South Lake Tahoe City Council
April 21, 2026

City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Police Boat Safety and Enforcement Program Funding Acceptance and Program Participation State FY 26/27
Location: Police Department
Responsible Staff Member: Lt. Russell Liles, (530) 542-6120 Background: The City provides a Police Boating Safety and Enforcement Program each year for residents and visitors of our community. This program begins approximately two weeks prior to Memorial Day weekend and ends approximately two weeks after Labor Day weekend. The program is funded every year by a state boating safety grant combined with El Dorado County vessel property taxes. The program provides the city with funding to staff and operate the Police Department patrol boat on the waters of Lake Tahoe during this time.

Issue and Discussion: The Police Boating Safety Program is funded by two revenue sources. The first source is financial aid from California State Parks, Division of Boating and Waterways. The South Lake Tahoe Police Department applies for this aid annually. On November 4, 2025 Council granted authorization for staff to apply for financial aid through the California Division of Boating and Waterways.

South Lake Tahoe PD has been granted financial aid and staff is now requesting Council to accept and authorize participating in the program. The financial aid period is from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 and will be submitted to request a program cost reimbursement in an amount of up to $39,953 from California State Parks, Division of Boating and Waterways.

The second revenue source is from El Dorado County vessel property taxes. The amount of vessel property taxes allocated for the City’s Police Boating Safety and Enforcement Program for the 2026/2027 fiscal year is $59,508.00.

To receive this funding, California State Parks requires the City Council to authorize the Mayor, or the Police Chief, to sign the application for financial aid and the financial aid program agreement. They also authorize the Mayor, or the Police Chief, to sign each reimbursement claim on behalf of the city per the agreement.

Financial Implications: There will be no additional impact to the general fund. The program will be funded as described above in the amount up to $99,461.66. Expenditures for the program will be reimbursed quarterly. Effective July 1, 2026; budget in account # 237 02110 should be amended as follows:
255
Council Agenda Report – April 21, 2026
.3

Revenue: #33211 $39,953.66
#31120 $59,508.00
Expenditures: #41020 (Personnel) $69,461.66
#43025 (R & M) $20,000.00
#46120 (Tools/Parts) $10,000.00
Environmental Considerations: The proposed action is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) (creation of government funding mechanisms or government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment).

Policy Implications: The police boating safety program supports the City of South Lake Tahoe’s Strategic Plan “Priority 3 – Ensure Public Safety”.
256
Resolution 2026-XXXX April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026- XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 21, 2026
Accepting financial aid from the California State Boating and Enforcement Aid Program; authorizing the Mayor, or the Police Chief, to sign the program agreement and each reimbursement claim; authorizing acceptance of financial aid award from the California State Boating and Enforcement Aid Program in amount up to $39,953.66 and to participate in the program. Acceptance of El Dorado County vessel property taxes, confirmed and certified by the El Dorado County Auditor in the amount up to $59,508.00 for a total program amount up to $99,461.66; and authorizing budget of that amount in the current City’s budget account #237 02110 effective July 1, 2026.

BACKGROUND
A. The City of South Lake Tahoe Police Department operates a Police Boating Safety and Enforcement Program.

B. The City of South Lake Tahoe Police Department applied for financial assistance from the State Boating and Enforcement Aid Program, after authorization from Council on 11/4/25 for up to $39,953.66 which shall be used solely for the Boating Safety and Enforcement Program.

C. The City of South Lake Tahoe has been allocated 2026/27 El Dorado County Vessel Taxes in the amount up to $59,508.00 and will expend 100 percent of these funds on a Boating Safety program.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Approves the California State Parks, Division of Boating and Waterways, application for financial aid.

2. Authorizes the acceptance of financial aid and participation in the program from the California State Boating and Enforcement Aid Program for an amount up to $39,953.66 and of El Dorado County vessel taxes in amount up to $59,508.00 for a total program budget of $99,461.66.

3. Authorizes the Mayor, or the Chief of Police, to sign the Program Agreement, and each reimbursement claim filed pursuant to the financial aid agreement.

4. Authorizes up to the total program budget be added to the 2025/2026 budget and allocated into account #237 02110 effective July 1, 2026 as follows:

Revenue: #33211 $39,953.66
#31120 $59,508.00
Expenditures: #41020 (Personnel) $69,461.66
#43025 (R & M) $20,000.00
#46120 (Tools/Parts) $10,000.00
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on April 21, 2026 by the following vote: Yes:

No:

Absent:
257
Resolution 2026-XXXX April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Abstain:

Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:

Date:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
258

Boating Safety and Enforcement Financial Aid Program Agreement This agreement entered into this 1
ST day of July, 2026, by and between the CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, DIVISION OF BOATING AND WATERWAYS, hereinafter called “Department,” and the CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, hereinafter called “Agency”;

WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, The Baseline funding outlined in III A. of this agreement is an estimate and contingent upon the approval of the Governor’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Act, the Department intends to enter into an agreement with the Agency for the purpose of conducting boating safety and enforcement activities as specified in Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 6593.3; and WHEREAS, the Agency is equipped, staffed, and prepared to provide such services under the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement and in accordance with Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 6593 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 6593.6, the Department is required to enter into an annual agreement with each participating agency; and NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows:

I. Applicable Law
Agency shall observe and comply with all applicable federal, state, and county statutes, ordinances, regulations, directives, and laws, including, but not limited to, Harbors and Navigation Code Section 663.7 and Section 6593 et seq. of Title 14, California Code of Regulations. Agreement shall be deemed to be executed within the State of California and construed and governed by the laws of the State of California.

II. Description of Services
Agency shall conduct boating safety and enforcement activities in the jurisdiction of the Agency in consideration of the payments hereinafter set forth.

III. Payments
A. Maximum Amount. The amount the Department shall be obligated to pay for services rendered under this agreement shall not exceed $39,953.66 for the agreement term in full consideration of Agency’s performance of the services described in this agreement.

B. Rate of Payment. The Department shall reimburse Agency in accordance with the reimbursement procedures set forth in Title 14, California Code of Regulations Section 6593.9.
259

C. Submission of Claims. Agency shall submit claims for reimbursement to the Department contact person identified in paragraph V of this contract on a ___monthly OR _X_ quarterly basis. (Please check one)
D. Failure to Submit Claims. Claims for reimbursement shall be submitted within 60 days following the last day of the reporting period. Pursuant to Title 14, California Code of Regulations 6593.9 (i), the Department may reduce an Agency’s allocation by five percent if the Agency exceeds the sixty-day billing period and an additional five percent for every thirty-day period thereafter that the Agency is late in filing a claim.

IV. Records
Agency shall maintain records pursuant to Section 6593.10 of Title 14, California Code of Regulations.

V. Notice
Notice shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been served when it is deposited in the United States mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:

TO DEPARTMENT TO AGENCY
Mr. Zach Mundy City of South Lake Tahoe Police Dept.

Department of Parks and Recreation 1352 Johnson Blvd
Division of Boating and Waterways South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 715 P Street, 12th floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Either party may change the address to which subsequent notice and/or other communication can be sent by giving written notice designating a change of address to the other party.

VI. Term
This agreement shall be for the term beginning July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027.

VII. Prior Agreements
All prior agreements regarding this subject matter between Department and Agency are hereby terminated effective June 30 prior to the term beginning date of this agreement.

VIII. Amendment
No amendment or variation of the terms of this agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

IX. Termination
Agency may terminate this agreement without cause in writing at any time. The Department may terminate this agreement without cause upon a sixty (60) days written notice served upon the Agency.
260

X. Special Provisions
A. Agency hereby certifies that the obligations created by this agreement do not violate the provisions of Sections 1090 to 1096 of the Government Code.

B. This agreement shall have no force or effect until signed by the Department, Agency, and approved by the Department of General Services Legal Department, if required.

C. Agency shall continue with the responsibilities of this agreement during any dispute.

D. In the event of an allocation reduction for this program, an equal allotment will be decrease from every participant.

E. Failure by the Agency to comply with the terms of this agreement may jeopardize the Agency's ability to be awarded funding in future funding opportunities offered by the Department of Parks and Recreation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND

RECREATION, DIVISION OF BOATING AND

WATERWAYS
By:

California Department of Parks and Recreation,
Division of Boating and Waterways
Date:
“Department”

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
By:

Title: _______________________________
Date:
“Agency”
261
262
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:7
Agenda Item: Grant Application to California Division of Boating and Waterways for Boating Safety and Enforcement Equipment
Executive Summary: Key Police Marine Unit equipment needs upgrading, including replacing the ineffective loudspeaker with a Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) for clear, long-distance communication; replacing the outdated, unserviceable FLIR system with a modern thermal imaging unit for improved low-visibility operations; and upgrading the vessel’s navigation and chart plotting system for safer, more accurate patrol and response. If awarded funding through the Boating Safety and Enforcement Equipment Grant, these upgrades would come at no cost to the City. Staff will return to Council for acceptance if funding is received.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing Police Department staff to apply for grant funding through the Division of Boating and Waterway Boating Safety and Enforcement Equipment Grant in an amount up to $100,000 to purchase, replace and/or upgrade boating safety and law enforcement equipment.

Responsible Staff Member: Lieutenant Russell Liles
Reviewed and Approved By: Jeff Roberson, Chief of Police Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - Police Boating Safety and Enforcement Equipment Grant Application Authorization.docx
02-Resolution-Police Boating Safety and Enforcement Equipment Grant.docx 263
Council Agenda Report – April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Boating Safety and Enforcement Equipment Grant Application Authorization Location: Police Department
Responsible Staff Member: Lt. Russell Liles, (530) 542-6120 Background: The City provides a Police Boating Safety and Enforcement Program each year for residents and visitors of our community. The California Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) offers grant funding to local government agencies to purchase boating safety and equipment through the Boating Safety and Enforcement Equipment Grant Program (BSEE). Staff is looking to apply to the Equipment Grant to purchase, replace and/or upgrade boating safety and law enforcement equipment for an amount up to $100,000.

Issue and Discussion: South Lake Tahoe PD currently operates our one police boat on Lake Tahoe, typically between Memorial Day and Labor Day. Police boat operations are funded by a financial aid program through Division of Boating and Waterways and El Dorado County vessel taxes.

As part of the proposed grant application, we seek to acquire and upgrade key equipment to enhance Police Marine Unit capabilities, including replacing the current ineffective loudspeaker with a Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) to provide clear, amplified communication over extended distances for public safety and enforcement operations; replacing the existing Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR) system, which is no longer effective or serviceable, with a modern thermal imaging unit to improve visibility during nighttime and low-visibility conditions; and upgrading the vessel’s marine chart plotting and navigation system to ensure accurate positioning, current mapping, and safer, more efficient patrol and emergency response operations.

With authorization from Council, staff will apply to the Division of Boating and Waterway Boating Safety and Equipment Grant to receive funding to replace the police boat outboard motors. The grant application period is March 16, 2026 – April 30, 2026. If awarded funding through the grant, staff will return to Council for acceptance of the grant funding.

Financial Implications: None. This item is only a request for authorization to apply for the Equipment Grant. This is a 100% reimbursement grant for eligible purchases from Boating Safety & Enforcement Equipment Grant Program (BSEE).

Environmental Considerations: The proposed action is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) (creation of 264
Council Agenda Report – April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 2
government funding mechanisms or government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment).

Policy Implications: The police boating safety program supports the City of South Lake Tahoe’s Strategic Plan priority “3 Public Safety”.
265
Resolution 2026-XXXX April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026- XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 21, 2026
Authorizing the Police Department to apply for the Boating Safety and Enforcement Equipment Grant Program (BSEE) through the Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) for funding to purchase, replace and/or upgrade boating safety and law enforcement equipment for an amount up to $100,000

BACKGROUND
A. The City of South Lake Tahoe Police Department operates a Police Boating Safety and Enforcement Program.

B. The police boats loudspeaker is ineffective from long distance or adverse conditions. If awarded The Boating and Safety Grant, funding received would cover the cost of replacing the police boats loudspeaker with a Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) to provide clear effective, amplified communication over extended distances for public safety and enforcement operations.

C. The police boats Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR) system is no longer effective or serviceable. If awarded The Boating and Safety Grant, funding received would cover the cost of replacing the police boats FLIR with a modern thermal imaging unit to improve visibility during nighttime and low-visibility conditions.

D. The police boats marine chart plotting system is failing and no longer service supported. If awarded The Boating and Safety Grant, would cover the cost of upgrading the police boats plotting and navigation system to ensure accurate positioning, current mapping, and safer, more efficient patrol and emergency response operations.

E. If awarded the grant, staff will return to Council to accept the funding from the Division of Boating and Waterways.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Approves and Authorizes the Police Department’s application for grant funding through The Division of Boating and Waterways Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant for funding to replace, purchase, and/or upgrade boating safety and law enforcement equipment.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on April 21, 2026 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain
266
Resolution 2026-XXXX April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:

Date:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
267
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:8
Agenda Item: Amendment to Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for Construction Support Services for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project (Phase 2) Executive Summary: The Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, split into two phases, is a vital community and environmental improvement project. Phase 1 of the project is complete as of September 2025. Phase 2 construction began in 2025 and will be completed by the end of the 2026 construction season. The initial contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec), previously Cardno, to provide professional engineering services for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project (Attachment 05), was entered into on January 14, 2020. With Phase 2 construction continuing into the 2026 season, some additional construction services support will be required from Stantec as the engineer of record for the project. The anticipated not to exceed budget needed for Stantec to provide construction support through completion of the Phase 2 construction is $9,700.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute Amendment No.12 to the Professional Services Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for a not-to-exceed amount of $9,700 for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $796,300.

Responsible Staff Member: Brianna Greenlaw, Senior Civil Engineer Reviewed and Approved By: Mohammad Qureshi, Director of Public Works Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - Stantec PSA Amendment 12.docx
02 - Project Area Map.pdf
03 - Stantec PSA Amendment 12.doc
04 - Exhibit A to Amendment 12 - Scope of Services.pdf
05 - Cardno Contract C-007-2020.pdf
06 - Amendments 1-11.pdf
268
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Amendment No. 12 to Professional Services Agreement between Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project
Location: Tahoe Valley drainage watershed, inclusive to the “Greenbelt” area located behind The Crossing (Refer to Attachment 02 for the Project Location Map.)
Responsible Staff Member: Brianna Greenlaw, Senior Civil Engineer Background: The Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project is a vital community and environmental improvement project. Based on feedback from the public received during the Area Plan process, subsequent design meetings and public survey for the Greenbelt area, the project was developed to provide the benefits requested by the community and stakeholders, including drainage, water quality, public space, new naturalized play structures, and improved active transportation paths.

Due to the size and diversity of the overall project, the City split it into two phases to secure funding from a variety of eligible and applicable funding sources.

1. Phase 1 consisted of stormwater and water quality improvement work within the Bonanza neighborhood and downstream of James Avenue at 3rd Street to Tahoe Keys Blvd.

2. Phase 2 consists of the Central Greenbelt Area (behind the Crossings) spanning between Emerald Bay Road at B Street down to Highway 50 at 4th Street.

Phase 1 of the project is complete as of September 2025. Phase 2 construction began in 2025 and will be completed by the end of the 2026 construction season.

The initial contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec), previously Cardno, to provide professional engineering services for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project (Attachment 05), was entered into on January 14, 2020. For a variety of reasons such as building upon previous scope, adding time to the contract, or needing additional construction support services due to the phasing and implementation schedule of the project, eleven (11) amendments have been executed (Attachment 06).

Issue and Discussion: With Phase 2 construction continuing into the 2026 season, some additional construction services support will be required from Stantec as the engineer of record for the project. This includes addressing contractor requests for information (RFIs), material submittal reviews, contract plan clarifications, revisions, and support of approved change orders, permitting clarifications and regulatory agency coordination, and completing site visits as requested by the City. The anticipated not to exceed budget needed for Stantec to provide construction support through completion of the Phase 2 construction is $9,700. Attachment 04 includes Exhibit A – the scope of services for amendment number 12 to Stantec’s contract.

Financial Implications: Existing budget in the project account allows for this Amendment No. 12 (Attachment 03) for consultant services. As reflected in the Phase 1 Change Order Ratification approved by City Council on February 10, 2026, 8% ($532,699.40) of the approved and budgeted 10% project contingency ($668,852.00) was utilized for Phase 1 construction. This allows for a remainder of $136,152.60 of unused 269
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 2
contingency funds that can be utilized for ancillary expenses such as this consultant amendment, required construction related wildlife surveys, survey monument preservation, labor code compliance, and materials testing that will be required in the 2026 construction season to successfully complete the implementation of Phase 2. After all associated project expenses have been paid and Phase 2 is complete, remaining funding should be available for other projects.

Environmental Considerations: The Planning Commission adopted the CEQA, Mitigated Negative Declaration on May 9, 2019, SCH# 20190292152.

Policy Implications: Installing storm drain infrastructure and water quality improvements assist with advancing the City Council Strategic Priority, Protect the Natural Environment, by meeting the sediment and nutrient reductions mandated by the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program. Fulfilling mandated TMDL reduction goals will assist with maximizing residential housing allocations under TRPA Code section 50.5.2.E.2 (Distribution and Administration of Residential Allocations – TMDL Implementation). 270
Map Extent
South Y
Greenbelt - Phase 2
Tahoe Valley SWIP - Phase 1
City Boundary
Lake Tahoe
Path: \\gis\share\Projects\PublicWorks\Engineering\TahoeValleyGreenbelt\TahoeValleyGreenbelt.aprx | Project Area Map | Date Exported: 9/27/2022 0 400 700 1,000 1,000 2,000
Feet
Public Works Department - Engineering
Tahoe Valley Stormwater
Improvement Project Area Map
271
City of South Lake Tahoe
Amendment No. 12 to Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, Professional Services Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (C-007-2020) The Professional Services Agreement entered into on January 14, 2020, between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., previously Cardno, (“CONSULTANT”) is hereby amended as set forth below.

The Contract is hereby revised to add the following,

1. Scope of Services. In addition to the Scope of Services specified within the original Professional Services Agreement, dated January 14, 2020, and Amendment Nos. 1 to 11 with this Amendment No. 12 to the Agreement that adds the work described within Exhibit A, Scope of Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to the CONSULTANT, as defined within the original Agreement and as augmented by Amendment Nos. 1 to 11 is hereby increased with this Amendment No. 12 by the sum of $9,700.00 as described within Exhibit A, Scope of Services attached hereto. In no case shall CONSULTANT compensation for work completed under this Amendment exceed the amended amount of $786,600.00 plus the additional fee of $9,700.00 for an amended total fee of $796,300.00, without written authorization from the CITY. Payment by the CITY under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the CITY at the time of payment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 12 to Professional Services Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. to be executed on April 21, 2026.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CONSULTANT
By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor Stephen Peck, PE
Senior Consultant/Principal
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.

Date: ________________ Date: _________________________

Business License # 0080171
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ __________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney Susan Blankenship, City Clerk 272
273

AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Professional Services Agreement entered into on January 14, 2020 between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (formerly Cardno - “Consultant”) is amended to include additional scope of services as described below. The City authorized amendment to the base agreement includes construction engineering support services.

Pursuant to the project tasks identified in the professional services base agreement, between City and Consultant, the following selected tasks/scope of services is included with the project work.

Note all project tasks listed for clarity.

Task 1 Project Management, Meetings, and Public Outreach ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $1,200.00 Project Management task includes the internal Stantec team coordination and communication efforts required to perform the work along with monthly budgeting, invoicing, and project administration.

Task 2 Supplemental Site Surveying and Basemap Updates
 NO ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $0.00 Task 3 Permitting
 NO ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $0.00 Task 4 60% Design Documents
 NO ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $0.00 Task 5 90% Design Documents
 NO ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $0.00 Task 6 100% Design Documents
 NO ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $0.00 Task 7 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis
 NO ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $0.00 Task 8 Easement and Real Property Services
 NO ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $0.00 274
Task 9 Bid Assistance
 NO ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $0.00 Task 10 Construction Support (as directed)
ADDITIONAL WORK/SERVICES IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TASK: $8,500.00 Stantec will provide general construction engineering support assistance, as the project Engineer of Record for Design, to the City for the project construction. Construction engineering support associated with this task may include the following efforts, on an as-directed basis (T&M) within available budget allocations.
o Contractor RFI response assistance
o Contractor material submittal reviews
o Contract plan clarifications, revisions, support of approved change orders o Permitting clarifications and regulatory agency coordination o Site visits/observations of construction work to provide as-requested support to City RE/RI for engineering design related field questions and design plan interpretations o Record Drawings
Task 10 Deliverables:
> Written response assistance for Contractor RFIs and Material submittals > Contract Plan Revisions (as directed, electronic files) > Record Drawings (as directed, electronic files)
Task 10 Assumptions:
> City is responsible for all Resident Engineer/Resident Inspector and material testing duties (Stantec is not acting in an RE/RI role)
> City will provide contractor as-built/redline drawings and other RE/RI supporting construction records/information to Stantec for development of a project Record Drawing set of plans in AutoCAD (electronic files to be provided).
275
Effective through December 31, 2026 www.stantec.com
2026 Schedule of Fees for
Professional Services
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
for
City of South Lake Tahoe
Project Assistant $125
Project Coordinator 140
Senior Project Coordinator 155
Production Specialist 160
Technical Editor 175
CADD/Drafting/GIS Consultant 1 150
CADD/Drafting/GIS Consultant 2 175
Field Technician 125
Assistant Staff Consultant 110
Staff Consultant 1 120
Staff Consultant 2 130
Senior Staff Consultant 1 140
Senior Staff Consultant 2 150
Project Consultant 1 165
Project Consultant 2 180
Senior Project Consultant 1 195
Senior Project Consultant 2 210
Senior Consultant 1 230
Senior Consultant 2 250
Senior Consultant 3 275
Director 325
Consultant and Director positions include professional Scientist, Ecologist, Economist, Engineer, Hydrogeologist, Geologist, Planner, and other technical and non-technical staff positions. Consultant hours spent providing expert witness, deposition, or preparation for deposition will be charged at 1½ times regular billing rate. Multi-year Project Rates will be escalated annually on January 1 at a rate of 3% or CPI for Western Wage Earners, the higher of the two.

Expenses
Use of a personal vehicle will be at the current IRS allowable rate. Subconsultant fees and all other direct costs (ODC) will be billed at cost.

Payment
Stantec invoices will be submitted monthly. Payment is due on or before the thirtieth (30th) day following the date of the invoice. Invoices paid more than thirty (30) days after the invoice date are subject to a finance charge of one percent (1%) per month.

Conditions
Stantec specifies that our services are performed, within the limits prescribed by our clients, with the usual thoroughness and competence of the engineering consulting profession. No other warranty or representation, either expressed or implied, is included or intended in our proposals, contracts, or reports. 276
1 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the __14th_day of January 2020 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Cardno (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, “Scope of Services,” Work Tasks 1, 2, 4, 7a, and 8a of the attached budget, hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, “Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue until December 31, 2020.

3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant’s compensation, including travel exceed $329,815 without additional written authorization from City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

C-007-2020
277
2 5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City or Consultant immediately for cause or without cause upon thirty days (30) days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination, and City shall be entitled to all work performed to that date.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.

7. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City.

8. Consultant’s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access C-007-2020
278
3 to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’s assigned personnel. Any third-party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

10. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and, b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2)].

11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement.

Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise.

12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/her duties under this Agreement.

Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

C-007-2020
279
4 In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied.

14. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any subcontractor, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’s work under this Agreement.

15. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies. i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies.

The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, C-007-2020
280
5 agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on the standard Occurrence form. Claims-Made forms are not acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by or on behalf of Consultant.

If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.
iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing an AM Best’s rating of no less than A: VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured’s under Consultant’s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/or work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.

C-007-2020
281
6 v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’s insurance policies. The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Airport Rd.

South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Airport Road, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant: Stephen Peck
P.O. Box 1533
Zephyr Cove, NV 89448
Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant.

Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor.

Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

C-007-2020
282
7 17. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

18. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1094.5, and as provided by law.

19. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

20. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent contractors hired in accordance with Consultant’s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent contractor hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

21. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

22. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (a).
b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.

C-007-2020
283
8 c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’s drug-free policy statement; and ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

23. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

24. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12101, et.seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.

25. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

26. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

27. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

28. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

29. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

30. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.

31. Debarment and Suspension Certification
A. CONSULTANT’s signature affixed herein, shall constitute a certification under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that CONSULTANT has complied with Title 2 CFR, Part 180, “OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (non-procurement)”, which certifies that he/she or any person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, C-007-2020
284
285

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
C-007-2020
286

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City of South Lake Tahoe (“City”) agrees to retain the design engineering consulting firm, Cardno (“Consultant”) to perform the scope of engineering services as outlined below for the Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project (“Project”). The following Scope of Services describes various work tasks the City may authorize the Consultant to perform during the life of the agreement.

The Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project (Project) is an important environmental project in the City of South Lake Tahoe (City) that will provide a unique opportunity to incorporate both stormwater and recreational improvements in one comprehensive Project. The Project area is composed of commercial areas, residential areas, open space, and a State Highway. The open space is currently under-utilized for stormwater quality treatment and provides key opportunities for recreation benefits. Project area constraints consist primarily of property ownership, a limited existing collection and treatment system for stormwater runoff, and an unplanned and under-utilized recreation component.

Building upon the planning work previously completed by the City, the Project final engineering design will result in complete civil plans for the proposed project improvements. The Cardno team understands that the final design must be supported by sound science in the areas of hydrology, hydraulics, erosion control, recreation, botany, and stormwater quality pollutant load reductions to meet the City’s project goals.

The City has acquired Proposition 1 planning grant funding from the State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) for the delivery of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) bid documents for the Project. However, the amount of Prop 1 planning grant funding is insufficient to complete PS&E bid documents for the entire Project area. The City and Consultant have determined the available planning grant funding is enough to complete the 60% PS&E bid documents. Therefore, the City will authorize the Consultant upon execution of this base agreement, to begin tasks specific to completing the 60% level of PS&E documents.

Supplemental planning grant funding is being pursued by the City at this time. The California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC) has expressed a strong interest in funding the Project. A planning grant application was submitted to the CTC and is expected to be approved by the CTC Board in March 2020.

The upper Project area, Greenbelt area, and lower Project area are defined as the West Area, Central Area and North Area respectively and are further defined as follows:
• West Area is the Project area located above Emerald Bay Road; • Central Area is the Greenbelt Area located between Lake Tahoe Blvd and Emerald Bay Road; and • North Area is located between Tahoe Keys Blvd and Barton Avenue.

