City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Ski Run Business Improvement District to Levy Assessment for Business License Year 2024/2025
Location: Ski Run Blvd
Responsible Staff Member: Ben Hannah, Accountant II (530) 542-6079 Background: On November 19, 2002, City Council formed the Ski Run Business Improvement District (SRBID) by adopting Resolution No. 2002-71. The Ski Run BID was formed under the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, which is codified at California Streets & Highways Code 36500-36551. This Staff Report has been composed in accordance with Streets & Highways Code 36533 to satisfy the annual requirements for the Ski Run BID.
Issue and Discussion: This item completes the second step of the two step process listed below as required by Streets & Highways Code section 36535. Step 1, required by Streets & Highways Code sections 36533-36534, was completed on March 12, 2024 and a public hearing was scheduled for May 7, 2024.
Step 1: Every year the Ski Run BID Advisory Board is required to submit an Annual Report and proposed budget for approval to the City Council (City Ordinance No. 927, Section 2.9). The Council then adopts a “Resolution of Intention”, which indicates the Council’s intention to levy an assessment to the BID members and sets a time and place of a future Public Hearing whereby members of the BID can provide written protests on the content of the Report for the upcoming fiscal year.
Step 2: The City Council must hold a public hearing and shall consider all protests from business owners within the Ski Run Business Improvement District, received either in writing and submitted to the City Clerk prior to the Public Hearing or presented orally at the Public Hearing. If a majority of businesses (based on their BID assessment) do not provide written protests, the Council may adopt a new Resolution confirming the report as originally filed or as changed. This will allow the Finance department to include the BID assessments with the annual business license renewal billing beginning in May for the 2024/2025 business tax year.
Annual Assessments:
1. There are no changes to the boundaries or areas of benefit in the area.
2. The method of assessment for 2024/2025 remains the same as in previous years and is as follows:
a. 25% of the annual Business and Professions Tax and, if applicable 331
Council Agenda Report- May 7, 2024
b. $2.00 per lineal foot of property frontage on Ski Run Blvd, if the property is owned by a business license holder.
Revenues: The Ski Run BID receives operating revenues from the annual assessments estimated to be $13,000 for business license year 2024/2025 which is $1,500 higher than the projection for the previous year 2023/2024. Actual business license year 2023/2024 revenues were $2,700 higher than previous projections. The next year’s projections assume that revenues will be higher than 2023/2024 projections but lower than 2023/2024 actuals due to higher business revenues combined with projected delinquent collections.
Expenses: BID assessments will continue to be used for the allowable expenses of landscape maintenance which includes lawn care, water, and electricity. The City Public Works Department performs lawn care maintenance for six months beginning May 1st and ending October 31st.
Activities include sprinkler repair, aerating, fertilizing, mowing, clean-up, and debris removal.
Historically, the assessments have not been adequate to fully cover these costs, which would be the case for year 2024/2025 as well.
The proposed budget is based on last year’s actual revenues and expenses. It reflects a projected shortfall of $11,000 compared to $11,500 approved for the prior year General Fund subsidy. While utility costs remained similar, both landscaping costs and assessment revenues increased with the expenses continuing to exceed BID revenues requiring an ongoing General Fund subsidy.
Financial Implications: The proposed 2024/2025 Ski Run Landscaping (fund 280) Funding Plan is attached and will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2024/2025 City budget. The plan includes the BID assessment funded portion for landscaping and maintenance and the City General fund portion from the Parks Department for landscaping and maintenance.
For fiscal year 2024/2025, staff recommends budgeting $11,000 to be transferred in from the General Fund in order to reflect a true cost and achieve a balanced budget for the Ski Run Business Improvement District.
Environmental Considerations: This is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) (organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).
Policy Implications: Consistent with the California laws and City policies. 332
Resolution 2024-XXX May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2024-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 7, 2024
Confirming the Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Report and Levying the Assessment Referred to in the Report for Business License Year 2024-2025
BACKGROUND
A. On March 12, 2024 the South Lake Tahoe City Council adopted a resolution of Intent to Levy assessments within the Ski Run Business Improvement District as required by California Streets & Highways code sections 36533-36534.
B. On May 7, 2024, the City Council held a public hearing as required by California Streets & Highways code section 36525 where they considered evidence and testimony submitted at that public hearing.
C. The City Council did not receive written or oral protests against the levy of assessments submitted by payers of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total assessments of the entire district. Therefore, the City Council has determined that action is necessary and appropriate to ensure continuation of the district.
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:
1. Finds that the recitals set forth herein are true and correct.
2. Confirms the report submitted by the Ski Run BID advisory board as originally filed. A true and correct copy of that report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3. Adopts the 2024-2025 budget submitted by the Ski Run BID Advisory Board as originally filed on March 12, 2024
4. Declares that the adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of the Ski Run BID assessments at the rates specified in the report for the fiscal year specified in the report.
5. Declares that this Resolution is effective on its adoption. 333
Resolution 2024-XXX May 7, 2024 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 7, 2024 by the following vote:
Yes:
No:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
334
BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment 13,000 $
Total Revenue 13,000 $
BID Operating Expenses
Water/Sewer Utilities 6,000 $
Landscaping 15,500 $
Electricity for Timers 2,500 $
Total Expenses 24,000 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (11,000) $
Other Revenue Funding Sources
General Fund Subsidy $ 11,000
Ski Run BID Fund Balance $ ‐
Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) ** $ ‐
Provided for reference only. The above budget will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2024/2025 City budget.
BID Projected Budget FY 2024/2025
FUND 280 ‐ SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Total General Fund Subsidy $11,000
335
BID Operating Revenue BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment 11,500 $ BID Assessment 13,000 $
Total Revenue $ 11,500 Total Revenue $ 13,000
BID Operating Expenses BID Operating Expenses
Water/Sewer Utilities 6,000 $ Water/Sewer Utilities 6,000 $Landscaping 14,500 $ Landscaping 15,500 $ Electricity for Timers $ 2,500 Electricity for Timers $ 2,500 Total Expenses 23,000 $ Total Expenses 24,000 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (11,500) $ BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (11,000) $ Other Revenue Funding Sources Other Revenue Funding Sources General Fund Subsidy 11,500 $ General Fund Subsidy 11,000 $ Ski Run BID Fund Balance $ ‐ Ski Run BID Fund Balance $ ‐ Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $ ‐ Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $ ‐Provided for reference only. Provided for reference only. The above budget will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2024/2025 City budget.
BID Adopted Budget FY 2023/2024
Total General Fund Subsidy $11,500
BID Projected Budget FY 2024/2025
Total General Fund Subsidy $11,000
Ski Run Landscaping and Bike Trail Maintenance Funding Plan 2023/2024 Adopted Budget and 2024/2025 Projected Budget Administered and Accounted for by City
FUND 280 ‐ SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND 280 ‐ SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 336
BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment
Total Revenue 13,000 $
BID Operating Expenses
Landscaping $ 15,500
Water/Sewer Utilities $ 6,000
Electricity for Timers $ 2,500
Total Expenses 24,000 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (11,000) $
Other Revenue Funding Sources
General Fund Subsidy $ 11,000
Ski Run BID Fund Balance $ ‐
Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $ ‐
Measure S Operating Revenue
STAR Ballot Measure (Fund 281) $ 10,000
Total Revenue 10,000 $
Measure S Operating Expenses
Employee Compensation $ 11,045
Technical Services $ 4,800
Snow Removal $ ‐
Sand and Snow Poles $ 8,625
Electricity for Lights $ 5,800
Total Expenses 30,270 $
Measure S Net Operating Revenue/(Expenses) (20,270) $
Provided for reference only.
Note: Fund 281 Deficit is covered by prior year fund balance.
BID Projected Budget FY 2024‐2025
FUND 280 ‐ SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FUND 281 ‐ MEASURE S RECREATION SKI RUN BIKE TRAIL
Total General Fund Subsidy $11,000
337
February 20, 2024
Ben Hannah
Accountant II
City of South Lake Tahoe
Subject: 2024 Ski Run BID Report
Dear Mr. Hannah,
Accomplishments
The Ski Run Business Improvement District Board and contributing members have continued to work with the City of South Lake Tahoe on measures to reduce maintenance costs and improve pedestrian safety. Conversations have taken place,
● The BID continues to support the completion of Ski Run Park, which is being built on the empty lot at 1195 Ski Run, with an estimated completion time of this summer. The park will feature a climbing boulder, an iconic rope structure, swings, benches, and many natural features. The community around the park site has been engaged in park design and fundraising.
Advocacy and Change
BID Members call for the following to help make Ski Run a distinct district in the City that is a vibrant place to gather and live.
● A unified vision plan to encourage mixed-use redevelopment, year-round businesses, and a more diverse mix of housing options to the street. In 2023, the City solicited feedback from Ski Run businesses, and we are hopeful there will be more regulation changes to encourage small businesses to come to Ski Run.
Relaxation on parking requirements and more flexibility for outdoor dining would be especially helpful.
We are submitting separately a letter from the Friends of Ski Run (501c3) that covers the accomplishments and goals of that organization’s members to create events and vibrancy to the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Chris McNamara, President
Corey Rich, Vice President
Devin Middlebrook, Treasurer
Jeff Cowen
Rachel Carlson
338
February 20, 2024
Ben Hannah
Accountant II
City of South Lake Tahoe
Subject: 2024 Friends of Ski Run Report
Dear Mr. Hannah,
FoSR holds a special use permit that it used to help facilitate the following in 2024:
● The weekly Ski Run Farmers Market was run by Bridjet Orr. The market entered its 16th season in 2023 and continues to be a hallmark event, held every Friday from 3-8 pm through the summer. Last year, the farmers market doubled in size on two blocks.
● The Ski Run Presents: speaker series continues to bring interesting and enlightening speakers to various businesses on Ski Run. Shows are either free or ticket sales go to various charities. ● The third annual Longest Table Dinner had over 600 participants. All proceeds went to the South Shore YEA! Camps to provide free camps to the local community. ● Tahoe BrewFest returned to Ski Run and raised money for the Boys and Girls Club. The event used the street for three blocks on Ski Run and brought hundreds of participants and great energy to the street.
All of these events and hopefully more should return to the street in 2024 FoSR thanks the City for the partnership spurred by creating the Ski Run Business Improvement District. Ski Run has a vibrant future. We will work side-by-side with the City to bring more fun, options, and safety to the area.
Sincerely,
Chris McNamara, President
Corey Rich, Vice President
Devin Middlebrook, Treasurer
Jeff Cowen
Rachel Carlson
339
Ski Run BID Notice of Intent - Page 1 of 2
FILER
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY
CLERK
[email protected]
(530) 542-6005
FILING FOR
Tahoe Daily
Tribune
Columns Wide: 3
Total Column Inches: 34.93
Number of Lines: 117
Ad
Class:
Legals
INTERIM AD DRAFT
This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run in Tahoe Daily Tribune on the dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at (530) 541-3880.
Notice ID: zadIH3ww4uEf1SNnVJze | Proof Updated: Mar. 14, 2024 at 11:23am PDT Notice Name: Ski Run BID Notice of Intent
This is not an invoice. Below is an estimated price, and it is subject to change. You will receive an invoice with the final price upon invoice creation by the publisher.
04/19/2024: Other 476.04
Internet Flat Fee Charge 40.00
Affidavit flat charge 10.00
Subtotal $526.04
Tax $0.00
Processing Fee $0.00
Total $526.04
See Proof on Next Page
340
Ski Run BID Notice of Intent - Page 2 of 2
341
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:11
Agenda Item: Motel 6 and Sunray Motel Update
Executive Summary: The existing structures located at 2375 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (Motel 6) and 2659 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (Sunray Motel) are currently vacant. The California Tahoe Conservancy has purchased the Motel 6 property for a restoration project. Sunray Motel has been vacant and subject to ongoing administrative citations and penalties for creating a public nuisance since March 2022. At the City Council meeting on November 11, 2023, Councilmember Robbins (seconded by Councilmember Creegan) requested that staff provide an update regarding the current status of these properties and to discuss their potential as housing.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive and File.
Responsible Staff Member: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Rep[ort Motel 6 and Sunray
02 - 2659 Lake Tahoe Blvd Non Compliance Letter Jan 2024.pdf 03- Public Comment Jinkens.pdf
342
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Motel 6 and Sunray Motel Update
Location: 2375 and 2659 Lake Tahoe Boulevard
Responsible Staff Member: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Background: This report serves to provide an update as the status of the Motel 6 and Sunray Motel properties as requested by a motion made by Councilmember Robbins and seconded by Councilmember Creegan:
Motel 6
The California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC) voted to acquire the 31-acre Motel 6 property in November 2021 for the purpose of restoring the environmentally sensitive land, but the property subsequently became the subject of a civil lawsuit in El Dorado County Superior Court, Helen Elizabeth Johnson v. Mary Anne McCall, Case No. 21CV0173. An order was issued by the court on March 18, 2024, approving the sale of the property to the CTC for $15,400,000 paid in cash. The CTC received grant funds from other resource agencies and nonprofit organizations to purchase this property, including the California Wildlife Conservation Board, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Tahoe Fund, and League to Save Lake Tahoe. The purchase was completed on March 29th. The sale process of this privately-owned parcel was managed and mandated by the Superior Court pursuant to state law.
The CTC intends to demolish the Motel 6 and Carrows buildings and restore the property as part of the Upper Truckee River watershed. To date, the CTC has not submitted plans for demolition or habitat restoration to the Development Service Department.
The City and the CTC are in communication regarding City code requirements associated with the now-vacant structures as well as the demolition process. Furthermore, there have been early staff-level discussions of entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the purposes of outlining details associated with the following topics:
Timing of building demolition and site restoration
Code requirements associated with abandoned buildings Potential use of structure for emergency personnel training purposes prior to demolition
Future use of Tourist Accommodation Units associated with the property 343
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 2 of 3
Sunray Motel
Following an inspection of 2659 Lake Tahoe Boulevard property on March 8, 2022, a Notice and Order to Repair or Abate (notice) was issued. The City Building Official determined that the property contains unlawful conditions that constitute a public nuisance, and which pose a substantial danger to the health, safety, and general welfare of the occupants, the surrounding community, and the public. These unlawful conditions were found to be in violation of multiple provisions of law, including, but not limited to, the California Health and Safety Code, the California Building Standards Code codified in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, the California Building Code, the California Fire Code, the California Electrical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Mechanical Code, the International Property Maintenance Code and the South Lake Tahoe Code.
Seven inspections were conducted in 2022 between April and September, resulting in a total of $25,032.00 in administrative fines issues to the property owner. On September 20, 2022, City staff determined that the property was vacant and boarded up in order to abate previously cited substandard housing conditions. As of September 2022 the property continues to be subject to the requirements of City Code Chapter 4.65 Nuisances Consisting of Abandoned or Substantially Damaged Swelling Structures.
Pursuant to the above city ordinance, the property remains non-compliant. The fifth compliance deadline of January 24, 2024 has passed, and the current administrative penalties are listed on Attachment 2. The total outstanding fees due at the property is $46,032.00 and the sixth compliance deadline is April 24, 2024.
Issue and Discussion: The Sunray Motel continues to be a nuisance due to abandonment and substantial damage to the property. City staff continue working on mitigating the nuisance with the current city code and other regulatory codes.
Staff understands that the Sunray Motel is currently in escrow. Specific details of the escrow are unknown except that the closing date has yet to be finalized. This property is also subject to a lawsuit between the property owner and prospective buyer for a breach of contract (Sep Hines as Trustee of the Sep Hines Revocable Living Trust v. Yan Jiang et al., El Dorado County Superior Court Case No. 23CV1101).
Neither property is a viable site for a city-initiated housing project. The Motel 6 property is not for sale and the CTC has purchased it for a restoration project, specifically for the purpose of reconnecting the wetland that filters water flowing into Lake Tahoe. The CTC has publicly stated its plans to transfer the property’s development rights and coverage for future use on town center redevelopment. As stated above, City staff has been in preliminary discussions with CTC staff about the future use of these commodities and any MOU negotiated with the CTC would return to Council for approval.
The Sunray property is in a dilapidated condition and the structures appear to have reached the end of their useful life. The City does not have funds to purchase and redevelop the property for housing at this time. Should the sale to a new owner close, City staff will work with the new owner to address the code violations on the property and expedite redevelopment to get the property back into use. It is important to note that this property is within the proposed Mid-Town Area Plan boundary and its potential uses and redevelopment potential could be influenced by that planning process which is about to begin. 344
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 3 of 3
Financial Implications: This report does not have financial implications.
Environmental Considerations: This is not a project under CEQA, because it does not involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15378(b)(2) and 15378(b)(4) and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
Policy Implications: City Strategic Plan Priority 1 includes the goal of minimizing the impact our built environment has on Lake Tahoe.
345
Development Services Department
CITYOFSLT.US / (530) 542-6010
1052 Tata Lane South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
January 25, 2024
Certified Mail: 7022 2410 0001 9431 0532
Fragranice Inc. CA Corp.
2659 Lake Tahoe Blvd.
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7700
Subject: Board Up and Property Maintenance Code Violations Location: 2659 Lake Tahoe Blvd. South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Assessor’s Parcel Number: 031-257-007-000
Dear Property Owner:
Following an inspection of the above referenced property on March 8, 2022, a Notice and Order to Repair or Abate (Notice) was issued. The Notice informed you of a determination by the City Building Official that the parcel of real property located at the address and Assessor's Parcel Number identified above ("Subject Property") contains unlawful conditions that constitute a public nuisance, and which pose a substantial danger to the health, safety, and general welfare of the occupants, the surrounding community, and the public. These unlawful conditions were found to be in violation of multiple provisions of law, including, but not limited to, the California Health and Safety Code, the California Building Standards Code codified in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, the California Building Code, the California Fire Code, the California Electrical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Mechanical Code, the International Property Maintenance Code and the South Lake Tahoe City Code as adopted by the City. A 30-day compliance deadline, which expired on April 11, 2022, was provided to address all documented violations.
Pursuant to the above referenced Notice, follow up inspections were conducted on April 13, 2022, May 9, 2022, May 16, 2022, May 24, 2022, June 15, 2022, August 26, 2022, and September 16, 2022, resulting in a total of $25,032.00 in administrative fines issued to the property owner to date.
During a follow up inspection conducted on Tuesday, September 20, 2022, City staff determined that the property was vacant and boarded up in order to abate previously cited substandard housing conditions. However, there remains previously cited violations and conditions that constitute a public nuisance, and which pose a substantial danger to the health, safety, and general welfare of the surrounding community, and the public. The above referenced property is now subject to the requirements of City Code Chapter 4.65.
346
Development Services Department
CITYOFSLT.US / (530) 542-6010
1052 Tata Lane South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Chapter 4.65. Nuisances Consisting of Abandoned or Substantially Damaged Dwelling Structures. The City Code requires that boarded buildings be rehabilitated for occupancy within 90 days after written notification by the City.
The City Code further states:
No person shall allow a building designed for human use or occupancy to stand vacant for more than 90 days, unless one of the following applies:
1. The building is the subject of an active building permit for repair or rehabilitation and the owner is progressing diligently to complete the repair or rehabilitation.
2. The building meets all codes, does not contribute to blight, is ready for occupancy, and is actively being offered for sale, lease, rent, or used as a second home.
3. The code enforcement officer or his/her designee determines that the building does not contribute to and is not likely to contribute to blight because the owner is actively maintaining and monitoring the building so that it does not contribute to blight. Active maintenance and monitoring shall include:
a. Maintenance of landscaping and plant materials in good condition. b. Maintenance of the exterior of the building, including but not limited to paint and finishes, in good condition.
c. Regular removal of all exterior trash, debris, and graffiti. d. Maintenance of the building in continuing compliance with all applicable codes and regulations.
e. Prevention of criminal activity on the premises, including but not limited to use and sale of controlled substances, prostitution, and criminal street gang activity.
Any owner of a boarded building which remains boarded in violation of this section, or any owner of a building which remains vacant in violation of this section, shall be liable for an administrative penalty in the amount of $1,000 per building for the first violation. A second or subsequent administrative penalty shall be imposed upon any owner pursuant to this chapter if the building remains in violation of this chapter 90 days following the imposition of the first administrative penalty. Additional penalties may be imposed in each 90-day period following the imposition of an administrative penalty under this chapter. Additional penalties may be imposed so long as the violations continue. A second and any subsequent penalty shall be in the amount of $5,000. (Ord. 879 § 1).
347
Development Services Department
CITYOFSLT.US / (530) 542-6010
1052 Tata Lane South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Pursuant to the above city ordinance (Ord. 879 § 1). The fourth compliance deadline of January 24,2024, has past, and the property remains non-compliant.
An additional board up administrative penalty of $5000.00 has been assessed.
Administrative substandard housing fees = $25,032.00
Administrative board up penalty fee = $1000.00
Second Administrative board up penalty fee = $5000.00
Third Administrative board up penalty fee = $5000.00
Fourth Administrative board up penalty fee = $5000.00
Fifth Administrative board up penalty fee = $5000.00
Total outstanding fees now due = 46,032.00
This letter is sent as a notification to ensure that you are aware of these City ordinances. To avoid escalated enforcement, plans submittal and building permits must be obtained from the City of South Lake Tahoe by the sixth compliance deadline, or sooner.
The sixth compliance deadline is: April 24, 2024.
Sincerely,
Zachary Thomas
Director of Development Services
348
P.O. BOX 8066 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 96158
SENT VIA ELECTRONIC AND REGULAR MAIL
April 20, 2024
Mayor Cody Bass and Council Members
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, California 96150
Re: City Council Agenda Item, 18, Motel 6 and Sunray Motel Update Dear Mayor Bass and Council Members:
Thank you for bringing these items up before the City Council for review and public discussion. Both matters deserve your careful review and the opportunity for public comment.
Motel 6 Demolition
The Motel 6 demolition is a policy travesty. For many months concerned locals have expressed support for environmental improvements to the area and the preservation of affordable housing that the motel provides (and could provide). As I have mentioned State law and the City’s adopted General Plan encourages cities to preserve existing affordable housing. To date CTC officials have failed to give any consideration to the impact of demolition on the availability of affordable housing and State housing officials have so far remained silent on the matter. I recently asked State officials to intervene and help us with this matter.
If CTC wishes to proceed with demolition of the property, a travesty in itself, and obtain City permission for doing the demolition, in my experience I recommend that a few things should happen:
1. CTC should be required to fund the total replacement of the lost 74 units under and agreement with the City and State HousingDepartment whereby the new units would be made available on a priority basis to existing working City residents and seniors in need under a public/private partnership.
2. The CTC should be required to convey the land allocations for the project relocation.
3. The CTC will guarantee that the vacant site shall be maintained in a fire safe condition annually to standards set by the Fire Department.
4. The CTC and State of California should agree to pay the City an in lieu of taxes fee for the loss of property tax revenue by CTC acquiring the property. 349
Should the CTC fail to agree to the terms for demolition, the City of South Lake Tahoe should not authorize said demolition because CTC will not have mitigated the loss of affordable housing units.
Given the City Council’s high priority of meeting the housing needs of existing working residents and seniors in need, the preservation of existing affordable housing or its complete replacement should be a high priority. In addition, those community members who are advocating new funding sources for affordable housing should support preserving the existing Motel 6 for affordable housing or requiring total replacement of demolished units. Frankly, rehabilitating the existing site for affordable housing is far cheaper than building new housing, but this is the choice the CTC must be made to make.
I suggest, as well, that tearing down existing affordable housing and entering into a development MOU could be a basis for triggering CEQA review, analysis, and options. The conversion of land in this instance is a major development or “undevelopment” undertaking of significant environmental and policy consequence.
The Sunray Motel
The existing dilapidated Sunray Motel is a blight on the neighborhood and community and owners of the property should be given notice to repair the property to a useable condition and enter into a development agreement to do so within a given timeframe or be ordered to remove the blighting conditions. The existing motel is a distraction from existing businesses in the area.
Respectfully,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
David Jinkens, MPA
Good Government Advocate
(Retired South Lake Tahoe City Manager, and RDA Executive Director)) C: City Manager
City Clerk
Interested parties.
