Cities Index.
Agenda packet

South Pasadena City Council
March 16, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
March 16, 2022
Body
South Pasadena City Council
Pages
9
Original file
10.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.southpasadenaca.gov. That file is the official record.

City of South Pasadena Page 1

275167.1

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA

CITY COUNCIL

A G E N D A

SPECIAL MEETING

CLOSED SESSION
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 2022
5:30 P.M.

City Manager’s Conference Room, Second Floor, City Hall 1414 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA 91030

NOTICE ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & ACCESSIBILITY
The South Pasadena Special City Council Meeting Closed Session for March 16, 2022 will be conducted in-person from the City Manager’s Conference Room, Second Floor, City Hall, 1414 Mission Street, South Pasadena. Pursuant to, Government Code section 54953, subdivision (e)(3), the City Council may also allow public participation to continue via live public comment conducted over ZOOM.

Please be advised that to ensure the health and safety of the public, staff, and City Council, as the meeting will be open to the public for the meeting and members of the public may attend and/or participate in the in-person meeting, all are kindly reminded to follow Los Angeles County Public Health and CDC regulations and guidelines that are in place and may be posted.

Public comment regarding items on the Closed Session agenda will be taken at the beginning of the meeting. The public will be released from the meeting so that the Council can convene closed session discussion of items allowed under the Government Code. Any reportable action taken in closed session will be reported by the City Attorney during the next open session meeting. A separate Zoom webinar link will be provided for the open session for the public to attend.

The Meeting will be available
• In Person Hybrid – City Hall, City Manager’s Conference Room, Second Floor, 1414 Mission St • Via Zoom:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/2264427248?pwd=aEFuSGszQ2I5WjJkemloTms0RTlVUT09 ID: 226 442 7248
Public Comments participation may be made as follows:
• Written Comment submitted by no later than meeting day, 12:00 PM, deadline via the website. • In Person Hybrid – City Manager’s Conference Room, Second Floor, 1414 Mission Street Via Zoom (see Public Comment Section below for instructions.) To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can observe the public portion of the meeting via Zoom in one of the three methods below.

1. Go to the Zoom website, https://zoom.us/join and enter the Zoom Meeting information; or

2. Click on the following unique Zoom meeting link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/2264427248?pwd=aEFuSGszQ2I5WjJkemloTms0RTlVUT09 or

3. You may listen to the meeting by calling: +1-669-900-6833 and entering the Zoom Meeting ID and Passcode when prompted.

For additional Zoom assistance with telephone audio, you may find your local number at:
https://zoom.us/u/aiXV0TAW2
Special Closed Session Agenda
5:30 PM South Pasadena City Council March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

275167.1
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Michael Cacciotti
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Cacciotti
Mayor Pro Tem Jon Primuth
Councilmember Jack Donovan
Councilmember Diana Mahmud
Councilmember Evelyn G. Zneimer
Public comment regarding items on the Closed Session agenda will be taken at the beginning of the meeting. Public comment will be accepted in person, via Zoom, or written comment.

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEMS
A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
(Government Code Section 54957.6)
Conference with Labor Negotiators regarding labor negotiations with the following groups:
- South Pasadena Police Officers’ Association
- South Pasadena Firefighters’ Association
- South Pasadena Public Service Employees’ Association
- South Pasadena Public Service Part Time Employees’ Association City Negotiators: City Manager Arminé Chaparyan; Human Resources and Risk Manager Belinda Varela
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION
(Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1))

1. City of South Pasadena v. California Department of Transportation (LASC Case No.21STCP01779)
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: INITIATION OF LITIGATION Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
Number of Potential Cases: 3
D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: POTENTIAL OF LITIGATION Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Number of Potential Cases: 1

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I declare under penalty of perjury that I posted this notice of agenda for the meeting to be held on March 16, 2022, on the bulletin board in the courtyard of City Hall at 1414 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA 91030, and on the City’s, website as required by law, on the date listed below. 3/10/2022 /S/
Date Christina A. Muñoz, Deputy City Clerk

PUBLIC COMMENT
City of South Pasadena Page 1
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Michael Cacciotti
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Cacciotti
Mayor Pro Tem Jon Primuth
Councilmember Jack Donovan
Councilmember Diana Mahmud
Councilmember Evelyn G. Zneimer
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Michael Cacciotti

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA

CITY COUNCIL

A G E N D A

REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 2022, AT 7:00 P.M.

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1424 MISSION STREET, SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
South Pasadena City Council Statement of Civility
As your elected governing board, we will treat each other, members of the public, and city employees with patience, civility and courtesy as a model of the same behavior we wish to reflect in South Pasadena for the conduct of all city business and community participation. The decisions made tonight will be for the benefit of the South Pasadena community and not for personal gain.

NOTICE ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & ACCESSIBILITY
Pursuant to AB 361 Government Code section 54953, subdivision (e)(3), the City Council may conduct its meetings remotely and may be held via video conference. Pursuant to such Executive Order, the City Council may participate remotely and not be physically present in the City Council Chambers. Until further notice and as such Executive Orders remain in effect, the City Council may also allow public participation to continue via live public comment conducted over ZOOM.

The South Pasadena City Council Meeting for March 16, 2022 will be conducted in-person from the Council Chambers, Amedee O. “Dick” Richards, Jr., located at 1424 Mission Street, South Pasadena.

Please be advised that pursuant to government code, and to ensure the health and safety of the public, staff, and City Council, as the Council Chambers will be open to the public for the meeting and members of the public may attend and/or participate in the in-person meeting, all are kindly reminded to follow Los Angeles County Public Health and CDC regulations and guidelines that are in place and may be posted. The In-person Hybrid meeting will be conducted live in the City Council Chambers.

The Meeting will be available
• In Person Hybrid – City Council Chambers, 1424 Mission Street • Live Broadcast via the website – http://www.spectrumstream.com/streaming/south_pasadena/live.cfm • Via Zoom – Webinar ID: 825 9999 2830

To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can observe the meeting via Zoom in one of the three methods below.

1. Go to the Zoom website, https://zoom.us/join and enter the Zoom Meeting information; or

2. Click on the following unique Zoom meeting link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82599992830or

3. You may listen to the meeting by calling: +1-669-900-6833 and entering the Zoom Meeting ID.

Regular Meeting Agenda South Pasadena City Council March 16, 2022 City of South Pasadena Page 2

PUBLIC COMMENT GUIDELINES
The City Council welcomes public input. Members of the public can comment on a non-agenda subject under the jurisdiction of the City Council or on an agenda item, you may participate by one of the following options:

Option 1:

Participate in-person at the City Council Chambers.

Option 2:

Public Comment speakers have three minutes to address the Council, however, the Mayor and City Council can adjust time allotted as needed. Participants will be able to “raise their hand” using the Zoom icon during the meeting, and they will have their microphone un-muted during comment portions of the agenda to speak. for up to three minutes per item.

Option 3:

Email public comment(s) to [email protected].

Public Comments received in writing will not be read aloud at the meeting, but will be part of the meeting record.

Written public comments will be uploaded online for public viewing under Additional Documents. There is no word limit on emailed Public Comment(s). Please make sure to indicate:
1) Name (optional), and
2) Agenda item you are submitting public comment on.
3) Submit by no later than 12:00 p.m., on the day of the Council meeting.

PLEASE NOTE: The Mayor may exercise the Chair's discretion, subject to the approval of the majority of the City Council, to adjust public comment(s) to less than three minutes.

Pursuant to State law, the City Council may not discuss or take action on issues not on the meeting agenda, except that members of the City Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising public testimony rights (Government Code Section 54954.2). Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS

1. CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS

PUBLIC COMMENT

2. PUBLIC COMMENT – GENERAL (NON-AGENDA ITEMS)
General Public Comment will be limited to 30 minutes at the beginning of the agenda. If there are speakers remaining in the queue, they will be heard at the end of the meeting. Only Speakers who sign up in the first 30 minutes of public comment will be queued up to speak.

3. MERCHANT MINUTE
Waverly LA, Sandy Olivas

4. INTRODUCTION OF STAFF
Deputy Community Services Director Lucy Hakobian
Community Improvement Coordinator Christopher Mandala

PRESENTATIONS
Regular Meeting Agenda South Pasadena City Council March 16, 2022 City of South Pasadena Page 3

COMMUNICATIONS

5. COUNCILMEMBER COMMUNICATIONS
Time allotted per Councilmember is 3 minutes. Additional time will be allotted at the end of the City Council meeting agenda, if necessary.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS

7. REORDERING OF, ADDITIONS, OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA

CONSENT CALENDAR

OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON CONSENT CALENDAR
Items listed under the consent calendar are considered by the City Manager to be routine in nature and will be enacted by one motion unless a public comment has been received or Councilmember requests otherwise, in which case the item will be removed for separate consideration. Any motion relating to an ordinance or a resolution shall also waive the reading of the ordinance or resolution and include its introduction or adoption as appropriate.

8. APPROVAL OF PREPAID WARRANTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,336.19; GENERAL CITY WARRANTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,325,835.95; SUPPLEMENTAL AUTOMATED CLEARING HOUSE (ACH) PAYMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $93,150.05; VOIDS IN THE AMOUNT OF ($1,688.48): TRANSFERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000,000; PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,038,411.98
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Warrants as presented.

9. MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR JANUARY 2022
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the Monthly Investment Report for January 2022.

10. SELECTION OF OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) TRUSTEE

RESOLUTION

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AGREEMENT TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE PREFUNDING PLAN FOR OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) THROUGH CALPERS – CERBT

RESOLUTION

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO REQUEST

DISBURSEMENTS FROM CALPERS OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT

BENEFITS (OPEB) PREFUNDING PLAN
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Select CalPERS – CERBT as the City’s OPEB Trustee;

2. Adopt a resolution to participate in OPEB Prefunding through CalPERS;

3. Adopt a resolution for the Delegation of Authority to Request Disbursements; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute appropriate documents to secure trustee.

Regular Meeting Agenda South Pasadena City Council March 16, 2022 City of South Pasadena Page 4

11. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S COMPLIANCE

WITH MANDATED INSPECTION DUTIES

RESOLUTION

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

MANDATED INSPECTION DUTIES
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution acknowledging receipt of the Fire Department’s annual report of compliance for mandated inspection duties.

12. AUTHORIZE REAPPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS TO CITY BOARDS AND

COMMISSIONS
Recommendation
It is recommended by Mayor Cacciotti that the City Council reappoint the following incumbents to the three-year term ending December 31, 2024:
• Kristin Morrish, Cultural Heritage Commission
• Samantha Hill, Design Review Board
• Kay Younger, Design Review Board
• Zhen Tao, Finance Commission
• Bianca Richards, Library Board of Trustees
• Kim Hughes, Mobility and Transportation Infrastructure Commission • John Fisher, Mobility and Transportation Infrastructure Commission • Rona Bortz, Natural Resources and Environmental Commission • Casey Law, Natural Resources and Environmental Commission • Laura Dahl, Planning Commission
• Ed Donnelly, Public Safety Commission
• Stephanie Cao, Public Safety Commission
• Amin Al-Sarraf, Public Safety Commission
• Frank Catania, Public Works Commission

13. APPROVAL OF MAYOR’S LIST OF CITY COUNCIL LIAISON AND REGIONAL GROUP

APPOINTMENTS AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPOINTING DELEGATES,

REPRESENTATIVES, AND ALTERNATES TO VARIOUS AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

RESOLUTION

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING DELEGATES,

REPRESENTATIVES, AND ALTERNATES AS OFFICIAL

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve the Mayor’s list of City Council Liaison and Regional Group Appointments to various commissions, boards, and committees; and

2. Adopt a Resolution appointing delegates, representatives, and alternates as official representatives of the City of South Pasadena.

Regular Meeting Agenda South Pasadena City Council March 16, 2022 City of South Pasadena Page 5

14. AUTHORIZE SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR 1503-1507 EL CENTRO

STREET WITH STEPHEN GODWIN AND SALLY SMYTHE
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council direct City Manager to enter into an amended lease agreement for South Pasadena Housing Authority owned property at 1503-1507 El Centro Street with Stephen Godwin and Sally Smythe.

ITEM 15 WILL BE HEARD AT 7:30 PM PER ELECTIONS CODE 21607.1.(D) (d) If a public hearing is consolidated with a regular or special meeting of the council that includes other substantive agenda items, the public hearing shall begin at a fixed time regardless of its order on the agenda, except that the council may first conclude any item being discussed or acted upon, including any associated public comment, when that time occurs. The time of the public hearing shall be noticed to the public.

15. PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE PUBLIC INPUT REGARDING BOUNDARIES FOR SOUTH PASADENA CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS; AND FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION OF

AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING A CITY COUNCIL ELECTION DISTRICT MAP AS

REQUIRED BY THE ELECTIONS CODE

ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CITY COUNCIL ELECTION
DISTRICT MAP UNDER ELECTIONS CODE SECTIONS 21600–21609
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input regarding the boundaries of potential City Council election districts based on 2020 U.S. Census data, as required by applicable law;

2. Review draft map(s); and

3. Read by title only for first reading, waving further reading, and introduce an ordinance designating a City Council Election District Map under Elections Code Sections 21600- 21609.

16. FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20F, OF

THE SOUTH PASADENA MUNICIPAL CODE (SPMC) REGARDING SAFE STORAGE OF

FIREARMS IN RESIDENCES

ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 20F “SAFE STORAGE
OF FIREARMS IN RESIDENCES” TO THE SOUTH PASADENA

MUNICIPAL CODE
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council read by title only for first reading, waiving further reading, and introduce an ordinance to amend Chapter 20F of the South Pasadena Municipal Code, Safe Storage of Firearms in Residences.

PUBLIC HEARING
Regular Meeting Agenda South Pasadena City Council March 16, 2022 City of South Pasadena Page 6

17. DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION ON INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE:

DEVELOPMENT OF IN-LIEU FEE
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council review and provide direction on the options for establishing an inclusionary housing in-lieu fee.

18. AUTHORIZE A LETTER OF SUPPORT TO ELECTED OFFICIALS URGING STRICTER

REGULATIONS ON THE RECYCLING INDUSTRY WHEN RECEIVING CATALYTIC

CONVERTERS
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council authorize a letter of support for Senate Bill 919, Senate Bill 366, Assembly Bill 1653, Assembly Bill 1659, and request to establish a task force or Blue Ribbon Committee to hear testimony regarding stricter regulations on the recycling industry when receiving catalytic converters.

INFORMATION REPORTS – NONE
PUBLIC COMMENT – CONTINUED

19. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENT – GENERAL
This time is reserved for speakers in the public comment queue not heard during the first 30 minutes of Item 2. No new speakers will be accepted at this time.

ADJOURNMENT

FOR YOUR INFORMATION

FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

PUBLIC ACCESS TO AGENDA DOCUMENTS AND BROADCASTING OF MEETINGS City Council meeting agenda packets, any agenda related documents, and additional documents are available online for public inspection on the City’s website:
www.southpasadenaca.gov/CityCouncilMeetings2022
Regular meetings are live streamed via the internet at:
http://www.spectrumstream.com/streaming/south_pasadena/live.cfm

AGENDA NOTIFICATION SUBSCRIPTION
If you wish to receive an agenda email notification please contact the City Clerk’s Division via email at [email protected] or call (626) 403-7230.

ACTION / DISCUSSION
April 6, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting 7:00 p.m.

April 20, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting 7:00 p.m.

Regular Meeting Agenda South Pasadena City Council March 16, 2022 City of South Pasadena Page 7

ACCOMMODATIONS
The City of South Pasadena wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. If special assistance is needed to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Division at (626) 403-7230 or [email protected]. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I declare under penalty of perjury that I posted this notice of agenda for the meeting to be held on March 16, 2022, on the bulletin board in the courtyard of City Hall at 1414 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA 91030, and on the City’s, website as required by law, on the date listed below. 3/10/2022 /S/
Date Christina A. Muñoz, Deputy City Clerk
8 - 1
8 Approval of Warrants
March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

Commission Review and Recommendation
This matter was not reviewed by a Commission.

Attachments:

1. Warrant Summary

2. Prepaid Warrant List

3. General City Warrant List

4. Supplemental ACH Payments

5. Voids

6. Payroll
8 - 2
ATTACHMENT 1
Warrant Summary
8 - 3
City of South Pasadena
Demand/Warrant Register Date 3/16/2022
Recap by fund Fund No.

Prepaid Written
General Fund 101 17,263.19 403,592.38
Insurance Fund 103 - -
Street Improvement Program 104 - -
Facilities & Equip.Cap. Fund 105 - 41,677.74
Programs and Projects 107 - 16,494.06
Local Transit Return "A" 205 - 6,722.93
Local Transit Return "C" 207 - 199.00
TEA/Metro 208 - -
Sewer Fund 210 - 2,697.47
CTC Traffic Improvement 211 - -
Street Lighting Fund 215 - 30,071.32
Public,Education & Govt Fund 217 - -
Clean Air Act Fund 218 - -
Business Improvement Tax 220 - -
Gold Line Mitigation Fund 223 - -
Mission Meridian Public Garage 226 - 1,608.26
Housing Authority Fund 228 - -
State Gas Tax 230 - 10,439.63
County Park Bond Fund 232 - 5,012.55
Measure R 233 - -
Measure M 236 - -
Road Maint & Rehab (SB1) 237 - -
MSRC Grant Fund 238 - -
Measure W 239 - -
Measure H 241 - -
Prop C Exchange Fund 242 - -
Bike & Pedestrian Paths 245 - -
BTA Grants 248 - -
Golden Street Grant 249 - -
Capital Growth Fund 255 - -
CDBG 260 - -
Asset Forfeiture 270 - -
Police Grants - State 272 - -
Homeland Security Grant 274 - -
Park Impact Fees 275 - -
Historic Preservation Grant 276 - -
HSIP Grant 277 - -
Arroyo Seco Golf Course 295 - -
Sewer Capital Projects Fund 310 - -
Water Fund 500 73.00 54,200.99
Water Efficinency Fund 503 - 51.33
2016 Water Revenue Bonds Fund 505 - 753,068.29
SRF Loan - Water 506 - -
Water & Sewer Impact Fee 510 - -
Public Financing Authority 550 - -
Payroll Clearing Fund 700 - -
-
Column Totals: 17,336.19 1,325,835.95
Recap by fund Fund No.

Prepaid Written
RSA 227 - -
RSA Report Totals: - -
City Report Totals: 1,343,172.14
Payroll Period Ending: 03/04/2022 1,038,411.98
Wire Transfer Out - To LAIF
Wire Transfer In - From LAIF 3,000,000.00
Wire Transfer - RSA
Wire Transfer Out - To Acct. # 2413
Wire Transfer Out - To Acct. # 1936
Supplemental ACH Payments 93,150.05
Voids - Prepaid
Voids - General Warrant (1,688.48)
Grand Report Total: 5,473,045.69
Amounts
Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
City Clerk
Amounts
Kenneth L. Louie, Interim Finance Director
8 - 4
ATTACHMENT 2
Prepaid Warrant List
8 - 5
Accounts Payable
User:

Printed:
ealvarez
3/4/2022 10:00 AM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
ACH CRDA1021 Corodata Records Management 03/03/2022
RS4742495 Records Management: October 2021 Additional Services 386.74 RS4742495 Records Management: October 2021 373.74
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor CRDA1021: 760.48
314060 KVMC6710 Kelvin Machado 03/03/2022
313803-Reissue Reisue Lost Check # 313803: Mileage Call Outs 10/29/21-11/14/21 73.00 Total for Check Number 314060: 73.00
Total for 3/3/2022: 833.48
Report Total (2 checks): 833.48
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/4/2022 10:00 AM) Page 1 8 - 6
Accounts Payable
User:

Printed:
ealvarez
3/9/2022 12:49 PM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
ACH COBR7131 The Advantage Group 03/09/2022
137580 December 2021 Admin Fee 324.00
139575 February 2022 Admin Fee 324.00
March 2022 March 2022 HRA Premium Reimbursement 15,854.71 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor COBR7131: 16,502.71 Total for 3/9/2022: 16,502.71
Report Total (1 checks): 16,502.71
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 12:49 PM) Page 1 8 - 7
ATTACHMENT 3 General
City Warrant List
8 - 8
Accounts Payable
User:

Printed:
ealvarez
3/9/2022 4:18 PM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
ACH AIR6010 Airgas USA LLC 03/16/2022
9986919254 Oxygen Supplies: February 2022 320.20
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor AIR6010: 320.20
ACH BB&K Best Best & Krieger LLP 03/16/2022
922960 Litigation 9,856.50
924513 Litigation 1,063.50
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor BB&K: 10,920.00
BLSP8010 Blackstone Publishing
03/16/2022
ACH
2025682 Books/DVDs/CDs 669.51
2025838 Books/DVDs/CDs 65.90
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor BLSP8010: 735.41
ACH BNYM6712
SOPASWTR16 750,818.75
SOPASWTR16
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A
2016 Water Revenue Bond - Interest Payment
2016 Water Revenue Bond - Cash on Hand -0.46
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor BNYM6712: 750,818.29 ACH BSHL6710 dba Jan Point Base Hill, Inc. 03/16/2022
21468 Citywide Janitorial Services February 2022 956.07 21468 Citywide Janitorial Services February 2022 875.00 21468 Citywide Janitorial Services February 2022 11,241.92 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor BSHL6710: 13,072.99 ACH CDW5246 CDW Government LLC 03/16/2022
S623642 Surface Pro 7: Qty # 2 4,264.82
S623654 Surface Pro 7 - Qty # 10 21,324.09
S683502 MS Surface Pro WTY COMP BUS Adaptor: Qty # 10 2,473.80 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor CDW5246: 28,062.71
ACH CHWP2010 Colantuono,Highsmith & Whatley,PC 03/16/2022 50648 General Services: January 2022 10,000.00
50649 Labor & Employment: January 2022 13,517.00
50650 Litigation: January 2022 196.00
50651 Water & Utilies: January 2022 1,813.00
50652 Special Projects: January 2022 5,440.50
50653 Litigation: January 2022 1,642.40
50654 Litigation: January 2022 13,975.76
50655 Litigation: January 2022 24.50
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor CHWP2010: 46,609.16 ACH DEL4000 Dell Marketing L.P. 03/16/2022
10563867971 Dell Sonicwall Comprehensive Security Subscription Lease 1 Year 389.64 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 1 03/16/2022
8 - 9
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
10563867980 Advanced Gateway Security Suite & SUP Svcs. Reinstatement for NS 2,817.85 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor DEL4000: 3,207.49
ACH DIG0800 Digital Telecommunications Corp 03/16/2022
44276 Monthly Contract for IT Phones: 03/01/22-03/31/22 984.00 44348 Monthly Contract for IT Phones: 04/01/22-04/30/22 984.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor DIG0800: 1,968.00
ACH EEPS7000 Express Services Inc. 03/16/2022
26467246 Contract Services for Park, Sewer, and Street Maint. 3,944.00 26496145 Contract Services for Park, Sewer, and Street Maint. 2,958.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor EEPS7000: 6,902.00
ACH GPPT9090 The Silver Bullet Corporation 03/16/2022
520277 Gopher Abatement Arroyo Park 1/11/2022 250.00
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor GPPT9090: 250.00
ACH JHMS8020 JHM Supply 03/16/2022
281601/1 Irrigation Supplies-Dog Park 9.56
282397/1 Irrigation Supplies-Arroyo Park 180.45
283028/1 Water Pipe Fittings Supplies for Water Division-Backflow repairs 215.08 283707/1 Park Division Irrigation Supplies-Rake Replacements 65.84 283757/1 Water Pipe Fittings Supplies for Water Division-Pump 627.72 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor JHMS8020: 1,098.65
ACH LDCR6410 LandCare USA LLC 03/16/2022
459895 Landscape Median Strips-November 2021 2,874.23
459895 Landscape Median Strips-November 2021 1,353.07
459895 Park Maintenance Contract Services-November 2021 16,464.22 459895 Water Distribution-November 2021 1,669.68
459895 Prop A Park Maintenance-Nevember 2021 1,233.21
474986 Landscape Median Strips-December 2021 4,337.77
474986 Water Distribution-December 2021 1,669.68
474986 Prop A Park Maintenance-December 2021 1,233.21
474986 Park Maintenance Contract Services-December 2021 16,464.22 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor LDCR6410: 47,299.29 ACH MIGINC MIG, INC. 03/16/2022
0072566 Contract Planning Services: 10/18/21-11/30/21 14,887.50 0073194 Contract Planning Services: 12/01/21-12/31/21 13,162.50 0073643 Contract Planning Services: 01/01/22-01/31/22 3,712.50 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor MIGINC: 31,762.50
ACH MNBL8170 Crestline Software, LLC dba MuniBilling 03/16/2022 14741 Absorb Charges (Jan 2022) 10,629.62
14741 Lock Box 830.50
14741 Water Billing Services (Feb 2022) 24,638.25
14818 Postage (Jan 2022) 1,892.21
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor MNBL8170: 37,990.58 ACH POS5265 Post Alarm Systems 03/16/2022
1452527 Alarm System for WMB 03/01/2022-03/31/2022 54.33 1452527 Alarm System for Orange Grove Rec. Building 03/01/2022-03/31/22 54.33 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 2 8 - 10
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor POS5265: 108.66
ACH RED8995 Red Wing Business Advantage Account 03/16/2022 989-1-58794 Public Works Footware Voucher Program-Felipe Morales-Water Div. 250.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor RED8995: 250.00
ACH RIN7777 Rincon Consultants, Inc. 03/16/2022
20801 1733 Hanscom Project Expediting 3,900.00
22077 1319 Stratford Project Expediting 796.25
23661 822 Orange Grove CHC Project Expediting 4,026.25
23662 1502 Bank Project Expediting 3,881.25
24513 925 Palm Project Expediting 2,023.75
24520 822 Orange Grove CHC Project Expediting 605.00
25261 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 985.00
25420 925 Palm Project Expediting 1,621.25
26002 1502 Bank Project Expediting 3,208.75
26377 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 1,258.75
26379 925 Palm Project Expediting 1,795.00
26717 822 Orange Grove CHC Project Expediting 167.50
26874 1230 Kolle Project Expediting 2,261.25
26876 1502 Bank Project Expediting 741.25
26947 804 Milan Project Expediting 1,578.75
27448 1502 Bank Project Expediting 901.25
27553 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 1,518.75
27641 822 Orange Grove DRX Project Expediting 1,058.75
28282 1230 Kolle Project Expediting 3,102.50
28284 1502 Bank Project Expediting 3,176.25
28410 804 Milan Project Expediting 3,620.00
29083 1230 Kolle Project Expediting 530.00
29668 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 1,012.50
29669 1230 Kolle Project Expediting 121.25
29673 804 Milan Project Expediting 460.00
29675 1020 Milan Project Expediting 1,901.25
29676 822 Orange Grove DRX Project Expediting 2,531.25
29681 1103 Monterey Project Expediting 1,300.00
30293 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 2,735.00
30297 822 Orange Grove DRX Project Expediting 2,781.25
30301 1103 Monterey Project Expediting 785.00
30991 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 2,558.75
30992 1230 Kolle Project Expediting 51.25
30994 1020 Milan Project Expediting 1,565.00
30995 822 Orange Grove DRX Project Expediting 348.75
30997 2002 Oak Project Expediting 2,215.00
30998 1103 Monterey Project Expediting 1,077.50
30999 237 Monterey Road Project Expediting 887.50
31438 152-154 St. Albans Project Expediting 822.50
31439 804 Milan Project Expediting 102.50
31441 1020 Milan Project Expediting 1,783.75
31442 1507 Garfield Project Expediting 1,393.75
31443 2002 Oak Project Expediting 1,133.75
32509 152-154 St. Albans Project Expediting 130.00
32510 1020 Milan Project Expediting 162.50
32511 1507 Garfield Project Expediting 422.50
32512 2002 Oak Project Expediting 65.00
32513 237 Monterey Road Project Expediting 130.00
33153 1900 Alpha Project Expediting 1,202.50
33951 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 218.75
33952 1507 Garfield Project Expediting 251.25
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 3 8 - 11
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
33953 1900 Alpha Project Expediting 1,133.75
34802 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 1,667.50
34803 1507 Garfield Project Expediting 140.00
34804 1900 Alpha Project Expediting 270.00
34805 512 Grand Project Expediting 850.00
34806 606 Fair Oaks Project Expediting 617.50
35581 1502 Indiana Project Expediting 618.75
35582 1900 Alpha Project Expediting 822.50
35583 512 Grand Project Expediting 283.75
35584 606 Fair Oaks Project Expediting 367.50
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor RIN7777: 79,678.75
ACH SHO7777 Showcases 03/16/2022
322632 Poly Capacity CD cases 425.79
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor SHO7777: 425.79
ACH SPBK Springbrook Holding Company LLC 03/16/2022
INV-008477 CivicPay Transaction Fee 156.00
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor SPBK: 156.00
ACH STA5219 Staples Business Advantage 03/16/2022
3489512974 City Manager Office Supplies 67.26
3489906817 City Manager Office Supplies 373.53
3494788694 City Manager Office Supplies 31.95
34949388278 City Manager Office Supplies 59.23
3497373078 Office Supplies 83.52
3497678141 City Manager Office Supplies 207.70
3497932647 City Manager Office Supplies 15.98
3497932648 Credit Memo -101.26
3500289038 Fire Department Supplies 154.85
3500353191 Fire Department Supplies 40.29
3500591388 PD Office Supplies 418.94
3500689246 Office Supplies 32.51
3500829016 Office Supplies 40.04
3500947780 Management Services Office Supllies 29.64
3500947781 Management Services Office Supllies 83.01
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor STA5219: 1,537.19
ACH STSM1020 Studio Spectrum 03/16/2022
191912 Streaming Services: 07/07/2021-07/21/2021 3,000.00 191937 Streaming Services: August'21 to November'21 1,425.00 191964 Streaming Services: 09/01/2021-09/15/2021 2,700.00 191985 Streaming Services: 10/06/21-10/27/2021 7,680.00 192016 Streaming Services: December 2021 3,150.00
192040 Streaming Services: January 2022 2,700.00
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor STSM1020: 20,655.00 ACH VUL6601 Vulcan Materials Company 03/16/2022
73165682 Street Division Supplies: Asphalt Storage at Yard 1,917.65 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor VUL6601: 1,917.65
ACH WES4152 West Coast Arborists, Inc. 03/16/2022
182538 Citywide Urban Forestry Services 2/1/2022-2/9/2022 21,000.00 182538 Citywide Urban Forestry Services 2/1/2022-2/9/2022 1,440.00 182539 Citywide Urban Forestry Services 2/10/2022-2/15/2022 600.00 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 4 8 - 12
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
182539 Citywide Urban Forestry Services 2/10/2022-2/15/2022 1,768.00 182539 Citywide Urban Forestry Services 2/10/2022-2/15/2022 15,600.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor WES4152: 40,408.00
ACH WLST8267 William Shuttic 03/16/2022
February 2022 Contract class Instructor Payment-Functional Fitness February'22 500.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor WLST8267: 500.00
314061 ACMT2920 All City Management Services, Inc. 03/16/2022 75216 Crossing Guard Services for FY2021-22 1/23/22-2/5/22 9,179.44 Total for Check Number 314061: 9,179.44
314062 ALL0197 All Star Fire Equipment, Inc. 03/16/2022 237883 Fire Dept. - Safety Clothing & Equipment 683.55
Total for Check Number 314062: 683.55
314063 ANT0243 Antrim's Security Co., Inc. 03/16/2022
59628 Push Button Lock and Key 39.69
Total for Check Number 314063: 39.69
314064 ACSS6712 Arbitrage Compliance Specialists 03/16/2022 1030164 2016 Wtr, Revenu Bond Arbitrage Rebate Calculations 5th Year 2,250.00 Total for Check Number 314064: 2,250.00
314065 ARCD6011 ARC Document Solutions 03/16/2022
11073664 Printing of maps 203.47
Total for Check Number 314065: 203.47
314066 ATTM4011 AT & T Mobility 03/16/2022
287288006612X02 PWD Cellphone Billing Cycle Jan-Feb 2022-Sewer 61.36 287288006612X02 PWD Cellphone Billing Cycle Jan-Feb 2022-Water Division 178.32 287288006612X02 PWD Cellphone Billing Cycle Jan-Feb 2022-Water Division 235.32 287288006612X02 PWD Cellphone Billing Cycle Jan-Feb 2022-PW Eng,Oper & Hot Spots 649.15 Total for Check Number 314066: 1,124.15
314067 AT&T5011 AT&T 03/16/2022
626441-64973570 Account # 626-441-6497 357 0 (02/13/22-03/12/22) 971.83 626577-66572137 Account # 626- 577-6657 213 7 (02/13/22-03/12/22) 56.94 Total for Check Number 314067: 1,028.77
314068 ATCN9011 AT&T 03/16/2022
000017796823 Account # 9391062308 (01/20/22-02/19/22) 14,689.10 Total for Check Number 314068: 14,689.10
314069 CIN4011 AT&T Mobility 03/16/2022
287014917916X02 Account # 287014917916 (01/09/22 - 02/08/22) 1,417.17 287299554301X02 Account # 287299554301 (01-20-22 - 02-19-22) 44.58 Total for Check Number 314069: 1,461.75
314070 ATSS6010 Athens Services 03/16/2022
11672013 Athens Street Sweeping Services @ Mission Meridian January 2022 840.70 11672014 Athens Bus Stop Barrel Pickup-January 2022 2,241.89 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 5 8 - 13
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 314070: 3,082.59
314071 BRDE6710 Luis Bardales Jr. 03/16/2022
12/19/2021 Wilson Reservoir Water Connection Call Out12/19/2021 12.88 12/24/2021 Wilson Reservoir Power outage Call Out12/24/2021 12.88 12/25/2021 Wilson Reservoir Power Outage Call Out12/25/2021 12.88 Total for Check Number 314071: 38.64
314072 BRAS3010 Bartel Associates, LLC 03/16/2022
22-153 Pension Liability Study: City Council Presentation January 2022 1,050.00 Total for Check Number 314072: 1,050.00
314073 JAIBENEV Jaime Benavides 03/16/2022
118784 Refund due to incorrect Camp Med charge. 376.00
Total for Check Number 314073: 376.00
314074 DEP5072 CA Dept of Transportation 03/16/2022
SL220336 Signals & Lighting Shared cost with Caltrans-July-Sep 2021 599.14 Total for Check Number 314074: 599.14
314075 CAL5236 CA Linen Services 03/16/2022
1934384C Fire Station Linen Rental and Cleaning Services -11.86 1947689C Fire Station Linen Rental and Cleaning Services -11.86 1956841 Fire Station Linen Rental and Cleaning Services 91.40 1959314 Fire Station Linen Rental and Cleaning Services 95.26 Total for Check Number 314075: 162.94
314076 CAN0607 Cantu Graphics Inc. 03/16/2022
20363 City Clerk Printing Materials 10.44
20502 Business Cards for Somin Kang 33.02
20715 Business Cards for Community Development 132.08
20720 Management Services Business Cards 165.10
20721 Business Cards for City Manager's Office 99.06
20738 Business Cards for Community Development 33.02
Total for Check Number 314076: 472.72
314077 JMCB6710 Jose Manuel Cipres Bravo 03/16/2022
1/15/2022 Huntington Dr. Water Meter-no water Call Out 1/15/2022 21.88 1/29/2022 Two Water Leak Call Outs 1/29/2022 45.16
12/20/2021 Indiana Ave. Water Leak Call Out 12/20/2021 20.94 12/25/2021 Two Water Turn On/Off Emergency Call Outs 12/25/2021 43.23 12/27/2021 Fair Oaks Meter Turn Off Call Out 12/27/2021 21.62 Total for Check Number 314077: 152.83
314078 ALPD4010 City of Alhambra Police Department 03/16/2022 SP 12/2021 Inmate housing for December 2021 1,806.00
Total for Check Number 314078: 1,806.00
314079 SPMN3010 City of South Pasadena 03/16/2022
14044-02-23-22 14044 Period 12/20/2021- 02/14/2022 381.95 19126-02-16-22 19126 Period 12/13/2021- 02/08/2022 411.88 19386-02-23-22 19386 Period 12/13/2021- 02/08/2022 441.35 19387-02-16-22 19387 Period 12/14/2021- 02/09/2022 435.95 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 6 8 - 14
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 314079: 1,671.13
314080 DVDCORTI David Courtice 03/16/2022
119337 Refunable deposit for WMB 522.00
Total for Check Number 314080: 522.00
314081 ECPLSYTM Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 03/16/2022 214034-2 Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study and Affordable Housing 4,955.00 214034-3 Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study and Affordable Housing 15,468.75 Total for Check Number 314081: 20,423.75
314082 ELL1017 Ellen's Silkscreening 03/16/2022
77371 Emergency COVID-19 Reusable Face Mask Qty # 96 733.16 Total for Check Number 314082: 733.16
314083 EWEM6010 Ewing Irrigation El Monte 03/16/2022
15861920 Fair Oaks Median Adapter & Solenoid Sprinkler Battery 174.98 Total for Check Number 314083: 174.98
314084 FED1109 FedEx 03/16/2022
7-665-49977 Shipment of parking control mobile device for repairs 24.19 Total for Check Number 314084: 24.19
314085 FFCA8060 Foothill Fire Chiefs Association 03/16/2022 2022 Dues Membership Dues 2022 for Paul Riddle 150.00
Total for Check Number 314085: 150.00
314086 SGBM6010 Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation03/16/2022 1319 South Pasadena Sewer Rehabilitation Replacement Project 250.00 Total for Check Number 314086: 250.00
314087 GALL5011 Galls, LLC 03/16/2022
020322279 New Hire Uniform for - S Benites for Fire Dept. 1,274.73 Total for Check Number 314087: 1,274.73
314088 RYAN Ryan Garcia 03/16/2022
12/17/2021 Orange Grove Sewer Call Out 12/17/2021 12.99 Total for Check Number 314088: 12.99
314089 GAR5011 Garvey Equipment Co 03/16/2022
143284 Repair of 14" Power Cutter for Cutting Street Light Poles 169.84 143540 Public Works Parks Division Supplies-Equip. Maint. 204.51 143541 Public Works Parks Division Supplies Equip. Maint. 212.46 Total for Check Number 314089: 586.81
314090 GVRNTAGN Government Training Agency 03/16/2022
58963 Post Records Course for Police Clerk Desiree Rodriguez 04/01/22 525.00 58964 Post Records Course for Police Clerk Nelly Ochoa 04/01/22 525.00 Total for Check Number 314090: 1,050.00
314091 HHA5011 H & H Wholesale Parts 03/16/2022
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 7 8 - 15
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
1IN0482144 Fire Department Vehicle Supplies 136.14
Total for Check Number 314091: 136.14
314092 HAC6711 Hach Company 03/16/2022
12819573 Chlorine Analyzer Reagent Solutions for Water Pump Stations 1,067.06 Total for Check Number 314092: 1,067.06
314093 ADHA6116 Adam Herrera 03/16/2022
1/15/2022 Brunswick & Monterey Spilled Concrete Call Out 1/15/22 23.87 1/22/2022 Pasadena & Arroyo Fallen Tree Call Out 1/22/22 23.87 2/9/2022 Huntington Dr. Service Issue Call Out 2/9/22 24.69 Total for Check Number 314093: 72.43
314094 IBLS6116 Luis Ibarra 03/16/2022
1/22/2022 Three Different Call Outs-Road Debris Clearance 1/22/2022 14.39 12/23/2021 Gates Pl Storm Drain Clearing Call Out 12/23/2021 4.59 12/24/2021 Foothill St. Sewer Back Up Call Out 12/24/2021 4.59 Total for Check Number 314094: 23.57
314095 INF4110 Information Today, Inc. 03/16/2022
1741038-B1 Literary Market Place Directory for Reference Desk 474.03 Total for Check Number 314095: 474.03
314096 INT6115 Interstate Battery Systems of Eastern Los Angeles 03/16/2022 77113 Astrial Lift Battery Replacement 225.85
Total for Check Number 314096: 225.85
314097 JSAR4011 Jack's Auto Repair 03/16/2022
17175 Routine Maintenance of Transit Fleet Vehicle # 80 60.00 Total for Check Number 314097: 60.00
314098 KMTM4011 Timothy Kim 03/16/2022
02/01/2022 Reimb. Training Course Mileage Expense for Officer Kim: 02/01/22 3.51 Total for Check Number 314098: 3.51
314099 ALEXLIU Alex Liu 03/16/2022
053991 Refund due to resident charged incorrect park reservation rate. 125.00 Total for Check Number 314099: 125.00
314100 KVMC6710 Kelvin Machado 03/16/2022
1/1/2022 Mileage Claim-Orange Grove Main Break Call Out 1/1/22 19.07 1/2/2022 Mileage Claim-Windsor Pl Main Break Call Out 1/2/22 19.07 12/27/2021 Oneonta Dr. Emergency Meter Turn Off Call Out 12/27/2021 18.26 12/28/2021 Rollin St. Meter Turn On Call Out 12/28/2021 18.26 12/29/2021 La Senda Emergencyy Turn Off Call Out 12/29/2021 18.26 12/30/2021 Huntington Dr. Meter Leak Call Out 12/30/2021 18.26 Total for Check Number 314100: 111.18
314101 DIMD1010 Diana Mahmud 03/16/2022
119336 Refunable deposit for WMB 522.00
Total for Check Number 314101: 522.00
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 8 8 - 16
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
314102 MGMTPRTN Management Partners Inc. 03/16/2022
INV09985 Finance Department Policy and Procedures Manual 123.00 INV09985 Finance Department Policy and Procedures Manual 2,184.00 INV09985 Finance Department Policy and Procedures Manual 693.00 INV10243 Finance Department Policy and Procedures Manual 779.00 INV10243 Finance Department Policy and Procedures Manual 4,389.00 INV10243 Finance Department Policy and Procedures Manual 13,832.00 Total for Check Number 314102: 22,000.00
314103 MBFEC106 Marx Bros. Fire Extinguisher Co. 03/16/2022 S23072 Semi-annual inspection of range guard 2.5 gallon fire system 110.00 Total for Check Number 314103: 110.00
314104 MAT5563 Matt Chlor Inc 03/16/2022
26329 Emergency Sodium Hypochlorite Purchase 263.38
26556 Emergency Sodium Hypochlorite Purchase 143.40
26608 Emergency Sodium Hypochlorite Purchase 286.80
Total for Check Number 314104: 693.58
314105 MCAD1021 MCA Direct 03/16/2022
2022052 Municipal Election Assistance Consulting Package 1,315.94 Total for Check Number 314105: 1,315.94
314106 MMV9126 Mission Meridian Village POA 03/16/2022
331-103 - 01/22 MMV HOA Fees: 12/01/2021-01/20/2022 804.13 331-103 - 01/22 MMV HOA Fees: 12/01/2021-01/20/2022 1,730.17 331-103 - 02/22 MMV HOA Fees: 01/01/2022-02/16/2022 804.13 331-103 - 02/22 MMV HOA Fees: 01/01/2022-02/16/2022 1,730.17 Total for Check Number 314106: 5,068.60
314107 MVCH3011 MV Cheng & Associates Inc. 03/16/2022
01/31/2022 Professional Accounting Services: January 2022 1,306.25 Total for Check Number 314107: 1,306.25
314108 WOFL4011 National Auto Fleet Group 03/16/2022
PC96622 2021 Ford Interceptor 41,677.74
Total for Check Number 314108: 41,677.74
314109 OREI6711 O' Reilly Automotive Inc. 03/16/2022
3213-234205 Parks Division Veh. Unit # 209 Maint. & Eye safety supplies 351.35 3213-234205 Parks Division Veh. Unit # 209 Maint. & Eye safety supplies 21.12 Total for Check Number 314109: 372.47
314110 PAKH5011 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 03/16/2022
4010177162 Two Tires for Fire Engine E-81 385.83
Total for Check Number 314110: 385.83
314111 PSLSV802 Pasadena Live Scan Service 03/16/2022
914 Live Scans for Month of January 2022 350.00
Total for Check Number 314111: 350.00
314112 PHOE4610 Phoenix Group Information Systems 03/16/2022 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 9 8 - 17
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
012022184 Parking Citation Processing & Database Access: 01/2022 3,251.08 Total for Check Number 314112: 3,251.08
314113 PBGF8031 Pitney Bowes Global Financial Services LLC03/16/2022 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 2.05 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 6.16 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 4.11 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 102.66 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 51.33 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 7.19 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 123.19 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 41.06 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 10.27 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 4.11 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 10.27 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 513.31 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 20.53 3105347582 Lease Payment for Pitney Bowes Postage Machine: 12/30/21-3/29/22 71.86 Total for Check Number 314113: 968.10
314114 PSOMAS PSOMAS 03/16/2022
177099 General Plan & Downtown Specific Plan Update: 08/27/21-09/30/21 5,970.38 178019 General Plan & Downtown Specific Plan Update: 10/01/21-10/28/21 8,893.68 180887 General Plan & Downtown Specific Plan Update: 01/01/22-02/03/22 1,630.00 Total for Check Number 314114: 16,494.06
314115 RTPC5500 Regional TAP Service Center 03/16/2022
6015581 Metro 30 Day Senior Bus Pass subsidy payment for January 2022 180.00 Total for Check Number 314115: 180.00
314116 RlPU8540 Roadline Products Inc. USA 03/16/2022
17050 Street Division Safety Shirts with City Logo 1,012.10 Total for Check Number 314116: 1,012.10
314117 RBRTSONS Robertson's 03/16/2022
76043 Conrete for Citywide Street Projects-Sidwalk Repairs 1,595.11 Total for Check Number 314117: 1,595.11
314118 SGVE2011 San Gabriel Valley City Managers' Association03/16/2022 03/16/2022 March 16 2022 Meeting 105.00
Total for Check Number 314118: 105.00
314119 SGVMC111 San Gabriel Valley Medical Center 03/16/2022 883225 Blood draw for suspect 48.00
883827 Blood draw for suspect 48.00
Total for Check Number 314119: 96.00
314120 SAN8569 Sandler Brothers 03/16/2022
0234461-INV Water Division Knits to keep equipment clean 65.00 0234461-INV Water Division Knits to keep equipment clean 180.57 Total for Check Number 314120: 245.57
314121 SAEV2990 Sapphos Environmental Inc. 03/16/2022
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 10 8 - 18
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
1699025-01 710 Fair Oaks Historic Evaluation 1,419.75
1699026-01 23 Short Way Historic Evaluation 1,245.00
1699026-02 23 Short Way Historic Evaluation 278.75
Total for Check Number 314121: 2,943.50
314122 SCAT6710 Scott's Automotive 03/16/2022
16733 Public Works Facilities Unit# 30-Breaks, Oil & Filter 514.65 16749 Public Works Facilities Div. Unit 612 Oil Change and Maint. 55.28 16750 Public Works Street Unit 612-Light Replacement 359.90 16766 Public Works Facilities Unit 612 Body Mount Replacement 430.61 16777 Maintenance to Water Division Unit # 8 Door and Parking Break 100.32 16798 Oil change and replace brake pads for unit #1909 593.89 16804 Flush of Transmission Fluid PD Unit # 1501 150.70 16812 oil change unit #1405 86.63
16829 New thermostat and housing gasket unit # 1501 110.89 Total for Check Number 314122: 2,402.87
314123 SDSI0107 SDS Security Design Systems 03/16/2022
236148 Security System for Civic Center; lease 4/1/22-4/30/22 65.18 236149 Security System for Civic Center lease 4/1/22-4/30/22 217.46 236150 Security System for Civic Center; lease 4/1/22-4/30/22 113.00 236151 Security System for Civic Center; lease 4/1/22-4/30/22 30.00 Total for Check Number 314123: 425.64
314124 STON Seton 03/16/2022
9348776241 Flexible Delineators for Metro Grant 3,262.57 Total for Check Number 314124: 3,262.57
314125 SCOT8300 So Cal Office Technologies 03/16/2022
IN2485279 Black and Color Copies Service (11/18/21 - 02/17/22) 37.39 Total for Check Number 314125: 37.39
314126 SOGA6501 SoCalGAS 03/16/2022
1/1/2022-2/1/20 CNG fo City Vehicles (PWD & Transit) 139.00 1/1/2022-2/1/20 CNG fo City Vehicles (PWD & Transit) 138.99 1/1/2022-2/1/20 CNG fo City Vehicles (PWD & Transit) 139.00 1/1/2022-2/1/20 CNG fo City Vehicles (PWD & Transit) 139.00 1/1/2022-2/1/20 CNG fo City Vehicles (PWD & Transit) 139.00 1/1/2022-2/1/20 CNG fo City Vehicles (PWD & Transit) 139.00 Total for Check Number 314126: 833.99
314127 SCRR4010 Superior Court of California, County of LA 03/16/2022 January 2022 Monthly parking revenue distribution for January 2022 3,056.00 Total for Check Number 314127: 3,056.00
314128 CAPEACEO The California Peace Officers' Association 03/16/2022 286770 Police Department Membership: 1/1/22-12/31/22 1,150.00 Total for Check Number 314128: 1,150.00
314129 HODE8011 The Home Depot Pro (Formerly Supply Works) 03/16/2022 669013724 Foam Hand Sanitizer 196.86
Total for Check Number 314129: 196.86
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 11 8 - 19
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
314130 LEBE8032 The Skateside, LLC 03/16/2022
7765 Contract Class Instructor Payment Beginner Skateside 1,045.80 7766 Contract Class Instructor Payment Day Camp Skateside 612.50 7770 Contract Class Instructor Payment After School Skateside 1,675.80 Total for Check Number 314130: 3,334.10
314131 TAEV9224 Total Access Elevator Inc. 03/16/2022
77371 Elevator Preventative Maint.January 2022 335.37
77371 Elevator Preventative Maint.January 2022 400.01
77371 Elevator Preventative Maint.January 2022 335.37
78652 Elevator Preventative Maint.-February 2022 400.01 78652 Elevator Preventative Maint. February 2022 335.37 78652 Elevator Preventative Maint.-February 2022 335.37 80028 Elevator Preventative Maint.March 2022 335.37
80028 Elevator Preventative Maint.March 2022 400.00
80028 Elevator Preventative Maint.March 2022 335.38
Total for Check Number 314131: 3,212.25
314132 TTTC6710 TT Technologies, Inc. 03/16/2022
0228417 Emergency Repairs to Horizontal Boring Tool 872.17 Total for Check Number 314132: 872.17
314133 VALD4011 Catalina Valdez 03/16/2022
02/01/2022 Reimb. Training Mileage Expense for Officer Valdez: 02/01/22 3.51 Total for Check Number 314133: 3.51
314134 VERW6711 Verizon Wireless 03/16/2022
9899790628 Account # 842311063-00002 (01/18/22-02/17/22) 724.11 Total for Check Number 314134: 724.11
314135 EDVL6010 Edgar Villalobos 03/16/2022
1/22/2022 Clear Streets of Debris 1/22/2022 22.82
1/7/2022 Hope St. Meter Leak Call Out 1/7/2022 22.82
Total for Check Number 314135: 45.64
314136 GARWEBBR Gary Weber 03/16/2022
Planning283 Refund Withdrawn Application for 2059 La France 1,178.10 Total for Check Number 314136: 1,178.10
314137 WLHD8020 Westlake Hardware 03/16/2022
14302402 Fire Department Supplies 259.37
Total for Check Number 314137: 259.37
314138 WIT6353 Wittman Enterprises LLC 03/16/2022
2201059 Paramedic Billing Services: January 2022 5,969.21 Total for Check Number 314138: 5,969.21
314139 WON1111 Daren Wong 03/16/2022
02/01/2022 Reimb. Mileage Training Expense for Officer Wong: 02/01/22 3.51 Total for Check Number 314139: 3.51
314140 GRA1244 Woods Maintenance Services, Inc. 03/16/2022 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 12 8 - 20
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
SPAS0122 City Wide Graffiti Removal Services-January 2022 1,767.00 Total for Check Number 314140: 1,767.00
314141 XRXF5010 Xerox Financial Services 03/16/2022
3068626 Lease Copier AN 010-0061587-001 Service (02/10/22-03/09/22) 1,906.08 3090361 Lease Copier AN 010-0061587-002 Service (02/06/22 - 03/05/22) 275.05 Total for Check Number 314141: 2,181.13
Total for 3/16/2022: 1,325,835.95
Report Total (106 checks): 1,325,835.95
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (3/9/2022 4:18 PM) Page 13 8 - 21
ATTACHMENT 4
Supplemental ACH
Payments
8 - 22
Date Vendor Amount Description
2/16/2022 So Cal Edison $2,223.15 Online Payment for City's So Cal Edison Accounts.
2/17/2022 So Cal Edison $8,427.72 Online Payment for City's So Cal Edison Accounts.
2/24/2022 UMPQUA Bank $16,027.31
Online Payment for City's
January 2022 Credit Card
Expenses.
3/7/2022 So Cal Edison $66,471.87 Online Payment for City's So Cal Edison Accounts.

Total: $93,150.05
Supplemental ACH Payment Log
8 - 23
Date Description Amount

01.02.2022 Office Depot - Organizer for Fire Chief $167.00

01.02.2022 ExxonMobil - Fuel for Fire Chief Vehicle $45.93

01.03.2022 School Outfitters - Social Distancing Panels for Library Staff $1,094.69

01.03.2022 Chicago Books & Journals - 2022 Literary Calendars $26.45

01.04.2022 USPS - Stamps for Senior Center Newsletter $116.00

01.04.2022 So Cal Mobile Base - Fuel for Dial-a-Ride $81.74

01.04.2022 Rubberstamps.com - Cancelled Rubber Stamp for Library $20.29

01.04.2022 Day Translations - Redistricting $59.52

01.04-01.27.22 Chevron - Fuel for Motor Officers $317.94

01.05.2022 Uline - Wire Shelving & Bins for Library $316.04

01.06.2022 Chevron - Fuel for Fire Chief Vehicle $53.19

01.06.2022 Gotprint.com - Bookmarks for Library $163.25

01.06.2022 Day Translations - Redistricting $66.96

01.07.2022 Starbucks - Meeting Expense $13.65

01.08.2022 Community Development Monthly Zoom Fee $16.11

01.11.2022 Panera Bread - Meeting Expense $73.97

01.11.2022 Smart & Final - Camp Med Supplies $181.22

01.12.2022 Gus's BBQ - Meeting Expense $48.86

01.12.2022 Zoom for Police Department $161.13

01.12.2022 Day Translations - Redistricting $2,816.26

01.12.2022 Day Translations - Redistricting $40.00

01.13.2022 Gale's - Meeting Expense $122.94

01.13.2022 United Valet Parking - Parking $4.00

01.13.2022 Day Translations - Redistricting $148.58

01.13.2022 Day Translations - Redistricting $150.08

01.14.2022 Staples - Printing Services for Fire Dept. Annual Report $480.73

01.15.2022 Wayfair - Furniture at City Hall $1,014.28

01.16.2022 Crowdcast - Library Virtual Platform $10.00

01.18.2022 Allianz / Travel Insurance for Community Services Conference $103.15

01.18.2022 CA Parks and Recreation Conference $1,980.00

01.18.2022 Day Translations - Credit Memo ($2,816.26)

01.19.2022 Plaque for Memorial Bench $56.26

01.19.2022 Day Translations - Redistricting $50.66

01.20.2022 SCPMA-HR - HR membership $50.00

01.20.2022 SCPMA-HR - HR membership $50.00

01.20.2022 SCPMA-HR - HR membership $50.00

01.21.2022 Sun Badge Company - Badge for K9 Delta $141.65

01.25.2022 Cal Cities Refund ($650.00)

01.25.2022 Grocery Outlet - Camp Snacks $118.36

01.25.2022 Whentowork Inc. - Library Staff Scheduling Software $88.00

01.26.2022 Medek Health COVID-19 Test Kits $5,474.00

01.26.2022 Municipal Management Associations - Membership $90.00

01.26.2022 PayPal SCPLRC Conference $200.00

01.27.2022 Carpet Cleaning for Fire Department $2,838.15

01.28.2022 Costco - Microwave for Fire Department $242.53

01.29.2022 Facebook - Ads $75.00

01.30.2022 Facebook - Ads $75.00
Total: $16,027.31
January 2022 Credit Card Expense Summary
8 - 24
ATTACHMENT 5
Prepaid &Warrant Voids
8 - 25
Accounts Payable
ealvarez
Printed: 03/03/2022 - 4:13PM
User:

Void Check Proof List
Batch: 00002.03.2022
Account Number Amount Invoice No Inv Date Description Reference Task Label Type PONumber Close PO? Line Item Vendor: BFWB4011 Badge Frame, Inc.

Check No: 0 Check Date: 03/02/2022
465.48 38711 02/16/2022 Retirement Plaques for Lunnon, Giron, and Ankri 4345 No 1 101-4010-4011-8020-000
Check Total: 465.48
Vendor Total: 465.48
Report Total: 465.48
AP-Void Check Proof List (3/3/2022 - 4:13 PM) Page 1
8 - 26
Accounts Payable
ealvarez
Printed: 03/03/2022 - 12:52PM
User:

Void Check Proof List
Batch: 00001.03.2022
Account Number Amount Invoice No Inv Date Description Reference Task Label Type PONumber Close PO? Line Item Vendor: KVMC6710 Kelvin Machado
Check No: 313803 Check Date: 01/20/2022

18.25 10/24/2021 10/24/2021 2021 Mileage Reimbursement for Call Out - 10/24/2021 No 0 500-6010-6710-8070-000

18.25 11/12/2021 11/12/2021 2021 Mileage Reimbursement for Call Out - 11/12/2021 No 0 500-6010-6710-8070-000

18.25 11/14/2021 11/14/2021 2021 Mileage Reimbursement for Call Out - 11/14/2021 No 0 500-6010-6710-8070-000

18.25 11/13/2021 11/13/2021 2021 Mileage Reimbursement for Call Out - 11/13/2021 No 0 500-6010-6710-8070-000
Check Total: 73.00
Vendor Total: 73.00
Report Total: 73.00
AP-Void Check Proof List (3/3/2022 - 12:52 PM) Page 1
8 - 27
Accounts Payable
ealvarez
Printed: 03/07/2022 - 10:36AM
User:

Void Check Proof List
Batch: 00003.03.2022
Account Number Amount Invoice No Inv Date Description Reference Task Label Type PONumber Close PO? Line Item Vendor: CPO4011 California Police Officers Association
Check No: 313991 Check Date: 03/02/2022
1,150.00 286770 09/16/2021 Police Department Membership: 1/1/22-12/31/22 4364 No 1 101-4010-4011-8060-000
Check Total: 1,150.00
Vendor Total: 1,150.00
Report Total: 1,150.00
AP-Void Check Proof List (3/7/2022 - 10:36 AM) Page 1
8 - 28
ATTACHMENT 6
Payroll Summary
8 - 29
Payroll
Payroll Summary Report
Payroll Date: 3/4/2022 Regular
Checks $ 6,490.85
Direct Deposits $ 458,903.85
IRS Payments $ 99,410.36
EDD - State of CA $ 28,963.49
PERS Pension $ 238,542.68
Deferred Comp $ 24,947.29
PERS Health $ 181,153.46
Subtotal: $ 1,038,411.98
Grand Total: $ 1,038,411.98
8 - 30
9 - 1
9 Monthly Investment Report for January 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

Commission Review and Recommendation
The Finance Commission approves the Annual Investment Policy and ensures that all investments are in compliance.

Attachment: City Investment Report for January 2022
9 - 2
ATTACHMENT 1
City Investment Report for January 2022
9 - 3

PERCENT CURRENT

INSTITUTION MATURITY CURRENT OF MARKET
NAME DATE YIELD PORTFOLIO COST VALUE *
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND:

LAIF City ON DEMAND 0.234% 70.33% 40,059,892.55 40,059,892.55 SUBTOTAL 70.33% 40,059,892.55 40,059,892.55

ZIONS BANK
Corporate Bonds See Exhibit B-1 2.66% 8.68% 4,943,726.12 4,841,867.40 Government Agency Securities See Exhibit B-1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 US Treasury Notes & Bonds See Exhibit B-1 1.16% 20.29% 11,555,718.73 11,433,007.79 US Obligations Variable See Exhibit B-1 0.12% 0.70% 399,992.40 400,520.80 SUBTOTAL 29.67% 16,899,437.25 16,675,395.99
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 100.00% $56,959,329.80 $56,735,288.54 BANK ACCOUNTS:

Bank of the West Account Balance: $5,072,640.55
Zions Bank Uninvested Cash Balance1
: $817,377.64
Zions Bank Unsettled Transactions1 -
BNY Mellon Uninvested Cash Balance2 158,308.11
Footnotes:
2 The BNY Mellon Uninvested Cash Balance is information-only as it is funds intended for 2016 Water Revenue Bond.

Required Disclosures:

Average weighted maturity of the portfolio 271 DAYS
Average weighted total yield to maturity of the portfolio 0.626% Projected Expenditures for the next 6 months:

Projected with Prior Year Same Period:

Projected with FY 2022 Adopted Budget:

January 31, 2022
Exhibit A
City of South Pasadena

INVESTMENT REPORT
1 The Zions Bank Uninvested Cash Balance and Unsetteled Transactions are separate from the investment portion. The sum of the three Zions Bank balance totals to the balance reflected on the provided statement. $ 22,656,817
$ 29,986,130
* Current market valuation is required for investments with maturities of more than twelve months.

In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, as the City Treasurer of the City of South Pasadena, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months and that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy.

I also certify that this report reflects all Government Agency pooled investments and all City's bank balances.

