Cities Index.
CT_Master_Plan_Report_Updated January 2025

South San Francisco City Council
July 9, 2025

Document
CT_Master_Plan_Report_Updated January 2025
Meeting
July 9, 2025
Body
South San Francisco City Council
Pages
5
Original file
64.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ci-ssf-ca.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL
REVISED JANUARY 2025

MASTER PLAN

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL

MASTER PLAN
Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture. Inc
prepared by
REVISED JANUARY 2025
TRAIL

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
Mayor and City Council
Flor Nicolas, Mayor
Mark Nagales, Vice Mayor
Mark Addiego, Council Member
James Coleman, Council Member
Eddie Flores, Council Member
William Lock, Chair
Steven Firpo, Vice Chair
Ruth DeNardi, Secretary
Michael Aires (2019-2021)
Betty Battaglia
Kristy Camacho
Brittany Burgo (beginning 2/2022)
Robert Uy
Brian Fletcher, President
Nate Ritchie, Project Manager
Zach Katz, Job Captain
Dania Castro, Project Designer
Alice Deng, Project Designer
City Staff
Philip Vitale, Cap. Projects Deputy Director
Greg Mediati, P & R Director
Sharon Ranals, Assistant City Manager
Jacob Gilchrist, Director of Capital Projects
Angela Duldulao, Recreation Manager
Brian Noce, Acting Supervisor
Devin Stenhouse, Recreation Supervisor
Veronica Ortiz, Rec. & Comm. Services Program Coordinator Laura Armanino, Rec. & Comm. Services Supervisor
Ercie Santos, Cultural Arts Specialist
Mike Mulkerrins, Rec. & Comm. Services Supervisor
Austin Navarro, Rec. & Comm. Services Coordinator
Kelli Jo Cullinan, Rec. & Comm. Services Rec. Supervisor Bill Stridbeck, Rec. & Comm. Services Coordinator
Marcus Nava, Aquatics Club Coach
Erin O’Brien, Rec. & Comm. Services Supervisor
Joshua Richardson, Parks Division Manager
Zachary Kust, Parks Maintenance Supervisor
Brandon Cutajar, Parks Maintenance Supervisor
Adena Friedman, Principal Planner
Nell Selander, Econ. & Comm. Development Director
Kari Jung, Administrative Assistant II
Catherine Misener, Administrative Assistant II
Kimberly Morrison, Assistant Supervisor
Brian Crume, Facilities Manager
Parks and Recreation
Commission
Consultant Team

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Introduction ................................................................................................5 History ...........................................................................................................5 Master Plan Goals.......................................................................................7

2. SITE UNDERSTANDING
Existing Conditions ....................................................................................9 New Opportunity Areas .........................................................................10 New Developments .................................................................................10

3. OUTREACH PROCESS
Overview .....................................................................................................13 Public Outreach........................................................................................14 Stakeholder and Committee Meetings ..............................................18 Survey Data Collection...........................................................................20

4. CONCEPT PLANS
Overview .....................................................................................................23 Preferred Plan............................................................................................23 Opportunity Areas....................................................................................23 Other Special Areas.................................................................................29 General Recommendations ..................................................................30

5. IMPLEMENTATION
Cost Estimate .............................................................................................35 Funding Sources........................................................................................35

6. APPENDIX
Appendix A – Meeting Summaries
Appendix B – Survey Results Summaries
Appendix C – Design Alternatives
Appendix D – Preferred Concept Plan
Appendix E – Cost Estimates
Appendix F – Regulatory Signage
Appendix G – Opportunity Area 1 Improvements

E X E C U T I V E

SUMMARY
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Centennial Way is a multi-use trail and linear
park that runs the entire length of South San
Francisco above underground BART tunnels
that connect the South San Francisco BART
station with the San Bruno BART station. The
trail was constructed on land that was left
open after the BART/SFO Airport Extension
project was completed in 2003. As part of
the comprehensive agreement with the
affected communities, BART envisioned a
trail and linear park extending from Coma
to Millbrae. However, South San Francisco
is the only city that completed this vision.

Planning for the trail started in the late
1990’s and resulted in a trail master plan
that was completed in 2003. The master
plan provided guidance for the overall trail
alignment and was used to secure grant
funding for implementation. The trail was
constructed in two phases, beginning in
2006, with the last phase being completed
in 2009. Although the trail is continuous for
the entire length of the City, large areas
of land within the trail corridor remained
undeveloped.

In 2020, the City entered into an agreement
with BART that allowed for more land within
the trail corridor to be enhanced with
additional improvements. The agreement
also makes it possible to add much needed
park acreage in a built-out community,
with the goal of achieving 3 acres / 1000
residents to meet the needs of projected
population growth. There are also several
new land development projects nearby or
directly adjacent to the trail corridor that
are under construction or planned for the
future. These factors prompted the City to
update the original master plan.

Site Photo - Trail activity during a typical day, taken near the dog park in June 2021. 2 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
This master plan for Centennial Way trail
seeks primarily to explore what amenities
could be developed on the newly available
land within the trail corridor and study
how the trail relates to new adjacent land
developments. The recommendations are
based on an extensive outreach process
that engaged the community and various
stakeholder groups, in order to ensure that
the plan is responsive to current needs and
preferences.

The outreach process was centered
around a series of events and meetings that
were attended by the greater community,
special stakeholder groups, and various
City committees. Participants were asked
to offer opinions on how the trail could
be improved, and also to comment on
draft design alternatives. This allowed the
master plan to slowly develop in stages,
being guided by the feedback that was
received along the way.

What started with ranking ideas for
amenities along the trail, evolved into
design alternatives for areas with the most
potential for enhancement. The design
alternatives were then refined into a
preferred plan for the entire trail length.

The preferred plan is presented in this
master plan as a high level design concept,
along with a written description and
general recommendations. The cost of
improvements is broken into phases to assist
with securing funding for implementation.

Revisions have been made to this master
plan following its original adoption in
February 2023. All text changes are
shown in italic font. Also, improvements
have already been constructed within
Opportunity Area 1, which is shown in
Appendix G.

Trail improvements on land owned by the
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
(SFPUC) were added to the master plan in
October 2024 after additional coordination
occurred between the City and the SFPUC.

Although the SFPUC expressed general
approval of the master plan improvements,
further review and approval by the SFPUC
would be necessary during future design
phases before improvements on SFPUC
property could be constructed.

This plan does not make decisions or
commitments about project approvals or
priorities, but rather helps inform the City
regarding scopes and estimated costs of
potential projects that would be subject
to independent decisions by the City and
environmental review as/when necessary.

Site Photo - Trail plaza north of the Spruce Avenue intersection with interpretive signage.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Site Photo - View of trail with Sign Hill in the background, taken after construction during wildflower season. 01 INTRODUCTION
&BACKGROUND
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 5

1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Introduction
Centennial Way Trail is a prized linear park
through South San Francisco. The trail
corridor is constructed above underground
BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) tunnels that
connect the South San Francisco BART
station with the San Bruno BART station.

Although widely used today for recreation
and commuting, there is unused land
within the trail corridor with potential for
adding additional amenities to provide
even greater benefit to the community.

Changes in land use and new
developments along the trail corridor are
also factors affecting future trail use.

This master plan is intended to replace the
original trail master plan, which provided
guidance for initial trail construction
and has largely already achieved
implementation.

History
The BART/SFO Airport Extension was an
ambitious undertaking to expand BART
connectivity toward the airport. The
project extended the reach of BART trains
to the cities of Colma, South San Francisco,
San Bruno, and Millbrae with a spur off the
main line to the San Francisco International
Airport. Construction was completed in
2003.

The land used for the BART extension
was historically part of a Southern Pacific
Railroad line that ran from San Francisco
to San Jose. The rail line was rerouted and
the old alignment was abandoned until
BART purchased the right of way in 1996 for
construction of the extension.

The BART train tracks within South San
Francisco were constructed entirely
underground. The South San Francisco
BART station is at the north end of the
City and the San Bruno BART station is just
outside the southern City limit. The tracks
connecting the two BART stations are within
underground tunnels. There are several
BART support structures on the surface
above the tunnels, but most of the land
within the corridor has potential for other
uses. This provided an exciting opportunity
to create something special that could run
through the City.

For nearly a decade, the City of South San
Francisco anticipated the development of
Site Photo - Trail entry sign and information kiosk.
6 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
a Linear Park associated with the new BART
station. In 1997, the City Council approved
a Comprehensive Agreement between
BART and the City of South San Francisco
relating to the BART/SFO Airport Extension.

Within the Agreement, BART and the City
acknowledged that BART and SamTrans
would cooperate to obtain approvals and
funding for a bike path along the entire
length of the BART/SFO Airport Extension
project through South San Francisco. The
City agreed to cooperate with the transit
agencies in an effort to secure project
funding. The Comprehensive Agreement
contained wording indicating that the
bike path would contain amenities
such as benches, lighting, and minimal
landscaping.

The City also funded and supported
several planning efforts for the creation
of a Transit Village and a city-wide Linear
Park. The BART Transit Village Plan and
Ordinance was designed to create an
active pedestrian-oriented center in the
City associated with the newly constructed
South San Francisco BART Station. The
Linear Park was introduced to residents at
community meetings during the General
Plan Update process. The Linear Park was
a designated land use in the South San
Francisco General Plan, adopted in 1999.

In 2002, planning for the Linear Park
continued with the creation of a master
plan to guide future development. An initial
design was produced for the trail corridor,
which was used by the City to secure a
grant funding for the master planning
process. The outcome was the initial Linear
Park Master plan, which was completed in
2003, near the same time as the BART/SFO
Airport Extension.

The initial master plan provided guidance
for the construction of the Linear Park.

The master plan outlined a preferred trail
alignment, street crossings, and possible
connections to adjacent land uses. It also
provided suggestions for trail amenities
such as site furnishings, wayfinding
elements, and landscaping. Construction
cost and a phasing plan was included,
which helped the trail come to fruition.

The trail was constructed in two phases
starting in 2006. The first phase began
on the southern City limit at Huntington
Avenue and was constructed north to West
Orange Avenue. Phase two spanned from
West Orange Avenue to the northern City
limit at McLellan Drive. The second phase
of the trail was completed in 2009. The
Linear Park was renamed to Centennial
Way in 2008 to commemorate the City’s
100th birthday.

In 2020, the City entered into a new
maintenance agreement with BART that
allowed for more land along Centennial
Way to be enhanced with additional
improvements. The City agreed to maintain
additional portions of land adjacent to
Centennial Way and in exchange was
granted permission to construct trail
amenities within the new land areas.

In addition to the new agreement with
BART, several new land development
projects adjacent to the trail were either
starting construction or planned for the
near future. This includes new transit
oriented developments planned along the
Huntington Corridor as envisioned in the
recent General Plan Update. Some of the
developments would adjoin directly to the
trail, which offers not only the opportunity to
cater to new residents, but also to expand
resources for current residents. New land
development is also a potential funding
source, as in some cases developers
may elect to construct improvements as
identified in the master plan.

The combination of the BART maintenance
agreement and new land development
created a need to update the previous
trail master plan. The City obtained funding
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 7

1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
from the Local Early Action Planning grant
to update the master plan, and the process
began in early 2021.

The updated trail master plan was
originally adopted in February 2023,
and then amended in October 2024.

Changes since the original adoption
include proposed improvements within
SFPUC property between Spruce Avenue
and West Orange Avenue, and the
construction of improvements between
Huntington Avenue and Spruce Avenue.

These changes are indicated in italic
font throughout the master plan, and
information about the constructed
improvements has been added as
Appendix G.

Master Plan Goals
This master plan update for Centennial
Way seeks to develop a comprehensive
approach and achieve the following goals:
• Engage the community
and stakeholders to better
understand desired amenities and
improvements.
• Explore opportunities on newly
available land within the trail
corridor.
• Study how the trail relates to
adjacent planned developments,
and establish trail design
guidelines for future development
interfaces.
• Enhance connections to adjacent
land uses, both visual and physical.
• Recognize that the trail is now 15
years old and needs restoration to
respond to the City’s current needs
for recreation facilities and trail user
preferences.

These goals were achieved through an
extensive process which is described in
the following sections. The process started
by gaining a thorough understanding
of the existing site and usage pattens.

This was combined with a study of new
land developments either planned
or under construction adjacent to
the trail. To ensure the master plan
was responsive to current community
needs and desires, a series of meetings
were organized to collect feedback
from the public and stakeholders.

EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL

HUNTINGTON
AVENUE

SPRUCE AVENUE
W. ORANGE
AVENUE

CHESTNUT
AVENUE

MCLELLAN
DRIVE
ORANGE

MEMORIAL
PARK

SAN BRUNO
BART

STATION

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION
NORTH

EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL

HUNTINGTON
AVENUE

SPRUCE AVENUE
W. ORANGE
AVENUE

CHESTNUT
AVENUE

MCLELLAN
DRIVE
ORANGE

MEMORIAL
PARK

SAN BRUNO
BART

STATION

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION
NORTH
SEGMENT 1
HUNTINGTON TO SPRUCE SPRUCE TO W.ORANGE
W.ORANGE TO

CHESTNUT
SEGMENT 2 SEGMENT 3 SEGMENT 4

CHESTNUT TO MCLELLAN
Figure 1 - Map of overall trail alignment.
02 SITE

UNDERSTANDING
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 9

2. SITE UNDERSTANDING
Existing Conditions
Centennial Way trail spans the entire city
of South San Francisco running north-south
from the South San Francisco BART Station
on the north to the San Bruno BART Station
on the south. The trail itself is a 10-footwide multi-use (bicycle and pedestrian) asphalt path with 2-foot shoulders on each
side. It offers bench seating and additional
elements such as informational kiosks and
interpretive panels that are concentrated
at small plazas near street intersections. The
trail corridor is mostly rolling topography
with non-irrigated grasses and some
drought tolerant trees and shrubs.

Site Photo - Image of typical trail section and current pavement condition.

With modest amenities, one of the trail’s
main assets is its connectivity. It crosses
three major streets (Spruce Avenue, West
Orange Avenue, and Chestnut Avenue),
and connects popular destinations such
as Tanforan Shopping Center, Orange
Memorial Park, Centennial Way Dog Park,
and the new Community Civic Campus.

The trail also provides access to surrounding
neighborhoods through several entry
points, and unpaved foot paths exist in
locations where a formal connection has
not been provided.
10 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
New Opportunity Areas
One of the reasons that Centennial Way
has developed primarily as a means of
transportation is limitations that had been
placed on the land where it is constructed.

The trail corridor is largely owned by BART,
and is constructed on top of its underground
tunnels. Since inception, placing amenities
on the land surrounding the trail has not
been allowed per the terms of the original
agreement with BART.

With a new agreement between the City
and BART, there is greater potential to
expand what amenities the trail can offer,
especially in three larger areas dispersed
throughout the corridor. These three areas
have been designated as “opportunity
areas.” The first and largest area is between
Huntington Avenue and Spruce Avenue.

The second opportunity area is between
Spruce Avenue and West Orange Avenue.

The last opportunity area is north of
Chestnut Avenue, between Mission Road
and Colma Creek.

New Developments
In addition to the new opportunity areas,
there are several land developments
either under construction or in planning
stages adjacent to the trail which will offer
their own amenities as well as attracting
more potential trail users. Additionally,the
construction of the Community Civic
Campus at Chestnut Avenue will provide
a police station, library, parks & recreation
services, and a community theater / City
Council chambers.

New residential and multi- use land
developments, in various stages of planning
and/or construction, that are directly
adjacent to the trail corridor include
Southline (adjacent to the San Bruno BART
Station), 1477 Huntington Avenue, Nine88
Apartments (788 El Camino Real), and 1051
Mission Road. Southline is planned as a 25-
acre development comprised of office
and retail space. Once constructed, it will
provide publicly accessible open space
on-site and will improve the Centennial
Way corridor adjacent to the site. 1477
Huntington Avenue will create a new

OPPORTUNITY
AREA
1 OPPORTUNITY
AREA
2 OPPORTUNITY
AREA

OPPORTUNITY
AREA
1 OPPORTUNITY
AREA
2 OPPORTUNITY
AREA

OPPORTUNITY
AREA
2 OPPORTUNITY
AREA
3 Figure 2 - Images of three opportunity areas. Refer to map on the next page for locations.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 11

2. SITE UNDERSTANDING

MATCH LINE SEE ABOVE RIGHT

MATCH LINE SEE LEFT

CHESTNUT AVE
ORANGE

MEMORIAL
PARK

PENINSULA
PINES

APARTMENTS
NINE 88 CIVIC

COMMUNITY
CAMPUS

EL CAMINO REAL
1051 MISSION
RD
1051 MISSION RD

W ORANGE AVE

COLMA CREEK

GRAND AVE
OAK

MISSION RD

EL CAMINO REAL

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO BART

STATION

MISSION RD

SEQUOIA
HOLLY
AVE
KAISER

HOSPITAL
3 MCLELLAN DR
LEGEND
Trail
New Opportunity Area
Adjacent Project
Pedestrian Connection
1 Photograph Location

MATCH LINE SEE BELOW LEFT

EL CAMINO REAL

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO HIGH
SCHOOL

HOUSING

AUTHORITY

SOUTH LINE
1477 HUNTINGTON

HUNTINGTON AVE

TANFORAN AVE

SPRUCE AVE

W ORANGE AVE MATCH LINE SEE BELOW LEFT
MAPLE
AVE
C ST
2 1
NORTH
public trail connection from Huntington
Avenue. Nine88 Apartments will offer a
public fitness park, while the 1051 Mission
Road residential development plans to
provide a public playground, fitness court,
lawn area, and market hall for retail use.

