rehabilitation, renovation or removal, as set forth in the notice and order.

Abatement of abandoned or substantially damaged non dwelling unit structures shall be subject to the provisions contained in Chapter 4.60 SLTCC. 246
Resolution 2023- 005
F. Authority to Utilize Alternate Method of Recovery of Cost of Demolition. In any case where the city has found it necessary to undertake an abatement process to demolish a structure which has been found by the building official to be unsafe, as defined within Section 108 of the International Property Maintenance Code, the city may elect, at its discretion, to recover costs of such abatement using the methods prescribed in subsection ( G) of this section as an alternative to the procedure outlined in Sections 110.3 and 109.4 et seq. of the aforementioned code.

G. Alternate Method of Recovery of Cost of Demolition.

1. Prior to commencement of any demolition activity undertaken as part of the abatement of an unsafe structure, the city shall take all necessary steps to ensure that all development rights which may be present on the parcel are appropriately banked with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and the South Tahoe Public Utility District.

All such rights, which may include, but not be limited to, development rights, allocations, commercial square footage, hard and soft coverage rights, and sewer units, shall be banked to remain on the parcel upon which the demolition activity will be completed.

2. Upon completion of all demolition activities, an accounting of expenses shall be completed by the administrative services director and a public hearing to consider confirmation of the costs of the abatement shall be scheduled, noticed and conducted in accordance with Section 107 et seq. of the International Property Maintenance Code.

The notice mailed to the owner of record for the property which is the subject of the abatement process shall contain a statement which substantively reads as follows:

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER
Development rights attributable to your property and recognized by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency have been banked with that agency. These rights have considerable value. In order to retain ownership of these development rights, you must pay any and all costs of the abatement process which may be confirmed by the City Council at the scheduled hearing no later than sixty- five (65) days following the date of said hearing.

Your failure to pay the confirmed costs of said abatement within sixty- five (65) days of the date of the hearing will result in FORFEITURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR PROPERTY.

SUCH FORFEITURE MAY ULTIMATELY PROHIBIT YOU OR ANYONE IN THE FUTURE FROM REDEVELOPING YOUR PROPERTY.

3. Upon completion of the hearing process to confirm the costs of the abatement process, the owner of the property subject to the abatement shall have 65 days from the date of the hearing to pay all costs of the abatement which have been confirmed by the city council. In the event all costs are not paid within the specified time period, the city shall notify the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency of the city council’s 247
Resolution 2023- 005
confirmation of costs of the abatement process and the failure of the property owner to pay said costs, and shall request that the Tahoe regional planning agency approve forfeiture of all development rights banked to be vested with the city of South Lake Tahoe. Such forfeiture and vesting shall become effective 21 days after such approval is granted.

H. Expedited Permit Process for Photovoltaic and Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. To California Building Code Section 107.3 the following subsection shall be added:

Expedited Permit Process for Small Residential Rooftop Systems Solar Systems and Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

1. Definitions. As used in this section:

Electronic submittal” means the utilization of electronic e-mail or submittal of an application via the internet. On or more of the following:
a. Electronic mailFacsimile or email
b. The internet
Electric vehicle charging station” or “charging station” means any level of electric vehicle supply equipment station that is designed and built in compliance with Article 625 of the California Electrical Code, as it reads on the effective date of this Chapter, and delivers electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a plug-in electric vehicle.” Reasonable restrictions” on a solar energy system are those restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency or specified performance, or that allow for an alternative system of comparable cost, efficiency, and energy conservation benefits. “
Specific, adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

Restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency or specified performance” means:

1. For water heater systems or solar swimming pool heating systems: an amount exceeding ten (10) percent of the cost of the system, but in no case more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or decreasing the efficiency of the solar energy system by an amount exceeding ten (10) percent, as originally specified and proposed.

2. For photovoltaic systems: an amount not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) over the system cost as originally specified and proposed, or a decrease in system efficiency of an amount exceeding ten (10) percent as originally specified and proposed.

Small residential rooftop solar energy system” means all of the following:
a.1. A solar energy system that is no larger than ten (10) kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating or thirty (30) kilowatts thermal.
248
Resolution 2023- 005
b.2. A solar energy system that conforms to all applicable State fire, structural, electrical, and other building codes as adopted or amended by the county and paragraph ( iii) of subdivision ( c) of Section 714 of the Civil Code, as such section or subdivision may be amended, renumbered, or designated from time to time.
c. 3. A solar energy system that is installed on a single- or duplex- family dwelling. d. 4. A solar panel or module array that does not exceed the maximum legal building height as defined by the authority having jurisdiction. “ Solar energy system” has the same meaning set forth in paragraphs ( 1) and (2) of subdivision ( a) of Section 801.5 of the Civil Code, as such section or subdivision may be amended, renumbered, or designated from time to time.

Specific adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

2. Small Residential Rooftop Solar Systems
a. All solar energy systems and electric vehicle charging stations shall meet applicable health and safety standards and requirements imposed by the state and the City of South Lake Tahoe.
b. All solar energy systems and electric vehicle charging stations shall be certified by an accredited listing agency.
c. All energy systems for producing and or supplying electricity shall meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability.
d. Proof of approval by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency must be presented with application.
ed. Proof of approval by local utility must be presented with application.

3. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
a. PurposeURPOSE. The purpose of this Chapter is to promote and encourage the use of electric vehicles by creating an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations while promoting public health and safety and preventing specific adverse impacts in the installation and use of such charging stations. This Chapter is also purposed to comply with California Government Code Section 65850.7. b. Expedited Permitting ProcessEXPEDITED PERMITTING PROCESS. Consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall implement an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations, and adopt a checklist of all requirements with which electric vehicle charging stations shall comply with in order to be eligible for expedited review. The expedited, streamlined permitting process and checklist 249
Resolution 2023- 005
may refer to the recommendations contained in the most current version of the “Plug- In Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Permitting Checklist” of the “Zero- Emission Vehicles in California:

Community Readiness Guidebook” as published by the Governor’ s Office of Planning and Research. The City’s adopted checklist shall be published on the City’s website. c. Permit Application ProcessingPERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSING. i) Prior to submitting an application for processing, the applicant shall verify that the installation of an electric vehicle charging station will not have specific, adverse impact to public health and safety and building occupants. Verification by the applicant includes but is not limited to: electrical system capacity and loads; electrical system wiring, bonding and overcurrent protection; building infrastructure affected by charging station equipment and associated conduits; areas of charging station equipment and vehicle parking. ( ii) A permit application that satisfies the information requirements in the City’s adopted checklist shall be deemed complete and be promptly processed. Upon confirmation by the Building Official that the permit application and supporting documents meets the requirements of the City- adopted checklist, and is consistent with all applicable laws and health and safety standards, the Building Official shall, consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, approve the application and issue all necessary permits. Such approval does not authorize an applicant to energize or utilize the electric vehicle charging station until approval is granted by the City. If the Building Official determines that the permit application is incomplete, he or she shall issue a written correction notice to the applicant, detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance.
iii) Consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall allow for electronic submittal of permit applications covered by this Ordinance and associated supporting documentations. In accepting such permit applications, the Building Official shall also accept electronic signatures on all forms, applications, and other documentation in lieu of a wet signature by any applicant.
d. Technical Review.TECHNICAL REVIEW
i) It is the intent of this Ordinance to encourage the installation of electric vehicle charging stations by removing obstacles to permitting for charging stations so long as the action does not supersede the Building Official’s authority to address higher priority life-safety situations.

If the Building Official makes a finding based on substantial evidence that the electric vehicle charging station could have a specific adverse impact upon the public health or safety, as defined in this Chapter, the City may require the applicant to apply for a use permit. ii) In the technical review of a charging station, consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall not condition the approval for any electric vehicle charging station permit on the approval of such a system by an association, as that term is defined by Civil Code Section 4080.
e. Electric Vehicle Charging Station Installation Requirements. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING

STATION INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS (
i) Electric vehicle charging station equipment shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code, the Society of Automotive Engineers, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories, and rules of the Public Utilities Commission or a Municipal Electric Utility Company regarding safety and reliability.
250
Resolution 2023- 005
ii) Installation of electric vehicle charging stations and associated wiring, bonding, disconnecting means and overcurrent protective devices shall meet the requirements of Article 625 and all applicable provisions of the California Electrical Code. ( iii) Installation of electric vehicle charging stations shall be incorporated into the load calculations of all new or existing electrical services and shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code. Electric vehicle charging equipment shall be considered a continuous load. (
iv) Anchorage of either floor- mounted or wall- mounted electric vehicle charging stations shall meet the requirements of the California Building or Residential Code as applicable per occupancy, and the provisions of the manufacturer’ s installation instructions. Mounting of charging stations shall not adversely affect building elements.

I. Fire Watch. California Fire Code Section 403.11.1, Fire Watch Personnel, is hereby amended to read as follows:

When, in the opinion of the fire code official, it is essential for public safety in a place of assembly or any other occupancy, because of the number of persons, or the nature of the noncompliance with the California Fire Code and/ or the nature of the performance, exhibition, display, contest or activity, the fire code official may require the owner, agent or lessee, to provide one or more fire watch personnel to perform fire watch duties during the times such places are open to the public, or when such activity requiring a fire watch is being conducted.

J. Building Address. Section 502.1 of the California Building Code, California Fire Code Section 505.1 and Section R319.1 of the California Residential Code are hereby amended to read as follows:

Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided for all new buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Address numbers and internal illumination shall be maintained. The addresses for new dwellings shall be posted with a minimum of four inch (4") high numbers with proportionate width that are plainly visible from the street. During hours of darkness, the numbers shall be internally illuminated. Posted numbers shall be placed on a contrasting background.

Where building setbacks exceed one hundred feet (100') from the street or road fronting the property, additional contrasting six inch (6") high numbers shall be displayed at the property entrance. The addresses for new multi-family, new commercial and new industrial buildings shall be posted with a minimum of six-inch (6") high by three- quarters inch (3/4") stroke numbers. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically illuminated. New multi-family, new commercial and new industrial buildings shall display address/ suite numbers or letters six-inch (6") high by three- quarters inch (3/4") stroke placed on a contrasting background on the front and rear doors of each suite/ unit.

K. Fire Access Grade. California Fire Code Section 503.2.7 is hereby amended to read as follows:
503.2.7 Grade. The grade of the fire apparatus access road shall be within the limits established by the fire code official based on the fire department’ s apparatus. Where driveways serving one- and two- family dwelling units have a driveway gradient 251
Resolution 2023- 005
exceeding eight percent (8%), a separate emergency egress path of travel from the primary entrance of each dwelling unit to the public way shall be provided. All components of the separate emergency egress path of travel shall comply with all applicable provisions of the California Building Code.

L. Wildland- Urban Interface ( WUI). California Building Code Chapter 7A, California Fire Code Chapter 49 and California Residential Code Section R337 are adopted in their entirety with the amendments to read as follows:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE IS DESIGNATED AS VERY- HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE. For purposes of clarification and enforcement of the following shall be added to each chapter preface: The City of South Lake Tahoe has adopted Ordinance 2019-1131 which designates all areas within the City of South Lake Tahoe a Very High Fire Severity Zone.

M. Freeze Protection. California Building Code and California Fire Code Section 903 are hereby added to the California Building Code and the California Fire Code to read as follows:

All sprinkler systems shall be suitably freeze- protected for climatic conditions as prescribed by the fire code official.

N. Roof Fire Rating. California Building Code Section 1505.1.1 and California Residential Code Section R902.1.1 are written here for emphasis and clarity:

The entire roof covering of every existing structure where more than 50 percent of the total roof area is replaced within any one-year period, the entire roof covering of every new structure, and any roof covering applied in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof of every existing structure, shall be a fire-retardant roof covering that is at least Class A.

O. Snowshed Impact Areas. Add to California Building Code Section 1608.1 and to California Residential Code Section R301.2.3:

Snow shed Impact Areas Protection of Required Entries/ Exits, Parking, and Driveways.

1. Roof surfaces and photovoltaic panels that are susceptible to rooftop avalanche risk shall be designed so that snow shed impact areas will not occur in or on entries/ exits required exits only for R-3 occupancies), vehicle parking areas, driveways, LPG storage tanks, gas meters, electrical meters, walkways, and public ways.

2. The minimum snow shed impact area shall have a setback of ten feet measured horizontally from a vertical line projecting from the roof eave to the other constructed elements such as fences, sheds, and patio covers.

3. The snow shed impact area may be eliminated provided an engineered snow restraint system, designed in accordance with this code, is incorporated into the roof design and, in other than R-3 occupancies, an approved roof drainage system (e.g., heated gutter and downspout) is installed to prevent ice formation/ accumulation at the grade or access level.
252
Resolution 2023- 005

4. Property owners shall maintain snow shed impact areas to prevent snow from encroaching beyond the impact area boundaries.

5. Existing structures may use engineered snow slide restraint devices without an approved roof drainage system to reduce hazards associated with the existing roof design.

P. Ice Dam Membrane. Add Section 1507.1.2 to the California Building Code and Section R9045.1.2 to the California Residential Code as follows:

Title 15-10: An “Ice Guard” is required on roofs of heated areas of buildings. Roofs, regardless of covering, with a pitch of less than 8 in 12 shall be protected against leakage ( caused by ice and snow) using an approved manufactured membrane installed per the manufacturer’ s specifications and as approved by the building official. This application shall extend from the eave edge of the roof up the roof slope measured 5 feet beyond the wall line separating the conditioned and unconditioned space, and up 30 inches along each side of a valley. This “Ice Guard” shall be in addition to any other required underlayment.

Q. Local Design Criteria. Amend California Building Code Section 1603 and California Residential Code Table R301.2, Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria, by adding the following design criteria values as listed below in items 1 through 8 to read as follows:

1. Ground Snow Load: 150 PSF

2. Wind Design Speed: (Based on the ASCE 7-10 code cycle) Risk Category 1: 110 mph
Risk Category 2: 120 mph
Risk Category 3: 130 mph
Risk Category 4: 130 mph

3. Seismic Design Category: D

4. Subject to Weathering from Weathering: Negligible

5. Frost Line Depth: 18 inches

6. Termites: Yes

7. Climate Zone: 16

8. Ice Barrier Underlayment Required: Yes
R. Snow Loads. Add Section 1608.4 to the California Building Code and Section R301.2.3.1 to the California Residential Code as follows:
253
Resolution 2023- 005
All of the City of South Lake Tahoe shall be declared a snow area with a Ground Snow Load of 150 Pounds Per Square Foot. This pertains to all structures, modular buildings, and factory- built houses. The building official may permit deviations from the snow loading standard, provided the snow load and conditions in each individual case are derived and certified by a registered civil or structural engineer with demonstrated experience in snow load evaluation.

