ORDINANCE NO. 1175
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON AMENDING
THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF STANTON AND STANTON 2.0 LLC FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12331-12435
BEACH BOULEVARD WITHIN THE CITY OF STANTON PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65864 ET SEQ. AND MAKING CEQA FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, in November 2020, Chris Segesman representing Bonanni Development, (“Owner”) filed applications for a Site Plan and Design Review SPDR-807, Planned Development Permit PDP 20-04, and Development Agreement DA 20-03, for the development of a 3.75-acre site (“Project Site”), located at 12331-12435 Beach Boulevard (APN: 131-361-14, 131-361-10, and 131-361-03, consolidated by LLA 20-01; Instrument No. 2021000209655) for a new 321 multi-family residential unit development and associated improvements (“Project” or “Cloud House Development”); and WHEREAS, the Owner proposed to develop the Project Site located in the City, more particularly described in Exhibit “A” to Ordinance No. 1105 and incorporated herein by this reference (“Property”) for the Project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 65864 et seq., the City is authorized to enter into development agreements providing for the development of land under terms and conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, on September 22, 2020, the City of Stanton (“City”) entered into the Development Agreement No. 20-03 with Owner (Instrument No. 2022000194588, incorporated herein by this reference (“Cloud House Development Agreement”), and adopted Ordinance No. 1105. The Development Agreement was assigned to Stanton 2.0 LLC (“Developer”) in or around May 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Cloud House Development Agreement requires the Cloud House Developer to pay the City development impact fees and certain public impact fees concurrently with the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Cloud House Development; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2025, City and Developer entered into a First Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement to enter into an alternative payment schedule for the public benefits and development impact fees required by the Cloud House Development Agreement in acknowledgement of the financial difficulties of the Project during the global pandemic and to ensure that the City received a reasonable rate of return on the outstanding balance to ensure its financial security; and WHEREAS, the May 2026 GKN Aerospace chemical incident in Garden Grove has placed a new and unanticipated financial burden on Developer in order to comply with State law that requires landlord reimbursement of rent to tenants under mandatory evacuation orders; and
Item: 11A
Click here to return to the agenda.
ORDINANCE NO. 1175
WHEREAS, in light of this extraordinary situation, City and Developer now desire to temporarily pause the payment schedule for six months to provide relief to Developer and adopt a new payment schedule while ensuring the City still receives financial security during this period (“Second Amendment”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that by entering into the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement, the City will ensure that the City public benefits fees and development impact fees are timely paid to assist with the orderly growth and quality development on the Property in accordance with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan. Additionally, the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement will ensure the City receives financial security through collection of all outstanding fees from Developer with reasonable interest; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer have reached mutual agreement and desire to voluntarily enter into this Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement to continue development of the Project subject to the conditions and requirements set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Stanton Municipal Code Section 20.510.060, a development agreement may be amended using the same procedure for entering into the agreement and therefore, the Planning Commission is responsible for making a recommendation to the City Council regarding adopting this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of Stanton conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the request to approve the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment upon the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt proposed Ordinance No. 1175; and
WHEREAS, on September 8, 2026, the City Council of the City of Stanton conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the request to approve the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment upon the amendment to the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on September 22, 2026 the City Council of the City of Stanton held a second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1175 and voted to approve the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement; and
ORDINANCE NO. 1175
WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement have undergone review by the City Council at a publicly noticed hearing and have been found to be fair, just, and reasonable, and consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2: The City Council finds that the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement does not, in any way, affect the previously approved Project, and involves only matters related to administrative activities such as the collection of outstanding fees and issuance of certificates of occupancy. Therefore, the City Council finds that the adoption of the Second Amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines sections 5060(c)(2), 5061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5). Additionally, the City Council previous found that the Project was categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, section 15332. The City Council further found that none of the exceptions to the exemptions outlined in State CEQA Guidelines, section 15300.2 applied to the Project.
SECTION 3: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65867.5(b) and Stanton Municipal Code Sections 20.510.050(D) & 20.510.060, and based on the entire record before the City Council, the City Council hereby makes the following findings:
1. Public Benefit: The Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement provides benefit to the City because it ensures that the City will still have the ability to collect the outstanding City Facilities Fees, Beautification Fees, and Development Impact Fees associated with the Cloud House Development Agreement through this contract amendment. The City ensures a financial benefit and security for the improvement of public facilities throughout the City because the outstanding public benefit and impact fee amounts will be assessed interest until the balance is paid in full.
2. General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code Consistency: The Second Amendment to the Cloud House Agreement does not make any changes to the previously approved Project. The Second Amendment solely focuses on ensuring that the City recovers all City Facilities Fees, Beautification Fees, and Development Impact Fees associated with the Cloud House Development Agreement. The Second Amendment ensures financial security for the City and further opportunities for the improvement of public facilities throughout the City, which is consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, programs, and land use designations of the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan, and this Zoning Code. General Plan goals furthered by this Second Amendment include, but are not limited to:
ORDINANCE NO. 1175
• Goal CD – 2.1: Increase the number of public spaces within the city, as well as the quality of existing and new public spaces.
• Goal ICS – 2.1: Provide adequate linear infrastructure to serve new and existing development within the city of Stanton.
• Goal ICS – 4.1: Create and maintain a system of public parks that are accessible to all residents, and provide a range of recreational amenities and opportunities.
3. Compliance with Development Agreement Statute. The Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement complies with the requirements of Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 because the amendment does not alter any previously approved provision of the Project. The Cloud House Development Agreement still provides assurance to the applicant for the development of the Project, while the City will ensure the collection of the City Facilities Fees, Beautification Fees, and Development Impact Fees owed under the Cloud House Development Agreement.
SECTION 4: Pursuant to Stanton Municipal Code Section 20.510.060, a development agreement may be amended using the same procedure for entering into the agreement and therefore, the City Council is the approving body for adopting this Ordinance.
SECTION 5: The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Second Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A", entitled, "Second Amendment to Development Agreement between the City of Stanton and Stanton 2.0 LLC".
SECTION 6: The documents related to this Ordinance are on file and available for public review at Stanton City Hall, 7800 Katella Ave., Stanton, California 90680. The City Clerk is the custodian of these documents.
SECTION 7: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 8: This Ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65868.5, within 10 days following the entering into of the amendment to the Development Agreement, as evidenced by full execution thereof, the City Clerk shall record with the Orange County Recorder a copy of the amendment to the Development Agreement.
ORDINANCE NO. 1175
SECTION 9: The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare and file a Notice of Exemption with the Orange County Clerk within five (5) working days of the approval of the Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 22nd day of September, 2026. ______________________________________
DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________
PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF STANTON )
I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1175 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Stanton, California, held on the 8th day of September, 2026, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 22nd day of September, 2026, by the following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
ORDINANCE NO. 1175
EXHIBIT “A”
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
CITY OF STANTON AND STANTON 2.0 LLC
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
RECORDED AT REQUEST OF
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, California 90680
Attn: City Clerk
Fee Exempt - Gov’t Code §27383
(Space above for Recorder’s Use)
Second Amendment to the
Development Agreement Between
the City of Stanton and Stanton 2.0 LLC
This Second Amendment is entered into by and between the City of Stanton, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and Stanton 2.0 LLC, a California limited liability company (“Owner”) on September 22, 2026 (“Second Amendment”). The City and Owner are sometimes referred to in this Second Amendment as “Party” and “Parties.” Recitals
A. In November 2020, Chris Segesman representing Bonanni Development, (“Owner”) filed applications for a Site Plan and Design Review SPDR-807, Planned Development Permit PDP 20-04, and Development Agreement DA 20-03, for the development of a 3.75-acre site (“Project Site”), located at 12331-12435 Beach Boulevard (APN: 131-361-14, 131-361-10, and 131-361-03, consolidated by LLA 20-01; Instrument No. 2021000209655) for a new 321 multi-family residential unit development and associated improvements (“Project” or “Cloud House Development”).
B. The Owner proposed to develop the Project Site located in the City, more particularly described in Exhibit “A” to Ordinance No. 1105 and incorporated herein by this reference (“Property”) for the Project.
C. Pursuant to California Government Code section 65864 et seq., the City is authorized to enter into development agreements providing for the development of land under terms and conditions set forth therein.
