Cities Index.
SB 343 Item No. 2. 2026.05.13 Budget Subcommittee final2

Budget Standing Committee of the City Council
May 13, 2026

Document
SB 343 Item No. 2. 2026.05.13 Budget Subcommittee final2
Meeting
May 13, 2026
Body
Budget Standing Committee of the City Council
Original file
809 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ci-ssf-ca.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

FY 2026-27 Proposed Budget
May 13, 2026 – Budget Subcommittee Meeting
City of South San Francisco
Presented by: Christie Donnelly, Finance Director
Government Code Section 54957.5
SB 343 Item #2
05/13/2026 SP BUDGET SC
Agenda
2 Key Themes / Overview
FY 2025-26 (Current Year) General Fund Projection
FY 2026-27 General Fund Proposed Budget
Summary
Anticipated Revenues & significant drivers
Anticipated Expenditures & significant drivers
Fund & Reserve Balances
FY 2026-27 Recommended Departmental Adjustments
Positions
Appropriations Adjustments – General Fund
Appropriations Adjustments – Non-General Fund
Takeaways
Requests & Questions
Key Themes &
Budget Overview
Key Themes
4 •Balanced Budget Preserves Current Service Levels
•Limited Reserve Use Addresses Near-Term VLF Impacts
•Prior-Year Budget Slack Reduced
•Revenue Uncertainty Remains, Especially Related to VLF •One-Time Funds Are Not Used for Ongoing Operations
Overview: What This Budget Does — and Does Not Do
A balanced near-term operating plan that preserves services, while recognizing unresolved future risks ✓ What This Budget Is / Does ! What This Budget Is Not / Does Not Address ✓ Balanced Operating Budget
✓ Maximizes Available Funding
✓ Modest, Targeted Adjustments
✓ Addresses City Council Priorities &
Preserves Services
! Future VLF Impacts Remain
Unknown
! State Action Remains Uncertain
.
! Future CalPERS UAL Impacts Not
Yet Determined
! One-Time Funds Not Used for
Ongoing Needs
Bottom line: this budget solves the current-year
operating challenge without using onetime/project funds for ongoing operations — but several major future variables remain
unresolved.
2025-26 Projected FYE
FY 2025-26 General Fund Projection (Excluding Meas W) (in millions) 8 2025-26
Adopted
Budget
Mid-Year 2025-26
Projected FYE
Updated 2025-26
Projected
FYE
Revenues/Transfers In $ 140.5 $ 154.7 $ 158.4
Expenditures/Transfers Out (152.7) (160.5) (159.0)
2026-27 Proposed Budget
General Fund Revenue Updates
10 (vs. $6.8M owed)
General Fund Expenditure Updates
11 Expenditure Updates
Base Payroll Update • Salary and benefits are projected to increase 3.4% over adjusted budget due to:
• 4.0% COLA, step-increases, 3.7% CalPERS UAL payment, and Health Premium (3.2% for Kaiser, 9.2% for Blue Shield) increases. • A vacancy factor of $8.0M salary savings is assumed (approx. 6.4%) Services and Supplies
Adjustment
• Removed approx. $2.4M from the base budget to align the base budget with demonstrated spending patterns.
• This is in addition to $6.0M in savings realized in the current FY.

Interdepartmental
Charges Adjustment
• Increase of $2.5M across all funds ($2.0M GF) to align budget charges with the City’s actual risk-management obligations.

FY 2026-27 General Fund – Proposed Budget Summary (in millions) 12 Beginning Available* Fund Balance $ 42.5
Revenues 156.9
Less: Expenditure 162.4
Surplus/ (Deficit) (5.5)
Use of Available Unassigned Balance 5.5
Net Surplus/(Deficit)
Balanced
Budget
Ending Available Fund Balance** $ 40.5
*Available fund Balance is unassigned general fund balance after policy-level reserves subtracted **20% reserve requirement decreased $3.5M due to lower proposed revenue FY 2026-27 – Projected General Fund Balance
13 Recommended Departmental
Adjustments
Positions
Non-Personnel Operating
Adjustments
General Fund Appropriation
Adjustments - $1.7M total

1. City Attorney
• Expense: $55k Contract Increase

2. City Clerk
• Expense: $200k Elections

3. Economic & Community Development
• Expense: $493k
• $218k EAC Operation Costs and Rent – offset by PLHA grant & rent revenue • $200k Legal Fees (accounting adjustment)
• $75k Consulting Fees
• Revenue: $41k Rent
General Fund Appropriations Adjustments - $1.7M total
17 4. Fire
• Expense: $262k
• $105k EMS-band Radio Replacement
• $157k Supplies and Services – detailed on Attachment 2