S. Protection of Piping from Freezing. Add Section 312.13 to the California Plumbing Code as follows:
a. All water supply piping shall be protected from freezing by a minimum of 42 inches of earth covering.
b. All water piping shall be installed in such a manner to allow for the system to be drained.
c. Water piping shall not be installed or concealed in unheated walls, ceilings and attics.

T. Exhaust Vent Protection. Add Section 802.3.3.5 to the California Mechanical Code as follows:
a. Exhaust terminals and combustion air intakes shall not be located in areas in which could be sealed off around the perimeter with snow accumulation.

U. Electrical Installations. Add Article 80.13(a) and (b) to the California Electric Code as follows:
a. All electrical systems that are over 400 amps shall be designed by a California- licensed electrical engineer.
b. When changing out or adding a new electrical main panel, the subpanel, if so equipped, shall also be changed out to a breaker subpanel. No residential fuse panels will be allowed.
254
EV Charging Ordinance
Ordinance 2023-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
June 6, 2023
Ordinance Amending City Code Sections 6.15.160 to codify procedures for expediting permitting processing for electric vehicle charging systems

FINDINGS
A. The State of California and the City of South Lake Tahoe has consistently promoted and encouraged the use of fuel-efficient electric vehicles; and B. The State of California adopted Assembly Bill 1236, which requires local agencies to adopt an ordinance that creates an expedited and streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging systems; and C. Creation of an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations would facilitate convenient charging of electric vehicles and help reduce the City’s / County’s reliance on environmentally damaging fossil fuels.

Now, Therefore, the City Council of City of South Lake Tahoe does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1.

1. That the action taken on this matter and recommendations made after consideration of the whole administrative record are consistent with Government Code Section 65853 et seq.; and

2. That the proposed ordinance is exempt from environmental review per CEQA Guidelines under the General Rule (Section 15061(b)(3)), as the project involves updates and revisions to existing regulations. The proposed code amendments are consistent with California law, specifically Government Code section 65850.7. It can be seen with certainty that the proposed code amendments will have no significant effect on the environment, and are, therefore, not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).

SECTION 2. City Code Sections 6.15.160 is hereby amended to read as follows:
255
EV Charging Ordinance

6.15.160 Amendments, additions and deletions to the adopted codes.

A. California Building Code Section 105.5.1, California Residential Code Section R105.5.1, California Plumbing Code Section 104.4.3.1, California Mechanical Code Section 104.4.3.1 and California Electrical Code Article 89, 108.4.1 are hereby amended to read as follows:

Every permit issued by the building official under the provision of this code shall become invalid and expired unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within 12 months after its issuance, or if the work authorized on the site by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 12 months after the time the work is commenced. The Building Official is authorized to grant, in writing, one or more extensions of time, for periods not more than 180 days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. In order to renew action on an invalid permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee and be accompanied with updated construction documents to reflect compliance with the most recent applicable codes based on the new submittal date.

B. Any permittee holding an unexpired permit for a new structure or addition may apply for an extension of the time for which work may be completed under that permit when the permittee is unable to complete work within the time required by this section for good and satisfactory reasons. The building official may extend a permit for a period not exceeding 180 days on written request by the permittee. The written request shall be submitted to the building official prior to the expiration date of the original permit. The request for an extension of an existing permit shall show that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented completion of the work authorized by the permit. No permit may be extended more than three years cumulatively.

C. California Building Code Section 109.2, California Fire Code Section 106.2, California Residential Code Section R108.2., California Plumbing Code Section 104.5, California Mechanical Code Section 104.5 and California Electrical Code Article 80.19(H)(4) are hereby amended to read as follows:

The fee for each permit shall be as set forth in this section and by city council resolution. The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this code shall be made by the building official/fire code official. The value to be used in computing the building permit and building plan review fees shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems, and any other permanent equipment. Fees shall be determined by the valuation as shown for good construction 256
EV Charging Ordinance
on the valuation table as published annually in the
November/December issue of Building Standards magazine. Values shall be 100 percent of the valuation given in the basic valuation table.

Fees shall be adjusted on the first day of January each year. The fee shall be as specified through adoption of resolution by the city council.

EXCEPTION: Major projects for which the city contracts for inspection and/or plan review services shall be charged permit fees in accordance with the above section. Costs of additional plan review and/or overtime inspections required for project fast-tracking, or contractor scheduling, or due to changes in plans, shall be paid by the owner on a monthly basis. The fees shall be equal to the cost of service plus a 25 percent administrative fee.

The owner shall provide on-site office space for the resident inspector.

Such office space shall be private and under the exclusive control of the resident inspector. Electric power, heat and phone service shall be provided to the office. Such office shall be maintained on-site until the final certificate of occupancy is issued.

For work requiring a permit not described on the valuation table, the valuation shall be determined by contract price for the work, subject to review by the building official.

The minimum permit fee under this section shall be as specified through adoption of resolution by the city council. Additional plan review as a result of incomplete submittals or changes to plans after approval of such plans will be charged a plan review fee.

A reinspection fee shall be charged for scheduled inspections when the work, for which an inspection was requested, is not ready for inspection. A reinspection fee shall also apply to additional inspections after the initial inspection for verifying correction of items noted in a correction notice.

Special inspection fees shall be charged with a one-hour minimum charge. Any inspections requested outside of regular work hours will be charged a three-hour minimum charge.

D. California Building Code Section 115.4, California Fire Code Section 107.4, and California Residential Code Section R114.4 are hereby amended to read as follows:

When a stop work order is issued an investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The permit fee for work without a permit shall be 257
EV Charging Ordinance
twice the normal permit fee. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law.

E. International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) Section 107, Notices and Orders. Add the following text at the end of subsection 107.2, Item 4:

The maximum time limit shall be determined by the city building official based upon the condition of the structure and the potential hazard involved. Once such determination has been made, the building official shall serve a copy of a notice and order which specifies the dangerous condition to be remedied, together with the timeline for correction, as determined by the building official. Prior to the expiration date specified in the notice and order, the property owner shall perform either the rehabilitation, renovation or removal, as set forth in the notice and order.

Abatement of abandoned or substantially damaged non dwelling unit structures shall be subject to the provisions contained in Chapter 4.60 SLTCC.

F. Authority to Utilize Alternate Method of Recovery of Cost of Demolition. In any case where the city has found it necessary to undertake an abatement process to demolish a structure which has been found by the building official to be unsafe, as defined within Section 108 of the International Property Maintenance Code, the city may elect, at its discretion, to recover costs of such abatement using the methods prescribed in subsection (G) of this section as an alternative to the procedure outlined in Sections 110.3 and 109.4 et seq. of the aforementioned code.

G. Alternate Method of Recovery of Cost of Demolition.

1. Prior to commencement of any demolition activity undertaken as part of the abatement of an unsafe structure, the city shall take all necessary steps to ensure that all development rights which may be present on the parcel are appropriately banked with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and the South Tahoe Public Utility District. All such rights, which may include, but not be limited to, development rights, allocations, commercial square footage, hard and soft coverage rights, and sewer units, shall be banked to remain on the parcel upon which the demolition activity will be completed.

2. Upon completion of all demolition activities, an accounting of expenses shall be completed by the administrative services director and a public hearing to consider confirmation of the costs of the abatement shall be scheduled, noticed and conducted in accordance with Section 107 et seq. of the International Property Maintenance Code.
258
EV Charging Ordinance
The notice mailed to the owner of record for the property which is the subject of the abatement process shall contain a statement which substantively reads as follows:

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER
Development rights attributable to your property and recognized by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency have been banked with that agency. These rights have considerable value. In order to retain ownership of these development rights, you must pay any and all costs of the abatement process which may be confirmed by the City Council at the scheduled hearing no later than sixty-five (65) days following the date of said hearing.

Your failure to pay the confirmed costs of said abatement within sixtyfive (65) days of the date of the hearing will result in FORFEITURE

OF THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR
PROPERTY.

SUCH FORFEITURE MAY ULTIMATELY PROHIBIT YOU OR

ANYONE IN THE FUTURE FROM REDEVELOPING YOUR
PROPERTY.

3. Upon completion of the hearing process to confirm the costs of the abatement process, the owner of the property subject to the abatement shall have 65 days from the date of the hearing to pay all costs of the abatement which have been confirmed by the city council. In the event all costs are not paid within the specified time period, the city shall notify the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency of the city council’s confirmation of costs of the abatement process and the failure of the property owner to pay said costs, and shall request that the Tahoe regional planning agency approve forfeiture of all development rights banked to be vested with the city of South Lake Tahoe. Such forfeiture and vesting shall become effective 21 days after such approval is granted.

H. Expedited Permit Process for Photovoltaic and Electric Vehicle Charging Stationss. To California Building Code Section 107.3 the following subsection shall be added:

1. Definitions. As used in this section:

2. “Electronic submittal” means the utilization of one or more of the following:
a. Electronic mail or email
259
EV Charging Ordinance
b. The internet
“Electric vehicle charging station” or “charging station” means any level of electric vehicle supply equipment station that is designed and built in compliance with Article 625 of the California Electrical Code, as it reads on the effective date of this Chapter, and delivers electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a plug-in electric vehicle.” “Reasonable restrictions” on a solar energy system are those restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency or specified performance, or that allow for an alternative system of comparable cost, efficiency, and energy conservation benefits.
“Specific, adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

Restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency or specified performance” means:

For water heater systems or solar swimming pool heating systems: an amount exceeding ten (10) percent of the cost of the system, but in no case more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or decreasing the efficiency of the solar energy system by an amount exceeding ten (10) percent, as originally specified and proposed.

For photovoltaic systems: an amount not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) over the system cost as originally specified and proposed, or a decrease in system efficiency of an amount exceeding ten (10) percent as originally specified and proposed.
“Small residential rooftop solar energy system” means all of the following:
a. A solar energy system that is no larger than ten (10) kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating or thirty (30) kilowatts thermal. b. A solar energy system that conforms to all applicable State fire, structural, electrical, and other building codes as adopted or amended by the county and paragraph (iii) of subdivision (c) of Section 714 of the Civil Code, as such section or subdivision may be amended, renumbered, or designated from time to time. c. A solar energy system that is installed on a single- or duplex-family dwelling.
260
EV Charging Ordinance
d. A solar panel or module array that does not exceed the maximum legal building height as defined by the authority having jurisdiction. “Solar energy system” has the same meaning set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 801.5 of the Civil Code, as such section or subdivision may be amended, renumbered, or designated from time to time.
“Specific adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

2. Small Residential Rooftop Solar Systems
a. All solar energy systems shall meet applicable health and safety standards and requirements imposed by the state and the City of South Lake Tahoe.
b. All solar energy systems shall be certified by an accredited listing agency.
c. All energy systems for producing and or supplying electricity shall meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability.
d. Proof of approval by local utility must be presented with application.

3. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
a. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Chapter is to promote and encourage the use of electric vehicles by creating an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations while promoting public health and safety and preventing specific adverse impacts in the installation and use of such charging stations. This Chapter is also purposed to comply with California Government Code Section 65850.7. b. EXPEDITED PERMITTING PROCESS. Consistent with
Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall implement an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations, and adopt a checklist of all requirements with which electric vehicle charging stations shall comply with in order to be 261
EV Charging Ordinance
eligible for expedited review. The expedited, streamlined permitting process and checklist may refer to the recommendations contained in the most current version of the “Plug-In Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Permitting Checklist” of the “Zero-Emission Vehicles in California:

Community Readiness Guidebook” as published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. The City’s adopted checklist shall be published on the City’s website.
c. PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSING.
(i) Prior to submitting an application for processing, the applicant shall verify that the installation of an electric vehicle charging station will not have specific, adverse impact to public health and safety and building occupants. Verification by the applicant includes but is not limited to:
electrical system capacity and loads; electrical system wiring, bonding and overcurrent protection; building infrastructure affected by charging station equipment and associated conduits; areas of charging station equipment and vehicle parking.
(ii) A permit application that satisfies the information requirements in the City’s adopted checklist shall be deemed complete and be promptly processed. Upon confirmation by the Building Official that the permit application and supporting documents meets the requirements of the City adopted checklist, and is consistent with all applicable laws and health and safety standards, the Building Official shall, consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, approve the application and issue all necessary permits. Such approval does not authorize an applicant to energize or utilize the electric vehicle charging station until approval is granted by the City. If the Building Official determines that the permit application is incomplete, he or she shall issue a written correction notice to the applicant, detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance.
(iii) Consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall allow for electronic submittal of permit applications covered by this Ordinance and associated supporting documentations. In accepting such permit applications, the Building Official shall also accept electronic signatures on all forms, applications, and other documentation in lieu of a wet signature by any applicant. d. TECHNICAL REVIEW
(i) It is the intent of this Ordinance to encourage the installation of electric vehicle charging stations by removing obstacles to permitting for charging stations so long as the action does not supersede the Building 262
EV Charging Ordinance
Official’s authority to address higher priority life-safety situations. If the Building Official makes a finding based on substantial evidence that the electric vehicle charging station could have a specific adverse impact upon the public health or safety, as defined in this Chapter, the City may require the applicant to apply for a use permit.
(ii) In the technical review of a charging station, consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall not condition the approval for any electric vehicle charging station permit on the approval of such a system by an association, as that term is defined by Civil Code Section 4080.
e. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION INSTALLATION

REQUIREMENTS
(i) Electric vehicle charging station equipment shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code, the Society of Automotive Engineers, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories, and rules of the Public Utilities Commission or a Municipal Electric Utility Company regarding safety and reliability.
(ii) Installation of electric vehicle charging stations and associated wiring, bonding, disconnecting means and overcurrent protective devices shall meet the requirements of Article 625 and all applicable provisions of the California Electrical Code.
(iii) Installation of electric vehicle charging stations shall be incorporated into the load calculations of all new or existing electrical services and shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code. Electric vehicle charging equipment shall be considered a continuous load. (iv) Anchorage of either floor-mounted or wall-mounted electric vehicle charging stations shall meet the requirements of the California Building or Residential Code as applicable per occupancy, and the provisions of the manufacturer’s installation instructions. Mounting of charging stations shall not adversely affect building elements.

