Agenda — Stanton City Council, November 22, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

The health and well-being of our residents is the top priority for the City of Stanton, and you are urged to take all appropriate health safety precautions given the health risks associated with COVID-19. The City Council meeting will be held in person in the City Council Chambers located at 7800 Katella Avenue, California 90680.

ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY DO SO AS FOLLOWS:
• Attend in person and complete and submit a request to speak card to the Clerk. • E-Mail your comments to [email protected] with the subject line “PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #” (insert the item number relevant to your comment). Comments received no later than 4:30 p.m. before the scheduled meeting will be compiled, provided to the City Council, and made available to the public before the start of the meeting. Staff will not read e-mailed comments at the meeting. However, the official record will include all e-mailed comments received until the close of the meeting.

Should you have any questions related to participation in the City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 890-4245.

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF STANTON AND TO THE CITY CLERK / SECRETARY:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting (Closed Session) of the City Council / Successor Agency / Housing Authority for the City of Stanton is hereby called by the Mayor / Chairman, to be held on November 22, 2022, commencing at 5:30 p.m. at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680.

The Agenda for the Special Meeting (Closed Session) is attached to this Notice andCall.

Dated: November 17, 2022
s/ Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk / Secretary
SAFETY ALERT – NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19

IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, IF YOU NEED SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT (714) 890-4245. NOTIFICATION BY 48 HOURS PRIOR

TO THE MEETING WILL ENABLE THE CITY TO MAKE REASONABLE ARRANGEMENTS TO ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO THIS MEETING.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 1 of 13 ends

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/STANTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

SPECIAL AND JOINT REGULAR MEETING
STANTON CITY HALL, 7800 KATELLA AVENUE, STANTON, CA 90680 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2022
SPECIAL CLOSED SESSION - 5:30 P.M.

JOINT REGULAR SESSION - 6:30 P.M.

SAFETY ALERT – NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19
In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 890-4245.

Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY DO SO AS FOLLOWS:
• Attend in person and complete and submit a request to speak card to the City Clerk. • E-Mail your comments to [email protected] with the subject line “PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #” (insert the item number relevant to your comment). Comments received no later than 4:30 p.m. before the scheduled meeting will be compiled, provided to the City Council, and made available to the public before the start of the meeting. Staff will not read e-mailed comments at the meeting. However, the official record will include all e-mailed comments received until the close of the meeting.

Should you have any questions related to participation in the City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 890-4245.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 2 of 13 ends

The City Council agenda and supporting documentation is made available for public review and inspection during normal business hours in the Office of the City Clerk, 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton California 90680 immediately following distribution of the agenda packet to a majority of the City Council. Packet delivery typically takes place on Thursday afternoons prior to the regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday. The agenda packet is also available for review and inspection on the city’s website at www.StantonCA.gov.

1. CLOSED SESSION(5:30 PM)

2. ROLL CALL Council / Agency / Authority Member Taylor Council / Agency / Authority Member Van
Council / Agency / Authority Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem / Vice Chairman Ramirez
Mayor / Chairman Shawver

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Closed Session may convene to consider matters of purchase / sale of real property (G.C. §54956.8), pending litigation (G.C. §54956.9(a)), potential litigation (G.C. §54956.9(b)) or personnel items (G.C. §54957.6). Records not available for public inspection.

4. CLOSED SESSION
4A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Number of Potential Cases: 2
4B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8)
Property: 8830 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-01)
8840 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-02)
8850 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-03)
8860 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-04)
8870 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-05)
8880 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-06)
8890 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-07)
8900 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-08)
8910 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-09)
8920 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-10)
8930 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-11)
8940 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-12)
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 3 of 13 ends

8950 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-13)
8960 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-14)
8970 Tina Way, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-15)
8841 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-29)
8851 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-28)
8861 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-27)
8870 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-05)
8871 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-26)
8880 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-06)
8881 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-25)
8890 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-07)
8891 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-24)
8900 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-08)
8901 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-23)
8910 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-09)
8911 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-22)
8920 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-10)
8921 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-21)
8930 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-11)
8931 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-20)
8940 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-12)
8941 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-19)
8950 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-13)
8951 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-18)
8960 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-14)
8961 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-17)
8970 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-482-15)
8971 Pacific Avenue, Anaheim, CA (APN 126-481-16)
Negotiating Parties: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager, City of Stanton Hannah Shin-Heydorn, Executive Director, Housing Authority Hannah Shin-Heydorn, Executive Director, Successor Agency David M. Cook and Chaicran Daphnie, Owner
Jennie Trust, Owner
Nga Summer Thien Trang (Trang Trust), Owner
Ngoc Trieu and Andy Pham, Owner
Sky Nguyen / Nguyen Sky SN Living Trust, Owner
Steven W. Reiss Trust (Steven W. Reiss), Owner
Tammy T. Doan and H. Le Harvey, Owner
Trachy Family Trust (Phillip R. Trachy), Owner
Under Negotiation: Instruction to negotiator will concern price and terms of payment.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 4 of 13 ends

5. CALL TO ORDER STANTON CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY JOINT REGULAR MEETING (6:30 PM)

6. ROLL CALL Council / Agency / Authority Member Taylor Council / Agency / Authority Member Van
Council / Agency / Authority Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem / Vice Chairman Ramirez
Mayor / Chairman Shawver

7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

8. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS None.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the Consent Calendar may be acted on simultaneously, unless a Council/Board Member requests separate discussion and/or action.

CONSENT CALENDAR
9A. MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON THE

PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER READING WAIVED
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council/Agency Board/Authority Board waive reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.
9B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
City Council approve demand warrants dated October 21, 2022 – November 3, 2022, in the amount of $2,178,671.76.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 5 of 13 ends

9C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority approve Minutes of Joint Regular Meeting – November 8, 2022.
9D. SEPTEMBER 2022 INVESTMENT REPORT
The Investment Report as of September 30, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council finds that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of September 2022. 9E. SEPTEMBER 2022 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY) The Investment Report as of September 30, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Successor Agency find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of September 2022.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 6 of 13 ends

9F. SEPTEMBER 2022 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; AND STATUS OF

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended September 30, 2022, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section

2.20.080 (D) and is being provided to City Council. This report includes information for both the City’s General Fund and the Housing Authority Fund. In addition, staff has provided a status of the City’s Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) as of September 30, 2022.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund’s September 2022 Revenue and Expenditure Report and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended September 30, 2022.
9G. RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974 Pursuant to the Political Reform Act (“Act”), the City Council directed staff to: (1) conduct a review of the City’s Conflict of Interest Code (“Code”) to determine if a change in the Code was necessary; (2) file a biennial notice regarding the results of the review no later than the required deadline; (3) revise the Code if necessary based upon such review; and (4) submit the amended Code to the City Council for adoption and approval, in accordance with Section 87303 of the Act.

During the review process, staff found that amendments to the City’s Conflict of Interest Code are necessary. A redline version of the proposed amended Code is attached.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-44, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON

APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF

INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF
1974”.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 7 of 13 ends

9H. AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES WITH KTGY FOR

THE PREPARATION OF THE TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN
Due to staffing changes among the consultant team, additional time is requested to complete the Town Center Specific Plan and associated studies. The original term of the contract ended June 30, 2022. Staff requests the Council authorize an extension to June 30, 2023.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Approve the Amendment to the Agreement for Consulting Services with KTGY to extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2023; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment between the City of Stanton and KTGY.
9I. AWARD OF CONTRACT TO DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS, LLC TO

PROVIDE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF-EVALUATION AND

TRANSITION PLAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS (TASK CODE 2022-839)
City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide professional ADA self-evaluation and transition plan development services. Disability Access Consultants, LLC is the best qualified firm to provide the professional services and staff is recommending award of contract to that firm. In addition, staff is requesting City Council approval for an appropriation of $20,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211) to increase the budget for the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan project from $90,000 to $110,000.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare this action to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, since the action herein does not constitute a “project” as defined by Section 15378 of the CEQA guidelines; and

2. Award a contract to Disability Access Consultants, LLC to provide professional ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan development services for a maximum contract amount of $99,730; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and Disability Access Consultants, LLC in a contract to provide the services; and Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 8 of 13 ends

4. Authorize the City Manager to approve a contingency in the amount of $10,000 to Disability Access Consultants, LLC; and

5. Appropriate $20,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211) to increase the ADA SelfEvaluation and Transition Plan Development project’s budget to $110,000. 9J. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR SPLASH PAD MAINTENANCE As the current contract is set to expire on November 30, 2022, City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide professional splash pad maintenance services at Stanton Central Park and Harry M. Dotson Park. California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters is qualified to provide the professional services and staff is recommending award of contract to that firm.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Award a contract to California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters to provide professional splash pad maintenance and repair services for a maximum contract amount of $14,940 annually, excluding CPI adjustments as provided for in the Professional Services Agreement; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters in a contract to provide the services; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to approve a contingency in the amount of $5,000 to California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters. 9K. AWARD OF CONTRACT TO BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP TO PROVIDE

A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide a professional Pavement Management Plan. Bucknam Infrastructure Group is the best qualified firm to provide the professional services and staff is recommending award of contract to the firm. In addition, staff is requesting City Council approval for an appropriation of $26,196.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Page 9 of 13 ends

2. Award a contract to Bucknam Infrastructure Group to provide a professional Pavement Management Plan for a maximum contract amount of $23,796; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and Bucknam Infrastructure Group in a contract to provide the services; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to approve a contingency in the amount of $2,400 to Bucknam Infrastructure Group; and

5. Appropriate $26,196 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211).
9L. RENEWAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR VIRTUAL PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361
Consideration of the circumstances of the state of emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic to determine whether remote teleconference meetings of the City Council, Committees, and Commissions can continue to be held under the provisions of AB 361.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency; and

3. Find that state or local officials have continued to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and

4. Direct staff, no later than 30 days after the City Council approves the recommended action, to report back on the state-proclaimed state of emergency so that City Council may reconsider the circumstances of the emergency, and, if appropriate, make findings to continue to hold virtual meetings of City legislative bodies pursuant to AB 361.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 10 of 13 ends

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
10A. URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 20.400.330 OF THE STANTON

MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND DETERMINING THE ORDINANCE TO BE

EXEMPT FROM CEQA
In September 2022, the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law, a new bill (“SB 897”) that further amends Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22—the state statutes regulating accessory dwelling units (“ADUs”) and junior accessory dwelling units (“JADUs”), respectively. SB 897 goes into effect on January 1, 2023. If the City’s ADU ordinance does not comply with state law, then its entire ADU ordinance becomes null and void as a matter of law. The attached urgency ordinance updates the City’s ADU ordinance to comply with SB 897.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council conduct a public hearing; and

2. Waive further reading and find that Urgency Ordinance No. 1123 is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety for the reasons stated therein, entitled:
“AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 20.400.330 OF

THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS TO

ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH STATE REGULATIONS AND FINDING
THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA”; and

3. Find that Urgency Ordinance No. 1123 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; and

4. Adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 1123 to take immediate effect.

11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 11 of 13 ends

12. NEW BUSINESS
12A. PUBLIC CABLE TELEVISION AUTHORITY LEASE
The Public Cable Television Authority (PCTA) is a joint powers agency representing the Cities of Stanton, Fountain Valley, and Westminster. The City of Fountain Valley has provided the PCTA with notice to terminate the existing lease agreement at City facilities. At the direction of the PCTA Board of Directors, PCTA staff was directed to identify potential office space within member cities or in the commercial market. The Council will consider authorizing the Mayor to enter into a lease agreement for a oneyear term with the PCTA, effective January 1, 2023.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a lease agreement for a one-year term with the PCTA, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
12B. AMENDMENTS TO STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 5.77 – COMMERCIAL

CANNABIS BUSINESSES
The Council will consider an amended and restated version of Chapter 5.77 of Title 5 of the Stanton Municipal Code related to commercial cannabis businesses. The proposed amendments clarify portions of the chapter as well as provide more recent best practices in processing, permitting, and regulating such businesses.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council consider and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1124, titled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON AMENDING AND RESTATING CHAPTER 5.77 (COMMERCIAL
CANNABIS BUSINESSES) OF TITLE 5 (BUSINESS LICENSES AND

REGULATIONS) OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE AND

DETERMINING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15060(C)(2), 15061(B)(3) AND 15378(b)(5)”; and

2. Set Ordinance No. 1124 for second reading at the regular City Council meeting of December 13, 2022.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 12 of 13 ends

13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC
At this time members of the public may address the City Council/Successor Agency/Stanton Housing Authority regarding any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council/Successor Agency/Stanton Housing Authority, provided that NO action may be taken on non-agenda items.
• Members of the public wishing to address the Council/Agency/Authority during Oral Communications-Public or on a particular item are requested to fill out a REQUEST TO SPEAK form and submit it to the City Clerk. Request to speak forms must be turned in prior to Oral Communications-Public.
• When the Mayor/Chairman calls you to the microphone, please state your Name, slowly and clearly, for the record. A speaker’s comments shall be limited to a three (3) minute aggregate time period on Oral Communications and Agenda Items.

Speakers are then to return to their seats and no further comments will be permitted. • Remarks from those seated or standing in the back of chambers will not be permitted. All those wishing to speak including Council/Agency/Authority and Staff need to be recognized by the Mayor/Chairman before speaking.

14. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None.

15. MAYOR/CHAIRMAN COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED BUSINESS 15A. COMMITTEE REPORTS/ COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY ANNOUNCEMENTS At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may report on items not specifically described on the agenda which are of interest to the community provided no discussion or action may be taken except to provide staff direction to report back or to place the item on a future agenda.
15B. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE MEETING At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may place an item on a future agenda. 15C. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE STUDY

SESSION
At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may place an item on a future study session agenda.

Currently Scheduled: None.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk November 22, 2022

Page 13 of 13 ends

16. ITEMS FROM CITY ATTORNEY/AGENCY COUNSEL/AUTHORITY COUNSEL

17. ITEMS FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
17A. PURCHASING POLICY AND PROCEDURES
The City’s Purchasing Policy and Procedures (Policy) were last updated in 2018.

Pursuant to the Stanton Municipal Code, the Policy establishes guidelines surrounding the purchase and procurement of supplies, services, and equipment on behalf of the City. The City Council will consider updates to the Policy.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Provide direction to staff on desired updates to the Policy. 17A. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT
At this time the Orange County Sheriff’s Department will provide the City Council with an update on their current operations.

18. ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted at the Post Office, Stanton Community Services Center and City Hall, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 17th day of November, 2022. s/ Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk/Secretary
October 21, 2022 - November 3, 2022
Electronic Transaction Nos. $ 260,416.43
Check Nos. 1,918,255.33
TOTAL $ 2,178,671.76
Demands listed on the attached
registers are accurate and funds
are available for payment thereof.
**-Check no. 135783 was not issued. It was damaged during the check printing process.

CITY OF STANTON

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE REGISTER
2185-2211
conform to the City of Stanton Annual
Budget as approved by the City Council.
135783-135827**
Demands listed on the attached registers
City Manager Finance Director
/s/ Hannah Shin-Heydorn /s/ Michelle Bannigan
Item: 9B
Click here to return to the agenda.

ATTACHMENT A
1 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
2 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
3 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
4 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
5 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
6 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
7 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
8 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
9 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
10 of 10
DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – November 8, 2022 - Page 1 of 6

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY

OF THE CITY OF STANTON
JOINT REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 8, 2022

1. CLOSED SESSION None.

2. CALL TO ORDER STANTON CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY /

HOUSING AUTHORITY JOINT REGULAR MEETING
The City Council / Successor Agency / Housing Authority meeting was called to order at 6:33 p.m. by Council Member Warren.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Mr. Jerry Ristrom.

4. ROLL CALL

Present: Council/Agency/Authority Member Taylor, Council/Agency/Authority Member Van, and Council/Agency/Authority Member Warren.

Absent: Mayor/Chairman Shawver.

Excused: Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Ramirez.

5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS None.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Taylor requested to pull item 6E from the consent calendar for separate discussion.

Motion/Second: Van/Taylor
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council/Agency/Authority Member Taylor AYE Council/Agency/Authority Member Van AYE
Council/Agency/Authority Member Warren AYE
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Ramirez ABSENT
Mayor/Chairman Shawver ABSENT
Motion unanimously carried:

Item: 9C
Click here to return to the agenda.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – November 8, 2022 - Page 2 of 6

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

CONSENT CALENDAR
6A. MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON

THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER

READING WAIVED
The City Council/Agency Board/Authority Board waived reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.
6B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
The City Council approved demand warrants dated October 7, 2022 – October 20, 2022, in the amount of $1,725,769.48.
6C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority approved Minutes of Joint Regular Meeting – October 25, 2022.
6D. CITY SPONSORSHIP REQUEST – YOUTH ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, SANTA’S SIREN EVENT
Per the City Sponsorship Program, the Youth Assistance Foundation is requesting co-sponsorship of the Santa’s Siren event held throughout the City. The sponsorship request is for in-kind consideration valued at $499. At its meeting on August 23, 2022, the City Council directed staff to bring all sponsorship requests to the Council for consideration until further notice.

1. The City Council declared this project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, Section 15301c; and

2. Approved the Youth Assistance Foundation’s sponsorship request for a total inkind value of $499.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – November 8, 2022 - Page 3 of 6

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
6E. CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES –

COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
City Council will consider authorizing the City Manager to execute two on-call Contract Agreements with qualified firms on behalf of the Community and Economic Development Department for building services. The Community and Economic Development Department utilizes these services to accomplish its annual goals as defined by the City Council in the approved annual Operating Budget.

Staff report by Ms. Jennifer A. Lilley, Community and Economic Development Director.

Motion/Second: Taylor/Van
Motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 3 (Taylor, Van, and Warren)
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: 2 (Ramirez and Shawver)
Motion unanimously carried:

1. The City Council declared the action as not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and will have no result direct or indirect to physical changes in the environment; and

2. Authorized the City Manager to enter into a three-year Contract Services Agreement, with two additional one-year extensions, with CSG Consultants to provide Building and Safety Services including on-call, as needed plan check, inspection and Building Official Services; and

3. Authorized the City Manager to enter into a three-year Contract Services Agreement, with two additional one-year extensions, with Bureau Veritas to provide Building and Safety Services including on-call, as needed plan check, inspection and Building Official Services.

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS None.

8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – November 8, 2022 - Page 4 of 6

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

9. NEW BUSINESS
9A. HOMELESSNESS AND PUBLIC SAFETY PILOT PROGRAM
At its meeting of October 25, 2022, Council consensus was received for City Council Initiated Item – Discussion Regarding Obtaining Services/Assistance for the City’s Public Safety Services Department and Public Works Division, and the City Council directed the City Manager to work with the Chief of Police and Public Safety Director to produce a staff report for implementation of the Homelessness and Public Safety Pilot Program (Pilot Program). The Pilot Program brings together, for the first time, a fully staffed, dedicated team of homeless outreach coordination, code enforcement, and law enforcement to focus on homeless support services, public safety, and quality of life issues.

Staff report by Ms. Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager.

Motion/Second: Van/Taylor
Motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 3 (Taylor, Van, and Warren)
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: 2 (Ramirez and Shawver)
Motion unanimously carried:

1. The City Council finds that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Directed staff to proceed with a six-month Pilot Program beginning November 14, 2022 through May 13, 2022; and

3. Authorized the reallocation of $100,850 from the City’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Allocation (ARPA Fund # 257) that is currently allocated for the “Purchase of Property/Housing Opportunities” project to fund the Homelessness and Public Safety Pilot Program instead.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – November 8, 2022 - Page 5 of 6

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

10. ORAL COMMUNICATION None.

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None.

12. MAYOR/CHAIRMAN/COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED BUSINESS 12A. COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY ANNOUNCEMENTS None.
12B. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE COUNCIL

MEETING
None.
12C. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE STUDY

SESSION
None.

13. ITEMS FROM CITY ATTORNEY/AGENCY COUNSEL/AUTHORITY COUNSEL None.

14. ITEMS FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
None.
14A. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY
At this time the Orange County Fire Authority will provide the City Council with an update on their current operations.

Chief Steve Dohman provided the City Council with an update on their current operations.

Council Member Warren reported on the City’s upcoming Veterans Day Ceremony, which is scheduled to be held on Friday, November 11, 2022 at Veterans Memorial Park.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – November 8, 2022 - Page 6 of 6

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

15. ADJOURNMENT Motion/Second: Shawver/
Motion carried at 6:44 p.m.
_______________________________________

MAYOR/CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
_______________________________________

CITY CLERK/SECRETARY
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 2022 INVESTMENT REPORT
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Investment Report as of September 30, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of September 2022.

BACKGROUND:

Changes in the City’s cash and investment balances during the month of September are summarized below:

Between August 31, 2022, and September 30, 2022, the City’s total cash and investments decreased by approximately $2.7 million. In addition, $25 million was transferred to Chandler Asset Management, Inc. (“Chandler”).

The City’s cash and investment balances by fund type are presented in Attachment A. A summary of the City’s investment portfolio is included as Attachment B. The detail of the City’s investments by type that are managed by City staff are shown in Attachment C.

The detail of investments by type that are managed by Chandler are shown in Attachment D.

Beginning Balance Net Change Ending Balance
Cash and Investment Accounts (Pooled-All Funds) $ 64,685,922.06 $ (2,357,248.32) $ 62,328,673.74 Cash (Non-Pooled) 4,176,706.62 (321,396.97) 3,855,309.65 Total Cash and Investments $ 68,862,628.68 $ (2,678,645.29) $ 66,183,983.39 Item: 9D
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 ANALYSIS:

The monthly cash and investment report provides a summary of the cash and investment accounts held by the City as of the end of that month. In order to manage its cash and investments, the City combines cash resources from all funds into a single pool consisting of a variety of accounts and securities. The balance in the pooled cash account includes cash and certain liquid investments that are available to meet the City’s current cash needs. Cash in excess of the City’s current cash needs is invested in interest-bearing investments with various maturities.

As of September 30, 2022, the market value of the City’s total investment portfolio was $57.0 million, of which $32.3M (57%) is managed by City staff and $24.7M (43%) is managed by Chandler (Attachment B). Detailed information regarding the securities contained in the City’s investment portfolio is provided in Attachments C and D. As of September 30, 2022, City investments consisted of the following:

The City’s investment portfolio is well-diversified with investments spread across nine different security types. Likewise, the average maturity of the City’s portfolio (except for LAIF) is approximately 2 years, which is within the 3.5 years target in the City’s investment policy.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All deposits and investments have been made in accordance with the City's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Investment Policy. The portfolio will allow the City to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. Staff remains confident that the investment portfolio is currently positioned to remain secure and sufficiently liquid.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

Market Value as of
September 30, 2022
Percentage of
Portfolio
Invested by Type
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Permitted by
Investment Policy In Compliance?
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) $ 26,518,858.69 46.55% 100.00% Yes U.S. Treasury Notes 8,707,995.40 15.28% 100.00% Yes
Corporate Notes 5,763,813.21 10.12% 30.00% Yes
Federal Agency Securities 5,094,140.35 8.94% 100.00% Yes Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 4,859,852.80 8.53% 30.00% Yes Asset Backed Securities 2,431,170.05 4.27% 20.00% Yes
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations 2,307,697.63 4.05% 20.00% Yes Municipal Bonds 955,537.70 1.68% 100.00% Yes
Money Market Funds 332,889.43 0.58% 20.00% Yes
Total Investments $ 56,971,955.26 100.00%
3 LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

4. Ensure Fiscal Stability and Efficiency in Governance Prepared by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
B. Investments Portfolio Summary
C. Investment Portfolio Detail (Managed by City Staff)
D. Investment Portfolio Detail (Managed by Chandler)
Fund/ Account
No. Fund/Account Name Beginning Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance 101-various General Fund $ 24,381,302.73 $ 26,593,664.85 $ (28,349,472.62) $ 22,625,494.96 102-111101 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) (251,850.82) 543,720.78 (774,243.25) (482,373.29) 210-111101 Certified Access Specialists (CASP) Program 53,197.27 22.68 - 53,219.95 211-111101 Gas Tax Fund 1,421,440.50 102,383.65 (46,065.38) 1,477,758.77 215-111101 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation act (RMRA) Fund 77,869.76 1,205,863.23 (7,418.75) 1,276,314.24 220-111101 Measure M Fund 1,009,427.55 135,174.36 (27,081.19) 1,117,520.72 221-111101 Community Development Block Grant-COVID-19 (CDBG- 1,050.36 211,257.71 (1,296.89) 211,011.18 223-111101 Protective Services Fund (1,080.00) - (540.00) (1,620.00) 224-111101 Lighting Maintenance 1919 Act Fund 634,224.96 6,609.25 (20,897.57) 619,936.64225-111101 Lighting/Median Maintenance 1972 Act Fund 1,041,137.58 6,661.50 (34,032.88) 1,013,766.20 226-111101 Air Quality Improvement Fund 177,982.39 13,921.94 (1,119.25) 190,785.08 227-111101 Other Grants Fund (61,749.11) - (753.96) (62,503.07) 242-111101 Supplemental Law Enforcement Grant Fund 343,357.63 79,210.05 (14,898.48) 407,669.20 245-111101 Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Grant Fund - - (8,937.13) (8,937.13)250-111101 Families and Communities Together (FaCT) Grant Fund (23,653.19) 29,965.65 (36,730.89) (30,418.43) 251-111101 Senior Transportation Fund 56,429.49 9,916.93 (5,829.13) 60,517.29 257-111101 America Rescue Act Plan (ARPA) Fund 7,536,822.64 37,210.38 (184,366.82) 7,389,666.20 261-111101 Street Impact Fees Fund 101,834.11 506.31 (625.15) 101,715.27263-111101 Community Center Impact Fees Fund 169,322.44 841.86 1,039.45 169,124.85264-111101 Police Services Impact Fees Fund 152,986.94 760.64 939.17 152,808.41 271-111101 Public Safety Task Force Fund (City Funds) 110,658.00 - - 110,658.00 280-111101 Stanton Central Park Maintenance Fund 5,136.06 4,933.33 10,115.32 (45.93) 285-various Stanton Housing Authority Fund 12,432,101.24 83,953.27 (134,461.02) 12,381,593.49 305-111101 Capital Projects Fund 260,114.15 51,449.40 (54,300.14) 257,263.41 310-111101 Park and Recreation Facilities Fund 3,905,775.03 19,356.10 (43,060.55) 3,882,070.58501-111101 Sewer Maintenance Fund 6,030,524.24 41,879.59 (176,246.90) 5,896,156.93 502-111101 Sewer Capital Improvement Fund 2,947.99 14.48 (17.88) 2,944.59 602-111101 Workers' Compensation Fund 525,156.38 20,779.03 (3,306.82) 542,628.59603-111101 Liability Risk Management Fund 132,954.09 664.55 (820.53) 132,798.11 604-111101 Employee Benefits Fund (270,131.06) 185,295.22 (131,535.14) (216,370.98) 605-111101 Fleet Maintenance Fund 423,858.53 16,131.30 (10,420.00) 429,569.83 801-111101 Expendable Deposits Fund (23,202.82) 1,000.00 - (22,202.82) 901-111101 North Orange County Collaborative (NOC) Trust Fund 2,991,776.18 10,719.82 (352,343.10) 2,650,152.90 Total Pooled Cash and Investments(1) $ 28,075,667.04 64,685,922.06 $ $ (30,408,727.48) $ 62,328,673.74 Less: Investments(1) $ (32,550,769.63) $ (25,026,561.400) $ 605,375.76 $ (56,971,955.27) Cash - Bank of the West General Checking Account $ 32,135,152.43 $ 3,049,105.64 $ (29,803,351.72) $ 5,356,718.47

CITY OF STANTON

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 2 ends

Fund/ Account
No. Fund/Account Name Beginning Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance

CITY OF STANTON

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

CASH-NON-POOLED
xxx-111103 Payroll Account $ - $ 417,875.29 $ (417,875.29) $ - 101-111109 Flexible Spending/AFLAC 12,062.45 - (423.20) 11,639.25 101-111505 Petty Cash 600.00 - - 600.00
285-111403 Cash with Property Management Company (QMG) 111,309.99 107,189.41 (171,448.74) 47,050.66 604-111404 Cash with Fiscal Agent (PARS) (2) - 4,052,734.18 (256,714.44) 3,796,019.74 Total Cash-Non-Pooled $ 4,176,706.62 $ 525,064.70 $ (846,461.67) $ 3,855,309.65

INVESTMENTS
POOLED ALL FUNDS $ 32,550,769.63 $ 25,026,561.40 $ (605,375.76) $ 56,971,955.27 Total Investments (3) $ 25,026,561.40 32,550,769.63 $ $ (605,375.76) $ 56,971,955.27 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 68,862,628.68 $ 28,600,731.74 $ (31,255,189.15) $ 66,183,983.39 Notes:
(3) - The Portfolio Summary Report and Holdings by Security Type are included in Attachments B and C, respectively.(1) - Pooled cash includes: City's Bank of the West general checking, investment sweep, and safekeeping accounts, the City's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) account, the Housing Authority's LAIF account, and the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) account. (2) - The Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) account is an irrevocable trust that can be used for pension and other post employment benefits only.

