840 WEST ORANGE AVE. PRESCHOOL CONVERSION
WESTBOROUGH PRESCHOOL REMODEL / ADDITION
PROPOSAL FOR
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
AUGUST 11, 2023
DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
229 FLAMINGO ROAD
MILL VALLEY, CA. 94941
T. (415) 380-7914
F. (415) 380-7915
WWW.DORMANASSOCIATES.COM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. COVER LETTER
2. FIRM / TEAM MEMBERS
3. RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
4. FEE PROPOSAL
5. APPENDICES
A. KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL (ALL TEAM RESUMES)
B. SUB-CONSULTANT PROJECTS LIST
C. HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
1. DORMAN ASSOCIATES
2. SUB-CONSULTANTS
D. DORMAN ASSOCIATES DESIGN PROCESS & STRATEGY
1. COVER LETTER
August 11, 2023
Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
T: (415) 380-7914
F: (415) 380-7915
Mark Cate
Project Director, Kitchell CEM on behalf of the
City of South San Francisco
[email protected]
RE: Request for Proposal - Architectural Services for the 840 West Orange Avenue Preschool Conversion and Westborough Preschool Remodel / Addition
Dear Mark,
We are pleased to have the opportunity to submit our proposal to provide Architectural Planning, Programming, Design, Construction Documents, and Construction Administration Services for your review and consideration. As outlined in the following pages, we believe our firm possesses a unique combination of talent and experience to work with your team to create this new preschool at 840 West Orange Ave and expand the facilities at Westborough Preschool. We see the making of every child development center as an opportunity to contribute to the community at large, helping to create a nurturing, educational space for children, and we are confident that our firm meets the selection and evaluation criteria outlined in the Request for Proposal document provided.
Since designing our first childcare center in 2008, Dorman Associates, Inc. has become the preferred childcare architect in the Bay Area, endorsed by Cities, corporations, and childcare providers. Drawing from our background as the exclusive architect for new construction and adaptive reuse projects, and also assuming the role of childcare design architect for extensive mixed-use ventures, Dorman Associates maintains an unwavering commitment to adhering to project time lines and financial plans, thereby contributing to the timely delivery of projects to the community.
Located just north of San Francisco in Marin County, the Dorman Associates office is in close proximity to the job sites for this Project. Our team has designed childcare centers throughout the Bay Area, from Sacramento to San Jose, and we are versatile in working with a wide variety of local jurisdictions. Our firm was involved in the initial planning stages of two childcare centers in the city of South San Francisco, and although we didn’t have the opportunity to see those projects through to completion, that experience gave us a chance to better understand the City’s permitting process as well as their requirements for obtaining proper approvals.
The Dorman Associates team has extensive design experience with educators, allowing for a holistic approach to the design of Children’s Centers that integrates unique solutions from both a design and technical perspective, considering the needs of the client, key stakeholders, administrators, teachers, caregivers, parents, and children. Our process of programming a center moves beyond building requirements, and incorporates design features that will best match the client’s needs and teaching philosophy, and incorporates our knowledge of best practices in Early Childhood Education. This includes working with staff to sculpt classrooms that create activity and project areas within the rooms that are developmentally appropriate and challenging, yet flexible, to meet the changing needs of the children and teachers.
Our design goals for childcare centers are developed in collaboration with the client and aim to create central, community spaces for the children, families, and teachers. We are committed to developing engaging and inspiring learning environments that enhance the lives of the people who live in the community, offering an important sense of place and an inspiring resource for early childhood care.
Included in this proposal are relevant case studies that demonstrate Dorman Associates, Inc.’s approach to designing centers that directly respond to the design requirements of each user and each project’s constraints. These projects used the NAEYC recommended best practices in their design, and all of our projects have been licensed by the state of California.
Our breadth of experience ranges from Head Start centers serving the most vulnerable children in our communities, non-profit organizations like the YMCA that provide care for thousands of youth, to major corporations, including Google and other Bay Area tech companies, that offer childcare as a work/life balancing benefit to their employees.
In our non-profit projects that are limited by budget, we use the minimum licensing standards, however our firm recently collaborated with the Stanford University Work Life Department Child Care team to review NAEYC standards and create a prototypical basis of design for future Stanford Centers.
We hope that the following pages will provide you with a detailed understanding of how we approach supportive community environments and how we can make your project a successful and wonderful place for children, their families, and the community at large. Our team is ready to proceed immediately if given the opportunity to work with you on this project.
Sincerely,
Chris Dorman, AIA
Principal
Dorman Associates, Inc.
[email protected]
http://www.dormanassociates.com
2. FIRM / TEAM MEMBERS
FIRM / TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS & ROLES
CHRIS DORMAN
MARY PETERSON
AVA FARAB
KYRA SIMON
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PRESCHOOL CONVERSION
& REMODEL / ADDITION
ARCHITECT
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CHILDCARE DESIGNER
ASSOCIATE DESIGNER
CONSULTANTS
LANDSCAPE CIVIL STRUCTURAL MEP
MATT FRANTZ PRINCIPAL
TOBY LEE
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL
RAYMOND QUAN PROJECT LEAD
TONY JAKOSALEM PROJECT MANAGER
KEVIN WONG
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL
PATRICIA ALGARA PRESIDENT
SUTTER WEHMEIER PRINCIPAL
SIOBHAN HUSSEY
PROJECT MANAGER
EINAR GUNTVEDT JUNIOR DESIGNER
TECHNOLOGY
CONSULTANT
PETER MCDONALD PRESIDENT
ACOUSTICAL
CONSULTANT
LIGHTING
DESIGNER
THOMAS SKRADSKI PRINCIPAL
COST
ESTIMATOR
VAUGHAN CLARKE
MANAGING DIRECTOR
GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER
LEROY CHAN PRINCIPAL
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEER
TO BE
SELECTED
CHRIS NICAS
PROJECT ENGINEER
MEENAM LEE
SENIOR DESIGNER
PETER MCDONALD PRESIDENT
SCHEMATIC
DESIGN
DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION
2. SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
152 HOURS
1. PRINCIPAL
77 HOURS
3. SENIOR CHILDCARE DESIGNER
112 HOURS
4. ASSOCIATE DESIGNER
187 HOURS
5. JUNIOR DESIGNER
187 HOURS
FIRM / TEAM MEMBERS
PROPOSED STAFFING BY PHASE
1. PRINCIPAL
74 HOURS
2. SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
159 HOURS
3. ASSOCIATE DESIGNER
194 HOURS
4. JUNIOR DESIGNER
188 HOURS
1. PRINCIPAL
69 HOURS
2. SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
142 HOURS
3. ASSOCIATE DESIGNER
189 HOURS
4. JUNIOR DESIGNER
180 HOURS
1. PRINCIPAL
95 HOURS
2. SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
255 HOURS
3. ASSOCIATE DESIGNER
215 HOURS
PHASE II TOTAL:
615 HOURS
PHASE III TOTAL:
580 HOURS
PHASE IV TOTAL:
565 HOURS
PHASE I TOTAL:
715 HOURS
3. RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
Dorman Associates, Inc. is an Architectural firm founded in 2001 that has specialized in Early Childhood Education Facilities, Hospitality, and Residential Design for twenty-two years.
Our children’s spaces are a blend of sound pedagogical design and commitment to eco-materials, energy efficiency, water conservation, and healthy environments that will meet the needs of young children and their families, their teachers, center administrators, and the surrounding community. We have extensive experience in the design of children’s centers for clients ranging from Head Start programs and community organizations to major corporations and, most recently, a major West Coast university.
Nowhere does the architectural truism that ‘form follows function’ apply more clearly than in the successful design of environments intended to serve the educational needs of the young child. Dorman Associates brings a high level of theory, especially in terms of experiential education, as well as extensive practice to such design challenges. Based on our extensive experience with major child development center projects, the firm has come to value a highly collaborative approach that involves carefully listening to a client’s goals and concerns.
We make certain that there is plenty of opportunity for continuing interaction involving key stakeholders throughout the design process. See Appendix C of this proposal for additional information about the Dorman Associates Design Process and Strategy.
We work together with our client to create innovative, flexible, and practical environments that are designed for teaching and learning. We are also committed to designing place-based spaces that enhance and promote a sense of community, as well as connecting the development to its larger surrounding neighborhood. Our Childcare Center designs pay particular attention to the layout of the center complex, as well as each classroom. Special attention is paid to creating efficient classroom layouts that support both teachers and children throughout the day, providing direct access to, and careful balance of, children’s activity spaces, toilet and hygiene spaces, and teacher support spaces.
CHILDREN’S CENTER DESIGN HIGHLIGHTS:
• Expertise in the design and integration of both intimate solo-play, library, large Art & Movement Studio spaces, and outside play areas inspired by nature
• Consideration of classroom, administrative, and playground and outdoor classroom adjacencies to promote usability, efficiency, and community gatherings
• Maximization of natural light and ventilation through window placement on both exterior and interior walls, including extensive use of borrowed light within interior corridors
• Child-Height Windows
• Teacher Support areas with half height walls allowing for constant observation and sight-line into the classroom
• Experience with sourcing and designing with natural, healthy, and sustainable interior classroom finishes
• Classroom furniture and activity space layout design
• Furniture designed specifically for 0-5 year old children Currently, Dorman Associates is involved in 10-15 active childcare projects throughout the Bay Area. Dorman Associates is very familiar with the process of ROLE
Childcare Specialty Architect
KEY CONTACT
Chris Dorman, Principal
[email protected]
Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Phone: (415) 380-7914
Fax: (415) 380-7915
YEAR ESTABLISHED
2001
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
17 Employees (4 Licensed Professionals)
SERVICES / AREAS OF EXPERTISE
• Program Development & Documentation
• Planning and Programming
• Full Service Architectural Design Services
from Schematic Design to Construction
Documents
• Interior Design Services
• Assist with outreach programs
• Construction Management Services
• Construction Observation Services
DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
collaborating with a variety of sub-consultants, including engineers, landscape designers, lighting designers, and acoustical consultants, amongst other specialized consultants depending on the specific needs of each project. Our firm also has experience with adaptive reuse projects, working within the constraints of the existing building to redefine the function of the interior spaces. Recent examples include our work with Guidepost Montessori designing childcare centers in San Rafael, San Mateo, and San Rafael, as well as Bright Path to Learning Child Development Center in Sacramento.
The founding concept of the firm is to create economical, functional and innovative projects based on the client’s needs. As a full service design firm we produce solutions that integrate inspired design ideas with cost effective options. We are continually exploring how to design buildings that heat with the sun, cool with the wind, light with the sky, and move into the future using renewable resources.
Using three-dimensional computer simulations with ArchiCAD software, we provide imagery as early as Schematic Design. By integrating construction experience and structural knowledge, the designs are tailored to meet construction industry standards in order to maintain budget conscious projects.
Our firm prides itself on working with the client and contractor as a team to avoid intractable issues. To date, Dorman Associates, Inc. has never been involved in litigation or claims of any kind.
SELECTED RELEVANT PROJECTS:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER PROJECTS
• 16,000 s.f. Midway Village Phase II - Daly City, CA (Under Development) • 1,900 s.f. Midway Village Phase I Modular Classrooms - Daly City, CA (2022) • 4,500 s.f. Guidepost San Rafael Children’s Center - San Rafael, CA (2022) • 11,500 s.f. Guidepost San Mateo Children’s Center - San Mateo, CA (Under Development) • 10,000 s.f. Guidepost San Ramon Children’s Center - San Ramon, CA (Under Development) • 4,800 s.f. North Bay Children’s Center Modular Classrooms (2019) • 4,000 s.f. Marin Horizon School Modular Classrooms (2022) • 8,000 s.f. ELCO Yards Childcare Center - Redwood City, CA (Under Construction) • 6,000 s.f. Potrero Hope - CCFC Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Development)
• 7,500 s.f. Wu Yee Childcare at Transbay II Buildings - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 5,300 s.f. Epiphany Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 5,200 s.f. Wu Yee Ocean Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 3,000 s.f. Wu Yee Childcare at Haight & Octavia - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 4,500 s.f. YMCA Balboa Childcare Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 18,000 s.f. University Enterprises, Inc. Child Development Center - Sacramento, CA (2023) • 4,000 s.f. YMCA Tung Lok Center at 88 Broadway - San Francisco, CA (2022) • 13,600 s.f. Childcare Center for Tech Company - San Francisco, CA (2017) STANFORD UNIVERSITY | 40,000 sq. ft. Childcare Buildings, 70,000 sq. ft. Play Area:
• 19,000 s.f. Stanford University’s Children’s Center Of The Stanford Community (CCSC) - Stanford, CA (2019) | Construction Cost: $12 Million
• 11,500 s.f. Stanford University’s New Campus At Redwood City Childcare Center – Redwood City, CA (2019) | Construction Cost: $11.5 Million
• 10,000 s.f. Stanford University’s Oak Garden Child Care Center - Stanford, CA (Under Development)
SAN LEANDRO SCHOOL DISTRICT
• Bancroft Elementary School PH I - San Leandro, CA (2023) • McKinley Elementary School - San Leandro, CA (Under Construction) • Roosevelt Elementary School - San Leandro, CA (2022)
INF/
TODD
PLAY
YNG. PREK
PLAY
PRE-K
PLAY
IN
F TO
D
Y.
P
K
COM
M.
RM.
Y.
P
K
Y.
P
K
Y.
P
K
TEAC
H
TEAC
H
TEAC
H TEAC
H
T
. ADMI
N
DI
R.
SECURED
PARKING
&
DROP-OFF
TEACHER AND ADMIN. SPACES
ONE WAY TRAFFIC TO AID IN
SAFE/ SECURE FOR DROP OFF,
USERS; PARENTS W/ STROLERS,
DESIGN STRATEGIES
Rendering for Materials Review: 2 Year Old Classroom
Design Process Using Technology
Design Strategy
Preliminary Fit Diagram
DESIGN PROCESS:
Stanford University’s Redwood City Childcare Center
TR T T T
DW
DW
REF
DW
DW
DW
RE
W DR
F
RE
F
W/D
REF
REF
REF
W/D
MAIN ENTRY
REF
REF
DW
DW
DW
RECEPTION
MAIN
CONFERENCE
ROOM
OPEN
OFFICE
LOBBY
DIRECTOR'S
OFFICE
DIR.
ASSISTANTS
OFFICE SMALL
CONFERENCE
ROOM
PROJECT
ROOM.
TEACHERS'
LOUNGE
MOM'S
ROOM
J.
FOOD
DIST./
COOK
STUDIO
COPY
IT.
CAR SEAT
STORAGE
CAR SEAT
STORAGE INFANT
CLASSROOM
9 INFANT
CLASSROOM
9 TODDLER
CLASSROOM
9 TODDLER
CLASSROOM
9 2 YEAR OLDS
CLASSROOM
12 2 YEAR OLDS
CLASSROOM
12 PRESCHOOL
CLASSROOM
20 PRESCHOOL
CLASSROOM
20 PRESCHOOL
CLASSROOM
20 MECH.
ROOM ELEC.
ROOM
STORAGE
STOR. STORAGE STORAGE
TEACHERS'
SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
NAP AREA
9 NAP AREA
9 STOR.
TEACHERS'
SUPPORT DIAPER/
TOILET
UNISEX
TOILET
UNISEX
TOILET
UNISEX
TOILET
PARENTS
RESOURCE
NOOK
CHECK-IN
STORAGE
STORAGE
TOILET
TEACHERS'
SUPPORT
STORAGE
STORAGE
STORAGE
TOILET
TEACHERS'
SUPPORT
TOILET
TEACHERS'
SUPPORT
STORAGE
STOR.
STOR.
BIKE
PARKING
P TRAILER
PARKING
STROLLER
STORAGE
PRESCHOOL PLAY AREA
TOTAL AREA: 12,762 sq ft
S.F. PER CHILD: 106
Final Classroom Photos : 2 Year Old Classroom
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
SELECTED RELEVANT PROJECTS
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
KEY CONTACT: Andrea Elkort
630 Drake Avenue
Sausalito CA 94965
(415) 254-5039
HORIZON COMMUNITY SCHOOL MODULAR CAMPUS
Horizon Community School (HCS) is a community-based, early childhood education program that opened its doors in Marin City in 2017. The program was founded in response to an April 2016 strategic needs assessment which showed the great need for affordable early childhood education located within the community of Marin City.
The mission of HCS is to advance educational equity and social justice by providing Marin City families with access to quality early childhood education in their community. Since its creation, the program has become an immediate success, offering essential early childhood education at an affordable tuition to children under 5 years of age. To meet the program’s full potential and continue to provide children and families within the community with access to quality early childhood education, HCS engaged Dorman Associates to help them create a new campus that will provide more classrooms and administrative spaces. The new campus will consist of:
● Three double wide modular classrooms programmed for different age groups ● A double wide modular administrative space
● Outdoor play area, providing play and gardening areas for the children The new spaces will provide much-needed support and education areas for teachers and children. The classrooms are grouped together in modular units with age-appropriate toilet and diaper areas, direct level access to outdoor play, maximum windows to increase natural light, open classrooms for proper supervision and janitorial closets.
A separate modular unit contains the administrative spaces that support the function of the school. It provides a single point of entry for security, a lobby area with check-in desk at the center’s main entrance, adult restrooms, teachers’ lounge, meeting room, and the director’s office.
With our familiarity of the modular units and understanding the limitations and opportunities that the modular platform allows, Dorman Associates, Inc. can innovatively and efficiently modify the units to meet our standard basis of design as well as the client’s programmatic and licensing requirements. An important factor in the success of our projects lies in our ability to prepare the site and coordinate grading, utilities, and drainage issues such that the site will be ready to receive modulars to sit level on the site and create valuable indoor / outdoor relationships for the classroom.
SAUSALITO, CA (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) | CONSTRUCTION COST: $1.6 MILLION 4’
2 YR OLD PLAY
CLASSROOM
FLEXROOM OR
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
1 8
3 4
5 7
7 2
9 10
10 6
11 13
13 13
14 14
15 16
16 16
16 9
18 22
21 19
19 17
17 ENTRY
PLAZA
12 12
24 24
23 23
OFFICE
16 25
20 12
17 26
17 NORTH BAY CHILDREN’S CENTER MODULAR CAMPUS
North Bay Children’s Center and Midway Phase I, based in Novato and Daly City respectively, are both non-profit, community-supported organizations that seek to equitably provide nurturing, developmentally based educational programs for children from age 6 weeks through age 5 years. Both organizations have experienced growth based on the great need for affordable early childhood education in their communities.
In 2018, North Bay Children’s Center (NBCC) engaged Dorman Associates, Inc. to create a childhood center with 5 modular units. Throughout the design and construction process, we were able to build strong relationships with the modular company, enabling us to efficiently modify them to provide, among other things, level access for indoor/ outdoor play where possible, increased windows to maximize natural light and access to nature, and age-appropriate toilet and diaper spaces.
The outdoor play area at NBCC includes a Garden of Eatin’ that provides a renowned nutrition program for participating families and the surrounding community.
As a testament to the success of the project, the community has expressed increased interest and demand, so Dorman Associates was engaged years later for a second time to expand their campus, building on the modular campus, creating a new 19,824 s.f. building that will increase their preschool capacity, expand the Garden of Eatin’ indoor and outdoor lab, and upgrade their teacher training and family involvement facilities.
For the Midway Phase 1 project, DA designed a temporary Preschool Center consisting of 2 modular units to be used while we are working on NOVATO, CA (COMPLETED 2019) | CONSTRUCTION COST: $800,000
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
KEY CONTACTS:
Susan Gilmore
932 C Street
Novato CA 94949
(415) 999-8457
Babs Deffenderfer
45 Midway Drive
Daly City CA 94014
(669) 252-2317
NORTH BAY CHILDREN’S CENTER MIDWAY VILLAGE
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
MIDWAY VILLAGE PH I MODULAR CAMPUS
DALY CITY, CA (COMPLETED 2022) | CONSTRUCTION COST: $1.1 MILLION a larger 16,000 s.f. center for them consisting of 9 classrooms and several admin spaces to support the facility. The level access for indoor/ outdoor play can be particularly challenging, but with careful and efficient planning and coordination, we were able to prep the site and design the modular units in a way that resulted in seamless placement, keeping to the budget and project schedule. The center includes our standard basis of design below and similar to NBCC, our experience and partnerships allowed for an efficient process keeping to the budget and schedule.
● Direct access to outdoor play
● Accessible entry for ADA & strollers
● Level access for indoor/ outdoor play
● Nature based play, age appropriate, encouraging exploration ● Added windows to increase natural light
● Single point of entry for security
● Natural materials, improving health of occupants
● Warm and welcome spaces
● Open classrooms to allow for proper supervision
● Age-appropriate toilet and diaper areas
● Standard up to code mechanical, electrical and plumbing
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
KEY CONTACT: John Stellar
10 Orchard, Ste. 200
Lake Forest, CA 92630
(214) 704-1146
GUIDEPOST MONTESSORI SCHOOLS
In response to a pressing shortage of childcare options, providers are actively exploring to re-purpose aging office spaces into thriving centers that cater to the needs of local communities. Dorman Associates has developed a partnership with Guidepost Montessori, a national provider, in developing their California centers in the cities of San Rafael, San Ramon, and San Mateo.
All three buildings were of wood-framed construction, and required seismic upgrades for converting into Group E & I-4 childcare uses. With the project budget and overall capacity of the center being a driving factor for the feasibility of the project, finding the balance between essential code upgrades and the center’s functional needs required careful consideration. A concerted effort was made for each project to reuse existing wall locations, ceilings, lighting, and plumbing to the greatest extents possible, which proves to be a challenge in office buildings that are not conducive to childcare use.
Both state and local codes presented their own obstacles in converting these buildings while maintaining the budget and viability of the project, perhaps the most significant being at the location of 2671 Crow Canyon Rd, San Ramon. This 3-story building is located SAN RAFAEL, CA (COMPLETED 2022) | CONSTRUCTION COST: $2.4 MILLION SAN MATEO, CA (UNDER DEVELOPMENT) | CONSTRUCTION COST: $2.3 MILLION SAN RAMON, CA (UNDER DEVELOPMENT) | CONSTRUCTION COST: $2.5 MILLION
GUIDEPOST MONTESSORI, SAN RAFAEL
EV
VANPOOL EV
CLEAN AIR
EV
VANPOOL EV
CLEAN AIR
VANPOOL EV
CLEAN AIR
WALL LEGEND
NEW HALF HEIGHT WALL
EXISTING WALL
NEW PARTITION WALL 2X4
NEW EXTERIOR WALL, 2X6
N
GENERAL NOTE
1. ALL NEW DOOR AND WINDOW TRIM TO MATCH
EXISTING.
DW
B B
8 C C
8 B
8 D D 8
9 B
4 3
2 1
A A
7 6
5 9
8 A
12 8
B
C
8 9
10 11
AA
AA
BJ
BJ BH
BH
CD
CB
BB
BB
AB
AB
AI
AI
AG
AG
AF
AF
AE
AE
AD
AD
AC
AC
AH
AH
AA.1
BI
BI
BG
BG
BF
BF
BC
BC
CA
CI
CH
CF
CC
CJ
CG
CE
BD
BD
BE
BE
2 A3.1
1 A3.1
1 A3.2
1 A4.1
1 A4.1
3 A4.1
3 A4.1
2 A4.1
2 A4.1
A
4 A5.3
A
4 A5.3
B
4 A5.3
3 A5.3
2 B
A5.3
3 A5.3
3 A5.3
A
4 A5.3
3 A5.3
A5.3
3 A
4 A5.3
A
4 A5.3
1 A4.2
1 A4.2
2 A4.2
2 A4.2
4 A4.2
DN
RAMP UP
7'-6"
AC-1
106
SIM.
SIM.
SIM.
SIM.
SIM.
SIM.
SIM.
30" x 48"
ADA CLR.
30" x 48"
ADA CLR.
30" x 48"
ADA CLR.
30" x 48"
ADA CLR.
30" x 48"
ADA CLR.
30" x 48"ADA CLR.
30" x 48"
ADA CLR.
30" x 48"
ADA CLR.
CHILDREN'S
HOUSE
CLASSROOM
NIDO
CLASSROOM
NAP AREA
TODDLER
CLASSROOM
TODDLER
CLASSROOM
TODDLER
COMBINED
RESTROOMS
GENDERNEUTRAL
RESTROOM
OFFICE LOBBY AREA/
CHECK-IN
JAN.+
W.H.
FOOD
PREPARATION
STAFF
LOUNGE
CHILDREN'S
HOUSE
CLASSROOM
CHILDREN'S
HOUSE
CLASSROOM
LAUNDRY
CHILDREN'S
TOILET AREA
HOUSE CHILDREN'S
HOUSE
TOILET AREA
GENDERNEUTRAL
RESTROOM
W
DR
REFR
REF
REFR
4 A4.2
11 11 CHILDREN'S
TOILET AREA
HOUSE
CHANGING
STATION PER
HIGHER GROUND
TRASH
BUILT-IN MICRO
TRASH
COT CAB.
TYP.
COT CAB.
TYP.
COT CAB.
TYP.
COT CAB.
TYP. COT CAB.
TYP.
ELEC.
CAB.
105
115
112
110
116
103 102
107
108
109
113
111
114
100
101
104
117
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
PROPOSED MAIN FLOOR PLAN
280°260°
NO WORK (N.I.C.)
BASEMENT/STORAGE
2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN
BASEMENT PLAN NOTES:
1. BASEMENT OCCUPANCY CHANGING
FROM BUSINESS TO STORAGE.
BASEMENT/STORAGE SQ. FT. AFTER
STAIR REMOVAL = 779 S.F.
LOAD FACTORS PER TABLE CBC
1004.5:
EXISTING:
723 S.F. / 150 S.F. (BUSINESS OCCUPANT
LOAD FACTOR) = 4.82 -> 5 OCCUPANTS.
PROPOSED:
779 S.F. / 300 S.F. (STORAGE OCCUPANT
LOAD FACTOR) = 2.59 -> 3 OCCUPANTS.
3 OCCUPANTS < 49 OCCUPANTS, ONLY 1
EXIT REQUIRED.
SITE LEGEND:
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
EASEMENT
NEW FENCE
(E) TREE
NEW SHADE
STRUCTURE
NEW CONC. SITE
WORK
NEW WOOD
DECKING
NEW RUBBER
TILES
GUIDEPOST MONTESSORI, SAN RAFAEL | FLOOR PLAN
H G F E D C B A
3 A7.1
+/- 21'-0" +/- 15'-4" +/- 17'-2" +/- 7'-0" +/- 6'-8 1/2" +/- 1'-8" 9"
10'-0" OFFSET
FROM FLOOR OF
EGRESS COURT
SHOWN SHADED, TYP.
10'-0" OFFSET
FROM FLR OF
EGRESS COURT, TYP.
SHADED AREA FROM GRADE TO
HEIGHT OF 10'-0" MIN. ABOVE
WALKING SURFACE OF EGRESS
COURT TO HAVE 1-HR RATED WALL
AND WATER CURTAIN UTILIZING
TYCO WS SPRINKLERS AT WINDOWS
STAIR IS SHOWN
DASHED
(N) 1-HR
RATING
TRANSITION
TO (E) WALL
(N) WND. HD. @
TYCO WS
CONDITION, TYP.
(N) WND. HD. @
TYCO WS
CONDITION, TYP.
(N) WND. HD. @
TYCO WS
CONDITION, TYP.
(N) WND. SILL @
TYCO WS
CONDITION, TYP.
(N) WND. SILL @
TYCO WS
CONDITION, TYP.
DR. THR. @
EXT. DECK
7 A7.4
14 A7.1
19 A7.1
19 A7.1
19 A7.1
18 A7.1
18 A7.1
18 A7.1
8 A7.1
(N) WND. SILL @
TYCO WS
CONDITION, TYP.
MAILBOX
CHILD'S PLAY AREA
5,557 S.F.
DW
W
DR
REF
1 7
1 3
3 3
5 3
3 2
1 3
3 3
3 6
3 3
3 3
2 2 3
2 3
2 2
3 5
5 8
1 4
4 4
5'-7" 5'-7"
28'-11" EXIT SEPARATION
40'-3" OVERALL DIAGONAL CLASSROOM 6
109'-7 1/2" OVERALL BLDG EXIT SEPERATION
156'-4 1/2" OVERALL BLDG DIAGONAL
42'-9 1/2" OVERALL DIAGONAL CLASSROOM 1
34'-10" EXIT SEPERATION
37'-9" OVERALL DIAGONAL CLASSROOM 7
18'-10"
EXIT SEPERATION
6'-3 1/2"
17'-0"
EXIT SEP. CLASSROOM 7
8'-5" 10'-0" 44" W.
MIN. 10'-0"
4'-0"
3'-0"
BREEZEWAY
OCC. LOAD = 39 PPL
BREEZEWAY
OCC. LOAD = 38 PPL
BREEZEWAY
OCC. LOAD = 121 PPL
32" CLR W. EXIT
(7) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(7) OCCUPANTS
MANUAL FIRE
ALARM PULL
32" CLR W. EXIT
(9) OCCUPANTS
I-4 DAYCARE 570 S.F./
35 S.F.=16 CHILDREN
GROUP E - EDUCATIONAL
1,215 S.F./20 S.F. =
61 CHILDREN
I-4 DAYCARE
500 S.F./35 S.F.=
14 CHILDREN
I-4 DAYCARE
565 S.F./35 S.F= 16
CHILDREN
GROUP E - DAYCARE
1,100 S.F. /35 S.F= 31 CHILDREN
GROUP E - DAYCARE
1,110 S.F./35 S.F= 32 CHILDREN GROUP E - DAYCARE
1,100 S.F./35 S.F.= 32 CHILDREN
115 S.F./150=
1 PERSON
130 S.F./200 S.F.=
1 PERSON
145 S.F./15 S.F.= 10 PERSON
EXIT
EXIT
EXIT
EXIT
EXIT
EXIT
EXITEXIT
EXIT
EXIT
EXIT
EXIT
EXIT
265 S.F./300 S.F.=
1 PERSON
EXIT
EXIT
MAINTENANCE
BREEZEWAY
TODDLER
CLASSROOM
OFFICE
INFANT/
TODDLER
CLASSROOM
PANTRY
INFANT
RR
NAP ROOM
STOR.
CH RR
BREAK ROOM
TODDLER
RR
CH RR
CH
RR
ALL
GENDER
RR
LAUNDRY
BICYCLE
ROOM
ALL
GENDER
RR
CHILDREN'S HOUSE
CLASSROOM
CHILDREN'S HOUSE
CLASSROOM
CHILDREN'S HOUSE
CLASSROOM
INFANT
CLASSROOM
ELEMENTARY
CLASSROOM
ENTRY
TODDLER
RR
112
110
107
113
124
121
125
102
104 101 105
106
108
109
111
114
116 117
128
118
127
120 119
123 122
126
129
103
REF
F
32" CLR W. EXIT
(3) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(8) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(30) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(31) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(8) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(8) OCCUPANTS 32" CLR W. EXIT
(8) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(31) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(10) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(32) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(1) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(1) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(16) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(16) OCCUPANTS
32" CLR W. EXIT
(121) OCCUPANTS
72" CLR W. EXIT
(79) OCCUPANTS
10'-0" OFFSET FROM
EGRESS COURT
1 HR RATED POSTS WITHIN
10'-0" OF EGRESS COURT,
TO HT. OF 10'-0", TYP. 1 HR RATED
WALL
1 HR RATED
WALL
1 HR RATED
WALL
270 S.F./150 S.F.=
2 PERSON
TRASH
RECYCLING
COMPOST
RECEPTION
ALL
GENDER
RR
NON-ADA
ALL
GENDER
RR
F.E.
F.E.
F.E.
GUIDEPOST MONTESSORI, SAN RAMON | EAST ELEVATION
GUIDEPOST MONTESSORI, SAN MATEO | CODE SHEET
on a steeply sloping site with a creek at the rear of the property, essentially confining the property on three sides. With the children’s classrooms being permitted only on the 1st & 2nd floors, it resulted in over half of the center’s capacity exiting into the rear play area at the base of the slope. This presented a crucial challenge in terms fire egress and child safety. After several meetings with the San Ramon Valley Fire District, the design team successfully addressed their concerns, some outside of code requirements, and ultimately gained full approvals for the project.
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
KEY CONTACT: Fran McIntyre
Pendulum Dependent Care Solutions
Los Altos, CA 94022
(408) 210-4235
BRIGHT PATH TO LEARNING CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The Sacramento Child Development Center is an adaptive reuse project which provides child care services for three public entities: Sacramento State University, SMUD and UC Davis Health. The conversion of 17,650 s.f. within a tilt-up concrete building presented its share of challenges, particularly in determining the location and size of exterior openings due to seismic upgrade requirements. With a focus on providing natural light and indoor/outdoor connection for each of the 15 classrooms, the design team created a dynamic and functional space that met the client’s goals for number of classrooms and child capacity, all while fitting within the constraints of the existing building footprint. The center also provides over 15,000 s.f. of outdoor play space and a children’s garden with sensory and edible plants.
Dorman Associates provided full construction administration services including contractor evaluation, contract review & bid award, review of RFIs and submittals, site visits, reoccurring OAC meetings and communication with the City as required.
SACRAMENTO, CA (COMPLETED 2022) | CONSTRUCTION COST: $9.3 MILLION
STORAGE
PLAYHOUSES AND
WILLOW TUNNEL
ALL-PURPOSE TABLES
LAWN WITH LOW MOUND
WHEELED TOY PATH
SAND PLAY WITH ATGRADE DECK
SECRET PATH (MULCH)
EDIBLE GARDEN
PLANTING
PLAYHOUSE VILLAGE
TUNNEL WITH WILLOW
STEPPING PRACTICE DECK
WITH HANDRAIL AT STEPS
HOSEBIB
"BRIDGE" WITH "MARSH" PLANTS PLAYHOUSES SEATING CIRCLE GARDEN TOOL STORAGE
BERLINER COSMO
CLIMBER
HILLSIDE SLIDE WITH
STONE SCRAMBLE STEPS
EXISTING TREE (TYP.)
NEW TREE (TYP.)
TEXTURE PANELS
HOSEBIB
WHEELED TOY PATH
ACTIVITY PANELS AT
DIVIDER FENCE
TRANSFER BOULDERS
POTENTIAL INFANT AND CAREGIVER SEATING AREA
STORAGE
WILLOW TUNNEL
MULTI-PURPOSE BALL PLAY AND DRAMA
FLEX SPACE
STORAGE LAWN WITH LOW MOUND
WHEELED TOY PATH
LAWN WITH LOW MOUND
2 12
5 6
10 8
1 11
4 9
3 7
SAND PLAY WITH ATGRADE DECK
DIVIDER FENCE
PERIMETER WALL / FENCE
RAISED PLANTER BOXES
WILLOW TUNNEL
STEPPING STONES, TYP.
COMPOST / SOIL
MIX BOXES
UCD GARDEN
HOSEBIB
EGRESS GATE
SAND PLAY WITH
AT-GRADE DECK
1 1
1 5
4 2
2 3
3 3
4 5
7 8
9 2 9
12 5
11 LEGEND
LAWN (LOW NOMOW TURF) FIBER SAFETY SURFACING
PLANTS FOR PLAY
PLAY SAND PERIMETER PLANTING
STABILIZED DECOMPOSED
GRANITE PAVING CONCRETE PAVING
6 REVISED SCHEMATIC DESIGN CONCEPT │21 October 2019
UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER, Sacramento, CA
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
SACRAMENTO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN
9/2/22
W/D
DW
REF
DW
DW
W/D
DW
W/D
REF
DW
REF
DW
DW
REF
DW
REF
REF
DW
DW
10 11
A
F
H
5 6 7 8 9
J
J900
G268 G268 G268 G268
K
J900
J900
J900
C
REF D W
REF
A276
A253
A250 A250
A250
A253
A250
A250
A250
A253
A273
A253
A250
A250
A250 A273
A253
A273 A253
A253
A250
A250 A276
A250
A250 A273
A253
A250
A250A276
A250
A250A273
A250 A250
A250
A253
A276
A273
A273
A253
A276
A253
A276
A273
A253
A253
A250
A253
A253 A253
A253
A276
A273
A253
A253
A253A250
A276
A273
A253
A253
A250
G28 G28 G28 G28
G268 G268
G28 G28
G268 G268
G268 G268
G268
G268
A253
G
425 sq ft 433 sq ft
2 Y/O 2
530 S.F.
CLASSROOM
14 CHILDREN
37 S.F./CHILD
PRESCHOOL
1 720 S.F.
CLASSROOM
20 CHILDREN
36 S.F./CHILD
PRESCHOOL
2 700 S.F.
CLASSROOM
20 CHILDREN
35 S.F./CHILD
KPREP 2
920 S.F.
CLASSROOM
24 CHILDREN
38 S.F./CHILD
KPREP 1
910 S.F.
CLASSROOM
24 CHILDREN
38 S.F./CHILD
OPTION
ROOM
665 S.F.
CLASSROOM
TODDLER 1
650 S.F.
CLASSROOM
12 CHILDREN
54 S.F./CHILD
TODDLER 2
545 S.F.
CLASSROOM
12 CHILDREN
45 S.F./CHILD
2 Y/O 3
530 S.F.
CLASSROOM
14 CHILDREN
37 S.F./CHILD
PRESCHOOL
3 715 S.F.
CLASSROOM
20 CHILDREN
35 S.F./CHILD
2 Y/O 1
685 S.F.
CLASSROOM
18 CHILDREN
38 S.F./CHILD
TODDLER 3
560 S.F.
CLASSROOM
12 CHILDREN
46 S.F./CHILD
FOOD
PREP
TEACHER
LOUNGE
LIBRARY /
ACTIVITY
SPACE
FLEX
PLAY
ATRIUM
STROLLER STORAGE
LOBBY
RECEPTION
OPEN
OFFICE
COPY
OFFICE
OFFICE
(E) ELEC. ROOM
CONFERENCE PROJECT
ROOM
UNISEX
RR
UNISEX
RR
IT
CL
MTG
RM MOM'S
RM
UNISEX
RR
UNISEX
RR
JAN. CL
REF
U.C.
MICRO
12 13 14 15 16
REF
INFANT 1
425 S.F.
CLASSROOM
8 CHILDREN
53 S.F./CHILD
INFANT 2
435 S.F.
CLASSROOM
8 CHILDREN
54 S.F./CHILD
INFANT 3
425 S.F.
CLASSROOM
8 CHILDREN
53 S.F./CHILD
U.C.
MICRO
DESK PANTRY
PANTRY
U.C.
MICRO
U.C.
MICRO
U.C.
MICRO U.C.
MICRO
U.C.
MICRO
DESK PANTRY
U.C.
MICRO
P PANTRY
W/ MICRO
& OVEN P
P
U.C.
MICRO
N
COMMUNITY SPACES/ FLEX
(LOBBY, LIBRARY, ETC.)
TOTAL OVERALL AREA: 17,150 S.F.
SUPPORT SPACES
(OFFICES, LOUNGES, IT
CONFERENCE RMS, MISC)
KEY PROGRAM ELEMENT SQ. FOOTAGE
2,035 S.F.
1,175 S.F.
PROGRAM ELEMENT SQ. FOOTAGE # OF CHILDREN S.F. / CHILD
INFANT CLASSROOMS 8 CHILDREN / CLASSROOM
24 CHILDREN TOTAL
53-54 S.F. /
1,285 S.F NET CHILD
KEY
TOTAL CHILDREN: 214 CHILDREN 2-YR OLDS' CLASSROOM
TODDLER CLASSROOMS
3 CLASSROOMS
PRESCHOOL CLASSROOMS
OPTION CLASSROOM
4 Y/O CLASSROOMS
45-54 S.F. /
CHILD
35-36 S.F. /
CHILD
37-38 S.F. /
CHILD
-
38 S.F. / CHILD
12 CHILDREN / CLASSROOM
36 CHILDREN TOTAL
20 CHILDREN / CLASSROOM
60 CHILDREN TOTAL
14 CHILDREN / (2) CLASSRMS
18 CHILDREN / (1) CLASSRM
46 CHILDREN TOTAL
ROTATING
24 CHILDREN / CLASSROOM
48 CHILDREN TOTAL
KEY PROGRAM ELEMENT # OF CHILDREN S.F. / CHILD
PLAY AREA 22,350 S.F.
1,755 S.F NET
3 CLASSROOMS
2,135 S.F NET
3 CLASSROOMS
1,745 S.F NET
3 CLASSROOMS
SQ. FOOTAGE
665 S.F NET
1 CLASSROOM
1,830 S.F NET
2 CLASSROOMS
CIRCULATION 1,675 S.F.
GOOGLE CHILDREN’S CENTER CAMPUS
SILICON VALLEY, CA (COMPLETED 2008) | CONSTRUCTION COST: $9 MILLION Google, a large Silicon Valley tech company, sought to redefine corporate childcare using a Reggio inspired philosophy to design a campus village of 5 centers. Each center was approximately 15,000 square feet and offered its own identity while maintaining a connection to the greater community. Included in the site was a large community garden and sustainable strategies to obtain a LEED Silver project rating. The campus included accommodations for infants and toddlers as well as preschoolers.
Sustainable strategies were employed to target a LEED silver rating including: Storm water collection and filtration, harvesting daylight through the use of clerestory window (as shown in the section below), natural ventilation and low VOC materials to eliminate off-gassing.
RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS
KEY CONTACT: Jeffrey Curry
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy
Mountain View CA 94043
(650) 253-0839
GOOGLE CHILDREN’S CENTER CAMPUS PHASE I
GOOGLE CHILDREN’S CENTER CAMPUS PHASE II
SILICON VALLEY, CA
Google chose to remodel an existing 1980’s office building that was close to its established campus in lieu of new construction at a more remote location. Creating a functioning Children’s Center in a two-story building was quite challenging at first, but many of the innovative solutions we devised proved highly workable. For instance, the need to provide an easy and safe exit from classrooms on the second floor resulted in a large balcony along the South façade that supplied outdoor space to the second story while bringing shading to outdoor areas at ground level.
Some of the sustainable construction ideas integrated into the design included window shading from the summer sun combined with operable windows to allow for natural ventilation on mild days; the use of low-VOC finishes to virtually eliminate off-gassing during construction; and extensive rainwater filtering strategies to reduce stormwater runoff from the site.
ENTRANCE PLAYGROUND CLASSROOM
MASS MODELING STUDY - PHASE II ENTRY PASSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM DESIGN
SILICON VALLEY, CA
The Phase II expansion of the complex sought to further use the Reggio inspired philosophy to design a village of centers. Each center was approximately 15,000 square feet and offered its own identity while maintaining a connection to Phase I. Included in the site was a large multifunctional family room with a performance stage, large community garden, and a indoor/ outdoor art studio with a kiln. Sustainable strategies were employed to obtain a LEED Silver project rating including: Stormwater collection and filtration, harvesting daylight through the use of clerestory window (as shown in the section below), natural ventilation and low VOC materials to eliminate off-gassing.
MASS MODELING FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY
4. FEE PROPOSAL & PROJECT
SCHEDULE
FEE PROPOSAL & PROJECT SCHEDULE
FEE PROPOSAL ATTACHED
(SEE NEXT PAGE)
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis:
Principal: 25 $240.00 $6,000.00
Senior Project Manager: 45 $200.00 $9,000.00
Senior Childcare Designer: 37 $180.00 $6,660.00
Associate Designer: 60 $150.00 $9,000.00
Junior Designer: 60 $130.00 $7,800.00
Subtotal Programming: 227 $38,460.00
Conceptual Design:
Principal: 18 $240.00 $4,320.00
Senior Project Manager: 39 $200.00 $7,800.00
Senior Childcare Designer: 20 $180.00 $3,600.00
Associate Designer: 50 $150.00 $7,500.00
Junior Designer: 50 $130.00 $6,500.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 177 $29,720.00
Schematic Design:
Principal: 18 $240.00 $4,320.00
Senior Project Manager: 42 $200.00 $8,400.00
Senior Childcare Designer: 22 $180.00 $3,960.00
Associate Designer: 50 $150.00 $7,500.00
Junior Designer: 50 $130.00 $6,500.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 182 $30,680.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Principal: 30 $240.00 $7,200.00
Senior Project Manager: 65 $200.00 $13,000.00
Associate Designer: 83 $150.00 $12,450.00
Junior Designer: 80 $130.00 $10,400.00
Subtotal Design Development: 258 $43,050.00
Interior Finishes & Elevations:
Principal: 30 $240.00 $7,200.00
Senior Project Manager: 65 $200.00 $13,000.00
Associate Designer: 83 $150.00 $12,450.00
Junior Designer: 80 $130.00 $10,400.00
Subtotal Interior Finishes & Elevations: 258 $43,050.00 Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Principal: 25 $240.00 $6,000.00
Senior Project Manager: 45 $200.00 $9,000.00
Associate Designer: 60 $150.00 $9,000.00
Junior Designer: 58 $130.00 $7,540.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 188 $31,540.00
Construction Set:
Principal: 15 $240.00 $3,600.00
Senior Project Manager: 37 $200.00 $7,400.00
Associate Designer: 50 $150.00 $7,500.00
Junior Designer: 46 $130.00 $5,980.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 148 $24,480.00
Plan Check Response
Principal: 7 $240.00 $1,680.00
Senior Project Manager: 17 $200.00 $3,400.00
Associate Designer: 23 $150.00 $3,450.00
Junior Designer: 22 $130.00 $2,860.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 69 $11,390.00
Bid Award:
Principal: 7 $240.00 $1,680.00
Senior Project Manager: 17 $200.00 $3,400.00
Associate Designer: 23 $150.00 $3,450.00
Junior Designer: 22 $130.00 $2,860.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 69 $11,390.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Principal: 75 $240.00 $18,000.00
Senior Project Manager: 210 $200.00 $42,000.00
Associate Designer: 175 $150.00 $26,250.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 460 $86,250.00
ARCHITECTURAL FEE TOTAL: 2036 $350,010.00
Abbr. =
CA
Abbr. =
SD
Abbr. =
DD
Abbr. =
IN
Abbr. =
PS
Dorman Associates Architecture
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
Abbr. =
CS
Abbr. =
PC
Abbr. =
BA
Abbr. =
PG
Abbr. =
CD
Consultants: PHASES: DA MARK UP
Landscape - Base Landscape Architecture PG-DD, PS-CA 10% $104,654.00 Civil - BKF
SD, DD, PS, PC,
CA 10% $49,244.80
Structural Engineering - ZFA Structural Engineers
PG-SD, DD, PSCA 10% $77,242.00
MEP - MHC Engineering
PG-SD, DD, PSCA 10% $106,480.00
Lighting - Lumenworks
SD, DD, CS, BACA 10% $27,335.00
Technology - Smith, Fause & McDonald
SD, DD, CS, BACA 10% $44,533.50
Acoustical Consultant - Smith, Fause & McDonald
SD, DD, CS, BACA 10% $21,087.00
Cost Estimating - Cumming CD-SD, DD, CS 10% $61,809.00
Geotechnical - ENGEO (NOTE: we are pursuing additional pricing) PG, SD, DD, PSPC, CA
10% $141,696.50
Transportation - ESTIMATED 10% $15,400.00
Subtotal Consultant Costs: $649,481.80
Additional Costs:
Dorman Associates: Reimbursable Expenses $2,500.00
Dorman Associates: Administrative Fees $4,000.00
Furniture Selection & Consultation - TBD TBD
Signage Review Package - TBD TBD
Spec Writer - Estimated $15,000.00
Subtotal Additional Costs: $21,500.00
Total Consultant Fees & Additional Costs: $670,981.80
TOTAL PROJECT COST: 2036 $0.00 $1,020,991.80
Dorman Associates Architecture - Consultants & Addtl. Costs 840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis:
Principal: 12 $240.00 $2,880.00
Senior Project Manager: 11 $200.00 $2,200.00
Senior Childcare Designer: 15 $180.00 $2,700.00
Associate Designer: 15 $150.00 $2,250.00
Junior Designer: 7 $130.00 $910.00
Subtotal Programming: 60 $10,940.00
Conceptual Design:
Principal: 6 $240.00 $1,440.00
Senior Project Manager: 12 $200.00 $2,400.00
Senior Childcare Designer: 10 $180.00 $1,800.00
Associate Designer: 10 $150.00 $1,500.00
Junior Designer: 20 $130.00 $2,600.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 58 $9,740.00
Schematic Design:
Principal: 6 $240.00 $1,440.00
Senior Project Manager: 12 $200.00 $2,400.00
Senior Childcare Designer: 10 $180.00 $1,800.00
Associate Designer: 20 $150.00 $3,000.00
Junior Designer: 20 $130.00 $2,600.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 68 $11,240.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Principal: 6 $240.00 $1,440.00
Senior Project Manager: 14 $200.00 $2,800.00
Associate Designer: 10 $180.00 $1,800.00
Junior Designer: 10 $130.00 $1,300.00
Subtotal Design Development: 40 $7,340.00
Interior Finishes & Elevations:
Principal: 8 $240.00 $1,920.00
Senior Project Manager: 15 $200.00 $3,000.00
Associate Designer: 18 $150.00 $2,700.00
Junior Designer: 18 $130.00 $2,340.00
Subtotal Interior Finishes & Elevations: 59 $9,960.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Principal: 10 $240.00 $2,400.00
Senior Project Manager: 20 $200.00 $4,000.00
Associate Designer: 25 $150.00 $3,750.00
Junior Designer: 25 $130.00 $3,250.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 80 $13,400.00
Construction Set:
Principal: 10 $240.00 $2,400.00
Senior Project Manager: 20 $200.00 $4,000.00
Associate Designer: 25 $150.00 $3,750.00
Junior Designer: 30 $130.00 $3,900.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 85 $14,050.00
Plan Check Response
Principal: 3 $240.00 $720.00
Senior Project Manager: 4 $200.00 $800.00
Associate Designer: 4 $150.00 $600.00
Junior Designer: 4 $130.00 $455.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 15 $2,575.00
Bid Award:
Principal: 3 $240.00 $720.00
Senior Project Manager: 4 $200.00 $800.00
Associate Designer: 4 $150.00 $600.00
Junior Designer: 4 $130.00 $455.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 15 $2,575.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Principal: 10 $240.00 $2,400.00
Senior Project Manager: 60 $200.00 $12,000.00
Associate Designer: 80 $150.00 $12,000.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 150 $26,400.00
ARCHITECTURAL FEE TOTAL: 629 $108,220.00
Dorman Associates Architecture
Westborough Preschool Addition
Abbr. =
PC
Abbr. =
BA
Abbr. =
CA
Abbr. =
SD
Abbr. =
DD
Abbr. =
IN
Abbr. =
PS
Abbr. =
CS
Abbr. =
PG
Abbr. =
CD
Consultants: PHASES: Fees:
Landscape - Base Landscape Architecture PG-DD, PS-CA 10% $104,654.00 Civil - BKF
SD, DD, PS, PC,
CA 10% $62,318.30
Structural Engineering - ZFA Structural Engineers
PG-SD, DD, PSCA 10% $22,385.00
MEP - MHC Engineering
SD, DD, PS-BA,
CA 10% $37,576.00
Lighting - Lumenworks (optional - generally not req'd for a modular project) SD, DD, CS, BACA 10% $69,740.00
Technology - Smith, Fause & McDonald
SD, DD, CS, BACA 10% $14,844.50
Acoustical Consultant - Smith, Fause & McDonald (optional) SD, DD, CS, BACA 10% $7,029.00
Cost Estimator - Cumming CD-SD, DD, CS 10% $23,820.50
Geotechnical - ENGEO (NOTE: we are pursuing additional pricing)
PG, DD, PS-PC,
CA 10% $56,386.00
Subtotal Consultant Costs: 10% $398,753.30
Additional Costs:
Dorman Associates: Reimbursable Expenses $2,500.00
Dorman Associates: Administrative Fees $4,000.00
Furniture Selection & Consultation $0.00
Signage Review Package $0.00
Spec Writer - Estimated $8,000.00
Subtotal Additional Costs: $14,500.00
Total Consultant Fees & Additional Costs: $413,253.30
TOTAL PROJECT COST: $521,473.30
Dorman Associates Architecture - Consultants & Addtl. Costs Westborough Preschool Addition
FEE PROPOSAL & PROJECT SCHEDULE
PROJECT SCHEDULE
PHASE DURATION MEETINGS WITH CITY STAFF
Phase I: 4-6 Months (Not incl. Planning)
Programming & Site Analysis 1 month 2
Conceptual Design 2 months 3
Schematic Design 2 months 4
Planning Submittal (If Necessary) (4-6 months) 2
Phase II: 2-4 Months
Design Development 2 months 3
Interior Finishes & Elevations 1 months 3
Phase III: 2-4 Months
Permit Set 2 months 2
Construction Set 2 months 2
Plan Check Response Permit Process (est. at 6 months)2
Bid Award Process 2 months 3
Phase IV:
Construction Administration 10-12 months Weekly or biweekly OAC meetings, site visits 1-2 times per month
5. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A:
KEY DESIGN TEAM
PERSONNEL
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE & SELECT PROJECTS:
• 16,000 s.f. Midway Village Phase II - Daly City, CA (Under Development) • 8,000 s.f. ELCO Yards Childcare Center - Redwood City, CA (Under Construction) • 6,000 s.f. Potrero Hope - CCFC Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 7,500 s.f. Wu Yee Childcare at Transbay II Buildings - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 4,000 s.f. YMCA Tung Lok Center at 88 Broadway - San Francisco, CA • 18,000 s.f. Bright Path to Learning Child Development Center - Sacramento, CA • 19,000 s.f. CCSC - Stanford Children’s Center - Stanford, CA • 11,500 s.f. SRWC - Stanford Children’s Center - Redwood City, CA • 13,600 s.f. Childcare Center for Tech Company - San Francisco, CA • 15,000 s.f. Google Children’s Center Campus - Phase I – Silicon Valley, CA • 46,000 s.f. Google Children’s Center Campus - Phase II – Silicon Valley, CA • 50,000 s.f. Google Main Headquarters Childcare Center Feasibility Study – Silicon Valley, CA • 13,000 s.f. Google Bernardo Campus Childcare Center – Sunnyvale, CA
EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley
Bachelor of Arts in Architecture
University of Oregon
Masters in Architecture
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Registered Professional Architect
CA License 28300
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
27 years total Experience
22 years with Dorman Associates
SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE EXAMPLES
CHRIS DORMAN
AIA
PRINCIPAL
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
Chris Dorman began architectural practice in the Marin County area in 1996 after graduate school when he joined the San Rafael firm of Chris Lamen and Associates because of their focus on sustainable design and affordable housing. He achieved Associate status three years later.