These new developments warrant great
consideration when planning for the future
Figure 3 - Map showing opportunity areas, new developments, and trail connections. of Centennial Way and its amenities. Not only
will the new developments help facilitate
increased trail use, they will influence what
type of trail amenities are most suitable to
offer nearby.

Since this master plan was originally adopted
in February 2023, improvements in Opportunity
Area 1 have already been constructed and
are documented in Appendix G.
03 OUTREACH

PROCESS
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 13

3. OUTREACH PROCESS
Overview
An essential part to a successful master
plan is receiving input during development
to ensure the plan represents the needs
and preferences of project stakeholders
and end users. The Centennial Way master
plan is a product of feedback received
from the local community and several
stakeholder groups that were engaged
during a series of in-person and online
events and meetings. The events and
meetings took place over several months
where the same participants had the
opportunity to monitor progress and ensure
their voices were being heard.

The outreach process was designed to
gather broad preferences at first and slowly
refine the design documents in response to
the comments received. In the beginning
of the process, outreach participants were
encouraged to express their ideas and
desires without a preformed agenda. Only
after initial feedback was received were
design alternatives prepared. The design
alternatives were eventually critiqued and
refined into a single preferred alternative,
which was further vetted through more
review.

In order to maximize efficiency, the outreach
process for updating the Centennial Way
master plan was combined with outreach
for updating the City’s Orange Memorial
Park master plan. Both projects were
similar and the combined effort worked to
broaden public interest and reach a larger
audience.
2022
JUL
AUG
SEPT
OCT
NOV
DEC
2021
FEB
JAN
MAR
APR

FINAL MASTER PLAN

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REFINED MASTER PLAN
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING #2

DRAFT MASTER PLAN

P A R K S & R E C R E A T I O N
COMMISSION MEETING #1
OUTREACH EVENTS & COMMUNITY MEETING #2
OUTREACH EVENTS & COMMUNITY MEETING #1

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT & MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES
Figure 4 - Outreach process diagram showing meetings and events that occured prior to the 2023 master plan adoption.
14 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
Components of the outreach process
are described in the following sections.

Summaries of outreach meetings are
provided in Appendix A.

Public Outreach
Pop-up Events
In order to have a successful outreach
program it is necessary to get the word out.

In addition to announcements delivered
via the City’s website, email newsletters,
and publications, the design team
attended various public events to engage
with the community. These pop-up events
included Movie Night at Orange Park, the
July Field Day event, the City Hall Birthday
Celebration, and Halloween at Orange
Park. During the pop-up events, the
design team handed out flyers, collected
feedback, and advertised upcoming
community meetings.

Graphics Displays & Social Media
To augment the meetings described
below, the City also posted master plan
graphics at various locations throughout
the City and asked the public to comment
by answering survey questions. Displays
were posted at the Orange Memorial Pool,
Roberta Cerri Teglia Senior Center, and
Municipal Services Building. Additionally,
meetings and other opportunities for input
were advertised through several social
media platforms.

Community Meeting #1
At the first open house, the City and
design team introduced the master plan
process by sharing the project background
and goals. After reviewing a site analysis
showing opportunities and constraints, the
public was asked to vote on images that
represented potential site amenities that
they wanted to see in the forthcoming
concept plans. General comments and
Outreach Photo - Pop-up event, Movie Night at Orange Park.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 15

3. OUTREACH PROCESS
ideas were also documented with written
notes.

Community Meeting #2
At the second open house, the community
was presented with two alternatives for
each of the three opportunity areas.

The design alternatives were based
on feedback received during the first
community meeting. Alternatives for
Opportunity Area #1 are shown on the
following page, and all design alternatives
are shown in Appendix C. Preferences for
each alternative were collected through
survey questions and written notes.

Parks and Recreation Commission
Meeting #1
The design team presented a summary
of the public outreach process and
comments received to the Parks and
Recreation Commission, along with
the design alternatives that had been
developed for each opportunity area. The
Commission provided further input, which
was used to develop a preferred plan.

Parks and Recreation Commission
Meeting #2
During a second meeting with the
Commission, a preferred plan was
presented for the entire trail corridor
along with a written master plan report.

Commission comments were recorded
and used to further refine the master plan
documents.

Parks and Recreation Commission
Meeting #3
A third commission meeting was held in
September 2024 to review improvements
within Opportunity Area #2 that
were added to the master plan after
coordination with the SFPUC.

Outreach Photo - Sign-in table at Community Meeting #1. 16 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN

WN AREA ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND PICNIC/ SEATING AREA
1477 HUNTINGTON
9 9 4
5 3 57 10
6 EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN
3 OF SPRUCE AVENUE)
1477 HUNTINGTON
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
1 2
4 7 7
6 6 5
1477 HUNTINGTON
9 9 4
5 3 57 10
6 EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN
3 OF SPRUCE AVENUE)
1477 HUNTINGTON
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
1 2
4 7 7
6 6 5

SKATE PARK BIKE PUMP TRACK LAWN AREA

HUNTINGTON

SOUTH LINE

SOUTH MAPLE AVE
AVE

HUNTINGTON
AVE
OPPORTUNITY AREA 1 (SOUTH OF SPR
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2

SOUTH LINE

SOUTH MAPLE AVE
1 SKATE PARK BIKE PUMP TRACK LAWN AREA

HUNTINGTON

SOUTH LINE

SOUTH MAPLE AVE
AVE

HUNTINGTON
AVE
OPPORTUNITY AREA 1 (SOUTH OF SPR
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2

SOUTH LINE

SOUTH MAPLE AVE
1 SKATE PARK 1 BIKE PUMP TRACK 2 LAWN AREA 3

HUNTINGTON

SOUTH LINE

SOUTH MAPLE AVE
AVE

HUNTINGTON
AVE
OPPORTUNITY AREA 1 (SOUTH OF SPR
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2

SOUTH LINE

SOUTH MAPLE AVE
1 Figure 5 - Preliminary design alternatives for Opportunity Area #1.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 17

FITNESS STATION

MORE LIGHTING AT NIGHT

SOCCER FIELD

GAME AREA

PUBLIC ART
8 9
10 SPRUCE AVE
68 SPRUCE AVE
8 MORE LIGHTING AT NIGHT

SOCCER FIELD

GAME AREA
8 9
10 SPRUCE AVE
68 0 40’ 80’ 160’

SPRUCE AVE
8 ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND PICNIC/ SEATING AREA FITNES
1477 HUNTINGTON
9 9 4
5 3 5
6 7 10
8 6

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN
3 RUCE AVENUE)
1477 HUNTINGTON
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
1 2
4 7 7 8
6 6 5
4 5 6

BIKE PUMP TRACK LAWN AREA ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND PICNIC/ S N

SOUTH LINE

APLE AVE
1477 HUNTIN
AVE
9 9 4
5 3 7
6 N
AVE

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN

IRATION IMAGERY
3 ORTUNITY AREA 1 (SOUTH OF SPRUCE AVENUE)
RNATIVE 1
RNATIVE 2

SOUTH LINE

MAPLE AVE
1477 HUNTIN
(NEW RESIDE
(NEW RESIDE
1 2
7 6 6 5
2 3 4 5

SKATE PARK BIKE PUMP TRACK LAWN A

HUNTINGTON

SOUTH LINE

SOUTH MAPLE AVE
AVE

HUNTINGTON
AVE

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
TRAIL

INSPIRATION IMAGERY
OPPORTUNITY AREA 1 (SOUTH OF
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2

SOUTH LINE

SOUTH MAPLE AVE
1 2 3

ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND PICNIC/ SEATING AREA FITNESS STATION

MORE LIG

SOCCER F

PUBLIC AR
7 8
9 1477 HUNTINGTON
SPRU
9 9 4
5 3 57 10
6 EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN
3 SPRUCE AVENUE)
1477 HUNTINGTON
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)

SPRUCE AVE
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
1 2
4 7 7 8
6 6 5
4 5 6

ATING AREA FITNESS STATION

MORE LIGHTING AT NIGHT

PUBLIC ART
7 8
TON
IAL)

SPRUCE AVE
4 7 8
6 S PLAYGROUND PICNIC/ SEATING AREA FITNESS STATION

MORE LIGHTING AT NIGHT

SOCCER FIELD

PUBLIC ART
7 8
9 1477 HUNTINGTON
SPRUC
4 5 3 57 10
6 EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN
3 E)
1477 HUNTINGTON
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)

SPRUCE AVE
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
4 7 8
6 5
5 6

TING AREA FITNESS STATION

MORE LIGHTING AT NIGHT

SOCCER FIELD

PUBLIC ART
7 8
9 ON
SPRUC
510
ON
IAL)

SPRUCE AVE
IAL)
4 7 8
6 S PLAYGROUND PICNIC/ SEATING AREA FITNESS STATION

MORE LIGHTING AT NIGHT

SOCCER FIELD

GAME AREA

PUBLIC ART
7 8
9 10
1477 HUNTINGTON

SPRUCE AVE
4 5 3 5
6 7 10
8 6

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN
3 E)
1477 HUNTINGTON
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)

SPRUCE AVE
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)
4 7 8
6 5
5 6
NORTH
NORTH
18 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
City Council Meeting
A presentation summarizing the entire
outreach process was presented to the
City Council along with the master plan
documents. The Council was asked to
provide comments on the master plan,
which were incorporated before the final
document was adopted.

Stakeholder and Committee
Meetings
In addition to the community events and
meetings described above, the design
team gave presentations to several
stakeholder groups and committees
throughout the outreach process. All the
groups were asked to provide feedback,
which was combined with input received
during public outreach.

The City organized meetings with four
stakeholder groups. Members of each
stakeholder group are listed below:
• Property and Landowners: Members of
this group included BART, developers
involved in new projects along the trail
corridor, Kaiser Hospital, San Mateo
County, Calwater, Barbara Butler,
Coma Creek Visioning Group, and the
towns of San Bruno and Colma.
• Community: This group represented
the South San Francisco Unified School
District, Boys and Girls Club, Mothers
Club, Park Lane Apartments, Youth
Advisory Council, Community Garden
Group, Special Needs Group, Dog
Owners Group, Artist Studio Users,
Cultural Arts Commission, and SSF
Friends of Parks and Recreation.
• Recreation: This group included
representatives for Soccer, Softball/
Baseball, Swimming, Bocce Ball,
Pickleball, Tennis, Outdoor Fitness,
Seniors, Skateboarders, and BMX Bike
Riders.
• City Staff: Members of various
City departments were gathered
including the Recreation Division, the
Parks Division, Aquatics, Recreation
Classes, Childcare, Cultural Arts,
Rentals, Seniors, Organized Sports,
Special Events/Publicity, and Parks
Maintenance.

The design team met with each stakeholder
group twice in virtual meetings to present
the project and collect comments.

Although not every member was present
during the stakeholder meetings, everyone
that received an invitation was provided
with a written meeting summary and
encouraged to fill out an online survey, as
well as submit written comments after the
meeting.

Master plan design documents were also
shared at meetings with different City
committees. Presentations were given
to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee and the Design Review Board
during regular meetings for those groups.

These meetings were intended to give
each group an overview of the master
plan update process and offered a way to
receive even more feedback.

Improvements within SFPUC property were
presented at a Project Review meeting in
July 2024, and additional meetings were
held with SFPUC staff to discuss land use
restrictions. This was to ensure that trail
improvements on SFPUC property would
avoid conflicts with SFPUC operations and
services.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 19
Figure 6 - Outreach flyer advertising upcoming events and online surveys.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
3 Master Plans, 1 Process
Help Envision your Community

ARTS TRAIL PARK

CITYWIDE CENTENNIAL ORANGE
+ +
PARK
ORANGE
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL
Online Survey Online Survey
For more information and updates, visit:
https://www.ssf.net/PRMasterPlans
ARTS +TRAIL+PARK
Please take a few minutes to complete the
following online surveys. Either scan the QR
codes or use the web links provided below.

Upcoming Event
The Great Pumpkin, South City
Saturday, October 23, 2021
12:00 pm - 2:00 pm
Orange Memorial Park
781 Tennis Drive
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Community Open House #2
Saturday, November 06, 2021
10:00 am - 1:00 pm
Joseph A. Fernekes Building in
Orange Memorial Park
781 Tennis Drive
South San Francisco, CA 94080
We Want to Hear from You!
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/
centennialwaytrail2
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/
orangememorialpark2
Survey answers are due November 12th.

Figure 6 - Outreach flyer advertising upcoming events and online surveys. 20 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
Survey Data Collection
The purpose of the outreach process
described above was to collect input that
would guide master plan development.

During the outreach process, the primary
means of gathering feedback was through
a series of surveys. Surveys were offered to
event and meeting participants; and also
advertised to the general public through
flyers, newsletters, City publications, social
media platforms, and the City’s website.

The initial survey was released prior to
Community Meeting #1 and asked
participants to rank potential trail amenities
and also provide their own ideas for how
they would like the trail to be improved.

The survey was offered online and also in
paper format at Community Meeting #1.

Survey questions were also integrated
into the Agents of Discovery app, which
was tailored to a younger audience and
allowed input through a scavenger hunt
format.

The second survey was released prior to
Community Meeting #2 and provided
a means of collecting comments on
preliminary design alternatives for each
opportunity area. The survey was offered
online and also in paper format at the
community meeting. The online version of
the survey was converted to Spanish, in
order to reach a wider audience.

A summary of the survey results is presented
in the Appendix B.

Figure 7 - Graph of survey data indicating public preferences for possible trail amenities. 20 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
More lighting at night
Nature areas
Community garden
Picnic areas
Fitness station
Lawn area
Playground
Public art
Bicycle pump track
Another dog park
Interpretive signage
Shared mobility
Skatepark
Soccer field
Pickleball
Frisbee golf
What amenities would you like to see on the trail?
Survey Data Collection
The purpose of the outreach process
described above was to collect input that
would guide master plan development.

During the outreach process, the primary
means of gathering feedback was through
a series of surveys. Surveys were offered to
event and meeting participants; and also
advertised to the general public through
flyers, newsletters, City publications, social
media platforms, and the City’s website.

The initial survey was released prior to
Community Meeting #1 and asked
participants to rank potential trail amenities
and also provide their own ideas for how
they would like the trail to be improved.

The survey was offered online and also in
paper format at Community Meeting #1.

Survey questions were also integrated into
the Agents of Discovery app, which was
tailored to a younger audience and allowed
input through a scavenger hunt format.

The second survey was released prior to
Community Meeting #2 and provided a
means of collecting comments on preliminary
design alternatives for each opportunity
area. The survey was offered online and
also in paper format at the community
meeting. The online version of the survey was
converted to Spanish, in order to reach a
wider audience.

A summary of the survey results is presented
in the Appendix B.

Figure 7 - Graph of survey data indicating public preferences for possible trail amenities.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 21

3. OUTREACH PROCESS

SSF HIGH SCHOOL W ORANGE AVE

LOS CERRITOS

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
2 3
1 6 HIGH SCHOOL

CONNECTION

HIGH SCHOOL EXISTING TRAIL CONNECTION TO REMAIN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

CONNECTION

SSF HIGH SCHOOL

LOS CERRITOS

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
3 5 4
2 3
1 EXISTING TRAIL

TO REMAIN W ORANGE AVE
To fill out this survey online, go to https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/centennialwaytrail2 or scan the QR code. If you have questions or would like more information, please email [email protected] Survey answers are due November 12th.

English Español
We Want to Hear from You!

CENTENNIAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN SURVEY
OPPORTUNITY AREA #2 (SPRUCE TO ORANGE AVENUE)
Have you attended any previous meetings related to the Centennial Trail master planning process? Yes
How far from Centennial Trail do you live?
Less than a 10 minute walk
A 10 to 20 minute walk
Which statement below represents how often you visit Centennial Trail? Once a day
Once a week
Once a month
No
More than a 20 minute walk
I don’t live in South San Francisco
Once a year
Never
I don’t know
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2

NATURE AREA PICNIC/ SEATING AREA FITNESS STATION

SKATE PARK BIKE PUMP TRACK OUTDOOR CLASSROOM
1 2
5 3
4 6
Why did you choose that alternative?
How can your preferred alternative be improved?
What else would you like to see at Opportunity Area 2?
Which alternative do you prefer for Opportunity Area 2? Alternative 1 Alternative 2
Figure 8 - Public survey requesting feedback on Opportunity Area #2. 04 CONCEPT PLANS
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 23

4. CONCEPT PLANS
Overview
The concept plan described in the
following sections is the product of the
outreach process and is intended to
serve as a general framework for future
improvements along Centennial Way. The
selection and placement of amenities is
based on the feedback received from
the public, stakeholders, and committees
that participated in outreach meetings
and events. The drawings are not meant to
show final designs for amenity areas, but to
provide general direction, program, and
inspiration. Detailed design development
would be necessary prior to implementing
improvements.

Although the preferred plan is described
below, it was preceded by multiple design
alternatives. Two design alternatives were
produced for each of the three opportunity
areas. The design alternatives are provided
in Appendix C for reference.

Preferred Plan
The entire preferred plan is shown in
Appendix D and described below. The
plan begins at the southern trail terminus
and continues up to the north end of
the City. For its entire length, the main
trail is consistent with the alignment that
exists today. All improvements shown are
alongside the existing trail.

Opportunity Areas
The majority of trail amenities are
concentrated in opportunity areas that
were identified during the outset of
the design process. These opportunity
areas have the most consolidated
space available for placement of larger
amenities.