C-007-2020
287
As additional project planning funds are acquired, Public Works may authorize through amendment(s) to this base agreement, additional work tasks, including but not limited to 100% bid documents, providing property acquisition services, bid support, and construction engineering services. A single task or a bundle of work tasks authorized by the City may be negotiated individually to determine mutually acceptable compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin on unauthorized work tasks until an amendment specifically adds the work to the base agreement.

Base agreement work authorized with the execution of this base agreement is specific to performing work tasks required to complete the 60% level of PS&E documents. Below and on the following pages is Cardno’s proposed scope of work for the professional services to develop final civil plans and supporting technical documents for the Project.

Task 1 Project Management, Meetings, and Public Outreach Timely and consistent project management, public outreach and coordination are critical parts of any project in the Lake Tahoe Basin. The following are the sub-tasks for Project Management, Public Outreach and Coordination.

Subtask 1.A Project Management and Coordination
The Project Management and Coordination sub-task includes the internal Cardno team coordination and communication efforts required to perform the work along with monthly budgeting, invoicing, filing, sub-consultant coordination and invoicing and general project administration. To facilitate these tasks, Cardno will assign a project coordinator who is dedicated to the project from inception to completion.

This allows for an efficient work process that benefits both the City and Project design team.

The Cardno team will establish effective communication between the parties involved, including; City planning and engineering staff, utilities, the public, business owners; and funding, permitting and regulatory agencies. Our experience shows that although the primary point of contact will be the Project Manager, direct communications between City staff and designated Task Leaders should occur when needed for efficiency of certain project work efforts. All internal team communications will be led by the Project Manager who will coordinate closely with Task Leaders.

Subtask 1.B – Public Outreach/Property Owner Meeting
The Cardno team will support the City in public outreach efforts at a key juncture during project development, most likely in the form of a public meeting. The public meeting (1) will provide a venue for facilitated communications between City staff and business owners, residents, and other stakeholders.

The format of the public meeting will be based on the meeting purpose and intended audience.

Design Workshop, Inc. (DWI) will assist Cardno with the organization and presentation of design elements for the public meeting. Cardno anticipates the meeting will be in an open house format where participants can drop-in, read displays and other informative materials, and offer comments. Facilitators will be available to discuss issues and form discussion groups. This format will allow community members to learn about and discuss the proposed project in an informal environment. Depending on the goals and purpose of the meeting, Cardno may use additional techniques, including comment cards C-007-2020
288
and dot exercises. Cardno can replicate these activities in an online survey format to provide an opportunity for people who may not be able to attend the meeting to still participate.

Subtask 1.C – Funding and Regulatory Agency/TAC Meetings The City and the Cardno team, along with funding and permitting agencies, will hold meetings at key junctures during the project development process to ensure all parties are informed and all project design considerations and requirements are being met, and to provide general coordination. For the purposes of this scope Cardno is proposing to allocate time for up to two (2) funding, regulatory, and/or TAC meetings.

Each of the TAC meetings will be attended by the Cardno Project Manager and one key Task Leader, and a Project Assistant to take meeting minutes. Cardno will coordinate the TAC meetings with the TAC members, provide an agenda for the meetings and additionally develop a PowerPoint or other suitable presentation materials summarizing the meeting objectives and presenting items to be covered for discussion. After the meeting, the meeting minutes will be developed/formalized and distributed to all meeting attendees.

Subtask 1.D – City Planning Commission/City Council Meeting This project may require presentations to the City Council or City Planning Commission. The primary purpose of the meeting will be to provide a project update and respond to inquiries from the City.

Attendance at the meeting (1 City Council or 1 City Planning Commission as determined by the City) will occur at or following a key deliverable point within the project schedule (i.e., completion of 60 percent or 90 percent designs as determined by the City).

The Cardno team will provide input on the purpose, outline, and content for meeting presentations and provide graphics developed as part of other tasks to help communicate project elements. Cardno’s efforts will include developing a PowerPoint presentation for the selected City Council or City Planning Commission meeting. Cardno’s Project Manager and one key Task Leader will attend the meeting, either presenting or supporting the City project manager, as directed by the City.

Task 1 Deliverables:
> Public Notification (flyer) and presentation materials for one public meeting (1) > PowerPoint presentation, agendas and meeting minutes for each TAC meeting (2) > PowerPoint presentation for one City Council or Planning Commission meeting (1) Task 1 Assumptions:
> The overall duration of this contract is twelve (12) months > City will provide meeting venues
> City will provide postage for any mailings/flyers
> City will provide mailing list (and contact list) for all property owners, business owners and residents in the Project area that is current and updated
C-007-2020
289
Task 2 Supplemental Site Surveying and Basemap Updates
The previous project effort obtained preliminary survey information throughout the project area, including survey control establishment, aerial (LiDAR) data collection, and limited field surveying within the project area. Field survey consisted of the Greenbelt area and major downstream drainage features.

Although previous survey efforts were adequate for preliminary planning, preliminary design and environmental review, a detailed field survey is required to develop an accurate basemap for final project design and development of accurate construction documents. The Cardno team proposes to perform targeted survey data collection to obtain the necessary level of information.

Cardno has teamed with Morton & Pitalo, Inc. (M&P), to provide topographic land surveying for the Project. M&P is an experienced land surveying firm with extensive experience throughout the Sierra Nevada range. Site survey is required within the proposed Project improvement areas to define existing drainage courses and site topography, locate existing right-of-way features and roadways, tie-in existing utility facilities, locate predominate structures and landscape elements (buildings, fences, trees, rock outcrops, etc.), and provide accurate property information for design of the Project improvements.

The anticipated survey areas for the base mapping where design work will be performed, as described starting in Task 4, generally includes the following locations and/or project elements:

The following areas will be included a part of this contract • Greenbelt Area (to southeast of “Y”/US 50)
o Stormwater collection and conveyance; underground feature (B St, Barton Ave, 4th St) o Water quality detention basins, greenbelt meadow; surface feature (Greenbelt, 3rd St) o Bike/multi-use trails, and recreational site amenities; surface features (Greenbelt) o Lighting and landscape elements; surface features (Greenbelt) The following areas are included under a separate contract - [fall/winter of 2019] • Bonanza area (to west of US 50)
o Roadway features, cross sections, existing stormwater and public utilities (F Street, D Street, and Bonanza Ave)
o Water quality detention basins (3) sites on public parcels; land topo features and trees • Peripheral greenbelt area (to southeast of “Y”/US 50, between B St and Barton Ave) o Roadway features, cross sections, existing stormwater and public utilities (B Street, Barton Avenue, and 4th Street)
• 3rd Street Basins (between Barton Ave and Helen Ave)
o Roadway features, cross sections, existing stormwater and public utilities (3rd Street, Barton Avenue, and Helen Avenue)
o Water quality detention basins (2) sites on public parcels; land topo features and trees • James/Eloise and Stormwater Outfall (to north of US 50) o Roadway features, cross sections, existing stormwater and public utilities (3rd Street, James Avenue, Eloise Avenue, Council Rock Drive, and Tahoe Keys Boulevard) o Water quality detention basins (2) sites on public parcels; land topo features and trees C-007-2020
290
Subtask 2.A Survey Control
Previous efforts have established a baseline survey control across most of the Project area. While the survey control is project-wide, the control does not cover all of the areas requiring detailed survey, and the control has been in place for a few years. Therefore, verification and some resetting and placement of additional survey control will be required to accurately perform the topographic surveying of the project area and establish a more complete control network for civil design and future construction.

M&P will begin by confirming existing control and resetting any damage/destroyed control set previously. Additional survey control will be set based on coordination efforts with the design team.

Cardno will provide a drawing sheet within the plan set depicting the project control points and provide northing and easting locations in table format within the drawing for all relevant control points.

The additional/reset survey control will be set on the same datum and projection as the previous survey data (California State Plane, Zone 2).

Subtask 2.B Topographic and Planimetrics Survey
M&P will provide the necessary field surveying efforts for the project and collect the additional field information (e.g., topography, and planimetrics survey data) to develop an accurate updated base map for the project area.

The initial efforts associated with this task will be the review of the proposed project features and the existing survey data. Based on this review, the Cardno team will determine where, and to what extent, Cardno needs additional field survey data (planimetrics and topography) for proper design of the project. For selected areas of detailed topo mapping (e.g. Greenbelt/Central Area), Cardno will develop 1-foot contours and include 25-foot cross-sections of any adjacent pertinent roadways, where surface improvements are targeted. For segments of roadways and project areas where the main project element is predominately underground stormwater infrastructure, a limited yet appropriate level of topo survey data will be collected as the proposed improvements are less dependent on existing surface features. Where applicable, the planimetric survey will include survey shots of all found features (e.g., buildings, pavements, curbs, sidewalks, fences, walls, signs, utility poles, traffic signals, utility vaults and boxes, utility risers, underground utility manholes and inverts where accessible, stormwater facilities and drainage channels, trees, rock outcropping, and predominate landscape features) within the targeted survey/project area.

Subtask 2.C – Topographic Base Map
The Cardno team will compile the previously developed base map data with subsequent field survey data collected as part of this effort and develop a detailed project base map for the final design efforts.

The draft base map will be field checked by walking the project site, confirming all aspects are correct, and documenting any errors. The base map will then be updated, providing the Cardno team and the City with an accurate base map that can be trusted throughout the design process.

The process outlined above is an ideal approach to ensure the topographic and planimetric features are accurate. However, the boundary survey cannot be performed in such a manner. The boundary information collected during the field survey (Subtask 2B) will be used to develop boundary mapping in conjunction with subdivision and record maps available through El Dorado County and the Sierra Pacific C-007-2020
291
Power Company GIS parcel mapping. Unfortunately, older areas of Lake Tahoe, such as the project area, have inconsistent boundary information. M&P will collect available property record map information from the County Recorder’s Office that will be used to develop a more accurate parcel boundary layer for key properties adjacent to the project improvements. This parcel layer will be translated and rotated to the mapped field boundary points as a “best fit” determined by a licensed land surveyor, to create a design-level property boundary map. For easement acquisitions, additional survey and mapping may be required to rectify material discrepancies and conflicts identified between the record mapping and field data. This effort would be completed as part of an optional Property Acquisition Task, upon direction from the City, once final acquisition properties are identified.

The Cardno team will collect utility pothole location data, updated utility grid map information from respective utility companies, and add any relevant information to refine the updated project base mapping (defined/scoped under Task 4). Where applicable, utility grid information can be rectified to field survey points and modified where survey information is of better quality than the grid maps (USA and visible information [manholes, valves, etc.] field surveyed).

Subtask 2.D – Property Boundary Mapping
The available property boundary information used for the planning/preliminary design phase was approximate, including county database and GIS based property data, and though relative for the preliminary layout of project elements, it is not sufficient for the final design documents.

M&P will prepare property boundary mapping for the right of ways of the streets and parcels proposed for stormwater quality basins and the greenbelt improvements within the Project area; and incorporate the property information with the project base map. The basis of the property boundary mapping will be from record information, and not the result of a detailed corner/monument field survey. Record subdivision maps, assessor maps and other recorded information available through the City and County will be the source of data. The property boundary mapping will be best fit to fences, utility poles, common improvements and other predominate physical/land features as an overlay to the Topographic and Planimetrics Survey.

Task 2 Deliverables:
> Electronic files of control points in Autodesk Civil3D format (California State Plane Coordinate System Zone 2, NAD83 for horizontal, and NAVD88 for elevation) > Project Basemap in Autodesk Civil3D format
Task 2 Assumptions:
> Survey control will be established; however, protection from manmade or natural disturbances is not guaranteed. Future use of the control for construction will require verification, and potential reestablishment, prior to use for construction. > Accuracy of the “best fit” property boundary mapping is not certain, though expected to have a reasonable level of confidence within 3-feet or less horizontal offset.

Task 3 Permitting
The Cardno team will assist the City in developing the appropriate permit application submittal packages that will be required for project implementation. The applications will combine the resource analysis C-007-2020
292
that was conducted for the project-level initial study (IS)/mitigated negative declaration (MND)/initial environmental checklist (IEC) with the design information developed for project construction (e.g., 60 percent and 90 percent design plan sets). Cardno will follow a process that has been successfully used for similar public service and environmental improvement program (EIP) projects in the Tahoe Basin and is based on early and continuous communication and coordination between the design team and the agencies. The permits and key supporting documents that are anticipated, and scoped/budgeted for the project include:
• TRPA EIP Project Permit
• TRPA Soils/Hydro Report and Findings
• State Water Resources Control Board Section 401 Water Quality Certification • USACE Section 404 Authorization (pursued under the authority of a Nationwide Permit) • Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Notice of Intent for Coverage under the Tahoe General Construction Permit (Board Order No. R6T-2016-0010) • Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), in draft format complying with the Tahoe General Construction Permit
• Caltrans Hydrology Review/Coordination, and Encroachment Permit During the development of the 60 percent design plans, the Cardno team will coordinate with the appropriate agencies to obtain written documentation confirming the required permits and submittal timelines that will be necessary to meet the project construction schedule. The Cardno team is familiar with these permit application submittal requirements and will coordinate early and often with the regulatory agencies to ensure the project construction schedule will be met.

Permit applications and the project-level SWPPP (draft format) will be prepared during the 90 percent design step. Permit application submittal packages will include the project’s 90 percent design plan set.

Agency requests and permit conditions will then be incorporated into the 100 percent design.

Task 3 Deliverables:
> Application submittal packages for the permits identified in this task - TRPA EIP Project Permit Application
- State WRCB Section 401 Water Quality Certification
- USACE Section 404 Authorization
- Lahontan RWQCB NOI, and draft SWPPP document
- Caltrans Encroachment Permit
> Project-level SWPPP (1 draft and 1 working final)
Task 3 Assumptions:
> Findings from the previous Aquatic Resources Delineation Report (under separate contract) will be used to inform the project design and permitting efforts. > No Forest Service-managed land and/or USFS funding is assumed for the Project. > For California Tahoe Conservancy lands identified for use in association with the Project, required License Agreements are not included with this scope/budget (to be determined with optional Task 8, for easement and property acquisition assistance).

C-007-2020
293
> The Project is a public service project, improving area-wide stormwater infrastructure and implementing public recreation amenities that are suitable to the Greenbelt/Central Area land use and capability. Because of the nature of the project, the assumption is that USACE and Lahontan Water Board will not require compensatory mitigation as a condition of authorizations. > Task 3 assumes one submittal of CWA Section 404 and 401 permits applications that will be based on the 60% Design Plan (or subsequent design plan, at the discretion of the City), providing supplemental project information to USACE and Lahontan, as necessary. Our approach is to present a maximum-case impact estimation to waters of the U.S and to waters of the State. A subsequent change in the project design or location, which results in impacts that exceed this maximum-case impact estimation, may trigger additional permitting actions (e.g., reapplication or change from a Nationwide Permit authorization to a Letter of Permission) that are not included in Task 3. > If federal funding is obtained for any aspect/portion of the project from a funding source other than the USFS, additional NEPA, and potentially CEQA efforts would be required. The most likely funding scenario would be transportation funding through Caltrans from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). If federal funding is obtained, the Project would become “federalized” and additional environmental compliance, and other project aspects, will be required but are not included within the current Project scope/budget.

Task 4 60% Design Documents
Development of the 60 percent design detail is a critical step in the design development process, as the design evolves from a general/preliminary level to a detailed design level. The previously completed 30 percent design plans provide a preliminary design that will serve as the basis for the overall goals and function of the project improvements. In coordination with the City, Cardno will add detail to the plans and cost estimates to address key project challenges and provide necessary constructability information to show how the project is to be built and establish a clear budget for the construction costs.

The Cardno team will provide the City with key updates, and encourages informal communication with the City PM on a regular basis (standing phone calls). This collaboration will promote a cohesive design approach and provide our team with feedback on critical design elements, impacts, and potential construction constraints.

Preliminary Design Report
The Cardno team will assist the City and prepare a preliminary design report, in direct response to the State Water Board Prop 1 grant agreement requirement for the Project stormwater planning. The preliminary design report is to focus on implementation of the Project and include a summary of data collection completed in the planning phase to support the design effort as follows:
• Geotechnical study,
• Hydrology study, and hydraulics analysis,
• Land use study, and maps of public lands, and
• Other technical studies completed to support the project design The preliminary design report will be developed during the 60% design phase and conclude at this step in the project delivery process. The design report will not be updated with each design iteration.

C-007-2020
294
Design Development
The Cardno team will utilize updated survey and basemap (Task 2) data along with information obtained as part of the update and refinement of the project hydrologic/hydraulic analysis (Task 7) to guide the design process. The 60 percent design plans will be developed on the basis of the preferred alternative reflected in the 30 percent preliminary design, and address requirements resulting from the environmental review, including construction and/or mitigation measures. It is noted herein that the Third Street “treated water” pipeline as shown in the 30 percent plans, is assumed to be removed from the design going forward (and is not part of this scope) as a project element due to cost/benefit concerns as previously discussed with City staff.

The plans will represent an industry standard 60 percent design level and incorporate the Project elements desired for construction. The plan set will be comprised of the following types of plan sheets:
• Title sheet, notes and legend
• Index sheets, survey control and alignments
• Temporary controls for traffic, staging, storage and access, and BMP plans • Plan and profile civil sheets for stormwater system and bike trail/roadway surface improvements
• Greenbelt site amenity plan sheets
• Grading sheets and cross-sections for major earthwork components (detention basins, greenbelt)
• Landscape and irrigation plan sheets
• Lighting and electrical plans
• Typical details for project facilities (including city standard details where applicable) In order to streamline the design process, and to provide a reduced design development cost in the most efficient manner possible, while also providing design plans and construction documents that can effectively be constructed, the following types of sheets will not be included in the plan set:
• Roadway surface cross sections, for areas where little or no surface improvements are proposed, and primarily just include underground infrastructure • Isolated bike/multi-use trail cross sections (for efficiency, anticipated to develop combined cross sections for Greenbelt grading and bike trail surface improvements) Key design features for the 60 percent design plans are expected to include: project elements for stormwater collection, conveyance and treatment, including detention/basins and channels; bike and multi-use trail facilities; pedestrian lighting/electrical improvements; recreational site amenities within the greenbelt; and landscaping/revegetation improvements. The plans will contain sufficient underground utility information (from utility grid maps and potholing efforts) to ensure major utility conflicts can be avoided or mitigated.

Design Workshop (DWI) will provide landscape, irrigation, and site amenity plans in support of the 60 percent design. Cardno and DWI have worked together on numerous recreation and EIP projects; Cardno is confident in our ability to weave civil and landscape design together to create a project that meets dispersed goals of recreation, hydrology, and permitting requirements. The recreation opportunities within the greenbelt will provide enhanced trail connectivity, trail loops, and clear C-007-2020
295
wayfinding to promote bicycling and walking connections to commercial and residential areas. Seating overlooks and interpretive amenities are anticipated; they will create a learning landscape that serves users of all ages. Additional recreation opportunities exist within the Greenbelt/Central Area. Providing recreational improvements will expand public use of the community gathering area located at the Crossing retail center. Improvements are anticipated to provide children’s play amenities that are naturalized and respond to the natural environment. The recreational improvements will be selected to promote independent exploration and a connection to the outdoors. DWI will review and provide input on grading plans to coordinate the grading and storm water strategies with the overall aesthetic and landscape approach.

Western Botanical Services (WBS) will provide revegetation design for stormwater quality basins, source controls, and restoration of areas disturbed by construction or in need of erosion control stabilization.

PK Electrical will provide electrical engineering and site lighting design. The pedestrian lighting in the 60% plans will include locations of proposed pedestrian lighting (based on light type and illumination requirements), along with general details of the pedestrian lighting style.

Prior to TAC review, the Cardno team will provide the 60 percent design plans to the City for review and comment. The Cardno team will meet with the City to review the plans and conduct a review meeting at the project site. This meeting will enable the Cardno team and City to walk the site and review the proposed improvements against the existing conditions. This will allow both parties to identify any potential project issues/complications so it can be addressed at the 90 percent design step.

At this stage of the design process, the Cardno team does not propose to develop project technical specifications or special provisions. These will be developed at the 90 percent design stage when the project design is refined, and all material aspects of the project are nearly complete. This will reduce drafting efforts for general assumptions on the specifications/special provisions and reduce City review time, allowing for a more efficient project delivery process at a reduced cost.

Utility Mapping, Coordination and Potholing
Cardno will coordinate with utility companies to obtain any updated and available as-built and grid mapping utility data to supplement previous efforts from the preliminary design. Potholing plans will be developed for potential conflict locations based on the updated 60 percent design progress in order to verify utility locations, identify conflicts, and inform the design efforts. Pothole locations will be recorded and tied-in by field survey for accuracy; either at the time of potholing or marked in the field with paint or wooden stakes, depending on location and efficiency. Surveyed utilities will then be located in the plans and noted according to field notes for depth, material, and type.

A potholing plan and general potholing schedule (high priority, design priority and construction priority) will be developed and provided to the respective utility companies for review, coordination and discussion. The Cardno team will coordinate with the utilities (one utility coordination and review meeting, which will be conducted at a “DIGGS” meeting the City typically attends) to review the proposed potholing to be performed. A total of eight (8) utility potholes has been assumed and included in the scope (for electric, telephone, cable and/or natural gas). In addition to the eight utility potholes, it is assumed that any sewer and water utility pothole efforts can be coordinated and performed by South C-007-2020
296
Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD) crews, in a collaborative effort with City as cost savings measure for the Project.

Cost Estimate
To augment the plans, Cardno will produce a construction cost estimate to detail the anticipated project costs. The estimate will expand on the preliminary cost estimate for the project with refinements and updates based on the 60% design. Cardno will coordinate with the City and establish unit prices to reflect recent construction costs for similar work in the region. Recent bid results from other City projects will provide useful data points.

Task 4 Deliverables:
> 60% design plans (1 City draft and 1 TAC draft)
> 60% estimate of probable costs
> Potholing Plan
> Potholing of Utilities (8 potholes)
Task 4 Assumptions:
> No work will commence until all comments have been received on the previous 30% design > City and TAC draft reviews and comments is scoped for 1 round/iteration > The City will provide all meeting venues
> Sewer and water utility potholes performed by STPUD
Task 5 90% Design Documents
The Cardno team will prepare a 90 percent design package for the project. The 90 percent design will be developed based on comments received from the City and TAC at 60 percent design and include the same plan sheet types as documented in the 60% design (Task 4). The updated plans are to represent a standard 90 percent detailed design and clearly define the project for permitting purposes.

In addition to the plans, draft technical specifications for the project will also be developed for major materials/items associated with the project. At this design step, technical specifications will focus on major materials, facilities and construction methods; however, no technical specifications will be developed for minor/standard work items associated with the project at the 90 percent juncture.

Specifications for minor/standard/general construction elements and temporary controls (e.g. water pollution control, construction survey, schedules, traffic control, etc.) will be delayed until the 100 percent design step. Preparing the specifications when all aspects of the project are complete will reduce drafting efforts/time/costs for general assumptions on the specifications/special provisions and reduce City review time. This approach will be more efficient with the project delivery process and reduce cost. The project technical specifications will be developed in a format suitable for incorporation into a special provisions document (City template) referencing the Caltrans Standard Specifications.

Prior to TAC review, the Cardno team will provide the 90 percent design plans to the City for review and comment. The Cardno team will meet with the City to review the plans and conduct a final review meeting at the project site. This meeting will enable the Cardno team and City one last opportunity to ground-truth the design plans, consider any value engineering opportunities, and walk the site to confirm the proposed improvements are appropriate to meet the project goals.

C-007-2020
297
A draft SWPPP document developed under the permitting task and commencing at the 90 percent design, will be submitted to the permitting agencies at this stage along with project permit applications.

Task 5 Deliverables:
> 90 percent design plans (1 City draft and 1 TAC draft) > 90 percent technical specifications/special provisions for major construction elements (1 draft) > 90 percent cost estimate
Task 5 Assumptions:
> No work will commence until all comments have been received on the previous 60% design > City and TAC draft reviews and comments are scoped for 1 round/iteration > Minor/general/standard construction elements will not have technical specifications developed at the 90%; they will be developed at the 100% design step > The special provisions (technical specifications) will be developed following City boilerplate templates > The city is responsible for all contractual/front end special provision/technical specification sections Task 6 100% Design Documents
The Cardno team will prepare a 100% design package for the project. Cardno will finalize the 100% design based on comments received from the City and TAC on the 90% design along with permit comments and conditions received from regulatory agencies reviewing the permit applications. The 100% design will be a construction-ready set of documents, including complete plans, technical specifications/special provisions, bid list, and cost estimate.

Task 6 Deliverables:
> 100 percent design plans (1 City draft and 1 Final)
> 100 percent technical specifications/special provisions (1 draft) > 100 percent cost estimate
Task 6 Assumptions:
> No work will commence until all comments have been received on the previous 90% design, and all permit conditions have been received
> City draft review and comment is scoped for 1 round/iteration > No Caltrans Documentation, LAPM forms, NEPA, etc. has been scoped/budgeted, as there is no current federal funding for the project
> The city is responsible for all contractual/front end special provision/technical specification sections Task 7 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis
Previous efforts associated with the project planning and preliminary design included development of an XPSWMM model of the project area—both the existing and proposed conditions. Cardno will use this model moving forward in the final design of the Project to assess both the hydrologic and hydraulic aspects of the proposed improvements. Existing storm drainage features in the model will be updated, refined and verified during the field surveying efforts associated with Task 2 to assure relevant existing C-007-2020
298
storm drainage infrastructure in the project area is surveyed and accurately incorporated into the modelling efforts.

Cardno will update the existing XPSWMM model at each subsequent phase of design (60%, 90% and 100% design steps) to reflect the design depicted on the project plans. Cardno will then run the model and analyze specific storm events as determined in coordination with the City, at minimum:
• The 25-year, 1-hour (to reflect the TRPA design storm) • The 10-year, 24-hour (as required by El Dorado County Drainage Manual) • One other storm event (potentially a 5-year, or 100-year peak flow if required by permitting agencies) as determined by the City at project initiation The XPSWMM model output will provide information on both the hydrologic and hydraulic conditions of each model event based on design parameters input (reflective of the project plans at each design step).

