ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK
February 2023
MASTER PLAN
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK
MASTER PLAN
Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture. Inc
prepared by
February 2023
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Mayor and City Council
Mark Nagales, Mayor
Buenafl or Nicolas, Vice Mayor
Mark Addiego, Council Member
James Coleman, Council Member
Eddie Flores, Council Member
Parks and Recreation
Commission
William Lock, Chair
Steven Firpo, Vice Chair
Ruth DeNardi, Secretary
Michael Aires (2019-2021)
Betty Battaglia
Kristy Camacho
Brittany Burgo (beginning 2/2022)
Robert Uy
Consultant Team
Brian Fletcher, President
Zach Katz, Job Captain
Nate Ritchie, Project Manager
Dania Castro, Project Designer
Alice Deng, Project Designer
City Staff
Philip Vitale, Cap. Projects Deputy Director
Greg Mediati, P & R Director
Sharon Ranals, Assistant City Manager
Jacob Gilchrist, Director of Capital Projects
Angela Duldulao, Recreation Manager
Brian Noce, Acting Supervisor
Devin Stenhouse, Recreation Supervisor
Veronica Ortiz, Rec. & Comm. Services Program Coordinator Laura Armanino, Rec. & Comm. Services Supervisor
Ercie Santos, Cultural Arts Specialist
Mike Mulkerrins, Rec. & Comm. Services Supervisor
Austin Navarro, Rec. & Comm. Services Coordinator
Kelli Jo Cullinan, Rec. & Comm. Services Rec. Supervisor Bill Stridbeck, Rec. & Comm. Services Coordinator
Marcus Nava, Aquatics Club Coach
Erin O’Brien, Rec. & Comm. Services Supervisor
Joshua Richardson, Parks Division Manager
Zachary Kust, Parks Maintenance Supervisor
Brandon Cutajar, Parks Maintenance Supervisor
Adena Friedman, Principal Planner
Nell Selander, Econ. & Comm. Development Director
Kari Jung, Administrative Assistant II
Catherine Misener, Administrative Assistant II
Kimberly Morrison, Assistant Supervisor
Brian Crume, Facilities Manager
1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND .......................................................................... 3 • Introduction
• Site Context
• History
• 2007 Master Plan Summary
• Current Master Plan Goals
2. SITE UNDERSTANDING ........................................................................................ 11 • Existing Conditions
• Site Reconnaissance and Analysis
• Opportunities & Constraints
3. OUTREACH PROCESS .......................................................................................... 15 • Overview
• Public Outreach
• Stakeholder and Committee Meetings
• Survey Data Collection
4. CONCEPT PLANS................................................................................................. 23 • Overview
• Design Alternatives
• Preferred Plan
• Lighting/Artificial Turf
• Signage Program
5. IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................... 35 • Cost Estimate
• Funding Sources
6. APPENDIX .......................................................................................................... 37 • Appendix A - Meeting Summaries
• Appendix B - Survey Results Summaries
• Appendix C - Design Alternatives
• Appendix D - Preferred Concept Plan
• Appendix E - Cost Estimates
• Appendix F - Park Materials Board
• Appendix G - Signage Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Orange Memorial park is one the City’s
largest and most widely used parks.
The City has been updating the master
plan about every 15 years and it was time
to re-evaluate the park and update the
previously developed version completed
in 2007. The purpose of updating the
master plan was to establish a vision for
future improvements and to serve as
a point of reference as opportunities
and funding become available.
An essential part to a successful master
plan is receiving input during development
to ensure the plan represents the needs
and preferences of project stakeholders
and end users. The Orange Memorial park
master plan is a product of feedback
received from the local community and
several stakeholder groups that were
engaged during a series of in-person
and online events and meetings.
The concept plan developed is a mix of
the community’s preferred amenities and
vision for the park based on the feedback
and input received throughout the process,
An estimate of probable construction costs
was developed to assist with allocating
funding for improvements. The preferred
plan was broken down into phases that
allows items to be built independently
of one another to the maximum extent
possible so that the project could be
constructed as monies became available.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1
Site Photo - Park entry sign at Tennis Drive and Orange Avenue 01 I N T R O D U C T I O N
& BACKGROUND
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 3
1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
Introduction
Orange Memorial park is one of the
city’s most treasured parks which
includes a multitude of amenities
and is home to many citywide events
and programs throughout the year.
The recent development and growth
within South San Francisco, combined with
recent upgrades (Stormwater Capture
and Field Project) and anticipated
projects (Aquatic Center), creates an
appropriate opportunity to update the
master plan. The intention of the updated
master plan is to establish a vision for future
improvements and to serve as a point
of reference for securing funding as it is
made available in the future.
Site Photo - Existing basketball courts and recreation building Orange
Memorial
Park
California Golf Club
Sign Hill Park
Cal Water
Property
Sellick
Park
South
San Francisco
High School
Ponderosa
School
Southwood
School
Avalon
Grammar
School
Buri Buri
School Serra
Vista
School
Alta
Loma
School
El Camino
High School
Sunshine
Gardens
School
Grand Ave
School
Civic
Center
Martin
School
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Junipero Serra Blvd.
Junipero Serra
Blvd.
Junipero Serra Fwy.
Hickey Blvd.
Westborough Blvd.
Westborough Blvd.
Bayshore Fwy. Bayshore Fwy.
I-280
I-101
I-101
Tennis Dr.
Memorial St.
Chestnut Ave.
Orange Ave.
Spruce Ave.
Maple Ave.
Linden Ave.
Airport Blvd.
Grand Ave.
Railroad Ave.
Myrtle Ave.
Grand Ave. Mission Rd.
Antoinette Ln
Spruce Ave.
N. Canal St.
S. Canal St.
S. Maple Ave.
S. Linden Ave.
Park Space
Public Buildings Project Area
Centennial Way
Trail No Scale
4 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
Site Context
Orange Memorial park is centrally located
in the City of South San Francisco between
Orange Avenue and Chestnut Avenue
just east of El Camino Real. It is situated
between residential neighborhoods to the
north, east, and south with a commercial
area to the west. Trails adjacent to the
park include Centennial Way along the
southern edge and Sister Cities Trail parrallel
to North Canal Street at the east entrance.
The existing park is approximately 31.5
acres, (not including adjacent streets)
including the undeveloped 3.5 acre Old
Mazzanti property. Although negotiations
for the purchase of the Cal Water property,
located adjacent to the Mazzanti Property,
have stopped, the City is open to resuming
negotiations in the future. The size of the
park combined with its central location
make it a popular destination widely used
for recreational and passive activities, Citywide programs, and public events alike.
The park is roughly divided into a north
side and a south side by the Colma Creek
drainage channel with two foot bridges
that connect each area. The north side
of the park contains the majority of the
undeveloped Old Mazzanti property.
Figure 1 - Location Map
0 40’ 80’ 160’
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
CHESTNUT AVE.
ANTOINETTE LN.
ORANGE MEMORIAL
PARK
OLD
MAZZANTI
PROPERTY
CAL WATER
PROPERTY
COMMUNITY
GARDENS
APARTMENTS
APARTMENTS
COLMA CREEK
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
SSF
HISTORICAL
SOCIETY
COMMERCIAL AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 5
1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
History
The City of South Francisco was
incorporated in 1908. Sixteen years after
incorporation, in 1924, the community
brought the need for a park and
playgrounds to the attention of the City.
In 1925 the City secured land for a park
when the South San Francisco Land and
Improvement Company deeded 20 acres
to the City. A few years later, in 1929,
the fi rst plan for Orange Memorial park
was drawn up and the park was later
constructed in unison with the Colma Creek
drainage channel in 1933/1934. The South
San Francisco Land and Improvement
Company deeded an additional 7.8 acres
to the city in 1934, another 2 acres in 1947,
and in 1969 the City obtained 0.5 acres
from the Southern Pacifi c Company to
form the 30.3 acres which is now comprised
of Orange Memorial park, Orange
Avenue, Memorial Drive, and Tennis Drive.
From its conception, the central location
and size of Orange Memorial park made
it a prime asset to the community for
social and recreational gatherings. The
fi rst building to be constructed on site
to accommodate these gatherings
was a log cabin, known as the Scout
cabin, and was built during the 1930’s.
The cabin was well utilized as a meeting
place for various groups and classes, but
was demolished in 2006 due to structural
instability and to allow for construction of a
new recreation building, basketball courts,
and outdoor park restroom. In the 1940’s
a concrete barbeque was built near the
cabin to strengthen the community and
neighborhood, although it too was torn
down and replaced in 1965 by a group
picnic shelter. A couple years later, in 1967,
the City Corp Yard was constructed in the
park, adjacent to the old Old Mazzanti
property, and was the fi rst permanent
home of the City’s Parks Department.
Figure 2 - Aerial of Orange Memorial park
6 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
In later years it was transitioned into
artist studios and program storage. The
existing tennis court complex was built
the following year, followed by the pool
building in 1970, and the relocation of the
Eternal Flame sculpture to the park from
City Hall in 1984. Over the years, the park
has been expanded and renovated. The
last building to be constructed on the site
was the recreation building in 2008 while
the Kaboom play area renovation was
fi nished in 2011. The playground is the latest
feature to be constructed and completed.
In 2015, community outreach and design
began for the Stormwater Capture Project
which will divert water from Colma Creek
and clean it before being utilized for
irrigation around the park. Completion
of the project is set for 2022 while the
completion of the Sports Field Improvement
Project on top of the Stormwater Capture
Project is set for completion in 2023.
Site Photo - Artist studios
Site Photo - Tennis courts
Site Photo - ‘Eternal Flame’ sculpture
Site Photo - Old Mazzanti property Site Photo - Recreation building Site Photo - Pool building
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 7
Recently there has been more interest
in naturalizing a significant portion of
the creek. Specifically the portion of
the creek in Orange Park has been well
supported by the community. Additionally,
planning is currently underway for a new
Aquatics Facility that would replace
the aging pool along Tennis Drive.
2007 Master Plan Summary
For the previous master plan the City
conducted an extensive public outreach
campaign including workshops, public
meetings, and steering committee
meetings in order to create a new
vision for the park. Once the planning
process was complete development
goals were established based on the
information gathered. The following is a
summary of the goals and programmatic
elements of the 2007 Master Plan:
• Unify and connect existing portions
of the park currently divided by the
Colma Creek drainage channel,
existing tree rows, and vehicular routes
• Design park so that it can be built in
phases
• Develop a central meeting location for
community events and ceremonies
• Develop strong pedestrian circulation
throughout site and between primary
features of park
• Include additional high quality youth
baseball fields
• Include additional high quality soccer
field
• Include field lighting in master plan
• Enhance and expand existing bocce
ball facilities
1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
Figure 3 - 2007 Master Plan, Final Concept
8 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
• Create a windbreak for protection from
prevailing winds
• Incorporate a library/performing arts
center into the design
• Allow for future expansion of the pool
building
• Provide security lighting and other
security features throughout park
• Add more seating and picnic areas
• Provide a concession/storage building
for soccer and baseball
• Make Colma Creek drainage channel
more aesthetically pleasing
• Design park to still accommodate a
variety of small and large gatherings
and community events
• Add parking in perimeter locations
to create more pedestrian friendly
conditions
• Design park for low maintenance and
good maintenance access
• Use materials that are vandal resistant
• Open up park to create better visibility
• Add an entrance to the park off
Chestnut Avenue / Mission Road
intersection and at Commercial
Avenue
• Repair or replace the existing sports
fields
• Plan for summer camps utilizing the
park
• Save as many of the healthy trees as
possible
• Remove declining pines and
eucalyptus and replace with less messy
trees
• Increase pedestrian safety along
Orange Avenue
• Design Orange Memorial park so
that is ties into adjacent existing and
proposed trails and parks
• Build a skate park so that skaters have
an appointed place to skate
• Add more sculpture and art throughout
the park
• Design more playgrounds into the park,
especially near picnic areas
• Design more open spaces that can
be used for both passive and active
recreation
• Minimize visual intrusion of residential
garages along Tennis Drive
• Enhance the park entrances
and community frontages with
placemaking and landmark features
• Provide accessible playgrounds
• Provide for security surveillance and
lighting throughout park
• Maintain visibility of basketball courts
from Orange Avenue
• Provide permanent soccer field with
attractive seating that won’t block
view for surveillance
• Improve connections to Centennial
Way and Sister Cities Linear Park
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 9
1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
Current Master Plan Goals
This master plan update for Orange
Memorial park seeks to achieve the
following goals:
• Engage the community and
stakeholders to better understand
desired amenities and improvements.
• Develop a master plan to help guide
future park improvements.
• Incorporate and study impacts of
current and proposed projects within
the park limits.
• Determine the best use of underutilized
areas of the park including the former
Old Mazzanti property
These goals were achieved through an
extensive master planning process which
is described in the following sections. To
ensure the master plan was responsive to
current community needs and desires, a
series of meetings were organized to collect
feedback from the public and stakeholders.
Additional input was gathered through
printed and online surveys.
Site Photo - Sculpture Garden
02 S I T E
UNDERSTANDING
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 11
2. SITE UNDERSTANDING
Overview
Many changes have taken place in the 15
years that have passed since the previous
master plan; both within the community
and the park itself. The City of South San
Francisco has grown from a population of
61,000 to almost 67,600 and the needs and
desires of the community have changed
with the population. Park improvements
have been completed since the previous
master plan with the addition of a new
playground, skatepark, the completion of
the recreation center including two new
basketball courts and restroom facilities
and the removal of the existing buildings on
the Old Mazzanti property. The Stormwater
Capture Project, at the southeast
quadrant, is currently under construction
with the Sports Field Improvement Project
to follow. The fi nal project will include new
lighting, synthetic turf fi elds (striping will
make provisions for one adult baseball
diamond, one adult softball diamond,
two youth baseball diamonds, two adult
soccer fi elds, two junior soccer fi elds, and
four youth soccer fi elds), a concession
stand, and enhanced furnishings and
planting. Lastly, planning is currently
underway for a new Aquatics Facility.
In addition to the development mentioned
above, the park also includes tennis courts,
bocce ball courts, an indoor pool, the artist
studios, walking trails, picnic areas, a picnic
shelter, the Sculpture Garden, various
Site Photo - Picnic shelter Site Photo - Colma Creek drainage channel Site Photo - Skate park Site Photo - Kaboom playground
12 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
Site Reconnaissance and Analysis
A site visit was conducted in May 2021. The
purpose of the visit was to familiarize team
members with the location, condition,
and context of the site. While at the site,
Callander Associates reviewed existing
relationships between park elements and
analyzed the opportunities and constraints
of the site. Team members walked the
site, observed park users patterns, and
compiled a photo log of the site. Although
the Stormwater Capture Project had
already begun construction, the Callander
team was able to examine the area and
adjacent features. All of this information was
cataloged for use throughout the process.
