South San Francisco City Council
October 11, 2023

Proposal | August 9, 2023
800 Hearst Avenue | Berkeley, CA 94710
(510) 845-7549 | www.migcom.com
In association with:

BKF Engineers | mack5 | Geocon Consultants
Interface Engineering | Daedalus Structural Engineering

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
Linden Avenue Park
Landscape Architecture, Design, and
Community Facilitation Services

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1, Cover Letter 1

2. Consultant Qualifications & Experience 2

3. Understanding of the Project 11

4. Work Plan 13

5. Proposed Staffing 19

6. Conflict of interest Statement 28

7. Litigation 28

8. Cost Proposal/Task Hours 30
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 1
800 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
(510) 845-7549
www.migcom.com

CALIFORNIA

BERKELEY, FULLERTON,

LOS ANGELES, PASADENA,

RIVERSIDE, SACRAMENTO,

SAN DIEGO, SAN JOSE,

AND SONOMA

COLORADO
DENVER

NEW YORK

BROOKLYN
OREGON

PORTLAND
TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO

WASHINGTON

SEATTLE
August 9, 2023
City of South San Francisco
Philip Vitale
Deputy Director Capital Projects
400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
RE: RFP - pk 2305 Linden Avenue Park
Dear Philip,
MIG, Inc., is pleased to submit this response to the RFP for landscape architecture, design, and community facilitation services for the Linden Avenue Park Project in the City of San Francisco. We are a multidisciplinary corporation with over 40 years of experience collaborating with communities to realize projects just like Linden Avenue Park, by providing our planning, design, and community engagement expertise. Our distinctive approach is supported by the principles of environmental psychology and our passion and skill at supporting and helping communities in sharing their distinct stories. MIG has worked with thousands of communities on parks, children’s environments, and urban plazas that support human development and connect both people to people and people to place. We create community-inspired places that are inclusive, accessible, and flexible, and that are an embodiment of the spirit of a place and culture.

We appreciate the importance of this park as a recreational and social amenity that welcomes the diverse South San Francisco community. We look forward to collaborating with the City and the community through inclusive engagement and refining the current vision of a park that includes the following components expressed in the RFP: Children's Play Areas (2–5 and 5–12-year-olds); a space for recreation; a sports court; spaces for community gathering; an overhead structure or entrance node; public art; and a series of landscape elements that connect these all together. With the current vision in mind, our overall approach will consist of:
• Creating a dynamic park that takes advantage of this signature opportunity. • Integrating public art to help tell the story of the community while sharing its diverse culture.
• Weaving together a public space that is equitable and inclusive to all people.

We welcome the opportunity to share how our skills and expertise are distinctly suited for Linden Avenue Park. The following proposal summarizes the breadth of our services and technical expertise, our passion for making a community’s vision a reality, and the character of our built work. We have received and read all the addenda issued as part of this RFP.

Please do not hesitate to reach out if we can help in any way: [email protected]; 510-812-1455 (cell).

With Respect,
José de Jesús Leal, PLA, ASLA
Principal-In-Charge

1. Cover Letter
2 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park
MIG’s designs focus on sustainability, following a
regenerative design approach to creating healthy
landscapes. We understand that a healthy landscape
takes less to maintain and sustain. We implement
strategies that nurture the soil, allowing the biology in the soil to function properly, which in turn sequesters carbon and reduces carbon emissions, minimizes
landfill waste and water use, and increases biodiversity and habitat, as well as maximizes the overall health
of the landscape. A healthy landscape is flexible and
responsive to changing community needs. MIG’s
designs ensure that every piece of developed area
has more than one use and is able to transform its role based on the time of the day or day of the week. Be
it parking lanes in streets used for outdoor dining or
parking lots used as farmers markets, MIG programs
all open spaces for multiple uses. A healthy landscape
also uses resources wisely. MIG integrates best water
conservation and water reuse practices that include
drought-tolerant planting palettes, use of grey water,
and similar tactics. Water conservation begins with the design by limiting the amount of water required while
providing high-distribution uniformity. Tools include
ET-based controllers, moisture sensing, point source
irrigation, and irrigation audits.

More than anything, MIG’s designs welcome everyone.

Our team’s universal design approach goes beyond
standard ADA requirements to create environments that
are usable by everyone, regardless of age, race, gender, ability, or background. We design to ensure access and
connection, so that the benefits and experiences people have on one site can lead them to want to connect to
nearby sites, creating opportunity for economic synergy.

MIG’s parks are places where everyone feels welcome
and at home—they feel a boost in neighborhood pride,
ownership, stewardship, and caring not only for the
park, but also for each other.

About MIG
MIG, Inc., is a community of designers, planners,
engineers, scientists, and storytellers who engage
people in creative problem-solving and collective
action. We believe that the physical and social
environment around us have a profound impact on our
lives, and this belief shapes the principles that guide our work:
• Communities can plan their own futures
• The world needs an ecological perspective
• Great projects work for everyone
• Elegant design inspires new thinking
• Every project presents an opportunity to advance
racial and social equity
• All work must be context driven
For nearly four decades, MIG has created places
where people of all ages can exercise their minds and
bodies through play. At all stages of our lives, play is an essential part of being human. It shapes our brains, opens us to new possibilities, makes us adaptable
to new ideas, and creates avenues for strong social
connections. It is central to our health, well-being,
creativity, and intelligence. We all need to play, and we all need to feel a sense of connection to our community as well as our natural surroundings.

Our designs grow from public engagement. MIG is
well-known for creative outreach. Our approach is
cross-generational and universal—allowing all ages
and abilities to share in the experience. Our work is
characterized by a dedication to quality, a flexible and collaborative approach, creativity in planning and
design, and a commitment to completing projects on
time and within budget. We believe that successful
projects happen when the consultant team becomes
an extension of the client team, and our well-honed
and established project management, communication,
scheduling, and cost control processes are designed
and activated in service of this project with that in mind.

2. Consultant Qualifications & Experience
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 3
Our Subconsultants

BKF ENGINEERS
Since 1915, BKF Engineers (BKF) has earned a
reputation for their ability to successfully plan, design, survey, and implement complex projects. BKF draws
on years of experience to guide projects from initial
due dilegence and feasibility through design and
construction. Their proven approach recognizes that
developing dynamic projects takes focused team
collaboration, mitigating physical constraints and
potential risks, and balancing design goals with value
engineering solutions. Through its network of 16 West
Coast offices, BKF provides civil engineering, land
surveying, and land planning services for government
agencies, institutions, developers, design professionals, contractors, and school districts. BKF’s decades of
engineering, surveying, and planning experience is
evident in its legacy projects throughout the West
Coast. By leveraging its diverse project portfolio in
combination with innovative design solutions, BKF’s
team of more than 500 experienced staff is dedicated
to successfully delivering sustainable and dynamic
projects for our communities.

MACK5
For over 22 years, mack5 has provided planning and
management for complex construction projects. They
specialize in public and nonprofit works, and customize their services for each project’s needs. Their purpose
is to deliver not only the greatest value for their clients, but also to get the best value out of every dollar they spend—be it on planning, designing, or building. Their
team includes seasoned construction professionals
with diverse backgrounds: cost estimators, architects,
engineers, and contractors. Their staff brings unique
perspectives and broad knowledge to planning for,
managing, and controlling costs, schedules, and quality at all stages of a project’s life.

GEOCON CONSULTANTS
Geocon is a one of the largest California-only
geo-environmental firms that delivers geotechnical
engineering, materials testing, special inspections,
environmental consulting, and hazardous materials
services to public agencies and private entities
throughout the State of California. Geocon is equipped
with an experienced team of professionals and fully
accredited laboratory testing facilities located across nine California offices, offering comprehensive field,
laboratory, and engineering analyses for a wide range of projects using in-house resources. All of their projects are managed with the ultimate goal of producing
technically sound, economically feasible solutions for
their clients.

INTERFACE ENGINEERING
Interface Engineering is a multidisciplined mechanical
and electrical engineering firm known for innovative
resource use, visionary sustainable design, and
breakthrough engineering solutions for new and
existing buildings. Our work demonstrates how
integrated design and creative collaboration can
produce outstanding results—for our clients, our
community, and our environment.

DAEDALUS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Daedalus is a Bay Area structural engineering firm
with over 38 years of experience designing new and
renovating older building resources. They provide a full range of structural engineering services, and their staff has diverse experience in project types, complexity, and size, including seismic evaluation and retrofit design, custom residential, civic, k-12 and higher education,
and commercial projects, as well as building and earth
retention shoring.

Relevant Experience
MIG's work draws on our national and international
experience, working at a variety of scales in a multitude of settings. As presented on the following pages, the
MIG Team has expertise and experience in providing
solutions for a variety of civic and community parks,
sports fields and other athletic facilities, playgrounds and children's play environments, trails, and other public recreational facilities.
4 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park

PROJECT DETAILS
MIG Role: Prime
Contracting Agency: City of
Cupertino
Agency Contact: Evelyn Moran
Public Works Project Manager
408-777-1313
[email protected]
Contract Dates: 2022 – Ongoing
Contract Amount:
$401,511
MIG Project Manager: Jan Eiesland
MIG worked with the City of Cupertino in preparing their first-ever Citywide Parks and Recreation Master Plan. As part of that effort, residents clearly articulated their desire for truly all-inclusive recreation and the City identified Jollyman Park, one of the City’s largest parks, as the location for an all-inclusive playground. The City was successful in winning a grant to help fund the improvements.

MIG worked with the City, public, and stakeholders within the differing abilities community, Art Commission, and Park and Recreation Commission to replace the existing 5–12-year-old play area with a larger, universallyaccessible, all-inclusive destination play area where people of all ages and abilities can play together. The new play area supports recreation and social interaction for people with autism; sensory challenges; cognitive, developmental, and physical disability; and those without special needs.

The improvements include a restroom, sidewalk enhancements, a fenced perimeter, picnic areas, and a collection of nature-themed play areas that each offer a variety of ways to participate and experience play.

MIG is currently working with the City and Art Commission to include additional play value through some custom fabrications such as a shade kaleidoscope and bird scavenger hunt. The project is expected to go out to bid in late 2023 and open in 2024.