Assignments on which he worked ranged from a 193-unit affordable housing project to a senior center and accompanying 43-unit housing development. Since opening his own firm in early 2001 as Principal Designer, Dorman has undertaken a variety of project types while developing long-term relationships with a wide breadth of clients.
His experience has offered unique insights into how architecture can be a valuable backdrop to the engagement of a community through design. This work has dovetailed into Dorman’s work on Childrens’ Centers over the last several years. These projects include four Reggio-inspired child development centers for Google to serve its employees. Dorman led a team to coordinate the design process and Construction Documents, while collaborating with the County of Palo Alto, to obtain full project entitlements in less than ten months.
Another recent project was the largest Childrens’ Center in downtown San Francisco, a child development center with play areas carefully placed into an existing 33-story building and an adjacent plaza. This design included complex negotiations with the city’s fire department and planning departments, but is now complete and thriving. Dorman also engaged in a productive partnership with Stanford University which resulted in the design and construction of childcare centers at two of their campuses.
In addition to corporate Child Development centers, Dorman has also been collaborating as the consulting architect for the Low Income Investment Fund. This has led to a host of remodels and tenant improvement projects for non-profit providers throughout the Bay Area.
Each of these childcare center projects showcases Dorman’s true passion for creating healthy learning environments for children. Dorman’s interest in childcare architecture is related to his own family connection to childcare initiatives. His mother, Pat Dorman, is an advocate for early childhood education who managed a newsletter titled ‘On the Capitol Doorstep’ for nearly 50 years. Chris Dorman has continued his family history of involvement in childcare centers and programs that will enrich children’s lives for future generations to come.
Wu Yee Childcare at YMCA Bayview - San Francisco,
CA
Google Children’s Center Campus – Silicon Valley, CA
Stanford University’s Children’s Center Of The Stanford Community– Palo Alto, CA
Mary Peterson began her design career in Philadelphia in 2005, gaining experience in a wide range of architecture & design such as hospitals, office buildings, and retail spaces. Since joining Dorman Associates in 2007, Mary’s design expertise have been continually expanding and evolving to include a variety of child care, residential, hospitality and commercial projects. With a primary focus on the functional design of a space, code implications and accessibility, combined with a dedication to creating healthy environments that enhance the experience and quality of life for the end user, Mary brings a unique design perspective to any project and a breadth of knowledge.
Recent accomplishments include several adaptive reuse childcare centers in the Bay Area and Sacramento, each which posed significant challenges in terms of code requirements, project budgets and feasibility. Among those projects is a 17,000 s.f. Child Development Center in Sacramento, where Mary led the project from Conceptual Design through Construction Administration. This project presented various challenges, including gathering and analyzing programming needs and sustainable design goals from three different owner entities, and converting a tilt-up concrete warehouse into a space that can allow children to thrive in their environment. With a focus on providing natural light and indoor/outdoor connection for each of the 15 classrooms, the design team created a dynamic and functional space that met the client’s goals for number of classrooms and child capacity, all while fitting within the constraints of the existing building footprint. The center also provides over 15,000 s.f. of outdoor play space and a children’s garden with sensory and edible plants.
As a project architect, Mary is involved in all stages of the design process, from site analysis and conceptual design through construction documentation and construction administration. Mary has a strong ability to keep the complete project scope & budget in mind throughout the entire process, allowing for ease of communication and coordination between clients, consultants and contractors.
Mary also provides a strong knowledge of local, state and federal building codes, universal design, and sustainable materials.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE & SELECT PROJECTS:
• 16,000 s.f. Midway Village Phase II - Daly City, CA (Under Development) • 8,000 s.f. ELCO Yards Childcare Center - Redwood City, CA (Under Construction) • 6,000 s.f. Potrero Hope - CCFC Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 7,500 s.f. Wu Yee Childcare at Transbay II Buildings - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 4,000 s.f. YMCA Tung Lok Center at 88 Broadway - San Francisco, CA • 4,500 s.f. YMCA Balboa Childcare Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 18,000 s.f. Bright Path to Learning Child Development Center - Sacramento, CA • 13,600 s.f. Childcare Center for Tech Company - San Francisco, CA • 15,000 s.f. Google Children’s Center Campus - Phase I – Silicon Valley, CA • 46,000 s.f. Google Children’s Center Campus - Phase II – Silicon Valley, CA • 50,000 s.f. Google Main Headquarters Childcare Center Feasibility Study – Silicon Valley, CA • 13,000 s.f. Google Bernardo Campus Childcare Center – Sunnyvale, CA
EDUCATION
Philadelphia University
Bachelor of Science, Interior Design
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Registered Professional Architect
CA License 39587
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
18 years total Experience
16 years with Dorman Associates
MARY PETERSON
AIA
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE EXAMPLES
Stanford Children’s Center - Redwood City, CA
Childcare Center for Tech Company
- San Francisco, CA
Google Project - Palo Alto, CA
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
Ava Farab is an accomplished professional who has been an integral part of Dorman Associates since 2016. Her primary focus has been on leading childcare centers, Child Development Centers (CDCs) and Early Childhood Education Centers (ECECs), including notable projects such as two childcare centers for Stanford University and various centers for private and non-profit organizations.
During her time at the University of Michigan, Ava Farab’s passion for childcare architecture flourished, leading her to excel as a Research Assistant to Professor Sean Ahlquist. Her groundbreaking work involved pioneering the use of a large-scale CNC knitting machine to create innovative structures and materials. Focusing on enhancing the experiences of children with disabilities, particularly those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Ava developed interactive spatial installations, in collaboration with local schools and science museums. Collaborating with computer science teams, she programmed graphical interfaces, implemented spatial design solutions, and conducted comprehensive statistical analyses of sensory data to address challenges related to movement and social behavior in children, especially those with disabilities and attention disorders. Her research holds profound implications for advancing interactive and therapeutic spaces.
Since joining Dorman Associates, Ava has successfully led multiple childcare center projects.
Additionally, she serves as a consulting architect for the Low Income Investment Fund (LIIF), providing invaluable expertise on various initiatives. Notably, she represents LIIF’s interests in several Baby Prop C-funded projects throughout San Francisco.
Ava’s dedication extends to her involvement in the Children and Nature programs within San Francisco, as part of her work with LIIF. This initiative focuses on transforming numerous children’s play areas into nature-based environments, fostering meaningful play experiences. Currently, 14 sites are under construction as part of the 2022-23 cohort program, underscoring Ava’s commitment to creating vibrant and engaging spaces for children.
With her exceptional leadership, diverse expertise, and unwavering dedication to socially responsible architecture, Ava Farab continues to leave an indelible mark on the industry, positively impacting the lives of children and communities alike.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE & SELECT PROJECTS:
• 16,000 s.f. Midway Village Phase II - Daly City, CA (Under Development) • 19,000 s.f. CCSC - Stanford University Children’s Center - Stanford, CA • 11,500 s.f. SRWC - Stanford University Pine Cone Children’s Center - Redwood City, CA • 10,000 s.f. Stanford University’s Oak Garden Child Care Center - Stanford, CA (Under Development) • 20,000 s.f. North Bay Children’s Center - Novato, CA
• 6,000 s.f. Potrero Hope - CCFC Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 8,000 s.f. ELCO Yards Childcare Center - Redwood City, CA (Under Construction) • 5,200 s.f. Wu Yee Ocean Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 4,000 s.f. YMCA Tung Lok Center at 88 Broadway - San Francisco, CA • 7,500 s.f. Wu Yee Childcare at Transbay II Buildings - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 4,500 s.f. YMCA Balboa Childcare Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 8,200 s.f. Wonder Years Childcare Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 8,500 s.f. Guidepost Montessori CDC - San Rafael, CA (Under Development)
EDUCATION
University of Michigan
Masters in Architecture
IKIU, Tehran
Bachelor of Science in Architecture
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
9 years total Experience
7 years with Dorman Associates
AVA RAHIMI FARAB
ASSOC.AIA, LEED AP BD+C, WELL AP
SENIOR CHILDCARE DESIGNER
SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE EXAMPLES
Interactive Play Instrument for Children with Autism,
As part of the Research & Fabrication of Pre-stressed
lightweight structures at University of Michigan
Stanford University at Redwood City Childcare
Center– Redwood City, CA
Stanford University’s Children’s Center Of The
Stanford Community– Stanford, CA
Playscapes for interactive and therapeutic children
spaces.
Photo Credit: Detroit Free Press
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
After studying Art History and Studio Art at the University of California, Davis, Kyra relocated to San Francisco for an Operations role at a design agency. She went on to working in Human Resources and Recruiting at technology companies with bi-coastal and international offices. With her strong professional background in Administration, she joined Dorman Associates as an Office Manager in 2019 and decided to pursue an Associate of Science degree in Interior Design.
Upon graduating, Kyra transitioned to the design team at Dorman Associates. Her work experience to-date includes commercial, residential, and childcare projects ranging from small-scale tenant improvements to large-scale remodels. She is passionate about creating well-designed environments, carefully selecting cohesive materials and color palettes for each project to foster a positive user experience of the space.
Her talents in creativity, organization, and communication have been a strong asset for creating systems on the design side of the business to streamline processes for sourcing FF&E selections, managing the office Materials Library, and facilitating Construction Administration in collaboration with Project Managers.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE & SELECT PROJECTS:
• 6,000 s.f. Potrero Hope CCFC Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 8,000 s.f. ELCO Yards Childcare Center - Redwood City, CA (Under Construction) • 16,000 s.f. Midway Village Phase II - Daly City, CA (Under Development) • 7,500 s.f. YMCA Buchanan - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 18,000 s.f. Bright Path to Learning Child Development Center - Sacramento, CA • 4,000 s.f. YMCA Tung Lok Center at 88 Broadway - San Francisco, CA
EDUCATION
University of CA, Davis
Bachelor of Arts, Art History & Studio
Art
City College of San Francisco
Associate of Science, Interior Design
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
11 years total Experience
4 years with Dorman Associates
KYRA SIMON
BA, ART HISTORY & STUDIO ART
AS, INTERIOR DESIGN
ASSOCIATE DESIGNER
SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE EXAMPLES
Stanford University’s Children’s Center Of The
Stanford Community - Palo Alto, CA
YMCA Tung Lok Center at 88
Broadway - San Francisco, CA
Stanford Children’s Center - Redwood
City, CA
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
Einar Guntvedt joined Dorman Associates, Inc. in 2021 after graduating from UC Berkeley with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Architecture. Einar is a Bay Area native, born in San Francisco. He grew up in Veracruz, Mexico before he decided to return to California to pursue an Architecture degree.
While completing his degree at UC Berkeley, Einar was awarded a fellowship through the College of Environmental Design. The award consisted of an internship with an architecture firm in Oakland, CA where he gained experience working in multi-family affordable housing projects.
Since joining the Dorman Associates team, Einar has worked on various residential, commercial, and childcare projects with a focus on the latter. His experience with childcare projects at Dorman Associates has helped Einar expand his knowledge of building codes and how they influence the design process.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE & SELECT PROJECTS:
• 16,000 s.f. Midway Village Phase II - Daly City, CA (Under Development) • 5,100 s.f. Epiphany Infant Toddler Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 8,200 s.f. Wonder Years Childcare Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Development) • 4,500 s.f. YMCA Balboa Childcare Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 5,200 s.f. Wu Yee Ocean Child Development Center - San Francisco, CA (Under Construction) • 5,000 s.f. Quarry Child Development Center - San Carlos, CA (Under Development)
EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley
Bachelor of Arts, Architecture
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
2 years total Experience
2 years with Dorman Associates
EINAR GUNTVEDT
BA, ARCHITECTURE
JUNIOR DESIGNER
SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE EXAMPLES
Epiphany Infant Toddler Child Development Center -
San Francisco, CA (Under Development)
Wonder Years Childcare Center -
San Francisco, CA (Under Development)
Midway Village Ph II Child Development Center -
Daly City, CA (Under Development)
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
!"!
840 WEST ORANGE
PRESCHOOL
PROPOSAL FOR LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
BASE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
!#!
BASE Landscape Architecture, Inc. is an
award winning landscape architecture studio,
passionately dedicated to sensible improvement
of the outdoor environment, and engaged in
a wide range of local projects. With emphasis
on innovation and sustainable approach to
design, we direct the creative energy of our
talented team toward designing memorable
and inclusive spaces for the users of multi-unit
housing developments, schools and college
campuses, learning centers and children’s
environments, parks, streetscapes, urban
agriculture and more. Our capabilities extend
from master planning and multilingual
community engagement to concept design,
schematic design and design development,
construction documentation, assistance in bid
procurement and construction administration.
!"#$%&"'(#)"*$%
"+),-.$)./+$0%-')1
EXPERIENCE PROFILES
We are well versed in CalGreen requirements,
Green Point Rating and LEED certification,
Bay Friendly Landscaping principles, Low
Impact Development (LID) strategies, and
familiar with current applicable codes for
outdoor water use, storm water management,
ADA standards, play safety, and the like.
The core of our business is to collaborate
with clients and users to strategically design
outdoor environments that support their goals.
Our landscapes have measurable positive
impacts on work productivity, people’s health
and well-being, and on nature recovery. We
design environments that are valued for their
aesthetic beauty, rich experiences, and stories
they help create. Our designs are playful,
durable and smart.
BASE is wholeheartedly committed to projects
that allow people to connect with each other
and with nature. We believe in the value of
collaborating with community members,
local artists and consultants of related trades.
We are keenly aware that access to food,
nature, education and community can have
a transformative effect on people of all ages.
And we are passionate about designing lasting,
sustainable spaces that will have a positive
impact on generations of people.
BASE has been recognized through national
and international press and by the American
Society of Landscape Architects. We are sought
out for our track record of successful project
outcomes, hand-crafted designs, transparent
communication, unconventional solutions,
and our pursuit of well-being, quality and
authenticity.
145 A Lower Terrace, San Francisco, CA 94114
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)
Women Business Enterprise (WBE), SF
Micro Local Business Enterprise (MLBE), SF
Local Business Enterprise (LBE), SF
Minority Business Enterprise (MBE)
Small Business Enterprise (SBE)
Micro Small Business Enterprise (Micro SBE)
Company Tax ID Number: 45-5154215
Years in Business: 12
Number of Employees: 9
Primary Contact:
Patricia Algara, ASLA
Founding Principal
(415) 509-3728
[email protected]
!"#$%&'($)"*+,-
!$!
$%.)+!+%(
%,/%)%
!"#$%&#'()*+,-'&%'.*!"%'/%012
345)*65*4%/#'$#*7789)*:3*4%/#'$#*9;<=
5>45
?56@A3:BCD
Patricia is a recognized leader in coalition
building and community-driven design. She
creates landscapes that immerse children and
families of all backgrounds and abilities in
learning, exploration and play. Her work with
Bay Area municipalities and School Districts
and clients such as the Children’s Museum of
Sonoma County connects communities with
the built and natural worlds. A native Spanish
speaker, she has engaged Spanish-speaking
communities as collaborators in projects from
master plan to urban agriculture initiatives.
Patricia’s community involvement and
advocacy expand the boundaries of traditional
landscape architecture. She is the founder
of With Honey in the Heart, a non-profit
organization that creates healthy habitats for
and educates people about pollinators. She is
the co-founder of the Algarden Demonstration
Urban Farm, a center for permaculture
education and natural beekeeping. She
has taught at UC Berkeley, a class called
“Designing for Difference,” which focuses on
the social factors influencing the design of
public spaces.
Patricia has received national recognition for
her design, outreach, education and leadership,
and has won a national faculty ASLA award.
A beekeeper and apitherapist, she draws
inspiration from bees, whose artistry and
industriousness demonstrate that beauty,
function, structure, and communication can
and should coexist.
EDB65FG:C
Master of Landscape Architecture
University of California, Berkeley
Diploma in Earth Sciences
Biosphere 2 Columbia University, Tucson, AZ
Bachelor’s Degree in Latin American Studies
University of Arizona, Tucson
Fluent in Spanish
!3:HE6F*EI!E3GEC6E
>1'(1*6"-J*K,'(#$$,"%)*>1'(1*6"-J)*65
AG>>L*@%'&#")*K,-'(1%'*L%#M)*65
+"#'/N*5O#"%/1'*G'(#"'1(%,'12*>/N,,2)*>+)*65
61"2O,'(*D1P*61"#)*?#2O,'(*65
B>6A*6D6*C#M*6N%2&*D#Q#2,0O#'(*6#'(#")*
F"1%'%'.*6#'(#"*RF356ECS*!#(12-O1)*65
4,'.T#22,M*K%&&2#*>/N,,2)*6,OO-'%(P*:-("#1/N*
1'&*T-22*O,&#"'%J1(%,')*?#"U#2#P)*65
K%/N#22#*:V1O1*>/N,,2)*C#M*61O0-$)*3%/NO,'&
:/#1'*L%#M*E2#O#'(1"P*>/N,,2)*C#M*61O0-$)*
52V1'P)*65
?-#'1*L%$(1*W,"1/#K1'')*3#',Q1(%,'
K%$$%,'*?1P*E2#O#'(1"P*>/N,,2)*C#M*61O0-$*
?"%&%'.*D,/-O#'($*
50(,$*K%&&2#*>/N,,2)*W,,Q#"*K%&&2#*>/N,,,2
K%$$%,'*W%.N$/N,,2)*EQ#"#((*K%&&2#*>/N,,2)*A"##'*
>/N,,2P1"&)*>+B>D)*>1'*+"1'/%$/,)*65
L#'#(%1*L122#P*E2#O#'(1"P*>/N,,2*X*C#M*61O0-$
RESUMES OF KEY STAFF
!%!
?56@A3:BCD
Sutter knew he would be a landscape architect
very early in life. Growing up in Silicon Valley
at a time when the last cherry orchards in the
area were felled to make way for the tech boom,
he gained an understanding of the power of
“landscape memory” and the necessity for
ecological design in the built environment. His
very first job was at a specialty plant nursery,
and his love of the natural world has not since
waned.
Sutter has worked on multi-disciplinary
teams for landscape architecture firms large
and small, and the common thread in his
work has always been a commitment to the
greenest solutions each project can achieve. His
portfolio includes award-winning projects with
LEED Platinum certification, endorsement
from the Living Building Challenge, and the
world’s first four-star certification from the
Sustainable Sites Initiative (SITES). His areas
of expertise include green roofs/landscape
on structure, horticulture, and storm water
management.
Sutter has also served as the President of
the Edwards Mother Earth Foundation, a
charitable family foundation dedicated to
mitigating global climate disruption. With
a granting portfolio composed of projects in
energy efficiency policy and green building,
EMEF is a wonderful avenue for Sutter to share
his knowledge of deep-green architecture and
to make a lasting positive impact.
EDB65FG:C
Master of Landscape Architecture
University of California, Berkeley
Bachelors of Arts – Art History, Spanish
Pomona College
01..-)(
2-3#-+-)
!"%'/%012
345)*4EED*5!*
:3*4%/#'$#*Y<89
!3:HE6F*EI!E3GEC6E
Congregation Nevah Shalom Childcare, Portland, OR
Beth Shalom Day Care Center, San Francisco, CA
El Portal Housing, San Pablo, CA
=Z<*[,,&$%&#*3&)*3#&M,,&6%(P)*65
=\*B'%($
Choice in Aging + SAHA + Choice Learning Pleasant
Hill Campus, Pleasant Hill, CA
82 Units
]=(N*5Q#^*610%(,21)*65
\_*B'%($*5TT,"&1V2#*W,-$%'.
The Meriwether Condominiums - Portland, OR
The Redd on Salmon Street: A FoodHub for the Central
Eastside District - Portland, OR
Phipps Conservatory Center for Sustainable Landscapes
- Pittsburgh, PA*
New York Botanical Garden Native Forest Trail
Improvements & Ecological Restoration - Bronx, NY*
The Boy Scouts Bechtel Family National Scouting Center
Trail Master Plan - Glean Jean, WV*
Salvation Army Kroc Community Center & Urban Farm
RESUMES OF KEY STAFF
!&!
0+"43%&(
3100-'
!",`#/(*K1'1.#"
345)*65*4%/#'$#*7<;=
5>45
?56@A3:BCD
Siobhan has experience working on projects of
varying scales, from nature-based exploration
areas throughout San Francisco, to transitoriented multifamily communities with park spaces/ plazas and outdoor gardens within
senior-living communities throughout
California.
With a background in site-specific sculpture,
her design approach entails a playful
connection to the site’s embedded history in
order to create artistic and thought-provoking
landscape features that invokes a sense of place
for the user experience. Siobhan’s passion
is to create healing spaces that bring people
outside and facilitate a sense of curiosity and
engagement to the spirit of place.
Siobhan is also an active member of the
American Society of Landscape Architects,
serving as the immediate Past President for the
local Northern California Chapter, has training
in both LEED design and urban permaculture
practices and is a Professional Landscape
Architect in California.
EDB65FG:C
Bachelor of Science (B.S.), Landscape
Architecture, University of California, Davis
!3:HE6F*EI!E3GEC6E
Connecting Children to Nature, Low Income
Investment Fund, Five Childcare Centers in SF, CA:
• Mission Kids
• Friends of St. Francis
• Family Connections,
• SuperKids
=Z<*[,,&$%&#*3&)*3#&M,,&6%(P)*65
=\*B'%($
Maria Alicia Apartments Courtyard,
San Francisco, CA
_;*B'%($*5TT,"&1V2#*W,-$%'.
Buena Vista Horace Mann K-8, San Francisco, CA
Muriel Leff Mini Park, San Francisco, CA
Bridges Academy School, Oakland, CA
With other Landscape Architecture firms:
*Station East TOD Community & Affordable
Housing, Union City, CA. 26.5 acre site with 974
market rate housing & 157 affordable units with
urban plaza, public park, & sculpture garden
*Clearwater Living Community at North Tustin,
Santa Ana, CA. 110-unit senior assisted living and
memory care community
RESUMES OF KEY STAFF
!'!
!"##$%
&"'()*%+,-.%.-*(
23/'."-'%4-$50%)"&-63+'-"
8)<;;*$a^*b^
_;9Z
6,'/#0(*(N",-.N*6D*c*65
A#"O1'*G'(#"'1(%,'12*>/N,,2*,T*
>%2%/,'*L122#P)*K,-'(1%'*L%#M*
61O0-$
A#""P*K,""%$)*62%#'(*
3#0"#$#'(1(%Q#
.O,""%$d.%$$Q^,".
>GeE
fE53
>6:!E
64GECF
6:CF56F
BASE worked with the German International
School of Silicon Valley’s Mountain View
campus to assist them in the redevelopment
of their Kinder Play Yard. This play space
engages children ages two to six years old.
Working within a tight schedule and a small
budget, BASE focused on surface features
that would incorporate fun, engaging,
and colorful elements. Of the designated
Kinder Play Yard area, half had to be left
open for fire truck access so we turned it
into a painted pollinator trike path. In the
remaining space we incorporated a cushy
artificial turf outdoor classroom space, a
tipi, a play structure, a pirate ship, playful
mushroom stumps, a sand pit with a water
trough, raised vegetable planting beds, and
planting for pollinators.
!(!
!)!
*)-&!3(%#-)+!%&(
+&.-)&%.+"&%,(0!3"",(
#"'%6+"'#)-#30%)"&-63+'-"
_;9Z
g_;;@
+"#'/N*5O#"%/1'*
G'(#"'1(%,'12*>/N,,2
65*5"/N%(#/($*
fE53
?BDAEF
64GECF
FE5K
In collaboration with the French American
International School staff, BASE worked on
the development of their new Early Childhood
Center (ECC). The building layout forms two
courtyards with separate play areas for PreKindergarten and Kindergarten classes.
BASE led a series of design workshops with
school administration and educators to develop
a program for the outdoor learning and flexible
play areas based on the school’s mission, values,
and curriculum. The play areas provide ageappropriate activity settings and elements to support children’s physical and social
development. Features include sports and open
play area, gardening boxes, sand and water
play, play equipment for climbing, spinning,
and balancing, small and large group gathering
areas, and outdoor classrooms.
!*!
!"+ !
Z);;;*$a^*b^
_;98
6,'/#0(*(N",-.N*6D*c*65
g];;@
>#a-%,1*B'%,'*W%.N*>/N,,2*
D%$("%/(
K1((N#M*e%(,)*>BW>D
OJ%(,d$#a^,".
W,NV1/N*4#M%')*3K5*G""%.1(%,'
>GeE*
fE53
>6:!E
?BDAEF
64GECF
6:CF56F
FE5K
!%),#"&.(5%'(!%)-
!$&23'.0%)"&-63+'-"
BASE developed the outdoor play area for
the Children’s Day Care Center located on
the Carlmont High School Campus. The
Center cares for preschool age children of
Sequoia Union High School District staff
and employees.
The play area was designed to accommodate
24 children and is in compliance with
regulations established by CDE for child
care centers.
The play space was located to utilize the
valuable dense shade provided by an exisitng
large heritage oak tree. Features include
a playhouse climbing structure, flexible /
multi-use synthetic turf area, trike zone and
storage area, picnic snack tables and staff
seating. The play area landscaping includes
an apple tree for seasonal delight.
!""!
!"#!
.)%!-&(!3+,5(
5-6-,"$#-&.(!-&.-)
*$.$&/2"0%)"&-63+'-"
9^\*5/"#$
_;_9
6,'/#0(
g9_K
B>6A*+D66
@#'(*3,P2#)*K1"/P*[,'.*D,''*
4,.1'*5"/N%(#/($
U#'(dM,'.2,.1'^/,O
K1"/P*[,'.*D,''*4,.1'*
5"/N%(#/($
>GeE*
fE53
>6:!E
?BDAEF
64GECF
6:CF56F
FE5K
Students’ wellbeing and access to safe, unique,
high-quality, interactive spaces and nature are
at the forefront of the design. Each play area
shall be tailored to age-specific needs and
provide ample open space for active physical
play as well as quiet retreats. Running, trike or
scooter riding, play structure climbing, sliding
and age-appropriate physical development
should be accommodated and promoted.
Additional outdoor amenities such as intimate
seating areas, raised beds for gardening and
food growing, areas with natural elements
and materials, water play, and opportunities
for learning through play should be included.
Ample shade by tree canopies or shade
structures should be provided over seating and
high activity areas. Durability of materials,
maintenance and constructability need to be
considered.
!"$!
!"&/)-/%.+"&(&-6%3(
03%,"#
*3+.&"'(0%3+$73'
;^\*5/"#$
_;_]
6,'/#0(
g9;K
6,'."#.1(%,'*C#Q#N*>N12,O
+"#&*3,(N$(#%')*6,'."#.1(%,'*
C#Q1N*>N12,O
T",(N$(#%'d'#Q#N$N12,O^,".
>GeE*
fE53
>6:!E
?BDAEF
64GECF
6:CF56F
BASE worked on this historic courtyard, creating
a space to engage the youth of Nevah Shalom.
The team facilitated Youth Design Charrettes
for each of the classrooms in order to create a
new program for the courtayrd. Imporvements
include nature play areas, additional seating and
shade, as well as updated planting.
The courtyard primarily serves the preschool
classrooms with unique nature-play elements,
but BASE designed the space as the green heart
of the synagogue campus for all generations of
congregants. In celebration of a few massive
Western Red Cedars on the property that
recently died (to drought), BASE designed a
delightful “water table” for families to enjoy.
We are thrilled to share the story of this tree
as it progressed from a conceptual graphic to a
construction detail to the real deal.
!"!
WESTBOROUGH
PRESCHOOL REMODEL/
ADDITION
2380 GALWAY DR.
PROPOSAL FOR
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
BASE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
!"#!
!"#$%&'&%((
!"#$%&"#'(!')*$'"+(%)&#("
!"#"""$%&'
("(!)("(*
+,--./012$3/4546-6/1#$
+,/7681#$+9$:$+;
<="#""")<>"#"""
?5/$@A5/70%7,$B5AC%$;DD05/76
?5/$@A5/70%7,$B5AC%$;DD05/76#
?5/$@A5/70%7,$E67A6510,/$F$
B5AC%$9685A1-6/1$
?GH3$
I3;E
?+JB3
KL9M3N
+OG3PN
N3;Q
Muriel Leff Mini Park is a project located in
the Inner Richmond District of San Francisco.
BASE had the opportunity to redesign the
park after receiving community input from
the local neighborhood. In collaboration
with the San Francisco Parks Alliance, BASE
hosted a community workshop, presenting
our initial concepts on different types of
improvements, from play elements to nature
exploration areas, planting, to circulation
and seating areas. We designed a space that
offered an enhanced nature exploration
area in the corner of the site and increased
circulation and seating/ picnic areas
around the site. The nature exploration area
contains a dry creek that has been hard set
for maintenance, yet allows for stormwater
percolation, logs and stumps, as well as moss
covered boulders.
In collaboration with the San Francisco
Recreation and Parks department, the park
hosted a series of community planting days
to get community involvement into the
project as well. Overall, the site’s redesign
has increased the aesthetic and functional
value of the park and has provided a sense of
place for the community to enjoy.
!"$!
!"% !
(%&)*+',$-.*/%#0'
12#3
%,+-)#*$'"+(%)&#("
!'=$;7A6%
("!>$)$("("
+,/7681$1RA,.4R$+9$:$+;
<!'(Q
?5/15$+A.S$+,./12$9681'$,&$B5AC%#$
J86/$?8576#$:$+.D1.A5D$?6AT076%
U0DD$@,.A1#$B5AC$BD5//6A#$
>*!)V=V)WX!"#$
Y0DD'&,.A1Z%5/157A.S7,./12'.%
QQ3#$EQ;$;%%,70516%
Q6A01$;Y5A[#$;?O;)P++
?GH3$
I3;E
?+JB3
KL9M3N
+OG3PN
+JPN;+N
N3;Q
;U;E9?
BASE worked with the Santa Cruz County
to design a creek restoration, environmental
education park and interpretive trail adjacent to
the new local Library.
The Felton Discovery Park drew on community
outreach events to help us design this interactive
nature discovery park, and an interpretive nature
loop trail. The new project is aligned with the
Parks Department’s Draft Strategic Plan and
project partners include Felton Library Friends,
the Santa Cruz Public Library, the County
Department of Public Works, and the San
Lorenzo Valley Water District.
One of the main goals of the project was the
riparian restoration of the creek and education
about the entire watershed. We worked
with Americorps volunteers & California
Conservation Corps workers to remove invasives
by hand and plant native riparian plants with
protective cages.
The park includes two new bridges, riparian
restoration, a pollinator habitat garden, a learning
demonstration area with watershed exhibits, a tot
gravel dig area, a stage and amphitheater with
musical instruments, a nature play area.
!"& !
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
RESUME
1 KEVIN WONG, PE
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL
As an associate principal at BKF, Kevin has had the opportunity to work on a diverse range of projects. His 19 years of experience include extensive preparation of civil engineering reports, calculations, plans, specifications, and estimates for a variety of private development and governmental public works projects. Kevin has provided quality civil design for numerous types of projects including civic, hospital, biotechnology and educational campuses, residential and commercial development, roadways, and public utilities. Kevin’s primary responsibilities include design team and subconsultant coordination; grading, and utility design; and preparing plan sets at the schematic, design development, and construction levels.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering,
University of California,
Davis
REGISTRATION
Professional Civil
Engineer, CA No. 72285
TOTAL YEARS
EXPERIENCE
19 years, 19 with firm
Hillcrest Elementary School Site
Evaluation
San Francisco
James Denman Middle School
San Francisco
Fairmont Elementary School
San Francisco
All-Five Preschool Renovation
Menlo Park
LePort Schools Day Care Facility
Oakland
LePort Schools Day Care Facility
Emeryville
OUSD Castlemont High School
Projects
Oakland
Montclair Elementary School
Classroom/Multi-Purpose Room/
Cafeteria Building
Oakland
Vannoy Elementary School Playfield
Improvements
Castro Valley
Cambridge Elementary
Concord
Vahalla Elementary School
Concord
Fairmont Elementary School
Accessibility Improvements
El Cerrito
Pioneer Elementary Classroom
Union City
Ravenswood Middle School Phase 2
East Palo Alto
Three Ravenswood Playground
Renovations
East Palo Alto
Bohannon Middle School Pavement
Rehabilitation
San Lorenzo
Alum Rock USD Civil Services
San Jose
Tamalpais High School Modernization
Mill Valley
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
www.zfa.com | [email protected]
RESUME
MATT P. FRANTZ, SE
PRINCIPAL | PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Over the past 18 years, Matt Frantz has served in the role of structural engineer of record, project manager, and design engineer for a variety of education projects that include new construction, modernizations, design-build projects, remodels, and seismic evaluations. In addition to his design work, Matt has a broad understanding of the detailed code requirements for public schools, which greatly facilitates the design and approval process of school buildings.
Matt is committed to the responsibility of protecting the public trust that comes with structural engineering licensure and brings that mind-set to each project he is involved in. In addition to technical knowledge, he understands the importance of client and team relationships, overall project risk, and sound business decisions, all of which enable him to contribute to the overall success of each project.
Matt is adept in the use of the California Building Code’s Existing Structures chapter, the International Existing Building Code, California Historic Building Code, ASCE41. He has evaluated and retrofit many existing buildings for continued occupancy and reuse in both Life Safety and Immediate Occupancy categories.
Additionally, Matt has extensive experience with both the Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development (OSHPD) and the Division of the State Architect (DSA), including new construction, remodels, and seismic retrofits.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
ඵ Guidepost Montessori School * San Rafael
Bldg. Alterations for Private Preschool Conversion
ඵ Guidepost Montessori School * San Ramon
Bldg. Alterations for Private Preschool Conversion
ඵ Guidepost Montessori School * San Mateo
Bldg. Alterations for Private Preschool Conversion
ඵ Marin Horizon School Alterations * Pre-K-8th Mill Valley ඵ McKinley Elementary School Site Work & Shade Structure * San Leandro ඵ Roosevelt Elementary School * San Leandro
ඵ Bancroft Middle School Modifications * San Leandro
ඵ St. Thomas More School Retrofit Preschool-8th San Francisco ඵ McKinley Elementary School Seismic Evaluation Burlingame ඵ McKinley Elementary New TK Classrooms Burlingame
ඵ Phillips Brooks Elementary School Gym Menlo Park
ඵ Marin Elementary School Modernization Design-Build Albany ඵ USF Chabot Terrace Repair & Retrofit San Francisco
ඵ Lindhurst High School Track & Field Olivehurst
ඵ Granada Community Center Tenant Improvement El Granada ඵ Baden Avenue Commercial Building Adaptive Reuse South San Francisco ඵ Kensington Public Safety Bldg. Seismic Retrofit & Remodel Kensington ඵ Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower Evaluation & Retrofit Los Gatos * Projects with Dorman Associates
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
ඵ 15 years with ZFA
ඵ 18 years total
EDUCATION
ඵ B.S., Architectural
Engineering, 2005,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
PROFESSIONAL
REGISTRATION
ඵ CA Structural Engineer 5919
ඵ CA Civil Engineer 74846
ඵ State of California
Department of Emergency
Services Disaster Services
Worker Safety Assessment
Program ID #76361
PROFESSIONAL
MEMBERSHIPS
ඵ Structural Engineers
Association of Northern
California (SEAONC)
ඵ American Institute of
Architects Silicon Valley
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
Toby Lee, P.E.
Associate Principal/Project Manager
Project Team (Resume)
Toby is a registered Mechanical engineer
with a Bachelor degree in Mechanical
engineering. At MHC Engineers, Inc., he
involved in various projects, i.e. schools,
commercial, offices restaurant and
residential.
Toby is particularly interested on system
load estimation and operation sequencing.
With intensive study on different system and
system configurations, each design is a
result based on energy and cost
effectiveness.
As an Associate Principal, it is Toby’s
responsibility to organize and monitor
project status, work assignments and
communication with clients. He also assists
the staff in the design process on HVAC,
Plumbing and Fire Protection projects
including design, project specifications,
team coordination, and construction
administration for a thorough and successful
end.
Contact Information
[email protected]
Years of experience: 23 Years
Years of Firm: 23 Years
Education
Bachelor of Engineering Mechanical,
University of California, Davis
Professional Registration
Registered Engineer,
California M-32308
Hawaii 12683-M
Florida 68503
Oregon 82868
Louisiana 34140
Pre-School Projects
Epiphany Center
San Francisco, CA
Peekadoodle
San Francisco, CA
Montessori de Terra
San Francisco, CA
Pacific Rim Internation School
San Mateo, CA
Wu Yee Children’s Services
San Francisco, CA
L’Academy Language Immersion
• 1868 Van Ness Ave.
• 2001 Harrison Street
• 1222 Harrison Street
• 1040-1060 Geary Street
School Projects
Roof Top Elementary School
San Francisco, CA
Riordan High School
San Francisco, CA
A.P. Gianini Middle School
San Francisco, CA
Waldorf High School
San Francisco, CA
Mission High School
San Francisco, CA
Malcolm X Elementary School
San Francisco, CA
Muir Elementary School
Antioch, CA
Los Altos School District
• Almond School
• Loyola Elmentary
• Santa Rita Elementary
• Oak Avenue School
• Springer School
• Blach Intermediate School
• Egan Junior High School
Scotts Valley High School
Scotts Valley, CA
Housing Projects
San Francisco Housing Authority
San Francisco, CA
Treme/Lafitte & Tulane Gravier
Home,
New Orleans, LA
1830 Kapiolani Blvd.
Honolulu, HI
Edward II,
San Francisco, CA
UA Homes, 1040 University Ave.,
Berkeley, CA
5800 Third Street,
San Francisco, CA
Recreational Projects
YMCA Chinatown
San Francisco, CA
YMCA Buchanan
San Francisco, CA
YMCA Bayview Hunters Point
San Francisco
YMCA Embarcadero
San Francisco, CA
YMCA Presidio Letterman Pool & Gym
San Francisco, CA
YMCA Balboa
San Francsico, CA
YMCA Balboa
San Francsico, CA
Raymond Quan P.E.
Project Lead
Project Team (Resume)
Mr. Quan has 7 years of experience
working on a wide variety of HVAC
applications and job scales. He has
worked on projects ranging from small
and large scale residential developments,
to commercial tenant improvements, as
well as schools and restaurants. The
variety of projects Mr. Quan has worked
on, as well as his commitment to
continuing education for the latest
developments in the HVAC community,
have given him a depth of knowledge that
make him an asset at every stage of the
engineering process.
At MHC, Mr. Quan is responsible for
HVAC and Plumbing system design from
the schematic phase to final construction
documents, and manages construction
administration through job completion.
Contact Information
[email protected]
(415) 512-7141
Years of Experience: 7 Years
Years with Firm: 7 Years
Education
Bachelor of Science, Mechanical
Engineering
University of California, San Diego
School Projects
Galileo High School
San Francisco, CA
Mission High School
San Francisco, CA
Pacific Rim International School
San Mateo, CA
Housing Projects
HACSC Park Ave
San Jose, CA
372 Baker Street
San Francisco, CA
2835 Octavia Street
San Francisco, CA
15048 Saggio Hills
Healdsburg, CA
Offices Projects
IDEO
San Francisco, CA
Embark
San Francisco, CA
Shift
San Francisco, CA
1088 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA
1076 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA
550 High Street
Palo Alto, CA
Recreational Projects
YMCA Chinatown
San Francisco, CA
YMCA Buchanan
San Francisco, CA
YMCA Bayview Hunters Point
San Francisco
YMCA Embarcadero
San Francisco, CA
YMCA Presidio Letterman Pool & Gym
San Francisco, CA
YMCA Balboa
San Francsico, CA
YMCA Balboa
San Francsico, CA
Others Projects
SF Muni Islais Creek
San Francisco, CA
Tony C. Jakosalem, P.E.
Project Manager - Electrical
Project Team (Resume)
Mr. Jakosalem has more than 30 years’
experience in the field of Electrical
Engineering. He has worked extensively in
the conceptual design development,
preparation of the construction documents
and specifications, and construction of
documents with architects and developers
regarding new construction as well as
rehabilitation of mid-rise low income housing
and related projects.
As an Electrical Project Manager, Mr.
Jakosalem focuses on client relation and the
engineering and management of numerous
projects. He provides the innovative and
technical quality for the electrical discipline
of the project and assures the accuracy of the
project’s electrical system design, including
its integration of the overall project
requirements.
Contact Information
[email protected]
(415) 512-7141
Years of Experience: 33 Years
Years with Firm: 20 Years
Education
Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering,
FEATI University, Manila, Philippines
Professional Registration
Registered Engineer,
California E-15401
School Projects
San Francisco Unified School District,
San Francisco, CA
Novato Unified School District,
Novato, CA
CCSF Steam Building,
San Francisco, CA
SFSU – University Club,
San Francisco, CA
Epiphany Center
San Francisco, CA
Offices Projects
One Bush Street,
San Francisco, CA
595 Market Street,
San Francisco, CA
1275 Market Street,
San Francisco, CA
Pier Projects
Pier 1½, 3 & 5
San Francisco, CA
Pier 39,
San Francisco, CA
Pier 17
San Francisco, CA
Housing Projects
San Francisco Housing Authority,
San Francisco, CA
Bayview Hunters Point,
San Francisco, CA
Westlake Christian Terrace
Oakland, CA
Jackson Courtyard Condo,
Oakland, CA
Downtown River Apartment,
Petaluma, CA
Plaza and Ramona Apartment,
San Francisco, CA
Government/Public Sector
Projects
Virgin Amercia, Terminal 2,
San Francisco Airport
San Francisco, CA
Building 575,
San Francisco International Airport
San Francisco, CA
Business Data Center
San Francisco Airport
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco Housing Authority
San Francisco, CA
Alameda Housing Authority,
Hayward, CA
Hospital/Clinic Projects
San Francisco General Hospital,
San Francisco, CA
Foothill Family Community Clinic,
San Jose, CA
North East Medical Services,
• San Bruno Ave., San Francisco
• Noriega Street, San Francisco
Relevant Project Experience:
Pre-School Projects:
• Epiphany Center – San Francisco
• L’Academy Language Immersion Pre-School – San Francisco o 1868 Van Ness Avenue – San Francisco
o 2001 Harrison Street – San Francisco
o 1222 Harrison Street – San Francisco
o 1040-1060 Geary Street – San Francisco
• Montessori de Terra Linda Pre-School – San Francisco
• Peekadoodle – San Francisco
• Kai Ming – San Francisco
• Presidio Hill School – San Francisco
Other School Projects:
• San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD)
o A.P. Gianini Middle School
o Mission High School
o Malcolm X Elementary School
o Waldorf High School
o Guadalupe Elementary School
o Horace Mann Middle School
o Bryant Elementary School
o John O’Connell High School
o John Hancock Elementary School
o Rooftop Elementary School
o Galileo High School
o Sanchez Elementary School
o Aptos Middle School
o De Avila Elementary School
o James Lick Middle School
• Other Unified School District
o Westchester High School – Los Angeles Unified School District o Venice High School – Travis Unified School District
o Oak Elementary School – Los Altos School District
o Loyola Elementary School – Los Altos School District
o Santa Rita Elementary School – Los Altos School District o San Marin High School – Novato Unified School District o San Ramon Elementary School – Novato Unified School District o Hamilton Elementary School – Novato Unified School District • Others
o Muir Elementary School – Antioch, CA
o Park Middle School – Antioch, CA
o Marsh Elementary School – Antioch, CA
o Forestville Elementary School – San Francisco, CA
o Chinese American International School – San Francisco, CA o Bay Elementary School – San Lorenzo, CA
o McClymonds High School – Oakland, CA
o Roosevelt Middle School – Oakland, CA
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
1001 Sunnyhills Rd, Oakland, CA 94610
510-816-7600 www.lumenworks.com © 1980-2023, Lumenworks, Inc.
THOMAS J. SKRADSKI
PRINCIPAL, LC, IESNA, IALD
As Founder and Principal of Lumenworks, Thomas Skradski brings more than 40 years of professional experience and expertise in architectural, interior, and exterior lighting design to Lumenworks. His experienced leadership and personal involvement assure the highest level of design, quality of work, cuttingedge LED technology to provide the highest level of sustainability and quality while keeping within the client’s budget. The quality of his lighting solutions always adds additional value to the project.
Our Team along with Thomas’ leadership assures the client that all Lumenworks Lighting Designs Solutions are Title 24 Compliant and meet the highest sustainable energy standards required by the client whether it be LEED or WELL BUILDING. Through his leadership, our Team (5 members) always delivers our Lighting Designs to the Design Team on time and within the Budget.
Thomas has an innovative approach in conceptualizing and developing the overall design of a project as well as keen attention to the architectural details for both the landscape, and interiors. He combines an expertise in energy conservation with lighting retrofit and custom product designs. His widely published designs have been recognized nationally and internationally and have received numerous lighting design awards.
Thomas has developed a Value Engineering and Submittal Review Process that has brought total transparency to the projects’ lighting material cost and saved below their clients’ budget for their projects:
Stanford $412,000, Carmel Partners $240,000, Greystar $1,092,640 and Prado Group $99,084.
Thomas takes lighting design classes focusing on sustainability, energy efficiency, daylighting and energy efficient performance design, Title 24, lighting control systems, circadian lighting, lighting for wellness, light pollution – Dark Skies and environmentally responsible - exterior and roadway lighting.
Thomas and our team have designed lighting systems for Multi-family and Mixed-Use and Mixed-Income Residential Developments, Schools, Playgrounds, Parks, Affordable Housing, Luxury High Rise Residential Developments, Resorts, Corporate offices, Stadiums, Retail stores, Commercial facilities, Restaurants, Transportation facilities, Single-Family residences, Building Exteriors and Interiors, Streets, and Landscapes.
Additionally, Thomas has been a contributing author of Advanced Lighting Technologies Application Guidelines for the California Energy Commission and Visual Merchandising and Store Design. He has also served as a technical and design advisor for many lighting product manufacturers throughout his career. He was an instructor at the college of The Academy of Art and continues to teach lighting design and energy conservation seminars at the PG&E Energy Center, American Managers Association and The American Institute of Architects.
Education, Professional Affiliations, And Patents (Numerous Product Designs):
Architectural and Interior Design Studies, University of Nebraska Lighting Certified by NCQLP
American Society of Interior Designers, Professional Member (Former member 34 years) International Association of Lighting Designers, Corporate Member since 1985 Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, Member since 1985 Designers Lighting Forum, Member
United States Green Building Council, Member
1001 Sunnyhills Rd, Oakland, CA 94610
510-816-7600 www.lumenworks.com © 1980-2023, Lumenworks, Inc.
AWARDS
• Eleven – I.E.S. International Illumination Lighting Design Awards • One Edwind F. Guth I.E.S. International Illumination Lighting Design Award • Three Edison Awards of Excellence - G.E. International Lighting Design Award Program • Six Cooper Lighting – Halo / Metalux ASID Lighting Awards
PUBLICATIONS
• The Architectural Review
• Architectural Record Lighting
• Light Design + Application
• Better Homes and Gardens
• Architectural Lighting
• Designers West
• Interiors
• Visual Merchandising and Store Design
• Residential Lighting
• Contract Design
• Gentleman’s Quarterly
• Commercial Lighting
• The Art of Lighting
1001 Sunnyhills Rd, Oakland, CA 94610
510-816-7600 www.lumenworks.com © 1980-2023, Lumenworks, Inc.
MEENAM LEE
SENIOR DESIGNER, LC, LEED AP
Meenam joined Lumenworks and began her lighting design career after graduating from San Francisco State University in 2001. With more than twenty years of experience as a Lighting Designer and her interior design background, she brings valuable talent to each project. Meenam has worked on a variety of projects including designed lighting systems for Multi-family and Mixed-Use and Mixed-Income Residential Developments, Schools, Playgrounds, Affordable Housing, Luxury High Rise Residential Developments, Parks, Resorts, Corporate offices, Stadiums, Universities, Retail stores, Commercial facilities, Restaurants, Transportation facilities, Single-Family residences, Building Exteriors and Interiors, Streets, and Landscapes, Hospitality, corporate, Sports Facilities, Industrial, Video conferencing, and Residential and continues to explore the creative process. Her projects have attained LEED Silver & Platinum.
As a senior project manager, she is detail-oriented, sensitive to project needs, and able to coordinate with the design and construction team effectively to deliver quality lighting design packages on time. Meenam stays closely with current lighting technology and codes through continuing education to implement cuttingedge lighting technology to provide the highest level of sustainability and quality while keeping the client’s budget and needs in mind. Meenam continues to take lighting design classes focusing on sustainability, energy efficiency, daylighting and energy efficient performance design, Title 24, lighting control systems, circadian lighting, lighting for wellness, light pollution – Dark Skies and environmentally responsible - exterior and roadway lighting. Her classes also add to her lighting certifications.
Meenam enjoys both the technical and creative aspects of the lighting design process and pursues sustainable and environmentally friendly lighting solutions. She looks forward to the challenges of each new project and strives to apply the most up-to-date technology and products for the best design solutions.
Education
Bachelor of Consumer and Family Studies, Interior Design, San Francisco State University, 2001 Master of Architecture, Academy of Art University, currently working on degree
Professional Affiliations
Lighting Certified by NCQLP
LEED Accredited Professional
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, Member US Green Building Council, Member
AWARDS
• I.E.S. International Illumination Lighting Design Award – 2007 • I.E.S. Illumination Design Award – 2007
• I.E.S. Illuminating Engineering Society Lighting Design Award – 2015 1001 Sunnyhills Rd, Oakland, CA 94610
510-816-7600 www.lumenworks.com © 1980-2023, Lumenworks, Inc.
Zheng Zhong
Designer
Zheng graduated from Cal and completed his Bachelor’s degree in Architecture in 2013. He was inspired by his grandfather, Wenzuo Li, a Chinese architect who devoted all his life designing Classical Chinese Architecture. During his 10 years at Lumenworks, Zheng has done a large variety of projects in lighting design. Zheng works well with the Lumenworks Team finding that impossible light fixture for our clients. . He collaborates well with all team members and finds innovated lighting solutions for clients around the world.
With Western education and Chinese Cultural background on hand, Zheng finds a way to weave in both cultures in his design and bridge them in conceptualizing and developing the overall design of a project as well as keen attention to the architectural details and interiors. He combines an expertise in energy conservation while using cutting-edge technology with lighting retrofits and custom product designs. Zheng has designed lighting systems for Parks, Multi-family and Mixed-Use and Mixed-Income Residential Developments, Affordable Housing, Schools, Playgrounds, Luxury High Rise Residential Developments, Resorts, Hotels, Corporate offices, Stadiums, Retail stores, Commercial facilities, Restaurants, Transportation facilities, Building Exteriors and Interiors, Streets, and Landscapes, Hospitality, Sports Facilities, Industrial, Video conferencing, Transit Systems, Universities, Corporate offices, Stadiums, Commercial facilities, Landscapes, Single-Family residences, and such.
Zheng also continues to take lighting design classes focusing on sustainability, energy efficiency, daylighting and energy efficient performance design, Title 24, lighting control systems, circadian lighting, lighting for wellness, light pollution – Dark Skies and environmentally responsible - exterior and roadway lighting. Zheng Zheng continues to study lighting design in many different aspects such as acoustic & lighting integration, circadian lighting, power over ethernet, theatrical lighting solution, grow lights, Dark-sky, Well Building, LEEDs and sharpens his skills in 3-D modeling, energy consumption analysis, and Title 24 code compliance that reduce light pollution and provide human-centric lighting solutions to improve well-being and contribute to living and built environment. Zheng constantly is doing fixture and product research.
Education
Bachelor of Art in Architecture, University of California Berkeley, 2013 Minor in City and Regional Planning, University of California Berkeley, 2013
Professional Affiliations
AIAS (Former member 3 years)
Honor Society (Former member 2 years)
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
Telecommunications & Information Technology
Electronic Security and Surveillance Systems
Audio Visual Technologies, Acoustics
Professional Experience
38 Years Total Experience
34 Years with Smith, Fause &
McDonald, Inc.
Education
UCLA School of Engineering and
Applied Science, Master of Science,
1984
UCLA School of Engineering and
Applied Science, Bachelor of Science,
1982
PETER A. McDONALD, PRESIDENT
Peter McDonald is the founding principal of the firm with 38 years of experience in programming, design and construction administration services of state of the art low-voltage communication & technology systems, and engineering acoustics for public sector and commercial projects including schools, universities, libraries, community centers, multipurpose rooms and auditoriums. His expertise include design of data and voice telecommunication systems and infrastructure, audio-visual systems, data network systems, video distribution, media servers, distance learning, smart classroom technologies, VoIP and PBX, public address mass notification, sound systems, master clocks, broadcast systems, electronic security access control, intrusion detection, CCTV camera surveillance, and engineering acoustics including CHPS acoustical criteria, sound isolation, and HVAC noise and vibration control.
Relevant Project Experience - Partial List
Programming, Design, Construction Administration
Child Development Center, City College of San Francisco Child Development Center, University of California, Merced Child Development Center, County of Merced, Office of Education Child Development Center, Arizona State University
Child Development Center, Sierra Community College, Rocklin Campus Child Development Center, Cliff Bar & Company, Emeryville Child Development Center, Yorba Linda Library
Child Development Center, Elk Grove Library
Child Development Center, Foster City Recreation Center Prodigy Child Development Center, San Jose
San Mateo-Foster City School District - 6 Elementary Schools Palo Alto Unified School District, 8 schools
San Luis Coastal Unified School District, 17 schools
Mt Diablo Unified School District, 57 schools
Dublin Unified School District, 11 schools
Manhattan Beach Unified School District, 13 schools
Sonoma County Unified School District, 4 schools
Tamalpais Union High School District, 7 schools
San Bruno Park Elementary School District, 5 schools
Liberty Union School District, 2 schools
Union Elmentary School District, 7 schools
Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District, 1 school
San Leandro Unified School District, 2 schools
Stockton Unified School District, 2 schools
Byron Union School District, 3 schools
Lowell High School, San Francisco Unified School District Buena Vista Horace Mann Community School, San Francisco Brea Olinda High School, Brea Olinda Unified School District Morningside High School, Inglewood Unified School District Alum Rock Unified School District, District-Wide CCTV security system Campbell Unified School District, District-Wide CCTV security system South San Francisco Project Experience
The New Community Civic Campus, South San Francisco
Library, Park, Recreations and Police Headquarters
Telecommunications & Information Technology
Electronic Security and Surveillance Systems
Audio Visual Technologies, Acoustics
FIRM PROFILE & SERVICES
Smith, Fause & McDonald, Inc. (SFMI) is a leading design engineering firm specialized in design of IT Technologies, Telecommunications Infrastructure, Audio Visual Systems, Electronic Security and Architectural Acoustics for commerical and public sector projects including K-12 schools, community colleges, universities, libraries, community centers, auditoriums, city halls, airports, arenas, community centers, office and administrative buildings, public safety facilities, hotels, hospitals, and courtrooms.