Opportunities and Constraints
The identified opportunities and constraints
for the development and expansion of
Orange Memorial park determined by
the site analysis and presented to the
City and public for input are as follows:
The 3.5 acre old Old Mazzanti property,
the artist studios and the skate park/City
material storage area present the three
greatest potential areas of expansion.
All 3 areas are either undeveloped or
under-utilized and when combined would
add 5 acres of usable park space. They
are all linked to each other and the Old
Mazzanti property is the ideal location for
additional sports fields and open space
while removing the skate park and artist
studio would create an opportunity to
open up access to this part of the park.
children play areas, and open space
for both passive and active recreation.
Furthermore, Orange Memorial park serves
as the location for city organized events
and various other public/private events.
Site Photos - Site reconnaissance data collection
PARK
LEGEND
Recreational Space
Open Space
Underutilized Areas
Parking
Under Construction
T w o - W a y V e h i c u l a r
Traffic
O n e - W a y V e h i c u l a r
Traffic
P e d e s t r i a n
Circulation
R e s i d e n t i a l
N e i g h b o r h o o d P a r k
Access Point
P e d e s t r i a n
Connection
Park Node
Park Entry
Restroom
Colma Creek
C e n t e n n i a l W a y
Trail
Property Line
Park Node
NORTH
N
RECREATION
FIELD
RECREATION
BUILDING
POOL
BUILDING
PARKING
(22)
PARKING (56)
PLAY
STRUCTURE
PARKING
(144)
PARKING
(19)
SCULPTURE
GARDEN
TENNIS
COURTS
ARTIST
STUDIO
PARKING
(6)
SKATE
PARK
BOCCE
BALL
BASKETBALL
COURTS
PICNIC AREA
PLAY
STRUCTURE
PARKING
(47)
PARKING
(37)
NEW BALL FIELD
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
POTENTIAL PARK
EXPANSION
POTENTIAL PARK
EXPANSION
POTENTIAL PARK
EXPANSION
MYRTLE AVE.
N. CANAL ST. COLMA CREEK
W. ORANGE AVE.
TENNIS DRIVE
CHESTNUT AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
POTENTIAL PARK
EXPANSION
PARALLEL
PARKING (15)
CALWATER
PROPERTY
COMMUNITY
GARDEN
PARK LANE
APARTMENTS
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
CALWATER
FACILITY
SSF HISTORICAL
SOCIETY
POTENTIAL PARK
CONNECTION
MAINTENANCE
ACCESS ROAD
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS PLAN
PARKING
(41)
ON STREET
PARKING (25)
ON STREET
PARKING (11)
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 13
Opportunities
• Strengthen pedestrian connection
between both sides of the park.
• Naturalize a portion of Colma Creek
to enhance park experience and
relationship between Colma Creek and
Orange Memorial park.
• Potentially renovate or relocate artist
studios.
• Utilize Old Mazzanti property to expand
park for additional recreation space.
• Utilize and strengthen sight lines and
pedestrian corridors through the park.
Constraints
• The visual appearance and division
of the park from the Colma Creek
drainage channel.
• Unsafe crossings for pedestrians within
streets and parking areas.
• Lack of access points and visibility to
Centennial Way Trail.
• Skate park location is not ideal as is, it
confl icts with potential park expansion.
2. SITE UNDERSTANDING
Figure 4 - Opportunities and Constraints Plan
03 O U T R E A C H
PROCESS
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 15
3. OUTREACH PROCESS
Overview
An essential part to a successful South San
Francisco master plan is receiving input
during development to ensure the plan
represents the needs and preferences of
project stakeholders and end users. The
Orange Memorial park master plan is a
product of feedback received from the
local community and several stakeholder
groups that were engaged during a series of
in-person and online events and meetings.
The events and meetings took place over
several months where the same participants
had the opportunity to monitor progress
and ensure their voices were being heard.
The outreach process was designed to
gather broad preferences at fi rst and
slowly refi ne the design documents in
response to the comments received. In
the beginning of the process, outreach
participants were encouraged to express
their ideas and desires without a preformed
agenda. Only after initial feedback
was received were design alternatives
prepared. The design alternatives were
eventually critiqued and refi ned into a
single preferred alternative, which was
further vetted through more review.
In order to maximize effi ciency, the
outreach process for updating the
Orange Memorial park master plan was
combined with outreach for updating the
City’s Centennial Way master plan. Both
projects were similar and the combined
effort worked to broaden public interest
and reach a larger audience.
Components of the outreach process
are described in the following sections.
Summaries of outreach meetings are
provided in Appendix A.
Figure 5 - Project Process Diagram
ARTS
TRAIL
PARK
2022
JUL
AUG
SEPT
OCT
NOV
DEC
2021 AUG
FEB
2022
MAR
JAN
PROCESS & SCHEDULE
FINAL MASTER PLAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
REFINED MASTER PLAN
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING #2
DRAFT MASTER PLAN
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING #1
OUTREACH EVENTS & COMMUNITY MEETING #2
OUTREACH EVENTS & COMMUNITY MEETING #1
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT & MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES
3 Master Plans, 1 Process
Help Envision your Community
ARTS TRAIL PARK
CITYWIDE CENTENNIAL ORANGE
+ +
PARK
ORANGE
TRAIL
CENTENNIAL
Online Survey Online Survey
ARTS +TRAIL+PARK
Please take a few minutes to complete the
following online surveys. Either scan the QR
codes or use the web links provided below.
Open House Event
Saturday, August 14, 2021
10:00 am - 1:00 pm
Joseph A. Fernekes Building in
Orange Memorial Park
781 Tennis Drive
South San Francisco, CA 94080
We Want to Hear from You!
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/
centennialwaytrail
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/
orangememorialpark 16 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
Public Outreach
Pop-up Events
In order to have a successful South San
Francisco outreach program it is necessary
to get the word out. In addition to
announcements delivered via the City’s
website, social media platforms, email
newsletters, and publications, the design
team attended various public events to
engage with the community. These popup events included Movie Night at Orange Park, the Parks and Recreation July Field Day
event, the City Hall Birthday Celebration,
and Halloween at Orange Park. During the
pop-up events, the design team handed out
fl yers, collected feedback, and advertised
upcoming community meetings.
Graphics Displays
To augment the meetings described below,
the City also posted master plan graphics
at various locations throughout the City and
asked the public to comment by answering
survey questions. Displays were posted at the
Orange Memorial Pool, Roberta Cerri Teglia
Center (formerly known as Magnolia Senior
Center), and Municipal Services Building.
Community Meeting #1
At the fi rst open house, the City and design
team introduced the master plan process
by sharing the project background and
goals. After reviewing a site analysis showing
opportunities and constraints, the public was
asked to vote on images that represented
potential site amenities that they wanted
to see in the forthcoming concept plans.
General comments and ideas were
also documented with written notes.
Figure 6 - Open House Handout
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 17
3. OUTREACH PROCESS
Community Meeting #2
At the second open house, the community
was presented with two alternatives for
the park. It was decided to segment the
northern portion of the park into two areas
to help facilitate more structured feedback
from the community. Everything west from
Eucalyptus Avenue was considered Area
A. Area B was considered everything east
of Eucalyptus Avenue including Colma
Creek. The design alternatives were
based on feedback received during the
fi rst community meeting. Preferences for
each alternative were collected through
survey questions and written notes.
The key differences between
the alternatives are as follows:
Area A in Alternative 1 included a new
bike pump track, skate park, parking
lot and partial artist studio which is
about one-third smaller than the existing
studio. Area B included the restoration
of Colma Creek. A new parks facility
was proposed south of Colma Creek
across from the Old Mazzanti property.
Area A in Alternative 2 included a youth
multi-purpose sports fi eld, restroom,
and parking lot. Area B included the
expansion of the Sculpture Garden, a
market/event walk and fi tness court. A
new community garden and greenhouse
was proposed south of Colma Creek
across from the Old Mazzanti property.
Both alternatives included variations of
additional picnic areas and connections
to Chestnut Avenue in Area A. New
pickleball courts, additional picnic areas,
unprogrammed turf areas, a shade
shelter/outdoor theater, an all abilities
playground, and a new swim center were
included in both alternatives for Area B.
Eliminating vehicular routes in the inner
portion of the northern portion of the park
was well favored and allows for better
pedestrian connectivity between areas.
The design alternatives are provided in
Appendix C for reference.
Outreach Photo - Pop up event #2, Parks and Recreation July Field Day event
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
CENTRAL GATHERING SHADE SHELTER / OUTDOOR THEATER ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND BIKE PUMP TRACK SKATE PARK PICKLEBALL COURTS NODES / PLAZAS COLMA CREEK RESTORATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 40’ 80’ 160’
(N)SKATE PARK PLAZA
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CHESTNUT AVE.
(N)ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
(E)
RECREATION
(E) BUILDING
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(N) PARKING
(N)PARKING
(E)
BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
OPEN TURF (N)RENOVATED AREA PLAYGROUND
(N)CREEK WALK /
NATURAL PLAY
(N)RENOVATED PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RENOVATED RESTROOM
(N)
ATHLETIC FIELDS
(E)
TENNIS
COURTS
(E)
BOCCE
COURTS
(N)
PARTIAL
ARTIST
STUDIOS
COLMA CREEK
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
(N)PARK FACILITIES
UNPROGRAMMED TURF AREAS
9 NATURAL PLAY
11 OUTDOOR LEARNING
10 SWIM CENTER
12 ADDITIONAL PICNIC AREAS
8 (E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
AREA A
AREA B
PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE 1
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
(N)ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
(E) RECREATION
(E) BUILDING
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(N)PARKING
(E)
BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
TENNIS
COURTS
(E) BOCCE
COURTS
(E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
AREA B
(N)SKATE PARK PLAZA
COLMA CREEK
AREA A
(N) PARKING
COURTS
(N) PARTIAL
ARTIST
STUDIOS
8 1
5 5
6 11
7 7
10 2
8 4
9 12
2 2
3 8
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
PARK
CENTRAL GATHERING ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND ADDITIONAL SOCCER FIELDS YOUTH BASEBALL PICKLEBALL COURTS
NODES / PLAZAS
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
2 MARKET/EVENT WALK
1 SHADE SHELTER / OUTDOOR THEATER
3 4 5 6 7
ADDITIONAL PICNIC AREAS
SWIM CENTER
UNPROGRAMMED TURF AREAS
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CHESTNUT AVE.
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
(E)
RECREATION
BUILDING (E)
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)
BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
OPEN TURF AREA (N)
ATHLETIC FIELDS
(E)
BOCCE
COURTS (N)
YOUTH MULTI-PURPOSE
FIELDS
(N)PARKING
(N)GREENHOUSE
(N)PARKING
(E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
(E)TENNIS
COURTS
(N)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
EXPANSION
(E)PARKING
(N)RENOVATED
PLAYGROUND
(N)RENOVATED PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RENOVATED RESTROOM
(N)PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE, TYP.
(E)COLMA
CREEK CHANNEL
(N)
ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
COLMA CREEK
0 40’ 80’ 160’
PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE 2
8 FITNESS COURT
10 12 13
9 PUBLIC ART
11 AREA A
AREA B TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
(E)
RECREATION
BUILDING (E)
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)
BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
BOCCE
COURTS
(N)PARKING
(E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
(E)TENNIS
COURTS
(N)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
EXPANSION
(N)
ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
AREA B
(N)
YOUTH MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS
(N)PARKING AREA A
1 1
2 2
2 3
4 5
6 6 10
9 12
7 7
8 8
11 COMMUNITY GARDEN
13 18 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
Figure 7 - Preliminary Design Alternatives
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 19
3. OUTREACH PROCESS
Outreach Photo - Community Open House #1
Parks and Recreation
Commission Meeting #1
The design team presented a summary
of the public outreach process and
comments received to the Parks and
Recreation Commission, along with
the design alternatives that had been
developed for each opportunity area. The
Commission provided further input, which
was used to develop a preferred plan.
Parks and Recreation
Commission Meeting #2
During a second meeting with the
Commission, a preferred plan was
presented for the entire trail corridor
along with a written master plan
report. Commission comments were
recorded and used to further refine the
master plan documents.
City Council Meeting
A presentation summarizing the entire
outreach process was presented to the
City Council along with the master plan
documents. The Council was asked to
provide comments on the master plan,
which were incorporated before the
final document was adopted.
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
ADDITIONAL PICNIC AREAS
CENTRAL GATHERING SHADE SHELTER / OUTDOOR THEATER ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND BIKE PUMP TRACK SKATE PARK PICKLEBALL COURTS
NODES / PLAZAS
COLMA CREEK RESTORATION
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 25, 2021
PARK
0 40’ 80’ 160’
(N)SKATE PARK PLAZA
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CHESTNUT AVE.
(N)ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
(E) RECREATION
(E) BUILDING
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(N) PARKING
(N)PARKING
(E)
BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
OPEN TURF (N)RENOVATED AREA PLAYGROUND
(N)CREEK WALK /
NATURAL PLAY
(N)RENOVATED PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RENOVATED RESTROOM
(N) ATHLETIC FIELDS
(E)
TENNIS
COURTS
(E)
BOCCE
COURTS
(N)
PARTIAL
ARTIST
STUDIOS
COLMA CREEK
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
(N)PARK FACILITIES
1 2 3 4 5 6
UNPROGRAMMED TURF AREAS
9 NATURAL PLAY
11 7
OUTDOOR LEARNING
10 SWIM CENTER
12 8 (E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
AREA A
AREA B
PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE 1
ADDITIONAL PICNIC AREAS
SWIM CENTER
ADDITIONAL SOCCER FIELDS PICKLEBALL COURTS
UNPROGRAMMED TURF AREAS
CENTRAL GATHERING ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND YOUTH BASEBALL
NODES / PLAZAS
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 25, 2021
PARK
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CHESTNUT AVE.
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
(E)
RECREATION
BUILDING (E)
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)
BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
OPEN TURF
AREA (N)
ATHLETIC FIELDS
(E)
BOCCE
COURTS (N)
YOUTH MULTI-PURPOSE
FIELDS
(N)PARKING
(N)PARKING
(E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
(E)TENNIS
COURTS
(N)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
EXPANSION
(E)PARKING
(N)RENOVATED
PLAYGROUND
(N)PARK FACILITIES
(N)RENOVATED PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RENOVATED RESTROOM
(N)PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE, TYP.
