City Council and Concurrent Authorities
August 22, 2023

Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
PROF

ESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is entered into this day of 2023, between the CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal corporation (“City”), and SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. whose address is 3428 BROOKSIDE ROAD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 (“Consultant”) for the MARIPOSA ROAD PRECISE RO AD PLAN (PROJECT NO.

WT23032), hereinafter referred to as "Project".

RECITALS
A. Consultant represents that it is licensed in the State of California and is qualified to provide the services proposed in the SCOPE OF WORK section of this Contract.

B. City finds it necessary and advisable to use the services of the Consultant for the purposes provided in this Contract.

NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the mu tual promises, covenants, and conditions in this Contract, City and Consultant agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall undertake and complete the services described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A and compatible with the standards of the profession. Consultant agrees that it shall produce a fully complete project that is acceptable to the City.

2. COMPENSATION. City shall pay Consultant for services outlined in Exhibit A according to the fee not to exceed the schedule detailed in Exhibit B, which is attached to this Contract and incorporated by this refer ence. Consultant agrees this fee is for full remuneration for performing all services and furnishing all staffing and materials called for in the scope of services. The payments shall be made on a monthly basis upon receipt and approval of Consultant’s invoice. Total compensation for services and reimbursement for costs shall not exceed $968,800.00 or as otherwise mutually agreed to in a Contract Amendment.

3. INSURANCE. During the term of this Contract, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect at its own cost and expens e the insurance coverage as set forth in the attached Exhibit C and shall otherwise comply with the other provisions of Exhibit C.

4. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS. With the exception that this section shall in no event be construed to require indemnification by Consultant to a greater extent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California, Consultant shall

EXHIBIT 1
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)

indemnify, and hold harmless City, its Mayor, Council, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims and causes of acti on which result in liabilities, judgments, awards, losses, damages, expenses, and costs (including reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert and consultant fees, and other expenses of litigation) including, but not limited to, death or injury to persons, or damage to pr operty, which arise out of any violation of federal, state, or municipal law or ordinanc e, to the extent damages are caused by the Consultant’s negligent services provided under this Agreement, or are in any way caused by the negligent performance of work by the Consultant or Consultant’s officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors. Consultant s hall not be obligated to indemnify or defend City for claims finally determined by a court of law or arbitrator to arise from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City. It is the intent of the Parties that this indemnity obligation is at least as broad as is permitted under Califo rnia law. To the extent California Civil Code sections 2782, et seq., limit the defense or indemnity ob ligations of Consultant to City, the intent hereunder is to provide the maximum defense and indemnity obligations allowed by Consultant under the law. The indemnity set forth in this section shall not be limited by insurance requirements or by any other provision of this Agreement.

With the exception that this section shall in no event be construed to require indemnification by Consultant to a greater ex tent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California, and in addition to the other indem nity obligations in this Agreement, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its Mayor, Council, officials, representatives, and employees from and against claims, losses, expenses, and costs including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of any claim brought against the City by an employee of Consultant, regardless of whether such claim may be covered by any applicable workers compensation insurance.

Consultant’s indemnification obligation is not limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation, or benefits payable by or for the Consultant under workers’ compensation acts, disability acts, or other employee benefit acts.

5. SCHEDULE AND TERM. Consultant shall perform the scope of work as described in Exhibit A according to the schedule detailed in Exhibit D, which is attached to this Contract and incorporated by this reference. This Contract shall commence on the date written above and shall expire on September 30, 2028, unless extended by mutual agreement through the issuance of a Contract Amendment.

a. Invoices submitted by Consultant to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time used, and include the City project number. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of approval of invoice by City.

b. Upon completion of work and acceptanc e by City, Consultant shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitat ion. City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed whic h Consultant fails or neglects to

EXHIBIT 1
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)

submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after work is accepted by City.

6. CONFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE LAWS. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Consultant shall not discriminate in the employme nt of persons or in the prov ision of services under this Contract on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person.

a. TITLE VI

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that “no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits o f, or be subjected to discrimination under any pr ogram or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” (42 USC Section 2000d).
http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titlevi.htm .