Formed in 1986, SFMI provides needs assessment, master planning, campus standards, design, bid and construction administration services of data, voice and video networking systems including structured cabling infrastructure/horizontal cabling, pathways and closets, wireless networking, educational technology and audio-visual presentation systems, distance learning, SMART classrooms, broadcast and television production systems, video media servers, VoIP and PBX, public address paging systems, clocks, intercom, access control, intrusion detection, CCTV surveillance cameras, engineering acoustics including noise control, sound isolation and room acoustics.
SFMI designs state of the art and cost effective technologies for new construction and modernization projects tailored to the needs and requirements of School Districts with infrastructure capable of future growth. Whether designing systems for new facilities or for modernization, SFMI incorporates cost effective and proven working technologies that have great capacity and operational flexibility.
For current school technology and communication needs, SFMI understands the requirements of effective delivery for educational programs such as trade and vocational training, from robotics to residential framing, from communications engineering to applied bio-tech, and from IT network maintenance to music video production to aeronautics; and the requirements of comprehensive access and security systems. As such program are supported on quickly changing platforms and technologies, in addition to designing adaptive backbone infrastructure, SFMI designs the functionalities adaptable to future improvements.
Services are performed through planning, coordination, needs assessment, feasibility study, master plans and providing full design services with deliverance of complete construction contract documents starting with schematic design, design development and construction contract documents and by providing bid phase and construction administration services through end of performance testing and project close-out.
With extensive technical experience combined with its understanding of public bid process, SFMI successfully designs and procures high tech low voltage systems for projects that usually have tight construction schedules and budgetary restraints while meeting the challenges of the public bid process, DSA approval and public bid contractual mandates. One of the significant strengths of the office is the degree of personal involvement of principals and senior level engineers at each level of the project who are supported by skilled and long-term experienced engineering and production staff capable of responding to the demands of complex projects. Through its long term commitment in providing excellent value and service to every client, they have built a reputation for superb design capabilities, quality and cost effective systems engineering, on time and on budget project delivery, fresh insights to difficult problems, great attention to detail and excellent follow up.
SFMI is an independent consulting engineering firm with no affiliation to vendors, manufacturers, suppliers and contractors; serving its Clients' best interest and needs with no conflict of interest.
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
Vaughan Clarke, LEED GA – Page 1
Vaughan Clarke, LEED GA
Managing Director
Education
Bachelor of Science with
Honors, Quantity Surveying,
Cork Institute of Technology,
Cork, Ireland
Certifications
Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED)
Green Associate, USGBC
Affiliations
U. S. Green Building Council
Software Skills
AutoCAD
Buildsoft Global Estimating
DESTINI Estimator
Microsoft Office Suite
MS Project
On Screen Take-off
Revit
Vaughan has 15 years of experience in the construction industry, with a focus on providing cost management services within the K-12 Sector. As Managing Director, Vaughan's responsibilities include leading teams through quantity analysis, on-screen takeoff, specification review, obtaining price quotes, change order estimating, estimate reconciliation, and coordinating estimates from various project trades. He is involved with projects from the conceptual level through to construction level design documents.
Vaughan manages the cost team through all phases of milestone estimates, cost modeling, value engineering, and budgeting. In addition, he is responsible for monitoring our cost management services between milestone estimates and working with the project team in making sure we have addressed any viable cost options.
Representative Experience
Merritt College, New Child Care Development Center, Oakland, CA Cumming is providing cost management services for the construction of a new 20,737 sf, two-story, child-care development center, located on the Merritt College campus in Oakland, CA. The facility will include a child-care center, teaching classrooms, support spaces, and site improvements.
Additional Relevant Experience
Oakland USD - Glenview Elementary School, K-5 School Replacement, Oakland, CA
Addison Elementary School, New Admin/Library Bldg.-New Flex ClassroomsMod. Existing Bldg., Palo Alto, CA Burlingame SD - Roosevelt Elementary School, New Modular Classroom Wing & Restroom Bldg., Burlingame, CA
Burlingame SD - Washington Elementary School, New Modular Classrooms & Restroom Bldg., Burlingame, CA
Calistoga Joint Unified School District, Calistoga Elementary School, Modernization, Calistoga, CA
Cupertino Union School District, Blue Hills Elementary School Modernization, Saratoga, CA
Cupertino Union SD - Montclaire Elementary School, Campus Modernization, Los Altos, CA
Douglas County School District, Douglas High School Modernization, Minden, NV
Dublin USD - Murray Elementary School, New Modular Classroom Bldgs. & New Admin./Multi-Purpose Bldg., Dublin, CA
Hoover Elementary School, New Multi-Purpose Bldg.-Two New Classroom Bldgs.-Modernize Existing Bldg., Palo Alto, CA
Las Lomitas ES District, Las Lomitas Elementary School Modernization/ Expansion Master Plan, Atherton, CA
Offices Nationwide
www.cumming-group.com
COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Firm Profile
Cumming Management Group, Inc. (Cumming) is a privately held corporation founded in California in 1996.
Cumming is a leader in providing project consulting services to the A/E/C industry, including cost and project management, planning and scheduling, and construction dispute resolution. Now in its 27th year of business, Cumming has more than 1,850 team members within 50+ office locations, which provide services to clients around the world. Throughout its history, the company has remained focused on one goal: to assist its clients in managing the critical issues of time and cost from conception through closeout. With an understanding of program goals and expectations, a suite of solution-oriented services is provided to meet the project needs.
For this project, Cumming will serve as cost consultant. Cumming’s cost group is one of the largest providers of cost estimating and management services in the U.S., including a skilled team of in-house MEP cost specialists.
Cumming works on more than 400 estimates each month, delivering unparalleled experience in this discipline.
Core cost management services include budgeting, milestone cost estimating, value analysis, cost validation, peer review, and change order evaluation.
Relevant Project Examples
Merritt College, New Child Care Development Center, Oakland, CA (2019) Client: AE3 Engineering
Construction Value: $17 Million
Key Personnel: Vaughan Clarke
Cumming is providing cost management services for the construction of a new 20,737 sf, two-story, child-care development center, located on the Merritt College campus in Oakland, CA. The facility will include a child-care center, teaching classrooms, support spaces, and site improvements.
ChildStart Inc., Head Start Child Care Center Facility Condition Assessment & Reno/Replacement Options, Fairfield, CA (2019)
Client: Cannon Design
Construction Value: N/A
Key Personnel: Nick Mata
the project includes a Facility Conditions Assessment (FCA) for the existing 2,425SF childcare center. Additionally, the assessment will include a building replacement scenario.
SAUSD Jackson Elementary School, Convert Three Classrooms to Preschool Teaching Labs, Santa Ana, CA (2019) Client: Lionakis
Construction Value: $1 Million
Key Personnel: Alan Campbell
Cumming provided cost estimating services to the project architect, in support of a school renovation design at the DSA submittal phase. The project scope involved the conversion of three classrooms, encompassing 2,820 sq. ft., into preschool teaching labs and creating a child development center for the campus. The scope also involved modification/landscaping and expansion of the existing play area (9,000 sq. ft.) designated for the preschool. The new facility will provide early education programs for children aged 3-5 years old. Additionally, the project included an option to relocate the kindergarten play area, impacting 15,000 sq. ft.
Vacaville USD, Orchard Avenue Property New Pre-K Modular Classroom Bldgs., Vacaville, CA (2020) Client: ATI Architects
Construction Value: $1.7 Million
Key Personnel: Ryan Zuehlke
The 621 Orchard Ave project is a church campus that was recently purchased by the district. Six new modular Pre-K classrooms were added to the site. There used to be portables on the site that burned down, so removing existing concrete slab/underground/electrical shed for the new project was mandatory. The building had to be separated from the existing since they are not DSA certified, hence the fence between the two that extends into the parking lot.
Offices Nationwide
www.cumming-group.com
COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS
Monterey Co. Office of Education, Bard Blades Early Childhood Education Center Phase 11 Modernization, Salinas, CA (2020)
Client: Monterey County
Construction Value: $1.1 Million
Key Personnel: Alan Campbell
Cost Estimating in support of the modernization of the Bard Blades Early Childhood Education Center. Scope included renovations to four buildings encompassing 10,000 sq. ft. as well as site work. Involved interior improvements, MEP system modifications/upgrades, and site improvements to paving, fencing, and utilities.
KEY DESIGN TEAM PERSONNEL
LEROY LAI WO CHAN, GE, LEED AP
Principal
Leroy has more than 20 years of experience in the
geotechnical engineering field serving projects within the public and private sector. He serves projects including educational facilities, public facilities, recreation facilities, high-density in-fill residential and commercial developments, airports, transit centers, and medical care facilities. His experience includes urban in-fill, deep foundations and ground improvement, compressible soil consolidation,
liquefaction, and seismic susceptibility analysis. He has led geotechnical teams in the design and construction of many mid-rise and high-rise structures. Leroy encourages teams to collaborate early in the project such that all team players are synchronized on the goals and objectives while being able to take advantage of design optimization. Leroy’s experience has facilitated projects through DSA/CGS and agency
approval process.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
SFUSD W. Cobb Elementary School—San Francisco, CA
Project Engineer. Leroy provided engineering consultation and construction monitoring during construction of foundation related to the expansion of the existing structure. Soil grouting was used to stabilize foundation subgrade to improvement capacity of the soil to support the proposed seismic loading.
The improvements to the W. Cobb Elementary School
included a new exterior exit balcony, new stairways, ADA ramps, pathways, grading of the garden with new retaining walls, new play structures, and re-paving of the parking area.
John Swett Secondary School—San Francisco, CA
Project Engineer. Leroy provided a site-specific seismic design spectra analysis for the school project. The analysis was performed in accordance with California Building Code and DSA design standards. Leroy prepared responses to
comments during the CGS review process. He provided
engineering support during construction of permeation
grouting ground improvement to retrofit the existing
foundation system to support new design loads.
San Mateo County Wellness Center—South San
Francisco, CA
Principal Leroy led the geotechnical design team providing a value-engineered ground improvement design to support the County facility that allows for the use of conventional foundation. The design addresses concerns with construction
EDUCATION
BS Geotechnical and Environmental
Engineering, University of British
Columbia, 2000
EXPERIENCE
Years with ENGEO: 19
Years with Other Firms: 1
REGISTRATIONS &
CERTIFICATIONS
Geotechnical Engineer, CA 3001
Professional Engineer, CA 73217
LEED AP, CA
SPECIALIZATIONS
Ground Improvement
Compressible Soils
Deep Foundations
Shoring and Dewatering
Deep Excavations
Liquefaction Analyses
Seismic Spectra Development
AFFILIATIONS
ASCE American Society of Civil
Engineers
EERI - Earthquake Engineering
Research Institute
LEROY CHAN, GE, LEED AP
noise and is a cost-effective option while being able to reduce the impacts of ground settlement.
Balboa BART Multi-Family Residential Development—San Francisco, CA Principal in Charge. Leroy led the geotechnical design and construction of the 9-story tower building for the transit-oriented residential building with on-site day-care center. The project is built next to the Balboa Park BART station and SFMTA yard. The design of the structure had to avoid construction impacts to the BART tunnel. Various foundation alternatives were prepared to accommodate BART’s restriction and high structural demand. A ground improvement design was utilized to transfer the load away from BART’s zone of influence. The foundation involved construction of aggregate pier ground improvement and micropiles.
Francis Scott Key Elementary—San Francisco, CA
Project Engineer. Leroy provided a site-specific seismic design spectra analysis for the school project. The analysis was performed in accordance with California Building Code and DSA design standards. Leroy also provided consultation during CGS review of the study. Improvements included three new modular structures with new foundations, new ADA ramps with low retaining walls, an exterior exit balcony and stairway on the second floor, new pavement section in the play yard driveway providing vehicular access.
Center of Elders Building Rehabilitation and Retrofit – El Sobrante, CA Principal. Leroy led the geotechnical design for the renovation and rehabilitation of the existing one-story building to be repurposed for use as a senior care medical facility. The original structure was built in the 1960s. The plan will involve mandatory seismic retrofit and extension. Support of the structure required an assessment of new and existing foundation elements. The ENGEO team worked with the structural engineer in validating the existing foundation condition.
555 Franklin SFUSD District Administration Building—San Francisco, CA Project Engineer. Leroy coordinated and provided observation during subsurface exploration of the project. The field work included working within tight city right of ways and heavy traffic areas.
Improvements included a new ADA accessible ramp terminating at the main entrance facing Franklin Street with associated improvements; and the removal of a portion of an existing concrete retaining wall where the new ramp will be located.
Santa Rosa Jr College Student Housing—Santa Rosa, CA
Principal Engineer. Leroy provided consultation as a subject matter expert for the ground improvement system to help the project expedite the DSA and CGS approval process. Leroy advised the project team during preparation of the ground improvement design package for CGS approval. He acted as the client liaison in coordinating the ground improvement system with the CGS reviewer which allowed the project to receive approval to meet the aggressive construction timeline.
GLIDE Headquarters Rehabilitation—San Francisco, CA
Principal Engineer. Leroy led a geotechnical team for the design of the 8-story structure associated with the GLIDE Foundation. The project includes construction of a new structure and rehabilitation of the adjacent historic GLIDE Memorial Church and Community House. The project also requires a site-specific seismic-hazard analysis be performed. Careful planning of the excavation and underpinning support was necessary to minimize construction impacts to the neighboring buildings.
CHRISTOPHER A. STOUFFER, PE
Senior Engineer
Christopher assists in both design and construction services for projects in the public and private sector. In design, he assists in identifying geologic hazards and providing
foundation and/or ground improvement recommendations. In construction services, he assists in developing and
implementing QA/QC programs, developing construction
monitoring programs for existing structures, and providing onsite consultation. His projects are in both the public and private sector and include large planned developments, shoreline reclamation, residential mid-rise structures, and schools.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Cleveland Elementary New Classroom—San Francisco,
CA
Senior Engineer. Christopher assisted in developing the permeation grouting design, creating construction drawings and specifications, and developing and implementing a field quality control program for the liquefaction mitigation ground improvement program. Cleveland Elementary School is
situated in the Excelsior District located in southern San Francisco, west of Visitacion Valley. The school comprises a single-story new classroom building and three single-story temporary prefabricated classrooms. The project includes demolition and replacement of the existing single-story building located on the western boundary. ENGEO performed
geotechnical investigation, provided engineering observation services during the permeation grouting, and special
inspection services during the construction of the new
classroom building. The geotechnical exploration and
permeation grouting work received approval from the Division of State Architects Office (DSA) and California Geologic Survey (CGS). The special inspections for the new building are ongoing and anticipated to receive approval from the Division of State Architects Office (DSA) and California Geologic Survey (CGS) by the end of 2023.
Claire Lilienthal Elementary School—San Francisco, CA
Project Engineer. Christopher assisted in the implantation of the quality assurance and quality control program performed by ENGEO during ground improvement for stabilization of the liquefiable soil below existing and new footings of a classroom structure. The San Francisco Unified School District selected a ground improvement option consisting of compaction and permeation grouting for achieving the structural retrofit performance criteria of 0.5 inches of differential settlement beneath building footings over a span of 30 feet. In addition, ENGEO prepared the geotechnical exploration and geologic
EDUCATION
BS Civil Engineering Villanova
University 2016
MS GeoSystems Engineering UC
Berkeley 2018
EXPERIENCE
Years with ENGEO: 5
REGISTRATIONS &
CERTIFICATIONS
Nuclear Gauge Operator, CA 18009
Hazmat Certified as Required by
USDOT and IATA, CA
24 Hour SWPPP Certificate, CO
1807242245230
ACI Concrete Field Testing
Technician–Level 1, CA 01338637
ICC Reinforced Concrete (Assoc.),
CA 9705335
SPECIALIZATIONS
• Ground Improvement
• Seismic Slope Stability
• Compressible Soils
• Construction Observation
• Earth Retaining Structures
• Foundation Design
• Geologic Hazard Evaluation
• Liquefaction Analyses
• Plans, Specifications, and
Estimates
• Seepage Evaluation
• Slope Stability
CHRISTOPHER STOUFFER, PE
hazard assessment for a new gym building and the existing building retrofit. ENGEO provided engineering observation during foundation construction of the new gym and testing and observation services during earthwork for the existing building retrofit. All aspects of the project have received approval from the Division of State Architects Office (DSA) and California Geologic Survey (CGS). Following completion of the ground improvement work, the project was awarded the 2020-21 Outstanding Project Award by CalGeo in the Public Medium Budget Category.
Treasure Island, Phase 1 Geotechnical Improvements—San Francisco, CA Project Engineer. Christopher assisted in developing and overseeing the field quality control and progress tracking programs for ground improvement work for Phase 1 of Treasure Island. The ground improvement included wicks and surcharge, vibrocompaction, and deep soil mixing.
Additionally, he assisted in monitoring of existing buildings for movement and vibration during construction. The Phase 1 geotechnical improvements were performed to stabilize the ground prior to construction of approximately 1,900 high-density residential units, 110,000 ft2 of commercial/retail space, a ferry terminal, and the associated improvements.
Treasure Island, Phase 1 Infrastructure Improvements—San Francisco, CA Project Engineer. Christopher provided on-site consultation and coordination for the testing and observation services, special inspections, and materials testing services provided by ENGEO during the construction of the Treasure Island Phase 1 infrastructure improvements. ENGEO also provided on-going geotechnical consultation and evaluation during the installation of the infrastructure through soil that received geotechnical improvements. Christopher provided regular reports to the City of San Francisco Bureau of Construction Management (BCM), attended client, engineer, and contractor meetings, provide review and responses to submittals and RFIs as needed.
Treasure Island, Portico—San Francisco, CA
Senior Engineer. Christopher assisted in the field exploration, analysis, and reporting for the design geotechnical report. During construction, Christopher provided oversight of the engineering observations and special inspections performed during installation of the temporary shoring for the one-level basement excavation. Portico is a is a three- to six-story residential structure with two levels of pre-stressed concrete decks and wood-framing.
Treasure Island, Hawkins—San Francisco, CA
Senior Engineer. Christopher provided construction oversight of the engineering observations and special inspections performed during installation of the temporary shoring for the one-level basement excavation. Additionally, Christopher is actively providing oversight of the special inspections performed by ENGEO during the construction of the substructure and super structure.
Hawkins is a four- to six-story residential structure with two levels of pre-stressed concrete decks and wood-framing.
Treasure Island, Block C2—San Francisco, CA
Project Manager. Christopher coordinated and helped perform the field exploration, laboratory schedule, analysis, and report development for the four parcels of Block C2. Analysis and recommendations included 3D PLAXIS modeling for settlement analysis during and postconstruction, site-specific seismic hazard analysis and site-response, and deep foundations types and associated capacities. Block C2 includes a 31-story tower with two levels of basement, two podium structures, both up to 7-story podium with one level of basement, and a 23-story tower with two levels of basement. All four structures will be for residential use.
CHRIS R. NICAS, PE
Project Engineer
Chris joined ENGEO following his graduation from the
University of California, Berkeley with a Master of Science in Geotechnical Engineering. His experience in design and
analysis includes finite-element analysis with applications in dynamic soil-structure interaction, deformation modeling, and landslide mitigation. His work on various projects also includes geotechnical explorations, geophysical testing, sitespecific seismic-hazard analysis, nonlinear ground response analysis, ground motion selection, scaling, and matching, liquefaction assessment, consolidation settlement analysis, slope stability analysis, shallow and deep foundation design and analysis, earth retaining systems and excavation design, ground improvement, project management, and construction monitoring.
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
University of California, Berkeley Geotechnical for
Hesse-O'Brien Seismic Replacement Building—Berkeley,
CA
Project Manager. Chris assisted in the development and
execution of a full geotechnical exploration for the site including soil borings and rock coring. Additional geophysical testing included P-S logging, televiewer analysis, and
horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio testing. Chris developed recommendations for primary geotechnical concerns such as shallow and deep foundation design, excavations, and
shoring, and underpinning of existing structures in proximity to the planned excavation. The planned seismic replacement building is envisioned as a modern, state-of-the art,
interdisciplinary hub for the University, and will include research and teaching laboratories, offices, classrooms, and collaboration spaces within the existing footprint of Hesse and O’Brien Halls. ENGEO provided geotechnical and geologic design services and has prepared conclusions and
recommendations for concept design. The planned seismic replacement building is envisioned as a modern, state-of-the art, interdisciplinary hub for the University, and will include research and teaching laboratories, offices, classrooms, and collaboration spaces within the existing footprint of Hesse and O’Brien Halls. The new steel-framed structure will include six stories above grade with a small penthouse and two
basement levels below grade. We also proposed a more
rigorous non-ergodic seismic-hazard analysis to optimize design ground motions and economize on the superstructure.
EDUCATION
MS Geotechnical Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
2019
BS Civil Engineering University of
California, Los Angeles 2018
EXPERIENCE
Years with ENGEO: 4
REGISTRATIONS &
CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Engineer, CA 92639
Hazmat Certified as Required by
USDOT and IATA, CA
24 Hour HAZWOPER Training, CA
1907082291470
ACI Concrete Field-Testing
Technician–Level 1, CA 1888280
Nuclear Gauge Operator, CA 18425
SPECIALIZATIONS
• Compressible Soils
• Construction Observation
• Deep Foundations
• Earth Retaining Structures
• Ergodic and Non-Ergodic
Seismic-Hazard Analysis
• Excavation and Shoring
• Finite Element Analysis
• Foundation Design
• Geologic Hazard Evaluation
• Landslide Investigations and
Repairs
• Liquefaction Analyses
• Slope Stability
• Soil Structure Interactions
CHRIS R. NICAS, PE
Oakland Unified School District Geotechnical Services for Laurel Child Development Center #17126—Oakland, CA
Staff Engineer. Chris performed geotechnical drilling, sampling, and soil logging during the exploration phase of the project. Chris also performed the seismic hazard analysis for the planned school structures, leading to a more optimized and site-specific seismic design. The Child Development Center will be a new, approximately 10,000 square foot, single- story building to provide services for preschool and daycare that shares a campus with the Laurel Elementary School. Other improvements include a turf field and biofiltration stormwater treatment facilities.
Atlas Block Project—San Francisco, CA
Project Engineer. Chris managed the geotechnical exploration and testing including two deep borings, cone penetration testing, geophysical testing, laboratory testing, permitting, and traffic control. Chris also performed the seismic analysis and foundation assessment for the existing 200 Mission Street tower. The Atlas Block Project consists of three components: the Historic Complex, 200 Mission Street, and 50 Main Street. The proposed development will consist of a combination of existing structure reuse and construction of new structures. The existing 34-story tower built in the late 1960s, will be refaced and seismically retrofitted; two new low to midrise structures will be constructed within the Historic block; and a 75-story high-rise residential structure will be erected in the current location of 50 Main Street. ENGEO is the geotechnical engineer of record providing design recommendations related to new and existing foundations, seismic hazard mitigations, constructability, and temporary works. ENGEO is performing an evaluation of the foundation systems with a three-dimensional finite element model to predict differential performance more accurately between new and existing buildings. In addition, ENGEO is performing Non-Ergodic seismic-hazard analyses to optimize seismic ground motions. ENGEO is providing performance-based design seismic inputs to the structural designer utilizing conditional mean spectra, soil-structure interaction, and ground motion scaling. 300 Lakeside Tower—Oakland, CA
Project Engineer. Chris supported the geotechnical and geophysical explorations and performed foundation analysis and ground motion studies. Located along the Lake Merritt shoreline, this 28- story tower has served a wide variety of notable private companies, public agencies, and has defined the Oakland city skyline for over 60 years. As part of the ongoing seismic retrofit and renovation of the existing structure, ENGEO worked closely with the structural engineering team and architects to provide a highly refined seismic study by performing a non-ergodic seismic hazard analysis utilizing a unique ground motion hybrid scaling-matching approach. We recommended several suites of design ground motions for analysis of the structure based on ASCE 41 and catered to specific requests from the design team. We also evaluated the existing foundation capacities to support the renovation and retrofit design.
GLIDE Headquarters—San Francisco, CA
Staff Engineer. Chris carried out the geotechnical exploration, foundation design and assessment, and site-specific seismic-hazard analysis for the new and existing structures. The planned GLIDE Headquarters located at 330 and 334 Ellis Street will include construction of a new 8-story building with a 1-level basement, as well as a seismic retrofit of an existing 6-story building. ENGEO worked closely with the structural engineering team to provide a cost-efficient shallow foundation design for the new structure, developed robust underpinning and monitoring recommendations for sensitive adjacent structures, and provided recommendations for existing foundations to support the seismic retrofit. We also performed a site-specific seismic-hazard analysis in accordance with ASCE 7 and ASCE 41 to assess the performance of both new and existing structures, which allowed the structural engineering team to refine structural retrofit options.
Educational
Facilities
CORE SERVICES
Geotechnical Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Engineering Geology
Earthquake Engineering
Hydrology & Hydraulics
Instrumentation
Materials Testing
Special Inspection
Stormwater Management
Geospatial Engineering
Ground Heat Exchange
Systems
USA | NEW ZEALAND | AUSTRALIA | www.engeo.com
ENGEO’s in-house laboratories are
certified by the Division of State
Architect (DSA). Soil and materials
testing services are conducted with
state-of-the-art equipment and are
managed by registered geotechnical
engineers.
ENGEO is recognized for our extensive
experience in conducting Preliminary
Endangerment Assessments—
obtaining DTSC approval on one of
California’s first school-related
assessments.
ENGEO is an award-winning firm with
a strong local emphasis, and a
commitment to deliver the highest
level of quality to our clients. Since
1971, we have built a reputation for
finding solutions instead of problems,
while embracing project challenges as
opportunities to serve and innovate.
Project experience includes: New
Construction, Retrofit and Additions,
Turf Sports Field, All-weather Tracks,
Grading, Infiltration Facilities, and
Infrastructure Improvements.
I found ENGEO to be the Cadillac of services…when possible I always involve ENGEO on a project for our District. I would recommend ENGEO without any reservations for any work
you have on your horizons.
-William Draa, Superintendent
Ripon Unified School District
“
ENGEO has provided geotechnical, environmental,
stormwater, seismic analysis, and special inspection services for educational facilities for +50 years. We have extensive experience with local building codes, especially those
necessary for school sites.
ENGEO’s culture of empowerment, integrity and client
service has earned widespread recognition and respect.
USA | NEW ZEALAND | AUSTRALIA | www.engeo.com
San Francisco Unified School District
District Administration ● Claire Lilienthal Elementary ● Creative Arts Charter School ● Francis Scott Key Elementary ● John Swett Elementary ● St. Ignatius High School
Lycee Francais de San Francisco
Lycee Francais International School
Berkeley Unified School District
Berkeley High School ● West Campus Facilities
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Solar Projects for 51 School Sites
Oakland Unified School District
James Madison Middle School
San Ramon Valley Unified School District
Bella Vista Elementary School ● Quail Run Elementary School ● Hidden Hills Elementary School ● Coyote Creek Elementary School ● Gael Ranch Middle School ● Dougherty Valley High School San Jose Unified School District
Gunderson High School ● James Lick High School ● Solar Projects for 8 Schools Fairfield Suisun Unified School District
Angelo Rodriguez High School ● Anna Kyle Elementary ● Fairview Elementary ● Suisun Elementary ● Amy Blanc Public Safety Academy● Armijo High School ● Crystal Middle School ● Dover K-8 School ● Green Valley Middle School Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District
Leo R. Croce Elementary ● Junction Avenue K-8 School ● Rancho Las Positas School ● Portola Elementary ● Marylin Avenue School ● Livermore High School ● Joe Michell Elementary ● Jackson Avenue Elementary
Los Altos School District
Solar Projects for 9 School Sites
Roseville Joint Union High School District
Oakmont High School Turf Field and All-Weather Track ● Woodcreek High School ● Roseville High School ● Granite Bay High School●West Park High School Ripon Unified School District
Ripon High School
Lammersville Joint Unified School District
Mountain House High School
Irvine Unified School District
Great Parks Neighborhood (Heritage Fields) Schools
San Mateo Community College District
Skyline College
UC Berkeley
Hesse-O’Brien Building Seismic Retrofit
UC Davis
Academic Surge Building ● Jess S. Jackson Sustainable Winery Building
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
APPENDIX B:
SUB-CONSULTANT
PROJECTS LIST
APPENDIX B
SUB-CONSULTANT PROJECTS LIST
STRUCTURAL | ZFA
• Childcare Projects (5)
• Commercial Projects (4)
• Residential Project (1)
MEP | MHC
• Childcare Projects (6)
• Commercial Project (1)
LANDSCAPE | BASE
• Dorman Associates has engaged with BASE on multiple play area projects related to our LIIF Consulting work
CIVIL | BKF
• Childcare Projects (4)
LIGHTING DESIGNER | LUMENWORKS
• Multifamily Housing Project (1)
TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT | SMITH, FAUSE & MCDONALD
• None
ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT | SMITH, FAUSE & MCDONALD)
• None
COST ESTIMATOR | CUMMING
• None
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER | ENGEO
• None (Referral from ZFA)
DORMAN ASSOCIATES PROJECTS
WITH SELECTED SUB-CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX C:
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
APPENDIX C
1. DORMAN ASSOCIATES
2. BASE
3. BKF
4. ZFA
5. MHC
6. LUMENWORKS
7. SMITH, FAUSE & MCDONALD
8. CUMMING
9. ENGEO
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED HOURLY RATES:
DORMAN ASSOCIATES
ROLE HOURLY RATE
Principal $240
Senior Project Manager $200
Senior Childcare Designer $180
Associate Designer $150
Junior Designer $130
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED FEES:
BASE
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis:
Principal/Partner 12 $ 230 $2,760.00
Project Manager 8 $ 195 $1,560.00
Irrigation Designer $ 170 $0.00
Landscape Designer 8 $ 155 $1,240.00
Subtotal Programming: 28 $5,560.00
Conceptual Design:
Principal/Partner 8 $ 230 $1,840.00
Project Manager 16 $ 195 $3,120.00
Irrigation Designer $ 170 $0.00
Landscape Designer 38 $ 155 $5,890.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 62 $10,850.00
Schematic Design:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 16 $ 195 $3,120.00
Irrigation Designer 8 $ 170 $1,360.00
Landscape Designer 30 $ 155 $4,650.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 58 $10,050.00
Planning Submittal:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 10 $ 195 $1,950.00
Irrigation Designer 16 $ 170 $2,720.00
Landscape Designer 20 $ 155 $3,100.00
Subtotal Planning Submittal: 50 $8,690.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 36 $ 195 $7,020.00
Irrigation Designer 16 $ 170 $2,720.00
Landscape Designer 40 $ 155 $6,200.00
Subtotal Design Development: 96 $16,860.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 24 $ 195 $4,680.00
Irrigation Designer 12 $ 170 $2,040.00
Landscape Designer 40 $ 155 $6,200.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 80 $13,840.00
Construction Set:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 20 $ 195 $3,900.00
Irrigation Designer 8 $ 170 $1,360.00
Landscape Designer 40 $ 155 $6,200.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 72 $12,380.00
Plan Check Response
Principal/Partner 2 $ 230 $460.00
Project Manager 8 $ 195 $1,560.00
Irrigation Designer 4 $ 170 $680.00
Landscape Designer 12 $ 155 $1,860.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 26 $4,560.00
Bid Award:
Principal/Partner 1 $ 230 $230.00
Project Manager 4 $ 195 $780.00
Irrigation Designer 2 $ 170 $340.00
Landscape Designer 4 $ 155 $620.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 11 $1,970.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 32 $ 195 $6,240.00
Irrigation Designer 8 $ 170 $1,360.00
Landscape Designer 12 $ 155 $1,860.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 56 $10,380.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 539 $95,140.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 539 0 $95,140.00
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
Landscape - Base Landscape Architecture
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis:
Principal/Partner 12 $ 230 $2,760.00
Project Manager 8 $ 195 $1,560.00
Irrigation Designer $ 170 $0.00
Landscape Designer 8 $ 155 $1,240.00
Subtotal Programming: 28 $5,560.00
Conceptual Design:
Principal/Partner 8 $ 230 $1,840.00
Project Manager 16 $ 195 $3,120.00
Irrigation Designer $ 170 $0.00
Landscape Designer 38 $ 155 $5,890.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 62 $10,850.00
Schematic Design:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 16 $ 195 $3,120.00
Irrigation Designer 8 $ 170 $1,360.00
Landscape Designer 30 $ 155 $4,650.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 58 $10,050.00
Planning Submittal:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 10 $ 195 $1,950.00
Irrigation Designer 16 $ 170 $2,720.00
Landscape Designer 20 $ 155 $3,100.00
Subtotal Planning Submittal: 50 $8,690.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 36 $ 195 $7,020.00
Irrigation Designer 16 $ 170 $2,720.00
Landscape Designer 40 $ 155 $6,200.00
Subtotal Interior Finishes & Elevations: 96 $0.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 24 $ 195 $4,680.00
Irrigation Designer 12 $ 170 $2,040.00
Landscape Designer 40 $ 155 $6,200.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 80 $13,840.00
Construction Set:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 20 $ 195 $3,900.00
Irrigation Designer 8 $ 170 $1,360.00
Landscape Designer 40 $ 155 $6,200.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 72 $12,380.00
Plan Check Response
Principal/Partner 2 $ 230 $460.00
Project Manager 8 $ 195 $1,560.00
Irrigation Designer 4 $ 170 $680.00
Landscape Designer 12 $ 155 $1,860.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 26 $4,560.00
Bid Award:
Principal/Partner 1 $ 230 $230.00
Project Manager 4 $ 195 $780.00
Irrigation Designer 2 $ 170 $340.00
Landscape Designer 4 $ 155 $620.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 11 $1,970.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Principal/Partner 4 $ 230 $920.00
Project Manager 32 $ 195 $6,240.00
Irrigation Designer 8 $ 170 $1,360.00
Landscape Designer 12 $ 155 $1,860.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 56 $10,380.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 635 $95,140.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 635 $95,140.00
*This proposal is for the daycare playground only and it does not include a City park design Landscape - Base Landscape Architecture
Westborough Preschool Addition
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
August 9, 2023
Mary Peterson
Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
P. 415-380-7914 F. 415-380-7915
http://www.dormanassociates.com
PROPOSAL FOR 840 WEST ORANGE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PRESCHOOL
CONVERSION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Dear Mary,
Thank you for inviting BASE to put together a proposal for landscape design services for the preschool conversion with playground with appropriate play structures located at 840 West Orange Avenue in South San Francisco.
This document describes the professional relationship and scope of work that will guide us through a successful project.
I. PARTIES:
Client: Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Contact: Mary Peterson
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 415-380-7914 F. 415-380-7915
Consultant: BASE Landscape Architecture
Contact: Patricia Algara, Principal
145 A Lower Terrace
San Francisco, CA 94114
Tel: (415) 509-3728
Email: [email protected]
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
II. CONTEXT FOR WORK
The City of South San Francisco currently operates a library located at 840 West Orange Avenue in South San Francisco. In the fall of 2023, the facility will close as a library and its collections and other material will be moved to another facility. The intent of the City is to convert this property into a facility that will accommodate a licensed preschool program administered by the City’s Parks and Recreation Department. The existing structure is approximately 14,400 sf and is located on a roughly 1.5 acre parcel. In 2019, the City commissioned a feasibility study to evaluate the library and offer options on how to convert it to a preschool. The options offered in the study range from remodeling the existing facility to demolish and construct a new building. After careful review, the City intends to remodel the existing facility (Option 1 in the study) with minor changes to the floor plan. This option keeps the existing structure and remodels the interior to accommodate the preschool. In addition, a playground with appropriate play structures will be installed on the site.
III. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
The project to be phased out as shown below:
Task 1 – Programming Phase
BASE Landscape will meet with Dorman Associates and City staff to initiate the project. We will review the topographic survey, review community input collected by the City so far, and establish project goals and preferences.
• Meet with Dorman Associates and City Staff
• Perform site visit and data collection
• Review community input
• Review Topographic Survey
Meetings: One (1) Staff Meeting
Task 2 – Conceptual Design
Based on staff and programming data, we will develop up to two (2) Preliminary Design Concept alternatives and present them to the client.
Based on staff direction, we will distill the Preliminary Design Concept alternatives into a preferred Final Concept Design Plan.
• Develop (3) Preliminary Concept Design Plan Alternatives • Meet with project team
• Assist with presentation of Preliminary Concept Design Plan Alternatives to community, if needed.
• Develop preferred Final Concept Design Plan
• Meet with City staff
• Assist with presentation Final Concept Design Plan to the community, if needed Deliverables: Two (2) illustrative plan Preliminary Design Concept alternatives One (1) Final illustrative Final Conceptual Design Plan Meetings: Two (2) team Meetings
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
Task 3 – Schematic Design
BASE will begin to develop the design of the Final Concept Design Plan into working drawing format.
We will initiate coordination with the consultant design team.
• Attend a project team meeting
• Review code and local jurisdictional and design criteria for improvements • Refine Final Concept Design Plan and draft Schematic Design Plan • Preliminary irrigation design
Deliverables: Schematic Design Plan
Meetings: Two (2) Team Meetings
Task 4 – Design Development
BASE will research products, develop the necessary plans, specifications, elevations, sections and details.
4.1 Materials Plans
BASE will prepare a Materials Plan identifying materials for hardscape and site amenities, including play structures and equipment for age-appropriate play yard.
4.2 Irrigation Plan
An irrigation concept will be developed to show locations of point of connection, controller, and layout and sizing of irrigation mainline. The Irrigation Plan will be designed to accommodate a fully automatic, water conserving irrigation system designed per the State Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance requirements. Preliminary water use calculations per local and State ordinance will be developed.
4.3 Planting Plans
Prepare preliminary planting plans. Proposed plants will be located and identified with both botanical and common names, plant container sizes at installation, and quantities. Native and Mediterranean drought tolerant plant species will be used as appropriate to work with the proposed high-efficient irrigation system and the storm water treatment areas.
4.4 Construction Details and Technical Specifications Outline BASE will include design development details for hardscape and site amenities, site furnishings, and planting. Landscape Specification Outline sections will be provided.
Deliverables: CAD Plans and details at Design Development Outline format of Technical Specifications
Meetings: Two (2) Team Meetings
Task 5 – Construction Documents
Prepare landscape Construction Documents for building permitting, bidding, and construction.
Drawings will be submitted to the City for review and comment. Time is included for our response to 1 set of plan check comments.
5.1 Materials Plans
BASE will refine and finalize the Materials Plans for all landscape site amenities. A materials schedule will be included, identifying selected materials, products, colors, finishes, etc.
5.2 Layout Plans
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
BASE will prepare a Layout Plan describing and locating pedestrian hardscape areas, playgrounds and softscape areas.
5.3 Irrigation Plans
BASE will provide a fully-automatic water-conserving irrigation system plan for all proposed landscape areas. Legend of equipment, standard specifications, watering schedules, and water use calculations will be included to comply with all jurisdictional and WELO requirements.
5.4 Planting Plans
Refinement of planting plans for construction. All proposed plant materials will be located and identified with both botanical and common names, plant container sizes at installation, water use ratings, and quantities. A plant schedule will be provided.
5.5 Construction Details and Technical Specifications
BASE will include construction details for site furnishings, site amenities, pedestrian hardscape, irrigation, and planting with all written three-part landscape Specification sections prepared for inclusion in the Technical Specifications manual. We assume front-end specifications will be prepared by the City.
Deliverables: 65% Construction Document plans and Technical Specifications 100% Construction Document plans and Technical Specifications Meetings: Two (2) Team Meetings
Task 6 - Bidding and Construction Observation
During this phase, BASE will provide assistance for bidding clarifications, will respond to RFIs and review landscape submittals, and perform field observations for the approved landscape Construction Documents.
6.1 Bidding Assistance
BASE can review and respond to requests for bid clarifications.
6.2 Submittals
BASE will respond as appropriate to submittals requested in the specifications and notes.
6.3 Requests for Information (RFIs)
BASE will respond to RFIs, and prepare ASI & Bulletins as needed during construction.
6.4 Construction Observance, Punch Lists and Substantial Completion After project construction, BASE can assist and observe the site installation for conformance to the approved plans. Seven (7) site visits are included: one (1) pre-bid meeting, one (1) pre-construction meeting, three (3) site visits to observe construction progress, one (1) walk thru for punch list, one (1) final walk thru. We can be available to work on an hourly basis if additional assistance is requested.
Deliverables: Site Visit Field Reports
Final Punch List
IV. BASIS OF COMPENSATION
BASE will perform the services outlined above as part of this Agreement. Services are invoiced on a percentage complete basis to the designated fee breakdown below.
Fee proposal has been submitted seperatelly.
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
2023 Hourly Standard Billing Rate Schedule
Classification Standard Hourly Rate
Principal $230
Landscape Architect/Project Manager $195
Bilingual Community Outreach $200
Irrigation Designer $170
Landscape Designer $155
Translation $140
Administrative Assistant $ 95
Reimbursable expenses such as travel, mileage, and printing will be reimbursed at cost.
Fees are invoices monthly on a percent complete basis, and include reimbursable expenses. Payment terms are net 30. Invoices that are unpaid beyond 30 days of the due date of invoice will bear a service charge of 1.5% per month (18% per annum).
I. PAYMENT
Payments may be sent via check to:
BASE Landscape Architecture
EIN: 45-5154215
145 A Lower Terrace
San Francisco, CA 94114
Faithfully Submitted by: Approved by:
BASE Landscape Architecture
______________ ______________
Patricia Algara, ASLA, PLA
CA LA License 6691
Founding Principal
August 9, 2023
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
August 9, 2023
Mary Peterson
Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
P. 415-380-7914 F. 415-380-7915
http://www.dormanassociates.com
PROPOSAL FOR Westborough Preschool Remodel/Addition- 2380 Galway Dr.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Dear Mary,
Thank you for inviting BASE to put together a proposal for landscape design services for the Westborough Preschool Remodel/Addition located at 2380 Galway Dr. in South San Francisco.
This document describes the professional relationship and scope of work that will guide us through a successful project.
I. PARTIES:
Client: Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Contact: Mary Peterson
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 415-380-7914 F. 415-380-7915
Consultant: BASE Landscape Architecture
Contact: Patricia Algara, Principal
145 A Lower Terrace
San Francisco, CA 94114
Tel: (415) 509-3728
Email: [email protected]
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
II. CONTEXT FOR WORK
The City currently operates an existing preschool program located at its community center located at 2380 Galway Drive, South San Francisco. The City intends to provide additional classrooms at the community center for an additional 60 students (20 students per class).
To accomplish this, the City will add three relocatable classroom buildings (portable structures) with full toilet facilities within each new classroom. These new structures will be located on the same site as the community center. The existing site will have to be surveyed for placement of the portable classrooms. In addition, a new playground with play structures will also be added to this facility
This proposal is for the play yard of the preschool only and does not include design services for the adjacent park.
III. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
The project to be phased out as shown below:
Task 1 – Programming Phase
BASE Landscape will meet with Dorman Associates and City staff to initiate the project. We will review the topographic survey, review community input collected by the City so far, and establish project goals and preferences.
• Meet with Dorman Associates and City Staff
• Perform site visit and data collection
• Review community input
• Review Topographic Survey
Meetings: One (1) Staff Meeting
Task 2 – Conceptual Design
Based on staff and programming data, we will develop up to two (2) Preliminary Design Concept alternatives and present them to the client.
Based on staff direction, we will distill the Preliminary Design Concept alternatives into a preferred Final Concept Design Plan.
• Develop (3) Preliminary Concept Design Plan Alternatives • Meet with project team
• Assist with presentation of Preliminary Concept Design Plan Alternatives to community, if needed.
• Develop preferred Final Concept Design Plan
• Meet with City staff
• Assist with presentation Final Concept Design Plan to the community, if needed Deliverables: Two (2) illustrative plan Preliminary Design Concept alternatives One (1) Final illustrative Final Conceptual Design Plan Meetings: Two (2) team Meetings
Task 3 – Schematic Design
BASE will begin to develop the design of the Final Concept Design Plan into working drawing format.
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
We will initiate coordination with the consultant design team.
• Attend a project team meeting
• Review code and local jurisdictional and design criteria for improvements • Refine Final Concept Design Plan and draft Schematic Design Plan • Preliminary irrigation design
Deliverables: Schematic Design Plan
Meetings: Two (2) Team Meetings
Task 4 – Design Development
BASE will research products, develop the necessary plans, specifications, elevations, sections and details.
4.1 Materials Plans
BASE will prepare a Materials Plan identifying materials for hardscape and site amenities, including play structures and equipment for age-appropriate play yard.
4.2 Irrigation Plan
An irrigation concept will be developed to show locations of point of connection, controller, and layout and sizing of irrigation mainline. The Irrigation Plan will be designed to accommodate a fully automatic, water conserving irrigation system designed per the State Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance requirements. Preliminary water use calculations per local and State ordinance will be developed.
4.3 Planting Plans
Prepare preliminary planting plans. Proposed plants will be located and identified with both botanical and common names, plant container sizes at installation, and quantities. Native and Mediterranean drought tolerant plant species will be used as appropriate to work with the proposed high-efficient irrigation system and the storm water treatment areas.
4.4 Construction Details and Technical Specifications Outline BASE will include design development details for hardscape and site amenities, site furnishings, and planting. Landscape Specification Outline sections will be provided.
Deliverables: CAD Plans and details at Design Development Outline format of Technical Specifications
Meetings: Two (2) Team Meetings
Task 5 – Construction Documents
Prepare landscape Construction Documents for building permitting, bidding, and construction.
Drawings will be submitted to the City for review and comment. Time is included for our response to 1 set of plan check comments.
5.1 Materials Plans
BASE will refine and finalize the Materials Plans for all landscape site amenities. A materials schedule will be included, identifying selected materials, products, colors, finishes, etc.
5.2 Layout Plans
BASE will prepare a Layout Plan describing and locating pedestrian hardscape areas, playgrounds and softscape areas.
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
5.3 Irrigation Plans
BASE will provide a fully-automatic water-conserving irrigation system plan for all proposed landscape areas. Legend of equipment, standard specifications, watering schedules, and water use calculations will be included to comply with all jurisdictional and WELO requirements.
5.4 Planting Plans
Refinement of planting plans for construction. All proposed plant materials will be located and identified with both botanical and common names, plant container sizes at installation, water use ratings, and quantities. A plant schedule will be provided.
5.5 Construction Details and Technical Specifications
BASE will include construction details for site furnishings, site amenities, pedestrian hardscape, irrigation, and planting with all written three-part landscape Specification sections prepared for inclusion in the Technical Specifications manual. We assume front-end specifications will be prepared by the City.
Deliverables: 65% Construction Document plans and Technical Specifications 100% Construction Document plans and Technical Specifications Meetings: Two (2) Team Meetings
Task 6 - Bidding and Construction Observation
During this phase, BASE will provide assistance for bidding clarifications, will respond to RFIs and review landscape submittals, and perform field observations for the approved landscape Construction Documents.
6.1 Bidding Assistance
BASE can review and respond to requests for bid clarifications.
6.2 Submittals
BASE will respond as appropriate to submittals requested in the specifications and notes.
6.3 Requests for Information (RFIs)
BASE will respond to RFIs, and prepare ASI & Bulletins as needed during construction.
6.4 Construction Observance, Punch Lists and Substantial Completion After project construction, BASE can assist and observe the site installation for conformance to the approved plans. Seven (7) site visits are included: one (1) pre-bid meeting, one (1) pre-construction meeting, three (3) site visits to observe construction progress, one (1) walk thru for punch list, one (1) final walk thru. We can be available to work on an hourly basis if additional assistance is requested.
Deliverables: Site Visit Field Reports
Final Punch List
IV. BASIS OF COMPENSATION
BASE will perform the services outlined above as part of this Agreement. Services are invoiced on a percentage complete basis to the designated fee breakdown below.
Fee proposal has been submitted separately.
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
B A S E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
SAN FRANCISCO · PORTLAND · BASELANDSCAPE.COM
2023 Hourly Standard Billing Rate Schedule
Classification Standard Hourly Rate
Principal $230
Landscape Architect/Project Manager $195
Bilingual Community Outreach $200
Irrigation Designer $170
Landscape Designer $155
Translation $140
Administrative Assistant $ 95
Reimbursable expenses such as travel, mileage, and printing will be reimbursed at cost.
Fees are invoices monthly on a percent complete basis, and include reimbursable expenses. Payment terms are net 30. Invoices that are unpaid beyond 30 days of the due date of invoice will bear a service charge of 1.5% per month (18% per annum).
I. PAYMENT
Payments may be sent via check to:
BASE Landscape Architecture
EIN: 45-5154215
145 A Lower Terrace
San Francisco, CA 94114
Faithfully Submitted by: Approved by:
BASE Landscape Architecture
______________ ______________
Patricia Algara, ASLA, PLA
CA LA License 6691
Founding Principal
August 9, 2023
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED FEES:
BKF
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Schematic Design:
Role 1: Associate Principal 2 260 $520.00
Role 2: Project Manager 16 247 $3,952.00
Role 3: Senior Project Engineer 2 212 $424.00
Role 4: Project Engineer 0 186 $0.00
Role 5: Design Engineer 16 162 $2,592.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 36 1067 $7,488.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Role 1: Associate Principal 3 260 $780.00
Role 2: Project Manager 24 247 $5,928.00
Role 3: Project Engineer 8 186 $1,488.00
Role 4: Design Engineer 30 162 $4,860.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 65 855 $13,056.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Role 1: Associate Principal 2 260 $520.00
Role 2: Project Manager 30 247 $7,410.00
Role 3: Project Engineer 6 186 $1,116.00
Role 4: Design Engineer 37 162 $5,994.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 75 855 $15,040.00
Plan Check Response
Role 1: Associate Principal 260 $0.00
Role 2: Project Manager 4 247 $988.00
Role 3: Project Engineer 8 186 $1,488.00
Role 4: Design Engineer 16 162 $2,592.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 28 855 $5,068.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Role 1: Associate Principal 2 260 $520.00
Role 2: Project Manager 8 247 $1,976.00
Role 3: Project Engineer 186 $0.00
Role 4: Design Engineer 10 162 $1,620.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 20 855 $4,116.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 224 6197 $44,768.00
Optional Cost: Boundary and Topographic Survey
Survey PIC 288 2 $576.00
Survey Project Manager 247 4 $988.00
Surveying Manager 228 6 $1,368.00
Survey Party Chief 212 18 $3,816.00
Staff Surveyor 162 22 $3,564.00
Survey Chain Person 136 18 $2,448.00
Subtotal Additional Costs: 1273 70 $12,760.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 1497 6267 $57,528.00
Civil - BKF
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Schematic Design:
Role 1: Associate Principal 3 260 $780.00
Role 2: Project Manager 20 247 $4,940.00
Role 3: Senior Project Engineer 2 212 $424.00
Role 4: Project Engineer 0 186 $0.00
Role 5: Design Engineer 16 162 $2,592.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 41 1067 $8,736.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Role 1: Associate Principal 3 260 $780.00
Role 2: Project Manager 27 247 $6,669.00
Role 3: Project Engineer 10 186 $1,860.00
Role 4: Design Engineer 30 162 $4,860.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 70 855 $14,169.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Role 1: Associate Principal 2 260 $520.00
Role 2: Project Manager 32 247 $7,904.00
Role 3: Project Engineer 6 186 $1,116.00
Role 4: Design Engineer 63 162 $10,206.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 103 855 $19,746.00
Plan Check Response
Role 1: Associate Principal 260 $0.00
Role 2: Project Manager 8 247 $1,976.00
Role 3: Project Engineer 12 186 $2,232.00
Role 4: Design Engineer 24 162 $3,888.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 44 855 $8,096.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Role 1: Associate Principal 2 260 $520.00
Role 2: Project Manager 10 247 $2,470.00
Role 3: Project Engineer 186 $0.00
Role 4: Design Engineer 18 162 $2,916.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 30 855 $5,906.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 288 6197 $56,653.00
Optional Costs: Boundary and Topographic Survey
Survey PIC 288 2 $576.00
Survey Project Manager 247 4 $988.00
Surveying Manager 228 3 $684.00
Survey Party Chief 212 14 $2,968.00
Staff Surveyor 162 18 $2,916.00
Survey Chain Person 136 14 $1,904.00
Subtotal Additional Costs: 1273 55 $10,036.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 1561 6252 $66,689.00
Civil - BKF
Westborough Preschool Addition
BKF ENGINEERS
2100 Franklin Street, Suite 4C, Oakland, CA 94612 | 510.899.7300 August 4, 2023
BKF No 2023-1590
Mary Peterson
Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Transmitted Via Email
Subject: SSF West Orange Avenue Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition Project Civil Engineering and Land Surveying Proposal Dear Mary:
BKF Engineers welcomes the opportunity to submit this proposal for civil engineering land land surveying services associated with the Preschool projects located in the City of South San Francisco, California. To arrive at the estimated effort required by our office for this project, we have outlined a proposed scope of services, identified assumptions, and determined a level of effort fee based on our understanding of the project.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Based on your proposal request and information obtained from RFP, we understand the project as:
The project takes place at two separate locations in South San Francisco. The are known as the “West Orange Conversion” and “Westborough Addition” respectively.
The West Orange Conversion project involves the conversion of an existing public library building to a pre-school. This will be achieved by remodeling the interior of the existing building and installing a play structure on the site. It is assumed that the site will also need ADA upgrades (parking and path of travel) as well as a new fire service connection to the City main and backflow preventer device. The new playground will be placed at the back of the building where there is currently a small parking lot.
It is assumed that the existing ADA parking will need to be replaced and designed to current standards.
The Westborough Addition project proposes to add three portable buildings to the community center located at 2380 Galway Drive. Each of these portables will have full bathroom facilities. A new playground will be added to this site as well.
BASIS OF DESIGN
Our proposal is based on the following:
1. RFP SSF West Orange Avenue Preschool Conversion & Westborough, date July 14, 2023
2. New School Feasibility Study Prepared by SIM Architects, dated March 5, 2019
SCOPE OF SERVICES
WEST ORANGE CONVERSION
TASK 1: SCHEMATIC DESIGN/ENTITLEMENT DOCUMENTS AND SUPPORT
1. Existing Conditions Review: BKF will visit the site to review the existing site constraints and conditions.
We will note any potential challenges to development and confirm our scope of survey services to support the planning and permit processes.
