NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 13 0 11 1 19 2 21 0 22 1297 2 10 6 1041 29 1 2475 APPROACH %'s : 52.00% 0.00% 44.00% 4.00% 45.24% 4.76% 50.00% 0.00% 1.65% 97.45% 0.15% 0.75% 0.56% 96.66% 2.69% 0.09% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 7 0 8 0 6 1 11 0 12 662 0 6 3 540 17 1 1274 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.583 0.000 0.333 0.000 0.750 0.250 0.550 0.000 0.600 0.849 0.000 0.500 0.375 0.918 0.708 0.250 22-010012-006
2/1/2022
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
0.858 0.417 0.563 0.837 0.917
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0.853
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.482 0.477 0.946 0.779
AM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
Ashdale St Ashdale St Cerritos Ave Cerritos Ave
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Dale Ave & Cerritos Ave
City: Stanton Project ID:
Control: Signalized Date:
NS/EW Streets:
1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 8 39 9 0 9 58 16 0 7 51 6 0 8 73 9 0 293
7:15 AM 10 45 8 0 24 65 21 0 11 55 20 0 11 77 24 0 371
7:30 AM 11 52 8 0 41 74 30 0 36 87 14 0 21 92 39 0 505
7:45 AM 13 59 14 0 56 82 60 0 32 102 16 0 16 117 40 0 607 8:00 AM 13 52 11 0 16 70 66 0 14 114 18 0 20 125 16 0 535 8:15 AM 15 46 10 0 18 71 22 0 7 85 18 0 10 86 8 0 396
8:30 AM 7 43 5 0 12 56 20 0 8 90 24 0 12 93 14 0 384
8:45 AM 11 51 6 0 7 52 11 0 4 73 15 0 8 54 5 0 297
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 88 387 71 0 183 528 246 0 119 657 131 0 106 717 155 0 3388 APPROACH %'s : 16.12% 70.88% 13.00% 0.00% 19.12% 55.17% 25.71% 0.00% 13.12% 72.44% 14.44% 0.00% 10.84% 73.31% 15.85% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 52 209 43 0 131 297 178 0 89 388 66 0 67 420 103 0 2043 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.867 0.886 0.768 0.000 0.585 0.905 0.674 0.000 0.618 0.851 0.917 0.000 0.798 0.840 0.644 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 21 80 13 0 12 68 18 0 18 115 22 0 13 88 8 0 476 4:15 PM 20 111 12 0 22 71 27 0 24 104 21 0 7 83 11 0 513 4:30 PM 18 106 17 0 17 70 22 0 30 113 22 0 10 81 18 0 524 4:45 PM 14 93 10 0 18 71 17 0 19 121 24 0 13 99 16 0 515 5:00 PM 23 101 17 0 24 87 24 0 20 132 18 0 10 84 16 0 556 5:15 PM 23 93 22 0 18 71 20 0 26 107 19 0 12 95 24 0 530 5:30 PM 21 79 18 0 21 108 24 0 23 113 21 0 12 101 10 0 551 5:45 PM 24 88 20 0 14 99 11 0 16 119 13 0 9 91 11 0 515
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 164 751 129 0 146 645 163 0 176 924 160 0 86 722 114 0 4180 APPROACH %'s : 15.71% 71.93% 12.36% 0.00% 15.30% 67.61% 17.09% 0.00% 13.97% 73.33% 12.70% 0.00% 9.33% 78.31% 12.36% 0.00% PEAK HR : 05:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 91 361 77 0 77 365 79 0 85 471 71 0 43 371 61 0 2152 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.948 0.894 0.875 0.000 0.802 0.845 0.823 0.000 0.817 0.892 0.845 0.000 0.896 0.918 0.635 0.000 22-010012-007
2/1/2022
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
0.968 0.938 0.851 0.922 0.906
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0.841
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.884 0.765 0.905 0.853
AM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
Dale Ave Dale Ave Cerritos Ave Cerritos Ave
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Rose St & Cerritos Ave
City: Stanton Project ID:
Control: 1-Way Stop(NB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 2 0 0 90 0 1 175
7:15 AM 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 1 0 1 98 0 0 211
7:30 AM 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 3 0 2 135 0 0 281
7:45 AM 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 3 0 1 145 0 0 305
8:00 AM 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 2 0 1 127 0 0 279
8:15 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 2 0 1 122 0 1 257
8:30 AM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 3 0 0 94 0 0 235
8:45 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 4 0 1 93 0 0 188
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 40 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 947 20 0 7 904 0 2 1931 APPROACH %'s : 78.43% 0.00% 21.57% 0.00% 0.00% 97.93% 2.07% 0.00% 0.77% 99.01% 0.00% 0.22% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 24 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 548 10 0 5 529 0 1 1122 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.667 0.000 0.417 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.938 0.833 0.000 0.625 0.912 0.000 0.250 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 6 0 0 141 0 2 331
4:15 PM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 1 0 2 155 0 1 299
4:30 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 2 0 3 135 0 2 312
4:45 PM 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 2 0 3 130 0 0 304
5:00 PM 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 6 0 1 140 0 0 328
5:15 PM 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 3 0 1 137 0 0 313
5:30 PM 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 3 0 3 139 0 1 336
5:45 PM 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 3 0 0 136 0 0 275
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 37 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 1278 26 0 13 1113 0 6 2498 APPROACH %'s : 59.68% 0.00% 40.32% 0.00% 0.00% 98.01% 1.99% 0.00% 1.15% 98.32% 0.00% 0.53% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 23 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 672 14 0 8 546 0 1 1281 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.639 0.000 0.708 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.918 0.583 0.000 0.667 0.975 0.000 0.250 Data - Totals
Rose St Rose St Cerritos Ave Cerritos Ave
0.725 0.936 0.916
AM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
22-010012-009
2/1/2022
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
0.953 0.769 0.922 0.970
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0.920
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave
City: Stanton Project ID:
Control: 1-Way Stop(NB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 1 103 0 0 175
7:15 AM 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 1 0 1 117 0 0 209
7:30 AM 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 1 139 0 0 264
7:45 AM 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 2 0 4 179 0 0 345
8:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 3 140 0 1 255
8:15 AM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 2 110 0 2 235
8:30 AM 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 1 0 2 138 0 1 262
8:45 AM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 1 0 1 93 0 0 170
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 18 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 828 5 0 15 1019 0 4 1915 APPROACH %'s : 40.91% 0.00% 59.09% 0.00% 0.00% 99.40% 0.60% 0.00% 1.45% 98.17% 0.00% 0.39% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 6 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 495 2 0 10 568 0 3 1099 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.750 0.000 0.469 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.798 0.250 0.000 0.625 0.793 0.000 0.375 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 5 136 0 0 299
4:15 PM 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 2 1 4 127 0 0 310
4:30 PM 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 1 0 1 141 0 0 295
4:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 1 0 1 138 0 0 317
5:00 PM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 2 0 3 127 0 0 309
5:15 PM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 4 1 3 140 0 2 303
5:30 PM 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 3 0 6 135 0 1 316
5:45 PM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 1 0 6 136 0 0 295
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 22 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 1268 14 2 29 1080 0 3 2444 APPROACH %'s : 45.83% 0.00% 54.17% 0.00% 0.00% 98.75% 1.09% 0.16% 2.61% 97.12% 0.00% 0.27% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 8 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 656 10 1 13 540 0 3 1245 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.000 0.583 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.937 0.625 0.250 0.542 0.964 0.000 0.375 Data - Totals
Court Ave Court Ave Cerritos Ave Cerritos Ave
0.525 0.791 0.794
AM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
22-010012-010
2/1/2022
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
0.982 0.550 0.947 0.959
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0.796
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave
City: Stanton Project ID:
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 2 0 1 0 1 0 19 0 3 64 2 1 4 74 3 0 174
7:15 AM 2 0 3 0 6 0 18 0 7 76 6 0 3 101 10 0 232
7:30 AM 4 0 8 0 9 0 17 0 13 109 4 0 8 120 10 0 302
7:45 AM 0 0 7 0 3 1 19 0 25 139 6 0 5 158 23 0 386
8:00 AM 2 1 8 0 6 1 20 0 13 110 2 2 7 156 32 0 360
8:15 AM 0 1 2 0 8 0 16 0 10 113 3 1 5 101 6 0 266
8:30 AM 2 1 1 0 6 1 23 0 4 108 2 2 1 127 9 0 287
8:45 AM 4 0 3 0 10 0 18 0 5 89 2 3 3 79 3 0 219
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 16 3 33 0 49 3 150 0 80 808 27 9 36 916 96 0 2226 APPROACH %'s : 30.77% 5.77% 63.46% 0.00% 24.26% 1.49% 74.26% 0.00% 8.66% 87.45% 2.92% 0.97% 3.44% 87.40% 9.16% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 6 2 25 0 26 2 72 0 61 471 15 3 25 535 71 0 1314 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.375 0.500 0.781 0.000 0.722 0.500 0.900 0.000 0.610 0.847 0.625 0.375 0.781 0.847 0.555 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 6 0 11 0 7 0 19 1 19 137 1 0 3 113 9 0 326
4:15 PM 6 0 5 0 3 0 15 0 13 144 1 2 1 118 5 0 313
4:30 PM 18 1 22 0 0 2 12 0 13 121 4 2 4 117 6 0 322
4:45 PM 8 0 11 0 4 0 21 0 17 156 4 5 4 119 9 0 358
5:00 PM 6 2 11 0 6 0 13 0 15 166 2 2 2 105 10 0 340
5:15 PM 3 1 7 0 3 0 23 0 17 144 4 2 8 134 10 0 356
5:30 PM 2 0 4 0 6 1 18 0 16 139 1 2 6 129 12 0 336
5:45 PM 3 0 6 0 8 1 18 0 12 144 1 3 4 130 13 0 343
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 52 4 77 0 37 4 139 1 122 1151 18 18 32 965 74 0 2694 APPROACH %'s : 39.10% 3.01% 57.89% 0.00% 20.44% 2.21% 76.80% 0.55% 9.32% 87.93% 1.38% 1.38% 2.99% 90.10% 6.91% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 19 3 33 0 19 1 75 0 65 605 11 11 20 487 41 0 1390 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.594 0.375 0.750 0.000 0.792 0.250 0.815 0.000 0.956 0.911 0.688 0.550 0.625 0.909 0.854 0.000 Data - Totals
Fern Ave Fern Ave Cerritos Ave Cerritos Ave
0.688 0.926 0.809 0.809
AM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
22-010012-011
2/1/2022
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
0.971 0.724 0.913 0.935 0.901
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0.851
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Court Ave & Katella Ave
City: Stanton Project ID:
Control: 1-Way Stop(SB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 127 0 0 0 138 0 0 269
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 159 0 1 0 233 0 0 398
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 278 0 0 0 244 0 0 523
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 256 0 0 0 258 1 0 518
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 215 0 0 0 210 0 0 428
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 180 0 0 0 217 0 0 398
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 0 0 0 195 0 0 389
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 0 177 0 0 330
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 10 0 5 0 4 1560 0 1 0 1672 1 0 3253 APPROACH %'s : 66.67% 0.00% 33.33% 0.00% 0.26% 99.68% 0.00% 0.06% 0.00% 99.94% 0.06% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 1 929 0 0 0 929 1 0 1867
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.750 0.000 0.250 0.835 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.900 0.250 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 264 0 1 0 240 0 0 507
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 246 0 1 0 195 0 0 448
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 312 0 0 0 253 0 0 567
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 284 0 0 0 252 1 0 538
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 1 279 0 1 0 234 0 0 522
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 265 0 0 0 262 0 0 529
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 226 0 0 0 221 0 0 449
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 233 0 0 0 193 0 0 429
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 10 0 12 0 4 2109 0 3 0 1850 1 0 3989 APPROACH %'s : 45.45% 0.00% 54.55% 0.00% 0.19% 99.67% 0.00% 0.14% 0.00% 99.95% 0.05% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 1 1140 0 1 0 1001 1 0 2156 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.350 0.000 0.625 0.000 0.250 0.913 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.955 0.250 0.000 Data - Totals
Court Ave Court Ave Katella Ave Katella Ave
0.583 0.836 0.898
AM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
22-010012-012
2/1/2022
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
0.951 0.429 0.915 0.956
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
0.892
File Name: DaleAve_StandustrialSt
Site Code: 00000000
Start Date: 2/8/2022
Page No: 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 7:00 AM 0 83 6 0 0 0 5 56 0 3 0 7 160
7:15 AM 0 99 1 0 0 0 5 66 0 2 0 0 173
7:30 AM 0 110 4 0 0 0 6 73 0 0 0 1 194
7:45 AM 0 107 7 0 0 0 4 101 0 2 0 2 223
Total 0 399 18 0 0 0 20 296 0 7 0 10 750
8:00 AM 0 130 3 0 0 0 4 81 0 2 0 2 222
8:15 AM 0 109 4 0 0 0 3 66 0 2 0 2 186
8:30 AM 0 106 4 0 0 0 4 73 0 4 0 4 195
8:45 AM 0 94 4 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 5 175
Total 0 439 15 0 0 0 11 292 0 8 0 13 778
4:00 PM 0 103 2 0 0 0 2 121 0 2 0 7 237
4:15 PM 0 115 4 0 0 0 2 128 0 6 0 5 260
4:30 PM 0 151 2 0 0 0 2 131 0 5 0 4 295
4:45 PM 0 105 2 0 0 0 2 135 0 1 0 8 253
Total 0 474 10 0 0 0 8 515 0 14 0 24 1045
5:00 PM 0 106 2 0 0 0 2 131 0 3 0 0 244
5:15 PM 0 136 0 0 0 0 2 104 0 5 0 4 251
5:30 PM 0 123 0 0 0 0 1 117 0 0 0 1 242
5:45 PM 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 2 0 1 200
Total 0 462 2 0 0 0 5 452 0 10 0 6 937
Grand Total 0 1774 45 0 0 0 44 1555 0 39 0 53 3510
Apprch % 0 97.5 2.5 0 0 0 2.8 97.2 0 42.4 0 57.6
Total % 0 50.5 1.3 0 0 0 1.3 44.3 0 1.1 0 1.5
File Name: DaleAve_StandustrialSt
Site Code: 00000000
Start Date: 2/8/2022
Page No: 2
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
7:45 AM 0 107 7 114 0 0 0 0 4 101 0 105 2 0 2 4 223
8:00 AM 0 130 3 133 0 0 0 0 4 81 0 85 2 0 2 4 222
8:15 AM 0 109 4 113 0 0 0 0 3 66 0 69 2 0 2 4 186
8:30 AM 0 106 4 110 0 0 0 0 4 73 0 77 4 0 4 8 195
Total
Volume 0 452 18 470 0 0 0 0 15 321 0 336 10 0 10 20 826 % App.
Total 0 96.2 3.8 0 0 0 4.5 95.5 0 50 0 50
PHF 0 0.869 0.643 0.883 0 0 0 0 0.938 0.795 0 0.8 0.625 0 0.625 0.625 0.926 File Name: DaleAve_StandustrialSt
Site Code: 00000000
Start Date: 2/8/2022
Page No: 3
Dale Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Dale Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Standustrial Street
Eastbound
Dale Avenue
Northbound
Dale Avenue
Northbound
Standustrial Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
4:15 PM 0 115 4 119 0 0 0 0 2 128 0 130 6 0 5 11 260
4:30 PM 0 151 2 153 0 0 0 0 2 131 0 133 5 0 4 9 295
4:45 PM 0 105 2 107 0 0 0 0 2 135 0 137 1 0 8 9 253
5:00 PM 0 106 2 108 0 0 0 0 2 131 0 133 3 0 0 3 244
Total
Volume 0 477 10 487 0 0 0 0 8 525 0 533 15 0 17 32 1052 % App.
Total 0 97.9 2.1 0 0 0 1.5 98.5 0 46.9 0 53.1
PHF 0 0.79 0.625 0.796 0 0 0 0 1 0.972 0 0.973 0.625 0 0.531 0.727 0.892 Dale Avenue
Northbound
Dale Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Standustrial Street
Eastbound
April 2022 Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study Appendix B – ICU Spreadsheets, HCM Reports, Synchro and SimTraffic Reports – Existing Conditions
Intersection #1
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 124 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T
EB Thru 317 1 1.47 0.13
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 113 0.53 0.13
Comb. L-T-R
WB Left 152 1 1.00 0.10
Comb. L-T
WB Thru 312 1 1.53 0.13
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 95 0.47 0.13
Comb. L-T-R
NB Left 61 1 1.00 0.04
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1323 3 3.78 0.22
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 77 0.22 0.22
Comb. L-T-R
SB Left 91 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 2064 3 3.77 0.34
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 128 0.23 0.34
Comb. L-T-R
0.23 0.38
0.61 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
Cerritos Ave
Beach Blvd
AM Existing
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
B
Total:
0.66 0.05
Intersection #1
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 163 1 1.00 0.10
Comb. L-T
EB Thru 414 1 1.55 0.17
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 119 0 0.45 0.17
Comb. L-T-R
WB Left 127 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T
WB Thru 290 1 1.48 0.12
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 102 0 0.52 0.12
Comb. L-T-R
NB Left 119 1 1.00 0.07
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1954 3 3.75 0.33
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 133 0.25 0.33
Comb. L-T-R
SB Left 111 1 1.00 0.07
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 1645 3 3.70 0.28
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 131 0.30 0.28
Comb. L-T-R
0.25 0.40
0.64 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
Cerritos Ave
Beach Blvd
PM Existing
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 B
0.69 Intersection #5
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 144 2 2.00 0.05
Comb. L-T
EB Thru 480 3 3.00 0.10
Comb. T-R 0
EB Right 133 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T-R
WB Left 229 2 2.00 0.08
Comb. L-T
WB Thru 582 3 3.00 0.12
Comb. T-R 0
WB Right 129 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T-R
NB Left 272 2 2.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1230 3 3.28 0.23
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 268 0.72 0.23
Comb. L-T-R
SB Left 186 2 2.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 1921 3 3.62 0.33
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 201 0.38 0.33
Comb. L-T-R
0.18 0.43
0.61 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service B
0.66 0.05
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
Katella Ave
Beach Blvd
AM Existing
Intersection #5
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 262 2 2.00 0.09
Comb. L-T
EB Thru 688 3 3.00 0.14
Comb. T-R 0
EB Right 210 1 1.00 0.13
Comb. L-T-R
WB Left 246 2 2.00 0.09
Comb. L-T
WB Thru 562 3 3.00 0.12
Comb. T-R 0
WB Right 165 1 1.00 0.10
Comb. L-T-R
NB Left 307 2 2.00 0.11
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1703 3 3.55 0.30
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 217 0.45 0.30
Comb. L-T-R
SB Left 169 2 2.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 1575 3 3.66 0.27
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 148 0.34 0.27
Comb. L-T-R
0.23 0.38
0.60 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
Katella Ave
Beach Blvd
PM Existing
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 B
0.65 Intersection #10
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 89 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T
EB Thru 388 1 1.71 0.14
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 66 0 0.29 0.14
Comb. L-T-R
WB Left 67 1 1.00 0.04
Comb. L-T
WB Thru 420 1 1.61 0.16
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 103 0 0.39 0.16
Comb. L-T-R
NB Left 52 1 1.00 0.03
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 209 1 1.66 0.08
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 43 0.34 0.08
Comb. L-T-R
SB Left 131 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 297 1 1.25 0.15
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 178 0.75 0.15
Comb. L-T-R
0.22 0.18
0.40 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service A
0.45 0.05
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
Cerritos Ave
Dale Ave
AM Existing
Intersection #10
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 88 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T
EB Thru 473 1 1.70 0.17
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 82 0 0.30 0.17
Comb. L-T-R
WB Left 47 1 1.00 0.03
Comb. L-T
WB Thru 379 1 1.70 0.14
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 66 0 0.30 0.14
Comb. L-T-R
NB Left 81 1 1.00 0.05
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 366 1 1.69 0.14
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 67 0.31 0.14
Comb. L-T-R
SB Left 81 1 1.00 0.05
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 337 1 1.60 0.13
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 85 0.40 0.13
Comb. L-T-R
0.20 0.19
0.39 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
Cerritos Ave
Dale Ave
PM Existing
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 A
0.44 SimTraffic Simulation Summary
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report QS Page 1
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25
End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 9054 9092 9092 9120 9071 9133 9222
Vehs Exited 9041 9054 9077 9081 9041 9106 9168
Starting Vehs 85 93 85 92 92 99 78
Ending Vehs 98 131 100 131 122 126 132
Travel Distance (mi) 2480 2490 2483 2490 2478 2481 2520 Travel Time (hr) 112.2 105.2 107.0 118.6 113.7 118.4 115.2 Total Delay (hr) 27.7 20.5 22.3 33.9 29.3 33.9 29.3
Total Stops 508 486 498 493 444 507 509
Fuel Used (gal) 81.1 79.5 79.7 82.5 81.1 82.4 82.9
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25
End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 9100 9073 9040 9099
Vehs Exited 9075 9004 8979 9062
Starting Vehs 96 92 86 86
Ending Vehs 121 161 147 123
Travel Distance (mi) 2470 2463 2450 2481
Travel Time (hr) 118.7 122.5 120.2 115.2
Total Delay (hr) 34.4 38.4 36.7 30.7
Total Stops 466 560 587 504
Fuel Used (gal) 82.5 83.1 82.3 81.7
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 7:25
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report QS Page 2
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 8:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 9054 9092 9092 9120 9071 9133 9222
Vehs Exited 9041 9054 9077 9081 9041 9106 9168
Starting Vehs 85 93 85 92 92 99 78
Ending Vehs 98 131 100 131 122 126 132
Travel Distance (mi) 2480 2490 2483 2490 2478 2481 2520 Travel Time (hr) 112.2 105.2 107.0 118.6 113.7 118.4 115.2 Total Delay (hr) 27.7 20.5 22.3 33.9 29.3 33.9 29.3
Total Stops 508 486 498 493 444 507 509
Fuel Used (gal) 81.1 79.5 79.7 82.5 81.1 82.4 82.9
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 8:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 9100 9073 9040 9099
Vehs Exited 9075 9004 8979 9062
Starting Vehs 96 92 86 86
Ending Vehs 121 161 147 123
Travel Distance (mi) 2470 2463 2450 2481
Travel Time (hr) 118.7 122.5 120.2 115.2
Total Delay (hr) 34.4 38.4 36.7 30.7
Total Stops 466 560 587 504
Fuel Used (gal) 82.5 83.1 82.3 81.7
SimTraffic Performance Report
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report QS Page 3
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 23.2 0.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.7 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.5 3.4 3.0 0.4 1.2 1.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 863.7 849.2 557.0 1818.4 90.6 424.4 291.0 1.0 0.2 32.3 25.8 0.3 Stop Delay (hr) 0.2 0.5 3.4 3.0 0.4 1.2 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 861.8 847.6 555.9 1815.3 87.0 423.7 288.9 0.2 0.0 32.2 24.1 0.0 Total Stops 1 1 20 5 22 9 15 23 0 4 18 1
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.50 0.91 0.83 1.47 0.90 0.94 0.02 0.00 1.00 0.95 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.4 1.3 1.0 1.7 165.8 3.0 0.2 1.1 132.7 Travel Time (hr) 0.2 0.5 3.6 3.0 0.4 1.2 1.4 6.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 4.7 Vehicles Entered 1 2 21 5 15 9 15 1433 26 4 19 2286
Vehicles Exited 0 0 14 2 12 8 13 1431 26 4 19 2286
Hourly Exit Rate 0 0 14 2 12 8 13 1431 26 4 19 2286
Input Volume 1 1 23 7 14 10 16 1450 26 4 17 2311
% of Volume 0 0 61 29 86 80 81 99 100 100 112 99
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 10.7
Total Del/Veh (s) 0.1 10.0
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 10.2
Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.0 9.5
Total Stops 0 119
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.03
Travel Dist (mi) 0.5 309.0
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 21.4
Vehicles Entered 9 3845
Vehicles Exited 9 3824
Hourly Exit Rate 9 3824
Input Volume 9 3889
% of Volume 100 98
SimTraffic Performance Report
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report QS Page 4
3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.2 1.7 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 53.5 870.3 543.1 0.5 0.1 91.7 27.3 0.6 0.1 3.8 Stop Delay (hr) 0.1 0.2 1.7 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 Stop Del/Veh (s) 53.3 867.5 541.0 0.0 0.0 91.3 25.3 0.0 0.0 3.2 Total Stops 0 14 7 10 0 0 2 4 0 0 37
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.01 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 0.8 0.5 0.7 204.9 3.1 0.3 0.6 267.1 0.8 478.7 Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.2 1.7 1.4 7.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 9.4 0.0 20.2 Vehicles Entered 0 14 6 9 1476 22 2 5 2296 7 3837
Vehicles Exited 0 14 4 7 1474 22 2 5 2298 7 3833
Hourly Exit Rate 0 14 4 7 1474 22 2 5 2298 7 3833
Input Volume 1 15 6 9 1489 23 3 5 2336 8 3895
% of Volume 0 93 67 78 99 96 67 100 98 88 98
4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.8 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 402.0 453.8 0.1 0.1 2.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 Total Delay (hr) 2.8 5.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 9.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 1654.8 1196.9 475.7 102.9 125.1 0.2 19.6 1.0 0.3 8.8 Stop Delay (hr) 2.8 5.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 8.7 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1654.7 1197.9 474.3 103.5 123.7 0.0 16.9 0.0 0.0 8.1 Total Stops 4 10 2 5 3 0 10 0 0 34
Stop/Veh 0.67 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.01 Travel Dist (mi) 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 61.3 1.8 304.8 2.5 371.6 Travel Time (hr) 3.5 8.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 2.2 0.1 10.9 0.1 26.2 Vehicles Entered 5 15 2 5 3 1473 13 2278 19 3813
Vehicles Exited 2 8 2 5 3 1474 13 2278 19 3804
Hourly Exit Rate 2 8 2 5 3 1474 13 2278 19 3804
Input Volume 8 24 2 4 3 1482 15 2315 21 3874
% of Volume 25 33 100 125 100 99 87 98 90 98
SimTraffic Performance Report
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report QS Page 5
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr) 4.5
Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.1
Total Delay (hr) 24.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 844.1
Stop Delay (hr) 22.2
Stop Del/Veh (s) 777.4
Total Stops 190
Stop/Veh 1.84
Travel Dist (mi) 1159.4
Travel Time (hr) 67.8
Vehicles Entered 3913
Vehicles Exited 27
Hourly Exit Rate 27
Input Volume 11658
% of Volume 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report QS Page 6
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LT R UL T T T UL T T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 260 166 95 149 154 98 63 55 7 5 4
Average Queue (ft) 101 77 22 63 27 13 5 16 0 0 0
95th Queue (ft) 268 188 84 157 157 121 69 44 5 3 3
Link Distance (ft) 341 488 546 546 546 296 296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 55 125 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 75 15 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 52 0
Intersection: 3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St
Movement EB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR R T UL
Maximum Queue (ft) 50 178 69 2 29
Average Queue (ft) 17 74 3 0 6
95th Queue (ft) 60 185 32 2 23
Link Distance (ft) 293 484 646
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 45 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0
Intersection: 4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave
Movement EB WB NB NB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR UL T T UL
Maximum Queue (ft) 256 30 20 7 2 37
Average Queue (ft) 181 9 2 0 0 8
95th Queue (ft) 320 42 10 3 2 30
Link Distance (ft) 249 243 206 206
Upstream Blk Time (%) 54
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 160
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 65
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10051 10068 10063 10022 10044 10085 9993
Vehs Exited 10027 10044 10020 9987 9984 10016 9946
Starting Vehs 99 109 107 101 109 80 97
Ending Vehs 123 133 150 136 169 149 144
Travel Distance (mi) 2733 2718 2733 2705 2719 2717 2707 Travel Time (hr) 126.1 109.1 136.9 121.9 152.8 126.6 129.9 Total Delay (hr) 33.0 16.3 43.7 29.5 60.1 33.9 37.5
Total Stops 603 631 664 643 747 667 660
Fuel Used (gal) 90.6 86.1 93.1 89.0 96.2 90.2 90.8
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 9942 10010 10029 10030
Vehs Exited 9876 9962 9978 9988
Starting Vehs 102 110 121 97
Ending Vehs 168 158 172 148
Travel Distance (mi) 2697 2705 2701 2714
Travel Time (hr) 126.5 133.4 143.8 130.7
Total Delay (hr) 34.4 40.9 51.6 38.1
Total Stops 704 722 615 664
Fuel Used (gal) 89.7 92.1 93.5 91.1
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 4:25
End Time 4:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10051 10068 10063 10022 10044 10085 9993
Vehs Exited 10027 10044 10020 9987 9984 10016 9946
Starting Vehs 99 109 107 101 109 80 97
Ending Vehs 123 133 150 136 169 149 144
Travel Distance (mi) 2733 2718 2733 2705 2719 2717 2707 Travel Time (hr) 126.1 109.1 136.9 121.9 152.8 126.6 129.9 Total Delay (hr) 33.0 16.3 43.7 29.5 60.1 33.9 37.5
Total Stops 603 631 664 643 747 667 660
Fuel Used (gal) 90.6 86.1 93.1 89.0 96.2 90.2 90.8
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 9942 10010 10029 10030
Vehs Exited 9876 9962 9978 9988
Starting Vehs 102 110 121 97
Ending Vehs 168 158 172 148
Travel Distance (mi) 2697 2705 2701 2714
Travel Time (hr) 126.5 133.4 143.8 130.7
Total Delay (hr) 34.4 40.9 51.6 38.1
Total Stops 704 722 615 664
Fuel Used (gal) 89.7 92.1 93.5 91.1
SimTraffic Performance Report
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 41.7 41.5 49.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 2.0 0.1 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 3.0 4.0 3.9 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 1441.5 451.8 2035.2 396.3 149.4 108.7 1.0 0.2 217.1 105.3 0.3 0.1 Stop Delay (hr) 0.4 3.0 4.0 3.8 0.9 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1440.2 450.8 2031.5 393.0 148.4 106.4 0.1 0.0 217.1 103.8 0.0 0.0 Total Stops 0 24 6 41 22 37 19 0 6 12 2 0
Stop/Veh 0.00 1.00 0.86 1.17 0.96 0.95 0.01 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 1.4 0.5 2.6 2.6 4.4 252.0 4.7 0.3 0.7 106.8 1.3 Travel Time (hr) 0.4 3.4 4.1 4.5 1.1 1.3 9.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 3.8 0.1 Vehicles Entered 1 24 6 35 23 38 2169 40 6 12 1843 23
Vehicles Exited 0 20 0 23 22 38 2170 40 5 11 1842 23
Hourly Exit Rate 0 20 0 23 22 38 2170 40 5 11 1842 23
Input Volume 1 26 7 38 21 40 2164 41 7 12 1848 27
% of Volume 0 77 0 61 105 95 100 98 71 92 100 85
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr) 1.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.9
Total Delay (hr) 14.9
Total Del/Veh (s) 12.6
Stop Delay (hr) 14.0
Stop Del/Veh (s) 11.9
Total Stops 169
Stop/Veh 0.04
Travel Dist (mi) 377.4
Travel Time (hr) 28.7
Vehicles Entered 4220
Vehicles Exited 4194
Hourly Exit Rate 4194
Input Volume 4232
% of Volume 99
SimTraffic Performance Report
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report
3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 4.6 71.2 60.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 1.3 2.5 4.1 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.3 0.0 10.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 945.9 205.6 1791.6 1063.9 0.8 0.3 366.3 191.1 0.6 0.1 8.8 Stop Delay (hr) 0.5 1.3 2.5 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 9.5 Stop Del/Veh (s) 944.0 205.0 1788.2 1061.2 0.0 0.0 366.0 189.2 0.0 0.0 8.1 Total Stops 2 22 5 16 0 0 9 4 1 0 59
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.14 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 Travel Dist (mi) 0.1 1.1 0.3 1.1 308.8 1.8 1.0 0.5 216.0 0.8 531.6 Travel Time (hr) 0.5 1.3 2.6 4.4 10.9 0.1 1.0 0.2 7.6 0.0 28.7 Vehicles Entered 2 22 5 14 2252 13 9 4 1865 7 4193
Vehicles Exited 0 19 1 8 2253 13 9 4 1867 7 4181
Hourly Exit Rate 0 19 1 8 2253 13 9 4 1867 7 4181
Input Volume 2 23 6 15 2241 12 8 5 1881 8 4201
% of Volume 0 83 17 53 101 108 112 80 99 88 100
4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 0.2 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 Denied Del/Veh (s) 172.1 239.7 0.1 1.7 1.8 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 4.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 7.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 1569.7 854.7 35.5 117.6 70.8 0.3 0.1 113.5 69.5 0.9 0.3 6.3 Stop Delay (hr) 1.3 4.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 6.6 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1568.5 854.2 36.0 118.2 69.6 0.0 0.0 112.7 67.1 0.0 0.0 5.8 Total Stops 3 15 23 7 17 6 0 8 10 0 0 89
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.02 Travel Dist (mi) 0.1 0.7 1.1 0.3 0.8 89.0 0.4 1.1 1.4 243.8 4.1 342.8 Travel Time (hr) 1.5 5.7 0.3 0.2 0.4 3.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 8.7 0.2 20.8 Vehicles Entered 3 17 23 7 18 2150 10 8 11 1834 32 4113 Vehicles Exited 1 10 23 7 18 2150 10 8 10 1833 31 4101
Hourly Exit Rate 1 10 23 7 18 2150 10 8 10 1833 31 4101 Input Volume 3 25 23 8 19 2137 9 9 9 1859 32 4133
% of Volume 33 40 100 88 95 101 111 89 111 99 97 99
SimTraffic Performance Report
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr) 3.3
Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.8
Total Delay (hr) 32.4
Total Del/Veh (s) 904.3
Stop Delay (hr) 30.2
Stop Del/Veh (s) 841.5
Total Stops 317
Stop/Veh 2.46
Travel Dist (mi) 1251.8
Travel Time (hr) 78.2
Vehicles Entered 4328
Vehicles Exited 34
Hourly Exit Rate 34
Input Volume 12566
% of Volume 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
City of Stanton, CA 04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LT R UL T T T UL T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 182 406 103 170 217 55 45 76 45 2 2
Average Queue (ft) 89 174 29 74 26 6 4 25 3 0 0