This fund is excluded from the compliance requirements set forth in the City's investment policy.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 ends

2 Invested by City
Staff
$32.3M
57%
Invested by
Chandler
$24.7M
43%
Portfolio Summary
as of September 30, 2022
TOTAL = $57.0M

ATTACHMENT C ATTACHMENT D
ATTACHMENT B Click here to return to the agenda.

City of Stanton
Portfolio Holdings
Investment Portfolio | by Security Sector
Report Format: By Transaction
Group By: Security Sector
Average By: Face Amount / Shares
Portfolio / Report Group: All Portfolios
As of 9/30/2022
Description CUSIP/Ticker
Settlement
Date
YTM @
Cost
Face
Amount/Shares Cost Value Book Value Market Value
Maturity
Date
Days To
Maturity
Accrued
Interest
% of
Portfolio
Certificate Of Deposit
Allegiance Bank TX 2.65
2/14/2023 01748DBB1 4/11/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 248,113.56 2/14/2023 137 289.25 0.76 Bank Hapoalim NY 2.9 3/25/2024 06251AW48 4/24/2019 2.900 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 245,275.00 3/25/2024 542 99.32 0.76 Bank of New England NH 2.65
5/23/2024 06426KBE7 5/23/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 242,685.36 5/23/2024 601 126.55 0.76 Cornerstone Community Bank CA

2.6 5/17/2024 219240BY3 5/17/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 242,560.86 5/17/2024 595 230.58 0.76 EagleBank MD 2.65 4/28/2023 27002YEL6 4/30/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,202.22 4/28/2023 210 0.00 0.76 Evansville Teachers FCU IN 2.25
7/22/2024 299547AV1 7/22/2019 2.250 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 240,242.67 7/22/2024 661 122.79 0.76 First Technology FCU CA 3.35
9/27/2023 33715LCJ7 9/27/2018 3.350 240,000.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 238,154.40 9/27/2023 362 66.08 0.73 First Tier Bank NE 1.95 8/23/2024 33766LAJ7 8/23/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 238,427.46 8/23/2024 693 93.12 0.76 Greenstate FCU IA 1.95
2/28/2023 39573LAF5 8/28/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,217.16 2/28/2023 151 26.61 0.76 Healthcare Systems FCU VA 2.65
4/25/2024 42228LAD3 4/25/2019 2.650 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 240,135.36 4/25/2024 573 2,821.92 0.75 Horizon Bank NE 1.7 8/29/2023 44042TBQ6 7/29/2019 2.101 249,000.00 245,090.70 248,127.48 244,762.02 8/29/2023 333 11.60 0.76 Main Street Bank VA 2.6
4/26/2024 56065GAG3 4/26/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 242,814.84 4/26/2024 574 70.95 0.76 McGregor TX 2.3 6/28/2024 32112UDA6 7/12/2019 2.200 249,000.00 250,170.30 249,411.19 241,873.62 6/28/2024 637 31.38 0.76 Merrick Bank UT 2.6 8/23/2023 59013J7P8 4/23/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 245,797.86 8/23/2023 327 124.16 0.76 Morgan Stanley NY 3.1 2/7/2024 61760AVJ5 2/7/2019 3.100 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 242,435.46 2/7/2024 495 1,128.23 0.75 Morgan Stanley UT 3.1 2/7/2024 61690UDW7 2/7/2019 3.100 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 242,435.46 2/7/2024 495 1,128.23 0.75 Mountain America CU UT 3
3/27/2023 62384RAF3 4/9/2019 2.840 249,000.00 250,494.00 249,183.65 247,926.81 3/27/2023 178 61.40 0.76 Raymond James Bank FL 2
8/23/2024 75472RAE1 8/23/2019 2.000 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 236,774.20 8/23/2024 693 514.30 0.75 University of Iowa CU IA 3.05
5/15/2023 91435LAG2 4/25/2019 2.919 248,000.00 249,240.00 248,190.06 246,675.68 5/15/2023 227 600.98 0.75 Washington Federal Bank WA

1.95 8/28/2024 938828BN9 8/28/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 238,342.80 8/28/2024 698 26.61 0.76 Sub Total / Average Certificate
Of Deposit 2.549 4,960,000.00 4,959,995.00 4,959,912.38 4,859,852.80 459 7,574.06 15.04

ATTACHMENT C

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda.

Description CUSIP/Ticker
Settlement
Date
YTM @
Cost
Face
Amount/Shares Cost Value Book Value Market Value
Maturity
Date
Days To
Maturity
Accrued
Interest
% of
Portfolio
Local Government Investment Pool
LAIF | City LGIP LAIFCITY0895 2/29/2020 1.513 17,809,749.20 17,809,749.20 17,809,749.20 17,467,106.75 N/A 1 54.00 LAIF | Housing Authority LGIP LAIFHA0004 2/29/2020 1.513 9,229,315.09 9,229,315.09 9,229,315.09 9,051,751.94 N/A 1 27.99 Sub Total / Average Local
Government Investment Pool 1.513 27,039,064.29 27,039,064.29 27,039,064.29 26,518,858.69 1 0.00 81.99 Municipal
Arvin Community CA 2.5
3/1/2023 043288AK5 8/8/2019 2.350 275,000.00 276,399.75 275,163.54 272,822.00 3/1/2023 152 553.82 0.83 Fort Bragg CA 1.871 8/1/2024 347028JZ6 9/18/2019 1.750 205,000.00 206,150.05 205,433.77 194,963.20 8/1/2024 671 628.60 0.62 Riverside Pension CA 2.75
6/1/2024 769036BD5 8/28/2019 2.030 250,000.00 258,120.00 252,848.30 242,517.50 6/1/2024 610 2,272.57 0.76 Stockton CA 2.5 9/1/2023 861403AU7 5/1/2019 2.600 250,000.00 248,975.00 249,782.58 245,235.00 9/1/2023 336 503.47 0.76 Sub Total / Average Municipal 2.207 980,000.00 989,644.80 983,228.19 955,537.70 424 3,958.46 2.97 Total / Average 1.689 32,979,064.29 32,988,704.09 32,982,204.86 32,334,249.19 82 11,532.52 100

ATTACHMENT C

Page 2 of 2 ends

ACCOUNT SUMMARY
Beg. Values
as of 8/31/22
End Values
as of 9/30/22
Market Value 24,637,706
Accrued Interest 0 113,123
Total Market Value 24,750,829
Income Earned 26,561
Cont/WD 0
Par 25,641,515
Book Value 24,913,438
Cost Value 24,913,438

TOP ISSUERS
Government of United States 35.3%
Federal Home Loan Bank 10.4%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 9.3%
Federal Farm Credit Bank 7.8%
Federal National Mortgage Assoc 2.4%
JP Morgan Chase & Co 1.7%
Bank of America Corp 1.7%
Morgan Stanley 1.7%
Total 70.3%

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
Average Modified Duration 2.61
Average Coupon 2.97%
Average Purchase YTM 4.09%
Average Market YTM 4.47%
Average S&P/Moody Rating AA/Aa1
Average Final Maturity 3.02 yrs
Average Life 2.79 yrs

SECTOR ALLOCATION MATURITY DISTRIBUTION CREDIT QUALITY (S&P) Portfolio Summary
As of September 30, 2022
City of Stanton
Account #10991

PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Annualized
TOTAL RATE OF RETURN 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS 1/1/1900 City of Stanton N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ICE BofA 1-5 Yr US Treasury & Agency Index -1.69% -2.28% -6.13% -6.78% -3.63% -0.97% 0.39% 0.62% N/A Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 Execution Time: 10/4/2022 1:20:46 PM ATTACHMENT D - Page 1 of 7
Click here to return to the agenda.

Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2022
City of Stanton
Account #10991
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
58769KAD6 Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2021-
B A3

0.4% Due 11/15/2024
365,000.00 Various

4.62%
352,692.58
352,692.58

96.54 4.75%
352,377.94

64.89 1.42%
(314.64)

NR / AAA
AAA

2.13 0.80
09690AAC7 BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2021-2 A3

0.33% Due 12/26/2024
350,000.00 09/14/2022

4.00%
339,814.45
339,814.45

97.15 4.51%
340,019.75

19.25 1.37%
205.30
Aaa / NR
AAA

2.24 0.68
43815PAC3 Honda Auto Receivables 2022-2 A3

3.73% Due 7/20/2026
350,000.00 09/21/2022

4.36%
345,625.00
345,625.00

98.30 4.57%
344,032.50
471.43

1.39%
(1,592.50)

NR / AAA
AAA

3.81 2.11
89238FAD5 Toyota Auto Receivables OT 2022-B A3

2.93% Due 9/15/2026
350,000.00 09/13/2022

4.13%
342,207.03
342,207.03

96.96 4.69%
339,374.70
455.78

1.37%
(2,832.33)
Aaa / AAA
NR

3.96 1.76
05522RDD7 Bank of America Credit Card Tr 2021-A1
A1

0.44% Due 9/15/2026
400,000.00 09/22/2022

4.45%
376,187.50
376,187.50

93.98 4.56%
375,902.80

78.22 1.52%
(284.70)

NR / AAA
AAA

3.96 1.49
92348KAL7 Verizon Master Trust 2022-1 A

1.04% Due 1/20/2027
350,000.00 09/14/2022

3.04%
340,607.42
340,607.42

97.36 3.18%
340,767.36
111.22

1.38%
159.94
Aaa / AAA
NR

4.31 1.24
02582JJT8 American Express Credit Trust 2022-2 A

3.39% Due 5/17/2027
350,000.00 09/13/2022

4.18%
343,382.81
343,382.81

96.77 4.75%
338,695.00
527.33

1.37%
(4,687.81)

NR / AAA
AAA

4.63 2.44
Total ABS 2,515,000.00 4.12%
2,440,516.79
2,440,516.79 4.43%
2,431,170.05
1,728.12

9.83%
(9,346.74)
Aaa / AAA
AAA

3.58 1.50
AGENCY
3130AT5B9 FHLB Note

3.375% Due 9/1/2023
650,000.00 09/15/2022

4.02%
646,087.00
646,087.00

99.17 4.30%
644,627.10
1,828.13

2.61%
(1,459.90)
Aaa / AA+
NR

0.92 0.89
3130A0F70 FHLB Note

3.375% Due 12/8/2023
650,000.00 09/13/2022

3.90%
645,931.00
645,931.00

98.80 4.42%
642,169.45
6,885.94

2.62%
(3,761.55)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

1.19 1.14
3130A0XE5 FHLB Note

3.25% Due 3/8/2024
650,000.00 09/13/2022

3.89%
644,066.70
644,066.70

98.48 4.35%
640,087.50
1,349.65

2.59%
(3,979.20)
Aaa / AA+
NR

1.44 1.38
3130ASHK8 FHLB Note

3.125% Due 6/14/2024
650,000.00 09/13/2022

3.85%
642,128.50
642,128.50

98.03 4.33%
637,181.35
5,642.36

2.60%
(4,947.15)
Aaa / AA+
NR

1.71 1.62
3133ENJ84 FFCB Note

3.375% Due 8/26/2024
650,000.00 09/13/2022

3.83%
644,540.00
644,540.00

98.26 4.33%
638,699.75
2,132.81

2.59%
(5,840.25)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

1.91 1.82
3133ENP79 FFCB Note

4.25% Due 9/26/2024
650,000.00 09/22/2022

4.25%
649,948.00
649,948.00

99.81 4.35%
648,796.20
383.68

2.62%
(1,151.80)
Aaa / AA+
NR

1.99 1.89
Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 2 Execution Time: 10/4/2022 1:20:46 PM ATTACHMENT D - Page 2 of 7
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2022
City of Stanton
Account #10991
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
AGENCY
3133ENP95 FFCB Note

4.25% Due 9/30/2025
650,000.00 09/23/2022

4.31%
648,875.50
648,875.50

99.74 4.34%
648,284.00

76.74 2.62%
(591.50)
Aaa / AA+
NR

3.00 2.79
3135G0Q22 FNMA Note

1.875% Due 9/24/2026
650,000.00 09/14/2022

3.73%
605,208.50
605,208.50

91.43 4.24%
594,295.00
236.98

2.40%
(10,913.50)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

3.99 3.77
Total Agency 5,200,000.00 3.97%
5,126,785.20
5,126,785.20 4.34%
5,094,140.35
18,536.29

20.66%
(32,644.85)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

2.00 1.89
CMO
3137BHXJ1 FHLMC K045 A2

3.023% Due 1/25/2025
458,626.05 09/16/2022

5.07%
446,837.92
446,837.92

96.53 4.62%
442,716.77
1,155.36

1.79%
(4,121.15)

NR / NR
AAA

2.32 2.10
3137BMTX4 FHLMC K052 A2

3.151% Due 11/25/2025
250,000.00 09/26/2022

4.89%
238,818.36
238,818.36

95.84 4.62%
239,595.25
656.46

0.97%
776.89

NR / NR
AAA

3.16 2.77
3137BN6G4 FHLMC KO53

2.995% Due 12/25/2025
350,000.00 09/16/2022

4.23%
338,064.45
338,064.45

95.30 4.62%
333,545.80
873.54

1.35%
(4,518.65)

NR / NR
AAA

3.24 2.86
3137BTUM1 FHLMC K061 A2

3.347% Due 11/25/2026
350,000.00 09/22/2022

4.37%
337,435.55
337,435.55

95.77 4.49%
335,184.50
976.21

1.36%
(2,251.05)

NR / NR
AAA

4.16 3.63
3137BVZ82 FHLMC K063

3.43% Due 1/25/2027
350,000.00 09/13/2022

3.97%
342,412.11
342,412.11

95.64 4.57%
334,736.50
1,000.42

1.36%
(7,675.61)

NR / NR
AAA

4.32 3.79
3137F2LJ3 FHLMC K066 A2

3.117% Due 6/25/2027
350,000.00 09/13/2022

3.97%
337,640.63
337,640.63

94.15 4.52%
329,532.70
909.13

1.34%
(8,107.93)

NR / NR
AAA

4.74 4.17
3137FAWS3 FHLMC K067 A2

3.194% Due 7/25/2027
310,000.00 09/22/2022

4.28%
295,856.25
295,856.25

94.32 4.52%
292,386.11
825.12

1.18%
(3,470.14)
Aaa / NR
NR

4.82 4.31
Total CMO 2,418,626.05 4.41%
2,337,065.27
2,337,065.27 4.57%
2,307,697.63
6,396.24

9.35%
(29,367.64)
Aaa / NR
AAA

3.76 3.33

CORPORATE
89115A2J0 Toronto-Dominion Bank Note

4.285% Due 9/13/2024
200,000.00 09/15/2022

4.57%
198,938.00
198,938.00

98.53 5.08%
197,060.40
380.89

0.80%
(1,877.60)
A1 / A
AA1.961.84
12572QAG0 CME Group Inc. Callable Note Cont
12/15/2024
3% Due 3/15/2025
250,000.00 09/16/2022

4.26%
242,670.00
242,670.00

95.83 4.82%
239,584.00
333.33

0.97%
(3,086.00)
Aa3 / AAAA2.46

2.33 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 3 Execution Time: 10/4/2022 1:20:46 PM ATTACHMENT D - Page 3 of 7
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2022
City of Stanton
Account #10991
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

CORPORATE
808513BB0 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note
Cont 2/24/2025

4.2% Due 3/24/2025
250,000.00 09/16/2022

4.36%
249,015.00
249,015.00

98.91 4.67%
247,264.75
204.17

1.00%
(1,750.25)
A2 / A
A

2.48 2.36
78016EZ59 Royal Bank of Canada Note

3.375% Due 4/14/2025
200,000.00 09/16/2022

4.49%
194,656.00
194,656.00

96.11 5.02%
192,223.20
3,131.25

0.79%
(2,432.80)
A1 / A
AA2.542.35
756109AV6 Realty Income Corp Callable Not Cont
2/15/2025

3.875% Due 4/15/2025
250,000.00 09/13/2022

4.47%
246,425.00
246,425.00

97.26 5.04%
243,155.00
4,467.01

1.00%
(3,270.00)
A3 / ANR2.54

2.34 14913R2V8 Caterpillar Financial Service Note

3.4% Due 5/13/2025
125,000.00 09/21/2022

4.39%
121,940.00
121,940.00

96.71 4.75%
120,893.38
1,629.17

0.50%
(1,046.62)
A2 / A
A

2.62 2.44
06368D3S1 Bank of Montreal Note

3.7% Due 6/7/2025
350,000.00 09/13/2022

4.50%
342,912.50
342,912.50

96.12 5.26%
336,428.05
4,100.83

1.38%
(6,484.45)
A2 / AAA2.69

2.48 63743HFE7 National Rural Utilities Note

3.45% Due 6/15/2025
250,000.00 09/19/2022

4.42%
243,805.00
243,805.00

96.49 4.85%
241,219.25
3,521.88

0.99%
(2,585.75)
A2 / AA2.71

2.51 91324PCP5 United Health Group Inc Note

3.75% Due 7/15/2025
125,000.00 09/21/2022

4.36%
122,981.25
122,981.25

97.31 4.79%
121,631.25
989.58

0.50%
(1,350.00)
A3 / A+
A

2.79 2.59
89236TKF1 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note

3.65% Due 8/18/2025
350,000.00 09/13/2022

4.23%
344,498.00
344,498.00

96.84 4.84%
338,944.20
1,525.90

1.38%
(5,553.80)
A1 / A+
A+

2.88 2.68
24422EWJ4 John Deere Capital Corp Note

4.05% Due 9/8/2025
125,000.00 09/21/2022

4.36%
123,933.75
123,933.75

98.33 4.66%
122,916.38
323.44

0.50%
(1,017.37)
A2 / A
A

2.94 2.73
46647PCZ7 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note
Cont 4/26/2025

4.08% Due 4/26/2026
200,000.00 09/13/2022

4.77%
195,980.00
195,980.00

96.29 5.31%
192,589.00
3,513.33

0.79%
(3,391.00)
A1 / AAA3.57

3.21 61747YET8 Morgan Stanley Callable Note Cont
7/17/2025

4.679% Due 7/17/2026
200,000.00 09/13/2022

4.79%
199,302.00
199,302.00

97.41 5.46%
194,828.40
1,845.61

0.79%
(4,473.60)
A1 / AA3.80

3.39 06051GLA5 Bank of America Corp Callable Note
Cont 7/22/2025

4.827% Due 7/22/2026
200,000.00 09/13/2022

4.92%
199,336.00
199,336.00

97.65 5.52%
195,300.40
1,850.35

0.80%
(4,035.60)
A2 / AAA3.81

3.39 06406RBJ5 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note
1X 7/24/2025

4.414% Due 7/24/2026
350,000.00 Various

4.53%
348,501.00
348,501.00

97.72 5.08%
342,008.80
2,789.40

1.39%
(6,492.20)
A1 / A
AA3.823.43
74340XBK6 Prologis LP Callable Note Cont 7/1/2026

3.25% Due 10/1/2026
250,000.00 09/14/2022

4.30%
240,397.50
240,397.50

93.22 5.15%
233,045.50
4,062.50

0.96%
(7,352.00)
A3 / A
NR

4.01 3.62
Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 4 Execution Time: 10/4/2022 1:20:46 PM ATTACHMENT D - Page 4 of 7
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2022
City of Stanton
Account #10991
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

CORPORATE
26442CAS3 Duke Energy Carolinas Callable Note
Cont 9/1/2026

2.95% Due 12/1/2026
250,000.00 09/16/2022

4.31%
237,035.00
237,035.00

92.76 4.89%
231,903.75
2,458.33

0.95%
(5,131.25)
Aa3 / A
NR

4.17 3.81
46647PCB0 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note
Cont 4/22/2026

1.578% Due 4/22/2027
250,000.00 09/15/2022

4.86%
221,377.50
221,377.50

86.40 5.46%
216,010.25
1,742.38

0.88%
(5,367.25)
A1 / AAA4.56

4.25 91324PEG3 United Health Group Inc Callable Note
Cont 4/15/2027

3.7% Due 5/15/2027
250,000.00 09/13/2022

4.21%
244,607.50
244,607.50

95.18 4.88%
237,945.75
3,365.97

0.97%
(6,661.75)
A3 / A+
A

4.62 4.12
89115A2C5 Toronto-Dominion Bank Note

4.108% Due 6/8/2027
200,000.00 09/13/2022

4.73%
194,794.00
194,794.00

94.33 5.49%
188,657.80
2,578.91

0.77%
(6,136.20)
A1 / A
NR

4.69 4.13
61747YEC5 Morgan Stanley Callable Note Cont
7/20/2026

1.512% Due 7/20/2027
250,000.00 09/15/2022

4.84%
219,305.00
219,305.00

85.20 5.51%
213,004.75
745.50

0.86%
(6,300.25)
A1 / AA4.81

4.49 06051GJS9 Bank of America Corp Callable Note
Cont 6/21/2027

1.734% Due 7/22/2027
250,000.00 09/15/2022

5.01%
219,722.50
219,722.50

85.75 5.58%
214,367.25
830.88

0.87%
(5,355.25)
A2 / AAA4.81

4.47 78016FZS6 Royal Bank of Canada Note

4.24% Due 8/3/2027
200,000.00 09/13/2022

4.73%
195,794.00
195,794.00

95.44 5.32%
190,877.20
1,484.00

0.78%
(4,916.80)
A1 / A
AA4.844.27
14913R3A3 Caterpillar Financial Service Note

3.6% Due 8/12/2027
250,000.00 09/13/2022

4.27%
242,635.00
242,635.00

94.46 4.89%
236,149.50
1,225.00

0.96%
(6,485.50)
A2 / A
A

4.87 4.37
023135BC9 Amazon.com Inc Callable Note Cont
5/22/2027

3.15% Due 8/22/2027
250,000.00 09/14/2022

4.17%
238,730.00
238,730.00

93.23 4.71%
233,082.25
853.13

0.95%
(5,647.75)
A1 / AA
AA4.904.44
24422EWK1 John Deere Capital Corp Note

4.15% Due 9/15/2027
250,000.00 09/13/2022

4.29%
248,480.00
248,480.00

97.09 4.82%
242,722.75
662.85

0.98%
(5,757.25)
A2 / A
A

4.96 4.41
Total Corporate 6,075,000.00 4.49%
5,877,771.50
5,877,771.50 5.07%
5,763,813.21
50,615.59

23.49%
(113,958.29)
A1 / A
A+

3.66 3.33
Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 5 Execution Time: 10/4/2022 1:20:46 PM ATTACHMENT D - Page 5 of 7
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2022
City of Stanton
Account #10991
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

MONEY MARKET FUND
31846V203 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
332,889.43 Various

2.45%
332,889.43
332,889.43

1.00 2.45%
332,889.43

0.00 1.34%

0.00 Aaa / AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Money Market Fund 332,889.43 2.45%
332,889.43
332,889.43 2.45%
332,889.43

0.00 1.34%

0.00 Aaa / AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00

US TREASURY
912828B66 US Treasury Note

2.75% Due 2/15/2024
650,000.00 09/26/2022

4.31%
636,517.58
636,517.58

97.88 4.35%
636,238.20
2,282.95

2.58%
(279.38)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

1.38 1.33
91282CEX5 US Treasury Note
3% Due 6/30/2024
650,000.00 09/15/2022

3.91%
639,818.36
639,818.36

97.84 4.29%
635,933.35
4,927.99

2.59%
(3,885.01)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

1.75 1.67
91282CFG1 US Treasury Note

3.25% Due 8/31/2024
650,000.00 09/21/2022

4.00%
640,935.55
640,935.55

98.22 4.22%
638,447.55
1,809.05

2.59%
(2,488.00)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

1.92 1.83
9128283P3 US Treasury Note

2.25% Due 12/31/2024
650,000.00 09/15/2022

3.85%
627,351.56
627,351.56

95.79 4.23%
622,603.80
3,695.99

2.53%
(4,747.76)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

2.25 2.15
9128284F4 US Treasury Note

2.625% Due 3/31/2025
650,000.00 09/14/2022

3.80%
631,667.97
631,667.97

96.19 4.25%
625,244.10

46.88 2.53%
(6,423.87)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

2.50 2.38
9128284M9 US Treasury Note

2.875% Due 4/30/2025
650,000.00 09/22/2022

4.15%
629,789.06
629,789.06

96.63 4.26%
628,113.20
7,820.31

2.57%
(1,675.86)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

2.58 2.43
91282CEU1 US Treasury Note

2.875% Due 6/15/2025
650,000.00 09/15/2022

3.89%
632,962.89
632,962.89

96.47 4.27%
627,047.20
5,514.34

2.56%
(5,915.69)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

2.71 2.55
91282CFE6 US Treasury Note

3.125% Due 8/15/2025
650,000.00 09/13/2022

3.75%
638,802.74
638,802.74

96.95 4.26%
630,195.15
2,594.26

2.56%
(8,607.59)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

2.88 2.70
91282CFK2 US Treasury Note

3.5% Due 9/15/2025
650,000.00 09/19/2022

3.90%
642,712.89
642,712.89

97.98 4.23%
636,847.90
1,005.52

2.58%
(5,864.99)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

2.96 2.77
9128286L9 US Treasury Note

2.25% Due 3/31/2026
650,000.00 09/14/2022

3.75%
617,880.86
617,880.86

93.71 4.20%
609,095.50

40.18 2.46%
(8,785.36)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

3.50 3.31
9128287B0 US Treasury Note

1.875% Due 6/30/2026
650,000.00 09/15/2022

3.78%
606,632.81
606,632.81

92.12 4.17%
598,787.15
3,079.99

2.43%
(7,845.66)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

3.75 3.54
9128282A7 US Treasury Note

1.5% Due 8/15/2026
650,000.00 09/13/2022

3.72%
597,923.83
597,923.83

90.47 4.19%
588,072.55
1,245.24

2.38%
(9,851.28)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

3.88 3.69
Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 6 Execution Time: 10/4/2022 1:20:46 PM ATTACHMENT D - Page 6 of 7
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2022
City of Stanton
Account #10991
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

US TREASURY
91282CEF4 US Treasury Note

2.5% Due 3/31/2027
650,000.00 09/14/2022

3.66%
618,591.80
618,591.80

93.47 4.10%
607,572.55

44.64 2.45%
(11,019.25)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

4.50 4.19
91282CFH9 US Treasury Note

3.125% Due 8/31/2027
650,000.00 09/13/2022

3.57%
636,822.26
636,822.26

95.97 4.04%
623,797.20
1,739.47

2.53%
(13,025.06)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

4.92 4.49
Total US Treasury 9,100,000.00 3.86%
8,798,410.16
8,798,410.16 4.22%
8,707,995.40
35,846.81

35.33%
(90,414.76)
Aaa / AA+
AAA

2.95 2.77
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 25,641,515.48 4.09%
24,913,438.35
24,913,438.35 4.47%
24,637,706.07
113,123.05
100.00%
(275,732.28)
Aa1 / AA
AAA

3.02 2.61
TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUED 24,750,829.12
Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 7 Execution Time: 10/4/2022 1:20:46 PM ATTACHMENT D - Page 7 of 7
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Successor Agency DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 2022 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY) REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Investment Report as of September 30, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of September 2022.

