Agenda packet, joint meeting — City Council and Concurrent Authorities, May 24, 2022 (part 1 of 8)

City Council/Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking Authority
Concurrent
City of Stockton
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Council/Successor
Agency of the
Redevelopment
Agency/Public Financing
Authority/Parking Authority
Concurrent Agenda
Kevin J. Lincoln II (At Large) Mayor/Chair
Christina Fugazi (District 5) Vice Mayor/Vice Chair
Sol Jobrack (District 1)
Daniel R. Wright (District 2)
Paul Canepa (District 3)
Susan Lenz (District 4)
Kimberly Warmsley (District 6)
Council Chamber, City Hall, 425 N. El Dorado
Street, Stockton CA
Tuesday, May 24, 2022 4:00 PM
Closed Session 4:00 PM :: Regular Session 5:30 PM

1. CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

2. ADDITIONS TO CLOSED SESSION AGENDA

3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION

3.1 22-0441 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Number of Cases: One
Name of Case: Kurt Wilson v. City Council of Stockton, et al. (San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.

STK-CV-UVM-2019-12404)
This Closed Session is authorized pursuant to section 54956.9(a) of the Government Code.

Department: City Attorney

3.2 22-0442 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
City of Stockton Page 1 Printed on 5/18/2022
1 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: Agency Designated Representative: City Manager Harry Black Employee Organizations: Unrepresented Units, Stockton City Employees' Association, Operating Engineer's Local 3, Mid-Management/Supervisory Level Unit, Unrepresented Management/Confidential, Law Department, Stockton Police Management Association, Stockton Firefighters Local 456 International Association of Firefighters, Stockton Fire Management, Stockton Police Officers' Association (SPOA)
This Closed Session is authorized pursuant to section 54957.6(a) of the Government Code.

Department: City Attorney

3.3 22-0443 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

Recommended Action: City Manager
This Closed Session is authorized pursuant to Government Code section 54957.

Department: City Attorney

3.4 22-0444 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

Recommended Action: City Attorney
This Closed Session is authorized pursuant to Government Code section 54957.

Department: City Attorney

3.5 22-0445 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

Recommended Action: City Clerk
This Closed Session is authorized pursuant to Government Code section 54957.

Department: City Attorney

3.6 22-0446 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION Number of Cases: One
Based on existing facts and circumstances, there is significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(b).

Department: City Attorney

4. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT*
City of Stockton Page 2 Printed on 5/18/2022
2 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final

5. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

6. REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

7. INVOCATION/PLEDGE TO FLAG

8. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION

9. ADDITIONS TO REGULAR SESSION AGENDA***

10. RECOGNITIONS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, OR REPORTS

10.1 22-0530 PROCLAMATION: FOSTER CARE AWARENESS MONTH
Department: Office of the Mayor

10.2 22-0532 COMMENDATION: DR. JAMES D. MORRISSEY, M.D.

Department: Office of the Mayor

11. PUBLIC COMMENTS* – MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA

12. CONSENT AGENDA

12.1 22-0291 AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS

WITH UNDERWRITER FIRMS TO ESTABLISH A POOL FOR THE

ISSUANCE OF MUNICIPAL DEBT
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with nine underwriter firms to establish a vendor pool, for the purpose of issuing bonds and other municipal debt instruments to finance capital facilities and infrastructure, and to refinance existing debt issuances.

It is also recommended that the motion authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the motion.

Department: Administrative Services
City of Stockton Page 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
3 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Attachment A - Blaylock - Underwriter Services
Attachment B - Citi - Underwriter Services
Attachment C - DA Davidson - Underwriter Services
Attachment D - Hilltop - Underwriter Services
Attachment E - Oppenheimer - Underwriter Services
Attachment F - Piper Sandler - Underwriter Services
Attachment G - RBC Capital Markets - Underwriter Services Attachment H - Stifel - Underwriter Services
Attachment I - Wells Fargo - Underwriter Services
Attachments:

12.2 22-0301 ACCEPT THE QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2022
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept by motion the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.

Department: Administrative Services
Attachment A - Quarterly Investment Report
Attachment B - Certification of Quarterly Investment Report Attachments:

12.3 22-0495 APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
Approve the minutes from the City Council meeting of March 22, 2022 Department: City Clerk
Attachments: Attachment A – 2022-03-22 Minutes

12.4 22-0531 REJECT ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR AI/CHATBOT CUSTOMER

SERVICE AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ENHANCEMENTS
(PUR-22-006)
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to reject all bids received on March 31, 2022, for the AI/ChatBot Customer Service and Community Engagement Enhancements (PUR-22-006) in accordance with Stockton Municipal Code 3.68.160(B).

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.

Department: City Manager

12.5 22-0367 ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL MAP AND City of Stockton Page 4 Printed on 5/18/2022
4 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR CANNERY PARK, UNIT NO. 7
(VILLAGE F2) TRACT NO. 3688 PROJECT
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve the final map for Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement, accept on behalf of the public all offers of dedication, and record the final map for Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Department: Community Development
Attachment A Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution - Cannery Park Unit 7
Exhibit 1 - Map Agreement
Exhibit 2 - Cannery Park Unit 7 Village F2
Attachments:

12.6 22-0396 ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL MAP AND

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR THE WESTLAKE VILLAGES, UNIT
NO. 10 - VILLAGE K (TRACT NO. 3577) PROJECT
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve the final map for Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 - Village K, Tract No. 3577;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement, accept on behalf of the public all offers of dedication, and record the final map for Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 - Village K, Tract No. 3577; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Department: Community Development
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution - Westlake Village K
Exhibit 1 - Westlake Unit 10 Village K Map Ggreement
Exhibit 2 - Village K Final Map
Attachments:

12.7 22-0450 ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RELINQUISHMENT OF

RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG THE PORTION OF PROPERTY
City of Stockton Page 5 Printed on 5/18/2022
5 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
FRONTAGE AT 4850 S. STATE ROUTE 99 E. FRONTAGE ROAD
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve relinquishing restricted access of a thirty-foot (30') portion of property frontage at 4850 S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road.

2. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Community Development
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution - 4850 State Route
Exhibit 1 - Relinquishment Legal & Plat
Attachments:

12.8 22-0274 AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRMS

FOR ON-CALL CONTRACT SUPPORT FOR BUILDING CODE PLAN

REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, AND

INSPECTION SERVICES
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with the following professional firms for on-call contract support for Building Code Plan Review, Structural Engineering Plan Review, and Inspection Services for a total not to exceed amount of $2,500,000 across the entire vendor pool:
* CSG Consultants, Inc., Foster City, CA
* BPR Consulting Group, LLC, El Dorado Hills, CA
It is further recommended that Council authorize the City Manager to take all necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the motion.

Department: Community Development
Attachment A - Agreement 2017-06-20-1103 NP
Attachment B - Firm Proposals
Attachment C - Professional Services Agreement
Attachments:

12.9 22-0190 APPROVE A MOTION TO ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE

AGREEMENT WITH TELCION COMMUNICATION GROUP THROUGH
MERCED COUNTY.

City of Stockton Page 6 Printed on 5/18/2022
6 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a motion to:

1. Approve the use of a Cooperative Agreement through Merced County Fast Open Contracts Utilization Services (FOCUS) Contract Number 2021106 with Telcion Communications Group to acquire
telecommunication services, related equipment, supplies and maintenance services.

2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a multi-year Cooperative Purchasing Agreement, expiring June 7, 2024 in an amount not to exceed $750,000 with Telcion Communication Group (Attachment A).

3. Approve findings which support and justify an exception to the competitive bid process; and

4. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to take necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.

Department: Information Technology
Attachments: Attachment A - COOP Agreement - Telcion

12.10 22-0318 APPROVE FINDINGS AND EXECUTE CONTRACT AGREEMENTS

FOR THE PURCHASE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER

TREATMENT CHEMICALS THROUGH THE BAY AREA CHEMICAL

CONSORTIUM
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Approving findings in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute six (6) contracts for the purchase of chemicals for water and wastewater treatment for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Department: Municipal Utilities
City of Stockton Page 7 Printed on 5/18/2022
7 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit1_BACC-Ammonia-2022-23
Exhibit2_BACC-SodiumBisulfite-2022-23
Exhibit3_BACC-SodiumHydroxide(25%)-2022-23
Exhibit4_BACC-SodiumHydroxide(50%)-2022-23
Exhibit5_BACC-SodiumHypochlorite-2022-23
Exhibit6_BACC-CitricAcid-2022-23
Attachments:

12.11 22-0399 AUTHORIZE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH BAYLOR SERVICES INC. FOR CLEANUP OF MCLEOD LAKE AT WEBER

POINT AND DECARLI PLAZA
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Authorize contract Amendment No. 1 with Baylor Services Inc., Stockton in the amount of $65,000, and modify the Contract Scope in Paragraph 2 of Exhibit A, Section 2.1 to include up to four (4) cleanup sessions per month (Exhibit 1 to the Resolution).

2. Appropriate $50,000 from the General Fund and a total of $15,000 from the Municipal Utilities Department Collections and Stormwater Funds with total contract services not to exceed $137,500.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Department: Municipal Utilities
Attachment A - Contract No. 2020-05-28-S002
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Contract Amendment No. 1
Attachments:

12.12 22-0411 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A PUMP AND MOTOR FROM PUMP REPAIR SERVICE CO. FOR THE REGIONAL
WASTEWATER CONTROL FACILITY BIOTOWER PUMP #2
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the purchase of a replacement pump and motor from Pump Repair Service Co. for the Regional Wastewater Control Facility Biotower #2.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Municipal Utilities
City of Stockton Page 8 Printed on 5/18/2022
8 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Attachment A - Pump Repair Services
Proposed Resolution
Attachments:

12.13 22-0388 ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE PAVEMENT REPAIR ON

VARIOUS STREETS PROJECT
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve Notice of Exemption No. NOE2-22 under the California Environmental Quality Act for the Pavement Repair on Various Streets, Project No. WT22003.

2. Approve the plans and specifications for the Pavement Repair on Various Streets, Project No. WT22003.

3. Award a Construction Contract in the amount of $294,304 to Consolidated Engineering, Inc. of Valley Springs, CA, for the Pavement Repair on Various Streets, Project No. WT22003.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Notice of Exemption
Exhibit 2 - Construction Contract
Attachments:

12.14 22-0317 ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE SIERRA NEVADA

STREET SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT
City of Stockton Page 9 Printed on 5/18/2022
9 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve the Notice of Exemption No. NOE13-20 under the California Environmental Quality Act for the Sierra Nevada Street Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation, Project No. UW18029.

2. Approve the plans and specifications for the Sierra Nevada Street Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation, Project No. UW18029.

3. Appropriate funds in the amount of $752,475 from the Wastewater Utility Fund Balance to the Sierra Nevada Street Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation, Project No. UW18029.

4. Award a Construction Contract in the amount of $2,291,738 to SAK Construction, LLC of O'Fallon, MO, for the Sierra Nevada Street Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation, Project No. UW18029.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1- Notice of Exemption
Exhibit 2 - Construction Contract
Attachments:

12.15 22-0214 APPROVE MOTION TO AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

CONTRACT FOR THE FIBER OPTIC MASTER PLAN EXPANSION
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to:

1. Award a Professional Services Contract to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., of Oakland, CA, in the amount of $265,000, for the Fiber Optic Master Plan Expansion, Project No. WARP503.

2. Approve findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.

Department: Public Works
Attachments: Attachment A - Contract with Kimley-Horn

12.16 22-0070 ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE WEST LANE TRAFFIC City of Stockton Page 10 Printed on 5/18/2022
10 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final

RESPONSIVE SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM PROJECT
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve the Notice of Exemption No. NOE10-20 under the California Environmental Quality Act for the West Lane Traffic Responsive Signal Control System, Project No. WT16011/Federal Project No.

CML-5008(165).

2. Approve the plans and specifications for the West Lane Traffic Responsive Signal Control System, Project No. WT16011/Federal Project No. CML-5008(165).

3. Transfer funds in the amount of $91,596 from the Traffic Signal Modification Program, Project No. WT15029, to the West Lane Traffic Responsive Signal Control System, Project No. WT16011/Federal Project No. CML-5008(165).

4. Appropriate additional funds in the amount of $712,617 from the federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality program grant funds to the West Lane Traffic Responsive Signal Control System, Project No. WT16011/Federal Project No. CML-5008(165).

5. Award a Construction Contract in the amount of $1,124,855 to Ray's Electric of Oakland, CA, for the West Lane Traffic Responsive Signal Control System, Project No. WT16011/Federal Project No.

CML-5008(165).

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Notice of Exemption
Exhibit 2 - Construction Contract
Attachments:

12.17 22-0096 ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10, AMENDMENT NO. 2, AND APPROPRIATE AND

TRANSFER FUNDING FOR THE MINER AVENUE COMPLETE

STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
City of Stockton Page 11 Printed on 5/18/2022
11 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Appropriate additional funds in the amount of $752,705 from the State of California Federal Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 Funds to the Contract Change Order No. 10, Miner Avenue Complete Street Improvements, Project No.

WT16007/Federal Project No. ATPL-5008(158).

2. Appropriate additional funds in the amount of $140,000 from the Measure K Maintenance fund balance to the Professional Services Contract Amendment No. 2, Miner Avenue Complete Street Improvements, Project No. WT17032.

3. Transfer funds in the amount of $500,000 from the Traffic Signal Modification Program, Project No. WT15029, to the Contract Change Order No. 10, Miner Avenue Complete Street Improvements, Project No.

WT17032/Federal Project No. ATPSB1L-5008(170).

4. Authorize Construction Contract Change Order No. 10, in the amount of $452,152.55, with George Reed, Inc., for the Miner Avenue Complete Street Improvements, Project No. WT16007/Federal Project No.

ATPL-5008(158); Project No. WT17032/Federal Project No.

ATPSB1L-5008(170); and Project No. WT15015/Federal Project No.

CML-5008(188).

5. Authorize Professional Services Contract Amendment No. 2, in the amount of $135,267.62, with Salaber Associates, Inc., for the Miner Avenue Complete Street Improvements, Project No. WT17032.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Public Works
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - CCO No. 10 - George Reed
Exhibit 2 - Amendment No 2 - Salaber
Attachments:

12.18 22-0176 ADOPT RESOLUTION TO REJECT BID, AUTHORIZE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MEASURE K RENEWAL COOPERATIVE

AGREEMENT, AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS TO THE CALIFORNIA

STREET ROAD DIET PROJECT
City of Stockton Page 12 Printed on 5/18/2022
12 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Reject the bid received for the California Street Road Diet, Project No.

WT18005, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.160(B).

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Measure K Renewal Cooperative Agreement between the City and San Joaquin Council of Governments from the Measure K Smart Growth Incentive Program Cycle 2 for a total of $2,000,000 for the California Street Road Diet, Project No.

WT18005.

3. Appropriate funds in the amount of $2,000,000 from the Measure K Smart Growth Incentive Program Cycle 2 to the California Street Road Diet, Project No. WT18005.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - MK Cooperative Agreement
Attachments:

12.19 22-0275 APPROVE FINDINGS FOR EMERGENCY CONSTRUCTION OF THE

TEEN IMPACT CENTER ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to:

1. Accept findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process for an emergency contract.

2. Approve payment in the amount of $290,934.18 to Stratus Construction Co. of Stockton, CA, for construction of the Teen Impact Center Roof Replacement, Project No. CR22002.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Construction Contract
Attachment B - CCO No. 1
Attachments:

12.20 22-0279 ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

PHASE V PROJECT
City of Stockton Page 13 Printed on 5/18/2022
13 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve the Notice of Exemption No. NOE16-19 under the California Environmental Quality Act for the Bus Rapid Transit Phase V, Project No.

WT15016/Federal Project No. CML-5008(149).

2. Approve the plans and specifications for the Bus Rapid Transit Phase V, Project No. WT15016/Federal Project No. CML-5008(149).

3. Transfer funds in the amount of $200,000 from the Traffic Signal Modification Program, Project No. WT15029, to the Bus Rapid Transit Phase V, Project No. WT15016/Federal Project No. CML-5008(149).

4. Transfer funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Accessible Pedestrian Signals Program, Project No. WT15028, to the Bus Rapid Transit Phase V, Project No. WT15016/Federal Project No.

CML-5008(149).

5. Transfer funds in the amount of $180,000 from the Public Facility Fees Streets Fund Balance to the Bus Rapid Transit Phase V, Project No.

WT15016/Federal Project No. CML-5008(149).

6. Award a Construction Contract in the amount of $2,068,490 to Ray's Electric of Oakland, CA, for the Bus Rapid Transit Phase V, Project No.

WT15016/Federal Project No. CML-5008(149).

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Notice of Exemption
Exhibit 2 - Construction Contract
Attachments:

12.21 22-0292 APPROVE MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE AQUATIC FACILITIES

RENOVATION AND REPLACEMENT - VICTORY PARK POOL

PROJECT
City of Stockton Page 14 Printed on 5/18/2022
14 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to:

1. Award a Professional Services Contract to Studio W Architects of Sacramento, CA, in the amount of $454,318, for design of the Aquatic Facilities Renovation and Replacement - Victory Park Pool, Project No.

CR18020.

2. Approve findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Attachment B - Professional Services Contract
Attachments:

12.22 22-0296 APPROVE MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE FIRE STATION NO. 2

COMMUNICATION CENTER UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY

REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Fire Station No. 2 Communication Center Uninterruptible Power Supply Replacement, Project No. F022001.

2. Award a Construction Contract in the amount of $150,000 to Tri Power Systems of Modesto, CA, for the Fire Station No. 2 Communication Center Uninterruptible Power Supply Replacement, Project No. F022001.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Attachment B - Construction Contract
Attachments:

13. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

14. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

15. NEW BUSINESS

15.1 22-0493 UPDATE ON THE VAN BUSKIRK STRATEGIC RE-USE PROJECT City of Stockton Page 15 Printed on 5/18/2022
15 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
Informational only. No action to be taken.

Department: Community Services
Attachments: 15.1 - PPT - Van Buskirk Strategic Re-Use Project

15.2 22-0380 APPROVE BY MOTION A RECOMMENDED USE OF AMERICAN

RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) CONTINGENCY FUNDS
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council, by motion:

1. Authorize the appropriation of $2.5 million in ARPA contingency funds:
a) $1.5 million to support the Uplift Downtown Initiative to support improvements at the Stockton Arena;
b) $500,000 to support continued traffic and safety improvement projects within the Miracle Mile District; and,
c) $500,000 to support unfunded, State-mandated, COVID-related sick leave.

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute documents and contracts related to this recommendation in compliance with the City's emergency procurement policies; and,

3. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary action to carry out the purpose and intent of this action.

Department: City Manager

15.3 22-0414 APPROVE A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION FOR THE FORMATION

OF THE MIRACLE MILE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

AND AUTHORIZING BALLOTS FOR CITY-OWNED PROPERTY IN

THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BE CAST IN FAVOR OF FORMATION
City of Stockton Page 16 Printed on 5/18/2022
16 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention:

1. Expressing Council's intent to form the Miracle Mile Community Improvement District;

2. Accepting Petitions of Property Owners;

3. Preliminarily approving the Management District Plan and Engineer's Report;

4. Approving the proposed Boundary Map;

5. Setting a date for a Public Hearing on the establishment of the Miracle Mile Community Improvement District and the levy of assessments for July 26, 2022;

6. Providing for property owner ballots and notices of the public hearing to be mailed; and

7. Authorizing and directing the City Manager, or designee, to sign the ballots for City-owned properties in the proposed district to be in favor of formation.

8. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

Department: Economic Development
Attachment A - SMC Ordinance 2022-03-22-1211
Attachment B - Resolution No. 07-0310
Attachment C - Resolution No. 2012-06-26-1601
Attachment D - Resolution No. 2017-12-28-0801
Proposed Resolution - MMCID Resolution of Intention
Exhibit 1 - Boundary Map
Exhibit 2 - Management Plan and Engineers Report
Exhibit 3 - Notice

15.3 - PPT - Renewal MMCID
Attachments:

15.4 22-0284 ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANIMAL SHELTER

RENOVATION PROJECT
City of Stockton Page 17 Printed on 5/18/2022
17 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Award a Professional Services Contract to Swatt Miers Architects of Emeryville, CA, in the amount of $712,809, for design of the Animal Shelter Renovation, Project No. P023001.

2. Approve findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Department: Public Works
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Proposed Resolution - Animal Shelter Reno Project
Exhibit 1 - Professional Services Contract

15.4 - PPT - Animal Shelter Renovation Project
Attachments:

16. HEARINGS**

16.1 22-0483 APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO COMMISSION USE PERMIT (P17-0134) TO ALLOW

THE EXPANSION OF A CANNABIS STOREFRONT RETAILER
BUSINESS WITHIN A 31,780 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING AT 2401/2403 STAGECOACH ROAD (APPLICATION NO.

P21-0311) (APN 173-320-18)
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's decision to approve the following:

1. A finding that the proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301(a) (Existing Facilites) since the project will occupy an existing facility and no expansion of building or site is proposed.

2. An Amendment to a Use Permit for a Cannabis Retailer Storefront Business (P17-0134) to allow an 13,159 square foot floor area expansion within a 31,780 square foot industrial building, based on findings and subject to conditions in the proposed resolution.

Department: Community Development
City of Stockton Page 18 Printed on 5/18/2022
18 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
Attachment A - Location Map
Attachment B - Approved Resolutions
Attachment C - P18-0720 Approved Site Plan
Attachment D - Existing Cannabis Business Locations
Attachment E - Project Plans
Attachment F - Planning Commission Resolution 2021-12-09-0501 Attachment G - Appeal
Proposed Resolution - Stagecoach Road
Exhibit 1 - Project Plans

16.1 - PPT - Appeal - 2401-2403 Stagecoach Road
Attachments:

17. CITY MANAGER'S UPDATE

18. COUNCIL COMMENTS

19. ADJOURNMENT

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1 22-0378 STRONG COMMUNITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL

REPORT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR
2019-20
Recommended Action: RECOMMENDATION
This item is an informational item submitting the Strong Communities Advisory Committee Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2019-20 to the City Council.

Department: Administrative Services
Attachments: Attachment A - Measure M FY 2019-20 Annual Report City of Stockton Page 19 Printed on 5/18/2022
19 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final

CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that I am employed by the City of Stockton and that I caused this agenda to be posted in the City Hall notice case on May 18, 2022 in compliance with the Brown Act.

Eliza R. Garza, CMC
City Clerk
By: ________________________________
Deputy
City of Stockton Page 20 Printed on 5/18/2022
20 City Council/Successor Agency to May 24, 2022
the Redevelopment Agency/Public
Financing Authority/Parking
Authority Concurrent
Meeting Agenda - Final
*Citizens may comment on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council/Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency/Public Finance Authority/Parking Authority, including items on the Agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. Speakers must submit “Request to Speak” cards to the City Clerk, and be prepared to speak when called. No speaker cards will be received after the close of the Citizen’s Comments portion of the meeting.
**Speakers should hold comments on items listed as a Hearing until the Hearing is opened. If a large number of people desire to speak at a Hearing, the Mayor/Chair may reduce the amount of time allocated to each speaker to three (3) minutes.
***Additions to the Agenda - Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), allows members of the City Council present at the meeting to take immediate action, with either a two-thirds or unanimous vote, to place an item on the agenda that action must be taken and that the item came to the attention of the City subsequent to the agenda being posted.

All proceedings before this meeting body are conducted in English. The City of Stockton does not furnish language interpreters and, if one is needed, it shall be the responsibility of the person needing one.

In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act and California Law, it is the policy of the City of Stockton to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including those with disabilities. If you are disabled and require a copy of a public hearing notice, or an agenda and/or agenda packet in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require other accommodation, please contact the Office of the City Clerk located at 425 North El Dorado Street, Stockton, California 95202 during normal business hours or by calling (209) 937-8459, at least 5 days in advance of the hearing/meeting. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City/Agency to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's Office at 425 North El Dorado Street, Stockton, California 95202, during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City's website at www.stocktongov.com subject to staff's ability to post the documents before the meeting.

CHALLENGING CITY DECISIONS: The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision. Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. If a person wishes to challenge the nature of the above section in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Stockton, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies.

City of Stockton Page 21 Printed on 5/18/2022
21 City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0291, Version: 1

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH UNDERWRITER FIRMS

TO ESTABLISH A POOL FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MUNICIPAL DEBT

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with nine underwriter firms to establish a vendor pool, for the purpose of issuing bonds and other municipal debt instruments to finance capital facilities and infrastructure, and to refinance existing debt issuances.

It is also recommended that the motion authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the motion.

Summary
The City, on an as-needed basis, issues debt to finance the construction of capital facilities and infrastructure, and to refinance existing debt when it is advantageous to do so. The frequency varies from year to year; however, the City typically will issue debt or refinance existing debt from two to five times per year. The City usually issues several types of debt, including but not limited to: Lease Revenue Bonds, Certificates of Participation, Revenue Bonds, and Land-secured debt (1913/15 Act assessment bonds, Mello-Roos or Marks-Roos bonds).

Entering into agreements with the nine selected underwriter firms will create a pool of pre-qualified firms that will provide investment banking and underwriting services to support City debt issuances.

DISCUSSION
Background
The City periodically establishes a pool of underwriters to support debt issuances. The City requires professional investment banking and underwriting services to effectively market and issue its debt at the lowest cost. By establishing a pool, the City can react quickly to financing needs based on favorable market conditions to finance projects and refinance existing debt.

The City’s most recent Underwriter Pool was established July 25, 2017, by Motion 2017-07-25-1101, which authorized the execution of five-year agreements with underwriters for the issuance of municipal debt.

Present Situation
On December 18, 2021, the City released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for financial underwriting City of Stockton Page 1 of 2 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
22 File #: 22-0291, Version: 1
services. The RFP ensured a fair and competitive procurement of underwriting services. The City sought qualified underwriting firms with the ability to:
· Provide high-quality underwriting services for issuing debt to construct capital facilities and infrastructure and refinancing existing debt.
· Assist in the development of a sound financing plan for the capital facility or infrastructure that is planned to be financed and assist in the establishment of a district. · Assist and advise the City as to the most cost-effective financing plan for the debt that is being considered and recommend innovative alternatives.

The City received responses from nine interested underwriting firms and all nine firms met the minimum qualifications. A selection committee was formed to review the submitted proposals. After careful review of each firm’s capabilities and ability to meet the City’s financing needs, the selection committee recommended the City enter agreements with all nine firms that submitted proposals. All nine firms in the City’s Underwriter Pool can provide services for type of financing the City may pursue. With the establishment of this Pool, the City will have a diverse group of highly qualified underwriting firms available when needed.

Based on the submitted proposals and evaluations by the selection committee, it is recommended the City enter agreements with the following firms: Blaylock Van, LLC; Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.; D.A. Davidson & Co.; Hilltop Securities, Inc.; Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.; Piper Sandler & Co.; RBC Capital Markets, LLC; Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.; and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
All underwriting fees are paid from bond proceeds contingent upon the successful closing of bond transactions.

Fees for services will be negotiated by staff and approved by the City Council on a per transaction basis, in accordance with the provisions of the City’s Land-Based and Capital Financing Policy, and Debt Management Policy.

Attachment A - Contract with Blaylock Van LLC
Attachment B - Contract with Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Attachment C - Contract with D.A. Davidson & Co.

Attachment D - Contract with Hilltop Securities Inc.

Attachment E - Contract with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.

Attachment F - Contract with Piper Sandler & Co.

Attachment G - Contract with RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Attachment H - Contract with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.

Attachment I - Contract with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 2 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
23 24
Attachment A 25
Attachment A 26
Attachment A 27
Attachment A 28
Attachment A 29
Attachment A 30
1 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Goods, Equipment and Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A of the Agreement. Contractor shall provide said services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A of the Agreement.

2. City Assistance, Facilities, Equipment and Clerical Support. Except as set forth in Exhibit A, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish and maintain all facilities and equipment that may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. If applicable, City shall furnish to Contractor only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit A to the Agreement.

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

3.1Invoices submitted by Contractor to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time spent and City reference number. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s invoice, City will review invoice, and if acceptable make payment on approved invoice.

3.2 Upon completion of work and acceptance by City, Contractor shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitation. The City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed which the Contractor fails or neglects to submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after the work is accepted by the City.

4. Sufficiency of Contractor’s Work. All Contractor services, work, and deliverables shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner with due diligence in accordance with the degree of skill normally exercised by similar contractors supplying services and work of a similar nature, and in conformance with applicable laws, codes and professional standards. Contractor’s work shall be adequate and sufficient to meet the purposes of this Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment A
31 2
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

Contractor and its approved subcontractors shall keep materials confidential. Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Agreement and shall not be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services, unless the City provides prior written consent.

6. Timeliness. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Further, Contractor acknowledges that the failure of Contractor to comply with the time limits described in Exhibit A and Exhibit F may result in economic or other losses to the City.

7. Changes. Both parties to this Agreement understand that it may become desirable or necessary during the term of this Agreement for City to modify the scope of services provided for under this Agreement. Any material extension or change in the scope of work shall be discussed with City and the change and cost shall be memorialized in a written amendment to the original contract prior to the performance of the additional work. Until the amendment is so executed, City will not be responsible to pay any charges Contractor may incur in performing such additional services, and Contractor shall not be required to perform any such additional services.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

9.1 In performing the obligations set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall have the status of an independent contractor and Contractor shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Contractor are its agents and employees and are not agents or employees of City. Contractor by virtue of this Agreement, has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of City. Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City. No agent, officer or employee of the City is to be considered an employee of the Contractor.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment A
32 3
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

9.3 If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision and control of Contractor. All terms of employment including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring and discharging or any other term of employment or requirements of law shall be determined by the Contractor.

9.4 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor's assigned personnel under the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.1 Subcontractors shall not be recognized as having any direct or contractual relationship with City. Contractor shall be responsible for the work of subcontractors, which shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Subcontractors will be provided with a copy of the Agreement and be bound by its terms. Contractor is responsible to City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and persons directly or indirectly employed by them.

10.2 If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision and control of Contractor. All terms of employment including hours, wages working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging or any other term of employment or requirement of law shall be determined by Contractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

11.1 Termination for Convenience of City. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Contractor. The Agreement shall then be deemed terminated, and no further work shall be performed by Contractor. If the Agreement is so terminated, the Contractor shall be paid for the work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received.

Attachment A
33 4
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

11.2 Should either party default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, the other party, at that party’s option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to the other party.

11.3 Funding- Non-Appropriation. It is mutually understood between the Parties that payment to the Contractor for performance shall be dependent upon the availability of appropriations by the City Council for the purposes of this Agreement. No legal liability on the part of the City for any payment may arise under this Agreement until funds are made available and until the Contractor has received funding availability, which will be confirmed in writing. If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted, or if the City loses funding for any reason, the City, in its sole discretion, shall have the option to either (a) cause this Agreement to be canceled or terminated pursuant to applicable provisions of the Agreement; or (b) offer to amend the Agreement to reflect the reduced funding for this Agreement.

12. Non-Assignability. The Contractor shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any interest or obligation in the Agreement without the prior written consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may set forth in writing. Contractor shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors.

13. Indemnity and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall hold harmless, defend at its own expense, and indemnify the City of Stockton, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, against any and all liability, claims, losses, damages, or expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, arising from all acts or omissions of contractor or its officers, agents, or employees in rendering services under this contract; excluding, however, such liability, claims, losses, damages, or expenses arising from the City of Stockton’s sole negligence or willful acts.

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

14. Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain in full force and effect at its own cost and expense the insurance coverage as set forth in the attached Exhibit B to this Agreement and shall otherwise comply with the other provisions of Exhibit B to this Agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

16. Conformance to Applicable Laws. Contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Contractor shall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of services under this Agreement on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person.

Attachment A
34 5
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

17. Licenses, Certifications and Permits. Prior to the City’s execution of this Agreement and prior to the Contractor’s engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall obtain a City of Stockton business license, which must be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor covenants that it has obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Agreement. Such licenses, certificates and permits shall be maintained in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement.

18. Records and Audits. Contractor shall maintain all records regarding this Agreement and the services performed for a period of three (3) years from the date that final payment is made. At any time during normal business hours, the records shall be made available to the City to inspect and audit. To the extent Contractor renders services on a time and materials basis, Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate accounting records, in a form prescribed by City or, if not prescribed by City, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, such records to include, but not be limited to, payroll records, attendance cards, time sheets, and job summaries.

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

20. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor covenants that other than this Agreement, Contractor has no financial interest with any official, employee or other representative of the City. Contractor and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any manner of degree by the performance of Contractor’s services under this Agreement. If such an interest arises, Contractor shall immediately notify the City.

21. Waiver. In the event either City or Contractor at any time waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition or obligation. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial acceptance by City shall operate as a waiver on the part of City of any of its rights under this Agreement.

22. Governing Law. California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue for all claims in the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin, Stockton Branch or, where applicable, in the Federal District Court of California, Eastern District, Sacramento Division.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment A
35 6
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

24. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction or if it is found in contravention of any federal, state or city statue, ordinance or regulation the remaining provisions of this Agreement or the application thereof shall not be invalidated thereby and shall remain in full force and effect to the extent that the provisions of this Agreement are severable.

25. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor and its officers, employees, agents, representatives or subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state, or local law, rule or regulation against any employee, applicant for employment or person receiving services under this Agreement because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition (including genetic characteristics), marital status, age, political affiliation, gender identity, gender expression, sex or sexual orientation, family and medical care leave, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. Contractor and its officers, employees, agents, representative or subcontractors shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations related to non-discrimination and equal opportunity, including without limitation the City’s nondiscrimination policy; the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code sections 12990 (et seq.); California Labor Code sections 1101, 1102 and 1102.1; the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), as amended; and all applicable regulations promulgated in the California Code of Regulation or Code of Federal Regulations. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that “no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” (42 USC Section 2000d).
http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titlevi.htm. The City requires compliance with the requirements of Title VI in all of its programs and activities regardless of funding source.

26. Force Majeure. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or failures in performance resulting from acts of God, acts of civil or military authority, terrorism, fire, flood, strikes, war, epidemics, pandemics, shortage of power or other acts or causes reasonably beyond the control of that party. The party experiencing the force majeure event agrees to give the other party notice promptly following the occurrence of a force majeure event, and to use diligent efforts to re-commence performance as promptly as commercially practicable.

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment A
36 7
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.1 This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between Contractor and the City; supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral between the parties and may be amended only by a written Amendment signed by the Contractor and City Manager.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

32. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment A
37 Attachment A 38
Attachment A 39
Attachment A 40
Attachment A 41
Attachment A 42
Attachment A 43
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment A 44
Attachment B

CITY OF STOCKTON
STANDARD AGREEMENT I AgreementNumber:

1. Thi& Agreement Is entered Into between the City of stookton ('City") and Citigroup Global Marko1• lno. ("Contractor") to provide Ananclal Und•IVlllt•r Servi ... as set forth In Exhibit A to this Agreement.

2. The term of this Agreement Is as follows, unless amended as described In Exhibit A and Exhibit C section 8:

Commences on: July 1, 2022 Terminates on: June 30, 2027

3. The maximum not to exoeed amount to be paid to Contractor for the term of this Agreement, Including If authorized, reimbursement of expenses, Is: $ !See EXhibtl E I

4. The complete Agreement consists of all the following Agreement documents which by refe1ence are Incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
(a) Exhlbll A~ Statement of Work
(b) exhibit B - ln::;urance
(c) Exhibit C - GenelSI Terms & Conditions
(d) Exhibit 0- Professional SeNlces Special Terms & Conditions (e) Exhibit E - Compensation Schedule
(f) Exhibit F - Tlmellne
(g) Exhibit G " Speeial Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA {If •Pl'lioobte cheok wx)YES □ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized parties hav, exe�uted this Agreement.

Contract s Ndme (W other Iha
!!ct i
Address
Harry Black, City Manager
ATTEST:

Eliza R, Garza CMC, Clty Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CONTRACTOR
{Y7 tt¾. {Ce,½ / n c .
n lndl dual. state whether a corporation, partners p, etc.):

I,_ 2..:2_
c.fi

CITY OF STOCKTON
Date
Lori M. Asuncion, Acting City Attorney
1 (Rev, 9.21,22)
45 Attachment B 46
Attachment B 47
Attachment B 48
Attachment B 49
Attachment B 50
Attachment B 51
1 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment B
52 2
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment B
53 3
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

Attachment B
54 4
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Attachment B
55 5
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment B
56 6
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment B
57 7
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment B
58 Attachment B 59
Attachment B 60
Attachment B 61
Attachment B 62
Attachment B 63
Attachment B 64
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment B 65
Attachment C 66
Attachment C 67
Attachment C 68
Attachment C 69
Attachment C 70
Attachment C 71
Attachment C 72
1 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment C
73 2
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment C
74 3
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

Attachment C
75 4
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Attachment C
76 5
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment C
77 6
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment C
78 7
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment C
79 Attachment C 80
Attachment C 81
Attachment C 82
Attachment C 83
Attachment C 84
Attachment C 85
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment C 86
Attachment D
87 Attachment D
88 Attachment D
89 Attachment D
90 Attachment D
91 Attachment D
92 Attachment D
93 1
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment D
94 2
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment D
95 3
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

Attachment D
96 4
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Attachment D
97 5
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment D
98 6
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment D
99 7
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment D
100
Attachment D
101
Attachment D
102
Attachment D
103
Attachment D
104
Attachment D
105
Attachment D
106
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment D 107

CITY OF STOCKTON

STANDARD AGREEMENT

1. This Agreement Is entered into between the City of Stockton ("City") and I Agreement Number:

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. ("Contractor'') to provide Financial Underwriter Services as set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

2. The term of this Agreement is as follows, unless amended as described in Exhibit A and Exhibit C section 8:

Commences on: July 1, 2022 Terminates on: June 30, 2027

3. The maximum not to exceed amount to be paid to Contractor for the term of this Agreement, including if authorized, reimbursement of expenses, is: $ !See Exhibit E I

4. The complete Agreement consists of all the following Agreement documents which by reference are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
(a) Exhibit A- Statement of Work
(b) Exhibit B - Insurance
( c) Exhibit C - General Terms & Conditions
(d) Exhibit D - Professional Services Special Terms & Conditions (e) Exhibit E - Compensation Schedule
(f) Exhibit F - Timeline
(g) Exhibit G- Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA (ltapplicablecheckbox)YES D IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized parties have executed this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR
Contractor's Name (if other than an individual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.):

Authorized Signature
Printed Name and Title of Person Signing
Address

CITY OF STOCKTON
Harry Black, City Manager
ATTEST:

Eliza R. Garza CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lori M. Asuncion, Acting City Attorney
BY:
(Rev. 3.22.22)
1 Date
Date
4/22/22
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.

Rick Brandis
580 California St., Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA 94104 Managing Director
Attachment E 108
Attachment E 109
Attachment E 110
Attachment E 111
Attachment E 112
Attachment E 113
Attachment E 114
1 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment E
115
2 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment E
116
3 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

Attachment E
117
4 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Attachment E
118
5 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment E
119
6 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment E
120
7 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment E
121
Attachment E 122
Attachment E 123
Attachment E 124
Attachment E 125
Attachment E 126
Attachment E 127
Attachment E 128
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment E 129
Attachment F 130
Attachment F 131
Attachment F 132
Attachment F 133
Attachment F 134
Attachment F 135
Attachment F 136
1 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment F
137
2 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment F
138
3 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

Attachment F
139
4 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Attachment F
140
5 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment F
141
6 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment F
142
7 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment F
143
Attachment F 144
Attachment F 145
Attachment F 146
Attachment F 147
Attachment F 148
Attachment F 149
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment F 150

CITY OF STOCKTON

STANDARD AGREEMENT

1. This Agreement is entered into between the City of Stockton ("City") and I Agreement Number:

RSC Capital Markets, LLC ("Contractor") to provide Financial Underwriter Services as set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

2. The term of this Agreement is as follows, unless amended as described in Exhibit A and Exhibit C section 8:

Commences on: July 1, 2022 Terminates on: June 30, 2027

3. The maximum not to exceed amount to be paid to Contractor for the term of this Agreement, including if authorized, reimbursement of expenses, is: $ I See Exhibit E I

4. The complete Agreement consists of all the following Agreement documents which by reference are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
(a) Exhibit A- Statement of Work
(b) Exhibit B - Insurance
(c) Exhibit C - General Terms & Conditions
(d) Exhibit D - Professional Services Special Terms & Conditions (e) Exhibit E - Compensation Schedule
(f) Exhibit F - Timeline
(g) Exhibit G - Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA (Ir applicable check box)YES D IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized parties have executed this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR
, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.):
04/19/2022
Authorized gnature Date
Bob Williams, Managing Director
Printed Name and Title of Person Signing
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA 94111 Address
Harry Black, City Manager
ATTEST:

Eliza R. Garza CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY OF STOCKTON
Lori M. Asuncion, Acting City Attorney
BY:
1 (Rev. 3 .22.22I
Date
Attachment G 151
Attachment G 152
Attachment G 153
Attachment G 154
Attachment G 155
Attachment G 156
Attachment G 157
1 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment G
158
2 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment G
159
3 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

Attachment G
160
4 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Attachment G
161
5 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment G
162
6 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment G
163
7 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment G
164
Attachment G 165
Attachment G 166
Attachment G 167
Attachment G 168
Attachment G 169
Attachment G 170
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment G 171
172
Attachment H
173
Attachment H
174
Attachment H
175
Attachment H
176
Attachment H
177
Attachment H
178
1 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment H
179
2 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment H
180
3 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

Attachment H
181
4 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Attachment H
182
5 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment H
183
6 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment H
184
7 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment H
185
Attachment H
186
Attachment H
187
Attachment H
188
Attachment H
189
Attachment H
190
Attachment H
191
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment H 192
Attachment I

CITY OF STOCKTON
STANDARD AGREEMENT I Agreement Number:

1. This Agreement is entered Into between the City of Stockton ("City"} and Wells Fargo Bank, NA (''Contractor") to provide Financial Underwriter Services as set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

2. The term of this Agreement is as follows, unless amended as described in Exhibit A and Exhibit C section 8:

Commences on: July 1, 2022 Terminates on: June 30, 2027

3. The maximum not to exceed amount to be paid to Contractor for the term of this Agreement, including if authorized, reimbursement of expenses, Is: $ !See Exhibit E I

4. The complete Agreement consists of all the following Agreement documents which by reference are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
(a) Exhibit A- Statement of Work
(b) Exhibit B - Insurance
(c) Exhibit C- General Terms & Conditions
(d) Exhibit D- Professional Services Special Terms & Conditions (e) Exhibit E - Compensation Schedule
(f) Exhibit F - Timellne
(g) Exhibit G • Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA (If applicable check box)YES D IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized parties have executed this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Contractor's Name (if other than an Individual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.):

C,i,,i;., (?1;.1r,... 4/15/2022
Authorized Signature
Chintan P. Dholakia, Vice President
Printed Name and Title of Person Signing
550 California Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104 Address
Harry Black, City Manager
ATTEST:

Eliza R. Garza CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY OF STOCKTON
Lori M. Asuncion, Acting City Attorney
BY:
1 (Rev, 3,22,22)
Date
Date
193
Attachment I 194
Attachment I 195
Attachment I 196
Attachment I 197
Attachment I 198
Attachment I 199
1 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.

