Agenda packet — South Lake Tahoe City Council, September 8, 2026 (part 6 of 8)

SLA0001522
Beach, various parcels with existing City constructed stormwater infrastructure, and parcels located adjacent to existing City-owned parcels. The Exchange Property will be used for open space purposes by the City.

The Properties are located within the Lake Tahoe region as defined in Section 66905.5.

Therefore, a notice of availability of surplus land for open-space purposes as described in subdivision (b) of Section 54222 was issued on February 19, 2025. The Washoe Tribe of Nevada in California responded and expressed interest in the Properties but have since formally withdrawn their interest via email.

Conclusion
If the submitted documentation and assertions by the City are complete and accurate, HCD finds that the Property qualifies as “exempt surplus land” under Government Code section 54221, subdivision (f)(1)(C).

If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Courtney Ide, Housing Policy Specialist, at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Laura Nunn
Housing Accountability Unit Chief
Housing Policy Development
1360
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 1 of 11
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
September 8, 2026
Authorizing the Mayor to sign the Exchange and Bargain Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions with the California Tahoe Conservancy

BACKGROUND
A. The City of South Lake Tahoe owns seven parcels totaling approximately 181 acres of property (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 025-062-037, 025-081-013, 025-091-012, 031-030- 020, 031-030-039, 080-010-013, and 080-020-008) (the “Subject Properties”) that are not needed for City purposes, and which, the City desires to exchange for 18 parcels totaling approximately 7.1 acres owned by the California Tahoe Conservancy (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 023-686-016, 026-065-016, 027-010-016, 027-010-024, 027-010-029, 027-053- 014, 027-073-005, 027-074-006, 027-112-013, 027-112-014, 027-112-015, 027-112-016, 027-112-017, 027-112-024, 027-134-022, 031-173-002, 031-173-004, and 032-090-0136) (the “CTC Properties”)
B. On September 6, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-117 declaring the Cityowned parcels to be exempt surplus land pursuant to the Surplus Land Act and authorized the City Manager to negotiate a land exchange agreement with the California Tahoe Conservancy.

C. On September 15, 2022, the California Tahoe Conservancy Board adopted Resolution 22- 09-03, authorizing the Conservancy staff to execute the exchange and transfer of Conservancy lands to the City of South Lake Tahoe.

D. Pursuant to the Surplus Land Act Guidelines Section 103(d)(4), the City has provided a Notice of Availability of the exempt lands on February 19, 2025, to all entities identified in Government Code Section 54222(b) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The City received one Letter of Interest from the Washoe Tribe of California and Nevada.

E. Pursuant to the requirements of the Surplus Land Act, the City entered into a good-faith negotiation with the Washoe Tribe of California and Nevada, which withdrew its interest in the exempt surplus lands on August 12, 2025.

F. Pursuant to Surplus Land Act Guideline Section 400(e), the City provided a Notice of Disposition to the California Department of Housing and Community Development of its intent to exchange lands with the California Tahoe Conservancy.

G. On August 28, 2025, the City received final approval from the California Department of Housing and Community Development, designating the City parcels as exempt surplus lands.
1361
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 2 of 11
H. On July 14, 2026, the City Council held a regularly scheduled meeting to consider the land exchange agreement.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Does hereby authorize the Mayor to sign the Exchange and Bargain Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions (Exhibit A), the Grant Deeds, Certificates of Acceptance and all other documents set forth in the Exchange and Bargain Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions or otherwise necessary to close the transactions contemplated herein.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on September 8, 2026, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Abstain:

Absent:

Date:

Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of an electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission.
1362
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 3 of 11

EXHIBIT A

EXCHANGE AND BARGAIN SALE AGREEMENT

AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
THIS EXCHANGE AND BARGAIN SALE AGREEMENT and JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (hereafter “Agreement) is entered into on this _____th day of ___________, 2026, by and between the CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY, an agency of the State of California (hereafter “Conservancy”), acting pursuant to its duly adopted resolution dated September 15, 2022 (22-09- 03) and the CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a municipal corporation, acting pursuant to its duly adopted Resolution No. 2022-117 dated September, 6, 2022 and Resolution No. __________ dated March __, 2026 (hereafter “City”). The Conservancy and the City may be referred to herein individually as “Party” or collectively as “the Parties”.

W I T N E S S E T H:

Recitals.

1. This Agreement contains the terms of an exchange of land, together with joint escrow instructions, between the Conservancy and City, of certain real property located in El Dorado County, California (“the Transaction”).

2. The Conservancy, pursuant to authority granted under Government Code section 66907, has acquired and has title to certain real property (hereafter “Conservancy Land”) located in El Dorado County, California, identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs):
 027-010-016 PART, -024, -029 (“Lakefront Properties”)  027-073-005, 027-074-006, 027-112-013, -014, -015, -016, -017, -024, -027-134- 022, 027-053-014, and 031-173-002 and -004 (“Water Quality Properties”)  026-065-016, 032-090-013, and 023-686-016 (“Management Efficiency Properties”)

3. The City has acquired and has title to certain real property (hereafter “City Land”) located in El Dorado County, California, identified as APNs:
 025-061-037, 025-081-013, 025-091-012, 080-010-013, and 080-020-008 (“Trout and Cold Creek Properties”)
 031-030-020 and -039 (“Link Road Properties”)

4. The Transaction entails the transfer of the City Land by the City to the Conservancy, and the transfer of the Conservancy Land by the Conservancy to the City, the restriction of future uses on the Lakefront Properties, the retention by the City of certain SEZ restoration credit and land coverage rights from the former Lake Christopher restoration project (APN 025-081-013) on the Trout and Cold Creek Properties, and the retention of commercial floor area and residential floor area banked by the Conservancy on APN 027-010-016 part, all as defined in this Agreement.

5. The aforementioned conveyance of the City Land to the Conservancy, as set forth herein below, includes transfer of all right, title, and interest to the City Land and all rights and interests appurtenant thereto, including all land coverage rights and development rights, except as defined in this Agreement below.

6. The aforementioned conveyance of the Conservancy Land to the City, as set forth herein below, includes transfer of all right, title, and interest to the Conservancy Land, and all rights 1363
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 4 of 11
and interests appurtenant thereto, including all land coverage rights and development rights, except as defined in this Agreement below and subject to use restrictions on the Lakefront Properties.

7. The Conservancy, pursuant to its enabling legislation set forth at Government Code §§ 66905 et seq., operates various programs for protecting and enhancing the environment of the Lake Tahoe Basin, including a program for the acquisition of environmentally sensitive lands and programs for the acquisition of lands for public access and watershed restoration purposes.

8. The Conservancy, on September 15, 2022 (Resolution No. 22-09-03), acting pursuant to Government Code §§ 66907.1 and 66907.8, authorized the acquisition of the portions of the City Land described in this Agreement below by means of a land exchange for the purposes of consolidate property ownership, improve land management efficiencies, and allow for future restoration opportunities. The City, on September 6, 2022 (Resolution No. 2022-117), authorized the acquisition of the portions of the Conservancy Land described in this Agreement below by means of a land exchange. The Exchange results in the City acquiring approximately 7.3 acres, consisting of public lakefront recreation land next to the City’s El Dorado Beach, various parcels with existing City stormwater facilities, and parcels next to City lands. The Exchange also results in the Conservancy acquiring approximately 180 acres of environmentally sensitive land along Trout and Cold Creeks and next to other Conservancy lands. The Exchange aligns with Conservancy land management purposes that prioritize resource protection and recreation use, provides future planning opportunities for watershed restoration complementing the Upper Truckee River Marsh project, and is consistent with the Conservancy’s Land Transfer Guidelines. The Exchange supports various goals of the Conservancy’s Strategic Plan.

9. The Conservancy grant agreement to the City for City acquisition of the Link Road parcels and a related recorded deed against the Link Road parcels confirm the Conservancy’s grant agreement purpose in the bike trail on the property.

10. Finally, the Exchange results in a net increase of state-owned land and supports California’s Pathways to 30x30 and the Natural and Working Lands Climate Smart Strategy, which seek to maximize carbon sequestration, provide public access, and enhance biodiversity.

11. The City Land subject to this Transaction is exempt surplus property under the Surplus Lands Act, Government Code section 54220 et seq., and the Surplus Lands Act Guidelines dated April 2021, as amended and renumbered August 1, 2024, under Sections 103(c)(4) (surplus land that a local agency is exchanging for another use) and 103(c)(5) (surplus land that is transferred to a state agency for that agency’s use), as found by the City Council in Resolution No. 2022-117.

12. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein, and the respective benefits accruing to the Parties hereto, the Parties agree as follows:
-

1. ESSENTIAL TERMS OF THE TRANSACTION.
a. Exchange.
1364
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 5 of 11
The Conservancy and City hereby agree on the terms and conditions set forth below, to carry out the Transaction, consisting of:
i. The conveyance by the Conservancy to the City of the following Conservancy Land together with all land coverage and other development rights associated with said portions of the Conservancy Land, except for reservation by the Conservancy of commercial floor area and residential floor area banked on APN 027-010-016 part, and subject to use restrictions on the Lakefront Properties:
 Lakefront Properties
 Water Quality Properties
 Management Efficiency Properties
as more particularly described above in Recital 2 and in the Grant Deed in Exhibit 1; ii. The conveyance by the City to the Conservancy of the following portions of the City Land together with all land coverage and other development rights associated with the said portions of the City Land, except for SEZ restoration credit and class 1b coverage banked on the Trout and Cold Creek Properties from the former “Lake Christopher” restoration project on APN 025-081-013:
 Trout and Cold Creek Properties
 Link Road Properties
as more particularly described above in Recital 3 and in the Grant Deed in Exhibit 2; b. Reservation and Allocation of Coverage
The Conservancy and City agree to the City retaining all the banked SEZ restoration credit and class 1b coverage as defined in Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances for the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (or any successor ordinance thereto) (also known as “SEZ Restoration Credit and Class 1b Coverage”) from the former Lake Christopher restoration project (APN 025-081-013) for the City’s use elsewhere at its sole discretion as more particularly described in Exhibit B of Exhibit 2 of this Agreement.

The amount of SEZ Restoration Credit and Class 1b coverage retained by the City shall be the remaining amount banked from the restoration of Lake Christopher.

Prior to the recording of the land exchange, the City agrees to establish a non-parcel receiver account with TRPA in which they will bank the retained SEZ Restoration Credit. c. Preliminary Title Reports.

The Conservancy acknowledges receipt of preliminary title report(s) on the City Land.City acknowledges receipt of preliminary title report(s) on the Conservancy Land. d. Closing Date.

This escrow shall close upon:
i. Satisfaction of all of the general conditions of the Transaction set forth in Section 1e) below; and
ii. Completion of all the deposits in escrow required in Section 2 below; and 1365
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 6 of 11
iii. Satisfaction of the specific conditions of close of escrow set forth in Section 3 below, but in any case, no later than September 30, 2026, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Conservancy and the City.
f. General Conditions of the Transaction.

The Parties agree and acknowledge that the Transaction, and close of escrow under this Agreement, are subject to the following general conditions:
i. None

2. OPENING OF ESCROW; DEPOSITS IN ESCROW
a. General provisions.

This Transaction shall be completed through an escrow (“the Escrow”) to be opened by and between the Conservancy and the City at Placer Title Company of South Lake Tahoe, California (hereafter “Escrow Holder”). Escrow Holder may request any Party to this Agreement to provide evidence of the identity of City or Conservancy or any person who is a signatory to any document deposited in escrow.
b. Deposits by the City.

The City shall deposit the following items in Escrow:
i. A Grant Deed (Exhibit 2) duly executed and acknowledged by City, conveying the City Land to the State of California;
ii. Certificates of Acceptance by City acknowledging City’s acceptance of the Conservancy Land;
iii. Change of Ownership form for the Conservancy Land, pursuant to Government Code section 27280; and
iv. Notice of the change of ownership of the Conservancy Land, to be mailed to the El Dorado County Assessor’s Office and to any special Districts with jurisdiction. c. Deposits by Conservancy.

The Conservancy shall deposit the following items in Escrow:
i. Grant Deeds (Exhibit 1) duly executed and acknowledged by Conservancy, conveying the Conservancy Land to City;
ii. Certificates of Acceptance acknowledging Conservancy’s acceptance of the City Land. iii. Change of Ownership form for the City Land, pursuant to Government Code section 27280; and
1366
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 7 of 11
iv. Notice of the change of ownership of the City Land, to be mailed to the El Dorado County Assessor’s Office and to any special Districts with jurisdiction.

3. CONDITIONS TO CLOSING ESCROW
Neither this Transaction, nor any part of it, may be closed until:
a. All of the items listed in Section 2. above have been deposited in Escrow; and b. All of the following conditions have been satisfied:
i. With respect to the conveyance of the City Land to the Conservancy:
(1) Escrow Holder is prepared to issue a Standard California Land Title Association owner's policy of title insurance (“CLTA Policy”) in the amount of One Hundred Thousand dollars ($100,000), showing title to the City Land vested in the State of California, free and clear of all liens, leases, encumbrances, assessments, encroachments, easements of records or otherwise, and taxes, except:

All exceptions regarding local taxes not owed by the State of California. ii. With respect to the conveyance of the Conservancy Land to City:
(1) Escrow Holder is prepared to issue a CLTA Policy in the amount of One Hundred Thousand dollars ($100,000), showing title to the Conservancy Land vested in City, free and clear of all liens, leases, encumbrances, assessments, encroachments, easements of records or otherwise, and taxes, except recorded exceptions as of the closing date and relevant taxes and fees.

4. CLOSING
Escrow Holder is authorized and instructed to close this Transaction when, and only when, all conditions to the close of escrow set forth in Paragraphs 1(e) and 3 above have been fully satisfied, but not later than the Closing Date, unless otherwise hereafter agreed to in writing by and between the Parties.

At close of escrow, Escrow Holder shall:
a. Date the Grant Deeds and any other documents in Escrow that are not already dated, with the date of the close of escrow;
b. Record in the following order:
i. Grant Deed (Exhibit 2) from City to the State of California, together with the Certificate of Acceptance by the Conservancy for the said deed. ii. Grant Deeds (Exhibit 1) from the State of California to the City, together with the Certificates of Acceptance by City for the said deeds.
c. Issue the CLTA Policies described in Sections 3.b.(i) and 3.b.(ii.) above to the respective Parties. The original and two copies of the respective title policies, together with conformed, 1367
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 8 of 11
facsimile copies of the recorded deeds to each Party, shall be mailed respectively to:
i. the California Tahoe Conservancy, Acquisition Section, 1061 Third Street, South Lake Tahoe, California 96150. The transmittal of the Conservancy’s CLTA Policy shall be accompanied by an invoice for one-half of the escrow fee and for the CLTA Policy premium for the City Land; and
ii. the City of South Lake Tahoe, Attn: City Clerk, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. The transmittal of City’s CLTA Policy shall be accompanied by an invoice for one-half of the escrow fee and for the CLTA Policy premium for the Conservancy Land.
d. Send a notice to cancel taxes for the City Land, with assessor parcel numbers and recording date, to the El Dorado County tax collector; and send a notice of the transfer of said parcel to the special assessment Districts) within which the said Parcels are located; and e. Send a notice to cancel taxes for the Conservancy Land, with assessor parcel numbers and recording date, to the El Dorado County tax collector; and send a notice of the transfer of said parcel to the special assessment Districts) within which the said Parcels are located.

5. CLOSING COSTS AND PRORATIONS
Closing costs shall be allocated and prorations made on the basis of a thirty (30) day month, as follows:
a. The Conservancy and City shall split equally the cost of the Escrow fee and pay their respective title fees due in this Transaction.
b. The grant deeds and easement grant deeds from the City to the Conservancy and the Conservancy to the City may be recorded without payment of recordation fees, pursuant to Government Code section 27383. In addition, no documentary transfer tax shall be paid in connection with the grant deeds or easement grant deeds from the City to the State of California for the transfer of the City Land or the grant deeds or easement grant deeds from the Conservancy to the City for the transfer of the Conservancy Land, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 11922.

6. EXTENSION OR CANCELLATION OF ESCROW
a. If, owing to the failure or inability to perform by either Party to this Agreement, Escrow does not close by the Closing Date, or such later closing date as may be hereafter agreed to in writing by and between the Parties, the other Party may cancel Escrow and receive the release of all sums or documents which it had previously deposited in Escrow.

Nothing in this paragraph shall detract from any other legal remedies which either Party may have in the event of the other Party’s default.
b. In the event that Escrow is cancelled, any escrow cancellation fee shall be borne by the Party whose failure or inability to perform was the cause or reason for the cancellation.

7. RELEASES FROM ESCROW
1368
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 9 of 11
All documents released at close of Escrow to which the Conservancy is entitled shall be sent to:

California Tahoe Conservancy
Attn: Aimee Rutledge, Acquisitions
1061 Third Street
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
All documents released at close of escrow to which the City is entitled shall be sent to:

City of South Lake Tahoe
Attn: ZacharyThomas, Director of Development Services
1052 Tata Lane
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150

8. MUTUAL UNDERSTANDINGS, REPRESENTATIONS, AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Application of securities laws.

The Parties to this Agreement acknowledge that this transaction does not constitute the sale or transfer of a “security” under Federal or State law. b. Execution of supplemental instructions or amendments.

This Agreement shall serve as joint escrow instructions to the Escrow Holder. Each Party agrees to execute, at the request of the other, such amendments to this document or supplemental escrow instructions as may be necessary to comply with applicable law or with the administrative regulations or procedures of the TRPA, the State of California, the City or as otherwise necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Agreement; provided, that such amendments or supplemental instructions do not alter the essential financial terms of this Transaction or the duration of Escrow.
c. Captions.

The captions on the articles and sections of this Agreement are for convenience only, and shall be of no force or effect in the interpretation of the Agreement. d. Entire Agreement
The contents of this Agreement are the entire agreement between the Parties, and supersede all written and oral communication between the Parties prior to its execution, all understanding and negotiations regarding the same having been merged herein. e. Modification
This Agreement shall not be modified except by the written agreement of the Parties.

9. NOTICES
All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by U.S. Mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested. The date of notice shall be deemed to be the first 1369
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 10 of 11
business day following mailing. The Parties' addresses for purposes of notices are shown beneath the signature blocks below.

REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
SEE SIGNATURE BLOCKS ON FOLLOWING PAGE.
1370
Resolution 2026-XXX September 8, 2026 Page 11 of 11

CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY
By ______________________________ Date: _______________________ Jason Vasques
Executive Director
1061 Third Street
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
BY: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Cody Bass
Mayor
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
1371
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California Tahoe Conservancy
1061 Third Street
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
OFFICIAL STATE BUSINESS – EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 AND DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX PURSUANT TO REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE SECTION 11922. SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Grant Deed
Agency: California Tahoe Conservancy &
City of South Lake Tahoe
Project: CTC, City SLT Exchange
File No.:

ABMS: File:

El Dorado County APNs: 025-061-037, 025-081-013, 025-091-012, 080-010-013, 080-020-008, 031-030-020 and 39 The City of South Lake Tahoe
hereby GRANTS to the State of California, California Tahoe Conservancy the following described real property situated in the State of California, County of El Dorado, described as follows:

See Exhibit “A”
consisting of ____ (__) pages attached hereto
and by this reference made a part hereof.

SUBJECT TO
reservations contained in “Exhibit B” consisting of one (1) page attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.

Dated:

By:
1372
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF “PROPERTY”
LAND KNOWN AS “TROUT AND COLD CREEK PROPERTIES” (EL DORADO APNS 025-061-037, 025-081-013, 025-091-012, 080-010-013, 080-020-008)
SEE “EXHIBIT B” FOR RESERVATIONS RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ON “TROUT AND COLD CREEK PROPERTIES”
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
LAND KNOWN AS “LINK ROAD PROPERTIES” (EL DORADO APNS 031-030-020 and -039) APN: 031-030-039
1378
EXHIBIT “B”
Reservation of Development Rights, Trout and Cold Creek Property (related to restoration on El Dorado APN 025-081-013)
The City of South Lake Tahoe (“Grantor”) hereby reserves without limitation in its non parcel receiver account all SEZ Restoration Credit and Land Coverage banked related to the Lake Christopher restoration (restoration occurred on El Dorado APN 025-081-013). This reservation does not apply to any other coverage associated with the parcel.

Prior to the recording of the land exchange, the City agrees to establish a non-parcel receiver account with TRPA in which they will bank the retained SEZ Restoration Credit. 1379
EXHIBIT “C”
LINK ROAD PROPERTIES” (EL DORADO APNS 031-030-020 and -039) The City (“Grantor”) and the California Tahoe Conservancy (“Grantee”) hereby agree, for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, as follows:

The City and the Conservancy are pursuing the Exchange to consolidate property ownership, improve land management efficiencies, and provide public benefits. The Exchange results in the Conservancy acquiring approximately 3.5 acres, consisting of vacant land located adjacent to the Truckee Marsh.

The parties hereby covenant and agree as follows:

1. Use of the Property. Grantee agrees that the property described in Exhibit “A” to this Grant Deed (“the Property”) shall be held, used, and conveyed subject to the following restrictions:
a. Grantee shall endeavor to relocated the bike trail out of the Stream Environment Zone/Flooplain and will coordinate with the City on a potential spur alignment connection to Sussex Avenue.
1380
EXHIBIT “C”
Form of Certificate of Acceptance of Grant Deed
As required by Government Code Section 27281, this is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Grant Deed dated ___________, 20__, from the City of South Lake Tahoe, a California municipal corporation, to the California Tahoe Conservancy, a State Agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the California Tahoe Conservancy pursuant to authority conferred by Board Resolution 22-09--03, and the California Tahoe Conservancy consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Dated: ___________________________, 20__
CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY, a State Agency
By: _____________________________________
Name: __________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ 1381
ary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.

COUNTY OF EL DORADO )
On ______________________ before me, ______________________________________ a Notary Public, personally appeared ________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of ________________ that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: ___________________________________
Name: ______________________________________ (Seal)
(typed or printed)
1382
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

ABMS: File:

El Dorado County APNs: 027-010-016 part, 027-010-024 and 029, 027-073-005, 027-074-006, 027-112-013, 14, 15, 16, 17, 24, 027-134-022, 027-053-014, 031-173-002, 4, 026-065-016, 032-090-013 and 023-686-016.

The State of California, California Tahoe Conservancy
hereby GRANTS to the City of South Lake Tahoe the following described real property situated in the State of California, County of El Dorado, described as follows:

See Exhibit “A”
consisting of six (6) pages attached hereto
and by this reference made a part hereof.

SUBJECT TO
the covenants, terms, conditions, reservations and restrictions contained in Exhibit “B” consisting of two (2) pages
and “Exhibit C” consisting of one (1) page
attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.

Dated:

By:

Jason Vasques, Executive Director
1383
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF “PROPERTY”
LAND KNOWN AS “LAKEFRONT PROPERTIES” (EL DORADO APNS 027-010-016 PART, -024 AND -029) SEE “EXHIBIT B” FOR USE RESTRICTIONS ON “LAKEFRONT PROPERTIES”.

SEE “EXHIBIT C” FOR RESERVATIONS RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ON “LAKEFRONT PROPERTIES” EXCEPTING THEREFROM:
1384
1385
1386
EL DORADO COUNTY APN 027-010-016 PART, MAP
1387
LAKEFRONT PROPERTIES, CONTINUED, EL DORADO APN 027-010-024 1388
LAKEFRONT PROPERTIES, CONTINUED, EL DORADO APN 027-010-029 1389
LAND KNOWN AS “WATER QUALITY PROPERTIES” (EL DORADO APNS 027-073-005, 027-074-006, 027-112- 013, -014, -015, -016, -017, -024, 027-134-022, 027-053-014, and 031-173-002 and -004) 1390

WATER QUALITY PROPERTIES, CONTINUED, VARIOUS APNS
1391
LAND KNOWN AS “MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY PROPERTIES” (EL DORADO APNS 026-065-016, 032-090-013, and 023-686-016)
APN: 023-686-016
1392
EXHIBIT “B”
Use Restrictions on All Lakefront Properties in Exhibit A above (EL DORADO APNS 027-010-016 PART, 024 AND 029)
.

The California Tahoe Conservancy (“Grantor”) and the City of South Lake Tahoe (“Grantee”) hereby agree, for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, as follows:

Recitals
The Conservancy and the City are pursuing the Exchange to consolidate property ownership, improve land management efficiencies, and provide public benefits. The Exchange results in the City acquiring approximately 7.3 acres, consisting of public lakefront recreation land next to the City’s El Dorado Beach, various parcels with existing City stormwater facilities, and parcels next to City lands.

The Exchange also results in the Conservancy acquiring approximately 180 acres of environmentally sensitive land along Trout and Cold Creeks and next to other Conservancy lands. The Exchange aligns with Conservancy land management purposes that prioritize resource protection and recreation use, provides future planning opportunities for watershed restoration complementing the Upper Truckee River Marsh project, and is consistent with the Conservancy’s Land Transfer Guidelines. The Exchange supports Goals 1 and 3 of the Conservancy’s Strategic Plan. Goal 1 tasks the Conservancy with implementing and developing innovative interagency agreements that increase the Conservancy’s and partners’ ability and capacity to manage lands and maintain recreational facilities. Goal 3 tasks the Conservancy to provide opportunities for all people to experience and enjoy Lake Tahoe’s rivers, wildlife, and mountains. Finally, the Exchange results in a net increase of state-owned land and supports California’s Pathways to 30x30 and the Natural and Working Lands Climate Smart Strategy, which seek to maximize carbon sequestration, provide public access, and enhance biodiversity.

The parties hereby covenant and agree as follows:

1. Restrictions on Use of the Property. Grantee agrees that the property described in Exhibit “A” to this Grant Deed (“the Property”) shall be held, used, and conveyed subject to the following restrictions:
a. Grantee shall use, manage, operate, and maintain the primary use of the Property in a manner consistent with providing and preserving public lakefront access, including public recreation, open space, scenic vistas, public park purposes, water quality and natural resource enhancement, and climate adaptation. No use or development of the Property inconsistent with these purposes, including residential, tourist accommodation, or commercial uses, shall be permitted. This restriction is not intended to prohibit outdoor recreation concessions consistent with the primary use of the Property. b. Grantee shall ensure that any agreement to transfer the Property requires the transferee to adhere to the restrictions on use contained herein.

2. Monitoring. On reasonable prior written notice from Grantor, Grantee shall allow Grantor to inspect the Property to ascertain compliance with the restrictions contained herein.

3. Remedies. The Grantor may use any remedy available in law or equity to enforce the covenants and restrictions contained here. Grantor and Grantee expressly agree that the Property is unique and a violation of this agreement, and the ensuing harm to the Property, may result in damages that are irremediable and not subject to quantification. Accordingly, Grantee agrees that Grantor’s 1393
remedies at law for a violation may be inadequate and that Grantor is entitled to the remedies of injunction, specific performance, or other equitable relief for any actual or threatened violation.

4. Runs with the Land. The covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions contained herein shall run with the Property in perpetuity, shall be effective limitations on the use of the Property from the date of recordation of this document, and shall bind Grantee and its successors and assigns. The parties agree that these covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions are made for the direct benefit of the Property and the people of California.

5. Construction and Validity. If a court in a final determination holds any provision herein invalid, or if, for any other reason any provision becomes unenforceable, no other provision shall be affected.

6. Amendment. No modification to this Grant Deed shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by Grantor and Grantee, and recorded in the official records of the County of El Dorado, California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor and the Grantee have caused this instrument to be executed on their behalf by their respective and duly authorized officers, on the following dates, effective as of __________, 20__.
_________________________ ____________
California Tahoe Conservancy Date
Grantee herby accepts, concurs in, and agrees to all the covenants, conditions, and restrictions set forth in this Grant Deed.
_________________________ ____________
City of South Lake Tahoe Date
1394
EXHIBIT “C”
Reservation of Development Rights, El Dorado APN 027-010-016 part The California Tahoe Conservancy (“Grantor”) hereby reserves without limitation in its land bank all development rights except for those banked related to El Dorado APN 027-010-016, consisting of Commercial Floor Area and Residential Floor Area which shall transfer to the City with that parcel. 1395
EXHIBIT “D”
Form of Certificate of Acceptance of Grant Deed
As required by Government Code Section 27281, this is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Grant Deed dated ___________, 20__, from the California Tahoe Conservancy, a State Agency, to the City of South Lake Tahoe, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the City of South Lake Tahoe pursuant to authority conferred by the resolution of the City of South Lake Tahoe adopted on _____________, 20__, and the City of South Lake Tahoe consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Dated: ___________________________, 20__
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a California municipal corporation By: _____________________________________
Name: __________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ 1396
ary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of ________________ that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: ___________________________________
Name: ______________________________________ (Seal)
(typed or printed)
1397
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: September 8,
2026
Agenda Item #:17
Agenda Item: Request for Interest - Re-Use of Former Recreation and Swim Complex Executive Summary: At the March 24, 2026 City Council meeting, Council directed staff to issue a Request for Interest to determine whether community groups, nonprofit organizations, or other publicserving entities were interested in reusing the former Recreation and Swim Complex for recreationrelated activities. Staff conducted broad outreach to more than 20 organizations, and after a 35-day response period, the City received two responses, with only one deemed complete. The accepted response did not propose reuse of the existing facility. Instead, the organization expressed interest in demolition of the current building and future discussions regarding construction of a new indoor recreation facility. The existing facility presents significant financial, operational, and structural challenges. Annual operating costs are estimated at $606,900, while major repairs and upgrades necessary for longer-term use are estimated at $15.8 million. While vacant, the building continues to cost the City approximately $20,000 per month in maintenance costs. Since closure, the site has also experienced break-ins, homelessness-related impacts, and general blight. Given the lack of viable community interest in reuse of the existing structure, the substantial cost of continued operation or rehabilitation, and the ongoing maintenance and nuisance issues associated with vacancy, demolition is recommended as the most fiscally responsible next step.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Staff recommend the City Council pass a Motion directing staff to 1. Add the demolition of the former Recreation and Swim Complex to the Capital Improvement Program project list for FY2026-27 at an estimated cost of $2.1 million; and 2. Enter into discussions with El Dorado County, TRPA and the South Lake Tahoe Boys and Girls Club about possible new construction of an indoor athletic complex on the 56-acre parcel site.

Responsible Staff Member: Brian Dossey, Retired Annuitant - Extra Help Reviewed and Approved By: Hilary Roverud, City Manager
Attachments:
01 - Staff Report.docx
02 - March 24, 2026 Staff Report
03 - RFI - Former Recreation Center Use.pdf
04 - Statement of Interest - SLT Boys and Girls Club.pdf 05 - Sagan Design Group - Engineers Letter.pdf
1398
City Council Agenda Report September 8, 2026 Page 1 of 3 City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: September 8, 2026
Title: Request for Interest – Re-Use of Former Recreation and Swim Complex Location: 1180 Rufas Allen Blvd.

Responsible Staff Member: Brian Dossey, Retired Annuitant-Extra Help (530) 542-6000 Hilary Roverud, City Manager (530) 542-6000
Background: At the March 24, 2026 City Council meeting, Council received a report discussing the possible re-use of the former Recreation and Swim Complex (attached document #02 – March 24, 2026 staff report).

During the discussion, City Council directed staff to advertise a “Request for Interest”, to community groups, non-profits organizations, and public that would like to use the former recreation center for recreation related activities for the community.

Issue and Discussion:

Request for Interest
Staff prepared and advertised a Request for Interest (RFI) for use of the former Recreation and Swim Complex (attached document #03 – Request for Interest). Staff reached out to over 20 non-profit groups, organizations, school districts, etc., as well as advertised the RFI on City social media channels, PlanetBids, and newspaper articles in South Tahoe Now and the Tahoe Daily Tribune. Staff also conducted a pre RFI walkthrough of the former Recreation and Swim Complex where three (3) community groups attended. Upon completion of advertising the RFI for thirty-five (35) days, the City received two responses; however, only one response was accepted as complete.

The accepted response from the South Lake Tahoe Boys and Girls Club, stated that they did not wish to use the former Recreation and Swim Complex, but to have the building demolished and discuss possibilities with the City, about having the South Lake Tahoe Boys and Girls Club construct a new indoor recreation facility.

The South Lake Tahoe Boys and Girls Club proposal details a youth indoor training complex with an indoor turf field (i.e. soccer and baseball) and multi-purpose room for club activities (attached document #04 – Statement of Interest from the South Lake Tahoe Boys & Girls Club). The proposal also includes partnerships with other non-profit sports groups.

Former Recreation and Swim Complex
Continuing to operate the former Recreation and Swim Center would pose challenges for not only the City, but for any non-profit group, community group and/or organization. Significant funds and investment are needed to keep the facility operational for continued use. Furthermore, additional capital will be necessary to meet ADA requirements, abate hazardous materials, update plumbing, heating and mechanical systems, and for tenant improvements (see Financial Implications below and attached documents 2 & 3 for associated costs to 1399
City Council Agenda Report September 8, 2026 Page 2 of 3 maintain and upgrade the Former Recreation and Swim Complex). Also, in 2023, an engineer’s report stated that one of the glulam beams above the gymnasium was structurally compromised and could pose occupancy issues if snow loads are not managed during heavy snow seasons (attached document #05 – Sagan Design Group, Engineer’s report).

Upon conclusion of the RFI walkthrough of the former Recreation and Swim Complex, potential user groups concluded that the existing facility would not fit their organization’s needs and was in all likelihood too costly to maintain and/or make upgrades.

Additionally, the City incurs monthly maintenance costs while the former Recreation and Swim Complex remains empty and unused. Also, since the closure of the former Recreation and Swim Complex the facility has become a nuisance with break ins, homelessness and general blight. Therefore, due to the annual maintenance costs and funds required to make capital improvements, and that there was no interest from the community in re-using the former Recreation and Swin Complex, staff recommends adding the former Recreation and Swim Complex for demolition to the FY2026-26 Capital Improvement Program project list.

Request Discussion with El Dorado County and TRPA
Under the current 56-Acre Property agreement with the El Dorado County, provision 2b states that the City shall demolish the former Recreation and Swim Complex within 15 years of the effective date (2022) of the agreement. However, section 5.4, states that upon demolition of the former Recreation and Swim Complex, each party may enter into good faith negotiations to address re-use of the site (attached document #02 - March 24, 2026 Staff Report – 56 Acre Parcel Agreement).

Under the permit with the TRPA, section 8 states that any proposed future use of the former Recreation and Swim Complex center building is contingent upon review and approval of the TRPA Change in Operation application (attached document #02 - March 24, 2026 Staff Report – TRPA Permit). Also, the City received confirmation from the TRPA that there is sufficient banked coverage that may support a new recreation/sports facility.

The above agreement and permit language allows for conversations and discussions to take place over the reuse of the former Recreation and Swim Complex site. Staff is seeking City Council direction to enter into conversations with El Dorado County and TRPA over re-use for the former Recreation and Swim Complex site.

Financial Implications: Keeping the existing Recreation and Swim Complex open and operational on an annual basis is estimated to cost $606,900 (attached document #03 – Request for Interest – Exhibit A). This cost has been slightly revised from the March 24, 2026, Staff Report due to additional research and findings. If the facility were to be kept open for more than a few years, major repairs would be needed to the roof, mechanical systems, upgrades to interior/exterior finishes, ADA upgrades and hazard remediation estimated at $15.8 million (attached document #03 – Request for Interest – Exhibit B). This cost has been revised from the March 24, 2026, Staff Report due to additional research and findings.

The estimated demolition costs for the former Recreation and Swim complex is $2.1 million.

The ongoing maintenance costs for having the building remain unoccupied are approximately $20,000 per month. It is anticipated that these costs will increase during the winter months for snow removal and utility usage. Costs include staff time, supplies and services (i.e. system inspections and facility/parking lot walkthroughs, landscape clean up, utilities, pool chemicals, snow removal (winter), pest control, etc.). 1400
City Council Agenda Report September 8, 2026 Page 3 of 3 Environmental Considerations: Maintaining the former Recreation and Swim Complex in operation in the short term is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines 15301 (Existing Facilities). However, keeping it in operation indefinitely likely would require an update to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 56 Acres Master Plan, adopted by City Council on January 18, 2022.

Demolition of the former Recreation and Swim Complex is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because it is considered a ministerial act requiring a City issued permit.

If a new recreational facility were to be constructed at the former site of the Former Recreation and Swim Complex, it would be subject to an environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).

Policy Implications: Consideration of a new recreation facility on the former Recreation and Swim Complex site is in alignment with Strategic Priority 2 – Recreation and Equitable Access. A new indoor sports/athletic complex would be an asset to the community by providing a space for youth and athletic groups to train and compete. This use could also have a positive impact on Strategic Priority 4 – Economic Development - through visitors traveling to South Lake Tahoe for league and tournament play. 1401
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Title: Possible Re-Use of Recreation and Swim Complex
Location: 1180 Rufus Allen Blvd.

Responsible Staff Members: Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager (530) 542-6000 Heather Stroud, City Attorney (530) 542-6046
Background: At the City Council meeting on January 27, 2026, Councilmember Jinkens (seconded by Councilmember Roberts) requested that an item be brought back at a future meeting to discuss potential re-use of the Recreation and Swim Complex and creation of an adhoc subcommittee to discuss this possibility with El Dorado County.

On August 20, 2019, City Council received a report regarding the history of decisions regarding the new recreation center project including previous analysis regarding renovation and expansion of the existing facility, originally built in 1975, versus building a new facility. City Council considered a draft Existing Conditions Assessment prepared by architect Williams + Paddon in 2016. At that meeting, City Council directed staff to order a more detailed conditions assessment report, which was prepared by Perkins & Will and presented to City Council on February 11, 2020.

This condition assessment is included in the agenda packet. It found that the building is structurally sound but that mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems had exceeded their life span and were in need of replacement. The condition assessment also identified areas of noncompliance with ADA accessibility codes, which would be required to be brought into compliance with the needed renovations. Additionally, the condition assessment included a hazardous materials assessment which identified the existence of asbestos and lead that would need to be remediated if renovations are made. Based on the assessment, which estimated that renovation of the existing facility would be nearly equivalent to the cost to build a new facility, City Council directed staff to continue with planning and design of the new recreation center on the location where it has been constructed.

During this time, staff was also negotiating the 56 Acres Agreement with El Dorado County, which City Council and the County Board of Supervisors both approved on January 18, 2022. This agreement included a property swap resulting in City ownership of the location where the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center is located and County ownership of the property where the existing Recreation and Swim Complex is located. The property swap was completed in July 2022 so that construction on the new facility could begin. At that time, in implementation of the 56 Acres Agreement, the City and County entered into a 50-year Ground Lease for the City to lease from the County certain County-owned property on the 56 Acres including the existing Recreation and Swim Complex site. Section 2.1 of the Ground Lease gives the City the “sole authority over the development, operation and use of the Leased Property” and 1402
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 3
“the sole responsibility for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of all existing and new improvements on the Leased Property.” Section 1.2 of the Ground Lease requires the City to demolish the existing recreation center upon completion of the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center pursuant to the terms of the 56 Acres Agreement, Section 2(b) of which requires that demolition to occur at the City’s sole expense and to the County’s satisfaction no later than February 22, 2037. There is a deed restriction on the Leased Property that it “shall be used solely and exclusively for public use” and prohibiting “[p]rivate residential, commercial, or industrial uses.” Concurrently with the approval of the 56 Acres Agreement, on January 18, 2022, the City Council approved the 56 Acres Master Plan after a multi-year public process. The 56 Acres Master Plan and its associated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration analyzed the project to include demolition of the existing Recreation and Swim Complex and the Master Plan shows that area as undeveloped green space.

The new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center required a permit from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA). Special Condition 8 of the TRPA permit, issued on April 28, 2022, requires that prior to opening the new facility, the City “shall discontinue all use of the existing swim and recreation center,” and requires that “[a]ny proposed future use of the existing swim and recreation center building is contingent upon review and approval of a TRPA Change in Operation application.” This condition resulted in a lower mobility mitigation fee ($16,197.40) than would have otherwise been due if both facilities were to remain open. Special Condition F of the TRPA permit requires the City to mitigate a portion or all of the 102,651 square feet of excess land coverage by either removing coverage within Hydrologic Transfer Area 4 – South Stateline or by submitting an excess coverage mitigation fee. Demolishing the 34,000-square-foot Recreation and Swim Complex would count towards this mitigation.

Issue and Discussion: There are some significant challenges to maintaining the existing Recreation and Swim Complex in operation after the opening of the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center. First, based on prior City Council decisions, staff has been working towards decommissioning and demolition of the Recreation and Swim Complex.

Significant funds would be needed to keep the facility open and operational for continued use.

Annual maintenance is about $391,000, and annual utility costs are approximately $180,000.

Even without keeping the pool in operation and only having the meeting rooms and gymnasium space available for rent by community groups, these ongoing costs would be substantial.

Additionally, the facility has been compromised by its age and snow loading, and has significant deferred maintenance in major building systems that would need to be addressed to keep it operational at an estimated cost of $204,000 per year. To keep the facility open for more than a couple of years, major repairs would be needed, to include a roof reinforcement/replacement estimated at $3,400,000, additional exterior hardening (windows, doors, paint, and siding to be replaced with fire resistant material) at $3,400,000, and if the pool were to continue in use, $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 is likely to be needed to demo and rebuild the area and replace the mechanical systems. Thus, even without the major repairs, the estimated annual cost to keep the Recreation and Swim Center open is $775,000. By comparison, the planned demolition is estimated at a one-time cost of $2,100,000.

Second, a TRPA Change in Operation permit would be needed to continue use of the existing Recreation and Swim Complex. It is likely that this change would trigger additional mobility mitigation fees, at an unknown cost to the City.
1403
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 3
Third, the County required demolition of the existing Recreation and Swim Complex by 2037 as a condition of the 56 Acres Agreement. Keeping the facility in operation beyond that date would require renegotiating and amending the agreement with the County.