D. On September 22, 2020, the City of Stanton (“City”) entered into the Development Agreement No. 20-03 with Owner (Instrument No. 2022000194588, incorporated herein by this reference (“Cloud House Development Agreement”), and adopted Ordinance No. 1105. The Development Agreement was assigned to Stanton 2.0 LLC (“Developer”) in or around May 2022.
E. On February 25, 2025, City and Owner entered into a First Amendment to the Cloud House Development Agreement to enter into an alternative payment schedule for the public benefits and development impact fees required by the Cloud House Development Agreement in acknowledgement of the financial difficulties of the Project during the global pandemic and to ensure that the City received a reasonable rate of return on the outstanding balance to ensure its financial security.
F. The May 2026 GKN Aerospace chemical incident in Garden Grove has placed a new and unanticipated financial burden on Owner in order to comply with State law that requires landlord reimbursement of rent to tenants under mandatory evacuation orders.
G. In light of this extraordinary situation, City and Owner now desire to temporarily pause the payment schedule for six months to provide relief to Owner and adopt a new payment schedule while ensuring the City still receives financial security during this period.
H. Pursuant to Stanton Municipal Code Section 20.510.060, a development agreement may be amended using the same procedure for entering into the agreement.
This process and procedure has been satisfied.
Terms
The Parties agree to the following terms:
1. Recitals. The recitals included at the beginning of this Second Amendment are true and correct and are made a part of this Second Amendment
2. Amendment. Section 4.3, “Development Impact Fees,” of the Cloud House Development Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows (deletions in strikethrough, and added language double underlined):
“4.3 Development Impact Fees.
4.3.1 Amount of Fee. OWNER shall pay all Development Impact Fees in effect on the Effective Date. As of the Effective Date, the Development Impact Fees are one thousand forty-nine dollars ($1,049) per Unit built in the Project.
4.3.2 Reserved.
4.3.3 Prepayment. In no event shall the prepayment of any Development Impact Fees required hereunder establish a vested right on the part of OWNER or any other owner of the Property or any person or entity with an interest therein to develop the Project or the Property following the expiration, cancellation or termination of the Term of this Agreement. Following the expiration, cancellation or termination of this Agreement, all Development Impact Fees then in effect shall be applicable to the Project and Property notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement and notwithstanding the prepayment of the Development Impact Fees set forth in Exhibit “D”, or any combination thereof.”
4.3.4 Time of Payment for Public Benefits and Development Impact fees.
The fees required pursuant to Subsections 4.2.1, 4.2.2, and 4.3.1 shall begin to be due and payable to CITY twelve (12) months following the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Project (“Payment Start Date”) and shall be fully paid by OWNER to CITY within sixty-six (6066) months following the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Project. By way of example, only, if the certificate of occupancy was issued by CITY on April 1, 2025, then the Payment Start Date would begin on April 1, 2026, and the Total Fees Amount, with interest, shall be fully paid by OWNER to CITY by April 1, 2030.
The total amount of fees owed pursuant to Subsections 4.2.1, 4.2.2, and 4.3.1 equal One Million, Three Hundred Forty Nine Thousand, Seven Hundred and Twenty Nine Dollars ($1,349,729) (the “Total Fees Amount”).
Upon the CITY’s issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the Total Fees Amount shall immediately begin accruing interest at the rate of Two Percent (2%) simple interest, annually, for a term of five sixty-six years months, until the Total Fees Amount and interest is paid in full. The total interest and total payment amount to be paid over the five sixtysix year month term is Sixty Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty Four Dollars and Fifty Six Cents ($69,734.56), resulting in a total payment amount (including interest) of $1,419,463.56. A outlined in the payment schedule reflecting the payments and interest and is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment “1”.
OWNER’s obligation to pay the Total Fees Amount shall not begin until one (1) year after the issuance of certificate of occupancy. Thereafter, OWNER’s payments shall be made in equal, monthly installments via check made payable to “City of Stanton” by the first day of each month. If OWNER is late on any monthly payment, a late fee in the amount of Ten Percent (10%) of the outstanding monthly balance shall be assessed against OWNER on the tenth (10th) day that OWNER is late. A payment shall be considered late if it is not received by the City on the tenth (10th) from when it was due. If a monthly payment is still late after Ten (10) Days, then that shall constitute a breach of the Agreement.
Notwithstanding the above, no portion of the Total Fees Amount shall be required to be paid for the period of July 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026, and payments will be temporarily paused during that period (“Pause Period”). Interest shall continue to accrue during the Pause Period. Payments shall recommence in accordance with this section, starting January 1, 2027.
Additional changes to the payment schedule in Attachment “1” that do not affect the Total Fees Amount and interest to be paid may be approved by OWNER and the City Manager.”
3. New Payment Schedule. The existing payment schedule attached to the Agreement as Attachment “1” via the First Amendment is hereby replaced with the payment schedule attached to this Second Amendment as Attachment “1”.
4. Remaining Terms. All terms, conditions, and other provisions of the Cloud House Development Agreement, including all exhibits, not affected by this Second Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
5. Conflicts. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Second Amendment or other Development Approvals and the changes in this Second Amendment, the provisions in this Second Amendment shall govern.
6. Multiple Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which is deemed an original, but all of which together constitute one and the same instrument.
7. Severability. If any provision of this Second Amendment, or any other document referred to by this Second Amendment is, for any reason, held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, then to the maximum extent permitted by law, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability has no effect on any other provision of this Second Amendment.
8. Cumulative Remedies. All rights and remedies of a Party are cumulative of each other. The exercise of a right or remedy may not prejudice or impair the concurrent exercise of another right or remedy.
9. Representation by Counsel; Equal Construction. In executing this Second Amendment, each Party has been represented by and consulted with counsel of its own choosing. Each Party has carefully read and fully understands this Second Amendment in its entirety. The meaning, intent and legal effect of this Second Amendment have been fully explained to each Party by its respective legal counsel. Each Party represents that it is competent to execute this Second Amendment and that it has executed this Second Amendment free from coercion, duress, or undue influence. Each of the Parties has participated in the review and revision of this Second Amendment and, therefore, neither Party shall be considered the drafting Party for purposes of resolving any alleged ambiguities in this Second Amendment.
The Parties have caused this Second Amendment to be duly executed effective as of the Effective Date first written above.
