Agenda, regular meeting — St. Helena City Council, September 26, 2023 (part 3 of 3)

eveloped a Feasibility Leve Des gn Memorandum to assist he City of Napa in con tructing a boo ter pump station at the xisting Dwyer Road ?ow control station, thereby creating an up-valley pressure zone and enabl ng utilization of the City's existing clearwellstorage at the Hennessey water treatment plant. Work included pump sizing and selection, alternative pump con?guration layouts, working with City staff to ensure City goals and criteria were met, working with structural and electricalsub-consultants, coordinating with the hydraulic modeling and transient surge analysis team so that modeling ?ndings and recommendations are included in the design
constraints, and preparing the Design Memorandum. Design work included preparing options analysis of three pump
station con?gurations and development of bid documents
(plans and speci?cations). Facilities ncluded a ?rm capacity of 6,250 gpm (9 mgd) with two, 10,000 gallon pressurized bladder tanks (one on suction side and one on discharge side), a 500 gallons surge tank at the turnout of each of the City's two primary customers‘ (the Cities of St. Helena and Calistogal The pump station is part of the City's overall water Water, as delivered through the North Bay Aqueduct and treated at the Jamieson Canyon Water Treatment Plant, and to hold in reserve the localwater supply stored in Lake Hennessey and treated at the Hennessey WaterTreatment Plant for dry years nd technical advisor for several on-call ulting projects over several years including ulic Issues and Tank Replacement, Alta on and Pressure Tank Replacement, HillcrestPump Station Options, and Dwyer ump Installation. Developed municipal water demand ons for the 2050 Napa Valley Water r the Napa County Flood Control and n District.The Project was developed to unicipalities in the development of an esources plan to serve water demands 2050. This effort has included review the methodology and accuracy of the sed in past studies; refinement of the ounty's total existing untreated and treated nd projections of untreated and treated r future demand areas. The primary ultural areas, rural residential, and M&I with approved General Plans.West Vost Id available from each of the following ace water (existing reservoirs, direct diversion and use, and direct diversion and storage in a new or expanded reservoir), imported surface water, recycled water, and groundwater. Demands were compared with
supplies available, and de?cits were identi?ed for projected hydrologic conditions. Alternatives were developed and
analyzed to provide information on which the local agencies can base decisions for future expenditures on infrastructure, including improvements to the imported water system,
recycled water and treated water storage and distribution facilitiesthroughout the valley, and groundwater banking and production facilities.Thiswork has included regular contact with the Water Resources Technical Advisory Committee and coordination with a number of state and federal agencies.

The ultimate product for this work was the development of a long-range plan to integrate all the valley resources into an effective program that will maximize the yield from all available water resources for use in a coordinated and shared manner by all the valley urban agencies and the agricultural community.

Assistant Program/Project Manager for City of Santa Rosa Emergency Groundwater Supply Program. In its 2013 Groundwater Master Plan (prepared by West Yost), the City identi?ed a need for additional groundwater supply sources to serve potable water during emergency conditions The City's emergency groundwater program started several years ago with a test well program. Thisfirst emergency well design project will construct an emergency groundwater supply well in the vicinity of the Martha Way Test Well, one of the most promising of the recently completed test wells. Work included a siting study to determine the optimal parcels for acquisition by the City, preparation of presentation materials to provide to property owners, preliminary design of the pump station facility, preparation of final bid plans and speci?cations for both drilling of the emergency well and equipping of the emergency well, construction management, and engineering services during construction of the well and above-grade facilities. and supply projecti
Resources Study fo
Water Conservatio
assist the valley rn
integrated water r
projected through
planning criteria u estimates of the C water demands, a water demands fo focus was on agric growth consistent quanti?ed the yie sources—|oca| surf Project Manager
water system cons Falcon Ridge Hydr a Heights Pump Stat i Westgate PRVand
RoadTemporary
Dwy
er RFeusi Lvel Pump Siovion Design fy
oa
d Me
mora
ndu m
and Final Design, of CA:ity Nupu,
2050 Water Valley Sludy, Nupu Resources County
Publi c CA:

Emer
genc
y
Groun of Supply City Program, Santa
dwater Rosa,
O
n- C
ul
l
of Consulting, Water System CA:ity Napu,
YO
ST
Jim
|CPageE2
o
n
n
el
l,
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 246 of 282 ends

Project Manager responsible for
managing the update of the City's water system GISdata. Speci?c tasks included reviewing the City's existing GISand making recommendations for using the ESRI LocalGovernment Information Model. The new GISstructure was then validated using available topology tools to verify the integrity of the GISand to help facilitate its conversion to a hydraulic model. A utility map book and train ng workshop were also developed as requested by the City.

Project Manager for a multi-faceted water master plan update for the City of Garden Grove, a community of 160,000 in north-central Orange County. The City is close to built out and the focus of the master plan is addressing system capacity needs, evaluating facilities condition, assisting the City with its asset management program, and updating the City's SCADAmaster plan. For the project, West Yost updated the distribution system hydraulic model, conducted a ?eld program to collect hydrant ?ow test data, calibrated the model pipeline roughness values using the ?eld data and veri?ed the model comparing model operations to SCADAdata. The hydraulic model was used to evaluate normal and emergency operations for existing and future demand conditions.

As part of the project, West Vost also prepared a SCADAMaster Plan update, performed a facilitiescondition assessment of the City's wells and pump stations, and is preparing an Asset Management Plan. West Yost willbe developing a prioritized capital improvement program to address the City's needs.

Project manager
for e update of the City's 2012 Water System Master Plan. As part of the Water Sys m Master Plan Update, West Yost updated the City's all-pipe distribution system ne ork hydraulic model using the City's GISand calibrated the model with hydrant te ata collected for the project. West Vost developed demand projections and c itions, identifying improvements to improve system capacity. West Yost a so ucted a facilitiescondition assessment of the City's pump stations and tanks, and assessment of the City's pipelines to identify renewal and replacement needs. Vost developed a comprehensive, prioritized Water System Master Plan to ess capacity and renewal and replacement needs. The Master Plan also included a -level rate evaluation to assess the impacts of different levels of funding on rates. project was completed in 2021.

Polly Boissevai n
professional engine with experience sanresources water in er planning, with experienc planning distribution and insystem master e hydraulic mode ling
of both and steady analysis for systems, transient water st closed conduit managerial variety She has for of experience aresources water projects in plan
nin
g,
desig operations. and
n,
Professional CivilEngineer,
CaliforniaNo. 36164.

Oregon No. 76795
American Academy of Water
Resources Engineers (AAWRE),
Diplomate, Water Resources
Engineer [D.WRE)
BS,Civil Engineering, Stanford University American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association P
ol
ly
Boi PE, D.WRE
sse
vai
n,
WE
ST
Y
O
ST
Wate
r.

E
n
g
i
n
e
EXP
ERI Water
ENC
E
of GIS Updale, CA: Fair?eld, City
Plann and Modeling System
ing
20 21
Plan of Update, Wat System Master San Bruno, CA:ity
er

STAFF TITL
E:

YEARS OF

PROFESSIO
NAL
REG
ISTR
ATI
ONS
Plan Update, of Garden City Mast Grove, CA: er
th
te
and vmu
Vvest cond addrrkk The hmh
Engine
ering
Mana II
ger
39 E
D
U
C
A
T
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 247 of 282 ends

QCfor an update to the Water Master Planfor the City of Milpitas, which a so includes a Water Utility As et Condition Assessment and a Riskand Resiliency As essment and
Emergency Response P an in compliance w th the America’ Water Infrastructure Act of 2018. The Water Master Plan included an update and calibration of the City water system hydraulic model, evaluation of recent water use trends
and deve opment of future water use projections based on planned development, hydraulic analysis of the City's water system to identify needed water system improvements, and development of a prioritized capital improvement program for implementation of recommended improvements.

Project Manager for a
comprehensive master plan update that included developing a new hydraulic model for the City in Infowater, providing a completed evaluation of the distribution system performance for existing and future demand conditions, inc uding
e aluations of system capacity and pressure, distribution s stern water quality, and performance of the system for fferent outage scenarios West Yost also evaluated the
ture system con?guration to assess transmiss‘on and
stribution system needs to distribute water from the Water eatment Plant to future growth areas. Based on the analysis sults, West Vost developed a list of necessary improvements address existing de?ciencies, serve the City's future growth areas, and a phasing plan to serve near-term development.

The Master Plan also included an asset evaluation for key facilities and linear assets and used |nfoMaster Water to develop a risk assessment model for City‘: water distribution pipelines.

QA/QC
Reviewer for the preparation of a Water System Master Plan and Capacity Reserve Fee Study for the District. Tasksincluded a review and update of the District'ssystem performance criteria; development of potable and recycled water demand projections; update of hydmulic water system models for the potable and recycled water systems; hydraulic analysis of on adopted general plans), and ultimate planning horizons; development of a prioritized capital improvement plan; and performance of a water system capacity reserve fee study. QA/QCfor an update to the Water Master Plan that evaluates water system infrastructure needs and an updated capital improvement plan that supports buildout of the recently-updated EnvisionStockton 2040 General Plan. Project tasks include con?rmation of goals, strategies, and priorities for the City's water system; update and calibration of the City's water system hydraulic model; evaluation of recent water use trends and development of future water use projections based on planned development; hydraulic analysis of the City's water system to identify needed water system improvements; and development of a prioritized capital improvement program to implement recommendations. West Yost will provide
training for City staff on the update and use of the hydraulic model, and West Yost will provide multi-year technical
support for model updates and hydraulic analysis of proposed development projects.

Project
Manager for a comprehensive water master plan update for the City. West Yost prepared a multi-faceted water master plan update for the City. In addition to evaluating the City's water system for its capacity to meet existing demands and future growth, the master plan also included a comprehensive mapping program using hand-held GPS units to map the City's water meters and valves, an assessment of alternative water supplies, including recycled water and gray water, a systemwide condition assessment, using soils information and leak history to prioritize main replacement, a seismic vulnerability assessment to identify improvements to seismically reinforce the system, a water age evaluation to identify and mitigate areas with potential water quality issues, an operations and maintenance review to evaluate existing maintenance programs and staffing, and an advanced meter infrastructure evaluation to assess options to automate the City's meter reading program.

Principal-in-Charge for hydraulic
modeling projects for Eastern Municipal Water District on an as needed basis.The Districtserves customers in a 550 square mile area in western Riverside County. The potable water system has five major service areas with a total of 70 pressure zones. The District's hydraulic model has over 31,000 pipeline features and approximately 25,000 nodes. West Yost used the hydraulic model to provide requested support to the District for several different projects. Requested evaluations have included looking at the Romoland and Murrieta booster pump stations and determining alternatives for rebuilding the hydraulic model to determine hydraulic impacts to the system, improvement requirements, and preliminary cost comparison of the alternatives. The hydraulic model has also been used to support Winchester Hillsdevelopment in determining how many EDUs could be constructed prior to major storage and pumping improvements were required.

Water Plan and Masler Study, Capacity Reserve Fee
Dubli n
Services Disiricl, Dublin, SRamo CA: an
n
OnCull
HModeling Eas?ern Municipal Support,
yd
rauli c
Waler Perris, CA:

Water Plan! and Distribution Sysiem Master
Plan, Yuba of CA:ity,
W
al er
Plan Update, of Menlo City Park, Musl CA: er
W
at er
Plan of Mst Update, Milpilas, CilyA: er W
at er
of Plan, Stockton, City Mast CA: er P
ol
ly
Bo |PageE2
iss eva
in,
W
E
S
T
YO
ST
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 248 of 282 ends

Project
Manager responsible for managing and performing CIA/QCon the development and calibration of the City's water system hydraulic model. Speci?c tasks included importing the City's pipelines, pump stations, and reservoirs into Infowater using the City's Phase 1 GIS updates and record drawings; reviewing and updating the network connectivity with input from City staff; and spatially allocating existing water demands using histor ca meter data. Calibration and verification tasks included placing hydrant pressure recorders and conducting hydrant tests; calibrating the pipeline roughness factors using steady state hydrant test simu ations; and verifying extended period operations using data collected by hydrant pressure recorders. The hydraulic model was successfully validated to confirm the model's effective use as a planning and operational tool. After completion of the model calibration, various demand planning scenarios were also developed in the hydraulic model.
oject Manager/performed QA/QCfor a six-year on-call contract to update aintain the City's water system GISand hydraulic model. GISupdates are to be med monthly and willfollow an organized structure, as defined in a flowchart ped for the project. Hydraulic model updates are to be conducted annually, dditional modeling eva uat‘ons to be conducted on an as-requested basis.

Task Leader responsible for
ping updated demand projections for the City's Water Master Planto recommend rioritize capital improvement projects for a 20-year planning horizon. Demand tions were deve oped with spatial locationsto provide a more accurate future nd allocation in the water system hydrau ic model. Discussionswere held with the Planning Department to better understand the timing of future development and ntify the appropr ate assumptions for Accessory Dwelling Units(ADUs).