“SI, PODEMOS”
350
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:12
Agenda Item: Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement with NDC Lake Tahoe LLC for the 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard Affordable Housing Project Executive Summary: The project developers have requested a loan for City-approved predevelopment costs for the affordable housing project at 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd. This loan will be funded by one or a combination of three sources: 1) Workforce Development Account; 2) Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA); or 3) Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP). The City Council is being requested to authorize the City Manager to enter into the Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement with NDC Lake Tahoe LLC for 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard affordable housing project for an amount not to exceed $564,073.
Responsible Staff Member: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Housing Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - Novin Predevelopment Loan.docx
02 - Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement.pdf
351
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement for the 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard Affordable Housing Project
Location: 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (APNs: 029-170-01 and 029-170-02) Responsible Staff Member: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Housing Manager Background: On November 7, 2023, following the required process for disposing of surplus property in the Surplus Lands Act, the City and South Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency entered into a purchase and sale agreement (PSA) with Novin Development Corp. for 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (APNs 029-170-01 and 029-170-02). On December 15, 2023, the Countywide Oversight Board approved the PSA. In accordance with the terms of the PSA, the Successor Agency transferred the property to the City for $1,000,000 on March 15, 2024. The PSA anticipated a subsequent Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement, which has been negotiated by staff and is now being brought to City Council.
The proposed project will require various amendments to applicable development standards (such as increased density), that are anticipated trough the adoption of the Tourist Core Area Plan Amendments as well as TRPA proposed amendments to their development standards. The project is identified as a 100% mixed-income affordable housing development project which is proposed to consist of a minimum of 75 residential units which would be deed restricted to low and/or moderate-income households for a period of no less than 55 years, as well as community amenities on the ground floor on about 1.16 acres of land.
Issue and Discussion: Novin Development Corp. has created a subsidiary to develop this project, NDC Lake Tahoe LLC, and will be assigning its right to purchase the property to the new entity. The project developers have requested a loan of funds to the project to cover Cityapproved predevelopment costs such as site studies and project design. Providing a loan for predevelopment costs will assist in keeping the project design and development on track with the project timeline and provide the leverage for additional funding sources. The Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement is being completed prior to several other grants and loans for the project. The loan amount would be a total of $564,073 using one or a combination of the following three funding sources:
1. Workforce Housing Fund
2. Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) - $564,073
3. Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP) - $500,000
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into the Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement for $564,073 to be used for predevelopment costs associated with this affordable housing project.
352
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 2 of 2
Financial Implications: The approved loan will be funded by one or combination of three options: 1) Workforce Housing Account; 2) Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds for $564,073 – Year 2 and 3 of allocation over 5 years; 3) Prohousing Inventive Program for $500,000 (if awarded).
Environmental Considerations: This action is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) with respect to the affordable housing project at 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard under CEQA Guidelines section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects).
Policy Implications: The recommended action is consistent with the City Strategic Plan which identifies supporting the affordable and/or workforce housing at 3900 Lake Tahoe Blvd. as Action Item 1.3.2.
The recommended action is also consistent with the following adopted policies and programs:
City General Plan Housing Element
Policy 1-1 The City shall adopt programs, ordinances, incentives, land use plans and other regulatory mechanisms that provide opportunities for the private sector to address the housing needs of citizens of all economic levels.
Policy 2-2 The City shall enable opportunities for deed-restricted affordable ownership housing to ensure long-term affordability.
Policy 2-5 The City shall recognize that it will become difficult to attract employees if they cannot afford to purchase or rent housing in South Lake Tahoe. The City shall encourage and support programs and activities that create a robust local economy that provides residents with good paying employment and the means to purchase and/or rent housing in the city. 353
1 PREDEVELOPMENT LOAN AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This PREDEVELOPMENT LOAN AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into effective as of May 7, 2024 (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a municipal corporation (“City” or “Lender”) and NDC LAKE TAHOE, LP, a California limited partnership (“Borrower”).
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to that certain Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated November 7, 2023 (“Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Borrower (or the Borrower’s predecessor Novin Development Corp.), City and South Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency (“Successor Agency”) the City has acquired from the Successor Agency, and Borrower has the right to acquire from the City, approximately 1.16 acres in the City, known as 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 029-170-001 and 029-170-002), as more particularly described in the Purchase Agreement (“Property”). All conditions to effectiveness of the PSA were satisfied by, and the PSA became fully effective, on January 18, 2024.
B. Borrower is seeking to acquire the Property to develop thereon a 100% mixedincome affordable housing development project which is proposed to consist of a minimum of 75 residential units, as well as community amenities on the ground floor (“Project”). As provided in Gov’t Code section 54221(f)(1)(F)(i) and the Declaration of Affordable Housing Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, dated on or about April 18, 2024 and submitted for recording in the Official Records of El Dorado County (“Affordable Housing Covenant”), the Property may be used solely for the development and operation of a rental housing development, which may have ancillary commercial ground floor uses, that restricts 100 percent of the residential units to persons and families of low or moderate income, with at least 75 percent of the assisted residential units restricted to lower income households, as defined in Health and Safety Code section 50079.5, with an affordable rent, as defined in Health and Safety Code section 50052.5, for a minimum of 55 years following completion of the Project, and in no event shall the maximum rent level be higher than 20 percent below the median market rents for the neighborhood in which the Affordable Housing Site is located. “Completion of the project” shall mean the date upon which the last certificate of occupancy for the Project is issued by the City.
C. City has agreed to provide an up to $564,073.00 predevelopment loan (the “Predevelopment Loan”) to Borrower, at a regular interest rate of Three Percent (3%) per annum (the “Interest Rate”) pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein and the Predevelopment Note (as defined below) to pay a portion of the costs (“Predevelopment Costs”) of certain Borrower consultants, contractors, professionals, or suppliers (including Borrower’s architect, “Contractors”) performing Project predevelopment activities including studies, site investigation, feasibility analyses, architectural and engineering services, and preparation of applications for entitlements and construction and permanent financing, as more specifically described in Exhibit A attached hereto (as amended from time to time with City approval, “Predevelopment Work”), as Predevelopment Costs for Predevelopment Work are incurred.
D. The parties intend the Predevelopment Work to be obtained generally in accordance with the schedule contained at Exhibit B attached hereto (as amended from time to time with City approval, “Predevelopment Schedule”).
E. Concurrently herewith Borrower will execute (i) a promissory note in the maximum 354
2 amount of the Predevelopment Loan (as further defined below, “Predevelopment Note”), and (ii) an Assignment of Predevelopment Work (as further defined below, “Assignment Agreement” and together with this Agreement and the Predevelopment Note, the “Loan Documents”) which will provide City with a security interest in the Predevelopment Work, all as provided in this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows.
1. Predevelopment Loan.
(a) Predevelopment Loan and Note. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Predevelopment Note, and so long as no Event of Default exists and is continuing, the City shall make Predevelopment Loan advances to Borrower, provided that the aggregate principal amount of the advances after giving effect to any proposed borrowing shall not exceed $564,073.00 upon the terms and conditions and for the purposes set forth in this Agreement. The Predevelopment Loan shall be evidenced by the Predevelopment Note, which shall be dated as of the Effective Date and executed by Borrower, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C.
(b) Term; Termination Date. Unless otherwise earlier terminated as provided herein, the term of this Agreement shall expire on the date that the right of Borrower or a Borrower assignee permitted by Purchase Agreement Section 30 (“Permitted Assignee”) to purchase the Property from the City terminates under Purchase Agreement Section 27(b) (including permitted extensions, the “Termination Date”). As of the Effective Date, the Termination Date (without regard to potential extensions under the Purchase Agreement) is January 18, 2026. If Borrower exercises its rights to extend the Termination Date under the Purchase Agreement, the Termination Date under this Agreement shall be automatically extended. (c) Rollover Upon Property Purchase. Upon purchase of the Property by Borrower or a Permitted Assignee, the entire outstanding principal balance of the Predevelopment Loan, together with interest accrued thereon, and all other sums due under the Predevelopment Note, shall be “rolled over” into, and included as part of, the principal balance of any new permanent loan the City provides to Borrower or Permitted Assignee as may be reasonably approved by the City and Borrower (or Permitted Assignee) (the “City Permanent Loan”). If no City Permanent Loan is agreed upon, City shall convert the Predevelopment Loan into a new deferred payment loan (payable from Project residual receipts after operating expenses) with a 55-year term, an interest rate not exceeding the lower of (1) the then applicable federal rate for long term loans, (2) the Interest Rate, and such other terms (including security) as may reasonably approved by the City and Borrower (or Permitted Assignee). Upon such a rollover, the Assignment Agreement will terminate.
(d) Termination.
(i) For Default. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon Borrower’s default under this Agreement and failure to cure within the applicable cure periods specified in Section 8(a).
(ii) Mutual Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated with the written consent of both City and Borrower.
355
3 (iii) Inability to Develop Project. The parties acknowledge that as of the Effective Date, the intended Project, specifically a residential housing development with at least 75 units, would not be permitted under applicable land planning regulations (“Planning Regulations”), including (i) the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (“TRPA”)’s Lake Tahoe Regional Plan Area (“Regional Plan”) or (ii) the City’s Tourist Core Area Plan (“TCAP”). (See also Section 7(b).) The parties also acknowledge that as of the Effective Date, there are no assurances that Borrower will be able to obtain sufficient funding for the Project (or any other project on the Property acceptable to the City) by the Termination Date. Therefore, the parties agree that if, on or after January 18, 2026 Borrower or the City reasonably determines that (A) the applicable Planning Regulations are not likely to be amended to permit the proposed Project by the Termination Date (including any extensions thereof), (B) sufficient funding for the Project is not likely to be obtained, or (C) the assumptions and terms set forth in Section 7 cannot be satisfied or have materially changed, then either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement with ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party. (iv) Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section 1(d), City shall be entitled to do either or both of the following: (i) decline any further request for distribution of the Predevelopment Loan; and (ii) exercise its rights under the Assignment Agreement, in which event Borrower shall promptly convey to City all Predevelopment Work in its then-current form, in full and complete satisfaction of any and all of Borrower’s obligations and liabilities to the City under the Predevelopment Loan. (e) Security for the Predevelopment Loan; Nonrecourse.
(i) The Predevelopment Note shall be secured by the assignment to City of Borrower’s interests in and rights to any and all Predevelopment Work financed in whole or in part with the Predevelopment Loan pursuant to an Agreement of Predevelopment Work that Borrower shall execute substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D (“Assignment Agreement”) and deliver to City concurrently with the execution of this Agreement. (ii) The City agrees that it will not seek to obtain payment from or a personal judgment against Borrower or any member, officer, director or employee thereof for the payment of any amounts due under the Predevelopment Note or under this Agreement following an Event of Default (as defined in Section 8(a)) or other termination of this Agreement, including without limitation Borrower’s inability to develop the Project. The City’s sole recourse for payment of any amounts due under the Predevelopment Note or this Agreement will be limited to the exercise of the City’s rights under the Assignment Agreement; provided, however, that this Subsection (ii) does not limit in any way the City’s right to recover losses incurred by the City as a result of Borrower’s fraud, willful misrepresentation or misapplication of funds. (f) Use of Predevelopment Loan. The Predevelopment Loan shall be used solely and exclusively for the payment or reimbursement of the eligible, City-approved Predevelopment Costs.
2. General Conditions Precedent to Disbursement of Funds. City’s obligation to disburse the Predevelopment Loan is conditioned upon satisfaction of all of the following conditions:
(a) Borrower’s execution and delivery to the City of this Agreement, the Predevelopment Note and the Assignment Agreement;
356
4 (b) Borrower’s delivery to the City of an executed and completed Consent and Agreement of Contractor, substantially in form attached to the Assignment Agreement as Schedule 1 (“Contractor Consents”), from the following project contractors for which a disbursement is requested: (i) architects, (ii) civil engineers, (iii) surveyors, (iv) landscapers, (v) traffic consultants, and (vi) and any other Project contractor with an expected contract amount exceeding $50,000 (individually and collectively, “Contractor” or “Contractors”), and upon request by the City, Borrower delivery to City of a copy of any requested Contractor contracts and agreements (“Contractor Contracts”);
(c) Borrower’s delivery to the City of evidence of insurance coverage in the form and in such amounts as set forth in the attached Exhibit E; and (d) Borrower’s delivery to the City of certified copies of Borrower’s organizational documents, good standing certificate(s), and corporate resolution(s) approving the execution and delivery of the Loan Documents; and
(e) Such other instruments and documents as Lender may reasonably request.
3. Disbursement of Predevelopment Loan.
(a) Borrower Representations and Warranties with Each Disbursement. Each request by the Borrower for a disbursement under this Agreement: (i) shall constitute the Borrower’s affirmation that the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement remain true and correct in all material respects as of the date of such request; (ii) shall constitute the Borrower’s representation and warranty that the information set forth in each such request and any certification by the Borrower or any other Contractor supplied in connection therewith is true and correct in all material respects and omits no material fact necessary to make the same not misleading; (iii) shall constitute Borrower’s affirmation that the requested disbursement shall not cause Lender to disburse to Borrower in aggregate more than the agreed amount of the Predevelopment Loan; and (iv) shall constitute the Borrower’s affirmation of compliance in all material respects with the covenants contained in this Agreement. (b) Requests for Disbursements. The Predevelopment Loan shall be disbursed as the work to be paid for by the Predevelopment Loan is performed or is completed, or to reimburse Borrower for completed or ongoing work for which Borrower has previously paid.
Borrower shall submit disbursement requests to Lender not more frequently than one time each calendar month. Lender will make a good faith effort to notify Borrower of any deficiencies in a disbursement request within ten (10) calendar days after such request, and to disburse the Predevelopment Loan under each disbursement request within twenty (20) calendar days after the request.
(i) Each request for a disbursement shall be made to the Lender in writing, and disbursements shall not be requested more frequently than monthly. Each request for disbursement shall be funded within twenty (20) days after it has been properly submitted and when conditions on advances under Section 2 have been satisfied. Each request for a disbursement must contain the following:
(I) a letter from Borrower requesting a disbursement, which should contain any special funding instructions and an executed Certification of Request for Payment of Predevelopment Costs in a form attached hereto as Exhibit F; 357
5 (II) Borrower’s certification that it is in compliance with the latest approved Predevelopment Schedule or, if not, a certification that it is in compliance with the latest approved Predevelopment Schedule except for specifically identified items, together with a reasonable explanation of (x) the reasons for each excepted item and (y) for those items within Borrower’s reasonable control, an explanation of how and when Borrower expects the item to be back on schedule or completed, as applicable.
(III) as requested by Lender, invoices, cancelled checks, and any additional supporting documentation for Predevelopment Costs previously paid by Lender and invoices and supporting documentation for the current disbursement request; and (IV) such other certificates, documents, information, or instruments the Lender shall reasonably require to substantiate the same. (c) Disbursements Contingent on Lender’s Satisfaction. Lender shall not be obligated to make any disbursements unless Lender is satisfied in its reasonable judgment that the conditions precedent to the making of such disbursements, have been satisfied by the Borrower, this disbursement shall not cause Lender to disburse more than the agreed amount of the Predevelopment Loan, and Borrower is in compliance with its obligations under the Loan Documents (including without limitation the Development Schedule and all Predevelopment Schedule updates).
(d) Lender’s Right to Withhold Disbursements. Lender shall have the right to withhold disbursements, in whole or in part, if: (i) Predevelopment Work is in any material respect not in accordance with the Loan Documents; (ii) any contractor’s or mechanic’s lien, laborer’s lien, notice of contract or other like instrument or claim relating to the Predevelopment Work has been recorded or filed (and/or Lender has received notice of the same), such lien or claim is not promptly discharged of record, and such lien or claim is not a result of Lender’s failure to disburse the Predevelopment Loan in a timely manner; or (iii) Borrower is in default (after any applicable notice and cure period) under any obligations to the Lender under the Loan Documents. (e) No Obligation to Disburse Proceeds Upon Default or Termination.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation to disburse any portion of the Predevelopment Loan to Borrower following:
(i) the failure of any of Borrower’s representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement to be true and correct in all material respects; (ii) termination of this Agreement by either mutual agreement of the parties, or by the City pursuant to Section 1(d)(iii); or (iii) the occurrence and continuance of an Event of Default under this Agreement, the Predevelopment Note, or the Assignment Agreement. (f) [already in (d) above]
4. General Borrower Development and Reporting Obligations. (a) General. Until the termination of this Agreement, Borrower shall use commercially reasonably diligent efforts, to obtain all required approvals and financing it deems necessary for the Project, at its sole cost and expense except as provided in this Agreement. 358
6 (b) Reporting Obligations. At least quarterly, or at such other times as City may reasonably request, Borrower shall provide Lender with a written report including the following:
(i) Status of all obtaining all required Project approvals. (ii) Status of obtaining all required Project financing. (iii) Updated Predevelopment Schedule, identifying all then-completed tasks, and proposed amendments (if any).
(iv) Such other Project-related matters as City and Borrower may agree.
5. Equal Opportunity; Non-Discrimination.
(a) Equal Opportunity. There shall be no discrimination on account of any basis listed in subdivision (a) or (d) of Section 12955 of the Government Code, as those bases are defined in Sections 12926, 12926.1, subdivision (m) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section 12955, and Section 12955.2 of the Government Code in the hiring, firing, promoting or demoting of any person engaged in predevelopment or construction work related to the Project, and Borrower shall direct its Contractors to refrain from discrimination on such basis.
6. Additional Covenants, Representations and Warranties of Borrower. (a) Representations of Borrower. Borrower represents and warrants to the City as follows:
(i) Organization of Borrower. Borrower is a duly limited partnership, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California. Borrower has all requisite power and authority to acquire the Property, to develop, own and operate the Project, to carry on its business as now conducted, and to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement, the Predevelopment Note, and the Assignment Agreement. (ii) Authorization of the Predevelopment Loan; No Violation. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, the Predevelopment Note, and the Assignment Agreement have been duly authorized by Borrower, and this Agreement, the Predevelopment Note, and the Assignment Agreement, when duly executed and delivered, will constitute the valid and binding obligations of Borrower enforceable in accordance with their respective terms. Borrower’s execution of this Agreement, the Predevelopment Note, and the Assignment Agreement and performance thereunder will not result in a breach of or constitute a default under any agreement, indenture or other instrument to which Borrower is a party or by which Borrower may be bound. The persons executing the Predevelopment Note, this Agreement, and the Assignment Agreement on behalf of Borrower have been duly authorized to do so.
(iii) Litigation; Bankruptcy. There are no pending or, to Borrower’s knowledge, threatened actions or proceedings before any court or administrative agency which may adversely affect the financial condition or operation of Borrower or any of its members or managers or Borrower’s ability to carry out the obligations of Borrower under this Agreement.
Borrower is not the subject of any action under federal or state Bankruptcy Law. (b) Indemnification. Borrower shall indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by City), and hold the City, and its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, 359
7 and representatives (all of the foregoing, collectively, “Indemnitees”) harmless from and against all losses, damages, fines, deficiencies, penalties, claims, demands, suits, actions, causes of action, legal or administrative proceedings, judgments, costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs) or liabilities of any kind (all of the foregoing, collectively “Claims”) arising directly or indirectly in any manner in connection with or resulting from (i) any and all predevelopment, development or construction activities conducted in connection with the Property or the Project, including without limitation, site investigations conducted by or for Borrower, (ii) any failure of any of Borrower’s representations or warranties set forth in this Agreement, or made by Borrower in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement or in any certificate furnished pursuant hereto, or in connection with any request for disbursement of the Predevelopment Loan to be correct in all material respects, (iii) any Claim, whether meritorious or not, brought or asserted against any Indemnitee which relates to or arises in connection with the Predevelopment Loan, the Predevelopment Note, the Assignment Agreement, or any transaction contemplated thereby, or the relationship between Borrower and City. Borrower’s obligations under this Section shall survive the making and repayment of the Predevelopment Loan and the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Borrower’s indemnity obligations shall not apply to Claims (1) to the extent arising as a result of the willful misconduct or gross negligence of the Indemnitees, or (2) arising from events occurring on or after the Termination Date if City has exercised its rights under the Assignment Agreement and taken ownership and liability of any Contractor Contract.
(c) Insurance. Borrower shall maintain and keep in force, at Borrower’s expense, the insurance coverage set forth in Exhibit E. For each of Borrower’s insurance policies, Borrower shall provide to City within ten days following execution of this Agreement, but in no event later than the initial disbursement of the Predevelopment Loan, a certificate of insurance and an endorsement which provides that no cancellation, major change in coverage or expiration will be effective during the term of this Agreement without 30 days written notice to the City prior to the effective date of such cancellation, change in coverage or expiration. Upon request by the City from time to time, Borrower shall deliver to the City originals or copies of all such insurance policies and certificates evidencing such policies.
(d) Books and Records. The City shall have the right, during business hours and after reasonable notice to Borrower, to inspect and copy Borrower’s books and records concerning the Property, the Project and the use of the Predevelopment Loan. (e) Funder Obligations. The Borrower will comply with any commercially reasonable requirement of any provider of Predevelopment Loan funds to the City (such as, for example, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”)) that the City may provide to the Borrower.
(f) Other Documents. Upon City’s reasonable request, Borrower shall deliver to the City copies of documents related to the Project, including without limitation, construction contracts, consulting agreements, architects’ agreements, loan and financing applications, studies, reports, loan documents, management plans, and property management agreements.
7. Other Development Matters.
(a) The parties are entering into this Agreement based on, among others, the following Project assumptions:
(i) Prevailing wages will likely be required.
360
8 (ii) Average income will be less than 60% AMI for assisted units. (iii) A parking management plan will be required in order to provide a parking ratio of at or below 1:1 (parking to units)
(iv) The development program assumes the primary funding sources are 4% or 9% LIHTC and bonds and that additional local, state and/or federal subsidies will be required.
(v) The final Project design must be approved by the appropriate planning agencies (City and TRPA).
(b) Additionally, Borrower and City acknowledge the current zoning (TSC-MU) per the Tourist Core Area Plan (“TCPA”) allows a maximum of 32 units to be developed on the Site, with a maximum allowable height of 56’ and up to 70% lot coverage. City and Borrower will work together with the TRPA in an effort to increase the allowable density and height through an amendment to the Area Plan or other permissible means, but City gives no assurances as to the type (if any) commitments the City could or would make to achieve acceptable Project density and height, or whether any efforts to achieve those goals would succeed. (c) Borrower and City agree that the precise affordability levels, the site plan, unit count, and any public improvements may be revised as agreed to by Borrower and City over time in order to meet the needs of the community and to create a successful and feasible Project. (d) City makes no commitments on the amount of permanent financing City will be able to make, other than the Predevelopment Loan and any rollover of same set forth in Section 1(c). City acknowledges that Borrower has requested up to a maximum $100,000 per unit permanent gap financing at a 3% residual receipts interest rate and 55 year term, on terms to be negotiated in good faith.
8. Default and Remedies.
(a) Events of Default. The occurrence of any one or more of the following events shall constitute an event of default hereunder (“Event of Default”):
(i) An Event of Default is declared under the Predevelopment Note, the Assignment Agreement, or the Purchase Agreement and remains uncured after 10 days of Borrower’s receipt of notice of such Event of Default.
(ii) Any of Borrower’s representations or warranties contained in the Purchase Agreement or this Agreement, or made by Borrower in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement or in any certificate furnished pursuant hereto, or in connection with any request for disbursement of the Predevelopment Loan shall prove to have been incorrect when made in any material respect.
(iii) Pursuant to or within the meaning of the United States Bankruptcy Code or any other federal or state law relating to insolvency or relief of debtors (“Bankruptcy Law”), Borrower: (i) commences a voluntary case or proceeding; (ii) consents to the entry of an order for relief against Borrower in an involuntary case; (iii) consents to the appointment of a trustee, receiver, assignee, liquidator or similar official for Borrower; (iv) makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or (v) admits in writing its inability to pay its debts as they become due. 361
9 (iv) A court of competent jurisdiction enters an order or decree under any Bankruptcy Law that (i) is for relief against Borrower in an involuntary case, (ii) appoints a trustee, receiver, assignee, liquidator or similar official for Borrower or substantially all of Borrower’s assets, (iii) orders the liquidation of Borrower, or (iv) issues or levies a judgment, writ, warrant of attachment or similar process against the Property or the Project, and in each case the order or decree is not released, vacated, dismissed or fully bonded within 60 days after its issuance.