2. Project Coordination: BKF will coordinate with the architect and the design team regarding design concepts and electronic data exchange associated with the Schematic Design and Entitlement Phase.
Planning documents will be based on the digital site plan and building footprints provided by the Architect.
3. Stormwater Programming: It is assumed the addition of the playground area will create enough of a disturbance to require stormwater treatment. BKF will work with the project architect to identify a preferred strategy to achieve local and state stormwater quality compliance. Stormwater treatment facilities will be conceptually programmed into the development and coordinated with the consultant team to confirm general feasibility.
4. Architectural/Development Review Documents: BKF will prepare preliminary design documents as required for the City Planning Architectural and Development Review process. The following plans will be prepared for the planning submittal:
a. Existing Site Plan – topographic survey (see optional services), existing site improvements, and record project boundary
b. Grading and Utility Plan – preliminary building finish floor and site spot finish grade elevations, preliminary drainage facilities/utility services
c. Stormwater Control Plan – BKF will prepare a stormwater control plan.
5. Meetings: BKF has budgeted up to a maximum of four (4) combined staff hours to attend meetings and participate in conference calls during the Schematic phase.
6. Submittals: We have budgeted to provide one (1) formal submittal package to the Architect for initial submittal to the City. Comments from the City will be incorporated into the DD Submittal.
TASK 2: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE
1. Coordination: Upon City Planning approvals, BKF will take ownership of the digital site plan layout and geometrics. We will coordinate with the team and verify that the proposed plan conforms to existing conditions, boundary, and site constraints. We will coordinate site utility services with the proposed building connection points along the frontages. BKF will verify, based on the available record information, if there are any identifiable conflicts between proposed and existing improvements. We will also determine during this phase if any additional survey is needed to facilitate the design process.
2. Drawings: Based on the approved site plan as developed by the architect, BKF will prepare the following documents:
• Existing Conditions
• Horizontal Control Plan
• Site Grading and Utility Plan
• Stormwater Control Plan
• Details
3. Calculations: BKF will prepare the following calculations and submit our findings in memorandum format:
• fire water hydraulics
4. NPDES C.3 Compliance: BKF will advance the preliminary stormwater control plan from the planning phase to accommodate the detailed site design and proposed site improvements. We will adjust the treatment areas and associated BMP’s to reflect a more thorough calculation process that includes the detailed site design elements.
5. Specifications: BKF will prepare technical specifications in CSI format for elements included in our scope of work. All work within the Public Right of Way will be designed in accordance with City of South San Francisco Standards.
6. Submittals: BKF will provide submittals at 100% level of completion for internal coordination and client review.
7. Meetings: BKF has budgeted for up to four (4) hours of combined staff time to attend meetings and participate in conference calls during this phase.
TASK 3: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE
1. Coordination: Based on the comments received during Design Development, BKF will prepare documents for construction. We will continue to coordinate utility systems, hardscape, landscape and site grading with the team. BKF will further progress the design to ensure that backgrounds, utility points of connection, accessible paths of travel, and stormwater treatment areas are designed and detailed to the level required by the contractor to bid and construct.
2. Drawings: We will prepare the following drawings:
• Existing Conditions
• Demolition Plan
• Horizontal Control Plan
• Grading Plan
• Utility Plan
• Stormwater Control Plan
• Construction Details
• Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan
3. Calculations: BKF will update the calculations performed during the Design Development phase to reflect the construction level design.
4. NPDES C.3 Compliance: BKF will further develop the methods to meet the NPDES requirements for postconstruction storm water discharge. BKF will work with the project architect and landscape architect to implement the site water quality features. BKF will prepare a Final Storm Water Control Report. This report will show calculations as well as site design features that will serve to treat the site stormwater.
5. Stormwater O&M Agreement: BKF will prepare an Operations and Maintenance Agreement defining the obligations of the land owner to operate and maintain the stormwater treatment facilities after construction is complete. The agreement will include details for each of the treatment facilities as well as reduced plans for the maintenance staff. We will work with the City and developer’s attorney to finalize
the negotiated agreement. We have assumed that the City will record the final document with the County.
6. Specifications: BKF will prepare final technical specifications in CSI format for elements included in our scope of work.
7. Submittals: BKF will provide Construction Document submittals at the 90% and 100% level of completion.
8. Project Approval: BKF will revise the drawings based on agency comments and re-submit for review. We have allocated fee for two (2) re-submittals to address minor comments that do not change the design of the civil improvements or site plan.
9. Meetings: BKF has budgeted for up to eight (8) hours of combined staff time to attend meetings and participate in conference calls during this phase.
TASK 4: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
1. Construction Support Services: BKF has allocated up to a maximum of twenty (20) hours of combined staff time to support the contractor and design team during the construction phase of the project.
Anticipated services include written response to requests for information (RFI’s), submittal reviews, substitution requests, informational bulletins, addendums.
WESTBOROUGH EXPANSION
TASK 1: SCHEMATIC DESIGN
1. Existing Conditions Review: BKF will visit the site to review the existing site constraints and conditions.
We will note any potential challenges to development and confirm our scope of survey services to support the planning and permit processes.
2. Project Coordination: BKF will coordinate with the architect and the design team regarding design concepts and electronic data exchange associated with the Schematic Design and Entitlement Phase.
Planning documents will be based on the digital site plan and building footprints provided by the Architect.
3. Stormwater Programming: It is assumed the addition of the playground area will create enough of a disturbance to require stormwater treatment. BKF will work with the project architect to identify a preferred strategy to achieve local and state stormwater quality compliance. Stormwater treatment facilities will be conceptually programmed into the development and coordinated with the consultant team to confirm general feasibility.
4. Architectural/Development Review Documents: BKF will prepare preliminary design documents as required for the City Planning Architectural and Development Review process. The following plans will be prepared for the planning submittal:
a. Existing Site Plan – topographic survey (see optional services), existing site improvements, and record project boundary
b. Grading and Utility Plan – preliminary building finish floor and site spot finish grade elevations, preliminary drainage facilities/utility services
c. Stormwater Control Plan – BKF will prepare a stormwater control plan.
5. Meetings: BKF has budgeted up to a maximum of four (4) combined staff hours to attend meetings and participate in conference calls during the Schematic phase.
6. Submittals: We have budgeted to provide one (1) formal submittal package to the Architect for initial submittal to the City. Comments from the City will be incorporated into the DD Submittal.
TASK 2: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE
1. Coordination: Upon City Planning approvals, BKF will take ownership of the digital site plan layout and geometrics. We will coordinate with the team and verify that the proposed plan conforms to existing conditions, boundary, and site constraints. We will coordinate site utility services with the proposed building connection points along the frontages. BKF will verify, based on the available record information, if there are any identifiable conflicts between proposed and existing improvements. We will also determine during this phase if any additional survey is needed to facilitate the design process.
2. Drawings: Based on the approved site plan as developed by the architect, BKF will prepare the following documents:
• Existing Conditions
• Horizontal Control Plan
• Site Grading and Utility Plan
• Stormwater Control Plan
• Details
3. Calculations: BKF will prepare the following calculations and submit our findings in memorandum format:
• fire water hydraulics
• sewer sizing
4. NPDES C.3 Compliance: BKF will advance the preliminary stormwater control plan from the planning phase to accommodate the detailed site design and proposed site improvements. We will adjust the treatment areas and associated BMP’s to reflect a more thorough calculation process that includes the detailed site design elements.
5. Specifications: BKF will prepare technical specifications in CSI format for elements included in our scope of work. All work within the Public Right of Way will be designed in accordance with City of South San Francisco Standards.
6. Submittals: BKF will provide submittals at 100% level of completion for internal coordination and client review.
7. Meetings: BKF has budgeted for up to four (4) hours of combined staff time to attend meetings and participate in conference calls during this phase.
TASK 3: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE
1. Coordination: Based on the comments received during Design Development, BKF will prepare documents for construction. We will continue to coordinate utility systems, hardscape, landscape and site grading with the team. BKF will further progress the design to ensure that backgrounds, utility points of connection, accessible paths of travel, and stormwater treatment areas are designed and detailed to the level required by the contractor to bid and construct.
2. Drawings: We will prepare the following drawings:
• Existing Conditions
• Demolition Plan
• Horizontal Control Plan
• Grading Plan
• Utility Plan
• Stormwater Control Plan
• Construction Details
• Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan
3. Calculations: BKF will update the calculations performed during the Design Development phase to reflect the construction level design.
4. NPDES C.3 Compliance: BKF will further develop the methods to meet the NPDES requirements for postconstruction storm water discharge. BKF will work with the project architect and landscape architect to implement the site water quality features. BKF will prepare a Final Storm Water Control Report. This report will show calculations as well as site design features that will serve to treat the site stormwater.
5. Stormwater O&M Agreement: BKF will prepare an Operations and Maintenance Agreement defining the obligations of the land owner to operate and maintain the stormwater treatment facilities after construction is complete. The agreement will include details for each of the treatment facilities as well as reduced plans for the maintenance staff. We will work with the City and developer’s attorney to finalize the negotiated agreement. We have assumed that the City will record the final document with the County.
6. Specifications: BKF will prepare final technical specifications in CSI format for elements included in our scope of work.
7. Submittals: BKF will provide Construction Document submittals at the 90% and 100% level of completion.
8. Project Approval: BKF will revise the drawings based on agency comments and re-submit for review. We have allocated fee for one (1) re-submittals to address comments that do not change the design of the civil improvements or site plan.
9. Meetings: BKF has budgeted for up to eight (8) hours of combined staff time to attend meetings and participate in conference calls during this phase.
TASK 4: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
1. Construction Support Services: BKF has allocated up to a maximum of thirty (30) hours of combined staff time to support the contractor and design team during the construction phase of the project.
Anticipated services include written response to requests for information (RFI’s), submittal reviews, substitution requests, informational bulletins, addendums.
SCOPE QUALIFICATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS
BKF Engineers’ services are limited to those expressly set forth in the scope. We understand that BKF will have no other obligations or responsibilities for the project except as provided in this proposal letter, or as otherwise agreed to in writing. BKF will provide the scope of services consistent with, and limited to, the standard of care applicable to such services. Any participation in non-adversarial procedures, or other right to repair items, is considered as additional services. For the scope of work identified, we have assumed the following:
1) Basis of Design and Site Information
a) Topographic Survey: If the optional services are not executed, a current design topographic base map at a scale of 1” =20’ using ground surveying methods will be provided prior to the start of schematic design. This survey will include the location, rim, and invert of gravity utilities and location only ‘dry’ utilities within the project area along with evidence of other buried utilities. A record boundary for the project for use in design and building permit will be part of the survey. BKF can provide this survey either directly to the Client or as an addendum to the Civil Contract if requested. b) Title Report: A current title report for the property will be provided by the owner. c) Geotechnical Report: A geotechnical report for the project will be provided. At a minimum, this report should address the required paving structural sections, earthwork and compaction recommendations, soil bearing pressures, surcharge pressures, settlement issues, soil infiltration/percolation rates, groundwater levels, and corrosion recommendations.
d) Existing Utilities: Unless otherwise indicated or provided by others, any existing utilities identified on BKF’s drawings/plans are based on information obtained by BKF, or provided to BKF, and may not be accurately documented in their horizontal location or vertical profile. Other utilities may be present that were not disclosed. BKF highly recommends that critical facilities be underground service alert (USA) located and potholed during design or prior to construction. e) Potholing: Potholing services are not included in this proposal unless specifically identified. f) Existing Utility Capacities: Unless otherwise addressed, existing utilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposed improvements, that they are adjacent to the site frontage and do not require main extensions, and that utility system capacity studies are not required. g) Site Plan: At the completion of the Design Development phase, the site plan is final and only minor alterations will be made. Any significant changes from the architect or owner may necessitate additional fees.
h) Legal Support: If requested, BKF can participate in non-adversarial procedures that would be considered as additional services.
2) Responsibilities
a) Civil Engineering Scope Items: BKF’s design tasks are limited to civil work outside of the structure(s) and utility connections 5-feet outside of the structure(s) including: site grading, non-structural concrete pavement, concrete sidewalks, concrete curbs and gutters, asphalt pavement, storm drainage, wastewater, and domestic water/fire water design. BKF will provide horizontal control for the building location relative to the project boundary.
b) Architect: The architect will be responsible for the overall site plan including accessible routes of travel, details of site accessibility signage, parking counts, site coverage calculations, trash areas/enclosures, fencing and walls. A final site plan will be provided by the Architect prior to our beginning the CD phase.
All work within the building (including any podium, porches, garages, or ramps) will be the architect’s scope of work.
c) Site Dry Utilities: All electric, gas, communications, and lighting improvements will be designed by others, unless specifically included in the civil scope of work.
d) Fire System: Certification of the fire protection system from the point of connection at the public water main to the building sprinkler system must be provided by a properly-licensed fire protection engineer or contractor.
e) Site Landscape/Irrigation: The landscape architect will provide landscape, irrigation design, and layout and details of walks, plazas, trails, entry monuments, walls, and/or fences. The architect and landscape architect will lead the design development efforts for the design, grading, and detailing of interior courtyards, plaza areas, hardscape and landscape areas. BKF will utilize the provided design intent and document the exterior site grading and drainage during the Construction Documents phase f) Structural Details: Structural calculations, design, and details for such items as reinforced concrete slabs, foundations, pads, vaults, footings, ramps, stairs, sound/site walls, and/or retaining walls will be provided by others. This includes structural design and detailing for storm water treatment elements that retain ground, parking, or buildings foundations.
g) Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP): All site HVAC, power, gas, communications, and low voltage improvements, and existing water pressures will be coordinated, designed, and documented by others. MEP will also provide preliminary fire service sizing based on the California Plumbing and Fire Code requirements and provide fire service lateral locations and sizes to BKF. h) Joint Trench Design: Services to the buildings, main extensions, and/or relocation of existing ‘dry’ utilities (gas, electric, communication, fiber, etc.) will be led by the joint trench/electrical designers unless otherwise contracted. Utility relocation/abandonment required as part of the street vacation process is assumed to be coordinated and processed by the Joint Trench Consultant. BKF will support their efforts and coordinate with the site design. Dry utilities designed by the joint trench consultant will be shown for coordination purposes only on the civil plans.
i) Lighting Design & Photometric Analysis: Lighting design and photometric analysis for the site and public roadways will be provided by others.
j) Traffic Signal Design: Design or modification of traffic signals is not currently included in our scope of work. BKF can provide these services if the City conditions these improvements to the project. k) Water Design: Proposal assumes that the project will require new water services for domestic, irrigation, and fire. We have not allocated budget to install public or private fire loops within the development or main extensions within the public right of way.
l) Mapping: We have not included time to prepare additional items not contained in the mapping scope of work. Additional mapping services such as subdivision maps, private easement documents, quit claims, ALTA’s, right of way dedications, etc. not specifically listed in this proposal are not included. m) Cost Estimating: All cost estimating will be provided by a project estimator. BKF will review the SD, DD, and CD estimates for general consistency with the plans and specifications. n) Pump Stations: Pump station design (electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and sitework) is not included in the basic scope of services. We can provide pump station design service as an additional scope item at your request.
o) Earthwork: Due to the variability in soils properties, existing site conditions, foundation types and preparation, trench, imported material and other factors, no delineation of earthwork quantities or ‘site balance’ is implied with the scope of work. Any earthwork quantities generated are solely for bonding
and permitting of the work with the local agency and must only be used as an approximate guide as to the actual earthwork and site balance.
3) CEQA, Entitlement, and Off-Site Improvements/Studies a) CEQA/EIR Consulting: Some jurisdictions allow project sponsors to provide technical studies to support the CEQA document and review by the sponsor of the administrative draft document. We have not included time for assisting in this effort. Should this be requested, we can provide a separate scope to support this effort.
4) Meetings
a) Meetings: Meetings are assumed to be held in the Bay Area or via remote conference. Meeting time requested beyond what we have budgeted is not included in this proposal. 5) Phasing, Delivery and Deliverables
a) Phasing: The project will be permitted and constructed in one phase and that construction phasing plan(s), or interim condition plans, will not be required for this project. Proposal does not include preparing and processing split construction permits for demolition, rough grading, backbone utilities, etc. b) Submittals: All submittals, and the coordination thereof, will be facilitated by the lead consultant and /or owner representative.
c) Permits: Unless otherwise specifically delineated in the scope of services, permit processing, applications, fees, and submittals to local, state, and federal agencies and utility purveyors will be provided by others.
BKF will submit to the client delineated scope deliverables for client submission to governing agencies. d) Drawings: All drawings will be prepared in AutoCAD format. We will submit copies of all drawings in both electronic and paper format.
e) Building Information Modeling (BIM): We have not included time to convert civil 3D design or existing conditions AutoCAD files into BIM model files. We have assumed all conversions will be by the architect. 6) Construction
a) Duration: We have assumed that construction will proceed immediately after design/permitting and that the duration of construction will be 24 months or less. The hours identified in the Construction Support task are based on this construction duration. Should the duration extend beyond this time, additional services will be required to complete the services related to construction support. b) Utility Location Services: BKF has not included fee to contract with an underground utility location consultant to locate private utilities within the site. c) QSD Services/Storm Water Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP): It is not anticipated either project will disturb more than an acre. It is therefore not anticipated these service will be necessary. d) QSP Services: At the request of the client BKF can provide this service as an additive alternate task, applicable to sites disturbing over one acre of land.
e) Traffic Control Plan and Construction Haul Route Plan: These will be prepared and coordinated by the Contractor. We can provide this service as an additional scope item at your request. f) Construction Staking: These services are assumed to be contracted directly with the general contractor and are not included.
g) Post Construction Survey: Preparation of post construction record documents or as-built surveys are not included.
h) Meetings: We have not included attendance at regularly scheduled construction meetings as part of the scope of services.
OPTIONAL SERVICES
OPTIONAL TASK 1: TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY (West Orange Conversion)
1. Boundary Analysis: BKF will perform a Boundary Survey and prepare a Boundary Analysis that will define the development parcel area. While performing the field work associated with the topography, BKF will conduct field research for primary monumentation to establish boundary resolution. Once the research and reconnaissance has been completed, BKF will perform a boundary determination, which includes an analysis of the assembled evidence with respect to its relationship to the title and other documentary evidence.
2. Topographic Field Survey: Simultaneous to conducting the field reconnaissance discussed above, BKF will provide the field work to prepare a complete Topographic Map for the subject property. BKF will gather available public data and plans for the site and its surrounding improvements. The topographic survey will be comprised of the following:
a. Field Survey - BKF will provide the field work to prepare a Topographic Map for the subject property.
The limits of the topographic survey will be the subject property and the fronting sidewalks along the property frontage. The topographic survey will be comprised of identified visible site features such as roadways, pavements, evidence of significant traveled ways, walls, fences, trees 9-inches and larger in diameter and visual utility infrastructure. We will obtain a succession of spot elevations to define the general terrain of the site and immediately adjacent improvements to produce mapping at a 1-foot contour interval.
b. Utilities - Utility infrastructure within the mapping limits, including sewer, water valves, hydrants, meter boxes, storm drain and marked utilities, if encountered during the course of our field survey, will also be identified. The basic routing, inverts and orientation of the on-site gravity utilities will be identified based on field evidence and any available plans provided if to BKF prior to commencement of the survey. If as-built drawings are not provided or are inconclusive when compared to the field evidence, only data at the dipped structures will be provided. Locating of underground pressure pipe and dry utilities is not included.
OPTIONAL TASK 1: TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY (Westborough Expansion)
1. Boundary Analysis: BKF will perform a Boundary Survey and prepare a Boundary Analysis that will define the development parcel area. While performing the field work associated with the topography, BKF will conduct field research for primary monumentation to establish boundary resolution. Once the research and reconnaissance has been completed, BKF will perform a boundary determination, which includes an analysis of the assembled evidence with respect to its relationship to the title and other documentary evidence.
2. Topographic Field Survey: Simultaneous to conducting the field reconnaissance discussed above, BKF will provide the field work to prepare a complete Topographic Map for the subject property. BKF will gather available public data and plans for the site and its surrounding improvements. The topographic survey will be comprised of the following:
c. Field Survey - BKF will provide the field work to prepare a Topographic Map for the subject property.
The limits of the topographic survey will be the subject property and the fronting sidewalks along the property frontage. The topographic survey will be comprised of identified visible site features such as roadways, pavements, evidence of significant traveled ways, walls, fences, trees 9-inches and larger in diameter and visual utility infrastructure. We will obtain a succession of spot elevations to define the general terrain of the site and immediately adjacent improvements to produce mapping at a 1-foot contour interval.
d. Utilities - Utility infrastructure within the mapping limits, including sewer, water valves, hydrants, meter boxes, storm drain and marked utilities, if encountered during the course of our field survey, will also be identified. The basic routing, inverts and orientation of the on-site gravity utilities will be identified based on field evidence and any available plans provided if to BKF prior to commencement of the survey. If as-built drawings are not provided or are inconclusive when compared to the field evidence, only data at the dipped structures will be provided. Locating of underground pressure pipe and dry utilities is not included.
SCHEDULE
We understand that the design phase will commence in September 2023 with target construction completion in late 2026.
COMPENSATION
1. BASE SCOPE OF WORK:
BKF proposes to provide the services on a lump sum basis. We will invoice for our services on a percent complete basis per task summarized as follows:
WEST ORANGE CONVERSION
Task Description Fee
1 Schematic Design $ 7,488
2 Design Development $ 13,056
3 Construction Documents $ 20,108
4 Construction Administration Support $ 4,116
Total Labor Fee $ 44,768
WESTBOROUGH EXPANSION
Task Description Fee
1 Schematic Design $ 8,736
2 Design Development $ 14,169
3 Construction Documents $ 27,842
4 Construction Administration Support $ 5,906
Total Labor Fee $ 56,653
In addition, please budget $1,500 for reimbursable expenses. Reimbursable expenses are anticipated for reproduction, mileage, express and messenger deliveries, and computer deliverable plots. Reimbursable expenses will be billed on a cost plus 10-percent markup basis.
2. OPTIONAL SERVICES:
At your request, BKF can provide the following optional services on a time and materials not to exceed basis in accordance with the attached rate schedule.
OPTIONAL TASK FEE
Optional Task 1 – Topographic Survey West Orange Conversion $12,800 Optional Task 2 - Topographic Survey Westborough $10,100 For tasks requested by the owner or architect not defined in this scope of services, BKF will identify them as potential extra work. We can provide a scope and fee for these items or they may be tracked separately as extra work and billed on a time and materials per our attached rate schedule.
Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. We look forward to assisting in developing this project.
Please contact me at 650-435-0013 if you have any questions regarding our scope of services.
Respectfully,
BKF Engineers
Kevin Wong, PE
Associate Principal
BKF ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RATE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2023
CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Principal $288.00
Senior Associate Principal $268.00
Associate Principal $260.00
Senior Project Manager | Senior Technical Manager $253.00 Project Manager | Technical Manager $247.00
Engineering Manager | Surveying Manager | Planning Manager $228.00
TECHNICAL STAFF
Senior Project Engineer | Senior Project Surveyor | Senior Project Planner $212.00 Project Engineer | Project Surveyor | Project Planner $186.00 Design Engineer | Staff Surveyor | Staff Planner $162.00 BIM Specialist I, II, III $162.00 - $186.00 - $212.00
Technician I, II, III, IV $154.00 - $164.00 - $180.00 - $194.00 Drafter I, II, III, IV $121.00 - $133.00 - $143.00 - $159.00 Engineering Assistant | Surveying Assistant | Planning Assistant $101.00
FIELD SURVEYING
Survey Party Chief $212.00
Instrument Person $182.00
Survey Chainperson $136.00
Utility Locator I, II, III, IV $110.00 - $156.00 - $187.00 - $213.00 Apprentice I, II, III, IV $83.00 - $112.00 - $124.00 - $132.00
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
Senior Consultant $277.00
Senior Construction Administrator $241.00
Resident Engineer $179.00
Field Engineer I, II, III $162.00 - $186.00 - $212.00
FUNDING & GRANT MANAGEMENT
Director of Funding Strategies $198.00
Funding Strategies Manager $181.00
Funding/Research Analyst I, II, III, IV $124.00 - $144.00 - $153.00 - $168.00
PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Project Coordinator $135.00
Senior Project Assistant $117.00
Project Assistant $103.00
Clerical | Administrative Assistant $87.00
Expert witness rates are available upon request.
Subject to the terms of a services agreement:
• Charges for outside services, equipment, materials, and facilities not furnished directly by BKF Engineers will be billed as reimbursable expenses at cost plus 10%. Such charges may include, but shall not be limited to: printing and reproduction services; shipping, delivery, and courier charges; subconsultant fees and expenses; agency fees; insurance; transportation on public carriers; meals and lodging; and consumable materials. • Allowable mileage will be charged at the prevailing IRS rate per mile. • Monthly invoices are due within 30 days from invoice date. Interest will be charged at 1.5% per month on past due accounts.
• The rates shown are subject to periodic increases, including January 1st of each year. BKF ENGINEERS
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED FEES:
ZFA
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 0 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 4 250 $1,000.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 4 160 $640.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 140 $0.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Programming: 8 $1,640.00
Conceptual Design:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 4 250 $1,000.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 4 160 $640.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 140 $0.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 8 $1,640.00
Schematic Design:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 2 320 $640.00
Role 2: (Principal) 10 250 $2,500.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 20 160 $3,200.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 20 140 $2,800.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 52 $9,140.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 2 320 $640.00
Role 2: (Principal) 8 250 $2,000.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 24 160 $3,840.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 44 140 $6,160.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 20 130 $2,600.00
Subtotal Design Development: 98 $15,240.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 2 320 $640.00
Role 2: (Principal) 10 250 $2,500.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 28 160 $4,480.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 50 140 $7,000.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 20 130 $2,600.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 110 $17,220.00
Construction Set:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 1 320 $320.00
Role 2: (Principal) 4 250 $1,000.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 12 160 $1,920.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 24 140 $3,360.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 8 130 $1,040.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 49 $7,640.00
Plan Check Response
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 1 250 $250.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 10 160 $1,600.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 20 140 $2,800.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 31 $4,650.00
Bid Award:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 1 250 $250.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 2 160 $320.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 140 $0.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 3 $570.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 4 250 $1,000.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 28 160 $4,480.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 50 140 $7,000.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 82 $12,480.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 441 $70,220.00
Value Engineering
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 2 320 $640.00
Role 2: (Principal) 4 250 $1,000.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 20 160 $3,200.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 24 140 $3,360.00
Subtotal Value Engineering: $8,200.00
Add-Alternates 1-3 - see tables $57,560.00
Subtotal Additional Costs: 50 870 $65,760.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 491 11870 $135,980.00
Structural - ZFA
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
Add-Alt #1 Voluntary Systemic Seismic Upgrade (Design through CA) Role 1: (Executive Principal) 8 320 $2,560.00
Role 2: (Principal) 20 250 $5,000.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 100 160 $16,000.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 120 140 $16,800.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 40 130 $5,200.00
Subtotal Add-Alt #1: 288 1000 $45,560.00
Add-Alt #2 Elevator Framing
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 2 250 $500.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 8 160 $1,280.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 20 140 $2,800.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 4 130 $520.00
Subtotal Add-Alt #2: 34 1000 $5,100.00
Add-Alt #3 Investigations
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 2 320 $640.00
Role 2: (Principal) 10 250 $2,500.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 20 160 $3,200.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 4 140 $560.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Add-Alt #3: 36 1000 $6,900.00
Structural - ZFA
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 0 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 1 250 $250.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 2 160 $320.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 140 $0.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Programming: 3 $570.00
Conceptual Design:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 1 250 $250.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 2 160 $320.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 140 $0.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 3 $570.00
Schematic Design:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 2 250 $500.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 8 160 $1,280.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 8 140 $1,120.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 18 $2,900.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 2 320 $640.00
Role 2: (Principal) 250 $0.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 8 160 $1,280.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 12 140 $1,680.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 8 130 $1,040.00
Subtotal Design Development: 30 $4,640.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 2 250 $500.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 6 160 $960.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 12 140 $1,680.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 8 130 $1,040.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 28 $4,180.00
Construction Set:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 1 250 $250.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 4 160 $640.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 6 140 $840.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 11 $1,730.00
Plan Check Response
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 1 250 $250.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 4 160 $640.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 8 140 $1,120.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 13 $2,010.00
Bid Award:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 1 250 $250.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 2 160 $320.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 140 $0.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 3 $570.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Role 1: (Executive Principal) 320 $0.00
Role 2: (Principal) 2 250 $500.00
Role 3: (Senior Engineer) 8 160 $1,280.00
Role 4: (Engineer) 10 140 $1,400.00
Role 5: (BIM Tech) 130 $0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 20 $3,180.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 129 $20,350.00
Westborough Preschool Addition
August 4, 2023
Chris Dorman
Dorman Associates
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
RE: 840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South San Francisco, CA
Structural Engineering Professional Services Proposal
Chris,
We are pleased to present our proposal for structural engineering services for the abovementioned project located at 840 West Orange Avenue and 2380 Galway Drive in South San Francisco, California. This proposal is between ZFA Structural Engineers (Consultant) and Dorman Associates (Client) and provides structural engineering services from Programming through Construction Administration and Project Closeout. Our proposed project scope is based on the RFP dated July 14, 2023.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed overall project consists of two components: 840 West Orange Preschool Conversion and Westborough Preschool Addition, as described below. 840 West Orange Preschool Conversion
This component consists of the conversion of an existing library building into a preschool at 840 West Orange Avenue, as outlined in Option 1 of the RFP. The existing building is one story above grade, and one basement level below grade, with a building footprint of 14,400 square feet. Existing drawings for the building have not been provided, and it is unknown if any exist.
Based on the previous feasibility study that was performed in March 2019, the foundation appears to be a concrete slab surrounded by retaining walls nested into the sloped site.
Concrete columns support an elevated concrete slab at the main floor. An array of square columns above the main floor supports a low-slope roof. The columns at the above ground story are likely steel, given their relative slenderness compared to the heavy round columns in the basement. The previous study states that the basement has perimeter concrete walls, which is expected, and that the upper story does not appear to have an adequate seismic resisting system. It then states that braced frames or shear walls at the outer walls may be required.
The conversion from a library to a preschool will be a change of occupancy for the building, and is expected to include an extensive tenant improvement and MEP upgrade throughout. Based on the scope, it is assumed the change of occupancy does not trigger a change in Risk Category, and that a systemic mandatory seismic upgrade may not be required. However, standard of practice for renovations of this magnitude, coupled with jurisdictions adopting mandatory seismic upgrades for this type and era of building, we recommend the building be retrofitted to meet either the CEBC (which includes a 25% force reduction) or ASCE 41-17, targeting Collapse Prevention at the BSE 1E. This decision is to be discussed with stakeholders 840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South SF, CA
2 and an elevated retrofit level may be preferred. Aside from the items listed below, the main gravity systems for the building, including the building columns, are expected to remain unaltered.
The following base structural scope for this component is anticipated and included in this proposal:
• Structural design of new openings in exterior walls to provide access to outside areas.
This is expected to trigger localized mandatory seismic upgrades where and if existing lateral components are altered.
• Structural design of new ADA ramps at the perimeter.
• Structural design of support framing and anchorage for new MEP equipment on the roof, basement, and around perimeter on new at-grade pads, for equipment over 400 lbs. • Structural design of new non-structural partitions throughout. • Structural design of new skylight openings.
• Structural design to support new cladding at exterior walls. • Structural design of minor site elements such as site retaining walls, seat walls, light posts, and foundations for pre-engineering shade structures etc.
The following Add-alternates are included as separate line items, which include efforts for design and construction administration:
• Add-alternate #1: Voluntary seismic upgrade to the aforementioned level, subject to discussion and resolution with stakeholders.
• Add-alternate #2: Structural design of new elevator support framing, if the existing elevator requires replacement or upgrade. It is assumed the existing elevator pit, and shaft dimensions, will not require modification.
• Add-alternate #3: Coordination of investigations to determine existing building framing, foundation system, and material properties. This is described further below in the schematic design scope.
Westborough Preschool Addition
This component consists of the installation of portable classrooms on the site of an existing community center located at 2380 Galway Drive. In addition to the portable classrooms, a new playground with play structures will also be added to this facility.
The following base structural scope for this component is anticipated and included in this proposal:
• Structural design of foundations and anchorage for the portable classrooms • Structural design of minor site elements such as site retaining walls, seat walls, light posts, etc.
The project budget for both project components, including hard and soft costs, is $14 million. 840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South SF, CA
3 SCOPE AND APPROACH
Our overarching approach is to provide full-service engineering with a focus on strong collaboration and coordination with all team members. The following lists the scope of services that will be provided for each phase of this project.
Programming and Conceptual Design
1. Attend virtual design meetings as required to finalize the previously completed Concept Design.
2. Provide feedback on how proposed concept(s) affect the scope of structural work.
Schematic Design (SD)
1. Attend virtual design meetings as required to validate scope and systems.
2. Attend (1) site visit to observe existing conditions and survey the existing structure.
3. Add-Alternate #3: If existing drawings are not provided, coordinate the following investigations to determine the existing building framing, foundation system, and material properties:
a) Develop a Selective Demolition Plan noting where existing finishes need to be removed to observe and verify existing framing. (Demolition to be performed by others)
b) Develop a Test Pit Plan noting where pot-holes need to be installed in order to observe and verify the existing foundations. (Test pits to be installed by others) c) Develop a Materials Testing plan noting where samples need to be taken from existing framing to determine material properties. (Testing to be completed by others)
d) Attend (1) additional site visit to take measurements and document existing structural systems.
4. Develop a Revit BIM model of the existing and proposed primary structural elements to approximately LOD 100 in accordance with AIA 202-08. This model will be coordinated at regular intervals with Revit design models provided by other design consultants on the team.
5. Prepare 100% Schematic Design Drawings from the Revit Model including foundation and framing plans.
Design Development (DD)
1. Attend virtual design meetings as required to coordinate design work.
2. Attend (1) site visit to coordinate design with existing conditions.
3. Incorporate review comments from SD submittal as required.
4. Develop primary structural elements of the Revit BIM model to approximately LOD 200 in accordance with AIA 202-08. This model will be coordinated at regular intervals with Revit design models provided by other design consultants on the team.
5. Prepare 100% Design Development Drawings from the Revit Model including foundation and framing plans with member sizing as well as general notes and typical details.
Construction Documents (CD)
1. Attend virtual design meetings as required to coordinate design work.
2. Attend (1) site visit to coordinate design with existing conditions.
3. Incorporate review comments from DD submittal as required.
4. Develop primary structural elements in the Revit BIM model to LOD 300 in accordance with AIA 202-08. This model will be coordinated at regular intervals with Revit design models provided by other design consultants on the team. 840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South SF, CA
4 5. Prepare Construction Drawings for permit submittal with fully developed framing plans and details that are coordinated with architecture, mechanical, and electrical designs.
Submit drawings at 50%CD and 100%CD (permit) milestones.
6. Prepare finalized book specifications that are coordinated with the design.
7. Provide structural calculations for permit submittal.
8. Prepare forms for structural testing and inspection for submittal.
Plan Check/Permitting
1. Respond to comments made by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Issue revised calculations and drawings as required to address comments and obtain required permits.
2. Attend a virtual meeting with the AHJ to assist with expediting the review of the building permit application as required.
Bidding and Negotiation
1. Prepare responses to questions from prospective bidders, as well as clarifications for Addenda to the Bidding Documents.
Construction Administration (CA)
1. Attend virtual construction design meetings as deemed required by the Architect.
2. Perform a total of (3) site visits to observe foundations, framing, and final structure, as required to meet the code minimum structural observation requirements. a. As part of Add-alternate #1, (4) additional site visits are included to observe the construction of the seismic retrofit scope.
3. Prepare Structural Observation Reports for each site visit made.
4. Submittal Review
a. Structural items designed by ZFA.
b. Deferred approval submittals for items designed by others to confirm loads imposed on structural members.
c. We will review each submittal no more than two times. If additional reviews are required, there will be an additional service request prior to commencement of review.
d. We will endeavor to turn around reviews in two weeks.
5. Respond to requests for information (RFIs)
a. Clarification or coordination of structural plans and details. b. Additional services will be required to review substitutions, revisions to approved structural materials and details, and to develop field fixes. c. We will endeavor to turn around responses within two days.
6. Review of testing and inspection reports provided by independent agency hired by the Owner.
7. Review and comment on change orders as deemed necessary by the Architect.
8. Provide final closeout letter when the observed completed construction is in accordance with the structural design intent.
Value Engineering
1. Provide Value-Engineering services if pricing estimates do not meet budget. Up to (50) hours of engineering time is included for this effort to update structural drawings and structural calculations.
840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South SF, CA
5 PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
General project assumptions are as follows:
1. All structural design and structural related services will be in accordance with the 2022 edition of the California Building Code and California Existing Building (CEBC). For the voluntary systemic seismic retrofit, use of either CEBC or ASCE 41 can be used as noted.
2. The project does not required review by DSA.
3. All drawings will be produced with Autodesk Revit 2022.
4. A geotechnical report will be provided with seismic design and foundation design parameters.
5. ZFA assumes that all the deliverables for this job will be electronic.
6. Any additional work outside of the Scope of Services outlined above will be billed separately in accordance with our current rate schedule included in Attachment A.
PROJECT FEE
Our fee for the above services is a Fixed Fee, itemized per phase and item in the tables below. 840 West Orange Preschool Conversion Base Fee Schedule
Phase Fee
Programming $3,280
Schematic Design $9,140
Design Development $15,240
Construction Documents $24,860
Plan Check/Permitting $4,650
Bidding $570
Construction Administration / Project Closeout $12,480
Value Engineering $8,200
Total $70,220
840 West Orange Preschool Conversion Add-alternate Fee Schedule Add-alternate Item Fee
Add-alternate #1: Voluntary Systemic Seismic Upgrade
(Design through Construction Administration) $45,560
Add-alternate #2: Elevator Framing $5,100
Add-alternate #3: Investigations $6,900
Westborough Preschool Addition Base Fee Schedule
Phase Fee
Programming $1,140
Schematic Design $2,900
Design Development $4,640
Construction Documents $5,910
Plan Check/Permitting $2,010
Bidding $570
Construction Administration / Project Closeout $3,180
Total $20,350
840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South SF, CA
6 EXCLUSIONS
This agreement does not include the following:
1. Design of temporary support systems, shoring, bracing, or construction means and methods items.
2. Major changes in the scope or design of the project as initiated by the Owner or Architect.
3. Selective demolition, installation of potholes, and material testing.
4. Attendance at weekly OAC meeting during the construction phase. ZFA can attend virtual meetings on a case-by-case basis when required.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
A draft design schedule was not provided by the Architect, however ZFA is able to complete the design phase within 6 months of notice to proceed, assuming all information is provided in a timely manner. The construction phase is not anticipated to exceed 12 months.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
This agreement includes the Terms and Conditions attached in Attachment A: Terms and Conditions.
PROJECT AUTHORIZATION
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. We have attempted to anticipate the services required to successfully complete this project. If our fee is not in accordance with what you anticipated, please contact me. Should you find this proposal acceptable, please return a signed copy of the attached Terms and Conditions document (Attachment A), along with this letter.
Thank you for providing us the opportunity to be considered to join your team.
Offered by:
ZFA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
Matt Frantz, SE
Principal
August 4, 2023
Accepted by:
DORMAN ASSOCIATES
Name: ___________________________
Title: ____________________________
Company: ________________________
Date: ____________________________
840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South SF, CA
7 ATTACHMENT A:
ZFA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. BILLINGS/PAYMENTS
Invoices will be submitted monthly for labor charges and reimbursable expenses and are due when rendered. Invoices shall be considered PAST DUE if not paid within 30 days after the invoice date and ZFA Structural Engineers may without waiving any claim or right against Client, and without liability whatsoever to the Client, terminate the performance of the service. In addition, a service charge of 1.5 percent per month on the past due principal balance may be charged. In the event any portion or all of an account remains unpaid 90 days after billing, the Client will be liable for any costs of collection if necessary, including reasonable attorney's fees plus court and related costs. All late payments will be applied first to interest, then to attorneys’ fees and costs, and lastly to principal. Visa and Mastercard payments are accepted and will be charged a convenience fee of 2.0% of the total invoice amount.
2. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Expenses other than labor charges that are directly attributed to our professional services are invoiced at our cost plus 10 percent. Reimbursable expenses typically include: 1) extra prints and reproductions, 2) special delivery (e.g. overnight) costs, 3) sub-consultants hired for the project by ZFA Structural Engineers with Client’s authorization and 4) any and all work, fees, expenses and costs that are not specifically listed and identified in the Agreement, Description, and Scope of Services.
3. SUSPENSION OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
If the Client fails to make payments when due or otherwise is in breach of this Agreement or any other Agreements Client has made with ZFA Structural Engineers, ZFA may suspend performance of all services entailed by these agreements upon five (5) calendar days’ notice to the Client. In such instances, ZFA Structural Engineers shall have no liability whatsoever to the Client for any costs or damages as a result of such suspension caused by any breach of the Agreement(s) by the Client. In such instances, ZFA Structural Engineers shall also have the right, at its sole discretion, to apply any payment(s) under any one Agreement, to the balance owed under any of the Agreements between parties. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing the obligations of the Client under any Agreement(s) with ZFA Structural Engineers, remain separate and independent obligations of the Client, and nothing herein shall be construed to invalidate any portion of any of the respective Agreement(s).
4. INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the undersigned Client shall indemnify and hold ZFA harmless from any and all actions, causes of action, damages, claims, costs, demands and expenses including attorneys’ fees, that result from injuries to and/or deaths to any and all persons, including but not limited to, ZFA and its employees, arising out of or connected in any manner with the performance or purported performance of the construction work specified or referenced in this Agreement; and for any and all destruction, including loss of use of any property, arising out of or in connection with the work specified or referenced in this Agreement, except when such actions, causes of actions, damages, claims, costs, demand, and expenses including attorneys’ fees are due to the sole active negligence of ZFA.
5. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
As to acts or failures to act occurring prior to the relevant date of Substantial Completion, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than such date of Substantial Completion.
6. TERMINATION
This agreement may be terminated by either party within five (5) days of written notice to the other in the event of a substantial failure of performance by the other party through no fault of the terminating party. If this agreement is terminated, ZFA Structural Engineers shall be paid for services performed through the termination notice date, including reimbursable expenses due.
7. EXPIRATION
This Proposal and Agreement will expire automatically within 90 days from the date this document is issued and signed by ZFA, unless accepted and signed by Client within 90 days thereof, without modification.
8. ACCESS TO SITE
Unless otherwise stated, ZFA Structural Engineers will have access to the site for activities necessary for the performance of the services.
9. HIDDEN CONDITIONS
If ZFA Structural Engineers has reason to believe that such a condition may exist, the Client shall authorize and pay for all costs associated with the investigation of such a condition and, if necessary, all costs necessary to correct said condition. If 1) the Client fails to authorize such investigation or correction after due notification, or 2) ZFA Structural Engineers has no reason to believe that such a condition exists, the Client is responsible for all risks associated with this condition, and ZFA Structural Engineers shall not be responsible for the existing condition or any resulting damage to persons or property.
840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South SF, CA
8 10. CONSTRUCTION MEANS & METHODS
ZFA Structural Engineers shall neither have control over or charge of, nor be responsible for, the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with Work, since these are solely the Contractor’s rights and responsibilities under the Contract Documents.
11. OTHER PROVISIONS
ZFA Structural Engineers will prepare drawings and specifications in a timely manner, but ZFA Structural Engineers is not responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond its control, nor by factors which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this agreement was executed. Unless a specific deadline or schedule is agreed to under the Description and Scope of Services, then all work under this Agreement shall be performed in a reasonable time as determined by ZFA Structural Engineers. If Client suspend(s) and restart(s) the work or project, ZFA will be entitled to bill Client for any remobilization and extra costs as agreed upon with client.
One or more waivers by either or both parties of any provision, part of any provision, term condition, or covenant of this agreement shall not be construed as a waiver by either party of any other provision, part of any other provision, term, condition or covenant of this agreement.
Any opinion of construction cost offered by ZFA Structural Engineers represents the judgment of a design professional and is supplied for your general guidance, but ZFA Structural Engineers does not guarantee the accuracy of its opinion as compared to actual contractor bids or actual cost to the owner.
12. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS, MODELS, AND ELECTRONIC FILES All computer analysis and building information models (BIM), drawings, plans, calculations, and specifications are instruments of service and shall remain the property of ZFA Structural Engineers, whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. They are not to be used on other projects or extensions to this project except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to ZFA Structural Engineers.
BIM model, CADD files, PDF documents, Digital Images, Scans, data, etc in any form of electronic media shall herein be referred to as “Electronic Files.” Electronic files shall not be considered to be Contract or Construction Documents.
Electronic Files do not in any way supersede or supplement the information included in the plans and specifications. Use of Electronic Files is not mandatory. Unless specifically noted in this agreement, an approved recipient, having the capability, may use the file as an added resource for conceptual understanding only. Transfer of Electronic Files is subject to all provisions of ZFA’s Indemnification Agreement for Computer-Based Information.
13. VENUE
This agreement shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The venue of any action brought to interpret or enforce any of the terms of this agreement or otherwise adjudicate the rights or liabilities of the parties hereto shall be laid in County of work.
14. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
At the discretion of ZFA Structural Engineers, all claims, counterclaims, disputes or other matters in question between the parties hereto arising out of or in relation to this Agreement or the breach thereof will be presented to non-binding mediation, subject to the parties agreeing to a mediator(s).
15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is solely for the benefit of the signatories hereto and represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties, and unless specifically referenced herein, supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or proposals, either written or oral. If any term of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement’s terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected thereby. This Agreement or any part thereof shall not be assigned or transferred by Client, without the prior consent of ZFA Structural Engineers.
16. CONTINGENT GUARANTEE
The representative of Client, who executes this Agreement, hereby represents and guarantees that Client is financially solvent and an ongoing business concern, and has the necessary resources to fulfill all obligations, including all financial obligations, of this Agreement. In the event that Client is unable to fulfill any of the obligations under this Agreement, within the timeframe called for in the Agreement or on demand, then said representative shall, on demand, be deemed personally liable to ZFA Structural Engineers, for any and all such obligations. In addition to the foregoing, during the existence of this Agreement, this contingent guarantee shall be binding on the following: as to a corporate Client, on all officers and shareholders; as to a limited liability company Client, on all members; as to any partnership Client, on all partners.
If Client or its representatives object to any of the foregoing, then Client must present to ZFA Structural Engineers at the time of execution of this Agreement, in writing, evidence of financial credit worthiness. Such evidence shall include, but not be limited to: current Dun & Bradstreet Report, current annual and quarterly Financial Statements, a current Credit Line Statement, current list of ongoing construction projects, and the last three banking statements for Client. 840 West Orange Ave Preschool Conversion & Westborough Preschool Addition South SF, CA
9 17. PROJECT INFORMATION
Upon execution of this Agreement by Client, Client will provide ZFA Structural Engineers, the physical address and legal description of the project property, and will identify by name, address and telephone number, the owner, architect, construction lender and/or surety for the project, including the reference number(s) for any loan and/or surety bond.
18. BILLING RATES
Executive Principal .........................$320.00 per hour Designer .................................$125.00 per hour Principal .........................................$250.00 per hour Project BIM Manager ..............$140.00 per hour Associate Principal .........................$200.00 per hour Senior BIM Tech .....................$130.00 per hour Senior Associate ............................$190.00 per hour BIM Technician .......................$110.00 per hour Associate........................................$180.00 per hour Engineering Support ................ $75.00 per hour Senior Engineer..............................$160.00 per hour Engineer.........................................$140.00 per hour
19. LIMIT OF LIABILITY
Neither ZFA Structural Engineers, their sub consultants, nor their agents or employees shall be jointly, severally, or individually liable to the Client in excess of ten times the compensation to be paid pursuant to this Agreement or fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), whichever is greater, by reason of any act or omission, sounding in tort or contract, including breach of contract, breach of warranty, or negligence.
Offered by: ZFA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
Matt Frantz
Principal
August 4, 2023
Accepted by:
Signature:
Print Name: ________________________________
Date:______________________________________
► 2023 hourly rates
Executive Principal ......................................................................................... $320 Principal ........................................................................................................ $250 Associate Principal ..........,.............................................................................. $200 Senior Associate ............................................................................................ $190 Associate....................................................................................................... $180 Senior Engineer .............................................................................................$160 Engineer........................................................................................................ $140 Engineer - Designer........................................................................................ $125 Project BIM Manager.......................................................................................$140 Senior BIM Technician .................................................................................. $130 BIM Technician............................................................................................... $110 Engineering Support........................................................................................ $75
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED FEES:
MHC
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis:
Project Manager (MEP) 4 220 $880.00
Project Engineer (MEP) 4 180 $720.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Programming: 8 400 $1,600.00
Conceptual Design:
Project Manager (MEP) 4 220 $880.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 8 180 $1,440.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 4 180 $720.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 16 580 $3,040.00
Schematic Design:
Project Manager (MEP) 18 220 $3,960.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 24 180 $4,320.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 12 180 $2,160.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 54 580 $10,440.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Project Manager (MEP) 20 220 $4,400.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 64 180 $11,520.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 32 180 $5,760.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 116 580 $21,680.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Project Manager (MEP) 9 220 $1,980.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 60 180 $10,800.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 30 180 $5,400.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 99 580 $18,180.00
Construction Set:
Project Manager (MEP) 9 220 $1,980.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 80 180 $14,400.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 40 180 $7,200.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 129 580 $23,580.00
Plan Check Response
Project Manager (MEP) 4 220 $880.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 10 180 $1,800.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 5 180 $900.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 19 580 $3,580.00
Bid Award:
Project Manager (MEP) 3 220 $660.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 3 180 $540.00
Project Engineer - Electrical 3 180 $540.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 9 580 $1,740.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Project Manager (MEP) 18 220 $3,960.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 30 180 $5,400.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 20 180 $3,600.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 68 580 $12,960.00 CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 518 5040 $96,800.00
MEP - MHC
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Schematic Design:
Project Manager (MEP) 6 220 $1,320.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 10 180 $1,800.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 5 180 $900.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 21 580 $4,020.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Project Manager (MEP) 10 220 $2,200.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 16 180 $2,880.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 8 180 $1,440.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 34 580 $6,520.00
Interior Finishes & Elevations:
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set:
Project Manager (MEP) 9 220 $1,980.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 16 180 $2,880.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 8 180 $1,440.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 33 580 $6,300.00
Construction Set:
Project Manager (MEP) 12 220 $2,640.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 16 180 $2,880.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 8 180 $1,440.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 36 580 $6,960.00
Plan Check Response
Project Manager (MEP) 2 220 $440.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 6 180 $1,080.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 4 180 $720.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 12 580 $2,240.00
Bid Award:
Project Manager (MEP) 2 220 $440.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 2 180 $360.00
Project Engineer - Electrical 2 180 $360.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 6 580 $1,160.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Project Manager (MEP) 12 220 $2,640.00
Project Engineer - Mechanical, Plumbing 16 180 $2,880.00 Project Engineer - Electrical 8 180 $1,440.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 36 580 $6,960.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 178 4060 $34,160.00
NOTE:
(3) Portable Buildings
- Site utilities (water, power, sewer) hook ups
- Portable buildings are pre-fab, pre-wired, with AC and distribution - Portable buidling shop drawings are available for design coordination. - Exclude PG&E service upgrade
MEP - MHC
Westborough Preschool Addition
\\fileserver\Project File Server\MEC Projects\Project Proposals\Proposals 2023\840 W Orange Ave - SSF - #M23-164.doc 1 of 3 August 8, 2023 Job No. M23-164
Mary Peterson
Dorman Associates, Inc
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
RE: 840 W Orange Ave, South San Francisco – Engineering Proposal Dear Ms. Peterson,
Pursuant to your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing engineering services for the subject project. It is understood the existing library will be converted into a licensed preschool program administered by the City’s Parks and Recreation Department. The existing structure is approximately 14,400 SF and is located on a roughly 1.5-acre parcel. Our work scope and service fee are described as follows:
Work Scope:
Mechanical (HVAC):
- Site survey of existing mechanical system
- Review available as-built drawings
- Space heating, cooling, and ventilation system design o Heating and cooling load calculations
o Reuse, modify, and/or replace existing HVAC system
o Zoning and air distribution
o Restroom exhaust system
o Utility room ventilation system
- Provide SD/DD/Permit/CD documents
- Provide response to questions during bid
Plumbing:
- Site survey of existing plumbing system
- Review available as-built drawings
- Review plumbing fixtures specifications provided by the Architect - Plumbing waste and vent system design
- Domestic hot and cold water system design
- Natural gas distribution system design
- Provide SD/DD/Permit/CD documents
- Provide response to questions during bid
Electrical:
- Site survey of existing building electrical system
- Review available as-built drawings
- Provide electrical load estimate
- Provide system single line diagram
- Coordinate new main switchboard layout with the Architect - Power circuiting per power and signal drawings by the Architect - Power circuiting per lighting fixture layout and schedule by the Architect - Power circuiting for mechanical and plumbing equipment - Coordinate emergency light and exit sign requirement with the Architect - Provide SD/DD/Permit/CD documents
- Provide response to questions during bid
840 W. Orange Ave – SSF
\\fileserver\Project File Server\MEC Projects\Project Proposals\Proposals 2023\840 W Orange Ave - SSF - #M23-164.doc 2 of 3 Compensation:
Schematic
Design
Design
Development
Construction
Document
Construction
Support c
Total (per
trade)
Mechanical
(HVAC) $5,800.00 $8,500.00 $18,000.00 $4,800.00 $37,100.00 Plumbing $3,480.00 $4,680.00 $11,080.00 $3,360.00 $22,600.00 Electrical $5,800.00 $8,500.00 $18,000.00 $4,800.00 $37,100.00 Total (per
phase) $15,080.00 $21,680.00 $47,080.00 $12,960.00 $96,800.00 Qualifications:
a. Architectural floor plan and reflected ceiling plans in AutoCAD® format will be provided for our design work.
b. Time and Material (T&M) billing per current fee schedule attached. c. Construction support includes review shop drawing, review product submittal, respond to RFI, and site visit during.
d. Reproduction and/or delivery fees will be reimbursable per the current fee schedule attached. “Printing & Delivery” cost estimate is $800.00.
e. Service(s) not mentioned above will be considered additional services and will be billed on time and material basis (T&M) per current fee schedule attached. f. Owner will pay all work in progress if project is cancelled before completion. g. Exclusions:
Construction cost estimate, LEED certifications/GreenPoint Rated applications, low voltage (IT, security, data) system design, Title-24 energy compliance calculations, PG&E electric service upgrade design and application, and production of as-built and shop drawings. h. Client may terminate this Agreement with seven days’ prior written notice to MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc. for convenience or cause. MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc. may terminate this Agreement for cause with seven days’ prior written notice to the Client. Failure of Client to make payments when due shall be cause for suspension of services or, ultimately, termination, unless and until MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc. has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses, and other related charges.
i. Client and MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc. each agree to indemnify and hold the other harmless, and their respective officers, employees, and representatives, from and against liability for all claims, losses, damages, and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, to the extent such claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by the indemnifying party’s negligent acts, errors, and omissions. In the event claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of the Client and MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc., they shall be borne by each party in proportion to its negligence.
