City Council and Concurrent Authorities
May 23, 2023

Figure 1 - Proposed Remediation Measures
ATTACHMENT E 1585

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
March 7, 2023

The proposed new flood control measures within the LSJRP include the following:
 New levee
 New closure structure
The proposed remediation measures for the existing levees within the LSJRP include the following:
 Seepage cutoff wall
 Levee reshaping
 Seismic fix
 Levee raising
 Erosion protection
Long-term levee subsidence mitigation was also considered in evaluating the O&M costs. For the purposes of this Technical Memorandum, the evaluation of O&M costs attributed to the new closure structures at Smith Canal and Fourteenmile Slough was not performed. A breakdown of the proposed remediation measures on a levee reach-by-reach basis is summarized below in Table 1. A more detailed breakdown in included in Exhibit 1.

Table 1 - Summary of Proposed Remediation Measures
Proposed Remediation Measure (1)
Levee
Reach
New
Levee
Seepage
Cutoff
Wall
Levee
Reshaping
Seismic
Fix
Levee
Raising
Erosion
Protection
Subsidence
Mitigation
Levee
Length
(miles)
Mosher Slough (left bank) 1.96
MC_10_L x x x 1.22
MC_20_L x x x 0.74
Shima Tract (right bank) 1.25
ST_10_R x x x 0.47
ST_20_R x x x 0.78
Fivemile Slough (right bank) 0.31
FS_10_R x x x 0.31
Fourteenmile Slough (left bank) 1.89
FM_60_L x x x x 0.31
FM_40_L x x x x 0.27
FM_30_L x x x x 1.31
Tenmile Slough (left bank) 2.08
TS_30_L x x x x 1.14
TS_20_L x x x x 0.27
TS_10_L x x x 0.68
Calaveras River (right bank) 4.29
CR_10_R x x 0.42
CR_20_R x x 0.26
CR_30_R x x 0.71
CR_40_R x x 0.54
CR_50_R x x 1.22
CR_60_R x x 0.25
CR_70_R x x 0.30
CR_80_R x x 0.59
ATTACHMENT E 1586

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
March 7, 2023

Proposed Remediation Measure (1)
Levee
Reach
New
Levee
Seepage
Cutoff
Wall
Levee
Reshaping
Seismic
Fix
Levee
Raising
Erosion
Protection
Subsidence
Mitigation
Levee
Length
(miles)
Calaveras River (left bank) 4.09
CR_10_L x x 0.33
CR_20_L x x 0.90
CR_30_L x x 0.49
CR_40_L x x x 1.20
CR_50_L x x 0.32
CR_60_L x x 0.27
CR_70_L x x 0.58
San Joaquin River (right bank) 3.90
SJR_10_R x x x 0.53
SJR_20_R x x x 0.42
SJR_30_R x x x 0.65
SJR_40_R x x 0.79
SJR_50_R x x 0.33
SJR_60_R x x 0.43
SJR_70_R x x 0.75
French Camp Slough (right bank) 1.84
FCS_10_R x x 1.84
Duck Creek (right bank) 0.84
DC_10_R x x 0.15
DC_20_R x x x 0.43
DC_30_R x x x 0.27
Totals: 2.01 21.51 3.94 0.94 3.48 4.86 22.45 22.45
Notes:
(1) The evaluation of O&M costs attributed to the new closure structures at Smith Canal and Fourteenmile Slough is not included in this summary.

It should be noted that the project understanding and basis of evaluation as described above are based on the LSJRP as is currently authorized by USACE. However, as the planning and engineering processes advance, further refinement of the LSJRP elements and final design configurations may differ from what is shown in the Recommended Plan within the USACE Report. For the purpose of estimating incremental O&M costs, it has been assumed that future design refinements would likely result in reduced O&M as compared to the authorized LSJRP. Therefore, the basis of estimating incremental O&M costs described in this technical memorandum has been determined to be an appropriate, conservative approach.

A list of the major assumptions utilized in this evaluation are summarized below in Table 2.

ATTACHMENT E 1587

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
March 7, 2023

Table 2 - Major Assumptions
Proposed
Measure Reference Assumption
New levee DWR Report
(Table 5.1)
 For an urban levee on the Lower San Joaquin River / Delta South, the operations and maintenance costs are $50,000 per levee mile, and the repair, replace, and rehabilitate costs are $18,000 per levee mile in 2017$.

Seepage
cutoff wall
USACE Report
(Section 8.1.3)
 “Cutoff wall(s) will not change long-term maintenance or replacement costs.”
Levee
reshaping
USACE Report
(Section 8.1.3)
 “Right-of-way will be increased; so maintenance costs will increase to cover a larger vegetation management footprint.”  Modifying the existing levee geometry, such as widening the levee crown and flattening the levee slopes to increase stability, will increase the vegetation management footprint.

Seismic fix USACE Report
(Section 8.1.3)
 “Right-of-way will be increased; so maintenance costs will increase to cover a larger vegetation management footprint.”  Degrading a portion of the existing levee, constructing a grid of deep soil mixing columns, and constructing a stability berm at the landside levee toe will increase the vegetation management footprint.

Levee
raising
USACE Report
(Section 8.1.3)
 “Right-of-way will be increased; so maintenance costs will increase to cover a larger vegetation management footprint.”  Extending the landside levee toe landward to support raising the levee crown will increase the vegetation management footprint.

Erosion
protection
n/a  Furnish and place 25 tons of supplemental RSP per levee mile per year.

Subsidence
mitigation
n/a  Furnish and place engineered levee fill and aggregate base on the levee crown periodically to maintain the minimum top of levee elevation over time.

Where necessary, costs have been escalated to 2023 dollars based on the Construction Cost Index (CCI) published monthly by Engineering News-Record (ENR). The CCI is an indicator of general construction costs and includes labor and materials components. ENR uses the CCI to measure how much it costs to purchase a hypothetical package of goods and services and compare it to what it was in a prior year.

A breakdown of the present-day unit costs used in this evaluation is included in Exhibit 2.

4. Approach
The approach for each of the proposed measures is described below in further detail.

4.1 New Levees
Pursuant to Table 5.1 of the DWR Report for an urban levee on the Lower San Joaquin River / Delta South, the operations and maintenance costs are $50,000 per levee mile, and the repair, replace, and rehabilitate costs are $18,000 per levee mile. The combined amount of $68,000 was escalated to 2023 dollars based on ENR CCIs. The CCIs that were used in this assessment are summarized below in Table 3.

ATTACHMENT E 1588

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
March 7, 2023

Table 3 - ENR CCIs and Escalation Factor for New Levee O&M Costs Comparison Data Current Data Escalation
Date ENR CCI Date ENR CCI Factor
January 2017 10,531.68 January 2023 13,175.03 1.2510
Therefore, the O&M cost attributed to a new levee in 2023 dollars was determined to be $85,067 per levee mile per year.

4.2 Seepage Cutoff Wall
Pursuant to Section 8.1.3 of the USACE Report, “Cutoff wall(s) will not change long-term maintenance or replacement costs.” Therefore, the incremental O&M cost attributed to seepage cutoff walls was determined to be zero.

4.3 Levee Reshaping, Seismic Fix, and Levee Raising
Levee reshaping, seismic fix, and levee raising remediation measures all include an element of widening the levee footprint in order to improve levee stability and/or the minimum top of levee.

Pursuant to Section 8.1.3 of the USACE Report, “Right-of-way will be increased; so maintenance costs will increase to cover a larger vegetation management footprint.” As a result, all three proposed remediation measures incorporate an increase in the levee vegetation management footprint.

Therefore, the following approach was developed to evaluate the incremental O&M costs associated with the increase to vegetation management for levee reshaping, seismic fix, and levee raising remediation measures:
 Establish a baseline annual cost attributed to only vegetation management.  Calculate a project footprint modifier that represents the percent increase in project footprint associated with the increased vegetation management.
 Calculate the incremental O&M costs associated with the increased vegetation management.

In order to establish a baseline annual cost attributed to only vegetation management, ten years of claims from the DWR Delta Levees Subventions Maintenance Program for the 28 reclamation districts in which KSN is the District Engineer were analyzed. The annual costs for “Levee Vegetation Control and Management” from Fiscal Year 2011-12 to Fiscal Year 2020-21 for each reclamation district was tallied and adjusted to 2023 dollars using ENR CCI values as per Table 4 below.

Table 4 - ENR CCIs and Escalation Factors for Baseline Vegetation O&M Costs Comparison Values Current Values Escalation
Date ENR CCI Date ENR CCI Factor
June 2011 9,290.00 January 2023 13,175.03 1.4182
June 2012 9,542.33 January 2023 13,175.03 1.3807
June 2013 9,800.38 January 2023 13,175.03 1.3443
June 2014 10,036.38 January 2023 13,175.03 1.3127
June 2015 10,337.05 January 2023 13,175.03 1.2745
June 2016 10,702.81 January 2023 13,175.03 1.2310
June 2017 11,068.35 January 2023 13,175.03 1.1903
June 2018 11,268.48 January 2023 13,175.03 1.1692
June 2019 11,436.23 January 2023 13,175.03 1.1520
June 2020 12,112.05 January 2023 13,175.03 1.0878
ATTACHMENT E 1589

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
March 7, 2023

An average annual baseline cost attributed to only vegetation management was calculated to be $3,635 per levee mile. A breakdown of the annual costs per reclamation district for said ten-year period is included in Exhibit 3.

Assumptions were made regarding the increased levee footprint width associated with levee reshaping, seismic fix, and levee raise measures. Levee widths for both pre- and post-project conditions and project footprint modifiers are summarized below in Table 5, and the basis of footprint calculations is described in Exhibit 4.

Table 5 - Increase in Project Footprint Associated with Increased Vegetation Management Remediation Measure
Pre-Project Width
(feet)
Post-Project Width
(feet)
Project Footprint
Modifier
Levee reshaping 108 164 +51.9%
Seismic fix 148 221 +49.3%
Levee raising 130 154 +18.5%
The incremental O&M costs associated with increased vegetation management were calculated by multiplying the baseline vegetation management costs (i.e., $3,655 per levee mile per year) and the project footprint multipliers shown in Table 5. Therefore, the incremental O&M costs attributed to levee reshaping, seismic fix, and levee raising in 2023 dollars were calculated and are summarized below in Table 6.

Table 6 - Incremental O&M Costs Associated with Levee Reshaping, Seismic Fix, and Levee Raising Measures Remediation Measure
Incremental O&M Cost
(per levee mile per year)
Levee reshaping $1,885
Seismic fix $1,793
Levee raising $671

4.4 Erosion Protection
Erosion protection measures were assumed to include the placement of Rock Slope Protection (RSP) consisting of 18-inch minus quarry stone riprap on the levee slope. The incremental O&M costs associated with erosion protection were calculated based on furnishing and placing a standard truck load (i.e., 25 tons) of supplemental RSP per levee mile per year. Based on a unit cost of $159 per ton of RSP, the incremental O&M cost attributed to erosion protection in 2023 dollars was determined to be $3,985 per levee mile per year.

4.5 Subsidence Mitigation
Pursuant to Section 8.1.3 of the USACE Report, “Localized ground subsidence may require periodic placement of levee fill to maintain the levee crest elevation.” The approach for evaluating the incremental O&M costs associated with subsidence mitigation was developed assuming that new engineered levee fill and aggregate base will need to be furnished and placed on the levee crown periodically to maintain the minimum top of levee elevation over time. The assumptions used in the calculations of new materials are summarized below in Table 7.

ATTACHMENT E 1590

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
March 7, 2023

Table 7 - New Materials Associated with Subsidence Mitigation Material
Width
(feet)
Thickness
(inches)
Quantity
(cubic yards per mile)
Frequency
(years)
Quantity
(tons per mile per year)
Engineered levee fill 20 6 1,956 50 70.4
Aggregate base 20 4 1,304 50 52.1
Based on a unit cost of $75 per ton of engineered levee fill and a unit cost of $90 per ton of aggregate base, the incremental O&M cost attributed to subsidence mitigation in 2023 dollars was determined to be $9,974 per levee mile per year.

5. Results
The incremental O&M unit costs associated with each of the proposed measures is summarized below in Table 8.

Table 8 - Summary of Incremental O&M Unit Costs
Remediation Measure
Incremental O&M Cost
(per levee mile per year)
New levee $85,067
Seepage cutoff wall $0
Levee reshaping $1,885
Seismic fix $1,793
Levee raising $671
Erosion protection $3,985
Subsidence mitigation $9,974
The overall incremental O&M annual cost was then calculated by multiplying the incremental O&M unit costs for each proposed measure by the levee miles for each levee reach. A breakdown of the overall incremental O&M annual cost on a levee reach-by-reach basis is summarized below in Table 9. A more detailed breakdown is included in Exhibit 5.

Table 9 - Summary of Overall Incremental O&M Annual Costs Levee Reach
Levee Length
(miles)
Incremental O&M
Annual Cost
Mosher Slough (left bank) $20,840
MC_10_L 1.22 $12,979
MC_20_L 0.74 $7,861
Shima Tract (right bank) $17,475
ST_10_R 0.47 $6,577
ST_20_R 0.78 $10,897
Fivemile Slough (right bank) $4,291
FS_10_R 0.31 $4,291
Fourteenmile Slough (left bank) $138,403
FM_60_L 0.31 $4,527
FM_40_L 0.27 $3,979
FM_30_L 1.31 $129,896
ATTACHMENT E 1591

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
March 7, 2023

Levee Reach
Levee Length
(miles)
Incremental O&M
Annual Cost
Tenmile Slough (left bank) $31,973
TS_30_L 1.14 $18,016
TS_20_L 0.27 $4,737
TS_10_L 0.68 $9,220
Calaveras River (right bank) $42,783
CR_10_R 0.42 $4,175
CR_20_R 0.26 $2,618
CR_30_R 0.71 $7,038
CR_40_R 0.54 $5,434
CR_50_R 1.22 $12,135
CR_60_R 0.25 $2,539
CR_70_R 0.30 $3,000
CR_80_R 0.59 $5,844
Calaveras River (left bank) $43,072
CR_10_L 0.33 $3,279
CR_20_L 0.90 $8,993
CR_30_L 0.49 $4,870
CR_40_L 1.20 $14,289
CR_50_L 0.32 $3,149
CR_60_L 0.27 $2,731
CR_70_L 0.58 $5,761
San Joaquin River (right bank) $40,717
SJR_10_R 0.53 $5,595
SJR_20_R 0.42 $4,460
SJR_30_R 0.65 $7,699
SJR_40_R 0.79 $7,884
SJR_50_R 0.33 $3,332
SJR_60_R 0.43 $4,301
SJR_70_R 0.75 $7,446
French Camp Slough (right bank) $18,317
FCS_10_R 1.84 $18,317
Duck Creek (right bank) $67,470
DC_10_R 0.15 $1,500
DC_20_R 0.43 $40,680
DC_30_R 0.27 $25,290
Totals: 22.45 $425,340
Notes:
(1) The evaluation of O&M costs attributed to the new closure structures at Smith Canal and Fourteenmile Slough is not included in this summary.

6. Conclusions
The overall incremental O&M annual cost attributed to the LSJRP amounts to $425,402 per year, with one exception. For the purposes of this Technical Memorandum, the evaluation of O&M costs attributed to the new closure structures at Smith Canal and Fourteenmile Slough was not performed.

ATTACHMENT E 1592
Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance Costs
Lower San Joaquin River Project
EXHIBIT 1
Proposed Remediation Measures

ATTACHMENT E 1593
LCMA District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance CostsLower San Joaquin River ProjectPROPOSED REMEDIATION MEASURES Levee Type Proposed Remediation Measure
Levee
Reach Waterway Bank Reach Description
Current
LMA(1)
Federal
Levee
Non-Fed to
Become
Fed
New Levee
to Become
Fed Levee
New
Levee
Seepage
Cutoff
Wall
Levee
Reshaping
Seismic
Fix
Levee
Raising
Erosion
Protection
New
Closure
Structure
Subsidence
Mitigation
Length
(miles)
MC_10_L Mosher Slough Left Southern levee along Mosher Slough with heavy amounts of vegatation, neighboring residential area. SJCFCWCD(2) X X X X 1.22 MC_20_L Mosher Slough Left Southern levee along Mosher Slough with heavy amounts of vegatation, neighboring residential area. SJCFCWCD X X X X 0.74 ST_10_R Shima Tract Right Dry land levee along east end of Shima Tract between agricultural land (west) and a residential area (east). SJCFCWCD X X X X 0.47 ST_20_R Shima Tract Right Dry land levee along east end of Shima Tract between agricultural land (west) and a residential area (east). SJCFCWCD X X X X 0.78FS_10_R Fivemile Slough Right Northern levee along Fivemile Slough along south end of Shima Tract with minimal amounts of vegatation, neighboring agricultural area.

RD 2115Shima Tract X X X X 0.31
FM_60_L Fourteenmile Slough Right North levee along Fourteenmile Slough along south end of Shima Tract. RD 2115 Shima Tract X X X X X 0.31FM_50_L Fourteenmile Slough Left Fourteen Mile Slough Closure Structure n/a X(3) 0.00 FM_40_L Fourteenmile Slough Left
Levee with future plan of implementing Fourteen Mile Slough Closure Structure. Levee will be implemented inland on Wright-Elmwood Tract. n/a X X X X X 0.27
FM_30_L Fourteenmile Slough Left
Western levee along Fourteenmile Slough along the east end of Wright-Elmwood Tract. Village West Marina Resort East of Fourteenmile Slough. n/a X X X X X 1.31
TS_30_L Tenmile Slough Left
Eastern levee along Tenmile Slough along the boundary between Wright-Elmwood Tract and SargenBarnhart Tract. Residential area east of levee. RD 2074 Sargent-Barnhart Tract XX X X X 1.14 TS_20_L Tenmile Slough Left Levee transitioning from Tenmile Slough. RD 2074 Sargent-Barnhart Tract X X X X X 0.27 TS_10_L Tenmile Slough Left
Eastern levee along San Joaquin River along the west end Sargent-Barnhart Tract. Residential area east of levee.

RD 2074Sargent-Barnhart Tract X X X X 0.68
CR_10_R Calaveras River Right
Northern levee along Calaveras River along the south end of Sargent-Barnhart Tract. Residential area north of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X 0.42
CR_20_R Calaveras River Right
Northern levee along Calaveras River along the south end of Sargent-Barnhart Tract. Residential area north of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X 0.26
CR_30_R Calaveras River Right
Northern levee along Calaveras River along the south end of Sargent-Barnhart Tract. Residential area north of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X 0.71
CR_40_R Calaveras River Right Northern levee along Calaveras River. Residential area north of levee. SJCFCWCD X X X 0.54CR_50_R Calaveras River Right Northern levee along Calaveras River. Residential area north of levee. SJCFCWCD X X X 1.22CR_60_R Calaveras River Right Northern levee along Calaveras River . Residential area north of levee with school facilities close to levee. SJCFCWCD X X X 0.25 CR_70_R Calaveras River Right Northern levee along Calaveras River . Residential area north of levee with church facilities close to levee. SJCFCWCD X X X 0.30 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 1 of 3 Print Date: 1/31/2023

ATTACHMENT E
1594
LCMA District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance CostsLower San Joaquin River ProjectPROPOSED REMEDIATION MEASURES Levee Type Proposed Remediation Measure
Levee
Reach Waterway Bank Reach Description
Current
LMA(1)
Federal
Levee
Non-Fed to
Become
Fed
New Levee
to Become
Fed Levee
New
Levee
Seepage
Cutoff
Wall
Levee
Reshaping
Seismic
Fix
Levee
Raising
Erosion
Protection
New
Closure
Structure
Subsidence
Mitigation
Length
(miles)
CR_80_R Calaveras River Right
Northern levee along Calaveras River. Residential area north of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X 0.59
CR_10_L Calaveras River Left
Southern levee along Calaveras River along the north end of Smith Tract. Residential area south of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X 0.33
CR_20_L Calaveras River Left
Southern levee along Calaveras River along the north end of Smith Tract. Residential area south of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X 0.90
CR_30_L Calaveras River Left
Southern levee along Calaveras River along the north end of Smith Tract. Residential area south of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X 0.49
CR_40_L Calaveras River Left
Southern levee along Calaveras River along the north end of Smith Tract. Residential area south of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X X 1.20
CR_50_L Calaveras River Left Southern levee along Calaveras River. Residential area south of levee with school facilities close to levee. SJCFCWCD X X X 0.32 CR_60_L Calaveras River Left Southern levee along Calaveras River. Residential area south of levee with school facilities close to levee. SJCFCWCD X X X 0.27CR_70_L Calaveras River Left Southern levee along Calaveras River. Residential area south of levee with residential homes close to levee.

SJCFCWCD X X X 0.58
SC_30 Smith Canal Smith Canal Closure Structure n/a X(4) 0.00 SJR_10_R San Joaquin River Right Area west of Smith Canal Gate adjacent to Stockton Golf & Country Club. RD 1614 Smith Tract X X X X 0.53 SJR_20_R San Joaquin River Right Area east of Smith Canal Gate along Dad's Point connecting to Louis Park. n/a X X X X 0.42 SJR_30_R San Joaquin River Right
Eastern levee along San Joaquin River along the west end of Boggs Tract. Port of Stockton facilities east of levee.

RD 404Boggs Tract X X X X 0.65
SJR_40_R San Joaquin River Right
Eastern levee along San Joaquin River along the west end of Boggs Tract. Port of Stockton facilities east of levee.

RD 404Boggs Tract XX X 0.79
SJR_50_R San Joaquin River Right
Eastern levee along San Joaquin River along the west end of Boggs Tract. Port of Stockton facilities east of levee.

RD 404Boggs Tract XX X 0.33
SJR_60_R San Joaquin River Right
Eastern levee along San Joaquin River along the west end of Boggs Tract. Port of Stockton facilities east of levee.

RD 404Boggs Tract XX X 0.43
SJR_70_R San Joaquin River Right
Eastern levee along San Joaquin River along the west end of Boggs Tract. Residential area east of levee with former Van Buskirk Park close to levee.

RD 404Boggs Tract XX X 0.75
FCS_10_R French Camp Slough Right
Northern levee along French Camp Slough along the south end of Boggs Tract. Residential area north of levee with former Van Buskirk Park close to levee.