5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree Attachment I
200
2 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.

8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.

9. Contractor’s Status.

It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.

9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's Attachment I
201
3 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

10. Subcontractor.

10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.

11. Termination.

Attachment I
202
4 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are separate and distinct obligations. The indemnification obligations of this section shall survive the termination of this agreement.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Attachment I
203
5 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.

Attachment I
204
6 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.

28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.

Attachment I
205
7 (Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 10.28.20 SG)

29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.

30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.

31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.

33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Attachment I
206
Attachment I 207
Attachment I 208
Attachment I 209
Attachment I 210
Attachment I 211
Attachment I 212
(Rev, 10.30.18)

EXHIBIT G
Special Funding Terms & Conditions ARPA
Not Applicable

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Attachment I 213
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0301, Version: 1
ACCEPT THE QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2022

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept by motion the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.

Summary
Pursuant to California Government Code section 53646 and the City’s Investment Policy (Policy No.

17.01.030), the City Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) is required to provide a quarterly report and certification to the City Council, City Manager, and City Auditor. The Quarterly Investment Report shall include a complete description of the portfolio, the type of investments, the issuers, maturity dates, par value, and dollar amounts invested in all securities, investments, or programs that are under the management of contracted parties, including lending programs. The certification must provide assurances that investments were made consistent with the City’s Investment Policy and that the City will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months.

The Quarterly Investment Report and Certification for the quarter ending March 31, 2022, are provided as required (Attachments A and B). This report is presented as required and will bring the City current on its reporting requirements. The report has also been posted to the City’s website:
<http://www.stocktongov.com/government/departments/adminServices/finInv.html> The City’s consolidated investment portfolio (market value) was approximately $808 million as of March 31, 2022; this includes the City’s liquidity position, short-term investments and the reserve portfolio (as shown on page 14, Attachment A). The total market value-based earnings for the most recent quarter were ($18,156,387), or -2.25 percent. The market value-based earnings are comprised of interest earned of $1,800,608, a market value decrease of $20,017,871, and the City’s liquid portfolio earnings of $60,876, for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.

DISCUSSION
Background
To comply with state law and city policy, the City is required to present quarterly investment reports detailing the City’s investment portfolio to the City Council, City Manager, and City Auditor. The City also posts monthly transaction reports to the City’s website. The authority of the Council to invest, reinvest funds, sell or exchange securities is delegated to the City’s Chief Financial Officer, who also serves as City Treasurer (Resolution #2021-06-22-1602). Pursuant to the Investment Policy, the City Treasurer may and does delegate some fiduciary responsibility to an outside investment management firm. An investment manager’s fiduciary responsibility is a legal requirement related City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
214
File #: 22-0301, Version: 1
to registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisor Act of 1940.

Due to the specialized services and expertise required to assist the City in the varied investment options available, the City contracted with an experienced investment manager, PFM Asset Management LLC (PFM).

Present Situation
The attached report (Attachment A) details the activities of the quarter ended March 31, 2022, and includes detailed information on the holdings of the City’s portfolio on that date. It consists of a certification (Attachment B) that the assets comply with the requirements of State law and City policy and that there is sufficient liquidity to cover the subsequent six months of budgeted activities.

The attached quarterly investment report has been published online along with monthly reports:
<http://www.stocktongov.com/government/departments/adminServices/finInv.html> Portfolio Balances and Performance
The City divides its investment portfolio into Reserve and Liquid portions with a consolidated market value of approximately $808 million as of March 31, 2022. The Reserve portion represents the longterm assets managed by PFM Asset management and the Liquid part represents funds invested in several accounts (State of California Local Agency Investment Fund, California Asset Management Program, Dreyfus Treasury Money Market) to maintain adequate liquidity and optimize returns. The total returns on the consolidated portfolio for the first quarter of the fiscal year were ($18,156,387) or -

2.25%, which includes the change in market value for the reserve portfolio, interest income, (Attachment A, page 26), and the liquid portfolio’s earnings of $60,876. The market value changes in the City’s portfolio are not realized losses. The reduced market value is attributable to the rising interest rate environment, and we will likely continue to see the impacts of that in the portfolio.

However, to minimize realized losses from the interest rate changes, City staff works closely with our investment advisors to ensure that securities in our portfolio, are held until maturity, only trading them when doing so involves minimal realized losses, and better positions the portfolio to lock-in future realized gains. The quarterly return valuation includes funds from all activities, restricted and unrestricted, and includes changes in fair market value (unrealized gains/losses). The return is not netted with the expenses of the pool.

The performance of the reserve portion of the portfolio managed by PFM through March 31, 2022, is benchmarked against the Bank of America Merrill Lynch index of 1-5-year government and U.S. issued corporate securities rated A- or better. The benchmark generally reflects the portfolio’s strategy and composition. City staff works closely with PFM to monitor the status of the City’s investment portfolio and its returns. Over the last quarter, the reserve portion of the City’s portfolio outperformed the performance of the benchmark by 0.14%. For the year, the City’s portfolio return was -3.59%, but with the differing composition (described above), outperformed the benchmark by

0.11% (Attachment A, page 26).

During the quarter, as investors revised their expectations for inflation and Federal Open Market Committee interest rate hikes, yields across the curve surged, volatility increased, and credit spreads City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
215
File #: 22-0301, Version: 1
widened. The Fed’s tightening cycle began with an initial rate hike of 25 basis points (0.25%) in midMarch, while Russia’s invasion of Ukraine increased geopolitical uncertainty. Outperformance relative to the benchmark was due to the portfolio’s shorter average maturity (more defensive duration position). Additionally, the portfolio’s diversification benefited the portfolio’s performance relative to the benchmark. While rising interest rates and widening spreads impacted the market values of the portfolio’s current investments, it also created opportunities to add new securities to the portfolio at substantially higher yields. The portfolio has also added, for the first time, positions in the 5-10 year maturity range, locking in yields above 2.00% over a longer time period. The allocation to this maturity range may continue to grow as yields rise.

The City’s investment portfolio complies with California Government Code 53601. It is invested solely in fixed-income securities (no stock holdings) that, while earning certain rates of interest, gain in market value when interest rates fall and lose market value when interest rates rise. The portfolio’s earnings on a market value basis were negative, as unrealized market value losses due to rising rates were greater than realized earnings. The reserve portfolio yield at cost is 1.15% (Attachment A, page 20) while realizing $1,541,877 of earnings during the quarter (Attachment A, page 27) on an amortized cost basis (this excludes unrealized gains/losses).

While the economic recovery continues on a positive track, several risk factors loom, including high inflation, Fed policy uncertainty, the Russian-Ukraine war, and the ever-present risk of a Covid resurgence. On the economic front, consumer balance sheets remain strong, but sentiment is surprisingly weak. The labor market is very strong, but unfilled jobs are holding back the expansion and supply chain recovery. Inflation remains problematic, but outside of some commodity prices (e.g. energy, wheat, aluminum), should begin to moderate over the balance of 2022. At quarter-end, expectations had risen for one or two 50 basis point (0.50%) Fed rate increases, and a total of 200 to 250 basis point (2%-2.5%) of increases for the year.

While rising interest rates will continue to dampen market values and total return performance, continued reinvestment into the higher yielding environment will increase the City’s interest earnings going forward.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
There is no financial impact related to the presentation of these reports.

Attachment A - Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended 3-31-2022 Attachment B - Certification of Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended 3-31-2022 City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
216
Investment Performance Review
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Client Management Team PFM Asset Management LLC
Monique Spyke, Managing Director
Allison Kaune, Senior Analyst
Joseph Creason, Portfolio ManagerRachael Miller, Client Consultant 213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141
717-232-2723
1 California Street Ste 1000
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-393-7270
NOT FDIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE
For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only - This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public

CITY OF STOCKTON

ATTACHMENT A
217
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Market Update

ATTACHMENT A
218
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
▸ Invasion of Ukraine impacted the economic landscape
▹ Commodity prices soared, especially energy▹ Created significant geopolitical uncertainty▹ Triggered market volatility ▸ The U.S. economy is characterized by:
▹ A strong labor market ▹ Inflation at a 40-year high▹ Depressed consumer confidence ▸ The Federal Reserve is tightening monetary policy
▹ Initiated the first of what will be many rate hikes in 2022 ▹ Balance sheet reduction likely to start soon ▸ U.S. Treasury yield curve has partially inverted
▹ Yield on 2-year Treasury notes rose above the 10-year Treasury▹ One early, but imperfect warning sign for a future recession Current Market Themes

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
1 ATTACHMENT A
219
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3/31/2022.*Shading is based of economic data from 2/28/2012 – 2/28/2022.

Economic Conditions Are Mixed
Best Worst
Prices
1/20
2/20
3/20
4/20
5/20
6/20
7/20
8/20
9/20
10/20
11/20
12/20
1/21
2/21
3/21
4/21
5/21
6/21
7/21
8/21
9/21
10/21
11/21
12/21
1/22
2/22
CPI YoYConfidence
U. Of Mich. SentimentManufacturingISM ManufacturingLaborUnemployment RateRetailRetail Sales MoMHousingExisting Home SalesNew Home Sales

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
2 ATTACHMENT A
220
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC); as of March 2022.Data is based on 2020 exports.

Global Production Share
of Top 5 Exports
Crude Petroleum 11%
Refined Petroleum 10%
Petroleum Gas 9%Gold 4%Coal Briquettes 15%
Top 5 Trading Partners
China 15%United Kingdom 8%
Netherlands 7%Belarus 5%Germany 4%
Global Production Share
of Top 5 Exports
Seed Oils 39%
Corn 12%
Wheat 9%Iron Ore 3%Semi-Finished Iron 12%
Top 5 Trading Partners
China 14%
Poland 6%
Russia 6%Turkey 5%Egypt 4%
Russia (12th largest) Ukraine (58th largest)
Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Impacts Global Commodity Markets, But Has Limited Impact on U.S. Economy

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
3 ATTACHMENT A
221
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities Market Update Invasion Has Put Additional Pressure on Supply Chains and Commodity Prices

CLIENT NAME
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
Energy Agriculture Industrial Metals
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3/31/2022.
$4$6$8
$10$12$14$16$18
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Soybean (per bushel)
$0
$20$40$60$80
$100$120
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
WTI Crude Oil (per barrel)
$2$4$6$8
$10$12$14$16
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Wheat (per bushel)
$1.00$1.50$2.00$2.50$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Retail Gasoline (per gallon)
$2.00$2.50$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50$5.00$5.50
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Copper (per lb.)
$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Aluminum (per metric ton)
YTD: +33%
YTD: +29%
YTD: +31% YTD: +7%
YTD: +22%
YTD: +24%

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
4 ATTACHMENT A
222
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: BLS. Gov, data as of February 2022.

CPI Categories
 Commodities Services Energy Food
Majority of
components are above
the Fed’s 2% average CPI target
2% Fed Inflation
Target
Index Weighting
Size of bubbles
represent contribution to headline CPI
Food
Gasoline and
Fuel Oil
Energy Services
New Vehicles
Used Cars
and Trucks
Apparel,
Medical Care,
Alcohol, and
Others
Shelter Medical Care, Transportation
and Others
0%
10%20%30%40%50%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Year-over-Year Inflation
CPI Components
Inflation is Prevalent Throughout the Economy

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
5 ATTACHMENT A
223
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com

2.6%

5.4% 5.4%

7.0%

7.9%1
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%
10%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Consumer Price Index
% Change YoY
Mar 2021

6.0%

0.16%
0 Jun 2021

5.9%

0.25%
0 Sept 2021

4.7%

0.28%
0 Dec 2021

3.9%

0.73%
3 Mar 2022

3.6%

2.34%
7 Indicators
Unemployment Rate2-Year Treasury Yield1
Fed Projections
# of 2022 Rate Hikes2
“…the Committee will aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2 percent for some time…” 3
“Inflation is elevated, largely reflecting transitory factors.” “Inflation remains elevated, reflecting supply and demand imbalances… higher energy prices, and broader price pressures.”
Federal Reserve Policy Has Lagged Surging Inflation
Source: Bloomberg, data as of 4/01/2022.1. March’s CPI is assumed to remain unchanged from February’s CPI reading of 7.9%; Treasury yields are as of month-end.

2. Calculated using the 2022 median Federal Funds rate from the FOMC Summary of Economic Projections. Assumes 0.25% rate hikes.3. Quotes are sourced directly from FOMC press release statements.

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
6 ATTACHMENT A
224
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3/31/2022.

Treasury Yield Curve Partially Inverted; Sharp Rise in Yields Has Negatively Impacted Returns

0.48%

2.33%

2.46%

2.34% 2.45%

0.00%0.50%

1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%
3 M
1 Y
2 Y
3 Y
4 Y
5 Y
10 Y
30 Y
Maturity
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
-0.80%
-2.34%
-3.16%
-4.02%
-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%

0.00%1.00%
1 Year
1 - 3 Year
1 - 5 Year
1 - 10 Year
U.S. Treasury Returns – Q1 2022
Rising yields in Q1
negatively affected bond returns

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
7 ATTACHMENT A
225
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3/31/2022.

Worst Performance in Over 40 Years
0 102030405060
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
13%
Frequency
Distribution of Quarterly Returns
(3/31/78 - 3/31/22)
2022 Q1
Return
-3.16%
-4%-2%
0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%
Mar-78
Mar-89
Mar-00
Mar-11
Mar-22
Quarterly Performance
(3/31/78 - 3/31/22)
Median 1.09%
ICE BofA 1-5 Year Treasury Index

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
8 ATTACHMENT A
226
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source (graph): Bloomberg, data as of 3/31/2022. Source (table): ICE BofAML Indices, data as of 3/31/2022.

Performance Has Historically Suffered as the Fed Raised Rates

0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
3-Year Treasury Yield
Annual Returns of the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year Treasury Index 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 YTD

0.91% -0.19% 1.24% 0.98% 1.09% 0.65% 1.52% 4.20% 4.25% -1.10% -3.16%

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
9 ATTACHMENT A
227
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Sector Yield Spreads Have Widened in Q1 2022
Source: ICE BofAML 1-5 year Indices via Bloomberg, MarketAxess and PFM as of 3/31/2022. Spreads on ABS and MBS are option-adjusted spreads of 0-5 year indices based on weighted average life; spreads on agencies are relative to comparable maturity Treasuries. CMBS is Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities.

0.2%0.3%0.4%0.5%0.6%0.7%0.8%0.9%1.0%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Corporate Notes A-AAA Yield Spreads
-0.10%-0.05%

0.00%0.05%0.10%0.15%0.20%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Federal Agency Yield Spreads
-0.50%

0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Mortgage-Backed Securities Yield Spreads
Agency MBS AAA CMBS Index

0.2%0.3%0.4%0.5%0.6%0.7%0.8%0.9%1.0%
Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22
Asset-Backed Securities AAA Yield Spreads

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
10 ATTACHMENT A
228
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Source: ICE BofAML Indices. ABS indices are 0-5 year, based on weighted average life. As of 3/31/2022.

Rising Rates and Wider Spreads Hurt Fixed-Income Returns in Q1 1-5 Year Indices
-3.16% -3.08%
-1.81%
-3.62%
-4.80%
-7.0%-6.0%-5.0%-4.0%-3.0%-2.0%-1.0%

0.0%
U.S. Treasury
Agency
ABS
Corp A-AAA
Corp BBB
Q1 2022

1.04% 1.01%

1.35%

2.10%

2.71%

0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%
U.S. Treasury
Agency
ABS
Corp A-AAA
Corp BBB
10 Year Average

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
11 ATTACHMENT A
229
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities CLIENT NAME Market Update For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC | pfmam.com
Fixed-Income Sector Commentary — 1Q 2022
▸ U.S. Treasury securities generated negative
performance as the market repriced for an aggressive Fed rate hike cycle, pushing yields higher across all maturities. By quarter-end, 2-year Treasury yields rose to 2.34%, the highest level since April 2019. ▸ Federal agency sector remained unattractive given
the historically tight yield spreads and minimal pickup vs. Treasuries. While volatility pushed spreads wider on callable structures, the rising rate environment was not favorable for taking on increased optionality risk. ▸ Supranational spreads remained tight, and supply
was limited as issuance lagged projections. New issue opportunities, while sporadic, remained the best entry point. ▸ Corporate credit spreads widened through the
quarter, driven by rising global tensions and a less certain macro-economic environment. Yield spreads reached the widest levels since 2019 despite stableto-strong fundamentals. ▸ Asset-Backed AAA-rated auto and credit card yield
spreads increased toward 18-month wides. ABS offered relative value compared to corporates as spreads between the two widened during the quarter. ▸ Mortgage-Backed Securities continued to
underperform. Prepayments experienced a material slowdown as rates rose, which lengthened durations and compounded the negative impact. The Federal Reserve is poised to begin reducing their MBS holdings, so weakness in the sector could persist. CMBS valuations remained below historical averages relative to Treasuries as spreads remained tight. ▸ Taxable Municipal securities deals remain heavily
oversubscribed. Valuations remained stretched which warrants some selectively in the sector. ▸ Commercial Paper and CDs saw significant
repricing to higher yields, especially on maturities greater than six months as issuers sought longer-term funding in response to Fed rate hike expectations.

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Market Update
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
12 ATTACHMENT A
230
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Account Summary

ATTACHMENT A
231
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Account Summary
|
Account Summary
Total Program $807,760,644
Consolidated Summary
Sector Allocation

25.7%

0.8% 3.8% 2.6% 1.7%

16.5% 18.6%

27.1%

2.7% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0%
$0
$50
$100$150$200$250$300
Millions
Under
30 days
31 to 60
days
61 to 90
days
91 to
180
days
181
days to
1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
5 to 7 years
7 to 10
years
Over 10
years
Maturity Distribution
(Weighted Average Maturity: 674 Days)

1.PFMAM Managed Account balance includes market values, accrued interest, cash and cash equivalents. Sector allocation and the maturity distribution include market values and accrued interest. $605,611,465
$127,067,296
$81,883
PFMAM Managed AccountBoW Main Account CAMP Pool Local Agency Investment $75,000,000 U.S. Treasury | 40%Federal Agency | 24%Corporate | 17%Negotiable CD | 5%Commercial Paper | 5% ABS | 3%
Municipal | 3%Supranational | 2%
Agency CMBS | 1%
14 ATTACHMENT A
232
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Account Summary
|
Account Summary

1. Yield at market, yield on cost, and portfolio duration only include investments held within the separately managed account(s), excludes balances invested in overnight funds.

CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO
Portfolio Values March 31, 2022PFMAM Managed Account $573,413,559 Amortized Cost $594,241,943
Market Value $573,413,559
Accrued Interest $1,550,448
Cash $707,968
Analytics¹ March 31, 2022Yield at Market 2.35%
Yield on Cost 1.15%Portfolio Duration 2.44

CITY OF STOCKTON SHORT-TERM PORTFOLIO
Portfolio Values March 31, 2022
$29,939,490$29,955,458$29,939,490
$0
PFMAM Managed Account
Amortized Cost
Market Value
Accrued Interest
Cash $0
Analytics¹ March 31, 2022

0.93%0.70%
Yield at MarketYield on CostPortfolio Duration 0.22
15 ATTACHMENT A
233
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Account Summary
|
Ratings shown are calculated by assigning a numeral value to each security rating, then calculating a weighted average rating for each security type / issuer category using all available security ratings,excluding Not-Rated (NR) ratings. For security type / issuer categories where a rating from the applicable NRSRO is not available, a rating of NR is assigned. Includes accrued interest and excludes balancesinvested in overnight funds.

Issuer Diversification
Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchU.S. Treasury 39.7% UNITED STATES TREASURY 39.7% AA / Aaa / AAA
Federal Agency 24.3%
FANNIE MAE 16.3% AA / Aaa / AAA
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 0.9% AA / Aaa / AAAFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1.3% AA / Aaa / NRFREDDIE MAC 5.7% AA / Aaa / AAA Agency CMBS 1.2%
FANNIE MAE 0.4% AA / Aaa / AAA
FREDDIE MAC 0.8% AA / Aaa / AAA
Supranational 1.9%
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 1.3% AAA / Aaa / AAA
INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV 0.6% AAA / Aaa / AAA Municipal 2.7%

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATERRESOURCES

0.0% AAA / Aa / NR
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY 0.2% AA / Aa / NRFLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMIN FIN CORP 0.6% AA / Aa / AALOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGEDISTRICT

0.3% AA / Aaa / NR
NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY 0.2% AA / A / ASAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 0.2% AAA / Aaa / NRSTATE OF CALIFORNIA 0.7% AA / Aa / AASTATE OF MARYLAND 0.2% AAA / Aaa / AAAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 0.2% AA / Aa / AA Negotiable CD 5.1%
BARCLAYS PLC 1.0% A / Aa / A
CREDIT SUISSE GROUP RK 0.7% A / Aa / A
Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchNegotiable CD 5.1% DNB ASA 0.6% AA / Aa / NRNORDEA BANK ABP 1.0% AA / Aa / AASKANDINAVISKA ENSKILDA BANKEN AB 1.2% A / Aa / AASUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP INC 0.6% A / Aa / A Commercial Paper 4.9%
LMA AMERICAS LLC 1.6% A / Aa / AA
MANHATTAN ASSET FUNDING CO LLC 1.7% A / Aa / NROLD LINE FUNDING LLC 1.6% AA / Aa / AA Corporate 17.4%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.5% AA / A / AAAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 0.6% A / A / AAPPLE INC 0.0% AA / Aaa / NR BANK OF AMERICA CO 1.2% A / A / AA
CITIGROUP INC 0.4% BBB / A / ADEERE & COMPANY 0.8% A / A / AGOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.6% BBB / A / AHOME DEPOT INC 0.3% A / A / AHONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL 0.6% A / A / AINTEL CORPORATION 0.7% A / A / AJP MORGAN CHASE & CO 1.0% A / A / AAMASTERCARD INC 0.7% A / A / NRMERCK & CO INC 0.8% A / A / AMICROSOFT CORP 0.9% AAA / Aaa / AAAMORGAN STANLEY 0.4% BBB / A / ANOVARTIS AG 1.2% AA / A / AAPACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 0.1% A / A / NR 16 ATTACHMENT A
234
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

Issuer Diversification
Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchCorporate 17.4% PFIZER INC 1.1% A / A / A
STATE STREET CORPORATION 0.1% A / A / AATARGET CORP 0.7% A / A / ATHE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLONCORPORATION

1.1% A / A / AA
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 0.6% A / A / AUNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 0.7% A / A / NRUS BANCORP 0.9% A / A / AWAL-MART STORES INC 1.4% AA / Aa / AA ABS 2.7%
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 0.0% AAA / Aaa / AAA
CARMAX AUTO OWNER TRUST 0.7% AAA / NR / AAADISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES 0.3% AAA / Aaa / NRHONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES 0.3% AAA / Aaa / AAAHYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES 0.4% AAA / NR / AAANISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES 0.3% AAA / Aaa / AAATOYOTA MOTOR CORP 0.7% AAA / Aaa / NR Total 100.0%
17 ATTACHMENT A
235
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Compliance
|
Note: Pre- and post-trade compliance for the account(s) managed by PFM Asset Management is provided via Bloomberg Asset and Investment Management ("AIM").

Certificate of Compliance
During the reporting period for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, the account(s) managed by PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") were in compliance with the applicable investment policy and guidelines as furnished to PFMAM.

Acknowledged : PFM Asset Management LLC
18 ATTACHMENT A
236
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Portfolio Review:

CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO

ATTACHMENT A
237
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Snapshot
|
Yield and duration calculations exclude cash and cash equivalents. Sector allocation includes market values and accrued interests.The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year U.S. Government/Corp A or Better, U.S. issuers only Index. Source: Bloomberg.

An average of each security’s credit rating was assigned a numeric value and adjusted for its relative weighting in the portfolio.

1. Portfolio Snapshot - CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO¹ Credit Quality - S&P
10%
29%
21%
37%
3% 0% 1% 5%
33%
28%
20%
14%
0% 0%
0%
10%20%30%40%
0-1 Yr 1-2 Yrs 2-3 Yrs 3-4 Yrs 4-5 Yrs 5-6 Yrs 6-7 Yrs
Portfolio Benchmark
Duration Distribution
U.S. Treasury | 42%Federal Agency | 26%Corporate | 18%Negotiable CD | 5% ABS | 3%
Municipal | 3%Supranational | 2%
Agency CMBS | 1%
Sector Allocation
AAA | 6%AA+ | 69%AA | 3%AA- | 2%A-1+ | 2%A+ | 5%A | 4%A- | 4%A-1 | 4% BBB+ | 2%Not Rated | 1%
Portfolio Statistics
Portfolio Effective Duration 2.44 years
Benchmark Effective Duration 2.55 yearsPortfolio Credit Quality AA Yield At Market 2.35%
Yield At Cost 1.15%
Total Market Value $575,671,974.68
Securities Sub-Total $573,413,558.91Cash $707,967.54
Accrued Interest $1,550,448.23
20 ATTACHMENT A
238
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Summary
|
Ratings shown are calculated by assigning a numeral value to each security rating, then calculating a weighted average rating for each security type / issuer category using all available security ratings,excluding Not-Rated (NR) ratings. For security type / issuer categories where a rating from the applicable NRSRO is not available, a rating of NR is assigned. Includes accrued interest and excludes balancesinvested in overnight funds.

Issuer Diversification - CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchU.S. Treasury 41.8% UNITED STATES TREASURY 41.8% AA / Aaa / AAA
Federal Agency 25.6%
FANNIE MAE 17.1% AA / Aaa / AAAFEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 1.0% AA / Aaa / AAAFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1.4% AA / Aaa / NRFREDDIE MAC 6.0% AA / Aaa / AAA Agency CMBS 1.3%
FANNIE MAE 0.4% AA / Aaa / AAAFREDDIE MAC 0.8% AA / Aaa / AAA Supranational 2.0%
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 1.4% AAA / Aaa / AAAINTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV 0.6% AAA / Aaa / AAA Municipal 2.8%

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATERRESOURCES

0.0% AAA / Aa / NR
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY 0.2% AA / Aa / NRFLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMIN FIN CORP 0.6% AA / Aa / AALOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGEDISTRICT

0.3% AA / Aaa / NR
NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY 0.2% AA / A / ASAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 0.2% AAA / Aaa / NRSTATE OF CALIFORNIA 0.8% AA / Aa / AASTATE OF MARYLAND 0.2% AAA / Aaa / AAAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 0.3% AA / Aa / AA Negotiable CD 5.4%
BARCLAYS PLC 1.0% A / Aa / A
Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchNegotiable CD 5.4% CREDIT SUISSE GROUP RK 0.7% A / Aa / ADNB ASA 0.6% AA / Aa / NRNORDEA BANK ABP 1.1% AA / Aa / AASKANDINAVISKA ENSKILDA BANKEN AB 1.3% A / Aa / AASUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP INC 0.7% A / Aa / A Corporate 18.4%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.5% AA / A / AAAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 0.6% A / A / AAPPLE INC 0.0% AA / Aaa / NR BANK OF AMERICA CO 1.3% A / A / AA
CITIGROUP INC 0.5% BBB / A / ADEERE & COMPANY 0.8% A / A / AGOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.7% BBB / A / AHOME DEPOT INC 0.4% A / A / AHONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL 0.7% A / A / AINTEL CORPORATION 0.7% A / A / AJP MORGAN CHASE & CO 1.1% A / A / AAMASTERCARD INC 0.8% A / A / NRMERCK & CO INC 0.8% A / A / AMICROSOFT CORP 0.9% AAA / Aaa / AAAMORGAN STANLEY 0.5% BBB / A / ANOVARTIS AG 1.3% AA / A / AAPACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 0.1% A / A / NRPFIZER INC 1.1% A / A / ASTATE STREET CORPORATION 0.1% A / A / AATARGET CORP 0.7% A / A / A 21 ATTACHMENT A
239
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

Issuer Diversification - CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchCorporate 18.4%

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLONCORPORATION

1.2% A / A / AA
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 0.6% A / A / AUNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 0.7% A / A / NRUS BANCORP 0.9% A / A / AWAL-MART STORES INC 1.4% AA / Aa / AA ABS 2.9%
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 0.0% AAA / Aaa / AAACARMAX AUTO OWNER TRUST 0.7% AAA / NR / AAADISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES 0.3% AAA / Aaa / NRHONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES 0.4% AAA / Aaa / AAAHYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES 0.4% AAA / NR / AAANISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES 0.3% AAA / Aaa / AAATOYOTA MOTOR CORP 0.7% AAA / Aaa / NR Total 100.0%
22 ATTACHMENT A
240
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Characteristics
|
$0
$118
$236$354$472$590
March 2022
$0
$118
$236$354$472$590
December 2021
$0
$118
$236$354$472$590
September 2021
$0.0
$118.0
$236.0$354.0$472.0$590.0
Millions
June 2021
Sector Allocation Review - CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO U.S. Treasury Federal Agency Agency CMBS Supranational Municipal Negotiable CD Corporate ABS Market values, including accrued interest. Only includes investments held within the separately managed account(s), excludes cash held in funds not managed by PFMAM. Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Security Type Jun-21 % of Total Sep-21 % of Total Dec-21 % of Total Mar-22 % of Total U.S. Treasury $164.2 30.5% $202.3 35.5% $244.5 41.4% $239.5 41.7%Federal Agency $176.2 32.6% $168.5 29.6% $160.0 27.2% $146.7 25.6% Agency CMBS $13.9 2.6% $12.6 2.2% $8.4 1.4% $7.2 1.3%
Supranational $3.7 0.7% $12.1 2.1% $12.0 2.0% $11.6 2.0%Municipal $17.2 3.2% $17.1 3.0% $16.9 2.9% $16.2 2.8%Negotiable CD $30.2 5.6% $25.3 4.4% $25.1 4.3% $30.8 5.4%Corporate $111.8 20.7% $109.8 19.3% $102.5 17.4% $105.0 18.3% ABS $22.0 4.1% $22.1 3.9% $19.8 3.4% $16.4 2.9%
Total $539.2 100.0% $569.9 100.0% $589.3 100.0% $573.4 100.0% 23 ATTACHMENT A
241
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Portfolio Activity - CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO Net Activity by Sector
($ millions)
Federal Agency
ABS
Agency CMBS
U.S. Treasury
Corporate
Negotiable CD
Federal Agency
ABS
Agency CMBS
U.S. Treasury
Corporate
Negotiable CD
($40.0) ($20.0) $0.0 $20.0 $40.0
Based on total proceeds (principal and accrued interest) of buys, sells, maturities, and principal paydowns. Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Sector Net ActivityNegotiable CD $5,885,000Corporate $5,585,602U.S. Treasury $4,917,870 Agency CMBS ($1,095,338)ABS ($3,085,418)
Federal Agency ($8,193,591)Total Net Activity $4,014,125 Sales/Maturities Purchases
24 ATTACHMENT A
242
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Performance
|

1. Performance on trade-date basis, gross (i.e., before fees), in accordance with the CFA Institute’s Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS).2. Income returns calculated as interest earned on investments during the period.3. Price returns calculated as the change in market value of each security for the period.4. Returns are presented on a periodic basis.

Total Return by Sector Contribution to Total Return
Cash
ABS
Corporate
Negotiable CD
Municipal
Supranational
Agency CMBS
Federal Agency
U.S. Treasury
-3.50%-3.00%-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%

0.01%

0.29%

0.55%

0.36%0.36%

0.11%

0.72%

0.19%

0.27%

0.00%
-1.56%
-3.04%
-0.89%
-4.22%
-3.18%
-1.48%
-3.27%
-4.03% -6.0% -4.0% -2.0% 0.00% 2.0% 4.0%
Return
Quarterly Sector Performance - CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO 25 ATTACHMENT A
243
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Performance
|

1. The lesser of 10 years or since inception is shown. Since inception returns for periods one year or less are not shown. Performance inception date is June 30, 2017.2. Interest earned calculated as the ending accrued interest less beginning accrued interest, plus net interest activity.3. Returns for periods one year or less are presented on a periodic basis. Returns for periods greater than one year are presented on an annualized basis.4. The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year U.S. Government/Corp A or Better, U.S. issuers only Index. Source: Bloomberg. -4.0%-2.0%

0.0%2.0%
Return
Portfolio Benchmark Net of Fees
Portfolio Performance - CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO Market Value Basis Earnings 3 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Since Inception¹ Interest Earned² $1,800,608 $7,700,136 $27,933,536 - $40,860,016 Change in Market Value ($20,017,871) ($29,358,877) ($15,410,838) - ($14,646,589) Total Dollar Return ($18,217,263) ($21,658,741) $12,522,698 - $26,213,427Total Return³ Portfolio -3.06% -3.59% 1.14% - 1.39%Benchmark⁴ -3.20% -3.70% 0.99% - 1.22%Basis Point Fee 0.01% 0.06% 0.06% - 0.05%Net of Fee Return -3.07% -3.64% 1.09% - 1.34% 3 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Since Inception
26 ATTACHMENT A
244
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Performance
|

1. The lesser of 10 years or since inception is shown. Performance inception date is June 30, 2017.2. Interest earned calculated as the ending accrued interest less beginning accrued interest, plus net interest activity.3. Realized gains / (losses) are shown on an amortized cost basis.