Investment Balances at Month End
Gary Pia, City Treasurer Date
03/03/2022
9 - 4
Statement of Account
January 1, 2022 Through January 31, 2022
South Pasadena Custody
1414 Mission Street
South Pasadena, CA 91030
City of South Pasadena
Exhibit B-1
9 - 5
Cash Reconciliation
Income Principal
Receipts
Disbursements
Sales
Interest
Dividends
Other Receipts
Collective Fund Earnings
Transfers

0.00 172,000.00
28,413.34 0.00

1.28 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Purchases
Fees
Other Disbursements
Transfers

0.00 -87,954.39

0.00 0.00

0.00 -10,612.44

0.00 0.00
Total Receipts 28,414.62 172,000.00
Total Disbursements 0.00 -98,566.83
Net Cash Management 0.00 -101,847.79
Opening Balance January 1, 2022 $ 343,001.30 $ -343,001.30 Closing Balance January 31, 2022 $ 371,415.92 $ -371,415.92 January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Cash Reconciliation (2 col) - SUMCTB1 Page 2
9 - 6
Portfolio
Portfolio Summary
Market Projected Current
% Value Income Yield
January 31, 2022
Cash & Equivalents 4.67% 817,377.64 81.74 0.01%
Fixed Income 95.33% 16,675,395.99 261,521.75 1.57%
Accrued Income
Total Portfolio
Total Market Value
100.00 % 17,492,773.63 261,603.49 1.50%
58,322.02
17,551,095.65
January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Port Sum and Hold w Accruals - ACRHLD Page 3
9 - 7
January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Holdings
Shares / PV Asset Description Cost Price Market Est Ann Inc Yield Acc Income Money Market Funds - Taxable
817,377.64 Fidelity Gov Port III FCGXX 817,377.64 1.00 817,377.64 81.74 0.01% 5.55 817,377.64 * * Sub Totals * * 817,377.64 817,377.64 81.74 0.01% 5.55 Corporate Bonds (30/360)
170,000 Apple Inc 2.700% 05/13/2022 171,786.97 100.57 170,973.50 4,590.00 2.68% 987.23 170,000 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.000% 08/01/2022 170,502.37 100.67 171,136.41 3,400.00 1.99% 1,700.00 87,000 Visa Inc 2.150% 09/15/2022 87,954.39 100.82 87,710.54 1,870.50 2.13% 705.36 167,000 Lockheed Martin Corp 3.100% 01/15/2023 173,677.68 101.71 169,859.17 5,177.00 3.05% 216.91 168,000 Bank of New York Mellon 2.950% 01/29/2023 166,503.12 101.87 171,142.51 4,956.00 2.90% 13.84 125,000 Amazon Com Inc 2.400% 02/22/2023 123,210.00 101.41 126,763.96 3,000.00 2.37% 1,324.02 163,000 General Dynamics Corp 3.375% 05/15/2023 164,599.95 102.70 167,408.10 5,501.25 3.29% 1,152.50 84,000 Cisco Systems Inc 2.200% 09/20/2023 81,882.36 101.58 85,330.49 1,848.00 2.17% 671.06 165,000 Deere John Capital Corp 3.650% 10/12/2023 169,418.28 103.98 171,564.99 6,022.50 3.51% 1,816.84 160,000 State Street Corp 3.700% 11/20/2023 171,652.92 104.15 166,645.87 5,920.00 3.55% 1,157.54 160,000 Caterpillar Finl Svcs 3.750% 11/24/2023 171,264.18 104.33 166,920.63 6,000.00 3.59% 1,106.15 203,000 Truist Finl Corp 3.750% 12/06/2023 212,010.71 104.09 211,295.48 7,612.50 3.60% 1,148.25 80,000 MetLife Inc 3.600% 04/10/2024 84,162.84 104.40 83,523.81 2,880.00 3.45% 884.92 163,000 Comcast Corp New 3.700% 04/15/2024 174,127.48 104.31 170,024.72 6,031.00 3.55% 1,768.87 166,000 Texas Instrs Inc 2.625% 05/15/2024 169,439.74 102.51 170,162.54 4,357.50 2.56% 912.88 84,000 Paccar Financial Corp 2.150% 08/15/2024 88,918.20 101.30 85,094.39 1,806.00 2.12% 832.37 206,000 Unitedhealth Group Inc 2.375% 08/15/2024 219,958.43 101.97 210,057.61 4,892.50 2.33% 2,254.92 84,000 United Parcel Svcs Inc 2.200% 09/01/2024 85,232.61 101.82 85,530.06 1,848.00 2.16% 769.14 172,000 Coca Cola Co 1.750% 09/06/2024 176,934.68 100.75 173,295.88 3,010.00 1.74% 1,210.73 211,000 PNC Finl Svcs Group Inc 2.200% 11/01/2024 215,979.57 101.49 214,144.96 4,642.00 2.17% 1,154.02 166,000 Pepsico Inc 2.250% 03/19/2025 177,664.82 101.63 168,710.29 3,735.00 2.21% 1,366.72 169,000 Target Corp 2.250% 04/15/2025 178,401.47 101.47 171,477.33 3,802.50 2.22% 1,115.26 173,000 US Bancorp 1.450% 05/12/2025 178,575.79 98.85 171,007.64 2,508.50 1.47% 546.54 280,000 JPMorgan CHASE & CO 3.900% 07/15/2025 308,506.80 106.14 297,195.09 10,920.00 3.67% 457.54 Port Sum and Hold w Accruals - ACRHLD Page 4
9 - 8
January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Holdings
Shares / PV Asset Description Cost Price Market Est Ann Inc Yield Acc Income 195,000 Bank Of America Corp 3.875% 08/01/2025 221,628.03 106.51 207,693.06 7,556.25 3.64% 3,778.13 158,000 Home Depot Inc 3.350% 09/15/2025 177,930.91 105.26 166,304.51 5,293.00 3.18% 1,995.96 87,000 Prudential Finl Inc 1.500% 03/10/2026 88,725.21 98.49 85,688.21 1,305.00 1.52% 510.34 178,000 Procter & Gamble Co 1.000% 04/23/2026 177,521.18 97.02 172,689.05 1,780.00 1.03% 482.29 178,000 Schwab Charles Corp 1.150% 05/13/2026 178,776.08 96.85 172,398.82 2,047.00 1.19% 440.28 165,000 Intel Corp 2.600% 05/19/2026 176,779.35 103.10 170,117.78 4,290.00 2.52% 850.81 4,737,000 * * Sub Totals * * 4,943,726.12 4,841,867.40 128,602.00 2.66% 33,331.42 U.S. Treasury Notes & Bonds
885,000 U S Treasury Notes 1.750% 07/15/2022 888,242.61 100.59 890,255.13 15,487.50 1.74% 684.53 828,000 US Treasury Nts 1.750% 01/31/2023 829,574.18 100.94 835,762.50 14,490.00 1.73% 0.00 956,000 US Treasury Note 1.375% 06/30/2023 956,287.01 100.56 961,377.50 13,145.00 1.37% 1,125.68 534,000 U S Treasury Notes 0.250% 09/30/2023 532,185.47 98.68 526,928.77 1,335.00 0.25% 451.11 755,000 U S Treasury Notes 2.875% 11/30/2023 781,535.95 103.16 778,859.51 21,706.25 2.79% 3,697.22 719,000 U.S. Treasury Notes 2.125% 03/31/2024 713,017.92 101.92 732,818.46 15,278.75 2.08% 5,162.87 1,020,000 US Treasury N/B 2.000% 04/30/2024 1,029,538.00 101.71 1,037,490.96 20,400.00 1.97% 5,184.53 980,000 U S Treasury Notes 0.625% 10/15/2024 976,592.54 98.15 961,892.54 6,125.00 0.64% 1,817.31 894,000 U S Treasury Notes 0.500% 03/31/2025 896,517.16 97.20 868,960.85 4,470.00 0.51% 1,510.47 850,000 U S Treasury Notes 0.250% 06/30/2025 834,328.55 96.00 816,033.15 2,125.00 0.26% 181.98 750,000 U S Treasury Notes 0.375% 11/30/2025 732,333.75 95.73 717,978.75 2,812.50 0.39% 479.05 772,000 U S Treasury Notes 0.375% 01/31/2026 766,394.94 95.46 736,928.04 2,895.00 0.39% 0.00 725,000 U S Treasury Notes 0.750% 03/31/2026 721,912.95 96.73 701,296.13 5,437.50 0.78% 1,837.40 900,000 U S Treasury Notes 0.750% 08/31/2026 897,257.70 96.27 866,425.50 6,750.00 0.78% 2,852.90 11,568,000 * * Sub Totals * * 11,555,718.73 11,433,007.79 132,457.50 1.16% 24,985.05 U.S. Obligations Variable
400,000 U S Treasury Nts Frn 0.116% 10/31/2023 399,992.40 100.13 400,520.80 462.25 0.12% 0.00 400,000 * * Sub Totals * * 399,992.40 400,520.80 462.25 0.12% 0.00 Port Sum and Hold w Accruals - ACRHLD Page 5
9 - 9
January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Holdings
Shares / PV Asset Description Cost Price Market Est Ann Inc Yield Acc Income * * Grand Totals * * 17,716,814.89 17,492,773.63 261,603.49 1.50% Cash Summary
17,522,377.64 58,322.02
-371,415.92
371,415.92

0.00 Principal Cash
Income Cash
Invested Income
Port Sum and Hold w Accruals - ACRHLD Page 6
9 - 10
Account Transactions
Date Description Income Principal Carrying Value
Starting Balances $ 343,001.30 $ -343,001.30 $ 18,000,925.53 Interest
01/06/2022 Purchase Accrued Interest -576.74
Visa Inc 2.1500% 09/15/22
01/18/2022 Interest 5,460.00
JPMorgan CHASE & CO 3.9000% 07/15/25
01/18/2022 Interest 2,588.50
Lockheed Martin Corp 3.1000% 01/15/23
01/18/2022 Interest 7,743.75
U S Treasury Notes 1.7500% 07/15/22
01/31/2022 Interest 2,478.00
Bank of New York Mellon 2.9500% 01/29/23
01/31/2022 Interest 7,245.00
US Treasury Nts 1.7500% 01/31/23
01/31/2022 Interest 1,447.50
U S Treasury Notes 0.3750% 01/31/26
01/31/2022 Call Bond - Interest 1,909.20
American Express Cr Corp 2.7000% 03/03/22
01/31/2022 Interest 118.13
U S Treasury Nts Frn 0.1156% 10/31/23
Sub Total 28,413.34 0.00 0.00
Dividends
01/03/2022 Dividend 1.28
Fidelity Gov Port III FCGXX
Interest From 12/01/2021 To 12/31/2021
Sub Total 1.28 0.00 0.00
Buys
01/06/2022 Buy -87,954.39 87,954.39
Visa Inc 2.1500% 09/15/22
87000 Par Val @ $101.097
Sub Total 0.00 -87,954.39 87,954.39
January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Transactions (3 col) - TRNTNT8 Page 7
9 - 11
January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Account Transactions
Date Description Income Principal Carrying Value
Sells
01/31/2022 Call Bond 172,000.00 -176,339.94
American Express Cr Corp 2.7000% 03/03/22
Sold 172000 Par Val @ $100.00
Cost Basis Removed $173,464.69
Long Term Gain/Loss : $-1,464.69
Sub Total 0.00 172,000.00 -176,339.94
Disbursements
01/21/2022 Cash Disbursement -1,504.46
Miscellaneous Disbursement
Paid To : Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Per Sec 9 of Custody Agmt Inv#10823022018 dtd 01-18-22 Acct#255-138705 01/28/2022 Cash Disbursement -7,497.98
Miscellaneous Disbursement
Paid To : Legg Mason Private Portfolio Group, LLC
Per Sec. 9 of the Custody Agreement-Management Fee Invoice dtd 01-24-22 01/31/2022 Cash Disbursement -770.00
Fee Paid To Bank - CC
Paid To : Zions Bank
Custodial Services Quarterly Administration Fee $770 (July 2021 - September 2021) Per Sec. 9 of The Agreement Custody Services Quarterly Administration Fee $500 Security Purchase $120 Security Sale $60 Wire Transfer $90 Invoice No. 10240 Dated 10/01/21. 01/31/2022 Cash Disbursement -840.00
Fee Paid To Bank - CC
Paid To : Zions Bank
Custodial Services Quarterly Administration Fee $840 (October 2021 - December 2021) Per Sec. 9 of The Agreement Custody Services Quarterly Administration Fee $500 Security Purchase $160 Security Sale $120 Wire Transfer $60 Invoice No. 10241 Dated 01/31/22.

Sub Total 0.00 -10,612.44 0.00
Other/Miscellaneous
01/31/2022 Explanation
Market Fee received in the amount of $500.00. Per invoice dated 09/30/2021. 01/31/2022 Explanation
Market Fee received in the amount of $500.00. Per invoice dated 12/31/2021.

Transactions (3 col) - TRNTNT8 Page 8
9 - 12
January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Account Transactions
Date Description Income Principal Carrying Value
01/31/2022 Explanation
Miscellaneous Fee received in the amount of $270.00. Per invoice dated 01/31/2022. 01/31/2022 Explanation
Miscellaneous Fee received in the amount of $340.00. Per invoice dated 01/31/2022.

Sub Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cash Management
01/03/2022 Sweep - Buy -1.28 1.28
Fidelity Gov Port III FCGXX

1.28 Par Val @ $1.00
01/06/2022 Sweep - Sell 88,531.13 -88,531.13
Fidelity Gov Port III FCGXX
Sold 88531.13 Par Val @ $1.00
01/18/2022 Sweep - Buy -15,792.25 15,792.25
Fidelity Gov Port III FCGXX
15792.25 Par Val @ $1.00
01/21/2022 Sweep - Sell 1,504.46 -1,504.46
Fidelity Gov Port III FCGXX
Sold 1504.46 Par Val @ $1.00
01/28/2022 Sweep - Sell 7,497.98 -7,497.98
Fidelity Gov Port III FCGXX
Sold 7497.98 Par Val @ $1.00
01/31/2022 Sweep - Buy -183,587.83 183,587.83
Fidelity Gov Port III FCGXX
183587.83 Par Val @ $1.00
Sub Total 0.00 -101,847.79 101,847.79
Ending Balances $ 371,415.92 $ -371,415.92 $ 18,014,387.77 Transactions (3 col) - TRNTNT8 Page 9
9 - 13
Corporate Trust Services provided by Zions Bancorporation, N.A.

Statement Disclosures & Other Important Information
Please review your statement promptly and report any discrepancies immediately to your account administrator listed on the first page.

Market value information (including accrued income) furnished herein has been obtained from sources that Zions Bancorporation, N.A. believes to be reliable. Zions Bancorporation, N.A. makes no representation, warranty or guarantee, express or implied, that any quoted value necessarily reflects the proceeds that may be received on the sale of a security or asset. Securities and asset prices may vary from actual liquidation value and should only be used as general guide to portfolio value. Prices are received from various pricing services. However, pricing services are sometimes unable to provide timely information. Where pricing sources are not readily available, particularly on certain debt securities, estimated prices may be generated by a matrix system taking various factors into consideration.

Securities, including mutual funds, are not bank deposits and are not FDIC insured, nor are they obligations of or guaranteed by Zions Bancorporation, N.A., its affiliates or of any federal or state government or government sponsored agency. Securities, including mutual funds, involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.

January 01, 2022 through January 31, 2022
Account Name : South Pasadena Custody
Statement Letter Page 10
9 - 14
2016 Water Revenue Bonds
Investment Issuer Settlement Par Value Coupon Market Value Current Maturity Days to CUSIP Type Date Rate YTM Date Maturity Account Number
BNY Mellon Project Fund
1 Cash 0.46 0.010% 0.46 0.010% 12 Morgan Stanley Treasury Portfolio 158,307.65 0.250% 158,291.81 0.250% 1 Subtotal Cash & Cash Equivalents 0.41% 158,308.11 0.250% 158,292.27 0.250% 1Total Project Fund 158,308.11 0.250% 158,292.27 0.250% 1 Funds and Investments
Exhibit B-2
January 31, 2022
Held by Contracted (Third) Parties
9 - 15
MONTH FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 JULY 14,003,563 17,332,153 20,958,651 26,306,572 28,541,631 74,033,803 33,187,829 34,119,395 39,309,559 47,220,730 AUGUST 13,043,563 17,330,985 12,658,088 26,294,151 28,405,544 73,122,925 31,258,493 34,245,197 35,205,219 47,188,874 SEPTEMBER 11,783,420 16,331,557 19,715,369 22,058,959 27,049,892 70,952,657 31,219,168 34,211,588 35,108,138 50,651,612 OCTOBER 11,795,960 13,841,158 17,221,779 22,325,114 27,023,005 70,917,973 26,989,542 30,424,551 32,530,753 47,647,956 NOVEMBER 11,800,260 13,836,635 17,221,849 22,287,418 73,246,265 26,547,176 26,916,772 30,394,571 36,836,391 47,638,933 DECEMBER 11,805,140 16,837,192 20,603,990 22,253,300 71,499,585 28,949,643 27,028,835 30,398,333 36,824,546 51,976,067 JANUARY 11,816,031 18,846,359 26,309,319 27,399,997 71,229,735 32,878,042 35,305,506 30,183,446 43,433,939 56,735,289 FEBRUARY 13,818,580 18,845,663 26,260,788 30,108,605 71,084,575 33,013,420 34,571,287 35,784,459 43,636,405 MARCH 13,319,038 13,145,894 26,315,158 28,939,924 72,604,964 32,833,141 32,568,840 35,894,036 43,608,698 APRIL 17,327,604 13,153,853 26,326,876 28,276,276 75,018,330 33,064,100 32,242,202 36,081,161 42,158,002 MAY 19,327,983 23,452,878 26,310,240 28,429,928 76,053,277 32,879,674 36,925,478 34,133,626 42,180,215 JUNE 19,323,510 22,452,628 29,289,712 26,594,581 75,918,587 33,102,349 38,922,757 34,218,755 42,164,581 January 31, 2022
Exhibit C
Investment Report
Summary of Invested Funds -- Last Day of the Month
9 - 16
10 - 1
10 Selection of OPEB Trustee
March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 3 ends

assets under management, fee schedule, and annualized returns. Fees associated with a trust go towards management fees, administrative costs, and custodial services.

The quotes received were based on an initial $1,215,000 deposit and were as follows:

Name Fee Est. Cost
CalPERS-CERBT – California Employers’ Retiree Benefit
Trust 10 bpm $1,215
PARS - Public Agency Retirement Services 60 bpm $7,290
Keenan Financial Services 60 bpm $7,290
Public Financial Management* - -
*did not submit quote

Staff is recommending the CalPERS-CERBT entity based on the following:
• Lowest annual cost;
• Usage of CalPERS Investment Division;
• Non-profit based;
• CalPERS top 3 investors in California;
• Ability to generate larger returns through diversity of investment (Attachment 3); • Consistent low-cost model;
• Largest Section 115 trust provider with $17 billion in assets; and • Over 600 unique employer contracts.

YEAR 1
Fee Rate in Basis Points (bps) and Annual Costs on Assets Under Management (AUM)
AUM 10bps 20bps 25bps 30bps 60bps
$1M $1K $2K $2.5K $3K $6K
$10M $10K $20K $25K $30K $60K
$34M $34K $68K $85K $102K $204K
$55M $55K $110K $137.5K $165K $330K
$89M $89K $178K $222.5K $267K $534K
YEAR 10
Fee Rate in Basis Points (bps) and Decade Costs on Assets Under Management (AUM)
AUM 10bps 20bps 25bps 30bps 60bps
$1M $10K $20K $25K $30K $60K
$10M $100K $200K $250K $300K $600K
$34M $340K $680K $850K $1.02M $2.04M
$55M $550K $1.10M $1.375M $1.65M $2.30M
$89M $890K $1.78M $2.225M $2.67M $5.34M
10 - 2
Selection of OPEB Trustee
March 16, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

CERBT Fee Rate History:

Fiscal Year Fee Rate in Basis Points
2007-08 2.00
2008-09 6.00
2009-10 9.00
2010-11 12.00
2011-12 12.00
2012-13 15.00
2013-14 13.00
2014-15 10.00
2015-16 10.00
2016-17 10.00
2017-18 10.00
2018-19 10.00
2019-20 10.00
2020-21 10.00
2021-22 10.00
Fiscal Impact
There will be no immediate fiscal impact caused by the creation and implementation of a Section 115 Trust. However, using these Designated Reserves will responsibly provide for future OPEB costs and provide a degree of security for future cash flows.

Commission Review and Recommendation
The Finance Commission has reviewed the various proposals and is supporting staff’s recommendation to select CalPERS – CERBT as the new trustee.

Attachments:

1. Resolution to participate in OPEB prefunding plan with CalPERS-CERBT

2. Resolution to Delegate Authority to Request Disbursements

3. CalPERS Long-term Returns
10 - 3
ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution to participate in
OPEB prefunding plan
with CalPERS-CERBT
10 - 4

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING AN AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE

PREFUNDING PLAN FOR OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT

BENEFITS (OPEB) THROUGH CALPERS - CERBT
WHEREAS, (1) Government Code Section 22940 establishes in the State Treasury the Annuitants' Health Care Coverage Fund for the prefunding of health care coverage for annuitants (Prefunding Plan); and
WHEREAS, (2) The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) Board of Administration (Board) has sole and exclusive control and power over the administration and investment of the Prefunding Plan (sometimes also referred to as CERBT), the purposes of which include, but are not limited to (i) receiving contributions from participating employers and establishing separate Employer Prefunding Accounts in the Prefunding Plan for the performance of an essential governmental function (ii) investing contributed amounts and income thereon, if any, in order to receive yield on the funds and (iii) disbursing contributed amounts and income thereon, if any, to pay for costs of administration of the Prefunding Plan and to pay for health care costs or other post-employment benefits in accordance with the terms of participating employers' plans; and WHEREAS, (3) the City of South Pasadena (Employer) desires to participate in the Prefunding Plan upon the terms and conditions set by the Board and as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, (4) Employer may participate in the Prefunding Plan upon (i) approval by the Board and (ii) filing a duly adopted and executed Agreement and Election toPrefund Other Post-Employment Benefits (Agreement) as provided in the terms and conditions of the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, (5) The Prefunding Plan is a trust fund that is intended to perform an essential governmental function within the meaning of Section 115 of the Internal Revenue Code as an agent multiple-employer defined benefit plan as defined in Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statements for Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans (OPEB Standards) consisting of an aggregation of single-employer plans, with pooled administrative and investment functions.
10 - 5

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.

A. Representation and Warranty
Employer represents and warrants that it is a political subdivision of the State of California or an entity whose income is excluded from gross income under Section 115
(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.

SECTION 2.

B. Adoption and Approval of the Agreement; Effective Date; Amendment (1) Employer's governing body shall elect to participate in the Prefunding Plan by adopting this Agreement and filing with the CalPERS Board a true and correctoriginal or certified copy of this Agreement as follows:

Filing by mail, send to: CalPERS

CERBT (OPEB)
P.O. Box 1494
Sacramento, CA 95812-1494
Filing in person, deliver to:

CalPERS
Mailroom
CERBT
(OPEB)
400 Q Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
(2) Upon receipt of the executed Agreement, and after approval by the Board, the Board shall fix an effective date and shall promptly notify Employer of the effectivedate of the Agreement.
(3) The terms of this Agreement may be amended only in writing upon the agreement of both CalPERS and Employer, except as otherwise provided herein.

Any such amendment or modification to this Agreement shall be adopted and executed in the same manner as required for the Agreement. Upon receipt of the executed amendment or modification, the Board shall fix the effective date of the amendment ormodification.
(4) The Board shall institute such procedures and processes as it deems necessary to administer the Prefunding Plan, to carry out the purposes of this Agreement, and to maintain the tax-exempt status of the Prefunding Plan.

Employer agrees to follow such procedures and processes. 10 - 6
SECTION 3.

C. Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Cost Reports and Employer Contributions
(1) Employer shall provide to the Board an OPEB cost report on the basis of the actuarial assumptions and methods prescribed by the Board. Such report shall be for the Board’s use in financial reporting, and shall be prepared at least as often as the minimum frequency required by applicable GASB OPEB Standards. This OPEB cost report may be prepared as an actuarial valuation report or, if the employer is qualified under GASB OPEB Standards, may be prepared as an Alternative Measurement Method (AMM) report. (a) Unless qualified under GASB OPEB Standards, to provide an AMM report, Employer shall provide to the Board an actuarial valuation report. Such report shall be for the Board's use in financial reporting, and shall be prepared at least as often as the minimum frequency required by GASB OPEB Standards, and shall be:
1) prepared and signed by a Fellow or Associate of the Society of Actuaries who is also a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries or a person with equivalent qualifications acceptable tothe Board;
2) prepared in accordance with generally accepted actuarial practice and GASB OPEB Standards; and,
3) provided to the Board prior to the Board's acceptance of contributions for the valuation period or as otherwise required by the Board.
(b) If qualified under GASB OPEB Standards, Employer may provide to the Board an AMM report. Such report shall be for the Board’s use in financial reporting, shall be prepared at least as often as the minimum frequency required by GASB OPEB Standards, and shall be:
1) affirmed by Employer’s external auditor, or by a Fellow or Associate of the Society of Actuaries who is also a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries or a person with
equivalent qualifications acceptable to the Board, to be consistent with the AMM process described in GASB OPEB
Standards;
2) prepared in accordance with GASB OPEB Standards; and, 10 - 7
3) provided to the Board prior to the Board's acceptance of contributions for the valuation period or as otherwise
required by the Board.
(2) The Board may reject any OPEB cost report for financial reporting purposes submitted to it, but shall not unreasonably do so. In the event that theBoard determines, in its sole discretion, that the OPEB cost report is not suitable for use in the Board's financial statements or if Employer fails to provide a required OPEB cost report, the Board may obtain, at Employer's expense, an OPEB cost report that meets the Board’s financial reporting needs. The Board may recover from Employer the cost of obtaining such OPEB cost report by billing and collecting from Employer or by deducting the amount from Employer's account in the Prefunding Plan.
(3) Employer shall notify the Board of the amount and time of contributions which contributions shall be made in the manner established by the Board. (4) Employer contributions to the Prefunding Plan may be limited to the amount necessary to fully fund Employer's actuarial present value of total projected benefits, as supported by the OPEB cost report for financial reporting purposes acceptable to the Board. As used throughout this document, the meaning of the term "actuarial present value of total projected benefits" is as defined in GASB OPEB Standards. If Employer’s contribution causes its assets in the Prefunding Plan to exceed the amount required to fully fund the actuarial present value of total projected benefits, the Board may refuse to accept the contribution. (5) No contributions are required. Contributions can be made at any time following the effective date of the Agreement provided that Employer has first complied with the requirements of Paragraph C.

SECTION 4.

D. Administration of Accounts, Investments, Allocation of Income (1) The Board has established the Prefunding Plan as an agent plan consisting of an aggregation of single-employer plans, with pooled administrative and investment functions, under the terms of which separate accounts are maintained for each employer so that the Employer's assets will provide benefits only under the Employer's post-employment benefit plan(s). (2) All Employer contributions and assets attributable to Employer contributions shallbe separately accounted for in the Prefunding Plan (Employer’s Prefunding Account).
(3) Employer’s Prefunding Account assets may be aggregated with prefunding 10 - 8
account assets of other employers and may be co-invested by the Board in any asset classes appropriate for a Section 115 Trust.
(4) The Board may deduct the costs of administration of the Prefunding Plan fromthe investment income or Employer’s Prefunding Account in a manner determined by the Board.
(5) Investment income shall be allocated among participating employers and posted to Employer’s Prefunding Account as determined by the Board but no less frequentlythan annually.
(6) If Employer's assets in the Prefunding Plan exceed the amount required to fullyfund the actuarial present value of total projected benefits, the Board, in compliance with applicable accounting and legal requirements, may return such excess to Employer.

SECTION 5.

E. Reports and Statements
(1) Employer shall submit with each contribution a contribution report in the form and containing the information prescribed by the Board. (2) The Board shall prepare and provide a statement of Employer’s Prefunding Account at least annually reflecting the balance in Employer's Prefunding Account, contributions made during the period and income allocated during the period, and such other information as the Board determines.

SECTION 6.

F. Disbursements
(1) Employer may receive disbursements not to exceed the annual premium and other costs of post-employment healthcare benefits and other post-employment benefits as defined in GASB OPEB Standards.
(2) Employer shall notify CalPERS in writing in the manner specified by CalPERS of the persons authorized to request disbursements from the Prefunding Plan on behalf of Employer.
(3) Employer's request for disbursement shall be in writing signed by Employer's authorized representative, in accordance with procedures established by the Board. The Board may require that Employer certify or otherwise establish that the monieswill be used for the purposes of the Prefunding Plan. (4) Requests for disbursements that satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) will be processed monthly.
10 - 9
(5) CalPERS shall not be liable for amounts disbursed in error if it has acted upon the written instruction of an individual authorized by Employer to request disbursements. In the event of any other erroneous disbursement, the extent of CalPERS' liability shall be the actual dollar amount of the disbursement, plus interest at the actual earnings rate but not less than zero. (6) No disbursement shall be made from the Prefunding Plan which exceedsthe balance in Employer’s Prefunding Account.

SECTION 7.

G. Costs of Administration
Employer shall pay its share of the costs of administration of the Prefunding Plan, as determined by the Board.

ECTION 8.

H. Termination of Employer Participation in Prefunding Plan (1) The Board may terminate Employer’s participation in the Prefunding Plan if:
(a) Employer gives written notice to the Board of its election to terminate; (b) The Board finds that Employer fails to satisfy the terms and conditions of this Agreement or of the Board's rules or regulations. (2) If Employer’s participation in the Prefunding Plan terminates for any of the foregoing reasons, all assets in Employer’s Prefunding Account shall remain in the Prefunding Plan, except as otherwise provided below, and shall continue to be invested and accrue income as provided in Paragraph D.
(3) After Employer’s participation in the Prefunding Plan terminates, Employer maynot make contributions to the Prefunding Plan.
(4) After Employer’s participation in the Prefunding Plan terminates, disbursements from Employer’s Prefunding Account may continue upon Employer’s instruction or otherwise in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
(5) After the Employer’s participation in the Prefunding Plan terminates, the governing body of the Employer may request either:
(a) A trustee to trustee transfer of the assets in Employer’s Prefunding Account; provided that the Board shall have no obligation to make such transfer unless the Board determines that the transfer will satisfy applicable requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, other law and accounting standards, and the Board’s fiduciary duties. If 10 - 10
the Board determines that the transfer will satisfy these requirements, the Board shall then have one hundred fifty (150) days from the date of such determination to effect the transfer. The amount to be transferred shall be the amount in the Employer's Prefunding Account as of the date of the transfer (the “transfer date”) and shall include investment earnings up to an investment earnings allocation date preceding the transfer date. In no event shall the investment earnings allocation date precede the transfer date by more than 150 days.
(b) A disbursement of the assets in Employer’s Prefunding Account; provided that the Board shall have no obligation to make such disbursement unless the Board determines that, in compliance with the Internal Revenue Code, other law and accounting standards, and the Board’s fiduciary duties, all of Employer's obligations for payment of post-employment health care benefits and other post-employment benefits and reasonable administrative costs of the Board have been satisfied. If the Board determines that the disbursement will satisfy these requirements, the
Board shall then have one hundred fifty (150) days from the date of such determination to effect the disbursement. The amount to be disbursed shall be the amount in the Employer’s Prefunding Account as of the date of the disbursement (the “disbursement date”) and shall include investment earnings up to an investment earnings allocation date preceding the disbursement date. In no event shall the investment earnings allocation date precede the disbursement date by more than 150 days.
(6) After Employer’s participation in the Prefunding Plan terminates and at such time that no assets remain in Employer’s Prefunding Account, this Agreement shall terminate.
(7) If, for any reason, the Board terminates the Prefunding Plan, the assets in Employer’s Prefunding Account shall be paid to Employer after retention of (i) amounts sufficient to pay post-employment health care benefits and other postemployment benefits to annuitants for current and future annuitants described by the employer’s current substantive plan (as that term is used in GASB OPEB Standards), and (ii) amounts sufficient to pay reasonable administrative costs of the Board.
(8) If Employer ceases to exist but Employer’s Prefunding Plan continues to exist andif no provision has been made by Employer for ongoing payments to pay postemployment health care benefits and other post-employment benefits to annuitants for current and future annuitants, the Board is authorized to and shall appoint a third party administrator to carry out Employer's Prefunding Plan. Any 10 - 11
and all costs associated with such appointment shall be paid from the assets attributable to contributions by Employer.
(9) If Employer should breach the representation and warranty set forth in Paragraph A., the Board shall take whatever action it deems necessary to preserve the tax-exempt status of the Prefunding Plan.

SECTION 9.

I. General Provisions
(1) Books and Records.

Employer shall keep accurate books and records connected with the performance of this Agreement. Employer shall ensure that books and records of subcontractors, suppliers, and other providers shall also be accurately maintained. Such books and records shall be kept in a secure location at the Employer's office(s) and shall be available for inspection and copying by CalPERS and its representatives.
(2) Audit.
(a) During and for three years after the term of this Agreement, Employer shall permit the Bureau of State Audits, CalPERS, and its authorized representatives, and such consultants and specialists as needed, at all reasonable times during normal business hours to inspect and copy, at the expense of CalPERS, books and records of Employer relating to its performance of this Agreement.
(b) Employer shall be subject to examination and audit by the Bureau of State Audits, CalPERS, and its authorized representatives, and such consultants and specialists as needed, during the term of this Agreement and for three years after final payment under this Agreement. Any examination or audit shall be confined to those matters connected with the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering this Agreement. Employer shall cooperate fully with the Bureau of State Audits, CalPERS, and its authorized representatives, and such consultants and specialists as needed, in connection with any examination or audit. All adjustments, payments, and/or reimbursements determined to be necessary by any examination or audit shall be made promptly by the appropriate party.
(3) Notice.
(a) Any notice, approval, or other communication required or permitted 10 - 12
under this Agreement will be given in the English language and will be deemed received as follows:

1. Personal delivery. When personally delivered to the
recipient. Notice is effective on delivery.

2. First Class Mail. When mailed first class to the last address of the recipient known to the party giving notice. Notice is effective three delivery days after deposit in a United States Postal Service office or mailbox.

3. Certified mail. When mailed certified mail, return receipt requested. Notice is effective on receipt, if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt.

4. Overnight Delivery. When delivered by an overnight delivery service, charges prepaid or charged to the sender's account, Notice is effective on delivery, if delivery is confirmed by the delivery service.

5. Telex or Facsimile Transmission. When sent by telex or fax to the last telex or fax number of the recipient known to the party giving notice. Notice is effective on receipt, provided that (i) a duplicate copy of the notice is promptly given by first-class or certified mail or by overnight delivery, or (ii) the receiving party delivers a written
confirmation of receipt. Any notice given by telex or fax shall be deemed received on the next business day if it is received after 5:00 p.m. (recipient's time) or on a nonbusiness day.

6. E-mail transmission. When sent by e-mail using software that provides unmodifiable proof (i) that the message was sent, (ii) that the message was delivered to the recipient's information processing system, and (iii) of the time and date the message was delivered to the recipient along with a verifiable electronic record of the exact content of the message sent.