The Cardno team sees the modeling efforts as an iterative process during the design. When the stormwater infrastructure is designed in draft form (plan and profiles are completed), the data will be input/updated in the XPSWMM model. The model will then be run at the various design storms and reviewed. The review will include both surface hydrology/runoff and pipe network conditions. The XPSWMM model output and visual interaction aspects provide for real time information (i.e., if a pipe is surcharging and cannot handle the flows of a design storm, the pipe overflows and provides a visualization of this condition). The designers can then make adjustments in the model (increased pipe sizes, modifying slopes, etc.) to determine the most effective way to resolve the issue. Once resolved, the update will be incorporated into the design plans. This process will provide the City with design plans that adequately address the hydrologic and hydraulic aspects of the project area.

Once the final design has been completed (100% design), accepted by the Project TAC, and the XPSWMM model shows the hydrology and hydraulics operate acceptably in the proposed condition, the design information will be incorporated into a pollutant load reduction model (PLRM) for determination/estimation of annual fine sediment, phosphorous, and nitrogen removal rates.

Task 7 Deliverables:
> XPSWMM model – 60/90/100 design step updates
> Final Hydro/Hydraulic Memo – summary of model parameters and outputs, based on final design > PLRM model – based on final project design, for incorporation into city model templates for regulatory pollutant load reduction credits
Task 7 Assumptions:
> LiDAR data and existing storm drainage system survey data will be used in the development of the sub-watershed boundaries
> The City will provide baseline and any planning level PLRM model data available for the project area > The PLRM model will not be used or considered a design model and only developed after the final design has been completed and accepted by the City.

C-007-2020
299
Task 8 Easement and Real Property Services (as directed) Cardno and Interwest Consulting Group will provide preliminary acquisition support services, as directed by the City Project Manager, including the following real property services as necessary:
• Coordinate and attend a targeted meeting with the City to discuss easement and real property service needs for the project.
• Perform field/site inspections on the project area with property owners. • Review proposed right of way design, applicable environmental document and general project impacts.
• Assist in identifying the project right of way needs. • Draft property owner interest letter(s).
• Contact and coordinate meetings with the impacted property owners and inform them of project in general.
• Document property owner interest in project and feedback – i.e. Owner Survey. • Provide value engineering as review of right of way design mapping. • Provide progress reports regarding the status of property owner and/or tenant contacts. • Prepare a high-level right of way acquisition cost estimate for each subject property being evaluated.
o Determine each subject parcel’s state of development and probable improvements at the time of acquisition.
o Determine the market data sets required to estimate value. o Conduct Market Data Research utilizing data sources from internal resources, assessor’s information, multiple listing service, observed listings and information from brokers.

The City may authorize Easement and Real Property Services beyond the pre-acquisition work, through an amendment to the PSA.

Task 9 Bid Assistance
Optional task identified in the RFP, not included in the scope of work at this time. The City may authorize Bid Assistance through an amendment to the PSA.

Task 10 Construction Engineering
Optional task identified in the RFP, not included in the scope of work at this time. The City may authorize Construction Engineering services through amendment to the PSA.

C-007-2020
300

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
Schedule of Fees – 2020
Fee Proposal for
----- 60% Plans
----- Master Fee Schedule
and
----- Project Schedule
C-007-2020
301
Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and
Stormwater Improvement Project(Final Engineering Design) Dukes, Jason Sr. Consultant I
McRae, Brian
Sr. Consultant I
Manha, Andrea
Sr. Proj. Consultant I
Greene, Melanie
Sr. Proj. Consultant I
Trujillo, Ivan
Proj. Consultant I
Hochrein, Michelle
Sr. Staff Consultant II
Wong, Brandon
Sr. Staff Consultant I
Thomas, William
CADD/GIS Consultant I
Franco, Christopher
Asst. Staff Consultant
Sterling, Holly A.

Proj. Assistant
Browning, Lori A.

Sr. Proj. Coordinator
TBA
Technical Editor
M&P (sub)
Survey Manager
M&P (sub)
Engineer / Surveyor
M&P (sub)
2-Person Survey Crew
WBS (sub)
Etra, Julie
DWI (sub)
Principal
DWI (sub)
Assoc. PM
DWI (sub)
Proj Designer
PK Elec (sub)
Principal
PK Elec (sub)
Sr. Proj Engineer
PK Elec (sub)
Production
Project Task/Budget1. Project Management, Meetings, and Public Outreach 1a. Project Management and Coordination (12 Months) 36 12 36 8 22 20 $ 13,620 $ - $ - $ 5,650 $ 3,700 $ 22,970 1b. Public Outreach/Property Owner Meeting (1) 8 8 2 6 12 12 $ 2,730 $ - $ - $ 4,770 $ - $ 7,500 1c. Funding, Regulatory Agency/TAC Meetings (2) 12 16 4 $ 4,640 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,640 1d. City Planning Commission / City Council Meeting (1) 8 2 $ 1,810 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,810 SubTotal - Phase 1 64 12 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 8 36 0 0 0 0 0 14 34 12 0 20 0 $ 22,800 $ - $ - $ 10,420 $ 3,700 $ - $ - $ 36,920

2. Supplemental Site Surveying and Basemap Updates 2a. Survey Control 2 2 4 $ 410 $ 1,510 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,920 2b. Topographic and Planimetrics Survey 2 4 27 $ 410 $ 8,245 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,655 2c. Topographic Base Map 2 4 8 2 24 $ 1,890 $ 3,290 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,180 2d. Property Boundary Mapping 2 2 2 20 40 $ 920 $ 8,900 $ - $ - $ - $ 9,820 SubTotal - Phase 2 8 0 0 0 6 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 28 64 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 3,630 $ 21,945 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,575

4. 60% Design Documents 4a. 60% Plans 60 120 200 280 200 200 2 40 20 48 90 4 36 12 $ 134,270 $ - $ 5,400 $ 22,800 $ 9,060 $ 171,530 4b. Preliminary Design Report 4 2 8 4 8 40 2 4 $ 9,740 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,740 4c. 60% Cost Estimate 2 2 8 16 2 6 4 4 $ 3,780 $ - $ - $ 1,940 $ 740 $ 6,460 4d. Utility Coordination & Base Map Updates 2 8 24 $ 4,290 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,290 4e. Utility Potholing Services & Point Survey (8 potholes) 2 8 16 $ 3,370 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,000 $ 27,370 SubTotal - Phase 4 70 124 8 4 232 0 376 200 200 4 0 4 0 0 0 40 22 54 94 4 40 12 $ 155,450 $ - $ 5,400 $ 24,740 $ 9,800 $ - $ 24,000 $ 219,390

7. Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis 7a. 60% Design Updates 2 32 80 $ 15,050 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,050 SubTotal - Phase 7 2 0 32 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 15,050 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,050

8. Easement and Real Property Services 8a. (As Directed) Preliminary Acquisition Support Services 16 40 $ 7,880 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 32,880 SubTotal - Phase 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 7,880 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ 32,880 Total Hours 160 136 40 4 238 0 530 200 200 12 36 4 28 64 31 40 36 88 106 4 60 12 1560 123 40 230 76TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 204,810 $ 21,945 $ 5,400 $ 35,160 $ 13,500 $ 25,000 $ 24,000 $ 329,815 COMPENSATION TABLE
EXHIBIT  B ‐ 60% Design Fee Schedule
Staff / Rates
Cardno Labor (sub-total)
Subconsultant (sub-total)
Morton & Pitalo, Inc
Subconsultant (sub-total)
Western Botanical Services
Subconsultant (sub-total)
Design Workshop, Inc.

Subconsultant (sub-total)
PK Electrical
Subconsultant (sub-total)
Interwest Consulting Group
Utility Potholing
(Cardno / Sub-contractor)
TOTALS
C-007-2020
302
Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and
Stormwater Improvement Project(Final Engineering Design) Dukes, Jason Sr. Consultant I
McRae, Brian
Sr. Consultant I
Manha, Andrea
Sr. Proj. Consultant I
Greene, Melanie
Sr. Proj. Consultant I
Trujillo, Ivan
Proj. Consultant I
Hochrein, Michelle
Sr. Staff Consultant II
Wong, Brandon
Sr. Staff Consultant I
Thomas, William
CADD/GIS Consultant I
Franco, Christopher
Asst. Staff Consultant
Sterling, Holly A.

Proj. Assistant
Browning, Lori A.

Sr. Proj. Coordinator
TBA
Technical Editor
M&P (sub)
Survey Manager
M&P (sub)
Engineer / Surveyor
M&P (sub)
2-Person Survey Crew
WBS (sub)
Etra, Julie
DWI (sub)
Principal
DWI (sub)
Assoc. PM
DWI (sub)
Proj Designer
PK Elec (sub)
Principal
PK Elec (sub)
Sr. Proj Engineer
PK Elec (sub)
Production
Project Task/Budget1. Project Management, Meetings, and Public Outreach 1a. Project Management and Coordination (12 Months) 36 12 36 8 22 20 $ 13,620 $ - $ - $ 5,650 $ 3,700 $ 22,970 1b. Public Outreach/Property Owner Meeting (1) 8 8 2 6 12 12 $ 2,730 $ - $ - $ 4,770 $ - $ 7,500 1c. Funding, Regulatory Agency/TAC Meetings (2) 12 16 4 $ 4,640 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,640 1d. City Planning Commission / City Council Meeting (1) 8 2 $ 1,810 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,810 SubTotal - Phase 1 64 12 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 8 36 0 0 0 0 0 14 34 12 0 20 0 $ 22,800 $ - $ - $ 10,420 $ 3,700 $ - $ - $ 36,920

2. Supplemental Site Surveying and Basemap Updates 2a. Survey Control 2 2 4 $ 410 $ 1,510 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,920 2b. Topographic and Planimetrics Survey 2 4 27 $ 410 $ 8,245 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,655 2c. Topographic Base Map 2 4 8 2 24 $ 1,890 $ 3,290 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,180 2d. Property Boundary Mapping 2 2 2 20 40 $ 920 $ 8,900 $ - $ - $ - $ 9,820 SubTotal - Phase 2 8 0 0 0 6 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 28 64 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 3,630 $ 21,945 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,575

3. Permitting and SWPPP Document 3a. TRPA EIP Project Permit Application 2 48 $ 2,090 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,090 3b. TRPA Soils/hydro Report 2 242 $ 1,440 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,440 3c. State WRCB Section 401 Water Quality Certification 2 4 24 4 32 2 1 2 $ 10,295 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,295 3d. USACE Section 404 Authorization 2 16 24 2 1 2 $ 6,695 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,695 3e. Caltrans Hydrology Coordination, and Encroachment Permit 8 8 24 4 24 2 2 $ 11,760 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,760 3f. Lahontan RWQCB NOI, and Draft SWPPP Document 4 4 8 40 8 2 8 $ 10,090 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,090 SubTotal - Phase 3 20 12 28 58 28 108 0 16 0 6 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 42,370 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 42,370

4. 60% Design Documents 4a. 60% Plans 60 120 200 280 200 200 2 40 20 48 90 4 36 12 $ 134,270 $ - $ 5,400 $ 22,800 $ 9,060 $ 171,530 4b. Preliminary Design Report 4 2 8 4 8 40 2 4 $ 9,740 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,740 4c. 60% Cost Estimate 2 2 8 16 2 6 4 4 $ 3,780 $ - $ - $ 1,940 $ 740 $ 6,460 4d. Utility Coordination & Base Map Updates 2 8 24 $ 4,290 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,290 4e. Utility Potholing Services & Point Survey (8 potholes) 2 8 16 $ 3,370 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,000 $ 27,370 SubTotal - Phase 4 70 124 8 4 232 0 376 200 200 4 0 4 0 0 0 40 22 54 94 4 40 12 $ 155,450 $ - $ 5,400 $ 24,740 $ 9,800 $ - $ 24,000 $ 219,390

5. 90% Design (PS&E) Documents 5a. 90% Plans 40 80 120 200 120 120 2 16 10 40 92 6 36 16 $ 86,770 $ - $ 2,160 $ 19,370 $ 10,010 $ 118,310 5b. 90% Specifications 24 8 40 80 2 8 16 2 14 6 8 $ 22,690 $ - $ 2,160 $ 3,560 $ 1,480 $ 29,890 5c. 90% Cost Estimate 22 4 8 1 4 6 4 $ 2,300 $ - $ - $ 1,585 $ 740 $ 4,625 SubTotal - Phase 5 66 90 0 0 164 0 288 120 120 4 0 8 0 0 0 32 13 58 104 6 48 16 $ 111,760 $ - $ 4,320 $ 24,515 $ 12,230 $ - $ - $ 152,825

6. 100% Design (PS&E) Documents 6a. 100% Plans 20 40 80 120 80 80 2 8 8 26 46 4 16 8 $ 52,270 $ - $ 1,080 $ 11,410 $ 4,860 $ 69,620 6b. 100% Specifications 16 8 16 40 2 8 8 2 8 2 8 $ 13,090 $ - $ 1,080 $ 2,070 $ 1,480 $ 17,720 6c. 100% Cost Estimate 22 4 8 2 4 2 2 $ 2,300 $ - $ - $ 1,370 $ 370 $ 4,040 SubTotal - Phase 6 38 50 0 0 100 0 168 80 80 4 0 8 0 0 0 16 12 38 50 4 26 8 $ 67,660 $ - $ 2,160 $ 14,850 $ 6,710 $ - $ - $ 91,380

7. Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis 7a. 60% Design Updates 2 32 80 $ 15,050 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,050 7b. 90% Design Updates 2 24 60 $ 11,390 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,390 7c. 100% Design Updates 2 16 24 $ 5,890 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,890 7d. Final Hydro/Hydraulic Memo 2 8 20 2 4 $ 4,820 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,820 7e. PLRM Model 2 16 60 2 $ 10,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,200 SubTotal - Phase 7 10 0 96 0 0 0 244 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 47,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 47,350

8. Easement and Real Property Services 8a. (As Directed) Preliminary Acquisition Support Services 16 40 $ 7,880 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 32,880 SubTotal - Phase 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 7,880 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ 32,880

9. Bid Assistance N/A, optional service $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SubTotal - Phase 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

10. Construction Engineering N/A, optional service $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SubTotal - Phase 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Hours 292 288 132 62 530 108 1,150 416 400 30 36 36 28 64 31 88 61 184 260 14 134 36 3480 123 88 505 184TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 458,900 $ 21,945 $ 11,880 $ 74,525 $ 32,440 $ 25,000 $ 24,000 $ 648,690 EXHIBIT  B ‐ Master Agreement Fee Schedule
COMPENSATION TABLE
Cardno Labor (sub-total)
Utility Potholing
(Cardno / Sub-contractor)
TOTALS
Subconsultant (sub-total)
Morton & Pitalo, Inc
Subconsultant (sub-total)
Western Botanical Services
Subconsultant (sub-total)
Design Workshop, Inc.

Subconsultant (sub-total)
PK Electrical
Subconsultant (sub-total)
Interwest Consulting Group
Staff / Rates
C-007-2020
303
ID Task
Mode
Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 City Council Meeting (Agenda Item) 1 day Tue 1/14/20 Tue 1/14/20 2 Contracting / Notice to Proceed 3 days Wed 1/15/20 Fri 1/17/20 13 1.  Project Management, Meetings, and Public Outreach 248 days Mon 1/20/20 Wed 12/30/204 Project Management and Coordination 248 days Mon 1/20/20 Wed 12/30/20 25 Public Outreach/Property Owner Meeting 1 day Mon 6/22/20 Mon 6/22/20 24,66 Funding, Regulatory Agency/TAC Meetings (1) 1 day Mon 6/1/20 Mon 6/1/20 32SS7 Funding, Regulatory Agency/TAC Meetings (2) 1 day Mon 9/7/20 Mon 9/7/20 39SS8 City Planning Commission / City Council Meeting 1 day Tue 10/13/20 Tue 10/13/20 349 2.  Supplemental Site Surveying and Basemap Updates 15 days Mon 3/16/20 Fri 4/3/20 10 Topographic and Planimetrics Survey 5 days Mon 3/16/20 Fri 3/20/2011 Topographic Base Map 10 days Mon 3/23/20 Fri 4/3/20 1012 Property Boundary Mapping 10 days Mon 3/23/20 Fri 4/3/20 1013 3.  Permitting and SWPPP Document 130 days Mon 6/22/20 Fri 12/18/2014 Develop Draft Permit Applications and Supporting Documents 10 days Mon 9/28/20 Fri 10/9/2015 TRPA EIP Project Permit Application 10 days Mon 9/28/20 Fri 10/9/20 3416 State WRCB Section 401 Water Quality Certification 10 days Mon 9/28/20 Fri 10/9/20 3417 Draft SWPPP Document 10 days Mon 9/28/20 Fri 10/9/20 3418 USACE Section 404 Authorization 10 days Mon 9/28/20 Fri 10/9/20 3419 City Review of Draft Documents 10 days Mon 10/12/20 Fri 10/23/20 1420 Update Draft Documents ‐ Submit Agency Applications 5 days Mon 10/26/20 Fri 10/30/20 1921 Agency Review Period 30 days Mon 11/2/20 Fri 12/11/20 2022 Incorporate Permit Conditions, and Final Permit Submittals 5 days Mon 12/14/20 Fri 12/18/20 2123 Caltrans Hydrology Coordination, and Encroachment Permit 90 days Mon 6/22/20 Fri 10/23/20 2424 4.  60%  Design Documents 100 days Mon 2/3/20 Fri 6/19/2025 Develop Draft 60% Design Documents  60 days Mon 2/3/20 Fri 4/24/2026 60% Plans and Cost Estimate 12 wks Mon 2/3/20 Fri 4/24/2027 Utility Coordination, Potholing, and Basemap Updates 10 days Mon 3/16/20 Fri 3/27/20 26SS+30 days28 Preliminary Design Report (draft) 10 days Mon 4/13/20 Fri 4/24/20 26FF29 City Review of Draft Documents 10 days Mon 4/27/20 Fri 5/8/20 2530 Incorporate City Comments, and Submit 60% Plans to TAC 10 days Mon 5/11/20 Fri 5/22/20 2931 TAC  Review Period, 60% Design 10 days Mon 5/25/20 Fri 6/5/20 3032 TAC Review Meeting, 60% Design 1 day Mon 6/1/20 Mon 6/1/20 30FS+5 days33 Final 60% Design Documents, and Prelim Design Report 10 days Mon 6/8/20 Fri 6/19/20 3134 5.  90% Design (PS&E) Documents 70 days Mon 6/22/20 Fri 9/25/2035 Develop Draft 90% Design (PS&E) Documents  6 wks Mon 6/22/20 Fri 7/31/20 2436 City Review of Draft Documents 10 days Mon 8/3/20 Fri 8/14/20 3537 Incorporate City Comments, and Submit 90% Plans to TAC 10 days Mon 8/17/20 Fri 8/28/20 3638 TAC  Review Period, 90% Design 10 days Mon 8/31/20 Fri 9/11/20 3739 TAC Review Meeting, 90% Design 1 day Mon 9/7/20 Mon 9/7/20 37FS+5 days40 Final 90% Design Documents 10 days Mon 9/14/20 Fri 9/25/20 3841 6.  100% Design (PS&E) Documents 40 days Mon 9/28/20 Fri 11/20/2042 Develop Draft 100% Design (PS&E) Documents  4 wks Mon 9/28/20 Fri 10/23/20 3443 City Review of Draft Documents 10 days Mon 10/26/20 Fri 11/6/20 4244 Final 100% Design Documents 10 days Mon 11/9/20 Fri 11/20/20 4345 7.  Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis 165 days Mon 4/6/20 Fri 11/20/2046 60% Design Updates 3 wks Mon 4/6/20 Fri 4/24/20 25FF,947 90% Design Updates 4 wks Mon 7/6/20 Fri 7/31/20 35FF48 100% Design Updates 3 wks Mon 10/5/20 Fri 10/23/20 42FF49 Hydro/Hydraulic Memo 5 days Mon 10/19/20 Fri 10/23/20 48FF50 PLRM Model Update 10 days Mon 11/9/20 Fri 11/20/20 4351 8. Easement and Real Property Services 90 days Mon 6/22/20 Fri 10/23/2052 (as directed) Preliminary Acquisition Support Services 90 days Mon 6/22/20 Fri 10/23/20 24 1/14
9/7

B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E January February March April May June July August September October November December J2020 2 TaskSplitMilestone
SummaryProject SummaryInactive Task
Inactive MilestoneInactive SummaryManual Task
Duration-onlyManual Summary RollupManual Summary
Start-onlyFinish-onlyExternal Tasks
External MilestoneDeadlineProgress
Manual Progress
Tahoe Valley Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project (Project Schedule)

Project: Tahoe Valley (baseline schedule)Date: Fri 1/3/20 C-007-2020
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:9
Agenda Item:

Award Bid Alternate C to Herback General Engineering's Construction Contract and Accept Funds from Tahoe Fund for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, Phase 2 Executive Summary: The Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, split into two phases, is a vital community and environmental improvement project. Phase 1 of the project is complete as of September 2025. Phase 2 construction began in 2025 and will be completed by the end of the 2026 construction season. On December 10, 2024, City Council awarded Phase 2 of the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project to Herback General Engineering (Herback) for $6,754,601.95 and approved a 10% construction continency. Five bid alternates were included in the bid to allow for award flexibility. Three of the bid alternates were awarded with the original contract. One of the unfunded bid alternates (lighting system) is essential to provide safety for trail users. After coordination with Herback, staff determined that the lighting system could be completed in the 2026 construction season if funding was obtained and a change order was executed by the end of April.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: 1) Pass a Motion awarding Bid Alternate C to Herback General Engineering's Construction Contract for Phase 2 of the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, contingent on the SWRCB Prop 1 Grant extension; and 2) Pass a Resolution authorizing and directing the Director of Public Works or designee to accept the Tahoe Fund grant terms, and authorizing and directing the Director of Finance to appropriate the funds received from Tahoe Fund to the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project.

Responsible Staff Member: Brianna Greenlaw, Senior Civil Engineer Reviewed and Approved By: Mohammad Qureshi, Director of Public Works Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Award Bid Alt C and Tahoe Fund.docx
02-Project Area Map.pdf
03-Resolution - Accept Funds.doc
04-Grant Letter.pdf
427
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Award Bid Alternate C to the Construction Contract, and Accept Funds from Tahoe Fund for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, Phase 2 Location: Tahoe Valley drainage watershed, inclusive to the “Greenbelt” area located behind The Crossing (Refer to Attachment 02 for the Project Location Map.)
Responsible Staff Member: Brianna Greenlaw, Senior Civil Engineer Background: The Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project is a vital community and environmental improvement project. Based on feedback from the public received during the Area Plan process, subsequent design meetings and public survey for the Greenbelt area, the project was developed to provide the benefits requested by the community and stakeholders, including drainage, water quality, public space, new naturalized play structures, and improved active transportation paths.

Due to the size and diversity of the overall project, the City split it into two phases to secure funding from a variety of eligible and applicable funding sources.

1. Phase 1 consisted of stormwater and water quality improvement work within the Bonanza neighborhood and downstream of James Avenue at 3rd Street to Tahoe Keys Blvd.

2. Phase 2 consists of the Central Greenbelt Area (behind the Crossings) spanning between Emerald Bay Road at B Street down to Highway 50 at 4th Street.

Phase 1 of the project is complete as of September 2025. Phase 2 construction began in 2025 and will be completed by the end of the 2026 construction season.

Issue and Discussion: On December 10, 2024, City Council awarded Phase 2 of the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project to Herback General Engineering (Herback) for $6,754,601.95 and approved a 10% construction continency ($675,460.20) as part of Resolution 2024-140.

The low bidder was determined based on an evaluation of the Total Base Bid, which includes the Base Bid and the Compensable Delay. There were two bidders and Herback’s Total Base Bid plus all bid alternates were less than the Base Bid of the other bidder. A summary of the alternates included in the bid and what they consisted of is included in Table 1. Bid Alternates A, D, and E (highlighted in green in Table 1) were awarded with Herback’s contract (C-314-2024) but Bid Alternates B and C (highlighted in red in Table 1) were not due to funding limitations.

Table 1 – Bid Alternates
Herback
Bid
Status
Bid Alternate A – Replace the existing failing storm drain on APN 023-241-040. $82,505
Awarded with contract
Bid Alternate B - full depth pavement rehab of Barton Ave. in project limits. $200,100 Not awarded with contract, not
needed
Bid Alternate C – furnishing and installing poles and luminaire system. $408,000 Not awarded with contract Bid Alternate D – furnishing and installing various greenbelt site furnishings. $78,031 Awarded with contract Bid Alternate E – furnishing and installing playground structures. $95,225 Awarded with contract 428
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Staff did not believe that Bid Alternate B was critical to the project’s success but indicated that funding for Bid Alternate C (furnishing and installing poles and luminaire system) was essential to provide safety for trail users.

Staff strategically created Bid Alternate C to only include the above ground lighting features (poles and luminaires), with the underground infrastructure to be completed as part of the awarded contract so disturbance to the newly installed multi-use paths would not occur.

A separate Capital Improvements Project (CIP) was made for the Tahoe Valley Phase 2 Lighting in order to request funding. Following approval at the January 27, 2026 City Council meeting, staff applied for funding from Tahoe Fund for interpretive signage and unfunded lighting improvements (Bid Alternate C). Staff requested funds for the cost of the playground sign ($14,800), Greenbelt interpretive signage ($4,220), and Bid Alternate C to install light poles and luminaires ($408,000). The playground sign and Greenbelt interpretive signage were previously included as part of the bid award to Herback. Staff was informed that Tahoe Fund would like to fund $19,020 which will pay for the playground and interpretive signage.

Staff coordinated with Herback to determine if they could implement the Bid Alternate C – light poles and luminaires if the City were to award it at this time. Due to material procurement lead times, Herback indicated that a change order would need to be executed no later than the end of April in order to successfully construct the lighting improvements in the 2026 construction season.

Execution of the change order to award Bid Alternate C to Herback is contingent on the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) grant extension. On September 6, 2022, City Council accepted and appropriated SWRCB Proposition 1 Implementation Grant Funding for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project Phases 1 and 2 (Resolution 2022-110). Amendment 1 to the grant extended the work completion date from the original agreement date of February 29, 2024 to February 28, 2026. While this grant provided a large portion of the project funding ($6,922,904), due to delays in obtaining remaining funding to complete both phases, no ground disturbing work being allowed in the Tahoe Basin between October 15th and May 1st), and unforeseen construction delays, it was not feasible to complete Phase 2 construction by February 28, 2026. City staff coordinated with SWRCB staff to extend the grant to September 30, 2026 to allow for completion of Phase 2 construction in the 2026 construction season. SWRCB staff have indicated that this extension is in process and is anticipated to be complete by the end of April. Once the grant extension is complete, staff will extend the Herback construction contract and will proceed with the change order to award Bid Alternate C.