840 W. Orange Ave – SSF
\\fileserver\Project File Server\MEC Projects\Project Proposals\Proposals 2023\840 W Orange Ave - SSF - #M23-164.doc 3 of 3 We are prepared to begin immediately upon your authorization below. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Yours truly,
Toby Siu-Ki Lee, P.E.
Associate Principal
________________________________________________
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
________________________________________________ Date: ________________________ Name & Title (print)
SCHEDULE OF FEES:
Principal $ 300.00/hr
Associate Principal $ 240.00/hr
Project Manager $ 220.00/hr
Project Lead $ 200.00/hr
Project Engineer $ 180.00/hr
Associate Engineer $ 160.00/hr
Drafter $ 120.00/hr
Administrative $ 90.00/hr
EXPENSES:
Automobile @ 0.58 dollars per mile (Out of 30 mile radius from SF) Domestic Travel
- Per diem for meals and miscellaneous - $ 50.00 per day - Lodging and common carrier at cost
Reimbursable at our cost including:
- Reproduction and Photos
- Delivery/Messenger Service
- Long Distance Telephone
- Special Sub-Consultant, Equipment and Material
In House Plotting Cost:
- Bond $8.00 each – (Plots - 36” x 24”) and (Plots – 30” x 42”) - Bond $8.00 each – Half size (Plots - 36” x 24”) and (Plots – 30” x 42”) In House Data USB Memory Stick: $ 15.00 each
Accepted Forms of Payment:
Cash, Check, ACH, Zelle
All payments expected Net 30.
For cash, ACH, Zelle, or to establish a monthly payment plan, please contact [email protected] for details.
Updated Fee Schedule, Effective as of August 10, 2022
\\fileserver\Project File Server\MEC Projects\Project Proposals\Proposals 2023\Westborough Preschool Addition - SSF - #M23-165.doc 1 of 2 August 8, 2023 Job No. M23-165
Mary Peterson
Dorman Associates, Inc
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
RE: Westborough Preschool Addition, South San Francisco – Engineering Proposal Dear Ms. Peterson,
Pursuant to your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for electrical and plumbing engineering services for the subject project. It is understood three (3) new relocatable classroom buildings will be added to the existing pre-school. The new structures will be located on the same site as the community center. Our work scope and service fee are described as follows:
Work Scope:
Plumbing:
- Review prefab portable building shop drawings
- Coordinate point-of-connection to domestic water and sanitary sewer - Review available as-built drawings
- Plumbing waste connection design
- Domestic cold water connection design
- Provide permit and construction documents
- Provide response to questions during bid
Electrical:
- Review prefab portable building shop drawings
- Site survey of existing building electrical system
- Review available as-built drawings
- Provide electrical load estimate
- Provide partial system single line diagram
- Power distribution to new portable buildings
- Provide permit and construction documents
- Provide response to questions during bid
Compensation:
Schematic
Design
Design
Development
Construction
Document
Construction
Support c
Total (per
trade)
Plumbing $2,000.00 $3,020.00 $8,000.00 $3,000.00 $16,020.00 Electrical $2,020.00 $3,500.00 $8,660.00 $3,960.00 $18,140.00 Total (per phase) $4,020.00 $6,520.00 $16,660.00 $6,960.00 $34,160.00 Qualifications:
a. Architectural floor plan and reflected ceiling plans in AutoCAD® format will be provided for our design work.
b. Time and Material (T&M) billing per current fee schedule attached. c. Construction support includes review shop drawing, review product submittal, respond to RFI, and site visit during.
d. Portable buildings prefabricated, pre-wired, and installed with air-conditioning and related air distribution. Shop drawings will be provided for our work.
Westborough Preschool Remodel – SSF
\\fileserver\Project File Server\MEC Projects\Project Proposals\Proposals 2023\Westborough Preschool Addition - SSF - #M23-165.doc 2 of 2 e. Reproduction and/or delivery fees will be reimbursable per the current fee schedule attached. “Printing & Delivery” cost estimate is $500.00.
f. Service(s) not mentioned above will be considered additional services and will be billed on a time and material basis (T&M) per current fee schedule attached. g. Owner will pay all work in progress if project is cancelled before completion. h. Exclusions:
Construction cost estimate, LEED certifications/GreenPoint Rated applications, low voltage (IT, security, data) system design, Title-24 energy compliance calculations, PG&E electric service upgrade design and application, and production of as-built and shop drawings. i. Client may terminate this Agreement with seven days’ prior written notice to MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc. for convenience or cause. MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc. may terminate this Agreement for cause with seven days’ prior written notice to the Client. Failure of Client to make payments when due shall be cause for suspension of services or, ultimately, termination, unless and until MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc. has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses, and other related charges.
j. Client and MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc. each agree to indemnify and hold the other harmless, and their respective officers, employees, and representatives, from and against liability for all claims, losses, damages, and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, to the extent such claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by the indemnifying party’s negligent acts, errors, and omissions. In the event claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of the Client and MHC Engineering Consultants, Inc., they shall be borne by each party in proportion to its negligence.
We are prepared to begin immediately upon your authorization below. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Yours truly,
Toby Siu-Ki Lee, P.E.
Associate Principal
________________________________________________
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
________________________________________________ Date: ________________________ Name & Title (print)
SCHEDULE OF FEES:
Principal $ 300.00/hr
Associate Principal $ 240.00/hr
Project Manager $ 220.00/hr
Project Lead $ 200.00/hr
Project Engineer $ 180.00/hr
Associate Engineer $ 160.00/hr
Drafter $ 120.00/hr
Administrative $ 90.00/hr
EXPENSES:
Automobile @ 0.58 dollars per mile (Out of 30 mile radius from SF) Domestic Travel
- Per diem for meals and miscellaneous - $ 50.00 per day - Lodging and common carrier at cost
Reimbursable at our cost including:
- Reproduction and Photos
- Delivery/Messenger Service
- Long Distance Telephone
- Special Sub-Consultant, Equipment and Material
In House Plotting Cost:
- Bond $8.00 each – (Plots - 36” x 24”) and (Plots – 30” x 42”) - Bond $8.00 each – Half size (Plots - 36” x 24”) and (Plots – 30” x 42”) In House Data USB Memory Stick: $ 15.00 each
Accepted Forms of Payment:
Cash, Check, ACH, Zelle
All payments expected Net 30.
For cash, ACH, Zelle, or to establish a monthly payment plan, please contact [email protected] for details.
Updated Fee Schedule, Effective as of August 10, 2022
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED FEES:
LUMENWORKS
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Schematic Design:
Role 1: (Principal) 2.80 250 $700.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 6.22 225 $1,400.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 6.22 200 $1,400.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 15 675 $3,500.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Role 1: (Principal) 11.36 250 $2,840.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 25.24 225 $5,680.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 28.40 200 $5,680.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 65 675 $14,200.00
Construction Set:
Role 1: (Principal) 4.12 250 $1,030.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 9.16 225 $2,060.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 10.30 200 $2,060.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 24 675 $5,150.00
Bid Award:
Role 1: (Principal) 1.20 250 $300.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 2.67 225 $600.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 3 200 $600.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 7 675 $1,500.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Role 1: (Principal) 0.40 250 $100.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 0.89 225 $200.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 1 200 $200.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 2 675 $500.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 113 3375 $24,850.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 113 3375 $24,850.00
Lighting - LumenWorks
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Schematic Design:
Role 1: (Principal) 8.48 250 $2,120.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 18.84 225 $4,240.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 21.20 200 $4,240.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 49 675 $10,600.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development:
Role 1: (Principal) 23.28 250 $5,820.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 51.73 225 $11,640.00 Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 58.20 200 $11,640.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 133 675 $29,100.00
Construction Set:
Role 1: (Principal) 14.56 250 $3,640.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 32.36 225 $7,280.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 36.40 200 $7,280.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 83 675 $18,200.00
Bid Award:
Role 1: (Principal) 2.80 250 $700.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 6.22 225 $1,400.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 7.00 200 $1,400.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 16 675 $3,500.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Role 1: (Principal) 1.60 250 $400.00
Role 2: (Senior Lighting Designer) 3.56 225 $800.00
Role 3: (Lighting Designer) 4.00 200 $800.00
Role 4: $0.00
Role 5: $0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 9 675 $2,000.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 290 3375 $63,400.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 290 3375 $63,400.00
Lighting - LumenWorks
Westborough Preschool Addition
3410 Lake Shore Ave., Suite 201, Oakland, CA 94610 (510) 835-7600 www.lumenworks.com
HOURLY RATES
Thomas Skradski, Principal $250
Meenam Lee, Sr. Designer $225
Silvi Tan, Designer $185
Zheng Zhong, Designer $200
Nadine Findley, Manager, Administrative Coordinator $125 *Our Billing Rates are subject to change
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 1 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com Project Authorization
Date: August 2, 2023 Project No: 080323
Project Name: 840 W. Orange Ave. Preschool Conversion
Client: Dorman Associates, Inc.
Address: 229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Phone: 415-380-7914 Mary Peterson [email protected] LUMENWORKS, INC. is pleased to be retained on this project to perform the services as outlined below.
Work by LUMENWORKS may commence upon receipt of a signed copy of this agreement by our office and retainer fee, if applicable.
Scope of services:
See Attached Proposal Dated 8/02/2023
This agreement shall be subject to all the Terms and Conditions as shown on the last page and expressly incorporates the proposal referenced above. Please refer to this proposal and the Terms and Conditions for a complete understanding of this agreement. At the time of acceptance of this agreement, Client will pay LUMENWORKS as set forth in the attached proposal Terms and Conditions and AIA C402.
This proposal will remain valid for thirty (30) days after the date it is written, but may be withdrawn by Lumenworks at any time. If the accepted proposal has not been received in LUMENWORKS’ offices by the end of the period, its Terms and Conditions will be open for further negotiations.
This agreement is for work performed by LUMENWORKS, primarily in the City of Oakland and County of Alameda, California. The laws of the state of California shall govern in the event of any contract disputes between the parties of this agreement. This agreement shall be binding on the heirs, executors, and assigns of the parties, and shall be binding on any subsequent purchasers of the property. This agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Client and LUMENWORKS and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral.
Accepted for LUMENWORKS Accepted for Client
By: By:
THOMAS J. SKRADSKI
Date:8/02/2023 Date:
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 2 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com Lumenworks Lighting Design Process
Lumenworks Lighting Design has specialized in designing numerous similar projects for over forty years. We have developed a very effective approach to coordinating with the Design Team and implementing the highest quality of Sustainable Energy Efficient Lighting Design within the Client’s Budget. Lumenworks’ team will create a better and healthier lighting environment for your project by specifying the correct color temperatures of the lighting. Lighting and its many systems will play an important role in earning LEED credits. LEED Lighting will create healthier indoor environments.
Careful attention is paid to the Design Intents of the Owners and each of the Design Team member’s disciplines are fully incorporated into Lumenworks Lighting Design Solutions. All Phases of the Architects Design are executed in Lumenworks Design Process with an extreme attention to the coordination of the lighting layouts, lighting fixture specifications, details, and excellent communication with the team to ensure meeting the project deadlines.
Lumenworks requests a lighting fixture materials budget from the Owners and that Budget is met. If any value engineering is required, Lumenworks reselects the appropriate lighting fixtures to meet the Client’s Budget to ensure the highest quality of the Lighting Design for the project.
Lumenworks also provides a Lighting Fixture “Unit Cost” pricing for every lighting fixture type so the Owners can realize the exact cost of what they are paying for. This allows for simple changes in the lighting package or value engineering as required. This process reveals the Contractor’s markup to ensure the Owners receive the most competitive pricing for the project lighting materials.
In addition, once the lighting fixture package is approved and then ordered by the contractor, Lumenworks recommends that confirmations of those orders are sent to the owners and the Architect by the contractor. This confirms the ordering process will be on time and avoids any product delivery delays.
Lumenworks team follows both the Design Team and the Construction Team through the entire Construction Administration process to respond to all RFI’S and/or changes that may occur to avoid any project hold-ups.
Lumenworks’ Advanced Value Engineering & “Unit Cost” Pricing recently saved our Clients:
• Stanford University $412,000, below their Budget, on their recently completed Stanford California Avenue faculty housing development project
• Carmel Partners $240,000, (23.5% below their budget) on the project in Jack London Square • Greystar Homes $1,092,640, below their Budget on the Kifer Road Project • Prado Group $99,084, below their Budget on the 44-unit Condominiums located at 2240 Market Street.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 3 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com Lumenworks Value-Added Lighting Design
Lumenworks Lighting Design will make a significant difference to your project. Lumenworks is a unique, value-added resource. Good lighting design will reduce the project construction and operations costs. Here are some specific areas where this has been repeatedly demonstrated. • Technical skill can be learned, but talent cannot. Architects know that the value-added for creative design is difficult to assess and depends on the appreciation of decision-makers. However, the difference between a competent lighting design and one that brings architecture to its fullest realization, is more often felt than intellectually apparent. When these cost savings factors are put into play there are demonstrable and recognizable benefits from professional lighting design. • New scientific studies are demonstrating how lighting affects retail sales, the productivity of office workers, way finding and safety and security. Quality of light and the “look and feel” affects people on many levels. Lumenworks Lighting designers are keenly aware of these issues and the techniques demanded to achieve results. The cost of poor lighting that barely meets code is not worth the risk in areas where the "people factor" is important.
• Reducing the owner's operations costs should be a crucial part of the design decisions, and these sustainable measures often benefit the project aesthetically and practically. Lifecycle cost analysis compares the return on initial investment of different techniques or technologies. Often, costs can be reduced simply by not over-lighting a space. Over-lighting is common if the specifier uses only rote horizontal foot candle prescriptions or fails to understand the project's specific visual and task issues. Too often the specifier relies on recommendations from persons selling equipment. There are dozens of ways a professional designer can reduce costs and enhance the project. Improving the reflectance of surfaces can help reduce lighting equipment, labor and operations costs.
• Lumenworks Lighting designers can provide a design to meet an established budget, but are most helpful establishing the budget. We will select equipment from numerous manufacturers to help keep bids competitive & recommend lighting equipment or techniques to reduce installation costs. Our involvement encourages competition. However, some light fixtures are "one of a kind," in which case a price may be obtained from the manufacturer early on. Unit pricing gathered during design development can be compared to unit pricing from the bidding contractors in order to spot gross anomalies & kept the lighting material unit cost and contractor mark-ups transparent. We may recommend a distributor in order to procure additional competitive bids. Finally, we will work with the owner's rep and contractors to achieve budget objectives without sacrificing design intent. This is not successfully achieved by a contractor. • The ultimate outcome is that you want to properly illuminate this project so your company and clients will be proud and happy to live or work in a well-designed environment. Locals and outsiders in the area will be drawn to the area because of the aesthetics of the project. Employing the Lumenworks Lighting Design team will make a huge difference in the cost savings of the lighting design now and into the future. It will also ensure that the project will run seamlessly with all of the design and construction disciplines throughout the course of the project.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 4 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com Project Proposal
PROJECT NAME: 840 W. Orange Ave. Preschool Conversion
Thank you for providing Lumenworks the opportunity to present this proposal for Professional Lighting Design services for this project. We have previously worked with your team on other projects and look forward to working with you on this project.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The Project is 840 W. Orange Ave. Preschool Conversion located in South San Francisco, CA. Project is converting the existing 14,400 Sq. ft. library building to pre-school center (60 to 120 children) with a new outdoor play area (Project is on a 1.5 acre parcel).
Client requests LEED Certification to a minimum level of LEED Silver. Architect will plan to coordinate this process. Lighting and its many systems will play an important role in earning LEED credits. LEED Lighting will create healthier indoor environments. Lumenworks’ team will create a better and healthier lighting environment for the project by specifying the correct color temperatures of the lighting.
Lighting Design Services will be provided for the scope for the following:
SCOPE:
Provide Lighting Design Layouts, Lighting Fixture Specifications, Details, Photometric Studies and Coordination with Architect, Owners, Landscape Architect, Interior Designer and Electrical Engineer for (3) Design Schemes to include the following Areas:
Interior:
• 14,400 square feet of Interior Space
• Main Entrance Façade
• Classrooms
• Multi-Purpose Rooms
• Kitchen
• Restrooms
• Storage Rooms
Exterior:
• Surrounding Landscape
• Building Exterior Attached
• Outdoor Play Areas
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 5 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com SCOPE OF SERVICES:
Services will be provided in the following sequential phases:
1. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE:
This Phase will include conference call meetings with the design team to develop a design concept for each area and determine general lighting requirements for the project. The documentation produced in this phase will be sufficient for transmitting information about the Schematic Design for written approval from the Client. Budget guidelines must be established at this time.
LUMENWORKS will provide the following in the Schematic Design Phase:
a. Develop lighting design concepts provided by Landscape Architect, Architect & Owners. b. Provide (1) schematic lighting design plan in CAD.
c. Provide (1) schematic lighting fixture cut sheets.
d. Conference call meetings with client, architect, and other consultants as required.
2. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE:
After approval of schematic design, we will proceed with the Design Development Phase based on the owner’s approval and other consultant’s 100% Design Development document package.
LUMENWORKS will provide the following in the Design Development Phase:
a. Upon receipt of written approval and lighting fixture budget allowance from the Client, Lumenworks will continue developing the approved lighting design in the Design Development Phase in CAD.
b. Coordinate with architectural, structural, electrical, and mechanical design consultants. c. Provide lighting layouts in CAD and lighting fixture selections based on 100% DD architectural background CAD drawings provided by the Architect. d. Perform photometric calculations as necessary.
e. Conference call meetings with client, architect, and other consultants as required. f. Lumenworks will include (1) redesign of the lighting layouts and specifications. Any additional redesign will be billed Hourly as Directed as additional services. g. The emergency lighting paths of egress to be provided by the Architect. All emergency lighting specifications and photometry for Lumenworks’ Lighting Design Solution will be provided by Lumenworks, or Lumenworks will review the emergency lighting photometrics provided by the Electrical Engineer within Lumenworks’ scope of services. h. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Please note if the Architect, Electrical Engineer or Design Build Contractor elects to re-draw Lumenworks’ final lighting design plans, Lumenworks will need to conduct a complete review of all the re-drawn plans to verify that they are correct and ensure that the drawings communicate all of the information properly.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 6 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com SCOPE OF SERVICES: (CONTINUED)
3. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION PHASE:
a. Final lighting layout and lighting fixture schedule with cut sheets package in coordination with the construction plans provided by the Architect, Landscape Architect, Electrical Engineer, Structural Engineer, and Mechanical Design Consultant. b. Review all shop drawings of architectural lighting and provide all lighting details. c. Lumenworks will include (1) redesign of the lighting layouts and specifications. Any additional redesign will be billed Hourly as Directed as additional services. d. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: If the Construction Documentation Phase is put on hold for over 6 months and if we are required to do a restart of the project then we will be allowed to negotiate and charge an additional amount for this phase if needed.
4. BIDDING NEGOTIATIONS (VALUE ENGINEERING / SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE):
Provide one Value Engineering for owner approved Lumenworks’ Lighting Fixture Package. a. Client to provide a lighting materials budget for the Lumenworks’ Lighting Fixture Package prior to starting the Value Engineering Process.
b. Any lighting fixtures and controls that are not included in Lumenworks’ Lighting Fixture and Controls Specifications Package will not be included in the Value Engineering exercise. c. Lumenworks will verify the pricing and negotiate with the manufacturers as necessary to meet the client’s budget.
d. Provide alternate lighting fixture selections as necessary to meet the client’s budget. e. Provide one Submittal Review for the final approved Lighting Fixture Package. The Contractor is to verify the exact lighting fixture counts. No substitutions by Contractor will be allowed on the Final Lighting Fixture Package.
f. Request for any additional Value Engineering and Submittal Review of Lumenworks’ Lighting Package will be an Additional Service.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES: If the Bid / Negotiation Phase is put on hold for over 6 months and / or if we are required to do a restart of the project then we will be allowed to negotiate and charge an additional amount for this phase
5. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE:
LUMENWORKS will interpret and advise on lighting related issues as requested through the construction administration phase for all areas designed by Lumenworks. a. Interpret and advise on all lighting related issues as requested during the lighting installation.
b. Respond to all RFI’s.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 7 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com FEE AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE:
The not-to-exceed fee for the lighting design services listed are listed below. This fee is inclusive of all professional lighting design services required to complete the Scope of Services outlined above except Additional Services. If Lumenworks’ Insurance policies do not meet the owner or clients’ insurance requirements, then the owner or client will have to pay for the additional expense to meet the higher insurance requirements. Enclosed with this package is a PROJECT AUTHORIZATION we are asking you to sign and return.
We will begin work immediately after the signed copy of Lumenworks’ Project Authorization is received.
THE PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR LIGHTING DESIGN SERVICES IS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Schematic Design Phase $ 3,500
2. Design Development Phase $ 14,200
3. Construction Documentation Phase $ 5,150
4. Bidding Negotiations Phase (Value Engineering/Submittal Review Package) $ 1,500
5. Construction Administration Phase $ 500
Total $ 24,850
HOURLY RATES:
Thomas Skradski, Principal $250 (20% of the hours per phase) Meenam Lee, Sr. Designer $225 (40% of the hours per phase) Zheng Zhong, Designer $200 (40% of the hours per phase) Silvi Tan, Designer $185
CHANGES AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
Prior to exceeding the above Not-to-Exceed fee due to changes in scope or design and/or revisions requested after work in Design Development Phase has been completed, Lumenworks will notify the Architect in writing to obtain an approval on the additional fee. The changes and revisions are including:
a. Lumenworks, Inc.’s lighting design solutions will be based on IESNA (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) lighting standards unless we are informed in writing before starting work otherwise the client will have to pay for additional services. b. Please note if the Architect, Electrical Engineer, or Design Build Contractor elects to re-draw Lumenworks’ final lighting design plans, Lumenworks will need to conduct a complete review of all the re-drawn plans to verify that they are correct and ensure that the drawings communicate all of the information properly.
c. All Billing will be done in Phases or a percentage of the Phase and if the client requires fully documented hours of our work, it will be charged as an additional service.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 8 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com CHANGES AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES: (CONTINUED)
d. Redesign or value engineering of any system necessitated by changes in the architecture, landscape, interior design, or in the systems budgets after the schematics have been approved. e. Evaluation of materials, systems, or equipment not specified by LUMENWORKS or offered as a substitute in place of the specifications and recommendations of LUMENWORKS. f. Consultation on other parts of the site associated with but not part of this project. g. An extension or other major change to previously agreed upon schedules once our work has begun.
h. Special mock-up, special studies, or investigations. Custom lighting fixture design i. Construction and site observation trips exceeding the site visits and meetings listed herein. j. Any building mounted or site related signage lighting or Building Crown Façade. k. Any Lighting Control Systems, i.e. Preset Lighting Zone Controls, for any indoor or outdoor areas, building facades or any Special Interior or Exterior Event spaces.
LIMITATION AND LIABILITY:
LUMENWORKS, INC. offers these services as Consultants, not as Electrical Engineers or Architects, and is not authorized to stamp drawings. LUMENWORKS’ lighting design and documentation will require final review by the Architect, Electrical Engineer, or Contractor before being submitted for permit.
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Our attached project authorization includes the Terms and Conditions which shall govern this contract.
SUMMARY:
We will begin work upon receipt of a signed project authorization and deposit. LUMENWORKS, INC. appreciates the opportunity to offer this proposal.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 9 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com
TERMS & CONDITIONS
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
This agreement is subject to cancellation by either party at any time upon ten (10) days written notice. In the event of termination, by either party, all accrued charges for work and reimbursable expenses incurred to the date of receipt of the notice of termination, become due and immediately payable.
CHANGE ORDERS & ADDITIONAL SERVICES
1. If Client gives a directive to LUMENWORKS, INC. TO perform work, and LUMENWORKS thereafter sends a written Change Order of that directive, Then it shall be deemed that Client agrees to the terms of the Change Order, unless Client objects in writing within 10 days of mailing the Change Order.
2. If a Phase is put on hold for over 9 months and / or if we are required to do a restart of the project then we will be allowed to negotiate and charge an additional amount for this phase. If the size or scope of the project changes or other events outside control and/or responsibility of LUMENWORKS require a change in plan, design, drawings, details or specifications which necessitates the preparation of additional documents, or the making of changes in documents or work already approved or upon which work has started, LUMENWORKS shall be allowed an adjustment of any fee or expense estimate.
3. If there is fragmentation of the design scope or schedule it will require Additional Services and LUMENWORKS will be allowed to invoice for the additional time required.
PAYMENT
1. Payment for accumulated time and expenses will be submitted monthly and are due and paid for by Client within fifteen (15) days of receipt. All amounts are quoted and payable in U.S. Dollars. A service charge of 1% per month will be added to all invoices over 15 days past due.
2. If the Client objects to any statement or invoice submitted by LUMENWORKS, he will so advise LUMENWORKS in writing, giving his reasons within 21 days of receipt of such statements or invoices. If objections are not so made, the statements and/or invoices will be deemed to be accepted by Client.
3. If Client fails to pay LUMENWORKS within 15 days after receipt of LUMENWORKS’ statement or invoices, LUMENWORKS may, after giving seven (7) days written notice to the Client, suspend services under this agreement until Client's outstanding invoices, which have been accepted by Client, have been paid in full, or disputes settled and a mutually accepted payment date is determined.
4. If the Project is suspended for more than three (3) months or abandoned whole or in part, LUMENWORKS shall be paid its compensation for services performed prior to the receipt of written notice from the Client of such suspension or abandonment, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due. The amount due to LUMENWORKS as compensation for its Basic Services shall be computed as set forth under Termination of Agreement. If the Project is resumed after being suspended for more than three (3) months, LUMENWORKS’ compensation shall be subject to renegotiation. Lumenworks shall be entitled to its costs and expenses incurred as a result of a suspension of the project.
5. Client shall compensate LUMENWORKS for the cost of collection of invoices outstanding, including attorney’s fees, court costs, LUMENWORKS’ employees’ time, and other costs or expenses incurred in collection.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSE
1. LUMENWORKS shall be compensated by Client 1.0 times the direct cost of expenses incurred in connection with the Project, including:
• Additional required insurance that is beyond Lumenworks’ current insurance.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. APPROVAL: Once a recommendation has been sent, LUMENWORKS assumes it has been received, approved, and will be acted upon unless advised within (2) business days to the contrary.
2. PROJECT DELAY: Failure of the Client to properly and promptly coordinate the Work or to distribute the necessary information as needed and available, which causes delay or changes in lighting design work, through no fault of LUMENWORKS will relieve LUMENWORKS of any obligation to meet project schedule, to the extent of the delay caused by the absence of available necessary information.
3. ELECTRICAL LOADS: When maximum electrical lighting loads permitted by code are determined by others, LUMENWORKS will not commence any layouts in Phase II until written information is received defining these loads or be responsible for any delays resulting therein, nor will LUMENWORKS be responsible for or assume the cost of any re-design resulting from errors in such calculations performed by others.
4. CHANGES TO DRAWINGS: LUMENWORKS is not responsible for any changes to its final drawings and specifications unless approved by LUMENWORKS.
Changes include, but are not limited to, substitutions of and/or by manufacturers, variations in layouts, quality, and quantity of fixtures, etc.
5. ARBITRATION: Any disputed arising as a result of this agreement will be settled by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association.
Judgment upon the award will be final.
6. BANKRUPTCY: If Client files a petition in bankruptcy, or makes an assignment for the benefits of creditors, LUMENWORKS has the right to immediately stop work under this agreement, and LUMENWORKS shall be paid for any portion of work performed by LUMENWORKS, as provided above under Termination of Agreement.
7. MECHANICS LIENS: The Client is hereby notified that LUMENWORKS reserves the right to file appropriate documents with the court to maintain and support its rights under California’s Mechanics Lien Laws.
8. TITLE 24: Lumenworks does not complete Title 24 documents
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Ownership of all documents and designs crated by LUMENWORKS hereunder shall remain the exclusive property of LUMENWORKS and may be copyrighted or patented only by LUMENWORKS in its name. Drawings and specifications prepared by LUMENWORKS as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of LUMENWORKS whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. They are intended solely for the benefit of client and are not to be used by the Client on other projects or on extensions to this Project except by written agreement with LUMENWORKS and with appropriate compensation to LUMENWORKS.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
1. LUMENWORKS is not responsible for any errors, equipment failures, or delays caused by manufacturers, contractors, shippers, installers, or users; nor is LUMENWORKS responsible for a contractor’s failure to carry out the construction in a workmanlike manner or in accordance with contract documents.
2. LUMENWORKS shall not have control of or charge of and shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, fabrication, procurement, shipping, delivery, or installation, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work.
3. LUMENWORKS shall not be responsible for the acts, errors or omissions of the Client, the Owner, other Consultants, the Contractor, or any subcontractors, or any of their agents or employees, or any other persons performing any of the Work, manufacturers or shipper of equipment, or users of the Work.
4. The Client agrees to limit LUMENWORKS’ liability to the Owner and all construction contractors and subcontractors on the Project, due to LUMENWORKS’ negligent acts, errors and omissions, such that the total aggregate liability of LUMENWORKS to all those named shall not exceed LUMENWORKS total fee on the Project.
5. LUMENWORKS, INC. does not guarantee cost estimates.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 1 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com Project Authorization
Date: August 2, 2023 Project No: 080423
Project Name: Westborough Addition
Client: Dorman Associates, Inc.
Address: 229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Phone: 415-380-7914 Mary Peterson [email protected] LUMENWORKS, INC. is pleased to be retained on this project to perform the services as outlined below.
Work by LUMENWORKS may commence upon receipt of a signed copy of this agreement by our office and retainer fee, if applicable.
Scope of services:
See Attached Proposal Dated 8/02/2023
This agreement shall be subject to all the Terms and Conditions as shown on the last page and expressly incorporates the proposal referenced above. Please refer to this proposal and the Terms and Conditions for a complete understanding of this agreement. At the time of acceptance of this agreement, Client will pay LUMENWORKS as set forth in the attached proposal Terms and Conditions and AIA C402.
This proposal will remain valid for thirty (30) days after the date it is written, but may be withdrawn by Lumenworks at any time. If the accepted proposal has not been received in LUMENWORKS’ offices by the end of the period, its Terms and Conditions will be open for further negotiations.
This agreement is for work performed by LUMENWORKS, primarily in the City of Oakland and County of Alameda, California. The laws of the state of California shall govern in the event of any contract disputes between the parties of this agreement. This agreement shall be binding on the heirs, executors, and assigns of the parties, and shall be binding on any subsequent purchasers of the property. This agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Client and LUMENWORKS and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral.
Accepted for LUMENWORKS Accepted for Client
By: By:
THOMAS J. SKRADSKI
Date:8/02/2023 Date:
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 2 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com Lumenworks Lighting Design Process
Lumenworks Lighting Design has specialized in designing numerous similar projects for over forty years. We have developed a very effective approach to coordinating with the Design Team and implementing the highest quality of Sustainable Energy Efficient Lighting Design within the Client’s Budget. Lumenworks’ team will create a better and healthier lighting environment for your project by specifying the correct color temperatures of the lighting. Lighting and its many systems will play an important role in earning LEED credits. LEED Lighting will create healthier indoor environments.
Careful attention is paid to the Design Intents of the Owners and each of the Design Team member’s disciplines are fully incorporated into Lumenworks Lighting Design Solutions. All Phases of the Architects Design are executed in Lumenworks Design Process with an extreme attention to the coordination of the lighting layouts, lighting fixture specifications, details, and excellent communication with the team to ensure meeting the project deadlines.
Lumenworks requests a lighting fixture materials budget from the Owners and that Budget is met. If any value engineering is required, Lumenworks reselects the appropriate lighting fixtures to meet the Client’s Budget to ensure the highest quality of the Lighting Design for the project.
Lumenworks also provides a Lighting Fixture “Unit Cost” pricing for every lighting fixture type so the Owners can realize the exact cost of what they are paying for. This allows for simple changes in the lighting package or value engineering as required. This process reveals the Contractor’s markup to ensure the Owners receive the most competitive pricing for the project lighting materials.
In addition, once the lighting fixture package is approved and then ordered by the contractor, Lumenworks recommends that confirmations of those orders are sent to the owners and the Architect by the contractor. This confirms the ordering process will be on time and avoids any product delivery delays.
Lumenworks team follows both the Design Team and the Construction Team through the entire Construction Administration process to respond to all RFI’S and/or changes that may occur to avoid any project hold-ups.
Lumenworks’ Advanced Value Engineering & “Unit Cost” Pricing recently saved our Clients:
• Stanford University $412,000, below their Budget, on their recently completed Stanford California Avenue faculty housing development project
• Carmel Partners $240,000, (23.5% below their budget) on the project in Jack London Square • Greystar Homes $1,092,640, below their Budget on the Kifer Road Project • Prado Group $99,084, below their Budget on the 44-unit Condominiums located at 2240 Market Street.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 3 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com Lumenworks Value-Added Lighting Design
Lumenworks Lighting Design will make a significant difference to your project. Lumenworks is a unique, value-added resource. Good lighting design will reduce the project construction and operations costs. Here are some specific areas where this has been repeatedly demonstrated. • Technical skill can be learned, but talent cannot. Architects know that the value-added for creative design is difficult to assess and depends on the appreciation of decision-makers. However, the difference between a competent lighting design and one that brings architecture to its fullest realization, is more often felt than intellectually apparent. When these cost savings factors are put into play there are demonstrable and recognizable benefits from professional lighting design. • New scientific studies are demonstrating how lighting affects retail sales, the productivity of office workers, way finding and safety and security. Quality of light and the “look and feel” affects people on many levels. Lumenworks Lighting designers are keenly aware of these issues and the techniques demanded to achieve results. The cost of poor lighting that barely meets code is not worth the risk in areas where the "people factor" is important.
• Reducing the owner's operations costs should be a crucial part of the design decisions, and these sustainable measures often benefit the project aesthetically and practically. Lifecycle cost analysis compares the return on initial investment of different techniques or technologies. Often, costs can be reduced simply by not over-lighting a space. Over-lighting is common if the specifier uses only rote horizontal foot candle prescriptions or fails to understand the project's specific visual and task issues. Too often the specifier relies on recommendations from persons selling equipment. There are dozens of ways a professional designer can reduce costs and enhance the project. Improving the reflectance of surfaces can help reduce lighting equipment, labor and operations costs.
• Lumenworks Lighting designers can provide a design to meet an established budget, but are most helpful establishing the budget. We will select equipment from numerous manufacturers to help keep bids competitive & recommend lighting equipment or techniques to reduce installation costs. Our involvement encourages competition. However, some light fixtures are "one of a kind," in which case a price may be obtained from the manufacturer early on. Unit pricing gathered during design development can be compared to unit pricing from the bidding contractors in order to spot gross anomalies & kept the lighting material unit cost and contractor mark-ups transparent. We may recommend a distributor in order to procure additional competitive bids. Finally, we will work with the owner's rep and contractors to achieve budget objectives without sacrificing design intent. This is not successfully achieved by a contractor. • The ultimate outcome is that you want to properly illuminate this project so your company and clients will be proud and happy to live or work in a well-designed environment. Locals and outsiders in the area will be drawn to the area because of the aesthetics of the project. Employing the Lumenworks Lighting Design team will make a huge difference in the cost savings of the lighting design now and into the future. It will also ensure that the project will run seamlessly with all of the design and construction disciplines throughout the course of the project.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 4 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com Project Proposal
PROJECT NAME: Westborough Addition
Thank you for providing Lumenworks the opportunity to present this proposal for Professional Lighting Design services for this project. We have previously worked with your team on other projects and look forward to working with you on this project.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The Project is Westborough Addition located in South San Francisco, CA. Project is construction of a New Pre-School Building, Landscape, Parking on the site, and a new playground with play structures.
Client requests LEED Certification to a minimum level of LEED Silver. Architect will plan to coordinate this process. Lighting and its many systems will play an important role in earning LEED credits. LEED Lighting will create healthier indoor environments. Lumenworks’ team will create a better and healthier lighting environment for the project by specifying the correct color temperatures of the lighting.
Lighting Design Services will be provided for the scope for the following:
SCOPE:
Provide Lighting Design Layouts, Lighting Fixture Specifications, Details, Photometric Studies and Coordination with Architect, Owners, Landscape Architect, Interior Designer and Electrical Engineer for (4) Design Schemes for the new two-story Building to include the following Areas:
Interior:
• Classrooms
• Multi-Purpose Rooms
• Kitchen
• Restrooms
• Storage
• Garage
Exterior:
• Surrounding Landscape
• Building Exterior Attached
• Outdoor Play Areas
• Drop-off Area
• Parking
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 5 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com SCOPE OF SERVICES:
Services will be provided in the following sequential phases:
1. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE:
This Phase will include conference call meetings with the design team to develop a design concept for each area and determine general lighting requirements for the project. The documentation produced in this phase will be sufficient for transmitting information about the Schematic Design for written approval from the Client. Budget guidelines must be established at this time.
LUMENWORKS will provide the following in the Schematic Design Phase:
a. Develop lighting design concepts provided by Landscape Architect, Architect & Owners. b. Provide (1) schematic lighting design plan in CAD.
c. Provide (1) schematic lighting fixture cut sheets.
d. Conference call meetings with client, architect, and other consultants as required.
2. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE:
After approval of schematic design, we will proceed with the Design Development Phase based on the owner’s approval and other consultant’s 100% Design Development document package.
LUMENWORKS will provide the following in the Design Development Phase:
a. Upon receipt of written approval and lighting fixture budget allowance from the Client, Lumenworks will continue developing the approved lighting design in the Design Development Phase in CAD.
b. Coordinate with architectural, structural, electrical, and mechanical design consultants. c. Provide lighting layouts in CAD and lighting fixture selections based on 100% DD architectural background CAD drawings provided by the Architect. d. Perform photometric calculations as necessary.
e. Conference call meetings with client, architect, and other consultants as required. f. Lumenworks will include (1) redesign of the lighting layouts and specifications. Any additional redesign will be billed Hourly as Directed as additional services. g. The emergency lighting paths of egress to be provided by the Architect. All emergency lighting specifications and photometry for Lumenworks’ Lighting Design Solution will be provided by Lumenworks, or Lumenworks will review the emergency lighting photometrics provided by the Electrical Engineer within Lumenworks’ scope of services. h. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Please note if the Architect, Electrical Engineer or Design Build Contractor elects to re-draw Lumenworks’ final lighting design plans, Lumenworks will need to conduct a complete review of all the re-drawn plans to verify that they are correct and ensure that the drawings communicate all of the information properly.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 6 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com SCOPE OF SERVICES: (CONTINUED)
3. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION PHASE:
a. Final lighting layout and lighting fixture schedule with cut sheets package in coordination with the construction plans provided by the Architect, Landscape Architect, Electrical Engineer, Structural Engineer, and Mechanical Design Consultant. b. Review all shop drawings of architectural lighting and provide all lighting details. c. Lumenworks will include (1) redesign of the lighting layouts and specifications. Any additional redesign will be billed Hourly as Directed as additional services. d. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: If the Construction Documentation Phase is put on hold for over 6 months and if we are required to do a restart of the project then we will be allowed to negotiate and charge an additional amount for this phase if needed.
4. BIDDING NEGOTIATIONS (VALUE ENGINEERING / SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE):
Provide one Value Engineering for owner approved Lumenworks’ Lighting Fixture Package. a. Client to provide a lighting materials budget for the Lumenworks’ Lighting Fixture Package prior to starting the Value Engineering Process.
b. Any lighting fixtures and controls that are not included in Lumenworks’ Lighting Fixture and Controls Specifications Package will not be included in the Value Engineering exercise. c. Lumenworks will verify the pricing and negotiate with the manufacturers as necessary to meet the client’s budget.
d. Provide alternate lighting fixture selections as necessary to meet the client’s budget. e. Provide one Submittal Review for the final approved Lighting Fixture Package. The Contractor is to verify the exact lighting fixture counts. No substitutions by Contractor will be allowed on the Final Lighting Fixture Package.
f. Request for any additional Value Engineering and Submittal Review of Lumenworks’ Lighting Package will be an Additional Service.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES: If the Bid / Negotiation Phase is put on hold for over 6 months and / or if we are required to do a restart of the project then we will be allowed to negotiate and charge an additional amount for this phase
5. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE:
LUMENWORKS will interpret and advise on lighting related issues as requested through the construction administration phase for all areas designed by Lumenworks. a. Interpret and advise on all lighting related issues as requested during the lighting installation.
b. Respond to all RFI’s.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 7 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com FEE AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE:
The not-to-exceed fee for the lighting design services listed are listed below. This fee is inclusive of all professional lighting design services required to complete the Scope of Services outlined above except Additional Services. If Lumenworks’ Insurance policies do not meet the owner or clients’ insurance requirements, then the owner or client will have to pay for the additional expense to meet the higher insurance requirements. Enclosed with this package is a PROJECT AUTHORIZATION we are asking you to sign and return.
We will begin work immediately after the signed copy of Lumenworks’ Project Authorization is received.
THE PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR LIGHTING DESIGN SERVICES IS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Schematic Design Phase $ 10,600
2. Design Development Phase $ 29,100
3. Construction Documentation Phase $ 18,200
4. Bidding Negotiations Phase (Value Engineering/Submittal Review Package) $ 3,500
5. Construction Administration Phase $ 2,000
Total $ 63,400
HOURLY RATES:
Thomas Skradski, Principal $250 (20% of the hours per phase) Meenam Lee, Sr. Designer $225 (40% of the hours per phase) Zheng Zhong, Designer $200 (40% of the hours per phase) Silvi Tan, Designer $185
CHANGES AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
Prior to exceeding the above Not-to-Exceed fee due to changes in scope or design and/or revisions requested after work in Design Development Phase has been completed, Lumenworks will notify the Architect in writing to obtain an approval on the additional fee. The changes and revisions are including:
a. Lumenworks, Inc.’s lighting design solutions will be based on IESNA (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) lighting standards unless we are informed in writing before starting work otherwise the client will have to pay for additional services. b. Please note if the Architect, Electrical Engineer, or Design Build Contractor elects to re-draw Lumenworks’ final lighting design plans, Lumenworks will need to conduct a complete review of all the re-drawn plans to verify that they are correct and ensure that the drawings communicate all of the information properly.
c. All Billing will be done in Phases or a percentage of the Phase and if the client requires fully documented hours of our work, it will be charged as an additional service.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 8 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com CHANGES AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES: (CONTINUED)
d. Redesign or value engineering of any system necessitated by changes in the architecture, landscape, interior design, or in the systems budgets after the schematics have been approved. e. Evaluation of materials, systems, or equipment not specified by LUMENWORKS or offered as a substitute in place of the specifications and recommendations of LUMENWORKS. f. Consultation on other parts of the site associated with but not part of this project. g. An extension or other major change to previously agreed upon schedules once our work has begun.
h. Special mock-ups, special studies, or investigations. Custom lighting fixture design i. Construction and site observation trips exceeding the site visits and meetings listed herein. j. Any building mounted or site related signage lighting or Building Crown Façade. k. Any Lighting Control Systems, i.e. Preset Lighting Zone Controls, for any indoor or outdoor areas, building facades or any Special Interior or Exterior Event spaces.
LIMITATION AND LIABILITY:
LUMENWORKS, INC. offers these services as Consultants, not as Electrical Engineers or Architects, and is not authorized to stamp drawings. LUMENWORKS’ lighting design and documentation will require final review by the Architect, Electrical Engineer, or Contractor before being submitted for permit.
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Our attached project authorization includes the Terms and Conditions which shall govern this contract.
SUMMARY:
We will begin work upon receipt of a signed project authorization and deposit. LUMENWORKS, INC. appreciates the opportunity to offer this proposal.
Lumenworks, Inc., 1001 Sunnyhills Rd., Oakland, CA 94610 August 2, 2023 (510) 816-7600 Page 9 of 9
© 1994-2023, Lumenworks, Inc. – All Rights Reserved www.lumenworks.com
TERMS & CONDITIONS
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
This agreement is subject to cancellation by either party at any time upon ten (10) days written notice. In the event of termination, by either party, all accrued charges for work and reimbursable expenses incurred to the date of receipt of the notice of termination, become due and immediately payable.
CHANGE ORDERS & ADDITIONAL SERVICES
1. If Client gives a directive to LUMENWORKS, INC. TO perform work, and LUMENWORKS thereafter sends a written Change Order of that directive, Then it shall be deemed that Client agrees to the terms of the Change Order, unless Client objects in writing within 10 days of mailing the Change Order.
2. If a Phase is put on hold for over 9 months and / or if we are required to do a restart of the project then we will be allowed to negotiate and charge an additional amount for this phase. If the size or scope of the project changes or other events outside control and/or responsibility of LUMENWORKS require a change in plan, design, drawings, details or specifications which necessitates the preparation of additional documents, or the making of changes in documents or work already approved or upon which work has started, LUMENWORKS shall be allowed an adjustment of any fee or expense estimate.
3. If there is fragmentation of the design scope or schedule it will require Additional Services and LUMENWORKS will be allowed to invoice for the additional time required.
PAYMENT
1. Payment for accumulated time and expenses will be submitted monthly and are due and paid for by Client within fifteen (15) days of receipt. All amounts are quoted and payable in U.S. Dollars. A service charge of 1% per month will be added to all invoices over 15 days past due.
2. If the Client objects to any statement or invoice submitted by LUMENWORKS, he will so advise LUMENWORKS in writing, giving his reasons within 21 days of receipt of such statements or invoices. If objections are not so made, the statements and/or invoices will be deemed to be accepted by Client.
3. If Client fails to pay LUMENWORKS within 15 days after receipt of LUMENWORKS’ statement or invoices, LUMENWORKS may, after giving seven (7) days written notice to the Client, suspend services under this agreement until Client's outstanding invoices, which have been accepted by Client, have been paid in full, or disputes settled and a mutually accepted payment date is determined.
4. If the Project is suspended for more than three (3) months or abandoned whole or in part, LUMENWORKS shall be paid its compensation for services performed prior to the receipt of written notice from the Client of such suspension or abandonment, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due. The amount due to LUMENWORKS as compensation for its Basic Services shall be computed as set forth under Termination of Agreement. If the Project is resumed after being suspended for more than three (3) months, LUMENWORKS’ compensation shall be subject to renegotiation. Lumenworks shall be entitled to its costs and expenses incurred as a result of a suspension of the project.
5. Client shall compensate LUMENWORKS for the cost of collection of invoices outstanding, including attorney’s fees, court costs, LUMENWORKS’ employees’ time, and other costs or expenses incurred in collection.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSE
1. LUMENWORKS shall be compensated by Client 1.0 times the direct cost of expenses incurred in connection with the Project, including:
• Additional required insurance that is beyond Lumenworks’ current insurance.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. APPROVAL: Once a recommendation has been sent, LUMENWORKS assumes it has been received, approved, and will be acted upon unless advised within (2) business days to the contrary.
2. PROJECT DELAY: Failure of the Client to properly and promptly coordinate the Work or to distribute the necessary information as needed and available, which causes delay or changes in lighting design work, through no fault of LUMENWORKS will relieve LUMENWORKS of any obligation to meet project schedule, to the extent of the delay caused by the absence of available necessary information.
3. ELECTRICAL LOADS: When maximum electrical lighting loads permitted by code are determined by others, LUMENWORKS will not commence any layouts in Phase II until written information is received defining these loads or be responsible for any delays resulting therein, nor will LUMENWORKS be responsible for or assume the cost of any re-design resulting from errors in such calculations performed by others.
4. CHANGES TO DRAWINGS: LUMENWORKS is not responsible for any changes to its final drawings and specifications unless approved by LUMENWORKS.
Changes include, but are not limited to, substitutions of and/or by manufacturers, variations in layouts, quality, and quantity of fixtures, etc.
5. ARBITRATION: Any disputed arising as a result of this agreement will be settled by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association.
Judgment upon the award will be final.
6. BANKRUPTCY: If Client files a petition in bankruptcy, or makes an assignment for the benefits of creditors, LUMENWORKS has the right to immediately stop work under this agreement, and LUMENWORKS shall be paid for any portion of work performed by LUMENWORKS, as provided above under Termination of Agreement.
7. MECHANICS LIENS: The Client is hereby notified that LUMENWORKS reserves the right to file appropriate documents with the court to maintain and support its rights under California’s Mechanics Lien Laws.
8. TITLE 24: Lumenworks does not complete Title 24 documents
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Ownership of all documents and designs crated by LUMENWORKS hereunder shall remain the exclusive property of LUMENWORKS and may be copyrighted or patented only by LUMENWORKS in its name. Drawings and specifications prepared by LUMENWORKS as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of LUMENWORKS whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. They are intended solely for the benefit of client and are not to be used by the Client on other projects or on extensions to this Project except by written agreement with LUMENWORKS and with appropriate compensation to LUMENWORKS.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
1. LUMENWORKS is not responsible for any errors, equipment failures, or delays caused by manufacturers, contractors, shippers, installers, or users; nor is LUMENWORKS responsible for a contractor’s failure to carry out the construction in a workmanlike manner or in accordance with contract documents.
2. LUMENWORKS shall not have control of or charge of and shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, fabrication, procurement, shipping, delivery, or installation, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work.
3. LUMENWORKS shall not be responsible for the acts, errors or omissions of the Client, the Owner, other Consultants, the Contractor, or any subcontractors, or any of their agents or employees, or any other persons performing any of the Work, manufacturers or shipper of equipment, or users of the Work.
4. The Client agrees to limit LUMENWORKS’ liability to the Owner and all construction contractors and subcontractors on the Project, due to LUMENWORKS’ negligent acts, errors and omissions, such that the total aggregate liability of LUMENWORKS to all those named shall not exceed LUMENWORKS total fee on the Project.
5. LUMENWORKS, INC. does not guarantee cost estimates.
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED FEES:
SMITH, FAUSE & MCDONALD
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Principal-in-Charge 11.25 $210.00 $2,362.50
Engineer 1.50 $170.00 $255.00
CAD/BIM 3.00 $120.00 $360.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 16 500 $2,977.50
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Principal-in-Charge 25.50 $210.00 $5,355.00
Engineer 25.50 $170.00 $4,335.00
CAD/BIM 24.75 $120.00 $2,970.00
Subtotal Design Development: 76 500 $12,660.00
Bid Award:
Principal-in-Charge 1.50 $210.00 $315.00
Engineer 0.75 $170.00 $127.50
CAD/BIM 2.25 $120.00 $270.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 5 500 $712.50
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Principal-in-Charge 30.00 $210.00 $6,300.00
Engineer 33.00 $170.00 $5,610.00
CAD/BIM 43.50 $120.00 $5,220.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 110 $17,130.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Principal-in-Charge 8.25 $210.00 $1,732.50
Engineer 26.25 $170.00 $4,462.50
CAD/BIM 6.75 $120.00 $810.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 41 500 $7,005.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 247 $40,485.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 247 $40,485.00
Technology - Smith Fause & McDonald
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Principal-in-Charge 3.75 $210.00 $787.50
Engineer 0.50 $170.00 $85.00
CAD/BIM 1.00 $120.00 $120.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 5 500 $992.50
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Principal-in-Charge 8.50 $210.00 $1,785.00
Engineer 8.50 $170.00 $1,445.00
CAD/BIM 8.25 $120.00 $990.00
Subtotal Design Development: 25 500 $4,220.00
Bid Award:
Principal-in-Charge 0.50 $210.00 $105.00
Engineer 0.25 $170.00 $42.50
CAD/BIM 0.75 $120.00 $90.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 2 500 $237.50
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Principal-in-Charge 10.00 $210.00 $2,100.00
Engineer 11.00 $170.00 $1,870.00
CAD/BIM 14.50 $120.00 $1,740.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 110 $5,710.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Principal-in-Charge 2.75 $210.00 $577.50
Engineer 8.75 $170.00 $1,487.50
CAD/BIM 2.25 $120.00 $270.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 14 500 $2,335.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 156 $13,495.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 156 $13,495.00
Technology - Smith Fause & McDonald
Westborough Preschool Addition
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Principal-in-Charge 3.00 $210.00 $630.00
Engineer 13.50 $150.00 $2,025.00
CAD/BIM 3.75 $120.00 $450.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 20 480 $3,105.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Principal-in-Charge 6.75 $210.00 $1,417.50
Engineer 33.00 $150.00 $4,950.00
CAD/BIM 3.75 $120.00 $450.00
Subtotal Design Development: 44 480 $6,817.50
Bid Award:
Principal-in-Charge 0.00 $210.00 $0.00
Engineer 2.25 $150.00 $337.50
CAD/BIM 0.00 $120.00 $0.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 2 480 $337.50
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Principal-in-Charge 3.75 $210.00 $787.50
Engineer 39.00 $150.00 $5,850.00
CAD/BIM 3.00 $120.00 $360.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 110 $6,997.50
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Principal-in-Charge 0.00 $210.00 $0.00
Engineer 12.75 $150.00 $1,912.50
CAD/BIM 0.00 $120.00 $0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 13 480 $1,912.50
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 189 $19,170.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 189 $19,170.00
Acoustic - Smith Fause & McDonald
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Principal-in-Charge 1.00 $210.00 $210.00
Engineer 4.50 $150.00 $675.00
CAD/BIM 1.25 $120.00 $150.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 7 480 $1,035.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Principal-in-Charge 2.25 $210.00 $472.50
Engineer 11.00 $150.00 $1,650.00
CAD/BIM 1.25 $120.00 $150.00
Subtotal Design Development: 15 480 $2,272.50
Bid Award:
Principal-in-Charge 0.00 $210.00 $0.00
Engineer 0.75 $150.00 $112.50
CAD/BIM 0.00 $120.00 $0.00
Subtotal Bid Award: 1 480 $112.50
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Principal-in-Charge 1.25 $210.00 $262.50
Engineer 13.00 $150.00 $1,950.00
CAD/BIM 1.00 $120.00 $120.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 110 $2,332.50
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration:
Principal-in-Charge 0.00 $210.00 $0.00
Engineer 4.25 $150.00 $637.50
CAD/BIM 0.00 $120.00 $0.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 4 480 $637.50
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 136 $6,390.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 136 $6,390.00
Technology - Smith Fause & McDonald
Westborough Preschool Addition
PROPOSAL/CONTRACT
DATE: August 4, 2023
Smith, Fause & McDonald, Inc. ("SFMI"), a California corporaƟon, of 351 8th Street, San Francisco, California 94103, submits the following Proposal/Contract ("Proposal") to Dorman Associates, Inc. (”CLIENT”) a California CorporaƟon of 229 Flamingo Road, Mill Valley, CA 94941 (CLIENT address) provide the services described below:
Project Name ("Project") 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Project Owner ("City") City of South San Francisco
Project City South San Francisco, California
SFMI Proposed Scope Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering SFMI Project Number 2001448A
This Proposal shall remain open unƟl January 31, 2024 unless revoked or extended in wriƟng by SFMI. Upon the CLIENT's execuƟon, the terms and condiƟons of this Proposal shall form the contract between the Client and SFMI.
