South San Francisco City Council
January 25, 2023

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Table of Contents
City of South San Francisco
Proposal for Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
November 3, 2022
(Preceding Page) Cover Letter
Section
1 Consultant Information, Qualification & Experience
2 Organization and Approach
3 Scope of Work
4 Schedule of Work
5 Conflict of Interest Statement
6 Litigation
7 Cost Proposal (Separate Cover)
8 Resumes

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
1 Consultant Information, Qualifications
& Experience

1.1 Project History
Over the past twenty years, Wilsey Ham
has worked on several pump station
projects in South San Francisco and other
municipalities on the peninsula, including in
neighboring Brisbane. For these projects,
we have worked closely with Schaaf &
Wheeler to develop pump station plans that
incorporate the wants and needs of City
O&M staff while providing long lasting
infrastructure improvements. We have a
strong working relationship that keep
projects on budget and on schedule.

In addition to our pump station work, we
also have experience working on public
infrastructure projects that are over
municipal landfills and Bay Mud.

Individually, each component adds
complexity to a project, but when both are
present it offers a unique challenge with
respect to settlement. We have worked with
Langan on several projects at Oyster Point
that involved extensive settlement and the
need to excavate landfill waste and repair
the clay cap, which requires environmental
clearances with the County.

Examples of our team’s experience working
on pump stations and over landfills can be
found in the following section.

1.2 Project Experience and
Performance
Pump Station Experience
Below are examples of Wilsey Ham’s and
the design team’s experience in the service
areas requested by the City.

Relocation of South San Francisco
Industrial Sewage Pump Station No. 1
City of South San Francisco
Over the past two decades, Wilsey Ham
and Schaaf & Wheeler prepared contract
documents to rehabilitate eight of the City’s
sewage pumping stations (with individual
station capacities ranging up to 13 MGD) as
part of a multi-phase, multi-year project. The
project was intended to rehabilitate major
trunk lines, interceptors, force mains and
sewage pump stations serving commercial
and industrial tributaries east of U.S.

Highway 101 as ordered by the RWQCB in
a Cease-and-Desist Order.

Figure 1: Original Pump Station #1 prior to relocation
Pump Station No. 1 is the pump station
located at the end of Oyster Point Boulevard
near the Oyster Point Marina. It was
relocated, with an entirely new facility
constructed. This 0.86 MGD Industrial
Sewage Pump Station receives sewage
from the Oyster Point commercial area and
discharges sewage through a force main to
a gravity sanitary sewer manhole near the
intersection of Oyster Point Blvd. and Gull
Drive.

Sanitary sewer service could not be
interrupted, so the existing pumping facility
remained operable throughout construction
to avoid temporary pumping. As part of the
construction plans, the old Pump Station
No. 1 was demolished, with some of the
underground facilities abandoned.

Our team developed a basis of design
(BOD) report, including alternative pump
station configurations (e.g. wet well / dry pit;
variable speed and constant speed). Plans
and cost estimates for each of the

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
alternatives were prepared to the 30%
submittal level to document selection of the
preferred pump station relocation plan. This
document noted potential constructability
issues, operational phasing and existing
pump station demolition, utility conflicts and
permitting requirements.

Our team prepared the PS&E package for
bidding, which included detailed electrical
and structural design. We also obtained City
permits including a building permit, fire
department approval and other regulatory
approval required for construction. After the
submittal of final contract documents, our
engineers provided bid and construction
support services.

Team:

Wilsey Ham (Prime, Civil), Schaaf &
Wheeler (Pump Station Design), Biggs
Cardosa Associates (Structural), Langan
(Geotech)
Staff:

Eric Cohen (WH), Supervising Engineer,
Chuck Anderson (S&W), Anthony Notaro
(BCA), Justin Ray (Langan)
Dates:

Project Start: January 2019
Project Complete: August 2021
Contract Amount:
$500,000
Construction Cost:
$4.2 million
Funding Source:

Private Development
Client and Contact:

Kilroy Realty (Developer)
Jonas Vass
Executive Vice President
100 First Street, Suite 250
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 778-7741
Project Owner:

City of South San Francisco (Operator)
Eunejune Kim
Public Works Director
315 Maple Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 877-8550
[email protected]
Expansion of South San Francisco
Industrial Pump Station No. 2
City of South San Francisco
Industrial Pump Station No. 2 receives
sewage from the Oyster Point Boulevard
area, including discharge from Pump
Stations No. 1 and 14. Pump Station No. 2’s
discharge force main travels south to a
gravity sanitary sewer manhole along
Gateway Blvd.

Wilsey Ham and Schaaf & Wheeler
designed the rehabilitation of the 3.5 MGD
Industrial Sewage Pump Station No. 2 in
South San Francisco. Our engineers
worked with the City to understand the
existing service loads, including anticipated
dry-weather low flows and peak wet
weather discharge that must be
accommodated by temporary pumping
facilities during construction.

Due to development phasing, inflow to the
pump station may change over time.

Therefore our engineers designed an
operational system that can maintain
flushing velocities within the discharge force
main under initial low inflow conditions as
well as the ultimate peak wet weather
loading with full capacity.

Our team developed a basis-of-design
(BOD) report including alternative pump
station configurations. Plans and cost
estimates for each of the alternatives were
prepared to the 30% submittal level to
document selection of the preferred pump
station relocation plan. This document noted
potential constructability issues, operational
phasing, utility conflicts and permitting
requirements.

Since this project was located on private
property within a pump station easement,
we needed to work with the landowner to
obtain the easements needed. Wilsey
Ham’s survey department drafted the plats
and legals needed for the expansion of the
pump station, which the City presented to

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
the landowner. An agreement was made
where the easements were granted in
exchange for architectural improvements to
the station that better fit with the
surrounding architecture that was being
constructed. Our team coordinated with the
landowner’s architect and landscape
architect to incorporate the façade
improvements into the bid documents.

Figure 2: Pump Station No. 2 after completion of
construction.

Our team prepared the PS&E package,
including electrical, structural and
architectural design, for bidding. We also
obtained City permits including a building
permit, fire department approval and other
regulatory approval required for
construction. After the submittal of final
contract documents, our engineers
provided bid and construction support
services.

Team:

Wilsey Ham (Prime, Civil), Schaaf &
Wheeler (Pump Station Design), Biggs
Cardosa Associates (Structural), Langan
(Geotech)
Staff:

Eric Cohen (WH), Supervising Engineer,
Chuck Anderson (S&W), Victoria O. Belli
(S&W), Anthony Notaro (BCA)
Dates:

Project Start: January 2018
Project Complete: August 2021
Contract Amount:
$380,000
Construction Cost:
$3.2 million
Funding Source:

City of South San Francisco Wastewater
Client/Project Owner:

City of South San Francisco
Eunejune Kim
Public Works Director
315 Maple Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 877-8550
[email protected]
Sierra Point Sewage Lift Station No. 4
City of Brisbane
Wilsey Ham and Schaaf & Wheeler
completed design services for the
replacement and relocation of Sewage Lift
Station No. 4 for the City of Brisbane on
Sierra Point Parkway. The new pump
station is designed for a firm capacity of 1.4
million gallons per day. By relocating the
pump station on site, the existing pumping
facility remained operational throughout
construction to avoid lengthy and expensive
bypass pumping.

Station elements include a below-grade
vault housing sewage grinders; a belowgrade wet well housing rail-mounted submersible pumps; pump discharge piping,
fittings and valves; a magnetic flow meter;
an air release/air vacuum valve suitable for
wastewater; an emergency bypass
connection; new motor control center and
main switchgear; grinder motors and
controls; standby diesel engine-generator
with automatic transfer switch; a jib crane
for equipment removal; a CMU building to
house electrical controls and a standby
generator with automatic transfer switch;
and site access improvements.

The existing and replacement pump stations
are built on top of an existing closed landfill.

Special design considerations included a
deep foundation using piles and a methane
gas mitigation system. Coordination with the
County Health Department was required,
including the issuance of a post-closure
development plan. During construction,
precautions were taken to dispose of
excavated soils.

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Team:

Wilsey Ham (Prime, Civil), Schaaf &
Wheeler (Pump Station Design), Biggs
Cardosa Associates (Structural)
Staff:

Eric Cohen (WH), Supervising Engineer,
Chuck Anderson (S&W), Anthony Notaro
(BCA),
Dates:

Project Start: February 2019
Project Complete: May 2022
Contract Amount:
$550,000
Construction Cost:
$4.4 million
Funding Source:

Private Development
Client and Contact:

Project Management Advisors (Developer)
Devin Bertsch
Project Director
1 Tower Place, Suite 200
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 491-8801
Project Owner:

City of Brisbane (Operator)
Randy Breault
Public Works Director
50 Park Place
Brisbane, CA 94005
(415) 508-2130
[email protected]
Design of Pump Station Improvements
City of Oakland
The City of Oakland’s Pump Station Master
Plan of 2007 identified the upgrade of 6
existing sanitary sewer pump station
facilities.

In order to comply with an administrative
order from the EPA, the City of Oakland
hired Schaaf & Wheeler to design
improvements to these sanitary sewer pump
stations. Designed improvements included
the installation of new wet wells or
rehabilitation of existing wet wells,
installation of new engine generators, new
controls, new pumps, new piping/valves,
new force mains, bypass pumping
connections and necessary site
improvements.

The end goal of the project was to have low
maintenance pump stations that they can
certify for compliance with the EPA and
RWQCB requirements for reliability.

Each of the six stations presented unique
challenges that had to be addressed during
the design. These challenges are related to
the location of pump stations including
being:
• adjacent to a creek,
• located in a busy roadway in front of a
community college and
• located in a neighborhood with sensitive
neighbors.

To mitigate these challenges, each station
was evaluated for alternative design and
construction options to minimize the impact
to the surrounding area. For the station next
to a creek, strict protection measures were
put in place. For the station adjacent to a
community college the station location was
moved to minimize the amount of work
affecting the school. Where neighbors were
concerned about the pump station, the
rehabilitation was designed to minimize the
station’s visual impact by reducing
equipment size and masking it with
landscaping/fencing. Schaaf & Wheeler also
coordinated the project and obtained
permits from 10 different agencies during
the design process.

Team:

Schaaf & Wheeler (Pump Station Design),
TJCAA (Electrical Design)
Staff:

Glen Anderson (S&W), Paul Giorsetto
(TJCAA)
Dates:

Project Start: 2014
Project Complete: 2017
Contract Amount:
$411,000
Construction Cost:
$2.1 million
Funding Source:

Capital Improvements

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Client and Contact:

City of Oakland
David Ng
Supervising Engineer
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4314
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-7267
[email protected]
Landfill Experience
Below are examples of Wilsey Ham’s and
the design team’s experience with
developments over a landfill.

Oyster Point Phase IC – Streets and
Utilities
City of South San Francisco
The Oyster Point peninsula was operated
as a Class III municipal landfill (Oyster Point
Landfill) from about 1956 until it stopped
accepting waste in 1970. Landfill closure
activities were performed around the site in
the 1970’s and 1980’s in accordance with
State of California Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) regulatory
guidelines that governed at that time; this
was prior to the adoption of California Code
of Regulations (CCR) Title 27, the
regulatory document currently governing
Class III landfill closures. Improvements
were installed over the refuse, including a
harbor, marina facilities, park area, roads,
utilities, walkways and other features.

Redevelopment of the Oyster Point
peninsula is currently in progress, with
Phase IC in the final stages of construction.

For this project, Wilsey Ham and Langan
worked together to prepare the construction
documents for the following:
• Relocation of 200,000 cubic yards of
refuse on site
• Installation of new clay cap over
excavated refuse
• Repair deficient clay cap around the 40-
acre site
• Relocation of Oyster Point Blvd. and
Marina Blvd
• Installation of new wet utilities, including
sanitary sewer gravity main, sanitary
force main, water main, and storm drain.
• Construction of new Bay Trail
• Construction of new marina park and
beach
• Parking Lot Installation
Figure 3: Aerial image of Oyster Point Phase IC
improvements.

For the project, Langan performed
numerous studies to evaluate the existing
landfill, clay cap, and underlying subsurface
conditions. Through these investigations,
Langan made recommendations for
excavations, clay cap installation, clay cap
tie-ins and other details needed for the
landfill waste relocation. Wilsey Ham
incorporated these recommendations into
the construction document set that was bid.

Before construction began and with input
from Wilsey Ham., Langan prepared a
Landfill Post-Closure Development Plan to
meet the requirements of Title 27 CCR
landfill post-closure development standards.

This plan needed to be approved prior to
construction began, and provided a blue
print for the policies and procedures the
contractor needed to follow. During
construction, Langan oversaw regrading of
the landfill on behalf of the City, preparing
reports for submission to the San Mateo
County Environmental Health Services
(SMECS) and Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) for approval. At
the completion of the project, Wilsey Ham
prepared as-built drawings showing that the
critical aspects of the landfill closure plan,
such as the thickness of the clay cap, were
installed appropriately. These record

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
drawings were submitted to SMCEHS and
RWQCB by Langan for approval and
recordation.

With the underlying characteristics of the
soil, settlement was a challenging aspect of
this project. Wilsey Ham prepared a grading
plan for the site, which was analyzed by
Langan to estimate the amount of
settlement that was expected. Site design
was then adjusted by Wilsey Ham to
incorporate the anticipated settlement into
the design. For example, the longitudinal
slopes of the road were maxed at 4.5%,
which allowed for settlement without
exceeding ADA standards.

In the marina, two new restrooms were
designed and installed. Since the restrooms
were below the gravity mains in the
roadway, sump pumps were designed to
eject the wastewater generated. The sump
pumps were placed outside of the buildings,
discharging through new force mains that
discharged to the gravity system in Oyster
Point Blvd. Although settlement is a concern
for structures, the City wanted the
restrooms to settle with the surrounding
area to minimize tripping hazards that may
develop and to keep the cost down. The
restrooms were designed with mat slabs to
achieve this.

Team:

Wilsey Ham (Prime, Civil), Langan
(Geotech/Environmental), Biggs Cardosa
Associates (Restroom Structural)
Staff:

Eric Cohen (WH), Supervising Engineer,
Justin Ray (Langan Geotech), Hayley Farr
(Langan Environmental)
Dates:

Project Start: January 2019
Project Complete: August 2021
Contract Amount:
$500,000
Construction Cost:
$60 million
Funding Source:

Public/Private Partnership
Client and Contact:

Kilroy Realty (Developer)
Jonas Vass
Executive Vice President
100 First Street, Suite 250
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 778-7741
Project Owner:

City of South San Francisco
Eunejune Kim
Public Works Director
315 Maple Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 877-8550
[email protected]
The Shore at Sierra Point
City of Brisbane
The Shore at Sierra Point Development
project is a multi-phase project located in
Brisbane, CA that consists of the
development of a 23-acre site into a biotech campus. The project includes the construction of a parking lot, five buildings,
a parking garage, a recreational landscape
for outdoor, BCDC improvements and all
utilities require to serve the buildings.

The project is underlain by bay mud and
landfill refuse, covered with an engineered
landfill cap. For building design, Wilsey Ham
set the finished floor elevations for all
buildings after re-evaluating site due to
differential settlement. The settled elevation
of the clay cap was used to coordinate
building foundation and structural section to
determine the lowest FF elevations could be
lowered and still avoid penetration of the
existing clay cap. The clay cap was also
influential for the utility design. Where
penetration of the clay cap was
unavoidable, repair details were developed
and approved by the regulatory agencies.

Coordination with the California Department
of Drinking Water (DDW) was needed for
approval of all water mains for the project.

Wilsey Ham’s Civil Engineering and Land
Surveying departments provided the
following services:
• Entitlement Consultation

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
• Topographic Mapping
• Site Improvement Design
• Grading and Drainage Design
• Drainage Analysis
• Stormwater Mitigation
• Water Design over Landfill
• Public Infrastructure Design
• Permit Processing
• Construction Documents
• Construction Administration
• Construction Staking
Team:

Wilsey Ham (Civil)
Staff:

Eric Cohen (WH)
Dates:

Project Start: 2017
Project Complete: 2022
Contract Amount:
$1.5 million
Construction Cost:
$1.0 billion plus
Funding Source:

Private Development
Client and Contact:

Healthpeak (Developer)
Project Management Advisors
Devin Bertsch
Project Director
1 Tower Place, Suite 200
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 491-8801
Genesis Marina
City of Brisbane
Located at the former Sierra Point Landfill,
Genesis Marina will provide 550,000+ SF of
laboratory and Class A office space serving
the science and biotech community. Three
separate five- to six-story buildings will
overlie a two-story podium garage, with a
shared outdoor space overlooking the San
Francisco Bay. Sierra Point, once part of
San Francisco Bay, was progressively filled
between about 1963 and 1975.

