Cities Index.
Attachment 3 - Proposal Evalutation Criteria and Scoring

South San Francisco City Council
March 9, 2022

Document
Attachment 3 - Proposal Evalutation Criteria and Scoring
Meeting
March 9, 2022
Body
South San Francisco City Council
Pages
3
Original file
120 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ci-ssf-ca.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

City of South San Francisco
Capital Projects
Jacob Gilchrist, Director
400 Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA 94080

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. pk2201
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center
RESPONSE DEADLINE: December 15, 2021 at 12:00 pm
Report Generated: Friday, February 25, 2022
PHASE 1 - PROPOSALS

EVALUATORS
Name Title
B Crume Program Manager
Angela Duldulao Recreation Manager
Jacob Gilchrist Director
Greg Mediati Deputy Director, Parks and Recreation
Brian Noce Acting Recreation Supervisor
Sharon Ranals Assistant City Manager/P&R Director
Devin Stenhouse Recreation Supervisor
Philip Vitale Deputy Director

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. pk2201
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

EVALUATION TABULATION
Request for Proposals - Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

Page 2 ends

EVALUATION CRITERIA
Criteria Description Scoring Method Weight (Points)
Knowledge and Understanding Demonstrated understanding of the RFP objectives and work
requirements. Identification of key
issues. Methods of approach, work
plan, and experience with similar
projects related to type of services.

Points Based 40 (40% of Total)
Management Approach and Staffing
Plan
Qualifications of project staff
(particularly key personnel such as the
project manager), key personnel’s
level of involvement in performing
related work and the team’s
experience in maintaining schedule.

Points Based 25 (25% of Total)
Qualifications of the Proposer Firm Experience with similar projects.

Technical experience in performing
work related to type of services;
record of completing work on
schedule; strength and stability of the
firm; technical experience and
strength and stability of proposed
subconsultants; demonstrated
communications quality and success;
and assessments by client references
as available.

Points Based 25 (25% of Total)
Presentation of a concise and
responsive proposal
Points Based 10 (10% of Total)
VENDOR SCORES BY EVALUATION CRITERIA – PROPOSALS

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. pk2201
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

EVALUATION TABULATION
Request for Proposals - Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

Page 3 ends

Vendor Knowledge and
Understanding
Points Based
40 Points (40%)
Management Approach
and Staffing Plan
Points Based
25 Points (25%)
Qualifications of the
Proposer Firm
Points Based
25 Points (25%)
Presentation of a concise
and responsive proposal
Points Based
10 Points (10%)
Total Score
(Max Score 100)
Barker Rinker Seacat
Architecture

33.8 21.2 20.2 8 83.17
ELS Architecture and
Urban Design
37 22.7 22.5 9 91.17
Group 4 Architecture
Research + Planning
35 22 20.8 8.7 86.5
Marcy Wong Donn Logan 32.2 19.2 19.3 7.5 78.17
WRNS Studio 37.2 21.2 21.7 8.5 88.5

← All documents from this meeting