Jollyman Park All-Inclusive Playground
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 5

PROJECT DETAILS
MIG Role: Prime
Contracting Agency:

City of San José
Agency Contact: Haydé Pacheco
Parks Manager–Capital Projects
Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood
Services
408-793-4197
[email protected]
Contract Dates: 2020 – Ongoing
Contract Amount: $405,000
MIG Project Manager: Jan Eiesland
Emma Prusch Farm Park was gifted to the City of San José with the vision of creating and maintaining a rural country atmosphere in the city that promotes and demonstrates historic, contemporary, and culturally relevant agricultural practices. This neighborhood park is unique in the region with a working farm that is co-managed with nonprofits and docents. The park includes community gardens, rare fruit orchards, livestock, a barn, historic buildings, picnic facilities, and a play area (park visitors also get to enjoy the free-ranging peacocks and chickens that make visits extra memorable!). MIG is working with the City of San José to expand the play area by designing an all-inclusive playground that builds on the agricultural history of the site while providing improved play experiences for all ages and abilities.

The concept builds on the park’s unique character of being a working farm and plays with scale in a fun way—for example, there is a giant chicken climbing structure. The hillside has a looping accessible path with a variety of sliding options and shared, shaded seating areas help bridge the existing play area with the new area. The park is expected to open in 2023.

Emma Prusch All-Inclusive Playground
6 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park

PROJECT DETAILS
MIG Role: Subconsultant
Contracting Agency:

City of Newark (Perkins+Will)
Agency Contact: Roya Gonzalez,
Administrative Analyst
City of Newark
510-578-4284
[email protected]
Contract Dates: 2019 – 2021
Contract Amount: $233,000
MIG Project Manager: Amy Mitchell
Deupty Project Manager:

Jan Eiesland
As part of a design/build team with Webcor and Perkins+Will, MIG worked with the City of Newark to create a sustainable landscape for their new, modern civic campus anchoring Civic Center Park. Rooted in the City’s mission to be both good stewards of natural resources and build and support community connectedness, MIG’s concept included a variety of spaces specially designed to reflect the local natural context and provide areas for community celebration and gathering. At the same time, the new landscape ties together and supports the daily activities and programs of the new Public Library, City Hall, and Police Headquarters. Particular care was taken to embed a sense of the Bay as well as the community’s lively character into the design of the paving and features.

Spaces were designed to be flexible and work for small groups as well as large ones. A broad, arcing terraced bench creates an inviting focal point that is also a great perch for a range of activities from library story hours, eating lunch, or watching a community performance. Planting was selected to emphasize native plants and reflect the natural coastal environment.

Newark Civic Center
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 7

PROJECT DETAILS
MIG Role: Subconsultant
Contracting Agency:

City of Los Altos
Agency Contact:

Janet Tam, Principal
Noll & Tam
510-649-8295
[email protected]
Contract Dates: 2018 – 2021
Contract Amount: $246,980
MIG Project Manager: Jan
Eiesland
MIG partnered with the City of Los Altos and Noll & Tam to design a new multigenerational community center that offers highly flexible spaces designed with durable materials to serve the community for many years to come. The design integrates surrounding public facilities and focuses on traditional forms and contemporary and natural wood finishes to evoke the California landscape.

The landscape defines outdoor rooms that complement and extend the internal spaces while incorporating green infrastructure and water-efficient practices.

Other elements include improved site circulation and connections to adjacent civic facilities, a new childcare facility with outdoor play and learning space, teen hangout/ lounge space, and public gathering areas that create welcoming and restful entries to the building.

Los Altos Community Center
8 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park

PROJECT DETAILS
MIG Role: Prime
Contracting Agency: Hemisfair
Park Area Redevelopment
Corporation
Agency Contact:

Andres Andujar, CEO
Hemisfair Park Area
Redevelopment Corporation
210-867-1305
[email protected]
Contract Dates: 2012 – 2020
Contract Amount: $1.2M
MIG Project Manager: José de
Jesús Leal
Awards:
• 2019 Texas ASLA Honor Award
• 2019 Landscape Architecture
Foundation Case Study
• Honorable mention for the 24th
EDRA GPA Place-Design Award
As one of the first projects completed in the 100-acre redevelopment of Hemisfair Park, Yanaguana Garden is a catalyst for economic development and community interaction. Working closely with the City of San Antonio and the Hemisfair Park Area Redevelopment Corporation (HPARC), MIG led the visioning, programming, and design process that included thousands of area residents and business owners.

The result is a 24/7 outdoor play and recreation experience that fosters creativity, exploration, learning, and fitness by encouraging everyone to play—regardless of age or ability.

A large blue net structure called the Boomerang invites children of all ages—even Dad—to climb, and ping pong and foosball tables offer opportunities for family competition. Sculptures commissioned by the City from local artists serve as illuminated steel “pup-tents” to create a camp circle and airy play structures become “houses” for imaginative hosts. A promenade with a vine-covered pergola winds through the site like its namesake river. A cascading water spray area and an inland beach lure people to beat the heat. Large green spaces and walking/jogging paths offer rest or movement.

MIG also collaborated with Native tribes and artists to infuse landscape elements with the community’s history and culture. Sinuous, mosaic-covered seating and a climbable spotted blue panther sparkle like jewels and reflect the native origin story. A custom restroom building features a curving psychedelic mural, and colorful checkered “flooring” in the central square can be a game board or a dance floor for special events.

As the new world standard for innovative play for all, Yanaguana is a refreshing start to the renewal of San Antonio’s Hemisfair Park.

Yanaguana Garden at Hemisfair Park
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 9
MIG Role: Prime
Contracting Agency: MRCA
Agency Contact: Liz Jennings,
Project Manager, MRCA
(323) 221-9944
[email protected]
Contract Dates: 2014 – 2017
Contract Amount: $121,000
MIG Project Manager: Oscar
Johnson
Sustainable Design Lead: José
de Jesús Leal
Compton Creek Natural Park is the result of a collaborative effort between the Mountain Recreation Conservation Authority (MRCA) and Compton Unified School District (CUSD) to develop the five-acre property behind Washington Elementary School adjacent to Compton Creek. The goal was to develop a natural park integrated with an outdoor learning environment to serve both the school and the surrounding community of Compton, California. Providing both schematic design and construction documents, MIG worked with the MRCA and CUSD to develop the educational concepts behind the site design, conducting multiple work sessions with Washington Elementary School teachers.

The park is designed to create a multi-sensory experience that layers history, natural science, and art into each area, and creates a safe place for student exploration adjacent to spacious green community areas for recreation, relaxation, and socializing. The plan was constructed in two phases: phase 1 includes a multi-use trail along Compton Creek with interpretive signs, a community plaza, and picnic area, as well as a small amphitheater, exercise stations, and a multi-use lawn; phase 2 comprises the outdoor learning area, including features such as a native stone climbing wall, play stream, local Native American history-themed sand play, and an historic California-themed children’s garden. The site design emphasizes restoring the natural stormwater system using surface bioswales and pervious paving.

Compton Creek Natural Park
10 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park
˜ ˜
˜
˜
Yanaguana Garden at Hemisfair Park, San Antonio, TX ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Compton Creek Natural Park at Washington Elementary, Compton, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Craig Ranch Regional Park Master Plan and Phase 1, North Las Vegas, NV ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Earvin “Magic” Johnson Park, Willowbrook, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Pasadena Playhouse Park, Pasadena, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜
53rd Avenue West Park and All-Inclusive Play Area, Hillsboro, OR ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Hing Hay Park, Seattle, WA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜
Beacon Mountain at Jefferson Park, Seattle, WA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Bicentennial Park Play Area, Southlake, TX ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Kid’s Place at Grand Park Play Area Concept Design, Frisco, TX ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ The Children’s Zoo at Oklahoma City Zoological Park, Oklahoma City, OK ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Park and Community Play Area
Design Experience
MIG has a proven track record of managing complex, multiobjective park projects that create a high degree of community support through creative design, dynamic visuals, and powerful metaphors.

The matrix below and the following additional examples show more of the broad range of our experience and capabilities.

Park Planning and DesignPlay Space Planning and DesignInnovative Design TrendsWater Play or Aquatic Feature DesignSustainability and Resilience MeasuresAll-Inclusive EnvironmentsGarnering Community InputWorking with Diverse PopulationsCity Approval ProcessesCost EstimationProject Management and ToolsPrime Consultant Contract Emma Prusch All-Inclusive Playground, San José, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Elm Park Renovation, Richmond, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜
Verdese Carter Park, Oakland, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜
Hal Brown Park at Creekside, Kentfield, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Koret Play Area at Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ San José Children’s Discovery Museum, San José, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Always Dream Park Play Area, Fremont, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Happy Hollow Park and Zoo Master Plan, San José, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Jollyman All-Inclusive Playground, Cupertino, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Almaden Lake Park All-Inclusive Play Area, San José, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ Richmond Playground Renovation, San Francisco, CA ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 11

3. Understanding of the Project
A challenge we see with a park site less than one acre
in size is balancing development to fulfill as much
of the community needs as possible without overprogramming or cramming too much into one space.

Possible solutions for this include creating spaces that are flexible and offer opportunities for both organized and non-organized uses; providing compact play and
recreational solutions with high-value opportunities and limited footprints; carefully designing every inch of the park to make sure park uses are compatible with each
other and with adjacent parcels; and assuring that every space serves a need for either play or socializing.

A Signature Opportunity: With the potential to close off Pine Avenue and merge two parcels in a prime location,
Linden Avenue Park has the potential to emerge as a
signature location for the City of South San Francisco.

In our site visit, we noticed the parcel with the parking lot had a steady flow of cars coming and going. One
challenge is helping local business owners understand
how the new park and parking configuration will
ultimately be a benefit for their businesses. While the new park design cannot respond to every need facing
the neighborhood, the engagement and design process
can become a model for how the City approaches
community needs as they potentially relate to those of
economic development. A potential compromise to the
loss of public parking may be creating flexible areas
for businesses and business patrons to be able to spill over onto the park. Creating spaces for people to sit and eat pan dulce from Las Hijas Del Gallo, or tacos, jugos, curry, or pizza from restaurants down the street could
seize the opportunity to integrate and promote more
innovative park revitalization strategies that specifically link economic development and livability with improved
health and wellness outcomes, all while showcasing
South San Francisco’s cultural diversity through foods.