The City of Stockton requires compliance with the requirements of Title VI in all of its programs and activities regardless of funding source.

b. DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT POLICY

The City of Stockton has a Discrimination and Harassment Policy Exhibit E. The purpose of this policy is to reaffirm the City’s commitment to demonstrating respect for all individuals by strictly prohibiting discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment in the workplace, to define the types of behavior and conduct prohibited by this policy, and to set forth a procedure for reporting, investigat ing, and resolving complaints of discrimination and harassment in the workplace.

c. LABOR STANDARDS PROVISIO NS/CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE

The bidder shall understand that conditions set forth in Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the California Labor C ode shall be considered part of the contract
agreement. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xht ml?lawCode=LAB&division=2.&title=&part=7.&chapter=1.&article=2.

d. PREVAILING WAGE RATES

Consultant and any subcontractor shall pay each employee engaged in the trade or occupation not less than the prevailing hourly wage rate. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 of the Labor Code, the Director of Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has

EXHIBIT 1
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
determined the general prevailing rate s of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, and subsistence pay as provided for in Section 1773.1, apprenticeship or other training programs authorized by Section 3093 and similar purpos es applicable to the work to be done. Consultant performing the work under this contract shall obtain a copy of the wage rate determination and shall distribute copies to each subcontractor. As the wage determi nation for each craft reflects an expiration date, it shall be the prime Consultant and each subcontractor's responsibility to ensure that the prevailing wage rates of concern is current and paid to the employee.
i. The Consultant performing the work shall be responsible for obtaining a copy of the State wage rate det ermination. State wage rates may be obtained at
http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/pwd/Determinations/Northern/Northern.p df. The Consultant shall be responsible for posting said wage rates at a prominent location at the work site and shall maintain same in a good readable condition for the duration of the work.
ii. Should the Consultant choose to work on a Saturday, Sunday or on a holiday recognized by the Labor Unions, the Consultant shall reimburse the City the actual co st of engineering, inspection, superintendence, and or other overhead expenses which are directly chargeable to the contract. Should such work be undertaken at the request of the City, reimbursement will not be required. To conform strictly with the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, of the Labor Code of the State of Califo rnia. To forfeit as a penalty to City the sum of TWENTY-FIVE A ND NO/100 DOLLARS ($25.00) for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed by CONTRACTOR, or by any subcontractor under Consultant, in the execution of this contract, for each calendar day during which any laborer, worker, or mechanic is required or permitted to work mo re than eight (8) hours and who is not paid the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work in violation of the provisions of Sections 1770 to 1781 of the Labor Code of the St ate of California. That all sums forfeited under the provisions of the foregoing sections shall be deducted from the payments to be made under the terms of this contract. iii. PAYROLL RECORDS - The Consultant to whom the contract is awarded shall ensure that the prim e and each subcontractor will, in accordance with Section 1776 of t he Labor Code, maintain certified payroll records. A copy of said records shall be provided with each invoice to the Public Works Department, Attention: Contract Compliance Officer. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to obtain copies of the current prevailin g wage rate determination for all

EXHIBIT 1
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)

subcontractors. Additionally, certified payroll records must be uploaded to the DIR website as required by labor code.

iv. APPRENTICESHIP STANDARDS - The Consultant shall comply with the provisions established in Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code concerning the 1) ce rtified approval by local joint apprenticeship committees for the employment and training of apprentices, and 2) contribution of funds to admin ister and conduct apprenticeship programs, if applicable to the job.

e. SANCTIONS

Deliverables must conform with all appl icable federal, state, and local laws.

Such conformity includes compliance with federal sanctions, and Contractor certifies that it has not and will not engage in prohi bited transactions with sanctioned persons or entities.

7. RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITY. City shall make available to Consultant all data and information in the possession of City which both parties deem necessary to complete the work, and City shall actively ai d and assist Consultant in obtaining such information as may be deemed necessary from other agencies and individuals.

8. OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT. Throughout the term of this Contract, Consultant represents and warrant s that it has or will have at the time this Contract is executed, all licenses, permits , qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally requir ed for the Consultant to pr actice its professions, and Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, keep in effect during the life of this Contract all such licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals. Consultant shall meet with the Public Works Director or other personnel of City or third parties as necessary on all matters connected with the carrying out of Consultant’s services. Such meetings shall be held at the request of either party hereto. Consultant further warrants that it will follow the best current, generally accepted and professional practices to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations , and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding this project.

9. OWNERSHIP OF WORK. All reports, drawings, designs, plan review comments, work product, and all other document s completed or partially completed by Consultant in the performance of this Contract shall become and remain the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject ma tter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Consultant agrees to exec ute any additional do cuments that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Contract. If any materials are lost, damaged, or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Consultant shall replace them at its own expense. Consultant shall keep materials confidential. Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Contract and shall not

EXHIBIT 1
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)

be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services unless the City expressly provides prior written consent.

10. CONTRACT AMENDMENTS. City reserves the right to make such alterations as may be deemed necessary or advisable and to require such extra work as may be required for the proper completion of the work contemplated by Consultant. Any such changes will be set forth in a Contract Amendment which will specify, in addition to the work done in connection with the change made, adjustment of contract time, if any, and the basis of compensation for such work. A Contract Amendment will not become effective until approved by the authorized City official.

11. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Contract at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Consultant. The Contract shall then be deemed terminated and no further work shall be performed by Consultan t. If the Contract is so terminated, the Consultant shall be paid for that percentage of work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received.

12. CONSULTANT STATUS. In performing the obligat ions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall have the status of an independent contractor and Consultant shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Cons ultant are its agents and employees, and are not agents of the City. Subcontractors shall not be recognized as having any direct or contractual relationship with the City. The persons engaged in the work, including employees of subcontractors and suppliers, will be considered employees of Consultant.

The Consultant shall be responsible for the work of subcontractors, which shall be subject to the provisions of this Contract. The Cons ultant is responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and persons directly or indirectly employed by them.

a. If in the performance of this Contra ct any third persons are employed by Consultant, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of C onsultant. All terms of employment including hours, wages, working c onditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging or any other term of employment or requirement of law shall be determined by Consultant.

i. It is further understood and agreed t hat Consultant must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Consultant’s personnel.

ii. As an independent cont ractor, Consultant he reby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against the City based upon any content ion by any third party that employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

EXHIBIT 1
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)

13. ASSIGNMENT. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Contract or any interest or obligation in the Contract without the prior writt en consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may set forth in writing. Consultant shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors.

14. HEADINGS NOT CONTROLLING. Headings used in the Contract are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Contract.

15. NOTICES. Any and all notices herein require d shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

To Consultant: Siegfried Engineering, Inc. To City: Public Works Director 3428 Brookside Road City of Stockton
Stockton, CA 95219 22 E. Weber Ave., Rm. 301
Stockton, CA 95202

16. LICENSES, CERTIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS. Prior to the City’s execution of this Contract and prior to t he Consultant’s engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Contract, Consulta nt shall obtain a City of Stockton business license, which must be kept in effect duri ng the term of this Contract. Consultant covenants that it has obtained al l certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Contract.

17. RECORDS AND AUDITS. City reserves the right to periodically audit all charges made by Consultant to City for serv ices under this Contract. Upon request, Consultant agrees to furnish City, or a designated representat ive, with necessary information and assistance.

Consultant agrees that City or its delegate shall have the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to performance of the Contract. Consultant agrees to provide City or its delegate with any relevant informati on requested, and shall permit City or its delegate access to its prem ises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purposes of determining compliance wit h this Contract. Consultant agrees to maintain such records for a period of three years from the date that final payment is made.

18. CONFIDENTIALITY. Consultant shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

19. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Consultant covenants that other than this Contract, Consultant has no financial interest with any official, employee, or other representative of the City. Consultant and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or inve stment that would be a ffected in any manner

EXHIBIT 1
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)

or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services under this Contract. If such an interest arises, Consultant will immediately notify City.