Site Photo - Openness of Opportunity Area #1.
24 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN

BART VENTILATION

STRUCTURE

SOUTHLINE DEVELOPMENT
(FUTURE OFFICE / COMMERCIAL)

BIKE PUMP TRACK
(BID ALTERNATIVE)

MAPLE AVE

HUNTINGTO

SOUTHLINE AVE
(FUTURE)
CISCO
NEW TREE, TYP.

INFORMAL SP

PRACTICE FIE

TEMPORARY

HYDROSEED

SKATE SPACE FITNESS STATION
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP.

EXISTING TRE

TO REMAIN,

SEATING AREA

EXISTING TRA
REMAIN, TYP.

PUBLIC ACC

HUNTINGTON
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

SPRUCE AVE

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN

NODE AND

CROSSWALK TO
REMAIN

BART STRUCTURE
Figure 9 - Opportunity Area #1 viewed from within the open lawn, showing seating located in front of the future residential development.

Figure 10 - Preferred alternative for Opportunity Area #1. Refer to Appendix G for plans and photographs that show what was actually constructed.

NORTH
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 25

4. CONCEPT PLANS

SAN BRUNO

KEY MAP
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.
0 1477 HUNTINGTON
(FUTURE RESIDENTIAL)

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

CITY OF SAN BRUNO

POTENTIAL ACCESS TO
1477 HUNTINGTON
PORTS
ELD

PLAYGROUND

PICNIC/ SEATING
AREA

OUTDOOR CLASSROOM

POLLINATOR GARDEN WITH

INTERPRETIVE PANELS
EE
TYP.

IL TO
NEW PLANTING, TYP.

LAWN AREA

CESS TO

N AVENUE

NEW SHRU

GROUNDC

PLANTING

HEIGHT TO

VISIBLITY A

BART VENTILATION STRUCTURE

EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA
Opportunity Area 1
The first opportunity area is between
Huntington Avenue and Spruce Avenue,
and is shown below. Key aspects of the
preferred plan for Opportunity Area 1 are
as follows:
• There is a high level of support for
a bike pump track. A pump track
is a circuit of rollers, banked turns
and features designed to be ridden
completely by riders generating
momentum by “pumping” instead of
pedaling. A pump track needs a large
flat area and can be grouped with
skate spaces, since those two uses are
compatible.
• Based on discussions and outreach to
stakeholders, it was determined that
a series of integrated skate spaces
along Centennial Way would be more
desirable than a traditional skate park
in Orange Park.
• Formal soccer fields were explored
in Design Alternative #2, but were
abandoned in favor of an informal
practice field. Formalized soccer
fields would require parking in close
proximity due to transfer of players of
varying abilities and equipment along
with additional supporting amenities,
such as restrooms, that could not be
accommodated at this site.
26 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
• More traditional park uses are
located in front of the planned 1477
Huntington residential development,
to not only serve the public but also to
complement residential amenities.
• Multiple access points from the trail
corridor to 1477 Huntington are
encouraged, with the main public
access point to Huntington Avenue
planned on the south side of the
development.

Opportunity Area 2
The second opportunity area is between
Spruce Avenue and West Orange Avenue,
and is shown below. This segment of the
trail is primarily located on SFPUC property.

Although the SFPUC expressed general
approval of the master plan improvements
shown in this report, further review and
approval by the SFPUC would be necessary
during future design phases.

FERRED PLAN 1 OF 8
TRAIL

ENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN

SOUTHLINE DEVELOPMENT
(FUTURE OFFICE / COMMERCIAL)

BIKE PUMP TRACK
(BID ALTERNATIVE)

LINE AVE
UTURE)
CITY

CITY OF SAN BRUNO

CITY OF SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO
NEW TREE, TYP.

INFORMAL SPORTS

PRACTICE FIELD

TEMPORARY

HYDROSEED

SKATE SPACE FITNESS STATION
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP.

EXISTING TREE
TO REMAIN, TYP.

SEATING AREA

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

PUBLIC ACCESS TO

HUNTINGTON AVENUE
TRAIL

SSF HIGH SCHOOL
N
LA
A

NEW SHRUB AND

GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP. (LOW

HEIGHT TO MAINTAIN

VISIBLITY AND NO
TREES)

PROPERTY LINE,
TYP.
12 FT. WIDE VEHICULAR

ACCESS TO GROUNDWATER
FACILITIES, TYP. EITHER

AGGREGATE OR GRASS

POROUS PAVING

SECONDARY

NATURE TRAIL

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

BENCH SEATING,
TYP.

LEARNING

LIGHTED PATH
BOLLARD, TYP.

LARGE STRUB
MASS, TYP.

FITNESS

STATION
WITH
BENCH

SEATING

INTERPRETIVE

SIGN WITH SFPUC

EDUCATIONAL

CONTENT
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

SPRUCE AVE

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN

NODE AND

CROSSWALK TO
REMAIN
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP. EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

BART STRUCTURE
EXIST
Based on feedback received during the
outreach process and from the SFPUC,
improvements in this area should consider
the following:
• Amenities need to be compatible with
the site sloping downward to the east.
• Improvements must remain clear of
SFPUC groundwater facilities. Depth
of excavation within SFPUC property
should be minimal and trees or
structures that require footings are
prohibited, including additional light
poles.
• Amenities that surpass what
is commonly associated with
recreational trail facilities, such as an
outdoor classroom and skate space,
must be located on BART property.
• Fitness stations are desired throughout
Figure 11 - Preferred alternative for Opportunity Area #2.

NORTH
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 27

4. CONCEPT PLANS

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
0 20’ 40’ 80’
1477 HUNTINGTON
(FUTURE RESIDENTIAL)

POTENTIAL ACCESS TO
1477 HUNTINGTON

PLAYGROUND

PICNIC/ SEATING
AREA

OUTDOOR CLASSROOM

POLLINATOR GARDEN WITH

INTERPRETIVE PANELS
NEW PLANTING, TYP.

LAWN AREA
E
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL
JULY 1, 2024

NEW SHRUB AND

GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP. (LOW

HEIGHT TO MAINTAIN

VISIBLITY AND NO
TREES)

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

BENCH S
TYP.

LIGHTED
BOLLARD, TYP.

LARGE STRUB
MASS, TYP.

FITNESS

STATION
WITH
BENCH

SEATING

PREFERRED PLA
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP. EXISTIN
REMAIN

KEY MAP
ATIVE

ANDSCAPE
AREA

EXISTING

BENCH TO
REMAIN, TYP.

EXISTING SFPUC GROUNDWATER

FACILITIES TO REMAIN, PROVIDE
REQUIRED CLEARANCE, TYP.

LEARNING PATH

INTERPRETIVE
SIGN, TYP OF 4

EXISTING TREE TO
REMAIN, TYP.

SFPUC PROPERTY

BART PROPERTY

WIDEN EXISTING
TRAIL BY 3’

WHERE POSSIBLE

FITNESS

STATION

WITH BENCH

SEATING
0 20’ 40’ 80’

BART VENTILATION STRUCTURE

ING DRAINAGE AREA

FITNESS STATION
SEATIN
AREA A
CONN
MISSIO

PEDESTRIAN
LIGHT, TYP.

PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

NEW PLANTING, TYP.

LOS C

ELEMENTA
PROPE
TYP.

OUTDOOR CLASSR

AGGREGATE BASE

LOG SEATING AND

BOULDERS

WIDEN EXISTING
TRAIL BY 3’

WHERE POSSIBLE

BOYS AND GIR
Character Image - A skate space integrated with
surrounding landscape. Photo Credit: Spohn Ranch
the trail, and some equipment could
be located within this segment.

Opportunity Area 3
The third opportunity area is north of
Chestnut Avenue, between Mission Road
and Colma Creek, and is shown on the
next page. Key aspects of the preferred
plan for Opportunity Area 3 are as follows:
• Outdoor fitness, seating, and nature
areas could potentially be used by
Kaiser Hospital staff and patients via a
future bike/pedestrian bridge across
Colma Creek that is identified in the
General Plan.
• More trail connections are desired to
Mission Road.
• There is support for another dog park to
complement the existing dog park near
Orange Park.
28 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
REFERRED PLAN 1 OF 8
TRAIL

ENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
1, 2024

INFORMAL SPORTS

PRACTICE FIELD

TEMPORARY

HYDROSEED

SKATE SPACE FITNESS STATIONEXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
JULY 1, 2024

SSF HIGH SCHOOL
NATIVE
LANDS
AREA

NEW SHRUB AND

GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP. (LOW

HEIGHT TO MAINTAIN

VISIBLITY AND NO
TREES)

PROPERTY LINE,
TYP.
12 FT. WIDE VEHICULAR

ACCESS TO GROUNDWATER
FACILITIES, TYP. EITHER

AGGREGATE OR GRASS

POROUS PAVING

SECONDARY

NATURE TRAIL

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

BENCH SEATING,
TYP.

LEARNING

LIGHTED PATH
BOLLARD, TYP.

LARGE STRUB
MASS, TYP.

FITNESS

STATION
WITH
BENCH

SEATING

INTERPRETIVE

SIGN WITH SFPUC

EDUCATIONAL

CONTENT
PREFERRED PLAN 2 OF 8
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP. EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

EXISTING D

MISSION RD

SEQUOIA
LN

COLMA CREEK

FITNESS STATION

SEATING

AREA AND

CONNECTION TO

MISSION RD
CO
MIS

POTENTIAL RESTROOM PLAY AREA

LOCATION PEDESTRIAN
LIGHT, TYP.

PEDESTRIAN LIGHT

EXISTING TRAIL

TO REMIAN
DESIGN ALTERNATIVE 2

SEE BELOW RIGHT
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

NEW PLANTING, TYP.

DOG PARK
Figure 12 - Opportunity Area #3 showing skate space with community garden in the background.

Figure 13 - Preferred alternative for Opportunity Area #3.

NORTH
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 29
• A play area is desired near the
Sunshine Gardens neighborhood to the
east of Mission Road.
• There is potential for the play area to
be constructed within the Sunshine
Gardens neighborhood, and if that
happens, the dog park could expand
in size (see Alternative 2 on page 7 of
the preferred plan).
• Encourage development of pedestrian
access points between Mission Road
and the trail.
• There is support for a community
garden, and its location near the
northern trailhead could ease delivery
of garden materials.
• Another skate space will help disperse
that use throughout the entire trail.

Other Special Areas
The three opportunity areas offer the
greatest potential to enhance Centennial
Way, but there are other specific locations
where improvements could offer benefit.

West Orange Avenue Intersection
The current trail crossing at West Orange
Avenue consists of rectangular rapid
flashing beacons and in-ground lights at
the crosswalk. Safety could be improved
by adding advance yield pavement
markings (shark’s teeth), a raised, highvisibility crosswalk, and a flashing beacon with passive detection in addition to pushbutton detection.

The Spruce Avenue intersection is already
signalized, and upgrades to the Chestnut
Avenue intersection are planned as part
of the Community Civic Campus project.

Neither intersection needs additional
improvements.

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
0 20’ 40’ 80’

PLAYGROUND

OUTDOOR CLASSROOM

POLLINATOR GARDEN WITH

INTERPRETIVE PANELS
NEW PLANTING, TYP.

TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MAST
JULY 1, 2024

NEW SHRUB AND

GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP. (LOW

HEIGHT TO MAINTAIN

VISIBLITY AND NO
TREES)

PROPERTY
TYP.
12 FT. WI
ACCESS

FACILITIE
AGGREG
POROUS

EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

BENCH SEATING,
TYP.

LEA

LIGHTED PAT
BOLLARD, TYP.

LARGE STRUB
MASS, TYP.

FITNESS

STATION
WITH
BENCH

SEATING
PREFERRED PLAN 2 O
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP. EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
E
SCAPE

EXISTING

BENCH TO
REMAIN, TYP.

EXISTING SFPUC GROUNDWATER

FACILITIES TO REMAIN, PROVIDE
REQUIRED CLEARANCE, TYP.

LEARNING PATH

INTERPRETIVE
SIGN, TYP OF 4

EXISTING TREE TO
REMAIN, TYP.

SFPUC PROPERTY

BART PROPERTY

WIDEN EXISTING
TRAIL BY 3’

WHERE POSSIBLE

FITNESS

STATION

WITH BENCH

SEATING
0 20’ 40’ 80’

BART VENTILATION STRUCTURE

DRAINAGE AREA
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

NNECTION TO

SION RD

EXPANDED DOG PARK

LAWN AREA COMMUNITY
GARDEN

SKATE SPACE

FITNESS STATION
TRAIL

FITNESS STATION

SEATING

AREA AND

CONNECTION TO

MISSION RD

PEDESTRIAN
LIGHT, TYP.

PEDESTRIAN LIGHT

SKATE SPACE

EXISTING TR

TO REMIAN

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN

CROSSSWALK TO
REMAIN, TYP.

PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

NEW PLANTING, TYP.

NEW PLANTING
NEW TREE, TYP.

PROPRETY LINE,
TYP.

PREFERRED PLAN
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL M
JULY 1, 2024

LOS CERRITOS

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

PROPERTY LINE,
TYP.

OUTDOOR CLASSROOM,

AGGREGATE BASE WITH

LOG SEATING AND

BOULDERS
BE
SE

WIDEN EXISTING
TRAIL BY 3’

WHERE POSSIBLE

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB

ORANGE PARK

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN

NODE TO REMAIN
30 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
Dog Park Segment
The trail segment on the west side of the
existing dog park (pages 3 and 4 of the
preferred plan) would benefit from more
formalized neighborhood connections.

Informal foot paths have already been
created to connect B Street, 1st Street,
and A Street. Connections to these streets
could become paved and accessible.

An open area on the west side of the
trail adjacent to 12 Mile Creek is currently
underutilized and could be enhanced with
additional amenities.

BART Station Plaza
While not part of Centennial Way, a
plaza at the South San Francisco BART
station (page 8 of the preferred plan)
was identified in the BART maintenance
agreement as a location that the City
could enhance. Today the space is mostly
open and often inflicted by a strong wind
from the northwest.

The plaza could be improved by offering
seating on the north side, which could
be sheltered from the wind by planting
and vertical screening elements in the
landscape.

The SSF Farmer’s Market was at one time
located in the plaza. Improvements
should preserve the potential to allow for
farmer’s market booths, in case that use
is attempted again. A farmer’s market
in the plaza could enjoy better success
than past attempts, due to the newer
residential developments surrounding the
BART Station.

Additionally, plaza improvements should
explore other modifications to aid in the
programming of events, classes and
programs.

Colma Creek Restoration
During outreach there was a general
desire for greening or restoration of Colma
Creek. The city should continue to explore
opportunities with appropriate agencies.

General Recommendations
Based on site observations and comments
received during the outreach process, the
following recommendations apply to the
entire trail.
• Trail Width: The addition of amenities
along the trail in combination with new
land developments will likely increase
the number of trail users. The overall
trail width could be increased to 12
foot wide with 2-foot shoulders on each
side to handle the increased traffic and
allow for better maintenance access.

Site Photo - Trail intersection at W Orange Avenue.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 31

4. CONCEPT PLANS
PREFERRED PLAN 4 OF 8
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
JULY 1, 2024
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

SHOPPIN

PENINSULA PINES APARTMENTS

DOG PARK
12 MILE CREEK
1ST ST
A ST

EXISTING CONNECTION TO

SHOPPING CENTER
FITNESS STATION NEW PLANTING, TYP.

NEW TRAIL

CONNECTION

PEDESTRIAN
LIGHT, TYP.

EXISTING TRAIL
TO REMAIN, TYP.

EXISTING TREE TO
REMAIN, TYP.

NEW TRAIL

CONNECTION
NEW TREE, TYP.

SEATING AREA

LAWN AREA
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BART STATION

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

PARKING

SOUTH CITY STATION APARTMENTS

EL CAMINO REAL

SEATING AREA
NEW TREE, TYP.

NEW PLANTING, TYP.

AREA FOR FARMER’S

MARKET BOOTHS

BIKE RACK,
TYP.

BIKE

LOCKERS

EXISTING OVERHEAD

STRUCTURE TO REMAIN,
TYP.

LANDSCAPE SCREEN,
TYP. TO BLOCK WIND
Figure 15 - Design concept for the BART Station Plaza.

Figure 14 - Design concept for trail segment adjacent to the dog park.

Site Photo - BART Station Plaza.

NORTH
NORTH
32 CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
• Decomposed Granite: Decomposed
granite shoulders should be incorporated
along the trail to provide a space for
runners/joggers. For this application the
decomposed granite product should
contain an integral binder followed
up by a final application of binder
once the specified compaction is
achieved. For all other decomposed
granite applications, GraniteCrete or
approved equal is desired. The blend of
decomposed granite and cement in the
GraniteCrete product provides a firmer
surface while still retaining porosity.
• Bicycle/Pedestrian Signage: Concerns
about conflicts between bicycles (or
other wheeled transportation) and
pedestrians could be accomplished
by installing signage along the trail that
provide rules for separation between
transportation types and establish speed
limits. See Appendix F for regulatory
signage that was installed as part of
Opportunity Area 1. Signage can also
be developed that would be tied to
911 dispatch. A user in an emergency
situation could indicate a number or
code posted on the sign to 911 dispatch
which would give emergency responders
the exact location and access points.

This is similar to a program developed by
the City of San Jose for their trail network.
• Connections: More connections to
adjacent streets and neighborhoods
are desired to increase the number of
locations where the trail can be accessed.

Explore options for trail continuation
outside of the current trail corridor, and
consider working with other agencies to
extend the trail through their jurisdictions.
• Lighting/Security: Current light levels
at night along the trail are minimal and
a cause of safety concern by trail users.