BACKGROUND:

The attached reports summarize the Successor Agency’s investment and deposit balances as of September 2022. During the month of September, the Successor Agency’s total cash and investment balances decreased by $10,518. The Successor Agency’s cash and investment balances by fund are presented in Attachment A. The Successor Agency’s investments and deposits by financial institution are included as Attachment B.

ANALYSIS:

The Successor Agency’s share of the City’s investment in the State Treasurer’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) continues to be available on demand. The effective yield on LAIF for the month of September 2022 was 1.51%.

The Successor Agency’s investments are shown on Attachment B and have a weighted investment yield of 1.51%, which is equal to the benchmark LAIF return of 1.51%, as the entire portfolio (excluding funds held with the bond fiscal agents) represents the Successor Agency’s portion of LAIF and Bank of the West funds invested by the City.

Item: 9E
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 With a completely liquid portfolio, the weighted average maturity of the Successor Agency’s investments on September 30, 2022, was 1 day. LAIF’s average maturity on September 30, 2022, was approximately 304 days.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All deposits and investments have been made in accordance with the City's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Investment Policy.

The portfolio will allow the Successor Agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None
LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the agenda posting process.

Prepared by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
B. Investments and Deposits
Fund/
Account No. Fund/Account Name
Beginning
Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance

CASH-POOLED
712-111101 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund $ 1,397,403.05 $ - $ (10,533.33) $ 1,386,869.72 Total Cash-Pooled (1) $ - 1,397,403.05 $ $ 1,386,869.72 (10,533.33) $ CASH-RESTRICTED (with Fiscal Agent)
712-111423 2016 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series A and B $ 1,359,744.68 $ 5.77 $ 1,359,750.45 - $ 712-111425 2016 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series C and D 1,836,140.34 7.80 - 1,836,148.14712-111426 2020 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series A 513,417.26 2.18 - 513,419.44 Total Cash-Restricted (with Fiscal Agent) $ 3,709,302.28 $ 15.75 $ 3,709,318.03 - $ TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 5,106,705.33 $ 15.75 $ (10,533.33) $ 5,096,187.75 Note:
(1) - Includes the Successor Agency's share of the City's Bank of the West checking account and Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
ATTACHMENT A Click here to return to the agenda.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENC
Y

INVESTMENTS AND DEPOSITS
Investment Issuer/ Date of Market MV
Type Institution Broker Maturit
y Cost
Value Source
LAIF and BOW General Acct State of California/ BOW State of California On Demand 1.51% N/A $ 1,386,870 $ LAIF 1,386,870 Total Cash Investments and Deposits 1 1.51% $ 1,386,870 $ 1,386,870 Weighted AverageWeighted Average
Bond Funds Held by Trustees: Maturity (days) Yield
Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturit
y Rate
Value Cost
Value Source
2016 Series A and BDebt Service:Cash Equivalents US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1,359,750 $ $ 1,359,750 $ US Bank 1,359,750 Principal: Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1 1 1 US Bank Total 2016 Series A and B $ 1,359,751 $ 1,359,751
Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturit
y Rate
Value Cost
Value Source
2016
Series
C and D
Debt Service:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1,836,146 $ $ 1,836,146 $ US Bank 1,836,146 Interest:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1 1 1 US Bank Principal: Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1 1 1 US Bank Total 2016 Series C and D $ 1,836,148 $ 1,836,148 MONTH ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
Rate
Interest

ATTACHMENT B

Page 1 of 2 ends

Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturity Rate Value Cost Value Source 2020 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Special Fund:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 513,419 $ $ 513,419 $ US Bank 513,419 Total 2020 Tax Allocation Bonds (Tax-Exempt) $ 513,419 $ 513,419 Total Bond Fund Investments and Deposits (3) $ 3,709,318 3,709,318 $ TOTAL - ALL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $5,096,188 $5,096,188 Notes: (1) - There have been no exceptions to the Investment Policy. (2) - The Successor Agency is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. (3) - Restricted Bond Funds are held by the fiscal agent.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 2 ends

2 1

CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 2022 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE
REPORT; AND STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended September 30, 2022, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund’s September 2022 Revenue and Expenditure Report and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended September 30, 2022.

ANALYSIS:

General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Reports
Attachments A and B summarize the General Fund’s revenue and expenditure activity through September 30, 2022. The reports include information for the month of June, on a year-to-date basis through September, the current fiscal year’s budgeted balance and the year-to-date as a percentage of the budget. In addition, for comparison purposes, the year-to-date amount, final amount, and a percentage of final for the previous fiscal year (through September) is included as well.

Item: 9F
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 As of September 30, total General Fund revenues received to date were approximately $2.5 million, which represents 9% of the Fiscal Year 2022/23 budgeted amount and is approximately $43,297 (2%) lower than the revenues recognized for the same period last year (Attachment A, page 2). The majority of the increase is attributed to the change in market value of the City’s investment portfolio. Through September 2022, the unrealized losses on the City’s investment portfolio increased by $73,485. It is important to note that the unrealized loss (or gain) on the City’s investment portfolio is an accounting entry and does not represent actual cash received or lost. As such, it is the City’s practice to not include an estimate in the City’s budget for unrealized losses (or gains).

Total General Fund expenditures were approximately $6.5 million through September 30, which represents 22% of the 2022/23 projected expenditures and is approximately $396,179 (6%) higher than the expenditures incurred for the same period last year (Attachment B, page 2). The Law Enforcement Division (#2100) makes up $219,796 (56%) of the cost increase through September. Contract costs paid to the Orange County Sheriff’s Department are 7% higher than the same period last fiscal year, which is consistent with the City’s 7% increase in law enforcement contract costs for the current fiscal year.

Per Attachment C, the City’s General Fund reserves and available fund balance (“discretionary fund balance”) is expected to be $26.0 million by June 30, 2023 as shown in the table below:

Estimated
Balance
at 6/30/2023
Reserves set aside per City Resolution No. 2022-34 $ 13,900,000 Committed Developer Contributions 1,476,296
Undesignated Fund Balance 10,573,836
Total Discretionary Fund Balance $ 25,950,132
Housing Authority Revenue and Expenditure Reports
Attachment D summarizes the Housing Authority Fund’s revenue and expenditure activity through September 30, 2022. The report includes information for the activity during the month of June, information on a year-to-date basis through September, the current fiscal year’s budgeted balance and the year-to-date as a percentage of the budget. In addition, for comparison purposes, the year-to-date amount, final amount, and a percentage of final for the previous fiscal year (through September) is included as well.

As of September 30, total Housing Authority Fund revenues received to date was $192,481, which represents 33% of the Fiscal Year 2022/23 budgeted amount and is $182,984 (1927%) more than the revenue collected through the same period last year. 3 Total Housing Authority Fund expenditures were $155,965 through September 30, which represents 4% of the 2022/23 estimated expenditures and is $38,373 (33%) higher than the expenditures incurred for the same period last year. The reason for both these significant fluctuations is due to a change in accounting practice of how the revenues (and expenditures) for the Tina Pacific properties are being recorded. The City’s new audit firm, Gruber and Lopez, Inc., requested the Housing Authority record the gross rental income and gross operating expenses for the Tina Pacific properties in the Housing Authority’s financial records to be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. (Prior to the closing of the Housing Authority’s books for Fiscal Year 2021/22, the Housing Authority was only recorded the net rental distributions that were received from Quality Management Group.) Staff will be reviewing the activity and proposing the necessary adjustments to expenditures (and revenues, if necessary) with the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Mid-Year Budget Update in the next calendar year.

Per Attachment E, the City’s Housing Authority Fund’s available fund balance is expected to be $9.1 million by June 30, 2023.

Status of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) (Attachment F) The Fiscal Year 2022/23 CIP budget includes $4.5 million from the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Adopted Budget; $11.3 million in carryover funding from Fiscal Year 2021/22, and additional appropriations approved by City Council since July 1, 2022, totaling $700,000, for a total amended budget of $16.5 million as of September 30, 2022. As of September 30, capital project expenditures totaled $185,337 (1% of the amended budget) with an additional $3.4 million (20% of the amended budget) under contract (encumbered) for work currently underway, for a total amount spent or encumbered to date of $3.6 million (21% of the amended budget) as of September 30, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda posting process.
4 STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED

4. Ensure Fiscal Stability and Efficiency in Governance Prepared by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. September 2022 General Fund Revenues
B. September 2022 General Fund Expenditures
C. General Fund Reserve Balances
D. September2022 Housing Authority Revenue and Expenditures E. Housing Authority Reserve Balance
F. Status of Capital Improvement Projects as of September 30, 2022 %
FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 Activity Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2021/22 From Budget Budget September Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year TAXES
Property Tax 7,983,200 $ $ 7,983,200 $ 16,904 $ 28,550 0.36% 30,600 $ ‐6.70%Sales and Use Tax 5,232,000 5,232,000 487,916 487,916 9.33% 573,412 ‐14.91%Transactions and Use Tax 5,805,000 5,805,000 543,721 543,721 9.37% 540,629 0.57% Transient Occupancy Tax 610,000 610,000 50,168 122,523 20.09% 138,674 ‐11.65%Franchise Fees 1,177,000 1,177,000 47,179 109,180 9.28% 98,133 11.26% Business Licenses 158,000 158,000 1,291 5,654 3.58% ‐ 7,225 21.74% Utility Users Tax 1,961,000 1,961,000 203,930 396,205 20.20% 352,477 12.41% Cannabis Tax 620,000 620,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **Tax Increment Pass‐thru Payment 429,450 429,450 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** TAXES‐TOTAL 23,975,650 23,975,650 1,351,109 1,693,749 7.06% 1,741,150 ‐2.72%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
County WDA Shared Revenue 100,000 100,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 101,376 ‐100.00% Mandated Cost Reimbursement 30,000 30,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** Motor Vehicle In Lieu 30,000 30,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
Public Safety Augmentation Tax 193,000 193,000 16,153 26,041 13.49% 24,308 7.13% Federal Grants ‐ ‐ 5,333 5,333 ** ‐ 100.00%
Other Grants 4,200 4,200 4,028 4,889 116.40% 1,806 170.71% INTERGOVERNMENTAL‐TOTAL 357,200 357,200 25,514 36,263 10.15% 127,490 ‐71.56%

CHARGES FOR SERVICES
Charges for Services 256,425 256,425 22,671 54,296 21.17% 25,416 113.63% Information Technology Charges 37,605 37,605 3,134 9,401 25.00% 7,586 23.93% CHARGES FOR SERVICES‐TOTAL 294,030 294,030 25,805 63,697 21.66% 33,002 93.01%

FEES AND PERMITS
Solid Waste Impact Fees 1,175,000 1,175,000 100,094 193,833 16.50% 192,433 0.73% Building Permits and Fees 1,205,000 1,205,000 39,829 186,842 15.51% 125,420 48.97% Planning Permits and Fees 104,250 104,250 4,050 33,974 32.59% 19,118 77.71% Engineering Permits and Fees 91,000 91,000 15,680 36,431 40.03% 24,271 50.10% Recycling Fees 90,500 90,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
Other Permits and Fees 225,900 226,400 10,622 34,316 15.16% 30,079 14.09%Community Services Fees 45,700 45,700 5,850 22,507 49.25% 20,386 10.40% FEES AND PERMITS ‐TOTAL 2,937,350 2,937,850 176,125 507,903 17.29% 411,707 23.37% September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2022/23

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 11 ends

%
FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 Activity Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2021/22 From Budget Budget September Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2022/23

FINES AND FORFEITURES
General Fines 700 700 80 127 18.14% ‐ 1,391 90.87% Motor Vehicle Fines 45,000 45,000 4,125 9,730 21.62% ‐ 11,415 14.76% Parking Citations 225,000 225,000 16,602 26,049 11.58% 40,403 ‐35.53% DMV Parking Collections 71,000 71,000 7,575 13,087 18.43% 13,959 ‐6.25% Administrative Citation 10,000 10,000 ‐ 3,218 32.18% 300 90.68% FINES AND FORFEITURES‐TOTAL 351,700 351,700 28,382 52,211 14.85% 67,468 ‐22.61%

USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
Investment Earnings 217,000 217,000 95,037 82,834 38.17% 44,692 ‐85.34% Unrealized Gains (Losses) ‐ ‐ (263,767) (116,827) ** ‐ (43,342) 169.55% Interest on Loan to Landscape District Fund 11,020 11,020 2,880 2,880 26.13% 7,255 60.30% Rental Income 93,335 93,335 26,048 75,860 81.28% 15,546 387.97% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY‐TOTAL 321,355 321,355 (139,802) 44,747 13.92% 24,151 85.28%MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE Miscellaneous Revenue 163,935 165,435 129 3,640 2.20% ‐ 43,693 91.67% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE‐TOTAL 163,935 165,435 129 3,640 2.20% ‐ 43,693 91.67%

TRANSFERS IN
From Gas Tax Fund 205,000 205,000 17,083 51,250 25.00% 51,250 0.00% From Protective Services Fund 382,000 382,000 ‐ 7,730 2.02% 4,576 68.92% From Supplemental Law Enforcement Grants Fund 150,000 150,000 12,500 37,500 25.00% 37,500 0.00% TRANSFERS IN‐TOTAL 737,000 737,000 29,583 96,480 13.09% 93,326 3.38% TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $ 29,138,220 $ 29,140,220 $ 1,496,845 $ 2,498,690 8.57% 2,541,987 $ ‐1.70% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund430100 Current Year‐Secured $ 1,178,100 $ 1,178,100 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.00% $ ‐ ** 430105 Current Year‐Unsecured 30,000 30,000 15,999 15,999 53.33% 18,532 ‐13.67% 430115 Property Tax‐Supplemental 20,000 20,000 905 2,037 10.19% 659 209.10% 430120 Residual Redevelopment Property Tax 1,356,600 1,356,600 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430121 In‐Lieu Vehicle License Fee 5,258,500 5,258,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **430135 Homeowners Tax Relief 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430140 Property Transfer Tax 139,000 139,000 ‐ 10,514 7.56% 11,409 ‐7.84% 430200 Sales And Use Tax 5,232,000 5,232,000 487,916 487,916 9.33% 573,412 ‐14.91% 430300 Transient Occupancy Tax 610,000 610,000 50,168 122,523 20.09% 138,674 ‐11.65% 430405 Franchise Tax/Cable TV 200,000 200,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430410 Franchise Tax/Electric 244,000 ‐ 244,000 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430415 Franchise Tax/Gas 75,000 75,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430420 Franchise Tax/Refuse 570,000 570,000 47,179 109,180 19.15% 98,133 11.26% 430425 Franchise Tax/Water 88,000 88,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430500 Business License Tax 158,000 158,000 1,291 5,654 3.58% 7,225 ‐21.74% 430600 Util User Tax/Electricity 970,000 970,000 134,685 257,424 26.54% 219,645 17.20% 430605 Util User Tax/Telephone 271,000 271,000 16,737 32,808 12.11% 33,103 ‐0.89% 430610 Util User Tax/Gas 295,000 295,000 32,423 32,800 11.12% 20,240 62.06% 430615 Util User Tax/Water 425,000 425,000 20,085 73,173 17.22% 79,489 ‐7.95% 430700 Cannabis Tax 620,000 620,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 440100 AB 1389 Pass Through from RDA 429,450 ‐ 429,450 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 101 General Fund 18,170,650 18,170,650 807,388 1,150,028 6.33% 1,200,521 ‐4.21% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)430250 Transactions & Use Tax 5,805,000 5,805,000 543,721 543,721 9.37% 540,629 0.57% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) 5,805,000 5,805,000 543,721 543,721 9.37% 540,629 0.57% TAXES ‐ TOTAL $ 23,975,650 $ 23,975,650 $ 1,351,109 $ 1,693,749 7.06% $ 1,741,150 ‐2.72% TAXES
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 3 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund433100 Charges For Services $ 256,425 $ 256,425 $ 22,671 $ 54,296 21.17% 25,416 $ 113.63% 433136 Information Technology Charges 37,605 37,605 3,134 9,401 25.00% 7,586 23.93% CHARGES FOR SERVICES ‐ TOTAL $ 294,030 $ 294,030 $ 25,805 $ 63,697 21.66% $ 33,002 93.01%

CHARGES FOR SERVICES
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 4 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund432121 County WDA Shared Revenue $ 100,000 100,000$ $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.00% $ 101,376 ‐100.00% 432135 Mandated Cost Reimbursement 30,000 30,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 432150 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 30,000 30,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **432180 Public Safety Augmentation Tax 193,000 193,000 16,153 26,041 13.49% 24,308 7.13% 432256 Other Grants 4,200 4,200 4,028 4,889 116.40% 1,806 170.71%432270 Federal Grants ‐ ‐ 5,333 5,333 ** ‐ 100.00% INTERGOVERNMENTAL ‐ TOTAL $ 357,200 $ 357,200 $ 25,514 $ 36,263 10.15% $ ‐ 127,490 71.56%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 5 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund431100 Building Plan Check Fees $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,143 $ 38,720 22.13% $ 22,469 72.33% 431105 Mechanical Permits 100,000 100,000 3,908 14,663 14.66% 10,285 42.57% 431110 Building Permits 750,000 750,000 22,903 94,577 12.61% 63,998 47.78% 431115 Plumbing Permits 80,000 80,000 2,795 13,850 17.31% 4,720 193.43% 431120 Electrical Permits 100,000 100,000 9,080 25,032 25.03% 23,948 4.53% 431130 Engineering Plan Check Fees 51,000 51,000 2,775 9,310 18.25% ‐ 9,830 5.59% 431135 Public Works Permits 40,000 40,000 12,905 27,121 67.80% 14,441 87.81% 431140 S M I P ‐ Commercial Fees 400 400 3.000 3.000 0.75% ‐ 6 50.00% 431145 S M I P‐Residential Permits 500 500 12.000 12.000 2.40% 8 50.00% 431146 SB 1473 Fee 2,500 2,500 45 103 4.12% ‐ 150 31.33%431160 Solid Waste Impact Fees 1,175,000 1,175,000 100,094 193,833 16.50% 192,433 0.73% 431180 P/W Inspections ‐ ‐ 1,873 4,059 ** ‐ 100.00%
431185 Parking Permits 10,000 10,000 1,075 3,516 35.16% 1,282 174.26% 431190 Towing Franchise Fee 25,000 25,000 1,170 8,190 32.76% 7,920 3.41% 431195 Other Fees & Permits 15,000 15,500 3,235 7,322 47.24% 6,715 9.04% 431201 Cannabis Business Renewal Permit Fee 10,000 10,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 433200 Conditional Use Permit 7,000 7,000 ‐ 2,160 30.86% ‐ 2,485 13.08% 433205 Precise Plan Of Design 15,000 15,000 3,070 16,400 109.33% 1,050 1461.90% 433220 Preliminary Plan Review 8,000 8,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 3,750 100.00% 433225 Environmental Services 4,400 4,400 75 525 11.93% 355 32.38% 433227 Foreclosure Registration 10,850 10,850 ‐ 1,689 15.57% 1,689 0.00%433230 Zoning Entitlements 5,000 5,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 433235 Land Divisions 10,000 10,000 ‐ 2,500 25.00% 2,500 0.00% 433240 Special Event Permits 500 500 180 360 72.00% ‐ 100.00% 433245 Sign/Ban'R/Gar Sa/Temp Use Per 6,000 6,000 110 905 15.08% ‐ 2,100 56.90% 433250 Ministerial Services 12,000 12,000 60 4,115 34.29% ‐ 4,265 3.52% 433260 Landscape Plan Check 1,000 1,000 ‐ 975 97.50% 325 66.67% 433270 General Plan Maint Surcharge 15,000 15,000 735 2,520 16.80% 210 1100.00% 433285 Other Developmental Fees 5,000 5,000 ‐ 2,185 43.70% 389 82.20% 433305 General Recreation Programs 24,000 24,000 3,125 17,624 73.43% 12,981 35.77%

FEES AND PERMITS
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23

ATTACHMENT A

Page 6 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund

FEES AND PERMITS
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
433315 Sports Fields 21,700 21,700 2,725 4,883 22.50% ‐ 7,405 34.06% 437115 Recycling Fees 90,500 90,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
430505 New/Moved Bus Lic Appl Rev 37,000 37,000 2,610 7,870 21.27% ‐ 9,530 17.42% 430510 Business Tax Renewal Process 128,000 128,000 310 2,400 1.88% ‐ 4,340 44.70% 430515 SB 1186 2,000 2,000 109 481 24.05% 128 275.78%
FEES AND PERMITS ‐ TOTAL $ 2,937,350 $ 2,937,850 $ 176,125 $ 507,903 17.29% $ 411,707 23.37% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 7 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund434100 General Fines $ 700 $ 700 $ 80 $ 127 18.14% $ ‐ 1,391 90.87% 434105 Motor Vehicle Fines 45,000 45,000 4,125 9,730 21.62% 11,415 ‐14.76% 434110 Parking Citations 225,000 225,000 16,602 26,049 11.58% 40,403 ‐35.53% 434115 DMV Parking Collections 71,000 71,000 7,575 13,087 18.43% 13,959 ‐6.25%434120 Administrative Citations 10,000 10,000 ‐ 3,218 32.18% 300 90.68% FINES AND FORFEITURES ‐ TOTAL $ 351,700 $ 351,700 $ 28,382 $ 52,211 14.85% $ ‐ 67,468 22.61%

FINES AND FORFEITURES
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 8 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund435100 Interest Earned $ 217,000 $ 217,000 $ 95,037 $ 82,834 38.17% $ ‐ 44,692 85.34% 435110 Unrealized Gains (Losses) ‐ ‐ (263,767) (116,827) ** ‐ (43,342) 169.55%435200 Interest on Loan to Landscape District Fund 11,020 11,020 2,880 2,880 26.13% ‐ 7,255 60.30% 436125 Indoor Facility Rental 55,000 55,000 22,070 56,761 103.20% 320 17637.81% 436127 Picnic Shelters 16,450 16,450 2,190 11,948 72.63% 8,365 42.83%436135 Pac Bell Mobile Svcs‐Rent 21,885 21,885 1,788 7,151 32.68% 6,861 4.23% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY ‐ TOTAL $ 321,355 $ 321,355 $ (139,802) $ 44,747 13.92% $ ‐ 24,151 85.28%

USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23

ATTACHMENT A

Page 9 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year101 General Fund437100 Sale Of Publications $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 1 ** $ 120 ‐99.17% 437105 Firework Services 475 475 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
437110 Candidate Statements ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,508 ** ‐ 100.00% 437125 Donations ‐ 1,500 ‐ ‐ ** 300 **
437135 Expense Reimbursement ‐ ‐ 69 69 ** 39,292 ‐99.82% 437137 Loan Repayment from Landscape Maintenance District 133,460 133,460 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 437195 Other Revenue 30,000 30,000 60 2,062 6.87% ‐ 3,981 48.20% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE ‐ TOTAL $ 163,935 $ 165,435 $ 129 $ 3,640 2.20% $ ‐ 43,693 91.67%

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 10 of 11 ends

FY 2022/23 FY 2022/23 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2021/22 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget September Actual * % of Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund439211 Transfer From Gas Tax Fund $ 205,000 $ 205,000 $ 17,083 $ 51,250 25.00% $ 51,250 0.00% 439223 Transfer From Protective Services Fund 382,000 382,000 ‐ 7,730 2.02% 4,576 68.92% 439242 Transfer Fr Supp Law Enf Grant 150,000 150,000 12,500 37,500 25.00% 37,500 0.00% TRANSFERS IN ‐ TOTAL $ 737,000 $ 737,000 $ 29,583 $ 96,480 13.09% $ 93,326 3.38%