[Signatures on following page]
SIGNATURE PAGE TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF STANTON AND STANTON 2.0 LLC
STANTON 2.0 LLC,
a California limited liability company
By:
Its:
Date:
and
By:
Its:
Date:
CITY OF STANTON,
a California municipal corporation
By: ____________________________
Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
Date: ____________________________
Attest:
By: ____________________________
Patricia A. Vazquez
City Clerk, MMC
Date: ___________________________
Approved as to form:
By: ____________________________
Best, Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
Date: ____________________________
Attachment 1
Payment Schedule
Payment
Date Status
Beginning
Balance Interest Payment
Principal
Paid Ending Balance
07/01/2026 Paused - No Payment $1,266,152.94 $2,110.25 - - $1,268,263.19 08/01/2026 Paused - No Payment $1,268,263.19 $2,113.77 - - $1,270,376.97 09/01/2026 Paused - No Payment $1,270,376.97 $2,117.29 - - $1,272,494.26 10/01/2026 Paused - No Payment $1,272,494.26 $2,120.82 - - $1,274,615.09 11/01/2026 Paused - No Payment $1,274,615.09 $2,124.36 - - $1,276,739.44 12/01/2026 Paused - No Payment $1,276,739.44 $2,127.90 - - $1,278,867.34 01/01/2027 Payment $1,278,867.34 $2,131.45 $30,168.12 $28,036.67 $1,250,830.67 02/01/2027 Payment $1,250,830.67 $2,084.72 $30,168.12 $28,083.40 $1,222,747.27 03/01/2027 Payment $1,222,747.27 $2,037.91 $30,168.12 $28,130.21 $1,194,617.07 04/01/2027 Payment $1,194,617.07 $1,991.03 $30,168.12 $28,177.09 $1,166,439.98 05/01/2027 Payment $1,166,439.98 $1,944.07 $30,168.12 $28,224.05 $1,138,215.93 06/01/2027 Payment $1,138,215.93 $1,897.03 $30,168.12 $28,271.09 $1,109,944.84 07/01/2027 Payment $1,109,944.84 $1,849.91 $30,168.12 $28,318.21 $1,081,626.63 08/01/2027 Payment $1,081,626.63 $1,802.71 $30,168.12 $28,365.41 $1,053,261.22 09/01/2027 Payment $1,053,261.22 $1,755.44 $30,168.12 $28,412.68 $1,024,848.54 10/01/2027 Payment $1,024,848.54 $1,708.08 $30,168.12 $28,460.04 $996,388.50 11/01/2027 Payment $996,388.50 $1,660.65 $30,168.12 $28,507.47 $967,881.03 12/01/2027 Payment $967,881.03 $1,613.14 $30,168.12 $28,554.98 $939,326.05 01/01/2028 Payment $939,326.05 $1,565.54 $30,168.12 $28,602.57 $910,723.48 02/01/2028 Payment $910,723.48 $1,517.87 $30,168.12 $28,650.24 $882,073.23 03/01/2028 Payment $882,073.23 $1,470.12 $30,168.12 $28,698.00 $853,375.23 04/01/2028 Payment $853,375.23 $1,422.29 $30,168.12 $28,745.83 $824,629.41 05/01/2028 Payment $824,629.41 $1,374.38 $30,168.12 $28,793.74 $795,835.67 06/01/2028 Payment $795,835.67 $1,326.39 $30,168.12 $28,841.72 $766,993.95 07/01/2028 Payment $766,993.95 $1,278.32 $30,168.12 $28,889.79 $738,104.16 08/01/2028 Payment $738,104.16 $1,230.17 $30,168.12 $28,937.94 $709,166.21 09/01/2028 Payment $709,166.21 $1,181.94 $30,168.12 $28,986.17 $680,180.04 10/01/2028 Payment $680,180.04 $1,133.63 $30,168.12 $29,034.48 $651,145.55 11/01/2028 Payment $651,145.55 $1,085.24 $30,168.12 $29,082.87 $622,062.68 12/01/2028 Payment $622,062.68 $1,036.77 $30,168.12 $29,131.35 $592,931.33 01/01/2029 Payment $592,931.33 $988.22 $30,168.12 $29,179.90 $563,751.43 02/01/2029 Payment $563,751.43 $939.59 $30,168.12 $29,228.53 $534,522.90 03/01/2029 Payment $534,522.90 $890.87 $30,168.12 $29,277.25 $505,245.66 04/01/2029 Payment $505,245.66 $842.08 $30,168.12 $29,326.04 $475,919.62 05/01/2029 Payment $475,919.62 $793.20 $30,168.12 $29,374.92 $446,544.70 06/01/2029 Payment $446,544.70 $744.24 $30,168.12 $29,423.88 $417,120.82 07/01/2029 Payment $417,120.82 $695.20 $30,168.12 $29,472.92 $387,647.91 08/01/2029 Payment $387,647.91 $646.08 $30,168.12 $29,522.04 $358,125.87 09/01/2029 Payment $358,125.87 $596.88 $30,168.12 $29,571.24 $328,554.63 10/01/2029 Payment $328,554.63 $547.59 $30,168.12 $29,620.53 $298,934.10 11/01/2029 Payment $298,934.10 $498.22 $30,168.12 $29,669.89 $269,264.21 12/01/2029 Payment $269,264.21 $448.77 $30,168.12 $29,719.34 $239,544.86 01/01/2030 Payment $239,544.86 $399.24 $30,168.12 $29,768.88 $209,775.99 02/01/2030 Payment $209,775.99 $349.63 $30,168.12 $29,818.49 $179,957.50 03/01/2030 Payment $179,957.50 $299.93 $30,168.12 $29,868.19 $150,089.31 04/01/2030 Payment $150,089.31 $250.15 $30,168.12 $29,917.97 $120,171.34 05/01/2030 Payment $120,171.34 $200.29 $30,168.12 $29,967.83 $90,203.51 06/01/2030 Payment $90,203.51 $150.34 $30,168.12 $30,017.78 $60,185.73 07/01/2030 Payment $60,185.73 $100.31 $30,168.12 $30,067.81 $30,117.92 08/01/2030 Payment $30,117.92 $50.20 $30,168.12 $30,117.92 - Total Pause/Resume
Schedule
Total $61,244.23 $1,327,397.17 $1,278,867.34
Payments from 3/1/26 to 6/1/26 $7,717.54 $118,288.60 $110,571.06 Total Including Original Payments $68,961.77 $1,445,685.77 $1,389,438.40 Original Loan Fully Amortized Without
Pause $42,739.20 $1,419,463.20 $1,376,724.00
CITY OF STANTON
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: September 22, 2026
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1176 AMENDING CHAPTER 5.06 OF TITLE 5 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE
GROUNDS AND PROCESS FOR DENIAL, SUSPENSION, OR
REVOCATION OF A BUSINESS LICENSE
REPORT IN BRIEF:
The City Council will consider adopting Ordinance No. 1176, which, if adopted, would amend Chapter 5.06 of Stanton's Municipal Code, updating regulations governing the issuance and revocation of business licenses in the City of Stanton. The goals of the amendment are to clarify the City's requirements for issuance of a business license, strengthen the grounds by which the City may suspend or revoke a business license, and streamline the City’s appeal process.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. City Council find this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c) and 15378(b)(5) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because this action constitutes an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; and
2. Introduce and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 1176, entitled:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 5.06 OF TITLE 5 OF THE STANTON
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE GROUNDS AND PROCESS FOR
DENIAL, SUSPENSION, OR REVOCATION OF A BUSINESS LICENSE"; and
3. Set said ordinance for adoption at the October 13, 2026 regularly scheduled City Council meeting.
Item: 12A
Click here to return to the agenda.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Stanton requires that all businesses operating within the City obtain a business license pursuant to Chapter 5.04 and Chapter 5.06 of the Stanton Municipal Code (“SMC”).
Applicants must file a written application with the City, which may be granted or denied, and the business license may be revoked or suspended by the City for specific behavior defined under the SMC, including criminal behavior. Chapter 5.06 also provides an appeals process to challenge the City’s decision to deny, revoke, or suspend a business license.
In recent years, the City has revisited its business license regulations on several occasions as City staff and the City Council have worked to ensure that the City’s regulations meet the community’s needs.
ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:
The City has recently held a number of hearings to consider the denial or revocation of business licenses in which business owners were operating illegal uses. Such uses included illegal adult-oriented businesses and businesses that engaged in the unlawful sale of nitrous oxide products, flavored tobacco, and/or kratom.
The proposed amendments clarify existing regulations, including that business licenses automatically expire after 12 months, and that businesses must apply to annually renew their license. Moreover, the proposed amendments define specific contents of a business license application. The amendments would also add to the City’s grounds to deny, suspend, or revoke a license, and would require a new “cooling off” period for certain businesses. That means that if a business license has been denied or revoked, the same or substantially the same business cannot locate at that location for three years. The “cooling off” period allows the City to ensure that business locations where illegal activity took place do not become a “hot spot” for repeated activity. However, uses that are not “the same or substantially the same business” would still be permitted at the business location during the three-year period, subject to any other applicable regulations.
The proposed amendments would also streamline the City’s hearing procedures. The proposed amendments would delegate authority to the Assistant City Manager or their designee to enforce the provisions of Chapter 5.06. That means the Assistant City Manager or designee would make the initial decision on whether to deny, suspend or revoke a business license. Appeals under Chapter 5.06 would then be heard by the City Manager or designee. Currently, appeals are automatically heard by an outside hearing officer. It can take months to schedule an outside hearing officer to hear an appeal, and such services are costly. The proposed amendments address those issues by allowing the City Manager or their designee to serve as a hearing officer. The City Manager may also designate an outside hearing officer in their discretion.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The proposed action is not subject to CEQA because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c) and 15378(b)(5), given that it constitutes an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Here, the proposed action solely concerns the regulation of business licenses in the City. Because the proposed action constitutes an administrative activity that will not result in a physical change in the environment, it is therefore not a project subject to CEQA.
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney has reviewed Ordinance No. 1176.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Goal 1. Provide a safe community.
Goal 2. Promote a strong local economy.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
Notifications and advertisement were performed as prescribed by law.