RD 404Boggs Tract XX X 1.84
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 2 of 3 Print Date: 1/31/2023

ATTACHMENT E
1595
LCMA District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance CostsLower San Joaquin River ProjectPROPOSED REMEDIATION MEASURES Levee Type Proposed Remediation Measure
Levee
Reach Waterway Bank Reach Description
Current
LMA(1)
Federal
Levee
Non-Fed to
Become
Fed
New Levee
to Become
Fed Levee
New
Levee
Seepage
Cutoff
Wall
Levee
Reshaping
Seismic
Fix
Levee
Raising
Erosion
Protection
New
Closure
Structure
Subsidence
Mitigation
Length
(miles)
DC_10_R Duck Creek Right Northern levee along Duck Creek east of I-5. Commercial and residential areas north of levee. SJCFCWCD X X X 0.15DC_20_R Duck Creek Right Northern levee along Duck Creek. Commercial and residential areas north of levee. n/a X X X X 0.43DC_30_R Duck Creek Right Northern levee along Duck Creek. Commercial and residential areas north of levee. n/a X X X X 0.27 Levee Mile Totals: 12.67 7.77 2.01 2.01 21.51 3.94 0.94 3.48 4.86 0.00 22.45 22.45 Notes:
(1) LMA = Local Maintaining Agency(2) SJCFCWCD = San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District(3) For the purposes of this Technical Memorandum, the evaluation of O&M costs attributed to the new closure structure at Fourteenmile Slough was not performed (4) For the purposes of this Technical Memorandum, the evaluation of O&M costs attributed to the new closure structure at Smith Canal was not performed Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Print Date: 1/31/2023

ATTACHMENT E
1596
Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance Costs
Lower San Joaquin River Project
EXHIBIT 2
Unit Cost Calculations

ATTACHMENT E 1597
LCMA District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance Costs
Lower San Joaquin River Project

UNIT COST CALCULATIONS

ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
Construction $94,300

1. Mobilization 3% $2,700

2. Erosion Control 3% $2,700

3. Clearing and Grubbing 0.22 AC $5,000 $1,100

4. Quarry Stone Riprap 1,000 TN $70 $70,000

5. Miscellaneous 25% $17,800
Soft Costs 30% $28,300
Contingency 30% $36,800
Total Cost: $159,400
Unit Cost: $159

LEVEE FILL

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
Construction $44,500

1. Mobilization 3% $1,300

2. Erosion Control 3% $1,300

3. Clearing and Grubbing 0.69 AC $5,000 $3,500

4. Levee Fill 1,000 TN $30 $30,000

5. Miscellaneous 25% $8,400
Soft Costs 30% $13,400
Contingency 30% $17,400
Total Cost: $75,300
Unit Cost: $75

AGGREGATE BASE

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
Construction $53,000

1. Mobilization 3% $1,500

2. Erosion Control 3% $1,500

3. Aggregate Base 1,000 TN $40 $40,000

4. Miscellaneous 25% $10,000
Soft Costs 30% $15,900
Contingency 30% $20,700
Total Cost: $89,600
Unit Cost: $90
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Print Date: 1/31/2023 ATTACHMENT E 1598
Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance Costs
Lower San Joaquin River Project
EXHIBIT 3
Summary of Vegetation Management Costs
Delta Levees Subventions Maintenance Program
FY 2011-12 to FY 2020-21

ATTACHMENT E 1599
LCMA District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance CostsLower San Joaquin River ProjectSUMMARY OF VEGETATION MANAGEMENT COSTSDWR DELTA LEVEES SUBVENTIONS MAINTENANCE PROGRAMFY 2011-12 TO FY 2020-21 RD Vegetation Management Costs per Fiscal Year(1) Levee No. RD Name 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Miles 1 Union - East $74,116 $118,742 $108,702 $108,063 $84,222 $104,544 $45,335 $65,573 $61,268 $81,357 14.02 Union - West $12,224 $7,399 $38,411 $36,221 $16,123 $0 $49,939 $12,195 $27,855 $13,313 16.2 307 Lisbon $49,800 $32,010 $16,320 $18,000 $20,840 $29,107 $24,999 $25,585 $25,217 $26,803 6.6403 Rough & Ready $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $93 $0 $1,713 6.8 404 Boggs $499 $1,401 $1,746 $1,565 $1,379 $6,284 $1,733 $1,269 $1,814 $8,225 0.7 501 Ryer $25,633 $61,642 $31,432 $31,377 $32,540 $7,379 $27,212 $38,469 $31,230 $48,406 20.6524 Middle Roberts $18,800 $17,725 $54,262 $33,905 $34 $19,033 $20,860 $37,574 $22,611 $86,512 9.7544 Upper Roberts $119,393 $7,069 $0 $44,499 n.r. (2) $0 $211,413 $52,812 $46,646 $81,895 15.0 563 Tyler $66,117 $46,868 $40,013 $40,372 $63,964 $87,344 $68,675 $68,182 $49,581 $41,744 22.9773 Fabian $21,145 $22,829 $13,770 $38,572 $121,726 $16,092 $59,719 $97,485 $100,003 $83,732 18.8 800 Byron $39,401 $40,919 $35,991 $37,180 $32,522 $28,932 $52,156 $52,625 $54,139 $47,568 9.7828 Weber n.r. n.r. $0 $0 $31,022 $32,903 $14,462 $34,581 $3,711 $2,540 1.7 1601 Twitchell $36,910 $28,303 $35,388 $27,723 $22,720 $29,925 $12,806 $32,291 $38,439 $11,536 11.91608 Lincoln Village West n.r. n.r. n.r. $46,662 $15,342 $17,657 $23,424 $18,554 $71,668 $56,577 3.61614 Smith $15,713 $13,909 $0 $73 $324 $0 $0 $0 $1,894 $1,844 2.8 2023 Venice $20,975 $42,138 $52,695 $7,577 $1,674 $24,653 $23,577 $21,132 $57,944 $39,065 12.32027 Mandeville $30,290 $24,262 $18,990 $34,370 n.r. $32,836 $46,170 $38,847 $30,548 $32,854 14.3 2030 McDonald $13,132 $27,269 $18,468 $35,712 $59,194 $51,898 $34,906 $45,349 $28,870 $74,148 13.7 2040 Victoria $20,204 $52,456 $129,191 $61,294 $19,596 $20,002 $9,781 $46,446 $21,470 $13,412 15.12042 Bishop $18,770 $25,335 $16,404 $0 $12,823 $29,175 $17,632 $55,709 $56,888 $82,489 7.82089 Stark $11,275 $18,250 $6,850 $7,450 $31,925 $503 $8,167 $320 $41 $1,073 3.52090 Quimby $35,232 $30,419 $8,020 $19,821 n.r. $438 n.r. n.r. n.r. n.r. 7.02111 Dead Horse $0 $0 n.r. n.r. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2.6 2113 Fay $32,478 $32,725 $10,982 $8,712 $7,988 $8,245 $7,740 $12,426 $18,633 $48,533 1.62115 Shima $0 n.r. n.r. n.r. $0 $381 $0 $0 $0 $0 6.6 2117 Coney n.r. n.r. n.r. n.r. n.r. $0 $8,164 $20,558 $37,892 $14,259 5.42119 Wright-Elmwood $8,350 $16,642 $23,401 $20,886 $15,501 $21,982 $22,130 $10,243 $26,970 $16,938 7.1 2126 Atlas $7,170 $300 $16,769 $34 $9,344 $6,497 $11,086 $8,687 $30,504 $14,132 3.0 Subtotal Cost (cost year varies)(3): $677,629 $668,611 $677,804 $660,068 $600,802 $575,811 $802,085 $797,005 $845,834 $930,667 261.0 ENR CCI (cost year varies): 9,290.00 9,542.33 9,800.38 10,036.38 10,337.05 10,702.81 11,068.35 11,268.48 11,436.23 12,112.05ENR CCI (Jan 2023): 13,175.03 13,175.03 13,175.03 13,175.03 13,175.03 13,175.03 13,175.03 13,175.03 13,175.03 13,175.03Escalation Factor: 1.4182 1.3807 1.3443 1.3127 1.2745 1.2310 1.1903 1.1692 1.1520 1.0878 Total Cost (2023$)(4): $961,009 $923,147 $911,198 $866,490 $765,749 $708,817 $954,748 $931,853 $974,437 $1,012,344 261.0 Cost per Levee Mile (2023$): $3,839 $3,788 $3,753 $3,517 $3,492 $2,716 $3,759 $3,669 $3,836 $3,986Average (2023$): $3,635 per levee mile per year Notes:
(1) Annual costs were derived from the "Levee Vegetation Control and Management" costs as shown in the final claims from 28 reclamation districts within the Delta through the DWR Delta Levees Subventions Maintenance Program.(2) n.r. = not recorded. Not all records were available for all reclamation districts and all years.(3) Subtotal costs are based on dollars specific to each fiscal year shown and have not been escalated.(4) Total costs have been escalated to 2023 dollars using ENR-published Construction Cost Indecies (CCIs).

Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Print Date: 1/31/2023

ATTACHMENT E
1600
Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance Costs
Lower San Joaquin River Project
EXHIBIT 4
Basis of Levee Footprint Calculations

ATTACHMENT E 1601
73' 128'
20' 20'
18'
9'
10'
3:1
3:13:1
3:1

FINISH GRADE

EXISTING GROUND

SEISMIC FIX
FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS:

PRE-CONSTRUCTION WIDTH: 128 FEET + 20 FEET LANDSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY = 148 FEET POST-CONSTRUCTION WIDTH: 128 FEET + 73 FEET + 20 FEET LANDSIDE RIGHT-OF WAY = 221 FEET DIFFERENCE: +49.3%
DWSE

DEEP SOIL MIXING COLUMNS (TYP)

LEVEE RAISE
FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS:

PRE-CONSTRUCTION WIDTH: 110 FEET + 20 FEET LANDSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY = 130 FEET POST-CONSTRUCTION WIDTH: 110 FEET + 24 FEET + 20 FEET LANDSIDE RIGHT-OF WAY = 154 FEET DIFFERENCE: +18.5%
24' 110'
15'
19'
20'
3:1
3:1

LEVEE RESHAPING
FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS:

PRE-CONSTRUCTION WIDTH: 88 FEET + 20 FEET LANDSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY = 108 FEET POST-CONSTRUCTION WIDTH: 88 FEET + 56 FEET + 20 FEET LANDSIDE RIGHT-OF WAY = 164 FEET DIFFERENCE: +51.9%
56' 88'
20' 16'
19' 18'
3:1
3:1
2:1
2:1
DWSE
DWSE

EXISTING GROUND

EXISTING GROUND

FINISH GRADE
3:1

FINISH GRADE
FILE SPEC:PLOT DATE:

EXHIBIT NO.

PAGE NO.

DRAWING SCALE
0 ¼"
ORIG. DRAWING SCALE
½"
711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA 95203
209-946-0268
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA 95691
www.ksninc.com 916-403-5900

SJAFCA / SJCFCWCD
ZONE 9 OVERLAY ASSESSMENT

LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER PROJECT O&M

BASIS OF FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS
N.T.S. 1
1 ATTACHMENT E 1602
Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance Costs
Lower San Joaquin River Project
EXHIBIT 5
Overall Incremental O&M Annual Costs
ATTACHMENT E 1603
LCMA District
Incremental Operations and Maintenance CostsLower San Joaquin River ProjectOVERALL INCREMENTAL O&M ANNUAL COSTS Incremental O&M Annual Cost per Proposed Remediation Measure Total Levee Reach Waterway Bank
Length
(miles)
New
Levee
Seepage
Cutoff Wall
Levee
Reshaping
Seismic
Fix
Levee
Raising
Erosion
Protection
New Closure
Structure
Subsidence
Mitigation
Incremental O&M
Annual Cost
MC_10_L Mosher Slough Left 1.22 $0 $0 $0 $0 $818 $0 $0 $12,161 $12,979MC_20_L Mosher Slough Left 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $496 $0 $0 $7,365 $7,861 ST_10_R Shima Tract Right 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,878 $0 $4,700 $6,577 ST_20_R Shima Tract Right 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,111 $0 $7,786 $10,897 FS_10_R Fivemile Slough Right 0.31 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,225 $0 $3,066 $4,291 FM_60_L Fourteenmile Slough Right 0.31 $0 $0 $0 $0 $208 $1,233 $0 $3,087 $4,527FM_50_L Fourteenmile Slough Left 0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0(1) $0 $0(1) FM_40_L Fourteenmile Slough Left 0.27 $0 $0 $0 $0 $183 $1,084 $0 $2,713 $3,979 FM_30_L Fourteenmile Slough Left 1.31 $111,586 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,227 $0 $13,083 $129,896 TS_30_L Tenmile Slough Left 1.14 $0 $0 $2,144 $0 $0 $4,531 $0 $11,341 $18,016TS_20_L Tenmile Slough Left 0.27 $0 $0 $506 $482 $0 $1,070 $0 $2,679 $4,737 TS_10_L Tenmile Slough Left 0.68 $0 $0 $1,273 $1,211 $0 $0 $0 $6,736 $9,220CR_10_R Calaveras River Right 0.42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,175 $4,175 CR_20_R Calaveras River Right 0.26 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,618 $2,618 CR_30_R Calaveras River Right 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,038 $7,038 CR_40_R Calaveras River Right 0.54 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,434 $5,434 CR_50_R Calaveras River Right 1.22 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,135 $12,135 CR_60_R Calaveras River Right 0.25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,539 $2,539 CR_70_R Calaveras River Right 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $3,000 CR_80_R Calaveras River Right 0.59 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,844 $5,844 CR_10_L Calaveras River Left 0.33 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,279 $3,279 CR_20_L Calaveras River Left 0.90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,993 $8,993 CR_30_L Calaveras River Left 0.49 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,870 $4,870 CR_40_L Calaveras River Left 1.20 $0 $0 $2,271 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,017 $14,289 CR_50_L Calaveras River Left 0.32 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,149 $3,149 CR_60_L Calaveras River Left 0.27 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,731 $2,731 CR_70_L Calaveras River Left 0.58 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,761 $5,761 SC_30 Smith Canal 0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0(2) $0 $0(2) SJR_10_R San Joaquin River Right 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $353 $0 $0 $5,242 $5,595 SJR_20_R San Joaquin River Right 0.42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $281 $0 $0 $4,178 $4,460 SJR_30_R San Joaquin River Right 0.65 $0 $0 $1,224 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,475 $7,699 SJR_40_R San Joaquin River Right 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,884 $7,884SJR_50_R San Joaquin River Right 0.33 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,332 $3,332SJR_60_R San Joaquin River Right 0.43 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,301 $4,301SJR_70_R San Joaquin River Right 0.75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,446 $7,446FCS_10_R French Camp Slough Right 1.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,317 $18,317 DC_10_R Duck Creek Right 0.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500 $1,500 DC_20_R Duck Creek Right 0.43 $36,411 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,269 $40,680 DC_30_R Duck Creek Right 0.27 $22,636 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,654 $25,290 Totals: 22.45 $170,634 $0 $7,418 $1,693 $2,338 $19,360 $0 $223,898 $425,340 Notes:
(1) For the purposes of this Technical Memorandum, the evaluation of O&M costs attributed to the new closure structure at Fourteenmile Slough was not performed (2) For the purposes of this Technical Memorandum, the evaluation of O&M costs attributed to the new closure structure at Smith Canal was not performed Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Print Date: 1/31/2023

ATTACHMENT E
1604
San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
Levee Construction and
Maintenance Assessment
(LCMA)
Appendix B
LCMA Cash Flow and Financing Analysis
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Date: March 16, 2023
ATTACHMENT E 1605
Appendix B
Levee Capital and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)Cash Flow and Financing Plan Analysis ($1,000's) Total 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 N/C Stockton Flood Program ‐ Beginning Balance [1] 2,218 1,904 5,359 7,468 9,285 7,581 5,905 5,643 4,101 3,447 5,499 4,967 13,968 7,521 8,975 6,949 5,878 62,927 38,095 20,763 19,259 12,595 5,871 ‐594 ‐337 519 1,578 3,245 LSJRP ‐ USACE Authorized Program Expenditures
Funding Implementation Costs 00000000000000000000000000000SJAFCA Net Contribution Required [2] 119,750 134 1,507 452 1,038 4,680 4,696 3,417 4,730 3,610 960 3,692 4,175 9,025 1,278 4,913 4,120 6,164 23,991 16,663 1,012 6,352 6,597 6,528 00000 Operational Soft Costs [3] 24,270 180 450 800 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 600 600 200 200 Operations and Maintenance
Incremental O&M for LSJRP 36,165 0 90 374 383 415 526 552 682 1,081 1,196 1,225 1,388 1,467 1,502 1,539 1,576 1,614 1,653 1,693 1,734 1,776 1,819 1,863 1,909 1,955 2,002 2,051 2,100 Smith Canal Gate [4]
SCAAD Assessment Revenue Bond Redemption 24,498 0 24,498 00000000000000000000000000 Total Expenditures 204,683 314 26,544 1,626 2,421 6,094 6,221 4,969 6,412 5,691 3,157 5,917 6,563 11,492 3,780 7,452 6,696 8,778 26,644 19,357 3,746 9,129 9,417 9,392 2,909 2,555 2,602 2,251 2,300 State Sources
State TBD for N‐C Stockton Additional Flood Program 00000000000000000000000000000 Local Sources
Proposed LCMA Assessment Net Revenues for Capital Services [4] 220,274 0 0 6,200 6,349 6,501 6,657 6,817 6,981 7,148 7,320 7,495 7,675 7,859 8,048 8,241 8,439 8,642 8,849 9,061 9,279 9,501 9,730 9,963 10,202 10,447 10,698 10,954 11,217 Total LSJR Revenues 220,274 0 0 6,200 6,349 6,501 6,657 6,817 6,981 7,148 7,320 7,495 7,675 7,859 8,048 8,241 8,439 8,642 8,849 9,061 9,279 9,501 9,730 9,963 10,202 10,447 10,698 10,954 11,217 Program Financing: Assessment District Borrowing
Proceeds from Bond Issuance [5] 100,000 0 30,000 000000000 10,000 0000 60,000 00000000000 Debt Service Costs [6] ‐112,939 0 0 ‐2,466 ‐2,111 ‐2,111 ‐2,111 ‐2,111 ‐2,111 ‐2,111 ‐2,111 ‐2,111 ‐2,111 ‐2,814 ‐2,814 ‐2,814 ‐2,814 ‐2,814 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 ‐7,037 N/C Stockton Program ‐ Preliminary Ending Balance 1,904 5,359 7,468 9,285 7,581 5,905 5,643 4,101 3,447 5,499 4,967 13,968 7,521 8,975 6,949 5,878 62,927 38,095 20,763 19,259 12,595 5,871 ‐594 ‐337 519 1,578 3,245 5,125 [1] Beginning balance in 2022 is based on annual FY 2022/23 budget adopted by SJAFCA[6] Assumes three Bond Issues in 2023, 2033, 2038, that generate net proceeds of $30M, $10M, and $60M, respectively.[7] Assumes level debt service for all bond issuances.

Source Model: 1820000_2023 0123_N‐C_Stockton_LSJRP_Financing_Model [2] Combination of cash, LERRDs contribution net of funding provided (cash to USACE under DA totals $666,192.46 thru 4/30/2021), and expected credit (e.g. Smith Canal Gate); LERRDs split at NFS cost share amounts; Internal SJAFCA cost, G&A, and consultant costs are credit not accounted for as part of this line item but the upfront cash requirement is captured under "Operational Soft Costs" [3] Soft costs include SJAFCA staff and consultants (e.g. CEQA, project management, technical review and assistance) for costs not likely to be creditable to the Federal Project; Assume 4 FTEs at peak and tapers following project completion; Assume no assessment administration which would be captured in the LCMA budget; Assumes no long‐term G&A costs. [4] Annual escalation assumed at 2.4% (consistent with the authorized escalation described in the Engineer's Report.) [5] Assumes SJAFCA will issue new debt secured by LCMA revenues to redeem outstanding SCAAD series 2019 bonds.

Prepared by LWA 1808000 LCMA ER Tables 2023.02.27.xlsx

ATTACHMENT E
1606
San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
Levee Construction and
Maintenance Assessment
(LCMA)
Appendix C
LCMA Floodplain Analysis, March 16, 2023
(Prepared by R&F Engineering)
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Date: March 16, 2023
ATTACHMENT E 1607
Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)
Floodplain Analysis
Prepared for: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Date: March 16, 2023
Prepared by: Brittney O’Connell, PE and Baron Creager, PE Reviewed by: Mike Rossiter, PE
Introduction
The San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency (SJAFCA) is advancing a combined assessment district, known as the Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA) District, to fund the (1) additional Operations & Maintenance (O&M) needs of the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 9 (Zone 9) maintained project levees and (2) the local cost share component associated with the flood risk reduction measures being implemented as part of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Lower San Joaquin River Project (LSJRP).

As part of the assessment district formation process, R&F Engineering Inc. (R&F) was retained by Larsen Wurzel & Associates (LWA) to assist with floodplain analyses to inform the proportionate level of special benefit that each parcel within the proposed assessment will receive from the activities being funded by LCMA.

The floodplain analysis will be used to identify: which parcels would potentially be flooded from a breach on a LSJRP levee or a Zone 9-maintained project levee, to what extent would the parcel be flooded, what flood depths would the parcel experience, and how many levee miles is each parcel relying on to protect it from flooding.

This Technical Memorandum (TM) outlines the data sources and methodology of R&F’s floodplain analyses. Throughout the TM, the O&M of Zone 9 project levees will be referred to as the “O&M services” and the work being completed as part of the USACE LSJRP will be referred to as “capital improvements”.

ATTACHMENT E 1608
Technical Memorandum
LCMA Floodplain Analysis 2 March 16, 2023
Baseline Data
To the extent available, existing analyses were used to estimate the floodplain depths and extents for this effort. The following subsections summarize the data sources that were used for the floodplain analyses as part of defining the benefit areas for the O&M services and the capital improvements.

O&M Services
The floodplains for the O&M analysis originated from two sources: the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Central Valley Floodplain Evaluation and Delineation (CVFED) Task Order (TO) 306 analysis1 and the Peterson Brustad Inc. (PBI) floodplain analysis2.

As part of DWR’s TO306 work, a hydraulic model was developed and various levee breach scenarios were analyzed. The model and levee breach scenarios covers a large portion of the SJAFCA LCMA study area. The primary resources used for this DWR analyses include:
• DWR Central Valley Floodplain evaluation and Delineation (CVFED) TO306 FLO2D model • DWR’s CVFED TO24 and HEC-RAS v4.1 model3
• United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study (LSJRFS)4 hydrologic analysis
For the portion of the LCMA study area that was not covered by the CVFED analyses, PBI developed a 1D/2D HEC-RAS 5.0 model from the DWR CVFED HEC-RAS 4.1 model to perform additional levee breach scenarios.

PBI breach parameters were set to match the parameters used in the CVFED analyses. Breach formation time was set to be instant, breach width set to be equal to 50 times the levee height, and breaches were set to erode to the elevation of the landside toe of the levee. The 1D reaches from the DWR HEC-RAS 4.1 model were not altered when updating to the 1D/2D HECRAS 5.0 model. The modifications to the model included converting overbank areas to a 2D mesh using the following steps:
• Importing DWR’s 1-meter resolution CVFED LiDAR ground elevation data5into the model
• Converting 1D storage areas to 2D gridded flow areas at 250ft x 250ft resolution 1 DWR. CVFED TO 306: Technical Memorandum- Hydraulic Analysis for 200-Year Floodplain Inundation Data in Technical Support of Local Communities, prepared by HDR, Inc., December 2014. 2 PBI. FloodCALM Assessment District Floodplain Analysis. August 2019. 3 DWR. CVFED Program for the Lower San Joaquin River: Task Orders 24 and 25, Technical Memorandum Lower San Joaquin River System HEC-RAS Model Development, Prepared by HDR, Inc., February 2010. 4 USACE Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study F3 Hydrology Appendix, prepared by PBI, July 2012. 5 HDR Engineering, Inc. CVFED LiDAR Data, Task Order 20, “Secondary LiDAR Post Processing in Support of Hydraulic Model Development”, June 2010.

ATTACHMENT E 1609
Technical Memorandum
LCMA Floodplain Analysis 3 March 16, 2023
• Assigning Manning’s n values for the overland 2D areas based on land use type. San Joaquin County zoning GIS data6 was used to identify land use types in the floodplain.

Guidance from the DWR CVFED FLO2D analysis was used in assigning n-values to the various land use types.

Figure 1 shows the extents of the CVFED and PBI modeling that was used to support the O&M floodplain analysis.

Capital Improvements
The floodplains for the USACE LSJRP capital improvement area originated from the USACE Risk and Uncertainty (R&U) composite floodplains developed as part of the USACE Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study (LSJRFS)7. The USACE composite floodplains were developed to compare the extents of flooding with- and without the LSJRP (Phase 1) improvements in place. 6 San Joaquin County. “Zoning.shp”. GIS Shapefile Acquired July 2015. 7 USACE. Integrated Interim Feasibility Report/ Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report.