TRANSFERS IN
September 2022 General Fund Revenues (25% of year)
FY 2022/23

ATTACHMENT A

Page 11 of 11 ends

Division
No. Description
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
Percent of
Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
1100 City Council 137,875 $ $ 136,015 $ 13,557 $ 43,363 31.88% 40,950 $ 5.89% 1200 City Attorney 275,000 275,000 293 293 0.11% 420 ‐30.24% 1300 City Manager 603,900 619,300 53,354 106,808 17.25% 119,410 ‐10.55%1400 City Clerk 241,880 241,880 8,627 36,500 15.09% ‐ 46,496 21.50%1410 Personnel/Risk Management 207,435 207,435 21,897 45,780 22.07% 37,348 22.58% 1510 Information Technology 683,135 690,210 62,058 226,003 32.74% 183,771 22.98% Administration 2,149,225 2,169,840 159,786 458,747 21.14% 428,395 7.09% 1500 Finance 977,075 982,750 104,904 225,551 22.95% 198,895 13.40% 1600 Non‐Dept (excludes Transfers) 315,000 315,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** Finance 1,292,075 1,297,750 104,904 225,551 17.38% 198,895 13.40% 1520 Emergency Preparedness 5,000 9,175 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 7,087 100.00% 2100 Law Enforcement 13,071,380 13,071,380 1,097,096 3,264,860 24.98% 3,045,064 7.22% 2200 Fire Protection 5,306,190 5,306,190 1,315,788 1,315,788 24.80% 1,283,387 2.52% 2230 Contractual Ambulance Svcs 2,500 2,500 330 330 13.20% ‐ 100.00% 2400 Animal Control Services 200,965 200,965 ‐ 16,207 8.06% ‐ 46,305 65.00%2500 Public Safety‐Other 117,310 117,310 9,080 42,052 35.85% ‐ 49,155 14.45%4300 Parking Control 246,585 246,585 23,152 47,716 19.35% ‐ 59,763 20.16%6200 Code Enforcement 637,030 637,030 68,696 141,193 22.16% 117,825 19.83% Public Safety 19,586,960 19,635,070 2,514,142 4,828,146 24.59% 4,608,586 4.76% 3000 Public Works Administration 560,850 560,850 61,289 151,663 27.04% 108,793 39.41% 3100 Engineering 258,665 262,550 14,146 42,903 16.34% 33,902 26.55% 3200 Public Facilities 816,040 812,840 67,814 124,296 15.29% 74,109 67.72%3300 Crossing Guard 45,165 45,165 758 2,349 5.20% ‐ 3,966 40.77% 3400 Parks Maintenance 466,110 466,110 40,710 71,822 15.41% ‐ 83,941 14.44% 3500 Street Maintenance 508,135 508,135 32,420 76,516 15.06% ‐ 80,651 5.13% 3600 Storm Drains 129,860 130,360 583 583 0.45% ‐ 100.00% 6300 Graffiti Abatement 110,370 110,370 7,847 16,843 15.26% 9,326 80.60% Public Works 2,895,195 2,896,380 225,567 486,975 16.81% 394,688 23.38% City of Stanton
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
% Change
from Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 1 of 24 ends

Division
No. Description
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
Percent of
Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
City of Stanton
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
% Change
from Prior
Year
4000 Community Development Administration 308,915 308,915 27,713 104,415 33.80% 97,366 7.24% 4100 Planning 511,660 594,575 41,928 65,662 11.04% ‐ 86,349 23.96%4200 Building Regulation 524,990 524,990 9,260 21,225 4.04% ‐ 37,026 42.68%4400 Business Relations 37,800 37,800 137 707 1.87% ‐ 100.00% Community Development 1,383,365 1,466,280 79,038 192,009 13.09% 220,741 ‐13.02% 5000 Public Information Office 143,875 138,660 12,641 25,538 18.42% 25,079 1.83%5100 Community Services Administration 583,020 587,720 51,788 170,663 29.04% 144,152 18.39% 5200 Community Center Operations 202,300 202,300 10,503 24,223 11.97% 19,244 25.87% 5300 Park Operations 238,925 238,925 29,534 61,319 25.66% 48,793 25.67%5400 Senior Citizen Programs 67,360 67,360 5,381 11,136 16.53% ‐ 15,281 27.13% 5500 Recreation Programs 54,310 54,310 6,366 20,603 37.94% 15,646 31.68% Community Services 1,289,790 1,289,275 116,213 313,482 24.31% 268,195 16.89% Transfer to FACT Grant 46,470 46,470 9,670 9,670 20.81% 4,275 126.20% Transfer to Senior Transportation Fund 11,045 11,045 1,092 2,310 20.91% 1,451 59.20% Transfer to SCP Maintenance 59,200 59,200 4,933 14,800 25.00% 10,285 43.90% Transfer to Capital Projects Fund 180,000 180,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** Transfers to Other Funds 296,715 296,715 15,695 26,780 9.03% 16,011 67.26% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 28,893,325 $ 29,051,310 $ 3,215,345 $ 6,531,690 22.48% 6,135,511 $ 6.46% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 2 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
101 General Fund1100 City Council501105 Salaries‐Elected $ 52,200 $ 52,200 5,985$ $ 14,091 26.99% 14,041 $ 0.36% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 805 805 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 502120 Medicare/Fica 760 760 87 203 26.71% 203 0.00%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 750 750 61 122 16.27% 273 ‐55.31% 602100 Special Dept Expense 10,000 10,000 447 2,925 29.25% 3,656 ‐19.99% 602110 Office Expense 2,000 2,000 98 98 4.90% 20 390.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 37,695 37,695 5,679 22,335 59.25% 18,368 21.60% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 11,000 11,000 1,200 1,200 10.91% 1,571 ‐23.62% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 2,665 2,665 ‐ 2,389 89.64% 2,815 ‐15.13% 702100 Furniture‐Office 20,000 18,140 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **1100 City Council Total 137,875 136,015 13,557 43,363 31.88% 40,950 5.89% 1200 City Attorney608105 Professional Services 275,000 275,000 293 293 0.11% 420 ‐30.24% 1200 City Attorney Total 275,000 275,000 293 293 0.11% 420 ‐30.24% 1300 City Manager501110 Salaries‐Regular 373,615 383,750 31,691 51,781 13.49% 59,054 ‐12.32% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 40 ‐100.00% 502100 Retirement 85,485 90,235 8,509 14,108 15.63% 14,948 ‐5.62% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,215 5,600 583 953 17.02% 1,169 ‐18.48%502110 Health/Life Insurance 42,460 42,460 2,659 4,133 9.73% 5,899 ‐29.94% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ ‐ 150 ** 255 ‐41.18% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 360 360 ‐ 137 38.06% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/Fica 4,945 5,075 446 727 14.33% 853 ‐14.77% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,245 2,245 279 456 20.31% 520 ‐12.31% 602110 Office Expense 10,700 10,700 657 1,253 11.71% 481 160.50% 602115 Postage 250 250 1 5 2.00% 2 150.00%
1300 City Manager, Continued
Administration ‐ Vazquez
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 3 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
Administration ‐ Vazquez
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
% Change
From Prior
Year
602120 Books/Periodicals 150 150 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607100 Membership/Dues 1,000 1,000 432 432 43.20% 926 ‐53.35% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 5,600 5,600 (75) 600 10.71% 446 34.53% 608105 Professional Services 48,000 48,000 8,000 12,000 25.00% 12,000 0.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 2,060 2,060 172 515 25.00% 175 194.29% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 21,815 21,815 ‐ 19,558 89.65% 22,642 ‐13.62% 1300 City Manager Total 603,900 619,300 53,354 106,808 17.25% 119,410 ‐10.55% 1400 City Clerk501110 Salaries‐Regular 119,885 119,885 13,321 26,642 22.22% 25,201 5.72% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 59 ‐100.00% 502100 Retirement 38,960 38,960 4,678 9,357 24.02% 8,483 10.30% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,780 1,780 245 490 27.53% 499 ‐1.80% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 18,610 18,610 1,575 3,935 21.14% 3,845 2.34% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 175 175 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,670 1,670 188 374 22.40% 354 5.65% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 985 985 117 234 23.76% 222 5.41% 602110 Office Expense 2,250 2,250 ‐ 180 8.00% 691 ‐73.95% 602115 Postage 500 500 49 122 24.40% 121 0.83%602120 Books/Periodicals 100 100 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607100 Membership/Dues 1,130 ‐ 1,130 415 36.73% 215 93.02% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 750 750 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 70 ‐100.00% 608105 Professional Services 6,000 6,000 (11,590) ‐ (10,810) 180.17% 780 ‐1485.90% 608140 Elections 40,000 40,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 530 530 44 133 25.09% 145 ‐8.28% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 6,055 6,055 ‐ 5,428 89.64% 5,811 ‐6.59% 1400 City Clerk Total 241,880 241,880 8,627 36,500 15.09% 46,496 ‐21.50% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 4 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
Administration ‐ Vazquez
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
% Change
From Prior
Year
1510 Information Technology501110 Salaries‐Regular 87,950 87,950 9,771 19,543 22.22% 18,239 7.15% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 10,000 10,000 2,341 4,702 47.02% 2,064 127.81% 502100 Retirement Charges 28,020 28,020 3,432 7,095 25.32% 6,024 17.78% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,250 1,250 180 384 30.72% 361 6.37% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 15,740 15,740 1,329 3,319 21.09% 3,237 2.53% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 160 160 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,230 1,230 167 330 26.83% 273 20.88% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 805 805 86 184 22.86% 161 14.29% 602140 Materials & Supplies 30,000 30,000 1,888 2,813 9.38% 927 203.45% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 50,000 50,000 11,161 12,781 25.56% 2,905 339.97% 604100 Communications 125,900 125,900 10,298 17,554 13.94% 11,196 56.79%608100 Contractual Services 284,750 286,610 3,729 134,720 47.00% 133,747 0.73% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 5,555 5,555 463 1,389 25.00% ‐ 100.00% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 4,435 4,435 ‐ 3,976 89.65% 4,257 ‐6.60% 701050 Computer Software 37,340 42,555 17,213 17,213 40.45% 380 4429.74% 1510 Information Technology Total 683,135 690,210 62,058 226,003 32.74% 183,771 22.98% TOTAL ADMINISTRATION‐VAZQUEZ 1,941,79 $ 0 $ 1,962,405 $ 137,889 $ 412,967 21.04% 391,04 $ 7 5.61% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 5 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description
101 General Fund1410 Personnel/Risk Management501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 112,130 $ 112,130 $ 12,066 $ 24,132 21.52% 20,228$ 19.30% 502100 Retirement 24,615 24,615 2,983 5,966 24.24% 4,727 26.21% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,600 1,600 222 444 27.75% 401 10.72% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 15,740 15,740 1,342 3,353 21.30% 2,760 21.49% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 300 ‐100.00%
502115 Unemployment Insurance 160 160 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **502120 Medicare/FICA 1,550 1,550 170 339 21.87% 297 12.39% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 965 965 106 212 21.97% 178 16.04% 602110 Office Expense 1,400 1,400 558 611 43.64% 33 94.60% 602115 Postage 200 200 14 41 20.50% 26 36.59%607100 Membership/Dues 725 725 ‐ 150 20.69% 425 ‐183.33% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 2,000 2,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **607115 Training 6,000 6,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **607120 Education Reimbursement Program 10,000 10,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608105 Professional Services 10,000 10,000 3,466 4,409 44.09% 853 80.65% 608125 Advertising/ Business Dev't 2,200 2,200 375 375 17.05% 723 ‐92.80% 609125 Employee/Volunteer Recognition 12,000 12,000 554 554 4.62% 1,430 ‐158.12% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 495 495 41 124 25.05% 153 ‐23.39% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 5,655 5,655 ‐ 5,070 89.66% 4,814 5.05% TOTAL ADMINISTRATION‐GUZMAN 207,435 $ $ 207,435 $ 21,897 $ 45,780 22.07% 37,34 $ 8 22.58% Administration ‐ Guzman
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
% of Budget Actual*
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 6 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
101 General Fund1500 Finance501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 510,195 $ 510,195 $ 64,140 $ 120,293 23.58% 105,324 $ 14.21% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 500 500 75 133 26.60% 38.000 250.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 69,350 69,350 6,107 12,458 17.96% 10,268 21.33% 502100 Retirement 130,660 130,660 16,837 32,653 24.99% 28,222 15.70% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 8,470 8,470 1,293 2,444 28.85% 2,289 6.77% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 49,700 49,700 4,119 10,290 20.70% 10,066 2.23% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,350 4,350 468 1,155 26.55% 1,515 ‐23.76% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,200 1,200 78 157 13.08% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 8,040 8,040 890 1,669 20.76% 1,445 15.50%502130 Other Benefit Charges 4,875 4,875 567 1,065 21.85% 932 14.27%602110 Office Expense 8,000 8,000 49 49 0.61% 501 ‐90.22% 602115 Postage 5,000 5,000 120 326 6.52% 336 ‐2.98%
602120 Books/Periodicals 450 450 65 65 14.44% ‐ 100.00%607100 Membership/Dues 795 795 500 595 74.84% ‐ 100.00% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 4,500 4,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 444 ‐100.00% 607115 Training 1,700 1,700 454 774 45.53% ‐ 100.00% 608105 Professional Services 107,500 113,175 5,413 5,963 5.27% 10,254 ‐41.85% 608107 Financial Services 17,600 17,600 3,170 4,904 27.86% 291 1585.22% 611116 Payment to Other Agencies 1,900 ‐ 1,900 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 3,105 3,105 259 776 24.99% 305 154.43% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 32,885 32,885 ‐ 29,482 89.65% 26,665 10.56% 1500 Finance Total 970,775 976,450 104,604 225,251 23.07% 198,895 13.25% 1600 Non‐Departmental610235 Economic Development Loan Repayment 125,000 125,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **611105 Revenue Sharing‐City of Anaheim 40,000 40,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 1600 Non‐Departmental Total 165,000 165,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 101 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 1,135,775 $ 1,141,450 $ 104,604 $ 225,251 19.73% 198,895 $ 13.25% Finance‐Bannigan
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 7 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
Finance‐Bannigan
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)1500 Finance608105 Professional Services 6,300 6,300 300 300 4.76% ‐ 100.00%1500 Finance Total 6,300 6,300 300 300 4.76% ‐ 100.00% 1600 Non‐Departmental
610235 Economic Development Loan Repayment 150,000 ‐ 150,000 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 1600 Non‐Departmental Total 150,000 150,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 102 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TOTAL $ 156,300 $ 156,300 $ 300.000 $ 300.000 0.19% $ ‐ ** TOTAL FINANCE $ 1,292,075 $ 1,297,750 $ 104,904 $ 225,551 17.38% 198,895 $ 13.40% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 8 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
101 General Fund1520 Emergency Services602140 Materials & Supplies $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.00% $ ‐ 55 100.00% 608105 Professional Services ‐ 4,175 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 7,032 100.00% 1520 Emergency Services 5,000 9,175 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 7,087 100.00% 2100 Law Enforcement
602100 Special Dept Expense 1,500 1,500 458 458 30.53% ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 4,000 4,000 528 1,175 29.38% 453 159.38% 602145 Gas/Oil/Lube 3,000 3,000 ‐ 59 1.97% 24 145.83% 604100 Communications 39,100 39,100 7,769 7,769 19.87% 6,007 29.33% 608100 Contractual Services 18,155 18,155 4,539 4,539 25.00% ‐ 4,587 1.05% 608160 O.C.S.D. Contract 9,151,370 9,151,370 762,614 2,287,296 24.99% 2,150,387 6.37% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 5,555 5,555 463 1,389 25.00% ‐ 2,175 36.14% 2100 Law Enforcement Total 9,222,680 9,222,680 776,371 2,302,685 24.97% 2,163,633 6.43% 2200 Fire Protection602100 Special Department Expense 43,000 43,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608185 O.C.F.A. Contract 3,463,190 3,463,190 862,570 862,570 24.91% 927,643 ‐7.01% 2200 Fire Protection Total 3,506,190 3,506,190 862,570 862,570 24.60% 927,643 ‐7.01% 2230 Ambulance Services608190 Contractual Ambulance Svcs 2,500 2,500 330 330 13.20% ‐ 100.00% 2230 Ambulance Services Total 2,500 2,500 330 330 13.20% ‐ 100.00% 2400 Animal Control Services608170 Animal Control Services 200,965 200,965 ‐ 16,207 8.06% ‐ 46,305 65.00% 2400 Animal Control Services Total 200,965 200,965 ‐ 16,207 8.06% ‐ 46,305 65.00% 2500 Public Safety‐Other501110 Salaries‐Regular 66,015 66,015 6,806 13,682 20.73% ‐ 16,995 19.49% 502100 Retirement Charges 14,530 14,530 1,749 3,511 24.16% 2,987 17.54% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 895 895 125 252 28.16% 245 2.86%2500 Public Safety‐Other, Continued % Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Actual*
Public Safety‐Wren
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 9 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Actual*
Public Safety‐Wren
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
502110 Health/Life Insurance 45 45 35 88 195.56% ‐ 89 1.12% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,100 2,100 175 438 20.86% ‐ 525 16.57% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 55 55 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 502120 Medicare/FICA 890 890 101 205 23.03% 187 9.63%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 385 385 60 120 31.17% 109 10.09% 602110 Office Expense 1,200 1,200 29 193 16.08% 52 271.15% 602115 Postage 250 250 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ 1 100.00% 602130 Clothing 4,500 4,500 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 602140 Materials & Supplies ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ ** ‐ 64 100.00%607115 Training 700 700 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608100 Contractual Services 4,680 4,680 ‐                 4,678 99.96% 4,678 0.00% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 21,065 21,065 ‐                 18,885 89.65%                 ‐ 23,223 18.68% 2500 Public Safety‐Other Total 117,310 117,310 9,080 42,052 35.85%                 ‐ 49,155 14.45% 4300 Parking Control501110 Salaries‐Regular 131,575 131,575 14,094 28,565 21.71%                 ‐ 33,532 14.81% 502115 Salaries‐Overtime 100 100 ‐ 50 50.00% 33 51.52% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 14,250 14,250 1,605 3,314 23.26% 3,165 4.71% 502100 Retirement 40,415 40,415 4,705 9,547 23.62% ‐ 9,961 4.16% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,135 2,135 289 610 28.57% ‐ 727 16.09% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 7,980 7,980 729 1,823 22.84% ‐ 2,769 34.16% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,140 4,140 351 868 20.97% ‐ 1,035 16.14% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 300 300 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,075 2,075 231 471 22.70% ‐ 543 13.26% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,290 1,290 125 254 19.69% ‐ 297 14.48% 602110 Office Expense 4,500 4,500 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ 2,590 100.00% 602115 Postage 500 500 22 67 13.40% ‐ 76 11.84%
602130 Clothing ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ ** ‐ 129 100.00% 4300 Parking Control, Continued604100 Communications 660 660 446 481 72.88% 35 1274.29% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 10 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Actual*
Public Safety‐Wren
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
608105 Professional Services 30,000 30,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 3,096 100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 6,665 6,665 555 1,666 25.00% ‐ 1,775 6.14% 4300 Parking Control Total 246,585 246,585 23,152 47,716 19.35% ‐ 59,763 20.16% 6200 Code Enforcement501110 Salaries‐Regular 406,370 406,370 44,453 89,542 22.03% 75,899 17.98% 502115 Salaries‐Overtime 100 100 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 14 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 14,250 14,250 1,604 3,314 23.26% 3,165 4.71% 502100 Retirement 107,805 107,805 12,964 26,093 24.20% 21,296 22.53% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 6,150 6,150 847 1,709 27.79% 1,565 9.20% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 46,385 46,385 4,000 10,096 21.77% 8,945 12.87% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,560 4,560 386 956 20.96% ‐ 1,140 16.14% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 775 775 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 502120 Medicare/FICA 5,865 5,865 665 1,338 22.81% 1,143 17.06% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 3,590 3,590 392 790 22.01% 670 17.91% 602110 Office Expense 1,500 1,500 560 878 58.53% ‐ 100.00% 602115 Postage 1,000 1,000 11 144 14.40% ‐ 307 53.09% 602160 Code Enforcement Equipment 6,000 6,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 108 100.00%603105 Equipment Maintenance 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607100 Membership/Dues 570 570 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 425 425 42.50% ‐ 100.00%608100 Contractual Services 4,000 4,000 630 630 15.75% 630 0.00% 608105 Professional Services 5,000 5,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 678 100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 21,110 21,110 1,759 5,278 25.00% 2,265 133.02%6200 Code Enforcement Total 637,030 637,030 68,696 141,193 22.16% 117,825 19.83% 101 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 13,938,260 $ 13,986,370 $ 1,740,199 $ 3,412,753 24.40% 3,371,411 $ 1.23% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 11 of 24 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 12 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
101 General Fund3000 Public Works Administration501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 362,485 $ 362,485 $ 43,581 $ 82,641 22.80% 51,574 $ 60.24% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 20,430 20,430 1,527 4,464 21.85% 4,055 10.09%502100 Retirement Charges 82,100 82,100 9,595 19,594 23.87% 12,481 56.99% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,455 5,455 830 1,549 28.40% 1,101 40.69% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 30,250 30,250 3,729 7,532 24.90% 5,952 26.55%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 6,000 6,000 125 875 14.58% 650 34.62% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 645 645 109 176 27.29% 224 ‐27.27% 502120 Medicare/FICA 5,260 5,260 647 1,255 23.86% 800 56.88%502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,945 2,945 384 728 24.72% 456 59.65%602110 Office Expense 2,000 2,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 602115 Postage 100 100 121 121 121.00% 1 12000.00%
602120 Books/Periodicals 200 200 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607100 Membership/Dues 750 750 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,300 1,300 178 521 40.08% ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 5,555 5,555 463 1,389 25.00% ‐ 100.00%612115 Liability Insurance Charge 34,375 34,375 ‐ 30,818 89.65% 31,499 ‐2.16% 3000 Public Works Administration Total 560,850 560,850 61,289 151,663 27.04% 108,793 39.41% 3100 Engineering501110 Salaries‐Regular 58,380 58,380 7,272 14,627 25.05% 12,422 17.75%501115 Salaries‐Overtime 300 300 1,919 3,083 1027.67% ‐ 100.00%502100 Retirement 13,730 13,730 1,812 3,798 27.66% 2,312 64.27%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 885 885 134 285 32.20% 246 15.85% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 8,240 8,240 563 1,487 18.05% 666 123.27% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ 20 50 ** ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 105 105 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 3100 Engineering, Continued
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 13 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
502120 Medicare/FICA 835 835 133 257 30.78% 177 45.20%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 535 535 64 136 25.42% 109 24.77%602110 Office Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 53 ‐100.00% 602115 Postage ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 8 ‐100.00% 602120 Books/Periodicals ‐ ‐ 159 159 ** ‐ 100.00%602140 Materials & Supplies 2,500 2,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 365 ‐100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 950 950 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 600 ‐100.00% 608110 Engineering Services 129,240 133,125 1,515 17,355 13.04% 15,987 8.56% 608120 Plan Checking Services 33,300 33,300 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 766 ‐100.00% 608135 Microfilming 3,000 3,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 6,665 6,665 555 1,666 25.00% 170 880.00%3100 Engineering Total 258,665 262,550 14,146 42,903 16.34% 33,902 26.55% 3200 Public Facilities501110 Salaries‐Regular 23,510 23,510 9,514 18,274 77.73% 14,280 27.97%501115 Salaries‐Overtime 2,000 2,000 247 417 20.85% 204 104.41%502100 Retirement 5,310 5,310 2,352 4,544 85.57% 3,332 36.37%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 345 345 175 339 98.26% 283 19.79% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 4,790 4,790 943 2,044 42.67% 1,721 18.77% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 80 80 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 34 ‐100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 330 330 141 271 82.12% 210 29.05%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 220 220 84 162 73.64% 126 28.57% 602100 Special Dept Expense 7,885 7,885 ‐ 29 0.37% 16 44.83%602110 Office Expense 1,100 1,100 138 138 12.55% ‐ 100.00% 602130 Clothing 5,625 5,625 1,205 2,055 36.53% 1,189 72.83%602135 Safety Equipment 500 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 602140 Materials & Supplies 8,000 8,000 111 225 2.81% 780 ‐71.15%603105 Equipment Maintenance ‐ 18,870 5,207 10,226 54.19% ‐ 100.00%3200 Public Facilities, Continued 603110 Building Maintenance 129,740 126,945 7,763 18,277 14.40% 7,149 155.66% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 14 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
604100 Communications 40,000 40,000 71 415 1.04% 1,276 ‐67.48% 604105 Utilities 170,000 170,000 21,375 39,981 23.52% 29,311 36.40% 608100 Contractual Services 165,800 162,600 15,479 17,873 10.99% 13,283 34.56% 611110 O.C. Sanitation District User Fee 14,700 14,700 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 36,105 36,105 3,009 9,026 25.00% 915 886.45%701105 Equipment‐General 200,000 169,060 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 704100 Equipment‐General ‐ 14,865 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 3200 Public Facilities Total 816,040 812,840 67,814 124,296 15.29% 74,109 67.72% 3300 Crossing Guard608175 Crossing Guard Services 45,165 45,165 758 2,349 5.20% 3,966 ‐40.77% 3300 Crossing Guard Total 45,165 45,165 758 2,349 5.20% 3,966 ‐40.77% 3400 Parks Maintenance501110 Salaries‐Regular 85,165 85,165 10,108 18,758 22.03% 18,130 3.46% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 3,000 3,000 104 534 17.80% 1,034 ‐48.36%502100 Retirement 18,700 18,700 2,487 4,663 24.94% 4,211 10.73%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,220 1,220 186 350 28.69% 359 ‐2.51% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 11,055 11,055 963 2,403 21.74% 2,744 ‐12.43% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 840 840 70 175 20.83% 193 ‐9.33% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 220 220 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 30 ‐100.00%502120 Medicare/Fica 1,160 1,160 149 282 24.31% 281 0.36%502130 Other Benefit Charges 760 760 89 167 21.97% 160 4.38% 602100 Special Dept Expense 7,000 7,000 27 617 8.81% ‐ 100.00% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 17,000 17,000 ‐ 660 3.88% 4,698 ‐85.95% 604105 Utilities 180,000 180,000 15,496 27,176 15.10% 27,896 ‐2.58%605100 Land Lease 5,000 5,000 ‐ 2,661 53.22% 2,661 0.00% 608100 Contractual Services 126,100 126,100 10,290 11,154 8.85% 20,430 ‐45.40% 3400 Parks Maintenance, Continued612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 8,890 8,890 741 2,222 24.99% 1,114 99.46% 3400 Parks Maintenance Total 466,110 466,110 40,710 71,822 15.41% 83,941 ‐14.44% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 15 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
3500 Street Maintenance501110 Salaries‐Regular 114,550 114,550 7,482 18,803 16.41% 22,856 ‐17.73% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 6,000 6,000 209 908 15.13% 1,260 ‐27.94% 3500 Street Maintenance, Continued
502100 Retirement 26,235 26,235 1,842 4,702 17.92% 5,222 ‐9.96% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,705 1,705 138 354 20.76% 453 ‐21.85% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 14,455 14,455 814 2,621 18.13% 3,143 ‐16.61% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,310 2,310 193 481 20.82% 529 ‐9.07% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 330 330 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 45 ‐100.00%502120 Medicare/FICA 1,650 1,650 114 293 17.76% 357 ‐17.93% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,070 1,070 66 169 15.79% 201 ‐15.92% 602100 Special Dept Expense 3,000 3,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 602125 Small Tools 4,000 4,000 ‐ 60 1.50% ‐ 100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies 65,000 65,000 4,822 6,364 9.79% 1,543 312.44% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 2,000 2,000 137 137 6.85% 610 ‐77.54% 608100 Contractual Services 195,000 195,000 15,700 38,916 19.96% 39,874 ‐2.40% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 10,830 10,830 903 2,708 25.00% 4,558 ‐40.59% 710190 Pavement Maintenance 60,000 60,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 3500 Street Maintenance Total 508,135 508,135 32,420 76,516 15.06% 80,651 ‐5.13% 3600 Storm Drain Maintenance603100 Emergency Maintenance Services 10,000 10,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608100 Contractual Services ‐ 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608155 Storm Water Monitor Program 119,860 119,860 583 583 0.49% ‐ ** 3600 Storm Drain Maintenance Total 129,860 130,360 583 583 0.45% ‐ ** * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 16 of 24 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 17 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
101 General Fund4000 Community Development Administration501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 189,955 $ 189,955 $ 20,344 $ 40,912 21.54% 38,369 $ 6.63% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 50 ‐100.00% 502100 Retirement Charges 43,370 43,370 5,193 10,424 24.04% 9,261 12.56% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,845 2,845 374 753 26.47% 760 ‐0.92%502110 Health/Life Insurance 8,680 8,680 977 2,443 28.15% 3,443 ‐29.04% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 225 225 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
502120 Medicare/FICA 2,675 2,675 288 579 21.64% 541 7.02%502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,260 1,260 179 360 28.57% 338 6.51%602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 61 128 12.80% 458 ‐72.05% 602120 Books/Periodicals 1,200 1,200 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 178 ‐100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,600 1,600 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 22 ‐100.00% 607115 Training 1,200 1,200 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 289 ‐100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 965 965 80 241 24.97% ‐ 100.00% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 53,940 53,940 ‐ 48,358 89.65% 43,657 10.77% 4000 Community Development Administration Total 308,915 308,915 27,713 104,415 33.80% 97,366 7.24% 4100 Planning501110 Salaries‐Regular 302,790 289,170 20,528 36,194 12.52% 56,560 ‐36.01% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 1,200 1,200 ‐ 69 5.75% 443 ‐84.42%501125 Salaries‐Appointed 9,000 9,000 831 1,938 21.53% 2,423 ‐20.02% 502100 Retirement 72,645 69,380 5,074 8,959 12.91% 12,884 ‐30.46% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 4,630 4,630 378 667 14.41% 1,120 ‐40.45% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 61,270 58,515 2,715 4,766 8.14% 6,021 ‐20.84% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ 100 250 ** ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 770 770 112 112 14.55% 6 1766.67% 502120 Medicare/FICA 4,475 4,275 306 553 12.94% 860 ‐35.70% Community Development‐Lilley
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 18 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual*
Community Development‐Lilley
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
4100 Planning, Continued
502130 Other Benefit Charges 3,510 3,350 181 319 9.52% 498 ‐35.94% 602110 Office Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ 31 ** ‐ 100.00% 602115 Postage 750 750 (43) ‐ (253) 33.73% (103) ‐145.63% 602140 Materials & Supplies 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607100 Membership/Dues 2,500 2,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 721 ‐100.00% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 8,200 8,200 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 3,050 3,050 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608100 Contractual Services 4,000 4,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608105 Professional Services 25,000 127,915 11,590 11,590 9.06% 4,763 143.33% 608135 Microfilming 5,000 5,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 1,870 1,870 156 467 24.97% 153 205.23% 4100 Planning Total 511,660 594,575 41,928 65,662 11.04% 86,349 ‐23.96% 4200 Building Regulation501110 Salaries‐Regular 260,695 260,695 6,064 12,958 4.97% 10,982 17.99% 502100 Retirement 62,630 62,630 1,304 3,008 4.80% 2,567 17.18%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 3,970 3,970 112 238 5.99% 217 9.68% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 48,910 48,910 676 1,852 3.79% 1,815 2.04% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ 22 66 ** 92 ‐28.26% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 485 485 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 104 ‐100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 3,730 3,730 88 189 5.07% 161 17.39% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,310 2,310 53 114 4.94% 97 17.53% 602110 Office Expense 500 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 11 ‐100.00% 602115 Postage 700 700 15 23 3.29% 4 475.00%
602120 Books/Periodicals 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607100 Membership/Dues 1,200 1,200 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 500 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 19 of 24 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 20 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
101 General Fund5000 Public Information Office501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 93,255 $ 89,810 $ 8,818 $ 17,636 19.64% 17,409 $ 1.30% 502100 Retirement Charges 22,025 21,190 2,180 4,360 20.58% 4,069 7.15% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,400 1,400 162 325 23.21% 345 ‐5.80% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 22,065 21,230 262 654 3.08% 2,444 ‐73.24%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ 350 875 ** ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 200 200 ‐ 116 58.00% ‐ 100.00%502120 Medicare/FICA 1,320 1,270 133 268 21.10% 252 6.35% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 860 810 78 155 19.14% 153 1.31% 602113 Social Media 2,750 2,750 658 1,149 41.78% 155 86.51%607100 Membership/Dues ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 252 ‐100.00% 5000 Public Information Office 143,875 138,660 12,641 25,538 18.42% 25,079 1.83% 5100 Community Services Administration501110 Salaries‐Regular 323,640 323,640 34,205 64,597 19.96% 62,077 4.06% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 927 ‐100.00% 502100 Retirement 78,065 78,065 9,402 17,813 22.82% 16,243 9.67% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 4,510 4,510 629 1,220 27.05% 1,247 ‐2.17% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 26,980 26,980 2,364 5,871 21.76% 5,856 0.26%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 6,000 6,000 500 1,063 17.72% 1,625 ‐34.58% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 445 445 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **502120 Medicare/FICA 4,420 4,420 485 910 20.59% 897 1.45% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,430 2,430 301 569 23.42% 547 4.02% 602100 Special Dept Expense 9,700 12,900 542 1,829 14.18% 981 86.44% 602110 Office Expense 3,185 3,185 966 977 30.68% 95 928.42% 602115 Postage 400 400 203 209 52.25% 8 2512.50%
603110 Building Maintenance 10,485 10,485 450 900 8.58% 450 100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 550 550 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 892 ‐100.00% 5100 Community Services Administration, Continued
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Actual*
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 21 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Actual*
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
% Change
From Prior
Year
607115 Training 6,150 6,150 ‐ 2,159 35.11% ‐ 100.00% 609100 Special Events 17,900 19,400 662 1,878 9.68% 1,472 27.58% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 12,945 12,945 1,079 3,236 25.00% 1,961 65.02% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 75,215 75,215 ‐ 67,432 89.65% 48,874 37.97% 5100 Community Services Administration Total 583,020 587,720 51,788 170,663 29.04% 144,152 18.39% 5200 Community Center Operations501110 Salaries‐Regular 36,385 36,385 3,016 6,254 17.19% 6,740 ‐7.21% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 115,220 115,220 4,743 12,325 10.70% 6,335 94.55% 502100 Retirement 17,560 17,560 1,099 2,234 12.72% 1,843 21.22% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,200 2,200 143 342 15.55% 259 32.05%502110 Health/Life Insurance 4,785 4,785 299 785 16.41% 954 ‐17.71%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,700 2,700 290 665 24.63% 625 6.40% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 805 805 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **502120 Medicare/FICA 2,130 2,130 117 279 13.10% 199 40.20%502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,925 1,925 29 61 3.17% 62 ‐1.61% 602100 Special Dept Expense 4,000 4,000 609 625 15.63% 967 ‐35.37% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **603110 Building Maintenance 6,695 6,695 125 554 8.27% 1,161 ‐52.28%612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 395 395 33 99 25.06% 99 0.00% 702100 Furniture‐Office 6,500 6,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **5200 Community Center Operations 202,300 202,300 10,503 24,223 11.97% 19,244 25.87% 5300 Park Operations501110 Salaries‐Regular 77,735 77,735 8,636 17,308 22.27% 16,260 6.45% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ 180 441 ** 992 ‐55.54% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 116,440 116,440 16,470 34,634 29.74% 23,178 49.43%502100 Retirement 17,635 17,635 2,135 4,279 24.26% 3,800 12.61% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,840 2,840 462 956 33.66% 781 22.41% 5300 Park Operations, Continued502110 Health/Life Insurance 9,575 9,575 827 2,074 21.66% 2,033 2.02% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 22 of 24 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Actual*
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
% Change
From Prior
Year
502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 1,200 1,200 239 389 32.42% 400 ‐2.75% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,125 1,125 51 158 14.04% 208 ‐24.04% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,720 2,720 370 765 28.13% 592 29.22% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,655 2,655 84 170 6.40% 155 9.68% 602100 Special Dept Expense 4,000 4,000 64 129 3.23% 394 ‐67.26% 602110 Office Expense 3,000 3,000 16 16 0.53% ‐ 100.00% 5300 Park Operations 238,925 238,925 29,534 61,319 25.66% 48,793 25.67% 5400 Senior Citizens Programs501110 Salaries‐Regular 18,195 18,195 1,885 3,881 21.33% 5,002 ‐22.41% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 38,645 38,645 2,495 5,070 13.12% 7,384 ‐31.34% 502100 Retirement 4,225 4,225 466 959 22.70% 1,169 ‐17.96%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 830 830 81 165 19.88% 245 ‐32.65%502110 Health/Life Insurance 2,395 2,395 185 485 20.25% 668 ‐27.40% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ 141 291 ** 300 ‐3.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 320 320 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **502120 Medicare/FICA 780 780 66 134 17.18% 184 ‐27.17% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 770 770 18 37 4.81% 48 ‐22.92% 609200 Senior Citizen Program 1,200 1,200 44 114 9.50% 281 ‐59.43% 5400 Senior Citizens Programs 67,360 67,360 5,381 11,136 16.53% 15,281 ‐27.13% 5500 Recreation Programs602115 Postage 9,510 9,510 ‐ 3,487 36.67% 3,047 14.44% 602150 Recreation Brochure Mailing 28,000 28,000 6,366 9,466 33.81% 7,521 25.86% 608150 Contractual Recreation Program 16,800 16,800 ‐ 7,650 45.54% 5,078 50.65%5500 Recreation Programs 54,310 54,310 6,366 20,603 37.94% 15,646 31.68%101 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES $ 1,289,790 $ 1,289,275 $ 116,213 $ 313,482 24.31% 268,195 $ 16.89% * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 23 of 24 ends