(E)COLMA
CREEK CHANNEL
(N)
ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
COLMA CREEK
0 40’ 80’ 160’
PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE 2
2 MARKET/EVENT WALK
1 SHADE SHELTER / OUTDOOR THEATER
3 4 5 6
8 FITNESS COURT
10 12
7 9
PUBLIC ART
11 AREA A
AREA B
AREA A
AREA A
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
ADDITIONAL PICNIC AREAS
CENTRAL GATHERING SHADE SHELTER / OUTDOOR THEATER ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND BIKE PUMP TRACK SKATE PARK PICKLEBALL COURTS
NODES / PLAZAS
COLMA CREEK RESTORATION
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 25, 2021
PARK
0 40’ 80’ 160’
(N)SKATE PARK PLAZA
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CHESTNUT AVE.
(N)ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
(E)
RECREATION
(E) BUILDING
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(N)
PARKING
(N)PARKING
(E) BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
OPEN TURF (N)RENOVATED AREA PLAYGROUND
(N)CREEK WALK /
NATURAL PLAY
(N)RENOVATED PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RENOVATED RESTROOM
(N) ATHLETIC FIELDS
(E)
TENNIS
COURTS
(E)
BOCCE
COURTS
(N)
PARTIAL
ARTIST
STUDIOS
COLMA CREEK
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
(N)PARK FACILITIES
1 2 3 4 5 6
UNPROGRAMMED TURF AREAS
9 NATURAL PLAY
11 7
OUTDOOR LEARNING
10 SWIM CENTER
12 8 (E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
AREA A
AREA B
PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE 1
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
ADDITIONAL PICNIC AREAS
CENTRAL GATHERING SHADE SHELTER / OUTDOOR THEATER ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND BIKE PUMP TRACK SKATE PARK PICKLEBALL COURTS
NODES / PLAZAS
COLMA CREEK RESTORATION
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 25, 2021
PARK
0 40’ 80’ 160’
(N)SKATE PARK PLAZA
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CHESTNUT AVE.
(N)ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
(E)
RECREATION
(E) BUILDING
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(N)
PARKING
(N)PARKING
(E) BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
OPEN TURF (N)RENOVATED AREA PLAYGROUND
(N)CREEK WALK /
NATURAL PLAY
(N)RENOVATED PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RENOVATED RESTROOM
(N) ATHLETIC FIELDS
(E)
TENNIS
COURTS
(E)
BOCCE
COURTS
(N)
PARTIAL
ARTIST
STUDIOS
COLMA CREEK
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
(N)PARK FACILITIES
1 2 3 4 5 6
UNPROGRAMMED TURF AREAS
9 NATURAL PLAY
11 7
OUTDOOR LEARNING
10 SWIM CENTER
12 8 (E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
AREA A
AREA B
PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE 1
ADDITIONAL PICNIC AREAS
SWIM CENTER
ADDITIONAL SOCCER FIELDS PICKLEBALL COURTS
UNPROGRAMMED TURF AREAS
CENTRAL GATHERING ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND YOUTH BASEBALL
NODES / PLAZAS
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 25, 2021
PARK
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CHESTNUT AVE.
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
(E)
RECREATION
BUILDING (E)
PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(E)
BASKETBALL
COURTS &
RESTROOM
(E)
OPEN TURF
AREA (N)
ATHLETIC FIELDS
(E)
BOCCE
COURTS (N)
YOUTH MULTI-PURPOSE
FIELDS
(N)PARKING
(N)PARKING
(E)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
(E)TENNIS
COURTS
(N)SCULPTURE
GARDEN
EXPANSION
(E)PARKING
(N)RENOVATED
PLAYGROUND
(N)PARK FACILITIES
(N)RENOVATED PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RENOVATED RESTROOM
(N)PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE, TYP.
(E)COLMA
CREEK CHANNEL
(N)
ENTRY
PLAZA,
TYP.
COLMA CREEK
0 40’ 80’ 160’
PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVE 2
2 MARKET/EVENT WALK
1 SHADE SHELTER / OUTDOOR THEATER
3 4 5 6
8 FITNESS COURT
10 12
7 9
PUBLIC ART
11 AREA A
AREA B
The City of South San Francisco is updating the Orange Memorial Park Master Plan. Please take a few minutes to complete this survey as we collect comments on the preliminary design alternatives. These design alternatives are based on feedback we received from the first survey and during the first series of outreach events.
We Want to Hear from You!
ORANGE PARK MASTER PLAN SURVEY
ALTERNATIVE #1
ALTERNATIVE #2
ADDITIONAL PICNIC AREAS
6 ADDITIONAL SOCCER FIELDS
5 YOUTH BASEBALL
4 BIKE PUMP TRACK
CENTRAL GATHERING
NODES / PLAZAS
3 1
1 1
2 3
6 SKATE PARK
2 4
4 5 6
Which alternative do you prefer for Area A?
Why did you choose that alternative?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ How can your preferred alternative be improved?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What else would you like to see at Area A?
________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ Alternative 1 Alternative 2
To fill out this survey online, go to https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/orangememorialpark2 or scan the QR code. If you have questions or would like more information, please email [email protected] Survey answers are due November 12th.
English Español
20 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
Stakeholder and Committee Meetings
In addition to the community events and
meetings described above, the design team
gave presentations to several stakeholder
groups and committees throughout the
outreach process. All the groups were asked
to provide feedback, which was combined
with input received during public outreach.
The City organized meetings with four
stakeholder groups. Members of each
stakeholder group are listed below and
each meeting included representation
from the City Manager’s offi ce:
• Property and Landowners: Members of
this group included BART, developers
involved in new projects along the trail
corridor, Kaiser Hospital, San Mateo
County, Cal Water, Barbara Butler,
Colma Creek Visioning Group, and the
City of San Bruno and Town of Colma.
• Community: This group represented
the South San Francisco Unifi ed School
District, Boys and Girls Club, Mothers
Club, Park Lane Apartments, Youth
Advisory Council, Community Garden
Group, Special Needs Group, Dog
Owners Group, Artist Studio Users,
Cultural Arts Commission, and South
San Francisco Friends of Parks and
Recreation.
• Recreation: This group included
representatives for Soccer, Softball/
Baseball, Swimming, Bocce Ball,
Pickleball, Tennis, Outdoor Fitness,
Seniors, Skateboarders, and BMX Bike
Riders.
• City Staff: Staff members representing
various City departments and
programs were gathered including
representatives from Park
Maintenance, Facility Maintenance,
Recreation (including Aquatics,
Childcare, Recreation Classes, Cultural
Arts, Rentals, Seniors, Sports, Special
Events/Publicity), and Economic and
Community Development.
The design team met with each stakeholder
group twice in virtual meetings to present
the project and collect comments.
Although not every member was present
during the stakeholder meetings, everyone
that received an invitation was provided
with a written meeting summary and
encouraged to fi ll out an online survey.
Master plan design documents were also
shared at meetings with different City
committees. Presentations were given
to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Figure 8 - Survey #2
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Farmer's market shelter
Additional skate park
Colma Creek restoration
Outdoor theater
New indoor pool
Fitness court
All abilities play area
Natural play features
Community garden
Additional picnic areas
Public art
Central gathering nodes
Unprogrammed turf areas
Youth baseball
Pickleball courts
Additional Soccer Fields
What amenities would you like to see added to the park? CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 21
Committee during regular meetings for
those groups. This meeting was intended
to give the group an overview of the
master plan update process and offered
a way to receive even more feedback.
Survey Data Collection
The purpose of the outreach process
described above was to collect input that
would guide master plan development.
During the outreach process, the primary
means of gathering feedback was through
a series of surveys. Surveys were offered to
event and meeting participants, and also
advertised to the general public through
flyers, newsletters, social media platforms,
City publications, and the City’s website.
The initial survey was released prior to
Community Meeting #1 and asked
participants to rank potential park amenities
and also provide their own ideas for how
they would like the park to be improved.
The survey was offered online and also in
paper format at Community Meeting #1.
Survey questions were also integrated into
the Agents of Discovery app, which was
tailored to a younger audience and allowed
input through a scavenger hunt format.
The second survey was released prior to
Community Meeting #2 and provided
a means of collecting comments on
preliminary design alternatives for each
identified area of the park. The survey was
offered online and also in paper format at
the community meeting. The online version
of the survey was converted to Spanish,
in order to reach a wider audience.
A key component of the second survey
was to determine the community’s
and stakeholders preferred location
for a new skate park, bike pump track
and sports fields. The input provided
about the preferred location of these
amenities was incorporated into the
preferred concepts for Orange Memorial
park and Centennial Trail.
A summary of the survey results
is presented in the Appendix B.
3. OUTREACH PROCESS
Figure 9 - Survey Data Collection Table
04 C O N C E P T
PLANS
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 23
4. CONCEPT PLANS
Overview
The concept plan described in the
following sections is the product of the
outreach process and is intended to
serve as a general framework for future
improvements of Orange Memorial
park. The selection and placement of
amenities is based on the feedback
received from the public, stakeholders,
and committees that participated in
outreach meetings and events. The
drawings are not meant to show fi nal
designs for improvements, but to provide
general direction and inspiration. Detailed
design development would be necessary
prior to implementing improvements.
Preferred Plan
The preferred plan is shown in Appendix
D and described below. Based on the
feedback and input received throughout
the process the preferred plan is a mix
of amenities from both alternatives.
The proposed pedestrian connections
from Chestnut Avenue and the existing
community gardens on Commercial Ave to
the park will provide desired access to this
part of the park. Although the acquisition of
the Cal Water property is not being pursued
at the moment, Cal Water is receptive to
further discussions about pedestrian access
along their property. Any future work will
require coordination with Cal Water.
Figure 10 - Perspective of proposed shade shelter/theater and all abilities playground CHESTNUT AVE.
COLMA CREEK
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
(E)PARKING
(N)PARKING
(N)RESTROOM / CONCESSION
BUILDING
(N)CENTRAL GATHERING
NODE / PLAZA
(N)PICKLEBALL COURTS
(E)BOCCE COURTS
(N)PICNIC AREA
(N)SHADE SHELTER
& PICNIC AREA
(N)PEDESTRIAN PATH
(N)BLEACHERS
(N)PEDESTRIAN
PATH
(N)GATHERING NODE /
PICNIC AREA
(E)COMMUNITY
GARDENS
(N)RENOVATED
PLAYGROUND
(N)CREEK WALK /
NATURAL PLAY
(N)RENOVATED
PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RE
(E)CE
(E)TENNIS COURTS
(N)ARTIST STUDIOS /
MAKER SPACES
(N)PARK MAINTENANCE
FACILITIES
(E)SCULPTURE GARDEN
PREFERRED CONCEPT PLAN
(N)YOUTH
MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS
(N)PICNIC AREA
0.1 MILE TO
CIVIC CAMPUS
PARK
24 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
Figure 11 - Preferred Concept Plan
TENNIS DRIVE W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
0 40’ 80’ 160’
(N)ENTRY PLAZA, TYP.
MARKET/EVENT WALK
ELEVATION, REFER TO
FIGURE 13 ON PAGE 28
(N)COLMA CREEK
RESTORATION
CONCESSION STAND/
RESTROOM
CONCEPTUAL
PERSPECTIVE OF COLMA
CREEK RESTORATION,
REFER TO FIGURE 12 ON
PAGE 26
(E)RECREATION
BUILDING
(E)PARKING
PERSPECTIVE OF SHADE
SHELTER, REFER TO
FIGURE 10 ON PAGE 23
(N)MARKET/
EVENT WALK
(N)ALL ABILITIES
PLAYGROUND (E)PARKING
(N)CENTRAL GATHERING
NODE / PLAZA
S
(N)PARKING
(N)SWIM CENTER
(N)VETERAN’S
MEMORIAL
(N)SHADE SHELTER/
OUTDOOR THEATER
(N)UNPROGRAMMED
TURF AREA
(E)BASKETBALL COURTS
& RESTROOM
(E)OPEN TURF
AREA
ENOVATED RESTROOM
ENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL
ATHLETIC FIELDS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
S
N
F10
F12
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 25
4. CONCEPT PLANS
26 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
There was not a clear favorite between Area
A alternatives amongst the community,
however when given the option, there was
a strong preference to locate the sports
fields at Orange Memorial park rather than
along Centennial Trail. Additionally, placing
multi-purpose fields on the Old Mazzanti
property keeps the park open to future
connections to the Cal Water property if it
is acquired in the future. The multi-purpose
field layout allows for one youth baseball
field, one Bronco baseball field (ages 11-
12) and one U-12 soccer field. Although
baseball fields are shown, the area is
reserved for sports fields in general and it
will need to be analyzed which sports to
Figure 12 - Conceptual perspective of Colma Creek Restoration CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 27
implement based on community needs
at the time of development. New parking
was provided to accommodate the influx
of users to this area of the park. The picnic
area to the west of the fields was redesigned
to provide a larger, more contiguous
space and additional picnic areas were
provided in between both ball fields.
A hierarchy of pathways will be provided
throughout the park to accommodate
various users and passive opportunities.
Walkway loops will include mile markers
while pathways for maintenance access
will be a minimum 12 feet wide and
culminate with space for turnarounds.
4. CONCEPT PLANS
MARKET/EVENT WALK ELE
planting area
pedestrian lighting
28 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
The central connection from Eucalyptus
Avenue to the bridge across Colma Creek
eliminated the loop road to strengthen
this pedestrian corridor and create a
centrally located gathering node/plaza
for park users. In addition, the redesign
allowed for an additional picnic area
to be located adjacent to the bocce
ball courts and six pickleball courts. The
increase in pickleball courts from what
was provided on the initial alternatives will
meet the anticipated growth of the sport.
The main features from the Area B
alternatives that were favored were the
restoration of Colma Creek, the market/
event walk and the fi tness court. The idea
of beautifying the creek and providing
an accessible space that can be used
for educational and passive opportunities
was very enticing to the community and
stakeholders. The design had to be slightly
modifi ed to work in cohesion with the
layout of the multi-purpose fi eld, but for
the most part remained unchanged from
the originally proposed design. Most of the
creek widening would occur on the northern
side because of the space limitations from
the Stormwater Capture Project. The
fl exible design of the market/event walk
provides a space for farmer’s markets and
events while providing picnic and seating
when events aren’t being held. While there
wasn’t enough space for an outdoor fi tness
court, an indoor fi tness center is expected
to be included within the new swim center
and additional fi tness stations are planned
along the adjacent Centennial Trail.