(v) Borrower fails to maintain insurance as required pursuant to this Agreement, and Borrower fails to cure such default within 10 days. (vi) Borrower fails to use the Predevelopment Loan in accordance with this Agreement or fails to use the Predevelopment Loan in accordance with a Borrower disbursement request.
(vii) Borrower defaults in the performance of any term, provision, covenant or agreement contained in the Purchase Agreement or this Agreement other than an obligation enumerated in this Section 4(a), and unless such a shorter cure period is specified for such default, the default continues for ten (10) days in the event of a monetary default or thirty (30) days in the event of a nonmonetary default after the date upon which City shall have given written notice of the default to Borrower, provided that in the case of a nonmonetary default that is not susceptible of cure within thirty (30) days, an Event of Default shall not arise hereunder if Borrower commences to cure the default within thirty (30) days and thereafter prosecutes the curing of such default to completion with due diligence and in good faith, but in no event longer than 90 days from the receipt of notice of default.
(b) Remedies. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the City shall have the following rights, in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law:
(i) The City may declare the entire outstanding principal balance of the Predevelopment Loan and interest accrued at the default rate specified in the Predevelopment Note immediately due and payable;
(ii) The City may exercise any and all rights and remedies granted to the City pursuant to the Assignment Agreement; and
(iii) The City may terminate this Agreement.
Each of the remedies provided herein is cumulative and not exclusive of, and shall not prejudice any other remedy provided herein, in the Purchase Agreement, the Predevelopment Note, or the Assignment Agreement. The City may exercise any rights and remedies available under applicable law, in addition to, and not in lieu of, any rights and remedies expressly granted in this Agreement.
9. CEQA Savings Clause. To comply with CEQA and give the public the opportunity to be aware of the environmental consequences of the Project, and to fully participate in the CEQA process, the Parties acknowledge that the City has no obligation to approve and Borrower has no obligation to develop the Project unless and until the Parties have negotiated, executed and delivered mutually acceptable agreements based upon information produced from the CEQA environmental review process and any other public review and hearing processes, subject to all 362
10 applicable governmental approvals. City shall retain discretion in accordance with applicable law before action on the Project by the City Council to (i) identify and impose mitigation measures to mitigate significant environmental impacts, if any; (ii) select other feasible alternatives to avoid significant environmental impacts, if any; (iii) balance the benefits of the Project against any significant environmental impacts prior to taking final action if such significant impacts cannot otherwise be avoided; or (iv) determine not to proceed with the Project.
10. Miscellaneous.
(a) Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City’s obligation to make the Predevelopment Loan is personal to Borrower, and this Agreement shall not be assignable by Borrower by operation of law or otherwise absent the express written consent of City, and any such assignment by operation of law or otherwise shall be void.
(b) Notices. All notices, demands, consents, requests or other communications required to or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, addressed to the parties in the manner set forth below, and be given only in accordance with the provisions of this Section 5(b). All such items shall be sent by: personal delivery, in which case notice is effective upon delivery; certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered upon receipt if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt; or nationally recognized overnight courier, with charges prepaid or charged to the sender’s account, in which case notice is effective on delivery if delivery is confirmed by the delivery service (or, if delivery is not during regular business hours on a business day, then on the next business day).
The addresses of the parties to receive notices are as follows:
To City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way,
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joseph Irvin, City Manager
With a copy to: City Attorney
City of South Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
To Borrower: NDC Lake Tahoe LP
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 800
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Attention: Iman Novin
Email: [email protected]
With a copy to: SMR Development LLC,
529 N. Hillview Drive
Boise, ID 83712
Attention: Shellan Rodriguez
Email: [email protected]
363
11 (c) Waiver, Modification and Amendment. No failure or delay on the part of the City in exercising any right, power, or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right, power, or remedy preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power, or remedy hereunder. No modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement, nor any consent to any departure by Borrower therefrom, shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given. No notice to or demand on the Borrower in any case shall entitle the Borrower to any other or further notice or demand in similar or other circumstances. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be effective unless and until such amendment or modification is in writing, properly approved in accordance with applicable procedures, and executed by the parties.
(d) Further Assurances. The parties shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other parties such other documents and instruments, and shall take such other actions, as may reasonably be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement. (e) Parties Not Co-Venturers. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to or shall establish Borrower and City as partners, co-venturers, or principal and agent with one another. (f) Action by the City. Except as may be otherwise specifically provided herein, whenever any approval, notice, direction, or consent by the City is required or permitted under this Agreement, such action shall be in writing, and such action may be given, made or taken by the City’s City Manager or by any person who shall have been designated by the City Manager, without further approval by the City Council unless the City Manager determines in his discretion that such action requires such approval.
(g) Non-Liability of City and City Officials, Employees and Agents. No member, official, employee or agent of the City shall be personally liable to Borrower, or any successor in interest to either in the event of any default or breach by the City, or for any amount of money which may become due to Borrower or any successor to either, or for any obligation of City under this Agreement.
(h) No Third Party Beneficiaries. There shall be no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement.
(i) Captions; Construction; Time is of the Essence. The headings of the sections and paragraphs of this Agreement have been inserted for convenience only and shall not be used to construe this Agreement. The language of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any party. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
(j) Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement, the Predevelopment Note, and the Assignment Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts executed and wholly performed in that State. Borrower agrees that any controversy arising under or in relation to this Agreement, the Predevelopment Note, or the Assignment Agreement shall be litigated exclusively in courts having jurisdiction in El Dorado County, California.
364
12 (k) Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations of the parties are materially altered or abridged by such invalidation, voiding or unenforceability. (l) Entire Agreement; Exhibits. This Agreement, together with the Predevelopment Note, the Assignment Agreement, and the Purchase Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior oral or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. Exhibits A through E attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference. (m) City Status. Borrower recognizes and agrees that City is not a commercial lending institution, but a public agency exercising its authority to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Any duties or obligations which a commercial lending institution may have to Borrower shall not apply to this transaction except as set forth herein or in the Predevelopment Note or as otherwise required by law.
(n) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
365
13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth below.
Borrower: City:
NDC LAKE TAHOE LP
By: NDC Lake Tahoe LLC, a California
limited liability company
Its: General Partner
By: Novin Development Corp., a
California corporation
Its: Sole Member
By:
Name: Iman Novin
Its: President
Date:
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
By:
Name: Cody Bass
Its: Mayor
Date:
ATTEST:
By:
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
366
14 Exhibits
A Predevelopment Costs
B Predevelopment Schedule
C Form of Predevelopment Note
D Form of Assignment Agreement
Schedule 1: Contactor Consent
E Insurance Requirements
F Form of Certification of Request for Payment of Predevelopment Costs 367
15 Exhibit A
PREDEVELOPMENT COSTS
368
Budget Version v1.0
as of date 4/24/2024
PREDEVELOPMENT COST AMOUNT
Acquisition Price $0.00
Acquisition Costs $0.00
Pedevelopment Financing Costs $25,000.00
Architectural, Survey & Engineering $354,073.00
Planning Fees $35,000.00
Third Party Reports $50,000.00
Legal $50,000.00
Accounting, Administration, Consulting $50,000.00
TOTAL PREDEVELOPMENT BUDGET $564,073.00
South Lake Tahoe
Predevelopment Budget
369
16 Exhibit B
PREDEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
370
Budget Version v1.0
as of date 4/24/2024
MILESTONE ESTIMATED DATE
Survey June 2024
City's TCAP Approval from TRPA July 2024
Schematic Design July 2024
Design Approval December 2024
Soft Funding Application(s) 2025-2026
Tax Credit Application(s) 2026
Construction Start 180 Days After Tax Credit Award
South Lake Tahoe
Project Timeline
371
17 Exhibit C
FORM OF PREDEVELOPMENT NOTE
372
1 PREDEVELOPMENT LOAN PROMISSORY NOTE
FOR
3900/3908 LAKE TAHOE BLVD.
$564,073.00 South Lake Tahoe, California
_____________, 202__
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned NDC LAKE TAHOE LP, a California limited partnership (“Maker”) promises to pay to the order of the CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a municipal corporation (“Holder,” or “Lender”), or order, at City of South Lake Tahoe, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 or at such other place as Lender may from time to time designate in writing, the principal sum of Five Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Seventy Three and 00/100 Dollars $564,073.00 or so much thereof as may be advanced and outstanding, in lawful money of the United States.
1. This Note evidences the “Predevelopment Loan” as defined and described in that certain Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement, dated of even date herewith, between Maker and Lender (the “Loan Agreement”). Collectively this Note, the Loan Agreement and associated documents constitute the “Loan Documents.” The principal amount of this Note will be disbursed as contemplated and controlled by the Loan Agreement.
All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Loan Agreement, and the provisions of the Loan Agreement relating to the Predevelopment Loan are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Principal amount of this Note shall bear interest prior to maturity at the Interest Rate. The principal amount of this Note as stated above, or so much thereof as may be advanced and outstanding, shall be due and payable on the earlier of the following (“Maturity Date”):
(a) Termination of the Loan Agreement as provided therein, including without limitation on the Termination Date, for default, or otherwise; and (b) Upon purchase of the Property by Borrower or a Permitted Assignee, as provided in the Loan Agreement.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in the Loan Agreement, if the loan has not been repaid in full by the Maturity Date, then the Lender’s sole recourse shall be limited to any assets assigned to Lender and any additional security granted to Lender under the Loan Documents, including without limitation Borrower’s right, title and interest in and to the Predevelopment Work, and any other documents and work product relating to the Project that have been paid for in whole or in part by the Lender as assigned pursuant to the Assignment of Project Documents. The Lender, in its sole discretion, may accelerate repayment if an Event of Default occurs under any Loan Documents after the expiration of the applicable cure periods therein.
(d) This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time, and from time to time without premium or penalty.
3. It is expressly agreed that time is of the essence in this Note and in the event of:
373
2 (a) any default in the full and punctual payment of all or part of any installment of principal or interest hereunder as and when the same become due and payable; or (b) upon the occurrence of any “Event of Default” under the Loan Agreement and the expiration of any applicable period of grace within which the Maker may cure the same, there shall be an Event of Default under this Note;
then, in any such event, the Holder hereof, at its option, may declare the entire outstanding principal balance hereof, together with all costs, fees, expenses, charges for collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees (which shall include outside counsel fees and all allocated costs of Holder’s in-house counsel), and costs for declaratory relief, arbitration, prosecution or defense of any action related to this Note, to be immediately due and payable in full, without further demand or notice to Maker or to any other party.
4. Failure of the Holder to exercise any rights hereunder with respect to any default shall not excuse such default and shall not constitute the Holder’s waiver of the right to the latter exercise thereof, in the absence of a written agreement to the contrary executed and delivered by the Holder hereof and subsequent to such default.
5. All payments hereunder shall be paid in lawful money of the United States, which, at the time of payment, shall be legal tender for the payment of all debts and dues, public and private.
6. All sums received hereunder shall be applied in the following order: first, upon an Event of Default to costs and expenses of the Lender incurred in connection with the Loan, including costs of collection and reasonable attorney’s fees, second, to interest, and then to principal.
7. Maker, all endorsers and guarantors hereof, and all others who may become liable for all or any part of the indebtedness evidenced hereby: (i) agree to be jointly and severally bound hereby, as primary obligors; (ii) jointly and severally waive and renounce any and all exception rights, including that of homestead, and the benefit of all valuation and appraisement privileges available to them or any of them pursuant to the Constitution or the laws of the United States or of any state, territory or jurisdiction, as against this debt or any renewal or extension thereof; and (iii) jointly and severally waive presentment for payment, demand, notice of protest, and any and all lack of diligence or delays in collection or enforcement hereof or in bringing suit for the collection hereof or in taking any other action hereunder. Maker and all others who may become liable for all or any part of the indebtedness evidenced hereby further agree with the Holder thereof that said Holder may, without notice, in such manner, on such terms and for such times(s) as the Holder may see fit, increase, extend, or renew this Note, and/or release any maker hereof, and/or substitute or add guarantors, and/or substitute or release all or any part of the collateral (real, personal or mixed) securing this Note, all without any way affecting, impairing, limiting, releasing or foregoing the joint and several liability of Maker and all endorsers and guarantors hereof not so released. The foregoing shall in all events be subject to the limitations on recourse set forth in Section 8 hereof.
8. The recourse of the Lender shall be limited as set forth in this Note and the Loan Agreement. It is agreed that the agreements limiting the exercise of remedies against Borrower or any member of Borrower, shall not:
(a) constitute a release, discharge or waiver of the indebtedness evidenced by 374
3 the Note and the indebtedness evidenced by the Note shall continue until satisfied or paid in full; (b) limit or be construed to limit the personal liability of the Borrower or any member, for the performance of the covenants and obligations under the Loan Documents, other than the covenant to personally pay the indebtedness evidenced by the Note; or (c) affect any additional remedies or liens which the Lender has for the indebtedness evidenced by the Note and for the enforcement of any rights which the Lender has under the Loan Documents.
9. Maker hereby represents and warrants to, and covenants with, Lender that the entire proceeds hereof have been or will be used for the purpose of eligible Predevelopment Costs incurred by Maker for the Project pursuant to the Loan Agreement.
10. The rights and obligations created hereunder shall be construed and enforced according to, and shall be governed by, the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts executed and wholly performed in that State.
11. The unenforceability or invalidity of any provision or provisions hereof shall not render any other provision or provisions hereof invalid or unenforceable.
WITNESS the following signatures.
NDC LAKE TAHOE LP
By: NDC Lake Tahoe LLC, a California limited liability company Its: General Partner
By: Novin Development Corp., a California corporation
Its: Sole Member
By:
Name: Iman Novin
Its: President
Date:
375
4 Exhibit D
FORM OF ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
(Attached)
376
1 ASSIGNMENT OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS
3900/3908 LAKE TAHOE BLVD.
THIS ASSIGNMENT OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS (the “Assignment”) is made as of ______________________, 202__ by NDC LAKE TAHOE LP, a California limited partnership (the “Borrower”) in favor of the CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a municipal corporation (the “City” or “Lender”).
WHEREAS, pursuant to terms more specifically described in a loan agreement between Lender and Borrower of even date herewith (the “Loan Agreement”), Lender intends to lend to Borrower up to ____________________________ and 00/100 Dollars ($_____________) (the “Predevelopment Loan”) to cover City-approved and budgeted predevelopment costs (“Predevelopment Costs”) to be paid to certain of Borrower’s consultants, contractors, professionals, or suppliers (including its architect, “Contractors”) for studies, site investigation, feasibility analyses, architectural and engineering services, and preparation of applications for entitlements and construction and permanent financing (the “Predevelopment Work”) related to a potential housing project development at 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd. in South Lake Tahoe, California (as further described in the Loan Agreement, the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the execution and delivery of this Assignment is a condition precedent to the performance by Lender of its obligations under the Loan Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals set forth above and incorporated herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Borrower agrees as follows:
1. Unless expressly defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Loan Agreement.
2. As security for the Predevelopment Loan, Borrower hereby grants, transfers and assigns to Lender, all the right, title and interest of Borrower in (i) the Predevelopment Work.
3. This Assignment is given for the purpose of securing the payment of all sums, now or at any time due Lender under any of the Loan Documents and any extensions, modifications, amendments and renewals thereof, and the performance and discharge of the obligations, covenants, conditions and agreements of Borrower contained in any of the Loan Documents.
Borrower hereby consents to the Lender filing one (or more) financing statements, from time to time, with the California Secretary of State to evidence the assignment of the Predevelopment Work. Lender does not assume any of Borrower obligations or duties under any Predevelopment Work, including, but not limited to, the obligation to pay for the preparation of any Predevelopment Work unless and until the Lender exercises its rights pursuant to this Assignment.
4. Borrower hereby irrevocably appoints Lender as its attorney-in-fact, which power is coupled with an interest, so that Lender shall have the right to demand, receive, and enforce any and all of Borrower's rights with respect to the Predevelopment Work, and to perform any and all acts in the name of Borrower or in the name of Lender with the same force and effect as if performed by Borrower in the absence of this Assignment, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event which, with notice or the passage of time or both, would constitute an Event of Default under the Loan Documents, or following any termination thereunder. Until such occurrence and upon Borrower’s cure of any Event of Default permitted by the Loan Documents, 377
2 Borrower shall be entitled to exercise all rights pertaining to the Predevelopment Work.
5. Borrower agrees as follows:
(a) Borrower will faithfully abide by, perform and discharge each and every obligation, covenant, condition and agreement of the Predevelopment Work and all agreements relating thereto to be performed by Borrower and in accordance with the exercise of prudent business judgment, to enforce performance by the other parties thereto of each and every obligation, covenant, condition and agreement to be performed by each such other party. (b) During the continuance of an Event of Default under the Loan Documents, or following termination thereof, Lender may use Predevelopment Work for any lawful purpose without restriction except (if any) as may be provided in the Loan Agreement. (c) During the continuance of an Event of Default under the Loan Documents or following termination thereof, Lender may, at its option, without notice and without regard to the adequacy of security for the indebtedness hereby secured, either in person or by agent, with or without bringing any action or proceeding, or by a receiver to be appointed by a court at any time hereafter, enforce for its own benefit any one or all of the Predevelopment Work. The exercise of any rights under this Assignment shall not be deemed to cure or waive any default under any of the Loan Documents or waive, modify or affect any notice of default or Lender right to terminate under any of the Loan Documents or invalidate any act done by Lender pursuant to or following such notice.
(d) Each of the parties to any of the Predevelopment Work or agreement relating thereto other than Borrower, upon written notice from Lender of the continuance of an Event of Default or termination under the Loan Documents, shall be and hereby is authorized by Borrower to perform their respective agreements for the benefit of Lender in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof without any obligation to determine whether or not such an Event of Default or termination under the Loan Documents has in fact occurred and continues. (e) Before submitting to Lender a disbursement request to pay any Contractor, Borrower shall have provided Lender a Contractor Consent if required in the Loan Agreement.
6. Borrower hereby covenants and represents to Lender that: (a) Borrower has not previously assigned, sold, pledged, transferred, mortgaged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered the Predevelopment Work or any of them or its right, title and interest therein; (b) Borrower shall not assign, sell, pledge, transfer, mortgage, hypothecate or otherwise encumber its interests in the Predevelopment Work or any of them except that Borrower may do so in connection with the financing of the Project; (c) Borrower has not knowingly performed any act that might prevent Borrower from performing its undertakings hereunder or that might prevent Lender from operating under or enforcing any of the terms and conditions hereof or that would limit Lender in such operations or enforcement; (d) Borrower is not in default under any of the Predevelopment Work or agreement relating thereto, and to the best knowledge of Borrower, no other party to the respective Predevelopment Work or agreement relating thereto is in default thereunder; (e) except as provided in the Loan Agreement (if any), no amendments to any material terms of the Predevelopment Work or agreement relating thereto will be made without the prior written consent of Lender, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned; and (f) Borrower will deliver a copy of any Predevelopment Work (or the original at Lender’s request) paid for by the Predevelopment Loan as reasonably requested by Lender. 378
3 7. All notices, demands or documents that are required or permitted to be given or served hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed sufficiently given when delivered or mailed in the manner set forth in the Loan Agreement.
8. Any provision in the Loan Agreement that pertains to this Assignment shall be deemed to be incorporated herein as if such provision were fully set forth in this Assignment. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Assignment and the terms of the Loan Agreement, the terms of the Loan Agreement shall prevail. A provision in this Assignment shall not be deemed to be inconsistent with the Loan Agreement by reason of the fact that no provision in the Loan Agreement covers such provision in this Assignment.
9. This Assignment is made for collateral purposes only, and the duties and obligations of Borrower under this Assignment shall terminate when all sums due Lender under the Loan Documents are paid in full and all obligations, covenants, conditions and agreements of Borrower contained in the Loan Documents are performed and discharged.
10. This Assignment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts executed and wholly performed in that state
11. It is expressly intended, understood and agreed that this Assignment and the other Loan Documents are made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of Borrower and Lender and their respective successors and assigns (but in the case of assigns of Borrower, only to a Permitted Assignee as permitted in the Loan Agreement); that no other person or persons shall have any right at any time to action hereon or rights to the proceeds of the loan evidenced and secured by the Loan Documents; that such loan proceeds do not constitute a trust fund for the benefit of any third party; that no third party shall under any circumstances be entitled to any equitable lien on any such undisbursed loan proceeds at any times and that Lender shall have a lien upon and right to direct application of any such undisbursed loan proceeds as provided in the Loan Documents.
12. The relationship between Lender and Borrower is solely that of a lender and borrower, and nothing contained herein or in any of the Loan Documents shall in any manner be construed as making the parties hereto partners, joint venturers or any other relationship other than lender and borrower.
13. Borrower and Lender intend and believe that each provision in this Assignment comports with all applicable local, state or federal laws and judicial decisions. However, if any provision or provisions or if any portion of any provision or provisions in this Assignment is found by a court of law to be in violation of any applicable local, state or federal ordinance, statute, law, administrative or judicial decision or public policy, and if such court should declare such portion, provision or provisions of this Assignment to be illegal, invalid, unlawful, void or unenforceable as written, then it is the intent both of Borrower and Lender that such portion, provision or provisions shall be given force to the fullest possible extent that they are legal, valid and enforceable, that the remainder of this Assignment shall be construed as if such illegal, invalid, unlawful, void or unenforceable portion, provision or provisions were not contained therein and that the rights, obligations and interests of Borrower and Lender under the remainder of this Assignment shall continue in full force and effect.
379
4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has duly executed this Assignment on the day and year first above written.
NDC LAKE TAHOE LP
By: NDC Lake Tahoe LLC, a California limited liability company Its: General Partner
By: Novin Development Corp., a California corporation
Its: Sole Member
By:
Name: Iman Novin
Its: President
Date:
380
1 Schedule 1
Form of Contractor’s Consent (including Architect)
CONSENT AND AGREEMENT OF CONTRACTOR
The undersigned _______________________ (“Contractor”) hereby acknowledges and consents to the assignment to the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) of its contract with NDC Lake Tahoe LP, a California limited partnership (“Borrower”) titled “_______________” dated _____________________, 202___(the “Contract”), pursuant to that certain Assignment of Project Documents (the “Assignment”) that serves as security for a loan from the City (“Lender”) to Borrower. Contractor agrees to recognize, honor and be bound by the terms, provisions and conditions of the Assignment.
1. Contractor agrees:
(a) to furnish Lender copies of all written notices of default given by Contractor to Borrower with respect to any failure of Borrower to perform under the Contract,; (b) to accept any such performance by Lender as performance by the Borrower; and (c) so long as Lender commences to cure or cause to be cured any such breach, and the cure is carried on with due diligence (or in the case of a breach of Borrower’s payment obligations to the Contractor, so long as Lender pays or causes to be paid any sums payable from time to time by Borrower to Contractor under the Contract within a reasonable time after the same become due), then Contractor will continue to meet its obligations fully under the Contract and will not terminate the Contract, suspend work thereunder or place a lien or encumbrance on the Project.
2. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that Lender shall have no obligation to commence or continue the cure of any such breach or to pay or perform any obligation of Borrower to the Contractor except to the extent provided in the foregoing Assignment.
3. Contractor waives all recourse against Lender for all claims, whether amounts are due or otherwise, which it may have against Borrower first accruing or arising prior to any Event of Default or termination under Borrower's Loan Documents with Lender.
4. Contractor hereby expressly waives all Contract provisions that would impair, hinder or prevent the making of the Assignment by Borrower or the Lender’s enforcement thereof.
5. Contractor hereby represents and warrants to Lender that the Contract is in full force and effect on the date hereof and has not been amended or modified and that there are no uncured breaches thereof by any party thereto.
6. Contractor further agrees that:
(a) Without Lender’s prior written approval, Contractor will not enter into any agreement terminating, amending or modifying the terms, provisions or conditions of the Contract in any material respect;
381
2 (b) Without Lender’s prior written approval, Contractor will not transfer or assign the Contract;
(c) Contractor will deliver simultaneously to Lender copies of all change order requests delivered to Borrower;
(d) Upon any Event of Default or Lender termination under any of the Loan Documents, Lender shall have an absolute right to use and copy all drawings, plans, work products, including all copyrights and other rights relating thereto, and/or specifications and other materials prepared by or for Contractor with respect to the Project; and
(e) Upon Lender’s request, Contractor will provide Lender a schedule showing all amounts earned by the Contractor under the Contract.