Project Engineer
ing a water system master plan and hydraulic model to recommend and prioritize improvement projects for a 20-year plann ng horizon.Tasksincluded conducting a assessment of the City'stanks, wells,and pump stations; review ng water system ies data; and deve oping a hydraulic model to evaluate the City's existing and future systems. Resultsfrom the existing and future water system evaluationswere used elop a comprehensive capital improvement program. Hydraulicmodel development ed calibrationusing ?eld data collected from hydrant tests.

Amy Kwong with aresources engineer awat focus inplanning, water mster er supply and fhydraulic plannin and the modeling, design of water system g, infrastructur e.

Shhas contribute the development plans of many towater master ed throughout I and Environmental
ring, Stanford University,
, CA
and Environmental
ring, San Jose State
‘ty. San Jose, CA
American Water Works
Association
Bay Area Water Works Association Water Education Foundation, 2013 Water Leaders Class WE
ST
Y
OS
T
Water
. E
n
gi
n
e
er
EXP
ERI Water
ENC
E
Model Hydraul Development, of Fairfield, CityA:
ic
A
m
y
KwPE
ong
,
Wafe
r
and GIS On-Call of Hydraulic Modeling Services, City Fuirfield, ys
iem
CA:

M
as
ter
Plan and Modeling System
ning
evelo
nd p
projec
toCity's ide towater develop‘ capital facility facilit dev includ STAFF 1’|TLE'

YEARS OF E
X
P
E
RI
E
N
C
E.

PROFESSION
AL
RE
GIS
TR
ATI
ON
S
W
at er
Plan Update, City of Garden Mast Grove, CA: er W
al er
Master of Plan, City Syslean Bruno, CA: m
MS, Civi
Enginee
Stanford
Enginee Umversu
Prof
essi
onal
Civil Engineer,
Calif
orni a
No. 73213
Pr
and m
develo with a
P
R
O
F
E
S
SI
O
N
A
L

AFFILIATIONS
Princip
al
II
18 Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 249 of 282 ends

4 A‘
Project
Engineer for an update to the Water Master Plan for the City of Milpitas, which also includes a Water Utility Asset ConditionAssessment and a Riskand Resiliency Assessment and Emergency Response Plan in compliance with the
America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018. Created and calibrated hydraulic model based on the City's GISdatabase, record drawings, and hydrant tests. Refinedthe City's water use factors by linking water meter data to existing land uses.

Simulated a range of demand and outage conditions for
the existing and future water system and identified capital improvement projects to mitigate existing deficiencies and meet the needs of future developments.

Project Engineer responsible for developing and analyzing unit water demand factors to project future water demands based on the City's adopted General Plan land uses. Additionaltasks included updating the City's existing potable water system hydraulic model and developing a new recycled water system model to be used for analyzing future water demands and subsequently identify required backbone
infrastructure to serve buildout of the adopted General Plan. Improvement projects identi?ed from the hydraulic model evaluations were used to develop a comprehensive
capital improvement plan. An additional Operations Guide was developed after the Citywide Water Master Plan to provide City operations staff with a document outlining the recommended water system operational strategies during
typical winter and summer demand periods. The Operations Guide also evaluated the impacts to the existing water system from proposed near-term infrastructure improvements.

Project Engineer responsible for the development of potable and recycled water demand projections. Additionaltasks
included development of specific tools to allow Districtstaff to easily update water demand projections in the hydraulic model and training for District staff on using the hydraulic model and demand projection tools.
is performing static calibration and dynamic verification of the City's water system hydraulic model. In coordination with City staff, West Yost conducted hydrant tests to confirm the roughness coefficients (C-factors) of pipelinesthroughout the water system. The City's hydraulic model was calibrated to match observed field conditions. Following model calibration, West Yost is proceeding with dynamic veri?cation for summer and winter conditions, which consists of developing extended period simulations that generally mimic observed trends over a 48-hour period. Diurnal demand patterns were also developed as part of the veri?cation process.

Project
Manager responsible for leading the development of the
City's Water Master Plan update. The update process included the development and calibrationof a new hydraulic model to represent the City's water system. Improvement projects identi?ed from the hydraulic model evaluations were used to develop a comprehensive and prioritized capital improvement plan to address de?cienciesin the City's existing water system.

Project Engineer responsible for
the hydraulic evaluation of the San Jacinto Valley service area.

Project tasksincluded updating the hydraulic model with new facilitiesnot in the GIS,validating the hydraulic model through comparisons with ?eld operating data, preparing hydraulic evaluations to identify de?ciencies and needed improvements, developing cost estimates for capital facilities and documenting results of the master plan in a comprehensive report.

Project Manager responsible for
leading the development of the City's Water Master Plan update. The update process included the development
and calibration of a new hydraulic model to represent the City's water system. Improvement projects identified from the hydraulic model evaluations were used to develop a
comprehensive and prioritized capital improvement plan to address deficienciesin the City's existing water system.

Project Engineer
responsible for developing the City's buildout water
demand projections and updating the water demands in
the hydraulic model. Directed and performed QA/QCon
the hydraulic model calibration (using steady state hydrant test simulations) and verification (using extended period simulations) as well as the existing and buildout water system hydraulic evaluations. Results from the existing and buildout water system evaluations will be used to develop a comprehensive capital improvement program.

Project
Engineer responsible for developing a water master plan and hydraulic model to recommend and prioritize capital included reviewing water system facilities data and developing a hydraulic model to evaluate the City's existing and future water systems. Specialized evaluations included a review of the City's standard operating procedures, an assessment of potentially using the City's emergency groundwater wellsfor potable water supply, and the development of a Sustainability Plan. Resultsfrom the existing and future water system evaluations were used to develop a comprehensive capital improvement program. Hydraulicmodel development included both static calibration using ?eld data collected from hydrant tests and dynamic veri?cation using a 24-hour period simulation.

Water Plan and Musler Reserve Cupucily Fee
Study
,
Services District, Dublin, San Ramon CA:

WaterFPlan Update, esMaster Eusiern Munizipul Iu
n Wate
r DPerris, CA:
is
tr
ic
t,
WalerModel Calibration and Hydraulic S
y
stem
Verif
icati
on,
of CA:ity Napa,
Trans
missi on
Update, Planning Syslem Zone Watr 7
Agen
cy,
Liv CA: erm
ore,
Ci
lyw
id
e
Plan, of Water Mster CA:ily System Tracy, W
at er
Plan Update, of City Mast CA: Milpitus, er
W
at er
of Plan, Hayward, City Syst Musler CA: em
W
at er
Plan, of Healdsburg, Mast CA:ify
er W
at er
of Plan, Modesto, City Mast CA: er
v
v
Am
y
Page K2EIwo
ng,
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 250 of 282 ends

Project engineer leading the recalibrationof the hydraulic model in lnfoworks.The District's existing hydraulic model was recalibrated with ?ow monitoring data from the 2014 wet season and then recalibrated with limited flow monitoring from the 2020 wet season The goal was to analyze the effect of capital improvement projects that were performed between the two sets of flow monitoring data. Additional analysis was performed on available Smartcover data in an attempt to determine if certain types of rehabilitation or replacement projects were more effect ive in reducing in?ow and in?ltration Recommendations for further Smartcover monitori ng were developed.

Project manager for the wastewater
master plan for the City. Project focused on a system w'de ?ow monitoring program, in?ow and in?ltration analysis, development of a fully dynamic hydraulic model and all model inputs using lnfoSWMM,evaluation of the system under existing and future dry weather and wet weather flowevents, and deve opment of a capital improvemen t program. The project involved review of land use data and Sign ?cant IndustrialUser s
that contribute flowto the sewer system. The mode was deve oped from GIS,survey data and record drawings. The model was calibrated to measured dry weather and w et weather ?ows and used to evaluate the system under dry weather conditions and we t weather storm events for current and future flowconditions Project manager lea
din
g
the analysis of the wastewater collection system for opportunitie to reduce in?ow an d
infiltration(|&I)in the system Thisincluded coordinating ?eld work, documenting an d analyzing the ?ndings, and making recommendations for IE4!reduction methods We st Yost analyzed available ?ow monitor ng data to determine the type of |&l occurring within the collection system with the goal of reducing the yearly volume of wastewater PatrickJohnston is a civilengineer who focusesplannin design, the and g, construction support services for water and wa
ste
wat er
and systems environmental
projects. Hisexperience includes preparing desi
gn
pla and speci?cations evaluating ns,
treatment alternatives, modeling wastewater an
d
hydraulic developing systems, wa
ter utility master planning documents, preparing co
st
administration, est contract
im
ate
s,
construction survey layout and construction m
an
ag
em
en
t
and for supply water
wastewater projects.

Patrick'sexperience includes collection system modeling ausing variety ofsoftware packages. Patrickhas experience u
sin
g
billing dataevelop wat to
er wastewater loads, calculating landuse-based ?ow
fauture flow and developing
ct
or
s
projections based on planning documents and experience data. Prick has develop flow monitoring plans, analyzing flow ?ow data and using monitoring data to calibrate the dry weather an
d
?ow weath for wcomponents
et er collectionsystem models
EXPE
RIEN Infiltratio
nCE
aInflow Madel Update, Analysis/ Valley Sanitary Ross nHydraulic d Disfrid, Raf CA:
ael,
P
at
ri
c
k
John PE
ston,
WE
ST
Y
O
ST
Water
. E
n
gi
n
e
er
M
ast
er
Plan and Modeling System
ning
MS, CivilEn
gin
eer
ing
,
Stanford
University, CA
BS, CivilEng
inee
ring
,
Tufts
Unlversitv, MA
In
fl
ow
and Infiltratio Reduction of Services, Cityotufi, CA: n

STAFF YIYLE

YEARS OF E
X
P
E
RI
E
N
C
E
"

PROFESSION
AL
RE
GIS
TR
ATI
ON
S
American S
o
ci
et
y
of Civil
Engineers
Northern C
al
ifor ni a
Pipe Users
Group
W
ast ew
av
er
Plan, of Slocklon, Master CA:ity
Prof
essi
onal
Civil Engneer,
Calif
ornia
No. 59028
Princi
pal
EIn
gi 28ne
er
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 251 of 282 ends

Project Engineer responsible for development and
calibrationof a fully dynamic model of the sanitary sewer system for the central area of the city of San Jose, which included nearly 400,000 linearfeet of pipe and approximately 1,500 manholes and pipes. The model was completed with
InfoworksCS,from Wallingford Software, which was capable of dealing with the numerous flow splits and integrating results from separate modeling work that was being simultaneously performed for adjacent upstream and downstream areas of the City. The model was used to develop capacity improvement projects to resolve the capacity de?ciencies. Projects were prioritized and assembled into a Capital Improvement Program of recommended projects for the Cityto implement over the next 20 years.

Gathered existing data and shape ?les from the City, and used them to develop mapping for the existing and future land uses in the Centralarea. Populationestimates were developed
from the land use mapping, whichwere then used to generate flows.Used the existing shape fileinformationto develop the data was used to calibrate the model for dry weather and to develop contributing flows entering the Central area from adjacent areas that were not modeled. Resultsfrom concurrent modeling of adjacent areas that were modeled were used to include downstream backwater conditions, as well as incoming flows entering the central area from upstream areas. Design storms were developed to simulate typical wet weather conditions that result in significant inflowand in?ltration. Wet weather flow monitoring was used to develop wet weather parameters for each sub-basin and then to calibrate the model for wet weather conditions. The model was then run for existing conditions, short- term future conditions and long-term future conditions. Deficiency conditions were identi?ed for each of the sets of modeling results, determining which pipes were not capable of transporting the model ?ows. The model was used to develop capacity improvement projects to resolve the capacity de?ciencies.The projects were prioritized and assembled into a Capital Improvement Program of the recommended projects for the City to implement over the next 20 years. he wastewater treatment fac' ty Ana ysi
ing groundwater in? tration during the wet
lytarget. lnitialrecommendation isfor CCN
e low y ng areas of the collect on syst m, with
Iysisfor further recommendations
Project eng‘neer responsible for development of a
fully dynam c model of the wastewater collectionsystem Flows were based on a previously developed model. Updated GIS?les were used to develop the hydraulic model and ?ow monitoring data was used to calibrate the model for both dry and wet weather ?ows. The model was then used to analyze system capacity, identify deficiencies and recommend improvement projecc.