Located in South San Francisco, Linden Avenue
Park presents a tremendous opportunity to create a
community gathering and recreational space for the
downtown neighborhood. The approximate future park
site is composed of two parcels located at the eastern
corners of the intersection of Linden Avenue and Pine
Avenue. One parcel is currently a vacant grass lot, while the second is an active public parking lot. The combined total of the two parcels is nearly three quarters of
an acre. The current City vision is for a park with
children's play areas (2–5 and 5–12-year-olds), a space for recreation, a sports court, spaces for community
gatherings, an overhead structure or entrance node,
public art, and a series of landscape elements that help connect them all together. Additionally, the current
vision proposes the closure of a section of Pine Avenue and construction of a vehicular roundabout within the
park site.

We understand that through inclusive engagement the
current vision will be refined and evolved to assure that the final design reflects the values of the community
and provides the amenities that will both enhance and
support the recreational, social, and economic needs of the community. As requested, the following discusses
some of the anticipated challenges and possible
solutions to those challenges, based on our preliminary observations and current understanding.

Challenges and Solutions
Creating a Dynamic Park: Currently both parcels offer
little to nothing in terms of recreational and community gathering opportunities. And even though one of the
parcels currently sits as a grass lot with a meandering pathway, it lacks the facilities and programming
required to truly act as a valuable open space amenity.

Successful parks work for people alone or in groups;
they work for traditional sports and play, but they also welcome nontraditional activities. Great parks have
spaces that can morph and change and evolve with
the community to create new traditions and respond to
modern trends. They work weekdays, weekends, and
for special events. They can adjust to changing human
needs, and they offer multiple behavior opportunities—
socializing, exercising, celebrating, being quiet, or just having a good laugh.
12 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park
Integration of Local Arts: The closure of Pine Avenue
will have a slight impact on vehicular and pedestrian
circulation within the neighborhood. It will require
looking at potential off-site improvements to the
intersection of Pine Avenue and Linden Avenue as well
as how the park interacts with the edges at 7th and 8th Lane, which will serve as bookends to the park site. Art can integrate the park site with the street and vehicular edges and provide visual cues to assist in wayfinding.

Artist-produced elements can help with place-keeping
and emphasizing the character and values of the
neighborhood; connect the park to the community,
and help celebrate the diverse cultures of not just the neighborhood, but that of South San Francisco. Art can
also provide one-of-a-kind elements that deepen and
enrich the park; can be both aesthetic and functional,
and serve as gateways and entry markers, traffic
calming and park edge markers, seating, and play and
exploration.

Equitable and Inclusive: Because of the size of the
park and its location surrounded by residential and
commercial uses, the park has the greatest potential
to serve as a community plaza and meeting place.

The challenge will be creating a place that respects
the different abilities, backgrounds, and cultures to
encourage everyone to feel welcomed. By designing
a place where children come to play; parents come
to watch, meet, and play; teens, adults, seniors, and
groups meet up, play, and socialize with their neighbors; and others merely come to sit, eat, and find inspiration in the sounds of people interacting, we can assure we
confront the challenges presented by this project and
the site. To set the foundation, the engagement process must be open to invite and include all those who wish
to be included and involved. When design reflects
the diverse ideas, interests, and needs of the local
community, it has the power to strengthen community
pride, ownership, and stewardship of the community,
and help celebrate people of all ages, cultural heritage, and abilities.

City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 13

4. Work Plan
Task 1.3.2 Existing Site Conditions Confirmation
BKF will review the existing site remediation,
topographic, and utility survey information to confirm
there are no gaps in the information necessary for
project construction documentation. If needed, BKF
can provide a full topographic survey and utilities
documentation as an additional service.

Task 1.3.3 Geotechnical Report
Geocon will conduct geotechnical sampling, taking two
exploratory borings within the project site to ascertain subsurface soil conditions. They will interpret borings and provide a geotechnical report to address the design of park pavement and footings.

Task 1.4 Base File Set-up and Opportunities/
Constraints Analysis
MIG will develop a scaled base map for developing the
park design. This base map will be used to assemble
relevant information on the proposed park site,
including circulation, existing features, trees, and other information as appropriate. MIG will prepare a graphic
summarizing existing assets, issues, and opportunities, including circulation and accessibility, landscape
features, and overall character, paying special attention to human developmental needs and environmental
health and sustainability.

Task 1.5 Community Engagement Part 1:

Prepare to Engage
Task 1.5.1 Confirm Engagement Strategy
MIG will confirm the community engagement methods
described in the RFP, as well as the City’s goals and
preferred engagement techniques, both analog
and digital. We will work with the City to identify
stakeholders (City staff, City leaders, and community
groups) whose insights and support will help build a
successful park. Per the RFP, this proposal assumes:
• printed and online survey (hosted by MIG),
• two to three Pop-up Events, and
• two in-person Community Meetings.

MIG has prepared the following Work Plan based on our
understanding of the tasks described in the PK2305
Linden Avenue Park RFP, dated July 12, 2023. We look
forward to confirming/refining this scope in collaboration with the City’s project team.

PHASE 1: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
Task 1.1: Project Kick-off Meeting & Site Tour
MIG and their consultant team (“the MIG Team”) will
meet with the City of South San Francisco project
team (”the City”) to discuss the project background,
reference materials, and pre-design investigations and
studies; review opportunities and challenges; establish project goals and communication protocols; and review
project tasks and schedule, etc. This meeting will launch a strong collaborative team, committed to a shared
process and vision to create an innovative and dynamic
Linden Avenue Park with a focus on meeting the City’s
goals for the budget and schedule. This kick-off meeting will also include a community engagement strategy
discussion, as well as a site tour to observe and discuss the existing site conditions as a team.

Task 1.2 Bi-Weekly Project Meetings
The MIG project manager will maintain close contact
with the City’s project team through regular virtual
check-ins (typically 1 hour) every other week.

Task 1.3 Pre-Design Analysis and Investigations
Prior to design, the MIG Team will investigate and review existing conditions and background information as
described below.

Task 1.3.1 Review of Existing Conditions and
Background Documents
The MIG Team will review codes, standards, and
environmental regulations applicable to the potential
park improvements. We will review City-provided
documents and online research regarding the site’s
natural, social, and cultural history, including land
use and demographics, as well as operations and
maintenance concerns.
14 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park
Task 1.8 Preferred Concept Presentations
The MIG Team will prepare and present the preferred
concept alternative at a total of six in-person meetings:
• Core community stakeholder groups (up to 3 separate
meetings),
• City Council,
• Parks and Recreation Commission, and
• Cultural Arts Commission.

Task 1.9 Ongoing Project Management and Team
Coordination
MIG will coordinate the work of the design team,
monitoring the project schedule and budget, as well as
project quality, and preparing and submitting monthly
invoices.

Conceptual Design Phase Deliverables:
• Final Work Plan and Project Schedule (in coordination with City)
• Topographic survey and existing utilities
documentation
• Geotechnical report
• Concept Alternatives/Engagement Exhibits
• Illustrative plans or sketches and precedent imagery
• Printed and online survey
• Community Engagement Summary
• Preferred Concept Alternative
• Preferred Concept Estimate of Probable Costs
• Preferred Concept Alternative Presentation Material
• Meeting Notes and Action Summaries for MIG-led
meetings
PHASE 2: SCHEMATIC DESIGN (SD)
Task 2.1 Bi-Weekly Project Meetings
The MIG project manager will continue close contact
with the City’s project team through regular virtual
check-ins (typically 1 hour) every other week. At the
initial SD meeting, MIG will review and confirm the
project schedule with the City.

Should this task identify different efforts than these, the scope and fee will be revised to reflect the modified
level of effort.

Task 1.5.2 Prepare Materials
The MIG Team will prepare two Design Alternatives that
depict initial ideas for the park. Design alternatives will be presented through illustrative plans and precedent
imagery sketches that explain the general form, content, and experiential quality of the design. Rough order-ofmagnitude costs will be developed for each alternative.

Materials will be developed to share the concepts with
the community, as well as to provide an understanding
of underlying character and cultural influences that
can be expressed in the design. The materials will be
formatted to support the planned engagement activities
and will be prepared in both English and Spanish.
(Translation services to be provided by the City.)
Task 1.6 Community Engagement, Part 2:

Listen, Learn, and Vision
Task 1.6.1 Engage
MIG will engage the community according to the plan
confirmed in Task 1.5.1.

Task 1.6.2 Community Engagement Summary
MIG will summarize the community’s feedback in a
concise document, including visual exhibits where
applicable.

Task 1.6.3 Engagement Summary City Review
Meeting
MIG will host an extended (2-hour) bi-weekly meeting
with the City project team to review the community
engagement summary and get final direction before
developing the Preferred Concept Alternative.

Task 1.7 Preferred Concept Development
Based on community feedback and the City’s
consolidated comments and direction, MIG will prepare
a preferred concept with exhibits for presentation to
key City commissions and stakeholders. The exhibits
will include an illustrative plan with supporting graphics (precedent imagery, sections, elevations or other
sketches) that provide a sense of the park activities,
experience, and vision.

City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 15
Task 2.6 Ongoing Project Management and Team
Coordination
MIG will continue to coordinate the work of the design
team, monitoring the project schedule and budget, as
well as project quality, and preparing and submitting
monthly invoices.

Schematic Design Deliverables:
• Schematic Basis of Design Document
• 100% Schematic Design drawings, with illustrative
plan and supporting exhibits
• Outline technical specifications in CSI format
• Schematic Estimate of Probable Costs
• Schematic Design Presentation
• Meeting Notes and Action Summaries for MIG-led
meetings
• Updated project schedule
PHASE 3: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (DD)
Task 3.1 Bi-Weekly Project Meetings
The MIG project manager will continue close contact
with the City’s project team through regular virtual
check-ins (typically 1 hour) every other week. At the
initial DD meeting, MIG will review and confirm the
project schedule with the City.

Task 3.2 Final Basis of Design (BOD) Document
Based on consolidated SD comments and direction
provided by City staff, the MIG Team will prepare a Final BOD document.

