Cities Index.
Attachment 1 - Evaluation Summary

South San Francisco City Council
June 8, 2022

Document
Attachment 1 - Evaluation Summary
Meeting
June 8, 2022
Body
South San Francisco City Council
Pages
2
Original file
468 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ci-ssf-ca.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

City of South San Francisco
Public Works/Engineering Division
Matthew Ruble, Principal Engineer
400 Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA 94080

EVALUATION TABULATION
Municipal Engineering Services for Fiscal Years 2022-23, 23-24, and 24-25

EVALUATORS
Name Title
Jason Hallare Senior Engineer
Bianca Liu Senior Engineer
Matthew Ruble Principal Engineer

EVALUATION CRITERIA
Criteria Description Scoring Method Weight (Points)
Familiarity and
Understanding of the City
Based on the information provided by the City and past experience in South San Francisco, does the consultant understand the unique nature of City’s neighborhoods and the City’s CIP processes? Does the consultant have familiarity with the City and the area required to successfully execute the CIP programs? How close are the consultant’s permanent offices to the area? (Preference is to local or near-local consultants).

Points Based 10
(16.7% of Total)
Staffing
Do assigned personnel and subconsultants have requisite education, experience, and professional qualifications? Are the qualifications of the consultant’s personnel suitable for the execution of programs; and, does the consultant’s organizational structure show sufficient depth for its present workload?
Points Based 20
(33.3% of Total)
Relevant Experience
Has the consultant demonstrated the ability to successfully provide services for projects of a similar complexity and nature as described herein? Was this experience in the City of South San Francisco or nearby or similar agencies?
Points Based 20
(33.3% of Total)
Specific Management
Approach
How does the consultant intend to achieve the City’s budget and time goals for projects? How will the consultant apply its management techniques and resources? Does the consultant have E-Builder experience?
Points Based 10
(16.7% of Total)

EVALUATION TABULATION
RFP No. RFP_MuniEngSrvc_22-25
Municipal Engineering Services for Fiscal Years 2022-23, 23-24, and 24-25

EVALUATION TABULATION
Request for Proposals - Municipal Engineering Services for Fiscal Years 2022-23, 23-24, and 24-25

Page 2 ends

AGGREGATE SCORES SUMMARY
Vendor Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 Evaluator 3 Total Score
(Max Score 60)
CSG Consultants, Inc. 57 59 55 57.00
DKS Associates 56 56 52 54.67
Gannett Fleming, Inc. 58 55 51 54.67
Gray-Bowen-Scott 56 55 56 55.67
Michael Baker International, Inc 51 49 52 50.67
Swinerton Management and Consulting 60 60 52 57.33
TRC Engineers, Inc. 57 53 50 53.33
West Coast Code Consultants, Inc. 56 56 52 54.67

VENDOR SCORES BY EVALUATION CRITERIA
Vendor Familiarity and
Understanding of
the City
10 Points
Staffing
20 Points
Relevant Experience
20 Points
Specific
Management
Approach
10 Points
Total Score
(Max Score 60)
CSG Consultants, Inc. 9.7 19.3 20 8 57.00
DKS Associates 8.3 18.7 18.7 9 54.67
Gannett Fleming, Inc. 9 18.7 17.3 9.7 54.67
Gray-Bowen-Scott 9.3 18.7 18.7 9 55.67
Michael Baker International, Inc 7.7 18 16.3 8.7 50.67
Swinerton Management and Consulting 9.7 19 19.3 9.3 57.33 TRC Engineers, Inc. 8 18 17.7 9.7 53.33
West Coast Code Consultants, Inc. 8.7 19.3 18.3 8.3 54.67

← All documents from this meeting