Prepared by: HongDao Nguyen, City Attorney
Reviewed by: Crystal Landavazo, Community & Economic Development Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
ATTACHMENT:
A. Proposed Ordinance No. 1176
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 5.06 OF TITLE 5 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING THE GROUNDS AND PROCESS FOR DENIAL, SUSPENSION, OR
REVOCATION OF A BUSINESS LICENSE
WHEREAS, the City of Stanton (“City”) is authorized under its police powers to ensure that all businesses operating in the City comply with all local, state, and federal laws at all times during the business licensing process; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Municipal Code includes comprehensive regulations on commencing, conducting, carrying on, or engaging in any business in the City, including the requirement of a business license generally; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend certain provisions of Chapter 5.06 of Title 5 of the Stanton Municipal Code to clarify the grounds and process for denial, suspension or revocation of a business license; and
WHEREAS, the City has recently had to deny or revoke business licenses in which business owners were operating illegal uses, including, without limitation, illegal adultoriented businesses, the illegal sale of nitrous oxide products, flavored tobacco, and kratom; and
WHEREAS, once illegal activities are conducted at a business, the business owner has demonstrated that they are causing a public nuisance and offenses against the public good, and the business location has become known for such illegal uses in the community; and
WHEREAS, it is reasonable to have a reasonable “cooling off” period following a business license denial or revocation in which the same or substantially the same business operations are prohibited from operating at the same location so that the stigma of the unlawful business will recede; and
WHEREAS, such reasonable regulation is not a regulatory taking because property owners and businesses within the City have numerous opportunities to establish other legal businesses at the premises and throughout the City in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local law; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to adopting this Ordinance have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION 1: Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
SECTION 2: CEQA. The City Council finds that the proposed action is not subject to CEQA because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c) and 15378(b)(5), given that it constitutes an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Here, the proposed action solely concerns the regulation of business licenses in the City.
Because the proposed action constitutes an administrative activity that will not result in a physical change in the environment, it is therefore not a project subject to CEQA.
SECTION 3: Amending Section 5.06.010 Permits or licenses required. Section
5.06.010 of Chapter 5.06 of Title 5 of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (additional text in underline):
“5.06.010 Permits or licenses required.
A. No person shall engage in, carry on, or conduct in the city any business, trade, calling, profession, exhibition, or vocation without procuring a license therefor issued pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, and no person shall engage in, carry on, or conduct such business at a time other than as authorized in such license. No personal or written demand or notice from the city to persons required to be licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be necessary to incur the penalties provided for in this chapter.
A.B No license shall be issued when the provisions of this chapter or of some other ordinance of the city require a permit to be obtained as a prerequisite to engaging in or conducting such business, until such permit is first applied for and obtained. Any license issued in violation of the provisions of this section or in error shall be void.
B.C No person, association, or organization shall conduct, manage, or carry on such entertainment, concert, exhibition, lecture, or dance, without first obtaining a permit from the council.
C.D It is unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to engage in, conduct, manage or carry on any of the following businesses, practices, professions, or occupations within the city without first having obtained a license from the council. The activities and businesses for which a permit from the council is required are those designated in Section 5.04.080, Sections 5.04.310 through
5.04.340, subsections B through J of Section 5.04.390, Section 5.04.400, and Sections 5.04.410, 5.04.440, 5.04.460, 5.04.500, 5.04.520, 5.04.530, 5.04.540,
5.04.620, and 5.04.630.
E. A license to operate a business shall be effective for 12 months, and an applicant may annually apply to the City for a new license to operate the business, subject to the terms and conditions provided in this chapter.
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
F. Licenses are nontransferable. For purposes of this section, a “license transfer” shall mean a: (1) change in business name; (2) change in business ownership; (3) change of business location; or (4) any combination thereof. For purposes of this section, a “change of ownership” shall mean an occurrence where 50% or more of the controlling interest in the business is transferred to another person. A license transfer and/or any other changes in a business including, but not limited to, changes in type, scope or size, shall require a new business license as provided herein.
G. For purposes of this chapter, “days” shall mean calendar days.
H. As a condition to being issued a license, the applicant shall consent to inspection by city enforcement officer(s), and no person shall obstruct, prevent, or otherwise deny or hinder such inspection during normal operating hours. The inspection shall be limited to those areas of the premises which are available, open and used by the general public or the business membership unless otherwise provided in this Code. The purpose of the inspection is to determine whether the licensed premises are being operated in compliance with the requirements set forth in the license provisions applicable to the premises.
Failure to allow such inspection, or for delaying or obstructing such inspection shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of the license.” SECTION 4: Adding Section 5.06.015 Application Contents. Section 5.06.015 of Chapter 5.06 of Title 5 of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows (additional text in underline):
“5.06.015 Application contents.
A. Before a license is issued to any person, the business applicant shall make written application therefor to the city upon a city-provided form. Such application shall set forth the following:
1. The nature or kind of business, trade, calling, profession, exhibition, or vocation for which the license is required;
2. A description of the proposed business operations;
3. The place where such business, trade, calling, profession, exhibition, or vocation will be carried on or conducted;
4. The name of the owner of the business, trade, calling, profession, exhibition, or vocation;
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
5. Whether the applicant or business entity has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of any crime or misdemeanor or felony offense which directly relates to the operation or conduct of a business of the same or substantially same type as the business for which a license is sought from the city in the three years immediately preceding the date of the business license application;
6. Whether the applicant or the business entity has had revoked any business license or any establishment, owner, or operator license or permit for a business of the same or substantially same type as the business for which a license is sought from the city in the three years immediately preceding the date of the business license application;
7. That the applicant has received all required federal, State, and/or local permits, licenses,
8. That the applicant is signing the application under penalty of perjury, and if issued a license by the city, the applicant shall accept responsibility for the conduct of all its operators, managers, employees, contractors, agents, and representatives; and
9. Any other information that the city chooses to reasonably request, in its sole and absolute discretion.
B. Submission of an application for a license does not authorize the operation of a business. The city will not consider an application until it is deemed complete with all the information that the city may require to evaluate the application.”
SECTION 5: Amending Section 5.06.030 Grounds for denial, suspension, or revocation. Section 5.06.030 of Chapter 5.06 of Title 5 of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (additional text in underline):
“5.06.030 Grounds for denial, suspension, or revocation.
A. The city, as determined by the city’s assistant city manager or designee, shall have grounds to deny the issuance of a business license or suspend or revoke an existing business license when:
1. The building, structure, premises, or the equipment used to conduct the business activity fails to comply with all applicable health, zoning, fire, building and safety laws of the state or city;
2. The business or any of the business activities or operations is prohibited by any local or state law, statute, rule or regulation, or the business is prohibited in the particular location or zone by any law, statute, rule, or regulation; ORDINANCE NO. 1176
3. The applicant has made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the application for the business license or in any report or statement required to be filed with the city;
4. The applicant has failed to verify past conduct, as provided in subsections A and B of Section 5.06.020, or has made any false statement related to such verification;
5. The applicant, his or her business entity, or the business's owner, operator, or manager has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of any crime or misdemeanor or felony offense which directly relates to the operation or conduct of a business of the same or substantially same type as the business for which a license is sought from the city in the three years immediately preceding the date of the business license application; or
6. The applicant, his or her business entity, or the business's owner, operator, or manager has had revoked any business license or any establishment, owner, or operator license or similar permit for a business of the same or substantially same type as the business for which a license is sought from the city in the three years immediately preceding the date of the business license application.
7. The applicant, licensee, or business owner or operator owes to the city any taxes, fees, costs, or fine amounts or penalty amounts related to the business or premises.
8. The applicant or the business owner, operator, manager, employee or agent has obstructed, prevented, or otherwise denied a city enforcement officer from inspecting the business premises as provided in Section 5.06.010 of this code.
9. The applicant has failed to obtain all necessary and required federal, state, county, or local permits, licenses, or other approvals prior to obtaining a cityissued business license.