Acct. No.

Description
% of Budget
101 General Fund1600 Non‐Departmental800250 Transfer to FACT Grant $ 46,470 $ 46,470 $ 9,670 $ 9,670 20.81% $ 4,275 126.20% 800251 Transfer to Senior Transportation Fund 11,045 11,045 1,092 2,310 20.91% 1,451 59.20% 800280 Transfer to SCP Maintenance Fund 59,200 59,200 4,933 14,800 25.00% 10,285 43.90% 800305 Transfer to Capital Projects Fund 180,000 180,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT $ 296,715 $ 296,715 $ 15,695 $ 26,780 9.03% $ 16,011 67.26% Transfers to Other Funds‐Bannigan
September 2022 General Fund Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Actual*
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
* = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 24 of 24 ends

General Fund - Fund Balance Status
Measure GG
Transaction &
General Fund Use Tax Fund
(101) (102) Total
Reserves as of June 30, 2022 (per City Reserve Policy):

Capital Improvement (A) $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000
Economic Uncertainty (B) 5,700,000 5,700,000
Emergency Disaster Continuity (C) 2,900,000 2,900,000
Equipment and Maintenance (A) 150,000 150,000
Technology Equipment (A) 150,000 150,000
Subtotal 13,900,000 - 13,900,000
Other Fund Balance Commitments:

Developer Contributions from Public Benefit Fees 1,377,796 1,377,796 Developer Contributions from Beautification Fees 190,000 190,000 Developer Contributions from Neighborhood Preservation Fees 88,500 88,500 Subtotal 1,656,296 - 1,656,296
Available Fund Balance (unreserved) 9,928,927 389,599 10,318,526 Total Discretionary Fund Balance as of June 30, 2022 25,485,223 389,599 25,874,822 Estimated increase (decrease) of fund balance
during Fiscal Year 2022-23 75,310 75,310
Total Projected Discretionary Fund Balance as of June 30, 2023 25,560,533 $ $ 389,599 $ 25,950,132 Notes:
(A) - Flat amounts per Reserve Policy adopted on June 14, 2022 (City Resolution No. 2022-34). (B) - Amount is equal to 20% of Fiscal Year 2022/23 operating expenditures budgeted in General Fund per Reserve Policy adopted on June 14, 2022 (City Resolution No. 2022-34). (C) - Amount is equal to 10% of Fiscal Year 2022/23 operating expenditures budgeted in General Fund per Reserve Policy adopted on June 14, 2022 (City Resolution No. 2022-34).

ATTACHMENT C
Click here to return to the agenda.

Account
No. Description
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *% of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year

REVENUES
435100 Interest $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,975 $ 50,975 203.90% $ 8,025 535.20%435110 Unrealized Gains/Losses ‐ ‐ (74,202) (27,892) ** (2,758) 911.31% 436140 Tina Way/Pacific Ave. Property Rent 560,000 560,000 153,498 169,398 30.25% 4,230 3904.68% 437135 Expense Reimbursement 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** TOTAL REVENUES $ 586,000 $ 586,000 $ 130,271 $ 192,481 32.85% 9,49 $ 7 1926.76%

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES
Salaries and Benefits
501110 Salaries‐Regular 145,820 145,820 16,870 31,888 21.87% 31,289 1.91% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ ** 109 ‐100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part‐Time 2,575 2,575 234 480 18.64% 540 ‐11.11% 502100 Retirement 35,325 35,325 4,513 8,668 24.54% 8,061 7.53% 502105 Workers' Compensation 2,205 2,205 315 596 27.03% 630 ‐5.40% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 15,290 15,290 1,307 2,833 18.53% ‐ 3,008 5.82% 502111 Medical in Lieu 450 450 43 144 32.00% 180 ‐20.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 195 195 22 48 24.62% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,035 2,035 230 434 21.33% 434 0.00% 502130 Other Benefits 1,055 1,055 149 281 26.64% 276 1.81% Total‐Salaries and Benefits 204,950 204,950 23,683 45,372 22.14% 44,527 1.90% Maintenance and Operations
602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 602115 Postage 500 500 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% 14 ‐100.00% 602140 Materials and Supplies 5,000 5,000 70 410 8.20% ‐ 100.00% 603120 Minor Repairs 15,000 15,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
604105 Utilities 50,000 50,000 328 4,238 8.48% 3,699 14.57% 607100 Membership Dues 4,800 4,800 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,000 1,000 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608100 Contractual Services 24,000 24,000 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ 2,088 100.00%608105 Professional Services 530,500 530,500 20,517 14,213 2.68% 34,783 ‐59.14% HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND (#285)
September 2022 Revenues and Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23

ATTACHMENT D

Page 1 of 2 ends

Account
No. Description
FY 2022/23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2022/23
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
September
Year to Date
Actual *% of Budget
FY 2021/22
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND (#285)
September 2022 Revenues and Expenditures (25% of year)
FY 2022/23
Maintenance and Operations , Continued
610130 Tina Pacific Operating Expenses (QMG) ‐ ‐ 49,662 49,662 ** ‐ 100.00% 610131 Bad Debt Expense (QMG) ‐ ‐ 14,670 14,670 ** ‐ 100.00%610135 Relocation Assistance 40,000 40,000 2,448 8,837 22.09% 5,551 59.20% 610230 Navigation Center (North SPA) 50,000 50,000 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 611110 O.C. Sanitation User Fee 21,500 21,500 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 612135 Building Maintenance 75,000 75,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** Total‐Maintenance and Operations 820,800 820,800 87,695 92,030 11.21% 46,135 99.48% Allocated Charges
612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 5,805 5,805 484 1,451 25.00% 2,519 ‐42.40% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 7,295 7,295 ‐                 6,540 89.65%                   ‐ 13,345 50.99%612140 Information Technology Charge 18,215 18,215 1,518 4,554 25.00% 6,019 ‐24.34% 614205 Admin Overhead 21,580 21,580 3,197 6,018 27.89% 5,047 19.24% Total‐Allocated Charges 52,895 52,895 5,199 18,563 35.09% 26,930 ‐31.07% Capital Outlay
760100 Demolition/Condemnation 200,000 293,800 ‐                 ‐ ** ‐ ** 790100 Land Acquisition ‐ 2,500,000 ‐                 ‐ ** ‐ ** Total‐Capital Outlay 200,000 2,793,800 ‐                 ‐ ** ‐ ** TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,278,645 $ 3,872,445 $ 116,577 $ 155,965 4.03% 117,592 $ 32.63% REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES $ (692,645) $ (3,286,445) $ 13,694 $ 36,516 $ (108,095) * = Actual data is reported through September.

ATTACHMENT D

Page 2 of 2 ends

Housing Authority Fund (Fund 285) - Fund Balance Status Available Fund Balance as of June 30, 2022 12,414,239 $ Estimated increase (decrease) of fund balance
during Fiscal Year 2022-23 (3,283,695)
Projected Available Fund Balance as of June 30, 2023 $ 9,130,544

ATTACHMENT E
Click here to return to the agenda.

Task Code Description
Adopted
Budget
2022/23
FY 2021/22
Budget
Carryover
(Pending CM
Approval)
Other Budget
Adjustments
Amended
Budget
2022/23
YTD
Actual
2022/23 Encumbrances
% Spent
(Includes
Encumbrances)
Remaining
Budget
Street Projects
2022‐101 Citywide Street Rehabilitation (FY 2021/22) $ ‐ $        ‐ 1,846,245 $ $ 1,846,245 $ 141,856 $ 1,715,125 100.6% (10,736) $ 2022‐102 Citywide Street Sign Replacement ‐ 149,490 ‐                 149,490 ‐             ‐ 0.0% 149,490 2023‐101 Citywide Street Rehabilitation (FY 2022/23) 2,090,000 109,050 ‐                 2,199,050 9,553 99,558 5.0% 2,089,9392023‐102 Greening Stanton 180,000 ‐ ‐                 180,000 ‐             ‐ 0.0% 180,000 2023‐103
Catch Basin Connector Pipe Screen
Installations (FY 2022/23) 70,000 ‐ ‐                 70,000 ‐             ‐ 0.0% 70,000 Total Street Projects $ 2,340,000 $ 2,104,785 $ ‐ $ 4,444,785 $ 151,409 $ 1,814,683 44.2% 2,478,693 $ Parks Projects
2021‐201 Park Master Plan $ ‐ $ 174,620 $ ‐ $ 174,620 $ 11,227 $ 152,161 93.6% $ 11,232 2021‐205 Dog Park ‐ 154,555 ‐ 154,555 10,724 123,918 87.1% 19,913 2022‐201 Family Resource Center Improvements 182,600 391,140 ‐                 573,740 376 23,740 4.2% 549,624 2022‐203 Orangewood Parkette 850,000 78,885 ‐                 928,885 257 58,844 6.4% 869,784 2022‐204 Norm Ross Sports Park ‐ 7,691,060 ‐                 7,691,060 1,082 640,000 8.3% 7,049,978 2022‐205 Replace Shade Structure at Stanton Central Park ‐ 60,000 ‐                 60,000 344 ‐ 0.6% 59,656 2022‐206 Premier Park Renovation 500,000 150,000 200,000 850,000 8,067 80,843 10.5% 761,090 2022‐820 Stanton Park Adult Fitness Equipment 84,090 3,885 ‐                 87,975 1,515 2,368 4.4% 84,092 2022‐833 Stanton Park Refresh ‐ ‐ 410,000 410,000 ‐             ‐ 0.0% 410,000 Total Parks Projects $ 1,616,690 $ 8,704,145 $ 610,000 $ 10,930,835 $ 33,592 $ 1,081,874 10.2% 9,815,369 $ Sewer
2022‐301 Sewer Master Plan Update $ ‐ $ 531,225 $ ‐ $ 531,225 $ 336 $ 480,489 90.5% $ 50,400 2023‐301 Annual Sewer Rehabilitation (FY 2022/23) 550,000 ‐ ‐                 550,000 ‐             ‐ 0.0% 550,000 Total Sewer $ 550,000 $ 531,225 $ ‐ $ 1,081,225 $ 336 $ 480,489 44.5% $ 600,400 Facilities
2022‐839 ADA Transition Plan $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.0% $ 90,000 Total Facilities $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.0% $ 90,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 4,506,690 $ 11,340,155 $ 700,000 $ 16,546,845 $ 185,337 $ 3,377,046 21.5% 12,984,462 $

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2022/23

STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
JULY 1, 2022 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

ATTACHMENT F

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2022/23

STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
JULY 1, 2022 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
Funding Source
101 General Fund $ 180,000 $ ‐ 32,885 $ $ 212,885 $ 1,515 $ 2,368 1.8% 209,002 $ 211 Gas Tax Fund 27,763 276,920 ‐ 304,683 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 304,683215 RMRA Fund 1,011,998 1,109,895 ‐ 2,121,893 ‐ 245,813 11.6% 1,876,080 220 Measure M Turnback Fund 1,064,239 656,040 ‐ 1,720,279 151,409 1,568,870 100.0% ‐ 222 CDBG Grant Fund ‐ 350,000 ‐ 350,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 350,000 227 Other Grants Fund 1,107,976 7,691,060 ‐ 8,799,036 1,082 640,000 7.3% 8,157,954 257 ARPA Fund ‐ 174,620 700,000 874,620 11,227 152,161 18.7% 711,232 305 Capital Projects Fund (Reserves) 31,000 92,930 ‐ 123,930 344 ‐ 0.3% 123,586310 Park In‐Lieu Fund 533,714 424,580 ‐ 958,294 19,424 287,345 32.0% 651,525 501 Sewer Maintenance Fund 405,000 531,225 ‐ 936,225 336 480,489 51.4% 455,400 502 Sewer Capital Improvement Fund 145,000 ‐ ‐ 145,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 145,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 4,506,690 $ 11,340,155 $ 700,000 $ 16,546,845 $ 185,337 $ 3,377,046 21.5% 12,984,462 $

ATTACHMENT F

Page 2 of 2 ends

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT

OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974
REPORT IN BRIEF:

Pursuant to the Political Reform Act (“Act”), the City Council directed staff to: (1) conduct a review of the City’s Conflict of Interest Code (“Code”) to determine if a change in the Code was necessary; (2) file a biennial notice regarding the results of the review no later than the required deadline; (3) revise the Code if necessary based upon such review; and (4) submit the amended Code to the City Council for adoption and approval, in accordance with Section 87303 of the Act.

During the review process, staff found that amendments to the City’s Conflict of Interest Code are necessary. A redline version of the proposed amended Code is attached.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-44, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON

APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974”.

BACKGROUND:

The Political Reform Act of 1974, Government Code Section 81000 et seq. (“Act”), requires all public agencies to adopt and maintain a Conflict of Interest Code. The Act further requires that agencies regularly review and update their conflict of interest codes as necessary as directed by the code-reviewing body or when change is necessitated by changed circumstances (Sections 87306 and 87306.5). The City Council is the City’s code-reviewing body. As the code-reviewing body, the City Council directed that the Code Item: 9G
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 be reviewed and, if a change in the Code was necessary, that a revised Code be prepared and submitted to the City Council for adoption and approval.

During this review, staff found that amendments to the Code are necessary to include new positions required to be designated.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

Subsequent changed circumstances within the City have made it advisable and necessary pursuant to Sections 87306 and 87307 of the Act to amend and update the Code.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

This item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the accompanying resolution as to form.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Public notice for this item was publicly posted and made to each affected position as required by the Fair Political Practices Commission and made through the regular agenda process.

STRATEGIC PLAN COMPONENT ADDRESSED:

Objective 6: Maintain and promote a responsive, high quality and transparent government.

Prepared by: Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Legislative (redline) version of amended Conflict of Interest Code B. Resolution No. 2022-44 w/ Amended Conflict of Interest Code Attached 55414.00000\40796893.2

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

LEGISLATIVE VERSION
(SHOWS CHANGES MADE)
BBK – October 2020 2022

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE

CITY OF STANTON
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
55414.00000\40796893.2

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
-2- BBK – October 2020 2022

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE

CITY OF STANTON
(Amended November 12, 2020 22, 2022)
The Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 Cal. Code Regs. § 18730) that contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which can be incorporated by reference in an agency’s code. After public notice and hearing Section 18730 may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference. This incorporation page, Regulation 18730 and the attached Appendix designating positions and establishing disclosure categories, shall constitute the conflict of interest code of the City of Stanton (the "City").

The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney and the City Treasurer, shall electronically file their annual statements of economic interests directly with the Fair Political Practices Commission. All other officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall file their statements with the City Clerk as the City’s Filing Officer. The City Clerk shall retain the original statements filed by all other officials and designated positions and will make all retained statements available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours. (Gov. Code § 81008.) All officials and designated positions required to submit a statement of economic interests shall receive ethics training as required pursuant to Government Code section 53235 (AB 1234). The City’s Filing Officer shall annually provide all filers with information on training available to meet the requirements of Section 53235, and maintain required records indicating the dates that filers satisfied the training requirements and the entity that provided the training. These records shall be retained for five years after the date of training and are public records subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. (Gov. Code § 53235.2.) 55414.00000\40796893.2

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
App. A-1
BB&K – October 2020 2022

APPENDIX

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE

CITY OF STANTON
(Amended November 12, 2020 22, 2022)
PART “A”
The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the City Treasurer, and all Other City Officials who manage public investments, as defined by 2 Cal. Code of Regs. §18700.3, are NOT subject to the City’s Code but must file disclosure statements under Government Code section 87200 et seq. [Regs. § 18730(b)(3)]

OFFICIALS WHO MANAGE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
It has been determined that the positions listed below are Other City Officials who manage public investments1. These positions are listed here for informational purposes only.

Finance Director/Treasurer
Investment Consultant
1 Individuals holding one of the above-listed positions may contact the Fair Political Practices Commission for assistance or written advice regarding their filing obligations if they believe that their position has been categorized incorrectly. The Fair Political Practices Commission makes the final determination whether a position is covered by § 87200. 55414.00000\40796893.2

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
App. A-2
BB&K – October 2020 2022

DESIGNATED POSITIONS

GOVERNED BY THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’ DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES

TITLE OR FUNCTION ASSIGNED
Administrative Services Director 4, 7
Administrative Services Manager 4, 7
Administrative Services Supervisor 5, 6
Assistant City Engineer 2, 3, 5
Assistant City Manager 1, 2
Assistant Community and Economic Development Director 2, 3, 5, 6 Assistant Planner 1, 2
Assistant to the City Manager 1, 2
Associate Engineer 2, 3, 5
Associate Planner 1, 2
Building Inspector 6
Building Official 5, 6
Business License Specialist 5, 6
City Attorney (not filing under GC 87200) 1, 2
City Clerk 5
Civil Engineer 2, 3, 5
Code Enforcement Officer 2, 5
Code Enforcement/Parking Control Manager 5
55414.00000\40796893.2

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’ DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES

TITLE OR FUNCTION ASSIGNED
App. A-3
BB&K – October 2020 2022
Code Enforcement/Parking Control Supervisor 2, 5
Community & Economic Development Director 2, 3, 5, 6
Community Services Coordinator 5, 7
Community Services Director 5
Community Services Manager 5
Community Services Supervisor 5
Deputy City Manager 1, 2
Economic Development Specialist 2, 3, 5, 6
Engineering Assistant 2, 3, 5
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 2, 5
Housing Associate 2, 5, 6, 7
Housing Specialist 5, 6, 7
Human Resources Manager 5
Human Resources/ Risk Management Analyst 5
Information Technology Specialist 5
Management Analyst 5
Marketing Assistant 5
Park Ranger 5
Planning Manager 2, 3, 5, 6
Public Safety Services Director 2, 5, 6
Public Works Director/City Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
55414.00000\40796893.2

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’ DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES

TITLE OR FUNCTION ASSIGNED
App. A-4
BB&K – October 2020 2022
Public Works Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6
Public Works Manager 5
Recreation Leader 5
Redevelopment Associate 2, 3, 5, 7
Senior Planner 1, 2
Senior Public Works Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6

MEMBERS OF BOARDS,

COMMITTEES & COMMISSIONS
Parks & Recreation Commission 2, 3, 5
Stanton Community Foundation 1, 2
Successor Agency 1, 2
Consultants and New Positions2
2 Individuals serving as a consultant as defined in FPPC Reg. 18700.3 or in a new position created since this Code was last approved that make or participate in making decisions must file under the broadest disclosure set forth in this Code subject to the following limitation:

The City Manager may determine that, due to the range of duties or contractual obligations, it is more appropriate to assign a limited disclosure requirement. A clear explanation of the duties and a statement of the extent of the disclosure requirements must be in a written document. (Gov. Code §. 82019; FPPC Regs. 18219 and 18734.). The City Manager’s determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. (Gov.