95th Queue (ft) 271 446 92 157 151 85 72 69 38 2 1
Link Distance (ft) 341 488 546 546 546 296 296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 55 125 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 75 7 11 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 28 0 61 0 1 0
Intersection: 3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St
Movement EB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR R TR UL T
Maximum Queue (ft) 164 279 52 3 87 56
Average Queue (ft) 54 153 2 0 29 3
95th Queue (ft) 172 362 29 3 87 41
Link Distance (ft) 293 484 646 546
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 69 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 0 4 0
Intersection: 4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave
Movement EB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR UL T T T TR UL T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 239 58 60 74 15 10 8 76 2 7 7
Average Queue (ft) 127 12 17 5 1 0 0 20 0 0 0
95th Queue (ft) 285 38 51 42 8 6 5 59 2 6 4
Link Distance (ft) 249 243 206 206 206 206 646 646 646
Upstream Blk Time (%) 28
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 10 0
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 110
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Rose St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour 2:04 pm 01/26/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report QS Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 548 10 6 529 24 5
Future Vol, veh/h 548 10 6 529 24 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 75 - - 0 50
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 596 11 7 575 26 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 607 0 898 298
Stage 1 - - - - 596 -
Stage 2 - - - - 302 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 967 - 279 698
Stage 1 - - - - 513 -
Stage 2 - - - - 724 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 967 - 276 698
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 276 -
Stage 1 - - - - 513 -
Stage 2 - - - - 716 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 17.8
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 276 698 - - 967 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 0.008 - - 0.007 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 19.4 10.2 - - 8.7 0
HCM Lane LOS C B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour 2:04 pm 01/26/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report QS Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 495 2 3 10 568 6 15
Future Vol, veh/h 495 2 3 10 568 6 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - 85 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 538 2 3 11 617 7 16
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 540 540 0 876 270
Stage 1 - - - - - 539 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 337 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.44 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.52 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 653 1025 - 288 728
Stage 1 - - - - - 549 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 695 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 900 900 - 283 728
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 283 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 549 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 684 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 12.5
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 502 - - 900 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 - - 0.016 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 - - 9.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour 2:04 pm 01/26/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report QS Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 61 471 15 25 535 71 6 2 25 26 2 72 Future Vol, veh/h 3 61 471 15 25 535 71 6 2 25 26 2 72
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 50 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 66 512 16 27 582 77 7 2 27 28 2 78
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 659 659 0 0 528 0 0 1004 1371 264 1070 1341 330 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 658 658 - 675 675 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 346 713 - 395 666 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver549 925 - - 1035 - - 196 145 734 175 151 666 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 420 459 - 410 451 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 643 434 - 602 456 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver888 888 - - 1035 - - 157 130 734 153 135 666 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 157 130 - 153 135 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 387 423 - 378 439 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 550 423 - 531 420 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s1.1 0.3 15.6 20.4
HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 376 888 - - 1035 - - 341
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 0.078 - - 0.026 - - 0.319
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.6 9.4 - - 8.6 - - 20.4
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.3 - - 0.1 - - 1.3
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Ashdale St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour 2:04 pm 01/26/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report QS Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 512 10 8 16 624 6 8 0 19 11 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 4 512 10 8 16 624 6 8 0 19 11 0 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 557 11 9 17 678 7 9 0 21 12 0 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 685 0 0 567 568 0 0 962 1308 284 1021 1310 343 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 571 571 - 734 734 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 391 737 - 287 576 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 904 - - 628 1000 - - 210 158 713 191 158 653 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 473 503 - 378 424 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 605 423 - 696 500 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 904 - - 825 825 - - 201 152 713 180 152 653 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 201 152 - 180 152 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 471 501 - 376 410 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 576 409 - 673 498 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.3 14.6 19.3
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 406 904 - - 825 - - 275
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.072 0.005 - - 0.032 - - 0.083
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.6 9 - - 9.5 - - 19.3
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.3
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Dale Ave & Standustrial St 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour 2:04 pm 01/26/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report QS Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 7 17 321 456 18
Future Vol, veh/h 6 7 17 321 456 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 8 18 349 496 20
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 717 258 516 0 - 0
Stage 1 506 - - - - -
Stage 2 211 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver364 741 1046 - - -
Stage 1 571 - - - - -
Stage 2 804 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver358 741 1046 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver454 - - - - -
Stage 1 561 - - - - -
Stage 2 804 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s11.3 0.4 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1046 - 454 741 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.014 0.01 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - 13 9.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0 0 - -
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing AM Peak Hour 2:04 pm 01/26/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report QS Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 929 929 1 4 3
Future Vol, veh/h 1 929 929 1 4 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 1010 1010 1 4 3
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1011 0 - 0 1417 506
Stage 1 - - - - 1011 -
Stage 2 - - - - 406 -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 387 - - - 190 438
Stage 1 - - - - 238 -
Stage 2 - - - - 587 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 387 - - - 189 438
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 212 -
Stage 1 - - - - 237 -
Stage 2 - - - - 587 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 18.6
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 387 - - - 272
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.028
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.3 - - - 18.6
HCM Lane LOS B - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Rose St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour 4:13 pm 03/14/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 672 14 9 546 23 17
Future Vol, veh/h 672 14 9 546 23 17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 75 - - 0 50
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 730 15 10 593 25 18
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 745 0 1047 365
Stage 1 - - - - 730 -
Stage 2 - - - - 317 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 859 - 224 632
Stage 1 - - - - 438 -
Stage 2 - - - - 711 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 859 - 220 632
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 220 -
Stage 1 - - - - 438 -
Stage 2 - - - - 699 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 18.1
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 220 632 - - 859 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.114 0.029 - - 0.011 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 23.5 10.9 - - 9.2 0.1
HCM Lane LOS C B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour 4:13 pm 03/14/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 656 10 3 13 540 8 14
Future Vol, veh/h 656 10 3 13 540 8 14
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - 85 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 713 11 3 14 587 9 15
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 724 724 0 1047 362
Stage 1 - - - - - 719 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 328 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.44 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.52 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 499 874 - 224 635
Stage 1 - - - - - 444 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 702 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 761 761 - 219 635
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 219 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 444 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 687 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 15.2
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 376 - - 761 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 - - 0.023 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.2 - - 9.8 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour 4:13 pm 03/14/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 65 605 11 20 487 41 19 3 33 19 1 75 Future Vol, veh/h 11 65 605 11 20 487 41 19 3 33 19 1 75 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 50 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 12 71 658 12 22 529 45 21 3 36 21 1 82
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 574 574 0 0 670 0 0 1139 1448 335 1093 1432 287 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 830 830 - 596 596 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 309 618 - 497 836 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver621 995 - - 916 - - 156 130 661 169 133 710 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 331 383 - 457 490 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 676 479 - 523 381 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver893 893 - - 916 - - 125 115 661 143 118 710 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 125 115 - 143 118 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 300 347 - 414 478 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 583 468 - 444 346 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1 0.3 24.8 17.7
HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 241 893 - - 916 - - 385
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.248 0.093 - - 0.024 - - 0.268
HCM Control Delay (s) 24.8 9.4 - - 9 - - 17.7
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0.3 - - 0.1 - - 1.1
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Ashdale St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour 4:13 pm 03/14/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 11 637 1 3 499 12 9 0 1 10 1 10
Future Vol, veh/h 5 11 637 1 3 499 12 9 0 1 10 1 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 100 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 12 692 1 3 542 13 10 0 1 11 1 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 555 555 0 0 693 0 0 1005 1288 347 935 1282 278 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 727 727 - 555 555 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 278 561 - 380 727 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver639 1011 - - 898 - - 196 163 649 220 164 719 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 381 427 - 484 511 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 705 508 - 614 427 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver850 850 - - 898 - - 189 159 649 216 160 719 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 189 159 - 216 160 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 373 418 - 474 509 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 691 506 - 601 418 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s0.2 0.1 23.7 17.3
HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 203 850 - - 898 - - 316
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.054 0.02 - - 0.004 - - 0.072
HCM Control Delay (s) 23.7 9.3 - - 9 - - 17.3
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.2
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Dale Ave & Standustrial St 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour 4:13 pm 03/14/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 13 7 487 470 4
Future Vol, veh/h 9 13 7 487 470 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 14 8 529 511 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 794 258 515 0 - 0
Stage 1 513 - - - - -
Stage 2 281 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver325 741 1047 - - -
Stage 1 566 - - - - -
Stage 2 741 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver322 741 1047 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver433 - - - - -
Stage 1 561 - - - - -
Stage 2 741 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s11.4 0.1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1047 - 433 741 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.023 0.019 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - 13.5 10 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 0.1 - -
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour 4:13 pm 03/14/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBU EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 1054 969 1 7 4
Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 1054 969 1 7 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 2 1146 1053 1 8 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 770 1054 0 - 0 1518 527
Stage 1 - - - - - 1054 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 464 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver589 369 - - - 169 424
Stage 1 - - - - - 224 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 548 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver420 420 - - - 168 424
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 197 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 222 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 548 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 20.4
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 420 - - - 245
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.049
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.6 - - - 20.4
HCM Lane LOS B - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing PM Peak Hour 4:13 pm 03/14/2022 City of Stanton, CA Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBU EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 1054 969 1 7 4
Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 1054 969 1 7 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 2 1146 1053 1 8 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 770 1054 0 - 0 1518 527
Stage 1 - - - - - 1054 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 464 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver589 369 - - - 169 424
Stage 1 - - - - - 224 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 548 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver420 420 - - - 168 424
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 197 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 222 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 548 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 20.4
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 420 - - - 245
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.049
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.6 - - - 20.4
HCM Lane LOS B - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2
February 2023 Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study Appendix C – ICU Spreadsheets, HCM Reports, Synchro and SimTraffic Reports – Existing Plus Project Conditions
Intersection #1
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 244 1 1.00 0.15
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 384 1 1.45 0.17
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 144 0 0.55 0.17
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 251 1 1.00 0.16
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 325 1 1.42 0.14
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 134 0 0.58 0.14
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 116 1 1.00 0.07
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1429 3 3.75 0.24
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 94 0 0.25 0.24
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 114 1 1.00 0.07
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 2156 3 3.78 0.36
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 128 0 0.22 0.36
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.32 0.43
0.75 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
AM Existing + Project
Cerritos Ave
Beach Blvd
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
D
Total:
0.80 0.05
Intersection #1
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 223 1 1.00 0.14
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 450 1 1.51 0.19
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 146 0 0.49 0.19
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 259 1 1.00 0.16
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 318 1 1.42 0.14
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 131 0 0.58 0.14
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 171 1 1.00 0.11
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 2051 3 3.68 0.35
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 179 0 0.32 0.35
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 152 1 1.00 0.10
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 1839 3 3.73 0.31
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 131 0 0.27 0.31
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.35 0.44
0.79 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
PM Existing + Project
Cerritos Ave
Beach Blvd
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 D
0.84 Intersection #5
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 163 2 2.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 481 3 3.00 0.10
Comb. T-R 0
EB Right 133 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 231 2 2.00 0.08
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 585 3 3.00 0.12
Comb. T-R 0
WB Right 133 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 275 2 2.00 0.10
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1335 3 3.32 0.25
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 275 0 0.68 0.25
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 263 2 2.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 2182 3 3.60 0.38
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 245 0 0.40 0.38
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.18 0.47
0.66 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service C
0.71 0.05
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
AM Existing + Project
Katella Ave
Beach Blvd
Intersection #5
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 303 2 2.00 0.11
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 688 3 3.00 0.14
Comb. T-R 0
EB Right 210 1 1.00 0.13
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 253 2 2.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 564 3 3.00 0.12
Comb. T-R 0
WB Right 169 1 1.00 0.11
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 310 2 2.00 0.11
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1938 3 3.60 0.34
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 217 0 0.40 0.34
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 225 2 2.00 0.08
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 1750 3 3.63 0.30
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 177 0 0.37 0.30
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.23 0.41
0.65 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
PM Existing + Project
Katella Ave
Beach Blvd
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 B
0.70 Intersection #10
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 88 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 516 1 1.59 0.20
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 134 0 0.41 0.20
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 78 1 1.00 0.05
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 467 1 1.64 0.18
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 103 0 0.36 0.18
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 93 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 209 1 1.63 0.08
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 47 0 0.37 0.08
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 131 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 297 1 1.26 0.15
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 175 0 0.74 0.15
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.25 0.21
0.46 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service A
0.51 0.05
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
AM Existing + Project
Cerritos Ave
Dale Ave
Intersection #10
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 83 1 1.00 0.05
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 552 1 1.64 0.21
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 122 0 0.36 0.21
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 53 1 1.00 0.03
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 493 1 1.76 0.17
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 66 0 0.24 0.17
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 197 1 1.00 0.12
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 366 1 1.64 0.14
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 79 0 0.36 0.14
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 81 1 1.00 0.05
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 337 1 1.61 0.13
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 81 0 0.39 0.13
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.24 0.25
0.50 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
PM Existing + Project
Cerritos Ave
Dale Ave
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 A
0.55 SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM SimTraffic Report
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25
End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10220 10325 10056 10294 10197 10360 10099
Vehs Exited 10096 10242 9960 10219 10066 10256 10059
Starting Vehs 101 108 121 146 120 119 120
Ending Vehs 225 191 217 221 251 223 160
Travel Distance (mi) 2776 2828 2731 2826 2758 2809 2756 Travel Time (hr) 243.5 225.4 254.8 303.6 292.7 241.7 285.9 Total Delay (hr) 148.4 128.6 161.5 206.8 198.3 145.6 191.6 Total Stops 1173 1087 1246 1430 1389 1040 1172
Fuel Used (gal) 119.3 116.3 120.9 134.8 130.7 119.1 128.3 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25
End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10277 10167 10273 10225
Vehs Exited 10229 10088 10194 10144
Starting Vehs 137 119 133 118
Ending Vehs 185 198 212 202
Travel Distance (mi) 2808 2769 2796 2786
Travel Time (hr) 310.6 244.3 297.1 269.9
Total Delay (hr) 214.7 149.5 201.4 174.6
Total Stops 1319 1573 1459 1288
Fuel Used (gal) 135.8 120.2 132.3 125.8
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 7:25
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM SimTraffic Report
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 8:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10220 10325 10056 10294 10197 10360 10099
Vehs Exited 10096 10242 9960 10219 10066 10256 10059
Starting Vehs 101 108 121 146 120 119 120
Ending Vehs 225 191 217 221 251 223 160
Travel Distance (mi) 2776 2828 2731 2826 2758 2809 2756 Travel Time (hr) 243.5 225.4 254.8 303.6 292.7 241.7 285.9 Total Delay (hr) 148.4 128.6 161.5 206.8 198.3 145.6 191.6 Total Stops 1173 1087 1246 1430 1389 1040 1172
Fuel Used (gal) 119.3 116.3 120.9 134.8 130.7 119.1 128.3 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 8:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 10277 10167 10273 10225
Vehs Exited 10229 10088 10194 10144
Starting Vehs 137 119 133 118
Ending Vehs 185 198 212 202
Travel Distance (mi) 2808 2769 2796 2786
Travel Time (hr) 310.6 244.3 297.1 269.9
Total Delay (hr) 214.7 149.5 201.4 174.6
Total Stops 1319 1573 1459 1288
Fuel Used (gal) 135.8 120.2 132.3 125.8
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM SimTraffic Report
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 36.1 4.6 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) 658.7 872.3 684.3 855.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.4 12.9 9.1 9.1 4.1 9.7 2.4 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 1566.3 663.1 2980.8 1643.7 994.3 898.3 5.7 0.3 115.9 73.6 0.4 Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.4 13.0 9.1 9.1 4.1 9.7 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1567.3 668.0 2977.6 1640.2 996.0 898.7 3.4 0.0 115.7 71.9 0.0 Total Stops 0 0 30 9 23 16 38 277 0 21 34 9
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.43 0.82 1.15 1.07 0.97 0.19 0.00 0.95 0.97 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.5 1.1 1.5 3.6 170.3 3.6 1.2 2.0 142.8 Travel Time (hr) 0.2 0.6 49.2 13.7 23.0 4.2 9.9 8.1 0.1 0.8 0.8 5.2 Vehicles Entered 0 1 64 9 19 15 37 1480 32 22 35 2460
Vehicles Exited 0 0 55 0 8 9 24 1477 32 21 34 2460
Hourly Exit Rate 0 0 55 0 8 9 24 1477 32 21 34 2460
Input Volume 1 1 146 24 57 17 43 1533 34 23 36 2454
% of Volume 0 0 38 0 14 53 56 96 94 91 94 100
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 54.9
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 45.8
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 49.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 0.1 42.4
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 48.4
Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.0 41.4
Total Stops 0 457
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.11
Travel Dist (mi) 0.5 331.1
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 115.7
Vehicles Entered 8 4182
Vehicles Exited 8 4128
Hourly Exit Rate 8 4128
Input Volume 9 4378
% of Volume 89 94
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM SimTraffic Report
3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 3.2 9.4 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) 168.1 940.6 873.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 2.2 10.2 9.5 3.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.0 26.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 130.7 2443.1 1908.3 7.7 0.3 78.7 42.5 0.7 0.2 22.2 Stop Delay (hr) 0.2 2.2 10.2 9.5 2.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 24.8 Stop Del/Veh (s) 129.9 2443.3 1909.1 5.5 0.0 78.5 40.6 0.0 0.0 21.0 Total Stops 0 59 9 13 254 0 5 15 0 0 355
Stop/Veh 0.98 0.60 0.72 0.16 0.00 0.83 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.08 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 3.2 0.7 0.9 218.1 4.7 0.6 1.9 291.6 0.9 522.5 Travel Time (hr) 0.2 5.5 19.6 19.0 10.7 0.2 0.2 0.3 10.4 0.0 66.1 Vehicles Entered 0 59 12 15 1564 33 5 16 2519 8 4231
Vehicles Exited 0 55 4 7 1558 33 5 16 2520 8 4206
Hourly Exit Rate 0 55 4 7 1558 33 5 16 2520 8 4206
Input Volume 1 72 39 39 1587 32 6 16 2637 8 4437
% of Volume 0 76 10 18 98 103 83 100 96 100 95
4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 1.8 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 728.2 784.0 0.1 0.1 1.8 2.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 Total Delay (hr) 3.0 5.7 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 11.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2165.1 1567.4 979.4 186.3 396.6 231.2 0.2 0.0 23.6 1.0 0.5 9.3 Stop Delay (hr) 3.0 5.7 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.1 Stop Del/Veh (s) 2164.3 1567.5 977.6 186.9 397.4 230.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 Total Stops 4 9 1 6 2 8 2 0 17 2 0 51
Stop/Veh 0.80 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.01 Travel Dist (mi) 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 66.0 0.2 2.6 338.7 3.2 412.0 Travel Time (hr) 4.8 11.8 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 2.4 0.0 0.2 12.2 0.1 32.9 Vehicles Entered 5 12 1 6 2 8 1589 5 19 2535 24 4206
Vehicles Exited 1 6 1 6 2 8 1589 5 20 2537 24 4199
Hourly Exit Rate 1 6 1 6 2 8 1589 5 20 2537 24 4199
Input Volume 9 27 2 5 2 9 1604 5 20 2701 27 4411
% of Volume 11 22 50 120 100 89 99 100 100 94 89 95
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM SimTraffic Report
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr) 85.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 66.9
Total Delay (hr) 86.8
Total Del/Veh (s) 1523.6
Stop Delay (hr) 83.3
Stop Del/Veh (s) 1462.7
Total Stops 863
Stop/Veh 4.21
Travel Dist (mi) 1265.6
Travel Time (hr) 214.8
Vehicles Entered 4357
Vehicles Exited 50
Hourly Exit Rate 50
Input Volume 13226
% of Volume 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LT R UL T T T TR UL T T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 366 495 97 230 563 569 490 10 161 187 32 2 Average Queue (ft) 310 402 9 188 347 233 61 0 56 19 1 0 95th Queue (ft) 449 642 53 282 724 638 318 5 126 111 28 2 Link Distance (ft) 341 488 546 546 546 546 296 296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 77 69 24 1 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 96 4 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 55 125 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 97 2 82 0 4 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 55 0 308 0 25 0
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 1
Average Queue (ft) 0
95th Queue (ft) 1
Link Distance (ft) 296
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR R T T T TR UL
Maximum Queue (ft) 161 504 82 328 313 155 4 63
Average Queue (ft) 77 442 8 90 79 23 0 18
95th Queue (ft) 228 601 57 325 299 134 3 50
Link Distance (ft) 293 484 646 646 646 646
Upstream Blk Time (%) 14 76
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 100 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 19 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/13/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave
Movement EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR UL T T UL T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 257 58 53 55 6 48 12 8 10 5
Average Queue (ft) 199 12 13 4 0 13 0 0 0 0
95th Queue (ft) 315 54 48 36 3 39 7 5 6 4
Link Distance (ft) 249 243 206 206 646 646 646 646
Upstream Blk Time (%) 66
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 22 0
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 530
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/15/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM SimTraffic Report
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10737 10889 10889 10928 10813 10792 10871
Vehs Exited 10639 10765 10830 10897 10752 10629 10844
Starting Vehs 124 140 136 128 126 115 125
Ending Vehs 222 264 195 159 187 278 152
Travel Distance (mi) 2878 2928 2939 2970 2920 2873 2942 Travel Time (hr) 384.2 467.5 416.0 333.3 429.7 460.3 374.9 Total Delay (hr) 285.7 367.3 315.3 231.3 329.4 361.7 273.9 Total Stops 2098 1622 1234 1423 1401 1831 985
Fuel Used (gal) 156.7 176.6 164.6 145.9 166.7 173.0 154.8 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 11055 10982 10687 10861
Vehs Exited 10946 10895 10628 10782
Starting Vehs 160 130 140 127
Ending Vehs 269 217 199 211
Travel Distance (mi) 2982 2985 2847 2927
Travel Time (hr) 369.0 299.2 438.9 397.3
Total Delay (hr) 266.9 197.0 341.4 297.0
Total Stops 1524 1763 1347 1518
Fuel Used (gal) 154.6 138.6 166.9 159.8
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 4:25
End Time 4:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/15/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM SimTraffic Report
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10737 10889 10889 10928 10813 10792 10871
Vehs Exited 10639 10765 10830 10897 10752 10629 10844
Starting Vehs 124 140 136 128 126 115 125
Ending Vehs 222 264 195 159 187 278 152
Travel Distance (mi) 2878 2928 2939 2970 2920 2873 2942 Travel Time (hr) 384.2 467.5 416.0 333.3 429.7 460.3 374.9 Total Delay (hr) 285.7 367.3 315.3 231.3 329.4 361.7 273.9 Total Stops 2098 1622 1234 1423 1401 1831 985
Fuel Used (gal) 156.7 176.6 164.6 145.9 166.7 173.0 154.8 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 11055 10982 10687 10861
Vehs Exited 10946 10895 10628 10782
Starting Vehs 160 130 140 127
Ending Vehs 269 217 199 211
Travel Distance (mi) 2982 2985 2847 2927
Travel Time (hr) 369.0 299.2 438.9 397.3
Total Delay (hr) 266.9 197.0 341.4 297.0
Total Stops 1524 1763 1347 1518
Fuel Used (gal) 154.6 138.6 166.9 159.8
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/15/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM SimTraffic Report