B. The city, as determined by the city’s assistant city manager or designee, in addition to Subsection A above, shall also have grounds to suspend or revoke a business license when:
1. The applicant, his or her business entity, or the business's owner, operator, or manager has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of any crime or misdemeanor or felony offense which directly relates to the operation or conduct of the business for which the business license was granted by the city;
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
2. At least two verified police reports of a disturbance of the peace, disorderly conduct, or similar violations, or citations or arrests have been made regarding the business within the immediately preceding 12-month period;
3. The applicant, his or her business entity, or the business's owner, operator, or manager is found to have committed a crime involving moral turpitude which is substantially related to the business activity for which the license was issued, including but not limited to crimes involving fraud, deceit, or dishonesty. For purposes of this criteria, a verified complaint(s), code enforcement report(s), police report(s), or other similar evidence may be used as support that a crime was committed; or
4. Any employee, contractor, agent, or representative is found to have committed a crime involving moral turpitude at the business premises that is substantially related to the business activity for which the license was issued, including but not limited to crimes involving fraud, deceit, or dishonesty. For purposes of this criteria, a verified complaint(s), code enforcement report(s), police report(s), or other similar evidence may be used as support that a crime was committed.
5. The licensee or business owner, operator, manager, employee or agent has violated any conditions or restrictions of a conditional use permit or any other permit, license, or entitlement related to the business operation.
6. For purposes of revocation and suspension of a business license or permit, any suspension or revocation shall be retroactive to the date of the originating violation, as determined by the city.
C. For purposes of this chapter, a "nolo contendere" plea shall be deemed a conviction.
D. The city, in its sole and absolute discretion, shall have the authority to determine whether a suspension or revocation is appropriate, in the interest of the public health, welfare, and safety.”
SECTION 6: Amending Section 5.06.040 Appeals from denial of business license.
Section 5.06.040 of Chapter 5.06 of Title 5 of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (additional text in underline, deleted text in strikethrough):
“5.06.040 Appeals from denial or suspension of business license.
A. An applicant, business owner, or operator may appeal the denial or suspension of a business license to a hearing officer the city manager or their designee by filing with the city clerk a notice of appeal within 15 days from the date the notice of denial or suspension was issued. The appeal shall set forth the reasons why the notice of denial or suspension should be overturned and shall also be filed ORDINANCE NO. 1176
with any applicable appeal fee, as adopted via city council resolution. Upon receiving the appeal request, a hearing officer shall be selected using the criteria in Chapter 1.12. The assistant city manager’s or designee’s decision is final unless appealed by the licensee, business owner, or operator within 15 days from the date the notice of revocation was issued. If the city receives a timely appeal, the assistant city manager’s or designee’s decision will be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal hearing, unless the issue prompting the denial or suspension poses an imminent threat to the health or safety of the public, in the assistance city manager’s or designee’s discretion. In such an instance, the decision will take effect immediately and continue in effect unless and until the imminent threat is resolved in the assistant city manager’s or designee’s discretion. The hearing officer city clerk shall set a time and place for hearing the appeal and notify the applicant, business owner, or operator and city. The notice of hearing shall be provided to the applicant, business owner, or operator at least 7 days before the hearing. The hearing shall take place no later than 45 days after the notice of denial or suspension is issued. At the de novo appeal hearing, the city and the applicant, business owner, or business operator may each provide testimony and evidence relating to why the appeal should be affirmed or denied. The formal rules of evidence provided for in any State law are inapplicable to this hearing. Within seven 7 days of the conclusion of the hearing or any continued hearing, the hearing officer city manager or designee shall render a decision affirming or denying the business license denial or suspension, based on whether substantial evidence demonstrates that the grounds set forth in Section 5.06.030 have been met. The applicant, business owner, or business operator shall be given written notice of the hearing officer's city manager’s or designee’s decision by registered mail, and the notice shall state with specificity the reasons for the hearing officer's decision.
B. The action of the hearing officer city manager or designee shall be final and appealable to the Superior Court of the state of California pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5.”
SECTION 7: Amending Section 5.06.060 Business license revocation procedure.
Section 5.06.060 of Title 5 of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (additional text in underline, deleted text in strikethrough):
“5.06.060 Business license revocation procedure.
A. If the city manager assistant city manager or designee determines that there are grounds to revoke a business license, as provided under Section 5.06.030, the city manager assistant city manager or designee may shall provide a notice of revocation to the business owner or operator.
The notice shall state the reasons why the business license is being considered for revocation revoked., and a hearing officer shall be selected using the criteria in Chapter 1.12 to determine whether the business license should be revoked.
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
Within 45 days of a hearing officer being selected, the hearing officer The business owner or operator may appeal the revocation to the city manager or their designee by filing with the city clerk a notice of appeal within 15 days from the date the notice of revocation was issued and paying any applicable appeal fee, as adopted via city council resolution. The assistant city manager’s or designee’s decision is final unless appealed by the licensee, business owner, or operator within 15 days from the date the notice of revocation was issued. If the city receives a timely appeal, the assistant city manager’s or designee’s decision will be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal hearing unless the issue prompting the revocation poses an imminent threat to the health or safety of the public, in the assistant city manager’s or designee’s discretion. In such an instance, the decision will take effect immediately and continue in effect unless and until the imminent threat is resolved in the assistant city manager’s or designee’s discretion. The city clerk shall provide the city and business owner or operator a notice of hearing before the hearing officer city manager or designee, providing the date and time of the revocation appeal hearing. The notice of hearing shall be provided to the business owner or operator at least seven 7 days before the hearing. The hearing shall take place no later than 45 days after the notice of revocation is issued. At the de novo revocation appeal hearing, the city and the business owner or operator may each present evidence supporting why the revocation of the business license should be affirmed or deniedor should not be revoked. The hearing officer city manager or designee shall consider the evidence and decide whether to revoke the business license. The formal rules of evidence provided for in any State law are inapplicable to this hearing. The hearing officer revocation shall not be affirmed or denied revoke the business license if based on whether substantial evidence demonstrates that the criteria in Section 5.06.030 has not been met.
The hearing officer city manager or their designee may revoke the business license if substantial evidence demonstrates that the criteria in Section
5.06.030 has been met. Within 10 days of the conclusion of the hearing or any continued hearing, the hearing officer city manager or designee shall provide a notice of decision to the city and the business owner or operator by registered mail, and shall state with specificity the reasons for the decision. The action of the hearing officer city manager or designee shall be final and appealable to the Superior Court of the state of California pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5.
B. The city's remedies, as provided in this section, are in addition to any other legal, civil, or administrative remedies provided under this code.” SECTION 8: Adding Section 5.06.070 Cool off period following denial or revocation.
Section 5.06.070 of Chapter 5.06 of Title 5 of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows (additional text in underline):
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
“Section 5.06.070 Cool off period following denial or revocation. “If a business location has had a license denied or revoked, a new license to operate the same or substantially the same business use at that business location shall not be issued to any applicant for a period of three years from the date of such denial or revocation.”
SECTION 9: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Stanton hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 10: Effective Date. This Ordinance No. 1176 shall be effective 30 days after its adoption.
SECTION 11: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of the adoption and shall post a Certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 2026. ______________________________________
DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________
PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
___________________________________
HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE NO. 1176
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF STANTON )
I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1176 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Stanton, California, held on the 22nd day of September, 2026, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 13th day of October, 2026, by the following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
CITY OF STANTON
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: September 22, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY EMERGENCY RELOCATION PLAN FOR OCCUPANTS OF 8891 AND 8951 PACIFIC AVENUE IN THE INTEREST
OF PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE
REPORT IN BRIEF:
Recent inspections of the roofing systems at 8891 and 8951 Pacific Avenue identified conditions that raise building-safety concerns. Based on these conditions, the City’s Building Inspector determined that yellow-tagging the buildings was appropriate. While the buildings do not presently require immediate evacuation, the identified conditions may become more significant when the roofing systems are subjected to forecasted heavy rainfall, and staff cannot reasonably guarantee that permanent repairs can be completed before storms begin.
Staff therefore recommends approval of a Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan for the four affected households. The Plan would establish an orderly process for relocating residents beginning on or about October 8, 2026, and would provide temporary housing assistance, reasonable moving and storage expenses, and relocation advisory services consistent with applicable relocation requirements. The proposed action is intended to protect occupant health and safety while providing as much advance notice and assistance as reasonably practicable under the circumstances.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. City Council find that this proposed Project is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(c) (Emergency Projects), which exempts specific actions to prevent or mitigate an emergency. Alternatively, if the proposed action is not statutorily exempt under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(c), it is not considered a “project” subject to CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) (organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and
2. Approve the Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan for the affected occupants of 8891 and 8951 Pacific Avenue; and
Item: 12B
Click here to return to the agenda.