Blanketing the site is significant thickness of
compressible landfill refuse and Bay Mud,
52 to 64 feet thick. The geotechnical
engineers evaluated the potential for longterm settlement of refuse and Bay Mud to occur at the site. Because of the magnitude
of the settlement, they concluded the
proposed development should be supported
on steel H-piles. The refuse layer was
regraded at the center of the site, and a clay
cap and cover needed to be placed across
the site. During construction, Langan
observed site preparation, grading, refuse
relocation, compaction of fill/backfill, clay
cap construction and repair, pile installation,
utility trench backfill, and subgrade
preparation for pavements and hardscape.

To comply with state landfill regulations,
Langan’s environmental team developed a
Post Closure Development Plan, which was
submitted to and approved by the San
Mateo County Environmental Health
Department Local Enforcement Agency and
Regional Water Quality Control Board. They
also prepared a Site Management Plan and
Dust Monitoring Plan, designed a landfill
gas mitigation system, and developed
Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) plans
for the landfill gas mitigation system and the
landfill cover. Their environmental services
during construction included implementation
of a CQA program for the landfill cover,
environmental site management, and dust
monitoring.

Team:

Langan (Geotech/Environmental)
Staff:

Justin Ray (Langan Geotech)
Dates:

Project Start: January 2019
Project Complete: 2023
Construction Cost:
$60 million
Funding Source:

Private Development
Client/Owner and Contact:

Phase 3 Realty (Developer)
Adam Cashner
Senior Vice President
4380 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 230
San Diego, CA
(858) 546-0888

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
2 Organization and Approach

2.1 Project Team
Wilsey Ham has assembled a design team
that is not only experienced with pump
station projects, settlement, landfills and the
Bay, but is experienced with the Oyster
Point Development project itself.

The following pages contain:
• Firm Introduction
• Staffing Plan
• Professional References
• Office Locations
• Organizational Chart
Team resumes are included in Section 8.

Wilsey Ham
Wilsey Ham, Inc. is an 80-year old civil
engineering and land surveying firm that
has been serving public agencies in the San
Francisco Bay area since 1942. From our
inception, we have assisted local
governments throughout the Bay Area with
all manner of civil engineering and land
surveying needs, including extensive work
on sanitary sewer projects, most recently in
Burlingame, San Bruno, San Carlos, Daly
City, South San Francisco and Berkeley.

Wilsey Ham has worked at this site for over
12 years and we are the engineer of record
for Phase IC. In addition, we have served as
the prime consultant on several City of
South San Francisco pump station projects.

Our sanitary sewer projects have included
evaluating sewer collection systems,
recommending installation methods,
designing force mains, identifying pump
station layouts, preparing Bid Documents
and providing assistance during bidding and
construction. Our Survey Department
provides a wide array of field survey and
mapping services that are useful for sanitary
sewer projects, including topographic
surveys, construction staking, and
easement plat and legal descriptions.

Wilsey Ham will be responsible for
managing the project as a whole. In
addition, we will prepare the existing base
mapping, grading plans, force main plans
and design improvements outside of the
new pump station.

Staffing
The following proposed staff will work on
this project:
• Brandon Davis: Project Principal
• Eric Cohen: Supervising Engineer
• Robert Hutton, Supervising Surveyor
• Engineering Support Staff
References
• City of South San Francisco
Eunejune Kim, PE
Director of Public Works
(650) 877-8551
[email protected]
• City of Brisbane
Randy Breault, PE
Director of Public Works
(415) 508-2130
[email protected]
• City of Burlingame
Kevin Okada, PE
Senior Engineer
(650) 558-7213
[email protected]
Office Location
• 3130 La Selva Street, Suite 100
San Mateo, CA 94403
Schaaf & Wheeler
Schaaf & Wheeler (S&W) is a civil
engineering firm whose expertise is in water
resources. With over 30 years of experience
in wastewater design, they are relied upon
by both public and private sector clients to
add value to their projects. S&W are
distinguished for their pump station design,
preparing construction documents for
dozens of pump stations in the San
Francisco Bay Area, including eight in South
San Francisco.

For this project, they will be the lead
designers of the pump station. As lead
designer, S&W will layout the wet well,
pump house and any other site

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
appurtenances that are needed. For the
pump station design, they will manage the
electrical and structural engineers. This will
ensure a smooth and efficient design
process.

Staffing
The following proposed staff are available to
work on this project:
• Charles Anderson: Project Principal
• Glen Anderson: Project Manager
• Engineering support staff
References
• City of South San Francisco
Eunejune Kim, PE
Director of Public Works
(650) 877-8551
[email protected]
• City of Brisbane
Randy Breault, PE
Director of Public Works
(415) 508-2130
[email protected]
• City of Oakland
David Ng, PE
Supervising Engineer
(510) 238-7267
[email protected]
Office Location
• 4699 Old Ironsides Drive, Suite #350
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Langan
The project team geotechnical engineer is
Langan, who has been involved with the
environmental and geotechnical aspects of
the Oyster Point project over the past 15
years. They have performed numerous
studies to evaluate the existing landfill, clay
cap, and underlying subsurface conditions.

Currently, Langan is overseeing regrading
of the landfill and construction of new
streets and utilities as part of the Phase IC
improvements, on behalf of the City. With
their experience at the site, Langan has
developed an investigation plan that limits
the field investigations needed to obtain the
needed design data, while also identifying
additional investigations that have been
necessary during the Phase IC permitting
process that is not requested in this RFP.

Langan will be responsible for preparing the
geotechnical report for the project, providing
recommendations to the design team. In
addition, they will prepare the needed postclosure landfill development plan and process it with San Mateo County
Environmental Health Services (SMCEHS)
and the Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB). During construction, they
will observe the project and prepare the
needed report for both agencies.

Staffing
The following proposed staff are available to
work on this project:
• John Gouchon: Project Principal,
Geotech
• Jeff Ludlow: Project Principal,
Environmental
• Justin Ray: Project Manager
• Hayley Farr: Project Engineer
References
• City of South San Francisco
Eunejune Kim, PE
Director of Public Works
(650) 877-8551
[email protected]
• City of Brisbane
Randy Breault, PE
Director of Public Works
(415) 508-2130
[email protected]
• City of Oakland
David Ng, PE
Supervising Engineer
(510) 238-7267
[email protected]
Office Location
• 135 Main Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94105
TJC and Associates, Inc.

The project electrical engineer is TJC and
Associates, Inc. (TJCAA). They provide
instrumentation, controls and electrical
design services that involve evaluation,
planning and design of facility and industrial
electrical applications. These services

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
include electrical power distribution and
industrial motor control. TJCAA has worked
with Schaaf & Wheeler on several pump
station projects in the Bay Area. In addition,
they have also worked with municipalities
and utility districts to upgrade aging
electrical distribution equipment.

TJCAA will be responsible for the design of
electrical design of the pump station
equipment and the relocation and upgrade
of the electrical switchgear equipment.

Staffing
The following proposed staff are available to
work on this project:
• Paul J. Giorsetto, P.E.: Project
Principal
• Anne Broughton, PE: Senior Electrical
Engineer
References
• City of South San Francisco
Eunejune Kim, PE
Director of Public Works
(650) 877-8551
[email protected]
• City of Brisbane
Randy Breault, PE
Director of Public Works
(415) 508-2130
[email protected]
• City of Oakland
David Ng, PE
Supervising Engineer
(510) 238-7267
[email protected]
Office Location
• 1111 Broadway, Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94607
Biggs Cardosa Associates
The project team structural engineer is
Biggs Cardosa Associates (BCA). BCA was
the structural designer for several City of
South San Francisco pump stations. They
also served as the structural engineer for
evaluating the wall options studied by the
City for the Harbor Master Spit project at
Oyster Point. Biggs will apply this recent
experience in low capacity soils, settlement
and landfill construction to the design and
value engineering of the Oyster Point Pump
Station.

BCA will be responsible for the structural
design of the pump station slab, wet well,
pump house foundation and the CMU
structure.

Staffing
The following proposed staff are available to
work on this project:
• Anthony Notaro: Project Manager
• Engineering support staff
References
• Midpeninsula Regional Open Space
District
Scott Reeves
Senior Capital Project
(650) 772-3645
[email protected]
• City of Sunnyvale
Jennifer Ng, PE
Assistant City Engineer
(408) 730-7430
[email protected]
Office Location
• 869 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
Advanced Geological Services
Advanced Geological Services, Inc. (AGS)
was formed in 1995 to provide innovative
geophysical imaging and consulting
services to the environmental, engineering
and construction industries. AGS routinely
uses ground penetrating radar (GPR), timedomain electromagnetic (EM), frequencydomain EM, and electrical resistivity methods for locating underground features.

AGS has worked with Wilsey Ham on
numerous sanitary sewer projects, including
in San Bruno, Berkeley, and South San
Francisco.

Staffing
The following proposed staff are available to
work on this project:
• Pierre Armand, Senior Geophysicist
Office Location
• 1605 School Street
Moraga, CA 94556

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202

2.2 Organization Chart
The organizational chart at the end of this
section provides a visual illustration of our
team’s structure, including our
subconsultants. The team member’s role is
shown under each person’s name.

2.3 Project Management
Approach
Subconsultant Management &
Coordination
Our subconsultants for pump station design,
electrical, structural, utility location, and
geotechnical services play an integral role in
our ability to meet the City’s schedule
needs. We fully understand that time is of
the essence for the proposed work. To
succeed, our entire team must accomplish
their tasks in accordance with our proposed
schedule.

Wilsey Ham has included subconsultants on
our team with whom we have a track record
of success, and are proven team members
for accomplishing project goals. The ability
to meet the deadlines in our proposed
schedule was a discussed with each
subconsultant and their commitment to
meet the schedule was a condition to be on
our team. We have developed internal
deadlines for our team that are more
aggressive than our proposed schedule to
meet the City’s schedule goals, while
providing ourselves with some buffer. To
monitor our progress, our Project Managers
will conduct a bi-weekly call with each
subconsultant to make sure their work is on
track, and to help us address any
unexpected delays.

We require that our subconsultants provide
us with a three-week rolling schedule so
that we can keep the City apprised of our
planned work areas. The work product of
each subconsultant is reviewed by our
Project Manager to make sure they have
fulfilled their project obligation and have not
missed any required evaluation area.

Our staff will perform occasional site visits
to verify that our subconsultants are using
proper traffic control utility marking and
soils investigation operations. This is critical
to ensure the safety of workers and the
general public.

In summary, these key steps help us
manage our subconsultants: 1) upfront
schedule commitment; 2) ongoing
communication throughout the project; 3)
rolling schedule updates; and 4) checking
their work.

Schedule Management
We monitor our internal project schedules
on a weekly basis to assess our progress
relative to the schedule. If we need to
assign additional staff or work overtime, we
prefer to do that early in the process to get
us back on schedule as opposed to waiting
until later in the project.

Project Communications
Our Principal Engineer, Brandon Davis, will
be our point of contact with the City for all
contract issues and has overall
responsibility to ensure that the City is
satisfied with our services.

Our Project Manager, Eric Cohen, will be
the primary point of contact with the City for
all of the day-to-day project communications
and coordination. He will attend all project
meetings with the City and has full
responsibility for our team’s project
development and work product as well as
our on-time delivery.

We view the City’s Project Manager (CPM)
as the key contact for the City who will
provide our team with project direction,
feedback, comments, decisions and
approvals. We understand that the CPM
must be kept apprised of all of our project
activity. Due to the current demands placed
upon the City’s engineers, we understand
that the CPM may delegate some of their
duties and responsibilities to other City staff
or consultants, and in that case we would
then modify our communications
accordingly to meet the CPMs direction. If
allowed by the CPM, our Project Engineers
will also have direct communication with

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
City representatives for information requests
and other tasks. In summary, we envision
all project direction and decisions will be
exchanged between our Project Manager
and the City’s Project Manager, or their
designee.

2.4Quality Assurance/
Quality Control
Controlling our product quality helps control
construction costs.

One of the primary responsibilities of our
PM is to monitor the contract documents as
they are being prepared to avoid any
significant errors in the design approach
and plan preparation methods.

For design review submittals, our PM will
carefully review the entire plan set to make
sure that the plans are accurate, make
sense, and are consistent throughout the
plans, estimates and specifications.

Everything is highlighted after it has been
reviewed so that we know we have not
missed anything.

When the PM is satisfied with the plans and
specifications, they are submitted to the
Project Principal for checking. The Project
Principal, who has the most project and
design experience, repeats this detailed
process of review and highlighting.

For the final review submittal, the entire
QA/QC process outlined above is repeated.

In addition, quantities between the plans,
estimate and bid schedule are checked to
make sure there is not a bust. The plans are
crosschecked against the bid schedule to
make sure that every work item proposed
on the plans is described and included in a
bid item for payment. This is a critical step
to make sure that no work items are
overlooked. Lastly, the pay description of
the unit of measure for each item in the
specifications is checked against the bid
schedule to make sure they are consistent
and to eliminate this potential loophole for a
Contractor to claim an extra.

Glen Anderson
Project Manager
Schaaf & Wheeler
Robert Hutton
Supervising
Surveyor
Eric Cohen, PE
Project Manager
Wilsey Ham
Brandon Davis, PE
Principal Engineer
Wilsey Ham
City of South San Francisco
Matthew Ruble, PE
Principal Engineer
Engineering Dept.

Support Staff
Wilsey Ham
South San Francisco Oyster Point SanitarySewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202

Paul Giorsetta
Principal Engineer
TJCAA
Justin Ray
Project Manager
Langan
Anthony Notaro
Project Manager
Biggs Cardosa

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202

3 Scope of Work

3.1 Understanding
We understand that the City of South San
Francisco is re questing proposals to
relocate the vacuum/ejector pump station
and the electrical switch gear cabinet at the
Oyster Point Marina. The marina is being
redeveloped to improve the public
infrastructure, improve public access,
address sea level rise and add new
buildings, including a biotechnology campus
and a 350-room hotel. The existing pump
station and switch gear are currently located
within the future buildout alignment of
Marina Blvd, several feet lower than the
projected future sea-level rise elevations. In
addition, they are in conflict with the future
hotel access at the eastern edge of the
hotel parcel. The City would like to relocate
the pump station and the switchgear cabinet
prior to the commencement of hotel
construction in mid-June 2025.

Figure 1 Existing vacuum pumps located within the
pump house.

The existing sewer collection system for the
east basin of the Oyster Point Marina
consists of a series of vacuum pipes
servicing each of the facilities to the east of
the Harbor Master Road, including the
Harbor Master Building. The vacuum pipes,
installed in the early 1980’s, are connected
to two vacuum pumps and a vacuum tank
located within the existing pump station.

When activated, the vacuum pumps and
tank create a negative pressure within the
vacuum pipes, drawing sanitary sewer
wastewater from each of the
aforementioned facilities and discharging
the effluent into a wet well located within the
pump house. Two additional ejector pumps
located within the wet well turn on
periodically to discharge the wastewater to
a City maintained sewer pump to the west.

Figure 2 Vacuum tank located within the existing
pump house.

The vacuum/pump is maintained by the
Harbor District but it is our understanding
that the City will maintain the new pump

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
station. The new pump station will be
moved to a location chosen by the City.

In addition to relocating and reconstructing
the pump station, the adjacent electrical
switchgear will also need to be moved.

Much like the pump station, this switchgear
serves the entire Oyster Point Marina east
of Harbor Master Road. This includes
powering lights, irrigation, the Harbor
Master Building, the Yacht Club, restrooms,
live-aboard docks and other marina
facilities. The existing configuration includes
PG&E joint trench in Marina Blvd. to a
transformer located across the street from
the switchgear. The power runs from the
transformer to an adjacent PG&E cabinet,
where it is metered. The power then runs
across the road in conduit to the switchgear
cabinet, where it is distributed to the existing
facilities throughout the east basin. The new
switchgear will be moved to a location
chosen by the City.