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.4 3.9 13.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 4.3 134.3 2.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 56.9 744.5 703.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 261.2 264.5 250.9 260.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 2.2 6.3 11.4 2.6 5.5 1.3 0.0 2.0 7.5 2.5 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 326.8 2836.4 1362.9 203.8 168.6 2.1 0.6 718.1 536.6 5.7 1.2 Stop Delay (hr) 0.2 2.2 6.3 11.3 2.6 5.4 0.4 0.0 2.0 7.5 1.8 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 325.9 2833.7 1360.8 201.3 164.7 0.6 0.0 721.4 538.2 3.9 0.1 Total Stops 0 23 6 32 30 76 112 0 7 32 83 0
Stop/Veh 0.96 0.75 1.07 0.65 0.65 0.05 0.00 0.70 0.64 0.05 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 1.4 0.4 1.9 5.1 13.0 260.2 7.0 0.5 2.5 93.1 1.4 Travel Time (hr) 0.2 2.7 10.2 25.1 2.8 6.0 10.1 0.3 2.9 11.9 140.0 2.2 Vehicles Entered 0 24 6 29 45 112 2258 60 10 48 1603 24 Vehicles Exited 0 20 0 15 44 114 2259 60 8 40 1599 24
Hourly Exit Rate 0 20 0 15 44 114 2259 60 8 40 1599 24
Input Volume 1 26 20 73 42 119 2343 62 12 58 1945 27
% of Volume 0 77 0 21 105 96 96 97 67 69 82 89
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr) 159.7
Denied Del/Veh (s) 124.5
Total Delay (hr) 41.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 35.2
Stop Delay (hr) 39.5
Stop Del/Veh (s) 33.5
Total Stops 401
Stop/Veh 0.09
Travel Dist (mi) 386.6
Travel Time (hr) 214.4
Vehicles Entered 4219
Vehicles Exited 4183
Hourly Exit Rate 4183
Input Volume 4728
% of Volume 88
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/15/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM SimTraffic Report
3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 3.4 8.3 11.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 24.5 Denied Del/Veh (s) 304.7 250.4 906.3 966.2 0.4 0.0 0.1 16.7 1.5 0.0 20.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.6 3.9 9.3 10.2 6.0 0.0 3.2 6.3 2.5 0.0 41.9 Total Del/Veh (s) 2148.1 371.0 2781.2 2438.3 8.7 0.6 1043.3 906.7 5.3 1.1 35.1 Stop Delay (hr) 0.6 3.9 9.3 10.2 4.5 0.0 3.2 6.3 1.5 0.0 39.5 Stop Del/Veh (s) 2146.0 370.3 2780.9 2437.8 6.6 0.0 1043.3 905.1 3.3 0.0 33.0 Total Stops 1 36 7 11 295 0 11 25 150 0 536
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.95 0.58 0.73 0.12 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.12 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 1.9 0.5 0.7 341.6 4.9 1.1 2.4 191.6 0.7 545.4 Travel Time (hr) 0.7 7.4 17.6 21.7 17.9 0.2 3.2 6.5 9.7 0.0 84.9 Vehicles Entered 1 37 10 13 2467 35 10 24 1668 6 4271
Vehicles Exited 0 31 2 4 2463 35 7 15 1666 6 4229
Hourly Exit Rate 0 31 2 4 2463 35 7 15 1666 6 4229
Input Volume 2 53 32 40 2510 34 14 31 2027 8 4751
% of Volume 0 58 6 10 98 103 50 48 82 75 89
4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 0.9 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.8 Denied Del/Veh (s) 413.8 329.9 0.1 10.9 18.0 18.4 13.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 14.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.7 3.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 1.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.0 9.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 749.9 425.5 59.6 87.1 66.9 2.1 0.2 155.9 130.3 1.4 1.3 7.8 Stop Delay (hr) 1.7 3.8 0.5 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 8.2 Stop Del/Veh (s) 751.6 427.9 59.9 87.2 65.4 1.5 0.0 155.3 127.9 0.0 0.1 6.9 Total Stops 4 20 30 8 14 53 0 7 6 1 0 143
Stop/Veh 0.50 0.62 0.97 0.73 0.74 0.02 0.00 1.00 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.03 Travel Dist (mi) 0.3 1.4 1.5 0.5 0.8 99.5 0.4 1.0 0.9 223.4 3.4 333.1 Travel Time (hr) 2.6 7.1 0.6 0.3 0.5 17.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 8.2 0.1 37.3 Vehicles Entered 7 31 30 11 18 2411 10 7 7 1685 26 4243 Vehicles Exited 7 28 29 11 18 2410 10 7 7 1685 26 4238
Hourly Exit Rate 7 28 29 11 18 2410 10 7 7 1685 26 4238 Input Volume 8 36 28 14 21 2449 10 9 10 2089 34 4708
% of Volume 88 78 104 79 86 98 100 78 70 81 76 90
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/15/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM SimTraffic Report
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr) 201.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 145.9
Total Delay (hr) 92.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 1657.7
Stop Delay (hr) 87.2
Stop Del/Veh (s) 1561.3
Total Stops 1080
Stop/Veh 5.37
Travel Dist (mi) 1265.1
Travel Time (hr) 336.7
Vehicles Entered 4445
Vehicles Exited 47
Hourly Exit Rate 47
Input Volume 14187
% of Volume 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/15/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LT R UL T T T TR UL T T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 158 496 104 230 532 540 362 8 249 313 299 160 Average Queue (ft) 70 383 17 131 211 99 27 0 193 221 101 16 95th Queue (ft) 239 643 68 281 609 427 212 6 320 434 332 122 Link Distance (ft) 341 488 546 546 546 546 296 296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 8 63 18 1 0 55 4 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 115 4 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 55 125 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 92 12 43 0 72 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 67 2 244 0 349 3
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 51
Average Queue (ft) 3
95th Queue (ft) 48
Link Distance (ft) 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR R T T T TR UL T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 212 499 46 454 436 405 206 219 490 475 422 258 Average Queue (ft) 115 440 6 124 107 74 21 149 216 119 52 13 95th Queue (ft) 301 611 42 499 456 375 193 284 600 466 300 149 Link Distance (ft) 293 484 646 646 646 646 546 546 546 546 Upstream Blk Time (%) 26 75 6 2 0 0 11 1 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 39 15 2 0 58 6 2 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 99 0 53 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 20 0 269 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/15/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave
Movement EB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR UL T T T TR UL T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 250 98 73 122 78 55 29 88 2 26 13
Average Queue (ft) 138 21 20 27 18 11 2 19 0 1 1
95th Queue (ft) 299 75 69 137 113 84 33 64 2 25 9
Link Distance (ft) 249 243 206 206 206 206 646 646 646
Upstream Blk Time (%) 33 0 7 4 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 8
Queuing Penalty (veh) 21 3
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 1221
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Rose St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 567 10 6 572 24 5
Future Vol, veh/h 567 10 6 572 24 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 75 - - 0 50
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 616 11 7 622 26 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 627 0 941 308
Stage 1 - - - - 616 -
Stage 2 - - - - 325 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 951 - 262 688
Stage 1 - - - - 501 -
Stage 2 - - - - 705 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 951 - 259 688
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 259 -
Stage 1 - - - - 501 -
Stage 2 - - - - 697 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 18.7
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 259 688 - - 951 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 0.008 - - 0.007 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 20.5 10.3 - - 8.8 0
HCM Lane LOS C B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 663 5 3 23 661 24 43
Future Vol, veh/h 663 5 3 23 661 24 43
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - 85 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 721 5 3 25 718 26 47
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 726 726 0 1139 363
Stage 1 - - - - - 724 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 415 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.44 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.52 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 497 873 - 195 634
Stage 1 - - - - - 441 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 635 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 792 792 - 188 634
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 188 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 441 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 613 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 18.3
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 343 - - 792 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.212 - - 0.036 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 18.3 - - 9.7 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 0.1 -
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 61 663 24 30 624 71 16 2 33 26 2 72 Future Vol, veh/h 3 61 663 24 30 624 71 16 2 33 26 2 72 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 50 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 66 721 26 33 678 77 17 2 36 28 2 78
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 755 755 0 0 747 0 0 1278 1693 374 1283 1668 378 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 872 872 - 783 783 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 406 821 - 500 885 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver476 851 - - 857 - - 123 92 623 122 95 620 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 312 366 - 353 403 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 593 387 - 521 361 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver812 812 - - 857 - - 96 81 623 102 83 620 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 96 81 - 102 83 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 285 335 - 323 387 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 495 372 - 446 330 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s0.8 0.4 28.3 29.5
HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 209 812 - - 857 - - 253
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.265 0.086 - - 0.038 - - 0.43
HCM Control Delay (s) 28.3 9.8 - - 9.4 - - 29.5
HCM Lane LOS D A - - A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.3 - - 0.1 - - 2
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Ashdale St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 713 9 8 15 717 6 8 0 18 11 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 4 713 9 8 15 717 6 8 0 18 11 0 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 775 10 9 16 779 7 9 0 20 12 0 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 786 0 0 785 785 0 0 1228 1624 393 1229 1626 393 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 788 788 - 833 833 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 440 836 - 396 793 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 829 - - 456 829 - - 134 102 606 134 101 606 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 350 400 - 329 382 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 566 381 - 601 398 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 829 - - 635 635 - - 127 98 606 125 97 606 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 127 98 - 125 97 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 348 398 - 327 367 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 534 366 - 579 396 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.3 19.3 25.2
HCM LOS C D
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 280 829 - - 635 - - 201
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 0.005 - - 0.039 - - 0.114
HCM Control Delay (s) 19.3 9.4 - - 10.9 - - 25.2
HCM Lane LOS C A - - B - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.4
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Dale Ave & Standustrial St 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 10 21 367 524 22
Future Vol, veh/h 9 10 21 367 524 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 11 23 399 570 24
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 828 297 594 0 - 0
Stage 1 582 - - - - -
Stage 2 246 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver309 699 978 - - -
Stage 1 522 - - - - -
Stage 2 772 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver302 699 978 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver407 - - - - -
Stage 1 509 - - - - -
Stage 2 772 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s12 0.5 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 978 - 407 699 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - 0.024 0.016 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - 14.1 10.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 0 - -
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project AM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1004 939 1 4 4
Future Vol, veh/h 1 1004 939 1 4 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 1091 1021 1 4 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1022 0 - 0 1460 511
Stage 1 - - - - 1022 -
Stage 2 - - - - 438 -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 382 - - - 181 435
Stage 1 - - - - 234 -
Stage 2 - - - - 565 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 382 - - - 180 435
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 207 -
Stage 1 - - - - 233 -
Stage 2 - - - - 565 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 18.2
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 382 - - - 281
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.031
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.5 - - - 18.2
HCM Lane LOS B - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Rose St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 712 14 9 576 23 17
Future Vol, veh/h 712 14 9 576 23 17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 75 - - 0 50
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 774 15 10 626 25 18
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 789 0 1107 387
Stage 1 - - - - 774 -
Stage 2 - - - - 333 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 827 - 204 611
Stage 1 - - - - 415 -
Stage 2 - - - - 698 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 827 - 200 611
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 200 -
Stage 1 - - - - 415 -
Stage 2 - - - - 685 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 19.4
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 200 611 - - 827 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.125 0.03 - - 0.012 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 25.6 11.1 - - 9.4 0.1
HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 773 20 3 43 747 23 36
Future Vol, veh/h 773 20 3 43 747 23 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - 85 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 840 22 3 47 812 25 39
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 862 862 0 1357 431
Stage 1 - - - - - 851 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 506 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.44 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.52 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 407 776 - 140 573
Stage 1 - - - - - 379 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 571 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 727 727 - 130 573
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 130 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 379 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 532 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 24.7
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 246 - - 727 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.261 - - 0.069 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 24.7 - - 10.3 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - 0.2 -
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 65 731 22 26 720 41 28 3 38 19 1 75 Future Vol, veh/h 11 65 731 22 26 720 41 28 3 38 19 1 75 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 50 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 12 71 795 24 28 783 45 30 3 41 21 1 82
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 827 828 0 0 819 0 0 1421 1857 410 1427 1847 414 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 973 973 - 862 862 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 448 884 - 565 985 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver429 799 - - 805 - - 97 73 591 96 74 587 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 271 329 - 316 370 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 560 362 - 477 324 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver686 686 - - 805 - - 73 62 591 76 63 587 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 73 62 - 76 63 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 238 289 - 278 357 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 464 349 - 386 285 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1 0.3 57.8 30.7
HCM LOS F D
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 139 686 - - 805 - - 241
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.54 0.12 - - 0.035 - - 0.428
HCM Control Delay (s) 57.8 11 - - 9.6 - - 30.7
HCM Lane LOS F B - - A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.6 0.4 - - 0.1 - - 2
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Ashdale St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 11 764 0 2 736 12 7 0 0 10 1 10
Future Vol, veh/h 5 11 764 0 2 736 12 7 0 0 10 1 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 100 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 12 830 0 2 800 13 8 0 0 11 1 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 813 813 0 0 830 0 0 1269 1681 415 1260 1675 407 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 864 864 - 811 811 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 405 817 - 449 864 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver438 810 - - 798 - - 125 94 586 127 94 593 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 315 369 - 339 391 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 593 388 - 559 369 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver635 635 - - 798 - - 119 91 586 124 91 593 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 119 91 - 124 91 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 306 359 - 330 390 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 579 387 - 544 359 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s0.2 0 37.3 26
HCM LOS E D
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 119 635 - - 798 - - 194
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 0.027 - - 0.003 - - 0.118
HCM Control Delay (s) 37.3 10.8 - - 9.5 - - 26
HCM Lane LOS E B - - A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.4
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Dale Ave & Standustrial St 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 17 10 603 514 7
Future Vol, veh/h 13 17 10 603 514 7
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 18 11 655 559 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 913 284 567 0 - 0
Stage 1 563 - - - - -
Stage 2 350 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver273 713 1001 - - -
Stage 1 534 - - - - -
Stage 2 684 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver270 713 1001 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver392 - - - - -
Stage 1 528 - - - - -
Stage 2 684 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s12.1 0.1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1001 - 392 713 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.036 0.026 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 - 14.5 10.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 0.1 - -
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center Existing+Project PM 10:25 am 04/08/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBU EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 1093 978 1 10 7
Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 1093 978 1 10 7
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 2 1188 1063 1 11 8
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 777 1064 0 - 0 1545 532
Stage 1 - - - - - 1064 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 481 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver584 364 - - - 163 421
Stage 1 - - - - - 221 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 537 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver415 415 - - - 162 421
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 193 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 219 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 537 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 20.7
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 415 - - - 248
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.075
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.8 - - - 20.7
HCM Lane LOS B - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2
February 2023 Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study Appendix D – ICU Spreadsheets, HCM Reports, Synchro and SimTraffic Reports – 2050 Cumulative Conditions
Intersection #1
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 143 1 1.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 365 1 1.47 0.15
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 130 0 0.53 0.15
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 175 1 1.00 0.11
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 359 1 1.53 0.15
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 109 0 0.47 0.15
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 70 1 1.00 0.04
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1521 3 3.78 0.25
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 89 0 0.22 0.25
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 105 1 1.00 0.07
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 2373 3 3.77 0.39
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 147 0 0.23 0.39
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.26 0.44
0.70 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
Cerritos Ave
Beach Blvd
AM 2050 without Project
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
C
Total:
0.75 0.05
Intersection #1
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 187 1 1.00 0.12
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 476 1 1.55 0.19
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 137 0 0.45 0.19
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 146 1 1.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 333 1 1.48 0.14
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 117 0 0.52 0.14
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 136 1 1.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 2247 3 3.75 0.38
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 153 0 0.26 0.38
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 128 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 1892 3 3.70 0.32
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 151 0 0.30 0.32
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.28 0.46
0.74 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
Cerritos Ave
Beach Blvd
PM 2050 without Project
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 C
0.79 Intersection #5
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 166 2 2.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 552 3 3.00 0.12
Comb. T-R 0
EB Right 153 1 1.00 0.10
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 263 2 2.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 669 3 3.00 0.14
Comb. T-R 0
WB Right 148 1 1.00 0.09
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 313 2 2.00 0.11
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1414 3 3.28 0.27
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 308 0 0.72 0.27
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 213 2 2.00 0.07
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 2209 3 3.62 0.38
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 231 0 0.38 0.38
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.21 0.49
0.70 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service C
0.75 0.05
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
Katella Ave
Beach Blvd
AM 2050 without Project
Intersection #5
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 302 2 2.00 0.10
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 791 3 3.00 0.16
Comb. T-R 0
EB Right 241 1 1.00 0.15
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 283 2 2.00 0.10
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 646 3 3.00 0.13
Comb. T-R 0
WB Right 190 1 1.00 0.12
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 353 2 2.00 0.12
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1958 3 3.55 0.35
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 250 0 0.45 0.35
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 195 2 2.00 0.07
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 1811 3 3.66 0.31
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 170 0 0.34 0.31
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.26 0.43
0.70 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
Katella Ave
Beach Blvd
PM 2050 without Project
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 C
0.75 Intersection #10
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 102 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 446 1 1.71 0.16
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 76 0 0.29 0.16
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 77 1 1.00 0.05
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 483 1 1.61 0.19
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 118 0 0.39 0.19
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 60 1 1.00 0.04
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 240 1 1.66 0.09
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 49 0 0.34 0.09
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 151 1 1.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 342 1 1.25 0.17
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 205 0 0.75 0.17
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.25 0.21
0.46 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service A
0.51 0.05
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
Cerritos Ave
Dale Ave
AM 2050 without Project
Intersection #10
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 101 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 544 1 1.71 0.20
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 94 0 0.29 0.20
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 54 1 1.00 0.03
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 436 1 1.70 0.16
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 76 0 0.30 0.16
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 93 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 421 1 1.69 0.16
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 77 0 0.31 0.16
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 93 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 388 1 1.60 0.15
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 98 0 0.40 0.15
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.23 0.21
0.45 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
Cerritos Ave
Dale Ave
PM 2050 without Project
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 A
0.50 SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM SimTraffic Report
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25
End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10289 10483 10338 10547 10614 10411 10403
Vehs Exited 10282 10425 10291 10526 10560 10339 10318
Starting Vehs 123 114 119 140 111 99 93
Ending Vehs 130 172 166 161 165 171 178
Travel Distance (mi) 2818 2869 2818 2879 2897 2846 2830 Travel Time (hr) 130.9 165.9 138.4 156.2 145.2 145.6 166.6 Total Delay (hr) 34.8 68.0 42.2 57.9 46.1 48.7 70.2
Total Stops 557 987 547 680 1027 544 565
Fuel Used (gal) 93.1 103.2 94.6 100.4 99.0 96.7 101.0
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25
End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10523 10414 10694 10472
Vehs Exited 10473 10363 10643 10420
Starting Vehs 101 107 109 104
Ending Vehs 151 158 160 155
Travel Distance (mi) 2879 2839 2918 2859
Travel Time (hr) 133.6 138.0 145.5 146.6
Total Delay (hr) 35.4 41.1 46.1 49.1
Total Stops 569 600 573 665
Fuel Used (gal) 95.2 95.3 98.1 97.7
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 7:25
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM SimTraffic Report
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 8:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10289 10483 10338 10547 10614 10411 10403
Vehs Exited 10282 10425 10291 10526 10560 10339 10318
Starting Vehs 123 114 119 140 111 99 93
Ending Vehs 130 172 166 161 165 171 178
Travel Distance (mi) 2818 2869 2818 2879 2897 2846 2830 Travel Time (hr) 130.9 165.9 138.4 156.2 145.2 145.6 166.6 Total Delay (hr) 34.8 68.0 42.2 57.9 46.1 48.7 70.2
Total Stops 557 987 547 680 1027 544 565
Fuel Used (gal) 93.1 103.2 94.6 100.4 99.0 96.7 101.0
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 8:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 10523 10414 10694 10472
Vehs Exited 10473 10363 10643 10420
Starting Vehs 101 107 109 104
Ending Vehs 151 158 160 155
Travel Distance (mi) 2879 2839 2918 2859
Travel Time (hr) 133.6 138.0 145.5 146.6
Total Delay (hr) 35.4 41.1 46.1 49.1
Total Stops 569 600 573 665
Fuel Used (gal) 95.2 95.3 98.1 97.7
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM SimTraffic Report
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) 120.5 88.5 4.1 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.5 5.4 4.0 1.8 2.4 3.8 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 1650.7 815.4 2047.8 377.0 775.9 758.3 2.0 0.2 53.3 36.9 0.3 Stop Delay (hr) 0.3 0.5 5.4 4.0 1.8 2.4 3.8 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1647.8 814.4 2044.0 373.6 775.4 756.7 0.7 0.0 53.3 35.2 0.0 Total Stops 0 1 23 7 21 10 18 78 0 5 16 1
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.24 0.91 1.00 0.05 0.00 1.00 0.89 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.4 1.3 1.1 1.9 191.6 3.2 0.3 1.0 154.2 Travel Time (hr) 0.3 0.5 6.2 4.0 1.9 2.4 3.9 7.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 5.5 Vehicles Entered 0 1 24 7 17 10 18 1654 28 5 17 2657
Vehicles Exited 0 0 14 0 12 7 13 1654 28 5 17 2657
Hourly Exit Rate 0 0 14 0 12 7 13 1654 28 5 17 2657
Input Volume 1 1 26 8 16 11 18 1667 30 5 20 2657
% of Volume 0 0 54 0 75 64 72 99 93 100 85 100
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.9
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.7
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 19.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 0.1 15.7
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 18.6
Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.0 15.0
Total Stops 0 180
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.04
Travel Dist (mi) 0.7 357.0
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 32.5
Vehicles Entered 11 4449
Vehicles Exited 11 4418
Hourly Exit Rate 11 4418
Input Volume 10 4470
% of Volume 110 99
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM SimTraffic Report
3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 44.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 2.1 3.4 2.5 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 9.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 1189.7 435.1 1511.7 818.3 1.2 0.2 100.0 43.3 0.7 0.1 7.6 Stop Delay (hr) 0.3 2.1 3.4 2.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 8.6 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1189.2 434.8 1508.6 815.5 0.4 0.0 99.7 41.1 0.0 0.0 6.9 Total Stops 0 16 7 12 25 0 3 6 0 0 69
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.94 0.88 1.09 0.01 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 0.9 0.5 0.8 236.7 3.6 0.3 0.7 309.8 1.1 554.4 Travel Time (hr) 0.3 2.3 3.4 2.5 8.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 11.0 0.0 28.5 Vehicles Entered 0 17 7 10 1703 26 3 6 2661 9 4442
Vehicles Exited 0 14 2 5 1702 26 2 6 2664 10 4431
Hourly Exit Rate 0 14 2 5 1702 26 2 6 2664 10 4431
Input Volume 1 17 7 10 1712 26 3 6 2684 9 4475
% of Volume 0 82 29 50 99 100 67 100 99 111 99
4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 1.3 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 529.9 665.5 0.1 0.1 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 Total Delay (hr) 3.1 5.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 9.9 Total Del/Veh (s) 2236.5 1486.4 301.9 80.3 198.7 0.2 25.8 1.1 0.5 8.1 Stop Delay (hr) 3.1 5.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 9.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 2236.2 1486.7 300.8 80.8 197.4 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 7.4 Total Stops 3 9 2 5 3 1 15 0 0 38
Stop/Veh 0.60 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.01 Travel Dist (mi) 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.1 70.7 2.2 352.3 3.4 429.5 Travel Time (hr) 4.4 10.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 2.5 0.2 12.7 0.1 30.8 Vehicles Entered 5 12 2 5 3 1703 16 2633 25 4404
Vehicles Exited 1 5 1 5 3 1702 16 2635 26 4394
Hourly Exit Rate 1 5 1 5 3 1702 16 2635 26 4394
Input Volume 9 28 2 5 3 1704 17 2662 24 4454
% of Volume 11 18 50 100 100 100 94 99 108 99
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM SimTraffic Report
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr) 7.5
Denied Del/Veh (s) 5.9
Total Delay (hr) 38.9
Total Del/Veh (s) 1093.4
Stop Delay (hr) 36.2
Stop Del/Veh (s) 1018.2
Total Stops 287
Stop/Veh 2.24
Travel Dist (mi) 1340.9
Travel Time (hr) 91.7
Vehicles Entered 4522
Vehicles Exited 26
Hourly Exit Rate 26
Input Volume 13399
% of Volume 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LT R UL T T T UL T
Maximum Queue (ft) 317 282 96 198 305 214 120 63 25
Average Queue (ft) 160 130 17 123 85 49 13 18 1
95th Queue (ft) 361 344 69 234 347 276 130 50 16
Link Distance (ft) 341 488 546 546 546 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 17 1 3 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 11 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 55 125 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 76 1 49 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 0 203 0 0
Intersection: 3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR R T T T TR UL
Maximum Queue (ft) 140 268 58 41 33 25 2 38
Average Queue (ft) 63 135 3 8 6 2 0 8
95th Queue (ft) 205 291 30 72 64 36 2 28
Link Distance (ft) 293 484 646 646 646 646