Accrual Basis Earnings - CITY OF STOCKTON RESERVE PORTFOLIO Accrual Basis EarningsInterest Earned²Realized Gains / (Losses)³Change in Amortized CostTotal Earnings 3 Months
$1,800,608
($75,540)
($183,192)
$1,541,877
1 Year
$7,700,136$1,067,413
($955,443)
$7,812,106
3 Years
$27,933,536
$7,719,519
($1,427,899)
$34,225,156
5 Year---- Since Inception¹ $40,860,016 $5,471,597 $432,326 $46,763,939 27 ATTACHMENT A
245
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
U.S. Treasury
US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/01/2016 1.250% 07/31/2023
912828S92 2,375,000.00 AA+ Aaa 4/2/2019 4/4/2019 2,274,433.59 2.28 4,920.58 2,344,046.69 2,349,765.63 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/01/2016 1.250% 07/31/2023
912828S92 1,090,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/8/2019 2/12/2019 1,035,457.42 2.44 2,258.29 1,073,737.61 1,078,418.75 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 09/30/2016 1.375% 09/30/2023
912828T26 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/7/2019 8/8/2019 4,983,007.81 1.46 187.84 4,993,860.81 4,944,531.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 11/15/2020 0.250% 11/15/2023
91282CAW1 3,145,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/4/2021 10/6/2021 3,141,560.16 0.30 2,975.59 3,142,350.88 3,047,210.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 11/15/2013 2.750% 11/15/2023
912828WE6 10,925,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/6/2019 3/8/2019 11,035,530.27 2.52 113,701.48 10,963,262.96 11,015,472.11 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 11/30/2016 2.125% 11/30/2023
912828U57 8,515,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/7/2019 1/9/2019 8,362,661.33 2.52 60,645.98 8,463,140.03 8,501,695.31 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 12/31/2018 2.625% 12/31/2023
9128285U0 460,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/30/2019 1/31/2019 461,365.62 2.56 3,035.43 460,486.15 462,803.15 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
9128286G0 2,656,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/11/2021 8/12/2021 2,792,846.25 0.35 5,485.22 2,758,744.93 2,658,490.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
9128286G0 763,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/11/2021 8/12/2021 802,521.02 0.33 1,575.76 792,672.60 763,715.31 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 03/31/2017 2.125% 03/31/2024
912828W71 5,930,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/5/2022 1/6/2022 6,093,075.00 0.88 344.30 6,076,067.18 5,904,982.52 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 04/15/2021 0.375% 04/15/2024
91282CBV2 3,140,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/4/2021 10/6/2021 3,138,282.81 0.40 5,434.62 3,138,612.47 3,015,872.03 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
912828X70 4,515,000.00 AA+ Aaa 6/3/2019 6/5/2019 4,535,458.59 1.90 37,916.02 4,523,681.48 4,479,726.56 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 06/30/2017 2.000% 06/30/2024
912828XX3 11,430,000.00 AA+ Aaa 7/1/2019 7/3/2019 11,547,871.88 1.78 57,465.75 11,483,055.27 11,326,415.63 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 07/31/2017 2.125% 07/31/2024
9128282N9 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/7/2019 8/8/2019 2,578,906.25 1.47 8,805.25 2,536,958.84 2,482,031.25 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 08/15/2021 0.375% 08/15/2024
91282CCT6 6,020,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/19/2021 8/20/2021 6,012,004.69 0.42 2,806.28 6,013,646.26 5,733,109.68 28 ATTACHMENT A
246
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
U.S. Treasury
US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/31/2017 1.875% 08/31/2024
9128282U3 7,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/25/2020 11/27/2020 7,952,050.78 0.26 12,228.26 7,790,721.66 7,395,703.50 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/31/2017 1.875% 08/31/2024
9128282U3 6,775,000.00 AA+ Aaa 9/3/2019 9/5/2019 6,951,520.50 1.33 11,046.20 6,860,547.53 6,680,785.50 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 09/15/2021 0.375% 09/15/2024
91282CCX7 3,155,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/4/2021 10/6/2021 3,143,538.48 0.50 546.55 3,145,425.63 2,997,250.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 10/31/2017 2.250% 10/31/2024
9128283D0 3,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/1/2019 11/5/2019 3,511,164.06 1.57 32,121.55 3,457,595.43 3,379,281.08 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
912828YM6 2,120,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/12/2021 1/13/2021 2,212,087.50 0.35 13,352.49 2,182,675.27 2,067,993.86 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 8,775,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/3/2020 1/7/2020 8,978,264.65 1.63 62,497.77 8,885,665.05 8,687,250.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 2,140,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/2/2019 12/4/2019 2,183,970.31 1.69 15,241.62 2,163,492.64 2,118,600.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 02/29/2020 1.125% 02/28/2025
912828ZC7 5,860,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/19/2021 8/20/2021 5,982,235.94 0.53 5,732.61 5,960,977.52 5,632,925.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 02/29/2020 1.125% 02/28/2025
912828ZC7 3,085,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/4/2021 10/6/2021 3,139,108.01 0.60 3,017.93 3,131,390.75 2,965,456.25 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 04/30/2020 0.375% 04/30/2025
912828ZL7 5,995,000.00 AA+ Aaa 4/5/2021 4/7/2021 5,916,783.98 0.70 9,439.64 5,935,705.51 5,613,755.17 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 06/30/2020 0.250% 06/30/2025
912828ZW3 3,195,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/4/2021 10/6/2021 3,142,207.62 0.70 2,007.91 3,149,063.27 2,968,354.69 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 4,140,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 4,094,071.88 0.53 900.00 4,101,505.51 3,830,793.75 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 5,565,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/17/2021 8/20/2021 5,480,220.70 0.63 1,209.78 5,493,121.90 5,149,364.06 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 6,095,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/19/2021 8/20/2021 6,004,527.34 0.62 1,325.00 6,018,294.92 5,639,779.69 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 1,840,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/2/2021 8/6/2021 1,819,443.75 0.53 400.00 1,822,736.07 1,702,575.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025
91282CAT8 7,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/4/2021 10/6/2021 6,851,796.88 0.78 7,348.07 6,869,449.61 6,453,125.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 11/30/2020 0.375% 11/30/2025
91282CAZ4 3,195,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/4/2021 10/6/2021 3,138,713.09 0.81 4,015.69 3,145,284.85 2,953,378.13 29 ATTACHMENT A
247
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
U.S. Treasury
US TREASURY NOTESDTD 11/30/2020 0.375% 11/30/2025
91282CAZ4 10,350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/1/2021 11/2/2021 10,070,226.56 1.05 13,008.59 10,098,410.59 9,567,281.25 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 5,700,000.00 AA+ Aaa 5/6/2021 5/10/2021 5,606,707.03 0.73 5,373.27 5,624,639.52 5,262,702.84 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 7,100,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/11/2021 1/13/2021 7,059,230.47 0.49 6,693.03 7,069,192.36 6,555,296.52 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 4,075,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/26/2021 2/26/2021 3,990,634.77 0.80 2,532.80 4,009,335.73 3,754,730.26 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 5,425,000.00 AA+ Aaa 4/21/2021 4/22/2021 5,325,824.22 0.77 3,371.89 5,345,375.20 4,998,628.64 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 7,635,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/18/2022 2/22/2022 7,215,969.73 1.83 4,745.51 7,227,035.16 7,034,936.34 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 8,475,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/4/2022 1/6/2022 8,174,402.34 1.27 5,267.61 8,191,596.69 7,808,917.54 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 9,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 7/2/2021 7/7/2021 8,827,031.25 0.80 5,593.92 8,854,805.74 8,292,655.80 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2019 2.625% 01/31/2026
9128286A3 3,415,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/4/2021 2/4/2021 3,780,111.52 0.46 14,858.08 3,695,747.11 3,427,806.25 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 10,690,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/2/2022 2/3/2022 10,249,872.66 1.55 4,647.83 10,266,755.07 9,883,238.53 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 6,035,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/19/2021 8/20/2021 5,981,015.04 0.70 2,623.91 5,988,330.61 5,579,545.79 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 8,615,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/3/2021 12/7/2021 8,382,798.83 1.15 3,745.65 8,400,093.61 7,964,836.29 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 4,060,000.00 AA+ Aaa 6/7/2021 6/7/2021 4,050,801.56 0.80 10,205.77 4,052,308.51 3,775,800.00 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 3,155,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/4/2021 10/6/2021 3,133,186.13 0.90 7,930.84 3,135,460.01 2,934,150.00 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 5,065,000.00 AA+ Aaa 6/2/2021 6/4/2021 5,053,920.32 0.79 12,732.07 5,055,750.72 4,710,450.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 1,080,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/15/2022 996,764.06 2.15 1,342.54 997,422.82 979,425.00 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 09/30/2021 1.250% 09/30/2028
91282CCY5 1,050,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/15/2022 991,183.59 2.17 35.86 991,601.77 974,367.24 30 ATTACHMENT A
248
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
U.S. Treasury
US TREASURY NOTESDTD 02/15/2019 2.625% 02/15/2029
9128286B1 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/21/2022 3/22/2022 1,018,867.19 2.33 3,263.12 1,018,792.38 1,011,875.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/15/2019 1.625% 08/15/2029
912828YB0 1,040,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/21/2022 3/22/2022 993,037.50 2.29 2,100.83 993,211.24 986,212.45 Security Type Sub-Total 251,264,000.00 250,198,272.93 1.15 600,062.58 249,893,842.12 239,503,465.35 Supranational
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTESDTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023 459058JM6 3,740,000.00 AAA Aaa 11/17/2020 11/24/2020 3,731,959.00 0.32 3,298.47 3,735,579.29 3,617,814.20 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTESDTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024 4581X0DZ8 8,380,000.00 AAA Aaa 9/15/2021 9/23/2021 8,373,798.80 0.52 931.11 8,374,873.83 7,978,983.48 Security Type Sub-Total 12,120,000.00 12,105,757.80 0.46 4,229.58 12,110,453.12 11,596,797.68 Negotiable CD
SUMITOMO MITSUI BANK NY CERTDEPOSDTD 07/14/2020 0.700% 07/08/2022 86565CKU2 3,840,000.00 A-1 P-1 7/10/2020 7/14/2020 3,840,000.00 0.70 6,047.99 3,840,000.00 3,837,507.84 NORDEA BANK ABP NEW YORK CERTDEPOSDTD 08/29/2019 1.850% 08/26/2022 65558TLL7 6,060,000.00 A-1+ P-1 8/27/2019 8/29/2019 6,060,000.00 1.84 9,965.33 6,060,000.00 6,076,816.50 SKANDINAV ENSKILDA BANK LT CDDTD 09/03/2019 1.860% 08/26/2022 83050PDR7 7,365,000.00 A-1 P-1 8/29/2019 9/3/2019 7,365,000.00 1.85 12,937.85 7,365,000.00 7,385,732.48 DNB BANK ASA/NY LT CDDTD 12/06/2019 2.040% 12/02/2022
23341VZT1 3,620,000.00 A-1+ P-1 12/5/2019 12/6/2019 3,620,000.00 2.03 24,616.00 3,620,000.00 3,629,940.52 BARCLAYS BANK PLC NY CERTDEPOSDTD 02/03/2022 1.050% 02/01/2023 06742TG34 5,885,000.00 A-1 P-1 2/2/2022 2/3/2022 5,885,000.00 1.05 9,783.81 5,885,000.00 5,827,683.33 CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK CERTDEPOSDTD 03/23/2021 0.590% 03/17/2023 22552G3C2 4,065,000.00 A-1 P-1 3/19/2021 3/23/2021 4,065,000.00 0.59 999.31 4,065,000.00 4,005,740.43 Security Type Sub-Total 30,835,000.00 30,835,000.00 1.41 64,350.29 30,835,000.00 30,763,421.10 31 ATTACHMENT A
249
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Municipal
CA ST TXBL GO BONDSDTD 10/24/2019 2.400% 10/01/2023
13063DRJ9 4,385,000.00 AA- Aa2 10/16/201 10/24/201 4,472,743.85 1.87 52,620.00 4,418,437.85 4,383,640.65 SAN DIEGO CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDSDTD 10/16/2019 2.046% 08/01/2024 797272QP9 1,450,000.00 AAA Aaa 9/18/2019 10/16/201 1,450,000.00 2.05 4,944.50 1,450,000.00 1,429,221.50 MD ST TXBL GO BONDSDTD 08/05/2020 0.510% 08/01/2024
574193TQ1 1,295,000.00 AAA Aaa 7/23/2020 8/5/2020 1,294,637.40 0.52 1,100.75 1,294,787.72 1,238,809.95 CA ST UNIV TXBL REV BONDSDTD 09/17/2020 0.685% 11/01/2024 13077DNC2 1,250,000.00 AA- Aa2 8/27/2020 9/17/2020 1,250,000.00 0.69 3,567.71 1,250,000.00 1,183,112.50 CA ST DEPT WTR RES WTR SYS TXBLREV BNDSDTD 08/06/2020 0.560% 12/01/2024 13067WRB0 155,000.00 AAA Aa1 7/30/2020 8/6/2020 155,000.00 0.56 289.33 155,000.00 146,220.80 UNIV OF CAL TXBL REV BONDSDTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025 91412HGE7 1,060,000.00 AA Aa2 7/10/2020 7/16/2020 1,060,000.00 0.88 3,535.92 1,060,000.00 998,922.80 UNIV OF CAL TXBL REV BONDSDTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025 91412HGE7 460,000.00 AA Aa2 7/14/2020 7/16/2020 461,665.20 0.81 1,534.46 461,065.96 433,494.80 FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REVBONDSDTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025 341271AD6 1,050,000.00 AA Aa3 9/3/2020 9/16/2020 1,057,423.50 1.11 3,302.25 1,055,038.13 996,912.00 FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REVBONDSDTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025 341271AD6 2,700,000.00 AA Aa3 9/3/2020 9/16/2020 2,700,000.00 1.26 8,491.50 2,700,000.00 2,563,488.00 LOS ANGELES CCD, CA TXBL GOBONDSDTD 11/10/2020 0.773% 08/01/2025 54438CYK2 1,930,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/202 11/10/2020 1,930,000.00 0.77 2,486.48 1,930,000.00 1,786,929.10 NJ TURNPIKE AUTHORITY TXBL REVBONDSDTD 02/04/2021 1.047% 01/01/2026 646140DP5 1,115,000.00 AA- A1 1/22/2021 2/4/2021 1,115,000.00 1.05 2,918.51 1,115,000.00 1,039,626.00 Security Type Sub-Total 16,850,000.00 16,946,469.95 1.28 84,791.41 16,889,329.66 16,200,378.10 Federal Agency
FREDDIE MAC NOTESDTD 05/07/2020 0.375% 05/05/2023
3137EAER6 6,430,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/3/2020 8/4/2020 6,461,507.00 0.20 9,778.96 6,442,521.21 6,333,093.47 32 ATTACHMENT A
250
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Federal Agency
FREDDIE MAC NOTESDTD 05/07/2020 0.375% 05/05/2023
3137EAER6 1,880,000.00 AA+ Aaa 6/15/2020 6/16/2020 1,883,158.40 0.32 2,859.17 1,881,196.77 1,851,666.52 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 05/22/2020 0.250% 05/22/2023
3135G04Q3 7,600,000.00 AA+ Aaa 5/20/2020 5/22/2020 7,577,124.00 0.35 6,808.33 7,591,309.21 7,462,280.40 FREDDIE MAC NOTESDTD 06/26/2020 0.250% 06/26/2023
3137EAES4 6,905,000.00 AA+ Aaa 6/24/2020 6/26/2020 6,884,837.40 0.35 4,555.38 6,896,695.59 6,760,540.50 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023
3135G05G4 8,570,000.00 AA+ Aaa 7/8/2020 7/10/2020 8,551,574.50 0.32 4,820.63 8,562,175.47 8,377,629.21 FREDDIE MAC NOTESDTD 08/21/2020 0.250% 08/24/2023
3137EAEV7 4,585,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/19/2020 8/21/2020 4,580,323.30 0.28 1,178.09 4,582,827.76 4,468,032.07 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 09/14/2018 2.875% 09/12/2023
3135G0U43 12,325,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/29/2018 11/30/2018 12,272,249.00 2.97 18,701.48 12,309,026.74 12,452,896.53 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
3135G06H1 3,915,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/25/2021 1/26/2021 3,920,950.80 0.20 3,371.25 3,918,478.49 3,788,913.51 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
3135G06H1 2,180,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/25/2020 11/27/2020 2,179,498.60 0.26 1,877.22 2,179,722.97 2,109,790.92 FREDDIE MAC NOTESDTD 12/04/2020 0.250% 12/04/2023
3137EAFA2 4,445,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/2/2020 12/4/2020 4,440,599.45 0.28 3,611.56 4,442,540.51 4,299,484.04 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS NOTESDTD 12/09/2013 3.375% 12/08/2023 3130A0F70 3,425,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1/30/2019 1/31/2019 3,527,407.50 2.71 36,283.59 3,460,599.90 3,488,187.83 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTESDTD 04/08/2020 0.875% 04/08/2024 3133ELVX9 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 4/7/2020 4/8/2020 1,500,000.00 0.88 6,307.29 1,500,000.00 1,455,898.50 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025
3135G0X24 8,760,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/4/2020 3/5/2020 9,085,346.40 0.84 33,215.00 8,946,122.42 8,556,075.96 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTESDTD 04/16/2020 0.500% 04/14/2025 3130AJHU6 4,920,000.00 AA+ Aaa 4/15/2020 4/16/2020 4,895,596.80 0.60 11,411.67 4,905,162.75 4,628,411.28 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 525,000.00 AA+ Aaa 5/21/2020 5/26/2020 526,727.25 0.56 1,449.22 526,076.64 495,584.77 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 11,600,000.00 AA+ Aaa 6/2/2020 6/3/2020 11,673,892.00 0.49 32,020.84 11,646,265.34 10,950,063.60 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 3,035,000.00 AA+ Aaa 4/29/2020 4/30/2020 3,041,343.15 0.58 8,377.87 3,038,897.30 2,864,951.99 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 6,600,000.00 AA+ Aaa 4/22/2020 4/24/2020 6,586,404.00 0.67 18,218.75 6,591,673.94 6,230,208.60 33 ATTACHMENT A
251
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Federal Agency
FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 7,645,000.00 AA+ Aaa 6/17/2020 6/19/2020 7,629,174.85 0.54 11,042.78 7,634,822.97 7,162,302.35 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 1,490,000.00 AA+ Aaa 9/17/2020 9/18/2020 1,495,304.40 0.42 2,152.22 1,493,590.34 1,395,922.89 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 4,150,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/2/2020 10/5/2020 4,167,720.50 0.41 5,994.44 4,162,113.14 3,887,973.15 FREDDIE MAC NOTESDTD 07/23/2020 0.375% 07/21/2025
3137EAEU9 4,620,000.00 AA+ Aaa 7/21/2020 7/23/2020 4,596,992.40 0.48 3,368.75 4,604,775.12 4,304,320.02 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 3,075,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/22/202 10/23/202 3,057,780.00 0.49 1,153.12 3,062,896.30 2,859,144.22 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 4,915,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/25/2020 8/27/2020 4,891,997.80 0.47 1,843.13 4,899,337.32 4,569,981.75 FREDDIE MAC NOTESDTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
3137EAEX3 7,090,000.00 AA+ Aaa 9/23/2020 9/25/2020 7,068,659.10 0.44 590.83 7,075,129.23 6,581,420.12 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK(CALLABLE)DTD 09/29/2020 0.530% 09/29/2025 3133EMBH4 4,530,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/7/2020 10/9/2020 4,522,072.50 0.57 133.38 4,524,425.43 4,222,725.57 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
3135G06G3 6,190,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/3/2020 12/4/2020 6,188,885.80 0.50 12,380.00 6,189,184.94 5,761,577.72 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
3135G06G3 4,625,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/9/2020 11/12/2020 4,608,442.50 0.57 9,250.00 4,613,034.23 4,304,894.50 FANNIE MAE NOTESDTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
3135G06G3 5,475,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/19/2020 11/24/2020 5,472,919.50 0.51 10,950.00 5,473,486.49 5,096,064.30 Security Type Sub-Total 153,005,000.00 153,288,488.90 0.73 263,704.95 153,154,088.52 146,720,036.29 Corporate
INTEL CORP NOTES (CALLED, OMD05/11/2022DTD 05/11/2017 2.350% 04/11/2022 458140BB5 4,000,000.00 A+ A1 7/10/2017 7/13/2017 4,002,480.00 2.34 36,555.56 4,000,014.31 4,001,096.00 HOME DEPOT INC CORP NOTES(CALLED, OMD 6DTD 06/02/2015 2.625% 05/01/2022 437076BG6 2,000,000.00 A A2 7/10/2017 7/13/2017 2,029,380.00 2.30 17,500.00 2,000,502.80 2,002,942.00 34 ATTACHMENT A
252
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

APPLE INC CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE
DTD 05/11/2017 2.300% 05/11/2022
037833CQ1 165,000.00 AA+ Aaa 7/10/2017 7/13/2017 164,780.55 2.33 1,475.83 164,995.02 165,139.43 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (CALLABLE)NOTESDTD 05/16/2017 2.350% 05/16/2022 911312BC9 4,000,000.00 A- A2 7/10/2017 7/13/2017 4,012,880.00 2.28 35,250.00 4,000,111.16 4,003,660.00

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE
DTD 01/10/2020 1.950% 05/10/2023
02665WDH1 3,550,000.00 A- A3 1/7/2020 1/10/2020 3,548,686.50 1.96 27,113.13 3,549,563.61 3,537,209.35 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORPCORPORATE NOTESDTD 08/11/2020 0.350% 08/11/2023 69371RQ90 485,000.00 A+ A1 8/4/2020 8/11/2020 484,364.65 0.39 235.76 484,711.63 471,942.83 BANK OF NY MELLON CORP CORPNOTESDTD 08/13/2018 3.450% 08/11/2023 06406RAJ6 6,735,000.00 A A1 1/30/2019 1/31/2019 6,814,742.40 3.17 32,271.88 6,758,975.79 6,828,246.08 US BANK NA CINCINNATI CORPNOTES (CALLABDTD 02/04/2019 3.375% 02/05/2024 91159HHV5 2,125,000.00 A+ A2 4/2/2019 4/4/2019 2,171,197.50 2.89 11,156.25 2,142,127.92 2,152,899.13 MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE) CORPNOTESDTD 03/07/2019 2.900% 03/07/2024 58933YAU9 4,625,000.00 A+ A1 11/19/2021 11/23/2021 4,839,183.75 0.85 8,941.67 4,804,903.72 4,666,916.38 PFIZER INC CORP NOTESDTD 03/11/2019 2.950% 03/15/2024
717081ES8 6,400,000.00 A+ A2 6/3/2019 6/5/2019 6,562,752.00 2.38 8,391.11 6,464,968.02 6,454,707.20 MASTERCARD INC CORP NOTESDTD 03/31/2014 3.375% 04/01/2024 57636QAB0 4,250,000.00 A+ A1 4/2/2019 4/4/2019 4,388,762.50 2.67 71,718.75 4,305,611.51 4,320,839.00 MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 04/22/2021 0.731% 04/05/2024 61772BAA1 670,000.00 BBB+ A1 4/19/2021 4/22/2021 670,000.00 0.73 2,394.43 670,000.00 655,925.31 MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 04/22/2021 0.731% 04/05/2024 61772BAA1 1,995,000.00 BBB+ A1 4/20/2021 4/22/2021 1,997,513.70 0.69 7,129.69 1,996,300.92 1,953,091.04 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE
NOTESDTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
023135BW5 3,085,000.00 AA A1 5/10/2021 5/12/2021 3,080,495.90 0.50 5,360.19 3,081,827.40 2,962,648.90 WALMART INC CORPORATE NOTESDTD 04/23/2019 2.850% 07/08/2024 931142EL3 8,200,000.00 AA Aa2 5/12/2020 5/14/2020 8,837,386.00 0.94 53,880.83 8,426,612.85 8,276,784.80 35 ATTACHMENT A
253
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Corporate
US BANCORP NOTES (CALLABLE)DTD 07/29/2019 2.400% 07/30/2024 91159HHX1 3,300,000.00 A+ A2 8/1/2019 8/5/2019 3,302,739.00 2.38 13,420.00 3,301,253.91 3,277,629.30 JPMORGAN CHASE & COCORPORATE NOTES (CALDTD 09/16/2020 0.653% 09/16/2024 46647PBS4 2,935,000.00 A- A2 9/9/2020 9/16/2020 2,935,000.00 0.65 798.56 2,935,000.00 2,849,359.64 BANK OF AMERICA CORP(CALLABLE) CORPORATDTD 10/21/2020 0.810% 10/24/2024 06051GJH3 3,815,000.00 A- A2 10/16/202 10/21/202 3,815,000.00 0.81 13,476.49 3,815,000.00 3,685,843.18 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORPCORPORATE NOTESDTD 01/10/2022 1.250% 01/10/2025 24422EVY2 4,715,000.00 A A2 3/8/2022 3/10/2022 4,596,134.85 2.17 13,260.94 4,598,656.58 4,524,622.45 MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE)NOTESDTD 02/12/2015 2.700% 02/12/2025 594918BB9 5,350,000.00 AAA Aaa 3/4/2021 3/8/2021 5,727,763.50 0.87 19,661.25 5,618,506.99 5,369,907.35 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPNOTESDTD 02/13/2020 1.800% 02/13/2025 89236TGT6 2,180,000.00 A+ A1 5/20/2020 5/26/2020 2,201,298.60 1.58 5,232.00 2,192,959.53 2,114,593.46 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPNOTESDTD 02/13/2020 1.800% 02/13/2025 89236TGT6 1,595,000.00 A+ A1 5/21/2020 5/26/2020 1,616,692.00 1.50 3,828.00 1,608,198.90 1,547,145.22 NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORPDTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
66989HAP3 7,360,000.00 AA- A1 5/8/2020 5/12/2020 7,619,513.60 0.99 16,815.56 7,514,826.91 7,178,870.40 CITIGROUP INC CORPORATE NOTESDTD 05/04/2021 0.981% 05/01/2025 172967MX6 1,310,000.00 BBB+ A3 4/27/2021 5/4/2021 1,310,000.00 0.98 5,354.63 1,310,000.00 1,248,017.35 CITIGROUP INC CORPORATE NOTESDTD 05/04/2021 0.981% 05/01/2025 172967MX6 1,400,000.00 BBB+ A3 4/28/2021 5/4/2021 1,403,710.00 0.91 5,722.50 1,402,865.20 1,333,759.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INCCORPORATE NOTESDTD 05/22/2015 3.750% 05/22/2025 38148LAE6 3,635,000.00 BBB+ A2 2/12/2021 2/17/2021 4,060,949.30 0.94 48,845.31 3,942,404.07 3,691,815.05 HONEYWELL INTL CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 05/18/2020 1.350% 06/01/2025 438516CB0 4,000,000.00 A A2 9/3/2021 9/8/2021 4,078,320.00 0.82 18,000.00 4,066,257.19 3,837,652.00 JPMORGAN CHASE & COCORPORATE NOTESDTD 08/10/2021 0.768% 08/09/2025 46647PCM6 3,360,000.00 A- A2 8/3/2021 8/10/2021 3,360,000.00 0.77 3,727.36 3,360,000.00 3,184,157.76 36 ATTACHMENT A
254
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Corporate
STATE STREET CORP CORPORATENOTESDTD 02/07/2022 1.746% 02/06/2026 857477BR3 875,000.00 A A1 2/2/2022 2/7/2022 875,000.00 1.75 2,291.63 875,000.00 846,902.88 BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 03/22/2022 3.384% 04/02/2026 06051GKM0 3,750,000.00 A- A2 3/17/2022 3/22/2022 3,750,000.00 3.38 3,172.50 3,750,000.00 3,744,296.25 TARGET CORP CORPORATE NOTESDTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027 87612EBM7 780,000.00 A A2 1/19/2022 1/24/2022 778,674.00 1.99 2,830.75 778,722.89 753,602.46 TARGET CORP CORPORATE NOTESDTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027 87612EBM7 3,500,000.00 A A2 1/27/2022 1/31/2022 3,497,865.00 1.96 12,702.08 3,497,935.77 3,381,549.50 Security Type Sub-Total 106,145,000.00 108,533,265.30 1.66 508,514.64 107,418,814.60 105,023,770.70 Agency CMBS
FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED PDTD 11/01/2015 2.716% 06/01/2022 3137BLUR7 734,026.19 AA+ Aaa 4/2/2019 4/5/2019 735,861.26 2.63 1,661.35 734,123.28 734,002.76 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED PDTD 12/01/2012 2.307% 08/01/2022 3137AWQH1 2,240,000.00 AA+ Aaa 9/4/2019 9/9/2019 2,273,075.00 1.78 4,306.40 2,243,817.55 2,241,441.53 FHLMC SERIES K721 A2DTD 12/01/2015 3.090% 08/01/2022
3137BM6P6 1,534,994.72 AA+ Aaa 4/4/2018 4/9/2018 1,548,066.15 2.88 3,952.61 1,536,007.24 1,537,860.91 FANNIEMAE-ACESDTD 04/01/2014 3.346% 03/01/2024
3136AJB54 2,340,048.09 AA+ Aaa 12/13/201 12/18/201 2,453,759.82 2.14 6,524.83 2,391,903.60 2,365,856.13 FHMS KJ27 A1DTD 11/01/2019 2.092% 07/01/2024
3137FQ3V3 328,447.20 AA+ Aaa 11/20/2019 11/26/2019 328,439.31 2.09 572.59 328,443.34 328,377.21 Security Type Sub-Total 7,177,516.20 7,339,201.54 2.23 17,017.78 7,234,295.01 7,207,538.54 ABS
HAROT 2019-1 A3DTD 02/27/2019 2.830% 03/20/2023
43814WAC9 128,060.95 AAA NR 2/19/2019 2/27/2019 128,057.52 2.83 130.87 128,060.13 128,268.51 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUSTDTD 04/10/2019 2.660% 06/15/2023 44932NAD2 168,392.71 AAA NR 4/3/2019 4/10/2019 168,370.55 2.66 199.08 168,386.32 168,505.99 HAROT 2019-2 A3DTD 05/29/2019 2.520% 06/21/2023
43815MAC0 505,298.51 NR Aaa 5/21/2019 5/29/2019 505,279.67 2.52 353.71 505,292.85 506,519.61 37 ATTACHMENT A
255
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
ABS
NAROT 2019-A A3DTD 02/13/2019 2.900% 10/15/2023
65479KAD2 475,387.60 NR Aaa 2/5/2019 2/13/2019 475,315.58 2.90 612.72 475,363.86 476,296.16 NAROT 2019-B A3DTD 05/28/2019 2.500% 11/15/2023
65479HAC1 660,815.93 NR Aaa 5/21/2019 5/28/2019 660,666.51 2.51 734.24 660,761.64 662,897.70 COPAR 2019-1 A3DTD 05/30/2019 2.510% 11/15/2023
14042WAC4 246,769.58 AAA Aaa 5/21/2019 5/30/2019 246,719.59 2.51 275.29 246,751.39 247,355.46 CARMX 2019-2 A3DTD 04/17/2019 2.680% 03/15/2024
14316LAC7 474,906.07 AAA NR 4/9/2019 4/17/2019 474,857.53 2.68 565.67 474,886.75 476,570.71 TAOT 2020-A A3DTD 02/12/2020 1.660% 05/15/2024
89232HAC9 2,346,174.90 AAA Aaa 2/4/2020 2/12/2020 2,346,005.50 1.66 1,730.96 2,346,090.42 2,344,462.66 NAROT 2020-B A3DTD 06/30/2020 0.550% 07/15/2024
65479CAD0 681,845.47 AAA Aaa 6/23/2020 6/30/2020 681,826.79 0.55 166.67 681,834.89 677,485.89 CARMX 2020-1 A3DTD 01/22/2020 1.890% 12/16/2024
14315XAC2 1,260,020.97 AAA NR 1/14/2020 1/22/2020 1,259,773.75 1.89 1,058.42 1,259,884.24 1,258,743.43 HAROT 2021-1 A3DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
43813GAC5 1,445,000.00 NR Aaa 2/17/2021 2/24/2021 1,444,973.56 0.27 108.38 1,444,980.55 1,413,305.95 HART 2021-A A3DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
44933LAC7 1,145,000.00 AAA NR 4/20/2021 4/28/2021 1,144,879.55 0.38 193.38 1,144,904.98 1,115,576.36 CARMX 2021-1 A3DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
14316NAC3 860,000.00 AAA NR 1/20/2021 1/27/2021 859,830.06 0.34 129.96 859,870.95 838,924.84 TAOT 2021-C A3DTD 09/27/2021 0.430% 01/15/2026
89239BAC5 2,000,000.00 AAA Aaa 9/21/2021 9/27/2021 1,999,840.60 0.43 382.22 1,999,859.47 1,934,852.40 CARMX 2021-2 A3DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
14314QAC8 1,725,000.00 AAA NR 4/13/2021 4/21/2021 1,724,628.26 0.52 398.67 1,724,701.01 1,685,118.69 HART 2021-C A3DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026
44935FAD6 990,000.00 AAA NR 11/9/2021 11/17/2021 989,779.03 0.75 325.60 989,797.22 950,738.98 DCENT 2021-A1 A1DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026
254683CP8 1,595,000.00 AAA Aaa 9/20/2021 9/27/2021 1,594,658.51 0.58 411.16 1,594,693.52 1,512,527.81 Security Type Sub-Total 16,707,672.69 16,705,462.56 1.10 7,777.00 16,706,120.19 16,398,151.15 Managed Account Sub Total 594,104,188.89 595,951,918.98 1,550,448.23 573,413,558.91Securities Sub TotalAccrued Interest $594,104,188.89 $595,951,918.98 $1,550,448.23 $573,413,558.91 $1,550,448.23
594,241,943.22
$594,241,943.22

1.15 1.15%
38 ATTACHMENT A
256
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Holdings
|
Total Investments $574,964,007.14
39 ATTACHMENT A
257
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
BUY1/4/2022 1/6/2022 8,475,000.00 91282CBH3 US TREASURY NOTES 0.37% 1/31/2026 8,188,133.91 1.27%1/5/2022 1/6/2022 5,930,000.00 912828W71 US TREASURY NOTES 2.12% 3/31/2024 6,127,001.44 0.88%1/19/2022 1/24/2022 780,000.00 87612EBM7 TARGET CORP CORPORATE NOTES 1.95% 1/15/2027 778,674.00 1.99%1/27/2022 1/31/2022 3,500,000.00 87612EBM7 TARGET CORP CORPORATE NOTES 1.95% 1/15/2027 3,499,192.08 1.96%2/2/2022 2/3/2022 5,885,000.00 06742TG34 BARCLAYS BANK PLC NY CERT DEPOS 1.05% 2/1/2023 5,885,000.00 1.05%2/2/2022 2/3/2022 10,690,000.00 91282CBQ3 US TREASURY NOTES 0.50% 2/28/2026 10,272,906.36 1.55%2/2/2022 2/7/2022 875,000.00 857477BR3 STATE STREET CORP CORPORATE NOTES 1.74% 2/6/2026 875,000.00 1.75%2/18/2022 2/22/2022 7,635,000.00 91282CBH3 US TREASURY NOTES 0.37% 1/31/2026 7,217,709.75 1.83%3/8/2022 3/10/2022 4,715,000.00 24422EVY2 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP CORPORATE NOTES 1.25% 1/10/2025 4,605,957.77 2.17%3/14/2022 3/15/2022 1,080,000.00 91282CBJ9 US TREASURY NOTES 0.75% 1/31/2028 997,726.21 2.15%3/14/2022 3/15/2022 1,050,000.00 91282CCY5 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 1.25% 9/30/2028 997,169.17 2.17%3/17/2022 3/22/2022 3,750,000.00 06051GKM0 BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 3.38% 4/2/2026 3,750,000.00 3.38%3/21/2022 3/22/2022 1,000,000.00 9128286B1 US TREASURY NOTES 2.62% 2/15/2029 1,021,405.17 2.33%3/21/2022 3/22/2022 1,040,000.00 912828YB0 US TREASURY NOTES 1.62% 8/15/2029 994,671.48 2.29% Total BUY 56,405,000.00 55,210,547.34 0.00
INTEREST1/1/2022 1/1/2022 1,115,000.00 646140DP5 NJ TURNPIKE AUTHORITY TXBL REV BONDS 1.04% 1/1/2026 5,837.03 40 ATTACHMENT A
258
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST1/1/2022 1/1/2022 3,750,000.00 341271AD6 FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS 1.25% 7/1/2025 23,587.501/1/2022 1/25/2022 2,370,054.51 3136AJB54 FANNIEMAE-ACES 3.34% 3/1/2024 6,608.501/1/2022 1/25/2022 2,240,000.00 3137AWQH1 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.30% 8/1/2022 4,306.401/1/2022 1/25/2022 1,795,724.05 3137BM6P6 FHLMC SERIES K721 A2 3.09% 8/1/2022 4,623.991/1/2022 1/25/2022 440,838.84 3137FQ3V3 FHMS KJ27 A1 2.09% 7/1/2024 1,862.121/1/2022 1/25/2022 1,340,369.71 3137BLUR7 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.71% 6/1/2022 3,033.701/3/2022 1/3/2022 MONEY0002 MONEY MARKET FUND 30.301/7/2022 1/7/2022 8,760,000.00 3135G0X24 FANNIE MAE NOTES 1.62% 1/7/2025 71,175.001/8/2022 1/8/2022 8,200,000.00 931142EL3 WALMART INC CORPORATE NOTES 2.85% 7/8/2024 116,850.001/10/2022 1/10/2022 3,840,000.00 86565CKU2 SUMITOMO MITSUI BANK NY CERT DEPOS 0.70% 7/8/2022 13,887.971/10/2022 1/10/2022 8,570,000.00 3135G05G4 FANNIE MAE NOTES 0.25% 7/10/2023 10,712.501/15/2022 1/15/2022 877,821.35 65479CAD0 NAROT 2020-B A3 0.55% 7/15/2024 402.331/15/2022 1/15/2022 411,528.29 44932NAD2 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2.66% 6/15/2023 912.221/15/2022 1/15/2022 680,307.08 14316LAC7 CARMX 2019-2 A3 2.68% 3/15/2024 1,519.351/15/2022 1/15/2022 1,725,000.00 14314QAC8 CARMX 2021-2 A3 0.52% 2/17/2026 747.501/15/2022 1/15/2022 405,660.11 14042WAC4 COPAR 2019-1 A3 2.51% 11/15/2023 848.511/15/2022 1/15/2022 1,550,405.77 14315XAC2 CARMX 2020-1 A3 1.89% 12/16/2024 2,441.89 41 ATTACHMENT A
259
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST1/15/2022 1/15/2022 2,000,000.00 89239BAC5 TAOT 2021-C A3 0.43% 1/15/2026 716.671/15/2022 1/15/2022 792,742.42 65479KAD2 NAROT 2019-A A3 2.90% 10/15/2023 1,915.791/15/2022 1/15/2022 860,000.00 14316NAC3 CARMX 2021-1 A3 0.34% 12/15/2025 243.671/15/2022 1/15/2022 3,028,827.38 89232HAC9 TAOT 2020-A A3 1.66% 5/15/2024 4,189.881/15/2022 1/15/2022 1,595,000.00 254683CP8 DCENT 2021-A1 A1 0.58% 9/15/2026 770.921/15/2022 1/15/2022 985,204.84 65479HAC1 NAROT 2019-B A3 2.50% 11/15/2023 2,052.511/15/2022 1/15/2022 1,145,000.00 44933LAC7 HART 2021-A A3 0.38% 9/15/2025 362.581/15/2022 1/15/2022 205,233.98 65479GAD1 NAROT 2018-B A3 3.06% 3/15/2023 523.351/15/2022 1/15/2022 990,000.00 44935FAD6 HART 2021-C A3 0.74% 5/15/2026 610.501/18/2022 1/18/2022 272,808.46 43814WAC9 HAROT 2019-1 A3 2.83% 3/20/2023 643.371/21/2022 1/21/2022 1,445,000.00 43813GAC5 HAROT 2021-1 A3 0.27% 4/21/2025 325.131/21/2022 1/21/2022 822,551.44 43815MAC0 HAROT 2019-2 A3 2.52% 6/21/2023 1,727.361/21/2022 1/21/2022 4,620,000.00 3137EAEU9 FREDDIE MAC NOTES 0.37% 7/21/2025 8,662.501/30/2022 1/30/2022 3,300,000.00 91159HHX1 US BANCORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 2.40% 7/30/2024 39,600.001/31/2022 1/31/2022 26,975,000.00 91282CBH3 US TREASURY NOTES 0.37% 1/31/2026 50,578.131/31/2022 1/31/2022 2,500,000.00 9128282N9 US TREASURY NOTES 2.12% 7/31/2024 26,562.501/31/2022 1/31/2022 5,465,000.00 912828S92 US TREASURY NOTES 1.25% 7/31/2023 34,156.25 42 ATTACHMENT A
260
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST1/31/2022 1/31/2022 3,415,000.00 9128286A3 US TREASURY NOTES 2.62% 1/31/2026 44,821.882/1/2022 2/1/2022 1,930,000.00 54438CYK2 LOS ANGELES CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDS 0.77% 8/1/2025 7,459.452/1/2022 2/1/2022 MONEY0002 MONEY MARKET FUND 20.532/1/2022 2/1/2022 1,295,000.00 574193TQ1 MD ST TXBL GO BONDS 0.51% 8/1/2024 3,302.252/1/2022 2/1/2022 1,450,000.00 797272QP9 SAN DIEGO CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDS 2.04% 8/1/2024 14,833.502/1/2022 2/25/2022 2,365,393.16 3136AJB54 FANNIEMAE-ACES 3.34% 3/1/2024 6,722.852/1/2022 2/25/2022 2,240,000.00 3137AWQH1 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.30% 8/1/2022 4,306.402/1/2022 2/25/2022 404,388.15 3137FQ3V3 FHMS KJ27 A1 2.09% 7/1/2024 704.982/1/2022 2/25/2022 1,691,041.17 3137BM6P6 FHLMC SERIES K721 A2 3.09% 8/1/2022 4,354.432/1/2022 2/25/2022 1,260,609.32 3137BLUR7 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.71% 6/1/2022 2,853.182/5/2022 2/5/2022 2,125,000.00 91159HHV5 US BANK NA CINCINNATI CORP NOTES (CALLAB 3.37% 2/5/2024 35,859.382/9/2022 2/9/2022 3,360,000.00 46647PCM6 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORPORATE NOTES 0.76% 8/9/2025 12,830.722/11/2022 2/11/2022 485,000.00 69371RQ90 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP CORPORATE NOTES 0.35% 8/11/2023 848.752/11/2022 2/11/2022 6,735,000.00 06406RAJ6 BANK OF NY MELLON CORP CORP NOTES 3.45% 8/11/2023 116,178.752/12/2022 2/12/2022 5,350,000.00 594918BB9 MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES 2.70% 2/12/2025 72,225.002/13/2022 2/13/2022 3,775,000.00 89236TGT6 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP NOTES 1.80% 2/13/2025 33,975.002/14/2022 2/14/2022 7,360,000.00 66989HAP3 NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP 1.75% 2/14/2025 64,400.00 43 ATTACHMENT A
261
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST2/15/2022 2/15/2022 867,629.48 65479HAC1 NAROT 2019-B A3 2.50% 11/15/2023 1,807.562/15/2022 2/15/2022 607,826.94 14316LAC7 CARMX 2019-2 A3 2.68% 3/15/2024 1,357.482/15/2022 2/15/2022 1,725,000.00 14314QAC8 CARMX 2021-2 A3 0.52% 2/17/2026 747.502/15/2022 2/15/2022 1,595,000.00 254683CP8 DCENT 2021-A1 A1 0.58% 9/15/2026 770.922/15/2022 2/15/2022 116,416.58 65479GAD1 NAROT 2018-B A3 3.06% 3/15/2023 296.862/15/2022 2/15/2022 990,000.00 44935FAD6 HART 2021-C A3 0.74% 5/15/2026 610.502/15/2022 2/15/2022 678,890.99 65479KAD2 NAROT 2019-A A3 2.90% 10/15/2023 1,640.652/15/2022 2/15/2022 860,000.00 14316NAC3 CARMX 2021-1 A3 0.34% 12/15/2025 243.672/15/2022 2/15/2022 349,751.72 14042WAC4 COPAR 2019-1 A3 2.51% 11/15/2023 731.562/15/2022 2/15/2022 2,783,604.05 89232HAC9 TAOT 2020-A A3 1.66% 5/15/2024 3,850.652/15/2022 2/15/2022 2,000,000.00 89239BAC5 TAOT 2021-C A3 0.43% 1/15/2026 716.672/15/2022 2/15/2022 809,297.03 65479CAD0 NAROT 2020-B A3 0.55% 7/15/2024 370.932/15/2022 2/15/2022 1,445,569.46 14315XAC2 CARMX 2020-1 A3 1.89% 12/16/2024 2,276.772/15/2022 2/15/2022 6,020,000.00 91282CCT6 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.37% 8/15/2024 11,287.502/15/2022 2/15/2022 1,145,000.00 44933LAC7 HART 2021-A A3 0.38% 9/15/2025 362.582/15/2022 2/15/2022 324,329.29 44932NAD2 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2.66% 6/15/2023 718.932/18/2022 2/18/2022 222,080.89 43814WAC9 HAROT 2019-1 A3 2.83% 3/20/2023 523.74 44 ATTACHMENT A
262
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST2/21/2022 2/21/2022 710,776.63 43815MAC0 HAROT 2019-2 A3 2.52% 6/21/2023 1,492.632/21/2022 2/21/2022 1,445,000.00 43813GAC5 HAROT 2021-1 A3 0.27% 4/21/2025 325.132/24/2022 2/24/2022 4,585,000.00 3137EAEV7 FREDDIE MAC NOTES 0.25% 8/24/2023 5,731.252/25/2022 2/25/2022 7,990,000.00 3135G05X7 FANNIE MAE NOTES 0.37% 8/25/2025 14,981.252/26/2022 2/26/2022 7,365,000.00 83050PDR7 SKANDINAV ENSKILDA BANK LT CD 1.86% 8/26/2022 70,016.602/28/2022 2/28/2022 14,275,000.00 9128282U3 US TREASURY NOTES 1.87% 8/31/2024 133,828.132/28/2022 2/28/2022 17,640,000.00 91282CAJ0 US TREASURY NOTES 0.25% 8/31/2025 22,050.002/28/2022 2/28/2022 25,340,000.00 91282CBQ3 US TREASURY NOTES 0.50% 2/28/2026 63,350.002/28/2022 2/28/2022 6,060,000.00 65558TLL7 NORDEA BANK ABP NEW YORK CERT DEPOS 1.85% 8/26/2022 57,923.502/28/2022 2/28/2022 8,945,000.00 912828ZC7 US TREASURY NOTES 1.12% 2/28/2025 50,315.632/28/2022 2/28/2022 3,419,000.00 9128286G0 US TREASURY NOTES 2.37% 2/29/2024 40,600.633/1/2022 3/1/2022 MONEY0002 MONEY MARKET FUND 90.953/1/2022 3/25/2022 403,014.17 3137FQ3V3 FHMS KJ27 A1 2.09% 7/1/2024 1,030.313/1/2022 3/25/2022 1,581,517.32 3137BM6P6 FHLMC SERIES K721 A2 3.09% 8/1/2022 4,072.413/1/2022 3/25/2022 2,352,048.04 3136AJB54 FANNIEMAE-ACES 3.34% 3/1/2024 6,683.883/1/2022 3/25/2022 2,240,000.00 3137AWQH1 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.30% 8/1/2022 4,306.403/1/2022 3/25/2022 981,039.43 3137BLUR7 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.71% 6/1/2022 2,220.42 45 ATTACHMENT A
263
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST3/7/2022 3/7/2022 4,625,000.00 58933YAU9 MERCK & CO INC (CALLABLE) CORP NOTES 2.90% 3/7/2024 67,062.503/12/2022 3/12/2022 12,325,000.00 3135G0U43 FANNIE MAE NOTES 2.87% 9/12/2023 177,171.883/15/2022 3/15/2022 1,352,186.36 14315XAC2 CARMX 2020-1 A3 1.89% 12/16/2024 2,129.693/15/2022 3/15/2022 3,155,000.00 91282CCX7 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.37% 9/15/2024 5,915.633/15/2022 3/15/2022 1,725,000.00 14314QAC8 CARMX 2021-2 A3 0.52% 2/17/2026 747.503/15/2022 3/15/2022 2,000,000.00 89239BAC5 TAOT 2021-C A3 0.43% 1/15/2026 716.673/15/2022 3/15/2022 541,264.49 14316LAC7 CARMX 2019-2 A3 2.68% 3/15/2024 1,208.823/15/2022 3/15/2022 243,027.68 44932NAD2 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2.66% 6/15/2023 538.713/15/2022 3/15/2022 1,145,000.00 44933LAC7 HART 2021-A A3 0.38% 9/15/2025 362.583/15/2022 3/15/2022 1,595,000.00 254683CP8 DCENT 2021-A1 A1 0.58% 9/15/2026 770.923/15/2022 3/15/2022 36,320.66 65479GAD1 NAROT 2018-B A3 3.06% 3/15/2023 92.623/15/2022 3/15/2022 743,344.89 65479CAD0 NAROT 2020-B A3 0.55% 7/15/2024 340.703/15/2022 3/15/2022 860,000.00 14316NAC3 CARMX 2021-1 A3 0.34% 12/15/2025 243.673/15/2022 3/15/2022 990,000.00 44935FAD6 HART 2021-C A3 0.74% 5/15/2026 610.503/15/2022 3/15/2022 759,879.21 65479HAC1 NAROT 2019-B A3 2.50% 11/15/2023 1,583.083/15/2022 3/15/2022 575,247.62 65479KAD2 NAROT 2019-A A3 2.90% 10/15/2023 1,390.183/15/2022 3/15/2022 2,554,326.96 89232HAC9 TAOT 2020-A A3 1.66% 5/15/2024 3,533.49 46 ATTACHMENT A
264
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST3/15/2022 3/15/2022 297,063.48 14042WAC4 COPAR 2019-1 A3 2.51% 11/15/2023 621.363/15/2022 3/15/2022 6,400,000.00 717081ES8 PFIZER INC CORP NOTES 2.95% 3/15/2024 94,400.003/16/2022 3/16/2022 2,935,000.00 46647PBS4 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORPORATE NOTES (CAL 0.65% 9/16/2024 9,582.783/17/2022 3/17/2022 4,065,000.00 22552G3C2 CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK CERT DEPOS 0.59% 3/17/2023 23,916.883/18/2022 3/18/2022 174,142.88 43814WAC9 HAROT 2019-1 A3 2.83% 3/20/2023 410.693/21/2022 3/21/2022 1,445,000.00 43813GAC5 HAROT 2021-1 A3 0.27% 4/21/2025 325.133/21/2022 3/21/2022 605,258.01 43815MAC0 HAROT 2019-2 A3 2.52% 6/21/2023 1,271.043/23/2022 3/23/2022 8,380,000.00 4581X0DZ8 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES 0.50% 9/23/2024 20,950.003/23/2022 3/23/2022 7,090,000.00 3137EAEX3 FREDDIE MAC NOTES 0.37% 9/23/2025 13,293.753/29/2022 3/29/2022 4,530,000.00 3133EMBH4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK (CALLABLE) 0.53% 9/29/2025 12,004.503/31/2022 3/31/2022 1,050,000.00 91282CCY5 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 1.25% 9/30/2028 6,562.503/31/2022 3/31/2022 5,930,000.00 912828W71 US TREASURY NOTES 2.12% 3/31/2024 63,006.253/31/2022 3/31/2022 5,000,000.00 912828T26 US TREASURY NOTES 1.37% 9/30/2023 34,375.00 Total INTEREST 361,316,364.29 1,921,197.58 0.00
MATURITY1/1/2022 1/1/2022 85,667.38 3137BHXY8 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.79% 1/1/2022 85,866.63 Total MATURITY 85,667.38 85,866.63 0.00
47 ATTACHMENT A
265
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
PAYDOWNS1/1/2022 1/25/2022 4,661.35 3136AJB54 FANNIEMAE-ACES 3.34% 3/1/2024 4,661.351/1/2022 1/25/2022 36,450.69 3137FQ3V3 FHMS KJ27 A1 2.09% 7/1/2024 36,450.691/1/2022 1/25/2022 104,682.88 3137BM6P6 FHLMC SERIES K721 A2 3.09% 8/1/2022 104,682.881/1/2022 1/25/2022 79,760.39 3137BLUR7 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.71% 6/1/2022 79,760.391/15/2022 1/15/2022 68,524.32 65479CAD0 NAROT 2020-B A3 0.55% 7/15/2024 68,524.321/15/2022 1/15/2022 117,575.36 65479HAC1 NAROT 2019-B A3 2.50% 11/15/2023 117,575.361/15/2022 1/15/2022 87,199.00 44932NAD2 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2.66% 6/15/2023 87,199.001/15/2022 1/15/2022 88,817.40 65479GAD1 NAROT 2018-B A3 3.06% 3/15/2023 88,817.401/15/2022 1/15/2022 245,223.33 89232HAC9 TAOT 2020-A A3 1.66% 5/15/2024 245,223.331/15/2022 1/15/2022 72,480.14 14316LAC7 CARMX 2019-2 A3 2.68% 3/15/2024 72,480.141/15/2022 1/15/2022 55,908.39 14042WAC4 COPAR 2019-1 A3 2.51% 11/15/2023 55,908.391/15/2022 1/15/2022 113,851.43 65479KAD2 NAROT 2019-A A3 2.90% 10/15/2023 113,851.431/15/2022 1/15/2022 104,836.31 14315XAC2 CARMX 2020-1 A3 1.89% 12/16/2024 104,836.311/18/2022 1/18/2022 50,727.57 43814WAC9 HAROT 2019-1 A3 2.83% 3/20/2023 50,727.571/21/2022 1/21/2022 111,774.81 43815MAC0 HAROT 2019-2 A3 2.52% 6/21/2023 111,774.812/1/2022 2/25/2022 109,523.85 3137BM6P6 FHLMC SERIES K721 A2 3.09% 8/1/2022 109,523.852/1/2022 2/25/2022 1,373.98 3137FQ3V3 FHMS KJ27 A1 2.09% 7/1/2024 1,373.98 48 ATTACHMENT A
266
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
PAYDOWNS2/1/2022 2/25/2022 279,569.89 3137BLUR7 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.71% 6/1/2022 279,569.892/1/2022 2/25/2022 13,345.12 3136AJB54 FANNIEMAE-ACES 3.34% 3/1/2024 13,345.122/15/2022 2/15/2022 80,095.92 65479GAD1 NAROT 2018-B A3 3.06% 3/15/2023 80,095.922/15/2022 2/15/2022 103,643.37 65479KAD2 NAROT 2019-A A3 2.90% 10/15/2023 103,643.372/15/2022 2/15/2022 107,750.27 65479HAC1 NAROT 2019-B A3 2.50% 11/15/2023 107,750.272/15/2022 2/15/2022 93,383.10 14315XAC2 CARMX 2020-1 A3 1.89% 12/16/2024 93,383.102/15/2022 2/15/2022 81,301.61 44932NAD2 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2.66% 6/15/2023 81,301.612/15/2022 2/15/2022 229,277.09 89232HAC9 TAOT 2020-A A3 1.66% 5/15/2024 229,277.092/15/2022 2/15/2022 52,688.24 14042WAC4 COPAR 2019-1 A3 2.51% 11/15/2023 52,688.242/15/2022 2/15/2022 65,952.14 65479CAD0 NAROT 2020-B A3 0.55% 7/15/2024 65,952.142/15/2022 2/15/2022 66,562.45 14316LAC7 CARMX 2019-2 A3 2.68% 3/15/2024 66,562.452/18/2022 2/18/2022 47,938.01 43814WAC9 HAROT 2019-1 A3 2.83% 3/20/2023 47,938.012/21/2022 2/21/2022 105,518.62 43815MAC0 HAROT 2019-2 A3 2.52% 6/21/2023 105,518.623/1/2022 3/25/2022 11,999.95 3136AJB54 FANNIEMAE-ACES 3.34% 3/1/2024 11,999.953/1/2022 3/25/2022 46,522.60 3137BM6P6 FHLMC SERIES K721 A2 3.09% 8/1/2022 46,522.603/1/2022 3/25/2022 247,013.24 3137BLUR7 FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P 2.71% 6/1/2022 247,013.243/1/2022 3/25/2022 74,566.97 3137FQ3V3 FHMS KJ27 A1 2.09% 7/1/2024 74,566.97 49 ATTACHMENT A
267
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
PAYDOWNS3/15/2022 3/15/2022 99,063.28 65479HAC1 NAROT 2019-B A3 2.50% 11/15/2023 99,063.283/15/2022 3/15/2022 74,634.97 44932NAD2 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2.66% 6/15/2023 74,634.973/15/2022 3/15/2022 92,165.39 14315XAC2 CARMX 2020-1 A3 1.89% 12/16/2024 92,165.393/15/2022 3/15/2022 208,152.06 89232HAC9 TAOT 2020-A A3 1.66% 5/15/2024 208,152.063/15/2022 3/15/2022 50,293.90 14042WAC4 COPAR 2019-1 A3 2.51% 11/15/2023 50,293.903/15/2022 3/15/2022 99,860.02 65479KAD2 NAROT 2019-A A3 2.90% 10/15/2023 99,860.023/15/2022 3/15/2022 36,320.66 65479GAD1 NAROT 2018-B A3 3.06% 3/15/2023 36,320.663/15/2022 3/15/2022 61,499.42 65479CAD0 NAROT 2020-B A3 0.55% 7/15/2024 61,499.423/15/2022 3/15/2022 66,358.42 14316LAC7 CARMX 2019-2 A3 2.68% 3/15/2024 66,358.423/18/2022 3/18/2022 46,081.93 43814WAC9 HAROT 2019-1 A3 2.83% 3/20/2023 46,081.933/21/2022 3/21/2022 99,959.50 43815MAC0 HAROT 2019-2 A3 2.52% 6/21/2023 99,959.50 Total PAYDOWNS 4,094,889.34 4,094,889.34 0.00
SELL1/4/2022 1/6/2022 2,990,000.00 912828Z86 US TREASURY NOTES 1.37% 2/15/2023 3,036,337.89 11,294.191/4/2022 1/6/2022 245,000.00 912828P38 US TREASURY NOTES 1.75% 1/31/2023 250,259.51 6,307.401/4/2022 1/6/2022 2,000,000.00 92826CAG7 VISA INC (CALLABLE) NOTE 2.15% 9/15/2022 2,034,838.33 35,079.771/5/2022 1/6/2022 6,040,000.00 91282CBM2 US TREASURY NOTES 0.12% 2/15/2024 5,955,657.48 -64,512.94 50 ATTACHMENT A
268
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
SELL1/6/2022 1/6/2022 150,000.00 912828Q29 US TREASURY NOTES 1.50% 3/31/2023 152,340.15 3,379.541/27/2022 1/31/2022 1,800,000.00 91282CCF6 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.75% 5/31/2026 1,737,822.89 -61,059.881/31/2022 1/31/2022 685,000.00 91282CCF6 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.75% 5/31/2026 661,873.31 -22,701.522/2/2022 2/3/2022 5,835,000.00 037833CQ1 APPLE INC CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE 2.30% 5/11/2022 5,888,383.77 23,241.832/2/2022 2/3/2022 10,000,000.00 9128284D9 US TREASURY NOTES 2.50% 3/31/2023 10,275,210.34 73,641.182/4/2022 2/7/2022 805,000.00 912828Q29 US TREASURY NOTES 1.50% 3/31/2023 814,123.63 13,010.912/18/2022 2/22/2022 3,145,000.00 91282CBX8 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 0.12% 4/30/2023 3,105,697.00 -37,752.652/18/2022 2/22/2022 2,895,000.00 912828Q29 US TREASURY NOTES 1.50% 3/31/2023 2,922,249.98 38,379.483/8/2022 3/10/2022 3,650,000.00 3137EAER6 FREDDIE MAC NOTES 0.37% 5/5/2023 3,612,923.60 -44,280.643/14/2022 3/15/2022 2,000,000.00 3137EAER6 FREDDIE MAC NOTES 0.37% 5/5/2023 1,976,768.33 -27,267.413/17/2022 3/22/2022 2,635,000.00 3137EAER6 FREDDIE MAC NOTES 0.37% 5/5/2023 2,603,899.31 -36,580.483/21/2022 3/22/2022 2,000,000.00 912828S92 US TREASURY NOTES 1.25% 7/31/2023 1,987,281.17 14,281.35 Total SELL 46,875,000.00 47,015,666.69 -75,539.87
51 ATTACHMENT A
269
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Portfolio Review:

CITY OF STOCKTON SHORT-TERM PORTFOLIO

ATTACHMENT A
270
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

An average of each security’s credit rating was assigned a numeric value and adjusted for its relative weighting in the portfolio.

1. Portfolio Snapshot - CITY OF STOCKTON SHORT-TERM PORTFOLIO¹ Credit Quality - S&P
100%
0%
20%40%60%80%
100%120%
0-1 Yr
Portfolio
Duration Distribution
Commercial Paper | 100%
Sector Allocation
A-1+ | 33%A-1 | 67%
Portfolio Statistics
Portfolio Effective Duration
Yield At CostYield At MarketPortfolio Credit Quality
Total Market Value
Securities Sub-TotalCash
$29,939,490.00
$29,939,490.00
$0.00
$0.00

0.22 years

0.70%0.93%
A
Accrued Interest
53 ATTACHMENT A
271
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

Issuer Diversification - CITY OF STOCKTON SHORT-TERM PORTFOLIO Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchCommercial Paper 100.0% LMA AMERICAS LLC 33.3% A / Aa / AAMANHATTAN ASSET FUNDING CO LLC 33.3% A / Aa / NROLD LINE FUNDING LLC 33.3% AA / Aa / AA Total 100.0%
54 ATTACHMENT A
272
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Characteristics
|
$0$6
$12$18$24$30
$0$6
$12$18$24$30
$0$6
$12$18$24$30
$0.0$6.0
$12.0$18.0$24.0$30.0
Millions
March 2022
Sector Allocation Review - CITY OF STOCKTON SHORT-TERM PORTFOLIO Commercial Paper
Market values, including accrued interest. Only includes investments held within the separately managed account(s), excludes cash held in funds not managed by PFMAM. Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Security Type Mar-22 % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total Commercial Paper $29.9 100.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0%Total $29.9 100.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% 55 ATTACHMENT A
273
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Portfolio Activity
|
Portfolio Activity - CITY OF STOCKTON SHORT-TERM PORTFOLIO Net Activity by Sector
($ millions)
Commercial PaperCommercial Paper
$0.0 $5.0 $10.0 $15.0 $20.0 $25.0 $30.0
Based on total proceeds (principal and accrued interest) of buys, sells, maturities, and principal paydowns. Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Sector Net ActivityCommercial Paper $29,939,125Total Net Activity $29,939,125 Sales/Maturities Purchases
56 ATTACHMENT A
274
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

0.70 0.70%
Total Investments $29,939,490.00
57 ATTACHMENT A
275
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Appendix
|
Important Disclosures
This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or a specific recommendation, as it was prepared without regard to any specific objectives or financial circumstances.Investment advisory services are provided by PFM Asset Management LLC ("PFMAM"), an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"). USBAM is a subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank"). U.S. Bankis a separate entity and subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. The information contained is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities. Additional applicable regulatory information is available upon request.PFMAM professionals have exercised reasonable professional care in the preparation of this performance report. Information in this report is obtained from sourcesexternal to PFMAM and is generally believed to be reliable and available to the public; however, we cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness or suitability. We rely on the client's custodian for security holdings and market values. Transaction dates reported by the custodian may differ from money manager statements. While efforts are made to ensure the data contained herein is accurate and complete, we disclaim all responsibility for any errors that may occur. References to particular issuers arefor illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be recommendations or advice regarding such issuers. Fixed income manager and index characteristics are gathered from external sources. When average credit quality is not available, it is estimated by taking the market value weights of individual credit tiers on the portion ofthe strategy rated by a NRSRO.It is not possible to invest directly in an index. The index returns shown throughout this material do not represent the results of actual trading of investor assets.

Third-party providers maintain the indices shown and calculate the index levels and performance shown or discussed. Index returns do not reflect payment of any salescharges or fees an investor would pay to purchase the securities they represent. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause investment performance to belower than the performance shown.The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of PFMAM at the time of distribution and are subject to change. Any forecast,projection, or prediction of the market, the economy, economic trends, and equity or fixed-income markets are based upon certain assumptions and current opinion asof the date of issue and are also subject to change. Some, but not all assumptions are noted in the report. Assumptions may or may not be proven correct as actualevents occur, and results may depend on events outside of your or our control. Changes in assumptions may have a material effect on results. Opinions and datapresented are not necessarily indicative of future events or expected performance.For more information regarding PFMAM's services or entities, please visit www.pfmam.com.© 2022 PFM Asset Management LLC. Further distribution is not permitted without prior written consent. 59 ATTACHMENT A
277
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Appendix
|
Important Disclosures
Market values that include accrued interest are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by Refinitiv, Bloomberg, or Telerate. Where prices are not available from generally recognized sources, the securities are priced using a yield-based matrix system to arrive at an estimatedmarket value.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, information is presented on a trade date basis; forward settling purchases are included in the monthly balances, and forward settling sales are excluded.

Performance is presented in accordance with the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). Unless otherwise noted, performance is showngross of fees. Quarterly returns are presented on an unannualized basis. Returns for periods greater than one year are presented on an annualized basis. Past performance is not indicative of future returns.

Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Indices provided by Bloomberg Financial Markets.Money market fund/cash balances are included in performance and duration computations.Standard & Poor's is the source of the credit ratings. Distribution of credit rating is exclusive of money market fund/LGIP holdings.Callable securities in the portfolio are included in the maturity distribution analysis to their stated maturity date, although, they may be called prior to maturity.MBS maturities are represented by expected average life. 60 ATTACHMENT A
278
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Appendix
|
Glossary
Accrued Interest: Interest that is due on a bond or other fixed income security since the last interest payment was made.Agencies: Federal agency securities and/or Government-sponsored enterprises.Amortized Cost: The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short-term securities (those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a straight line basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer-term securities is amortized using the constant yield basis.

Asset-Backed Security: A financial instrument collateralized by an underlying pool of assets – usually ones that generate a cash flow from debt, such as loans, leases, credit card balances, and receivables.

Bankers’ Acceptance: A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill as well as the insurer.Commercial Paper: An unsecured obligation issued by a corporation or bank to finance its short-term credit needs, such as accounts receivable and inventory.Contribution to Total Return: The weight of each individual security multiplied by its return, then summed for each sector to determine how much each sector addedor subtracted from the overall portfolio performance.Effective Duration: A measure of the sensitivity of a security’s price to a change in interest rates, stated in years.Effective Yield: The total yield an investor receives in relation to the nominal yield or coupon of a bond. Effective yield takes into account the power of compoundingon investment returns, while nominal yield does not.FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. A federal agency that insures bank deposits to a specified amount.Interest Rate: Interest per year divided by principal amount and expressed as a percentage.Market Value: The value that would be received or paid for an investment in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.Maturity: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable.Negotiable Certificates of Deposit: A CD with a very large denomination, usually $1 million or more, that can be traded in secondary markets.Par Value: The nominal dollar face amount of a security.Pass-through Security: A security representing pooled debt obligations that passes income from debtors to its shareholders. The most common type is themortgage-backed security. 61 ATTACHMENT A
279
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com

CITY OF STOCKTON
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2022
Appendix
|
Glossary
Repurchase Agreements: A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date.Settle Date: The date on which the transaction is settled and monies/securities are exchanged. If the settle date of the transaction (i.e., coupon payments andmaturity proceeds) occurs on a non-business day, the funds are exchanged on the next business day.Supranational: A multinational union or association in which member countries cede authority and sovereignty on at least some internal matters to the group, whosedecisions are binding on its members.Trade Date: The date on which the transaction occurred; however, the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.Unsettled Trade: A trade which has been executed; however, the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.U.S. Treasury: The department of the U.S. government that issues Treasury securities.Yield: The rate of return based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis.

YTM at Cost: The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return based on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time periodfrom purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis.YTM at Market: The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the timeperiod remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis. 62 ATTACHMENT A
280
ATTACHMENT B 281
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0495, Version: 1

APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the minutes from the City Council meeting of March 22, 2022 Attachment A - 2022-03-22 Minutes
City of Stockton Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
282
Attachment A 283
Attachment A 284
Attachment A 285
Attachment A 286
Attachment A 287
Attachment A 288
Attachment A 289
Attachment A 290
Attachment A 291
Attachment A 292
Attachment A 293
Attachment A 294
Attachment A 295
Attachment A 296
Attachment A 297
Attachment A 298
Attachment A 299
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0531, Version: 1

REJECT ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR AI/CHATBOT CUSTOMER SERVICE AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ENHANCEMENTS (PUR-22-006)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to reject all bids received on March 31, 2022, for the AI/ChatBot Customer Service and Community Engagement Enhancements (PUR-22- 006) in accordance with Stockton Municipal Code 3.68.160(B).

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.

Summary
The main source of information for and about the City of Stockton is its website. The City of Stockton has had a website since 1999. The core website was redesigned by city staff in 2011 using HTML and is hosted on a secure server with an SSL certificate in the City’s Information Technology Department. The Home page and Stockton Police Department webpages were redesigned in 2016 on an ASP.NET platform; these pages are currently redirected and hosted remotely on a vendor’s server. These combined platforms are comprised of approximately 800 webpages.

The current site does not fully satisfy accessibility goals/requirements and fails to take advantage of the latest technological advances that are important to community members, businesses, and visitors - our customers. Additionally, the core site and hosted pages are not integrated and do not display properly on some browsers and mobile devices.

DISCUSSION
Background
In 2007, the City of Stockton added a Customer Response Management System (CRMS), referred to as Ask Stockton. This system allows customers to seek answers to questions by topic areas and submit service requests for a variety of City-provided programs and services. A mobile app for Ask Stockton was launched in 2020.

The City is currently considering a complete redesign of its entire website and is seeking enhancements through AI/Chatbot service that will improve customer service through convenience, while providing data for the City’s website redesign that will tell us what information customers are seeking. This information will help us improve our website content on the current platform and maintain quality content and Search Engine Optimization (SEO) on any future website platform.

City of Stockton Page 1 of 2 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
300
File #: 22-0531, Version: 1
Present Situation
The City Manager’s Office advertised an Invitation for Sealed Bids on March 10, 2022. On March 31, 2022, eight (8) bids were received by the City Clerk.

Staff has reviewed the submissions and determined that this project was advertised using an inappropriate procurement method which is not conducive to the scope of work specifications required for a technology project. Evaluation of only the cost of the services did not allow the City the flexibility to consider other qualifications important to such technology projects, such as the transition and integration process and the professional qualifications necessary for internal training.

Staff will evaluate other procurement methodologies including RFPs and sole source assessments to determine the best selection process.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
There is no impact to the General Fund, or any other unrestricted funds, from this action.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 2 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
301
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0367, Version: 1

ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR CANNERY PARK, UNIT NO. 7 (VILLAGE F2) TRACT NO. 3688 PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve the final map for Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688;

3. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Summary
The proposed resolution approves the final map and authorizes the City Manager to execute a Subdivision Agreement between LGI Homes - California, LLC, accept all offers of dedication, and record the map for Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688. The subdivision contains

16.73 acres divided into 85 lots for the construction of single-family residential homes and right-ofway dedication. The final map complies with the Tentative Maps (TM 8-04 A&B) approved by the Planning Commission on August 12, 2004, and approved development conditions. The proposed property subdivision is located south of Bear Creek and east of Union Pacific Railroad (Attachment A - Vicinity Map).

Review and approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement are necessary to ensure the Tentative Map conditions have been fulfilled. If the final map is approved by the City Council, the City will transmit the map and Subdivision Agreement to the County Recorder. It is recommended that Council adopt the proposed resolution as LGI Homes - California, LLC fulfilled all necessary conditions.

DISCUSSION
Background
On August 12, 2004, the Planning Commission approved a Small Lot and Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (TM 8-04 A&B) for the Cannery Park Mixed Use Project and recommended that City Council approve an Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Eight Mile Road Specific Plan Amendment, Annexation, Pre-zoning and Development Agreement. On September 14, City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
302
File #: 22-0367, Version: 1
2004, City Council approved the Planning Commission and Staff recommendations. The Project proposed to develop a 448-acre project site with 1,100 single-family lots, 210 multi-family units, commercial retail and office, industrial, parks, a school and a fire station.

The Tentative Small Lot Map 8-04A shows how the proposed site would be divided up into smaller parcels creating the residential lots, a lot for multi-family, 49 lots for light industrial and commercial, and lots for the fire station, parks, school, and various accessory lots. The Tentative Large Lot Map shows how the proposed site would be divided up into 17 large lots to provide the developer an opportunity to sell larger blocks of developable land off while site development is underway. The tentative maps were approved subject to specified conditions to be met upon subdivision of the project site.

The City Council approved the formation of the Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2019-1 for Cannery Park II to levy Special Taxes within the CFD to finance the construction of capital infrastructure and on-going services related to police, fire, parks, roads, and open space.

Up to the present time, City Council has approved eight final maps that created 840 residential lots, a school, public rights-of-ways, and easements.

Present Situation
LGI Homes - California, LLC submitted the final map to complete the subdivision process for the earlier approved Tentative Maps. The subdivision name is Cannery Park Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688, and will subdivide the 16.73-acre project site into 85 lots for the construction of singlefamily residential homes and street right-of-way. The residential lot sizes, ranging from 5,500 to 15,576 square feet, will be provided access through the project site to public streets.

Staff reviewed the Final Map and Subdivision applications and determined that all conditions necessary for approval are met. This includes preparing improvement plans for all proposed public streets and utilities to be constructed within the subdivision, dedicating right-of-way easements, paying proportionate share fees towards off-site improvement costs, and posting security bonds to guarantee the subdivision improvements.

The final map was reviewed by the City Engineer for technical accuracy, substantial conformance with the approved tentative maps, and the required conditions are completed or incorporated within a subdivision agreement. The City Engineer recommends forwarding the final map, subdivision agreement, and any offers of dedication to the City Council for consideration and approval.

The subdivision agreement (Exhibit 1 to the proposed resolution) contains the developer’s obligations for project site development. The proposed resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement, accept on behalf of the public all offers of dedication and authorizes recordation of the final map. It is recommended that Council adopt the proposed resolution as LGI Homes - California, LLC fulfilled all necessary conditions.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The costs of creating the subdivision agreement, including plan checking, inspection, map filing, and computer mapping services provided by City staff, have been paid by the subdivider in the amount of City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
303
File #: 22-0367, Version: 1
$98,402.20 and deposited in various fee accounts in the Development Services Fund and Street Sign Public Facility Fee Fund. These fees and deposits are described in detail in Exhibit A of the Subdivision Agreement. All other fees will be assessed at the time building permits are issued.

Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2) will be incorporated into CFD No. 2019-1, which provides funding for the necessary infrastructure improvements and on-going City services related to police, fire, parks, roads, and open space to support the project development. There is no financial impact to the City because of the execution of the subdivision agreement. The developer bears the costs to construct the required infrastructure improvements and development of the subdivision and addresses with the formation of the community facilities district.

Attachment A - Vicinity Map
City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
304
REV. DATE
CK. BY DRAWING NO.

CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY
SCALE
NO. BY APRVD.

DWG. BY

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

CITY OF STOCKTON DATE
Cannery Park, Unit 7
(Village F2) Vicinity Map
N
Attachment A 305
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC ALL

OFFERS OF DEDICATION, AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP FOR CANNERY PARK, UNIT NO. 7 (VILLAGE F2) - TRACT NO. 3688 Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688 is located south of Bear Creek and east of Union Pacific Railroad; and
The project will subdivide an approximately 16.73-acre project site into 85 lots for the construction of single-family homes; and
The subdivider is LGI Homes - California, LLC. (Subdivider); and The Subdivider has submitted the Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688, Final Map for approval; and
Staff reviewed the Final Map and Subdivision applications and determined that all conditions necessary for approval have been met, which includes; preparing improvement plans for all proposed public streets and utilities to be constructed within the subdivision unit, dedicating right of way easements, and posting security bonds to guarantee the subdivision improvements; and
The subdivision agreement contains the subdivider’s obligations for project site development; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Stockton a Subdivision Agreement outlining conditions for the approval of Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by this reference.

2. The certain Final Map, consisting of six sheets, entitled Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 (Village F2), Tract No. 3688 filed with the City Clerk on May 24, 2022, is hereby approved as and for the Final Map of that certain subdivision known as Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 – (Village F2) Tract No. 3688, Stockton, California, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 2 and incorporated by reference.

3. The City Council hereby accepts on behalf of the public all offers of dedication for the purposes designated and authorizes recordation of the map. 306

4. The approval and acceptance by the City on behalf of the public of Tract No. 3688, Subdivisions of San Joaquin County, Cannery Park, Unit No. 7 – Village F2, is subject to the owner or owners constructing all public improvements required by the Community Development Department and the payment of all fees required under Chapter 16, Division 4, of the Stockton Municipal Code, and subject to the owner or owners submitting to the City of Stockton the final map of the subdivision approved by the County Surveyor indicating conformance to the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California.

5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to sign and have recorded said subdivision map when same is submitted to the City, bearing said approval of the County Surveyor, and is approved by the City Engineer.

6. The City Manager is authorized to take such other actions as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED May 24, 2022 .

KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
307
EXHIBIT 1 308
EXHIBIT 1 309
EXHIBIT 1 310
EXHIBIT 1 311
EXHIBIT 1 312
EXHIBIT 1 313
EXHIBIT 1 314
EXHIBIT 1 315
EXHIBIT 1 316
EXHIBIT 1 317
EXHIBIT 1 318
EXHIBIT 1 319
EXHIBIT 1 320
EXHIBIT 1 321
EXHIBIT 1 322
EXHIBIT 1 323
EXHIBIT 1 324
EXHIBIT 1 325
EXHIBIT 1 326
EXHIBIT 1 327
EXHIBIT 1 328
EXHIBIT 1 329
EXHIBIT 1 330
EXHIBIT 1 331
EXHIBIT 1 332
EXHIBIT 1 333
EXHIBIT 1 334
EXHIBIT 1 335
EXHIBIT 1 336
EXHIBIT 1 337
EXHIBIT 1 338
EXHIBIT 1 339
EXHIBIT 1 340
EXHIBIT 1 341
EXHIBIT 1 342
EXHIBIT 1 343
EXHIBIT 1 344
EXHIBIT 1 345
EXHIBIT 1 346
EXHIBIT 1 347
EXHIBIT 1 348
EXHIBIT 1 349
EXHIBIT 1 350
EXHIBIT 1 351
EXHIBIT 1 352
EXHIBIT 1 353
EXHIBIT 1 354
EXHIBIT 1 355
EXHIBIT 1 356
EXHIBIT 1 357
EXHIBIT 1 358
EXHIBIT 1 359
EXHIBIT 1 360
EXHIBIT 1 361
EXHIBIT 1 362
EXHIBIT 1 363
EXHIBIT 1 364
EXHIBIT 1 365
EXHIBIT 1 366
EXHIBIT 1 367
EXHIBIT 1 368
EXHIBIT 1 369
EXHIBIT 1 370
EXHIBIT 1 371
EXHIBIT 1 372
EXHIBIT 1 373
EXHIBIT 1 374
EXHIBIT 1 375
EXHIBIT 2 376
EXHIBIT 2 377
EXHIBIT 2 378
EXHIBIT 2 379
EXHIBIT 2 380
EXHIBIT 2 381
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0396, Version: 1

ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR THE WESTLAKE VILLAGES, UNIT NO. 10 - VILLAGE K (TRACT NO. 3577) PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve the final map for Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 - Village K, Tract No. 3577;

3. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Summary
The proposed resolution approves the final map and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Subdivision Agreement between Stockton Westlake Investment LLC, accept all offers of dedication, and recordation of the map for Westlake Villages Unit No. 10 - Village K, Tract No. 3577. The subdivision contains 24.44 acres divided into 145 lots for the construction of single-family residential homes, three non-residential lots and right-of-way dedication.

Review and approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement are necessary to ensure the conditions of the Development Agreement and Tentative Map have been fulfilled. If the final map is approved by the City Council, the City will transmit the map and Subdivision Agreement to the County Recorder for recordation. It is recommended that Council adopt the proposed resolution as Stockton Westlake Investment LLC has fulfilled all necessary conditions.

DISCUSSION
Background
On September 14, 2004, the City Council approved development applications for Spanos Family Partnership for an approximate 681-acre project site located south of Eight Mile Road, west of Spanos Park West and Interstate 5, north of Pixley and Disappointment Sloughs, and east of Bishop Cut bridge and Rio Blanco Road (Attachment A - Vicinity Map). Council approvals included an Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Development Agreement, Pre-zoning for mixed-use, Annexation application, and a Master Development Plan to facilitate a residential community consisting of 2,630 single-family residential homes, commercial space, school, parks, and fire station within a setting of man-made lakes.

City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
382
File #: 22-0396, Version: 1
On October 14, 2004, the City Planning Commission approved two Tentative Maps (TM 18-04 A & B) for a proposed property subdivision of the Westlake Villages Project site. Tentative Map 18-04A showed how the proposed site would be divided up into smaller parcels creating the 2,630 residential lots (792 of which were intended for an active adult community) and lots for the fire station, parks, school, landscaping, lake, and various accessory lots. Tentative Map 18-04B proposed how the site would be divided up into 30 large lots to provide the developer an opportunity to sell off larger blocks of developable land while site development is underway. The tentative maps were approved subject to specified conditions to be met upon subdivision of the project site.

In 2018, the City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2018-2 for Westlake Villages II to levy Special Taxes within the CFD to finance the construction of capital infrastructure and ongoing services related to police, fire, parks, roads, and open space.

To date, the City Council has approved twelve (12) final maps, creating 1,174 residential parcels, four (4) private parks, private access roads, and public rights-of-way and easements.

Present Situation
Stockton Westlake Investment LLC submitted a final map for Unit No. 10 - Village K to complete the subdivision process for the earlier approved Tentative Maps. The final map will subdivide an approximately 24.44-acre project site into 145 residential lots, three non-residential lots (A, B, and C) for emergency vehicle access (EVA) and utility easement and street right-of-way dedication. The residential lot sizes, ranging in size from 4,500 to 26,655 square feet, will be provided access through the project site via public streets.

Staff reviewed the Final Map and Subdivision applications and determined that all conditions necessary for approval have been met. This includes preparing improvement plans for all proposed public streets and utilities to be constructed within the subdivision, dedicating right-of-way easements, paying proportionate share fees towards off-site improvement costs, and posting security bonds to guarantee the subdivision improvements.

The City Engineer reviewed the final map for technical accuracy and substantial conformance with approved tentative maps and recommends forwarding the final map, subdivision agreement, and any offers of dedication to the City Council for consideration and approval.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The costs of creating the subdivision agreement, including plan checking, inspection, map filing, and computer mapping services provided by City staff have been paid by the subdivider in the amount of $225,283.98 and deposited in various development fee accounts in the Development Services Fund and Street Sign Public Facility Fee Fund. These fees are described in detail in Exhibit A of the Subdivision Agreement. All other fees will be assessed at the time building permits are issued.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
383
File #: 22-0396, Version: 1
Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 - Village K will be incorporated into CFD No. 2018-2, which provides funding for the necessary subdivision infrastructure improvements and ongoing City services to support project development. The new fire station proposed within the Westlake Villages Development would be constructed in a future development phase when needed to address the residential demand. There is no financial impact to the City because of the execution of the subdivision agreement. The costs to construct the required infrastructure improvements and develop the subdivision are borne by the developer and addressed with the formation of the community facilities district.

Attachment A - Vicinity Map
City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
384
REV. DATE
CK. BY DRAWING NO.

CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY
SCALE
NO. BY APRVD.

DWG. BY

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

CITY OF STOCKTON DATE
Westlake Villages #10
(Village K) Vicinity Map
N

ATTACHMENT A
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT,

ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC ALL OFFERS OF DEDICATION, AND

AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP FOR WESTLAKE VILLAGES, UNIT NO. 10 - VILLAGE K (TRACT NO. 3577)
Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 – Village K (Tract No. 3577), is located south of Eight Mile Road and west of Interstate 5; and
The project will subdivide an approximately 24.44-acre project site into 145 lots for the construction of single-family homes, three non-residential lots, and right-of-way dedication; and
The subdivider is Stockton Westlake Investment LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (Subdivider); and
The Subdivider has submitted the Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 – Village K (Tract No. 3577), Final Map for approval; and
Staff reviewed the Final Map and Subdivision applications and determined that all conditions necessary for approval have been met, which includes preparing improvement plans for all proposed public streets and utilities to be constructed within the subdivision unit, dedicating right of way easements, and posting security bonds to guarantee the subdivision improvements; and
The subdivision agreement contains the subdivider’s obligations for project site development; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Stockton a Subdivision Agreement outlining conditions for the approval of Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 – Village K (Tract No. 3577), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by this reference.

2. The certain Final Map, consisting of five sheets, entitled Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 – Village K (Tract No. 3577), filed with the City Clerk on May 24, 2022, is hereby approved as and for the Final Map of that certain subdivision known as Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 – Village K (Tract No. 3577), Stockton, California, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 2 and incorporated by reference. 386

3. The City Council hereby accepts on behalf of the public all offers of dedication for the purposes designated and authorizes recordation of the map.

4. The approval and acceptance by the City on behalf of the public of Tract No. 3577, Subdivisions of San Joaquin County, Westlake Villages, Unit No. 10 – Village K, is subject to the owner or owners constructing all public improvements required by the Community Development Department and the payment of all fees required under Chapter 16, Division 4, of the Stockton Municipal Code, and subject to the owner or owners submitting to the City of Stockton the final map of the subdivision approved by the County Surveyor indicating conformance to the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California.

6. The City Manager is authorized to take such other actions as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED May 24, 2022 .

KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
387
EXHIBIT 1 388
EXHIBIT 1 389
EXHIBIT 1 390
EXHIBIT 1 391
EXHIBIT 1 392
EXHIBIT 1 393
EXHIBIT 1 394
EXHIBIT 1 395
EXHIBIT 1 396
EXHIBIT 1 397
EXHIBIT 1 398
EXHIBIT 1 399
EXHIBIT 1 400
EXHIBIT 1 401
EXHIBIT 1 402
EXHIBIT 1 403
EXHIBIT 1 404
EXHIBIT 1 405
EXHIBIT 1 406
EXHIBIT 1 407
EXHIBIT 1 408
EXHIBIT 1 409
EXHIBIT 1 410
EXHIBIT 1 411
EXHIBIT 1 412
EXHIBIT 1 413
EXHIBIT 1 414
EXHIBIT 1 415
EXHIBIT 1 416
EXHIBIT 1 417
EXHIBIT 1 418
EXHIBIT 2 419
Δ ΔΔ Δ Δ N
100 50 0 100 200
SCALE: 1" = 100'

WESTLAKE VILLAGES,
UNIT 1A, LOT 5
43-M.&P.-195 Δ SCOTT CREEK DRIVE LAKE DRIVE
PARCEL 3
17-PM-171 Δ Δ WEST

ROBINS COVE DRIVE

WAKEBY WAY LUBEC DRIVE LUBEC DRIVE BASS HOLLOW LANE BASS HOLLOW LANE TOWER HILL DRIVE TOWER HILL DRIVE

BURGESS PARK LANE COVELL BEACH LANE
EXHIBIT 2 420
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ

WESTLAKE VILLAGES,
UNIT 1A, LOT 5
43-M.&P.-195

WESTLAKE VILLAGES,
UNIT 1A, LOT 6
43-M.&P.-195
N
60 30 0 60 120
SCALE: 1" = 60'

WESTLAKE DRIVE
Δ

BURGESS PARK LANE
COVELL

WAKEBY WAY

BASS HOLLOW LANE

LUBEC DRIVE

TOWER HILL DRIVE

BEACH LANE
EXHIBIT 2 421
Δ
Δ

WESTLAKE VILLAGES,
UNIT 1A, LOT 5
43-M.&P.-195
N
60 30 0 60 120
SCALE: 1" = 60'

SCOTT CREEK DRIVE
PARCEL 3
17-PM-171

WESTLAKE DRIVE
Δ
Δ

ROBINS COVE DRIVE

WAKEBY WAY BASS HOLLOW LANE LUBEC DRIVE

TOWER HILL DRIVE
EXHIBIT 2 422
EXHIBIT 2 423
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0450, Version: 1

ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RELINQUISHMENT OF RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG THE PORTION OF PROPERTY FRONTAGE AT 4850 S. STATE ROUTE 99 E. FRONTAGE ROAD

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve relinquishing restricted access of a thirty-foot (30’) portion of property frontage at 4850 S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road.

2. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Summary
Approval of the requested action allows new viable driveway access to an approved 4.98-acre project site for a commercial truck fueling station with car wash and convenience store located at 4850 S.

State Route 99 E. Frontage Road (Attachment A - Vicinity Map). The property owner, GINI Company, LLC, is requesting the portion of the restricted access along the project site’s frontage be removed to fit in a thirty-foot (30’) driveway access to the project site. Staff reviewed the request and recommends relinquishing restricted access that enables driveway access from the public street.

DISCUSSION
Background
The project site located at 4850 S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road is a 4.98-acre vacant lot designated as a commercial zone. The project site is approved to develop a commercial truck fueling station, consisting of seven truck fueling stations that can simultaneously serve 14 trucks, six fueling stations for passenger vehicles that can simultaneously serve 12 passenger vehicles, a carwash, and a 4,670 square foot convenience store.

A final subdivision map, recorded with the San Joaquin County Recorder, identified the access restriction along the east side of S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road that included the frontage of the project site. Generally, the basis of the restriction was to keep driveways a safe distance away from intersections to ensure driveway turning movements do not conflict with turning movements at the nearby intersection and are not visually impaired by structures or roadway curves.

The Development Code changes in 2004 included specifications for driveway access and distances from intersections and obstructions that removed the practice of restricting access for individual City of Stockton Page 1 of 2 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
424
File #: 22-0450, Version: 1
parcels on subdivision maps and made it easier for city staff to review driveway access and consider development applications in accordance with Code standards.

Present Situation
The property owner, GINI Company, LLC, is requesting the City’s relinquishment of restricted access along the portion of S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road to allow for a driveway access point that will better serve the mixed vehicle type needs at the site. A thirty-foot (30’) long strip within the restricted portion of the east side of S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road is requested to be relinquished.

Staff reviewed the property owner’s request and recommended approval to allow the 30’ driveway access along S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road Street to facilitate improved access point and onsite traffic circulation. A City Encroachment Permit will be required for the new driveway access to ensure construction is per city standards.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The owner has paid the appropriate application fee to process the relinquishment of restricted access. There will be no financial impact to the City if the requested action is approved.

Attachment A - Vicinity Map
City of Stockton Page 2 of 2 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
425
1" = 424.7960846997173 ft
Attachment A
VICINITY MAP - 4850 S. STATE ROUTE 99 E. FRONTAGE RD.
426
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RELINQUISHMENT OF RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG THE PORTION OF PROPERTY FRONTAGE AT 4850 S. STATE ROUTE 99 E. FRONTAGE ROAD
The project site at 4850 S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road is approved to develop a commercial truck fueling station, with car wash and convenience store; and The legal property was established by a subdivision map recorded on December 2, 2004, where access restriction was placed along the portion of the east side of S. State Route 99 E. Frontage that included the frontage of the project site; and The general basis of the restriction was to keep driveways a safe distance away from intersections to ensure driveway turning movements do not conflict with turning movements at the nearby intersection and are not visually impaired by structures or roadway curves; and
The Development Code changes in 2004 included specifications for driveway access and distances from intersections and obstructions that removed the practice of restricting access for individual parcels on subdivision maps; and The property owner, GINI Company, LLC, requests relinquishment of restricted access along the portion of the east side of S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road to allow for a thirty-foot (30’) driveway access point at the project site’s frontage to facilitate improved access point and on-site traffic circulation: now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council hereby approves the Relinquishment of Restricted Access at 4850 S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road, a thirty-foot (30’) portion of property frontage along S. State Route 99 E. Frontage Road, attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by this reference, to allow driveway access from the public street. //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
427

2. The City Manager is authorized to take such other actions as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED May 24, 2022 .

KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
428
EXHIBIT 1 429
EXHIBIT 1 430
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0274, Version: 1

AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRMS FOR ON-CALL CONTRACT SUPPORT FOR

BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, AND

INSPECTION SERVICES

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with the following professional firms for on-call contract support for Building Code Plan Review, Structural Engineering Plan Review, and Inspection Services for a total not to exceed amount of $2,500,000 across the entire vendor pool:
· CSG Consultants, Inc., Foster City, CA
· BPR Consulting Group, LLC, El Dorado Hills, CA
It is further recommended that Council authorize the City Manager to take all necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the motion.

Summary
Due primarily to the cyclical nature of development, the Community Development Department (CDD) regularly contracts for various types of on-call services. It is the Department’s strategy to maintain a balance between permanent staff and on-call staff to support project types that are not consistent in volume from year-to-year. In the past, if workloads increased consistently in a three-year period, adding full-time staff was often considered as a solution. However, the Great Recession, and now COVID, have made predicting construction cycles more challenging. Therefore, it is the Department’s practice to fully staff more predictable project permit types and augment full-time City staff with oncall services on an as-needed basis.

In the past five years, the demand for building code plan review and inspection services has outpaced staffing levels. While the Department added four (4) full-time positions in the building safety group during that time, there continues to be increased demand for on-call building inspectors, plan examiners, and structural engineers during peak periods.

Further, the Department requires the services of an array of various experts that are not needed in a full-time capacity but are accessible through consultants. Structural Engineers and Certified Access Specialists (CASp), for example, are necessary for operations but are only needed on a case-bycase basis.

City of Stockton Page 1 of 4 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
431
File #: 22-0274, Version: 1
Lastly, the CDD faces additional challenges recruiting full-time staff, as the hiring market remains highly competitive, and positions have remained vacant for longer periods of time. On-call services provide a needed flexibility to address these challenges.

Staff recommends Council approve a motion to authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with the two (2) professional firms as detailed above for an initial three-year term with an option to extend the agreement for up to two additional one-year periods. The cost of additional on-call services is paid for by the permit fees collected for projects and there is no impact or additional cost to the general fund. Compensation under the proposed agreement is limited to a cumulative amount of $2,500,000 for all vendors.

DISCUSSION
Background
As part of fiscal year budget development, the continued use of consulting services was determined to be the most appropriate way to address increasing development activity and increased demand for Building Division services. These services include building code plan review, structural engineering plan review, and inspection services. Augmenting staff in this way allows the building workgroup greater flexibility to provide high-level customer service in response to the demands of cyclical development activity without reactively over-hiring permanent staff.

City Council approved a three-year Professional Services Master Agreement on June 20, 2017, and three subsequent amendments in 2018, 2019, and 2021 (Attachment A), with four (4) companies to provide on-call building plan review and inspection, engineering plan review, and floodplain management services. The approved compensation for services and reimbursable expenses totaled $2,100,000 across all consulting companies for the term of the contract. That current contract will expire on June 30, 2022.

Development activity increased substantially over the life of the current agreement (Table 1). Permit valuation has largely increased due to the volume, type, and complexity of projects as the economy improves. Although valuation for FY 2021-22 is projected at a slightly lower pace from that of FY 202 0-21, valuations remain robust.

Table 1. - Development Valuation 2017-2023
Fiscal Year Valuation
2017 - 18 $408 million
2018 - 19 $433 million
2019 - 20 $448 million
2020 - 21 $682 million
2021 - 22 $670 million (projected)
2022 - 23 $683 million (estimated)
Maintaining a Professional Services Agreement with several vendors affords the Department the ability to quickly change the scale and scope of staffing support levels to respond to workload City of Stockton Page 2 of 4 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
432
File #: 22-0274, Version: 1
demand while maintaining high levels of customer service. Fees are collected from the applicant before any plan review or inspection services are performed. Due to an improving economy and the tightening of the labor pool in specialized building services, having a pool of qualified firms will allow the City to provide a better spectrum of services and enable the Department to respond to short-term increases in building activity, staff vacancies, and adhere to established timelines, policies, and legal requirements.

In addition, several large and complex projects are anticipated over the course of the agreement including the City Hall Renovation at the Waterfront Towers, continued buildout of residential subdivisions, affordable housing developments, and several million square feet of industrial development. To properly support the projected construction activity with plan review and inspection services, the forecasted rate of expenditure is anticipated to require $2,500,000 over the term of the agreement.

Construction projections are based on permit activity trends and known projects. The estimates for the remainder of FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 assume a steadily high volume in permit activity and corresponding building valuations. As of April 12, 2022, there are 106 permits that are approved pending payment, with a combined valuation of $74 million. There are an additional 278 permits in for review with a combined valuation of $462 million.

Present Situation
On February 4, 2022, a Request For Proposals (RFP) was posted to the City’s Bid Flash web page.

Nine (9) RFP submittals were received on March 24, 2022, from the following vendors:
· 4LEAF, Inc., Fair Oaks, CA
· Bureau Veritas, Sacramento, CA
· BPR Consulting Group, El Dorado Hills, CA
· CSG Consultants, Sacramento, CA
· Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., Roseville, CA
· Shums Coda Associates, Inc., Pleasanton, CA
· TRB and Associates, Inc., San Ramon, CA
· Lakeside Consultants, Phoenix, AZ
· West Coast Code Consultants, San Ramon, CA
An evaluation panel reviewed the submissions and recommended two (2) out of the nine (9). The selection was based on the strength of the proposals, experience with the work required, understanding of Stockton Municipal and State Codes, ability to provide quality control checks, qualified staff, consultant capacity, customer service, and the total hourly rate cost to the City.

Each selected firm’s proposal, proposed staffing, and standard rate schedule for services, are included in Attachment B. The Professional Services Agreement (Attachment C) will apply to both firms for services over a three (3) year period, on an as-needed basis, with the total aggregate compensation paid to both firms not-to-exceed $2,500,000.

This level of contract capacity will allow the Department to adjust resources as necessary to provide high-quality, timely services. The CDD continues to implement process improvements while City of Stockton Page 3 of 4 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
433
File #: 22-0274, Version: 1
monitoring workload and demand to ensure that full-time and contract staffing levels are appropriately balanced, re-evaluating these needs annually. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement will allow the CDD to continue to meet service delivery goals in an efficient, timely, and professional manner.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Table 2 below outlines the expenditures for the current contract to-date. Based on the updated projections, current contract expenditure rate, and historical expenditures, there is a need for $2,5 00,000 across the vendor pool for the Professional Services Agreement to provide adequate service levels through FY 2024-25.

Table 2.

Total
Contract
Fiscal Year
2017-18
Fiscal Year
2018-19
Fiscal Year
2019-20
Fiscal Year
2020-21
Fiscal Year
2021-22
(through
February)
Remaining
Balance
Total
Amounts
$2,103,158 $270,406 $398,885 $371,350 $561,101 $239,760 $261,656 Pending adoption of the FY 2022-23 Annual Budget, funds will be available in the Development Services Fund, Community Development Department, Building and Life Safety division for $944,640.

The remaining $1,555,360 is expected to be appropriated and funded from the same account according to the schedule below in FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25. There is no impact to the General Fund, or any other unrestricted fund, from this action.

FY 2022-23: $944,640
FY 2023-24: $944,640
FY 2024-25: $610,720
TOTAL $2,500,000
Attachment A - 2017 Professional Services Master Agreement 2017-06-20-1103 NP Attachment B - Firm Proposals
Attachment C - Professional Services Agreement
City of Stockton Page 4 of 4 Printed on 5/18/2022
powered by Legistar™
434
Attachment A 435
Attachment A 436
Attachment A 437
Attachment A 438
Attachment A 439
Attachment A 440
Attachment A 441
Attachment A 442
Attachment A 443
Attachment A 444
Attachment A 445
Attachment A 446
Attachment A 447
Attachment A 448
Attachment A 449
Attachment A 450
Attachment A 451
Attachment A 452
Attachment A 453
Attachment A 454
Attachment A 455
Attachment A 456
Attachment A 457
Attachment A 458
Attachment A 459
Attachment A 460
Attachment A 461
Attachment A 462
Attachment A 463
Attachment A 464
Attachment A 465
Attachment A 466
Attachment A 467
Attachment A 468
Attachment A 469
Attachment A 470
Attachment A 471
Attachment A 472
Attachment A 473
Attachment A 474
Attachment A 475
Attachment A 476
Attachment A 477
Attachment A 478
Attachment A 479
Attachment A 480
Attachment A 481
Attachment A 482
Attachment A 483
Attachment A 484
Attachment A 485
Attachment A 486
Attachment A 487
Attachment A 488
Attachment A 489
Attachment A 490
Attachment A 491
Attachment A 492
Attachment A 493
Attachment A 494
Attachment A 495
Attachment A 496
Attachment A 497
Attachment A 498
Attachment A 499
Attachment A 500
Attachment A 501
Attachment A 502
Attachment A 503
Attachment A 504
Attachment A 505
Attachment A 506
Attachment A 507
Attachment A 508
Attachment A 509
Attachment A 510
Attachment A 511
Attachment A 512
Attachment A 513
Attachment A 514
Attachment A 515
Attachment A 516
Attachment A 517
Attachment A 518
Attachment A 519
Attachment A 520
Attachment A 521
Attachment A 522
Attachment A 523
Attachment A 524
Attachment A 525
Attachment A 526
Attachment A 527
Attachment A 528
Attachment A 529
Attachment A 530
Attachment A 531
Attachment A 532
Attachment A 533
Attachment A 534
Attachment A 535
Attachment A 536
Attachment A 537
Attachment A 538
Attachment A 539
Attachment A 540
Attachment A 541
Attachment A 542
Attachment A 543
Attachment A 544
Attachment A 545
Attachment A 546
Attachment A 547
Attachment A 548
Attachment A 549
Attachment A 550
Attachment A 551
Attachment A 552
Attachment A 553
Attachment A 554
Attachment A 555
Attachment A 556
Attachment A 557
Attachment A 558
Attachment A 559
Attachment A 560
Attachment A 561
Attachment A 562
Attachment A 563
Attachment A 564
Attachment A 565
Attachment A 566
Attachment A 567
Attachment A 568
Attachment A 569
Attachment A 570
Attachment A 571
Attachment A 572
Attachment A 573
Attachment A 574
Attachment A 575
Attachment A 576
Attachment A 577
Attachment A 578
Attachment A 579
Attachment A 580
Attachment A 581
Attachment A 582
Attachment A 583
Attachment A 584
Attachment A 585
Attachment A 586
Attachment A 587
Attachment A 588
Attachment A 589
Attachment A 590
Attachment A 591
Attachment A 592
Attachment A 593
Attachment A 594
Attachment A 595
Attachment A 596
Attachment A 597
Attachment A 598
Attachment A 599
Attachment A 600
Attachment A 601
Attachment A 602
Attachment A
603
Attachment A
604
Attachment A
605
Attachment A
606
Attachment A 607
Attachment A 608
Attachment A
609
Attachment A 610
Attachment A 611
Attachment A 612
Attachment A 613
Attachment A
614
Attachment A
615
Attachment A 616
Attachment A 617
Attachment A 618
Attachment A 619
Attachment A 620
Attachment A 621
Attachment A 622
Attachment A 623
Attachment A 624
Attachment A 625
Attachment A 626
Attachment A 627
Attachment A 628
Attachment A 629
Attachment A 630
Attachment A 631
Attachment A 632
Attachment A 633
Attachment A 634
Attachment A 635
Attachment A 636
Attachment A 637
Attachment A 638
Attachment A 639
Attachment A 640
Attachment A 641
Attachment A 642
Attachment A 643
Attachment A 644
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 21-0242, Version: 1

APPROVE A MOTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER ON-CALL BUILDING

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to authorize the City Manager to:

1. Amend the existing Professional Services Master Agreement with the following professional firms:
a. 4LEAF, Inc., Fair Oaks, CA;
b. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., Sacramento, CA;
c. CSG Consultants, Inc., Sacramento, CA;
d. West Coast Code Consultants, Inc., San Ramon, CA.

2. Increase funding by $400,000 for a revised total contract amount not to exceed $2,100,000 across the entire vendor pool; and

3. Exercise the second and final extension option of the contract for one (1) year.

It is also recommended that Council authorize the City Manager to take all necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the motion.

Summary
Community Development Departments typically contract for varied types of on-call services. This is due primarily to the cyclical nature of development. It is the Department’s strategy to maintain a balance between permanent staff and on-call staff for project types that are not consistent from year to year. In the past, if workloads increased consistently in a three-year period, adding full-time staff was considered. However, the Great Recession, and now COVID, has made predicting construction cycles more challenging. Therefore, it is the Department’s practice to fully staff more predictable project permit types and augment with on-call services as needed. In the past four years, the demand for building code plan review and inspection services has outpaced staffing levels. While the Department added three full-time positions in the building safety group during that time, there is still increased demand for on-call building inspectors, plan examiners, and structural engineers during peak periods. Furthermore, the Department has a need for specific expertise that is not needed in a full-time capacity. Structural Engineers and Certified Access Specialists (CASp), for example, are necessary for operations but are only needed on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, it is more logical to have these types of consultants on-call when needed.

In addition, the Department faces further challenges in that the market for full-time staff remains City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 5/4/2021
powered by Legistar™
Attachment A 645
File #: 21-0242, Version: 1
highly competitive and multiple positions have remained vacant for longer periods of time. On-call services provide a needed flexibility to address these challenges.

Staff recommends Council approve a motion to authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional Services Master Agreement with the four (4) professional firms as detailed above increasing the contract amount by $400,000 for a total amount not to exceed $2, 100,000 and exercise the second and final option to extend the agreement by one (1) year with an expiration date of June 30, 2022. The Department will initiate a request for proposals for new contract services before this contract expires in 2022. The cost of additional on-call services is paid for by the permit fees collected for projects and there is no impact or additional cost to the general fund.

DISCUSSION
Background
City Council approved a three-year Professional Services Master Agreement on June 20, 2017 (Attachment A), with four (4) companies to provide on-call building plan review and inspection, engineering plan review, and floodplain management services. The approved compensation for services and reimbursable expenses totaled $480,000 across all consulting companies for the term of the contract.

Development activity began increasing substantially following the execution of the original agreement (Table 1). To address this, in addition to the department adding full-time staff, City Council approved two contract amendments, one each in 2018 and 2019, increasing the contract amount to a new total of $1,700,000.

Table 1. - Development Valuation 2016-2022
Fiscal Year Valuation
2016 - 17 $308 million
2017 - 18 $408 million
2018 - 19 $433 million
2019 - 20 $448 million
2020 - 21 $600 million (estimated)
2021 - 22 $618 million (projected)
Staff utilized contract services during this time for plan reviews and inspections. In addition, several large projects are anticipated over the course of the next fiscal year including the City Hall Renovation at the Waterfront Towers, the Northeast Library project, and several million square feet of industrial development. To properly support the projected construction activity with plan review and inspection services, the forecasted rate of expenditure will require an additional $400,000 over the course of the next fiscal year (FY 2021-22).

Construction projections are based on permit activity trends and known projects. The estimates for the remainder of FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22 assume an increase in permit activity and corresponding increase in building valuations. Currently there are 108 permits that are approved pending payment, with a combined valuation of $54 million. There are an additional 923 permits in City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 5/4/2021
powered by Legistar™
Attachment A 646
File #: 21-0242, Version: 1
for review with a combined valuation of $126 million. Actual permit activity for the first eight (8) months of FY 2020-21 surpassed estimates.

Present Situation
Development activity has continued to increase, particularly in the residential and industrial sectors.

Although the department has added full-time staff to manage more predictable, long-term development needs, there is still a need for on-call services related to the more cyclical aspects of development. Projects requiring plan review have increased in both volume and complexity. The increase in activity directly leads to an increase in daily inspection stops. Contract services are necessary to supplement permanent full-time staff and to maintain service levels. Extension of the current contract through FY 2021-22 is the last extension allowed under the original contract. The department plans to initiate a request for proposals in the fall for new contract services beginning FY 2022-23.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Table 2 below outlines the expenditures for the contract. $294,474 has been expended so far in FY 2020-21. The remaining $364,885 for the fiscal year is sufficient. Based on the updated projections, there is a need for an additional $400,000 and a one (1) year contract extension (Attachment D - Proposed Amendment #3) to provide adequate service levels through FY 2021-22. As this will be the last allowable extension of the original contract, any excess funds not expended will be allocated back to the Department budget.

Table 2.

Total
Contract
Fiscal Year
2017-2018
Fiscal Year
2018-2019
Fiscal Year
2019-2020
Fiscal Year
2020-2021
Remaining
Balance
Total
Amounts
$1,700,000 $270,406 $398,885 $371,350 $294,474 $364,885 Pending approval of the FY 2021-22 Annual Budget, funds have been requested in the Development Services Fund, Community Development Department, Building and Life Safety division to sustain the $400,000 increase to the contract. There is no impact to the General Fund, or any other unrestricted fund, from this action.

Attachment A - Master Services Agreement 2017-06-20-1103 NP Attachment B - Master Services Agreement Amendment 1
Attachment C - Master Services Agreement Amendment 2
Attachment D - Proposed Master Services Agreement Amendment 3 City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 5/4/2021
powered by Legistar™
Attachment A 647
1303 J Street, Suite 270
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.492.2275 phone
916.492.2276 fax
www.csgengr.com

PROPOSAL TO THE
City of Stockton

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, AND INSPECTION SERVICES | PUR 22-001
March 24, 2022
Attachment B 648

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 1 Table of Contents
Required Forms 2
S E C T I O N 1 Cover Letter 6
S E C T I O N 2 References 9
S E C T I O N 3 Financial Statement 13
S E C T I O N 4 Corporate Structure & Organization 14
S E C T I O N 5 Approach & Project Schedule 30
S E C T I O N 6 Proposal Fee (Separate Submittal) 37
Attachment B 649
8-1
8 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS

ON CALL BUILDING SERVICES
PUR-22-001
SUBMITTAL DUE: THURSDAY, MARCH 24, 2022, AT 2:00 PM
RFP Submittal
Mailing, Delivery Address
and Electronic Mail
Office of the City Clerk
425 North El Dorado Street, First Floor
Stockton, CA, 95202-1997
[email protected] (if applicable)
Proponent Business Name
Proponent Contact Name
Proponent Address
Proponent Phone Number
Proponent Email Address
Department of Industrial
Relations ID Number (if
applicable)
CSG Consultants, Inc.

Cyrus Kianpour, PE, PLS
President
550 Pilgrim Drive
Foster City, 94404 650-522-2500 [email protected]
Attachment B 650
8-3
ATTACHMENT B- PROPONENT’S COVENANT
In submitting this proposal, as herein described, the Proponent agrees that:

1. They have carefully examined the Scope of Work and all other provisions of this document and understand the meaning, intent and requirements of same.

2. They will enter into contract negotiations and furnish the services specified.

3. They have signed and notarized the attached Non-Collusion Affidavit form, whether individual, corporate or partnership. Must be ‘A Jurat’ notarization.

4. They have reviewed all clarifications/questions/answers on the City’s website at www.stocktonca.gov/adminbid.

5. Confidentiality: Successful Proponent hereby acknowledges that information provided by the City is personal and confidential and shall not be used for any purpose other than the original intent outlined in the Request for Proposal. Breach of confidentiality shall be just cause for immediate termination of contract agreement.

FIRM

ADDRESS

SIGNED BY & DATE

TITLE OR AGENCY

PHONE/FAX NUMBER
EMAIL
CSG Consultants, Inc.
550 Pilgrim Drive, Foster City, CA 94404
President
650-522-2500 (phone) | 650-522-2599 (fax)
[email protected]
Attachment B 651
Attachment B 652
(Version 9.22.21) 1

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

ON CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN

REVIEW, AND INSPECTION SERVICES

FOR THE CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
(PUR 22-001)
ADDENDUM No. 1 DATE: 3/10/2022
To All Potential Proponents:

A. This Addendum shall be considered part of the proposal documents for the above-mentioned project as though it had been issued at the same time and shall be incorporated integrally therewith.

Where provisions of the following supplementary data differ from those of the original proposal documents, this Addendum shall govern and take precedence. PROPONENTS MUST SIGN THE ADDENDUM AND SUBMIT IT WITH THEIR PROPOSALS.

B. Proponents are hereby notified that they shall make any necessary adjustments in their estimates as a result of this Addendum. It will be construed that each Proponent’s Proposal is submitted with full knowledge of all modifications and supplemental data specified herein.

PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS/ANSWERS/CHANGES TO
(PUR 22-001). THE CITY’S RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS SUBMITTED

ARE IN BLUE
Questions & Answers

1. Would the City of Stockton be able to provide a potential contract value? Answer: Approximately $1.5 - $2 million over a 3-year term. The contract value is inclusive of all vendors if more than one is selected to provide services.

2. What is the City’s anticipated response time for inspections? e.g., next-day if requested by a certain time on the previous business day, 48 hours’ notice, etc.

Answer: Next day if requested by noon on the previous business day.

3. What is the current fee schedule used by the City to provide these services? Answer: 2020-21 Adopted Fee Schedule Please note that a new fee schedule will take effect on July 1, 2022, in-line with the commencement of this contract.

4. What is the anticipated volume of work for the tasks required by the solicitation? Answer: With current construction activity and anticipated projects we expect steady use of consultant services. We’re anticipating a need for at least two (2) full-time inspectors and steady plan check services on a monthly basis.

PROPONENT MUST ACKNOWLEDGE THIS ADDENDUM BY SIGNING BELOW AND ATTACHING THE SIGNED ADDENDUM TO THE PROPOSAL:

Company Name
CSG Consultants, Inc.

Attachment B 653
(Version 9.22.21) 2
Contact Person
Signature
Date
Proposals Due – Promptly by 2:00 P.M., Thursday, March 24, 2022, at the City Clerk’s Office.
----------------------------------City of Stockton Use Only below this line--------------------------------- Addendum acknowledged and signed? (Procurement Specialist’sinitials) Cyrus Kianpour, PE, PLS, President
3/22/2022
Attachment B 654

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 1303 J Street, Ste. #270, Sacramento, CA 95814
phone 916.492.2275 | fax 916.492.2276 | www.csgengr.com Cover Letter
March 24, 2022
Office of the City Clerk
City of Stockton
425 North El Dorado Street, First Floor
Stockton, CA 95202
Re: RFP for On-Call Building Code Plan Review, Structural Engineering Plan Review, and Inspections Services PUR 22-001
CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) would like to thank the City of Stockton (City) for the opportunity to present its proposal for on-call Building Code Plan Review, Structural Engineering Plan Review, and Inspection services. Our firm brings specialized expertise; knowledgeable, experienced and customer servicefocused building department staff, proven digital plan submittal and review services, and an existing successful working relationship the City through provision of building and fire life safety services and providing mentoring to the EIT program.

CSG can readily provide these requested services with the proposed personnel herein. All proposed staff are registered engineers and/or ICC certified, with additional qualifications including LEED, DSA, and CASp experience and certification. Many of our proposed staff members are cross-trained in multiple service levels, providing our clients with increased efficiency as well as the ability to provide on-call staffing depending upon the City’s fluctuating needs.

CSG currently furnishes building and safety, public works, planning, fire prevention, code enforcement and other municipal services to over 250 clients including many nearby communities. We perform work solely for public agencies, eliminating the potential for conflicts of interest. In this way, we can focus exclusively on the specific needs of our municipal clients. We have a solutions-oriented approach to our work, leveraging our team’s depth and breadth of experience and technical expertise to resolve issues for our clients.

Our local office is in Sacramento and we can easily be available for meetings at the City when requested.

Bob Latz will serve as primary contact for this contract and is available to respond to inquiries regarding our proposal. His contact information is as follows:

Bob Latz, CBO
Regional Manager
209.304.4603 direct
[email protected]
Please feel free to contact Mr. Latz with any questions or comments you may have regarding our proposal. CSG acknowledges receipt of Addendum #1 issued on March 10, 2022.We greatly look forward for the opportunity to continue to provide customer focused building department services to the City of Stockton
Sincerely,
Cyrus Kianpour, PE, PLS
President, CSG Consultants, Inc.

SEC TION 1
Attachment B 655

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 7 C O M P A N Y P R O F I L E
CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) is an employee-owned California company with its local office in Sacramento and headquarters in Foster City, CA. Additional support is available from our other offices in Fresno, Newman, Pleasanton, San Jose, , and Orange. Founded in 1991, CSG performs work solely for public agencies, eliminating the potential for conflicts of interest between developers and agencies. In this way, we can focus exclusively on the specific needs of our municipal clients.

NAME OF FIRM: CSG Consultants, Inc.

PRIMARY CONTACT Bob Latz, CBO
Regional Manager
(209) 304.4603 direct
[email protected]
LOCAL OFFICE: 1303 J Street, #270, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 492-2275 phone • (916) 492-2275 fax
HEADQUARTERS: 550 Pilgrim Drive, Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 522-2500 phone • (650) 522-2599 fax
www.csgengr.com • [email protected]
REGIONAL OFFICES: 5151 North Palm Avenue, Suite 530, Fresno, CA 93704 930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360
3875 Hopyard Road, Suite 141, Pleasanton, CA 94588
3150 Almaden Expressway, Suite 255, San Jose, CA 95118
3707 W. Garden Grove Boulevard, Suite 100, Orange, CA 92868 YEARS IN BUSINESS: 30 • Founded in 1991
OWNERSHIP: Employee-Owned
EMPLOYEES: 300+
TYPE OF BUSINESS: California Corporation • Incorporated June 15, 2000 • Federal ID: 91-2053749

S T A F F C O M P OS I T I O N
The majority of the 300+ individuals within our firm have provided public agency services throughout their entire careers. Our talented personnel, having held positions within communities facing similar development concerns as the City of Stockton, bring a wealth of ideas, experience, and solutions. Depending upon the needs of our clients, we can serve in either a project-specific or on-call staff augmentation capacity. CSG maintains the breadth and depth of experienced and licensed/certified staff necessary to support the City’s needs.

Our multi-disciplined municipal services staff consists of the following types of professionals:
 Building Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Planning Professionals  Fire Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Code Enforcement Officers  Structural Engineers  Grading Improvement Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Plan Review Engineers  Civil Engineers
 Fire Protection Engineers  Construction Managers
 Building Officials  Construction Inspectors
 CASp Professionals  Information Technology Professionals  Permit Technicians  Sustainability Professionals
Attachment B 656

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 8 C O M P R E H E N S I V E M U NI C I P AL S E R VI C E S CSG provides a wide range of services to community development and public works departments, often seamlessly serving as an extension of agency staff. We are customer-centric and organized into the lines of business outlined below, each managed by highly experienced industry experts. Many of CSG’s personnel serve more than one line of business, which improves the quality of customer service and results in high employee retention.

B UILDI NG & FI RE LIF E

S AF ET Y
Building Department Administration
Building Plan Review and Inspection
Fire Plan Review and Inspection
Structural Plan Review
OSHPD3 Review
CASp Assessment and Inspection
Public Facilities Assessment
LEED/Green Building Services
Code Compliance/Enforcement
Staff Augmentation

P LA NNI NG &

S UST AINA BILIT Y
Staff Augmentation for Current and Advance
Planning
Project Management Including Plan
Amendments
CEQA Environmental Review
Energy Efficiency, Water Conservation, Solid
Waste Program Development
AB 32 Compliance/Climate Action Plan
Development and Implementation
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies
Grant Writing and Grant Management

I NF ORMA TI ON

T EC HNOL OGY
GreenVue Permitting Software
Digital Plan Review
Electronic Archiving
Web-Based Construction Management Asset
Management
Project Management
GIS and IT Support

P UBLI C W OR KS

E NGI NE ERI NG & D ESI GN
Capital Improvement Project Design:

Transportation/Roadway, Water and
Sewer Utilities, Traffic Engineering
Development Review, Plan Check, Surveying
and Mapping, Storm Water Program
Compliance (NPDES, QSP/QSD)

C IP P R OJE CT & P R OGR AM

M A NA GEME NT
Capital Improvement Program Development
and Implementation
Federal and State Grant Administration
Rule 20A Undergrounding
Staff Augmentation Including: Design
Consultant Coordination, Project Scoping,
RFP Preparation

C ONST RUCT ION M A NA GEME NT
& I NS PE CTI ON
Contract Administration, including: Resident
Engineer Oversight, Inspection and
Construction Management
Constructability/Bidability Reviews
Cost and Schedule Control
Claims Avoidance

PROPOSED C ONT RACT C OMMENT S
CSG has reviewed the Sample Contract and would appreciate consideration of the following proposed revisions.

EXHIBIT C – GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS, Section 13. Indemnity and Hold Harmless:
 Line 4 – Insert “to the extent” before “acts”.
 Line 5 – Insert “negligent” before “acts”.

Attachment B 657

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 9 References
CSG currently provides services to more than 200 clients throughout California. Our track record of success with our clients is outstanding and we encourage you to contact our references with any questions or clarification you might require. The following is a partial list of regional references for which CSG has provided similar services as those requested by the City. Project budgets and additional information can be provided upon request from the City.

City of Manteca
Brad Wungluck
Chief Building Official
1215 W Center Street, Suite 201
Manteca, CA 95337
(209) 456-8562
[email protected]
Building & Fire Plan Review and Inspection, and
Permit Technician Services
2018 – Ongoing
City of Elk Grove
Shane Diller
Development Services Assistant Director
8401 Laguna Palms Way
Elk Grove, CA 95758
(916) 687-3002
[email protected]
Full Service Building Department Administration,
Plan Review and Inspection, and Permit Technician
Services
2021 – Ongoing
City of Citrus Heights
Greg Anderson
Chief Building Official
Citrus Heights, CA
(916) 727-4760
[email protected]
Building Plan Review and Inspection
2011 – Ongoing
City of Stockton
John Schweigerdt, CBO, CASp
Deputy CDD Director Building and Safety
Stockton, CA
(209) 937-8565
[email protected]
Building Plan Review and Inspection
2013 – Ongoing
City of Lincoln
Will Foote
Building Official
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
(916) 434-3241
[email protected]
Building & Fire Plan Review and Inspection, and
Permit Technician Services
2013 – Ongoing
City of Sacramento
Ezra Roati
Associate Architect
5730 24th Street, Building 4
Sacramento, CA 95822
(916) 808-5877
[email protected]
Inspector of Record - Fire Station #14
2019 – Ongoing
City of Patterson
Ken Irwin, City Manager
1 Plaza Circle
Patterson, CA 95363
(209) 895-8033
[email protected]
Building & Fire Plan Review and Inspection, Building
Official, Permit Technician Services, & CASp Services
2014 – Ongoing
County of San Joaquin
David Kwong, Community Development Director
1810 East Hazelton Avenue
Stockton, CA 95205
(209) 468-3163
[email protected]
Building & Fire Plan Review and Inspection
2012 – Ongoing
SEC TION 2
Attachment B 658

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 10 P R O J E C T EX A M P L E S
The following is a small sampling of projects for which CSG has performed services similar to those requested by the City.

STERLING MEADOWS | CITY OF ELK GROVE, CA
Building Plan Review & Inspection
CSG provided building plan review and inspection for the Sterling Meadows projects which consists of 200 acres
located on the north side of Kammerer Road approximately one-half mile west of Grant Line Road. The development
allows for 1,184 Single Family residence, including two park sites totaling 18.5 acres. This phased project is currently under construction.

TOWNEPLACE SUITES & HOTEL | CITY OF ELK GROVE, CA
Building Plan Review & Inspection
CSG provided building plan review and inspection for the four-story, 112 room, 63,560 square foot hotel. The project valuation was $8 million dollars.

GREAT WOLF LODGE | CITY OF MANTECA, CA
Building and Fire Inspection, RFI Review
CSG provides all on-site building and fire inspections for this complex comprising a 510,000-square foot, 6-story, 500 room hotel; a 45,000 square foot family
entertainment center; and a massive water park
consisting of multiple 6-story water slides that start in the interior of the building, extend to the exterior, and then return to the interior. CSG’s project manager provides on-site oversight as well as all RFI reviews for this 18-20 month project. Depending on the project’s needs, CSG provides 2-4 full-time building and fire inspectors whose services include providing daily and weekly inspection reports.

MULTIPLE MASTER SUBDIVISIONS | CITY OF LINCOLN, CA
Building Plan Review and Inspection
CSG provided building plan review and inspection on multiple residential developments in the City of Lincoln. These included the following projects:
• Twelve Bridges by Taylor Morrison, a 308-unit development • Revere by Richmond American, a 122-unit development
• Turkey Creek Estates by Elliott Homes, an 824-unit development • Piamonte for Woodside Homes
Attachment B 659

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 11 NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES | CLIENT AGENCIES THROUGHOUT CA Building Plan Review, Building Inspection, Engineering Review, Construction Inspection
From new construction to bathroom remodels, CSG has performed thousands of building and fire life safety plan reviews, engineering reviews, building inspections and construction inspections of single-family residences for our client agencies throughout California and Nevada.

PILOT FLYING J TRAVEL CENTER | CITY OF PATTERSON, CA
Building Plan Review, Building Inspection
CSG performed building plan review and inspection for this new 15,951SF Type VB (unprotected, fully sprinklered)
structure with Type IIB fueling island canopies. The project is valued at $1,400,000. The structure includes a convenience store, PJ Fresh Market, Wendy’s Restaurant, shower
facilities, 10 gas islands (2 RV) and 9 diesel lanes.

STONEGATE VILLAGE SELF HELP APARTMENTS | CITY OF PATTERSON, CA Building Plan Review, Building Inspection
CSG performed building plan review and inspection for this new 171,937 SF, $13,500,000 multifamily project. The project comprises 22 two-story 7,706 SF residential buildings of type VB construction, sprinklered. Within these buildings there are 138 total residential dwellings. The project also includes a one-story community building. Buildings are wood framed, slab on grad construction with fiber cement siding and asphalt shingle roofs.

HAMPTON INN | CITY OF PATTERSON, CA
Building Plan Review, Building Inspection
CSG performed building plan review and inspection for this new 48,471SF, 4 story hotel with a valuation of $7,500,000. The project is Type V-A construction, fully sprinklered and includes 86 guestrooms, business occupancies, lobby, breakfast area, meeting room, fitness room, and an outdoor pool and spa.

CITY OF KERMAN ANIMAL SHELTER | CITY OF KERMAN, CA
Building Inspection
CSG provided building inspection services on this new, 4,670 SF free-standing City animal shelter with a $1.2 million valuation. The project is type V-B construction with occupancy type B/U. CSG work involved facilitating a fast-paced construction schedule which demanded inspection scheduling flexibility and same day or next day inspections.

Attachment B 660

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 12 SoFi NFL Stadium & YouTube Theater | City of Inglewood, CA Building Plan Review
The Los Angeles (NFL) Stadium at Hollywood Park located in the City of Inglewood is 70,000 fixed seats and has the flexibility to accommodate up to 100,000 seats. CSG
performs review for on-site improvements including grading, drainage and roadways. CSG also performs general building plan review including architectural, accessibility/ADA review, energy plan review, and CALGreen review. Plan review tasks are performed according to the latest Federal, State, and local codes and regulations. In collaboration with the City of Inglewood, the program management team and the architect, CSG participated in meetings prior to plan submittal to address major code interpretation issues to provide for a seamless process during the review periods. CSG’s team approach with the stakeholders has provided and continues to facilitate timely turnaround.

Attachment B 661

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 13 Financial Statement
Due to the confidential nature of the information requested, CSG’s financial statement is provided in a sealed, separate envelope for the City’s review. CSG requests that this information remain confidential should the City decide to publish the proposal.

SEC TION 3
Attachment B 662

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 14 Corporate Structure& Organization

T E A M & O RG A N I Z AT I O N AL S T R U C T U R E
CSG proposes the following team organizational structure for this project. All services will be directed out of our Sacramento office with additional resources available, if necessary, from any of our CSG offices. All plan review and inspection team members proposed herein are currently employed by CSG Consultants.

Bob Latz, CBO will serve as the primary contact and project manager for this contract. Mr. Latz will ensure that adequate resources are applied, provide oversight and quality control at all levels and allocate appropriate staff and hours to complete all projects on time. Key personnel are indicated with an asterisk (*). Resumes for all proposed key personnel are provided on the following pages. Additional resumes can be provided upon request from the City.

SEC TION 4
Jeff Janes, CBO, CFM*
Building Services Manager

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
Michael Loomis, SE, CBO, CASp*
Senior Principal Structural Engineer
Phiroze Wadia, SE, LEED AP*
Principal Structural Engineer
Bounmy Soumountha, SE, CBO*
Senior Structural Engineer
Shweta Prakash, PE, CBO
Principal Plan Check Engineer
Farzam Tondnevis, PE
Associate Plan Check Engineer
Shiping Feng, SE*
Senior Structural Engineer
Darcey Messner, PE*
Sneior Plan Check Engineer
Rajesh Vangala, CBO, CASp
Principal Plans Examiner
Jim Reber, SE
Senior Structural Engineer
Scot Weisse, PE*
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Linh Tran, PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Helen Chiu, PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
David Nesbet, PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Christine Jansen, PE*
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Yvonne Christopher, CBO*
Principal Plans Examiner
Steven May*
Principal Plans Examiner
Rick McManis, CBO, MCP*
Senior Plans Examiner
Thomas Pallinger*
Senior Plans Examiner
Kit Wong
Principal Plans Examiner
Lily Hallett, CASp
Building Plans Examiner

BUILDING INSPECTION
James Anders*
Senior Building Inspector
Dianna Sherrin*
Senior Building Inspector
Mike Leach, CBO
Senior Building Inspector
Randy Conley
Senior Building Inspector
Chuck Smithhart
Senior Building Inspector
Tony Garner
Senior Building Inspector
Wes Clary
Building Inspector I
CASp SERVICES
Michael Loomis, SE, CBO, CASp
Senior Principal Structural Engineer
Rajesh Vangala, CBO, CASp
Principal Plans Examiner
Lily Hallett, CASp
Building Plans Examiner
Bob Latz, CBO*
Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager
Attachment B 663
15 Bob

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Official
Certified Building Inspector
Certified Electrical Inspector
Certified Mechanical Inspector
Certified Plumbing Inspector
Certified Combination Inspector
Certified Access/ Plans Examiner
CA Commercial Building Inspector
CA Residential Building Inspector
CA Commercial Electrical Inspector
CA Residential Electrical Inspector
CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
CA Commercial Combination Inspector
CA Residential Combination Inspector
| ICC 0869074
Safety Assessment Program
| SAPC 50369

EDUCATION
Certificate of Achievement
Building Technology
Butte College | Oroville, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
CALBO Board of Directors,
Past President
CALBO Training Institute
Chairman and Instructor
Sacramento Valley Association of
Building Officials, Past President
CALBO Hall of Fame Award
CALBO Educator of the Year Award
Building Official of the Year Award
California Fire Prevention Officers,
Western Pacific League of
Building Officials, Past President
International Code Council
Latz CBO
Regional Manager
Mr. Latz serves as Regional Manager for CSG Consultants. In this capacity, he provides governmental management support for building administration, building inspection, plan review, fire services, code enforcement, public works, and planning. Mr. Latz brings over 28 years of experience in the municipal field. In this capacity, Mr. Latz works with many of our jurisdictional clients to provide resources for staff augmentation, coordination of expedited plan review and special projects, and education and training.