7. All notices, requests, demands, approvals, or other communications given hereunder or in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given when delivered by hand or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
If to Contractor: [INSERT NAME AND ADDRESS]
If to Lender: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way,
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: City Manager
With a copy to: City Attorney
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
A copy of all notices under this Agreement shall also be delivered to Borrower.
If to Borrower: NDC Lake Tahoe LP
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 800
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Attention: Iman Novin
Email: [email protected]
With a copy to: SMR Development LLC,
529 N. Hillview Drive
Boise, ID 83712
Attention: Shellan Rodriguez
Email: [email protected]
382
3 8. This Consent and Agreement of Contractor shall bind the Contractor and its representatives, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of Lender and Lender’s successors and assigns, including, without limitation, any subsequent holder of the Predevelopment Note.
9. All capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed such terms in the Loan Agreement unless otherwise expressly defined herein.
[CONTRACTOR NAME]
By: _____________________________
Name:
Title:
Date:
383
4 Exhibit E
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Borrower and all contractors working on behalf of Borrower on the Project shall maintain a commercial general liability policy in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence, or such other policy limit as City may require in its reasonable discretion, including coverage for bodily injury, property damage, products, completed operations and contractual liability coverage. Such policy or policies shall be written on an occurrence basis and shall name the City and its officers, officials, agents, employees, and representatives as additional insureds.
All contractors working on behalf of Borrower shall maintain a comprehensive automobile liability coverage in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000), combined single limit including coverage for vehicles owned by such contractor, if any, and shall furnish or cause to be furnished to City evidence satisfactory to City that contractor with whom Borrower has contracted for the performance of work on the Property or otherwise pursuant to this Agreement carries workers' compensation insurance as required by law. Automobile liability policies shall name the City and its officers, officials, agents, employees, and representatives as additional insureds.
Companies writing the insurance required hereunder shall be licensed to do business in the State of California. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A: VII.
Prior to undertaking any activity to be paid or reimbursed using the Predevelopment Loan, Borrower shall furnish City with certificates of insurance in form acceptable to City evidencing the required insurance coverage and duly executed endorsements evidencing additional insured status. The certificates shall contain a statement of obligation on the part of the carrier to notify City of any material change, cancellation, termination or non-renewal of the coverage at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of any such material change, cancellation, termination or non-renewal. Coverage provided by Borrower shall be primary insurance and shall not be contributing with any insurance, or self-insurance maintained by City, and the policies shall so provide. The insurance policies shall contain a waiver of subrogation for the benefit of the City.
Borrower shall provide City with certified copies of the required insurance policies upon request of City.
384
5 Exhibit F
CERTIFICATION OF REQUEST FOR PAYMENT OF PREDEVELOPMENT COSTS Along with each request to City for funds relating to Predevelopment Costs under the Predevelopment Loan, Borrower shall furnish the following certification or the disbursement shall not be made. All terms used herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement (“Loan Agreement”).
The undersigned certifies that:
(a) The amounts requested are only for Predevelopment Costs, or reimbursement of Predevelopment Costs paid, in accordance with the Loan Agreement, and are included in the items and amounts described in Loan Agreement Exhibit A. (b) Certain payments to Contractors have been made by Borrower, and Borrower is requesting reimbursement for such costs in the amount of $___________. Evidence of payment of such costs included with the request for disbursement accompanying this Certification.
(c) If the Loan Agreement requires an executed Contractor Consent for any Contractor for which a disbursement is sought, such a Contractor Consent has been provided to the City. (d) Borrower is in full compliance with each Contractor Contract, and none of the Contractors is in default under their Contractor Contract.
(e) This request for funds does not include any amounts that Borrower intends to withhold or retain from a Contractor.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
385
6 NDC LAKE TAHOE LP
By: NDC Lake Tahoe LLC, a California limited liability company Its: General Partner
By: Novin Development Corp., a California corporation
Its: Sole Member
By:
Name: Iman Novin
Its: President
Date:
386
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:13
Agenda Item: Review of Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) prioritized list of Active Transportation Projects for the City’s Capital Improvement Program
Executive Summary: The creation of a prioritized list of active transportation projects is a part of an ongoing effort with Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) to assist in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) development process. The BAC and Public Works Department want to share the information with the Council and the public to receive input and direction on which active transportation projects to prioritize for planning, design, acquisition and grant funding requests.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion confirming preferred priority 1A projects for the City's Capital Improvement Program as set forth in Attachment 02 (List of BAC Priority 1A Projects).
Responsible Staff Member: Jason Burke, Complete Streets Program Manager, and Nicholas Brogna, Stormwater and Mobility Intern
Reviewed and Approved By: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report - BAC Project List.docx
02 - List of BAC Priority Projects.pdf
03 - Map of Proposed Bicycle Infrastructure.pdf
04-2018 ATP Technical Amendment 1-Project List.pdf
05 - BAC ATP List Presentation.pptx
387
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 4
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Review of Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) prioritized list of Active Transportation Projects for the City’s Capital Improvement Program.
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Jason Burke, Complete Streets Program Manager (530) 542- 6038 and Nicholas Brogna, Stormwater and Mobility Intern Background: In late 2023, the Public Works Department received a request to work with the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) to develop a prioritized list of planned active transportation projects. The BAC eagerly participated in defining ranking criteria and prioritizing future capital improvement projects to improve the bicycle and active transportation network within the city, which started with an August 2nd, 2023, BAC workshop meeting to develop this list and associated project location map (see attached). The meeting was advertised and open to the public and any other stakeholders who wanted to participate in developing the ranking criteria and listing potential projects. During subsequent BAC meetings open to the public, this list was further refined and reflects the current criteria and list of prioritized projects to improve active transportation connections within the city.
This list is focused on larger-scale intensive Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), complete streets projects, and Class 1 multi-use and boardwalk-related projects. These projects often involve extensive environmental review, technical design, community outreach, utility coordination, and stream environment zone/wetland permitting, which typically cost over $1 million to construct and implement. This list and prioritization project is not looking at smaller-scale quick wins or other low-hanging options related to traffic calming, traffic safety speed limits along the highway, or other potential improvements to the U.S. Highway
50. Main Street corridors and potential mobility hubs are separate initiatives, and this list is intended to serve as a road map for future CIP projects that the public works department will be seeking to develop and advance in response to community and stakeholder input.
The list is broken down based on the criteria developed by the BAC and shows projects' funding status. It shows projects that have funding, are next in the phasing for funding, or are long-term projects that are desirable but, under a variety of criteria, are not the current project priorities.
Issue and Discussion: This effort started with the 2018 regional active transportation plan existing and proposed project list, as attached. Small-scale Class 3 (bike routes) were removed from the list in order to focus on more capital-intensive Class 1 Multi-Use paths and other complete street projects that have been defined as a priority in the past but are more challenging and expensive to implement with a “Dig Once” approach to resolving failing or inadequate underground infrastructure. Many of these areas that lack sidewalks or dedicated bike paths within the City do not have adequate drainage or water quality treatment in areas that directly discharge to Lake Tahoe and potentially impair the clarity of the Lake.
Recently completed projects were removed, and new potential project concepts were added to this existing list from 2018. This included various projects in the City General Plan and town center Area Plans, as well as the LTUSD Safe Routes to School Plan. See the attached Map and List of Potential Projects. An interactive online version of the map is available online at:
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/07aa3f770d014209bf6dcd78f2c06c10 388
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 2 of 4
The BAC developed a series of ranking criteria to assist with prioritizing the list of projects. The ranking criteria are designed to help distinguish which projects should be focused on and applied for. The criteria that the BAC developed are as follows:
- Does the project create a link between two existing projects? - Will the project have a large volume of users?
- Does the project help to enhance safety with improvements in high-traffic areas? - Is the project feasible in terms of funding, acquisition or construction challenges? - Does the project provide access for community members in an equitable way? Based on these criteria, the BAC and City were able to effectively formulate a list in which projects were broken down into priority rankings. This list is not intended to be rigid, inflexible or linear. It is a general framework to communicate with the members of the BAC, the public, and the City Council about the current list of prioritized projects so there is a broad consensus about which will be targeted for funding in the near-term and which will need to wait for future funding opportunities. Of course, the availability of certain funding sources may result in some projects being advanced even if they are ranked slightly lower than others. For example, if there is an influx of Safe Routes to School or funding focused on affordable housing or equity, those projects best qualified for these funding sources will be prioritized to take advantage of funding. Regionally significant projects will also be more competitive for certain types of federal or Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) funding. Any changes in prioritization based on upcoming available funding will be noted in forthcoming requests for authorization to pursue grant funding for future planning, design, environmental and implementation funding required to advance these projects to completion.
Recently completed section of the Dennis
T. Machida Memorial Greenway spanning
Trout Creek, recently completed under an
MOU with El Dorado County. Photo
courtesy of Tahoe Regional Planning
Agency/Luxuri Media
Completed Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project.
Photo courtesy of Tahoe Regional Planning Agency/Luxuri Media
389
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 3 of 4
The City has benefitted from the visionary Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway concept, which will provide the backbone of a shared-use trail network in the south shore. Previously known as the South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail, the ultimate goal of the trail is to provide an off-highway, low-stress, ADA-accessible multi-use trail linking the west side of the City to Lake Tahoe via the Community College, Bijou Park, and ultimately Van Sickle State Park the eastern side of the City at the state line with Nevada utilizing the right-of-way acquired in the 1950s for a potential highway bypass. This publicly acquired land was later turned over to the California Tahoe Conservancy for management. A link to the CTC storymap for this visionary regional backbone for the south shore is available on the Conservancy website:
https://tahoe.ca.gov/dennis-machida-memorial-greenway/. This important interconnected system will assist with connecting the many other active transportation projects into a complete network that is safe and accessible for all active transportation users.
Financial Implications: Other than the Harrison Avenue Streetscape project, most active transportation projects constructed within the City have been completed with grants and small portions of City General Funds for a match, typically in the 12% range. While it is beneficial for the City to rely on grant funds to design, permit, and implement these projects, it takes considerably more staff time and capacity to obtain grants from various sources and often results in drawn-out timeframes for project completion. If the City had dedicated or consistent funding for active transportation projects, it would be feasible to hold to project schedules and deadlines while waiting for grant funding, which will rationally take longer to complete these types of capital projects. Per City grant and procurement policies, staff will request authorization to pursue future grant funds for each specific project included on this list as funding opportunities become available.
Current funding status per Priority Group
Priority Group Total Funding Needed Funding Secured Unfunded Priority 1 A $42.4 Million $25.5 Million $16.9 Million
Priority 1 B $25 Million $0 $25 Million
Priority 2 $39 Million $0 $39 Million
Priority 3 & 4 $32.6 Million $0 $32.6 Million
Total $139 Million $25.5 Million $113.5 Million
While these numbers are high, it is important to note that in the last 10 years, the City has completed approximately $26.2 million dollars worth of grant-funded active transportation and Complete Streets projects, including:
- 2014: Harrison Ave Streetscape Improvement and Bike Trail ($7.1 Million) - 2017: El Dorado to Ski Run Bike Path ($4 Million)
- 2018: Al Tahoe Safety and Mobility Enhancement Project ($3 Million) - 2019: Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project ($6.8 Million) - 2022: Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail - Viking Way to South “Y” ($5.3 Million) Additionally, the California Tahoe Conservancy and County of El Dorado constructed two key segments of the Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway within the City in 2016 and 201, spanning from Sierra Boulevard to Herbert Avenue at a total cost of $6.8 Million. These projects provided a combined total of $33.3 million in Complete Streets and active transportation improvement investments within the City in the last 10 years.
Environmental Considerations: Review and receiving feedback on this conceptual list of prioritized projects is statutorily exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines section 15262 (planning and feasibility studies). “A project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the agency, board, or commission has not approved, adopted, or funded does not require the preparation of an EIR or negative declaration but does require consideration of environmental factors. This 390
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 4 of 4
section does not apply to the adoption of a plan that will have a legally binding effect on later activities.” All projects included on this prioritized list will undergo project specific CEQA review during the detailed planning and design phase and this review of the prioritized list has no funding allocation associated and is intended to be advisory, not legally binding at this time.
Policy Implications: Reviewing and advising staff on this prioritized list of active transportation projects based on feedback from the community at Bicycle Advisory Committee meeting open to all members of the public is consistent with the City Council Strategic Priorities and Goals, specifically:
Action Item 1.4 (Transportation): Prioritize the implementation of trail and complete street projects including continued progress of the Greenway to Van Sickle Bi-State Park. Action Item 2.3 (Connectivity): Enhance the connectivity of the community for those on foot and bike, while promoting a car-free culture.
Action Item 5.3 (Infrastructure and Maintenance): Actively seek funding to develop sustainable infrastructure projects, based on the prioritized capital improvement project list.
The project will also provide greenhouse gas reduction benefits, providing progress on Action #WB-1 of the 2020 Climate Action Plan: Improve bicycle and pedestrian networks. 391
Priority
Ranking 1-
4 PROJECT NAME
Link -
addressing gaps
in existing
network 1-3
User
Volume
1-3
User
Safety
1-3
Feasibility
1-3
Equity
1-3
RANK
SUM Total Cost Secured Unfunded Need
1A BIJOU PARK MULTI-USE
CONNECTOR PATH 3 3 2 3 3 14 $1,849,056 $1,849,056 $0
1A
DENNIS MACHIDA
MEMORIAL GREENWAY -
PHASE 1C
3 2 3 3 3 14 $9,500,000 $263,000 $9,237,000
1A
PIONEER TRAIL
PEDESTRIAN PROJECT -
PHASE II
3 3 3 3 2 14 $6,149,000 $6,232,894 ($83,894)
1A TATA LANE/B STREET
CONNECTOR 3 3 2 3 3 14 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0
1A
TAHOE VALLEY
GREENBELT (BARTON
CONNECTOR PATHS)
3 3 3 3 2 14 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $0
1A STATELINE COMPLETE
STREETS PROJECT 3 3 3 2 2 13 $6,500,000 $100,000 $6,400,000 1A PALMIRA TO BIKEWAY 3 3 2 2 2 12 $1,370,000 $56,684 $1,313,316 $42,368,056 $25,501,634 $16,866,422
1B JOHNSON BLVD SHARED
USE PATH 3 3 3 3 2 14 $4,300,000 $0 $4,300,000
1B
PARK AVE AND
LAKESHORE COMPLETE
STREETS
3 3 3 3 2 14 $6,500,000 $0 $6,500,000
1B
SPRUCE AVENUE SAFE
ROUTES TO SCHOOL
PROJECT
3 3 3 2 3 14 $2,030,000 $0 $2,030,000
1B BIJOU MEADOW
CONNECTOR 3 3 3 2 3 14 $4,742,641 $0 $4,742,641
1B SOUTH TAHOE HIGH
ACCESS ROAD 3 2 3 2 2 12 $1,450,000 $0 $1,450,000
1B B STREET CONNECTOR 3 2 3 2 2 12 $3,500,000 $0 $3,500,000 1B OAKLAND AVENUE BRIDGE 3 2 2 2 2 11 $2,500,000 $0 $2,500,000 $25,022,641 $0 $25,022,641
2 LINK ROAD CONNECTION 3 3 1 2 2 11 $2,010,000 $0 $2,010,000 2 DUNLAP DR CONNECTOR 3 3 2 2 1 11 $8,700,000 $0 $8,700,000 2 TAHOE VALLEY
ELEMENTARY/ WYOMING
CONNECTOR
2 2 3 2 2 11 $3,480,000 $0 $3,480,000
2 SOUTH AVE BARTON
CAMPUS 3 3 1 2 2 11 $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000
2 BLACKWOOD ROAD SAFE
ROUTES TO SCHOOL
PROJECT
1 1 3 2 3 10 $9,000,000 $0 $9,000,000
2 RUFUS ALLEN BLVD
SHARED USE PATH SAFE
ROUTES TO SCHOOL
2 2 2 2 2 10 $3,300,000 $0 $3,300,000
2 THIRD STREET/ TAHOE
VALLEY ELEMENTARY 2 2 3 1 2 10 $7,540,000 $0 $7,540,000 2 WASHINGTON AVENUE
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
PROJECT
2 2 2 2 2 10 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
$37,020,000 $0 $37,020,000
3 BIKE TRAIL ALONG
HIGHWAY 50 FROM H
STREET TO THE AIRPORT
1 1 3 2 29 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
3 LYONS AVE CONNECTOR
TO MARLETT CIRCLE 3 2 1 1 29 $8,204,200 $0 $8,204,200
3 MIDDLE SCHOOL SR2S
PROJECT - RUFUS ALLEN
CONNECTOR
2 2 1 2 29 $4,350,000 $0 $4,350,000
3 SOUTH TAHOE BIKEWAY
EXTENSION JAMES
CONNECTOR
2 2 1 2 18 $1,425,000 $0 $1,425,000
3 SR 89 SHARED USE PATH
SOUTH TAHOE "Y" TO 15TH
ST
1 1 1 2 16 $5,042,800 $0 $5,042,800
3 GLENWOOD WAY SHARED
USE PATH 1 1 1 1 15 $3,750,000 $0 $3,750,000
4 GARDNER MOUNTAIN
CONNECTOR PATH 1 2 2 0 16 $3,800,000 $0 $3,800,000
$32,572,000 $0 $32,572,000
Priority 1A: Budget Subtotal
Priority 1B : Budget Subtotal
Priority 2: Budget Subtotal
Priority 3 & 4: Budget Subtotal
392
393
Appendix H
Existing & Proposed Project List
(Updated - 2018 Technical Amendment)
394
NAME DESCRIPTION MILES FROM TO MAINTAINED IN WINTER MAINTENANCE JURISDICTION YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTING AGENCY COUNTY AL TAHOE BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.27 JOHNSON BLVD COLLEGE DR YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE AL TAHOE BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.85 E. COLLEGE DR PIONEER TRAIL YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEB STREET (NORTH SIDE) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.07 CVS PARKING LOT HELEN AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE B STREET (NORTH SIDE) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.07 CVS PARKING LOT SOUTH AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BLACK ROCK ROAD BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.05 PINE BLVD PARK AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE UNKNOWN CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BLACK ROCK ROAD BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.02 PINE BLVD PARK AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE UNKNOWN CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOECOMMUNITY PLAYFIELDS C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.32 AL TAHOE BLVD MEADOW CREST DR NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2003 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE EL DORADO BEACH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.30 FREMONT AVE LAKEVIEW COMMONS YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE EL DORADO BEACH TO SKI RUN C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.81 El DORADO BEACH SKI RUN BLVD YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2017 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE GREENWAY PHASE 1A C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.43 GLENWOOD WAY HERBERT AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2015 CTC CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEHARRISON AVE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.47 LOS ANGELES LAKEVIEW COMMONS YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2014 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE LAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.33 AL TAHOE BLVD LTCC CAMPUS NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE LAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.50 CAMPUS AL TAHOE BLVD NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOELAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.14 SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT LTCC CAMUS NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOELINEAR PARK C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.75 SKI RUN BLVD PIONEER TRAIL YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE LINEAR PARK SPUR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.32 BEHIND MCDONALDS SKI RUN MARINA NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE LYONS AVE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.18 RUFUS ALLEN BLVD US‐50 NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOESKI RUN BLVD (EAST SIDE) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.55 US HWY 50 PIONEER TRAIL YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2004 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SKI RUN BLVD (WEST SIDE) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.55 US HWY 50 PIONEER TRAIL YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2004 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOESOUTH AVE CLASS 1 C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.02 SOUTH AVE WINNEMUCCA AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE before 2010 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.18 RUBICON TRAIL SILVER DOLLAR AVE YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOESOUTH LAKE TAHOE BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.34 PONDEROSA ELOISE AVE YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BIKE ROUTE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.18 LOS ANGELES AVE CAVE ROCK AVE YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BIKE ROUTE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.76 LOS ANGELES AVE MACINAW RD YES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SOUTH LAKE TAHOE REC CENTER C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.59 R.ALLEN TOSEN CNTR EL DORADO LIBRARY NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOESOUTH LAKE TAHOE REC CENTER C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.06 R.ALLEN TOSEN CNTR REC CENTER NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SOUTH LAKE TAHOE REC CENTER C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.10 R.ALLEN TOSEN CNTR REC CENTER NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOECITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 9.2015TH STREET C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.34 VENICE DRIVE ELOISE AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2008 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HEAVENLY VILLAGE WAY C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.12 US HWY 50 BELLAMY CT N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HELEN AVE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.29 4TH AVE WINNEMUCCA AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HWY 50 C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.51 SOUTH TAHOE ""Y"" E STREET N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2014 CALTRANS CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE JOHNSON BLVD C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.91 US‐50 AL TAHOE BLVD N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE i dont know CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE LAKE TAHOE BLVD C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.47 GLORENE AVE TATA LN N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE LAKEVIEW AVE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.59 US HWY 50 BERKELEY AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE MELBA C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.31 B STREET D STREET/US‐50 N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE before 2010 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PIONEER TRAIL C‐2/BIKE LANE 3.07 GLEN RD BLACK BART N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2002 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEPIONEER TRAIL C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.21 US HWY 50 (SOUTH LAKE TAHOE) GLEN RD N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2007 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOESIERRA BLVD C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.54 PALMIRA AVE FOUNTAIN AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SR 89 BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.38 SOUTH TAHOE "Y" ONE LANE MERGE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2016 CALTRANS CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE TAHOE KEYS BLVD C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.80 ELOISE AVE VENICE DR N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEUS HIGHWAY 50 BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.95 TROUT CREEK SKI RUN BLVD N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2011 CALTRANS CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE US HIGHWAY 50 BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.25 SKI RUN BLVD WILDWOOD AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2013 CALTRANS CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE VENICE DRIVE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.41 MARINA TAHOE KEYS BLVD N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE C‐2/BIKE LANE 12.1613TH STREET C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.10 ELOISE AVE SR 89 N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BELLEVUE AVE/EL DORADO AVE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.96 LAKEVIEW AVE OAKLAND AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BLACKWOOD ROAD C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.67 PIONEER TRAIL FAWN WAY N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE ELOISE AVE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 1.70 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BIKE PATH NEAR TAHOE KEYS 15TH STREET N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HELEN AVE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.20 4TH STREET SOUTH AVE BIKE PATH N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PONDEROSA C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.21 SILVER DOLLAR SUNSET DR N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE RIVER DRIVE/WILLIAM STREET C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.33 US HWY 50 SIERRA BLVD N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOERUBICON TRAIL C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.22 MACKINAW SUSSEX AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE RUFUS ALLEN BLVD C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.52 US HWY 50 LYONS AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SUSSEX AVE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.05 RUBICON TRAIL SUSSEX AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE TAHOE ISLAND DRIVE/12 STREET C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 1.20 TAHOE KEYS BLVD ELOISE AVE N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE TAMARACK AVE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.48 PIONEER TRAIL BLACKWOOD ROAD N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEWILLIAM ST/RIVER DRIVE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.57 RIVER DRIVE/US HWY 50 SIERRA BLVD N/A CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 7.23