Figure 3 Existing switchgear in the center with the
vacuum/ejector pump station on the right. The
realigned Marina Blvd. is to the left, roughly 4 to 5-feet higher in elevation.

The existing infrastructure is located over an
existing closed landfill that consists of solid
waste covered by a impermeable clay cap.

Title 27 of the state regulations requires that
any work that disturbs the clay cap will need
to repair it to be compliant. Since the project
will install a new wet well, it is a near
certainty that the clay cap will be penetrated
and landfill waste will be excavated and offhauled. In addition, the soil conditions of landfill waste over bay mud makes the site
extremely susceptible to ground settlement.

These site conditions will need to be
evaluated and addressed in the design.

The City has broken down the required
professional services into the following
tasks:
• Perform site investigations, including an
as-needed topographic survey to
prepare an Existing Site Conditions Plan
identifying existing facilities and sewer
mains served by the pump;
• Evaluate the existing vacuum
station/ejector pump infrastructure and
sewer lines to determine the feasibility
of converting the new pump station into
a traditional pressure system;
• Perform geotechnical investigations and
prepare a landfill post-closure plan;
• Prepare conceptual plans;
• Prepare construction documents; and
• Perform bidding and construction
support services.

Given the nature of the project, it is
imperative that the selected consultant(s)
work closely with the City as a team
member to minimize disruption to the
marina and its inhabitants while
constructing the new infrastructure within
the time frame identified by the City. To this
end, we believe that several key
components of the project must be
executed very well in order to achieve
success. These components include:
• The existing sewer infrastructure data
must be completely understood and
documented to enable a thorough
evaluation of the system.

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
• The design must take into account the
time it will take to switchover to the new
equipment to minimize the time the
power is down in the east basin.
• Each phase of the project (conceptual,
construction document and
construction) must be well-managed to
ensure that the data gathering, design,
and construction are executed in the
most cost effective and consistent
manner.
• The design team will need to
communicate regularly with the City’s
project manager and team to keep them
apprised of the project status and issues
to resolve.

In light of this understanding, Wilsey Ham
proposes the following approach to
providing design services to the City.

3.2 General Approach
Project Initiation
When notified to proceed by the City, we will
schedule a kickoff meeting with the City
Engineering, Water Quality Control Plant
(WQCP) O&M staff and the project team to
review project scope, goals, and strategies.

This meeting will allow us to come to an
understanding as to the City’s wants and
needs for the pump station replacement,
which can be incorporated into the design
moving forward. At this meeting, we will
collect pertinent information from the City
including record drawings, GIS maps of the
sewer system, storm drain and other Cityowned utility records. We willalso perform a site reconnaissance visit to inspect and
photograph the existing station, switchgear
and existing facilities and evaluate the
potential relocation areas on site. This will
help our team determine the best approach
for studying the feasibility of converting the
system into a traditional force main system.

The preliminary project schedule will be
updated to confirm the agreed-upon project
delivery. Project schedules will be revised to
help meet special deadlines when
requested.

Record Search and Site
Investigations
After the project has been initiated, we will
immediately begin to research existing
records and perform a site investigation.

We currently have base map information
from several of our projects in the area,
including topographic surveys from the
Phase 2C and Harbor Master Spit. We will
supplement these surveys with a field
survey performed in the new pump station
location chosen by the City. For any work
needed on the sewer piping from the harbor
facilities to the new pump station, existing
aerial should be sufficient for design. A
small contingency of survey budget will be
saved for any conform grading that is
needed during design.

We will request new utility records from the
utility companies to add to our base maps.

We do not anticipate there being any public
utilities other than water (Calwater) since
the PG&E joint trench ends at the pump
station. To help find the private utilities, our
utility locator, AGS, will perform GPR
locating on site, marking any utilities found
with paint. They have experience previously
locating existing utilities for the Phase 1C
project and understand the conditions. With
the GPR, our intent is to determine depths
to the pipes, although if the pipes are below
the clay cap they could be difficult to
identify. Our survey crews will follow AGS
and shoot the paint marks to add to our
base maps.

We do not recommend potholing at this
time due to the uncertainties of the exact
location of the clay cap. If a potholing
contractor penetrated the clay cap, then the
remediation could be costly. Considering
the lower volume of existing utilities in the
east basin, we believe any potholing should
occur once construction has begun and a
post-closure plan has been approved.

When our base mapping has been
completed, we will perform a site visit to
confirm the findings, revising them as
needed.

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Pump Station Evaluation and Design
As mentioned previously, the existing pump
station is a combination vacuum/ejector
pump system. The vacuum pumps and
tanks create a negative pressure in the
sewer discharge pipes, drawing the
wastewater from the marina facilities into
the wet well. The City would like the
designers to evaluate this vacuum and
determine the feasibility of converting to a
traditional system.

Our initial thoughts are that the existing
vacuum style of pump station is seldom
used by utility agencies due to the
complexity of the mechanical systems and
reliability concerns. In addition to these
concerns, any break or leak in the vacuum
line can lead to drawing groundwater into
the sewer pipeline, and drastically increase
station inflows. Considering that this system
was built 40 years ago and perhaps within a
closed landfill, we would recommend
moving away from vacuum pumps for the
new pump station.

Our team, led by Schaaf & Wheeler, will
perform an evaluation of alternative pump
station configurations, including the
vacuum/ejector system. Due to the
concerns stated above and the probability of
needing to rebuild the existing 40-year old
piping system, we will most likely
recommend converting to a traditional pump
station with small sump pumps at the harbor
facilities to replace the vacuum system.

After the evaluation, our team will prepare
conceptual plans proposing to construct a
new pump station as recommended,
relocating the station as directed by the
City. Based on the relatively small size of
the station, the following improvements are
anticipated:
• Construction of a new centralized pump
station, consisting of a precast concrete
wet well, approximately five feet in
diameter, and approximately 10 to 20
feet below grade with submersible, railmounted pumps.
• Construction of a new CMU electrical
building, adjacent to the wet well to
house the proposed motor control
center and switchgear. The station can
be equipped with a manual or automatic
transfer switch, to allow for generator
operation.
o It is anticipated that the
station would be equipped
with the City’s typical alarms
for sewer pump stations.
• Each of the buildings currently served
by the vacuum pipe system will need to
be equipped with a small sump pump
system to convey building flows to the
centralized pump station.
o A generic alarm for each of
these stations would be
routed to the centralized
station, if desired by the City.

A Basis of Design (BOD) technical
memorandum will be prepared to
summarize the results of the meeting with
WQCP O&M and our recommendations
from the findings of the vacuum station
evaluation. The BOD memo will identify
pump station alternatives and the
equipment that is proposed to be installed in
the new station. Conceptual plans and a
cost estimate will be prepared for each
alternative to document selection of the
preferred pump station relocation plan. This
document will also note potential
constructability issues, operational phasing,
utility conflicts and permitting requirements.

We will rely on the design inflow
requirements established in the RFP to set
the firm pumping capacity and evaluate
pump performance over the range of
expected operation for the life of the project.

Once the BOD memo and conceptual plans
are approved, we will move into the
construction document phase.

Electrical Switchgear
As mentioned above, relocation of the
station will include a new switchgear. It is
important to note that the existing
switchgear serving the station also serves
most of the remaining areas east of the

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Harbor Master Road that are not being
redeveloped. In order to ensure that these
areas maintain electrical service, the new
switchgear will need to be sized to
accommodate these loads. Furthermore,
the existing electrical feeds (from the
existing switchgear to the buildings), will
need to be located in the field so that the
existing conduits can be intercepted.

Junction boxes will be installed at the
intercept location to eliminate the need for
pulling of new wires.

The new switchgear can be installed within
the new electrical building at the City’s
direction. The existing switchgear has
suffered deterioration due to being exposed
to a marine environment over the last 40
years. Placing inside the CMU building
would provide additional protection to the
equipment.

Conceptual plans for the relocation of the
switchgear will be prepared along with a
section in the BOD memo summarizing the
proposed options.

Force Main
If the City agrees that the existing vacuum
piping is unreliable and that a new force
main and sump pump system force main is
preferred, we will prepare a conceptual plan
force main set to be included with the BOD
memo. A new force main system will be laid
out to each harbor facility with sewer
service. A sump pump will be included at
each of the service connection points. We
will lay out one force main with a connection
point for each ejector pump needed. To
allow for future development, we will
coordinate with the City to install capped
ends where the force main could be
expanded in the future. Blow-off valves
would be installed at these ends to allow for
maintenance.

Since the site is a closed landfill, we are
limited in the types of piping that we can
use. For this application, the HDPE
C901/C906 will most likely be the
recommended pipe material. The fused pipe
ends that lack joints allow for a pipe system
with essentially no infiltration, and have
proven to have a long service life in these
environments.

Our previous work on the site has given us
an advantage in understanding where the
existing clay cap is located. We will evaluate
our existing data on the elevations of the
clay cap to blayout the best new force main
pipe alignments to avoid penetrating the cap
to the greatest extent practical. While
penetrating an existing clay cap is not
always avoidable, limiting it can save the
City from having to perform too many costly
clay cap repairs. Although we will try to
avoid these repairs, we will work with
Langan to develop a detail for partial and
full clay cap penetration repairs, including
an alternative bid item in the construction
documents to price the repairs. The detail
will be based on previously approved
designs by the regulatory agencies. This will
help protect the City by keeping contractor
change orders for repairs within a
competitively bid unit price.

Geotechnical and Environmental
Langan Engineering and Environmental
Services, Inc. (Langan) has been involved
with the environmental and geotechnical
aspects of the planning and development of
Oyster Point over the past 15 years. They
have performed numerous studies to
evaluate the existing landfill, clay cap, and
underlying subsurface conditions.

Langan will use the existing subsurface data
in their files, along with their experience and
expertise regarding landfill redevelopment
and pump station design to support the
relocation of the existing sanitary sewer
pump station. For this project Langan will:
• Prepare a geotechnical investigation
report and environmental post-closure
development plan per the requirements
of Title 27 California Code of
Regulations (CCR);
• perform oversight related to the
environmental and geotechnical aspects
of construction.

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Geotechnical
We anticipate a review of existing
subsurface data available in our team’s files
will show that the proposed pump station
site is underlain by fill (landfill cover,
generally consisting of a heterogeneous mix
of sand, silt, gravel, and clay cap) over
refuse, Bay Mud, stiff clay and dense sand,
that is all situated over bedrock. The
thickness of the refuse layer is on the order
of 30 feet. The Bay Mud is about 80 feet
thick, and bedrock is about 180 feet below
ground surface.

Using the subsurface information from
previous investigations, Langan will perform
engineering studies to develop conclusions
and recommendations regarding:
• Soil and groundwater conditions at the
site;
• Most appropriate foundation type(s) for
the proposed structures;
• Design criteria for the appropriate
foundation types, including appropriate
depth, allowable bearing pressure,
modulus of subgrade reactions, and
lateral capacity, as appropriate;
• Estimates of total and differential
settlement of new foundations under
design loads;
• Site seismicity and seismic hazards,
including liquefaction and associated
hazards;
• Lateral earth pressures for design of
below-grade walls;
• Excavation, dewatering, and temporary
slopes;
• Repairing the low permeability layer
(clay cap), where penetrated;
• Temporary shoring system;
• Seismic design criteria in accordance
with 2019 and 2022 California Building
Code (CBC);
• Site grading and criteria for fill
placement and compaction;
• Soil subgrade preparation; and
• Construction considerations.

They will provide the conclusions and
recommendations in a draft written report,
which will also include a project site
description, vicinity map, site map, and
boring logs. An electronic version of the
draft report will be sent to the project team
and the City for review.

Environmental
Regulatory oversight of the Oyster Point
Landfill falls under the San Mateo County
Environmental Health Services (SMCEHS)
Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) as well as
the Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB). Vertical developments overlying
the landfill are required to submit a Postclosure Development Plan (PCDP) and Application detailing how the proposed
project will comply with Title 27 CCR landfill
post-closure development standards. The
PCDP will contain information regarding soil
management (including clay cap repair
during construction), foundation installation,
landfill gas mitigation, and utility settlement
monitoring and repair.

We anticipate gaining SMCEHS and
RWQCB approval of the PCDP will likely
take several months and require meetings
and correspondence to address questions.

Langan will prepare up to two iterations of
the PCDP (draft and final) and attend up to
five 2-hour meetings with the project team
and regulatory agencies to discuss the
PCDP. For each 2-hour meeting, we have
assumed 3 hours total (2-hour meeting plus
1-hour travel/preparation) for one
environmental project manager and one
environmental staff.

Based on the limited footprint of the
proposed pump station site, we have
assumed dust monitoring will not be
required as part of this project and that dust
control measures included in the PCDP will
be sufficient.

Further, based on our recent experience on
other similar projects, we assume that the
full County PCDP application fee will not be

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
required and that County PCDP review time
will be billed at their hourly rate directly to
the City (County review fees not included in
this proposal).

Structural
Biggs Cardosa Associates (BCA) will
provide structural services for the project.

They will provide structural calculations for
the pump house foundation, wet well, and
CMU building. The foundation for the
building will be the most critical aspect of
the structural design. Being over landfill and
80-feet of bay mud, settlement will be a
critical item to incorporate into the design.

Construction Document Phase
60% Design
At the initiation of the design phase, we will
continue with design development and
detailed civil, mechanical and electrical
design. Design will reflect those items
identified in the basis of design report and
by field conditions. With the existing utilities
identified, the affected utility owners will be
contacted to determine design requirements
with respect to their utility and, if necessary,
relocation and construction restrictions. As
mentioned above, the only utility we
anticipate in the vicinity of the new pump
station that is not owned by the City of
South San Francisco are Cal Water water
mains.

If permits from outside agencies are
required, the permit process will be initiated
at this time. Since outside agency review
can greatly impact the schedule, scope and
cost of a project, early project involvement
by the affected agencies is paramount for a
successful project. We have learned to
request the maximum time allowed for each
regulatory permit even if it far exceeds the
time needed for a project. That way if the
project is delayed, the permit may still be
active at a later date. This can help avoid
the additional time and expense of
requesting a permit extension or a new
permit.

Preliminary plans, technical specifications,
estimates, calculations and schedule will be
submitted to the City as part of the 60%
plan package.

Final Design
Upon receipt of City comments on the 60%
design, Wilsey Ham and our subconsultants will prepare the detailed plans, specifications and construction estimate.

The improvement plans will include plan
and profile views as well as construction
details.

We will develop a design with careful
attention to detail to ensure that the
proposed improvements match the facilities
and existing improvements at conform
points.

The technical specifications will be
developed using the City’s standard format
and will be packaged with the City’s Notice
to Bidders, Bid Schedule, General
Specifications and Special Provisions. The
Special Provisions will be prepared to
address the required work hours, provisions
for pedestrian and vehicular access,
protection of existing improvements,
measurement and payment, and other
requirements that will facilitate the
management of the construction. The
construction cost estimate will also be
updated.

At each submittal, the Construction
Document package will be submitted to the
City for their review and comment. After the
City’s review, Wilsey Ham will meet with the
City to go over their comments. Wilsey Ham
will address the City’s comments in the next
PS&E package submittal and a written
response to City comments will be provided.

After the PS&E set is complete, the entire
package will be thoroughly checked through
our quality control process, as described in
Section 2 of this proposal. This final PS&E
package will then be submitted to the City
for their review. After the City’s review, any
remaining City comments will be addressed
and the Bid Package will be issued for bid.

Bid Phase Support

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Engineering support during the bidding
phase of a project includes:
• Attendance at the pre-bid meeting
• Response to bidder inquires
• Preparation of bid addenda
• Contractor bid and qualifications review
• Summarize bids and recommend award
of project
Construction Support Services
During the Construction Phase of a project,
good communication with the project team,
Agency and Contractor aids achieving
construction schedules.

We provide timely reviews of submittals,
shop drawings and written responses to
Contractor RFI’s to keep construction
moving in a timely fashion. In addition to
coordinating with the City throughout the
construction phase, our engineers will
conduct site visits to review the construction
effort as it relates to the design intent. Upon
construction completion, our team will use
the contractor markups to create the Record
Drawings.

The following is a detailed summary of our
proposed scope of work for the project.