Under current regulatory approvals and agreements, the City Council could direct staff to explore the feasibility of keeping the existing Recreation and Swim complex operational and available for lease by community groups in the short term. The estimated annual cost to keep the building operational, however, is $775,000, and if the building is open for more than a few years major repairs will be needed that are estimated to cost $6,800,000 (excluding the pool repairs). If City Council desires to keep the facility in operation, staff recommends passing on these costs to the lessee(s) because these costs are not covered by the current City budget. It is uncertain that local community groups would be interested in leasing this space at full cost recovery, so this may not be a feasible option.

It is important to note that space is available for non-profit groups at the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center at the City Council-approved fee of $18.75/hour for meeting rooms and $41.25/hour for the community room. Meeting rooms are available for senior services meetings at no charge. The community room is also available to youth organizations for $15/hour and for senior services meetings and youth sports organizations at no charge.

Financial Implications: Keeping the existing Recreation and Swim Center open and operational is estimated to cost $775,000 per year. If the facility were to be kept open for more than a few years, major repairs would be needed to the roof and exterior, estimated at $6,800,000. Further, the required TRPA Change in Operation permit may trigger additional mobility mitigation fees in addition to the $16,197.40 already paid, in an amount unknown at this time, and not demolishing the existing Recreation and Swim Center would require the City to find an additional 34,000 square feet of coverage to retire or pay an additional coverage mitigation fee of $289,000 (8.50 x. 34,000 sq. ft.). By contrast, the planned demolition of the facility is estimated at $2,100,000.

Environmental Considerations: Maintaining the current Recreation and Swim Complex in operation in the short term is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines 15301 (Existing Facilities). However, keeping it in operation indefinitely likely would require an update to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 56 Acres Master Plan, adopted by City Council on January 18, 2022.

Policy Implications: 2025-2030 Strategic Plan Action 7.1 states “Complete the new Recreation and Swim Complex and maintain the current complex in the meantime.” Staff has accomplished this goal. Keeping the current complex in operation after completion of the new facility is beyond the scope of the current strategic plan. 1404

AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF THE 56-ACRE PROPERTY
THIS AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE 56-ACRE PROPERTY (''Agreement'’) dated as of this a&day of Fe,b ruar,v 2022, the last day of execution (the -Effective Date"), is entered into by and between the CIT’Y OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a municipal corporation (-'City’'). and EL DORADO COUNTY. a political subdivision of the State of California (“County’'). The City and County may each be referred to as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties.

RECITALS
The following Recitals are a substantive part of this Agreement:

A. The City owns approximately 15 acres of property in the City of South Lake Tahoe. also known as Assessor's Parcel Number 026-050-004 (the '-Original City Property’').

The Original City Property is a portion of an overall property known as the 56-Acres. The County owns the other approximately 41 acres of property that make up the 56-Acres, also known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 026-050-003, 026-050-005. and 026-050-006 (the ''Original County Property“). The Original City Property was conveyed to the City by County by Grant Deed dated April 1 7, 1973. and recorded in the Official Records of El Dorado County on April 23. 1 973 ("Grant Deed-'). The Grant Deed includes certain terms regarding the City's use of the Original City Property. including that the property be used for public park. recreation, cultural and visitor services. The Original City Property and the Original County Property may hereinafter be referred to as the "56-Acre Property." which is depicted in Exhibit A, Site Map, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

B. The City and County currently utilize the 56-Acre Property for both City and County facilities, including a public beach. campground, senior center and senior nutrition program. ice arena. library, and vector control facilities. In addition, the City has leased portions of the 56-Acre Property to community groups and public agencies for visitor, art and emergency medical services purposes.

C. County and City have entered into various agreements over the last few decades to provide for the County's lease of the entire portion of the Original County Property to City and the construction of various facilities on the County Property. The original Lease of Real Property between the County and City was dated July 1, 1 968, and thereafter replaced with a new lease and series of amendments as follows: (1 ) Lease of Real Property between the County and City dated December 12. 1972; (2) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated December 9, 1986; (3) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated April 14. 1987; (5) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated January 26, 20 10; (4) Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of El Dorado and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Construction of the El Dorado Beach Improvement Project in the South Lake Tahoe Recreational Area ("Beach Improvement MOU”);and (5) Amendment 1 to the Beach Improvement MOU dated April 17. 2014 " (collectively, the ''Original 56-Acre Agreements"). In addition, the City and County entered 1 C. –c,c> ? - MaD\ 1405
into a Facility Use Agreement, dated February 15, 20 ]2 for the County's use of a portion of the City's leased property (collectively, the "Existing Use Agreement”).

D. The City has subleased certain portions of the Original County Property pursuant to the following lease agreements: (1) Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the South Lake Chamber of Commerce dated April 4, 2006; and (2) a Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the Tahoe Art League dated May 7, 2012 (-County Property Subleases”). In addition, City has entered into a Sublease Agreement between the California Tahoe Emergency Services Operations Authority, dated February 1 1 , 2020 (“EMS Sublease’').

E. The City and County desire to work collaboratively to maximize the public benefits from the 56-Acre Property, update previous planning efforts and enable the provision of the highest quality recreation and government facilities and services on the 56-Acre Property.

F. The 56-Acre Property is anticipated to become the identifiable recreation and government center of the South Lake Tahoe, with the development of the site as a park-like campus with plentiful recreation facilities. the centralization of City government facilities and services and a "downtown“ environment centered on the 56-Acre Property and neighboring Harrison Avenue commercial district.

G. The City and County have worked collaboratively to identify future public improvements on the 56-Acre Property and negotiate terms for a new agreement for the 56-Acre Property to replace the Original 56- Acre Agreements.

H. The California Tahoe Conservancy has provided grant funding for the development of the 56-Acre Property and has expressed support for this Agreement.

I. On January 14. 2020. the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe and the Board of Supervisors of the County of El Dorado adopted similar resolutions, Resolution 2020- 006. and Resolution 007-2020 respectively, Outlining Proposed Terms for a New Agreement between El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of Recreation and Government Facilities on the ''56-Acres’' (''56-Acre Terms Resolution").

J. The City has prepared a Master Plan for the 56-Acre Property (''Master Plan’'), which includes, among other things, a new Multi-Generational Recreation/Swim/Senior Center Facility (the ''New Multi-Generational Center“). a depiction of which is shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

K. City and County have also agreed to exchange certain real property located on the 56-Acre Property to effectuate its development and to lease certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with the Master Plan. The subject property is exempt surplus property under the Surplus Lands Act, Government Code section 54220 et seq., and implementing guidelines as the transferring agency’s property is being exchanged for other property necessary for the transferring agency's use and is being transferred to another local agency for the transferee's use.
9 1406
L. In connection with consideration of the Master Plan and this Agreement. the City completed review under the California Environmental Quality Act (''CEQA”) and prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration.

M. On January 1 8, 2022. the City Council approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Master Plan.

N. City and County desire to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the 56- Acre Terms Resolution and subsequent negotiations in order to set forth the terms and conditions. among other things relating to (1 ) the amendment and restatement of the Original 56- Acre Agreements; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with the Master Plan; and (4) County's use of certain portions of the 56- Acre Property.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, City and County hereby agree as follows:

1. RE PRES ENTAT IONS AND WARRANTIES / TERM P

1.1 Representations and Warranties.
(a) City Representations. City represents and warrants to County as follows:
(i) Authority. City is a municipal corporation of the State of California. City has full right, power and lawful authority to perform its obligations hereunder and the execution, performance and delivery of this Agreement by City has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of City.
(ii) No Conflict. City's execution. delivery and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or a breach under any contract. agreement or order to which City is a party or by which it is bound. ( 111) Ownership of Property. City is the owner of the Original City Property.
(iv) No Litigation or Other Proceeding. To City's current actual knowledge, no litigation or other proceeding (whether administrative or otherwise) is outstanding or has been threatened which would prevent, hinder or delay the ability of City to perform its obligations under this Agreement.

Until the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. City shall, upon learning of any fact or condition which would cause any of the warranties and representations in this Section (a) not to be true. immediately give written Notice of such fact or condition to County.
3 1407
(b) County’s Representations. County represents and warrants to City as follows:
(i) Authority. County is a political subdivision of the State of California. County has full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all of its obligations hereunder and the execution, performance and delivery of this Agreement by County has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of County. (ii) No Conflict. County's execution, delivery and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or a breach under any contract, agreement or order to which County is a party or by which it is bound. (111) Ownership of Property. County is the owner of the Original County Property.
(iv) No Litigation or Other Proceeding. To County’s current actual knowledge, no litigation or other proceeding (whether administrative or otherwise) is outstanding or has been threatened which would prevent. hinder or delay the ability of County to perform its obligations under this Agreement.

Until the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, County shall, upon learning of any fact or condition which would cause any of the warranties and representations in this Section (b) not to be true, immediately give written Notice of such fact or condition to City. 1 .2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be fifty (50) years from the effective date of the Lease described in Section 3.1 below, unless and until earlier terminated as provided herein (''Initial Term"). The Agreement shall be automatically extended on an annual basis up to a total of ninety-nine (99) years, unless either Party notifies the other Party no later than sixty days prior to the end of the Initial Term, or the then-current term. of a Default (as defined in Section 7.2 below) under this Agreement. If the defaulting Party does not cure the Default as provided herein, the other Party may terminate this Agreement. The Initial Term in addition to any automatic extensions pursuant to this Section 1 .2 shall be referred to as the -'Term.

2. PROPERTY EXCHANGE.

2.1 Exchange of Property Interests. City and County have determined that the transfer of the property interests as provided herein will further a governmental purpose by facilitating development of the 56-Acre Property as provided in this Agreement. County will transfer certain real property concurrently with execution of the Lease at the Closing, and City and County will transfer other parcels after certain demolition work is performed. as provided in more detail below.
(a) Concurrently with execution of the Lease, County agrees to transfer to City that approximately 9.1 acres of the Original County Property to be used for the purpose of development and construction of the New Multi-Generational Center, civic center, and parking lot (collectively the "New Multi-Generational Center Site’') and grants an easement over approximately 4.8 acres of the Original County Property and Existing Recreation Center Site to be used as a right-oGway. as shown in Attachment 1 to Exhibit C. attached hereto and 4 1408
incorporated herein by this reference, and referred to therein as "City of South Lake Tahoe Proposed Parcel 3-' and “Roadway & Utility Easement” (collectively. the -City Transfer Property"). In the event, all or a portion of the City Transfer Property is not developed within fifteen (15) years of the Effective Date consistent with the Master Plan, City shall transfer title and ownership of that portion of the City Transfer Property not developed as provided herein back to the County and the Lease shall be amended to incorporate such property to the Leased Property. The City Transfer Property shall be conveyed pursuant a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, which provides that title to the City Transfer Property shall revert to the County in the event that City no longer uses the City Transfer Property for public use ('-City Transfer Property Grant Deed’').
(b) Concurrently with execution of the Lease, City agrees to transfer to County that approximately 1 1 .45 acres of the Original City Property where the existing Recreation Center, excluding the ice arena, is located, as shown in Attachment I to Exhibit D, and referred to therein as ''EI Dorado County Proposed Parcel 5“ and "City of South Lake Tahoe to El Dorado County Transfer Parcel", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (collectively, the "Existing Recreation Center Site’'). The Existing Recreation Site shall be conveyed to County pursuant to a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, which provides that title to the Existing Recreation Center Site shall revert to the City in the event that County no longer uses the Existing Recreation Center Site for public use ("Existing Recreation Site Grant Deed’'). The Existing Recreation Center Site shall also be included in the Leased Property. City shall continue to operate the existing facilities on the Existing Recreation Center Site until completion of the New Multi-Generational Center, at which time City shall, at its sole cost and expense. vacate, abandon, and demolish, including removal of all Hazardous Materials, as defined in Section 5.2(b) below, the existing Recreation Center facility, in accordance with all Governmental Requirements to the satisfaction of the County ("Demolition of Existing Recreation Center Facility-). The Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facility shall be completed within fifteen (15) years of the Effective Date. Upon the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Facility, City shall provide Notice to County. County shall review such Notice and may either accept completion of the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facility or provide Notice to City of such work that remains to be completed. (c) County agrees to transfer to City that approximately one acre of the Original County Property that is currently being used for a vector control facility ("Vector Control Facility"), as set forth in Attachment 1 to Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Vector Control Property’') within thirty (30) days of City's acceptance of the Demolition of the Vector Control Facility. as defined in Section 5.2(b). The Vector Control Property shall be conveyed pursuant a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E. which provides that title to the Vector Control Property shall revert to the County in the event that City no longer uses the Vector Control Property for public use ("Vector Control Grant Deed"). Upon transfer of the Vector Control Property to City, the Vector Control Property shall be the sole responsibility of City.

2.2 As-Is Transfer. City and County specifically acknowledge that the City Transfer Property. the Existing Recreational Center Site and the Vector Control Property (collectively, the "Transfer Properties") being exchanged pursuant to the terms of this Agreement are being accepted by the transferee agency on an -AS IS WITH ALL FAULTS" basis and that neither 5 1409
party is relying on any representations or warranties of any kind whatsoever, expressed or implied, from the other as to any matters concerning the properties. including without limitation :
their physical condition; geology; the development potential of the properties and their use. habitability, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose; their zoning or other legal status:
compliance with law; the presence or removal of hazardous or toxic materials, substances, or wastes on, under or about the properties or any neighboring property.

2.3 Amendment to Grant Deed. In order to provide consistent restrictions among the various property deeds on the 56-Acre Property and remove restrictions that are no longer applicable. the Parties shall amend a prior Grant from County to City to modify the restrictive covenants. The Amendment to Grant Deed shall be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G ("Amendment to Grant Deed“).

2.4 Covenants. Prior to the transfer of the City Transfer Property and Vector Control Property. as applicable, County will not enter into any contract or lease or convey any real property interest. including easements, affecting the City Transfer Property or the Vector Control Property, as applicable. without City's written consent. Prior to the transfer of the Existing Recreation Center Site, City will not enter into any contract or lease or convey any real property interest, including easements, affecting the Existing Recreation Center Site, without County's wrItten consent.

3. LEASE OF CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE COUNTY PROPERTY,

3.1 Lease. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. County shall lease to City and City shall ground lease from County the Leased Property, as defined below. The ground lease for the Property shall be in the form of the Ground Lease attached hereto as Exhibit E. subject to such minor revisions as may be approved by City and County (the "Lease"). City acknowledges and agrees that the Leased Property shall be used for purposes of development of governmental, recreation and community facilities to serve the community. with primary emphasis on recreation. as set forth in more detail in the Lease. Further. the Parties acknowledge that all structures and improvements on the Leased Property as of the date of the Lease are and shall be the sole property of the City and the City shall be responsible for all maintenance costs, as set forth in more detail in the Lease.

3.2 Leased Property. Prior to the Closing. the City and County shall process changes to the boundaries of the Original City Property and the Original County Property in order for the property lines to more accurately align with existing and planned facilities and structures, as shown on the Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Original County Property. as modified herein shall be referred to as the '-Leased Property." The Original City Property, as modified herein shall be referred to as the "City Property. (a) The City shall process a lot-line adjustment to modify the boundaries of the Original City Property and the Original County Property and adjust the lot-line so no structure is located on the lot line.
(b) The City shall process a Parcel Map to create a separate parcel for the real property on which the El Dorado County Library facility is located ("County Library 6 1410
Property") and the parties acknowledge that the real property subject to the EMS Sublease (''ENIS Property’') is excluded from the Leased Property. Both the County Library Property and the EMS Property shall be retained by County and shall not be included in the Leased Property or subject to the terms of the Lease. City covenants that, as of the Effective Date, the City has completed lead. mold, and asbestos remediation and roof replacement on the EMS Property, and the County's ambulance service provider has initiated a major renovation project on the EMS Property, such that the City is not aware of outstanding maintenance or repair issues associated with the EMS Property. Prior to the Closing, City and County shall negotiate the termination of the existing EMS Sublease in order for County to have direct control and authority for the EMS Property and its use. City shall continue to be responsible for snow removal on the EMS Property and will assist with securing land coverage for the ambulance housing project as required by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, including but not limited to the transfer of not less than 50 square feet of City held land coverage for the project. Upon completion of the New Multi-Generational Center, the City shall be responsible for snow removal on County Library Property, which obligation shall be documented in the use agreement between the City and County for the New Multi-Generational Center as provided in Section

5.3(b) below.

3.3 Lease Rent Payments. Payments of rent for the Leased Property shall be as provided in the Lease, which provides for City to pay: (a) 50 percent (50%) of net operating profits from all existing and future revenue sources generated in the 56-Acre Property. excluding the ice arena, after the City sets aside fees from the campground on the 56- Acre Property and two percent (2%) of the total asset value of the facilities on the 56-Acre Property into a repair and replacement funds to be managed by the City; and (b) an amount equal to $200,000 (increased annually from the Effective Date) in year 30 of the Lease or retirement of debt for the New Multi-Generational Center, all as set forth in more detail in the Lease (the "Lease Rent'-).

As set forth in the Lease, County agrees to use all Lease Rent received for County infrastructure initiatives and services in the Tahoe Basin area of El Dorado County, including. but not limited to. roads, trails, facilities, and utilities.

3.4 County Property Subleases. The existing County Property Subleases shall remain in full force and effect under this Agreement and the Lease, as set forth in more detail therein. City shall also have authority to enter into further subleases consistent with the terms of the Lease.

3.5 Extension of County Lease Agreements. The County Lease Agreements are hereby extended and remain in full force and effect until the date the Lease is fully executed and effective.

3.6 Termination of Original 56-Acre Agreements. Upon full execution of the Lease, the Original 56-Acre Agreements shall be terminated and of no further force and effect.

4. CLOSING.

4.1 Title Review. Each Party may request title reports for the various parcels that comprise the 56-Acre Property and may work with a title company, at its sole cost and expense. to purchase title insurance for any property being accepted by such party prior to acceptance. In 7 1411
the event there are any exceptions on title to any property required to be transferred herein that impact the transferee's ability to develop the property consistent with the terms of this Agreement, the Parties shall coordinate to remove such title exceptions prior to transfer.

4.2 Execution and Recordation of Lease, City Transfer Grant Deed and Amendment to Grant Deed. Within five business days of the satisfaction of the City and County Conditions Precedent to Closing, the City and County shall execute the Lease and the Amendment to Grant Deed and shall have the Lease or a Memorandum of Lease recorded against the Leased Property and the Amended Grant Deed recorded (''Closing").

4.3 City’s Conditions Precedent to Closing. City's obligation to proceed with the Lease is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by City of each and all of the conditions precedent described below (''City Conditions Precedent to Closing”). City’s Conditions Precedent to Lease are solely for the benefit of City and shall be fulfilled or waived within the time periods provided for herein :
(a) No Default. County shall not be in Default under this Agreement and no event shall have occurred which with the passage of time or giving of notice or both would constitute a default hereunder.
(b) Leased Property. City and County shall have adjusted the property lines of the Original City Property and the Original County Property as provided in Section 3.2.

Exhibit F.
(C) Lease. County shall have executed the Lease in the form attached as (d) Grant Deeds. County shall have executed the City Transfer Property Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit C.
(e) Amendment to Grant Deed. County shall have executed the Amendment to Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit G. (f) CEQA. No legal challenge has been fIled under CEQA within the applicable time period.

4.4 County’s Conditions Precedent to Closing. County's obligation to proceed with the Lease is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by County of each and all of the conditions precedent described below (“County Conditions Precedent to Closing"). which are solely for the benefit of County, and which shall be fulfilled or waived within the time periods provided for herein
(a) No Default by City. City shall not be in Default under this Agreement. and no event shall have occurred which with the passage of time or giving of notice or both would constitute a default hereunder.
(b) Leased Property. City and County shall have adjusted the property lines of the Original City Property and the Original County Property as provided in Section 3.2. 8 1412
(C) Lease. City shall have executed the Lease in the form attached as Exhibit F.
(d) Grant Deed. City shall have executed a Certificate of Acceptance to the City Transfer Property Grant Deed.
(e) Amendment to Grant Deed. City shall have executed the Amendment to Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit G.
(f) CEQA. No legal challenge has been filed under CEQA within the applicable time period.
5 DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE 56-ACRES.

5.1 City Development. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, City shall have the sole authority over the development, operation and use of the 56-Acre Property. including without limitation. the Leased Property. and may determine, in its sole and absolute discretion. the type and nature of any and all improvements to be located on the 56-Acre Property, subject to the use requirements set forth in Section 6.1 below. The City authority described herein shall include the sole responsibility for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of all existing and new improvements on the 56-Acre Property, subject to the exceptions set forth in Section 5.2 below. County and City staff will work cooperatively in the development, construction, operation and maintenance of the 56-Acre Property.

5.2 Exceptions to City Authority and Responsibility. The following are the only exceptions to the City's sole authority and responsibility over the 56-Acre Property:
(a) County shall retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the EMS Property and the County Library Property, which is not included in the Leased Property and shall not be subject to the terms of the Lease, and all improvements and facilities located thereon
(b) County shall vacate, abandon, and demolish, including removal of all Hazardous Materials, as defined below. the Vector Control Facility, in accordance with all Governmental Requirements to the satisfaction of the City (''Demolition of Vector Control Facility’'). The Demolition of the Vector Control Facility shall be completed no later than fifteen (15) years after the Effective Date. Demolition of the Vector Control Facility is expressly contingent upon finding approximately one (1 ) acre of improved City-owned real property that County determines, in its reasonable discretion, is a suitable site for a new vector control facility ("New Vector Control Site"), which shall be transferred by City to County at no cost with full coverage credits. In the event that City and County have not agreed upon the New Vector Control Site within thirteen (13) years of the Effective Date. City and County shall meet and confer to ensure that an agreement is reached as to a reasonable site within the 15-year timeframe set forth herein. Upon the Demolition of the Vector Control Facility. County shall provide Notice to City. City shall review such Notice and may either accept completion of the Demolition of the Vector Control or provide Notice to County of such work that remains to be completed. The Vector Control Property shall be transferred to City as provided in Section

2.1 (c). “Hazardous Materials ’' means any substance, material. or waste which is or becomes 9 1413
regulated by any local governmental authority, the State of California, or the United States Government, including any material or substance which is: (i) defined as a ''hazardous waste, "extremejy hazardous waste," or ''restricted hazardous waste” under Sections 251 15, 25117 or 25122.7, or listed pursuant to Section 25140 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5 (Hazardous Waste Control Law); (ii) defined as a "hazardous substance" under Section 2531 6 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.8 (Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act); (iii) defined as a "hazardous material,” ''hazardous substance.’' or ''hazardous waste“ under Section 25501 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95 (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory); (iv) defined as a ''hazardous substance’' under Section 25281 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.7 (Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances); (v) petroleum; (vi) friable asbestos; (vii) polychlorinated biphenyls; (viii) listed under Article 9 or defined as “hazardous’' or ''extremely hazardous” pursuant to Article 1 1 of Title 22 of the California Administrative Code. Division 4, Chapter 20; (ix) designated as "hazardous substances’' pursuant to Section 31 1 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. $ 131 7); (x) defined as a ''hazardous waste" pursuant to Section 1 004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. 42 U.S.C. $690 1. et sea. (42 U.S.C. $6903); or (xi) defined as ''hazardous substances’' pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation. and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §9601 , el seq.. as the foregoing statutes and regulations now exist or may hereafter be amended.
(c) Each Party shall be responsible for any and all costs associated with environmental remediation or Hazardous Materials on the real property. facilities or structures on the 56-Acre Property that it owns as of the Effective Date. Each Party shall be responsible for conducting Phase 1 investigations and testing upon undertaking any project on its real property. (d) City shall provide a location for the County's senior nutrition programs in existing or new City facilities located on the 56-Acre Property pursuant to the terms of a use agreement to be entered into between the Parties. County's programs and the operating costs associated with the programs shall be the sole responsibility of County.

5.3 Multi-Generational Center. The City shall endeavor to construct the New Multi-Generational Center on the 56-Acre Property as described in the Master Plan, subject to the following requirements:
(a) City shall be responsible for all design and construction costs associated with the New Multi-Generational Center and shall own and operate the New Multi-Generational Center
(b) The City shall allocate approximately 9,000 square feet of space in the New Multi-Generational Center for the purpose of providing older adult services and programs.

The space shall include a commercial kitchen and dining room for the purpose of accommodating the County Senior Nutrition Program and allowing shared use with the City.

County's use shall be documented in a separate use agreement between the Parties. The use agreement shall also include provisions providing for City's obligation to be responsible for snow removal on County Library Property upon completion of the New Multi-Generational Center. The City shall manage the space in order to maximize the use of all elements in the New 10 1414
Multi-Generational Center for programs that benefit all user groups in the community. As part of the annual review set forth in Section 7.1 below, the Parties shall discuss programs and priorities of use in the New Multi-Generational Center, including City's commitment to serving seniors in the New Multi-Generational Center and allocation of staff or resources dedicated to older adult services and programs coordination.
(c) City shall be responsible for all Maintenance Costs, as defined below, associated with the New Multi-Generational Center and County shall be responsible for the Operating Costs. as defined below, of its programs and use of the New Multi-Generational Center. City and County shall share the Replacement Costs, as defined below, based on each Party's proportionate use of the facilities. The cost allocations provided herein shall be documented in the County and City use agreement described in Section 5.3(b) above. (i) "Operating Costs“ shall include costs to operate the County senior nutrition programs, including staff costs, costs to fund all programming, and cleaning of the commercial kitchen and dining room after County use.
(ii) -Maintenance Costs" shall include costs to maintain the building, parking area, hardscape, sidewalks, landscaping, and any equipment attached to the building whose removal would do harm to the structure, such as the foundation. roof, ventilation, plumbing, electrical, fire suppression, heating, and windows. (iii) "Replacement Costs" shall include replacement of any equipment or appliances in the commercial kitchen and dining facilities. (d) The existing Senior Center facility shall remain in operation until the completion of the New Multi-Generational Center. Upon completion of the New MultiGenerational Center, County. at its option, may elect to continue providing older adult services program at the existing Senior Center facility pursuant to the terms of the Lease.

5.4 Development of Existing Recreation Center Site. Upon completion of the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facit ity, either Party may request that this Agreement be re-opened for good faith negotiations between the Parties to address redevelopment and re-use of the Existing Recreation Center Site. The Parties agree and acknowledge that it is anticipated the Existing Recreation Center Site will be developed as a government facility for shared use between County and City.

5.5 Historical Structures. In a manner consistent with the Master Plan, the City shall endeavor to adequately preserve all historically-significant buildings currently located on the 56-Acre Property and to locate and design any new recreational or government facilities in a manner that is complementary to the historically-significant buildings as identified in the Master Plan

5.6 City Leases. The City shall have sole discretion over leases of the City Property, including without limitation, the extension or termination of such leases, provided however that any and all leases between the City and a third party shall be in compliance with the general use guidelines set forth in this Agreement. With respect to the Leased Property, City shall have the right to maintain any subleases in effect as of the Effective Date and to sublease the Leased 11 1415
Property to any other government entity or local community non-profit. Any other subleases of the L.eased Property require County’s prior approval.

5.7 Compliance with Laws; Indemnity and Waiver. Both City and County shall carry out all work and development under this Agreement. including County's demolition of the Vector Control Facility and City-s development on the 56-Acre Property, in conformity with all applicable laws. ordinances, statutes. codes, rules. regulations, orders and decrees, of the United States, the State of California, the County of El Dorado. the City. and of any other political subdivision or instrumentality exercising jurisdiction over the 56-Acre Property (collectively, the "Governmental Requirements"). including all state labor laws and standards; the County zoning and development standards; building. plumbing. mechanical and electrical codes; all other provisions of the City Municipal Code; and all applicable disabled and handicapped access requirements, including the Americans With Disabilities Act. 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq ..

Government Code Section 4450, et seq .. Government Code Section 1 1135, et seq.. and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code Section 5 1 , et seq. Each Party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Party and its officers, employees. volunteers, agents and representatives from and against any and all present and future liabilities. obligations, orders, claims, damages, fines, penalties and expenses. including attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of or in any way connected with the first Party's failure to comply with all Governmental Requirements.

6. USE REQUIREMENTS.

6.1 Governmental Community Use. The City shall develop, operate and maintain the 56-Acre Property, except as set forth in Section 5.2 above, for recreation and government facilities, with primary emphasis on recreation. to serve the residents and visitors of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. In the event City desires to use the 56- Acre Property for any use other than set forth in this Section 6.1. City may submit a written request for a use exception to the County. County shall consider such request in its reasonable discretion and respond in writing to City within 30 days of receipt of the request.

6.2 County Resident Use. ’l'he City shall allow residents of El Dorado County that do not reside within the City limits to use existing and new recreation facilities on the 56-Acre Property under the same policies and fee schedule applicable to City residents.

7. ANNUAL REVIEW, DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES.

7.1 Annual Review. The Parties shall meet at least once a year prior to the anniversary date of the Effective Date to review the status of the terms of the Agreement and to ensure adequate communication and strengthen the relationship between the Parties. Prior to the annual meeting date, each Party shall submit to the other Party an update on its compliance with the terms and obligations of this Agreement.

7.2 Default Remedies. Failure by either Party to perform any action or covenant required by this Agreement within the time periods provided herein following Notice shall constitute a “Default" under this Agreement. A Party claiming a Default shall give written Notice of Default to the other Party specifying the Default complained of. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. the claimant shall not institute any proceeding against the 12 1416
other Party if such Party within 60 days following receipt of such Notice of Default immediately, with due diligence, commences to cure, correct or remedy such failure or delay and completes such cure. correction or remedy with diligence

7.3 Dispute Resolution. In the event that the Party receiving a Notice of Default disputes the allegations or is not intending to cure, correct or remedy the alleged default, the Parties shall promptly meet in an effort to resolve the issues raised. If the Parties fail to resolve the issues raised, mediation may be pursued by mutual agreement. It is the intent of the Parties to the extent possible that litigation be avoided as a method of dispute resolution.

7.4 Institution of Legal Actions. Except as otherwise specitlcally provided herein, upon the occurrence of a Default. the Parties have the right, in addition to any other rights or remedies. to institute any action at law or in equity to cure. correct. prevent or remedy any Default, or to recover damages for any Default. or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. The Parties remedies in the event of a Default shall be limited to obtaining specific performance or injunctive relief. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of El Dorado, State of California. or in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of the State of California. Neither Party shall have the right to recover any consequential. punitive or special damages.

7.5 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual consent of the Parties or upon satisfaction of all terms and obligations set forth herein and not otherwise addressed in the Lease or the Amended Grant Deed.

7.6 Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it. at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party, except as otherwise expressly provided herein

7.7 Inaction Not a Waiver of Default. Any failures or delays by either Party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any Default shall not operate as a waiver of any Default or of any such rights or remedies. or deprive either such Party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect. assert or enforce any such rights or remedies.

8. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

8. 1 No Assignment. The qualifications and identity of the Parties are of particular concern and material considerations for entering into this Agreement. Neither Party shall have the right during the Term to assign all or any portion of its rights, obligations or interests under this Agreement.

8.2 Mutual Indemnity.
(a) County shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to City), protect and hold City and its officers, employees. agents and representatives, harmless from any and all liabilities. obligations, orders. claims, damages, fines. penalties and expenses. 13 1417
including attorneys' fees and costs (“Claims") to the extent caused by any of County’s activities under this Agreement or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by County and whether such Claims shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement.
(b) City shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to County), protect and hold County and its offIcers. employees, agents and representatives. harmless from any and all Claims to the extent caused by any of City-s activities under this Agreement or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by City and whether such Claims shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement.

8.3 Notices, Demands and Communications between the Parties. Any approval, disapproval, demand, document or other notice (-'Notice") which either Party may desire to give to the other Party under this Agreement must be in writing and shall be given by certified mail. return receipt requested and postage prepaid. personal delivery. or reputable overnight courier (but not by facsimile or email), to the Party to whom the Notice is directed at the address of the Party as set forth below, or at any other address as that Party may later designate by Notice.

I-o City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 L.isa Vlaloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joseph D. Irvin. City Manager
Fo County: El Dorado County
Chief Administrative Office
330 Fair Lane
Placerville. CA 95667
Don Ashton. County Chief Administrative Officer
Any Notice shall be deemed received on the date of delivery if delivered by personal service, on the date of delivery or refused delivery as shown by the return receipt if sent by certified mail, and on the date of delivery or refused delivery as shown by the records of the overnight courier if sent via nationally recognized overnight courier. Notices sent by a Party's attorney on behalf of such Party shall be deemed delivered by such Party.

8.4 Enforced Delay; Extension of Times of Performance. Subject to the limitations set forth below, performance by either Party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in Default. and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where delays are due to: war; insurrection; strikes; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; mres; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions: freight embargoes; governmental restrictions or priority; litigation, including court delays; or unusually severe weather; acts or omissions of the other Party. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if Notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other Party within 30 days of the commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of City and County. 14 1418

8.5 Relationship between City and County. It is hereby acknowledged that the relationship between City and County is not that of a joint venture and that City and County shall not be deemed or construed for any purpose to be the agent of the other.

8.6 Approvals and Actions. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by either Party, the City Manager of City or County Chief Administrative Officer of County, as applicable, or his or her designee is authorized to act on behalf of such Party, unless specifically provided otherwise or the context requires otherwise.

8.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

8.8 Integration. This Agreement, including the exhibits hereto, contain the entire understanding between the Parties relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

Each Party is entering this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each Party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such Party deems material.

8.9 Titles and Captions. Titles and captions are for convenience of reference only and do not defIne, describe or limit the scope or the intent of this Agreement or of any of its terms. References to section numbers are to sections in this Agreement. unless expressly stated otherwise. References to specific section numbers shall include all subsections which follow the referenced section.

8.10 Interpretation. As used in this Agreement. masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others where and when the context so dictates. The words ''include" and "including'- shall be construed as if followed by the words -without limitation.’' The Parties acknowledge that each Party and his. her or its counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and that the rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any document executed and delivered by either Party in connection with this Agreement.

8.1 1 Modifications. Any alteration, change or modification of or to this Agreement, in order to become effective. shall be made in writing and in each instance signed on behalf of each Party.

8.12 Severability. If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this Agreement or its application to any Party or circumstances shall be held, to any extent. invalid or unenforceable. the remainder of this Agreement. or the application of the term. provision, condition or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected. and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

8.1 3 Computation of Time. The time in which any act is to be done under this Agreement is computed by excluding the first day, and including the last day. unless the last day is a holiday or Saturday or Sunday. and then that day is also excluded. The term -holiday’' shall mean all holidays as specified in Sections 6700 and 6701 of the California Government Code. If any act is to be done by a particular time during a day, that time shall be Pacific Time Zone time. 15 1419

8.1 4 Legal Advice. Each Party represents and warrants to the other the following:
they have carefully read this Agreement. and in signing this Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from their respective legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement; and, they have freely signed this Agreement without any reliance upon any agreement, promise, statement or representation by or on behalf of the other Party, or their respective agents, employees. or attorneys, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement.

8.1 5 Time of Essence. Time is expressly made of the essence with respect to the performance by City and County of each and every obligation and condition of this Agreement.

8.16 Mutual Cooperation. Each Party agrees to cooperate with the other to implement the terms and conditions of this Agreement and, in that regard, shall execute any and all documents which may be reasonably necessary. helpful, or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement.

8.1 7 Conflicts of Interest. No member. oftlcial or employee of County or City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation. partnership or association in which he is directly or indirectly interested.

8. 1 8 Non-liability of Officials and Employees. No member, official or employee of either Party shall be personally liable to the other Party. in the event of any Default. breach or for any amount which may become due. or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.

Each Party hereby waives and releases any claim it may have against the members, oftlcials or employees of the other Party with respect to any Default. breach or for any amount which may become due under the terms of this Agreement.

8.19 Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California. without regard to conflict of laws principles. shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement.

6.20 Contract Administrators. The County officer or employee with responsibility for administration of this Agreement is Don Ashton. Chief Administrative Officer. or successor.

The City officer or employee for responsibility for administration of this Lease is Joe Irvin, City Manager. or successor.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blankl
16 1420
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

CITY: COUNTY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a
municipal corporation
EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivisiot rnla
By: B
By ) isors
ayor
By
Heather Stroud. City Attorne;
ATTEST:

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: aP LI /1 m rk
ATTEST:

B)
Clerk
17 C - U, 7– :Lnx\ 1421
s/4}}#iT/
L 44 f
--'-'-+
LA & f
\B,b
t:IA
R
/
dIP
R /
fi - su _ R_ .

I I C == fHE ? ! I; To ra dar
B
R
JR
dR
al .- -–-
R
&B
& le ;
TEr:{t::?i: { a:IIbI
R
\
R
R ++ R
R
8 ( )\r )1( L ; I
'S
R
q:?!)rR -1 - \
FOr V
1422

EXHIBIT B

MASTER PLAN
++
I
LAKE!!TYly::IIng; he+
LAKE TAHOE #

TALL AC AVE
''.\ ,
8 rt t
t
on 100
n. LI G
1423

EXHIBIT C

CITY TRANSFER PROPERTY GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1 901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Attention: Joe Irvin. City Manager
Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

NO TAX DUE

GRANT DEED
(EL DORADO COUNTY TO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE)
WHEREAS. the City of South Lake Tahoe. a municipal corporation (''City") and El Dorado County. a political subdivision of the State of California ("County") have entered into that certain Agreement for Development, Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated to set forth the terms and conditions relating to among other things ( 1 ) the amendment and restatement of a series of prior agreements regarding the lease and development of certain real property located within the County and City referred to as the 56-Acre Property; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property to effectuate development of the 56- Acre Property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with a City-approved Master Plan; and (4) County's use of certain portions of the 56- Acre Property (the "56-Acre Agreement'-); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 56-Acre Agreement, County has agreed to transfer to City approximately 9.1 acres, resulting in an approximately 10.2-acre site when combined with existing City parcel for the purpose of development and construction of a new Multi-Generational Center. civic center, and parking lot, approximately 0.66 acres where the Ice Arena building is encroaching on County-owned property, and to grant easements over an approximately 4.8 acre site to be used as a right-of-way. in exchange for the City's grant to County of an approximately 11 .45 acre site for County governmental or recreational use.

NOW THEREFORE. the County does hereby grant to City, any and all right, title and interest in the real property located in the County of El Dorado, and described and depicted in Attachment 1 attached hereto. and referred to therein as ''City of South Lake Tahoe Proposed Parcel 3" ("Property'’) for public use. County further does hereby grant to the City a roadway Exhibit C- I
1424
and utility easement as further depicted in Attachment 1 attached hereto, and referred to therein as -Roadway and Utility Easement." The Property shall be used for public use. Private residential, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided, however, that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall be permitted. In the event the Property is not used for public use as provided herein, title and interest to the Property shall revert to the County.

Executed this day of . 202
COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY. a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:

Exhibit C-2
1425

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
)
)
On , before me,
Date
Jane Doe, Notary Public")
Name And TItle Of Officer (e g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument,
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal
Mrma7)
Exhibit C-3
1426

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated , from the County of El Dorado to the City of South Lake Tahoe (''City") is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. . adopted by the City Council on , and the grantee consents to the recordation of the Grant Deed on behalf of the City.

Dated :

CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a
municipal corporation
By:

Exhibit C-4
1427

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF )
)
On
Date
Jane Doe. Notary PUbIIC“)
before me
Name And TItle Of Officer (e g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s)
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal
TdTanre avt©m6iE
Exhibit C-5
1428
ATTACHMENT 1

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
Exhibit C-6
1429
JN819S.001
City PcI 3.docx
2/11/2022
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PROPOSED PARCEL 3

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
All that certain real property situate in Lot 1 of Section 32, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, County of El Dorado, City of South Lake Tahoe, State of California, and being a portion of Tract A as said Tract shown and delineated on that certain Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder and being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast Corner of said Section 32:

Thence from said Point of Commencement, along the Easterly line of said Section 32, North 00'20’03” West a distance of 1321.81 feet;
Thence continuing aFong said Easterly Section Line, North 00'15’50” West a distance of 775.91 feet to a point situate on the southerly Right-of-Way line of U,S. 50; Thence leaving said Section Line, along the aforementioned southerly Right-of-Way line, South 73'47’02” West a distance of 314.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning:

Thence from said True Point of Beginning, continuing along said southerly Right-of-Way line of U.S Highway 50, South 73'47’02” West a distance of 210.75 feet to a point of curvature; Thence continuing along said southerly Right-of-Way line, southerly and westerly 572.08 feet along the arc of a 990.00 foot radius tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 33'06’32"; Thence leaving said southerly Right-of-Way line, South 34'27’10" East a distance of 514.27 feet; Thence South 88'31’49" East a distance of 141.66 feet;
Thence North 00'20’03" West a distance of 90.63 feet;
Thence North 89'49’56" East a distance of 489.99 feet;
Thence North 00'20’03” West a distance of 11.36 feet;
Thence North 00'15’50” West a distance of 140.28 feet;
Thence leaving said proposed westerly Right-of-Way line, North 89'54’15" West a distance of 245.35 feet;
Thence North 00'04’52” East a distance of 547.79 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 9.112 acres of land, more or less.

The Basis of Bearings for this description is the aforementioned Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder

Page 1 of 2 ends

Exhibit C-7
1430
JN8195.001
City Pct 3.docx
2/11/2022
See Exhibit "G-l ", Plot to Accompany Description, attached hereto and made a part hereof.