Upstream Blk Time (%) 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 73 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0
Intersection: 4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave
Movement EB WB NB NB NB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR UL T T T UL
Maximum Queue (ft) 259 33 18 4 2 2 42
Average Queue (ft) 194 7 2 0 0 0 12
95th Queue (ft) 312 30 11 3 3 2 36
Link Distance (ft) 249 243 206 206 206
Upstream Blk Time (%) 62
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 160
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 231
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM SimTraffic Report
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 11603 11661 11518 11618 11259 11476 11393
Vehs Exited 11495 11627 11450 11516 11164 11382 11358
Starting Vehs 127 116 119 112 98 108 145
Ending Vehs 235 150 187 214 193 202 180
Travel Distance (mi) 3103 3179 3104 3134 3014 3075 3063 Travel Time (hr) 410.2 164.1 150.8 153.1 178.0 177.7 180.4 Total Delay (hr) 304.2 55.5 44.9 45.9 75.0 72.7 75.7
Total Stops 797 1586 747 1316 945 1139 1536
Fuel Used (gal) 167.7 111.8 104.9 107.1 110.2 111.3 112.5 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 11654 11518 11569 11527
Vehs Exited 11544 11439 11466 11444
Starting Vehs 103 119 126 111
Ending Vehs 213 198 229 195
Travel Distance (mi) 3136 3114 3109 3103
Travel Time (hr) 170.7 167.7 176.3 192.9
Total Delay (hr) 63.7 61.3 70.2 86.9
Total Stops 1424 1311 1562 1235
Fuel Used (gal) 111.9 110.5 112.4 116.0
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 4:25
End Time 4:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM SimTraffic Report
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 11603 11661 11518 11618 11259 11476 11393
Vehs Exited 11495 11627 11450 11516 11164 11382 11358
Starting Vehs 127 116 119 112 98 108 145
Ending Vehs 235 150 187 214 193 202 180
Travel Distance (mi) 3103 3179 3104 3134 3014 3075 3063 Travel Time (hr) 410.2 164.1 150.8 153.1 178.0 177.7 180.4 Total Delay (hr) 304.2 55.5 44.9 45.9 75.0 72.7 75.7
Total Stops 797 1586 747 1316 945 1139 1536
Fuel Used (gal) 167.7 111.8 104.9 107.1 110.2 111.3 112.5 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 11654 11518 11569 11527
Vehs Exited 11544 11439 11466 11444
Starting Vehs 103 119 126 111
Ending Vehs 213 198 229 195
Travel Distance (mi) 3136 3114 3109 3103
Travel Time (hr) 170.7 167.7 176.3 192.9
Total Delay (hr) 63.7 61.3 70.2 86.9
Total Stops 1424 1311 1562 1235
Fuel Used (gal) 111.9 110.5 112.4 116.0
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM SimTraffic Report
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 27.4 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 30.0 35.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.5 49.4 46.3 37.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 2.5 3.7 5.6 3.1 5.3 2.6 0.0 1.9 2.4 0.7 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 327.8 1894.7 528.6 448.6 390.3 3.8 0.5 696.6 541.2 1.2 0.4 Stop Delay (hr) 0.1 2.5 3.7 5.6 3.1 5.3 0.9 0.0 1.9 2.4 0.3 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 327.5 1891.4 526.0 448.4 388.9 1.3 0.0 697.4 540.7 0.5 0.0 Total Stops 0 27 7 41 23 46 369 0 9 14 19 0
Stop/Veh 0.96 1.00 1.08 0.92 0.94 0.15 0.00 0.90 0.88 0.01 0.00 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 1.6 0.4 2.7 2.7 5.2 287.6 5.0 0.5 0.8 121.2 1.8 Travel Time (hr) 0.1 2.7 3.7 6.1 3.2 5.5 12.3 0.2 2.1 2.7 32.2 0.4 Vehicles Entered 0 27 6 37 24 47 2476 43 10 16 2090 30
Vehicles Exited 0 24 0 24 21 43 2477 43 6 11 2088 30
Hourly Exit Rate 0 24 0 24 21 43 2477 43 6 11 2088 30
Input Volume 1 30 8 44 24 46 2488 47 8 14 2125 31
% of Volume 0 80 0 55 88 93 100 91 75 79 98 97
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr) 28.5
Denied Del/Veh (s) 21.2
Total Delay (hr) 28.1
Total Del/Veh (s) 20.9
Stop Delay (hr) 25.8
Stop Del/Veh (s) 19.3
Total Stops 555
Stop/Veh 0.11
Travel Dist (mi) 429.6
Travel Time (hr) 71.2
Vehicles Entered 4806
Vehicles Exited 4767
Hourly Exit Rate 4767
Input Volume 4866
% of Volume 98
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM SimTraffic Report
3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 407.8 138.1 17.2 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 3.2 3.2 5.4 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.7 0.5 0.0 16.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 1777.6 424.4 1645.1 1135.4 2.0 0.2 611.5 431.6 0.9 0.3 12.2 Stop Delay (hr) 0.5 3.2 3.2 5.3 0.4 0.0 1.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 14.7 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1775.9 424.2 1642.1 1132.5 0.5 0.0 610.6 429.5 0.0 0.0 11.0 Total Stops 1 25 7 18 96 0 9 6 3 0 165
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.06 0.04 0.00 1.12 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 Travel Dist (mi) 0.1 1.4 0.4 1.1 354.2 2.1 1.0 0.7 244.2 0.9 606.0 Travel Time (hr) 0.6 4.4 3.2 5.4 13.4 0.1 1.4 0.7 8.8 0.0 38.2 Vehicles Entered 1 27 7 16 2582 15 8 6 2110 8 4780
Vehicles Exited 0 21 1 6 2577 15 6 5 2109 8 4748
Hourly Exit Rate 0 21 1 6 2577 15 6 5 2109 8 4748
Input Volume 2 26 7 17 2577 14 9 6 2163 9 4830
% of Volume 0 81 14 35 100 107 67 83 98 89 98
4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 Denied Del/Veh (s) 262.3 204.3 0.1 1.7 1.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 3.6 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.0 7.7 Total Del/Veh (s) 1460.9 480.3 35.9 189.6 137.1 0.4 0.1 130.5 118.8 1.2 0.7 5.9 Stop Delay (hr) 0.8 3.6 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 6.7 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1460.3 480.7 36.3 190.5 136.2 0.1 0.0 129.5 116.2 0.0 0.0 5.1 Total Stops 2 22 26 7 20 14 0 10 9 4 0 114
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.88 0.87 0.01 0.00 0.91 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Travel Dist (mi) 0.1 1.1 1.3 0.3 0.9 102.1 0.4 1.4 1.2 275.7 4.8 389.2 Travel Time (hr) 1.0 5.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 3.8 0.0 0.5 0.3 10.0 0.2 22.8 Vehicles Entered 2 26 26 7 22 2469 10 10 9 2075 36 4692 Vehicles Exited 1 21 26 8 22 2468 10 10 9 2073 37 4685
Hourly Exit Rate 1 21 26 8 22 2468 10 10 9 2073 37 4685 Input Volume 3 29 26 9 22 2457 10 10 10 2138 37 4751
% of Volume 33 72 100 89 100 100 100 100 90 97 100 99
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM SimTraffic Report
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr) 31.8
Denied Del/Veh (s) 22.9
Total Delay (hr) 52.0
Total Del/Veh (s) 1075.8
Stop Delay (hr) 47.2
Stop Del/Veh (s) 976.8
Total Stops 834
Stop/Veh 4.79
Travel Dist (mi) 1424.8
Travel Time (hr) 132.2
Vehicles Entered 4949
Vehicles Exited 37
Hourly Exit Rate 37
Input Volume 14447
% of Volume 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LT R UL T T T TR UL T T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 217 460 100 222 483 477 426 106 184 231 145 33 Average Queue (ft) 81 200 39 157 219 175 116 7 92 76 26 1 95th Queue (ft) 229 479 100 275 573 557 448 97 227 275 164 29 Link Distance (ft) 341 488 546 546 546 546 296 296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 11 3 1 0 0 13 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 23 5 1 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 55 125 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 77 32 59 0 26 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 34 3 365 0 137 0
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 8
Average Queue (ft) 0
95th Queue (ft) 4
Link Distance (ft) 296
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR R T T T TR UL T
Maximum Queue (ft) 214 386 72 164 155 110 5 123 87
Average Queue (ft) 103 196 4 22 17 9 0 47 10
95th Queue (ft) 285 434 39 138 125 93 4 131 79
Link Distance (ft) 293 484 646 646 646 646 546
Upstream Blk Time (%) 17 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 78 0 9 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 0 47 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave
Movement EB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR UL T T T TR UL T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 221 60 96 135 57 20 20 85 30 19 20 7 Average Queue (ft) 112 14 31 18 6 1 1 26 2 1 1 0
95th Queue (ft) 265 44 89 100 55 8 10 72 26 16 9 4
Link Distance (ft) 249 243 206 206 206 206 646 646 646 646 Upstream Blk Time (%) 16 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 11 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 69 0 1 0
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 690
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Rose St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM 4:37 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 630 11 7 608 28 6
Future Vol, veh/h 630 11 7 608 28 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 75 - - 0 50
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 685 12 8 661 30 7
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 697 0 1032 343
Stage 1 - - - - 685 -
Stage 2 - - - - 347 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 895 - 229 653
Stage 1 - - - - 462 -
Stage 2 - - - - 687 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 895 - 226 653
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 226 -
Stage 1 - - - - 462 -
Stage 2 - - - - 677 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 21.1
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 226 653 - - 895 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.135 0.01 - - 0.009 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 23.4 10.6 - - 9.1 0.1
HCM Lane LOS C B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM 4:37 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 569 2 3 11 653 7 17
Future Vol, veh/h 569 2 3 11 653 7 17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - 85 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 618 2 3 12 710 8 18
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 621 620 0 1004 310
Stage 1 - - - - - 619 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 385 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.44 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.52 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 580 956 - 238 686
Stage 1 - - - - - 499 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 657 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 833 833 - 234 686
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 234 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 499 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 645 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 13.7
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 439 - - 833 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.059 - - 0.018 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.7 - - 9.4 -
HCM Lane LOS B - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM 4:37 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 70 542 17 29 615 82 7 2 29 30 2 83 Future Vol, veh/h 3 70 542 17 29 615 82 7 2 29 30 2 83
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 50 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 76 589 18 32 668 89 8 2 32 33 2 90
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 758 757 0 0 607 0 0 1155 1577 304 1231 1542 379 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 756 756 - 777 777 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 399 821 - 454 765 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver474 850 - - 967 - - 152 109 692 134 114 619 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 366 414 - 356 405 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 598 387 - 555 410 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver814 814 - - 967 - - 115 95 692 113 100 619 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 115 95 - 113 100 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 330 374 - 321 392 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 491 374 - 476 370 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s1.1 0.4 18.5 28.7
HCM LOS C D
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 307 814 - - 967 - - 274
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.135 0.097 - - 0.033 - - 0.456
HCM Control Delay (s) 18.5 9.9 - - 8.8 - - 28.7
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.3 - - 0.1 - - 2.2
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Ashdale St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM 4:37 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 589 11 9 18 718 7 9 0 22 13 0 11
Future Vol, veh/h 5 589 11 9 18 718 7 9 0 22 13 0 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 640 12 10 20 780 8 10 0 24 14 0 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 788 0 0 652 652 0 0 1106 1504 326 1174 1506 394 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 656 656 - 844 844 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 450 848 - 330 662 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 827 - - 554 930 - - 165 120 670 147 120 605 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 421 460 - 324 377 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 558 376 - 657 457 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 827 - - 747 747 - - 156 115 670 137 115 605 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 156 115 - 137 115 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 418 457 - 322 362 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 526 361 - 630 454 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.4 16.7 24.4
HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 342 827 - - 747 - - 212
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.007 - - 0.039 - - 0.123
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.7 9.4 - - 10 - - 24.4
HCM Lane LOS C A - - B - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.4
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Dale Ave & Standustrial St 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM 4:37 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 8 20 369 524 21
Future Vol, veh/h 7 8 20 369 524 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 9 22 401 570 23
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 827 297 593 0 - 0
Stage 1 582 - - - - -
Stage 2 245 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver310 699 979 - - -
Stage 1 522 - - - - -
Stage 2 773 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver303 699 979 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver408 - - - - -
Stage 1 511 - - - - -
Stage 2 773 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s12 0.5 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 979 - 408 699 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - 0.019 0.012 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - 14 10.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 0 - -
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project AM 4:37 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1068 1068 1 5 3
Future Vol, veh/h 1 1068 1068 1 5 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 1161 1161 1 5 3
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1162 0 - 0 1628 581
Stage 1 - - - - 1162 -
Stage 2 - - - - 466 -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 327 - - - 148 391
Stage 1 - - - - 192 -
Stage 2 - - - - 547 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 327 - - - 148 391
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 171 -
Stage 1 - - - - 191 -
Stage 2 - - - - 547 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 22.3
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 327 - - - 217
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.04
HCM Control Delay (s) 16 - - - 22.3
HCM Lane LOS C - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Rose St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM 4:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 773 16 10 628 26 20
Future Vol, veh/h 773 16 10 628 26 20
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 75 - - 0 50
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 840 17 11 683 28 22
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 857 0 1204 420
Stage 1 - - - - 840 -
Stage 2 - - - - 364 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 779 - 177 582
Stage 1 - - - - 384 -
Stage 2 - - - - 673 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 779 - 173 582
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 173 -
Stage 1 - - - - 384 -
Stage 2 - - - - 658 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 21.8
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 173 582 - - 779 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.163 0.037 - - 0.014 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 29.8 11.4 - - 9.7 0.1
HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.1 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM 4:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 754 13 3 15 621 9 16
Future Vol, veh/h 754 13 3 15 621 9 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - 85 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 820 14 3 16 675 10 17
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 834 834 0 1203 417
Stage 1 - - - - - 827 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 376 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.44 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.52 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 424 795 - 177 585
Stage 1 - - - - - 390 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 664 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 688 688 - 172 585
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 172 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 390 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 645 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 17.5
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 314 - - 688 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 - - 0.028 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 17.5 - - 10.4 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0.1 -
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM 4:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 75 696 13 23 560 47 22 3 38 22 1 86 Future Vol, veh/h 13 75 696 13 23 560 47 22 3 38 22 1 86 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 50 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 82 757 14 25 609 51 24 3 41 24 1 93
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 660 660 0 0 771 0 0 1311 1666 386 1257 1648 330 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 956 956 - 685 685 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 355 710 - 572 963 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver548 924 - - 840 - - 116 96 612 128 98 666 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 277 335 - 404 447 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 635 435 - 472 332 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver812 812 - - 840 - - 88 82 612 103 84 666 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 88 82 - 103 84 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 244 295 - 356 434 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 528 422 - 384 293 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s1.1 0.3 36.5 23.9
HCM LOS E C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 181 812 - - 840 - - 307
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.378 0.118 - - 0.03 - - 0.386
HCM Control Delay (s) 36.5 10 - - 9.4 - - 23.9
HCM Lane LOS E B - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.6 0.4 - - 0.1 - - 1.8
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Ashdale St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM 4:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 13 732 1 3 574 14 10 0 1 11 1 11
Future Vol, veh/h 6 13 732 1 3 574 14 10 0 1 11 1 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 100 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 14 796 1 3 624 15 11 0 1 12 1 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 639 639 0 0 797 0 0 1158 1484 399 1078 1477 320 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 839 839 - 638 638 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 319 645 - 440 839 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver565 941 - - 821 - - 151 124 601 173 125 676 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 326 379 - 431 469 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 667 466 - 566 379 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver772 772 - - 821 - - 144 120 601 169 121 676 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 144 120 - 169 121 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 317 369 - 419 467 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 651 464 - 550 369 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s0.2 0 30.2 20.5
HCM LOS D C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 155 772 - - 821 - - 257
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.077 0.027 - - 0.004 - - 0.097
HCM Control Delay (s) 30.2 9.8 - - 9.4 - - 20.5
HCM Lane LOS D A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.3
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Dale Ave & Standustrial St 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM 4:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 15 8 560 540 5
Future Vol, veh/h 10 15 8 560 540 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 16 9 609 587 5
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 913 296 592 0 - 0
Stage 1 590 - - - - -
Stage 2 323 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver273 700 980 - - -
Stage 1 517 - - - - -
Stage 2 706 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver271 700 980 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver389 - - - - -
Stage 1 512 - - - - -
Stage 2 706 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s12 0.1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 980 - 389 700 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - 0.028 0.023 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 - 14.5 10.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 0.1 - -
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Without Project PM 4:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBU EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 1212 1114 1 8 5
Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 1212 1114 1 8 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 2 1317 1211 1 9 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 885 1212 0 - 0 1745 606
Stage 1 - - - - - 1212 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 533 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver509 309 - - - 128 377
Stage 1 - - - - - 179 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 505 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver354 354 - - - 127 377
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 157 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 178 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 505 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 24.2
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 354 - - - 202
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - - 0.07
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.3 - - - 24.2
HCM Lane LOS C - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2
February 2023 Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study Appendix E – ICU Spreadsheets, HCM Reports, Synchro and SimTraffic Reports – 2050 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions
Intersection #1
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 261 1 1.00 0.16
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 430 1 1.46 0.18
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 159 0 0.54 0.18
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 269 1 1.00 0.17
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 371 1 1.44 0.16
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 146 0 0.56 0.16
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 124 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1623 3 3.76 0.27
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 102 0 0.24 0.27
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 122 1 1.00 0.08
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 2455 3 3.77 0.41
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 147 0 0.23 0.41
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.35 0.48
0.84 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
AM 2050 + Project
Cerritos Ave
Beach Blvd
Critical Volumes N-S:
E-W:
D
Total:
0.89 0.05
Intersection #1
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 243 1 1.00 0.15
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 509 1 1.52 0.21
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 162 0 0.48 0.21
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 270 1 1.00 0.17
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 359 1 1.44 0.16
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 140 0 0.56 0.16
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 184 1 1.00 0.12
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 2332 3 3.69 0.39
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 195 0 0.31 0.39
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 164 1 1.00 0.10
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 2076 3 3.73 0.35
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 150 0 0.27 0.35
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.38 0.50
0.88 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
PM 2050 + Project
Cerritos Ave
Beach Blvd
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 0.93
E
Intersection #5
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 182 2 2.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 552 3 3.00 0.12
Comb. T-R 0
EB Right 153 1 1.00 0.10
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 263 2 2.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 671 3 3.00 0.14
Comb. T-R 0
WB Right 152 1 1.00 0.10
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 315 2 2.00 0.11
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 1506 3 3.32 0.28
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 311 0 0.68 0.28
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 287 2 2.00 0.10
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 2463 3 3.60 0.43
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 274 0 0.40 0.43
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.21 0.54
0.74 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service C
0.79 0.05
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
AM 2050 + Project
Katella Ave
Beach Blvd
Intersection #5
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 340 2 2.00 0.12
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 791 3 3.00 0.16
Comb. T-R 0
EB Right 241 1 1.00 0.15
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 283 2 2.00 0.10
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 646 3 3.00 0.13
Comb. T-R 0
WB Right 193 1 1.00 0.12
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 355 2 2.00 0.12
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 2180 3 3.59 0.38
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 247 0 0.41 0.38
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 243 2 2.00 0.08
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 1969 3 3.64 0.34
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 196 0 0.36 0.34
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.26 0.46
0.73 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
PM 2050 + Project
Katella Ave
Beach Blvd
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 0.78
C
Intersection #10
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: AM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 101 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 571 1 1.61 0.22
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 138 0 0.39 0.22
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 84 1 1.00 0.05
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 525 1 1.63 0.20
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 118 0 0.37 0.20
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 93 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 240 1 1.64 0.09
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 52 0 0.36 0.09
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 151 1 1.00 0.09
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 342 1 1.26 0.17
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 201 0 0.74 0.17
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.27 0.23
0.50 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service A
0.55 0.05
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
AM 2050 + Project
Cerritos Ave
Dale Ave
Intersection #10
E-W Street:
N-S Street:
Scenario: PM Peak
Lane Capacity: 1600
Dual Lefts Capacity (per lane): 1440
Movement Total
Volume
No. of
Lanes
Equivalent
Lanes
Movement
V/C
EB Left 95 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
EB Thru 616 1 1.66 0.23
Comb. T-R 1
EB Right 125 0 0.34 0.23
Comb. L-T-R 0
WB Left 57 1 1.00 0.04
Comb. L-T 0
WB Thru 545 1 1.76 0.19
Comb. T-R 1
WB Right 76 0 0.24 0.19
Comb. L-T-R 0
NB Left 199 1 1.00 0.12
Comb. L-T 0
NB Thru 421 1 1.67 0.16
Comb. T-R 1
NB Right 84 0 0.33 0.16
Comb. L-T-R 0
SB Left 93 1 1.00 0.06
Comb. L-T 0
SB Thru 388 1 1.61 0.15
Comb. T-R 1
SB Right 93 0 0.39 0.15
Comb. L-T-R 0
0.27 0.27
0.54 Lost Time
V/C
Level of Service
PM 2050 + Project
Cerritos Ave
Dale Ave
Critical Volumes
E-W:
N-S:
Total:
0.05 0.59
A
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM SimTraffic Report
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25
End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 11180 11471 11440 11730 11258 11576 11499
Vehs Exited 10943 11393 11317 11643 11092 11498 11367
Starting Vehs 130 128 148 151 116 121 134
Ending Vehs 367 206 271 238 282 199 266
Travel Distance (mi) 3009 3167 3122 3228 3049 3165 3136 Travel Time (hr) 441.9 224.9 318.1 266.2 363.9 245.6 302.0 Total Delay (hr) 338.9 116.5 211.3 155.8 259.6 137.2 194.7 Total Stops 1602 1183 1787 1210 1959 1231 1177
Fuel Used (gal) 171.0 124.6 145.7 136.4 154.5 129.7 140.8 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25
End Time 8:30 8:30 8:30 8:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 11575 11559 11513 11481
Vehs Exited 11459 11461 11413 11358
Starting Vehs 125 109 127 127
Ending Vehs 241 207 227 246
Travel Distance (mi) 3160 3167 3155 3136
Travel Time (hr) 310.4 317.0 318.8 310.9
Total Delay (hr) 202.3 208.7 210.9 203.6
Total Stops 1474 1157 1145 1389
Fuel Used (gal) 144.5 146.3 145.2 143.9
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 7:25
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM SimTraffic Report
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 8:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 11180 11471 11440 11730 11258 11576 11499
Vehs Exited 10943 11393 11317 11643 11092 11498 11367
Starting Vehs 130 128 148 151 116 121 134
Ending Vehs 367 206 271 238 282 199 266
Travel Distance (mi) 3009 3167 3122 3228 3049 3165 3136 Travel Time (hr) 441.9 224.9 318.1 266.2 363.9 245.6 302.0 Total Delay (hr) 338.9 116.5 211.3 155.8 259.6 137.2 194.7 Total Stops 1602 1183 1787 1210 1959 1231 1177
Fuel Used (gal) 171.0 124.6 145.7 136.4 154.5 129.7 140.8 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 8:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 11575 11559 11513 11481
Vehs Exited 11459 11461 11413 11358
Starting Vehs 125 109 127 127
Ending Vehs 241 207 227 246
Travel Distance (mi) 3160 3167 3155 3136
Travel Time (hr) 310.4 317.0 318.8 310.9
Total Delay (hr) 202.3 208.7 210.9 203.6
Total Stops 1474 1157 1145 1389
Fuel Used (gal) 144.5 146.3 145.2 143.9
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM SimTraffic Report
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 24.2 6.8 14.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 4.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 593.8 907.7 862.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 8.2 5.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 13.0 9.0 9.8 4.0 8.3 2.1 0.0 1.9 1.9 0.7 Total Del/Veh (s) 448.6 2951.0 1856.6 911.1 806.9 4.5 0.6 272.1 192.4 0.8 Stop Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 13.2 9.0 9.8 4.0 8.3 1.1 0.0 1.9 1.9 0.2 Stop Del/Veh (s) 455.2 2948.4 1853.7 908.7 803.1 2.3 0.1 272.8 191.7 0.3 Total Stops 0 0 29 8 20 15 33 238 1 22 30 24
Stop/Veh 0.28 0.73 1.05 0.94 0.89 0.14 0.03 0.88 0.83 0.01 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.4 1.1 1.5 3.6 190.1 4.1 1.4 2.0 164.0 Travel Time (hr) 0.3 0.2 37.5 15.8 24.0 4.1 8.4 8.5 0.2 2.0 2.1 10.5 Vehicles Entered 0 0 98 8 19 15 35 1648 35 25 35 2825
Vehicles Exited 0 0 89 0 8 10 26 1644 35 23 34 2823
Hourly Exit Rate 0 0 89 0 8 10 26 1644 35 23 34 2823
Input Volume 1 1 148 24 58 18 45 1739 37 24 37 2791
% of Volume 0 0 60 0 14 56 58 95 95 96 92 101
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 49.9
Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.8 36.9
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 50.9
Total Del/Veh (s) 0.2 38.3
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 49.5
Stop Del/Veh (s) 0.0 37.3
Total Stops 0 420
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.09
Travel Dist (mi) 0.6 374.8
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 113.6
Vehicles Entered 10 4753
Vehicles Exited 10 4702
Hourly Exit Rate 10 4702
Input Volume 10 4933
% of Volume 100 95
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM SimTraffic Report
3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 4.4 7.7 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 Denied Del/Veh (s) 213.9 224.0 789.8 941.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 3.9 10.6 9.1 5.7 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.0 31.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 1068.5 248.3 2124.3 1924.9 11.8 1.2 122.3 90.5 0.8 0.4 23.1 Stop Delay (hr) 0.3 3.9 10.6 9.1 4.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 29.1 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1068.2 248.3 2125.2 1925.4 9.2 0.3 121.8 88.7 0.0 0.0 21.7 Total Stops 1 52 10 14 308 1 7 14 0 0 407
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.91 0.56 0.82 0.18 0.03 1.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.08 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.9 242.0 4.8 0.8 1.7 337.8 0.9 592.9 Travel Time (hr) 0.4 8.5 18.3 19.6 13.9 0.2 0.3 0.5 12.1 0.0 73.8 Vehicles Entered 1 57 15 15 1738 34 6 15 2915 8 4804
Vehicles Exited 0 51 7 7 1719 33 7 14 2914 8 4760
Hourly Exit Rate 0 51 7 7 1719 33 7 14 2914 8 4760