3.3 Scope of Services
Task 1 – Project Management
• Attend a kickoff meeting and perform a
site visit.
• Perform overall project coordination.
• Perform QA/QC reviews and revisions
of the conceptual plans, BOD memo,
60%, 90% and 100% PS&E contract
documents.
• Develop and update project schedule.

Monitor schedule and budget.
• Coordination with sub-consultants.
• Identify and coordinate with
stakeholders, specifically the San Mateo
Harbor District and the hotel property
developer.
• Project management for subconsultants.

Task 1 Deliverables
Project schedule will be provided in
electronic (PDF) format.

Task 1 Schedule
An updated project schedule will be
provided at the beginning of the project and
as requested.

Task 2 – Record Search and Site
Investigation
• Obtain record utility information from the
utility companies.
• Perform utility locating using GPR and
other electronic methods. Pick up
marking with field survey.
• Perform supplemental topographic field
survey of the pump station location.
• Set up base map in CAD.
• Perform site visit to review the existing
conditions. Revise base maps in CAD
based on field findings.
• Review record data of the pump station
and landfill record drawings.

Task 2 Deliverables
None
Task 2 Schedule
Task 2 will take roughly 1-month.

Task 3 – Conceptual Design and
Basis of Design
• Prepare conceptual pump station plans
with alternatives included.
• Prepare conceptual electrical switchgear
relocation plans.
• Prepare conceptual force main and
sump pump plans.
• Prepare conceptual engineer’s cost
estimate.
• Prepare Basis of Design technical
memorandum.
• Meet with City to review BOD memo
and conceptual plans.

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Task 3 Deliverables
Draft technical memorandum and final
technical memorandum will be provided in
electronic (PDF) format. Conceptual plans
will be provided in PDF format.

Task 3 Schedule
Task 3 will take roughly 2-months.

Task 4 – Geotechnical and
Environmental Services
• Perform geotechnical studies.
• Prepare geotechnical report.
• Prepare Post-closure Development
Plan.
• Coordinate with regulatory agencies,
including attending up to five one-hour
meetings.

Task 4 Deliverables
The Geotechnical Report and the Postclosure Development Plan will be provided in electronic (PDF) format.

Task 5 Schedule
The Geotechnical Report will take roughly
2-months. The Post-closure Development
Plan will be prepared with the 90% PS&E
package.

Task 5 – Contract Documents
• Prepare 60% pump station plans.
• Prepare 60% electrical switchgear
relocation plans.
• Prepare 60% force main and sump
pump plans.
• Prepare technical specifications.
• Update engineer’s cost estimate.
• Submit 60% PS&E package to City.
• Meet with City to review 60% PS&E
package.
• Address City comments on Plans and
develop to 90%.
• Address City comments on estimate and
develop to 90%.
• Address City comments on technical
specifications and develop 90%.
• Prepare Contract Book.
• Submit 90% PS&E package to City.
• Meet with City to review 90% PS&E
package.
• Address City comments on 90% PS&E
package and develop to 100% PS&E.
• Submit 100% PS&E package to City for
Bidding.

Task 5 Deliverables
60%, 90% and 100% PS&E Packages will
be provided in electronic (PDF) format.

Task 5 Schedule
60% PS&E package will take roughly 2-
months. 90% PS&E package will take
roughly 2-months. 100% PS&E package will
take roughly 3-weeks.

Task 6 – Public Bidding/Construction
Support Services
• Attend pre-bid meeting.
• Respond to bidders questions.
• Issue up to two bid addenda.
• Attend pre-construction meeting.
• Review and approve submittals.
• Review and respond to RFIs.
• Review and respond to C.O. requests.
• Prepare minor plan revisions to address
field conditions.
• Perform substantial completion
inspection and prepare punchlist.
• Prepare record drawings.
• Provide geotechnical and environmental
observation during construction.
• Prepare PCDP Completion Report.
•
Task 5 Deliverables
Bid Addenda, submittal reviews, RFI
reviews, C.O. reviews, minor plan revisions,
punchlist, record drawings and PCDP
Completion Report will be provided in
electronic (PDF) format.

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
Task 5 Schedule
As needed by the City.

3.4 Budget and Schedule
Management
Cost Control and Budget
Management
The Project Manager will be responsible for
performing an earned value analysis each
month with the billing cycle. This analysis
will check the percent used of the budget for
the project against the planned used budget
at the end of the month. This will help us
determine if our burn rate is higher than the
production rate and how efficient we have
been with the budget up to that point. If we
find that the burn rate is higher than the
production rate, we will make adjustments
to improve our efficiency.

Schedule Management
To help perform the earned value analysis,
the Project Manager will prepare a monthly
progress schedule. This schedule will help
determine if the budget being used is
consistent with the project progress being
made. If it is found that the planned
progress is not meeting the actual progress
made for the project, adjustments will be
made to bring the project back on schedule.

Breakdown of Hours
See next page for breakdown of the total
hours proposed for this project.

S&W LANGAN TJCAA BCA AGS TOTAL

SUB- SUB- SUB- SUB- SUB- WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS HOURS

1. Project Management
1 Kick-off Meeting and site visit 18 0 28 0 12
2 Project Coordination 23 0 55 0 20
3 Quality Control Reviews and Revisions 32 0 51 0 52
4 Develop & Monitoring Schedule, Monitor Budget 9 0 18 0 24 5 Sub-consultant Coord 0 62 0 0 16
6 Coord with City of SSF 28 0 18 0 28
7 Identify & conduct outreach to stakeholders 0 0 0 0 16 8 Project Management for Sub-Consultants 9 0 0 0 0
9 Reimbursibles 0 0 3 0 0
120 62 174 0 0 168

2. Record Search and Site Investigation
1 Obtain Record Utility Information 14 0 0 0 11
2 Utility locating (optional) 0 0 0 0 24 40
3 Perform topographic field survey 0 0 0 0 29
4 Set up project base map 0 0 0 0 11
5 Perform site visit to review ex conditions, revise base maps 23 0 18 0 6 6 Review record data 25 14 32 0 5
7 Reimbursibles 5 0 5 5 0
67 14 55 5 24 102

3. Conceptual Design and Basis of Design
1 Prepare conceptual Pump Station Plans 83 39 0 0 18
2 Prepare conceptual Electrical Switchgear Relocation Plans 9 0 55 0 5 3 Prepare conceptual force main and sump pump plans 0 0 0 0 45 4 Prepare conceptual engineer's cost estimate 18 0 51 0 9 5 Prepare Basis of Design Memo 69 0 55 0 22
6 Meet with City to review BOD 5 0 18 0 4
7 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
184 39 179 0 0 103

4. Geotechnical and Environmental Services
1 Perform geotechnical Studies 0 0 0 0 0
2 Prepare geotechnical report 0 67 0 0 8
3 Prepare Postclosure Development Plan 0 75 0 0 18
4 Coordinate with regulatory agencies 0 35 0 0 4
5 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0
0 176 0 0 0 30
5 Contract Documents
1 Prepare 60% Pump Station Plans 145 25 0 0 26
2 Prepare 60% Elec. Switchgear Relocation Plans 14 0 336 0 18 3 Prepare 60% Force Main and Sump Pump Plans 69 0 0 0 110 4 Prepare technical specifications 78 0 129 0 28
5 Update engineers cost estimate 23 0 0 0 7
6 Submit 60% PS&E package to City 9 0 0 0 7
7 Meet with City to review 60% PS&E package 5 0 0 0 4
7 Address City Comments on Plans,develop to 90% 78 0 8 232 72 8 Address City Comments on estimate, develop to 90% 9 0 8 0 7 9 Address City comments on tech specs, develop to 90% 23 0 25 114 9 10 Prepare contract book 0 0 0 0 34
11 Submit 100% PS&E ro City for Bidding 5 0 5 0 7
12 Meet with City to review 90% PS&E package 28 0 14 0 4 13 Address City Comments on 90% PS&E, finalize 100% PS&E 14 0 9 92 41 14 Submit 100% PS&E ro City for Bidding 0 0 0 0 7
15 Reimbursibles 0
499 25 534 438 0 381
6 Public Bidding/Construction Support Services
1 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 5 0 12 0 4
2 Respond to bidders questions 0 25 0 7 8
3 Issue up to two bid addenda 21 0 18 0 12
4 Attend Pre-Construction Meeting 9 5 18 0 4
5 Review and approve submittals (29 max) 106 25 110 37 40 6 Review and respond to RFIs (10 max) 16 25 21 23 18
7 Review and respond to C.O. requests (5 included) 16 0 9 0 10 8 Prepare minor plan rev's to address field conditions (3 max) 41 0 0 0 27 9 Perform substantial completion inspection, prep punchlist 18 0 0 0 12 10 Prepare record drawings 28 0 28 6 21
11 Provide Geotechand Environ. Observ during Construction 0 495 0 0 0 12 Prepare PCDP Completion Report 0 58 0 0 0
13 Reimbursables 0 0 0 0 0
260 633 216 72 0 156
GRAND TOTAL 1,129 949 1,158 515 24 940
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
City of South San Francisco
Oyster Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202 Task Hours
11/3/2022

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202

4 Schedule of Work

4.1 Schedule
Please see the following page for a detailed
schedule of the work planned to be
performed. The schedule includes the
critical path of the work items, start, finish
and predecessors. All tasks are shown with
each completion date.

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Contract Award 1 day Wed 1/11/23 Wed 1/11/23
2 NTP/Kick-off Meeting 1 day Thu 2/2/23 Thu 2/2/23
3 1. Records Research & Site Investigation29 days Mon 2/6/23 Thu 3/16/23 4 Obtain Record Utility Info 10 days Mon 2/6/23 Fri 2/17/23 5 Utility Locates 3 days Mon 2/20/23 Wed 2/22/23
6 Topo Field Survey 5 days Thu 2/23/23 Wed 3/1/23
7 Set Up Base Maps 3 days Thu 3/2/23 Mon 3/6/23
8 Site Visit & Update Base Maps 3 days Tue 3/7/23 Thu 3/9/23 9 Review Record Data 5 days Fri 3/10/23 Thu 3/16/23
10 2. Conceptual Design 37 days Mon 3/20/23 Tue 5/9/23
11 Prepare Concept Pump Sta Plans 20 days Mon 3/20/23 Fri 4/14/23 12 Prepare Concept Elect Switchgear Plans20 days Mon 3/20/23 Fri 4/14/23 13 Prepare Concept FM & SP Plans 20 days Mon 3/20/23 Fri 4/14/23 14 Prepare Concept Engr Cost Est 5 days Tue 4/11/23 Mon 4/17/23 15 Develop BOD 20 days Tue 3/21/23 Mon 4/17/23
16 Submit to City 1 day Tue 4/18/23 Tue 4/18/23
17 City Review & Meet w/ City 10 days Wed 4/19/23 Tue 5/2/23 18 Finalize & Resubmit 5 days Wed 5/3/23 Tue 5/9/23
19 3. Geotech & Environ Services 206 days Fri 2/17/23 Fri 12/1/23 20 Perform Geotech Studies 5 days Fri 2/17/23 Thu 2/23/23 21 Prepare Geotech Report 30 days Fri 2/24/23 Thu 4/6/23 22 Prepare Landfill Closure Plan 180 days Fri 3/3/23 Thu 11/9/23 23 Coord with Regulatory Agencies 155 days Fri 4/7/23 Thu 11/9/23 24 Submit to City 1 day Fri 11/10/23 Fri 11/10/23
25 City Review & Meet with Citry 10 days Mon 11/13/23Fri 11/24/23 26 Finalize & Resubmit 5 days Mon 11/27/23Fri 12/1/23
27 4. Contract Documents 154 days? Wed 5/10/23 Mon 12/11/23 28 Prepare 60% Pump Sta Plans 60 days Wed 5/10/23 Tue 8/1/23 29 Prepare 60% Elect Swithchgear Plans 60 days Wed 5/10/23 Tue 8/1/23 30 Prepare 60% FM/SP Plans 60 days Wed 5/10/23 Tue 8/1/23 31 Prepare Technical Specs 60 days Wed 5/10/23 Tue 8/1/23 32 Update Engr Constr Cost Est 5 days Wed 8/2/23 Tue 8/8/23 33 Submit to City 1 day Wed 8/9/23 Wed 8/9/23
34 City Review & Meet w/ City 1 day? Thu 8/10/23 Thu 8/10/23 35 Develop 90% Pump Sta Plans 60 days Fri 8/11/23 Thu 11/2/23 36 Develop 90% Elect Swithchgear Plans 60 days Fri 8/11/23 Thu 11/2/23 37 Develop 90% FM/SP Plans 60 days Fri 8/11/23 Thu 11/2/23 38 Develop 90% Technical Specs 60 days Fri 8/11/23 Thu 11/2/23 39 Update Engr Constr Cost Est 5 days Fri 10/27/23 Thu 11/2/23 40 Prepare Contract Book 10 days Fri 10/20/23 Thu 11/2/23 41 Submit to City 1 day Fri 11/3/23 Fri 11/3/23
42 City Review & Meet with Citry 15 days Mon 11/6/23 Fri 11/24/23 43 Address Comments & Finalize 100% PS&E10 days Mon 11/27/23Fri 12/8/23 44 Submit 100% PS&E for Bidding 1 day Mon 12/11/23Mon 12/11/23 45 6. Bidding & Constr Support 401 days Tue 1/2/24 Tue 7/15/25 46 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 1 day Tue 1/2/24 Tue 1/2/24
47 Respond to Bidder Questions 5 days Wed 1/3/24 Tue 1/9/24 48 Issue up to 2 Addendum 10 days Wed 1/3/24 Tue 1/16/24 49 Review/Respond to Submittals 5 days Wed 4/10/24 Tue 4/16/24 50 Review/Respond to RFI's 10 days Wed 4/10/24 Tue 4/23/24 51 Review/Respond to CO Requests 320 days Wed 4/17/24 Tue 7/8/25 52 Prepare Record Drawings 5 days Wed 7/9/25 Tue 7/15/25 53 7. Project Management 627 days Thu 2/2/23 Fri 6/27/25 54 Administration 627 days Thu 2/2/23 Fri 6/27/25
55 Monthly Progress Meeting 627 days Thu 2/2/23 Fri 6/27/25 65 Advertise 21 days Mon 1/8/24 Mon 2/5/24
66 Open Bids 1 day Tue 2/6/24 Tue 2/6/24
67 Council Approval/Contract Execution 1 day Wed 3/13/24 Wed 3/13/24 68 Contract Execution 20 days Thu 3/14/24 Wed 4/10/24
69 NTP 1 day Thu 4/11/24 Thu 4/11/24
1/11
4/18
11/10
8/9
11/3
12/11
1/2
12/25 1/15 2/5 2/26 3/19 4/9 4/30 5/21 6/11 7/2 7/23 8/13 9/3 9/24 10/15 11/5 11/26 12/17 1/7 1/28 2/18 3/10 3/31 4/21 5/12 6/2 6/23 7/14 8/4 8/25 9/15 10/6 10/27 11/17 12/8 12/29 1/19 2/9 3/2 3/23 4/13 5/4 5/25 6/15 7/6 November 21 January 11 March 1 April 21 June 11 August 1 September 21 November 11 January 1 February 21 April 11 June 1 July 21 September 11 November 1 December 21 February 11 April 1 May 21 July 11 Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
Deadline
Progress
City of South San Francisco
Oyster Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202 Preliminary Schedule

Project: 2022-10 Preliminary Sche
Date: Wed 11/2/22

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
5 Conflict of Interest Statement
Wilsey Ham currently has on-all agreements
with the City to provide consulting services
for the disciplines of Engineering,
Wastewater and Survey. Wilsey Ham is also
working directly for the City on the adjacent
Oyster Point Phase 2C Landscaping Project
and the Harbor Master Spit Project.

In addition, Wilsey Ham is currently working
for Kilroy Realty for the development of
Oyster Point Phase 1C and Phase 3C
Streets and Utilities projects.

We do not believe that these relationships
will have an impact on the final outcome of
the plan.

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
6 Litigation
Wilsey Ham has not been involved in any
litigation in connection with our projects over
the past ten years.