Carl R. C.de Baca PLS 5854
zI 161 LL
Date
Prepared by
R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc
905 Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.850.8812

Page 2 of 2 ends

Exhibit C-8
1431
t
N
t

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 4
{Pk6P'OgfD'CItY
6ltV FAReEL' 3oF / /. I .'’ '. I /

9.112£ AC.'/

PROPOSED
couNTr
PARCEL 2 Mm©nna
LANDS

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 2
r P.0.C.
32 /3'3 {'1£ N
T. 12 N
LEGEND NOTE:

THIS PLAT iS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIFIC
INFORMATION, SEE EXHIBIT "G",

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT IS

ATTACHED
• P.0.8, = POINT OF BEGINNING
© P.0.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
+l SECTION CORNER
I R.E. Y, ENGINEERS, INC I
GviiEnginee.-s 1 Land Surveyors : LDAR
gas Sutter Street SuIte in
Folsom CA CH::I)
Phone tc916] 3C6-3M) Fox (916: 3t6'3:b3
EXHIBIT G-1
PLATO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION I _
PROPOSED CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PARCEL 3
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT A OF 16 S 30

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Date:

Scale:

Job No:

Prepared by:

FEB 2022
1" = 200'
8195.001
CRC
Exhibit C-9
1432
JN8195.001
COUNTY TO CITY XFER.docx
}}\IIzaII

EL DORADO COUNTY TO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE TRANSFER PARCEL

Cornmencing at the Southeast Corner of said Section 32:

Thence from said Point of Commencement, atong the Easterly line of said Section 32, North 00'20’03" West a distance of 780.10 feet;
Thence leaving said Easterly Section Line, North 88'56’42" West a distance of 550.16 feet to the True Point of Beginning:

Thence, from said True Point of Beginning, North 88'56’42" West a distance of 86.73 feet; Thence South 01'36’54” West a distance 311.27 feet;
Thence South 89'02'41” East a distance of 97.32 feet;
Thence North 00'20’03” West a distance of 311.18 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing

0.657 acres of land, more or less.

The Basis of Bearings for this description is the aforernentioned Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder ,
See Exhibit “J-1”, Plat to Accompany Description,attached hereto and made a part hereof. %.
; [H:I ii ::q 1H I \ t H A F1 L H F: c L/ t: a:I tH: f); !! 'I“I'” Date
Prepared by
R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc
905 Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.850.8812

Page 1 of 1 ends

Exhibit C- 10
1433
a
t
N
t

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3

PROPOSED
COUNTY PARCEL 1 NOTE:

THIS PLAT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIFEC
INFORMATION. SEE EXHIBIT "J".

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT IS

ATTACHED
TPOB -\

PORTION OF

PROPOSED CITY
/ PARCEL 1

EXISTING
COUNTY
PARCEL
/
/

TRANSFER PARCEL

EL DORADO COUNTY

TO CITY OF

TO SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

0.6571 AC.
rU)
..,J
LU
O
0(
<
a
>
1- Z
3 0
C)
frI
LU
C/) 0
a
0 a( a
; IWD32 33 T. 13 N
T. 12 N
LEGEND P 1C) C /
e T.P.0.B. = TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
© P.0.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
a SECTION CORNER
R.E.Y. ENGINEERS. iNC
avI EngIneers I Land Surveyors i LOAF
qIS StIller Street SuIte A)
InB1[:1:aB1

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION

COUNTY TO CITY TRANSFER PARCEL
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT A OF 16 S 30

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
EL DORADO COUNTY’ CALIFORNIA
Date:

Scale:

Job No:

Prepared by:

FEB 2022
1 " = 200'
8195.001
CRC

Page 1 of 1 ends

Phone' lg 16) ILb-UK\ Fox tQ 16} :N>-31)3
Exhibit C- II
1434
JN8195.001
ROW-DESC.docx
21\IIlaII

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

ROADWAY & UTILITY EASEMENT
All that certain real property situate in Lot 1 of Section 32, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, County of El Dorado, City of South Lake Tahoe, State of California, and being a portion of Tract A as said Tract shown and delineated on that certain Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the E[ Dorado County Recorder and being more particularly described as follows:

Portion A - Future Rufus Allen Boulevard
A Right-of-Way for public roadway and utility purposes, being 60.00 feet in width, measured at right angles and / or radially and described as follows:

Beginning at a point situate on the SoutherEy Line of said Section 32, from which the Southeast Corner of said Section 32 bears North 89'47’59” East a distance of 179.49 feet; Thence contTnuing along said Section Line, South 89'47’59” West a distance of 62.28 feet Thence from said Point of Beginning, leaving said Section Line, along the westerly Right-of-Way line of said roadway, northerly 146.56 feet along the arc of a 410,00 foot radius non-tangent curve to the right, from a radial line which bears North 75'52’21" West, through a central angle of 20'28’52”; Thence continuing along westerly said roadway Right-of-Way, North 34'36’31" East a distance of 25.29 feet to a point of curvature;
Thence continuing along westerly said roadway Right-of-Way, northerly 359.82 feet along the arc of a 590,00 foot radius tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 34'S6’34"; Thence continuing along westerly said roadway Right-of-Way, North 00'20’03” West a distance of 830.25 feet;
Thence continuing along westerly said roadway Right-of-Way, North 00'’15’50” West a distance of 758.76 feet to a point situate on the southerly Right-of-Way line of U,S. Highway 50; Thence leaving said westerly roadway Right-of-Way line, along the aforementioned southerly Right-ofWay line of U.S, Highway 50, North 73'47’02" East a distance of 62.40 feet to a point situate on the Easterly Line of said Section 32, also being the easterly Right-of-Way line of the aforesaid roadway; Thence leaving said southerty Right-of-Way line of U.S. Highway 50 and proceeding along said Easterly Section Line and easterly roadway Right-of-Way line, South 00'lS’50" East a distance of 775.91 feet; Thence continuing along said Section Line and easterly roadway Right-of-Way line, South 00'20’03" East a distance of 830,18 feet to a point of curvature;
Thence leaving said Section line and continuing along said easterly roadway Right-of-Way line, southerly 396,41 feet along the arc of a 650.00 foot radius tangent curve to the right through a central angle of 34'56’ 34”;
Thence continuing along westerly said roadway Right-of-Way line, South 34'36’31" West a distance of

25.29 feet to a point of curvature;

Page 1 of 3 ends

Exhibit C- 1 2
1435
JN8195.001
ROW-DESC.docx
IIL212022
Thence continuing along westerly said roadway Right-of-Way, 109.70 feet along the arc of a 350.00 foot radFus tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 17'57’26" to the Point of Beginning and containing 2.93 acres of land, more or less.

Portion B - Future Unnamed Roadway
Commencing at the aforementioned Southeast Corner of said Section 32:

Thence from said Point of Commencement, along the Southerly Line of said Section 32, South 89'47’59" 1229.41 feet;
Thence, leaving said Section Line, along the aforementioned Easterly Right-of-Way line, North 00'’02’00” East a distance of 726.29 feet to a point situate on the southerly line of a proposed 60.00 foot Right-ofWay as yet unnamed and being the True Point of Beginning; Thence from saFd True Point of Beginning, leaving the aforementioned Easterly Right-of-Way line of U.S.

Highway 50, and proceeding along the said southerly proposed unnamed Right-of-Way line, the following five (5) courses, distances and arcs:
1 2
3 4.

5. South 88'’44’16” East, 63.65 feet to a point of curvature; Easterly and northerly 183.67 feet along the arc of a 150.00 foot radius tangent curve to left through a central angle of 70'09’20”;
North 21'’06’24” East, 188.34 feet to a point of curvature; Easterly and northerly 325.44 feet along the arc of a 265.00 foot radius tangent curve to the right through a central angle of70'21’47";
South 88'’31’49" East, 633.79 feet to point situate on the proposed westerly Right-of-Way line of Rufus Allen Boulevard;
Thence leaving the aforementioned southerly Right-of-Way line of an unnamed roadway, along said proposed westerly Right-of-Way line of Rufus Allen Boulevard, North 00'20’03" West a distance of 60.03 feet;
Thence leaving said proposed westerly Right-of-Way line of Rufus Allen Boulevard and proceeding along the northerly Right-of-Way line of the aforementioned unnamed roadway the following five courses, distances and arcs:

1. 2.
3 4.

5. North 88'31’49" East, 631.90 feet to a point of curvature; Southerly and westerly 399.12 feet along the arc of a 325.00 foot radius tangent curve to left through a central angle of70'21’47";
South 21'’06’24" West, 188.34 feet to a point of curvature; Southerly and westerly 110.20 feet along the arc of a 90.00 foot radius tangent curve to the right through a central angle of 70'09’20";
North 88-44’16" West, 64.94 feet to poTnt situate on the aforementioned easterly RTght-of-Way line of U.S. Highway 50;
Thence leaving the aforementioned unnamed northerly Right-of-Way line of an unnamed roadway; along the said easterly Right-of-Way line of U.S. Highway 50, South 00'02’00” East a distance of 60,01 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 1.92 acres of land, more or less.

Page 2 of 3 ends

Exhibit C- 1 3
1436
JN8195.001
ROW-DESC.docx
II\212022
The Basis of Bearings for this descrIption is the aforementioned Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder
See Exhibit “A-1", Plot to Accompany Description, attached hereto and made a part hereof. a 4
2,}\QIVDate
Prepared by
R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc
905 Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.850'8812

Page 3 of 3 ends

Exhibit C- 14
1437
/// '/-'’
LR N(& e jS
'}? $
I
N

PROPOSEI
COUNTY
PARCEL 4

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 2
P.0.8.1/ 1

UNNAMED

ROADWAY
REMAINING i EX
CITY PARCEL 1 , C(
L"
,/14;} G
-Yil

PROPOSED
COUNTY PARCEL 1
T. 13 N
321 33
=
\ P.O.B.

RUFUS ALLEN
NOTE: BOULEVARD
THIS PLAT IS FOR [LLUSTRATEVE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIF EC
INFORMATEON. SEE EXHIBIT "A",

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT IS
ATrACHED
LEGENd
e P.0.B. = POINT OF BEGiNNING
Co) P.O'C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
+> SECTION CORNER
E. Y. ENG INFERS, INC
Gvil EngIneers I Land Surveyors I IDAR
q)S Sutter Street SUIte in
F,'„„,. CA 9&,:n
I Phone {916: 3£$'3CkK) Fox t(?16:1 3£6-31)3 1 ci r\no Ann oni IhITV- - -- - ' ' - – -' '– R EXHIBIT A-1

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION

PROPOSED ROAD & UTILITY EASEMENT
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT A OF 16 S 30
CIPr OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Date :

Scale:

Job No:

Prepared by:

FEB 2022
1 " = 300'
81 95.001
CRC

Page 1 of 1 ends

Exhibit C- 15
1438

EXHIBIT D

EXISTING RECREATION SITE GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

El Dorado County
Attention :

Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

NO TAX DUE

GRANT DEED
(CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE TO EL DORADO COUNTY)
WHEREAS, the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (''City") and El Dorado County. a political subdivision of the State of California ("County") have entered into that certain Agreement for Development, Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated to set forth the terms and conditions relating to among other things (1 ) the amendment and restatement of a series of prior agreements regarding the lease and development of certain real property located within the County and City referred to as the 56-Acre Property; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property to effectuate development of the 56-Acre Property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with a City-approved Master Plan; and (4) County's use of certain portions of the 56-Acre Property (the "56- Acre Agreement"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 56- Acre Agreement. City has agreed to grant to County an approximately 1 1 .45 acre site for County governmental or recreational use, in exchange for County's grant to City of approximately 9.1 acres resulting in an approximately 10.2-acre site when combined with existing City parcel for the purpose of development and construction of a new Multi-Generational Center. civic center. and parking lot, and an easement over an approximately 4.8 acre site to be used as a right-of-way.

NOW THEREFORE, the City does hereby grant to the County, any and all right, title and interest in the real property located in El Dorado County. described in Attachment 1 attached hereto, and referred to therein as "EI Dorado County Proposed Parcel 5" and ''City of South Lake Tahoe to El Dorado County Transfer Parcel’' (collectively, the "Property'’). The Property shall be used for public use. Private residential, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided. however. that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall Exhibit D- 1
1439
be permitted. In the event the Property is not used for public use as provided herein. title and interest to the Property shall revert to the City.

Executed this day of 202
CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a
municipal corporation
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Heather Stroud. City Attorney
AT’rEST
Susan Blankenship. City Clerk
Exhibit D-2
1440

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
)
)
On , before me,
Date
Jane Doe, Notary PUbIIC")
Name And TItle Of Officer (e g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument,
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal.

TmmMm
Exhibit D-3
1441

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated , from the City of South Lake Tahoe ("City") to El Dorado County ("County’'), a political subdivision of the State of California, is hereby accepted by order of the County Board of Supervisors on , and the grantee consents to the recordation of the Grant Deed by its duly authorized officer on behalf of the County.

Dated :

COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of California
Bv:

Chair. Board of Supervisors
AT'rEST :

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:

Deputy Clerk
Exhibit D-4
1442

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
)
)
On , before me,
Date
Jane Doe, Notary PUbIIC )
Name And TItle Of Officer (e g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal
r
Exhibit D-5
1443
ATTACHMENT 1

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
Exhibit D-6
1444
JN8195.001
County PcI 5.docx
2/10/2022
EL DORADO COUNTY PROPOSED PARCEL 5

Beginning at the Southeast Corner of said Section 32
Thence from said Point of Beginning, along the Southerly line of said Section 32, South 89'47’Sg’ West a distance of 210.73 feet to a point of intersection with a non-tangent curve; Thence leaving said Section line, northerly 128.15 feet along the arc of a 380.00 foot radius non-tangent curve to the right, from a radial IIne which bears North 74'42’50" West, through a central angle of 19'19’22
Thence North 34'36’31” East a distance of 25.29 feet to a point of curvature; Thence northerly 378.12 feet along the arc of a 620.00 foot radius tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 34'56’34";
Thence North 89'39’57” East a distance of 30.00 feet to a point situate on the Easterly line of said Section 32;
Thence along said Easterly Section Line, South 0'20’03" East a distance of 491.66 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 1.105 acres of land, more or less.

The Basis of Bearings for this description is said Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder.

See Exhibit “E-1", Plat to Accompany Description, attached hereto and made a part hereof.

I{\ : i (s] : ; {\B\ nE ! a F :: >CL+:1I • n1 :Arc : r: I } [ H] ]H F H: I;•: I i 1 :1 F== F1 : 1{II:;;I I F :( T tIjl ::J iCarl R, C.de Baca PLS 5854
HIdN/
Date
Prepared by
R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc
90S Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.850.8812
Exhibit D-7
1445
t
N
D
;D0
n
0 C/)
rnD
;aC
'Tt C
cn
J
I
PrFrI

PROPOSED
'COUNTY PARCEL 2
/’
//

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3
PROPOSED 60' ROAD nunn
I r
Z
aD A
<
a
Fj
>
lgI
(9
I
F5

REMAINING
CiTY PARCEL 1
Ex=s Nil
LgR4Fl

PROPOSED
COUNTY PARCEL 1
/

PROPOSED
COUNTY PARCEL 5

1.105£ AC
P. O.B.

T. 13 N
T. 12 N
321 33
£b2ab
'l'bl

LEGEND NOTE

THIS PLAT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIFIC
INFORMATION, SEE EXHIBIT "E".

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT iS

ATTACHED
e P.0.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING
+' SECTION CORNER
I R.E. Y. ENGINEERS, INC
Gvi! EngIneers ! Land Surveyors LDAP
St>SSutter Slreet SuIte ID
;o:som. CH CM:n
EXHIBIT E-1

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED EL DORADO COUNTY PARCEL 5
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT A OF 16 S 30
CiTY/ OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
EL DORADO COUNTY’ CALIFORNIA
Date:

I Scale: 1 " = 300' 1
Job No:

Prepared by:

FEB 2022
1 " = 300’
8195.001
Phone' (9 161 36£)'3CLX) Fox lg 16: 36fy3:D3 CRC
Exhibit D-8
1446
JN8195.001
City to County Xfer.docx
21\ajloa2

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE TO EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSFER PARCEL PROPERTY DESCRtPTION
All that certain real property situate in Lot 1 of Section 32, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, County of El Dorado, City of South Lake Tahoe, State of California, and being a portion of Tract A as said Tract shown and delineated on that certain Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder and being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at a point situate on the Southerly Line of said Section 32, from which the Southeast Corner of said Section 32 bears North 89'47’59” East a distance of 210.73 feet; Thence from said Point of Beginning, continuing along said Section Line, North 89'47'59” East a distance of 339.27 feet;
Thence leaving said Section Line, North 00'20’03” West a distance of 438.30; Thence South 88'’44’16” East a distance of 486.53 feet to a point of non-tangent curvature; Thence from a radial line which bears South 83'56’49" East, northerly 65.77 feet along the arc of a 590.00 foot radius non-tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 06'23’le'; Thence North 00'20’03" West a distance of 289.90 feet;
Thence North 88'56’42" West a distance of 490.14 feet;
Thence North 00'20’03” West a distance of 427.86 feet;
Thence South 88'3 1’49” East a distance of 490.24 feet; Thence North 00'20’03" West a distance of 104.64 feet;
Thence North 89'49’56” East a distance of 60.00 feet to a point situate on the Easterly Line of said Section 32;
Thence along said Easterly Section line, South 00'20’03" East a distance of 818.68 feet; Thence leaving said Section line, South 89'39’57” West a distance of 30.00 feet to a point situate on a non-tangent cuIve;
Thence from a radial line which bears North 89'39’57" East, southerly 378.12 feet along the arc of 620.00 foot radius non-tangent curve to the right through a central angFe of 34'S6’34”; Thence South 34'’36’31” West a distance of 25,29 feet to a point of curvature; Thence southerly 128.15 feet along the arc of 380.00 foot radius tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 19'’19’22” to the Point of Beginning and containing 10.354 acres of land, more or less.

The Basis of Bearings for this description is said Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder.

See Exhibit “H-1”, Plat to Accompany Description, attached hereto and made a part hereof.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Exhibit D-9
1447
JN8195.001
City to County Xfer.docx
2/10/2022
Carl R. C.de Baca PLS 5854
>I lblVr
Date
Prepared by
R.E.Y, Engineers, Inc
905 Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916'850.8812

Page 2 of 2 ends

Exhibit D- 1 0
1448
f
N
I

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3
NOTE:

THIS PLAT IS FOR ILLUSTRAT[VE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIFIC
INFORMATION. SEE EXHIBIT "H".

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT IS
ATTACHED.
r
TiANSFEi pAR/CEL/
}///CiTy ,'oF///,
//S6U'TFI 'LAKE ' TAHOE//
’TO EL DORADO COUNT'
IO.354£ he.//,
..J
LU
C)
Q(
<
a
[
Z
D
0 C)
a
LU
C/) 0
a
0 nca

PROPOSED CITY
PARCEL 1

EXISTING
COUNTY
PARCEL
32 33 T. 13 N
T. 12 N
LEGEND a
• P.0.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING
+p SECTION CORNER
I RE.Y. ENGIr-~JEERS, INC PLAT TO ACCOMPANY
mmM
DESCRIPTION I ,,„.. ,„ – ..,„ I

CITY TO COUNTY TRANSFER PARCEL
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT A OF 16 S 30

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Date:

Scale
Job No:

Prepared by:

FEB 2022
Ga: Engineers I Land Surveyors ! LDAR
m Sutter Street. SUIte XD
;ot50m. a\ (H):X)
Phone. (916} 366.no Fax {9 t6) 366.3:1):3
1" = 200
8195.001

TMS /CRC

Page 1 of 1 ends

Exhibit D-1 1
1449

EXHIBIT E

FORM OF VECTOR CONTROL PROPERTY GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joe Irvin, City Manager
Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

NO TAX DUE

GRANT DEED
(EL DORADO COUNTY TO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE)
WHEREAS. the City of South Lake Tahoe. a municipal corporation ("(:ity") and El Dorado County, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County") have entered into that certain Agreement for Development. Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated to set forth the terms and conditions relating to among other things (1 ) the amendment and restatement of a series of prior agreements regarding the lease and development of certain real property located within the County and City referred to as the 56-Acre Property; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property to effectuate development of the 56-Acre Property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with a City-approved Master Plan; and (4) County-s use of certain portions of the 56-Acre Property (the "56-Acre Agreement-'); and WHEREAS. pursuant to the 56-Acre Agreement, County has agreed to transfer to City an approximately one-acre site for public use.

NOW THEREFORE. the County does hereby grant to City, any and all right. title and interest in the real property located in the County of El Dorado. designated as APN 026-050-003 as set forth in Attachment 1 attached hereto (''Property") for public use. The Property shall be used for public use. Private residential, commercial. or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided. however. that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall be permitted. In the event the Property is not used for public use as provided herein, title and interest to the Property shall revert to the County.

Executed this day of . 202
Exhibit E- 1
1450
COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:

Chair, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By :

Deputy ClerkALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR

CALIFORNIA
Exhibit
1451

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
)
)
On , before me,
Date
Jane Doe. Notary PUbIIC'’)
Name of Signer(s)
Name And TItle Of OffIcer (e g
personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s)
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal
mrtmTNnTVPti6E
Exhibit E-3
1452

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated , 202 , from the County of El Dorado to the City of South Lake Tahoe (''City") is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. , adopted by the City Council on , and the grantee consents to the recordation of the Grant Deed on behalf of the City.

Dated : , 202
CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, a
municipal corporation
By:

Exhibit E-4
1453

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
)
)
On , before me,
Date
Jane Doe. Notary PUbIIC')
Name And TItle Of OffIcer (e g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument,
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
©niia-?aFH6EF7-P–LBTE
Exhibit E-5
1454

ATTACHMENT I

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
Assessor's Parcel Number 026-050-003
Exhibit E-6
1455

EXHIBIT F

FORM OF LEASE

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe. CA 96 150
Attention: Joe Irvin, City Manager
Exempt from Recording Fees
Per Government Code Section 27383
Space above this line for Recorder's use only

GROUND LEASE
This GROUND LEASE (the ''Lease“), dated as of ("Effective Date’'), is made and entered into by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a California municipal corporation ("City’'), and El Dorado County, a political subdivision of the State of California (''County’'). County and City may each be referred to as a ''Party“ or collectively as the ''Parties .

RECITALS
A. County and City have entered into various agreements over the last few decades to provide for the County's lease to City of certain property on a portion of the site known as the 56-Acre Property and the construction of various facilities on the leased property. The original Lease of Real Property between the County and City was dated July 1, 1 968, and thereafter replaced with a new lease and series of amendments as follows: (1 ) Lease of Real Property between the County and City dated December 12, 1972; (2) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated December 9, 1986; (3) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated April 14, 1987; (5) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated January 26. 2010: (4) Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of El Dorado and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Construction of the El Dorado Beach Improvement Project in the South Lake Tahoe Recreational Area("Beach Improvement MOU’');and (5) Amendment 1 to the Beach Improvement MOU dated April 17, 2014 " (collectively, the "Original 56-Acre Agreements"). In addition. the City and County entered into a Facility Use Agreement, dated February 1 5, 2012 for the County’s use of a portion of the City's leased property (collectively. the "Existing Use Agreement“).

B. The City has subleased certain portions of the Original County Property pursuant to the following lease agreements: (1) Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the South Lake Chamber of Commerce dated April 4, 2006; and (2) a Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the Tahoe Art League dated May 7, 2012 (''Existing City Subleases"). In addition, City has entered into a Sublease Agreement between the California Tahoe Emergency Services Operations Authority, dated February 1 1, 2020 ("EMS Sublease’-).

Exhibit F-1
1456
C. City and County have negotiated and entered into that certain Agreement for Development. Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated (the -New 56- Acre Agreement") to set forth the terms and conditions relating to (1 ) the amendment and restatement of the Original 56-Acre Agreements; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City’s ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with the Master Plan; and (4) County's use of certain portions of the 56-Acre Property.

D. In connection with consideration of the Master Plan and the New 56-Acre Agreement, the City completed review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA'-) and prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration.

E. Pursuant to the terms of the New 56-Acre Agreement, County desires to ground lease the property described and depicted in Attachment 1 to this Lease ("Leased Property") to City. subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease. As set forth in Attachment 1, the Leased Property consists of: El Dorado County Proposed Parcel 1 except the EMS Property; El Dorado County Proposed Parcel 2: El Dorado County Remaining Parcel 2; and El Dorado County Proposed Parcel 5.

NOW. THEREFORE. with reference to these Recitals and on the terms and conditions contained in this Lease, City and County agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

LEASE OF PREMISES

1. 1 Property. County leases to City. and City leases from County. the Leased Property. County and City acknowledge that all buildings and improvements currently located on the Leased Property constructed by City are and remain the sole property of City. City shall have no rights to subsurface minerals. petroleum, and other hydrocarbon substances, and County expressly reserves all of its rights to same.
1 .2 Existing Recreation Center Site. City shall demolish the existing recreation center on the Leased Property upon the completion of the new Multi-Generational Center pursuant to the terms and conditions of the New 56-Acre Agreement.
1 .3 As-Is Conveyance. City specincaIIy acknowledges and agrees that County is leasing the Leased Property on an "as is with all faults’' basis, condition and state of repair inclusive of all faults and defects. whether known or unknown. as may exist as of the Effective Date
ARTICLE 11

IMPROVEMENTS

2.1 Improvements. City shall have the sole authority over the development. operation and use of the Leased Property. and may determine, in its sole and absolute discretion. the type and nature of any and all improvements to be located on the Leased Property. subject to the use requirements in Section 5.1 below. The City authority described herein shall include the sole responsibility for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of all existing and Exhibit F-2
1457
new improvements on the Leased Property. County and City staff shall work cooperatively in the development. construction. operation and maintenance of the Leased Property. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. In a manner consistent with the Master Plan, in developing the Leased Property. the City shall endeavor to adequately preserve all historically-significant buildings currently located on the Leased Property and to locate and design any new recreational or government facilities in a manner that is complementary to the historically-significant buildings as identified in the Master Plan

2.2 Maintenance by City. Throughout the Term of this Lease, City shall have the duty to alter. rectify, correct. or replace any defective or dilapidated condition on the Leased Property at its sole cost and expense, including keeping and maintaining any and all existing and new facilities and improvements on the Leased Property in good order, condition and repair and in a safe and sanitary condition in compliance with all applicable laws in all material respects, and making all necessary repairs, including nonstructural and structural repairs, abatement, alterations, improvements, or additions to the Leased Property required to be made by law, statute, ordinance. order. or regulation now or hereafter made or issued by any federal, state. county, local, or other governmental agency or entity. except in the event of Loss or Damage pursuant to Article VII below. City specifically acknowledges and agrees that County does not have and shall not have any obligations with respect to the maintenance of the facilities and improvements on the Leased Property. except to the extent of County's negligent actions or omissions. City and County will meet and confer to address issues identified in a facility assessment study to be conducted by the County on the Leased Property.

2.3 Liens and Stop Notices. City shall keep the [.eased Property free and clear of all stop notices. mechanics' liens and other liens on account of any improvements constructed by or for City. City shall indemnify and save County harmless against liability. loss. damages, costs, attorneys' fees. and all other expenses on account of claims of lien of laborers or materialmen or others for work performed or materials or supplies furnished to City or persons claiming under it.

If a claim of a lien or stop notice is given or recorded affecting County's interest in the 1.eased Property. City shall within 30 days of notice of such recording or service: (a) pay and discharge the same: (b) effect the release thereof by recording and delivering to County a lien release bond in customary form and amount which results in the removal of such lien from the Leased Property; or (c) otherwise obtain or effect the release thereof.

2.4 Title to Improvements.
a. City shall have title to and ownership of any and all improvements and facilities constructed on the 1,eased Property by City under this Lease. b. Upon the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease. City and County shall meet and confer to coordinate and agree to terms regarding the ownership and/or removal or replacement of the improvements and facilities located on the Leased Property.

Exhibit F-3
1458

ARTICLE III
TERM

3. 1 Term. The term of this Lease shall be for fifty (50) years from the Effective Date (the "Initial Term"). The 1.ease shall be automatically extended on an annual basis up to a total of ninety-nine (99) years. The Initial Term in addition to any automatic extensions pursuant to this Section 3.1 shall be referred to as the "Term.

ARTICLE IV

MONETARY PROVISIONS

4.1 Reserve Fund. City shall establish and maintain a reserve fund (-Reserve Fund") for the purpose of paying for the cost of repairs, replacements, renovations, or upgrades to the Leased Property (-Replacement Expenditures"). Commencing three months after the Effective Date. and quarterly thereafter, City shall set aside and deposit into the Reserve Fund an amount equal to (i) the fees generated from the campground on the Leased Property, and (ii) two percent (2%) of the total asset value of all of the facilities on the 56-Acre Property (excluding the ice arena) ("Set-Aside Amount"). All interest and earnings on the Reserve Fund shall be added to the Reserve Fund. If the Net Operating Profits, as defined in Section 4.2(a) below, are less than the Set-Aside Amount in any given year, neither City nor County are obligated to provide additional funds to the Reserve Fund. Replacement Expenditures shall include general repair and replacement, renovations and upgrades, and major capital improvement projects.

Replacement Expenditures shall not include periodic, recurring, or routine maintenance that keep facilities in an ordinarily efficient operating condition. City shall provide County with an annual report no later than June 30 of each fiscal year documenting the annual Net Operating Profits, the balance of the Reserve Fund. and how the funds have been used and allocated to Replacement Expenditures. City and County shall meet at least once a year to review the Reserve Fund and discuss and prioritize projects to be funded, including without limitation, an expenditure plan detailing the amount and purpose of Replacement Expenditures for the upcoming year. and any changes as may reasonably be necessary to the Set-Aside Amount. The City will maintain and manage the Reserve Fund. In the event of early termination of this Lease pursuant to Section

9.4. City and County shall meet and confer to discuss the management and use of the Reserve Fund

4.2 Rent. City shall pay to County during the Term the following amounts ("Rent’-):
a. Net Operating Profits. City shall pay County an amount equal to 50 percent (50%) of the Net Operating Profits that remain after the City funds the Reserve Fund as set forth in Section 4. 1 (a) above. Net Operating Profits shall be calculated as the amount received by the City from all revenues generated from any source for use and rent of the 56-Acre Property, excluding the ice arena, but including without limitation, campground, facilities at Lakeview Commons, existing and new facilities. activities or special events (including outdoor camps or other programs) associated with existing and new facilities, minus all City costs to operate, maintain and refurbish such facilities, including all staff costs. operating expenses, and any taxes or assessments paid (excluding campground capital improvement expenses funded by special campground infrastructure fees). Payments shall be made quarterly with the fIrst payment due three months after the Effective Date. City shall deliver to County a reasonably Exhibit F-4
1459
detailed accounting of the Net Operating Profits with every quarterly payment made under this subsection (a), together with copies of such information as County may reasonably request. City shall maintain accurate books and records regarding City's profits and costs and expenses; and County shall have the right from time to time to inspect such books and records during normal business hours.
b. Additional Rent. Beginning the later of (i) 30 years after the Effective Date, or (ii) upon the full retirement or payment of any City-issued original debt to fund the development and construction of a New Multi-Generational Center, City shall pay the Additional Rent Payment (as defined below) to County on an annual basis. If the Additional Rent Payment becomes due under subsection (i) above, the first Additional Rent Payment shall be due on or before the 3 1 st anniversary date of the Effective Date. If the Additional Rent Payment becomes due under subsection (ii) above, the first Additional Rent Payment shall be due on or before the next anniversary of the Effective Date after the full retirement or payment of City-issued original debt and shall be pro-rated based on the percentage of the year remaining after such repayment.

Thereafter, the Additional Rent Payment shall be paid annually on or before the anniversary date of the Effective Date. The Additional Rent Payment is equal to $200.000, adjusted based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index. All Items. West Region. published by the United States Bureau of Statistics. The Consumer Price Index adjustment for the Additional Rent Payment will commence upon the Effective Date and continue annually for the Term of this Lease. Should said index either cease to exist or be modified so that it no longer performs its prior function. the Parties will meet and confer in order to determine a replacement index that most closely approximates said index.

4.3 Use of Rent Proceeds. The County agrees to spend all Rent received on County infrastructure and services in the Tahoe Basin area of El Dorado County. including, but not limited to. roads, trails. facilities. and utilities. County shall create a restricted fund for all Rent for tracking purposes. County shall provide City with an annual report no later than June 30 of each fiscal year documenting the Rent received, the balance of the restricted fund account. and how the funds have been used and allocated. City and County shall discuss the use of Rent as provided herein at the annual coordination meeting on use of the Reserve Fund. County has sole discretion to determine the use and allocation of the Rent but will consider the City's input on the infrastructure and services that will be funded by the Rent proceeds.

4.4 Property Taxes and Assessments. At all times during the Term. City agrees to pay in a timely manner all taxes, assessments, fees. and charges that at any time during the Term may be levied or charged by the federal government, the state or any other tax or assessment levying body on any activity carried on under this Lease, any interest in this Lease, any possessory right that City may have in or to the L.eased Property, or that is levied and assessed against the land that comprises the Leased Property and all improvements on the Leased Property. City, at no cost to County, reasonably may contest the legal validity or amount of any such taxes, assessments, or charges for which City is responsible. and institute such proceedings as City considers necessary.

4.5 Utilities. City, at its cost, shall be responsible for arranging for all utilities to be provided to the Property that are required for City's use. Each Party shall be responsible for paying all charges for its use of water. gas. electricity. telephone. sewage. refuse. and any other Exhibit F-5
1460
utilities or materials used or consumed on the Property directly to the party providing such utilities or services.

ARTICLE V

USE OF THE PREMISES

5.1 Use. The City shall develop, operate and maintain the Leased Property for recreation and government facilities, with primary emphasis on recreation. to serve the residents and visitors of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. In the event City desires to use the Leased Property for any use other than set forth in this Section 5.1. City may submit a written request for a use exception to the County. County shall consider such request in its reasonable discretion and respond in writing to City within 30 days of receipt of the request.

5.2 County Use of Senior Center Facility. Upon the completion of the New MultiGenerational Center, County, at its option, may elect to continue providing older adult programs at the existing Senior Center facility. In the event County exercises this option, City and County shall meet and confer to coordinate and agree to terms regarding County-s continued use of the existing Senior Center facility.

5.3 County Resident Use. The City shall allow residents of El Dorado County that do not reside within the City limits to use existing and new recreation facilities on the Property under the same policies and fee schedule applicable to City residents.

5.4 Compliance with Laws. City shall. at City's sole cost. promptly comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations ("Laws’'), including Laws regarding Hazardous Materials as defined below, and with the requirements of any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the Leased Property, relating to or affecting the Leased Property or the development. condition, or use of the Leased Property, including the obligation to make improvements. repairs, and alterations required by such Laws. regardless of the cost thereof. at what point in time during the Term compliance is required, and whether such compliance was foreseen or unforeseen. “Hazardous Materials “ means any substance. material. or waste which is or becomes regulated by any local governmental authority. the State of California. or the United States Government, including any material or substance which is: (i) defined as a "hazardous waste.'- "extremely hazardous waste." or -'restricted hazardous waste- under Sections 25 1 1 5. 25 1 1 7 or 25 1 22.7. or listed pursuant to Section 25 1 40 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5 (Hazardous Waste Control Law); (ii) defined as a "hazardous substance" under Section 253 1 6 of the California Health and Safety Code.

Division 20, Chapter 6.8 (Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act):
(iii) defined as a -hazardous material," "hazardous substance.'- or "huzardous waste" under Section 25501 of the California Health and Safety Code. Division 20, Chapter 6.95 (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory); (iv) defined as a "hazardous substance" under Section 25281 of the California Health and Safety Code. Division 20, Chapter 6.7 (Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances); (v) petroleum; (vi) friable asbestos: (vii)potychlorinated biphenyls= (viii) listed under Article 9 or defined as "hazardous" or -extremely hazardous pursuant to Article 1 1 of Title 22 of the California Administrative Code, Division 4. Chapter 20; (ix) designated as "hazardous substances" pursuant to Section 3 1 1 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. $ 131 7); (x) defined as a "hazardous waste'- pursuant to Section 1 004 of the Resource Exhibit F-6
1461
Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. $6901 . et seq. (42 U.S.C. $6903); or (xi) defined as ''hazardous substances" pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. $960 1. et seq.. as the foregoing statutes and regulations now exist or may hereafter be amended.

ARTICLE VI

INSURANCE

6.1 Insurance Required of City. During the Term, City shall provide, at its cost and expense, the following forms and amounts of insurance with respect to the L.eased Property or such equivalent amounts through an insurance pool. Such insurance shall be primary to and not contributing with any other insurance. self-insurance, or joint self-insurance maintained by the County, shall name the County and its officers. officials and employees as additional insureds, and shall include. but not be limited to:
a. Fire and Extended Coverage Insurance in All Risk form, with vandalism and malicious mischief endorsements, covering the Property and the improvements against loss or damage in an amount equal to not less than 1 00% of the replacement cost of the Improvements.
b. Broad Form Commercial General Liability Insurance protecting City against claims for bodily injury. personal injury and property damage based upon. or arising out of, the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance, directly or indirectly, of the Leased Property or improvements located thereon and all areas appurtenant thereto. Such insurance shall be written on an "occurrence" policy form providing single limit coverage in an initial amount of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and umbrella/excess liability insurance in not less than an initial amount of $5.000.000.
c. Auto Liability Insurance endorsed for all owned and non-owned vehicles in the initial amount of $2,000.000, combined single limit. d. Worker's Compensation Insurance in an amount and form to meet all applicable requirements of the Labor Code of the State of California.

6.2 City's Consultants, Contractors and Subcontractors. City shall require its consultants. contractors and subcontractors to maintain in force and effect worker's compensation and such other employee, general liability and property insurance as is customary for similar construction projects. Other than worker-s compensation insurance. County and its officers. officials and employees shall be named as additional insureds on all such insurance and City shall provide certificates of insurance confirming such additional insured status prior to commencement of any construction work.

ARTICLE VII

LOSS OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY

7.1 General. No loss or damage by fire, earthquake, flood or any other cause resulting in either partial or total destruction of the improvements located on the Leased Property, including any fixtures, personal property. equipment or machinery used or intended to Exhibit F-7
1462
be used in connection with the Leased Property shall operate to terminate this Lease or to relieve or discharge City from the payment of any Rent. City may, but is not required to, repair, reconstruct. and/or replace or cause to be repaired, reconstructed and/or replaced any improvements, including any fixtures or personal property used or intended to be used in connection with the Leased Property, in its sole discretion, provided that any insurance proceeds will be applied to the repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of the insured improvements.

7.2 Meet and Confer. In the event of partial or total destruction pursuant to Section

7.1 above, the Parties shall meet and confer to discuss the replacement of improvements and use of the Leased Property.

ARTICLE VIII

ASSI(,NMENT

8.1 Assignment Provisions. The qualifications and identity of City are of particular concern to County and material considerations for entering into this Lease. City shall not mortgage, pledge. hypothecate, encumber, transfer, sublease, or assign City's interest in the Leased Property or any part or portion thereof (hereinafter collectively referred to as ''Transfer’') without the prior written consent of County, which consent may withhold in its reasonable discretion. except as provided herein. County hereby preapproves the Existing County Subleases and any subleases to other government entities and local community non-profits, which shall not require consent by County pursuant to this Section 8.1. In the event that County sells or transfer all or any portion of the Leased Property. it shall assign its rights and obligations under the Lease

8.2 Notice of Assignment. City shall provide County with written notice of the proposed Transfer, together with a term sheet identifying the proposed assignee or subtenant. its use of the premises, the purchase price to be paid assignment of the Lease or rental rate for the sublease, at least ninety (90) days prior to the proposed effective date of the Transfer. County shall. no later than ninety (90) days after receipt of the information specified above, deliver written notice to City which shall indicate whether County give or withhold consent to the proposed Transfer. If consent is withheld, County shall set forth a detailed explanation of the basis for withholding consent. Should County consent to any Transfer, such consent and approval shall not constitute a waiver of any of the terms. conditions. covenants, restrictions or reservations of this Lease nor be construed as County's consent to any further Transfer. Any document regarding the Transfer of the Leased Property or any part thereof shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of this Lease and in the event of such inconsistency. the provisions of this Lease shall control.

ARTICLE IX
DEFAULT; REMEDIES; TERMINATION

9. 1 Remedies. If City at any time shall be in default in the payment of Rent or any other monetary sum called for by this Lease, or if either Party at any time shall be in default in the keeping and performing of any of its other covenants or agreements in this Lease, the nondefaulting Party shall provide written notice thereof to the alleged defaulting Party specifying the particulars of such default (''Notice of Default'’). If the non-payment of Rent continues for 30 Exhibit F-8
1463
days after City's receipt of Notice of Default or any other alleged default continues for 60 days after a Notice of Default. or if such other default is of a nature that curing the default will take more than 60 days and the alleged defaulting Party has failed to commence to cure the default within 60 days and diligently pursue completion of such cure, then such Party shall be in "Default" under this Lease.

9.2 Dispute Resolution. In the event of a Default, the Parties shall promptly meet in an effort to resolve the issues raised. If the Parties fail to resolve the issues raised. mediation may be pursued by mutual agreement. It is the intent of the Parties to the extent possible that litigation be avoided as a method of dispute resolution.

9.3 Institution of Legal Actions. In the event that dispute resolution does not resolve a Default, the non-defaulting Party may file a legal action to pursue specific performance or injunctive relief. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of El Dorado, State of California. or in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of the State of California. Neither Party shall have the right to recover any consequential. punitive or special damages.

9.4 Termination. This Lease may be terminated by mutual consent of the Parties.

ARTICLE X

INDEMNITY

10. 1 City's Indemnity. City shall indemnify. defend. protect and hold County and its officers. employees, agents and representatives, harmless from any and all liabilities, obligations. orders. claims. damages. fines. penalties and expenses, including attorneys' fees and costs ("Claims") to the extent arising from or in connection with (a) any condition created in or about the Property during the Term; (b) any breach. violation, or nonperformance of any term. condition. covenant. or other obligation of City under this Lease; and (c) any liens or encumbrances on the Leased Property arising out of any work performed or materials furnished by or for City.