Task 3.3 Design Development Package
Based on consolidated SD comments and direction
provided by City staff, the MIG Team will develop the DD package, including the following elements:
• Design Development-level drawings (including all
disciplines to be incorporated in the construction
documents)
• Design Development Materials Board, samples, and
equipment cut sheets
• Design Development Technical Specifications in CSI
format
• DD Estimate of Probable Costs
Task 2.2 Prepare Basis of Design (BOD) Document
Based on the approved Concept Design and
coordination with City staff and Operations, the MIG
Team will provide a concise BOD document with a
narrative description of the systems and products to
be used at Linden Avenue Park, as well as applicable
standards, design guidelines, and code requirements.

Task 2.3 Develop SD Package
Building on the BOD, the MIG Team will develop a draft
Schematic Design package, including the following
elements:
• Schematic-level design drawings (existing conditions, demolition, and schematic utilities; site plan;
schematic sections or elevations where needed to
communicate design intent)
• Outline Technical Specifications in CSI format
• SD Estimate of Probable Costs
Task 2.4 Design and Cost Estimate Review Meeting
MIG and mack5 will participate in an extended bi-weekly meeting (2 hours) to review the Schematic package and
cost estimate with the City project team to confirm the design and discuss VE options, if needed, to bring the
design within the City’s construction budget.

Task 2.5 Schematic Design Presentations
The MIG Team will participate in meetings to present
the design to key stakeholders as follows (meetings
assumed to be in person, unless stated otherwise):
• Parks and Recreation Commission
• Core community stakeholders (up to 5 virtual
meetings)
• Community Outreach Event (one in-person event,
City to provide Spanish translation; this event is an
opportunity to celebrate and mark the transition to
preparing construction drawings for the new park.)
• Cultural Arts Commission
• City Council
16 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park
PHASE 4: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION
(CD'S)
Based on the approved Design Development package
and incorporating the City’s consolidated DD comments
and direction, the MIG Team will prepare construction
documents, including construction drawings and
technical specifications, as well as opinions of probable costs at the milestones noted below. The MIG Team will
provide technical specifications in CSI format for the
City’s inclusion and collation with their own Division 1 documents and the project manual.

By the beginning of this phase, the City will provide
access to any City-required standard details, title blocks, requirements, and specifications.

All submittals will be in the form of a PDF submitted
digitally via email or other free file-sharing service
accepted by the City. Drawings will be prepared using
AutoCAD, with design plans shown at a minimum of 1" =
20'-0." Design documentation, including specifications, will be consistent with required federal, state, and local codes and regulations, as well as City of South San
Francisco requirements and design guidelines.

This scope assumes the development of one set of
construction drawings for a single-phase construction
project. If funding results in the need for phasing or
alternates, these can be provided for an additional fee.

The MIG Team will address the following disciplines in
the park design (consultants will provide both drawings and technical specifications for their discipline):
• Landscape Architecture (site and play area design,
site furnishings selection, and planting design)
• Civil Engineering (existing conditions, demo, utilities, storm drainage)
• Structural Engineering (minor landscape overhead
structures, miscellaneous site elements, walls, and
footings)
• Mechanical/Plumbing (drinking fountains or similar
minor elements)
• Electrical Engineering and Lighting Design (including security camera system and Wi-Fi access)
• Irrigation Design
Task 3.4 Design Review and Cost Estimate
Review Meeting
The MIG Team (with mack5 and other disciplines
as necessary) will participate in an extended
bi-weekly meeting (2 to 3 hours) to review the Design
Development package and cost estimate with the City
project team, to confirm design direction and discuss VE options, if needed, to bring the design within the City’s construction budget.

Task 3.5 Design Development Presentations
The MIG Team will participate in meetings to present
the updated design to key stakeholders as follows (up
to 6 meetings total; meetings assumed to be in person,
unless stated otherwise):
• Parks and Recreation Commission
• Core community stakeholders (up to 2 meetings)
• Community Outreach Event (one in-person event, City
to provide Spanish translation)
• Cultural Arts Commission
• City Council
Task 3.6 Ongoing Project Management and Team
Coordination
MIG will continue to coordinate the work of the design
team, monitoring the Project schedule and budget, as
well as project quality, and preparing and submitting
monthly invoices.

Design Development Deliverables:
• Final BOD document, incorporating SD comments
• 100% DD drawing set, coordinated across all design
team disciplines
• DD materials board and samples
• DD technical specifications with cut-sheet packet
showcasing major elements
• DD estimate of probable costs
• Meeting Notes and Action Summaries for MIG-led
meetings
• Updated project schedule
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 17
Task 4.4 Final Presentations
MIG will update illustrative exhibits for final presentation to the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City
Council (two in-person meetings).

Task 4.5 100% CD/Bid Set Submittal
Following the 90% review meeting, the MIG Team will
incorporate the City’s 90% comments to create the 100%
CD/Bid Set. MIG will provide a signed letter indicating the project has been coordinated and is ready for bid.

Construction Document Deliverables:
• 60% CD Submittal: drawings, technical specifications
• 60% Estimate of Probable Costs
• 90% CD Submittal: drawings, technical specifications
• 90% Estimate of Probable Costs
• Final Presentations
• 100% CD/Bid Set
• Meeting Notes and Action Summaries for MIG-led
meetings
• Updated project schedule
PHASE 5: PERMITTING AND BID/AWARD
Task 5.1 Permitting
MIG will submit 100% CD/Bid Set for permitting to
applicable City Departments. Permit packages will
be prepared as required to receive required building
permits (any permit fees are not included in the MIG
Team's proposal).

Task 5.2 Pre-bid Conference
MIG will attend the pre-bid conference to respond to
questions about the Construction Documents.

Task 5.3 Bid Assistance and Contract Approval
The MIG Team will support the City through the
permitting and bid period. Tasks are described below.
• Attend pre-permit application meeting with City
departments
• Prepare responses to bidders’ questions to clarify the Construction Documents
• If required, prepare addenda to bid documents
Task 4.1 Bi-Weekly Project Meetings
The MIG project manager will continue close contact
with the City’s project team through regular virtual
check-ins (typically 1 hour) every other week. At the
initial meeting of each submittal, MIG will review and
confirm the project schedule with the City.

Task 4.2 60% CD Submittal and Cost Estimate
The MIG Team will prepare construction documents to a
60% level of completion.

Task 4.2.1 60% Construction Plans and Details
The construction plans and details will be coordinated
across all disciplines.

Task 4.2.2 60% Technical Specifications
Technical specifications will be provided in CSI format.

Task 4.2.3 60% CD Opinion of Probable Costs
The opinion of probable costs will be updated based on
the 60% submittal.

Task 4.2.4 City Design and Cost Review Meeting
Following their review period, the City will provide
the MIG Team with a set of consolidated review
comments. These will be discussed in a two-hour virtual meeting to confirm design direction and discuss VE
options, if needed, to bring the design within the City’s construction budget
Task 4.3 90% CD Submittal
The MIG Team will prepare construction documents to
a 90% level of completion. MIG will perform a quality
control review before submission and coordinate the set across all disciplines.

Task 4.2.1 90% Construction Plans and Detail
Plans and details will be coordinated across all
disciplines.

Task 4.2.2 90% Technical Specifications
Technical specifications will be provided in CSI format.

Task 4.2.3 90% CD Opinion of Probable Costs
A final estimate of probable costs will be prepared
based on the 90% submittal.
18 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park
Task 6.3 Construction Meetings and Site visits
Prior to task 6.4, the MIG Team will visit the site to
review construction progress. Team members will
visit the site in accordance with the progress of their discipline’s work schedule. Site visits will be performed in accordance with the contractor’s progress (maximum
weekly, less frequently when progress is slower). This
scope assumes a maximum of 16 site visits by MIG’s
Project Manager prior to substantial completion. (Task
assumes a 10-month construction schedule; if the
schedule is extended, and/or additional site visits or
meetings are needed, they may be provided as an
additional service.)
Task 6.4 Punch List Site Visit and Preparation
When notified that the construction is substantially
complete, the MIG Team will make one site visit with the City’s representative, perform a Punch List inspection, and provide a consolidated “punch list” of observations for the contractor’s correction.

PHASE 7: PROJECT CLOSEOUT
Task 7.1 Final Punch List Site Visit
When notified that all punch list items have been
addressed, the MIG Team will make one final site visit
with the City’s representative to confirm all punch list items are complete.

Task 7.2 Closeout Document Review
MIG will review the close-out documents and as-built
drawings provided by the contractor against the final
permit set, to confirm the documentation is alignment
with the final implementation.

Task 7.3 Parks Staff Training
If needed, the MIG Team will provide information to
the City Parks staff related to the proper operation of installed equipment, as well as on-going maintenance.

Additional Services
The MIG Team has a broad range of experience, skills
and services. Services that have not been called out
specifically above, additional consultants, meetings, or submittals, may be provided following City approval of
the MIG Team’s additional services proposal.
• If needed, evaluate substitution requests
• Assist in evaluating and recommending of contractor
selection
• Assist City staff in preparation of materials for
presentation to City Council for approval of contract
for construction
Task 5.4 Prepare Conformed/Construction Set
The MIG Team will provide a Conformed/Construction
Set, incorporating clarifications to the 100% CD set
made during the bid process.

Task 5.5 Project Management and Team Coordination
MIG will continue to coordinate the work of the design
team, monitoring the Project schedule and budget, as
well as project quality, and preparing and submitting
monthly invoices.

Value engineering at Bid Phase is NOT included in the
basic scope. If bids are higher than anticipated due to unforeseen market conditions, the MIG Team will meet
with the Client to discuss options to move the project
forward. Any additional design, coordination or phasing submittals can be provided for additional services.

PHASE 6: CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
Task 6.1 Preconstruction Meeting Participation
If needed, the MIG Team will attend the City-scheduled
and lead Pre-Construction meeting to help clarify and
respond to questions related to project design intent.

Task 6.2 RFI’s, Submittals and Supplemental
Instructions
The MIG Team will make timely review of and take
appropriate action on the Contractor’s submittals such
as RFI’s, Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples,
to confirm conformance with the design intent of the
project and compliance with the information given in
the Contract Documents. When appropriate, the MIG
Team will provide supplemental instructions for the
contractor’s use.