I. Fire Watch. California Fire Code Section 403.11.1, Fire Watch Personnel, is hereby amended to read as follows:

When, in the opinion of the fire code official, it is essential for public safety in a place of assembly or any other occupancy, because of the number of persons, or the nature of the noncompliance with the California Fire Code and/or the nature of the performance, exhibition, display, contest or activity, the fire code official may require the owner, 263
EV Charging Ordinance
agent or lessee, to provide one or more fire watch personnel to perform fire watch duties during the times such places are open to the public, or when such activity requiring a fire watch is being conducted.

J. Building Address. Section 502.1 of the California Building Code, California Fire Code Section 505.1 and Section R319.1 of the California Residential Code are hereby amended to read as follows:

Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided for all new buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Address numbers and internal illumination shall be maintained. The addresses for new dwellings shall be posted with a minimum of four inch (4") high numbers with proportionate width that are plainly visible from the street. During hours of darkness, the numbers shall be internally illuminated. Posted numbers shall be placed on a contrasting background. Where building setbacks exceed one hundred feet (100') from the street or road fronting the property, additional contrasting six inch (6") high numbers shall be displayed at the property entrance. The addresses for new multi-family, new commercial and new industrial buildings shall be posted with a minimum of six-inch (6") high by three-quarters inch (3/4") stroke numbers. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically illuminated. New multi-family, new commercial and new industrial buildings shall display address/suite numbers or letters sixinch (6") high by three-quarters inch (3/4") stroke placed on a contrasting background on the front and rear doors of each suite/unit.

K. Fire Access Grade. California Fire Code Section 503.2.7 is hereby amended to read as follows:
503.2.7 Grade. The grade of the fire apparatus access road shall be within the limits established by the fire code official based on the fire department’s apparatus. Where driveways serving one- and twofamily dwelling units have a driveway gradient exceeding eight percent (8%), a separate emergency egress path of travel from the primary entrance of each dwelling unit to the public way shall be provided. All components of the separate emergency egress path of travel shall comply with all applicable provisions of the California Building Code.

L. Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI). California Building Code Chapter 7A, California Fire Code Chapter 49 and California Residential Code Section R337 are adopted in their entirety with the amendments to read as follows:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE IS DESIGNATED AS VERY-HIGH
FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE. For purposes of clarification and enforcement of the following shall be added to each chapter preface:
264
EV Charging Ordinance
The City of South Lake Tahoe has adopted Ordinance 2019-1131 which designates all areas within the City of South Lake Tahoe a Very High Fire Severity Zone.

M. Freeze Protection. California Building Code and California Fire Code Section 903 are hereby added to the California Building Code and the California Fire Code to read as follows:

All sprinkler systems shall be suitably freeze-protected for climatic conditions as prescribed by the fire code official.

N. Roof Fire Rating. California Building Code Section 1505.1.1 and California Residential Code Section R902.1.1 are written here for emphasis and clarity:

The entire roof covering of every existing structure where more than 50 percent of the total roof area is replaced within any one-year period, the entire roof covering of every new structure, and any roof covering applied in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof of every existing structure, shall be a fire-retardant roof covering that is at least Class A.

O. Snowshed Impact Areas. Add to California Building Code Section 1608.1 and to California Residential Code Section R301.2.3:

Snow shed Impact Areas Protection of Required Entries/Exits, Parking, and Driveways.

1. Roof surfaces and photovoltaic panels that are susceptible to rooftop avalanche risk shall be designed so that snow shed impact areas will not occur in or on entries/exits (required exits only for R-3 occupancies), vehicle parking areas, driveways, LPG storage tanks, gas meters, electrical meters, walkways, and public ways.

2. The minimum snow shed impact area shall have a setback of ten feet measured horizontally from a vertical line projecting from the roof eave to the other constructed elements such as fences, sheds, and patio covers.

3. The snow shed impact area may be eliminated provided an engineered snow restraint system, designed in accordance with this code, is incorporated into the roof design and, in other than R-3 occupancies, an approved roof drainage system (e.g., heated gutter and downspout) is installed to prevent ice formation/accumulation at the grade or access level.

4. Property owners shall maintain snow shed impact areas to prevent snow from encroaching beyond the impact area boundaries. 265
EV Charging Ordinance

5. Existing structures may use engineered snow slide restraint devices without an approved roof drainage system to reduce hazards associated with the existing roof design.

P. Ice Dam Membrane. Add Section 1507.1.2 to the California Building Code and Section R9045.1.2 to the California Residential Code as follows:

Title 15-10: An “Ice Guard” is required on roofs of heated areas of buildings. Roofs, regardless of covering, with a pitch of less than 8 in 12 shall be protected against leakage (caused by ice and snow) using an approved manufactured membrane installed per the manufacturer’s specifications and as approved by the building official. This application shall extend from the eave edge of the roof up the roof slope measured 5 feet beyond the wall line separating the conditioned and unconditioned space, and up 30 inches along each side of a valley.

This “Ice Guard” shall be in addition to any other required underlayment.

Q. Local Design Criteria. Amend California Building Code Section 1603 and California Residential Code Table R301.2, Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria, by adding the following design criteria values as listed below in items 1 through 8 to read as follows:

1. Ground Snow Load: 150 PSF

2. Wind Design Speed: (Based on the ASCE 7-10 code cycle) Risk Category 1: 110 mph
Risk Category 2: 120 mph
Risk Category 3: 130 mph
Risk Category 4: 130 mph

3. Seismic Design Category: D

4. Subject to Weathering from Weathering: Negligible

5. Frost Line Depth: 18 inches

6. Termites: Yes

7. Climate Zone: 16

8. Ice Barrier Underlayment Required: Yes
R. Snow Loads. Add Section 1608.4 to the California Building Code and Section R301.2.3.1 to the California Residential Code as follows:

All of the City of South Lake Tahoe shall be declared a snow area with a Ground Snow Load of 150 Pounds Per Square Foot. This pertains to all structures, modular buildings, and factory-built houses. The building official may permit deviations from the snow loading standard, provided the snow load and conditions in each individual case are derived and certified by a registered civil or structural engineer with demonstrated experience in snow load evaluation.
266
EV Charging Ordinance
S. Protection of Piping from Freezing. Add Section 312.13 to the California Plumbing Code as follows:
a. All water supply piping shall be protected from freezing by a minimum of 42 inches of earth covering.
b. All water piping shall be installed in such a manner to allow for the system to be drained.
c. Water piping shall not be installed or concealed in unheated walls, ceilings and attics.

T. Exhaust Vent Protection. Add Section 802.3.3.5 to the California Mechanical Code as follows:
a. Exhaust terminals and combustion air intakes shall not be located in areas in which could be sealed off around the perimeter with snow accumulation.

U. Electrical Installations. Add Article 80.13(a) and (b) to the California Electric Code as follows:
a. All electrical systems that are over 400 amps shall be designed by a California-licensed electrical engineer.
b. When changing out or adding a new electrical main panel, the subpanel, if so equipped, shall also be changed out to a breaker subpanel. No residential fuse panels will be allowed.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on June 6, 2023 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.

First Reading: May 16, 2023
267
EV Charging Ordinance
Published:

Second Reading: June 6, 2023
Effective:
268
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 13
Agenda Item: Public Works Department Annual Report 2022 Executive Summary: Public Works Department has completed our second Annual Report for 2022.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive and File.

Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works (530) 542-6031 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Annual Report
02-PW Annual Report 2022- Final.pdf
269
Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Public Works Department Annual Report 2022
Location: Public Works
Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works – (530) 542-6031 Background: This is the second annual report prepared by the Public Works Department, summarizing the Department’s accomplishments in 2022.

Issue and Discussion: The Public Works Department has managed several major design and construction projects. Staff was stretched with the epic snowstorms during the Winter of 2023. The Department hired a new Airport Manager and made significant changes to the Airport operations.

A significant number of departmental goals were accomplished, outlined in the attached 2022 Annual Report.

Financial Implications: None
Environmental Considerations: Not a project. This is an annual report which is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEA) under CEQ Guiles section 15378 (b) (2) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

Policy Implications: This report serves as a benchmark for future annual activities and goals. 270
Annual Report 2022

PUBLIC WORKS
271
Public Works Department
Annual Report 2022
AdministraƟon
Fleet Services
FaciliƟes Maintenance
Streets/Snow Maintenance
Stormwater
Airport
Capital Improvement Program
Engineering
272
The Public Works Department core services consist of
several Divisions: AdministraƟon, Engineering, Storm
Water Management, FaciliƟes, Streets/Snow, Fleet  Services and Airport.

These operaƟng divisions provide core services in support of the City’s strategic iniƟaƟves, including: capital project implementaƟon, storm water management,
compliance with municipal storm water discharge
permit, roadway maintenance, snow removal, road
rehabilitaƟon, maintenance of faciliƟes, preservaƟon of City faciliƟes, provision of safe public spaces, and fleet services supporƟng City operaƟons. These services support other Departments, including Police, Fire, Parks and RecreaƟon and Airport.

The Public Works Department is funded through mulƟple funding sources including the General Fund, Gas Taxes, State and Federal Grants, Assessment Districts, Permits and InspecƟon fee revenues.  Grant funding over the last several years has helped to offset costs and reduce the Department’s general fund budget.  While grants have significantly helped offset the cost of implemenƟng priority capital improvement projects, the Public Works Department is also focused on determining asset maintenance needs and evaluaƟng funding opƟons for infrastructure repair as a strategic priority.

Mission and Responsibilities
273
2022‐23 Org Chart
PW Director
Anush Nejad
Office
Manager
A. Burnam
Capital &
Facilities Mgr.

J. Marino
Complete Streets
Program Mgr.

J. Burke
GIS Analyst
R. Malhoski
Eng. Tech
E. Dougherty
Airport
Manger
J. Dickinson
Airport Sup.

M. Jevic
MT III
M. Cansino
Eng.

Manager
S. Hill
As s oc. Eng.

R. Ca rls on
RE/RI
M. Fri sina
Fleet
Manager
P. Harwood
Fleet Control
Specialist
G. Fisk
Equipment
Mech. III
G. Givens
Equipment
Mechanic II
(3)
Equipment
Mechanic I
(1)
Facilities
Manager
T. Shindelbower
MT Lead
D. Churchill
MT IV
(2)
MT III
(1)
MT II
(1)
MT II Temp
(1)
Streets/Snow
Manager
J. Heath
MT Lead
L. Olmedo
MT V (2)
MT IV (7)
1 EE 50/50
P&R
MT III  (5)
2 EEs 50/50
P&R
Snow
Removal
Seasonals
274
Public Works AdministraƟon
Supports all Divisions within the Public
Works Department and is usually the
first contact with ciƟzens. In 2022, PW
AdministraƟon received 841 service requests through the asset management program.

PW AdministraƟon is also accountable
for fiscal oversight including budget
preparaƟon, franchise agreements, procurement, clerical support, human resources requirements, regulaƟon of CFR 49 for employees with Commercial Driver’s License, DMV Pull NoƟce Program, Random Alcohol Drug TesƟng Program
and liaison to other agencies, joint powers, coaliƟons, advisory commiƩees, and task forces.

Administration Anush Nejad
275
Fleet Services—Phil Harwood
Phil Harwood is the
Maintenance Manager responsible for the Fleet
Services.

Fleet Services recorded
7,458 hours maintaining
372 vehicles and pieces of
equipment. Two fuel sites
are in operaƟon and
93,885 gallons of gas were
dispensed for city vehicle
usage.

Fourteen (14) new vehicles were purchased and
received into the City’s
fleet in 2022 for a total
cost of $884,061.
276
Fleet Services—Phil Harwood
277
In 2012, the City of South Lake Tahoe, Fleet Services earned the Blue Seal of Excellence from the NaƟonal InsƟtute for AutomoƟve Service Excellence and has maintained the award for 11 years.

Fleet Services
278
Travis Shindelbower is the
Maintenance Manager responsible for the FaciliƟes Maintenance.

The FaciliƟesMaintenance OperaƟons performs a variety of maintenance services to repair,
replace, develop, and maintain
along with management of contractors and services for the City’s various faciliƟes and assets, including city buildings, Airport, walkway and parking lot lighƟng,
underground pumps at Colorado
Court and other infrastructure.

The Division maintains 51 separate properƟes for a total 472,209 square feet citywide.

The FaciliƟes team receive requests for moving furniture to minor repairs to major repairs.

Facilities Maintenance—Travis Shindelbower
279
Facilities Maintenance
Throughout 2022 many projects were completed on City faciliƟes:
 Replace water heaters at Ice Arena, Fire StaƟon 1, Fire StaƟon 2, Police Department , Airport and Senior Center
 ConƟnued roof repairs at Ice Arena, Services Center, Police Department and RecreaƟon Center  Install ice machines in three fire staƟons
 Install boƩle fill staƟons at PD, Parking Garage Office and Services Center  Installed new heat tape at Ice Arena, PD, Senior Center, Scout Lodge and Rec Center  Replaced heaters at FS 2,  Tahoe TransportaƟon District Shop and Motor Pool  Installed smart thermostats in various locaƟons to beƩer manage energy tracking  Updates and repairs on boiler systems at Explore Tahoe, PD, Parking Garage and Rec Center
 ConƟnued lighƟng updates at Motor Pool, PD, FS 1, Ice Arena, Parking Garage and others.
280
Facilities Maintenance
 Repaired failed downspout at
Rec Center
 Updated lighƟng in pool area to
conƟnue evening acƟviƟes
 Repaired dehumidifier fan and
ducƟng at Ice Arena
 Performed repairs on Zamboni
charger
 Service and repair Ice Arena Fire
suppression system
 Oversaw mold asbestos abatement at Tahoe District and Motor Pool building
 Installed car charger at PD
 Resolve gas issues at PD
 Replaced failed kitchen cabinets at FS 2
 Work with contractor to replace failing
service leads at Motor Pool
 InsulaƟon at TTD facility with spray foam
 Installed temporary power for Parks
Shop and Campground Gatehouse
 Replaced sub panel at Rufus Corp Yard
 GraffiƟ removal, securing of properƟes
for PD
 Repair and maintain Riverside bollards
281
Facilities Maintenance
 Replaced failed backflow protectors at Rufus
Corp Yard wash bay and Rec Center
 Helped orchestrate Dark Sky survey
 Sister city plaque installed at Lakeview Commons
 Assist Airport, Parks, Streets and Fleet Services in maintenance operaƟons  Build and distribute auxiliary air filters during wildfire events  ParƟcipate in facility and ADA assessment
process
282
Facilities Maintenance
All Hands on for Snow Removal
Facility Maintenance Employees help in snow removal operaƟons. This year was a monumental snow year, keeping the facility workers in plow routes and loaders where and when needed. 283
Street Maintenance—Jerry Heath
Jerry Heath is the Maintenance
Manager responsible for the
Streets and Snow OperaƟons.