Financial Implications: To ensure successful implementation could occur, City Council approved up to $450,000 for lighting improvements for the Phase 2 Project during the mid-year budget augmentation on March 24, 2026. Funds accepted from Tahoe Fund will allow for already allocated general funds to be utilized for other projects after Phase 2 implementation is complete.

Environmental Considerations: The Planning Commission adopted the CEQA, Mitigated Negative Declaration on May 9, 2019, SCH# 20190292152. Addendum No. 1 adding the basin and associated improvements at the corner of 4th Street and Barton Avenue was adopted by the Planning Commission on February 20, 2025.

Policy Implications: Finishing the lighting system along the proposed trails in the Greenbelt advances the City Council Strategic Priority, Recreation and Equitable Access for All, by facilitating safety along the trail. The new trails prioritize the connection of bicycle and walking trails, from neighborhoods near the Greenbelt to the South Y commercial area and beyond.

The overall project improvements also assist with advancing the City Council Strategic Priority, Protect the Natural Environment, by meeting the sediment and nutrient reductions mandated by the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program. Fulfilling mandated TMDL reduction goals will assist with maximizing residential housing allocations under TRPA Code section 50.5.2.E.2 (Distribution and Administration of Residential Allocations – TMDL Implementation).
429
Map Extent
South Y
Greenbelt - Phase 2
Tahoe Valley SWIP - Phase 1
City Boundary
Lake Tahoe
Path: \\gis\share\Projects\PublicWorks\Engineering\TahoeValleyGreenbelt\TahoeValleyGreenbelt.aprx | Project Area Map | Date Exported: 9/27/2022 0 400 700 1,000 1,000 2,000
Feet
Public Works Department - Engineering
Tahoe Valley Stormwater
Improvement Project Area Map
430
Resolution 2026-XXX April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by City of South Lake Tahoe City Council
April 21, 2026
Accept $19,020 in funds from Tahoe Fund for Phase 2 of the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project
BACKGROUND:

A. The Project (EIP# 01.01.01.0033) is included on the priority list for watershed and water quality improvement projects within the Lake Tahoe basin.

B. On December 10, 2024, City Council awarded Phase 2 of the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project to Herback General Engineering (Herback) for $6,754,601.95 and approved a 10% construction continency ($675,460.20). Three of the five bid alternates were awarded with the contract.

C. One of the bid alternates (Bid Alternate C) which included the lighting system was not awarded with the contract due to funding limitations.

D. Following approval at the January 27, 2026 City Council meeting, staff applied for funding from Tahoe Fund for interpretive signate and unfunded lighting improvements. The request included the cost of the playground sign ($14,800), Greenbelt interpretive signage ($4,220), and Bid Alternate C to install light poles and luminaires ($408,000). The playground sign and interpretive signage were previously allocated funds as part of the bid award to Herback.

E. Tahoe Fund would like to fund $19,020 for the playground sign and interpretive signage. Accepting this award will enable the City to utilize the already allocated general funds for this work on other projects.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorize the Director of Public Works or designee to accept that grant from the Tahoe Fund and execute any necessary agreements.

2. Directs the Director of Finance to appropriate $19,020 received from Tahoe Fund to the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project account (301- 40030-33320 and 48030) as follows:

TO:
301-40030-33320 Tahoe Fund (-) $19,020
(Grant Revenue)
TO:
301-40030-48030 Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt (+) $19,020 Improvement Project
(Construction)
431
Resolution 2026-XXX April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe on April 21, 2026 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
_______________________ Date: _______________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council
432
1 Brianna Greenlaw
From: reply-to+9737a3cf-530b-41d8-85ee-5da40ecda0c5@email.submittable.com on behalf of Tahoe Fund <reply-to+9737a3cf-530b-41d8-85ee-5da40ecda0c5 @email.submittable.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 3:52 PM
To: Brianna Greenlaw
Subject: Tahoe Fund Project Proposal Decision - Congratulations! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Brianna,
Congratulations! On behalf of the Board of the Tahoe Fund, I am pleased to award $19,020 to the City of South Lake Tahoe to go toward kiosks and signage for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project, Phase 2. Our board and staff very much enjoyed reviewing your proposal, and believe it will advance the Tahoe Fund's mission of improving the Lake Tahoe environment for all to enjoy.

Please read this letter in full, and confirm acceptance of the grant requirements set forth in it by clicking the link below. Once you have accepted the terms of the grant, the Tahoe Fund will send a check to the mailing address provided in your submission. If you need to edit your mailing address, please do so in the text box on the grant acceptance page.

By accepting this grant, you confirm that the City of South Lake Tahoe will:
• Use these grant funds solely for the efforts outlined in your proposal. 433
2 • Submit an end-of-year report on the use of funds no later than December 31, 2026 on the Submittable platform. You will receive access to the required grant reporting form via email. Subsequent end-of-year reports will be required for multi-year projects.
• Consent to a potential audit examining use and effectiveness of this grant. • Recognize the Tahoe Fund in any publications or media associated with this donation, and allow the Tahoe Fund to review and approve these materials before they are published.
• Immediately inform the Tahoe Fund if the City of South Lake Tahoe is unable to move forward with this project, or abide by the terms set forth in this letter. In the event this occurs, the Tahoe Fund may terminate the grant upon written notice.

The City of South Lake Tahoe would then be required to return to the Tahoe Fund any portion of the grant funds, including interest earned, not yet used or spent for purposes not specified in this letter or not otherwise approved by the Tahoe Fund.

We very much appreciate your work in our community, and are excited about what's to come! Should you have any questions, please contact me at [email protected].

Congratulations, again!
Sincerely,
Caitlin Meyer
Tahoe Fund Chief Program Officer
434
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:10
Agenda Item: Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Application for the Sugar Pine Village Phase 2B Affordable Housing Project
Executive Summary: The purpose of the AHSC Grant Program is to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through projects that implement land-use, housing, transportation and agricultural land preservation. Related California and City staff have been working closely together to outline specific improvements that can both provide maximum benefit to the community and the project while also maximizing the competitiveness of the application for the Sugar Pine Village Phase 2B Affordable Housing Project. The specific projects outlined in the grant application (currently being prepared), seek to align with the grant objectives and thereby increase the likelihood of being awarded funds.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing staff to submit a joint application with Related Companies of California LLC under the AHSC Program for an amount not to exceed $30,000,000 of which an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 will be provided as a loan for the affordable housing construction and an amount not to exceed $10,000,000 will be provided as a reimbursable grant for Housing Related Infrastructure (HRI), Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (STI), Transit Related Infrastructure (TRA) or Program activities as defined in the AHSC Program Guidelines.

Responsible Staff Member: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Housing Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report - AHSC SPV 2B.docx
02-Resolution - AHSC Round 9 App.docx
435
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 5
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Application for the Sugar Pine Village Phase 2B Affordable Housing Project
Location: 1888 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 1029 Tata Lane
Responsible Staff Members: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Housing Manager Background: Currently under construction, Sugar Pine Village is a 248-unit affordable housing project, with onsite community service facilities on 11.6 acres of land owned by the State of California (State). This project is a result of the Governor’s Executive Order N-06-19, which directed the California Department of General Services (DGS) to identify excess state properties as potential affordable housing development sites. In July 2020, the State announced the State had selected Related Companies of California LLC (Related) in partnership with the St. Joseph Community Land Trust to construct and manage the Sugar Pine Village project.

Since June 2020, the City of South Lake Tahoe has been an active partner in the development of the project. As a first step of financial commitment, the City Council at its November 17th, 2020 meeting authorized a $566,629 loan for predevelopment costs (Resolution 2020-109) and a $1,250,000 loan to purchase banked land coverage at the airport (Resolution 2020-110). The loans were funded by Program Income from repayments of loans from the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund and the City’s undesignated reserve fund, respectively. At its October 19, 2021 meeting the City Council also approved a $627,626 loan of HOME Program Income. This brings the City’s total commitment toward the project to $2,441,629.

In addition to direct City commitments, the City has partnered with Related to secure $17,359,470 in Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) grant funds, $10,551,967 is for the affordable housing project costs and the remaining $6,807,503 is for city improvements. The City and Related were awarded $5,000,000 in Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) grant funding. Additionally, Related has also secured $20,000,000 in Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) funding and $3,195,900 in Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG) funding so far in the financing phase of the project.

To date, approximately $150,000,000 in tax credits and grant applications have been applied for and secured using the City’s initial approximate $2.4 million commitment as a local match.

The Affordable Housing component of the AHSC funding that has been awarded is currently under construction, and the solar, transportation, and pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure component of the award is in the design and moving into the implementation phase this summer. The City and 436
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 5
Related applied for AHSC funds in 2025 and were not awarded. At its February 10, 2026 meeting, the City Council authorized an application for $620,000 in Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP) funds for Phase 2B.

Source Phase 1A Phase 1B Phase 2A Phase 2B Total
City RDA Loan 566,629 - - - 566,629
City Coverage Loan 254,487 - 995,513 - 1,250,000
HOME PI Loan - 625,000 - - 625,000
City Sources 821,116 625,000 995,513 2,441,629
Federal Tax Credit
Equity 19,766,293 17,114,888 - 18,755,003 55,636,184
State Tax Credit
Equity 5,722,864 - - - 5,722,864
Perm Loan 2,768,500 4,448,000 2,015,000 2,380,000 11,611,500 State Housing
Accelerator 23,888,864 23,888,864
State MHP 12,127,500 7,448,016 - - 19,575,516
State AHSC - - 10,551,967 19,680,000 30,231,967
State IIG 3,195,900 2,953,700 2,965,000 2,998,000 12,112,600 State PLHA 4,750,000 - 4,750,000 4,750,000 14,250,000
State HOME - 5,162,446 - 5,910,614 11,073,060
State LGMG 5,638,066 9,999,999 4,304,935 - 19,943,000
State Prohousing 620,000 620,000
FHLBank AHP 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000
Deferred Dev. Fee 500,000 1,970,346 - 4,200,000 6,670,346 Total Sources 56,290,239 49,722,395 49,471,279 59,293,617 214,777,530 Committed Applied For Identified N/A
Issue and Discussion: The purpose of the AHSC Program is to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through projects that implement land-use, housing, transportation and agricultural land preservation. The AHSC Program seeks to accomplish a broad environmental objective, rather than just construct housing, making it a unique program in the field of affordable housing funding sources. Specifically, it mandates that a certain amount of awarded funds be used for non-housing transportation related infrastructure and other infrastructure that provide reductions in GHG emissions. This allows the community to benefit not just from affordable housing but also from the associated infrastructure improvements.

AHSC Program funds are assessed through a highly competitive scoring process that is based in part on the specifics of the proposed non-housing improvements. As such, the project developer and City staff have been working closely together to outline specific improvements that can both provide maximum benefit to the community and the project while also maximizing the competitiveness of the application.
437
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 3 of 5
While separate from the City’s obligations under the AHSC grant, the application may also include a contribution towards interregional and/or local transit. As previously noted, the AHSC Program is designed to achieve the objective of reducing GHG emissions. As such, the specific projects outlined in the grant application (currently being prepared), seek to align with the grant objectives and thereby increase the likelihood of being awarded funds.

Non-housing improvements proposed for the application include pedestrian and bike lane improvements within a two-mile radius of Sugar Pine Village. At the May 7, 2024 City Council meeting, staff presented the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) prioritized list of Active Transportation Projects for the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Councilmember Robbins, seconded by Councilmember Creegan confirmed moving the projects from 1A into the CIP. At this meeting, council members discussed that the prioritization of the projects can be moved if a particular project has a grant opportunity available.

The prioritized list was reviewed by city staff and Related CA to look for a project that aligned with the grant criteria. Per the staff report for this item and discussion by the City Council on May 7, 2024, the prioritization list was not meant to be linear and city council would be updated when grant funds are available for projects that are lower on the prioritization list. Given the constraints and opportunities of scoring for the AHSC program, staff have selected Julie Lane and D Street for bike and pedestrian improvements to meet the length requirement for scoring, the budget, and serving as a link between bike and pedestrian facilities. Staff continues working with transportation agencies on potential projects for this application, as well.

Staff recommends that the City Council pass a motion adopting a resolution authorizing staff to submit a joint application with Related Companies of California LLC under the AHSC Program for an amount not to exceed $30,000,000 of which an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 will be provided as a loan for the affordable housing construction and an amount not to exceed $10,000,000 will be provided as a reimbursable grant for Housing Related Infrastructure (HRI), Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (STI), Transit Related Infrastructure (TRA) or Program activities as defined in the AHSC Program Guidelines. While these are not to exceed amounts, the actual application request will likely be approximately $15,000,000+/- for the affordable housing and $7,000,000+/- for the non-housing infrastructure improvements. AHSC Program applications are due by May 4th with award announcements anticipated in December 2026.

Financial Implications: The AHSC Program application will contain approximately $7,000,000 of “non-housing” related improvements of which the City, as the joint applicant, will carry primary responsibility for completion.

City responsibilities will include providing the initial capital for approximately $6,000,000 of identified improvements consistent with the AHSC Program Guidelines. Expenditures consistent with and in compliance with the award agreement are reimbursable to the City up to the maximum agreed amount. The City is responsible for providing the funds up front for the projects and are reimbursed by the state.

Environmental Considerations: For projects that satisfy criteria specified by SB 35, the guidelines issued by HCD specify that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to actions taken by a local government to provide financial assistance to a development that 438
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 4 of 5
receives streamlined approval and that is to be used for housing for persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.

Construction of sidewalks and bike trails is considered categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities, which exempts minor alteration of existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing use. An example provided by the CEQA Guidelines includes alterations of existing streets for the addition of bicycle facilities, transit improvements, pedestrian crossings, and other similar alterations that do not create additional automobile lanes.

Policy Implications: The recommended action is consistent with the City Strategic Plan which identifies supporting the Sugar Pine Village Project as Action Item 1.1.

The recommended action is also consistent with the following adopted policies and programs:

City General Plan Housing Element
Policy 1-1 The City shall adopt programs, ordinances, incentives, land use plans and other regulatory mechanisms that provide opportunities for the private sector to address the housing needs of citizens of all economic levels.

Policy 2-2 The City shall enable opportunities for deed-restricted affordable ownership housing to ensure long-term affordability.

Policy 2-5 The City shall recognize that it will become difficult to attract employees if they cannot afford to purchase or rent housing in South Lake Tahoe. The City shall encourage and support programs and activities that create a robust local economy that provides residents with good paying employment and the means to purchase and/or rent housing in the city.

Program 2-1 Pursue State and Federal Funds
To support the creation of quality, affordable housing options for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households, the City shall seek and when appropriate and feasible pursue grant opportunities for state and federal funds.

City of South Lake Tahoe Climate Action Plan
Action Item WB-1 Improve bicycle and pedestrian network and support use of e-bikes Use the community planning process and individual project applications to continue to improve and expand bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and options, especially those in winter.

Action Item LUP-1 Encourage complete neighborhoods
Promote complete and distinct neighborhoods through zoning and permitting that promote walking, biking, and taking transit to services to reduce vehicle use. Use incentives for zoning and transit-oriented development to site new development near jobs and transit, enabling a greater percentage of the workforce to live near work and transit. City neighborhoods should foster community pride, enhance public safety, and be family friendly. 439
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 5 of 5
Action Item LUP-2 Ensure a healthy jobs-to-housing balance by prioritizing dense mixed-use development
Implement GHG reductions through area plans by concentrating commercial and medium- to highdensity residential development near designated City centers that can be served efficiently by public transit and alternative transportation modes, such as major bike paths. Ensure that allocated land for parking areas is minimized and that pedestrian, bus, and bike pathways are available.

Action Item LUP-3 Prioritize workforce and affordable housing Use regulatory and voluntary tools to increase the inventory of workforce housing along existing and planned higher capacity bus routes, more frequent transit services, and near services and jobs. Identify additional affordable workforce housing opportunities as part of the General Plan update land use plan and future development projects. Work with developers to provide incentives for and encourage affordable housing projects.
440
Resolution 2026-XXX April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 3
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 21, 2026
A Resolution of the Governing Body of City of South Lake Tahoe authorizing the application for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Round 10 Grant Application as a Joint Applicant with The Related Companies of California LLC (“Developer”) for the Sugar Pine Village (“Project”) Phase 2B Affordable Housing Development located at 1029 Tata Lane and 1888 Lake Tahoe Blvd.

BACKGROUND
A. The funding and development of Sugar Pine Village aligns with the following policies and programs in the City’s 2022-2027 Housing Element: Policy 1-1, Policy 2-2, Policy 2-5, and Program 2-1. The Project also aligns with the following action items in the City’s Climate Action Plan: Action Item WB-1, LUP-1, LUP-2, and LUP-3.

B. The State of California, the Strategic Growth Council (“SGC”) and the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department” has issued a Notice of Funding Availability (“NOFA”) dated February 25, 2026, under the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (“AHSC”) Program.

C. The SGC is authorized to approve funding allocations for the AHSC Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the NOFA, AHSC Program Round 10 Guidelines adopted by SGC on February 26, 2025 (“Program Guidelines”).

D. The AHSC Program provides grants and loans to applicants identified through a competitive process for the development of projects that, per the Program Guidelines, will create new affordable housing and achieve greenhouse gas reductions and benefit communities through increased accessibility to affordable housing, employment centers and key destinations via low-carbon transportation.

E. The AHSC Program requires that joint applicants for a project will be held jointly and severally liable for completion of such project and the Developer has requested the City to be a joint applicant for its project located at 1029 Tata Lane 1888 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 (“Sugar Pine Village”).
441
Resolution 2026-XXX April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 3
F. The City plans to perform and construct transit related amenities, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian improvements within a two-mile vicinity of Sugar Pine Village (the “Transit Improvements”).

G. The City desires to apply for AHSC Program Round 10 funds and submit an Application Package as a joint applicant with the Developer.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorizes submission of the application to the AHSC Program as detailed in the NOFA dated March 25, 2025, for Round 10, in a total amount not to exceed $30,000,000.00 of which an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 will be provided as a loan for an Affordable Housing Development (“AHD”) (“AHSC Loan”) and $10,000,000 will be provided as a grant for Housing-Related Infrastructure (“HRI”), Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (“STI”), Transit-Related Amenities (“TRA”) or Program (‘PGM”) activities (“AHSC Grant”) as defined the AHSC Program Guidelines and sign AHSC Program documents; and

2. The City shall assume any joint and several liability for completion of the Project required by the terms of any grant awarded to the City and the Developer under the AHSC Program; and

3. If the Application is successful, the City shall be authorized to execute a CoApplicant Agreement with Developer in the form approved by the City Manager; and

4. The City shall be authorized to execute a Standard Agreement, with terms and conditions that AHSC Program funds are to be used for allowable capital asset project expenditures to be identified in Exhibit A of the Standard Agreement, that the Application Package in full is incorporated as part of the Standard Agreement, and that any and all activities funded, information provided, and timelines represented in the application are enforceable through the Standard Agreement; and

5. The City authorizes the City Manager, to execute and deliver any documents in the name of the City that are necessary, appropriate or advisable to secure the AHSC Program funds from the Department, and all amendments thereto, and complete the transactions contemplated herein and to use the funds for eligible capital asset(s) in the manner presented in the application as approved by the 442
Resolution 2026-XXX April 21, 2026 Page 3 of 3
Department and in accordance with the NOFA and Program Guidelines and Application Package.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on April 21, 2026 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
443
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:11
Agenda Item: Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Application for the Affordable Housing Project at 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard Executive Summary: The purpose of the AHSC Grant Program is to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through projects that implement land-use, housing, transportation and agricultural land preservation. NDC Lake Tahoe, LP and City staff have been working closely together to outline specific improvements that can both provide maximum benefit to the community and the project while also maximizing the competitiveness of the application for the 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd. Affordable Housing Project. The specific projects outlined in the grant application (currently being prepared), seek to align with the grant objectives and thereby increase the likelihood of being awarded funds.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing staff to submit a joint application with NDC Lake Tahoe LP under the AHSC Program for an amount not to exceed $30,000,000 of which an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 will be provided as a loan for the affordable housing construction and an amount not to exceed $10,000,000 will be provided as a reimbursable grant for Housing Related Infrastructure (HRI), Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (STI), Transit Related Infrastructure (TRA) or Program activities as defined in the AHSC Program Guidelines.

Responsible Staff Member: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Housing Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report - AHSC 3900 LTB.docx
02-Resolution - AHSC Round 10 App.docx
444
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 5
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Application for the 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd. Affordable Housing Project
Location: 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard
Responsible Staff Members: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Housing Manager Background: On June 3, 2022 the South Lake Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency released a Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Notice of Availability (NOA) to Sell/Lease Surplus Property located at 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd. (APNs: 029-170-01 and 029-170-02). Per the Surplus Land Act, the NOA provided 60 days for interested parties to notify the South Lake Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency regarding interest in acquiring the property.

Three offers were submitted from Novin Development and SMR Development, Saint Joseph Community Land Trust, and the City of South Lake Tahoe. Upon review of the proposals by staff, the proposal submitted by Novin Development and SMR Development was determined to be the most consistent with the criteria outlined in the Notice of Availability. At its August 23, 2022 meeting, the City Council approved a Letter of Intent outlining the timelines and commitments associated with negotiating a purchase agreement, conducting due diligence, and escrow.

As directed by Council, staff began negotiating terms of a purchase and sale agreement for Successor Agency and City Council approval that includes additional project details, financing details, and development timelines. The City was a party to this agreement in addition to the Successor Agency because under the Dissolution Acts of 2011, the Successor Agency is not able to enter into any new obligations besides disposing of property.

On November 7, 2023, the Successor Agency, City, and Novin Development Corp. (the predecessor of NDC Lake Tahoe, LP) entered into an Agreement for Purchase and Sale and Initial Escrow Instructions for the Property, in which the Successor Agency would sell the Property to the City and then the City would sell the Property to Novin, which was filed in the City of South Lake Tahoe records as Contract No. C-240-2023 (Attachment 5). On May 7, 2024, the City Council authorized the Mayor to enter into the Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement (Agreement) with NDC Lake Tahoe, LP for $564,073 in awarded Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Formula funds to be used for predevelopment costs associated with the affordable housing project at 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (Attachment 6).

On July 8, 2024, the City received the Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP) grant award letter for $620,000 with $500,000 allocated for the affordable housing project at 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe 445
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 5
Boulevard and $120,000 allocated for the rehabilitation of Tahoe Coalition for the Homeless’ (TCH) three Homekey properties.

On August 27, 2024, City Council passed Resolution 2024-090 directing staff to set aside $1,000,000 from the General Fund’s Undesignated Excess Reserves to leverage state and federal funding opportunities to fully fund the affordable housing project at 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard.

This project is proposed to consist of a minimum of 72 residential units which would be deedrestricted to low and/or moderate-income households for a period of no less than 55 years, as well as community amenities on the ground floor on about 1.16 acres of land. The project will also contain one manager’s unit and two live-work ancillary commercial units. On April 17, 2025, the Planning Commission approved the TRPA Multi-Family Dwelling Project Application for this project.

On May 20, 2025, City Council passed Motion 2025-047 authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment Number 1 to the Predevelopment Loan and Development Agreement with NDC Lake Tahoe, LP (C-092-2025) to loan an additional $500,000 in PIP grant funds for a total of $1,064,073 in PLHA and PIP funds for 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd predevelopment and development costs. An Amended and Restated Predevelopment Loan Promissory Note for 3900 and 3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard increasing the loan amount to $1,064,073, extending the Agreement deadline to June 30, 2026, and adding language for the incorporation of the local preference policy per Resolution 2025-006, subject to this development was executed. Council also passed Resolution 2025-043 authorizing the Finance Director to appropriate the remaining $500,000 in PIP funds into the revenue and expense budget line items for the predevelopment loan.

The Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) grant is designed and awarded by California Strategic Growth Council and is implemented through California Housing and Community Development Department. This grant integrates some of the state’s top priorities, centered around affordable housing projects.

Issue and Discussion: The purpose of the AHSC Program is to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through projects that implement land-use, housing, transportation and agricultural land preservation. The AHSC Program seeks to accomplish a broad environmental objective, rather than just construct housing, making it a unique program in the field of affordable housing funding sources. Specifically, it mandates that a certain amount of awarded funds be used for non-housing transportation related infrastructure and other infrastructure that provide reductions in GHG emissions. This allows the community to benefit not just from affordable housing but also from the associated infrastructure improvements.

AHSC Program funds are assessed through a highly competitive scoring process that is based in part on the specifics of the proposed non-housing improvements. As such, the project developer and City staff have been working closely together to outline specific improvements that can both provide maximum benefit to the community and the project while also maximizing the competitiveness of the application.
446
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 3 of 5
While separate from the City’s obligations under the AHSC grant, the application may also include a contribution towards interregional and/or local transit. As previously noted, the AHSC Program is designed to achieve the objective of reducing GHG emissions. As such, the specific projects outlined in the grant application (currently being prepared), seek to align with the grant objectives and thereby increase the likelihood of being awarded funds.

Non-housing improvements proposed for the application include pedestrian and bike lane improvements within a two-mile radius of 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard affordable housing project. At the May 7, 2024 City Council meeting, staff presented the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) prioritized list of Active Transportation Projects for the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Councilmember Robbins, seconded by Councilmember Creegan confirmed moving the projects from 1A into the CIP. At this meeting, council members discussed that the prioritization of the projects can be moved if a particular project has a grant opportunity available.

The prioritized list was reviewed by city staff and NDC Lake Tahoe, LP to look for a project that aligned with the grant criteria. Per the staff report for this item and discussion by the City Council on May 7, 2024, the prioritization list was not meant to be linear and city council would be updated when grant funds are available for projects that are lower on the prioritization list. Given the constraints and opportunities of scoring for the AHSC program, staff have selected Stateline Avenue for bike and pedestrian improvements to meet the length requirement for scoring, the budget, and serving as a link between bike and pedestrian facilities. Staff continues working with transportation agencies on potential improvements.