Providedengineering support to further
analyze previously recommended improvement projects and provide alternative solutions A portion of the system that alternatives. Project r for projects to develop a hydraulic model of the wastewater collection system and to develop a 20- pital improvement program CC|'V-based condition assessment informationwas incorporated with the results from the hydraulic model to develop a prioritized rehabilitationand replacement program. Cost estimates were developed for the proposed replacement projects and included in a database that provided a recommended approach for the rehabilitation and replacement program for the next 20 years Engineering Support responsible ting system using HzOMap Water alley Plan and its Supplemental ent presents alternatives to ed within Yosemite Valley. The ' document included several ds enhancing the ecological and .The Master Planincorporated tructure in a way that integrated orridor for ease of access and ofsewer locations to serve ed construction cost estimate for ajor project activities included rameters within the H.OMap Sewer ates of hydraulic output reporting Project Engi neer
for resp creating
onsi
ble model of the City's existing w
as
tew
at er
collectio system
n using HxOMap Sewer. Used wat er
billing minformation
ete
r and sewer return rates to devel
op
?othe for model. Created ws a flow monitoring plan to meas ure exi wastewater flows
stin
g
under both dry and wet weathe
r
cThis information
o
n
d
it
i
o
n
s.
was used to perform complete of the which model, was then used to analyze the c ap
a
ci
ty
the ofsystem under
peak wet weather flows. Areas insu capacity were
ffici
ent
identi?ed.
for developing model of exis
and ArcView. The Yosemite V
Environmental Impact Statem
improvements projects locat
preferred alternative of this
improvements geared towar
cultural features of the Park
these changes into the infras
the utilitiesinto a common c
Participated in the planning future facilities and complet master planning purposes. M modificationsto pipeline pa model, simulations, and upd for technical memorandum.

Capacit
y
and Assessment CIP Infil n
trati don/
Infl
ow
Develo
pment
for and Cease Order Desist Compliance, City
of Mary
sville,
CA:

Yose
mite
Vall Plan, of U.S. National Department Inlerior,
ey Park Portal, CA: El
CastroSunilary District, Engineering Support,
CastroCA:
discharged to t
revealed on-go
season as a lik
e inspection in th
continuing ana
Sewe
r Eand Capacity Plan, of Assessment City
va
lu
ati on
Davi
s,
C
A:

Map
ping,
and Master of Mod Planning, City San
eling, Jose,
C
a
r
District, Area Wusfewuter Carmel, CA: manage
existing
year ca
YOS
T
P
at
rickl o
h
n
sto
n,
|PEage 2
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 252 of 282 ends

V1!
Project Engineer and
Lead Modeler for this project. He reviewed previously prepared technical studies schematic level designs of two alternatives to convey overland drainage in the col Gateway area. The project included hydrologic/hydraulic modeling of the ting ?oodplain and alternative improvement projects, coordination with pr'vate d owners, and coordination with the CEQAconsultant and regulatory agencies alifornia Department of Fishand Wildlife, etc) He developed a drainage plan that educed the total project cost by about 40 percent under the previously considered lternatives Also, the performance of the lower cost project has been veri?ed as better than the performance of the previous plans. Doug performed the engineering evaluations for this project, which included con?rmation of the sizing of a proposed USACEdetention basin/pump station, evaluation of existing storm drains (sized for a 10~year storm) and channels to partially convey the 100 year storm ?ows, sizing of a proposed new pump station, and determination of the residual ?ooding depths and ?ow directions and velocitiesthrough 2-dimensional ?ood modeling using XPSWMM The 2-dimensional ?ood mode ing results were presented in easily understandable maps of ?oodwater depths (colored shading) and ?ow vectors (arrows dep'ct-ing the direction and velocity) for existing conditions From these existing conditions maps, improvements were developed that reduce the 100-year ?ooding to a eve that willinclude only minor ponding in the pubic streets. Flooding depth and ?ow velocity maps were prepared for the improvement alternatives. By comparing the existing condition and improved conditions maps, the level of ?ood reduction s eas ly visualized and the bene?t of the proposed improvements is understood Project manage on
a study to evaluate detention basin opportunities to reduce the 100 year ?ooding along ElkGrove Creek. West Yost eva uated expanding four existing detention basins Doug Moore is an engineer with experience drainage facility planning, stor master im stormwater computer modeling, facilities p lan
n
in
g
,
and prelimin design, design
ary speci?cations, construction and capital cost project permitting, and project management He has hydrologic and hydra
ulic mo expertise (1with XPSWMMdel
ing
and 2 dimensional modeling), Sacramento HEC-1, 2, HEC-HMS, RAS, MOUSE,MIKEURBAN,and RiverFLO2D.H
e
prov initial detailed planning,
ided design, and construction period engineering large forur detention basin se rv
ic
e
s
projects, each of which created signi?cant Doug habitat has performed areas. wastewater treatment plant planning and fhas prepared potable evalu He ations water demand estimates and facility evalua
tions.
isskilled potable He preparing at
water, wastewater, and stormwater evaluat
ions
for develop speci?c plans, city
ment and county wide general plans, and enviro
nmenta
l
impactsparticularly Doug reports.
skilled at quickly developing infrastructure and plans tht minimize construction costs without compromising sy
s
te
perfor mance
.

Professional Civil Engineer,
CaliforniaNo. 58122,
Nevada No. 19924
MS, Civil Engineering, University
of California, Davis
BS,Geology, University of Oregon
BS.Mathematics, University of
Oregon
CaliforniaStormwater Quality Association Floodplaln Management Association CaliforniaWater Environment Association, Sacramento Area Section 2011 Engineering Achievement Award - Dry Creek Levee Relocation at the Wastewater Treatment Plant, City of Roseville American Society of Civil Engineers, Sacramento Section 2011 SmallFloodControl Project of the Year — Dry Creek Levee Relocation at the Wastewater Treatment Plant, City of Roseville WE
ST
Y
O
ST
Water
.

E
n
g
i
n
e
EX
PER Sosco
lIEN
CE
Inlerior of Drainage City Nupu, CA: Proied,
D
o
u
g
Moo PE
re,
S
io
r
m
w
af
er
and Flood Resilience E
l
k
Creek Detntion Basin Gof Sudy, City Grove, CA: Elk
ro
v
e

STAFF YITL
E:

YEARS OF E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E
:

PROFESSIO
NAL
REG
IST
RAT
ION
Engine
ering
Mana II
ger
30 and
(CIan
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 253 of 282 ends

Project Manager for the preparation of
the original UC Davis Storm Drainage Master Plan (SDMP) in 2000, and prepared updates of the SDMP in 2006 and
2014. The 2014 update was undertaken to include use of a linked 1- and 2-dimensional (10 and 2D) modeling. The 2014 update included modeling the storm drain system using the 1-dimensional layer of the XPSWMM model, and using the
2-dimensional model layer to simulate ?ood water pending and ?ow over the ground surface. The model included
about 1,300 1-dimensional model linksand about 200,000
ground surface grid cells (15 ft by 15 ft). stormwater system monitoring was performed the morning of December 2,
2012, and included measuring freeboard depths at manholes, ?ooding depths at several low areas around campus, and
photographing ?ooded streets and pedestrian paths around campus. The storm was simulated with the XPSWMM
model. The model was calibrated using this storm event, gaged water levelsin the Arboretum Waterway and in the
main stormwater liftstation, gaged discharge from the lift CentralCampus to the current land uses and drainage facility conditions. Finished?oor elevations of many of the buildings were surveyed and compared to the modeled water surface elevations to accurately evaluate the risk of building ?ooding. Areas of particular risk of ?ooding were identi?ed. Flooding from buildout land use was also evaluated, and three alternative drainage plans were developed and evaluated to address ?ooding. Alternative ?ood reduction improvements were evaluated, a preferred set of improvements were identi?ed, and construction cost estimates were prepared. Use of the 2 dimensional model allowed for an accurate evaluation of shallow surface channels and culverts to convey the runoff to a large detention basin. The basin was sized for a 100-year storm. Surface conveyance of the runoff was necessary because constructing large storm drains in the Campus is nearly impossible because of the many other underground utilities. ?oodplain storage project (collectively ca led the "basins”) In the Phase 1 evaluation each of the basins was modeled using the City's SacCalchydrologic models and/orthe City's HEC-RAShydraulic model The resulting changes n ?ows an
d water surface elevations were determ ned and compared with existing conditions. The water surface elevations were also compared with previously surveyed structure ?nished ?ood elevations, and the number of predicted ?ooded
structures was tabulated. Project construction and total capital cost estimates were also prepared. The Phase 1
results were presented to City staff in a workshop, and fro m the workshop ?ve combinations of the individual project were identi?ed for further evaluation (Combinations A-E).

Phase 2, Combinations A-Ewere evaluated with the Saccal c and HEC-RASmodels and the resulting ?ow, water surface elevation, and ?ooded structures were summarized. The
results of the Phase 2 work were presented to City staff in econd workshop. The work was also summarized in draft
nal Technical Memoranda.

Project Manager for a project to
the downstream impacts ofthe increased ?ow and p
rep
a
re
a
hydraulic impact evaluation technicalmemorandum the for District due to Caltrans enlarging a culvert under Inte rsta
te80
from a 24-inch, cormgated metal pipe to a 3l'.Linch,s
interior steel pipe,which increased the ?ow crossing The evaluationidenti?ed the lowest-costand most feasib
le
ap
pr oa
ch
to mitigate the increased ?ow was to construct 800 fof new 30-inch storm drain in Skibbereenl.ane and Fleming
The geotechnical investigation of the new drain alig
nme nt
identi?ed shallowbedrock, whichcan be a concern fun
kn
ow
n
conditions and added costs during construction. In li
g
h
t
of this,
West Vost prepared the construction plansset and b
i
d
ap
p
ro
a
ch
to deal with the bedrock that would reduce the num
ber
of
change ordersfor the District,led a prebid meeting,
provided engineering services during construction.

Quality
Quality Control reviewer for a ?oodplain evaluati on.

The City
of ElkGrove plans to construct a raised pedestria n
tralong
ai
l Laguna Creek and Whitehouse Creek. The trail in
c
lu
d
e
s
one
bridge crossing Whitehouse Creek and two bridg
es
cros
sin
g
Laguna Creek.West Yost is completing a hydrauli c
an
a
l
y
si
s
using HEC-RASsoftware to determ ne the impac
t
the
proposed project to the ?oodplain during the 10and
100-year design storms and evaluating mitigationto
reduce or eliminate the impact The evaluation inc
lud
es
a scour analysis for the three proposed bridges the HEC RASmodel for the preferred alternative.

Skibbere
en Drain Mo Storm and Planning Designnve
ifh Bidand Flood and Services, Wasvewoler Vallejo
District, CA:

Lugun
a Cr and Whiiehouse Mulli-Funclionul Creek
ee
k Corri
dor
of City Grove, CA: Elk Pro
ietl
,
Stor m
Plan Musler Updufe, of 2014 University
Calif
ornia
,
Davis:

YOS
T
D
ou
g
PageE2MIoo
re.

Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 254 of 282 ends

vy
Leadproject engineer to conductfacilty assessments for mechanical,safety, electrical and instrumentation, structural, and civilfacilitiesfor 13 municipalwells and ?ve booster pump stations within the City's distribution system. The assessments includedvalves, pumps, piping, control valves, corrosion, operations, site drainage, security, pavement, safety, and code evaluation Structural and electricalevaluationswere also conducted by subconsultants Met with 0&M staffto review operational concerns and needs.

Assistedin developing a tiered assessment approach based on condition, useful life,cost to rehabilitatevs replace, and the criticalnature ofthe facilityand individualpiece of equipment. Prepared preliminary cost estimates of recommended improvements.

Project Manager for design of
a 2.0 MG prestressed concrete tank with a dome roof to replace a 60-year old concrete tank.The project includedlayout and design oftank appurtenances, adding a chlorination system, tank mixer, ?exible connections, and seismic shut offsystem, and improvements to site security. A FaultTrace Study was conduct because ofthe project site's proximity to the San Andreas Fault.Finaldesign forthe tank included collaborationwith the geotechnical engineer and the tank manufacturersto develop design parameters for continued operation after a seismic event. The project is currently under construction. Prepared preliminary and engineer's construction cost estimates Construction: $4,588,000.

Project design lead
to conduct a conditionassessment of two (2.0 and 4.0 MG) welded steel tanksforthe City ofVacaville.The existing tankswere originallyconstructed is 1970 ang 1976, respectively.

The purpose of the evaluationwas to determine structural, safety, coating improvements necessary to meet current codes and extend the usefullifeofthese tanks.The project included review ofthe City's previous dive inspection reports, visualobservations, and review with maintenance staffinput. Enhanced interior coating systems were evaluated to extend the lifeof the coating system. The project improvements recoating the exterior and aeration systems to reduce THMlevels fall protection systems, and various site improvements JeffWanlass has more tha n
year of experience 2planning, project inmanagement, s0 design, and services durin g
foracilities. chas prepared supply He water
plans and speci?cations co
nf or m
in
g
the requirements contracting tofor agencies, state
municipalities,water agen
cies,
and private clients. civil experience His engineer includes designs for water and recy
cled
pump tanks, stora transmission stations, mains,
ge groundwater supply wells
,
grad and plans development drainage for site project.
ing
Jeffhas been involvedin thanank and 25pump station projects, including inspection, rehabilitation, and new facilities.