Code §. 81008.)
55414.00000\40796893.2

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
App. B-1
BB&K – October 2020 2022
PART ”B”

DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
The disclosure categories listed below identify the types of economic interests that the designated position must disclose for each disclosure category to which he or she the designated is assigned.
3 “Investment” means financial interest in any business entity (including a consulting business or other independent contracting business) and are reportable if they are either located in or doing business in the jurisdiction, are planning to do business in the jurisdiction, or have done business during the previous two years in the jurisdiction of the City.

Category 1: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that are located in, do business in or own real property within the jurisdiction of the City.

Category 2: All interests in real property which is located in whole or in part within, or not more than two (2) miles outside, the boundaries of the City, including any leasehold, beneficial or ownership interest or option to acquire property.

Category 3: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that are engaged in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property within the jurisdiction of the City.

Category 4: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the City.

Category 5: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, that provide services, products, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the designated position’s department, unit or division.

Category 6: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, subject to the regulatory, permit, or licensing authority of the designated employee's department, unit or division.

Category 7: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income, including gifts, loans and travel payments, or income from a nonprofit organization, if the source is of the type to receive grants or other monies from or through the City or its subdivisions.
3 This Conflict of Interest Code does not require the reporting of gifts from outside this agency’s jurisdiction if the source does not have some connection with or bearing upon the functions or duties of the position. (Reg. 18730.1)
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-44

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-44

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON APPROVING

AND ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974
WHEREAS, the State of California enacted the Political Reform Act of 1974, Government Code Section 81000, et seq. (the "Act"), which contains provisions relating to conflicts of interest which potentially affect all officers, employees and consultants of the City of Stanton (the “City”), and which requires all public agencies to adopt and promulgate a conflict of interest code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted an amended Conflict of Interest Code (the "Code") by Resolution No. 2020-47 dated November 10, 2020; and
WHEREAS, subsequent changed circumstances within the City have made it advisable and necessary pursuant to Sections 87306 and 87307 of the Act to amend and update the Code; and
WHEREAS, the potential penalties for violation of the provisions of the Act are substantial and may include criminal and civil liability, as well as equitable relief which could result in the City being restrained or prevented from acting in cases where the provisions of the Act may have been violated; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of a public meeting on, and of consideration by the City Council of, the proposed amended Code was provided to each affected designated employee and was publicly posted for review; and WHEREAS, a public meeting was held upon the proposed amended Code at a regular meeting of the City Council on November 22, 2022, at which all present were given an opportunity to be heard on the proposed amended Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The City Council does hereby approve and adopt the amended Conflict of Interest Code, a copy of which is attached hereto and shall be on file with the City Clerk and available to the public for inspection and copying during regular business hours.

SECTION 2: That the said amended Conflict of Interest Code shall become effective immediately upon adoption and approval.

SECTION 3: This Resolution rescinds all previous Conflict of Interest Codes of the City of Stanton.

Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-44

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Stanton on this 22nd day of November, 2022.

DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
ATTEST:

I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2022-44 has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the Stanton City Council, held on November 22, 2022, and that the same was adopted, signed and approved by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
55414.00000\40796893.3

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
BBK – October 2022

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE

CITY OF STANTON
55414.00000\40796893.3

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
-2- BBK – October 2022

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE

CITY OF STANTON
(Amended November 22, 2022)
The Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 Cal. Code Regs. § 18730) that contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which can be incorporated by reference in an agency’s code. After public notice and hearing Section 18730 may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference. This incorporation page, Regulation 18730 and the attached Appendix designating positions and establishing disclosure categories, shall constitute the conflict of interest code of the City of Stanton (the "City").

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
App. A-1
BB&K – October 2022

APPENDIX

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
OF THE

CITY OF STANTON
(Amended November 22, 2022)
PART “A”
The Mayor, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the City Treasurer, and all Other City Officials who manage public investments, as defined by 2 Cal. Code of Regs. §18700.3, are NOT subject to the City’s Code but must file disclosure statements under Government Code section 87200 et seq. [Regs. § 18730(b)(3)]

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
App. A-2
BB&K – October 2022

DESIGNATED POSITIONS

GOVERNED BY THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’ DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’ DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES

TITLE OR FUNCTION ASSIGNED
App. A-3
BB&K – October 2022
Code Enforcement/Parking Control Supervisor 2, 5
Community & Economic Development Director 2, 3, 5, 6
Community Services Coordinator 5, 7
Community Services Director 5
Community Services Manager 5
Community Services Supervisor 5
Deputy City Manager 1, 2
Economic Development Specialist 2, 3, 5, 6
Engineering Assistant 2, 3, 5
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 2, 5
Housing Associate 2, 5, 6, 7
Housing Specialist 5, 6, 7
Human Resources Manager 5
Human Resources/ Risk Management Analyst 5
Information Technology Specialist 5
Management Analyst 5
Marketing Assistant 5
Park Ranger 5
Planning Manager 2, 3, 5, 6
Public Safety Services Director 2, 5, 6
55414.00000\40796893.3

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
DESIGNATED POSITIONS’ DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES

TITLE OR FUNCTION ASSIGNED
App. A-4
BB&K – October 2022
Public Works Director/City Engineer 2, 3, 5, 6
Public Works Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6
Public Works Manager 5
Recreation Leader 5
Redevelopment Associate 2, 3, 5, 7
Senior Planner 1, 2
Senior Public Works Inspector 2, 3, 5, 6

MEMBERS OF BOARDS,

Code §. 81008.)
55414.00000\40796893.3

LAW OFFICES OF

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
App. B-1
BB&K – October 2022
PART ”B”

DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
The disclosure categories listed below identify the types of economic interests that the designated position must disclose for each disclosure category to which the designated is assigned.
3 “Investment” means financial interest in any business entity (including a consulting business or other independent contracting business) and are reportable if they are either located in or doing business in the jurisdiction, are planning to do business in the jurisdiction, or have done business during the previous two years in the jurisdiction of the City.

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES WITH

KTGY FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC
PLAN
REPORT IN BRIEF:

Due to staffing changes among the consultant team, additional time is requested to complete the Town Center Specific Plan and associated studies. The original term of the contract ended June 30, 2022. Staff requests the Council authorize an extension to June 30, 2023.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Approve the Amendment to the Agreement for Consulting Services with KTGY to extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2023; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment between the City of Stanton and KTGY.

BACKGROUND:

On July 28, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with KTGY for the preparation of the Town Center Specific Plan. The term of the contract was through June 30, 2022.

Due to staffing changes among the consultant team, additional time is requested to complete the studies and the document. The Specific Plan and studies are 80% completed with the environmental document, financial feasibility study and market study underway but outstanding. Additional time is requested to finish the components for the Town Center Specific Plan.

Item: 9H
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

Extension of the term date would allow the consultant to complete the environmental document and associated studies. Staff is currently reviewing the draft Town Center Specific Plan and will work closely with the consultant to complete the remaining pieces.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No change in the contract amount is requested as part of this action. Therefore, no fiscal impact will occur as part of this action. The only change is to extend the contract date to June 30, 2023 to complete the environmental document and associated studies.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

This project not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act Section pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5), organization or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

Objective 5: Provide a High Quality of Life
Objective 6: Maintain and Promote a Responsive, High Quality and Transparent Government.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda process.

Prepared by: Maribeth Tinio, Planning Manager
Reviewed by: Jennifer Lilley, Community and Economic Development Director Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachment:

A. Amendment to Contract with KTGY

AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Submitted to: City of Stanton
Jennifer Lilley, Community &
Economic Director
Date: October 31, 2022
7800 Katella Ave. Community Name: Town Center Specific Plan Stanton, CA 90680 Project No: 20200398.00
714-890-4213
[email protected]
Re: Amendment to Agreement Term
Amendment (AMD) No.: 4
Prepared by: KTGY Group, Inc.

Geoff Graney
17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
949-851-2133
[email protected]
Client and KTGY agree as follows:

The Agreement For Consulting Services dated July 28, 2020 between Client and KTGY shall be amended by deleting the entirety of Section 1 and replacing Section 1 as follows:
“1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on July 28, 2020 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2023 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.”
All other terms and conditions of the original contract shall remain unchanged.

KTGY Group, Inc. City of Stanton
Signed:

Name: Ken Ryan
Signed:

Name:

Title: Principal Title:

Date: 10/31/2022 Date:

Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT TO DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS, LLC TO PROVIDE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELFEVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS (TASK CODE 2022-839)
REPORT IN BRIEF:

City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide professional ADA self-evaluation and transition plan development services. Disability Access Consultants, LLC is the best qualified firm to provide the professional services and staff is recommending award of contract to that firm. In addition, staff is requesting City Council approval for an appropriation of $20,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211) to increase the budget for the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan project from $90,000 to $110,000.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Award a contract to Disability Access Consultants, LLC to provide professional ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan development services for a maximum contract amount of $99,730; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and Disability Access Consultants, LLC in a contract to provide the services; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to approve a contingency in the amount of $10,000 to Disability Access Consultants, LLC; and

5. Appropriate $20,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211) to increase the ADA SelfEvaluation and Transition Plan Development project’s budget to $110,000.

Item: 9I
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 BACKGROUND:

Public right‐of‐way and facilities are required to be accessible to persons with disabilities pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). This statute prohibits public agencies from discriminating against persons with disabilities by excluding them from services, programs, or activities. The City is required to have an ADA Transition Plan to be eligible to obtain Federal grant funding.

The ADA Transition Plan will identify existing obstacles limiting accessibility, specify a schedule for achieving compliance, and provide recommendations for complying with accessibility requirements as mandated by the ADA and State of California Access Codes. It will also provide the basis for prioritizing, budgeting, implementing, and monitoring barrier removal.

City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide professional ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan development services. The RFP was released in accordance with the City’s Purchasing Policy and Procedures.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

A Request for Proposals was issued on August 1, 2022 with a proposal due date of September 12, 2022. Five (5) firms provided proposals: Ardurra Group, Inc., Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC, Disability Access Consultants, LLC (DAC), Sally Swanson Architects, Inc., and Sustainable Recreation Design. The proposals were evaluated by the Public Works Department, and City staff came to a consensus that DAC provided the best proposal.

DAC is qualified to provide professional ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan development services for City facilities, parks, and public Right-of-Way. DAC has successfully provided the same services to other cities, such as Fountain Valley, San Juan Capistrano, Carlsbad, and San Mateo. The total fee is $99,730 with an optional citywide reference map and project database as optional services for no extra fees.

FISCAL IMPACT:

On September 27, 2022, the City Council allocated $90,000 from the City’s ARPA Fund (#257) for this project. Staff is requesting City Council approval to appropriate $20,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211) to increase the budget to $110,000, to cover the proposal cost and the contingency amount.

The City is a member agency of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA), who offers an ADA Assistance Program. The Program assists member agencies in achieving compliance with ADA laws by providing technical and financial resources. City staff is working with CJPIA to secure reimbursement to supplement the City’s budget, up to a maximum amount of $24,300. Any reimbursement would be applied back to the ARPA and Gas Tax Funds depending on reimbursable activities. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

The action requested in this report is not categorized as a project, and therefore, categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Notifications were performed as prescribed by law.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

3. Provide a Quality Infrastructure
Prepared by: Han Sol Yoo, E.I.T, Associate Engineer
Reviewed by: Cesar Rangel, P.E., Public Works Director / City Engineer Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Professional Services Agreement
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 1 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

CITY OF STANTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF-EVALUATION AND

TRANSITION PLAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 20___, by and between the City of Stanton, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California 90680 (“City”) and Disability Access Consultants, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, with its principal place of business at 2862 Olive Highway, Suite D, Oroville, CA 95966 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of professional Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Development consultant services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Development consultant services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Development project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Development consultant services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from November 22, 2022 to October 25, 2024, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 2 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractors, Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision.

Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant shall complete, execute, and submit to City a Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification (IRS FormW-9) prior to commencement of any Services under this Agreement. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law.

Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant’s conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant’s submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Tim Mahoney.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 3 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates the Director of Public Works, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates Tim Mahoney, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement.

The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 4 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.10 Insurance.

3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence Work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.2.10.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement, the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the Insurance Requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.
(a) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office “occurrence” form CG 0001, with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and if written with an aggregate, the aggregate shall be double the per occurrence limit.

Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.

The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement.
(b) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering “Any Auto” (Symbol 1) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 each accident.
(c) Professional Liability: Professional Liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000. Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the work to be performed (for example, any exclusions relating to lead, asbestos, pollution, testing, underground storage tanks, laboratory analysis, soil work, etc.).

If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 5 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.
(d) Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.

3.2.10.3 Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval.
(a) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (a) Commercial General Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Additional Insured: The City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional
insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement.

Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to “ongoing operations”; (2) exclude “contractual liability”; (3) restrict coverage to “sole” liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the Agreement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(b) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (b) Automobile Liability and (d) Professional Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(c) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (e) Workers’ Compensation shall be endorsed to provide the
following:
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 6 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
(1) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the indemnified parties.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.

3.2.10.4 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All insurance coverages shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the indemnified parties shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.2.10.5 Waiver of Subrogation. Required insurance coverages shall not prohibit Consultant from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant shall waive all subrogation rights against the indemnified parties. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.2.10.6 Deductible. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the indemnified parties in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.

3.2.10.7 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates and endorsements on forms approved by the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.

3.2.10.8 Failure to Maintain Coverage. Consultant agrees to suspend and cease all operations hereunder during such period of time as the required insurance coverage is not in effect and evidence of insurance has not been furnished to the City. The City shall have the right to withhold any payment due Consultant until Consultant has fully complied with the insurance provisions of this Agreement.

In the event that the Consultant’s operations are suspended for failure to maintain required insurance coverage, the Consultant shall not be entitled to an extension of time for completion of the Services because of production lost during suspension. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 7 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.2.10.9 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to do business in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

3.2.10.10 Insurance for Subconsultants. All Subconsultants shall be included as additional insureds under the Consultant’s policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing Subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City as an Additional Insured to the Subconsultant’s policies.

3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation.

Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 8 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 9 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant:

Disability Access Consultants, LLC
2862 Olive Highway, Suite D
Oroville, CA 95966
Attn: Tim Mahoney, General Manager
City:

City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Attn: Cesar Rangel, Department of Public Works
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 10 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.5.3.3 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information (“Proprietary Information”) unless the City’s legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information.

Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant’s objection to the City’s release of Proprietary Information.

Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either:
(1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City’s choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and nonappealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.5.5 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.5.6 Indemnification.

Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.

If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

The obligation to indemnify, as provided herein, shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

3.5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.

3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.7 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.8 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.9 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 12 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

3.10 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.11 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.12 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.13 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.14 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.

For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.15 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.16 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake selfinsurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.17 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 13 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.18 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.19 Declaration of Political Contributions. Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, submit to City an annual statement in writing declaring any political contributions of money, in-kind services, or loan made to any member of the City Council within the previous twelve-month period by the Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees, including any employee(s) that Consultant intends to assign to perform the Services described in this Agreement.

3.20 Subcontracting.

3.20.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
[Signatures on following page.]
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 14 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Professional Services Agreement on this ____ day of __________, 202_.

CITY OF STANTON DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS,
LLC
By:

Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
By:__________________________________
Name: Barbara Thorpe
Title: President
By: _________________________________
Name: Tim Mahoney
Title: General Manager
ATTEST:

By:

Patricia Vazquez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
55414.00000\32996936.2
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Proposal for
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Self-evaluation and Transition Plan Development Services September 9, 2022
Disability Access Consultants, LLC
2862 Olive Highway, Suite D
Oroville, CA 95966
DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan i Table of Contents
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL .................................................................................................................................. 1

1. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROJECT APPROACH .................................................................... 3 PROJECT APPROACH: SELF-EVALUATION ........................................................................................................................... 4 PROJECT APPROACH - TRANSITION PLAN .......................................................................................................................... 6 PROJECT SCHEDULE............................................................................................................................................. 8

2. FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS ....................................................................................... 9 PRIOR PROJECTS............................................................................................................................................................ 11

3. TEAM QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE............................................................................................15 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART................................................................................................................................................ 15

4. EXCEPTIONS AND DEVIATIONS ..............................................................................................................17

5. SCHEDULE......................................................................................................................................................17

6. PROPOSAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM...............................................................................................18 EXHIBIT B................................................................................................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX - SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS ....................................................................................................19 SAMPLE DACTRAK SCREEN SHOTS AND INFORMATION.................................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX – RESUMES .......................................................................................................................... APPENDIX BARBARA THORPE, DAC PROJECT MANAGER ....................................................................................................APPENDIX MICHAEL BOGA, DAC SENIOR DIRECTOR OF ACCESSIBILITY SERVICES AND HEAD OF QUALITY CONTROL............APPENDIX DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 1

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: September 9, 2022
To: Joe Ames, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Stanton
Public Works Department
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Re: Request for Proposal Response for American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Development Services Firm Information: Disability Access Consultants, LLC (DAC) Corporate Address: 2862 Olive Highway, Suite D, Oroville, CA 95966 Project Contacts: Tim Mahoney, General Manager Barbara Thorpe, President [email protected] [email protected]
(800) 743-7067 (800) 743-7067
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our statement of qualifications and proposal for providing consultant services for an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-evaluation and Transition Plan for the City of Stanton facilities, parks, parking lots, street, intersections and sidewalks.

Disability Access Consultants, LLC (DAC) has thoroughly examined the request for proposals and has become familiar with the work and deliverables required in the RFP and is capable of performing quality work to achieve the objectives of the City. DAC has extensive experience in the evaluation of program and facility accessibility and provides a full continuum of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and accessibility services for public entities, such as the City of Stanton. DAC has an extensive and successful history of performing and delivering quality work that will and exceed the objectives of this RFP for the City.

Founded as a California company in 1998, DAC has provided services for the past 24 years to assist public entities to comply and implement accessibility requirements in accordance with the ADA, Title 24 of the California Building Code, Section 504 and related federal, state and local disability-related nondiscrimination laws and regulations.

DAC has conducted over 28,000 building inspections, surveyed thousands of parks and playgrounds, inspected over 13,000 of miles of public rights-of-way and performed hundreds of programmatic reviews and self-evaluations to study the accessibility of programs, services, activities, events and related areas.

DAC has a team of 25 staff, including CASp certified inspectors, dedicated to assisting public entities, such as the City of Stanton, with ADA compliance. DAC has a comprehensive understanding of applicable standards, regulations and requirement under Title II of the ADA, California Building Code, PROWAG, CAMUTCD, Caltrans and related state accessibility standards. All DAC team members listed in this proposal will be the core staff working with the City on this project and will be actively involved on a daily basis. DAC’s team is keenly aware of the requirement, scope and deliverable required by this RFP and has the availability and expertise to successfully complete this project.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 2 The project manager for the City of Stanton project, will be Barbara Thorpe. Prior to founding DAC 24 years ago, she worked with a public entity for 19 years as the ADA Coordinator, 504 Coordinator and Director of Planning and Compliance. Barbara has extensive experience working with individuals with disabilities and organizations representing individuals with disabilities. In addition, she has collaborated with individuals with disabilities and organizations that represent individuals with disabilities in a facilitative manner that has benefited city and town governments during her work with other municipalities.

Barbara and the DAC team members have demonstrated the ability to engage and interact with individuals and organizations to assist with the prioritization, long range planning and implementation of the ADA plan. Barbara and her team have successfully completed over 400 similar projects to the City of Stanton.

The DAC team members presented in this proposal are all assigned to this project and will serve as the key team members for the project. All will be actively involved and available to ensure a successful project. No members of the key DAC team will be removed without consent of the City.

We have provided more detail and background about Barbara and the DAC team in the organization and resume sections of this proposal.

DAC is currently assisting or has recently completed similar studies for numerous city and county governments similar to the City of Stanton. Including the City of Anaheim, City of Fullerton, City of Huntington Beach, City of Torrance, City of Moreno Valley, City of Loma Linda, Riverside Unified School District, City of Murrieta, City of Lake Elsinore, City of Rolling Hills Estates, City of Rancho Palos Verdes, City of Laguna Niguel, City of Milpitas, County of San Mateo, City of Fremont, City of Redwood City, City of Fairfield, City of Dublin, City of Livermore, City of Berkeley and the City of San Mateo.

To provide for easy management of the transition plan and documentation of compliance efforts, DAC has developed web-based, Accessibility Management Software called DACTrak. DACTrak is a powerful online tool to manage and update the transition plan, project costs and document progress.

Custom reports can be printed in a variety of formats. DACTrak provides a quality finished product for easy and cost-effective management of the ADA plan.

DAC has received and reviewed the one (1) addendum that has been published on August 30, 2022 and has incorporated the information into the preparation of our response.

The proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the submittal.

All information submitted with the proposal is true and correct.

Tim Mahoney and Barbara Thorpe have contractual responsibility and are authorized to negotiate and bind the firm contractually and both are authorized to sign this proposal and any contract documents. All information submitted in DAC’s response to the City of Stanton request for proposal is true and correct.

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide our services to the City of Stanton.

Respectfully submitted by Tim Mahoney, General Manager
DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 3

1. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND PROJECT APPROACH
It is understood that the City of Stanton is requesting a firm with professional experience in accessibility compliance to assist City staff in the self-evaluation of City facilities, public rights-ofways, programs, services, and activities, as well as the development of a transition plan.

DAC will provide services required to complete the project for the development of the City’s ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan, including the optional tasks indicated in the RFP and will provide each of the items listed Appendix A in the “Primary Scope of Services” items I.A through I.H along with the optional tasks, II.A and II. B in the RFP. The inspection of the forty-seven (47) parks, facilities and open areas along with the estimated 46.1 center line road miles are included in DAC’s response and understanding. Based on our extensive experience of working with city governments, DAC has provided suggestions for additional tasks and interactive software tools for monitoring, management, and implementation for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Title 24 of the California Building Code (CBC) and other relevant laws and regulations.

In addition, DAC understands that within the 47 facilities and parks, the City has included twentysix (26) facilities and vacant lots that are managed by the City Housing Authority. Should the fourplex units of the housing authority be currently occupied as residential units, DAC will take extra measures and planning to collaborate with the City and tenants for appropriate times and schedules for the completion of these inspection.

DAC has extensive knowledge and experience with all federal and state regulations from our 24 years in business which includes but is not limited to the current 2010 ADA Standards, 28 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 35, Title 24 California Building Standards Code, Title II of the ADA, PROWAG, MUTCD, Section 504 and related federal and state standards and regulations. The inspections will identify barriers or potential barriers in accordance with applicable federal and state accessibility standards and regulations. DAC will provide the City with proven and effective solution for prioritizing, budgeting, implementing and monitoring barrier removal.

To successfully complete the project activities in a timely manner, DAC will work closely and collaboratively with the City of Stanton without imposing unnecessary interruptions or burdens to staff. With over 28,000 facilities inspected in the past 24 years DAC has keen understanding of the challenges and planning requirements to complete effective inspections with all types of facilities.

There are potential challenges with many types of facilities, including parks, pre-school areas community centers, fire stations, police stations and emergency response facilities. Challenges can include classes being held at community centers, being held at parks, security, scheduling, and privacy concerns at emergency response centers.

As it relates to emergency response centers, we will work closely with the City to identify what areas of the facilities are actually “open to the public” that would be required to be inspected. Keep in mind, if an area is secured and/or not accessible to public, we may not necessarily need to inspect these areas such as fire station dorms, police evidence rooms and other secure, nonpublic areas.

We are very aware that due to the nature of the emergency response environment, that facilities, at certain times can be unmanned or schedules can change due to an emergency call. DAC understands these issues and works through these challenges in a method that is most beneficial and acceptable to the City. These are not difficult challenges to overcome, they just require a clear scope understanding, communication with the City, advanced and flexible planning from DAC.

DACTrak - Innovative Tools, Strategies and Best Practices Based on experience and knowledge of the accessibility field and best practices, DAC continues to develop innovative methodologies, easy to use ADA management tools, and proven, successful strategies for evaluating programs, services, activities, events, facilities, parks and public rights-of- DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 4 way. DACTrak was developed by DAC for the purpose of easy and useful importing and management of the accessibility data collected in the field. DACTrak is interactive web-based software and is not an enhanced Excel spread sheet. The ability to collect, compile, analyze and use report data in a practical format was one of the driving forces to develop the DACTrak intake and management software.

Our DAC accessibility management software, DACTrak, provides our clients with a powerful management tool to document compliance, project costs, print custom reports and record progress.

DACTrak is not an Excel spreadsheet, but actual software that has been developed by our company to assist with the implementation and documentation of the City’s ADA plan and provides photographs of as-is site conditions, which has proved to be valuable documentation. Findings and recommendations, in addition to other data are preloaded into the DACTrak software. As DAC owns and licenses the DACTrak software, we can make custom modifications for our clients.

DAC will be providing the City with the use of our DACTrak to assist the City in the management and long-term sustainability of its comprehensive ADA self-evaluation and transition plan. DACTrak is a powerful online tool that will allow the City to manage and update the transition plan, project costs and document progress.

Lastly, DAC’s overall approach to each of our clients, is that each project that we complete is unique and customized to the individual client we work with. Certainly, many of the overall objectives, standards and requirements are similar for each public entity, but the end result and long-term implementation of the plan is specific and unique to each client.

Over the past 24 years, DAC has continually developed innovative inspection techniques, deployed proven implementation strategies, consistently invested in staff training and created the DACTrak Accessibility Management Software to allow Title II entities, such as the City of Stanton, to create and effectively manage its comprehensive ADA self-evaluation and transition plan. This has allowed DAC to successfully complete over 400 ADA plans across the country with over 260 in California.