Existing Active Transportation Facilities
395
NAME DESCRIPTION MILES FROM TO MAINTAINED IN WINTER MAINTENANCE JURISDICTION YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTING AGENCY COUNTY AL TAHOE BLVD SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.36 US HWY 50 COLLEGE DR NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEAL TAHOE SIDEWALKS SIDEWALK 0.40 HWY 50 JOHNSON BLVD NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2015 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE BLACKWOOD ROAD SIDEWALK 0.05 GLENWOOD WAY HERBERT AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HEAVENLY VILLAGE (WEST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.18 HWY 50 MONTREAL RD NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE UNKNOWN CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HEAVENLY VILLAGE WY(EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.18 HWY 50 LAKE PARKWAY NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE UNKNOWN CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEHWY 50 SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.30 STATELINE AVE PARK AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2014 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEHWY 50 SIDEWALK (EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.11 PIONEER TRAIL HEAVENLY VILLAGE WAY NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HWY 50 SIDEWALK (EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.29 HEAVENLY VILLAGE WAY STATELINE AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HWY 50 SIDEWALK (EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.27 WILDWOOD AVE MIDWAY RD NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HWY 50 SIDEWALK (EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.22 SKI RUN BLVD WILDWOOD AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HWY 50 SIDEWALK (WEST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.12 HEAVENLY VILLAGE WAY PIONEER TRAIL NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOELAKE TAHOE BLVD SIDEWALK 0.62 SOUTH TAHOE "Y" VIKING WAY NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE LAKE TAHOE BLVD SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.59 D STREET SOUTH TAHOE ""Y"" NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PARK AVE SIDEWALK (WEST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.06 MANZANITA PINE BLVD NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2014 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PINE BLVD SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.42 STATELINE AVE FRIDAY AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2014 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEPINE BLVD SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.26 STATELINE AVE PARK AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2014 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PIONEER TRAIL (NORTH SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.45 LARCH AVE HWY 50 NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2013 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEPIONEER TRAIL (SOUTH SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.47 LARCH AVE HWY 50 NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2013 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SR 89 SIDEWALK (EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.21 HWY 50 DUNLAP DR NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2014 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SR 89 SIDEWALKS (EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.86 5TH STREET 15TH STREET NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2016 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SR 89 SIDEWALKS (WEST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.99 TUCKER AVE 15TH STREET NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2016 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE US HIGHWAY 50 SIDEWALKS ‐ EAST SIDEWALK 1.74 TROUT CREEK SKI RUN BLVD NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2012 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE US HIGHWAY 50 SIDEWALKS ‐ EAST SIDEWALK 0.29 TROUT CREEK BLUE LAKE AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2012 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE US HIGHWAY 50 SIDEWALKS ‐ WEST SIDEWALK 0.97 TROUT CREEK LAKEVIEW AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2012 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE US HWY 50 SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.70 SOUTH TAHOE "Y" F STREET NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE US HWY 50 SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.62 SOUTH TAHOE ""Y"" E STREET NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Before 2006 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOEWILDWOOD AVE (EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.05 HWY 50 OSGOOD AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2012 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE WILDWOOD AVE (WEST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.05 HWY 50 OSGOOD AVE NO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2012 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE SIDEWALK 11.83ELKS POINT ROAD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.41 NEVADA BEACH DORLA CT NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2002 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY NSS SOUTH DEMO C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.02 KAHLE DRIVE ELKS POINT RD NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2012 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTYNSS SOUTH DEMO C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.11 NEVADA STATELINE TO STATELINE PATH ROUND HILL PINES BEACH RESORT NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2013 TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT DOUGLAS COUNTY NSS SOUTH DEMO ELKS PT TO RH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.01 ELKS POINT ROAD ROUND HILL PINES BEACH RESORT NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2013 TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT DOUGLAS COUNTY NV ST. TO ST. ‐ LAURA DRIVE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.14 KAHLE DRIVE 4TH RD NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2015 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY ROUND HILL BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.04 ROUND HILL KINGSBURY MIDDLE SCHOOL NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2002 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY ROUND HILL BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.64 KINGSBURY MIDDLE SCHOOL PINERIDGE DR NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2002 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY ZEPHYR COVE BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.38 ZEPHYR COVE STABLES WARRIOR WAY NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2016 USFS DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 4.76ELKS POINT ROAD C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.14 ELKS POINT CLASS I SHARED USE TRAIL US‐50 N/A DOUGLAS COUNTY Before 2006 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTYLAKE PARKWAY (EAST) C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.61 STATELINE LAKE PARKWAY N/A DOUGLAS COUNTY 2013 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY LAKE PARKWAY (WEST) C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.51 STATELINE LAKE PARKWAY N/A DOUGLAS COUNTY 2013 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.25MARKET STREET BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.19 SR 207 MARKET STREET N/A TRPA 2017 TRPA DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.19HWY 50 SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.15 KAHLE DRIVE KINGSBURY GRADE NO DOUGLAS COUNTY Before 2006 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY HWY 50 SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.14 KAHLE DRIVE 4TH RD NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2013 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY HWY 50 SIDEWALK (EAST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.37 STATELINE AVE LAKE PARKWAY NO DOUGLAS COUNTY Before 2006 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY HWY 50 SIDEWALK (WEST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.36 LAKE PARKWAY STATELINE AVE NO DOUGLAS COUNTY Before 2006 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY KAHLE COMMUNITY PARK PATH SIDEWALK 0.40 SR 207 HWY 50 NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2010 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY KAHLE DRIVE SIDEWALK 0.08 HWY 50 LAURA DR NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2013 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY KINGSBURY GRADE SIDEWALK 0.49 US HWY 50 DAGGETT WAY NO DOUGLAS COUNTY Before 2006 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY KINGSBURY GRADE SIDEWALK 0.49 US HWY 50 PINEDROP DR NO DOUGLAS COUNTY Before 2006 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY LAKE PARKWAY (WEST) SIDEWALK 0.27 US HWY 50 EDGEWOOD ENTRANCE NO DOUGLAS COUNTY Before 2006 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY LAKE PARKWAY SIDEWALKS ‐ EAST SIDEWALK 0.59 STATELINE LAKE PARKWAY NO DOUGLAS COUNTY 2013 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY US HWY 50 (WEST) SIDEWALK 0.34 STATE ROUTE 207/KINGSBURY GRADE LAKE PARKWAY NO DOUGLAS COUNTY Before 2006 DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY Existing Active Transportation Facilities
396
NAME DESCRIPTION MILES FROM TO MAINTAINED IN WINTER MAINTENANCE JURISDICTION YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTING AGENCY COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY SIDEWALK 3.70
15TH STREET BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.32 15TH STREET POPE/BALDWIN PATH NO EL DORADO COUNTY 2003 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTYARAPAHOE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.09 EXISTING BIKE PATH ARAPAHOE ST YES EL DORADO COUNTY 2008 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY CAMP RICHARDSON TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.08 CAMP RICHARDSON CAMPGROUND ICE CREAM PARLOR NO EL DORADO COUNTY 2016 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTYFALLEN LEAF LAKE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.39 SR 89 FALLEN LEAF LAKE CAMPGROUND NO EL DORADO COUNTY 2014 USFS EL DORADO COUNTY LAKE TAHOE BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.61 SAWMILL ROAD VIKING WAY YES EL DORADO COUNTY 2014 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY PAT LOWE (NORTH) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.50 APACHE LUTHER PASS YES EL DORADO COUNTY Before 2006 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTYPAT LOWE (SOUTH) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.93 PIONEER TRAIL LUTHER PASS YES EL DORADO COUNTY Before 2006 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTYPOPE/BALDWIN PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.48 VALHALLA POPE BEACH ENTRANCE NO EL DORADO COUNTY Before 2006 USFS EL DORADO COUNTY POPE/BALDWIN PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.50 HERITAGE WAY (VISITOR CENTER) SPRING CREEK NO EL DORADO COUNTY Before 2006 USFS EL DORADO COUNTYPOPE/BALDWIN PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.31 15TH STREET BIKE TRAIL POPE BEACH ENTRANCE NO EL DORADO COUNTY Before 2006 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTYPOPE/BALDWIN PTH‐VALHALLA FORK C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.58 STATE ROUTE 89 VALHALLA/HERITAGE WAY NO EL DORADO COUNTY Before 2006 USFS EL DORADO COUNTY SAWMILL 2A C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.76 LAKE TAHOE BLVD US‐50 YES EL DORADO COUNTY 2012 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTYSAWMILL BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.51 SAWMILL ROAD APACHE YES EL DORADO COUNTY 2007 (1A) 2008 (1B) EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.26 EL DORADO COUNTY LINE GENERAL CREEK NO TCPUD Before 2006 PLACER COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTYWEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.46 GENERAL CREEK SUGAR PINE POINT NO TCPUD Before 2006 PLACER COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.59 SUGAR PINE POINT MEEKS BAY NO TCPUD 2018 TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 13.38APACHE AVE (WEST) C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.38 EAST SAN BERNADINO US‐50 N/A EL DORADO COUNTY Before 2006 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY LAKE TAHOE BLVD C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.08 MT RAINIER DR SAWMILL RD N/A EL DORADO COUNTY 2015 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY NORTH UPPER TRUCKEE C‐2/BIKE LANE 4.62 LAKE TAHOE BLVD ELKS CLUB DR N/A EL DORADO COUNTY Before 2006 EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY PIONEER TRAIL C‐2/BIKE LANE 2.76 BLACK BART GLEN EAGLES ROAD N/A EL DORADO COUNTY 2002 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE EL DORADO COUNTY PIONEER TRAIL C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.92 GLEN EAGLES ROAD US‐50 MEYERS N/A EL DORADO COUNTY 2002 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY C‐2/BIKE LANE 10.75
HWY 50 SIDEWALK (SOUTHSIDE) SIDEWALK 0.06 SOUTH UPPER TRUCKEE CIRUGU ST NO EL DORADO COUNTY 2014 CALTRANS EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY SIDEWALK 0.06
DOLLAR CREEK SHARED USE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 2.31 DOLLAR DR FULTON CRESCENT DR NO PLACER COUNTY 2018 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY LAKESIDE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.19 COMMONS BEACH GROVE ST YES TCPUD 2011 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY LAKESIDE PATH PHASESV,VI,VII C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.37 EXISTING PATH WEST OF TAHOE CITY MARINA LAKESIDE PATH YES TCPUD 2012 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY NATIONAL AVENUE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.23 STATE ROUTE 28 TOYON RD YES NTPUD 2014 NTPUD PLACER COUNTYNORTH SHORE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.56 LAKEFOREST ROAD DOLLAR DR YES TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY NORTH SHORE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.67 BURTON CREEK STATE PARK TAHOE STATE REC AREA YES TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTYNORTH SHORE PATH CONNECTOR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.02 NORTH SHORE PATH STATE ROUTE 28 YES TCPUD UNKNOWN TCPUD PLACER COUNTY PINEDROP TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.19 NORTH TAHOE REGIONAL PARK PINEDROP LANE NO NTPUD Before 2006 NTPUD PLACER COUNTY SNOW CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.16 TOYON ROAD/CONNECTION WITH NTPUD PATH
SNOW CREEK NO PLACER COUNTY 2014 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY TRUCKEE R. PED BRIDGE LOOP C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.00 TRUCKEE RIVER BRIDGE 64‐ACRES YES TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY TRUCKEE RIVER TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 3.43 TRUCKEE RIVER BRIDGE ALPINE MEADOWS NO TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTYTRUCKEE RIVER TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 3.39 BASIN BOUNDARY OLYMPIC VALLEY NO TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY TRUCKEE RIVER TRAIL (BRIDGE) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.03 64‐ACRES BRIDGE TO W RIVER RD YES TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.15 FANNY BRIDGE TRANSIT CENTER YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTYWEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.06 FANNY BRIDGE BRIDGETENDER ROUNDABOUT YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.04 BRIDGETENDER ROUNDABOUT BRIDGETENDER ROUNDABOUT YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.14 BRIDGETENDER ROUNDABOUT 64‐ACRES ROUNDABOUT YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.32 BRIDGETENDER ROUNDABOUT WEST SHORE BIKE PATH YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.38 64‐ACRES ROUNDABOUT SR 89 BIKE PATH YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.13 64‐ACRES ROUNDABOUT TRANSIT CENTER YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY Existing Active Transportation Facilities
397
NAME DESCRIPTION MILES FROM TO MAINTAINED IN WINTER MAINTENANCE JURISDICTION YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTING AGENCY COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.12 TAHOE CITY OUT BRIDGE LAKE YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.03 MACINAW RD WEST END FANNY BRIDGE YES TCPUD before 2010 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.06 64‐ACRE ENTRANCE SEQUOIA YES TCPUD Before 2006 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.43 RUBICON AVE CHERRY ST NO TCPUD Before 2006 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.06 FREMONT WAY PINE ST (EL DORADO COUNTY LINE) NO TCPUD Before 2006 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 2.87 WILLIAM KENT CAMPGROUND RUBICON AVE TAHOE PINES NO TCPUD Before 2006 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.34 SEQUOIA WEST SHORE PATH YES TCPUD UNKNOWN PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY WEST SHORE TAHOE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 2.10 HOMEWOOD TAHOMA NO TCPUD 2016 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 22.77NATIONAL AVENUE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.23 SR 28 TOYON RD N/A PLACER COUNTY UNKNOWN PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY STATE ROUTE 28 BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 7.28 DOLLAR DRIVE CHIPMUNK ST KINGS BEACH N/A PLACER COUNTY 2009 CALTRANS PLACER COUNTYSTATE ROUTE 28 BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.78 CHIPMUNK STREET STATELINE N/A PLACER COUNTY 2009 CALTRANS PLACER COUNTY STATE ROUTE 28 BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 2.27 TAHOE STATE RECREATION AREA DOLLAR DR N/A PLACER COUNTY 2012 CALTRANS PLACER COUNTY WARD CREEK TO TAHOMA BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 6.14 TAHOMA WARD CREEK N/A PLACER COUNTY 2015 CALTRANS PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY C‐2/BIKE LANE 16.70MCKINNEY DRIVE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.74 STATE ROUTE 89 (NORTH) STATE ROUTE 89 (SOUTH) N/A TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY SAN SOUCI/TAHOE SKI BOWL WAY C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.46 MCKINNEY DRIVE FAWN ST N/A TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY SEQUOIA AVE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.34 CA‐89 FIR AVE N/A PLACER COUNTY UNKNOWN PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTYSTATE ROUTE 89 C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.11 TAHOE SKI BOWL WAY MCKINNEY DR N/A PLACER COUNTY Before 2006 CALTRANS PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 1.65CA ‐28 SIDEWALK (NORTHSIDE) SIDEWALK 0.71 GROVE STREET FAIRWAY DRIVE NO PLACER COUNTY UNKNOWN PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY KB REVITALIZATION PROJECT SIDEWALK 0.87 STATE ROUTE 267 CHIPMUNK STREET YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTYKB SIDEWALKS ‐ BEAR STREET SIDEWALK 0.05 STATE ROUTE 28 TROUT STREET YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY KB SIDEWALKS ‐ BROOKE AVE SIDEWALK 0.14 BEAR STREET COON STREET YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY KB SIDEWALKS ‐ DEER STREET SIDEWALK 0.03 STATE ROUTE 28 RAINBOW AVE YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTYKB SIDEWALKS ‐ FOX STREET SIDEWALK 0.32 STATE ROUTE 28 STEELHEAD AVE YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY KB SIDEWALKS ‐ MINNOW AVE SIDEWALK 0.07 FOX STREET CHIPMUNK STREET YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY KB SIDEWALKS ‐ SECLINE AVE SIDEWALK 0.16 STATE ROUTE 28 STEELHEAD AVE YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTYKB SIDEWALKS ‐ STEELHEAD AVE SIDEWALK 0.57 SECLINE STREET FOX STREET YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY KB SIDEWALKS ‐COON STREET SIDEWALK 0.40 STATE ROUTE 28 DOLLY VARDEN AVE YES PLACER COUNTY 2015 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY NORTH TAHOE RECREATION AREA SIDEWALK 0.15 NATIONAL AVE NORTH TAHOE REC AREA YES NTPUD UNKNOWN NTPUD PLACER COUNTY RED CEDAR STREET SIDEWALK 0.07 N. LAKE BLVD (CA‐28) TAHOE ST NO PLACER COUNTY 2014 PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTYSTATE ROUTE 28 SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.56 TAHOE STATE RECREATION AREA‐‐TRUCKEE RIVER OUTLET
SR 28 BIKE PATH NO TCPUD Before 2006 TCPUD PLACER COUNTY STATELINE RD SIDEWALK 0.06 STATE ROUTE 28 CRYSTAL DR NO WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY SIDEWALK 4.09 INCLINE VILLAGE PARK PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.41 SOUTHWOOD BLVD IVGID REC CENTER YES IVGID Before 2006 IVGID WASHOE COUNTY LAKESHORE BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 2.97 WEST TERMINUS PARK STATE ROUTE 28 YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTYMAYS BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.27 LAKESHORE BLVD ALLEN WAY YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY MAYS BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.15 BURNT CEDAR CREEK SOUTHWOOD BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY NORTHWOOD BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.35 VILLAGE BLVD (NORTH) NORTHWOOD MIDBLOCK CROSSING YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY NORTHWOOD BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.26 NORTHWOOD MIDBLOCK CROSSING STATE ROUTE 28 YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY NORTHWOOD BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.14 VILLAGE BLVD NORTHWOOD BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY UNKNOWN WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY NV STATELINE TO STATELINE (P2) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 2.44 LAKESHORE BLVD SAND HARBOR STATE PARK NO WASHOE COUNTY 2018 NDOT WASHOE COUNTYSOUTHWOOD BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.05 STATE ROUTE 28‐SKATE PARK SOUTHWOOD BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY SOUTHWOOD BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.48 STATE ROUTE 28 VILLAGE BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY SOUTHWOOD BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.75 STATE ROUTE 28 VILLAGE BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTYVILLAGE BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.38 SOUTHWOOD BLVD LAKESHORE BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTYVILLAGE BLVD (NORTH) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.55 ACE COURT NORTHWOOD BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTYVILLAGE BLVD (NORTH) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.19 NORTHWOOD BLVD STATE ROUTE 28 YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY Existing Active Transportation Facilities
398
NAME DESCRIPTION MILES FROM TO MAINTAINED IN WINTER MAINTENANCE JURISDICTION YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTING AGENCY COUNTY VILLAGE BLVD (SOUTH) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.26 STATE ROUTE 28 SOUTHWOOD BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 9.65STATE ROUTE 28 BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.97 LAKESHORE BLVD (WEST) SOUTHWOOD BLVD (EAST) N/A WASHOE COUNTY 2002 NDOT WASHOE COUNTY STATE ROUTE 28 BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.72 SOUTHWOOD BLVD (EAST) LAKESHORE BLVD (EAST) N/A WASHOE COUNTY 2002 NDOT WASHOE COUNTYWASHOE COUNTY C‐2/BIKE LANE 3.69COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE (WEST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.21 INCLINE WAY LAKESHORE BLVD YES HYATT HOTEL 2007 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE (WEST SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.30 STATE ROUTE 28 INCLINE WAY YES WASHOE COUNTY 2007 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY INCLINE WAY SIDEWALK 0.26 VILLAGE BLVD SOUTHWOOD BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY 2012? WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTYINCLINE WAY (NORTH SIDE) SIDEWALK 0.16 INCLINE CREEK COUNTRY CLUB DR YES HYATT HOTEL 2007 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTYORIOLE WAY SIDEWALK 0.35 SOUTHWOOD BLD TANAGER ST YES WASHOE COUNTY 2012? WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTYSTATE ROUTE 28 SIDEWALK 0.14 STATELINE ROAD RESERVOIR RD NO WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY STATE ROUTE 28 (NORTH) PED SIDEWALK 0.47 NORTHWOOD BLVD VILLAGE BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY STATE ROUTE 28 (NORTH) PED SIDEWALK 0.23 VILLAGE BLVD RD D YES WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY STATE ROUTE 28 (SOUTH) PED SIDEWALK 0.48 SOUTHWOOD BLVD VILLAGE BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTYSTATE ROUTE 28 (SOUTH) PED SIDEWALK 0.32 VILLAGE BLVD SOUTHWOOD BLVD EAST YES WASHOE COUNTY 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY STATE ROUTE 28 SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.55 SOUTHWOOD BLVD COUNTRY CLUB DR YES WASHOE COUNTY 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY STATE ROUTE 28 SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.16 STATELINE RD CALNEVA DR EAST NO WASHOE COUNTY Before 2006 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY TANAGER ST SIDEWALK 0.18 ORIOLE WAY VILLAGE BLVD YES WASHOE COUNTY 2007 WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY VILLAGE BLVD SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0.06 PEEPSIGHT CT LAKE COUNTRY DR NO WASHOE COUNTY UNKNOWN WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY SIDEWALK 3.87
Existing Active Transportation Facilities
399
EIP PROJECT
NUMBER
PROJECT NAME DESCRIPTION MILES STAGE IMPLEMENTING AGENCY JURISDICTION ESTIMATED COST SOUTH TAHOE GREENWAY SHARED USE TRAIL PLANNING AND FUTURE PHASES (SIERRA TRACT TO MEYERS) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 4.96 PLANNINGSOUTH TAHOE GREENWAY SHARED USE TRAIL PLANNING AND FUTURE PHASES (PHASE 3 SKI RUN TO VAN SICKLE STATE PARK) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.90 PLANNING
6.86 $7,844,000
N/A HWY 50 CITY TO MEYERS BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 2.11 PLANNING CALTRANS CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE / EL DORADO COUNTY $21,000 N/A HWY 50, Y INTERSECTION AREA C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.13 PLANNING CALTRANS CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,303 N/A STATE ROUTE 267 C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.53 PLANNING CALTRANS PLACER COUNTY $15,347
01.01.02.0019 US HIGHWAY 50 WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ‐ WILDWOOD TO STATELINE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.90 PLANNING CALTRANS CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $2,222,000
4.68 $2,259,650
N/A BIJOU MEADOW CONNECTOR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.32 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $474,264
03.01.02.0062 BLACKWOOD ROAD SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.62 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $900,000 03.01.02.0066 CLASS I BIKE TRAIL ‐ PINE BLVD TO END OF LINEAR PARK PATH (MOUNTAIN TO BEACH LOOP PARK AVE WEST) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.25 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,385,000 03.01.02.0082 CLASS I BIKE TRAIL ALONG HIGHWAY 50 FROM H STREET TO THE CITY LIMITS C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.40 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $600,000
03.01.02.0006 CLASS I BIKE TRAIL: THIRD STREET/TAHOE VALLEY ELEMENTARY C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.39 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $75,400 N/A GARDNER MOUNTAIN CONNECTOR PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.08 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $38,000 N/A GLENWOOD WAY SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.25 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $375,000 N/A JOHNSON BLVD SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.98 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,468,786 N/A LYONS AVE CONNECTOR TO MARLETT CIRCLE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.14 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $82,042
03.01.02.0110 MIDDLE SCHOOL SR2S PROJECT ‐ RUFUS ALLEN CONNECTOR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.29 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $435,000 N/A RUFUS ALLEN BLVD SHARED USE PATH SRTS C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.22 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $330,000 N/A SOUTH SHORE TAHOE TRAIL (SOUTH TAHOE BIKEWAY) EXTENSION, OAKLAND AVE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.12 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $360,000 N/A SOUTH SHORE TAHOE TRAIL (SOUTH TAHOE BIKEWAY) MEADOW CONNECTION C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.67 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $2,010,000 N/A SOUTH TAHOE BIKEWAY EXTENSION JAMES CONNECTOR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.03 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $14,250
03.01.02.0081 SOUTH TAHOE GREENWAY "Y" CONNECTOR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.44 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $3,000,000 N/A SOUTH TAHOE HIGH ACCESS ROAD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.15 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $450,000