Professional CivilEngineer,
California No. 60930
Professional CivilEngineer,
Oregon No. 91821
MS, Civiland Environmental
Engineering, Brigham Young
University
University American Water Works Association CaliforniaStormwater Quality Association EXP
ERI Garden
EN
CE
—Plan of Wter Master Grden Fucilify City Assessment, Grove, CA:

W
ES
T
Y
OS
T
Wate
r.

E
n
gi
ne
er
ed
J
ef
f
WPE
an
la
ss
,
B
ut
th
er
Road Tank Evaluation and Recoa?ng, of Vucaville, CityA:

STAFF TITLE.

YEARS OF E
X
P
E
RI
E
N
C
E.

PROFESSION
AL
RE
GIS
TR
ATI
ON
Gl
en
vi
ew
3Tank Replacement, of City San Bruno, CA: P
u
m
p
and Tanks Stat
ion
s
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
l
O
N
A
l

AFFIUATIONS
Princip
al
II
24 E
D
U
C
A
T
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 255 of 282 ends

Project Manager to
conducted interior inspections, via a raft, to determine the extent the concrete damage and corrosion associated with the interior steel diaphragm. Recommended improvement were
developed and a report was prepared summarizing ?nding
and recommendations.Technicalspeci?cationswere prepared necessary for City crews to implement the recommended
improvements.

Lead
Project Engineer responsibleto design review and technical consultant for design by others of a 2.0 MG prestressed concrete tank and 6,300 gpm booster pump station. The tank is partially buried with a column support ?at slab roof, with a diameter of 108 feet and a wall height of 34 feet. The pump station facilitiesconsist of two 60—horsepowerand four 125-horsepower vertically mounted mixed?ow pumps enclosed in a 58-foot by 32-foot masonry building.The electricalequipment, including variable frequency drives, willbe located in a climate controlled room in the building. Chemicalfeed system forsodium
building in sound attenuating enclosure. LeadProject Engineer responsibleto design review and technical consultant for design by others of a 3.75 MG prestressed concrete tank and 8,170 gpm booster pump station. The tank is partially buried with a column support ?at slab roof, with a diameter of 137 feet and a wall height of 40 feet.The pump station facilities consist of two 40-horsepower and four 150-horsepowervertically mounted mixedflow pumps enclosed in a 65-foot by 35-foot masonry building.The electricalequipment, including variable frequency drives, willbe located in a climate controlled room in the building.Chemicalfeed system forsodium hypochlorite and ammonia are locatedin separate rooms. Emergency standby power facilitiesare locatedexterior of the building in sound attenuating enclosure. Project Manager to evaluate and design additional capacity at an existing pump station and tank. The project included increasing the pump station capacity from two 50 horsepower (hp) pumps sizedto ?ow about 300 gallons per minute (gpm) each to four pumps with a capacity of about 750 gpm for a finn capacity of about 2,300 gpm. The work tasks included evaluating the existing site to determine locationof new generator and electricalservices, electrical upgrades, replacing the existing generator located inside the building to outside, evaluating existing piping forthe increased ?ow, evaluate adding an additional tank. Prepared Preliminary Design Report and plan and speci?cations for the recommended project.

Project Manager for evaluationsafety systems and
interior condition assessment of a 3.0 MGwelded steel tank.

The tank was constructed n 1967 with a diameter of 110.5 feet and shellheight of 28.0 feet and Includes a steel dome roof.

Project includedobservationof the interior coating systems and corrosion, developed plans and speci?cations to installper'meter safety guardrail, ladder safety improvements, repair corrosion along the chime, and repair corrosion pits on the interior ?oor plate
Project Manager fora condition assessment and
ation ofthe District'sLaVistaWater Storage Tank.The
ct includedinterior and exterior coating and corrosion
sments, structural and seismic analysis, safety and
evaluation, geotechnical evaluation, and developed
alternative improvements projects. Alternative 3 was mended as itwillprovidethe Districtwith a tank that allcurrent codes and standards, and providesthe
ilityto add additional storage capacity to meet future
d by the Districtso the existing tank could remain in service g construction of the new tank. Leaddesign engineer for a 1.0 MG welded steel tank, 1.6 mgd booster pump station, and 1,000 feet of ch transmission mains The tank is an at-grade tank with meter of 66 feet and a shellheight of44 feet.The pump n facilitiesconsist of fourverticalturbine pumps (two 50-hp o 30-hp) with space for a ?fth future pump. Design also ded a 3,100-gallon hydropneumatic surge tank, and site ‘ngand drainage 16-in
a dia
statio
inclu
grad:

Project Manager to
conduct extensive inspection and evaluation for three welded steel tanks ranging in size from 0.25 to 2.0 milliongallons.

The work tasks includedsite and tank interior inspections and develop recommendations for bringing the tanks up to current structural and seismic codes, conduct site speci?c geotechnical investigations, evaluate potential corrosion and the condition of the coating systems, evaluate the interior and exterior piping, evaluate safety, security, drainage, and current health and OSHArequirements, evaluate site accessibility and potential improvements, and the determine the logisticsfor taking the and electricalsystems. Areport willbe prepared summarizing our ?nding and recommendations, including construction cost estimates Alha
mbra
Elev Tank Structural and Corrosion Concrete
ated Eval
uatio
n,
of Sacramento, CA:ity
Evalu
ation
Tank of R16, Water R17, 8. R9A and Storage
Pump of Santa Rosa, CA:ity
Recy
cled
and Station W Tank Pump City Storage Proiect, er of Ha
ywa
rd,
CA:

Greg
ory
Tank Gar Steel Evaluation, Contra Wate Costa
den
s Distri
ct,
C
A:

La Vi
sta
TaInspecti and Evaluation, Carmichael Water
nkon Distri
ct,
C
A:

Gari n
and Pump Station of Improvements, City
Hay
ward
,
CA:
evalu
proje
meets SUPP recom flexib owne code three du?n
C
or
de
s
Ran Tank of Pump Station, &CA:ity Tracy,
ch
T
ra
cy
8; Hill Tank of Pump Station, CA:ity Tracy,
s
Je
ff
|PageE2
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 256 of 282 ends

Project Manager for the preliminary and detailed design milli $ on3 improvements to an existing ozone system. Improvements to the 40 m gd
sur
fa
c
e
water treatment facility ncluded new ozone generators capable of prod ucin
g
ozone
gas at 10 12% by weight to replace the 30 year-old generators that pro duc
ed
?ve to
six percent by weight, modificationsto the ozone gas diffuser grids wit hin
plan's th
e existing pre ozone contactors; and replacement of aging residual ozone units Improvements to the ozone generators and configuration of the gas dif fus
er
grids
improved gas transfer and dispersion and addressed a range of plant flow and rat es ozone demand conditions related to the variable blends of surface wate r
frtwo
o sources with signi?cantly different ozone demand and DBPprecursor c h
a
ra
c
t
e
ri
st
i
c
s
ed as Project Engineer for the detailed design phase of this proj ect
upgra to
de g liquidoxygen (LOX)storage and ozone generation systems at mgd 3 0 ter treatment plant. The project included replacement of a L O
X
d
e
liv
e
ry
ection equipment, a 12,000-gallon LOXstorage tank, two existi ng
5, cf/hr
00 0
and associated valving and pressure regulation equipment. T h
e
pr also
oj ec
t
placement ofthree existing power supply un ts (PSUs)for thr ee ex300
ist
in
g
clay(ppd) ozone generators and installationof a new closed lcool ing o serve the new PSUs. In order to compress the construction the worked with the City and major equipment manufacturers t apre ex e
cut e
tagreement which locked in pricing and allowed the manufa cturer
begin to
mittal process ahead of bidding the project.
serv
xistin
ce wa
conn
izers,
ed re
5 per
skid t
teammen
p sub
Manager
for an all-hazards America's Water InfrastructureAct (AWIA)2018- compliant
Risk and
ResilienceAssessment (RRA)and Emergency Response Plan (ERP).Wes t
compl Y
oeted
st a thorough gap analysis after reviewing and organizing previouslycompleted and RRAERP<relatedresources. West Yost completed the RRAand ERPaccordin g
the America ton Water Works Association standards, which represent cross-sector bestThe RRAincludes an assessment of natural, built, cyber, and personnel ass ets, and relevant
threats and hazards. West Yost developed riskand resiliencemanageme nt
strat to
egie
s address the highest risksand reduce vulnerabilities.

AndySmith has perfor
med
of wide an work avariety planning design for numerous water and wastewater treatm
ent
agencies facior California and His Oregon treatment in
litie
s
facilityexperience incl
ude
s
and planning predesign, design mast detailed and cost er estimating, and engine ering
construction. during expertise service His treatment includes s preliminary treatment, chemical and ?ltration, disinfection, storage metering, pumping stations, soli
ds
and has dewatering. He worked honfacilities treatment an dl
in
g,
with capacities rangingmgd. 40<1to
2018 Risk and Infrastructure Water Act Resilience and Assessment Emer
genc
y
P|on of Compliance Fairfield, Respon Project, CityA:
se
EXPE
RIEN North
CE
Ba
y
Plant Rof Water Treatment Ozone System Improvements, City egi o
n
al
Fnirfield,
WE
ST
Y
OS
T
Water
. E
n
gi
n
e
er
CaliforniaWater E
n
v
iro
n
Association
Central Valley Clea n Association
American Water
Association
A
n
d
y
Smi PE
th,
Oz on
e
Plant, Fairfield, Impr Waterman Water Treatment CA: Proiecl, ove ment s
W
at
er
and Wasfewat Treatment
er
Andy
the e
water design vapor includ pounrocure the sho
STAFF TITLE:

YEARS OF E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E
:

PROFESSION
AL
REG
ISY
RAT
ION
S
85, C
iv
il
EnUnlversity
gin
eer
ing
,
of Ca
lif or ni
a,
Davis
Profe
ssion
al
Civil Engineer,
Calif
ornia
No. 74673
P
R
O
F
E
S
SI
O
N
A
L

AFFILIATIONS
Princip
al
EIn
g17
in
e
e
r
E
D
U
C
A
TI
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 257 of 282 ends

Project Engineer. West Yostdesigned a complete remodel ofthe NBRWTP’sexisting 1,500 square foot water quality laboratory.

Improvements are being implemented to the lab to better align the layout with the work being perfon-ned in the laboratory; eliminate unnecessary and outdated analyt calequipment; and modernize the countertops, cabinets, and Ighting. West Yost worked collaboratively with existing laboratory and operations staff in a series of workshops to deten-nine the Cities‘needs and develop a preferred layout Design cha lenges included extensive modi?cationsto the laboratory's original HVACand plumbing systems, including working around a complex existing process water &drain piping manifold designed to provide process water to various online, in-labwater quality instruments.

Project Manager for a screening-level evaluation
of options for increasing the City of Vacavi|le's surface water treatment capabilities, which are currently limited to seasonal, intermittent operation of a nominal 12 MGDdiatomaceous
earth treatment facility West Yost's work includes development water from LakeBerryessa South Canal, candidate treatment facility sites and configurations for a WTPproviding between 15 and 25 MGD of finished water a buildout, and planning levelfacility costs and implementation schedules. The results of these evaluations WI Iinform City-wide water master planning work being conducted by West Yost, and will provide valuable reference points as the Cities and Vacaville and Fair?eldexamine potential future expansions of the nearby North Bay Regional WTP,whichcurrently sends up to 13.3 MGD of treated surface water to Vacaville.

Project
gn of new granular media filters at an
surface water treatment plant. Up to three
ing designed to replace filtration capacity
hen existing 1980s era diatomaceous earth
ed from service and demolished. Filters
ed to accommodate multiple media types
ns that are being piloted to substantiate
ates at levels greater than 6 gpm/SF, and
he filters to provide adequate polisl'i'ng of
aterials ahead of final disinfection. Project
e an extremely constrained site for which
illbe required to avoid undermining and/or
ential settlement in nearby structures Upon
ew filters, existing granular media ?lters w'll
match new media configuration
Project
was hired to evaluate and ultimately design improvements related to the optimization of water treatment plant operations to improve management of DBPformationpotential from Markleevi||e's surfacewater supply, recon?guration of existing booster pump stations to alleviatewater age issues and increase reliabilty during power outages; replacement of aging transmission and distributionpiping; and installaton of new serv ce meters Design and construction of this project is being conducted under planningand construction grants, respectively, administered by the DrinkingWater State RevolvingFund.Andy’ responsibilitiesalso includecoordinationofsurvey, geotechnical and environmental documentation services.