San Joaquin River Basin, Lower San Joaquin River.

ATTACHMENT E 1610
0 1.75 3.5
Mi
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2270 Douglas Blvd, Suite 118
Roseville, CA 95661
(209)304-1739
O&M Services
Models Supporting Evaluation of Benefit from O&M
Date: 2/3/2023
Figure
1 µ
Path: C:\Users\NickMcGuire\R&F Engineering, Inc\R&F Engineering - Documents\4.0 GIS\Project\SJAFCA\LSJR-O&M Assessment\APRX\Presentation Model Extent Figure.aprx Zone 9 Maintained Channels
CVFED FLO-2D Area
PBI HEC-RAS Model Area
Calaveras River
Mosher Slough
Mormon Slough
San Joaquin River
Duck Creek
North Littlejohns Creek
Bear Creek
ATTACHMENT E 1611
Technical Memorandum
LCMA Floodplain Analysis 5 March 16, 2023
Methodology
The following subsections summarize the methodology used to help identify proportionate benefit provided to each parcel from the O&M services and from the USACE LSJRP capital improvements.

O&M Services
To identify the areas protected by Zone 9-maintained project levees, a levee breach modeling analysis was conducted to identify flood extents and depths that would result in a levee failure scenario on these levees. A total of 72 breach scenarios were completed to represent flooding that could occur if a Zone 9-maintained levee were to fail at a specific location within the system. A 200-year flow event was used as the basis of the breach analysis to show the potential floodplains in a scenario where the system was flowing full. Figure 2 provides an overview of the breach locations included in this analysis The DWR CVFED modeling covered 54 breach scenarios throughout the study area. A portion of the levee on the Calaveras River downstream of Brookside Road is maintained by others and that portion was excluded from the breach analysis. The PBI model covered the 18 additional breach locations (for a total of 72 breach scenarios) . A channel overtopping scenario was also included in this analysis to determine flood depths that result without levee breaches when the channels exceed their capacity. As the channel overtopping is not prevented by Levee O&M services, this additional scenario was ultimately not utilized in LWA’s analysis of special benefits.

ATTACHMENT E 1612
µ
0 1 2
Mi
Date: 2/3/2023
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Breach Location Overview for
Zone 9 O&M Project Levees
Figure
2 Breach Location
River
Path: C:\Users\NickMcGuire\R&F Engineering, Inc\R&F Engineering - Documents\4.0 GIS\Project\SJAFCA\LSJR-O&M Assessment\APRX\Breach Location\Breach Location.aprx 2270 Douglas Blvd, Suite 118
Roseville, CA 95661
(209)304-1739
PDC_R6
BRC_R10
MHC_R1
MHC_L2
SPC_R1
PDC_L1
WRS_R1
SPC_L1
SDC_R4
SDC_L7
SDC_L5
SDC_L1
PXS_R3
PXS_L2
PDC_L2
MHC_L1
MPC_L1
MNS_R1 MNS_R2
MNS_L2
MNS_L1
MHD_L1
LMH_R1
CSR_L3
BRC_R9 BRC_R7
BRC_R6
BRC_R5
BRC_R4
BRC_R3
BRC_L9
BRC_L8
BRC_L7
BRC_L2
BRC_L14
WRS_L1
BRC_L11
SDC_R3
SDC_L6
SDC_L4
SDC_L3 SDC_L2
PXS_R2
PXS_R1
PXS_L1
SDC_R5
PDC_R3
PDC_R1
PCA_L1
MPC_L2
LMH_L1
FCS_R1
FCS_L1
CSR_R5
CSR_R4
CSR_R3 CSR_R2
CSR_R1
CSR_L2
CSR_L1
BRC_R8
BRC_R14
BRC_R13
BRC_R12
BRC_R11
BRC_R1
BRC_L5
BRC_L4
BRC_L3
BRC_L13
BRC_L10
BRC_L6
Lodi
Stockton
ATTACHMENT E 1613
Technical Memorandum
LCMA Floodplain Analysis 7 March 16, 2023
During the analysis, it was observed that some of the floodplains from the DWR CVFED FLO2D model needed to be refined due to the coarse resolution of the model grid cells (250ft x 250ft).

Parcels adjacent to levees and waterways were not captured as being within the floodplain due to the model’s grid cell size. Refinements were made within GIS to assign flood depths to these areas by interpolating adjacent flooded cells. An example of this correction is shown below in Figures 3 & 4.

Figure 3 (left) & Figure 4 (right): FLO2D Floodplain Shows No Flooding in Various Parcels Along the landside levee toes (Left).

And Modified Floodplain to More Accurately Estimate Flooding in Parcels Along the Levee toes (Right).

To generate flooding statistics for each parcel in the study area, GIS shapefiles with parcel-level data were generated for the 72 levee breach scenarios. The parcel-level data include the average floodplain depth (feet) and total wetted area (acres) for each parcel and each scenario, as described in Attachment A.

Additionally, levee reaches (and the corresponding breach scenarios) were categorized by whether they were FEMA accredited, cost-shared with other public entities, and/or if they are USACE Project Levees.

Capital Improvements
To assist in the determination of the proportionate benefit provided to each parcel by the USACE LSJRP capital improvements, floodplain modeling from the USACE LSJRFS for the 100- year flow scenario was used.

A “composite” floodplain was created from the individual levee breach scenarios that were modeled by USACE on levees that are part of the USACE LSJRP. The composite floodplain captures the anticipated worst-case scenario of flooding of all the breach scenarios for each parcel.

Similar to the O&M analysis, GIS shapefiles with parcel-level flooding data were generated and to identify the average floodplain depth (feet) and total wetted area (acres) for each parcel, as presented in Attachment B.

ATTACHMENT E 1614
Technical Memorandum
LCMA Floodplain Analysis 8 March 16, 2023
Floodplain Analyses Results
The following subsections and figures summarize the results of the floodplain analyses.

O&M Services
The results of the O&M floodplain analysis are shown in Figure 5 which includes a composite of the 72 individual levee breach scenarios located on Zone 9 maintained Project levees. The map also includes flooding in areas where channels exceed capacity and are overtopped, however this “overtopping” flooding was backed out of LWAs assessment analysis as channel overtopping is not prevented by Levee O&M services.

Capital Improvements
The results of the capital improvement levee breach analysis are shown in Figure 6, which are areas that could be inundated if a levee breach were to occur on a USACE LSJRP levee.

Summaries of parcel-level flooding data for the O&M Services and the USACE LSJRP capital improvements were generated in GIS and are included in Attachments A and B, respectively.

ATTACHMENT E 1615
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2270 Douglas Blvd, Suite 118
Roseville, CA 95661
(209)304-1739
O&M Services
Composite Floodplain of Areas Maintained by
San Joaquin County Zone 9 Date: 2/3/2023
Figure
5 Path: C:\Users\NickMcGuire\R&F Engineering, Inc\R&F Engineering - Documents\4.0 GIS\Project\SJAFCA\LSJR-O&M Assessment\APRX\Presentation Floodplain Figure.aprx µ
0 2.5 5 1.25
Miles
Mosher Slough
Calaveras River
Duck Creek
North Littlejohns Creek
San Joaquin River
Breach Location
> 5
2 - 5
1 - 2

0.5 - 1
< 0.5
Floodplain Depth (ft)
Bear Creek
Mormon Slough
ATTACHMENT E 1616
FR1
CL1
D5
D4
CR1
D3
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2270 Douglas Blvd, Suite 118
Roseville, CA 95661
(209)304-1739
Composite Floodplain of Levee Breaches
Occurring on USACE LSJRP Levees
Date: 2/3/2023
Figure
6 Path: C:\Users\NickMcGuire\R&F Engineering, Inc\R&F Engineering - Documents\4.0 GIS\Project\SJAFCA\LSJR-O&M Assessment\APRX\Presentation AD Project Breaches.aprx > 5
2 - 5
1 - 2

0.5 - 1
< 0.5
Inundation from Breaches on USACE
LSJRP Levees (ft)
USACE LSJRP Levees
Mosher Slough
Calaveras River
Duck Creek
North Littlejohns Creek
San Joaquin River
µ
0 0.5 1
Mi
ATTACHMENT E 1617
Technical Memorandum
LCMA Floodplain Analysis 11 March 16, 2023
Assessment Boundary Delineations
The Proposed Assessment Boundary encompasses all properties that receive a special benefit from Zone 9 O&M Services and from the USACE LSJRP. The floodplain analyses discussed above were used as a starting point in developing a proposed benefit area for the LCMA District. The following subsections summarize the process that was used to delineate the final area of benefit.

O&M Assessment Boundary
As described in the previous sections, to determine areas that benefit from the Levee O&M Services on the Zone 9 Project levees, modeling of various levee breach scenarios was performed to identify properties that would be inundated if those levees were to break. From these analyses, a composite floodplain was developed (previously shown in Figure 5). The resulting floodplain from each breach was overlaid in GIS onto the San Joaquin County parcel database to identify the average flood depth, total area of flooding, and length of levee that is providing protection for each parcel. The final assessment boundary for Levee O&M Services was delineated based on the boundaries of the parcels that are flooded from levee breaches on Zone 9 maintained Project levees.

Capital Assessment Boundary
Properties receiving special benefit from the USACE LSJRP (and associated incremental levee O&M for the LSJRP) were identified using a combination of floodplain mapping that included:
a) The 100-year composite without project floodplain based on breaches of levees to be improved by the USACE LSJRP (previously shown in Figure 6); b) The FEMA Shaded Zone X mapping for north and central Stockton; and, c) Additional hydraulic modeling showing the extent of the inundation from breaches of upstream FEMA Accredited Levees.

Benefits to properties can be due to avoidance of actual flood damage and/or avoidance of regulatory impacts. The composite without-project floodplain map, utilizing USACE floodplain mapping data, was prepared to identify the specific area benefiting from the improvements on the LSRJP levees. To further acknowledge the risk of regulatory impacts and the need to continue FEMA accreditation of this area, the extent of the floodplain for properties benefiting from FEMA Accredited levees in the same levee system was overlaid onto the composite breach floodplain (see Figure 7). To further confirm the extents of flooding that would result from a break on the upstream FEMA-accredited levees, modeling of breaches on these levees is also included on Figure 7.

ATTACHMENT E 1618
CSR_R5
CSR_R4
SDC_L6
SDC_L5
SDC_L4
SDC_L3
SDC_L2
SDC_L1
PCA_L1
SDC_L7
CSR_L2
CSR_R3
MNS_L1
CSR_R2
FR1
CL1
D5
D4
CR1
D3
0 0.5 1
Mi
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2270 Douglas Blvd, Suite 118
Roseville, CA 95661
(209)304-1739
Overlay of Capital Improvement
Floodplain Boundaries
Date: 3/16/2023
Figure
7 Path: C:\Users\AndrewNisenberg\R&F Engineering, Inc\R&F Engineering - Documents\4.0 GIS\Project\SJAFCA\LSJR-O&M Assessment\APRX\Presentation AD Flood Boundary.aprx > 5
2 - 5
1 - 2

0.5 - 1
< 0.5
Inundation from Breaches on USACE
LSJRP Levees (ft)
Inundation from Breaches on Upstream FEMA
Accredited Levees
FEMA “X Protected by Levee” Zone
Proposed Capital Boundary
USACE LSJRP Levees
Breaches on USACE LSJRP Levees
Breaches on Upstream Accredited Levees
Mosher Slough
Calaveras River
Duck Creek
North Littlejohns Creek
San Joaquin River
µ
ATTACHMENT E 1619
Technical Memorandum
LCMA Floodplain Analysis 13 March 16, 2023
The three described components designate the full extent of the area benefiting from Levee Capital Services for FEMA Accredited Levees. Because different sources of floodplain mapping were combined, the floodplain mapping associated with the FEMA Accredited levee breaches was only utilized to inform the extent of the benefit area from Levee Capital Services, not floodplain depths. The final capital assessment boundary (Figure 8) follows the impacted parcel boundaries.

ATTACHMENT E 1620
0 0.5 1
Mi
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2270 Douglas Blvd, Suite 118
Roseville, CA 95661
(209)304-1739
Capital Assessment Boundary
Date: 3/16/2023
Figure
8 µ
Path: C:\Users\AndrewNisenberg\R&F Engineering, Inc\R&F Engineering - Documents\4.0 GIS\Project\SJAFCA\LSJR-O&M Assessment\APRX\Presentation AD Proposed and Final Boundary.aprx Calaveras River
Mosher Slough
Mormon Slough
San Joaquin River
Duck Creek
North Littlejohns Creek
Initial Floodplain Boundary
Capital Assessment Boundary
ATTACHMENT E 1621
Technical Memorandum
LCMA Floodplain Analysis 15 March 16, 2023
LCMA District Boundary
The area of special benefit from O&M Services and from the USACE LSJRP capital improvements were combined (Figure 9). The final LCMA Boundary is presented in Figure 10.

ATTACHMENT E 1622
0 1.5 3
Mi

SJAFCA LCMA
2270 Douglas Blvd, Suite 118
Roseville, CA 95661
(209)304-1739
Combined Boundaries
O&M Services & Capital Improvements
Date: 3/16/2023
Figure
9 µ
Path: C:\Users\AndrewNisenberg\R&F Engineering, Inc\R&F Engineering - Documents\4.0 GIS\Project\SJAFCA\LSJR-O&M Assessment\APRX\Presentation Boundaries Figure.aprx Zone 9 Maintained Levees
Zone 9 OM Assessment Boundary
Capital Assessment Boundary
Calaveras River
Mosher Slough
Mormon Slough
San Joaquin River
Duck Creek
North Littlejohns Creek
ATTACHMENT E 1623
0 1.5 3
Mi
SJAFCA Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment
2270 Douglas Blvd, Suite 118
Roseville, CA 95661
(209)304-1739
LCMA District Boundary
Date: 3/16/2023
Figure
10 µ
Path: C:\Users\AndrewNisenberg\R&F Engineering, Inc\R&F Engineering - Documents\4.0 GIS\Project\SJAFCA\LSJR-O&M Assessment\APRX\Presentation LCMA Boundary Figure.aprx LCMA Boundary
Calaveras Rive
Mosher
r
Slough
Mormon Slough
San Joaquin River
Duck Creek
North Littlejohns Creek
ATTACHMENT E 1624

ATTACHMENT A
Metadata for GIS Deliverables
for the O&M Assessment Analyses
ATTACHMENT E 1625
LSJRP O&M Assessment District 1 September 21, 2022
Attachment A
Assessment Reaches.shp:

Description: All of the levees in the study area were broken down into segments. Each levee segment is associated with a modeled levee breach (see Breach Location Final.shp).

Brch_Rch: Name of reach
Breach Location Final.shp:

Description: 72 levee breaches were modeled for this study. This shapefile shows location and name/ID of each breach. It also indicates whether or not the breach location is on a Project levee, a SJAFCA levee, or a FEMA-accredited levee.

River: River the breach is located on
Code Name: Name of the breach. Note: some breaches are grouped together from original source.

Project: Is the breach on a Project or non-Project levee? SJAFCA: Is the breach on a levee cost shared with SJAFCA? FEMA: Is the breach on a FEMA accredited levee?
Parcel Ave Depth.shp:

Description: This shapefile shows the average depth of flooding on each parcel for each of the 72 levee breach scenarios that were run for this study. Levee breach locations were named according to the river that they are on and whether they’re on the left bank or right bank levee. This shapefile also shows the average depth of flooding on each parcel for the no breach/overtopping only scenario in the PBI (HEC-RAS) model.

ATTACHMENT E 1626
LSJRP O&M Assessment District 2 September 21, 2022
Attachment A
The average flood depth recorded is for the wetted area of the parcel only (zero depth/dry areas were not included in calculating the average depth of flooding).

The shapefile also has columns that show the total area of the parcel (acres) and the worst-case flood depth (feet) on each parcel.

Note: See the shapefile “Parcel Wetted Area.shp” which indicates how many acres of the parcel got wet for each breach scenario.

APN: APN
Area_acre: Total area of the parcel (in acres)
BRC_L2 through WRS_L1: The column headers are the name given to each breach location. Average depth of flooding (in feet) associated with each breach per the name of the field
NoBreach: Average depth of flooding (in feet) associated with the no breach/overtopping only scenario in the PBI (HEC-RAS) model Parcel Wetted Area.shp:

Description: See description for the “Parcel Ave Depth.shp” shapefile. Everything is set up the same, except the values in this shapefile indicate how many acres of the parcel got wet for each breach scenario.

ATTACHMENT E 1627

ATTACHMENT B
Metadata for GIS Deliverables
for the Capital Assessment Analyses
ATTACHMENT E 1628
Parcel Average Depth.shp:

Description: This shapefile shows the average depth of flooding of each parcel for each of the 12 flood scenarios that were analyzed for this study. Scenarios are labeled according to “with project” and “without project” conditions and each return period event. The average flood depth recorded is for the wetted area of the parcel only (zero depth/dry areas were not included in calculating the average depth of flooding).

The shapefile also has columns that show: What is the total area of the parcel in acres? What is the worst-case flood depth on each parcel?
Notes:

1. There are no parcels with flooding for the 2-, 10-, and 25-year with-project events.

2. See the shapefile “Parcel Wetted Area.shp” which indicates how many acres of the parcel got wet for each flood scenario.

APN: APN
Area: Total area of the parcel (in acres)
Max: The worst-case average depth of flooding (in feet) across all scenarios WP_2YR through WOP_200YR: The column headers are the name given to each flood scenario. Average depth of flooding (in feet) is associated with each scenario per the name of the field
Parcel Wetted Area.shp:

Description: See description for the “Parcel Ave Depth.shp” shapefile. Everything is set up the same, except the values in this shapefile indicate how many acres of the parcel got wet for each breach scenario
ATTACHMENT E 1629
San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
Levee Construction and
Maintenance Assessment
(LCMA)
Appendix D
Assessment District Boundary Diagram
(reduced from 18”x26” to 11”x17”)
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Date: March 16, 2023
ATTACHMENT E 1630