Input Volume 1 74 39 40 1792 35 6 16 2973 9 4985
% of Volume 0 69 18 18 96 94 117 88 98 89 95
4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 2.5 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 21.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 917.8 800.0 0.1 3.3 11.0 76.4 42.0 47.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 Total Delay (hr) 3.2 5.8 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.4 1.2 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.0 14.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 2271.6 1882.2 1805.6 515.8 549.7 550.9 2.4 0.1 33.3 1.3 0.7 10.9 Stop Delay (hr) 3.2 5.8 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.4 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 13.2 Stop Del/Veh (s) 2270.8 1882.0 1803.6 515.7 550.4 549.9 1.9 0.0 30.7 0.0 0.0 9.9 Total Stops 3 8 1 5 4 8 41 0 18 2 0 90
Stop/Veh 0.60 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.02 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.02 Travel Dist (mi) 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 73.2 0.3 2.7 389.8 4.2 471.4 Travel Time (hr) 5.7 12.7 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.6 24.9 0.1 0.3 14.2 0.2 61.5 Vehicles Entered 4 11 1 5 4 8 1768 8 20 2919 32 4780
Vehicles Exited 1 4 0 4 3 7 1766 8 19 2918 31 4761
Hourly Exit Rate 1 4 0 4 3 7 1766 8 19 2918 31 4761
Input Volume 10 30 2 5 4 9 1811 8 22 3035 29 4965
% of Volume 10 13 0 80 75 78 98 100 86 96 107 96
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM SimTraffic Report
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr) 103.5
Denied Del/Veh (s) 71.8
Total Delay (hr) 96.4
Total Del/Veh (s) 1578.2
Stop Delay (hr) 91.9
Stop Del/Veh (s) 1503.1
Total Stops 917
Stop/Veh 4.17
Travel Dist (mi) 1439.1
Travel Time (hr) 248.8
Vehicles Entered 4940
Vehicles Exited 37
Hourly Exit Rate 37
Input Volume 14883
% of Volume 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LT R UL T T T TR UL T T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 373 493 93 230 565 582 519 70 218 288 221 2 Average Queue (ft) 310 413 14 173 290 171 54 4 98 78 28 0 95th Queue (ft) 448 631 67 285 687 553 301 75 223 277 168 2 Link Distance (ft) 341 488 546 546 546 546 296 296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 78 64 22 1 0 0 9 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 99 3 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 55 125 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 94 9 73 0 22 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 55 2 313 0 152 0
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 4
Average Queue (ft) 0
95th Queue (ft) 3
Link Distance (ft) 296
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR R T T T TR UL T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 209 506 80 404 395 285 191 84 17 2
Average Queue (ft) 115 446 8 110 103 69 26 23 1 0
95th Queue (ft) 302 595 55 444 433 350 223 65 17 2
Link Distance (ft) 293 484 646 646 646 646 546 546
Upstream Blk Time (%) 22 76 4 3 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 16 14 3 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 99 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 20 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave
Movement EB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR UL T T T TR UL T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 258 63 86 121 83 50 47 55 2 2 4 11
Average Queue (ft) 205 23 33 32 12 7 5 14 0 0 0 0
95th Queue (ft) 317 105 105 152 88 67 58 41 2 2 4 6
Link Distance (ft) 249 243 206 206 206 206 646 646 646 646 Upstream Blk Time (%) 68 1 8 2 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 19 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 87 1
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 765
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM SimTraffic Report
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10887 11446 11985 12158 11810 11440 11412
Vehs Exited 10858 11388 11897 12154 11744 11384 11375
Starting Vehs 146 165 152 167 158 174 172
Ending Vehs 175 223 240 171 224 230 209
Travel Distance (mi) 2844 3019 3216 3296 3158 3010 2990 Travel Time (hr) 993.1 787.8 430.0 399.9 754.2 961.6 1077.5 Total Delay (hr) 895.3 684.4 319.8 286.8 645.9 858.4 974.9 Total Stops 888 1338 1648 1289 1659 872 854
Fuel Used (gal) 292.5 250.3 174.4 169.8 247.5 289.6 314.7 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 4:25 4:25 4:25 4:25
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 11629 11757 12346 11682
Vehs Exited 11591 11543 12285 11622
Starting Vehs 144 166 162 153
Ending Vehs 182 380 223 217
Travel Distance (mi) 3087 3098 3342 3106
Travel Time (hr) 629.5 760.4 492.8 728.7
Total Delay (hr) 523.7 654.3 378.5 622.2
Total Stops 1081 2326 1485 1342
Fuel Used (gal) 216.0 248.3 192.4 239.6
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 4:25
End Time 4:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM SimTraffic Report
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10887 11446 11985 12158 11810 11440 11412
Vehs Exited 10858 11388 11897 12154 11744 11384 11375
Starting Vehs 146 165 152 167 158 174 172
Ending Vehs 175 223 240 171 224 230 209
Travel Distance (mi) 2844 3019 3216 3296 3158 3010 2990 Travel Time (hr) 993.1 787.8 430.0 399.9 754.2 961.6 1077.5 Total Delay (hr) 895.3 684.4 319.8 286.8 645.9 858.4 974.9 Total Stops 888 1338 1648 1289 1659 872 854
Fuel Used (gal) 292.5 250.3 174.4 169.8 247.5 289.6 314.7 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 11629 11757 12346 11682
Vehs Exited 11591 11543 12285 11622
Starting Vehs 144 166 162 153
Ending Vehs 182 380 223 217
Travel Distance (mi) 3087 3098 3342 3106
Travel Time (hr) 629.5 760.4 492.8 728.7
Total Delay (hr) 523.7 654.3 378.5 622.2
Total Stops 1081 2326 1485 1342
Fuel Used (gal) 216.0 248.3 192.4 239.6
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM SimTraffic Report
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 6.0 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 11.8 457.4 6.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.9 1028.7 1000.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 634.7 732.0 743.3 700.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 1.6 6.9 13.0 1.2 3.1 1.4 0.0 2.7 9.5 3.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 186.1 3096.4 1736.9 89.0 87.9 1.9 0.6 1217.2 903.3 8.3 2.3 Stop Delay (hr) 0.2 1.5 6.9 13.0 1.1 3.0 0.3 0.0 2.7 9.6 2.2 0.0 Stop Del/Veh (s) 185.4 3096.2 1737.5 85.7 83.3 0.4 0.0 1220.8 905.6 6.0 0.2 Total Stops 0 29 5 18 19 51 105 0 4 21 94 2
Stop/Veh 0.97 0.62 0.67 0.40 0.40 0.04 0.00 0.50 0.55 0.07 0.10 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 1.8 0.4 1.5 5.2 14.1 297.7 7.7 0.3 1.7 75.9 1.1 Travel Time (hr) 0.2 1.7 12.9 35.3 1.4 3.6 11.4 0.3 4.8 21.4 462.9 6.5 Vehicles Entered 0 29 6 24 44 121 2583 66 7 34 1305 20
Vehicles Exited 0 26 0 13 46 125 2581 67 6 27 1305 20
Hourly Exit Rate 0 26 0 13 46 125 2581 67 6 27 1305 20
Input Volume 1 30 21 77 45 122 2649 67 13 59 2210 31
% of Volume 0 87 0 17 102 102 97 100 46 46 59 65
2: Beach Blvd & Main St Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr) 505.9
Denied Del/Veh (s) 346.1
Total Delay (hr) 42.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 35.8
Stop Delay (hr) 40.4
Stop Del/Veh (s) 34.0
Total Stops 348
Stop/Veh 0.08
Travel Dist (mi) 407.5
Travel Time (hr) 562.4
Vehicles Entered 4239
Vehicles Exited 4216
Hourly Exit Rate 4216
Input Volume 5325
% of Volume 79
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM SimTraffic Report
3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 2.6 8.4 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.0 23.8 Denied Del/Veh (s) 98.2 164.7 915.1 956.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 19.1 3.9 0.0 19.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 2.8 8.8 10.3 2.7 0.0 2.7 5.4 1.9 0.0 35.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 1060.4 208.4 2872.4 2647.3 3.5 0.6 1235.3 1018.8 5.1 1.3 28.9 Stop Delay (hr) 0.3 2.8 8.8 10.3 1.5 0.0 2.7 5.4 0.9 0.0 32.7 Stop Del/Veh (s) 1058.2 207.7 2870.4 2644.8 1.9 0.0 1234.8 1017.4 2.4 0.1 27.0 Total Stops 1 48 8 12 160 0 8 18 125 0 380
Stop/Veh 1.00 0.98 0.73 0.86 0.06 0.00 1.00 0.95 0.09 0.00 0.09 Travel Dist (mi) 0.0 2.5 0.4 0.6 389.4 5.4 0.7 1.7 158.7 0.5 559.9 Travel Time (hr) 0.3 5.6 17.2 21.5 15.9 0.2 2.8 5.5 8.9 0.0 77.9 Vehicles Entered 1 49 9 12 2815 38 7 17 1374 4 4326
Vehicles Exited 0 42 1 2 2808 39 4 10 1374 4 4284
Hourly Exit Rate 0 42 1 2 2808 39 4 10 1374 4 4284
Input Volume 2 55 33 40 2826 35 15 31 2286 9 5332
% of Volume 0 76 3 5 99 111 27 32 60 44 80
4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR All Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 156.3 159.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.9 Total Delay (hr) 1.5 3.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.0 7.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 695.4 335.3 63.9 64.6 53.9 0.5 0.2 189.3 163.1 1.9 1.8 6.5 Stop Delay (hr) 1.5 3.5 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 6.7 Stop Del/Veh (s) 696.4 337.6 64.3 64.8 52.7 0.1 0.1 188.6 161.3 0.0 0.0 5.6 Total Stops 5 24 30 7 15 19 0 4 5 3 0 112
Stop/Veh 0.62 0.65 0.97 0.54 0.62 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.03 Travel Dist (mi) 0.4 1.6 1.5 0.5 1.0 113.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 187.4 2.9 310.3 Travel Time (hr) 1.9 5.2 0.6 0.3 0.4 4.5 0.0 0.2 0.3 7.1 0.1 20.7 Vehicles Entered 8 35 30 13 23 2751 10 3 5 1420 22 4320 Vehicles Exited 7 34 30 13 24 2752 10 4 6 1423 22 4325
Hourly Exit Rate 7 34 30 13 24 2752 10 4 6 1423 22 4325 Input Volume 8 38 31 14 23 2752 11 10 11 2345 38 5281
% of Volume 88 89 97 93 104 100 91 40 55 61 58 82
SimTraffic Performance Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM SimTraffic Report
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr) 532.0
Denied Del/Veh (s) 343.4
Total Delay (hr) 85.4
Total Del/Veh (s) 1514.3
Stop Delay (hr) 79.9
Stop Del/Veh (s) 1416.1
Total Stops 840
Stop/Veh 4.14
Travel Dist (mi) 1277.7
Travel Time (hr) 661.0
Vehicles Entered 4486
Vehicles Exited 50
Hourly Exit Rate 50
Input Volume 15938
% of Volume 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LT R UL T T T TR UL T T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 166 498 92 227 505 491 423 10 250 320 317 241 Average Queue (ft) 57 435 19 83 119 85 39 0 232 285 115 21 95th Queue (ft) 183 624 75 232 457 389 251 6 283 390 353 142 Link Distance (ft) 341 488 546 546 546 546 296 296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 77 7 1 0 74 10 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 50 6 1 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 55 125 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 85 22 23 0 95 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 65 5 147 0 524 3
Intersection: 2: Beach Blvd & Main St
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 84
Average Queue (ft) 8
95th Queue (ft) 83
Link Distance (ft) 296
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Beach Blvd & Pacific St
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR R T T T TR UL T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 219 494 46 285 280 230 48 204 353 347 319 212 Average Queue (ft) 93 433 3 46 44 29 4 138 150 83 46 17 95th Queue (ft) 258 594 31 276 274 202 69 273 498 391 286 171 Link Distance (ft) 293 484 646 646 646 646 546 546 546 546 Upstream Blk Time (%) 17 72 0 0 0 5 2 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 3 2 0 27 11 3 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 65 145
Storage Blk Time (%) 100 0 55 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 20 0 317 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
04/14/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Beach Blvd & Central Ave/Grand Ave
Movement EB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR UL T T T TR UL T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 231 94 83 107 35 26 14 76 5 3 13
Average Queue (ft) 131 22 18 13 5 1 1 14 0 0 1
95th Queue (ft) 293 69 70 84 53 18 7 51 3 3 7
Link Distance (ft) 249 243 206 206 206 206 646 646 646
Upstream Blk Time (%) 31 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 6 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 0
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 1221
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Rose St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM 5:35 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 646 11 7 650 28 5
Future Vol, veh/h 646 11 7 650 28 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 75 - - 0 50
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 702 12 8 707 30 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 714 0 1072 351
Stage 1 - - - - 702 -
Stage 2 - - - - 370 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 882 - 215 645
Stage 1 - - - - 453 -
Stage 2 - - - - 669 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 882 - 212 645
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 212 -
Stage 1 - - - - 453 -
Stage 2 - - - - 659 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 22.6
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 212 645 - - 882 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.144 0.008 - - 0.009 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 24.8 10.6 - - 9.1 0.1
HCM Lane LOS C B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM 5:35 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 727 5 3 24 737 24 44
Future Vol, veh/h 727 5 3 24 737 24 44
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - 85 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 790 5 3 26 801 26 48
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 796 795 0 1252 398
Stage 1 - - - - - 793 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 459 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.44 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.52 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 449 822 - 164 601
Stage 1 - - - - - 406 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 603 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 742 742 - 158 601
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 158 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 406 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 579 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 20.7
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 302 - - 742 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.245 - - 0.04 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 20.7 - - 10.1 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - - 0.1 -
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM 5:35 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 70 725 26 32 696 82 16 2 36 30 2 83 Future Vol, veh/h 3 70 725 26 32 696 82 16 2 36 30 2 83 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 50 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 76 788 28 35 757 89 17 2 39 33 2 90
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 846 846 0 0 816 0 0 1410 1876 408 1425 1846 423 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 960 960 - 872 872 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 450 916 - 553 974 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver417 787 - - 807 - - 98 71 593 96 74 579 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 276 333 - 312 366 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 558 349 - 485 328 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver750 750 - - 807 - - 72 61 593 78 63 579 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 72 61 - 78 63 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 247 298 - 279 350 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 448 334 - 402 294 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s0.9 0.4 36.7 46.7
HCM LOS E E
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 171 750 - - 807 - - 205
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.343 0.106 - - 0.043 - - 0.61
HCM Control Delay (s) 36.7 10.4 - - 9.7 - - 46.7
HCM Lane LOS E B - - A - - E
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.4 - - 0.1 - - 3.5
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Ashdale St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM 5:35 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 780 10 9 17 799 7 9 0 21 13 0 11
Future Vol, veh/h 5 780 10 9 17 799 7 9 0 21 13 0 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 848 11 10 18 868 8 10 0 23 14 0 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 876 0 0 859 859 0 0 1354 1796 430 1362 1797 438 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 864 864 - 928 928 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 490 932 - 434 869 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 766 - - 409 778 - - 108 79 573 107 79 567 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 315 369 - 288 345 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 529 343 - 570 367 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 766 - - 582 582 - - 101 75 573 98 75 567 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 101 75 - 98 75 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 313 366 - 286 328 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 493 327 - 544 364 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.4 22.4 32.2
HCM LOS C D
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 239 766 - - 582 - - 158
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.136 0.007 - - 0.049 - - 0.165
HCM Control Delay (s) 22.4 9.7 - - 11.5 - - 32.2
HCM Lane LOS C A - - B - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0.2 - - 0.6
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Dale Ave & Standustrial St 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM 5:35 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 11 23 406 587 24
Future Vol, veh/h 10 11 23 406 587 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 12 25 441 638 26
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 922 332 664 0 - 0
Stage 1 651 - - - - -
Stage 2 271 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver269 664 921 - - -
Stage 1 481 - - - - -
Stage 2 750 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver262 664 921 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver371 - - - - -
Stage 1 468 - - - - -
Stage 2 750 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s12.6 0.5 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 921 - 371 664 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - 0.029 0.018 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9 - 15 10.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 0.1 - -
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total AM 5:35 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1137 1075 1 4 4
Future Vol, veh/h 1 1137 1075 1 4 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 1236 1168 1 4 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1169 0 - 0 1665 585
Stage 1 - - - - 1169 -
Stage 2 - - - - 496 -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 324 - - - 141 389
Stage 1 - - - - 190 -
Stage 2 - - - - 527 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 324 - - - 141 389
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 168 -
Stage 1 - - - - 189 -
Stage 2 - - - - 527 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 20.9
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 324 - - - 235
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.037
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.1 - - - 20.9
HCM Lane LOS C - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Rose St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM 5:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 810 16 10 654 26 19
Future Vol, veh/h 810 16 10 654 26 19
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 75 - - 0 50
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 880 17 11 711 28 21
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 897 0 1258 440
Stage 1 - - - - 880 -
Stage 2 - - - - 378 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 753 - 163 565
Stage 1 - - - - 366 -
Stage 2 - - - - 663 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 753 - 159 565
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 159 -
Stage 1 - - - - 366 -
Stage 2 - - - - 647 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 23.7
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 159 565 - - 753 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.178 0.037 - - 0.014 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 32.5 11.6 - - 9.9 0.1
HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.1 - - 0 -
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Court Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM 5:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 859 21 3 44 812 24 37
Future Vol, veh/h 859 21 3 44 812 24 37
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - 85 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 934 23 3 48 883 26 40
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 957 957 0 1490 479
Stage 1 - - - - - 946 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 544 -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.44 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.52 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 354 714 - 115 533
Stage 1 - - - - - 338 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 546 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 664 664 - 106 533
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 106 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 338 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 504 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 30.6
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 206 - - 664 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.322 - - 0.077 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 30.6 - - 10.9 -
HCM Lane LOS D - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - - 0.2 -
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Fern Ave & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM 5:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.3
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 75 810 22 28 778 47 29 3 41 22 1 86 Future Vol, veh/h 13 75 810 22 28 778 47 29 3 41 22 1 86 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 50 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 82 880 24 30 846 51 32 3 45 24 1 93
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 897 897 0 0 904 0 0 1568 2041 452 1566 2028 449 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 1084 1084 - 932 932 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 484 957 - 634 1096 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver387 753 - - 748 - - 75 56 555 75 57 557 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 231 291 - 287 343 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 533 334 - 434 287 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver631 631 - - 748 - - 53 46 555 56 46 557 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 53 46 - 56 46 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 196 247 - 243 329 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 424 321 - 334 243 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s1.1 0.3 103.4 50
HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 106 631 - - 748 - - 192
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.749 0.152 - - 0.041 - - 0.617
HCM Control Delay (s) 103.4 11.7 - - 10 - - 50
HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - - F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 0.5 - - 0.1 - - 3.5
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Ashdale St & Cerritos Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM 5:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 13 844 1 2 794 14 8 0 2 11 1 11
Future Vol, veh/h 6 13 844 1 2 794 14 8 0 2 11 1 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - 100 - - 95 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 14 917 1 2 863 15 9 0 2 12 1 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 878 878 0 0 918 0 0 1396 1842 459 1376 1835 439 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 960 960 - 875 875 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 436 882 - 501 960 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver398 765 - - 739 - - 101 74 549 104 75 566 Stage 1 - - - - - - - 276 333 - 310 365 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 569 362 - 521 333 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver587 587 - - 739 - - 95 71 549 101 72 566 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - 95 71 - 101 72 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - 266 321 - 299 364 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - 554 361 - 500 321 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s0.2 0 39.9 31.2
HCM LOS E D
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 114 587 - - 739 - - 162
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 0.035 - - 0.003 - - 0.154
HCM Control Delay (s) 39.9 11.4 - - 9.9 - - 31.2
HCM Lane LOS E B - - A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.5
HCM 6th TWSC
11: Dale Ave & Standustrial St 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM 5:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 18 11 665 573 7
Future Vol, veh/h 13 18 11 665 573 7
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 100 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 20 12 723 623 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All1013 316 631 0 - 0
Stage 1 627 - - - - -
Stage 2 386 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver235 680 947 - - -
Stage 1 495 - - - - -
Stage 2 656 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver232 680 947 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver358 - - - - -
Stage 1 489 - - - - -
Stage 2 656 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s12.6 0.1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 947 - 358 680 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.039 0.029 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - 15.5 10.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 0.1 - -
HCM 6th TWSC
12: Katella Ave & Court Ave 04/27/2022
Stanton Town Center 2050 Total PM 5:38 pm 04/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBU EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 1243 1115 1 10 7
Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 1243 1115 1 10 7
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #- - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 2 1351 1212 1 11 8
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 886 1213 0 - 0 1759 607
Stage 1 - - - - - 1213 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 546 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64 5.34 - - - 5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32 3.12 - - - 3.82 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver508 308 - - - 126 377
Stage 1 - - - - - 179 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 497 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver353 353 - - - 125 377
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 156 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 178 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 497 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 24.2
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 353 - - - 206
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - - 0.09
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.3 - - - 24.2
HCM Lane LOS C - - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.3
Responses to Comments on Draft Subsequent
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Project
SCH No. 2023110397
Prepared for City of Stanton
Community & Economic Development Department
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, California 90680
Contact: Crystal Landavazo, Community & Economic Development Director
Prepared by Psomas
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 300
Santa Ana, California 92707
Contact: Alia Hokuki, AICP
January 9, 2024
Attachment: E
Click here to return to the agenda.
Table of Contents
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT i
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1.0 Introduction and Summary .............................................................................................. 1‐1
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1
1.2 Proposed Development.......................................................................................... 1-1
2.0 List of Commenters.............................................................................................................. 2‐1
3.0 Responses to Comments.................................................................................................... 3‐1
3.1 State Agencies ............................................................................................................ 3-1
3.2 Regional/Local Agencies .................................................................................... 3-19
4.0 Revisions As Part of The Final Subsequent IS/MND ................................................ 4‐1
4.1 Revisions to the Draft Subsequent IS/MND .................................................. 4-1
4.1.1 Section 4.9, hazards and hazardous materials................................ 4‐1
4.1.2 Section 4.17, Transportation ................................................................... 4‐2 Table of Contents
ii STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
This page intentionally left blank.
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-1
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this document is to present public comments and responses to those comments received on the Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft Subsequent IS/MND) for the Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2023110397). The City of Stanton, as the Lead Agency, has evaluated all substantive comments and has prepared written responses. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 15074[b]), the decision-making body of the Lead Agency must consider the Subsequent IS/MND and comments received before approving the Project. This document, which will be provided to the City Council, as the decision-making body, has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and represents the independent judgment of the Lead Agency.
In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15073, the Draft Subsequent IS/MND was circulated for a 30-day public review and comment period beginning on November 15, 2023 and ending on December 14, 2020. Additionally, the Draft Subsequent IS/MND was available at the City of Stanton website. During the public review period, the City received a total of three comment letters from State and regional/local agencies on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND. Written responses have been prepared to all comments received during the comment period and are included in Section 3.0 of this document.
The Final Subsequent IS/MND consists of three documents: (1) the Draft Subsequent IS/MND; (2) the Technical Appendices; and (3) the Responses to Comments document. The Responses to Comments document includes four sections: Section 1.0, provides the introduction; Section 2.0 provides a list of commenters on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND; Section 3.0 provides responses to environmental comments received on the environmental document; and Section 4.0 includes the revisions to the text of the Draft Subsequent IS/MND.
1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The approximate 156.9-acre Project site is in the northern portion of the City of Stanton, which is generally situated south of the cities of Anaheim and Buena Park, west of Garden Grove, and north of Westminster. The Specific Plan area is generally bounded by Cerritos Avenue to the north, Dale Avenue to the east, Katella Avenue to the south, and Rose Street to the west. Existing land uses surrounding the Specific Plan area include a mix of small commercial centers along Beach Boulevard; single-family and multi-family residential uses to the north; a Southern California Edison (SCE) substation and industrial uses to the east; industrial and commercial uses, including ORCO Block and Hardscape and a shopping center anchored by Food 4 Less, to the south; single- and multi-family residential uses to the west; and Stanton City Hall, Stanton Library, and an Orange County Sheriff Substation to the southwest.
Introduction and Summary
1-2 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
The proposed Town Center Specific Plan is intended to improve, enhance, and supplement the land uses within the Specific Plan area by creating a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly environment. The Project proposes an increase of 139 multi-family dwelling units, excluding accessory dwelling units (ADUs) located on single-family properties. Additionally, with the Project, the Beach Boulevard corridor would be transformed into a mixed-use and pedestrian-friendly community while protecting the existing single-family uses. New gateways are required for corner properties, and opportunities would be created along Beach Boulevard at its intersections with Cerritos Avenue and Katella Avenue to identify the arrival into the Stanton Town Center. The Specific Plan will include policies, guidelines and standards designed to sustain the vision for the Town Center Specific Plan and ensure that future projects stay consistent with the goals and objectives and maintain the intended image for the area.
While the Specific Plan area would increase residential multifamily units, retail/commercial, and light industrial uses through new development and redevelopment, it should be noted that, the Subsequent IS/MND analyzes the potential impacts of the additional 139 multifamily dwelling units only. The existing General Plan for the City of Stanton allows for a total of 1,399 multi-family units within the Town Center Specific Plan area. Since 2008, 4 units have been built, resulting in a remaining capacity of 1,395 multi-family units. The Town Center Specific Plan would allow for an additional 139 units, increasing the remaining capacity to 1,534 multi-family units. The 2008 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzed the potential impacts emanating from development of 1,399 units. As such, only the additional 139 units are the topic of the environmental analysis in the Subsequent IS/MND.