Street Maintenance provides
maintenance for 259 lane miles
of road, maintains over 7,700
signs and post markers, inspects
cleans and maintains 2,000+
drainage inlets, vaults, infiltraƟon
basins and pipes.

In 2022, the enƟre city was swept twice,
some streets more during the winter sanding
routes. Seven new drywells were installed. All
traffic markings were painted, including 3 new
pride crosswalks and linear bike path. Nine
thousand pounds of cold mix was purchased
and applied. Crews also used hot asphalt to
patch 10,777 square feet of pavement. Installed 40’ of 18” drainpipe on Werner Salas.

A 74’ trench was dug at Rufus Allen and 314’
wire installed, along with a new electrical
panel. Two flashing stop signs at Ski Run and
Tamarack were installed, and two at Linear
Bike Path, 7,700 Signs maintained, cleaned
and inspected 2,000+ drain inlets and pipes.
284
The City of South Lake Tahoe Council recognized
Pride Month and voted to
paint certain sidewalks
with pride recogniƟon
colors.

The total number
staff hours for
snow removal in
2022 was 3,672.

Street Maintenance
285
Stormwater Management
Jason Burke was responsible for citywide Stormwater compliance program in 2022.

The City completed a systemaƟc inventory and assessment of underground storm drain pipes. This effort will help develop a long-term repair and replacement plan for replacing aging or failing underground storm drain pipes and develop a finance and management strategy. Staff coordinates with paving projects to replace aging pipe prior to the paving work, consistent with the City’s “Dig Once” approach to road rehabilitaƟon. 286
The Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requires that the City achieve specific reducƟons of nutrients and fine sediment parƟcles in urban runoff to restore and protect the clarity of Lake Tahoe. The City is on track to comply with our obligaƟons to demonstrate compliance with the required sediment and nutrient load reducƟons, as shown in the Lake Clarity CrediƟng Program, requiring the City to secure at least 521 credits through modelling and field inspecƟons to verify effecƟveness of street sweeping and constructed stormwater treatment systems are removing sediment from stormwater runoff.

Stormwater Management—Jason Burke
287
Airport—John Dickinson
 Airport completed phase one of the Hangar Lane Repairs, which helped keep a revenue stream without delay.
 Worked with Calfire on fuels management, this will help saƟsfy the FAA and Caltrans needs  Working with JviaƟon on Large Hangar Build, this process will help generate more revenue.
 Awarded contract for BLM fuels project, looking to begin fuels reducƟon this year.
 New Rate and Charges completed in October and November 2022, this helped to eliminate the general fund subsidy.  New equipment was bought to help with snow removal at the airport, included a MulƟ Hog and John Deer Front Loader. 288
Airport
 New Airport Manager Hire, John Dickinson.
 Pavement Maintenance Management Plan
(PMMP) Grant 47 awarded to JviaƟon, this is
required for future pavement projects.
289
Capital improvement programming is a guide toward the efficient and effecƟve delivery of public faciliƟes, systems, and infrastructure.  Programming capital projects over Ɵme can promote beƩer use of the City’s limited financial resources and assist in the coordinaƟon of public and private development.  In addiƟon, the programming process is valuable as a means of coordinaƟng and taking advantage of joint planning and development of projects where possible.

By looking beyond year-to-year budgeƟng and projecƟng what, where, when, and how capital investments should be made, capital programming enables the city to maintain an effecƟve level of service for both the present and future populaƟon.

Capital Improvement Program—Jim Marino
290
Most oŌen, projects are forwarded to the team by a sponsoring department or division. Being aware that there are always more project proposals submiƩed than can be funded within the annual budget, the CIP Development team conducts a project ranking process. While project rankings are important in determining recommended prioriƟes, the realiƟes of the City’s financial situaƟon are criƟcal to all decisions. All projects are scored numerically for a total score. The total score then is mulƟplied by a risk analysis score which provides the final project ranking occur.

Scoring Criteria:

Strategic PrioriƟes
 Built Environment
 RecreaƟon and Equitable Access
 Community for All
 Economic Development
 ConƟnuous Improvement
Program Criteria
 CriƟcal Replacement
 Health and Safety
 General and Area Plan Impact
 Regulatory Compliance
 Sustainability
Return on Investment Criteria
 Visual Impact
 Savings to OperaƟng Costs
 Direct Revenue GeneraƟon
 Indirect Revenue GeneraƟon
 Cost Avoidance
Risk Analysis
 Risk impact of failure
Capital Project Ranking and Prioritization
291
FY 21‐22 Projects In Phase
FY 21‐22 Completed Projects
Project Program Area FuncƟonal Area
2021 Roadway RehabilitaƟon TransportaƟon, Bike/Ped Streets/Roads/Walks/Trails Lakeview Commons Beach Replenishment Infrastructure and Facility Parks/Greenbelts/Grounds Purchase Roadway Striping Vehicle Asset Management & Replacement Vehicles and Equipment Purchase Kodiak Snowblower Asst Management & Replacement Vehicles and Equipment 56 Acres Master Plan Infrastructure and Facility Parks/Greenbelts/Grounds Airport Apron ReconstrucƟon
Phase VI
Infrastructure and Facility Airport/AviaƟon
Bijou WQ Project Phase 1 Infrastructure and Facility Storm Water/NPDES Project Program Area FuncƟonal Area
RecreaƟon Center Infrastructure and Facility FaciliƟes/Buildings Al Tahoe Cemetery Security ImprovementsInfrastructure and Facility Parks/Greenbelts/Grounds Skatepark Maintenance Improvements Phase 2Infrastructure and Facility Parks/Greenbelts/Grounds 2023 Roadway RehabilitaƟon TransportaƟon, Bike/Ped Streets/Roads/Walks/Trails Fire StaƟon III RenovaƟons Infrastructure and Facility FaciliƟes/Buildings Lake Tahoe Boulevard Bike and
Pedestrian Trail
TransportaƟon, Bike/Ped Streets/Roads/Walks/Trails
Dark Sky LighƟng – Phase 1 Infrastructure and Facility Streets/Roads/Walks/Trails Bijou Park Bike Trail TransportaƟon, Bike/Ped Streets/Roads/Walks/Trails FaciliƟes CondiƟon Assessments Infrastructure and Facility FaciliƟes/Buildings Dennis Machida Mem. Bike
Trail—1C
TransportaƟon, Bike/Ped Streets/Roads/Walks/Trails
Taxi Lane Rehab Infrastructure and Facility Airport/AviaƟon Barton & 2nd Street Drainage
Project
Stormwater/NPDES/MS4 Water Quality
Tahoe Valley Stormwater &
Greenbelt Improvement Project
Stormwater/NPDES/MS4 Water Quality
James & Eloise Drainage Project Stormwater/NPDES/MS4 Water Quality Upper Bijou Creek Watershed
RestoraƟon Project
Stormwater/NPDES/MS4 Water Quality
Ruby Way/Overlook Ct Erosion
Control Project
Stormwater/NPDES/MS4 Water Quality
Stormwater Infrastructure Replacement Stormwater/NPDES/MS4 Water Qualit 292
Stan Hill is the Engineering Manager for Public Works Department. Engineering Department is responsible for implementaƟon of Capital Improvement Program and applying for grant funds.

The following are some of accomplishments of the Engineering Department in 2022. 2022 Road RehabilitaƟon
The 2022 Road RehabilitaƟon
Project included pavement resurfacing of Tahoe Keys Blvd, 15th Street (between Emerald
Bay Road and Venice Drive),
Washington Ave, and Third
Street (between Washington Ave
and Lake Tahoe Blvd).  Project
work included replacement or
reinforcement of exisƟng storm
drain culverts, reseƫng manholes to grade, and new pavement striping.

Engineering—Stan Hill
Reseƫng sanitary sewer manhole rim and cover to
new pavement grade and construcƟng new concrete
collar on 15th Street.
293
Engineering
 Lake Tahoe Blvd Class 1 Bike Trail
ConstrucƟon of the Lake Tahoe Blvd Class 1 Bike Trail included construcƟon of new curbs, guƩers, and commercial driveways.  Project improvements were constructed in compliance with ADA standards which included new pedestrian ramps at all public street intersecƟons. City standard bike trail streetlights are scheduled for installaƟon the spring of 2023. Project close-out will occur following installaƟon of the streetlights.  The new Lake Tahoe Blvd Class 1 bike trail extends from Viking Road/D Street to the South Y Transit Center.

ConstrucƟon of curb, guƩer and pedestrian
ramps
New concrete commercial driveway entry in
foreground and recently paved Class 1 mixed
use bike trail in background
294
Engineering
Tree cuƫng in progress at Bonanza Basin site
Late 2022 construcƟon start of Tahoe
Valley, Phase 1 included removal of
trees to make way for proposed water
quality treatment basins.  Photos show
fallen trees at leŌ that were chipped for
later use and stumps that will be hauled
out of the Tahoe Basin or ground up for
later use during surface revegetaƟon
work.

Stump removal complete at future Bonanza Basin
Proposed Tahoe Valley, Phase 1 construcƟon work includes construcƟon of stormwater collecƟon (drainage inlets), conveyance (storm drain pipe), and water quality treatment (basins).

Phase 1 construcƟon is scheduled for
compleƟon in 2023. Super-wet condiƟons following the 2022-2023 winter may result in a mid-summer 2024
compleƟon date.
295
Engineering: Grants Received
Caltrans STBG LT Bike Trail   $   473,000
Caltrans ATP Pioneer Trail Ped Improv $1,200,000
Caltrans STBG Pioneer Trail Ped Improv $   420,000
Caltrans  CMAQ Pioneer TR. Ped Improv PH II $   300,000 Caltrans HIP Pioneer Trail Ped Improv PH II $   111,000 Caltrans STBG Pioneer Trail Ped Improv PH II $   606,000 Caltrans CMAQ Pioneer Trail Ped Improv. PH II $1,468,000 Caltrans  HSIPL (ZS30) Pioneer Trail Edna St. Upgrades $     49,500 Caltrans HSIPL Pioneer Trail Edna St. Upgrades $  103,590 CA. Tahoe Conversancy Bijou Park Creek RestoraƟon $  511,000 CA  Tahoe Conversancy Tahoe Valley Greenbelt $  375,000 CA Tahoe Conversancy Tahoe Valley Greenbelt $  725,000
CA. Tahoe Conversancy Tahoe Valley Greenbelt $  550,000 State Water Resource Tahoe Valley Greenbelt $6,922,904
State CA HCD    Bijou Connector Trail $   977,000
USFS LT Basin Mngt Unit Bijou Park Creek RestoraƟon $ 1,750,000 CA Natural Resources 2nd Street Stormwater $1,289,822
TOTAL $18,127,591
296
Engineering: Grants Received and Closed in
FY 20/21
Caltrans CMAQ Lake Tahoe Bike Trail PE $  203,000
Caltrans STBG Lake Tahoe Bike Trail ROW $  249,000
Caltrans ATP Lake Tahoe Bike Trail CON $  744,000
Caltrans HIP Lake Tahoe Bike Trail CON $  756,000
Caltrans CMAQ Lake Tahoe Bike Trail CON $  268,775
Caltrans STBG   Lake Tahoe Bike Trail CON $1,000,000
TOTAL $3,220,775
297
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Agenda Item #: 14
Agenda Item: Tahoe Valley Area Plan: 2023 Amendments
Executive Summary: The City of South Lake Tahoe is in the process of amending the Tahoe Valley Area Plan. The purpose of the amendments ranges from general improvements and a need for greater consistency with recently amended TRPA regulations, state regulations, and City goals, to increasing housing opportunities and activating town centers. Staff shall present areas under consideration for changes to the City Council and receive comments from councilmembers and the public.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive a Presentation, hold a discussion, and provide feedback on the amendments under consideration for the Tahoe Valley Area Plan.

Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner Reviewed and Approved By:

Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - TVAP Amendments.docx
02 - Presentation.pptx
03 - Tahoe Valley Area Plan.pdf
04 - TVAP Stakeholder Feedback.docx
05 - PC Meeting Feedback 2023-02-23.docx
06 - TVAP Project Description.docx
298
City Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 1 of 8
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 16, 2023
Title: Tahoe Valley Area Plan: 2023 Updates
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner Background:

The purpose of an Area Plan is to provide local governments an opportunity to consolidate and simplify regulations, eliminate regulatory inconsistencies between the Regional Plan and local plans, and increase redevelopment and property investment incentives to revitalize the Region’s aging commercial centers and infrastructure. The City of South Lake Tahoe currently has two adopted area plans, the Tourist Core Area Plan (TCAP) and the Tahoe Valley Area Plan (TVAP), both of which are due for amendments to bring the plans up to date with the City’s current strategic goals, new state laws, and TRPA Regional Plan goals.

The Tahoe Valley area developed as a commercial corridor serving travelers along Highway 50.

Today it is a town center that provides amenities, employment opportunities, and entertainment for residents; however, the area has been transformed and redeveloped at a slower rate than the midtown and tourist core areas of South Lake Tahoe. Direction for growth and redevelopment is guided by the Tahoe Valley Area Plan (Attachment 3) as adopted by City Council on June 2, 2015. The plan establishes land use guidance, policy framework, and implementation strategies to create physical, social, and economic links to improve the Tahoe Valley area and create a sustainable community.

The existing districts of the area plan are shown in Image 1, below. Each district has a land use vision that contributes to the overall goal and vision of the area plan. All districts of the area plan except the Commercial Mixed-Use Services District are included in the TRPA Town Center Overlay, as indicated by the blue outline. Five (5) parcels at the northeastern end of the Town Center Mixed-Use Corridor are also excluded from the Town Center Overlay and are identified by TRPA as a Stream Restoration Plan Area.
299
City Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 2 of 8
Public Engagement
On February 1, 2023, staff held a stakeholder workshop for the TVAP amendments. The goals and concepts for the changes were presented, and staff received feedback from participants that would inform and direct the amendments moving forward. Feedback from this workshop is included in Attachment 4. Participants included local business and property owners, housing advocates, public agencies, non-profit groups, and design professionals.