ATTACHMENT E
1631
San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
Levee Construction and
Maintenance Assessment
(LCMA)
Appendix E
San Joaquin County Use Codes
& Assessment Land Use Categories
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Date: March 16, 2023
ATTACHMENT E 1632
Appendix E
Levee Capital and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)
San Joaquin County Use Codes & Assessment Land Use Categories Use Code County Description Land Use Category
/ Sub‐Category
1 Vacant Residential Lot – Development with Utilities Open Space ‐ Developed 2 Vacant Lot with PROB. W/C Precludes Building A RE Open Space 3 Vacant Lot – Totally Unusable (incurable) Open Space
4 Vacant Residential Lot with miscellaneous Residential IMPRS (garage)
Open Space ‐ Developed
5 Vacant Residential Subdivision Site Open Space
6 Vacant Residential Lot‐ Undeveloped Open Space
7 Potential Residential Subdivision Open Space
10 Single‐Family Dwelling (SFD) Single‐Family Residential 11 Condominium Unit Multi‐Family Residential
12 Planned Unit Residential Development (PURD) Single‐Family Residential 13 Single‐Family Residence with Secondary Residential Square Footage
Single‐Family Residential
14 SFD with Secondary Use (i.e., barber shop) Single‐Family Residential 15 Zero Lot Line Residential Single‐Family Residential
16 Residential Lot with Mobile Home Mobile Home
17 Single‐Family with Common Wall (duet, halfplex, etc.) Single‐Family Residential 20 Vacant Lot (zoned for two units) Open Space
21 One Duplex – One Building Single‐Family Residential
22 Two SFDs On Single Parcel Multi‐Family Residential
30 Vacant Lot Zoned for 3 or 4 Units Open Space
31 Single Triplex – (3 units, 1 structure) Single‐Family Residential 32 Three Units ‐ 2 or More Structures Multi‐Family Residential 34 Single Fourplex Multi‐Family Residential
35 Four Units, 2 or More Structures Multi‐Family Residential 40 Vacant Lots Zoned for Apartments Open Space
41 5‐10 Residential Units – Single Building Multi‐Family Residential 42 5‐10 Residential Units – 2 or more Buildings Multi‐Family Residential 43 11‐20 Residential Units – One Structure Multi‐Family Residential 44 11‐20 Residential Units – 2 or more Buildings Multi‐Family Residential 45 21‐40 Units Multi‐Family Residential
46 41‐100 Units Multi‐Family Residential
47 Over 100 Units Multi‐Family Residential
48 High‐Rise Apartments Multi‐Family Residential
50 Rural Residential – Vacant Homesite Agricultural
51 Rural Residence – 1 Residence Rural Residential
52 Rural Residential – 2 or more residences Rural Residential 53 Rural Residential – Vacant – Development with Open Space ‐ Developed 54 Rural Residences. ‐ with Miscellaneous Residences. IMPS; Only
Open Space
55 Labor Camp Rural Residential
56 Rural Residential with Mobil Home Mobile Home
Prepared by LWA Page E ‐ 1 1808000 LCMA ER Tables 2023.02.27.xlsx ATTACHMENT E 1633
Appendix E
Levee Capital and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)
San Joaquin County Use Codes & Assessment Land Use Categories Use Code County Description Land Use Category
/ Sub‐Category
59 Residential Care Home (6 units or less) Multi‐Family Residential 60 Motels Less Than 50 Units Commercial
61 Motels Over 50 Units Commercial
62 Motels less than 50 units with some kitchens Commercial 63 Motels over 50 Units with some Kitchens Commercial
64 Motels Less Than 50 Units with Shops Commercial
65 Motels Over 50 Units with Shops Commercial
68 Resort Motels – Cabins, Etc. Commercial
70 Hotel without Restaurant Commercial
71 Hotel with Restaurant Commercial
78 Rooming House – Convent – Rectory, Etc. Commercial
80 Common Areas – No Structures Open Space
81 Common Areas – with Structures Open Space ‐ Developed 82 Common Areas – Roads and Streets Open Space
90 Mobile Home Park Mobile Home
91 Overnight Type Trailer Park Open Space
92 Mobile Home Park with Overnight Facilities Mobile Home 93 Resort Type Trailer Park Mobile Home
94 Mobile Home Condominium Lot Mobile Home
95 Mobile Home Appurtenances Mobile Home
96 Mobile Home Mobile Home
100 Vacant Commercial Land – Undeveloped Open Space
101 Vacant Commercial Land with Utilities Open Space ‐ Developed 102 Vacant Commercial Land with Miscellaneous IMPS Open Space ‐ Developed 107 Potential Commercial Subdivision Open Space
110 Single‐Story Commercial
111 Multiple‐Story Stories Commercial
112 Multiple Stores in one Building Commercial
113 Store with Residential Unit or Units Commercial
114 Store Condo Commercial
120 1 store and 1 office Commercial
121 Multiple Combination of Offices, Shops Commercial
130 1‐Story Department Store Commercial
131 2‐Story Department Store Commercial
140 Grocery Store Commercial
141 Supermarkets Commercial
142 Convenience Store Commercial
143 Convenience Store with Gas Sales Commercial
144 Fruit Stand Commercial
150 Regional Shopping Center Commercial
151 Community Shopping Center Commercial
152 Neighborhood Shopping Center Commercial
Prepared by LWA Page E ‐ 2 1808000 LCMA ER Tables 2023.02.27.xlsx ATTACHMENT E 1634
Appendix E
Levee Capital and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)
San Joaquin County Use Codes & Assessment Land Use Categories Use Code County Description Land Use Category
/ Sub‐Category
153 Individual Parcel Within Regional Shopping Commercial 154 Individual Parcel Within Community Center Commercial 155 Individual Parcel within neighborhood Shopping Commercial 156 Shopping Center Common Area Commercial
170 1‐Story Office Building Commercial
171 2‐Story Office Building Commercial
172 3 or More Story Office Building Commercial
173 Office Building with Residential Unit or Units Commercial 180 Assisted Living Residence Multi‐Family Residential
181 Congregate Seniors Housing Multi‐Family Residential 182 Continuing Care Retirement Community Multi‐Family Residential 183 Skilled Nursing Facility Multi‐Family Residential
184 Specialty Home (Developmentally Disable) Multi‐Family Residential 190 Medical Offices Commercial
191 Dental Offices Commercial
192 Medical Dental Complex Commercial
193 Veterinary Hospitals Commercial
194 One‐Story Office Condo Commercial
195 Two‐Story Office Condo Commercial
196 Medical Office Condo Commercial
197 Dental Office Condo Commercial
200 Commercial Common Area – Non Shopping C Commercial
201 Miscellaneous Multiple Uses – None Fully Dominant Commercial 202 Commercial Use Commercial
203 Animal Training Facility Commercial
204 Day Care Center Commercial
210 Restaurants Commercial
211 Fast Food Restaurants Commercial
212 Food Preparation – Take Out Only Commercial
213 Cocktail Lounge – Bars Commercial
214 Restaurant with Residential Unit or Units Commercial 230 Walk‐In Theaters Commercial
231 Multiple Screen Theaters Commercial
240 Banks Commercial
250 Full Service Stations Commercial
251 Self Service. Station (has no facilities) Commercial 252 Service Station with Car Wash Commercial
253 Truck Terminals Commercial
254 Bulk Plants Commercial
255 Self Service Station with Mini Mart Commercial
256 Convenience Store (mini‐mart) with gas station Commercial 260 Auto Sales with Service Center Commercial
Prepared by LWA Page E ‐ 3 1808000 LCMA ER Tables 2023.02.27.xlsx ATTACHMENT E 1635
Appendix E
Levee Capital and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)
San Joaquin County Use Codes & Assessment Land Use Categories Use Code County Description Land Use Category
/ Sub‐Category
261 Auto Sales without Service Center Commercial
262 Used Car Lot Commercial
263 Other Sales Centers (Trailers, mobile home Commercial 270 Farm or CONTS. Machine Sales and Service Commercial 271 Farm or CONTS. Machine Sales Only Commercial
272 Farm or CONST. Machine Sales Only Commercial
280 Auto and Truck Repairs and Accessories Commercial
281 Specialty Shops (Tires, Brakes, Etc.) Commercial
282 Car Wash Commercial
283 Self Service Car Wash Commercial
284 Laundry Commercial
285 Auto Body Shop Commercial
290 Retail Nursery Commercial
291 Commercial/Wholesale Nursery Commercial
296 Commercial Commercial
300 Vacant Industrial Land Undeveloped Open Space
301 Vacant Industrial Land – Developed With Open Space ‐ Developed 302 Vacant Industrial Land with Miscellaneous IMPS Open Space ‐ Developed 307 Potential Industrial Subdivision Open Space
310 Light Manufacturing and Light Industrial Industrial 311 Light Industrial and Warehousing Industrial
312 Light Industrial Warehouse Multiple Tenants Industrial 313 Industrial Condo Industrial
314 Shop‐Work Area with Small Office Commercial
320 Warehousing – Active Industrial
321 Warehousing – Inactive Industrial
323 Warehousing – Yard Industrial
324 Mini Storage Warehousing Industrial
330 Lumber Mills Industrial
331 Retail Lumber Yards Industrial
332 Specialty Lumber Products (Mouldings, SA Industrial 340 Packing Plants Industrial
341 Cold Storage or Refrigerated Warehouse Industrial
350 Fruit and Vegetable Industrial
351 Meat Products Industrial
352 Large Winery Industrial
353 Small/Boutique Winery Commercial
355 Other Food Processing Industrial
360 Feed and Grain Mills Industrial
361 Retail Feed and Grain Sales Industrial
362 Stockyards Industrial
363 AG Chemical Sales and/or Application Industrial
Prepared by LWA Page E ‐ 4 1808000 LCMA ER Tables 2023.02.27.xlsx ATTACHMENT E 1636
Appendix E
Levee Capital and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)
San Joaquin County Use Codes & Assessment Land Use Categories Use Code County Description Land Use Category
/ Sub‐Category
370 Heavy Industry Industrial
371 Shipyard Industrial
380 Mineral Processing Industrial
381 Sand and Gravel – Shale Industrial
390 Industrial Common Area Industrial
391 Miscellaneous Industrial Multiple Uses – None Full Industrial 392 Industrial Use (doesn't reasonably fit any Industrial 393 Airport (private Commercial
400 Irrigated Orchard Agricultural
401 Irrigated Orchard with Residence Agricultural
410 Irrigated Agricultural
411 Irrigated Agricultural
420 Irrigated Vineyard Agricultural
421 Irrigated Vineyard with Residence Agricultural
450 Irrigated Row Crops Agricultural
451 Irrigated Row Crops with Residence Agricultural
460 Irrigated Pasture Agricultural
461 Irrigated Pasture with Residence Agricultural
462 Horse Ranch Agricultural
463 Horse Ranch with Residence Agricultural
470 Dairy Agricultural
471 Dairy with Residence Agricultural
480 Poultry Ranch Agricultural
481 Poultry Ranch with Residence Agricultural
490 Feed Lots Agricultural
500 Dry Farm Agricultural
501 Dry Farm with Residence Agricultural
510 Dry Graze Agricultural
511 Dry Graze with Residence Agricultural
520 Non‐Irrigated Vineyards Agricultural
521 Non‐Irrigated Vineyards with Residence Agricultural 530 Specialty Farms Agricultural
540 Agricultural Agricultural
550 Tree Farm Agricultural
551 Tree Farm (with or without residence) Agricultural
570 Agricultural Agricultural
590 Waste Lands Open Space
591 Berms Open Space
610 Swim Centers Commercial
611 Recreational Centers Commercial
612 Marina or Yachting Club Commercial
613 Racquetball Club Commercial
Prepared by LWA Page E ‐ 5 1808000 LCMA ER Tables 2023.02.27.xlsx ATTACHMENT E 1637
Appendix E
Levee Capital and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)
San Joaquin County Use Codes & Assessment Land Use Categories Use Code County Description Land Use Category
/ Sub‐Category
614 Tennis Club Commercial
615 Private Campground or Resort Commercial
620 Privately Owned Dance Halls Commercial
630 Bowling Alleys Commercial
631 Arcades and Amusement Centers Commercial
632 Skating Rink Commercial
640 Clubs, Lodge Halls Commercial
650 Privately Owned Auditoriums and Stadiums Commercial 660 18‐Hole Public Golf Course Open Space
661 9‐Hole Public Golf Course Open Space
662 Country Club Open Space
664 Driving Range Open Space
670 Privately Owned Race Tracks Commercial
680 Non‐Profit Organizations Camps (Boy Scouts, Etc.) Commercial 690 Privately Owned Parks Open Space
710 Church, Synagogue or Temple Commercial
711 Other Church Property Commercial
720 Private School School
721 Parochial School School
722 Special School School
730 Private Colleges School
740 Full Service Hospital Commercial
742 Clinic Commercial
760 Orphanages Commercial
770 Cemeteries (non‐profit) Open Space
771 Mortuaries and Funeral Homes Commercial
772 Cemetery Taxable (profit) Open Space
810 SBE valued Open Space ‐ Developed
811 Utility Water Company Open Space
812 Mutual Water Company Open Space
813 Cable TV Open Space
814 Radio and TV Broadcast Site Open Space
815 Pipeline Right‐Of‐Way Open Space
816 Open Space Open Space
850 Right‐Of‐Way Open Space
851 Private Road Open Space ‐ Developed
860 Well Site Open Space
861 Tank Site Open Space
862 Springs and Other Water Sources Open Space
870 Rivers and Lakes Open Space
890 Parking Lots – Fee Open Space ‐ Developed
891 Parking Lots – No Fee Open Space ‐ Developed
Prepared by LWA Page E ‐ 6 1808000 LCMA ER Tables 2023.02.27.xlsx ATTACHMENT E 1638
Appendix E
Levee Capital and Maintenance Assessment (LCMA)
San Joaquin County Use Codes & Assessment Land Use Categories Use Code County Description Land Use Category
/ Sub‐Category
892 Parking Garages Commercial
900 Vacant Federal Lands Open Space
901 Federal Buildings Commercial
902 Military Installation Commercial
903 Miscellaneous Federal Property Commercial
910 Vacant State Lands Open Space
911 State Buildings Commercial
912 State Shops & Yards Commercial
913 State Parks and Other Recreational Facilities Open Space ‐ Developed 914 State Schools, Colleges School
916 Miscellaneous State Property Commercial
920 Vacant County Land Open Space
921 County Buildings Commercial
923 County Parks and Other Recreational Facilities Open Space 924 County Hospitals Commercial
925 Miscellaneous County Property Commercial
930 Vacant City Lands Open Space
931 City Buildings Commercial
932 City Shops and Yard Commercial
933 City Parks and Other Recreational Facilities Open Space 934 Municipal Utility Prop. (reservoirs, sewer pipeline) Open Space ‐ Developed 935 Parking Lots – Garages Open Space ‐ Developed
936 Municipal Airports Commercial
937 Miscellaneous City Property Commercial
940 School District Properties Commercial
941 Fire Districts Commercial
942 Flood Control District Property Open Space
943 Water District Property Open Space
944 Miscellaneous District property Open Space
950 Public Owned Land – Non‐ Taxable Open Space
951 Public Owned Land – Taxable [Section 11] Open Space 1000 Calaveras AG Agricultural
1001 Stanislaus AG Agricultural
1002 Blended Blended
Source: ParcelQuest, San Joaquin County
Prepared by LWA Page E ‐ 7 1808000 LCMA ER Tables 2023.02.27.xlsx ATTACHMENT E 1639
San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
Levee Construction and
Maintenance Assessment
(LCMA)
Appendix F
List of Parcels and FY 2023/24 Assessment Roll
(Under Separate Cover)
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Date: March 16, 2023
ATTACHMENT E 1640
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION TO VOTE THE CITY’S BALLOT IN THE [AFFIRMATIVE / NEGATIVE]

FOR THE SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT OF CITY PROPERTIES LOCATED

WITHIN THE PROPOSED SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY LEVEE

CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
The City of Stockton (“City”) is a Member Agency of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency (“SJAFCA”); and
SJAFCA is partnering with the San Joaquin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone 9 (Zone 9), a division of San Joaquin County, to advance a special benefit assessment to raise additional funding to; fund the local cost share of the Lower San Joaquin River Federal Project, ensure continued Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) accreditation of the levees protecting North and Central Stockton; and, address a $1.5 million annual shortfall between existing and needed revenues for the proper maintenance of existing levees; and On March 16, 2023, the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency (“SJAFCA”), pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Government Code § 54703 et seq.), Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code § 53750 et seq.) noticed its intent to levy a special assessment to fund levee improvements and levee operations and maintenance services within a boundary encompassing all properties that benefit from the avoidance of flood damages; and
Pursuant to that action, the City is receipt of ballots relating to City-owned properties located within the boundary of SJAFCA’s proposed Levee Construction and Maintenance Assessment District; and
The City desires to vote its ballot in the [affirmative / negative], in [favor of / opposition to] imposing the special assessment, in order to support increased funding for levee construction and levee operations and maintenance services as performed by SJAFCA; now, therefore,
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
1641

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council of the City of Stockton directs the City Manager to vote and submit the City’s ballots for the PRFMA Special Benefit Assessment, according to Council direction, in the [affirmative / negative].

2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are appropriate and necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED May 23, 2023 .

KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1642
Levee Construction &
Maintenance Assessment
City of Stockton City CouncilMay 23, 2023Agenda Item 15.3 1643
Overview
2 • What is SJAFCA?• What is SCFCWCD Zone 9?• Problem & Solution• Proposed Property Assessment • Balloting Process & Timeline• Q&A 1644
What is SJAFCA?
3 • Joint Powers Authority (1995)
• Stockton, Lathrop, Manteca• San Joaquin County• San Joaquin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District
• Reduce and manage flood risk • Plans, finances, implements projects and programs
• 9-member Board of Directors
1645
What is SCFCWCD Zone 9?
4 • San Joaquin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone 9 (1961)
• Division of San Joaquin County• Maintains:
• 112 miles of urban levees• 119 miles of urban channels• 3 miles of rural levees• 152 miles of rural channels 1646
Zone 9
MaintainedFacilities
5 1647
Challenges
6 • State/federal regulations for
flood protection are becoming stricter
• Weather extremes are
unpredictable
• Every major storm event
stresses levee system
• Levees are the only/last
defense against flooding
1648
Problems to Avoid
7 • Physical damages from flooding
• Calaveras/San Joaquin Rivers• Creeks, Sloughs, Channels • Financial impacts from failure to meet changing state/federal regulations
• FEMA remapping of Special Flood Hazard Areas• Loss of federal funding for emergency repairs to levees 1649
Cost of Flood Damage
Depth Cost1 inch $10,8196 inches $21,1611 foot $29,3602 feet $36,3603 feet $39,8314 feet $43,400 Source: FEMA, based on 1,000 SF home
Within proposed assessment district
= 2,363 active NFIP Policies
1650
Cost of Regulatory Impacts
FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas
 Mandatory insurance for properties
with mortgages/loans
 Costs increase 18% per year Won’t fully cover damages Slow payment of claims Difference Average
Risk‐Based
Premium
Average
Current
Premium
Zip Code
95203
$ 959.13 $1,736.52
+ $777.39
95204 $1,048.75 $1,655.84
+ $607.10
Source: FEMA Risk Rating 2.0: Projected Premium Changes by Zip Code 1651
Cost of Regulatory Impacts
Public Law 84-99
 Loss of eligibility for federallyfunded emergency repairs Cost of repairing levees is 100% community responsibility
 Repairs typically $1M or more
1652
How do we
defend lives, property?
1) Improve levee
maintenance services
2) Improve levees beyond
100-year level of flood protection
1653
Improve Levee Maintenance (O&M Services)
12 Adequately fund maintenance for existing and improved levees o Removal of debris that obstructs storm water and flood flows, damages levees o Vegetation removal and controlo Rodent removal and control o Levee patrol during high water warning and flood stages o Resurfacing of levee maintenance and patrol roads
o Construction of erosion repair and protectiono Repair of levee embankments o Inspection and repair of gates
o State and federal inspections and evaluations
o State and federal permit applications and compliance
1654
Zone 9 Project Levee O&M Funding Need
Zone 9 Assessment
$2,716,000
Zone 9 Assessment
$2,716,000
Local Property Tax
$850,000
Local Property Tax
$850,000
SJAFCA AD‐96‐1
$904,000
SJAFCA AD‐96‐1
$904,000
Proposed
Assessment
$4,470,000 $1,484,000
$5,954,000
$0
$2,000,000$4,000,000$6,000,000$8,000,000
Current Funding Required Funding
Annual
Categories Budget
O&M $5,426,000Engineering $70,000State
& Fed Coordination $305,000
$153,000
Admin, Legal, Compliance,
Insurance
Subtotal Budget $5,954,000Current Zone
9 ($2,716,000)
Property Taxes ($850,000)SJAFCA AD 96‐1 ($904,000)Subtotal Revenues ($4,470,000) $1,484,000
LCMA Zone
9 O&M Budget
1655
Improve Levees (Capital
Services)
14 • Lower San Joaquin River Project
• $1.4 billion Federal project• Increases level of protection along Calaveras and San Joaquin Rivers/Delta (closer to 200-year)• Project includes:
• 23 miles of cutoff walls• 16 miles of other improvements• 2 closure structures (including Smith Canal Gate)• Construction to begin in 2024  Other projects necessary to maintain FEMA accreditation for 100-year flood protection 1656
Lower San Joaquin River Project Cost Share
15 Federal

65.0%
State
25%
SJAFCA State/Federal
= $1.26 Billion 10%
Local
= $140 Million
Based upon USACE 2017 cost estimate
& Lower San Joaquin River Project Partnership Agreement 1657
Economic Impact Analysis Summary
16 Overall Project Impacts Estimated total economic output of $1.83 billion (2023$) in the San Joaquin County (County) economy over a 19-year construction period
Prior Investment (2014-2022) $25.5 million in hard construction costs, estimated to have generated a total economic output of $37.1 million in the County economy
 Includes a total of $17.4 million in labor income Supported an average of about 30 jobs annually Planned Project Construction (2023-2033) Estimated total economic output of $1.79 billion (2023$) in the County economy  Includes a total of $776.5 million in labor income Expected to generate an average of about 1,000 jobs annually 1658
Annual Funding Requirement
17 Additional O&M of Zone
9 Levees: $1,484,000
Capital Improvement and Incremental O&M: $6,200,000
Estimated Annual Budget: $7,684,000*
*Proposed Budget for 2023/24. Can be increased each year by CPI, capped at 4% 1659
Proposed Assessment
18 Properties can only be assessed for benefit received • Avoided flood damages to land, structures and contents • Avoided financial impacts of not meeting state/federal regulations for levee maintenance and levels of protection • Assessment revenues may not be used for any purpose other than levee improvements and maintenance
1660
O&M
Breach LocationsZone 9ProjectLevees
19 1661
LCMA
Boundary Map
20 1662
Area of Benefit – Levee Improvements
21 1663
LCMA
Boundary Map by Service
22 1664
Assessment Methodology
Every property’s assessment differs based on property characteristics:
 Land use category Parcel size (acres) Location of Property – determines:
 Benefit of Levee O&M Services (Y/N) Which breach scenario impacts the parcel (for Levee O&M Services)  Benefit of Levee Capital Services (Y/N) In Smith Canal Area Assessment District (Y/N, only for Levee Capital Services) Depth of flooding for O&M and Capital (separately) 23 1665
Example Assessments – Single Family Home
24 Property Characteristics:• Land Use: Single-Family
Residential
• Parcel Sizes for Examples –

0.1 Acres, 0.25 Acres, 0.5 Acres
• Average flood depths by category
Categories
1) O&M Only (one breach)
2) O&M (three breaches) and Non‐LSJRP
Accredited Levees3) O&M (three breaches) and LSJRP Capital 1666
Examples – Single Family Home
25 1
2 3
Category O&M Capital Total
SFR ‐ 0.10 Acre Parcel
1) O&M only (one breach) $18.70 $0 $18.70
$34.25 $38.52 $72.77 2) O&M (three breaches) and Non‐LSJRP Accredited Levees 3) O&M (three breaches) and LSJRP Capital $34.25 $148.39 $182.64 SFR ‐ 0.25 Acre Parcel
1) O&M only (one breach) $46.75 $0 $46.75
$85.63 $39.72 $125.36 2) O&M (three breaches) and Non‐LSJRP Accredited Levees 3) O&M (three breaches) and LSJRP Capital $85.63 $149.59 $235.22 SFR ‐ 0.50 Acre Parcel
1) O&M only (one breach) $93.50 $0 $93.50
$171.27 $41.73 $212.99 2) O&M (three breaches) and Non‐LSJRP Accredited Levees 3) O&M (three breaches) and LSJRP Capital $171.27 $151.60 $322.86 1667
Assessment Weight by Land Use
26 Share of Total
Assessment
Proposed FY 2023/24
Assessment [1]
Average
Land Use Category Parcel Count Assessment
Agricultural 767 $14 $10,618 0.1%Blended 98 $1,831 $179,390 2.4% Commercial 3,382 $247 $836,238 11%
Industrial 961 $512 $492,057 6.4%
Mobile Home 143 $38 $5,479 0.1%
Multi‐Family Residential 5,834 $139 $809,548 10.6%
Open Space 2,527 $3 $7,567 0.1%
Open Space ‐ Developed 3,401 $5 $16,317 0.2%
Rural Residential 1,071 $8 $8,255 0.1%
School 167 $781 $130,486 1.7%
Single‐Family Residential 75,810 $68 $5,134,757 67.3%
Total 94,161 $82 $7,630,712 100.0%
[1] Includes $2 minimum assessment.
1668
Assessment Ranges (All Land Uses)
27 78% (73,300) will pay less than $9 per month ($100/year) 36,845
23,331
8,186
4,943
12,545
4,972
1,570 601 292 178 109 60 51 478
0 5,000
10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,000
Parcel Count
Parcel Count by Assessment Range
All Land Uses ‐ Parcel Count
LCMA Assessment Rates
1669
Assessment Ranges (Single Family Residential)
28 77% (58,000) will pay less than $9 per month ($100/year) 25,391
21,495
6,961
4,168
11,314
4,490
1,300 356 149 68 48 1 0
5,000
10,00015,00020,00025,00030,000
Parcel Count
Parcel Count by Assessment Range
Single‐Family Residential ‐ Parcel Counts
LCMA Assessment Rates
1670
Prop 218 Process
29  Property owners vote Weighted vote ($1 assessment = 1 vote) Ballots mailed to property owners (April 21) Public Hearing 6 p.m., June 8, SJ County BOS Chambers Ballot Tabulation (commencing June 9 until complete) SJAFCA Board meeting/Balloting Results (June 15) Majority Protest  Weight of ballots opposed exceed weight of ballots in favor 1671
Public Outreach
 2 Mailers + Ballot package 7 Community Meetings Small group meetings Hotline/email  Replacement ballots, appeals
 Assessment Calculator (online)
30 1672
More Information
31 • Hotline: (209) 475-7010• Email: [email protected]• www.sjafca.org/LCMA • Frequently Asked Questions• Boundary maps• Preliminary Engineer’s Report• Assessment calculator 1673
Questions &
Discussion
1674
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0417, Version: 1

HOLD PUBLIC HEARING TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR THE 2023-24 HOLIDAY PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

RECOMMENDATION
This scheduled noticed public hearing is being held to consider public comments and testimony regarding the Holiday Park Maintenance District 2023-24 proposed Assessment budget and the levy of assessments.

At the conclusion of the public hearing, if a majority protest does not exist, it is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:

1. Override any and all public hearing protests.

2. Approve the Annual Budget for Holiday Park Budget for FY2023-24.

3. Confirm and approve the assessment of $46,598 for the Holiday Park Maintenance District for FY2023-24.

4. Authorize the City of Stockton Chief Financial Officer to assess those parcels within the assessment district.

5. Certify the assessments meet the requirements pertaining to the levy of annual assessments.

6. Approve a subsidy in the amount of $116,735 from the Strong Communities Fund (210-000) to continue operations and maintenance of the facility.

7. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Summary
The City of Stockton owns the Holiday Park swimming pool located at 5703 Kermit Lane. The facility had been operated and maintained through an agreement with the Holiday Park Recreation Association (“Association”) from the pool’s construction in 1969 until May 2019, when the pool’s operation and maintenance reverted to the city. The pool is now open to the public with residents of the maintenance district receiving a discounted fee to use the pool.

Annually, City staff submits a budget (Attachment A) for operations and maintenance to the City Council for approval. The City Council approved budget forms the basis of an assessment of parcels within the maintenance district (Attachment B) related to the pool. Each year a public hearing is held, City of Stockton Page 1 of 5 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1675
File #: 23-0417, Version: 1
and the certified assessment is submitted to San Joaquin County based on County assessed property values.

In 1996, California voters passed Proposition 218, after which increases to the assessment were only allowed by a vote of the residents. Consequently, residents of the district have not favored any increase in the assessment to keep up with the cost of the pool maintenance and repair cost. The assessment rate has thus remained at $46,598 since 1996. The cost of operations has significantly increased over time and is higher than the annual assessment revenues.