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 2-1
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS
The following is a list of commenters that submitted written comments on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND. The comments included written correspondence. The comments are listed chronologically and numbered. The responses have been prepared to match the bracketing on the comment letters. Each comment letter is followed by responses to address the comments. The comment letters and responses are included in Section 3.0 of this document.
No. Commenter Date of
Correspondence
Page
Number
State Agencies
1 Department of Transportation, District 12 (DOT) December 13, 2023 3-3 2 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) December 14, 2023 3-11 Local and Regional Agencies
3 Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) December 13, 2023 3-21
List of Commenters
2-2 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
This page intentionally left blank.
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-1
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
The City’s responses to comments received on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND are provided below. The responses are numbered to match the bracketing on the comment letter.
Comment letters received are categorized by State agencies and regional/local agencies.
Within each category, the responses are provided chronologically.
3.1 STATE AGENCIES
Two comment letters were received from the State agencies. The comment letters are listed below:
Department of Transportation, District 12 (DOT)—December 13, 2023 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)—December 14, 2023 Responses to Comments
3-2 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
This page intentionally left blank.
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-3
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
3-4 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-5
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
3-6 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-7
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Letter 1: Department of Transportation, District 12
Comment Letter Dated December 13, 2023
DOT-1 The comment reiterates the Project description. No response is required.
DOT-2 The comment regarding the mission of Caltrans for a safe and reliable transportation network is noted. Caltrans is a responsible agency on the Project.
No further response is required.
DOT-3 The comment regarding conducting a queue analysis is noted. Although the traffic study provides a preliminary analysis for the full buildout of the Specific Plan area, the Subsequent IS/MND only analyzes the potential impacts of the additional 139 multifamily dwelling units. The proposed 139 multifamily units are expected to generate 71 peak hour trips. Given the trip distribution, approximately 21 trips would travel to/from the south on Beach Boulevard and not all those trips would necessarily use the interchange at SR-22. Therefore, the study area was limited and does not include Caltrans intersections at this time. When future projects within the Specific Plan area are proposed, further studies may be required, and the Beach Boulevard/SR-22 ramp intersection may be evaluated at that time.
DOT-4 The Project will be consistent with, or seek approval for deviation from, Caltrans Highway Design Manual standards—including ADA standards—for all facilities within State right-of-way, as appropriate. Additionally, the Project will comply with procedures in the Caltrans Project Delivery Procedures manual and will coordinate with Caltrans projects in all stages, including Middle Mile Broadband Initiative and potential relinquishment proposal.
DOT-5 The comment regarding working with local and regional partners on any crossjurisdictional complete streets projects is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. It should be recognized that while the comment pertaining to separated infrastructure such as Class IV bikeways along major streets is noted, and the City appreciates benefits of connecting residents to transit and job centers, incorporating Class IV bikeways along roadways such as Katella Avenue, Beach Boulevard, and Cerritos Street is beyond the scope of the proposed Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Project at this time.
DOT-6 The comment providing resources pertaining to Class IV bikeways, Class I bikeways, bike parking, Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, and network of bicycle infrastructure is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. No further response is required.
DOT-7 The comment regarding incorporating multi-modal (pedestrian, bicycle, and transit) facilities and complete streets, which promote regional connectivity, improve air quality, reduce congestion, promote improved first-/last-mile connections is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers.
Responses to Comments
3-8 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
As discussed in the Transportation section of the Subsequent IS/MND, the Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Project, is planned as a mixed-use neighborhood that blends existing uses with new development, maximizes access to existing transit opportunities, and includes a pedestrian and bicycle transportation network. The Specific Plan also incorporates conceptual future transit opportunities into its design, while ensuring that the success of the multimodal network does not depend on the completion or final details of potential future transit opportunities.
The Stanton Town Center Specific Plan incorporates a “complete streets” approach that prioritizes creation of a true multi-modal transportation system that creates new connections throughout the Specific Plan area. Circulation enhancements are envisioned throughout the Specific Plan area to facilitate multi-modal connectivity and increase pedestrian safety. Design features include, but are not limited to, pavement enhancements such as textured and/or colored concrete or pavers; pedestrian built-out crossings to increase pedestrian visibility; wayfinding signage; new crossings for pedestrians and bicyclists; and short- and long-term bicycle parking.
Additionally, as part of future enhancements, a potential trail is proposed along the existing east-west rail corridor traversing the Specific Plan area. This potential future trail is to connect to another potential trail along the Stanton Storm Channel, which would also provide connectivity to the northeastern portion of the Project site. Court Avenue is also envisioned to include additional pedestrian enhancements, including a future connection across the east-west rail corridor. The pedestrian-focused enhancements along Court Avenue from Katella Avenue to Main Street, will increase connectivity between the southern and northern portions of the Specific Plan Area.
In terms of transit, the Specific Plan area is served by OCTA bus routes. A potential future transit station is identified on the OCTA property located along Beach Boulevard. This transit center could connect users of a potential future light-rail along the former Pacific Electric rail corridor to the multi-modal network within the Specific Plan area.
Lastly, the Stanton Town Center Specific Plan promotes bicycling as a means of mobility. As indicated above, as part of intersection improvements, new crossings are planned for pedestrian and bicyclists. The Specific Plan recognizes the needs of bicycle users and aims to create a safe bicycle network. Thus, considering the proposed enhancements and design guidelines promoting multi-modal circulation, the Project would be in compliance with Caltrans vision.
DOT-8 Please refer to Response DOT-7, above. Considering the availability of public transportation in the area, construction workers and future employees may choose to use transit, as convenient. Also, the comment regarding the benefits of multi-modal transportation in reducing congestion, Vehicle Miles Traveled Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-9
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
(VMT), and improving air quality is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers.
DOT-9 The comment regarding activities (truck parking, ingress and egress, and staging) during construction that could interfere with multi-modal circulation and parking is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. As discussed in the Transportation section of the Subsequent IS/MND, during demolition and construction activities of future projects, provisions would be in place, including but not limited to, staging construction equipment on the site; avoiding blocking the roadways surrounding the Project site; and maintaining fire/emergency access to the site to avoid impacts to existing circulation and parking. Further, to minimize any potential disruptions on the local circulation system and to facilitate the movement of construction traffic, it is assumed that the City would require implementation of a construction management plan, which is provided as regulatory requirement in the Transportation section.
DOT-10 The comment regarding establishing freight pick up and drop off times to avoid congestion is noted. However, it should be recognized that the Project is not proposing any industrial uses that are not already allowed. As such, no additional freight is anticipated in the area that would result in potential conflicts with vehicular traffic and result in congestion. Thus, establishing on-street freight-only parking and delivery times would be speculative.
DOT-11 The comment regarding delivery of packages to future residences and provision of shared drop-off locations, is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. While the City appreciates the efficiency of deliveries, provided that the Project is a Specific Plan, and no development project is proposed at this time, it may be speculative to determine the number of individual packages that will be delivered and/or lockers and shared drop off locations.
DOT-12 Please refer to Response DOT-9, above.
DOT-13 The comment regarding racial equity, inclusion, and diversity is noted and forwarded to the decision makers. While the City is committed to the same values, the request to include a discussion on equity is beyond the scope of a CEQA document. As such, the Subsequent IS/MND is not required and cannot be modified to discuss and/or identify any potential issues pertaining to equity.
DOT-14 The comment regarding requirement for discretionary review and approval by Caltrans and an encroachment permit for any work within Caltrans right-of-way is noted. Future applicants will be aware of the application process in obtaining necessary approval and permits, as appropriate. The requirement for separate permits for utility work is also noted. No further response is required.
DOT-15 The comment regarding coordination with Caltrans for future developments is noted and forwarded to the decision makers. No further response is required.
Responses to Comments
3-10 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
This page intentionally left blank
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-11
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
3-12 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-13
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
3-14 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-15
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Letter 2: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Comment Letter Dated December 14, 2023
DTSC-1 The comment reiterates the Project description. No response is required.
DTSC-2 The comment indicates that the Project may affect multiple sites within the Specific Plan area, as such DTSC requests consideration of their comments. The comment is noted, and responses are provided, below.
DTSC-3 The comment refers to active and nonactive mitigation and clean-up sites within the Project area that may be impacted by the Project. To avoid potential impacts related to health and the environment, the comment adds, construction activities may be restricted within the Project area. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers.
The discussion in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Subsequent IS/MND, under Threshold (d), identifies that The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®: City of Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Project, Katella/Cerritos Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680 (Inquiry Number 6680025.2s), was prepared for the proposed Project by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) (2021). The report was prepared based on a one-mile radius of the Project site and consists of a search of federal, State, local, tribal, and other databases. The discussion discloses that eight Envirostor listings were reported within the onemile radius, three of which are within the Specific Plan area. Additionally, the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database, as provided by EDR, has disclosed that there are 56 LUST sites within an approximately 0.5-mile radius, 6 of which are located within the Specific Plan area.
However, the analysis in the Subsequent IS/MND determined that while development within the Specific Plan area may include redevelopment of one of these reported Envirostor and LUST regulatory properties in the future—no development project is proposed at this time—implementation of the proposed mitigation measure (MM HAZ-1) would ensure that all new development on the said sites involving hazardous materials or waste, prepare a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prior to future actions for land acquisition, demolition, and/or construction. It was concluded that potential impacts would be less than significant with implementation of MM HAZ-1, which is included below:
MM HAZ‐1 A formal Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) shall be prepared for a future project on any of the six Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) sites within the Stanton Town Center Specific Plan area. The Phase I ESA shall be prepared in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E 1527‐05 or the
Responses to Comments
3-16 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), prior to any land acquisition and/or construction activities.
The Phase I ESA shall identify specific Recognized
Environmental Conditions (RECs), which may require further sampling/remedial activities by a qualified hazardous
materials consultant with Phase II/site characterization and remedial experience prior to land acquisition, demolition, and/or construction.
DTSC-4 The comment indicates that DTSC cannot determine all locations within the Project area with documented contamination, land use restrictions, or if included on a list of hazardous materials sites. DTSC requests additional information on sites that may fall under DTSC’s oversight within the Project area. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers.
As discussed above and included in Appendix B of the Subsequent IS/MND, The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck (2021) prepared for the proposed Project, includes search parameters based on a one-mile radius of the Project site and consists of a search of federal, State, local, tribal, and other databases.
The complete list of databases and additional information regarding the identified sites can be found in Appendix C of the Subsequent IS/MND. Three of the eight Envirostor listings are within the Project area. Those three locations are included in the Subsequent IS/MND and provided below. An updated search of the EnviroStor database, using the “City of Stanton” Project area, was conducted, and additional information to the three locations is hereby incorporated on page 4-64 (Threshold “d”), in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Subsequent IS/MND (deleted text is shown in red strikethrough while new text is shown in red italics):
All Metals Processing (ESTOR/EPA ID 30340041)/ All Metals Processing Co. of Orange Co. (ESTOR/EPA ID 71002315), 8401 Standustrial Street/Avenue. The Program Type is Historical and Tiered Permit. The Status is “Refer: Other Agency” and “Active.” Last reported activities listed in the EDR Report include a Supplemental Site Investigation Workplan on November 3, 2020, and a
Monitoring Report on March 8, 2021. The EDR Report also indicates that a Corrective Measures Study Report, Remedial Action Completion Plan, and a Remedy Selection and Statement of Basis are due in 2023. Additionally, the EDR Report identifies that a Land Use Restriction document is due in 2024.
Dichem Dresser/Calla Chemical (ESTOR/EPA ID 30280009), 8100 Electric Avenue. The Program Type is Tiered Permit. The Status is unknown and references “Refer: Other Agency”.
Quicksand (ESTOR/EPA ID 70000085), 8358 Standustrial Street. The Program Type is Voluntary Cleanup. The Status is “Aactive.” Last Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-17
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
reported activity in the EDR report is a Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study on March 29, 2021. A Site Characterization Report was due in 2021, but no additional information about this characterization report is provided in the EDR Report.
Further, the following EnviroStor listing was identified within 0.765 mile from the Project area. The additional listing is hereby incorporated on page 4-65 (Threshold “d”), in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Subsequent IS/MND (deleted text is shown in red strikethrough while new text is shown in red italics):
Basic Electronics, Inc. (ESTOR/EPA ID 71002748), 11762 Wester Avenue O. The Program Type is Tiered Permit. The Status is “No Further Action.”
The above revisions do not require recirculation of the Subsequent IS/MND under CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5(c)(4).
Additionally, the LUST database, as provided by EDR, disclosed that 56 LUST sites exist within approximately 0.5 mile of the Project area, six of which are within the Project area. The six sites are included in the IS/MND and provided below:
Santa Ana Regional W, 10632 Beach Blvd. Status is Open – Site Assessment. Facility Status is Preliminary Site Assessment Underway
California Shipping, 8151 Electric Avenue. Status is Complete- Case Closed. Facility Status is Pollution Characterization
California Comfort V, 8130 Electric Avenue. Status is Complete- Case Closed. Facility Status is Pollution Characterization
Abel Concrete, 8251 Katella Avenue. Status is Complete – Case Closed. Facility Status is Preliminary Site Assessment Underway G&M Oil Co #50; 10961 Beach Blvd. Status is Open- Site Assessment. G&M Oil #50, 10961 Beach Blvd. Facility Status is Pollution Characterization.
Considering no specific projects nor locations are identified at this time, providing additional information may not be feasible. In the future, when specific projects are proposed, the site-specific Phase I ESAs, as required, would identify the potential issues and whether the site fall under DTSC’s oversight.
DTSC-5 The comment references two sites within the Project area that are undergoing environmental cleanup with DTSC oversight. These two properties, Quicksand and All Metals Processing Company are identified, above. The comment adds Responses to Comments
3-18 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
that due to the conditions of these two properties, they will not be suitable for residential use or any use involving sensitive population even after the cleanup is completed. DTSC requests that the City consult with them upon future redevelopment of these two sites. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers.
As indicate above, no development projects are proposed at this time, but the City concurs that future development on the said properties would need to be considered carefully and coordinated with DTSC to avoid potential impacts to the future sensitive population on these properties.
DTSC-6 The comment regarding potential significant impacts under CEQA and coordination with DTSC is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers.
No further response is required.
DTSC-7 The comment expresses appreciation for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Project. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. No further response is required.
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-19
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
3.2 REGIONAL/LOCAL AGENCIES
One comment letter was received from the local/regional agencies. The comment letter is listed below:
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)—December 13, 2023
Responses to Comments
3-20 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
This page intentionally left blank.
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-21
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Responses to Comments
3-22 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
This page intentionally left blank
Responses to Comments
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 3-23
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
Letter 3: Orange County Transportation Authority
Comment Letter Dated December 13, 2023
OCTA-1 The comment expresses appreciation for having received the Notice of Intent (NOI) for the proposed Project. The comment is noted, and no further response is required.
OCTA-2 The comment indicates that page 4-131 and Exhibit 2-1 of the IS/MND do not identify the additional OCTA bus Route 529 that serves the Project area. The comment is noted, and the discussion is revised for clarification. These revisions do not require recirculation of the Subsequent IS/MND under CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5(c)(4). The following revisions are hereby incorporated on page 4-131 (under Transit), in Section 4.17, Transportation, of the Subsequent IS/MND (deleted text is shown in red strikethrough while new text is shown in red italics):
Transit
The Specific Plan area is served by OCTA Routes 29, and 50, and 529, as depicted on Exhibit 2-1, Opportunities and Challenges. A potential future transit station is identified on the OCTA property located along Beach Boulevard. This transit center could connect users of a potential future light-rail along the former Pacific Electric rail corridor to the multi-modal network within the Specific Plan Area.
However, no revisions are necessary to Exhibit 2-1, Opportunities and Challenges in Section 2.0, Project Location and Environmental Setting, of the Subsequent IS/MND. OCTA Routes 29 and 259 follow the same route throughout the Project site, and as no bus route numbers are identified on Exhibit 2-1, the exhibit correctly reflects all OCTA bus routes.
OCTA-3 The comment requests the above revision to the Draft Town Center Specific Plan. The comment is noted. Please refer to the Town Center Specific Plan.
OCTA-4 The comment encourages communication with OCTA. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. No further response is required.
Responses to Comments
3-24 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
This page intentionally left blank
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 4-1
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
4.0 REVISIONS AS PART OF THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT
IS/MND
Revisions have been made to the Draft Subsequent IS/MND based on input received during the public review period and while preparing the responses to comments on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND. The revisions requested do not reflect a substantial change to the Project description, nor would any of the changes result in a new impact or intensification of an impact already identified in the Draft Subsequent IS/MND. The changes are not in response to comments that raise significant environmental issues. Additions to the Draft Subsequent IS/MND are shown in red italicized text and deletions are shown in red strikethrough text.
4.1 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
4.1.1 SECTION 4.9, HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
In response to DTSC comment letter pertaining to hazardous materials sites and an updated search of the EnviroStor database, using the “City of Stanton” Project area, was conducted, and the following additional information is hereby incorporated on page 4-64 (Threshold “d”), in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Subsequent IS/MND (deleted text is shown in red strikethrough while new text is shown in red italics):
All Metals Processing (ESTOR/EPA ID 30340041)/ All Metals Processing Co. of Orange Co. (ESTOR/EPA ID 71002315), 8401 Standustrial Street/Avenue.
The Program Type is Historical and Tiered Permit. The Status is “Refer: Other Agency” and “Active.” Last reported activities listed in the EDR Report include a Supplemental Site Investigation Workplan on November 3, 2020, and a Monitoring Report on March 8, 2021. The EDR Report also indicates that a Corrective Measures Study Report, Remedial Action Completion Plan, and a Remedy Selection and Statement of Basis are due in 2023.
Additionally, the EDR Report identifies that a Land Use Restriction document is due in 2024.
Dichem Dresser/Calla Chemical (ESTOR/EPA ID 30280009), 8100 Electric Avenue. The Program Type is Tiered Permit. The Status is unknown and references “Refer: Other Agency”.
Quicksand (ESTOR/EPA ID 70000085), 8358 Standustrial Street. The Program Type is Voluntary Cleanup. The Status is “Aactive.” Last reported activity in the EDR report is a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study on March 29, 2021. A Site Characterization Report was due in 2021, but no additional information about this characterization report is provided in the EDR Report.
Further, the following EnviroStor listing was identified within 0.765 mile from the Project area. The additional listing is hereby incorporated on page 4-65 (Threshold “d”), in Section Revisions to the Draft Subsequent IS/MND
4-2 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SUBSEQUENT IS/MND
4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Subsequent IS/MND (deleted text is shown in red strikethrough while new text is shown in red italics):
Basic Electronics, Inc. (ESTOR/EPA ID 71002748), 11762 Wester Avenue O.
The Program Type is Tiered Permit. The Status is “No Further Action.”
4.1.2 SECTION 4.17, TRANSPORTATION
In response to OCTA comment letter pertaining to OCTA bus Route 529, the following revisions are hereby made to the text of the Subsequent IS/MND under Transit, on page 4- 131 of Section 4.17, Transportation, of the Subsequent IS/MND (deleted text is shown in red strikethrough while new text is shown in red italics):
Transit
The Specific Plan area is served by OCTA Routes 29, and 50, and 529, as depicted on Exhibit 2-1, Opportunities and Challenges. A potential future transit station is identified on the OCTA property located along Beach Boulevard. This transit center could connect users of a potential future lightrail along the former Pacific Electric rail corridor to the multi-modal network within the Specific Plan Area.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration to the 2008 General Plan
Environmental Impact Report
Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Project
SCH No. 2023110397
Prepared for City of Stanton
Community & Economic Development Department
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, California 90680
Contact: Crystal Landavazo
Prepared by Psomas
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 300
Santa Ana, California 92707
Contact: Alia Hokuki, AICP
January 9, 2024
Attachment: F
Click here to return to the agenda.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.......................................................................1-1 Introduction............................................................................................................................1-1 Mitigation Monitoring Procedures ................................................................................1-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program........................................................1-1 Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Project................................................................1-2
1.4.1 Project Location......................................................................................................1-2
1.4.2 Project Description Summary ...........................................................................1-2 Table of Contents
ii STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
This page intentionally left blank.
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION
In accordance with the requirements of Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, and as part of its certification of the adequacy of Final Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration to the 2008 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (Final Subsequent MND) for the Stanton Town Center Specific Plan Project (Project), the City Council (Council) of the City of Stanton (City) adopts the following Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The Council adopts this MMRP in its capacity as the lead agency for the Final Subsequent MND in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.), and the City of Stanton Monitoring Requirements.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROCEDURES
The principal purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that the Council-approved mitigation measures and development requirements for the adopted Project are reported and monitored to ensure compliance with the measures’ requirements. In general, City of Stanton, Community & Economic Development Department is responsible for overseeing implementation and completion of the adopted measures. This includes the review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition, unless otherwise noted in the MMRP Table. However, the Council retains overall responsibility for verifying implementation of all adopted mitigation measures.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The MMRP is provided in tabular format to facilitate effective tracking and documentation of the status of mitigation measures and regulatory requirements. The MMRP Table provides the following monitoring information:
• Mitigation Measures. All adopted mitigation measures for the Project from the Final Subsequent IS/MND are included.
• Regulatory Requirements. All adopted regulatory requirements for the Project from the Final Subsequent IS/MND are included.
• Responsible for Implementation. The Project Applicant or designated representative is the responsible party for implementing the mitigation measures and regulatory requirements, unless noted differently.
• Timing of Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Requirements. A time frame is provided for performance of the mitigation measures and regulatory requirements, and the specific action deadline is designed to ensure that impact-related components Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1-2 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
do not proceed without establishing that the mitigation measure or regulatory requirement is implemented.
• Responsibility for Monitoring. The City Department(s) or other public agency(ies) responsible for overseeing the implementation and completion of mitigation measures and regulatory requirements is listed, unless noted differently. • Completion Date. The dates the mitigation measures and regulatory requirements are completed are to be filled in by the approving/verifying authority at a later date.
Upon completion, the MMRP and associated documentation will be kept on file at the City of Stanton, Community & Economic Development Department.
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
1.4.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The approximate 156.9-acre Project site is in the northern portion of the City of Stanton, which is generally situated south of the cities of Anaheim and Buena Park, west of Garden Grove, and north of Westminster. The Specific Plan area is generally bounded by Cerritos Avenue to the north, Dale Avenue to the east, Katella Avenue to the south, and Rose Street to the west.
Regional access to the Specific Plan area is provided primarily by Beach Boulevard (State Route [SR] 39), which runs in a north-south direction through the Specific Plan area, and Katella Avenue, which runs in an east-west direction south of the Specific Plan area. Beach Boulevard provides direct access to SR 22 to the south and SR 91 to the north, and Katella Avenue provides direct access to Interstate 5 (I-5) to the east.
1.4.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
The proposed Town Center Specific Plan, comprised of 156.9 acres, is intended to improve, enhance, and supplement the land uses within the Specific Plan area by creating a mixeduse, pedestrian-friendly environment. The Project proposes an increase of 139 multi-family dwelling units, excluding accessory dwelling units (ADUs) located on single-family properties.
With the Project, the Beach Boulevard corridor would be transformed into a mixed-use and pedestrian-friendly community while protecting the existing single-family uses. New gateways are required for corner properties, and opportunities would be created along Beach Boulevard at its intersections with Cerritos Avenue and Katella Avenue to identify the arrival into the Stanton Town Center. The Specific Plan area would also increase residential multifamily units, retail/commercial, and light industrial uses through new development and redevelopment.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-3
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
AESTHETICS
Regulatory Requirements
RR AES-1 Future projects within the Specific Plan area shall comply with Streetscape Light and Exterior Lighting
guidelines identified in the Town Center Specific Plan.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Design review City Planning Division
and City Public Works
RR AES-2 Future projects within the Specific Plan area shall comply with Section 20.300.080, Outdoor Light and
Glare, of the City of Stanton Municipal Code.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Design review City Planning Division
AIR QUALITY
Regulatory Requirements
RR AIR-1 All construction activities shall be conducted in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District’s Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, for controlling
fugitive dust and avoiding nuisance. Contractor
compliance with Rule 403 requirements shall be
mandated in the contractor’s specifications (SCAQMD
2022).
Project Contractor During construction Building and Safety Division
RR AIR-2 All construction activities shall be conducted in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 402, Nuisance, which states that a project shall not “discharge from any source whatsoever such
quantities of air contaminants or other material which
cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any
considerable number of persons or to the public, or
which endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety
of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or
have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to
business or property” (SCAQMD 2022).
Project Contractor During construction Building and Safety Division
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Regulatory Requirements
RR BIO-1 All future projects within the Town Center Specific Plan area shall comply with the most current adopted
City of Stanton Municipal Codes regarding landscaping
standards and requirements, including but not limited
to, City of Stanton Municipal Code Chapter 12.20,
Street Tree Plan.
Project Applicant/
Developer
During and after
Construction
City Planning Division
and City Public Works
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1-4 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
RR BIO-2 All future projects within the Town Center Specific Plan area shall comply with the Design Guidelines and
Development Standards pertaining to landscaping.
Project Applicant/
Developer
During and after
Construction
City Planning Division
Mitigation Measures
MM BIO-1 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the Community & Economic Development Director or
designee shall verify that the following requirements
for nesting birds and preconstruction survey are
completed:
• The start of site-preparation activities and
subsequent construction activity initiation
shall be scheduled outside of the bird nesting
and breeding season (typically February 15
through August 30). If site-preparation
activities start during the nesting season, a
qualified Biologist shall conduct a nesting bird
survey in potential bird nesting areas within
200 feet of any proposed disturbance. The
survey shall be conducted no more than three
days prior to the start of any ground
disturbance activities.
• If active nests of bird species protected by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and/or
California Fish and Game Code are present in
the impact area or within 200 feet of the impact
area, a no-entry buffer shall be established
around the nest site to minimize potential
impacts to the nest occupants. The size and
duration of this temporary buffer shall be
determined by the qualified Biologist who will
account for the bird species and type of
disturbance proposed.
• Clearing and/or construction activities within
buffer areas shall be postponed or halted until
the nest is complete (e.g., juveniles have
fledged from the nest and there is no evidence
of a second nesting attempt) as determined by
a qualified Biologist.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Prior to the Issuance
of Any Grading
Permits
City Planning Division
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-5
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Regulatory Requirements
RR CUL-1 If human remains are encountered during any Projectrelated ground-disturbing activities, Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code states that no
further disturbance shall occur until the County
Coroner has made a determination of origin and
disposition of the materials pursuant to Section
5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code. The
provisions of Section 15064.5 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines shall
also be followed. The County Coroner must be notified
of the find immediately. If the remains are determined
to be prehistoric, the Coroner shall notify the Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC
will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent
(MLD). With the permission of the landowner or
his/her authorized representative, the MLD may
inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must
complete the inspection within 24 hours of
notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend
scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of
human remains and items associated with Native
American burials. These requirements shall be
included as notes on the contractor specification and
verified by the Community Development Department,
prior to issuance of grading permits. This measure
shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City in consultation with the County Coroner.