New lights could be added between
the existing trail lights, or the existing light
Site Photo - Typical seat block at trail plaza.

Site Photo - Trail lighting at dusk, taken shortly after construction.

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 33
• Planting and Irrigation: New planting
along the trail should continue to utilize
drought tolerant, low maintenance
species that can tolerate recycled
water. Manicured lawns should be
limited to areas of concentrated use, in
order to reduce water and maintenance
requirements. Planting should be selected
to attract nesting birds and native
pollinators, which will help encourage
their movement throughout the city.

More shade trees and denser planting in
nature areas is desired by trail users. The
trail corridor provides an tremendous
opportunity for planting trees to meet the
goals set forth in the City’s Urban Forest
Master Plan.

The use of reclaimed water for irrigation
throughout the trail should continue to
expand, in order to utilize stormwater
that is captured and treated at Orange
Park. Existing trail irrigation systems have
recycled water provisions, and should
serve as a precedent for new systems.

Street crossings are the most difficult
barriers for extending the recycled water
infrastructure and should be considered
a high priority.
• Trail Maintenance: With additional
amenities and area to maintain within the
trail corridor, the number of city workers
dedicated to maintenance should follow
the standards described in the city wide
Parks and Recreation Master Pan.
• New Land Developments: Connections
between the trail corridor and new land
developments should be encouraged,
so that the trail becomes an attractive
feature. Access points are not limited
to where they are shown on the master
plan and should be explored wherever
feasible. Trail amenities should provide
diverse uses that are different than what
is offered by the developments and cater
to the needs of new users.
fixtures could be updated to increase
illumination. The new light fixtures should
match existing fixtures in style and height.

Additionally, the existing network of
security cameras could be expanded
throughout the trail and mounted to light
poles.
• Fitness Stations: Installing a series of
exercise stations along the entire length
of the trail at regular intervals is desired
by trail users. The exercise equipment
should be Greenfields Outdoor Fitness,
Signature Accessible Series.
• Skate Spaces: Smaller skate spaces
distributed throughout the entire length
of the trail are preferred over a larger
skate park. The skate spaces should be
constructed on concrete pavement and
have a mix of street-style obstacles and
ramps.
• Site Furnishings: New benches, bike
racks, and trash receptacles along the
trail should match existing. New seat
cubes, seat walls, and kiosks should follow
the theme already present at existing
trail plazas. Bike repair stations and
drinking fountains could be added at key
intersections where they are not already
present. If new interpretive panels are
added, consider making the text bilingual
in English and Spanish.
• Public Art and Signage: Opportunities
for public art along the entire trail should
be explored. Additionally, a coordinated
signage program should be developed to
include enhanced wayfinding signage,
millage markers, and interpretive signage.
• Public Restrooms: Explore opportunities
for on-trail restrooms in close proximity
to intersections for security and utility
connections. Use wayfinding signage
to highlight where public restrooms exist
adjacent to the trail.
05 IMPLEMENTATION
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 35

5. IMPLEMENTATION
Cost Estimate
To assist with implementation and
allocation of funding for improvements,
an estimate of probable construction
costs was prepared for the preferred
plan. The trail was divided between
street intersections, which isolated each
of the three opportunity areas. Segment
numbering does not indicate the priority for
constructing improvements. City funded
projects will prioritize improvements to
benefit disadvantaged communities. Dollar
figures are based on 2024 construction
costs and are expected to increase over
time due to inflation. When budgeting for
implementation, it is recommended to
add 6% inflation for every year after 2024.

The total estimated cost for each segment
is summarized below. A more detailed cost
breakdown for each sgement is provided
in Appendix E.

Funding Sources
Funding for improvements outlined in this
master plan would likely need to come from
a mix of local municipal sources, private
developers, and external grant applications.

Partnerships could be established with
developers of adjacent properties. This
could include getting credits for off-site open
space and/or increasing their floor-to-area
ratio (FAR) for developing sections of the trail.

Grant funding sources for the master plan
could include the Clean California Local
Grant program, or the California Land and
Water Conservation Fund program. As more
grant opportunities arise, they will be easier
to apply for now that desired improvements
have been defined and documented.

Segment Description Estimated Cost
1 Huntington Avenue to Spruce Avenue (restroom bldg. only) $521 Thousand 2 Spruce Avenue to West Orange Avenue $3.5 Million
3 West Orange Avenue to Chestnut Avenue $4.9 Million
4 Chestnut Avenue to McLellan Drive $13.9 Million
Total Estimated Cost $22.8 Million

EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL

HUNTINGTON
AVENUE

SPRUCE AVENUE
W. ORANGE
AVENUE

CHESTNUT
AVENUE

MCLELLAN
DRIVE
ORANGE

MEMORIAL
PARK

SAN BRUNO
BART

STATION

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION
NORTH

EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL

HUNTINGTON
AVENUE

SPRUCE AVENUE
W. ORANGE
AVENUE

CHESTNUT
AVENUE

MCLELLAN
DRIVE
ORANGE

MEMORIAL
PARK

SAN BRUNO
BART

STATION

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION
NORTH
SEGMENT 1
HUNTINGTON TO SPRUCE SPRUCE TO W.ORANGE
W.ORANGE TO

CHESTNUT
SEGMENT 2 SEGMENT 3 SEGMENT 4

CHESTNUT TO MCLELLAN
Figure 16 - Map showing trail segmentation in the cost estimates. 06 APPENDIX

APPENDIX A
Meeting Summaries
www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain Revised August 5, 2021
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: July 28, 2021
Time: 2:30 – 4:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Jacob Gilchrist, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Devin Stenhouse, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
Calwater
Ross Moilan, [email protected]
Mike Utz, [email protected]
Rob Seeley, [email protected]
Barbara Butler Artist-Builder
Barbara Butler, [email protected]
SummerHill Apartment Communities (988 El Camino Real)
Elaine Breeze (EB), [email protected]
L37 (1051 Mission)
Brian Baker, [email protected]
PMA/Lane Partners (Southline)
Sabrina Alonso, [email protected]
SyRes Properties (410 Noor)
Glen Ceridono, [email protected]
BART
Paul Voix, [email protected]
Town of Colma
Angelika Abellana, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 5, 2021

Page 2 of 5 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Opportunities and constraints plans for the Centennial Way Trail Master Plan and Orange Memorial Park Master Plan were presented during the meeting to facilitate feedback from stakeholder groups. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.

Item Action / Due Date

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL
The trail master plan is being updated in response to new areas within the trail corridor that are now available for constructing improvements and several adjacent developments that are either planned or under construction.

BART Comments

1. Any improvements along the trail corridor would need to be reviewed by BART, but in general improvements are likely acceptable as long as they don't impact the integrity of BART underground tunnels and infrastructure via footings, weight impacts, etc.
a. Secure areas must be excluded from study including vent structures and sub-stations. These areas are already fenced off.

2. The City could program the plaza at the South San Francisco BART station for events if desired.
a. There are precedents at Castro Valley, 24th Street, and 16th Street stations where farmer's market and artisan
events are held.
b. Additional security for events is sometimes a concern and may need to be paid for by the event organizers.

Developer Comments

3. The 410 Noor development will offer mostly studio and 1- bedroom apartments for rent, and the typical resident will likely be young and single.
a. Private on-site amenities include a gym, lounge,
entertainment room, and work from home space.
b. A community garden will be available to both residents and the public.
c. Desired off-site amenities include access to bike trails, a playground, and a place to take pets.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 5, 2021

Page 3 of 5 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date

4. The 1477 Huntington development will provide public access to Centennial Way from Huntington Avenue.

5. The 988 El Camino Real development (SummerHill) will likely rent to young adults, either singles or couples.
a. Private on-site amenities include retail space, a gym, club room, work from home space, hot-tub, BBQ, seating areas, bike parking, and a dog run.
b. A public outdoor fitness park will be constructed along the Centennial Way trail, and the Chestnut Avenue pedestrian crossing will be improved. EB to provide more information on the outdoor fitness park.

Already provided
c. Bike and scooter rental is not a part of the development plans. However, there are two public bike parking areas at the fitness park that might be able to accommodate bike or scooter rental if needed.
d. Desired off-site amenities include places to take pets, flexible spaces for lounging and playing games (i.e., grass mounds, open lawn areas, etc.), cornhole, concrete ping pong tables, basketball, and pickleball.

6. The 1051 Mission development is anticipated to house a mixed demographic of working singles and families. About 20% of the units will be affordable housing.
a. On-site amenities include a child care facility, retail space, outdoor plaza, parking area that can be programmed for
events (farmer's market, food truck, etc.), pedestrian/bike connections to El Camino Real and Mission Road, a
footbridge to Kaiser Hospital, playground, fitness court, and sculpture/lawn area.
b. The location of the footbridge to Kaiser has not been finalized and it could move farther north depending on
Kaiser's plans for redeveloping their campus.
c. Restoration of Colma Creek to a more natural channel will be explored, including softening up the concrete channel and restoring plant growth.
d. Desired off-site amenities include a dog park and bike share stations.

Town of Colma

7. Colma does not currently have plans for extending the trail north.

8. There are plans for bike lanes on El Camino Real which could extend south to the South San Francisco city limit.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 5, 2021

Page 4 of 5 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date

ORANGE PARK
Plans for a new pool building and the construction of new synthetic turf fields have prompted an update to the park master plan. The City also wants to evaluate what uses are working well and which ones might function better if changed.

Calwater Comments

9. Public access from Chestnut Avenue into Orange Park along the Colma Creek channel is desired by the City.

10. Access to Orange Park from Commercial Avenue through the City’s community gardens and Calwater property is another potential connection that may be beneficial.

11. Calwater’s treatment plant may expand to process
groundwater into drinking water, thus the groundwater area on the south side of the plant is important to protect.

12. There are several wells on the property that also need protection.

13. An underground water line that crosses under Colma Creek and runs north to the treatment plant must not be impacted.

14. Calwater is open to resuming discussions with the City on usage of their property for access to Orange Park.

Barbara Butler Comments

15. Barbara is exploring the possibility of renovating the existing artist studios at Orange Park.
a. Some of the buildings would be occupied by Barbara and her staff.
b. Other buildings could be used for classroom training and mentoring, or rented by other artists.
c. The studios could periodically be opened for public access and events.

16. The proposed renovation fits within the existing artist studios footprint, but additional space for parking would be desirable.

Other Comments

17. Eucalyptus Avenue could potentially provide a vehicular access to the park from Commercial Avenue if the gate was removed. Impacts to neighboring homes would need to be
evaluated first.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 5, 2021

Page 5 of 5 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date
Process and Next Steps

18. The outreach process has and will include other stakeholder groups and the larger community.

19. Stakeholders can fill out online surveys for both Orange Park and Centennial Way to provide further comments.

20. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.

The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.

Submitted by:

Nate Ritchie
CALA
cc: All attendees
Greg Mediati, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Adena Friedman, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Will McPhee, Overton Moore Properties (1477 Huntington), [email protected] Michael Johnson, Overton Moore Properties (1477 Huntington), [email protected] John Skerry, Kaiser Permanente, [email protected]
Makena Wong, County Flood and Sea Level Rise (OneShoreline), [email protected] Len Materman, County Flood and Sea Level Rise (OneShoreline), [email protected] Richard Mullane, Colma Creek Visioning Group, [email protected] Ann Mottola, San Bruno, [email protected]
Danielle Brewer, San Bruno, [email protected]
Attachments: Outreach Event Flyer and Survey Link, July 2021, one page Outreach Graphic Exhibits, July 2021, three pages
www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain August 16, 2021
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: August 10, 2021
Time: 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
South San Francisco Unified School District
Bill Savidge, [email protected]
Daina Lujan, [email protected]
Full of Fun Camp (Special Needs Group)
Herbert Rahm, [email protected]
SSF Parks and Recreation Commission
Bill Lock, [email protected]
Ruth DeNardi, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
Dania Castro, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholder groups an opportunity to provide feedback regarding amenities that they would like to see within Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park. The information collected will be considered during the preparation of master plan updates for the trail and park. A brief background of previous master planning efforts was presented along with current graphics illustrating opportunities and constraints. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021

Page 2 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg2.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date
School District Comments

1. SSF High School and Los Cerritos Elementary School are both adjacent to the trail and neither school is currently utilizing the trail to its full potential.
a. Student use of the trail is limited since the schools are fenced off and direct connections are not currently
provided.
b. Providing trail access to both schools may be beneficial to those who live locally within the neighborhood and do not drive to school.
c. If direct access was provided, gates would need to be implemented that restrict public access to school grounds.

2. Students commuting by bicycle to SSF High School might benefit from a better trail connection.
a. Bike parking could potentially be implemented nearby to encourage use.

3. The SSF High School track team could potentially use the trail for practice.

4. Fitness stations along the trail adjacent to SSF High School might be useful for PE classes and sport teams.

5. Safety at the Orange Avenue street crossing near Los Cerritos Elementary School could be improved.
a. Crosswalk markings are faded and should be repainted. b. A walking audit had been completed for the Safe Routes to School program which may have additional
recommendations.

City sent report to
CALA

6. A connection from the Los Cerritos Elementary School playground to the trail corridor could provide an opportunity for student activities such as nature walks or outdoor learning.

7. Community gardens adjacent to the schools might provide benefit, since there are few or no facilities within school grounds.

8. More trail lighting could improve student safety for those that use the trail early in the morning or after school events.

Full of Fun Camp Comments

9. Sensory play features and educational/interactive play elements could be assets for those with special needs.

10. Having a play structure with inclusive play and safety features is desirable.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021

Page 3 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg2.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date

11. If frisbee golf is implemented along the trail, smaller putting courses may be more suitable due to space constraints.

12. Picnic areas and restroom interiors at the park are outdated and could benefit from being renovated.

13. One concern with adding a shared bike/scooter program is users leaving the bikes/scooters in unauthorized locations. This has been a problem in the past.

Parks and Recreation Commission Comments

14. Adding a public play structure to the trail could be a good addition.

15. Providing emergency call boxes might make trail users feel safer.

16. The trail crossing at Chestnut Avenue and Antoinette Lane is difficult and safety is a concern.
a. Improvements are currently underway and should be
monitored for efficacy.

17. Screening trees or other physical barriers might protect the trail corridor from strong prevailing winds.

18. Joint use of the trail by bicyclists and pedestrians sometimes causes congestion and safety concerns.
a. Widening the dirt shoulder on both sides of the trail or widening the paved area could help alleviate congestion. b. Cyclist education could also help, either through
permanent signage or by periodically organizing pop-up
stations with bicycle safety educational materials.

Next Steps

19. Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group. Survey links are attached to the meeting summary.

20. Meeting participants can also provide feedback through the Agents of Discovery game using a smart phone. Instructions are attached to the meeting summary.

21. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021

Page 4 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg2.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.

Submitted by:

Nate Ritchie
CALA
cc: All attendees
Adena Friedman, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Shawnterra Moore, SSFUSD, [email protected]
David Hartman, Boys and Girls Club, [email protected] Nadia Rodriguez, Mothers Club, [email protected]
Alex Kolcek, Park Lane Apartments, [email protected] Henryk De-Rewenda, Community Garden, [email protected] Ethan Mizzi, Youth Advisory Council, [email protected] Edith Arias, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Dora Alvarez, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Elvira Valencia, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Martha Guzman, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Mary Ann Cruz, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Petra Lopez, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Andy Montenegro, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Norma Hernandez, Special Needs Group, [email protected] Christopher Espiritu, SSF BPAC, [email protected] Angela Duldulao, Cultural Arts Commission, [email protected] Marie Patea, SSF Friends of Parks and Recreation, [email protected] Kelli Jo Cullinan, SSF Friends of Parks and Recreation, [email protected] Attachments: Outreach Event Flyer and Survey Link, one page Agents of Discovery Game Flyer, one page
Outreach Graphic Exhibits, August 2021, three pages
www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain August 16, 2021
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: August 12, 2021
Time: 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale Jr., [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Brian Noce, [email protected]
Bill Stridbeck, [email protected]
Marcus Nava, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
SSF Parks and Recreation Commission
Ruth DeNardi, [email protected]
BMX Bicyclists
Jaxon Lazzari, [email protected]
Aquatic Group
Khai Vu, [email protected]
Rosalind Stewart, [email protected]
Skateboarders
Paul DeMartini (PDM), [email protected]
Ryan Motzek, [email protected]
Chris Kraft, [email protected]
Bocce Ball Group
Kay McGough, [email protected]
Softball/Baseball Leagues
Juan Bustos, [email protected]
Woody Rael, [email protected]
Jim Elder, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021

Page 2 of 5 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg3.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
Dania Castro, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholder groups an opportunity to provide feedback regarding amenities that they would like to see within Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park. The information collected will be considered during the preparation of master plan updates for the trail and park. A brief background of previous master planning efforts was presented along with current graphics illustrating opportunities and constraints. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.

Item Action / Due Date
Softball/Baseball Leagues

1. After the synthetic turf fields at Orange Park are completed, the number of fields available to softball/baseball leagues throughout the city should meet current needs but may not accommodate future league growth.
a. This assumes continued use of school facilities for league play, not just city facilities.

2. There is some concern about the use of school facilities. a. It can be more difficult for the city leagues to obtain access for practices and games at some school sites,
particularly Parkway Heights field.
b. Maintenance of the school fields seems to be less
consistent than city-maintained facilities. There are
sometimes problems with irrigation scheduling.

3. There are concerns with allowing dogs to use baseball/softball fields and dog owners not cleaning up after their pets. a. Consider prohibiting dogs on fields used for league play.