South San Francisco Oyster Point Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202
8 Resumes

8.1 Resume Index
Cohen, Eric – Wilsey Ham – Project Manager
Davis, Brandon – Wilsey Ham – Project Principal
Anderson, Glen – Schaaf & Wheeler – Project Manager
Anderson, Charles – Schaaf & Wheeler – Project Principal Giorsetto, Paul – TJC and Associates – Project Manager
Farr, Hayley – Langan – Project Engineer
Ray, Justin – Langan – Project Manager
Ludlow, Jeffrey – Langan – Project Principal, Environmental Gouchon, John – Langan – Project Principal, Geotech
Notaro, Anthony – Biggs Cardosa Associates
\Wilsey Ham, Inc.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Municipal Sewer Systems
Municipal Water Systems
Municipal Storm Drain
Systems
Pavement Design and
Street Reconstruction
Infrastructure Master Plans
Bike/Pedestrian Facilities
Plat Review and Approval
Project Presentation

REGISTRATION
Civil Engineer, RCE
California C77616
QSD/QSP, #23719, Ca
NASSCO PACP Certified

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Managing Engineer
Wilsey Ham, Inc.
2011– Present
Project Engineer
Green Valley Consulting
2010-2011
Project Engineer
Adobe Associates, Inc.
2006-2008

EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Key Personnel - Resume
Eric Cohen, PE, QSD, PACP
Supervising Engineer
ERIC COHEN has served as a Project Manager on a variety of municipal and commercial projects. His design experience includes sanitary sewer systems analysis, sanitary sewer pump stations, sewer video evaluation, gravity sewer design, sewer force main design, preparing construction documents and specifications, and providing construction management services. He has obtained his PACP certification from NASSCO for reviewing and analyzing sewer systems.

Eric will be the primary Project Manager on the Oyster Point Pump Station Project. Eric is a strong leader for the project design team and an effective communicator with our clients. In this role, he will prepare the scope of work and fee, provide guidance for our project engineers, manage the project design and provide quality control and quality assurance on all projects.

Some of Eric’s distinguishing qualifications include:
• Project Management for a variety of capital improvement projects • Sanitary sewer design and constructability analysis
• Knowledge of several type of sewer construction methods • Sewer video inspection analysis
• Trenchless installation methods
• Manhole inspection assessment
• Agency permitting
• Management and coordination of subconsultants
Some of Mr. Cohen’s recent projects include:
• South San Francisco Pump Station No. 1, City of South San Francisco • South San Francisco Pump Station No. 2, City of South San Francisco • Brisbane Lift Station No. 4, City o Brisbane
• Oyster Point Phase IC Streets and Utilities, City of SSF/Kilroy, CA • Oyster Point Phase 2C, City of South San Francisco
• Avenues 1-1 and 1-2 Water and Sewer, San Bruno, CA
• Hillsborough Parrot-Glenbrook-Melrose SS Rehabilitation, Town of Hillsborough
• San Carlos Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project, San Carlos, CA • PS#4 Sanitary Sewer Force Main Project, City of South San Francisco, CA
References include:
• Hae Won Ritchie, PE – City San Bruno - 650.616.7067 - [email protected],gov
• Javad Ghaffari – Town of Hillsborough - 650.627.6651 – [email protected]
Wilsey Ham, Inc.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Sanitary Sewer Collection
Streets & Highways
Green Infrastructure
Bikeways
Storm Drainage Systems
Underground Utility Design
Site Development
Special Districts Management

REGISTRATION
Civil Engineer, RCE C61024
California
QSD/QSP, #00159
California

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Supervising Engineer
Wilsey Ham, Inc.
1997 – Present

TRAINING AND

CERTIFICATIONS
National Storm Water Summit
ABAG NPDES Erosion Control
Seminar
Stormwater Pollution Prevention
and Stormwater Quality Control
Training

EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering
California State University, Chico
Key Personnel - Resume
BRANDON S. DAVIS, P.E., QSD
Principal Engineer
BRANDON DAVIS has acquired a wide range of engineering and management experience in his 25 years of civil engineering practice. He has served as the Principal Engineer and Project Manager on a wide range of sanitary sewer collection systems projects, including on pump station projects.

He has a strong understanding of pipe installation methods, including conventional open trench installation, pipe bursting, pipe-reaming and curedin-place pipe. In his role, he has had the ultimate responsibility for all phases of project development, including site investigation and master planning, development of construction documents for bidding, and construction administration. His broad range of experience gives him the ability to use his technical design skills to identify the potential impacts of design issues on a project as a whole and to identify possible solutions on projects with complicated constraints.

As Wilsey Ham’s Project Principal Engineer, Brandon will be responsible for entering into a contract with the City. In addition to ensuring all contractual obligations are met, Brandon will serve as a technical and managerial resource to the entire Wilsey Ham team in a supervisory role. Ultimately, the Principal Engineer ensures that quality services are being provided to our clients.

Some Mr. Davis's Projects include:
• South San Francisco Pump Station No. 1, City of South San Francisco • E. Burlingame Ave & Anza Bridge Utilities Improvements, City of Burlingame
• Park Plaza Dr., Southgate Ave., San Fernando Way, and Miriam Sy.

Sanitary Sewer Main Rehabilitation, City of Daly City
• South Rollins Road Utility Improvements, City of Burlingame • SR1 San Pedro Creek Bridge Replacement/Creek Widening, Pacifica, CA • East-West Connector Streets & Utilities, City of South San Francisco, CA • 2014-2015 Street Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Menlo Park, CA • Ralston Corridor Pedestrian Improvements & Traffic Analysis, Belmont, CA • San Pablo Avenue Green Stormwater Spine, Various, CA
• Old Town One-way Traffic Operations, City of San Pablo, CA • Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Resurfacing, Marin County, CA • Alhambra Avenue (North) Improvement Project, City of Martinez, CA References include:
• Kevin Okada, PE - City of Burlingame - 650.558.7213 - [email protected]
• Roland Yip, PE - City of Daly City – 650.991.8151 – [email protected] Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Glen M. Anderson, PE has 15 years of experience in sanitary sewer system, potable water, and stormwater assessment and design as well as the associated construction support and management associated with those projects. Glen has successfully completed work on several sanitary sewer main and trunk rehabilitation projects. He has worked on sanitary sewer pump station rehabilitation projects throughout the Bay Area.

Additionally, Glen has performed condition assessments for more than 150 sanitary sewer and stormwater pump stations. Glen’s potable water experience projects include the assessment and rehabilitation of booster pump stations, design of a water tanks and planning and design for potable water wells and pipelines. In addition to design, Glen has provided construction support and management services for a variety of projects, including wells, pipelines, storage tanks, pump stations, and generator installations.

Selected Project Experience
Wastewater Systems
Wastewater Pump Stations
Assessment (6 Stations)
Delta Diablo
Crestmoor and Lomita Pump
Stations and Forcemain
City of San Bruno
City of San Mateo Basin 2/3
– Pump Station
Rehabilitations
Stantec/City of San Mateo
Lift Stations J&K and D, F &
W
City of Morgan Hill
PSQ Reserve Flow and URD
Project
East Bay Municipal Utility
District
Assessment and Engineering
for Sanitary Sewer Main
Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
Force Main Appurtenance
Projects ESDC
Ross Valley Sanitary District
Cabrillo Avenue Sewer Main
Abandonment and
Replacement
City of Santa Clara
South Trunk Sewer Relief
Line
City of San Mateo
Madera Lift Stations (11 Lift
Stations
County of Madera
Mariner’s Island No. 5 and
No. 6 Pump Station
Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Repairs
City of Fontana
Pump Station Rehabilitations
City of Alameda
Sanitary Sewer Lift Station M
City of Morgan Hill
S. San Francisco Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station No. 8
Rehabilitation
City of S. San Francisco
City of San Mateo Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station
Assessment
City of San Mateo
Morgan Hill Trunk Sewer No.
2 City of Morgan Hill
Stormwater Systems
Baylands Stormwater Pump
Station No. 2
City of Sunnyvale
Rehabilitation of Failed 96”
Stormwater Corrugated Metal
Pipe
Town of Moraga
Education
BSCE, Civil and
Environmental Engineering,
University of California,
Davis
Licenses
Registered Civil Engineer,
California C76720
Certifications
NASSCO PACP, MACP, and
LACP Certified, Cert. No. U714-06021855
Affiliations
Pipe Users Group – NorCal
American Water Works
Association
Glen M. Anderson,
PE Vice President
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
O’Connor Pump Station
Improvement Feasibility
Study and Design
City of East Palo Alto
Vista Bella Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Half Moon
Bay
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar
Citrix Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Santa Clara
Kier & Wright
Silviera Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Gilroy
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar
Sears Point Stormwater
Pump Stations Design, 2
Stations
Ducks Unlimited, Inc.

Marsten Pump Station
City of Burlingame
San Francisquito Creek
Stormwater Pump Station
City of Palo Alto
Blanco Drain Stormwater
Pump Station
Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
Hope Street Stormwater
Pump Station
City of San Jose
Baylands Stormwater Pump
Station No. 1
City of Sunnyvale
Water Delivery Systems
Oak and Jones Water
System Planning
Summerhill Homes
Water System Planning and
Design
Confidential Client
Country Club and Victoria
Water Booster Pump Stations
City of Petaluma
Cherry Creek Water Pump
Station
City of Hillsborough
Assessment of City Wells
City of Santa Clara
Water System Modeling and
Design
Great Oaks Water Company
Watkins Gate Well and
Pipeline Project
Marina Coast Water District
Well 34 Site Improvements
Marina Coast Water District
Shady Lane Water System
Improvement
San Jose Water Company
Stonegate Water Supply
Project
County of San Benito
San Jerardo Water System
Improvements
County of Monterey
Segunda Pump Station Pump
replacement
California American Water
El Torro Wells
California American Water
Valley Christian School Pump
Station Rehabilitation
Valley Christian School
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Charles D. Anderson, PE has more than 30 years of experience in the areas of flood control and drainage, water supply and distribution, wastewater collection and pumping, surface water hydrology, and groundwater. As a project manager, he is involved in all phases of project management and implementation, from project feasibility to construction document preparation and construction support for a wide range of public and private clients.

He has completed numerous flood insurance studies (FIS) and letters of map revision (LOMRs) for FEMA. Chuck’s projects generally have multidisciplinary teams that help policy makers arrive at reliable decisions for protecting communities from flood risk and the threat of climate change, most particularly sea level rise. His San Mateo Bayfront Levee Improvement Project won state and regional awards.

Chuck demonstrates expertise in watershed and stochastic hydrology, open channel hydraulics, closed conduit hydraulics, pump station design, and storm drainage as well. His background also includes pipeline design, storage tank design, pump station design, hydraulic network modeling, wastewater collection includes septic systems, sanitary sewer design, pump station design, sanitary sewer modeling, and master planning.

Selected Project Experience
Water Supply, Storage, and
Distribution
Anderson Dam Seismic
Retrofit Project
Valley Water
Bear Gulch Reservoir PMF
California Water Service
Company
San Jose General Plan
Update, Water Supply
Summary
David J. Powers & Assoc.

Kahakuloa Acres Private
Water System Evaluation and
Two Storage Tanks
Maui, Hawaii
Upper Miocene Canal,
Paradise
Cotton Shires and Associates
Vista Pump Station and
Water Tank Improvement
Town of Hillsborough/CSG
Consultants
Kern River Raw Water
Pumping Plant Forensic
Investigation
Noriega and Bradshaw, LLP
Konocti Harbor Water
Treatment, Storage, and
Distribution Evaluation
Page Mill Properties
Water System Network
Modeling, Flow Testing, &
Fire Flow Calculations
City of San Jose
Potable wells, storage tanks,
and water mains for Coyote
Valley Specific Plan
City of San Jose
Waimanalo Reservoir
Assessment, Martin v. State
of Hawaii
State of Hawaii
Well Nos. C-20, C-21, C-22,
and C-23
City of San Jose
Carmel Development
Company Water System
Mediation, Monterey
Harry & Linker, LLP
Potable and Irrigation Water
Supply, Storage &
Distribution Systems
Coyote Creek Golf Club
Education
BCE, Georgia Institute of
Technology
MSCE (Water Resource
Engineering), Stanford
University
Licenses
Registered Civil Engineer,
California C43776
Hawaii 15647
Nevada 11518
Washington 39715
Affiliations
American Council of
Engineering Consultants
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Floodplain Management
Association
Charles D. Anderson,
PE President
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Recycled Water Systems
Retrofit Design for Paper Mill
California Container
Corporation, Santa Clara
Recycled Retrofits and
Waterline Extensions
City of Santa Clara
Lake Merced Country Club
Storage Tank and Pump
Station
DBS Structures, Inc.

Customer Retrofit Plans for
Recycled Water Use
South Bay Water Recycling
Program
The Villages Golf Course
Irrigation Pump Station
City of San Jose
Floodplain Management and
Infrastructure
West Channel Enhancement
Google, Inc.

San Francisquito-Adobe
Creek Flood Study
Wood Rogers/Valley Water
Miller Creek Floodplain
Forensics and Testimony
Marin County/SMART
San Felipe Road Floodplain
Giacalone Management, Inc.

Foster City Levee
Improvments
City of Foster City
Annual Levee Inspection
City of San Mateo
Millbrae and Burlingame
Shoreline Area Protection
and Enhancement Project
San Mateo County Flood and
Sea Level Rise Resiliency
District (OneShoreline)
Downtown West Los Gatos
Creek Restoration
Google, Inc.

Berryessa/Penitencia
Watershed Flood Study
Wood Rogers/Valley Water
Palo Alto Flood Basin Sea
Level Rise Impact Study
Valley Water
Lower Penitencia Creek
Improvements
Wood Rogers/Valley Water
Colma Creek Floodplain
Analaysis
City of South San Francisco
Guadalupe River Bridge
Hydraulics at Railyard Place
Biggs Cardosa Associates
Upper Llagas Creek Flood
Protection Project
Woodard & Curran/Valley
Water
Permanente Creek Flood
Protection Project
Mott MacDonald/Valley
Water
Storm Water Detention
Basins at Truckee River
Reno-Sparks Indian Colony
San Francisquito Creek
Hydrology Study Peer
Review
Valley Water
Christopher Ranch Flood
Study (Uvas Creek)
Christopher Ranch
Bayfront Canal Redwood City
Flooding Issues
Stanford Real Estate
Old Mountain View Alviso
Road Bridge Replacment
Hydraulic Study
Biggs Cardosa Associates
Highway 101
Pedestrian/Bicycle
Overcrossing at Adobe Creek
Biggs Cardosa Associates
Wrigley-Ford Creek Long
Term Monitoring
HT Harvey & Associates
North Gilroy Neighborhood
District Urban Services Area
Amendment
EMC Planning Group
Silicon Valley BART
Extension Floodplain
Analysis
Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority
Bayfront Levee Improvement
Project
City of San Mateo
San Tomas Aquino Creek
Flood Study
Valley Water
Recertification of Uvas,
Stevens and Lower
Penitencia Creek Levees
Valley Water
Truckee River Levee and
Floodwall System
CFA Engineers
O’Neill Slough Tide Gate
Structure
City of San Mateo
Julian Street and William
Street Bridge Retrofits at
Coyote Creek
Biggs Cardosa Associates
South Sutter County Flood
Control Alternatives
Sacramento Area Flood
Control Agency
SW Lemmon Valley Flood
Control Master Plan/Channel
Improvements
CFA, Inc.

Wooster Avenue Bridge
Replacement
Advanced Engineering
Design
Lower Cache Creek Flood
Control Barrier and
Woodland Measure S
Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger
Sunnyvale West Channel
Google, Inc.

Other Notable
Stochastic Analysis of Interim
Dam Reliability, Anderson
Dam Seismic Retrofit
Valley Water
TJC and Associates, Inc. Paul J. Giorsetto, P.E., LEED AP Paul J. Giorsetto, P.E., LEED AP – Vice President
Paul Giorsetto, a licensed engineer since 1984, has extensive design experience in the areas of electrical power distribution, electrical industrial applications, control systems, and instrumentation.

His specific experience includes electrical system modeling and planning; medium and low-voltage electrical distribution designs of water, wastewater and industrial waste treatment facilities; plant instrumentation; and SCADA systems for in-plant and telemetry-based systems.  Reservoir A1/A2, Booster Pump Station B/C Project; Marina Coast Water District, Marina, CA; ICE Project Manager. Project included improvements to District infrastructure to address several operational issues in its multi-zone potable water distribution system.