ARTICLE XI

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
II. 1 [1olding Over. If City shall hold over the 1'eased Property after the expiration of the ’1-erm with the consent of County. either express or implied. such holding over shall be construed to be a tenancy from month to month subject to all the covenants, conditions and obligations contained in this 1.ease. City hereby agrees to continue payment of all monetary sums (such as taxes. insurance. etc.) which are the City's obligation under this Lease.

11.2 Quiet Possession. County agrees that City. upon paying the Rent and performing the covenants and conditions of this Lease. shall quietly have. hold and enjoy the Leased Property throughout the Term . County warrants to City that as of the Effective Date there are no existing tenancies on the Property.

11.3 Annual Review. The Parties shall meet at least once a year to review the status of the terms of the I.eased and to ensure adequate communication and to strengthen the relationship Exhibit F-9
1464
between the Parties. Prior to the annual meeting date, each Party shall submit to the other Party a written update on its compliance with the terms and obligations of this Lease. As part of such written update, County shall provide City with an accounting pursuant to Section 4.2 above.

11.4 Mutual Cooperation. Each Party agrees to cooperate with the other to implement the terms and conditions of this Lease and, in that regard, shall execute any and all documents which may be reasonably necessary, helpful, or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Lease.
1 1 .5 Notices. Any notice to be given or other document to be delivered by either Party to the other hereunder shall be in writing and delivered to either Party personally or by depositing same in the United States mail. duly certified, with postage thereon fully prepaid and addressed to the Party for whom intended. as follows:

To City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1 90 1 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Attention: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager
To County: El Dorado County
Chief Administrative Office
330 Fair I.ane
Placerville. CA 95667
Don Ashton, County Chief Administrative Officer
Either Party hereto, from time to time by written notice to the other Party, may designate a different address which shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices shall be effective when received. Any notice or other document sent by certified mail, as aforesaid. shall be deemed received 72 hours after the mailing thereof. as above provided. 1 1 .6 Waiver. No waiver of any breach of any of the terms. covenants. agreement, restrictions or conditions of this Lease shall be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same or other covenants, agreements, restrictions and conditions hereof.

11.7 Binding. Subject to the restrictions set forth herein regarding assignment. each of the terms. covenants and conditions of this Lease shall extend to and be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of not only County and City but to each of their respective heirs. administrators, executors. successors and assigns.
1 1 .8 No Joint Venture. The relationship of the Parties hereto is that of landlord and tenant, and it is expressly understood and agreed that County does not in any way or for any purpose become a partner of City or a joint venturer with City in the conduct of City's business or otherwise.
1 1 .9 Interpretation. The titles to the paragraphs of this Lease are not a part of this Lease and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any part of the Lease.

Exhibit F-10
1465

11.10 Covenants and Conditions. Each term and each provision to be performed by City or County. as the case may be, shall be construed to be both a covenant and a condition of this Lease.

II.1 1 Non-liability of Officials and Employees. No member, official or employee of either Party shall be personally liable to the other Party, in the event of any Default or breach or for any amount which may become due. or on any obligations under the terms of this Lease.

Each Party hereby waives and releases any claim it may have against the members, officials or employees of the other Party with respect to any Default or breach or for any amount which may become due under the terms of this L.ease.

11.12 Full Knowledge of Signatories. Each Party represents and warrants to the other the following: they have carefully read this Lease. and in signing this Lease, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from their respective legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Lease; and, they have freely signed this Lease without any reliance upon any agreement. promise, statement or representation by or on behalt'of the other Party, or their respective agents. employees, or attorneys. except as specifically set forth in this I.ease.

11.13 Integration. This Lease. together with the exhibits incorporated by reference. constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties as to the ground lease of the Leased Property and there are no conditions, representations or agreements regarding the matters covered by this Lease which are not expressed herein.

11.14 Restatement. This Lease amends and restates the Original County Leases in their entirety. As of the date of execution, the Original County Leases are of no further force and effect

11.15 Amendments. This Lease may only be amended in writing signed by the Parties.

11.16 Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in one or more counterparts. each of which shall be deemed an original. but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Lease shall be deemed executed when each Party notifies the other in writing that a counterpart has been signed by the notifying Party.

11.17 Contract Administrators. The County officer or employee with responsibility for administration of this Lease is Don Ashton. Chief Administrative Officer, or successor. The City officer or employee for responsibility for administration of this Lease is Joe Irvin, City Manager. or successor.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Parties have executed this Lease as of the Effective Date.

CITY :

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a
municipal corporation
COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of California
By: By:

Exhibit F-1 1
1466
Mayor

ROVED AS
Chair, Board of County Supervisors
Heather S
ATTEST:

By:
troud City Attorne)
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Exhibit F- 12
1467
ATTACHMENT 1
LEGAI. DESCRIPTION OF THE

PROPERTY
Exhibit F- 1 3
1468
JN819S.001
County PcI I.docx
2/11/2022
EL DORADO COUNTY PROPOSED PARCEL 1

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
All that certain reat property situate in Lot 1 of Section 32, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, County of El Dorado, City of South Lake Tahoe, State of California, and being a portion of Tract A as said Tract shown and delineated on that certain Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder and being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the southwest corner of said Tract A, being a point situate on the Easteriy Right-of-Way line of U.S. Highway 50 and from which the Southeast Corner of said Section 32 bears North 89'47’59" East a distance of 1229.41 feet;
Thence, from said Point of Beginning, along the aforementioned Easterly Right-of-Way line, North 00'02’00" East a distance of 756.30 feet;
Thence leaving the aforementioned Easterly Right-of-Way line of U.S. Highway 50, South 88'44’16” East,

64.30 feet to a point of curvature;
Thence easterly and northerly 146.93 feet along the arc of a 120.00 foot radius tangent curve to left through a central angle of 70'09’20”;
Thence North 21'06’24” East, 188.34 feet to a point of curvature; Thence easterly and northerly 362.28 feet along the arc of a 295.00 foot radius tangent curve to the right through a central angle of 70'21’47”;
Thence South 88'31’49” East, 142.60 feet;
Thence North 0'20'03” West a distance of 30,01 feet;
Thence South 88'31’49” East a distance of 490.24 feet;
Thence North 00'20’03" West a distance of 104.62 feet;
Thence North 89'49’56’ East a distance of 60.00 feet to a point situate on the Easterly line of said Section 32;
Thence along said easterly Section line, South 00'20’03" East a distance of 818.68 feet; Thence leaving said Section line, South 89'39’57" West a distance of 30.00 feet to a point of nontangent cuIvature; Thence, southerly 378.12 feet along the arc of a 620.00 foot radius non-tangent curve to the right, from a radial line which bears North 89'’39’57" East, through a central angle of 34'56’34”; Thence South 34'36'31” West a distance of 25.29 feet to a point of curvature; Thence southerly 128.15 feet along the arc of a 380.00 foot radius tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 19'19’22" to a point on the southerly line of aforementioned Section 32;

Page 1 of 3 ends

Exhibit F- 14
1469
JN8195.001
County PcI I.docx
21 \\12022
Thence leaving the aforementioned proposed Right-of-Way and continuing along said southerly line of Section 32, South 89'47’59” West a distance of 1018.68 feet to the Point of Beginning.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM:

All that certain real property situate in Lot 1 of Section 32, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, County of El Dorado, City of South Lake Tahoe, State of California, and being a portion of Tract A as said Tract shown and delineated on that certain Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder and being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast Corner of said Section 32:

Thence from said Point of Commencement, along the Easterly line of said Section 32, North 00-20’03" West a distance of 780.10 feet;
Thence leaving said Easterly Section Line, North 88'56’42" West a distance of 60.02 feet to a point situate on the proposed westerly Right-of-Way line of Rufus Allen Boulevard and being the True Point of Beginning:

Thence, from said True Point of Beginning, leaving the aforementioned proposed westerly Right-of-Way line, North 88'56’42” West a distance of 576.88 feet;
Thence South 01’36’54” West a distance of 311.27 feet;
Thence South 89'02’41” East a distance of 97.32 feet;
Thence South 00'20’03" East a distance 42.68 feet;
Thence North 88'44’16" East a distance of 486.53 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve situate on the aforementioned proposed westerly Right-of-Way line of Rufus Allen Boulevard; Thence along the aforementioned proposed westerly Right of Way line, from a radial line which bears South 83'56’49" East, northerly 65.77 feet along the arc of a 590.00 foot radius non-tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 06'23’14”;
Thence continuing along the aforementioned proposed Right of Way, North 00'20’03" West a distance of 289.90 feet to the Point of Beginning;
Containing 25.121 acres of land, more or less.

Page 2 of 3 ends

Exhibit F- 15
1470
JN8195.001
County PcI I.docx
2/11/2022
n•= =,nRel Jh nIM +
Carl R. C.de Baca PLS 5854
2 /J b /ZZ
Date
Prepared by
R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc
905 Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916'850'8812

Page 3 of 3 ends

Exhibit F- 1 6
1471

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3
g

PROPOSED
COUNTY PARCEL 2 EXISTING

CITY LANDS
t
N
t

REMAINING
CITY PARCEL 1

EXISTING
COUNTY
[
[ TA_R:FE Ji

PROPOSED

COUNTY PARCEL

25.121i AC
rT. 13 N 32
T. 12 N
33 P.0.B.

LEGEND &/JA ( Bb
NOTE: -

THIS PLAT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIFIC
INFORMATION, SEE EXHIBIT "A",

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT IS

ATTACHED
• P.0,B. = POINT OF BEGINNING
© P.0.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
+ SECTION CORNER
R.E.Y. ENGIN[ FRS, INC ®HIBIT A-1

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED EL DORADO COUNTY PARCEL 1
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT A OF 16 S 30

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
EL DORADO couNFr CALIFORNIA
Date:

Scale:

Job No:

Prepared by:

FEB 2022
1" = 200
8195.001
CRC
CMI Engineers I Land Surveyors
qIS Sutter Street Sale ID
Folsom (:kgH)IS
Phone 19161 3C£'3CyD Fax P 16:' 3e£>-31):

Exhibit F- 17
1472
Excepting from El Dorado Proposed Parcel ] that certain property on which the California Tahoe Emergency Services Operations Authority building and parking lot are located, as depicted below (the "EVIS Property"):

Exhibit F- 18
1473
JN8195.001
County PcI 2.docx
21\212022
EL DORADO COUNTY PROPOSED PARCEL 2

Commencing at the Southeast Corner of said Section 32:

Thence from said Point of Commencement, along the Southerly line of said Section 32, South 89'47’59" West a distance of 1229.41 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Tract A, being a point situate on the Easterly Right-of-Way line of U.S. Highway 50;
Thence, leaving said Section Line, along said Easterly Right-of-Way line, North 00'02’00" East a distance of 756.30 feet the True Point of Beginning:

Thence, from said True Point of Beginning, continuing along said Easterly Right-of-Way line, North 00'02’00” East a distance of 249.10 feet to a point of curvature; Thence continuing along said Easterly Right-of-Way line, 702.23 feet along the arc of a 990.00 foot radius tangent curve to the right through a central angle of 40'38’28”; Thence leaving said Easterly Right-of-Way line, South 34'27’10” East a distance of 514.27 feet; Thence South 88'31’49” East a distance of 141.65 feet;
Thence South 00'20’03" East a distance of 30.01 feet;
Thence North 88'31’49” West a distance of 142.60 feet to a point of curvature; Thence westerly and southerly 362.28 feet along the arc of a 295.00 foot radius non-tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 70'21’47”;
Thence South 21'06’24" West a distance of 188.34 feet to a point of curvature; Thence westerly and southerly 146.93 feet along the arc of a 120.00 foot radius tangent curve to the right through a central angle of 70-09’20";
Thence North 88'44’16" West, 64.30 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 5.602 acres of land, more or less.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Exhibit F- 1 9
1474
JN8195.001
County PcI 2.docx
It\1l2022
The Basis of Bearings for this description is said Record of Survey filed for record on November 16J 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder.

See Exhibit “B-1", Plot to Accompany Description,attached hereto and made a part hereof, _d2w/2d.._n- £SHI-Jar>
Carl R. C.de Baca PLS 5854
_2 ate // b/ID
Prepared by
R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc
905 Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.850.8812

Page 2 of 2 ends

Exhibit F-20
1475
t
t
N
I

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 4
D
Pa0
T
0 cr)
rna
;aCTI C
cr)
>
r
1--
m
Z
aar
<
a
;C
0 g

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 2
./, 5.602t AC

EXISTING
CITY LANDS -1
/‘
0 LO
>-
<(
a
1 CD
I
C/)
D

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 1
1 \T e p e o & B
i

REMAINING
CITY PARCEL 1

EXISTING COUNTY

PARCEL II
S89'47’59'’ W 1,229.41' T. 13N
T. 12 N
P.O.
33 C,£4E4‘

LEGEND /
THIS PLAT IS FOR ILLUSTRATiVE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIFIC
INFORMATION. SEE EXHIBIT "B".

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT IS
ATTACHED .

NOTE: +
/4/2/,
e T.P,0.B. = TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
(6) P.0.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
+> SECTION CORNER
RE.Y. Er\]GiNEERS. INC
avi Engineers I Land Surveyors I LDAP
q)5 Sutter Street SUIte 2CC
Folsom CA 91%30
Phone (9 IC>i 3&i'm) Fax :Q 161 3#)'31):3
EXHIBIT B-1

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED EL DORADO COUNTY PARCEL 2
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT A OF 16 S 30

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Date :

Scale:

Job No:

Prepared by:

JAN 2022
1 " = 200'
8195,001

TMS / DB
Exhibit F-21
1476
JN8195.001
County PcI 3.docx
1/7/2022
EL DORADO COUNTY REMAINING PARCEL 2

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Al 3 that certain real property situate in Lot 1 of Section 32, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, County of El Dorado, City of South Lake Tahoe, State of California, and being a portion of Tract B as said Tract shown and delineated on that certain Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder and being more particularly described as follows:

All that portion of said Tract B lying north of the northerly Right-of-Way line of U.S. Highway SO and containing 4.75 acres of land, more or less.

See Exhibit "C-I ", Plat to Accompany Description, attached hereto and made a part hereof, Carl R. C.de Baca PLS 5854
>[ lb r&t
ate
Prepared by
R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc
905 Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.850.8812
Exhibit F-22
1477

REMAINING COUNTY
PARCEL 2

4.744 AC PROPOSED COUNTY
a
a
I
c7)
rrt
a
0 a
0 PARCEL 4
t
N
I

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3

PROPOSED
COUNTY
PARCEL 2 n=+ =nB =nB an
&R@O®D mFaVr
auf-
<
a
D
b
g
//
//
fr
I

REMAINING
CITY
PARCEL 1
L

EXISTING COUNTY

PROPOSED
COUNTY PARCEL 1
PARCEL
J
/1
T. 13 N
T. 12 N
32 1 33
LEGEND NOTE:

THIS PLAT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIFIC
INFORMATION, SEE EXHIBIT "C"

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT IS
ATTACHED.
• P.0.8. = POINT OF BEGINNING
© P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
+b SECTION CORNER
R.E.Y. ENGINEERS. INC
Gui; Engineers I Land Surveyors 1 IDAR
GCB Sutter Street SuIte ID
Folsom CA qR>:D
Phone (9161 nJ:boMb Fox (9 1 CSI 3££>'3:b3
EXHIBIT C-1

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
REMAINING EL DORADO COUNTY PARCEL 2
BEING TRACT B OF 16 S 30

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Date:

Scale :

Job No:

Prepared by:

JAN 2022
1" = 300'
8195.001
CRC
Exhibit F-23
1478
JN8195.001
County PcI 5.docx
II\o12022
EL DORADO COUNTY PROPOSED PARCEL 5

Beginning at the Southeast Corner of said Section 32:

Thence from said Point of Beginning, along the Southerly line of said Section 32, South 89'47’59" West a distance of 210.73 feet to a point of intersection with a non-tangent curve; Thence leaving said Section line, northerly 128.15 feet along the arc of a 380.00 foot radius non-tangent curve to the right, from a radial line which bears North 74'42’50" West, through a central angle of 19'19’22
Thence North 34'36’31" East a distance of 25.29 feet to a point of curvature; Thence northerly 378.12 feet along the arc of a 620.00 foot radius tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 34'56’34";
Thence North 89'39’57" East a distance of 30.00 feet to a point situate on the Easterly line of said Section 32;
Thence along said Easterly Section Line, South 0 20’03" East a distance of 491.66 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 1.105 acres of land, more or less The Basis of Bearings for this description is said Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder.

See Exhibit "E-1", Plat to Accompany Description, attached hereto and made a part hereof. = = = = x a •= B b + : :: : 1x t
Carl R. C.de Baca PLS 5854
z / lb/& b
Date
Prepared by
R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc
905 Sutter Street #200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.850.8812
Exhibit F-24
1479
t
N
U
;00
D
0 C/)
m
a
;a
C
"TI C
C/)
>
r
rm
Z
aDr
<
a
J

PROPOSED
’COUNTY PARCEL 2
/

PROPOSED
CITY PARCEL 3
PROPOSED 60' ROAD
••n===
=•n•
/
I
i
0 LO
>
<
B
][
CD
][
C/)
D

REMAINING
CITY PARCEL 1
Ex::TIN;1
Lgg,IVrI

PROPOSED
COUNTY PARCEL 1
/

PROPOSED
COUNTY PARCEL 5
P. O.B.
:2X 33
I
T. 13 N
T. 12 N
I
I
I
LEGEND NOTE:

THIS PLAT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
PURPOSES ONLY. FOR SPECIFIC
INFORMATION, SEE EXHIBIT "E",

DESCRIPTION TO WHICH THIS PLAT IS

ATTACHED
• P.0.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING
+p SECTION CORNER
R.E. Y. ENGENF ERS. INC
Gvi1 EngIneers I Land Surveyors LDAP
gas Sutter Street. Suite XD
=olsorn. CH93:n
Phone' (91£>] 36£)'30£n Fax (916; 366'3:D3
EXHIBIT E-1

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED EL DORADO COUNTY PARCEL 5
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT A OF 16 S 30
ciPr OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
EL DORADO COUNTY’ CALIFORNIA
Date:

Scale:

Job No:

Prepared by:

FEB 2022
1 " = 300
8195.001
CRC
Exhibit F-25
1480

EXHIBIT G

FORM AMENDMENT TO GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1 901 Lisa Maloff Wav
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joe Irvin, City Manager
Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

N O TAX DUE

AMENDMENT TO GRANT DEED
(EL DORADO COUNTY TO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE)
WIILiR AS. the County of El Dorado granted and conveyed certain real property that consists of a portion of the property known as the 56-Acre Property to the City of South Lake Tahoe by Grant Deed dated April 17. 1973. and recorded in the Official Records of El Dorado County in Book 1 1 89, at Page 88 ("Original Grant Deed”); and W}IEREAS. the Original Grant Deed includes a list of six restrictions that range from requiring the property granted therein to be used for certain public uses to a limit on the square footage of impervious surface on the property (the "Restrictions'-); and WHEREAS, the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation ("City") and El Dorado County, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County") have entered into that certain Agreement for Development. Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated to set forth the terms and conditions relating to among other things (1 ) the amendment and restatement of a series of prior agreements regarding the lease and development of certain real property located within the County and City referred to as the 56-Acre Property; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property to effectuate development of the 56- Acre Property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with a City-approved Master Plan; and (4) County's use of certain portions of the 56-Acre Property (the "56-Acre Agreement"); and WHEREAS. pursuant to the 56-Acre Agreement. County has agreed to transfer to City approximately 9.1 acres resulting in an approximately 1 0.2-acre site when combined with Exhibit G- 1
1481
existing City parcel for the purpose of development and construction of a new MultiGenerational Center, civic center, and parking lot, and an easement over an approximately 4.8 acre site to be used as a right-of-way, in exchange for the City's grant to County of an approximately 1 1 .45 acre site for County governmental or recreational use.

NOW THEREFORE. the County and City hereby amend the Original Grant Deed to amend and restate the Restrictions with the following restriction: "That said real property shall be used solely and exclusively for public use. Private residential, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided, however, that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall be permitted.

Executed this day of . 202
CITY: COUNTY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a
municipal corporation
EL DORADO COUNTY. a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:.

By:_ Chair of Board of County Supervisors
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTES’I':

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Exhibit G-2
1482

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
)
)
On , before me,
Date
Jane Doe, Notary PUbIIC')
Name And TItle Of Officer (e.g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument,
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
r
Exhibit G-3
1483

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF )
)
On , before me,
Date
Jane Doe Notary PUbIIC")
Name And TItle Of OffIcer (e g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument,
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal
Ta?=RFFaFNa3TyFLi6TE
Exhibit G-4
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
January, 2022
56 ACRES

ENVISION

MASTER PLAN
1514
ii | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
INTRODUCTION: ENVISIONING 56 ACRES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2
MISSION, VISION, AND OBJECTIVES 3
PROJECT HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 CONTEXT AND PROJECT EVOLUTION 6
REVIEW OF EXISTING DOCUMENTS AND STUDIES 7
EXISTING DOCUMENTS AND STUDIES 7
CURRENT PLANNING EFFORTS 10
EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 14
CONTEXT SCALE MAPPING 16
SITE SCALE MAPPING 22
SITE ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 EXISTING CONDITIONS 28
SITE CONDITIONS 30
OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS 34

CONTENTS
1515
Table of Contents | iii
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS 38
ENGAGEMENT WINDOW ONE 41
ENGAGEMENT WINDOW TWO 46
ENGAGEMENT WINDOW THREE 47
DRAFT ALTERNATIVES & 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN . . . . . . . . . . 49 PROGRAMMING 50
PROGRAMMING CONCEPTS 56
MASTER PLAN 60
PHASING, FUNDING, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . 65 PHASING AND FUNDING 66
PHASING PLAN 67
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 68
1516
iv | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
List of Figures
FIGURE 1: PROJECT TIMELINE 6
FIGURE 2: 2020-2025 POPULATION GROWTH RATE BY BLOCK GROUP 14 FIGURE 4: SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2020 POPULATION GROWTH RATE 14 FIGURE 3: 2020 DIVERSITY INDEX BY BLOCK GROUP 14
FIGURE 5: SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2020 POPULATION BY RACE 14
FIGURE 6: 2020 MEDIAN AGE BY BLOCK GROUP 15
FIGURE 8: SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2020 POPULATION BY AGE 15
FIGURE 7: 2020 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY BLOCK GROUP 15 FIGURE 9: SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 2020 HOUSEHOLD INCOME 15
FIGURE 10: PUBLIC ACCESS & RECREATION 16
FIGURE 11: BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY 18
FIGURE 12: WALKING DISTANCES AND BEACH ACCESS 20
FIGURE 13: SITE OWNERSHIP MAP 22
FIGURE 14: SITE STRUCTURES MAP 23
FIGURE 15: SITE COVERAGE PLAN 24
FIGURE 16: SITE SOUNDSCAPE MAP 25
FIGURE 17: EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP 28
FIGURE 18: SITE OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS MAP 35
FIGURE 19: STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION CHART 40
FIGURE 20: BILINGUAL PUBLIC WEBINAR BANNER 44
FIGURE 21: PROGRAMMING CONCEPT 1 DIAGRAM 56
FIGURE 22: PROGRAMMING CONCEPT 2 DIAGRAM 56
FIGURE 23: PROGRAMMING CONCEPT 3 DIAGRAM 57
FIGURE 24: PREFERRED CONCEPT PROGRAM DIAGRAM 59
FIGURE 25: MASTER PLAN 60
FIGURE 26: MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE 61
FIGURE 27: PHASING PLAN 67
1517
Table of Contents | 1518 v
1519
The 56 Acres Master Plan, a collaboration
between the City of South Lake Tahoe and El
Dorado County, aims to create a signature park in
the heart of South Lake Tahoe. The Plan will build
upon the success of Lakeview Commons and
over a decade of site-oriented community, public,
and stakeholder engagement. The project goals
are aimed at residents and visitors alike. They
focus on recreational and civic needs, the creation
of meaningful world-class facilities and public
open space, environmental stainability, cultural
preservation, water quality, traffic mitigation,
aesthetic improvements, and habitat preservation.

Introduction:

Envisioning
56 Acres
1520
2 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The 56 Acres Master Plan is funded by a grant from the
California Tahoe Conservancy and is a collaborative effort between the two land owners, the City of South Lake
Tahoe and El Dorado County. The consultant team was
lead by Design Workshop. Key Stakeholders were included throughout the process to provide feedback on the master plan.

City of South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado County
Rufus Allen Boulevard with the existing Recreation Center in the foreground.

Consultant Team
Design Workshop, Inc.

Ascent Environmental
Cardno
Noll & Tam Architects
LSC Transportation Consultants
Key Stakeholders
California Tahoe Conservancy
El Dorado County Commission on Aging
El Dorado County Library, South Lake Tahoe Branch
El Dorado County Parks and Recreation Commission
Lake Tahoe Historical Society
Tahoe Art League
City of South Lake Tahoe Parks and Recreation
Commission
1521
Introducti on | 3
Mission
The master plan encompasses the public and stakeholder
groups’ vision for recreation, community, and government uses on the 56 Acres site. The plan is approvable,
implementable, and identifies phases with the Multigenerational Aquatics and Recreation Center project as the first phase to be built.

Project Challenges: The 56 Acres project site has many
of the characteristics of a town center including a central location and community driven site program. However, the area has been challenged by decades of under investment and ownership constraints. This plan addresses how to
create a recreation and government center for South Lake Tahoe while recognizing past land use obligations and
ownership along with constraints imposed by permitting
and funding.

Vision
For over 40 years the site referred to 56 Acres has
provided a wide range of activities and created fond
memories for residents and visitors from all over the world.

The location in the center of the City of South Lake Tahoe, adjacency to Lakeview Commons Beach, the existing
recreation and overnight camping accommodations on
site, the proximity to other recreation and educational facilities and convenient shopping and dining within
walking distance makes the site a community hub and
a basecamp for many visitors. Working closely with the
City, stakeholders and the public, the project team utilized knowledge, creativity, and experience to provide a master plan that will elevate the recreation and community
experience. The master plan embraces the natural beauty of the site, creates a framework for short and long-term environmental enhancements, identifies opportunities for on-site revenue generation for on-going maintenance and future improvements.

Objectives
Critical Success Factors
• Robust public engagement process
• Coordination and collaboration with the Recreation
Center project to ensure it is implemented as the first project identified in the MP
• Provide guidance on the preferred location of the
Recreation Center early in the process
• Coordinate with the area plan amendment to make
sure the elements of the MP can be built
• Coordinate the MP with other planning projects within the area such as Alta Mira, Conolley Beach, ballfields, Bijou Park MP, and Regan Beach
• Think broadly and collaboratively about partnerships
• Environmental improvements
• Revenue generating (recreation center, camping/
overnight - increase, concessionaire, special events,
reservable spaces)
• Safe crossings, release valve for Lakeview Commons
• Address parking and traffic issues – improve Highway
50 entries, internal connectivity
• Work collaboratively with City and County staff
• Utilize existing resources and previous work to reduce overall timeline and budget
• Compliance with CEQA analysis of potential impacts to vehicle miles traveled consistent with SB 743
• Quality control methods in place to ensure deliverables are complete, accurate, and appropriately edited
• Encourage non-motorized access to the site
• Outline how to fund and implement future phases of
work beyond recreation center

MISSION, VISION, AND OBJECTIVES
1522
1523
Project History
For over 40 years, 56 Acres has created lasting
memories for residents and visitors from all
over the world. The location in the center of
the City of South Lake Tahoe, as well as its
adjacency to Lakeview Commons Beach and
its proximity to other recreation and educational
facilities, makes the site a community hub and a
basecamp.
1524
6 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
What Is The 56 Acres Project?
The 56 Acres project is a collaboration between the
City of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County, with
support from the California Tahoe Conservancy to create a signature recreation and civic space in the heart of South Lake Tahoe. The property contains some of the largest
remaining public open spaces within the city limits. It hosts a variety of existing features, including various recreational facilities, a campground, a museum, highway frontage, and a scenic lakefront park.

The 56 Acres project sits in the center of the City of South Lake Tahoe at the juncture where U.S. Highway 50 meets
the shores of Lake Tahoe. The location of the project
provides an important gateway to vehicles approaching
the city from the west. The property contains some of the largest remaining public open space within the city limits.

It hosts a variety of existing features including various recreational facilities, museum, highway frontage, and a scenic lakefront park that drops off steeply leading to the beaches of Lake Tahoe. Just to the west of the project
site is the Harrison Avenue commercial district, which was improved by a streetscape project in 2015.

Project Background
For over 40 years the site referred to 56 Acres has
provided a wide range of activities and created fond
memories for residents and visitors from all over the world.

The location in the center of the City of South Lake Tahoe, adjacency to Lakeview Commons Beach, the existing
recreation and overnight accommodations on site, the
proximity to other recreation and educational facilities and convenient shopping within walking distance makes the
site a community hub and a basecamp for many visitors.
2007 to Present
The master planning process builds on previous planning efforts including the 2014 Recreation Master Plan, and
the master planning efforts for the 56 Acres which began in 2006 when the California Tahoe Conservancy, in
partnership with the City and El Dorado County, funded the development of a concept plan for the area. The process resulted in an in-depth analysis of existing environmental, historical, and cultural conditions in the project area and several alternatives for future uses and development.

Although the conceptual planning was never finalized,
the process was the impetus to begin improvements to
the site, which resulted in the construction of Lakeview Commons, a popular lakefront park with sweeping views of Lake Tahoe and The Sierra.

CONTEXT & PROJECT EVOLUTION
Figure 1: Project Timeline
1525
Project Hist ory | 7
Boat Ramp at El Dorado Beach and Lakeview Commons
Existing Documents and Studies
2007 56 Acres Master Plan
There are three main themes of the 2007 plan:

Connections, identity and access. Connections include
considering site to surrounding recreation opportunities, access includes building better relationships/access
between site amenities and identity includes developing the site as civic center with the local community as the primary driver. Key takeaways include:
• Public Engagement Outcome Steering Committee #1
» Dot game identifying liked and disliked parts of
the site, participants did not like the city yard and
vector control area.
» Precedent exercise was used to identify potential
program elements the most popular items were:
rustic amphitheaters, performing arts building,
a boathouse, campfire with yurts, creative
camp amenities, adventure play, forest plaza for
community events, outdoor movies, interpretive
stormwater management, and trails
» Post note issue identification most common
answers: Access across Highway 50, improved
trails, non-motorized boat facilities, renovations to
senior center, renovations to library, renovations to
campground.
» Steering Committee survey determined that users
often commuted there by car, lived between 2-10
miles away and use the site semi regularly
• Focus groups were held and used the same exercises,
listed are the different groups and the items they
wanted to most:
» Beach Users: Improved concessions, restrooms,
non-motorized rentals
» Harrison Avenue merchants: more parking,
improved access across Highway 50
» Campground Staff: more RV accommodation,
additional group gathering, improved facilities
(trash cans, hook ups), year-round options such as
yurts
» Library Staff: more space, additional rooms for
small and large gatherings, outdoor rooms, larger
collections, updated computer facilities
» Senior Center Staff: increased staff, safer access
through 56 Acres and public transit, more multipurpose spaces, improved dining facilities » Recreation Center Staff: larger gyms, more multipurpose spaces, cardio equipment, improved

REVIEW OF EXISTING DOCUMENTS & STUDIES
1526
8 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
admin offices, an indoor play area for young
children, improved outdoor areas
» Adjacent neighbors: did not participate
» Visitor’s Center Staff: Larger new facility, better
connection to rest of site, improved restrooms, add
retail space, maintain parking
» Boaters: dredge the channel, add break water, nonmotorized boat storage » Museum/Historical Society Staff: move locations
or combine collection, upgrade and expand
facilities
» Arts Center Staff & Users: dedicated art building
with outdoor and indoor spaces, room for studio
spaces, larger meeting spaces
2030 South Lake Tahoe General Plan
Key recommendations from the 2030 Plan include:
• Land Use
» Recreation land use surrounded by low density
residential, town center and special uses (schools)
» Development intensity
» 1-8 campground sites per acre
» 1-25 group facilities per acre
» 30% maximum land coverage
» Bijou/ Al Tahoe Community Area Plan, encourage
the creation a neighborhood with family
orientated recreation and public facilities including
government offices
• Community Character
» Mountain Architecture theme, pitched roofs,
natural colors and materials
» Native Plant Use
» Minimize visual impact of parking
» Strategically placed pedestrian scaled lighting
» New projects will protect and enhance scenic
quality
» Scenic Corridors: The City will work with Caltrans
to improve facades and landscaping along Highway
50 » Updated Wayfinding System fitting into Tahoe
style with more detailed distance and timing
information
» Improved pedestrian network, new developments
should connect to existing networks.
» Art in public places, the City will promote art in
public places
» Sustainable Development: Native and drought
tolerant landscaping for new and existing
development
» Environmental Justice: The City will promote
quality of public spaces that offer opportunities for
people of varying backgrounds and demographics
• Economic Vision
» To promote economic growth and diversification
» Year-Round Community: provide economic
incentives that increase year-round activity
» Expand Events and Entertainment Opportunities:

The City shall encourage sponsors to host events
at public facilities especially during off seasons
(Fall/Spring)
» Support Natural Capital: enhance outdoor
recreation opportunities
» Support Social Capital: Improve education
opportunities
» Create a Sense of Place: Through local business
and district character
» Regularly Scheduled Street Fair: Possibly along
Ski Run or Lakeview Commons; such as a farmers
market, street vendors, live music and special
events
2014 Parks and Recreation Plan
The City and County want to improve existing recreation facilities through their continued partnership and
relationships with other governing bodies. Goals in this plan address the need for varied recreation opportunities, year-round activities, improvements to revenue generating facilities for both residents and visitors. Improve recreation sites that showcase the world class landscape of Lake
Tahoe and bring environmental and economic vitality to the city. Key takeaways include:
• Regional Coordination and Collaboration – maximize
south shore goals of recreation and economic benefits
through partnerships with surrounding governing
bodies
• Park & Facility Maintenance, Renovation, and
Improvements – Renovate existing facilities to enhance
safety, accessibility, and protect revenue generating
resources long term
• New Park, Facility, and Trail Development – build new recreation facilities to provide an interconnected and
attractive recreation system that supports south shore
as a destination for outdoor recreation and tourism.
• Recreation Activities, Programs and Events – Activate recreation facilities with events, programs, and selfdirected opportunities to promote quality of life for residents and promote economic development
1527
Project Hist ory | 9
• Improvements to the multi-modal transportation
network create a more equitable transportation system,
for people who cannot afford a car and those who do
not have ability to drive a car
• Pedestrian and cyclist focused transportation improves local economies
• Protect the environment through a comprehensive
multi-modal transportation system
• Use the American Bicyclist 5 E’s to change community
attitudes toward active transportation. This framework
strives to educate and create safe opportunities for
pedestrians and cyclists.
» Engineering – altering roadways in favor of
pedestrian and cyclists
» Education – increase community awareness about
active transportation
» Enforcement – reminding roadway users of the
rules of the road to encourage safety between
users
» Encouragement – community events and initiatives
that promote active transportation
» Evaluation- studying how effective the active
transportation system is and what the user group
looks like; their methods of transportation and how
frequently they use that form of transportation
Regional Transportation Plan
The Regional Transportation Plan was created as
transportation plan to meet needs of locals and visitors.

This plan encompasses seasonal, daily, and regional uses.

Various corridors around the lake have been identified with the specific transportation needs for that area. Non-auto transport and public transportation were the primary focus, these transportation methods will decrease congestion,
improve water and air quality, improve safety, and create an equitable transportation system for priority communities.

Key takeaways included:
• Environment – Protect and enhance environment
• Connectivity – enhance Tahoe transportation system
between modes, communities, and surrounding
regions
• Safety – increase safety for all users
• Economic Vitality – enable a diverse workforce,
sustainable environment, and quality experiences for
residents and visitors
• Operations Management – provide efficient
transportation through coordinated operations and
targeted investments
• System Preservation – preserve transportation system
to support climate resiliency
• Operations and Management – Ensure staffing and
resource needs are met to make strategic plans for
recreation facilities
Active Transportation Plan
The Active Transportation Plan (ATP) presents a guide
for planning, designing, constructing, and maintaining
a regional active transportation network that includes
innovative infrastructure, support facilities, and awareness programs. The infrastructure network includes on-street bicycle facilities such as bike lanes, bike routes, and intersection designs that promote safety and convenient travel for bicycling and walking and off-street shared-use paths and sidewalks. The ATP outlines goals, policies,
and actions that support implementation of high priority projects and guides long-term planning. To support this process, the plan includes analysis of current conditions, provides data for future projects, and outlines levels of project priority. Key takeaways include:
• Use the complete streets framework to promote safer
bicycle and pedestrian travel
• Connectivity between origin and destination are
essential in user decision making process if a safe
route in not available potential users will choose a
vehicle instead
Public programs in the existing Recreation Center
1528
10 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Current Planning Efforts
Bijou Area Plan 1995/In-Process Plan
The community plan is a joint effort between the Tahoe
Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), the City of South
Lake Tahoe, and the Bijou/Tahoe Community Plan (CP)
Team. The CP area extends from Fairway Avenue along
Highway 50, just west of Al Tahoe Boulevard as well as
the property between Johnson Boulevard and Highway

50. Fundamental to the CP is the conviction that the Bijou/ Al Tahoe area should serve as a family-oriented space
and recreation center as well as the Town Center for the neighboring community. Key takeaways include:
• The Community Plan serves as a guide for the
enhancement of the Bijou/Al Tahoe area as a regional
commercial node and tourist area.
• Given the scenic and central location of the Bijou/Al Tahoe area, it is one of the most popular destinations
within the Lake Tahoe Basin. This has contributed to
environmental, economic, visual and transportation
challenges as a rising tourist destination.
• The Community Plan proposed to rectify some of the
growing challenges by supporting and encouraging the
removal, reconfiguration or relocation of development
within the Bijou/Al Tahoe area.
• A series of goals for the Bijou/Al Tahoe area were
adopted within the Community Plan
» Create a village like atmosphere in the Bijou/Al
Tahoe area and establish buffers between the four
districts
» Maintain a balance between economic health and
the environment
» Improve traffic circulation and parking. Reduce
dependency on the automobile and improve the
movement of people, goods and services within
the Plan Area.
» Ensure that physical development is consistent
with the environment and ecology of the area.
» Public services and facilities in a specific area.
» Preserve high quality family oriented recreational
experience of the Bijou/Al Tahoe area.

Bijou Area Plan Amendment
Underway
South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Swim Complex
The existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Swim
Complex sits on City land at what is known as the 56
Acres site. The site is comprised of four parcels totaling

56.35 acres. The County of El Dorado owns 73% of the
project site, while the City owns 27%. In 1973, a grant deed was executed by both agencies stating the “property should be used exclusively for public park, recreation, cultural and visitor information purposes. The City of South Lake Tahoe desires to construct the new recreation center in a different location on the 56 Acres site - providing a continuation of current recreation center.

Built in 1971, the South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Swim Complex has never had a major renovation and many
building systems and components are reaching the end of their usable life. The facility is inadequate for the current and future needs and demands of the City’s recreation
programs.

The project is the planning and design of a new community center to include:
• Aquatics
• Fitness
• Gymnasium
• Running track
• Senior center
• Meeting, multi-purpose, and classroom space
Community programs are offered at the existing senior center. 1529
Project Hist ory | 11
How does the Multi-generational Aquatics and Recreation Center relate to the 56 Acres Master Plan?
The Multi-generational Aquatics and Recreation Center project focuses on the programming, design, and construction of the new recreation, aquatics, and senior center building. The new building will be located along Lake Tahoe Boulevard with views of the lake. The 56 Acres Master Plan project has been coordinated with the Multi-generational Aquatics and Recreation Center project for the building location and also provides recommendations for trails, recreation and civic uses for the entire project area.

Schematic site plan of the new Multi-generational Aquatics and Recreation Center

E XISTING

LIBRARY

MULTI-GENERATIONAL

AQUATICS AND RECREATION
CENTER

E XPANDED

PARKING

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD
1530
1531
56 Acres is bordered on the north
by Lake Tahoe, on the east by Rufus
Allen Boulevard, and on the south by
a residential neighborhood. These
connections create an interconnected
trail network that allows visitors
and residents alike to access the
numerous beaches, recreation areas,
and public amenities all located under
a mile from the project area.

Existing
Conditions
1532
14 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Population Growth
2020 South Lake Tahoe Population: 23,145
The population in South Lake Tahoe is projected to increase at a rate of 0.7% between 2020 and 2025. By comparison
California has a population growth rate of 0.55% and the nation has a growth rate of 0.72%.

In 2020 the City also had a daytime population 6% larger than the total population.

Ethnic Makeup
2020 South Lake Tahoe Diversity Index: 72.1
South Lake Tahoe ranks 72.1 on the diversity index,
which summarizes an area’s racial and ethnic diversity.

By comparison the state of California ranks at 83 and the national diversity index is 65.

32.8% of City residents are of Hispanic/Latino origin.

70.3% of residents are White only.

Figure 2: 2020-2025 Population Growth Rate
by Block Group
Source: ESRI
Figure 3: 2020 Diversity Index by Block Group
Source: ESRI. Note: Diversity index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity).