From 2015 to 2017, the City Council approved a subsidy from the General Fund to keep the pool open to serve the community. Since 2017 the subsidy has been appropriated from the Strong Communities Fund, per City Council approval, on the condition that the Association would seek additional sources of funds and engage the district members to consider an election to raise the assessment. No additional funding sources were secured, and a survey of district members by the Association indicated there was no willingness to engage in the election process to increase the assessment.

In 2019, the agreement with the Association expired, and the pool was returned to the city. The 2019 assessment funds were used for significant repairs to the pool. In 2020, the city reopened the pool for the swim season, and assumed responsibility for pool operations. The 2021 and 2022 assessment funds were also used for repairs to the pool and opening of the swim season.

DISCUSSION
Background
On January 6, 1969, the City of Stockton completed the acquisition of two parcels located at 5703 Kermit Lane, Stockton, California on which the primary appurtenance was an aquatics facility, the Holiday Park swimming pool. The city accepted the Holiday Park Pool and adjacent parking lot as part of a parcel land transfer from the Holiday Park Recreation Association. On January 13, 1969, the City Council adopted Resolution 27450 creating the Holiday Park Maintenance District whereby the property lying within the district would be wholly assessed for the costs of maintaining, operating, and making necessary improvements, repairs, and upgrades to meet health and safety codes at the Holiday Park swimming pool.

There are 304 parcels assessed within Holiday Park Maintenance District. The assessment rate is established each year based on estimated expenditures and levied on parcels according to the County’s assessed valuation for each individual parcel within the district. In 1996, California voters passed Proposition 218, after which increases to assessments were only allowed by a vote of the residents. Votes to increase the assessments have failed to pass, thus the assessment has remained at $46,598 since 1996, an average cost of $153 per parcel. Of that assessment, San Joaquin County receives a fee of $700, and the City of Stockton Community Services Department receives $1,700 to administer the assessment. The remaining assessment, as needed, has been used by the Association for operations and maintenance, including all utilities, chemicals, supplies, repairs, staffing, professional services, and insurance.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 5 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1676
File #: 23-0417, Version: 1
From 1969 to 2019, the City contracted with the Association to maintain, operate, and make necessary improvements, repairs, and upgrades.

Due to financial hardships resulting from increasing costs and fixed assessment revenues, the pool was closed for the 2011, 2015 and 2019 swim seasons (approximately Memorial Day to Labor Day) because the assessment revenues were well below the expenses to repair, maintain, and operate the pool. Starting in 2015, the city began subsidizing the Association to keep the pool open while the Association board developed additional revenue sources.

In 2017, the Board requested an increased subsidy. City staff advised the Board the subsidy would not increase, and the Board agreed to poll the Association membership for a vote to increase the assessment or the pool could face closure due to deferred maintenance. City staff met with the Board and offered limited financial support for the budget shortfall, and the City Council approved a modest General Fund subsidy of $6,663. This was offered in part because City insurance requirements for pool operators had increased. Staff informed the Board that the subsidy would not continue to increase and explained the process and timeline for increasing the Assessment. The Board shared the requirements with the membership, and the city was notified that few residents in the Association were in support of increasing the assessment, even if it meant closing the pool.

In 2018, the City provided an additional $6,663 General Fund subsidy to assist with the shortfall while the Board worked to establish new revenue sources for pool operations. During the 2018 swim season, the pool facility was damaged by a hit and run driver, and the Community Services Department provided additional funds to assist with necessary health and safety repairs. Even with support from the city, the Board was unable to raise additional revenue to pay for a full season of operation and maintenance costs.

City Staff met with the Board president and treasurer on September 29, 2018, to discuss the future of the Association operating the pool. Staff held four formal meetings and regular telephone calls with the Board to find solutions to the operating deficits. On March 21, 2019, the Board informed the City that the Association did not have the ability to develop a financial plan, the support for increased assessments, and could no longer operate the pool for the 2019 season. Furthermore, the Association allowed the operations agreement to expire and did not seek renewal. Consequently, the City assumed responsibility for operating the pool, and on May 19, 2020, by way of Resolution 2020- 05-19-1501 adopted the annual budget, confirming the Holiday Park Maintenance district assessment for fiscal year 2020-2021. It also authorized a subsidy of up to $12,902 from the Strong Communities Fund to supplement funding for pool operations. During the year, staff monitored operational expenditures, reviewed prior year actual expenditures, and in completing a full cost of operations estimate for the FY 2021-2022, found that additional operational costs were being absorbed by the city.

On May 25, 2021, Resolution No. 2021-05-25-1601 was approved adopting the annual budget and $75,809.00 subsidy, confirming the Holiday Park Maintenance District Assessment for fiscal year 2021-2022.

City of Stockton Page 3 of 5 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1677
File #: 23-0417, Version: 1
On April 19, 2022, Resolution No. 2022-04-19-1601 was approved adopting the annual budget and $81,489 subsidy, confirming the Holiday Park Maintenance District Assessment for fiscal year 2022- 2023, authorizing the City of Stockton Chief Financial Officer to assess parcels within the district, and authorizing the City Manager to take all appropriate actions to implement.

Present Situation
A portion of pool operations are funded through an assessment that is subject to an annual public hearing and resolution presented to the City Council approving the assessment roll to San Joaquin County. The $46,598 assessment, unchanged since 1996, is not enough to cover all repair, maintenance, and operating costs. In 2021, the pool maintenance services contract with All Season Pool service ($34,500) was moved from Public Works budget to Community Services Aquatics Budget. The FY 2023-2024 proposed budget for pool maintenance, repair and landscaping is $47,226 total.

For the 2022 Aquatic season, the four City pools still welcomed 19,159 visitors. Holiday Park pool was the second most used pool with 4,647 users (24 percent); Oak Park pool saw the most users with 7,696 (41 percent). The current assessment of $46,598 funds approximately 38 percent of the cost to maintain and open the pool for recreational swimming. The requested subsidy of $116,735.00 intended to cover the increased utility, maintenance, security, and operations of the Holiday Park pool, will allow the City to continue operating the pool for the upcoming 2023 swim season, offering pool access for the Stockton community. Along with the City’s three other pools, Holiday Park pool is scheduled to open for this summer’s swim season on May 29, 2023.

Public Notice
“A Notice of Intent to Hold a Public Hearing” has been published at least ten (10) days prior to City Council Action.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The Proposed Budget recommends that receipts from assessment continue to be collected in the Holiday Park Assessment Fund (Account 680-0000-239.10-00 [0000-000-210090-780-781-00-00-000 -000-], a non-budgetary account).

Revenues from assessments cover the basic pool maintenance and landscape maintenance contract, but do not generate sufficient revenues for the remaining operational costs. The basic maintenance budget for Holiday Pool is included in the Recreation General Fund (5025-000-XXXXXX -100-125-000-000) and the remaining operational costs are funded by Strong Communities (5025- 000-XXXXXX-210-000-000-000). The Proposed action will allow for the continued collection of assessments and for these revenues to be transferred to the Recreation Fund for all actual maintenance costs incurred. In addition, the recommendation will authorize a subsidy from the Strong Communities Fund of up to $116,735.00 to offset costs of operations and maintenance more than the revenue received.

City of Stockton Page 4 of 5 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1678
File #: 23-0417, Version: 1
The table below provides operating expense details for Fiscal Years 2021-2022 through 2023-2024:

Attachment A - Holiday Park Annual Budget
Attachment B - Holiday Park Assessment District Map
City of Stockton Page 5 of 5 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1679

ATTACHMENT A

HOLIDAY PARK POOL RECREATION ASSOCIATION
ANNUAL BUDGET 2023-2024
INCOME
A. Assessments $46,598.00
TOTAL INCOME: $46,598.00

EXPENSES
A. Utilities:

PG&E $16,960.00
Water $9,000.00
Sewer $7,632.00
$33,592.00
B. Property Maintenance:

Publicity $400.00
Pool Operator (contract) $46,250.00
Maint.&Repair
(Pool & Landscaping) $47,226.00
Permit $500.00
Bay Alarm $1,680.00
Securitas $13,200.00
Janitorial $14,000.00
Plumbing 1,325.00
Fire 100.00
Pest 60.00
Incidental 5,000.00 $129,741.00
TOTAL EXPENSES: $163,333.00
(EXPENSES) OVER INCOME ($116,735.00)
1680

CAVE LN
R

WOOD CT

HUTCHINSON AV

CARRINGTON C

PLEASANT

LINDA SUE DR

SWAIN RD

BANBURY DR

RIDGEWAY AV
CAM

SWAIN RD
Y.CT

JEFFREY CT
UPRR
U
P
R
R

HEMET AV

DUVALL CT
H.CT

MAYFAIR AV

KERMIT LN

MARCH LN

CARNELIAN DR

ELAINE DR
COLE

AUDREY DR
R

CARRINGTON CI

SILVER BREEZE CT
N

VIEW AV
URY DR

KERMIT LN

GARNER LN
MARLIN

MORNING DEW PL
OD DR

HOLIDAY DR

CAMANCHE LN

KERMIT LN
DR

YORKSHIRE

MAYFAIR AV
V

ROBINHOOD DR
DR
722
5504
5412
5528
5423
5444
619
5616
711
5509
5501
5440
5431
5640
5608
5621
602
621
812
5520
5616
5633
827
5433
5536
5627
5609
5536
5447
709
5448 605
5417
821
610
5628
5519
5416
724
5639
5522
5634
5424
5408
5448
809
5525
5422
5634
708 5506
5442
5434
5610
5432
5419
810
5602
5443
5441
5415
611
818
714
5520
5449
5645
5446
603
5534
813
5533
5439
824
5503
813
5652
5407
721
5646
5622
618
5523
546
5541
5615
719
5517
530
606 5441
802
5512
613
5425
5445
5628
706
5511
5445
5506
5539
703
5622
5521
5418
5630
972
826
918
824
856
958
934
919
839
5637
837
5638
5420
5636
5645
825
930
851
829
869
818
910
848
911
857
819
909
926
904
860
849
847
872
812
836
917
951
5411
840 853
863
830
826
5412
823
845
964
825
5643
835
834
912
927
5404
832 845
5624
816
866
833
5419
831
810
5631
942
842
842
902
829
903
935
5618
5625
950
822
5814 826 831
742
5812
5817
821
711
635
775
722
5724
5716
735 731
740
754
619
702
714
621
601
833
602
704
769
613
724
604
723
626
713
5830
533
802
5721
708
832
757
815
827
5732
832
745
620
760
5818
710
5740
5748
610
615
5835
801
743
5806
824
738
812
5808
729
726 728
727
5829
766
707
625
5821 841
608
737
5715
725
807
5815
620
735
774
628
803
5811
818
5802
641
601
806
813
5658
5842
5833
716
614
647
603
617
881
717
701
607
806
719
5827
732
820
5809
814
5836
748
622
5803
629
632
721
705
609
627
713
716
729
5823
5743
808
703
719
836
751
616
711
809
720
805
763
5824
5735
748
5708
875
5742
5718
5726
878
5702
5706
5704
884
5734
5712
959
943
777
779

DETAIL AREA
#212929
04/23/15
0 95 190 380 Feet µ Legend
Holiday Park Assessment Parcels
Holiday Park
Assessment District
ATTACHMENT B 1681
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET, CONFIRMING THE

HOLIDAY PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF STOCKTON CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFICER TO ASSESS PARCELS WITHIN THE DISTRICT, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL APPROPRIATE ACTIONS

TO IMPLEMENT
The City of Stockton (City) accepted the Holiday Park swimming pool as part of a parcel of land transfer recorded under San Joaquin County deed number 326-211, on January 6, 1969, from the Holiday Park Recreation Association; and On November 25, 1968, the city adopted Resolution No. 27,384, and on January 13, 1969, the city adopted Resolution No. 27,450 creating the Holiday Park Maintenance District whereby the lands lying within the district would be wholly assessed for the costs and expenses of maintaining and operating the improvements described in the deeded acquisition; and
Since acquiring the Holiday Park pool in 1969, the City has contracted with the Holiday Park Recreation Association continuously for maintenance and operations of the facility. The most recently executed agreement expired on May 12, 2019, and the Association decided not to renew, returning operations and maintenance responsibilities to the City; and
City staff established a budget report for operation and maintenance costs as evidenced by the declaration on file with the City Clerk, whereupon the public hearing was duly and regularly held at the time and place stated in the notice; and City utilized $46,598 (2022-2023) from the Holiday Park Maintenance District to bring Holiday Park swimming pool to City standards of operations (maintenance, water quality and overall pump efficiency); and City staff have estimated that an additional $116,735 is needed to operate the pool for the 2023 summer season: and
A notice of the public hearing was duly and regularly published in The Record in the time, form, and manner required by law; and The estimated cost of the benefits to be assessed to each parcel of real property within the Holiday Park Maintenance District will not change from the prior year; now, therefore,
1682

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Any and all protests made either to the Report, the proposed budget, or to the proposed levy of assessments and all persons desiring to be heard in relation to any of the matters, whether as protestants or otherwise, have been fully heard and considered, and any and all such protests or objections are hereby overruled.

2. The Annual Budget for Holiday Park Pool for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 is approved.

3. The subsidy of $116,735 from the Strong Communities Fund (5025-000-210) is approved.

4. The assessments follow all laws pertaining to the levy of the annual assessment. (Stockton Improvement Procedure Code, section 3.76.810 et seq.).

The purpose of the assessments is the maintenance and operation of the Holiday Park Swimming Pool facilities.

5. The assessments in the total amount of $46,598 are hereby approved, confirmed, and levied upon the parcels of real property within the Holiday Park Maintenance District.

6. The Chief Financial Officer or his designee is hereby directed to enter the assessments on the 2023-2024 tax roll for the parcels within the district as shown in the Report on file with the City Clerk.

7. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED May 23, 2023 .
_______________________
KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:
__________________________
ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1683

HOLIDAY PARK

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
2023‐24

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
City Council Meeting
May 23, 2023
Agenda Item 16.1
1684
Holiday Park Maintenance District
2023‐24 Annual Assessment
History• 1968: City acquired parcel on Kermit Lane in Stockton. • 1969: City formed Holiday Park Maintenance District.
• Surrounding 304 parcels assessed for operation and
maintenance costs.
• March 21, 2019: Holiday Park Recreation Association informed the City of their intent to end the lease agreement.
• May 19, 2019: City assumed operation and maintenance for Holiday Park Pool.
1685
Holiday Park Maintenance District
2023‐24 Annual Assessment
Facility: Hours of Operation:• Pool (with separate tot pool) Open Swim:
• Restrooms Tuesday‐Sunday 1‐6 pm• Parking lot Family Swim:
• Fencing Tuesday – Sunday 6‐8pm• Equipment shed
1686
Holiday Park Maintenance District
2023‐24 Annual Assessment
2022 Swim Season (May 29 – September 6)• 4,647 swims, second most of City used pool. • Stockton Fire Department uses for water safety training 1687
Holiday Park Maintenance District
2023‐24 Annual Assessment
Assessment:• $46,598 since 1996.• Assessment pays for chemicals, repairs, maintenance, landscaping and insurance.
• No change to assessment rate for 2023‐24.
• Additional $116,735 is needed for pool maintenance and operation.
• A Strong Communities Fund appropriation has been included in the 2023‐24 Community Services Department budget
1688
Holiday Park Maintenance District
2023‐24 Annual Assessment
Recommendation:• Hold a public hearing on $46,598 proposed 2023‐24 assessment • Adopt resolution to:
• Approve 2023‐24 assessment
• Authorize CFO to assess the parcels• Authorize a subsidy of $116,735 from the Strong Communities Fund (5025‐000‐210)
1689
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0275, Version: 1

APPROVE A FINDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION

INTENDING TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AND AN ORDINANCE

AMENDING THE STOCKTON CITYWIDE ZONING MAP FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE

GENERAL PLAN AND STATE LAW

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Find no further environmental review is required per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 (Consistency with a Community Plan or General Plan); and

2. Approve a Resolution amending the Stockton General Plan Land Use Map for multiple properties; and

3. Adopt an Ordinance amending the Citywide Zoning Map for multiple properties.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of these approvals.

Summary
The City adopted a new General Plan in 2018, and from 2020 to 2022, the City Council has approved e numerous amendments to the City’s General Plan Land Use Map, Citywide Zoning Map, and Development Code (zoning) to align with the General Plan, in accordance with State regulation. The approved amendments affected 4,223 properties and required City staff to perform significant outreach with property owners. Staff identified 116 additional properties that require amendment to correct existing split land use designations and address requests from property owners that were potentially affected by the initial zoning consistency approvals and desire to improve the usability of their property.

Since 2022, staff has been in contact with dozens of property owners who have indicated support for the changes due to a pending project relying on the changes, more usability of the property, or removing a split designation, all at the City’s expense. A neighborhood meeting was conducted on March 23, 2023, with each owner receiving a bilingual (English, Spanish) notice to attend. Only one owner attended and voiced support for the change. On April 13, 2023, the Planning Commission considered and approved by a unanimous vote, a recommendation for Council’s approval of the proposed amendments.

City of Stockton Page 1 of 4 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1690
File #: 23-0275, Version: 1

DISCUSSION
Background
The Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan is one of the most important policy documents for the City, establishing how residents, business owners, property owners, and other stakeholders would like to see the City develop and grow. Zoning is a tool used to implement the General Plan by applying standards to each property based on the established General Plan Land Use ("GPLU") Designation, such as Commercial or Residential. State law (California Government Code Section 65860) requires that these two documents be consistent with realizing the community vision.

In 2020, staff identified thousands of properties that had an inconsistency in their General Plan or Zoning designation and dozens of areas of the Development Code that required updates to align with changes in State Law, best practices, or the adopted General Plan policies. To ensure consistency, the City has pursued incremental amendments to the Zoning and General Plan maps (Series) and Development Code (Phases). As of July 2022, the City Council approved three sets of Series and Phased amendments.

After the July amendments, staff discovered approximately 102 additional sites with split General Plan land use and zoning map designations. In example, split General Plan land use and zoning designations may consist of a 1-acre property that has Commercial, General zoning and Commercial General Plan land use designation on one half of the property, and Industrial, Limited zoning designation and Industrial General Plan land use designation on the other half of the property. This poses a problem for the City to apply development standards on the property which are different for commercial as compared to industrial designations. The removal of the split designations will create greater clarity for staff and assurance for the property as to the type of development that could occur on the property. In addition, 14 property owners that were included in the earlier General Plan/zoning consistency process requested additional amendments to their properties to improve the usability of the site.

Present Situation
The proposed map amendments update the zoning of 116 properties to match their adopted General Plan Land Use Designation (Attachment A - Proposed Property Amendment List). Many of these proposed changes can be grouped into the following categories:
· Split Designation: Properties that contain more than one General Plan Land Use designation and/or Zoning designation. Of the proposed 116 proposed properties, 102 have some sort of split designation (i.e., General Plan land use or zoning) inconsistency.

Property Owner-requested: 14 Property owners have expressed interest in modifying their General Plan Land Use and/or Zoning to maximize development potential or align with surrounding uses. Eight of those sites were included in the 2022 amendments as the owner comments were submitted too late before a change could be made. All owners have expressed support for the proposed changes either as part of the Series 3 effort in 2022 or in 2023 as part of the neighborhood meeting hosted by City staff on March 23, 2023.

As with the previous amendments, changes are needed to comply with State Law, provide clarity for City of Stockton Page 2 of 4 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1691
File #: 23-0275, Version: 1
the property owners, and accommodate current Best Practices.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The City Council is asked to approve the proposed amendments to the GPLU Map and Zoning Map based on the following analysis:

General Plan and Zoning Consistency
In addition to having General Plan land use and zoning consistency issue, split designations can limit a property owners’ ability to use their property as all applicable zoning standards must be applied to the section of the property with that designation. For smaller sites this can be troublesome as sometimes conflicting zoning standards would have to be applied to the same parcel (Attachment B and C Proposed Maps). The owner requested sites will either align the proposed zoning designation with the historic use of the property (i.e., residential or commercial) or allow the owner to seek more flexible land uses to improve the marketability and usability of the sites. This means changes could allow property owners to build more on their parcel, lease or sell to additional users, or remove development barriers due to the existing zoning of the property. The Supportive General Plan policies specific to the proposed amendments include:
· Action LU-6.6D Review and update the Zoning District Map to ensure consistency with the updated General Plan.
· Policy LU-6.2 Prioritize development and redevelopment of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas.
· Policy LU-1.1 Encourage retail businesses and housing development in mixed-use developments along the region.

Due to Government Code Section 63558(b) of the California Code limits the City to four (4) General Plan Amendments annually, City staff intends to consolidate the proposed City-Initiated General Plan Amendment with another proposed General Plan Amendment as one amendment approval to be heard by the City Council under a separate item at a later hearing. That consolidated amendment will be noticed in the Record and presented to the City Council after the Council has taken action on the other proposed General Plan Amendment.

Environmental Analysis
The proposed amendments do not require further environmental analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15183 for projects which are consistent with the development impacts established by a Community Plan, General Plan, or zoning for which an environmental impact report (“EIR”) has been certified. The General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR) was prepared and certified by the City Council as part of the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan adoption process (SCH# 2017052062).

There are ±83,327 total properties within the City Limits and the amendments account for only 0.15% of all properties within the City Limits programmatically analyzed in the GPEIR. The proposed amendments will not result in a physical change to the properties nor decrease the number of properties designated towards meeting the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).

City of Stockton Page 3 of 4 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1692
File #: 23-0275, Version: 1
None of the potential changes being considered by the Commission will impact the analysis or conclusions of the GPEIR as the proposed amendments will correct zoning inconsistencies and align designations with the existing and/or surround land uses. In addition, tribal consultation was completed consistent with State law for proposed General Plan amendments. Future development proposals based on the amendments would be reviewed case-by-case for consistency with this review and the GPEIR.

Public Outreach
Since 2022, staff has been in contact with dozens of property owners who have indicated support for the changes due to a pending project relying on the changes, more usability of the property, or removing a split designation. Since a General Plan and/or Zoning map designation can cost between $5,000 and $10,000 to process, all of the owners who reached out to the City expressed support for City initiated changes to correct or improve the useability of the site. The proposed map changes were also posted on the City’s Shape Stockton website in September 2022 and shown to numerous residents as part of the Land Inventory process to identify housing capacity sites for the City’s Housing Element Update. The Land Inventory process had public workshops in September 2022 and February 2023, with all owners receiving bilingual notices (English, Spanish).

In addition to the Land Inventory workshops, all property owners were sent bilingual mailed notices (English, Spanish) regarding the proposed changes for a March 23, 2023, Neighborhood Meeting hosted by City staff on the proposed amendments (Attachment D - Neighborhood Meeting Notice).

One property owner attended and voiced support for the changes to allow him to develop more residential units on his property. Notice for the City Council public hearing for this request was published in The Record on May 12, 2023. The mailed notice was sent to all property owners with property potentially affected by the proposed Ordinance at least ten days prior to the hearing. As of the publication of this report, no written comments have been received.

Planning Commission
On April 13, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider making a recommendation on the proposed General Plan and Zoning map amendments to the City Council.

One letter of support was submitted to be read into the record (Attachment E), while two property owners who attended voiced their support to staff for the proposed changes. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed amendments to City Council (Attachment F).

Fiscal Impact
There would be no fiscal impact as a result of approving the proposed amendments. Future projects would be required to submit to the applicable processes for building permits, licenses, or entitlements. Relevant permitting fees would be paid to the city by future applicants.