Improvements included two new Zone A reservoirs to increase storage, improve zone pressure control, and facilitate time-of-day operation; new Zone B and Zone C booster stations at the reservoirs site to improve operations; and off-site improvements to the existing Ord Well Field chlorination system including new hypochlorite dosing systems and new standby generator.  Graham Hill WTP Electrical Improvements Project; City of Santa Cruz Water Department, Santa Cruz, CA; Project Engineer and TJCAA Project Manager. Renovation, expansion, and improvements to the electrical distribution system at the City’s main Graham Hill WTP. This project included verification and design validation to establish the conceptual approach. Final design for upgrades to the electrical system included a new utility 21 kV primary service, 480 V main-tie-main switchgear with source transfer logic, remote switchgear console for arc-flash considerations, 1,500 kW engine-generator set, and a dedicated electrical building.  Pacheco Pumping Plant ASD Replacement Project; Valley Water, Santa Clara, CA; Lead Instrumentation Engineer, Project QA/QC, and TJCAA Project Manager. This project included replacement of 12 existing, 2,000 hp, 5 kV, wound-rotor motor speed controls with new PWM ASDs. Work included analysis of drive technologies, review of prequalification and procurement delivery methods, control system interfaces to large drives, and modifications to the existing controls to support interim operation of parallel control systems during construction.  Bradford Storm Drain Pump Station Design; City of Redwood City, Redwood City, CA; Engineer of Record. Electrical and I&C for pump station renovation and upgrades. Design includes replacement of existing pumps with new 150 HP to 600 HP motors with VFD control.

Design challenges include renovation with larger rated equipment, standby generator, and new PG&E service on very constrained site and with numerous nearby sensitive receptors.  Ross Booster Station Upgrades; Water Division, Pasadena Water and Power, Pasadena, CA; Project Engineer. Development and evaluation of alternatives for providing emergency power to a booster pump station constructed in 1958. Evaluation addressed cost, siting, maintenance, power, air quality, noise, and performance. Provided planning-level cost estimates and recommendations.
 Potable Water Pump Station Standby Generators/Emergency Response Project; Dublin San Ramon Services District, Pleasanton, Dublin, and San Ramon, CA; Project Manager. Site electrical analysis and condition assessments for installation of standby power equipment at 17 sites across the DSRSD service area, with the objective of providing extended standby power capability to meet water supply reliability requirements during the PG&E Public Safety Power Shutdown program. Developed standby operation strategies, generator sizing criteria, and coordinated direct procurement of generators.  Simmons Slough Drainage Improvement, Stormwater Pump Stations; Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Novato, CA; Project Manager and Engineer of Record. I&C and electrical design services for renovations to an existing stormwater pump station on San Francisco Bay. Final design included PG&E utility coordination including overhead line extension, new utility metering enclosure, outdoor-rated MCC, independent normal and backup pump controls, and provision for a portable standby generator.  West Ranch Recycled Water Main Extension (Phase 2D); Castaic Lake Water Agency, Santa Clarita, CA; Engineer of Record. Design of instrumentation, controls, and electrical systems for a new recycled water pump station. Work included predesign and design including load calculations, coordination of a new 480 V SCE service, new facility 480 V distribution, VFDdriven recycled water pumps, motor controls, and remote telemetry.  Arc Flash Hazard Assessment; Monterey One Water, Marina, CA; Project Manager.

TJCAA provided an arc flash hazard analysis for remote lift and pump stations. The study analyzed 51 sites, determined the risk of an arc flash at each facility, and developed recommendations for improvements to reduce or eliminate the identified risks. Using SKM PowerTools©, TJCAA prepared models for each site, analyzing existing equipment ratings, protection, device coordination, and arc flash levels. TJCAA made recommendations for equipment upgrades and settings to improve coordination and/or reduce arc flash energy and established documentation.

Education
MBA, UC Berkeley;
1988
MS, Electrical
Engineering and
Computer Science;
UC Berkeley; 1980
BS, Electrical
Engineering and
Computer Science;
UC Berkeley; 1978
Professional
Registrations
Electrical:

CA 11674, AK, AZ,

CO, HI, ID, NM,

NV, OR, UT, WA,
WI
Control Systems:

CA 7106
LEED Accredited
Professional
Professional
Affiliations
• Institute of
Electrical and
Electronics
Engineers
• Instrumentation,
Systems, and
Automation
Society
Office Address
1111 Broadway
Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94607
Ms. Farr is a project engineer with five years of environmental consulting experience working in California, primarily in the San Francisco Bay Area.

She provides project management and technical support services for a wide range of complex projects, including landfill redevelopments. Ms. Farr manages and conducts field investigations to collect soil, soil gas, groundwater, and indoor air data to evaluate the need for engineering systems, prepares environmental reports (including Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments, Monitoring Reports, and Site Mitigation Plans) and engineer's estimates, designs and monitors vapor intrusion mitigation systems, and provides quality assurance oversight during construction to confirm adherence with plans and specs.

SELECTED PROJECTS
 Oyster Point Phase I and II Landfill Redevelopment – Final Closure Plan and Postclosure Development Plan preparation, regulatory agency coordination, and construction oversight, South San Francisco, CA
 UCSF Laurel Heights Campus Redevelopment, 3333 California Street – Site Mitigation and Dust Monitoring Plan preparation, San Francisco, CA
 Genentech Building 40, 44, and 48 – Vapor mitigation system design, oversight, and reporting, South San Francisco, CA
 2000 Bryant Street – Dust monitoring, Site Mitigation Plan implementation, Vapor mitigation system oversight, San Francisco, CA  Mission Bay Block 6 West – Methane mitigation system design, oversight, and reporting, San Francisco, CA
 Meals on Wheels, 2230 Jerrold Street – Vapor mitigation system design, oversight, and reporting, South San Francisco, CA  San Francisco Marin Food Bank, 2550 Kerner Blvd – Methane mitigation system repair design and oversight, San Rafael, CA  California Pacific Medical Center Mission Bernal Campus, 3555 Cesar Chavez St – Site Mitigation Plan preparation and implementation, San Francisco, CA
 Midway Village Phase I Redevelopment – Vapor mitigation system design, Daly City, CA
 Nouveau Cleaners, 11 West 37th Ave – Site history review and vapor intrusion assessment, Environmental investigation preparation, San Mateo, CA
 One Piedmont, 230-240 W McArthur – Vapor Mitigation System peer review, Oakland, CA
 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments – Various sites in California

HAYLEY FARR, EIT

PROJECT ENGINEER

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

EDUCATION
B.Sc., Environmental
Engineering
California Polytechnic
State University
San Luis Obispo

REGISTRATION
Engineer in Training (EIT)

CERTIFICATIONS
40-Hour Hazardous Waste
Operations and
Emergency Response
(HAZWOPER)
Envision Sustainability
Professional (ENV SP)
LEED Green Associate
First Aid/CPR/AED

AFFILIATIONS
Engineers Without Borders
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Corporate Social
Responsibility
Representative
Mr. Ray has provided geotechnical engineering services for numerous projects throughout Northern California, including commercial and residential developments for mid- and high-rise buildings, and education and medical facilities. As a Senior Project Manager, his experience includes project management, engineering analysis, construction observation, and subsurface investigation for projects involving ground improvement, driven and drilled pile foundations, drilled pier foundations, shallow foundations, earthwork, and deep excavations. Mr. Ray has performed engineering analyses to determine settlement behavior of soil under new loading and earthquake loading, seismic hazards including liquefaction potential and lateral spreading, slope stability, bearing capacity of foundations, lateral and vertical capacity of deep foundations, and behavior of deep excavations and earth retention systems. In addition Mr.

Ray manages Langan’s soil laboratory which is accredited by AMRL, and the California Division of the State Architect (DSA, LEA No. 287).

SELECTED PROJECTS
 Oyster Point Landfill Redevelopment, South San Francisco, CA  Oyster Point Phase 1 Vertical Construction, South San Francisco, CA  Oyster Point Phase 2 Vertical Construction, South San Francisco, CA  Oceanwide Center, San Francisco, CA
 California Northstate University – Hospital, Sacramento, CA  Alameda Landing Waterfront, Alameda, CA
 1150 Clay Street, Oakland, CA
 40 Harrison, Street, Jack London Square, Oakland, CA
 855 Brannan Street Apartments, San Francisco, CA
 Ventura County Med Center Hospital Replacement Wing, Ventura, CA  Equity Potrero, San Francisco, CA
 Redwood City Jefferson Apartments, Redwood City, CA
 San Jose Earthquakes Stadium, San Jose, CA
 1110 Jackson Street, Oakland, CA
 Lakehouse Commons, Oakland, CA
 2 Kaiser Plaza, Oakland, CA
 San Francisco State - Creative Arts Building, San Francisco, CA  San Francisco Unified School District
o Lowell High School
o Paul Revere Elementary School
o Longfellow Elementary School
o McAteer Campus Modernization
o Thurgood Marshall High School
 1266 9th Avenue, Apartments, San Francisco, CA
 AVA Apartments, 55 9th Street, San Francisco, CA
 Rosewood-Madison Slope Repair, San Bruno, CA
 VA Palo Alto Polytrauma/Rehabilitation Center, Palo Alto, CA

JUSTIN RAY, PE, GE

SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

EDUCATION
M.S., Geotechnical
Engineering
University of California,
Berkeley
B.S., Civil & Environmental
Engineering
University of California,
Los Angeles

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer (PE)
in CA
Geotechnical Engineer (GE)
in CA

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil
Engineers
2009-present
Deep Foundations Institute
2011 – Present
San Francisco GeoInstitute,
Member 2012 – Present
Treasurer 2017 – 2019
Urban Land Institute. Young
Leaders Group,
Member 2020 - Present
Forums Chair – 2021
Mr. Ludlow has 37 years of experience in marketing, designing, and managing multidisciplinary environmental projects for private and public clients. Mr. Ludlow directs technical staff and subcontractors and provides project strategy, scheduling, budgetary control, and client and regulatory interfacing for projects ranging in size from $1,000 to over $4 million. His wide range of environmental experience includes assessing and remediating point source and nonpoint-source releases of organic and inorganic chemicals from tanks, sumps, waste ponds, wastewater streams, mine tailings and audits, and landfills. Mr. Ludlow developed Langan’s vapor intrusion mitigation practice and has designed vapor control and landfill gas mitigation systems for dozens of commercial and residential development projects in Northern and Southern California. These projects typically involve construction of new buildings over groundwater contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and petroleum hydrocarbons or are on former landfills with methane gas mitigation issues.

In most projects, Langan also provided geotechnical engineering services and design input to the building foundation system. This integrated approach has allowed Mr. Ludlow to design vapor mitigation solutions that are cost effective, constructible and integral to other building systems that minimize disruption of the normal building activities.

SELECTED PROJECTS
Landfill Projects
 Related Santa Clara Landfill Post-Closure Mixed Use Development Santa Clara, CA
 Oyster Point Landfill Post-Closure Development and Methane Mitigation, South San Francisco, CA
 Port of San Francisco Pier 94 Landfill Closure, San Francisco, CA  Sierra Point Business Center Multiple Projects Landfill Post-Closure Development, Brisbane and South San Francisco, CA
 Bascom Creekside mixed-use Redevelopment of Former Landfill, Methane Mitigation System Design, Campbell, CA
 America Center Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Development, San Jose, CA
 Westport Office Park Landfill Post-Closure Development Operation and Maintenance Program, Redwood City, CA
Office Campuses
 Maude & Mathilda Research & Development (R&D) (LinkedIn and Apple) Campus Vapor Mitigation Sunnyvale, CA
 Oyster Point Life Sciences Campus, South San Francisco, CA  Sierra Point Business Center, Methane Mitigation Landfill, Brisbane, CA  Symantec Corporation Chengdu, China
 LinkedIn Campus Vapor Mitigation Design, Sunnyvale, CA  Sandler Neurosciences Center at UCSF Mission Bay, Methane Mitigation Design, San Francisco, CA
 Jessie Square Garage, Jewish Museum, San Francisco, CA JEFFREY F. LUDLOW, PG

PRINCIPAL

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

EDUCATION
B.A., Geology
Southern Oregon State
College, Ashland

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATION
Professional Geologist in
CA and NY

AFFILIATIONS
California Groundwater
Association
JEFFREY F. LUDLOW, PG
 Sierra Point Business Center, Methane Mitigation Landfill, Brisbane, CA  America Center Mass Grading and Landfill Closure, San Jose, CA Higher Education
 J. David Gladstone Institutes Blocks 41-43, Parcel 2, Mission Bay,  Sandler Neurosciences Center at UCSF Mission Bay, Methane Mitigation Design, San Francisco, CA
 UCSF Parnassus Research and Administration Building, San Francisco, CA
Public Agency Contracts
 Alcatraz Island Hazardous Materials Preliminary Assessment, San Francisco, CA
 Grand Canyon National Park, Site and Health Risk Assessment, Grand Canyon National Park, AZ
 Port of Oakland New Harbor Facilities Center, Oakland, CA  San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco, CA  Siskiyou County Emergency Response Soil Remediation Monitoring, Siskiyou County,
 Yosemite National Park Remediation and Stormwater System Assessment, Yosemite, CA
 City of Hercules Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessments, Hercules, CA
Industrial/Warehouse
 MUNI Maintenance Facility Soil and Groundwater Remediation, San Francisco, CA
 MUNI Substation Redevelopment, 1140 Fillmore Street, San Francisco, CA
 Ryerson-Tull Steel Facility, Emeryville, CA
 Sacramento Army Depot RI/FS, federal Superfund site, Sacramento, CA Military Bases
 Fort Ord/Sierra Army Depot Closure Plan Reports, Northern CA  Hunters Point CERCLA Remedial Investigation, San Francisco, CA  Sacramento Army Depot RI/FS, federal Superfund site, Sacramento, CA  SFRA Hunters Point Shipyard, San Francisco, CA
Large-Scale Urban Development
 City Place Santa Clara landfill post-closure development Santa Clara, CA  Hunters Point CERCLA Remedial Investigation, San Francisco, CA Retail/Commercial Projects
 Santa Paula Dry Cleaners, Ventura, CA
 Century Center Shopping Center, Modesto, CA
 Hayward Cleaners, Creekside Center, Hayward, CA
Hospitals
 Sutter Health Van Ness Campus, San Francisco, CA
 Sutter Health Mission Bernal Campus, San Francisco, CA  Kaiser Medical Center, Mission Bay Blocks 41-43, Parcel 4, Methane Mitigation, San Francisco, CA
Mr. Gouchon provides geotechnical engineering services for numerous projects, including mid- and high-rise buildings, commercial and residential structures, parking structures, bridges, landfills, reservoirs, levees, and embankments. He is responsible for construction observation, engineering analysis, and technical management for projects involving driven and drilled pile foundations, drilled pier foundations, mat foundations, earthwork, and deep excavations. In addition, he provides recommendations for pavement design, estimates settlements, evaluates liquefaction potential and slope stability, performs seismic hazard studies, and develops seismic response spectra and time histories for structural analyses. Mr. Gouchon has extensive experience performing ground motion studies for hospitals and school projects requiring approval by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) and the California Geologic Survey (CGS).