Figure 4: South Lake Tahoe 2020 Population Growth Rate Figure 5: South Lake Tahoe 2020 Population by Race Demographic and Income Profile
City of South Lake Tahoe
Area: 10.36 square miles
Trends 2020-2025 Annual Rate (in percent)

1.8 1.6

1.4 1.2
1 0.8

0.6 0.4

0.2 0
Population Households Families Owner HHs
Population by Age
16 14

ANNUAL POPULATION

GROWTH RATE
(IN PERCENT)

SOUTH LAKE
TAHOE

CALIFORNIA
USA
0 0.2

0.4 0.6

0.8 1.0
Demographic and Income Profile
City of South Lake Tahoe Prepared by Esri
Area: 10.36 square miles
Area
State
USA
Trends 2020-2025 Annual Rate (in percent)

1.8 1.6

1.4 1.2
1 0.8

0.6 0.4

0.2 0
Population Households Families Owner HHs Median HH Income 2020
2025
Population by Age Percent
16 14
12 10
8 6
4 2
0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2020 Household Income
<$15K

13.8%
$15K - $24K

8.8%
$25K - $34K

14.1%
$35K - $49K

10.6%
$50K - $74K

18.4%
$75K - $99K

12.7%
$100K - $149K

12.1%
$150K - $199K

4.2%
$200K+

5.3%
2020 Population by Race Percent
70 65
60 55
50 45
40 35
30 25
20 15
10 5
0 White Black Am. Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+
2020 Percent Hispanic Origin: 32.8%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2020 and 2025.

PERCENT
0 20
40 60
10 30
50 70
WHITE
BLACK
AM. IND.

ASIAN

PACIFIC
OTHER
2+
81%
39%
39%
119%
43%
66%
131%
124%
33%
47%
-22%
100%
143%
114%
56% 44%
41%
110%
31%
42%
43%
0%
70%
42%
38%
41%
105%
43%
145%
133%
69%
60%
0%
69%
40%
35%
100%
123%
33%
122%
42%
56 ACRES

PROJECT AREA
HIGHWAY 50
CA|NV BORDER

PIONEER TRAIL
HIG
HWAY 50|89

CIT Y OF SOUTH LAKE

TAHOE BOUNDARY

LAKE TAHOE

80.9 60.9

73.4 84.4

76.9 70.7

70.6 71

68.1 57.1

77.8 23.2

27.7 72.5

45.3 69.3
43 31.9
29 85.8

76.8 84.4

87.9 81.7
0 36.7

26.9 3.6

45.4 43.6

40.7 28.9

29.9 28.5

35.2 73
0 67.3

62.2 38.3

27.2 35.2
56 ACRES

PROJECT AREA
HIGHWAY 50
CA|NV BORDER

PIONEER TRAIL
HIG
HWAY 50|89

CIT Y OF SOUTH LAKE

TAHOE BOUNDARY

LAKE TAHOE
1533
Existing Conditi ons | 15
Age
2020 South Lake Tahoe Median Age: 37.3
The median age in the City of South Lake Tahoe is slowly increasing – the median age was 35.6 in 2010; 37.3 in
2020; and is projected to be 38.0 in 2025. Overall 80.9% of the City’s population is age 18 or above.

Figure 6: 2020 Median Age by Block Group
Source: ESRI
Figure 7: 2020 Median Household Income by Block Group
Source: ESRI
Figure 8: South Lake Tahoe 2020 Population by Age Figure 9: South Lake Tahoe 2020 Household Income Household Income
2020 South Lake Tahoe Median Household
Income: $52,517
South Lake Tahoe has a total of 9,622 households in 2020 with an average size of 2.37 people. Median household
income is projected to increase to $56,429 in 2025.

Household income includes wage and salary earnings,
interest dividends, net rents, pensions, SSI and welfare payments, child support, and alimony.

Demographic and Income Profile
City of South Lake Tahoe Prepared by Esri
Area: 10.36 square miles
Area
State
USA
Trends 2020-2025 Annual Rate (in percent)

1.8 1.6

1.4 1.2
1 0.8

0.6 0.4

8.8%
$25K - $34K

14.1%
2020 Population by Race
70 65
60 55

PERCENT
0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54
Prepared by Esri
Area
State
USA
n HH Income
2020
2025
4 85+
0 6
12 2
8 14
4 10
16 Demographic and Incom
City of South Lake Tahoe
Area: 10.36 square miles
Trends 2020-2025 Annual Rate (in percent)

1.8 1.6

1.4 1.2
1 0.8

0.6 0.4

0.2 0
Population Households Families
Population by Age Percent
16 14
12 10
8 6
4 2
0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44
2020 Household Income
<$15K

13.8%
$15K - $24K

8.8%
$25K - $34K

14.1%
$35K - $49K

10.6%
$50K - $74K

18.4%
$75K - $99K

12.7%
$100K - $149K

12.1%
$150K - $199K

4.2%
$200K+

5.3%
2020 P
Percent
70 65
60 55
50 45
40 35
30 25
20 15
10 5
0 W
2020
$15-24K

8.8%
<$15K

13.8%
$200K+

5.3%
$150-199K

4.2%
$100-149K

12.1% $75-99K

12.7%
$50-74K

18.4%
$35-49K

10.6%
$25-34K

14.1%
34 25.6

29.8 35.8
38 38.1

35.4 38.6

38.3 58.9

47.6 44.1

37.2 39.6

46.5 46.7
37 36.6
41 52.3

47.1 44.4

35.4 33.9

42.6 30.5

29.6 60.8
0 52.2

49.2 42.5

56.7 34.9
0 35.7

37.8 39.7

51.7 41.7

44.1 57.2
56 ACRES

PROJECT AREA
HIGHWAY 50
CA|NV BORDER

PIONEER TRAIL
HIG
HWAY 50|89

CIT Y OF SOUTH LAKE

TAHOE BOUNDARY

LAKE TAHOE
$31,616
$52,337
$60,866
$44,938
$57,579
$62,094
$43,787
$56,004
$75,000
$35,490
$38,486
$33,634
$90,570
$117,304
$84,417
$64,331
$54,205
$31,604
$34,007
$35,562
$88,261
$47,027
$74,447
$0
$55,326
$52,120
$61,892 $123,195
$31,182
$78,964 $50,552
$43,302
$71,990
$81,295 $59,840
$102,299
$86,799
$75,826
$90,661
$80,315
56 ACRES

PROJECT AREA
HIGHWAY 50
CA|NV BORDER

PIONEER TRAIL
HIG
HWAY 50|89

CIT Y OF SOUTH LAKE

TAHOE BOUNDARY

LAKE TAHOE
1534
16 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

CONTEXT SCALE MAPPING
Public Access and
Recreation
Numerous recreational activities are
located adjacent to 56 Acres. Both
Regan Beach and Lakeview Commons
are located within walking distance
from the park and contain a host of
public amenities such as:
• Beach
• Amphitheater
• Grassy Lawn
• Sand Volleyball Court
• Dog Water Park
• Playground
• Observation Deck
• Picnic & BBQ Areas
• Boat Launch
• Public Plaza
In addition to public beaches, the
project site is located just north
of Bijou Community Park. Bijou
Community Park boasts a dog park,
skate park, bike park, open meadow
areas, disc golf, basketball courts, and
a historic railroad exhibit among other
public amenities.

Site Context and
Ownership
The site is in the heart of South Lake
Tahoe on a mix of City and County
land. The site is bordered on the
north by Lake Tahoe, on the east by
Rufus Allen Blvd, and a residential
neighborhood. To the south is the Al
Tahoe Ballfields, Middle School, Boys
and Girls Club and another residential
neighborhood, to the west is Highway
50 and Harrison Avenue commercial
district. Highway 50 bisects the site.

To the east of the project site lies
Bijou Golf Course, Bijou Community
School, and Bijou Community Park. To
the southwest lies the Upper Truckee
River Marsh and Restoration Area and
Trout Creek.

Figure 10: Public Access and Recreation

LAKEVIEW AVE

TALLAC AVE

MODESTO AVE

REGAN BE ACH

AL TAHOE

RESIDENTIAL

HARRISON AVE

COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

HISTORY MUSEUM

SENIOR CENTER

ART LEAGUE GALLERY
Lake Tahoe
• BEACH
• GRASS AREA
• SAND

VOLLEYBALL
COURTS
• PLAYGROUND
• OBSERVATION
DECK
• DOG WATER

PARK AREA
• BEACH
• AMPHITHEATER & OVERLOOK
PLAZA
• PICNIC & BBQ
• BOAT LAUNCH
• CHAMPION’S PLAZA

LAKEVIEW COMMONS/

EL DORADO BEACH
Sources: TRPA, CPAD
0 ft 350 700
North
LEGEND
Campground
School
Cemetery
Picnic Area
Recreation Field/
Court
Play Equipment
Swim/Recreation
Complex
Beach Access
Restrooms
Fire Station
Library
Ice Rink
Visitor Information
Existing Class 1
Shared-use Path
Proposed Class 1
Shared-use Path
Existing Class 2
Bike Lane
Proposed Class 2
Bike Lane
Existing Class 3
Bike Route
Proposed Class 3
Bike Route
Public and QuasiPublic Recreation
Areas
Public Lake Access
Project Area
1535
Existing Conditi ons | 17
AL TAHOE BLVD.

LYONS AVE

RESIDENTIAL

LIBRARY

CAMPGROUND

ST THERESA

CATHOLIC CHURCH
ICE
ARENA

ALTA MIR A PUBLIC

ACCESS PROJECT AREA
56 ACRES

PROJECT
AREA
SOUTH
TAHOE
MIDDLE
SCHOOL

BIJOU COMMUNITY PARK
TR ACK
& FIELD

BALLFIELDS
TENNIS
COURTS
• DOG PARK
• SKATE PARK
• BIKE PARK
• PICNIC & BBQ
• DISC GOLF
• BASKETBALL
COURT
• VOLLEYBALL
COURTS
• HISTORIC

R AILROAD

EXHIBIT
• OPEN
MEADOW
• PLAYGROUND

FAIRWAY DR

BLACKWOOD RD

SPRUCE AVE

PICKETT AVE

JOHNSON BLVD
RUFUS ALLEN BLVD.

GLENWOOD WAY
US 50/LAKE TAHOE BLVD.

BIJOU
GOLF
COURSE
BIJOU

COMMUNIT Y
PARK

BIJOU PINES

RESIDENTIAL

SLT REC & SWIM

COMPLEX PLAYGROUND
BIJOU

COMMUNIT Y
SCHOOL

CONOLLE Y BE ACH/ TIMBER

COVE MARINA
BOYS &

GIRLS CLUB

AL TAHOE

BALLFIELD
Bijou Creek
1536
18 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Figure 11: Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity
Connectivity
The 56 Acres Master Plan project site
is centrally located and boasts several
local and regional trail connections.

Bicycle
The park includes three levels of
bicycle facilities. An existing Class II
bike lane can be found running along
Highway 50, the northern and western
boundaries of the site. An existing
Class III bike route runs along Rufus
Allen Boulevard on the park’s eastern
boundary, and a Class I shared-use
path meanders through the path as
well as Lakeview Commons.

Pedestrian
Pedestrian circulation on site relies
on the Class I shared-use path that
runs throughout the park as well as
across Highway 50 in the Lakeview
Commons area. The shared-use path
extends east to Ski Run Boulevard
and continues south past the site on
Highway 50.

Class 1 Path along Highway 50,
adjacent to 56 Acres

TALLAC AVE

MODESTO AVE

LAKEVIEW AVE
REGAN
BEACH

UPPER TRUCKEE RIVER AND

MARSH RESTORATION AREA
Lake Tahoe
1537
Existing Conditi ons | 19
Sources: TRPA, CPAD
LEGEND
Intersection
Class 1 Shared-use Path
Class 2 Bike Lane
Class 3 Bike Route
Existing
Existing
Existing
Project Area
0 ft 350 700
North
56 ACRES

PROJECT
AREA

AL TAHOE BLVD

JOHNSON BLVD

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD

GLENWOOD WAY
HIGHWAY 50/LAKE TAHOE BLVD
BIJOU
GOLF
COURSE
BIJOU

COMMUNIT Y
PARK

SLT REC
CENTER

PROJECT BIJOU

COMMUNIT Y
SCHOOL

L AKE VIE W

COMMONS/

EL DOR ADO
BEACH

CONOLLEY BEACH/

TIMBER COVE MARINA

SOUTH TAHOE

MIDDLE SCHOOL
1538
20 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Walking Distances and
Beach Access
The project site is centrally located and
boasts a strong pedestrian network
with connections to numerous public
beaches and lake access. Within
only a third of a mile, visitors to
the park can reach both Lakeview
Commons and El Dorado Beach. Also
conveniently located are Conolley
Beach and Regan Memorial Beach,
located 0.7 miles to the east and 0.9
miles to the west, respectively. Upper
Truckee Marsh lake access is the
furthest away from the project site,
but at 1.2 miles to the west, it’s still
very much a pedestrian destination.

Aside from beaches, the shared-use
path and trail connections extend
in every direction from the park.

Sidewalks surround South Lake
Tahoe Middle School located just
south of the project site and a 0.5
mile sidewalk cuts across the site’s
southern boundary adjacent to the
school property. Pedestrians are able
to access Bijou Community Park in

1.3 miles via sidewalk and Ski Run
Boulevard in 1.2 miles via sidewalk
along Highway 50.

Wayfinding signage along Figure 12: Walking Distances and Beach Access Harrison Avenue.

LAKEVIEW AVE

UPPER TRUCKEE RIVER AND

MARSH RESTORATION AREA
Lake Tahoe
REGAN
BEACH

TALLAC AVE

MODESTO AVE
1539
Existing Conditi ons | 21
0 ft 350 700
North
Sources: TRPA, CPAD
LEGEND
Beach Access
Project Area

AL TAHOE BLVD

JOHNSON BLVD

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD

GLENWOOD WAY
HIGHWAY 50/LAKE TAHOE BLVD
BIJOU
GOLF
COURSE

SLT REC
CENTER

PROJECT BIJOU

COMMUNIT Y
SCHOOL

L AKE VIE W

COMMONS/

EL DOR ADO
BEACH

CONOLLEY
BEACH/

TIMBER COVE
MARINA

SOUTH TAHOE

MIDDLE SCHOOL
BIJOU

COMMUNIT Y
PARK
56 ACRES

PROJECT
AREA
1540
22 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

SITE SCALE MAPPING
Site Ownership
The project is jointly owned by the
City of South Lake Tahoe and El
Dorado County. While the County
owns most of the project site, the City
maintains an area for maintenance and
the Recreation Center. Adjustments
will be made in an updated lease
agreement between the City and
County.

Existing facilities on site. Figure 13: Site Ownership Map 0 ft 150 300
North

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD
HIGHWAY 50/LAKE TAHOE BLVD

HARRISON AVE

SLT REC
CENTER

LIBRARY
CAMP
STORE

CAMPGROUND
CHAMPION’S
PLAZA

TERR ACED

AMPHITHEATER
PLAZA
PICNIC
AREA
BEACH
ICE
ARENA
CIT Y

MAINTENANCE
CAMP

MAINTENANCE
VECTOR

CONTROL
SENIOR
CENTER

HISTORY
MUSEUM
FORMER

VISITOR
CENTER

LAKEVIEW COMMONS/

EL DORADO BEACH
Lake Tahoe SITE BOUNDARY
LEGEND
City of South Lake Tahoe
Ownership
El Dorado County Ownership
Existing Structures
1541
Existing Conditi ons | 23
Site Structures
Numerous structures are currently
located within the project area.

Building relocation and removal was
considered after significant county
and city input, as well as planning and
collaboration with co-current projects
on site such as the Multi-generational
Aquatics and Recreation Center.

The future for each building within the
park is variable. Some site structures
will remain, some will be relocated,
and others will be completely
removed altogether. Structures such
as the Ice Arena will remain in the
same location whereas numerous
campground and county maintenance
buildings will be removed. Other
buildings that will remain include the
library, ambulance service, Art League,
History Museum, and Osgood Toll
House & Log Cabin.

Existing buildings on site. Figure 14: Site Structures Map LEGEND
Will remain
Undetermined future
0 ft 150 300 Will be removed
North

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD
HIGHWAY 50/LAKE TAHOE BLVD

HARRISON AVE

SLT REC
CENTER

LIBRARY
CAMP
STORE

CAMPGROUND
CHAMPION’S
PLAZA

TERR ACED

AMPHITHEATER
PLAZA
PICNIC
AREA
BEACH
ICE
ARENA
CIT Y

MAINTENANCE
CAMP

MAINTENANCE
VECTOR

CONTROL
SENIOR
CENTER

HISTORY
MUSEUM

AMBUL ANCE

SERVICE

ART LEAGUE

LAKEVIEW COMMONS/

EL DORADO BEACH
Lake Tahoe SITE BOUNDARY
1542
24 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
LAND USE #

CHECKED

SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT #

SHEET TITLE

DESIGNED
DATE
DRAWN DESCRIPTION # DATE BY
Plot Stamp: 2/25/2021 10:00:47 AM - Parker Johnson
File: C:\Users\parker.johnson\OneDrive - Cardno USA Inc\E302405400 - 56 Acre Parcel Master Plan\15 CAD\1 DWG\4 Figures\56AC_TRPA COVERAGE.dwg, Tab: TRPA-1 56 ACRES PARCEL MASTER PLAN
TRPA
1 0
P
P
B
E
FOR

INFORMA
ON
100 200
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 100'
0 PROJECT AREA - EXISTING COVERAGE
LAND CAPABILITY TYPE 1B (SF) 7 (SF)
COMPACTED DIRT/SOFT COVERAGE 0 156,422
PARKING/DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, PATIOS, SIDEWALKS, AND UTILITIES 2,631 871,811 BUILDINGS 0 120,603
TOTAL EXISTING COVERAGE IN SQUARE FEET 2,631 1,148,836
TOTAL EXISTING COVERAGE IN ACRES 0.06 26.4
TOTAL PROJECT AREA IN ACRES 56.4
NOTES:

1. EXISTING COVERAGE WAS CALCULATED STRICTLY

TO THE PROJECT PARCEL LINES DEPICTED IN THIS
DRAWING.

CARDNO BASEMAP DEVELOPMENT NOTES:

THIS BASEMAP WAS DEVELOPED FROM MULTIPLE SURVEY AND ENGINEER MAPS/DRAWINGS. THESE MAPS EITHER WERE ON DIFFERING DATUMS, HAD NO DATUM, HAD POOR MATCHUP OR DIFFERENT ROTATION, ETC.

REFERENCE DRAWINGS AND PROCESS FOR COMBINATION AND RECTIFICATION:

1. TURNER SURVEY DRAWINGS - "9190000TOPO" AND "campground_topo_turner." CARDNO TRANSLATED AND ROTATED THE "campground_topo_turner" DRAWING TO THE "9190000TOPO" DRAWING BASED ON PARCEL LINES PROVIDED IN THE DRAWINGS. INFORMATION WITHIN THE DRAWINGS STATED THAT THE COORDINATE SYSTEM USED WAS NAD 83 ZONE II CALIFORNIA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTEM.

2. DRAWING "RHAA_plan" - CARDNO ADDED "RHAA_plan" CONTAINING LINEWORK FOR THE LAKEVIEW COMMONS AREA TO THE ABOVE TURNER SURVEY DRAWINGS. CARDNO TRANSLATED AND ROTATED "RHAA_plan" TO BEST FIT THE TURNER SURVEY DRAWINGS USING COMMON LINEWORK.

3. PSOMAS SURVEY "20201102-TP-JJ" - THIS DRAWING WAS RECEIVED AFTER THE ABOVE. INFORMATION WITHIN THE DRAWING INDICATED THAT THIS DRAWING, WHICH OCCUPIED A PORTION OF THE TURNER SURVEY DRAWINGS, WAS ALSO THE MOST RECENT SURVEY DRAWING (COMPLETED IN 2020). IN THE AREA AND INFORMATION WITHIN THE DRAWING INDICATED THAT IT CONFORMED TO KNOWN SURVEY DATUM NAD 83 ZONE II CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATES HOWEVER, THE PSOMAS DRAWING LOCATION DID NOT CONFORM TO THE ABOVE SURVEY DRAWINGS. THE CIVIL 3D GEOLOCATION TOOL INDICATED THAT THE PSOMAS DRAWING WAS LOCATED CORRECTLY TO THE NAD 83 ZONE II COORDINATE SYSTEM, SO THE PREVIOUSLY COMBINED/CONFORMED DRAWINGS WERE THEREFORE TRANSLATED AND ROTATED TO MATCH THE PSOMAS SURVEY. LINEWORK FROM PREVIOUS DRAWINGS WAS UPDATED TO MATCH PASOMAS DRAWINGS WHERE DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTICED.

4. CALTRANS HIGHWAY 50 ASBUILT AND DESIGN DRAWINGS - CARDNO RECEIVED THESE DRAWINGS IN PDF FORM MOST RECENTLY. THESE DRAWINGS WERE OLDER AND SOME WERE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT AREA INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS WAS NOT RELEVANT TO THIS BASEMAP.

5. GOOGLE EARTH - GOOGLE EARTH WAS USED FOR AREAS ALONG HIGHWAY 50 AND IN THE TRIANGLE PARCEL SOUTH OF LAKEVIEW COMMONS WHERE SURVEY/MAP INFORMATION WAS MISSING. A GOOGLE EARTH PHOTO WAS UNDERLAID IN THE CAD DRAWING AND CONFORMED TO LINEWORK. CAD MEASUREMENTS WERE TAKEN ON THE GOOGLE EARTH PHOTO TO VERIFY CONFORMANCE AND THEN THE MISSING MAP FEATURES WERE DIGITIZED INTO THE CAD DRAWING. FINAL MEASUREMENTS WERE TAKEN ON DIGITIZED LINEWORK TO VERIFY ACCURACY.

THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL PLANNING PURPOSED ONLY FOR THE "56 ACRE PARCEL MASTER PLAN" AND REQUIRED TRPA COVERAGE VERIFICATION AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY DESIGNED OR ENGINEERED PROJECTS. A NEW SURVEY CONDUCTED BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED SURVEYOR SHALL BE COMPLETED FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT PROJECTS.

Figure 15: Site Coverage Plan
Land Coverage and Tree Canopy
The Site Coverage Plan (Figure 15) was developed by
Cardno from multiple survey and engineer maps/drawings.

This drawing is intended for general planning purposed only for the “56 Acres Park Master Plan” and required TRPA
coverage. A new survey conducted by a California licensed land surveyor shall be completed for any subsequent
implementation projects.

Reference drawings and process for combination and
rectification:

1. Turner & Associates survey drawings - “9190000topo”
and “campground_topo_turner.” Cardno translated and
rotated the “campground_topo_turner” drawing to the
“9190000topo” drawing based on parcel lines provided in the drawings. Information within the drawings stated that the coordinate system used was nad 83 zone ii California State Plane Coordinate System.

2. Drawing “rhaa_plan” - Cardno added “rhaa_plan”
containing linework for the Lakeview Commons area to
the above Turner survey drawings. Cardno translated and rotated “rhaa_plan” to best fit the Turner survey drawings using common linework.

3. Psomas survey “20201102-tp-jj” - this drawing was
received after the above. Information within the drawing indicated that this drawing, which occupied a portion of the Turner survey drawings, was also the most recent survey drawing (completed in 2020). Linework from previous
drawings was updated to match Psomas drawings where
discrepancies were noticed.

4. Caltrans Highway 50 as built and design drawings
- Cardno received these drawings in pdf form. These
drawings were older and some were located outside of the project area information.

5. Google Earth - Google Earth was used for areas along Highway 50 and in the triangle parcel south of Lakeview Commons where survey/map information was missing. A
Google Earth photo was underlaid in the AutoCAD drawing and conformed to linework. AutoCAD measurements were
taken on the Google Earth photo to verify conformance
and then the missing map features were digitized into the AutoCAD drawing. Final measurements were taken on
digitized linework to verify accuracy.
1543
Existing Conditi ons | 25
Site Soundscape
The noise generated by Highway
50 creates a significant challenge
to the project site. As seen on the
soundscape map to the right, the
areas with the most significant noise
pollution are those that interface
with Highway 50 along the northern
and western site boundaries. Rufus
Allen Boulevard on the park’s eastern
boundary is also a significant source
of noise pollution.

The project site’s significant tree cover
protects the interior from high noise
levels generated by the busy roads
surrounding the park. However, much
of the northern areas on site are still
subjected to disruptive noise levels
and only the very interior of the site
remains largely noise free.

Highway 50 Streetscape Figure 16: Site Soundscape Map
0 ft 150 300
North

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD
HIGHWAY 50/LAKE TAHOE BLVD

HARRISON AVE

SLT REC
CENTER

LIBRARY
CAMP
STORE

CAMPGROUND
CHAMPION’S
PLAZA
PICNIC
AREA
BEACH
ICE
ARENA
CIT Y

MAINTENANCE
CAMP

MAINTENANCE
VECTOR

CONTROL
SENIOR
CENTER

HISTORY
MUSEUM
FORMER

VISITOR
CENTER

LAKEVIEW COMMONS/

EL DORADO BEACH
Lake Tahoe SITE BOUNDARY
LEGEND
High noise level
Moderate noise level
Low noise level
1544
1545
Site Analysis
This section describes the current
physical conditions and environmental
aspects of the site. This information,
which was collected and observed during
the early stages of the design process,
allowed our team to have informed
conversations with stakeholders and
advanced the master plan.
1546
28 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Heart of South
Lake Tahoe
The current 56 Acres site lies in the
heart of South Lake Tahoe. The park
is bordered to north and west by
Highway 50, to the east by Rufus
Allen Blvd. and to the south by a
neighborhood. The project site can
take advantage of amenities such as
expansion of Lakeview Commons
directly across Highway 50 to the
north and strengthen connections
to the Harrison Avenue commercial
district along the western border.

Currently, 56 Acres contains a
centrally located campground with
over 170 tent and RV sites. Camp
maintenance as well as County
maintenance and Vector Control
border the campground, at times
to the detriment of the adjacent
campsites and public areas. Two
modest parking areas are located on
both the north and south ends of the
site.

Class I and Class II bicycle facilities
surround the project site. The Class
I shared-use path runs adjacent to
Highway 50 and often suffers from
noise, traffic, and exhaust pollution.
“Registered Guests Only”
sign at Campground by the Lake. Figure 17: Existing Conditions Map 0 ft 350 700
North
Lakeview
Commons
Crosswalks
Existing Class 1
Shared-use Path
Proposed Class 1
Shared-use Path
Existing Class 2
Bike Lane
Proposed Class 2
Bike Lane
Existing Class 3
Bike Route
Proposed Class 3
Bike Route
Campsites
Parking
Restrooms
P
1547
Site Anal ysis | 29
Class I path and covered bus shelter located on Highway 50 in front of the existing library. 1548
30 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

SITE CONDITIONS
Ice Arena
The Ice Arena is owned by the City of South Lake Tahoe
and managed by a private operator. It is the only year-round indoor ice arena in the region and the facility hosts a variety of programs and teams that attract locals and visitors.

Library
The South Lake Tahoe Library is part of the El Dorado
County Library system. In addition to loaning print and digital media, the library hosts many community groups
and events.

Recreation & Swim Complex
The South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Swim Complex has
a variety of fitness rooms, meeting rooms, a gymnasium, and swimming pool. As well as an outdoor playground,
basketball, and volleyball courts. A new, relocated Multigenerational Aquatics and Recreation Center is currently being planned on 56 Acres.

Campground at the Lake
The campground is operated by the City and has been
a part of the site since the 1960s. It is one of the most popular campgrounds in the area. A separate maintenance area is currently included within the campground.
1549
Site Anal ysis | 31
Vector Control & Public Works
In the future, El Dorado County’s Vector Control facility will be relocated and the City’s Public Works facility may be scaled down in size. The City’s Public Works facility houses snowplows and the central location makes snow
work more efficient.

Lakeview Commons Phase 2
Unbuilt, proposed improvements to the shared-use path
and beach accessibility east of Lakeview Commons,
connecting to public land owned by the California Tahoe Conservancy, will create more useable space at the park and improve bicycle/pedestrian access.

Fire Training Facility
The South Lake Fire Department uses this facility for
training exercises. This building has been used for many different purposes over the years.

Lakeview Commons
Lakeview Commons was opened in 2011 providing
improvements to eroding shoreline at El Dorado Beach.

The park hosts a variety of events and is one of the most accessible beaches in the area.
1550
32 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Ambulance Service, Art League, History Museum,
Osgood Toll House & Log Cabin
Clustered in the southwest part of the site the Tahoe Art League and the Lake Tahoe Historical Society operate an art gallery and museum. The Historical Society cares for two historic buildings as well; the Osgood Toll House and a log cabin. Recently, the City entered into a 5-year lease with an ambulance service at former Visitor Center building.

Highway 50 Frontage
A recent 4-year $52M improvement project along Highway
50 by Caltrans included new sidewalks, landscaping,
lighting, and stormwater basins on site. Highway 50 is
a major feature of the 56 Acres site, dividing Lakeview Commons from the rest of the site. It discourages
pedestrian traffic due to limited crossings and fast road speeds.

Senior Center
The City of South Lake Tahoe Senior Center is an activity center that brings social, recreational, and educational opportunities for older adults. The Senior Center also
facilitates the El Dorado County Senior Nutrition Program.

Water Tower
The water tower, located southwest of the library,
dates from the 1930s. It was originally built to provide pressurized water to campers before South Lake Tahoe
had a water company.
1551
Site Anal ysis | 33
The historic 1930s log cabin is used by the Historical Society to house additional artifacts that do not fit in the museum.

The Campground by the Lake is well-loved and has potential for improvements to the camping experience. 1552
34 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Constraints
Highway 50 creates a significant barrier between Lakeview Commons, the Harrison Avenue commercial district
and the larger park site. This results in high volumes of pedestrians and bicyclists on both sides of Highway 50. In addition to isolating desirable lake side amenities, the noise pollution it creates is a detriment to recreation on site.

The high visitor use creates wear and tear on Lakeview
Commons facilities and the narrow and steep space
between the highway and the lake inhibits lake access.

Site Constraints Overview
• Highway 50 creates a barrier between Lakeview
Commons/the Harrison Avenue commercial district
and the larger park site.
• High visitor use creates wear and tear on Lakeview
Commons facilities.
• Uses are spread throughout the site and heavy tree
canopy can disorient users and reduce the sense of
place.
• Gap in bike trail along Rufus Allen Boulevard.
• High volumes of pedestrians and bicyclists on both
sides of the highway pose safety concerns.
• Narrow and steep space between highway and the
lake.
• Road noise adjacent to the highway.

OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS
Opportunities
Recent improvements to the Harrison Avenue commercial
district, Highway 50 frontage, and Lakeview Commons
have enhanced the area’s visual quality as well as improved walking and bicycling. The 56 Acres project site presents an opportunity for shared parking with the Harrison Avenue commercial district and lake access. Along with enhanced pedestrian crossings and recent bikeway improvements,
these developments will increase the vibrancy and mobility of one of the most active areas in South Lake Tahoe. In addition, many of these improvements can be coordinated with adjacent recreation, civic, trail and stormwater
projects. This kind of cooperation could not only result in positive community benefits, but reduce capital costs.

Many of the civic uses on site can be consolidated and
new civic uses can be included by designing new efficient, effective, and attractive buildings. New and engaging civic infrastructure will reinforce the site’s role as a premier civic and recreation destination.

Site Opportunities Overview
• The site is centrally located and close to commercial, residential, and school uses.
• Lakeview Commons has been successful and is
loved by both residents and visitors. The full site can accommodate some of the visitor demand while
creating a signature park and civic destination in the
heart of the city.
• Coordinating improvements with adjacent recreation,
civic, trail, and stormwater projects can increase
positive community benefits with reduced capital
costs.
• Harrison Avenue commercial district improvements
have enhanced the area’s visual quality and improved
walking and bicycling; the site location may present
shared parking opportunities for the district.
• Recent bikeway improvements can be continued to
eliminate gaps in the network.
• The healthy tree canopy can be preserved for visual
character while opening views to the lake and
enhancing wayfinding.
• Pedestrian crossings at Highway 50 can be enhanced.
• Civic uses can be consolidated, and more civic uses
can be included on the site by designing new efficient, effective and attractive building(s) that reinforce the site’s role as a civic and recreation destination.
1553
Site Anal ysis | 35
Opportunity area Class 1 bike path Building Viewshed
Gateway Sound buffer
Existing point of
interest
Residential edge Proposd bike path
connection
Pedestrian
connection
Figure 18: Site Opportunities and Constraints Map

LAKEVIEW AVE

TALLAC AVE

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD
US 50/LAKE TAHOE BLVD HARRISON AVE

SLT REC
CENTER

LIBRARY

BIJOU PINES

RESIDENTIAL

AL TAHOE
FIELD

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB

RESIDENTIAL

AL TAHOE

RESIDENTIAL
Expand civic presence and
improve the roadside image
of the site along US 50
Complete gap in
Class 1 bike path
Acknowledge
relationship to
surrounding
residential
neighborhoods
Repurpose Vector
Control site when
it is relocated
Bike connection
Improve pedestrian
crossing
Improve
pedestrian
crossing
Create an attractive
front entry and
improve site access
Consider
expanded outdoor
recreation
opportunities if
the Recreation
Center is relocated
by the Library
Provide trail
connection to Middle
School, Boys & Girls
Club, and sports
fields/courts

SITE WIDE INTERPRETIVE/

EDUCATION

OPPORTUNITIES
Upgrade & consider
year-round camping
opportunities
Consider
recreation and
civic opportunities
Provide interpretation of
historical structures
• Osgood Toll House
• Log cabin
• Stormwater
• Washoe culture &
traditions
• Emergency response &
training
Expand upon the success
of Lakeview Commons
& improve pedestrian
connection across US 50
Celebrate Tahoe’s
forest and tree canopy
while opening views &
enhancing wayfinding
Increase bicycle/pedestrian & path to
connect to nearby recreation area
Improve lake access
Buffer road noise while
providing views of the lake

HARRISON AVE

COMMERCIAL

DISTRICT
CHAMPION’S
PLAZA
ICE
ARENA

CIT Y PUBLIC
WORKS

CAMPGROUND

MAINTENANCE
VECTOR

CONTROL
FIRE

TRAINING
SENIOR
CENTER

HISTORY
MUSEUM

LAKEVIEW COMMONS/

EL DORADO BEACH
1554
1555
A Public Engagement Plan was developed
at the beginning of the master planning
process to ensure communication
throughout the project. The plan
considered the best methods of informing
the public and involving them in the
development of the 56 Acres Master Plan.

These methods creatively utilized new
digital tools and engagement strategies
during COVID-19.

Public
Engagement
Summary
1556
38 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
The project team developed a Public Engagement Plan
(PEP) to ensure communication occurred throughout
the process. The PEP considered the best methods of
informing the public and involving them in the development of the 56 Acres Master Plan. The final presentations,
exercises and content for each workshop varied from
what is identified in the PEP based on feedback from the City and County, but the approach and desired outcomes
remained the same.

Overall Engagement Goals
• Be equitable and inclusive.
• Be purposeful.
• Hold events that are approachable for all stakeholders and provide the necessary context.
• Conduct varied and multi-layered strategies to reach a wide and diverse audience and include more personal
interaction.
• Provide on-site and self-guided opportunities
• Weave public education into stakeholders and
community engagement
• Communicate trade-offs and manage expectations
• Identify and distinguish between recreation and civic goals and stakeholder priorities for the project.
• Clearly differentiate from the Recreation Center
engagement effort. Each project will inform one
another but allows for individual project focus.
• Learn from and invite participation from campground,
civic, mobility, recreation, and other on-site users
• Include implementation partners in project discussions Metrics of Success
The purpose of stakeholder and community input is
to capitalize on the wisdom of the many by gathering
balanced input from community members/stakeholders
representing all demographic, geographic, and interest
groups in the community on values, vision and design
specifics. This enables all community members to share in the decision-making process for the long-term success of the community’s planning efforts. Concerns and conflicts can be raised in a productive context that will use that information for the betterment of the project. The project team carefully designed the input process to efficiently and effectively gather input to serve the overall outcome.
1 Who is participating?
• How many people?
• How diverse?
• Previously engaged in other City/County efforts?
2 Satisfied with the process and project?
• Positive comments received?
• Easy for people to get involved?
• Did people feel included?
3 Impact of the engagement and outreach
• Impact engagement had on community’s
knowledge and ability to stay involved
• Better capacity to engage on future projects?
• Did process help the public to consider capital
/operational costs as part of decision-making?
• Input gathered align with overall engagement
goals?

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS
Advertising banner for websites and online media outlets. 1557
Public Engagement Summar y | 39
On-site signs in both English and Spanish informed
the public of the project.

Outreach Methods
The City and County were responsible for properly
advertising and marketing the engagement opportunities, and Design Workshop provided the graphic materials for
the print and digital campaigns.

DW summarized project content and involvement
opportunities in a web based StoryMap The link to
the StoryMap was available on the City, County, and
Recreation Center project websites.

Stakeholders
Based on the understanding of the stakeholder community, and input from the City and County, stakeholder groups
were organized into three groups: key, secondary, and
tertiary. Figure 19 shows the arrangement the stakeholders and interested parties into the three groups and visually depicts the grouping and engagement methods for each
group. Stakeholder engagement has been a cornerstone in the 56 Acres master planning process.

Project Development Team (PDT)
Bi-weekly meetings were held throughout the process
with this group. Staff members of the City, County, and Conservancy provided insights, reviewed project process and interim deliverables, and provided strategies for
addressing particular issues or adjustments needed
to meet project goals and addressed potential risks or
issues. In addition, this team managed administrative
issues including contract management; initial review of deliverables and project information before presentations to the stakeholders, and public; provided existing site and project information needed for planning team to conduct their work; and interacted with and provided updates to the City Council and County Board of Supervisors as needed.

Stakeholder Groups
These groups provided more focused input and feedback in a small group setting.

Commission Meetings
Updates to the City and County’s Parks and Rec
Commissions, City Planning Commission, and City Council were provided by the Planning Team, in coordination with City and County staff, at the end of each engagement
window. A summary of the project process and feedback
was received and offered with opportunities for direction and insights from the commissions and council meetings.

City and County staff provided similar updates to the
County Board of Supervisors during the same time-period.

Target Groups
Of the stakeholders identified, certain groups were
essential to target for the success of this project. These included: underrepresented populations (Latinx community, youth and older adults) and coordinating agencies (TRPA, Caltrans, mobility user groups, and recreation users).
1558
40 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Figure 19: Stakeholder Organization Chart
Stakeholder Organization
Project Development Team (PDT)
Regular PDT Meetings
City of South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado County
California Tahoe Conservancy
Agencies
Interim Feedback and Updates as
One-on-One Meetings
TRPA
Caltrans
Greater Community
Webinars, StoryMap, Surveys,
Self-guided Tours
SLT resident
Greater SLT/Meyers community
Commissions & Councils
Milestone Commission Updates
City | Parks and Rec Commission
City | Planning Commission
City Council
County | Parks and Rec Commission
County | Board of Supervisors
Interest Groups
Stakeholder Group Meetings
LTUSD
Boys & Girls Club
Tahoe Bike Coalition
Lakeview Commons Concessionaire
Tahoe Chamber
Reps for nearby neighborhoods &
districts (Fremont Ave Businesses, St.

Theresa’s Church, Hotel Azure)
Surveys
Rec Center Users (Rec Center Focus)
Campground Users (Surveys)
Seasonal Residents & Visitors
Webinars, StoryMap, Surveys,
Self-guided Tours
Seasonal residents
Visitors
Master Plan Focus Groups
Individual Meetings & Part
of Secondary and Tertiary
Stakeholder Group Meetings
Lake Tahoe Historical Society
Tahoe Art League
Library
Harrison Avenue Businesses
Potential donors (Private donors,
Tahoe Fund, etc.)
Senior Center (Rec Center Focus)
Interest Groups
Webinars, StoryMap, Surveys,
Self-guided Tours
Other recreation providers & vendors
Other community groups
Key Stakeholders | Self-identified, impacted or interested Secondary Stakeholders | Potentially Impacted and/or Interested Tertiary Stakeholders | Project/Process Observers
City Staff Steering Committee
City PM and Key City & County Staff
Design Workshop & Planning Team
Steve Noll, PIC
Ben Fish, PM
Stephanie Grigsby, Public Engagement
Groups also included in
Stakeholder Group Meetings
1559
Public Engagement Summar y | 41

ENGAGEMENT WINDOW ONE
Listen, Discover & Confirm Goals
and Programs
Engagement Window 1 focused on identifying purpose
and how information would be used. It took place between October 19, 2020 and November 13, 2020. The goals of
Engagement Window 1 were as follows:
• Confirm overall project vision and goals
• Input and feedback on program elements (including
scale, location, and character)
• Input and feedback on-site opportunities and potential challenges to be addressed
• Outcomes will be used to generate conceptual
alternatives presented in conjunction with the
Recreation Center concepts during Engagement
Window 2
• Gain initial input on priorities
Survey
Community and Visitor Survey:

November 2-22, 2020
An online survey was coordinated with workshop
information to get input from locals, part-time residents, and visitors on project vision, goals, and program elements. walk run ski climb jump eat skip dance play read bark race talk hug rest draw sing nap cook paint swim laugh meet write recite chat fall rise celebrate color jog hike crawl meditate bounce cuddle gather imagine dribble whistle lounge collect snack connect recharge mourn meow should crochet envision watch holler wiggle stare dream serve enjoy build embroider create design conserve shape teach unite cry compose share skateboard count cycle rollerblade knit entertain think listen wait examine inquire shout sit roll float journal weave photograph sew jump taste love study squabble fry workout orate drum sip grill walk run ski climb jump eat skip dance play read bark race talk hug rest draw sing nap cook paint swim laugh meet write recite chat fall rise celebrate color jog hike crawl meditate bounce cuddle gather imagine dribble whistle lounge collect snack connect recharge mourn meow should crochet envision watch holler wiggle stare dream serve enjoy build embroider create design conserve shape teach unite cry compose share skateboard count cycle rollerblade knit entertain think listen wait examine inquire shout sit roll float journal weave photograph sew jump taste love study squabble fry workout orate drum sip grill walk run ski climb jump eat skip dance play read bark race talk hug rest draw sing nap cook paint swim laugh meet write recite chat fall rise celebrate color jog hike crawl meditate bounce cuddle gather imagine dribble whistle lounge collect snack connect recharge mourn meow should crochet envision watch holler wiggle stare dream serve enjoy build embroider create design conserve shape teach unite cry compose share skateboard count cycle rollerblade knit entertain think listen wait examine inquire shout sit roll float journal weave photograph sew jump taste love study squabble fry workout orate drum sip grill walk run ski climb jump eat skip dance play read bark race talk hug rest draw sing nap cook paint swim laugh meet write recite chat fall rise celebrate color jog hike crawl meditate bounce cuddle gather imagine dribble whistle lounge collect snack connect recharge mourn meow There are many ways to participate!
Join us online for the webinar.