3. Authorize the City Manager to implement the Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan, coordinate with the City's relocation consultant and affected households, execute documents necessary to carry out the Plan, and make non-substantive modifications necessary to administer the Plan, subject to applicable law and available appropriations.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
Prior Interim Measures and Change in Roof Conditions
This month, information came to the City’s attention raising concerns regarding the condition of the roofs at 8891 and 8951 Pacific Avenue. Upon receiving this information, the City promptly requested that its Building Inspector inspect the roofing systems at both properties. Following the inspection, the Building Inspector issued a report dated September 10, 2026. The inspection identified areas of soft roof sheathing, waterrelated deterioration to roof components, evidence of recurring water intrusion and ponding, deteriorated flashing, and areas where components were concealed and the full extent of deterioration therefore could not readily be determined without further investigation.
Yellow-Tag Determination
Based on the conditions observed during the inspection and documented in the September 10 report, the Building Inspector determined that yellow-tagging the buildings was appropriate. A yellow tag means the building is in a condition in which it has moderate damage and could pose a risk to occupants. The present yellow-tag status reflects the conditions existing at this time, and according to the inspection report, does not require the immediate evacuation of the occupants.
Importantly, however, the safety assessment is not static. The significance of existing roof deterioration and water-intrusion conditions may materially change when the roofing systems are subjected to rainfall. Accordingly, the fact that the buildings may remain occupied under present dry-weather conditions does not mean that continued occupancy would remain appropriate if weather conditions materially change.
Rainy Season and Timing Considerations
Following receipt of the Building Inspector's report, staff reviewed available weather and climate information to evaluate the amount of time reasonably available to address the identified conditions.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Prediction Center currently has an El Niño Advisory in effect and, as of its September 10, 2026 update, reports that El Niño is strengthening, with a greater than 90 percent chance of a very strong El Niño event during the Northern Hemisphere fall and winter of 2026-27. While El Niño conditions do not guarantee any particular storm, rainfall amount, or timing, the information reinforces the need for the City to plan conservatively as Southern California moves into its wetter months.
For planning purposes, staff identified early to mid-October as the period by which the affected households should be relocated rather than waiting until a specific rainfall event is imminent. The anticipated October 8, 2026 relocation date is intended to provide the City, its relocation consultant, and the affected households with sufficient time to carry out an orderly relocation process. The City, its consultant and affected residents would not be able to carry out an orderly relocation process if the City waited until a significant rain event that threatened the safety of the residents was forecast.
Feasibility of Completing Permanent Roof Repairs
Staff also considered whether the identified roof conditions could reasonably be repaired quickly enough to avoid relocation. At this time, staff cannot reasonably guarantee that permanent repairs can be completed before the risk of the forecasted storms.
Even under an expedited process, the City would need to sufficiently investigate the existing conditions, determine the appropriate scope of repair, procure and retain a qualified contractor through a bid process, obtain any required permits or approvals, complete the work, address any additional concealed deterioration discovered during construction, and have the completed work inspected.
Need for an Emergency Relocation Process
The proposed Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan is intended to establish a structured process for assisting the four affected households in accordance with applicable federal and state relocation requirements.
Applicable relocation laws provide substantial advance-notice protections to occupants.
Federal regulations generally require at least 90 days' advance written notice before a lawful occupant may be required to move, but recognize that unusual circumstances may make that period impracticable, including where continued occupancy would constitute a substantial danger to health or safety. California relocation law contains separate advance-notice requirements for eligible occupants. Accordingly, the proposed Plan does not waive any applicable notice requirement and will be implemented consistent with the requirements applicable to each affected household.
In implementing the Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan, the City and its relocation consultant will also comply with all applicable requirements of the California Health and Safety Code and California Civil Code.
Staff believe the circumstances described in this report warrant immediate implementation of an emergency relocation process so that relocation assistance and suitable temporary accommodations can be made available to the affected households as soon as practicable. Waiting to begin relocation planning and assistance until the ordinary notice period has elapsed would extend well into the forecasted rainy season.
Approval of the Plan will allow the City and its relocation consultant to begin working immediately with each affected household to facilitate relocation at the earliest time permitted by applicable law. Nothing in the Plan limits the City's ability to take separate action pursuant to applicable building and safety laws should conditions at the properties deteriorate to the point that continued occupancy is determined to be unsafe.
Proposed Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan
The proposed Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan applies to the four affected households at 8891 and 8951 Pacific Avenue.
On September 16, 2026, the City provided written notice to affected occupants advising them of the yellow-tag status of the buildings, the building conditions identified by the City, and the anticipated need to temporarily relocate beginning on or about October 8, 2026. The notice also advised occupants that the City Council would consider the Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan at its September 22, 2026 meeting.
If approved, the Plan would provide a coordinated process through which the City and its relocation consultant would work individually with each household. Temporary relocation assistance may include:
1. Placement in nearby extended-stay accommodations that include kitchen facilities; or
2. An emergency relocation stipend in lieu of City-arranged temporary lodging, in accordance with the procedures established under the Plan.
The Plan would also provide for reasonable moving and storage expenses associated with the temporary relocation, together with relocation advisory services and assistance necessary to help affected households complete the relocation process.
The objective is to complete the relocation through a planned and supported process before changing weather conditions create the potential for a more immediate displacement. Acting in advance allows the City and its relocation consultant to work individually with each household, provide reasonable relocation options and assistance, and address household-specific circumstances that would be more difficult to accommodate if residents were required to vacate on substantially shorter notice.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If approved, implementation of the Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan will result in costs associated with temporary lodging or relocation stipends, reasonable moving and storage expenses, relocation consultant services, and related administrative costs.
The final fiscal impact will depend upon the relocation option selected by each household, the duration of temporary relocation, and household-specific circumstances.
Costs will be paid from the existing budgeted funds (including pending budget carryovers)related to relocation in the City’s Housing Authority Fund. Staff will return to the City Council if additional appropriation authority is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The proposed Project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The proposed Project is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(c) (Emergency Projects), which exempts specific actions to prevent or mitigate an emergency. Here, the proposed Project involves temporary relocation measures necessary to protect the occupants from the loss or damage of life, health, and property in light of the identified roof deterioration and the increased risk posed by those conditions during the anticipated very strong El Niño event and the 2026-27 rainy season.
Alternatively, the proposed action is not subject to CEQA because it does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378. CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) excludes organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.
The proposed action is limited to relocation and related protective measures intended to address presently identified building-safety concerns, and will not result in any physical changes in the environment. Approval of the Plan does not constitute approval of any future permanent rehabilitation, demolition, redevelopment, or other physical project at the properties. Any such future action will be evaluated separately for compliance with CEQA, as applicable. Accordingly, the proposed action is not a “project” subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan and this staff report as to form.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
Notifications were performed through normal agenda process.
On September 16, 2026, written notice was provided to affected occupants of 8891 and 8951 Pacific Avenue regarding the yellow-tag status of the buildings, anticipated temporary relocation, and the City Council's consideration of the Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan on September 22, 2026.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Goal 1. Promote a safe community.
Prepared by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Vivien Avella, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan
B. September 16, 2026 Notice to Affected Occupants
City of Stanton - Emergency Temporary &
Permanent Relocation Assistance Program Plan
This City of Stanton “Relocation Assistance Program” provides emergency temporary housing and permanent relocation assistance to residential occupants displaced by yellow tag roof conditions, in full compliance with 49 CFR Part 24 (URA) and California Relocation Assistance Law (Gov. Code § 7260 et seq.; 25 CCR § 6000 et seq.).
Program Framework & Permanent Relocation Assurances
● Project Scope & Target Population: This formal Emergency Temporary & Permanent Relocation Plan governs the emergency displacement and relocation assistance for 4 residential tenant households comprising 19 total occupants residing in 2-bedroom units across 2 fourplexes (8891 and 8951 Pacific Avenue) due to yellow-tagged roof conditions.
Based on formal tenant assessments, households speak English and Spanish, none are overcrowded, 1 household includes an elderly resident (>62 years), and 2 households include persons with disabilities. All households are anticipated to be low-income under HUD Orange County standards.