Pre-DesignTaskLeadand Assistant Pro
gra m Manager for a project to de?ne and manage implementatio n of a $278millionproject to delivera new treated surfacewat er supply to serve the Cities of Turlockand Ceres. West Vost was selected ‘n 2016 to manage development of a regional SurfaceWater Supply Project that willinclude raw water
conveyance facilities,a treatment plant, and treated water transmission mains to bring water to each City's distribution system. Andy's preconstruction responsibilitiesincluded source water qual ty characterization, evaluation oftreatmen t
process alternatives, planning forthe development of and testing of an existing in?ltration gallery facility,design of pumping and distribution facilities, coordination of geotech nical
investigations, coordination of right-of-way services, enginee ring
support ofSRWA'senvironmental consultant, permitting an d utilities coordination, construction cost estimating, bidabilit y
and constructability reviews, preparation of life-cyclecost evaluations, and development of detailed technical procure ment
documents for the solicitationand evaluation of design-build proposals. Andy's responsibilitiesduring the design-build period includeoverall coordination of design deliverable reviews, review of key equipment and materialsubmittals, weekly coordination with on-site CM and resident engineers, and planning for commissioning and acceptance testing, which is expected to occur in 2023.

Staff Engineer for th
e development of a master plan for the phased upgrade and expansion of the City of Ga|t‘s (City) existing 3 mgd WWTP to 6 mgd. Facility improvement alternatives include new primary treatment, expansion of existing secondary and tertiary processes, solids digestion, mechanical dewatering facilities and upgrade and expansion of existing personnel buildings.

Responsibilities include condition assessments and capacity analyses of existing facilities, development of a hydraulic profile, predesign and site layout of new facilitiesand development of detailed construction and life cycle project cost estimates for all alternatives.

Engineer for desi
existing 20 MGD
new filters are be
that will be lost w
filters are remov
are being design
1) filter loading r 2) the ability oft DBPprecursor m challenges includ vertical shoring w promoting differ construction of n be retro?tted to Program for and Design Services Surface
Water S
up
pl
y
Stanislaus Regional Authority Water Proie
ct, (SRWA), CA:

NorthRegi Plant Laboratory WaVerTrearmen
1onal Impr ovem
ent
of Fairfield and Vucaville, CitiesA: Proiect,
Water and Planning Improvements Proiecf,
Mark
leevil
le
Waler Markleeville, Company, CA:

Sum
mit
Plan! Filier Wa Treutmenl Futility Design,
ler San Valley Riafo, Water Company, CA:

WaterPlant TAlternatives of Evaluation, City
re
at
Vuza
ville,
CA:

Fa
cil
iti es
of Master Plan, Gall CityA:

YO
ST
An
dy
SPageE2I
mi
th,
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 258 of 282 ends

‘Fmothy Banyai is a registered civilengineer with experie nce man and designing agin
g
water and wastewater treatment plants and pumping st
at
io
ns
.
has served asTim
project manager, lead project engineer, technical adviso r
qualit control reviewer
y As a manager, Tim maintains direct client contact, provi des
leadership, pro team
jec
t
and coordinates among disciplinesto ensure successful comple direct His tion. project experience includes design and preparation of d ra
and specification
s, assisting clients in bidding-phase services, and performin g
coduties
ns
tr
uc
ti
on
-ph
as
e
Tim has a strong record of developing cost-effective and designs for water and wastewater treatment plant projects, and is for multianaging disciplinary teams for water and sewer infrastructure im pr ov
em
en
t
also projects. He
has direct experience as an operator and laboratory tec hni
cia n
for awastewater
treatment plant where he conducted laboratory analysi
s,
hdevelop and
e
l
p
ed
implement a facilitiesplan study for nitrogen control, p er
fo
rm
ed
pilot and studies,
developed bench scale models Tim's experience as a trea tm
en
t
plant operator
provides ins'ghts he incorporates into the design for suc ces
sfu
l
constru phase
ction sequencing, testing and start up, and operations and m ai
nt en
an
ce
.
also has 11m
experiencing preparing State Revo ving Fund (SRF)appli
catio
ns
and managing SRF
funded projects.

Project E
n
gi n
e
er
for Pump The Station Desg. of City Sacramento
completed an effort to re?n
e
tassetpproach via plnning. strategic management
h
ei
r
As part of this project, Westcomp amultidisciplinary condition assessment leted of five wastewater and five stations. The condition sump assessment evaluated the existing assetsat the sations via method that asumpcoring fed into a facility risk assessment. T
h
e
used scthe condition and infacility assessment or
in
g
risk assessment was then in
co
rp
o
ra
ted
afor lng-term into strategy for planning
budgeting, rehabilitation an
d
reand with replacing comply regulations assets to
p
ai
r,
and maintain public health safe
ty.

Professionai CivilEngineer,
CaliforniaNo 60715,
Kansas No 14119 (inactive)
MS, Environmental Engineering,
North Dakota State University
BS, CivilEngineering,
North Dakota State University
Tau Association Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society Water Environment Federation Project managed Manager. 1'irn
the design ithat would add flexibility tohe activated sludge return m pr ov
em
en
ts
system. Th
is
ipiping modifications that allowed befor conveyed RAS tohe n c
lu
d
ed
aeration b
as
in
s. WE
ST
Y
O
ST
Water
. E
n
gi
n
e
er
Ti
m
ot
h
y
Banyai PE
,
Pumping stations
Water booster statio
ns WWTP hydraulics
Headworks
Primary treatment
Aeration systems
Wasl ewav
er
and Facilities Drainage Stalions Slulion Condition Sump Assessment, Sacra
menl
o,
CA:

EX
PESenon
dnry RIE
NC
E
Clarif Napu Sanitation District, CA:
ier,
Trickling filters
Secondary clari?ers
Disinfection
Solids thickening
Digestion
and Wasiewate Treatment
r

STAFF TIYLE

YEARS OF E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E.

PROFESSION
AL
REG
IST
RAT
ION
S
W
at er
and Experience and Waslewul Expertise: er
P
R
O
F
E
S
SI
O
N
A
L

AFFILIATIONS
Engine
ering
Mana I
ger
30 Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 259 of 282 ends

mu
m
Condition Assessment Lead and Project Manager ‘Fm led
the multi-disciplinecondition assessment of the Weese
Direct Filtration Water Treatment Plant and the Mission Basin Groundwater Purification Plant that uses reverse osmosis to treat brackish groundwater. The Weese Plant is a 25 mgd facility and the Mission Basin Plant is a 6.4 mgd facility.

The primary objectives of the project were to use asset management principles to make risk-based informed decision to develop a prioritize capital improvement plan for the next 20 years In addition to the capital improvement plan, the City ooked to reduce 0&M, increase reliability, plan for future regulatory requirements and increase automation, optimize performance and lower energy costs. A detailed work plan as developed to conduct the field work that identified assets to be assessed, scoring criteria, methods to conduct the assessments and responsibilities of all parties. Followingthe e d condition assessment field work, a comprehensive
ri sed assessment was completed to rank and prioritize
c Iprojects into four time windows: immediate, 2 to 5
cts. The City's San LuisRey Water Reclamation Plant WRF) wastewater treatment plant was evaluated The RFhas a capacity of 13.5 mgd and treats a majority of City's wastewater. West Yost completed a Preliminary ign Report (FDR)that included a high-level condit on essment Detailed evaluations and condition assessments re developed for the headworks facilities, ?ow and load ua zation facilities, primary and secondary facilit es and lidstreatment. Eachof the detailed analyses included a ndition assessment and development of life cycle costs with focus on reducing energy use and chemical costs. Following e FDR,West Yost assisted the City in developing a phased pproach to implementing the improvements to best use the oney available. The first phase includes the follow rig major terns — headworks improvements with two new screens, new conveyor and washer compactors, new grit removal using the Headcelltechnology, odor control improvements and consolidation of the primary and secondary electrical fac Ities into a common electrical building. The estimated construct on cost for Phase 1 items is approximately $12M.

Construction sequencing Condition assessment
Master planning SRFapplications
The California cities of Belmont, Folsom
Foster City, Hayward, Hercules, Lompoc, Modesto, Pinole, Salinas, San Jose, San Leandro, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Rosa, and Ukiah;the County of San Mateo; specia
districts including Contra Costa CleanWater Program
(Richmond), Contra Costa Water District, Dublin San Ramon Services District (Dublin), Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District (San Rafael), Livermore-AmadorValley Water Management
Agency, McKin|eyville Community Services District,
, Orange County Sanitation District, Oro
Loma Sanitary District (San Lorenzo), RossValley Sanitary District, Sacramento Area Sewer District, Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (Regional San), Silicon Valley Clean Water (Redwood City), South Tahoe Public Utility District, and Union Sanitary District (Union City): and U.S.service branches including the Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force.

Project Engineer esign for the replacement of the Larry Way Sewer on (5016), and decommission ng of the Don Julio rd LiftStation (5015). The pro)ect requires upsizing facilities.The existing rated capacty for 5016 was on gallons per day (mgd) and was upsized to 8 5 mgd. ments at S016 include three new 70-horsepower ersible pumps, a circular concrete wet well, a standby lgenerator, provisions for the future installation of or control scrubber, and upsizing the primary power. truction sequencing is a major design criterion, as the ing S016 facility must remain in continuous serv'ce to ize disruptions to the public. The 5015 facility willbe mmissioned and existing f ows routed to the upsized facility. roject Engineer. The City of Carlsbadowns and operates astewater liftstations that receive and de ver sanitary ge to the EncinaWastewater Authority for treatment isposal. As part of its asset management initiat ve lity infrastructure, the City is performing condition ment of its lift stations and develop ng business sses to identify improvements to its liftstations. ‘Fm mplete a visual assessment of 11 ft stations in Apr .The assessment will civil/site, mechanical, structural, rical, and instrumentation and controls disciplines. Based e assessment, recommendations for mprovements w I ade. stations and also performed coonassessment the
nd
iti on
City's Wastewater Treatmen
t
PThe information collected
l
an
t.
during the condition assessm
ent
used was identify repairs to
and upgrades at each of theConceptua level capital
l costs were also developed fthrepair and upgrades.
se The projects were then ran
ked
anplaced of into one d three categories for develo
pment
of capital improvement a
program. Projects were ran
ked
asimmend near—term,
diate, long-term categories.

WaterPlant TFacility and Wastewuter
re
at
Treat
ment
Plant of Upgrades, City Oceanside, CA: Muior
Water aPlantnd Wusfe Treatment Water
wuter n
d Distr
ibuvi an
Masler of Yubu Plans, System CityA:,
Don Relief Avenue Sewer Proiect, Sacramento
Area District, Sacramento, CA:
for the d
LiftStati
Bouleva

4.0 milli Improve ansubm diesead Cons exist SO16 minim deco d taile
sk-ba
proje SLRW Des‘ (SLR ass close the eq Ii
LiftS
ta
tio
n
Asset of Managemenl Cityarlsbad, Program,
CA:

P
11 w
and d of uti assess proce will ca 2022 onelectth be m
Ti m
pecondition onf the lift six City's assesments
rfor m
ed
YOS
T
T
i
|Page Banvai, PE2
S
an
ita
tio
n
District C
li
e
nt
s
inclu
de:

Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 260 of 282 ends

WE
WE
WE

WE ARE WEST YOST
W S

SUPPORT
lYO'T

OUR COMMUNITIES

ARE WATER FOCUSED

TAKE PRIDE IN WHAT WE DO

E STRIVETO BECOME OUR BEST

T DO WHAT'S RIGHT

E BELIEVEIN QUALITY
LISTEN

E SOLVE CHALLENGING PROBLEMS

E SEE THE BIGGER PICTURE

STAKE OWNERSHIP

HAVE FUN
ET "
S Water. Eng
ine
ere
d.

Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 261 of 282 ends

Class A, C33 CSLB License #724233 Registered DIR Public Works Contractor #1000003275 2120 WARM SPRINGS COURT FREMONT, CALIFORNIA 94539 | P: 510.770.0202 | E: [email protected] 1 April 5, 2023
Chris Laymon
City of St. Helena
1480 Main St.

St. Helena, Ca. 94574
QUOTE #: SHC040523-3Q
PHONE #: 707-312-1205
EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]
Dear Chris:

ERS is pleased to submit its proposal for our Filter Surveillance services for four (8) pressure vessel filters located in St. Helena, Ca.

Scope of Supply for (8) pressure vessel filters:
o Written report documenting the following items.
• Core filter, gravel profile, and general observations. • Sieve analysis of filter sand and anthracite.
• Flock Retention analysis.
• Interior and exterior coatings condition.
• Tank shell condition.

Clarifications:
• Filter to be drained and dirty prior to arrival of crew. • Quote is based on (4) filters per day.

Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 262 of 282 ends

Class A, C33 CSLB License #724233 Registered DIR Public Works Contractor #1000003275 2120 WARM SPRINGS COURT FREMONT, CALIFORNIA 94539 | P: 510.770.0202 | E: [email protected] 2 Standard Provisions:

1. Qualified manpower:
a. Onsite Supervisor/Environmental Technician/Hole Watch. b. Certifications in Forklift/Reach Lift, Crane Operator, Confined Space & Rescue, and First Aid/CPR/AED.

2. Equipment and PPE:
a. High-power industrial vacuum system.
b. Ventilation fan for air circulation.
c. Four gas monitors for pre-entry and continuous LEL testing. d. Air-purifying respirators (supplied air respirators available if required).