Take a self-guided tour at the site.

Take a survey.

Share with your friends. LEARN MORE AT
h t tps://www.ci tyo fsl t.us/ 1 1 10/Planning-Ini tia tives ENVISION 56
ACRES

SHARE YOUR

IDEAS TO SHAPE

THE FUTURE OF
56 ACRES IN THE

HEART OF

SOUTH LAKE
TAHOE
City of South Lake Tahoe | El Dorado County
November 10, 2020
5:30 PM - 7:00 PM

HOW TO JOIN
ZOOM: https://bit.ly/37NQ07s
Join by phone: 1.669.900.6833
Webinar ID: 984 3957 2057
Passcode: 438691
Flyer for Workshop #1
1560
42 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN Flyer for the Self-Guided Walking Tour and Survey 1561
Public Engagement Summar y | 43
Visitors participate in the Self-Guided Walking Tour
Walking Tour
This on-site self-guided walk was designed to meet
all COVID-19 safety protocols. People were invited to
participate in the self-guided tour between
November 2-22, 2020.

Printed maps and project information with QR codes and
survey link were distributed throughout the project site for a walk-through workshop. Boards at the Recreation Center covered project background, site analysis and mapping,
previous work, and goals. The same information was also available online through the project StoryMap and via
online survey for broader input options.

TAKE THE WALKING TOUR SURVEY
THINK BIG... IF THE NEW

MULTIGENERATIONAL

RECREATION & AQUATICS

CENTER WAS LOCATED NEAR THE

LIBRARY HOW SHOULD THIS
h t t p s: // a r c g.i s /S 9 1Tj STATION A
SPACE BE REUSED?

HOW DO YOU GET TO
56 ACRES?
TAKE THE WALKING TOUR SURVEY h t t p s: // a r c g.i s /S 9 1Tj STATION C 1562
44 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Figure 20: Bilingual Public Webinar Banner
Thank you for joining!
The meeting will begin shortly.
¡Gracias por unirte!
La reunión comenzará en breve.

Public Virtual Workshop #1
November 10, 2020
Public Webinar
A public webinar was conducted on November 10, 2020
through the online platform Zoom. The presentation
content and agenda was as follows:
• Virtual meeting format through Zoom.
• The team gave a short presentation to walk through
the project information and background materials and
asked some interim questions, opened up for Q&A,
and directed people to the online survey.
1563
Public Engagement Summar y | 45
Window 1
Engagement
Highlights
155
online survey
responses
39%
of survey
respondents visit
56 Acres on a weekly
basis year-round
62%
of online survey
respondents
access 56 Acres
by car
52%
of survey
respondents said
that incorporating
play facilities was
very important
1564
46 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

ENGAGEMENT WINDOW TWO
Collaborate
Engagement Window 2 took place between December
14, 2020 - January 22, 2021. The goals of Engagement
Window 2 were as follows:
• Receive input on conceptual alternatives to develop
preferred alternative
• Coordinate feedback and events with the Recreation
Center project
• Gather input on implementation priorities
Window 2
Engagement
Highlights
69 online survey
responses
63%
of respondents
preferred the Play
and Gather Areas
in Concept 3
53%
of respondents
would prefer
Tallac Avenue
through the site
60%
of respondents
said they were very
comfortable moving
forward with current
program elements
1565
Public Engagement Summar y | 47

ENGAGEMENT WINDOW THREE
Refine
Engagement Window 3 focused on presenting the Master
Plan and Master Plan Alternative. On March 31, 2021 there was a public webinar presentation and on May 4, 2021
there was a public presentation to a joint meeting between City Council and County Board of Supervisors for approval of the master plan. The goals of Engagement Window 3
were as follows:
• Receive input on preferred alternative to integrate
feedback into master plan document
• Confirm implementation priorities
• Approval of the master plan
Window 3
Engagement
Highlights
100%
approval from
El Dorado County
Board of
Supervisors
100%
approval from
City of South
Lake Tahoe City
Council
46 attendees
on the
public
webinar
94%
of respondents
said they were
comfortable moving
forward with the
master plan as
presented
1566
1567
Community and stakeholder
engagement led to the creation of a
series of initial programming concepts.

These gave shape to a variety of
possibilities for the project area.

Engagement efforts included eliciting
feedback regarding programmatic
elements of the site as well as
circulation, access, and the location of
amenities within the park.

Draft
Alternatives
& 56 Acres
Master Plan
1568
50 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Program Concept Development
Following public input opportunities including the selfguided tour, online survey, and first public meeting, a series of program concepts were developed to illustrate a variety of ways that 56 Acres could support and organize four
main categories of program elements. These categories
were: Civic and Community, Play and Gather, Open Space
and Trails, and Camping.

The first public survey resulted in over 200 participants.

The results of the survey helped shape the character of each program category, and drove the way program was
deployed on-site in each of the three original program
concept diagrams.

Survey respondents helped articulate the importance of
the Recreation and Swim Center, the library and providing safe, easy and accessible connections to Lakeview
Commons. In addition, survey respondents also reinforced the importance of adventure play features, native
landscape areas and gardens, a variety of sports courts, seating, and open lawn areas.

Participants stressed that trails within the park should provide connections to other areas as part of the citywide trail system, and the project area should have a walking and bicycling loop.

Programming For Every Season
The winter season doesn’t drive recreation to halt in
and around the Lake Tahoe Basin. Survey respondents
stressed the importance of year-round programming and
infrastructure of in the Tahoe region. A primary concern was that the trail system within the project area would not be accessible year-round. Residents and visitors alike preferred plowed walking and bicycling opportunities at 56 Acres during the snowy season.

Additionally, the public survey demonstrated that there are numerous winter recreation uses that are of interest for the project area. Respondents cited cross country skiing, sledding, and ice rink activities as some of their top winter priorities for getting out and enjoying 56 Acres in the snow.

PROGRAMMING
1569
Draft Alternatives & 56 Acres Master Plan | 51
Robust Civic Amenities
Maintaining robust community and civic amenities is critical to the success of the 56 Acres Master Plan. When asked
which amenities were most important to respondents
in Survey 1, civic amenities such as the Recreation and Aquatic Center, the library and Lakeview Commons rose to the top.

Other community and civic amenities that are being
prioritized include a facility for seniors, the ice arena, and a cultural center that celebrates the history and art of the Lake Tahoe region.

Community & Civic
Rec & Aquatics Center
Ice Arena
Library
Senior Facility
Civic Center
Cultural Center (History & Art)

CIVIC & COMMUNITY
1570
52 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Flexible Public Space
A key element of the 56 Acres Master Plan is ensuring
areas within the project area that are dedicated to a wide variety of amenities that support diverse types of play and various community events and gatherings. Play and
gather space in the park should be flexible, welcoming and encourage residents and visitors alike to relax, socialize, and stay active.

Community Oriented Events
Community oriented events are a cornerstone of the
South Lake Tahoe lifestyle. Whether it’s an amphitheater or a public plaza, residents and visitors should be ensured space within the park for community-oriented events of
varying sizes.

Play & Gather
Flexible Use Public Spaces

PLAY & GATHER
1571
Draft Alternatives & 56 Acres Master Plan | 53
Adventure Play
South Lake Tahoe is a national destination for adventure recreation. It is no surprise that residents and visitors alike cast their vote for the inclusion of adventure play amenities in the 56 Acres Master Plan. These features could
include slides, landform manipulation, nature-based play areas, rock climbing walls, and a numerous other multigenerational activities that teach new skills, and help to cultivate appreciation and excitement for the outdoors.

Interactive Elements
Interactive play elements such as sculptures, engagementbased interpretive material and fitness play features were among some of the top-rated interests in Survey 1. Many of these features can spark curiosity among all ages and can be made accessible regardless of ability level.

Play & Gather
Adventure Play Fitness Play Interactive Elements
1572
54 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Connected Trail Network
A connected trail network within the project area would bolster South Lake Tahoe’s already robust public trails network. Shared-use paths within the park would connect to key access points as well as circulate users throughout the site itself.

Accessible Open Space
The 56 Acres Master Plan is committed to helping design public spaces that are open and accessible to everyone
in the community. Safety, wayfinding, and signage are
all elements of creating a trail system that is usable, safe and accommodating to a variety of residents and visitors.

This includes crafting trails that are desirable for differently abled users, seniors, families, and pet owners among
others.

Trails & Open Space

TRAILS & OPEN SPACE
1573
Draft Alternatives & 56 Acres Master Plan | 55
Campground Updates
The Campground by the Lake has become one of the
most attractive destinations in South Lake Tahoe. In the Survey 1 results, a majority of respondents suggested that maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing campsites was critical, and the addition of a variety of year-round overnight options was desirable.

Year-Round Options
Based on market research, an increasing number of
campgrounds are moving to provide accessible year-round camping facilities. Options could include simple camping cabins, yurts, or other structures that would allow visitors to the campground to continue to enjoy this incredible
amenity throughout the year.

Camping
Replae
Yurts Tent Sites Tent Cabins
RV/Trailer Sites Camping Cabins

CAMPING
1574
56 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

PROGRAMMING CONCEPTS
Programming Concept 1:

Civic Center North
The Civic Center North program concept is defined by large swaths of camping, open space, and trails on the south
end of the site and a concentration of civic amenities to the north. In this program concept, the Recreation and
Aquatic Center, the library and civic center, the senior center and the cultural center are all grouped together in a civic-oriented hub. Parking is similarly concentrated within the northern portion of the site, providing ample and convenient parking adjacent to civic amenities. Additional parking can be found next to the city maintenance zone
and the ice arena but is largely located further north.

The areas of the site adjacent to Highway 50 are buffered by open space and trails as well as areas for play and
gather related activities. These areas form a linear park that connects to the Recreation Center as well as Lakeview
Commons. The camping area in this program concept is
shifted slightly south from its current location. It is the largest area to be allotted for camping out of the three concepts.

Programming Concept 2:

Civic Center South
The Civic Center South program concept’s most distinctive feature is a “Main Street” that meanders through the park and can be closed off for special events. This thoroughfare provides easy access to numerous on-site amenities
such as the civic center, play and gather spaces, the
campground, and additional parking that is connected to the cultural and senior centers.

Like its title, many of the Civic amenities in this program concept are concentrated in the southern half of the park.

Though the Recreation and Aquatic Center as well as the library are still located on the northern end of the site, the civic center, senior services, and cultural amenities (such as the cultural center and a cultural green) are all located to the south. Parking is located throughout the site, adjacent to convenient locations such as the Recreation and Aquatic Center, city maintenance and civic amenities such as
the senior center. The campground is consolidated and
centrally located. Because it is more compact, additional space can be allocated to other features.

Figure 21: Programming Concept 1 Diagram Figure 22: Programming Concept 2 Diagram US-50

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD

TALLAC AVE

LIBRARY

LAKEVIEW

COMMONS

CHAMPIONS
PLAZA
PLAY &
GATHER
PLAY &
GATHER

CLASS I PATH

PEDESTRIAN TRAIL

CLASS I PATH

LAKE TAHOE

LAKEVIEW AVE HARRISON AVE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
CIVIC
CENTER

CULTURAL
CENTER
SENIOR

SERVICES

PARKING

PARKING PARKING

EXISTING BUILDING

TO REMAIN FESTIVAL STREET

EXISTING BUILDING

TO REMAIN

ICE ARENA

CAMPING
CITY

MAINTENANCE

RECREATION &

AQUATIC CENTER
LC PHASE 2

CULTURAL
GREEN

OPEN SPACE
& TRAILS

OPEN SPACE
& TRAILS
US-50

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD

TALLAC AVE

LIBRARY
& CIVIC
CENTER

LAKEVIEW

COMMONS
PLAY &
GATHER

CLASS I PATH

PEDESTRIAN TRAIL

LAKE TAHOE

HARRISON AVE

COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

CULTURAL
CENTER
SENIOR

SERVICES

PARKING

ICE ARENA

EXISTING BUILDING

TO REMAIN

CAMPING
CITY

MAINTENANCE

RECREATION &

AQUATIC CENTER
LC PHASE 2

OPEN SPACE
& TRAILS

PARKING

PARKING
1575
Draft Alternatives & 56 Acres Master Plan | 57
Programming Concept 3:

Campground South
Like the Civic Center South program concept, the
Campground South program concept features Tallac
Avenue as a Main Street that runs throughout the park. The camping area remains consolidated and is located to the south. This concept features the smallest camping area out of the three concepts. Because the designated camping
area is compact, other amenities can take up additional space. The Recreation and Aquatic Center as well as the cultural and senior centers have slightly larger footprints and are more centrally located on site. Large parking areas appear in both the north and south ends of the site, with a smaller more compact parking lot close to the intersection of Tallac Avenue and Highway 50.

Additionally, play and gather spaces are found in the heart of the park. Open spaces and trails buffer most of the
Highway 50 and park interface while making room for a
large portion of the site to be programmed with a variety of different play and gather activities and amenities.

Figure 23: Programming Concept 3 Diagram Aerial view of Highway 50 and the Lakeview Commons Phase II site

LIBRARY

LAKEVIEW

COMMONS

CHAMPIONS
PLAZA
PLAY &
GATHER

CLASS I PATH

PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
CIVIC
CENTER

CULTURAL
CENTER
SENIOR

SERVICES

PARKING

FESTIVAL STREET

EXISTING BUILDING

TO REMAIN

EXISTING BUILDING

TO REMAIN

ICE ARENA
CITY

MAINTENANCE

RECREATION &

AQUATIC CENTER
LC PHASE 2

OPEN SPACE
& TRAILS

OPEN SPACE
& TRAILS
US-50

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD

TALLAC AVE

LAKE TAHOE

HARRISON AVE

COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

CAMPING

LAKEVIEW AVE
1576
58 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Preferred Programming Concept:

A Combination Concept
The preferred program concept was developed from critical feedback received by the South Lake Tahoe community,
the City, and the County. After robust public engagement, desirable elements from each of the three program
concepts emerged and as a response, a new program
concept was developed.

A shared-use path bisects a large play and gathering space that buffers a portion of the Highway 50 frontage. This large, concentrated zone for activities such as adventure play, fitness play, interactive elements, and a variety of gathering opportunities creates flexible public space that reaches into the heart of the park. Convenient access to Lakeview Commons emerges out of the play and gather
area, and open space and trails zones buffer most of
what remains of the Highway 50 frontage as well as the
southern boundary of the park.

The cultural center and senior center join forces in the southwest corner of the park and occupy a space directly off Highway 50. The camping area is concentrated in the southern half of the park but leaves room for large areas dedicated to the ice arena, parking, and city maintenance.

The site is bisected by an access road and parking lot. This increases accessibility to a variety of civic amenities within the park itself and fills a community need for additional parking near the Harrison Avenue commercial district.

In addition to the access road that runs west to east
throughout the park, a connected series of shared-use
paths allows visitors to walk through the heart of the site and enjoy 56 Acres away from the loudest areas adjacent to Highway 50. The shared-use path creates convenient
connections to access both Lakeview Commons and the
Harrison Avenue commercial district.

Many of the civic amenities are concentrated in the
northern half of the site. A large parking lot provides ample access to each of these amenities and the Multigenerational Aquatics and Recreation Center abuts both a play and gather area as well as open space and trails. This provides a seamless connection between recreational
activities in and out of doors for residents and visitors alike.

The Main Street will connect through the 56 Acres site at Tallac Avenue, as shown in this photo. 1577
Draft Alternatives & 56 Acres Master Plan | 59
Figure 24: Preferred Concept Program Diagram
0 ft 200 400
North
US-50

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD

TALLAC AVE

EXISTING

LIBRARY
CIVIC
CENTER

LAKEVIEW

COMMONS

PLAY & GATHER

CLASS I PATH

PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE

LAKE TAHOE

HARRISON AVE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
BIJOU

RESIDENTIAL

EXISTING

ARTS, HISTORY
& SENIOR
CENTER

PARKING

ICE ARENA

EXISTING BUILDING

TO REMAIN

CAMPING
CITY

FACILITIES

MULTI-GENERATIONAL

RECREATION &

AQUATIC CENTER
LC PHASE 2

OPEN SPACE
& TRAILS

MAIN STREET & PARKING

PARKING

CAMPING
1578
60 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

MASTER PLAN
Figure 25: Master Plan

CAMPING
(TENT & RV)

CIVIC CENTER
MULTIGENERATIONAL

AQUATICS &

RECREATION
CENTER
HIGHWAY 50
HIGHWAY 50

HARRISON AVE

TALLAC AVE
RUFUS ALLEN BLVD..

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD.

TRANSIT
STOP

LAKEVIEW COMMONS

EXTENSION

TRANSIT
STOP

EXISTING SENIOR
CENTER
CABINS

PLAYGROUND
MUSEUM

ART CENTER

LAKEVIEW AVE

LIBRARY

LAKEVIEW

COMMONS

EXPANDED
CHAMPION’S
PLAZA

FLEXIBLE

EVENT SPACE

FITNESS
PLAY

NATURE &

ADVENTURE
PLAY

CAMPING
CABINS
“MAIN
STREET”

ICE ARENA

REPURPOSED
BLDG..

CULTURAL
HUB

LAKE TAHOE
0 ft 100 200
North
1579
Draft Alternatives & 56 Acres Master Plan | 61
The master plan was approved by the City of South Lake
City Council and El Dorado County Board of Supervisors
on April 27, 2021, further negotiations with the lease
agreement between the City and County continued
through 2021. The following elements are shown in the
master plan:
• Enhanced at-grade pedestrian crossings at Rufus Allen Boulevard and Highway 50, Lakeview Avenue and
Highway 50, and Tallac Avenue and Highway 50.
• Continuation of the pedestrian lakefront promenade
at Lakeview Commons. Consisting of a cantilevered
boardwalk connecting from the existing Lakeview
Commons improvements to the existing stair access to
the lake across from Rufus Allen Boulevard.
• Expanded Champion’s Plaza. The parking area
immediately adjacent to the existing Champion’s Plaza
will be reclaimed for more pedestrian space with an
expansion of the plaza including new landscaping and
pavers. On street parking will be formalized along
Harrison Avenue and vehicular access to the boat ramp
will be maintained as is.
• The Multi-generational Aquatics and Recreation Center (MARC) is located on the northern part of the site with filtered views of Lake Tahoe. There will be associated
outdoor spaces for fitness and small group events.

There will be a shared service drive with the existing
library and a new Class I shared-use path connecting
from the parking lot to Lakeview Commons to double
as emergency vehicular access. The existing library
parking lot will be expanded to accommodate the
MARC and Civic Center.
• A new Civic Center is included in the center of the
site, immediately south of the MARC, creating a
courtyard between the buildings that can be used for
community events. The Civic Center will consist of two
buildings connected with one roof and a breezeway
between them—a two story 18,000 s.f. building for
administration offices and a separate one story 7,000
s.f. building for council chambers. 7,000 s.f. would
include space for restrooms, commercial kitchen, and
other support spaces. It could be leased for private
functions or used for municipal gatherings.
• A flexible event space is included to the west of the Civic Center, it is approximately 70,000 s.f. and would hold community events.
• Immediately west of the flexible event space is a
nature-based play area under the existing trees and
incorporating new earthwork of berming and sculpting
landforms.
• The Main Street bisects the site from west to east
connecting Tallac Avenue at Highway 50 to Rufus
Allen Boulevard. This would act as the primary spine
of vehicular access through the site with a new entry
to the campground and civic center. Approximately
50 parallel parking spaces would be located along the
two-lane access road. The Main Street could be closed
for community events.
• The existing campground would be reconfigured
and located more to the south. The campground
would have approximately 141 spots, with 118 being
spur sites for RVs and tents, and 17 cabin sites. It is anticipated the upgraded campground would be able to
accommodate year-round camping and have full hook
ups at most sites. One existing restroom would remain
in place, one would be relocated, and a new restroom
would be built for a total of three restroom buildings. • The existing Ice Arena would remain with the
possibility for a second sheet of ice located to the east where the current County Vector Control is located
along with a new expanded parking lot along Rufus
Allen Boulevard. This is not shown graphically in the
master plan, but could be considered in the future.
• The existing County Vector Control is proposed to be
relocated off site based on coordination between the
City and County.
• The existing Recreation Center and adjacent parking
is proposed to be removed and the site restored to a
natural state allowing a buffer with the campground.

The existing playground would remain and be
incorporated into the site.
• The existing City Parks Maintenance yard is proposed
to be relocated within the City.
• The existing Senior Center, History Museum, and Art
Center would remain with proposed upgrades to create
a cultural hub on the southwest side of the site. The
historic cabins would be incorporated into a community
green for small events and tours.
• Class 1 shared use paths will connect throughout the
site to fill gaps in the regional bicycle and pedestrian system.
1580
62 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN
Proposed rendering showing a view of the Main Street at the 56 Acres entrance across from Tallac Avenue.

Illustration showing an event along the 56 Acres Main Street 1581
Draft Alternatives & 56 Acres Master Plan | 63
Proposed rendering showing a view of the entrance of the new Multi-generational Recreation and Aquatic Center.

Illustration showing potential camping cabins within the new campground. 1582
1583
Phasing, Funding,
Operations &
Maintenance
1584
66 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

PHASING AND FUNDING
The following outline describes a potential phasing
approach dependent upon funding. Further coordination
between the City of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado
County is needed.
• First Phase: Multi-generational Recreation and
Aquatics Center
Phase 1: Site and Utility Work
Phase 2: Vertical Construction
• Second Phase: Build 3/4 of Main Street ending in a
cul de sac near Highway 50 and build first phase of
campground renovations (Tent and RV Sites)
• Next Phase: Camping Cabins
• Next Phase: Event Space, Adventure Play,
and Fitness Play
• Subsequent Phases would include connecting Main
Street to Highway 50, Civic Center, Cultural Hub,
Lakeview Commons Extension, and demolition of
existing Recreation Center and Vector Control.

Funding:

Funding sources may include but are not limited to:

California Prop 68
Air quality mitigation funds
Hazard mitigation funds
TRPA VMT reduction mitigation funds
City General Funds
Note that Measure P funds are prioritized to provide
recreation improvements first.

Legend
Recreation Center Event Space
Main Street Subsequent Phases
Camping Cabins
Lakeview Commons will be expanded to the east, left side of this photo. 1585
Phasing, FU NDING, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE | 67
Figure 27: Phasing Plan

PHASING PLAN

CAMPING
(TENT & RV)

CIVIC CENTER
MULTIGENERATIONAL

AQUATICS &

RECREATION
CENTER
HIGHWAY 50
HIGHWAY 50

HARRISON AVE

TALLAC AVE
RUFUS ALLEN BLVD..

RUFUS ALLEN BLVD.

TRANSIT
STOP

LAKEVIEW COMMONS

EXTENSION

TRANSIT
STOP

EXISTING SENIOR
CENTER
CABINS

PLAYGROUND
MUSEUM

ART CENTER

LAKEVIEW AVE

LIBRARY

LAKEVIEW

COMMONS

EXPANDED
CHAMPION’S
PLAZA

FLEXIBLE

EVENT SPACE

FITNESS
PLAY

NATURE &

ADVENTURE
PLAY

CAMPING
CABINS
“MAIN
STREET”

ICE ARENA

REPURPOSED
BLDG..

CULTURAL
HUB

LAKE TAHOE
0 ft 100 200
North
1586
68 | 56 ACRES MASTER PLAN

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
The master plan recommends that City and County staff
and representatives of elected officials work closely
to develop a strategy that incorporates the day to day
operations and maintenance considerations. The following Policies and Needs were developed from input given by
City staff as a starting point.

Policies

1. Monitor and manage tree health.
» Pre-Construction: Catalog and evaluate trees to
remove and trees to save on site. Establish tree
protection plan that is to remain in effect for the
duration of ALL construction activities, Consulting
Arborist should be available during construction
to advise on any pruning, tree protection, soil
compaction issues, or underground pruning that might
need to take place, or could otherwise alter tree
protection plan.
» Post-Construction: Monitor preserved trees for a
minimum of three years following turnover of project.

Schedule regular evaluations of landscape and
plantings to enforce any warranty claims. Ensure
watering is adequate. Ensure snow storage solutions
do not damage trees, displace mulching, or over
saturate planting sites during thaw.

2. Staff the Parks Department to meet the long term
needs of 56 Acres improvements.
» Maintenance Staffing Needs: Three, full time
Maintenance level 1 or 2 employees to assist with
janitorial/custodial needs for evenings, weekends, and
regularly scheduled days. One, full time Maintenance
level 3,4,or 5 to monitor and maintain site, potentially helping to direct staff depending on level of worker
staffed on site.
» Document all assets, amenities, and needs as they
are implemented, and revaluate on an annual basis.

3. Seek partnerships with stewardship groups and non
profit organizations.

4. Develop policy to permit special events.

5. Develop policy to contract with concessionaires.

6. Develop policy to fundraise for improvements and
maintenance.
» Any funds raised for Maintenance should be allocated
by Maintenance. This way, equipment needs are
not sacrificed for staff, and staffing needs will not be wasted on tools, etc.

Needs

1. Allow for a small location on site for maintenance of the campground, play areas, and grounds. The area
shall include a maintenance shed, or other, separate
facility that has power, heat, and some hard surface
surrounding it.

2. Maintain a space on site for up to three city snow
plows. Recognize the City’s stated intent to be fully
electric, make sure these sites can accommodate, or
include charging stations. These sites would be best if they allow covered or partially covered parking.

3. Additional Staff
» Maintenance Staffing Needs: Three, full time
Maintenance level 1 or 2 employees to assist with
janitorial/custodial needs for evenings, weekends, and
regularly scheduled days. One, full time Maintenance
level 3,4,or 5 to monitor and maintain site, potentially helping to direct staff depending on level of worker
staffed on site.

4. Equipment
» Two Gem Carts, miscellaneous small powered
equipment for landscape needs, Two to three tracked
walk behind snow blowers, small snow removal
tractor similar to the Holder.

5. Cost estimates for maintenance (2022 dollars).
• Equipment: $250,000
• Labor Fully Burdened (Annually): $300,000

6. Cost estimates for phasing to be developed prior to
implementation.
1587
Phasing, FU NDING, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE | 69
Photos of the inaugural Festival of WInter Lights, December 2021, located at the Cultural Hub of 56 Acres. 1588
56 ACRES

ENVISION

MASTER PLAN
1589
Perkins&Will
South Lake Tahoe Recreation Swim Center
Existing Building Conditional Assessment
Final Report
January 23, 2020

1590
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |2
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................................3 Section 1: Background..........................................................................................................................................................4 Purpose ..............................................................................................................................................................................4 Background .......................................................................................................................................................................4 Methodology.....................................................................................................................................................................5 Section 2: Cost Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................6 Cost Summary of Existing Building Renovation.............................................................................................................6 Cost Summary of New Recreation Center......................................................................................................................7 Cost Estimate for Existing Recreation Center Renovation ............................................................................................8 Cost Estimate assumptions ............................................................................................................................................18 Section 3: Building Assessment ........................................................................................................................................21 Code Compliance Assessment.......................................................................................................................................22 Compliance Options for existing building:...................................................................................................................23 Impacts on Building Renovation and Recommendations:..........................................................................................23 Existing and Accessibility Analysis.................................................................................................................................24 Section 4: Hazardous Materials Assessment..................................................................................................................28 Hazardous Materials Assessment .................................................................................................................................28 Impacts on Building Renovation:...................................................................................................................................29 Design Criteria.................................................................................................................................................................30 Summary ..........................................................................................................................................................................33 Section 6: Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Assessment .......................................................................................35 Observations ...................................................................................................................................................................35 Findings and Potential Issues.........................................................................................................................................37 Recommendations and Code Requirements ...............................................................................................................38 1591
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following conditional assessment of the existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Swim Center was conducted to identify the scope of work necessary to fully renovate the existing center, and to evaluate the cost of those improvements.

The assessment was conducted by Perkins&Will and Ward Young Architects, along with Sugarpine Engineering, Gabbart and Woods Engineering and DFH Cost Consulting. The consultant team conducted on-site visual assessment on December 5, 2019, and along with existing building documentation, prepared the following analysis.

The purpose of this assessment was to identify the cost difference between renovation of the existing center, and construction of a completely new center, on the current site, or another nearby location (undetermined). The previous planning process for the recreation center conducted on 2017 identified priority needs for a new center.

The cost estimates for the proposed new center were used for comparative purposes. Because many of the requested building components cannot fit within the existing center, the cost analysis assumes that the pool, gymnasium and running track would be newly cons tructed additions to the existing center.

Because the building never went through a major renovation since it’s construction in 1975, many of the original construction systems and materials are still in place. This brings a range of challenges from longevity, deterioration, code compliance, hazardous materials, and systems reaching the end of their useable life. If the building were to undergo a major renovation and addition, all of the building components and systems would require upgrades to current code and accessibility standards, as well as abatement of hazardous materials (asbestos) based on the report conducted by Environmental Testing & Consulting Inc.

The total estimated construction cost of the existing 22,213 square feet of building is $8,827,931. For the purposes of comparison, new construction of similar building components (including fitness spaces, multiuse rooms, offices, support areas) of approximately 23,000 square feet would cost an estimated $11,621,000. This equates to a cost differential of $2,793,069 between new and renovated construction for similar building area and components. These figures all represent direct construction costs, and do not included site construction, asbestos abatement, design and engineering fees, equipment or other project development costs. 1592
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |4
SECTION 1:BACKGROUND
Purpose
The City of South Lake Tahoe is faced with a decision to either build a new community recreation center on the current recreation and swim center site, or another potential site, or to renovate and expand the current recreation and pool building to accomplish a similar intent. The purpose of this report is to conduct a conditional assessment of the existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Swim Center to determine the cost and viability of renovating this structure to serve the long-term recreational needs of the community.

It is the purpose of this assessment to identify not only the necessary remediation and replacement, but to specifically identify the cost impact of those improvements. Depending on the type of use, and the anticipated scope of renovation, there are tiers of improvements that are necessary. The following types of use will determine the extent of the necessary remediation.
1) Do nothing
The existing building could continue in its current use and continue to function as a community center but minimal physical changes could occur without triggering code and accessibility improvements. The building and systems are still nearing their useable life, and would soon require significant remediation, but if no changes in use are proposed, no upgrades are specifically required. As long as no demolition disrupts the asbestos materials, they can remain in place. 2) Cosmetic improvements only
The building could also serve other similar uses and receive only cosmetic improvements such as paint and finishes installed over existing materials. Similar to option 1, only minimal changes could occur without triggering required upgrades. As long as no demolition disrupts the asbestos materials, they can remain in place.
3) Renovation/Addition
Completely renovate the existing building, and construct additions for the components that cannot fit in the existing structure including the new indoor pool, gymnasium and running track. The scope of the renovations assumes both remediation to current building code and accessibility standards, as well as replacement of materials and systems that are deteriorating or nearing the end of their usable life. The abatement of all asbestos is assumed as part of this option. The cost of this option is provided in Section 2 of this report.
4) Demolish and reconstruct a new facility
The entire building could also be demolished and reconstructed on either the current site, or another site. The cost of asbestos abatement would still be incurred to demolish the existing structure. The cost of new construction is also included in in Section 2 of this report.

Background
The existing structure was built in 1975, with limited improvements and regular ongoing maintenance over the life of the building. Because the building never went through a major renovation, many of the original construction systems and materials are still in place. This brings a range of challenges from longevity, deterioration, code compliance, hazardous materials, and systems reaching the end of their useable life.

The current building is a single-story structure constructed primarily of glu-laminated timber framing, stud framed interior and exterior walls, clad in wood shake shingles. The total building area is approximately 32,017 square feet. The pool complex is comprised of 11,360 square feet, surrounded by an exterior wall enclosure, and 1593
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |5
an air-supported fabric roof structure covered seasonally. The remaining 20,657 square feet of building contains offices, classrooms, locker rooms, a gymnasium and other support areas for storage and building systems.

The existing site is asphalt paved with a large number of evergreen trees throughout the lot. Although the parking would likely be modified with a major addition renovation, the scope and cost of this work was not part of this study.

Methodology
The findings of this report are based on review of the existing building drawings, engineering judgment, visual observation, review of the works of others, and engineering experience. Items were evaluated to reasonable accuracy based on available information, and one visual review of the facility , and on-site visual inspection conducted on December 5, 2019. Many of the findings could be subject to interpretation and differing opinion could impact the recommendations and cost impacts, but the findings represent an objective professional opinion of the building conditions.

Documents
The report was created using available information in documents provided by the City. For the purposes of this initial study, the accuracy and detail contained in the documents is sufficient to draw the necessary conclusions.

All recommendations based on the information contained in these documents in subject to the validity of the content, and should be independently verified prior to any further design or construction.

The following documents were referenced as part of this report:
• Existing building construction documents by Clarence Feliciano and Schuler L. Jeffries AIA & Associates dated February 7, 1974
• Existing Conditions Assessment Report by Williams + Paddon Architects and Planners dated March 2016 • Needs Assessment Study: Swimming Pool by Aquatic Design Group dated March 2016 • Asbestos Renovation Survey by Environmental Testing & Consulting Inc. dated September 17, 2019 • Lead Sampling Survey by Environmental Testing & Consulting Inc. dated September 17, 2019 1594
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |6
SECTION 2: COST ANALYSIS
Cost Summary of Existing Building Renovation
Building Component Area (gross sf) Construction Cost
Existing Building Renovation Cost 22,213 $8,827,931
(Includes Fitness, Community, Administration and Support Spaces) New Pool Complex Construction: 19,000 $9,660,000
New Gymnasium and Running Track Construction: 24,000 $6,281,000 Construction Cost of Renovation and Addition Recreation Center 65,213 $24,768,931 Cost Difference of renovation/addition versus newly constructed recreation center Renovation addition recreation center 65,213 $24,768,931 New recreation center 66,000 $27,562,000
Cost Difference -($ 2,793,069)
Diagram of Conceptual Renovation and Addition Plan
1595
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |7
Cost Summary of New Recreation Center
Building Component Area Total Cost
Fitness, Community, Administration and Support Spaces 23,000 $11,621,000 New Pool Complex Construction: 19,000 $9,660,000
New Gymnasium and Running Track Construction: 24,000 $6,281,000 Total Construction Cost of New Recreation Center Building 66,000 $27,562,000 1596
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |8
Cost Estimate for Existing Recreation Center Renovation NOTE: This cost estimate is preliminary in nature, based on the conceptual scope of work descriptions prepared by Perkins & Will and its consultants. It is subject to variation as the details of the design are finalized, as well as timing, market conditions, and phasing.

UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANT. UOM COST COST

COMMENTS /

ASSUMPTIONS
Note: The following estimate is based upon the assumption that an abatement contractor will have removed All asbestos and lead containing materials prior to the start of this work. This includes wood shakes, Redwood siding, and underlayment on roofs and exterior walls, all drywall on walls and ceilings, all Asbestos-containing floor coverings and mastic, fire doors, and ceramic wall tile.