● Subject Unit Rents: Due to the displacement by yellow tag roof conditions, tenants are legally excused from paying rent during any period a property is red-tagged or declared uninhabitable.
● Dual Relocation Assistance Eligibility Framework: Displaced residents receive immediate emergency temporary relocation benefits and full eligibility for permanent relocation assistance under URA and California law.
● Permanent Replacement Dwelling Occupancy Requirement: Residents are required to actively locate, secure, and occupy a permanent Decent, Safe & Sanitary (DS&S) replacement dwelling directly from their temporary housing placement. ● Termination of Temporary Benefits: All temporary benefits—including lodging, storage allowances, and other available benefits—immediately cease on the date the resident takes possession and occupies their permanent DS&S replacement dwelling. ● Notices & Multilingual Communication: All formal notices (General Information Notice, Notice of Eligibility, Notice to Vacate) will be issued promptly in plain English and Spanish to reflect household language preferences.
● Hardship & Disability Accommodations: Expedited advance payments for move-in deposits or essential needs will be processed for households facing severe financial hardship. Reasonable accommodations and accessible ground-floor housing units will be provided for households with members with disabilities or seniors.
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
Formal Temporary Emergency Relocation Procedures
1. Temporary Lodging Options
● Lodging Option 1 (City-Provided Hotel): Direct City payment/billing for single room occupancy/hotel accommodations with kitchen facilities (Extended Stay America/Studio 6/Sonesta Suites) arranged by the City or its relocation consultant. ● Lodging Option 2 (Tenant-Selected Lodging): Tenant-selected lodging or an emergency relocation stipend up to $3,000 per month, subject to prior City approval, verification of reservation/occupancy, and a mandatory Decent, Safe & Sanitary (DS&S) inspection.
2. Residential Moving Options
● Professional Move (Full-Service): Professional moving company packs, transports, stores, and unpacks personal belongings from the displacement unit at 8891/8951 Pacific Ave to warehouse/storage and ultimately into the permanent DS&S dwelling. Billed directly to the City.
● Professional Move (Move Only Service): A licensed mover packs and transports personal belongings from the displacement unit to a direct self-storage unit, and subsequently to the permanent DS&S dwelling. Unlike full-service, the resident selects the “Direct Self-Storage” option to maintain access to their belongings throughout the displacement period.
● Fixed Schedule Move (Self-Move): Residents moving independently receive flat-rate payments based on room count per the Fixed Residential Moving Cost Schedule for both stages of the move. Residents are fully responsible for all components of the packing, moving and storage of personal items. Storage cost will be separate from the moving payment.
3. Personal Property Storage Options
● Approval Terms: Approved in 3-month increments based on market rate and volume of personal property.
● Direct Self-Storage: Residents select a commercial self-storage unit, with monthly invoices paid directly by the Project Sponsor, if applicable, or reimbursed to the tenant.
Tenants may access personal storage directly and are responsible for personal items during storage period.
● Professional Warehouse Storage: Professional movers, insure, transport and store packed items in a secure, climate-controlled warehouse facility until permanent housing is occupied. Tenants likely will not have access to personal items during the storage period.
4. Eligible Out-of-Pocket & Incidental Expenses
Expense Category Eligible Coverage & Payment Terms
Pet Accommodations Direct payment for pet-friendly hotel fees, non-refundable pet deposits, or reimbursement for boarding facility costs during temporary displacement. Pre-approval required. Invoice and paid receipt for reimbursement claim process.
Vehicle Mileage Mileage stipend ($0.70/mile) for necessary & reasonable mileage costs due to temporary housing available. Relocation staff to determine necessity per household needs and process claims.
Public Transit Transit allowances or monthly transit passes for non-vehicle household occupants. Relocation staff to determine necessity per household needs and process claims.
Perishable Food Loss Direct reimbursement for spoiled perishable items resulting from emergency evacuation. Relocation staff to determine necessity per household needs and process claims.
Other Reasonable &
Necessary Costs
Relocation staff to determine necessity per household needs and process claims.
Claims and administrative appeals are processed under 25 CCR § 6150 et seq. and URA guidelines.
Permanent Relocation Assistance Program
Tenants displaced due to the yellow tag roof conditions will become immediately eligible for full permanent relocation assistance in compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (49 CFR Part 24) and California Relocation Assistance Law (Gov. Code § 7260 et seq.; 25 CCR § 6000 et seq.).
1. Replacement Housing Payments (RHP) & Calculation Methodology ● 42-Month Rental Assistance Eligibility: Eligible displaced tenant households receive rental assistance calculated over a 42-month period based on the cost of comparable Decent, Safe & Sanitary (DS&S) replacement housing.
● Standard Benefit Cap & Payment Formula: Under standard URA guidelines, rental assistance payments are capped at $9,570 unless Last Resort Housing provisions apply.
The payment is calculated as 42 times the monthly rental differential:
Monthly Differential = (Lesser of Actual New Rent or Comparable Market Rent) - Base Monthly Rent ● Base Monthly Rent Determination: Base monthly rent is established as the lesser of:
○ Average monthly rent and utilities paid at the displacement unit prior to displacement; or
○ 30% of the household's average monthly gross income for low-income households (under HUD Orange County income standards).
● Disbursement Schedule: Payments are issued in periodic installments (or an initial advance for move-in costs plus final disbursement), with a final payment made at 10 months post-displacement. If a down payment option is utilized, the full payment will be made into escrow.
2. Last Resort Housing (LRH) Assistance
● Trigger Conditions: In accordance with 49 CFR § 24.404 and 25 CCR § 6000 et seq., Last Resort Housing (LRH) assistance will automatically be authorized when:
○ Computed 42-month rental assistance eligibility exceeds the statutory $9,570 cap; and
○ Monthly rental costs for available replacement housing (including utilities) exceed 30% of the household's gross monthly income; or
○ Comparable DS&S units are unavailable within statutory monetary limits. ● Supplemental Funding Commitment: The City guarantees additional housing subsidy funds beyond $9,570, as “Last Resort Housing” to cover full rent differentials, ensuring no tenant is displaced without affordable, available DS&S housing.
3. Down Payment Assistance (Homeownership Option)
● Lump-Sum Escrow Disbursement: Displaced tenants who elect to purchase a replacement home rather than rent may apply their full 42-month RHP entitlement (including calculated Last Resort Housing benefits) toward a down payment and eligible closing costs. ● Escrow Account Requirements: Funds are deposited directly into a designated title/escrow account and disbursed at closing, contingent upon DS&S inspection, escrow statement & payment instructions, agreements and other supporting documentation.
4. Permanent Moving Expense Payment Options
● Moving Costs are considered in the Temporary Relocation Program. ○ If a Fixed Moving Payment Option is selected, no further moving costs are available.
○ If a Professional Moving Company is selected, this option also includes:
■ Non-refundable initial hookup, connection, or setup charges required to re- establish essential residential utilities (electricity, water, gas, telephone) at the replacement dwelling.
■ Application and Credit check fees, as determined reasonable and necessary by the City, for actual expenses not to exceed $1,000, required to lease a replacement dwelling.
5. Relocation Advisory Services & DS&S Standards
● Comparable Housing Referrals: Relocation staff will provide each household with at least three (3) active referrals to comparable DS&S replacement dwellings matching household size, income level, and specialized needs (e.g., ground-floor units for seniors or individuals with disabilities).
● Mandatory DS&S Inspections: Prior to lease/contract execution or benefit disbursement, relocation agents will physically inspect every prospective unit to certify compliance with DS&S criteria.
● Transportation & Relocation Counseling: Transportation will be offered for inspecting replacement units, alongside hands-on assistance with lease applications, claim documentation, and preference registration for long-term housing programs (e.g., Housing Choice Vouchers).
6. Right of First Refusal for New Affordable Units
● Statutory Protection: Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66300.6, lowerincome tenants displaced by redevelopment will be granted a formal Right of First Refusal to occupy a comparable unit. This emergency plan is not related to a redevelopment.
However, if an affordable housing project is ever approved or constructed at the site, then lower-income tenants displaced through this emergency will be provided the right of first refusal to a unit in that project.