3. Safety Regulations:
a. Confined Space:
i. Tripod/winch for emergency evacuation.
ii. Fall arrest harnesses with safety lanyards for all men. iii. Permit-required confined space entry permits as applicable. iv. Daily monitoring log.
b. 2-Way radios for communication with in-tank personnel. c. Cellular phone as an emergency response tool

4. New media as follows:
a. None
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 263 of 282 ends

Class A, C33 CSLB License #724233 Registered DIR Public Works Contractor #1000003275 2120 WARM SPRINGS COURT FREMONT, CALIFORNIA 94539 | P: 510.770.0202 | E: [email protected] 3 PRICING: $13,500

Quote Valid for 30 days.

Our time and materials work are billed at $246.00 per man-hour, straight time, plus materials with a 25% margin. Price includes all applicable sales tax.

Please feel free to contact me should you need further information or any clarification. My contact information is: phone – cell (510) 552-3285; office (510) 770-0202; email – [email protected] If quote is accepted, please answer questions below, sign and return to [email protected] Sincerely,
Nik Radonich
Sales/Engineering Manager
Is this project subject to PREVAILING WAGE? Yes ☐ No ☐
Is this project deemed PUBLIC WORK and therefore subject to the rules and regulations of the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)? Yes ☐ No ☐ If the answers are “NO”, please mark as such and refer to the paragraph at the end of this document PO or Contract #
DIR Project #

Authorized Representative — Name & Signature Title

(hereinafter “Contracting Party") has represented in writing and to ERS and does hereby reaffirm in writing toERS(hereinafter “Contractor") thatneitherthe project which isthe subject matter ofthisAgreement northe requested work tobeperformed on theproject byContractor are “public work”asdefined by federal law, Chapter 1, Part 7 of Division 2 of the California Labor Code (governing “Public Works and Public Agencies"), or any other federal, state or local statute, ordinance, regulation, or administrative and/or judicial decision. Based on the foregoing representation, Contractor has calculated its bid for the subject project based on certain wage rates and benefits. Contracting Party will specifically verify, prior to allowing Contractor to submit a proposal on the project or work to be performed on the project, that project is not deemed to be a public works project and that there are no requirements for prevailing wages or other unique bid requirements. In the event that Contracting Party has made any misrepresentation regarding the foregoing whether intentionally or negligently, Contracting Party specifically agrees to indemnify, reimburse, and hold Contractor harmless from and against any and all claims, penalties, fines or assessments that may arise from Contracting Party’s failure to properly report and describe the project to Contractor. Contracting Party shall reimburse any and all attorney’s fees and all costs associated with defending or enforcing this projection to Contractor Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 264 of 282 ends

Class A, C33 CSLB License #724233 Registered DIR Public Works Contractor #1000003275 2120 WARM SPRINGS COURT FREMONT, CALIFORNIA 94539 | P: 510.770.0202 | E: [email protected] 1 April 8, 2023
Chris Laymon
City of St. Helena
1480 Main St.

St. Helena, Ca. 94574
QUOTE #: SHC040523-1Q
PHONE #: 707-312-1205
EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]
Dear Chris:

ERS is pleased to submit its proposal for our Filter Surveillance services for two (2) one cell Gravity filters located at the Luis Estralla Plant in St. Helena.

Scope of Supply for (2) gravity filters:
o Written report documenting the following items.
• Core filter, gravel profile, and general observations. • Sieve analysis of filter sand and anthracite.
• Floc retention.
• Backwash turbidity analysis.
• Digital backwash expansion metering.
• Inspection of coatings on concrete and steel.

Clarifications:
• Filter to be drained and dirty prior to arrival of crew. • Quote is based on (2) filters per day
Price does not include bonding
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 265 of 282 ends

Class A, C33 CSLB License #724233 Registered DIR Public Works Contractor #1000003275 2120 WARM SPRINGS COURT FREMONT, CALIFORNIA 94539 | P: 510.770.0202 | E: [email protected] 2 Standard Provisions:

1. Qualified manpower:
a. Onsite Supervisor/Environmental Technician/Hole Watch b. Certifications in Forklift/Reach Lift, Crane Operator, Confined Space & Rescue, and First Aid/CPR/AED

2. Equipment and PPE:
a. High-power industrial vacuum system
b. Ventilation fan for air circulation
c. Four gas monitors for pre-entry and continuous LEL testing d. Air-purifying respirators (supplied air respirators available if required)

3. Safety Regulations:
a. Confined Space:
i. Tripod/winch for emergency evacuation
ii. Fall arrest harnesses with safety lanyards for all men iii. Permit-required confined space entry permits as applicable iv. Daily monitoring log
b. 2-Way radios for communication with in-tank personnel c. Cellular phone as an emergency response tool

4. New media as follows:
a. None
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 266 of 282 ends

Class A, C33 CSLB License #724233 Registered DIR Public Works Contractor #1000003275 2120 WARM SPRINGS COURT FREMONT, CALIFORNIA 94539 | P: 510.770.0202 | E: [email protected] 3 PRICING: $7,570.00

Quote Valid for 30 days
Our time and materials work are billed at $246.00 per man-hour, straight time, plus materials with a 25% margin. Price includes all applicable sales tax.

Authorized Representative — Name & Signature Title

Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 267 of 282 ends

Marine Industrial Tank Inc
3324 Kee Ln
Modesto, Ca, 95355
Office: (209) 382-9155
Fax: (408) 707-1490
Invoice
Invoice Date: Aug 4, 2023
Invoice Number : 383
PO#
BILL TO:

ST. HELENA, CITY OF
1480 Main Street
ST. HELENA, CA, 94574
SEND TO:

Marine Industrial Tank Inc
3324 Kee Ln
Modesto, Ca, 95355
Account Name:ST. HELENA, CITY OF StatusCreated
Due Date:Sep 1, 2023 Sales Order:

S.No.Product Details Quantity List Price Total

1. water tank cleaning & Inspection 4 $ 3,800.00 $ 15,200.00 Sub Total $ 15,200.00
Tax $ 0.00
Adjustment $ 0.00
Grand Total $ 15,200.00
Work Completed
Water tank cleaning and inspection of WTP 1.4 MG Concrete, 200kg clearwell and inspection of 1.4MG Steel Welded.

Terms and Conditions
Net 30 Days. 2.5% interest per month on all accounts past 30 days. Proposal does not include Sales or Use Taxes, Registration fees, or licenses unless listed above in proposal. If MIT Diving & Coating is liable for any additional fees requested or required by the customer and are not noted in proposal, the fees will be billed on the final invoice.

Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 268 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
CITY OF ST. HELENA
1480 Main Street, St. Helena, CA 94574

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT
Job Name: W24-09 WTP Tanks Relining
Agreement No. PW W24-09
DATE: 08/30/2023

1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR:

Marine Industrial Tank Inc 3324 Kee Ln Modesto CA, 95355 Office: (209) 382-9155
Mobile: (209) 702-1233
[email protected]

SCOPE OF THE WORK
See Scope of Work attached as Appendix A. [To include drawings, technical specifications, etc.]

2. COMPENSATION FOR WORK. Contractor’s total compensation for the Work performed under this Agreement (Contract Sum) is as follows:
$787,967.90 1.4mg 104'd X 22'h On-Grade Concrete Water Tank $158,892.50 Clearwell Tank Relining
$946,860.40 Total Not to Exceed Cost

3. to be paid as (check one): (1) X lump sum; (2)  lump sum with progress payments; (3)  per attached schedule of rates and charges, up to a guaranteed not-to-exceed amount of $ $946,860.40. All payments (check one): X shall  shall not be subject to a five percent (5%) retention.

4. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE WORK. Contractor shall commence and complete the Work by the following dates:

Commencement Date shall be on the date established in the Notice to Proceed. Owner reserves the right to modify or alter the Commencement Date of the Work.

Substantial Completion Date: Within 30 calendar days of Commencement Date.

Final Completion Date: Within 60 calendar days of Substantial Completion.

4.01 Liquidated Damage Amounts.

A. As liquidated damages for delay Contractor shall pay Owner Five Hundred dollars ($500.00) for each Day that expires after the time specified herein for Contractor to achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work, until achieved.

B. As liquidated damages for delay Contractor shall pay Owner Five Hundred dollars ($500.00) for each Day that expires after the time specified herein for Contractor to achieve Final Completion of the entire Work, until achieved.

4.02 Scope of Liquidated Damages
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 269 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
A. Contractor and Owner agree that because of the nature of the Project, it would be impractical or extremely difficult to fix the amount of such actual damages incurred by Owner because of a delay in completion of all or any part of the Work. Contractor and Owner agree that specified measures of liquidated damages shall be presumed to be the amount of such damages actually sustained by Owner, and that because of the nature of the Project, it would be impracticable or extremely difficult to fix the actual damages.

B. Liquidated damages for delay shall cover administrative, overhead, interest on bonds, and general loss of public use damages suffered by Owner as a result of delay. Liquidated damages shall not cover the cost of completion of the Work, damages resulting from Defective Work, lost revenues or costs of substitute facilities, or damages suffered by others who then seek to recover their damages from Owner (for example, delay claims of other contractors, subcontractors, tenants, or other third-parties), and defense costs thereof. Owner may deduct from any money due or to become due to Contractor subsequent to time for completion of entire Work and extensions of time allowed pursuant to provisions hereof, a sum representing then-accrued liquidated damages.

5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

5.01 Contractor shall perform the Work in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the following attachments (together, Contract Documents):

A. Appendix A – Scope of Work
B. Appendix B – General Conditions
C. Appendix C – Insurance
D. Appendix D – Construction Performance Bond
E. Appendix E – Construction Labor and Materials Payment Bond

5.02 The Contract Documents are the sole and exclusive provisions that govern the Work described herein. Any provision contained in any purchase order issued in connection with this Agreement or the Work described herein shall be null and void and shall have no force or effect.

5.03 Agreement number must appear on all invoices and correspondence. Send invoices in duplicate immediately upon performance of Work ordered hereon to:

City of St. Helena, 1088 College Avenue, St. Helena, CA 94574 and via email to [email protected]
CONTRACTOR: OWNER: City of St. Helena
_____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Signature Signature
_____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Print Name & Title Anil Comelo, City Manager
_____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Date Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Ethan Walsh, City Attorney
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 270 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
Appendix A to Construction Services Agreement

SCOPE OF WORK

1.4MG 104'D x 22'H ON-GRADE CONCRETE WATER TANK
Removing the sediment from interior ceiling, walls and floor.

Resurfacing and relining tank interior floors and walls and ceiling with ANSI/NSF 61.

This will be for the complete interior preparations and relining of one 1.4MG concrete tank. •Safety - Confined Space, Constant Atmospheric Air/Gas Monitoring, Fall protection, and OSHA 30 trained work crew, NACE Level 2
•Provide entry permit, testing and gas monitoring of atmosphere in tank as required for the safety of crew on the interior at all times.
•Provide scaffold to access the complete interior of tank. •Provide all needed oil-free, Air compressors- Verify oil free air- by way of “Blotter Test”. •Blasters to wear proper PPE- Ear Plugs, Fresh Air supplied Blast Helmets, Coveralls, Chaps ,Fall protection (Harness, Lanyard and Lifeline), leather blast glove
•Provide Abrasive-blast, using Kleen-Blast 16/30 grit-or Garnet to achieve, a 3-4 mil profile near white blast as required by coating manufacturer. SSPC SP-10.
•Verify results of anchor pattern/profile, by use of Testex Press-O-Film Replica Tape and a Surface profile comparator. (X-course).

Total includes removing the sediment from interior ceiling, walls and floor. Resurfacing and relining tank interior floors and walls and ceiling
All workmanship and materials will meet or exceed the American water works association. D- 102-10 standards for tank coatings.

All workmanship will be guaranteed for a two-year period from the date of completion.

Conditions of Re-coating Rates
Marine Industrial Tank Inc will clean up area and remove all materials, equipment and trash upon completion, maintaining an orderly and clean work area daily and throughout the project. Any Fabrication needed that is not listed above will be added as a second line item if needed. Total does not include any hazardous lead paint abatement or a temporary water system if needed.

DESCRIPTION ANSI/NSF 61 approved for direct contact with potable water. It is a fast setting, rapid curing, 100% solids, flexible, aromatic, two component spray polyurea that can be applied to suitably prepared concrete and metal surfaces. Its extremely fast gel time makes it suitable for applications down to -20°F. It may be applied in single or multiple applications without appreciable sagging and is relatively insensitive to moisture and temperature allowing application in most temperatures. Polyeuro® 5502-PW offers a tack free time of less than forty- five seconds and exhibits 450% elongation upon curing with 50 Shore D hardness.