03.01.02.0063 SPRUCE AVENUE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.36 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $203,000 N/A SR 89 SHARED USE PATH SOUTH TAHOE "Y" TO 15TH ST C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.87 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $504,280 N/A TAHOE VALLEY CONNECTOR PATH DUNLAP C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.16 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $87,000 N/A TAHOE VALLEY ELEMENTARY/WYOMING CONNECTOR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.06 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $34,800 TAHOE VALLEY GREENBELT (B STREET CONNECTOR) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.08 PLANNINGTAHOE VALLEY GREENBELT (BARTON CONNECTOR PATHS) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.00 PLANNINGTAHOE VALLEY GREENBEST (SOUTH AVE BIKE LANE) C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.52 PLANNING C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.19 PLANNINGC‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.04 PLANNING N/A FAIRWAY AVENUE BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.37 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $3,747 N/A GLENWOOD WAY BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.60 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $16,000 N/A JOHNSON BLVD INTERSECTION GAP C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.03 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $339 N/A LAKE PARKWAY EAST (LOOP ROAD) BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.22 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $2,167 N/A LAKE TAHOE BLVD BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.16 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,600 N/A PARK AVE (EAST) BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.06 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $560 N/A PARK AVE BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.20 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $2,022 N/A PINE BLVD BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.31 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $3,059 N/A SKI RUN BLVD BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.59 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $6,000 N/A UPPER TAHOE KEYS BLVD BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.09 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $924 N/A C STREET BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.08 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $217
03.01.02.0070 CLASS III BIKE ROUTE ALONG VENICE DRIVE (FROM TAHOE KEYS TO 15TH STREET) C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.88 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $35,000 N/A COUNCIL ROCK BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.21 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $576 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $6,000,000
03.01.02.0061
CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY
03.01.02.0088
CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY
EL DORADO COUNTY/CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $7,844,000
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $200,000
01.01.01.0012 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
WASHINGTON AVENUE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE Proposed Active Transportation Facilities - Planning Stage 400
EIP PROJECT
NUMBER
PROJECT NAME DESCRIPTION MILES STAGE IMPLEMENTING AGENCY JURISDICTION ESTIMATED COST N/A D STREET BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.69 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,904 N/A DUNLAP DR BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.27 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $741 N/A E STREET BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.11 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $291 N/A FOUNTAIN AVENUE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.27 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $753 N/A GARDNER MOUNTAIN BIKE ROUTE CONNECTION TO POPE BEACH PATH C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 2.25 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $6,198 N/A JAMES AVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.60 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,669 N/A JOHNSON CONNECTOR BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.10 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $286 N/A KYBURZ AVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.48 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,319 N/A LOS ANGELES AVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.19 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $524 N/A MARTIN/BLACK BART BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 1.05 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $2,896 N/A MELBA DRIVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.16 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $434 N/A OAKLAND AVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.71 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,949 N/A SAN FRANCISCO BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.75 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $2,082 N/A SOUTH SHORE TAHOE TRAIL (SOUTH TAHOE BIKEWAY) SUNSET DRIVE CONNECTOR C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.16 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE THAOE $430 N/A SOUTH TAHOE GREENWAY WINNAMUCCA AVE CONNECTOR BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.06 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $161 N/A SPRUCE AVE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.05 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $203,000 N/A TATA LANE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.28 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $783 N/A THIRD STREET BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.40 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $1,116 N/A WINNEMUCCA AVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.13 PLANNING CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $363
23.13 $19,325,932
N/A LPF 2 ‐ ROUND HILL BIKE PATH CONNECTOR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.26 PLANNING DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY $750,000 N/A NEVADA GREENWAY KINGSBURY CONNECTOR VIA MARKET ST C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.77 PLANNING DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY $2,310,000 N/A PINE RIDGE DRIVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.27 PLANNING DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY $749 N/A ROUND HILL BIKE PATH CONNECTOR (ECHO DRIVE) C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.13 PLANNING DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY $371
03.01.02.0079 ROUND HILL BIKE PATH CONNECTOR 2 (ROUND HILL BIKE PATH TO MCFAUL WAY) C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.06 PLANNING DOUGLAS COUNTY DOUGLAS COUNTY $3,000
1.50 $3,064,120
03.01.02.0067 CLASS I BIKE TRAIL ALONG US HIGHWAY 50 FROM CITY LIMITS TO SAWMILL ROAD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.29 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $2,900,000
03.01.02.0041 STATE ROUTE 89 CLASS I BIKE TRAIL ‐ HIGHWAY 50 TO PORTAL ROAD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 2.44 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $3,000,000 N/A NORTH UPPER TRUCKEE/LAKE TAHOE BLVD BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.71 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $7,100 N/A STATE ROUTE 89 BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 2.50 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $24,994 N/A BLITZEN RD BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 1.53 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $4,229 N/A MEADOW VALE/SOUTHERN PINES BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 1.23 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $3,383 N/A MOUNT RAINIER DRIVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.58 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $1,613 N/A OLD LUTHER PASS HIGHWAY C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 2.80 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $7,721 N/A PIONEER CONNECTOR SIGNAGE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.09 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $245 N/A PORTAL DRIVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.16 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $436 N/A SAN BERNADINO (WEST) BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.39 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $1,064 N/A SAN BERNADINO AVE BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.25 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $691 N/A SOUTH UPPER TRUCKEE ROAD BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 4.87 PLANNING EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $13,431
18.83 $5,964,907
N/A VILLAGE GREEN PATHWAY PED/SIDEWALK 0.37 PLANNING IVGID WASHOE COUNTY $300,000
0.37 $300,000
N/A US HWY 50 ( SOUTH SIDE) SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.07 PLANNING NDOT DOUGLAS COUNTY $3,210,000 N/A US HWY 50 SHARED USE PATH (LAKE PARKWAY TO 207) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.27 PLANNING NDOT DOUGLAS COUNTY $157,424 N/A BIKE LANE STATE ROUTE 431 C‐2/BIKE LANE 6.63 PLANNING NDOT WASHOE COUNTY $66,303 N/A US HWY 50 EAST SIDE BIKE LANE STATELINE TO SPOONER C‐2/BIKE LANE 12.22 PLANNING NDOT DOUGLAS COUNTY $122,100 N/A SR 28 CENTRAL CORRIDOR COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 5/COMPLETE STREETS 7.77 PLANNING NDOT/TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT CARSON CITY VARIESN/A SR 28 CRYSTAL BAY COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 5/COMPLETE STREETS 2.30 PLANNING NDOT WASHOE COUNTY VARIES CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
DOUGLAS COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
INCLINE VILLAGE GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Proposed Active Transportation Facilities - Planning Stage 401
EIP PROJECT
NUMBER
PROJECT NAME DESCRIPTION MILES STAGE IMPLEMENTING AGENCY JURISDICTION ESTIMATED COST
30.26 $3,555,827
N/A MULTI‐USE TRAIL TO FIELD #5 C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.13 PLANNING NTPUD PLACER COUNTY $99,000 N/A PINE DROP MULTI‐USE TRAIL WIDENING AND EXTENSION C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.25 PLANNING NTPUD PLACER COUNTY $448,283
1.38 $547,283
03.01.02.0084 BROCKWAY VISTA MULTI‐USE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.82 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $2,430,000 N/A CRYSTAL BAY ‐ COMMUNITY PROPOSES C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.74 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $2,208,484
03.01.02.0086 LAKESIDE BIKE TRAIL PHASE 2C ‐ MACKINAW TO COMMONS BEACH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.16 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $225,000 N/A NATIONAL AVENUE TO PARK C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.53 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $750,000 N/A SHARED USE PATH: SR 267 ‐ STATELINE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.88 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $3,400,000 N/A SR 89 NORTH SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.57 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $1,696,248 N/A TAHOE CITY GOLF COURSE SHARED‐USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.45 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $1,360,031 N/A CARNELIAN WOODS AVE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.47 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $4,726 N/A DONNER RD BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.22 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $620 N/A FOX ST & SPECKLED ST BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 1.16 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $3,205 N/A LAKE FOREST ROAD BIKE ROUTE C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.90 PLANNING PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $2,491
7.90 $12,080,805
03.01.01.0010 NEVADA STATELINE TO STATELINE BIKEWAY LAURA DRIVE TO STATELINE (PHASE 1A) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.88 PLANNING TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT DOUGLAS COUNTY $3,000,000
0.88 $3,000,000
N/A SOUTH SHORE TAHOE TRAIL EXTENSION (SPRING CREEK TO CASCADE) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.59 PLANNING USFS EL DORADO COUNTY $2,610,000
04.01.03.0118 ZEPHYR COVE RESORT CABIN AREA ROADS AND PARKING BMP RETROFIT 5/COMPLETE STREETS 0.49 PLANNING USFS DOUGLAS COUNTY $6,250,000
2.08 $8,860,000
N/A SR 89/28 CORRIDOR COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 5/COMPLETE STREETS 2.02 PLANNING VARIOUS PLACER COUNTY VARIES N/A SR 89 RECREATION CORRIDOR COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 5/COMPLETE STREETS 16.91 PLANNING VARIOUS EL DORADO COUNTY VARIES
18.92 VARIES
N/A ALDER AVE SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.47 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $690,000 N/A BIKE TRAIL LAKESHORE TO 431 C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.49 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $750,000
03.01.02.0083 CLASS I BIKE TRAIL ALONG STATE ROUTE 28 FROM PRESTON FIELD TO NORTHWOOD BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.57 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $750,000 N/A COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.56 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $2,325,000 N/A DRIVER WAY SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.58 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $870,000 N/A FAIRWAY BLVD SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.44 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $660,000 N/A GOLFERS PASS ROAD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.85 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $1,260,000 N/A INCLINE WAY SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.37 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $555,000 N/A MCCOURRY BLVD C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.46 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $690,000 N/A NORTHWOOD BLVD SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.44 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $660,000 N/A OLD MT ROSE HWY SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 2.54 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $3,810,000 N/A SKI WAY SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.73 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $1,095,000 N/A TANAGER STREET C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.09 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $135,000 N/A VILLAGE BLVD SHARED USE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.42 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $630,000 C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.35 PLANNINGC‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.52 PLANNING N/A COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE BIKE LANES SR 28 TO NV 431 C‐2/BIKE LANE 2.68 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $26,700 N/A INCLINE WAY BIKE LANES C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.58 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $5,800 N/A SKI WAY BIKE LANE C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.81 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $1,095,000 N/A VILLAGE BLVD BIKE LANES LAKESHORE TO COUNTRY CLUB C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.50 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $19,100 N/A VILLAGE BLVD BIKE LANES LAKESHORE TO COUNTRY CLUB C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.67 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $19,100 N/A VILLAGE BLVD BIKE LANES LAKESHORE TO COUNTRY CLUB C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.75 PLANNING WASHOE COUNTY WASHOE COUNTY $19,100
16.87 $17,053,191
TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NORTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
PLACER COUNTY
WASHOE COUNTY $988,391
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
VARIOUS (CURRENTLY UNKNOWN)
WASHOE COUNTY
03.01.02.0065 WASHOE COUNTY MASTER PLAN BIKE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS WASHOE COUNTY Proposed Active Transportation Facilities - Planning Stage 402
EIP PROJECT
NUMBER
PROJECT NAME DESCRIPTION MILES STAGE IMPLEMENTING AGENCY JURISDICTION ESTIMATED COST N/A US HWY 50 ‐ MEYERS PATH EXTENSION C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.46 DESIGN CALTRANS EL DORADO COUNTY $675,000
0.46 $675,000
C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.40C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.55
03.01.02.0094 LAKE TAHOE BOULEVARD CLASS I BIKE TRAIL (VIKING WAY TO SOUTH WYE) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.79 DESIGN CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $4,250,000 N/A PONDEROSA/SUSSEX CONNECTOR TO SIERRA TRACT C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.07 DESIGN CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $28,500 N/A SOUTH TAHOE GREENWAY SHARED USE TRAIL CONNECTOR C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.45 DESIGN CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $213,750,000
03.01.01.0019 PIONEER TRAIL PEDESTRIAN PROJECT ‐ PHASE II SIDEWALK 0.46 DESIGN CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $2,110,000
3.71 $222,518,880
01.01.01.0115 BURKE CREEK WATERSHED STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS (KAHLE COMPLETE STREETS IMPROVEMENTS) 5/COMPLETE STREETS 0.88 DESIGN DOUGLAS COUNTY/NTCD DOUGLAS COUNTY $2,250,000
0.88 $2,250,000
03.01.02.0141 FALLEN LEAF ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND RECREATIONAL ACCESS PROJECT C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 3.16 DESIGN EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $3,115,028
03.01.02.0087 SOUTH TAHOE GREENWAY SHARED USE TRAIL PHASES 1B & 2 C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.92 DESIGN EL DORADO COUNTY CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $5,500,000
03.01.01.0004 APACHE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY PROJECT 5/COMPLETE STREETS 0.40 DESIGN EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $1,873,650
03.01.02.0074 MEYERS CORRIDOR OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 5/COMPLETE STREETS 1.13 FULLY FUNDED EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $12,807,903
5.61 $23,296,581
03.01.02.0064 NEVADA STATELINE TO STATELINE BIKEWAY ‐ CRYSTAL BAY TO INCLINE C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 2.14 DESIGN NDOT WASHOE COUNTY $20,000,000
2.14 $20,000,000
N/A MULTI‐USE TRAIL TO DOG PARK AND TENNIS COURTS C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.28 DESIGN NTPUD PLACER COUNTY $192,626
0.28 $192,626
03.01.02.0011 NORTH TAHOE REGIONAL BIKE TRAIL C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 7.79 DESIGN PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $12,000,000
03.01.02.0118 TAHOE CITY DOWNTOWN ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS 5/COMPLETE STREETS 1.46 DESIGN PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $5,000,000
03.01.02.0125 WEST SHORE HIGHWAY CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS 5/COMPLETE STREETS 5.97 FULLY FUNDED PLACER COUNTY PLACER COUNTY $510,000
15.22 $17,510,000
03.01.02.0093 NEVADA STATELINE TO STATELINE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS ‐ GLENBROOK ENTRANCE TO ROUND HILL PINES BEACH (BIKEWAY PHASE 4) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 9.53 DESIGN TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT DOUGLAS COUNTY $32,000,000
03.01.02.0049 SR 28 CENTRAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS ‐ SAND HARBOR TO SPOONER STATE PARK (BIKEWAY PHASE 3) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 7.54 DESIGN TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT/USFS CARSON CITY $60,150,000
17.06 $92,150,000
03.01.02.0044 BALDWIN BEACH BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.48 DESIGN USFS EL DORADO COUNTY $272,600
04.01.03.0112 CAMP RICHARDSON RESORT & CAMPGROUND BMPS & RETROFIT C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.55 FULLY FUNDED USFS EL DORADO COUNTY $6,500,000
03.01.02.0138 MEEKS BAY HIGHWAY CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.16 DESIGN USFS EL DORADO COUNTY $1,500,000
03.01.02.0045 POPE BEACH BIKE PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.17 DESIGN USFS EL DORADO COUNTY $92,80001.01.04.0014 TALLAC HISTORIC SITE, VALHALLA, AND THE VISITOR CENTER IMPROVEMENTS C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 0.80 FULLY FUNDED USFS EL DORADO COUNTY $11,100,000
03.01.02.0141 FALLEN LEAF ROAD PAVEMENT REHABLITATION AND RECREATIONAL ACCESS PROJECT C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.24 DESIGN USFS / EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $4,740,000
2.40 $24,205,400
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
03.01.02.0005 AL TAHOE SAFETY AND MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FULLY FUNDED CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE $2,380,380 UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
DOUGLAS COUNTY/NEVADA TAHOE CONSERVATION DISTRICT
EL DORADO COUNTY
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NORTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
PLACER COUNTY
TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Proposed Active Transportation Facilities - Design Stage 403
EIP PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DESCRIPTION MILES STAGE IMPLEMENTING AGENCY JURISDICTION ESTIMATED COST
03.01.02.0016 SR 89/FANNY BRIDGE COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT ‐ PHASE 2 COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND MEEKS BAY PATH C‐2/BIKE LANE 4.08 IMPLEMENTATION CALTRANS PLACER COUNTY $36,000 C‐2/BIKE LANE 1.89 IMPLEMENTATIONSIDEWALK 1.74 IMPLEMENTATION
5.97 $38,505,000
SIERRA BOULEVARD COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT (US HIGHWAY 50 TO BARBARA AVENUE) C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 1.08 IMPLEMENTATION
SIERRA BLVD COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT (US 50 TO BARBARA AVE) C‐2/BIKE LANE 0.04 IMPLEMENTATION
1.12 $6,234,127
01.01.01.0117 ELKS CLUB DRIVE CAPITAL OVERLAY REHABILITATION PROJECT C‐3/BIKE ROUTE 0.80 IMPLEMENTATION EL DORADO COUNTY EL DORADO COUNTY $1,000,000
10.76 $1,000,000
03.01.02.0016 SR 89/FANNY BRIDGE COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT ‐ PHASE 2 COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND MEEKS BAY PATH C‐1/SHARED USE PATH 3.22 IMPLEMENTATION TAHOE TRANSPORTATION EL DORADO COUNTY $5,400,000
3.22 $5,400,000
$38,469,000
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
03.01.02.0004 $6,234,127 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
US HIGHWAY 50 WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ‐ ""Y"" TO TROUT CREEK
01.01.02.0003 CALTRANS CITY OF SOUTH LAKE
TAHOE
Proposed Active Transportation Facilities - Implementation Stage 404
EIP NUMBER INTERSECTION OWNER STAGE ESTIMATED COST IMPLEMENTING AGENCY N/A SR 267/COMMONWEALTH DR AND KINGSWOOD DR CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANS N/A SR 28 AT BASECAMP TAHOE CITY CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANSN/A SR 28/BEAVER ST CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANSN/A SR 28/JACKPINE ST CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANS N/A SR 28/LAUREL DR CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANSN/A SR 28/PARK LN CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANSN/A SR 28/ROBERT AVE CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANS N/A SR 28/SECLINE ST CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANSN/A SR 89/5TH ST CALTRANS DESIGN VARIES CALTRANSN/A SR 89/FAIRWAY DR CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANSN/A SR 89/MOUNTAIN DR CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANS N/A US HWY 50/BIGLER AVE CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANS US HWY 50/CARSON AVE CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANS
N/A US HWY 50/LODI AVE CALTRANS IMPLEMENTATION VARIES CALTRANS N/A US HWY 50/MODESTO AVE CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANSN/A US HWY 50/MOTEL 6 AND GROCERY OUTLET CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANS
01.01.02.0003 US HWY 50/SIERRA BLVD CALTRANS IMPLEMENTATION VARIES CALTRANS N/A US HWY 50/WHISKEY DICKS CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CALTRANSN/A AL TAHOE BLVD/COLLEGE BLVD/JOHNSON BLVD CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PLANNING VARIES CSLT N/A JOHNSON BLVD/MARLETTE CIR SOUTH CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PLANNING VARIES CSLT N/A PIONEER TRAIL/EDNA ST CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE DESIGN VARIES CSLT
03.001.02.0005 US HWY 50/AL TAHOE BLVD CALTRANS DESIGN $2,380,380 CSLT/CALTRANS N/A US HWY 50/B ST CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES CSLTN/A LAKE TAHOE BLVD/BOULDER MOUNTAIN CT EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING VARIES EL DORADON/A N UPPER TRUCKEE RD/E SAN BERNADINO AVE EL DORADO COUNTY DESIGN VARIES EL DORADON/A PIONEER TRAIL/GLEN EAGLES RD EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING VARIES EL DORADO
03.01.01.0004 US HWY 50/APACHE AVE CALTRANS DESIGN $1,873,650 EL DORADO N/A US HWY 50/JEWELL RD NORTH CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES EL DORADO US HWY 50/AGRICULTURAL INSPECTION STATIONUS HWY 50/PIONEER TRAIL MEYERSUS HWY 50/N UPPER TRUCKEE RDUS HWY 50/S UPPER TRUCKEE RD DESIGN $12,807,903 EL DORADO
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
03.01.02.0074
MEYERS CORRIDOR OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS
CALTRANS
Proposed Intersection Improvements
405
EIP NUMBER INTERSECTION OWNER STAGE ESTIMATED COST IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
03.01.01.0018 US HWY 50/SR 89 LUTHER PASS RD CALTRANS DESIGN $5,240,000 EL DORADO COUNTY/CALTRANS N/A SR 207/ANSALDO ACRES RD NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOT
N/A SR 207/S BENJAMIN DR NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOTN/A SR 28/AMAGOSA RD AND GONAWABIE RD NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOTN/A SR 28/US HWY 50 NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOTN/A SR 431/2ND CREEK DR NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOT N/A SR 431/MARLETTE WAY NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOT
N/A US HWY 50/CEDARBROOK NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOTN/A US HWY 50/FRIEDHOFF RD NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOTN/A US HWY 50/HIDDEN WOODS DR NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOT N/A US HWY 50/KAHLE DR DOUGLAS/NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOTN/A US HWY 50/KELLY CIR NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOT N/A US HWY 50/LAKEVIEW DR NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOTN/A US HWY 50/MARTIN DR NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOTN/A US HWY 50/WARRIOR WAY NDOT DESIGN $2,200,000 NDOTN/A US HWY 50/ZEPHYR POINT ENTRANCE NDOT PLANNING VARIES NDOT
04.01.03.0137 US 50/ROUND HILL PINES BEACH ENTRANCE NDOT DESIGN $3,000,000 NDOT/CENTRAL FEDERAL LANDS03.01.02.0072 SR 28/GROVE ST PLACER/CALTRANS DESIGN $570,000 PLACER COUNTY/CALTRANS
03.01.01.0015 SR 28/N SHORE BLVD PLACER/CALTRANS DESIGN $5,750,000 PLACER COUNTY/CALTRANS N/A ELKS AVE/ELKS POINT RD NDOT/DOUGLAS PLANNING VARIES UNDETERMINED N/A SR 89/ POPE BEACH RD USFS/CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES UNDETERMINEDN/A SR 89/EAGLE FALLS PARKING CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES UNDETERMINED N/A SR 89/HERITAGE WAY USFS/CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES UNDETERMINEDN/A SR 89/INSPIRATION POINT CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES UNDETERMINED N/A SR 89/JAMESON BEACH RD USFS/CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES UNDETERMINEDN/A SR 89/MEEKS BAY RESORT ENTRANCE CALTRANS PLANNING VARIES UNDETERMINED N/A SR 89/VIKINGSHOLM PARKING CALTRANS/CA STATE PARKS PLANNING VARIES UNDETERMINED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (UNDETERMINED)
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS EL DORADO COUNTY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
PLACER COUNTY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
Proposed Intersection Improvements
406
linkingtahoe.com
View the plan online: trpa.org/activetransportationplan 407
City of South Lake Tahoe
1 Active Transportation Prioritized Project List
Developed with input from the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) 408
Existing Plan: Inventory of
proposed projects
2 Active Transportation Projects Identified in:
- City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan (2011)
- Tahoe Valley Area Plan (2014, update pending)
- Tourist Core Area Plan (2013, update pending)
- South Lake Tahoe Parks, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan (2014) - LTUSD Safe Routes to School – Middle School Connectivity Plan (2015) - TRPA Active Transportation Plan (2018, 2024 update pending) Formerly the 2010 Lake Tahoe Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan - Tahoe Regional Trails Strategy (2023)
409
Regional Planning Documents
3 410
City Planning Documents
4 Planning Update in progress for
the City’s adopted Area Plans:
• Tahoe Valley Area Plan
• Tourist Core Area Plan
411
BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE PROCESS
5 The BAC developed a series of ranking criteria to assist with prioritizing the list of projects. The criteria that the BAC developed are as follows:
• Does the project create a link between two existing
projects?
• Will the project have a high volume of users?
• Does the project help to enhance safety with
improvements in high traffic or high stress areas?
• Is the project feasible in terms of funding, acquisition or construction challenges?
• Does the project provide access for community
members in an equitable way?