ARTICLE 1 - BASIS OF PROPOSAL
1.1 Documents of Record. This Proposal is based on:
a. Request for proposal (RFP) received by SFMI on July 31, 2023 from Dorman Associates, Inc. via email. Documents provided with the RFP included a copy of the City's RFP,
1.2 Project Schedule.
a. SFMI understands the Project to currently be in the SchemaƟc Design Phase. b. SFMI is prepared to proceed upon receipt of an executed copy of this Proposal/Agreement. c. SFMI's Proposal assumes that the design phase of this project will be completed within 18 months of receipt of authorizaƟon to proceed, or per the Project Schedule, whichever is sooner. SFMI's Proposal further assumes that the overall project, including Commissioning/Final CompleƟon Checkout will be completed within 40 months of receipt of authorizaƟon to proceed, or per the Project Schedule, whichever is sooner.
1.3 Summary DescripƟon of Technical Services/Systems.
a. SFMI understands that design services are required in the areas of:
1. AcousƟcal Engineering – OpƟonal AddiƟonal Service
a) Room AcousƟcs
b) Interior Sound IsolaƟon
c) Exterior Sound IsolaƟon
d) HVAC Noise & VibraƟon Control Assessment
e) Environmental Noise Impact Assessment
2. Audiovisual Systems
a) Program Room Audiovisual
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 1 of 16 2001448A b) Broadband Video DistribuƟon Systems
c) Public Address Systems
3. CommunicaƟons Engineering
a) Structured Cabling Infrastructure
4. Electronic Security Systems
b. The Scope of Services proposed for these areas is idenƟfied in ArƟcle 2. Fees and expenses for these services are presented in ArƟcle 4.
1.4 SubmiƩals/Deliverables
a. SFMI assumes that a narraƟve submiƩal is required at 100% SchemaƟc Design, and that drawing and spec submiƩals are required at 50% Design Development, 100% Design Development, 50% ConstrucƟon Documents, 90% ConstrucƟon Documents and 100% ConstrucƟon Documents.
ARTICLE 2 - BASIC SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.1 Audio-visual System Design
a. Meet jointly with the Client and City to review exisƟng/proposed facility and receive criteria from City for funcƟon of Project Audio-visual System(s). SFMI to idenƟfy image sizes appropriate to each room size, configuraƟon and use based on the criteria outlined by the City for the use of the system(s). Based on the informaƟon available to-date, SFMI assumes design of audio-visual systems for the following spaces at the “Orange” site:
1. MulƟpurpose Room
2. Conference Room
3. Digital Signage at CirculaƟon Spaces
b. Provide informaƟon to CLIENT on aspects of Audio-visual Systems impact on architectural design and space planning, including equipment casework, equipment credenza, AV equipment room and/or control room requirements (size, locaƟon, adjacencies), anƟcipated equipment rack quanƟty at each idenƟfied locaƟon, screen locaƟon, type and sizes and items in public view required to support the idenƟfied audiovisual program. Provide catalog cuts for review. c. Coordinate with CLIENT and other Design Team members as to requirements for Audio-visual Systems to be incorporated in Documents by other disciplines, including at least:
1. Architectural/Interiors:
a) PresentaƟon/InstrucƟonal Podium: Equipment enclosure, control and A/V input requirements.
b) Where used, ProjecƟon Screen integraƟon with reflected ceiling and wall elevaƟons. c) A/V Casework,
d) Backing for flat panel displays.
2. Structural: Hanging, support and seismic restraint provisions.
3. Electrical: AC main power, grounding, power condiƟoning,
4. LighƟng Design: Requirements for ambient/glare lighƟng control in vicinity of screens, and in large public spaces.
d. Provide criteria sketches for use by other disciplines of the Project Design Team. e. Prepare Audio-visual system subcontract drawings in Project standard format including at least:
1. Title/ Legend Sheet
2. Conduit, Wiring and Device floor plans, RCP's and elevaƟons of major public spaces.
3. System FuncƟonal Diagrams
4. Screen and Projector SecƟon Views
5. Equipment Rack ElevaƟons
6. Wiring Details
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 2 of 16 2001448A
7. Receptacle Panel Details
f. Provide specificaƟon SecƟon 27 41 16 – Integrated Audio-Video Systems and Equipment in project standard format.
g. Review perƟnent ConstrucƟon Documents for incorporaƟon by others of Audio-visual support requirements and coordinaƟon. Review at Progress Set intervals and prior to bid issue. Issue review memo/e-mail.
2.2 Broadband Video DistribuƟon Systems
a. Establish funcƟonal criteria jointly with CLIENT and City for scope and extent of required Broadband Video DistribuƟon Systems (MATV/CATV DistribuƟon Systems).
1. City to determine the availability of terrestrial CATV signal delivery to the facility. b. Coordinate with CLIENT and other Design Team members as to requirements for the Broadband CommunicaƟons Systems to be incorporated in Documents by other disciplines, including at least:
1. Architectural:
a) Headend communicaƟons room requirements (size, locaƟon, relaƟonship to other distribuƟon and control systems and elements)
b) Where provided with this Project, monitor locaƟons and size, support, orientaƟon, contrast and glare criteria.
c) Items in public view (monitors and support, control equipment, receptacles, plates, access panels).
2. Interiors: Finish materials in vicinity of monitors.
3. Structural: Hanging, support and restraint provisions.
4. Civil: UƟlity point of presence connecƟon route.
5. Electrical: AC main power, grounding, power condiƟoning, incorporaƟon of common power and signal conduit into Electrical Contract Documents.
6. Mechanical: Waste heat loads.
c. Provide criteria sketches for use by other disciplines of the Project Design Team. Provide catalog cuts for review.
d. Prepare Broadband CommunicaƟons Systems subcontract drawings; including at least:
1. Title/ Legend Sheet
2. Site Plan and Riser Diagram
3. Conduit, Wiring and Device Plans
4. System FuncƟonal Diagrams
5. Equipment Rack ElevaƟons
6. Wiring Details
7. Receptacle Panel Details
e. Integrate the design of this system with the design of related distribuƟon and control systems, as applies.
f. Coordinate the outside plant service connecƟon point of presence with the Project's local Cable Television uƟlity.
g. Engineer tap and amplificaƟon systems to distribute viewable pictures on standard ATSC tuner equipped monitors, or monitors provided with the City selected provider's content decrypƟon cards/set-top boxes.
h. Provide SpecificaƟon secƟon 27 41 33 - CommunicaƟons Broadband Systems in Project standard format.
i. Review perƟnent ConstrucƟon Documents for incorporaƟon of by Others of Broadband CommunicaƟons Systems support requirements and coordinaƟon. Review at Progress set intervals and prior to bid issue. Issue review memo/email or parƟcipate in project coordinaƟon conferences.
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 3 of 16 2001448A
2.3 Structured Cabling (Data/Voice CommunicaƟons Cabling Infrastructure) a. Meet jointly with the CLIENT and City to review the exisƟng/proposed facility and receive criteria from City for funcƟon of Project structured cabling systems. Receive informaƟon as to City’s exisƟng or proposed voice and data systems intended for operaƟon on the cabling infrastructure. Receive informaƟon on the City's structured cabling standards that apply to this Project. Based on informaƟon received to date, SFMI anƟcipates design of structured cabling systems conforming to current ANSI/TIA, BICSI and City of South San Francisco standard pracƟces. b. Provide informaƟon to CLIENT on aspects of Structured Cabling system impacƟng architectural design, including communicaƟon room requirements (size, locaƟon, adjacencies) and items in public view. Provide catalog cuts for review.
c. Coordinate with CLIENT and other Design Team members as to requirements for cabling system pathways and related to be incorporated in Documents by other disciplines, including at least:
1. Architecture: CommunicaƟons Rooms size, locaƟon, orientaƟon, backboard requirements.
IntegraƟon of open plan furniture systems and raised flooring, where it occurs.
2. Structural: Hanging, support and restraint provisions.
3. Electrical: AC main power, grounding, power condiƟoning at CommunicaƟons Rooms.
CoordinaƟon of communicaƟons raceway systems (designed by SFMI) with electrical power raceway routes to opƟmize distribuƟon. IntegraƟon of mulƟ-chamber/mulƟ-service (power and signal) raceway co-designed with Project Electrical Engineer into the Electrical plan set.
4. Civil: Design of joint trench faciliƟes. Design and specificaƟon of trenching, backfilling and paving. LocaƟons of exisƟng uƟliƟes and other known buried objects, coordinaƟon of trenching and cover requirements with those required by Mechanical and Electrical Systems.
5. CommunicaƟons Systems: Coordinate data/voice systems requirements for Structured Cabling Plant with system designer(s) and/or City, if not designed by SFMI under this or separate agreement.
d. WiFi PropagaƟon and Throughput Modeling and Design
1. Review the City’s goals for implementaƟon of WiFi including area(s) to be covered inside and outside the building, minimum throughput to be achieved, assumpƟons regarding occupancy and number of devices, the use of the building WiFi to provision Voice over WiFi (VoWiFi) in lieu of implemenƟng a cellular DAS system and the requirement to provide for future WiFi technologies.
2. Model the proposed architectural design using:
a) Ekahau Pro configured for the best pracƟces associated with implementaƟon of the City’s standard Wireless Access Point (WAP) make and model(s)
b) The progress building plans at the 50% CD or later stage.
3. Incorporate the idenƟfied WAO locaƟons to support the idenƟfied WAP locaƟons in the structured cabling design including Reflected Ceiling Device Plans, and where exterior coverage is required, in the site plans and building elevaƟons.
a) It is anƟcipated that the actual WAP devices will be installed outside of the General ConstrucƟon Contract by Others.
e. Coordinate entrance locaƟons with AT&T's Building Entrance Engineering (BIC) or with the City's selected CompeƟƟve Local Access Provider (CLEC).
f. Provide criteria sketches for use by other disciplines of the Project Design Team. g. Prepare structured cabling system subcontract drawings; including at least:
1. Title/ Legend Sheet
2. Site Plans and Riser Diagrams, indicaƟng outside plant conduit and cabling linking the buildings to the exisƟng campus infrastructure.
3. Conduit, Wiring and Device Floor Plans
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 4 of 16 2001448A
4. Reflected Ceiling Conduit, Wiring and Device Plans
5. CommunicaƟons Room (EF/BDF, IDF/HC) Enlarged Plan, RCP and Wall/Backboard ElevaƟons.
6. CommunicaƟons Equipment Rack ElevaƟons
7. Single Line Diagrams/FuncƟonal Block Diagrams.
8. OSP, ISP, Rack, Pathway and WAO Details, as applies
h. Provide specificaƟon secƟons as follows:
1. SecƟon 27 05 00 - Common Work Results For CommunicaƟons
2. SecƟon 27 05 26 - Grounding and Bonding for CommunicaƟons Systems
3. SecƟon 27 05 29 - Hangers and Supports for CommunicaƟons Systems
4. SecƟon 27 05 33 - Conduits and Backboxes for CommunicaƟons Systems
5. SecƟon 27 05 36 - Cable Trays for CommunicaƟons Systems
6. SecƟon 27 05 39 - Surface Raceways for CommunicaƟons Systems
7. SecƟon 27 05 43 - Underground Ducts and Raceways for CommunicaƟons Systems
8. SecƟon 27 05 48 - Noise and VibraƟon Controls for CommunicaƟons Systems
9. SecƟon 27 05 53 - IdenƟficaƟon for CommunicaƟons Systems
10. SecƟon 27 10 00 - Structured Cabling, Basic Materials and Methods
11. SecƟon 27 11 13 - CommunicaƟons Entrance ProtecƟon
12. SecƟon 27 11 16 - CommunicaƟons Cabinets, Racks, Frames and Enclosures
13. SecƟon 27 11 19 - CommunicaƟons TerminaƟon Blocks and Patch Panels
14. SecƟon 27 11 23 - CommunicaƟons Cable Management
15. SecƟon 27 11 26 - CommunicaƟons Rack Mounted Power ProtecƟon and Power Strips
16. SecƟon 27 13 00 - CommunicaƟons Interior Backbone Cabling
17. SecƟon 27 14 00 - CommunicaƟons Outside Plant Backbone Cabling
18. SecƟon 27 15 00 - CommunicaƟons Horizontal Cabling
i. Review perƟnent Contract Documents for incorporaƟon by others of Structured Cabling Systems support requirements and coordinaƟon. Review at Progress Set intervals and prior to bid issue. Issue wriƩen review comments or discuss in project team coordinaƟon calls.
2.4 Public Address System
a. Meet jointly with the CLIENT and the City to review proposed facility and receive criteria for funcƟon of Project Public Address System. Based on informaƟon received to-date SFMI anƟcipates Project requirements to include design of systems to support:
1. Speech grade public address (distributed loudspeaker) systems providing up to 3 selectable zones of distribuƟon, derived from the project telephone system and/or dedicated microphone(s) as directed by the CLIENT. It is not anƟcipated that the public address system will funcƟon as an emergency Mass NoƟficaƟon system. Where the project Code requirements require such systems to be implemented as a component of the project Fire Alarm system or similar, it is anƟcipated that such systems will be designed by Others. b. Provide informaƟon to CLIENT on aspects of Public Address systems impacƟng architectural design, including public address requirements (size, headend locaƟon, adjacencies) and items in public view.
Provide catalog cuts for review.
c. Coordinate with CLIENT and its Architectural Design Team members as to requirements for Public Address Systems to be incorporated in Documents by other disciplines, including at least:
1. Architecture: Equipment rooms for headend and distributed public address systems
2. Structural: Hanging, support and restraint provisions.
3. Electrical: AC main power, grounding, power condiƟoning.
4. Mechanical: Waste heat load dissipaƟon.
d. Provide criteria sketches for use by other disciplines of the Project Design Team.
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 5 of 16 2001448A e. Prepare Public Address System subcontract drawings in Project standard format; including at least:
1. Title/ Legend Sheet
2. Conduit, Wiring and Device Plans, indicaƟng mounƟng, aiming and orientaƟon of paging horns and speakers.
3. System FuncƟonal Diagrams
4. Equipment Rack ElevaƟons
5. Wiring Details
6. Receptacle Panel Details
f. Prepare the following SpecificaƟon SecƟons in project standard format:
1. 27 51 16 - Public Address and Mass NoƟficaƟon Systems
2.5 Electronic Security Systems - Visual Surveillance/Intrusion DetecƟon/Access Control Systems a. Meet jointly with the CLIENT and City to review exisƟng/proposed facility and receive criteria from City for the funcƟon of such systems.
1. SFMI assumes system incorporates:
a) Card readers/electronic locking systems at exterior entry doors and selected interior spaces.
b) Intercom at administraƟve entries.
c) Perimeter glass break and interior moƟon detecƟon based intrusion detecƟon. d) Door posiƟon switch monitoring at exterior doors and selected interior doors and hatches.
e) Security camera coverage of building entries/exterior facades, and selected interior spaces, connected to evidence gathering recording systems with provisions for local and remote realƟme monitoring.
2. DirecƟon as to what areas of the Project site are to be monitored/controlled and to what extent (single system/mulƟple system/overlapping coverage, etc.), as well as the proposed interacƟon between electronic security systems, physical security measures and the City’s security staff to be provided by the City with the assistance of the Architect, or to be separately idenƟfied by a Risk/Threat Assessment Report prepared by Others. SFMI to design systems in conformance with the direcƟon received through the foregoing process(es).
3. SFMI assumes that the City will procure its own intrusion detecƟon/burglar alarm panel, through its contracts with its alarm monitoring company, who will be responsible for crossconnecƟon to the intrusion detecƟon devices described above. b. Provide informaƟon to CLIENT on aspects of system impacƟng architectural design, including cameras, card readers, request to exit devices, intercoms, control room and/or closet requirements (size, locaƟon, adjacencies) and items in public view. Provide catalog cuts for review. c. Coordinate with CLIENT and other Design team members as to requirements for system to be incorporated in Documents by other disciplines, including at least:
1. Architect/Door Hardware Consultant/SpecificaƟons Writer: Division 8 Door Hardware required at electrified strikes or locks and power transfer hinges, and provisions for in-frame Door PosiƟon Switches, integraƟon of ADA operators with funcƟonality of the access control system, Security device finishes and installaƟon details, door and frame prep by the manufacturer to accept ESS devices.
2. Structural: Hanging, support and seismic restraint provisions.
3. Electrical: AC mains power, grounding, power condiƟoning. Power at Satellite closets for Alarm Panels, Door Control Panels, Door Lock Power Supplies, Exterior Camera Power Supplies, etc. Fire-life safety interƟes from the fire alarm system to the access control system.
4. Mechanical: Heat load impact of ESS panels and head-end equipment d. Provide criteria sketches for use by other disciplines of the Project Design Team.
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 6 of 16 2001448A e. Prepare Electronic Security System subcontract drawings; including at least:
1. Title/Legend Sheet
2. Electronic Security Systems Site Plan, indicaƟng Bluelight phone locaƟon(s) and outside plant ducts feeding them.
3. Conduit, Wiring and Device Plans
4. Required areas of funcƟonal camera coverage
5. System FuncƟonal Diagrams and/or Riser
6. Video Surveillance, Access Control and Alarm Monitoring Equipment Rack ElevaƟons and Closet Backboard ElevaƟons, where appropriate.
7. Details
f. Provide SpecificaƟon SecƟons as follows in Project standard format:
1. SecƟon 28 05 00 - Common Work Results for Electronic Safety and Security
2. SecƟon 28 05 13 - Conductors and Cables for Electronic Safety and Security
3. SecƟon 28 05 26 - Grounding and Bonding for Electronic Safety and Security
4. SecƟon 28 05 28 - Pathways For Electronic Safety And Security
5. SecƟon 28 13 00 - Access Control and Alarm Systems
6. SecƟon 28 23 00 - Video Surveillance
g. Review perƟnent ConstrucƟon Documents prepared by others of System for incorporaƟon of support requirements and coordinaƟon. Review at progress set intervals and prior to bid issue. Issue review memo/email.
2.6 AcousƟcal Engineering – OpƟonal AddiƟonal Service
a. Room AcousƟcs
1. Review Project Program and Preliminary Design Documents.
2. For each occupied area, recommend appropriate room acousƟc criteria such as reverberaƟon Ɵmes and the requirements for acousƟcally reflecƟve, absorpƟve and/or scaƩering surfaces to enhance the subjecƟve and objecƟve acousƟcal performance of the rooms. Align recommendaƟons with program documents, applicable ANSI/ASA and other naƟonal and insƟtuƟonal standards, including ANSI/ASA S12.60/Part 1-2010 (R2020) - AcousƟcal Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools, and LEED standards, as applies.
3. In a SchemaƟc Design AcousƟcal NarraƟve Document, recommended reverberaƟon Ɵmes for each space/space type based on the foregoing assessment and idenƟfy general approaches recommended to establish the room acousƟc environment for the types of rooms and spaces idenƟfied in the Project Program.
4. Provide recommendaƟons for realizing criteria established above. Such recommendaƟons would include generally, interior shapes, finish materials, layout, etc. Provide schemaƟc sketches, details, reports (at up to 2 iteraƟons due to design changes) and catalog cuts as required to support the Client's design of the space.
5. Provide draŌ specificaƟons for the required acousƟcal performance parameters of acousƟc materials for use by CLIENT'S specificaƟon writer.
6. Review ConstrucƟon Documents for incorporaƟon by others of Room AcousƟcs requirements and coordinaƟon. Review at progress set intervals and prior to bid issue. Issue wriƩen review comments by memo and/or email and discuss findings by telephone with the Project Architect. b. Interior Sound IsolaƟon
1. Coordinate with the CLIENT and City to establish and quanƟfy the City's expectaƟon for sound isolaƟon, including intrusion of building system noise into occupied spaces and acousƟc conflict City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 7 of 16 2001448A of simultaneous events in adjacent rooms or spaces. Align recommendaƟons with the requirements of naƟonal and insƟtuƟonal standards appropriate to the program uses.
2. Document recommended interior sound isolaƟon performance by adjacency and use, as well as approaches specific to the Project Program in a SchemaƟc Design AcousƟcal NarraƟve.
3. Provide recommendaƟons for the acousƟcal performance of interior sound isolaƟon assemblies, including sound isolaƟon doors, walls, windows, floor/ceiling assemblies and sealing methods at flanking paths. RecommendaƟons will be in the form of concept sketches, draŌ specificaƟons of required acousƟcal performance and wriƩen guidance at up to three (3) iteraƟons due to change in design. PreparaƟon of detailed bid form ConstrucƟon Documents (drawings or full specificaƟons) is not anƟcipated as a requirement of this Scope.
4. Review ConstrucƟon Documents prepared by other disciplines for incorporaƟon of Interior Sound IsolaƟon requirements and coordinaƟon. Review at progress set intervals and prior to bid issue. Issue review email/memo or parƟcipate in team coordinaƟon call to discuss. c. Exterior Sound IsolaƟon (miƟgaƟon of environmental noise impact on the project)
1. Obtain direcƟon from the City as to the City's expectaƟons for isolaƟon of building interior from remote on-site and off-site noise sources anƟcipated to generate noise impacƟng the building facade. Supplement with requirements of applicable ANSI/ASA and other naƟonal standards, insƟtuƟonal standards and/or applicable Code requirements to the extent applicable. a) Acquire relevant Code secƟons, Noise Elements, General Plan CondiƟons, CondiƟonal Use Permits, etc. from the City, Architect or AuthoriƟes Having JurisdicƟon relaƟve to required exterior noise miƟgaƟon on the site from off-site sources, as applies. b) SFMI anƟcipates that conformance with the PrescripƟve or Performance Standards of the 2022 CalGreen, 5.507.4 AcousƟcal Control is a project requirement.
2. Based on review of preliminary planning documents and available noise contours, document the anƟcipated Exterior Sound IsolaƟon performance necessary to conform with Code in a SchemaƟc Design AcousƟcal NarraƟve. Assess applicability and limitaƟon of available noise element noise contours for use in assessing the current noise environment of the project.
Preliminary assessment is subject to revision once a more comprehensive study has been completed.
3. Assess the potenƟal for building operaƟons to impact building occupants. PotenƟal current and future on-site noise generators that may impact building occupants to be considered in the assessment include HVAC noise sources including grade and roof mounted fans, chillers, cooling towers and evaporaƟve condensers.
4. Review preliminary drawing sets and establish recommended sound transmission loss/OITC criteria for the exterior facade construcƟon as required to comply with Code and recommended interior noise levels. Provide wriƩen recommendaƟon accompanied by schemaƟc details and draŌ specificaƟons to CLIENT as reasonably required for the CLIENT to implement the Exterior Sound IsolaƟon criteria in the ConstrucƟon Documents. Provide recommendaƟons where necessary regarding the need for, or impact of facade construcƟon, including exterior wall construcƟon, exterior glazing, exterior doors, roof construcƟon, facade penetraƟons and site barriers/berms on the resulƟng interior sound environment. This would include size, general construcƟon, locaƟon, orientaƟon, and composiƟon of such elements. a) RecommendaƟons to be provided in the form of concept sketches, specificaƟon of required acousƟcal performance parameters and wriƩen guidance. b) PreparaƟon of detailed bid form ConstrucƟon Documents (drawings or full specificaƟons) is not anƟcipated as a requirement of this Scope.
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 8 of 16 2001448A
5. Review ConstrucƟon Documents prepared by other disciplines for incorporaƟon of Exterior Sound IsolaƟon requirements and coordinaƟon. Review at progress set intervals and prior to bid issue. Issue review email/memo or parƟcipate in team coordinaƟon call to discuss.
6. Provide a report outlining compliance with applicable exterior sound isolaƟon code requirements referenced herein.
d. Mechanical System Noise and VibraƟon Control
1. Review City’s expectaƟons for ambient noise due to mechanical systems noise and coordinate with applicable ANSI, ASHRAE and other naƟonal standards and insƟtuƟonal standards, including ANSI/ASA S12.60/Part 1-2010 (R2020) - AcousƟcal Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools, and LEED standards, to the extent applicable.
2. Document the recommended interior background noise level to be achieved in each space in terms of ASHRAE Noise Contour levels (NC) or A-weighted dB as required by the governing standard(s) and Code. Review preliminary approaches considered for implemenƟng HVAC/plumbing systems. In a SchemaƟc Design AcousƟcal NarraƟve, provide design guidelines to the CLIENT for use by the Project Mechanical Engineer for noise control procedures to incorporate into the mechanical system design. Recommend construcƟons so as to isolate sensiƟve project areas from HVAC noise sources. Provide schemaƟc sketches of typical details.
3. Provide catalog cuts of recommended vibraƟon isolator and sound trap assemblies for reference and coordinaƟon.
4. Provide draŌ specificaƟons to CLIENT for coordinaƟon.
5. Coordinate criteria and recommendaƟons as above with CLIENT's Mechanical Engineer and Electrical Engineer so as not to compromise architectural noise isolaƟng assemblies (wall, floors, ceiling shaŌs, etc.).
6. At approximately 80% compleƟon of Contract Documents for Mechanical Systems, conduct analysis (at up to two iteraƟons due to design changes) of airborne noise due to mechanical system using ASHRAE procedure. Provide detailed recommendaƟons for system revisions as reasonably required to bring system into conformance with interior ambient noise criteria.
7. Review Mechanical Engineer’s specificaƟons for isolators, lining and sound traps (where required) and provide comments.
8. Review ConstrucƟon Documents prepared by other disciplines for incorporaƟon of Mechanical System Noise and VibraƟon Control requirements and coordinaƟon. Review at progress set intervals and prior to bid issue. Issue review email/memo or parƟcipate in team coordinaƟon call to discuss.
e. Environmental Noise Impact Studies (impact of Project on its environs)
1. Acquire relevant Code secƟons, Noise Elements, General Plan CondiƟons, CondiƟonal Use Permits, insƟtuƟonal standards, etc. from the City, Architect or AuthoriƟes Having JurisdicƟon relaƟve to the maximum noise emission permiƩed by Project that could potenƟally impact the surrounding environment at the project property line and/or at the sensiƟve uses surrounding the project due to permanently installed mechanical equipment. Establish the type(s) of acousƟcal analysis required by statute.
2. Document maximum level of emission individual units can generate based on applicable criteria and distance to nearest point where statutory compliance will be assessed. Incorporate findings in SchemaƟc Design AcousƟcal NarraƟve.
3. Obtain manufacturer noise emission data for the proposed mechanical systems. Analyze data and develop guidelines.
4. Provide wriƩen recommendaƟons outlining SFMI's findings and providing guidance regarding the need for architectural and mechanical means of miƟgaƟng the idenƟfied environmental noise emiƩers, including acousƟcal louvers, mechanical system and generator silencers, City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 9 of 16 2001448A mechanical equipment screens, site barriers, soundwalls or berms on the sound environment in the vicinity of the project. This would include size, locaƟons, orientaƟon, and composiƟon of such elements. RecommendaƟons will be in the form of concept sketches, draŌ acousƟc specificaƟon performance parameters and a wriƩen report/memo/email. PreparaƟon of detailed bid form ConstrucƟon Documents (drawings or specificaƟons) is not anƟcipated as a requirement of this Scope.
2.7 Bid Phase Services
a. Respond to Requests for ClarificaƟon of Bid Documents prepared by SFMI. Issue addenda as required to respond.
2.8 ConstrucƟon AdministraƟon - Architectural AcousƟcs – OpƟonal AddiƟonal Service a. Review Contractor's submiƩals as they relate to SFMI specified/recommended acousƟcal finishes, sound related walls, doors, glass and mechanical system noise and vibraƟon control; not to exceed one submiƩal and one re-submiƩal of each specified submiƩal item. b. Respond to requests for ClarificaƟon of Bid Documents related to SFMI’s design phase acousƟcs scope according to Project procedures as directed by CLIENT.
2.9 ConstrucƟon AdministraƟon - Low Voltage Infrastructure and Systems a. Review submiƩals regarding A/V Systems, Structured Cabling Infrastructure, Paging Systems, Broadband CommunicaƟons Systems, and Electronic Security Systems not to exceed one submiƩal and one re-submiƩal of each SFMI specified submiƩal item. b. Respond to requests for ClarificaƟon of Bid Documents prepared by SFMI according to Project procedures as directed by CLIENT.
c. Provide performance tesƟng and checkout for the separate systems, including observaƟon of Contractor Proof-of-Performance demonstraƟon, balancing and final adjustment review to verify compliance with requirements of the Contract Documents, (two on-site SFMI personnel days maximum assumed).
1. Provide wriƩen reports of system checkouts, including punch lists.
2.10 Post CompleƟon Record DocumentaƟon
a. Using red-lines of hard copies of the bid phase drawings prepared by the installing Contractor, revise the bid drawings to reflect condiƟons reported by the installing Contractor to be the "as-built" condiƟons for the work SFMI designed. SFMI assumes no responsibility for differences between those reported “as-built” by the Contractor through this process and actual condiƟons in the field. b. Return the Record Documents prepared through the process idenƟfied above to the Client in electronic and/or ploƩed form.
2.11 MeeƟngs
a. This proposal assumes SFMI’s aƩendance at up to one onsite observaƟon of exisƟng condiƟons and four design phase web-conferencing meeƟngs in support of the scope of services above. b. This proposal further does not assume SFMI’s aƩendance at any construcƟon phase meeƟngs other than in conjuncƟon with the construcƟon progress observaƟon or final punch acƟviƟes listed under CA services above.
ARTICLE 3 - SERVICES NOT PROVIDED
3.1 Per 1.1, SFMI understands that design and/or construcƟon administraƟon phase services are not required for the Project in the areas of:
a. AcousƟcs:
1. Under the Basic Scope of Services: Room AcousƟcs, Environmental Noise Impact Studies, Exterior Noise Impact Review, Interior Sound IsolaƟon Criteria, Mechanical Systems Noise and VibraƟon Control Criteria
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 10 of 16 2001448A
2. Electronic Speech Masking Systems, ConstrucƟon ObservaƟon and/or Punch
3. Field AcousƟcal Measurements.
4. LEED Post ConstrucƟon TesƟng/EvaluaƟon.
b. Audio-visual Systems: Monumental Entry Signage, Public Agency Council/Board MeeƟng Sound and Video/Brown Act/Broadcast/Streaming Video ProducƟon Systems, Outdoor Sports Field Announce Systems, Outdoor Amphitheater or similar AV equipped outdoor gathering space, Exterior Scoreboards, Interior Scoreboards, InstrucƟonal Space Speech LiŌ Systems, Satellite Television RecepƟon Systems.
c. Theatrical Systems: ProducƟon/Theatrical LighƟng, Draperies and/or Rigging Systems. d. CommunicaƟons Systems: LAN/WAN Systems Hardware, including Routers, Firewalls, General Purpose Network Switches, General Purpose Servers, Disk and Tape Backup Systems, Wireless Access Points, Rackmount UPS, General Purpose Computer WorkstaƟons, Printers and Related, Microwave CommunicaƟons Systems, VoIP/PBX Telephone Systems, Emergency Radio Responder Coverage (ERRC)/Public Safety Radio Repeater Systems, and/or Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS)/Cellular Telephone Repeater Systems.
e. CommunicaƟons Infrastructure: Data Center Design, Field measurement of the coverage/throughput of exisƟng Wi-Fi systems, Backbone Interior Riser Cabling. f. Outside Plant Engineering - Design of CommunicaƟons Ductbanks or outside plant communicaƟons cabling infrastructure more than 750 feet beyond the furthest face of the Project building(s), conduit proofing or documentaƟon of exisƟng underground communicaƟons ducts, their fill and remaining capacity for use by this Project.
g. Mass NoƟficaƟon/Mass CommunicaƟons Systems: Two-way CommunicaƟons Systems, Emergency Alert Systems, and/or Master Clock Systems.
h. Electronic Security and Safety Systems: Risk Assessment Study, Security OperaƟons Center (SOC), Area of Refuge Assistance Systems, Site Bluelight Telephone Systems. and does not propose these services.
3.2 Services proposed by SFMI do not include the work of licensed Design Professionals, including but not limited to the work of a registered Architect, a Professional Mechanical, Structural or Electrical Engineer or a Surveyor. Provision of such services, where required by the Project, is the work of Others.
3.3 As a consequence of 3.2, SFMI does not anƟcipate provision of base site or building plans. PreparaƟon of same is the work of Others, unless such provision of such work by SFMI is specifically indicated herein.
Where SFMI provides documentaƟon of exisƟng condiƟons, it is understood that such work does not consƟtute Survey work and should not be relied upon for circumstances requiring same. Such work is performed to prepare Contract Documents appropriate to the scope of SFMI's effort and may not be accurate in gross dimension, orientaƟon, construcƟon materials and other areas peripheral to SFMI's scope. Moreover, such drawings represent informaƟon that is available to SFMI personnel from visual observaƟon of the visible porƟons of exisƟng condiƟons, review of available documentaƟon, and/or discussions with facility personnel and contractors. The CLIENT understands that this process is subject to error due to the unavailability of complete informaƟon, representaƟon of design or as-built condiƟons that were not built as drawn or undocumented modificaƟons since preparaƟon of the drawings.
3.4 As a consequence of 3.2, SFMI is not responsible for the design or engineering of a method of means of support, suspension, aƩachment, fastening, bracing, restraint, etc (hereinaŌer "support"). Where the work of SFMI provides guidelines as to support, final engineering shall be provided by parƟes licensed to do so in the Project jurisdicƟon.
3.5 SFMI's Proposal does not anƟcipate that SFMI will prepare an Opinion of Probable ConstrucƟon Costs for the work of it designs. Such services, if required will be provided as an AddiƟonal Service.
3.6 SFMI's Proposal does not anƟcipate that SFMI will prepare Bid Documents other than Technical City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 11 of 16 2001448A SpecificaƟons as listed above and the related drawing set. Specifically, SFMI's proposal does not anƟcipate that SFMI will prepare Division 0 or Division 1 documents for the work SFMI has designed. Such work, if requested, will be proposed as AddiƟonal Services.
3.7 SFMI's Proposal assumes that the work of this Proposal will be bid as one package one Ɵme. SFMI's proposal does not anƟcipate preparaƟon of mulƟple bid packages. Such work, if requested, will be proposed as AddiƟonal Services.
3.8 SFMI assumes no responsibility as to the method or means of construcƟon employed in the provision of construcƟon and/or systems designed by SFMI, nor for safety at the Project job site.
3.9 Services to the Project for a period beyond the Project duraƟon outlined in 1.2 Project Schedule. Services provided beyond this point will be either provided at SFMI's then prevailing professional rate schedule or will be provided as an AddiƟonal Service.
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 12 of 16 2001448A ARTICLE 4 - COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
CLIENT shall compensate SFMI for the Basic Scope of Services, Reimbursable Expenses and AddiƟonal Services in accordance with the terms and condiƟons of this Proposal, as follows:
4.1 CompensaƟon for Basic Scope of Services. For the basic services described in ArƟcle 2, SFMI shall receive compensaƟon on a phased fixed fee basis computed as follows:
Basic Design Scope – Low Voltage Systems Professional
Services Fee
Design Phase
SchemaƟc Design $3,970
$43,690
Design Development $16,880
ConstrucƟon Documents $22,840
Total Design Phase
Bid Phase $950
ConstrucƟon Phase $9,340
Professional Services Fee Total $53,980
OpƟonal AddiƟonal Services Scope – AcousƟcal Engineering Professional Services Fee
Design Phase
SchemaƟc Design $4,140
$22,560
Design Development $9,090
ConstrucƟon Documents $9,330
Total Design Phase
Bid Phase $450
ConstrucƟon Phase $2,550
Professional Services Fee Total $25,560
4.2 Reimbursable Expenses.
a. CLIENT shall reimburse SFMI for expenses, as described in ArƟcle 8, incurred in connecƟon with this Proposal.
4.3 CompensaƟon for AddiƟonal Service. For AddiƟonal Services, as described in and requested or authorized by CLIENT in accordance with ArƟcle 9, SFMI shall receive compensaƟon computed as follows:
a. SFMI personnel charged at the following hourly rate schedule:
Principal Consultants/Engineers: $ 210.00 per hour
Associates/Senior Engineers: $ 185.00 per hour
Project Consultants/Engineers: $ 170.00 per hour
Consultants/Engineers: $ 150.00 per hour
Technicians/CAD/BIM: $ 120.00 per hour
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 13 of 16 2001448A b. For procurement of materials or consultaƟon with non-SFMI personnel, cost plus ten percent (10%).
4.4 Invoices and Payments.
a. Monthly Invoices. SFMI shall invoice CLIENT on a monthly basis for Professional Services, Reimbursable Expenses, and AddiƟonal Services rendered or incurred during the preceding month.
CLIENT shall make full payment on SFMI's invoices within thirty (30) days of the invoice date. b. 2 in 10 Discount. SFMI's invoices are subject to a two percent (2%) discount on the invoice amount if payment is received by SFMI within ten (10) days of the invoice date. c. Late Payments. Payments due and unpaid on any invoice in excess of thirty (30) days shall be subject to a late charge of eighty-two and one half hundreds of a percent (.825%) per month from the date payment is due. In the event that any payment is due and unpaid on any invoice in excess of sixty (60) days, CLIENT shall be deemed to be in substanƟal breach of this Proposal and SFMI may, in its sole discreƟon, elect to suspend its services hereunder without prejudice.
ARTICLE 5 - RISK ALLOCATION
The CLIENT recognizes that SFMI's fee includes allowance for funding a variety of risks which affect SFMI by virtue of its agreeing to perform services on the CLIENT's behalf. One of these risks stems from the potenƟal for human error by persons in the employ of SFMI. In order for the CLIENT to obtain the benefits of a fee which includes a lesser allowance for risk funding, the CLIENT agrees to limit SFMI's liability to the CLIENT and all construcƟon contractors arising from SFMI's professional acts, errors or omissions, such that the total aggregate liability of SFMI to all those named shall not exceed Two Hundred FiŌy Thousand Dollars ($250,000) or SFMI's total fee for the services of this Contract, whichever is less.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
ARTICLE 6 - TIME
6.1 SFMI shall provide services hereunder as expediƟously as possible, consistent with professional skill and care. SFMI and CLIENT expressly agree and recognize that SFMI shall not be held responsible nor liable, in any manner, for any delays not caused by negligent acts and/or omissions of SFMI or caused by factors not reasonably foreseen.
6.2 SFMI's proposal is based on the Project proceeding to compleƟon in accordance with the schedule idenƟfied in ArƟcle 1. In the event the project compleƟon is significantly delayed beyond the idenƟfied schedule and the delay is not caused by negligent acts and/or omissions of SFMI, SFMI reserves the right to propose AddiƟonal Services for the work completed outside of the proposed schedule at SFMI's personnel rate schedule then in effect.
ARTICLE 7 - CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES
7.1 CLIENT shall provide SFMI full informaƟon regarding any and all data perƟnent to the Project requirements.
7.2 CLIENT shall designate a representaƟve authorized to act on CLIENT's behalf with respect to the Project. CLIENT or such authorized representaƟve shall examine documents submiƩed by SFMI and shall render any decisions pertaining thereto promptly so as to permit the orderly progress of SFMI Services.
7.3 If CLIENT observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project or non-conformance with any studies, reports, design documents, drawings and/or specificaƟons prepared by SFMI hereunder, prompt wriƩen noƟce thereof shall be given by CLIENT to SFMI.
ARTICLE 8 - REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Reimbursable expenses are in addiƟon to compensaƟon for the Basic Scope of Services and any AddiƟonal Services which may be requested or authorized by CLIENT. SFMI shall invoice CLIENT for such reimbursable expenses at SFMI's cost plus 10%. Reimbursable expenses include expenses incurred by SFMI and its employees and agents in the interest of the Project, including but not limited to the following expenses:
8.1 When authorized in advance, expense of transportaƟon, including mileage at the IRS reimbursement rates in effect at the Ɵme of travel, subsistence and/or lodging when traveling in connecƟon with the Project.
8.2 Expense of express shipping, air freight, and any Project site expenses.
8.3 Expense of photocopying, binding, reproducƟons, CAD ploƫng of deliverables required by contract, expendable materials, special handling of any studies, reports, design documents, drawings and/or specificaƟons.
8.4 If authorized in advance by CLIENT, the expense of any premium porƟon of the overƟme services at premium rates.
8.5 Expense of renderings, models and mockups requested by CLIENT.
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 14 of 16 2001448A ARTICLE 9 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Services not included in the Basic Scope of Services shall be considered AddiƟonal Services of SFMI. CompensaƟon and payment for such AddiƟonal Services shall be in accordance with the terms herein. Upon authorizaƟon or confirmaƟon in wriƟng by CLIENT, SFMI will furnish or obtain addiƟonal services of the following types:
9.1 Services made necessary due to changes in the general scope and/or design of the Project.
9.2 Preparing Bridging Documents for use with a Design Build EnƟty (DBE). This Proposal assumes the work will be procured through a Design/Bid/Build (DBB) process. The allocaƟon of fees in the tables found in ArƟcle 4 reflect the level of effort appropriate to each phase in a DBB process and would need to be altered if a DBE process is to be used.
9.3 Revisions to documents prepared by SFMI when such revisions are inconsistent with CLIENT's prior wriƩen approval or instrucƟons, are required by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulaƟons subsequent to the preparaƟon of such documents or are due to any other cause not solely within the control of SFMI.
9.4 Furnishing hard copies of studies, reports, design documents, drawings and/or specificaƟons in excess of those set forth herein.
9.5 Bid Phase and ConstrucƟon Phase services, other than as are provided for under ArƟcle 2 herein.
9.6 Providing and/or parƟcipaƟng in orientaƟon meeƟngs explaining the project technical program to persons not involved in the Project during the Design Phase when the technical program decisions were made.
9.7 Providing repeated punching of the Contractor's work due to failure of Contractor to adequately complete the work or the specified tesƟng of the work prior to requesƟng SFMI to visit the jobsite to observe the proof-of-performance tesƟng and systems demonstraƟon by the Contractor provided for in SFMI's Basic Scope of Services.
9.8 Providing extensive assistance in the uƟlizaƟon of any equipment or system including, but not limited to iniƟal start-up or tesƟng, adjusƟng and balancing, preparaƟon of operaƟon and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operaƟon and maintenance, and consultaƟon during operaƟon.
9.9 Providing any other services not otherwise included herein.
ARTICLE 10 - COST AND SCHEDULE OF CONSTRUCTION WORK
In providing opinions of probable cost and project schedule, it is recognized that neither the CLIENT nor SFMI has control over the costs of labor, equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices or Ɵme. The opinions of probable cost or project duraƟon are based on SFMI's reasonable professional judgment and experience and do not consƟtute a warranty, express or implied, that the Contractor's bids, project schedules or negoƟated price of the Work or schedule will not vary from the CLIENT's budget or schedule or from any opinion of cost or schedule prepared by SFMI. Project costs and Ɵmes will be determined only when the bids have been received for the PROJECT and when the construcƟon work has been performed and payments finalized.
ARTICLE 11 - OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS
Drawings, specificaƟons, studies, reports and design documents as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of SFMI whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. CLIENT shall be permiƩed to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of such documents for informaƟon and in reference to the Project. Such documents provided hereunder by SFMI shall not be used by CLIENT in connecƟon with any other project, for addiƟons to this Project, or for compleƟon of projects by others, except by wriƩen consent of and with appropriate compensaƟon to SFMI.
ARTICLE 12 - INDEPENDENT AGENCY
SFMI, and the agents and employees of SFMI, in the performance of this agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of the CLIENT.
ARTICLE 13 - SUSPENSION OF SERVICES AND TERMINATION
13.1 In the event CLIENT suspends the services of SFMI for a period in excess of two (2) months, or in the event the Project is abandoned in whole or in part, SFMI shall be paid all fees, direct costs, and reimbursable expenses accrued prior to such suspension or abandonment.
13.2 This Proposal may be terminated by any of the following:
a. by either SFMI or CLIENT upon seven (7) days wriƩen noƟce to the other party of such intent to terminate b. by mutual agreement of the parƟes
c. in the event of a substanƟal failure to perform in accordance with the terms and condiƟons by the other party. d. In the event this Proposal is terminated, SFMI shall be paid all fees, direct costs, and reimbursable expenses accrued to and including the date of such terminaƟon as well as any "shut-down" costs incurred by SFMI in terminaƟng the Proposal.
ARTICLE 14 - ATTORNEYS' FEES
14.1 AƩorneys' Fees. In the event any claim or dispute arises under this Proposal, legal proceedings are iniƟated, the prevailing party in any such legal proceeding shall be enƟtled to recover from the other party its aƩorney's fees and costs incurred in connecƟon with such proceedings.
ARTICLE 15 - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
15.1 Law Governing. This Proposal shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
15.2 Assignment. Except upon the express wriƩen consent of SFMI, CLIENT shall not assign, sublet or transfer any interest or porƟon of this Proposal.
15.3 WriƩen NoƟce. Any wriƩen noƟce provided for or required hereunder shall be deemed to have been duly served if delivered in person to the individual or member of the firm or enƟty or to an officer of the party for whom it was intended, or if delivered at or sent by United States first City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 15 of 16 2001448A class postage.
15.4 EnƟre Agreement. This Proposal, as executed, represents the enƟre and integrated agreement between CLIENT and SFMI and supersedes all prior negoƟaƟons, representaƟons or proposals, whether wriƩen or oral. This Proposal, as executed, may be amended or modified only by wriƩen instrument executed by both CLIENT and SFMI.
15.5 Counterparts. This Proposal may be executed in counterparts by SFMI and CLIENT and when fully executed shall be deemed to be in full force and effect from the date first set forth above.
SMITH, FAUSE & McDONALD, INC. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL ("CLIENT") By By
Peter A. McDonald, President Title
City of South San Francisco, 840 W Orange Ave Preschool & Westborough Preschool Comm Infr, ESS, AV and AcousƟcal Engineering Page 16 of 16 2001448A
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED FEES:
CUMMING
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Conceptual Design:
Role 1: Senior Cost Manager 29 200 $5,800.00
Role 2: Managing Director 4 300 $1,200.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 33 500 $7,000.00
100% Schematic Design:
Role 1: Cost Manager 20 185 $3,700.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 5 200 $1,000.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 6 200 $1,200.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 6 200 $1,200.00
Role 5: Managing Director 3 300 $900.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 40 1085 $8,000.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
50% Design Development:
Role 1: Cost Manager 20 185 $3,700.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 11 200 $2,200.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 8 200 $1,600.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 8 200 $1,600.00
Role 5: Managing Director 3 300 $900.00
Subtotal Design Development: 50 1085 $10,000.00
100% Design Development:
Role 1: Cost Manager 27 185 $4,995.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 11 200 $2,200.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 8 200 $1,600.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 8 200 $1,600.00
Role 5: Managing Director 2 300 $600.00
Subtotal Design Development: 56 1085 $10,995.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
50% Construction Documents:
Role 1: Cost Manager 27 185 $4,995.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 12 200 $2,400.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 10 200 $2,000.00 Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 10 200 $2,000.00 Role 5: Managing Director 2 300 $600.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 61 1085 $11,995.00
90% Construction Documents:
Role 1: Cost Manager 20 185 $3,700.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 6 200 $1,200.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 6 200 $1,200.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 6 200 $1,200.00
Role 5: Managing Director 3 300 $900.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 41 1085 $8,200.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 281 5925 $56,190.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 281 5925 $56,190.00
Cost Estimating - Cumming
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
ESTIMATED FEES
Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Conceptual Design:
Role 1: Senior Cost Manager 12 200 $2,400.00
Role 2: Managing Director 2 300 $600.00
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 14 500 $3,000.00
100% Schematic Design:
Role 1: Cost Manager 8 185 $1,480.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 2 200 $400.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 2 200 $400.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 2 200 $400.00
Role 5: Managing Director 1 300 $300.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 15 1085 $2,980.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
50% Design Development:
Role 1: Cost Manager 8 185 $1,480.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 2 200 $400.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 4 200 $800.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 4 200 $800.00
Role 5: Managing Director 1 300 $300.00
Subtotal Design Development: 19 1085 $3,780.00
100% Design Development:
Role 1: Cost Manager 10 185 $1,850.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 2 200 $400.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 4 200 $800.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 4 200 $800.00
Role 5: Managing Director 1 300 $300.00
Subtotal Design Development: 21 1085 $4,150.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
50% Construction Documents:
Role 1: Cost Manager 9 185 $1,665.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 3 200 $600.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 5 200 $1,000.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 5 200 $1,000.00
Role 5: Managing Director 1 300 $300.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 23 1085 $4,565.00
90% Construction Documents:
Role 1: Cost Manager 8 185 $1,480.00
Role 2: Senior Cost Manager 3 200 $600.00
Role 3: Senior Cost Manager Electrical 2 200 $400.00
Role 4: Senior Cost Manager Mechanical 2 200 $400.00
Role 5: Managing Director 1 300 $300.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 16 1085 $3,180.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 108 5925 $21,655.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 108 5925 $21,655.00
Cost Estimating - Cumming
Westborough Preschool Addition
475 Sansome St., Suite 700 | San Francisco, CA 94111 | (415) 748-3080 | (415) 748-3090 www.ccorpusa.com
1 840 W. ORANGE AVE. & WESTBOROUGH PRESCHOOLS
COST MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL
August 4th, 2023
Mary Peterson
Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Proposal No: 23-2146A
RE: CSSF 840 W. Orange Ave. Preschool Conversion Project and Westborough Preschool Addition Cost Management Services Proposal
Dear Mary:
Thank you for giving Cumming the opportunity to work with you on the above-mentioned project. Cumming has a long history of working collaboratively with owners and developers across the United States. Our team members are skilled in fostering an atmosphere of innovation, responsibility, responsiveness, and honest communication. Our proactive approach, along with our communication skills, helps keep the entire team ever mindful of budget, risk, and schedule parameters. We will work closely with all stakeholders within the team to ensure your project is delivered in a way that exceeds your expectations.
Further to your request for provision of Cumming’s cost management services related to the CSSF 840 W. Orange Ave. Preschool Conversion Project and Westborough Preschool Addition, please find the following documents, for your review.
1) Project Understanding
2) Scope of Services and Fee
If we can answer any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
Vaughan Clarke
Managing Director
[email protected]
C: 415-982-9130
475 Sansome St., Suite 700 | San Francisco, CA 94111 | (415) 748-3080 | (415) 748-3090 www.ccorpusa.com
2 840 W. ORANGE AVE. & WESTBOROUGH PRESCHOOLS
COST MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL
1. SECTION 1 - PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
We understand the project consists of two components: 1) renovation f 14,400sf of existing building at 840 W. Orange for preschool conversion, and 2) addition of three portable structures for use as classrooms at the Westborough Preschool site. The anticipated project budget is $14M.
2. SECTION 2 - SCOPE OF SERVICES and FEE
Proposed Base Scope Services Include:
• Prepare a single Statement of Probable Cost (ROM) at the following design milestones: 100% Schematic Design, 50% and 100% Design Development, and 50% and 90% Construction Documents. o Quantify and price all available contract documents.
o Prepare separate estimate packages assuming separate design review packages, per sub-project. o Update the SOPCs based on team feedback.
Exclusions
• Life-cycle cost analyses, change order analyses, or construction administration services. • Reconciliation of the SOPCs with a third-party estimator, construction manager, or general contractor. • Additional revisions to completed estimates, or additional estimates.
Our lump sum fee for the above services is as noted in the table below:
ELEMENT TOTAL $
Base Services
840 West Orange Avenue Preschool Conversion
100% Schematic Design SOPC 40 $200.00 $8,000
50% Design Development SOPC 50 $200.00 $10,000
100% Design Development SOPC 55 $200.00 $11,000
50% Construction Documents SOPC 60 $200.00 $12,000
90% Construction Documents SOPC Update 41 $200.00 $8,200 Westborough Preschool Addition
100% Schematic Design SOPC 15 $200.00 $3,000
50% Design Development SOPC 19 $200.00 $3,800
100% Design Development SOPC 21 $200.00 $4,200
50% Construction Documents SOPC 23 $200.00 $4,600
90% Construction Documents SOPC Update 16 $200.00 $3,200 TOTAL - BASE SERVICES $68,000
Alternate Services
Conceptual Design / Budget Validation SOPC (West Orange, $7k. Westborough, $3k) $200.00 $10,000 Life Cycle Cost Analysis $200.00 $5,550
TOTAL INCLUDING ALTERNATE SERVICES $83,550
Our fees assume delivery of all design documentation in a single package. Should any of the scope be deleted, or staggered submittals anticipated, we reserve the right to adjust our fees to match the change in level of effort.
Our fees assume any required design information (including drawings, specifications, and reports) for the performance of our work will be provided electronically at no cost to Cumming. PDF is the preferred electronic format.
The estimates will be presented in an industry standard or custom format to suit both design team’s review and owner preference.
475 Sansome St., Suite 700 | San Francisco, CA 94111 | (415) 748-3080 | (415) 748-3090 www.ccorpusa.com
3 840 W. ORANGE AVE. & WESTBOROUGH PRESCHOOLS
COST MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL
Fees are valid for 90 days from the date of this proposal. Should any of the above tasks be deleted from our scope of services, we reserve the right to adjust the remaining fees to reflect possible resultant changes to the scope of the remaining service.
Please note we will require written authorization to proceed and acceptance of the proposed contract attached to this letter. We are excited to work with you to provide comprehensive cost management services and look forward to the opportunity to add value to your project.