All ability play was critical to the
community, stakeholders, City and
Figure 13 - Market/Event Walk Elevation
EVATION
market walk shelter concrete seatwall
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 29
4. CONCEPT PLANS
committees. The proposed playground is
roughly the same size of the Red Morton
Magical Bridge Playground in Redwood
City (approximately 0.70 acres). The
proposed shade shelter/outdoor theater
and unprogrammed turf area are spacious
and provide an area for the City to hold
organized events. Although the turf area
was slightly reduced in size, it’s large
enough for a U-12 soccer fi eld. The entry
plaza along Orange Avenue not only
creates a better connection within the park,
but also develops a main entrance to the
park. Smaller entrance nodes have been
provided along Orange Avenue to match
the design of the new sports fi elds to the south.
Community members expressed their love
for the existing pool and hope that it stays
open if a new swim center should be
constructed. The new swim center location
along Orange Avenue will allow for the
existing pool to continue to operate during
its construction. Alongside the swim center
design, a thorough study had been done
to determine the best location within the
park to relocate the Veteran’s Memorial.
The preferred location was determined by
its high visibility along Orange Ave but also
this location provides enough space to
accommodate roughly 120 guest for any
type of Veteran events and gatherings.
After further discussions and outreach
to stakeholders it was determined that
skate spaces would be more desirable
than a traditional skate park. Various
spaces outside of the main pedestrian
routes throughout the park can act
as skate spaces such as the central
30 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
gathering node/plaza at Orange Avenue
and west of the bocce ball courts.
The majority of the layout of the southern
portion of the park will remain unchanged.
The Stormwater Capture Project is
nearing completion while the Sports Field
Improvement Project will be completed
soon there after. Due to the fact that park
will be expanding, it was important to keep
a park facility onsite to store maintenance
equipment and material. A new parks
facility is proposed south of Colma Creek
across from the Old Mazzanti property
adjacent to the stormwater capture
maintenance driveway. Small artist studios/
maker spaces are also proposed adjacent
Figure 14 - Materials Standards Imagery
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 31
4. CONCEPT PLANS
to the park facility with the intention of
continuing to provide on-site opportunities
for artists although at a smaller scale.
Smaller features of the southern
portion of the park addressed were
renovating the existing playground,
picnic shelter and restroom in place.
These features are reaching the end of
their functional lifespan and will be in
need of renovation in the near future.
Refer to Appendix F for the complete
updated materials standards for the
park. The planting material has been
updated to more drought resistant
and low maintenance species while
the furnishings standards have been
updated for a more modern park look.
Lighting/Artifi cial Turf
Installing lighting and artifi cial turf on the
sports fi elds at Orange Memorial park has
been a topic brought up by community
members throughout the process.
The Sports Field Improvement Project
slated to be fi nished in 2023 will provide
Figure 15 - Youth Multi-Purpose Fields
much needed illuminated fi elds for the
community. Sports stakeholder group
members have expressed desire that any
new fi elds should be illuminated to expand
practice time after normal work hours.
Having both lighting and artifi cial turf would
expand the usable hours in a day and the
days per year that games can be played.
With the artifi cial turf, games would not
have to be canceled because the fi elds
are still too wet from rainstorms. Other
benefi ts of artifi cial turf include reduced
maintenance costs and reduction of water
usage. Potential light pollution to adjacent
residents may be mitigated through the
use off cut-out style fi xtures that maximize
control of light spill. Additional studies and
outreach will have to be conducted in order
to determine the feasibility of lighted fi elds
in this location. For this master plan, natural
turf fi elds were included in the estimate.
The installation of artifi cial turf and lighting
have been included as an additional
alternate for City estimating purposes and
are included in the overall estimate.
32 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
AREA SIGN WAYFINDING/ PARK RULES
3’-6”
2’-0”
4’-0”
8’-0”
2’-6”
SIGNAGE FAMILY
MATERIALS: MATERIALS:
Top: Corten steel, Aluminum
acrylic lettering
Bottom: Concrete,
inset logo
Signage Program
City-wide Park Signage Program
With the signs at Orange Memorial park
in need of an upgrade, the City decided
to use this opportunity to develop a
family of signs that can be used at all
park facilities. Currently the City has a
mixture of signs that vary at each park
location and would like to create a
unifi ed park system through its signage.
Inspiration images were compiled of
various signage around the Bay including
existing South San Francisco parks
and features that defi ne the City. Two
alternatives were ultimately developed.
The fi nal designs were inspired by the
shapes of the San Bruno mountains.
Figure 17 - Signage Family Final Design
Figure 16 - Inspiration Images
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 33
ENTRY SIGN
14’-10”
4’-4”
MATERIALS:
Top: Corten steel, acrylic lettering
Bottom: Concrete, inset lettering and logo
4. CONCEPT PLANS
Figure 18 - Inspiration Images
05 IMPLEMENTATION
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 35
5. IMPLEMENTATION
Cost Estimate
To assist with developing a phasing strategy
and allocating funding for improvements,
an estimate of probable construction costs
was prepared for the preferred plan and
broken down into areas (see diagram below).
The areas were separated in a manner that
allowed items to be built independently
of one another to the maximum extent
possible so that the project could be
constructed as monies became available.
The City has allocated a budget for the new
aquatic center (area 1) of $49 million. Since
the design of this project is currently out to
RFP, these costs have not been developed.
Dollar fi gures are based on current (2023)
construction costs and are expected
to increase over time due to infl ation.
When budgeting for implementation, it
is recommended to add 6% infl ation for
every year after 2023. The total estimated
cost for each area is summarized below.
A more detailed cost breakdown for
each phase is provided in Appendix E.
Funding Sources
Funding for improvements outlined in this
master plan would likely need to come
from a mix of local municipal sources
and external grant applications. Potential
funding sources for elements of the
master plan could include the California
Land and Water Conservation Fund
Program, local and private donations,
and park dedication fees from local
developments. However, when grant
opportunities arise, they will be easier to
apply for now that desired improvements
are defi ned and documented.
Area Estimated Cost
1 $49,510,110
2 $22,947,990
3 $15,522,170
4 $14,203,520
5 $11,106,740
Total Estimated Cost $113,290,530
TENNIS DRIVE
W. ORANGE AVE.
CHESTNUT AVE.
ANTOINETTE LN.
AREA 4
AREA 5
AREA 2
AREA 1
AREA 3
COLMA CREEK
COMMERCIAL AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
Figure 19 - Phasing Diagram
06 APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
Meeting Summaries
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain Revised August 5, 2021
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: July 28, 2021
Time: 2:30 – 4:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Jacob Gilchrist, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Devin Stenhouse, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
Calwater
Ross Moilan, [email protected]
Mike Utz, [email protected]
Rob Seeley, [email protected]
Barbara Butler Artist-Builder
Barbara Butler, [email protected]
SummerHill Apartment Communities (988 El Camino Real)
Elaine Breeze (EB), [email protected]
L37 (1051 Mission)
Brian Baker, [email protected]
PMA/Lane Partners (Southline)
Sabrina Alonso, [email protected]
SyRes Properties (410 Noor)
Glen Ceridono, [email protected]
BART
Paul Voix, [email protected]
Town of Colma
Angelika Abellana, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 5, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Opportunities and constraints plans for the Centennial Way Trail Master Plan and Orange Memorial Park Master Plan were presented during the meeting to facilitate feedback from stakeholder groups. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.
Item Action / Due Date
CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL
The trail master plan is being updated in response to new areas within the trail corridor that are now available for constructing improvements and several adjacent developments that are either planned or under construction.
BART Comments
1. Any improvements along the trail corridor would need to be reviewed by BART, but in general improvements are likely acceptable as long as they don't impact the integrity of BART underground tunnels and infrastructure via footings, weight impacts, etc.
a. Secure areas must be excluded from study including vent structures and sub-stations. These areas are already fenced off.
2. The City could program the plaza at the South San Francisco BART station for events if desired.
a. There are precedents at Castro Valley, 24th Street, and 16th Street stations where farmer's market and artisan events are held.
b. Additional security for events is sometimes a concern and may need to be paid for by the event organizers.
Developer Comments
3. The 410 Noor development will offer mostly studio and 1- bedroom apartments for rent, and the typical resident will likely be young and single.
a. Private on-site amenities include a gym, lounge,
entertainment room, and work from home space.
b. A community garden will be available to both residents and the public.
c. Desired off-site amenities include access to bike trails, a playground, and a place to take pets.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 5, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
4. The 1477 Huntington development will provide public
access to Centennial Way from Huntington Avenue.
5. The 988 El Camino Real development (SummerHill) will likely rent to young adults, either singles or couples.
a. Private on-site amenities include retail space, a gym, club room, work from home space, hot-tub, BBQ, seating areas, bike parking, and a dog run.
b. A public outdoor fitness park will be constructed along the Centennial Way trail, and the Chestnut Avenue pedestrian crossing will be improved. EB to provide more information on the outdoor fitness park.
Already provided
c. Bike and scooter rental is not a part of the development plans. However, there are two public bike parking areas at the fitness park that might be able to accommodate bike or scooter rental if needed.
d. Desired off-site amenities include places to take pets, flexible spaces for lounging and playing games (i.e., grass mounds, open lawn areas, etc.), cornhole, concrete ping pong tables, basketball, and pickleball.
6. The 1051 Mission development is anticipated to house a mixed demographic of working singles and families. About 20% of the units will be affordable housing.
a. On-site amenities include a child care facility, retail space, outdoor plaza, parking area that can be programmed for
events (farmer's market, food truck, etc.), pedestrian/bike connections to El Camino Real and Mission Road, a
footbridge to Kaiser Hospital, playground, fitness court, and sculpture/lawn area.
b. The location of the footbridge to Kaiser has not been finalized and it could move farther north depending on
Kaiser's plans for redeveloping their campus.
c. Restoration of Colma Creek to a more natural channel will be explored, including softening up the concrete channel and restoring plant growth.
d. Desired off-site amenities include a dog park and bike share stations.
Town of Colma
7. Colma does not currently have plans for extending the trail north.
8. There are plans for bike lanes on El Camino Real which could extend south to the South San Francisco city limit.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 5, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
ORANGE PARK
Plans for a new pool building and the construction of new synthetic turf fields have prompted an update to the park master plan. The City also wants to evaluate what uses are working well and which ones might function better if changed.
Calwater Comments
9. Public access from Chestnut Avenue into Orange Park along the Colma Creek channel is desired by the City.
10. Access to Orange Park from Commercial Avenue through the City’s community gardens and Calwater property is another potential connection that may be beneficial.
11. Calwater’s treatment plant may expand to process
groundwater into drinking water, thus the groundwater area on the south side of the plant is important to protect.
12. There are several wells on the property that also need protection.
13. An underground water line that crosses under Colma Creek and runs north to the treatment plant must not be impacted.
14. Calwater is open to resuming discussions with the City on usage of their property for access to Orange Park.
Barbara Butler Comments
15. Barbara is exploring the possibility of renovating the existing artist studios at Orange Park.
a. Some of the buildings would be occupied by Barbara and her staff.
b. Other buildings could be used for classroom training and mentoring, or rented by other artists.
c. The studios could periodically be opened for public access and events.
16. The proposed renovation fits within the existing artist studios footprint, but additional space for parking would be desirable.
Other Comments
17. Eucalyptus Avenue could potentially provide a vehicular access to the park from Commercial Avenue if the gate was removed. Impacts to neighboring homes would need to be
evaluated first.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg2.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.
Submitted by:
Nate Ritchie
CALA
cc: All attendees
Adena Friedman, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Shawnterra Moore, SSFUSD, [email protected]
David Hartman, Boys and Girls Club, [email protected] Nadia Rodriguez, Mothers Club, [email protected]
Alex Kolcek, Park Lane Apartments, [email protected] Henryk De-Rewenda, Community Garden, [email protected] Ethan Mizzi, Youth Advisory Council, [email protected] Edith Arias, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Dora Alvarez, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Elvira Valencia, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Martha Guzman, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Mary Ann Cruz, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Petra Lopez, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Andy Montenegro, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Norma Hernandez, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Christopher Espiritu, SSF BPAC, [email protected] Angela Duldulao, Cultural Arts Commission, [email protected] Marie Patea, SSF Friends of Parks and Recreation, [email protected] Kelli Jo Cullinan, SSF Friends of Parks and Recreation, [email protected] Attachments: Outreach Event Flyer and Survey Link, one page Agents of Discovery Game Flyer, one page
Outreach Graphic Exhibits, August 2021, three pages
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain August 16, 2021
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: August 10, 2021
Time: 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
South San Francisco Unified School District
Bill Savidge, [email protected]
Daina Lujan, [email protected]
Full of Fun Camp (Special Needs Group)
Herbert Rahm, [email protected]
SSF Parks and Recreation Commission
Bill Lock, [email protected]
Ruth DeNardi, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
Dania Castro, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholder groups an opportunity to provide feedback regarding amenities that they would like to see within Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park. The information collected will be considered during the preparation of master plan updates for the trail and park. A brief background of previous master planning efforts was presented along with current graphics illustrating opportunities and constraints. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg2.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
School District Comments
1. SSF High School and Los Cerritos Elementary School are both adjacent to the trail and neither school is currently utilizing the trail to its full potential.
a. Student use of the trail is limited since the schools are fenced off and direct connections are not currently
provided.
b. Providing trail access to both schools may be beneficial to those who live locally within the neighborhood and do not drive to school.
c. If direct access was provided, gates would need to be implemented that restrict public access to school grounds.
2. Students commuting by bicycle to SSF High School might benefit from a better trail connection.
a. Bike parking could potentially be implemented nearby to encourage use.
3. The SSF High School track team could potentially use the trail for practice.
4. Fitness stations along the trail adjacent to SSF High School might be useful for PE classes and sport teams.
5. Safety at the Orange Avenue street crossing near Los Cerritos Elementary School could be improved.
a. Crosswalk markings are faded and should be repainted. b. A walking audit had been completed for the Safe Routes to School program which may have additional
recommendations.
City sent report to
CALA
6. A connection from the Los Cerritos Elementary School playground to the trail corridor could provide an opportunity for student activities such as nature walks or outdoor learning.
7. Community gardens adjacent to the schools might provide benefit, since there are few or no facilities within school grounds.
8. More trail lighting could improve student safety for those that use the trail early in the morning or after school events.