● Unit Allocation Criteria: In the latter circumstance, priority unit placement will be offered based on matching bedroom count, household size, and applicable HUD income criteria.
7. Administrative Notices, Grievance Procedures & Claims ● Vacate Notice Requirement: Due to the emergency situation and in compliance with 49 CFR 24.203(c) (4) the URA 90-Day Vacate requirement will be reduced to coincide with local building code requirements and current yellow tag condition. “Urgent need. In unusual circumstances, an occupant may be required to vacate the property on less than 90 days advance written notice if the agency determines that a 90-day notice is impracticable, such as when the person's continued occupancy of the property would constitute a substantial danger to health or safety.”
● Administrative Grievance & Appeal Rights: Tenants dissatisfied with benefit determinations, eligibility status, or replacement unit adequacy may file an appeal under 25 CCR § 6150 et seq. Informal reviews are conducted by the City Manager within 3 weeks, with access to a formal hearing before an independent hearing officer if the appellant is not satisfied with informal review. Appeals remain open up to 18 months post-displacement. ● Claim Requirements: Claims will be supported by actual receipts, invoices, approved estimates, or other satisfactory evidence. Relocation staff will advise and assist with the preparation of claims.
● Claim Filing Timeline: Relocation benefit claims and supporting documentation must be submitted within 18 months following physical displacement.
8. Estimated Program Budget & Schedule
The Temporary Relocation Assistance Program is expected to provide temporary housing until permanent replacement housing is secured and occupied. It is estimated that the tenants may require 3-6 months to occupy their replacement dwelling.
Below is the estimated budget breakdown for implementing the Emergency Temporary Relocation and Permanent Relocation Assistance Program for the 4 displaced residential households (comprising 19 total occupants across 2-bedroom units).
The City assures that they have, or will make available sufficient funding, staff and resources to implement the relocation assistance advisory program and other services described in this Plan.
The total budget estimate for relocation-related costs for this Project, including: temporary lodging, replacement housing payments, moving costs, storage costs and a 20% contingency is as follows:
Temporary Lodging $160,000
Moving & Related Costs $35,000
Replacement Housing Payments $450,000
Contingency at 20% $129,000
Emergency Relocation Costs Total $774,000
Budget Notes:
● Temporary Timeline Range: Hotel lodging and storage are budgeted assuming a maximum 6-month temporary displacement window.
● Moving & Related Costs: Covers two complete moving stages per household (initial move to temporary lodging/storage and final move to permanent DS&S replacement housing) and estimated storage costs. ● Permanent RHP/LRH: Based on an estimated average entitlement per household to cover 42-month rent differentials and Last Resort Housing assistance.
City of Stanton
Pride. Purpose. Progress.
7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA | Phone (714) 379-9222 | F ax (714) 890-1443 | StantonCA.gov September 16, 2026
Occupants
8891 and 8951 Pacific Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Dear Occupants:
This month the City inspected the roofing systems at 8891 and 8951 Pacific Avenue. Based on the conditions observed during that inspection and a report provided by the Building Inspector on September 10, 2026, the City’s Building Inspector has yellow tagged the buildings. A yellow tag indicates that a building is in a condition in which moderate damage could pose a risk to occupants. The conditions observed at the two properties that warranted the yellow tag included areas of soft roof sheathing, water-related deterioration to roof components, recurring water intrusion, ponding, deteriorated flashing, and concealed areas where the full extent of deterioration cannot be readily determined. These conditions are sufficient to raise a present building-safety concern, particularly as the properties enter the upcoming winter and rainy season.
Affected tenants should prepare for temporary relocation beginning approximately three weeks from the date of this notice, on or about October 8, 2026. This temporary relocation is intended to provide for occupant safety while the City proceeds with emergency permanent relocation measures.
The City Council is scheduled to consider a Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan for affected households at its meeting of September 22, 2026. If approved, the Plan is intended to establish procedures for administering the temporary emergency relocation process, including the provision and coordination of temporary relocation assistance, which may include:
1. Placement in nearby extended-stay accommodations with a kitchen; or
2. An emergency relocation stipend in lieu of City-arranged temporary lodging.
The Temporary Emergency Relocation Plan also provides for reasonable moving and storage costs during the temporary relocation period, subject to the relocation procedures and documentation requirements provided by the City or its relocation consultant.
The City and its relocation consultant will provide additional information on or about September 23, 2026, following City Council action.
The Yellow Tag and relocation measures are precautionary and prospective building-safety actions based on the conditions presently identified and are to protect the public health and safety. Nothing in this notice is intended to determine or concede the historical cause, duration, responsibility, ownership obligation, or liability associated with any condition at the properties, and the City expressly reserves all rights and defenses.
For any inquiries prior to September 23, 2026, please email [email protected].
Sincerely,
City of Stanton
16 de septiembre de 2026
Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.
City of Stanton
Pride. Purpose. Progress.
7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA | Phone (714) 379-9222 | F ax (714) 890-1443 | StantonCA.gov Ocupantes
8891 y 8951 Pacific Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Estimados ocupantes:
Este mes, la Ciudad inspeccionó los sistemas de techado de los edificios ubicados en 8891 y 8951 Pacific Avenue. Con base en las condiciones observadas durante dicha inspección y en un informe proporcionado por el Inspector de Construcción el 10 de septiembre de 2026, el Inspector de Construcción de la Ciudad colocó una etiqueta amarilla en ambos edificios. Una etiqueta amarilla indica que un edificio presenta condiciones en las que daños moderados podrían representar un riesgo para sus ocupantes. Entre las condiciones observadas en ambos inmuebles que justificaron la colocación de la etiqueta amarilla se encuentran áreas del revestimiento estructural del techo que presentan reblandecimiento, deterioro de componentes del techo relacionado con el agua, filtraciones recurrentes, acumulación de agua, tapajuntas deteriorados y áreas ocultas en las que no es posible determinar fácilmente el alcance total del deterioro.
Estas condiciones son suficientes para plantear una preocupación actual relacionada con la seguridad de los edificios, particularmente ante la próxima temporada de invierno y de lluvias.
Los inquilinos afectados deben prepararse para una reubicación temporal que comenzará aproximadamente tres semanas después de la fecha de este aviso, alrededor del 8 de octubre de 2026. Esta reubicación temporal tiene como propósito proteger la seguridad de los ocupantes mientras la Ciudad procede con las medidas de reubicación permanente de emergencia.
Está previsto que el Concejo Municipal considere un Plan de Reubicación Temporal de Emergencia para los hogares afectados durante su reunión del 22 de septiembre de 2026. Si se aprueba, el Plan tiene como propósito establecer los procedimientos para administrar el proceso de reubicación temporal de emergencia, incluida la provisión y coordinación de asistencia para la reubicación temporal, que podría incluir:
1. Alojamiento cercano para estadías prolongadas que cuente con cocina; o
2. Un subsidio de emergencia para reubicación, en lugar del alojamiento temporal coordinado por la Ciudad.
El Plan de Reubicación Temporal de Emergencia también contempla el pago de gastos razonables de mudanza y almacenamiento durante el período de reubicación temporal, sujeto a los procedimientos de reubicación y a los requisitos de documentación establecidos por la Ciudad o por su consultor de reubicación.
La Ciudad y su consultor de reubicación proporcionarán información adicional alrededor del 23 de septiembre de 2026, después de que el Concejo Municipal tome acción sobre este asunto.
La colocación de la etiqueta amarilla y las medidas de reubicación son acciones preventivas y prospectivas relacionadas con la seguridad de los edificios, basadas en las condiciones actualmente identificadas y destinadas a proteger la salud y seguridad públicas. Nada de lo contenido en este aviso pretende determinar ni admitir la causa histórica, la duración, la responsabilidad, la obligación relacionada con la propiedad ni la responsabilidad legal asociada con cualquiera de las condiciones existentes en los inmuebles. La Ciudad se reserva expresamente todos sus derechos y defensas.
Para cualquier consulta antes del 23 de septiembre de 2026, envíe un correo electrónico a [email protected].
Atentamente, Ciudad de Stanton
City Council Initiated Item
15D
(This item does not contain a staff report.)
Item 15D:
“Discussion regarding review of the City’s
Ordinance Pertaining to Temporary Signs.”
Item: 15D
Click here to return to the agenda.