Addresses for the purpose of giving notice are as shown in Paragraph B.(1) of this Agreement.
(b) Any correctly addressed notice that is refused, unclaimed, or undeliverable because of an act or omission of the party to be notified shall be deemed effective as of the first date that said notice was refused, unclaimed, or deemed undeliverable by the postal authorities, messenger or overnight delivery service.
10 - 13
(c) Any party may change its address, telex, fax number, or e-mail address by giving the other party notice of the change in any manner permitted by this Agreement.
(d) All notices, requests, demands, amendments, modifications or other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing.

Notice shallbe sufficient for all such purposes if personally delivered, sent by first class, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, delivery by courier with receipt of delivery, facsimile transmission with written confirmation of receipt by recipient, or e-mail delivery with verifiable and unmodifiable proof of content and time and date of sending by sender and delivery to recipient. Notice is effective on confirmed receipt by recipient or 3 business days after sending, whichever is sooner.
(4) Survival
All representations, warranties, and covenants contained in this Agreement, or in any instrument, certificate, exhibit, or other writing intended by the parties to be a part of their Agreement shall survive the termination of this Agreement until such time as all amounts in Employer's Prefunding Account have been disbursed.
(5) Waiver
No waiver of a breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right, or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure, right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right, or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. (6) Necessary Acts, Further Assurances
The parties shall at their own cost and expense execute and deliver such further documents and instruments and shall take such other actions as may be reasonably required or appropriate to evidence or carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.

SECTION 10. The City Clerk of the City of South Pasadena shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and its approval by the City Council and shall cause the same to be listed in the records of the City. 10 - 14
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON this 16th day of March, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christina A. Muñoz Andrew L. Jared, City Attorney
Deputy City Clerk

10 - 15
A majority vote of Employer’s Governing Body at a public meeting held on the 16th day of the month of March in the year 2022, authorized entering into this Agreement.

Signature of the Presiding Officer:

Printed Name of the Presiding Officer:

Name of Governing Body:

Name of Employer:

Date:

BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM
BY

ARNITA PAIGE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM
To be completed by CalPERS
The effective date of this Agreement is:
10 - 16
ATTACHMENT 2
Resolution to Delegate Authority
to Request Disbursements
10 - 17
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA, CALIFORNIA,

DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO REQUEST DISBURSEMENTS

FROM CALPERS OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
(OPEB) PREFUNDING PLAN
WHEREAS, The City of South Pasadena would like to enter an agreement with CalPERS regarding the Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Prefunding Plan; and WHEREAS, CalPERS requires the City to fill and sign the Delegation of Authority to Request Disbursement form;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA,

CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Manager and/or his/her designee will have the authority to request on behalf of the Employer disbursements from the Other Post-Employment Benefits Prefunding Plan and to certify as to the purpose for which the disbursed funds will be used.

SECTION 2. The City Clerk of the City of South Pasadena shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and its approval by the City Council and shall cause the same to be listed in the records of the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON this 16th day of March, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christina A. Muñoz Andrew L. Jared, City Attorney
Deputy City Clerk
10 - 18
ATTACHMENT 3
CalPERS Long-term Returns
10 - 19
September 23, 2021
HOW WE GOT HERE – INVESTMENT RETURN
Returns (after 2001) shown are gross returns, unreduced for administrative expenses, from CalPERS valuation reports, when available. The discount rate is based on expected returns net of administrative expenses. 20-Year and 30-Yearaverage return rates on6/30/21 are 6.9% and8.3%, respectively 10 - 20
11 - 1
11 Resolution on Mandated Occupancy Inspections
March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

during the annual budget preparation or at another time set by the City Council. The City Council must acknowledge the receipt of the report by resolution.

In 2021, the Fire Department completed a total of 1248 inspections; 542 of the completed inspections were of State Mandatory Occupancies. The Fire Department was compliant in 2021 with its mandated inspection duties. The completed inspections were as follows:
• Business Inspections, 707
• Apartment Inspections, 532 – State Mandatory Occupancy • Schools, 7 – State Mandatory Occupancy

1. South Pasadena High School

2. South Pasadena Middle School

3. Marengo Elementary School

4. Monterey Hills Elementary School

5. Arroyo Vista Elementary School

6. Home Pre Schools and Day Care Centers

7. Holy Family Church
• Nursing Care Facility, 3– State Mandatory Occupancy

1. Prospect Manor

2. Meridian Manor

3. South Pasadena Care Center
Fiscal Impact
The Fire Department has been compliant with the annual inspections of mandated occupancies for at least the previous 10 years. The on-duty Fire Prevention Specialist as well as on-duty suppression personnel complete the inspections.

Attachment: Resolution
11 - 2
ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution Confirming
SPFD’s Compliance with
Mandated Inspections
11 - 3

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA, CALIFORNIA,
ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S

ANNUAL REPORT OF COMPLIANCE

WITH MANDATED INSPECTION DUTIES
WHEREAS, the Fire Department is required to inspect on an annual basis certain types of occupancies within the City; and
WHEREAS, these State Mandated Occupancies include schools, hotels, motels, lodging houses, apartment houses and assessor structures to those buildings; and
WHEREAS, in 2021, the Fire Department completed 1,248 occupancy inspections, 542 of which were State Mandated Occupancies; and WHEREAS, in completing 542 State Mandated Occupancy inspections, the Fire Department was compliant with its mandated inspection duties in the year 2021.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the City Council has received and acknowledge the Fire Department’s Annual Report of Compliance with mandated occupancy inspections.

SECTION 2. That, in 2021, the Fire Department has met the obligation of inspecting State Mandated Occupancies in the City.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk of the City of South Pasadena shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and its approval by the City Council and shall cause the same to be listed in the records of the City. 11 - 4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON this 16th day of March, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christina A. Muñoz Andrew L. Jared, City Attorney
Deputy City Clerk
11 - 5
City Council
Agenda Report ITEM NO. ___
DATE: March 16, 2022
FROM: Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
PREPARED BY: Christina Muñoz, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Authorize Reappointment of Commissioners to City Boards and Commissions
Recommendation
It is recommended by Mayor Cacciotti that the City Council reappoint the following incumbents to the three-year term ending December 31, 2024:
• Kristin Morrish, Cultural Heritage Commission
• Samantha Hill, Design Review Board
• Kay Younger, Design Review Board
• Zhen Tao, Finance Commission
• Bianca Richards, Library Board of Trustees
• Kim Hughes, Mobility and Transportation Infrastructure Commission • John Fisher, Mobility and Transportation Infrastructure Commission • Rona Bortz, Natural Resources and Environmental Commission • Casey Law, Natural Resources and Environmental Commission • Laura Dahl, Planning Commission
• Ed Donnelly, Public Safety Commission
• Stephanie Cao, Public Safety Commission
• Amin Al-Sarraf, Public Safety Commission
• Frank Catania, Public Works Commission
Background
On December 15, 2021, the City Council extended commissioner terms until March 31, 2022 in order for staff to conduct a comprehensive analysis of City boards and commissions. Recommendations were presented to Council on February 23, 2022, and direction was provided to staff on consolidation of certain commissions. The proposed appointments are for commissions that remain unaltered.

All proposed commissioners are eligible for reappointment and have expressed interest in serving another term. The proposed reappointment of incumbent commissioners allows for continuity and a quorum for the purposes of conducting commission business. 12 12 - 1
Commission Appointments
March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

Fiscal Impact
Cost for onboarding, training, and conducting commission meetings have been accounted for in department budgets.

Community Outreach
The City will continue public outreach and promotion of commission vacancies. For residents interested in serving on a City advisory body, applications are available on the City’s website or in the City Clerk’s Office.
12 - 2
City Council
Agenda Report ITEM NO. ___
DATE: March 16, 2022
FROM: Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
PREPARED BY: Lucy Demirjian, Management Services Director SUBJECT: Approval of Mayor’s List of City Council Liaison and Regional Group Appointments and Adoption of a Resolution Appointing Delegates, Representatives, and Alternates to Various
Agencies and Organizations
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve the Mayor’s list of City Council Liaison and Regional Group Appointments to various commissions, boards, and committees; and

2. Adopt a Resolution appointing delegates, representatives, and alternates as official representatives of the City of South Pasadena.

Background
At the beginning of every Mayoral term, appointments are made to various commissions, boards, committees, and regional groups for the calendar year. The majority of the appointments are recommended by the Mayor for Council approval; however, several agencies and organizations require City Council action by resolution.

This year, the item was delayed as the City Council requested staff conduct a comprehensive analysis of City boards and commissions. Recommendations were presented to Council on February 23, 2022, and direction was provided to staff on consolidation of certain commissions. The proposed appointments are for commissions that remain unaltered.

Analysis
The Mayor has submitted his list of City Council Liaison and Regional Group Appointments to the City Clerk’s Division. This is a routine annual item that requires approval by the City Council.

Fiscal Impact
Expenses for attending regional meetings are budgeted on an annual basis in the City Council budget.

Attachments:

1. List of Proposed City Council Liaison & Regional Group Appointments

2. Resolution Approving City Council Appointments to Various Governmental Entities and Organizations
13 - 1
13 ATTACHMENT 1
City Council Liaison &
Regional Group Appointments
13 - 2
Liaison and Regional Group Appointments
Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
March 16, 2022 to December 2022
City Commissions, Boards, and Committees Appointed Liaison Animal Commission* not active, lack of
quorum
Cultural Heritage Commission Zneimer
Design Review Board Mahmud
Finance Commission Mahmud
Fourth of July – Festival of Balloons Committee Primuth Mobility and Transportation Infrastructure Commission Primuth Library Board of Trustees Mahmud
Natural Resources and Environmental Commission Cacciotti Parks and Recreation Commission* Donovan
Planning Commission Mahmud
Public Arts Commission Cacciotti
Public Safety Commission Primuth
Public Works Commission Donovan
Senior Citizen Commission* Cacciotti
South Pasadena Tournament of Roses Committee Zneimer
Youth Commission* Donovan
* proposed for consolidation, pending
Ad Hoc/Committees and other assignments Appointed Liaisons Ad Hoc/Committee: City Council and SPUSD Subcommittee Primuth & Zneimer Ad Hoc/Committee: Mission-Meridian Village Subcommittee Donovan & Mahmud Ad Hoc/Committee: Caltrans Surplus Properties
Implementation
Primuth & Donovan
Ad Hoc/Committee: City Leased Properties Cacciotti & Donovan Representative:

South Pasadena Chamber of Commerce - Legislative Mahmud Representative:

South Pasadena Chamber of Commerce - Economic
Development
Primuth & Donovan
Representative:

South Pasadena Chamber of Commerce - Chamber Board City Manager 13 - 3
Liaison & Regional Group Appointments

Page 2 ends

Regional Groups – Appointment by City Appointed
Liaison Alternate(s)
 Arroyo Verdugo Communities Joint Powers
Authority Primuth Cacciotti
California Contract Cities Legislative
Committee Mahmud --
Foothill Workforce Development Policy Board Zneimer Donovan Los Angeles County City Selection
Committee
Cacciotti
(always Mayor) Primuth


∆
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts,
Board of Directors, District 16
Cacciotti
(always Mayor) Donovan
CalCities, Los Angeles Division and Annual
Conference Mahmud Zneimer


∆
Metro Gold Line Phase II Joint Powers
Authority Board Cacciotti Primuth


∆
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
Governing Board Cacciotti Primuth


∆
Southern California Association of
Governments General Assembly Mahmud Zneimer


∆
San Gabriel Valley Mosquito and Vector
Control District
Robert S. Joe
(Resident) Donovan
 Clean Power Alliance Mahmud Kim Hughes
/ Cacciotti
Regional Groups –Appointment by Regional
Group
Appointed
Liaison Alternate(s)
∆ Arroyo Verdugo Communities
Representative to the Southern California
Association of Governments Community,
Economic and Human Development
Committee
Mahmud None
 Arroyo Verdugo Communities Appointment
to the League of California Cities, LA County
Division Board of Directors
Mahmud None
  Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Cacciotti None


∆
South Coast Air Quality Management District
San Gabriel Valley Board Member Cacciotti None
 Requires FPPC Form
 Council vote
 Board Member is current Mayor; Alternate is appointed by Mayor  Voted by Regional Group
∆ Stipend
13 - 4
ATTACHMENT 2
Resolution Approving
City Council Appointments
to Various Governmental
Entities and Organizations
13 - 5
RES. VOL. 53 PAGE 5 01/17/2018
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA, CALIFORNIA,

APPOINTING DELEGATES, REPRESENTATIVES,

AND ALTERNATES AS OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES

OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of South Pasadena (City) at its regular meeting of March 16, 2022, reorganized as follows: Michael Cacciotti, Mayor; Jon Primuth, Mayor Pro Tem; Jack Donovan, Councilmember; Diana Mahmud, Councilmember; and Evelyn G. Zneimer, Councilmember; and WHEREAS, with the reorganization, the Mayor and the City Council make appointments to various agencies and organizations for the Mayoral term; and WHEREAS, several agencies and organizations require that the City Council formally approve its official delegates, representatives, and alternates to represent the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby confirm and appoint the following persons as Governing Board Representative and alternate member of the SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS for the term indicated:

Governing Board
Representative
Alternate Term
Mayor Cacciotti Mayor Pro Tem Primuth 2022
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby confirm and appoint the following persons as delegate and alternate member of the LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, LOS ANGELES DIVISION for the term indicated:

Delegate Alternate Term
Councilmember Mahmud Councilmember Zneimer 2022
13 - 6
RESOLUTION NO.

Page 2 ends

SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby confirm and appoint the following persons as board member and alternate board member of the LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DISTRICT 16 for the term indicated:

Board Member Alternate Term
Mayor Cacciotti Councilmember Donovan 2022
SECTION 4. The City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby confirm and appoint the following persons as delegate and alternate member of the METRO GOLD LINE PHASE II JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY BOARD for the term indicated:

Delegate Alternate Term
Mayor Cacciotti Mayor Pro Tem Primuth 2022
SECTION 5. The City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby confirm and appoint the following persons as delegate and alternate member of the ARROYO VERDUGO COMMUNITIES JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY for the term indicated:

Delegate Alternate Term
Mayor Pro Tem Primuth Mayor Cacciotti 2022
SECTION 6. The City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby confirm and appoint the following persons as delegate and alternate member of the SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS GENERAL ASSEMBLY for the term indicated:

Delegate Alternate Term
Councilmember Mahmud Councilmember Zneimer 2022
SECTION 7. The City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby confirm and appoint the following person as delegate member of the SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT for the term indicated:

Delegate Alternate Term
Robert S. Joe
(Community Member)
Councilmember Donovan Appointed to Term
Ending December
2022
13 - 7
RESOLUTION NO.

Page 3 ends

SECTION 8. The City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby confirm and appoint the following person as delegate member of the CLEAN POWER ALLIANCE for the term indicated:

Delegate Alternate Term
Councilmember Mahmud Mayor Cacciotti,
Kim Hughes
2022
SECTION 9. Pursuant to the appointments made above, the City Council of the City of South Pasadena does hereby adopt the completed Form 806 of the Fair Political Practices Commission, and directs staff to take all other actions necessary to comply with the requirements of any applicable laws and regulations.

SECTION 10. The City Clerk of the City of South Pasadena shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and its approval by the City Council and shall cause the same to be listed in the records of the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON this 16th day of March, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christina A. Muñoz Andrew L. Jared, City Attorney
Deputy City Clerk
13 - 8
14 - 1
14 1503-1507 El Centro Lease Agreement, Second Amendment March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

Attachments:

1. 1503-1507 El Centro Lease Agreement

2. First Amendment to Lease Agreement

3. Second Amendment to Lease Agreement
14 - 2
ATTACHMENT 1
1503-1507 El Centro Lease Agreement
14 - 3
14 - 4
14 - 5
14 - 6
14 - 7
14 - 8
14 - 9
14 - 10
14 - 11
14 - 12
14 - 13
14 - 14
14 - 15
ATTACHMENT 2
First Amendment to Lease Agreement
14 - 16
14 - 17
14 - 18
ATTACHMENT 3
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement
14 - 19

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT
This Second Amendment to the Lease Agreement (“SECOND AMENDMENT”) is made and entered into this 16th day of March, 2022 by and between the SOUTH PASADENA HOUSING AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic, ("LESSOR") and STEPHEN GODWIN AND SALLY SMYTHE, individuals, jointly and separately, as husband and wife ("LESSEE"). LESSOR and LESSEE shall collectively be known as the “PARTIES”.

RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, LESSOR’s predecessor in interest and LESSEE entered into a Lease Agreement dated November 15, 2009 ("LEASE") concerning the real property located at and commonly known as 1503 and 1507 El Centro, in the City of South Pasadena, Los Angeles County, State of California, which is improved with a building, known as the "nursery" building and a parking lot (the entirety of the real property and improvements is referred to hereafter as the "PROPERTY"); and,
B. WHEREAS, the LEASE was amended by the Parties by entering into an Amendment to the Lease Agreement (“the FIRST AMENDMENT”) on July 16, 2014. Among other things, the FIRST AMENDMENT changed the amount of monthly rent payable by LESSEE, and acknowledged the transfer of ownership from the LESSOR’S predecessors in interest to the LESSOR; and
C. WHEREAS, the LEASE provided for a term of lease through October 31, 2011, whereafter the LEASE converted to a month-to-month tenancy; and D. WHEREAS, the PARTIES acknowledge that since November 1, 2011, LESSEE has been occupying the PROPERTY on a month-to-month tenancy pursuant to the “Holding Over” provisions of Section 17 Miscellaneous of the LEASE; and .

E. WHEREAS, the LESSOR and LESSEE now mutually desire to continue such month-to-month tenancy, subject to all of the covenants, conditions, and obligations contained in the LEASE and FIRST AMENDMENT, as amended herein.

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, Lessor and Lessee mutually agree as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The Recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Holding Over: Section 17 Miscellaneous “Holding Over” of the LEASE is amended to read as follows:

Holding Over
If LESSEE has not been served with a notice of termination and desires to continue its tenancy beyond the expiration of the term specified in Section 2 herein, said tenancy shall automatically convert to a hold over month-to-month tenancy. LESSEE has held tenancy as a hold over month-to-month tenancy 14 - 20
since November 1, 2011. LESSEE may continue to hold tenancy as a hold over month-to-month tenancy until termination, provided that LESSEE shall have no right to hold over beyond March 31, 2024. Such holding over shall be construed to be a tenancy from month to month, subject to all the covenants, conditions and obligations contained in this Lease. LESSEE may terminate the LEASE by giving LESSOR thirty days written notice of termination. LESSOR may terminate the LEASE by giving LESSEE sixty days written notice of termination.

Either party may terminate the lease on or after the expiration date by giving the other thirty days written notice. The rent shall be increased to $2,925.00 per month during these hold over periods, commencing March 1, 2022. by five (5%) commencing on the first of the month of the hold over period and may be increased thereafter by LESSOR with a thirty (30) day written notice. Neither party is required to provide notice of termination prior to the conclusion of the final optional hold over period ending March 31, 2024.

The remainder of Section 17 shall remain unchanged.

SECTION 3. Short Term Rentals: LESSEE shall be allowed to rent portions of the Building and/or parking area on a short-term basis consistent with this section. LEASE Section 6 “Use and Maintenance of the Property” and Section 12 “Assignment and Subletting” shall remain in full force and effect except as amended herein by implication. The PARTIES agree that requests by LESSEE to rent portions of the Building and/or parking area of the Property on a temporary basis to others may be denied by LESSOR for any reason or no reason. The PARTIES agree that requests for short term rentals shall be processed in the following manner and under the following conditions:
a. LESSEE shall first notify LESSOR of the intended temporary rental in writing of the intended use by and identity of the renter;
b. LESSEE shall provide a copy of the proposed contract to LESSOR prior to entering into such rental agreement. Prior to such rental agreement becoming effective, LESSEE shall obtain written approval from LESSOR authorization to engage in such rental agreement;
c. LESSEE shall provide copy of insurance naming the LESSOR as an additional insured for activities of the renter on the PROPERTY in the amounts specified herein;
d. LESSOR shall receive 80% of all revenue and LESSEE shall receive 20% of all revenue from each rental activity; and
e. LESSEE may not assign its interests in the LEASE to any other party basis other than short term rental.

SECTION 4. Insurance: The coverage level for insurance required pursuant to Section 10.b of the LEASE shall be increased to $2,000,000 per occurrence, and $4,000,000 aggregate. Lessee agrees to provide proof of insurance naming the “City of South Pasadena” and the “Housing Authority of the City of South Pasadena” as additionally insureds (general public liability insurance). All other terms and conditions of Section 10.b shall remain unchanged.
14 - 21
SECTION 5. Additional Remaining terms: all other terms of the existing LEASE and the FIRST AMENDMENT not expressly or impliedly amended by this SECOND AMENDMENT shall remain unchanged and in effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease as of the date first above written.

LESSEE:

Stephen Godwin

Sally Smythe
LESSOR:
_____
Arminé Chaparyan, Executive Director
Approved as to form:

Andrew L. Jared, City Attorney
14 - 22
15 - 1
15 City Council
Agenda Report
DATE: March 16, 2022
FROM: Armine Chaparyan, City Manager r~
PREPARED BY: Lucy Demirjian, Management Services Director ITEM NO.

SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Receive Public Input Regarding Boundaries for South Pasadena City Council Districts; and First Reading and Introduction of an Ordinance Designating A City Council Election District Map as Required by the Elections Code Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input regarding the boundaries of potential City Council election districts based on 2020 U.S. Census data, as required by applicable law;

2. Review draft map(s); and

3. Read by title only for first reading, waving further reading, and introduce an ordinance designating a City Council Election District Map under Elections Code Sections 21600-21609.

Background
Every ten years, cities with by-district election systems must use new census data to review and, if needed, redraw district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. This process, called redistricting, ensures all districts have nearly equal population. The redistricting process for the City of South Pasadena must be completed by April 17, 2022.

The City adopted its current district boundaries on October 4, 2017 (Ordinance No. 2318), changing from at-large to district-based elections with respect to electing members of the City Council. The City Council adopted a final District Elections map comprised of five districts. The districts must now be redrawn using the 2020 census data and in compliance with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020.

Under the Act, the district boundaries adopted by the City Council shall comply with following criteria in the listed order of priority (Elections Code 21601 (c) for general law cities/ 21621 (c) for charter cities):

1. Substantially equal in population;

2. Geographically contiguous;

3. Undivided neighborhoods and "communities of interest;" Redistricting – Public Hearing
March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 4 ends

4. Easily identifiable boundaries; and

5. Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people)
More importantly, the adopted maps cannot favor or discriminate against a political party, incumbent, or political candidate.

Once the prioritized criteria are met, other traditional districting principles can be considered, such as:

1. Minimize the number of voters delayed from voting in 2022 to 2024;

2. Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office; and

3. Future population growth.

By law, the City must hold at least four public hearings that enable community members to provide input on the drawing of district maps:
• At least one hearing must occur before the City draws draft maps. • At least two hearings must happen after the drawing of draft maps. • The fourth hearing can happen either before or after the drawing of draft maps. • City staff or consultants may hold a public workshop instead of one of the required public redistricting hearings.

To increase the accessibility of these hearings, the City must take the following steps:
• At least one hearing must occur on a Saturday, Sunday, or after 6 p.m. on a weekday.
• If a redistricting hearing is consolidated with another local government meeting, the redistricting hearing portion must begin at a pre-designated time. • Local public redistricting hearings should be made accessible to people with disabilities.

The public hearing process consists of two phases: 1) phase one seeks public input regarding communities of interest and 2) phase two seeks public input regarding election district boundaries. During the entire process, City staff and the demographer will inform the public about the redistricting process and teach them how to use the mapping tools.

A “community of interest” under the relevant Elections Code for cities (Section 21601(c) / 21621(c)] is “a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation.

Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates.”
Possible features defining a community of interest might include, but are not limited to:

A. School attendance areas;
B. Natural dividing lines such as major roads, hills, or highways; 15 - 2
Redistricting – Public Hearing
March 16, 2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

C. Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks; D. Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns; and
E. Shared demographic characteristics, such as:
(1) Similar levels of income, education, or linguistic insolation; (2) Languages spoken at home; and
(3) Single-family and multi-family housing unit areas.

Summary
The City commenced the redistricting process in September, 2021 with the assistance of a demographer, National Demographics Corporation (NDC), and communications consultant, Tripepi Smith. The City has conducted comprehensive outreach to engage community stakeholders (Attachment 3). Efforts to date include:
• Dedicated webpage on redistricting with information on the process, schedule, and mapping tools.
• Social media, phone and email outreach promoting educational material on redistricting, including press releases, flyers and videos. • Direct contact with community-based organizations via phone to inform them of the redistricting process and how to get involved.
• October 28, 2021 virtual community workshop about redistricting and communities of interest. Recording made available on the City website. • Public Hearings held November 17, 2021 and January 19, 2022 to gather public input on neighborhoods and communities of interest.
• Community survey encouraging residents to share their communities of interest through the City’s redistricting website.
• Mailer sent to all South Pasadena residents on January 14, 2022 with information on the redistricting process and schedule.
• January 31, 2022 virtual community workshop to review redistricting process, gather input on neighborhoods and communities of interest, and demonstrate the various mapping tools. Recording is available on the City website. • Public Heating held March 2, 2022 to review draft maps and receive inout on district boundaries.

On November 17, 2021, the City Council held its first public meeting to receive a report on the redistricting process and permissible criteria to be considered to redraw district boundaries. Public input on communities of interest was also gathered during the meeting as well as an introduction to the City’s redistricting website. Following the first public hearing, the City launched a survey asking residents to identify their communities of interest, which are communities that should remain intact in the redistricting process.

Survey results and comments received throughout the process will be posted to the City’s redistricting website. In addition, the online and paper mapping tools are now available for residents to draw their own maps for City Council to consider for adoption.

Informational mailers were sent to residents early January to provide a brief explanation of the process, availability of mapping tools, and upcoming public meeting dates. 15 - 3
Redistricting – Public Hearing
March 16, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

On January 19, 2022, the City Council conducted a second public hearing to seek additional public input on communities of interest, the composition of maps, and to review the available public mapping tools. Following that hearing, a virtual community workshop was held on January 31, 2022 to demonstrate the various public mapping tools to the public.

On March 2, 2022, the City Council conducted a third public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries. NDC presented draft maps, received by the February 18, 2022 deadline, and reviewed criteria, such as population balance and geographical contiguity. After receiving public input, Council provided direction to eliminate Maps 102, 104, 106 and 108 (Blue) from consideration. Additional direction was provided on the balance of the maps.

Draft maps are posted to the City’s website (www.southpasadenaca.gov/redistricting) and available at City Hall in the Office of the City Clerk. Public input on maps is encouraged throughout the process. The final deadline to submit a map was Monday, March 7, 2022 by noon in order for review by the demographer and posting on the website seven (7) days prior to the March 16 hearing, as required by law.

The goal of tonight’s hearing is to receive input on favorable maps to further narrow map options. If a district map is selected this evening, the first reading of the ordinance adopting the new district boundaries will proceed, with second reading and adoption of the ordinance on April 6, 2022.

Fiscal Impact
The FY 2021-22 Budget includes funding for the demographic consultant, outreach and meeting facilitation services, and translation services in the Elections Account 101- 1020-1022-8170.

Next Steps
The City Council is required to adopt new district boundaries before the April 17, 2022 deadline. Since the district map established in 2017 was adopted by ordinance, a first reading and introduction (March 16) and second reading and adoption (April 6) of an ordinance will be required to ratify the new boundaries. The adopted district map will be in effect for the next regular municipal election in November 2022.

Public Noticing
A Public Hearing Notice was published March 4, 2022 in the South Pasadena Review.