Staff recommends that the City Council pass a motion to adopt a resolution authorizing staff to submit a joint application with NDC Lake Tahoe, LP under the AHSC Program for an amount not to exceed $30,000,000 of which an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 will be provided as a loan for the affordable housing construction and an amount not to exceed $10,000,000 will be provided as a reimbursable grant for Housing Related Infrastructure (HRI), Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (STI), Transit Related Infrastructure (TRA) or Program activities as defined in the AHSC Program Guidelines. While these are not to exceed amounts, the actual application request will likely be approximately $15,000,000+/- for the affordable housing and $7,000,000+/- for the non-housing infrastructure improvements. AHSC Program applications are due by May 4th with award announcements anticipated in December 2026.

Financial Implications: The AHSC Program application will contain approximately $7,000,000 of “non-housing” related improvements of which the City, as the joint applicant, will carry primary responsibility for completion.

City responsibilities will include providing the initial capital for approximately $7,000,000 of identified improvements consistent with the AHSC Program Guidelines. Expenditures consistent with and in compliance with the award agreement are reimbursable to the City up to the maximum agreed amount. The City is responsible for providing the funds up front for the projects and are reimbursed by the state.

Environmental Considerations: For projects that satisfy criteria specified by SB 35, the guidelines issued by HCD specify that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to actions taken by a local government to provide financial assistance to a development that 447
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 4 of 5
receives streamlined approval and that is to be used for housing for persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.

Construction of sidewalks and bike trails is considered categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities, which exempts minor alteration of existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing use. An example provided by the CEQA Guidelines includes alterations of existing streets for the addition of bicycle facilities, transit improvements, pedestrian crossings, and other similar alterations that do not create additional automobile lanes.

Policy Implications: The recommended action is consistent with the City Strategic Plan which identifies supporting the 3900 Lake Tahoe Boulevard project as Action Item 1.2.

The recommended action is also consistent with the following adopted policies and programs:

City General Plan Housing Element
Policy 1-1 The City shall adopt programs, ordinances, incentives, land use plans and other regulatory mechanisms that provide opportunities for the private sector to address the housing needs of citizens of all economic levels.

Policy 2-2 The City shall enable opportunities for deed-restricted affordable ownership housing to ensure long-term affordability.

Policy 2-5 The City shall recognize that it will become difficult to attract employees if they cannot afford to purchase or rent housing in South Lake Tahoe. The City shall encourage and support programs and activities that create a robust local economy that provides residents with good paying employment and the means to purchase and/or rent housing in the city.

Program 2-1 Pursue State and Federal Funds
To support the creation of quality, affordable housing options for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households, the City shall seek and when appropriate and feasible pursue grant opportunities for state and federal funds.

City of South Lake Tahoe Climate Action Plan
Action Item WB-1 Improve bicycle and pedestrian network and support use of e-bikes Use the community planning process and individual project applications to continue to improve and expand bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and options, especially those in winter.

Action Item LUP-1 Encourage complete neighborhoods
Promote complete and distinct neighborhoods through zoning and permitting that promote walking, biking, and taking transit to services to reduce vehicle use. Use incentives for zoning and transit-oriented development to site new development near jobs and transit, enabling a greater percentage of the workforce to live near work and transit. City neighborhoods should foster community pride, enhance public safety, and be family friendly. 448
Council Agenda Report - April 21, 2026 Page 5 of 5
Action Item LUP-2 Ensure a healthy jobs-to-housing balance by prioritizing dense mixed-use development
Implement GHG reductions through area plans by concentrating commercial and medium- to highdensity residential development near designated City centers that can be served efficiently by public transit and alternative transportation modes, such as major bike paths. Ensure that allocated land for parking areas is minimized and that pedestrian, bus, and bike pathways are available.

Action Item LUP-3 Prioritize workforce and affordable housing Use regulatory and voluntary tools to increase the inventory of workforce housing along existing and planned higher capacity bus routes, more frequent transit services, and near services and jobs. Identify additional affordable workforce housing opportunities as part of the General Plan update land use plan and future development projects. Work with developers to provide incentives for and encourage affordable housing projects.
449
Resolution 2026-XXX April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 3
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 21, 2026
A Resolution of the Governing Body of City of South Lake Tahoe authorizing the application for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Round 10 Grant Application as a Joint Applicant with NDC Lake Tahoe, LP (“Developer”) for the 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd. (“Project”) Affordable Housing Development located at 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd.

BACKGROUND
A. The funding and development of 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard project aligns with the following policies and programs in the City’s 2022-2027 Housing Element: Policy 1-1, Policy 2-2, Policy 2-5, and Program 2-1. The Project also aligns with the following action items in the City’s Climate Action Plan: Action Item WB-1, LUP-1, LUP-2, and LUP-3.

B. The State of California, the Strategic Growth Council (“SGC”) and the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department” has issued a Notice of Funding Availability (“NOFA”) dated March 4, 2025, under the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (“AHSC”) Program.

C. The SGC is authorized to approve funding allocations for the AHSC Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the NOFA, AHSC Program Round 10 Guidelines adopted by SGC on February 25, 2026 (“Program Guidelines”).

D. The AHSC Program provides grants and loans to applicants identified through a competitive process for the development of projects that, per the Program Guidelines, will create new affordable housing and achieve greenhouse gas reductions and benefit communities through increased accessibility to affordable housing, employment centers and key destinations via low-carbon transportation.

E. The AHSC Program requires that joint applicants for a project will be held jointly and severally liable for completion of such project and the Developer has requested the City to be a joint applicant for its project located at 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 (“3900 Lake Tahoe Blvd.”).

F. The City plans to perform and construct transit related amenities, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian improvements within a two-mile vicinity of 3900/3908 Lake Tahoe Blvd. Project (the “Transit Improvements”). 450
Resolution 2026-XXX April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 3
G. The City desires to apply for AHSC Program Round 10 funds and submit an Application Package as a joint applicant with the Developer.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorizes submission of the application to the AHSC Program as detailed in the NOFA dated March 4, 2026, for Round 10, in a total amount not to exceed $30,000,000.00 of which an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 will be provided as a loan for an Affordable Housing Development (“AHD”) (“AHSC Loan”) and $10,000,000 will be provided as a grant for Housing-Related Infrastructure (“HRI”), Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (“STI”), Transit-Related Amenities (“TRA”) or Program (‘PGM”) activities (“AHSC Grant”) as defined the AHSC Program Guidelines and sign AHSC Program documents; and

2. The City shall assume any joint and several liability for completion of the Project required by the terms of any grant awarded to the City and the Developer under the AHSC Program; and

3. If the Application is successful, the City shall be authorized to execute a CoApplicant Agreement with Developer in the form approved by the City Manager; and

4. The City shall be authorized to execute a Standard Agreement, with terms and conditions that AHSC Program funds are to be used for allowable capital asset project expenditures to be identified in Exhibit A of the Standard Agreement, that the Application Package in full is incorporated as part of the Standard Agreement, and that any and all activities funded, information provided, and timelines represented in the application are enforceable through the Standard Agreement; and

5. The City authorizes the City Manager, to execute and deliver any documents in the name of the City that are necessary, appropriate or advisable to secure the AHSC Program funds from the Department, and all amendments thereto, and complete the transactions contemplated herein and to use the funds for eligible capital asset(s) in the manner presented in the application as approved by the Department and in accordance with the NOFA and Program Guidelines and Application Package.
451
Resolution 2026-XXX April 21, 2026 Page 3 of 3
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on April 21, 2026 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
452
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:12
Agenda Item: Amendment to Agreement with CDM Smith, Inc. for Surveying and Easement Acquisition Services for the Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway Phase 1C Executive Summary: The proposed Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement to complete the Task Group A portion of the project design (survey, right-of-way analysis and pre-acquisition services) will allow an additional eighteen months to advance the design and complete pre-acquisition activities consistent with the 2011 conceptual alignment of the path approved by the Planning Commission on October 9, 2014.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM Smith, Inc. to allow an additional eighteen months to complete the Scope of Work. This Amendment extends the term to October 23, 2027.

Responsible Staff Member: Emily Dougherty, Associate Transportation Planner Reviewed and Approved By: Mohammad Qureshi, Director of Public Works Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - CDM Smith PSA Amendment 1.docx
02-Amendment 1 to Agreement with CDM Smith, Inc.doc
03-C-267-2024 CDM Smith.pdf
453
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement between CDM Smith, Inc. and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway Phase IC Location Pioneer Trail (Herbert Avenue to Ski Run Boulevard) Responsible Staff Member: Emily Dougherty, Associate Transportation Planner Background: The Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway Trail will connect the Tahoe Sierra Neighborhood to Van Sickle Bi-State Park via a series of paved bicycle and pedestrian trails, completing the core of the non-motorized transportation network in the South Shore. Previously known as the South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail, the original project approval and preliminary designs occurred in 2011 and were amended in 2016 with the California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC) acting in the lead role for delivery of the project.

Phase 1A of the Greenway extends between Herbert Avenue and Glenwood Way in the heart of the Bijou neighborhood in South Lake Tahoe. This project phase was built in 2016 and is open to public use. Phases 1B and 2 of the Greenway extended the trail south across Bijou Creek Meadow, crossing Al Tahoe Boulevard to Lake Tahoe Community College (LTCC). From LTCC, the trail crosses Trout Creek and Martin Avenue to provide a safe route to Sierra Boulevard in the Tahoe Sierra neighborhood. This project connects to the City of South Lake Tahoe’s Sierra Boulevard Complete Streets project and extends the bike trail network to destinations on the western side of the City. Phases 1B and 2 were completed in 2021 and are open to public use.

Phase 1C of the Greenway will extend from Herbert Ave. to Ski Run Blvd. To complete Phase 1C of the Greenway, the City has been awarded $800,000 in grant funds from the California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC) to supplement existing City funds to complete pre-acquisition work, right-of-way surveying, feasibility studies, alternatives analysis, and updates to the environmental document to move forward with the design of the project.

Issue and Discussion: On October 23, 2024, the City entered into an Agreement with CDM Smith to provide engineering design services for Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway Phase 1C for an eighteenmonth term ending on April 23, 2026. The project has been delayed due to right-of-way acquisition challenges. The appraisal process has begun and the project is making progress on the scope of work described in the Professional Services Agreement C-267-2024 included in Task Group A (Attachment 3).

There is a desire to extend the term of this agreement by an additional eighteen months, until October 23, 2027, to allow the Consultant additional time to complete the Scope of Services described in Task Group A.

Financial Implications: The entire scope of services described the Professional Services Agreement C267-2024 is fully funded using the $800,000 in CTC planning grant funds previously accepted by Resolution 2024-047 to advance the project with the goal of becoming “shovel ready.” No additional funds are being requested at this time. The Professional Services Agreement for Task Group A is for a not to exceed amount of $381,620. Amendment No 1. does not increase the contract amount and only extends the term of the agreement.
454
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Environmental Considerations: The CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved with the CTC as the lead agency on September 16, 2011 (SCH# 2006112070).

Policy Implications: Authorizing this Professional Services Agreement time extension will allow for the continuation of design and environmental work for the Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway Phase 1C project that will advance the City Council Strategic Priorities and Goals, specifically:

Priority 7: Recreation and Equitable Access for All:

7.3 Increase connectivity and safety

7.7 Continue to improve access for people of all abilities to all public spaces. 455
City of South Lake Tahoe – CDM Smith
PSA Amendment No. 1 to C-267-2024
AMENDMENT 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
The Professional Services Agreement C-267-2024 entered on October 23, 2024, between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation ("CITY") and CDM Smith, Inc. ("CONSULTANT") is hereby amended as set forth below.

The terms of the Professional Services Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows:

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of this Agreement and shall continue until all authorized work is approved by City. All such work shall be completed not later than October 23, 2027. Time is of the essence, and failure of Consultant to perform the services required by this Agreement, as amended, by October 23, 2027 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement as amended.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CONSULTANT
By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor William E. Hurrell, Vice President
CDM Smith, Inc.

Business License # 320810

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ __________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney Susan Blankenship, City Clerk CITY SEAL:
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:13
Agenda Item: Purchase of HPE Alletra 5010 Storage Array and Five-Year Support Contract Executive Summary: This purchase will replace the City’s existing HPE Nimble storage array, which was originally purchased in 2018 and is now aging and no longer supported by the manufacturer.

Because the current array supports core information technology operations, continued reliance on unsupported infrastructure increases the risk of hardware failure, service disruption, and difficulty obtaining replacement parts or vendor support.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion: 1) Approving the purchase of an HPE Alletra 5010 storage array with five years of manufacturer support under the NASPO ValuePoint cooperative purchasing agreement in the amount of $139,700.45; and 2) Authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the necessary purchase documents to complete the acquisition.

Responsible Staff Member: Gabriel Raab, Senior IT Analyst Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - Storage Array and Five-Year Support.docx 02 - Airport Storage Refresh.pdf
03 - Cadence - California NASPO ValuePoint DataCom AR3228 Letter of Authorization.docx.pdf 499
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Purchase Authorization – HPE Alletra 5010 Storage Array and Five-Year Support Agreement
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Gabriel Raab, Senior IT Analyst Background: The proposed purchase of an HPE Alletra 5010 storage array will replace the City’s existing HPE Nimble storage array, which was originally purchased in 2018.

The current storage infrastructure is aging and is no longer supported by the manufacturer. Replacing the system is necessary to maintain reliable storage services for the City’s finance and information technology environments, reduce the risk of hardware failure, and ensure continued support for critical business systems and data storage needs.

Issue and Discussion: The City’s current HPE Nimble storage array was acquired in 2018 and has served as a core component of the City’s information technology infrastructure. This system supports storage needs for City servers, applications, and operational data.

As the system has aged, it has reached a point where manufacturer support is no longer available. Unsupported infrastructure presents increasing operational risk, including:
 Greater likelihood of service disruption due to hardware failure;  Inability to obtain technical support or replacement parts in a timely manner;  Increased exposure to outages affecting business-critical systems;  Reduced ability to maintain a secure, stable, and resilient computing environment.

To address these risks, staff evaluated replacement options and identified the HPE Alletra 5010 as the appropriate successor platform to meet the City’s current and anticipated storage requirements.

The proposed HPE Alletra 5010 will provide modernized storage infrastructure for the City’s virtual server environment and associated enterprise systems. The purchase includes five years of manufacturer support, which will help ensure continued vendor 500
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 2
assistance, software updates, hardware coverage, and lifecycle stability over the term of ownership.

Replacing the current array at this time is prudent for several reasons:
 The existing HPE Nimble array is beyond its supported lifecycle;  Continued reliance on unsupported infrastructure increases the risk of unplanned downtime;
 New hardware will improve reliability and maintainability of the City’s core IT systems;
 A supported platform helps staff better sustain City operations and respond to issues efficiently.

This purchase is consistent with sound asset lifecycle management and supports continuity of operations for City departments that depend on reliable access to systems and data.

Staff recommends the purchase of an HPE Alletra 5010 storage array, including five years of manufacturer support, to replace the City’s existing HPE Nimble storage array, in the amount of $139,700.45, to be funded from the IT Machinery and Equipment account (10001840-46110). The purchase will be made through a NASPO ValuePoint cooperative purchasing agreement.

Financial Implications: Funding for this purchase in the amount of $ $139,700.45 per the attached quote is available in the current year’s 2025/26 budget in account 10001840-46110. This purchase will be made through a NASPO ValuePoint cooperative purchasing agreement. NASPO ValuePoint is a nationwide cooperative procurement program administered by the National Association of State Procurement Officials. It allows public agencies to purchase goods and services from competitively solicited and publicly awarded contracts, which can reduce procurement time, leverage cooperative pricing, and help ensure compliance with public purchasing requirements.

Environmental Considerations: This action is not a project requiring review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) (organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

Policy Implications: This action is consistent with Strategic Priority Efficient Government, Action Item 2.8, Evaluate appropriate systems and tools for processes and communications that are cyber safe.
501
Remittance Address:
4010 Foothills Blvd, Ste 103 PMB205 Phone: 844.934.8326 Roseville, CA 95747 Fax: 844.923.5878
www.cadence.team
Company: City of South Lake Tahoe Date: 4/2/2026 Expiration: 4/15/2026 Attn: Gabe Raab Shipping Method: GROUND Sales Rep: Jeremy_Caudill Project: Airport Storage Refresh Est. Delivery: TBD Direct: 916.710.8264 Contract #: NASPO AR 3228 Terms: NET30 Email: [email protected] Part Number Description Qty. List Price Unit Price Extended Tx Disc % Storage
(UCID): 5144827960-01 HPE CTO ONLY HPE ALLETRA 5010 1 $369,745.00 $73,949.00 $73,949.00 T 80% Support - 5YRS
HPE CTO ONLY HPE AL STG 5000 /TB 5YR SW/SUP SAAS
PL-JW
42 $575.50 $287.75 $12,085.50 N 50%
HPE CTO ONLY HPE 5Y TECH CARE ESSENTIAL SVC PL721 $55,524.01 $47,195.41 $47,195.41 N 15% Professional Services
HP TECHNICAL INSTATION STARTUP 1 $7,112.01 $0.00 $0.00 N 100% Taxable: $73,949.00
Non Taxable: $59,280.91
Tax: $6,470.54
Credit: $0.00
Freight: $0.00
Total: $139,700.45
Tax Rate: 8.750%
Terms and Conditions
Warranty: NA
Maintenance: NA
Terms: No Returns
Equipment: All orders invoice upon receipt of purchase order Customer Signature authorizes Cadence Team to process the order in place of a purchase order. Prices are subject to change after the expiration date of the quote.

Customer Signature:

Print:

Title:

Date:
502
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
NASPO ValuePoint Data Communications Indirect Fulfillment Partner Program May 10, 2021
Cadence Team Inc.
733 Sherwood Drive
Yuba City, CA 95991
Dear Cadence Team,
This letter confirms authorization to participate in the HPE NASPO ValuePoint Data Communication Indirect Fulfillment Partner Program under the HPE NASPO ValuePoint Data Communications Master Agreement #AR3228 for the state listed below. Participation is governed by the US Public Sector Addendum and the USPS Addendum NASPO ValuePoint Data Com Contract Exhibit. All information pertaining to this contract can be found at
https://government.hpe.com/hpe/Contracts/datacomm_2019_2024.

Partner Name
Cadence
partner location id
10332596
approved State
California
state Participating Addendum #
7-20-70-47-04
Regards,
Nancy Schwarz
Contracts Program Manager - West
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Cell (480) 636-0267
Email: [email protected]
503
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:14
Agenda Item: Tentative Subdivision Map for Zalanta II Resort at the Village Executive Summary: The City Development Services Department received a Tentative Subdivision Map application from Jacksonville Hospitality Group FL LLC to subdivide the previously approved Zalanta II Resort at the Village Project. The applicant proposed to subdivide the project into 60 hotelcondominium units and one accessory space unit. At its February 19, 2026 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted resolution 2025-006 recommending that the City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution: 1) finding the Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the City General Plan, the Tourist Core Area Plan, and the City-Wide Design Standards, and meets the findings required by the California Subdivision Map Act; 2) finding the Tentative Subdivision Map will not have a significant effect on the environment as disclosed in the EIR/EIS for Redevelopment Project 3 and the subsequent 2007 Second Addendum; and 3) approving the Tentative Subdivision Map (File #TSM25-002).

Responsible Staff Member: John Hitchcock, Planning Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Zachary Thomas, Director of Development Services Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report.docx
02-Plan Set.pdf
03-Location Map.pdf
04-Resolution 2026-006_Zalanta II Resort at the Village Tentative Map.pdf 05-Zalanta II - Tentative Map for Condominium Purposes.pdf 06-Resolution.docx
07-TDT Proof of Publication v2 20260406.pdf
504
City Council Agenda Report- April 21, 2026 Page 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: Tentative Subdivision Map for Zalanta II Resort at the Village Location: 4101 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, 965 Friday Avenue, 4066 and 4080 Cedar Avenue Responsible Staff Members: John Hitchcock, Planning Manager Background:

The City Development Services Department received a Tentative Subdivision Map application from Jacksonville Hospitality Group FL LLC to subdivide the previously approved Zalanta II Resort at the Village Project (“Zalanta Phase 2”) project. The applicant proposed to subdivide the project into 60 hotel-condominium units and one accessory space unit.

The Zalanta Phase 2 project was previously approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2016 (see Attachment 02). At that time, the Planning Commission passed a motion and made the following findings:

1. Found the Zalanta Phase 2 to be consistent with the original 2007 project approval, as analyzed in the EIR/EIS for Redevelopment Project #3 and the subsequent 2007 Second Addendum, and thus, additional environmental analysis is not required.

2. Found the Zalanta Phase 2 Project was substantially consistent with the 2007 and 2013 approved projects and conditions of the approval and approved Major Design Review Permit #16-177.

The project site is located directly behind the Zalanta Phase 1 Project, which fronts Lake Tahoe Boulevard, and is bounded by Friday Avenue on the west and Cedar Avenue on the north. See Attachment 03 for a location map.

On February 19, 2026, the Planning Commission held a regularly scheduled public hearing to consider the tentative subdivision map application. After receiving public testimony and deliberating, the Planning Commission passed Resolution 2026-006 recommending the City Council approve the tentative subdivision map for Zalanta Phase 2 (see Attachment 04).

The project has an approved active building permit on file (Permit #22120086 and #EXTEN26- 0003) for sitework that includes grading and site preparation.

Issue and Discussion:

MAP REVIEW
Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (SMA), the Tentative Subdivision Map (“Tentative Map”) is required for creating five or more parcels. The Tentative Subdivision process is the first step in obtaining approval from the legislative body before a Final Subdivision Map (“Final Map”) is recorded, which allows the legal sale or financing of new lots or units.

Pursuant to the SMA, the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map (see Attachment 05) was prepared by a licensed land surveyor and includes the required contents, which include property 505
City Council Agenda Report- April 21, 2026 Page 2
owner and land surveyor information, site topography, existing infrastructure, if applicable, public utility easements, vicinity map, and legal description.

The Tentative Map includes four contiguous parcels totaling 1.59 acres. The Map is located in Zone X pursuant to FEMA Firm Map #06017C0380F dated April 13, 2012, which is outside the 100-year floodplain. Upon approval of the Final Map and recording with El Dorado County, the parcels will be merged into a single parcel.

The Map does not show the proposed condominium units. Per SMA Section 66427(b), a map need not include a condominium plan or plans at the time a Tentative Map is approved by the legislative body.

After the Tentative Map is approved, a Final Map must be submitted to the City within 24 months; otherwise, the period may be extended pursuant to the SMA. The Final Map will be accompanied by a condominium plan describing the legal boundaries of each airspace unit. The Final Map will be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department in coordination with the El Dorado County Surveyor’s Office prior to consideration by the City Council.

Common Interest Developments (CID), as proposed here, are subject to compliance with the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (California Civil Code sections 4000 et seq.).

This Act is intended to provide owners with a system of self-government and dispute resolution through a homeowner’s association. The California Department of Real Estate will review the proposed CID's legal framework to ensure compliance with the Subdivided Lands Law as part of the public report application process, before units are offered for sale to the public.

FINDINGS
The following findings are required by the Subdivision Map Act for approval of a tentative subdivision map:

1. The project is consistent with the General Plan as specified in Government Code Section 65451.

The General Plan directs the City to use the Plan Area Statements (PAS), Community Plans, and Area Plans to guide land-use policies and address land-use issues. The project site is designated by the General Plan as a Tourist Center, which permits the most intensive land uses, including major commercial/visitor centers and mixed-use residential.

The project site is also located in the Tourist Core Area Plan Tourist Center District, where tourist accommodation (condo-hotel) is encouraged and allowed by right.

Thus, the proposed Tentative Map to subdivide units into condo-hotel is consistent with the General Plan and the Tourist Core Area Plan Specific Plan adopted by the City Council.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The Tourist Core Tourist Center District is zoned for higher-density tourist accommodation, with a maximum of 40 units per acre. The proposed project includes 506
City Council Agenda Report- April 21, 2026 Page 3
60 units on 1.59 acres, which equates to 37units per acre. The proposed design and improvements were also found to be consistent with the development and design standards of the Tourist Core Area Plan Specific Plan when the Planning Commission approved the project on November 10, 2016.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development. The project site was previously developed with tourist accommodation uses built in the 1960s and 1970s that were subsequently demolished as part of the Redevelopment Project 3. The site is also surrounded by highly intensive urban uses developed as a major commercial/visitor center with excess land coverage. The site is also close to employment centers, recreational opportunities, transit, pedestrian infrastructure, and public services.

The project site has also been verified by TRPA as suitable for development (i.e., Land Capability District Class 7), and existing utilities (e.g., sewer, water, and electricity) are located adjacent to the property.

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The Tourist Core Tourist Center District is zoned for higher-density tourist accommodation at 40 units per acre. As described above, the proposed subdivision would result in 60 units, or 37 units per acre.

5. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

On November 10, 2016, the Planning Commission made the finding that the Zalanta Phase 2 was consistent with the original 2007 project approval, as analyzed in the EIR/EIS for Redevelopment Project #3 and the subsequent 2007 Second Addendum, and thus, additional environmental analysis is not required for the Phase 2 Project.

6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

Given compliance with all City, County, State, TRPA, and Federal regulations, the project is unlikely to cause public health problems. The project must install water-quality best management practices to treat runoff, mitigate air-quality impacts, install pedestrian and street improvements and lighting consistently with the City Public Improvement and Engineering Standards, install lighting, be built to meet all fire and defensible space standards, and meet the conditions of approval outlined in Major Design Review Permit #16-177.

7. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

The Tentative Map submitted by the applicant indicates that public utility easements exist on the site, including a snow storage easement in favor of the City of South Lake Tahoe and an emergency access easement. The approved Zalanta Phase 2 Project was designed not to interfere with the recorded easements.
507
City Council Agenda Report- April 21, 2026 Page 4
Environmental Analysis:

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
On November 10, 2016, the Planning Commission made the finding that the Zalanta Phase 2 was consistent with the original 2007 project approval, as analyzed in the certified EIR/EIS for Redevelopment Project #3 and the subsequent certified 2007 Second Addendum, and thus, additional environmental analysis is not required for the Phase 2 Project.

The EIR/EIS and the 2007 Second Addendum concluded that all components of Redevelopment Project 3 would not have a significant effect on the environment when mitigation measures are implemented.