Should this proposal be acceptable, please sign and return:
Dorman Associates, Inc.
Authorized
Signature:
Print Name:
Print Title:
HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
PROPOSED FEES:
ENGEO
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis: Task 1 - Geotechnical Foundation Design Report Principal 8 365 $2,920.00
Associate 8 305 $2,440.00
Senior Engineer 8 265 $2,120.00
Project Engineer 24 235 $5,640.00
Staff Engineer 40 205 $8,200.00
Subcontractors $10,500.00
Subtotal Programming: 88 $31,820.00
Schematic Design: Task 2 - Exisiting Foundation Validation (Optional) Principal 4 365 $1,460.00
Associate 4 305 $1,220.00
Senior Engineer 4 265 $1,060.00
Project Engineer 10 235 $2,350.00
Staff Engineer 24 205 $4,920.00
Subcontractors $25,000.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 46 $36,010.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development: Task 3 - Design Development Support Principal 15 365 $5,475.00
Associate 0 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 20 235 $4,700.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 35 $10,175.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set: Task 3 - Design Development Support
Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 4 305 $1,220.00
Senior Engineer 10 265 $2,650.00
Project Engineer 10 235 $2,350.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 26 $6,950.00
Construction Set: Task 3 - Design Development Support
Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 2 305 $610.00
Senior Engineer 4 265 $1,060.00
Project Engineer 8 235 $1,880.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 16 $4,280.00
Plan Check Response: Task 3 - Design Development Support Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 2 305 $610.00
Senior Engineer 4 265 $1,060.00
Project Engineer 8 235 $1,880.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 16 $4,280.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration: Task 4 - Construction Administration Principal 10 365 $3,650.00
Associate 20 305 $6,100.00
Senior Engineer 30 265 $7,950.00
Project Engineer 40 235 $9,400.00
Staff Engineer 40 205 $8,200.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 140 $35,300.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 367 $128,815.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 367 $128,815.00
Geotech - ENGEO
840 West Orange Ave. Preschool
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I SCHEMATIC DESIGN:
Programming & Site Analysis: Task 1 - Geotechnical Foundation Design Report Principal 5 365 $1,825.00
Associate 5 305 $1,525.00
Senior Engineer 8 265 $2,120.00
Project Engineer 20 235 $4,700.00
Staff Engineer 15 205 $3,075.00
Subtotal Programming: 53 $13,245.00
Phase II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
Design Development: Task 3 - Design Development Support Principal 5 365 $1,825.00
Associate 0 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 10 235 $2,350.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 15 $4,175.00
Phase III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
Permit Set: Task 3 - Design Development Support
Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 0 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 10 235 $2,350.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 12 $3,080.00
Plan Check Response: Task 3 - Design Development Support Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 0 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 8 235 $1,880.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 10 $2,610.00
Phase IV CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION:
Construction Administration: Task 4 - Construction Administration Principal 10 365 $3,650.00
Associate 10 305 $3,050.00
Senior Engineer 30 265 $7,950.00
Project Engineer 40 235 $9,400.00
Staff Engineer 20 205 $4,100.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 110 $28,150.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 200 $51,260.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 200 $51,260.00
Geotech - ENGEO
Westborough Preschool Addition
GEOTECHNICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
WATER RESOURCES
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS
751 13th Street San Francisco, CA 94130 (925) 866-9000 Fax (888) 279-2698 www.engeo.com
Project No.
P23917.000.001
August 7, 2023
Ms. Mary Peterson
Dorman Associates, Inc.
229 Flamingo Road
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Subject: West Orange Conversion and Westborough Addition 840 West Orange Avenue and 2380 Galway Drive
South San Francisco, California
PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SERVICES
Dear Ms. Peterson:
We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide geotechnical services in support of Dorman Associates pursuit for the City of South San Francisco's Request for Proposal (RFP) for architectural services related to the 840 West Orange Avenue Preschool Conversion Project (referred to as West Orange Conversion) and the Westborough Preschool Remodel/Addition (referred to as Westborough Addition) in South San Francisco, California. The purpose of our services is to provide geotechnical recommendations related to both sites.
In this proposal, we first present a high-level description of the project and associated geotechnical considerations, followed by our proposed scope of services, fees, and assumptions.
We have also included relevant project qualifications and resumes of key personnel as attachments to this proposal.
SITE LOCATION AND BACKGROUND
The project includes two sites; an approximately 1.5-acre site is located at 840 West Orange Avenue and a second site located at 2380 Galway Drive in South San Francisco, California. The West Orange Avenue site is currently developed and occupied by the existing South San Francisco Public Library building and adjacent paved parking lots. The existing library structure has one main level above ground and one basement level below ground. The Galway Drive site is also developed and occupied by the existing Alice Peña Bulos Community Center building, adjacent paved parking lot, and play area.
For the West Orange Conversion, the 2019 Feasibility Study presents two options for the new preschool. Option 1 includes converting the existing library building to preschool use and Option 2 includes construction of a new preschool building on the site. We understand the city is considering Option 1. This option involves repurposing the existing 14,400-square-foot (sf) library into a licensed preschool facility. The renovation will include the addition of classroom and multipurpose room spaces, as well as a new outdoor play area. Based on discussions with ZFA Structural Engineers, the renovation will likely involve a mandatory seismic upgrade and relocation of structural supports, which may necessitate new foundation support elements. The project will also include supporting improvements.
Dorman Associates, Inc. P23917.000.001
West Orange Conversion and Westborough Addition August 7, 2023 PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SERVICES Page 2
For the Westborough Addition, we understand that the city plans to provide additional classroom space through the use of three relocatable portable structures. The exact locations of the structures have not been determined at present time; however, the structures will be located on the same site as the community center. In addition, a new playground with play structures will also be added to this facility.
GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Based on our experience with nearby projects, the West Orange Avenue site is anticipated to be underlain by Colma Formation, which generally consists of medium dense to dense sandy clay and silty sand. We anticipate that the site may be classified as Site Class C or D in accordance with the 2016 ASCE/SEI 7 Standard (ASCE 7-16) for new building construction and the 2017 ASCE/SEI 7 Standard (ASCE 41-17) for the seismic retrofit of existing buildings.
The Westborough Addition site is anticipated to be underlain by Merced Formation, which generally consists of medium dense to dense sand, silt, and clay with minor amounts of gravel.
Similarly, we anticipate that the site may be classified as Site Class C or D in accordance with the 2016 ASCE/SEI 7 Standard (ASCE 7-16) for new building construction.
The sites are not located within the State of California Earthquake Fault Hazard Zone and no known active faults cross the sites. According to the State of California Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation for the South San Francisco Quadrangle (2003), the sites are not located within an area mapped as being potentially susceptible to liquefaction. We provide a discussion of these maps in this proposal for general reference; however, we require further investigation to evaluate these risks to the sites.
Structural loads for the West Orange Conversion will be provided during design development; however, additional structural loads are anticipated as a result of the building conversion and seismic retrofit. The existing foundation system and its condition are unknown; however, we anticipate that both existing and new foundations will be relied on to support structural loads.
Structural loads and site grading for the Westborough Addition have yet to be determined; however, we assume that structural loads will be relatively light for prefabricated construction and foundation support will consist of shallow spread footings. It is anticipated grading will be minor and limited to those that are required to provide for a level building pad.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1: Geotechnical Foundation Design Report
Our scope of services will involve field exploration, engineering analysis, and preparation of conclusions and recommendations for foundations and design of associated improvements.
Cone Penetration Testing Exploration
We will retain the services of a cone penetration test (CPT) contractor to advance two CPT soundings at the West Orange Conversion project to maximum depths of 100 feet below the existing ground surface (or practical refusal, if shallower). The CPTs will provide a continuous penetration profile and reliable data for correlation of liquefaction susceptibility and soil compressibility. The CPTs will also measure in-situ shear-wave velocities (VS) at regular intervals in accordance with the ASTM D7400 test method. The shear-wave velocity measurements are required to develop the time-averaged shear-wave velocity over the top 100 feet or 30 meters Dorman Associates, Inc. P23917.000.001
West Orange Conversion and Westborough Addition August 7, 2023 PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SERVICES Page 3
(VS30) for the site as recommended by the California Building Code to identify the proper Site Class for the seismic design of the structure. We will also perform pore-pressure dissipation testing in each of the CPTs to estimate the hydrostatic groundwater level information at each CPT location. The approximate locations of our proposed CPTs are shown in Exhibit 1. The exploration will be performed in accordance with San Mateo County Health Department permit requirements.
EXHIBIT 1: Proposed Exploration Locations for the West Orange Conversion Hand Auger Exploration
For exploration of the subsurface condition at Westborough Addition, we propose to characterize the near surface condition by performing two hand augers to a maximum depth of 5 feet below the existing ground surface at the approximate locations shown in Exhibit 2. An ENGEO engineer or geologist will perform the field exploration and log the subsurface conditions encountered.
Select soil samples will be obtained for visual classification and laboratory index testing.
Dorman Associates, Inc. P23917.000.001
West Orange Conversion and Westborough Addition August 7, 2023 PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SERVICES Page 4
EXHIBIT 2: Proposed Exploration Locations for the Westborough Addition Engineering Analysis and Report Preparation
We will analyze the subsurface conditions and prepare a geotechnical report for each site that will include the following items.
• Review of existing geotechnical data at the site, historical aerial photographs, topographic, and geologic maps, if available
• Discussion of explorations and laboratory testing
• Discussion of groundwater levels, historical and at the time of exploration • Discussion of physical properties of the typical soil encountered • Description of site seismicity and seismic hazards, including the potential for dry-sand settlement and liquefaction, if applicable
• ASCE 7-16 and ASCE 41-17 mapped seismic design parameters. Discussion with the structural engineer indicates that the code exception in Section 11.4.8 of ASCE 7-16 and Supplement No. 3 will be acceptable; therefore, a site-specific seismic-hazard analysis is not anticipated.
• Foundation design parameters
o Shallow foundations
▪ Allowable vertical capacity
▪ Passive resistance
▪ Foundation settlement
o Micropiles (West Orange Conversion only)
▪ Allowable vertical capacity
▪ Minimum embedment
Dorman Associates, Inc. P23917.000.001
West Orange Conversion and Westborough Addition August 7, 2023 PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SERVICES Page 5
• Static and seismic lateral earth pressures and ultimate lateral resistance of basement retaining walls for West Orange Conversion
• Estimation of settlement due to liquefaction, cyclic softening, and consolidation (total and differential) for the West Orange Conversion
• Landscape and drainage recommendations including stormwater infiltration opportunities and geotechnical recommendations associated with stormwater treatment • Construction considerations
The geotechnical reports will include a summary of the surface and subsurface conditions, seismicity, CPT logs, and a site plan showing our exploratory locations and improvement limits.
Our reports will be signed by a licensed California Geotechnical Engineer.
Task 2: Existing Foundation Validation (Optional)
Since as-built information on the existing foundation may not be available for the South San Francisco Public Library building, it may be desirable to expose the existing slab to evaluate the dimensions and observe the condition of the existing footings at four locations. We will retain the service of a subcontractor to perform the work. An engineer or field representative of our firm will observe the exploration of a 4-foot-by-4-foot hand-dug excavation that will extend no deeper than 4 feet below the slab-on-grade to comply with OSHA standards. Our contractor will perform an approximately 4-foot-by-4-foot sawcut of the existing slab to remove the existing slab-on-grade adjacent to an existing column within the building at various locations selected by the project structural engineer. We will visually log the dimensions and conditions of the foundations. We will log the soil and obtain representative samples for testing, as necessary. Once the exploration is complete, we will backfill the excavations with existing soil and compact the material with hand operated tools. We will place concrete to restore the existing elevation. Excess concrete spoils will be removed and offhauled to an appropriate disposal facility. Our scope does not include placement of reinforcing steel or doweling into existing foundation. We will perform a hand trowel finish of the floor slab patches but will not replace floor covering for interior exploration locations or restoring landscaping for exterior exploration locations. We anticipate the work will require 3 to 4 days to complete. Upon completion of the excavations, we will prepare a letter documenting our observations.
Task 3: Design Development Support
Our experience with similar projects indicates continued collaboration with you and your structural engineer will be necessary upon completion of Tasks 1 and 2. During design development, we will provide as-needed consultation to your design team which may include the following. • Value-engineer consultation to reconcile project construction cost (30 hours) • Review of structural and civil improvement plans for permit issuance • Response to plan check comments
• Attend project design meetings (20 hours)
Dorman Associates, Inc. P23917.000.001
West Orange Conversion and Westborough Addition August 7, 2023 PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SERVICES Page 6
Task 4: Construction Administration
We anticipate having continuous involvement during construction of the project for both sites.
Construction administration is anticipated to involve, but not limited to, the following. • Response to submittals and RFIs
• Provide construction engineering and consultation
• Attending construction meetings
• Review third-party inspection testing results
• Prepare a final geotechnical conformance letter at project completion for permit close-out Our effort associated with construction administration depends on the final design and construction duration. We appreciate the right to review the construction schedule to confirm if the assumed scope is appropriate. While we provide construction inspection services, depending on the city’s preference, inspection may be performed by a third-party inspection while we remain the engineer-of-record. The scope for testing and observation inspection services is not included but can be provided under a separate proposal, if needed.
Exclusions and Assumptions:
• Field work will be performed during normal business hours between Monday and Friday.
Holiday and after-hour services are not included. Subcontractor fees assume prevailing wage. • Clear access will be available for our subcontractor to perform the foundation excavations, our services do not include standby time or labor to create access for exploration equipment. • We expect the existing slab-on-grade at the location of excavations to be less than 6 inches thick. The locations of foundation excavation will be coordinated with the structural engineer.
We are unable to guarantee exposure to existing foundation elements. • Our subcontractor will restore the concrete surface to a similar surface to the existing foundation.
• No warranty is provided for their work beyond the backfill. Additional effort to restore the structural integrity of the slab is not included in this scope.
FEE AGREEMENT AND SCHEDULE
We propose to provide the above-described services for a fee as summarized in Table 1. We additionally provide our preferred client fee schedule and a summary of staff utilization as attachments to this proposal.
TABLE 1: Summary of Proposed Fees
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FEE
SCHEDULE
W. ORANGE WESTBOROUGH
Task 1: Geotechnical Foundation Design Report $31,820 $13,245 4 to 6 weeks Task 2: Existing Foundation Validation (Optional) $36,010 - 3 to 4 days Task 3: Design Development Support $25,685 $9,865 -
Task 4: Construction Administration $35,300* $28,150 -
TOTALS $128,815 $51,260
*Subject to final design and construction schedule
Dorman Associates, Inc. P23917.000.001
West Orange Conversion and Westborough Addition August 7, 2023 PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SERVICES Page 7
SITE ACCESS
Necessary removal or unlocking of fences or gates, permission to enter the site from the current owner or leaseholder, and/or required use permits must be secured by the client prior to our field activities. If site access or weather conditions restrict our field operations, a revision to our fee may be necessary.
We will provide appropriate notification to Underground Service Alert prior to performing our exploration to locate public utilities in potential conflict with the proposed subsurface exploration.
ENGEO or its subcontractors will accept no responsibility for damage to existing utilities not accurately located.
If we identify potentially hazardous materials either visually or by odor during our exploration, we will notify you as soon as possible of such an occurrence in order to decide mutually whether to continue, modify, or cease the remainder of the field exploration program. Additional costs incurred as a result of encountering suspected hazardous materials will be charged on a time-and-expense basis over and above the estimated fee for the exploration proposed herein.
LIMITATIONS
ENGEO's liability for damage due to professional negligence, acts, errors, omissions, breach of contract and consequential damages will be limited by Client to an amount not to exceed an aggregate limit of four hundred thousand dollars or ENGEO’s fee, whichever is greater, regardless of the legal theory under which such liability is imposed.
We look forward to serving you on this project. If you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal, please contact us and we will be glad to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
ENGEO Incorporated
Chris Nicas, PE Leroy Chan, GE, LEED-AP
Project Engineer Principal
crn/lc/rhb/ca
Attachments: Relevant Project Qualifications
Resumes of Key Personnel
Preferred Client Fee Schedule
Summary of Proposed Professional Time and Fee
DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
840 W ORANGE AVE PRESCHOOL CONVERSION & WESTBOROUGH PRESCHOOL REMODEL/ADDITION PAGE | 1
RELEVANT PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS
CLIENT
Jasmine Gao, San Mateo County PDU
(707) 399-5032, [email protected]
DURATION
2021-ongoing
PROJECT COST
$45,000,000
KEY PERSONNEL
• Leroy Chan, Principal-in-Charge
• Alex Light, Geotechnical Engineer
SAN MATEO COUNTY WELLNESS CENTER
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
ENGEO provided geotechnical design and construction
administration services for the public health clinic in South San Francisco, California. We performed a geotechnical exploration program and worked with the Structural Engineer on developing a low noise and vibration ground improvement program to support the building on soft compressible and liquefiable soil.
The project includes construction of a new 77,000 square foot 3- story health center and office building for the San Mateo County Health Systems
SERVICES
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Construction Administration
CLIENT
William Newby
Oakland Unified School District
(510) 532-2802, [email protected],
DURATION
2015 – 2021
PROJECT COST
$46M – Total for all projects
KEY PERSONNEL
• Ted Bayham, Principal-in-Charge Stefanos
Papadopulos, Project Manager
• Pedro Espinosa, Geotechnical Engineer
GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION &
RETROFIT
OAKLAND, CA
ENGEO conducted a geotechnical exploration and prepared the geotechnical and a geological hazards report in general conformance with the requirements of the Division of State Architects Office (DSA) and California Geologic Survey (CGS) as indicated in IR-A4, CGS note 48. The improvements for the Glenview Elementary School included the following:
• Seismically retrofitting the 2-story and 3-story classroom building
• New 2-story classroom and library building
• New 1-story multi-purpose classroom, and kitchen building • New ADA-compliant access to school main entrance
SERVICES
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Geologic Hazard Assessment
• Seismic Hazard Analysis
DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
840 W ORANGE AVE PRESCHOOL CONVERSION & WESTBOROUGH PRESCHOOL REMODEL/ADDITION PAGE | 2
CLIENT
Veronica Wong, Capital Projects
University of California, Berkeley
(510) 642-9446, [email protected]
DURATION
2020—present
PROJECT COST
$400M – Total for all projects
KEY PERSONNEL
• Jeff Fippin, Geotechnical Engineer
• Pedro Espinosa, Geotechnical Engineer
• David Teague, Geotechnical Engineer
UC BERKELEY HESSE-O’BRIEN BUILDING
BERKELEY, CA
ENGEO is providing the geotechnical and geologic design services on this project and has prepared conclusions and recommendations for concept design. The planned seismic replacement building is envisioned as a modern, state-of-the-art, interdisciplinary hub for the University, and will include research and teaching laboratories, offices, classrooms, and collaboration spaces within the existing footprint of Hesse and O’Brien Halls.
ENGEO developed and executed a full geotechnical exploration for the site including borings and geophysical testing. ENGEO also developed site-specific response spectra in accordance with the California Building Code and ASCE 7, and provided
geotechnical recommendations for foundations, retaining walls, seismic lateral earth pressures, and rigid and flexible pavement sections.
SERVICES
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Geophysical Testing
• Seismic Hazard Analysis
CLIENT
William Newby
Oakland Unified School District
(510) 532-2802
[email protected]
DURATION
2018-2019
APPROXIMATE PROJECT COST
$44M – Total for all projects
KEY PERSONNEL
• Ted Bayham, Principal-in-Charge
• Stefanos Papadopulos, Project Manager
• Pedro Espinosa, Geotechnical Engineer
OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
OAKLAND, CA
ENGEO was selected by Oakland Unified School District in 2011 to provide geotechnical engineering and environmental
engineering services for improvements in four schools within the district. We have delivered our services on time. By providing innovative solutions and combining geotechnical and
environmental services, we are able to complete the authorized scope of services below the authorized budget.
• Sankofa Academy – New Classroom, New Modular
Administration Buildings, Shade Structure, Student Plaza • Laurel Child Development Center
• Glenview Elementary School – Seismic Retrofit, New
Classroom and Library Building, Retaining Wall
• James Madison Middle School– Athletic Field, Running Track • Dewey Academy – Construction monitoring
SERVICES
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Environmental Engineering
DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
840 W ORANGE AVE PRESCHOOL CONVERSION & WESTBOROUGH PRESCHOOL REMODEL/ADDITION PAGE | 3
CLIENT
Mr. Ferdinand Vergeire
San Francisco Unified School District
(415) 241-6152
DURATION
2020—ongoing
APPROXIMATE PROJECT COST
$3,848,000
KEY PERSONNEL
• Jeff Fippin, Principal-in-Charge
• Christopher Stouffer, Project Manager
• David Teague, Seismic Engineer
• Leroy Chan, Geotechnical Engineer
• Ted Bayham, Geotechnical Review
CLEVELAND ELEMENTARY CLASSROOM EXPANSION
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Cleveland Elementary School is situated in the Excelsior District located in southern San Francisco. The school comprises a multi-story building located within the northern area of the site, and two single-story classroom buildings on the eastern and western boundaries. The school buildings surround a paved schoolyard. The project includes demolition and replacement of the existing single-story building located on the western boundary. The site is underlain by a relatively thin layer of undocumented fill and loose sand. The main geotechnical hazard at the site is the risk of liquefaction due to the presence of loose sand below the historic high groundwater
measurements at the site. ENGEO performed a geotechnical exploration and geologic hazard assessment for the site in general conformance with the requirements of the DSA Office and CGS, as indicated in Note 48.
SERVICES
• Geotechnical Exploration
• Geologic Hazard Assessment
• Seismic Analysis
CLIENT
Jan Shipley, Construction Supervisor
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District
(925) 606-3390, [email protected]
DURATION
2016-2021
APPROXIMATE PROJECT COST
$750,000 – Total for all projects
KEY PERSONNEL
• Jeff Fippin, Principal-in-Charge
LIVERMORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
LIVERMORE, CA
ENGEO has provided on-call materials testing and inspections and geotechnical engineering services for the past 6 years for the relocation of temporary portable buildings and ancillary structures. The portable building relocations provided additional classroom capacity for the respective schools. We provided our services in conformance with the requirements of DSA for the following projects:
• Granada High School
• Del Valle High School
• Joe Michell Elementary School
• Junction Avenue K-8
• Livermore High School
• Croce Elementary
SERVICES
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Testing and Inspections
DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
840 W ORANGE AVE PRESCHOOL CONVERSION & WESTBOROUGH PRESCHOOL REMODEL/ADDITION PAGE | 4
CLIENT
Mr. Ferdinand Vergeire
San Francisco Unified School District
(415) 241-6152
DURATION
2016—2022
APPROXIMATE PROJECT COST
$15,720,000
KEY PERSONNEL
• Stefanos Papadopulos, Project Manager
• Jeffrey Fippin, Principal-in-Charge
• Pedro Espinosa, Geotechnical Engineer
• Ted Bayham, Geotechnical/Geologic
Reviewer
CLAIRE LILIENTHAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RETROFIT
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
In 2018 the San Francisco Unified School District elected to perform a voluntary seismic retrofit at Claire Lilienthal Elementary School and engaged ENGEO to perform a geologic hazard assessment, prepare construction drawings and
specification for strengthening the soil below existing and new footings, and provide quality control and quality assurance during construction. Ground improvement comprising
compaction and permeation grouting was selected to limit differential settlement due to liquefaction under footings to 0.5 inches over a span of 30 feet; other project benefits included optimized construction costs and performance of the retrofit in a period of 9 months. ENGEO’s work directly resulted in an increased level of safety for the students, and faculty, while maintaining the historic and cultural significance of the building.
ENGEO is proud to have received the 2021 CalGeo
Outstanding Project Award in the Public – Medium
Budget category for our work on this project.
SERVICES
• Geotechnical Exploration
• Geologic Hazard Assessment
• Seismic Analysis
• Laboratory Services
CLIENT
Rachel Dula
Fairfield Suisun Unified School District
(707) 399-5032, [email protected]
DURATION
2018-2019
PROJECT COST
$19,378,782
KEY PERSONNEL
• Ted Bayham, Principal-in-Charge
• Jeff Fippin, Geotechnical Engineer
PUBLIC SAFETY ACADEMY – NEW GYM, LIBRARY,
AND LOCKER BUILDINGS
FAIRFIELD, CA
ENGEO provided geotechnical consultation, geotechnical
testing and observation, and structural special inspection during construction of the library, gym, and locker buildings at the Public Safety Academy at Amy Blanc in Fairfield, California. ENGEO provided geotechnical and geohazard design reports for the project, which addressed the highly expansive soil conditions on the site. Improvements included a gym building, library building, locker room building, cantilever reinforced concrete site retaining walls, bio-retention areas, exterior flatwork, and landscaping areas. The structures are steel buckling-restrained braced (BRB) frame systems, with exception of the gym storage and gym lobby, which are steel special cantilever column systems.
SERVICES
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Testing and Inspections
GEOTECHNICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
WATER RESOURCES
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS
February 1, 2023 www.engeo.com
PREFERRED CLIENT FEE SCHEDULE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Effective February 2023
President......................................................................................................................................$465.00 per hour Principal .......................................................................................................................................$365.00 per hour Associate .....................................................................................................................................$305.00 per hour Subject Matter Expert..................................................................................................................$400.00 per hour Senior...........................................................................................................................................$265.00 per hour Project..........................................................................................................................................$235.00 per hour Staff..............................................................................................................................................$205.00 per hour Assistant ......................................................................................................................................$165.00 per hour Construction Services Manager II...............................................................................................$210.00 per hour* Construction Services Manager I................................................................................................$200.00 per hour* Senior Field Representative II.....................................................................................................$176.00 per hour*/** Senior Field Representative I......................................................................................................$157.00 per hour*/** Field Representative....................................................................................................................$145.00 per hour*/** Senior Laboratory Technician .....................................................................................................$180.00 per hour Laboratory Technician.................................................................................................................$160.00 per hour Senior GIS Developer..................................................................................................................$190.00 per hour Senior GIS Analyst ......................................................................................................................$185.00 per hour GIS Analyst..................................................................................................................................$175.00 per hour Senior CAD Specialist .................................................................................................................$175.00 per hour CAD Specialist.............................................................................................................................$160.00 per hour Network Administrator.................................................................................................................$250.00 per hour Project Assistant..........................................................................................................................$145.00 per hour * Two-hour minimum portal to portal and cancellations within 24 hours. * OVERTIME RATES: Rates increased by factor of 1.5 for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) Monday through Friday, and the first eight (8) hours worked on Saturday. Rates increased by factor of 2.0 for all hours worked in excess of twelve (12) Monday through Friday, all hours worked in excess of eight (8) on Saturday and all hours worked on Sunday and holidays. ** For Prevailing Wage projects, increase the hourly rate by $19. ** Rates increased by factor of 1.25 for night shift hours (hours commencing after 4:00 p.m. or before 4:00 a.m.); rates increased by factor of 1.875 (an additional factor of 1.5) for all night shift hours in excess of eight (8); rates increased by factor 2.5 for all night shift hours worked in excess of twelve (12).
ADDITIONAL SERVICES OFFERED
In addition to our core services of geotechnical, hydrologic and environmental engineering, including construction-phase testing and observation, ENGEO provides clients with services for establishment and management of Geologic Hazard Abatement Districts (GHAD) and for Entitlement and Permitting Support (EPS). For more information about these services and associated pricing, please contact ENGEO at (925) 866-9000.
OTHER FEES
• Equipment and materials will be charged in addition to the above hourly rates. • Outside Consultants, Subcontracted Services and Equipment Rental ..................................................................................................Cost plus 25% • Expert Witness, Deposition, Mediation, Arbitration, or Court Appearance (Minimum Charge).....................$2,400.00 half day, $4,800.00 full day TERMS
Invoices will be submitted at completion of work or at approximately four week intervals and are due and payable upon receipt. Statements will be issued at monthly intervals. Charges not paid within 30 days of invoice date will accrue a late charge at a rate of 1.5 percent per month. In the event it becomes necessary to commence suit to collect amount due, Client agrees to pay attorney's fees and costs, as the court may deem reasonable until amount is paid. Fees will be applicable for one year from the effective date above; thereafter, fees will be adjusted annually. Our fees will be billed using an invoice format produced by a standardized accounting software package. A more customized itemization of charges and backup data will be provided upon Client’s requests, but at additional fees. Final reports may be withheld until outstanding invoices are paid in full.
Many risks potentially affect ENGEO by virtue of entering into this agreement to perform services on behalf of client. A principal risk is the potential for human error by ENGEO. For client to obtain the benefit of a fee that includes a nominal allowance for dealing with our liability, client agree to limit ENGEO’s liability to Client and all other parties for claims arising out of our performance of the services described in the agreement. The aggregate liability will not exceed $50,000 (or ENGEO’s fee, whichever is greater, but not more than $1,000,000) for professional acts, errors, or omissions, including attorney’s fees and costs that may be awarded to the prevailing party and client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless ENGEO from and against all liabilities in excess of the monetary limit established above.
EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS CHARGES
February 1, 2023 www.engeo.com
DESCRIPTION COST PER UNIT ($) UNIT
Air Content Meter 7.00 hour
Bailers (Disposable) 10.00 each
Coatings Thickness Kit (eg. Fireproofing, Protective Paint) 30.00 hour Concrete Crack Monitor 20.00 each
Coring Machine 30.00 hour
Double-Ring Infiltrometer 50.00 hour
Electronic Water Level Indicator 5.00 hour
Engineering Analysis Software 45.00 hour
Equipment Transport(er) 100.00 hour
Exploration Equipment (Electric Auger) 50.00 hour
Floor Flatness/Floor Level Equipment 40.00 hour
Generator 15.00 hour
GIS Website Portal Subscriptions 50.00 month
GPS Handheld Device 10.00 hour
Drone Equipment 210.00 hour
Hand Auger and Soil Sampler 15.00 hour
Hydraulic Pull-Test Equipment 25.00 hour
Interface Probe 2.00 hour
Magnetic Particle Test Equipment 25.00 hour
Moisture Content Test Equipment 6.00 hour
Multi-Parameter Water Meter 15.00 hour
pH Meter/Turbidity Meter 10.00 hour
Photo Ionization Detector 20.00 hour
Reinforcing Bar Locator 100.00 hour
Sampling Tubes 10.00 each
Sand Cone Equipment and Material 5.00 hour
Schmidt Hammer 20.00 hour
Seisometer 50.00 hour
Skidmore Wilhelm Bolt Tension Calib. 40.00 hour
Slope Inclinometer/Settlement Indicator/VW Readout 50.00 hour Torque Wrench 15.00 hour
Transfer Pump 3.00 hour
Ultrasonic Equipment 50.00 hour
Vapor Emission Test Kit 40.00 kit
Vector Conversion 60.00 conversion
Vehicle, nuclear gauge, equipment, wireless communication. *Add $5.00/hr. for RTK enabled autotesting equipment. 33.00* hour Vehicle, equipment, wireless communication 23.00 hour
Vibration Monitor 1800.00 month
Water Sampling Pumps 20.00 hour
Bridge Toll actual actual
Mileage .98 mile
Parking actual actual
AutoCAD, Civil 3D, GIS, Drone Data Processing 29.00 hour Photocopies Black & White 0.25 each
Photocopies Color 11 x 17 1.50 each
Photocopies Color 8½ x 11 1.00 each
Plot - Black & White 3.00 square foot
Plot - Color 4.00 square foot
Postage actual actual
Scan - Black & White 1.50 each
Scan - Color 3.75 each
Telephone 0.50 minute
West Orange Conversion
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I
Programming & Site Analysis: Task 1 - Geotechnical Foundation Design Report Principal 8 365 $2,920.00
Associate 8 305 $2,440.00
Senior Engineer 8 265 $2,120.00
Project Engineer 24 235 $5,640.00
Staff Engineer 40 205 $8,200.00
Subcontractors $10,500.00
Subtotal Programming: 88 $31,820.00
Conceptual Design:
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 0 $0.00
Schematic Design: Task 2 - Exisiting Foundation Validation (Optional) Principal 4 365 $1,460.00
Associate 4 305 $1,220.00
Senior Engineer 4 265 $1,060.00
Project Engineer 10 235 $2,350.00
Staff Engineer 24 205 $4,920.00
Subcontractors $25,000.00
Subtotal Schematic Design: 46 $36,010.00
Planning Submittal:
Subtotal Planning Submittal: 0 $0.00
Phase II
Design Development: Task 3 - Design Development Support Principal 15 365 $5,475.00
Associate 0 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 20 235 $4,700.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 35 $10,175.00
Interior Finishes & Elevations:
Subtotal Interior Finishes & Elevations: 0 $0.00
1 / 2
West Orange Conversion
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase III
Permit Set: Task 3 - Design Development Support
Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 4 305 $1,220.00
Senior Engineer 10 265 $2,650.00
Project Engineer 10 235 $2,350.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 26 $6,950.00
Construction Set: Task 3 - Design Development Support
Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 2 305 $610.00
Senior Engineer 4 265 $1,060.00
Project Engineer 8 235 $1,880.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 16 $4,280.00
Plan Check Response: Task 3 - Design Development Support Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 2 305 $610.00
Senior Engineer 4 265 $1,060.00
Project Engineer 8 235 $1,880.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 16 $4,280.00
Bid Award:
Subtotal Bid Award: 0 $0.00
Phase IV
Construction Administration: Task 4 - Construction Administration Principal 10 365 $3,650.00
Associate 20 305 $6,100.00
Senior Engineer 30 265 $7,950.00
Project Engineer 40 235 $9,400.00
Staff Engineer 40 205 $8,200.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 140 $35,300.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 367 $128,815.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 367 0 $128,815.00
2 / 2
Westborough Addition
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase I
Programming & Site Analysis: Task 1 - Geotechnical Foundation Design Report Principal 5 365 $1,825.00
Associate 5 305 $1,525.00
Senior Engineer 8 265 $2,120.00
Project Engineer 20 235 $4,700.00
Staff Engineer 15 205 $3,075.00
Subtotal Programming: 53 $13,245.00
Conceptual Design:
Subtotal Conceptual Design: 0 $0.00
Schematic Design:
Subtotal Schematic Design: 0 $0.00
Planning Submittal:
Subtotal Planning Submittal: 0 $0.00
Phase II
Design Development: Task 3 - Design Development Support Principal 5 365 $1,825.00
Associate 0 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 10 235 $2,350.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Design Development: 15 $4,175.00
Interior Finishes & Elevations:
Subtotal Interior Finishes & Elevations: 0 $0.00
1 / 2
Westborough Addition
ESTIMATED FEES
Description of Services Hours: Hourly Rate: Total
Phase III
Permit Set: Task 3 - Design Development Support
Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 0 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 10 235 $2,350.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Permit Set: 12 $3,080.00
Construction Set: Task 3 - Design Development Support
Principal 365 $0.00
Associate 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 235 $0.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Construction Set: 0 $0.00
Plan Check Response: Task 3 - Design Development Support Principal 2 365 $730.00
Associate 0 305 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 265 $0.00
Project Engineer 8 235 $1,880.00
Staff Engineer 0 205 $0.00
Subtotal Plan Check Response: 10 $2,610.00
Bid Award:
Subtotal Bid Award: 0 $0.00
Phase IV
Construction Administration: Task 4 - Construction Administration Principal 10 365 $3,650.00
Associate 10 305 $3,050.00
Senior Engineer 30 265 $7,950.00
Project Engineer 40 235 $9,400.00
Staff Engineer 20 205 $4,100.00
Subtotal Construction Administration: 110 $28,150.00
CONSULTANT FEE TOTAL: 200 $51,260.00
Additional Costs:
Subtotal Additional Costs: 0 $0.00
FEE MAX TOTAL: 200 0 $51,260.00
2 / 2
APPENDIX D:
DORMAN ASSOCIATES
DESIGN PROCESS &
STRATEGY
APPENDIX D
DELIVERABLES
• Gather data pertaining
to site constraints,
applicable codes,
zoning & planning
requirements
• Meet with stakeholders
to understand
intentions of program
• Finalize program
• Adjacency
studies (“bubble
diagrams” based
on programming)
• Orienting building
on site to optimize
passive design
strategies
• Develop schematic
plans & 3D model,
typically 2-3 options
• Engage with MEP /
Energy Consultant to
form “Basis of Design”
for building systems
• Client Approval
• Planning Submittal
• Preliminary Budgeting
• Refine plans, design
details
• Coordinate with
Consultants
• Develop interior
design, finish & fixture
selections
• Preliminary pricing set
• Client Approval
• Revise “Basis of
Design” as needed
• Preparation of plans
for permit submittal
• Finalize details &
specifications
• Address plan check
comments
• Issue construction
set for formal bid
• Pre-construction
meeting with Project
Team
• Respond to Contractor
requests for
information, submittals
• Ongoing OAC
meetings, periodic
site visits
• Final Punch List
1. PROGRAMMING
& SITE ANALYSIS
2. CONCEPT
DESIGN
3. SCHEMATIC
DESIGN
4.DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT
5.CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
6. CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4
DESIGN PROCESS & STRATEGY
DESIGN PROCESS & STRATEGY
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Project Set-up & Background Research:
Dorman Associates will begin by inputting as-built drawings based on a survey of the existing site, assist the client with engaging consultants as needed, and prepare a Site Plan based on a site survey. The Site Survey prepared by the Civil Engineer will provide background for final site plan and eventual grading and drainage plan, required for Planning Submittal / Design Review.
Programming & Site Analysis:
When developing new classrooms and facilities, the integration of environmental and program design supports a program’s philosophy and strengthens its practices. Engaging in an intentional programming and design process provides program administrators an opportunity to assess program practices, structure, and teacher-child interactions. By creating a master plan, every program has the capacity to improve the quality of physical environments for infants, toddlers, caregivers, and families, regardless of budget. The physical environment in infant and toddler group care has a significant impact on children’s learning and relationships. Programming sessions will identify the principles and strategies for developing optimal physical environments for infants and toddlers.
During the programming process, Dorman Associates will
meet with key stakeholders and conduct a visioning session to prioritize the financial, functional, and aesthetic goals and objectives for the project to create a holistic vision of the childcare facilities. Dorman Associates will generate Bubble diagrams that demonstrate sizes and adjacencies and allow for review and comments by the client and stakeholders as part of the Programming process. The program document
shall be prepared and distributed to the client to summarize the programming phase of the project. The final program will need approval from the client before proceeding to next phase.
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
Conceptual Design:
Dorman Associates will prepare sketches illustrating
recommended room adjacencies and options. These simple
sketches shall incorporate information gathered in previous phase for program requirements and represent the scale and relationship of the project components.
Schematic Design:
Dorman Associates will provide layouts of proposed facilities for both indoor and outdoor areas showing plans, elevations, building features, and preliminary massing studies. Dorman Associates will review schematic design with the client and refine the design further including 3D elevation massing using ArchiCad. Dorman Associates will also review sustainability guidelines with the client to refine sustainability goals and incorporate sustainable elements into the plans.
Dorman Associates will present versions of Preliminary Design drawings to lead to the client’s approval, and choose one design to pursue for final Schematic Drawings.
Planning Submittal:
Dorman Associates will facilitate submitting plans to the design review committee at the City or local jurisdiction for approval.
DESIGN PROCESS & STRATEGY
INF/
TODD
PLAY
YNG. PREK
PLAY
PRE-K
PLAY
IN
F TO
D
Y.
P
K
COM
M.
RM.
Y.
P
K
Y.
P
K
Y.
P
K
TEAC
H
TEAC
H
TEAC
H TEAC
H
T
. ADMI
N
DI
R.
SECURED
PARKING
&
DROP-OFF
CLASS ROOMS
!SEPARATE AGE
APPROPRIATE ROOMS
!TEACHER AREA WITHIN
EACH RM.
!TOILETING WITHIN
EACH RM.
CORRIDOR
!SEMI-PRIVATE
!DIRECT ACCESS TO
CLASSROOMS FOR PARENT
CHECK-IN
ADMIN.
!TEACHER AND ADMIN. SPACES
!BUFFER FROM PUBLIC
!
PARKING
!ONE WAY TRAFFIC TO AID IN
TRAFFIC FLOW
!SAFE/ SECURE FOR DROP OFF,
!USERS; PARENTS W/ STROLERS,
YOUNG CHILDREN
PLAY AREAS
!DIRECT ACCESS FROM
CLASSROOMS
!SEPARATE AGE
APPROPRIATE AREAS
!
DESIGN STRATEGIES
ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS +
STANFORD CHILDCARE
4/19/16
OPT. 1 w/ Site CHRIS DORMAN, AIA
234 SHORELINE HWY
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941
415.380.7914
415.380.7915 FAX
[email protected]
12,899 sq ft
368 sq ft
5,594 sq ft
78 sq ft
154 sq ft
1,529 sq ft
5,278 sq ft
2,297 sq ft
14,675 sq ft
31,260 sq ft
390 sq ft
112 sq ft
96 sq ft
179 sq ft
476 sq ft
368 sq ft
96 sq ft
112 sq ft
179 sq ft
476 sq ft
368 sq ft
96 sq ft
112 sq ft
179 sq ft
476 sq ft
600 sq ft
29 sq ft
128 sq ft
101 sq ft
4 sq ft
18 sq ft
600 sq ft
29 sq ft
4 sq ft
18 sq ft
920 sq ft
40 sq ft
97 sq ft
101 sq ft
17 sq ft
101 sq ft
17 sq ft
97 sq ft
40 sq ft
920 sq ft
40 sq ft
97 sq ft
101 sq ft
17 sq ft
236 sq ft
119 sq ft
47 sq ft
19 sq ft
99 sq ft
416 sq ft
162 sq ft
119 sq ft
62 sq ft
INFANT CLASS ~40 s.f./ C ROOM
hild 9
TEACHERS SUP ' PORT
INF/ TODD PLAY AREA 75 s.f./ Child 21
DIAPER/TOILET
TEAC
SUPPORT HERS'
TODDLER CLASS
~40 s. ROOM
f./ Child 12
NAP AREA
9 DIAPER/TOILET
INFANT CLASSROOM ~40 s.f./ Child
9 TODDLER CLASSROOM ~40 s.f./ Child 12
NAP AREA
9 INF/ TODD PLAY AREA 75 s.f./ Child 21
INF/ TODD PLAY AREA 75 s.f./ Child 21
INFANT CLASS ~40 s.f./ C ROOM
hild 9
NAP AREA
9 TODDLER CLASS
~40 s. ROOM
f./ Child 12
TEAC
SUPPORT HERS'
DIAPER/TOILET
MOM'S RM.
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
STOR.
2 YR OLDS' CLASSROOM 40 s.f./ Child
15 TOILET
STOR.
2 YR OLDS' CLASSROOM 40 s.f./ Child
15 PRESHOOL CLASSROOM 40 s.f./ Child
23 STORAGE
TOILET
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
STOR
TOILET
TOILET
PRESHOOL CLASSROOM 40 s.f./ Child
23 PRESHOOL CLASSROOM 40 s.f./ Child
23 STORAGE
TOILET
STOR
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
ENTRY/ FAMILY AREA
J.
SMALL CONF.
DIRECTOR
TEACHER'S LOUNGE
STOR.
SHARED ADMIN.
R. PROJECT STOR.
TOILET
STANFORD CHILDCARE
4/19/16
OPT. 2 w/ Site CHRIS DORMAN, AIA
234 SHORELINE HWY
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941
415.380.7914
415.380.7915 FAX
[email protected]
4,202 sq ft
2,630 sq ft
4,168 sq ft
2,646 sq ft
2,162 sq ft
2,162 sq ft
368 sq ft
476 sq ft
368 sq ft
476 sq ft
368 sq ft
476 sq ft
368 sq ft
476 sq ft
47 sq ft
78 sq ft
119 sq ft
162 sq ft 240 sq ft
51 sq ft
272 sq ft
236 sq ft
218 sq ft
179 sq ft
24 sq ft
71 sq ft
35 sq ft
51 sq ft
240 sq ft 162 sq ft
78 sq ft
71 sq ft
236 sq ft
119 sq ft
47 sq ft
179 sq ft
218 sq ft
24 sq ft
272 sq ft
35 sq ft
3,987 sq ft
2,349 sq ft
600 sq ft
29 sq ft
128 sq ft
101 sq ft
4 sq ft
18 sq ft
600 sq ft
29 sq ft
4 sq ft
18 sq ft
17 sq ft
101 sq ft
97 sq ft
40 sq ft
920 sq ft
96 sq ft
112 sq ft
179 sq ft
96 sq ft
112 sq ft
179 sq ft
40 sq ft
97 sq ft
101 sq ft
17 sq ft
3,513 sq ft 3,455 sq ft 2,349 sq ft
600 sq ft
29 sq ft
128 sq ft
101 sq ft
4 sq ft
18 sq ft
600 sq ft
29 sq ft
4 sq ft
18 sq ft
920 sq ft
40 sq ft
97 sq ft
101 sq ft
17 sq ft
96 sq ft
112 sq ft
179 sq ft
96 sq ft
112 sq ft
179 sq ft
920 sq ft
40 sq ft
97 sq ft
101 sq ft
17 sq ft
97 sq ft
97 sq ft
3,387 sq ft
1,235 sq ft
SMALL CONFERENCE RM.
DIRECTOR
ADA
TOILET
MOM'S RM.
TOILET
TEACHER'S
LOUNGE
W/D
SHARED
ADMIN.
ENTRY
PROJECT RM.
FAMILY ROOM
J
ADA
TOILET
TEACHER'S
LOUNGE
FAMILY ROOM
DIRECTOR
SMALL CONFERENCE RM.
MOM'S RM.
ENTRY
TOILET
W/D
SHARED
ADMIN.
J
PROJECT RM.
40,733 sq ft
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
STOR.
2 YR OLDS' CLASSROOM
40 s.f./ Child
15 TOILET
STOR.
2 YR OLDS' CLASSROOM
40 s.f./ Child
15 TEACHERS' SUPPORT
STOR
TOILET
STORAGE
PRESHOOL CLASSROOM
40 s.f./ Child
23 INFANT CLASSROOM
~40 s.f./ Child
9 NAP AREA
9 TODDLER CLASSROOM
~40 s.f./ Child
12 TEACHERS' SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
INFANT CLASSROOM
~40 s.f./ Child
9 NAP AREA
9 TODDLER CLASSROOM
~40 s.f./ Child
12 TEACHERS' SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
PRESHOOL CLASSROOM
40 s.f./ Child
23 STORAGE
TOILET
STOR
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
INF/ TODD
PLAY AREA
75 s.f./ Child
21 INF/ TODD
PLAY AREA
75 s.f./ Child
21 TOILET
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
STOR
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
STOR.
2 YR OLDS' CLASSROOM
40 s.f./ Child
15 TOILET
STOR.
2 YR OLDS' CLASSROOM
40 s.f./ Child
15 PRESHOOL CLASSROOM
40 s.f./ Child
23 STORAGE
TOILET
STOR
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
CLASSROOM
INFANT
~40 s.f./ Child
9 NAP AREA
9 CLASSROOM
TODDLER
~40 s.f./ Child
12 TEACHERS' SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
CLASSROOM
INFANT
~40 s.f./ Child
9 NAP AREA
9 CLASSROOM
TODDLER
~40 s.f./ Child
12 TEACHERS' SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
PRESHOOL CLASSROOM
40 s.f./ Child
23 STORAGE
INF/ TODD
PLAY AREA
75 s.f./ Child
21 INF/ TODD
PLAY AREA
75 s.f./ Child
21 OUTSIDE
TOILET
OUTSIDE
TOILET
STOR
STANFORD CCSC
11/15/16
CLASSROOM LAYOUT
MARMOLEUM /
CARPET (INFANTS)
PLASTIC LAMINATE - CABINETRY
GENERAL WALL PAINT
ACCENT WALL PAINT
SOLID SURFACE - LOW WALL
CAPS, COUNTERTOPS
RUBBER BASE
GENERAL WALL PAINT
ACCENT WALL PAINT
SOLID SURFACE - LOW WALL
CAPS, COUNTERTOPS
CARPET
CARPET
MARMOLEUM
MARMOLEUM
TILE WAINSCOT
MARMOLEUM
TILE
PLASTIC LAMINATE -
CABINETRY
TILE WAINSCOT
DESIGN PROCESS & STRATEGY
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Upon approval of the schematic design by the Client, Dorman Associates will coordinate the Schematic Design with consultants and further develop the design to coordinate with structural and mechanical systems, prepare the preliminary building sections, and refine plans, sections, and elevations. Dorman Associates will prepare design development documents to describe fit, size, and character of the interior design. Documentation will include refined floor plans, reflected ceiling plans, power and signal plans and elevations. Coordination will occur with structural, mechanical, electrical, fire sprinklers, plumbing, and sustainability.
Dorman Associates will develop, document, and present a design and color scheme for the project. Dorman Associates will also develop alternative designs for wall treatments, ceiling treatments, lighting, glazing, millwork, etc., and prepare sketches, renderings, and color and finish boards to present proposed design schemes to the client.
Dorman Associates will participate in the budgeting process with the client and make necessary revisions to design development documents. Dorman Associates will assist in development of a final budget for FF&E in collaboration with a furniture dealership. Dorman Associates will develop scope documents, specifications, and details to describe improvements for accurate pricing by the general contractor and client approval.
52 ESCONDIDO
COTTAGE
ESCONDIDO ROAD
COMSTOCK
CIRCLE
DW DW
DW DW
DW DW
DW DW
DW DW DW
DW DW
DW
DW
DW
W/D
W/D
W/D
REF
W/D
DW F
REF
REF
REF
F
40'-0"
40'-0"
52 636 sq ft 634 sq ft 643 sq ft 647 sq ft
3,162 sq ft
7,596 sq ft
(E) FENCE
(N) FENCE
BUILDING SETBACK
(24)
TEACHER'S
LOUNGE
14'-6" x 16'-0"
7'-0" x 7'-6"
8'-0" x 9'-6"
7'-0" x 7'-6"
WAITI
AREA
NG
TRASH
(8)
PRESCHOOL CLASSROOM
45 s.f./ Child
22 990 S.F.
TOILET
PRESCHOOL CLAS
45 s
SROOM
.f./ Child
22 990 S.F.
TOILET
PRESCHOOL CLASSROOM
45 s.f./ Child
22 990 S.F.
TOILET
PRESCHOOL CLASSROOM
45 s.f./ Child
22 990 S.F.
REF REF
REF REF
REF REF
REF REF
REF REF
REF REF
W W D
TODDLER CLASSROOM
~45 s.f./ Child
12 INFANT CLASSROOM
~45 s.f./ Child
10 TODDLER CLASSROOM
~45 s.f./ Child
12 TEACHERS'
SUPPORT
TODDLER
CLASSROOM
~45 s.f./ Child
12 DIAPER/
TOILET
2YR OLD
YARD
7,984 S.F.
(147 S.F. /
CHILD)
PRESCHOOL
YARD
15,430 S.F.
(175 S.F. /
CHILD)
2 YR OLDS' CLASSROOM
45 s.f./ Child
18 2 YR OLDS'
CLASSROOM
45 s.f./ Child
18 OUTDOOR
STOR.
INFANT /
TODDLER
YARD
7,596 S.F.
(115 S.F. / CHILD)
TODDLER OPTION CLASSROOM
~45 s.f./ Child
12 TODDLER OPTION CLASSROOM
~45 s.f./ Child
12 STOR.
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
TEACHERS'
SUPPORT
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
DIRECTOR
11'-0" x 10'-0"
TOILET CONFERENCE RM.
RECEP.
WELLNESS ROOM
12'-0" x 11'-8"
11'-0" x 18'-0"
PROJECT RM. 17'-0" x 10'-9" ASST. DIRECTOR
COPY
12'-9" x 15'-0"
OPEN OFFICE
11'-0" x 16'-0"
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
STOR.
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
UNISEX
8'-6" x 7'-6" RR
2 YR OLDS'
CLASSROOM
45 s.f./ Child
18 JAN.
STORAGE
TOILET
LOBBY
35'-0" x 19'-0" ENTRANCE
CHANGING
STATION CHANGINGSTATION
STORAGE
STORAGE
TEACHER'S DESKTEACHER'S DESK
ENTRANCE
CHANGING
STATION
CHANGING
STATION STORAGE STORAGE
TEACHER'S
DESK
TEACHER'S
DESK
DIAPER/
TOILET
TEACHERS' SUPPORT
DIAPER/
TOILET
ENTRANCE
CHANGING
STATION
STORAGE
TEACHER'S
DESK
ENTRANCE ENTRANCE
STORAGE
STORAGE
CHANGING
STATION CHANGINGSTATION
TEACHER'S
DESK
ENTRANCE
STORAGE
TEACHER'S DESK
GARAGE DOOR
ENTRANCE ENTRANCE
ENTRANCE
STOR.
GARAGE DOOR GARAGE DOOR
GARAGE DOOR
STORAGE
TEACHERS'
LOUNGE
MOMS' RM.
OPEN OFFICE
ME
CONFERENCE
ROOM
ETING
RM. 12'-0" x 15'-3" 15'-3" x 14'-6"
20'-0" x 10'-0"
LAUNDRY
8'-0" x 7'-6"
MEETING
10'ROOM
-0" x 10'-0"
10'-0" x 10'-0"
14'-11" x 12'-0" RECEP.
UNISEX
RR
8'-0" x 7'-6"
9'-4" x 7'-10"
INFANT CLASSROOM
~45 s.f./ Child
10 INFANT CLASSROOM
~45 s.f./ Child
10 TODDLER OPTION
YARD
3,184 S.F.