Attachments:

1. Draft maps

2. Draft Ordinance
15 - 4
ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Maps
15 - 5
15 - 6
South Pasadena Redistricting 2022
Public 101 , .... ,' .... , I ' I '
r- - - -r--- ------ --- - ---.------- ---- - --- --f ', I I I I \ t, ~ I / : 'f'l ', I I .::,.0 , I i,_\I ' I I '{'",' I <?J ~ I
\ \ .::,.0,, I fi \
\ l:i:, f?' I b \
I::; 0 I [}J I
/ lO 0 1 1 I <tJ Gl - ra ~°i' ,,, Q "' .... ,
.... 'o ~, I"' ~ ' ( r O I Gce,ella Si PASADENA ,w1' ~ 'i j I I l ,, :~ / I I <D 1.., , 1 Magnolia St 1. ,
,, ,' -------1 Garfield Park \
I I I \
/ I I / ,, I Mission St \
/ ,' I \ , I El Centro St '---------, \
I I I \
____ .,,,,,,,,,,.. ,/ 2 ! 5 ..... , I I I \
,. .. ' 1 "'_1-i_a,wtho!:,n~ Jl- ___ 1 : \ r- ____ l\,(IQ.Q.t~rgy$..9_ - - - - \ - ~ : ----- :..-----------, ,.----•--- I [S: \ I I I g; I "' \ ,., : , <( ,'---------1~ \
r-' <!!:·';' { } '8 \
~, I ~ ~ \
3 ~ 4. ~ (D \ ..s,-ffr[ ,,. Eddie Park \
I i- \ I 18-- \
I \~ \ : .. ~ \\
I ® \ I I ~y~~-
C..,. I ' \ ') I \
,' ,' ', 4 ' / I I :
, ,' ,' ~ I Huntington D/---------------.1 !., I ,,~
,,<f(o I ,v
' .. ~,.s't '\ ,,,
,, ' I '1 \ I
,,' I \
I \
I
I
: I I

I I I '------------------------------------------------------'------------------------------ Water Area
-- Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER [::: Current Districts
Public 101
District 1
Total Pop 5,175
Deviation from ideal -229
% Deviation -4.24%
% Hisp 23.1%
% NH White 37%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian-American 32%
Total 2,906
% Hisp 17%
% NH White 55%
% NH Black 8%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 20%
Total 3,066
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 14%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 57%
% NH Black 8%
Total 2,647
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 14%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 57%
% NH Black 8%
Total 1,781
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 13%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black est. 8%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 4,799
age0-19 30%
age20-60 57%
age60plus 13%
immigrants 24%
naturalized 50%
english 67%
spanish 10%
asian-lang 19%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 10%
hs-grad 21%
bachelor 33%
graduatedegree 37%
Child in Household child-under18 47%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 70%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 49%
income 200k-plus 17%
single family 42%
multi-family 58%
rented 65%
owned 35%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,208
-196
-3.63%
26%
37%
3%
31%
3,575
24%
44%
5%
27%
3,344
22%
20%
15%
2%
55%
6%
2,891
22%
20%
14%
2%
56%
6%
2,061
23%
21%
12%
1%
57%
6%
5,244
26%
55%
19%
24%
62%
65%
14%
17%
3%
12%
21%
31%
38%
33%
72%
12%
11%
14%
42%
21%
46%
54%
56%
44%
3 5,505
101

1.87%
14%
29%
3%
52%
3,652
11%
44%
4%
42%
3,804
11%
11%
36%
1%
48%
4%
3,329
11%
10%
35%
1%
49%
5%
2,601
11%
11%
31%
1%
52%
5%
5,158
23%
53%
24%
28%
73%
64%
8%
26%
2%
14%
19%
34%
33%
36%
67%
6%
7%
9%
39%
39%
81%
19%
30%
70%
4 5,671
267

4.94%
22%
31%
3%
42%
3,497
22%
46%
2%
31%
3,693
19%
18%
23%
2%
55%
1%
3,174
19%
17%
22%
2%
56%
2%
2,379
19%
18%
19%
1%
59%
1%
5,353
28%
56%
17%
28%
63%
61%
14%
23%
2%
15%
23%
35%
29%
38%
71%
14%
12%
14%
40%
21%
49%
51%
60%
40%
5 5,461
57 1.05%
20%
46%
2%
30%
3,736
18%
61%
0%
21%
3,910
15%
14%
18%
1%
66%
0%
3,488
14%
13%
18%
1%
67%
0%
2,842
13%
13%
16%
1%
70%
0%
5,110
23%
57%
20%
21%
66%
71%
9%
15%
5%
8%
22%
35%
35%
31%
70%
7%
16%
11%
44%
23%
64%
36%
49%
51%
Total
27,020
496

9.18%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
02/21/2022 14:51 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 7
I I
I
I
I
I
15 - 8
South Pasadena Redistricting 2022 , .... ,' .... , Public ,' ', 103 ,------r--- ------ --- - ---r- - - --- - - --- ------( ', : : ; : \ ~, I I ✓ I ~ l ', I I :,.Cb I I 1.i..,I \ I I (bz,,1 I ro ~ I
\ \ .>., I {j '\
\ I)> f?' I 'b \
l=l 0 I (}1 I
I ~ ~ 1' I ro Gl - ro ,-,; I 1 Ol - -, (' f~ cf': 1 PASADENA FWY II~ ~ \ \ , 1 Grevelia St "" ro 1 I I I .; I
' I I / la3
/ I I ~ I I Magnolia St '--------, \ ✓ I I Garfield Park 1 1' I I \
/ / I 4 \
/ ,, Mission St I \
/ / El Centro St I \
,,, ,,,, ~ '---------, \
____ .,,..,,,.. ,,, / I ! , .. , I I I \
, .. , 1 ,._f-ti,wtho!:_n2Jl----, i J : \ r-----f,()Q..Q.t§.r.§Y~.9-----~-j : ----- :..-----------, '< r---- I ~:S: \. 1 Lyii11
• don St I a, 1 1ru \
,,_I ~O I J ~ ,'---------~ \ _., w,on\e{e'! ,g,,, { g • '° ' r .,,_Q;'-,' 1 E : ~ \
Q~' I J: I a3 \ -i~,' ~ I Rollin St Eddie Park \ a I 1
~ :8-- I \
1 I~ : Oak St \
/I '~ I \ I (I)\ I \
/ I ~]JII)[.SJ_, \\
c... I ') I \ \
, / C{,5\ / ~3 \ 5 '·
/ Gi\\e\\e / 0 I I
I ,' I ~ \ H 1· I D 1
{: ., un 1ng on /----------------' !., I co,,.,,,, ,-1ro I ,.., ' ,%>~ \ / "',<5'1 \ ,
",, \ I I I I
,1 I \
: ~O. \ I
I --J\e~ I
-..i,'-a.\\e'1 :
2 I I I
\. _______________________________________ ...,! _______ .!_ __ 1 _____________________________ _ Water Area -- Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER [::: Current Districts
Public 103
District 1
Total Pop 5,202
Deviation from ideal -202
% Deviation -3.74%
% Hisp 23.6%
% NH White 42%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 29%
Total 3,619
% Hisp 20%
% NH White 51%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 24%
Total 3,481
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 15%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 5%
Total 3,043
% Latino est. 19%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 14%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black 5%
Total 2,098
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 13%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black est. 5%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 5,286
age0-19 27%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 19%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 56%
english 70%
spanish 13%
asian-lang 14%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 9%
hs-grad 21%
bachelor 28%
graduatedegree 40%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 71%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 45%
income 200k-plus 20%
single family 48%
multi-family 52%
rented 56%
owned 44%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,558
154

2.85%
15%
27%
3%
52%
3,711
14%
40%
4%
42%
3,925
13%
12%
35%
1%
46%
5%
3,422
13%
12%
34%
1%
47%
5%
2,656
13%
12%
31%
1%
50%
6%
5,194
24%
53%
24%
28%
75%
64%
9%
26%
2%
14%
18%
35%
33%
36%
68%
6%
9%
8%
37%
39%
77%
23%
31%
69%
3 5,730
326

6.03%
24%
34%
3%
36%
3,419
19%
51%
2%
28%
3,473
20%
18%
19%
2%
58%
2%
2,963
19%
18%
18%
2%
58%
2%
2,149
20%
19%
15%
2%
60%
2%
5,229
26%
56%
18%
29%
61%
60%
13%
26%
2%
15%
23%
35%
28%
36%
69%
13%
10%
16%
40%
20%
50%
50%
57%
43%
4 5,358
-46
-0.85%
22%
38%
4%
33%
3,094
21%
53%
7%
19%
3,162
19%
18%
15%
1%
58%
7%
2,783
19%
17%
15%
1%
59%
6%
2,108
18%
17%
13%
1%
62%
6%
5,071
29%
60%
12%
22%
54%
62%
12%
20%
5%
10%
24%
33%
36%
43%
73%
11%
12%
16%
48%
13%
35%
65%
73%
27%
5 5,172
-232
-4.29%
19%
40%
2%
37%
3,523
17%
56%
0%
26%
3,776
15%
14%
22%
1%
62%
0%
3,318
15%
14%
22%
1%
64%
0%
2,653
14%
13%
19%
1%
67%
0%
4,885
26%
54%
20%
23%
69%
73%
9%
16%
3%
11%
20%
36%
33%
35%
72%
8%
15%
7%
42%
28%
71%
29%
44%
56%
Total
27,020
558

10.33%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
02/21/2022 15:24 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 9
I I
I
I
I
I
15 - 10
South Pasadena Redistricting 2022
Public 105 ,',..., ,' ', , ' , \.
r- - - -r-- --- - - - - - - - - - - - -r-- --- - - --- --- - - --( ', I I I I \ t, I I / : \.:,.,1 '-, '. I .:,.'l! ' I J\1 ' I I '<"/ I IIJ '.I I \ \ 'l), ' c::: , ' ► 1' I {!j \.\.
\ q 0 I IIJ I
\0 r I "' '---
/ Pc3 ~f I cf:f G) -....,.,.
; ! i{jl 1 !;n Ol )
,"' ,r;;/ 6 I ~- ~ C
: j ,· ======= PASADENA FWY I~ ~ \ : 1 :; Grevelia St ro j I I 1c\i I.. , / Magnolia St I 1- ______ --, ' 1 ,✓ I I / \
, I I / \
✓/ / Mission St : \ , -; I '
/ / I ;;:: 4 \ , , t---------, g \
' ' El Centro St I :::i 1
/ / a. ' ..,, , I ► ' ____ .,, , G) I c\i '"'\
I / ro I \
,_,,' •:~aAh.?.T! _s,!. ___ -, g- ~ : Monter§Y-F--2- - - - - -,- _ ,! f ~----------~ ~ r-1------; k----~~~- \
,,.• oo I ~ ' a. <{ Lyndon SjL--------!~ ', n\ere'! " 1 1 ?? _ _ r-' Wlo ~fl : ro ~ : '8 \ 2 Qi, • ~ , t \ Q, I LL (1) \
.s,.f!:,' ~ \ I i- \ ' .~ \ I \~ \
,' \.~ I \
I (1)\ I \.

I I 'r-a.l,l~l.,$_.t_J \\
'-.. I ' ] ,' \ 5 \
I : I
,,/ 3 ! \ I f _,J ~, v' •.:</;A I , '~,$" \ , ",<5'(, \ /' ' \ I ,• \ ., I
,"' \ . I
I I
I
I
I
Huntington D,r;---------------2
I I

I I I I I
'---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - _ ...,!_ - - - - - _ .:._ __ _;_ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - _ .J Water Area
-- Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER [: :: Current Districts
Public 105
District 1
Total Pop 5,199
Deviation from ideal -205
% Deviation -3.79%
% Hisp 22.9%
% NH White 43%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 28%
Total 3,274
% Hisp 16%
% NH White 57%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 23%
Total 3,397
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 15%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 3%
Total 2,951
% Latino est. 17%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 15%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 3%
Total 2,097
% Latino est. 19%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 13%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 4,762
age0-19 24%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 25%
naturalized 54%
english 70%
spanish 11%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 9%
hs-grad 21%
bachelor 29%
graduatedegree 39%
Child in Household child-under18 32%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 68%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 20%
single family 52%
multi-family 48%
rented 52%
owned 48%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,463
59 1.09%
21%
31%
3%
42%
3,708
21%
39%
6%
34%
3,703
18%
17%
25%
1%
49%
7%
3,232
18%
17%
25%
1%
50%
7%
2,396
18%
16%
23%
1%
51%
8%
5,279
26%
53%
21%
27%
73%
64%
12%
22%
2%
14%
18%
35%
35%
35%
70%
9%
11%
11%
38%
32%
60%
40%
44%
56%
3 5,347
-57
-1.05%
19%
27%
3%
49%
3,397
16%
44%
2%
38%
3,456
17%
15%
31%
2%
50%
2%
2,947
16%
15%
31%
2%
50%
2%
2,225
17%
16%
27%
1%
53%
2%
5,111
25%
55%
19%
28%
64%
61%
11%
26%
2%
15%
24%
33%
28%
37%
71%
11%
7%
13%
44%
24%
61%
39%
51%
49%
4 5,405
1 0.02%
22%
38%
4%
33%
3,116
21%
53%
6%
19%
3,173
19%
18%
15%
1%
58%
7%
2,791
19%
17%
15%
1%
59%
6%
2,115
18%
17%
13%
1%
62%
6%
5,103
29%
59%
12%
22%
54%
62%
12%
20%
5%
10%
24%
33%
36%
42%
72%
11%
12%
16%
48%
13%
35%
65%
73%
27%
5 5,606
202

3.74%
19%
41%
2%
35%
3,871
17%
57%
0%
26%
4,088
15%
14%
21%
1%
63%
0%
3,608
14%
13%
20%
1%
64%
0%
2,831
14%
13%
17%
1%
68%
0%
5,408
26%
54%
20%
23%
68%
71%
9%
17%
3%
11%
19%
36%
32%
36%
70%
9%
15%
8%
39%
29%
69%
31%
45%
55%
Total
27,020
407

7.53%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
02/21/2022 15:59 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 11
I I
I
I
I
I
15 - 12
South Pasadena Redistricting 2022
, ..... , .... Public 107 , , ' .. , ',
r-- - - -r----- - - - - - - - --- - - -,-- - --- - - --- --- - - --( \ I I I I \ t, I I I IA , I I / I ~ I ' \ I ; I '-'..' I ' \ I G) ' I m1J I \ \ ,' I c: '11 I I ID ; Q) '
\ \)> ::, I I -0 ' l ,~ o_ I I {g I
o )> I I ct! ~
I r< < I 2 I Q - ....
, i° ro ' r,, ) 1;; ,';! I r~. f
: ; 1· PASADENA FWY I~ '\ \ I (en I
I I I I)> QJ I
I / I lt5~ I.
;' I I C '
, ,' '---------, ~ \ / I \ ; I \ , , I \
/ / Mission St : Gl \ / -, I ~ '
/ / ::J I "" ' , , C. ~ \
J , oi. El Centro St l.--------, o- 1
/ ,/ ~ I ~ \ .. /; , i5 3 I '" ,----✓ ,, : \
.,,,., / 1 Monter§y.B-.Q _ - - - - -,--1 ;; •---' --------, I t ,-----~ ~- \ I I ----- I ------., ,------------ I I ', 11,.---- I I QJ I I I \ ,-• r1-o : J ~ ,1- - - - - - - - - . s: \
- ' • •on\e1e'l ,,.,! .' a, g : e;ro \ r \~' <c'f , ~ E 1 :::i , Qi"~ I "O ~ I cc \
..s.~J'J : ~ LL Rollin: St i \ I I ct! ro \ \ I O I \
\ I -;_ 0'- I 4 \
I '..,~- 0 ,it- I \
1 I $:· I \
I ~ I a, \
I I ,------J ~ \
(.._., I~ I c: \
, 1 \ Spruce St ~ ' I I \ ~ I ,, I I I
, I ' I ,; , ' Huntington D.r; _______________ .,! I I _,,J I .._, I ;
tj~ I ,~ 5
",l?<'i> ' ,, ",IS't \ I
~.. ' I .. , I ' I
,;' ~ ~ I \ I
I I
I I

I I I I I
Water Area

I I I I
\.--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - _ .J_ - - .J. - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - -- Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER [: :: Current Districts
Public 107
District 1
Total Pop 5,505
Deviation from ideal 101
% Deviation 1.87%
% Hisp 13.9%
% NH White 29%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 52%
Total 3,652
% Hisp 11%
% NH White 44%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 42%
Total 3,804
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 36%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 48%
% NH Black 4%
Total 3,329
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 35%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 49%
% NH Black 5%
Total 2,601
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 31%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 52%
% NH Black est. 5%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 5,158
age0-19 23%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 28%
naturalized 73%
english 64%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 26%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 14%
hs-grad 19%
bachelor 34%
graduatedegree 33%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 67%
income 0-25k 6%
income 25-50k 7%
income 50-75k 9%
income 75-200k 39%
income 200k-plus 39%
single family 81%
multi-family 19%
rented 30%
owned 70%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,396
-8
-0.15%
24%
36%
4%
33%
3,447
22%
46%
8%
24%
3,383
23%
21%
14%
1%
54%
9%
2,936
22%
20%
14%
1%
55%
9%
1,955
22%
21%
13%
1%
55%
9%
5,424
31%
56%
14%
23%
56%
66%
12%
18%
4%
11%
21%
31%
37%
44%
72%
13%
8%
13%
47%
20%
44%
56%
62%
38%
3 5,436
32 0.59%
24%
36%
3%
33%
3,375
19%
49%
4%
27%
3,268
19%
18%
16%
2%
59%
3%
2,799
19%
18%
16%
2%
59%
3%
2,022
20%
19%
13%
2%
60%
3%
5,044
24%
56%
20%
26%
59%
65%
13%
20%
3%
12%
20%
31%
36%
32%
69%
12%
12%
15%
39%
21%
47%
53%
56%
44%
4 5,384
-20
-0.37%
20%
45%
2%
30%
3,739
17%
62%
1%
20%
3,783
15%
14%
18%
1%
66%
1%
3,378
15%
14%
18%
1%
66%
1%
2,758
14%
13%
15%
1%
69%
1%
5,310
25%
55%
19%
20%
63%
71%
10%
14%
4%
8%
22%
36%
36%
34%
69%
7%
15%
12%
42%
25%
61%
39%
50%
50%
5 5,299
-105
-1.94%
22%
33%
3%
41%
3,152
23%
46%
2%
28%
3,579
19%
18%
23%
1%
56%
2%
3,087
19%
17%
22%
1%
57%
2%
2,328
18%
17%
19%
1%
60%
1%
4,727
27%
57%
16%
29%
64%
62%
13%
23%
3%
16%
24%
35%
28%
36%
75%
13%
12%
13%
46%
16%
49%
51%
63%
37%
Total
27,020
206

3.81%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
02/21/2022 16:22 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 13
I I
I
I
I
I
15 - 14
South Pasadena Redistricting 2022
NDC Green Map , .... ,' .... , I ' I '
r- - - - -r-- --- - - - - - - - - - - - -r-- --- - - --- --- - - --( ', I I I I \ t, I : / : t• ', 't I I I l.t: \I ' \ \ II I C1l ~ I \ \ I I C:: \
I ,, I .gj \ ,
\ I / I l1l I
I / I °' ...... / I / I Q~ .... ,
,,' : : !~ ~ (
I I ,' 1· PASADENA FWY / I~ ::: \ \ \ I ~
I ,_I I 2 ► I I q I ~ / ff I CD ~'\
~ ~ \ / il -------1 / Garfield Park '
,' / I / \
/ 1 Mission St 1 4 \ ,, ,, I '
/ / I \ , I :::, '---------, \
,' ,,,, i / J : \ / 1 I Ol C '"\
,----✓ I ~ -~ \
.,., / CD :g • Monterey Rd ----------..--1
.- .. ::!----------~ ------, ~r--------J.. ,-------- \ : ... ---- I I : I \ L I \ ,.• : ., ,--------· \ ,\ I 3 \
r / \
1 , '1 \ (_, I \ .., ,<> I I Edd ie Park \
O,Z : I \
~ , : \
<;>'5'' \ \
1 ', \ I ' \ / I \
, I r----- \
(.._ I \
] ,' \ 5 ' I I I I / i \ : ,,' • ' Huntington D;; _______________ .,! I I ;~ , ~, I ; ,-11,o I ,.., " , %>.;, \ I
"','5'1 \ ,'
',, I / I I
I \ ',
I ,, ' . I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
'--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - ..... - - .I. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - .J Water Area
-- Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER [::: Current Districts
NDC Green
District 1
Total Pop 5,510
Deviation from ideal 106
% Deviation 1.96%
% Hisp 19.2%
% NH White 28%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 47%
Total 3,572
% Hisp 20%
% NH White 35%
% NH Black 6%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 39%
Total 3,662
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 31%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 45%
% NH Black 8%
Total 3,178
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 31%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 46%
% NH Black 8%
Total 2,481
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 28%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 48%
% NH Black est. 8%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 5,074
age0-19 26%
age20-60 52%
age60plus 23%
immigrants 29%
naturalized 75%
english 63%
spanish 11%
asian-lang 24%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 14%
hs-grad 17%
bachelor 37%
graduatedegree 35%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 68%
income 0-25k 6%
income 25-50k 11%
income 50-75k 10%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 37%
single family 70%
multi-family 30%
rented 35%
owned 65%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,571
167

3.09%
22%
42%
4%
29%
3,603
15%
58%
4%
23%
3,682
18%
17%
15%
1%
63%
3%
3,213
17%
17%
15%
1%
63%
3%
2,170
18%
17%
13%
1%
64%
3%
5,141
24%
55%
22%
24%
53%
70%
10%
15%
4%
9%
21%
28%
40%
31%
68%
13%
10%
13%
45%
20%
50%
50%
54%
46%
3 5,409
5 0.09%
21%
32%
3%
42%
3,574
18%
47%
2%
33%
3,535
19%
17%
24%
2%
54%
2%
3,037
18%
17%
23%
2%
55%
2%
2,252
19%
18%
20%
2%
57%
2%
5,493
27%
56%
17%
27%
62%
60%
12%
26%
2%
15%
24%
33%
27%
39%
72%
13%
8%
15%
42%
23%
54%
46%
56%
44%
4 5,358
-46
-0.85%
22%
38%
4%
33%
3,094
21%
53%
7%
19%
3,162
19%
18%
15%
1%
58%
7%
2,783
19%
17%
15%
1%
59%
6%
2,108
18%
17%
13%
1%
62%
6%
5,071
29%
60%
12%
22%
54%
62%
12%
20%
5%
10%
24%
33%
36%
43%
73%
11%
12%
16%
48%
13%
35%
65%
73%
27%
5 5,172
-232
-4.29%
19%
40%
2%
37%
3,523
17%
56%
0%
26%
3,776
15%
14%
22%
1%
62%
0%
3,318
15%
14%
22%
1%
64%
0%
2,653
14%
13%
19%
1%
67%
0%
4,885
26%
54%
20%
23%
69%
73%
9%
16%
3%
11%
20%
36%
33%
35%
72%
8%
15%
7%
42%
28%
71%
29%
44%
56%
Total
27,020
399

7.38%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
02/21/2022 14:22 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 15
I I
I
I
I
I
15 - 16
South Pasadena Redistricting 2022
NDC Teal ,"', .. , .. , ' , ', ~ ----,----------------,--------- -------( " I I I \ !', ~ I ,' : ~ ! ', \ I , I !,_\I I \ \ /' I '1l t I
\ \ , I /jj '
\ \ , I "t, ' \ I I '1l I
/ I / I ~ ~ ....
• I rn Q J
,,' 1 I 1~- ,
{ i I PASADENA FWY I~ \ I : u, }
I I ? / I 3 ro 1.., , I ._ •---, \
' I I Garfield Park \ ,, I I \
/ / I \
,' , , Mission St I \
/ / Orange Grove 1 ,
/ / Playground a,'---------, 4 \
I I > I Oxley St 1
, <i: I '~ / / C ,._,
,------ / '6 ' ,, ' -~ ,::!: l Mont~.r§Y~..9-------.l (' -.,::.!---------, ~ J(I) I ,----•=- \ I I -------, ,.----•-- 3 I .. --- I I g I I \ ,,,J rl-0 I J ► f,--------.J \
' 0\e(e'l I ' < • \ r - W1° ii"1 I (I) I \ ;5' I I \
1 <:>o/' I I \ '1' I I Eddie Park \ --i" : I I \
\\ I : \
I \ I \
I ' 2 I \ I ~ I \
I I ,------' \
'--., I \ \
I I \ s l ' I I I / I \ I
,,' 1 1 Huntington Dr 1
<.., I ,, r--------------'
-.-10 I ,.,, ~ ,I?" ' ,, ~'9°t \ I
~ .. , \ ,'
,} \ ',
I ' i I I
I I
I I
I I I
'----------------------------------------...!.. ______ .!. __ _l _____________________________ .J Water Area -- Railroad
Streets
©2021 CALIPER [::: Current Districts
NDC Teal
District 1
Total Pop 5,372
Deviation from ideal -32
% Deviation -0.59%
% Hisp 16.5%
% NH White 31%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 47%
Total 3,395
% Hisp 15%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 40%
Total 3,738
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 32%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 48%
% NH Black 6%
Total 3,275
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 31%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 48%
% NH Black 6%
Total 2,578
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 29%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 50%
% NH Black est. 6%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 4,929
age0-19 26%
age20-60 52%
age60plus 23%
immigrants 28%
naturalized 74%
english 63%
spanish 11%
asian-lang 24%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 14%
hs-grad 18%
bachelor 36%
graduatedegree 35%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 67%
income 0-25k 6%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 37%
income 200k-plus 37%
single family 72%
multi-family 28%
rented 34%
owned 66%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,408
4 0.07%
22%
32%
3%
40%
3,536
18%
48%
2%
32%
3,472
19%
18%
22%
2%
56%
1%
2,973
18%
17%
22%
2%
56%
2%
2,149
20%
18%
18%
2%
59%
1%
5,343
26%
56%
18%
27%
62%
59%
12%
26%
2%
15%
23%
33%
28%
38%
71%
13%
9%
14%
40%
23%
54%
46%
56%
44%
3 5,624
220

4.07%
24%
39%
3%
31%
3,780
19%
53%
5%
23%
3,641
21%
19%
15%
2%
58%
5%
3,158
20%
19%
15%
2%
59%
4%
2,156
20%
19%
13%
2%
59%
5%
5,377
24%
55%
21%
24%
55%
71%
10%
15%
4%
10%
21%
29%
39%
32%
70%
12%
11%
12%
45%
21%
50%
50%
54%
46%
4 5,444
40 0.74%
22%
37%
4%
33%
3,132
21%
53%
6%
19%
3,190
19%
18%
15%
1%
58%
7%
2,805
19%
17%
15%
1%
59%
6%
2,128
18%
17%
13%
1%
62%
6%
5,130
29%
59%
12%
22%
54%
62%
12%
20%
5%
10%
24%
33%
36%
42%
72%
11%
12%
16%
48%
13%
36%
64%
72%
28%
5 5,172
-232
-4.29%
19%
40%
2%
37%
3,523
17%
56%
0%
26%
3,776
15%
14%
22%
1%
62%
0%
3,318
15%
14%
22%
1%
64%
0%
2,653
14%
13%
19%
1%
67%
0%
4,885
26%
54%
20%
23%
69%
73%
9%
16%
3%
11%
20%
36%
33%
35%
72%
8%
15%
7%
42%
28%
71%
29%
44%
56%
Total
27,020
452

8.36%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
02/21/2022 14:25 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 17
I I
I
I
I
I
15 - 18
2 South Pasadena Redistricting 2022
NDC 103a
/ 0
,.:.P.:::: A:::: S.:;;: A:::. D.=. EN:..:A:..;__:_F.:..; Wc.,;Y_-=--""1~ Magnolia St
Mission St,-----~
I
El Gentro St
/
G)
ro
:::,
Cl.
0 :::,
"' ?
3 ) G)
Ol
::\,
iii
a:

Grevelia St {' (1)
Garfield Park
4 ~ '<
Monterey.J:R~d.._ __ ____, ___ ~
1,----------·
-------~
Lyndon St
©2021 CALIPER
~ 3
0 :,
Ol
{'
(1)
(l)
.i(
c
0 E
~
LL
Rollin St
Oak St
Laurel St
s:

Ol
(D
:::,
(0
0 ~ (1)
Eddie Park
5 Huntington o,...r __________ ..J
I Water Area I
-- Railroad
Streets
ID Public 1031
NDC 103a
District 1
Total Pop 5,607
Deviation from ideal 203
% Deviation 3.76%
% Hisp 24.8%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 30%
Total 3,958
% Hisp 21%
% NH White 49%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 25%
Total 3,695
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 20%
% Asian-Surnamed 15%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black 5%
Total 3,223
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 15%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 5%
Total 2,224
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 20%
% Asian-Surnamed 13%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black est. 5%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 5,728
age0-19 26%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 19%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 58%
english 70%
spanish 12%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 10%
hs-grad 21%
bachelor 29%
graduatedegree 39%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 71%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 23%
single family 49%
multi-family 51%
rented 55%
owned 45%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,449
45 0.83%
14%
29%
3%
52%
3,627
10%
44%
4%
42%
3,784
11%
11%
36%
1%
48%
4%
3,310
11%
10%
35%
1%
49%
5%
2,584
11%
11%
32%
1%
52%
5%
5,096
23%
53%
24%
28%
73%
64%
8%
26%
2%
14%
19%
34%
33%
36%
67%
6%
7%
9%
39%
39%
81%
19%
30%
70%
3 5,434
30 0.56%
24%
34%
3%
36%
3,164
21%
48%
3%
28%
3,400
20%
19%
19%
2%
56%
3%
2,895
20%
18%
18%
2%
57%
3%
2,095
21%
20%
15%
2%
58%
2%
4,884
26%
56%
18%
29%
61%
59%
14%
25%
2%
15%
22%
36%
28%
37%
69%
14%
11%
17%
40%
18%
46%
54%
60%
40%
4 5,358
-46
-0.85%
22%
38%
4%
33%
3,094
21%
53%
7%
19%
3,162
19%
18%
15%
1%
58%
7%
2,783
19%
17%
15%
1%
59%
6%
2,108
18%
17%
13%
1%
62%
6%
5,071
29%
60%
12%
22%
54%
62%
12%
20%
5%
10%
24%
33%
36%
43%
73%
11%
12%
16%
48%
13%
35%
65%
73%
27%
5 5,172
-232
-4.29%
19%
40%
2%
37%
3,523
17%
56%
0%
26%
3,776
15%
14%
22%
1%
62%
0%
3,318
15%
14%
22%
1%
64%
0%
2,653
14%
13%
19%
1%
67%
0%
4,885
26%
54%
20%
23%
69%
73%
9%
16%
3%
11%
20%
36%
33%
35%
72%
8%
15%
7%
42%
28%
71%
29%
44%
56%
Total
27,020
435

8.05%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
03/08/2022 14:03 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 19
I I
I
I
I
I
15 - 20
2 South Pasadena Redistricting 2022
G)
al
NDC 105a
:::J
C.
~ PASADEN~
Magaol.SI /
L,,~ /
1 J 7EICentroSt
(D
~
0 iii"
----------i3
Martos Dr
0 Q) l > r----i
3 ~;
~
0 c::
:::J
C.
(D
~
Lap Ortada St l OakSI
Laurel St
©2021 CALIPER
G)
Ill
:l,
co·
0:

Grevelia St t (D
Garfield Park
4 Monterey..!:R~d!..--------,;--~
~
Ill
ro
:::J
c.c
0 (D
~
Eddie Park
5 Huntington o,._ _________ _.1
Water Area
-- Railroad
Streets
D Public 105
NDC 105a
District 1
Total Pop 5,482
Deviation from ideal 78
% Deviation 1.44%
% Hisp 22.5%
% NH White 43%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian-American 28%
Total 3,566
% Hisp 15%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 22%
Total 3,629
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 15%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 3%
Total 3,149
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 15%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 3%
Total 2,143
% Latino est. 19%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 13%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 5,066
age0-19 23%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 24%
naturalized 53%
english 71%
spanish 10%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 9%
hs-grad 21%
bachelor 28%
graduatedegree 40%
Child in Household child-under18 31%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 68%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 45%
income 200k-plus 20%
single family 50%
multi-family 50%
rented 54%
owned 46%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,472
68 1.26%
19%
28%
3%
47%
3,550
19%
35%
6%
39%
3,657
16%
15%
31%
1%
45%
8%
3,173
16%
14%
31%
1%
46%
8%
2,472
15%
14%
28%
1%
48%
8%
5,035
26%
52%
23%
29%
76%
63%
12%
24%
2%
14%
17%
37%
35%
36%
68%
6%
11%
10%
36%
37%
70%
30%
35%
65%
3 5,257
-147
-2.72%
21%
29%
2%
45%
3,383
19%
44%
1%
36%
3,391
19%
18%
26%
2%
53%
1%
2,911
19%
17%
25%
2%
54%
1%
2,174
20%
18%
22%
2%
56%
1%
5,258
27%
57%
17%
27%
62%
61%
12%
25%
2%
15%
25%
33%
27%
39%
73%
12%
7%
15%
44%
21%
55%
45%
56%
44%
4 5,405
1 0.02%
22%
38%
4%
33%
3,116
21%
53%
6%
19%
3,173
19%
18%
15%
1%
58%
7%
2,791
19%
17%
15%
1%
59%
6%
2,115
18%
17%
13%
1%
62%
6%
5,103
29%
59%
12%
22%
54%
62%
12%
20%
5%
10%
24%
33%
36%
42%
72%
11%
12%
16%
48%
13%
35%
65%
73%
27%
5 5,404

0.00%
19%
42%
2%
35%
3,751
17%
58%
0%
25%
3,967
14%
13%
21%
1%
64%
0%
3,505
14%
13%
20%
1%
65%
0%
2,760
13%
13%
17%
1%
68%
0%
5,201
26%
54%
20%
23%
69%
72%
9%
17%
3%
11%
19%
36%
32%
36%
71%
9%
15%
8%
40%
29%
69%
31%
45%
55%
Total
27,020
225

4.16%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
03/08/2022 13:39 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 21
I I
I
I
I
I
15 - 22
South Pasadena Redistricting 2022
" Public _,-' ',, 109 I '
I ' © I ', ,-------r------------------T--- > --------------( ' I I I <( I I I' I I Q ., C I \ I' , 1 liver St o 1 1 1 ',
\ I / ~ I~ \ I ' \ I // CD I::,· \ I I
I \ ; CD 10 \j 1,
I \)> ;'' 1w 't
/) ~a ~ I / :
1< ~: ·-~~, ,,.... lo , l(D ' I I -, (
: f PASADENA FWY 4 \ I I \
I I I I I / ! I
/; ,' : ', / I '--------7 \ I I \
I I V ·. \
/ / Garfield Park \
/ ...... / " \
,,,, ,,,, / L _________ , \ I I ~ ' \ ,,I ,1 <( I \,
,..------/ / -~ : '"'\
1 / :g : Monterey Rd \
~,,...,...,, "'-=- -=-✓-~- 1 ----•--------------- ~ : 1 r - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - '~ - ... I ~---------·--7 r---------- I I \ , 1 I 3 1 Lyndon St : \
(""I tl-0 : } r1---------- \ - ~ dQ(\\ete'! I / I \ f I~' / I I \ 2 ,;'; : ! \\ , 1 South Pasadena High School \ , 1 I Eddie Park , I I I \
\ I I \ 1 , I South Pasadena Mid Sehl
,' ', I \\
I \ I \
I I I \ , / r------ \
..... ..._") I r~ '
/ ,' \% 5 ':
/ /I I :l I / \ .- I
/' I I ~ I I : .,..J <D r----------------'
... ,, cS ~-- ', I c: /
', \ ,9 I
', \ CJ / ' \ :§ / \ \ C: I
I I :f '-, ,.... I <.' I
I I
I I
I I
: I : I I I I
'---- - - - - - - - --- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' - - - - - - - .l_ - - .J.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _, Water Area
-- Railroad
Streets
©2 [-:_-:_: Current Districts 021 CALIPER
Public 109
District 1
Total Pop 5,395
Deviation from ideal -9
% Deviation -0.17%
% Hisp 24.9%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 31%
Total 3,771
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 47%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 25%
Total 3,498
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 15%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 57%
% NH Black 6%
Total 3,056
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 14%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black 6%
Total 2,079
% Latino est. 22%
% Spanish-Surnamed 20%
% Asian-Surnamed 13%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 57%
% NH Black est. 6%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 5,584
age0-19 26%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 19%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 60%
english 68%
spanish 14%
asian-lang 16%
other lang 3%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 11%
hs-grad 21%
bachelor 30%
graduatedegree 39%
Child in Household child-under18 33%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 73%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 11%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 21%
single family 45%
multi-family 55%
rented 58%
owned 42%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 5,505
101

1.87%
14%
29%
3%
52%
3,652
11%
44%
4%
42%
3,804
11%
11%
36%
1%
48%
4%
3,329
11%
10%
35%
1%
49%
5%
2,601
11%
11%
31%
1%
52%
5%
5,158
23%
53%
24%
28%
73%
64%
8%
26%
2%
14%
19%
34%
33%
36%
67%
6%
7%
9%
39%
39%
81%
19%
30%
70%
3 5,590
186

3.44%
24%
35%
3%
35%
3,326
19%
50%
2%
28%
3,577
21%
19%
18%
2%
57%
2%
3,043
20%
18%
18%
2%
58%
2%
2,223
20%
19%
15%
2%
60%
2%
4,966
26%
55%
19%
29%
59%
62%
13%
23%
3%
14%
22%
34%
30%
37%
67%
13%
10%
15%
41%
20%
52%
48%
56%
44%
4 5,358
-46
-0.85%
22%
38%
4%
33%
3,094
21%
53%
7%
19%
3,162
19%
18%
15%
1%
58%
7%
2,783
19%
17%
15%
1%
59%
6%
2,108
18%
17%
13%
1%
62%
6%
5,071
29%
60%
12%
22%
54%
62%
12%
20%
5%
10%
24%
33%
36%
43%
73%
11%
12%
16%
48%
13%
35%
65%
73%
27%
5 5,172
-232
-4.29%
19%
40%
2%
37%
3,523
17%
56%
0%
26%
3,776
15%
14%
22%
1%
62%
0%
3,318
15%
14%
22%
1%
64%
0%
2,653
14%
13%
19%
1%
67%
0%
4,885
26%
54%
20%
23%
69%
73%
9%
16%
3%
11%
20%
36%
33%
35%
72%
8%
15%
7%
42%
28%
71%
29%
44%
56%
Total
27,020
418

7.74%
21%
36%
3%
38%
17,366
18%
50%
4%
28%
17,817
17%
16%
22%
1%
56%
4%
15,529
17%
16%
21%
1%
57%
4%
11,664
17%
16%
19%
1%
60%
4%
25,664
26%
55%
19%
25%
63%
66%
11%
20%
3%
12%
21%
33%
34%
37%
70%
10%
11%
12%
43%
24%
56%
44%
53%
47%
03/08/2022 14:45 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
15 - 23
I I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT 2
Draft Ordinance
15 - 24
272076.1

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SOUTH PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A

CITY COUNCIL ELECTION DISTRICT MAP UNDER
ELECTIONS CODE SECTIONS 21600–21609
WHEREAS, the City of South Pasadena transitioned from at-large to by-district elections in October 2017;
WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt new district boundaries after each federal decennial census pursuant to a process called “redistricting” under Elections Code sections 21600–21609;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 21607.1, subdivisions (a)–(b), before the election district maps were drawn, the City Council held two public hearings on November 17, 2021 and January 19, 2022, to solicit feedback regarding communities of interest;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 21607.1, subdivisions (a)–(b), after the election district maps were drawn, the City Council held two public hearings on March 2, 2022 and March 16, 2022, to evaluate the draft maps; WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 21608, subdivision (a), the City took steps to encourage residents to participate in the redistricting public review process by making redistricting data and computer software accessible to members of the public for the purposes of drawing draft maps and providing training on that software;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 21608, subdivision (a), the City took additional steps to encourage residents to participate in the redistricting public review process by contacting community-based organizations, hosting virtual community workshops, mailing flyers to all residents of the City, and publishing notices and flyers through the City’s website and social media platforms; WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 21608, subdivision (a), the City took steps to encourage underrepresented communities and non-English speaking communities to participate in the redistricting public review process by translating the web page material into Spanish, Chinese, and Korean and making a live translator available upon request;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 21608, subdivision (d)(2), the City contracted with National Demographics Corporation for demographic consulting 15 - 25
272076.1
services which produced two draft maps that included information regarding total population, citizen voting age population, and racial and ethnic characteristics of the citizen voting age population of each proposed council district; WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 21608, subdivision (e), the public was able to submit testimony and draft maps in writing and electronically, and submitted a total of nine draft maps;
WHEREAS, the demographer revised two of the publicly submitted maps for further consideration;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code section 21608, subdivisions (f)–(g), the City created https://www.southpasadenaca.gov/government/redistricting, a web page for the redistricting process which includes or links to the following information: (1) a general explanation of the redistricting process for the City in English, Spanish, Chinese, and Korean; (2) the procedure for a member of the pubic to testify during a public hearing or to submit written testimony; (3) a calendar of all public hearings and workshop dates; (4) the notice and agenda for each public hearing and workshop; (5) the recording or written summary of each public hearing and workshop; (6) each draft map considered by the City Council at the public hearing; and (7) the adopted final map of council district boundaries;

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Ordinance by this reference.