Public Notice:

Notice of this public hearing was mailed to all affected properties within 300 feet of the project area on March 31, 2026, and published in the Tahoe Daily Tribune on April 10, 2026. No comments have been received as of the date of this report.

Financial Implications:

The approval of a Tentative Map does not have any negative financial implications for the City.

Once the project is constructed and the units are operating as hotel-condos, the City will receive tourist occupancy tax for nightly rentals and well as property tax. The operation of the property is also beneficial for the overall economy of the city.

Policy Implications:

The Tentative Map aligns with the City Council's strategic priorities to create an environment that attracts diverse investment in our community and supports existing businesses. The Tentative Map is also consistent with the transportation strategy of locating denser land use near transit to increase ridership opportunities.
508

ZALANTA II RESORT

AT THE VILLAGE
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Project Site
Zalanta II Resort
Target Center
Heavenly Village
Zalanta Phase I
Chateau
NEVADA

CALIFORNIA
ATTACHMENT 02 - LOCATION MAP
Friday Ave
Cedar Ave
Lake Tahoe Blvd
516
Resolution 2026- 006 February 19, 2026 Page 1 of 4
Resolution 2026- 006
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
Planning Commission
February 19, 2026

RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE TENTATIVE

SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE ZALANTA II RESORT AT THE VILLAGE PROJECT, APNS 029-641-004, 029-062-012, 029-062-018, AND 029- 062-020, FILE #TSM25- 002

BACKGROUND
A. On November 10, 2016, the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission adopted Design Review Permit #16-177 for the construction of a 60-unit condohotel project.

B. Jacksonville Hospitality Group Fl LLC has obtained a City Building Permit EXTEN26-0003 for sitework.

C. On November 11, 2025, the City received a Tentative Map and Subdivision Map application from Jacksonville Hospitality Group Fl LLC to subdivide the units into air-space condominiums.

D. On February 19, 2026, the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Tentative Subdivision Map (File #TSM25- 002) for the Zalanta II Resort at the Village.

E. The City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to receive public comments, considered evidence in the record, and deliberated.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission:

1. Finds the Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the City General Plan, the Tourist Core Area Plan, and the City-Wide Design Standards, and meets the findings required by the California Subdivision Map Act. 517
Resolution 2026-006 February 19, 2026 Page 2 of 4

2. Finds that the Tentative Subdivisions Map will not have a significant effect on the environment as disclosed in the EIR/EIS for Redevelopment Project 3 and the subsequent 2007 Second Addendum.

3. Make the following Subdivision Map Act findings pursuant to Government Code Section 66474:
a. Finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan.
b. Finds that the design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan and the Tourist Core Area Plan.
c. Finds that the site is physically suitable for the type of development. d. Finds that the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
e. Finds that the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
f. Finds that the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. Finds that the design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

4. Recommends that the City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map for the Zalanta II Resort at the Village, based on the analysis in the staff report, the findings required by the California Subdivision Map Act, and subject to the following conditions of approval:
a. The initial life of the Tentative Subdivision Map is 24 months unless otherwise extended as described in Government Code section 66452.6.
b. The owner may file multiple Final Subdivision Maps prior to the expiration of the Tentative Subdivision Map as long as:
i. The subdivider gives notice to the City of its intent to do so; and ii. After filing the Tentative Subdivision Map, the subdivider and City concur in the filing of multiple Final Maps (Government Code section 66456.1.)
518
Resolution 2026-006 February 19, 2026 Page 3 of 4
c. The Final Map shall include all information and statements required by Article 4 of the Subdivision Map Act.
d. The Final Map shall be prepared by or under the direction of a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor. It shall conform to the provisions in the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code section 66434.
e. The City Council shall approve the Final Subdivision Map per the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code section 66440.
f. If Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions is recorded with the Department of Real Estate, the applicant shall provide a copy of such document to the City Planning Division.
g. Any amendment or modification to said document shall also be provided to the City Planning Division.
h. The Final Subdivision Map shall be in substantial compliance with Major Design Review #16-177 and the adopted conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A.
i. The Final Subdivision Map shall include the following overflight notification language:
i. “ The parcel may be subject to annoyances and inconveniences associated with the flight of aircraft to, from, and around the Lake Tahoe Airport per the Lake Tahoe Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan dated August 2019.”
ii. “ The Lake Tahoe Land Use Compatibility Plan and City of South Lake Tahoe Ordinance 2020-1142 identify a Lake Tahoe Airport Influence Area. Properties within this area are routinely subject to overflights by aircraft using this military airport and, as a result, residents may experience inconvenience, annoyance, or discomfort arising from the noise of such operations. State law Public Resources Code section 21670 et seq.) supports the importance of military airports in protecting the public interest of the people of the United States and the state of California.

Residents of property near such airports should therefore be prepared to accept the inconvenience, annoyance, or discomfort from normal aircraft operations. Residents should also be aware that aircraft activity may increase in the future in response to federal military needs. Any subsequent deed conveying this 519
Resolution 2026-006 February 19, 2026 Page 4 of 4
parcel or subdivision thereof shall contain a statement in substantially this form.”
j. The Final Subdivision Map shall include easements and dedications, and shall cite cross-access agreements and recorded deed restrictions to assure legal access to all parcels, including condominium parcels, to the public right-of-way, as required by the Subdivision Map Act and as directed and approved by the City.
k. A Tentative Subdivision Map recommendation of approval by the Planning Commission does not constitute Final Subdivision Map approval.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission at a meeting on February 19, 2026, by the following vote:

Yes: Lucksinger, Feiger, Imhoff, Williams, Gonzalez
Date:_________
Julia Lucksinger, Chair
Attest:

Yvette Miranda, Administrative Clerk II
The presence of an electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.

Julia E Lucksinger ( Mar 3, 2026 07:46:34 PST)
Mar 3, 2026
520
Resolution 2026-006_Zalanta II Resort at the
Village Tentative Map
Final Audit Report 2026- 03-03
Created: 2026- 02-21
By: Yvette Miranda ( ymiranda@cityofslt. gov)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAc94E4TZ9axJ_ q1x8QSfbrdnxImP_ ULeZ Resolution 2026-006_Zalanta II Resort at the Village Tentative Map" History
Document created by Yvette Miranda ([email protected]) 2026- 02- 21 - 0:48:48 AM GMT
Document e-signed by Yvette Miranda ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2026- 02-21 - 0:49:38 AM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to jlucksinger@cityofslt. us for signature 2026- 02- 21 - 0:49:39 AM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2026- 03- 03 - 3:46:07 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Julia E Lucksinger 2026- 03- 03 - 3:46:32 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Julia E Lucksinger ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2026- 03-03 - 3:46:34 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2026- 03- 03 - 3:46:34 PM GMT
521

EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT
AREA: 3,885 SF

PARCEL A
AREA: 1.59 ACRES (69,407 SF)
SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT AREA: 2,657 SF
SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT AREA: 2,058 SF
N 14°39'34" E 79.6'
N 14°39'34" E 102.8'
S75°20'26"E 102.92'
S14°39'34"W

33.79'
S14°39'34"W

25.00'

25.8'

25.8'

25.8' 20.8'

25.8'

UTILITY EASEMENT
AREA: 3,455 SF

GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40

JACKSONVILLE HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC
4720 SALISBURY RD
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256
904-201-9645
ALL PROPOSED STRUCTURES WILL HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS.

LOCATION

PROJECT CALIFORNIA NEVADA
KINGS
BEACH
TAHOE

KEYS SOUTH
LAKE
TAHOE
PLACER CO.

EL DORADO CO.

DOUGLAS CO.

WASHOE CO.

CARSON CITY
LAKE
TAHOE

INCLINE

VILLAGE
50 50 EMERALD

BAY MEEKS
BAY McKINNEY
BAY
TAHOE
CITY
89 89

CALIFORNIA NEVADA
431
207
50 267
50 CARSON CITY
28 28

ELKS POINT
ROAD
UTILITY CONTACT INFORMATION:

A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER SECTION 27, T.13N., R.18E.,
M.D.B.& M.

1. DEVELOPMENT OF 60 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, ONE COMMERCIAL, COMMON AREA, ACCESS DRIVE, PARKING, BMPS AND LANDSCAPING.

2. TOTAL AREA: 1.28 ACRES

3. THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS LOCATED ENTIRELY IN ZONE "X" PURSUANT TO FLOOD RATE INSURANCE MAP 06017C0380F DATED APRIL 13, 2012.

4. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TOURIST CORE AREA PLAN DISTRICT TOURIST CENTER (TSC-C).

5. THIS SUBDIVISION MAY BE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND COVENENTS PER THE FOLLOWING RECORDED DOCUMENTS:
2007-0018417 E.O.C.O.R. 2017-0012172 E.O.C.O.R.
2008-005448 E.O.C.O.R. 2017-0015815 E.O.C.O.R.
2008-005449 E.O.C.O.R. 2017-0015816 E.O.C.O.R.
2016-0051511 E.O.C.O.R. 2017-0015899 E.O.C.O.R.
2017-0003702 E.O.C.O.R.

THIS TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES, FOR 60 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE

LOCATION, WIDTH, TYPE AND RECORDING INFORMATION OF ALL RECORDED EASEMENTS LISTED IN THE PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, ORDER NUMBER 3409-7272570, DATED OCTOBER 17, 2025. ALL PROPOSED EASEMENTS, EXISTING EASEMENTS AND EASEMENTS TO BE ABANDONED ARE IDENTIFIED.

OCTOBER 2025

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SHEET 1 OF 1

JACKSONVILLE HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC

ZALANTA II RESORT AT THE VILLAGE

FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES

TENTATIVE MAP

ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVEYING
Brunner-Hagen, Inc . 8175 S. Virginia Street #850
PMB 397
Reno, NV 89511
DAVID L. HAGEN, LS 8631 DATE
REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/2025

A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE

SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER
SECTION 27, T.13N., R.18E., M.D.B.& M.

THE BASIS OF ELEVATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS

ESTABLISHED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL
DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) USING USGS INFORMATION.

THE BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE FINAL MAP FOR

ZALANTA RESORT AT THE VILLAGE, LLC, RECORDED IN
BOOK "J" OF MAPS AT PAGE 149, SEPTEMBER 12, 2016.
(R1) THE FINAL MAP FOR ZALANTA RESORT AT THE
RECORDED IN BOOK "J" OF MAPS AT PAGE 149,
SEPTEMBER 12, 2016, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF EL
DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA..
(R2) LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT
2017-0010056, MARCH 13, 2017, OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

ZALANTA II - APNS:
029-062-012
029-062-018
029-062-020
029-062-033
029-641-004
029-060-004

JACKSONVILLE HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC
4720 SALISBURY RD
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256
904-201-9645
Line Table
Line #
L1
L2
L3
L5
L7
L10
L12
L13
L15
L17
L20
L25
L26
L27
L28
Length

21.98'

31.33'

3.62'

18.26'

10.23'

11.84'

16.00'

11.84'

10.23'

17.95'

3.62'

31.33'

24.02'

21.85'

10.23'
Direction
S14° 01' 30"W
S49° 13' 20"W
S86° 46' 50"W
N53° 41' 08"W
N41° 36' 59"W
N75° 46' 23"W
S14° 13' 37"W
S75° 46' 23"E
S41° 36' 59"E
S53° 41' 08"E
N86° 46' 50"E
N49° 13' 20"E
N14° 38' 10"E
N75° 58' 30"W
S41° 36' 59"E
Curve Table
Curve #
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
Length

34.09'

38.03'

10.95'

40.54'

40.54'

31.00'

14.32'

49.38'

49.38'

44.58'

11.27'

14.32'
Radius

52.00'

52.00'

52.00'

68.00'

68.00'

52.00'

68.00'

68.00'

68.00'

68.00'

22.00'

68.00'
Delta
037°33'30"
041°54'27"
012°04'09"
034°09'24"
034°09'24"
034°09'24"
012°04'09"
041°36'34"
041°36'34"
037°33'30"
029°20'48"
012°04'09"
522
Resolution 2026-XX April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026-XX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 21, 2026

APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE ZALANTA II RESORT AT THE VILLAGE PROJECT, APNs 029-641-004, 029-062- 012, 029-062-018, and 029-062-020, 029-062-033, and 029-060-004, File #TSM25-002

BACKGROUND
A. On November 10, 2016, the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission adopted Design Review Permit #16-177 for the construction of a 60-unit condohotel project.

B. Jacksonville Hospitality Group Fl LLC has obtained a City Building Permit #EXTEN26-0003 for sitework.

C. On November 11, 2025, the City received a Tentative Subdivision Map application from Jacksonville Hospitality Group FL LLC to subdivide the proposed units into airspace condominiums.

D. On February 19, 2026, the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Tentative Subdivision Map (File #TSM25- 002) for the Zalanta II Resort at the Village.

E. On February 4, 2026, a public notice was mailed to all affected properties within 300 feet of the project area, providing notice of the Planning Commission public hearing date, time, and location. On February 6, 2026, a notice of the Planning Commission meeting was published in the Tahoe Daily Tribune.

F. The City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to receive public comments, considered evidence in the record, deliberated, and passed a motion to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2026-006, recommending that the City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map for Subdivision II Resort at the Village Project.
523
Resolution 2026-XX April 21, 2026 Page 2
G. On March 31, 2026, a public notice was mailed to all affected properties within 300 feet of the project area, providing notice of the City Council public hearing date, time, and location. On April 10, 2026, a notice of the City Council meeting was published in the Tahoe Daily Tribune.

H. On April 21, 2026, the City of South Lake City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Tentative Subdivision Map (File #TSM25-002) for the Zalanta II Resort at the Village.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of South Lake City Council:

1. Finds the Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the City General Plan, the Tourist Core Area Plan, and the City-Wide Design Standards, and meets the findings required by the California Subdivision Map Act.

2. Finds that the Tentative Subdivisions Map will not have a significant effect on the environment as disclosed in the EIR/EIS for Redevelopment Project 3 and the subsequent 2007 Second Addendum.

3. Make the following Subdivision Map Act findings pursuant to Government Code Section 66474:
a. Finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan.
b. Finds that the design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan and the Tourist Core Area Plan.
c. Finds that the site is physically suitable for the type of development. d. Finds that the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
e. Finds that the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
f. Finds that the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. Finds that the design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
524
Resolution 2026-XX April 21, 2026 Page 3

4. Approve the Tentative Subdivision Map for the Zalanta II Resort at the Village, based on the analysis in the staff report, the findings required by the California Subdivision Map Act, and subject to the following conditions of approval:
a. The initial life of the Tentative Subdivision Map is 24 months unless otherwise extended as described in Government Code section 66452.6.
b. Submit a Final Subdivision Map Application to the Public Works Department.
c. The owner may file multiple Final Subdivision Maps prior to the expiration of the Tentative Subdivision Map, as long as:
i. The subdivider gives notice to the City of its intent to do so; and ii. After filing the Tentative Subdivision Map, the subdivider and City concur in the filing of multiple Final Maps (Government Code section 66456.1.)
d. The Final Map shall include all information and statements required by Article 4 of the Subdivision Map Act.
e. The Final Map shall be prepared by or under the direction of a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor. It shall conform to the provisions in the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code section 66434.
f. If a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions is recorded with the Department of Real Estate, the applicant shall provide a copy of such document to the City Planning Division.
g. Any amendment or modification to a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions shall also be provided to the City Planning Division.
h. The Final Subdivision Map shall be in compliance with Major Design Review #16-177 and the adopted conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A.
i. The Final Subdivision Map shall include the following overflight notification language:
i. “The parcel may be subject to annoyances and inconveniences associated with the flight of aircraft to, from, and around the Lake Tahoe Airport per the Lake Tahoe Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan dated August 2019.”
525
Resolution 2026-XX April 21, 2026 Page 4
ii. “The Lake Tahoe Land Use Compatibility Plan and City of South Lake Tahoe Ordinance 2020-1142 identify a Lake Tahoe Airport Influence Area. Properties within this area are routinely subject to overflights by aircraft using this military airport and, as a result, residents may experience inconvenience, annoyance, or discomfort arising from the noise of such operations. State law (Public Resources Code section 21670 et seq.) supports the importance of military airports in protecting the public interest of the people of the United States and the state of California.

Residents of property near such airports should therefore be prepared to accept the inconvenience, annoyance, or discomfort from normal aircraft operations. Residents should also be aware that aircraft activity may increase in the future in response to federal military needs. Any subsequent deed conveying this parcel or subdivision thereof shall contain a statement in substantially this form.”
j. The Final Subdivision Map shall include easements and dedications, and shall cite cross-access agreements and recorded deed restrictions to assure legal access to all parcels, including condominium parcels, to the public right-of-way, as required by the Subdivision Map Act and as directed and approved by the City.
k. Approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map does not constitute Final Subdivision Map approval.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council at a meeting on April 21, 2026, by the following vote:

Yes
No
Absent
Abstain
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
526
Resolution 2026-XX April 21, 2026 Page 5
The presence of an electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
527
EXHIBIT 1
528
8CD09 City Council April 21 2026 Meeting - Page 2 of 2
529
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Agenda Item #:15
Agenda Item: 2025-2026 Master Fee Schedule
Executive Summary: Per the discussion held on March 24, 2026, the proposed updates to the 2025- 2026 Master Fee Schedule incorporate the comprehensive user fee study conducted in 2025. The updates also include Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments, reflecting the City's ongoing efforts to promote full cost recovery where applicable. The Master Fee Schedule has been thoroughly reviewed by departments and Finance staff to ensure it appropriately balances the City's cost recovery objectives, current market conditions, and broader policy considerations. The City Council will consider formal adoption of the 2025–2026 Master Fee Schedule at this meeting or at a subsequent meeting if further revisions are requested.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution adopting the Annual Master Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services as presented; or provide direction to staff to modify the schedule and return at a subsequent meeting with a revised resolution for adoption.

Responsible Staff Member: Akemi Nishimura, Accountant I Reviewed and Approved By: Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff_Report_2526_Master_Fee_Schedule.docx
02-Master Fee Schedule 25_26 (Red-Lined).pdf
03-Strengthening Financial Position Feb 2013.pdf
04-Notice of Public Hearing-Master Fee Schedule_04.03.26.pdf 05-Resolution - Master Fee Schedule 25-26.docx
06-Master Fee Schedule 2526 (Exh. A to Reso.).pdf
07-SLT User Fee Report FINAL.pdf
530
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 1 of 5
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Title: 2025-2026 Master Fee Schedule (Public Hearing)
Location: Finance Department
Responsible Staff Member: Akemi Nishimura, Accountant I, (530) 542-6061; Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance, (530) 542-7431
Background:

User fees in California are required to conform to the California Constitution (including Proposition 26) and statutory requirements such as Government Code Sections 66014 through 66018.5. Under Proposition 26, fees imposed for specific services, reasonable regulatory costs, licenses and permits, or for entrance to or use of City property are generally excluded from the definition of a "tax," as outlined in Article XIIIC, Section 1(e). Fees for the use of City property, such as campground fees, fall under this exception and are not restricted to cost recovery, allowing the City to charge market-based rates.

On March 10, 2026, the City Council received a presentation of the Draft Comprehensive User Fee Study prepared by Government Consulting Partners (GCP). The purpose of the study was to align user fees with the actual cost of providing services, improve transparency, ensure compliance with Proposition 26 and Government Code Section 66014, and reduce unintended General Fund subsidies where appropriate.

The study evaluated the full cost of service across departments, including direct staff time, fully burdened labor rates, overhead allocation, operating costs, and current cost recovery levels.

Before providing policy direction on potential fee adjustments, the Council requested additional information regarding the City's financial condition. As a result, updates to the Master Fee Schedule were scheduled to return following the FY 2026 Mid-Year Budget Review and Five-Year Financial Plan Update, along with the requested policy direction.

On March 24, 2026, with the additional financial context provided by the FY 2026 Mid-Year Budget Review and Five-Year Financial Plan Update, Council directed staff to set cost recovery levels as recommended by GCP, except:

1. Fingerprinting fees: recover only the Department of Justice cost.

2. Appeals: set at full-cost recovery and due at filing; if appellants prevail (the decision is reversed or materially modified in their favor), the full fee will be refunded.

3. Continued General Fund subsidy levels for Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

4. Continued General Fund subsidy levels for recreation and other community-benefit programs.

Recommendations for reduced building permit fees for smaller homes, small businesses, multifamily rental housing, and deed-restricted housing will be brought forward at a later date. 531
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 5
Issue and Discussion:

The attached Master Fee Schedule reflects the fee adjustments directed by the City Council on March 24, 2026. Certain fees were excluded from the User Fee Study because they are set by contract or require market analysis beyond the scope of the RFP. These fees remain included in the Master Fee Schedule presented for Council review and approval. Each department reviewed its respective fee schedule as adjusted through the User Fee Study and further evaluated whether the adjusted fees could reasonably be increased by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the upcoming fee schedule cycle.

Consistent with GCP's recommendation, staff utilized the San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward Urban All Items Index (formerly the San Francisco–Oakland–San Jose Urban All Items Index). This index has historically been applied to adjust fees that are not constrained by local market forces or by state or local laws and ordinances. The CPI increase applicable for 2025-2026 is 3.04%. Fees excluded from this adjustment include those governed by contractual agreements or limited by State or City Code, as noted in the Areas of Exception section below.

This update supports the City's Financial Policies: Strengthening Financial Position (adopted in 2013), which call for regular review of user fees to promote fiscal sustainability and minimize General Fund subsidies where appropriate. The policy states:

The City provides certain services to its residents and businesses that are funded in whole or in part by fees that are intended to cover all or a portion of the cost of providing such services. To the extent User Fees do not cover the entire cost of providing such services, the General Fund subsidizes the additional expense. Careful examination of User Fees shall enhance the stability of the General Fund.
…fees shall be adjusted by no less than the amount of the annual change in the Consumer Price Index.

As directed by the City Council at its March 24, 2026 meeting, the changes have been fully incorporated into the Master Fee Schedule presented with this agenda item. Accordingly, the item includes a resolution for Council consideration to adopt the 2025-2026 Master Fee Schedule at this meeting. If the City Council directs modifications to any fees, staff will return at a subsequent meeting with a revised Master Fee Schedule reflecting those changes prior to implementation.

AREAS OF EXCEPTION TO THE PROPOSED 3.04% INCREASE AND OTHER CHANGES Recreation Services: Recreation Facility Rental fees are market-based, and the Recreation Program fees are tied to community benefit and subsidy level (level of cost recovery). Staff applied the CPI increase selectively, accepting it for programs and rentals below market or cost recovery levels.

Facility Rentals, Facility Day Use offerings, and programs associated with the former Recreation Complex have been removed following its closure on April 4, 2026. In addition to the fee schedule adopted on November 4, 2025, staff proposed supplemental fees for the new Recreation and Aquatic Center to provide expanded options for families and youth organizations. Ice Arena fees will remain unchanged at this time.

Development Services-Building: Staff accepts all applicable CPI increases except for fees increased by the User Fee Study. Permit Technology Fee has been increased in coordination with the Finance Department. Residential Suppression System fees have been renamed as Residential Fire 532
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 3 of 5
Sprinkler fee and are now assessed based on construction valuation to reflect current service delivery practices. Re-check Fee for fourth and subsequent re-inspections has been introduced at a higher rate than the standard re-inspection fee to discourage repeat inspection requests without necessary corrections. Notice of Violation (City Code 6.55.550) has been added for clarity, as it was previously captured under other code violations in the Police Department section.

Development Services-Housing: Staff accepts all applicable CPI increases for the current year.

Development Services-Planning: In addition to the fee adjustments recommended to achieve full cost recovery, staff applied most CPI increases for the current year, except for the Inclusionary Housing Requirement, which is not subject to CPI adjustment pursuant to Ordinance 2023-1180.

Inclusionary Housing Plan Check Process fee has been added to recover staff costs associated with reviewing these plans.

Residential Permit Processing has been renamed as Allocation Application Processing for clarity.

Negative Declaration Review and Negative Declaration Preparation fees have been updated from a flat rate to the actual specialist cost plus a 25% administrative fee. Permit Technology Fee has been added to recover the cost of maintaining cloud-based systems. Special Plan Inspections fee has been introduced to reflect demand for services outside regular business hours, including evenings and weekends.

Plan Amendment Deposit has been increased from $8,855 to $10,000 in accordance with the User Fee Study, and a $10,000 deposit has also been added for Annexation reviews. Mobile Vending - New Vendor Permit and Renewal Permit have been removed as these are included within the Location Permit. Public Murals review continues to have no fee pursuant to Resolution 2022-104.

Public Works: Staff applied all CPI increases for the current year except for Transportation Permit fees, which are set by the State.

Consistent with the User Fee Study, the fee structure for Large Multi-Family Residential Public Works plan reviews (7 or more units) has been updated from a fixed amount to an hourly rate, and Grading fees have been streamlined. To accommodate the need for outsourced plan review services, Third-Party Plan Review has been added. Technology Fee is also introduced to recover the cost of maintaining cloud-based systems.

Fire Department: Staff applied all applicable CPI increases for 2025–2026. In accordance with the User Fee Study, redundant or obsolete fees have been removed to simplify the fee schedule. Many fees also move away from the hourly rate and offer a rate per incident as originally intended.

Ceremonial/Special Permit, Tree Removal Permit, Misc. Event Standby, and Basic Fire Inspection hourly rate after 4 hours have been added to reflect the service demand. Fire Administrative Processing fee has also been introduced to recover the administrative staff cost.

Police Department: Per Res 2025-030, Parking Citation for Illegal Parking in an Electric Vehicle Charging Space (City Code 4.25.435) is added to the Master Fee Schedule. Per Resolution 2025- 054, Qualified Vacation Home Rentals are no longer permitted and removed from the schedule. Per Resolution 2025-093, Public Safety Mitigation Fees are eliminated beginning with the 2026 fee cycle. A Repossession Fee is also added in compliance with Government Code Section 41612.

An increase in the Shared Mobility Device fee is recommended to achieve full cost recovery, pending adoption of amendments to Ordinance 2020-1140. In conjunction with this adjustment, penalties of $100 each for Shared Mobility Device Operator Violations and Shared Mobility Device Rider Violations are proposed.
533
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 4 of 5
Airport: Staff applied all applicable CPI increases for 2025–2026 except for GA Ramp Fee for A/C under 5,000 lbs, Fuel Flowage Fee, and Hangars. No increase is proposed for those fees as they are already comparable to fair market rates.
534
Council Agenda Report April 21, 2026 Page 5 of 5
Gratuitous Transportation has been removed, and Advertising "Paper" Pick‑Up Ads has been replaced with Advertising Digital to reflect current market demand. Special Event Fee (Celebrity Golf, A/C under 5,000 exempt) has been added to recover the cost of air traffic control services required during major events such as the Celebrity Golf tournament.