(132 S.F. / CHILD)
SECTIONAL ANALYSIS #1
COMMENTS FROM 01.06.17 PASSIVE SYSTEMS
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE STANFORD COMMUNITY
1/16/18
FINISH BOARD - ADMIN TYPICAL FINISHES
DW FRE
LOBBY
WELLNESS ROOM
UNISEX
RESTROOM
UNISEX
RESTROOM
CONFERENCE
ROOM
TEACHERS'
LOUNGE
PROJECT
ROOM
RECEPTION
OPEN OFFICE
ASST. DIRECTOR
OFFICE
DIRECTOR
OFFICE
DW
W DR
RE
LOBBY
MEETING
ROOM
TEACHERS'
MEETING
ROOM
MEETING
ROOM
TEACHERS'
PROJECT
ROOM
LAUNDRY
ROOM
UNISEX
ROOM
Diagonal
45°
14.5 mm
102.53 mm
Vertical
14.5 mm
45°
ADMIN GENERAL WALL PAINT
KELLY MOORE
KMW23 BÉCHAMEL
ACOUSTIC PANELS @ ADMIN
OPT. B
WILSON ART; Field Elm
CABINET LAMINATE
OPT. C
WILSON ART; White Cypress
*OPT. A
WILSON ART; Beigewood
INTERFACE - Ground Waves Verse
#104903 Gravel/Colors - Ashlar pattern
CARPET FLOOR @ WELLNESS ROOM, CONFERENCE ROOM, DIRECTOR OFFICE, ASST. DIRECTOR OFFICE, OPEN OFFICE, PROJECT ROOM *OPT. A
TO MARKET - Urban Plank - TM 11-117 Tan Oak
RESILIENT PLANK FLOORING @ ADMIN
OPT. B
TO MARKET - Urban Plank - TM 11-305 NATURAL SAND
ADMIN CEILING WALL PAINT
ADMIN RESTROOMS
LAUNDRY - RESILIENT FLOORING
FORBO - Marmoleum - t5230 white wash
or same as classrooms
KELLY MOORE
KMW48 WHIPPED CREAM
BAUX
DIAGONAL PANEL
OPT. A - MOSA - Global Collection
FLOOR: #75080 V - 12" x 12"
WALL: #75090 V & accents of #75080V - 6" x 6"
*OPT. B - MOSA
FLOOR: #75080 V & #75080 V (Global Collection) 12" x 12" WALL: KHO LIANG LE Collection 4" x 4"
BAUX
VERTICAL PANEL
A7.6
REVISIONS
SHEET
DATE: 6/12/18
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
C 28300
CHRIS DORMAN L I CENSED ARCH I TECT
STAT E OF CAL I FORN I A
12-31-17
PRESENTATION
061218 140 COMSTOCK CIRCLE STANFORD, CA 94305
APN: 142-04-023
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE STANFORD COMMUNITY
CHRIS DORMAN, AIA
234 SHORELINE HWY
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941
415.380.7914
415.380.7915 FAX
[email protected]
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Upon approval of the design development documents by
the Client, Dorman Associates and their consultants will prepare final construction documents of sufficient detail for submitting to the City for a building permit, including Schematic Layouts for plumbing, mechanical, and Electrical drawings.
Dorman Associates and their consultants will also prepare a Construction Set, including plans and specifications
that set forth the requirements for construction, including specification sheets to document standards of care required for construction, as well as materials specified to achieve the finishes shown on the plans.
Dorman Associates and their consultants will produce plans and specifications that describe full scope of construction for the space, coordinated with MEP/ Structural / Furniture / etc., finalize sustainability scope, respond to questions that may arise during permit process, revise documents in response to plan check comments, and provide a full set of Construction Documents (100% complete) to General
Contractor with revisions due to plan check comments.
DESIGN PROCESS & STRATEGY
1 C 28300 12-31-17
CHRIS DORMAN L I CENSED ARCH I TECT
STAT E OF CAL I FORN I A
A1.1
REVISIONS
SHEET
DATE: 7/6/17
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
COVER SHEET
140 COMSTOCK CIRCLE
STANFORD, CA 94305
APN: 142-04-023
BUILDING/ QUAD NUMBER: 10-426 , STANFORD PROJECT NUMBER: 5207
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE STANFORD COMMUNITY
CHRIS DORMAN, AIA
234 SHORELINE HWY
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941
415.380.7914
415.380.7915 FAX
[email protected]
10/27/17 B.P.
RESUBMITTAL
MAX. PROPOSED BLDG. HT. 18 FEET
PARKING
STANDARD PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 29
COMPACT PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 0
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 2
TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 32
ADDRESS:
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB-SPRINKLERED
BUILDING CODE:
SCOPE OF WORK: This project consolidates existing
childcare programs from DAPER and
East Campus into a new set of
childcare buildings and parking in the
East Campus Development District.
The project is located across from the
Bing Nursery School and Escondido
Elementary School. The project will
add zero net new academic sf, use 1,152
net new childcare sf, and will have 32
dedicated parking stalls.
CCSC COMPLEX,
140 COMSTOCK CIRCLE
STANFORD, CA 94305
APN: 142-04-023
ZONING:
2016 CBC, 2016 CMC, 2016
CPC, 2016 CEC, 2016 CEES,
2016 CGBS, 2016 CFC
A 1
OCCUPANCY GROUP: E - SEE CODE SHEET A1.5
OWNER:
ARCHITECT:
CIVIL
ENGINEER:
BKF ENGINEERS
MITCH BURLEY
1730 N. FIRST STREET, SUITE 600
SAN JOSE, CA 95112
P: 408.467.9100
F: 408.467.9199
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT:
DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
CHRIS DORMAN, AIA
234 SHORELINE HWY
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941
P:415.380.7914
F: 415.380.7915
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
CONTACT: BRAD WELLS
3160 PORTER DRIVE
STANFORD,, CA 94305
P: 650.723.7327
MILLER COMPANY LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS, INC.
JEFFREY MILLER
1585 FOLSOM STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103
P:415 252-7288
F :415 795-1079
37°25'22.4"N 122°09'22.0"W
GENERAL
APN :
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT :
142-04-023
EAST CAMPUS
DEMOLITION AREA : 7,129 SQUARE FEET
LAND USE DESIGNATION : ACADEMIC CAMPUS
BUILDING AREA : 18,518 SQUARE FEET
GUP AREA : 18,253 SQUARE FEET
PARCEL SIZE : 81.71 ACRES STRUCTURAL
ENGINEER:
BKG STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
RYAN BILLANTE, PE
1155 BROADWAY STREET, SUITE 205,
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063
P: 650 489-9224
ELECTRICAL
ENGINEER:
LIBRA ELECTRIC, CO.
HENRY ROSALES
3200 OSGOOD COMMON
FREMONT, CA 9459
P: 510-353-1260
F: 510-353-1263
MECHANICAL
ENGINEER:
DESIGN HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING,
INC.
KEVIN NGUYEN
1460 TULLY RD., SUITE 609
SAN JOSE, CA 95122
P: 408-286-3329
F: 408-516-9291
PLUMBING
ENGINEER:
LYONS BROS. PLUMBING & DESIGN
JOHN LYONS
1020 CHESTNUT ST.
SAN JOSE, CA 95110
P: 408-297-8893
F: 408-297-8895
GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER:
CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP
ERIN L. STEINER, P.E., G.E.
1259 OAKMEAD PARKWAY
SUNNYVALE, CA 94085
P: 408 245-4600 x106
C: 408 464-8295
STANFORD PROJECT NUMBER 5207
QUAD/BUILDING NUMBER : 10-426
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 2
BICYCLE PARKING
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 4
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 0
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 32
LONG-TERM
SHORT-TERM
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
(WITH SPACE FOR CHILDREN'S TRAILERS)
10 TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 32
CLEAN AIR VEHICLE STALLS REQUIRED
EV CHARGING STALLS REQUIRED
EV CHARGING STALLS PROVIDED
PARKING STALL MARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH
GBC 2016 SECTION 5.106.5.2.1
3 CLEAN AIR VEHICLE STALLS PROVIDED 3
2 2
BUILDING ID: 10-426
ELECTRICAL SHEETS
SHEET #
E-0
E-0.11
E-0.12
E-0.21
E-0.22
E-0.41
E-0.51
E-1.1
E-1.2
E-2.1
E-2.2
E-3.1
E-4.1
E-4.2
DRAWING
GENERAL INFORMATION
TITLE 24 INDOOR LTG
TITLE 24 INDOOR LTG
TITLE 24 OUTDOOR LTG
TITLE 24 OUTDOOR LTG
SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
PANEL SCHEDULES
WEST WING LIGHTING PLAN
EAST WING LIGHTING PLAN
WEST WING POWER PLAN
EAST WING POWER PLAN
SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN
WEST WING HVAC POWER PLAN
EAST WING HVAC POWER PLAN
CIVIL SHEETS
SHEET #
C0.2
C1.1
C2.1
C3.1
C4.1
C5.1
C6.1
C6.2
C6.3
C7.1
C7.2
C7.3
C7.4
DRAWING
COUNTY NOTE SHEET
EXISTING CONDITION PLAN
DEMOLITION PLAN
GRADING PLAN
UTILITY PLAN
STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
BLUEPRINT FOR A CLEAN BAY
N
N N
ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS
SHEET #
A1.1
A1.2
A1.3
A1.4
A1.5
A1.5.1
A1.6
A1.7
A1.8
A1.9
A1.10
A1.11
A1.12
A1.13
A1.14
A1.15
A1.16
A1.17
A1.18
A1.19
A1.20
A1.21
A1.22
A1.23
A1.24
A1.25
A1.26
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
A2.4
A2.5
A2.6
A2.7
A2.8
A2.9
A3.1
A3.2
A3.3
A3.4
A3.5
A4.1
A4.2
A4.3
A4.4
A4.5
A4.6
A4.7
A4.8
A4.9
A4.10
A4.11
A4.12
A5.1
A5.2
A5.3
A5.4
DRAWING
COVER SHEET
SITE PLAN
SITE CONTEXT
GENERAL NOTES & ADA NOTES
CODE ANALYSIS & ADA DETAILS
GENERAL NOTES & CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL, ADA DETAILS
CODE & FIRE LIFE SAFETY SITE PLAN
CODE & FIRE LIFE SAFETY WEST WING PLAN
CODE & FIRE LIFE SAFETY EAST WING PLAN
CALGREEN MANDATORY MEASURES
CHECKLIST - COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
CALGREEN MANDATORY MEASURES
CHECKLIST
CALGREEN MANDATORY MEASURES
CHECKLIST
CALGREEN MANDATORY MEASURES
CHECKLIST
TREE PROTECTION, REMOVAL &
RELOCATION PLAN
LOGISTICS PLAN
TITLE 24 - MECHANICAL
TITLE 24 - ELECTRICAL - INDOOR LTG
TITLE 24 - ELECTRICAL - INDOOR LTG
TITLE 24 - ELECTRICAL - OUTDOOR LTG
TITLE 24 - ELECTRICAL - OUTDOOR LTG
TITLE 24 - PLUMBING
TITLE 24 - BUILDING 1 ENVELOPE
TITLE 24 - BUILDING 1 ENVELOPE
TITLE 24 - BUILDING 2 ENVELOPE
TITLE 24 - BUILDING 2 ENVELOPE
TITLE 24 - BUILDING 3 ENVELOPE
TITLE 24 - BUILDING 3 ENVELOPE
WEST WING PLAN
EAST WING PLAN
WEST WING ROOF PLAN
EAST WING ROOF PLAN
REFLECTED CEILING LEGEND, NOTES, &
SCHEDULE
WEST WING REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
EAST WING REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
WEST WING FINISH PLAN
EAST WING FINISH PLAN
SITE ELEVATIONS
WEST WING ELEVATIONS
2 YEAR OLDS BUILDING ELEVATIONS
PRESCHOOL/ADMIN BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
ENLARGED BUILDING ELEVATIONS
BUILDING SECTIONS @ INFANT/TODDLER
CLASSROOMS
BUILDING SECTIONS @ MAIN ADMIN
BUILDING SECTIONS @ 2 YEAR OLD &
PRESCHOOL CLASSROOMS
BUILDING SECTIONS @ PRESCHOOL
CLASSROOMS & ADMIN
WALL SECTIONS @ TODDER / INFANT
CLASSROOMS
WALL SECTIONS @ TODDER / INFANT
CLASSROOMS
WALL SECTIONS @ TODDER / INFANT
CLASSROOMS & MAIN ADMIN
WALL SECTIONS @ MAIN ADMIN & 2 YEAR
OLD CLASSROOMS
WALL SECTIONS @ 2 YEAR OLD
CLASSROOMS
WALL SECTIONS @ PRESCHOOL
CLASSROOMS
WALL SECTIONS @ PRESCHOOL
CLASSROOMS & ADMIN
WALL SECTIONS @ PRESCHOOL
CLASSROOM 159
DOOR, WINDOW, & APPLIANCE SCHEDULES
FF&E SCHEDULES
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS @ INFANT/
TODDLER POD #118, #123, #125, #130, #133,
#138
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS @ TODDLER
OPTION POD #112, #116
ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS
SHEET #
A5.5
A5.6
A5.7
A5.8
A5.9
A5.10
A5.11
A7.1
A7.2
A7.3
A7.4
A7.5
A7.6
A7.7
A8.1
DRAWING
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS @ 2 Y/O POD #170,
#174
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS @ 2 Y/O POD #166;
#167, #168, #164
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS @ PRESCHOOL
POD #147, #151, #155
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS @ PRESCHOOL
POD #159
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS @ ADMIN 1
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS @ ADMIN 2
ELEVATIONS @ EXT. DIAPER CHANGING
STATIONS & KITCHENETTE #165
DETAILS (TYPICAL)
DETAILS (COVERED WALKWAYS)
DETAILS
DETAILS
DETAILS
DETAILS
DETAILS
TRASH ENCLOSURE
MECHANICAL SHEETS
SHEET #
M0.0
M0.1
M1.0
M1.1
M2.0
M2.1
M3.0
M4.0
DRAWING
MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES,
CAL GREEN NOTES, & SCOPE OF WORK
MECHANICAL TITLE 24
MECHANICAL ROOF PLAN - WEST WING
MECHANICAL ROOF PLAN- EAST WING
MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN - WEST WING
MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN - EAST WING
MECHANICAL DETAILS & SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL REFRIGERANT PIPING
DIAGRAM-MITSUBISHI SPLIT SYSTEMS
PLUMBING SHEETS
SHEET #
P0.0
P1.0
P2.0
P2.1
P2.2
P2.3
P2.4
P3.0
P3.1
P3.2
P3.3
P3.4
P4.0
P4.1
P5.0
P5.1
P6.0
P6.1
P7.0
DRAWING
FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND GENERAL NOTES
SITE PLUMBING UTILITY PLAN
ENLARGED PLANS 110, 111, 114, 115 WASTE &
VENT
ENLARGED PLANS 121, 122, 128, 129, 136, 137
WASTE & VENT
ENLARGED PLANS 164, 167, 171, 172 WASTE
AND VENT
ENLARGED PLANS 146, 149, 152, 153 WASTE
AND VENT
ENLARGED PLANS 156, 157, 160, 161 WASTE
AND VENT
ENLARGED PLANS 110, 111, 114, 115 WATER
SUPPLY
ENLARGED PLANS 121, 122, 128, 129, 136, 137
WATER SUPPLY
ENLARGED PLANS 164, 167, 171, 172 WATER
SUPPLY
ENLARGED PLANS 146, 149, 152, 153 WATER
SUPPLY
ENLARGED PLANS 156, 157, 160, 161 WATER
SUPPLY
ISOMETRIC DIAGRAMS WASTE AND VENT
ISOMETRIC DIAGRAMS WASTE AND VENT
ISOMETRIC DIAGRAMS WATER SUPPLY
ISOMETRIC DIAGRAMS WATER SUPPLY
DETAILS
DETAILS
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
STRUCTURAL SHEETS
SHEET #
S0.0
S1.0
S1.1
S1.2
S2.1
S2.2
S2.3
S2.4
S3.0
S4.0
DRAWING
GENERAL NOTES
TYPICAL CONCRETE DETAILS
TYPICAL WOOD DETAILS
TYPICAL WOOD DETAILS
WEST WING FOUNDATION PLAN
WEST WING ROOF PLAN
EAST WING FOUNDATION PLAN
EAST WING ROOF PLAN
FOUNDATION DETAILS
FRAMING DETAILS
LANDSCAPE SHEETS
SHEET #
L1.0
L1.1
L1.2
L2.0
L2.1
L3.0
L3.1
L3.2
L3.3
L4.0
L4.1
L4.2
L5.0
L5.1
L5.2
L5.3
L5.4
L5.5
L5.6
L5.7
L5.8
DRAWING
LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SCHEDULE
LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PLAN WEST
LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PLAN EAST
LANDSCAPE LAYOUT WEST
LANDSCAPE LAYOUT EAST
IRRIGATION PLAN WEST
IRRIGATION PLAN EAST
IRRIGATION NOTES & LEGEND
IRRIGATION DETAILS
LANDSCAPE PLANT SCHEDULE
LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN WEST
LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN EAST
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILS
PLAY STRUCTURE CONCEPT PLANS
1 SITE VICINITY 2 SITE CONTEXT
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 1
GYP.
H.B.
H.C.
HD.
HDR.
HDWD.
HDWE.
H.M.
DETAIL / TITLE
SHEET NUMBER
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
ELEVATION NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
2 A
DOOR ID
SEE DOOR SCHED.
WINDOW ID
SEE WINDOW SCHED.
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
ELEVATION NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
NOTE: SEE ELEC. DWGS
FOR ADD. SYMBOLS
SYMBOLS
REVISION (NO.)
CL
PL
CENTERLINE
HORIZ.
H.R.
HT.
I.D.
INSUL.
INT.
JAN.
JT.
DIAMETER
PROPERTY LINE
OR PLATE
o
LT.
MAX.
M.B.
M.C.
MECH.
MEMB.
MET.
MFR.
MH.
MIN.
MIR.
MISC.
M.O.
M.R.
MTD.
MUL.
(N)
N.
N.I.C.
NO.
NOM.
N.T.S.
O.A.
OBS.
O.C.
O.D.
OFF.
OPNG.
OPP.
OSB.
O/
P.
PL.
PLYWD.
PR.
PRCST.
PT.
PTN.
GL.
GND.
GR.
G.S.M.
Glass
Ground
Grade
Galvanized Sheet Metal
KIT.
LAB.
LAM.
LAV.
LKR.
Gypsum
Hose Bibb
Hollow Core/Handicap
Head
Header
Hardwood
Hardware
Hollow Metal
Horizontal
Hand Rail
Height
Inside Diameter (Dim)
Light
Maximum
Machine Bolt
Medicine Cabinet
Mechanical
Membrane
Metal
Manufacturer
Manhole
Minimum
Mirror
Miscellaneous
Masonry Opening
Moisture Resistant
Mounted
Mullion
New
North
Not In Contract
Number
Nominal
Not To Scale
Overall
Obscure
On Center
Outside Diameter (Dim.)
Office
Opening
Opposite
Oriented Strand Board
Over
Pole/Pantry
Plate
Plywood
Pair
Pre-Cast
Point
Partition
Insulation
Interior
Janitor
Joint
Kitchen
Laboratory
Laminate
Lavatory
Locker
A.B.
A.C.
ACOUS.
A.D.
ADD.
ADJ.
AGGR.
ALUM.
ARCH.
ASPH.
B.B.
BD.
BLDG.
BLK.
BLKG.
BM.
BOT.
BRKT.
B.U.
CAB.
C.B.
CEM.
CER.
C.I.
C.G.
CLG.
CLKG.
CL.
CLR.
CNTR.
C.O.
COL.
CONC.
CONN.
CONST.
CONT.
CORR.
CTR.
CTSK.
D.
DBL.
DEPT.
DET.
D.F.
Anchor Bolt
Air Conditioning
Acoustical
Area Drain
Added/Additional
Aggregate
Aluminum
Architectural
Asphalt
Bread Board
Board
Building
Block
Blocking
Beam
Bottom
Bracket
Built-Up
Cabinet
Catch Basin
Cement
Ceramic
Cast Iron
Corner Guard
Ceiling
Caulking
Closet
Clear
Counter
Cased Openings
Column
Concrete
Connection
Construction
Continuous
Corridor
Center
Countersunk
Dryer
Double
Department
Detail
ABBREVIATIONS
UR.
VERT.
V.G.D.F.
Adjustable or Adjacent
AFC
DIA.
DIM.
EQ.
Drinking fountain or
Douglas Fir
DISP.
DN.
DR.
DS.
DW.
Q.T.
R.
RAD.
R.A.
R.D.
REF.
REFR.
REG.
REINF.
REQ.
RESIL.
RTNG.
RM.
R.O.
RSN.
RWD.
R.W.L.
S.
S.C.
SCHED.
S.D.
SECT.
SHR.
SHT.
SHTG.
Quarry Tile
Riser or right
Radius
Return Air Grill
Roof Drain
Reference
Refrigerator
Register
Reinforced
Required
Resilient
Retaining (Wall)
Room
Rough Opening
Resawn
Redwood
Rain Water Leader
South or Shelf
Solid Core
Schedule
Smoke Detector
Section
Shower
Sheathing
Sheet
SIM.
SL.
SPEC.
SQ.
S.S.
S.C.D.
S.E.D.
S.M.D.
Similar
Sliding
Specification
Square
Stainless Steel
See Civil Drawing
See Electrical Dwg
See Mechanical Dwg
S.S.D.
STA.
STL.
STOR.
STRL.
SUSP.
SYM.
T.
T.& G.
T.B.
T.C.
TEL.
TER.
THK.
THR.
TN.
T.O.
T.O.P.
T.P.
T.P.H.
T.V.
T.O.W.
T/U/P
TYP.
UNF.
U.O.N.
See Structural Dwg
Station
Steel
Storage
Structural
Suspended
Symmetrical
Tile, Top or Tread
Tongue and Groove
Towel Bar
Top of Curb
Telephone
Terrazzo
Thick
Threshold
Toenail
Top of
Top of Plate
Top of Pavement
Toilet Paper Holder
Television
Top of Wall
Touch-Up & Paint Wall
Typical
Unfinished
Unless Otherwise Noted
VEST.
Urinal
Vertical
Vestibule
W
W/
W.C.
WD.
WND.
WP.
WSCT.
WT.
W.W.F.
Vertical Grain
West, Washer or Water
With
Water Closet
Wood
Window
Waterproof
Wainscot
Weight
Welded Wire Fabric
Arc Fault Circuit
DWG.
DWR.
E.
(E)
EA.
EXP.JT.
EL.
ELEC.
ELEV.
EMER.
ENCL.
E.P.B.
Diameter
Dimension
Dispenser
Down
Door
Downspout
Dishwasher
Drawing
Drawer
East
Existing
Each
Expansion Joint
Elevation
Electrical
Elevation
Emergency
Enclosure
Electrical Panelboard
EQUIP.
EXP.
EXST.
EXT.
F.A.
F.A.U.
F.B.
F.C.
F.D.
FDN.
F.E.
F.E.C.
F.F.
F.H.C.
F.H.W.S.
FIN.
FL.
FLASH.
FLUOR.
F.O.C.
F.O.F.
F.O.S.
FP.
FPR.
FT.
FTG.
FURR.
FXGL.
G.
GA.
GALV.
G.B.
G.D.
G.F.I.
Equal
Equipment
Expansion or Exposed
Existing
Exterior
Fire Alarm
Forced Air Unit
Flat Bar
Fan Coil
Floor Drain
Foundation
Fire Extinguisher
Fire Extinguisher Cab.
Finish Floor
Fire Hose Cabinet
Flat Head Wood Screw
Finish
Floor
Flashing
Fluorescent
Face of Concrete
Face of Finish
Face of Stud
Fireplace
Fireproof
Foot or Feet
Footing
Furring
Fixed Glass
Gas
Gauge
Galvanized
Grab Bar
Garbage Disposal
Ground Fault Interrupter
NORTH ARROW
DETAIL/TITLE NUMBER
-UNDERGROUND FIRE SERVICE
MAINS (FIRE SPRINKLER AND
HYDRANT(S)
-ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM,
ALARMS AND SECURITY
V.T.R. Vent to Roof
HWY 82
EL CAMINO REAL
BETTY MELTZER
MEMORIAL HWY
STANFORD AVE
ESCONDIDO ROAD
OLMSTED RD.
SERRA ST.
OLMSTED RD.
KNIGHT WAY
CAMPUS DR.
CAMPUS DR. BOWDOIN ST.
COLLEGE AVE
REAL
NORTH
REAL
NORTH
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE STANFORD COMMUNITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT DIRECTORY DRAWING INDEX
SECTIONS
SECTION NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
A EXTERIOR FINISH ID
SEE EXTERIOR FINISH
SCHED.
2-1 GRID LINE ID
DEFERRED SUBMITTALS
47008, 47009 & 47010
SANTA CLARA COUNTY PLAN
CHECK NOS.:
STD. Standard
O.H. Overhang
CVRD Covered
WLKWY Walkway
CCSC BUILDING 1: 140 COMSTOCK
CIR., ID: 10-426A, PLAN CHECK#
47008
CCSC BUILDING 2: 142 COMSTOCK
CIR., ID: 10-426B, PLAN CHECK#
47009
CCSC BUILDING 3: 144 COMSTOCK
CIR., ID: 10-426C, PLAN CHECK#
47010
03/2/18 B.P.
RESUBMITTAL
NEW CCSC CHILDCARE CENTER NEW CCSC CHILDCARE CENTER
COMSTOCK CIR.
1 C 28300 12-31-17
CHRIS DORMAN L I CENSED ARCH I TECT
STAT E OF CAL I FORN I A
A2.1
REVISIONS
SHEET
DATE: 7/6/17
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
WEST WING
PLAN
140 COMSTOCK CIRCLE
STANFORD, CA 94305
APN: 142-04-023
BUILDING/ QUAD NUMBER: 10-426 , STANFORD PROJECT NUMBER: 5207
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE STANFORD COMMUNITY
CHRIS DORMAN, AIA
234 SHORELINE HWY
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941
415.380.7914
415.380.7915 FAX
[email protected]
10/27/17 B.P.
RESUBMITTAL
x 57.89
x 57.94
x 57.87
x 57.81
x 57.81
x 58.21
x 55.8
x
1 55.81
x 55.81
x 55.81
x 55.81
x 55.81
x 59.36
x 58.93
x 59.02
x 58.81
x 58.59
Y D
H
x EP 55.93
HB
D
HB
D
HB
D
HB
D
HB
D
14" SLIDE TRANSITION
PLATFORM
R56 90
ESCONDIDO ROAD
C EL NA I A R/
AC R OP L O E/ V
C EL NA I A R/ AC R OP L O E/ V
C EL NA I A R/ AC R OP L O E/ V
3 A3.1
N
1 PROJECT
NORTH
SHEET NOTES
1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF FRAMING U.O.N.
2. SEE SHEETS A1.4 & A1.5 FOR GENERAL CODES, ADA
NOTES & TYPICAL MOUNTING HEIGHTS.
3. FOR EXTERIOR FINISH SURFACE INFORMATION, S.L.D.
4. FOR EXTERIOR FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS AND
ROADWAY INFORMATION, S.C.D.
5. TOILETS ARE FOR CHILDREN'S USE U.O.N.
1 DOOR ID
SEE DOOR SCHEDULE ON A5.1
A WINDOW ID
SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE ON A5.1
DW
2 2
18 2222
22 3
A G 1
E E
A G 1
C
3 A
G
1 A
G
1 3
A G A 1 G 1
B
A G 1 A G 1
E F
3 E F
3 3
E F
3 E
E
E
3 5
A4.1
2 A4.1
5 A4.1
2 A4.1
DW DW
DW DW
DW
DW
DW DW
6 6 6
6 S
14 13
W
33 32
34 35
7 7
7 21
6 6 66
7 7
66 66
7 17
7 7
AC
30 31
20 R
36 12
AD
D D D
D
D
U U
F
W/D
W/D
RE
6 66
6 U
16 15
T
2 A4.2
2 A4.2
W/D
U
1 A5.3
1 A5.4
3 A5.9
8 A5.9
1 A5.9
2 A5.9
1 A5.11 1
A5.11
1 A5.11
1 A5.3
1 A5.3
1 A5.4 1
A5.4
3 A3.5
3 A3.5
3 A3.5
1'-6" 18'-11" 15'-11 1/2" 10'-6 1/2" 11'-5 1/2" 36'-0" 10'-1 1/2" 11'-5 1/2" 45'-10" 11'-5 1/2" 10'-6" 11'-5 1/2" 10'-3 1/2" 12'-5" 23'-4" 11'-8" 10'-6 1/2" 11'-5 1/2" 36'-0" 12'-2" 8'-6 1/2"
1'-6"
80'-2 1/2"
19'-0"
10'-1"
9 1/2"
24'-6 1/2" 6'-2 1/2"
10'-6" CLR 8'-9"
2'-2 1/2"
4'-10" 5'-8 1/2"
4'-11" 5'-8 1/2"
12'-0" 5'-3"
9'-3 1/2" 5'-5 1/2"
15'-0" 16'-9" 12'-4"
6'-0" 3'-0"
10'-1"
4'-1"4'-1"
4'-0" 6'-0"
3'-0" 6'-0"
9'-5 1/2"
4'-0" 6'-0"
4'-1"
6'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 6'-0"
22'-0" 10'-6" 18'-0"
8'-2"
8'-5 1/2"
10'-4 1/2"
4'-7 1/2"
2'-11 1/2"
4'-8 1/2" 4'-1"
3'-8"
8'-1 1/2"
4'-7 1/2"
2'-11 1/2"
10'-4 1/2"
4'-8 1/2" 4'-1"
3'-8"
8'-1 1/2"
4'-1"
+/- 7'-11"
2'-6" 4'-7 1/2"
10'-4 1/2"
+/- 7'-11"
+/- 7'-11"
4'-1" 4'-8 1/2"
4'-0"
8'-1 1/2"
3'-8"
4'-8 1/2" 4'-1"
2'-1 1/2"
4'-1/2"
8'-6"
6'-5"
7'-1 1/2" 4'-5" 12'-8 1/2"
2'-0"
12'-9" 2'-4 1/2"
6'-0" 3'-0"
6'-0" 3'-0"
9'-1"
9'-1"
4'-2"
9'-1"9'-1"
4'-5 1/2"
4'-1 1/2"
4'-10" 5'-8 1/2"
2'-2 1/2"
5'-7"
7'-10 1/2" 13'-11"
10'-6"
CLR
4'-5 1/2" 8'-3"
2'-0"
7'-11 1/2"
4'-8 1/2"
14'-9 1/2" 11'-4" 16'-8" 7'-11 1/2"
14'-10" 11'-4" 8'-10" 7'-11 1/2"
9'-6" 9'-6 1/2" 7'-11 1/2"
14'-9" 14'-9 1/2" 11'-4" 14'-9 1/2" 15'-0" 16'-1 1/2" 11'-4" 13'-1" 7'-11 1/2"
7'-11 1/2"
3" 28'-5" 17'-3" 12'-3"
1'-7" 1'-6"
17'-6" 1'-6"
80'-3"
6'-11" 5'-5 1/2"
7'-1/2"
6'-7 1/2" 3'-1 1/2"
253'-0"
253'-0"
6'-8" 2'-3 1/2"
2'-8"
5'-0" 5'-6 1/2"
10'-6" CLR 8'-9" 16'-4" 2'-8"
5'-0"
23'-5" 4'-9" 5'-8 1/2" 5'-1/2"
2'-2 1/2"
5'-9"
5'-11"
6'-2 1/2"
7'-7 1/2" 6'-3"
14'-6 1/2" 7'-11 1/2"
2'-8"
5'-0"
7'-1" 5'-6 1/2"
2'-3"
9'-6 1/2" 9'-4 1/2"
29'-0" 25'-6" 57'-1 1/2"
10'-6"
20'-7 1/2"
11'-3 1/2"
23'-2"
5"
6'-3 1/2"
11'-5"
7'-11"
25'-6"
6 A4.1
7 A4.1
6 A4.1
1 A3.2
2 A3.2
3 A3.2
6 A3.2
5 A3.2
5 A3.5
C
A
B 3
A3.5
ALIGN EDGE OF
WND. ABOVE W/
EDGE OF DR.
ALIGN EDGE OF
WND. ABOVE W/
EDGE OF DR.
ALIGN EDGE OF
WND. ABOVE W/
EDGE OF DR.
ALIGN EDGE OF
WND. ABOVE W/
EDGE OF DR.
ALIGN EDGE OF
WND. ABOVE W/
EDGE OF DR.
ALIGN EDGE OF
WND. ABOVE W/
EDGE OF DR.
ALIGN EDGE OF
WND. ABOVE W/
EDGE OF DR.
ALIGN EDGE
OF WND.
ABOVE W/
EDGE OF DR.
ALIGNALIGN
ALIGN
Ç Ç Ç Ç
Ç
Ç
Ç Ç
Ç
Ç
Ç
Ç
Ç Ç
Ç Ç
Ç Ç
Ç Ç
Ç Ç
Ç Ç
ROOF ABOVE,
TYP.
2% MAXSLOPE
2% MAXSLOPE
2% MAX
SLOPE
ROOF ABOVE,
TYP.
FIRE
RISER'S
ROOM
108.2
OPP.
HAND
OPP.
HAND
SIM.
SIM.
SIM.
SIM. SIM. SIM.
SIM. SIM. SIM. SIM.
SIM.
SIM. SIM. SIM.
OPP.
HAND
SIM.
Ç
D.S. D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S. D.S. D.S. D.S. D.S.
D.S. D.S. D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
D.S.
B
A C
SIM
B
A C
SIM
B
A C
SIM
TODDLER OPTION CLASSROOM
112
PROJECT ROOM
108
TEACHERS'
LOUNGE
109
LOBBY
101
CONFERENCE ROOM
103
RECEPTION
104
DIRECTOR OFFICE
105
ASST. DIRECTOR OFFICE
106 OPEN OFFICE
107
TOILET
110
TOILET
111
STORAGE
113
TODDLER OPTION CLASSROOM
116
STORAGE
117
DIAPER/
TOILET
115
TEACHER
SUPPORT
114 TODDLER CLASSROOM
123
STORAGE
124
INFANT CLASSROOM
118
STORAGE
120
DIAPER/
TOILET
122
TEACHER
SUPPORT
121
NAP AREA
119
STORAGE
131
INFANT CLASSROOM
125
STORAGE
127
DIAPER/
TOILET
129
TEACHER
SUPPORT
128
NAP AREA
126
STORAGE
139
INFANT CLASSROOM
133
STORAGE
135
DIAPER/
TOILET
137
TEACHER
SUPPORT
136
NAP AREA
134
MECHANICAL
132
TODDLER CLASSROOM
130
TODDLER CLASSROOM
138
P
V
19 P
P
7'-3"
3 A4.1
3 A4.1
AJ
2 4
1.1 AI
AG
AD
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14.1 15 16 17 18 19
AB
AA AA
AE
AC
AF
AH
BA
BB
BC
BD
BE
AI.1
5.1 8.1 11.1
AH
AF
BD
BE
1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
14 AA.1
AB.1
1 1.1
REF
REF
REF REF
W/D
REF REF
REF REF
N
8 N
O O
Q
N
8 N
O O
N
8 N
O O
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
4 A7.5
10 A5.9
9 A5.9
1'-6" 29'-0" 5'-11" 22'-0" 10'-6"
CLR
25'-1/2" 22'-1/2" 10'-6"
CLR
46'-9 1/2" 10'-6"
CLR
13'-6" 44'-1/2" 11'-8"
10'-1" 7'-10"
1'-3 1/2"
3'-1 1/2"
1'-9 1/2"
3'-9" 6'-9 1/2"
13'-2"
10'-6" CLR 8'-9" 12'-7 1/2"
13'-2"
3'-2"
CLR 3'-2"
CLR
2 A4.1
5 A4.1
1 A4.1
3 A4.2
1 A4.2
4 A4.2
8 A4.1
8 A4.1
2 A4.1
5 A4.1
1 A4.1
2 A4.1
1 A4.1
7 A4.1
7 A4.1
9 A4.1
9 A7.1
4 A3.2
IT CUBIT
P
P
COPIER
Ç
Ç
Ç
Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç
Ç
Ç Ç
Ç
Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç
P
P
TI TI BU C
WELLNESS ROOM
102
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
WEST WING PLAN
1 A7.4
3 A7.1
4 A7.1
A7.1
4 EXT. INT.
WALL LEGEND
NEW 2x4 PARTITION WALL
NEW 42" PARTIAL HT. WALL
NEW 2x6 WALL
PLAN LEGEND
1 C 28300 12-31-17
CHRIS DORMAN L I CENSED ARCH I TECT
STAT E OF CAL I FORN I A
A2.3
REVISIONS
SHEET
DATE: 7/6/17
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
WEST WING
ROOF PLAN
140 COMSTOCK CIRCLE
STANFORD, CA 94305
APN: 142-04-023
BUILDING/ QUAD NUMBER: 10-426 , STANFORD PROJECT NUMBER: 5207
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE STANFORD COMMUNITY
CHRIS DORMAN, AIA
234 SHORELINE HWY
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941
415.380.7914
415.380.7915 FAX
[email protected]
10/27/17 B.P.
RESUBMITTAL
5 A4.1
2 A4.1
5 A4.1
2 A4.1
2 A4.2
2 A4.2
6 A4.1
7 A4.1
6 A4.1
1 A3.2
2 A3.2
3 A3.2
6 A3.2
5 A3.2
2'-3"
O.H.
2'-3"
O.H.
11'-5 1/2"
DORMER
9'-11 1/2"
DORMER
1'-3"
11'-5 1/2"
DORMER
10'-1"
DORMER
1'-2 1/2"
11'-5 1/2"
DORMER
10'-1"
DORMER
9" 11'-5 1/2"
DORMER
11'-5 1/2"
DORMER
10'-3 1/2"
1'-3"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
2'-3"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
6"
O.H.
GUTTER, TYP.
EAVE
FLAT ROOF
AREA 1
FLAT ROOF
AREA 2
FLAT ROOF
AREA 3
6'-11 1/2"
OFFSET
4'-8"
OFFSET
3 A4.1
3 A4.1
M
M
M
10"
O.H.
10"
O.H. 10"
O.H.2'-6"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
AJ
2 4
1.1 AI
AG
AD
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14.1 15 16 17 18 19
AB
AA AA
AE
AC
AF
AH
BA
BB
BC
BD
BE
AD.1
AE.1
AI.1
5.1 7.1 7.2
8.1 10.1 10.2
11.1 AH
AF
BD
BE
1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
14 AA.1
AB.1
1 1.1
2 A4.1
5 A4.1
1 A4.1
3 A4.2
1 A4.2
4 A4.2
8 A4.1
8 A4.1
2 A4.1
5 A4.1
1 A4.1
2 A4.1
1 A4.1
7 A4.1
7 A4.1
9 A4.1
9 A7.1
4 A3.2
16 A7.1
16 A7.1
16 A7.1
10"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
10"O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
7'-1 1/2"
ROOF
OFFSET
2'-3"
O.H.
2'-3"
O.H.
2'-3"
O.H.
5'-9 1/2"
ROOF
OFFSET
4'-8 1/2"
OFFSET
5'-9"
ROOF
OFFSET
8'-3"
ROOF
OFFSET
1'-0"
EAVE
2'-6"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
1'-0"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
10" RAKE
1'-0"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
1'-0"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
2'-3"
O.H.
2'-3"
O.H.
1'-0"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
10"
RAKE
4'-3"'
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
4'-3"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
2'-3"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
4'-3"
O.H.
10"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
1'-3"
O.H.
2'-6"
O.H.
3"
O.H.
4'-3"
O.H.
5'-3"
OFFSET
24 A7.1
9 A7.1
9 A7.1
8 A7.1
8 A7.1
9 A7.1
8 A7.1
8 A7.1
14 A7.1
8 A7.1
8 A7.1
8 A7.1
14 A7.1
14 A7.1
14 A7.1
8 A7.1
24 A7.1
8 A7.1
24 A7.1
14 A7.1
9 A7.1
9 A7.1
8 A7.1
9 A7.1
CLERESTORY
WINDOW, TYP.
DORMER
FRAMING
BELOW
FRAMING
BELOW
CLERESTORY
WINDOW, TYP.
CLERESTORY
WINDOW, TYP.
FRAMING
BELOW
DORMER
FRAMING
BELOW
COLUMNS
BELOW
DORMER
FRAMING
BELOW
FRAMING
BELOW
FRAMING
BELOW
DORMER
FRAMING
BELOW
COLUMNS
BELOW
FRAMING
BELOW
FRAMING
BELOW
DORMER
FRAMING
BELOW
COLUMNS
BELOW
COLUMNS
BELOW
DORMER
FRAMING
BELOW
DORMER
FRAMING
BELOW
DORMER
FRAMING
BELOW
FRAMING
BELOW
FRAMING
BELOW
COLUMNS
BELOW
COLUMNS
BELOW
ROOF
CRICKET
ROOF
CRICKET
ROOF
CRICKET
GUTTER
GUTTER
GUTTER
GUTTER
GUTTER
GUTTER
GUTTER
TRELLIS
BELOW
TRELLIS
BELOW
TRELLIS
BELOW
(2) 10 1/2" X 10 1/2" BOX VENT IN
FRONT OF DORMER. DRILL (4)
2" DIA. HOLES @ RAFTERS IN
SHADED AREA
(2) 10 1/2" X 10 1/2" BOX VENT IN
FRONT OF DORMER. DRILL (4) 2"
DIA. HOLES @ RAFTERS IN
SHADED AREA
(2) 10 1/2" X 10 1/2"
BOX VENT IN
FRONT OF
DORMER. DRILL (4)
2" DIA. HOLES @
RAFTERS IN
SHADED AREA
(3) 10 1/2" X 10 1/2" BOX
VENT. DRILL (4) 2" DIA.
HOLES @ RAFTERS IN
SHADED AREA
(3) 10 1/2" X 10 1/2" BOX VENT.
DRILL (4) 2" DIA. HOLES @
RAFTERS IN SHADED AREA
(2) 10 1/2" X 10 1/2" BOX VENT.
DRILL (4) 2" DIA. HOLES @
RAFTERS IN SHADED AREA
2:12
1/2: 12
1:12
2:12
1:12
1:12
2:12
2:122:12
1/2: 12
1/2: 12
1:12
1:12 1/2: 12
1/2: 12
1/2: 12 1:
2 12
:12
1:12
2:122:12
1/2: 121/2: 12
1:12
1/2: 12 1:12
D.S.
WND. HD.
@ DORMER
EAVE
RAKE
RAKE
RAKE
EAVE
RAKE
RAKE
EAVE
EAVE
WND. HD.
@ DORMER
WND. HD.
@ DORMER
RAKE
RAKE
RAKE
EAVE EAVE
RAKE
RAKE
EAVE
EAVE
EAVE
EAVE
RAKE
EAVE
N
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
WEST WING ROOF PLAN
2 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 PROJECT
NORTH
SHEET NOTES
1. FOR ROOF PROFILE INFORMATION, FOLLOW SECTION
CUT REFERENCES TO SHEETS A4.1 & A4.2.
2. REFER TO ROOF NOTE, THIS SHEET, FOR ROOFING
SYSTEM INFORMATION.
ROOF NOTES
1. PROVIDE ROOF SYSTEM OVER ROOF SHEATHING TO INSURE TYPICALLY A MINIMUM 1/4" PER FOOT ROOF SLOPE TO DRAIN.
2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: COLD-APPLIED ASPHALTIC 3-PLY SBS ROOFING SYSTEM OVER NAILABLE WOOD DECK: GAF SYSTEM N-1-2-20 / MGPFR (CA) OR EQUAL. GAF.COM.
3. APPLICATOR QUALIFICATIONS: COMPANY SPECIALIZING IN BUILT-UP BITMUNIOUS ROOF APPLICATION APPROVED BY ROOFING MATERIALS MANUFACTURER.
4. MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATION: PRIOR TO START OF INSTALLATION OF THE WORK OF THIS SECTION, DURING PROGRESS OF THIS WORK,
AND AFTER FINAL TESTING OF THE WORK, AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MANUFACTURER OF THE WATERPROOFING MATERIAL SHALL INSPECT AND SHALL CERTIFY:
A. THAT THE SURFACE TO WHICH WATERPROOFING WAS APPLIED WAS IN A CONDITION SUITABLE FOR THE APPLICATION; B. THAT THE MATERIALS APPLIED CONFORMS TO THE SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS; C. THAT THE MATERIALS WERE APPLIED IN COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS.
5. WARRANTY: PROVIDE GAF BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION'S 20-YEAR GUARANTEE FOR MATERIALS AND ONE YEAR STANDARD WARRANTY. COVER DAMAGE TO WORK RESULTING FROM FAILURE TO RESIST PENETRATION OF MOISTURE.
6. BUILT-UP ROOF ON NAILABLE DECKS: GAF ROOF SYSTEM; N-1-2-20 / MGPFR ROOF SYSTEM, WITH THE APPROPRIATE GAF APPROVED BASE FLASHING AS SPECIFIED IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF GAF BUILT-UP ROOFING APPLICATION AND SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL.
A. NAILS: STANDARD ROUND WIRE SHINGLE TYPE OF HOT DIPPED ZINC COATED STEEL WITH 1 INCH METAL CAP OR NAILS WITH ATTACHED 1 INCH SQUARE OR ROUND METAL HEADS. NAILS SHALL BE
OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO PENETRATE THROUGH ROOF SHEATHING AND PROVIDE A WITHDRAWAL STRENGTH OF 40 PUNDS. STAPLES ARE NOT PERMITTED.
B. CANTS: FIBER CANT AND TAPERED EDGE STRIPS: ASPHALT IMPREGNATED WOOD FIBERBOARD, PERFORMED TO CONFIGURATION DETAILED.
7. FLASHING MATERIALS: PROVIDE FLASHING AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND CONFORM TO SYSTEM MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT DATA FOR FLASHINGS RECOMMENDED FOR THIS INSTALLATION. GSM FLASHINGS FURNISHED BY OTHERS.
8. WORKMANSHIP
A. INSTALL BUILT-UP ROOFING OVER SURFACES WHICH ARE CLEAN AND DRY, FREE OF WARPS AND VOIDS, AND PROPERLY SLOPED TO DRAINS.
B. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ROOF MOUNTED COMPONENTS, OR PROJECTING ITEMS. ENSURE ROOF PENETRATIONS ARE PROPERLY SIZED AND LOCATED PRIOR TO ROOFING.
C. DRAINAGE OUTLETS SHALL BE INSTALLED BELOW ROOF DECK SURFACE TO PERMIT FREE FLOW OF WATER AND TO PREVENT FORMING WATER DAMS AT RIMS.
D. VERIFY DECK IS SUPPORTED AND SECURELY NAILED.
E. PROCEED WITH THE WORK OF THIS SECTION ONLY AFTER CURBS, BLOCKING, NAILER STRIPS,
PIPING, CONDUIT AND OTHER PROJECTIONS THROUGH THE SUBSTRATE CONSTRUCTION ARE
COMPLETE, AFTER ALL FRAMING OF OPENINGS IS COMPLETE, AND WHEN EXISTING AND FORECASTED WEATHER CONDITIONS WILL
PERMIT THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, THE ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES, AND THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. BEGINNING INSTALLATION MEANS ACCEPTANCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SLOPES.
9. PREPARATIONS
A. PREPARE SURFACES, INCLUDING JOINTS AND CRACKS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS.
B. SHEET METAL WORK: ALL METAL FLASHINGS SHALL BE FACTORY PRIMED OR PRIMED WITH ASPHALT PRIMER AND ALLOWED TO DRY BEFORE ROOFING MATERIALS ARE APPLIED.
C. CANTS: NAIL CANTS 12 INCHES O.C. TO ROOF DECK. THE CANTS SHALL FIT FLUSH AT ENDS AND TO VERTICAL SURFACES. WHERE SCUPPERS OCCUR, APPLY CANT 2 INCHES BACK FROM FLANGE AND BEVEL CANT 8 INCHES FROM ENDS.
D. PROTECT BUILDING SURFACES AND INTERIOR AGAINST DAMAGE FROM ROOFING WORK.
10. APPLICATION
A. INSTALL ROOFING SYSTEM PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
WEST WING ROOF VENTILATION CALCULATION
TOTAL VENTILATION REQUIRED = 8,885 S.F. (ROOF AREA) / 300 = 29.62 S.F. OR 4265 SQ.IN. VENTILATION REQUIRED.
TYPICAL ROOF
TOTAL VENTILATION REQUIRED = 7,906 S.F. (ROOF AREA) / 300 = 26.35 S.F. OR 3,794 SQ.IN. VENTILATION REQUIRED.
VENTILATION PROVIDED:
(107) 3"X14" VENT @ EA. BAY OF LOW EAVE, TYP. = 4,494 SQ. IN. (60) 3"X14" VENT @ EA. BAY OF HIGH EAVE, TYP. = 2,520 SQ. IN. (48) 2"X14" VENT @ EA. BAY OF HIGH EAVE O/ CLERESTORY WINDOWS = 1344 SQ. IN. (21) 2"X14" VENT @ EA. BAY OF HIGH EAVE O/ VESTIBULE = 588 SQ. IN. (43) 2"X14" VENT @ EA. BAY OF DORMER HIGH EAVE, TYP. = 1,204 SQ. IN.
TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED: 10,150 SQ. IN.
FLAT ROOF AREA 1
TOTAL VENTILATION REQUIRED = 238 S.F. (ROOF AREA) / 300 = 0.79 S.F. OR 114 SQ.IN. VENTILATION REQUIRED.
VENTILATION PROVIDED:
(2) 3"X14" VENT @ EA. BAY OF LOW EAVE, TYP. = 84 SQ. IN. (2) 10 1/2"X 10 1/2" VENT (TRUE 38 ROOF VENT OR APPROVED EQ. @ 38 SQ. IN.) IN FRONT OF DORMERS = 76 SQ.IN.
TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED: 160 SQ. IN.
03/2/18 B.P.
RESUBMITTAL
FLAT ROOF AREA 2
TOTAL VENTILATION REQUIRED = 409 S.F. (ROOF AREA) / 300 = 1.36 S.F. OR 196 SQ.IN. VENTILATION REQUIRED.
VENTILATION PROVIDED:
(3) 3"X14" VENT @ EA. BAY OF LOW EAVE, TYP. = 126 SQ. IN. (3) 10 1/2"X 10 1/2" VENT (TRUE 38 ROOF VENT OR APPROVED EQ. @ 38 SQ. IN.) IN FRONT OF DORMERS = 114 SQ.IN.
TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED: 240 SQ. IN.
FLAT ROOF AREA 3
TOTAL VENTILATION REQUIRED = 332 S.F. (ROOF AREA) / 300 = 1.11 S.F. OR 160 SQ.IN. VENTILATION REQUIRED.
VENTILATION PROVIDED:
(3) 3"X14" VENT @ EA. BAY OF LOW EAVE, TYP. = 126 SQ. IN. (3) 10 1/2"X 10 1/2" VENT (TRUE 38 ROOF VENT OR APPROVED EQ. @ 38 SQ. IN.) IN FRONT OF DORMERS = 114 SQ.IN.
TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED: 240 SQ. IN.
DESIGN PROCESS & STRATEGY
CLASSROOM FURNITURE LAYOUT
Dorman Associates shall work with the Client on the furniture and equipment requirements, and determine which products, layouts, and components meet the needs of the program.
Furniture plan will be consistent with overall design goals, and will be included in the final program.
STANFORD REDWOOD CITY - BUILDING A1 - CHILDCARE CENTER
6/7/18
2 Y/O CLASSROOM
DW
DW
RE
G268
G28
G268
G28
A263
A263
F675
J432
J432
J432
J708
J708
J708
J708
J708 J708
J708
J708
J708
J708
J708
J708
A811
A811
F643
F643
H500
F775
C908 1 C90 C906 C902 C903 F675
F643
S2
A283
B405
A631
A283
H560
A283 A283
A744 A742 A742 A744
A263
A263
F675
J432
J432
4J 32
08 7J
J708
J708
08 7J
J708 J708
J708
J708 J708
J708
J708
J708
A811
A811
F643
F643
H500
F775
C908
C906 1 C90
C902 C903
F675
F643
S2
A283
B405
A631
A283
H560
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
M162
H832
H831
H832
H831
REF
WALL HUNG
CABINET A283.
MOUNT TOP @
7'-2" A.F.F.
WALL HUNG
G28 DIAPER
CHANGING
SHELF ABOVE.
MOUNT TOP @
7'-2" A.F.F.
WALL HUNG
G28 DIAPER
CHANGING
SHELF ABOVE.
MOUNT TOP @
7'-2" A.F.F.
WALL HUNG
CABINET A283.
MOUNT TOP @
7'-2" A.F.F.
SHEET NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE BLOCKING IN WALLS WHERE REQUIRED FOR
INSTALLATION AND PROPER SUPPORT OF PLUMBING FIXTURES, ACCESSORIES, CABINETRY, LIGHTING FIXTURES, AND WALL-MOUNTED FURNITURE BY OWNER AND PER FURNITURE PLAN.
STANFORD REDWOOD CITY - BUILDING A1 - CHILDCARE CENTER
6/7/18
PRESCHOOL CLASSROOM #1
DW
REF
A263
A263
A273
F675
A263
A273
F675
A260
A801
A801
A801
J712 J712
J712
J712 J712 J712
J712 J712 J712
J712 J712 J712
J712 J712 J712
J712 J712
712 J
F775
J712
A631
H520
H558
F952
C700
H560
F642
F642 F642
F642
F675 F675 F642
F642
A283 A283
A283 A283
C234 J712
LIGHT LABORATORY
M162M162M162M162M162M162M162M162M162M162
H831
H833
PANTRY W/
BUILT-IN
MICRO
WALL HUNG
CABINET A283.
MOUNT TOP @
7'-2" A.F.F.
WALL HUNG
CABINET A283.
MOUNT TOP @
7'-2" A.F.F.
4'-0" KIDS
COUCH. TO BE
SELECTED
SHEET NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE BLOCKING IN WALLS WHERE REQUIRED FOR
INSTALLATION AND PROPER SUPPORT OF PLUMBING FIXTURES, ACCESSORIES, CABINETRY, LIGHTING FIXTURES, AND WALL-MOUNTED FURNITURE BY OWNER AND PER FURNITURE PLAN.
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
The duration of the Construction Administration phase shall be from the start of construction to the completion of the punch list work. Dorman Associates will coordinate with the Client and General Contractor to interpret and clarify the intent of the Construction Documents, and will visit the site as needed to assist the Client and ensure that the work is progressing in an acceptable manner.
Duties Shall Include:
• Arrange a pre-construction conference with client,
consultants, and the contractor to mutually agree upon the administration process and further review critical areas of interface and the impact of long-lead products.
• Coordinate with Commissioning team.
• Provide interpretation and clarification to contract documents and respond to contractor requests for information as
necessary.
• Prepare sketches during construction to accommodate
unforeseen construction circumstances.
• Review and approve required shop drawings, samples, and product information as required to facilitate completion of the project. Respond to all RFI’s in an agreed-upon timeframe.
Review and approve / reject change orders submitted by the contractor.
• Visit and tour job site as required by the client, and attend construction meetings at the job site as needed.
• Prepare and issue to the general contractor and furniture dealer and appropriate “punch-list” of items to be corrected before final payment by the client.
DESIGN PROCESS & STRATEGY