After incorporating stakeholder feedback and furthering the amendment concepts, a public workshop was held at the February 23, 2023, Planning Commission meeting. Here staff received feedback from commissioners and the public. Notes from this meeting are included in Attachment 5. Due to the extensive similarities between the amendments proposed for the TVAP and TCAP, these notes were consolidated into one document.

Image 1: Current boundary of the Tahoe Valley Area Plan 300
City Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 3 of 8
The City Council will receive a presentation (Attachment 2), hold a discussion, and provide feedback on the amendments under consideration.

Issue and Discussion:

City staff has successfully implemented policies and standards of the area plan since its adoption; however, the plan requires updates to reflect current City goals, increase consistency with recently amended TRPA regulations and state regulations, and generally improve the design and development standards. These amendments are an opportunity to achieve goals in three main categories, which staff has identified as priority areas: increasing housing opportunities, activating town centers, and increasing transportation and circulation opportunities. Below is a description of changes under consideration in these three categories, while the full project description (Attachment 06) covers a broader list of amendments in greater detail.

Housing Opportunities: To increase and incentivise housing opportunities, changes to density standards and unit size eligibility criteria are being considered. The current maximum multifamily residential density is 25 units per acre. This applies to all districts where multi-family dwellings are allowed, which includes all districts except Open Space. Staff is exploring increasing this to 65 units per acre for districts in the town center, as well as establishing a minimum density of 8 units per acre to prevent underutilization of land in and around town centers. The minimum density standard would apply to purely residential projects in all districts.

Staff is also analysing residential use definitions and locations where multi-family, multi-person, and employee housing uses are permissible to create consistency between residential uses that are functionally the same.

To promote affordability by design, the amendments will consider establishing a maximum unit size for projects that utilize policy and development incentives established by the City and TRPA and will incorporate recent changes to City Code establishing standards for accessory dwelling units. The City Council is also discussing the potential for an inclusionary housing requirement which has potential to create affordable housing units.

It is important to note that TRPA is working with the Tahoe Living Working Group on revising regional height, density and coverage standards throughout the region with a goal of reducing barriers to developing housing for local residents. These TRPA amendments are currently projected to be completed by the end of 2023 and City staff is participating in this process to ensure consistency with locally developed housing strategies and land use policies that have been discussed in local engagement efforts. Recent changes to City Code establishing standards for accessory dwelling units will also be included as an additional affordable by design housing option.

As part of the amendments, staff wish to address inconsistencies in TRPA permit requirements for affordable and market-rate housing developments. Currently, affordable housing projects 301
City Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 4 of 8
require a higher level of decision-maker consideration than market-rate housing projects, which is inconsistent with California state law and City goals of a streamlined permitting process.

Activating Town Centers: To activate the area plan town centers, staff is considering ways to reduce barriers to operating appropriate outdoor dining and evaluating allowable uses for consistency with the goals of each area plan and historical uses in the area.

Transportation and Circulation Opportunities: Another focus of the TVAP amendments is to increase transportation opportunities to, from, and within the plan area. Since adoption, several of the transportation improvement projects identified in the TVAP have been completed or are well underway. The amendments will include updating the implementation actions to reflect new priorities to improve connectivity and access to transit. City staff is also exploring options to allow development projects to have a reduced onsite parking requirement in exchange for contributions to the implementation of connectivity and transit initiatives.

TVAP boundary changes: In addition to the changes noted above, boundary and zoning changes to the area plan are being explored in the following areas:
 In accordance with TVAP Policy H1.9, the City is exploring the addition of a new district that prioritizes higher-density housing. Staff has identified 19 parcels to be included in this district, located south of the existing area plan along Emerald Bay Road. This district is not eligible to be included in the Town Center. Staff is considering a maximum density of 25 units per acre and a minimum density of 8 units per acre for this district. 302
City Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 5 of 8
 Seven (7) parcels adjacent to the existing Town Center Gateway District are being considered for incorporation into this district. These properties have been identified as having high redevelopment potential and could greatly benefit from the incentives offered to parcels within area plans.
303
City Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 6 of 8
 In processing a zoning amendment application, staff has analysed 15 parcels east of Tahoe Keys Blvd and north of the Town Center Mixed Use Corridor District. Many of these parcels contain legal but nonconforming uses or densities. The characteristics of this area are in line with that of the Town Center Neighbourhood Professional District, and staff is considering expanding this district to include these parcels.

Financial Implications:

There are no financial implications associated with City Council receiving this presentation.

Environmental Considerations:

The action of receiving a presentation is exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3). The activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA 304
City Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 7 of 8
applies only to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment.

Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Policy Implications:

General Plan
Updating the City’s area plans is consistent with General Plan Goal LU
2, to focus future commercial, multi
family residential, tourist, civic, and social gathering space development in community plan areas in order to maximize incentives and create transit
, bicycle
, and pedestrian-oriented places that serve the needs of both residents and visitors. Policies under this General Plan goal that are specific to the TVAP include:

Policy LU-2.2: The City shall periodically update and implement the four Community Plans as a way to focus development commodities and revitalization efforts.

Policy LU-2.7: The City shall transform the Tahoe Valley area into an attractive gateway commercial district that serves both residents and visitors.

Policy LU-2.9: The City shall define two Nodes, one at the Tahoe Valley Y Intersection and the other at Stateline and make them a focus of future development and revitalization efforts in the City. To this end, the City shall work with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency to encourage allocations of development commodities (e.g., Commercial Floor Area, Residential Units of Use) to these areas.

Policy LU-2.10: The City, in coordination with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, shall encourage compact, mixed‐use, transit‐oriented, and higher‐density development within the Stateline Node and Tahoe Valley Gateway District by providing the maximum incentives for these types of projects. Incentives should include an increase in allowed coverage, increased commercial floor area allocations, financing opportunities available through Redevelopment Plans, and exemptions from coverage limitations for affordable and moderate-income housing.

Policy LU-2.11: The City shall ensure that the Tahoe Valley Gateway District will be a primary area in the City for resident‐serving commercial uses, workforce housing (e.g., housing affordable to local workers in all industries), and affordable housing. The City should work with property owners to transform the Node into a contemporary, pedestrian‐oriented, mixed‐use, commercial service district served by a transit center and alternate transportation opportunities.

Policy LU-2.13: The City shall create active and inviting social and economic centers in the two Nodes that include a variety of housing types, mixed‐use development, recreational or social gathering spaces, cultural uses, civic uses and facilities, and commercial services.

The amendments are also consistent with Land Use Policy LU-1.2 to create walkable, mixeduse centers that provide a range of housing opportunities and choices. 305
City Council Agenda Report May 16, 2023 Page 8 of 8
Tahoe Valley Area Plan
While the amendments are consistent with all policies within the Tahoe Valley Area Plan, the following were specifically identified in guiding the amendments.

Policy LU-1.1 – Active Streets: Animate streets by allowing uses such as retail, entertainment, special events, outdoor dining and seating, oriented towards the sidewalk.

Policy LU-1.5 – Auto-Oriented Commercial Use Consolidation: Encourage the consolidation of existing auto-oriented commercial development into pedestrian-oriented development.

Policy LU-3.2 – Architectural Style: Require the use of “mountain” architectural theme in new development and through remodeling. Mountain architecture features the use of pitched roofs, natural colors, and natural materials such as rock and wood.

Policy H-1.9 – Housing Needs: Encourage the consolidation of parcels within the Tahoe Valley area or the incorporation of parcels adjacent to the Area Plan boundaries for the development of multi-residential units.
306

TAHOE VALLEY AREA PLAN
2023 AMENDMENTS

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 16, 2023
307

WHAT ARE AREA PLANS
 Comprehensive land use planning documents which
provide specific development objectives and standards
for a specified area which address:
 Allows for planning with greater flexibility at a
community scale
 Provides a framework for an increase in redevelopment and property investment
 Creates a central permitting mechanism with TRPA
regulation
 Land Use Regulations
 Development and Design Standards
 Environmental Improvements
 Transportation
 Recreation
 Public Services
308

TAHOE VALLEY AREA PLAN
 Adopted in 2015
 2021 TRPA Ordinance Amendment to the TVAP related
to the Sugar Pine Village affordable housing project
 Coverage transfer
 Roof pitch and height
 Corner build standards
 Parking reduction
309

TAHOE VALLEY AREA PLAN
“We shall transform the Tahoe Valley area into a strong and vibrant business district, creating a community that includes continuous and complimentary developments. We shall embrace outdoor enthusiasts and provide a healthy balance of commerce, employment, entertainment, and livability. Our Area Plan will create smaller, safer pedestrian-friendly districts that encourage patrons to visit multiple destinations for each vehicle trip. Our plan shall encourage retail businesses and services that meet local needs, encourage local ownership, and appeal to visitors seeking to mix with the local community…Visually prominent and attractive design features shall welcome visitors entering the City from the scenic corridors of US 50 and SR 89…”
310
Private Redevelopments
 Blue Granite Climbing Gym
 The Crossings remodel
 Barton/Helen housing
 Sugar Pine Village entitlement
 Barton Orthopedic Center
Transportation and Circulation
 South “Y” Intersection Bike Lane Stripping
 Bike Path Rehabilitation
 Bicycle Transportation Signage System
 Pedestrian Improvements: Install sidewalks along
US 50 and SR 89
 Lake Tahoe Boulevard Bike Trail
SEZ Restoration Programs & Water Quality
Improvements
 US 50 Airport to “Y” Junction
 US 50 “Y” to Trout Creek
 SR 89 “Y” to Cascade Road
 Tahoe Valley Greenbelt water quality, open space,
and connectivity design
 Tahoe Urgent Care Demo

TAHOE VALLEY AREA PLAN

IMPLEMENTATION
311

AMENDMENT GOALS
 Implement Housing Element policies
 Implement and incentivize transportation and
connectivity
 Increase consistency with State laws regarding
housing and parking
 Explore ways to activate town centers
 General improvements and code corrections
312

PROCESS
Stakeholders Workshop
February 1, 2023
Planning Commission Workshop
February 23, 2023
City Council Information Meeting
May 16, 2023
Initial Environmental Review & Draft Amendments
In Progress
City Adoption
Estimated August
TRPA Adoption
Estimated September

PROVIDE INFORMATION

AND CONTEXT ABOUT

THE AREA PLAN UPDATE

SHARE PREVIOUSLY

RECEIVED

FEEDBACK

RECEIVE FEEDBACK

ON THE PROPOSED

AMENDMENTS
Today:
313

RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES
 Residential Density
 Increase maximum to 65 units/acre
 Set a minimum standard of 8 units/acre
 Accessory Dwelling Units
 Level of review for residential projects
 Create a uniform review process for market rate and income-restricted residential projects  Develop objective design standards to create a greater number opportunities for ministerial review of residential projects
314

REVITALIZATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
 Adverting for Accessory Uses
 Subject to the existing maximum sign area/number of
allowed signs
 Commercial Design Standards
 Make existing standards more objective
• Requiring design elements
• Building modulation
 Special Event Area
315

OUTDOOR DINNING & COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA
 Activate Streetscapes
 More Opportunities for Outdoor
Dining
 Create consistency between CFA
requirements for outdoor seating and
outdoor dining
 Develop standards to allow outdoor dining
up to a designated maximum amount of
square footage which would not be subject
to CFA requirements
316

TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
 Allow and prepare for a transition from vehicle traffic to active and public transportation
 Accommodations for alternative modes of transportation in place of vehicle parking spaces
 Reduction in parking spaces for right of way improvements beyond the project’s street frontage
 Shared parking or car share program
 Increased bicycle parking
 Parking space in-lieu fee. Funds used to develop or operate onstreet or off-street parking, alternative transportation or transit and related facilities or programs
 Parking and transportation management plan
317

ELECTRIC VEHICLE & SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE
 Encourage improvements to
infrastructure that facilitate electric
vehicles
 Reduce constraints related to
coverage maximums and transfer
requirements
 Exemptions or ministerial mitigation
process
318
AREA PLAN EXPANSIONS 1
3 2

1. Addition to Neighborhood Professional District
319

AREA PLAN EXPANSIONS

2. Addition to Gateway District 3. New District: Emerald Bay Road - Residential
320

TOWN CENTER OVERLAY
321

PERMISSIBLE USES
 Create consistency between areas that allow
multi-person, employee, and multi-family housing
 Expand general retail and personal service to
include:
 Health and athletic clubs
 Day spas
 Funeral parlors
 Consolidate amusement & recreation and
assembly & entertainment
 Distinguishing between small less impactful uses and
larger more impactful uses
322
QUESTIONS?
323
Tahoe Valley Area Plan/Specific Plan
Linking NeighborhoodsBuilding CommunityPromoting Recreation July 22, 2015
FINAL
324
325

TAHOE VALLEY AREA PLAN/SPECIFIC PLAN
City of South Lake Tahoe
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on June 2, 2015 Adopted by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency on July 22, 2015 326
327
Credits
South Lake Tahoe City Council
Hal Cole, Mayor
Wendy David, Mayor Pro Tem
JoAnn Conner
Tom Davis
Austin Sass
South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission
Judy Brown, Chair
Dale Rise, Vice-Chair
Scott Blumenthal
Shannon Eckmeyer
Craig Woodward
City of South Lake Tahoe
Nancy Kerry, City Manager
Shawna Brekke-Read, Director, Development Services
Hilary Roverud, Deputy Director, Development Services
Judy Finn, Associate Planner
Melinda Adams, Planning Technician
Lydia Zuniga, Commission Liaison
Eric Freelander, GIS Analyst
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Joanne Marchetta, Executive Director
John Hester, Chief Operating Officer
John Marshall, General Counsel
Brandy McMahon, Division Manager, Long Range Planning
Jennifer Canon, Associated Planner
Karen Fink, Senior Planner
Consultants
Martha Miller, Principal, Dyett and Bhatia
John Francis, Planner, Dyett and Bhatia
Steve Noll, Principal, Design Workshop
Eric Roverud, Associate, Design Workshop
Phil Scoles, Terra Science, Inc.