Mr. Latz has experience serving in both the public and private sector. He has served as the Interim Deputy Director of Community Development in the City of Stockton and as the Building Official for the Cities of Citrus Heights, Folsom, and Oakdale where he was responsible for overseeing the entire building department for each. His responsibilities included managing the day-to-day operations of the building departments, including plan review, permit issuance, building inspection services and code enforcement. He was also instrumental in budget preparations for the departments, ensuring all local and state ordinances and codes were met, as well as managing personnel issues. In addition, Mr. Latz served as President of the Board of Directors for the California Building Officials Association and is the Chairman and a valued instructor for the CALBO Training Institute. Mr. Latz was recognized as the 2014 California Fire Chiefs Association Fire Prevention Officers Building Official of the Year.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Official Code Advisor | City of Thousand Oaks
Mr. Latz is currently serving the Community Development Department for the City of Thousand Oaks. In this capacity he is providing workflow analysis and recommendations for the building department organizational structure and processes for permit processing, building inspection, and plan review to create more efficient and customer service focused policies, and building codes technical advisor and planning for major projects.

Interim Deputy Director/ Building Official of Community Development Department| City of Stockton
Mr. Latz served as a contract Interim Deputy Director/ Building Official of Community Development for the City of Stockton. In this role, Mr. Latz was responsible for the daily permit center functions, plan review, and building inspection. He helped to facilitate large scale projects through the development process coordinating with Fire, Planning, and Engineering.

Government Services Administration | City of Roseville
As a CSG project manager for the agency’s Government Services Building project, Mr. Latz helped expedite the plan review and coordination with City departments for this major development involving the Federal government, developer, and the City of Roseville. His work included attending weekly meetings to provide solutions and alternative options to facilitate compliance for approval.

President | California Building Officials (CALBO)
Mr. Latz served as President of CALBO and is the current chair of the CALBO Training Institute.

He is responsible for course development, product creation, instructor recruitment and training, and serves as the liaison to the Board of Directors for the planning and execution of the Education Weeks and Annual Business Meeting. He also serves as an administrator for the Building Official Leadership Academy and valued instructor for classes such as Building Department Administration, Permit Technician, and Effective Communication.

Building Official | Cities of Citrus Heights, Folsom, Oakdale & Lincoln Mr. Latz served the communities of Citrus Heights and Folsom as the Chief Building Official and served as the Interim Building Official for the Cities of Oakdale and Lincoln. In these capacities, Mr. Latz was responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of the building departments, including plan review, permit issuance, building inspection services and code enforcement. He was also instrumental in budget preparations for the departments, ensuring all local and state ordinances and codes were met, as well as managing personnel issues.

Attachment B 664
16 Jeff

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Official
Certified Fire Marshal
Certified Building Plans Examiner
Certified Residential Building Inspector
Certified Building Code Specialist
Certified Building Inspector
Certified Commercial Building
Inspector
Spray Applied Fire Proofing Special
Inspector
| ICC 5012845
Firestopping CLA
Swimming Pools & Spas CLA

EDUCATION
Master of Science, Ecological Design
San Francisco Institute of Architecture
| San Francisco, CA
Bachelor of Science, Architecture
San Francisco Institute of Architecture
| San Francisco, CA
Associate in Science, Architecture
Fresno City College
| Fresno, CA
Special Studies Design Program
Harvard University
| Boston, MA

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Building Official of the Year, County
Building Officials Association, CA 2015
California Building Officials, Past
Executive Board Member & Past
President
County Building Officials Association of
CA, Past President
Yosemite and San Joaquin Chapter of
ICC
Janes CBO, CFM
Building Services Manager
Mr. Janes is a highly experienced ICC Certified Building Official with extensive building department administration and management experience. He is experienced in supervision and coordination of the activities, operations of jurisdictional building and safety divisions, including the University of California, Merced expansion project. In addition, Mr. Janes serves as the Regional Manager for the Fresno Office which includes the Central Valley to the Central Coast. Specific skills includes budget strategy, preparation and oversight, and implementation of best practices across multiple departments. Mr. Janes is knowledgeable in enforcing compliance and minimum standards to safeguard life, limb, health, property and public welfare.

Mr. Janes has also successfully guided department staff with inspection and plan review for all phases of complex construction projects. He is experienced utilizing building department permit tracking software and managing all common building department responsibilities, including plan review, multi-discipline inspections, plan review and inspection scheduling, field supervision, regulatory compliance, code interpretation, and project acceptance. Mr. Janes also makes a difference to our clients and those he works with through his skills in complaint resolution, problem solving, damage assessment and team building.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Official | Multiple CSG Clients
Mr. Janes currently serves as a Building Official for CSG clients.

Regional Manager/Building Official | Interwest Consulting Group Mr. Janes served as a Building Official for clients throughout California included UC Merced 2020 Project – a $1.4 billion-dollar major campus expansion project which includes site preparation and construction of multiple state of the art educational facilities.

County Building Official | County of Fresno, CA
Mr. Janes managed four units in the Development Services Division (plan check, inspection, zoning, and code enforcement). He streamlined the triage process for plan check submittals, created an e-blast network of design professionals for code updating and internal processing procedures. Mr. Janes also established a free public code training update class with other jurisdictions, coordinated joint bulletins with surrounding jurisdictions and improved initial code enforcement communication processes.

County Building Official | County of Madera, CA
Mr. Janes managed and applied the principles of supervision, organizational and operation of a modern building department to the County of Madera. He reviewed and examined construction documents for residential, commercial and industrial building construction and alterations; ensured plans, structural calculations and specifications complied with building and related codes and regulations. He recommended necessary changes for compliance with applicable codes and regulations while routing applicants to appropriate divisions, implemented staff training for building inspectors, standardized public information handouts and information as well as successfully worked with other agencies, departments, officials, employees, contractors and the general public.

Attachment B 665
17 Michael

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Engineer
State of California| 60787
Professional Structural Engineer
State of California| 4824
Professional Structural Engineer
State of Nevada | 27152
Certified Access Specialist (CASp) 099
Certified Building Official
Certified Accessibility Inspector
Plans Examiner
CA Building Plans Examiner
CA Commercial Building Inspector
CA Residential Building Inspector
CALGreen Plans Examiner
|ICC 8000164

EDUCATION
Master of Science, Civil Engineering
Santa Clara University | Santa Clara, CA
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
Santa Clara University | Santa Clara, CA

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Santa Clara University
Timber Design | Adjunct lecturer
Earthquake Engineering |
Adjunct lecturer
Strength of Materials |Adjunct lecturer
County of Amador | CASp presentation
to small business owners
ICC/Peninsula Chapter | Structural
Provisions of the 2010 California
Residential Code
Loomis SE, CBO, CASp
Senior Principal Structural Engineer
Mr. Loomis offers CSG’s clients expertise gained from over 24 years of professional experience in the building industry. Mr. Loomis’ demonstrated knowledge of California and International Building Codes are reflected in his roles as both an adjunct lecturer at Santa Clara University and as a structural plan check engineer for CSG. Mr. Loomis has experience in all forms of structural construction, including steel, concrete, masonry, heavy timber, and light-gauge steel materials. He has also served as a peer reviewer for OSHPD and DSA projects. Mr. Loomis serves in a supervisory role in CSG’s plan check division, managing and acting as a mentor to CSG’s growing team of engineers and technical staff on a wide variety of projects throughout California. He provides consultation to local jurisdictions regarding structural, accessibility and green building compliance and has worked in-house for jurisdictions providing plan review, building inspection, over the counter plan review and Building Official services. Mr. Loomis’ expertise includes review of complex commercial, industrial and residential structures for compliance with applicable building codes and ordinances, engineering standards and specifications, supplemental energy requirements, and accessibility regulations.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Linear Coherent Light Source II Expansion | SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory This project consisted of the underground expansion to an accelerator. Project included office space as well as special use experimental spaces and utilized mining design and construction techniques.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. | City of Foster City, CA
A five story H and B occupancy biotech building project included challenging occupancy separations as well as adverse soil conditions.

Santa Cruz Warriors Arena | City of Santa Cruz, CA
New 3,000 seat basketball arena with associated restrooms and concessions.

Palo Alto History Museum | City of Palo Alto, CA
This project involved the extensive remodel of historic building to house history museum and archive. Revised usage required careful study of exiting systems. This project utilized CBHC provisions for accessibility.

Ocean Street Commons | City of Santa Cruz, CA
This project consisted of 9 residential units over commercial space and was wood framed construction. Additional projects included multiple tenant improvement projects of varying sizes as well as multiple new and additions to single-family homes.

J U R I S D I C T I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E
Residential / Commercial Building Inspector
Towns/Cities of Atherton, Brisbane, Half Moon Bay, Los Altos Hills, Pacifica, Sausalito, Monte Sereno, and SLAC Linear Accelerator Laboratory
In-House Plan Review
Towns/Cities of Atherton, Santa Cruz, Salinas, San Jose, and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Over the Counter Plan Review
Towns/Cities of Atherton, Belmont, Pacifica, Santa Cruz, Sausalito, Woodside Building Official / Interim Building Official
Towns/Cities of Woodside (BO), Atherton (Interim BO), Pacifica (interim BO) CASp Inspection / Consultation
Cities of Santa Cruz, Half Moon Bay, Pacifica, Sausalito, Watsonville, Seaside, Brisbane, Colma, Soledad, San Mateo, San Leandro, San Anselmo, and the Stanford Linear Accelerator Attachment B 666
18 Phiroze

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Structural Engineer
State of California | 2020
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | 20042
Professional General Building Contractor
State of California | 5021918
LEED Accredited Professional

EDUCATION
M.S.C.E, Structures and Soil Mechanics
University of Illinois | Urbana, Il
M.B.A, Management
Golden Gate University |
San Francisco, CA

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
Structural Engineers Association
of California
Earthquake Engineering
Research Institute
Applied Technology Committee
International Code Council
Wadia SE, L EED AP
Principal Structural Engineer
Mr. Wadia is a plan review engineer for CSG. He has over 40 years of experience in plan review, design and construction of residential, commercial, industrial and civil engineering projects. Mr. Wadia has expertise in the delivery of a wide range of municipal services, including:
• Plan review
• Encroachment permit application review including grading, structural, drainage and erosion control permits
• Code enforcement
• Enhancing and developing new and existing City ordinances • Supervising renovation, rehabilitation and restoration of bridges • Inspecting buildings and structures for structural integrity and condition • Investigating structural failures and inspecting repairs

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Mr. Wadia’s range of expertise has evolved as a result of the successful completion of a variety of projects including:
• 24 commercial buildings
• 60 residential wood frame buildings
• 32 seismic inspections, evaluations &
retrofits
• 3 bridge and over-crossings projects
• 8 post-earthquake damage assessments
• 9 offshore, modular & Arctic projects
• 4 space & defense projects
• 3 war damaged re-construction
projects
• 8 petrochemical plants
• 10 nuclear/power plants
• 8 research projects
• 5 transportation projects
• 2 telecommunications projects
Plan Review Engineer | Consultant to City of Larkspur, City of Sausalito, Town of Ross, Town of San Anselmo, CA
As Consultant to the abovementioned agencies in Marin County, Mr. Wadia performed a variety of services including plan and encroachment permit application review, inspection, code enforcement, and enhancing and developing existing and new city ordinances.

Associate | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, San Francisco, CA As an Associate at a San Francisco architectural and engineering firm, Mr. Wadia worked closely with multidisciplinary teams on building designs from concept through construction.

He led structural engineering projects including high-rise office buildings, schools and colleges, hotels, sports stadiums, theaters, retirement communities, and shopping centers. Mr. Wadia also performed seismic inspections, evaluations, and retrofits of existing facilities.

Chief Engineer | Bechtel, San Francisco, CA
As Chief Engineer of Bechtel, Mr. Wadia was responsible for leading a group of over 200 technical personnel including architects, structural engineers, civil engineers and designers.

His work included establishing standards, reviewing technical quality, recruiting, and establishing training programs. His projects included bridges and industrial and mining facilities such refineries, oil fields, LNG plants, chemical waste treatment plants, offshore construction, modularized construction, arctic and extreme hot weather construction, space launch facilities, solar and geothermal power plants, and nuclear facilities.

Attachment B 667
19 Bounmy

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | 32213
Structural Engineer
State of California | 3062
Certified Building Official

EDUCATION
Master of Science
Structural Engineering
Washington University | St. Louis, MO
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
UC Berkeley| Berkeley, CA
A.S., Engineering
Santa Rosa Junior College
Santa Rosa, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Structural Engineers’ Association of
Northern California
California Building Officials
Soumountha SE, CBO
Senior Structural Engineer
Mr. Soumountha has over 38 years of experience in civil and structural engineering analysis, public works engineering and land development, project development review and approval, and building inspection plan review and permit services. He managed hundreds of projects in his 22 years of service at the City of Santa Clara including the 49ers Stadium, large development projects such as the Gallery at Central Park consisting of 500 plus single family and multifamily buildings and other projects worth more than 200 million dollars of all complexities in terms of fire and life safety and structural engineering systems.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Permit Service Manager | City of Santa Clara, CA
Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Soumountha worked as a Permit Service Manager and managed 3 inhouse and outside consultant Plan Check Engineers who were licensed civil and structural engineers, 3 Permit Technicians, and 1 Customers’ Representative. He supported and acted on behalf of the Building Official for all functions as assigned or in the Building Official’s absence.

Senior Plans Examiner | City of Santa Clara, CA
Mr. Soumountha served as Senior Plans Examiner where he verified, reviewed, inspected and approved construction of all commercial, industrial, and residential structures in the City of Santa Clara, with an annual construction volume valued at over $500 million. His other responsibilities included: comprehensive review of all structural and life-safety aspects of building construction; providing code interpretation to inspection staff, architects and contractors; responding to city council inquiries in matters of urban planning and zoning issues; and assisting in supervision of Building Inspection staff as assigned.

City Engineer I & II | City of Santa Clara, CA
As City Engineer II, Mr. Soumountha supervised the Title Section of the Land and Property Division of the Engineering Department. Some of his responsibilities included:
• Assisting in the formation of assessment districts and redistribution of surplus assessment district funds
• Reviewing and processing agreements for developments for City departments such as Silicon Valley Powers (the City Electric Department)
• Permitting encroachments into public easements and right-of-ways • Parcel and final maps inspection for the legal subdivision of private and public properties • Preparing the Engineering Department operating budget for 5 years Structural Engineering Designer and Code Consultant | Various Jurisdictions • Since 1980, prior to his service at the City of Santa Clara, Mr. Soumountha provided structural analysis and design, consultation on construction issues, and code consulting services for numerous projects outside of City of Santa Clara jurisdiction.

Attachment B 668
20 Shiping

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Structural Engineer
State of California| 4308
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California| 54113

EDUCATION
Ph.D., Structural Engineering
Tsinghua University | Beijing, China
Visiting Scientist – Department of Civil
Engineering
University of Michigan | Ann Arbor, MI
Feng SE
Senior Structural Engineer
Mr. Feng provides structural engineering services for CSG and brings over 35 years of engineering experience. He has served the past 18 years as the Senior structural engineer for the Division of State Architect for the State of California where her performed building plan review. Additionally, he served as an assistant professor and as a research engineer where he taught and studied the structural behavior of buildings during earthquakes. To this role he brings extensive knowledge and understanding of building design and structural systems.

R E L E V A N T J U R I S D I C T I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E Senior Structural Engineer | Division of the State Architect, State of California Mr. Feng provided plan review services for building projects submitted to the Division of State Architect (DSA). He reviewed structural drawings and specifications for K-12 public schools, community colleges, and essential services facilities to determine compliance with applicable building codes and regulations. He also reviewed and approved the seismic retrofit procedures of existing buildings.

Engineering Manager/Senior Engineer | American Buildings Company , Modesto, CA Mr. Feng designed complex steel building designs. He also over saw junior engineers’ projects.

Project Engineer | NCI Building Systems, Atwater, CA
Mr. Feng provided design services for metal buildings.

Design Engineer | K.I Engineering, Reno, NV
Mr. Feng provided design services for residential building projects.

Visiting Research Engineer – Department of Civil Engineering | University of Nevada, Reno, NV
Mr. Feng conducted analytical and experimental research of inelastic behavior of concrete buildings and bridge structures during an earthquake.

Assistant Professor – Department of Civil Engineering | Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Teaching of structural engineering, static and dynamic analysis, design of concrete and steel structures. And the research of the concrete structural behavior during the strong earthquake. Mr. Feng taught structural engineering, static and dynamic analysis, and the design of concrete and steel structures. He also conducted research on concrete structural behavior during earthquakes.

Attachment B 669
21 Darcey

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Building Plans Examiner
| ICC 5058093
Permaculture Design Certificate
| No. 11452
California Professional Civil Engineer
|License No. C59754
Nevada Professional Civil Engineer
| License No. 015599

EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering
University of Nevada, Reno | Reno, NV
B.S., Mechanical Engineering
Stanford University | Stanford, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Builders Without Borders: Member
California Straw Building Association
(CASBA): Member
International Code Council (ICC):

Member
Tahoe Truckee Engineers Association
(TTEA): Member, Structural
Committee, Former President
Truckee Talkers
ToastmastersCompetent
Communicator, Advanced
Communicator Bronze, Effective
Coaching 1 & 2
Sierra Green Building Association
(SiGBA): Former Member, Cofounder
Messner PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Ms. Messner is a Senior Plan Check Engineer with over 36 years of engineering experience.

Ms. Messner offers a wealth of California and Nevada Building Code knowledge to CSG’s clients. To this role, she brings leadership and management experience, and excellent organizational and time management skills.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Plans Examiner II | Town of Truckee, CA
Ms. Messner performed plan review for residential and commercial plans, specifications, and calculations submitted to the Building Division for structural and non-structural compliance with building codes, regulations, and ordinances. She provided information and assistance to engineers, architects, builders, and the public relating to the codes and regulations. Her responsibilities also included updating forms, checklists, informational handouts, municipal code sections and code petitions as well as training and mentoring Plans Examiner I. Ms.

Messner also participated in the Town’s Sustainability Committee and Energy Reach Code research.

Owner/Civil Engineer | EcoEngineering, Truckee, CA
Ms. Messner was the sole proprietor of a design and structural engineering practice which specialized in ecologically orientated residential design with an emphasis on straw bale and natural building, passive solar, and green building materials and methods. She provided service for new construction, additions, conversions, and remodels in seismically active, high snow load areas.

Cofounder/ Advisory Board/Technical Consultant | Pakistan Straw Bale and Appropriate Building (PAKSBAB)
Ms. Messner designed an affordable, climate-friendly, and locally appropriate straw bale building system to promote natural and sustainable building for marginalized families in Pakistan. Her responsibilities included organizational oversight, mentoring and training, strategic planning, design and engineering, grant and proposal writing, and presentations. She was also the principal investigator for PAKSBAB’s seismic research project.

Civil Engineer | Elise Fett & Associates, Ltd., Incline Village, NV Ms. Messner performed structural engineering calculations for residential new construction, additions, remodels, and minor commercial projects. She designed retaining walls, custom trusses, and connections and produced architectural and structural plans using AutoCAD. She also created site maps per County and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) coverage, BMP, and permitting requirements.

Project Engineer | Gary Davis Consulting Civil Engineers, Tahoe City, CA Ms. Messner produced structural engineering calculations for new residences and garages, additions, remodels, retaining walls, decks, covered walkways, re-roofing projects, and docks. She also inspected foundations and framing for engineering conformance. She performed as-builts to document structural layout and coverage, and to create site maps for the TRPA.

Designer/Builder | Messner-Howlett Construction, LLC, Truckee, CA Ms. Messner was a partner in a residential construction business. She was involved in all phases of construction for two custom houses in Tahoe Donner. She designed and drafted architectural and engineering plans. Ms. Messner was also responsible for agency processing, selecting and ordering materials, evaluating bids, and project scheduling.

Product Design/Development Engineer | Raychem Corporation, Menlo Park, CA Ms. Messner designed, prototyped, and developed telephone related products with an emphasis on environmentally sealed indoor and outdoor connectors.

Attachment B 670
22 Scot

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | 692221
Certified Commercial Plans Examiner
| ICC 8138165
Safety Assessor Coordinator
Cal OES | 81799

EDUCATION
B.S., Architectural Engineering
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo | San Luis Obispo, CA
Weisse PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Mr. Weisse is a Senior Plan Check Engineer with over 20 years of engineering and construction experience. His area of expertise includes structural engineering and plan check for complex commercial and residential projects from the beginning of development stage to the completion of construction. To this role, Mr. Weisse brings a wealth of California Building Code knowledge, and excellent project management and customer service skills.

During his time working for the City of Ventura, Mr. Weisse organized the building and safety staff during the Thomas Fire incident at the Emergency Operations Center which included organizing the initial windshield survey assessment for the 1,300 homes lost or damaged during the fire. He also assisted with coordinating the Thomas Fire Rebuild effort by performing public outreach and providing plan check services for the rebuild project.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Construction Permit Supervisor – Building and Safety Department | City of Ventura, CA Mr. Weisse was the supervisor for plan check staff and counter technicians. He provided plan check review for approximately 150 to 200 commercial and residential projects of varying complexity per year. He provided technical support and training to Building and Safety Department staff and other City departments and coordinated meetings with consultants, applicants, architects, engineers, and developers. He also served as the acting building official in the absence of the building official.

Mr. Weisse also served on the Development Advisory Committee (DAC) as the Building and Safety representative. He met weekly with representatives from each of the City’s departments and discussed proposed projects and recommendations for the developer to consider prior to their formal permit submittal.

Principal Civil Engineer / Owner | SWE Structural Design Services, Inc., Camarillo, CA Mr. Weisse owned a small structural engineering firm specializing in the design of residential structures, concrete tilt-up buildings, restaurants, and pre-manufactured steel building foundation systems. He developed structural plans and calculations using the four main building materials. Mr. Weisse also supervised multiple employees and managed contracts, accounting, taxes, insurances, and other state and city requirements.

Senior Engineer | Li & Associates, Thousand Oaks, CA
Mr. Weisse served as the lead engineer and project manager for multiple projects. He met with clients, architects, contractors, and building officials and performed construction administration. He also designed lateral and gravity systems, developed plans and details for construction. Mr. Weisse managed project budgets and time schedules and delegated work to draftsmen and other engineers.

Attachment B 671
23 Christine

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
California Professional Civil Engineer
|License No. 79594

EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering
California State University, Sacramento
| Sacramento, CA
B.S., Civil Engineering
California State University, Sacramento
| Sacramento, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers:

Member
SEAOCC: Member
Jansen PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Ms. Jansen is a Senior Plan Check Engineer with over 17 years of engineering experience. Ms.

Jansen offers a wealth of California and Nevada Building Code knowledge and project management experience to CSG’s clients. To this role, she brings leadership experience, and excellent communication, time management, and customer service skills.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Consultant Plan Review Engineer / Plan Review Coordinator Ms. Jansen reviewed building plans for compliance with the California building codes and City ordinances for both public and private commercial and residential structures for permit issuance. She also provided structural plan check for projects ranging from small nonhabitable structures to complex multi-story commercial buildings. Additional responsibilities included structural plan review coordination and management throughout California and Nevada.

Associate Civil Engineer | City of Sacramento, CA
Ms. Jansen provided building and structural plan check for public and private commercial and residential structures. She also served as an intern supervisor and her responsibilities included processing expedited requests and application extensions, providing over the counter structural plan review, and assisting applicants with code questions.

Civil Engineer | Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, CA
Ms. Jansen prepared and reviewed designs and specifications for projects relating to damns and waterway infrastructure in the Central Valley federal waterways. She was also responsible for completing budgets, construction schedules, and inspections for the dams and infrastructures.

Temporary Project Engineer – Single Project | Syblon Reid Engineering Contractor Ms. Jansen was responsible for general engineering, specification submittals, materials management, site management and oversight, sub-contractor organization, and payroll assistance for a 5-million-dollar project.

Assistant Engineer | Dokken Engineering, Inc., Folsom, CA Ms. Jansen was responsible for the design, analysis, detailing, specifying, research, calculations, plan check, and planning studies of moderate to complex highway infrastructure assignments.

Intern Engineer | David Evans and Associates, Inc.

Ms. Jansen’s responsibilities included roadway modeling, quantities, estimating, creating project reports, utility coordination, public infrastructure design, and the design and analysis of highways and highway interchanges.

Assistant Engineer | Wood Rogers, Inc.

Ms. Jansen’s tasks included project coordination, assisting with project and construction management, drafting, submittal processing, and cost estimations for subdivisions, major roadways, and parks.

Intern Engineer | Frayji Design Group
Ms. Jansen’s tasks included grading improvement plans, subdivision improvement plans, cost estimations, site design, project coordination and forward planning.

Attachment B 672
24 Yvonne

LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Official,
Certified Plans Examiner
Building Inspector – UBC
Plumbing Inspector-UPC
Electrical Inspector-NEC
Mechanical Inspector-UMC
Combination Inspector
Rehab/Conservation Inspector
Commercial Combo Inspector
|ICC 1026471

EDUCATION
AA, Building Inspection
Technology
Butte Community College
| Oroville, CA
AA, General Education
Cosumnes River College
| Sacramento, CA

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS

USGBC- LEED
National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA)
Sacramento Valley Association of
Building Officials
Christopher CBO
Building Official
Principal Plans Examiner
Ms. Christopher brings over 30 years of experience to CSG. Having served as Building Official, Inspector and Plans Examiner for multiple jurisdictions in California, Ms. Christopher offers a wealth of knowledge and expertise to CSG’s clients.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Chief Building Official | B r e n t w o o d , C A
Ms. Christopher managed the daily operations of the Building Division, including staffing, budgeting, and interdepartmental committees. She performed non-residential and residential plan reviews and field inspections on a regular basis. Ms. Christopher served as the flood plain administrator, managing all FEMA FIRM maps, LOMR and LOMC. In addition, she was manager of the housing division, including the management of 12 City owned rental units, two loan programs, and the affordable housing program for new developments. Ms. Christopher also managed all Code Enforcement staff and activities, which included the rental inspection program, business license enforcement, and SWPPPs.

Building Official / Director of Development Services | B u t t e C o u n t y , O r o v i l l e , C A As a Building Official, Ms. Christopher applied model code knowledge to plan review, inspections, and code enforcement. Her role included training staff in all aspects of building codes and administration.

Ms. Christopher provided code interpretation, assistance to the public and staff, and interfaced regularly with the Valley Builder’s Exchange, citizen’s groups and BIA. She implemented electronic permitting and fee justification through a nexus study, and created a permit center to address customer service needs. Ms. Christopher implemented the California state abandoned vehicle program through code enforcement. As Director, she oversaw the daily operation of the Building Department, Planning Department, and countywide Geographic Information System (GIS). In addition, Ms.

Christopher was responsible for setting the vision for the department through a new strategic plan, implementing a new coordinated approach to land use with the other land use departments, while handling a budget of $4.2 million and a staff of 46. She updated the housing elements of the General Plan with approval through HCD.

Chief Building Official / Assistant Director of Planning and Building / Permit Center Supervisor | C o u n t y o f M o n t e r e y , S a l i n a s , C A
As Chief Building Official, Ms. Christopher made technical decisions regarding federal, state, and local code interpretations. She interfaced regularly with 15 separate fire districts and implemented residential fire sprinkler installations based on ordinances. She directed the daily workload in 3 separate offices with a staff of 123. As Assistant Director, Ms. Christopher was responsible for daily operations of the Planning, Building and Administrative Divisions with a budget of over $11 million. As Permit Center Supervisor, she was responsible for creating the permit assistance team concept for the department and directly supervised building inspectors, plan check engineers, land use technicians, planners and clerical staff.

Plans Examiner | C i t y o f R o c k l i n , C A
Ms. Christopher reviewed and coordinated all plan reviews for commercial and residential projects. She provided plan check services for the building department and supervised the front building department counter. She attended meetings with architects, engineers, contractors and other city agencies and departments, and acted as building official in his absence.

Attachment B 673
25 Steven

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Plans Examiner,
| ICC 8103985
General Building Contractor
| 461559

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Economics
St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN
May
Principal Plans Examiner
Mr. May is a principal building plans reviewer for CSG with over 30 years of combined plan review and construction industry experience. He possesses an in-depth knowledge of California Energy Standards, principles of civil engineering with an emphasis in structural engineering, State of California accessibility standards, the California Green Building Code, and LEED.

For CSG, Mr. May provides building plan review for clients throughout the Sacramento Valley and San Francisco Bay Area, including but not limited to the Cities of Lincoln, Roseville, Modesto, Stanislaus County, Brentwood, Richmond, Pinole, Patterson, Escalon, Newman, Soledad, Los Banos, Truckee, Tracy, Anderson, San Carlos, and Counties of Placer, Sacramento, and Merced.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Twelve Bridges | City of Lincoln, CA
As a plan examiner, Mr. May performed reviews of commercial and residential plans for compliance with California Code.

Single Family Dwellings | Various Agencies
Mr. May has performed building plan review of new construction, additions, and remodeling of residential houses throughout the Sacramento and Central Valleys, and the high sierra region, including the Town of Truckee and County of Placer. Projects have involved Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) requirements.

Plans Examiner | County of Calaveras
As a plan examiner, Mr. May performed reviews of commercial and residential plans for compliance with California Code of Regulations Title 24 and for conformance with State and Federal Access Codes. Using his construction knowledge, he worked to solve design and structural issues and to develop safe, code-compliant solutions to design problems. In addition, Mr. May performed field inspections as necessary to investigate and resolve questions concerning code compliance and worked with customers to answer technical and procedural questions by phone and at the public counter.

Attachment B 674
26 Rick A.

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Master Code Professional
Certified Building Official
Certified Building Code Official
Certified Building Code Specialist
Certified Plumbing Code Official
Certified Plumbing Code Specialist
Certified Fire Code Official
Certified Fire Code Specialist
Accessibility Inspector
CA Building Inspector
CA Combination Inspector
CA Combination Commercial Inspector
CA Electrical Inspector
Fire Inspector I & II
CA Mechanical Inspector
CA Plumbing Inspector
Accessibility Plans Examiner
CA Building Plans Examiner
Fire Plans Examiner
Commercial Energy Plans Examiner
|ICC 5096043
PC 832 Laws of Attest – POST Control
#2540-80102-060006
CA Governor’s Office of Emergency
Services ATC 20 - #SAPC50541
CA General Builder – Class B #556031
ACIA Registered Construction Project
Inspector – RCI Division II #6085
ICC Professional Instructor and Subject
Matter Expert
McManis CBO, MCP
Senior Plans Examiner
Mr. McManis has over 40 years of combined construction industry and building codes professional and obtained an International Code Council Master Code Professional certification. He is knowledgeable and provides exceptional communication skills both verbal and written, personnel training experience, excellent project plans/documents/specifications interpretive skills, extensive computer software skills including the development of interactive digital constructability review processes.

Prior to joining CSG, Mr. McManis has served as Chief Building Official for the City of East Palo Alto, City of King City, and County of Mono; worked as a licensed General Builder in the states of California and Nevada; a multi-prime Construction Manager for California Division of the State Architect K through 12 school construction projects; and as a Sr. Project Manager for the $1.5B Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Expansion project in Palo Alto, CA. Additionally, Mr.

McManis has mentored and educated hundreds of Building Code Professionals through educational seminars and one-on-one training that include the CALBO Training Institute, Sacramento Valley Association of Building Officials, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, UC East Bay, and multiple bay area educational outreach events.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Master Code Professional / Senior Project Manager
Working as a collaborative partner with the Earth Design International and Per Plans Per Specs team, Mr. McManis’ responsibilities included Building Official administrative duties; planned, organized, and managed jurisdictional permitting, building inspection, plan checking [developed/implemented digital plan check policies and procedures that reduce turn-around time for permit issuance and revision reviews]; provided major input in the development, interpretation and revision of jurisdictional building ordinances; developed and recommended changes in fee schedules; served on special committees and task forces; oversaw the development and maintenance of building inspection records; and performed the most complex and sensitive building inspections.

Senior Project Manager | Cambridge CM, Inc.

Mr. McManis provided forensic analysis of defective construction installations prior to project closeouts, scheduled actualization analysis, contract enforcement, construction contractor billings analysis that included recommendations to withhold payments. He was specifically assigned to projects that are addressing delivery issues with focus on embedded interactive problem solving. These projects included Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Expansion project in the city of Palo Alto, $1.2B Apple AC2 campus $5+B, and to assist the Vantage V5 team address project safety issues.

Senior Building Plans Examiner | County of Monterey
As the Senior Building Plans Examiner, Mr. McManis developed professional methods to accelerate plan check review, trained new building plans examiners, developed a Correction Letter format/template, designed and produced Building Division over-the-counterguides/handouts, developed front counter technician checklists and templates for computer printed attachments allowing accelerated plan check approval on small projects and revisions.

He consulted with architects and engineers to arrive at cost effective and time saving building code solutions for their submitted projects. As Sr. Plans Examiner, he was utilized as a readily available resource to Building Inspectors assisting in the most difficult Code compliant construction coordination reviews, unusual installations, and resolution of interpretive cases and conducted field inspections and investigations for Code Enforcement cases ensuring accurate AS-BUILT Plans at permit issuance.

Attachment B 675
27 Thomas

LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
Certified California Residential Building
Plans Examiner
Certified California Residential Building
Inspector
Certified California Residential
Plumbing Inspector
Certified California Residential
Mechanical Inspector
Certified California Residential
Electrical Inspector
ICC 8275248
Safety Assessment Program, SAPC |
78530
Contractor’s General B License and
Electrical Classification | 652060
(inactive as of 8/1/16)
Pallinger
Senior Plans Examiner
Mr. Pallinger has over 35 years of experience in the construction field with extensive work experience as a general contractor and building inspector. He brings to the position not only extensive knowledge of the California building codes, applications and practices, but also the expertise gained from hands on construction experience in multiple trade disciplines. He exhibits excellent communication skills in performance of both plan review and inspection work and is adept at working with design professionals to address complex building regulations and code requirements.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Inspector | CSG Client Agencies
Mr. Pallinger provides both residential and commercial building inspection services for CSG client agencies, and is currently serving the City of Manteca.

Building Inspector II/III | City of Fairfield, CA
Mr. Pallinger conducted both residential and commercial building inspections for the City of Fairfield.

Building Inspector II / Plans Examiner | Placer County, CA Mr. Pallinger conducted residential and commercial building inspections as well as plan checks on residential, commercial and multi-family dwellings. In addition, he reviewed fire sprinkler systems and hydraulic calculations for code compliance, conducted safety assessment evaluations on dilapidated and disaster damaged structures through the California Office of Emergency Services, holds in-depth knowledge of the California Energy Code including residential and non-residential compliance manuals, and is knowledgeable of the Tahoe Regional Planning Association rules and regulations and Placer county MOU’s for the Lake Tahoe region.

General and Electrical Contractor | Castlewood Construction, Auburn, CA Mr. Pallinger estimated, scheduled, monitored and inspected all work from conceptual design through project completion, ensured that all work met state and local building code requirements, supervised and managed all construction trades to ensure conformance with plan specifications, and reviewed all architectural drawings and obtained/scheduled all required building permits and inspections.

Superintendent | Alpine Construction, Napa, CA
Mr. Pallinger oversaw all aspects of daily construction activities from employees and subcontractors. He directed all aspects of the building process on both residential and commercial renovation projects including site preparation, foundations, erecting framework, cut and stack roofs and truss systems, finishing carpentry, plumbing, electrical, mechanical and drywall.

Attachment B 676
28 James

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Inspector
Certified Plumbing Inspector
Certified Mechanical Inspector
Certified Electrical Inspector
Certified Combination Inspector
| ICC 878920

EDUCATION
Certificate of Completion
Butte Community College
| Oroville, CA
Anders
Senior Building Inspector
Mr. Anders brings over 22 years of experience as a Building Inspector to CSG and its clients. He combines his expertise with outstanding customer service to provide the highest quality building inspection services for his clients. Prior to joining CSG, Mr.

Anders served as the Building Inspector for the Cities of Davis and Pleasanton, County of Stanislaus, and most recently served as the Building Inspector for the City of Oakland. For CSG, Mr. Anders has served as an inspector for the Cities of Lincoln, Pacifica, and Salinas, as well as the County of Sacramento.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Inspector | Multiple CSG Client Agencies
As a CSG Building Inspector Mr. Anders has served the following agencies:
 City of Lincoln, CA
 City of Albany, CA
 City of Pacifica, CA
 City of Salinas, CA
 County of Sacramento, CA
 City of Pinole, CA
Building Inspector | City of Oakland, CA
Mr. Anders inspected residential buildings during and after construction. He observed conditions and issued notices for corrections to persons responsible for conformance. He also obtained evidence and prepared reports concerning code compliance violations and conducted surveys of existing building to determine lack of prescribed maintenance, housing violations, and hazardous conditions.

Consultant Building Inspector | Pleasanton, CA
Mr. Anders inspected new and existing buildings and structures. He also inspected residential buildings during and after construction.

Belmont Village Senior Living | City of Albany, CA
Belmont Village Senior Living is a four-story, 175-unit structure designed for senior residents that provides easy access for its residents to the greater mixed-use development of Belmont Village. This Type I building featured several columns spanning multiple floors held together by two post-tensioned concrete slabs, which offered Mr. Anders a unique inspection assignment.

Building Inspector | City of Oakland, CA
As a Building Inspector, Mr. Anders’ tasks included inspecting residential buildings during and after construction; observing conditions and issuing notices for corrections to persons responsible for conformance; obtaining evidence and preparing reports concerning code compliance violations which had not been corrected; and conducting surveys of existing buildings to determine lack of prescribed maintenance, housing violations and hazardous conditions.

Contract Building Inspector | Multiple Public Agencies
As a contract building inspector, Mr. Anders inspected new and existing residential and commercial buildings and structures for the following agencies:
 City of Davis, CA
 City of Pleasanton, CA
 County of Stanislaus, CA
Attachment B 677
29 Diana

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Inspector
Certified Commercial Electrical
Inspector | ICC 5278342
Certified Plumbing Inspector
| IAPMO N99278
Certified Mechanical Inspector
| IAPMO N91321
Sherrin
Senior Building Inspector
Ms. Sherrin brings over 28 years of experience in the construction industry, primarily as a building inspector. In addition to knowledge gained over the course of her extensive inspection career, Ms. Sherrin has been committed to ongoing professional development related to inspection practices and code requirements.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
CSG Senior Building Inspector | Multiple Clients
Ms. Sherrin has served as a building inspector of all types of construction for CSG client agencies, City of Brentwood and the County of Napa
Combination Building Inspector | City of San Jose, CA
For approximately 5 years, Ms. Sherrin performed field inspections in multiple trades on residential, commercial and multi-family projects including wood frame on concrete podium projects, single family tracts with post tensioned slabs, custom homes and light commercial tenant improvements.

Construction Inspector/IOR | San Jose State University, San Jose, CA For the San Jose State University, Facilities Development and Operations, Utilities Maintenance & Operations Division, Ms. Sherrin performed inspections in multiple trades. Her projects included a $6.2M central plant expansion, providing electricity and central steam for a 56 building campus; the $2M McQuarrie Hall fire pump and emergency generator/fire pump room with standby diesel generator and underground utilities for emergency power distribution; and $8M Campus Village plumbing repairs on high-rise dormitories to repair construction defects and upgrade domestic plumbing system including new Pro-Press piping, pumps and balancing valves for 250 dormitory units.

Building Inspector I | City of Gilroy, CA
Ms. Sherrin performed field inspections in multiple trades on residential, commercial and multi-family projects.

State of California Certified Access Specialist – Independent Contractor | Various Projects Ms. Sherrin performed initial and post-construction site surveys to determine compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Guidelines (ADAAG) and provided consultant services for accessibility upgrades and compliance.

Senior Permit Specialist | City of San Jose, CA
Ms. Sherrin coordinated intake, plan check and clearances, issued building permits, assigned new addresses, and maintained the City-wide property database.

Estimator | Sierra Precast, Inc., Livermore, CA
For this pre-cast concrete panel and column manufacturer and installer, Ms. Sherrin performed field estimates for new projects and repairs, contract administration and review, and created and maintained plant production Excel spreadsheets, take offs and cost estimates.