SELECTED PROJECTS
Office Campuses
 Cityview, San Jose, California
 200 Park Ave., San Jose, California
 Platform 16, San Jose, California
 160 Harrison Street High-Technology Facility, Seismic Strengthening, San Francisco, CA
 303 Almaden Office Tower, San Jose, CA
 350 Mission Street, Future Salesforce Headquarters, San Francisco, CA  Apple Campus, San Jose, CA
 Britannia Cove at Oyster Point, Biotechnology Business Complex, South San Francisco, CA
 Broadcom Office and Parking Structures, San Jose, CA
 Burlingame Point, Office/Life Science Campus, Burlingame, CA  China Basin Office Building, San Francisco, CA
 Electronic Arts, Redwood City
 Equinix Facility Expansion, San Jose, CA
 Fremont Tech Center, Fremont, CA
 Google Charleston East Campus and Transit Center, Mountain View, CA  Google Technology Facility at NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA
 Bayview Campus at NASA Ames and Off-Site Improvements, Mountain View, CA
 HGST Campus, San Jose, CA
 Intuit Campus, Mountain View, CA
 NVIDIA Campus, Santa Clara, CA
 Oracle Campus (Headquarters) Redwood City, CA
 Oracle Island Parkway Campus, Belmont, CA
 Oracle, Santa Clara, CA
 Oyster Point Landfill Redevelopment, South San Francisco, CA  Britannia Cove at Oyster Point, Biotechnology Business Complex, South San Francisco, CA

JOHN GOUCHON, PE, GE

PRINCIPAL

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

EDUCATION
M.S., Geotechnical
Engineering University of
California, Berkeley
B.S., Civil Engineering
University of California,
Berkeley

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer (PE)
in CA, NY
Geotechnical Engineer
(GE) in CA

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of
Engineers (ASCE) 1985 -
present
EERI 2002 - present

JOHN GOUCHON, PE, GE
 Pacific Stock Exchange, San Francisco, CA
 Pixar Animation Studios, Emeryville, CA
 Samsung Headquarters, San Jose, CA
 Samsung R&D Campus (625 Clyde Avenue), Mountain View, CA  Shoreline Technology Park, Mountain View, CA
 Sierra Point Business Center, Landfill Redevelopment, Brisbane and South San Francisco, CA
 Sun Microsystems, Menlo Park, CA
 Wells Fargo Center, Sacramento, CA
 LAM Research Campus, Milpitas, CA
 Meridian Plaza, Sacramento, CA
 160 Harrison Street, High-Tech Facility, San Francisco, CA  1500/1580 Mission Street, Office/Residential, San Francisco, CA  1015 Martin Avenue, Data Center, Santa Clara, CA
 3801/3803 East Bayshore Road, Office, Mountain View, California  384 Santa Trinita, Office, Sunnyvale, CA
 399 West Java Drive, Office, Sunnyvale, CA
 525 Berry Street, Office, San Francisco, CA
 1350 Shorebird Blvd., Campus Amenities Addition, Mountain View, CA  China Basin Landing, Office, San Francisco, CA
 Concar Property, Office, San Mateo, CA
 Portofino, Office, Redwood City, CA
Mixed-Use
 City Place Santa Clara Landfill Redevelopment, CA
 The Hills at Vallco, Cupertino, CA
 1750-1770 Fulton Street, Mixed-Use Development, San Francisco, CA  Bay Meadows Racetrack Redevelopment,
 Oceanwide Center, 1st and Mission streets, Tower 1 for Office Space and Tower 2 for Hotel and Condominiums, San Francisco, CA  Santa Clara Square, Residential/Office/Retail, Santa Clara, CA  Transbay Block 9, Residential/Retail, San Francisco, CA  Transbay Blocks 6/7, Residential /Retail, San Francisco, CA  Nazareth Plaza, San Mateo, CA
 Mission Town Center, Santa Clara, CA
 Aviato – 199 Bassett Street, Mixed-Use Tower, San Jose, CA  Fountain Alley, San Jose, CA
 CityView, San Jose, CA
 Park Habitat, San Jose, CA
 200 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA
Data Centers
 Equinix SV10, SV11 and SV12, San Jose, CA
 Equinix SV5ibx Data Center, San Jose, CA
 Equinix Great Oaks & Santa Teresa Blvd., San Jose, CA  Terremark Data Center – 2970 Corvin Drive, Santa Clara  1231 Comstock, Santa Clara, CA
 2225, 2255,and 2285 Martin Avenue, San Clara, CA
 2175 Martin Avenue, Santa Clara CA
 1111 Comstock Street, Santa Clara, CA
 TGS Irvine Data, Irvine, CA
Anthony Notaro, PE
Associate, Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc.

Anthony Notaro joined Biggs Cardosa in 1991, after serving with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He has nearly 30 years of experience in structural engineering with an emphasis on transportation and infrastructure projects.

He has been a Project Manager on numerous projects including new construction, rehabilitation and/or seismic retrofit of various pedestrian, vehicular, and rail bridge structures, retaining wall and soundwall structures, and various hydraulic structures including tanks, pump stations, trash capture devises, junction boxes, floodwalls, drainage channels and creek trail facilities.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Storm Water Collection and Flood Control
San Jose Trash Capture Device Installation Project, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for the design and construction of below ground reinforced concrete trash capture facility for the collection and removal of trash from storm water.

The Project received a 2019 APWA Silicon Valley Chapter Honor Award and a Commendation Award at the 2019 ACEC Engineering Excellence Awards.

Citywide Trash Capture Project Phase 1, Mountain View, CA: Project Manager for existing storm drainage system modifications to accommodate a new trash capture device. Project received a 2019 APWA Silicon Valley Chapter Honor Award
Baylands Pump Station No. 2 Rehabilitation, Sunnyvale, CA: Project Manager for structural assessment and rehabilitation of storm water pump station facilities including a masonry mechanical/electrical building, multiple shaft below grade wet well, inlet and outlet structures and site retaining walls.

Project received a 2019 APWA Silicon Valley Chapter Honor Award.

San Francisquito Storm Water Pump Station, Palo Alto, CA: Project Manager for a new 300 cfs capacity storm water pump station facility including pump house, wet well, creek outfall and storm diversion/bypass structures.

Chrysler Storm Water Pump Station Improvements, Menlo Park, CA: Project Manager for design of a new reinforced concrete underground wet well structure. The project also includes the design of a reinforced concrete Pump/Motor building supported by the wet well structure and a reinforced concrete Electrical building located adjacent to the wet well.

Marsten Pump Station Upgrade, Burlingame, CA: Engineering Manager for replacement of existing pump station facilities including Marsten wet well and discharge box, Easton Creek wet well and discharge box, maintenance bridge, underground junction structure, electrical building, site retaining walls and generator slab.

Coyote Point and Poplar Avenue Pump Stations, San Mateo, CA: Project Manager for rehabilitation and reconfiguration of two storm water pump station facilities at Coyote Point.

Hillsdale Boulevard Overcrossing Pumping Plant, San Mateo, CA: Engineering Manager for modification of the existing underground pump station facility and construction of site retaining walls to accommodate widening of the adjacent roadway.

Nelo Victor Pump Station, Santa Clara, CA: Engineering Manager for replacement of the existing substandard wet well and modification to the existing masonry and timber pump station building.

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer
(Civil), CA C51739

EDUCATION
B.S. Architectural
Engineering, California
Polytechnic State
University, San Luis
Obispo, CA
Engineer Officers Basic
Course, United States
Army Corps of Engineers
Years with BCA: 26
Total Years of Experience:
29 VEHICLE S&W LANGAN TJCAA BCA AGS REIM- TOTAL TOTAL

MATERIALS SUB- SUB- SUB- SUB- SUB- BURSABLE TOTAL WH LABOR Task TASK DESCRIPTION $297 HRS $267 HRS $213 HRS $198 HRS $187 HRS $307 HRS OTHER $ CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS EXPENSES LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS

1. Project Management
1 Kick-off Meeting and site visit 0 1,602 6 1,278 6 0 0 0 5,060 0 6,872 0 2,880 14,812 12 2 Project Coordination 0 5,340 20 0 0 0 0 5,589 0 11,923 0 5,340 22,852 20 3 Quality Control Reviews and Revisions 1,188 4 4,272 16 2,556 12 0 3,740 20 0 8,487 0 12,931 0 11,756 33,174 52 4 Develop & Monitoring Schedule, Monitor Budget 0 6,408 24 0 0 0 0 2,530 0 4,802 0 6,408 13,740 24 5 Sub-consultant Coord 0 4,272 16 0 0 0 0 0 17,699 0 0 4,272 21,971 16 6 Coord with City of SSF 0 5,340 20 1,704 8 0 0 0 6,854 0 4,802 0 7,044 18,700 28 7 Identify & conduct outreach to stakeholders 0 3,204 12 852 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,056 4,056 16 8 Project Management for Sub-Consultants 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,530 0 0 0 0 2,530 0 9 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 759 0 50 0 809 0
1,188 4 30,438 114 6,390 30 0 0 3,740 20 0 0 0 31,050 17,699 42,090 0 0 50 41,756 132,645 168

2. Record Search and Site Investigation
1 Obtain Record Utility Information 0 267 1 1,278 6 0 748 4 0 3,059 0 0 0 2,293 5,352 11 2 Utility locating 0 534 2 426 2 792 4 1,496 8 7,368 24 0 0 0 0 6,900 10,616 17,516 40 3 Perform topographic field survey 0 267 1 426 2 792 4 1,122 6 4,912 16 0 0 0 0 7,519 7,519 29 4 Set up project base map 0 267 1 852 4 0 1,122 6 0 0 0 0 0 2,241 2,241 11 5 Perform site visit to review ex conditions, revise base maps 0 0 1,278 6 0 0 0 4,577 0 3,781 0 1,278 9,636 6 6 Review record data 0 267 1 852 4 0 0 0 4,888 3,565 6,362 0 1,119 15,933 5 7 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 828 0 945 1,058 740 0 3,571 0 0 0 1,602 6 5,112 24 1,584 8 4,488 24 12,280 40 0 13,352 3,565 11,088 1,058 6,900 740 25,066 61,769 102

3. Conceptual Design and Basis of Design
1 Prepare conceptual Pump Station Plans 0 534 2 1,704 8 0 1,496 8 0 16,008 11,621 0 0 3,734 31,363 18 2 Prepare conceptual Electrical Switchgear Relocation Plans 0 267 1 852 4 0 0 0 1,794 0 10,396 0 1,119 13,309 5 3 Prepare conceptual force main and sump pump plans 297 1 1,068 4 5,112 24 0 2,992 16 0 0 0 0 0 9,469 9,469 45 4 Prepare conceptual engineer's cost estimate 0 267 1 1,704 8 0 0 0 4,324 0 10,088 0 1,971 16,383 9 5 Prepare Basis of Design Memo 594 2 1,068 4 3,408 16 0 0 0 14,007 0 10,695 0 5,070 29,772 22 6 Meet with City to review BOD 0 534 2 426 2 0 0 0 1,081 0 3,781 0 960 5,822 4 7 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
891 3 3,738 14 13,206 62 0 0 4,488 24 0 0 0 37,214 11,621 34,960 0 0 0 22,323 106,118 103

4. Geotechnical and Environmental Services
1 Perform geotechnical Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Prepare geotechnical report 0 1,068 4 852 4 0 0 0 0 17,147 0 0 1,920 19,067 8 3 Prepare Postclosure Development Plan 0 534 2 1,704 8 0 1,496 8 0 0 19,780 0 0 3,734 23,514 18 4 Coordinate with regulatory agencies 0 1,068 4 0 0 0 0 0 8,366 0 0 1,068 9,434 4 5 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 2,670 10 2,556 12 0 0 1,496 8 0 0 0 0 45,293 0 0 0 0 6,722 52,015 30

TECH DESIGNER SURVEY CREW
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
2 PERSON
ENGINEER ENGR/SRVR 2
City of South San Francisco
Consulting Services for Oyster Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202 Design Schedule/Cost Estimate
11/29/2022

PRINCIPAL SUPERVISING ENGINEER SR SURVEY SENIOR

VEHICLE S&W LANGAN TJCAA BCA AGS REIM- TOTAL TOTAL

MATERIALS SUB- SUB- SUB- SUB- SUB- BURSABLE TOTAL WH LABOR Task TASK DESCRIPTION $297 HRS $267 HRS $213 HRS $198 HRS $187 HRS $307 HRS OTHER $ CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS EXPENSES LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS

TECH DESIGNER SURVEY CREW
2 PERSON
ENGINEER ENGR/SRVR 2

PRINCIPAL SUPERVISING ENGINEER SR SURVEY SENIOR
5 Contract Documents
1 Prepare 60% Pump Station Plans 0 534 2 2,556 12 0 2,244 12 0 27,658 7,337 0 0 5,334 40,329 26 2 Prepare 60% Elec. Switchgear Relocation Plans 0 534 2 1,704 8 0 1,496 8 0 3,059 0 56,088 0 3,734 62,881 18 3 Prepare 60% Force Main and Sump Pump Plans 594 2 2,136 8 12,780 60 0 7,480 40 0 13,731 0 0 0 22,990 36,721 110 4 Prepare technical specifications 594 2 1,602 6 4,260 20 0 0 0 16,353 0 30,484 0 6,456 53,293 28 5 Update engineers cost estimate 0 267 1 1,278 6 0 0 0 4,853 0 0 0 1,545 6,398 7 6 Submit 60% PS&E package to City 0 267 1 852 4 0 374 2 0 1,794 0 0 0 1,493 3,287 7 7 Meet with City to review 60% PS&E package 0 534 2 426 2 0 0 0 1,081 0 0 0 960 2,041 4 7 Address City Comments on Plans,develop to 90% 594 2 1,602 6 10,224 48 0 2,992 16 0 15,249 0 1,577 45,069 15,412 77,306 72 8 Address City Comments on estimate, develop to 90% 0 267 1 1,278 6 0 0 0 2,162 0 1,577 0 1,545 5,284 7 9 Address City comments on tech specs, develop to 90% 0 267 1 1,704 8 0 0 0 4,853 0 4,533 24,133 1,971 35,490 9 10 Prepare contract book 594 2 2,136 8 5,112 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,842 7,842 34 11 Submit 100% PS&E ro City for Bidding 0 267 1 852 4 0 374 2 0 1,081 0 1,201 0 1,493 3,775 7 12 Meet with City to review 90% PS&E package 0 534 2 426 2 0 0 0 6,136 0 3,602 0 960 10,698 4 13 Address City Comments on 90% PS&E, finalize 100% PS&E 297 1 1,068 4 5,112 24 0 2,244 12 0 3,059 0 2,401 19,205 8,721 33,386 41 14 Submit 100% PS&E ro City for Bidding 0 267 1 852 4 0 374 2 0 0 0 0 0 1,493 1,493 7 15 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2,673 9 12,282 46 49,416 232 0 0 17,578 94 0 0 0 101,069 7,337 101,462 88,406 0 0 81,949 380,223 381 6 Public Bidding/Construction Support Services
1 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 0 534 2 426 2 0 0 0 1,081 0 2,236 0 960 4,277 4 2 Respond to bidders questions 0 1,068 4 852 4 0 0 0 0 7,337 0 1,553 1,920 10,810 8 3 Issue up to two bid addenda 0 1,068 4 1,704 8 0 0 0 4,129 0 4,747 0 2,772 11,648 12 4 Reimbursables 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 0
0 0 2,670 10 2,982 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,210 7,337 6,983 1,553 0 25 5,652 26,759 24 4,752 16 53,400 200 79,662 374 1,584 8 31,790 170 12,280 40 0 187,894 92,851 196,583 91,017 6,900 815 183,468 759,528 808 Notes:

GRAND TOTAL

1. The amounts may vary between tasks and individuals but the Grand Total amount will not be exceeded without approval of the Client.