Brent Wolfe, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants
A special thanks to numerous individuals and organizations that have all played an important role in shaping the vision and delivering the contents of this Area Plan. The omission of those names here does not diminish the acknowledgement that each of them deserve. 328
Strategic Growth Council
The work upon which this publication is based was funded in whole or in part through a grant awarded by the Strategic Growth Council.”

Disclaimer
The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the GRANTEE and/or Subcontractor and not necessarily those of the Strategic Growth Council or of the Department of Conservation, or its employees. The Strategic Growth Council and the Department make no warranties, express or implied, and assume no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text.” 329
Table of Contents i July 22, 2015
Table of Contents
Section 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Relationship to the Tahoe Valley Community Plan.......................................................... 2

1.2 Area Plan Adoption .......................................................................................................... 2

1.3 Organization of the Area Plan .......................................................................................... 4 Section 2 LEGAL AUTHORITY AND REGULATORY SETTING .................................................. 7

2.1 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.................................................................................... 7

2.2 State of California............................................................................................................. 9

2.3 City of South Lake Tahoe................................................................................................. 9 Section 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS..............................................................................................15

3.1 Economic Conditions......................................................................................................15

3.2 Land Use ........................................................................................................................15

3.3 Transportation and Circulation .......................................................................................21

3.4 Public/Quasi Public Facilities and Services ...................................................................23

3.5 Natural and Cultural Resources .....................................................................................26 Section 4 VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES ..........................................................................41

4.1 Visions Statement ..........................................................................................................41

4.2 Guiding Principles ..........................................................................................................42 Section 5 LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN .....................................................................43

5.1 Land Use Districts ..........................................................................................................43

5.2 Goals and Policies..........................................................................................................46

5.3 Development and Design Standards .............................................................................50 Section 6 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................53

6.1 Goals and Policies..........................................................................................................53

6.2 Implementation...............................................................................................................55 Section 7 HOUSING......................................................................................................................57

7.1 Goals and Policies..........................................................................................................57 Section 8 TRANSPORTATIOIN AND CIRCULATION ................................................................. 61

8.1 Goals and Policies..........................................................................................................61

8.2 Implementation...............................................................................................................65 Section 9 PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES .............................................71

9.1 Goals and Policies..........................................................................................................71 Section 10 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES..............................................................73

10.1 Goals and Policies..........................................................................................................73

10.2 Implementation...............................................................................................................77 Section 11 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ...........................................................................87

10.1 Goals and Policies..........................................................................................................87

10.2 Implementation...............................................................................................................90 330
Table of Contents ii July 22, 2015
Section 12 SAFETY AND NOISE ................................................................................................. 93

10.1 Goals and Policies..........................................................................................................93 Section 13 INCENTIVE AND MITIGATION PROGRAMS............................................................97 Appendix A – References
Appendix B – TRPA Height Findings
Appendix C – Development and Design Standards
Appendix D – City of South Lake Tahoe Green Building Program Figures
Figure 1 Location Map
Figure 2 TRPA Conceptual Regional Land Use Map
Figure 3 General Plan Land Use Diagram
Figure 4 Existing Land Uses
Figure 5 Lake Tahoe Airport Overflight Safety Zones
Figure 6 Existing Transportation Facilities
Figure 7 Mapped 1987 Land Capability Districts
Figure 8 Existing Land Coverage
Figure 9 Existing Water Quality Improvements
Figure 10 Source Water Assessment Map
Figure 11 Existing Scenic Resources
Figure 12 Zoning Map
Figure 13 Transportation and Circulation Improvements
Figure 14 Proposed Scenic Resources
Figure 15 Amended Mapped Land Capability Districts
Figure 16 Proposed Water Quality Improvements
Figure 17 Conceptual Tahoe Valley Greenbelt
Figure 18 Conceptual Tahoe Valley Greenbelt Illustrations 331
Introduction 1 July 22, 2015
SECTION 1
Introduction
The Tahoe Valley Area Plan (Area Plan) serves as the comprehensive land use and zoning plan for the Tahoe Valley area, consistent with the Lake Tahoe Regional Plan (Regional Plan) and the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan (General Plan).

The plan is intended to realize the community’s vision, assist in achieving and maintaining the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s (TRPA) Environmental Threshold Carrying Capacities, implement the City of South Lake Tahoe Sustainability Plan, implement the Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (TMPO) Sustainable Communities Strategy, and implement the policy direction of both the Regional Plan and General Plan.

The Tahoe Valley Area Plan defines a vision for the future of the Tahoe Valley area. The Tahoe Valley Area Plan planning area (plan area) is a 337-acre area, centered on the US Highway 50 and State Route (SR) 89 “Y” intersection, in the southwest corner of South Lake Tahoe, California. The plan area is roughly bounded by 10th Street on the north, E Street on the south, Truckee Drive on the east, and Julie Lane on the west (Figure 1).

The Tahoe Valley area developed primarily in the 1950s as a commercial corridor for highway travelers.

While some of South Lake Tahoe (such as the Stateline/Ski Run area) has been transformed in the last ten years, the Tahoe Valley area has remained relatively stagnant. Exceptions include the Staples, Longs, Pier One, TJ Maxx, Ernie’s Coffee Shop, BevMo, and Coldwell Banker where significant improvements as a result of private investment have taken place.

This Area Plan sets a vision for the Tahoe Valley area based on a realistic assessment of the area's potential. The Area Plan sets policies as well as implementation measures to ameliorate existing conditions and create new development and redevelopment opportunities. It describes how this area can focus the resources needed to become a vital economic center of the South Shore and the Tahoe Basin while reflecting Tahoe Valley’s unique characteristics and supporting the local community’s vision.

The Area Plan provides more detailed direction for the Tahoe Valley area and incorporates both the Regional Plan and the General Plan by reference, including the respective implementing ordinances. The Area Plan integrates these plans to the extent practical to simplify compliance with local and regional requirements, and improve the efficiency of plan administration. It establishes the land use regulations, development standards, implementation strategies, and needed environmental improvements for the area, and encourages new development and redevelopment that enhances the built environment to revitalize the Tahoe Valley community. Renovation of this gateway to the South Shore is important to achieving the City’s economic development goals for revitalizing the community, improving infrastructure, and diversifying the local tax base.
332
Introduction 2 July 22, 2015

1.1 Relationship to the Tahoe Valley Community Plan
Tahoe Valley was initially designated a “Preliminary Community Plan” area in the City’s 1999 General Plan and TRPA’s 1987 Regional Plan. The Tahoe Valley Community Plan was initiated in February 2003 through a joint planning effort by the City and TRPA. That process resulted in the Draft Tahoe Valley Community Plan that was published in March 27, 2007, and presented to the City Council on April 3, 2007. The City retained Pacific Municipal Consultants to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the draft community plan, which was completed in November 2008 but was not circulated. Because TRPA was in the midst of updating their 1987 Regional Plan that had the potential to alter land use regulations and incentives strategies, a decision was made to postpone adoption of the community plan until after an updated Regional Plan was adopted. Subsequently, TRPA adopted an updated Regional Plan in December 2012 that fundamentally changed the community planning process and provided an alternative planning process for local jurisdictions to adopt conforming Area Plans.

1.2 Area Plan Adoption
The South Lake Tahoe City Council and TRPA Governing Board will hold public hearings and take action on the Tahoe Valley Area Plan. Once found in conformance with the City’s General Plan and TRPA’s Regional Plan and adopted by both, this Area Plan will serve as the governing plan for the Tahoe Valley area for both the City of South Lake Tahoe and TRPA. This Area Plan will supersede Plan Area Statement (PAS) #110, South “Y”, and a small portion of PAS 114, “Bonanza” (APNs: 32-141-02 and -18) for the purposes of land use regulation for both agencies and will provide management direction for all projects proposed within the plan’s boundaries.
333
Introduction 3 July 22, 2015 334
Introduction 4 July 22, 2015

1.3 Organization of the Area Plan
Following this Introduction, Section 2 characterizes the legal authority and regulatory setting of South Lake Tahoe. Section 3 provides an overview of the Area Plan’s existing conditions and opportunities and constraints for redevelopment and conservation. Section 4 summarizes the plan’s vision for the future and guiding principles for development and redevelopment. Sections 5-12 outline the policy direction for the plan, with individual sections on the following:

Section 5 – Land Use and Community Design
This section supplements the Land Use Element of the TRPA Regional Plan, and the Land Use Element of the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. This section includes the Area Plan’s Goals and Policies related to land use and community design, and establishes land use and zoning regulations for the Area Plan.

Section 6 – Economic Development
This section supplements the Economic Development Element of the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan.

This section includes the Area Plan’s Goals and Policies related to economic development and sustainability to create a vibrant and sustainable local economy.

Section 7 – Housing
This section supplements the Housing Subelement of the TRPA Regional Plan, and the Housing Element of the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. This Section includes the Area Plan’s Goals and Policies related to housing to achieve the Plan’s vision of increasing the availability of quality workforce housing and affordable housing.

Section 8 – Transportation and Circulation
This section supplements the Transportation Element of the TRPA Regional Plan, TRPA/Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization (TMPO) Regional Transportation Plan, and the Transportation and Circulation Element of the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. Consistent with these plans, this section lists the specific policies applicable to the Area Plan and describes the improvements necessary to implement these policies.

Section 9 – Public/Quasi-Public Facilities and Services This section supplements the Public Services and Facilities Element of the TRPA Regional Plan and the Public/Quasi-Public Facilities and Services Element of the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. This section identifies public/quasi-public service providers and needed improvement to facilities and services.

Section 10 – Natural and Cultural Resources
This section supplements the Conservation Element of the TRPA Regional Plan and the Natural and Cultural Resources Element of the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. It contains the Area Plan's environmental conservation and management strategy. It lists the needed environmental improvements for the Area Plan.

Section 11 – Recreation
This section supplements the Recreation Element of the TRPA Regional Plan and the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. It contains the plan’s strategy for improving recreational opportunities and identifies proposed recreational improvements within the plan. 335
Introduction 5 July 22, 2015
Section 12 – Health, Safety, and Noise
This section supplements the Noise Subelement of the TRPA Regional Plan, and the Health and Safety Element of the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. This section includes the Area Plan’s Goals and Policies related to public health and safety issues.

Section 13 – Incentive Programs
This section supplements the Implementation Element of the TRPA Regional Plan and the Implementation Program of the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. It describes public and private sector implementation strategies including capital improvement projects and planning and coordination activities, including a summary of incentives, and the plan reporting and revision process.

Appendix A – References
Appendix B – TRPA Height Findings
Appendix B includes height findings that are required for any structure that exceeds three stories in height.

Appendix C – Development and Design Standards
Appendix C sets development standards, design standards and permissible uses for the Area Plan’s land use districts. The standards are intended to improve the scenic quality of the built environment, promote a sense of place, and support the community’s desired community character. Development, redevelopment, or expansions of existing uses will be reviewed by the City or TRPA for consistency with these standards.

Appendix D – City of South Lake Tahoe Green Building Program Appendix D sets criteria for earning City incentives for incorporating exceptional energy efficiency in new and redeveloped projects.
336
Introduction 6 July 22, 2015 337
Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting 7 July 22, 2015
SECTION 2
Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting
The City of South Lake Tahoe plans and regulates within the policy and regulatory framework of both the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) and the State of California. This section describes the policy and regulatory framework for the Tahoe Valley Area Plan.

The purpose of the Tahoe Valley Area Plan is to define land use regulations and guidelines for planning decisions. The Tahoe Valley Area Plan presents principles, goals, policies and implementation strategies designed to encourage redevelopment, create a vibrant walkable pedestrian oriented community and provide for environmental improvements. The Area Plan is used by the City and TRPA to review specific development proposals in Tahoe Valley. The Plan also provides direction to property owners, community groups, and interested individuals in planning and design of development and redevelopment projects.

The Tahoe Valley Area Plan, once adopted, will become a part of TRPA’s Regional Plan and the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan. The Area Plan will also revise the official zoning map of the City of South Lake Tahoe.

2.1 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Regional Plan
In December 2012, the TRPA Governing Board adopted an updated Regional Plan. The TRPA Regional Plan Goals and Policies serve as a guide for all future land use decisions within the Tahoe Region.

Priorities of the updated Regional Plan that apply to this Area Plan include:
 Accelerating water quality restoration and other Threshold gains by supporting environmental redevelopment opportunities, restoration of disturbed lands and Environmental Improvement Program (EIP) investments.
 Transitioning to more permitting by local governments to create “one-stop-shopping” for homeowner improvements in order to return TRPA to the more regional role the Compact originally intended.
 Creating walkable communities and increasing alternative transportation options.  Retaining the established regional growth control system. Under this system, rampant overdevelopment was stopped and open spaces preserved. Most of the policies from the 1987 Regional Plan stayed in place with adoption of the 2012 Regional Plan.  Creating a more efficient planning system that integrates TRPA requirements into the plans and permits of other government agencies.
338
Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting 8 July 22, 2015
 Encouraging property owners to transfer development rights from sensitive or outlying areas to Town Centers with the goal of restoring these lands.
 Eliminating regulatory barriers to the environmental redevelopment of rundown buildings.  Simplifying burdensome regulations for homeowners while achieving threshold gain.  Integrating with the TRPA/TMPO Regional Transportation Plan to support sidewalk and bike trail projects that reduce automobile dependency and increase walkability and safety.  Continuing to deliver restoration projects under the EIP that achieve erosion control on roadways and restore forests and wetlands.

TRPA’s Regional Plan Conceptual Land Use Map classifies the majority of Tahoe Valley as Mixed-Use and also designates a portion of the area as Residential, Town Center Overlay, and Stream Restoration Plan Area. TRPA’s Regional Conceptual Land Use Map is depicted in Figure 2.

The following descriptions define the intention and purpose of TRPA’s land use classification, overlay districts and special designations:

Mixed-Use: Mixed-use areas are urban areas that have been designated to provide a mix of commercial, public services, light industrial, office, and residential uses to the Region or have the potential to provide future commercial, public service, light industrial, office, and residential uses. The purpose of this classification is to concentrate higher intensity land uses for public convenience, and enhanced sustainability.

Residential: Residential areas are urban areas having potential to provide housing for the residents of the Region. In addition, the purpose of this classification is to identify density patterns related to both the physical and manmade characteristics of the land and to allow accessory and non-residential uses that complement the residential neighborhood. These lands include: (1) areas now developed for residential purposes; (2) areas of moderate-to-good land capability; (3) areas within urban boundaries and serviced by utilities; and (4) areas of centralized location in close proximity to commercial services and public facilitates.