4. After the synthetic turf fields at Orange Park are completed, baseball and soccer will be competing for use of the same facility, so careful coordination between the leagues will be necessary.

5. There is some concern that city maintenance resources will be occupied maintaining the new synthetic turf fields at Orange Park and other natural turf facilities might not be maintained as well as they are today.

6. The new synthetic turf fields should be designed with multiple base path lengths (60’ and 70’), so they can accommodate more than one age group.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021

Page 3 of 5 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg3.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date
BMX Bicyclists

7. A bike pump track within Orange Park could be beneficial, as there currently isn’t a track locally.
a. A petition has been organized that shows support for a pump track facility within the city.

8. Good examples of BMX facilities include McLaren Bike Park in San Francisco, Santa Clara PAL.

Skateboarders

9. The existing skatepark within Orange Park doesn’t match the desires of many users.
a. The existing asphalt pavement is rough and the modular metal ramps are not ideal for most skaters.
b. A mix of transition style skateboarding (ramps), bowls, and street style skateboarding elements would likely be more popular. Integrating the different styles is a more modern approach to building a skatepark.

10. Having skateable elements that feel inclusive within the overall park (“skate spaces”) are more desirable than a fenced-off area.
a. Examples of skate spaces include Oculus Park in
Burlingame and urban plazas in general.
b. Other good skatepark examples include designs by Spohn Ranch, skateparks in Barcelona Spain, and Mayfair
Skatepark in San Jose.

11. A petition was organized that showed support for improving the current skatepark.

12. The Transition Project skate group conducted a survey of members that may provide insights on local skateboarder preferences.

PDM provided
survey results

13. Providing skate features along Centennial Trail that are off the main path could be another alternative to a concentrated park.
a. It would be important for the skate spaces to have
enough separation so they don’t conflict with pedestrians and cyclists.

Aquatic Group

14. If a new pool building is constructed in Orange Park, the existing pool facility should remain open during construction because there is a high demand for its use and its consistent staff presence is an asset for park users.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021

Page 4 of 5 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg3.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date

15. If a new pool building is constructed, the existing building could be repurposed for another use, such as a gymnasium or community hall.

16. Any new pool should be larger than the existing pool to better accommodate the high usage.
a. Ideally there would be two pools, one to accommodate swim classes and older use groups and a separate pool for lap swimmers.
b. A pool facility with more capacity could allow local swim teams to use the pool for swim meets.

Bocce Ball Group

17. The current facility consists of four outdoor courts and two covered courts.

18. The current courts are fully utilized and should not be reduced or removed.

19. It can be difficult to schedule league use of the courts for play, practice, and tournaments because of the requirement to maintain the courts for public use during certain times. a. It would be helpful if there was a mechanism for locking the courts during times when they are reserved for league use.

20. On the four uncovered courts, overhead shade at the end of the court where the ball is thrown would be beneficial to protect players from the sun during warm months.

21. The exiting bocce facility could benefit from a multi-use space adjacent to the courts that would allow for larger events to take place.

Next Steps

22. Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group. Survey links are attached to the meeting summary.

23. Meeting participants can also provide feedback through the Agents of Discovery game using a smart phone. Instructions are attached to the meeting summary.

24. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
August 16, 2021

Page 5 of 5 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg3.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.

Submitted by:

Nate Ritchie
CALA
cc: All attendees
Adena Friedman, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Patty Gomez, Soccer League, [email protected]
Brian Mansell, Soccer League, [email protected]
Mike Pizzo, Soccer League, [email protected]
Troy & Dana Hartman, Aquatic Group, [email protected] Amanda Leigh, Pickleball Group, [email protected]
Kurtis Wong, Pickleball Group, [email protected]
Mike Redondo, Tennis Group, [email protected]
Anthony Dizon-Barron, Tennis Group, [email protected] Stanley Chi, Tennis Group, [email protected]
Alex Khoo, Tennis Group, [email protected]
Lily Oweyeung, Tennis Group, [email protected]
Devin Stenhouse, Outdoor Fitness Group, [email protected] Joanne Calvert, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Jeannette Holt, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Chitra Dhingra, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Diane Zellmer, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Ron Malone, Seniors Group, [email protected]
Parker Holloway, Skateboarders, [email protected]
Attachments: Outreach Event Flyer and Survey Link, one page Agents of Discovery Game Flyer, one page
Outreach Graphic Exhibits, August 2021, three pages
www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain August 24, 2021
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
Date: August 19, 2021
Time: 10:00 – 11:00 am
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
Brandon Cutajar, [email protected]
Kelli Jo Cullinan, [email protected]
Kari Jung, [email protected]
Zachary Kust, [email protected]
Catherine Misener, [email protected]
Kimberly Morrison, [email protected]
Laura Armanino, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Brian Noce, [email protected]
Erin O'Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Ercie Santos, [email protected]
Devin Stenhouse, [email protected]
Brian Crume, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give City staff an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plans. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.

Item
Centennial Trail Comments

1. The annual Fun Run could potentially utilize the trail or another similar running event could be programmed on the trail.

2. If the trail had more access points it might better serve as an alternative mode of transportation to events at Orange Park and could be promoted as such.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
August 24, 2021

Page 2 of 3 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg4.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item

3. A small (U8) soccer field off of the trail could reduce demand on the new multi-use synthetic turf field at Orange Park if it had associated parking.

4. Interactive art elements along the trail such as outdoor musical instruments could create opportunities for public performances.

5. Story walks for children could be held along the trail if there were small gathering areas.

6. More access points along the trail should accompany amenities that are added.

7. Exercise equipment along the trail could accommodate walking or agility training classes.
a. Equipment should be adaptable for use by seniors and those of all abilities. b. Classes could travel between different exercise stations and also educate users on how to use the equipment properly.
c. Sunset Blvd in San Francisco is an example of dispersed exercise stations.

Orange Park Comments

8. Picnic areas and shelters get high use so they should not be removed.

9. The Pickleball community would like to see permanent courts.

10. Artist studios could be adapted to host artist in residence, gallery showings, or community working rooms (for example a wood shop with tools that can be used by the public once they have been through training classes). a. Studios could be open to special needs groups during specific times.

11. Unprogrammed field space is important for unstructured play.

12. Community gardens could become a valuable asset as more apartment housing is developed.

13. When programming the Mazzanti property, consider how it would interact with the Calwater property if it becomes available in the future.

14. Currently the Mazzanti property is used to hold landscape materials. Adding material bays for compost, infield fines, wood chips, etc. is desired.

15. A plant nursery space might be an asset for the city and could host a volunteer program.

16. The potential park expansion area on the south side of Colma Creek shown on the Opportunities & Constraints Plan is not currently reserved for any specific type of use.

17. An outdoor theater could be incorporated with the artist studios for performing arts.

18. A garage or satellite corp. yard to store City maintenance equipment and trucks would be helpful since the need for equipment storage is expected to increase and the artist studios are currently used for storage.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
August 24, 2021

Page 3 of 3 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg4.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item

19. Childcare, sports, the historical society and other groups currently store supplies in the artist studios and will need another building for storage if the studios are redeveloped.

20. It was discussed to potentially shrink the main parking lot, but its current size and location is likely well utilized as is and shouldn't be changed. a. The parking lot could be beautified by adding larger canopy trees or other landscape.

21. Access across the Calwater property could improve circulation throughout the park, either from Commercial Avenue through the community garden or from Chestnut Avenue along Colma Creek.

22. A bridge across Colma Creek connecting the two potential expansion areas could be helpful.

Outreach Suggestions

23. Good locations to collect user feedback include the pool building at Orange Park, Fernekes Building, Magnolia Center, and City Hall.

24. In addition to distributing surveys, preliminary design alternatives could be displayed at locations throughout the city to collect feedback.

25. More engagement with Kaiser might be useful to find out what amenities hospital staff would like to see.

26. Provide an announcement in the next senior newsletter about upcoming meetings.

Next Steps

27. Online surveys are available for staff to complete. Survey links are provided below:
a. Orange Park: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/OrangeMemorialParkStaff b. Centennial Trail: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CentennialWayTrailStaff

28. Staff can suggest events and locations that could be used for further public outreach. Suggestions for additional stakeholder groups are also welcome.

The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.

Submitted by:

Nate Ritchie
CALA
cc: All attendees
Attachments: Outreach Graphic Exhibits, August 2021, three pages

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
October 26, 2021 Sustain
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting #5
Date: October 14, 2021
Time: 3:00 – 4:30 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Adenda Friedman, [email protected]
Nell Selander, [email protected]
Calwater
Ross Moilan, [email protected]
Mike Utz, [email protected]
L37 (1051 Mission)
Brian Baker, [email protected]
Overton Moore Properties (1477 Huntington)
Will McPhee, [email protected]
San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise District
Makena Wong, [email protected]
Colma Creek Visioning Group
Richard Mullane, [email protected]
BART
Paul Voix, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Dania Castro, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholders an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plan alternatives.

The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 26, 2021

Page 2 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg5.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL

1. Providing tree canopies wherever possible along the trail is highly encouraged.

Opportunity Area #1

2. Connectivity/access points from residential buildings to the trail should be considered. Alternative #1 proposes a better
connection from the property to the trail.

3. Developer for 1477 Huntington suggested that parking would make sense in this area. Parking in this location will continue to be studied as there are space constraints. While not shown in either alternative, parking was discussed closer to West Orange. Parking would require coordination and approval from the PUC.

4. Developer for 1477 Huntington liked both alternatives, however Alternative #1 was preferred most.

Opportunity Area #3

5. Makena Wong suggests looking at opportunities to soften the edges of Colma Creek without compromising the flood
protection. Additional studies would be required.

6. Opportunity Area #3 has some space to soften the edges of the creek along the entire span.
a. This span of the creek is a low flow area and with the trail at a much higher elevation than the creek.
b. Any accessibility into the creek would most likely eat into park space.
c. Terracing the creek would have to be considered to
provide access to the creek. Opportunities to integrate terracing into a park element such as an amphitheater
could be considered.
d. Meandering the trail would provide opportunities to soften the edge of the creek.

7. The developer of L37 noted that during their outreach, dog runs were highly desired, but could not be placed on the L37 development site, so a dog run nearby would be valuable.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 26, 2021

Page 3 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg5.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date

ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK

8. The idea of detention of Colma Creek flows in the park was a point of contention during previous community outreach
efforts. Richard Mullane suggested that the bike pump track & skate park location was a great opportunity for detention.

9. Cisterns that are currently being placed underneath new ballfields are focused for water quality and not flood
mitigation.

10. Calwater doesn’t have concern with using their land for flood mitigation as long as it does not impact their water quality or existing water wells. More studies and approvals would be required to move forward in this direction.

11. Calwater doesn’t see a problem with providing an asphalt trail along the existing maintenance road to provide park access from Chestnut Ave. Only concern they have is if a physical structure was built that would prohibit them from accessing their underground tanks for maintenance

12. Calwater recommends providing a written request for intended park improvements. This will help facilitate
communication between the City and Calwater.

13. Calwater isn’t aware of any future development plans on their property.

14. Makena Wong and Richard Mullane preferred Alternative #1

15. The connection from the trail on North Canal St to the park is currently difficult. Consider looking at improving the
connection across Orange Ave.

Process and Next Steps

16. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.

The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 26, 2021

Page 4 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg5.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Submitted by:

Zach Katz
Zach Katz
CALA
cc: All attendees
Devin Stenhouse, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Jacob Gilchrist, City of South San Francisco, [email protected] Barbara Butler, [email protected]
Elaine Breeze (EB), Summerhill Apartment Communities, [email protected] Rob Seeley, Cal Water [email protected]
Sabrina Alonso, PMA/Lane Partners, [email protected]
Glen Ceridono, SyRes Properties, [email protected] Angelika Abellana, Town of Colma, [email protected] Michael Johnson, Overton Moore Properties (1477 Huntington), [email protected] John Skerry, Kaiser Permanente, [email protected]
Len Materman, County Flood and Sea Level Rise (OneShoreline), [email protected] Ann Mottola, San Bruno, [email protected]
Danielle Brewer, San Bruno, [email protected]
Attachments: Survey Link, one page
Presentation materials, 27 pages

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
October 29, 2021 Sustain
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: October 20, 2021
Time: 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
South San Francisco Unified School District
Bill Savidge, [email protected]
Daina Lujan, [email protected]
Wazi Chowdhurry, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Zach Katz, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholders an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plan alternatives.

The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.

Item Action / Due Date
School District Comments

1. Providing more nature into the centennial trail corridor would be beneficial to the schools

2. The outdoor classroom is very appealing and exciting.

3. The access shown to the tennis courts would provide a good bike connection to the school.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021

Page 2 of 3 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg6.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date

4. The connection at the end of the football stadium is a is harder to get to for students. This connection could benefit from bike parking which the school would be in charge of providing within the grounds to encourage use.

5. The district is currently updating their master plan with a focus on school security.
a. The district and City along with their respective design teams should have a meeting to confirm access to school sites and discuss the district’s goals and the City’s
development goals.

District to set up a
meeting between
City and District

6. Community gardens adjacent to the schools would be of interest to the school district.

7. More trail lighting could improve student safety for those that use the trail early in the morning or after school events.

Process and Next Steps
Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group.

Survey links are attached to the meeting summary. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.

The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.

Submitted by:

Zach Katz
Zach Katz
CALA
cc: All attendees
Adena Friedman, [email protected]
Shawnterra Moore, [email protected]
David Hartman, [email protected]
Nadia Rodriguez, [email protected]
Alex Kolcek, [email protected]
Henryk De-Rewenda, [email protected]
Ethan Mizzi, [email protected]
Edith Arias, [email protected]
Dora Alvarez, [email protected]
Elvira Valencia, [email protected]
Martha Guzman, [email protected]
Mary Ann Cruz, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021

Page 3 of 3 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg6.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Petra Lopez, [email protected]
Andy Montenegro, [email protected]
Norma Hernandez, [email protected]
Christopher Espiritu, [email protected]
Marie Patea, [email protected]
Kelli Jo Cullinan, [email protected]
Herbert Rahm, [email protected]
Bill Lock, [email protected]
Ruth DeNardi, [email protected]
Attachments: Survey Link, one page
Meeting Presentation, 20 pages

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
October 29, 2021 Sustain
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
Date: October 21, 2021
Time: 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Philip Vitale Jr., [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Erin O’Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Bill Stridbeck, [email protected]
Aquatic Group
Khai Vu, [email protected]
Rosalind Stewart, [email protected]
Skateboarders
Mike Manidis, [email protected]
Ryan Motzek, [email protected]
Derick Stevenson, [email protected]
Patrick Beaudouin
Softball/Baseball Leagues
Juan Bustos, [email protected]
Woody Rael, [email protected]
Soccer
Brian Mansell, [email protected]
Patty Gomez, [email protected]
Pickleball
Armando Leigh, [email protected]
Kurtis Wong, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021

Page 2 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg7.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

The purpose of the meeting was to give stakeholders an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plan alternatives.

The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.

Item Action / Due Date
General

1. Stakeholders like the diversity of amenities proposed and appreciate that they serve users of all generations and ages.

Pickleball Group

2. Thinks it would be good to have each Centennial trail opportunity area be themed such as “Health and Wellness”, “Science and Tech”, etc.

3. Crossing Chestnut from the trail is currently difficult. The City confirmed upgrades to the crossing are currently under
construction.

4. Pickleball has seen a large growth of users (multigenerational) over the past 5-10 years.

5. Appreciate incorporating dedicated pickleball courts into the OMP design but 2-3 courts are probably not enough for the expected users.

6. Consider providing at a minimum 6 courts which is how many courts Leo Ryan Park in Foster City currently has.

Skateboarder Group

7. The stakeholder groups likes and appreciate all of the proposed skateparks and skate spaces, although the
concept having skateable elements that feel inclusive within the overall park and Centennial Trail (“skate spaces”) are more desirable than a fenced-off area.
a. The current trend is moving away from larger skate parks to permanent simplistic skate spaces that mimic
urban/street infrastructure that skateboarders generally gravitate towards.

8. The idea of blending in permanent multi-purpose skate space elements into the landscape/design of the park or trail is very desirable.

9. Lighting at any new skate feature is desired and encouraged.

Aquatic Group

10. The City encouraged group to attend the special city council session regarding the OMP pool on Tuesday, the 26th.

City to provide
details to aquatics
group.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021

Page 3 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg7.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item Action / Due Date

11. Likes the idea of a community garden and greenhouse and encourages providing raised beds in the garden.

Soccer Group

12. The preferred OMP alternative is #2.

13. Having more fields will alleviate scheduling conflicts of the multi-purposes fields under construction.

14. It’s preferred that all new fields are lit since there is not much daylight time for practice after normal work hours.

15. Group is in support of skateparks around the City for youth.

Next Steps

16. Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group. Survey links are attached to the meeting summary.

17. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.

The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.