Full of Fun Camp Comments
9. Sensory play features and educational/interactive play elements could be assets for those with special needs.
10. Having a play structure with inclusive play and safety features is desirable.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg2.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
11. If frisbee golf is implemented along the trail, smaller putting courses may be more suitable due to space constraints.
12. Picnic areas and restroom interiors at the park are outdated and could benefit from being renovated.
13. One concern with adding a shared bike/scooter program is users leaving the bikes/scooters in unauthorized locations. This has been a problem in the past.
Parks and Recreation Commission Comments
14. Adding a public play structure to the trail could be a good addition.
15. Providing emergency call boxes might make trail users feel safer.
16. The trail crossing at Chestnut Avenue and Antoinette Lane is difficult and safety is a concern.
a. Improvements are currently underway and should be
monitored for efficacy.
17. Screening trees or other physical barriers might protect the trail corridor from strong prevailing winds.
18. Joint use of the trail by bicyclists and pedestrians sometimes causes congestion and safety concerns.
a. Widening the dirt shoulder on both sides of the trail or widening the paved area could help alleviate congestion. b. Cyclist education could also help, either through
permanent signage or by periodically organizing pop-up
stations with bicycle safety educational materials.
Next Steps
19. Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group. Survey links are attached to the meeting summary.
20. Meeting participants can also provide feedback through the Agents of Discovery game using a smart phone. Instructions are attached to the meeting summary.
21. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 5, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
Process and Next Steps
18. The outreach process has and will include other stakeholder groups and the larger community.
19. Stakeholders can fill out online surveys for both Orange Park and Centennial Way to provide further comments.
20. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.
The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.
Submitted by:
Nate Ritchie
CALA
cc: All attendees
Greg Mediati, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Adena Friedman, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Will McPhee, Overton Moore Properties (1477 Huntington), [email protected] Michael Johnson, Overton Moore Properties (1477 Huntington), [email protected] John Skerry, Kaiser Permanente, [email protected]
Makena Wong, County Flood and Sea Level Rise (OneShoreline), [email protected] Len Materman, County Flood and Sea Level Rise (OneShoreline), [email protected] Richard Mullane, Colma Creek Visioning Group, [email protected] Ann Mottola, San Bruno, [email protected]
Danielle Brewer, San Bruno, [email protected]
Attachments: Outreach Event Flyer and Survey Link, July 2021, one page Outreach Graphic Exhibits, July 2021, three pages
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain August 16, 2021
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: August 12, 2021
Time: 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale Jr., [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Brian Noce, [email protected]
Bill Stridbeck, [email protected]
Marcus Nava, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
SSF Parks and Recreation Commission
Ruth DeNardi, [email protected]
BMX Bicyclists
Jaxon Lazzari, [email protected]
Aquatic Group
Khai Vu, [email protected]
Rosalind Stewart, [email protected]
Skateboarders
Paul DeMartini (PDM), [email protected]
Ryan Motzek, [email protected]
Chris Kraft, [email protected]
Bocce Ball Group
Kay McGough, [email protected]
Softball/Baseball Leagues
Juan Bustos, [email protected]
Woody Rael, [email protected]
Jim Elder, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg3.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
Dania Castro, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholder groups an opportunity to provide feedback regarding amenities that they would like to see within Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park. The information collected will be considered during the preparation of master plan updates for the trail and park. A brief background of previous master planning efforts was presented along with current graphics illustrating opportunities and constraints. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.
Item Action / Due Date
Softball/Baseball Leagues
1. After the synthetic turf fields at Orange Park are completed, the number of fields available to softball/baseball leagues throughout the city should meet current needs but may not accommodate future league growth.
a. This assumes continued use of school facilities for league play, not just city facilities.
2. There is some concern about the use of school facilities. a. It can be more difficult for the city leagues to obtain access for practices and games at some school sites,
particularly Parkway Heights field.
b. Maintenance of the school fields seems to be less
consistent than city-maintained facilities. There are
sometimes problems with irrigation scheduling.
3. There are concerns with allowing dogs to use baseball/softball fields and dog owners not cleaning up after their pets. a. Consider prohibiting dogs on fields used for league play.
4. After the synthetic turf fields at Orange Park are completed, baseball and soccer will be competing for use of the same facility, so careful coordination between the leagues will be necessary.
5. There is some concern that city maintenance resources will be occupied maintaining the new synthetic turf fields at Orange Park and other natural turf facilities might not be maintained as well as they are today.
6. The new synthetic turf fields should be designed with multiple base path lengths (60’ and 70’), so they can accommodate more than one age group.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg3.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
BMX Bicyclists
7. A bike pump track within Orange Park could be beneficial, as there currently isn’t a track locally.
a. A petition has been organized that shows support for a pump track facility within the city.
8. Good examples of BMX facilities include McLaren Bike Park in San Francisco, Santa Clara PAL.
Skateboarders
9. The existing skatepark within Orange Park doesn’t match the desires of many users.
a. The existing asphalt pavement is rough and the modular metal ramps are not ideal for most skaters.
b. A mix of transition style skateboarding (ramps), bowls, and street style skateboarding elements would likely be more popular. Integrating the different styles is a more modern approach to building a skatepark.
10. Having skateable elements that feel inclusive within the overall park (“skate spaces”) are more desirable than a fenced-off area.
a. Examples of skate spaces include Oculus Park in
Burlingame and urban plazas in general.
b. Other good skatepark examples include designs by Spohn Ranch, skateparks in Barcelona Spain, and Mayfair
Skatepark in San Jose.
11. A petition was organized that showed support for improving the current skatepark.
12. The Transition Project skate group conducted a survey of members that may provide insights on local skateboarder preferences.
PDM provided
survey results
13. Providing skate features along Centennial Trail that are off the main path could be another alternative to a concentrated park.
a. It would be important for the skate spaces to have
enough separation so they don’t conflict with pedestrians and cyclists.
Aquatic Group
14. If a new pool building is constructed in Orange Park, the existing pool facility should remain open during construction because there is a high demand for its use and its consistent staff presence is an asset for park users.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg3.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
15. If a new pool building is constructed, the existing building could be repurposed for another use, such as a gymnasium or community hall.
16. Any new pool should be larger than the existing pool to better accommodate the high usage.
a. Ideally there would be two pools, one to accommodate swim classes and older use groups and a separate pool for lap swimmers.
b. A pool facility with more capacity could allow local swim teams to use the pool for swim meets.
Bocce Ball Group
17. The current facility consists of four outdoor courts and two covered courts.
18. The current courts are fully utilized and should not be reduced or removed.
19. It can be difficult to schedule league use of the courts for play, practice, and tournaments because of the requirement to maintain the courts for public use during certain times. a. It would be helpful if there was a mechanism for locking the courts during times when they are reserved for league use.
20. On the four uncovered courts, overhead shade at the end of the court where the ball is thrown would be beneficial to protect players from the sun during warm months.
21. The exiting bocce facility could benefit from a multi-use space adjacent to the courts that would allow for larger events to take place.
Next Steps
22. Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group. Survey links are attached to the meeting summary.
23. Meeting participants can also provide feedback through the Agents of Discovery game using a smart phone. Instructions are attached to the meeting summary.
24. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg3.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.
Submitted by:
Nate Ritchie
CALA
cc: All attendees
Adena Friedman, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Patty Gomez, Soccer League, [email protected]
Brian Mansell, Soccer League, [email protected]
Mike Pizzo, Soccer League, [email protected]
Troy & Dana Hartman, Aquatic Group, [email protected] Amanda Leigh, Pickleball Group, [email protected]
Kurtis Wong, Pickleball Group, [email protected]
Mike Redondo, Tennis Group, [email protected]
Anthony Dizon-Barron, Tennis Group, [email protected] Stanley Chi, Tennis Group, [email protected]
Alex Khoo, Tennis Group, [email protected]
Lily Oweyeung, Tennis Group, [email protected]
Devin Stenhouse, Outdoor Fitness Group, [email protected] Joanne Calvert, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Jeannette Holt, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Chitra Dhingra, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Diane Zellmer, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Ron Malone, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Parker Holloway, Skateboarders, [email protected]
Attachments: Outreach Event Flyer and Survey Link, one page Agents of Discovery Game Flyer, one page
Outreach Graphic Exhibits, August 2021, three pages
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain August 24, 2021
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
Date: August 19, 2021
Time: 10:00 – 11:00 am
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
Brandon Cutajar, [email protected]
Kelli Jo Cullinan, [email protected]
Kari Jung, [email protected]
Zachary Kust, [email protected]
Catherine Misener, [email protected]
Kimberly Morrison, [email protected]
Laura Armanino, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Brian Noce, [email protected]
Erin O'Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Ercie Santos, [email protected]
Devin Stenhouse, [email protected]
Brian Crume, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give City staff an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plans. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.
Item
Centennial Trail Comments
1. The annual Fun Run could potentially utilize the trail or another similar running event could be programmed on the trail.
2. If the trail had more access points it might better serve as an alternative mode of transportation to events at Orange Park and could be promoted as such.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
August 24, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg4.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item
3. A small (U8) soccer field off of the trail could reduce demand on the new multi-use synthetic turf field at Orange Park if it had associated parking.
4. Interactive art elements along the trail such as outdoor musical instruments could create opportunities for public performances.
5. Story walks for children could be held along the trail if there were small gathering areas.
6. More access points along the trail should accompany amenities that are added.
7. Exercise equipment along the trail could accommodate walking or agility training classes.
a. Equipment should be adaptable for use by seniors and those of all abilities. b. Classes could travel between different exercise stations and also educate users on how to use the equipment properly.
c. Sunset Blvd in San Francisco is an example of dispersed exercise stations.
Orange Park Comments
8. Picnic areas and shelters get high use so they should not be removed.
9. The Pickleball community would like to see permanent courts.
10. Artist studios could be adapted to host artist in residence, gallery showings, or community working rooms (for example a wood shop with tools that can be used by the public once they have been through training classes). a. Studios could be open to special needs groups during specific times.
11. Unprogrammed field space is important for unstructured play.
12. Community gardens could become a valuable asset as more apartment housing is developed.
13. When programming the Mazzanti property, consider how it would interact with the Calwater property if it becomes available in the future.
14. Currently the Mazzanti property is used to hold landscape materials. Adding material bays for compost, infield fines, wood chips, etc. is desired.
15. A plant nursery space might be an asset for the city and could host a volunteer program.
16. The potential park expansion area on the south side of Colma Creek shown on the Opportunities & Constraints Plan is not currently reserved for any specific type of use.
17. An outdoor theater could be incorporated with the artist studios for performing arts.
18. A garage or satellite corp. yard to store City maintenance equipment and trucks would be helpful since the need for equipment storage is expected to increase and the artist studios are currently used for storage.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
August 24, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg4.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item
19. Childcare, sports, the historical society and other groups currently store supplies in the artist studios and will need another building for storage if the studios are redeveloped.
20. It was discussed to potentially shrink the main parking lot, but its current size and location is likely well utilized as is and shouldn't be changed. a. The parking lot could be beautified by adding larger canopy trees or other landscape.
21. Access across the Calwater property could improve circulation throughout the park, either from Commercial Avenue through the community garden or from Chestnut Avenue along Colma Creek.
22. A bridge across Colma Creek connecting the two potential expansion areas could be helpful.
Outreach Suggestions
23. Good locations to collect user feedback include the pool building at Orange Park, Fernekes Building, Magnolia Center, and City Hall.
24. In addition to distributing surveys, preliminary design alternatives could be displayed at locations throughout the city to collect feedback.
25. More engagement with Kaiser might be useful to find out what amenities hospital staff would like to see.
26. Provide an announcement in the next senior newsletter about upcoming meetings.
Next Steps
27. Online surveys are available for staff to complete. Survey links are provided below:
a. Orange Park: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/OrangeMemorialParkStaff b. Centennial Trail: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CentennialWayTrailStaff
28. Staff can suggest events and locations that could be used for further public outreach. Suggestions for additional stakeholder groups are also welcome.
The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.
Submitted by:
Nate Ritchie
CALA
cc: All attendees
Attachments: Outreach Graphic Exhibits, August 2021, three pages
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
October 26, 2021 Sustain
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting #5
Date: October 14, 2021
Time: 3:00 – 4:30 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Adenda Friedman, [email protected]
Nell Selander, [email protected]
Calwater
Ross Moilan, [email protected]
Mike Utz, [email protected]
L37 (1051 Mission)
Brian Baker, [email protected]
Overton Moore Properties (1477 Huntington)
Will McPhee, [email protected]
San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise District
Makena Wong, [email protected]
Colma Creek Visioning Group
Richard Mullane, [email protected]
BART
Paul Voix, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Dania Castro, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholders an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plan alternatives.
The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 26, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg5.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL
1. Providing tree canopies wherever possible along the trail is highly encouraged.
Opportunity Area #1
2. Connectivity/access points from residential buildings to the trail should be considered. Alternative #1 proposes a better
connection from the property to the trail.
3. Developer for 1477 Huntington suggested that parking would make sense in this area. Parking in this location will continue to be studied as there are space constraints. While not shown in either alternative, parking was discussed closer to West Orange. Parking would require coordination and approval from the PUC.
4. Developer for 1477 Huntington liked both alternatives, however Alternative #1 was preferred most.
Opportunity Area #3
5. Makena Wong suggests looking at opportunities to soften the edges of Colma Creek without compromising the flood
protection. Additional studies would be required.
6. Opportunity Area #3 has some space to soften the edges of the creek along the entire span.
a. This span of the creek is a low flow area and with the trail at a much higher elevation than the creek.
b. Any accessibility into the creek would most likely eat into park space.
c. Terracing the creek would have to be considered to
provide access to the creek. Opportunities to integrate terracing into a park element such as an amphitheater
could be considered.
d. Meandering the trail would provide opportunities to soften the edge of the creek.
7. The developer of L37 noted that during their outreach, dog runs were highly desired, but could not be placed on the L37 development site, so a dog run nearby would be valuable.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 26, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg5.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK
8. The idea of detention of Colma Creek flows in the park was a point of contention during previous community outreach
efforts. Richard Mullane suggested that the bike pump track & skate park location was a great opportunity for detention.
9. Cisterns that are currently being placed underneath new ballfields are focused for water quality and not flood
mitigation.
10. Calwater doesn’t have concern with using their land for flood mitigation as long as it does not impact their water quality or existing water wells. More studies and approvals would be required to move forward in this direction.