Town Centers: Town centers contain most of the Region’s non-residential services and have been identified as a significant source of sediments and other contaminants that continue to enter Lake Tahoe. Town centers are targeted for redevelopment in a manner that improves environmental conditions, creates a more sustainable and less auto-dependent development pattern and provides economic opportunities in the Region.

Stream Restoration Plan Area: Stream Restoration Plan Areas are Stream Environment Zones along major waterways that have been substantially degraded by prior or existing development. Individual Restoration Plans should be developed for each Stream Restoration Plan Area in coordination with the applicable local government and property owners in the plan area. Restoration Plans may be developed as a component of an Area Plan or as a separate document and should identify feasible opportunities for environmental restoration.
339
Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting 9 July 22, 2015
Area Plan
Area Plans allow for planning that is responsive to the unique circumstances of communities within the Tahoe Region. TRPA and local governments, in close coordination with the local community, may prepare plans for a specific area in conformance with the Regional Plan. The authority and requirements for this Area Plan are provided in Chapter 13 (Area Plans) of the TRPA Code of Ordinances.

Sustainable Communities Strategies
California’s Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) requires metropolitan planning organizations to develop regional land use and transportation policies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from cars and light trucks in order to meet targets established by the California Air Resources Board’s Regional Targets Advisory Committee. SB 375 calls for each metropolitan planning organization to develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) identifying the transportation, land use, and housing strategies that will reduce regional GHG emissions. The TRPA/TMPO adopted Regional Transportation Plan serves as the Region’s Sustainable Community Strategy Plan.

The Tahoe Valley Area Plan is designed to be consistent with the TRPA Regional Transportation Plan and the SCS by providing a framework for implementing land use and transportation practices to reduce GHG emissions. These strategies include creating a mixed-use, pedestrian and transit oriented land use pattern, providing for alternative modes of transportation and encouraging a variety of housing types within close proximity to transit, services and employment centers.

2.2 State of California
The Tahoe Valley Area Plan is designed to meet State of California requirements for specific plans and to facilitate the implementation of development goals and policies by establishing zoning districts, standards and criteria for development, and to set the distribution, location and extent of planned land uses consistent with the adopted City General Plan.

2.3 City of South Lake Tahoe
The City of South Lake Tahoe must adhere to both TRPA plans and regulations adopted pursuant to the Compact and to California State law, to the extent that State laws do not conflict with the Compact.

Under the Compact, TRPA addresses general regional matters, while the City retains its power over purely local matters. The City can adopt more strict regulations than TRPA and can regulate matters over which TRPA has no authority.

General Plan (2011)
The City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan designation for Tahoe Valley is Town Center (TC). This designation provides for a mixture of uses, including tourist accommodation, commercial, intensive recreation, high-density residential, and mixed-use residential. This designation is applied to areas that are currently developed as commercial/visitor centers, have excess land coverage, where vertical mixeduse projects are appropriate, and are near commercial, employment, transit, and public services. The City’s General Land Use Diagram is depicted in Figure 3. 340
Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting 10 July 22, 2015 The overall purpose of the Town Center is to:
 Provide for the orderly, well-planned, and balanced growth of the Town Center and support the area’s role as an important commercial, tourist, and recreation center that provides full services to residents while appealing to visitors.
 Promote the Town Center as a pedestrian- and transit-oriented, mixed-use activity center and a gateway to an outdoor tourism recreational destination and expand its role as an economic center for residents of South Lake Tahoe.
 Encourage a mix of uses that promotes convenience, economic vitality, and a pleasant quality of life and improve access to a greater range of facilities and services for residents and visitors.  Establish development and design standards that improve pedestrian- and transit-orientation and the visual quality of development and that will create unified, distinctive, and attractive community character.

The General Plan includes the following policies that are directly applicable to the Tahoe Valley Area Plan:

Policy LU-2.2 directs the City to periodically update and implement the four community plans, of which Tahoe Valley is one, as a way to focus development commodities and revitalization efforts.

Policy LU-2.7 directs the City to transform the Tahoe Valley area into an attractive gateway commercial district that serves both residents and visitors.

Policy LU-2.9 defines Tahoe Valley as one of the City’s nodes that is targeted for future development and revitalization.

Policy LU-2.10 encourages the use of incentives to create a compact, mixed-use, transit-oriented, and higher-density development pattern within the Tahoe Valley area.

Policy LU-2.11 designates the Tahoe Valley as a primary area in the City for resident-serving commercial uses, workforce housing and affordable housing. Furthermore, the policy encourages transforming the area into a contemporary, pedestrian-oriented, mixed use, commercial service district served by a transit center and alternate transportation opportunities.

Policy LU-2.13 designates the Tahoe Valley area as a social and economic center that includes a variety of housing types, mixed-use development, recreational or social gathering spaces, cultural uses, civic uses and facilities, and commercial services.

The development of the Tahoe Valley Area Plan is intended to meet the directive of the General Plan policies outlined above.

Sustainability Plan
The City of South Lake Tahoe adopted policies for sustainable development and “green” buildings in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The policies call for creating a sustainable and energy-efficient built environment as a key vision of the City of South Lake Tahoe. The policies provide direction on the use of “green” building technology, energy efficiency, and strategies to achieve sustainable development practices.
341
Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting 11 July 22, 2015 The City has implemented specific strategies including providing streamlined permitting to encourage “green” building practices and instituting a plastic bag ban for grocery stores, food vendors, and retail establishments.

Plan Area Statements
Once adopted, the Tahoe Valley Area Plan will replace Plan Area Statement (PAS) 110, South “Y”, and a small portion of PAS 114, “Bonanza” (APNs: 32-141-02 and -18).

Standards and Guidelines
The City of South Lake Tahoe and TRPA have jointly adopted Standards and Guidelines that include citywide design standards, guidelines, and specific design standards for the three previously adopted Community Plans.

The citywide design standards and guidelines as well as specific substitute design standards tailored towards the Area Plan are incorporated in the Tahoe Valley Area Plan and will provide design guidance for the Area Plan.

Smart Growth Principles
In August 2005, the South Lake Tahoe City Council endorsed a set of Smart Growth Principles for possible inclusion in the City General Plan for South Lake Tahoe. These principles are organized under the following headings:
● Land Use
● Transportation
● Community Livability
● Governance
The Tahoe Valley Area Plan is designed to implement the City’s smart growth principles by encouraging a land use pattern that focuses on walkable, compact mixed-use centers, with access to transportation choices while preserving open spaces and critical environmental areas. 342
Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting 12 July 22, 2015 343 Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting 13 July 22, 2015 344 Legal Authority and Regulatory Setting 14 July 22, 2015 345 Existing Conditions 15 July 22, 2015
SECTION 3
Existing Conditions
This section describes the existing physical conditions within the Tahoe Valley plan area, both natural and human-made. The Tahoe Valley area has been extensively altered by human activity and development since it was first settled in the late 1800s. The present pattern of development in the area has evolved primarily since the 1950s. The conditions summarized in this section act as opportunities or constraints (or sometimes both) to development, redevelopment, and conservation of resources within the plan area.

This section is organized into the following topics: Land Use, Economic Conditions, Transportation and Circulation, Public/Quasi-Public Facilities and Services, Natural Resources and Cultural Resources, Open Space, and Health and Safety.

3.1 Economic Conditions
The economy of South Lake Tahoe is largely dependent upon tourism, which fluctuates seasonally. The lodging industry at the South Shore has experienced substantial difficulties over the past 10 years. The number of annual rooms rented has declined 35 percent. More recently, a slight uptick has been observed in 2010/2011, and reports indicate 2011/2012 also showed slight improvements. However, these figures are still substantially lower than the levels seen in 2001/2002 and before, which translates into less local revenue generated as well as fewer job opportunities. (TTD, 2013).

The Tahoe Valley area is largely dominated by strip commercial development along South Lake Tahoe’s key corridor (US 50). Shortcomings of this type of development include the area’s many curb cuts for driveways, relatively small and fragmented parcels, stand-alone structures, older motels struggling to be profitable, and lack of continuous sidewalks, bike paths, landscaping, and other amenities. In addition, this type of development pattern is difficult and costly to modify. South Lake Tahoe also has a strict regulatory environment created around the need to protect the environment in the Tahoe Basin, which adds to the challenges of redevelopment.

In summary, there is a clear need to revitalize the physical appearance and accessibility of the area to increase economic activity. The area is in a unique position to capture more local-resident-serving commercial sales, as well as capture more tourist sales.

3.2 Land Use
Neighboring Land Uses
The Tahoe Valley plan area is bounded on the north, west, and south primarily by residential subdivisions, dating from the 1960s to the 1990s. The plan area is bordered on the east by the Upper Truckee Marsh and to the southeast by the South Lake Tahoe Airport. 346
Existing Conditions 16 July 22, 2015
Land Uses
The plan area is made up of a variety of existing land uses, including residential, commercial, tourist accommodation, industrial, and public service. Table 1 summarizes existing uses within the plan area by acreage, percentage of total acreage, and number of parcels. The plan area encompasses 337 acres and 482 individual parcels (not including existing roadway/infrastructure related parcels) as shown in Figure

4. Tahoe Valley is the gateway neighborhood for South Lake Tahoe, and includes various commercial uses such as clothing stores, factory outlets, automotive supply stores and dealerships, drug and liquor stores, restaurants, and supermarkets. These uses occupy structures ranging in age and physical condition, from the 1890’s to present day construction.

Table 1
Existing Land Use
Land Use Acres Percent of Acreage
Residential 37.2 11.1%
Tourist 12.0 3.6%
Commercial 141.0 41.9%
Public 19.2 5.7%
Quasi-Public 8.2 2.4%
Recreation 3.3 1.0%
Vacant Private 18.1 5.4%
Vacant Public 14.8 4.4%
Open Space 20.2 6.0%
Roads and Infrastructure 62.5 18.6%
TOTAL 336.5 100%
Source: TRPA GIS, March 2014.

Residential
Based on 2013 TRPA data, the plan area includes a total of 37.2 acres of residential land, of which 16.1 acres are single-family homes, 16.3 acres are multi-family, and 3.8 acres are mobile homes. The area adjacent to the Barton Hospital in particular contains a diverse range of housing types, including single and multi-family dwellings, senior care facilities, and mobile homes. The age and quality of these structures vary widely. The Industrial District contains a number of residential units, which are nonconforming under an industrial designation. The residential units in the plan area, for the most part, tend to be lower-priced rentals rather than owner-occupied housing.

Non-Residential
The plan area contains a wide array of commercial uses, most of which are located in commercial centers along the highways. The plan area does have several major commercial centers surrounding the Y intersection. These include a center anchored by a Raley’s supermarket and Kmart, an outlet store center, and commercial retail property occupied by a TJ Maxx. The area east of the Y intersection along Lake Tahoe Boulevard contains a car dealership, hardware store, and a tire sales and repair center. 347
Existing Conditions 17 July 22, 2015
The plan area also contains a mix of light industrial uses concentrated primarily in the northern part of Tahoe Valley. These uses include small-scale manufacturing, a solid waste transfer and recycling facility, auto repair shops, warehousing, wholesale, and other light industrial service uses. Many of these businesses are adjacent to residential uses.

Public and quasi-public uses are discussed in detail under Public/Quasi-Public Facilities and Services.

Vacant Lands
Approximately 18.1 acres (5.4 percent) of the plan area are currently (2014) vacant and privately owned.

These vacant lots are not concentrated in any one part of the plan area, rather they are scattered throughout the plan area.

Publicly-Owned Open Space
The plan area contains a number of (6 percent, 20.2 acres) of publicly-owned vacant open space parcels.

These properties are owned by the United States Forest Service, California Tahoe Conservancy, or City of South Lake Tahoe and are subject to various use and development restrictions based on which agency owns the property and the manner in which the property was acquired.

California Tahoe Conservancy Asset Lands
The California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC) owns six (6) parcels, totaling 16.4 acres, in the plan area that are considered “asset lands” and may be available for development. The CTC’s overall land inventory totals 4,677 parcels accounting for more than 6,500 acres, of that total there are 17 Conservancy-owned properties throughout the basin that are regarded as “asset lands.” Asset lands are parcels which are not essential to carrying out Conservancy goals, which could have significant market value, and which are not otherwise restricted from disposal by law or Board policy. In fact, some asset lands, at the time of acquisition, were identified for possible future transfer or sale. The CTC defines these classes of lands as “Area Plan or Town Center Asset Lands.” These area plan asset lands are considered to be developable lands, or portions thereof, in highly urbanized areas that could support sustainable, compact development or other uses consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Regional Plan and local area plans (CTC, 2014). There are a total of 17 area plan asset land parcels located basin-wide with 6 of those located within the boundaries of the Tahoe Valley Area Plan. The Tahoe Valley Area Plan asset lands account for approximately 16.4 acres and all the parcels are vacant except for one located on Tata Lane. The parcel is currently developed as an offsite parking lot.

Commercial Floor Area
TRPA regulates the rate and timing of growth within the region, including commercial floor area (CFA).

TRPA requires an allocation from the City or from TRPA prior to constructing a project or commencing a use that creates additional CFA. TRPA also allows transferring and reconfiguring legally existing commercial floor area. The Tahoe Valley plan area contains approximately 1,161,000 square feet of existing developed CFA. An additional 15,000 square feet of CFA will be made available by the City for use upon adoption of the Tahoe Valley Area Plan.
348
Existing Conditions 18 July 22, 2015
Lake Tahoe Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
As part of the land use planning process mandated by the Division of Aeronautics and the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, several Airport Land Use Commissions (ALUCs) have been formed throughout the state to prepare and administer Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUPs) for each publicuse airport in the state. El Dorado County has an operating ALUC that has prepared CLUPs for the airports in the county. However, the City of South Lake Tahoe has been named as the administrator of the Lake Tahoe Airport. As such, the City operates as its own ALUC and the City has developed the Lake Tahoe Airport CLUP.

The southeastern portion of the Tahoe Valley plan area lies within the Overflight Safety Zone (Safety Zone 3) and under the Horizontal Imaginary Surface of the Lake Tahoe Airport CLUP. Safety Zone 3 (see Figure 5) is the least restrictive Safety Zone around the airport and thus only privately owned assembly and entertainment, publicly owned assembly and entertainment, collection stations, and sport assemblies are prohibited within that area. The Horizontal Surface, located over the same portion of the plan area as Safety Zone 3, is located at 6,419 feet elevation, 98 feet above the highest point in the Area Plan.