Submitted by:

Zach Katz
Zach Katz
CALA
cc: All attendees
Adena Friedman, [email protected]
Marcus Nava, [email protected]
Brian Noce, [email protected]
Ruth DeNardi, [email protected]
Jaxon Lazzari, [email protected]
Chris Kraft, [email protected]
Kay McGough, [email protected]
Mike Pizzo, [email protected]
Jim Elder, [email protected]
Troy & Dana Hartman, [email protected]
Amanda Leigh, [email protected]
Mike Redondo, [email protected]
Anthony Dizon-Barron, [email protected]
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: Stakeholder Meeting
October 29, 2021

Page 4 of 4 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg7.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Stanley Chi, [email protected]
Alex Khoo, [email protected]
Lily Oweyeung, [email protected]
Joanne Calvert, [email protected]
Jeannette Holt, [email protected]
Chitra Dhingra, [email protected]
Diane Zellmer, [email protected]
Ron Malone, [email protected]
Parker Holloway, [email protected]
Attachments: Survey Link, one page
Meeting Presentation, 20 pages

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
October 20, 2021 Sustain
Meeting Summary
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
Date: October 20, 2021
Time: 10:00 – 11:00 am
Attendees: City of South San Francisco (City)
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Philip Vitale, [email protected]
Angela Duldulao, [email protected]
Brandon Cutajar, [email protected]
Kelli Jo Cullinan, [email protected]
Kari Jung, [email protected]
Zachary Kust, [email protected]
Catherine Misener, [email protected]
Kimberly Morrison, [email protected]
Laura Armanino, [email protected]
Mike Mulkerrins, [email protected]
Brian Noce, [email protected]
Erin O'Brien, [email protected]
Joshua Richardson, [email protected]
Ercie Santos, [email protected]
Devin Stenhouse, [email protected]
Brian Crume, [email protected]
Veronica Ortiz, [email protected]
Sharon Ranals, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA)
Zach Katz, [email protected]
Brian Fletcher, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to give City staff an opportunity to provide initial feedback for the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park master plan alternatives. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting.

Item
Centennial Trail Comments

1. Make sure that trail elements are accessible to all ages and abilities, i.e. Fitness equipment similar to Sunset Blvd and elevated community garden plots.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
October 21, 2021

Page 2 of 3 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg8.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item

2. The City is exploring bringing recycled water down to Centennial Trail.

3. It’s difficult to maneuver maintenance trucks on the trail. Consider locating trash enclosures/trash receptacles in close proximity to the trail for ease of maintenance.

4. The City would like to run the alternatives by the fire department to confirm what type of access and if a turnaround is required.

5. Alternative #1 for opportunity area 2 is the preference for high school and City classes.

6. Consider interchangeable interpretive/educational signage along the entire span of the trail for educational purposes.

7. There have been discussions about continuing Sequoia lane through the trail and across the creek. Consider adjusting the location of the community garden and other potential amenities east so they don’t get displaced by Sequoia Lane.

8. Restroom locations should be considered as more amenities are being implemented. Ideally there are restroom every ½ a mile for users.

9. Opportunity area #3 feels more open and potentially has more eyes on it. Consider locating the skatepark and pump track in this area if space permits.

10. There are graffiti issues closer to San Bruno Station. Consider adding cameras and providing more connections to allow for more access to the site.

11. The City is contemplating if a bikeshare/scooter program would be beneficial along the trail.

12. Consider showing the PG&E easement on the plans.

Orange Park Comments

13. Childcare services require storage space. The City is currently looking into storage for childcare services at the Orange Park Library as the primary location

14. Picnic areas and shelters get high use so they should not be removed.

15. It’s preferred to keep any maintenance facility separate from public spaces/amenities.

16. Picnic areas are generally fully booked. Look at adding more picnic areas where space allows.

17. The market/event walk is a flexible space and can utilized for picnic area.

18. Consider showing U-9 soccer field striping on the un-programmed turf area. This area will most likely be utilized for soccer.

19. Cultural arts prefers alternative #1 and would like to see the artist studio remain.

There currently is demand for the artist studios.

Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update RE: City Staff Stakeholder Meeting
October 21, 2021

Page 3 of 3 ends

21021_SUM_StakeholderMtg8.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item

20. The currently proposed alternatives are preliminary. Amenities and locations can be mixed and matched depending on the outreach data received throughout the process.

21. A further discussion item is the possibility of using a portion of the Cal Water property connecting the community garden to the Mazzanti property.

Next Steps

22. Meeting participants are encouraged to fill out the online surveys for each project and share the surveys with members of their group. Survey links are attached to the meeting summary. Stakeholders will be asked to provide more input as the master plans continue to develop.

The information above is CALA’s understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. CALA is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If corrections are requested, a revised summary will be issued.

Submitted by:

Zach Katz
Zach Katz
CALA
cc: All attendees

Attachments: Survey Link, one page

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
June 11, 2024
Meeting Summary
SFPUC Coordination Meeting
RE: Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
Date: May 30, 2024
Time: 1:00 – 12:00 p.m.

Attendees: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC):

Heather Rodgers, [email protected]
Emily Read, [email protected]
City of South San Francisco (City):

Josh Richardson, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA):

Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
The purpose of the meeting was to introduce the master plan project to the SFPUC and understand site restrictions and the SFPUC approval process for updates to the master plan.

Item
Responsible
Party & Due Date

1. The project site currently has SFPUC groundwater test wells. Based on Google aerial imagery, it appears that there are six wells. The SFPUC will provide a map that shows the locations of the existing wells.

SFPUC by 6/19

2. The site is being considered for future permanent SFPUC groundwater facilities and potentially a support building. The permanent wells would be bigger than the test wells and would have associated underground pipelines. The location of the future facilities and pipelines is unknown.
a. The SFPUC will find out if there is any additional information about these planned facilities and provide it to the design team.

SFPUC by 6/19
b. Any information that is provided about future planned facilities should be omitted from plans shown to the public.

CALA/City

3. New improvements that are installed by the City may need to be removed in the future if they conflict with future SFPUC groundwater facilities.

4. Typically, improvements that are within 50 feet of a groundwater well or pipeline can only extend 6 inches max below grade.

Meeting Summary
SFPUC Coordination Meeting
RE: Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
June 11, 2024

Page 2 of 3 ends

21041B_SUM_SFPUCMeeting.docx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item
Responsible
Party & Due Date
a. Since the locations of future wells and pipelines on the project site are still unknown, improvements shown on the trail master plan should assume the 6-inch depth restriction throughout the entire site within SFPUC property.

CALA by draft
master plan

5. Acceptable improvements within SFPUC property include pathways and pavements, surface mounted furnishings, and all landscaping except trees. Furnishings must be easily removable (surface mounted).

CALA by draft
master plan

6. The SFPUC will provide examples of improvements that have been approved at other similarly restricted sites (rocks, planting, and paths, etc.)
SFPUC by 6/19

7. Existing improvements that have already been installed with footings deeper than 6 inches don't necessarily need to be removed. The SFPUC will confirm.

SFPUC by 6/19

8. Drivable paths to existing test wells may provide benefit. The SFPUC will indicate if this is desired.

SFPUC by 6/19

9. BART property doesn't have the same SFPUC restrictions.

Improvements on BART property should be approved by BART.

CALA/City

10. The limits of SFPUC property should be clearly labeled in the master plan.

CALA by draft
master plan
a. The SFPUC will send available property information that indicates the limits of SFPUC property.

SFPUC by 6/19

11. The proposed design should be presented at one SFPUC Project Review meeting. Other reviews will be performed by the SFPUC Real Estate Services.
a. CALA will coordinate with the SFPUC on the appropriate Project Review meeting date.

CALA by 6/14

12. The SFPUC will prepare a consent letter to issue a no-fee license agreement to the City, which will grant the City the ability to install improvements on SFPUC property with certain restrictions. The agreement will need SFPUC Commission approval, which could potentially happen at the August/September Commission meeting.

The Commission will approve the license only, and approval of the master plan will be provided separately by SFPUC Real Estate Services.

SFPUC
Meeting Summary
SFPUC Coordination Meeting
RE: Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
June 11, 2024

Page 3 of 3 ends

21041B_SUM_SFPUCMeeting.docx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Item
Responsible
Party & Due Date
a. SFPUC approval of the master plan is separate from license agreement approval. SFPUC Real Estate Services can approve the master plan after there is a license agreement approved by the SFPUC Commission.

13. Because this will be a no-fee license agreement, an interpretive sign with educational content related to SFPUC services (where water comes from, etc.) should be installed on the site.
a. The location of the sign will be noted in the master plan, and the sign content will be developed later when a separate project is identified to construct improvements.

CALA by draft
master plan

14. The SFPUC has requested the following items: (1) as-built information for currently installed path lighting and video cameras, (2) written consent to install the lighting, and (3) PG&E easement information within the project site.

CALA/City by
6/14
The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached during the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding.

Submitted by:

Nate Ritchie
Callander Associates

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
August 22. 2024
Meeting Summary
SFPUC Coordination Meeting
RE: Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
Date: August 22, 2024
Time: 1:00 – 2:00 p.m.

Attendees: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC):

Heather Rodgers, [email protected]
Emily Read, [email protected]
City of South San Francisco (City):

Philip Vitale, Jr., [email protected]
Josh Richardson, [email protected]
Greg Mediati, [email protected]
Callander Associates (CALA):

Nate Ritchie, [email protected]
Meeting Notes

1. Locate fitness stations close to the edge of SFPUC property.

2. Surface mount fitness stations so that excavation does not exceed 6-inch depth.

3. In general, remove program elements that are not typically associated with trail use.

4. Existing benches can remain or be relocated. It would be good if the number of proposed benches equals the number of existing benches.

5. Shift SFPUC interpretive sign towards edge of SFPUC property.

6. Realign secondary path so it intersects the main trail closer to SFPUC property edges.

7. Locate outdoor classroom and skate space outside of SFPUC property.

8. Obtain permission from BART for all improvements on their property.

APPENDIX B
Survey Results Summaries
www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 14 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
September 3, 2021
Round 1 Public Outreach Data Summary
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
Number of survey responses
• Public responses = 167, City staff responses = 1
Most popular amenities based on sticker votes

1. More lighting at night

2. Community garden

3. Fitness stations

4. Playground

5. Bicycle pump track

6. Another dog park

7. Nature areas

8. Picnic areas

9. Skatepark
Most popular amenities based on survey results

1. More lighting at night

2. Nature areas

3. Community garden

4. Picnic areas

5. Fitness station

6. Lawn area

7. Playground

8. Public art

9. Bicycle pump track
Most popular amenities and improvements based on hand written notes during events • Trees for shade and wind block
• More nature areas
• Gathering spaces / seating
• Fitness stations along trail
• Soccer fields with lighting and restrooms
Round 1 Public Outreach Data Summary
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
September 3, 2021

Page 2 ends

21041_OutreachDataSummary_Round1.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Summary of survey results
• Most people live less than 10 minutes from the trail and use the trail once a week or less • Most people use the trail for recreation rather than commuting to a destination.

Walking/running is more popular than cycling.
• What people like most: connections to surrounding amenities, walking away from cars, nature, flat walking surface
• How the trail can be improved: Landscaping, lighting, security/police patrol, trash receptacles and dog bags
• Most people think there are enough access points to get on and off the trail.

Sticker Votes - Round 1 Outreach Events
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
August 17, 2021
Activit
y Po
p-U
p Event #1 Po
p-U
p Event #2 O
pen House #1 Total
More lighting at night 16 22 14 52Community garden 4 22 13 39Fitness station 7 17 13 37Playground 7 21 9 37Bicycle pump track 8 7 16 31Another dog park 1 18 7 26Nature areas 4 12 10 26Picnic areas 3 11 10 24Skatepark 4 5 11 20Pickleball 2 7 3 12Soccer field 4 7 0 11Frisbee golf 2 4 5 11Lawn areas 0 5 6 11Shared mobility 2 7 2 11Trail Public Art — — 9 9Interpretive Signage 2 2 2 6Other Water fountains Community garden with ADA compliance
—
BathroomsWater fountainsShade treesSecurity cameras
21021_MATRIX_InspirationImageStickerVotes.xls

Page 1 of 1 ends

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
August 17, 2021
Written Public Comments – Round 1 Outreach Events
Centennial Way Trail & Orange Memorial Park Master Plan Update Pop-Up Event #1
Date: 7/16/2021
Orange Park Comments

1. The picnic shelter should stay in the park. Kids summer camp is located there.

2. Add an expanded pool/water park.

Centennial Trail Comments

1. Improve trail access across Chestnut to make it safer.

2. Respect Los Cerritos Elementary School and don’t add high use activities around it.

3. If a skatepark is added to the trail, put it near the edges and street intersections so skaters are not encouraged to ride on the trail to get to it.

Pop-Up Event #2
Date: 7/20/2021
Orange Park Comments

1. Replace furnishings that have rusty metal.

2. More dog bags and more enforcement of dogs off leash.

3. More trash cans and recycling bins.

4. Organize more free events.

5. Softer play area surfacing similar to play area at City Hall.

6. Provide more security at parks.

7. Organize more (monthly) game and fun events.

8. Organize more indoor activities during cold weather.

9. New basketball courts are desired.

10. Don’t close the existing pool during renovations.

11. The new pool should be the same size or larger than the existing pool.

Outreach Summary
Orange Park/Centennial Trail
August 17, 2021

Page 2 of 3 ends

21021_SUM_OutreachEventsComments.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Centennial Trail Comments

1. Restore benches in the dog park with no backs. They were replaced and the replacements are not as good.

2. Add more seating in the dog park.

3. Provide more shade along the trail.

4. Replace the drinking fountain at the dog park so it’s similar to Buri Buri Park.

5. The walking path around the edge of the dog park is great.

6. Provide more open spaces for people to gather.

7. Provide more crosswalks at Chestnut/Mission.

8. More trees along the trail.

9. Encourage users to take better care of facilities.

10. More nature, drought tolerant landscaping.

11. Try to preserve views of the hills in relation to surrounding development.

12. Provide more “nature reserve” like areas.

13. Provide pedestrian connection to Kaiser for employees.

14. Add crossing beacons to street crossings.

Open House #1
Date: 8/14/2021
Orange Park Comments

1. 3rd and Army in San Francisco is a good example of a skateboard area.

2. Need for 4-9 age group soccer field for when multi-purpose field is busy.

3. Can basketball courts be use for soccer/multi-purpose use?

4. Lighting for fall use.

5. Integrated art studio that is fully accessible.

6. Would be nice to have a road connecting two sides over Colma Creek.

7. Test 1 or 2 pickleball courts before adding more. Put pilot on existing tennis courts to see how well they are used.

8. Rental fees for picnic and facilities are too high.

9. Ensure new improvements are for all abilities.

10. Would be nice to have a play area that is different than the norm.

11. Retain artist studios.

12. Eternal flame sculpture has been duplicated elsewhere, remove from Orange Park.

13. Wi-Fi hot spots.

Centennial Trail Comments

1. Bicycle connections to schools are important.

2. A café near BART would be popular.

3. Put the farmers market under a shelter so it can be open year-round.

4. Add more trees and flowers (natural areas).

5. Add trees to block wind

6. Naturalize Colma Creek.

7. Remove hiding areas.

8. More amenities would deter homeless.

9. Another dog park by Civic Center new development.

10. Block wind at picnic areas.

Outreach Summary
Orange Park/Centennial Trail
August 17, 2021

Page 3 of 3 ends

21021_SUM_OutreachEventsComments.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

11. Multiple fitness stations as nodes along the trail.

12. Bilingual interpretive signage.

13. More directional signage indicating where amenities are along trail.

14. More seating areas.

15. No dog park near the hospital – too loud for patients.

16. Provide vehicle access and bathrooms at Opportunity Area #1.

17. Increase safety at Chestnut crossing and make traffic lights turn faster.

18. All-inclusive playground.

19. Nature areas that include sound, scent, and touch for people of all abilities to enjoy.

20. Interpretive signs with braille.

21. All sensory art.

22. Easy wheelchair and walker access.

23. Lots of exercise stations along trail that are durable.

24. Landscape boulders.

25. Low water use landscape.

26. Security cameras.

27. Place BMX pump track near an intersection in case kids are injured and need an ambulance.

28. Try pickleball at the park first.

29. Skate park and bike park on the trail might cause too much congestion if it encourages more bikes or skaters to ride on the trail.

30. Add blue emergency call boxes.

31. Add consistent fencing along the north side of Opportunity Area #2. Allow local businesses sponsor parts of the fence and display murals.

32. Add native gardens.

33. Add soccer fields with lighting for fall season.

34. Add Futsal either indoor or outdoor (indoor preferred).

35. US Youth Soccer is the league standard.
www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 14 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
November 15, 2021
Round 2 Public Outreach Data Summary
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
Number of Survey Responses = 72
Demographics
• Roughly 80% of responders have not attended previous meetings related to the master planning process.
• 49% of responders live less than a 10 minutes’ walk away from the trail, 23% live 10-20 minutes away, and 22% live more than 20 minutes away.
• 42% visit the trail once a week, 22% visit once a month, 14% visit once a day, and 6% visit once a year.

Opportunity Area #1 Summary
• There is strong support for both soccer fields and the bike pump track/skate park uses. • There is concern about how to access a soccer field at this location. • If a bike pump track and skate park are implemented here, other amenities should cater to different user groups.
• A larger playground, more lawn area, and fitness stations are popular activities. • Larger fitness courts are preferred over smaller fitness stations. • Opportunities for shaded seating adjacent to amenities was suggested. • The addition of restrooms was suggested.

Opportunity Area #2 Summary
• There is support for the bike pump track and skate park next to the school because those activities are often popular with adolescents.
• The idea of more nature area and green space is desired. Nature areas should include shade.
• The outdoor classroom is well supported both for use by students and also for organized community events.
• Larger fitness courts are preferred over smaller fitness stations. • The addition of restrooms was suggested.

Opportunity Area #3 Summary
• The community garden is the most popular use.
• The dog park is desirable if parking is made available at the BART Station. • There is some concern about having too many skate spaces. • There is a need for closer trail access across Mission Road to the Sunshine Gardens neighborhood.
• The addition of a play structure could be an asset to Sunshine Gardens.