The combination of these efforts, experience and commitment to our clients has allowed DAC to bring a unique and innovative approach to this project.

Project Approach: Self-Evaluation

1. DAC will meet with designated City staff, to discuss project expectations, required forms and practices for survey methodology and a schedule for project deliverables. DAC will take this opportunity to review and clarify any questions related to the project's scope, and to become familiar with important issues and availability of resources. DAC will serve in a project management capacity throughout the project with general direction from the City’s project team.

2. DAC will develop the procedures and forms needed to conduct a self‐evaluation on behalf of the City.

3. DAC will meet with members of the City’s staff and accessibility team to describe the process, timelines, and expectations associated with both phases of work, as well as to gather any general input they may provide. DAC will also work with the City to coordinate public outreach regarding transition plan process.

4. DAC will suggest monthly or as-needed progress and update meetings with City staff to ensure City and DAC are meeting project goals and contract objectives.

5. A minimum of three meetings per the RFP, will be held and if requested, DAC will plan to attend and present the ADA transition plan to the City Council.

6. DAC will conduct selected departmental programmatic and policy reviews to determine if potential barriers to participation in City operated or sponsored services and events exist.

7. DAC will create a report of accessibility issues related to programs and policies and meet with the City’s project team to provide suggested changes to achieve compliance.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 5

8. DAC will conduct field surveys of City buildings and facilities listed the Request for Proposal. The surveys will focus on the evaluation of architectural barriers for compliance with both ADA and Title 24 of the California Building Code for both the interior and exterior of City buildings and facilities.

9. As required by the ADA, the 2010 ADA Standards will be compared with state codes and the standard that provides the greater level of accessibility utilized. As DAC collects as-is field conditions and records all information, data can be reprocessed if codes change without conducting a re-inspection, thus resulting in a significant cost savings, over time for the City

10. Due to limited City staff availability, DAC will conduct the field surveys with the intent of requesting as little assistance from City staff as possible. Surveys of facilities that require City staff assistance, such as secure facilities or those that are not generally staffed, will be coordinated through the City’s project team, and scheduled in a way that minimizes the impact to the regular workloads of the applicable staff members.

11. DAC will compile survey data in our DACTrak Accessibility Management Software, which is a user friendly and easily accessible web-based format. Reports can be generated in multiple file types, including Microsoft Excel, PDF, KML and ESRI Shapefile.

12. Survey data for public rights-of-way will also include GIS information that is compatible with ESRI ArcMap and other ArcGIS programs.

13. The survey reports provided to the City will include the following information at a minimum:
a. Sidewalks: Location description and GIS coordinates of non-compliant findings, length, width, cross slopes, material, surface condition, location of heavy cracking, uplifting, and obstacles within the sidewalk and driveway crossings.
b. Curb Ramps: Location description and GIS coordinates of non-compliant findings, type, surface condition, landing, cross slopes, width, truncated domes, and crosswalk connection and alignment.
c. Missing Curb Ramps: Location description and GIS coordinates, sidewalk surface condition, type and number of fixed obstacles.
d. Pedestrian Ramps: Location description, GIS coordinates for exterior ramps if available, length, width, landing, cross slopes, and hand railing and condition. e. Buildings: Measurements and data collected will be processed using both federal ADA and California criteria and data points, and reports will include non-compliant findings as compared to all applicable codes.

14. DAC will compile the recorded data and, following our multi-step editing and quality control process, will meet with the City’s project team to review and analyze data gathered from the survey process.

15. DAC will produce field survey reports, which will be detailed reports that identify the various noncompliant elements found. Barriers are identified by building, floor, or location and given a unique identifier record number (UIN) to assist with navigation in the accessibility software and location of the finding and recommendation by area and site. Estimated applicable costs will be given by item and element in accordance with industry standards. Costs can be easily adjusted to adhere to any cost estimates the City of Stanton may utilize. To access the reports, DAC will provide the City with a presentation of the DACTrak Accessibility Management software that allows users to generate reports in multiple formats, and to manage and track progress of the City’s updated transition plan.

16. Following the DACTrak presentation, DAC will issue logins the authorized City users. The DACTrak users will be able to review the facility survey report data and offer feedback to DAC.

DAC will record all feedback and make appropriate changes as directed by the City.

17. DAC will provide a summary of the findings of the self‐evaluation of facilities, policies, and practices; that will include, but not limited to:
• Recommendations of remedial measures to correct deficiencies and a methodology for the prioritization of barrier remediation
DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 6 • Cost estimates for remediation measures
• Implementation schedule that includes milestones or measures of achievement for monitoring implementation
• Policy and procedures for reviewing and updating the transition plan • Policy and procedure review for addressing ADA grievances • Assignment of responsibilities for remediation.

Project Approach - Transition Plan

1. DAC will provide the City with access to DACTrak Accessibility Management online software to easily allow the City to review the first draft of the ADA Transition Plan Update (Plan). The first draft will be based on prior research and data collected during the surveys. The reports will include an initial recommendation for priority of barrier removal typically associated with each type of deficiency. Using DACTrak, the City can further refine the priorities using factors such as use and available funding. DAC will work with the City and propose strategies to achieve the recommended goals.

2. DAC will consult with the City to review the draft transition plan document, identify project priorities, and solicit feedback for refining the various components. DAC will incorporate any appropriate comments, suggestions or changes made by the City’s project team into the draft plan.

3. DAC will consult with the City to review the draft transition plan document, identify project priorities, and solicit feedback for refining the various components. DAC will document all suggestions.

4. DAC can assist the City with proven tools and methods in order to complete its required public outreach efforts.

5. DAC will prepare and produce a second draft of the ADA Transition Plan that is clear, concise, and user-friendly. The report will include a detailed description of identified barriers, a method to remove or remediate the barrier, as well as initial prioritization for barrier removal and tools to allow the City to manage the barrier removal and transition plan. The ADA self-evaluation and transition plan document will describe the process that the City took to update the transition plan and include a summary of the public input received.

6. DAC will also provide DACTrak logins to authorized City users so that custom reports can be generated on demand in multiple styles and file formats.

7. The ADA self-evaluation and transition plan document will include an overview of the process, the comments received, participation of various stakeholders, recommendations for continued compliance and the end result.

8. If requested, DAC can present the final draft ADA Transition Plan at a regularly scheduled City Council meeting for discussion and concurrence by the City. It is not required nor recommended that the transition plan be approved or adopted by the City Council. Transition plans are designed to be flexible and adjusted as needed per the City’s annual budget and projects. If the transition plan is adopted, projected dates of completion that are not met may become problematic.

9. DAC will provide the City with an electronic database of items contained in the Facility Survey Report through the online DACTrak Accessibility Management Software. Reports generated in DACTrak may be exported into the City’s preferred Microsoft Excel format, as well as PDF.

Available maps will also be provided in KML and ArcGIS data format (Shapefiles).

Assessments and reports will include a high degree of detail with photographs, code references, and cost estimates. The DACTrak software and reports will include additional specifics, such as as-built dimensions, progress reports, additional prioritizations, preset reporting features and other custom reports. Reports will be delivered in the format requested, and reports will also be available using DACTrak. The inclusion of photographs showing the as-is condition has proven to be valuable assistance to clients in the formulation of the decisions regarding barrier removal priorities. The DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 7 DACTrak software provides an easy-to-use accessibility management platform that exceeds the ability to manage the plan by hard copies and binders. The assessment report of each facility will include cost estimates to correct deficiencies in accordance with the ADA and Title 24 of the California Building Code.

DAC will provide the City with actual online accessibility management software, not just an electronic database of items contained in the facility survey report. DAC has found that an electronic database does not provide the City with a tool containing integrated photographs needed to implement a barrier removal plan, set priorities, make notes and print custom reports.

DAC will provide the City with DACTrak, a web-based monitoring, tracking, and management system at project completion. DACTrak allows users to review and update progress in barrier removal, and to generate many different styles of reports to document progress. DACTrak allows users to generate electronic versions of transition plan reports in PDF, Excel, KML and ESRI Shapefile formats.

Reports may be generated site-by-site, or in multiple facility reports that gives the user the capability to choose several sites to be included in one document or one map file.

DAC will provide advisement to the City on prioritizing barrier removal to allow equal access to all City services, and also advise the City on programmatic options that would provide compliant access to services.

Quality Control and Performance
The DAC Team is organized and performs under the leadership of the DAC Project Manager with the assistance of DAC support staff. The DAC project manager coordinates activities with the DAC Director of Administrative Services to schedule project activities and provide progress reports. As the point of contact with the City, the DAC project manager provides input and direction to the DAC Team and communicates with the CASp Inspection Team Leader. The DAC accessibility specialists work directly with the DAC CASp Team Leader.

Information is collected using tablets with our DACTrak data collection software. DACTrak itself is a quality control product as it requires the user to collect the required measurements, thus providing greater consistency and reliability. If the required information is not collected for each accessibility requirement, DACTrak prompts the user and requires the information to be filed in before the user conducting the survey can continue. Using this method to compile information is one method DAC uses for quality control. An additional step is the review by the project team leader. The project team leader uses the DACTrak accessibility management system to review the data collection from each DAC inspection team on a daily basis.

Strengths of the team include experience in working together on many similar projects, knowledge of the ADA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and related codes and standards. Several of our team members provide training for city and county governments. DAC has a long standing and proven track record of on-time (frequently ahead of schedule) performance and completing contracted services under budget.

City Staff Training
DAC understands that as part of the process, the City intends for the project to provide training for City staff. As such, DAC will provide training opportunities for City staff throughout the project.

DAC will collaborate with the City to determine the designation along with the notice and posting of a City ADA Coordinator. Also, DAC would assist and support in the identification of City department ADA liaisons to serve as an on-going working group to support the City and the ADA Coordinator.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 8 As part of this objective, ADA training of City staff is one of the most productive methods to implement successful plan. DAC has provided numerous trainings to all different departments with Title II entities and Risk Management Pools (JPA’s). DAC can provide training on the topics included within the RFP:
• Applicable government code, statutes and regulations; • Performing field investigations and inspections;
• Preparation of ADA Compliance Assessment Reports;
• Monitoring and updating the ADA Self‐Evaluation and Transition Plan; • Using and maintaining the database and/or project map (see Section II); and • Internal procedures for granting exemptions for City projects.

Also, DAC can provide other types of training to City staff that may be of benefit as well. Including but not limited to:
• ADA Roles and Responsibilities
• ADA Executive Staff Training
• ADA Coordinator Training
• ADA Implementation Strategies and Methods
Optional Tasks
A. City-Wide GIS Reference Map: As DAC collects GIS coordinates when surveying public rightsof-way, the City will have the ability to generate a City-wide reference map from DACTrak for curb ramps in both KMZ and ESRI Shapefile formats. The GIS reference map will contain information and photographs regarding the ramp condition, type, slope, landing area, warning surface and other compliance information, as well as if there is a missing curb ramp that is recommended to be installed. The GIS information, along with the condition data and photographs, can be exported from DACTrak in ESRI Shapefiles compatible with ArcGIS for upload and inclusion in the City’s existing GIS and asset management system.

B. Project Database: DAC will provide the City with DACTrak, an online software program that will allow City users to monitor and update the implementation of the ADA transition plan.

The DACTrak software will correlate all components of the transition plan including but not limited to compliance and facility reports, transition plan implementation schedules, detailed descriptions and locations of the barriers and at least one photograph of each item. Map file formats for outdoor areas will also be available in both KMZ and Shapefile formats. Screen shot examples of various report styles and tools options are included throughout our proposal response. The information contained in the database will be the property of the City when the ADA Transition Plan compilation is complete. If the City chooses not to use DACTrak, the data will be provided to the City in a mutually agreed format.

Per the RFP, the City currently uses Google docs as its asset management software. DAC will work with the City to evaluate the feasibility of the City integrating DACTrak into its Google docs management applications to track implementation of the ADA transition plan. Information from DACTrak is able to be exported into many common file formats that are universaly compatible with most business software programs, including Microsoft Excel, ESRI Shapefile, KMZ and PDF.

Project Schedule
DAC understands that the City is asking for the project to be completed within twelve (12) months.

Based on experience with similar projects and scope, it is estimated that the project completion time will be within six (6) months or sooner, if City wishes this completed earlier. Please see section 5 of this response for a schedule matrix.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 9

2. FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Disability Access Consultants, LLC is a California single member, Limited Liability Company. The company does not have any financial or legal conditions that would impede DAC’s ability to provide the proposed services, to the City of Stanton. DAC has not had any other trade names for the firm in the last five years.

DAC was originally established and founded by Barbara Thorpe in 1998 and organized as its current firm type in 2011. Over the past 5 years, DAC has kept a consistent staff size between 22 to 25 full time employees at any time. All staff that hold key and essential positions as described in the organizational chart have been employees of DAC for a minimum of eleven years In addition, several other staff have been DAC team members for an excess of 10 years. Due to our in-house capabilities, DAC does not have a need to subcontract with other companies or individuals.

Founded as a woman owned California corporation in 1998, DAC has provided services for the past 24 years to assist public entities to comply and implement accessibility requirements in accordance with the ADA, Title 24 of the California Building Code, California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), Caltrans Standards and Specifications, Section 504 and related federal, state and local disability-related nondiscrimination laws and regulation. DAC has extensive experience in the evaluation of program and facility accessibility and provides a full continuum of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and accessibility services for public entities, such as the City of Stanton. DAC has conducted over 28,000 building inspections, surveyed thousands of parks and playgrounds and performed hundreds of programmatic reviews and self-evaluations to study the accessibility of programs, services, activities, events and related areas. DAC has surveyed over 13,000 miles of public rights-of-way.

As our founder, Barbara Thorpe, worked with a public entity for 19 years as the ADA Coordinator, 504 Coordinator, and Director of Planning and Compliance, she has extensive experience working with individuals with disabilities and organizations representing individuals with disabilities. In addition, she has collaborated with individuals with disabilities and organizations that represent individuals with disabilities in a facilitative manner that has benefited city and town governments during her work with other municipalities. Barbara and the DAC team members have demonstrated the ability to engage and interact with individuals and organizations to assist with the prioritization, long range planning and implementation of the ADA plan.

DAC has a team of 25 staff, with our Senior Director of Accessibility Services and Field Team Leader, Michael Boga holding CASp Certificate #152, dedicated to assisting public entities, such as the City of Stanton, with ADA compliance. DAC has a comprehensive understanding of applicable standards, regulations and requirement under Title II of the ADA, California Building Code and related state accessibility standards.

DAC has a reputation to being responsive to the client’s needs, providing on-time project completion within budgets. DAC has a proven track record for comprehensive experience in
conducting ADA self-evaluations and transition plans,
implementation and related services.

DAC has been assisting several Joint Power Authorities since 2000 and currently provides updates, consultation, plan reviews and expert witness services.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 10 DAC has worked with public entities of all sizes, from one site to 506 sites. Members of the DAC team have also served as expert witnesses to assist public entities to defend their current practices and ADA plan. DAC has only served on the side to assist public entities to defend their practices and plan and has never assisted with litigation against a public entity. Our mission statement and philosophy embrace the enhancement and assistance to our clients to build an ADA accessibility plan while documenting previous and current compliance methods.

Over the 24 years of serving our clients, DAC has demonstrated financial stability, staff stability and has a no claims insurance record.

DAC provides a full continuum of professional services that include, but are not limited to:
• Facility inspections
• Self-evaluations for ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act • Policy review and development
• Transition plans
• Public rights-of-way surveys
• Consultation
• Accessibility compliance intake and management software – DACTrak • DACTrak training to conduct your own inspections
• Expert witness services
• Plan reviews
• ADA Plan implementation assistance and consultation
• Outdoor developed and recreational areas (pools, parks, trails, camping areas) • NPSI playground safety inspections
• ADA Playground inspections
DAC utilizes the appropriate standard(s) for the inspection that may include, but is not limited to:
• ADA 2010 Standards
• California Building Code
• ADA-ABA
• UFAS
• ANSI
• Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
• Outdoor developed and recreational standards
• National Playground Safety Institute (NPSI)
standards
• PROWAG – Federal Public Rights-of-way Guidelines
• California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (CAMUTCD)
DAC has provided training and consultation to hundreds of public entities and is also the selected consultant of the Plan JPA and California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) to provide regular training sessions to their members. In addition to the JPA members, DAC has provided customized individual training regarding ADA requirements for facilities, public right-of-way, policies, special events, grievances and other related Title II topics to many of our public entity clients.

Subcontractors
DAC does not use subcontractors. All staff proposed to provide services to the City of Stanton are direct employees of DAC, there will be no outside consultants or associates employed to assist on this project. As all staff are direct employees, DAC is able organize team resources that will allow DAC to commit to providing the City with the project deliverables. As such, DAC has the in-house capability to deliver the project in a comprehensive, timely and cost-effective manner.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 11 DACTrak Overview
To provide for easy management of the transition plan and documentation of compliance efforts, DAC has developed online software called DACTrak. DACTrak is a powerful tool to manage and update the accessibility plan, project costs and document progress. Custom reports can be easily prepared, printed and saved in a variety of formats.

DAC includes the following value-added items through use of the DACTrak software:
• Noncompliant findings and recommendations are included in the DACTrak software • One or more photographs of each noncompliant finding are included • Additional photographs can be viewed of the noncompliant items • DACTrak provides a method to schedule and track the barrier removal • Documentation of progress and compliance using the progress reporting feature of DACTrak • Priorities can be established and further refined using DACTrak DACTrak provides for an organized input method that captures all the information gathered from the site inspections with photographs for each noncompliant finding. In essence, all of the field information is captured in an online software package and provides for “green” data collection and avoids paper and pencil checklists and unorganized photographs. DACTrak can also be used on a tablet pc to add new facilities and update compliance assessments and transition plans. DAC has also found that having usable “software” and not just a database is very important to be able to easily manage and update the transition plan long term.

Our extensive experience with clients needing to have an easy to manage and update plan was the catalyst for DAC to develop our DACTrak software for use by our clients. Thus, other critical issues include:
• Software to update and manage your transition plan
• Document progress and barrier removal
• Print custom reports
• Update the plan “automatically” when codes change without re-inspecting • Forecast project costs
• Add or delete facilities
DAC’s collection of actual measurements of as-is conditions and GIS information for public rights-ofway is another value-added item. The collection of an as-is condition is a valuable asset to allow the user to make an informed decision based on an actual measurement. For example, if a “yes” or “no” approach is utilized to indicate if an item is compliant, the user may not know what the actual level of noncompliance is and would not be able to set a priority or severity rating. If codes change, the information collected can be reprocessed without the need to re-inspect, thus providing longevity of the plan and internal capacity of the City in a cost-effective manner.

Prior Projects
As mentioned, DAC has an extensive and successful history of providing quality and defensible Americans with Disabilities Act self-evaluation and transition plans to over 400 clients.

Please see the map of DAC clients that are in proximity to the City of Stanton along with a list of recent references.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 12 City of San Juan Capistrano
Sam Penrod, Human Resource and Risk Manager
32400 Paseo Adelanto
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Phone: (949) 234-4565
[email protected]
Project name: ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan – Phased Approach • DAC conducted an ADA self-evaluation and transition plan for City buildings, facilities, and parks in phases
• DAC has assisted the City to successfully prepare and respond to a Caltrans audit • DAC has assisted with consultation regarding litigation and provided expert witness services • DAC has provided plan reviews, assisted the City to conduct an opportunity for public input and also conducted a self-evaluation of services, policies, programs and practices.

Start Date: August 2018 Completion Date: May 2021
Note: DAC also worked with Sam Penrod when DAC completed the City of San Clemente ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan
DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 13 City of Fountain Valley
Temo Galvez, Deputy Director
Public Works/City Engineer
10200 Slater Avenue
Fountain Valley CA 92708
Phone: (714) 593-4433
[email protected]
Project name: ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan and contract for Multi-year accessibility consulting
• DAC conducted an ADA self-evaluation and transition plan for City buildings, facilities, and parks • DAC trained City staff to collect field data for public rights-of-way using the DACTrak intake software
• DAC is assisting the City with consultation regarding accessibility and compliance • DAC assisted the City to conduct an opportunity for public input and also conducted a selfevaluation of services, policies, programs and practices.

Start Date: 2009 Completion Date: On-going consultation and plan review City of Livermore
Julie Chiu, Community Development, Engineering Division 1052 S Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550
Phone: (408) 500-5479
Project name: ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
• DAC completed an ADA self-evaluation and transition plan for City buildings, parks and 620 linear miles of public rights-of-way.
• DAC assisted the City to complete their public input process • DAC conducted the ADA self-evaluation of programs, services and activities to determine if any may be considered discriminatory for individuals with disabilities and has provide the City with an Executive Summary detailing the results and recommendations. • The City is currently using DACTrak to implement their transition plan.

Start Date: July 2020 Completion Date: Current project
City of Redwood City
Derek Wolfgram, Library Director
1017 Middlefield Road
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 780-7060
[email protected]
Project name: ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
• DAC has conducted an ADA self-evaluation and transition plan for City buildings, parks and public rights-of-way.
• DAC also assisted the City to complete their public input process and compiled the results of the responses.
• DAC conducted the ADA self-evaluation of programs, services and activities to determine if any may be considered discriminatory for individuals with disabilities and provided the City with an Executive Summary detailing the results and recommendations. • The City is currently using DACTrak to implement their transition plan.

Start Date: 2019 Completion: On-going consultation
DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 14 City of Carlsbad
Ed Garbo, Risk Manager
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: (760) 602-2471
[email protected]
Project name: ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
• DAC conducted an ADA self-evaluation and transition plan for City buildings, facilities, and parks. • DAC has also assisted the City to successfully prepare and respond to a Caltrans audit. • DAC also assisted the City to perform a self-evaluation of services, policies, programs and practices.
• DAC is providing ongoing, as needed additional consultation such as plans review. • The City is currently using DACTrak to implement their transition plan.

Project completion: 2017 Status: On-going consultation
City of San Mateo
Matthew Zucca, PE, - Deputy Director, Public Works
330 W. 20th Ave., San Mateo, CA 94403
Phone: (650) 522-7300
[email protected]
Project name: ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
• DAC conducted an ADA self-evaluation and transition plan for City buildings, facilities, and parks. • DAC also assisted the City to perform a self-evaluation of services, policies, programs and practices.
• DAC is providing ongoing, as needed additional consultation such as plans review and design standards.
• The City is currently using DACTrak to implement their transition plan.

Project completion: 2021 Status: DAC provides on-going consulting DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 15

3. TEAM QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE
DAC has a dedicated team of 25 professionals with backgrounds in administrative leadership roles with public entities, construction and code enforcement. DAC is an equal opportunity employer and our team composition includes minority and veteran representation. The DAC team for this project has a combined 100 years of experience working together on similar projects. DAC’s team has worked together on numerous ADA compliance projects with City, County and Town governments and public entities. Also, DAC currently is the contracted and preferred consultant with several large Joint Powers Associations (JPA) and insurance pools to assist public entities with ADA compliance.

The DAC team has a proven record to provide on-site services in a collaborative and efficient manner.

DAC has experienced team members who have worked with public entities for successful and on time completion of numerous projects. Necessary staff members have ICC, NPSI, and CASp certification. A CASp certified Team Leader will oversee the field evaluations and review the collected data. The project team is organized to provide a representation of skills needed to accomplish the project objectives. In addition, teams that have worked together previously will be assigned to the City of Stanton project. Key personnel resumes for this project are included in the appendices. Key staff members will be available for the duration of this project and will not be removed or replaced without prior written concurrence with the City.

Organizational Chart
Barbara Thorpe, M.Ed., LOT
DAC President and Project Manager
As DAC Project Manager, Barbara will coordinate activities and schedules and report to the City’s Project Manager or designee. Barbara will serve in the leadership role regarding the ADA selfevaluation of programs, services, activities and events along with the review of policies and procedures. Barbara brings 19 years of experience in public entity administration prior to founding DAC in 1998. With an additional 24 years of experience with DAC working with city, town and county City of Stanton
City Contacts
Srikant Talasila
Director of IT
Michael Boga
CASp-152, ICC
Senior Director of Accessibility Services
Candice Pursch, ICC
Director of Accessibility Services
Field Inspectors (4-6)
Jennie Grover
Director of
Administrative Services
Barbara Thorpe
Project Manager
Tim Mahoney
General Manager
DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 16 governments nationally, Barbara provides unparalleled understanding of the application of the Americans with Disabilities Act and related legislation for accessibility compliance. In addition to assisting public entities with compliance with the ADA, Barbara has conducted compliance reviews for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Department of the Interior to audit for compliance with the ADA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and related civil rights laws and regulations. Barbara has served as an expert witness for the Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General. Additionally, Barbara is a licensed occupational therapist. Barbara served on the Division of State Architect Advisory Board and served as the vice-chair for the DSA Access Compliance Committee. Barbara has successfully spearheaded and completed over 400 public entity self-evaluation and transition plan projects that are similar the City of Stanton project.

Michael Boga, B.A. Education, California Certified Access Specialist (CASp #152), ICC Accessibility, Usability and Plans Examiner
Senior Director of Accessibility Services and Quality Control As manager of the production and the field survey teams, Michael brings a unique blend of experience in the building industry along with his understanding of individuals with disabilities to the accessibility team. Michael is a certified accessibility specialist through the International Conference of Building Officials (ICC), certified in Accessibility, Usability and Plans examination and is a California Certified CASp inspector (# 152). Michael has completed the updated DSA courses regarding the California Building Code. Michael has provided numerous staff development sessions to public entities regarding accessibility requirements for facilities, parks and public rights-of-way. If requested, Michael would provide training, assist with plan reviews and review new construction and renovations completed for compliance. Michael has worked on over 400 projects that are similar to the City of Stanton ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan project.

Tim Mahoney, B.S.

General Manager
Tim brings twenty-eight years of executive management experience in consulting, IT, manufacturing and the construction industries. Additionally, Tim has provided program development and management for members of professional associations for twenty years. Tim has also assisted in the design and construction of hundreds of ADA, CPSC and ASTM compliant outdoor recreation areas.

As General Manager of DAC, Tim conducts quality assurance project management reviews and helps ensure contract fulfillment. Tim also provides ADA and Section 504 compliance consultation services for public entities, and staff training and development activities for public entities, businesses, and associations.

Candice Pursch, A.S. Building Inspection Technology, ICC Accessibility, Usability and Plans Examiner, Accessibility Trainer
Director of Accessibility Services
Candice’s 17 years of experience with DAC includes accessibility surveys of thousands of public facilities while employed by DAC as an accessibility specialist. Her educational background includes a degree in Building Inspection Technology from Butte College and coursework in Architectural Project Management at California State University with emphasis on construction plans and specifications, construction materials and systems, building codes, construction graphics and architectural design. Candice has completed the updated DSA courses regarding the California Building Code that include CBC Amendments, Plan Review, Accessible Public Housing Regulations, Transient Lodging, Housing and Social Service Enter Establishments. Candice also has International Code Council (ICC) Certification for Accessibility, Usability and Plans Examiner. Candice is a Certified Combination Building Inspector. Candice provides oversight of accessibility specialists and quality control.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 17 Srikant Talasila, M.S. Computer and Internet Applications Director, Information Technology
Srikant has worked in DAC’s IT Department for the past 15 years and has a total of 20 years in the field of Information Technology, holding a master’s degree in Computer Science. Srikant is very proficient in numerous software technologies, including but not limited to all modules of .Net, Java, SQL Server and Oracle. Srikant oversees DAC’s entire IT department, including infrastructure and applications, as well as managing and overseeing all stages of the development lifecycle for new software. In addition to maintaining existing software, Srikant also ensures that all necessary software updates and version enhancements are completed. Srikant also oversees the maintenance of all hardware and verifies that all reported IT related issues are resolved quickly and efficiently.