11. Calwater doesn’t see a problem with providing an asphalt trail along the existing maintenance road to provide park access from Chestnut Ave. Only concern they have is if a physical structure was built that would prohibit them from accessing their underground tanks for maintenance
12. Calwater recommends providing a written request for intended park improvements. This will help facilitate
communication between the City and Calwater.
13. Calwater isn’t aware of any future development plans on their property.
14. Makena Wong and Richard Mullane preferred Alternative #1
15. The connection from the trail on North Canal St to the park is currently difficult. Consider looking at improving the
connection across Orange Ave.
Process and Next Steps
16. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.
The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 26, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg5.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Submitted by:
Zach Katz
Zach Katz
CALA
cc: All attendees
Devin Stenhouse, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Jacob Gilchrist, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Barbara Butler, [email protected]
Elaine Breeze (EB), Summerhill Apartment Communities, [email protected] Rob Seeley, Cal Water [email protected]
Sabrina Alonso, PMA/Lane Partners, [email protected]
Glen Ceridono, SyRes Properties, [email protected] Angelika Abellana, Town of Colma, [email protected] Michael Johnson, Overton Moore Properties (1477 Huntington), [email protected] John Skerry, Kaiser Permanente, [email protected]
Len Materman, County Flood and Sea Level Rise (OneShoreline), [email protected] Ann Mottola, San Bruno, [email protected]
Danielle Brewer, San Bruno, [email protected]
Attachments: Survey Link, one page
Presentation materials, 27 pages
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
October 29, 2021 Sustain
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: October 20, 2021
Time: 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
South San Francisco Unified School District
Bill Savidge, [email protected]
Daina Lujan, [email protected]
Wazi Chowdhurry, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Zach Katz, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholders an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plan alternatives.
The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.
Item Action / Due Date
School District Comments
1. Providing more nature into the centennial trail corridor would be beneficial to the schools
2. The outdoor classroom is very appealing and exciting.
3. The access shown to the tennis courts would provide a good bike connection to the school.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg6.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
4. The connection at the end of the football stadium is a is harder to get to for students. This connection could benefit from bike parking which the school would be in charge of providing within the grounds to encourage use.
5. The district is currently updating their master plan with a focus on school security.
a. The district and City along with their respective design teams should have a meeting to confirm access to school sites and discuss the district’s goals and the City’s
development goals.
District to set up a
meeting between
City and District
6. Community gardens adjacent to the schools would be of interest to the school district.
7. More trail lighting could improve student safety for those that use the trail early in the morning or after school events.
Process and Next Steps
Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group.
Survey links are attached to the meeting summary. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.
The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.
Submitted by:
Zach Katz
Zach Katz
CALA
cc: All attendees
Adena Friedman, [email protected]
Shawnterra Moore, [email protected]
David Hartman, [email protected]
Nadia Rodriguez, [email protected]
Alex Kolcek, [email protected]
Henryk De-Rewenda, [email protected]
Ethan Mizzi, [email protected]
Edith Arias, [email protected]
Dora Alvarez, [email protected]
Elvira Valencia, [email protected]
Martha Guzman, [email protected]
Mary Ann Cruz, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg6.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Petra Lopez, [email protected]
Andy Montenegro, [email protected]
Norma Hernandez, [email protected]
Christopher Espiritu, [email protected]
Marie Patea, [email protected]
Kelli Jo Cullinan, [email protected]
Herbert Rahm, [email protected]
Bill Lock, [email protected]
Ruth DeNardi, [email protected]
Attachments: Survey Link, one page
Meeting Presentation, 20 pages
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
October 29, 2021 Sustain
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: October 21, 2021
Time: 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale Jr., [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Bill Stridbeck, [email protected]
Aquatic Group
Khai Vu, [email protected]
Rosalind Stewart, [email protected]
Skateboarders
Mike Manidis, [email protected]
Ryan Motzek, [email protected]
Derick Stevenson, [email protected]
Patrick Beaudouin
Softball/Baseball Leagues
Juan Bustos, [email protected]
Woody Rael, [email protected]
Soccer
Brian Mansell, [email protected]
Patty Gomez, [email protected]
Pickleball
Armando Leigh, [email protected]
Kurtis Wong, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg7.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholders an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plan alternatives.
The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.
Item Action / Due Date
General
1. Stakeholders like the diversity of amenities proposed and appreciate that they serve users of all generations and ages.
Pickleball Group
2. Thinks it would be good to have each Centennial trail opportunity area be themed such as “Health and Wellness”, “Science and Tech”, etc.
3. Crossing Chestnut from the trail is currently difficult. The City confirmed upgrades to the crossing are currently under
construction.
4. Pickleball has seen a large growth of users (multigenerational) over the past 5-10 years.
5. Appreciate incorporating dedicated pickleball courts into the OMP design but 2-3 courts are probably not enough for the expected users.
6. Consider providing at a minimum 6 courts which is how many courts Leo Ryan Park in Foster City currently has.
Skateboarder Group
7. The stakeholder groups likes and appreciate all of the proposed skateparks and skate spaces, although the
concept having skateable elements that feel inclusive within the overall park and Centennial Trail (“skate spaces”) are more desirable than a fenced-off area.
a. The current trend is moving away from larger skate parks to permanent simplistic skate spaces that mimic
urban/street infrastructure that skateboarders generally gravitate towards.
8. The idea of blending in permanent multi-purpose skate space elements into the landscape/design of the park or trail is very desirable.
9. Lighting at any new skate feature is desired and encouraged.
Aquatic Group
10. The City encouraged group to attend the special city council session regarding the OMP pool on Tuesday, the 26th.
City to provide
details to aquatics
group.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg7.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item Action / Due Date
11. Likes the idea of a community garden and greenhouse and encourages providing raised beds in the garden.
Soccer Group
12. The preferred OMP alternative is #2.
13. Having more fields will alleviate scheduling conflicts of the multi-purposes fields under construction.
14. It’s preferred that all new fields are lit since there is not much daylight time for practice after normal work hours.
15. Group is in support of skateparks around the City for youth.
Next Steps
16. Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group. Survey links are attached to the meeting summary.
17. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.
The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.
Submitted by:
Zach Katz
Zach Katz
CALA
cc: All attendees
Adena Friedman, [email protected]
Marcus Nava, [email protected]
Brian Noce, [email protected]
Ruth DeNardi, [email protected]
Jaxon Lazzari, [email protected]
Chris Kraft, [email protected]
Kay McGough, [email protected]
Mike Pizzo, [email protected]
Jim Elder, [email protected]
Troy & Dana Hartman, [email protected]
Amanda Leigh, [email protected]
Mike Redondo, [email protected]
Anthony Dizon-Barron, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg7.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Stanley Chi, [email protected]
Alex Khoo, [email protected]
Lily Oweyeung, [email protected]
Joanne Calvert, [email protected]
Jeannette Holt, [email protected]
Chitra Dhingra, [email protected]
Diane Zellmer, [email protected]
Ron Malone, [email protected]
Parker Holloway, [email protected]
Attachments: Survey Link, one page
Meeting Presentation, 20 pages
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
October 20, 2021 Sustain
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
Date: October 20, 2021
Time: 10:00 – 11:00 am
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
Brandon Cutajar, [email protected]
Kelli Jo Cullinan, [email protected]
Kari Jung, [email protected]
Zachary Kust, [email protected]
Catherine Misener, [email protected]
Kimberly Morrison, [email protected]
Laura Armanino, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Brian Noce, [email protected]
Erin O'Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Ercie Santos, [email protected]
Devin Stenhouse, [email protected]
Brian Crume, [email protected]
Veronica Ortiz, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give City staff an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plan alternatives. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.
Item
Centennial Trail Comments
1. Make sure that trail elements are accessible to all ages and abilities, i.e. Fitness equipment similar to Sunset Blvd and elevated community garden plots.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
October 21, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg8.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item
2. The City is exploring bringing recycled water down to Centennial Trail.
3. It’s difficult to maneuver maintenance trucks on the trail. Consider locating trash enclosures/trash receptacles in close proximity to the trail for ease of maintenance.
4. The City would like to run the alternatives by the fire department to confirm what type of access and if a turnaround is required.
5. Alternative #1 for opportunity area 2 is the preference for high school and City classes.
6. Consider interchangeable interpretive/educational signage along the entire span of the trail for educational purposes.
7. There have been discussions about continuing Sequoia lane through the trail and across the creek. Consider adjusting the location of the community garden and other potential amenities east so they don’t get displaced by Sequoia Lane.
8. Restroom locations should be considered as more amenities are being implemented. Ideally there are restroom every ½ a mile for users.
9. Opportunity area #3 feels more open and potentially has more eyes on it. Consider locating the skatepark and pump track in this area if space permits.
10. There are graffiti issues closer to San Bruno Station. Consider adding cameras and providing more connections to allow for more access to the site.
11. The City is contemplating if a bikeshare/scooter program would be beneficial along the trail.
12. Consider showing the PG&E easement on the plans.
Orange Park Comments
13. Childcare services require storage space. The City is currently looking into storage for childcare services at the Orange Park Library as the primary location
14. Picnic areas and shelters get high use so they should not be removed.
15. It’s preferred to keep any maintenance facility separate from public spaces/amenities.
16. Picnic areas are generally fully booked. Look at adding more picnic areas where space allows.
17. The market/event walk is a flexible space and can utilized for picnic area.
18. Consider showing U-9 soccer field striping on the un-programmed turf area. This area will most likely be utilized for soccer.
19. Cultural arts prefers alternative #1 and would like to see the artist studio remain.
There currently is demand for the artist studios.
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
October 21, 2021
21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg8.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Item
20. The currently proposed alternatives are preliminary. Amenities and locations can be mixed and matched depending on the outreach data received throughout the process.
21. A further discussion item is the possibility of using a portion of the Cal Water property connecting the community garden to the Mazzanti property.
Next Steps
22. Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group. Survey links are attached to the meeting summary. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.
The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.
Submitted by:
Zach Katz
Zach Katz
CALA
cc: All attendees
Attachments: Survey Link, one page
APPENDIX B
Survey Results Summaries
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 14 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
September 3, 2021
Round 1 Public Outreach Data Summary
Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update
Number of survey responses
• Public responses = 320, City staff responses = 2
Most popular amenities based on sticker votes
1. Colma Creek restoration
2. New indoor pool
3. Outdoor theatre
4. Farmer’s market shelter
5. All abilities play area
6. Community garden
7. Natural play features
8. Fitness station
9. Unprogrammed turf areas
10. Additional picnic areas
Most popular amenities based on survey results
1. Farmer’s market shelter
2. Skate park
3. Outdoor theatre
4. New indoor pool
5. Colma Creek restoration
6. Fitness station
7. All abilities play area
8. Natural play features
9. Community garden
10. Additional picnic areas
Most popular amenities and improvements based on hand written notes during events • New pool
• All abilities playground
• More events
• Art studio
• Upgrade site furnishings
Round 1 Public Outreach Data Summary
Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update
September 3, 2021
21021_OutreachDataSummary_Round1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Summary of survey results
• Most people live a 10-20 minute walk away from the park while the second most people live less than a 10 minute walk
• Roughly 40% of people visit OMP once a week. Roughly 25% of people visit the park once a month and roughly 20% of people visit once a day.
• What people like most about park: Skatepark, playground, pool building, picnic/bbq areas, sport fields and walkways
• How the park can be improved: Skatepark, basketball courts, picnic area, swimming pool, maintenance, signage, playground, all abilities playground • Events people would like at the park: Music/concerts, skateboarding events, movies, Day at the Park,
www.callanderassociates.com
BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 14 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
November 15, 2021
Round 2 Public Outreach Data Summary
Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update
Number of Survey Responses = 51
Demographics
• Roughly 70% of responders have not attended previous meetings related to the master planning process.
• 40% of responders live more than a 20 minutes’ walk away from the park, 30% live 10-20 minutes away, and 26% live less than 10 minutes away.
• 32% visit the park once a month, 38% visit once a week, 22% visit once a day, and 8% visit once a year.
General Comments
• The addition of restrooms was suggested.
• Design the park to be inclusive for all ages.
Area A
• The skate park and pump track are preferred because they provide more diverse recreation options in the park. It was suggested that there are already enough fields in the park.
• The skatepark and pump track area should have shade.
• Although not the preferred option, multi-purpose fields are desired. • Picnic spaces are desired.
Area B
• The most popular amenities are the restoration of Colma Creek, the market/event walk, and the fitness court.
• The outdoor theatre is appealing to community members. • More pickleball courts was suggested.
Uses That Could Happen at Either Site
• There is significant interest in having a bike pump track and skate park. However, there is not a strong preference for where those uses are located (either at Orange Park or along Centennial Trail).
• There is a strong preference for locating soccer fields at Orange Park instead of Centennial Trail. Most people responded that if a soccer field was constructed along Centennial Trail at Opportunity Area 1, they would either need to park nearby or else they wouldn't know how to access it.
APPENDIX C
Design Alternatives
APPENDIX D
Preferred Concept Plan
TENNIS DRIVE W. ORANGE AVE.
MEMORIAL DR.
CHESTNUT AVE.
COLMA CREEK
ANTOINETTE LN.
COMMERCIAL AVE.
0 40’ 80’ 160’
(N)ENTRY PLAZA, TYP.
MARKET/EVENT WALK
ELEVATION, REFER TO
FIGURE 13 ON PAGE 28
(N)COLMA CREEK
RESTORATION
CONCESSION STAND/
RESTROOM
CONCEPTUAL
PERSPECTIVE OF COLMA
CREEK RESTORATION,
REFER TO FIGURE 12 ON
PAGE 26
(E)RECREATION
BUILDING
(E)PARKING
PERSPECTIVE OF SHADE
SHELTER, REFER TO
FIGURE 10 ON PAGE 23
(N)MARKET/
EVENT WALK
(N)ALL ABILITIES
PLAYGROUND
(E)PARKING
(E)PARKING
(N)PARKING
(N)RESTROOM / CONCESSION
BUILDING
(N)CENTRAL GATHERING
NODE / PLAZA
(N)CENTRAL GATHERING
NODE / PLAZA
(N)PICKLEBALL COURTS
(E)BOCCE COURTS
(N)PICNIC AREA
(N)SHADE SHELTER
& PICNIC AREA
(N)PEDESTRIAN PATH
(N)BLEACHERS
(N)PEDESTRIAN
PATH
(N)GATHERING NODE /
PICNIC AREA
(N)PARKING
(N)SWIM CENTER
(N)VETERAN’S
MEMORIAL
(N)SHADE SHELTER/
OUTDOOR THEATER
(N)UNPROGRAMMED
TURF AREA
(E)BASKETBALL COURTS
& RESTROOM
(E)OPEN TURF
AREA
(E)COMMUNITY
GARDENS
(N)RENOVATED
PLAYGROUND
(N)CREEK WALK /
NATURAL PLAY
(N)RENOVATED
PICNIC SHELTER
(N)RENOVATED RESTROOM
(E)CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL
ATHLETIC FIELDS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
(E)TENNIS COURTS
(N)ARTIST STUDIOS /
MAKER SPACES
(N)PARK MAINTENANCE
FACILITIES
(E)SCULPTURE GARDEN
PREFERRED CONCEPT PLAN
(N)YOUTH
MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS
(N)PICNIC AREA
0.1 MILE TO
CIVIC CAMPUS
F10
F12
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
OCTOBER 6, 2022
PARK
APPENDIX E
Cost Estimates
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Estimated Cost for Swim Center (Provided by
City)
Allow LS $49,000,000.00 $49,000,000.