20. WAIVER. In the event either City or C onsultant at any time waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Contract, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition, or obligation.

21. GOVERNING LAW. California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue for all claims in the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin, Stockton Branch or, where applicable, in the federal District Court of California, Eastern District, Sacramento Division.

22. NO PERSONAL LIABILITY. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount due Consultant.

23. INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION. The response by Consultant to the Request for Proposals and the Request for Proposals on file with the City Clerk are hereby incorporated herein by reference to the extent that such documents do not differ from the provisions and terms of this Contract that shall supersede such response to Request for Proposals. This Contract represents the entire integrated agreement between Consultant and City, supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral, between the parties, and may be am ended only by written instrument signed by Consultant and City. All exhibits and this contract are intended to be construed as a single document. Should any inconsistency o ccur between the specific terms of this Contract and the attached exhibits, the terms of this Contract will prevail.

24. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Contract are severable to the extent that should any of its provisions or terms be declared void in whole or in part by operation of law or agreement of the parties, the remainder of the provisions or terms not expressly declared void shall remain enforceable and in full effect.

25. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than City and Consultant. //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//

EXHIBIT 1
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)

26. AUTHORITY. The undersigned hereby represent and warrant that they are authorized by the parties to execute this Contract.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF: the parties have executed this Contract the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF STOCKTON SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC.

B y : B y :

HARRY BLACK Signature

CITY MANAGER
A T T E S T :

P r i n t N a m e
B Y :

ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC Title:

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

B Y :

DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY

Paul Schneider
President
EXHIBIT 1
F:\
23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Task 1 | Background Research
Siegfried will review and be familiar with the City of Stockton Bicycle Master Plan, 2040 City General Plan, and other development plan
s including outside agency plans such as San Joaquin County adopted plans. Siegfried will visit the project site to conduct a field reconnaissance of the project area. Siegfried will review and verify the location and type of existing improvements, equipment, bus zone locations, intersection geometrics, posted speed limit, and bus route movements. Siegfried will review collision reports, sight distance, approach speed, truck volume, and other geometrical and operational characteristics for the project.

Siegfried will perform a field topographical and property survey and map a 120’ wide corridor along Mariposa Rd. from approximately 100’ West of MLK, to approximately Austin Road as shown on the RFP vicinity map. Siegfried will also include mapping cross streets 150’ each side of the main corridor. Final delivery will be an acad.dwg file as well as TIN & DTM Surface files. Included in the deliverables will be a .2’ color orthophoto. This image will be delivered as a .TIFF with a .TFW world file and shown in the background of the PRP. Records of Survey and mapping are excluded, as are coroner records and monument preservation as improvements are not proposed at this time. Siegfried will gather existing as built plans from the City as well as prepare Utility A Letters to plot existing utilities in the background of the PRP for accurate planning around major utilities.

Siegfried will collect the following data for use in the analysis:

New 24-hour roadway segment vehicle classification counts on Mariposa Road at the following segments Between Martin Luther King Jr Blvd/Charter Way and Farmington Road Betwe
en Farmington Road and SR 99 SB Ramps
Between SR 99 NB Ramps and Stagecoach Road
Between Stagecoach Road and Carpenter Road
Between Carpenter Road and Austin Road
New AM (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak period traffic counts, including bicycle and pedestrian flows, vehicle clas
sification, and maximum vehicle queue. Data will be collected on one day (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) at the following intersections:

Martin Luther King Jr/Charter Way/Mariposa Road
Marip
osa Road/Learned Avenue
Mariposa Road/Pock Lane
Mariposa Road/Juliet Road
Mariposa Road/Farmington Road
Mariposa Road/SR 99 Frontage Road
Mariposa Road/SR 99 SB Ramps
Mariposa Road/SR 99 NB Ramps
Mariposa Road/Stagecoach Road
Mariposa Road/E Munford Avenue
Mariposa Road/Golden Valley Industries Driveway
Mariposa Road/Carpenter Road
Mariposa Road/Austin Road
Existing roadway geometrics and traffic controls, collec ted through peak period field observations
Existing bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities, collected through peak period field observations Corridor travel times during the AM and PM peak hours
Collision history – most recent 5-year period using SWITRS and TIMS data Previously collected speed surveys, provided by the City. No new speed surveys are included in this scope.