Attachment A - Proposed Property Amendment List
Attachment B - Proposed General Plan Land Use Maps of Properties Attachment C - Proposed Zoning Maps of Properties
Attachment D - Neighborhood Meeting Notice
Attachment E - Planning Commission Support Letter
Attachment F - Planning Commission Approved Resolution
City of Stockton Page 4 of 4 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1693
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34

A B C D E F G H
ApnText
General Plan
Neighborhood Address Existing GP Proposed GP Existing Zoning Proposed
Zoning Reason
9811003 Brookside/Country Club 6727 CUMBERLAND PL LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone/Lincoln Village 10020041 Brookside/Country Club 3500 W BENJAMIN HOLT MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/Lincoln Village
Condos
11628001 Brookside/Country Club 3536 BROOKVIEW DR C C CG/RL CG Split Zone/Brookside
Clubhouse
11714016 East Stockton 1800 N WILSON WY C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 11727025 East Stockton 1604 N WILSON WY C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Homekey
Hotel
14109033 East Stockton 2054 E FLORA ST STOCKTON CA 95205 IND IND IL/IG IL Split Zone/Industrial
Building
15102303 East Stockton 1326 E HARDING WY C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Business
15102304 East Stockton 1346 E HARDING WY LDR C RL/CG CG Split Zone/Commercial
Business
15107211 East Stockton -no addresses on property- HDR HDR RH/RM RH Split Zone/Parking Lot 15107609 East Stockton 1431 E PARK ST HDR HDR RH/RM RH
Split Zone/Residential
Building
15116017 East Stockton
1119 CHANNEL ST STOCKTON CA
95205 INT C PF CN
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15304022 East Stockton
84 N WILSON WY STOCKTON CA
95205 ROW IND ROW IL
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15310211 East Stockton 2075 E MAIN ST C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
15310213 East Stockton 2065 E MAIN ST C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Existing
Church
15312003 East Stockton
1960 E MINER AV STOCKTON CA
95205 ROW IND ROW IL
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15313016 East Stockton
2040 E FREMONT ST STOCKTON CA
95205 IND IND IG/IL IL
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
15327031 East Stockton
2475 EAST MINER AVENUE
STOCKTON, CA 95205 IND MDR IL/RM RM
Split Zone/Owner
Requested
15535005 East Stockton 2250 E MAIN ST MDR C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Vacant Lot
with SFR
6808013 Eight Mile/ Bear Creek 10711 THORNTON RD AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone/The Commons
on Thorton
16707029 Industrial Annex
2402 S CALIFORNIA ST F STOCKTON
CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Industrial Site
17745002 Industrial Annex 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95206 ROW IND ROW IG Owner Requested 17746025 Industrial Annex 1456 SPERRY RD C IND CG IG
Owner Request/Due to
ALUC
17926063 Industrial Annex 3665 METRO DR IND IND IL/CG IL Split Zone/Industrial
Building
17746024 Industrial Annex 4607 S AIRPORT WY C IND CG IG Owner Request/Due to
ALUC
11332007 Midtown 2737 PACIFIC AV HDR HDR RH/RL RH Split Zone/Church 11335420 Midtown 2344 BEVERLY PL LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/House 11336307 Midtown 227 DORRIS PL LDR C RL CN
Split GPLU/Commercial
Facility
11336401 Midtown 2041 PACIFIC AV C C CN/RL CN
Split Zone /Commercial
Facility
11511505 Midtown 4133 N EL DORADO ST C C CN/RL CN Split Zone 12521001 Midtown 108 BLAIN AV MDR MDR RM/CN RM Split Zone/Existing Duplex 12536004 Midtown
2020 MARSHALL AV STOCKTON CA
95204 ROW HDR ROW RH
Owner Request/RJ Rail
Property next to existing
HDR Rail property
12702005 Midtown 145 W WYANDOTTE ST LDR C RL/GC CN
Split Zone/Mirale Mile
Parking Lot
12702025 Midtown 1926 PACIFIC AV C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Miracle Mile
Commercial
ATTACHMENT A 1694
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 A B C D E F G H
12702026 Midtown 1906 PACIFIC AV C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Miracle Mile
Commercial
12715053 Midtown 415 E HARDING WY AP AP CO/CG CO Split Zone/Existing Office 12717216 Midtown 1901 N CALIFORNIA ST AP AP CO/RM CO Split Zone/Existing Office 12719032 Midtown 1800 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone/St. Joes 12724012 Midtown 1805 N CALIFORNIA ST MDR AP RM/CO CO
Split Designation/Existing
Office
13509007 Midtown 1626 CORNELL CT ROW AP ROW CO Series 3 Fix 13715421 Midtown 530 W ACACIA ST AP AP CO/RL CO
Split Zone/Dameron
Hospital
13715509 Midtown 445 W ACACIA ST AP AP CO/RL CO
Split Zone/Dameron
Hospital
13715510 Midtown 1032 N LINCOLN ST AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone /Office 13902063 Midtown 1301 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone/Church 13903008 Midtown 1236 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13903045 Midtown 1130 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Existing
Commercial
13903046 Midtown 1140 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13903061 Midtown 1149 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13904002 Midtown 1031 N EL DORADO ST G C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13904006 Midtown 1040 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905102 Midtown 845 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905104 Midtown 807 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905203 Midtown 747 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN Split Zone/Parking lot 13917314 Midtown 809 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone 13917406 Midtown 729 N CALIFORNIA ST 5 C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13917518 Midtown 826 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone 13917410 Midtown 427 E PARK ST AP C CO CG Owner Request 10407036
Morada/ Holman
Neighborhood 5370 CARRINGTON CI HDR HDR RH/CO RH
Split Zone /Rivewrwood
Healthcare Center
07742023
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1001 W LINCOLN RD MDR MDR RM/RL RM
Split Zone/Lincoln Square
Condominium
08102006
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 7620 N EL DORADO ST 1 HDR HDR RH/RL RH
Split Zone/Oakwood
Apartments
08134601
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5 W SWAIN RD AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone/Mayfair
08152046
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 445 SAN CARLOS WY SIGN AP AP CO/CG CO Split Zone/Mission Park 09729029
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1691 W SWAIN RD 6 LDR HDR RL/RH RH
Split Zone/Stamford
Court Apartments
10220006
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 72 W YORKSHIRE DR HDR HDR RH/RL RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220027
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village -no addresses on property- MDR HDR RH RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220036
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 42 W LANCASTER DR HDR HDR RH/RM RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220037
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 44 W YORKSHIRE DR MDR HDR RM/RH RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
ATTACHMENT A 1695
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100

A B C D E F G H
10220075
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 39 W LANCASTER DR LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone
10224019
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 321 W YOKUTS AV C C CL/RL CL
Split Zone/Sherwood Mall
Parking Lot
10224022
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5400 PACIFIC AV C C CL/RL CL
Split Zone/Sherwood Mall
Parking Lot
10802004
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5600 ALEXANDRIA PL MDR MDR RM/RL RM
Split Zone /Flora Arca
Mata Elementary
10813024
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5757 PACIFIC AV A120 C C CL/CO CL
Split Zone/StoneCreek
Village
11011007
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 2323 GRAND CANAL BL AP AP CO/CG CO
Split Zone/Stockton
Hilton
11020312
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1105 EL MONTE ST LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone /Home 11227018
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 4901 GROUSE RUN DR MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/QuailBrook 14708215 South Stockton
353 W DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
14708216 South Stockton
309 W DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
14726313 South Stockton 407 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL HDR C RH/CG CG Split
Designation/Commercial
Building
14734112 South Stockton
619 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
BL HDR C RH/RM CN Split Zone
14909108 South Stockton 333 S SUTTER ST STOCKTON CA 95203 C C CG/CD CG Split Zone/Commercial
Building
15133504 South Stockton 1426 E WORTH ST MDR MDR RM/CG RM Split Zone/Existing Home 15511002 South Stockton 1022 S WILSON WY C C IL/CG CG Split Zone/Existing Hotel 15511003 South Stockton 1025 BIEGHLE AL ROW IND ROW IG
Split Zone/Series 3 Carry
Over
15512018 South Stockton
1747 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL
STOCKTON CA 95205 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16507435 South Stockton 20 W FOURTH ST C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16508017 South Stockton 5 W FIFTH ST C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16517083 South Stockton 547 W SEVENTH ST LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone/Existing
Church
16518127 South Stockton 2314 TURNPIKE RD MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/Existing SFR 16523041 South Stockton 2543 S EL DORADO ST 70 LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/Existing
Mobilehomes
16536023 South Stockton 2233 S EL DORADO ST LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/Vacant Lot 16702317 South Stockton 1411 S HUNTER ST C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 16702503 South Stockton 1415 S SAN JOAQUIN ST LDR C RL/CG CG Split Zone/Commercial
with SFR Building
16702514 South Stockton
210 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
BL C C CG/RL CG Split Zone
16715060 South Stockton 302 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 16715061 South Stockton
544 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16718303 South Stockton 930 E DR MARTIN LUTHER C C CG/IL/IG CG Split Zone/Vacant Lot 17306031 South Stockton 3120 E FARMINGTON RD C C CL CG Owner Request 17513045 South Stockton
3417 S EL DORADO ST STOCKTON CA
95206 LDR C RL CG Owner Request
17513052 South Stockton
3515 S EL DORADO ST STOCKTON CA
95206 LDR C RL CG Owner Request
17513053 South Stockton 3531 S EL DORADO ST LDR C RL CG Owner Request ATTACHMENT A 1696
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117

A B C D E F G H
17918029 South Stockton 3801 S STATE ROUTE 99 W FR RD ROW PRI ROW PF Series 3 Carry
Over/Landscape Buffer
with 69kv line
15131012 South Stockton -no addresses on property- ROW IND ROW IL Owner Request 14523012
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront -no addresses on property- MDR C RM CG Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
14523013
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 800 W CHURCH ST MDR C RM CG
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
14526010
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
404 S STOCKTON ST STOCKTON, CA
95203 MDR C RM CG
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
16334002
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 1624 ARMY CT STOCKTON CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16334008
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 1681 ARMY CT STOCKTON CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16334009
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2441 W CHARTER WY STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336012
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2121 W CHARTER WY STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336013
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
1677 TILLIE LEWIS DR STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336017
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2245 W CHARTER WY C STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
06603001
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton
5412 PASADENA DR STOCKTON CA
95219 LDR PRI PF/RL PF Split zone/Levee ROW
06603004
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton -no addresses on property- PRI PRI PF/MX PF Split zone/Faklis Park 06603006
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 OSA OSA OS/MX OS Split zone/Levee ROW 07126010
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton 8225 MARINERS DR MDR MDR RM/RH RM Split zone/Mariners Point 08227007
Upper Hammer Lane/
Thorton Road 8121 DON AVE LDR LDR RL/RM RL
Split zone/Creative
Childcare
16306023 Weston/Van Buskirk 1880 W CHARTER WY IND IND IL/RL IL Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
ATTACHMENT A 1697
ATTACHMENT B 1698
ATTACHMENT B 1699
ATTACHMENT B 1700
ATTACHMENT B 1701
ATTACHMENT B 1702
ATTACHMENT B 1703
ATTACHMENT B 1704
ATTACHMENT B 1705
ATTACHMENT B 1706
ATTACHMENT B 1707
ATTACHMENT B 1708
ATTACHMENT B 1709
ATTACHMENT B 1710
ATTACHMENT B 1711
ATTACHMENT B 1712
ATTACHMENT B 1713
ATTACHMENT C 1714
ATTACHMENT C 1715
ATTACHMENT C 1716
ATTACHMENT C 1717
ATTACHMENT C 1718
ATTACHMENT C 1719
ATTACHMENT C 1720
ATTACHMENT C 1721
ATTACHMENT C 1722
ATTACHMENT C 1723
ATTACHMENT C 1724
ATTACHMENT C 1725
ATTACHMENT C 1726
ATTACHMENT C 1727
ATTACHMENT C 1728
ATTACHMENT C 1729

CIUDAD DE STOCKTON

AVISO DE CAMBIOS DE USO DE SUELOS INICIADOS POR LA CIUDAD Estimado propietario,
La Ciudad de Stockton se basa en el Plan General, el Mapa de Uso de Suelo del Plan General, el Mapa de Zonificación de la Ciudad y el Código de Desarrollo para regular el desarrollo para mantener un crecimiento ordenado e implementar los objetivos de la comunidad. La ley estatal y el Plan General requieren que estos elementos sean consistentes. Para garantizar esta consistencia, la Ciudad de Stockton pasó años trabajando con los propietarios para hacer numerosas enmiendas a esos documentos. Si bien estas enmiendas concluyeron en 2022, el personal de la Ciudad ha recibido comentarios adicionales de los propietarios y descubrió algunas propiedades restantes que requieren una corrección de consistencia. Usted está recibiendo este aviso porque el personal de la Ciudad está investigando una posible inconsistencia en una propiedad que used posiblemente es dueño.

Esta actualizaciónse centra en garantizar que el Mapa de Zonificación coincida con el mapa de uso de la suelo del Plan General abordando problemas técnicos, como correcciones de mapas como zonas divididas o ajustes para mejorar la usabilidad del sitio. Estas actualizaciones mantendrán las reglas que se aplican a la mayoría de las propiedades en la Ciudad. El personal de la ciudad tiene la intención de comunicarse con propietarios como usted para obtener comentarios y para comunicarle de una junta comunitaria programada para el 23 de Marzo, 2023 a las 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m., Cesar Chavez Library, 605 N. El Dorado Street, Stockton, CA 95202 para discutir. Dirija todas sus preguntas o comentarios a Matt Diaz, Gerente de Planificación Avanzada.

Visite www.stocktonca.gov/ZoningUpdates
Email [email protected]
Llame (209) 937-8598

CITY OF STOCKTON

NOTICE OF CITY-INITIATED LAND USE CHANGES
Dear Property Owner,
The City of Stockton relies on the General Plan, the General Plan Land Use Map, the Citywide Zoning Map, and the Development Code to regulate development to maintain orderly growth and implement the community’s goals. State law and the General Plan require these items to be consistent with each other. To ensure this consistency, the City of Stockton spent years working with property owners to make numerous amendments to those documents. While these amendments concluded in 2022, City staff has received additional owner feedback and discovered some remaining properties that require a consistency correction.

You are receiving this notice because City staff is investigating a possible inconsistency on a property you may own.

This update focuses on ensuring that the Zoning Map matches the General Plan land use map by addressing technical issues, such as map corrections for split zones or adjustments to improve the site’s usability. These updates will keep the rules that apply to most properties in the City. City staff intends to reach out to owners like yourself for feedback at a neighborhood meeting on March 23, 2023, 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. at the Cesar Chavez Library, 605 N. El Dorado Street, Stockton, CA 95202. Please direct all questions or comments to Matt Diaz, Advanced Planning Manager.

Visit www.stocktonca.gov/ZoningUpdates
Email [email protected]
Call (209) 937-8598
ATTACHMENT D 1730
ATTACHMENT E 1731
ATTACHMENT F 1732
ATTACHMENT F 1733
ATTACHMENT F 1734
ATTACHMENT F 1735
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN

LAND USE MAP FOR MULTIPLE PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY In 2016, the Stockton City Council directed City staff to overhaul the 2035 General Plan to better align the community vision with expected growth patterns for the next twenty years. After years of community outreach and analysis, the City Council adopted the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan ("General Plan") on December 4, 2018; and As required by State Law (Gov. Code § 65860), the City must amend its Zoning Code (Title 16 Development Code), development standards, and Zoning Map to be consistent with the General Plan; and
In 2020, City staff identified thousands of properties with inconsistencies between the General Plan or Zoning. Due to the significant level of analysis and outreach necessary to make informed recommendations on the inconsistency, Staff proposed a series of amendments to correct these Inconsistencies; and From 2020 to 2022, the City of Stockton made numerous amendments to the City’s General Plan Land Use Map, Citywide Zoning Map, and Development Code (zoning) to align with the General Plan and changes to State Law: and After the amendments were adopted, City Staff identified 128 additional properties that required further amendments due to a split General Plan or zoning designation of the site and/or owner requests to improve the usability of the property further: and On March 23, 2023, the City hosted a neighborhood meeting for affected owners in an effort to receive feedback on the proposed amendments. Currently, no comments for or against the project have been received; and
On April 13, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Section 16.116.040(D), and voted 6-0 (Jones Absent) recommending the City Council approve the proposed map amendments; and Government Code Section 63558(b) of the California Code limits the City to four (4) General Plan Amendments annually; and
To accommodate development and other General Plan amendments requested for the calendar year, the City will consolidate the proposed City-Intitaed General Plan Amendment with another proposed General Plan Amendment as one amendment approval to be heard by the City Council under a separate item at a later hearing. That consolidated amendment will be noticed in the Record and presented to the City Council 1736
after the Council has taken action on the other proposed General Plan Amendment; and On May 23, 2023, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Section 16.116.040(D), to consider the proposed map amendments, at which all times all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Pursuant to SMC section 16.116.050(B), the City Council makes the following Mandatory Findings of Fact for General Plan Land Use Map Amendments:
a) The proposed amendment ensures and maintains internal consistency with general land uses, objectives, policies, programs, and actions of all elements of the General Plan on balance and would not create any inconsistencies with this Development Code.

Evidence: The purpose ofthe proposed City initiated amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map is to maintain consistency between both maps. The proposed amendments include rezones to create consistency with the General Plan Land Use Map and changes to the General Plan Land Use Map to create consistency with the Zoning Map where staff determined it was more appropriate to support the existing underlying use of a parcel. None of the proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map will create inconsistencies with the Development Code, and will in fact the proposed changes will make it easier to apply the Development Code by aligning the General Plan and zoning land use designation of parcels. Future development will need to comply with all applicable zoning and development standards as well as all building and fire regulations for health and safety.

The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map maintain consistency and are supported by the following General Plan policies:
 Action LU-6.6D Review and update the Zoning District Map to ensure consistency with the updated General Plan.
 Policy LU-6.2 Prioritize development and redevelopment of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas.
 Policy LU-1.1 Encourage retail businesses and housing development in mixed-use developments along the region.
b) The proposed amendment will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the City.
1737
Evidence: The purpose of the proposed City initiated amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map is to maintain consistency between both maps. The proposed amendments include rezones to create consistency with the General Plan Land Use Map and changes to the General Plan Land Use Map to create consistency with the Zoning Map where staff determined it was more appropriate to support the existing underlying use of a parcel and surrounding properties. The proposed map consistency changes to 116 parcels are intended to support and strengthen the existing underlying uses of these parcels and make it easier to apply the Development Code standards and and all building and fire regulations on future development uses of these parcels, and as a result will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to public health and safety. c) The proposed amendment complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines.

Evidence: The proposed amendments do not require further environmental analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per section 15183 for projects which are consistent with the development impacts established by a Community Plan, General Plan, or zoning for which an environmental impact report (“EIR”) has been certified. The GPEIR was prepared and certified by the City Council as part of the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan process (SCH# 2017052062).

There are approximately 83,327 total properties within the City Limits and the amendments account for only 0.15% of all properties within the City Limits programmatically analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The proposed amendments will not result in a physical change to the properties nor decrease the number of properties designated towards meeting the City’s RHNA. None of the potential changes being considered by the Commission will impact the analysis or conclusions of the GPEIR as the proposed amendments will correct zoning inconsistencies and align designations with the existing and/or surround land uses.

In addition, tribal consultation was completed consistent with State law for proposed General Plan amendments. Future development proposals based on the amendments would be reviewed case-by-case for consistency with this review and the GPEIR.

2. Pursuant to Government Code section 65863, the City may not reduce the residential density for any parcel to a lower residential density unless it makes written findings supported by substantial evidence of both of the following:
a) The reduction is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the housing element.

Evidence: None of the proposed amendment sites in listed in the 2015-2023 Housing Element as a property needed towards meeting the City's fair share of Regional Housing Needs Allocation ("RHNA").
1738
b) The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The finding shall include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate that need by income level.

Evidence: The "no net loss" provision of Government Code section 65683 requires that certain findings be made if the City reduces residential density on any property to a lower residential density. The proposed amendments will not decrease the number of properties available to provide new housing as many are existing residential and nonresidential uses, or amended to reflect the current or surrounding uses on the property.

3. The City Council hereby finds no further environmental analysis is required beyond the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report per CEQA section 15183 and adopts a Resoltuon amending the Stockton General Plan Land Use Map as shown in Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2, attached hereto.

4. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent to this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED May 23, 2023 .

KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1739
EXHIBIT 1 1740
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34

A B C D E F G H
ApnText
General Plan
Neighborhood Address Existing GP Proposed GP Existing Zoning Proposed
Zoning Reason
9811003 Brookside/Country Club 6727 CUMBERLAND PL LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone/Lincoln Village 10020041 Brookside/Country Club 3500 W BENJAMIN HOLT MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/Lincoln Village
Condos
11628001 Brookside/Country Club 3536 BROOKVIEW DR C C CG/RL CG Split Zone/Brookside
Clubhouse
11714016 East Stockton 1800 N WILSON WY C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 11727025 East Stockton 1604 N WILSON WY C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Homekey
Hotel
14109033 East Stockton 2054 E FLORA ST STOCKTON CA 95205 IND IND IL/IG IL Split Zone/Industrial
Building
15102303 East Stockton 1326 E HARDING WY C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Business
15102304 East Stockton 1346 E HARDING WY LDR C RL/CG CG Split Zone/Commercial
Business
15107211 East Stockton -no addresses on property- HDR HDR RH/RM RH Split Zone/Parking Lot 15107609 East Stockton 1431 E PARK ST HDR HDR RH/RM RH
Split Zone/Residential
Building
15116017 East Stockton
1119 CHANNEL ST STOCKTON CA
95205 INT C PF CN
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15304022 East Stockton
84 N WILSON WY STOCKTON CA
95205 ROW IND ROW IL
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15310211 East Stockton 2075 E MAIN ST C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
15310213 East Stockton 2065 E MAIN ST C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Existing
Church
15312003 East Stockton
1960 E MINER AV STOCKTON CA
95205 ROW IND ROW IL
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15313016 East Stockton
2040 E FREMONT ST STOCKTON CA
95205 IND IND IG/IL IL
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
15327031 East Stockton
2475 EAST MINER AVENUE
STOCKTON, CA 95205 IND MDR IL/RM RM
Split Zone/Owner
Requested
15535005 East Stockton 2250 E MAIN ST MDR C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Vacant Lot
with SFR
6808013 Eight Mile/ Bear Creek 10711 THORNTON RD AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone/The Commons
on Thorton
16707029 Industrial Annex
2402 S CALIFORNIA ST F STOCKTON
CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Industrial Site
17745002 Industrial Annex 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95206 ROW IND ROW IG Owner Requested 17746025 Industrial Annex 1456 SPERRY RD C IND CG IG
Owner Request/Due to
ALUC
17926063 Industrial Annex 3665 METRO DR IND IND IL/CG IL Split Zone/Industrial
Building
17746024 Industrial Annex 4607 S AIRPORT WY C IND CG IG Owner Request/Due to
ALUC
11332007 Midtown 2737 PACIFIC AV HDR HDR RH/RL RH Split Zone/Church 11335420 Midtown 2344 BEVERLY PL LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/House 11336307 Midtown 227 DORRIS PL LDR C RL CN
Split GPLU/Commercial
Facility
11336401 Midtown 2041 PACIFIC AV C C CN/RL CN
Split Zone /Commercial
Facility
11511505 Midtown 4133 N EL DORADO ST C C CN/RL CN Split Zone 12521001 Midtown 108 BLAIN AV MDR MDR RM/CN RM Split Zone/Existing Duplex 12536004 Midtown
2020 MARSHALL AV STOCKTON CA
95204 ROW HDR ROW RH
Owner Request/RJ Rail
Property next to existing
HDR Rail property
12702005 Midtown 145 W WYANDOTTE ST LDR C RL/GC CN
Split Zone/Mirale Mile
Parking Lot
12702025 Midtown 1926 PACIFIC AV C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Miracle Mile
Commercial
EXHIBIT 2 1741
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 A B C D E F G H
12702026 Midtown 1906 PACIFIC AV C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Miracle Mile
Commercial
12715053 Midtown 415 E HARDING WY AP AP CO/CG CO Split Zone/Existing Office 12717216 Midtown 1901 N CALIFORNIA ST AP AP CO/RM CO Split Zone/Existing Office 12719032 Midtown 1800 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone/St. Joes 12724012 Midtown 1805 N CALIFORNIA ST MDR AP RM/CO CO
Split Designation/Existing
Office
13509007 Midtown 1626 CORNELL CT ROW AP ROW CO Series 3 Fix 13715421 Midtown 530 W ACACIA ST AP AP CO/RL CO
Split Zone/Dameron
Hospital
13715509 Midtown 445 W ACACIA ST AP AP CO/RL CO
Split Zone/Dameron
Hospital
13715510 Midtown 1032 N LINCOLN ST AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone /Office 13902063 Midtown 1301 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone/Church 13903008 Midtown 1236 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13903045 Midtown 1130 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Existing
Commercial
13903046 Midtown 1140 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13903061 Midtown 1149 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13904002 Midtown 1031 N EL DORADO ST G C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13904006 Midtown 1040 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905102 Midtown 845 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905104 Midtown 807 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905203 Midtown 747 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN Split Zone/Parking lot 13917314 Midtown 809 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone 13917406 Midtown 729 N CALIFORNIA ST 5 C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13917518 Midtown 826 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone 13917410 Midtown 427 E PARK ST AP C CO CG Owner Request 10407036
Morada/ Holman
Neighborhood 5370 CARRINGTON CI HDR HDR RH/CO RH
Split Zone /Rivewrwood
Healthcare Center
07742023
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1001 W LINCOLN RD MDR MDR RM/RL RM
Split Zone/Lincoln Square
Condominium
08102006
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 7620 N EL DORADO ST 1 HDR HDR RH/RL RH
Split Zone/Oakwood
Apartments
08134601
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5 W SWAIN RD AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone/Mayfair
08152046
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 445 SAN CARLOS WY SIGN AP AP CO/CG CO Split Zone/Mission Park 09729029
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1691 W SWAIN RD 6 LDR HDR RL/RH RH
Split Zone/Stamford
Court Apartments
10220006
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 72 W YORKSHIRE DR HDR HDR RH/RL RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220027
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village -no addresses on property- MDR HDR RH RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220036
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 42 W LANCASTER DR HDR HDR RH/RM RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220037
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 44 W YORKSHIRE DR MDR HDR RM/RH RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
EXHIBIT 2 1742
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100

A B C D E F G H
10220075
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 39 W LANCASTER DR LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone
10224019
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 321 W YOKUTS AV C C CL/RL CL
Split Zone/Sherwood Mall
Parking Lot
10224022
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5400 PACIFIC AV C C CL/RL CL
Split Zone/Sherwood Mall
Parking Lot
10802004
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5600 ALEXANDRIA PL MDR MDR RM/RL RM
Split Zone /Flora Arca
Mata Elementary
10813024
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5757 PACIFIC AV A120 C C CL/CO CL
Split Zone/StoneCreek
Village
11011007
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 2323 GRAND CANAL BL AP AP CO/CG CO
Split Zone/Stockton
Hilton
11020312
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1105 EL MONTE ST LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone /Home 11227018
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 4901 GROUSE RUN DR MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/QuailBrook 14708215 South Stockton
353 W DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
14708216 South Stockton
309 W DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
14726313 South Stockton 407 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL HDR C RH/CG CG Split
Designation/Commercial
Building
14734112 South Stockton
619 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
BL HDR C RH/RM CN Split Zone
14909108 South Stockton 333 S SUTTER ST STOCKTON CA 95203 C C CG/CD CG Split Zone/Commercial
Building
15133504 South Stockton 1426 E WORTH ST MDR MDR RM/CG RM Split Zone/Existing Home 15511002 South Stockton 1022 S WILSON WY C C IL/CG CG Split Zone/Existing Hotel 15511003 South Stockton 1025 BIEGHLE AL ROW IND ROW IG
Split Zone/Series 3 Carry
Over
15512018 South Stockton
1747 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL
STOCKTON CA 95205 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16507435 South Stockton 20 W FOURTH ST C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16508017 South Stockton 5 W FIFTH ST C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16517083 South Stockton 547 W SEVENTH ST LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone/Existing
Church
16518127 South Stockton 2314 TURNPIKE RD MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/Existing SFR 16523041 South Stockton 2543 S EL DORADO ST 70 LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/Existing
Mobilehomes
16536023 South Stockton 2233 S EL DORADO ST LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/Vacant Lot 16702317 South Stockton 1411 S HUNTER ST C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 16702503 South Stockton 1415 S SAN JOAQUIN ST LDR C RL/CG CG Split Zone/Commercial
with SFR Building
16702514 South Stockton
210 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
BL C C CG/RL CG Split Zone
16715060 South Stockton 302 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 16715061 South Stockton
544 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16718303 South Stockton 930 E DR MARTIN LUTHER C C CG/IL/IG CG Split Zone/Vacant Lot 17306031 South Stockton 3120 E FARMINGTON RD C C CL CG Owner Request 17513045 South Stockton
3417 S EL DORADO ST STOCKTON CA
95206 LDR C RL CG Owner Request
17513052 South Stockton
3515 S EL DORADO ST STOCKTON CA
95206 LDR C RL CG Owner Request
17513053 South Stockton 3531 S EL DORADO ST LDR C RL CG Owner Request EXHIBIT 2 1743
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117

A B C D E F G H
17918029 South Stockton 3801 S STATE ROUTE 99 W FR RD ROW PRI ROW PF Series 3 Carry
Over/Landscape Buffer
with 69kv line
15131012 South Stockton -no addresses on property- ROW IND ROW IL Owner Request 14523012
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront -no addresses on property- MDR C RM CG Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
14523013
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 800 W CHURCH ST MDR C RM CG
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
14526010
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
404 S STOCKTON ST STOCKTON, CA
95203 MDR C RM CG
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
16334002
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 1624 ARMY CT STOCKTON CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16334008
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 1681 ARMY CT STOCKTON CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16334009
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2441 W CHARTER WY STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336012
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2121 W CHARTER WY STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336013
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
1677 TILLIE LEWIS DR STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336017
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2245 W CHARTER WY C STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
06603001
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton
5412 PASADENA DR STOCKTON CA
95219 LDR PRI PF/RL PF Split zone/Levee ROW
06603004
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton -no addresses on property- PRI PRI PF/MX PF Split zone/Faklis Park 06603006
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 OSA OSA OS/MX OS Split zone/Levee ROW 07126010
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton 8225 MARINERS DR MDR MDR RM/RH RM Split zone/Mariners Point 08227007
Upper Hammer Lane/
Thorton Road 8121 DON AVE LDR LDR RL/RM RL
Split zone/Creative
Childcare
16306023 Weston/Van Buskirk 1880 W CHARTER WY IND IND IL/RL IL Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
EXHIBIT 2 1744
ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STOCKTON CITYWIDE ZONING MAP FOR MULTIPLE

PROPERTIES THROUGHTOUT THE CITY TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH THE ENVISION STOCKTON 2040 GENERAL PLAN

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND INTENT
Pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) section 16.116.050(B), the City Council makes the following mandatory Findings of Fact:
a) The proposed amendment ensures and maintains internal consistency with general land uses, objectives, policies, programs, and actions of all elements of the General Plan on balance and would not create any inconsistencies with this Development Code.

Evidence: The purpose ofthe proposed City initiated amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map is to maintain consistency between both maps. The proposed amendments include rezones to create consistency with the General Plan Land Use Map and changes to the General Plan Land Use Map to create consistency with the Zoning Map where staff determined it was more appropriate to support the existing underlying use of a parcel. None of the proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map will create inconsistencies with the Development Code, and will in fact the proposed changes will make it easier to apply the Development Code by aligning the General Plan and zoning land use designation of parcels. Future development will need to comply with all applicable zoning and development standards as well as all building and fire regulations for health and safety.

The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map maintain consistency and are supported by the following General Plan policies:
 Action LU-6.6D Review and update the Zoning District Map to ensure consistency with the updated General Plan.
 Policy LU-6.2 Prioritize development and redevelopment of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas.
 Policy LU-1.1 Encourage retail businesses and housing development in mixed-use developments along the region.
b) The proposed amendment will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the City.
1745
Evidence: The purpose of the proposed City initiated amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map is to maintain consistency between both maps. The proposed amendments include rezones to create consistency with the General Plan Land Use Map and changes to the General Plan Land Use Map to create consistency with the Zoning Map where staff determined it was more appropriate to support the existing underlying use of a parcel and surrounding properties. The proposed map consistency changes to 116 parcels are intended to support and strengthen the existing underlying uses of these parcels and make it easier to apply the Development Code standards and and all building and fire regulations on future development uses of these parcels, and as a result will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to public health and safety. c) The proposed amendment complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines.

Evidence: The proposed amendments do not require further environmental analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per section 15183 for projects which are consistent with the development impacts established by a Community Plan, General Plan, or zoning for which an environmental impact report (“EIR”) has been certified. The GPEIR was prepared and certified by the City Council as part of the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan process (SCH# 2017052062).

There are approximately 83,327 total properties within the City Limits and the amendments account for only 0.15% of all properties within the City Limits programmatically analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The proposed amendments will not result in a physical change to the properties nor decrease the number of properties designated towards meeting the City’s RHNA. None of the potential changes being considered by the Commission will impact the analysis or conclusions of the GPEIR as the proposed amendments will correct zoning inconsistencies and align designations with the existing and/or surround land uses.

In addition, tribal consultation was completed consistent with State law for proposed General Plan amendments. Future development proposals based on the amendments would be reviewed case-by-case for consistency with this review and the GPEIR.
d) Additional Finding for Zoning Map Amendments. The site(s) would be physically suitable (including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested zoning designation(s) and anticipated land use development(s).

Evidence: The proposed Zoning Map Amendments and General Plan Map Amendments create land use consistencies for 116 properties and improve the physical suitability of projerties that have existing land uses. This proposed Zoning Map and General Plan Map amendment will provide greater certainty for applying the Development Code standards and building and fire regulations as 1746
future land development occurs on the identified properties contained in the amendment.
e) Pursuant to Government Code section 65863, the City may not reduce the residential density for any parcel to a lower residential density unless it makes written findings supported by substantial evidence of both of the following:

1. The reduction is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the housing element.

Evidence: None of the proposed amendment sites in listed in the 2015-2023 Housing Element as a property needed to meet the City's fair share of Regional Housing Needs Allocation ("RHNA").

2. The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need pursuant to section 65584. The finding shall include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate that need by income level.

Evidence: The "no net loss" provision of Government Code section 65683 requires that certain findings be made if the City reduces residential density on any property to a lower residential density. The proposed amendments will not decrease the number of properties available to provide new housing as many are existing residential and nonresidential uses, or amended to reflect the current or surrounding uses on the property.

SECTION II. PREZONE CLASSIFICATION
That the Zoning Map, particularly referred to in SMC section 16.16.030, and by reference made a part hereof, said Code is hereby amended as shown on Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2, attached and incorporporated herein by reference.

SECTION III. SEVERABILITY
If any part of this Ordinance is held invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance, and the City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance, if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted.
//
//
//
//
//
1747
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days after its passage.

ADOPTED:

EFFECTIVE:

KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1748
EXHIBIT 1 1749
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34

A B C D E F G H
ApnText
General Plan
Neighborhood Address Existing GP Proposed GP Existing Zoning Proposed
Zoning Reason
9811003 Brookside/Country Club 6727 CUMBERLAND PL LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone/Lincoln Village 10020041 Brookside/Country Club 3500 W BENJAMIN HOLT MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/Lincoln Village
Condos
11628001 Brookside/Country Club 3536 BROOKVIEW DR C C CG/RL CG Split Zone/Brookside
Clubhouse
11714016 East Stockton 1800 N WILSON WY C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 11727025 East Stockton 1604 N WILSON WY C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Homekey
Hotel
14109033 East Stockton 2054 E FLORA ST STOCKTON CA 95205 IND IND IL/IG IL Split Zone/Industrial
Building
15102303 East Stockton 1326 E HARDING WY C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Business
15102304 East Stockton 1346 E HARDING WY LDR C RL/CG CG Split Zone/Commercial
Business
15107211 East Stockton -no addresses on property- HDR HDR RH/RM RH Split Zone/Parking Lot 15107609 East Stockton 1431 E PARK ST HDR HDR RH/RM RH
Split Zone/Residential
Building
15116017 East Stockton
1119 CHANNEL ST STOCKTON CA
95205 INT C PF CN
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15304022 East Stockton
84 N WILSON WY STOCKTON CA
95205 ROW IND ROW IL
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15310211 East Stockton 2075 E MAIN ST C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
15310213 East Stockton 2065 E MAIN ST C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Existing
Church
15312003 East Stockton
1960 E MINER AV STOCKTON CA
95205 ROW IND ROW IL
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
15313016 East Stockton
2040 E FREMONT ST STOCKTON CA
95205 IND IND IG/IL IL
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
15327031 East Stockton
2475 EAST MINER AVENUE
STOCKTON, CA 95205 IND MDR IL/RM RM
Split Zone/Owner
Requested
15535005 East Stockton 2250 E MAIN ST MDR C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Vacant Lot
with SFR
6808013 Eight Mile/ Bear Creek 10711 THORNTON RD AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone/The Commons
on Thorton
16707029 Industrial Annex
2402 S CALIFORNIA ST F STOCKTON
CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Industrial Site
17745002 Industrial Annex 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95206 ROW IND ROW IG Owner Requested 17746025 Industrial Annex 1456 SPERRY RD C IND CG IG
Owner Request/Due to
ALUC
17926063 Industrial Annex 3665 METRO DR IND IND IL/CG IL Split Zone/Industrial
Building
17746024 Industrial Annex 4607 S AIRPORT WY C IND CG IG Owner Request/Due to
ALUC
11332007 Midtown 2737 PACIFIC AV HDR HDR RH/RL RH Split Zone/Church 11335420 Midtown 2344 BEVERLY PL LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/House 11336307 Midtown 227 DORRIS PL LDR C RL CN
Split GPLU/Commercial
Facility
11336401 Midtown 2041 PACIFIC AV C C CN/RL CN
Split Zone /Commercial
Facility
11511505 Midtown 4133 N EL DORADO ST C C CN/RL CN Split Zone 12521001 Midtown 108 BLAIN AV MDR MDR RM/CN RM Split Zone/Existing Duplex 12536004 Midtown
2020 MARSHALL AV STOCKTON CA
95204 ROW HDR ROW RH
Owner Request/RJ Rail
Property next to existing
HDR Rail property
12702005 Midtown 145 W WYANDOTTE ST LDR C RL/GC CN
Split Zone/Mirale Mile
Parking Lot
12702025 Midtown 1926 PACIFIC AV C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Miracle Mile
Commercial
EXHIBIT 2 1750
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 A B C D E F G H
12702026 Midtown 1906 PACIFIC AV C C CG/RM CG
Split Zone/Miracle Mile
Commercial
12715053 Midtown 415 E HARDING WY AP AP CO/CG CO Split Zone/Existing Office 12717216 Midtown 1901 N CALIFORNIA ST AP AP CO/RM CO Split Zone/Existing Office 12719032 Midtown 1800 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone/St. Joes 12724012 Midtown 1805 N CALIFORNIA ST MDR AP RM/CO CO
Split Designation/Existing
Office
13509007 Midtown 1626 CORNELL CT ROW AP ROW CO Series 3 Fix 13715421 Midtown 530 W ACACIA ST AP AP CO/RL CO
Split Zone/Dameron
Hospital
13715509 Midtown 445 W ACACIA ST AP AP CO/RL CO
Split Zone/Dameron
Hospital
13715510 Midtown 1032 N LINCOLN ST AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone /Office 13902063 Midtown 1301 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone/Church 13903008 Midtown 1236 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13903045 Midtown 1130 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Existing
Commercial
13903046 Midtown 1140 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13903061 Midtown 1149 N EL DORADO ST A C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13904002 Midtown 1031 N EL DORADO ST G C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13904006 Midtown 1040 N EL DORADO ST C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905102 Midtown 845 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905104 Midtown 807 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13905203 Midtown 747 N EL DORADO ST C C CD/CO CN Split Zone/Parking lot 13917314 Midtown 809 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone 13917406 Midtown 729 N CALIFORNIA ST 5 C C CG/CO CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
13917518 Midtown 826 N CALIFORNIA ST C C CG/CO CG Split Zone 13917410 Midtown 427 E PARK ST AP C CO CG Owner Request 10407036
Morada/ Holman
Neighborhood 5370 CARRINGTON CI HDR HDR RH/CO RH
Split Zone /Rivewrwood
Healthcare Center
07742023
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1001 W LINCOLN RD MDR MDR RM/RL RM
Split Zone/Lincoln Square
Condominium
08102006
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 7620 N EL DORADO ST 1 HDR HDR RH/RL RH
Split Zone/Oakwood
Apartments
08134601
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5 W SWAIN RD AP AP CO/RL CO Split Zone/Mayfair
08152046
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 445 SAN CARLOS WY SIGN AP AP CO/CG CO Split Zone/Mission Park 09729029
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1691 W SWAIN RD 6 LDR HDR RL/RH RH
Split Zone/Stamford
Court Apartments
10220006
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 72 W YORKSHIRE DR HDR HDR RH/RL RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220027
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village -no addresses on property- MDR HDR RH RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220036
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 42 W LANCASTER DR HDR HDR RH/RM RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
10220037
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 44 W YORKSHIRE DR MDR HDR RM/RH RH
Split
Designation/Sherwood
Village Apartments
EXHIBIT 2 1751
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100

A B C D E F G H
10220075
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 39 W LANCASTER DR LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone
10224019
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 321 W YOKUTS AV C C CL/RL CL
Split Zone/Sherwood Mall
Parking Lot
10224022
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5400 PACIFIC AV C C CL/RL CL
Split Zone/Sherwood Mall
Parking Lot
10802004
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5600 ALEXANDRIA PL MDR MDR RM/RL RM
Split Zone /Flora Arca
Mata Elementary
10813024
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 5757 PACIFIC AV A120 C C CL/CO CL
Split Zone/StoneCreek
Village
11011007
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 2323 GRAND CANAL BL AP AP CO/CG CO
Split Zone/Stockton
Hilton
11020312
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 1105 EL MONTE ST LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone /Home 11227018
Pacific Avenue/ Lincoln
Village 4901 GROUSE RUN DR MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/QuailBrook 14708215 South Stockton
353 W DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
14708216 South Stockton
309 W DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
14726313 South Stockton 407 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL HDR C RH/CG CG Split
Designation/Commercial
Building
14734112 South Stockton
619 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
BL HDR C RH/RM CN Split Zone
14909108 South Stockton 333 S SUTTER ST STOCKTON CA 95203 C C CG/CD CG Split Zone/Commercial
Building
15133504 South Stockton 1426 E WORTH ST MDR MDR RM/CG RM Split Zone/Existing Home 15511002 South Stockton 1022 S WILSON WY C C IL/CG CG Split Zone/Existing Hotel 15511003 South Stockton 1025 BIEGHLE AL ROW IND ROW IG
Split Zone/Series 3 Carry
Over
15512018 South Stockton
1747 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL
STOCKTON CA 95205 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16507435 South Stockton 20 W FOURTH ST C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16508017 South Stockton 5 W FIFTH ST C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16517083 South Stockton 547 W SEVENTH ST LDR LDR RL/RM RL Split Zone/Existing
Church
16518127 South Stockton 2314 TURNPIKE RD MDR MDR RM/RL RM Split Zone/Existing SFR 16523041 South Stockton 2543 S EL DORADO ST 70 LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/Existing
Mobilehomes
16536023 South Stockton 2233 S EL DORADO ST LDR LDR RL/CG RL Split Zone/Vacant Lot 16702317 South Stockton 1411 S HUNTER ST C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 16702503 South Stockton 1415 S SAN JOAQUIN ST LDR C RL/CG CG Split Zone/Commercial
with SFR Building
16702514 South Stockton
210 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
BL C C CG/RL CG Split Zone
16715060 South Stockton 302 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BL C C CG/RL CG Split Zone 16715061 South Stockton
544 E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR

BL C C CG/RL CG
Split Zone/Commercial
Building
16718303 South Stockton 930 E DR MARTIN LUTHER C C CG/IL/IG CG Split Zone/Vacant Lot 17306031 South Stockton 3120 E FARMINGTON RD C C CL CG Owner Request 17513045 South Stockton
3417 S EL DORADO ST STOCKTON CA
95206 LDR C RL CG Owner Request
17513052 South Stockton
3515 S EL DORADO ST STOCKTON CA
95206 LDR C RL CG Owner Request
17513053 South Stockton 3531 S EL DORADO ST LDR C RL CG Owner Request EXHIBIT 2 1752
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117

A B C D E F G H
17918029 South Stockton 3801 S STATE ROUTE 99 W FR RD ROW PRI ROW PF Series 3 Carry
Over/Landscape Buffer
with 69kv line
15131012 South Stockton -no addresses on property- ROW IND ROW IL Owner Request 14523012
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront -no addresses on property- MDR C RM CG Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
14523013
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 800 W CHURCH ST MDR C RM CG
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
14526010
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
404 S STOCKTON ST STOCKTON, CA
95203 MDR C RM CG
Owner Request/Series 3
Carry Over
16334002
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 1624 ARMY CT STOCKTON CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16334008
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront 1681 ARMY CT STOCKTON CA 95206 IND IND IG/IL IG Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16334009
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2441 W CHARTER WY STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336012
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2121 W CHARTER WY STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336013
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
1677 TILLIE LEWIS DR STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
16336017
The Port and Mount
Diablo Waterfront
2245 W CHARTER WY C STOCKTON CA
95206 IND IND IG/IL IG
Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
06603001
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton
5412 PASADENA DR STOCKTON CA
95219 LDR PRI PF/RL PF Split zone/Levee ROW
06603004
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton -no addresses on property- PRI PRI PF/MX PF Split zone/Faklis Park 06603006
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 OSA OSA OS/MX OS Split zone/Levee ROW 07126010
Trinity/Northwest
Stockton 8225 MARINERS DR MDR MDR RM/RH RM Split zone/Mariners Point 08227007
Upper Hammer Lane/
Thorton Road 8121 DON AVE LDR LDR RL/RM RL
Split zone/Creative
Childcare
16306023 Weston/Van Buskirk 1880 W CHARTER WY IND IND IL/RL IL Split Zone/Existing
Industrial Building
EXHIBIT 2 1753

CITY-INITIATED GENERAL PLAN

AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS
Stockton City Council
Agenda Item 16.2
May 23, 2023
1754
• 2007- General Plan Adopted but did not update
zoning
• 2018 - New 2040 General Plan Adopted
• 2019 - State law now requires Charter Cities to have
General Plan-Zoning consistency
• 2020 to 2022 - numerous general plan map, zoning
map, and zoning text changes were made
• Since 2022, more split designations have been
discovered
• 4/13/23 The Planning Commission unanimously
voted to recommend approval of the proposed
changes
Background
1755
Map amendments for 116 properties that
include:
• 102 properties with split General Plan land
use and/or zoning designations
• 14 Property owner requested changes
• 8 properties included in the 2022 amendments
but requested changes.