Round 2 Public Outreach Data Summary
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan Update
November 15, 2021

Page 2 ends

21041_OutreachDataSummary_Round2.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Uses That Could Happen at Either Site
• There is significant interest in having a bike pump track and skate park. However, there is not a strong preference for where those uses are located (either at Orange Park or along Centennial Trail).
• There is a strong preference for locating soccer fields at Orange Park instead of Centennial Trail. Most people responded that if a soccer field was constructed along Centennial Trail at Opportunity Area 1, they would either need to park nearby or else they wouldn't know how to access it.

APPENDIX C
Design Alternatives

APPENDIX D
Preferred Concept Plan
PREFERRED PLAN 1 OF 8
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
OCTOBER 10, 2022

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.
0 20’ 40’ 80’

BART VENTILATION

STRUCTURE

SAN BRUNO BART

STATION

SOUTHLINE DEVELOPMENT
(FUTURE OFFICE / COMMERCIAL)

BIKE PUMP TRACK
(BID ALTERNATIVE)
1477 HUNTINGTON
(FUTURE RESIDENTIAL)

MAPLE AVE

HUNTINGTON AVE

SOUTHLINE AVE (FUTURE)

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

CITY OF SAN BRUNO

CITY OF SAN BRUNO

CITY OF SAN BRUNO

CITY OF SAN BRUNO CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

ALIGNMENT FOR NEW MAPLE AVENUE TRAIL CONNECTION
POTENTIAL ACCESS TO 1477 HUNTINGTON
NEW TREE, TYP.

INFORMAL SPORTS PRACTICE FIELD

PLAYGROUND

TEMPORARY HYDROSEED

SKATE SPACE FITNESS STATION

PICNIC/ SEATING AREAOUTDOOR CLASSROOM
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP.

POLLINATOR GARDEN WITH INTERPRETIVE PANELS
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP.

SEATING AREA
EXISTING TRAIL TO REMAIN, TYP.

NEW PLANTING, TYP.

LAWN AREA

PUBLIC ACCESS TO HUNTINGTON AVENUE
NOTE: REFER TO APPENDIX G FOR AN UPDATED PLAN THAT SHOWS THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE CONSTRUCTED IN THE ABOVE AREA IN 2024.

TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP

SSF HIGH SCHOOL

NATIVE LANDSCAPE AREA
EXISTING BENCH TO REMAIN, TYP.

EXISTING SFPUC GROUNDWATER FACILITIES TO REMAIN, PROVIDE REQUIRED CLEARANCE, TYP.

LEARNING PATH INTERPRETIVE SIGN, TYP OF 4
NEW SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING, TYP. (LOW HEIGHT TO MAINTAIN VISIBLITY AND NO TREES) PROPERTY LINE, TYP.
12 FT. WIDE VEHICULAR ACCESS TO GROUNDWATER FACILITIES, TYP. EITHER AGGREGATE OR GRASS POROUS PAVING

SECONDARY NATURE TRAIL
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP.

EXISTING TRAIL TO REMAIN, TYP.

BENCH SEATING, TYP.

LEARNING
LIGHTED PATHBOLLARD, TYP.

LARGE STRUB MASS, TYP.

SFPUC PROPERTYBART PROPERTY

FITNESS STATION WITH BENCH SEATING

INTERPRETIVE SIGN WITH SFPUC EDUCATIONAL CONTENT
WIDEN EXISTING TRAIL BY 3’ WHERE POSSIBLE

FITNESS STATION WITH BENCH SEATING
PREFERRED PLAN 2 OF 8
0 20’ 40’ 80’
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

BART VENTILATION STRUCTURE

SPRUCE AVE

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN NODE AND CROSSWALK TO REMAIN
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP. EXISTING TRAIL TO
REMAIN, TYP.

BART STRUCTURE

POTENTIAL RESTROOM LOCATION

EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA
NOTE: PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS PAGE WERE UPDATED IN 2024 BASED ON COORDINATION WITH THE SFPUC.

PREFERRED PLAN 3 OF 8
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
0 20’ 40’ 80’

LOS CERRITOS

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

WEST ORANGE AVE

LOS CERRITOS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
EXISTING TRAIL TO REMAIN, TYP.SKATE SPACE
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

EXISTING LIGHT TO REMAIN, TYP.

OUTDOOR CLASSROOM, AGGREGATE BASE WITH LOG SEATING AND BOULDERS

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN NODE WITH ENHANCED STREET CROSSING

BENCH SEATING

SFPUC PROPERTY

EXISTING SFPUC GROUNDWATER FACILITIES TO REMAIN, PROVIDE REQUIRED CLEARANCE

BART PROPERTY
12 FT. WIDE VEHICULAR ACCESS TO GROUNDWATER FACILITIES, TYP. EITHER AGGREGATE OR GRASS POROUS PAVING WIDEN EXISTING TRAIL BY 3’ WHERE POSSIBLE

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB

BART VENTILATION

STRUCTURE
B ST

ORANGE PARK
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP.

NEW TRAIL CONNECTION

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN NODE TO REMAIN

EXISTING ORANGE PARK CONNECTION
NEW PLANTING, TYP.

EXISTING TRAIL CONNECTION

DOG PARK
NOTE: PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE TOP PLAN VIEW ON THIS PAGE WERE UPDATED IN 2024 BASED ON COORDINATION WITH THE SFPUC.

PREFERRED PLAN 4 OF 8
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
OCTOBER 10, 2022

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
0 20’ 40’ 80’
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

NINE 88 APARTMENTS
(NEW RESIDENTIAL)

SHOPPING CENTER PENINSULA PINES APARTMENTS

DOG PARK
12 MILE CREEK

EL CAMINO REAL

CHESTNUT AVE
1ST ST A ST

EXISTING CONNECTION TO SHOPPING CENTER

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN NODE AND CROSSWALK TO REMAIN
FITNESS STATION NEW PLANTING, TYP.

NEW TRAIL CONNECTION
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP.EXISTING TRAIL TO REMAIN, TYP.EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP.

NEW TRAIL CONNECTION
NEW TREE, TYP.SEATING AREA

LAWN AREA

PUBLIC FITNESS PARK
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

PREFERRED PLAN 5 OF 8
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
OCTOBER 10, 2022

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
0 20’ 40’ 80’

NEW POLICE STATION

LIBRARY, PARKS & RECREATION,

AND COMMUNITY THEATER/

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

NEW COMMUNITY CIVIC CAMPUS
1051 MISSION RD DEVELOPMENT
(FUTURE MIXED USE)

MISSION RD

BART STRUCTURE

EL CAMINO REAL

ANTOINETTE LANE

COLMA CREEK

CHESTNUT AVE

EXISTING TRAIL TO REMAIN

PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION

EXISTING TRAIL CONNECTION TO REMAIN
PREFERRED PLAN 6 OF 8
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
OCTOBER 10, 2022

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
0 20’ 40’ 80’
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

B

FUTURE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, STAIR AND RAMP TO KAISER

MISSION RD GRAND AVE

KAISER HOSPITAL
1051 MISSION RD DEVELOPMENT
(FUTURE MIXED USE)

COLMA CREEK
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, TYP.FITNESS STATIONNEW TREE, TYP.

PICNIC/ SEATING AREA

EXISTING TRAIL TO REMAIN

FUTURE FITNESS COURT
FUTURE PLAYGROUNDNEW PLANTING, TYP.

PROPERTY LINE, TYP.

PREFERRED PLAN 7 OF 8
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
OCTOBER 10, 2022
0 20’ 40’ 80’

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP
PG&E EASEMENT, TYP.

MISSION RD

SEQUOIA
LN

COLMA CREEK

MISSION RD

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BART STATION COLMA CREEK

FITNESS STATION

SEATING AREA AND CONNECTION TO MISSION RD

CONNECTION TO MISSION RD

EXPANDED DOG PARK

POTENTIAL RESTROOM PLAY AREALOCATION PEDESTRIAN
LIGHT, TYP.

LAWN AREA COMMUNITY
GARDEN

SKATE SPACE

PEDESTRIAN LIGHT

SKATE SPACE

EXISTING TRAIL TO REMIAN
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSSWALK TO REMAIN, TYP.

DESIGN ALTERNATIVE 2 SEE BELOW RIGHT
ALTERNATIVE 2 PLAN
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.NEW PLANTING, TYP.

DOG PARK

FITNESS STATION
NEW PLANTINGNEW TREE, TYP.

PROPRETY LINE, TYP.

EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP.

EXISTING TRAIL TO REMAIN
0 20’ 40’ 80’
PREFERRED PLAN 8 OF 8
TRAIL

CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL MASTER PLAN
OCTOBER 10, 2022

SAN BRUNO

BART STATION SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

HIGH SCHOOL
ORANGE
PARK

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

KEY MAP

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BART STATION

SOUTH SAN

FRANCISCO

BART STATION

PARKING

SOUTH CITY STATION APARTMENTS

MISSION RD

EL CAMINO REAL

MCLELLAN DR
SEATING AREANEW TREE, TYP.NEW PLANTING, TYP.AREA FOR FARMER’S MARKET BOOTHS BIKE RACK, TYP.BIKE LOCKERS

EXISTING TRAIL TO REMAIN
EXISTING OVERHEAD STRUCTURE TO REMAIN, TYP.LANDSCAPE SCREEN, TYP. TO BLOCK WIND

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimates
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization Allow 8% 30,440.00 $ 30,440.00 $

2. Construction staking Allow LS 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $

3. Temporary fencing 300 LF 6.00 $ 1,800.00 $

4. Stormwater pollution prevention Allow LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 $ $ 42,240
B. Restroom Building

1. Demolition and site preparation Allow LS 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $

2. Restroom building Allow LS 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $

3. Electrical service Allow LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $

4. Domestic water meter 1 EA $ 20,000.00 20,000.00 $

5. Domestic water line 300 LF $ 75.00 22,500.00 $

6. Sanitary sewer connection 300 LF $ 150.00 45,000.00 $

7. Cleanouts and valves 3 EA $ 1,000.00 3,000.00 $

8. Pavement access 200 SF $ 16.00 3,200.00 $
$ 368,700
C. $ 410,940
D. Professional Services

1. Geotechnical report Allow LS 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $

2. Construction Management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close-out)
Allow 8% 32,880.00 $ 32,880.00 $

3. Services (special inspections & testing) Allow 1% 4,110.00 $ 4,110.00 $

4. Permits/Fees (Calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
Allow 3% 12,330.00 $ 12,330.00 $

5. Construction documents Allow 10% 41,090.00 $ 41,090.00 $

6. Construction administration Allow 2.5% 10,270.00 $ 10,270.00 $

7. Miscellaneous Allow 1% 4,110.00 $ 4,110.00 $
$ 109,790
E. $ 520,730
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS – SEGMENT ONE
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occur between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

Segment One - Huntington Ave to Spruce Ave
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Plan", dated 9/10/24 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS – SEGMENT ONE
Note: This cost estimate is for the construction of a restroom building within Segment One.

Refer to Appendix G for improvements in Segment One that have already been constructed.
21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization Allow 8% 159,140.00 $ 159,140.00 $

2. Construction staking Allow LS 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $

3. Temporary fencing 2,900 LF 6.00 $ 17,400.00 $

4. Stormwater pollution prevention Allow LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ $ 211,540
B. Demolition

1. Clearing and grubbing 171,030 SF 0.50 $ 85,515.00 $

2. Miscellaneous demolition Allow LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ $ 110,520
C. Grading and Drainage

1. Rough grading (6" ave. depth) 1,080 CY $ 40.00 43,200.00 $

2. Connect to existing storm drain system 1 EA $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 $

3. Catch basin 3 EA $ 3,500.00 10,500.00 $

4. Storm drainline 800 LF $ 80.00 64,000.00 $

5. Bioretention area (4% of impervious
pavement)
2,170 SF $ 25.00 54,250.00 $
$ 176,950
D. Site Construction

1. Widen main trail (2' additional asphalt) 2,580 LF 16.00 $ 41,280.00 $

2. 2' shoulder on widened side of main trail 2,580 LF 12.00 $ 30,960.00 $

3. Slurry seal (existing main trail) 30,960 SF 1.00 $ 30,960.00 $

4. Trail pavement markings 2,580 LF 4.00 $ 10,320.00 $

5. Asphalt pavement 10,890 SF 8.00 $ 87,120.00 $

6. Concrete pavement 3,800 SF 16.00 $ 60,800.00 $

7. Concrete stairs 150 SF 24.00 $ 3,600.00 $

8. Decomposed granite pavement 5,435 SF 6.00 $ 32,610.00 $

9. Fitness station concrete pavement 620 SF 16.00 $ 9,920.00 $ $ 307,570
E. Site Furnishings

1. Bench 3 EA 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $

2. Trash receptacle 2 EA 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $

3. Fitness station equipment 2 EA 10,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $

4. Interpretive panel 4 EA 5,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $

5. Skate space ramps and obstacles Allow LS 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $

6. Outdoor classroom seating Allow LS 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

7. Regulatory sign 4 EA 750.00 $ 3,000.00 $
$ 323,000
F. Lighting and Electrical

1. Connect to existing electrical service 1 EA 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $

2. Bollards 20 EA 4,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $

3. Conduit and conductors 1,500 LF 60.00 $ 90,000.00 $
$ 190,000
G. Irrigation

1. Controller assembly 1 EA 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Two - Spruce Ave to Orange Ave
21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 2 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Two - Spruce Ave to Orange Ave

2. Extend electrical service 1 EA 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $

3. Water point of connection 1 EA 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $

4. Water meter 1 EA 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

5. Backflow preventer 1 EA 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $

6. Flow sensor 1 EA 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $

7. Master valve 1 EA 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $

8. Mainline piping 1,950 LF 12.00 $ 23,400.00 $

9. Valve (remote control, gate, quick coupling) 15 EA 800.00 $ 12,000.00 $

10. Spray Irrigation 103,700 SF 2.00 $ 207,400.00 $
$ 282,700
H. Landscape Soil Preparation

1. Amendment incorporation and fine grading 103,700 SF 0.75 $ 77,775.00 $ $ 77,780
I. Planting

1. Shrubs and groundcover (high intensity) 3,500 SF 6.00 $ 21,000.00 $

2. Shrubs and groundcover (low intensity) 103,700 SF 3.00 $ 311,100.00 $

3. Mulch 107,200 SF 1.00 $ 107,200.00 $

4. Hydroseed 76,600 SF 0.30 $ 22,980.00 $
$ 462,280
J. Landscape Maintenance

1. 90 day maintenance period 3 MO 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ $ 6,000
K. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 2,148,340
L. Contingencies

1. Design contingency Allow 15% 322,250.00 $ 322,250.00 $

2. Bid contingency Allow 10% 214,830.00 $ 214,830.00 $

3. Inflation Allow 6% 128,900.00 $ 128,900.00 $
$ 665,980
M. TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS – SEGMENT TWO $ 2,814,320 21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 3 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Two - Spruce Ave to Orange Ave
N. Professional Services

1. Construction Management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close-out)
Allow 8% 225,150.00 $ 225,150.00 $

2. Studies (topo, geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
Allow 12% 337,720.00 $ 337,720.00 $

3. Services (special inspections & testing) Allow 1% 28,140.00 $ 28,140.00 $

4. Permits/Fees (Calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
Allow 3% 84,430.00 $ 84,430.00 $

5. Preliminary design and public outreach

6. Design development Allow 2.5% - $ - $

7. Construction documents Allow 10% - $ - $

8. Construction administration Allow 2.5% - $ - $

9. Miscellaneous Allow 1% - $ - $
$ 675,440
O. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS – SEGMENT TWO $ 3,489,760 Based on drawing titled "Preferred Plan", dated 9/10/24 The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occur between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.
(completed with master plan)
21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 4 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization Allow 8% 66,580.00 $ 66,580.00 $

2. Construction staking Allow LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $

3. Temporary fencing 2,380 LF 6.00 $ 14,280.00 $

4. Stormwater pollution prevention Allow LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ $ 125,860
B. Demolition

1. Clearing and grubbing 21,665 SF 0.50 $ 10,832.50 $

2. Miscellaneous demolition Allow LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ $ 35,830
C. Grading and Drainage

1. Rough grading (6" ave. depth) 400 CY $ 80.00 32,000.00 $

2. Connect to existing storm drain system 1 EA $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 $

3. Catch basin 2 EA $ 3,500.00 7,000.00 $

4. Storm drainline 225 LF $ 80.00 18,000.00 $
$ 62,000
D. Site Construction

1. Widen main trail (2' additional asphalt) 1,000 LF 16.00 $ 16,000.00 $

2. 2' shoulder on widened side of main trail 1,000 LF 12.00 $ 12,000.00 $

3. Slurry seal main trail 12,000 SF 1.00 $ 12,000.00 $

4. Trail pavement markings 1,000 LF 4.00 $ 4,000.00 $

5. Asphalt pavement 2,360 SF 8.00 $ 18,880.00 $

6. Concrete pavement 1,135 SF 16.00 $ 18,160.00 $

7. Fitness station concrete pavement 265 SF 16.00 $ 4,240.00 $

8. Stairs and ramp concrete pavement 730 SF 24.00 $ 17,520.00 $

9. Handrail 85 LF 120.00 $ 10,200.00 $

10. Orange Ave intersection improvements Allow LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ $ 163,000
E. Site Furnishings

1. Bench 2 EA 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

2. Picnic Table 2 EA 7,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $

3. Trash receptacle 4 EA 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $

4. Fitness station equipment 1 EA 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ $ 45,000
F. Lighting and Electrical