City Clerk: Staff proposes opting out of the CPI increase for 2025–2026. Notary Service fees are set by California Government Code Section 8211. Public Property Use Fee for filming has been replaced with four new fees that more accurately reflect the services provided.

Finance: The passage of Measure B on June 5, 2012 precludes any CPI changes to the tax rate per $1,000 of gross receipts and sets the maximum annual tax of $20,000; therefore, no changes to the Business and Professions Tax Rates are proposed. Based on the user fee study, several fees are adjusted to 100% cost recovery except Return Check (NSF) Processing, which is set by California Civil Code 1719. Staff proposes opting out of the CPI increase for 2025–2026.

Financial Implications:

Fees that are less than full cost recovery will be required to be subsidized by other General Fund revenues.

Environmental Considerations:

This is not a "project" subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) (organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

Policy Implications:

Implementation of the recommended fees for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 is consistent with the City's adopted Financial Policies of cost recovery for City provided services where applicable. 535
Resident Non-Resident
Gym Rentals
Full (2 Courts) hourly $250 n/a
1/2 Gym (1 Court) hourly $125 n/a
1/4 (1/2 Court) hourly $65 n/a
Stage Rental Fee each $150 n/a
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Facility Rental Setup Fee per hour per staff $48 n/a
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500 Maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum n/a Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum n/a Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due n/a
Meeting Room Rentals
Rental per hour $25 n/a
Non Fee Partner/Affiliate Use No Charge No Charge n/a
Recognized Local Youth Sport Organizations May Have Free Use of Meeting Rooms in the Recreation & Aquatics Center No Charge No Charge n/a Youth Organization Meetings hourly $15 n/a
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Senior Services Meetings No Charge No Charge n/a
Community Room Rentals
Rental hourly $55 n/a
Stage Rental Fee each $150 n/a
Recognized Local Youth Sport Organizations May Have Free Use of Meeting Rooms in the Recreation & Aquatics Center No Charge No Charge n/a Youth Organization Meetings hourly $15 n/a
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Senior Services Meetings No Charge No Charge n/a
Facility Rental Setup Fee per hour per staff $48 n/a
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500 Maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum n/a Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum n/a Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due n/a
Commercial Kitchen Rental
Commercial Kitchen Rental hourly $50 n/a
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Facility Rental Setup Fee per hour per staff $48 n/a
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500 Maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum n/a Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum n/a Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center
Adopted Fee 11/4/2026 Fee Description Unit

536
Resident Non-Resident
Commercial Kitchen Rental (Cont.)
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due n/a
Dance/Fitness Room Rental
Rental hourly $55 n/a
Stage Rental Fee each $150 n/a
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Senior Services Meetings No Charge No Charge n/a
Facility Rental Setup Fee per hour per staff $48 n/a
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500 Maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum n/a Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum n/a Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due n/a
Event Space Rentals
Event Space Weekday Mon-Thurs $/hr. $350 n/a
Event Space Weekend Fri -Sun $/hr. $450 n/a
Event Space After Hours per hour $100 n/a
Stage Rental Fee each $150 n/a
Audio Video Ad On each $150 n/a
Event Space Facility Rental Setup Fee per hour (2 hour minimum) $48 n/a Ceremony Chair Package $7-$9 per chair comps $8 per chair n/a Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500 Maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum n/a Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum n/a Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due n/a
Pool Rental
Swimming Pool Rental Rate hourly $85 n/a
Lap Pool Rental (Full) hourly $85 n/a
Lap Pool Rental (1/2 pool) hourly $45 n/a
Lap Lane Rental (1 Lane) hourly $15 n/a
Play Pool Rental hourly $95 n/a
Stage Rental Fee each $150 n/a
Lifeguard Hourly Rate (Rental) hourly actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Facility Rental Setup Fee per hour per staff $48 n/a
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500 Maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum n/a Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee 11/4/2026

537
Resident Non-Resident
Pool Rental (Cont.)
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum n/a Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due n/a
Party Room
Rental Weekday Mon-Thurs $/hr. $40 n/a
Rental Weekend Fri -Sun $/hr. $50 n/a
Recognized Local Youth Sport Organizations May Have Free Use of Meeting Rooms in the Recreation & Aquatics Center No Charge No Charge n/a Youth Organization Meetings hourly $15 n/a
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Facility Rental Setup Fee per hour per staff $48 n/a
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500 Maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum n/a Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum n/a Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due n/a
Party Packages
Mini Mountain Movers Party Package session rental $225 n/a Batting Cages 2-hour party $300 n/a
Rockwall 1-hour party $200 n/a
Obstacle Course Pool Add On per event $75 n/a
Pool Party Package session rental $200 n/a
Aquatics
Obstacle Course per participant $5 plus facility drop in fee n/a
Lifeguard Certification Course per participant $235 n/a Water Safety Instructor Certification Course per participant $299 n/a Junior Lifeguards per participant per 4-week session $200 n/a Mini Lifeguards per participant per 4-week session $185 n/a Swim Team per participant per month/session $120 n/a
Development Swim Team per participant per month/session $105 n/a Aquatics Special Class (Ex Log Rolling) per participant per class $7 n/a Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Classess 30 minutes each $10 n/a Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Classess 60 minutes each $20 n/a Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Classess 90 minutes each $30 n/a Locker Rental per month $20 n/a
Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee 11/4/2026

538
Resident Non-Resident
Swimming Programs
H2O Exercise: Adult 18-54 years each $8 $10
H2O Exercise: Senior or Permanent Disability each $6 $8 H2O Exercise: Adult 18-54 years - 10 Use Pass each $60 $75 H2O Exercise: Senior or Perm Disability - 10 Use Pass each $50 $65 H2O Exercise: Individual Annual Pass each $295 $369
Swimming Lessons (Group) 8 Class Session each $50 n/a
Swimming Lessons (Group) 6 Class Session each $40 n/a
Swimming Lessons (Group) 4 Class Session each $30 n/a
Private Lessons (25 minutes) 1 Student each $33 n/a
Private Lessons (25 minutes) 2 Students each $45 n/a
Swimming Programs (Cont.)
Private Lessons (25 minutes) 3 Students each $55 n/a
Master Swim Drop In each $10 $12
Master Swim Session 10 Use Punch Card each $70 $85
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Facility Day Use: Includes Gym, Natatorium, Exercise Room, Walking Track Adult: 18-54 Years each $10 $15
Youth: 18 Years and Under each $8 $12
Senior 55 Years and Up or Permanent Disability each $8 $12 Public Shower Adult/Discount for Senior, Disabled, and Youth each $3/$2 n/a Daily Day Rate for Medi-Cal, WIC , and Veteran Participants Adult: 18 and Over each $3 n/a
Youth: 18 Years and Under each $2 n/a
Facility Multi-Use Day Passes: Includes Gym, Natatorium, Exercise Room, Walking Track Adult - 10 use punch card each $80 $100
Adult - Monthly each $65 $81
Adult - 90 Day (City Employees Only) each $45 n/a
Senior or Permanent Disability -10 use punch card each $65 $81 Senior or Permanent Disability - Monthly each $50 $63
Children 3 years and Under Are Free with a Paying Adult for Recreation Drop in only each Youth - 10 use punch card each $65 $81
Youth Monthly each $50 $63
Couple Annual Pass each $690 $863
Individual Annual Pass each $480 $600
Youth Annual Pass each $300 $375
Youth Annual Pass for GPA of 3.5 or higher (Resident Only - Ages 14-17) each $150 n/a Senior Annual Pass each $300 $375
10% off Annual pass is purchased between January 1, 2026 - March 31, 2026 n/a Family Annual Pass (2 adults + 2 children): Includes 20% discount on party packages and access to special member days each $825 $1,031
Adopted Fee 11/4/2026
10% off annual pass is purchased between 1/1/2026 -
3/31/2026
Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit

539
Resident Non-Resident
Facility Multi-Use Day Passes: Includes Gym, Natatorium, Exercise Room, Walking Track (Cont.) Family Annual Pass (1 adult + 1 child): Includes 20% discount on party packages and access to special member days each $560 $700
Family Annual Pass - Each Additional Adult each additional adult $345 $431 Family Annual Pass - Each Additional Senior or Child each additional senior or child $150 $188 Administrative Fee for replacement of annual passes only each $10 n/a Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount n/a Recreation Add Ons
Batting Cages per participant $5 plus facility drop in
fee n/a
Batting Cages - 10 punch card each $100 includes drop in fee n/a
Rockwall per participant $5 plus facility drop in
fee n/a
Rockwall - 10 punch card each $100 includes drop in
fee n/a
Golf Simulator hourly $50 n/a
Rockwall hourly $150 n/a
Rec Center Special Events
Puzzle Event per team $40 n/a
Family Dance per participant (adults and children
age 2 and older)
$15 n/a
Family Dance (Childred Under 2 Years Old) No Charge No Charge n/a Gym Sports Event per team $40 n/a
Pickleball Tournament per team $75 n/a
Family Game Night Part of Season Pass No Extra Charge n/a Pool Special Events per participant $15 n/a
Pickleball Mixer per participant $25 n/a
Adult Programs
Adult Volleyball League Team per season participant $400 n/a Adult Volleyball League Individual per season participant $66 n/a Adult Basketball League Team per season participant $550 n/a Adult Basketball League Individual per season participant $75 n/a Pickleball Clinic Adults per participant per session $30 n/a Pickleball Clinic Youth per participant per session $25 n/a Senior Games per participant per event $10 n/a
Personal Training per participant per hour $60 $75
Adult Cornhole League Individual per season participant $50 n/a Adult Fitness Classes 30 minutes each $10 $12
Adult Fitness Classes 60 minutes each $15 $18
Adult Fitness Classes 90 minutes each $20 $25
Late Payment Registration for league play 10% increase to base fee 10% increase to base fee n/a
Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee 11/4/2026

540
Resident Non-Resident
Youth and Teens
Parents Night Out per participant $40 n/a
Kid's Summer Day Camp each $40 $50
Kid's Summer Day Camp (Weekly Fee) each $150 $188
Kid's Summer Day Camp Multi-Child Discount 10% off base rate 10% off base rate n/a Youth Basketball League per season participant $65 n/a
Youth Flag Football League per season participant $95 n/a Youth Street Hockey per season participant $70 n/a
After School Enrichment Program per season participant $120 n/a Tiny Tots Sports League per season participant $60 n/a
Youth Volleyball League per season participant $75 n/a
Youth Soccer League per season participant $65 n/a
Multi Child Discount 10% off base fee 10% discount n/a
Late Payment Registration for league play 10% increase to base fee 10% increase to base fee n/a
Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit Adopted Fee 11/4/2026

541
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%

FACILITY RENTALS
Building Rental:

Gymnasium hourly $71
Meeting Rooms, Recreation Complex hourly $39
Kitchen, Recreation Complex hourly $33
Senior Center Large Multi-Purpose Room hourly $64 n/a n/a $0 $64 Senior Center, Conference Room hourly $46 n/a n/a $0 $46 Senior Center, Arts & Crafts Room hourly $46 n/a n/a $0 $46 Public Shower Adult/discount for senior, disabled, youth each $3/$2 Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount Recognized Local Youth Sport Organizations May Have Free Use of Meeting Rooms in the Recreation Complex No Charge No Charge
Facility Rental Setup Fee hourly $43
Single Court Reservation hourly $20
Double Court Reservation hourly $40
Mini Mountain Movers Party Package Session Rental $299
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500 maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due Pool Rental (Per Hour):

Swimming Pool Hourly Rental Rate hourly $84
Lifeguard Hourly Rate (Rental) hourly actual cost at fully burdened rate + overhead
Pool Party Package Session Rental $199
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or $50 Maximum
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due Outdoor Park Facility Rentals:

Alcohol Use Permit, City Sanctioned Public/Private Outdoor Facilities each $66 $0 $66 $2 $68 Bijou Park, Kiwanis Picnic Shelter (4 Hours) hourly $173 $0 $173 $5 $178 Bijou Park, Rotary Picnic Shelter (4 Hours) hourly $173 $0 $173 $5 $178 Recreation Complex Group Picnic Areas (4 Hours) hourly $173 $0 $173 $5 $178 Gazebos and Picnic Areas beyond 4 hour minimum rental hourly $46 $0 $46 $1 $47 Mon-Thur $/hr $222 $0 $222 $7 $229
Fri & Sun $/hr $287 $0 $287 $9 $296
Sat $/hr $349 $0 $349 $11 $360
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due $0 10% of total rental fee due $0 10% of total rental fee due
Public Special Event Park Rentals:

Lakeview Commons or Bijou Community Park Special Event Rental, Attendance up to 500 persons day $1,091 ($291) $800 $0 $800
Lakeview Commons or Bijou Community Park Special Event Rental, Attendance 501- 2,000 1,000 persons
day $1,364 $0 $1,364 $41 $1,405
Lakeview Commons or Bijou Community Park Special Event Rental, Attendance 1,001-2,000 persons day n/a n/a $1,900 $0 $1,900
$ Change $ Change
Recreation Complex Other Parks & Recreation Facilities
Fee Description Unit
Private Rental: Regan Beach West (Per Hour; 2-Hour Minimum)

542
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Public Special Event Park Rentals (Cont.)
Bijou Community Park Lawn Space (up to 100 persons) hourly n/a n/a $50 $0 $50 Bijou Bike Park or Skate Park Rental day $254 $0 $254 $8 $262 Disc Golf Course Rental for Tournaments & Special Events (Bijou Park) day $267 $0 $267 $8 $275 Bijou Park Concession (absent lease agreement) day $299 $0 $299 $0 $299 Bijou Community Park Parking Lot Rental daily $105 $110 $215 $0 $215 Community Playfield Parking Lot Rental daily $105 $110 $215 $0 $215 Facility Rental Setup Fee hourly $43 $5 $48 $0 $48
Special Event Vendor Fee Not to Exceed $125 per event Not to Exceed $125 per event $0 Not to Exceed $125 per event
$0 Not to Exceed $125
per event
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount $0 25% discount $0 25% discount Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due $0 10% of total rental fee due $0 10% of total rental fee due
Facility Rental Setup Fee hourly $43 $5 $48
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 Minimum or $1,500 Maximum Security Deposit and/or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe $500 (Security Deposit) $500 $0 $500 Minimum or $1,000 Maximum $0 $500 Minimum or
$1,000 Maximum
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe $15 (Cancellation Fee) $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum $0 $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum $0 $15 Minimum or$50 Maximum Facility Day Use (Includes Pool, Weight Room, Gym, Ping Pong, Foosball, Traversing Wall):

Adult: 18-54 Year each $6
Youth: 18 Years and Under each $4
Senior 55 Years and Up or Permanent Disability each $5
Daily Day Rate for Medi-Cal, WIC , and Veteran Participants:

Adult: 18 and Over each $3
Youth: 18 Years and Under each $2
Multi-Use Passes:

Adult - 20 Use each $80
Adult - 90 Day each $160
Senior or Permanent Disability - 20 Use each $50
Senior or Permanent Disability - 90 Day each $120
Youth - 20 Use each $45
Youth - 90 Day each $95
Individual Annual Pass each $225
Family Annual Pass (up to 4 people) each $825
Administrative Fee for replacement of annual passes only each $10 Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount Swimming Programs:

H2O Exercise: Adult 18-54 years each $7
H2O Exercise: Senior or Permanent Disability each $6
H2O Exercise: Adult 18-54 years - 10 Use Pass each $50
H2O Exercise: Senior or Perm Disability - 10 Use Pass each $40 H2O Exercise: Individual Annual Pass each $295
Swimming Lessons (Group) 8 Class Session each $49
Swimming Lessons (Group) 6 Class Session each $39
Swimming Lessons (Group) 4 Class Session each $29
$ Change $ Change
Recreation Complex Other Parks & Recreation Facilities (Cont.) Fee Description Unit

543
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Swimming Programs (Cont.)
Private Lessons (25 minutes) 1 Student each $33
Private Lessons (25 minutes) 2 Students each $44
Private Lessons (25 minutes) 3 Students each $55
Children 3 years and Under Are Free with a Paying Adult for Recreation Swim Only each $0 Master Swim Drop In each $10
Master Swim Session 10 Use Punch Card each $60
Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Class 30 minutes each $10
Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Class 60 minutes each $20
Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Class 90 minutes each $30
Pool Special Events per participant $15
Non-Profit Organizations 25% off base rate 25% discount Youth and Teens:

Star Camp Care (pre- and post-camp child care, per hour) each $8 Youth Adventure Camps each Fee based on production costs Kid's Summer Day Camp each $35
Kid's Summer Day Camp (Weekly Fee) each $150
Kid's Summer Day Camp Multi-Child Discount 10% off base fee 10% Youth Basketball League per season participant $65
Youth Flag Football League per season participant $95
After School Enrichment Program per session participant $120 Tiny Tots Sports League per session participant $60
Youth Volleyball League per season participant $75
Youth Soccer League per season participant $65
Parents Night Out per participant $40
Multi Child Discount 10% off base fee 10% discount n/a n/a $0 10% discount Late Payment Registration for Youth League Play 10% increase to base fee 10% Adult Programs:

Adult Volleyball League Team per season per team $400
Adult Volleyball League Individual per season participant $66 Adult Basketball League Team per season per team $550
Adult Basketball League Individual per season participant $75 Adult Cornhole League Individual per season participant $30 Adult Cornhole One Day Event per participant $10
Late Payment Registration for Adult League Play 10% increase to base fee 10% Adult Fitness Classes 30 minutes each $10
Adult Fitness Classes 60 minutes each $15
Adult Fitness Classes 90 minutes each $20
$ Change $ Change
Recreation Complex Other Parks & Recreation Facilities (Cont.) Fee Description Unit

544
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
9 Hole each $20 $2 $22 $0 $22
9 Hole Senior each $18 $2 $20 $0 $20
9 Hole Youth Junior (14 17 and under, fee valid after 12 pm daily) each $11 $1 $12 $0 $12 9 Hole Family (1 adult & 1 youth Junior (14 17 and under), after 12pm daily) each $24 $2 $26 $0 $26 Add 9 Holes each $13 $1 $14 $0 $14
Twilight (last 2 hours of tee times) each $17 $2 $19 $0 $19 Cart Rental each $5 $1 $6 $0 $6
Club Rental each $17 $0 $17 $0 $17
Passes:
20 Use each $280 $28 $308 $0 $308
10 Use each $155 $16 $171 $0 $171
10 Use Twilight (after 3 pm last 2 hours of tee times) each $130 $13 $143 $0 $143 10 Use Senior each $140 $14 $154 $0 $154
10 Use Family (1 adult & 1 youth Junior (14 17 and under), after 12pm daily) each $180 $18 $198 $0 $198 10 Use Youth Junior (14 17 and under, fee valid after 12 pm daily) each $85 $9 $94 $0 $94 Individual Adult Season Pass (no restrictions) each $450 $45 $495 $0 $495 Individual Senior Season Pass (no restrictions) each n/a n/a $450 $0 $450 Individual Junior Pass (no restrictions) each n/a n/a $450 $0 $450 Administrative Fee for replacement of annual passes only each $10 $0 $10 $0 $10 Bijou Golf Course use in partnership with Boys and Girls Club No Charge No Charge $0 No Charge $0 No Charge Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Campground Site Fee - No hook up, up to 6 people and 1 car (includes $10 infrastructure fee) per day $45 $2 $47 $0 $47
Standard Cabin (includes $10 infrastructure fee) per day $90 $0 $90 $0 $90 Reservation Fee (non-refundable) each $10 $0 $10 $0 $10 Cancellation Fee (Inside 30 days from arrival date) One night rental fee $50 $0 $50 $0 $50 Cancellation Fee (Outside 30 days of arrival date) each $10 $0 $10 $0 $10 Dump Fee (charged to campers not staying in our campground) each $15 $0 $15 $0 $15 Extra person each $6 $0 $6 $0 $6
Visitor Day Use each $5 $0 $5 $0 $5
Pets each $2 $0 $2 $0 $2
Extra Vehicle (no holding tanks) each $6 $0 $6 $0 $6
Motorcycles and Electric Scooters each $3 $0 $3 $0 $3
Late Checkout Fees per site $10 $0 $10 $0 $10
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Day Use per day $17 $0 $17 $0 $17
Annual Pass each $138 $0 $138 $0 $138
$ Change
$ Change
$ Change
$ Change
$ Change
$ Change
Boat Ramp*
Fee Description Unit
*The Division of Boating and Waterways currently limits these fees to $17 for Day Use and $138 for an Annual Pass.

Fee Description Unit
Campground
Fee Description Unit
Golf Course

545
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
ICE ARENA:

Learn to Play n/a Free n/a n/a $0 Free
Morning School Skate n/a Free n/a n/a $0 Free
School Skate Week (PE program) n/a Free n/a n/a $0 Free Military Discount (Served In combat area) n/a Free n/a n/a $0 Free Wounded Warriors (military event) n/a Free n/a n/a $0 Free Charity Events (i.e. St. Baldrick's), fees subject to review n/a Ice free all day n/a n/a $0 Ice free all day Ice Sheet Rental See schedule for rates by time per hour $491 n/a n/a $0 $491 Party Room Full (hourly - 1 hour minimum) per hour $125 n/a n/a $0 $125 SKATING PROGRAMS:

Public Skate: 11 years & up per person $20 n/a n/a $0 $20 Public Skate: Youth (10 & under) per person $10 n/a n/a $0 $10 Public Skate: Child (3 & under) per person Free n/a n/a $0 Free Public Skate: Senior 55 & up per person $7 n/a n/a $0 $7 Blue Card (available to frequent users/members) each n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Skate Rental each n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Free Style - Drop - In each $15 n/a n/a $0 $15
Hockey - Drop - In per person $20 n/a n/a $0 $20
Hockey League: Adult 18-54 years, 10 games each $250 n/a n/a $0 $250 Hockey League: Single Game each $25 n/a n/a $0 $25
Hockey League: Youth each $113 n/a n/a $0 $113
SKATING LESSONS:

Skate/Hockey School: per lesson per lesson $20 n/a n/a $0 $20 Private Skate lessons (1 student, 2 student, 3 or more) per lesson Varies by instructor n/a n/a n/a Varies by instructor City Sponsored Ice Programs:

Partnerships with City recreation programs fee determined by program type and need
Fee determined by program type and
need n/a n/a n/a
Fee determined by
program type and
need
Facility Rentals (various use agreements):

Year Round Rentals for Rec Programs/Rec Center typically billed monthly Refer to contract Refer to contract n/a n/a n/a Refer to contract $ Change $ Change
**The listed Ice Arena Fees represent the maximum allowable charges.

Ice Arena**
Fee Description Unit

546
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Building Permit & Inspection:

Building Permit Fee (25% plan review deposit due with application) Valuation shall be determined at the discretion of the Building Official utilizing the most current square foot valuation based on the proposed use and type of construction as published by the International Code Council or construction contract value submitted by the applicant
% of valuation 2% of valuation - $263 minimum $0 2% of valuation - $263 minimum $8 2% of valuation - $271 minimum
Administrative Processing per hour/ 1 hr min. $128 $23 $151 $0 $151 Active Building Permit Extension each $191 $0 $191 $6 $197 Building Plan Review Extension each $191 $0 $191 $6 $197 Building Plan Review per hour / 1 hr min. $128 $0 $128 $4 $132 Stop Work Notice of Violation each $428 $0 $428 $13 $441 Stop Work/Red Tag Permit Fee each 2x the Building Permit Fee n/a 2x the Building Permit Fee n/a 2x the Building Permit Fee
Special Building Inspections
per hour / 1 hr. min. regular working
hours
per hour / 3 hr. min. outside of
regular working hours
$177 $0 $177 $5 $182
Building Inspection/Reinspection Fee each $177 $0 $177 $5 $182 Document Printing & Copying per page $0.10 $0 $0.10 $0 $0.10 Permit Technology Fee each permit $13 $18 $31 $0 $31
Illegal Unit Review each $1,107 $0 $1,107 $34 $1,141
Admin Fee for Cost of Collection on Liens, Nuisance, etc. % of collection costs 25% $0 25% $0 25% Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Application each $177 $0 $177 $5 $182 Demolition Permit each $440 $0 $440 $13 $453
Fire Sprinkler Fees and Inspections:

Residential Suppression Sys 1-50 hds per inspection $248 $0 $248 Residential Suppression Sys 50+ hds per inspection $604 $0 $604 Residential Fire Sprinkler % of valuation 2% of valuation - $263 minimum $0 2% of valuation - $263 minimum $8 2% of valuation - $271 minimum
Residential Fire Plan Review hourly $128 $0 $128 $4 $132 Notice of Violation (City Code 6.55.550) each n/a n/a n/a n/a $250 General Plan/Community Plan/Area Plan Maint. Fee each $1.15 per $1,000 valuation $0 $1.15 per $1,000 valuation $0.03
$1.18 per
construction
valuation
Re-check Fee (4th + Each Add'l Check) each n/a n/a $256 $0 $256 Fees for Work Not Specifically Identified Elsewhere hourly n/a n/a $177 $5 $182 Vacation Home Rental Fees:

Vacation Home Rental Permit Inspection Fee (Adopted 6/17/2025) each $177 n/a n/a $108 $285 Vacation Home Rental Permit Re-Inspection Fee (Adopted 6/17/2025) each $104 n/a n/a $61 $165 $ Change $ Change
Development Services - Building
Fee Description Unit

547
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Loan Subordination Fee each $2,161 $0 $2,161 $66 $2,227 Multi-Family Dwelling Inspection Fee each unit $104 $0 $104 $3 $107 Single Room Occupancy Inspection Fee each unit $104 $0 $104 $3 $107 Reinspection Service per hour / 1 hr. min. $177 $0 $177 $5 $182 Substandard Condition Inspection each $656 $0 $656 $20 $676 Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Allocations:

Deposit - Building Permit per application $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 Residential Permit Processing Allocation Application Processing per living unit each $784 $167 $951 $29 $980 Single-Family Allocation Acceptance per allocation
Under 2,000 sq. ft. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2,001-2,500 sq. ft. $2,101 $0 $2,101 $64 $2,165
2,501-3,000 sq. ft. $5,253 $0 $5,253 $160 $5,413
3,001-5,000 sq. ft. $10,506 $0 $10,506 $319 $10,825
>/=5,001 sq. ft. $15,759 $0 $15,759 $479 $16,238
Inclusionary Housing Plan Check Process each n/a n/a $152 $5 $157 Inclusionary Housing Requirement each nonexempt unit
Under 2,000 sq. ft. exempt $0 exempt $0 exempt
2,001-2,500 sq. ft. $5.29/Sq. Ft. $0 $5.29/Sq. Ft. $0 $5.29/Sq. Ft. 2,501-3,000 sq. ft. $5.84/Sq. Ft. $0 $5.84/Sq. Ft. $0 $5.84/Sq. Ft. 3,001-5,000 sq. ft. $16.77/Sq. Ft. $0 $16.77/Sq. Ft. $0 $16.77/Sq. Ft. >/=5,001 sq. ft. $17.65/Sq. Ft. $0 $17.65/Sq. Ft. $0 $17.65/Sq. Ft.