SECTION 2. Redistricting Map. Commencing with the City’s next regular election in 2022, the map included as Attachment A shall serve as the new City Council election district map.

SECTION 3. District Boundaries. The City Clerk is directed to request the demographer provide a list of the census tracts and/or blocks for each district and to attach that list to this Ordinance as Attachment B.

SECTION 4. Controlling Authority. If there is a discrepancy between the adopted map in Attachment A and the list in Attachment B, the adopted map in Attachment A shall control.

SECTION 5. Web Page Maintenance. The City Clerk is directed to maintain the web page dedicated to redistricting listed above for a period of 10 years from the date of this Ordinance pursuant to Elections Code section 21608, subdivision (g). 15 - 26
272076.1
SECTION 6. Transmittal to County. The City Clerk is directed to provide a signed original of this Ordinance to the Elections Division of the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption pursuant to California Government Code Section 36937, subdivision (a).

SECTION 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The City hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.

SECTION 9. Certification and Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of South Pasadena, State of California, on this 6th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Christina Muñoz, Deputy City Clerk Andrew L. Jared, City Attorney 15 - 27
272076.1

ATTACHMENT A
District Map
To be added once map selected
15 - 28
272076.1

ATTACHMENT B
Census Tracts and/or Blocks
To be added once map selected
15 - 29
16 - 1
16 Ordinance Regarding Safe Storage of Firearms in Residences March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 5 ends

device with the transfer of every handgun. (18 USC 921(z)(1)). Neither law however requires the purchaser to actually use the device. Additional concern amongst some advocacy groups is that the California firearm storage law only applies to homes where children live or where “a child is likely to gain access to the firearm.” (CA Penal Code section 25100).

Analysis
Proposed Ordinance
The Safe Storage of Firearms Ordinance requires all firearms in residences to be securely stored in a Department of Justice (DOJ) approved locked container or disabled with a DOJ-approved firearm safety device, unless being carried on the person or within the immediate control of the owner/authorized user. The ordinance defines a “locked container” as a secured container on the DOJ list of approved storage devices. A locking device is any device on the DOJ list of approved devices that when applied to the firearm, renders the firearm inoperable.

There are currently 2,077 storage and safety devices on the Department of Justice approved safe gun storage list. (https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/certified-safetydevices/search). Storage devices can be purchased for as low as $40, and trigger locks are often distributed for free at police stations. In May 2021, the South Pasadena Police Department offered these free locking devices to firearm owners upon request.

The locking requirements under the Safe Storage of Firearms Ordinance apply only to firearms that are not being carried on the person or in the person’s immediate control.

Therefore, firearm owners may carry loaded and unlocked firearms in the home at any time if kept in the owner/authorized user’s immediate control. The safe storage requirements allow owners to store firearms loaded if they choose.

On September 13, 2021, the Public Safety Commission (PSC) defined the term “person’s immediate control,” by adding the term “within arms-reach.” The PSC determined that immediate control was open to interpretation by the homeowner. The arms-reach clarified standards is based on Fourth Amendment search procedures used by law enforcement. A safety search for weapons can be conducted of a suspect’s arms-reach area where a weapon may be hidden. The PSC believed this term added to the ordinance narrowed down the homeowner’s control of the weapon.

The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed ordinance and provided amendments to strengthen enforcement and address clarity as to control over the firearm. Further, the ordinance has been amended to clarify the locking devices are those specified under the Department of Justice safety device list. The amendment also changes the term “trigger lock” for “locking device” to allow those devices on the DOJ-approved list that do not involve the trigger to be used, such as a cable lock or chamber lock. 16 - 2
Ordinance Regarding Safe Storage of Firearms in Residences March 16, 2022

Page 3 of 5 ends

Comparable Ordinances
At least 37 cities across California have enacted similar ordinances imposing storage requirements when the firearm is in a residence regardless of the presence of a child or other person not legally able to possess a gun. Los Angeles, Cudahy, Culver City and San Marino are the closest in proximity. Staff contacted 16 of the cities that adopted the ordinance. Of those cities contacted, representatives indicated the ordinances are used as an educational tool and the California Penal Code is used for prosecution.

It was also noted by the PSC that a safe storage ordinance had been upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal (Jackson v. City and County of San Francisco (2014) 764 F.3D 953, 965). Two provisions of the San Francisco ordinance were challenged, the specific challenge that required a firearm to be stored in a locked container or secured with a locking device. The Ninth Circuit held that the law was an impermissible infringement of the Second Amendment. It allowed persons to possess firearms in their homes secured when not under their control. The Supreme Court chose not to hear the case in 2015.

As to the storage requirement, the court held that the City had shown that the requirement that a person store firearms in a locked storage container or with a trigger lock when not carried on the person is substantially related to the important government interest of reducing firearm-related deaths and injuries. The city had shown an important government interest of preventing firearms from being stolen and reducing the number of hand-gun related suicides and deadly domestic violence incidents. The court further held that such storage requirements does not substantially prevent law-abiding citizens from using firearms to defend themselves, but merely regulates how residence must store their handguns when not carrying them on their persons. Such regulation was held to still allow a handgun to be readily accessed in the case of an emergency, and still allowed residents to defend their home by carrying firearms on their person.

Important Government Interests
According to the Gun Violence Archive data, gun violence killed nearly 20,000 Americans in 2020, more than any other year in at least two decades. Suicides account for 6 out of 10 firearm-related deaths. An additional 24,000 people died by suicide and accidental deaths by firearms. Last year, the United States saw the highest one-year increase in homicides within the country’s largest cities, including the City of Los Angeles. Los Angeles suffered a 30 percent spike in shooting deaths. For non-fatal shootings, the numbers are significantly higher. According to the Brady Institute, approximately 114,000 people are shot each year in the U.S. Of those, almost 8,000 are 17 years old or younger.

Firearm purchases in 2020 soared with a record-setting number. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, people purchased about 23 million guns in 2020, which signifies a 64 percent increase over 2019 sales. The compounded effects of the COVID19 pandemic hampered anti-crime efforts, and the consequent shutdowns and stay-athome orders led to a significant rise in unemployment and homicide rates. According to a Washington Post analysis of gun sales in 2021, gun purchases skyrocketed almost 16 - 3
Ordinance Regarding Safe Storage of Firearms in Residences March 16, 2022

Page 4 of 5 ends

80% in January (Denham & Tran, 2021,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/02/03/gun-sales-january-backgroundchecks/). The effort to reduce the spread of COVID-19 led to food shortages, millions of lost jobs, and empty streets. Additionally, amid waves of civil unrest across the country, a significant increase in firearms sales occurred in the weeks after massive protests throughout the nation. According to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the flood of gun sales recorded in 2020 included more than 8 million first-time buyers.

According to data obtained in 2021 by the Gun Violence Archive, nearly 300 children were shot and killed in 2020, a 50 percent increase from the previous year. More than 5,100 kids and teens 17 and younger were killed or injured last year – an increase that is particularly alarming because it occurred in a year when most children were not attending class in person. Experts believe this points to the severity of teen suicide and domestic violence.

Given these risks, and the limitations on state and federal laws concerning storage of firearms, the attached ordinance is presented to address these issues within the City of South Pasadena.

Enforcement
A City ordinance may be enforced criminally as provided in SPMC Chapter 1 – General Provisions, Section 1.7 – General penalty; continuing violations:

Whenever in this code or in any other ordinance of the city, any act is prohibited or is made or declared to be unlawful or an offense, or the doing of any acts is required or the failure to do any act is declared to be unlawful or a misdemeanor, where no specific penalty is provided for, the violation of any such provision of this code or any other ordinance of the city shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars or imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

Every day any violation of this code or any other ordinance of the city shall continue shall constitute a separate offense (Ord. No. 1983, § 1).

A representative from the Alhambra District Attorney’s Office indicated that the filing of criminal charges based on the municipal code would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Administrative citations, misdemeanor citations, and civil enforcement would be filed by the City Prosecutor.

Fiscal Impact
The costs associated with community education, outreach, or prosecution under this ordinance would be absorbed through the police department’s existing outreach plan consisting of the Public Safety Commission, social media, neighborhood watch, and community groups.
16 - 4
Ordinance Regarding Safe Storage of Firearms in Residences March 16, 2022

Page 5 of 5 ends

Commission Review and Recommendation
This matter was reviewed by the Public Safety Commission. The Commission unanimously recommends that the City Council approve the ordinance.

Public Noticing
A Public Hearing Notice was published March 4, 2022 in the South Pasadena Review.

Attachments:

1. Ordinance SPMC Chapter 20F

2. California Penal Codes 25100 and 23635

Resources:

Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America https://momsdemandaction.org/ Gun Violence Archive https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/ 16 - 5
ATTACHMENT 1
City Ordinance Chapter 20F “Safe Storage of
Firearms in Residences”
16 - 6

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
ORDINANCE NO.________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA, CALIFORNIA,
ADDING CHAPTER 20F “SAFE STORAGE OF
FIREARMS IN RESIDENCES” TO THE SOUTH

PASADENA MUNICIPAL CODE

WHEREAS, firearm injuries have a significant public health impact both nationally and locally; and
WHEREAS, the Gun Violence Archive data indicates that in 2020, more than 20,000 people persons died from firearm-related injuries in the United States; and WHEREAS, in 2020, firearms were used in 24,000 suicides or accidental deaths in the United States; and
WHEREAS, in 2020, the United States saw the highest one-year increase in homicides; and
WHEREAS, having a loaded or an unlocked firearm in the home is associated with an increased risk of gun-related injury and death; and WHEREAS, while children are particularly at risk of injury and death, or causing injury and death, when they can access firearms in their own homes or homes that they visit, injury and death can occur whenever a firearm is kept unlocked or outside of an unlocked storage container; and
WHEREAS, more than two-thirds of school shooters obtain their guns from their own home or that of a relative; and
WHEREAS, research shows that while most mass shootings involve handguns, shootings involving rifles contribute to higher casualty counts; and WHEREAS, hundreds of thousands of firearms are stolen from homes and vehicles of legal gun owners each year and flow into the underground market; and WHEREAS, applying trigger locks or using lockboxes when storing firearms in the home reduces the risk of firearm injury and death and is associated with a reduction of unintentional firearm deaths and decreases in suicides among children and teens; and
16 - 7
WHEREAS, the California Penal Code 25100 (2010) address the issue of criminal storage of a firearm regarding children in the home, it does not apply to all homes; and
WHEREAS, keeping a firearm locked or stored in a locked container when it is not being carried prevents unauthorized users, including children, from accessing and using firearms, which can reduce tragedies due to suicide, unintentional discharges, and firearm theft; and
WHEREAS, safe storage measures have a demonstrated protective effect in homes with children and teenagers where firearms are stored; and WHEREAS, there is a broad consensus among medical professionals, gun control advocates, and gun rights groups that applying trigger locks or using lockboxes to store unsupervised firearms in the home promotes health and safety; and
WHEREAS, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that, if families must have firearms in their homes, the firearms should be stored locked, unloaded, and separate from locked ammunition; and
WHEREAS, requiring firearms to be stored in a locked container, with trigger locks or with a locking device does not substantially burden the right or ability to use firearms for self-defense in the home; and
WHEREAS, the locking requirements apply only to firearms that are not being lawfully carried and allow gun owners and adults over 18 years of age to carry loaded and unlocked firearms in the home at any time; and
WHEREAS, firearms can be safely stored in and quickly accessed from affordable, widely available lockboxes, including those with easily operable combination devices or biometric locks; and
WHEREAS, portable lock boxes can store loaded firearms such that they are within easy reach in closets, under the bed, or on tables or nightstands.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 20F Safe Storage of Firearms in Residences is added to the South Pasadena Municipal Code in its entirety to read as follows:
16 - 8
Chapter 20F Safe Storage of Firearms in Residences
20F-1. Definitions.

1. Firearm means a firearm as defined in California Penal Code, Section 16520, as amended from time to time.

2. Locked container means a secure container that is fully enclosed and locked that is listed on the California Department of Justice’s roster of approved firearm safety devices and that is identified as appropriate for that firearm by reference to either the manufacturer and model of the firearm or to the physical characteristics of the firearm that match those listed on the roster for use with the device under Penal Code Section 23655(d).

3. Residence means any structure intended or used for human habitation, including, but not limited to, houses, condominiums, apartments, rooms, accessory dwelling units, motels, hotels, single room occupancies, timeshares, and recreational and other vehicles where human habitation occurs.

4. Locking device means a locking device that is listed on the California Department of Justice’s roster of approved firearm safety devices and that is identified as appropriate for that firearm by reference to either the manufacturer and model of the firearm or to the physical characteristics of the firearm that match those listed on the roster for use with the device under Penal Code Section 23655(d).
20F-2 Prohibition. No person shall keep a firearm within a residence unless the firearm is:

1. Stored in a locked container or disabled with a locking device that has been approved by the California Department of Justice; or

2. Carried on the person of the owner, or other lawfully authorized user of the firearm who is over the age of 18, in a manner to allow such person to retrieve and control the use of the firearm, in accordance with all applicable laws; or

3. Within arms-reach proximity of the owner, or other lawfully authorized user of the firearm who is over the age of 18, to allow such person to readily retrieve and physically control the use of the firearm, as if carried on the 16 - 9
person. Arms-reach refers to the area of physical control an individual has over the firearm from a standing, or seated position without moving from such position.

4. An exemption for this section shall apply if the firearm owner is a peace officer or a member of the Armed Forces or the National Guard using the firearm during, or incidental to, the performance of the person’s official duties.
20F-3 Penalty. Every violation of this Section shall constitute a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed six months, or by both. 20F-4 Severability. If any provision of this Section is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, that invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Section which can be implemented without the invalid provisions, and to this end, the provisions of this Section are declared to be severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Section and each provision thereof irrespective of whether any one or more provisions are found invalid, unconstitutional, or otherwise unenforceable.

SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Code amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b)(3), which states the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final passage, the City Clerk of the City of South Pasadena shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and its approval by the Mayor and City Council and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper in the manner required by law.

16 - 10
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON this 6th day of April, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Michael A. Cacciotti, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christina A. Muñoz Andrew L. Jared, City Attorney
Deputy City Clerk
16 - 11
ATTACHMENT 2
California Penal Codes 25100 and 23635
16 - 12
16 - 13
16 - 14
17 - 1
17 In-lieu Fee
March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 9 ends

C. Inclusionary ownership (for sale) units shall be provided at the moderate income level.

Units produced as deed-restricted affordable units are available only to eligible renters based on qualifying income levels. The State and County set rent levels to ensure that tenants do not overpay for housing. For affordable ownership units, the sales price is based on income and takes all housing costs into consideration. Tables produced by the County specify allowable costs for a range of household sizes and income levels. Table 1 below provides an example of the maximum allowable rents for a 3-person household at very low, low and moderate income levels and the purchase price for a moderate income unit if purchased by a household at 120% of the area median income (AMI).

Table 1: Maximum Housing Costs for 3-Person Household
The inclusionary ordinance intentionally encourages developers to provide affordable units on-site. Projects that provide on-site units are eligible for density bonuses as required by the state, as well as other project bonuses that are granted for achieving the community’s priority for consistent design and high-quality architecture to contribute to the City’s high-quality physical environment, as defined by objective criteria in the ordinance.

Using a density bonus, a 3-unit project could provide the on-site affordable unit as a fourth unit, and a 4-unit project could provide a total of five units. Such projects would be entitled to concessions that might make it more attractive for a developer to build the unit, depending on the characteristics of the individual project.

Income Category % of AMI
Adjusted Annual
3-Person HH
Income [1]
Total Max
Annual
Spending on
Housing [2]
Annual
Spending on
Other Housing
Costs [3]
Maximum
Affordable
Sale Price [4]
Very Low (Rental) 50% $53,200 $15,960 $2,748 $1,101 N/A Low (Rental) 80% $85,200 $25,560 $2,748 $1,901 N/A
Moderate (Rental) 120% $86,400 $25,920 $2,748 $1,931 N/A Moderate (For Sale) 120% $86,400 $25,920 $8,400 $1,460 $362,000 [2] Assumes a housing cost to income ratio of 30 percent.

Maximum Aff.

Monthy Rent or
Mortgage
Payment [4]
[1] HUD adjusts the maximum incomes for very-low and low-income households in Los Angeles County up by 148%. This type of adjustment is made in counties with unusually high or low household incomes, uneven housing cost-to-income ratios, or other considerations. [3] For rental units, other housing costs include utility expenditures consistent with the Los Angeles County CDA limits for a 2-bedroom unit (assumes use of electricity for heating and cooking). Utility costs effective July 2021. For for-sale units, other housing costs include estimated property taxes, homeowners insurance, and homeowner association (HOA) fees. [4] Maximum income available to pay for rent or mortgage and interest after allowance for other housing costs. [5] Affordable sale price is based on a 30-year mortgage with 10% downpayment and 3.5% annual interest rate.

Sources: Los Angeles County Community Development Authority; California Housing and Community Development; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
17 - 2
In-lieu Fee
March 16, 2022

Page 3 of 9 ends

Alternative Compliance – In-lieu Fee
The ordinance offers alternative means of compliance with the inclusionary housing requirement, and certain projects may choose the option of paying an in-lieu fee:

SPMC 36.375.050.D (Fractional Units): The applicant may choose to “Pay the fractional amount above the whole number as an in-lieu fee equivalent to the fraction multiplied by the in-lieu fee as established by City Council resolution. All whole number units shall be provided on site or alternatively as allowed in SPMC 36.375.060 (Alternatives to On-Site Provision).”
SPMC 36.375.060.A: “For rental projects of three or four units or for any ownership project: payment of an in-lieu fee as established by City Council resolution and updated from time to time as deemed appropriate, subject to the provisions of SPMC 36.375.110 (In-Lieu Fee Payment and Administration).” The ordinance also includes language to guide how the fee is calculated:

SPMC 36.375.110.B (In-Lieu Fee Payment and Administration) specifies the applicability of the in-lieu fee and states: “The in-lieu fee shall be established in an amount that is equivalent to the cost of providing a comparable unit for each unit that would have been provided in the project based on the requirements of this section.”
These ordinance provisions directed the consultants’ work in developing assumptions and factors to calculate the fee.

Establishment of this in-lieu fee is not subject to the State Mitigation Fee Act, as it is not an impact fee that is proposed as an exaction to receive project approval but rather is offered as an option that may be chosen by the applicant.

The Council authorized funding for the in-lieu fee study following adoption of the inclusionary housing ordinance and approved a contract with Economic and Planning Systems (EPS) to perform the research and provide recommendations. The project kickoff meeting was held in November 2021. EPS produced a memo that outlines the methodology and assumptions that have resulted in their financing gap analysis, which is included as Attachment 1 to this report. Following Council’s discussion and direction tonight, the final recommendation memo will be completed and included in the staff report packet for a public hearing.

The in-lieu fee must be adopted by Council at a public hearing, which would be noticed as required by law, and scheduled following this discussion. Although fee adoptions do not require a recommendation from the Planning Commission, staff will agendize this topic for discussion at an upcoming Planning Commission Meeting. Staff will share the comments from the discussion at the Commission meeting at the future City Council adoption hearing, to be scheduled.
17 - 3
In-lieu Fee
March 16, 2022

Page 4 of 9 ends

Analysis
The inclusionary housing in-lieu fee is limited in its applicability, as described above.

Therefore, EPS constructed the draft fees to reflect the specific circumstances in which they would be applied as an alternative to providing fractional units in rental projects. This includes projects with 3 or 4 units, which require less than one unit, because with a 20% requirement, a full unit is not required unless the project has at least 5 units (20% x 3 units = .6 units; 20% x 4 units = .8 units). For ownership projects, the fee would be applicable to both whole and fractional units. Due to the differences between rental and ownership projects in the construction costs, financial inputs, tax implications and required affordability levels, separate fees were constructed for each housing type.

Characteristics of the units for purposes of determining costs were based on a review of projects planned, under construction, or built in South Pasadena and in similar jurisdictions in the County. EPS collected data on cap rates, land costs, building costs, and other inputs from multiple sources as identified in Attachment 1.

Financing Gap
As a proxy to address the Code’s requirement that the fee be equivalent to the cost of providing a comparable unit, EPS calculated the difference between the cost of developing a prototype housing unit and the sales price (ownership) or value (rental) to show that gap that the developer would finance, or would not finance if a fee were paid in-lieu of providing the unit. When paid as an in-lieu fee and allocated to an affordable housing developer to finance the unit in another location, the funding would serve to close the feasibility gap for the same number of units that were not provided on-site in the project.

The numbers in red on the last line of the table below represent the gap for one affordable unit, assuming a typically-sized project for either a rental or ownership project, with variations for the affordability levels (very low, low or moderate). Once determined, this number is translated into a cost-per-affordable-square-foot based on the prototype unit size for the modeled affordable units.

The following table shows the financing gap for a very low income, low income, and moderate income unit for a rental project, and for a moderate income unit for an ownership project. It should be noted that the components for ownership and rental projects differ, leading to a difference between the financing gaps that were calculated for rental and ownership moderate income units, as explained in more detail in Attachment 1. For rental units, LA County’s formula raises the maximum allowable rent (MAR) for Low Income units based on the regional housing market, and coupled with tax benefits that are not available to developers of moderate income units. Skewing the results such that the low income financing gap is actually lower than the moderate income gap. 17 - 4
In-lieu Fee
March 16, 2022

Page 5 of 9 ends

Table 2: Financing Gap
In-lieu Fee Alternatives: Rental Unit Projects
As described above, the required affordability level for an on-site unit depends on the project size. In no case will the developer pay the full unit cost in Table 2, as only fractional unit requirements may be met through payment of the in-lieu fee. In the case of a rental project with three or four units, the developer had the option of including a unit at any affordability level. In the case of larger projects that would have required two or more affordable units, if the fraction was over an even number unit (for example, 2.3), the fractional unit eliminated would be for a very-low income household. If the fractional number was over an odd number (for example, 3.6), the eliminated unit would be for a low-income household.

Based on the financing gaps in Table 2, the Table 3 provides the potential fees, expressed as cost per square foot of the average affordable unit size of 1,000 square feet, per the formula below.

The first column shows the option of setting the fee at an average of all levels for projects up to 10 units that have all options. Column 2 calculates an average that might be applicable to projects with 11+ units that are required to provide low and very-low income units. Fractions would be calculated as appropriate, and the table below provides two Rental Project In-Lieu Fee Formula
Fractional Unit Required x Average Sq. Ft. of Market-Rate Units x Per Sq.

Ft. Subsidy
17 - 5
In-lieu Fee
March 16, 2022

Page 6 of 9 ends

examples (.6 and .8) which also correspond to the in-lieu fees for 3- and 4-unit projects.

Fees would be estimated at the time of entitlement but finalized based on the building permit plans.

Table 3: Rental Project Fee Alternatives (1,000 sf Average Unit Size) Finance Gap 1: Average
Gap for all
levels

2. Average
Low/Very
Low
3: Very Low
Gap
4: Low Gap 5: Moderate
Gap
Fee: $/sf $351 $369 $489 $249 $315
3-unit project:
.6 x fee
$210,600 $221,400 $293,400 $149,400 $189,000
4-unit project:
.8 x fee
$280,800 $295,200 $391,200 $199,200 $252,000
Notes Generalized
for 3-10 unit
projects that
have options
at all levels.

Generalized
for 11+ unit
projects to
even out the
VL/L income
requirement.

Will produce
the most
income for
Affordable
Housing
Trust Fund
Results in
lowest fee,
due to LA
County MAR
adjustments
Assumes
that on-site
developer
would
choose to
build one
moderate
unit.
[Note: 5-unit projects (or project size of any multiple of five) cannot opt for the in-lieu fee, as the 20% requirement will calculate to a whole number with no fraction.] In-lieu Fee Alternatives: Ownership Unit Projects
Unlike rental projects, ownership projects have the option to pay a fee in-lieu on all or part of their on-site inclusionary housing requirement. For this reason, the financing gap for ownership units was only analyzed at the moderate income level. A moderate income unit must be sold to a qualified buyer within a range up to 120% of area median income (AMI). The gap shown in Table 1 ($226,000) was calculated using the top of that range, in other words the buyer able to afford at the highest end of the range. However, a qualified buyer may have an income within the range but not at the top. For comparison and Council’s consideration, EPS also separately calculated the unit financing gap assuming a buyer with an income at 110% AMI, which came to $271,000.

The ownership project pro forma is based on a gross unit size of 1,200 square feet.

Accordingly, the full unit financing gap is divided by 1,200 square feet to get the fee in $/sf. The fee formula for ownership projects is shown below. 17 - 6
In-lieu Fee
March 16, 2022

Page 7 of 9 ends

Alternatives for establishing the ownership in-lieu fee are summarized below in Table 4.

The fee for a 1,200 square foot ownership project is shown along with a 1,000 squarefoot rental project.

Table 4: Ownership Project Fee Alternatives
Moderate Range 1. 120% AMI 2. 110% AMI
Fee: $/sf $188.34 $225.84
Fee/unit: Project w/ 1,000 sf
average unit size: (Rental)
$188,340 $225,840
Fee/unit: Project w/ 1,200 sf
average unit size (Owner)
$226,008 $271,008
In-lieu fees collected from ownership projects would reflect the financing gap for moderate units; however, it is most likely that, once in the Affordable Housing Trust Fund, the funds will go toward financing low or very low income units, as most non-profit housing developers build low or very-low income units. Many cities base their fees for ownership projects on the 110% AMI scenario, and this is a matter of Council preference and objectives.

Comparison to Other Jurisdictions
Cities can take a variety of approaches to calculate inclusionary housing in-lieu fees. As explained on the website of the Grounded Solutions Network (www.inclusionaryhousing.org)
“Each jurisdiction must determine how to set their fee level. There are several common approaches, but no single “right” formula. A key factor that shapes the decision about which formula to use is whether a jurisdiction wants to encourage on-site performance or collect the revenue to leverage other sources of funding to build affordable units off site.

All other things being equal, the higher the fee, the higher the chance that developers will choose to build units on site. A number of communities have made the mistake of setting in-lieu fees far below the cost of on-site 17 - 7
In-lieu Fee
March 16, 2022

Page 8 of 9 ends

performance, and this practice has resulted in poor overall performance of the affordable housing program.”
As stated above, South Pasadena’s ordinance indicates the City’s preference for on-site affordable housing, and the fee is recommended to be relatively high for this reason. For a point of comparison, staff reviewed the fees that have been established in several other Los Angeles County jurisdictions that were also compared when the inclusionary housing ordinance was reviewed and adopted. Several of these have increased their in-lieu fees over the past year. Pasadena, Alhambra, Glendale and Santa Monica have adopted fees based on the project’s total market-rate square footage. West Hollywood, which only allows in-lieu fees as an alternative for projects of 10 units or less that require one unit, has a graduated flat fee based on the project’s number of units. Pasadena, Alhambra and Santa Monica have a higher fee for ownership projects than for rental projects.

Glendale and West Hollywood have one fee applicable to all project tenure types.

Table 5 below compares the fees and shows a total fee based on a project with 20 units.

The cities included in this table charge the in-lieu fee by multiplying it by the total square footage in the market-rate project and not the average unit size. To compare with the figures provided above, the total fees for 1,000 square-foot rental units and 1,200 squarefoot ownership units are calculated. Actual fees would differ from project to project based on unit size and the gross floor area defined for city’s calculations.

For West Hollywood, the 3- and 4-unit project fees are provided to compare with equivalent South Pasadena rental and ownership projects opting to pay the in-lieu fee.

West Hollywood’s full (highest) fee, for a 10-unit project, is $439,192, while smaller projects are treated as fractional units.