B. Veteran's Memorial Allow LS 510,110.00 $ 510,110.00 $ C. $ 49,510,110.00
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Concept Plan", dated "February 2023" The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 1
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST - AREA 1
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1 of 1
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up
1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8% 572,097.42 $ 572,097.42 $
2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $
3. Temporary fencing ALLOW LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
4. Traffic control ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
$ 652,100.00
B. Demolition
1. Clear and grub 37,055 SF 1.00 $ 37,055.00 $
2. Selective tree removal ALLOW LS 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $
3. Asphalt and base rock removal 19,230 SF 3.00 $ 57,690.00 $
5. Chainlink fence and gate removal 525 LF 8.00 $ 4,200.00 $
6. 4' Ornamental metal fence removal 150 LF 20.00 $ 3,000.00 $
7. Concrete and base rock removal 17,940 SF 5.00 $ 89,700.00 $
8. Natural turf removal 122,990 SF 0.35 $ 43,046.50 $
9. Play structure removal ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
10. Rubber surfacing removal 12,325 SF 1.00 $ 12,325.00 $
11. Seatwall removal 190 LF 50.00 $ 9,500.00 $
12. Irrigation equipment removal ALLOW LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
13. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ $ 356,520.00
C. Earthwork and Grading
1. Rough grading, 6" avg. depth 4,090 CY $ 80.00 $ 327,200.00
2. Play area mounding, 10' avg. depth 4,500 CY $ 80.00 $ 360,000.00
3. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
4. Utility point of connections, components
and pipelines
ALLOW LS $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00
5. Biotreatment areas (4% of impervious
pavement)
4,955 SF $ 45.00 $ 222,975.00
6. Adjust utilities to grade ALLOW LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 1,230,180.00
D. Site Construction
1. Asphalt pavement 6,275 SF 8.00 $ 50,200.00 $
2. Parking lot striping ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $
3. Parking lot slurry seal 53,115 SF 1.00 $ 53,115.00 $
4. Play area curb 1,905 LF 70.00 $ 133,350.00 $
5. Concrete curb and gutter 1,370 LF 70.00 $ 95,900.00 $
6. Concrete pavement 51,125 SF 16.00 $ 818,000.00 $
7. Accent concrete pavement 4,600 SF 24.00 $ 110,400.00 $
8. Decomposed granite pavement 8,760 SF 10.00 $ 87,600.00 $
9. Concrete seatwall 425 LF 350.00 $ 148,750.00 $
10. Pickle ball chainlink fence, 10' height 905 LF 140.00 $ 126,700.00 $
11. Pickle ball chainlink gate 6 EA 3,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $
12. Large shade structure 1 EA 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ Final Master Plan - Area 2
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1 of 4
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Final Master Plan - Area 2
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
13. Market walk shade structure 7 EA 30,000.00 $ 210,000.00 $
14. Basketball court resurfacing 2 EA 15,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $
15. Small shade structure 1 EA 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $
16. Tot lot play equipment 1 EA 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $
17. Youth play equipment 1 EA 600,000.00 $ 600,000.00 $
18. Pickle ball courts 6 EA 50,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $
19. Rubber surfacing 29,300 SF 35.00 $ 1,025,500.00 $
$ 4,307,520.00
E. Site Furnishings
1. Picnic table 18 EA 1,600.00 $ 28,800.00 $
2. Trash receptacle 9 EA 1,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $
3. Drinking fountain 2 EA 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
4. Bicycle rack 15 EA 1,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $
5. Barbecue 2 EA 750.00 $ 1,500.00 $
6. Wayfinding/park rules signage 5 EA 2,500.00 $ 12,500.00 $
7. Area sign 6 EA 4,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $
8. Bench 17 EA 1,100.00 $ 18,700.00 $
9. Mutt mitt dispenser 3 EA 650.00 $ 1,950.00 $
10. Permanent Bollard 7 EA 600.00 $ 4,200.00 $
11. Removable bollard 3 EA 900.00 $ 2,700.00 $
12. Youth soccer goal 4 EA 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $
$ 138,350.00
F. Irrigation
1. Backflow preventer 2 EA 8,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $
2. Water meter 1 EA 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
3. Point of connection - water 2 EA 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $
4. Electrical point of connection 2 EA 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
5. Controller assembly 2 EA 12,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $
6. Mainline piping including, gate valve, quick
coupling, master valve and flow sensor
1,585 LF 20.00 $ 31,700.00 $
7. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valves)
34,235 SF 3.00 $ 102,705.00 $
8. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 186 EA 100.00 $ 18,600.00 $
9. Irrigation system , turf areas ( including
remote control valves)
77,300 SF 1.75 $ 135,275.00 $
$ 353,280.00
G. Soil Preparation
1. Soil preparation and fine grading 111,535 SF 0.75 $ 83,651.25 $ $ 83,650.00
H. Planting
1. Trees, 24" box 60 EA 450.00 $ 27,000.00 $
2. Trees, 15 gal. 33 EA 225.00 $ 7,425.00 $
3. Shrubs and grasses 13,695 SF 5.00 $ 68,475.00 $
4. Groundcover 20,540 SF 3.00 $ 61,620.00 $
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 2 of 4
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Final Master Plan - Area 2
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
5. Mulch 34,235 SF 1.00 $ 34,235.00 $
6. Turf from sod 77,300 SF 0.75 $ 57,975.00 $
7. Palm tree, 15' BTH 4 EA 7,500.00 $ 30,000.00 $
$ 286,730.00
I. Landscape Maintenance
1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $
$ 15,000.00
J. Lighting and Electrical
1. Electrical service 1 EA 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
2. Pathway, parking, and landscape lights ALLOW LS 275,000.00 $ 275,000.00 $ $ 300,000.00
K. Area Renovations
1. Renovate existing areas of the park that are
not improved as part of the master plan
100,105 SF 35.00 $ 3,503,675.00 $
$ 3,503,680.00
L. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 11,227,010.00
M. Contingencies
1. Design contingency ALLOW 20% 2,245,402.00 $ 2,245,402.00 $
2. Bid contingency ALLOW 10% 1,122,701.00 $ 1,122,701.00 $
3. Construction contingency ALLOW 10% 1,122,701.00 $ 1,122,701.00 $
4. Inflation ALLOW 6% 673,620.60 $ 673,620.60 $
$ 5,164,420.00
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 3 of 4
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Final Master Plan - Area 2
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
N. Total Estimated Construction Costs &
Contingencies
$ 16,391,430.00
O. Project Soft Costs
1. Construction Management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close-out)
Allow 8.0% 1,311,310.00 $ 1,311,310.00 $
2. Studies (topo, Geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
Allow 12% 1,966,970.00 $ 1,966,970.00 $
3. Services (Special inspections & testing) Allow 1% 163,910.00 $ 163,910.00 $
4. Permits/Fees (Calwater, PG&E, Building/Plan
Review, other)
Allow 3% 491,740.00 $ 491,740.00 $
5. Preliminary design and public outreach
6. Design development Allow 2.5% 409,790.00 $ 409,790.00 $
7. Construction documents Allow 10% 1,639,140.00 $ 1,639,140.00 $
8. Construction administration Allow 2.5% 409,790.00 $ 409,790.00 $
9. Miscellaneous Allow 1.0% 163,910.00 $ 163,910.00 $
$ 6,556,560
P. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST - AREA 2 $ 22,947,990.00 The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Concept Plan", dated "February 2023" (completed with master plan)
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 4 of 4
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up
1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8% 562,520.20 $ 562,520.20 $
2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $
3. Temporary fencing ALLOW LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
4. Traffic control ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
$ 642,520.00
B. Demolition
1. Clear and grub 39,790 SF 1.00 $ 39,790.00 $
2. Selective tree removal ALLOW LS 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $
3. Asphalt and base rock removal 23,940 SF 3.00 $ 71,820.00 $
4. Chainlink fence and gate removal 1,880 LF 8.00 $ 15,040.00 $
5. Concrete and base rock removal 1,010 SF 5.00 $ 5,050.00 $
6. Bridge removal 2 EA 20,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $
7. Colma creek channel removal 58,890 SF 20.00 $ 1,177,800.00 $
8. Irrigation equipment removal ALLOW LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
9. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ $ 1,434,500.00
C. Earthwork and Grading
1. Rough grading + soil offhaul ALLOW LS $ 1,500,000.00 $ 1,500,000.00
2. Colma creek restoration ALLOW LS $ 1,000,000.00 $ 1,000,000.00
3. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
4. Drain line 380 LF $ 80.00 $ 30,400.00
5. Catch basin 2 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00
6. Biotreatment areas (4% of impervious
pavement
610 SF $ 45.00 $ 27,450.00
7. Adjust utilities to grade ALLOW LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 2,634,850.00
D. Site Construction
1. Concrete curb and gutter 95 LF 70.00 $ 6,650.00 $
2. Concrete pavement 14,680 SF 16.00 $ 234,880.00 $
3. Concrete retaining wall 260 LF 250.00 $ 65,000.00 $
4. Concrete seatwall 260 LF 350.00 $ 91,000.00 $
5. Accent concrete pavement 500 SF 24.00 $ 12,000.00 $
6. Colma creek bridge, Type 1 ALLOW LS 1,000,000.00 $ 1,000,000.00 $
7. Colma creek bridge, Type 2 ALLOW LS 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ $ 1,909,530.00
E. Site Furnishings
1. Trash receptacle 3 EA 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $
3. Wayfinding/park rules signage 6 EA 2,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $
4. Area sign 2 EA 4,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $
5. Bench 5 EA 1,100.00 $ 5,500.00 $
7. Permanent Bollard 10 EA 600.00 $ 6,000.00 $
8. Removable bollard 2 EA 900.00 $ 1,800.00 $
9. Boulders (medium to large) 100 EA 1,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ $ 139,300.00
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 3
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1 of 3
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 3
F. Irrigation
1. Backflow preventer 1 EA 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $
2. Point of connection - water 1 EA 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $
3. Water meter 1 EA 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
4. Electrical point of connection 1 EA 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $
5. Controller assembly 1 EA 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $
6. Mainline piping including gate valve, quick
coupling, master valve and flow sensor
880 LF 20.00 $ 17,600.00 $
7. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valve)
54,470 SF 3.00 $ 163,410.00 $
8. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 160 EA 100.00 $ 16,000.00 $ $ 234,510.00
G. Soil Preparation
1. Soil preparation and fine grading 54,470 SF 0.75 $ 40,852.50 $ $ 40,850.00
H. Planting
1. Trees, 24" box 60 EA 450.00 $ 27,000.00 $
2. Trees, 15 gal. 20 EA 225.00 $ 4,500.00 $
3. Shrubs and grasses 21,790 SF 5.00 $ 108,950.00 $
4. Groundcover 32,680 SF 3.00 $ 98,040.00 $
5. Mulch 54,470 SF 1.00 $ 54,470.00 $
$ 292,960.00
I. Landscape Maintenance
1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $
$ 15,000.00
J. Lighting and Electrical
1. Electrical service 1 EA 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
2. Pathway, parking, and landscape lights ALLOW LS 225,000.00 $ 225,000.00 $ $ 250,000.00
K. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 7,594,020.00
L. Contingencies
1. Design contingency ALLOW 20% 1,518,804.00 $ 1,518,804.00 $
2. Bid contingency ALLOW 10% 759,402.00 $ 759,402.00 $
3. Construction contingency ALLOW 10% 759,402.00 $ 759,402.00 $
4. Inflation ALLOW 6% 455,641.20 $ 455,641.20 $
$ 3,493,250.00
M. Total Estimated Construction Costs &
Contingencies
$ 11,087,270.00
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 2 of 3
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 3
N. Project Soft Costs
1. Construction Management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close-out)
Allow 8.0% 886,980.00 $ 886,980.00 $
2. Studies (topo, Geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
Allow 12% 1,330,470.00 $ 1,330,470.00 $
3. Services (Special inspections & testing) Allow 1% 110,870.00 $ 110,870.00 $
4. Permits/Fees (Calwater, PG&E, Building/Plan
Review, other)
Allow 3% 332,620.00 $ 332,620.00 $
5. Preliminary design and public outreach
6. Design development Allow 2.5% 277,180.00 $ 277,180.00 $
7. Construction documents Allow 10% 1,108,730.00 $ 1,108,730.00 $
8. Construction administration Allow 2.5% 277,180.00 $ 277,180.00 $
9. Miscellaneous Allow 1.0% 110,870.00 $ 110,870.00 $
$ 4,434,900
O. $ 15,522,170.00
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST - AREA 3
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Concept Plan", dated "February 2023" (completed with master plan)
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 3 of 3
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up
1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8% 167,813.64 $ 167,813.64 $
2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $
3. Temporary fencing ALLOW LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
4. Traffic control ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
$ 247,810.00
B. Demolition
1. Clear and grub 47,545 SF 1.00 $ 47,545.00 $
2. Selective tree removal ALLOW LS 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
3. Concrete and base rock removal 7,925 SF 5.00 $ 39,625.00 $
4. Play structure removal ALLOW LS 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
5. Rubber surfacing removal 3,670 SF 2.00 $ 7,340.00 $
6. Area signage removal 8 EA 500.00 $ 4,000.00 $
7. Picnic shelter furnishing removal (picnic
table, trash receptacles & bbq)
ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
8. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ $ 168,510.00
C. Earthwork and Grading
1. Rough grading, 6" avg. depth 1,095 CY $ 80.00 $ 87,600.00
2. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
3. Utility point of connections, components,
and pipelines
ALLOW LS $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00
4. Bioretention areas (4% of impervious
pavement)
1,380 SF $ 45.00 $ 62,100.00
5. Adjust utilities to grade ALLOW LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 319,700.00
D. Site Construction