City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 19

5. Proposed Staffing

TECHNICAL SUPPORT
• Lauren Ivey-Thomas, PLA, Deputy Project Manager,
Landscape Architect, MIG
• Noé Noyola, Community Engagement Specialist, MIG
• Senior Associate Principal Patrick Chan, PE, LEED
AP, and Senior Project Engineer Christian Anzelde,
PE, LEED AP, QSD/P, of BKF
• Principal Engineer Shane Rodacker, GE, of Geocon,
and Senior Project Engineer Andre Ashour, PE, of
Geocon
• Cost Estimator Cynthia Madrid of mack5
• Principal Mae R Kawamoto, PE, SE, and Douglas
Robertson, PE, SE, of Deadalus
• Principal Joel D. Cruz and Kristina Santi, LC, of
Interface Engineering
The MIG Team has access to a deep bench of
additional support personnel who may provide services
depending on project assignments. These include
specialists in historic and cultural landscapes, urban
design and planning, visualizations, graphic design,
ecology and restoration, and green infrastructure;
project associates; administrative staff; and project
accountants. They will be available throughout the
project as needed.

Team Resumes
Detailed resumes highlighting our key personnel's
qualifications are provided on the following pages.

The MIG Team
MIG has carefully selected a highly experienced
team of design professionals who offer the full range
of expertise required for the Linden Avenue Park
Landscape Architecture, Design, and Community
Facilitation Services.

PROECT MANAGEMENT
Principal-in-Charge José de Jesús Leal, PLA, ASLA,
draws on wisdom from nearly 25 years of landscape
architecture experience that includes award-winning
parks, streetscapes, and other public realm and
recreation projects throughout California. José will
ensure adequate resources are allocated to this project and that contractual requirements are met. He will
provide overall project direction, oversight, and quality control. Notable projects include Yanaguana Gardens
at Hemisfair Park in San Antonio, TX; Compton Creek
Natural Park in Compton; Hal Brown Park at Creekside
in Kentfield; and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation TeweKewe
Tending and Gathering Garden Conceptual Design in
Brooks.

Project Manager/Landscape Architect Jan Eiesland,
PLA, brings superior design and project management
skills that foster effective collaborations with design teams from early concepts through construction for
public realm spaces, including public parks, community
centers, schools, and civic landscapes. Notable projects include the Koret Children’s Quarters at Golden Gate
Park and Richmond Playground in San Francisco; Emma
Prusch Farm Park and Almaden Lake All-Inclusive
Playground in San José; Jollyman All-Inclusive Play Area in Cupertino; City of Newark Civic Center; and Los Altos Community Center.
20 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park

EDUCATION
• BS, Landscape Architecture,
University of California, Davis

REGISTRATIONS
• Landscape Architect: CA #5429

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
• American Society of Landscape
Architects (ASLA); Diversity
Summit Community Member
• America Walks Executive Board
Member

PRESENTATIONS
• Land as a Relation: Supporting
Indigenous Connection/
Reconnection Through (Un)
learning and Direct Action,
American Society of Landscape
Architecture National
Conference, 2022
• “Stolen, Resolution and
Renewal,” American Society
of Landscape Architecture
Oregon Chapter’s Virtual
Design Symposium, 2021.

OFFICE LOCATION
• Sacramento, CA
José de Jesús Leal, PLA, ASLA
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE | MIG
José Leal has been learning from and experiencing the natural environment since he was a child—whether it was working alongside his family picking avocados or oranges in an orchard or playing outside where he grew up.

In landscape architecture, he found a path to continuous discovery and a means for connecting people to place, history, and culture. His respect for the land and its resources is evident in his work as a designer and planner. He considers both ecological processes and human, animal, and plant systems, creating designs for places that respond to all. His Mexican and Nahua heritage has inspired José’s passion for Indigenous landscape architecture and how diverse Indigenous people have adapted to their natural environment. To José, every project represents an opportunity to build on the collective knowledge of the community and the place itself. His work ethic and tenacity ensure a steady generation of innovative ideas and solutions, while his technical expertise enables him to translate visions into physical form.

José has nearly 25 years of experience in landscape architecture for a diverse type of Native Nations and public agency projects. As Director of MIG’s Native Nations Building Studio, José leads an interdisciplinary group of designers and planners in providing services to Native Nations to support and strengthen Tribal communities’ cohesiveness, self-determination, and sovereignty through inclusive design and cultural relativism.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Yanaguana Gardens at Hemisfair Park, San Antonio, TX
• Hal Brown Park at Creekside, Kentfield, CA
• Compton Creek Natural Park, Compton, CA
• Koret Play Area at Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA • Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Village Plan, Auburn, WA
• Shasta–Takelma Indigenous Learning Garden, Ashland, OR • Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation TeweKewe Tending and Gathering Garden Conceptual Design, Brooks, CA
• Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Facilities Office Building, Brooks, CA • Nadaka Nature Park and Garden, Gresham, OR
• Mace Ranch Community Park, Davis, CA
• Main Street Dog Agility Park, Redwood City, CA
• Muir Park Renovation, Sacramento, CA
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 21

EDUCATION
• MLA, UC Berkeley
• BA, Architectural Studies,
University of Washington

REGISTRATIONS
• Landscape Architect:

CA #4893

OFFICE LOCATION
• Berkeley, CA
Jan Eiesland, PLA
PROJECT MANAGER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | MIG
Jan Eiesland has a passion for public spaces that get people outside to engage with their community and reconnect with the natural environment.

As a former free-range country kid turned city dweller, she understands the importance of access to the outdoors and how places can enhance and support our daily lives. Jan’s professional experience has been centered on the public realm, including public parks, community centers, schools, and civic landscapes. Her strong design and project management skills foster effective collaborations with design teams from early concepts through construction. Jan believes that good design can create real change at the community level—by providing a valued space with shared meaning. It should also appeal at the personal level—with artful, memorable elements that delight and surprise.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Koret Children’s Quarters, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA • Emma Prusch Farm Park, San José, CA
• Jollyman All-Inclusive Play Area, Cupertino, CA
• Red Morton Park and Stormwater Infrastructure, Redwood City, CA • Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail Master Plan, Cupertino, CA • Almaden Lake All-Inclusive Playground, San José, CA
• Richmond Playground, San Francisco, CA
• Winchester Whaley Neighborhoods’ Community Workshops, San José, CA • Cherryland Community Center, Cherryland, CA
• Children’s Zoo at Oakland Zoo, Oakland, CA
• Lions Wayside and Delucchi Parks, Pleasanton, CA
• Los Altos Community Center, Los Altos, CA
• Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Park, Santa Rosa, CA
• Morgan Park, Campbell, CA
• Newark Civic Center, Newark, CA
• Seven Hills School Main Campus, Walnut Creek, CA
• T+C Public Park and Trail, San Diego, CA
• Willard Middle School Grounds, Berkeley, CA
22 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park

EDUCATION
• MLA, Landscape Architecture,
University of California,
Berkeley
• MCP, City and Regional
Planning, University of
California, Berkeley
• AB, Architecture, Certificate
in Urban Studies, Princeton
University

REGISTRATIONS
• Landscape Architect:

CA #6620
• AICP Certified

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning
Association, Northern
California
• CED Alumni of Color

OFFICE LOCATION
• Berkeley, CA
Lauren Ivey-Thomas, PLA
DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | MIG
As an urban designer and landscape architect, Lauiren Ivey-Thomas is inspired by the interaction between landscape design, planning, and community building through active participation and engagement. Her varied portfolio ranges from the design of park sites to master planning public park and recreation networks. With a skill set encompassing the breadth of the profession, Lauren is confident in guiding projects from the initial stages of collaborative design through to construction. She is adept at design conceptualization, project management, design, construction documentation, and construction review and oversight. Her passion to create lasting design through community-based processes is a guiding principle in her work.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• James Kenney Park Renovation, Berkeley, CA*
• McInnis Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Dog Park, San Rafael, CA* • Schaefer Park / McKelvey Playfields, Mountain View, CA* • Rocky Graham Park, Marin County, CA*
• Hunters Point Shoreline, San Francisco, CA*
• University Club of Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA*
• Antioch Prewett Park Improvements, Antioch, CA*
• Andy’s Unity Park, Santa Rosa, CA*
• Pinnacles East Site Planning and Design, Pinnacles National Park, CA* • Citywide Parks Master Plan, Newark, CA*
• Dunphy Park Rehabilitation, Sausalito, CA*
• Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan, El Cerrito, CA* • Berkeley Tuolumne Camp, Groveland, CA*
• Patterson Community Complex Master Plan, Patterson, CA* • Mare Island Sports Fields, Vallejo, CA*
• Muir Woods Pedestrian Bridges and Trail Project, Muir Woods National Monument, Mill Valley, CA*
* Completed prior to joining MIG
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 23

EDUCATION
• MCP, University of California,
Berkeley
• BA, Political Science and
Spanish, Sonoma State
University

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
(APA)
AWARDS
• City of Salinas 2014-16
Housing and Community
Initiatives Public Outreach
Program, APA Northern
California Section Merit Award
for Public Outreach, 2017

OFFICE LOCATION
• Berekeley, CA
Noé Noyola
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SPECIALIST | MIG
Noé Noyola is a highly skilled and dedicated community planner and project manager whose projects have addressed the full range of urban planning and design issues—from transportation and housing to economic development and recreation. During a college-year abroad in Denmark, Noé lived in an urban environment that was “healthy,” not just in physical fitness, but in social interaction and connection—which led him to his chosen field. He is keenly aware of the emotional ties that people have to their communities and strives to acknowledge this so that people will engage more productively and authentically in his projects. Noé’s cultural competency—fluency in Spanish— and mastery of process and meeting facilitation enable him to effectively bridge technical content with impacted, and often under-served, stakeholder communities. A creative communicator and facilitator, he ensures an open and balanced exchange of information and ideas that paves the way for collective decision-making and results in positive outcomes.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Herz Playground Community Engagement, San Francisco, CA • Richmond Playground Design, Community Engagement, San Francisco, CA • Sacramento Parks Master Plan, Sacramento, CA
• San Gabriel Valley Greenway Network Plan, Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement, Los Angeles County, CA
• Cherryland Community Center Development, Outreach and Facilitation, Hayward Area Recreation and Parks District, CA
• Blossom Hill Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing over Hwy 17, Los Gatos, CA
• Bohemian Highway Bridge Replacement over Russian River, Monte Rio, CA • Shoreline Boulevard Bicycle/Pedestrian Overcrossing, Mountain View, CA • Highway 17 Access Management Plan, Community Outreach and Education, Santa Cruz County, CA
• Neighborhood Bridges Replacement Outreach, San Anselmo and San Rafael, CA
• Franklin Blvd Complete Streets Planning and Community Outreach, Sacramento, CA
• Salinas Housing and Community Development Needs Assessment, Salinas, CA
• Visión Salinas, Integrated Outreach and Project Identity, Salinas, CA • Downtown Specific Plan Grants Toolkit, Watsonville, CA • Chinatown Neighborhood Revitalization Plan, Stakeholder Engagement, Salinas, CA
24 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park

EDUCATION
• BS, Civil Engineering, Santa
Clara University

REGISTRATIONS
• Professional Civil Engineer, CA
No. 83189

OFFICE LOCATION
• San José, CA

EDUCATION
• BS, Civil Engineering,
California State University,
San José

REGISTRATIONS
• Professional Civil Engineer, CA
No. 85483

OFFICE LOCATION
• San José, CA
Patrick Chan, PE, LEED AP
SENIOR ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL | BKF
Patrick Chan has a broad base of civil engineering experience. Throughout his career, he has worked with both private- and public-sector clients.