Table 5: Comparison of Other Cities’ In-Lieu Fees
Per sf (see
Table
Notes)
Fee in lieu of
one unit
(rental)
Per sf (see
Table Notes)
Fee in lieu of one
unit (for-sale)
Alhambra $14.30 $95,333.33 $30.00 $240,000.00
Glendale $49.50 $330,000.00 $49.50 $396,000.00
Pasadena $50.92 $254,600.00 $52.43 $314,580.00
Santa Monica $35.50 $236,666.67 $41.47 $331,760.00
West Hollywood N/A N/A
(3-unit project) $131,758.00 $131,758.00
(4-unit project) $175,677.00 $175,677.00
(10-unit project) $439,192.00 $439,192.00
17 - 8
In-lieu Fee
March 16, 2022

Page 9 of 9 ends

TABLE 4 NOTES:
• Total Fee in-lieu of one unit: The comparison cities calculate the in-lieu fee as one amount for the project, but for an equivalent comparison, the total fee is divided by the number of units that would have been required.
• Other cities’ fees are per square foot based on gross residential floor area • South Pasadena’s fee is per square foot based on average unit size. • Comparison based on highest fee for jurisdictions with complex, variable fee structures Recommendation and Alternatives
Council has the option to set the fee as it sees fit to be consistent with the intent of the inclusionary housing ordinance. Following discussion, it is recommended that Council direct staff to prepare the fee resolution. Alternatives for fee levels include the following, or another direction if Council prefers:
• A single fee for all projects,
• A single fee for rental projects and a single fee for ownership projects o Direction on AMI basis for ownership projects
• A single fee for ownership projects and:
o Rental project fees differentiated by size (Up to 10 units and 11+ units) o And/or: Rental project fees for 11+ units differentiated by whether the fraction represents a unit that would have been Low Income or would have been Very Low Income
Fiscal Impact
There is no immediate fiscal impact from this discussion item. The establishment of the in-lieu fee, based on Council’s direction in this discussion, will impact the City’s newly established affordable housing trust fund over time as projects opt to pay the fee instead of building whole or fractional units as described in this report.

Next Steps
April 12, 2022: Presentation to Planning Commission for discussion and comments May 4, 2022: Council hearing to adopt the in-lieu fee resolution Attachment: In-Lieu Fee Study Gap Analysis Memo by EPS
17 - 9
ATTACHMENT 1
Attachment: In-Lieu Fee Study Gap Analysis
Memo by EPS
17 - 10

M EMORANDUM
I ntroduction
The City of South Pasadena (City) adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance in May 2021. The ordinance requires that a minimum of 20 percent of the total number of dwelling units in a residential or mixed-use development consisting of more than two units be provided at below-market-rate prices affordable to Very-Low, Low, and/or Moderate-income households, based on income standards established by the State of California’s Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The ordinance allows, under certain circumstances, for development projects to pay an in-lieu fee as an alternative to providing required units. These circumstances include any for-sale project, which can pay an in-lieu fee instead of building on-site affordable units; as well as some rental projects, which have the option to pay an in-lieu fee for any fractional affordable units required as an alternative to rounding up to the next whole number of units.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) was hired by the City to calculate an appropriate inclusionary housing in-lieu fee rate to charge in such instances. This memorandum describes EPS’s estimates of the subsidy necessary to support the construction of the affordable housing units that are not being built onsite. This subsidy, or “financing gap” associated with the development of affordable units, will form the basis of the in-lieu fee calculation for the City’s inclusionary housing program.

To: Angelica Frausto-Lupo and Liz Bar-El, City of South Pasadena
From: Julie Cooper, Thomas Gonzales, and Darin Smith,
Economic & Planning Systems
Subject: South Pasadena Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study Financing Gap Analysis; EPS #214034
Date: February 23, 2022
17 - 11
Memorandum: South Pasadena Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study Financing Gap Analysis February 23, 2022
Page | 2
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) \\EgnyteDrive\epsys\Shared\Projects\LA\214000s\214034_South Pasadena IHP In-Lieu Fee\Report\214034 So Pasadena In-Lieu Fee_Affordability Gap Analysis_EPS Memorandum.docx
Financing Gap Analysis
Product Prototypes
The analysis assumes that the collected in-lieu fees would be used to subsidize the production of lower-income units similar to the type of residential development currently observed in the City. The prototype residential products used in the analysis were informed by research completed for the City’s Housing Element Update on average residential sizes and construction costs, as well as interviews with local developers, and were approved by City staff to utilize in this analysis.

The assumptions for the prototype products are summarized in Table 1. As shown, the rental product prototype is a two-bedroom, 1,000 net square-foot apartment unit, developed at a density of 55 units per acre. The analysis also assumes the development of structured parking to serve the units, at a ratio of one space per two-bedroom unit.

The for-sale product prototype is a two-bedroom, 1,200 square foot townhome unit with attached parking, developed at a density of 20 units per acre.

Table 1 Affordable & Market Rate Unit Prototype Characteristics Maximum Affordable Housing Rents
Income levels for affordable housing units are set for the County of Los Angeles by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on an annual basis. Table 2 shows the income limits for 2021 for a three-person household, as this analysis assumes the 2-bedroom unit prototypes are occupied by a 3-person household.1 The Area Median Income (AMI) for a family of three in Los Angeles County is $72,000 in 2021. For the Low and Very-Low income groups, the maximum incomes do not correspond mathematically to the AMI due to HCD adjustment factors within Los Angeles County. For example, the “Low” income group would nominally represent households earning up to 80 percent of median income, but due to the HCD adjustment factor, the resulting “Low” income maximum is nearly 20 percent above the median income. HCD makes these adjustments to “Low” and “Very Low” income standards in counties with 1 Based on California Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5.

Product Type Construction Type Density Unit Size Unit Sq. Ft. Parking Type For Sale Townhome 20/du acre 2 Bedroom 1,200 sq. ft. Attached garage Rental Wood Frame
Apartment Building
55/du acre 2 Bedroom 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per unit
(structured)
17 - 12
Memorandum: South Pasadena Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study Financing Gap Analysis February 23, 2022
Page | 3
\\EgnyteDrive\epsys\Shared\Projects\LA\214000s\214034_South Pasadena IHP In-Lieu Fee\Report\214034 So Pasadena In-Lieu Fee_Affordability Gap Analysis_EPS Memorandum.docx Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
relatively high housing costs and/or relatively high or low household incomes. HCD does not apply these adjustment factors to the Moderate-income group.

Table 2 2021 Household Income Limits for Los Angeles County Consistent with City ordinance, the analysis assumes that households spend no more than 30 percent of their gross annual income on total housing costs. For rental units, this includes rent and utilities.2 Spending on utilities is subtracted from spending on total housing costs to determine the maximum rent that a household can pay in a year. For for-sale units, housing costs include mortgage principal and interest, property taxes, and homeowners insurance payments (collectively, “PITI”), plus annual Homeowners Association (HOA) fees. After subtracting taxes, insurance, and HOA fees from a household’s maximum affordable housing costs budget, the remaining budget was used to calculate a maximum affordable house purchase price, based on common mortgage term assumptions.3
For the purposes of the financing gap analysis, EPS used maximum income levels of 50 percent of AMI (“Very-Low income”), 80 percent of AMI (“Low-income”), and 120 percent of AMI (“Moderate income”), consistent with the City’s inclusionary ordinance definitions on the maximum incomes allowed for each income category. As summarized on Table 3, a three-person Very-Low income household earning 50 percent of AMI (adjusted) can pay up to $1,101 per month for a two-bedroom rental unit; a Low-income household earning 80 percent of AMI (adjusted) can pay $1,901 per month; and a Moderate-income household earning 120 percent of AMI can pay $1,931 per month. These affordable rents are far below the market-rate rent for a newly constructed unit of the same size in South Pasadena, which EPS estimates at $3,900 per month.

For for-sale units, a three-person Moderate-income household earning 120 percent of AMI can pay up to $1,460 on monthly mortgage payments (principal and interest), which 2 The utility allowance for a two-bedroom unit is based on a schedule published by the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) (https://www.lacda.org/docs/librariesprovider25/publicdocuments/utility-allowance/ua-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=47bb66bc_4) 3 Assumes a 30-year fixed mortgage with a 3.5 percent effective interest rate, plus a 10 percent down payment from the homebuyer.

Income Group and Definition
2021 Maximum Income
3-Person Household
Very Low >30% to ≤50% AMI + HUD adjustment [1] $53,200
Low >50% to ≤80% AMI + HUD adjustment [1] $85,150
Median (Base) >80% to ≤100% AMI $72,000
Moderate >100% AMI to ≤120% AMI $86,400
HUD Adjustment Factor for Very Low & Low Income Groups 147.8% [1] HUD applies adjustments to the amounts based on unusually high or low family income, uneven housing-cost-to income relationship, or other reasons.

Source: Los Angeles County 2021 Income Limits, California Housing and Community Development (HCD). 17 - 13
Memorandum: South Pasadena Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study Financing Gap Analysis February 23, 2022
Page | 4
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) \\EgnyteDrive\epsys\Shared\Projects\LA\214000s\214034_South Pasadena IHP In-Lieu Fee\Report\214034 So Pasadena In-Lieu Fee_Affordability Gap Analysis_EPS Memorandum.docx
translates into a maximum purchase price of $362,000 for a two-bedroom townhome unit.4 EPS estimates that a newly constructed market-rate unit of the same size could achieve a sale price of $912,000 in South Pasadena.

Table 3 Maximum Affordable Monthly Housing Costs for Three-Person Household in Los Angeles County
Development Cost Assumptions
Residential development costs include land costs, direct or “hard” costs (e.g., labor and materials), and indirect or “soft” costs (e.g., architecture, entitlement, fees, marketing, etc.). Land cost estimates used in the analysis are based on data from recent land transactions in South Pasadena, and reflect the fact that land zoned for multifamily housing tends to have higher market prices than land zoned for single-family or townhome housing. Other development cost estimates are derived from EPS interviews with housing developers both within South Pasadena and the larger Los Angeles region. A developer fee is also estimated and represents the compensation to the developer for their efforts, investment, and risk. These assumptions are shown on Table 4 and Table 5 and indicate that the total cost per unit is about $670,000 for rental apartments and $588,000 for for-sale townhomes. Again, these figures represent “prototypical” projects; the actual costs for a given project will vary by location and project design characteristics.

Revenue Assumptions
To calculate the value of the affordable units, several revenue-related assumptions were made regarding applicable income levels and the percentage of household income that can be put towards housing costs, including rent. In addition, translating a revenue 4 This calculation is further detailed in Table 5 below.

Income Category % of AMI
Adjusted Annual
3-Person HH
Income [1]
Total Max
Annual
Spending on
Housing [2]
Annual
Spending on
Other Housing
Costs [3]
Maximum
Affordable
Sale Price [4]
Very Low (Rental) 50% $53,200 $15,960 $2,748 $1,101 N/A Low (Rental) 80% $85,200 $25,560 $2,748 $1,901 N/A
Moderate (Rental) 120% $86,400 $25,920 $2,748 $1,931 N/A Moderate (For Sale) 120% $86,400 $25,920 $8,400 $1,460 $362,000 [2] Assumes a housing cost to income ratio of 30 percent.

Sources: Los Angeles County Community Development Authority; California Housing and Community Development; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Maximum Aff.

Monthy Rent or
Mortgage
Payment [4]
[1] HUD adjusts the maximum incomes for very-low and low-income households in Los Angeles County up by 148%. This type of adjustment is made in counties with unusually high or low household incomes, uneven housing cost-to-income ratios, or other considerations. [3] For rental units, other housing costs include utility expenditures consistent with the Los Angeles County CDA limits for a 2-bedroom unit (assumes use of electricity for heating and cooking). Utility costs effective July 2021. For for-sale units, other housing costs include estimated property taxes, homeowners insurance, and homeowner association (HOA) fees. [4] Maximum income available to pay for rent or mortgage and interest after allowance for other housing costs. [5] Affordable sale price is based on a 30-year mortgage with 10% downpayment and 3.5% annual interest rate. 17 - 14
Memorandum: South Pasadena Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study Financing Gap Analysis February 23, 2022
Page | 5
\\EgnyteDrive\epsys\Shared\Projects\LA\214000s\214034_South Pasadena IHP In-Lieu Fee\Report\214034 So Pasadena In-Lieu Fee_Affordability Gap Analysis_EPS Memorandum.docx Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
estimate into a total value per rental unit estimate required assumptions for operating expenses and capitalization rates. The following assumptions were used:
• Income Levels—The analysis estimates the subsidy required to produce units for three-person households at 50 percent AMI, 80 percent AMI, and 120 percent AMI for rental units, and 120 percent AMI for for-sale units, as shown above in Table 3. • Percentage of Gross Household Income Available for Housing Costs—The City’s inclusionary housing ordinance indicates that lower-income households should pay no more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing costs. EPS calculated the rents and sale prices that each income category would be able to pay net of other housing-related costs (e.g. utilities, insurance and taxes, HOA fees). • Operating Costs for Rental Units—The analysis assumes that affordable apartment operators incur annual operating costs of $6,000 per unit on units affordable to Lowand Very-low income households, which include the cost of management, maintenance, and common utilities (those not paid by tenants). These operating costs assume that all affordable apartments constructed for Very-Low and Low-income households would be exempt from property taxes, as allowed by State law. Rental units for moderate-income households would not be exempt from property taxes, and the operating costs for these units were adjusted up accordingly. • Capitalization Rate—A capitalization rate represents the rate of return that an investor in a real estate project expects to receive, and generally indicates the project’s relative risk (e.g. a lower capitalization rate suggests that a project is less risky, and therefore an investor is willing to accept a lower rate of return because the return is more guaranteed). The value of a project is calculated by dividing the net operating income (NOI) by the capitalization rate. For the rental prototypes, EPS utilized a capitalization rate of 4.0 percent.5
Financing Gap Results
Table 4 shows the subsidies required for construction of rental apartments for threeperson households at Very-Low, Low-, and Moderate-income levels (50 percent, 80 percent, and 120 percent of AMI, respectively, adjusted as appropriate). As shown, such units are estimated to cost approximately $670,000 to develop. The estimated operating income from those units at affordable rents would translate to values well below those development costs, ranging from $181,000 to $421,000. Based on this analysis, a unit affordable to a Very-Low household would require a subsidy of approximately $489,000; a unit affordable to a Low-income household would require a subsidy of approximately 5 Based on H1 2021 cap rate surveys for infill multifamily development in the Los Angeles region, published by CBRE, a real estate services firm (https://www.cbre.com/insights/reports/us-cap-ratesurvey-h1-2021) 17 - 15
Memorandum: South Pasadena Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study Financing Gap Analysis February 23, 2022
Page | 6
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) \\EgnyteDrive\epsys\Shared\Projects\LA\214000s\214034_South Pasadena IHP In-Lieu Fee\Report\214034 So Pasadena In-Lieu Fee_Affordability Gap Analysis_EPS Memorandum.docx
$249,000; and a unit affordable to a Moderate-income household would require a subsidy of approximately $315,000.6
Table 5 shows the subsidies required for construction of for-sale townhome units affordable to three-person households earning Moderate-income levels (120 percent of AMI). As shown, these households could afford to pay up to roughly $362,000 for a home, while such homes are estimated to cost approximately $588,000 to build. Based on this analysis, building such a unit would require a subsidy of $226,000.

It would also be possible to calculate the subsidy needed for Moderate-income units based on a maximum income level of 110 percent of AMI. Using income levels somewhat below the top of the income range (which is 120 percent of AMI for Moderate-income households) is common practice in financing gap analysis for affordable in-lieu fee calculations, as it allows more households to qualify for and afford such units. If the analysis were to use 110 percent of AMI (or $79,200 for a three-person household) as the maximum income level for Moderate-income households, the resulting maximum affordable sales price would be $317,000. Such a unit would require a subsidy of approximately $271,000.

As referenced in the Introduction to this memo, these subsidies will form the basis of the in-lieu fee calculations for the City’s inclusionary housing program. These calculations will be detailed in a future technical memorandum.
6 The subsidy for units affordable to Moderate-income households is higher than that for Low-income households due to higher operating expenses for Moderate-income units (which are not property taxexempt) and the similarity between maximum incomes for both affordability levels (due to the adjustment up of Low-income levels as explained in Table 3).
17 - 16
Memorandum: South Pasadena Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study Financing Gap Analysis February 23, 2022
Page | 7
\\EgnyteDrive\epsys\Shared\Projects\LA\214000s\214034_South Pasadena IHP In-Lieu Fee\Report\214034 So Pasadena In-Lieu Fee_Affordability Gap Analysis_EPS Memorandum.docx Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Table 4 Financing Gap Pro Forma Analysis for Prototype Rental Unit Affordable to VeryLow, Low-, and Moderate-Income Households Very Low Income
(50% AMI)
Low Income
(80% AMI)
Moderate Income
(120% AMI)
Prototype Unit Assumptions
Density/Acre 55 55 55
Gross Unit Size 1,176 1,176 1,176
Net Unit Size [1] 1,000 1,000 1,000
Number of Bedrooms 2 2 2
Number of Persons per Unit [2] 3 3 3
Parking Spaces/Unit [3] 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cost Assumptions
Land/Unit [4] $4,750,000 /Acre $86,364 $86,364 $86,364
Direct Costs
Direct Construction Costs/Unit [5] $375 /Net Sq. Ft. $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 Parking Construction Costs/Unit $50,000 /Space $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Subtotal, Direct Costs/Unit $425,000 $425,000 $425,000
Indirect Costs/Unit [6] 18% of direct costs $76,500 $76,500 $76,500 Land + Direct + Indirect Cost Subtotal (before Developer Fee) $587,864 $587,864 $587,864 Developer Fee (rounded) 14% of all costs $82,000 $82,000 $82,000 Total Cost/Unit (rounded) $670,000 $670,000 $670,000
Maximum Supported Home Price
Household Income [7] $53,200 $85,200 $86,400
Revenue to Property Owner/Year [8] $13,212 $22,812 $23,172 (less) Operating Expenses per Unit/Year [9] ($6,000) ($6,000) ($9,000) Net Operating Income $7,212 $16,812 $14,172
Capitalization Rate [10] 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
Total Unit Value [11] $181,000 $421,000 $355,000
Affordability Gap ($489,000) ($249,000) ($315,000)
3-4 Stories
Woodframe Multifamily Building
with Garage Parking
[2] For this analysis, EPS has assumed an average unit for income-qualified worker households would be 2-bedrooms. State law (Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5) indicates that a 2-bedroom unit should be assumed to be occupied by a 3-person household. [3] Assumption of 1.0 parking spaces/unit is consistent with the City's steamlined density bonus requirements for projects including affordable housing units.
[4] Land value assumption based on data from CoStar on recent sales transactions in South Pasadena and conversations with local developers for projects of similar density.
[5] Cost assumptions include both laborand materials and are based on estimates from private developers active in South Pasadena and other parts of the region. EPS experience is that costs to develop affordable housing units are typically the same or higher than to develop market rate units [6] Includes estimated costs for architecture and engineering; entitlement and fees; project management; appraisal and market study; marketing, commissions, and general administration; financing and charges; insurance; developer fee and contingency. Based on analysis of South Pasadena's Housing Element and EPS discussions with local developers. [9] Estimated operating expenses for affordable rental units is based of EPS discussions with affordable housing developers and operators working in Southern California. Operating expenses for Very-Low and Low-Income units do not include property tax. [10] The capitalization rate is used to determine the current value of a property based on estimated future operating income, and is typically a measure of estimated operating risk. The capitalization rate used in this analysis is based on CBRE U.S. Cap Rate Study, First Half 2021 for Los Angeles market.

Input Assumptions
[1] Net usable space is based on an assumed efficiency ratio of 85%. [7] Based on 2021 income limits for a three-person household in Los Angeles County. [8] Assumes housing costs (e.g., rent and utilities) to be no more than 30% of gross household income. [11] The total supportable unit value is determined by dividing the net operating income by the capitalization rate.

Sources: Los Angeles County; California Housing and Community Development; CBRE; and Economic & Planning Systems 17 - 17
Memorandum: South Pasadena Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee Study Financing Gap Analysis February 23, 2022
Page | 8
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) \\EgnyteDrive\epsys\Shared\Projects\LA\214000s\214034_South Pasadena IHP In-Lieu Fee\Report\214034 So Pasadena In-Lieu Fee_Affordability Gap Analysis_EPS Memorandum.docx
Table 5 Financing Gap Pro Forma Analysis for Prototype For-Sale Unit Affordable to Moderate Income Households
Townhome with
Attached Garage
Moderate Income
(120% AMI)
Prototype Unit Assumptions
Density/Acre 20
Gross Unit Size 1,200
Number of Bedrooms 2
Number of Persons per Unit [1] 3
Parking Spaces/Unit Attached garage
Cost Assumptions
Land/Unit [2] $3,300,000 /acre $165,000
Direct Construction Costs/Unit [3] $225 /net sq. ft. $270,000 Indirect Costs/Unit [4] 30% of direct costs $81,000
Developer Fee (rounded) 14% of all costs $72,000
Total Cost/Unit (rounded) $588,000
Maximum Supported Home Price
Household Income [5] $86,400
Maximum Monthly Housing Payment [6] $2,160
Other Housing Costs
Insurance $125
Taxes [7] $275
HOA Fee $300
Maximum Monthly Mortgage Payment (after Other Housing Costs) $1,460 Mortgage Terms
Down Payment 10%
Interest Rate (annual) 3.50%
Loan Term (months) 360
Total Supportable Unit Value [8] $362,000
Affordability Gap ($226,000)
Input Assumptions
[5] Based on 2021 income limits for a three-person household in Los Angeles County. [7] Taxes equal to approximately 1.1% of sale price.
[6] Assumes housing costs to be 30% of gross household income. Maximum monthly payment for affordable units is inclusive of mortgage payment, insurance, and taxes.

Sources: Los Angeles County; California HCD; Economic & Planning Systems [8] The total supportable unit value is equivalent to the down payment plus total mortgage amount, assuming a mortgage with terms for interest rate, term, and payment as shown in table. [4] Includes estimated costs for architecture and engineering; entitlement and fees; project management; appraisal and market study; marketing, commissions, and general administration; financing and charges; insurance; developer fee and contingency.
[3] Cost assumptions include both labor and materials and are based on estimates from private developers active in South Pasadena and other parts of the region. EPS experience is that costs to develop affordable housing units are typically the same or higher than to develop market rate units. [2] Estimate based on data from CoStar and local developers for projects of similar density. [1] For this analysis, EPS has assumed an average unit for income-qualified worker households would be 2- bedrooms. State law (Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5) indicates that a 2-bedroom unit should be

17 - 18
18 - 1
18 Letter of Support to Elected Officials Regarding Catalytic Converter Recycling March 16, 2022

Page 2 of 4 ends

The quantities of these metals vary by model, however on average, one catalytic converter contains approximately 1-2 grams of rhodium, 2-7 grams of palladium, and 3- 7 grams of platinum. At the time of this report, the market value of rhodium is $16,950 per ounce, palladium is valued at $2,361 per ounce, and platinum is valued at $1,052 per ounce.

Catalytic converter thefts are challenging for law enforcement agencies to investigate due to the lack of serial numbers or other identifying markers on or within each unit.

Currently, under California law, a police officer who encounters an individual in possession of a catalytic converter under suspicious circumstances must locate the rightful owner before making an arrest for theft or possession of stolen property. If the officer is unable to identify the rightful owner, the person in possession of the catalytic converter may be released absent additional evidence of criminal activity.

Police departments across the nation, including South Pasadena, have promoted "Etch and Catch" events where residents can have their identification information etched into the catalytic converters to help identify the owners if found in possession of criminals.

However, there are simply not enough events or resources available to make this a viable, long-term solution. Even with these efforts, thefts have continued to spike. To curb the rising thefts and ease prosecution requirements, several cities across the state have adopted municipal ordinances that make the possession of a catalytic converter without proper documentation a misdemeanor. While this does make proving the elements of the crime easier, it still requires a willing prosecution team to file and pursue criminal charges.

Several states have enacted legislation aiming to stifle rouge-recycling entities by requiring proof of ownership when purchasing catalytic converters, better documentation, fingerprinting, photographing, and stringent reporting requirements.

Unfortunately, despite leading the nation in thefts, California has fallen far behind other states in these efforts. The current legislation does not address the lack of resources, necessary funding, alternative strategies to curb the rising thefts, or lack of prosecution.

It also fails to dissuade the operations of criminal recycling enterprises with burdensome fines or penalties.

Analysis
On February 2, 2022, in response to the recent increase in catalytic converter thefts, the City Council requested the matter be discussed by the Public Safety Commission and that the Commission provide a recommendation regarding a letter to be sent to state elected officials, including Senator, Assemblymember, Governor, and Attorney General.

The proposed letter urges lawmakers for enhanced legislation to further address the illegal operations within the scrap metal and recycling industries occurring throughout the state concerning the recycling and processing of catalytic converters.

The drafted letter of support encompasses the following:
18 - 2
Letter of Support to Elected Officials Regarding Catalytic Converter Recycling March 16, 2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

1. A request to establish a task force or Blue Ribbon committee to meet and hear testimony from key stakeholders before the end of the year.

2. Express support for Senate Bill 919 (SB 919), Vehicles: catalytic converters.

SB 919 would:
a. Require new and used motor vehicle dealers to permanently mark the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) on the catalytic converter of any vehicle before they sell it.
b. Allow metal recyclers to only buy catalytic converters with a clearly visible and untampered VIN. They also would have to maintain detailed records of the seller for each specific catalytic converter and make those records accessible to law enforcement.
c. Require sales documentation on catalytic converters, as well as increasing fines, intended to discourage theft.

3. Express support for Senate Bill 366 (SB 366), which extended the operation of California's Vehicle Dismantling Strike Team. The Strike Team is a multiagency collaborative effort under the purview of the California Department of Motor Vehicles with the mission of enforcing regulatory laws related to unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantling, including tax evasion, environmental, and public health impacts.

4. Express support for Assembly Bill 1653 (AB 1653) amending Penal Code sec. 13899, and requires the California Highway Patrol to organize a regional property crimes task force to assist local law enforcement having elevated levels of property crime, including, but not limited to, organized retail theft, vehicle burglary, and theft of vehicle parts and accessories. The task force shall provide local law enforcement in the identified region with logistical support and other law enforcement resources, including, but not limited to, personnel and equipment.

5. Express support for Assembly Bill 1659 (AB 1659), amending section 220 of the Vehicle Code to change the definition of an auto dismantler to anyone who keeps two or more used catalytic converters that are not attached to a motor vehicle.

The Bill includes making it a crime for a person to act as an automobile dismantler without having an established place of business and having a current, valid license.

Fiscal Impact
There is no measurable fiscal impact associated with approving this letter of support.

Commission Review and Recommendation
The Public Safety Commission reviewed the item at the February 14, 2022 Regular Meeting and voted 5-0 in support of drafting a letter to elected officials regarding enhanced legislation around catalytic converter recycling.

Attachments:

1. Letters to Elected Officials

2. Senate Bill 919
18 - 3
Letter of Support to Elected Officials Regarding Catalytic Converter Recycling March 16, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

3. Senate Bill 366

4. Assembly Bill 1653

5. Assembly Bill 1659

6. Weekly Crime Summary
18 - 4
ATTACHMENT 1
Letters to be Sent to Elected Officials
18 - 5

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
1414 MISSION STREET, SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
TEL: (626) 403-7210 ▪ FAX: (626) 403-7211
March 16, 2022
Governor Gavin Newsom
1021 O Street, Suite 9000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Governor Newsom:

The City of South Pasadena would like to express support for enhanced legislation to further address and deter the illegal operations within the scrap metal and recycling industries throughout the state concerning the recycling and processing of catalytic converters. As you may know, catalytic converter theft has increased exponentially not only within California but throughout the entire country. State Farm Insurance recently released data that revealed an increase of almost 300% for claims nationwide between 2020 and 2021.

The rise in thefts can be largely attributed to the value of the precious metals within the catalytic converters, including rhodium, palladium, and platinum. Criminals remove the catalytic converter from the vehicle relatively quickly and easily with the use of a reciprocating saw. They can then transport the parts to a scrap metal dealer or recycler, making between $50 and $250 per unit. It can often cost the owner of the vehicle thousands of dollars to replace the catalytic converter, including parts, labor, and alternative transportation expenses due to vehicle downtime.

The State of California’s existing legislation does not address the necessary funding and strategies to curb the rising number of thefts, along with lack of prosecution. Under current California law, a police officer encountering an individual in possession of a catalytic converter under suspicious circumstances must be able to identify the rightful owner in order to make an arrest for theft or possession of stolen property.

To address these concerns, the City of South Pasadena would like to respectfully support several legislative options. First, the City requests that a task force or Blue Ribbon committee be established to hear testimony from key stakeholders before the end of the year. South Pasadena would also like to formally offer support for Senate Bill 919, which would require new and used motor vehicle dealers to permanently mark the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) on the catalytic converter of any vehicle before it is sold. Senate Bill 919 would also allow metal 18 - 6
Governor Gavin Newsom
March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

recyclers to only purchase catalytic converters with a clearly visible, untampered VIN. Recyclers would also be required to maintain detailed sales documentation and records of the seller for each catalytic converter, along with making those records accessible to law enforcement.

Additionally, the Bill would increase fines and assist in deterring future thefts.

The City also supports Senate Bill 366, Assembly Bill 1653, and Assembly Bill 1659 to further attempt to curb catalytic converter thefts. Senate Bill 366 would extend the operation of California’s Vehicle Dismantling Strike Team, which is a multiagency collaborative effort under the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles. The Strike Team focuses on unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantling associated with tax evasion and impacts related to the environment and public health. Assembly Bill 1653 amends Penal Code section 13899 and requires the California Highway Patrol to organize a regional property crimes task force to assist local law enforcement where levels of property crime are elevated. This task force would cover organized retail theft, vehicle burglary, and theft of vehicle parts and accessories. Assembly Bill 1659 would change the definition of an auto dismantler to anyone who keeps two or more used catalytic converters that are not attached to a vehicle. The Bill makes it a crime for a person to act as an auto dismantler without having an established place of business and a current business license.

California currently leads the nation in catalytic converter thefts yet is far behind other states in terms of legislation to help curtail these thefts. We urge you to support the above-listed legislation and the creation of a task force or Blue Ribbon Committee to address the current epidemic of catalytic converter thefts affecting residents of the state of California.

Sincerely,
Michael A. Cacciotti
Mayor, City of South Pasadena
cc:

Attorney General Rob Bonta
State Senator Anthony J. Portantino
State Assemblymember Chris R. Holden
18 - 7

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
1414 MISSION STREET, SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
TEL: (626) 403-7210 ▪ FAX: (626) 403-7211
March 16, 2022
Attorney General Rob Bonta
California Department of Justice
Attn: Public Inquiry Unit
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Dear Attorney General Bonta:

The City of South Pasadena would like to express support for enhanced legislation to further address and deter the illegal operations within the scrap metal and recycling industries throughout the state concerning the recycling and processing of catalytic converters. As you may know, catalytic converter theft has increased exponentially not only within California but throughout the entire country. State Farm Insurance recently released data that revealed an increase of almost 300% for claims nationwide between 2020 and 2021.

The rise in thefts can be largely attributed to the value of the precious metals within the catalytic converters, including rhodium, palladium, and platinum. Criminals remove the catalytic converter from the vehicle relatively quickly and easily with the use of a reciprocating saw. They can then transport the parts to a scrap metal dealer or recycler, making between $50 and $250 per unit. It can often cost the owner of the vehicle thousands of dollars to replace the catalytic converter, including parts, labor, and alternative transportation expenses due to vehicle downtime.

The State of California’s existing legislation does not address the necessary funding and strategies to curb the rising number of thefts, along with lack of prosecution. Under current California law, a police officer encountering an individual in possession of a catalytic converter under suspicious circumstances must be able to identify the rightful owner in order to make an arrest for theft or possession of stolen property.

To address these concerns, the City of South Pasadena would like to respectfully support several legislative options. First, the City requests that a task force or Blue Ribbon committee be established to hear testimony from key stakeholders before the end of the year. South Pasadena would also like to formally offer support for Senate Bill 919, which would require new and used 18 - 8
Attorney General Rob Bonta
March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

motor vehicle dealers to permanently mark the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) on the catalytic converter of any vehicle before it is sold. Senate Bill 919 would also allow metal recyclers to only purchase catalytic converters with a clearly visible, untampered VIN. Recyclers would also be required to maintain detailed sales documentation and records of the seller for each catalytic converter, along with making those records accessible to law enforcement.

Additionally, the Bill would increase fines and assist in deterring future thefts.