GENERAL ITEMS
Barricades / Fences / Temp. Signs Excluded
Assumed to be with new
construction
General Conditions / Supervision 10 MO $60,000.00 $600,000 Small trailer in staging
area
Storage Units for Salvaged Materials 18 MO $500.00 $9,000 Layout of Demolition / Finish Work 26 WKS $3,400.00 $88,400 Full time layout /
supervision of demolition
Gravel for Temp Parking / Restore Excluded
Staging area assumed to
be with sitework
Subtotal of General Items $697,400

SITE CLEARING AND DEMOLITION
Assume this work is part of the new building project
DEMOLITION OF POOL AND STRUCTURE AND SEPARATION OF COLUMN LINE 22 WALL Disconnect Utilities to Pool
Excavate/Cut/Cap U.G. Water Lines 3 EA $500.00 $1,500
Excavate/Cut/Cap Sewer Main 4 EA $500.00 $2,000
Cut/Remove Sewer Vent Lines 4 EA $500.00 $2,000
Excavate/Cut/Cap Gas Main 1 EA $500.00 $500
Excavate and Remove UG Piping 702 LF $25.00 $17,550
Disconnect Electrical Services 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500
Remove Gallery Walkway and Corbels at Column Line 22 Wall Assumes C.L. 22 wall can
remain as is and
Fire Extinguisher Cabinets 2 EA $150.00 $300
becomes a new interior
wall at new pool
Drinking Fountains in CMU Chase 2 EA $500.00 $1,000
Hose Bibbs in CMU Chase 2 EA $500.00 $1,000
1597
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |9
CMU Chases at Drinking Fountains 43 SF $5.00 $214
Misc. Wall Mounted Items 1 LS $500.00 $500
Lobby Entry Doors 2 EA $150.00 $300
Salvage Sight Rail Wood Pieces 2 EA $100.00 $200
Lobby Entry Hollow Metal Frame 103 SF $5.00 $514
Sloped Plaster Soffit at Lobby Entry 60 SF $10.00 $600
Soffit Framing at Lobby Entry 40 SF $5.00 $200
Plywood Diaphragm at Lobby Entry 59 SF $5.00 $294
Wall and Framing at Lobby Entry 116 SF $3.50 $406
Glass and Frames at Room 48 81 SF $5.00 $404
Countertop / Supports in Room 48 7 LF $50.00 $350
Sawcut Conc. Knee wall at Room 48 7 VF $50.00 $350
Remove Conc. Knee wall at Room 48 44 SF $5.00 $222
Sawcut Slab on Grade in Office 48 7 LF $50.00 $350
Revolving Door / Framing at Air Lock 1 EA $500.00 $500
Emergency Pool Exit Door / Frame 1 EA $250.00 $250
Cut Wall Framing Above Exit Door 8 VF $50.00 $400
Sawcut 6" Upper Wall at Emerg. Exit 5 VF $75.00 $375
Sawcut CMU Wall at Emergency Exit 2 VF $100.00 $200
Hand Excavate at Foundation 1 LS $250.00 $250
Sawcut 10" Fdn Wall at Emerg. Exit 3 VF $100.00 $300
Sawcut 12"Footing at Emergency Exit 3 LF $125.00 $375
Cut Roof and Framing at C. L. 22 & B 11 LF $50.00 $550
Sawcut 6" Upper Wall at 22 & B 5 VF $75.00 $375
Hand Excavate at Planter 1 LS $50.00 $50
Sawcut CMU Planter Wall 3 VF $75.00 $225
Sawcut 12" Planter Grade Beam 4 VF $125.00 $500
Sawcut 12" Planter Slab 3 LF $100.00 $300
Sawcut Entry Walk at Planter 7 LF $50.00 $350
Hand Excavate at Foundation 1 LS $250.00 $250
Sawcut 10" Fdn Wall at 22 & B 3 VF $100.00 $300
Sawcut 12"Footing at 22 & B 3 LF $125.00 $375
Shore Gallery Deck During Sawcuts 628 SF $20.00 $12,560 Sawcut Pool Gallery Deck at CL 22 115 LF $75.00 $8,625
Sawcut Deck Support Beams - 12" 4 VF $200.00 $800
Sawcut Deck Support Corbels - 16" 32 VF $200.00 $6,400
Pool Demolition
Disconnect Electrical Connections 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 Disconnect Plumbing 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500
Pool Equipment and Exposed Piping 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 Wood Roof Structure 3030 SF $3.00 $9,090
Wood Wall Structures 1653 SF $2.00 $3,306
Gallery Deck and Supporting Walls 4734 SF $15.00 $71,010 Pool Deck and Foundations 8722 SF $5.00 $43,610
Pool Shell and Buried Piping 4069 SF $10.00 $40,690
1598
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |10
Close Existing Openings in Column Line 22 Wall
Assume single pane
aluminum storefront
At North End of Lobby 103 SF $65.00 $6,678
Reinstall Salvaged Sight Rail Pieces 2 EA $150.00 $300
At Office Room 48 48 SF $65.00 $3,109
Close opening at
removed Counting Area
At Air Lock Door 46 SF $65.00 $2,961
Replace with storefront
and two doors
Storefront Doors 4 EA $3,500.00 $14,000 Excludes panic hardware Add Shear Reinforcement to Column Line 22 CMU Walls Excluded Assume existing wall is
sufficient
Subtotal of Pool Demolition and Separation at Column Line 22 $292,317

EXTERIOR ENVELOPE MODIFICATIONS
Remove Wood Shake Roofing, Wall Siding, and Underlayment Excluded Separate budget Exterior Demolition
Built-up Flat Roofing
Multi-Use Area 4740 SF $3.00 $14,220
Fan Room 102 833 SF $3.00 $2,499
Central Area 10630 SF $3.00 $31,890
Damaged 3/4" Plywood Sheathing 1620 SF $1.50 $2,430
Assume 10% of flat roof
area
Sheet Metal Roofing at Multi-Use
At Fan Room Above Multi-Use 106 SF $7.50 $792
Above Column Line 22 Wall 162 SF $7.50 $1,215
Remove Skylights and Metal Frames
Wood trim at tops of
walls to remain
Central Area 18 EA $225.00 $4,050
North Slope by Pool Gallery 18 EA $200.00 $3,600
Temporary Opening Protection 738 SF $5.00 $3,690
Gypsum Sheathing at Flat Soffits
To allow access for
sprayed insulation
Sloped Soffits Excluded
Assume existing to
remain
Sloped Soffit at Multi-Use 144 SF $2.00 $288 Along south wall Flat Soffit 1602 SF $0.75 $1,202
Flat Soffit at Multi-Use Exit Doors 55 SF $2.00 $110
Flat Soffits at Building Entries 430 SF $1.50 $645
At Gable Ends 41 SF $4.00 $164
Remove Exterior Doors and Windows (Except Column Line 22) Salvage Interior Wood Trim Pieces 487 LF $2.50 $1,218
Type 2 Windows - 9 EA 326 SF $5.00 $1,631
Type 3 Windows - 12 EA 440 SF $5.00 $2,199
Type 5 Window - 1 EA 36 SF $5.00 $178
Hollow Metal Entry Doors/Closers 8 EA $100.00 $800
Salvage Sight Rail Wood Pieces 8 EA $100.00 $800
1599
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |11
Entry Hollow Metal Frames - 4 EA 405 SF $5.00 $2,024
Clean Floor Closer Recesses 8 EA $30.00 $240
Hollow Metal Exit Doors 11 EA $75.00 $825
Hollow Metal Single Door Frames 3 EA $150.00 $450
Hollow Metal Double Door Frames 4 EA $150.00 $600
Temporary Closures in Exterior 1456 SF $2.50 $3,641
To protect interior from
weather
Clean Out Space Between Planters and Wall Sheathing
Assume planters to
remain in place
Salvage Cap Block at Wood Walls 187 LF $6.00 $1,122 Clean for reuse Vacuum Out Sand Filler at Walls 74 CF $35.00 $2,592
Sand in space between
planter & sheathing
Repair Waterproofing at Planters Excluded
Assume waterproofing is
intact
Replace Roofing
Repl. 3/4" Plywood Roof Sheathing 1620 SF $5.00 $8,102
Where removed at
damaged areas
Membrane Roofing with Perimeter Flashings, Penetration Flashings, and R-30 Insulation Raise Roof Drain Elevations 22 EA $800.00 $17,600
Increase Size of Roof Drain Piping 445 LF $70.00 $31,150 Remove and replace
with 1" larger pipe
Additional Overflow Drains 5 EA $1,500.00 $7,500
Multi-Use Area 4740 SF $15.00 $71,100
Fan Room 102 833 SF $15.00 $12,495
Central Area 10630 SF $15.00 $159,450
Sheet Metal Roofing with 3" Nailable Insulation and Ice and Water Shield To Replace Removed Sheet Metal Roofing
At Multi-Use Above Fan Room 106 SF $15.00 $1,583
Above Column Line 22 Wall 162 SF $20.00 $3,240
To Replace Wood Shakes
At Multi-Use 4898 SF $12.00 $58,777
Central Area East / West Sides 1456 SF $12.00 $17,477
Building Entries 1625 SF $15.00 $24,370
Central Area Skylight Monitors 619 SF $15.00 $9,290
Central Area Fan Room 577 SF $15.00 $8,654
North Slope by Pool Gallery 1843 SF $15.00 $27,645
Nailable Rigid Insulation - 3" Thick 11286 SF $4.00 $45,144 Additional insulation
sprayed from underside
Ice and Water Shield 11286 SF $3.00 $33,858
Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim
Cap / Counter at Membrane Roofs 1304 LF $25.00 $32,600
Drip / Edge at Roof Perimeter 616 LF $25.00 $15,400
Outside Corners / Hips / Ridges 775 LF $30.00 $23,250
Valley Flashing 87 LF $30.00 $2,610
Internal Gutters at Entries 114 LF $50.00 $5,700
Remove and replace with
deeper gutters
Skylight Opening Perimeters 326 LF $20.00 $6,520
Replace Skylights
1600
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |12
Build Up Curb Heights
Attach a 4" x 12" to
existing frame piece
Central Area Monitors 168 LF $25.00 $4,200
North Slope by Pool Gallery 268 LF $25.00 $6,688
Flat Translucent Panel Skylights
Kalwall or equal -
mounted on wood curbs
Central Area Monitors 192 SF $90.00 $17,280
North Slope by Pool Gallery 468 SF $90.00 $42,120
Replace Soffits
Assuming removed due
to asbestos felt
Gypsum Sheathing Under Soffit
Panels
Sloped Soffits Excluded
Assume existing to
remain
Sloped Soffit at Multi-Use 144 SF $3.00 $433 Along south wall Flat Soffit 1602 SF $2.50 $4,005
Flat Soffit at Multi-Use Exit Doors 55 SF $2.50 $138
Flat Soffits at Building Entries 430 SF $2.50 $1,075
At Gable Ends 41 SF $5.00 $205
Soffit Boards
Assume Hardie panel or
similar
Sloped Soffits 1411 SF $4.50 $6,350
Sloped Soffits at Multi-Use 144 SF $4.50 $649 Along south wall Flat Soffits 1602 SF $4.00 $6,408
Flat Soffits at Multi-Use 55 SF $4.00 $220 At exit doors in south wall Flat Soffits at Building Entries 430 SF $4.00 $1,720
At entry doors in west
wall
At Gable Ends 41 SF $6.00 $246
Plywood Sheathing at Light Cove 287 SF $3.50 $1,005 1/2" sheathing Sloped Soffits at Light Coves 633 SF $5.00 $3,167 At building entries Vent Screen at Soffit 490 LF $5.00 $2,450
Trim Pieces
Assume Hardie trim
material
Perimeter Fascia Board 510 LF $40.00 $20,400 14" wide
Trim Under Gable Ends of Soffit 41 LF $10.00 $410
Trim at Vent Screen 1470 LF $8.00 $11,760
At Edges of Soffit Panels 1125 LF $7.00 $7,875
Fascia Board at Edge of Light Cove 128 LF $30.00 $3,840 12" wide Sloped Soffit at Light Coves 288 LF $10.00 $2,880
Flat Soffits at Building Entries 220 LF $7.00 $1,540
At entry doors in west
wall
Bottom of Bulkhead Walls at Entry 56 LF $10.00 $560
Repaint Louvers in Soffits 4 EA $150.00 $600
Repair Exposed Roof Beam Ends
Epoxy Wood Filler in Beam Ends 64 EA $50.00 $3,200
To repair weather
damage
Sheet Metal Cap Flashings on Beams 64 EA $150.00 $9,600 Restain Beam Ends 64 EA $25.00 $1,600
1601
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |13
Replace Exterior Windows and Doors (Except Column Line 22) New Storefront Windows in Lieu of Original Hollow Metal Punched Window Openings 802 SF $85.00 $68,140
Building Entries at West Side 405 SF $85.00 $34,403
Sill Flashings Under Storefront 179 LF $20.00 $3,580
Storefront Doors w/Exit Hardware 8 EA $5,000.00 $40,000 New Hollow Metal Doors and Frames in Existing Openings
Hollow Metal Single Door Frames 3 EA $450.00 $1,350
Hollow Metal Double Door Frames 4 EA $500.00 $2,000
Hollow Metal Exit Doors 11 EA $750.00 $8,250
New Exit Door Hardware 11 EA $1,500.00 $16,500
Paint New Hollow Metal Frames 7 EA $60.00 $420
Paint New Hollow Metal Doors 11 EA $75.00 $825
Perimeter Membrane Flashings 625 LF $2.50 $1,563
Repair Damaged Plywood Sheathing on Sloped Roofs and Under Siding Assume 5% of area
damaged
Remove Existing Wall Sheathing 904 SF $2.50 $2,260
Replace Existing Sheathing 904 SF $5.00 $4,521
Modify Foundation Insulation Excluded
Assume existing is
sufficient
Insulate Exterior Walls and Sloped
Roofs
Except Column Line 22
wall
Sprayed Air Barrier on Sheathing
Under Sloped Metal Roofing 6504 SF $4.50 $29,268
On Sheathing Above Soffits 4782 SF $4.50 $21,519
On vertical walls above
soffits
Under Metal Wall Siding 3261 SF $4.50 $14,672
Under Fiber Cement Board Siding 8319 SF $4.50 $37,437
Rigid Insulation on Walls - 3"
Balance is sprayed
insulation
Under Metal Siding 3261 SF $4.00 $13,042
Under Fiber Cement Board Siding 8319 SF $4.00 $33,278
Spray Insulation Behind Planters 436 SF $5.00 $2,179
To fill void where sand is
removed
Spray Insulation in Framing
Under Sloped Roofing 6504 SF $2.50 $16,260
Above Soffits 4782 SF $2.50 $11,955
On vertical walls above
soffits
Under Metal Wall Siding 3261 SF $2.50 $8,151
Under Fiber Cement Board Siding 8319 SF $2.50 $20,798
Furring and Drywall on Ext. Walls 1257 SF $8.00 $10,058 To cover insul. in Boiler
Room, Hallway, etc.

New Exterior Wall Siding
Roof Gable and Step Walls
Metal siding on furring
over insulation
Fan Room Above Multi-Use 96 SF $30.00 $2,891
Gable Ends at Multi-Use 648 SF $28.00 $18,144
East Side at Roof Notches 96 SF $30.00 $2,869
1602
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |14
Gables at East Side Roof Notches 218 SF $30.00 $6,543
Vertical Walls of Boiler Room 345 SF $28.00 $9,671
Vertical Walls Above Transformer 247 SF $28.00 $6,911
Roof Step Wall at Multi-Use 827 SF $28.00 $23,156
Fan Room Above Central Area 406 SF $30.00 $12,174
Gables at Skylight Monitors 234 SF $32.00 $7,488
Trim Strip at Base of Wall Panels 214 LF $60.00 $12,840 To simulate redwood trim
piece
Repaint Exposed Wall Louvers 8 EA $150.00 $1,200
Fiber Cement Wall Siding and Trim
Assume Hardie board
siding with trim strips
Multi-Use Area 5339 SF $12.00 $64,073
West Elevation 767 SF $12.00 $9,206
East Elevation 2213 SF $12.00 $26,553
Exterior Columns at Building Entry 86 SF $30.00 $2,573
Plywood Sheathing Under Siding 8319 SF $4.00 $33,278
To attach battens, trim,
etc.

Repaint Exposed Wall Louvers 2 EA $250.00 $500 At Boiler Room Caulking and Sealants for Exterior 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 Subtotal of Exterior Envelope Modifications $1,523,752

MISCELLANEOUS INTERIOR DEMOLITION AND STRUCTURAL UPGRADES Remove items not
containing asbestos
Removal of Loose Equipment and Furnishings By Owner
Demolition in Fan and Storage Rooms
For access to sprayed
insulation
Wood Base in Multi-Use Fan Room 79 LF $1.00 $79
Multi-Use Fan Room Wall Drywall 844 SF $1.00 $844
Multi-Use Fan Room Ceiling Drywall 877 SF $1.25 $1,096
Remove/Reinstall Soffit Louver 1 LS $500.00 $500
For drywall material
handling
Multi-Use Storage Wall Drywall 144 SF $1.00 $144
Multi-Use Storage Ceiling Drywall 627 SF $1.25 $784 For fire sprinkler access Wood Base in Center Area Fan Room 111 LF $1.00 $111
Center Area Fan Room Wall Drywall 992 SF $1.00 $992
Center Area Fan Room Clng Drywall 833 SF $1.25 $1,041
Remove/Reinstall Wall Louver 1 LS $500.00 $500
For drywall material
handling
Dumpsters for Drywall Work 2 EA $500.00 $1,000
Demolition in Trash Room
For access to sprayed
insulation
Plaster on Walls 163 SF $5.00 $817
Plaster on Ceiling 109 SF $6.00 $653
Remove Finishes, Doors, and Interior Partitions Throughout Remainder of Building Miscellaneous Visqueen Enclosures 1 LS $500.00 $500
Miscellaneous Barricades / Closures 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500 1603
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |15
Multi-Use Area 6101 SF $4.00 $24,404
Locker Room and Restroom Spaces 1914 SF $15.00 $28,710
Remove CMU walls and
floor slab
Balance of Center Area Space 10675 SF $5.00 $53,375
Not including Trash and
Boiler Rooms
Cut New Openings in CMU Walls 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000
To allow for new floor
plan
Upgrade Existing CMU Shear Walls
Preliminary Investigations 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000
To determine reinforcing
/ grouting pattern
Prepare Existing CMU Walls 6968 SF $1.75 $12,194
Reinforcing Mesh - 2" x 2" #12 6968 SF $2.50 $17,419
Protect Wood Ceiling Deck 2372 SF $2.50 $5,930
To protect exposed T&G
wood ceiling
Sprayed Gunite 4" Thick on One Side 6968 SF $6.00 $41,807 From floor to main roof
line
Premium for Close Tolerance Finish 6968 SF $3.00 $20,903 To allow for final finish
such as furring
Allowance for Foundation Upgrades 1 LS $75,000.00 $75,000 In selected locations
where needed
Allowance for Additional Anchorage 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 At tops of CMU walls Upgrade Existing Plywood Shear Walls and Roof Decks
Increase nailing per
Structural Report
Multi-Use Exterior Walls 8277 SF $0.10 $828
Multi-Use Roof Deck 4740 SF $0.10 $474
Multi-Use Sloped Roof Deck 4898 SF $0.10 $490
Center Area Exterior Walls 3774 SF $0.10 $377
Center Area Interior Shear Walls 3139 SF $0.10 $314
Diaphragms Btwn Main / Upper Roofs 3751 SF $0.20 $750 In space between roofs Center Area Roof Deck 10630 SF $0.10 $1,063
Center Area Fan Room Roof Deck 833 SF $0.10 $83
North Sloped Roof by Pool Gallery 1843 SF $0.10 $184
Allowance for Added Anchor Bolts 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 Allowance for Additional Tiedowns 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 Allowance for Structural Modifications 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 Beams, etc. to
accommodate new
program
Subtotal of Interior Demolition and Structural Upgrades $394,866

INTERIOR FINISHES AND MEP MODIFICATIONS
Repair Finishes in Fan and Multi-Use Storage Rooms
Where removed for
insulation access
Wood Base in Multi-Use Fan Room 79 LF $20.00 $1,580
Multi-Use Fan Room Wall Drywall 844 SF $5.00 $4,219
Multi-Use Fan Room Ceiling Drywall 877 SF $6.00 $5,260
Multi-Use Storage Wall Drywall 144 SF $5.00 $720
Multi-Use Storage Ceiling Drywall 627 SF $6.00 $3,762
1604
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |16
Wood Base in Center Area Fan Room 111 LF $20.00 $2,220
Center Area Fan Room Wall Drywall 992 SF $5.00 $4,961
Center Area Fan Room Clg Drywall 833 SF $6.00 $4,998
New Flooring in Multi-Use Storage 620 SF $6.00 $3,720
New Rubber Base in MU Storage 160 LF $2.50 $400
Repaint Wood Trim in Fan Rooms 258 LF $2.50 $645
Repaint Drywall in Fan Rooms 6053 SF $1.00 $6,053
Paint Misc. Items in Fan Rooms 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000
Repair Finishes in Trash Room
Where removed for
insulation access
Plaster on Walls 163 SF $10.00 $1,634
Plaster on Ceiling 109 SF $12.00 $1,306
Epoxy Paint in Trash Room 422 SF $2.50 $1,055
Repair Finishes in Boiler Room
Where modified for new
insulation
Paint Drywall Furring 623 SF $1.25 $778
Added to cover sprayed
insulation
Paint Exposed CMU / Gunite 560 SF $2.00 $1,120
Paint Exposed Wood Ceiling 610 SF $1.50 $915
Paint Exposed Wall Louvers 2 EA $250.00 $500
New Rubber Base on Furred Wall 53 LF $2.50 $133
Allowances for Finishes in Existing Spaces - New Partitions, Ceilings, Doors, Flooring, Millwork, and Specialty Items Multi-Use Area 6101 SF $50.00 $305,050
Locker Room and Restroom Spaces 1914 SF $250.00 $478,500 Balance of Center Area Space 10675 SF $60.00 $640,500
Temporary Heat for Finishes 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
Allowance for Specialties
Allowance for Interior Graphics 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 Includes paint and wall
mounted panels
Banners Hung From Ceiling 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
Acoustical Wall Panels 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000
Fire Sprinklers
New Water Main to Supply Sprinklers Excluded
Assume extended from
new addition
Dry System Valves and Compressor 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000 Dry Sprinklers in Soffit Areas 4317 SF $8.00 $34,535
Multi-Use Fan and Storage Rooms 1504 SF $5.00 $7,518
Center Area Fan Room and Soffits 310 SF $6.00 $1,860
Multi-Use Area 6101 SF $5.00 $30,505
Cavity Between Main / Lower Roofs 10630 SF $6.50 $69,095 Center Area 12589 SF $5.00 $62,945
Fire Pump Excluded
Assume local water
pressure is sufficient
Plumbing In Center Area only
Remove Existing Piping Distribution 12589 SF $1.00 $12,589 Assume fixtures removed
w/interior demo
New Piping and Fixtures
Assume reusing existing
3" water service
1605
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |17
Locker Room and Restroom Spaces 1914 SF $35.00 $66,990
Balance of Center Area Space 10675 SF $5.00 $53,375
Connections to HVAC Equipment 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
HVAC
Assume new system is
forced air vs. radiant
Disconnect Radiant Heat System 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500
Remove Equipment from Fan Rooms 2 EA $25,000.00 $50,000 Remove Existing Ductwork / Piping 21746 SF $3.00 $65,237 New HVAC Equip/Piping/Ductwork 21746 SF $32.00 $695,857 Assume equipment in
existing mechanical
rooms
Premium for Ducted Returns 21746 SF $5.00 $108,728
Reconnect Radiant Heat at Entries 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 Roof Flashing at New Flues 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500
Painting of Exposed Piping Excluded Assume pipe is insulated Painting of Exposed Ductwork 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
Excluded in Mechanical
Rooms
Temperature Controls 21746 SF $5.00 $108,728
Testing and Balancing 21746 SF $2.00 $43,491
Electrical and Low Voltage Systems
Temp. Electrical Power / Lighting 21746 SF $0.50 $10,873 Rem. Exist. Fixtures/Conduit/Wiring 21746 SF $1.00 $21,746 Rem. Exist. Low Voltage Cabling 21746 SF $0.50 $10,873
New Distribution Panels 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
Assume existing service
can be reused
New Lighting and Controls 21746 SF $12.00 $260,946
New Power Distribution 21746 SF $6.00 $130,473
Connect HVAC Equipment 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
Fire Alarm System 21746 SF $5.00 $108,728 Assume new system New MDF / IDF Equipment 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
Assume existing services
can be reused
Rough-in IT Conduit and Boxes 21746 SF $1.50 $32,618
New Structured Cabling 21746 SF $1.50 $32,618
A/V Conduit and Cabling 21746 SF $1.50 $32,618
For sound systems and
televisions
A/V Equipment Excluded Assume with FF & E
Allowance for Sound Systems 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
In activity and multipurpose rooms
Rough-in Security Conduit and Boxes 21746 SF $1.00 $21,746 Security Cabling and Equipment 21746 SF $1.50 $32,618
Access control and
cameras
First Responder Radio Amplification System Excluded Assume not required Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Excluded
Assume with site
improvements
Standby Electrical Generator Excluded Assume not required Subtotal of Interior Finishes and MEP Modifications $3,859,839 1606
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |18

BASE ESTIMATE SUMMARY
General Items $697,400
Pool Demolition and Separation of Structure at C.L. 22 $292,317 Exterior Envelope Modifications $1,523,752
Interior Demolition and Structural Upgrades $394,866
Interior Finishes and MEP Modifications $3,859,839
Subtotal $6,768,173
Indirect Costs - Insurance/Bonds/Permits-7% $473,772
Subtotal $7,241,945
General Contractor Overhead and Profit-6% $434,517
Subtotal $7,676,462
Design and Estimating Contingency-15% $1,151,469

Total Estimated Base Construction Cost $8,827,931
Remaining Building is 22,213 sq. ft. $397.42 /SF
Cost Estimate assumptions
• This estimate is based on the assumption this work will be part of a larger concurrent project that will include an addition to the existing building and reconstruction of the parking lot. The duration of construction will vary depending upon the phasing required. The General Conditions (supervision) in this estimate are based on an assumed duration of 10 months, which would be a portion of the larger project. • The existing building will be vacated during construction Prior to the start of this work, all materials containing asbestos or other hazardous materials will be removed and safely disposed of by an abatement contractor specialized in such removal. This will include removal of all wood shakes and redwood siding and underlying building paper; all interior drywall with texture, down to the underlying framing; all floor coverings adhered with mastic containing asbestos fibers; all asbestos-containing material in the pool area; and composite fire doors. Items that must be removed to gain access, such as cabinetry and wood trim shall also be disposed of prior to the start of this project. • This estimate includes demolition and removal of the existing Pool Gallery structure, pool deck, pool shell, and underground piping to make it ready for construction of the new addition. The common wall on Column Line 22 will left in place, but the suspended deck, supporting corbels, and windows and doors in this wall will be removed. It is assumed this wall will be incorporated into the new addition (but be separated by an expansion joint).
• Structural upgrades include the application of a 4" thick layer of reinforced sprayed concrete to upgrade existing CMU shear walls, additional nailing of existing wood shear walls and diaphragms, and allowances for additional attachment of shear walls to the existing structure and additional attachment of shear walls to existing foundations. It has been assumed the existing foundations are generally adequate to withstand the increased design loads, but an allowance has been included to upgrade a portion of existin g foundation locations.
• It is assumed the new program can be configured to work around existing shear wall locations, with only minor openings required.
1607
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |19
• Allowances have been included to remove and replace up to ten percent (10%) of existing upper roo f sheathing and five percent (5%) of sheathing under sloped roofs and vertical walls. No allowance is included for repair of the main roof tongue and groove decking, except for within the interior finish allowances. • Existing floor slabs have been assumed to be left in place except at restroom and locker room areas, where floor slabs will be removed to allow for new sloped floors. These new floor slabs are included in the finish allowance for these spaces.
• New wall and roof insulation, air barrier, and upgraded doors, windows, and skylights will be provided for all exterior walls and roofs except for the wall on Column Line 22. New uninsulated storefront is included to close existing openings in this wall, but no insulation or finish is provided. It has been assumed the existing foundation insulation is sufficient.
• The new exterior envelope will consist of membrane roofing over 6" of rigid insulation on flat roofs; metal roofing over 3" of nailable rigid insulation on sloped roofs; metal siding over 3" of rigid insulation on gables and vertical walls; and cementitious fiber board siding over 3" of rigid insulation on walls currently covered with redwood siding. A sprayed air barrier will be applied to the substrate prior to installation of the rigid insulation (except a loose air barrier on flat roofs), and sprayed insulation will be applied to the interior surface of the exterior framed walls (except under flat roofs). Drywall will be replaced on the interior side of these exterior walls. Aluminum storefront framing has been assumed in lieu of the original hollow metal frames to improve thermal performance.
• Areas that are likely to remain in their current use, such as fan rooms, Multi-Use storage rooms, Boiler Room, and Trash Room will be left as is, except for modifications required to insulate the exterior walls and roofs, and be restored to their original condition.
• All work is to be done during normal business hours, without significant overtime or night work. • No provisions are included in this estimate for temporary space for Recreation Center personnel or storage of Owner equipment.
• As part of the new addition and site improvements, it will be necessary to extend a new water service main to supply fire sprinklers for both the new addition and this existing building. It has been assumed this new water main will be part of the site improvements, and not included as part of this work. The new Fire Sprinkler Entry Room and Fire Department response point will be in the new addition. • Fire sprinklers have been included as required by code for both for the main level and the interstitial space between the main and upper roofs. A separate dry fire sprinkler system has also been included for exterior soffits and concealed soffit framing.
• It has been assumed the existing 3" domestic water service, sanitary sewer service, electrical power, natural gas, and tele/data services are sufficient for this building and can be left as is and modified to reflect any new conditions.
• New HVAC equipment has been assumed to be located in the existing fan and boiler rooms. All existing equipment would be removed A premium for return ductwork has been included, versus the use of return air plenums, due to the wood structure.
• See the body of the estimate for further assumptions / inclusions / exclusions. • Items marked by "Allowance" were non-quantifiable.
• This estimate is based upon summer 2020 construction costs. If the project start date is after that, an escalation factor of five percent (5%) per year must be added. 1608
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |20
• There were many assumptions required to prepare this cost estimate, some of which may not be correct. To attempt to account for this uncertainty, a contingency of fifteen percent (15%) has been included.

Exclusions
• Architect & Engineering or Other Consultant Fees
• Testing / Asbestos or Hazardous Materials Mitigation
• Field Inspections and Quality Control Testing
• Significant Temporary Heat or Cold Weather Protection • Planning and Zoning Permits, Fees, and Approvals
• Upgrades to the Electrical, Natural Gas, Water, Telephone, Cable TV, and Fiber Optic Services to the Building • Builder's Risk Insurance on the New Addition
• Reinforcement of the Existing Structure to Support New Snow Drift Loads • Additional Insulation on Foundation Walls or Under Floor Slabs • Additional Draft Stops in Soffits and Ceiling Cavities • ADA Door Operators
• Audio / Visual Equipment, Except for an Allowance for Sound Systems • Elevators or ADA Lifts
• Fire Pump or Standby Generator
• Removal of Existing Loose Furniture and Equipment
• Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF&E), Including All Fitness and Weight Equipment 1609
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |21
SECTION 3: BUILDING ASSESSMENT
• Code Compliance Assessment
• Compliance Plans
• Existing Accessibility Analysis
1610
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |22
Code Compliance Assessment
Assumptions
The Project consists of an alteration and addition to the existing Recreation Center Facility. The multi-use, administrative and locker room areas of the existing building will be retained and altered to accommodate a portion of the program requirements for the new facility. The balance of the program requirements are to be included in an addition to the building. The existing swimming pool and structure located to the north of the grid line 22 are to be eliminated and replaced with a new aquatic natatorium in the new addition. • There is no change in Occupancy Types from those at existing with Recreation & Swim Complex • Structural changes do not exceed 50%
Existing Conditions
• Building Area= 32,017 SF, Single Story
• Not currently protected by automatic fire sprinkler system (AFS) • Occupancy Type: Assembly A-3
• Type of Construction: Type VB
• 30 ft open on all sides of the building
Existing area approximations
• Multi-use Activity Areas, Administration 20,657 sf
• Swimming Pool Complex 11,360 sf
• Total 32,017 sf
Allowable Area and construction Type Analysis
Applicable Codes - 2019 California Building Code (CBC)
Allowable Building Area options based on Type of Construction:
• Type VB-NS
Area factor from Tables 506.2 = 6,000 sf
Allowable area increase (separation all sides)
6,000 sf+ (6,000 x .75) = 10,500 sf
• Type VB -w/Automatic Fire System (AFS)
Area factor from Table 506.2 = 24,000 sf
Allowable area increase (separation all sides)
24,000 sf+ (6,000 x .75) = 28,500 sf
Note: If no building addition or expansion is planned, the existing building would meet the allowable area limitations of Type VB construction, if an automatic fire sprinkler system is installed.

If a building addition is planned, the allowable area increase would decrease depending on the linear footage of existing perimeter. Assuming expansion on two sides (pool expansion in current location, gymnasium expansion elsewhere.

Existing building perimeter = 716 lin. ft.

Amount of perimeter affected by an addition = 288 lin. ft.

Allowable increase due to separation = (288/716 lf x 6000) = 2413 sf 24,000 sf+ 2,413 = = 26,413 sf
• Type IIIB - NS
Area factor from Table 506.2 = 9,500 sf
Allowable area increase (separation all sides)
9,500 sf+ (9,500 x .75) = 16,625 sf
• Type IIIB -w/AFS
Area factor from Table 506.2 = 38,000 sf
1611
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |23
Allowable area increase (separation all sides)
38,000 sf+ (9,500 x .75) = 45,125 sf
Compliance Options for existing building:
• Type VB
Add Automatic Fire Sprinkler System
Allowable area w/o separations = 24,000 sf
Actual Area = 20,400 ok
Provide building separation fire walls between the remaining portion of existing building and any new additions
• 2-hr if addition is V-A
• 3-hr if addition is 11I-B
Type III-B
Add Automatic Fire Sprinkler System
Change existing exterior bearing walls to 2-hr, n-combustible. Fire treated wood framing okay " Firewalls not required if total building area per story, including a Type III-B addition, does not exceed 45,125 sf and total building area (2-stories) does not exceed 90,250 sf.

Impacts on Building Renovation and Recommendations:
• Install new automatic fire sprinkler system
• Install new fire alarm and notification system
• Remove and replace building roof system, and any deck showing signs of deterioration • New roof insulation R35
• New exterior continuous EPS insulation at exterior, batt insulation inside stud cavity, R19 total • New exterior wall sheathing
1612
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |24
Existing and Accessibility Analysis
The Access Compliance Assessment below, previously prepared by Williams + Paddon, generally identifies areas and elements of the existing facility that are not in compliance with current accessibility codes.

Alterations to the existing facility will be subject to the requirements of CBC Section 11 B-202. The requirements include full compliance for all altered elements and spaces and an accessible path of travel to the specific areas of alteration. The primary accessible path of travel shall include:

1. A primary entrance to the building or facility,

2. Toilet and bathing facility serving the area,

3. Drinking fountains serving the area,

4. Public telephones serving the area, and

5. Signage
The cost of the alteration will exceed the valuation threshold so full compliance with the requirements described above is mandatory regardless of cost unless the enforcing agency determines that the cost is an unreasonable hardship.

The following assessment was provided by Williams + Paddon in the facility assessment conducted March 2016. 1613
SLT R
ecreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |25
1614
SLT R
ecreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |26
1615
SLT R
ecreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |27
1616
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |28
SECTION 4: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Hazardous Materials Assessment
The City of South Lake Tahoe commissioned a hazardous materials test of the existing building by Environmental Testing & Consulting Inc. dated September 17, 2019. In an excerpt from this report, the methodology and purpose are summarized as follows:

On September 12 and 17, 2019, a representative from Environmental Testing & Consulting (ETC) collected samples of building materials * (roofing, wood shake black paper, composite shingles, fire-taped walls/ceiling, stucco, knock down texture wall/ceiling, thermal system insulation, 12" x 12" white speckled floor tile/mastic, 4" and 6" cove base mastic, 12" x 12" ceiling tiles, composite fire doors, HVAC tape, and sheet flooring/mastic) in the areas (occupied space and exterior - please see attached sketch for exact sample locations) of the above-mentioned facility/residence intended for removal/renovation. The contractor described the scope of work.

The purpose of this survey was to determine if Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) existed in the building materials that may be disturbed by an intended renovation. With this knowledge, the Owner or the Owner's Agent can determine what abatement action is necessary for appropriate health and safety precautions and to comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulatory requirements prior to and during the proposed renovation. The survey work included conducting a visual inspection of the proposed work areas to determine types of building materials present, then developing and implementing a sampling plan of all accessible suspect asbestos containing materials in the intended renovation area. Samples were collected from th e impacted materials. The samples were analyzed for asbestos content by EPA Method 600/R-93/116.

From the summary, the description and location of all ACM detected in the survey is summarized in the following table. The following homogenous materials were determined to be ACM because the analytical results indicate they contain greater than 0.1%** asbestos:
1617
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |29
The materials determined not to be ACM because they did not contain regulated quantities of asbestos include:
• Knock down texture wall/ceiling materials in the gym storage area (<1000 square feet) • Tar and gravel roofing (>6 square feet)
• Composite shingles (>6 square feet)
• Stucco around the pool (>6 square feet)
• Thermal system insulation (joints, elbows, etc.) in all mechanical rooms (>6 square feet) • HVAC tape/wrap in in all mechanical rooms (>6 square feet) • Stucco in the pool bathroom/locker room (>6 square feet) • Mini tank insulation in the pool mechanical room (>6 square feet) • 12" x 12" white speckled floor tile in the activity room, copy room, kitchen (>6 square feet) • 4" and 6" cove base mastic throughout (>6 square feet) • 12" x 12" ceiling tile in the bathrooms and administration offices (>6 square feet) • Fire-taped wall/ceiling materials in the mechanical room above the maintenance office (>6 square f eet) • Sheet flooring/mastic in the kitchen (>6 square feet) • Fire-taped wall/ceiling materials in the gym mechanical room (>6 square feet) Impacts on Building Renovation:
• Abate all drywall and texture containing asbestos, replace all new drywall and texture • Abate all floor tile and mastic, replace all floor tile • Abate exterior paper, remove shake shingles. Replace exterior building cladding with cementitious wood siding on new dens deck, building paper and sheathing 1618
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |30
Section 5: StructuralAssessment
Introduction
Gabbart & Woods Tahoe Partners has been retained by Perkins & Will to provide assistance regarding the feasibility of incorporating portions of the existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation Center into a future Recreation Complex. This proposed complex includes new construction adjoining remodeled existing construction. Our narrative is prepared to provide such assistance.

Limitations
This narrative is of a general nature; in-depth analysis and calculations were not undertaken within this scope of work. No lateral analysis of the existing building was undertaken.

Existing Building Areas
The existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation Center is comprised of three general areas:
• Multi-Purpose / Gym Area
• Central Area with Entries/ Lobbies / Classrooms
• Pool Area
Within the context of this narrative, it is assumed that the existing Pool Area will be demolished and replaced by a new enclosed Pool Building. Therefore, this narrative will address the feasibility of retaining and remodeling only the Multi-Purpose / Gym Area and the Central Area with Entries / Lobbies / Classrooms.

Applicable Codes / Standards
The evaluations within this narrative are based upon the following Codes and Standards:
• 2019 California Building Code, including Chapter 34A, “Existing Structures” • 2019 California Existing Building Code
• ASCE Standard, ASCE 7-17, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures” • ASCE Standard, ASCE 41-17, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings” Existing Plans and Details / Site Visit
To obtain information for the preparation of this narrative, we referred to copies of the original plans and details by Schuyler L. Jeffries AIA & Associates, dated 2.6.74. We also visited the site on 11.20.19 to observe the visible elements of the structure.

DESIGN CRITERIA
The following Design Criteria applies to the proposed Recreation Complex, in accordance with the requirements of The City of South Lake Tahoe:

Structural Risk Category III, based upon conceivable occupancy of more than 150 people in the main gathering areas.

Snow Design
Snow Load (Pg) = 150 psf
• Exposure coefficient (Ce) = 1.0
• Thermal coefficient (Ct) = 1.0
• Snow Importance Factor (Is) =1.10, for Risk Category III Seismic Design
• Mapped spectral response acceleration (Ss) = 1.538
• Seismic Design Category D
• Seismic Site Class D
• Seismic Importance Factor (Ie) = 1.25, for Risk Category III Wind Design
• Wind Speed (Vult) = 130 mph
• Wind Speed (Vasd) = 101 mph
1619
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |31
• Wind Exposure Category B
Soil Capacity = 1500 psf (Assumed default value unless a geotechnical report provides higher values) Floor Live Loads
• Multi-purpose areas = 100 psf
• Egress areas = 100 psf
• Classrooms / Offices= 50 psf
Existing Structural Systems Description
Multi-Purpose / Gym Area
The existing Multi-Purpose / Gym Area is a one-story structure consisting of central level timber roof framing, perimeter sloping mansard timber roof framing, timber ceiling framing, wood stud and plywood shear walls, a slab-on-grade floor, and concrete stem walls with shallow concrete continuous footings and spread pads.

Central Area with Entries/ Lobbies / Classrooms
The existing Central Area with Entries / Lobbies / Classrooms is a one-story structure consisting of level timber “upper” roof framing, level timber structural ceiling framing (aka “main roof” on the original plans) , perimeter sloping mansard roof framing, wood stud and plywood shear walls, concrete masonry unit (CMU) shear walls, and concrete stem walls with shallow concrete continuous footings and spread pads. A portion of the roof structure bears upon the concrete structure associated with the Pool Area which may be identified for demolition.

General Condition of the Existing Structural Systems (Observations are limited to those elements visible at the time of our site visit.)
Wood Roof Framing:

In general, the wood roof structure does not appear to show signs of structural distress. We did not observe significant structural cracks or visible signs of deflection beyond accepted norms.

Some wood members in the perimeter sloping mansard roofs, which are exposed to the outside elements show some normal, and repairable, deterioration.

The condition of the existing roof plywood diaphragms is not completely known, but those areas visible from below appear to be in good condition.

Wood Stud and Plywood Walls:

No visible signs of distress were noted in the wood stud and plywood walls. Walls appeared to be plumb and true.

CMU Walls:

No visible signs of distress were noted in the CMU walls. Walls appeared to be plumb and true. The wall reinforcing pattern is not known, nor is it known if the walls are solid grouted or partially grouted.

Concrete Floor Slabs:

According to the original plans, the slabs on grade are 4 inches thick with welded wire mesh, over 2 inches of sand over a vapor barrier over 4 inches of rock base. No visible signs of distress were noted in the slabs, nor were slabs observed to be significantly out of level.

Concrete Walls and Stem walls:

No visible signs of distress were noted in the concrete walls and stem walls.

Concrete Footings:

Concrete footings were not visible for observation however no signs of significant settlement were observed.

Load Resistance Requirements of the Existing Structural Systems as affected by Additions and Alterations Lateral Loads:
1620
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |32
This narrative assumes that seismic forces will govern over wind forces in the general design of the lateral force system and its primary elements.

Governing Code Sections
• CBC Section 3403A.4 “Where the addition is structurally independent of the existing structure, existing lateral load-carrying structural elements shall be permitted to remain unaltered.” • CBC Section 3404A.4 / Exception 1 “Any existing lateral load-carrying structural element whose demand-capacity ratio with the alteration considered is no more than 10 percent greater than its demand-capacity ratio with the alteration ignored shall be permitted to remain unaltered.” Commentary
• The existing Lateral Force System consists of plywood wood roof diaphragms, plywood shear walls, and CMU shear walls.
• It is desirable that Additions be designed to be structurally independent of the existing building. This simplifies the path to code conformance by not placing additional demand upon the existing structure to resist lateral load forces from the Additions.
• Even if the Additions are independent of the existing building, there could be additional lateral load exerted on the existing roof due to drifting snow from the Additions. It would be desirable to configure roofs and /or parapets of the Additions to prevent the deposition of drifting snow onto the existing roof. • It is reasonable to assume that the existing roof diaphragms can be adapted to meet acceptable demand-capacity ratios.
• While it is desirable that an increase in the demand-capacity ratio of existing building shear walls due to alterations be limited to 10 percent, this may not be a realistic goal. Many of the existing building’s interior wood stud walls and CMU walls were detailed as shear walls and it is likely that proposed floor plan alterations may eliminate significant sections of these shear walls. If this is the case, the building’s remaining and new shear walls would require justification with the provisions of the 2019 CBC, or alternatively, with the tiered performance analysis procedures of ASCE 41 -17. ▪ Strengthening of the wood shear walls to meet the provisions of the 2019 CBC could be undertaken by increasing nailing, adding anchor bolts and supplementing tiedown hardware. ▪ CMU shear walls in buildings designated Seismic Design Category D must conform to the requirements of Special Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls (SRMSW) in order to meet the requirements of the 2016 CBC. These requirements in the present codes aim to provide ductility in the shear walls to deter brittle failure in a design level seismic event. The existing CMU shear walls almost certainly do not meet the reinforcing detailing required of SRMSW.

A tiered performance analysis of the existing CMU shear walls in accordance with ASCE 41-17 could be undertaken in conjunction with testing (non-destructive and / or destructive) of the existing wall grout and reinforcing. It may not be realistic however to expect that the existing walls would be found to provide the required performance characteristics.

More realistically, the existing CMU shear walls could be strengthened to meet the requirements of the 2019 CBC. This could be accomplished by adding surface mats of steel reinforcing bars and a pneumatically applied concrete (“shot-crete”) layer with a minimum thickness of at least 4 inches. Some new foundations may also be required in this strengthening process.
▪ CMU shear walls also must meet current code requirements regarding “out-of- plane” seismic forces (ie perpendicular to the wall surface). Anchorage force code requirements for attachmen t of the top of the CMU wall to the roof diaphragm have increased significantly since the time of the original design and therefore strengthening of these connections may be required. This may be accomplished by installing new epoxied anchors into the grouted walls and using welded steel plates with bolts to the wood roof framing.
▪ Grid line 22, the existing interface of the Central Area with the Pool Area, is an important line in the lateral load paths. A new shear wall or new moment frame system would be required here when the existing pool structure is demolished. Temporary shoring will be required. 1621
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |33
Gravity (Snow) Loads
Governing Code Section:
• CBC Section 3403A.3 / Exception 1 “Any existing gravity load-carrying structural element for which an addition and its related alterations cause an increase in design gravity load of more than 5 percent shall be strengthened, supplemented, replaced, or otherwise altered as needed to carry the increased load required by this code for new structures.

Commentary
• Per the 2019 CBC, a Snow Importance factor of 1.10 is required if there is an assignment of structural Risk Category III to the building. The basic flat roof design snow load would therefore be Pr= (0.7) (1.0) (1.0) (1.1) 150=116 psf.
• Drifting Snow: In the proposed new Recreation Complex, it is possible that Additions will create conditions which could deposit drifting snow on the existing roof structures. Therefore, consideration should be given to additional drift snow loads in accordance with ASCE 7 -10, Section 7.7. As mentioned in the “lateral forces” section above, it would be desirable to configure roofs and /or parapets of the Additions to prevent the deposition of drifting snow onto the existing roof. Actual roof geometries will determine the design magnitude of the resulting drift snow loads. If it is thought that significant drifting will occur, we suggest that a drift surcharge load Pd of 70 psf, applied in a manner suggested in ASCE 7- 10 figure 7-8, be used.
• Design criteria for the existing building was not available for our review, but from our review of the original plans, as well as our spot check calculations for key roof members, we believe it is likely that the original design snow load was at least equivalent to the current basic 116 psf requirement, but perhaps less than that now required in areas which will experience drifting snow load. • Wood rafters and wood beams may be strengthened to meet the 2016 CBC design requirements in areas of drifting snow. For rafters, this may be accomplished by the addition of “sistered” like-sized members alongside the existing members. For beams this may be accomplished by the addition of new posts with footings to shorten the beam spans or by the addition of bolted steel plates alongside portions of the existing wood beams.
• We believe the vast majority of existing posts and footings will most likely be found to meet the requirements of the 2019 CBC.
• Grid line 22, the existing interface of the Central Area with the Pool Area, is an important line in the roof loads. A new bearing wall or new post and beam system would be required here when the existing pool structure is demolished. Temporary shoring will be required.