Jennie Grover, B.A. Corporate Communications
Director of Administrative Services
Jennie has worked in administration for DAC for the past 15 years. Jennie draws on her experience in technical writing to provide leadership and management of the production and technical writing team, organizing the completion of technical reports, as well as managing production schedules, staff and timelines. Jennie also organizes the process and procedure for providing opportunities for public input, as well as collecting and compiling the information received into these self-evaluation and transition plan. Jennie also provides training and help desk support for DACTrak users.

4. EXCEPTIONS AND DEVIATIONS
DAC has no objection, exception or deviation to the contract requirements as set forth in EXHIBIT C, “Sample Professional Services Agreement.”

5. SCHEDULE
DAC understands that the City is asking for the project to be completed within twelve (12) months.

Based on experience with similar projects and scope, it is estimated that the project completion time will be within six (6) months or sooner, if City wishes this completed earlier.

Task and Activities Months
1 2 3 4 5 6
DAC kickoff meeting; survey methodologies, forms,
deliverables and schedule confirmation
Project planning, survey and activity scheduling,
procedures review
Surveys of City buildings, parks, and public rights-of-way Review of policies and procedures
Draft self-evaluation of services, policies, programs and practices for City review
Public input and community outreach
Transition plan project database and accessibility reports prepared for City
DACTrak software presented to City, logins created
training on use of DACTrak
Second draft of self-evaluation deliverables presented
Deliverables completed and provided to the City
DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 18

6. PROPOSAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM

EXHIBIT B

PROPOSAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
The Proposer hereby acknowledges receipt of addenda number(s) #1 , if any.

By signing below, the Proposer agrees to all terms and conditions in this RFP, except where expressly described in the Proposer’s Services Proposal. 45-4715526
Original Signature by Authorized Officer/Agent
Timothy J Mahoney
Vendor’s Tax ID Number (FEIN)
Disability Access Consultants, LLC
Type/Print Name of Signatory
General Manager
Company Name
530-533-3000
Title
[email protected]
Phone Number
530-533-3001
Consultant Mailing Address Fax Number
www.dac-corp.com
Form of Business (mark one of the following):
☐Sole Proprietor/Individual
☐Partnership
☐Corporation
 Limited Liability Company (LLC)
Website Address
[email protected]
E-mail Address
If a corporation, the State where it is
incorporated:

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 19 Appendix - Supplemental Materials
Sample DACTrak Screen Shots and Information
In addition to information describing our DACTrak software, we are also providing additional sample screen shots generated from the DACTrak Accessibility Management web-based software program prepared for several public entity clients.

Upon logging in to
the secure DACTrak
website, you are
able to choose the
facility you would
like to view and
manage. This
screen shot is an
example of a facility
list for a recent
public entity
transition plan
project.

After choosing a
facility, you are
able to use
Reports drop
down menu to
choose which
report style to
view. You may
also choose to
view multiple
facilities in one
report.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 20 Multi Facility Excel Report Options
Excel reports may also be generated to contain findings for more than one facility by using the Multi Facility Report option in DACTrak. This report is able to be customized using the drop down menus for Categories and Priority. If the user requires a small file size for storage or emailing, the option is available to exclude photos in the generated report.

Map Overlay Report
Aerial map reports of non-compliant findings can be viewed using the Map Overlay option in DACTrak. This report plots the locations of the findings on a user friendly interactive map. Unique icons are used to symbolize the different types of findings.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 21 Drilled Down View of Map Overlay Report
Each icon in the map overlay report is a clickable link that will expand to a pop up window identifying the finding. The individual finding information may also be printed from this feature.

Summary and Chart Reports
DACTrak also includes options for summary and chart reports to be created for individual or multiple facilities. The example below is a column chart that summarizes the number of noncompliant records by category for a facility.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan 22 Global Progress Editor
Many records are able to be managed and updated with identical information from one screen using the Global Progress Editor. Users choose the records to update and the information that they would like to apply to all chosen records. Once information is entered, the user needs only to click the “Submit” button once to update all chosen records.

Priority Manager
Priority Manger allows users to manage many records on one page, but individually update each record with unique information. Once all selections are made, the user clicks “Submit” to apply all updates.

DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan Appendix Appendix – Resumes
BARBARA THORPE, DAC Project Manager
Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504 and Related Experience ▪ President of Disability Access Consultants, LLC, a woman founded small business with an extensive history of accessibility compliance consulting since 1998 ▪ Conducted hundreds of Americans with Disabilities Act Self-evaluations for public entities, City and County governments, school districts, colleges, universities and outdoor developed areas
▪ Provided consultation regarding access to programs, services and activities to public entities and businesses
▪ Conducts quality control audits of projects for compliance with the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act including public rights-of-way, facilities and outdoor developed areas ▪ Assisted with the development of thousands of transition/barrier removal plans for public entities regarding facilities and public rights-of-way
▪ Performed compliance audits for the Department of the Interior ▪ Served as an expert witness for the Department of Justice, public entities and other businesses
▪ Served on advisory boards for disability issues for public entities ▪ Provided consultation to numerous state and local government entities and the federal government regarding ADA and Section 504 compliance
▪ Assisted with ADA implementation plans and consent decrees for public entities ▪ Provided staff development activities for public entities, businesses and associations Professional Experience
▪ Occupational Therapist
▪ Teacher for special needs and persons with disabilities ▪ Program Staffing Specialist
▪ Administrator for Special Services
▪ Director of Special Education and Student Services
▪ Director of Planning and Compliance
▪ ADA Coordinator, 504 Coordinator and Equity Officer
▪ Accessibility Consultant
Education
Colorado State University, Bachelors of Science - Occupational Therapy University of South Florida, Master’s Degree – Administration and Supervision, Educational Leadership
Presentations and Training Sessions
• Indiana Parks and Recreation Association – Annual Conference • Public Entity Risk Management Authority
• City of San Clemente
• Minnesota School Board Association
• California School Board Association
• Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada • Public Agencies Risk Managers Association
• School and College Legal Services
• Council of Public Entity Attorneys
• California Defense Counsel
• McNeese State University, Louisiana
• Louisiana Association of Physical Plant Administrators DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan Appendix • California Council of School Attorneys
• San Diego County Office of Education JPA
• Tuolumne JPA
• San Mateo County Risk Management Group
• North Bay School Insurance Authority
• California Association for School Housing
• California Association of School Business Officials
• Joint Powers Authorities
• California School Board Association
• School Insurance Authority
• California Risk Management Authority
• Alameda County Facility Planners
• Rental Housing Association
• Western Fairs Association
• Contra Costa County Office of Education
• California Joint Power Insurance Authority
• South Orange County Community College District
Publications
• ADA Changes: Get a Head Start on Pending Accessibility Guidelines: September 2001- Maintenance Solutions Magazine
• A Gameplan for Access: Strategies and Tactics to help managers develop a successful barrier removal plan for public facilities: March 2003 – Maintenance Solutions Magazine • Accessible Toilet Rooms: June 2006 –American Schools & Health Facilities Publication Boards
• Served on the California Division of the State Architect State Advisory Board • Served as the vice chairperson for the California Division of the State Architect Access Compliance Advisory Committee
• Served on the California Division of State Architect Education and Training Committee Other Activities
• Currently appointed by the Office of the Independent Monitor regarding Chandra Smith vs.

Los Angeles Unified School District Modified Consent Decree • Currently appointed as a neutral monitor regarding implementation of a consent decree for a public entity
• Currently assisting with the resolution of an ADA complaints for several City and County Governments
• Currently assisting a public entity to resolve a complaint by the US Department of Justice DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan Appendix MICHAEL BOGA, DAC Senior Director of Accessibility Services and Head of Quality Control
Americans with Disabilities Act and Related Experience
• Inspected over two thousand facilities for compliance with federal and state accessibility standards
• Assisted with the development and implementation of transition/barrier removal plans • Provided consultation regarding Title II and Title III accessibility requirements • Performed compliance audits for federal agencies
• Provided accessibility training activities for public entities and businesses • Served as an expert witness for Title II and Title III • Provided numerous training sessions and seminars regarding the requirements of state and federal accessibility standards for Title II and Title III Professional Experience
• Contractor
• Work Training Program Coordinator
• Special Education Teacher
• Accessibility Inspector (1998 to Present)
Certifications and Training
• Certified Accessibility Specialist (Certificate No. CASp-152) • Certified International Council (ICC)
Accessibility/Usability/Plans Examiner (No. 1108082-21) • Certified National Playground Safety Inspector (NPSI Certificate No. 19394-0215) • Division of State Architect Academy-Accessibility/Plan Review/Fair Housing • Division of the State Architect Academy – 2010 CBC Amendments – Accessibility • Division of the State Architect Academy – 2013 CBC Amendments – Accessibility • Division of the State Architect Academy – Plan Review – Access (2013 CBC) • Division of the State Architect Academy – Accessible Public Housing Regulations • Division of the State Architect Academy – Transient Lodging, Housing at a Place of Education and Social Service Center Establishments
• Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation Compliance Division - Texas Accessibility Academy
• Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation Compliance Division – Elimination of Architectural Barriers in the Public Right-of-way
Education
St. Leo College, Bachelor of Science –Education
Publications
Articles for Maintenance Solutions Magazine
“Opportunities for Access”, March 2004
“Clearing a Path for Access”, February 2005
Presentations and Training
Educational Entities and Organizations
• Alliance of Schools for Cooperative Insurance Programs • Schools Insurance Group
• Schools Insurance Authority
• Tri County Schools Insurance Group
• California School Board Association
• San Diego County Office of Education JPA
• California Council of School Attorneys
DAC Proposal to the City of Stanton for an ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan Appendix • Indiana Parks and Recreation Annual Conference
• Tuolumne County Joint Powers Authority
• California Association of School Housing
• California Association of School Business Officials
• School and College Legal Services
Public Entities and Organizations
• Public Risk Managers Association
• Council of Public Entity Attorneys
• California Building Authority
• California Joint Powers insurance Authority
Private and Professional Organizations
• Southern California AIA
• Oroville Chamber of Commerce
• Rental Housing Authority
• Western Fairs Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada • California Defense Counsel
• Independent Living of Northern California
Other Activities
• Currently appointed by the Office of the Independent Monitor regarding Chandra Smith vs.

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
55414.00000\32996936.2
C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR SPLASH PAD

MAINTENANCE
REPORT IN BRIEF:

As the current contract is set to expire on November 30, 2022, City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide professional splash pad maintenance services at Stanton Central Park and Harry M. Dotson Park. California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters is qualified to provide the professional services and staff is recommending award of contract to that firm.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

3. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters in a contract to provide the services; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to approve a contingency in the amount of $5,000 to California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters.

BACKGROUND:

In anticipation of the expiration of the service agreement, City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide professional splash pad maintenance services and optional repair services. The RFP was released in accordance with the City’s Purchasing Policy and Procedures.

Item: 9J
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

A Request for Proposals was issued on September 26, 2022 with a proposal due date of October 20, 2022. One firm provided a proposal: California Waters. City staff came to a consensus that California Waters is qualified to continue to provide splash pad maintenance services and that sufficient funding has been allocated within the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Adopted Operating Budget.

Therefore, City staff recommends entering into a one (1) year service agreement with two (2) optional one-year extensions with California Waters in an amount not to exceed $14,940 per year, excluding CPI adjustments as provided for in the draft standard agreement, for the routine maintenance of the splash pads.

Any repair work and/or wearable item replacements are to be contracted separately from the routine maintenance contract as they cannot be fully anticipated. City staff is requesting a repair work and wearable item allowance contingency be provided in the amount of $5,000 per year. Any repair work and/or wearable item replacement will be as needed and determined by City staff, with contingencies to be approved by the City Manager.

The Agreement allows the service rates and hourly repair fees in years 2 and 3 to be adjusted each year in accordance with the March Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange Counties up to a maximum percentage of five percent (5%).

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total cost to the City will be dependent on the specific tasks needed during the life of the agreement. The Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget includes $20,000 for splash pad maintenance as follows:
280-3400-608100: $10,000
101-3400-608100: $10,000
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

This action requested in this report is not categorized as a project, and therefore, categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.
3 STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:
3 – Provide a high-quality infrastructure.

Prepared by: Han Sol Yoo, E.I.T, Associate Engineer
Reviewed by: Cesar Rangel, P.E., Public Works Director / City Engineer Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Professional Services Agreement
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 1 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

CITY OF STANTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR

SPLASH PAD MAINTENANCE

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 20___, by and between the City of Stanton, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California 90680 (“City”) and California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters, a Corporation, with its principal place of business at 23311 E. La Palma Avenue, Yorba Linda, CA 92887 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of professional Splash Pad Maintenance consultant services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional Splash Pad Maintenance consultant services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the Splash Pad Maintenance project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Splash Pad Maintenance consultant services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from December 1, 2022 to November 30, 2023, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City Manager shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement annually for no more than two additional one-year terms. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 2 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractors, Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant’s conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant’s submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Jeffrey Barman

3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates Public Works Director, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 3 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates Jeffrey Barman, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations , Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees,agents and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.10 Insurance.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 4 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.

If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.
(d) Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 5 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.

Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to “ongoing operations”; (2) exclude “contractual liability”; (3) restrict coverage to “sole” liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the Agreement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(b) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (b) Automobile Liability and (d) Professional Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(c) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (e) Workers’ Compensation shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the indemnified parties.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 6 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.

3.2.10.10 Insurance for Subconsultants. All Subconsultants shall be included as additional insureds under the Consultant’s policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing Subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 7 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City as an Additional Insured to the Subconsultant’s policies.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed FOURTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS ($14,940.00) (“Total Compensation”) without written approval of City’s Public Works Director, or his or her designee. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3.1.2, the rates set forth above may be adjusted each year at the time of renewal described in Exhibit “B” in accordance with the March Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange Counties up to a maximum percentage of five percent (5%).

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant.

The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 8 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 9 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

Consultant:

California Waters Development, Inc. DBA California Waters 23311 E. La Palma Avenue
Yorba Linda, CA 92887
Attn: Jeffrey Barman, Vice President
City:

City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Attn: Cesar Rangel, Public Works Director
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.

3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 10 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant’s objection to the City’s release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City’s choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non-appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.5.6 Indemnification.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 11 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

The obligation to indemnify, as provided herein, shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.

3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.7 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

3.10 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 12 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.12 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.16 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.18 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.19 Declaration of Political Contributions. Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, submit to City an annual statement in writing declaring any political contributions 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 13 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
of money, in-kind services, or loan made to any member of the City Council within the previous twelve-month period by the Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees, including any employee(s) that Consultant intends to assign to perform the Services described in this Agreement.

3.20 Subcontracting.

CITY OF STANTON CALIFORNIA WATERS DEVELOPMENT,
INC. DBA CALIFORNIA WATERS
By:

Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
By:

Mark Pitman
President
ATTEST:

By:

Patricia Vazquez
City Clerk
By:

Jeffrey Barman
Vice President / Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CORPORATE SEAL OF CONTRACTOR

REQUIRED
By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
55414.00000\32996936.2
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

55414.00000\32996936.2
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
55414.00000\32996936.2
C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT TO BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP

TO PROVIDE A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
REPORT IN BRIEF:

City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide a professional Pavement Management Plan. Bucknam Infrastructure Group is the best qualified firm to provide the professional services and staff is recommending award of contract to the firm. In addition, staff is requesting City Council approval for an appropriation of $26,196.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Award a contract to Bucknam Infrastructure Group to provide a professional Pavement Management Plan for a maximum contract amount of $23,796; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and Bucknam Infrastructure Group in a contract to provide the services; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to approve a contingency in the amount of $2,400 to Bucknam Infrastructure Group; and

5. Appropriate $26,196 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211).

BACKGROUND:

The City currently maintains 46.14 centerline miles of paved surfaces, composed of 32.01 centerline miles of local streets and 14.13 centerline miles of collector and arterial streets.

The funding for maintenance of these streets comes from Gas Tax, SB 1, Measure M, competitive grants, and the City’s General fund.

Item: 9K
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 A Pavement Management Plan (PMP) is a tool used to inventory, rate, track, budget, and plan for future maintenance and projects. It also tracks the performance of previous rehabilitation activities and uses that information to predict and recommend future activities.

Every street is inventoried, and its condition cataloged within the system. The recommendations are used to maximize efficiency of spending. The PMP was created in June 2007 and has been updated every two years since then.

One of the requirements of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to remain eligible for Measure M funding is that each City have a PMP and update it every two years. The City is required to update the plan and submit the update by June 2023 to continue to receive Measure M funding. The City will be using MicroPAVER to coordinate with all of the cities within the County.

City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide a professional PMP. The RFP was released in accordance with the City’s Purchasing Policy and Procedures.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

A RFP was issued on September 30, 2022 with a proposal due date of November 1, 2022. Two (2) firms provided proposals: Nichols Consulting Engineers and Bucknam Infrastructure Group. The proposals were evaluated by the Public Works Department, and staff came to a consensus that Bucknam Infrastructure Group provided the best proposal.

Bucknam Infrastructure Group is qualified to provide a professional PMP. Bucknam Infrastructure Group has successfully provided the same services to other cities, such as Fountain Valley, Cypress, and Westminster. The total lump sum fee is $23,796.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This project is not included in the City’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adopted Operating Budget.

Therefore, staff is requesting City Council appropriate $26,196 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211), which has an available fund balance of approximately $1.7 million.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

The action requested in this report is not categorized as a project, and therefore, categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.
3 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Notifications were performed as prescribed by law.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

3. Provide a Quality Infrastructure
Prepared by: Cesar Rangel, P.E., Public Works Director / City Engineer Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Professional Services Agreement
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 1 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

CITY OF STANTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 20___, by and between the City of Stanton, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California 90680 (“City”) and Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., a Corporation, with its principal place of business at 3548 Seagate Way, Suite 230, Oceanside, CA 92056 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of professional Pavement Management Plan consultant services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional Pavement Management Plan consultant services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for a Pavement Management Plan project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Pavement Management Plan consultant services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from November 22, 2022 to December 31, 2023, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City Manager shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement annually for no more than two additional one-year terms. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 2 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractors, Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Peter Bucknam.

3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates Public Works Director, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 3 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates Peter Bucknam, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations , Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees,agents and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.10 Insurance.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 4 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.

If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.
(d) Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 5 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.

Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to “ongoing operations”; (2) exclude “contractual liability”; (3) restrict coverage to “sole” liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the Agreement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(b) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (b) Automobile Liability and (d) Professional Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(c) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (e) Workers’ Compensation shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the indemnified parties.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 6 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.

3.2.10.10 Insurance for Subconsultants. All Subconsultants shall be included as additional insureds under the Consultant’s policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing Subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 7 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City as an Additional Insured to the Subconsultant’s policies.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 8 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
“maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

Bucknam Infrastructure Group
3548 Seagate Way, Suite 230
Oceanside, CA 92056
Attn: Peter Bucknam, President
City:

3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 10 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.5.6 Indemnification.

3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.

3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.7 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.10 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.12 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 12 -
55414.00000\32996936.2

3.16 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.18 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.20 Subcontracting.

3.20.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 13 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
[Signatures on following page.]
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 14 -
55414.00000\32996936.2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Professional Services Agreement on this ____ day of __________, 202_.

CITY OF STANTON BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP,
INC.

By:

Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
By:__________________________________
Name: Peter Bucknam
Title: President
By: _________________________________
Name:

Title:

ATTEST:

By:

Patricia Vazquez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CORPORATE SEAL OF CONSULTANT

REQUIRED
By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
55414.00000\32996936.2
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

55414.00000\32996936.2
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES

55414.00000\32996936.2
C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR VIRTUAL PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361
REPORT IN BRIEF:

Consideration of the circumstances of the state of emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic to determine whether remote teleconference meetings of the City Council, Committees, and Commissions can continue to be held under the provisions of AB 361.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency; and

3. Find that state or local officials have continued to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and

BACKGROUND:

On October 26, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution 2021-34, which authorized City staff to conduct remote teleconference meetings of the City Council, Committees, and Commissions under the provisions of AB 361 (in effect as of October 1, 2021 – Government Code Section 54953(e)). Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3), the City Council is required every thirty (30) days to reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency and determine whether:

Item: 9L
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 • The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person, or
• State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.

If neither of the two finding options can be made by majority vote, the City Council, Committees, and Commissions will no longer be able to continue holding public meetings by teleconference without compliance to the Ralph M. Brown Act’s Section 54953(b)(3).

Section 54953(b)(3) imposes notice and access requirements for public meetings conducted via teleconference. Such requirements include identifying in the meeting notice and agenda the teleconference location of each member of the legislative body participating in the meeting and ensuring that each teleconference location be accessible to the public.

It is important to note that having virtual meetings under the provisions of Government Code Section 54953(e)(3) is optional. If the Council wishes, it may continue to meet inperson. In addition, hybrid meetings are permissible. Given that the dynamics of the pandemic and the health crisis are continually changing, the intent of the attached Resolution is to, among other things, allow for the City’s Council, Commissions, and Committees to meet virtually in the event of illness, quarantine, or other government measures. If the Council will meet only or partially in-person, it should ensure compliance with the Orange County Health Care Agency’s recommendations for local public meetings.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

Currently, the State of California and the County of Orange remain under the state of emergency brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly with the spread of the Omicron BA.5 Variant. State and local officials are still recommending measures to promote social distancing. and the wearing of face masks.

COVID-19 Cases by City
3 COVID-19 United States Cases by County (by Johns Hopkins University) Tracking COVID-19 in California
4 FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None. This item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly).

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE(S) ADDRESSED:

1. Provide a safe community.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Public notice for this item was made through the regular agenda process.

Prepared by: Jason Huynh, Management Analyst
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: November 22, 2022
SUBJECT: URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 20.400.330 OF THE

STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING

UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND

DETERMINING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
REPORT IN BRIEF:

In September 2022, the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law, a new bill (“SB 897”) that further amends Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22—the state statutes regulating accessory dwelling units (“ADUs”) and junior accessory dwelling units (“JADUs”), respectively. SB 897 goes into effect on January 1, 2023. If the City’s ADU ordinance does not comply with state law, then its entire ADU ordinance becomes null and void as a matter of law. The attached urgency ordinance updates the City’s ADU ordinance to comply with SB 897.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council conduct a public hearing; and

THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS TO

ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH STATE REGULATIONS AND FINDING
THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA”; and

3. Find that Urgency Ordinance No. 1123 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; and

4. Adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 1123 to take immediate effect.

Item: 10A
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 BACKGROUND:

In recent years, the California Legislature has approved, and the Governor has signed into law, numerous bills that impose limits on local authority to regulate ADUs and JADUs. These bills include: (1) Assembly Bills 68 and 881 and Senate Bill 13, which went into effect on January 1, 2020; (2) Assembly Bill 3182, which went into effect on January 1, 2021; and (3) Assembly Bill 345, which went into effect on January 1, 2022.

The City Council previously adopted Ordinance Nos. 1097, 1108, and 1114 to comply with legislation.

In September 2022, the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law, a new bill (“SB 897”) that further amends Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22. Among other things, SB 897:
• Requires the City to allow certain ADUs to be higher—up to 18 or 25 feet, depending on the situation;
• Requires the City’s existing front yard setback requirement to yield for certain ADUs;
• Requires the City to justify a denial with a full set of detailed comments describing the deficiencies in the application and explaining how to remedy them; • Removes the automatic repeal in 2025 (now the ADU statute is permanent); • Prohibits the City from denying an application to create an ADU solely because corrections are needed to address nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures elsewhere on the lot that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the ADU;
• In instances where a JADU will share a bathroom with the primary dwelling, the City must require the JADU to have an interior entry to the primary dwelling’s “main living area,” independent of the exterior entrances of the JADU and primary dwelling.

SB 897 takes effect on January 1, 2023.1 If the City’s ADU ordinance does not comply with state law, then its entire ADU ordinance becomes null and void as a matter of law—and the City will have to allow ADUs with no local regulation except for the few requirements in the state ADU law itself. To avoid this scenario, the proposed ordinance (Attachment 1) updates the City’s ADU ordinance (contained in Stanton Municipal Code Section 20.400.330) to comply with SB 897. Included as Attachment 2 is a redline, which shows the changes to Section 20.400.330 effectuated by the ordinance. 1 Both AB 2221 and SB 897 were signed into law, but AB 2221 has no effect because it would have amended the same statute that SB 897 amended, and SB 897 was signed into law (chaptered) later. AB 2221 was therefore “chaptered out.” But section 2.5 of SB 897 expressly includes, among others, changes to the ADU law that would have been made by AB 2221. Ultimately, only SB 897 is effective and relevant.
3 As previously noted, failure to comply with SB 897 will render the City’s ADU ordinance null and void, thereby limiting the City to the application of the few default state standards provided in Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22. The approval of ADUs and JADUs based solely on these default statutory standards, without local regulations governing height, setback, landscape, and architectural review, among other things, would threaten the character of existing neighborhoods, and negatively impact property values, personal privacy, and fire safety.

Given the foregoing, the proposed ordinance is an urgency measure—which means it will take immediate effect upon adoption. In general, ordinances affecting planning and zoning must first be presented to Planning Commission for a recommendation and then approved following a second reading at a regular meeting of the City Council.

Ordinances generally take effect 30 days following adoption. It will be necessary for the Council to adopt this ordinance as an urgency measure because SB 897 takes effect on January 1, 2023. Staff will concurrently process a non-urgency ordinance that will be considered by the Planning Commission before returning to the City Council for adoption.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

Under California Public Resources Code section 21080.17, the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county implementing the provisions of section 65852.2 of the Government Code, which is California’s ADU law and which also regulates JADUs, as defined by section 65852.22.

Therefore, the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA in that the proposed ordinance implements the State’s ADU law.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Notice for the City Council public hearing to consider the proposed urgency ordinance was provided through the regular agenda process.

STRATEGIC PLAN:
1 – Provide a Safe Community
Prepared by: Jennifer Lilley, Community and Economic Development Director Reviewed by: HongDao Nguyen, City Attorney
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Urgency Ordinance No. 1123
B. Redline – Section 20.400.330
ORDINANCE NO. 1123

Page 1 of 18 ends

Stanton City CouncilNovember 22, 2022

Stanton City Council
November 22, 2022