Current Request
1756
What is “Consistency”?
1757
Examples of “Split Designation”
IL
IG
IL
IG
CG RL
RL
CG
1758
Examples of “Owner Requested”

CG CGRL
CG
RL
RL
IL
1759
Guiding Principles for Changes

SUSTAINABLE GROWTH &

PUBLIC HEALTH

STRENGTHEN PROPERTY RIGHTS

STREAMLINE HIGH-QUALITY

DEVELOPMENT
1760
• Some owners were part of the 2022
changes
• Interactive online map available for
property owners to review changes
• Mailers sent to all property owners
• Neighborhood Meeting held on 3/23/23
• Notices posted in the Record
• Owners expressed support at the Planning
Commission Meeting
Overall Outreach
1761
Summary
• Removal of split designations would maximize the
useability of identified properties while
implementing General Plan Policies
• Corrections for inconsistencies needed for General
Plan and State Law compliance
• No further environmental review is required.

Proposed sites consistent with General Plan
buildout projections.
1762
Recommendation
Staff Recommends that City Council:
• Find no further environmental review is needed per
CEQA Section 15183; and
• Approve a Resolution amending the Stockton
General Plan Land Use Map; and
• Approve an Ordinance amending the Stockton
Citywide Zoning Map
1763
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0360, Version: 1
PUBLIC HEARING TO ACCEPT THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY 2022 ANNUAL REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council, by motion:

1. Accept the Economic Development Subsidy 2022 Annual Report, which includes all subsidies the City has provided to developers for economic development purposes over $100,000; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.

Summary
Effective January 1, 2014, California Government Code Section 53083 (Attachment A) requires local governments to report any economic development subsidy exceeding $100,000, and to provide specific information to the public before approving any economic development subsidy of $100,000 or more. The City is compliant with these requirements and provides information to the public through reports to the City Council on a per-project basis for City programs. The statute also requires a report to be provided to the public on an annual basis. The first report must be provided no later than five years after the action granting an economic development subsidy. The City provided $16,165,494 in eligible subsidies (over $100,000 per subsidy) for the calendar year of 2022.

Background
On October 11, 2013, Assembly Bill (AB) 562 - Chapter 740 was approved by Governor Brown and became effective January 1, 2014. The bill created a new section of the Government Code requiring local governments to report on any economic development subsidy over $100,000. The term “economic development subsidy” is defined as any expenditure of public funds or loss of revenue to a local agency in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more, for the purpose of stimulating economic development within the jurisdiction of a local agency, including, but not limited to, bonds, grants, loans, loan guarantees, enterprise zone or empowerment zone incentives, fee waivers, land price subsidies, matching funds, tax abatements, tax exemptions, and tax credits.

Affordable housing projects do not require economic development subsidy reporting.

The following information is required by AB 562:

Before approval of subsidy

1. The name and address of all corporations or any other business entities, except for sole City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1764
File #: 23-0360, Version: 1
proprietorships, that are the beneficiary of the economic development subsidy, if applicable.

2. The start and end dates and schedule, if applicable, for the economic development subsidy

3. A description of the economic development subsidy, including the estimated total amount of the expenditure of public funds by, or of revenue lost to, the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy.

4. A statement of the public purposes for the economic development subsidy.

5. Projected tax revenue to the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy.

6. Estimated number of jobs created by the economic development subsidy, broken down by fulltime, part-time, and temporary positions.

This information is provided to the public through reports to the City Council on a per-project basis.

Within five years after granting subsidy:

1. The name and address of all corporations or any other business entities, except for sole proprietorships, that are the beneficiary of the economic development subsidy, if applicable.

2. The start and end dates and schedule for the economic development subsidy.

3. A description of the economic development subsidy, including the estimated total amount of the expenditure of public funds by, or of revenue lost to, the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy.

4. The net tax revenue accruing to the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy.

5. The net number of jobs created by the economic development subsidy, broken down by fulltime, part-time, and temporary positions.

This information is provided to the public through the annual Economic Development Subsidy Report.

Present Situation
Local agencies are required to provide an annual report of all economic development subsidies no later than five (5) years after the action granting an economic development subsidy. The City has prepared the 2022 Annual Report (Attachment B) to meet statutory requirements.

The 2022 Annual Report indicates that the City provided approximately $16.16 million in economic subsidies for “qualifying” criteria, which includes projects that received over $100,000 in economic development subsidy and are either bonds, grants, loans, loan guarantees, enterprise zone or empowerment zone incentives, fee waivers, land price subsidies, matching funds, tax abatement, tax exemptions, and tax credits.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1765
File #: 23-0360, Version: 1
The City Programs that require reporting on the annual AB 562 report are:
· Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP) Program
· Public Facility Fee Reduction to Non-Residential Projects · Greater Downtown Stockton Residential Development Public Facilities Fee Exemption · Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program
· Office and Industrial Sales Tax Incentive Program
Financial Summary
Total 2022 subsidies are as follows:

Program Eligible
Subsidies
Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP) $8,347,598
(Single-family)
Public Facility Fee (PFF) Reduction for Nonresidential Projects$3,771,981 Greater Downtown Stockton Residential
Development Public Facilities Exemption
-
Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program -
Office and Industrial Sales Tax Incentive Program $4,045,9154 TOTAL $16,165,494
There is no financial impact with the filing of the Economic Development Subsidy 2022 Annual Report. However, during the 2022 calendar year, the City provided $16,165,494 in eligible subsidies (over $100,000 per subsidy).

Public Notice
A public hearing notice was published in the Stockton Record on May 9, 2023. To date, no comments have been received.

Attachment A - Government Code 53083
Attachment B - Economic Development Subsidy 2022 Annual Report City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 5/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1766
State of California

GOVERNMENT CODE
Section 53083
53083. (a) On and after January 1, 2014, each local agency shall, before approving any economic development subsidy within its jurisdiction, provide all of the following information in written form available to the public, and through its Internet Web site, if applicable:
(1) The name and address of all corporations or any other business entities, except for sole proprietorships, that are the beneficiary of the economic development subsidy, if applicable.
(2) The start and end dates and schedule, if applicable, for the economic development subsidy.
(3) A description of the economic development subsidy, including the estimated total amount of the expenditure of public funds by, or of revenue lost to, the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy. (4) A statement of the public purposes for the economic development subsidy. (5) Projected tax revenue to the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy.
(6) Estimated number of jobs created by the economic development subsidy, broken down by full-time, part-time, and temporary positions.
(b) Before granting an economic development subsidy, each local agency shall provide public notice and a hearing regarding the economic development subsidy. A public hearing and notice under this subdivision is not required if a hearing and notice regarding the economic development subsidy is otherwise required by law. (c) The information required to be provided in subdivision (a) shall remain available to the public under existing state and federal law and be posted on the local agency’s Internet Web site, if applicable, for the entire term of the economic development subsidy.
(d) The local agency, within the term of the economic development subsidy but not later than five years after the action granting an economic development subsidy, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), shall issue a report for each economic development subsidy. The report shall contain the information described in subdivision (a). The local agency shall make the report available to the public and through its Internet Web site, if applicable. The report shall also contain the following information, if applicable:
(1) The name and address of all corporations or any other business entities, except for sole proprietorships, that are the beneficiary of the economic development subsidy, if applicable.
(2) The start and end dates and schedule for the economic development subsidy.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AUTHENTICATED

ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL
ATTACHMENT A 1767
(3) A description of the economic development subsidy, including the estimated total amount of the expenditure of public funds by, or of revenue lost to, the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy. (4) The net tax revenue accruing to the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy.
(5) The net number of jobs created by the economic development subsidy, broken down by full-time, part-time, and temporary positions.
(e) (1) The local agency, within the term of the economic development subsidy but no later than five years after the action granting an economic development subsidy, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), shall hold a public hearing to consider any written or oral comments on the information contained in the report prepared pursuant to subdivision (d).
(2) For an economic development subsidy, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), with a term of 10 years or more, the local agency shall hold a public hearing at the conclusion of each economic development subsidy that shall contain the information described in subdivision (d), in written form available to the public, and through its Internet Web site, if applicable.
(f) Each public hearing required by this section shall be consolidated with a local agency’s regularly scheduled hearing.
(g) As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1) “Economic development subsidy” means any expenditure of public funds or loss of revenue to a local agency in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more, for the purpose of stimulating economic development within the jurisdiction of a local agency, including, but not limited to, bonds, grants, loans, loan guarantees, enterprise zone or empowerment zone incentives, fee waivers, land price subsidies, matching funds, tax abatements, tax exemptions, and tax credits. “Economic development subsidy” shall not include expenditures of public funds by, or loss of revenue to, the local agency for the purpose of providing housing affordable to persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2) “Local agency” means a city, including a charter city, county, or city and county.
(Added by Stats. 2013, Ch. 740, Sec. 1. (AB 562) Effective January 1, 2014.) ATTACHMENT A 1768
APRIL 2023

CITY OF STOCKTON

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT

SUBSIDY

ANNUAL REPORT
2022
Attachment B
1769
Attachment B
2 | Page
Table of Contents
2022 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY ANNUAL REPORT ....................................... 3 QUALIFYING CITY PROGRAMS.................................................................................. 3 STOCKTON ECONOMIC STIMULUS PLAN (SESP).................................................................................................3 PUBLIC FACILITY FEE (PFF) REDUCTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS.......................................................5 GREATER DOWNTOWN STOCKTON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC FACILITIES EXEMPTION .................7 DOWNTOWN INFILL INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM ...........................................................................................7 OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL SALES TAX INCENTIVE PROGRAM..............................................................................8 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 9 1770
Attachment B
3 | Page
2022 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY ANNUAL REPORT
The purpose of the Economic Development Subsidy Report is to fulfill the annual reporting requirements as outlined in California Assembly Bill 562. Effective January 1, 2014, Assembly Bill 562 (Williams), chapter 740, added section 53083 to the Government Code, which requires local agencies to annually report subsidies for economic development purposes. Government Code §53083 requires the report to include identifiable information (name & address) of each business entity that is a beneficiary of a subsidy, description of each program and total amount of the expenditure of public funds or of revenue lost as a result of the subsidy, statement of public purpose of the subsidy, net tax revenue as a result of the subsidy, and estimated number of jobs created by the subsidy.

An “economic development subsidy” is defined as any expenditure of public funds or loss of revenue to a local agency in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more, for the purpose of stimulating economic development within the jurisdiction of a local agency, including, but not limited to, bonds, grants, loans, loan guarantees, enterprise zone or empowerment zone incentives, fee waivers, land price subsidies, matching funds, tax abatements, tax exemptions, and tax credits. Furthermore, “economic development subsidy” shall not include expenditures of public funds by, or loss of revenue to, the local agency for the purpose of providing housing affordable to persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.

This report will provide the necessary information for the qualifying programs to remain in compliance with Assembly Bill 562.

QUALIFYING CITY PROGRAMS
City Programs that provide “economic development subsidies” as defined by Assembly Bill 562 include:

1. Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP)

2. Public Facility Fee (PFF) Reduction for Non-residential Projects

3. Greater Downtown Stockton Residential Development Public Facilities Exemption

4. Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program

5. Office and Industrial Sales Tax Incentive Program

STOCKTON ECONOMIC STIMULUS PLAN (SESP)
In November of 2015, City Council adopted Resolution 2015-11-17-1602 – Stockton Economic Stimulus Program (SESP)superseding existing PFF reduction programs for residential and non-residential projects.

The program launched in January 2016 to reduce eligible PFFs on qualifying single-family residential, multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial projects in the City of Stockton. In July 2018, City Council passed Resolution 2018-07-17-1302 to extend SESP for residential & non-residential projects and increase developer permit limitations in non-disadvantage areas. 1771
Attachment B
4 | Page
SESP eliminates/waives the following PFF categories:

PFF Category Residential Commercial / Industrial
City Office Space  
Libraries  
Fire Stations  
Parkland 
Community Recreation Centers  
Police Stations  
Street Improvements  
City Office Space, Community Recreation Centers, Libraries, Police Stations, Fire Stations, Street Improvements, and Parks are reduced to a total of $19,997 or 100%, whichever is less, for single-family residential, $14,080 per unit for multi-family residential, and 50% reduction for commercial & industrial projects.

For single-family residential, multi-family residential, and non-residential (commercial/industrial) permits issued citywide for builders/developers must comply with the terms of the program.

Participation in the single-family residential component of SESP requires a developer to comply with the local hire and disadvantaged individual requirements. Participants must agree to the program conditions to receive the incentives of the program for residential development. Additionally, only units within the existing City limits as described in the 2008 General Plan Settlement Agreement are eligible to meet the local hire requirement of the program. The commercial/industrial component, formerly the Public Facilities Fee Reduction Program (established in 2010), was incorporated into the SESP program in 2015; reporting of local hiring is not a requirement.

The SESP program will remain in place until the City conducts a nexus study for the Public Facility Fees (Development Impact Fee) program and adopts new fees per motion 2019-08-20-1405. 3%2%2%
7%
22%
18% 11%
15%
14%
1%
4%
SESP - Single-family Fees Waived 2022
Affordable Luxury Homes - 3%
D.R. HORTON CA2 INC - 2%
Florsheim Homes - 2%
K. Hovnanian California Operations Inc - 7%
KB Homes - 22%
Lennar Homes of California - 11%
LGI Homes-California LLC - 18%
Meritage Homes California - 15%
Richmond American Homes - 14%
Trinity Development & Construction - 1%
Fees Waived < $100k - 4%
1772
Attachment B
5 | Page
Reciepient that received $100,000 or greater:

SESP Single-family Fee Waiver Recipients 2022

AFFORDABLE LUXURY HOMES
5711 N. EL DORADO ST.

STOCKTON, CA 95207
$230,952
D.R. HORTON
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD., STE 110
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
$211,706

FLORSHEIM HOMES
1701 W. MARCH LN., STE D
STOCKTON, CA 95207
$192,460
K. HOVNANIAN CALIFORNIA OPERATIONS INC.
3721 DOUGLAS BLVD., STE 130
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
$635,118

KB HOMES
4830 BUSINESS CENTER DR., STE 150
FAIRFIELD, CA 94535
$1,924,600
LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA INC.
15131 ALTON PKWY #345
IRVINE, CA 92618
$923,808

LGI HOMES-CALIFORNIA LLC
2251 DOUGLAS BLVD., STE 110
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
$1,592,252
MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA INC.
860 STILLWATER RD., STE 200A
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95605
$1,270,236

RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES
1 HARBOR CENTER, STE 100
SUISUN CITY, CA 94585
$1,250,990
TRINITY DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION INC.
119 E WEBER AVE
STOCKTON, CA 95202
$115,476
Total Single-family $8,347,598
Multi-family SESP participants did not exceed the $100,000 threshold, therefore no reporting is required per AB 562.

Net Tax Revenue Accrued as a Result of Subsidy – Not applicable.

Number of Jobs Created by Subsidy – 4,880 (2,590 Stockton Residents)

PUBLIC FACILITY FEE (PFF) REDUCTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS On September 14, 2010, the City Council adopted resolution #10-0308 which authorized the reduction of fees for residential and non-residential projects. The program was extended and evolved with adoption and extension of the SESP program in 2019. The PFF Reduction to Non-Residential Projects program will remain in place until the City conducts a nexus study for the Public Facility Fees (Development Impact Fee) program and adopts new fees.
1773
Attachment B
6 | Page
For non-residential new development, the following Public Facilities Fees shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%) citywide. The following fee categories apply:
• City Office Space
• Community Recreation Centers
• Libraries
• Fire Stations
• Police Stations
• Street Improvements
Recipients that received $100,000 or greater:

Recipients Amount
2222 SINCLAIR OWNER LP
19700 S VERMONT AVENUE, STE 101
TORRANCE, CA 90502
$533,920.38

ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
1001 22ND AVENUE, STE 100
OAKLAND, CA 94606
$179,929.59

BARANOF HOLDINGS LAND DEVELOPMENT
2850 N. HARWOOD STREET, STE 1000
DALLAS, TX 75201
$121,996.78
BUZZ OATES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
555 CAPITOL MALL, STE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
$140,742.72
DPML ARCH RD. LLC
5500 EQUITY AVENUE
RENO, NV 89502
$308,851.54

DPML MARIPOSA ROAD LLC
5500 EQUITY AVENUE
RENO, NV 89502
$563,811.64
FIRST INDUSTRIAL LP $620,563.99
13%
4%
3%
4%
8%
14%
15%
20%
9%
3%
6%
Non-Residential Public Facility Fee
Reduction
2222 Sinclair Owner LP - 13%
Aspire Public School - 4%
Baranof Holding Land Development - 3%
Buzz Oates Construction, Inc. - 4%
DPML Arch R. LLC - 8%
DPML Arch R. LLC - 14%
First Industrial LP - 15%
MC Shane Construction Company LLC - 20%
Niagara Bottling, LLC - 9%
SAFStor Turnpike, LLC - 3%
Fees Waived < $100k - 6%
1774
Attachment B
7 | Page
ONE N. WACKER DRIVE, STE 4200
CHICAGO, IL 60606

MC SHANE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LLC
9500 W BRYAN MAWR AVENUE, STE 200
ROSEMONT, IL 60018
$804,965.26

NIAGARA BOTTLING, LLC
1440 BRIDGEGATE DRIVE
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
$371,834.38

SAFSTOR TURNPIKE, LLC
444 SEABREEZE BL, STE 840
DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32118
$125,364.80
TOTAL $3,771,981.08
Net Tax Revenue Accrued as a Result of Subsidy – Not applicable.

Number of Jobs Created by Subsidy – Not applicable.

GREATER DOWNTOWN STOCKTON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC FACILITIES

EXEMPTION
The Greater Downtown Stockton Residential Development Public Facilities Fees Exemption Program provides fee exemptions for qualifying residential developments within the greater downtown area to encourage housing production. The PFF Exemption Program will remain in place until the City conducts a nexus study for the Public Facility Fees (Development Impact Fee) program and adopts new fees.

Eligible development projects will receive an exemption for the following Public Facilities Fees (PFF) categories:
• City Office Space
• Libraries
• Fire Stations
• Parkland
• Community Recreation Centers
• Police Stations
• Street Improvements
There were no eligible subsidies to report in 2022.

Net Tax Revenue Accrued as a Result of Subsidy – Not applicable.

Number of Jobs Created by Subsidy – Not applicable.

DOWNTOWN INFILL INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM
The Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program provides a financial incentive to eligible parties interested in developing new market-rate residential, commercial, or mixed-use projects in Downtown Stockton. In Stockton’s downtown area, aging infrastructure, such as sewer and water lines, as well as the rehabilitation of older structures can significantly increase project costs and serve as barriers to infill development.
1775
Attachment B
8 | Page
Under the Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program, eligible development projects may receive a reimbursement for certain public infrastructure improvements. Examples of eligible public infrastructure improvements include sewer and water; storm drain; street improvements, including crosswalks, bike lanes, striping, and medians; traffic signals; streetlights; and landscaping.

To qualify for the program, the developer must meet these criteria:

1. Develop a minimum of 35 new market-rate residential units and/or develop a minimum of 30,000 square feet of new, or newly renovated retail or commercial space.

2. Be located within the program boundary, which includes Center Street to the west, Park Street to the north, ACE Rail/Union Pacific Railroad to the east, and Washington Street to the south.

3. Make a capital investment of at least $500,000.

4. Eligible public infrastructure improvements must equal $100,000 or more.

Applicants must submit a request for funding to the Economic Development Department for review and consideration. If deemed eligible under the program guidelines, a Reimbursement Agreement requiring Council approval will be executed between the City and applicant. The City will reimburse the applicant within six (6) months of completion of the public improvements included within the reimbursement agreement of up to $900,000 annually. The program was approved by Council on July 7, 2015, and is scheduled to sunset in July 2025.

During 2022, no applicants received an economic development subsidy under the Downtown Infill Program.

Net Tax Revenue Accrued as a Result of Subsidy – Not applicable.

Number of Jobs Created by Subsidy – Not applicable.

OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL SALES TAX INCENTIVE PROGRAM
The Office and Industrial Sales Tax Incentive Program provides an annual sales tax rebate to new or expanding office and industrial businesses located within Stockton city limits. Examples of the types of office and industrial businesses that would have been eligible under the program include eCommerce businesses, fuel distributors, high-tech equipment manufacturers or software developers, medical device manufacturers, and business-to-business sales. To qualify for the program, the business must have met the following criteria:

1. Generate net new annual gross taxable sales of $25 million or more.

2. Generate sales tax to the City corresponding with the gross sales tax amount.

3. Create a minimum of ten full-time equivalent jobs.

4. Make a capital investment of $50,000 or more.

The sales tax rebate is based on the annual net new sales tax revenue received by the city and is restricted to the Bradley-Burns tax. The rebate amount is based on the following tiers:
1776
Attachment B
9 | Page
Net New Sales Tax Revenue % of Sales Tax Revenue Rebated to the Business
% of Sales Tax Revenue
Retained by the City
Less than $250,000 0% 100%
$250,000 - $500,000 50% 50%
More than $500,000 65% 35%
Qualifying businesses must have executed an agreement with the City, which required Council approval.

The term of the agreement is 10 years, with options to extend for up to an additional 10 years.

This program was approved by Council on June 24, 2014, and sunset in June 2019 for new applications.

During 2022, four companies continued to receive subsidies under prior agreements. The 2022 subsidies for each company are as follows:

Recipients 2022

VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM
152 FRANK W CIR, STE 100
STOCKTON, CA 95206
$1,627,973

DIESEL DIRECT WEST
3861 DUCK CREEK DR
STOCKTON, CA 95215
$1,278,237

BED BATH AND BEYOND

BBBYCF, LLC
3610 S. AIRPORT WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95206
$1,139,705.22
TOTAL $4,045,915.22
During 2022, the City rebated more than $4,045,915.22 in net new sales tax revenue as a result of the Office and Industrial Sales Tax Incentive Program. A minimum of 40 full-time equivalent new jobs were created as a result of this program.

SUMMARY
City Programs that provided “economic development subsidies” in 2022 are as follows:

Program Eligible Subsidies

1. Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP) $8,347,598
(Single-family)

2. Public Facility Fee (PFF) Reduction for Non-residential Projects
$3,771,981

3. Greater Downtown Stockton Residential Development Public Facilities Exemption
-

4. Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program -

5. Office and Industrial Sales Tax Incentive Program $4,045,915 TOTAL $16,165,494
1777

CITY OF STOCKTON

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY
2022 ANNUAL REPORT
Agenda Item 16.3
May 23, 2023
City Council
Meeting
1778
Background
AB 562 effective January 1, 2014
Requires local governments
report economic development
subsidies over $100,000
Current Reporting Period – 2022
Comprehensive report of all
qualifying programs
1779
Qualifying Programs
( $100,000 Subsidy)
 Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP)
 Public Facility Fee Reduction for Nonresidential Projects  Greater Downtown Stockton Residential
Development Public Facilities Exemption
 Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program
 Office and Industrial Sales Tax Incentive
Program
1780
Eligible Programs
GRAND TOTAL FOR ELIGIBLE PROGRAMS = $16.2 MILLION
SESP PFF NonResidential Downtown Infill Sales Tax
Total Recipients 10 10 0 0 4
Subsidy $8,347,598 $3,771,981 $0 $0 $4,045,915
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
1781
2022
Employment Impacts
SESP recipients to hire
at least 50% Stockton
Residents
4,880 Jobs
(2,590 Stockton
Residents)
Job creation data tracking is not
required by the remaining reported
programs
1782
Staff Recommends
 Accept the Economic Development
Subsidy 2022 Annual Report; and
 Authorize the City Manager to take
appropriate and necessary action to
carry out the purpose and intent of
this motion.
1783