Project Applicant/
Developer/
Contractor
During Ground
Disturbing Activities
City Planning Division
Mitigation Measures
MM CUL-1 A qualified archaeologist (the “Project Archaeologist”) that meets the Secretary of Interior Standards (SOI)
shall be retained prior to the start of grading for
Project-related construction. The Project
Archaeologist shall monitor all ground-disturbing
activities within the areas of native soil (i.e., below existing areas of artificial fill from previous
construction). If archaeological or historical resources Project
Archaeologist
Prior to Start of
Grading
City Planning Division
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1-6 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
are encountered during implementation of any phase
of the Project, the Project Archaeologist will be
allowed to temporarily divert or redirect grading or
excavation activities in the vicinity of the find in order to make an evaluation of the find.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Regulatory Requirements
RR GEO-1 The proposed Project shall be constructed in
accordance with the Stanton Building Code, Title 16,
Division 1, Chapter 16.04 (Building Code) of the City’s Municipal Code and any other applicable building
standards.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Design Phase Building and Safety
Division
Mitigation Measures
MM GEO-1 Site specific geotechnical investigations by a Statelicensed geologist and/or civil engineer shall be required for all future projects within the Town Center Specific Plan.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Prior to the Issuance
of a Grading Permit
City Public Works and
Building and Safety
Division
MM GEO-2 In the event paleontological resources are
encountered during construction, ground-disturbing
activity shall cease. A Qualified Paleontologist that
meets the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP)
shall be retained by the Applicant to examine the
materials encountered, assess the nature and extent of
the find, and recommend a course of action to further
investigate and protect or recover and salvage those
resources that have been encountered. Criteria for
discard of specific fossil specimens shall be made
explicit. If a Qualified Paleontologist determines that impacts to a sample containing significant
paleontological resources cannot be avoided by
project planning, then recovery may be applied.
Actions may include recovering a sample of the
fossiliferous material prior to construction;
monitoring work and halting construction if an
important fossil needs to be recovered; and/or
cleaning, identifying, and cataloging specimens for
curation and research purposes. The cost associated
Paleontologist During Construction
and Ground
Disturbing Activities
City Planning Division
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-7
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
with recovery, salvage, and treatment shall be borne
by the Applicant. All recovered and salvaged resources
shall be prepared to the point of identification and
permanent preservation by the Qualified
Paleontologist. Resources shall be identified and
curated into an established accredited professional
repository. The Qualified Paleontologist shall have a
repository agreement in hand prior to initiating
recovery of the resource.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Regulatory Requirements
RR GHG-1 The Project shall be designed in accordance with the applicable Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for
Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (California
Code of Regulations [CCR], Title 24, Part 6). These
standards are updated, nominally every three years, to
incorporate improved energy efficiency technologies
and methods. The Building Manager, or designee shall
ensure compliance prior to the issuance of each
building permit.
Project Applicant Design Phase Building and Safety
Division
RR GHG-2 Projects shall be designed in accordance with the applicable California Green Building Standards
(CALGreen) Code (24 CCR 11). The Building Manager,
or designee shall ensure compliance prior to the
issuance of each building permit.
Project Applicant Design Phase Building and Safety
Division
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1-8 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Mitigation Measures
MM HAZ-1 A formal Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) shall be prepared for a future project on any of the six Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) sites
within the Stanton Town Center Specific Plan area. The
Phase I ESA shall be prepared in accordance with
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
Standard Practice E 1527-05 or the Standards and
Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), prior to
any land acquisition and/or construction activities.
The Phase I ESA shall identify specific Recognized
Environmental Conditions (RECs), which may require
further sampling/remedial activities by a qualified
hazardous materials consultant with Phase II/site
characterization and remedial experience prior to
land acquisition, demolition, and/or construction.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Prior to Any Land
Acquisition and/or
Construction
Activities
City Public Works,
Building and Safety
Division, and Orange
County Environmental
Health
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Regulatory Requirements
RR HWQ-1Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, the
Project Applicant shall demonstrate compliance with
California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges
Associated with Construction Activity by providing a
copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the
State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the
subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste
Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other
proof of filing in a manner meeting the satisfaction of the City’s Department of Public Works. Projects
subject to this requirement shall prepare and
implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) during all phases of construction. A copy of
the current SWPPP shall be kept at the construction
site and be available for State and City review on
request.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of
any Grading or
Building Permits
City Public Works
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-9
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
RR HWQ-2General Waste Discharge Requirements. Prior to
the issuance of any grading or building permits, if
construction dewatering or discharges from other
specific activities (e.g., dewatering from subterranean seepage, potable water system maintenance
discharges, fire hydrant flushing, etc.) are required,
the Project Applicant shall notify the Santa Ana
RWQCB and any discharges into surface waters shall
be conducted in compliance with the Santa Ana
RWQCB’s Order No. R8-2015-0004 (NPDES No.
CAG998001), which includes General Waste Discharge
Requirements (WDRs) for discharges to surface water
that pose an insignificant (de minimis) threat to water quality. The General WDRs include provisions
mandating notification, testing, and reporting of
dewatering and testing-related discharges, and
contain numeric and performance-based effluent
limits depending upon the type of discharge.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of
any Grading or
Building Permits
City Public Works
RR HWQ-3Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to the
issuance of any grading or building permits, the
Project Applicant shall submit for review and approval
by the City’s Public Works Department, a Project
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically
identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that
address Pollutants of Concern. The WQMP shall
comply with the requirements of the Orange County
MS4 Permit, the Orange County Drainage Area
Management Plan (DAMP), Model WQMP, and
Technical Guidance Manual, and the City’s Local
Implementation Plan (LIP), Citywide Urban Runoff
Management Plan (CURMP), Project WQMP
Preparation Guidance Manual, and pertinent
regulations in the Municipal Code.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of
any Grading or
Building Permits
City Public Works
RR HWQ-4Grading and Erosion Control Plans. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the Project Applicant
shall submit for review and approval by the City’s
Public Works Department, the grading and erosion
control plans for the Project in compliance with
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of
Any Grading Permits
City Public Works
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1-10 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
pertinent requirements of the City’s Grading and
Excavation Code, Title 16, Division II, Grading and
Excavation Code of the Stanton Municipal Code.
RR HWQ-5Hydromodification Plan. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit on future project-specific
development, the Project Applicant shall conduct a
feasibility analysis to determine if the proposed
Project-specific development would have the potential
to create hydrologic conditions of concern (HCOC) and
determine exact impacts. The Applicant shall submit a
grading and construction plan that would adhere to
the steps and requirements outlined in the Orange
County Model WQMP and TGD in order to mitigate
potential runoff on downstream natural channels. The
plan shall be submitted and approved by the City’s
Public Works Department.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of
Any Grading Permits
City Public Works
Mitigation Measures
MM HWQ-1Prior to approval of Project tract maps, the Project developer(s) shall coordinate with the City of Stanton
Director of Public Works to determine requirements
necessary to mitigate impacts to drainage
improvements to accommodate storage volumes and
flood protection for existing and future runoff.
Measures shall be included to contain runoff or
mitigate flow rates to equivalent or less than existing conditions for all storm events until such time that
downstream facilities are upgraded to maintain a 100-
year storm event. Proposed projects shall implement
mitigation measures, if required, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Project
Developer(s)
Prior to Approval of
Tract Maps
City Public Works
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-11
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
NOISE
Regulatory Requirements
RR NOI-1 The future projects shall comply with the City of Stanton Municipal Code Chapter 9.28, Noise Control.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Design Phase City Planning Division
Mitigation Measures
MM NOI-1 During active construction phases, the Applicant shall require that all construction contractors for a future
project restrict the operation of construction
equipment to distances where vibration levels would
be less than the vibration “annoyance” and “building
damage” criteria shown in Table 4 26.
Project Applicant/
Developer or
Contractor
During Construction Building and Safety
Division
POPULATION AND HOUSING
Mitigation Measures
MM PH-1 Qualifying residents subject to displacement shall receive relocation assistance in compliance with
California Community Redevelopment Law, State
Relocation law (Government Code Sections 7260
through 7277), and the California Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines
(California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Chapter 6). 1 Project Applicant Design Phase City Planning Division
PUBLIC SERVICES
Regulatory Requirements
Fire Protection
RR PS-1 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a future project, the Project Applicant shall comply with all applicable Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA)
codes, ordinances, and standard conditions including,
but not limited to fire prevention and suppression
measures, water improvement plans, fire hydrants,
automatic fire extinguishing systems, fire access,
access gates, combustible construction, water
availability, and fire sprinkler systems. Compliance
with this regulatory requirement shall be verified by
the Chief Building Official.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of
First Building Permit
Golden State Water
Company and OC Fire
Authority
1 Relocation assistance is applicable to projects where real property is acquired by the Stanton Community and Economic Development Department or by a private party pursuant to an agreement with the Stanton Community and Economic Development Department.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1-12 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
Fire Protection
RR PS-2 Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy or final building permit approval for a future project, the
Project Applicant shall pay the required development
impact fees for fire suppression facilities, as required by Stanton Municipal Code Section 19.18.030.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of
Certificate of
Occupancy or Final
Building Permit
Approval
Building and Safety
Division and OC Fire
Authority
Police Protection
RR PS-3 Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy or final building permit approval for a future project, the
Project Applicant shall pay required development
impact fees for police facilities as required by Stanton Municipal Code Chapter 19.18.030.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of
Certificate of
Occupancy or Final
Building Permit
Approval
Building and Safety
Division
Schools
RR PS-4 The Project Applicant shall pay all applicable
development impact fees in effect at the time of
building permit issuance for a future project, to the
City of Stanton and the relevant school district(s) to
cover additional school services required by the new
development. The applicable development impact fees
would be consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 50.
Project Applicant At the Time of
Issuance of Building
Permit
City Planning Division
and Anaheim Union
High School District,
Magnolia School
District, and Savanna
School District
Parks
RR PS-5 The Project Applicant/Developer shall comply with the Stanton Municipal Code 19.42.090 requirement of
payment of in-lieu fees for park and recreation
purposes to the satisfaction of the Community
Services Department, prior to the issuance of
certificates of occupancy or final building permit
approval for a future project.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Prior to Issuance of
Certificates of
Occupancy or Final
Building Permit
Approval
Community Services
Department and City
Planning Division
Libraries
RR PS-6 Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy or final building permit approval for a future project, the
Project Applicant/Developer shall pay required
library development impact fees as required by
Stanton Municipal Code 19.18.03.
Project Applicant/
Developer
Prior to Issuance of
Certificate of
Occupancy or Final
Building Permit
Approval
Building and Safety
Division
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-13
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
TRANSPORTATION
Regulatory Requirements
RR TRA-1 To ensure impacts to the surrounding street system are kept at a minimum, a Construction Management
Plan shall be developed for a future project, in
coordination with the City of Stanton, prior to
commencement of construction. The Construction
Management Plan shall meet standards established in
the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Device (MUTCD) as well as City of Stanton
requirements.
Project Applicant Prior to
Commencement of
Construction
City Public Works and
Caltrans
TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Mitigation Measures
MM TCR-1 In the event that tribal cultural resources are discovered at the Town Center Specific Plan area, the
handling of the discovered resources shall occur, as
described below. However, it is understood that all
artifacts, with the exception of human remains and
related grave goods or sacred/ceremonial objects,
belong to the property owner. All resources
discovered shall be inventoried and analyzed by the
professional Archaeologist retained for the Project. If any resources of Native American origin are
discovered, all activities in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 50-foot radius) shall stop, and the
project Archaeologist shall notify the property owner
and tribes identified by the NAHC as being affiliated
with the area. A designated Native American observer
from one of the tribes identified by the NAHC as being
affiliated with the area shall be retained to help
analyze the Native American resources for
identification as everyday life and/or religious or
sacred items, cultural affiliation, temporal placement, and function, as deemed possible. The significance of
Native American resources shall be evaluated in
accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and shall consider
the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the
Project Applicant/
Project
Archaeologist/
Native American
Observer
During Ground
Disturbing Activities
City Planning Division
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1-14 STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
affiliated tribes. All items found in association with
Native American human remains shall be considered
grave goods or sacred in origin and subject to special
handling.
Native American resources that are relocated/
reburied at the Specific Plan area would be subject to
a fully executed relocation/reburial agreement with
the assisting Native American tribes or bands. This
shall include measures and provisions to protect the
reburial area from any future impacts. Relocation/
reburial shall not occur until all cataloging and basic recordation have been completed. Native American
resources that cannot be avoided or relocated at the
Project site shall be prepared in a manner for curation at an accredited curation facility in Orange County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79 and makes
the resources available to other archaeologists/
researchers/tribes for further study. The
Archaeologist shall deliver the Native American
resources, including title, to the accredited curation
facility within a reasonable amount of time, along with the fees necessary for permanent curation.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Regulatory Requirements
RR UTL-1 The future projects shall be designed and constructed with water-efficient fixtures and systems, as required
by the CALGreen Code.
Project Applicant Prior to Construction Building and Safety Division
RR UTL-2 The future projects contractors shall recycle, reuse, and/or salvage at least 65 percent of demolition and
construction debris, in accordance with Section 4.408
of the CALGreen Code.
Project Applicant During Demolition
and Construction
Building and Safety
Division
Mitigation Measures
MM UTL-1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for any future development project, the Project Applicant shall
prepare a hydraulic analysis to ensure that proposed
improvements are consistent with build-out of the
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of a
Building Permit
City Public Works and
Building and Safety
Division
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT 1-15
STANTON TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Responsible for
Implementation Timing of Mitigation
Responsibility of
Monitoring
Completion Date
(Signature Required)
Specific Plan using ultimate maximum day demands
plus specific fire flow requirements placed throughout
the Project area. The hydraulic analysis shall be
submitted to the City Public Works Department for
review and approval.
MM UTL-2 Prior to issuance of a wastewater permit for any future development project, the Project Applicant shall pay
applicable connection and/or user fees to City of
Stanton Public Works Department.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of a
Wastewater Permit
City Public Works
MM UTL-3 Prior to issuance of a building permit for any future development project, the Project Applicant shall
prepare a sewer study to determine the adequacy of
the sewer systems for review and approval by the City
Public Works Department.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of a
Building Permit
City Public Works
MM UTL-4 Prior to issuance of a building permit for any future development project, the Project Applicant shall
provide evidence that the Orange County Sanitation
District has sufficient wastewater transmission and
treatment plant capacity to accept sewage flows from
buildings for which building permits are being
requested.
Project Applicant Prior to Issuance of a
Building Permit
City Public Works
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
- High Density Residential
- General Mixed Use
� North Gateway Mixed Use District
� South Gateway Mixed Use District
� Town Center Mixed Use District
- General Commercial
Industrial
Public/Institutional
- Open Space
[::] Stanton City Limit
r--,
.. __ ., Specific Plan Area
(!) N. T.S. I Source: City of Stanton, KTGY Exhibit 2.2 - Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations Attachment: G
Click here to return to the agenda.
(RE) Residential Estate
(RL) Single-Family Estate
(RM) High Density Residential
- (RH) General Mixed Use
(PD) Planned Development
- (CN) Commercial Neighborhood Zone
(!) N. T.S. I Source: City of Stanton, KTGY
11 1,
- (CG) Commercial General Zone
- (BP) Business Park Zone
- (IG) Industrial General Zone
- (05) Open Space/Buffer Zone
- (PR) Parks and Recreation Zone
(Pl) Public Institutional Zone
Stanton Town Center Specific Plan
� General Mixed Use Overlay
�'S.._ """S North Gateway Mixed Use Overlay
✓--� South Gateway Mixed Use Overlay
[::] Stanton City Limit
Exhibit 2.4 - Proposed Zoning Designations
Attachment: H
Click here to return to the agenda.
CITY OF STANTON
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: March 26, 2024
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF EXPIRED COMMERCIAL
CANNABIS CULTIVATION PERMITS AND ISSUANCE OF DELIVERY
PERMITS FOR EXISTING OPERATIONAL COMMERCIAL CANNABIS
RETAIL OUTLETS
REPORT IN BRIEF:
At the December 12, 2023, City Council meeting, after considering a request to extend expired commercial cannabis cultivation permits, the City Council directed staff to research operational commercial cannabis cultivation businesses in the surrounding region, with a focus on timelines to become operational. In addition, staff is proposing City Council consideration of the issuance of delivery permits for existing operational commercial cannabis retail outlets.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. City Council find that these actions are not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment) and even if they were considered a project, they would still be exempt from CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301; and
2. Authorize an extension of up to 36 months with a selected tiered cultivation tax payment schedule for expired commercial cannabis cultivation permits and prepare the necessary supporting Municipal Code amendments; and
3. Authorize staff to re-open the application period specifically for delivery permits to the currently operational retail permit holders in good standing and prepare the necessary supporting Municipal Code amendments.
Item: 11A
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 BACKGROUND:
On November 5, 2019, Ordinance No. 1091 was passed, approved, and adopted by vote of the people of the City of Stanton, establishing a tax on cannabis businesses operating within the City. Subsequently, the Council approved a series of actions supporting the permitting and regulating of commercial cannabis businesses.
The City’s inaugural request for cannabis business applications occurred in 2020. The City received 56 applications across five categories and ultimately issued 13 permits. As defined in the Commercial Cannabis Business Ordinance, the Council applied a meritbased approach to the screening and selection process. Additionally, the City hired HdL Companies to review the permit applications and conduct supplemental background checks to ensure no grounds for denial existed as outlined in Section 5.77.080(C) of the Stanton Municipal Code. The review included an investigation of the following:
• Any previous denial, suspension or revocation of a cannabis, business or professional license or permit by another city, county, state, or other agency; • Any prior conviction for a violent felony as defined by California Penal Code Section 667.5;
• Any prior conviction for a crime involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit, including fraud, forgery, theft or embezzlement;
• Any prior conviction for a felony offense involving the sale, distribution, or possession of a controlled substance, other than cannabis - related offenses; • Any false, misleading, or fraudulent statements or omissions of fact in the applications to the City; and
• Any failure to comply with all applicable state and local laws and regulations, including health, building and safety, zoning and fire requirements and standards.
Table 1. Commercial Cannabis Business Applications and Awards Permit Category Number of Applicants Permits Issued
Cultivation 4 3
Delivery 5 4
Distribution 1 1
Manufacturing 1 1
Retail 45 4
As of November 30, 2023, four of the 13 permits issued were operational, and nine had expired.
3 Table 2. Commercial Cannabis Business Permits Awarded and Operational Status
Category Permittee Operational Expired
Cultivation Culture Stanton Growers X
Cultivation Pure Stanton X
Cultivation Stanton Fresh Farms X
Delivery Club Nirvana X
Delivery Dyrect X
Delivery Indo Cali X
Delivery Stanton Sage Holding X
Distribution Corktown Life X
Manufacturing Pure Stanton X
Retail Catalyst X
Retail Culture X
Retail Haven 5 X
Retail Kannabis Works X
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
At its meeting of December 12, 2023, the Council received a staff report titled “Consideration of Extension of Expired Commercial Cannabis Permits” (Attachment A).
The staff report stated that none of the three cultivation permittees were operational by the November 2023 deadline. Prior to the November 2023 deadline, each of the three permittees requested an extension. Based upon the City’s Municipal Code, the City Manager denied the extension request administratively. After considering the extension requests and reviewing the timeline of activities, the Council directed staff to conduct additional research to be brought back to the Council at a future date.
ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS CULTIVATION PERMIT EXTENSION
Research Results
Staff initiated their research by visiting the Department of Cannabis Control California and identified a regional list of commercial cannabis cultivation businesses. The cities these businesses were located in were:
Baldwin Park Bellflower Commerce
Cudahy El Monte Long Beach
Lynwood Montebello Santa Ana
4 Staff reached out to staff members in the Planning Department of each of the aforementioned cities, but unfortunately did not receive consistent data that could be used to identify patterns or trends regarding delays related to commercial cannabis cultivation businesses. Following is the initial email request which was followed up with phone calls.
The City of Stanton is conducting research in response to a request made by a couple of prospective cannabis cultivation businesses. Seeing as the City of __________ has permitted at least one small indoor (commercial) cannabis cultivation business that has an active license with the State’s Department of Cannabis Control (i.e., __________), the City of Stanton would like to request your assistance in retrieving the following information:
• Process for cannabis cultivation business approval. What was the order of permits and agreements that the businesses obtained prior to opening? • Experience with cannabis cultivation business approval. Did the cannabis cultivation business approval & development process encounter unexpected delays (lasting longer than a month)? If so, what caused those delays? How long was the process from the competitive permit award date to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy?
• Basic details about cannabis cultivation businesses. Did the cannabis cultivation businesses have to make site improvements (e.g., electrical upgrades) to their locations? What is the (taxed) square footage of each of their cultivation operations in the city?
Any information that you are able to provide on these points would be greatly appreciated. Please let me know if you need any clarifications.
Following are summaries of some of the responses received. • Some cities were unable to provide the staff resources or source documents to recreate the planning/construction timeline from issuance of a permit to operational status.
• Multiple cities did not respond to staff’s requests for information after repeated attempts via email and phone messages.
• The City of Long Beach was the most helpful and responsive. Long Beach staff shared that electrical requirements were a common hurdle for most cultivation permittees.
Cultivation Tax
On November 5, 2019, Stanton voters passed Measure A, establishing a tax on cannabis business operations within the City. The passing of this ballot measure subjects cannabis business to the tax rates listed below based on classifications. 5 Table 3. Commercial Cannabis Tax Rates
Category Tax Basis Annual Tax Rate
Cultivation Square Footage $12.58 per square
foot (adjusted
annually for CPI)
Distribution Gross Receipts 3.0%
Manufacturing Gross Receipts 4.0%
Retail Gross Receipts 6.0%
Testing Gross Receipts 2.5%
Culture (Cultivation)
The following table documents the cultivation tax Culture would have to submit to the City if they were currently operational based on their proposed plans.
Table 4. Estimated Cultivation Tax for Culture
Sq. Ft. Tax Rate Annual
Amount
Vegetation Room 1,935 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $24,342.30 Room 1 1,600 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $20,128.00
Room 2 1,600 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $20,128.00
Room 3 1,920 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $24,153.60
Room 4 2,112 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $26,568.96
TOTAL $115,320.86
Stanton Fresh Farms (Cultivation)
The following table documents the cultivation tax Stanton Fresh Farms would have to submit to the City if they were currently operational based on their proposed plans.
Table 5. Estimated Cultivation Tax for Stanton Fresh Farms Sq. Ft. Tax Rate Annual
Amount
Room 1 1,668 sq. ft. $12.58 per square foot $20,983.44
Room 2 1,920 sq. ft. $12.58 per square foot $24,153.60
Room 3 1,920 sq. ft. $12.58 per square foot $24,153.60
TOTAL $69,290.64
6 Extension with Tiered Cultivation Tax
During its December 12, 2023, meeting, the Council contemplated approving extensions to the expired cultivation permits with the payment of cultivation taxes that would have been received by the City had the businesses been operational by the November 2023 deadline. Based on discussions with Culture, their estimated timeline to operational status ranges from 18 months to 36 months dependent upon services required from Southern California Edison.
Following are three options for the Council’s consideration. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee’s canopy size built will be compared to the canopy size utilized in the following calculations. If the canopy size is greater than estimated in this report, the permittee will be required to pay the difference in cultivation tax for the entire construction period prior to receiving the Certificate of Occupancy.
Option 1 – Full Taxes Collected During Construction and Ramp Up TOTAL COLLECTED OVER 36 MONTHS: $553,834.50
Sq. Ft. Tax Rate Quarterly
Amount
Annual
Amount
Culture 9,167 $12.58 per sf $28,830.21 $115,320.86
Stanton Fresh Farms 5,508 $12.58 per sf $17,322.66 $69,290.64 Option 2 – Tiered Taxes (50%/100%) Collected During Construction and Ramp Up TOTAL COLLECTED OVER 36 MONTHS: $415,375.80
Sq. Ft. Tax Rate Quarterly
Amount
Annual
Amount
Months 1 – 18 (50%)
Culture 9,167 $6.29 per sf $14,415.10 $57,660.43
Stanton Fresh Farms 5,508 $6.29 per sf $8,661.33 $34,645.32 Months 19 – 36 (100%)
Culture 9,167 $12.58 per sf $28,830.21 $115,320.86
Stanton Fresh Farms 5,508 $12.58 per sf $17,322.66 $69,290.64 7 Option 3 – Tiered Taxes (33%/66%/100%) Collected During Construction and Ramp Up
TOTAL COLLECTED OVER 36 MONTHS: $367,315.20
Sq. Ft. Tax Rate Quarterly
Amount
Annual
Amount
Months 1 – 12 (33%)
Culture 9,167 $4.15 per sf $9,510.76 $38,043.05
Stanton Fresh Farms 5,508 $4.15 per sf $5,714.55 $22,858.20 Months 13 – 24 (66%)
Culture 9,167 $8.30 per sf $19,021.52 $76,086.10
Stanton Fresh Farms 5,508 $8.30 per sf $11,429.10 $45,716.40 Months 25 – 36 (100%)
Culture 9,167 $12.58 per sf $28,830.21 $115,320.86
Stanton Fresh Farms 5,508 $12.58 per sf $17,322.66 $69,290.64
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS DELIVERY PERMIT ISSUANCE
On-demand delivery of cannabis is when a retailer takes an order from a customer and then sends a courier to deliver that order, similar to the way Door Dash or Uber Eats works. Cannabis industry reports estimate that by 2025, the cannabis delivery industry will grow to about $30 billion.
Although the City issued four delivery permits, none of the permittees were able to become operational within two years by the November 2023 deadline. At this time, the City has an opportunity to benefit from the additional sales tax and cannabis tax (6% for retail sales) that delivery could bring in, while strengthening the fiscal viability of the existing operational local commercial cannabis retail outlets. There is a thriving cannabis delivery market inside and outside of the City, and Stanton businesses are currently missing out on those sales. Costa Mesa currently has no cap on the number of cannabis retailers allowed to operate in the city and has approved 22 permits. Costa Mesa is considering implementing a cap of 30 permits. Santa Ana has a cap of 30 retail permits, while Long Beach has 40.
Projections of delivery sales per retail location, based upon discussions with industry professionals, are as follows:
• Expected orders: ~ 250 per day/ ~7,500 per month
• Average order amount: $55-60
• Average monthly sales: $400,000 - $500,000 per month
• Estimated monthly cannabis tax: $24,000 - $30,000 per month • Estimated new jobs created: 35 (30 drivers, 5 staff)
8 Stanton Municipal Code Chapter 5.77 Commercial Cannabis Businesses memorializes operational requirements surrounding delivery retailers in Section 5.77.180 Specific operating requirements. These include:
• Any person who delivers cannabis to a customer must have in possession a copy of the permit, which must be made available upon request to law enforcement. • Delivery vehicles may not advertise any activity related to cannabis nor may they advertise the name of the permittee.