The Lake Tahoe Airport is in the process of updating the Airport Master Plan. Once the Master Plan is adopted by the City and TRPA, the CLUP, now referred to as an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), will also need to be updated.
349
Existing Conditions 19 July 22, 2015 350
Existing Conditions 20 July 22, 2015 351
Existing Conditions 21 July 22, 2015

3.3 Transportation and Circulation
Roadways
The Tahoe Valley plan area is served by a variety of arterial, collector, and local streets. The existing road network is shown in Figure 6.

The highway and street network within the plan area is largely dominated by US Highway 50 (Lake Tahoe Blvd.) and State Route (SR) 89 (Emerald Bay Rd.). US Highway 50 is the major east-west roadway facility connecting Sacramento, California and Carson City, Nevada, and is the main facility serving the South Shore area of Lake Tahoe. East of the “Y” intersection, US Highway 50 is also Lake Tahoe Boulevard. Along most of its 1.5 mile length within the plan area, Lake Tahoe Blvd is a five-lane arterial with a continuous two-way left-turn median lane that transitions to dedicated left-turn pockets at major intersections. In addition to Lake Tahoe Blvd, a network of arterial, collector, and local streets that provide the remaining framework for the overall roadway system. These secondary streets serve as the connection points to adjacent neighborhoods as well as access to the Area Plan’s Industrial District and Hospital District.

A well-functioning transportation and circulation system is necessary to address peak hour congestion.

The existing road network is relatively limited and experiences high traffic volumes during peak visitor periods.

Level of Service
TRPA’s Regional Plan Goals and Policies and Regional Transportation Plan, as well as the City’s General Plan, set standards for vehicle “level of service” (LOS). LOS is a qualitative measure that describes the operating performance of transportation facilities. For roadways, LOS is an indicator of traffic flow from the perspective of motorists based on factors such as speed, travel time, delay, freedom to maneuver, volume, and capacity. It is defined on a scale from LOS A, the least congested operating conditions, to LOS F, the most congested operating conditions.

The TRPA Regional Plan and City General Plan require that peak period traffic flow not exceed LOS D for major roadways (arterials and collector routes), and signalized intersections shall be at LOS D. LOS E may be acceptable during peak periods, not to exceed 4 hours per day.

The US 50/SR 89 intersection is operating at LOS C while US 50 roadway segments are operating at LOS E during the summer Friday evening peak hour (TRPA, 2012).

While a number of roadways currently operate at LOS D or E, the key intersections connecting those facilities generally operate at LOS C or better. This is because many of those intersections have been designed with additional travel lanes, channelized “free” right-turn movements, and other capacity enhancements to operations for this segment (TRPA, 2012).

Curbs and Gutters
The City has historically required curb and gutter improvements only for projects requiring the issuance of a Special Use Permit. As a result, much of the Tahoe Valley plan area contains a discontinuous system 352
Existing Conditions 22 July 22, 2015
of curbs, gutters, and roadside stormwater infiltration. Along US 50, Caltrans has recently constructed a water quality improvement project that resulted in the installation of curbs and gutters from the Y intersection to E Street. Curbs and gutters are also scheduled to be installed on SR 89 from the “Y” intersection heading north in 2014 and on US 50 from the “Y” intersection to Trout Creek in 2016. “Y” Intersection
The “Y” intersection commonly refers to the intersection of US 50, SR 89, and Lake Tahoe Boulevard.

During peak tourist periods high traffic volumes and weather-related reductions in roadway capacity or vehicle speeds, westbound traffic on US 50 south of the “Y” to form queues that back through the “Y” and east on US 50. This is primarily due to a merger of two westbound lanes to a single lane when high volumes of traffic is leaving the Tahoe Basin in a short period of time. While the frequency and length of queue conditions vary year-to-year and records of queue periods are not kept, it is reasonable to estimate that queues form one to three hours per day on roughly 20 days per year for a total of roughly 50 hours per year (CSLT, 2005).

The intersection was improved in 2009 with restriped lanes, improved signalization and an improved right-turn “bypass lane” for the northbound-to-eastbound and the westbound-to-northbound movements, separated from through traffic by a raised island.

Parking Facilities
Most private commercial and industrial businesses provide off-street parking for employees and patrons. However, many of these properties do not meet current parking requirements of Chapter 5 of the City Code. This forces many people to park on roadways and unpaved areas which creates a problem for snow removal and street sweeping equipment. There are presently no off-street publicly-owned parking facilities within the plan area.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
The City of South Lake Tahoe’s bicycle network is made up of three classes of bicycle facilities (classified by the California Department of Transportation), as follows:
• Class I Shared_Use Path Path. These paths provides a completely separated right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with cross-flow from vehicles minimized. Existing Class I facilities in the Area Plan are limited, consisting of relatively short segments south and east of the Factory Outlet Stores at the “Y” intersection and a facility crossing the Upper Truckee River just to the north of US 50 in the eastern end of the Area Plan. A nearby Class I facility follows SR 89 to Camp Richardson and Spring Creek, starting at the northern end of Eloise Avenue at 15th Street.
• Class II Bike Lane. Class II facilities provides a striped lane for one-way bicycle travel on a street or highway. Within the Area Plan, these facilities are provided along Tahoe Keys Boulevard, Helen Avenue, Melba Drive, B Street, C Street, 10th Street, Lake Tahoe Boulevard west of the “Y” intersection, and US 50 from the “Y” intersection just beyond E street. • Class III Bike Route. As with Class II facilities provides for shared use with bicycle or motor vehicle traffic, typically on lower volume roadways. Class III facilities are typically provided along low-volume streets to minimize the potential for conflicts between bicyclists and motorists. In the Area Plan, Class III routes are designated along Eloise Avenue and SR 89 north of the “Y” 353
Existing Conditions 23 July 22, 2015
intersection. This route connects to the Class I path that roughly parallels SR 89 to Camp Richardson and beyond.

The Tahoe Valley plan area contains various Class I, II, and III Bicycle Routes (Figure 6). Where bike facilities are not provided it is common to see pedestrians and bicyclists using the street right-of-ways to navigate the community.

Transit Services and Facilities
South Lake Tahoe, including the Tahoe Valley plan area, is served by BlueGo fixed route bus service, seasonal recreation routes, and Amtrak buses. A senior van service assists many area seniors in getting to appointments and running errands. The routes of these various transit services are shown in Figure 6.

All fixed route bus stops within the plan area have benches, while some of the stops also provide shelter for bus users. The City has been coordinating with the Tahoe Transportation District on installing additional bus shelters along US 50 as funding becomes available.

The Y Transit Center is located at the southwest corner of the Y intersection. This center is one of two City-owned transit centers, and provides a transfer point for transit users on the BlueGo fixed-route bus services. The transit center is also served by Amtrak buses connecting to the Capitol Corridor train route in Sacramento.

South Lake Tahoe Airport
The Tahoe Valley plan area is located approximately one mile northwest of the Lake Tahoe Airport. The airport, which is a general aviation airport owned and operated by the City of South Lake Tahoe, contains a single north-south 8,541 foot long runway. The airport facility includes a commercial passenger terminal, 169 plane tie-down spaces, and a 57-unit hangar and storage complex.

According to the airport administration, aircraft presently based (2014) at the airport consist of 22 single engine, three multi-engine aircraft, and three helicopters. There were 23,540 annual operations counted by the FAA tower in 2010 (FAA Air Traffic Activity System [ATADS] http://aspm.faa.gov/opsnet/sys/Airport.asp).

3.4 Public/Quasi-Public Facilities and Services
This section describes the public and quasi-public facilities and services located in the Tahoe Valley plan area. In addition to these, the area hosts several cellular towers, offices for local power and gas suppliers, day care centers, places of worship, and social service organizations.

Water and Wastewater Services
Water service within the Tahoe Valley plan area is provided by the South Tahoe Public Utilities District (STPUD) and Lukins Brothers Water Company (Lukins). STPUD provides water service to the majority of the plan area. Lukins provides water services to parcels located north of Emerald Bay Road and west of Dunlap Drive.
354
Existing Conditions 24 July 22, 2015
STPUD is a California Special District established in 1950. The 27,000-acre service area covers the South Shore of Lake Tahoe from Emerald Bay on the west, Christmas Valley on the south, the CaliforniaNevada state line to the east, and Lake Tahoe to the north. The District’s water supply comes entirely from 20 active municipal wells that pump groundwater from the Lake Tahoe Basin. The District maintains one pump station and one active groundwater well within the plan area.

The Lukins Brothers Water Company is a private water purveyor established in 1942 which is governed by the California Public Utility Commission. It provides service to approximately 200 customers within the Tahoe Valley plan area including businesses (75 percent), single-family (5 percent) and multi-family (20 percent) dwellings.

Wastewater collection service within the Tahoe Valley plan area is provided by STPUD. STPUD collects and treats wastewater from businesses and residents within the District’s service area, which encompasses approximately 42 square miles and includes the City of South Lake Tahoe and unincorporated area of El Dorado County within the Tahoe Basin. The District’s wastewater collection/treatment/recycling processes include a maximum 7.7 million gallons per day (mgd) advanced secondary operation serving 17,000 customers. The District’s collection system and wastewater treatment plant produces an average dry day rate of 4.3 mgd, 100 percent of which is recycled. Flows are conveyed to the District’s Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The District’s WWTP, last expanded in 1989, has a capacity 7.7 mgd. Treated effluent is exported 26 miles to Harvey Place Reservoir in Alpine County (STPUD, 2007 & 2014).

Electricity Services
Liberty Utilities provides electrical services to the plan area. Service is primarily transmitted over existing overhead lines along collector and local streets and underground along arterials (i.e., US 50, SR 89 and Lake Tahoe Boulevard). Liberty Utilities’ office is also located within the Area Plan on Eloise Avenue.

Gas Services
Natural gas service in the Tahoe Valley area is provided by Southwest Gas, which has been providing gas to the South Lake Tahoe area since 1963. Southwest Gas is regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission for the service they provide in California.

Telephone and Cable Services
AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile provide telephone and cellular service to the plan area. Charter Cable provides cable television, phone and internet services under a franchise agreement with the City. Three cellular towers are located within the plan area.

City of South Lake Tahoe Facilities
 City Services Center. Located at 1052 Tata Lane, this facility is owned by the City and houses the Development Services Department and Engineering Division of the Public Works Department.  Fire Station #3. Located at 2101 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, this facility is owned by the City and is one of three fire stations that serve South Lake Tahoe. This station serves the Tahoe Valley area with response times between three and five minutes.
355
Existing Conditions 25 July 22, 2015
 Transit Center. The transit center, owned by the City of South Lake Tahoe and located at the “Y” intersection, provides shelter and a transfer location for the BlueGo bus system, and a pickup/drop-off point for Amtrak buses.

El Dorado County Facilities
 El Dorado County Department of Transportation. Located at 924 Emerald Bay, this privatelyowned facility is rented by the County.  El Dorado County Health and Human Services Agency. Located at 1900 Tata Lane, this office includes the Mental Health, Public Health, Community Services, and Social Services divisions.

State Facilities
 California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC). Located at 1061 Third Street, the Conservancy is an independent State agency within the State Resource Agency. It was established in its present form by State law in 1984 to develop and implement programs through acquisitions and site improvements to improve water quality in Lake Tahoe, preserve the scenic beauty and recreational opportunities of the region, provide public access, preserve wildlife habitats, and manage and restore natural lands. Conservancy staff is housed in a privately-owned, rented building.

Federal Facilities
 Lake Valley Post Office. Located at 950 Emerald Bay Road, this post office provides post office boxes for the 96158 zip code and full postal services to customers out of a privately-owned rented building.
 Tahoe Resource Conservation District. Located in a privately owned building at 870 Emerald Bay Road, the Tahoe Resource Conservation District promotes the conservation, stewardship and education of the Lake Tahoe Region’s natural resources.

Barton HealthCare System Facilities
Barton Memorial Hospital has served the South Lake Tahoe community since 1963 as a regional medical center. Part of the Barton HealthCare System, Barton Hospital is South Lake Tahoe’s largest medical facility and largest employer (900 employees). The hospital and its associated medical clinics and emergency medical centers perform approximately 3,180 surgeries (2,800 within the City limits and 380 outside the City limits) and 20,000 emergency visits per year (Lyn Barnett, per. comm. 4/17/2014).

South Tahoe Refuse
South Tahoe Refuse has franchise agreements with the City of South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado County, and Douglas County for the collection and transportation of solid waste to processing and/or disposal facilities. This includes waste from all residential, commercial, and industrial properties, including recyclable material. These facilities support the processing of this waste before its ultimate disposal outside of the Tahoe Basin. South Tahoe Refuse operates the following facilities:
 Administrative Office/Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility/Resource Recovery Facility/Tahoe Basin Container Service. All located at 2140 Ruth Avenue. 356
Existing Conditions 26 July 22, 2015
 Recycling Center. Located at 2192 Ruth Avenue.
 Truck parking, fueling, and wash facility. Located at 2143 Ruth Avenue.

3.5 Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural resources within the Tahoe Valley plan area include the Upper Truckee River, two ephemeral streams, natural and landscaped vegetation, stream environment zones, and views of distant mountain ridgelines. The plan area includes three drainage basins including the Tahoe Valley system that runs south of the “Y” intersection, which is directly, connected to the Truckee River. The other two drainage basins drain into the Tahoe Keys Lagoons before being released into Pope Marsh. Many properties contain excess coverage over the Bailey land capability limitations.

Native vegetation consists primarily of Jeffrey pine and white fir trees with little under story vegetation on high-capability lands and willows and grasses on low-capability lands. Many of the developed parcels are also landscaped with native vegetation. Stream environment zones within the plan area generally have been disturbed.

Land Capability and Stream Environment Zone
The land capability system established by Bailey is the basis of the land coverage standards and limitations set forth in Chapter 30 of the TRPA Code of Ordinances. Chapter 30 uses land capability districts (LCDs) ranging from class 1 to 7 that assign a percentage of allowable land coverage in a designated LCD area as identified below:
 Land capability classes 1a-c and 2 are not suited for urbanization or intensive forestry use, but are suited for open space, conservation areas, and low-intensity recreation.  Land capability classes 3 and 4 are not suited for urbanization but are suited for forestry and low-density housing use.
 Land capability classes 5, 6, and 7 include land suitable for urbanization and other uses.