412
Project List and Funding
6 Priority
Group
(1-4)
Total
Funding
Needed
Secured
Funding
Unfunded
Need
Priority 1A $42.4 M $25.5 M $16.9 M
Priority 1B $25 M $0 $25 M
Priority 2 $39 M $0 $39 M
Priority 3&4 $32.6 M $0 $32.6 M
TOTAL $139 M $25.5 M $113.5 M
413
Past Success
7 Year
Complete
Project Total Cost City Funding
2014 Harrison Avenue Streetscape and Bike Trail $7.1 Million $ 4 Million (56%) 2017 El Dorado to Ski Run Bike Path $4 Million $777,500 (20%) 2018 Dennis Machida Phase 1a (Glenwood to Herbert)
– constructed by CTC
$921,230 $0 (0%)
2018 Al Tahoe Safety and Mobility Enhancement
Project
$3.0 Million $ 65,400 (2%)
2019 Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets Project $6.8 Million $483,000 2022 Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class 1 Bicycle Trail (Viking Way)
$5.3 Million $1.2 Million (22%)
2022 South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail Phases
1b & 2 (Constructed by CTC and El Dorado
County)
5.8 Million $0 (0%)
TOTAL $33 Million $ 6.6 Million (20.2%)
414
8 Bicycle Advisory Committee
(BAC)
Map of prioritized Active
Transportation Projects
415
BIJOU PARK MULTIUSE CONNECTOR PATH
9 BUDGET
Project Cost: $1.8 Million
Fully Funded
Status: In design, funded through
Implementation (expected in 2025)
416
DENNIS MACHIDA MEMORIAL GREENWAY
Phase 1c (Hebert to Ski Run)
10 BUDGET
Project Cost: $9.5 Million
Funding Needed: $8.4 Million
(Construction - Date TBD)
Status: $800k Grant Funding Secured for
Environmental and Preliminary Design
417
PIONEER TRAIL PEDESTRIAN PROJECT – PHASE II
11 BUDGET
Project Cost: $6.1 Million
Funding Needed: $0
Status: 100% Plans are complete,
acquisitions underway – anticipated
start 2024
418
TATA LANE/B STREET CONNECTOR
12 BUDGET
Project Cost: $2 Million
Status: Tied to Sugar Pine Village, funded
through Implementation (expected in
2026)
419
TAHOE VALLEY GREENBELT
13 BUDGET
Project Cost: $15M
Funding Needed: $0
Status: Implementation starting 2024
420
PALMIRA TO BIKEWAY
14 BUDGET
Project Cost: $1.3M
Funding Needed: $1.3M
Status: Unfunded, Date - TBD
421
QUESTIONS?
15 422
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:14
Agenda Item: Mid-Town Area Plan Kick-off Presentation
Executive Summary: The City is embarking on the creation of the Mid-Town Area Plan to direct development in central South Lake Tahoe as directed by Strategic Plan Priority 1,.2, Mid-Town Revitalization. Staff will be presenting an initial project timeline and scope to inform City Council and the public on timeframes for outreach and public engagement, key elements of the planning process, and current conditions under existing regulatory framework. This is an information only item; no direction is requested.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive and File.
Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Senior Planner
Reviewed and Approved By: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Mid-Town Area Plan Kick-off.docx
02-Mid-Town Area Plan Project Scope.docx
04-AB 930 Letter of Support.docx
05-Mid-Town Area Plan Boundary.pdf
03-Mid-Town Area Plan Project Timeline.docx
423
City Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Mid-Town Area Plan Kick-off
Location: Mid-Town (see attachment 05, Mid-Town Area Plan Boundary) Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Senior Planner
Background: The City Council's Strategic Plan Priority 1, Built Environment, Action Item 1.2 is to revitalize the Mid-Town area. The City is initiating development of the Mid-Town Area Plan to guide future land uses and development to meet the needs of residents, businesses, visitors, and the environment. The Mid-Town Area Plan (Area Plan) will leverage the adopted 56-acre master plan and existing infrastructure at Lakeview Commons and Harrison Avenue to further transform midtown into a recreation, arts, and community hub.
This item was brought before Council various times in 2023 for direction regarding staffing and project management. Rather than hire a consultant or limited-term staff to lead the Mid-Town planning effort, Council directed the City Manager to recruit a full-time Senior Planner. After multiple unsuccessful solicitations, the position has been filled.
Issue and Discussion: The timeline for development of the plan, as well as key elements of the planning process are presented in this report. Adoption of the plan by City Council is estimated to occur in June 2025, and by TRPA in the following months. A complete timeline is included as Attachment 03 and is subject to change.
Staff is currently identifying stakeholders and community groups. A dedicated effort will be made to include under represented communities and those traditionally not brought into planning processes.
Upon project kick-off, staff will be developing an effective and inclusive community engagement and outreach plan. Tasks will include meeting preparation, public noticing and outreach, presentations for use on the City website, and facilitating meetings alongside City staff. The majority of outreach will be conducted in August and September of 2024 following initial direction from City Council on June 4th.
Attachment 02 is the current project scope. The scope includes an initial plan vision as discussed briefly in previous Council meetings and as described in the 2023-2028 Strategic Plan. As community and stakeholder input is heard the vision for the area will become more defined and inform policy direction. One identified priority for the Mid-Town area, highlighted by the Vacant and Underused Sites Inventory, is economic activity and redevelopment. Seventeen (17) of the 40 sites identified in the report are located within the Mid-Town Area Plan’s proposed boundary. To address these sites and prevent further instances of abandon, a concerted effort will be made to incorporate implementation strategies to achieve the plan’s goals in a timely manner. 424
City Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 2 of 3
The South Tahoe Association of Realtors (STAR) was awarded professional assistance through NAR in the form of The Counselors of Real Estate (CRE). As a stakeholder in the process, CRE will conduct onsite assessments of the area and provide analysis and recommendations for economic development and redevelopment strategies. These recommendations may be considered by the City Council for inclusion into the plan.
Staff has identified proposed Assembly Bill 930, a modernized approach to redevelopment agencies, as possible implementation tool. The bill would authorize two (2) or more legislative bodies to form a joint Reinvestment in Infrastructure for a Sustainable and Equitable California (RISE) district. As proposed by the bill, jurisdictions that form RISE Districts would have access to loans from the state, as available, to jumpstart transit-oriented infill development and supportive infrastructure. Additionally, the district would have access to tax increment financing. Staff is recommending that Mayor Bass authorize City Manager Joe Irvin to sign a letter of support for AB 930 (Attachment 04).
The scope includes a summary of the Bijou/Al Tahoe Community Plan, Plan Area Statement 103 (Sierra Tract Commercial), and Plan Area Statement 101 (Bijou Meadows). These documents currently direct development for the parcels to be incorporated into the Mid-Town Area Plan. While Council direction is not to be provided today, understanding the existing framework can help to identify the desired goals and policies for a re-envisioned Mid-Town.
Based on stakeholder and community input, Design Workshop will explore a district approach for the area to include design and character for massing, scale and form for how future growth could be accommodated centered around mobility, open space, housing, economic development, and fiscal impacts. Design Workshop has been asked to prepare an updated work plan and cost estimate that will be brought to Council at a later date. The City will also seek a consultant to conduct technical analyses during CEQA preparation.
Financial Implications: Beyond staff time, there are no financial implications associated with receiving this report. Any Professional Services Agreements (PSA) for consulting services will be brought to City Council for consideration at a future date.
Environmental Considerations: Reporting the status of a planning process has no possibility of causing a direct physical change or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment. This activity is not a project as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15778 and is not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
Possible environmental impacts will be considered as goals, policies, and standards are developed to create a self-mitigating plan to the extent feasible. A programmatic Initial Study and Initial Environmental Checklist (IS/IEC) is envisioned to be the appropriate environmental document for evaluation of the Area Plan pursuant to CEQA and TRPA Code of Ordinances and Rules of Procedures.
Policy Implications: Preparing an Area Plan for the Mid-Town is consistent with the following General Plan policies:
Policy LU-1.2 Smart Growth: The City shall implement Smart Growth principles to create walkable, mixed-use centers, compact and complete neighborhoods, and enhanced gateways and places.
Smart Growth Principles include:
425
City Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 3 of 3
- Creating a range of housing opportunities and choices - Creating walkable neighborhoods
- Encouraging community and stakeholder collaboration
- Fostering distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place - Making development decisions predictable, fair, and cost-effective - Providing a mix of land uses
- Preserving open space, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas - Providing a variety of transportation choices
- Strengthening and directing development to existing communities - Taking advantage of compact building design
Policy LU-2.2 Community Plan Preparation, Adoption, and Implementation: The City shall periodically update and implement the four Community Plans as a way to focus development commodities and revitalization efforts.
Policy LU-2.5 Bijou/Al Tahoe Community Plan Area: The City shall encourage the creation of a viable residential neighborhood with appropriate neighborhood amenities and compatible highquality family-oriented recreation and public facilities, including government offices.
Policy LU-2.8 Community Plan Incentives: The City shall provide permit streamlining, commodity increases, coverage increases, and other similar incentives to encourage the implementation of General Plan goals and policies.
Policy LU-5.3 Commercial Center Enhancement: The City shall encourage the upgrade and/or expansion of existing commercial centers, including improvements to parking and landscaping areas; redesigns to accommodate bicycle, pedestrians, and transit facilities; and remodeling to include "green" technology and improve energy efficiency.
Policy LU-8.14 Art in Public Places: The City shall promote art in public places such as pedestrian areas, tourist accommodation areas, social gathering places, and commercial shopping centers in conformance with a Cultural Arts Master Plan.
Policy LU-11.2 Equal Public Participation: The City shall ensure that all community residents have meaningful opportunities to participate in the decision-making process. 426
Development Services Department
1052 Tata Lane │ South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 │ (530) 542-6010 │www.cityofslt.us Mid-Town Area Plan Project Scope
Vision
The goal of the Mid-Town Area Plan (Area Plan) is to foster a more defined sense of place in central South Lake Tahoe to facilitate ease and pleasure of residents going about their daily lives and give visitors a glimpse of the rich community and culture of South Lake Tahoe’s current and past residents. The abundance of recreation opportunities is what draws people to visit and reside in the Tahoe Basin. Within the Area Plan’s proposed boundary are some of the City’s most valuable recreation resources, including El Dorado Beach and Lakeview Commons, Bijou Community Park and Golf Course, and the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Center and Ice Arena. The Area Plan will leverage the recently completed 56-Acre Master Plan and existing and proposed infrastructure to provide opportunities for year-round recreation to those of all ages, incomes, and ability.
PLACEMAKING
El Dorado Beach and Lakeview
Commons provide unobstructed
views of Lake Tahoe from Lake
Tahoe Boulevard (Hwy 50) and are
a major contributing factor to this
stretch of the road’s Scenic
Roadway attainment status. The
Plan will include updated
development and design
standards to further identify the
mid-town area as a community
hub and increase scenic quality.
The City will seek stakeholder and
community input to strike a
balance for design standards that
not only convey the City’s historic
mountain community identity, but also provide flexibility for modern buildings that developers are excited to create. Design standards will consider pedestrian and bicycle circulation with minimal vehicle interference, building orientation and entrances at a Figure 1: El Dorado Beach Circa 1971
427
2 pedestrian scale, and approaches to maximize conditioned floor space and encourage higher density housing within coverage limitations.
In addition to the natural beauty the area offers, the plan will designate an arts district to highlight the beauty and complexity of our multifaceted community. Too often the identity of our residents is oversimplified, and the original stewards of the area overlooked. It will create a space for residents and visitors alike to learn, explore, engage, be inspired, ad bridge generational and cultural divides. The establishment of an arts district not only enhances aesthetic appeal, but also deepens our understanding of what it means to be part of a vibrant and diverse community.
Bringing housing to Mid-Town is key to the success of the goals of the Area Plan, General Plan, and the City’s climate goals. Many of the parcels to be included in this plan are in community plans or plan area statements that focus on commercial uses.
They were developed between 1985 and 1995, when housing was much more available than it is today. Creating greater residential density in Mid-Town is an important step towards a community where affordable housing is no longer scarce, where ridership can support fixed-route public transportation, the environment is cleaner and safer, and where community thrives.
Current Regulatory Setting and Applicable Plans
There are multiple planning documents that direct development of lands within the proposed plan area boundary. The intent of the Mid-Town Area Plan is to combine these planning areas under one comprehensive plan to facilitate revitalization of this area into a recreation, arts, and community hub. Contents of the existing documents will be evaluated by staff, stakeholder groups, and the public to determine what elements of the plans are desired to remain or be updated.
REGULATORY SETTING
The City of South Lake Tahoe operates within the policy and regulatory framework of both the State of California and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA). The Area Plan will meet California requirements for specific plans and to facilitate the implementation of development goals and policies by establishing zoning districts, Standards, and criteria for development. The distribution, location, and extent of planned land uses will be consistent with the adopted City General Plan and TRPA Regional Plan.
TRPA Code of Ordinances Section 13.4 allows local jurisdictions to develop area plans that supersede TRPA plans and ordinances so long as the area plan is consistent with the TRPA Regional Plan. TRPA will be an active participant in plan development, with both staff level input and feedback from the Advisory Planning Commission and Governing Board. After adoption of the plan by the City, the TRPA Governing Board must also adopt the plan.
428
3 BIJOU/AL TAHOE COMMUNITY PLAN
Most parcels to be included in the plan are currently under the Bijou/Al Tahoe Community Plan, which will be incorporated into the Area Plan in its entirety. This document was adopted in October of 1995 and was only intended to be in place until 2007. The plan’s primary areas of focus were infrastructure improvements to commercial and tourist uses, incorporation of bicycle and pedestrian transportation infrastructure, and expanded recreation opportunities, such as improved lake access, campground expansion, and extensions of bike trail systems. Certain parcels within the Bijou/Al Tahoe Community Plan owned by the City and by El Dorado County receive additional guidance from the 56-Acre Master Plan. This plan, last amended in 2022, guides development for new and improved public facilities. This document will remain in place.
BIJOU MEADOWS PLAN AREA STATEMENT
Parcels from the Bijou Meadows Plan Area Statement (PAS 101) will make up the second largest portion of the proposed plan area and consist of the Bijou Golf Course, Bijou Meadow, and Bijou Community Park (PAS 101, Special Area #1). Because these areas are zoned for recreation, permissible uses are quite limited and are not anticipated to undergo significant change; however, extensive discussions will be had regarding expansion and reconfiguration of the existing facilities.
TAHOE SIERRA (SIERRA TRACT) PLAN AREA STATEMENT
The Sierra Tract Plan Area Statement (PAS), now known as the Tahoe Sierra neighborhood, is the last commercial area in the City that is not included in an area or community plan. The PAS includes permissible uses and densities for parcels within, while all other standards default to City Code. A modified use list and updated design standards will help transform this area into well-rounded neighborhood center.
Planning Process and Approach
Staff is estimating completion of the Mid-Town Area Plan by May 2025, with City Council and TRPA Governing Board adoption in the following months. Planning efforts will be led by the senior planner with internal coordination and consultant aid in areas specified below.
Following the Mid-Town Area Plan Kick Off at City Council on May 7, 2024, staff will continue to identify stakeholder groups, create outreach materials, do initial land use analyses, and outline the plan document. Throughout June and July, planning will work closely with Public Works staff to identify priority transportation, public safety, and water quality improvement projects. The Parks and Recreation Department will be included in discussions regarding the future of Bijou Park, Golf Course, and Meadow with a Bijou Park Community Advisory Group. These meetings will focus on big picture goals for the spaces, while a separate implementation effort is led by Parks and Recreation.
429
4 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
The majority of outreach will occur in August and September at a variety of venues, including but not limited to City Council, Planning Commission, TRPA boards and commissions, recreation center, community events, and virtual platforms. A concerted effort will be made to include those not traditionally brought into planning processes.
Community meetings are often dominated by business owners, retirees, homeowners, and the middle aged. The feedback received from these groups is valuable; however, it is not representative of all the ways our City is experienced. To engage our high school and college age population, the student representative of South Tahoe High School and student groups from Lake Tahoe Community College will be included and receive regular project updates should they wish. This sector of our community holds a valuable perspective that is not heard often enough.
On May 16, 2023, the City adopted a Land Acknowledgement paying formal recognition to the Waší∙šiw (Washoe Tribe) as the traditional stewards of the land upon which the City is built. The land acknowledgement was a first step towards meaningful engagement and collaboration with the Washoe Tribe which we hope to further cultivate throughout this process. Staff will hear from tribal members on how the plan can uplift the vision, success, and vibrancy of the Washoe Nation. The 56-Acre Master Plan identifies the area as containing opportunities to increase community and visitors’ understanding and appreciation of Washoe culture and traditions but does not speak to the tribal community directly. The Mid-Town Area Plan is an opportunity to not only acknowledge the Washoe Tribe, but also reincorporate tribal culture, practices, and values in the evolution of the City.
Other major stakeholder groups include local governments, community development and housing organizations, educational institutions, local business owners, community wellness organizations, environmental advocacy groups, recreation users, and public safety entities.
IMPLEMENTATION
Oftentimes area plans lack mechanisms to implement their goals and visions. The plan is created, and execution is left in the hand of developers to bring forth projects. Likewise, a property owner’s lack of interest in selling can cause a parcel or entire area to become stagnant. Seventeen (17) of the 40 sites identified in the City’s Vacant and Underused Sites Inventory (presented to Council on January 9, 2024) are located within the MidTown Area Plan’s proposed boundary. If private property owners have no incentive to improve, redevelop, or sell an underused parcel, execution of the community vision becomes difficult and delayed. To encourage private landowners to participate in community revitalization, the area plan will explore incentives and mechanisms to spur application of the plan within a timely manner.
430
5 In February 2023 Assembly Bill 930 was introduced as a modernized approach to redevelopment agencies. The bill would authorize two (2) or more legislative bodies to form a joint Reinvestment in Infrastructure for a Sustainable and Equitable California (RISE) district. Jurisdictions that form RISE Districts would have access to tax increment financing and loans from the state, as available, to jumpstart transit-oriented infill development and supportive infrastructure. The bill as currently written would require that at least half of the funding received by the district be spent on infill supportive infrastructure (utility upgrades, environmental cleanup, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, transit facilities and investments, and housing infrastructure that is necessary to facilitate new infill housing or mixed-use development) and that at least 30% of the funds be spent on residential units that are restricted to persons and families of low or moderate income. Redevelopment districts were instrumental to the fruition and success of Heavenly Village, and staff believe this approach could result in comparable success for mid-town. The goals of this legislation are in alignment with City’s goals and needs and would assist in achieving the necessary steps to transform Mid-Town into a vibrant town center.
City staff has heard from stakeholder group the South Tahoe Association of Realtors (STAR) that redevelopment and economic activation is a priority. In July STAR will host individuals from The Counselors of Real Estate (CRE), a service awarded to STAR through the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Transforming Neighborhoods Program. After the visit, CRE will provide a report with recommendations to spur revitalization, areawide economic development, and site-specific redevelopment strategies. The report will be a valuable perspective to the City. Should any recommendations align with the City’s goals and direction for the area, they may be included in the plan.
CONSULTANT ASSISTANCE
Staff is anticipating consultant aid in two main categories. Design Workshop has been asked to prepare an updated work plan and cost estimate. Staff is seeking support in developing a community engagement and stakeholder plan. Tasks include meeting preparation, public noticing and outreach, presentations for use on the city website, and facilitating meetings alongside City staff. After these meetings and with a clear understanding of community and stakeholder objectives, Deign Workshop will prove high level bubble diagrams to describe different scenarios for the future of Mid-Town using variables centered around mobility, open space, housing, economic development, and fiscal impacts. Design Workshop will also play a large role in drafting design standards. They will explore a district approach for the area to include design and character for massing, scale and form for how future growth could be accommodated. 431
Mid-Town Area Plan Projected Timeline
Timeframe Priority Month
April 2024 Background – Develop project description and timeline, issue letter of intent to TRPA. 0
May 2024
City Council Kick-Off – Inform City Council and the public that the Mid-Town Area Plan planning process is beginning and share the proposed timeline.
Establish Stakeholders – Identify stakeholder groups, develop outreach materials and strategies.
1 June – July 2024
City Council Meeting June 4 – Consider consultant PSA and scope of work.
Outline Document – Begin drafting background information for the plan and outlining document.
Internal Coordination – Consult with other City departments regarding plan development and implementation, primarily Parks and Recreation and Public Works.
Counselors of Real Estate (CRE) Site Visit – Assist STAR in providing CRE with a tour of the plan area.
2-3
August –
September 2024
Outreach and Community Engagement – Conduct outreach
through public meetings and stakeholder meetings at a variety of venues, including but not limited to City Council, Planning Commission, TRPA boards and commissions, recreation center, community events, virtual platforms, high school, etc.
Tribal Consultation – In addition to being included in stakeholder outreach, the City will consult with tribes pursuant to AB 52. 4-5
October –
November 2024
Draft Plan – Begin drafting development standards, permissible use tables, density tables, implementation strategies, and other plan elements based on stakeholder input and Council direction.
Continue Regular Meetings with Advisory Groups
6-7
December 2024 Refine Scope – Revisit stakeholder groups, Planning Commission, and City Council with draft standards. 8
January – March
2025
CEQA – Conduct environmental analysis and prepare CEQA
documents. 9-11
April 2025 Circulate CEQA – Circulate CEQA documents and receive public comment. 12
May 2025 Finalize Documents – Conduct final edits and clean-up of the plan and CEQA documents. 13
June 2025 Planning Commission Recommendation and City Council Adoption – Exact meeting dates TBD 14
July – August 2025 TRPA Adoption – Exact meeting dates TBD 15-16 432
Assemblymember Laura Friedman
1020 N Street, Room 5150
Sacramento, California 95814
Re: Support for AB 930 (Friedman) Local Government: Reinvestment in Infrastructure for a Sustainable and Equitable California (RISE) Act 2023.
Dear Assemblymember Friedman,
On behalf of the City Council of South Lake Tahoe, I am pleased to express the City s strong support of Assembly Bill 930 (AB 930). This bill would authorize the legisla?ve bodies of two (2) or more ci?es or coun?es to jointly form a Reinvestment in Infrastructure for a Sustainable and Equitable California district (RISE district) to unlock tax increment financing for infrastructure and equitable development in loca?on-efficient areas. AB 930 would encourage collabora?on between public and private en??es and empower local governments to be catalysts for inclusive growth and community revitaliza?on.
As the City of South Lake Tahoe embarks on development of the Mid-Town Area Plan, we seek to bring a mul?tude of housing op?ons and suppor?ve infrastructure to the Citys core. Redevelopment districts were instrumental to the frui?on and success of Heavenly Village, and we believe AB 930 could result in comparable success for mid-town.
AB930 comes at a cri?cal ?me when local governments, such as the City of South Lake Tahoe, are working hard to address the housing crisis, promote infill development, and to facilitate climate-resilient housing. Infrastructure throughout the city is in need of maintenance and upgrades in the City. This challenge impacts mee?ng housing goals, economic development, and maintaining lake clarity and sustainability throughout the Lake Tahoe Region.
Thank you for your leadership in addressing this cri?cal need for tax increment financing to build infrastructure for a sustainable future with mobility choice and more livable communi?es in our state.
Sincerely,
Joe Irvin, City Manager
433
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
MID-TOWN AREA PLAN BOUNDARY
Sierra Tahoe
Commercial
Bijou/Al Tahoe
Community Plan
Bijou
Community
Park
Bijou
Golf Course
& Meadow
Bijou/Al Tahoe
Community Plan
Bijou/Al Tahoe
Community Plan
434
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:15
Agenda Item: Participatory Budgeting
Executive Summary: The City Council will consider preparation of a participatory budgeting survey to engage the community and receive feedback on priority projects for funding.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion directing staff to implement a participatory budgeting survey using the identified projects as options for prioritizing the allocation of funds.
Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Assistant City Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report
02-Participatory Budget Project List
435
Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Participatory Budgeting
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Assistant City Manager Background: As part of the mid-year budget adoption discussion on March 12, 2024, the City Council directed the City Manager to reengage in community polling for input on use of excess funds.
Issue and Discussion: In 2021 the City utilized the participatory budget platform developed by the Stanford Crowdsourced Democracy Team to conduct a survey to solicit community input on priorities for funding projects with American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. City staff is recommending utilizing the same platform for the excess funds prioritization survey. The platform will allow a participant to allocate $2 million in funds among a list of projects, with some projects allowing for a sliding scale of funding, which will reflect the scope of implementation. The recommended list of projects and funding is included as attachment 02.
This list includes Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) recommended by the CIP Committee and active transportation projects recommended by the Bicycle Advisory Committee for funding in the 2024/2025 budget. These projects have been selected for the participatory budgeting survey based on their alignment with City Strategic Plan priorities.
Upon direction from City Council to proceed, the survey would be conducted in June and July and results presented as part of the August 27th Budget Workshop.
Financial Implications: Partnering with the Stanford Crowdsourced Democracy Team to develop and facilitate a participatory budgeting survey will not have financial implications.
Environmental Considerations: This is not a project under CEQA, because it does not involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15378(b)(2) and 15378(b)(4) and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
Policy Implications: This initiative is consistent with City Strategic Plan Action Item 5.5 which directs the City to “engage the public in the annual budget process and utilize transparent, easyto-understand budget communication tools, including participatory budgeting, in ways that are practicable, accessible and inclusive.”