General Permits:

Major General Planning Application (variance, special use permit, major design review, wireless communications facilities, small wireless communications facilities) application $3,219 $2,566 $5,785 $176 $5,961 Minor General Planning Application (minor variance, minor design review, eligible facilities request) application $1,019 $3,282 $4,301 $131 $4,432 Permit Revision and/or Permit Extension each $600 $694 $1,294 $39 $1,333 Categorical Exemption each $82 $108 $190 $6 $196
Negative Declaration Review each $4,414 n/a Cost of consultant + 25% $0 Cost of consultant + 25%
Negative Declaration Preparation each $7,991 n/a Cost of consultant + 25% $0 Cost of consultant + 25%
EIR/EIS each Cost of consultant + 25% n/a Cost of consultant + 25% $0 Cost of consultant + 25%
Other Permits:

Non Residential Fence Permits each $291 $90 $381 $12 $393 Home Occupation Permit each $146 $82 $228 $7 $235
Minor Sign Review and Approval each $161 $296 $457 $14 $471 Major Sign Review and Approval each $400 $209 $609 $19 $628 Sign Application Revision each $161 $220 $381 $12 $393
Locally Unique Sign Application each $3,219 $1,120 $4,339 $132 $4,471 $ Change
$ Change
$ Change
$ Change
Development Services - Planning
Fee Description Unit
Fee Description Unit
Development Services - Housing

548
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Other Permits (Cont.):

Minor Special Event Permit each $231 $797 $1,028 $31 $1,059 Major Special Event Permit each $459 $569 $1,028 $31 $1,059 Non-Profit Producer and Free to the Public - Special Event each $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Temporary Use/Structure Permit each $689 $224 $913 $28 $941 Certificate of Compliance (Subdivision Map Act) each $888 $25 $913 $28 $941 Tentative Subdivision Map each $5,850 $734 $6,584 $200 $6,784 Condominiumization of Existing Residential Dev. each $6,016 $416 $6,432 $196 $6,628 Permit Technology Fee each permit n/a n/a $31 $0 $31
Cannabis Use Permit:

Cannabis Use Permit each $5,816 ($260) $5,556 $169 $5,725 Cost Recovery Deposit Amounts for Cannabis Use Permit and Development Agreement
a) Retailer / Cultivator / Testing Lab/ Manufacturing/ Distribution each $24,021 $0 $24,021 $730 $24,751 b) Microbusiness each $25,288 $0 $25,288 $769 $26,057
Annual Inspection Fee each $2,100 $0 $2,100 $64 $2,164
Re-Inspection Fee each $894 $0 $894 $27 $921
Other Services:

Zoning Letter each $253 $90 $343 $10 $353
Document Copying page $0.10 $0 $0.10 $0 $0.10
Planning Review of Building Permits per hour/1 hr. min. each $128 $24 $152 $5 $157 Admin Fee for Cost of Collection on Liens, Nuisance, etc. % of collection costs 25% $0 25% $0 25% Public Notice Label Preparation each $234 ($44) $190 $6 $196 Special Plan Inspections
per hour / 1 hr. min. regular working
hours
per hour / 3 hr. min. outside of
regular working hours
n/a n/a $177 $5 $182
Planning Documents:

General Plan Amendment each
Fully burdened hourly staff cost and/or
cost of consultant - $8,855 $10,000
deposit
$1,145 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Community Plan Amendment/Area Plan/Plan Area Statement each Fully burdened hourly staff cost and/or
cost of consultant - $8,855 $10,000
deposit
$1,145 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Annexation:

Annexation each hourly Fully burdened hourly staff cost - $10,000 deposit $10,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Mobile Vending:

Location Permit each $600 $237 $837 $25 $862
New Vendor Permit each $181
Renewal Permit each $90
Publicly Visible Art On Private Property:

Public Murals each $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Non-mural Publicly Visible Art each $263 $688 $951 $29 $980 Development Services - Planning (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit $ Change $ Change

549
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Street/Property Abandonment each $3,277 ($422) $2,855 $87 $2,942 Single-Family Residential Public Works plan review fee per hour $128 $17 $145 $4 $149 Multi-Family Residential Public Works plan review fee (6 units or less) per hour $128 $17 $145 $4 $149 Large Multi-Family Residential Public Works plan review fee (7 or more units) each $1,711 Large Multi-Family Residential Public Works plan review fee (7 or more units) per hour n/a n/a $145 $4 $149 Commercial Development/Redevelopment Public Works plan review fee per hour/1 hr min. $128 $17 $145 $4 $149 GIS Fee (special requests for information/maps) each $347 ($38) $309 $9 $318 Grading Fee < 3 10 cubic Yards (no fee) project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Grading Fee 3 - 7 10+ Cubic Yards project $566 $188 $754 $23 $777 Grading Fee 8 - 350 Cubic Yards project $957
Grading Fee 350+ Cubic Yards project $2,468
Parcel Merger/Lot Line Adjustment/Parcel Maps
(does not include county fees paid directly to El Dorado County) per hour/5 hr min. $128 $17 $145 $4 $149 Final Subdivision Map
(does not include county fees paid directly to El Dorado County) per hour/5 hr min. $128 $17 $145 $4 $149 Tentative Subdivision Map
(does not include county fees paid directly to El Dorado County) per hour $128 $17 $145 $4 $149 Obstruction Permit each $307 $33 $340 $10 $350
Encroachment (Street Cut) Permit/Minor each $766 ($426) $340 $10 $350 Encroachment (Street Cut) Permit/Major; base + 1.5% of Construction value >$20,000 each $766 ($263) $503 $15 $518
Transportation Yearly Permit each $148 ($58) $90 $0 $90 Transportation Single Permit each $105 ($89) $16 $0 $16 Permit Violation/Stop Work Fee each $1,532 $0 $1,532 $47 $1,579 Storm water Inspection Fee: Commercial each $262 $31 $293 $9 $302 Storm water Inspection Fee: Commercial Reinspection each $131 $162 $293 $9 $302 Storm water Inspection Fee: Industrial each $327 $73 $400 $12 $412 Storm water Inspection Fee: Industrial Reinspection each $131 $269 $400 $12 $412 Easement Request/Review each $1,417 $2,951 $4,368 $133 $4,501 Reproduction Fee per 23x26 sheet file plans and record
maps
$4 $9 $13 $0 $13
Street Name Change; actual costs of City staff, equipment, and materials each Actual $0 Actual $0 Actual Unapproved Work (ROW)/Correction Fee/Inspections of Repairs to City Infrastructure; deposit plus actual time and materials of various city staff each $946 $0 $946 $29 $975 Public Works Condominiumization of Existing Residential Dev. per hour/5 hr min. $128 $17 $145 $4 $149 Public Works Inspections/Re-Inspections each $177 ($32) $145 $4 $149 Third Party Plan Reviews each n/a n/a actual cost n/a actual cost Permit Technology Fee each permit n/a n/a $31 $0 $31
Public Works
Fee Description Unit $ Change $ Change

550
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Emergency Medical Service:

Advanced/Basic Life Support, incident response* hourly incident $532 + Medicare Mileage factor $66 $598 + Medicare Mileage factor $18 $616 + Medicare Mileage factor Advanced/Basic Life Support - with standby to support air ambulance transport, incident response hourly $1,032/hr
Advanced/Basic Life Support - with engine standby for CPR, incident response hourly $1,032/hr County Fire Services:

Lake Valley Fire District Contract Per agreement (with CPI) Fallen Leaf Fire District Contract Per agreement (with CPI) Wild Land Fire Suppression Fee:

Support Vehicle hourly CA OES rate n/a CA OES rate n/a CA OES rate Pumping Engine hourly CA OES rate n/a CA OES rate n/a CA OES rate Ladder Truck hourly CA OES rate
Motor Vehicle Accident:

Level 1 Basic Response X hourly incident $1,159 $247 $1,406 $43 $1,449 Level 2 Extrication X hourly incident $1,757 $121 $1,878 $57 $1,935 Level 3 Multi Casualty X hourly incident $2,577 $760 $3,337 $101 $3,438 Hazardous Materials Clean-Up:

Level 1 Basic Response X hourly incident $771 $461 $1,232 $37 $1,269 Level 2 Full Alarm Response X hourly incident $2,577 $764 $3,341 $102 $3,443 Bomb Response/Bomb Squad:

Level 1 Full Alarm Response X hourly incident $1,159 $73 $1,232 $37 $1,269 Level 2 Full Alarm Engine Response plus TD Bomb Unit X hourly incident $2,577 $239 $2,816 $86 $2,902 Pipeline Breakage/Power Line Incidents:

Level 1 Single Engine X hourly incident $1,159 $15 $1,174 $36 $1,210 Level 2 Full Alarm Engine Response X hourly incident $2,577 $66 $2,643 $80 $2,723 Fire Hydrant Flow Test hourly 337
Witnessed Acceptance Test hourly 337
Fire Watch Service X Actual costs n/a Actual costs n/a Actual costs hourly per engine $2,577
hourly per ladder truck $2,577
Structure Fire Suppression (includes scene safety, initial investigation, traffic control, patient contact, hazard control) X incident n/a n/a $2,860 $87 $2,947 Emergency Assistance to Boats/Water Incidents: Includes boat responses, swift water and ice rescues, etc.

Level 1 Single Engine X incident $1,159 $78 $1,237 $38 $1,275 $ Change $ Change
*As it pertains to "Advanced Basic Life Support Fee" also known as a First Responder Fee, the Fire Chief's office has discretionary authorization to waive fees under the following criteria:
• Patients relying on government sponsored insurance plans such as Medicare, Medicaid and Medi-Cal. • Patients demonstrating a financial burden such as those on fixed income. • Patients who petition for a fee waiver for other exigent circumstances may request a waiver with final decision by the Fire Chief.

Fire Department
Fee Description Recovery
USA Unit
Structure Fire Suppression (includes scene safety, initial investigation, traffic control, patient contact, hazard control) X

551
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Rescue: Includes working with Search & Rescue for victim recovery, Rope Rescue, etc.

Level 1 in City X incident $819 $413 $1,232 $37 $1,269
Miscellaneous Fees:

False Alarm Responses 1st Offense X response $164 $0 $164 $5 $169 False Alarm Responses 2nd Offense X response $274 $0 $274 $8 $282 Open Burning and Recreational Fires inspection $273
Ceremonial/Special Permit each n/a n/a $70 $2 $72
Arson Investigation - Includes scene safety, investigation, source ID, Arson dog, equipment use, mobile detection and report X investigation At cost using fully burdened rate n/a At cost using fully burdened rate n/a At cost using fully burdened rate Fire Investigation Reports report $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fire Incident Report report $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Copies page no fee $0.10 ($0.10) $0 $0 $0
Photographs See police fee See police fee
Video Tape Duplication See police fee See police fee
Fireworks/Pyrotechnical Display Permit permit $448 ($201) $247 $8 $255 Fire Dance Permit Annual Fee permit $225 ($36) $189 $6 $195 Per Event Inspection each $58
Defensible Space Inspections for AB38 (Real Estate Sale) per hour $32 $66 $98 $3 $101 Defensible Space Inspections for Homeowners (includes tree marking) per hour inspection $32 $66 $98 $3 $101 Tree Removal Permit each n/a n/a $75 $2 $77
Special Event / Fire Inspections
per hour / 1 hr. min. regular
working hours
per hour / 3 hr. min. outside of
regular working hours
$177
Misc. Event Standby per event n/a n/a $338 $10 $348
Fire Plan Review & Inspection Fees:

Auto Alarm/Ext System - 10 per inspection $248
Auto Alarm/Ext System - 100 per inspection $604
Suppression Sys-50 hds/Dry Chem sys per inspection 248
Suppression Sys-200 hds per inspection 604
Underground Main Inspection <2" per inspection $121 $101 $222 $7 $229 Underground Main Inspection >2" per inspection $248 ($26) $222 $7 $229 Board 7 Care Facility 7-50 per inspection 138
Board 7 Care Facility 50+ per inspection 343
Day Care Facility 6+ per inspection $128 $70 $198 $6 $204 Fire Plan Review - Commercial, MFD, Special Event each per hour $263 ($64) $199 $0 $199 Basic Fire Inspection, <1k k sq. ft. each $96 $77 $173 $5 $178 Basic Fire Inspection, 1k - 4k sq. ft. each $134 $88 $222 $7 $229 Basic Fire Inspection, 4k - 9k sq. ft. each $161 $110 $271 $8 $279 Basic Fire Inspection, >9 k sq. ft. each $204 $141 $345 $10 $355 Basic Fire Inspection - hourly, after 4 hours per hour n/a n/a $99 $3 $102 Child Care Inspection Occupancy Permit Non-Home each $109 $64 $173 $5 $178 Child Care Inspection Occupancy Permit Home each $109 $64 $173 $5 $178 $ Change Recovery
USA Unit $ Change
Fire Department (Cont.)
Fee Description

552
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Fire Plan Review & Inspection Fees (Cont.)
Miscellaneous Fire Services each actual cost n/a actual cost n/a actual cost Fire Inspection/Re-Inspection (incl. Special Events)
each per hour / 1 hr. min.
regular working hours
per hour / 3 hr. min. outside of
regular working hours
$177 $0 $177 $5 $182
Operational Permit and Inspection CFC 105.6 each $254 ($7) $247 $8 $255 Fire Administrative Processing per hour/ 1 hr min. n/a n/a $151 $0 $151 $ Change
Fire Department (Cont.)
Fee Description Recovery
USA Unit $ Change

553
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Special Business Regulation:

Other Permits - New each $474 $59 $533 $16 $549
Other Permits - Renewal each $235 $42 $277 $8 $285
Pedicab Permit - Owner/Operator New each $263 $10 $273 $8 $281 Pedicab Permit - Owner/Operator Renewal each $92 ($1) $91 $3 $94 Pedicab Permit - Driver New each $156 $41 $197 $6 $203
Pedicab Permit - Driver Renewal each $61 ($11) $50 $2 $52 Sidewalk Vending Permit - New each $165 $62 $227 $7 $234 Sidewalk Vending Permit - Renewal each $28 $52 $80 $2 $82 Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity each $459 ($1) $458 $14 $472 Other Police Functions:

Misdemeanor Booking per booking $44 $2 $46 $1 $47
Fingerprinting each $27 $22 $49 $0 $49
Live Scan Fingerprinting each $18 $31 $49 $0 $49
Local Criminal Clearance Letter each $10 $35 $45 $1 $46 Towed Vehicle Release each $165 $77 $242 $7 $249
Special Police Service each actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate
DUI Incident Response - Police & Fire incident actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate
Copy of Dispatch Event report $0.11 $0 $0.11 $0 $0.11
Restitution Rate each actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate
Govt. Code Controlled Activities hourly actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate
Other Special Activities hourly actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate
Special Police Boat Service hourly actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate
Equipment Reimbursement each Actual cost n/a Actual cost n/a Actual cost Firearm(s) Release (by appointment only) weapon $44 $2 $46 $1 $47 Ski Run Blvd. Vehicle Control hourly actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate n/a actual cost at fully burdened rate
Tape Duplication - Audio tape $23 $0 $23 $1 $24
Tape Duplication - Video tape $23 $0 $23 $1 $24
Crime Scene/Police Photo Reproduction (CD photo) CD $23 $0 $23 $1 $24 Repossession Fee each n/a n/a $15 $0 $15
Police Department
Fee Description Unit $ Change $ Change

554
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Taxicab Fees:

Taxicab Company Permit Annual $5 $7 $12 $0 $12
Taxicab Vehicle Permit Annual per vehicle $5 $22 $27 $1 $28 Taxicab Driver Permit Annual $28 $23 $51 $2 $53
Police False Alarm Response:
1st & 2nd False Alarm No charge n/a No charge $0 No charge Excessive > 3 False Alarms alarm Per city code n/a Per city code $0 Per city code Non Permitted False Alarm Per city code $0 Per city code $0 Per city code Initial Permit Application - Resident, 3 year period permit $41 $20 $61 $2 $63 Renewal Permit - Resident, every 3 years permit $19 $19 $38 $1 $39 Initial Permit Application - Business, 1 year period permit $41 $20 $61 $2 $63 Renewal Permit - Business, every year permit $19 $19 $38 $1 $39 Vacation Home Rentals - Tourist Core:

Vacation Home Rental Application fee each $548 n/a n/a $17 $565 Vacation Home Rental Permit - Late Fee On Renewal violation Counted as violation n/a n/a n/a Counted as violation
Vacation Home Rental Permit Master Report report $68 n/a n/a $2 $70 Vacation Home Rental Permit Label Report report $63 + cost of labels n/a n/a $2 $65 + cost of labels 4 or less occupants $200 n/a n/a $0 $200
5 to 8 occupants $350 n/a n/a $0 $350
9 to 12 occupants $650 n/a n/a $0 $650
13 or more occupants $850 n/a n/a $0 $850
Fractional $19.23 to $850 n/a n/a $0 $19.23 to $850
Vacation Home Rentals - Non-Tourist Core:

Vacation Home Rental Application fee each $548 n/a n/a $17 $565 4 or less occupants $250 n/a n/a $420 $670
5 to 8 occupants $500 n/a n/a $840 $1,340
9 to 12 occupants $1,000 n/a n/a $1,680 $2,680
13 or more occupants $1,325 n/a n/a $2,160 $3,485
Vacation Home Rental Permit Master Report report $68 $2 $70 Qualified Vacation Home Rentals:

Qualified Vacation Home Rental Application fee each $548 4 or less occupants $100
5 to 8 occupants $150
9 to 12 occupants $200
13 or more occupants $250
Hosted Rental Fees:

Hosted Rental Permit each $288 n/a n/a $9 $297
Hosted Rental Annual Renewal Fee each $288 n/a n/a $9 $297 Parking Program:

Parking Garage per 20 min/daily max $1.25/$25 n/a n/a $0 $1.25/$25 Monthly Garage Pass April 1-Oct 31 each month $125 n/a n/a $0 $125 Winter Full Week Pass Nov 1-Mar 31 each month $175 n/a n/a $0 $175 6 Month Pass per 6 months $500 n/a n/a $0 $500
5 p.m. until 3 a.m. $.50 per 20 min/up to $5 $.50 per 20 min/up to $5 n/a n/a $0 $.50 per 20 min/up to $5
Police Department (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit
Vacation Home Rental Permit - Annual Fee - Tourist Core Vacation Home Rental Permit - Annual Fee - Non-Tourist Area (Adopted 6/17/2025) Qualified Vacation Home Rental Permit - Annual Fee
$ Change $ Change

555
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Parking Program (Cont.):

Holiday Rates (can include days before/after Holiday) Double Regular Rates $2.50/$50 n/a n/a $0 $2.50/$50 Parking validations - 1 packet of 50 - 1 hr validations each packet of 50 $50 n/a n/a $0 $50 Electric Car Charging Electricity Fee each Rate as determined by STJPPFA n/a n/a $0 Rate as determined by STJPPFA
Electric Car Charging Overstay Fee each Rate as determined by STJPPFA n/a n/a $0 Rate as determined by STJPPFA
Parking - Bellamy/Transit Way per 20 min/2 hr max $2 n/a n/a $0 $2 Parking - Upper Ski Run (identified in map) per contract per contract n/a n/a $0 per contract Cannabis:

Public Safety License Fee each $1,190 + $85 x's # of employees (fingerprint/background) $0
$1,190 + $85 x's # of
employees
(fingerprint/backgro
und)
$0
$1,190 + $85 x's # of
employees
(fingerprint/backgro
und)
Public Safety License Renewal Fee each $1,190 + $85 x's # of employees (fingerprint/background) $0
$1,190 + $85 x's # of
employees
(fingerprint/backgro
und)
$0
$1,190 + $85 x's # of
employees
(fingerprint/backgro
und)
Public Safety License Amendment Fee each $300 $4 $304 $9 $313 Public Safety Mitigation Fee Amounts:

Retailer each $13,750
Microbusiness with Retail each $21,250
Testing Lab/Manufacturer, Cultivator, Distributor, Microbusiness without Retail each $7,500 Delivery Component each $5,000
Shared Mobility:

Shared Mobility Device Fee per device $83 $30 $113 $3 $116 Shared Mobility Device Operator Violation per incident n/a n/a n/a n/a $100 Shared Mobility Device Rider Violation per incident n/a n/a n/a n/a $100 Parking Citations:

City Code:

4.25.300 - Parking, Restricted Parking Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.330 - No Stopping Zone Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.360 - Time Limited Parking Zone Occurrence $55 n/a n/a $0 $55

4.25.370 - Parked in Excess of 72 Hours Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.410 - Parked Wrong Side of Street Occurrence $25 n/a n/a $0 $25

4.25.435 - Parked in an Electric Vehicle Charging Space Occurrence n/a n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.440 - Designated Taxi Zone / Bus Stop Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.590 - Parking Garage Payment Required Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.600 - Parking Garage Parked within Parking Space Occurrence $55 n/a n/a $0 $55

4.25.620 - Use of Entrance and Exit Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.740 - Paid Parking - No Ticket Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.750 - Paid Parking Time Expired Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75

4.25.840 - Residential Parking / Permit Zone Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 Police Department (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit $ Change $ Change

556
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Parking Citations (Cont.):

City Code:

4.95.050 - Private Property - Restrictions Occurrence $200 n/a n/a $0 $200

7.05.420 - Area restricted-Snow Removal Occurrence $205 n/a n/a $0 $205 All other City Parking Codes Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 California Vehicle Codes:
21113 - Parking on Public Grounds Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 21113(a) - Unauthorized parking on public grounds Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 21211(b) - Park in bike path Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 21211a - Blocking designated bicycle path Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 22500.1 - Parked In Fire Lane Occurrence $105 n/a n/a $0 $105 22500a - Park Within Intersection Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 22500b - Park on Crosswalk Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 22500d - Park Within 15ft Fire Station driveway Occurrence $105 n/a n/a $0 $105 22500e - Block Driveway Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75
22500f - Park on a Sidewalk Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 22500g - Obstructing Traffic/HWY Construction Occurrence $105 n/a n/a $0 $105 22500h - Double Parking Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75
22500i - Park in Bus Loading Zone Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 22507 (a) - Heavenly Valley No Parking/RPP Area Occurrence $300 n/a n/a $0 $300 22507 (a) - Lakeside Residential Neighborhood No Parking/RPP Area Occurrence $300 n/a n/a $0 $300 22507.8(a) - Handicap Disabled Only Occurrence $455 n/a n/a $0 $455 22507.8(b) - Block Disabled Stall/Space Occurrence $455 n/a n/a $0 $455 22507.8c - Parked in Handicap Crosshatch Occurrence $455 n/a n/a $0 $455 22514 - Within 15ft of Fire Hydrant Occurrence $105 n/a n/a $0 $105 22515 - Unattended Running Vehicle Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 22523(b) - Abandoned Vehicle Occurrence $250 n/a n/a $0 $250 4000a - Expired Registration Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 5204(a) - No Tabs Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75
All other California Vehicle Codes Occurrence $75 n/a n/a $0 $75 Administrative Citations*
City Code:

2.30.060 (E) - Administrative Fee for Administrative Citations Occurrence $20 n/a n/a $0 $20

2.30.080 (A) - Administrative Hearing Fee for Administrative Citations Occurrence $100 n/a n/a $0 $100

3.35.040 - No Business License Occurrence $100 n/a n/a $0 $100

3.50.380 (B) - Unpermitted VHR - Owner/Agent Responsible First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (B ) - Vacation Home Rental (Parking Space Availability - Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (C )- Vacation Home Rental (Commercial Activity Prohibited - Occupant and Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (D) - Vacation Home Rental (Compliance with SLTCC - Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
Police Department (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit $ Change $ Change

557
Adopted Fee Proposed Fee Proposed Fee
3/25/2025 per GCP 3.04%
Administrative Citations (Cont.)*
City Code:

3.50.440 (E) - Vacation Home Rental (Posting of Permit - Owner/Agent Responsible) First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (F) - Vacation Home Rental (Marketing/Advertising Requirements - Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (G) - Vacation Home Rental (Authorization to Inspect - Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (H) - Vacation Home Rental (Outdoor Spas/Hot Tubs prohibited between 10 p.m.-8 a.m. - Occupant and Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (I) - Vacation Home Rental (Interior Signage - Owner/Agent Responsible) First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (J) - Vacation Home Rental (Exterior Signage - Owner/Agent Responsible) First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (K) - Vacation Home Rental (Parking Requirements - Occupant and Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (L) - Vacation Home Rental (Noise and Amplified Music Prohibited between 10 p.m. - 8 a.m. - Occupant and Owner/Agent Responsible) First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (M) - Vacation Home Rental (Emergency Lighting - Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (N) - Vacation Home Rental (Lighting Design - Owner/Agent Responsible) First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (O) - Vacation Home Rental (Parking of Commercial Vehicle - Occupant and Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (P) - Vacation Home Rental (Records Relating to VHR - Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (Q) - Vacation Home Rental (Camping Prohibited - Occupant and Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.440 (R ) - Vacation Home Rental (Trash/Bear Boxes Required - Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

3.50.450 (D) Vacation Home Rental (Operating without a Permit) (Owner/Agent Responsible)
First occurrence
Second occurrence within year
Subsequent occurrence within year
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000
n/a n/a $0
$1,500
$3,000
$5,000

4.150 - Refuse and Garbage Occurrence $150 n/a n/a $0 $150 $ Change $ Change
Police Department (Cont.)
Fee Description Unit