Cities Index.
Attachment 4 - Interview Evaluation and Scoring

South San Francisco City Council
March 9, 2022

Document
Attachment 4 - Interview Evaluation and Scoring
Meeting
March 9, 2022
Body
South San Francisco City Council
Pages
5
Original file
125 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ci-ssf-ca.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

City of South San Francisco
Capital Projects
Jacob Gilchrist, Director
400 Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA 94080

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. pk2201
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center
RESPONSE DEADLINE: December 15, 2021 at 12:00 pm
Report Generated: Friday, February 25, 2022
PHASE 2 - INTERVIEWS

EVALUATORS
Name Title
B Crume Program Manager
Angela Duldulao Recreation Manager
Greg Mediati Deputy Director, Parks and Recreation
Brian Noce Acting Recreation Supervisor
Sharon Ranals Assistant City Manager/P&R Director
Joshua Richardson Parks Manager
Devin Stenhouse Recreation Supervisor
Philip Vitale Deputy Director

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. pk2201
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

EVALUATION TABULATION
Request for Proposals - Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

Page 2 ends

EVALUATION CRITERIA
Criteria Description Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Sustainability and Design
Excellence: Balancing beauty and
durability
The Orange Memorial Park Swimming
Pool is one of the most popular Cityowned amenities in SSF. How would your team help us balance beauty and
durability in the new Aquatic Center?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

2. Sustainability and Design
Excellence: SSF unique attributes
What do you see as unique attributes
of South San Francisco, and how
would you integrate those into the
aquatic center design?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

3. Sustainability and Design
Excellence: Context of the larger park
Orange Memorial Park is the heart of
South San Francisco as the focal point
of team sports, community gatherings,
events, and recreation. How would
your team plan to integrate the
aquatic center within the context of
the larger community park?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

4. Sustainability and Design
Excellence: Sustainability certifications
What experience do you have with
LEED and other sustainability
certifications for pools/aquatic
centers?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

5. Sustainability and Design
Excellence: All-electric pool/aquatic
center
The City of South San Francisco is
moving away from natural gas in new
construction. Please describe the
considerations and processes involved
to design, maintain and operate an allelectric pool/aquatic center. 0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. pk2201
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

EVALUATION TABULATION
Request for Proposals - Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

Page 3 ends

Criteria Description Scoring Method Weight (Points)

6. Innovation in Aquatic Center
Design: Emerging trends in aquatic
recreation
What do you see as emerging trends
in aquatic recreation, and how would
you integrate them into a more
traditional pool complex?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

7. Innovation in Aquatic Center
Design: Equipment replacement and
maintenance
How do you propose we design an
innovative pool system yet utilize
equipment that will remain readily
available for replacement and
maintenance?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

8. Innovation in Aquatic Center
Design: In-house operated and
maintained systems
We currently conduct general
maintenance of our pool system. How
would you design a system that can be
maintained and operated in-house?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

9. Public Project Experience:

Community Engagement
The City of South San Francisco is a
strong proponent of inclusiveness of
race, gender, sexual orientation,
disabilities, and socioeconomic
background in all aspects of the
community. How would you structure
community engagement to reach
diverse populations, and how have
you addressed community
engagement during COVID?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

10. Public Project Experience:

Competing desires
What experience do you have working
with community interest groups (swim
teams, seniors, youth, etc.) with
competing desires? Please describe
your strategies used to find common
ground amongst these groups?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. pk2201
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

EVALUATION TABULATION
Request for Proposals - Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

Page 4 ends

Criteria Description Scoring Method Weight (Points)

11. Public Project Experience: Various
stakeholder influences
There is an expectation that the
design team will present iterations of
the designs to several stakeholder
groups. In your experience, how do
City Councils, Commissions, and
various stakeholders influence the
design? How would you help us
consider these influences when
designing the aquatic center?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

12. Budget: Escalation Construction costs in the Bay Area have been increasing rapidly in recent
years. How would you approach
design to account for escalation? And
how would you reconcile stakeholder
desires/wants with the project budget
while accounting for escalation?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

13. Budget: Fee If we ask you to sharpen your pencil,
how would you approach reducing
your overall fee?
0-10 Points 10 (7.7% of Total)

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. pk2201
Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

EVALUATION TABULATION
Request for Proposals - Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center

Page 5 ends

Vendor 11. Public Project Experience:

Various stakeholder influences
0-10 Points
10 Points (7.7%)

12. Budget: Escalation
0-10 Points
10 Points (7.7%)

13. Budget: Fee
0-10 Points
10 Points (7.7%)
Total Score
(Max Score 130)
ELS Architecture and Urban
Design

8.4 8 7 108.13
Group 4 Architecture
Research + Planning

7.9 8.3 8.5 105.88
WRNS Studio 7.4 7.9 7.3 100
Barker Rinker Seacat
Architecture
Excluded
0 0 0 0
Marcy Wong Donn Logan
Excluded
0 0 0 0

← All documents from this meeting