436
Title Description Cost min Cost max
Rainy Day Savings
Funds would be reserved by the City to address potential future downturn in City revenues to minimize impacts to core services. $0 $2,000,000 City Vehicle Fleet Electfification
Funds would be used to replace gas powered City fleet vehicles and to install EV charging stations. Funding within the sliding scale option would determine the scope of implementation possible within the funding amount. $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Ice Arena Sustainability Project
The project would include sustainability improvements to the Ice Arena beginning in 2026. Funding would be used to finance approximately $5.5 million in improvements that include replacement of the fire suppression system and chiller plant. $350,000
Traffic Calming
Funds would be used to implement neighborhood traffic calming measures in collaboration with residents. Traffic calming measures may include roadway features such as signage, road narrowing, pedestrian safety enhancements, stop signs, etc. Funding within the sliding scale option would determine the scope of implementation possible within the funding amount. $100,000 $500,000 Stateline Avenue Complete Street
Design
Complete streets projects enable safe access for all people who use streets, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders of all ages and abilities. Funds would be used to initiate community outreach, planning and design work to transform Stateline Avenue, Lakeshore Blvd and Park Avenue into complete streets with appropriate facilities for pedestrains, transit, bicycles and vehicles. Funds would augment $100,000 already allocated from the City General Fund. Advancing the project design would increase the competitiveness of the project for construction grant funding. $100,000 $400,000 Johnson Boulevard Complete
Street Design
Complete streets projects enable safe access for all people who use streets, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders of all ages and abilities. Funds would be used to initiate community outreach, planning and design work to transform Johnson Boulevard into a complete street with appropriate facilities for pedestrains, transit, bicycles and vehicles. Advancing the project design would increase the competitiveness of the project for construction grant funding. $200,000 $500,000
Bicycle Network connection
Funds would be used to secure easements, design construction plans and implement construction of Class 1 bicycle paths to complete a bicycle network connection at Sierra Blvd/Palmira Ave to the bikeway at Ponderosa St. $1,000,000 Spruce Avenue Safe Route to
School
This project would include sidewalks and improved pedestrian and bicyclist safety infrastructure in the area around Bijou Elementary School. $200,000 in funding would be used for community outreach, planning and design work to make the project "shovel ready" and increase its competitiveness for construction grant funding. Greater amounts of funding within the sliding scale option would be allocated to project construction, reducing the need to apply for grant funding. $200,000 $2,000,000
Pavement Rehabilitation
The City currently allocates a minimum of $2.5 million annually to road rehabilitation. Funding selected here would be in addition to the annual allocation and would increase the amount of pavement rehabilitation throughout the City in the next fiscal year. Funding within the sliding scale option would determine the scope of implementation possible within the funding amount. $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Participatory Budgeting Project List
437
Accessibility Upgrades
Funds would be used to continue implementation of the City's ADA Transition Plan. The Transition Plan identifies projects to remove barriers and facilitate equivalent access for all qualified individuals. Priority projects identified in the Transition Plan include removing path of travel barriers, repairing sidewalks and walkways, improving curb ramps, improving accessible parking spaces, improving ramps, installation of handrails, etc. Funding within the sliding scale option would determine the scope of implementation possible within the funding amount. $100,000 $250,000
Regan Beach Renovations
Funds would be used to update the conceptual plan and develop construction design plans for Regan Beach. Completions of design work will make the project "shovel ready" and increase its competitiveness for construction grant funding. $250,000 Connolley Beach Restroom Funds would be used to construct public restrooms at Conolley Beach. $1,000,000 General City Facility Upgrades
Funds would be used for on-going maintenance and rehabilitation of City facitities. This would include items such as HVAC system repairs/replacement, roof replacement, window replacement, exterior improvements, electrical upgrades, etc. $500,000
Lake Tahoe Boulevard Apartments
at 3900 Lake Tahoe Blvd
Affordable Housing
The Lake Tahoe Boulevard Apartments will be 100% affordable mixed-income residential project with an affordability term of 55 years and a ground floor commercial component consistent with the Tourist Core Area Plan mixed use goals. This project is anticipated to have 70 units of affordable housing, live work units, and common spaces. The site is vacant property on Lake Tahoe Blvd between the Midway Road and Pioneer Trail intersections. This site is unique in the Tahoe Basin based on its proximity to a variety of services, year-round employment opportunities and transportation options. Funds would be used to leverage state and federal funding opportunities to fully fund the $62 million project. $1,000,000 $2,000,000
Area Plan for Residential Areas
The project would involve development of an area plan that would serve as the land use and zoning policy and regulatory document covering all residential areas not already within the boundaries of an area plan. Area plans are a component of the Tahoe Regional Planning agency Regional Plan to allow local jurisdictions greater flexibility in implementing a community vision and to create greater consistency with state laws, including laws to facilitate housing development. $1,000,000 438
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:16
Agenda Item: Ordinance Designating Very High Fire Severity Zones (First Reading) Executive Summary: City Council will consider a proposed ordinance to update "very high fire severity zone" designations in the City based on the updated California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) State Responsibility Area (SRA) map. California law requires Cal Fire to develop maps identifying very high fire severity zones for potential wildland fires, and local governments are then required to by Government Code section 51179 to adopt an ordinance formally designating these zones in their jurisdiction. On February 7, 2024, the City received an updated map from Cal Fire amending very high fire severity zone designations in the City. Pursuant to Government Code section 51179, the City is required to designate these updated zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving such recommended fire designations. The vast majority of the City is included in a very high fire severity zone, and this designation triggers additional building and fire code requirements intended to promote fire safety.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion to hold first reading (by title only) of an Ordinance (Replacing Ordinance 2019-1131) Designating Very High Fire Severity Zones, and refer second reading and adoption to the May 21, 2024, meeting.
Responsible Staff Member: Kim George, Fire Marshal and Jim Drennan, Fire Chief Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Fire Safety Zone Ordinance.docx
02-Ordinance - Fire Zones.docx
03 - Fire Severity Map (Exh. A to Ordinance).docx
439
City Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Ordinance Designating Very High Fire Severity Zones (First Reading) Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Kim George, Fire Marshal
Background: California law requires the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (“CalFire”) to develop maps identifying Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones for potential wildland fires, and local governments are then required by California Government Code section 51179 to adopt an ordinance formally designating these zones in their jurisdiction. The vast majority of the land within City limits is included in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and this designation triggers additional building and fire code requirements intended to promote fire safety.
On September 3, 2019, City Council adopted Ordinance 2019-1131 which designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones within the City. The proposed Ordinance would update the City’s fire hazard severity zones in accordance with existing law.
Issue and Discussion: On February 7, 2024, the City received an updated version of Cal Fire’s Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area map from CalFire identifying Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Pursuant to Government Code section 51179, the City is required to designate, by ordinance, very high fire hazard severity zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving such recommended fire designations. To clarify, the revised map shows a few parcels which are designated as high and moderate zones. The vast majority of the City falls within the “Very High Fire Hazard” category.
As a result, City staff drafted a proposed ordinance (Attachment 1: proposed ordinance) to update the City’s Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone designations in accordance with CalFire’s updated map.
Adopting this ordinance is required by law and allows the Building Official and Fire Chief to enforce the wildland interface fire protection provisions of the Building and Fire Codes. The Fire Department, after review of the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map, concurs with CalFire’s assessment. CalFire’s map for South Lake Tahoe is attached to this report. (Attachment 2: Cal Fire’s Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area) Financial Implications: Adoption of this ordinance has no financial implications for the City at this time.
440
City Council Agenda Report May 7, 2024 2 of 2
Environmental Considerations: This is not a project under CEQA, because it does not involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15378(b)(2) and 15378(b)(4) and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
Policy Implications: Government Code Section 51179 states, “A local agency shall designate, by ordinance, very high fire hazard severity zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the director pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c) of Section 51178. 441
Ordinance 2024-XXX (uncodified) May 21, 2024 Page 1 of 3 Ordinance 2024-XXX (uncodified)
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 21, 2024
An Ordinance Designating Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones
FINDINGS
A. The Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area is a geographical area identified by the state as a Fire Hazard Severity Zone in accordance with California Public Resources Code Sections 4201 through 4204 and California Government Code sections 51175 through 51189, or other area designated by the enforcing agency to be at a significant risk from wildfires.
B. On September 3, 2019, City Council adopted Ordinance 2019-1131 which designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones within the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”).
C. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 4204, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (“CalFire”), through the State Fire Marshall, “shall periodically review [Fire Hazard Severity Zone. . .] designat[ions . . .] and, as necessary, shall revise zones[.]”
D. On February 7, 2024, CalFire issued an updated Cal Fire’s Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area map or El Dorado County. Most of the City falls into the Very High Severity category. The map has been provided to the City by CalFire for review. Adoption of CalFire’s updated Fire Hazard Ratings for the City allows the City’s Building Official and Fire Chief to enforce the WildlandUrban Interface requirements found in the California Fire and Building Codes for the updated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones designations in the City.
These Wildland-Urban Interface requirements increase fire safety requirements on items such as roofing, siding, attic, and foundation venting. These requirements affect new residential construction.
E. The Building Official shall enforce the provisions of Title 24 California Code of Regulations, California Building Code, Part 2, Chapter 7A, in all Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones designated by the Fire Chief.
F. The Fire Chief may designate areas not identified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones by CalFire following a finding supported by substantial evidence in the record that the requirements of the California Government Code section 51182 are necessary for effective fire protections within those areas. 442
Ordinance 2024-XXX (uncodified) May 21, 2024 Page 2 of 3 G. The Fire Chief, after review of the Cal Fire including its designation of Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones within the City, concurs with CalFire’s assessment.
Now, Therefore, the City Council of City of South Lake Tahoe does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Certain areas within the City are hereby designated as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, as indicated on the map attached as Exhibit “A” hereto.
SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is directed to certify this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty days after the date of its adoption.
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 21, 2024 by the following vote:
Yes:
No:
Abstain:
Absent:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
First Reading:
Published:
Effective:
443
Ordinance 2024-XXX (uncodified) May 21, 2024 Page 3 of 3 444
445
446
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:17
Agenda Item: Resolution Recognizing June as "Pride Month" in the City of South Lake Tahoe Executive Summary: On March 26, 2024, Mayor Bass requested (with Councilmember Robbins seconding) a Pride Month Resolution be brought forward recognizing June as Pride Month and including annual crosswalk maintenance.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution recognizing June as "Pride Month" within the City of South Lake Tahoe.
Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Reviewed and Approved By: Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report - June Pride Month.docx
02-Resolution Recognizing June as Pride Month in the City of South Lake Tahoe.docx 03-Sample Flag
447
Council Agenda Report- May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Resolution Recognizing June as “Pride Month” in the City of South Lake Tahoe Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk and Joseph Irvin, City Manager Background: On June 7, 2022, City Council issued their first “Pride Month” Proclamation. In 2023, a similar Proclamation was issued with the addition of an “Inclusive Progress Pride Flag” painted on a City crosswalk near Lakeview Commons. On March 26, 2024, Mayor Bass requested (with Councilmember Robbins seconding) a Pride Month Resolution be brought forward recognizing June as Pride Month continuously and including annual crosswalk maintenance.
Issue and Discussion: This item is being brought forward at the request of the Council. The Council may vote to pass, change, or not pass the Resolution.
Financial Implications: The annual cost for materials and labor to maintain the crosswalk has been estimated by the Director of Public Works at $6,500 and has already been accounted for the annual Operating Budget.
Environmental Considerations: This action is not a “project” requiring environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) (organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).
Policy Implications: The issuance of a Resolution recognizing the Month of June as “Pride Month” meets Strategic Priority 3.2 Inclusion and Diversity:
Goals:
Develop a greater sense of community and connection by investing in community services, resources, gathering areas, events and dialogue
Diversity is critical in that the greater sum of many voices to one shared goal gives each voice a stake in a positive outcome
448
Resolution 2024-XXX May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2024-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 7, 2024
Recognizing June as “Pride Month” in the City of South Lake Tahoe
BACKGROUND
A. In 2010 President Barack Obama declared June to be LGBT Pride Month, stating, ”I call upon all Americans to observe this month by fighting prejudice and discrimination in their own lives and everywhere it exists.”
B. This nation was founded on the principle that every individual has inherent dignity and worth, and the City Council calls upon the people of South Lake Tahoe to embrace this principle and work to eliminate prejudice everywhere it exists.
C. The City of South Lake Tahoe’s vibrant community comprises individuals, families, and allies identifying as LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, Plus others) who demonstrate pride in and commitment to our City throughout the year.
D. Celebrating Pride Month influences awareness and provides support and advocacy for the City of South Lake Tahoe’s LGBTQ+ community and is an opportunity to take action and engage in dialogue to strengthen alliances, build acceptance and advance equal rights.
E. On March 26, 2024, Mayor Bass requested (with Councilmember Robbins seconding) a Resolution officially recognizing June as “Pride Month” in the City of South Lake Tahoe.
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:
1. Recognizes June as Pride Month in the City of South Lake Tahoe in 2024 and thereafter and celebrates people who identify as LGBTQ+ and their contributions to South Lake Tahoe.
2. In observance of Pride Month, the City will maintain an Inclusive Progress Pride Flag (or similar) painted sidewalk to honor the history of the LGBTQ+ liberation movement and to support the rights of all citizens to experience equality and freedom from discrimination.
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 7, 2024, by the following vote:
Yes:
No:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
449
Resolution 2024-XXX May 7, 2024 Page 2 of 2
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
450
451
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:18
Agenda Item: Option for Elections Code Section 9212 Report for Vacancy Tax Citizens Initiative Executive Summary: On April 22, 2024, the City Clerk received the citizens initiative petition entitled “An Initiative Measure to Establish a Tax on Owners of Vacant Residential Units in the City of South Lake Tahoe†back from Locals for Affordable Housing, which has been transmitted to the El Dorado County Registrar of Voters, Elections Department, for signature examination and verification. While signature verification is ongoing, staff is requesting that City Council provide direction on whether to prepare a report under Elections Code section 9212, which must be presented back to City Council no later than 30 days after the City Clerk certifies to the City Council the sufficiency of the petition.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Either: (1) Pass a motion requesting an Elections Code section 9212 report for the Vacancy Tax Citizens Initiative to be presented at the June 18 City Council meeting to cover its fiscal impact, its effect on the use of land, availability of housing, and ability of the City to meet its regional housing needs, and its impact on funding for infrastructure including transportation infrastructure, contingent upon the City Clerk certifying the sufficiency of the petition; or (2) Pass a motion directing staff not to prepare such a report.
Responsible Staff Member: Heather Stroud, City Attorney, and Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Attachments:
01-Staff Report-Elections Code 9212 Report.docx
452
Council Agenda Report- May 7, 2024 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Title: Option for Elections Code Section 9212 Report for Vacancy Tax Citizens Initiative Petition
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Members: Heather Stroud, City Attorney (530) 542-6046 Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance (530) 542-7431
Background: On April 22, 2024, the City Clerk received the citizens initiative petition entitled “An Initiative Measure to Establish a Tax on Owners of Vacant Residential Units in the City of South Lake Tahoe” back from Locals for Affordable Housing with 2,471 signatures, which has been transmitted to the El Dorado County Registrar of Voters, Elections Department, for signature examination and verification. To qualify for the ballot, at least 1,159 signatures from South Lake Tahoe registered voters are required. While signature verification is ongoing, staff is requesting that City Council provide direction on whether to prepare a report under Elections Code section 9212, which must be presented back to City Council no later than 30 days after the City Clerk certifies to the City Council the sufficiency of the petition. That action is tentatively planned for the May 21 City Council meeting, so if a report were requested at that time, it would not provide enough time to prepare a report prior to June 18, the last available City Council meeting before that 30-day deadline.
Issue and Discussion: In its entirety, Elections Code section 9212 states:
(a) During the circulation of the petition, or before taking either action described in subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 9215, the legislative body may refer the proposed initiative measure to a city agency or agencies for a report on any or all of the following:
(1) Its fiscal impact.
(2) Its effect on the internal consistency of the city’s general and specific plans, including the housing element, the consistency between planning and zoning, and the limitations on city actions under Section 65008 of the Government Code and Chapters 4.2 (commencing with Section 65913) and 4.3 (commencing with Section 65915) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.
453
Council Agenda Report- May 7, 2024 Page 2 of 2
(3) Its effect on the use of land, the impact on the availability and location of housing, and the ability of the city to meet its regional housing needs.
(4) Its impact on funding for infrastructure of all types, including, but not limited to, transportation, schools, parks, and open space. The report may also discuss whether the measure would be likely to result in increased infrastructure costs or savings, including the costs of infrastructure maintenance, to current residents and businesses.
(5) Its impact on the community’s ability to attract and retain business and employment.
(6) Its impact on the uses of vacant parcels of land.
(7) Its impact on agricultural lands, open space, traffic congestion, existing business districts, and developed areas designated for revitalization. (8) Any other matters the legislative body requests to be in the report. (b) The report shall be presented to the legislative body within the time prescribed by the legislative body, but no later than 30 days after the elections official certifies to the legislative body the sufficiency of the petition.
The purpose of this report would be to provide the electorate “the opportunity to make an informed decision on a proposed initiative.” DeVita v. County of Napa, 9 Cal. 4th 763, 778 (1995) (citing the legislative history of AB 2202 (1997-1998)).
Staff recommends that if City Council desires a report, that: (1) its presentation at the June 18 City Council meeting be contingent upon the City Clerk certifying the sufficiency of the petition; and (2) the report cover the following topics related to the Vacancy Tax Citizens Initiative Petition: its fiscal impact; its effect on the use of land, the availability and location of housing, and the ability of the City to meet its regional housing needs; and its impact on funding for infrastructure including transportation infrastructure. City Council is asked to provide in its motion any other matters requested to be in the report.
Financial Implications: Staff intends to enter into a contract with HdL for assistance with the fiscal impact portions of this report for an amount not to exceed $10,000. The report would be primarily authored by staff both to limit its cost and because of the short timeframe to prepare it.
Environmental Considerations: This action is not a “project” requiring review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines 15378(b)(3) (the submittal of proposals to the vote of the people that does not involve a public agency sponsored initiative).
Policy Implications: The City Council has the option to order a report under the Elections Code to provide the electorate with more information about the proposed initiative. 454
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 7, 2024
Agenda Item #:19
Agenda Item: Agenda Planning Calendar
Executive Summary: The attached Agenda Planning Calendar outlines a preliminary schedule for future City Council meeting agenda items.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: A Councilmember may request that an item be placed on a future agenda. Upon the support of one (1) additional Council Member, direction shall begiven to the City Manager to calendar the item for a convenient future agenda, but no sooner than the second meeting after the request was made, and/or modify the Agenda Planning Calendar as desired.
Responsible Staff Member: Joe Irvin, City Manager and Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Attachments:
APC - 05 02 2024.pdf
455
2024 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 02 2024)
Agenda Item Agenda Section
May 21, 5:30 p.m. City Clerk Tentative - Citizen Initiative - Tax on Vacant Residential Units NB Proclamation - Boating Safety Awareness Month Procs
Proclamation - Child Abuse Prevention Month Procs
City Manager Grant Acceptance from Tahoe Fund Supporting Lake Link Electrification Consent Termination of Heavenly Parking Agmnt & Parking Management of Ski Run NB Dev Services Annual Development Rights Appraisal Report NB Finance Quarterly Budget and Financial Status Report as of March 2024 Consent Investment Portfolio Report report as of March 2024 Consent Fire Fire Cal Fire Severity Map Ordinance (Second Reading) Consent Parks Comercial use of the City's Boat Launch at El Doardo Beach NB Public Works Airport Restaurant Lease Agreement NB
City Engineer Designation Consent
June 4, 9 a.m. City Attorney Ordinance Amending City Code Ch. 4.150 for 3-cart transition (first reading) City Manager EV Charging Parking Ordinance (First Reading) NB EV Charging Vendor Services Consent
Department
456
2024 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 02 2024)
Award of On-Call Electrical/Structural Engineering Consent Website Redesign NB
Dev Services VHR TAU Requirements Discussion NB
Mid-Town Area Plan PSA Consent
HR Citywide Salary Schedule Consent
Public Works Award Annual Pavement Rehab Project Consent Airport Master Plan Presentation NB
Contract Amend w/ Black Eagle for Annual Pavement Rehab Insp Serv Consent Annual CSA No.3 Public Hearing PH
Award Lakeview/Harrison ADA Upgrade Consent
June 18, 5:30 p.m.City Attorney Ordinance Amending City Code Ch. 4.150 for 3-cart transition (second reading) *CC/STRSA
City Clerk Resolution Calling for Consolidated Election - Candidates & Measures Consent City Manager Cannabis Revenue Grant Program Award Recommendations UB EV Charging Parking Ordinance (Second Reading) Consent
Dev. Services TCAP/TVAP Updates NB
STR Delinquent Fees Report
457
2024 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 02 2024)
Finance Direct Charge of Mello-Roos Special Tax for CFD 1995-1 for FY 24-25 Consent Annual Special Tax for CFD 2001-1 Series 2015 Refunding Bonds for FY 2STRSA Consent Public Works Airport Signage NB
Award Lakeview and Ski Run Electrical Upgrades Consent
Award Stateline Complete Streets Planning & Design Consent Award Airport Pavement Rehab Contract Consent
Accept FAA Award for Pavement Rehab Consent
Contract Amendment with Javiation for CM Services Consent Annual SB 1 Gas Tax Measure Resolution Consent
Award Bellamy Parking Garage PARCS & PGS Consent
Aug 13, 9 a.m. City Mngr. Resolution Authorizing Transportation Development Act Claim Consent Real Estate and Economic Development Services PSA NB
Transit JPA Update
National Community Survey Results
Barton Community Health Needs and Harm Reduction Update Dev Services Quarterly Housing Report
458
2024 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 02 2024)
Mid-Town Policy Input/Stakeholder Meeting
Finance Financial Policies Update Consent
Public Works Award Pioneer Trail Phase II Project Consent 2024-25 CIP Recommendations NB
SS4A Grant Submittal Authorization Consent
Designation of the PWD as the City Engineer Consent
Award Upper Bijou Creek Drainage Project Consent
Award of Pioneer Safety HSIP Project Consent
Award High Priority Pipe Replacement Project Consent
TRPA and Rec Facilities JPA Funding for the Bijou Park Connector Award of Tahoe Valley Greenbelt Phase 2 Consent
Award James-Eloise Drainage Upgrade Consent
Award of PSA for Dennis Machida Greenway Consent
Aug 27, 9 a.m. *Budget Workshop
Public Works Award of Bellamy Parking Garage Phase 2 Consent Award of PD Roof Repair Consent
459
2024 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 02 2024)
Sept. 10, 9 a.m. Dev Services Review of Employee Housing Public and Business Outreach Campaign Annual Homelessness Report
Employee Housing Signage Ordinance
Finance Investment Policy update Consent
Sept. 24, 5:30 p.m City Clerk City Council Compensation Ordinance (First Reading) Dev Services Disparate Impact Analysis Findings about Local Preference Ordinance Finance Quarterly Budget and Financial Status Report as of June 2024 Consent Investment Portfolio Report as of June 2024 Consent
Oct. 22, 5:30 p.m. City Clerk City Council Compensation Ordinance (Second Reading) Conflict of Interest Code Update
Finance GAAN Limit Consent
Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budgeted Funds Re-appropriation Consent Nov. 5, 9 a.m. TID Annual Report NB
Nov. 19, 5:30 p.m. Annual ROPS approval STRSA Consent
STRSA
Dec. 10, 5:30 p.m. Quarterly Budget and Financial Status Report as of September 2024 Consent Investment Portfolio Report as of September 2024 Consent 460
2024 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 02 2024)
City Clerk Records Management Policy (Updated)
City Manager Comprehensive Energy Services Contract
Municipalization of Electric Utility - Feasability Analysis Dev Services REACH Code Adoption
One-Year Results of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (December 31, 2024) Res. Area Plan to Accommodate SB9 and Remove Tourist Accomodation City/CTC land exchange agreement
Radon Presentation by Jeff Minor
Building Code Appendix AW adoption-3D printed structures Discussion: Second Home Cap/Permit Options (9/2024)
Finance Disolution STJPPFA Consent
Parks & Rec
Public Works Hwy 50/89 Concrete/Pavement Option
Unscheduled/Pending
461