He is responsible for many phases of project development ranging from preliminary studies to contract document preparation and construction administration. His experience includes residential, commercial, institutional and community-related projects.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Emma Prusch Farm Regional Park, San José, CA*
• Almaden Lake Park, San José, CA*
• Lawrence Mitty Park & Trail Master Plan, Cupertino, CA* • Jollyman Park Playground, Cupertino, CA*
• Elaine Richardson Park, San José, CA
• Vista Montana Park, San José, CA
• 1343 The Alameda Mini-Park, San José, CA
* Project Completed with MIG
Christian Anzelde, PE, LEED AP, QSD/P
SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | BKF
Since joining BKF Engineers, Christian Anzelde has consistently proven a strong work ethic, focus on customer service, and creative approach to all his designs. He brings a broad knowledge of local and regional approval processes with almost a decade of experience working with local agencies.

Day-to-day he supports projects by evaluating project conditions and providing technical support to the project team.

As a Senior Project Engineer, Christian is experienced in the design and development of many civic parks projects in the Bay Area. These projects include conceptual planning, underground utility design, site development, grading and drainage design, construction administration, and coordination with local and state agencies.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Emma Prusch Farm Regional Park, San José, CA*
• Almaden Lake Park, San José, CA*
• Jollyman Park Playground, Cupertino, CA*
• Lawrence Mitty Park & Trail Master Plan, Cupertino, CA* • Hampton Park, Cupertino, CA
* Project Completed with MIG
City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 25

EDUCATION
• BS, Civil Engineering,
Adamson University,
Philippines
• BS, Sanitary Engineering,
National University, Philippines

OFFICE LOCATION
• Oakland, CA

EDUCATION
• BS, Civil Engineering, North
Dakota State University

REGISTRATIONS
• Geotechnical Engineer:

CA # 2915
• Professional Engineer:

CA Civil # 63291

OFFICE LOCATION
• Livermore, CA
Cynthia Madrid, CPE
COST ESTIMATOR | MACK5
Cynthia Madrid has over 30 years of experience in the building profession working on behalf of cost consulting firms. Her extensive experience includes cost estimating, preparing bills of quantities, evaluation of change orders, value engineering, post-contract administration, cost reconciliation with thirdparty consultants/contractors, and peer review of cost estimates prepared by third-party consultants. She has expertise in recreation and public agency facilities, including retrofits/remodels/renovations, new construction, and assessments/feasibility/program-level cost plans and estimates. Cynthia has expertise on many projects with extensive civil scopes of work, including outdoor recreation. Her estimating experience includes parks facilities, recreational trails, and environmentally sensitive scope.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Helen Diller Civic Center Playgrounds, San Francisco, CA • Unity Park and Multi-Use Path, Richmond, CA
• Boorman Park, Richmond, CA
• Via Toledo Park, San Lorenzo, CA
• Fairmont Terrace Park, San Leandro, CA
Shane Rodacker, GE
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER | GEOCON
Shane Rodacker has 20+ years of experience conducting and managing geotechnical engineering services throughout Northern California. His practical methods of addressing unique problems during design and construction have been applied to transportation infrastructure, public facilities, master-planned communities, multifamily residential, and commercial developments. His expertise includes slope stability analysis, foundation design, pavement design, hillside grading, and the mitigation of complex geologic problems during land development.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Borel Park Improvements, San Mateo, CA
• East Hillsdale Park Improvements, San Mateo, CA
• Grand Boulevard Improvements,
South San Francisco, CA
• Piedmont Community Pool, Piedmont, CA
• Newark Civic Center, Newark, CA
26 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park

EDUCATION
• BS, Architectural Engineering,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
• BArch, Architecture, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo

OFFICE LOCATION
• San José, CA

EDUCATION
• BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Colorado,
Boulder

REGISTRATIONS
• Structural Engineer: CA (S
3424)

OFFICE LOCATION
• San José, CA
Mae R. Kawamoto, PE, SE
PRINCIPAL | DAEDALUS
Mae Kawamoto has designed various structures over the past 26 years, including custom residences, public and private school buildings, community centers, public art, and commercial buildings. Her experience ranges from new, ground-up construction to remodels, seismic upgrades, and evaluations of existing structures. She has a special interest in sustainable design and construction and follows LEED-certification updates and sustainable practices. Mae has a good rapport with design teams and contractors to ensure that solutions are efficient and sensible.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Los Altos Community Center, Los Altos, CA
• Hyde Street Mixed-Use, San Francisco, CA
• Gardner Community Center, San José, CA
• Mountain View Teen Center Remodel, Mountain View, CA
• Theater and Gymnasium, Ann Sobrato High School, Morgan Hill, CA • Theater Renovation and Amphitheater, Live Oak High School, Morgan Hill, CA
• Camden Community Center, LEED certified MPR and Gym, San José, CA Douglas Robertson, PE, SE
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER | DAEDALUS
Douglas Robertson has managed and directed the structural design of many diverse projects during his career spanning 38 years. Placing great attention on important project details while executing broader project goals pertaining to construction budget, schedule, and constructability, Doug has led many technologically innovative and diverse projects including new building design, seismic evaluation and strengthening, historic renovation and preservation, sustainable design, and implementation of energy dissipation technologies. Through careful study and collaboration, Doug has consistently helped owners and architects develop innovative design solutions while helping reduce costs.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Boeddeker Park and Clubhouse, San Francisco, CA
• Hayes Valley Playground and Clubhouse, San Francisco, CA • Jennifer Russel Community Center, Lafayette, CA
• Hayes Valley Playground and Clubhouse, San Francisco, CA • Jennifer Russel Community Center, Lafayette, CA
• Orange Park Community Center, South San Francisco, CA • Fremont Civic Center, Fremont, CA
• Performing Arts Center, Woodside High School, Woodside, CA City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 27

EDUCATION
• BS, Architecture, Far Eastern
University, Manila, Phillipines
• Associate of Science
Telecommunication
Technology, Skyline College

OFFICE LOCATION
• San Francisco, CA

EDUCATION
• BS, Electrical Engineering,
University of Sydney, Australia

REGISTRATIONS
• GBCA Accredited Professional
Lighting Certified

OFFICE LOCATION
• San Francisco, CA
Joel D. Cruz
PRINCIPAL | INTERFACE ENGINEERING
Joel Cruz has over 40 years of experience in electrical engineering design and is a Principal and Project Manager at Interface. Joel’s project experience includes parks, aquatic centers, and wellness, athletic, and recreation centers for both new and renovation construction projects. With a focus on project management, Joel works closely with architects, owners, and contractors in various phases of the project, from conceptualization and design to production and construction administration. Joel brings a balance of practical experience and technical knowledge to his work, designing cost-effective and functional projects.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Boeddeker Park Community Center, San Francisco, CA
• Herz Playground, San Francisco, CA
• Richmond Playground Renovation, San Francisco, CA
• Martial Cottle Park, Santa Clara, CA
• East Bay Regional Park District Tilden Environmental Education Center, Berkeley, CA
• San Pablo Park Restroom Remodel, Berkeley, CA
Kristina Santi, LC
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL | INTERFACE ENGINEERING
Kristina Santi has over 15 years of experience in lighting and electrical engineering. Kristina has managed multiple projects and teams both internationally and locally. Kristina excels at providing both aesthetically pleasing and technically sound lighting projects with a focus on energy efficiency. Her experience as an electrical engineer has provided her with budget awareness within her designs as well as a solid knowledge base of current codes and standards.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Boeddeker Park and Clubhouse, San Francisco, CA
• Hayes Valley Playground and Clubhouse, San Francisco, CA • Jennifer Russel Community Center, Lafayette, CA
• Hayes Valley Playground and Clubhouse, San Francisco, CA • Jennifer Russel Community Center, Lafayette, CA
• Orange Park Community Center, South San Francisco, CA • Fremont Civic Center, Fremont, CA
• Performing Arts Center, Woodside High School, Woodside, CA 28 City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park

6. Conflict of interest
Statement
Conflict of Interest
MIG, Inc., has no financial, business, or other
relationship with the City of South San Francisco that
may have an impact upon the outcome of the contract
of the construction project. We have no current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of
this contract or the construction project that will follow.

MIG has no financial interest or relationship with any
construction company that might submit a bid on the
construction project.

7. Litigation
Litigation History
MIG, Inc., has been involved in the following litigation:
2009, Information and Referral Federation of
Los Angeles County v. Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman:

Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC357401.

MIG was hired to develop an online database/hotline
for 211LA. Client disputed original scope of work and
sued for contract compliance. Jury trial was decided
unanimously in MIG’s favor.

MIG has had no additional litigation or claims.