Summary
In summary, the existing building’s structural systems appear to be in good serviceable condition. The CMU shear walls are likely not designed to today’s ductility or diaphragm anchorage requirements, but other structural elements observed and reviewed on the plans are likely to be reasonably close to meeting today’s codes and standards of care.

Desirable characteristics of any Additions and Alterations, from a structural standpoint, might include:
• Design and detail the proposed Additions as independent structures with seismic joints at the interface with the existing building.
• Design the Additions’ roof geometry to not deposit significant drift snow load upon the existing roofs. • Leave intact, to a reasonable extent, the many existing wood stud and plywood shear walls. • Do not disturb the existing CMU shear walls.

Other recommendations for the future engineering design phase include:
• Undertake exploratory investigation (possibly including limited focused demolition) and testing of a representative sample of the existing CMU walls prior to design. 1622
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |34
• Check the capacity of the existing anchorage details at the top of the CMU shear walls and consider strengthening these connections.
• In specific areas where shear walls are to be reduced in length or removed altogether, remaining shear walls may be strengthened, and / or new walls strategically added. Wood shear walls may be strengthened more easily and cost effectively than CMU shear walls. • Grid line 22, the interface of the existing Central Area and Pool Area, would require shoring during demolition of the existing pool structure. A new structural wall or new moment frame should be incorporated at this line to support lateral loads and snow loads from the existing structure. • Some exposed wood roof framing tails at the mansard roofs show normal signs of wear from exposure to moisture, and these members could benefit from added protection.

Finally, in any cost analysis it would be wise to provide an allowance for unforeseen conditions and potential structural issues currently not visible or known.
1623
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |35
SECTION 6:MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING

ASSESSMENT
Summary
Sugarpine Engineering (SPE) was asked to review the existing envelope, mechanical, electrical, and plumbin g (MEP) systems in the facility indicated above. Envelope was reviewed for energy and thermal performance only.

The purpose of our field observation and subsequent research was to determine, to a reasonable degree of engineering certainty, whether the existing MEP systems have significant remaining useful life, and to what extent, if any, they can be kept or re-used for a remodel or expansion of this facility.

Our work considered whether systems are configured appropriately relative to current building codes, ordinances, published standards, and regional construction precedence. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of those findings.

Note that this report is based on engineering judgment, visual observation, review of the works of others , and engineering experience. Items were evaluated to reasonable accuracy based on available information, and one visual review of the facility. Should new information become available, we reserve the right to evaluate this information and any impact it that it may have on our findings. This is a summary report and is not an exhaustive report. No destructive testing or destructive investigation was performed.

Executive Summary
The facility appears to have been well-built when it was constructed. Most current MEP systems are built to last 20-25 years. 45 years is approaching the end of even the best-case lifespan of all parts of MEP systems, except generally ductwork and dry sheet metal. We recommend that some newer components be kept, but most of the systems in the facility should be replaced.

Observations

1. General:
a. The MEP systems were constructed in 1974, with final facility completion in 1975. b. Most of the systems are in the original configuration with original products, and generally match the design plans.
c. Facility is operational in its present condition.
d. Piping is likely nearing the end of its useful life. e. Evidence of severe ice damming and roof leaks.
f. Severe corrosion on all parts of the pool wing.
g. Windows and main doors are metallic storefront and steel framed systems. Double-pane clear glazing.
h. Service doors are hollow wood or steel.

2. Envelope:
a. No insulation on CMU block or concrete walls.
b. 2x6 walls with fiberglass batt (per original plans, not visible). c. Roof batt insulation thickness not visible, not clearly indicated on original plans. d. Evidence of severe and prolonged roof leaks; calcium stalactites and stalagmites. e. Evidence of severe and prolonged interior condensation and associated corrosion damage.

3. Pool:
a. Filters are sand type, manufactured in 2012.
b. Filter pump was manufactured in 2015. 15hp motor.
c. Boiler (pool heater) with its associated pump was manufactured in 2019. 1,260 MBH input, 1,071 MBH output nameplate rating.
d. Original heat exchanger (used to be fed by the main boilers) has been removed. e. Room humidity is high.
1624
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |36
f. Evidence of condensation and corrosion.
g. Pool water treatment is done by adding oxidizers. No UV system exists. h. Chemical storage room MEP systems are extremely corroded.

4. Fire Protection:
a. No sprinkler system exists.
b. No alarm system exists.

5. Plumbing:
a. Metallic piping and plumbing fixtures in and near the pool area are severely corroded. b. Fixtures are mostly original, commercial and heavy-duty grade. c. Showerheads appear to be lower-flow than original.
d. Fiberglass packaged showers were added to the Women’s locker room somewhat recently. e. Main shower valves are original. At least one is leaking at the handle. f. Two domestic water heaters were new around 2006. Original boiler-heated tanks were replaced with gas-fired units at that time. Pumps appear to have been replaced around the same time. g. Piping and insulation appear to be original and in good condition. Note that pipe wall thickness was not evaluated, but neither our visual review nor staff report indicated any leaking pipes.

6. HVAC:
a. Large boiler was manufactured in 1974. 5,000 MBH input, 4,000 MBH output nameplate rating. b. Small boiler was manufactured in 2010 and replaced the second large boiler. 2,000 MBH input, 1,700 MBH output nameplate rating.
c. Numerous repairs have been made to almost all hot-water heating components; air handlers, valves, pumps, tanks, etc.
d. Most pumps have been repaired and/or replaced, assumed to be part of the 2010 mechanical repair/upgrade projects.
e. Expansion tank is atmospheric-type and appears to be original. f. Ductwork appears to be original.
g. Cogeneration gas turbine (heat + electricity) was manufactured in 2010. Is not in operation. Staff reports that it was possibly damaged during installation, doesn’t work, and has been off for years. h. Cogeneration heat exchanger was manufactured and installed same as turbine. System is piped but not used.
i. Piping and insulation appear to be original and in good condition. j. Air handling units and fans have leaks at their coil piping. k. Air handling units are original. Main exhaust fan wheel is unbalanced, or shaft is bent, causing the attic to shake.
l. Attic is being used as a return-air plenum.

7. Electrical
a. Generator is Cummins/Onan manufactured in 1991. 300 kW / 375 kVA, 120/208V, 3-phase. Remote outdoor radiator. Appears to be in good condition.
b. Automatic transfer switch is Cummins/Onan manufactured in 1991. 1000A, 120/208V, 3-phase.

NEMA 3R rated for outdoor installation. Appears to be in good condition. c. Main distribution switchboard is Westinghouse manufactured in 1974. 1000A, 120/208V, 3-phase.

This is the original switchboard. Shows signs of rust/oxidation and corrosion. Missing hardware and labeling. Housing not fully enclosed.
d. Distribution panelboards are Westinghouse. Appear to be original. Show sign s of rust/oxidation and corrosion. Circuit labeling unreliable.
e. Receptacles are a variety with most having been replaced at some point since the original construction. Many areas lack GFCI protections. Some outdoor receptacles lack adequate weatherproof coverings. Some areas lack sufficient receptacles, promoting the use of power strips and extension cords.
f. Switched receptacles would be required in office and lobby areas to meet current CA energy code.

8. Lighting
a. Fixtures are mostly a variety of incandescent, fluorescent, and compact fluorescent fixtures with a few newer LED fixtures.
b. Most lighting fixtures are functioning with some fixtures in disrepair. c. There are a variety of color temperatures lamps installed, resulting in some fixtures appearing yellow and others appearing blue in hue.
1625
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |37
d. Most of the lighting fixtures will not comply with current CA energy codes because they are not dimmable or do not meet the required efficacy.
e. Light switching also generally does not comply with current CA energy codes. f. Parking lot lighting was observed during the daytime and was not reviewed for adequacy to remain.

Findings and Potential Issues

1. General:
a. Pipes generally wear out through corrosion and erosion in 30-50 years, depending on water quality. Copper can last longer if water quality is tightly controlled. b. Piping specialties (valves, fittings, flanges, gauges, etc.) have been replaced over time, and can be periodically replaced and repaired indefinitely if parts are available. c. Systems are generally in good condition, considering their age. Most HVAC and plumbing systems in facilities of this type are designed to last 20-30 years.

2. Envelope:
a. Wall insulation does not meet current energy code.
b. Insulation within walls may be damaged from long term exposure to severe condensation and roof leaks.
c. Roof insulation does not meet current energy code. Roof is not thick enough to be insulated per code.
d. Windows, skylights, and doors do not meet current energy code. e. Some windows, skylights, and doors are damaged/corroded beyond repair.

3. Pool:
a. CPVC piping has remaining useful life, as CPVC is generally nonreactive to pool water. Note however that with low material cost, re-using salvaged CPVC is generally not recommended.

Fittings with glue joints must be cut-out and cannot be reused. b. Sand filters and their controls have significant remaining useful life. c. Boiler, controls and flue have significant remaining useful life. d. Plumbing fixtures in the pool area have exceeded their useful life. e. Surge tank visually appears to be stable, but this is not verifiable. Configuration and access from the pool deck is a safety concern.
f. Plumbing fixture access and deck drainage does not comply with current plumbing or pool health codes.
g. Deck drain system has been repaired and deck patched in several locations. Drains have exceeded their useful life. Cannot locate an air gap as required by current code.

4. Fire Protection:
a. No system exists. NFPA 13 sprinkler and alarm systems are required by current codes.

5. Plumbing:
a. Shower valves need leak repair.
b. Plumbing fixtures can have a useful life of more than 50 years if properly maintained and parts remain available. However, current code requires lower flowrates, so these fixtures cannot be re-installed.
c. Fixtures and piping (brass devices, solder) likely contain lead. d. Parking lot storm drains are simple area wells and do not adequately drain, causing flooding of the facility.

6. HVAC:
a. Leaks at many pumps, valves and coils.
b. Corrosion exists on most components.
c. Ducts generally do not wear out unless exposed to corrosives. d. Pool area is extremely humid and condensation corrosion has destroyed windows, doors, trim, and other metal components. Surfaces are wet to the touch. Windows are dripping, with water staining on the floor from continuous wetting.
e. Corrosion is accelerated by chemical treatment.
f. Chemical room MEP systems are extremely corroded, and corroded electrical systems pose a safety hazard because grounding may be compromised.
g. Attic materials are not suitable for use as a return air plenum. 1626
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |38
h. Fire and smoke dampers are not in current code-required locations and configurations. i. Heating water is constant-flow; does not comply with current energy code. j. Controls, alarms and safeties were not verified, but likely are not in compliance with current codes.

7. Electrical:
a. Generator and ATS may have significant useful life and can be re-used if the future design permits and if the generator meets the current emission requirements. Does not appear to have experienced significant usage.
b. Corroded and obsolete equipment and devices should be replaced out of safety and fire concerns.
c. Electrical Service is inadequate to provide power for EV Charging, required by current codes.

8. Lighting:
a. Fixtures are energy consuming and do not comply with current energy codes. b. Fixtures are not dimmable, so they can’t be used with code-required dimming and daylight controls.
c. Circuiting is not configured such that controls can be easily added. d. A substantial remodel will require that all lighting be brought up to current codes. e. Egress and Exit lighting does not meet current code.

Recommendations and Code Requirements

1. Pool:
a. Demolish entire pool area; no salvageable MEP infrastructure. b. Keep or re-use heating boiler, controls, flue.
c. Keep or re-use sand filters, controls.
d. Keep or re-use main circulation pump.
e. Replace entire deck drainage system.
f. Replace all plumbing fixtures.
g. Replace make-up water system.
h. Add UV disinfection system.
i. Upgrade chemical controls.
j. Replace all MEP systems in chemical and pool equipment rooms.

2. Envelope:
a. Replace all windows, skylights, and doors with code-compliant units. b. Apply new vapor barriers on interior surfaces of all walls and roofs. c. Apply new vapor permeable membranes on outside of walls and roofs. d. Apply sandwich panel or similar foam insulation on outside of all CMU and concrete walls. e. Remove all wall interior surfaces and exterior siding, then spray-foam solid all wall cavities. f. Increase roof thickness approx. 6”, and spray-foam solid all roof cavities.

3. Fire Protection:
a. Add fire sprinkler system to the facility.
b. Add fire alarm system to the facility.
c. Add new 8” fire water service to the facility.

4. Plumbing:
a. All new systems are recommended.
b. Replace all plumbing fixtures.
c. Replace all piping, valves and fittings.
d. Replace all water heaters. May use indirect heating in conjunction with boiler system replacement.
e. Replace all pumps.
f. Change parking lot drainage; route to storm drains.
g. Other changes or replacements as may be necessary due to architectural changes.

5. HVAC:
a. All new systems are recommended.
b. Replace large boiler. Large boiler has exceeded its useful life. c. Small boiler may have useful life remaining. Typical lifespan is 20 years, so 10 remaining. d. Remove dysfunctional cogeneration unit.
1627
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |39
e. Replace corroded unit heaters in chemical and pool equipment rooms. Other units may have useful life remaining.
f. Balance fans, clean and refurbish air handling units in place. Unit structure and configuration is still in good condition.
g. Add fire ratings and suitable treatments to attics used as return air plenums. h. Replace all valves and actuators.
i. Replace all piping in the building.
j. Replace entire boiler plant system with variable flow pumping and suitable devices. k. Replace all control valves; re-pipe all coils and devices for variable flow. l. Replace all controls with a unified digital control system. Although pneumatic controls have some remaining useful life, digital controls are generally more capable, expandable, less expensive to repair, and contractors are more familiar with service and maintenance. m. Re-seal all ductwork.
n. May keep air handling units, but replace all coils, controls, and fan motors. o. Replace all VFDs and electrical infrastructure.
p. Other changes or replacements as may be necessary due to architectural changes.

6. Electrical:
a. Keep or re-use generator, if design permits.
b. Keep or re-use ATS, if design permits.
c. Replace all circuits, conductors, and conduits.
d. Replace all panels and subpanels.
e. Replace all disconnects and motor starters.
f. Replace all receptacles.
g. Add demand-responsive devices.
h. Upgrade electrical service and service entrance equipment (switchboard). i. Add Electric Vehicle chargers.
j. Other changes or replacements as may be necessary due to architectural changes.

7. Lighting:
a. Replace all lighting fixtures with dimmable high-CRI LED fixtures. b. Replace all lighting controls.
c. Add daylighting controls, dimmers, timeclocks, occupancy sensors, and other code-required devices.
d. Change all lighting circuits.
e. Review exterior site lighting for adequacy.
f. Other changes or replacements as may be necessary due to architectural changes. g. Replace all egress and exit lighting; add fixtures as necessary. 1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634

REQUEST FOR INTEREST (RFI)
Interested Parties for

USE OF THE FORMER RECREATION CENTER
Statement of Interests will be received until 3:00pm on June 29, 2026, in the City Manager’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way.

South Lake Tahoe, California 96150
1635

SUMMARY
The City of South Lake Tahoe is requesting information from parties that are interested in using the former Recreation Center, located at 1180 Rufas Allen Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. Intended use must meet the current permitted requirements which is for public access – recreational related activities. The former Recreation Center is in need of repairs and upgrades, and interested parties will need to consider the related costs as part of occupying the facility.

RFI’s from Interested parties are due on or before June 29, 2026 no later than 3:00 p.m. (Pacific Standard Time). Information from interested parties received after the deadline will not be accepted. Information from interested parties must be submitted via U.S. mail, in person (hand delivered), or by Planet Bids on-line portal. Fax and e-mail submission will not be accepted.

Attn: Brian Dossey, City Manager’s Office
[email protected]
Interested Parties for - USE OF THE FORMER RECREATION CENTER 1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Read this RFI document carefully as the most “responsible and responsive” party responding to this RFI will be invited to a meeting with City Staff for further discussion. The City of South Lake Tahoe reserves the right to accept or reject any or all requests for information or to extend the period for accepting proposals, to advertise the RFI at any time and to waive any minor irregularities in any proposals.

There will be a pre-RFI walkthrough of the former Recreation Center at 1180 Rufus Allen Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 on June 15, 2026 at 11:00am. All interested parties are encouraged to attend the walkthrough.

In the opinion of the City of South Lake Tahoe, this RFI is complete and without need of explanation. However, if you have questions, or should you need any clarifying information, please use the Q&A feature that is found within Planet Bids, where the RFI is posted or send your questions via e-mail at [email protected]. The deadline for submitting questions will be June 18, 2026. Responses to RFI questions will be released on June 23, 2026 via Planet Bids and via email.

Please note that no information given will be binding upon the City unless such information is issued in writing as an official addendum to this RFI.
1636

TIMELINE OF CRITICAL DATES
Release of RFI May 26, 2026
Pre RFI walkthrough at the former
Recreation Center
June 15, 2026
Deadline for Question Submittal via e-mail or
Planet Bids
June 18, 2026
Response to RFI Questions will be released June 23, 2026 RFI submittals DUE June 29, 2026
Review Period/Meetings June 30 – July 21, 2026
1637

SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

1. Submittal Process
Interested parties may submit their Request of Interest (RFI) in one of two ways; a. Mail or Hand Deliver RFI to:

Attn: Brian Dossey, City Manager’s Office
Interested Parties for - USE OF THE FORMER RECREATION CENTER 1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
b. Register with the City
Interested parties submitting an RFI through Planet Bids must complete a “Vendor Registration Form” to be entered in the City of South Lake Tahoe Vendor Database. Vendor registration is required to submit an RFI through Planet Bids. Parties will be notified by the City of any addenda that may be issued to this Request for Information (RFI). Entities must register in the City’s Vendor Database to be notified of such addenda.

To register, go to: https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/14997/portal-home and follow the instructions applicable to Proposer. Following submission, Proposer will receive a confirmation message within 24 hours from the City. Proposers will then be prompted to complete the “Vendor Registration Form”. Proposers are solely responsible for maintaining up to date and accurate information in the Vendor Database.

2. Number of Copies
One (1) RFI must be submitted via US Mail, Hand Delivered or through the Planetbid portal.

RFI’s shall not be faxed or e-mailed to the City. RFI’s not received by the date and time specified in this RFI, will be rejected. Documents submitted in response to this RFI will become the property of the City of South Lake Tahoe and will be regarded as public record under California Public Records Act under Government Code 6250 et seq., and subject to review or release to the public (excluding financial records marked “confidential”), which shall be available via – email or for the entity to pick up following a review and selection of the firm(s).

3. Format
Font, Type and Style: All RFI’s shall be single sided and professionally prepared (no handwritten RFI’s will be accepted). There are no requirements regarding font size, type or style requirements.

4. Submittal Deadline
Response to this RFI is due on or before June 29, 2026 no later than 3:00 p.m. (Pacific Standard Time) at City offices (address below). Reponses received after the deadline will not be accepted; there are no exceptions. Fax and Electronic-mailed (e-mail) submission will/will not be accepted. 1638
Submit Proposals to:

Attn: Brian Dossey, City Manager’s Office
Interested Parties for - USE OF THE FORMER RECREATION CENTER 1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150

5. Selection Process
City Staff will evaluate the submitted RFI’s and party(s) will be objectively evaluated based on their responses to this RFI. The written RFI should clearly demonstrate how the entity could best satisfy the requirements of the City.

City Staff intends to invite parties who have completed the RFI in full to a meeting to discuss next steps.

The City of South Lake Tahoe reserves the right to accept or reject any or all RFI’s or to extend the period for accepting proposals, to advertise the RFI at any time and to waive any minor irregularities in any proposal.
1639

INTRODUCTION

6. Background
The City of South Lake Tahoe is located along the south shore of Lake Tahoe in El Dorado County, California and consists of approximately 16.5 square miles of land and lake shoreline within the Lake Tahoe Basin. The City is located in a mountainous environment with a touristbased economy. The City’s population is currently approximately 23,000 full time residents, with as many as 200,000 people visiting during the busiest summer weekends.

At the March 24, 2026, City Council meeting, Council directed staff to seek potential parties that would be interested in using the former Recreation Center, 1180 Rufas Allen Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 for public use - recreational related activities. The 34,000 square foot recreation center has a swimming pool, locker rooms, gymnasium, multi-purpose rooms, meeting space, kitchen, and offices.

The interested party will be required to meet the monthly maintenance costs to keep the facility running (estimated at $606,900 annually, could be more depending on the type of use, frequency of use, and aging infrastructure. Costs could be less without pool use). See Exhibit A for a breakdown of estimated monthly/annual maintenance costs.

The interested party will probably have to invest in significant facility upgrades to HVAC, electrical, plumbing, new roof, structural repairs, etc., and possible lead and asbestos abatement depending on desired length of use and tenant improvements. Please see Exhibit B for details on improvements recommended (possibly required) and their estimated costs.

There could also be additional costs related to permitting; i.e. Building Permits - Tenant Improvements, and TRPA. The TRPA permit may require additional mobility mitigation fees as well as coverage mitigation fees.

The former Recreation Center is located on what is known as the 56-acre parcel which is owned by El Dorado County. The City of South Lake Tahoe owns the former Recreation Center and has a ground lease agreement with El Dorado County. The lease agreement states that the City of South Lake Tahoe must demolish the former Recreation Center from the site and return the site to uncovered land by 2037. Any intended use beyond 2037 would require a new lease agreement with El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe.

Please see Exhibit C (Agenda Item#14 – March 24, 2026, City Council Meeting) to the Request for Information document detailing City Council/Staff discussions regarding the former Recreation Center, the 56 Acre and Ground Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County, the 2022 - 56 Acres Master Plan, and the 2020 Existing Conditions Report and 2022 TRPA Permit.

7. Objective
The City of South Lake Tahoe seeks to identify interested parties that would like to use the former Recreation Center, 1180 Rufas Allend Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 for public use – 1640
recreational related activities. Interested party must be able to meet the maintenance and capital improvement costs.
1641

REQUEST FOR INTEREST CONTENT

REQUIREMENTS

8. Request for Interest Requirements - All requests must include the following information and shall be organized as described below.

A. Cover Letter
The cover letter shall be addressed to Brian Dossey, City Manager’s Office, and at a minimum, must contain the following:
• Identification of party, including name, address and telephone number • Name, title, address and telephone number of contact person • Signed by person authorized to represent and negotiate for the party.

B. Executive Summary
The intent of this narrative is to inform the City of South Lake Tahoe of the party purpose and mission and how its programs and activities benefit the general public.

C. Entity/Organization History, Background and Experience Describe the entity history and organizational structure, including the size of the party, location of office(s) and years in business and services and programs provided.

D. Intended Use
Describe the parties intended use of the former Recreations Center. Please provide proposed programs and activities, target audience, hours of operation, proposed costs to general public (if any), and provide a proposed time-line for building repairs and upgrades, facility occupation, and program/activity launch.

E. Budget
Provide documentation that demonstrates the party’s ability to pay for and commitment to the maintenance costs and building improvement costs.

F. Insurance
Provide documentation of the party’s ability to provide all appropriate insurance including but not limited to property, liability, worker’s compensation, etc. 1642

EVALUATION METHOD & NEXT STEPS
Requests for Interest will first be reviewed for responsiveness to the requirements. If any information is missing from the required content, the request for information may be deemed nonresponsive and returned to proposer.

City of South Lake Tahoe staff will review the Requests for Interest and party’s who complete the Request for Interest in full will be invited to a meeting with City Staff to discuss next steps. 1643
Exhibit A - Estimated Operating Costs
Former Recreation Center Estimated Operating Costs
Catageory Average Monthly Cost Average Annual Costs
Utilities
Electricity 11,833.33 $ 142,000.00 $ 5 year average
Gas 6,975.00 $ 83,700.00 $ 5 year average
Water 2,016.67 $ 24,200.00 $ 5 year average
Communications 483.33 $ 5,800.00 $ 5 year average
Contactual Services
Snow Removal 2,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 6 months per year
Pest Control 1,500.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 5 year average
Plumbing Repairs/Parts 3,333.33 $ 40,000.00 $ 5 year average Electrical Repairs/Parts 3,333.33 $ 40,000.00 $ 5 year average Mechanical Repairs/Parts 5,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 5 year average In House Staff Costs
Custodial 10,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $
Landscape 1,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $
Parking Lot/Striping 10,000.00 $
Supplies
Pool Supplies 2,500.00 $ 30,000.00 $ FY2025 costs
General Supplies 475.00 $ 5,700.00 $ 5 year average
Tools, Parts, Etc. 208.33 $ 2,500.00 $ 5 year average
Machinery/Equipment 83.33 $ 1,000.00 $ 5 year average
TOTAL COSTS $ 606,900.00 50,741.67 $
1644
Exhibit B - Estimated Tenant Improvement- Capital Project Costs Recommended Work Estimated Costs
Window & Exterior Doors & Siding 3,400,000.00 $
Interior Paint 500,000.00 $
Interior Finish 700,000.00 $
Ball Court Flooring 200,000.00 $
Building Automation Systems 300,000.00 $
Total Recommended Work 5,100,000.00 $
Recommended or Required Work Estimated Costs
Design & Professional Services Analysis $ 150,000.00
ϪϏώFÍƏÍŘîĺŪŜώaÍťôŘĖÍīŜώŪŘŽôƅώϯώťŪîƅ
ϪϏώťŘŪèťŪŘÍīώϯώôĖŜıĖèώ(ŽÍīŪÍťĖĺĲ
ϪϏώa(ώ[ĺÍîώťŪîƅϠώϼaôèēÍĲĖèÍīώϯώ(īôèťŘĖèÍīώϯώīŪıæĖĲČϽώťŪîƅ ϪϏώĺĺċώŜŜôŜŜıôĲť
Hazard Remediation / Code Compliance & Seismic Work $ 2,000,000.00 ϪϏώFÍƏÍŘîĺŪŜώaÍťôŘĖÍīŜώæÍťôıôĲť
ϪϏώťŘŪèťŪŘÍīώЭώôĖŜıĖèώôŕÍĖŘŜώĺĲώĖĲťôŘĖĺŘώ
aώ®ÍīīŜ
Roof + Structural Analysis / Repair $ 3,500,000.00
Ϫώbôſώĺĺċ
ϪώŘŪŜŜώŘôťŘĺċĖťώϯώŘôŕīÍèôıôĲť
Mechanical Systems $ 1,750,000.00
ϪϏώaôèēÍĲĖèÍīώϯώ(īôèťŘĖèÍīώϯώīŪıæĖĲČ
ϪϏώôŕīÍèôώèŘŪèĖÍīώŜƅŜťôıŜ
ADA Requirement Upgrades $ 1,200,000.00
ϪϏώēĖŜώſĖīīώĲôôîώťĺώæôώæŘĺŪČēťώŪŕώťĺώèŪŘŘôĲťώèĺîôŜώÍĲîώŜťÍĲîÍŘîŜώÍŜώ ŕÍŘťώĺċώťēôώôĲťĖŘôώèĺĲŜťŘŪèťĖĺĲώŕŘĺèôŜŜ
ϪϏώÍŘħĖĲČώīĺťϠώ"ώÍèèôŜŜϠώôťèϟώſĖīīώĲôôîώťĺώæôώŪŕîÍťôîϟ Parking lot rehabilitation & BMP Certificate $ 1,500,000.00 Fire Suppression System & Alarm $ 600,000.00
ϪϏώ
ŪŘŘôĲťώæŪĖīîĖĲČώîĺôŜώĲĺťώēÍŽôώÍώċĖŘôώŜŪŕŕŘôŜŜĖĺĲώŜƅŜťôıώÍĲîώſĖīīώ ĲôôîώťĺώæôώæŘĺŪČēťώŪŕώťĺώèŪŘŘôĲťώèĺîôŜώÍĲîώŜťÍĲîÍŘîŜϟ
Total Recommended or Required Work 10,700,000.00 $
Total of All Recommended or Required Work 15,800,000.00 $ 1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: September 8,
2026
Agenda Item #:18
Agenda Item: Discussion and Direction on General Plan 2027 - 2035 Housing Element Update Executive Summary: Since 1969, California has required that all local governments adequately plan to meet the housing needs of the community. California's local governments meet this requirement by adopting Housing Elements as part of their General Plan. Local governments are also required to submit draft and adopted housing elements to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for state law compliance review. Should the city satisfy these requirements, the state will "certify" that the element is legally adequate. The City has contracted with Placeworks to develop the City of South Lake Tahoe 2027 - 2035 Housing Element. At the August 20th Planning Commission meeting the draft 2027-2035 Housing Element was presented for the commissioners and the public to review and provide comment. The 30-day public comment period began on August 13th and will end September 12th, 2026.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: 1) Receive report and provide comments on the draft 2027- 2035 Housing Element; and, 2) Pass a Motion directing staff to submit the draft 2027-2035 Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for review.

Responsible Staff Member: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Housing Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Zachary Thomas, Director of Development Services Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Sergio Rudin, Interim City Attorney Attachments:
02_-_CSLT_7th-Cycle-RHNA.pdf
03 - SLT_Housing Element_Public Review Draft_August 2026.pdf CSLT-02.0_CC_Present Draft_9.8.26.pptx
01-Staff_Report_HousingElement_Draft__.docx
1659
City Council Report September 8, 2026 1 of 6
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: September 8, 2026
Title: Discussion and Direction on General Plan 2027 – 2035 Housing Element Update
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Housing Manager Background: Since 1969, California has required that all local governments (cities and counties) adequately plan to meet the housing needs of the community. California’s local governments meet this requirement by adopting Housing Elements as part of their General Plan (also required by the state). General Plans serve the local government’s “blueprint” for how the city and/or county will grow and develop and include seven required elements: land use, transportation, conservation, noise, open space, safety, and housing.

State housing element law (Government Code Section 65580) mandates that local governments must adequately plan to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community. Although the housing element must follow all the requirements of the general plan, the housing element has several state-mandated requirements that distinguish it from other general plan elements. Whereas the state allows local governments the ability to decide when to update their general plan, state law sets the schedule for periodic update (four- or eight-year time frame) and is synchronized with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) cycle of the relevant Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) serves as the MPO and adopted the Regional Transportation Plan in July 2025, so the City has 18 months after this date to update the Housing Element and will move to an eight-year planning cycle. The current Housing Element has a five-year planning period from June 30, 2022 through June 30, 2027, known as the 6th cycle Housing Element Planning Cycle.

Local governments are also required to submit draft and adopted housing elements to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for state law compliance review. This review ensures that the housing element meets the various state mandates that are new to the 7th Cycle Housing Element process. Some of these new requirements include: explicitly include housing allocations for acutely low0income and extremely low-income households; factor in data regarding individuals and families experiencing homelessness, cost-burdened households, and overcrowding prior to finalizing regional housing needs; and per new statutory updates like AB 2023, cities must complete required rezoning within one year of the housing element adoption 1660
City Council Report September 8, 2026 2 of 6
deadline, or up to 3 years and 90 days if they meet strict timely-submission criteria with HCD. Should the city satisfy these requirements, the state will “certify” that the element is legally adequate. Failing to comply with state law could result in serious consequences such as reduced access to infrastructure, transportation, and housing funding and vulnerability to lawsuits.

On August 7, 2025, the California Department of Housing and Community Development provided a letter to notify the City of their 7th Cycle Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) and Housing Element Update which includes the date for adoption of January 31, 2027 (Attachment 2). On November 4, 2025, the City Council passed a motion approving the Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks for the 2027 – 2035 Housing Element Update. Placeworks has been working with City staff to acquire all information related to the site analysis to meet the Regional Housing Needs Allocation for the 7th cycle Housing Element, the status of housing element programs and policies from the 2022-2027 Housing Element, analysis of fair housing, including infrastructure projects that were recently completed and/or planned in the near future. The City also maintains the Prohousing Designation since designated in March 2024.

A Housing Element is required to have the following components:
 Review of the previous housing element
 An assessment of the community’s housing needs
 Inventory and analysis of adequate sites to meet the RHNA, in the form prescribed by HCD
 Analysis of potential constraints to housing development  A fair housing assessment
 Policies and programs to address the City’s housing needs Community Engagement
There have been a series of community engagement workshops that Placeworks and/or city staff have conducted to receive challenges and opportunities to address in the City of South Lake Tahoe 2027 – 2035 Housing Element Update. City staff provided a list of targeted stakeholder consultations that Placeworks and City staff interviewed that include: Vista Rise Collective, South Lake Tahoe Family Resource Center, Tahoe Coalition for the Homeless, Tahoe Youth and Family Services, Alta California Regional Center, Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, Lake Tahoe Unified School District, El Dorado County Health and Human Services, South Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, and city staff that receive calls through the Housing Issues Hotline.

In addition, staff has provided the following larger public engagement opportunities:
 March 25, 2026: Housing Element Community Meeting at the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Center
 April 9, 2026: Tahoe Chamber’s Leadership Lake Tahoe Presentation at Lake Tahoe Community College
1661
City Council Report September 8, 2026 3 of 6
 April 13, 2026: Lake Tahoe Collaborative Presentation at South Lake Tahoe Library
 April 16, 2026: Planning Commission Public Hearing Presentation in City Council Chambers
 April 22, 2026: Cafecitos Presentation at South Lake Tahoe Family Resource Center
 June 9, 2026: Business Community Workshop at South Lake Tahoe Recreation Center
These meetings, in addition to the targeted stakeholder meetings, represent a wide variety of groups and interests throughout South Lake Tahoe. Some of the key outreach findings include: an affordable rental shortage, especially for family sized units; middleincome residents are underserved which means local businesses including Barton Health and LTUSD are having a hard time retaining staff; there are various barriers for vulnerable populations; language and digital barriers are present for housing applications and leasing; tenants have a fear of retaliation for reporting substandard conditions; there is no family emergency shelter and limited Transitional Age Youth units; and some of the regulatory and market limits such as TRPA rules, land costs, and Vacation Home Rental uncertainty constrain housing.

The Draft Housing Element was released for public comment on August 13th and will be available for 30 days with the last date on September 12th, 2026. Staff has ten days to incorporate and/or respond to all public comments, and the public comments will remain part of the Final 2027–2035 Housing Element. HCD will then have up to 90 days to review the Draft Housing Element to determine whether the draft element is substantially compliant and consider HCD’s findings before adopting the draft element.

If HCD finds the draft is not substantially compliant, the city must revise the draft to address findings by HCD or adopt without changes and include written findings explaining why the jurisdiction believes that the draft substantially complies. If the city revises the draft to address findings by HCD, then a revised draft will be publicly noticed and re-posted for seven calendar days prior to resubmission to HCD for a subsequent review, which has a a 60-day review period.

Once staff receive a letter from HCD finding the draft meets statutory requirements, staff will take the draft housing element for adoption to the Planning Commission, followed by adoption from the City Council. Staff will then submit the adopted element to HCD. The city will be found “in compliance” as of the date of HCD’s letter finding the adopted element in substantial compliance. The statutory deadline for the City to update and adopt its housing element is January 31, 2027.

Issue and Discussion: The Housing Element is developed into several parts to provide background information in addition to addressing challenges and opportunities in the City. The Housing Element contains the following sections: Introduction, Outreach, Housing Needs Assessment, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, Sites Inventory, Constraints to Building Housing, Evaluation of Previous Programs, and 1662
City Council Report September 8, 2026 4 of 6
Policies and Programs. Below are some of the findings found throughout the background report:
 South Lake Tahoe had a total of 33.6% of its housing in multifamily developments in 2025, compared to the county, which had only 12.1% of its housing in this type.
 About 41.2% of renter households earn less than $50,000 annually.  As shown in the housing cost burden data, approximately 50.2 percent of renter households and 31.8 percent of owner households are overpaying for housing, reflecting that even with income growth, housing costs have outpaced household earnings.
 Trends over the last decade indicate growing income gaps between the area surrounding Ski Run Boulevard and other South Lake Tahoe neighborhoods, which may have additional impacts on overpayment, overcrowding, and other fair housing issues.
 With over 79% of the City’s housing units built before 1980, the age of the City’s housing stock is a contributing factor to substandard conditions and adherence to new housing and/or other updates to state laws.
 Discrepancies between State Law and TRPA laws sometimes impede the City’s ability to comply with evolving State law.

City staff recognizes that the RHNA is calculated by the State and does not necessarily reflect the housing needs identified by the community. For this reason, the City’s site inventory includes an analysis of capacity for far more units in the low- and moderateincome categories than the RHNA numbers, to address the concern that the majority of the RHNA units are in the above moderate-income category (market rate). Results of the analysis show that the City currently has sufficient vacant land appropriately zoned to meet all RHNA income categories and no rezoning programs are required.

The Programs and Policies section addresses the following goals:
 To increase housing opportunities for South Lake Tahoe residents of all economic levels.
 To encourage construction and maintenance of affordable housing in South Lake Tahoe.
 To preserve and enhance the existing supply of housing  To provide a range of housing services for households with special needs within South Lake Tahoe
 To provide decent housing and quality living environments for all South Lake Tahoe residents, regardless of age, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, national origin, disability, or economic level.  To ensure energy efficiency and appropriate weatherization for all new and existing housing.
 To provide for a variety of housing types, sizes, price ranges, and densities compatible with the existing character and integrity of residential neighborhoods. 1663
City Council Report September 8, 2026 5 of 6
In addition to policies and programs required by state law, the Housing Element update includes many policies and programs specific to local housing needs developed through local input and discussion. There are 45 programs organized under the 7 goals listed previously. The bulk of the programs are under the following goals: 6 new construction programs, 15 affordable housing programs, and 10 programs for rehabilitation and conservation. The other programs are separate programs but tie closely into the three goals listed. There are also key programs that directly correspond to the key outreach findings from community stakeholders to ensure alignment with community needs.

These policies and programs are designed to address constraints and opportunities to improve housing affordability, reduce barriers to housing availability, and increase access to housing opportunities for residents in the City.

At the August 20th Planning Commission meeting, commissioners received a report on the draft housing element, discussed and asked questions of staff but did not provide suggested changes or additions to the draft Housing Element and are recommending the draft 2027 – 2035 Housing Element.

Staff is presenting the draft 2027 – 2035 Housing Element to receive City Council and public comment on the current document prior to submission to California Department of Housing and Community Development for review.

Financial Implications: There are no direct financial implications with reviewing the draft 2027 – 2035 Housing Element. Any future funding allocated towards specific programs in the Housing Element would be approved by the City Council at a future date.

The City entered into the Professional Services Agreement on November 4, 2025 with Placeworks for up to $200,000. As of August 26, 2026, Placeworks has been paid $103,891.52.

Environmental Considerations: The proposed Housing Element is consistent with the 2030 General Plan and directly implements several of the General Plan policies. The 2030 General Plan EIR adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Housing Element. The General Plan EIR is available on the City website at: https://www.cityofslt.gov/DocumentCenter/View/15121/General-Plan-EnvironmentalImpact-Report?bidId= Policy Implications: State housing element law (Government Code Section 65580) mandates that local governments must adequately plan to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community.

This item is consistent with the following adopted policies and programs:

City General Plan Housing Element
1664
City Council Report September 8, 2026 6 of 6
Policy 1-3. The City shall adopt programs, ordinances, incentives, land use plans and other regulatory mechanisms that provide opportunities for the private sector to address the housing needs of citizens of all economic levels.

Policy 2-5. The City shall encourage a range of housing options so that people who work in South Lake Tahoe can choose to live in the city.

Policy 5-1. The City shall promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of source of income, age, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, marital/familial status, national origin, disability, economic level, or other barriers that prevent choice in housing.

Program 1-8. Housing Element Implementation Progress
 The City shall annually conduct a public workshop or public meeting to discuss progress on housing programs and to solicit feedback.
1665
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
651 Bannon St.

Sacramento, CA 95811
www.hcd.ca.gov
August 7, 2025
Zachary Thomas, Development Services Director ***CORRECTED*** City of South Lake Tahoe
1052 Tata Lane
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Dear Zachary Thomas:

RE: 7th Cycle Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) and Housing Element Update This letter provides the City of South Lake Tahoe with its final RHNA. Pursuant to State Housing Element Law (Government Code section 65584.06), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is required to provide the allocation to cities without a council of governments.

RHNA Total
Acutely
Low
Income
Extremely
Low
Income
Very
Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Income
Housing
Unit Need 291 14 22 27 42 53 133
Percentage 100% 4.7% 7.5% 9.3% 14.6% 18.4% 45.5%
South Lake Tahoe is not in the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) planning area but is included in the California Department of Finance’s population and household projections for El Dorado County. As a result, the households projected by Tahoe Regional Planning Authority (TRPA) for the 7th RHNA cycle (291 units) will not be included in the 7th cycle Regional Housing Needs Determination for the SACOG region.

HCD is also providing a reminder that Government Code Section 65588(e)(3)(A) requires the City of South Lake Tahoe’s Housing Element to be updated and adopted by January 31, 2027.

The RHNA represents the minimum amount of residential development capacity, by income category, that a jurisdiction must plan for and address in its Housing Element.

The Housing Element must accommodate the RHNA through zoning and appropriate development strategies. RHNA cannot be used in local general plans as a maximum amount or cap of residential development to plan for or approve. South Lake Tahoe is responsible for updating their housing element for the planning period beginning January 31, 2027 and ending January 31, 2035, to accommodate South Lake Tahoe’s new housing needs for each income category. In updating the jurisdiction’s Housing 1666
Zachary Thomas, Development Services Director

Page 2 ends

South Lake Tahoe City CouncilSeptember 8, 2026

South Lake Tahoe City Council
September 8, 2026