FEATURES
•ANSI/NSF 61 Approved for Potable Water
• Zero VOC (100% Solids)
• Seamless
• Excellent Thermal Stability Odorless
• Low Temperature Flexibility Meets USDA Criteria
• Good Chemical Resistance No Toxic Vapors
• Coat Pipe 9” In Diameter or Greater
• Suitable for 5 Gallon Tanks and Larger
•Coats Carbon or Mild Steel Metals without Primer Installed With or Without Reinforcement in Transitional Areas Total: $787,967.90
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 271 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018

WTP CONCRETE CLEARWELL FIVE CHAMBER WATER TANK CLEANING, RESURFACING AND RELINING This will be for the complete interior preparations and relining of one 55kg concrete tank. •Safety - Confined Space, Constant Atmospheric Air/Gas Monitoring, Fall protection, and OSHA 30 trained work crew, NACE Level 2
•Provide entry permit, testing and gas monitoring of atmosphere in tank as required for the safety of crew on the interior at all times.
•Provide scaffold to access complete interior of tank.
•Provide all needed oil-free, Air compressors- Verify oil free air- by way of “Blotter Test”. •Blasters to wear proper PPE- Ear Plugs, Fresh Air supplied Blast Helmets, Coveralls, Chaps, Fall protection (Harness, Lanyard and Lifeline), leather blast glove
•Provide Abrasive-blast, using Kleen-Blast 16/30 grit-or Garnet to achieve, a 3-4 mil profile near white blast as required by coating manufacturer. SSPC SP-10.
•Verify results of anchor pattern/profile, by use of Testex Press-O-Film Replica Tape and a Surface profile comparator. (X-course).

Total includes removing the sediment from interior ceiling, walls and floor. Resurfacing and relining tank interior floors and walls and ceiling.

All workmanship and materials will meet or exceed the American water works association. D- 102-10 standards for tank coatings.

All workmanship will be guaranteed for a two-year period from the date of completion.

FEATURES
• ANSI/NSF 61 Approved for Potable Water
• Zero VOC (100% Solids)
• Seamless
• Excellent Thermal Stability Odorless
• Low Temperature Flexibility Meets USDA Criteria
• Good Chemical Resistance No Toxic Vapors• Coat Pipe 9” In Diameter or Greater • Suitable for 5 Gallon Tanks and Larger
• Coats Carbon or Mild Steel Metals without Primer Installed With or Without Reinforcement in Transitional Areas

TYPICAL USES
Potable Water Tanks - Concrete or Metal
Total: $158,892.50
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 272 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
Appendix B to Construction Services Agreement

GENERAL CONDITIONS
ARTICLE 1 TERMS OF PERFORMANCE

1.01 Construction Services Agreement (Agreement) Force and Effect. The provisions of the Agreement and other Contract Documents constitute the entire agreement between the Contractor and Owner regarding the Work described herein. No representation, term or covenant not expressly specified in the Contract Documents shall, whether oral or written, be a part of this agreement. The Agreement and other Contract Documents shall govern the Work described herein (whenever performed), and shall supersede all other purchase orders and agreements between Contractor and Owner, and any proposal, with respect to the Work described herein.

1.02 No Modification or Waiver. The Contract Documents may not be modified, nor may compliance with any of its terms be waived, except by written instrument executed and approved by fully authorized representatives of Owner and Contractor. Contract Documents headings are for convenience only and do not affect the construction of the Contract Documents.

1.03 Performance of Work/No Assignment. Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work. Contractor will perform the Work in a skillful and workmanlike manner; comply fully with criteria established by Owner, and with applicable laws, codes, and all applicable industry standards. Contractor shall maintain its work area in a clean and sanitary condition, clear debris and trash at the end of each work day, and shall not damage or disrupt any property unless specifically part of the scope of the Agreement. Contractor shall not contract any portion of the Work or otherwise assign the Agreement without prior written approval of Owner. (Contractor shall remain responsible for compliance with all terms of the Contract Documents, regardless of the terms of any such assignment.) The Contractor shall permit Owner (or its designees) access to the work area, Contractor’s shop, or any other facility, to permit inspection of the Work at all times during construction and/or manufacture and fabrication. The granting of any progress payment, and any inspections, reviews, approvals or oral statements by any Owner representative, or certification by any governmental entity, shall in no way limit Contractor’s obligations under the Contract Documents. Either party’s waiver of any breach, or the omission or failure of either party, at any time, to enforce any right reserved to it, or to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract Documents, shall not be a waiver of any other right to which any party is entitled, and shall not in any way affect, limit, modify or waive that party’s right thereafter to enforce or compel strict compliance with every provision hereof. Owner shall have, at all times, set-off rights with respect to any payment and Contractor’s failure to perform the terms of the Contract Documents.

ARTICLE 2 LEGAL AND MISCELLANEOUS

2.00 Records and Payment Requests. Contractor shall submit all billings with all necessary invoices or other appropriate evidence of proper performance, after which Owner shall make payment within thirty (30) days. Each billing furnished shall include the current billing amount, the cumulative contract amount, and the amount remaining in the contract. Upon Owner’s written request, Contractor shall make available to Owner, its authorized agents, officers, or employees, any and all ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, cancelled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to the Work or the expenditures and disbursement charged to Owner, and all correspondence, internal memoranda, calculations, books and accounts, records documenting its Work under the Agreement, and invoices, payrolls, timecards, records and all other data related to matters covered by the Agreement. Contractor shall furnish to Owner, its authorized agents, officers, or employees, such other evidence or information as Owner may require with regard to the Work or any such expenditure or disbursement charged by Contractor. Contractor shall maintain all such documents and records prepared by or furnished to Contractor during the course of performing the Work for at least five years following completion of the Work, except that all such items pertaining to hazardous materials shall be maintained for at least thirty (30) years. Contractor shall permit Owner to audit, examine and make copies, excerpts and transcripts from such records. The State of California or any federal agency having an interest in the subject of the Agreement shall have the same rights conferred to Owner by this section. Such rights shall be specifically enforceable.

2.01 Independent Contractor. Contractor is an independent Contractor and does not act as Owner’s agent in any capacity, whatsoever. Contractor is not entitled to any benefits that Owner provides to Owner employees including, without limitation, insurance, worker’s compensation benefits or payments, pension benefits, health benefits or insurance benefits. Terms within the Contract Documents regarding directives apply to and concern the result of the Contractor’s provision of Work not the means, methods, or scheduling of the Contractor’s Work.

Contractor shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures with respect to its provision of Work under the Contract Documents. Contractor shall pay all payroll taxes imposed by Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 273 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
any governmental entity and will pay all other taxes not specifically identified in the Contract Documents as Owner’s responsibility.

2.02 Indemnity/Liability. Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Owner and each of its officers, directors, representatives, agents and employees, against all claims, suits, actions, loss, cost, damage, expense, and liability arising from or related to bodily injury to or death of any person or damage to any property, or resulting from any breach and/or Contractor’s negligence in performing the Work pursuant to the Contract Documents. Notwithstanding any provision of the Contract Documents, Owner shall not be liable to Contractor or anyone claiming under it, in contract or tort, for any special, consequential, indirect or incidental damages arising out of or in connection with the Contract Documents or the Work. Owner’s rights and remedies, whether under the Agreement or other applicable law, shall be cumulative and not subject to limitation.

2.03 Defective Work; Warranties. Contractor warrants that all construction services shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional standards of good and sound construction practices, all Contract Documents requirements, and all laws, codes, standards, licenses, and permits. Contractor warrants that all materials and equipment shall be new, of suitable grade of their respective kinds for their intended uses, and free from defects. Contractor hereby grants to Owner for a period of one year following the date of completion its unconditional warranty of the quality and adequacy of all of the Work including, without limitation, all labor, materials and equipment provided by Contractor and its Subcontractors of all tiers. If either prior to completion of the Work, or within one year after completion, any Work (completed or incomplete) is found to violate any of the foregoing warranties (Defective Work), Contractor shall promptly, without cost to Owner and in accordance with Owner’s written instructions, correct, remove and replace the Defective Work with conforming Work, and correct, remove and replace any damage to other Work or other property resulting therefrom. If Contractor fails to do so, Contractor shall pay all of the Owner’s resulting claims, costs, losses and damages. Where Contractor fails to correct Defective Work, or defects are discovered outside the correction period, Owner shall have all rights and remedies granted by law.

2.04 Conflicts of Interest and Anti-Fraud and Anti-Corruption Policies A. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

B. City understands and acknowledges that Consultant is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is aware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

C. Consultant understands and acknowledges City maintains an anti-fraud and anti-corruption policy to protect the City, its operations, and its employees from and against financial risks, operational breaches, and unethical, fraudulent and corrupt activities. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant, its subcontractor(s) / subconsultant(s) and their respective employees providing services pursuant to the Agreement are (1) in good standing; (2) have not been previously investigated, convicted, or debarred for fraudulent or corrupt activities; (3) will not participate in fraudulent or corrupt activities, and (4) will take steps to ensure that its employees and subcontractor(s) / subconsultant(s) employees do not participate in any fraudulent or corrupt activities. Consultant acknowledges and agrees further that it has a duty to and will report to City any information or incident(s) about possible fraudulent or corrupt activities Consultant may discover, and will cooperate in any fraud or corruption investigation conducted, with respect to Consultant’s service provided pursuant to this Agreement.

2.06 Termination; Suspension; Disputes. Owner may direct Contractor to terminate, suspend, delay, interrupt or accelerate Work, in whole or in part, for such periods of time as Owner may determine in its sole discretion.

Owner will issue such directives in writing, and may do so, in whole or in part, for its convenience or due to Contractor’s fault. Owner will compensate Contractor for extra costs resulting from such directives only to the extent that Owner issues such directives for its convenience and not due to Contractor’s fault (but Owner shall not compensate Contractor for costs, profit or overhead anticipated to be earned or incurred on Work terminated for Owner’s convenience.) Contractor shall continue its Work throughout the course of any dispute, and Contractor’s failure to continue Work during a dispute shall be a material breach of the Contract Documents. All claims by Contractor against Owner shall be submitted in writing to Owner, and shall be governed by Public Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 274 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
Contract Code Sections 20104 – 20104.6, after which time the one year time period in Government Code Section 911.2 shall be, pursuant to Government Code Section 930.2, reduced to 90 days. Should Contractor be terminated for default, and such termination is subsequently determined to be wrongful, such termination will be converted to a termination for convenience as provided herein.

2.07 Execution; Venue; Limitations. The Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed in Napa County, California. Enforcement of the Contract Documents shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflict of laws rules. Except as expressly provided in the Contract Documents, nothing in the Contract Documents shall operate to confer rights or benefits on persons or entities not party to the Agreement.

As between the parties to the Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations for any act or failure to act shall commence to run on the date of Owner’s issuance of the final Certificate for Payment, or termination of the Contract Documents, whichever is earlier, except for latent defects, for which the statute of limitation shall begin running upon discovery of the defect and its cause.

2.08 Employee Wages; Records; Apprentices. Contractor shall pay prevailing wages to its employees on any contract in excess of $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars). Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at Owner’s principal office. Contractor shall comply with the 8-hours per day/40 hours per week/overtime/working hours restrictions for all employees, pursuant to the California Labor Code. Contractor and all subcontractors shall keep and maintain accurate employee payroll records for Work performed under the Agreement. The payroll records shall be certified and submitted as required by law, including Labor Code Section 1771.4 (if applicable) and 1776, including (if the Agreement is awarded on or after April 1, 2015 or continues on or after January 1, 2016) to the Labor Commissioner no less frequently than monthly. Contractor shall comply fully with Labor Code Section 1777.5 in the hiring of apprentices for work relating to the Agreement. If the Agreement exceeds $2,000 and is funded with federal funds, then Contractor shall pay federal Davis Bacon wages and comply with applicable federal requirements.

2.09 Mandatory Contractor and Subcontractor Registration. [Applies if Bid is submitted on or after March 1, 2015 or if Agreement is awarded on or after April 1, 2015] Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771(a), Contractor represents that it and all of its Subcontractors are currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor covenants that any additional or substitute Subcontractors will be similarly registered and qualified.

2.10 Worker’s Compensation. Pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1860 and 1861, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor represents that it is aware of the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700 that require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and Contractor shall comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work.

2.11 Construction Performance Bond; Construction Labor and Materials Payment Bond; Securities in Lieu of Retention Escrow Account.

A. If Contract Sum under the Agreement exceeds (or is expected to exceed) $25,000, Contractor shall provide a construction performance bond in form attached hereto as Appendix D – Construction Performance Bond, and a construction labor and material payment bond, in accordance with Civil Code Section 9550 and in form attached hereto Appendix E – Construction Labor and Materials Payment Bond. Contractor may not substitute cash in lieu of the required bond(s).

B. If the Agreement specifies performance retention, Contractor may elect to substitute securities or direct payment to an escrow account, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300 (incorporated herein by this reference).

2.12 Earthwork and Underground Facilities. If the Work involves digging trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four feet below the surface, Contractor shall notify Owner in writing of any material that Contractor believes may be hazardous waste that is required to be removed in accordance law, subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids, or unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract Documents, pursuant to Section 7104 of the Public Contract Code. For any Work involving trench shoring that costs in excess of $25,000, Contractor shall submit and Owner (or a registered civil or structural engineer employed by Owner) must accept, in advance of excavation, a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation of such trench or trenches, pursuant to Labor Code Section 6705. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer.