2. Total All$ includes subconsultants and reimbursable costs.

3. Hourly rates effective through December 31, 2023 and subject to revision annually thereafter.

4. All positions may not be shown. If a position is not shown the Charge Rate Fee Schedule will govern.

Subtotal
Subtotal

TOTAL TOTAL
Sub TOTAL WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION $275 HRS $195 HRS $165 HRS LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS

1. Project Management
1 Kick-off Meeting and Site Visit 2,200 8 2,200 8 0 0 4,400 4,400 16 2 Project Coordination 3,300 12 1,560 8 0 4,860 4,860 20 3 Qualiy Control Reviews and Revisions 6,600 24 780 4 0 7,380 7,380 28 4 Develop & Monitoring Schedule, Monitor Budget 2,200 8 0 0 0 2,200 2,200 8 5 Sub-consultant Coord 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Coord with City of SSF 4,400 16 1,560 8 0 5,960 5,960 24 7 Identify & conduct outreach to stakeholders 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Project Management for Sub-Consultants 2,200 8 0 0 2,200 2,200 8 9 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20,900 76 6,100 28 0 0 27,000 27,000 104

2. Record Search and Site Investigation
1 Obtain Record Utility Information 1,100 4 1,560 8 0 2,660 2,660 12 2 Utility locating 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Perform topographic field survey 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Set up project base map 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Perform site visit to review ex conditions, revise base maps 1,100 4 1,560 8 1,320 8 3,980 3,980 20 6 Review record data 1,100 4 1,170 6 1,980 12 4,250 4,250 22 7 Reimbursibles 0 390 2 330 2 720 720 4
3,300 12 4,680 24 3,630 22 11,610 11,610 58

3. Conceptual Design and Basis of Design
1 Prepare conceptual Pump Station Plans 3,300 12 4,680 24 5,940 36 13,920 13,920 72 2 Prepare conceptual Electrical Switchgear Relocation Plans 0 1,560 8 0 1,560 1,560 8 3 Prepare conceptual force main and sump pump plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Prepare conceptual engineer's cost estimate 2,200 8 1,560 8 0 3,760 3,760 16 5 Prepare Basis of Design Memo 3,300 12 6,240 32 2,640 16 12,180 12,180 60 6 Meet with City to review BOD 550 2 390 2 0 940 940 4
17 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
9,350 34 14,430 74 8,580 52 32,360 32,360 160

4. Geotechnical and Environmental Services
1 Perform geotechnical Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Prepare geotechnical report 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Prepare landfill closure plan 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Coordinate with regulatory agencies 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subconsultant Name: Schaaf & Wheeler PIC/PM Design Engineer CAD Technician City of South San Francisco
Consulting Services for Oyster Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202 Design Schedule/Cost Estimate
11/29/2022

FILL IN CORRECT POSITION TITLE AND CORRECT HOURLY RATE/POSITION

TOTAL TOTAL
Sub TOTAL WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION $275 HRS $195 HRS $165 HRS LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS Subconsultant Name: Schaaf & Wheeler PIC/PM Design Engineer CAD Technician 5 Contract Documents
1 Prepare 60% Pump Station Plans 4,400 16 9,750 50 9,900 60 24,050 24,050 126 2 Prepare 60% Elec. Switchgear Relocation Plans 1,100 4 1,560 8 0 2,660 2,660 12 3 Prepare 60% Force Main and Sump Pump Plans 3,300 12 4,680 24 3,960 24 11,940 11,940 60 4 Prepare technical specifications 3,300 12 10,920 56 0 14,220 14,220 68 5 Update engineers cost estimate 1,100 4 3,120 16 0 4,220 4,220 20 6 Submit 60% PS&E package to City 0 1,560 8 0 1,560 1,560 8 7 Meet with City to review 60% PS&E package 550 2 390 2 0 940 940 4 7 Address City Comments on Plans,develop to 90% 3,300 12 4,680 24 5,280 32 13,260 13,260 68 8 Address City Comments on estimate, develop to 90% 1,100 4 780 4 0 1,880 1,880 8 9 Address City comments on tech specs, develop to 90% 1,100 4 3,120 16 0 4,220 4,220 20 11 Prepare contract book 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Meet with City to review 90% PS&E package 550 2 390 2 0 940 940 4 13 Address City Comments on 90% PS&E, finalize 100% PS&E 2,200 8 3,120 16 16 5,336 5,336 24 14 Submit 100% PS&E to City for Bidding 1,100 4 1,560 8 0 2,660 2,660 12 17 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0
23,100 84 45,630 234 19,156 116 87,886 87,886 434
6 Public Bidding/Construction Support Services
1 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 550 2 390 2 940 940 4
2 Respond to bidders questions 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Issue up to two bid addenda 1,100 4 1,170 6 1,320 8 3,590 3,590 18 13 Reimbursables 0 0 0 0 0 0
1,650 6 1,560 8 1,320 8 4,530 4,530 22
58,300 212 72,400 368 32,686 198 163,386 163,386 778
Notes:

GRAND TOTAL

1. The amounts may vary between tasks and individuals but the Grand Total amount will not be exceeded without approval of the Client.

2. Total All$ includes subconsultants and reimbursable costs.

3. Hourly rates effective through December 31, 2023 and subject to revision annually thereafter.

4. All positions may not be shown. If a position is not shown the Charge Rate Fee Schedule will govern.

Subtotal
Subtotal

TOTAL TOTAL
Sub TOTAL WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION $310 HRS $245 HRS $215 HRS $150 HRS $155 HRS $115 HRS LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS

1. Project Management
1 Kick-off Meeting and Site Visit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Project Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Qualiy Control Reviews and Revisions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Develop & Monitoring Schedule, Monitor Budget 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Sub-consultant Coord 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Coord with City of SSF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Identify & conduct outreach to stakeholders 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Project Management for Sub-Consultants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2. Record Search and Site Investigation
1 Obtain Record Utility Information 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Utility locating 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Perform topographic field survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Set up project base map 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Perform site visit to review ex conditions, revise base maps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Review record data 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Reimbursibles 0 490 2 430 2 0 0 0 920 920 4
0 0 490 2 430 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 920 920 4

3. Conceptual Design and Basis of Design
1 Prepare conceptual Pump Station Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Prepare conceptual Electrical Switchgear Relocation Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Prepare conceptual force main and sump pump plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Prepare conceptual engineer's cost estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Prepare Basis of Design Memo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Meet with City to review BOD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. Geotechnical and Environmental Services
1 Perform geotechnical Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Prepare geotechnical report 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Prepare landfill closure plan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Coordinate with regulatory agencies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
City of South San Francisco
Consulting Services for Oyster Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202 Design Schedule/Cost Estimate
11/29/2022

FILL IN CORRECT POSITION TITLE AND CORRECT HOURLY RATE/POSITION Subconsultant Name: BCA Principal Associate Engineering Manager Assistant Engineer Drafter Admin Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal

TOTAL TOTAL
Sub TOTAL WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION $310 HRS $245 HRS $215 HRS $150 HRS $155 HRS $115 HRS LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS Subconsultant Name: BCA Principal Associate Engineering Manager Assistant Engineer Drafter Admin 5 Contract Documents
1 Prepare 60% Pump Station Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Prepare 60% Elec. Switchgear Relocation Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Prepare 60% Force Main and Sump Pump Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Prepare technical specifications 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Update engineers cost estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Submit 60% PS&E package to City 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Meet with City to review 60% PS&E package 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Address City Comments on Plans,develop to 90% 1,240 4 1,470 6 24,080 112 0 12,400 80 0 39,190 39,190 202 8 Address City Comments on estimate, develop to 90% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Address City comments on tech specs, develop to 90% 0 0 20,640 96 0 0 345 3 20,985 20,985 99 11 Prepare contract book 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Meet with City to review 90% PS&E package 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Address City Comments on 90% PS&E, finalize 100% PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Submit 100% PS&E to City for Bidding 0 1,470 6 13,760 64 0 1,240 8 230 2 16,700 16,700 80 15 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1,240 4 2,940 12 58,480 272 0 0 13,640 88 575 5 76,875 76,875 381 6 Public Bidding/Construction Support Services
1 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Respond to bidders questions 0 490 2 860 4 0 0 0 1,350 1,350 6 3 Issue up to two bid addenda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 490 2 860 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,350 1,350 6
1,240 4 3,920 16 59,770 278 0 0 13,640 88 575 5 79,145 79,145 391 Notes:

4. All positions may not be shown. If a position is not shown the Charge Rate Fee Schedule will govern.

Subtotal
Subtotal

GRAND TOTAL

1. The amounts may vary between tasks and individuals but the Grand Total amount will not be exceeded without approval of the Client.

2. Total All$ includes subconsultants and reimbursable costs.

3. Hourly rates effective through December 31, 2023 and subject to revision annually thereafter.

TOTAL TOTAL
Sub TOTAL WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION $230 HRS $255 HRS $315 HRS $340 HRS $380 HRS $145 HRS LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS

1. Project Management
1 Kick-off Meeting and site visit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Project Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Qualiy Control Reviews and Revisions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Develop & Monitoring Schedule, Monitor Budget 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Sub-consultant Coord 0 6,885 27 8,505 27 0 0 0 15,390 15,390 54 6 Coord with City of SSF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Identify & conduct outreach to stakeholders 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Project Management for Sub-Consultants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 6,885 27 8,505 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,390 15,390 54

2. Record Search and Site Investigation
1 Obtain Record Utility Information 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Utility locating 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Perform topographic field survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Set up project base map 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Perform site visit to review ex conditions, revise base maps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Review record data 1,840 8 0 1,260 4 0 0 0 3,100 3,100 12 1,840 8 0 0 1,260 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,100 3,100 12

3. Conceptual Design and Basis of Design
1 Prepare conceptual Pump Staiton Plans 0 3,825 15 3,780 12 1,360 4 1,140 3 0 10,105 10,105 34 2 Prepare conceptual Electrical Switchgear Relocation Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Prepare conceptual force main and sump pump plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Prepare conceptual engineer's cost estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Prepare Basis of Design Memo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Meet with City to review BOD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 3,825 15 3,780 12 1,360 4 1,140 3 0 0 10,105 10,105 34

4. Geotechnical and Environmental Services
1 Perform geotechnical Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Prepare geotechnical report 3,680 16 4,080 16 3,150 10 1,700 5 1,140 3 1,160 8 14,910 14,910 58 3 Prepare Postclosure Development Plan 9,200 40 0 6,300 20 1,700 5 0 0 17,200 17,200 65 4 Coordinate with regulatory agencies 3,450 15 3,825 15 0 0 0 0 7,275 7,275 30 16,330 71 7,905 31 9,450 30 3,400 10 1,140 3 1,160 8 39,385 39,385 153 Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
1 2 3 4 5 6
City of South San Francisco
Consulting Services for Oyster Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202 Design Schedule/Cost Estimate
11/29/2022

FILL IN CORRECT POSITION TITLE AND CORRECT HOURLY RATE/POSITION Subconsultant Name: Langan Senior Staff Project Staff Senior Project Staff Senior Assoc. Principal Graphics/WP

TOTAL TOTAL
Sub TOTAL WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION $230 HRS $255 HRS $315 HRS $340 HRS $380 HRS $145 HRS LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS Subconsultant Name: Langan 1 2 3 4 5 6
Senior Staff Project Staff Senior Project Staff Senior Assoc. Principal Graphics/WP 5 Contract Documents
1 Prepare 60% Pump Station Plans 0 2,550 10 3,150 10 680 2 0 0 6,380 6,380 22 2 Prepare 60% Elec. Switchgear Relocation Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Prepare 60% Force Main and Sump Pump Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Prepare technical specifications 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Update engineers cost estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Submit 60% PS&E package to City 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Meet with City to review 60% PS&E package 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Address City Comments on Plans,develop to 90% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Address City Comments on estimatie, develop to 90% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Address City comments on tech specs, develop to 90% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Prepare contract book 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Submit 100% PS&E ro City for Bidding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Meet with City to review 90% PS&E package 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Address City Comments on 90% PS&E, finalize 100% PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Submit 100% PS&E ro City for Bidding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 2,550 10 3,150 10 680 2 0 0 0 0 6,380 6,380 22
6 Public Bidding/Construction Support Services
1 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Respond to bidders questions 0 2,550 10 3,150 10 680 2 0 0 6,380 6,380 22 3 Issue up to two bid addenda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 2,550 10 3,150 10 680 2 0 0 0 0 6,380 6,380 22
18,170 79 23,715 93 29,295 93 6,120 18 2,280 6 1,160 8 80,740 80,740 297 Notes:

4. All positions may not be shown. If a position is not shown the Charge Rate Fee Schedule will govern.

Subtotal
Subtotal

GRAND TOTAL

1. The amounts may vary between tasks and individuals but the Grand Total amount will not be exceeded without approval of the Client.

2. Total All$ includes subconsultants and reimbursable costs.

3. Hourly rates effective through December 31, 2023 and subject to revision annually thereafter.

TOTAL TOTAL
Sub TOTAL WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION $249 HRS $261 HRS $150 HRS $158 HRS $132 HRS LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS

1. Project Management
1 Kick-off Meeting and Site Visit 1,992 8 1,992 8 1,992 8 0 0 5,976 5,976 24 2 Project Coordination 1,992 8 6,264 24 0 0 2,112 16 10,368 10,368 48 3 Qualiy Control Reviews and Revisions 4,980 20 6,264 24 0 0 0 11,244 11,244 44 4 Develop & Monitoring Schedule, Monitor Budget 0 4,176 16 0 0 0 4,176 4,176 16 5 Sub-consultant Coord 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Coord with City of SSF 0 4,176 16 0 0 0 4,176 4,176 16 7 Identify & conduct outreach to stakeholders 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Project Management for Sub-Consultants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Reimbursibles 249 1 261 1 150 1 0 0 660 660 3
9,213 37 23,133 89 2,142 9 0 0 2,112 16 36,600 36,600 151

2. Record Search and Site Investigation
1 Obtain Record Utility Information 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Utility locating 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Perform topographic field survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Set up project base map 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Perform site visit to review ex conditions, revise base maps 0 2,088 8 1,200 8 0 0 3,288 3,288 16 6 Review record data 0 3,132 12 2,400 16 0 0 5,532 5,532 28 7 Reimbursibles 0 522 2 300 2 0 0 822 822 4
0 0 5,742 22 3,900 26 0 0 0 0 9,642 9,642 48

3. Conceptual Design and Basis of Design
1 Prepare conceptual Pump Station Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Prepare conceptual Electrical Switchgear Relocation Plans 0 4,176 16 3,600 24 1,264 8 0 9,040 9,040 48 3 Prepare conceptual force main and sump pump plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Prepare conceptual engineer's cost estimate 996 4 4,176 16 3,600 24 0 0 8,772 8,772 44 5 Prepare Basis of Design Memo 996 4 4,176 16 3,600 24 0 528 4 9,300 9,300 48 6 Meet with City to review BOD 0 2,088 8 1,200 8 0 0 3,288 3,288 16 7 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1,992 8 14,616 56 12,000 80 1,264 8 528 4 30,400 30,400 156

4. Geotechnical and Environmental Services
1 Perform geotechnical Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Prepare geotechnical report 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Prepare Postclosure Development Plan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Coordinate with regulatory agencies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
City of South San Francisco
Consulting Services for Oyster Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Relocation, SS2202 Design Schedule/Cost Estimate
11/29/2022

FILL IN CORRECT POSITION TITLE AND CORRECT HOURLY RATE/POSITION Administration
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subconsultant Name: TJCAA Principal in Charge Project Manager Design Engineer CAD Technician Subtotal

TOTAL TOTAL
Sub TOTAL WH LABOR
Task TASK DESCRIPTION $249 HRS $261 HRS $150 HRS $158 HRS $132 HRS LABOR $ ALL $ HOURS Administration Subconsultant Name: TJCAA Principal in Charge Project Manager Design Engineer CAD Technician 5 Contract Documents
1 Prepare 60% Pump Station Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Prepare 60% Elec. Switchgear Relocation Plans 996 4 8,352 32 19,200 128 20,224 128 0 48,772 48,772 292 3 Prepare 60% Force Main and Sump Pump Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Prepare technical specifications 2,988 12 20,880 80 0 0 2,640 20 26,508 26,508 112 5 Update engineers cost estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Submit 60% PS&E package to City 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Meet with City to review 60% PS&E package 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Address City Comments on Plans,develop to 90% 249 1 522 2 600 4 0 0 1,371 1,371 7 8 Address City Comments on estimate, develop to 90% 249 1 522 2 600 4 0 0 1,371 1,371 7 9 Address City comments on tech specs, develop to 90% 498 2 1,044 4 2,400 16 0 0 3,942 3,942 22 11 Prepare contract book 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Meet with City to review 90% PS&E package 0 1,044 4 0 0 0 1,044 1,044 4 13 Address City Comments on 90% PS&E, finalize 100% PS&E 0 3,132 12 0 0 0 3,132 3,132 12 14 Submit 100% PS&E to City for Bidding 0 2,088 8 0 0 0 2,088 2,088 8 15 Reimbursibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4,980 20 37,584 144 22,800 152 20,224 128 2,640 20 88,228 88,228 464 6 Public Bidding/Construction Support Services
1 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 0 1,044 4 900 6 0 0 1,944 1,944 10 2 Respond to bidders questions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Issue up to two bid addenda 996 4 3,132 12 0 0 0 4,128 4,128 16 996 4 4,176 16 900 6 0 0 0 0 6,072 6,072 26
17,181 69 85,251 327 41,742 273 21,488 136 5,280 40 170,942 170,942 845 Notes:

Subtotal
Subtotal

GRAND TOTAL

1. The amounts may vary between tasks and individuals but the Grand Total amount will not be exceeded without approval of the Client.

2. Total All$ includes subconsultants and reimbursable costs.

3. Hourly rates effective through December 31, 2023 and subject to revision annually thereafter.

4. All positions may not be shown. If a position is not shown the Charge Rate Fee Schedule will govern.