Attachment B 678

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 30 Approach& Project Schedule

A P P R O A C H T O W O R K
CSG’s proposed team has been selected to best support the specific needs of the City and will deliver the highest level of service through its application of technical expertise, knowledge of the City’s processes and procedures, efficient and effective customer care, and application of code compliance combined with innovative and helpful alternatives. Our extensive experience in furnishing comprehensive building and fire life safety services to the City provides a consistent, strong technical foundation to all projects. From providing leading-edge digital plan review and online plan check status reporting to delivering faster-thanscheduled turnaround times and code interpretations, CSG will deliver the highest quality services to the City of Stockton. CSG’s approach to work includes the following methodologies and key benefits:
 A wealth of fully committed and qualified personnel. We maintain staff that is fully licensed and certified at the highest level of industry standards. To keep our personnel on the industry’s leading edge, many serve as instructors and lecturers and sit on boards and committees for organizations developing and implementing important code regulations. We also keep current with the latest in procedures and use of products.
 Customized, responsive services. We are skilled at assessing time commitments, developing accurate work plans and applying dedicated, professional personnel with the skills and experience best-suited for the project. We can quickly fine-tune staffing levels to match or adjust to changes in plan review and inspection, to ensure responsiveness to customers. With our digital plan review capabilities, we are able to utilize plan review resources from any of our regional offices. In addition, we excel at coordinating with all agency departments as well as outside agencies.  Rapid turnarounds and expedited services. With extensive experience in both code application and the digital plan review process, our staff excels at performing expeditious turnarounds while delivering thorough and accurate reviews. We easily match and more often beat any required review turnaround deadlines.
 Leading-edge, cost-saving technology and methods. CSG delivers a suite of digital options— speedy digital plan reviews and electronic versions of plan comments; an easy-to-use online application for plan submittal, tracking and approval of digital plans; and available full scanning and archiving services. In addition, through knowledge gained from service to over 200 public agencies, we are constantly improving and adapting to provide our clients with the most cost-effective services.  Environmentally friendly practices. Our corporate policy on sustainability supports a healthy environment, reduces our carbon footprint and promotes environmental stewardship through environmentally preferable purchasing and other actions including use of a digital plan review system that bypasses paper consumption, and use of duplexing and recycled, post-consumer content paper when printing is necessary.

SEC TION 5
Attachment B 679

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 31 B U I L DI N G P L A N R E V I E W S ER V I C E S
Our team of professionals is ready to assist in all aspects of plan review and to focus on the special needs and requirements of each of our clients. We pledge thorough and accurate reviews and prompt turnaround times and offer proven digital plan review services and comprehensive online status reports. CSG serves as an active partner, working as a seamless extension of our public agency clients in performing the requested services and working closely with the development community and public as directed.

Compliance Standards
Our engineers and plan reviewers carefully review all plans and documents for compliance with building codes, fire codes, energy conservation standards, and accessibility regulations adopted by the State of California, and all local policies and ordinances including but not limited to:
 California Building Code, Volumes 1 and 2
 California Residential Code
 California Electrical Code
 California Plumbing Code
 California Mechanical Code
 California Fire Code
 California Energy Code
 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
 California Existing Building Code
 California Health and Safety Code
 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards as adopted and referenced by the State of California (California Code of Regulations, Title-19)
 State Historical Building Code
 NPDES/WQMP/SWPPP Compliance
 Local adopted ordinances and amendments relative to building, fire and municipal codes, including project Conditions of Approval from other agency departments, divisions, and regulating agencies Digital Plan Review
CSG has been providing digital plan
review services for over 20 years,
leading the consultant field with this
ground-breaking service. All paper plans
submitted to CSG for building and fire
plan review are immediately scanned
into digital files and stored on CSG’s
servers for quick and easy access by
both our clients and our plan reviewers.

Our plan reviewers furnish electronic versions of their plan comments conforming to each client’s established correction list templates. Any additional forms utilized by the agency will be incorporated into the correction comments and returned with the appropriate recommendations. Plan check comments can be delivered electronically by email or other agency-approved means, enabling staff to immediately modify CSG’s checklist for incorporation with other department comments. We provide convenient, environmentally friendly digital storage of all construction-related documents, and on request, can provide clients with a set of digitally scanned plans at no additional cost.

Leading the field in
digital plan review
services for over 20
years.

CSG has used
Bluebeam Revu
extensively as an
integral part of our
digital plan review
workflow used with
many of our clients.

Attachment B 680

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 32 In addition, for jurisdictions requesting a pure digital plan review workflow, we can enable an applicant to submit digital files—with no size limitations—directly to CSG via our web-based application. Our application includes an online portal for the applicant/jurisdiction to retrieve comments and marked-up digital plans including redlines. Importantly, this service tracks the status of all submittals and re-submittals until the plans have been approved.

Key features of our digital plan review service include:
 Efficient. Plans are pushed to plan review staff the same day they are received.
 User-friendly. CSG developed its own online portal specifically to manage the electronic file submittal process. Through use of this interface, the applicant is no longer faced with size restrictions on email attachments or required to learn complex file transfer settings.  Proven. We have provided a digital plan review option to our clients for over 20 years.
 Non-Proprietary. CSG’s electronic review process is 100% PDF-based with no additional software required to view redlines.

Online Plan Check Status
CSG offers a convenient service allowing clients to check plan review status and comments online. By accessing our secure Plan Check Status website, agency staff as well as authorized applicants can view their project documents and plans and communicate with the specific plan checker via e-mail. Staff and authorized applicants can download comments upon completion of the plan check. There is no additional cost for this service.

Plans Pickup and Delivery
CSG will coordinate pickup and delivery of plans and other materials from/to the agency via CSG personnel or an approved alternative service upon request from the City.

Green Building and LEED Accreditation
Our Building Division team is experienced in plan review and inspection for compliance with CALGreen and local green building ordinances and includes LEED Accredited Professionals. In addition, CSG Consultants has the qualifications necessary to assist with both the development of policy and the implementation of green and sustainable building practices. CSG’s Sustainability Programs division can assist, for example, with construction and demolition debris recycling programs and public outreach to the building industry.

OSHPD 3 Reviews
Our professional engineers and certified plans examiners are well-versed in the differences between CBC and OSHPD 3 facilities and have successfully completed OSHPD 3 plan reviews for multiple client agencies.

All paper plans
submitted to CSG
are immediately
scanned into digital
files for quick and
easy access by our
clients and plan
reviewers.

Attachment B 681

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 33 PL AN C HEC K T URNAROU ND TI MES
CSG strives to provide the highest quality and most timely service in the industry. We take pride in maintaining the requested plan review times for all our clients—even delivering faster than our own deadlines. Our goal is to approve code-complying projects and to move work quickly and successfully through jurisdictional processes. CSG will ensure that all building and safety duties and follow-up actions will be performed in a timely and responsive manner.

The following are CSG’s proposed plan check turnaround times:

TYPE OF REVIEW INITIAL REVIEW
(BUSINESS DAYS)2

RE-CHECK
(BUSINESS DAYS)2
Residential New Construction 10 5
Residential Additions 10 5
Small Residential Remodels 10 5
Commercial New Construction & Large/Complex Projects1 10 5 Commercial Additions 10 5
Small Commercial Remodels/Tenant Improvements 10 5
Expedited 5 5
1Turnaround time may vary with the complexity and magnitude of the project. If a review is anticipated to take longer than the maximum turnaround time, CSG will notify the City’s representative and negotiate additional time required to ensure an appropriate level of review. 2 The number of working days associated with the plan check turnaround time is based on time of project submittal. The first working day will be the day the project is received by CSG if submitted by 12:00 PM. For a project that is received by CSG after 12:00 PM, the first working day will be the next business day.

Expedited Plan Check Services
At the City’s request, we can perform plan check services on an accelerated schedule based on the fees indicated in our fee schedule.

B U I L DI N G I NS P E C T I O N S E RV I C E S
CSG provides fully integrated, multidisciplined building inspection services for residential, commercial, and
industrial projects. Our inspection
personnel have an outstanding
mixture of technical expertise and
experience in all construction types.

We provide experienced, ICC certified
inspectors who work with a team
approach to ensure compliance with applicable codes and requirements and provide solutions to mitigate potential risks and safety hazards. Using well-honed customer service and communication skills our inspectors excel at educating stakeholders to keep projects moving forward. Our inspectors also utilize current technologies and equipment to view plans and documents, research related code requirements, document field conditions and progress, and share that information with stakeholders while in the field.

Key services include but are not limited to the following:

CSG offers virtual
inspections utilizing
Google Duo,
FaceTime, Skype, MS
Teams or other
agency-preferred
platform.

Attachment B 682

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 34  Providing inspection services to ensure project compliance with State adopted codes and local amendments including building, electrical, mechanical and plumbing codes
 Offering code interpretation and education
 Seamlessly integrating into client organizations and consistently enforcing policies and procedures
 Addressing and resolving inquiries
 Maintaining records and files
 Providing all vehicles, fuel, maintenance and other equipment necessary for inspectors to carry out duties.

C E R T I FI E D A C C E S S S P E C I A L I S T P R OG R A M S E R V I C E S CASp Plan Review Services
We understand California Building Departments are required to have CASp certified staff in place and available for technical questions and interpretations. Our CASp certified team members are knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possess the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. In accordance with current regulations, CSG can provide CASp certified professionals to review plans for accessibility and to facilitate compliance with regulations.

CASp Consultation Services
To facilitate the City’s compliance with current rules and regulations, CSG will provide a CASp certified professional for technical questions and interpretations and to perform accessibility compliance inspections upon request.

CSG provides all
vehicles, fuel,
maintenance, and
other equipment
necessary for
inspectors to carry
out duties, with no
additional charges.

Attachment B 683

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 35 AVAIL ABILIT Y AND C UST OMER SERVI CE
We clearly understand the importance of our role in the success of the City and commit to providing project stakeholders and City staff with the highest level of service while functioning as a seamless extension of the City. We believe effective communication, responsiveness and an intense focus on customer service are essential to developing and continuing a successful working relationship between City staff, project stakeholders and CSG’s team members.

Office Hours and Meeting Availability
Plan Review
CSG plan checkers are available for inquiries anytime during normal business hours via phone or email, Monday through Friday. Our plan checkers can typically respond to the City for all questions or requests generated during any plan review on the same day, but no later than the following day a request is received.

To assist the City, we can also meet in-person with City staff and project stakeholders or can utilize video conferencing with all parties involved. We recognize the value of pre-design consultation with prospective applicants and are available to provide this service as well. Our designated Project Manager and/or technical staff will be available in-person for consultation and meetings with a reasonable lead time.

Inspection
CSG inspectors can be ready to provide services upon request to CSG’s designated project manager. We are flexible and can alter our hours to meet the City’s needs. Evening and weekend inspections for special construction needs can be accommodated with sufficient notice. CSG staff can typically respond to the City for all questions or requests generated during field inspections on the same day, but no later than the following day a request is received.

We recognize the
value of pre-design
consultation and are
available to provide
this important
service.

Attachment B 684

CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 36 C OMMIT MENT TO EXC ELL ENC E
Our People
Our clients benefit from the expertise of our team members who hold a wide variety of project experiences and are motivated to achieve the highest level of technical proficiency and certification. Knowing technical excellence is vital to successful service to our clients and to meeting their jurisdictions’ level of safety and code compliance, our team members are ICC certified, include registered engineers, and possess additional required professional certifications. They routinely update their knowledge and skills through attendance of specialized training classes and continuing certification seminars in the most current building codes and standards as well as approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety practices used in the industry. In addition, we understand that integrity, responsive customer service, and excellent communication and interpersonal skills are critical to on-the-job success, and we actively seek these qualities in our team members.

We also support our team members in their participation in and contributions to the many important associations and organizations within our industry. Many of our team members hold or have held key positions within the organizations listed below and have served as in-demand instructors and trainers.

League of California Cities
International Code Council
California Building Officials
County Building Officials Association of California
ICC Chapters of Napa-Solano, Peninsula, East Bay,
Monterey, Sacramento Valley, Yosemite, Shasta
Cascade, Central Coast, Redwood Empire, Los
Angeles Basin, Orange Empire, Foothill, Coachella
Certified Access Specialist Institute (CASI)
California Fire Chiefs Association
Northern California Fire Prevention Officers
Southern California Fire Prevention Officers
National Fire Protection Association
California Automatic Fire Alarm Association
American Fire Sprinkler Association
National Fire Sprinkler Association
American Public Works Association
American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE)
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Structural Engineers Association of Southern California Quality Assurance
Key to our approach to quality assurance is that it must occur throughout the entirety of the project and with the right people involved every step of the way. Our team’s unwavering integrity and commitment are combined with our internal processes and leading-edge digital technology to consistently produce quality work products and maintain highly satisfied clients. At project outset, CSG’s project manager assigns the most technically specialized team members who, through their experience and training, best understand the needs of our client. Our quality control processes include verifying procedures and code requirements, defining and applying standards used in code applications, and assessing work products to ensure that jurisdictional requirements and expectations are met.

Attachment B 685

CSG PROPOSAL CSG PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

ON-CALL BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, & INSPECTION SERVICES 37 Proposal Fee
CSG’s proposal fee for the requested services is provided in a sealed, separate envelope for the City’s review.

SEC TION 6
Attachment B 686
Attachment B 687

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Required Forms - Section 8
Proposal Form
Proponents Covenant Form
Non-Collusion Affidavit
Acknowledgement of Addendum

4.2 Cover Letter / Executive Summary........................................................................... 1 Minimum Requirements (4.1) ...................................................................................... 1 Key Staff........................................................................................................................ 1 Contact Information..................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Qualifications .......................................................................................... 1 Project Understanding................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgement of Addendum(s)............................................................................ 2

4.3 References ................................................................................................................... 3

4.4 Financial Statement................................................................................................... 7

4.5 Corporate Structure, Organization .......................................................................... 8 Firm Information.......................................................................................................... 8 Team Organizational Chart.......................................................................................... 9 Key Personnel.............................................................................................................10 Licenses & Certifications............................................................................................14 Project Experience .....................................................................................................18

4.6 Approach and Project Schedule..............................................................................25

4.7 Proposal Fee............................................................................. Submitted Separately Appendix
Key Staff Resumes
Attachment B 688

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Attachment B 689

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Attachment B 690

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Attachment B 691

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Attachment B 692

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Attachment B 693

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Attachment B 694

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Attachment B 695

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
SECTION 4.2

COVER LETTER
March 24, 2021
City of Stockton
Office of the City Clerk
First Floor, City Hall
425 North El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202-1997
RE: Proposal to Provide On-Call Building Code Plan Review, Structural Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Services | RFP No. PUR-22-001
Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal which provides a detailed overview of the building department services provided by BPR Consulting Group (BPR). We appreciate your time reviewing our proposal and look forward to the opportunity to provide On-Call Building Code Plan Review, Structural Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Services to the City of Stockton. We understand that the City is looking to partner with professional firms with experience in providing these services as well as a team that includes structural engineers and Certified Access Specialists. We believe BPR is well equipped to provide the City with the services you are seeking in a professional and customer-focused manner.

The attached proposal is organized as requested in the RFP and details the qualifications, experience, knowledge and our overall ability to meet the performance desires of the City, while minimizing cost. You will find that our proposal meets the minimum submittal requirements as outlined to include:
• Demonstration that BPR possesses the resources to be responsive to the City’s requests and has the ability to deliver timely services provided by exceptionally qualified staff. • We have provided a detailed Scope of Work specific to the City’s requested needs. • We propose a team of appropriately licensed, certified and experienced individuals who can efficiently and effectively deliver the services required to maintain the City’s expected level of service. • Our proposal has been signed by an individual authorized to bind the firm and all required forms have been included.

Key Team Members & Contact Information:

For the City of Stockton, we have identified the following key staff members who will oversee and manage the delivery of all services to the City of Stockton.

Ron Beehler, SE, CBO Bill Rodgers, SE Roger Peterson, SE Principal-in-Charge Principal/Project Manager Principal/Plan Review Manager 2201 Francisco Dr., #140-658 2201 Francisco Dr, #140-658 2201 Francisco Dr, #140-658 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 916.204.3178 916.662.0665 916.202.2902
Summary of Qualifications:

Our talented staff of Plans Examiners, Building Inspectors, Licensed Engineers, CASp experts and Permit Technicians have extensive experience providing all aspects of building department services. BPR’s staff provides services similar Page #1 Attachment B 696

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
to those being requested to numerous public agencies throughout the State of California including the Cities of Rancho Cordova, West Sacramento, Roseville, Placerville, South Lake Tahoe, Tulare, Yountville, Arroyo Grande, Clearlake, Chico, Rio Dell, Gardena, and the Counties of Napa and Madera, to name a few.

BPR’s staff of experienced building safety personnel provide high quality, thorough plan review and inspection services for our clients and their permit applicants. Our qualified professionals and expertise allow us to assist you and your department to maintain service levels during periods of increased workload and staffing fluctuations.

Unlike the large national firms providing a menagerie of services, BPR’s services are exclusively focused on supporting California communities in the delivery of high-quality, building department services, tailored to your community’s specific needs, with the goal of exceeding our clients’ expectations by:
 Providing all services in a cost-effective manner.
 Providing qualified and experienced Building Department personnel who have the ability to effectively communicate and explain relevant code requirements to designers, contractors, owner builders, and homeowners.
 Providing a high level of customer service for internal and external customers.  Balancing the need to ensure conformance to standards and regulations with the need for predictability, uniformity, and efficiency.
 Providing services in a timely manner.

BPR’s staff of Plans Examiners, Engineers, Building Inspectors and CASp experts are all appropriately licensed in the State of California or ICC Certified and are experienced and well-versed in providing the requested services in support of California Building Departments. Our plans examination staff is comprised of multiple California licensed structural engineers, licensed fire protection engineers, licensed mechanical and electrical engineers in addition to multiple ICC certified plans examiners and CASp experts. We have the ability to represent the City on major projects utilizing staff with the same professional licenses, experience, and training as required for the project designers.

Project Understanding:

BPR understands that the City of Stockton has seen significant growth in both the volume and complexity of projects within the City and at the Port of Stockton which has resulted in the need for the City to augment City staff with consultant services. Not only will this allow the City’s Building Department to maintain a high level of customer service but will also enable the City to access the expertise of additional structural engineers and CASp professionals.

We understand the City is looking for outside consultants to provide the following On-Call Services: Building Code Plan Review, Structural Engineering Plan Review, Inspection Services and OSHPD 3 Certifications. We are qualified, prepared and interested in provided these requested services.

As a principal of BPR Consulting Group, Ron Beehler is authorized to bind the firm to all commitments made in our proposal. We acknowledge and are in receipt of Addendum #1 dated 3/10/2022, a signed copy has been included with this proposal. Additionally, we are aware of the insurance requirements necessary should we be awarded a contract.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions concerning our qualifications or the services we provide.

Thank you for taking the time to review our proposal and we look forward to the opportunity to provide professional building department services on behalf of the City of Stockton.

Sincerely,

BPR CONSULTING GROUP
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO
Principal / Director of Client Services
Page #2 Attachment B 697

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
SECTION 4.3

REFERENCES
Over the past 20 years, BPR’s Principals have worked hard to develop a reputation within California for providing top quality, timely, and efficient building safety services in a professional, courteous manner, always in our clients’ best interests by honoring our commitment to provide timely superior services. We utilize our extensive experience and professional training to provide high level and thorough building department services for our clients. We believe our best advertisement is references from current and previous clients and we encourage you to contact our client references.

As requested in the RFP, below are client references from agencies where we have provided similar services to those requested by the City of Stockton:

A. Project Name: County of Madera Building Department Services B. Location of Project: County of Madera
C. Name, Title and Contact Information:

Matthew Treber, Chief of Development Services
200 W. 4th Street, Suite 3100, Madera, CA 93637
Ph: 559.675.7821 | Email: [email protected] D. Project Budget: Varies monthly based on building department activity and specific project sizes.

E. Date of Completion: Ongoing
Services Provided:

BPR Consulting group presently provides building official, out-sourced plan review, building inspection, and permit technician services on behalf of the County’s Building Department. Types of projects plan reviewed and inspected include residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, OSHPD3, and retail projects.

FEATURED PROJECT: Valley Children’s Hospital Materials Distribution Center 2 BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department and fire review of the Valley Children’s BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department and fire review of the Valley Children’s Hospital Materials Distribution Center. These two projects consisted of a new 25,314 S.F. single story warehouse building with a 1,813 S.F. mezzanine. The structure is Type II-B Construction with Occupancy Groups S-1 and B and is fully fire sprinklered. The building is constructed of structural steel framing, supporting steel roof decking. The roof structure is supported by steel bents and steel columns. The lateral force resisting system consists of steel moment frames and steel cross-bracing. The exterior walls consist of a combination of steel siding, stucco and stone veneer. The foundation for the structure consists of continuous footing at the perimeter of the building and typical spread pad footings at all columns and frames with a concrete slab-on-grade. The mezzanine is a steel framed self-supporting structure with a composite concrete over steel deck system. The lateral force resisting system for the mezzanine consists of steel braced frames.

Page #3 Attachment B 698

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Site improvements include Landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, retaining walls, concrete ramps, exterior stairs, accessible ramps, trash enclosures, screen walls, electrical transformer, backup generator and landscaping.

A. Project Name: City of Arroyo Grande Building Department Services B. Location of Project: City of Arroyo Grande
C. Name, Title and Contact Information:

Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director 1375 Ash Street, Arroyo Grande, CA, 93420
Ph: 805.473.5466 | Email: [email protected]
D. Project Budget: Varies monthly based on building department activity and specific project sizes.

E. Date of Completion: Ongoing
Services Provided:

BPR Consulting Group provides all building department services for the City under contract including building official, out-sourced plan review, building inspection and permit technician services. Types of projects reviewed and inspected include residential, commercial, OSHPD3, and retail projects.

FEATURED PROJECT: Walmart Remodel
BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services of the remodel of a 125,440 S.F. Walmart Store. The project is Type IIB Construction with Occupancy Groups M, B and R and is fully fire sprinklered. The remodel consisted of new exterior signage, upgraded interior finishes, installation of new racks and fixtures in both the stock room and on the sales floor, remodel and upgrade of existing restrooms, a new modular kitchen, installation of new coolers, installing new doors in the existing walls and upgrading the accessibility features on the site which included new truncated domes, restriping ADA parking and paths of travel and adding ADA signage.

A. Project Name: Rancho Cordova On-Call Building Department Services B. Location of Project: City of Rancho Cordova
C. Name, Title and Contact Information:

Joe Cuffe, Building Official
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Ph: 916.851.8866 | Email: [email protected] D. Project Budget: Varies monthly based on building department activity and size and scope of assigned projects.

E. Date of Completion: Ongoing
Page #4 Attachment B 699

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Services Provided:

Services include comprehensive building department plan review services for the City of Rancho Cordova including plan review of major projects including new buildings and significant tenant improvement projects. Types of projects reviewed and inspected by BPR staff include residential, multifamily, commercial, and multi-story projects, industrial projects and retail buildings.

FEATURED PROJECT: Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
The Logisticenter project consists of a new 155,076 S.F., one story shell building and associated site improvements. The proposed building will be of Type IIIB Constructions with Groups S-1 and B Occupancies and will be fully fire sprinklered. The construction of the building consists of a hybrid roof system constructed of plywood sheathing supported by wood sub-purlins which are supported by steel open-webbed truss joists and girders. The roof structure is supported by concrete walls at the perimeter of the building and steel columns at the interior of the building. The wall system consists of concrete “tilt-up” wall panels. The lateral force resisting system will consist of concrete shear walls at the perimeter of the building and a concentric steel braced frame at the interior of the building. The building is supported on continuous footings at the concrete perimeter walls and pad footings at the interior columns. The floor consists of a concrete slab-on-grade.

Site improvements include landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, retaining walls, concrete ramps, exterior stairs, accessible curb ramps, trash enclosures, screen walls and detention pond.

BPR Consulting Group is providing complete building department plan review services for this project including review of the site improvements and the accessibility review of the site.

In addition to the three (3) project references provided, we have included additional client references that can speak to BPR’s ability to provide top quality, timely, and efficient building safety services in a professional, courteous manner.

A. Project Name: Contract Building Department Services
B. Location of Project: City of Gardena
C: Name, Title and Contact Information:

Greg Tsujiuchi, Community Development Director
1700 West 162nd Street, Gardena, CA 90247
Ph: 310.217.9526 | Email: [email protected]
D. Project Budget: Varies monthly based on building department activity.

E. Date of Completion: Ongoing
Services Provided:

Page #5 Attachment B 700

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Building Official, plan review, building inspection and permit technician services. BPR presently provides most of the city’s building department services under contract. All minor projects are plan reviewed on-site, new buildings and major tenant improvements and remodel projects are reviewed in our offices in electronic format utilizing Bluebeam. Most of the daily requested building inspections are performed by BPR’s inspection staff. Our permit technicians accurately track all permit applications, calculate permit fees and issue building permits.

A. Project Name: Town of Yountville Full Service Building Department B. Location of Project: Town of Yountville
C. Name, Title and Contact Information
Steven Rogers, Town Manager
6550 Yount Street, Yountville, CA 94599
Ph: 707.944.8851 | Email: [email protected]
D. Project Budget: Varies monthly based on building department activity.

E. Date of Completion: Ongoing
Services Provided:

BPR staff provide comprehensive building department services for the Town of Yountville that include in-house building official, and all plan review and inspection services on behalf of the Town. BPR’s staff manages the Town of Yountville’s Building Department and provides plan review and inspection services for all construction projects in the Town of Yountville. Types of projects reviewed and inspected include residential, multi-family, commercial, hotels, churches, and retail projects.

Page #6 Attachment B 701

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
SECTION 4.4

FINANCIAL STATEMENT
As requested in the RFP, we have included a balance sheet and income statement which demonstrates BPR Consulting Group’s sound financial standing. We maintain adequate cash reserves to meet the ongoing business needs of our firm. Additionally, BPR has no outstanding debt and neither BPR nor any of its principals has ever filed for bankruptcy.

Page #7

CONFIDENTIAL
Due to the sensitive nature of this information, BPR respectfully requests the enclosed balance sheet and income statement remain confidential.

Attachment B 702

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
SECTION 4.5

CORPORATE STRUCTURE/ORGANIZATION
BPR Consulting Group was founded by a group of experienced veterans of the building safety industry with the sole focus of providing thorough and efficient plan review and other building department services on behalf of California communities.

Our leadership team has worked together for nearly 20 years and collectively possesses more than 100 years of experience providing building safety services to cities, counties, state agencies and other municipal agencies throughout California and the western United States. Our focus is to support California building departments in a professional manner by providing efficient, timely and professional building safety services for the communities we serve. We have extensive experience providing all aspects of building department services, including complete building department staffing and management services. We presently provide building department services similar to those being requested to multiple building departments throughout California. We are also experienced in providing plan review, inspection and permit technician services for high profile and unique projects. Out team of licensed structural, civil, mechanical, electrical and fire protection engineers have provided plan review services for multiple high rise, multi-use podium, multi family, industrial, historic and adaptive reuse projects throughout California. In addition to high quality building plan review services our proposed team has extensive experience providing plan review of on-site civil improvements and review for compliance with established conditions of approval unique to specific projects.

Our Building Safety staff consists of the following: California licensed structural, civil, mechanical, electrical and fire protection engineers; Certified Access Specialist (CASp) professionals; ICC-certified building officials, plans examiners, inspectors, permit technicians, and highly experienced administrative personnel.

Building department services we provide to municipalities and agencies include:
 Building safety plan review services
 Building Official services
 Building inspection services
 Building Department management services
 CASp plan review and inspection services
 Fire prevention plan review and inspection services
 Structural engineering plan review services
 Civil plan review and inspection services
BPR Consulting Group maintains a staff of highly qualified Building Officials, Engineers, Plans Examiners, Building Inspectors, and Permit Technicians. All of our staff maintain appropriate certifications or professional licenses for the services they provide. We encourage our staff to continually obtain additional certifications and support ongoing training and education for our staff. Our focus is to maintain the highest and best qualified building department staff in the industry. BPR’s staff has a proven track record of providing high quality and timely services on behalf of the public agencies we serve. BPR has the necessary resources available to immediately provide all the proposed services to the City of Stockton.

Page #8 Attachment B 703

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
For the City of Stockton, we have selected a team of appropriately licensed, experienced, and available staff to provide the requested building plan review, structural plan review and inspection services on an on-call basis.

We believe our clients are best served by assigning a group of appropriately qualified staff to serve specific clients with additional staff available as needed for peak workload demands and to provide specialized services unique to specific projects. We believe this approach best serves our clients’ needs through consistency and continuity of services provide by our same team members. The Organization Chart below provides an overview of the staff available to serve the City of Stockton.

Page #9 Attachment B 704

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR

PROPOSED TEAM
The founders of BPR share the values of providing quality services and a very high level of customer service to our clients. Our focus is to support California building departments in a professional manner allowing our clients to provide efficient, timely and professional building safety services for the communities they serve. We have extensive experience in all aspects of building safety, including the comprehensive plan review and inspection services that the City is requesting.

Below you will find an introduction to our proposed Principal-in-Charge, key personnel and additional staff available to serve the City. Folloiwng the brief biographies are the team’s respective licenses and certifications and relevant project experience. Complete resumes are included in the Appendix.

PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE / STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW Ron is licensed as a Civil and Structural Engineer in California and Nevada, certified by the International Code Council as a Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector, Ron is uniquely qualified to evaluate and manage all building department services. He utilizes experience gained through more than 35 years of hands-on experience performing life safety, accessibility and structural plan reviews to successfully manage building department plan review services, including building department plan review services for high-profile projects on behalf of public agencies throughout California. Ron’s experience includes establishing and coordinating on-site building department services for large multi-building projects and unique fast paced development projects. His background includes the position of Chief Building Official with the City of Sacramento directing a staff of 120 engineers, plan reviewers and building inspectors, Chief of Engineering Design and Construction for the California National Guard and Senior Structural Engineer/Regional Compliance Officer with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). Ron has served as Chief Building Official for multiple California public agencies including interim assignments. Ron will manage all contract and billing issues and will be the individual authorized to negotiate and execute the Consultant Services Agreement with the City. Years of Experience: 39

KEY PERSONNEL
Bill Rodgers, SE PROJECT MANAGER / STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW Bill is a California licensed civil and structural engineer with over 30 years of experience in the field of structural engineering, including over 20 years of experience as a plan review engineer. Bill has worked closely with Building Departments across the State of California and Nevada for over 20 years and has assisted government agencies with numerous projects throughout the years. His wealth of experience includes managing plan review services throughout California and Nevada on behalf of public agency clients and performing structural plan review for commercial and residential projects. In addition to providing structural plan Page #10 Attachment B 705

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
review services, Bill is responsible for the production and performance of BPR’s offices, including maintaining client relationships. Years of Experience: 30
Roger Peterson, SE PLAN REVIEW MANAGER / STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW Roger is a California licensed civil and Structural Engineer, and an experienced building safety professional with 35 years of experience in structural design and building plan review. Roger has designed and provided plan review services for single and multi-story steel, and concrete-framed buildings, as well as structures utilizing timber, and masonry framing systems. Roger’s design experience includes schools, commercial and industrial projects, micro-chip production facilities, power plant installations and multi-family residential projects. Rogers experience includes plan review of numerous high-profile and fast paced multistory building projects for multiple public agency clients including management of inspection programs for these same types of projects. Roger utilizes his detailed code knowledge, extensive design experience and on-site construction project experience to ensure accurate, thorough, and timely plan review and inspection services on behalf of municipal client agencies. Years of Experience: 35 Andrew Burke, CASp, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Andrew is a Certified Access Specialist and ICC certified Plans Examiner with more than 17 years of industry experience in plan review, inspection, administration and estimating. Andrew has extensive plan check experience in multi-story mixed use projects and provides in-depth review of accessibility issues to ensure compliance with all California building codes. His CASp certification provides him the ability to ensure all aspects of accessibility have been achieved. His formal training in ICC codes, as well as on-the-job experience, allows him to provide thorough and accurate commercial and residential plan reviews and inspections. Andrew is an excellent asset to any building department both in the office and out in the field. Years of Experience: 11 Mark Berg, CBO, MCP, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Mark is an ICC Certified Building Official, Master Code Professional, Plans Examiner, and Building Inspector with experience performing life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and fire reviews for residential, multi-family and commercial projects. Mark has successfully worked with building department staff to provide plan review and inspection services for all phases of complex construction projects. Mark is an exceptional and detailorientedplans examinerwith the ability to work with project designers and project applicants to successfully resolve plan related issues in an efficient and customer focused manner. Years of Experience: 31 David Castillo, ME, FPE PLAN REVIEW
David brings more than 35 years of breadth, depth, and knowledge of mechanical engineering, design, and plan review to any project. A California licensed professional Mechanical Engineer and Fire Protection Engineer, his expertise encompasses HVAC, Plumbing, Medical Gases, and Fire Sprinklers. David’s background includes mechanical engineering, design, and plan review of multi-story commercial and residential buildings including buildings utilizing smoke control systems, shopping malls, industrial and manufacturing facilities, multi-family residential projects, commercial kitchens, and food processing facilities. David has engineered and designed Acute Page #11 Attachment B 706

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Care Hospitals, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Surgery Clinics, Psychiatric Hospitals, Pharmaceutical Plants, Industrial Plants, Educational Facilities, and Hi-Rise Commercial Buildings. Years of Experience: 36 Jerome Schreiber, EE, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Jerome has nearly 40 years of electrical industry experience. He is a licensed electrical engineer in California and Hawaii and is certified by the International Association of Electrical Inspectors as an Electrical Plans Examiner and Electrical inspector. Jerome has extensive experience an electrical plans examiner in addition to his experience providing engineering services to the military, public utilities, private organizations and municipal agencies. Years of Experience: 39
Richard Maddox, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Richard brings over 25 years of experience in all aspects of plan review and building inspections. Richard provides accurate and complete electrical plan reviews of residential and commercial buildings. In order to maintain his extensive electrical code knowledge Richard participates in electrical industry events and maintains membership in electrical industry professional organizations including IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW. Richard maintains his electrical plan review and inspection skills by regularly participating in industry and code related training and attending electrical safety and electrical industry symposiums. Years of Experience: 27 Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC INSPECTION / PLAN REVIEW
For over 30 years, Mark served as a Building Official, Deputy Building Official, Building Inspector, Plans Examiner and Permit Coordinator for the City and County of Madera and the City of Clovis. He has implemented permit tracking software for multiple jurisdictions, prepared operating budgets and managed all facets of building department activities. He currently supervises inspection services for multiple central valley clients and provides plan review services for residential and commercial projects . Years of Experience: 31 Dan Garcia, PE, REA, CPP CIVIL ONSITE & GRADING REVIEW
Dan is a licensed civil engineer with approximately 38 years of public works engineering and project management experience. He has served in senior and executive management public works positions with the cities of Maywood, Costa Mesa, Norwalk, El Segundo, Solvang, Culver City, and Novato. Dan possesses extensive experience providing plan review services for grading, pad preparation, on-site civil improvements, paving, stormwater collection systems, and on-site stormwater retention systems. Years of Experience: 38

ADDITIONAL STAFF
Tim Scott, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW
For the past 20 years Tim has provided building safety services on behalf of Northern California communities. Tim maintains extensive ICC certifications and has years of experience providing plan review and inspection services in support of Northern California building departments. Tim’s experience as a Deputy Building Official exposed him to the many facets of managing a Building Department and allowed him to develop the exceptional organizational and management skills necessary to provide superior services to the communities he serves. Tim’s experience includes plan review and inspection for all types and sizes of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, institutional, and industrial projects. He is familiar with multiple permit tracking software systems utilized by Page #12 Attachment B 707

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
jurisdictions and has managed all facets of building department services. Tim currently provides plan review and inspection services on behalf of BPR’s municipal clients. Years of Experience: 22 Isidoro Zapien, ICC PLAN REVIEW / INSPECTION
Isidoro is a ICC certified commercial building inspector with many years experience. In addition to his commercial building inspection experience Isidoro has extensive experience providing special inspections of structural steel and welding, high strength bolting, spray applied fireproofing, structural masonry and reinforced concrete. Isidoro is also nuclear gauge certified with experience in soils and asphalt. He has performed various inspection services including quality assurance and quality control to ensure projects were built in accordance with approved plans, specifications and specified codes. Years of Experience: 25
Rick Walters, CASp, LEED, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW / INSPECTION Rick has over numerous years of experience in the construction industry with over 30 of those years in the Building Inspection industry. Rick has experience as a building official, plans examiner, and inspector. He has provided senior inspector services in disaster zones for floods and wildfires which required communication with the National Guard, elected officials and law enforcement. Additionally, Rick is experienced in inspection management, council meetings, planning meetings, city and county design review meetings, field inspections, permit tracking and issuance, record keeping, construction techniques, and office procedures. Rick presently serves clients providing plan review and inspection services. Years of Experience: 33 William Van Ryn, ICC INSPECTION
William is an experienced Building Inspector with 15 years of on-the-job experience. In addition to maintaining certification as a commercial and residential building inspector, Wil is skilled in residential/commercial electrical, mechanical, plumbing, energy and greencode requirements. He is self-motivated and performs detailed inspections of assigned projects, always working with builders and project managers to find solutions to challenging code related issues.. He also possesses supervisory experience and leadership skills in the field. Years of Experience: 15 Landon Collins, ICC INSPECTION
Landon has 17 years of experience in the construction industry. He is an ICC certified commercial and combination residentialinspector with experience providing building, mechanical, electrical and plumbing inspections in support of residential projects well as providing commercial building inspections for Cities and Counties. He provides Building Department inspection services to ensure projects were built in accordance with approved plans, specifications and specified codes. Landon also bring considerable construction industry experience gained from working for several construction companies in the Central Valley Region. Years of Experience: 17 Stacy Barker, ICC PERMIT TECHNICIAN
Stacy is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with six years of experience providing services to multiple Northern California municipal clients. In addition to her technical abilities, Stacy has excellent customer service skills that help her to work well with applicants and City staff. She is efficient in the use of the GreenVue’s Digital Permit Suite, Accela Automation, Community Core, as well as other municipal tracking systems. Years of Experience: 6 Page #13 Attachment B 708

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Alicia Ventura, ICC PERMIT TECHNICIAN
Aliciais an ICC Certified Permit Technician with over nineyears of experience providing services to multiple California municipal clients. Alicia is well versed in her role as a Permit Technician and has worked with several municipal tracking systems including Accela and Trakit. In addition to her technical abilities, Alicia has excellent customer service skills that help her to work well with applicants and City staff. In addition, Alicia is fluent in Spanish, proficient with Microsoft Office software including Word, Excel and PowerPoint, is detail oriented and is able to multi-task.

Years of Experience: 9
Samantha Barker, ICC PERMIT TECHNICIAN
Samantha is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with experience providing Permit Technician services in support for municipal building departments. Samantha’s experience includes updating data bases, data input, permit tracking system management, and report generation. In addition to her technical abilities, Samantha utilizes her excellent customer service skills to assist department customers, applicants, and City staff. Samantha is efficient, detail oriented and possesses the ability to multi-task. Years of Experience: 2

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications
License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO,
ICC
Sr. Structural Engineer
Principal-in-Charge
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
NV Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Structural Engineer
CABO Certified Building Official
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Building Inspector
C39404
S3632
CE019992
SE019992
1492
801789
801789
801789
801789
12/31/2023
12/31/2023
12/31/2022
12/31/2022
---
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
Bill Rodgers, SE
Sr. Structural Engineer
Project Manager
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Structural Engineer
S4198
C50673
CE18427
SE18427
09/30/2023
09/30/2023
12/31/2023
12/31/2023
Roger Peterson, SE
Sr. Structural Engineer
Plan Review Manager
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
ID Registered Professional Civil Engineer
ID Registered Professional Structural Engineer
C46096
S3846
C8225
S8225
12/31/2022
12/31/2022
06/30/2022
06/30/2022
Mark Berg, ICC
ICC Master Code
Professional
Plan Review
Inspection
ICC Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner
ICC Building Code Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Certified Fire Code Official
ICC Certified Fire Marshal
ICC Combination Dwelling Inspector - Uniform
Codes
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
12/11/2022
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
10/28/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
Page #14 Attachment B 709

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications
License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
ICC Combination Inspector - Legacy
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Fire Code Specialist
ICC Fire Codes and Standards
ICC Fire Inspector I
ICC Fire Inspector II
ICC Fire Plans Examiner
ICC Master Code Professional
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Permit Specialist
ICC Permit Technician
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Residential Energy Inspector/Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
04/27/2023
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
10/05/2024
07/14/2024
10/03/2024
10/02/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
10/18/2022
04/08/2024
David Castillo,
ME/FPE
Mechanical Engineer
Fire Protection Engr.

Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer
CA Registered Fire Protection Engineer
M31455
FP2013
12/31/2022
03/31/2023
Jerome Schreiber
Electrical Engineer
Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
HI Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
ICC CA Commercial Building Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
EE12290
EE13259
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
9/30/2022
n/a
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
Rick Maddox, ICC
Electrical
Plan Review
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Combination Inspector
ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Master Electrician (NV)
ATC 20 Post Disaster Training
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
000-001221
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
---
Andrew Burke, CASp,
ICC
Certified Access
Specialist
Plan Review
Certified Access Specialist
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Permit Technician
CASp-710
8250398
8250398
8250398
8250398
8250398
08/12/2022
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
Page #15 Attachment B 710

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications
License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
Tim Scott, CBO, ICC
Plan Review
Inspection
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist B8
ICC California Building Plans Examiner I6
ICC California Residential Combination Inspector
J5
ICC California Residential Inspector J1
ICC California Residential Electrical Inspector J2
ICC California Residential Plumbing Inspector J3
ICC California Residential Mechanical Inspector J4
ICC California Commercial Building Inspector I1
ICC California Commercial Plumbing Inspector I3
ICC California Commercial Mechanical Inspector I4
ICC Accessibility Inspector / Plans Examiner
ICC Plumbing Inspector P5
ICC Building Inspector B5
ICC Building Inspector UBC
ICC Mechanical Inspector M5
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Building Plans Examiner B3
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
Mark Meyers, CBO,
ICC
Inspections
Plan Review
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Plumbing Code UPC
ICC Building Inspection
ICC Plumbing Inspection
ICC Plans Examiner
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
Rick Walters, CASp,

LEED, CBO, ICC
Certified Access
Specialist
Plan Review
Inspection
Certified Access Specialist
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Electrical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC CA Building Plans Examiner
ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Electrical Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
CASp-439
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
08/02/2024
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
Page #16 Attachment B 711

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications
License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
ICC CA Residential Building Inspector
ICC Building Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Commercial Combination Inspector
CA LEED Certified LEED AP BD+C
IAPMO Certified Plumbing Inspector
IAPMO Certified Mechanical Inspector
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
10436985
030666
090146
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
---
---
---
Will Van Ryn, ICC
Inspections
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Residential Building Inspector
ICC Building Inspector
8002321
8002321
8002321
04/25/2024
04/25/2024
04/25/2024
Ed Jakubowski, CBO,
ICC
Inspections
ICC Residential Building Inspector
ICC Residential Plumbing Inspector
8232461
8232461
10/31/2023
10/31/2023
Isidoro Zapien, ICC
Inspections
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Reinforced Concrete Special Inspection
ICC Spray Applied Fire Proofing Special Inspector
ICC Structural Welding Special Inspector
ICC Structural Masonry Special Inspector
ICC Structural Steel & Bolting Special Inspector
AWS Associate Certified Welding Inspector
ACI Concrete Field-Testing Technician Grade I
Nuclear Density Testing Gauge Certified
5003730
5003730
5003730
5003730
5003730
5003730
01110444
030005
12495
09/27/2024
09/01/2023
09/01/2023
09/01/2023
09/01/2023
09/01/2023
---
---
---
Landon Collins, ICC
Inspections
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Residential Building Inspector
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC Residential Electrical Inspector
ICC Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
8984654
8984654
8984654
8984654
8984654
8984654
8984654
8984654
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
Dan Garcia, PE, REA,
CPP
Civil Site and Grading
Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer 45710 12/31/2022 Stacy Barker, ICC
Permit Technician
ICC Permit Technician 8821141 12/09/2023
Alicia Ventura, ICC
Permit Technician
ICC Permit Technician 9560759 9/12/2024
Samantha Barker, ICC
Permit Technician
ICC Permit Technician 10138242 11/08/2024
Page #17 Attachment B 712

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR

EXPERIENCE
Seamlessly integrating municipal service professionals in support of public agencies is BPR Consulting Group’s sole purpose and the basis on which we were founded. BPR’s staff have extensive experience providing the same services as being requested by the City of Stockton to communities of comparable size throughout California. Our focus is to support California building departments in a professional manner allowing our clients the ability to provide efficient, timely and professional building safety services for their communities. We have extensive experience providing all aspects of building safety services in support of building departments, including building code plan review, structural engineering plan review and inspection services. We have worked with public agencies throughout California to provide these same services.

The following is a small sampling of projects for which BPR’s staff have provided plan review services.

CITY OF CLEARLAKE
Oak Valley Villas Apartments
BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services for the 80 unit apartment complex. The apartment complex consists of three 19,379 SF, three story apartment buildings, one 19930 SF, three story apartment building, one 6,803 SF, two story apartment building and a 3,498 SF single story community building. The three-story apartment buildings consists of Type VA Construction with R-2 Occupancy. The two-story apartment consisted of Type VB Construction with R-2 Occupancy. The Community Building consists of Type VB Construction with B and A-3 Occupancies. All buildings are fully fire sprinklered.

The apartment buildings contain (20) one-bedroom units, (36) two-bedroom units, (18) three bedroom units and (6) four-bedroom units.

The buildings are constructed of typical wood framed construction with manufactured floor and roof trusses being supported by wood stud bearing walls. The foundation system consists of continuous spread and isolated footings with a concrete slab on grade at the ground level. The lateral force resisting system consists of light frame wood walls sheathed with wood structural shear panels. The exterior finish consists of a combination of stucco, cementitious board & batten siding, and cementitious clapboard siding. BPR’s staff provided complete plan review services for this project on behalf of the City Clearlake.

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK
Costco Warehouse & Fuel Station:

BPR’s staff provided building department plan review services on behalf of the City of Monterey Park for the new Costco Warehouse and Fuel Station project. Plan review services included plan review of the non-structural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, green and energy efficiency improvements associated with the project. The 154,974 SF tilt-up warehouse building utilized Type VB Construction. The fueling station utilized Type ll-B Construction.

The building was classified as a Group M Occupancy.

Page #18 Attachment B 713

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Pacific Plaza Mixed-Use Hotel and Condominium:

BPR’s staff members provided complete building plan review services for the Pacific Plaza Monterey Park project which was designed as a mixed-use project to include Hotel, Condominium and Restaurant uses. The project includes 398,792 SF within five levels above two levels of underground parking. The project utilized Construction Type I-A at the two lower parking levels and Construction Type III-A above the 2nd level. The building includes Occupancy Groups A-2, A-3, M, B and S-2.

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Orange County Museum of Arts:

BPR’s staff members provided plan review services for this twolevel state-of-the-art museum housed is within an ultra-modern 52,000 SF building which emulates the art treasures the building was designed to showcase. The building boasts over 25,000 SF dedicated to exhibitions of modern art with the remainder of the building area dedicated to art displays and supporting function uses. A 10,000 SF portion of the interior space was designed to accommodate multipurpose, education and performance uses.

The projects design includes a rooftop terrace to accommodate up to 1,000 people for special events and outdoor displays.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Holiday Inn Express:

BPR’s staff members provided complete building department plan review services for this new 4-story, 62,849 SF hotel. This highprofile project was designed utilizing wood platform framing with sheathed shear-walls and steel moment frames for lateral support.

The building utilized Construction Type V-A and was classified as a Group R-1 Occupancy. All plan review services for this project were provided on an expedited basis.

CITY OF SAN RAMON
Aspen Woods Apartments:

BPR staff provided plan review services for this new, 95-unit, senior complex. The facility consists of a basement and 4 floor levels totaling 139,281 SF. This podium style project utilized Type IA and VA construction and included S-2 and R-2 Occupancy Groups. Above the podium structure, western-style platform construction was utilized along with site-built, wood-sheathed, shear walls for lateral support for this exclusive residential project.

Page #19 Attachment B 714

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR

CITY OF VALLEJO
The Lodge at Glen Cove:

BPR staff provided plan review services on behalf of the City of Vallejo for this new, residential, care facility that provides Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care
options for its residents. The facility consists of two, threestory buildings totaling 120,312 SF. This project utilized Type VA Construction and included A-2, R2.1, B and S
Occupancy Groups.

CITY OF RICHMOND
BPR staff members have provided complete plan review services for projects on behalf of the City of Richmond for many years. Below are examples of recent projects for which our staff members provided plan review services:

Noma Residential Development: BPR staff provided complete building department plan review services for the Places at Noma which consist of 95, three-story, single-family, detached homes; and the Rows at Noma, which consist of 18, three-story, live/work townhomes with ten different configurations. All buildings are Type V-B Construction with Group R-3 and Group U Occupancies. All buildings are platform-framed wood and are supported on conventional-spread, concrete footings with a slab-on-grade system at the first-floor level. The lateral force resisting system consisted of site-built, wood-sheathed, shear walls. BPR’s staff teleconferenced and/or met with the design team to resolve plan review issues in an efficient and collaborative manner.

Tilt Up Warehouse and Distribution Facility: BPR staff provided complete building department plan review services on behalf of the City of Richmond for this project. This project consists of a single-story, tilt-up warehouse and distribution center with 191,500 SF of warehouse area and 12,000 SF of office space, for a total area of 203,500 SF. The building was constructed of Type III-B Construction and included Type S-1 and B Occupancies and is fully fire sprinklered. Site improvements included trash enclosures, rolling metal gates, steel fencing and concrete site walls. Submitted documents were reviewed for compliance with the applicable provisions of the adopted building codes and associated standards. BPR staff teleconferenced and/or met with the design team to resolve plan review issues.

OSHPD 3 Community Clinic: BPR staff provided complete building department plan review services of the Community Clinic project on behalf of the City of Richmond. This project included construction of a three-story, Community Clinic with a total area of 33,742 SF of medical office space designed to be OSHPD 3 compliant. The building utilized Type V-B Construction and included Occupancy Groups B and A-3. The building is fully fire sprinklered. Site improvements included trash enclosures and concrete site walls as part of the project. Plan Page #20 Attachment B 715

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
review services required review for compliance with all applicable OSHPD 3 provisions of the California Building Code. BPR staff teleconferenced and/or met with the design team to resolve plan review issues, as needed.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Downtown Commons Tower:

BPR staff provided plan review services for this 16-story, mixed-use tower constructed of cast-in-place reinforced concrete utilizing a code compliant structural concrete shear wall system for lateral support.

This architecturally significant state-of-the-art project serves as a center piece for the Downtown Commons community and is located directly adjacent to the new Sacramento Kings Arena. The 16-story, mixed-use tower includes two levels of subterranean parking. The lower three levels above grade include retail space, restaurant space, hotel lobbies, conference rooms, ballrooms, a pool deck, and back-of-house spaces. The fourth level includes office space. Levels 5 through 10 were designed for hotel use, and Level 11 through 16 will include residential units. BPR’s staff provided progressive plan review services for this project with an expediated schedule on behalf of the City of Sacramento. BPR staff members successfully assisted the city, the design team, and the Owner to implement and execute an aggressive phased permitting schedule, allowing this significant and complicated project to move quickly into construction.

CITY OF HANFORD
New Hanford Fire Station:

BPR’s staff provided complete plan review for this new
5,289 SF fire station consisting of group R-2, B and S-1 occupancy classifications and constructed of Type VB
Construction. The estimated project cost was $2,000,000.

The new fire station will supportthree personnel during duty hours and provide responsive service to the southwest and west area of Hanford with a focus on improving response times to better serve the growing community.

New Costco Warehouse:

BPR’s staff members provided building department plan
review services on behalf of the City of Hanford Building Department for a new Costco Warehouse project. Services included plan review of the architectural, structural,
mechanical, plumbing, electrical and energy conservation designs associated with construction of the project.

Accessibility features were also reviewed to ensure
compliance with applicable accessibility provisions of the adopted California Building Codes.

Page #21 Attachment B 716

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR

CITY OF FRESNO
Community Regional Medical Center:

BPR staff members provided plan review services for
the Fresno Community Regional Medical Center
(CRMC) expansion – a 58-acre, $350 million project
comprised of a 5-story, 180,000 SF Medical Office
Building and a 5-story Parking Structure with
approximately 427,900 SF of parking. BPR’s staff
provided complete building department plan review
services for the CRMC Medical Office Building and
Parking Structure. Submitted documents were
reviewed for compliance with the applicable provisions of the codes and associated standards as adopted by the City of Fresno.

The CRMC Medical Office Building was constructed utilizing structural steel framing supporting composite concrete over steel decking at the floor and roof levels. The foundation utilized conventional spread footings.

The lateral force resisting system was designed to utilize moment resisting steel frames. The exterior cladding for the project included light gauge steel framing supporting anodized aluminum panels and glazing. The Medical Office Building includes occupancy classifications B, S, and I-2.1, and Construction Type IA and is a fully sprinkled building.

The CRMC Parking Structure was constructed utilizing post-tensioned cast-in-place concrete slabs supported by post-tensioned cast-in-place concrete beams, which in turn are supported by conventionally reinforced castin-place concrete columns. The lateral force resisting system consisted of concrete shear walls and concrete moment frames. The exterior cladding was designed to incorporate precast concrete wall panels.

CITY OF INGLEWOOD
Hollywood Park Retail, Office, Residential & Associated Parking BPR staff members provided complete architectural,
structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing plan
review services in support of this mixed-use building
project located adjacent to the LA Rams stadium in
Inglewood California.

The project included an outdoor lifestyle mall with
approximately 516,100 SF of retail and office space along with a 320,000 SF four-level parking structure designed to accommodate 954 vehicles. Site improvements for the
mall included circulation drives, surface parking areas, underground utilities, and extensive landscaping. Exterior amenities for the state-of-the-art outdoor mall include an amphitheater, chef’s garden, sports court, public gathering areas, event stage, children’s play area, and promenade.

Page #22 Attachment B 717

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
The outdoor mall project is being constructed in two phases with 24 architecturally unique retail buildings sited within the 29-acre mall footprint arranged in a manner to maximize space utilization while maintaining a vibrant and energetic ambiance. The outdoor mall buildings included Occupancy Types A-1, A-2, A-5, B, M, F-1, S-2, and H-2. Construction types for the outdoor mall included Construction Types l-B, ll-B, and l-A.

The project also includes a 432,000 SF, 7-level smoke-controlled office building with one level below grade with a 36,000 SF podium structure at grade planned for use as a television studio. The office building will include Occupancy Types B and F-1, and will be Construction Type l-B. The office building and podium structure was designed utilizing both Risk Categories 2 and 3. This was accomplished thru utilization of a structural seismic separation allowing each structural system to respond to wind and seismic forces independently. The office building project also includes a seven level, 550,000 SF parking structure of Type ll-B Construction designed to accommodate 1,650 vehicles
The residential component of the project included two residential buildings including a 443,753 SF, 5-level mixed use podium style residential building and a 4-level 354.000 SF mixed use podium style residential building. The five-level building included four levels of Type V-A Construction over one level of Type 1-A Construction. The four-level building included three levels of Type V-A Construction over one level of Type 1-A Construction. The buildings will include Occupancy Groups R-2, S-2, A-3, M, B and S-1. The buildings will include approximately 404 residential units, amenity spaces and parking areas to accommodate over 600 vehicles situated beneath the residential units in the lower podium levels. Both buildings will be fully fire sprinklered.

Page #23 Attachment B 718

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
The following is a small sampling of projects for which BPR’s staff have provided building inspection services:

CITY OF GARDENIA
BPR staff implemented building inspection services to eliminate a three-week inspection backlog. BPR added inspection staff to eliminate the inspection backlog until next day inspection services were achieved then reduced staff to a level necessary to meet daily inspection service requirements. BPR continues to work with the City of Gardena providing high quality and efficient plan review, inspection and permit technician services.

COUNTY OF MADERA
BPR staff provided inspection services utilizing multiple inspection staff allowing the county to meet their significant inspection workload. Immediately upon selection BPR staffed qualified building inspection staff as needed to reduce inspection service overloads and to ensure the county’s commitment to next day inspection services are maintained. BPR also provides Inspector of Record, IOR, services for multiple county sponsored capital improvement projects including ongoing hall of justice and new fire station projects.

CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
BPR staff provides inspection services to address all inspection services for the community utilizing the services of appropriately qualified and certified inspection staff. Through BPR’s inspection services the City is able to maintain next day inspections for all ongoing construction projects.

TOWN OF YOUNTVILLE
BPR staff provides inspection services to address all inspection services for the community utilizing the services of appropriately qualified and certified inspection staff. Through BPR’s inspection services the Town is able to maintain next day inspections for all ongoing construction projects.

Page #24 Attachment B 719

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
SECTION 4.6

APPROACH & PROJECT SCHEDULE
Our team has a proven track record of providing efficient and predictable building department services in support of California communities and for unique and fast paced building projects. Our key objectives in providing these services in support of the City of Stockton are as follows:
 To provide Complete Building Department
services. We have extensive experience
providing all aspects of building department
services on behalf of California communities. We
will utilize our skills and experience to work with
City staff and others to maintain established
service levels for all services that the department
provides in a professional, cooperative and
coordinated manner.
 To provide timely and responsive plan review
services. Our well qualified and professionally licensed team of plans examiners will provide you with comprehensive, efficient and timely building department plan review services including clear communication of plan review results. We will work with you to tailor our services to align with your unique and specific community needs. Our experienced and licensed team of structural engineers will ensure an appropriate level of structural plan review is provided for all assigned projects.  To be responsive to your specific inspection staffing needs. As construction and development activity fluctuates within your community, we will provide qualified and certified inspection staff to support your building department and adjust our service levels as needed to maintain seamless service to your customers.
 To provide staff who have the appropriate experience, certifications, and knowledge. We will utilize appropriately experienced, licensed, qualified, and certified staff to perform all identified services.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
BPR understands that the City of Stockton is the 13th largest city in California with a population of over 320,000.

The city is a multi-ethnic and multicultural city with a strong agricultural history and growing urban destination.

The City’s Community Development Department/Building and Life Safety Division oversees all construction within the City, including construction activity at the Port of Stockton. The City has experienced significant growth in both volume and complexity of the projects which has led the City to augment City staff with consultant services. The utilization of qualified building safety consultant staff will not only ensure a high level of customer service but will also enable the City to access the expertise of additional structural engineers and CASp professionals as needed to meet project demands.

Page #25 Attachment B 720

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
From our review of the RFP, we understand the City is looking to partner with qualified professionals to provide the following On-Call Services:
• Building Code Plan Review
• Structural Engineering Plan Review
• Inspection Services
• CASp Compliance
• OSHPD3 Certification
• Permit Processing Services
BPR is prepared to immediately commence services and assign appropriately licensed/certified and qualified staff to provide these services in a timely and cost-effective manner while adapting to the City’s established processes and procedures. From the RFP we understand the following related to the requested services:

BUILDING CODE & STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
• Services will include but are not limited to building code plan review and structural plan review to verify substantial compliance with all adopted California building codes and standards. We understand that our plan review services will include verification that established conditions of approval have been properly integrated within the project documents.
• The City will transmit all plan review requests to the selected consultant via Bluebeam Revu software platform. Our team has extensive experience using Bluebeam Revu and is prepared to perform plan review and accept project submittals from the City utilizing this software. The City will provide access to permitting and electronic plan review software as required. • BPR staff will perform plan reviews as requested by the City to verify compliance with the City of Stockton Municipal Code requirements and the current edition of the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Parts 1- Building Standard Administrative Code, Part 2 - Building Code Volumes 1 & 2, Part 2.5 - Residential Building Code, Part 3 - Electrical Code, Part 4 - Mechanical Code, Part 5 - Plumbing Code, Part 6 - Energy Code, Part 8 - Historical Building Code, Part 9 - Fire Code, Part 10 - Existing Building Code, Part 11 - Green Building Standards Code, and Part 12 - Reference Standards Code. Plan reviews will cover structural, fire & life safety, accessibility compliance, energy conservation, green building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical installations in residential, commercial, industrial, existing, and historical buildings.
• All plan review submittals, including resubmittals, will be submitted directly to the City. The City will transmit all plans and corresponding project documentation to BPR for review and approval. The City will transmit all plan review projects to BPR through the Bluebeam Revu® software platform using the standard built-in invite function of Bluebeam. BPR staff has extensive experience utilizing Bluebeam with numerous public agency clients.
• After review, BPR staff will develop and provide the City's Building & Life Safety Division and applicant with a complete and legible list of all corrections for each plan review performed. When the plan check and recheck processes are complete and the plans are deemed in full code compliance, BPR staff will Page #26 Attachment B 721

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
electronically stamp and sign the electronic plans and corresponding documents. Each page of the plans and corresponding documents will be stamped and will include the BPR logo, scope of Proponent's review, and be marked "Approved." All plan reviews will be performed by staff possessing all necessary and current certifications required by state law to conduct such reviews. • Initial plan review and all subsequent rechecks will be completed within an agreed upon timeframe.

The City's Building Official may, upon demonstration of good cause, extend the timeframe at his or her sole discretion.
• Compensation for plan review fees charged by BPR are subject to negotiations with the following considerations: BPR will provide expedited plan review services upon request of the City's Building Official; Projects with construction valuations exceeding $2,000,000 shall be billed at an agreed upon hourly rate; For plan reviews of repetitive buildings or elements for a single project, the City and BPR will negotiate an appropriate fee.
• BPR staff assigned to provide services to the city will be equipped with the necessary tools and equipment to perform the services as requested. Any staff performing services at City facilities will possess photo identification badges.

Plan Review Approach
• All of BPR Consulting Group’s plan review services
are closely managed from the moment a project is
assigned to completion of our services. Once a
project is assigned it is entered into our custom
designed plan review database. The project
documents are then triaged for completeness and
to identify if any documents necessary for plan
review have not been provided. Upon completion of
the triage process, plans examiners are assigned as
warranted by the scope of the proposed work associated with the specific project. All projects are closely monitored to ensure assigned staff have the time necessary in their schedules to comprehensively review assigned projects to maintain completion schedules. • We assign a dedicated team of plans examiners to serve specific clients so your BPR plan review team will remain consistent throughout the term of the agreement. We believe assigning a dedicated team of plans examiners best serves the needs of our clients, with our firm you will not have randomly assigned plans examiners assigned to each project. All plan review services are closely monitored by our plan review supervisors and managers for consistency, thoroughness, and quality. We utilize a discipline approach to our plan review services, assigning a life safety reviewer, structural reviewer, electrical reviewer, mechanical/plumbing reviewer, grading/utility reviewer and fire reviewer as appropriate to each assigned project based on the proposed scope of work. We believe utilizing a discipline approach provides a more comprehensive plan review as each reviewer is a specialist in their discipline. Each plans examiner includes their email address and desk phone number with their plan review comments to facilitate direct and efficient communication between project designers and our Page #27 Attachment B 722

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
professional plans examination staff. Our Plan Review Manager reviews each project for thoroughness and accuracy prior to plan review comments being issued or prior to recommendation of approval for permit purposes.
• Upon award of a contract, our proposed Project Manager will schedule a meeting with the City’s representative to familiarize the team with the City’s plan review process, methods and style. BPR’s staff of engineers and plans examiners are experienced in working with multiple jurisdictions and adjusting so that they become an extension of your staff. We utilize a comprehensive “New Client Checklist” that documents specific requirements of each community we serve. Upon selection and before commencement of services, we schedule a meeting with our new clients to review specific plan review requirements and systems used by our clients so our services can be integrated in a seamless manner.
• Should issues arise with the plan review services we have provided, our Plan Review Manager will contact City staff to make sure we fully understand the specific issue, review the plan review comment or other items in question, review the concern with our staff member, contact the project applicant if necessary to address the specific issue, reissue the plan review comment letter if needed, discuss the specific issue with our assigned team of Plans Examiners to make sure the error in question is not repeated on future projects, and follow up with City staff to explain how the issue in question was resolved. Our Plan Review Manager will take any additional steps necessary to ensure that we continue to provide services that meet or exceed your expectations.

INSPECTION SERVICES
• BPR Inspection staff shall provide combination building inspections to verify compliance with the City of Stockton Municipal Codes and the current edition of the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Parts 1 - Building Standard Administrative Code, Part 2 - Building Code Volumes 1 & 2, Part 2.5 - Residential Building Code, Part 3 - Electrical Code, Part 4 - Mechanical Code, Part 5 - Plumbing Code, Part 6 - Energy Code, Part 8 - Historical Building Code, Part 9 - Fire Code, Part 10 - Existing Building Code, Part 11 - Green Building Standards Code, and Part 12 - Reference Standards Code. Combination inspections will cover structural, fire & life safety, accessibility compliance, energy conservation, green building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical installations in residential, commercial, industrial, existing, and historical buildings. Our inspection staff will also verify that conditions of approval as delineated on the approved project plans are in place prior to approving projects
• Combination inspections will include site inspections, writing legible and understandable correction notices and field reports, inputting inspections results electronically in the City's permitting software, coordinating inspection windows with customers, and answering in-person or telephone inquiries. • BPR staff assigned to provide services to the city will be equipped with the necessary tools and equipment to perform the services as requested. BPR inspection staff performing services at City facilities or at project sites within City limits will possess photo identification badges.

Building Inspection Approach
Page #28 Attachment B 723

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
• Upon request from the City for any inspection needs, BPR staff will reach out to request a meeting to better understand the specific needs of the City, such as any OSPD3 or CASp requirements. • After understanding your specific needs, we will review staff availability and forward a resume of our proposed Inspector to the City. If necessary, an interview will be scheduled allowing City staff to learn the depth of code knowledge and personality of the proposed inspector candidate. Following a successful interview, a start date will be coordinated with the City.

The team proposed to serve the City of Stockton has experience with the processes, procedures, ordinances and permitting services necessary to provide the requested services fully and efficiently. On the following page you will find a detailed description as to how we will provide Building Plan Review, Structural Engineering Plan Review and Inspection services to the City of Stockton.

TECHNICAL PLANS EXAMINATION CAPABILITIES
BPR’s staff possesses significant technical capabilities in all areas of plans examination competency gained from years of experience providing these same services. All plans examiners are California Licensed Engineers or ICC Certified Plans Examiners with multiple years of experience providing plan review services. Our staff will conduct accelerated or project-specific, phased, plan reviews on an as-needed basis as requested by the City of Stockton.

Our plans examiners have a thorough understanding of code requirements, are able to read, understand and interpret construction documents, energy calculations, geotechnical reports, structural calculations, electrical load calculations, commissioning reports, and other associated design documents. Our plans examination staff have the ability to prepare well-written, plan review letters, communicate effectively orally and in writing and work effectively with jurisdiction staff, project design teams, contractors and permit applicants. Our plans examiners possess knowledge of the most current state adopted building standards.

Architectural
BPR’s non-structural plans examiners have provided plan review services for a vast array of projects including large residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, retail, and OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 medical office buildings. Our non-structural plans examiners have extensive experience verifying that established conditions of approvl items are properly integrated within project documents. Many of our plans examiners are CASp certified.

Completed plan review projects range from single-story, residential projects to complex high-rise buildings and numerous building additions and remodels. We are experienced and familiar with the use and application of the most current editions of the following model codes:

Page #29 Attachment B 724

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
 California Building Standards Code
(Title 24) Parts 1 through 6 and 9
 International Building Code (IBC)
 Americans with Disabilities Act
Standards for Accessible Design
 ANSI Standards
 NFPA Codes & Standards
 CA Code of Regulations (CCR) Titles 19 and 25
 Jurisdiction-Adopted Amendments or Ordinances
Structural
Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing building projects subjected to the significant seismic loads necessitated by the geographic location of the City of Stockton. Our structural engineers have reviewed all types of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, and multi-story projects including mid-rise and high-rise projects, institutional projects, industrial projects, retail buildings, schools, medical office buildings and court facilities.

Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing projects constructed with all building materials including the following:
 Wood
 Reinforced Masonry
 Heavy Timber / Timber Frame / CLT
 Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete
 Stressed Skin Panels
 Structural Steel
 Light Gauge Steel Framing
 Straw Bale
 Rammed Earth
 Insulated Concrete Forms, (ICF)
Our engineers have designed or reviewed a wide array of structural lateral force resisting systems including:
 Structural steel moment frames
 Buckling-restrained braced frames
 Eccentric braced frames
 Concentric braced frames
 Concrete moment frames
 Wood shear wall systems
 Masonry shear wall systems
 Concrete shear wall systems
 Cantilevered column systems
 Pre-stressed and post-Tensioned Concrete
 Various proprietary lateral force resisting
systems
Our structural engineers and inspectors are experienced with the provisions of most model codes including current versions of:
 CCR Title 24, Part 2, Volumes 2 & 2.5
 International Building Code (IBC)
 AISC 341, 358 and 360
 ASCE 7
 ASCE 41
 AISI Standards for Cold Formed Steel
 ANSI / AF&PA NDS for wood framing
 ACI 318
 ACI 530 / TMS 402/602
 CA Historic Building Codes
 CA Existing Building Codes
 NEHRP
Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical
BPR’s Mechanical and Electrical Engineers are well versed in the California Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical codes. We will review submitted design documents to ensure compliance to the current edition of the following codes:

Page #30 Attachment B 725

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
 California Building Code
 California Residential Code
 California Plumbing Code
 California Mechanical Code
 California Electrical Code
 Jurisdiction-adopted amendments
Specialty plan review services may be provided utilizing the most current editions of national standards including the following:
 International Building Code
 International Residential Code
 International Mechanical Code
 International Plumbing Code
 NFPA Standards 13 (automatic fire
sprinkler systems)
 NFPA Standards 20 (fire pumps)
 NFPA Standards 72 (fire alarms)
 NFPA Standards 99 (medical gases)
 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code
 NEHRP Requirements for Existing Building
Energy Compliance
Our engineers and plans examiners are up to date on all California Energy Code requirements as they relate to both new and remodel construction for all project types. Our staff have experience verifying CA Energy Code requirements for projects located within all climate zones. The Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non-Residential Buildings were established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. These standards have been updated since that time to address a multitude of building components, systems and equipment with the goal of having new and updated buildings be more energy efficient, comfortable for building occupants, and less reliant of fossil fuels.

Green Building Standards
BPR’s staff has a working knowledge of the proper incorporation of CALGreen building criteria into project designs and the resulting potential impact of these standards related to building code compliance and the environment. Our plans examiners will review project documents to verify compliance with adopted Green Building Code Standards as required by state law and local amendments and ordinances.

Access Compliance & CASp Review
All BPR CASp-certified professionals are knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possess the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. Our staff are experts in the industry, maintaining appropriate certifications demonstrating their expertise, and are experienced providing services for building departments in a seamless manner balanced and in coordination with our client’s expectations and needs. We work collaboratively with our clients to address accessibility plan review and inspection related issues as efficiently as possible.

Our plans examiners are fully trained and familiar with CA Building Code Accessibility requirements and ADA compliance requirements and are available for plan review and/or inspection services. We offer support to municipalities for compliance enforcement and/or developing transition plans. We can assist our clients in Page #31 Attachment B 726

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
researching and providing interpretations of various specific issues related to access compliance including access compliance obligation, transition plan development, construction costs and phasing, and regulation interpretations.

Conditions of Approval Reviews
BPR’s plan review staff will verify that established conditions of approvals are properly and thorouhghly integarted into the design documents prior to recommending approval to the City of Stockton. Our staff have provided these same services for multiple clients and will coordinate directly with the City to insure conditions of approval are properly applied in the manner intended.

Flood Zones
BPR’s staff of engineers and plans examiners have experience in providing plan reviews for projects located in FEMA designated flood zones and areas prone to flooding. BPR Consulting Group’s staff has provided numerous plan reviews for projects located in flood zones using FEMA’s Technical Bulletins as well as locally adopted ordinances. Additionally, members of our team have participated in state-sponsored committees to establish guideline and building code requirements for projects planned in areas designated as flood zones.

OSHPD 2, 3 & 5
BPR Consulting Group’s staff of plans examiners and building inspectors have extensive experience providing plan review and inspection services for OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 projects. Our staff is well versed with the OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 requirements included in the California Building Code. Our inspection staff has recent experience providing inspection services for hemodialysis, outpatient surgery, hyperbolic chamber, medical clinics and acute psychiatric facilities.

LEED
If requested we have LEED certified professionals on staff. Developed by the US Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED provides building owners and operators a framework for identifying and implementing measurable green building design methodologies, construction, operations, and building maintenance. LEED certification consists of a variety of rating systems applicable to multiple building types including commercial as well as residential. Ratings reflect a measure of how well a building performs across many sustainability metrics including: energy savings, water efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction, indoor environmental quality, energy usage and the projects impact on the local environment.

Fire Code Plan Reviews
If requested we have an experienced and licensed professional Fire Protection Engineer on staff to address your fire and life safety needs. If requested, our fire safety plan review and inspection staff can quickly and accurately check plans for compliance with applicable fire codes and standards. Our fire protection staff routinely review and inspect projects for compliance with fire and life safety regulations.

Page #32 Attachment B 727

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Our Fire Plans Examiners and Inspectors have extensive experience in the use and application of the following model codes, standards, and regulations:
 California Fire Code (CFC) and California Building Code (CBC), with local amendments and regulations.  Adopted National Fire Protection Standards
 California Health and Safety Code
 Appropriate listings (CSFM, U.L., etc.) for common systems and materials  Fire Department Standards
 Municipal, State or Federal regulations enforced by local Fire Agencies  NFPA Standards 13 (automatic fire sprinkler systems
 NFPA Standards 14 (standpipes)
 NFPA Standards 20 (fire pumps)
 NFPA Standards 72 (fire alarms)
 NFPA Standards 96 (smoke control)
 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code
BPR’s staff is active with California Fire Prevention Officer’s Association, as well as local chapters of International Code Council Building Officials Organizations throughout the State of California.

Transporting Plans
For paper submittal documents, we will arrange for all pick-up and delivery of the plan review documents from your office at no additional cost. We utilize specific methods for project document pick-up and delivery with the goal of providing same-day service.

Electronic Plan Review
BPR Consulting Group has provided electronic plan review services, serving building departments and other public agencies with efficient electronic plan review services. We are prepared to provide electronic plan check services for your community utilizing Bluebeam electronic plan review system. We understand the City will transmit all plans anc corresponding project documentation to BPR for review and approval utilizing Bluebeam Revu. Our team has extensive experience utilizing this software and have worked with multiple clients to purchase and deploy Bluebeam software, develop jurisdiction-specific stamps, develop tools to increase efficiencies for electronic plan reviews, and participate and provide ongoing training on the use of the software.

Communicating Plan Review Results
Plan review comments, when necessary, will be type written and refer to specific details, drawing or supporting document, and reference applicable code sections. BPR will provide a clear, concise, and thorough plan review letter itemized by specific discipline such as life safety, accessibility, structural, plumbing, mechanical, etc., that can be utilized by clients, designers, contractors, and owners to understand the noted deficiencies and make necessary corrections to the project documents. At the completion of each plan review cycle, BPR Consulting Group will return a copy of the plan review comment list to the designated applicant and project representative.

If requested, we will coordinate plan review re-checks directly with the designated project applicant. Upon completion of the plan review process, we will return completed plan review documents, in either hard copy or electronic format as needed, bearing BPR’s plan review stamps and ready for final approval and permit issuance by the jurisdiction.

Page #33 Attachment B 728

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
Standard Plan Review Completion Timeframes
We complete all plan reviews within the timeframes shown below for both commercial and residential projects as our standard business practice. We will accommodate any turnaround schedule agreed to with our clients.

We can provide expedited plan review services when requested.

On-Site Consultant Services & Meeting Attendance
Our plan review staff is available for pre-construction or pre-design meetings, field visits, contacts with the design team, and support for field inspection personnel as needed. We understand, fully grasp, and utilize the efficiency afforded by the many electronic meeting platforms that have become available in recent years. We find electronic meeting platforms such as Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and others allow for efficient and constructive communication between parties located throughout the United States and are an efficient tool for resolution of challenging issues both during plan review and field inspections. Our staff is available to meet with the City, project applicants and their design teams either in person or via electronic platform to resolve plan review issues efficiently and collaboratively.

Customer Service | Responsiveness
BPR’s staff is always available and willing to discuss plan review issues for projects that we have reviewed with Building Division staff, applicants, designers and contractors via in-person or electronic meetings, telephone, or e-mail as required to resolve plan review related issues. We maintain Microsoft Teams, Zoom and GoToMeeting accounts to foster efficient communication with project proponents regardless of their physical location. Voice mails and e-mails will be responded to the same day they are received, if possible, always within 24 hours.

BPR’s staff when not available immediately, will respond within one business day to questions from the Building Official or inspection staff which may be generated during field inspections of projects which were reviewed by BPR staff.

Project Type
Maximum Turn Around Time
(Business Days)
Initial Submittal Backcheck Reviews
Residential (Single Family)
New Construction 10 5
Addition 10 5
Remodel 10 5
Non-Residential
New Construction 10 5
Addition 10 5
Remodel, Tenant Improvement 10 5
Large, Complex Commercial or
Residential Multi-Family Projects 14 7
Page #34 Attachment B 729

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR

INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR maintains the staffing and ability to provide experienced and qualified building inspectors who are appropriately ICC-certified to provide the requested inspection services.

Our inspection staff will perform inspection services to verify that the work of construction is in conformance with approved project plans as well as identifying issues of non-compliance with applicable building codes. Our field inspection services will include inspection of all portions of projects including project sites as applicable. Our building inspectors will write legible and understandable correction notices, field reports and will be available to answer in-person, emailed, or telephone inquiries. All inspection personnel assigned will be ICC and/or CASp certified as required.

We understand that many municipalities have amended code sections, policies and ordinances that impact the work that is inspected and shown on approved project plans. Our inspection staff will familiarize themselves with local requirements to ensure that the projects we are inspecting are compliant with local and current code requirements. Specifically, our inspectors will ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of the Title 24 California Building Standards Code, Parts 1 through 12, covering structural, fire prevention, life safety, disabled access, energy conservation, green building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical installations in residential, commercial, industrial, existing and historical buildings.

BPR’s ICC/CASp certified inspectors have performed building inspection services on a wide variety of construction projects including master planned developments, single-family production, custom homes, commercial, manufacturing, institutional, assembly, essential service, industrial projects and historically designated buildings. When necessary for large or fast-paced projects, multiple inspectors can be made available. BPR’s inspectors will inspect projects to verify conformance with approved project drawings and specifications which will include review of the permit documents to verify that onsite conditions are consistent with the approved documents for size, setbacks, heights and other applicable requirements. At the completion of inspections, BPR’s inspectors will update database information and complete necessary forms and documents as required to provide seamless service. BPR will provide building and fire safety field inspectors as soon as possible but always within five (5) business days after receiving the request for inspection staff from the County of Yuba. We understand the County reserves the right to accept proposed inspection staff.

Inspector Qualifications & Certifications
BPR will work with the City of Stockton to select appropriately qualified inspectors with applicable experience and specific code knowledge based on the types of projects assigned for inspection. All BPR inspectors are ICCcertified, with many maintaining CASp certification. In addition, BPR employs OSHPD certified inspectors available for inspection of OSHPD designated facilities. Qualified inspectors having experience with inspection of new, existing and historical buildings/sites, building code enforcement, and building inspections for projects with steep slope grading requirements, will be assigned as appropriate.

Inspection personnel will have the ability to read, understand and interpret construction plans, truss drawings Rewriting and to work effectively with contractors, permit applicants, homeowners and agency staff. Inspectors Page #35 Attachment B 730

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
will possess knowledge of approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety used in building inspection and the most current building and fire standards. Our inspectors are familiar with most of the common scheduling and tracking systems utilized by building departments and can quickly adapt to your systems and requirements.

PERMIT TECHNICIAN AND OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES
As an added service, we have the ability to provid the City with experienced and ICC certified permit technicians. We understand that knowledgeable and personable permit technicians are the first impression the public gets of your Building Division, and they play a critical role as to how your departments services are perceived. Permit technician and office support services are crucial to the success of the entire building safety workflow within building departments. The ability to convey proper information to permit applicants, properly calculate permit fees, properly route plans to various departments for review, tracking approvals, database management and permit issuance are all critical to the success of your building department. We understand that the ability to deliver excellent customer service, maintain a smooth flow of permit documents throughout departments, and maintaining accurate and up-to-date records, are all key elements to furnishing first-rate, efficient success of your Building Division.

Our Permit Technicians and office support staff will greet and work closely with customers at the public counter or via telephone, answering questions and providing accurate information. Our Permit Technicians will provide information about permit applications, plan review and inspection requirements, will be organized and have the ability to maintain filing systems necessary for tracking permit applications, permits issued, plan checks in progress, approved project documents and any other records or information important to the efficient operation of your department.

Page #36 Attachment B 731

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR
SECTION 4.7

PROPOSAL FEE
As requested in the RFP, BPR’s proposal fee has been submitted separately in a sealed envelope.

Page #37 Attachment B 732

CITY OF STOCKTON
PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES – RFP PUR-22-001
BPR

APPENDIX
Key Staff Resumes
Page #38 Attachment B 733
BPR

EDUCATION
 Graduate Coursework in Structural &
Geotechnical Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Chico
 AA, Physical Science, Butte College,
Oroville, CA

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-3632
 CA Civil Engineer CE-39404
 NV Structural Engineer
SE-019992
 NV Civil Engineer CE-019992
 National Earthquake Hazard
Reduction Program Training
 CA Construction Law Training
International Code Council - 801789
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Building Inspector

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 San Joaquin ICC Chapter of Building
Officials – Past President
 Napa Solano ICC Chapter – Past
President
 Sacramento Valley Association of
Building Officials – Multiple Term
Board of Directors Member
 CALBO Building and Fire Advisory
Committee – Appointed Member
 CALBO Structural Committee –
Appointed Member

RON BEEHLER, SE, CBO

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE / STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Ron utilizes experience gained through more than 35 years of hands-on experience performing life safety, accessibility, and structural plan reviews to successfully manage building departments, building department services and high-profile building projects on behalf of public agencies throughout California. His experience includes establishing and coordinating on-site building department services for large, multi-building projects and unique, fast-paced development projects. Ron has served as Chief Building Official for multiple California public agencies including interim assignments. He has also provided building department assessments on behalf of municipal clients to identify inefficiencies and implement best practice improvements.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal | Director of Operations | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Ron manages client plan review and inspection services on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

City Council and Concurrent AuthoritiesMay 24, 2022

City Council and Concurrent Authorities
May 24, 2022