The City also supports Senate Bill 366, Assembly Bill 1653, and Assembly Bill 1659 to further attempt to curb catalytic converter thefts. Senate Bill 366 would extend the operation of California’s Vehicle Dismantling Strike Team, which is a multiagency collaborative effort under the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles. The Strike Team focuses on unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantling associated with tax evasion and impacts related to the environment and public health. Assembly Bill 1653 amends Penal Code section 13899 and requires the California Highway Patrol to organize a regional property crimes task force to assist local law enforcement where levels of property crime are elevated. This task force would cover organized retail theft, vehicle burglary, and theft of vehicle parts and accessories. Assembly Bill 1659 would change the definition of an auto dismantler to anyone who keeps two or more used catalytic converters that are not attached to a vehicle. The Bill makes it a crime for a person to act as an auto dismantler without having an established place of business and a current business license.

California currently leads the nation in catalytic converter thefts yet is far behind other states in terms of legislation to help curtail these thefts. We urge you to support the above-listed legislation and the creation of a task force or Blue Ribbon Committee to address the current epidemic of catalytic converter thefts affecting residents of the state of California.

Sincerely,
Michael A. Cacciotti
Mayor, City of South Pasadena
cc:

Governor Gavin Newsom
State Senator Anthony J. Portantino
State Assemblymember Chris R. Holden
18 - 9

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
1414 MISSION STREET, SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
TEL: (626) 403-7210 ▪ FAX: (626) 403-7211
March 16, 2022
State Senator Anthony J. Portantino
601 East Glenoaks Blvd., Suite 210
Glendale, CA 91207
Re: SB 366 Catalytic Converters - SUPPORT
Dear Senator Portantino:

The City of South Pasadena would like to express support for enhanced legislation to further address and deter the illegal operations within the scrap metal and recycling industries throughout the state concerning the recycling and processing of catalytic converters. As you may know, catalytic converter theft has increased exponentially not only within California but throughout the entire country. State Farm Insurance recently released data that revealed an increase of almost 300% for claims nationwide between 2020 and 2021.

The rise in thefts can be largely attributed to the value of the precious metals within the catalytic converters, including rhodium, palladium, and platinum. Criminals remove the catalytic converter from the vehicle relatively quickly and easily with the use of a reciprocating saw. They can then transport the parts to a scrap metal dealer or recycler, making between $50 and $250 per unit. It can often cost the owner of the vehicle thousands of dollars to replace the catalytic converter, including parts, labor, and alternative transportation expenses due to vehicle downtime.

The State of California’s existing legislation does not address the necessary funding and strategies to curb the rising number of thefts, along with lack of prosecution. Under current California law, a police officer encountering an individual in possession of a catalytic converter under suspicious circumstances must be able to identify the rightful owner in order to make an arrest for theft or possession of stolen property.

To address these concerns, the City of South Pasadena would like to respectfully support several legislative options. First, the City requests that a task force or Blue Ribbon committee be established to hear testimony from key stakeholders before the end of the year. South Pasadena would also like to formally offer support for Senate Bill 919, which would require new and used 18 - 10
State Senator Anthony J. Portantino
Re: SB 366 Catalytic Converters - SUPPORT
March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

motor vehicle dealers to permanently mark the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) on the catalytic converter of any vehicle before it is sold. Senate Bill 919 would also allow metal recyclers to only purchase catalytic converters with a clearly visible, untampered VIN. Recyclers would also be required to maintain detailed sales documentation and records of the seller for each catalytic converter, along with making those records accessible to law enforcement.

Additionally, the Bill would increase fines and assist in deterring future thefts.

The City also supports Senate Bill 366, Assembly Bill 1653, and Assembly Bill 1659 to further attempt to curb catalytic converter thefts. Senate Bill 366 would extend the operation of California’s Vehicle Dismantling Strike Team, which is a multiagency collaborative effort under the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles. The Strike Team focuses on unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantling associated with tax evasion and impacts related to the environment and public health. Assembly Bill 1653 amends Penal Code section 13899 and requires the California Highway Patrol to organize a regional property crimes task force to assist local law enforcement where levels of property crime are elevated. This task force would cover organized retail theft, vehicle burglary, and theft of vehicle parts and accessories. Assembly Bill 1659 would change the definition of an auto dismantler to anyone who keeps two or more used catalytic converters that are not attached to a vehicle. The Bill makes it a crime for a person to act as an auto dismantler without having an established place of business and a current business license.

California currently leads the nation in catalytic converter thefts yet is far behind other states in terms of legislation to help curtail these thefts. We urge you to support the above-listed legislation and the creation of a task force or Blue Ribbon Committee to address the current epidemic of catalytic converter thefts affecting residents of the state of California.

Sincerely,
Michael A. Cacciotti
Mayor, City of South Pasadena
cc:

Governor Gavin Newsom
Attorney General Rob Bonta
State Assemblymember Chris R. Holden
18 - 11

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
1414 MISSION STREET, SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
TEL: (626) 403-7210 ▪ FAX: (626) 403-7211
March 16, 2022
State Assembly Member Chris R. Holden
600 N. Rosemead Blvd., Suite 117
Pasadena, CA 91107
Re: AB 1653 and AB 1659 Catalytic Converters - SUPPORT
Dear Assemblymember Holden:

The City of South Pasadena would like to express support for enhanced legislation to further address and deter the illegal operations within the scrap metal and recycling industries throughout the state concerning the recycling and processing of catalytic converters. As you may know, catalytic converter theft has increased exponentially not only within California but throughout the entire country. State Farm Insurance recently released data that revealed an increase of almost 300% for claims nationwide between 2020 and 2021.

The rise in thefts can be largely attributed to the value of the precious metals within the catalytic converters, including rhodium, palladium, and platinum. Criminals remove the catalytic converter from the vehicle relatively quickly and easily with the use of a reciprocating saw. They can then transport the parts to a scrap metal dealer or recycler, making between $50 and $250 per unit. It can often cost the owner of the vehicle thousands of dollars to replace the catalytic converter, including parts, labor, and alternative transportation expenses due to vehicle downtime.

The State of California’s existing legislation does not address the necessary funding and strategies to curb the rising number of thefts, along with lack of prosecution. Under current California law, a police officer encountering an individual in possession of a catalytic converter under suspicious circumstances must be able to identify the rightful owner in order to make an arrest for theft or possession of stolen property.

To address these concerns, the City of South Pasadena would like to respectfully support several legislative options. First, the City requests that a task force or Blue Ribbon committee be established to hear testimony from key stakeholders before the end of the year. South Pasadena would also like to formally offer support for Senate Bill 919, which would require new and used 18 - 12
State Assembly Member Chris R. Holden
Re: AB 1653 and AB 1659 Catalytic Converters - SUPPORT
March 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

motor vehicle dealers to permanently mark the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) on the catalytic converter of any vehicle before it is sold. Senate Bill 919 would also allow metal recyclers to only purchase catalytic converters with a clearly visible, untampered VIN. Recyclers would also be required to maintain detailed sales documentation and records of the seller for each catalytic converter, along with making those records accessible to law enforcement.

Additionally, the Bill would increase fines and assist in deterring future thefts.

The City also supports Senate Bill 366, Assembly Bill 1653, and Assembly Bill 1659 to further attempt to curb catalytic converter thefts. Senate Bill 366 would extend the operation of California’s Vehicle Dismantling Strike Team, which is a multiagency collaborative effort under the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles. The Strike Team focuses on unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantling associated with tax evasion and impacts related to the environment and public health. Assembly Bill 1653 amends Penal Code section 13899 and requires the California Highway Patrol to organize a regional property crimes task force to assist local law enforcement where levels of property crime are elevated. This task force would cover organized retail theft, vehicle burglary, and theft of vehicle parts and accessories. Assembly Bill 1659 would change the definition of an auto dismantler to anyone who keeps two or more used catalytic converters that are not attached to a vehicle. The Bill makes it a crime for a person to act as an auto dismantler without having an established place of business and a current business license.

California currently leads the nation in catalytic converter thefts yet is far behind other states in terms of legislation to help curtail these thefts. We urge you to support the above-listed legislation and the creation of a task force or Blue Ribbon Committee to address the current epidemic of catalytic converter thefts affecting residents of the state of California.

Sincerely,
Michael A. Cacciotti
Mayor, City of South Pasadena
cc:

Governor Gavin Newsom
Attorney General Rob Bonta
State Senator Anthony J. Portantino
18 - 13
ATTACHMENT 2
Senate Bill 919
18 - 14
SENATE BILL No. 919
Introduced by Senator Jones
February 3, 2022
An act to add Section 21610.1 to the Business and Professions Code, and to add Sections 10851.7 and 24020 to the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 919, as introduced, Jones. Vehicles: catalytic converters. (1)  Existing law licenses and regulates motor vehicle dealers and retail sellers. Existing law prohibits a motor vehicle dealer or retail seller from selling any motor vehicle that is not in compliance with the requirements enumerated in the Vehicle Code.

This bill would prohibit a dealer or retail seller from selling a motor vehicle equipped with a catalytic converter unless the catalytic converter has been engraved, etched, or otherwise permanently marked with the vehicle identification number of the vehicle to which it is attached.

This bill would also prohibit any person, except as exempted, from removing, altering, or obfuscating the vehicle identification number engraved, etched, or otherwise marked on a catalytic converter.

A violation of these provisions would be punishable as a misdemeanor.
(2)  Existing law prohibits the buying or receiving of stolen property, as specified. Existing law prohibits the removal from a vehicle of any part without the consent of the owner.

This bill would prohibit the purchase, sale, receipt, or possession of a stolen catalytic converter, as specified. The bill would specify that a peace officer need not have actual knowledge that the catalytic converter is stolen to establish probable cause for arrest, and that in a prosecution

99 18 - 15
of the section, circumstantial evidence may be used to prove the stolen nature of the catalytic converter.

A violation of this prohibition would be punishable as either a felony or a misdemeanor, as specified.
(3)  Existing law requires a core recycler that accepts, ships, or sells used catalytic converters to maintain specified information regarding the purchase and sale of the catalytic converters. Existing law requires a core recycler to provide this information for inspection by local law enforcement upon demand. A violation of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor.

This bill would prohibit a core recycler from purchasing or otherwise receiving any catalytic converter that is not engraved, etched, or otherwise permanently marked with the vehicle identification number of the vehicle that it was removed from. This bill would also require a core recycler to maintain a log that includes a description of all catalytic converters purchased or received, as specified. The bill would make a violation of these provisions punishable as a misdemeanor, as specified. (4)  By creating new criminal offenses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.

State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. Section 21610.1 is added to the Business and line 2 Professions Code, to read:
line 3 21610.1. (a)  Notwithstanding Section 21610 or any other law, line 4 a core recycler, as defined in Section 21610, shall not purchase or line 5 otherwise accept any catalytic converter unless both of the line 6 following are true:
line 7 (1)  The catalytic converter has been engraved, etched, or line 8 otherwise permanently marked with the vehicle identification line 9 number from which it was removed.
line 10 (2)  The catalytic converter is recorded on a regularly updated line 11 log of all catalytic converters purchased or otherwise accepted by 99 SB 919 — 2 —
18 - 16
line 1 the core recycler that is maintained for a period of no less than two line 2 years, is made available to any law enforcement officer upon line 3 demand, and contains, without limitation, all of the following line 4 information:
line 5 (A)  A description of the catalytic converter, including the vehicle line 6 identification number engraved on the catalytic converter. line 7 (B)  The full name, date of birth, and identification number of line 8 the seller, as verified by the core recycler.
line 9 (b)  A violation of this section is punishable by imprisonment line 10 in the county jail not exceeding one year and by a fine, as follows:
line 11 (1)  For a first conviction, a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000). line 12 (2)  For a second conviction, a fine of two thousand dollars line 13 ($2,000).
line 14 (3)  For a third or subsequent conviction, a fine of four thousand line 15 dollars ($4,000).
line 16 SEC. 2. Section 10851.7 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
line 17 10851.7. (a)  A person shall not buy, sell, receive, or possess line 18 a catalytic converter that has been obtained in any manner line 19 constituting theft.
line 20 (b)  (1)  A person shall not remove, alter, or obfuscate any vehicle line 21 identification number or other unique marking that has been added line 22 to a catalytic converter.
line 23 (2)  This subdivision does not apply to either of the following:
line 24 (A)  A person who is removing, altering, or obfuscating a vehicle line 25 identification number or other unique marking in order to apply a line 26 new vehicle identification number or unique marking because the line 27 catalytic converter is being lawfully installed on a different vehicle. line 28 (B)  A person that is disassembling, smelting, or otherwise line 29 permanently destroying a catalytic converter lawfully in their line 30 possession.
line 31 (c)  In establishing probable cause for an arrest pursuant to line 32 subdivision (a), a peace officer does not need to have actual line 33 knowledge that the catalytic converter is stolen. Probable cause line 34 may be established based on specific facts, including, without line 35 limitation, any of the following, that in the particular circumstance line 36 lead the officer to reasonably believe that the catalytic converter line 37 is stolen:
line 38 (1)  The catalytic converter has been cut or otherwise shows line 39 marks or damage consistent with illicit removal. 99 — 3 — SB 919
18 - 17
line 1 (2)  The person in possession of the catalytic converter line 2 concurrently possesses tools commonly used in the illicit removal line 3 of catalytic converters.
line 4 (3)  The catalytic converter has markings that associate it with line 5 a particular vehicle or with a particular make or model of vehicle line 6 not associated with the person in possession of the catalytic line 7 converter.
line 8 (4)  The person is not able to reasonably account for the origin line 9 of the catalytic converter, or makes inconsistent, misleading, or line 10 demonstrably false statements regarding their possession of the line 11 catalytic converter.
line 12 (5)  The person is in possession of, or has sold or attempted to line 13 sell, multiple catalytic converters outside of the scope of a line 14 legitimate business enterprise.
line 15 (6)  The defendant has prior arrests or convictions that line 16 demonstrate knowledge of catalytic converter theft. line 17 (d)  In any prosecution of a violation of subdivision (a), the state line 18 does not need to present a victim or prove that the catalytic line 19 converter was actually stolen. Proof of the offense may be satisfied line 20 through the presentation of circumstantial evidence, satisfactory line 21 to the finder of fact, that the nature of the catalytic converter is line 22 consistent with one that has been stolen, including, without line 23 limitation, any of the factors described in paragraphs (1) through line 24 (4), inclusive, of subdivision (c).
line 25 (e)  A violation of this section is punishable as follows:
line 26 (1)  A violation of subdivision (a) where the value of the catalytic line 27 converter exceeds nine hundred fifty dollars ($950) is punishable line 28 by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 of line 29 the Penal Code.
line 30 (2)  A violation of subdivision (a) where the value of the catalytic line 31 converter does not exceed nine hundred fifty dollars ($950), or a line 32 violation of subdivision (b) is punishable by imprisonment in the line 33 county jail not exceeding one year.
line 34 (3)  In addition to the punishments prescribed in paragraphs (1) line 35 and (2), the court shall impose a fine as follows:
line 36 (A)  For a first conviction, a fine of one thousand dollars line 37 ($1,000).
line 38 (B)  For a second conviction, a fine of two thousand dollars line 39 ($2,000).
99 SB 919 — 4 —
18 - 18
line 1 (C)  For a third or subsequent conviction, a fine of four thousand line 2 dollars ($4,000).
line 3 SEC. 3. Section 24020 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
line 4 24020. (a)  No dealer or person holding a retail seller’s permit line 5 shall sell a new or used vehicle equipped with a catalytic converter line 6 unless the catalytic converter has been engraved, etched, or line 7 otherwise permanently marked with the vehicle identification line 8 number (VIN) of the vehicle to which it is attached. line 9 (b)  A violation of this section is punishable by imprisonment line 10 in the county jail not exceeding one year and by a fine, as follows:
line 11 (1)  For a first conviction, a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000). line 12 (2)  For a second conviction, a fine of two thousand dollars line 13 ($2,000).
line 14 (3)  For a third or subsequent conviction, a fine of four thousand line 15 dollars ($4,000).
line 16 SEC. 4. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 17 Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because line 18 the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school line 19 district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or line 20 infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty line 21 for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of line 22 the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within line 23 the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California line 24 Constitution.

O
99 — 5 — SB 919
18 - 19
ATTACHMENT 3
Senate Bill 366
18 - 20
Senate Bill No. 366
CHAPTER 601
An act to amend Section 11500 of, to add and repeal Section 11545 of, and to repeal Section 1662 of, the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicle dismantling.
[Approved by Governor October 6, 2021. Filed with Secretary of State October 6, 2021.]
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 366, Umberg. Automobile dismantling: task force.

Existing law makes it unlawful for any person to act as an automobile dismantler without having an established place of business, meeting specified requirements, and having a current, valid license or temporary permit issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles. A violation of this provision is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not exceeding $1,000 or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

The bill would make a violation of this provision punishable by specified fines for the first, 2nd, and 3rd and subsequent violations, ranging from $250 to $1,000. The bill would declare a building or place used for the purpose of automobile dismantling in violation of those requirements for operation to be a public nuisance, as specified, and would authorize a public body, as defined, to seek certain remedies.

Existing law provides that the department has no duty to investigate violations of automobile dismantling provisions unless notified by a law enforcement agency of a violation.

This bill would repeal this provision.

Prior law, which was repealed on January 1, 2020, required the department to collaborate with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, the California Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the State Water Resources Control Board, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, the State Air Resources Board, and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, to review and coordinate enforcement and compliance activity related to unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantling, including resulting tax evasion, environmental impacts, and public health impacts.

This bill would reenact those provisions, as modified. This bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles, in consultation with those agencies, on or before January 1, 2024, to submit a report to the Legislature including specified information. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2025.
94 Ch. 601 — 2 —
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to continue the work of the Vehicle Dismantling Industry Strike Team and to implement the January 21, 2020, recommendations of the strike team to address the problem of unlicensed automobile dismantling and to require state agencies to continue in their collaboration to combat unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantling for the purposes of investigating environmental impacts, public health impacts, and tax evasion that is occurring as a result of this activity, and to implement strategies to bring unlicensed automobile dismantlers into compliance through compliance assistance, education, training, and other methods.
18 - 21
(b) The Vehicle Dismantling Industry Strike Team was established in 2017, and was composed of the Department of Motor Vehicles, California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control, State Water Resources Control Board, State Board of Equalization, State Air Resources Board, and Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.
(c) The Vehicle Dismantling Industry Strike Team found that unlicensed automobile dismantling occurs not just in private garages and industrial areas, but also in residential neighborhoods, near parks, schools, and vulnerable waterways.
(d) The Vehicle Dismantling Industry Strike Team found that unlicensed automobile dismantlers, unlike licensed automobile dismantlers, harm the environment and public health, have unsafe workplaces,sell defective parts, create a strain on the economy due to millions of dollars lost in uncollected taxes and fees, pay salaries under the table, and put employees at risk by not providing workers’ compensation insurance.
(e) The Vehicle Dismantling Industry Strike Team as of January 1, 2020, generated 1,105 cases that included identifying 824 unlicensed automobile dismantlers, issued 566 citations, and referred 202 cases to allied state environmental agencies and 81 cases to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for further investigation and enforcement. (f) The Vehicle Dismantling Industry Strike Team’s January 21, 2020, report highlighted the importance and beneficial work of coordinated enforcement and compliance activities associated with the strike team, which was instrumental in persuading violators to comply with licensing requirements, enforcing public nuisance and abatement laws, assessing fines and penalties for noncompliance, and, overall, ensuring the protection of public health and the environment.
(g) Further, the Vehicle Dismantling Industry Strike Team’s January 21, 2020, report included a number of specific recommendations to maintain the momentum in addressing unregulated, unlicensed automobile dismantling operations, including continuation of the coordinated enforcement and compliance activities of the strike team and with providing the authority to utilize public nuisance and abatement laws to shutter those operations as 94 — 3 — Ch. 601
well as authority to increase fines on unlicensed automobile dismantlers for noncompliance.

SEC. 2. Section 1662 of the Vehicle Code is repealed.

SEC. 3. Section 11500 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
11500. (a) (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to act as an automobile dismantler without first having an established place of business that meets the requirements set forth in Section 11514 and without first having procured a license or temporary permit issued by the department, or when such license or temporary permit has been canceled, suspended, revoked, invalidated, expired, or the terms and conditions of an agreement effected pursuant to Section 11509.1 have not been fulfilled. A violation of this subdivision is a misdemeanor, and is subject to the penalties described in paragraph (2).
(2) Notwithstanding Section 42002, a person convicted of a first violation of subdivision (a) shall be punished by a fine of not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250). A person convicted of a second separate violation of subdivision (a) shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars ($500). A person convicted of a third or subsequent violation of subdivision (a) shall be punished by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
(b) (1) A building or place used for the purpose of automobile dismantling in violation of subdivision (a) is a public nuisance subject to being enjoined, abated, and prevented, and for which damages may be recovered by any public body or officer.
18 - 22
(2) As used in this section, “public body” means any state agency, county, city, district, or any other political subdivision of the state.

SEC. 4. Section 11545 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
11545. (a) The department shall collaborate with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, the California Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the State Water Resources Control Board, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the State Air Resources Board to review and coordinate enforcement and compliance activity related to unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantling, including resulting tax evasion, environmental impacts, and public health impacts.
(b) The department, along with the agencies listed in subdivision (a), may collaborate with and solicit information from district attorneys, certified unified program agencies, code enforcement agencies, and any other federal, state, or local agencies with jurisdictions over unlicensed and unregulated automobile dismantlers to achieve the purposes of this section. (c) (1) On or before January 1, 2024, the department, in collaboration with the agencies listed in subdivision (a), shall submit a report to the Legislature including, but not limited to, the following:
(A) The number of unlicensed automobile dismantlers investigated and the number of investigations that resulted in an administrative enforcement action, a civil enforcement action, criminal prosecution, or compliance assistance activity.
94 (B) The number of unlicensed automobile dismantlers investigated and the number of investigations that resulted in an enforcement action for theft of a catalytic converter or purchase, receipt, possession, or sale of a stolen catalytic convertor.
(C) The number of locations used for unlicensed automobile dismantling that were determined to be a public nuisance and the number of actions taken to enjoin, abate, or prevent the illegal activity from continuing. (D) Progress made to bring unlicensed automobile dismantlers into compliance through the adoption and implementation of the recommendations from the January 21, 2020, report submitted to the Legislature pursuant to Assembly Bill 1858 of the 2015–16 Regular Session. (E) Remaining statutory, administrative, or regulatory gaps for investigating and prosecuting unlicensed automobile dismantlers. (F) Recommendations for additional strategies for bringing unlicensed automobile dismantlers into compliance through compliance assistance, education, training, or other identified methods.
(G) Recommendations for modifying, eliminating, or continuing the coordinated enforcement and compliance activities pursuant to thissection. (2) The report required by this subdivision shall be submitted to the Legislature pursuant to Section 9795 of the Government Code. (d) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2025, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2025, deletes or extends that date.

O
94 18 - 23
ATTACHMENT 4
Assembly Bill 1653
18 - 24
california legislature—2021–22 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1653
Introduced by Assembly Member Patterson
January 14, 2022
An act to amend Section 13899 of the Penal Code, relating to property crimes.
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 1653, as introduced, Patterson. Property crimes: regional property crimes task force.

Existing law, until January 1, 2026, requires the Department of the California Highway Patrol to coordinate with the Department of Justice to convene a regional property crimes task force to identify geographic areas experiencing increased levels of property crimes and assist local law enforcement with resources, such as personnel and equipment.

This bill would specify theft of vehicle parts and accessories as a property crime for consideration by the regional property crimes task force.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.

State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. Section 13899 of the Penal Code is amended to line 2 read:
line 3 13899. The Department of the California Highway Patrol shall, line 4 in coordination with the Department of Justice, convene a regional line 5 property crimes task force to assist local law enforcement in line 6 counties identified by the Department of the California Highway

99 18 - 25
line 1 Patrol as having elevated levels of property crime, including, but line 2 not limited to, organized retail theft and vehicle burglary. theft, line 3 vehicle burglary, and theft of vehicle parts and accessories. The line 4 task force shall provide local law enforcement in the identified line 5 region with logistical support and other law enforcement resources, line 6 including, but not limited to, personnel and equipment, as line 7 determined to be appropriate by the Commissioner of the California line 8 Highway Patrol in consultation with task force members.

O
99 AB 1653 — 2 —
18 - 26
ATTACHMENT 5
Assembly Bill 1659
18 - 27
california legislature—2021–22 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1659
Introduced by Assembly Member Patterson
January 14, 2022
An act to amend Section 220 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles. legislative counsel’s digest
AB 1659, as introduced, Patterson. Automobile dismantlers: catalytic converters.

Existing law defines an “automobile dismantler” as a person who is engaged in the business of buying, selling, or dealing in vehicles that are required to be registered under the Vehicle Code, for the purpose of dismantling the vehicles, buys or sells the integral parts and component materials of those vehicles, or deals in used motor vehicle parts, as specified. The definition of “automobile dismantler” also includes a person who keeps or maintains on property owned by the person, or under their possession or control, 2 or more unregistered motor vehicles no longer intended for, or in condition for, legal use on the highways, as specified. Existing law makes it a crime for a person to act as an automobile dismantler without having an established place of business, meeting specified requirements, and having a current, valid license or temporary permit issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles.

This bill would revise the definition of an automobile dismantler to include a person who keeps or maintains 2 or more used catalytic converters that are not attached to a motor vehicle on property owned by the person, or under their possession or control, for any of the above-described purposes. By expanding the definition of an automobile dismantler, the bill would expand the scope of an existing crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.

99 18 - 28
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.

State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. Section 220 of the Vehicle Code is amended to line 2 read:
line 3 220. (a)   An “automobile dismantler” is any a person not line 4 otherwise expressly excluded by Section 221 who: who is engaged line 5 in the business of buying, selling, or dealing in vehicles of a type line 6 required to be registered under this code, including nonrepairable line 7 vehicles, for the purpose of dismantling the vehicles, who buys or line 8 sells the integral parts and component materials thereof, in whole line 9 or in part, or deals in used motor vehicle parts. This section does line 10 not apply to the occasional and incidental dismantling of vehicles line 11 by dealers who have secured dealer plates from the department line 12 for the current year whose principal business is buying and selling line 13 new and used vehicles, or by owners who desire to dismantle not line 14 more than three personal vehicles within any 12-month period. line 15 (a)  Is engaged in the business of buying, selling, or dealing in line 16 vehicles of a type required to be registered under this code, line 17 including nonrepairable vehicles, for the purpose of dismantling line 18 the vehicles, who buys or sells the integral parts and component line 19 materials thereof, in whole or in part, or deals in used motor vehicle line 20 parts. This section does not apply to the occasional and incidental line 21 dismantling of vehicles by dealers who have secured dealers plates line 22 from the department for the current year whose principal business line 23 is buying and selling new and used vehicles, or by owners who line 24 desire to dismantle not more than three personal vehicles within line 25 any 12-month period.
line 26 (b)  Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (a), line 27 “automobile dismantler” includes a person who keeps or maintains line 28 on real property owned by him, or under his the person, or under line 29 their possession or control, two or more unregistered motor line 30 vehicles no longer intended for, or in condition for, legal use on 99 AB 1659 — 2 —
18 - 29
line 1 the highways, or two or more used catalytic converters that are line 2 not attached to a motor vehicle, whether for the purpose of resale line 3 of used parts, for the purpose of reclaiming for use some or all of line 4 the materials, whether metal, glass, fabric, or otherwise, or to line 5 dispose of them, or for any other purpose.
line 6 SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 7 Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because line 8 the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school line 9 district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or line 10 infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty line 11 for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of line 12 the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within line 13 the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California line 14 Constitution.

O
99 — 3 — AB 1659
18 - 30
ATTACHMENT 6
Weekly Crime Summary
February 22 – 28, 2022
18 - 31
Weekly Crime &
Collision Summary
This is a publication of the South Pasadena Police Department’s Crime Prevention Unit 1422 Mission Street, South Pasadena, CA 91030 626-403-7270 Brian Solinsky – Chief of Police
e-mail: [email protected] www.southpasadenaca.gov February 22 – 28, 2022
(Hundred block given in place of exact address)
The Weekly Crime Summary is a list of reported auto thefts, burglaries, robberies and other activities occurring in the City of South Pasadena. An alert and well-informed citizen makes you less of a target to a criminal. Remember; call the South Pasadena Police Department to report any suspicious activity.

THEFT
• 2-18-22, 6:30 PM to 2-22-22, 3:50 AM, 1900 block of Fremont (Almansor Academy). ’13, ’15, ’16 Ford StarCraft. ’03, ’06, ’10 Chevrolet Aerolite.

Suspect(s) cut and remove loss from multiple vehicles. LOSS: Catalytic converters.
• 2-23-22, 7:45 AM to 6:40 PM, 800 block of Brent. ’05 Honda Accord.

Suspect(s) cut and remove loss from victim’s vehicle. LOSS: Catalytic converter.
• 2-26-22, 9:00 PM to 2-27-22, 7:35 AM, 1300 block of Mountain View. ’21 Volvo V60. Suspect(s) take loss from victim’s unlocked vehicle. LOSS:

Vehicle registration, vehicle manual.
• 2-27-22, 10:24 PM to 2-28-22, 10:56 AM, 1200 block of Kolle. ’08 Toyota Prius. Suspect(s) cut and remove loss from victim’s vehicle. LOSS:

Catalytic converter.

RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY
2-24-22, 8:38 AM to 9:27 AM, 500 block of Monterey. Officers respond to a call regarding a suspicious subject possibly casing the area and finds suspect walking out of victim’s property. Suspect is also found to be in possession of methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia. SUSPECT ARRESTED: Male, Hispanic, 33 years, Santa Rosa. LOSS: Bicycle (recovered).

DRUNK IN PUBLIC
2-25-22, 4:25 AM to 4:47 AM, 600 block of Mission. Officers respond to a call regarding two subjects attempting to burglarize a vehicle. Suspects are found to be under the influence of alcohol and unable to care for themselves. SUSPECT 18 - 32
ARRESTED: S1 – Male, Hispanic, 25 years, San Gabriel. S2 – Male, Hispanic, 26 years, Los Angeles.

TRESPASSING
2-21-22, 7:00 AM to 2-22-22, 10:00 AM, 300 block of Monterey. Suspect trespasses onto vacant property.

POSSESSION OF PARAPHERNALIA
2-25-22, 8:39 PM to 8:52 PM, Monterey/Via Del Rey. Officers respond to a call regarding a suspicious subject and finds suspect to be in possession of drug paraphernalia. SUSPECT ARRESTED: Male, Hispanic, 34 years, Los Angeles.

STOLEN VEHICLE
2-27-22, 2:45 AM to 2:47 AM, 800 block of Orange Grove (attempt). ’11 Ford E250. Suspect(s) tamper with driver side lock to gain entry and tampers with ignition, but fails to start vehicle. Car alarm activates and suspect(s) flees.

RECOVERED STOLEN VEHICLE
2-27-22, 4:59 PM, 700 block of El Centro. ’20 Mitsubishi Outlander. Vehicle is found parked on the street and discovered to be stolen from LAPD Rampart Division.

VANDALISM
2-24-22, 12:42 AM to 12:43 AM, 1000 block of Fair Oaks. Suspect(s) use spray paint to vandalize a wall.

FRAUD
2-27-22, 12:30 PM to 2-28-22, 3:53 PM, 1500 block of Camino Lindo. Suspect(s) use victim’s information to open unauthorized accounts and make unauthorized purchases.

TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
Injury Traffic Collision
2-22-22, 11:35 PM to 2-23-22, 1:16 AM, 300 block of Orange Grove.

Non-injury Traffic Collision
• 2-22-22, 5:47 PM, Kolle/Monterey.
• 2-23-22, 1:34 PM, Monterey/Brent. Assisted with info exchange. • 2-24-22, 4:04 PM, 900 block of Lyndon. Unsafe lane change. • 2-28-22, 1:24 PM, Orange Grove/110 Freeway.
18 - 33
• 2-24-22, 6:31 PM, Fremont/Orange. Hit and run.
• 2-27-22, 12:47 PM to 1:33 PM, 1700 block of Hill. Hit and run.

For graffiti removal, call the City of South Pasadena “Graffiti Removal Hotline” at 626-403-7249. This is a 24-hour a day recording. A written release is required prior to removal from private property.

To obtain immediate news releases, follow us on the web:
18 - 34

← All documents from this meeting