5. Human Resources
• Expense: $340k Contract Negotiations and Staffing Study

6. Library
• Expense: $40k PLS Network Increase
• Revenue: $89k Project Read, ASES Grant, and Fines and Fees General Fund Appropriations Adjustments - $1.7M total
18 7. Parks and Recreation
• Expense: $310k
• $249k Orange Memorial Park Aquatics Center pool-related expenses • $61k Utility increase for new parks
• Revenue: $245k Aquatics Expansion

8. Police
• Revenue: $24k Dispatch Services

9. Public Works
• Expense: $11k Additional Services and Supplies, Meeting and Training expenses General Fund Appropriations Adjustments - $1.7M total
19 Non-General Fund Appropriation
Adjustments - $2.2M total

1. Economic & Community Development
• $30k General Plan Website Maintenance
• $30k Developer Deposits
• $300k Housing Service Contracts
• $100k Affordable Housing
• $200k Commercial Linkage Impact Fee

2. Fire
• $525k Portable Radio Replacement and Fire Alerting Hardware:
• $410k Measure W
• $115k Fire Impact Fee

3. Police
• $525k Handgun and Body-Worn/In-Car Cameras and Taser Replacement:
• $359k Measure W
• $166k Police Impact Fee
Non-GF Appropriations Adjustments - $2.2M total
21 4. Public Works
• Expense: $518k
• $510 Stormwater Capture Maintenance and Permit Fee Increase – Stormwater Fund • $8k Safety Attire and Equipment – Sewer Fund
• Revenue: $686k Sewer Rate Increase – Sewer Fund

5. Information Technology
• Expense: $309k Software and Equipment
• $309k Internal Service Fund

6. Stormwater Fund
• Due to statutory limitations, this is currently heavily subsidized with transfers from the General Fund and Gas Tax revenues. This year, an increase of $500k from Measure W to the Stormwater fund is proposed to cover the expenses of operating the City’s new storm capture improvement.

Non-GF Appropriations Adjustments - $2.2M total
22 Position Adjustments
Parks and Recreation
• Convert 1.0 FTE Building Maintenance Stationary Engineer to Lead Crafts Person • Convert 1.0 FTE Arborist Technician to Parks Maintenance Supervisor Public Works
• Convert 1.0 FTE Utility Locator to Senior Public Works Maintenance Worker Position Adjustments – Budget Neutral
24 Parks and Recreation – Measure W & increased pool revenue • Add 15.77 FTE Aquatics Positions
• Add 0.5 FTE Park Maintenance Worker - Hourly
• Add 0.5 FTE Building Maintenance Custodian
Economic and Community Development
• Convert - 1.0 FTE Management Analyst I to Management Analyst II Information Technology – ISF Fund: Allocated in part to GF • Add 1.0 FTE Information Technology Manager
Position Adjustments – Offset through non-GF Funds
25 Oyster Point CFD – Special Tax B (Fund 236):
• 3 Positions previously subsidized by General Fund now able to be funded by increased revenue to Fund 236 • Parks Maintenance Worker • Lead Parks Maintenance Worker
• Senior Parks Maintenance Worker
City Manager’s Office
• Remove – (1.0) FTE Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Officer Library:
• Add 1.0 FTE Librarian II (GF)
• Add 0.5 FTE Office Specialist – Hourly (GF)
Position Adjustments – General Fund
26 Key Takeaways
• City is in relatively good financial health overall
• Unassigned Fund balance position establishes resiliency to withstand economic cycles
• Prudence requires us to discuss and plan for long-term solutions to ongoing & increasing budget deficit
• Budget and forecast will continue to be monitored, updated and refined throughout the year – update(s) will be presented as soon as needed
28 Key Takeaways
• How much can/should the General Fund subsidize
programming?
• How much of unassigned fund balance can/should be
leveraged to offset upcoming stressors such as UAL & OPEB? • How best to prepare for VLF worst-case-scenario?
29 Questions to Begin Asking
• Input on Use $5.5M of General Fund Unassigned Fund
Balance to balance current year General Fund budget.
• Input on Use of $1.1M of Measure W operating revenue
to fund increased costs of Measure-W funded Aquatic
Center
• Any additional guidance to staff in preparation for the City Council study on May 27, 2026.
30 Requested Actions of the Committee
Questions?
FY 2026-27 Proposed Budget
City of South San Francisco

THANK YOU

FOR JOINING US TODAY

← All documents from this meeting