1. Connect to existing electrical service 1 EA 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $

2. Pathway light 4 EA 12,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $

3. Conduit and conductors 2,325 LF 60.00 $ 139,500.00 $ $ 207,500
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Three - Orange Ave to Chestnut Ave
21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 5 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Three - Orange Ave to Chestnut Ave
G. Irrigation

1. Controller assembly 1 EA 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $

2. Extend electrical service 1 EA 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $

3. Water point of connection 1 EA 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $

4. Water meter 1 EA 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

5. Backflow preventer 1 EA 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $

6. Flow sensor 1 EA 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $

7. Master valve 1 EA 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $

8. Mainline piping 110 LF 12.00 $ 1,320.00 $

9. Valve (remote control, gate, quick coupling) 10 EA 800.00 $ 8,000.00 $

10. Spray Irrigation 23,225 SF 2.00 $ 46,450.00 $

11. Rotor Irrigation 6,390 SF 1.50 $ 9,585.00 $
$ 105,260
H. Landscape Soil Preparation

1. Amendment incorporation and fine grading 29,615 SF 0.75 $ 22,211.25 $ $ 22,210
I. Planting

1. Trees (24" box) 6 EA 450.00 $ 2,700.00 $

2. Shrubs and groundcover (high intensity) 8,065 SF 6.00 $ 48,390.00 $

3. Shrubs and groundcover (low intensity) 15,160 SF 3.00 $ 45,480.00 $

4. Mulch 23,225 SF 1.00 $ 23,225.00 $

5. Turf from sod 6,390 SF 1.00 $ 6,390.00 $
$ 126,190
J. Landscape Maintenance

1. 90 day maintenance period 3 MO 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ $ 6,000
K. Area Renovations

1. Renovate existing areas of the trail that are
not improved as part of the master plan
48,500 SF 35.00 $ 1,697,500.00 $
$ 1,697,500
L. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 2,596,350
M. Contingencies

1. Design contingency Allow 20% 519,270.00 $ 519,270.00 $

2. Bid contingency Allow 10% 259,640.00 $ 259,640.00 $

3. Inflation Allow 6% 155,780.00 $ 155,780.00 $
$ 934,690
N. TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS – SEGMENT THREE $ 3,531,040 21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 6 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Three - Orange Ave to Chestnut Ave
O. Professional Services

1. Construction Management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close-out)
Allow 8% 282,480.00 $ 282,480.00 $

2. Studies (topo, geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
Allow 12% 423,720.00 $ 423,720.00 $

3. Services (special inspections & testing) Allow 1% 35,310.00 $ 35,310.00 $

4. Permits/Fees (Calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
Allow 3% 105,930.00 $ 105,930.00 $

5. Preliminary design and public outreach

6. Design development Allow 2.5% 88,280.00 $ 88,280.00 $

7. Construction documents Allow 10% 353,100.00 $ 353,100.00 $

8. Construction administration Allow 2.5% 88,280.00 $ 88,280.00 $

9. Miscellaneous Allow 1% 35,310.00 $ 35,310.00 $
$ 1,412,410
P. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS – SEGMENT THREE $ 4,943,450 Based on drawing titled "Preferred Plan", dated 10/10/22 The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occur between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices. (completed with master plan)
21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 7 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization Allow 8% 425,830.00 $ 425,830.00 $

2. Construction staking Allow LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $

3. Temporary fencing 2,780 LF 6.00 $ 16,680.00 $

4. Stormwater pollution prevention Allow LS 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ $ 487,510
B. Demolition

1. Clearing and grubbing 152,000 SF 0.50 $ 76,000.00 $

2. Miscellaneous demolition Allow LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $

3. Pavement removal 950 SF 5.00 $ 4,750.00 $

4. Seatwall removal 120 LF 100.00 $ 12,000.00 $
$ 117,750
C. Grading and Drainage

1. Rough grading (6" ave. depth) 2,815 CY $ 80.00 225,200.00 $

2. Community garden soil 170 CY $ 120.00 20,400.00 $

3. Connect to existing storm drain system 3 EA $ 5,000.00 15,000.00 $

4. Catch basin 7 EA $ 3,500.00 24,500.00 $

5. Storm drainline 1,650 LF $ 80.00 132,000.00 $

6. Biotreatment areas (4% of impervious
pavement)
1,230 SF $ 45.00 55,350.00 $

7. Synthetic turf drainage system 9,300 SF $ 3.00 27,900.00 $ $ 500,350
D. Site Construction

1. Widen main trail (2' additional asphalt) 1,800 LF 16.00 $ 28,800.00 $

2. 2' shoulder on widened side of main trail 1,800 LF 12.00 $ 21,600.00 $

3. Slurry seal main trail 21,600 SF 1.00 $ 21,600.00 $

4. Trail pavement markings 1,800 LF 4.00 $ 7,200.00 $

5. Asphalt pavement 8,085 SF 8.00 $ 64,680.00 $

6. Concrete pavement 18,200 SF 16.00 $ 291,200.00 $

7. Decomposed granite pavement 2,000 SF 6.00 $ 12,000.00 $

8. Fitness station concrete pavement 2,600 SF 16.00 $ 41,600.00 $

9. Play area rubber surfacing 6,220 SF 35.00 $ 217,700.00 $

10. Dog park synthetic turf 9,300 SF 12.00 $ 111,600.00 $

11. Community garden plot edging 570 LF 25.00 $ 14,250.00 $

12. Seatwall 145 LF 350.00 $ 50,750.00 $

13. Fencing and gates (play area, dog park,
community garden)
1,465 LF 150.00 $ 219,750.00 $

14. Landscape screen fence 135 LF 175.00 $ 23,625.00 $
$ 1,126,360
E. Site Furnishings

1. Bench 16 EA 5,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $

2. Picnic Table 10 EA 7,500.00 $ 75,000.00 $

3. Trash receptacle 5 EA 2,500.00 $ 12,500.00 $

4. Pet waste station 2 EA 750.00 $ 1,500.00 $

5. Bike rack 3 EA 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $

6. Bike repair station 1 EA 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Four - Chestnut Ave McLellan Dr
21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 8 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Four - Chestnut Ave McLellan Dr

7. Fitness station equipment 4 EA 10,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $

8. Shade structure 6 EA 100,000.00 $ 600,000.00 $

9. Play equipment Allow LS 600,000.00 $ 600,000.00 $

10. Skate space ramps and obstacles Allow LS 450,000.00 $ 450,000.00 $

11. Dog park furnishings Allow LS 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $

12. Regulatory sign 5 EA 750.00 $ 3,750.00 $

13. Wayfinding sign 5 EA 1,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $

14. Informational kiosk 1 EA 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $

15. Restroom building and utilities Allow LS 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ $ 2,418,750
F. Lighting and Electrical

1. Connect to existing electrical service 1 EA 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $

2. Pathway light 12 EA 12,000.00 $ 144,000.00 $

3. Conduit and conductors 1,930 LF 60.00 $ 115,800.00 $ $ 279,800
G. Irrigation

1. Controller assembly 1 EA 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $

2. Extend electrical service 1 EA 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $

3. Water point of connection 1 EA 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $

4. Water meter 1 EA 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

5. Backflow preventer 1 EA 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $

6. Flow sensor 1 EA 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $

7. Master valve 1 EA 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $

8. Mainline piping 1,085 LF 12.00 $ 13,020.00 $

9. Valve (remote control, gate, quick coupling) 20 EA 800.00 $ 16,000.00 $

10. Spray Irrigation 94,755 SF 2.00 $ 189,510.00 $

11. Rotor Irrigation 8,505 SF 1.50 $ 12,757.50 $
$ 271,190
H. Landscape Soil Preparation

1. Amendment incorporation and fine grading 103,260 SF 0.75 $ 77,445.00 $ $ 77,450
I. Planting

1. Trees (24" box) 93 EA 450.00 $ 41,850.00 $

2. Shrubs and groundcover (high intensity) 10,875 SF 6.00 $ 65,250.00 $

3. Shrubs and groundcover (low intensity) 83,880 SF 3.00 $ 251,640.00 $

4. Mulch 94,755 SF 1.00 $ 94,755.00 $

5. Turf from sod 8,505 SF 1.00 $ 8,505.00 $
$ 462,000
21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 9 of 10
prepared for the
City of South San Francisco
prepared on: 10/30/24
prepared by: AD
checked by: NR/SS
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Centennial Way Trail Master Plan
Segment Four - Chestnut Ave McLellan Dr
J. Landscape Maintenance

1. 90 day maintenance period 3 MO 2,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ $ 7,500
K. Area Renovations

1. Renovate existing areas of the trail that are
not improved as part of the master plan
44,600 SF 35.00 $ 1,561,000.00 $
$ 1,561,000
L. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 7,309,660
M. Contingencies

1. Design contingency Allow 20% 1,461,930.00 $ 1,461,930.00 $

2. Bid contingency Allow 10% 730,970.00 $ 730,970.00 $

3. Inflation Allow 6% 438,580.00 $ 438,580.00 $
$ 2,631,480
N. $ 9,941,140
O. Professional Services

1. Construction Management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close-out)
Allow 8% 795,290.00 $ 795,290.00 $

2. Studies (topo, geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
Allow 12% 1,192,940.00 $ 1,192,940.00 $

3. Services (special inspections & testing) Allow 1% 99,410.00 $ 99,410.00 $

4. Permits/Fees (Calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
Allow 3% 298,230.00 $ 298,230.00 $

5. Preliminary design and public outreach

6. Design development Allow 2.5% 248,530.00 $ 248,530.00 $

7. Construction documents Allow 10% 994,110.00 $ 994,110.00 $

8. Construction administration Allow 2.5% 248,530.00 $ 248,530.00 $

9. Miscellaneous Allow 1% 99,410.00 $ 99,410.00 $
$ 3,976,450
P. $ 13,917,590
Q.

1. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS – SEGMENT FOUR
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Plan", dated 10/10/22 The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occur between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS – SEGMENT FOUR
(completed with master plan)
Pedestrian bridge to Kaiser hospital

EXCLUSIONS
21041B_EST.xlsx
© copyrighted 2024 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 10 of 10

APPENDIX F
Regulatory Signage
Regulatory Signage 1
Segment 1 Trail Signage
This appendix documents the additional trail signage that was installed as part of the improvements that were constructed in 2024 between Huntington Avenue and Spruce Avenue. It is not intended to be a comprehensive trail signage program, but instead provides a precedent in terms of language, color, and graphic style that should be matched on all future signage installed along the trail.

Regulatory Signage 2
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 12” x 20”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer

4. Unless otherwise specified on plan,
locate sign 10’ before intersection or end
of trail. Sign may be grouped with other
regulatory signs as applicable.

Color Palette:

Brown (C-56, M-59, Y-72, K-48)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)
Trail Rules Sign
Letter type 1:

Font: Arial
Size: 88 pt
All Caps
Letter type 3:

Font: Arial Bold
Size: 52 pt
All Caps
Letter type 2:

Font: Arial
Size: 52 pt
All Caps
Letter type 4:

Font: Arial
Size: 50 pt
All Caps
Regulatory Signage 3
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 12” x 18”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer

4. Unless otherwise specified on plan,
locate sign 10’ before intersection or end
of trail. Sign may be grouped with other
regulatory signs as applicable.

Color Palette:

Brown (C-56, M-59, Y-72, K-48)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)
Nature Play Area Rules Sign
Letter type 1:

Font: Arial
Size: 110 pt
All Caps
Letter type 2:

Font: Arial
Size: 78 pt
All Caps
Regulatory Signage 4
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 18” x 12”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer

4. Unless otherwise specified on plan,
locate sign 10’ before intersection or end
of trail. Sign may be grouped with other
regulatory signs as applicable.

Color Palette:

Dark Brown (C-49, M-63, Y-72, K-47)
Light Brown (C-18, M-84, Y-91, K-7)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)
Callout When Passing Sign
Letter:

Font: Tahoma Bold
Size: 110 pt
All Caps
Regulatory Signage 5
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 18” x 12”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer

4. Unless otherwise specified on plan,
locate sign 10’ before intersection or end
of trail. Sign may be grouped with other
regulatory signs as applicable.

Color Palette:

Dark Brown (C-49, M-63, Y-72, K-47)
Light Brown (C-18, M-84, Y-91, K-7)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)
Speed Limit Sign
Letter:

Font: Tahoma Bold
Size: 120 pt
All Caps
Letter:

Font: Tahoma Bold
Size: 260 pt
All Caps
Regulatory Signage 6
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 18” x 12”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer

4. Unless otherwise specified on plan,
locate sign 10’ before intersection or end
of trail. Sign may be grouped with other
regulatory signs as applicable.

Color Palette:

Dark Brown (C-49, M-63, Y-72, K-47)
Light Brown (C-18, M-84, Y-91, K-7)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)
Bike Yield to Peds Sign
Letter:

Font: Tahoma Bold
Size: 130 pt
All Caps
Regulatory Signage 7
General Park Rules Sign

1. Park curfew - 9:00 p.m. No Loitering.

2. No alcohol allowed.

3. Smoking prohibited in City parks.

4. Dogs must be on leash (maximum 6ft long).

5. Owners are responsible for cleaning up after their dog.

6. Please walk bicycles.

7. Damages or defacement of public property is a
misdemeanor.

8. No motorized vehicles or electric bikes.

9. Skateboarding and skating permitted only in designated areas.

10. No portable BBQ grills permitted.

Report any damage or hazardous conditions to the
City of South San Francisco Parks Division at (650) 829-3837 Section # 10.36 SSF Municipal Code

PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS
DRUGS
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 18” x 24”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer
Color Palette:

Brown (C-56, M-59, Y-72, K-48)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)
Regulatory Signage 8
• Helmets are required; knee and elbow pads are recommended. • Children 14 years and under must be supervised by an adult. • Bicycles, skateboards, and scooters are allowed.
• No steel pegs, electric bikes, or motorized vehicles allowed. • Any use of the facility that causes damage or vandalism is not permitted. • Please help us make this track safe and fun for everyone! ▪ Pay attention while you are riding, wait your turn, watch for other riders, and call out when passing.
▪ If you're not riding or skating, stay off the track.
▪ Keep food and drink containers outside of the track.
▪ Don't alter track features or add ramps, rails, or cones. ▪ Ride within your abilities.
• The City of South San Francisco is not responsible for any lost or stolen items. • All organized events must have written approval from the Director of Parks and Recreation.
• Fighting, graffiti, vandalism or other aggressive/disruptive behavior is not permissible and may result in a criminal offense.
• Do not use the facility if a hazardous condition exists. • The City reserves the right to close the facility for maintenance, safety, failure to adhere to posted rules, or any other reason.
• Additional obstacles, ramps, jumps or other similar equipment or materials may not be used.
• Using the pump track is a "Hazardous Recreational Activity" per California Government Code 831.7. Use at your own risk.
• All City of South San Francisco Park rules and regulations apply.

Report any damage or hazardous conditions to the
City of South San Francisco Parks Division at (650) 829-3837

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

OPEN DAILY DAWN TO DUSK
IN AN EMERGENCY, CALL 911

PUMP TRACK RULES
The Pump Track is NOT supervised.

EMERGENCY CALL LOCATION: South San Francisco
Centennial Way Park South – Bike Pump Track
Pump Track Rules Sign
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 18” x 24”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer
Color Palette:

Brown (C-56, M-59, Y-72, K-48)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)
Regulatory Signage 9
• Skate at your own risk. Skateboarding, rollerblading and roller skating are hazardous recreational activities.
• Youth under 14 years of age must have parental supervision. • All persons on skateboards must wear appropriate safety equipment. • Skateboarding and skating only. Bicycles, electric bikes, scooters, and motorized vehicles are NOT permitted.
• Any use of the facility that causes damage is not permitted. • Animals, food, alcoholic beverages, tobacco-based products, drugs and drug paraphernalia are prohibited.
• Respect the surrounding park areas such as the playgrounds and picnic sites. • No amplified music.
• Use appropriate language and respectful behavior.
• Additional obstacles, ramps, jumps or other similar equipment or materials may not be used.
• All participants must skate safely at all times and avoid collisions with other participants, and other park and trail users. Ramps must be clear of skaters before you proceed.
• Spectators must stay off skating surfaces.
• Littering, fighting, graffiti, vandalism or other aggressive/disruptive behavior is not permissible and may result in a criminal offense.
• The City of South San Francisco is not responsible for any lost or stolen items. • All organized events must have written approval from the Director of Parks and Recreation.
• Do not use the facility if a hazardous condition exists. • The City reserves the right to close the facility for maintenance, safety, failure to adhere to posted rules, or any other reason.
• All City of South San Francisco Park rules and regulations apply.

Report any damage or hazardous conditions to the
City of South San Francisco Parks Division at (650) 829-3837

CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

SKATE PARK RULES

OPEN DAILY DAWN TO DUSK
IN AN EMERGENCY, CALL 911
The Skate Park is NOT supervised.

EMERGENCY CALL LOCATION: South San Francisco
Centennial Way Park South – Skate Park
Skate Park Rules Sign
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 18” x 24”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer
Color Palette:

Brown (C-56, M-59, Y-72, K-48)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)
Regulatory Signage 10

THIS AREA IS UNDER

VIDEO SURVEILLANCE
NOTICE
Video Surveillance Sign
Notes:

1. Sign size shall be 11” x 5”

2. All border corners shall be 1/2” radius

3. Sign design to be submitted in EPS digital
format to sign fabricator, printed on vinyl,
applied to 12 gauge aluminum, available
from a local custom sign manufacturer
Color Palette:

Brown (C-56, M-59, Y-72, K-48)
White (C-0, M-0, Y-0, K-0)

APPENDIX G
Opportunity Area 1 Improvements

← All documents from this meeting