1. Asphalt pavement 17,185 SF 8.00 $ 137,480.00 $
2. Play area curb 240 LF 70.00 $ 16,800.00 $
3. Concrete pavement 10,190 SF 16.00 $ 163,040.00 $
4. Accent concrete pavement 3,445 SF 24.00 $ 82,680.00 $
5. Rubber surfacing 3,670 SF 35.00 $ 128,450.00 $
6. Colma creek chainlink fence, 6' high 345 LF 100.00 $ 34,500.00 $
7. Youth play equipment 1 EA 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $
8. Picnic shelter renovation ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $
9. Restroom renovation ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $
10. Artist facility 1 EA 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $
$ 1,162,950.00
E. Site Furnishings
1. Picnic table (for picnic shelter only) 13 EA 1,600.00 $ 20,800.00 $
2. Trash receptacle (for picnic shelter only) 9 EA 1,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $
3. Park entry sign 1 EA 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
4. Wayfinding/park rules signage 3 EA 2,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $
5. Area sign 8 EA 4,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 4
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1 of 3
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 4
6. Mutt mitt dispenser 3 EA 650.00 $ 1,950.00 $
$ 91,250.00
F. Irrigation
1. Irrigation modifications 2,060 SF 10.00 $ 20,600.00 $
2. Backflow preventer 1 EA 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $
3. Water meter 1 EA 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
4. Point of connection - water 1 EA 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $
5. Electrical point of connection 1 EA 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $
6. Controller assembly 1 EA 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $
7. Mainline piping including gate valve, quick
coupling, master valve and flow sensor
745 LF 45.00 $ 33,525.00 $
8. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valves)
18,010 SF 3.00 $ 54,030.00 $
9. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 52 EA 100.00 $ 5,200.00 $ $ 150,860.00
G. Soil Preparation
1. Soil preparation and fine grading 18,010 SF 0.75 $ 13,507.50 $ $ 13,510.00
H. Planting
1. Trees, 24" box 16 EA 450.00 $ 7,200.00 $
2. Trees, 15 gal. 10 EA 225.00 $ 2,250.00 $
3. Shrubs and grasses 7,204 SF 5.00 $ 36,020.00 $
4. Groundcover 10,806 SF 3.00 $ 32,418.00 $
5. Mulch 18,010 SF 1.00 $ 18,010.00 $
$ 95,900.00
I. Landscape Maintenance
1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $
$ 15,000.00
J. Area Renovations
1. Renovate existing areas of the park that are
not improved as part of the master plan
234,170 SF 20.00 $ 4,683,400.00 $
$ 4,683,400.00
K. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 6,948,890.00
L. Contingencies
1. Design contingency ALLOW 20% 1,389,778.00 $ 1,389,778.00 $
2. Bid contingency ALLOW 10% 694,889.00 $ 694,889.00 $
3. Construction contingency ALLOW 10% 694,889.00 $ 694,889.00 $
4. Inflation ALLOW 6% 416,933.40 $ 416,933.40 $
$ 3,196,490.00
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 2 of 3
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 4
M. Total Estimated Construction Costs &
Contingencies
$ 10,145,380.00
N. Project Soft Costs
1. Construction Management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close-out)
Allow 8.0% 811,630.00 $ 811,630.00 $
2. Studies (topo, Geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
Allow 12% 1,217,450.00 $ 1,217,450.00 $
3. Services (Special inspections & testing) Allow 1% 101,450.00 $ 101,450.00 $
4. Permits/Fees (Calwater, PG&E, Building/Plan
Review, other)
Allow 3% 304,360.00 $ 304,360.00 $
5. Preliminary design and public outreach
6. Design development Allow 2.5% 253,630.00 $ 253,630.00 $
7. Construction documents Allow 10% 1,014,540.00 $ 1,014,540.00 $
8. Construction administration Allow 2.5% 253,630.00 $ 253,630.00 $
9. Miscellaneous Allow 1.0% 101,450.00 $ 101,450.00 $
$ 4,058,140
O. $ 14,203,520.00
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST - AREA 4
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Concept Plan", dated "February 2023" (completed with master plan)
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2019 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 3 of 3
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up
1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8% 448,155.80 $ 448,155.80 $
2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $
3. Temporary fencing ALLOW LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
4. Traffic control ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
$ 528,160.00
B. Demolition
1. Clear and grub 145,355 SF 1.00 $ 145,355.00 $
2. Selective tree removal ALLOW LS 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
3. Asphalt and base rock removal 68,465 SF 3.00 $ 205,395.00 $
4. Chainlink fence and gate removal 2,690 LF 10.00 $ 26,900.00 $
5. Gravel removal 22,425 SF 2.00 $ 44,850.00 $
6. Artist studios removal ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $
7. Building removal ALLOW LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
8. Abandoned restroom building ALLOW LS 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
9. Irrigation equipment removal ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
10. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ $ 612,500.00
C. Earthwork and Grading
1. Rough grading, 6" avg. depth 4,375 CY $ 80.00 $ 350,000.00
2. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
3. Utility point of connections, components
and pipelines
ALLOW LS $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00
4. Biotreatment areas (4% of impervious
pavement)
2,985 SF $ 45.00 $ 134,325.00
5. Soil mitigation cap ALLOW LS $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00
6. Adjust utilities to grade ALLOW LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 1,304,330.00
D. Site Construction
1. Asphalt pavement 27,390 SF 8.00 $ 219,120.00 $
2. Parking lot striping ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
3. Concrete curb and gutter 280 LF 70.00 $ 19,600.00 $
4. Concrete pavement 39,885 SF 16.00 $ 638,160.00 $
5. Accent concrete pavement 7,295 SF 24.00 $ 175,080.00 $
6. Concrete seatwall 125 LF 350.00 $ 43,750.00 $
7. Colma creek chainlink fence, 6' high 1,200 LF 100.00 $ 120,000.00 $
8. Baseball chainlink fence, 10' high 1,230 LF 150.00 $ 184,500.00 $
9. Dugout 4 EA 20,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $
10. Backstop 2 EA 60,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $
11. Infield mix 13,195 SF 8.00 $ 105,560.00 $
12. Large shade structure 1 EA 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $
13. Restroom/concessions 1 EA 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ $ 2,380,770.00
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 5
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2022 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1 of 4
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 5
E. Site Furnishings
1. Picnic table 16 EA 1,600.00 $ 25,600.00 $
2. Trash receptacle 10 EA 1,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
3. Drinking fountain 3 EA 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $
4. Bicycle rack 5 EA 1,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $
5. Barbecue 2 EA 750.00 $ 1,500.00 $
6. Wayfinding/park rules signage 4 EA 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $
7. Area sign 4 EA 4,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $
8. Bench 4 EA 1,100.00 $ 4,400.00 $
9. Mutt mitt dispenser 2 EA 650.00 $ 1,300.00 $
10. Bleachers 4 EA 20,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $
11. Permanent Bollard 5 EA 600.00 $ 3,000.00 $
12. Removable bollard 2 EA 900.00 $ 1,800.00 $
13. Youth soccer goal 2 EA 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $
14. Foul pole 4 EA 7,000.00 $ 28,000.00 $
15. Baseball bases 8 EA 1,500.00 $ 12,000.00 $
16. Dugout bench 4 EA 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $
17. Storage unit 1 EA 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
$ 248,600.00
F. Irrigation
1. Backflow preventer 1 EA 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $
2. Point of connection - water 1 EA 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $
3. Water meter 1 EA 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
4. Electrical point of connection 1 EA 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $
4. Controller assembly 1 EA 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $
5. Mainline piping including gate valve, quick
coupling, master valve and flow sensor
1,230 LF 20.00 $ 24,600.00 $
6. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valve)
26,170 SF 3.00 $ 78,510.00 $
7. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 156 EA 100.00 $ 15,600.00 $
8. Irrigation system , turf areas (including
remote control valve)
114,860 SF 1.75 $ 201,005.00 $
$ 357,220.00
G. Soil Preparation
1. Soil preparation and fine grading 141,030 SF 0.75 $ 105,772.50 $ $ 105,770.00
H. Planting
1. Trees, 24" box 65 EA 450.00 $ 29,250.00 $
2. Trees, 15 gal. 30 EA 225.00 $ 6,750.00 $
3. Shrubs and grasses 10,470 SF 5.00 $ 52,350.00 $
4. Groundcover 15,700 SF 3.00 $ 47,100.00 $
5. Mulch 26,170 SF 1.00 $ 26,170.00 $
6. Turf from sod 114,860 SF 0.75 $ 86,145.00 $
$ 247,770.00
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2022 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 2 of 4
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 5
I. Landscape Maintenance
1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $
$ 15,000.00
J. Lighting and Electrical
1. Electrical service 1 EA 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $
2. Pathway, parking, and landscape lights ALLOW LS 225,000.00 $ 225,000.00 $ $ 250,000.00
K. Area Renovations
1. Renovate existing areas of the park that are
not improved as part of the master plan
8,445 SF 35.00 $ 295,575.00 $
$ 295,580.00
L. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 6,345,700.00
M. Contingencies
1. Design contingency ALLOW 20% 1,269,140.00 $ 1,269,140.00 $
2. Bid contingency ALLOW 10% 634,570.00 $ 634,570.00 $
3. Construction contingency ALLOW 10% 634,570.00 $ 634,570.00 $
4. Inflation ALLOW 6% 380,742.00 $ 380,742.00 $
$ 2,919,020.00
N. $ 9,264,720.00
O. Add Alternate
1. Deduct turf from sod 114,860 SF (0.60) $ (68,916.00) $
2. Deduct infield mix 13,195 SF (8.00) $ (105,560.00) $
3. Artificial turf 114,860 SF 14.00 $ 1,608,040.00 $
4. Muti-purpose field lighting 1 EA 450,000.00 $ 450,000.00 $
5. Multi-purpose field striping Allow LS 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $
6. Deduct soil mitigation cap Allow SF (400,000.00) $ (400,000.00) $ $ 1,498,560.00
P. Project Soft Costs
1. Construction Management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close-out)
Allow 8.0% 119,880.00 $ 119,880.00 $
2. Studies (topo, Geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
Allow 12% 179,830.00 $ 179,830.00 $
3. Services (Special inspections & testing) Allow 1% 14,990.00 $ 14,990.00 $
4. Permits/Fees (Calwater, PG&E, Building/Plan
Review, other)
Allow 3% 44,960.00 $ 44,960.00 $
5. Preliminary design and public outreach
6. Design development Allow 2.5% 231,620.00 $ 231,620.00 $
7. Construction documents Allow 10% 926,470.00 $ 926,470.00 $
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS & CONTINGENCIES
(completed with master plan)
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2022 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 3 of 4
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 2/09/2023
prepared by: DC
checked by: BF & ZK
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Orange Memorial Park
Final Master Plan - Area 5
8. Construction administration Allow 2.5% 231,620.00 $ 231,620.00 $
9. Miscellaneous Allow 1.0% 92,650.00 $ 92,650.00 $
$ 1,842,020.00
Q. $ 11,106,740.00
R. $ 12,451,589.00
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS- AREA 5 - NATURAL TURF
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Concept Plan", dated "February 2023" TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS- AREA 5 - SYNTHETIC TURF
21021_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2022 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 4 of 4
APPENDIX F
Park Materials Board
Acer rubrum ‘Red Sunset’
Red Sunset Red Maple
Myrica californica
Pacific Wax Myrtle
Lagerstroemia indica ‘Muskogee’
Muskogee Crape Myrtle
Magnolia x soulangeana
Saucer Magnolia
Eriobotrya deflexa
Bronze Loquat
Pistacia chinensis ‘Keith Davey’
Chinese Pistache
Platanus acerifolia ‘Columbia’
Columbia London Plane Tree
Tristania conferta
Brisbane Box
Quercus suber
Cork Oak
Tristania laurina ‘Elegant’
Elegant Water Gum
Quercus agrifolia
Coast Live Oak
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
PARK
TREES
PARK MATERIALS BOARD
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
PARK
Agave ‘Blue Flame’
Blue Flame Agave
Carex tumulicola
Berkeley Sedge
Cistus skanbergii
Pink Rockrose
Leucadendron ‘Safari Sunset’
Safari Conebush
Grevillea noellii
Noell Grevillea
Agave ‘Blue Glow’
Blue Glow Agave
Ceanothus griseus horizontalis
‘Yankee Point’
Yankee Point Ceanothus
Coprosma x kirkii
Creeping Mirror Plant
Erigeron karvinskianus
Mexican Daisy
Hesperaloe parviflora
Red Yucca
Bouteloua gracilis
Blonde Ambition Blue Grama Grass
Cistus salvifolius
Sageleaf Rockrose
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’
Bearberry Cotoneaster
Festuca glauca
Blue Fescue
Muhlenbergia rigens
Deer Grass
SHURBS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVERS
PARK MATERIALS BOARD
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
PARK
Limonium perezii
Sea Lavender
Yucca Filamentosa ‘Color Guard’
Adam’s Needle
Nandina domestica ‘Firepower’
Heavenly Bamboo ‘Firepower’
Phormium tenax
New Zealand Flax
Lantana montevidensis
Trailing Lantana
Prunus caroliniana
Carolina Cherry Laurel
Lavandula angustifolia
English Lavender
SHURBS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVERS
PARK MATERIALS BOARD
ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
PARK
PARK MATERIALS BOARD
SITE FURNISHINGS
Pedestrian Light Drinking Fountain - Black
Concrete seatwall
Trash Receptacle - Black
Bleacher
Bollard - Stainless Steel
Large Barbecue
Small Barbecue
Bench - Black Picnic Table - Black Bicycle Rack - Stainless Steel Pedestrian Bridge - Type 1 Pedestrian Bridge - Type 2 Shade Shelter Market Walk Shelter
APPENDIX G
Signage Program
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
IDENTITY
SENSE OF PLACE
SIGNAGE FAMILY - ENTRY SIGN
AREA SIGN WAYFINDING/ PARK RULES ENTRY SIGN
3’-6”
2’-0”
14’-10”
4’-0”
8’-0”
4’-4”
2’-6”
SIGNAGE FAMILY
MATERIALS: MATERIALS: MATERIALS:
Top: Corten steel, Aluminum
acrylic lettering
Bottom: Concrete,
inset logo
Top: Corten steel, acrylic lettering
Bottom: Concrete, inset lettering and logo