Consistent with Government Code Section 4215, as between Owner and Contractor, Owner will be responsible Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 275 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
for the timely removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunk line utility facilities located on the Site only if such utilities are not identified in the Contract Documents or information made available for bidding.

Appendix C to Construction Services Agreement

INSURANCE

1. Commercial General Liability Insurance, written on an “occurrence” basis, which shall provide coverage for bodily injury, death and property damage resulting from operations, liability for slander, false arrest and invasion of privacy, blanket contractual liability, broad form endorsement, and completed operations, personal and advertising liability, with limits of not less than [$2,000,000] each occurrence and [$2,000,000] general aggregate, subject to a deductible of not more than [$1,000] payable by Contractor.

2. Business Automobile Liability Insurance with limits not less than [$2,000,000] each occurrence including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, subject to a deductible of not more than [$1,000] payable by Contractor.

3. Workers’ Compensation Employers’ Liability limits not less than [$2,000,000] each accident, [$2,000,000] per disease and [$2,000,000] aggregate. Contractor’s Workers’ Compensation Insurance policy shall contain a Waiver of Subrogation against the City of St. Helena, its officers, directors, officials, agents, employees and volunteers. In the event Contractor is self-insured, it shall furnish Certificate of Permission to Self-Insure signed by Department of Industrial Relations Administration of Self-Insurance, State of California.

4. Builder’s Risk Insurance including, without limitation, coverage against loss or damage to the Work by fire, lightening, wind, hail, aircraft, riot, vehicle damage, explosion, smoke, falling objects, vandalism, malicious mischief, collapse, and other such hazards as are normally covered by such coverage. Such insurance shall be in amount equal to the replacement cost (without deduction for depreciation and subject to stipulated value in lieu of average clause) of all construction constituting any part of the Work, excluding the cost of excavations, of grading and filling of the land, and except that such insurance may be subject to deductible clauses not to exceed [$10,000] for any one loss. Such insurance will not cover loss or damage to Contractor’s equipment, scaffolding or other materials not to be consumed in the construction of the Work. The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against Owner.

5. Insurance policies in Appendix C shall contain an endorsement containing the following terms:

5.01 City of St. Helena, its officers, directors, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers, shall be named as additional insureds, but only with respect to liability arising out of the activities of the named insured, and there shall be a waiver of subrogation as to each named and additional insured.

5.02 The policies shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the company’s liability.

5.03 Written notice of cancellation, non-renewal or of any material change in the policies shall be mailed to Owner thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date thereof.

5.04 Insurance shall be primary insurance and no other insurance or self-insured retention carried or held by any named or additional insureds other than Contractor shall be called upon to contribute to a loss covered by insurance for the named insured.

6. Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements shall have clearly typed thereon the Project Name, shall clearly describe the coverage and shall contain a provision requiring the mailing of written notices of cancellation described in clause

5.03 above.

7. All policies of insurance shall be placed with insurers acceptable to Owner. The insurance underwriter(s) must be duly licensed to do business in the State of California and (other than for workers’ compensation) must have an A. M.

Best Company rating of [A-,VII] or better. Required minimum amounts of insurance may be increased should conditions of Work, in the opinion of Owner, warrant such increase. Contractor shall increase required insurance amounts upon direction by Owner.

Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 276 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
Appendix D to Construction Services Agreement

CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:

1. THAT WHEREAS, City of St. Helena, a General Law City and municipal corporation of the State of California (Owner) has awarded to Marine Industrial Tank Inc as Principal a Construction Services Agreement dated the 28th day of August, 2023 (Agreement), titled THE W24-09 WTP Tanks Relining PROJECT in the amount of $946,860.40, which Agreement is by this reference made a part hereof, for the work described as follows:
• Removing the sediment from interior ceiling, walls and floor of 1.4 MG tank • Resurfacing and relining tank interior floors and walls and ceiling with ANSI/NSF of 1.4 MG tank • Complete interior preparations and relining of one 55kg concrete tank.

2. AND WHEREAS, Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with the Agreement, guaranteeing the faithful performance thereof;

3. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal and _________________________ as Surety are held and firmly bound unto Owner in the sum of 100% OF THE CONTRACT SUM to be paid to Owner or its successors and assigns; for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

4. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if Principal, or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns approved by Owner, shall promptly and faithfully perform the covenants, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement during the original term and any extensions thereof as may be granted by Owner, with or without notice to Surety, and during the period of any guarantees or warranties required under the Agreement, and shall also promptly and faithfully perform all the covenants, conditions, and agreements of any alteration of the Agreement made as therein provided, notice of which alterations to Surety being hereby waived, on Principal’s part to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless Owner as stipulated in the Agreement, then this obligation shall become and be null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

5. No extension of time, change, alteration, modification, or addition to the Agreement, or of the work required thereunder, shall release or exonerate Surety on this bond or in any way affect the obligation of this bond; and Surety does hereby waive notice of any such extension of time, change, alteration, modification, or addition.

6. Whenever Principal shall be and declared by Owner in default under the Agreement, Surety shall promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly:

6.01 Undertake through its agents or independent contractors, reasonably acceptable to Owner, to complete the Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions and to pay and perform all obligations of Principal under the Agreement including, without limitation, all obligations with respect to warranties, guarantees, indemnities, and the payment of liquidated damages; or

6.02 Obtain a bid or bids for completing the Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions, and, upon determination by Owner of the lowest responsible bidder, reasonably acceptable to Owner, arrange for a contract between such bidder and Owner and make available as work progresses (even though there should be a default or a succession of defaults under the contract or contracts of completion arranged under this paragraph) sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion less the balance of the Contract Sum, and to pay and perform all obligations of Principal under the Agreement including, without limitation, all obligations with respect to warranties, guarantees, and the payment of liquidated damages; but, in any event, Surety’s total obligations hereunder shall not exceed the amount set forth in the third paragraph hereof. The term “balance of the Contract Sum,” as used in this paragraph, shall mean the total amount payable by Owner to the Principal under the Agreement and any amendments thereto, less the amount Owner paid to Principal.

7. Surety’s obligations hereunder are independent of the obligations of any other surety for the performance of the Agreement, and suit may be brought against Surety and such other sureties, jointly and severally, or against any one or more of them, or against less than all of them without impairing Owner’s rights against the others. Surety may not use Contractor to complete the Agreement absent Owner’s written consent.

8. No right of action shall accrue on this bond to or for the use of any person or corporation other than Owner or its successors or assigns.

9. Surety may join in any proceedings brought under the Agreement and shall be bound by any judgment.

Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 277 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018

10. Correspondence or claims relating to this bond shall be sent to Surety at the address set forth below.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this _________ day of ________________, 20___.

CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY
Company: (Corp. Seal) Company: (Corp. Seal)
Signature Signature
Name Name
Title Title
Street Address Street Address
City, State, Zip Code City, State, Zip Code
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 278 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
Appendix E to Construction Services Agreement

CONSTRUCTION LABOR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:

1. THAT WHEREAS, the City of St. Helena, a General Lay and municipal corporation of the State of California (Owner) has awarded to Marine Industrial Tank Inc as Principal a Construction Services Agreement, dated the 28th day of August, 2023 (Agreement), titled THE W24-09 WTP Tanks Relining Project located at 410 Crystal Springs Rd, St.

Helena, CA in the amount of $946,860.40, which Agreement is by this reference made a part hereof, for the work described as follows:
• Removing the sediment from interior ceiling, walls and floor of 1.4 MG tank • Resurfacing and relining tank interior floors and walls and ceiling with ANSI/NSF of 1.4 MG tank • Complete interior preparations and relining of one 55kg concrete tank.

2. AND WHEREAS, Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with the Agreement to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, material suppliers, and other persons as provided by law;

3. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal and ______________________________ as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto Owner in the sum of 100% OF THE CONTRACT SUM ($_________________), for which payment well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

4. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if Principal, or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns approved by Owner, or its subcontractors shall fail to pay any of the persons named in California Civil Code Section 9100, or amounts due under the State of California Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the Agreement, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the State of California Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of Principal and subcontractors pursuant to California Unemployment Insurance Code Section 13020 with respect to such work and labor, that Surety will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees, otherwise the above obligation shall become and be null and void.

5. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons named in California Civil Code Section 9100, as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. The intent of this bond is to comply with the California Mechanic’s Lien Law.

6. Surety, for value received, hereby expressly agrees that no extension of time, change, modification, alteration, or addition to the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement, or to the work to be performed thereunder, shall in any way affect the obligation of this bond; and it does hereby waive notice of any such extension of time, change, modification, alteration, or addition to the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of the Agreement, or to the work to be performed thereunder.

7. Surety’s obligations hereunder are independent of the obligations of any other surety for the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, material suppliers, and other persons in connection with Agreement; and suit may be brought against Surety and such other sureties, jointly and severally, or against any one or more of them, or against less than all of them without impairing Owner’s rights against the other.

8. Correspondence or claims relating to this bond shall be sent to Surety at the address set forth below.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this __________ day of ____________________, 20___.

CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY
Company: (Corp. Seal) Company: (Corp. Seal)
Signature Signature
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 279 of 282 ends

Construction Services Agreement
2018
Name Name
Title Title
Street Address Street Address
City, State, Zip Code City, State, Zip Code
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 280 of 282 ends

Quote
REMIT TO:

Bartley Pump PM LLC
4000 S. Moorland Ave.

Santa Rosa, CA 95407
T 707-584-9191
F 707-584-9198
www.pumpmannorcal.com
DIR# 1000054366
Customer:

RE:

JOBSITE:

NOTE: This quote is for 3 each complete new close coupled turbine 75HP pumps. This does not include the cost to install. HAS NEW MOTORS

QUANT ITEM DESCRIPTION TAXABLE TOTAL
0 0 1500GPM @ 140TDH 1770RPM $ -
2 Each VIT - Short Set Line shaft Turbine Pumps
Wet pit/Open Sump Line shaft Turbine: Open Line shaft, VIT-FFTM 14RJLC, 2 Stages
$ 109,448.50
0 0 Bowl Assembly
14RJLC, 2 Stage(s), Manufacturer's Standard
$ -
0 0 Column Assembly
12" x 1.1875" Threaded W/L Column
$ -
0 0 Head Assembly
12" x 16.50" FF W/L Head, 150 # Flange
$ -
0 0 Coating
Coating, Bowl OD, Bowl OD First Stage, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils), Bowl OD Addl
Stage(s), Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils), Column ID, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8
mils), Column OD, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils), Head ID, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy
(8 mils), Head OD, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils)
$ -
0 0 Motor
US, VHS 75.00 Hp 1770 RPM H075S2A1GD-WVNU-000A0B000, Steady Bushing: No,
Motor Coupling: NRR
$ -
0 0 Order Processing Lead Time
3 - 4 weeks
$ -
0 0 Production Lead Time
10 - 12 weeks + Transit
$ -
License No. 1033562: Class A General Engineering & C-57 Drilling Contractor C-10 Electrical Contractor & C-55 Water Treatment & C-16 Fire Protection & C61/D21 Pumps and Machines Wednesday, September 13, 2023
1480 Main Street
St. Helena, CA
City of St. Helena
New Complete Pumps complete with discharge heads, WITH NEW MOTORS 410 Crystal Springs
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 281 of 282 ends

0 0 6000GPM @ 38TDH 1200RPM $ -
1 Each VIT - Short Set Line shaft Turbine Pumps
Wet pit/Open Sump Line shaft Turbine: Open Line shaft, VIT-FFTM 16RGHC, 1 Stage
$ 62,798.75
0 0 Bowl Assembly
16RGHC, 1 Stage(s), Manufacturer's Standard
$ -
0 0 Column Assembly
12" x 1.1875" Threaded W/L Column
$ -
0 0 Head Assembly
12" x 16.50" FF W/L Head, 150 # Flange
$ -
0 0 Coating
Coating, Bowl OD, Bowl OD First Stage, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils), Column ID,
Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils), Column OD, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils), Head
ID, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils), Head OD, Tnemec 141, Liquid Epoxy (8 mils)
$ -
0 0 Motor
US, VHS 125.00 Hp 1770 RPM H125S2A1GD-WVRU-000A0C000, Steady Bushing: Yes,
Motor Coupling: NRR
$ -
0 0 Order Processing Lead Time
3 - 4 weeks
$ -
0 0 Production Lead Time
10 - 12 weeks + Transit
$ -
0 0 0 $ -
Total for materials $ 172,247.25
Sales Tax $ 13,349.16
Freight $ -

LABOR DESCRIPTION
0 $ -
No Labor for this quote. Parts only $ -
TOTAL $ 185,596.41
Sincerely,
Ron Foster
Field and Operations Manager
Agenda Item #12.4.

Page 282 of 282 ends

St. Helena City CouncilSeptember 26, 2023

St. Helena City Council
September 26, 2023