• All orders to be delivered shall be packaged by the names of the customer. • The permittee shall maintain a current list of all vehicles and devices to be used for delivery of cannabis or cannabis product within the city, which includes the vehicle's make, model, year, license plate number and vehicle identification number. This list shall be available for city inspection upon request. • The permittee shall maintain a current log of all persons who deliver cannabis or cannabis products in the city. This log shall be available for city inspection upon request.
At this time, the Council has the sole and absolute discretion to re-open the application period specifically for delivery permits to any of the currently operational retail permit holders in good standing, meeting all of the requirements outlined in Chapter 5.77 of the Stanton Municipal Code. As stated in Section 5.77.100 Permit – Validity – Expiration, “a commercial cannabis business permit is valid upon issuance and continues in effect until it expires automatically twelve months after the date of its issuance, unless extended or sooner suspended, or revoked under this chapter”. Any currently operational retail permit holder who applies for and is issued a delivery permit would have twelve months from permit issuance to become operational.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended actions.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The proposed actions are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”) because they do not qualify as a “project” under CEQA. Section 15378 explicitly excludes from its definition of “project” the “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.” (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15378(b)(5).) The actions would (1) extend expired commercial cannabis cultivation permits for up to 36 months and include a tiered cultivation tax payment; and (2) re-open the application period specifically for delivery permits to any of the currently operational retail permit holders in good standing. Such actions are considered administrative activities that will not result in a physical change in the environment, and therefore are not subject to CEQA.
9 Even if the actions are considered a “project” subject to CEQA, they are categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1) Existing Facilities.
Class 1 applies to the permitting of existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The proposed actions include extending expired commercial cultivation permits for up to 36 months and reopening the application period for delivery permits to current retail permit holders in good standing. These actions would involve negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Lastly, none of the exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption identified in State CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. There is no potential for cumulative impacts; there are no unusual circumstances that would have a significant impact on the environment; the actions would not negatively impact scenic resources within a duly designated scenic highway; there is no record of hazardous waste and no potential to impact historic resources would occur.
Staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
Public notice for this item was made through the regular agenda process.
STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES ADDRESSED:
Obj. No. 2: Promote a strong local economy.
Obj. No. 5: Provide a high quality of life.
Prepared by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Reviewed by: Crystal Landavazo, Community & Economic Development Director Reviewed by: James J. Wren, Public Safety Services Director Reviewed by: Hong Dao Nguyen, City Attorney
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachment:
A. December 12, 2023, staff report “Consideration of Extension of Expired Commercial Cannabis Permits”
CITY OF STANTON
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: December 12, 2023
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF EXPIRED COMMERCIAL
CANNABIS PERMITS
REPORT IN BRIEF:
At the October 24, 2023, City Council meeting, Mayor Shawver requested that a discussion regarding a review and update of the City’s current cannabis ordinance be agendized for discussion. At the November 14, 2023, City Council meeting, per the discussion, the City Council directed staff to bring back an agenda report focused on the possible extension of recently expired cannabis permits.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and
2. Provide direction to staff regarding the extension of expired commercial cannabis business permits.
BACKGROUND:
In June 2020, Council adopted Ordinance 1100 establishing regulations and zoning standards related to commercial cannabis businesses. From September 14 – October 29, 2020, the City solicited interested businesses, received 56 applications and issued 13 permits.
Category
Applications
Received
Permits
Issued
Cultivation 4 3
Delivery 5 4
Distribution 1 1
Manufacturing 1 1
Retail 45 4
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 In regard to the validity and expiration of the permits, Stanton Municipal Code Section
5.77.100 includes the following:
• A permit is valid upon issuance and continues in effect until it expires automatically 12 months after the date of its issuance, unless extended or sooner suspended, or revoked.
• If a permittee has not opened its business and become operational within 12 months of securing a permit, all rights to the permit shall terminate and shall be forfeited. However, if the permittee can show significant and diligent progress towards opening (e.g., evidence demonstrating substantial funds invested, applications submitted for licenses or permits, etc.), the City Manager may provide one six-month extension to become operational.
• The City may also provide up to one six-month extension of time to become operational if there is an ongoing local emergency or force majeure (e.g., acts of God, war, pandemics, and strikes) that results in substantial delay in processing any of the necessary approvals for the permit.
• The total time of any extension provided shall not exceed a maximum of two years after issuance of the original permit. Failure to receive any extension shall render the permit expired.
• Any permittee that received a permit in November 2021 shall be required to be operational by May 31, 2023. Failure to become operational by May 31, 2023 shall result in the automatic expiration of the permit, except that a permittee may apply for an additional six-month extension due to an ongoing local emergency or force majeure.
As of November 30, 2023, four of the 13 permits issued are operational, and nine have expired.
Category Permittee Operational Expired
Cultivation Culture Stanton Growers X
Cultivation Pure Stanton X
Cultivation Stanton Fresh Farms X
Delivery Club Nirvana X
Delivery Dyrect X
Delivery Indo Cali X
Delivery Stanton Sage Holding X
Distribution Corktown Life X
Manufacturing Pure Stanton X
Retail Catalyst X
Retail Culture X
Retail Haven 5 X
Retail Kannabis Works X
3 ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:
On July 5, 2023, Joseph Adeife of the Law Offices of Joseph Adeife submitted an extension request beyond the November 30, 2023 deadline to the City Manager on behalf of Stanton Fresh Farms (cultivation). Based upon the City’s Municipal Code, the City Manager denied the extension request.
On October 18, 2023, the City received a letter from the Law Offices of Joseph Adeife on behalf of Allen Othman, property owner of 8131 Electric Avenue and 10762 Chestnut Avenue, the building locations for Stanton Fresh Farms (cultivation) and Culture Stanton Growers (cultivation) respectively, requesting a “reasonable” extension beyond the November 30, 2023 deadline.
On October 10, 2023, staff received a request for an extension from Dyrect (delivery) beyond the November 30, 2023 deadline. Based upon the City’s Municipal Code, the extension request was denied.
Timeline of Activities and Requested Extension
Staff has documented the following timelines for each permittee requesting an extension going back to their initial engagement with the City. Staff also reached out to each permittee and requested they provide a realistic extension time frame to be open and operational.
Culture (Cultivation)
The following timeline provides a record of Culture’s activities. Culture responded that they are requesting an additional 36-month extension beyond the November 30, 2023 deadline, out to November 30, 2026. Culture has stated the electrical upgrade wait time is the cause of their request, and that wait time is currently estimated at 24 months. 11/2021 City issues permit.
03/22/2022 Permittee submits plan for plan check. Plan check routed to Building and Planning.
04/26/2022 Plan check completed (corrections required). 06/15/2022 Plan check resubmitted and routed same day to Building and Planning.
07/06/2022 Plan check completed (corrections required). 03/27/2023 Meeting to discuss status of project with property owner and architect. 07/25/2023 Plan check resubmitted.
07/26/2023 Plans routed to Building and Planning.
08/03/2023 Plan check completed and comment letter issued. 09/20/2023 Architect sends email with questions about comment letter items. 09/25/2023 Staff responds to architect’s email.
09/25/2023 Architect sends email with updated plans for preliminary review prior to submitting through portal.
09/26/2023 Staff responds to architect’s email with comments. 4 09/27/2023 Architect states he will update the full set of plans and submit through the portal.
09/27/2023 Staff responds advising architect to submit to the portal in order to expedite review process.
10/05/2023 Plan check resubmitted.
10/05/2023 Plan check invoice for 4th plan check sent to applicant. 10/08/2023 Plan check invoice paid.
10/09/2023 Plans routed for review.
10/25/2023 Architect sends follow-up email regarding the status of plan check. 10/25/2023 Staff informs architect that the plans are still under review.
Stanton Fresh Farms (Cultivation)
The following timeline provides a record of Stanton Fresh Farms’ activities. Stanton Fresh Farms did not respond to staff’s inquiry regarding requested extension. 11/2021 City issues permit.
06/14/2022 Location Verification Application submitted to staff. 06/20/2022 Staff approves location.
07/05/2022 Emails between staff and applicant regarding design questions. 09/26/2022 Plans submitted via email for preliminary review from Planning Division. Staff recommends applicant submit a full set of plans for plan check due to time remaining on permit.
02/20/2023 Applicant requests a meeting with staff to discuss preliminary comments. Staff addresses questions.
03/27/2023 Staff meet with property owner and applicant to discuss design issues.
05/11/2023 Staff emails plan check comments to applicant. 05/15/2023 Staff answers questions regarding plan check comments. 08/28/2023 Applicant and architect are informed that the City still has not received a full set of plans to date.
09/05/2023 Applicant and architect are informed that a Water Quality Management Plan is required for their site.
09/14/2023 Plans are submitted through the portal.
09/19/2023 Plan check invoice is paid and plans are routed to Building and Planning.
10/04/2023 Place check review is completed and a comment letter is issued. 10/04/2023 Architect sends email with questions about comment letter. 10/10/2023 Staff responds to questions.
5 Dyrect (Delivery)
The following timeline provides a record of Dyrect’s activities. Dyrect originally responded that they are requesting an additional 4-month extension beyond the November 30, 2023 deadline, out to March 31, 2024. During a recent site inspection, the Building Inspector identified numerous safety issues, including those related to plumbing and electrical. As a result, the Building Inspector has found the property to be unsafe for employees to occupy during construction.
Recently, Dyrect has stated the costs associated with the required renovation of the current property have made the site no longer viable. They are now inquiring about an extension of the permit and finding an entirely new site. 11/2021 City issues permit.
07/07/2022 Tenant improvement (TI) plans submitted through portal. 08/09/2022 TI plans review completed with comments. Proposed TI work did not match cannabis application.
06/22/2023 Staff meets with applicant about project status and pending items. 06/26/2023 Applicant sends email memorializing meeting items. 06/27/2023 Applicant sends email with questions.
06/27/2023 Staff responds to applicant email.
06/27/2023 Applicant submits preliminary plan to staff via email prior to submitting via the portal.
06/28/2023 Staff informs applicant they may proceed to draft a full set of plans based on preliminary plans.
07/25/2023 Staff reaches out to applicant checking on plan submittal update. 07/26/2023 TI plans submitted through portal and routed same-day for review. 07/27/2023 TI plan check comments return to applicant.
07/31/2023 Applicant submits request regarding ownership restructuring. 08/01/2023 Security plan submitted and routed to Planning. 08/22/2023 Security plan comments return to applicant.
08/23/2023 TI plans resubmitted through portal and routed to Planning and Building.
08/23/2023 Security plan resubmitted and routed to Planning. 09/06/2023 Security plan comments returned to applicant. 09/11/2023 TI plan check comments returned to applicant. 09/11/2023 Security plan resubmitted and routed to Planning. 09/11/2023 Landscaping plan submitted and routed to Planning. 09/14/2023 Security plan approved by Planning.
09/18/2023 TI plans resubmitted and routed for review.
09/21/2023 Landscaping plan comments returned to applicant. 09/25/2023 Landscaping plan resubmitted and routed to Planning. 09/27/2023 TI plans approved by Planning and Building.
09/27/2023 Landscaping plan comments returned to applicant. 09/28/2023 Landscaping plan resubmitted and routed to Planning. 09/28/2023 Landscaping plan approved by Planning.
11/02/2023 Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing plans submitted through portal. 6 Opportunity Costs
On November 5, 2019, Stanton voters passed Measure A, establishing a tax on cannabis business operations within the City. The passing of this ballot measure subjects cannabis business to the tax rates listed below based on classifications.
Category Tax Basis Annual Tax Rate
Cultivation Square Footage $12.58 per square
foot (adjusted
annually for CPI)
Distribution Gross Receipts 3.0%
Manufacturing Gross Receipts 4.0%
Retail Gross Receipts 6.0%
Testing Gross Receipts 2.5%
Culture (Cultivation)
The following table documents the tax Culture would have to submit to the City if they were currently operational.
Sq. Ft. Tax Rate Annual
Amount
Vegetation Room 1,935 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $24,342.30 Room 1 1,600 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $20,128.00
Room 2 1,600 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $20,128.00
Room 3 1,920 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $24,153.60
Room 4 2,112 sq. ft. $12.58 per sq. ft. $26,568.96
TOTAL $115,320.86
Stanton Fresh Farms (Cultivation)
The following table documents the tax Stanton Fresh Farms would have to submit to the City if they were currently operational.
Sq. Ft. Tax Rate Annual
Amount
Room 1 1,668 sq. ft. $12.58 per square foot $20,983.44
Room 2 1,920 sq. ft. $12.58 per square foot $24,153.60
Room 3 1,920 sq. ft. $12.58 per square foot $24,153.60
TOTAL $69,290.64
7 Dyrect (Delivery/Distribution)
The tax for delivery/distribution is 3.0% of gross receipts, or $30,000 for every $1 million in gross receipts. Although there is summary information available from various sources regarding delivery/distribution sales in California, it is very difficult to extrapolate from those high-level numbers what estimated activity in Stanton may look like. As such, staff has not proposed an estimated opportunity cost.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
None, this item is an administrative activity not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly).
LEGAL REVIEW:
None.
STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:
Obj. No. 6: Maintain and promote a responsive, high-quality, and transparent government.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
Public notice for this item was made through the regular agenda process.
Prepared by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
1 CITY OF STANTON
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: March 26, 2024
SUBJECT: SELECTION OF THE CITY’S NEW SEAL AND MOTTO
REPORT IN BRIEF:
The purpose of this report is to review options recommended by the Branding & Messaging ad hoc committee to seek City Council selection of a seal and motto as part of the next phase of the City's branding and messaging project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. City Council declare this project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and
2. Select a seal and motto to move forward with the next phase of the branding and messaging project.
BACKGROUND:
At the City Council meeting of September 28, 2021, Council directed the formation of an ad hoc committee comprised of Council Member Warren and Council Member Taylor to guide staff’s efforts to revitalize the City's brand, including the redesign of the City's logo and motto.
The Council allocated $100,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to support the City's Rebrand & Implementation Project on September 13, 2022, which was later reallocated to the General Fund. Subsequently, on May 9, 2023, the City awarded a contract to HUB for the comprehensive redesign of the City's logo, branding, and messaging.
Item: 11B
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 The scope of work includes the following deliverables:
• Brand Assets: Finalized logo designs and template materials. • City Logo (in various colorways)
o Accompanying logos for City departments
o Document templates (letterhead, forms, etc.)
• City Seal (in various colorways)
• City Tagline
• Style Guide: A comprehensive document illustrating the graphic standards and rules for use of the City logos, colors and typography along with design mockups for key materials and guidance for brand applications.
• Wayfinding Signs
• Inventory of current signs
• Design for signs throughout City to match Style Guide • Strategic Communications Plan: A plan to guide Stanton’s communication and community engagement efforts over the next three years. This plan will include a key messaging platform.
HUB proposed the completion of the City’s branding and messaging project through the following phases:
• Phase 1: Research & Brand Strategy
• Phase 2: Brand Messaging Development
• Phase 3: Development of Visual Brand
• Phase 4: Brand Guidelines & Training
• Phase 5: Brand Roll Out
As we are currently in Phases 2 and 3, staff will present recommendations for the City seal and motto from the ad hoc committee to the Council for selection to move into the next phase.
The City plans to achieve the project’s objectives by employing a clear system with easy-to-follow guides for implementation and establish the City as:
o A trusted, experienced service provider;
o A differentiated community from neighboring cities;
o A great place to live, work, play, and raise a family; and o A city with a strong sense of community pride.
To gather input from all stakeholders, staff held a public workshop on May 10, 2023, and engaged in a series of meetings with the ad hoc committee and the PIO committee, comprised of members from each City department. Over the past nine months, the committees reviewed various iterations of the visual brand and messaging. Based on 3 this feedback, HUB provided six final versions of the logo and two possible mottos. At the recommendation of the ad hoc committee, a community poll was distributed from October 5-17, 2023, for the community to vote for a preferred logo and motto.
Based on the results of the poll, two options for a logo and three options for a motto were presented to the City Council on December 12, 2023. At this meeting, the City Council selected a logo to move forward with and asked that staff return with additional motto options at a future meeting.
ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:
After meeting with the ad hoc committee, staff are presenting the below seal and motto options for selection by the City Council to complete Phase 2 and 3 of the Branding and Messaging project.
Seal Options
Motto Options
Option 1: Together Towards Tomorrow
Option 2: Pride. Progress. Vision.
Staff recommends that the Council select their preferred seal and motto option. Upon selection of the seal and motto, HUB will complete the City style guide and wayfinding sign guide. To implement the final branding strategy, staff will prepare an itemized list for the Council to review and prioritize during the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget workshop. 4 FISCAL IMPACT:
On September 13, 2022, the Council allocated $100,0000 for a City Branding project (Task Code No. 2022-836). There is currently $15,000 available in the budget for the implementation of the City’s branding project. In addition, the City Council will have the opportunity to allocate additional funds during the City’s Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget workshop.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL REVIEW:
None.
STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:
Obj. No. 6: Maintain and promote a responsive, high quality and transparent government.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
Public notice for this item was made through the regular agenda process.
Prepared by: Ashley Cain, Community Services Manager
Reviewed by: Zenia Bobadilla, Community Services Director Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
CITY OF STANTON
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: March 26, 2024
SUBJECT: ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA) FISCAL YEAR 2023
STAFFING FOR ADEQUATE FIRE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
(SAFER) GRANT APPLICATION
REPORT IN BRIEF:
On March 28, 2024, the OCFA Board of Directors will consider authorizing staff to apply for the FY 2023 SAFER Grant on behalf of Fire Stations 7 (San Juan Capistrano), 18 (Trabuco Canyon), 57 (Aliso Viejo), 45 (Rancho Santa Margarita), and 46 (Stanton) for funding of a fourth firefighter/paramedic for each shift. The Council will consider whether they support this action on behalf of the City of Stanton.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. City Council find that these actions are not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment) and even if they were considered a project, they would still be exempt from CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301; and
2. Determine the City of Stanton’s position related to the OCFA SAFER grant application on behalf of Fire Station 46.
BACKGROUND:
Established in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 National Defense Authorization Act, the SAFER Act authorizes grants to local fire departments for the purpose of increasing staffing and deployment capabilities.1
1 Documents, program guidance, and related information regarding the SAFER Grant can be found at
https://www.fema.gov/grants/preparedness/firefighters/safer/documents.
Item: 12A
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 In 2017, the OCFA Board of Directors approved the submission of the SAFER Grant application to fund a fourth firefighter position for the cities of Buena Park, Tustin, and San Clemente (all cash contract cities). OCFA was awarded the grant which provided for three years of funding with a federal and local cost share split of 75% federal and 25% local funds in the first two years, and a 35% federal and 65% local cost share split in the third year. As of FY 2024-25, the fully burdened cost of each position has been phased-in to each of the three cities.
At its February 22, 2024, OCFA Board of Directors meeting, the Board reviewed the Annual Grant Priorities for 2024 and ultimately directed OCFA staff to evaluate Fire Stations 7 (San Juan Capistrano), 18 (Trabuco Canyon), 57 (Aliso Viejo), 45 (Rancho Santa Margarita), and 46 (Stanton) for potential funding of a fourth firefighter/paramedic as part of the FY 2023 SAFER grant application.
The FY 2023 SAFER Grant application period opened on March 11, 2024, with an application submission deadline of April 12, 2024. Notable changes to the grant requirements include no Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirements, no cost share or match, and no position cost limit.
ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:
The OCFA utilizes the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1710 for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments as an industry standard to benchmark against (Attachment A). NFPA 1710 establishes criteria related to the effectiveness and efficiency of emergency operations with a focus on the safety of both the public and fire employees.
The five fire stations under consideration for the FY 2023 SAFER Grant currently staff each shift with three firefighters. OCFA has stated the following regarding adding a fourth firefighter to each shift:
Adding the fourth firefighter/paramedic at the five fire stations would increase effective fire force capabilities that are in line with the NFPA 1710 and increase Advanced Life Support capabilities. In addition, in the event of a structure fire, the occupational safety and health administration (OSHA) requires at least two employees enter the Immediate Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) atmosphere and remain in visual or voice contact with each other at all times. It also requires at least two employees be located outside the IDLH atmosphere, thus the term, “two in/two out”.
If all five fire stations are awarded funding for a fourth firefighter/paramedic post position, this would equate to the addition of 15 firefighter/paramedics to OCFA’s overall staffing (1 firefighter/paramedic x 3 shifts x 5 stations). 3 Cash Contract Cities
Cash Contract cities were not originally part of OCFA because they had their own municipal fire departments. They later negotiated contracts with OCFA and relinquished their municipal departments. There are currently eight Cash Contract cities:
Buena Park San Clemente Seal Beach Tustin
Garden Grove Santa Ana Stanton Westminster
Cash Contract (CC) cities differ from Structural Fire Fund (SFF) cities in that rather than having a fire tax mandated as a portion of their 1% property tax levy they instead pay for fire services by contract with OCFA through payments from their general funds. Cash contract charges are based on OCFA’s annual budget.
City of Stanton Cash Contract Charge
The City’s historical charges and forecasted charges are provided below.
Fiscal Year Charge Total Annual %
Increase
2021-22 $5,133,548 4.57%
2022-23 $5,263,154 2.52%
2023-24 $5,495,105 4.41%
2024-25 $5,748,820 4.62%
2025-26 $6,005,911 4.47%
2026-27 $6,259,726 4.23%
2027-28 $6,416,173 2.50%
Fiscal Commitment Associated with SAFER Grant
If the FY 2023 SAFER Grant is awarded to OCFA, grant funds will cover 100% of the salaries and benefit costs during the three-year period of performance. During the initial three-year period, there is no cost share or match requirement from the cities.
Beginning in Year 4, OCFA will be responsible for the full cost of salaries and benefits, as follows:
Estimated increased costs for four SFF cities: $3,365,885 Estimated increased costs for one CC city (Stanton): $841,471 4 Starting in Year 4 (FY 2028-29), the City of Stanton will be responsible for the full annual costs of $841,471 in addition to the annual charge. A full breakdown of the costs for the additional positions is provided below.
Annual Salary Per
Position
Annual Benefits Per
Position
$168,873 $111,617
Annual Salary Per
Position (x3)
Annual Benefits Per
Position (x3)
$506,619 $334,852 (rounding)
TOTAL for 3 Positions $841,471
City staff discussed with OCFA staff the commitment that the Council would be making by supporting application for the FY 2023 SAFER Grant, if in Year 4 or beyond the City was unable to make its payments without drawing upon reserves. Although the SAFER Grant is silent in regard to what happens after the initial three-year period, OCFA supports the continued provision of a four-person staffing model. There is an opportunity for the Council through the Mayor to make a statement at the Board meeting requesting that OCFA staff commit to working with the City of Stanton to develop future options to stair-step the increased costs starting in Year 4.
OCFA Next Steps
OCFA staff will be taking a report to the March 28, 2024, Board of Directors meeting seeking Board approval to submit an application for the FY 2023 SAFER Grant on behalf of Fire Stations 7 (San Juan Capistrano), 18 (Trabuco Canyon), 57 (Aliso Viejo), 45 (Rancho Santa Margarita), and 46 (Stanton).
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
If the FY 2023 SAFER Grant is awarded to OCFA, grant funds will cover 100% of the salaries and benefit costs during the three-year period of performance. During the initial three-year period, there is no cost share or match requirement from the cities. Starting in Year 4, the City of Stanton will be responsible for the full annual costs of $841,471 in addition to the annual charge.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
None. This item is an administrative activity not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly). 5 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
Public notice for this item was made through the regular agenda process.
STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES ADDRESSED:
Obj. No. 1: Provide a safe community.
Obj. No. 4: Ensure fiscal stability and efficiency in governance.
Prepared by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachment:
A. NFPA Standard 1710
Fire Suppression and Special Operations Provisions
n Career fire department is defined as a department that uses full-time or full-time-equivalent (FTE) station-based personnel immediately available to comprise at least 50% of an initial full alarm assignment
n Company is defined as:
• A group of members under direct supervision
• Trained and equipped to perform assigned tasks
• Organized and identified as engine, ladder, rescue, squad or multi-functional companies
• Arrive on the scene in an apparatus
n EXCEPTION to company arriving on one apparatus:
• Multiple apparatuses are assigned, dispatched and arrive together • Continuously operate together
• Managed by a single company officer
n An initial alarm is personnel, equipment and resources originally dispatched upon notification of a structure fire
n Company Staffing (Crew Size)
• Engine = minimum four on duty
• High volume/geographic restrictions = five minimum on duty • Tactical hazards/dense urban area = six minimum on duty • Truck = minimum four on duty
• High volume/geographic restrictions = five minimum on duty • Tactical hazards/dense urban area = six minimum on duty n Initial Alarm Deployment (number of fire fighters, including officers) • Low hazard = 17 fire fighters
• Medium hazard = 28 fire fighters
• High hazard = 43 fire fighters
n Initial Alarm Deployment (number of fire fighters, including officers) • Low hazard = 17 fire fighters
• Medium hazard = 28 fire fighters
• High hazard = 43 fire fighters
n Key Performance Objectives for Fire Response
• Turnout time ≤ 80 seconds
• First engine arrive on scene ≤ 240 seconds (four minutes) • Second company arrive on scene ≤ 360 seconds (six minutes) • Low and medium hazard: Initial full alarm on scene ≤ 480 sec (eight minutes)
• High hazard/high-rise: Initial full alarm ≤ 610 sec (10 minutes, 10 seconds)
n Fire departments shall set forth criteria for various types of incidents to which they are required/expected to respond. These types of incidents should include the following:
• Natural disaster
• Airport rescue and firefighting
• Acts of terrorism
• Marine rescue and firefighting
• Weapons of Mass Destruction
• Wildland fire sppression services
• Large-scale mass casualty
• Mutual and auto-aid
EMS Provisions
n The Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) shall determine if the fire department will provide BLS and/or ALS first response and/or transport.
n Patient treatment associated with each level of EMS should be determined by the AHJ based on requirements and licensing within each state/province
n Staffing (Crew Size)
• On-duty EMS units shall be staffed with the minimum members necessary for emergency medical care relative to the level of EMS provided by the fire department
• Personnel deployed to ALS emergency responses include:
• A minimum of two members trained at the paramedic level • AND two members trained at the Basic level arriving on scene within the established travel time.
n Key Performance Objectives for EMS Response
• Turnout time ≤ 60 seconds
• First responder arrives with an AED or higher capability ≤ 240 seconds (four minutes)
• ALS unit arrives ≤ 480 sec (eight minutes)
• The eight-minute benchmark for ALS units assumes that a first responder, minimally equipped with an AED, arrived in four minutes n The fire department shall clearly document its role, responsibilities, functions and objectives for the delivery of EMS. EMS operations shall be organized to ensure the fire department’s capability and includes members, equipment and resources to deploy the initial arriving company and additional alarm assignments
Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments NFPA® Standard 1710, 2020 Edition
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.