City of South San Francisco | Linden Avenue Park 29
Compton Creek Natural Park, Compton, CA

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
City of South San Francisco I Linden Park
e s t i m a t e d p r o j e c t c o s t
Hexagon
(Traffic)
Daedalus
(Structural)
Mack5
(Cost
Estimator)
Hrs@ $195 Hrs@ $185 Hrs@ $165 Hrs@ $155 Hrs@ $165 Hrs@ $120 Phase 1 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (14 Weeks)

1.1 Project Kick-off Meeting & Site Tour 6 $1,170 8 $1,480 6 $990 $0 6 $990 4 $480 30 $5,110 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $420 $6,030

1.2 Bi-weekly Project Meetings (virtual) $0 6 $1,110 12 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 18 $3,090 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $3,590

1.3.1 Review of Existing Conditions and Background Documents $0 $0 12 $1,980 1 $155 $0 8 $960 21 $3,095 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $5,095

1.3.2 Existing Site Conditions Confirmation $0 2 $370 6 $990 1 $155 $0 6 $720 15 $2,235 $10,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,900 $13,135

1.3.3 Traffic Assessment and ROW Concept Design (Allowance) 2 $390 4 $740 4 $660 $0 $0 2 $240 12 $2,030 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $32,030

1.3.4 Site Clean-up Investigation $0 4 $740 6 $990 $0 $0 $0 10 $1,730 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $2,230

1.4 Base File Set-up and Opportunity's/Constraints Analysis $0 2 $370 8 $1,320 $0 $0 16 $1,920 26 $3,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,610

1.5 Prepare to Engage 2 $390 8 $1,480 8 $1,320 $0 12 $1,980 28 $3,360 58 $8,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,038 $5,038 $13,568

1.6 Community Engagement--Listen, Learn, Vision 10 $1,950 24 $4,440 32 $5,280 $0 30 $4,950 28 $3,360 124 $19,980 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $31,980

1.7 Preferred Concept Development 6 $1,170 12 $2,220 12 $1,980 2 $310 $0 20 $2,400 52 $8,080 $1,500 $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $3,500 $11,580

1.8 Preferred Concept Presentations 10 $1,950 16 $2,960 32 $5,280 $0 16 $2,640 $0 74 $12,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 $13,030

1.9 Engagement - Translation Services 1 $195 1 $185 2 $330 $0 12 $1,980 $0 16 $2,690 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 $3,890

1.10 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination 4 $780 12 $2,220 16 $2,640 $0 $0 4 $480 36 $6,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,120 Subtotal 41 $7,995 99 $18,315 156 $25,740 4 $620 76 $12,540 116 $13,920 492 $79,130 $15,900 $30,000 $0 $2,000 $5,038 $52,938 $13,820 $145,888 Phase 2 SCHEMATIC DESIGN (10 Weeks)

2.1 Bi-weekly Project Meetings (virtual) $0 5 $925 8 $1,320 $0 $0 $0 13 $2,245 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,245

2.2 Prepare Basis of Design Document $0 2 $370 12 $1,980 4 $620 $0 8 $960 26 $3,930 $2,000 $0 $500 $1,500 $0 $4,000 $7,930

2.3 Develop Schematic Design Package 2 $390 12 $2,220 32 $5,280 2 $310 $0 32 $3,840 80 $12,040 $8,500 $0 $1,000 $3,500 $6,028 $19,028 $31,068

2.4 Design and Cost Estimate Review Meeting $0 2 $370 6 $990 $0 $0 $0 8 $1,360 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $412 $1,412 $2,772

2.5 Schematic Design Presentations 4 $780 24 $4,440 24 $3,960 $0 6 $990 $0 58 $10,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 $10,370

2.6 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination 2 $390 3 $555 12 $1,980 $0 $0 2 $240 19 $3,165 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,165 Subtotal 8 $1,560 48 $8,880 94 $15,510 6 $930 6 $990 42 $5,040 204 $32,910 $11,500 $0 $1,500 $5,000 $6,440 $24,440 $200 $57,550 Phase 3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (8 weeks)

3.1 Bi-weekly Project Meetings (virtual) $0 4 $740 8 $1,320 $0 $0 $0 12 $2,060 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,060

3.2 Final BOD Document $0 $0 4 $660 2 $310 $0 4 $480 10 $1,450 $1,000 $0 $0 $2,500 $0 $3,500 $4,950

3.3 Develop Design Development Package 2 $390 12 $2,220 56 $9,240 $0 $0 72 $8,640 142 $20,490 $12,000 $0 $2,000 $10,500 $7,050 $31,550 $52,040

3.4 Design and Cost Estimate Review Meeting $0 3 $555 6 $990 $0 $0 $0 9 $1,545 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $412 $1,412 $2,957

3.5 Design Development Presentations 2 $390 18 $3,330 16 $2,640 $0 $0 $0 36 $6,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 $6,560

3.6 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination 2 $390 4 $740 12 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 18 $3,110 $800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $3,910 Subtotal 6 $1,170 41 $7,585 102 $16,830 2 $310 0 $0 76 $9,120 227 $35,015 $14,800 $0 $2,000 $13,000 $7,462 $37,262 $200 $72,477 Direct
Costs
MIG, Inc. Subconsultants
Principal-in-Charge
Jan Eiesland Lauren Ivey-Thomas
Project Manager,
Landscape Architect
Jose Leal
Deputy PM. And
Landscape Architect
Professional
Fees
Totals
MIG
Totals
BKF
(Civil)
Sub
Totals
Interface
(MEP and
Lighting
Design)
Project Associate,
Designer
Dino Viale
Irrigation Designer
Noe Noyola
Community
Engagement
Specialist
MIG, Inc. | Page 1 City of South San Francisco, Linden Park | Fee Proposal City of South San Francisco I Linden Park
e s t i m a t e d p r o j e c t c o s t
Hexagon
(Traffic)
Daedalus
(Structural)
Mack5
(Cost
Estimator)
Direct
Costs
MIG, Inc. Subconsultants
Principal-in-Charge
Jan Eiesland Lauren Ivey-Thomas
Project Manager,
Landscape Architect
Jose Leal
Deputy PM. And
Landscape Architect
Professional
Fees
Totals
MIG
Totals
BKF
(Civil)
Sub
Totals
Interface
(MEP and
Lighting
Design)
Project Associate,
Designer
Dino Viale
Irrigation Designer
Noe Noyola
Community
Engagement
Specialist
Phase 4 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION (18 weeks)

4.1 Bi-weekly Project Meetings (virtual) $0 6 $1,110 12 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 18 $3,090 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,090

4.2 60% Construction Documents Submittal & Cost Estimate 1 $195 12 $2,220 32 $5,280 24 $3,720 $0 60 $7,200 129 $18,615 $13,000 $0 $2,500 $7,500 $9,094 $32,094 $50,709

4.3 90% Construction Documents Submittal & Cost Estimate 1 $195 12 $2,220 32 $5,280 24 $3,720 $0 64 $7,680 133 $19,095 $11,000 $0 $3,500 $5,500 $9,094 $29,094 $48,189

4.4 Final Presentations 4 $780 6 $1,110 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 $1,890 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80 $1,970

4.5 100% CD/Bid Set Submittal 4 $780 6 $1,110 12 $1,980 4 $620 $0 12 $1,440 38 $5,930 $5,000 $0 $1,500 $3,000 $0 $9,500 $15,430

4.6 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination $0 6 $1,110 12 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 18 $3,090 $800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $3,890 Subtotal 10 $1,950 48 $8,880 100 $16,500 52 $8,060 0 $0 136 $16,320 346 $51,710 $29,800 $0 $7,500 $16,000 $18,188 $71,488 $80 $123,278 Phase 5 PERMITTING AND BID/AWARD (8 weeks)

5.1 Permitting $0 2 $370 4 $660 $0 $0 12 $1,440 18 $2,470 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $40 $6,510

5.2 Pre-bid Conference (virtual) $0 2 $370 2 $330 $0 $0 $0 4 $700 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $1,700

5.3 Bid Assistance and Contract Approval Allowance 2 $390 8 $1,480 12 $1,980 4 $620 $0 12 $1,440 38 $5,910 $2,000 $0 $400 $2,000 $0 $4,400 $10,310

5.4 Prepare Conformed/Construction Set (PDF + AutoCAD) $0 4 $740 8 $1,320 $0 $0 12 $1,440 24 $3,500 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $7,500

5.5 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination $0 1 $185 4 $660 $0 $0 2 $240 7 $1,085 $800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $1,885 Subtotal 2 $390 17 $3,145 30 $4,950 4 $620 0 0 38 $4,560 91 $13,665 $11,800 $0 $400 $2,000 $0 $14,200 $40 $27,905 Phase 6 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION (40 weeks)

6.1 Pre-construction Meeting Attendance (virtual) $0 2 $370 2 $330 $0 $0 $0 4 $700 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $1,700

6.2 RFI's, Submittals and Supplemental Instructions 2 $390 32 $5,920 56 $9,240 $0 $0 12 $1,440 102 $16,990 $4,000 $0 $1,800 $1,800 $0 $7,600 $24,590

6.3 Construction Meetings and Site Visits $0 160 $29,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 160 $29,600 $7,000 $0 $1,200 $4,200 $0 $12,400 $800 $42,800

6.4 Punch List Site Visit and Preparation $0 6 $1,110 6 $990 $0 $0 $0 12 $2,100 $1,200 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $2,200 $40 $4,340 Subtotal 2 $390 200 $37,000 64 $10,560 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,440 278 $49,390 $13,200 $0 $3,000 $7,000 $0 $23,200 $840 $73,430 Phase 7 PROJECT CLOSEOUT (8 weeks)

7.1 Final Punch List Site Visit $0 $0 7 $1,155 $0 $0 $0 7 $1,155 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40 $1,195

7.2 Closeout Document Review $0 2 $370 2 $330 $0 $0 $0 4 $700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700

7.3 Parks Staff Training Information $0 2 $370 8 $1,320 $0 $0 4 $480 14 $2,170 $0 $0 $600 $0 $0 $600 $2,770

7.4 Operations & Maintenance Manual (PDF) 6 $1,170 8 $1,480 16 $2,640 $0 $0 32 $3,840 62 $9,130 $0 $0 $600 $0 $0 $600 $9,730 Subtotal 6 $1,170 12 $2,220 33 $5,445 0 $0 0 $0 36 $4,320 87 $13,155 $0 $0 $1,200 $0 $0 $1,200 $40 $14,395 75 $14,625 465 $86,025 579 $95,535 68 $10,540 82 $13,530 456 $54,720 1,725 $274,975 $97,000 $30,000 $15,600 $45,000 $37,128 $224,728 $15,220 $514,923 5% Markup (Direct Costs/Administrative) $11,236 $761 $11,997 $526,920
Optional Tasks
Topographic Survey and Existing Utility Documentation (BKF) Provided by City Optional Tasks Subtotal N/A

SUBTOTAL

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
MIG, Inc. | Page 2 City of South San Francisco, Linden Park | Fee Proposal City of South San Francisco I Linden Park
e s t i m a t e d p r o j e c t c o s t
Geocon
(Geotech)
Daedalus
(Structural)
Mack5
(Cost
Estimator)
Hrs@ $195 Hrs@ $185 Hrs@ $165 Hrs@ $155 Hrs@ $165 Hrs@ $120 Phase 1 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (14 Weeks)

1.1 Project Kick-off Meeting & Site Tour 6 $1,170 8 $1,480 6 $990 $0 6 $990 4 $480 30 $5,110 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $420 $6,030

1.2 Bi-weekly Project Meetings (virtual) $0 6 $1,110 12 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 18 $3,090 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $3,590

1.3.1 Review of Existing Conditions and Background Documents $0 $0 12 $1,980 1 $155 $0 8 $960 21 $3,095 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $5,095

1.3.2 Existing Site Conditions Confirmation $0 2 $370 6 $990 1 $155 $0 6 $720 15 $2,235 $10,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,900 $13,135

1.3.3 Geotechnical Report $0 1 $185 4 $660 $0 $0 2 $240 7 $1,085 $0 $17,950 $0 $0 $0 $17,950 $19,035

1.3.4 Site Clean-up Investigation $0 4 $740 6 $990 $0 $0 $0 10 $1,730 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $2,230

1.4 Base File Set-up and Opportunity's/Constraints Analysis $0 2 $370 8 $1,320 $0 $0 16 $1,920 26 $3,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,610

1.5 Prepare to Engage 2 $390 8 $1,480 8 $1,320 $0 12 $1,980 28 $3,360 58 $8,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,038 $5,038 $13,568

1.6 Community Engagement--Listen, Learn, Vision 10 $1,950 24 $4,440 32 $5,280 $0 30 $4,950 28 $3,360 124 $19,980 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $31,980

1.7 Preferred Concept Development 6 $1,170 12 $2,220 12 $1,980 2 $310 $0 20 $2,400 52 $8,080 $1,500 $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $3,500 $11,580

1.8 Preferred Concept Presentations 10 $1,950 16 $2,960 32 $5,280 $0 16 $2,640 $0 74 $12,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 $13,030

1.9 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination 4 $780 12 $2,220 16 $2,640 $0 $0 4 $480 36 $6,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,120 Subtotal 38 $7,410 95 $17,575 154 $25,410 4 $620 64 $10,560 116 $13,920 471 $75,495 $15,900 $17,950 $0 $2,000 $5,038 $40,888 $12,620 $129,003 Phase 2 SCHEMATIC DESIGN (10 Weeks)

2.1 Bi-weekly Project Meetings (virtual) $0 5 $925 8 $1,320 $0 $0 $0 13 $2,245 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,245

2.2 Prepare Basis of Design Document $0 2 $370 12 $1,980 4 $620 $0 8 $960 26 $3,930 $2,000 $0 $500 $1,500 $0 $4,000 $7,930

2.3 Develop Schematic Design Package 2 $390 12 $2,220 32 $5,280 2 $310 $0 32 $3,840 80 $12,040 $8,500 $0 $1,000 $3,500 $6,028 $19,028 $31,068

2.4 Design and Cost Estimate Review Meeting $0 2 $370 6 $990 $0 $0 $0 8 $1,360 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $412 $1,412 $2,772

2.5 Schematic Design Presentations 4 $780 24 $4,440 24 $3,960 $0 6 $990 $0 58 $10,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 $10,370

2.6 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination 2 $390 3 $555 12 $1,980 $0 $0 2 $240 19 $3,165 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,165 Subtotal 8 $1,560 48 $8,880 94 $15,510 6 $930 6 $990 42 $5,040 204 $32,910 $11,500 $0 $1,500 $5,000 $6,440 $24,440 $200 $57,550 Phase 3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (8 weeks)

3.1 Bi-weekly Project Meetings (virtual) $0 4 $740 8 $1,320 $0 $0 $0 12 $2,060 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,060

3.2 Final BOD Document $0 $0 4 $660 2 $310 $0 4 $480 10 $1,450 $1,000 $0 $0 $2,500 $0 $3,500 $4,950

3.3 Develop Design Development Package 2 $390 12 $2,220 56 $9,240 $0 $0 72 $8,640 142 $20,490 $12,000 $0 $2,000 $10,500 $7,050 $31,550 $52,040

3.4 Design and Cost Estimate Review Meeting $0 3 $555 6 $990 $0 $0 $0 9 $1,545 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $412 $1,412 $2,957

3.5 Design Development Presentations 2 $390 18 $3,330 16 $2,640 $0 $0 $0 36 $6,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 $6,560

3.6 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination 2 $390 4 $740 12 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 18 $3,110 $800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $3,910 Subtotal 6 $1,170 41 $7,585 102 $16,830 2 $310 0 $0 76 $9,120 227 $35,015 $14,800 $0 $2,000 $13,000 $7,462 $37,262 $200 $72,477 Phase 4 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION (18 weeks)

4.1 Bi-weekly Project Meetings (virtual) $0 6 $1,110 12 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 18 $3,090 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,090

4.2 60% Construction Documents Submittal & Cost Estimate 1 $195 12 $2,220 32 $5,280 24 $3,720 $0 60 $7,200 129 $18,615 $13,000 $0 $2,500 $7,500 $9,094 $32,094 $50,709

4.3 90% Construction Documents Submittal & Cost Estimate 1 $195 12 $2,220 32 $5,280 24 $3,720 $0 64 $7,680 133 $19,095 $11,000 $0 $3,500 $5,500 $9,094 $29,094 $48,189

4.4 Final Presentations 4 $780 6 $1,110 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 $1,890 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80 $1,970

4.5 100% CD/Bid Set Submittal 4 $780 6 $1,110 12 $1,980 4 $620 $0 12 $1,440 38 $5,930 $5,000 $0 $1,500 $3,000 $0 $9,500 $15,430

4.6 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination $0 6 $1,110 12 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 18 $3,090 $800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $3,890 Subtotal 10 $1,950 48 $8,880 100 $16,500 52 $8,060 0 $0 136 $16,320 346 $51,710 $29,800 $0 $7,500 $16,000 $18,188 $71,488 $80 $123,278 Phase 5 PERMITTING AND BID/AWARD (8 weeks)

5.1 Permitting $0 2 $370 4 $660 $0 $0 12 $1,440 18 $2,470 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $40 $6,510

5.2 Pre-bid Conference (virtual) $0 2 $370 2 $330 $0 $0 $0 4 $700 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $1,700

5.3 Bid Assistance and Contract Approval Allowance 2 $390 8 $1,480 12 $1,980 4 $620 $0 12 $1,440 38 $5,910 $2,000 $0 $400 $2,000 $0 $4,400 $10,310

5.4 Prepare Conformed/Construction Set (PDF + AutoCAD) $0 4 $740 8 $1,320 $0 $0 12 $1,440 24 $3,500 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $7,500

5.5 Ongoing Project Management and Team Coordination $0 1 $185 4 $660 $0 $0 2 $240 7 $1,085 $800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $1,885 Subtotal 2 $390 17 $3,145 30 $4,950 4 $620 0 0 38 $4,560 91 $13,665 $11,800 $0 $400 $2,000 $0 $14,200 $40 $27,905 Phase 6 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION (40 weeks)

6.1 Pre-construction Meeting Attendance (virtual) $0 2 $370 2 $330 $0 $0 $0 4 $700 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $1,700

6.2 RFI's, Submittals and Supplemental Instructions 2 $390 32 $5,920 56 $9,240 $0 $0 12 $1,440 102 $16,990 $4,000 $0 $1,800 $1,800 $0 $7,600 $24,590

6.3 Construction Meetings and Site Visits $0 160 $29,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 160 $29,600 $7,000 $0 $1,200 $4,200 $0 $12,400 $800 $42,800

6.4 Punch List Site Visit and Preparation $0 6 $1,110 6 $990 $0 $0 $0 12 $2,100 $1,200 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $2,200 $40 $4,340 Subtotal 2 $390 200 $37,000 64 $10,560 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,440 278 $49,390 $13,200 $0 $3,000 $7,000 $0 $23,200 $840 $73,430 Phase 7 PROJECT CLOSEOUT (8 weeks)

7.1 Final Punch List Site Visit $0 $0 7 $1,155 $0 $0 $0 7 $1,155 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40 $1,195

7.2 Closeout Document Review $0 2 $370 2 $330 $0 $0 $0 4 $700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700

7.3 Parks Staff Training Information $0 2 $370 8 $1,320 $0 $0 4 $480 14 $2,170 $0 $0 $600 $0 $0 $600 $2,770 Subtotal 0 $0 4 $740 17 $2,805 0 $0 0 $0 4 $480 25 $4,025 $0 $0 $600 $0 $0 $600 $40 $4,665 66 $12,870 453 $83,805 561 $92,565 68 $10,540 70 $11,550 424 $50,880 1,642 $262,210 $97,000 $17,950 $15,000 $45,000 $37,128 $212,078 $14,020 $488,308 5% Markup (Direct Costs/Administrative) $10,604 $701 $11,305 $499,613
Project Associate,
Designer
Dino Viale
Irrigation Designer
Noe Noyola
Community Engagement
Specialist
Professional
Fees
Totals
MIG
Totals
BKF
(Civil)
Sub
Totals
Interface
(MEP and
Lighting
Design)
Direct
Costs

SUBTOTAL

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
MIG, Inc. Subconsultants
Principal-in-Charge
Jan Eiesland Lauren Ivey-Thomas
Project Manager,
Landscape Architect
Jose Leal
Deputy PM. And
Landscape Architect