Current traffic signal timing plans for study intersections, provided by the City Planned roadway geometrics and traffic controls, provided by the City

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1

F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Planned development along the corridor study area, provided by the City Operation Analysis
The team will analyze AM and PM peak hour intersection operations for the intersections listed under Task 1. SimTraffic 11 micr
osimulation software, which applies methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022), will be used. Analysis results will include intersection level of service, control delay, travel time, and maximum queue lengths for key turning movements. The SimTraffic microsimulation network will be calibrated to the observed intersection volumes (i.e., percent demand served) and observed maximum queues.

Exi
sting Active Transportation Network and Safety Review
Siegfried will evaluate existing active transportation facilities on the corridor and complete a safety assessment. This will include:

Do c
umentation of existing active transportation facilities, including an updated level of traffic stress analysis.

Documentation of all fatal/injury collisions and bike and pedestrian involved collisions between Martin Luther King Jr.

Boulevard/Charter Way and Austin Road. Data from the Sta tewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and the UC Berkeley SafeTREC Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) will be used. We will review the locations of each collision along with the primary collision factors and type of vehicle involved in the collisions.

Findings for this task will be documented in a technica l memorandum, provided to City staff for one round of review and comment.

Initial Planning and Alternatives Evaluation
Up to three alternative designs for Mariposa Road. Our work for this phase will focus on creating a shared understanding of the opp
ortunities and tradeoffs associated with existing and potential active transportation facilities along the corridor. This process will involve:

Documentation of the pros, cons, and tradeoffs of each facility type. This will be informed by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guides on bikeway and crossing selection and will incorporate a Safe Systems approach to corridor planning.

Analysis of the proposed level of traffic stress (LTS) along the roadway for bike and pedestrian facilities. This will take into consideration number of lanes, design speed, and separation from the roadway.

Coordination with San Joaquin Regional Transit District (RTD) staff to discuss existing and future potential for transit ridership along the corridor based on planned development.

A review of the land use and growth assumptions along the corridor in the City’s 2040 General Plan and associated travel demand model.

Findings for this task will be documented in a technical memorandum, provided to City staff for one round of review and comment.

Where appropriate, the document will be graphically enhanced with high-level cross sections, sketches of potential treatments, and maps. We will also participate in a working session with City staff to discuss our findings, respond to questions, and identify a preferred alternative for the corridor.

AS-NEEDED VMT ANALYSIS
A V
MT analysis may be necessary to remain consistent with the latest version of the City of Stockton Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines: INTERIM (December 2022), the base year Stockton TDM model will be used to evaluate short-term VMT effects of the proposed project. In addition, the cumulative year TDM model and/or the National Center for Sustainable Transportation (NCST) Calculator will be used to forecast long-term induced vehicle travel effects of the proposed project. As noted in the guidelines, VMT thresholds will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Note – because it is uncertain if the project will require VMT mitigation, VMT mitigation is not included in this scope of work. If mitigation is necessary, a supplemental scope may be required depending on the amount of VMT mitigation necessary.

Task 2 | Environmental Services
Ta
sk 2.1 | Background Research
ESA will review the 2040 City General Plan and associated EIR, the City of Stockton Bicycle Master Plan and associated IS/MND, the San
Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP), and other planning and environmental documents pertinent to the project, with the goal of identifying potential opportunities to reference or rely upon previously completed efforts, and to limit potential for redundancy and/or conflicts with previously approved documentation. ESA anticipates that the CEQA

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1

F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx documentation prepared for the Mariposa Road Precise Plan Road Plan (Precise Plan) will tier from the 2040 City General Plan EIR (GP EIR); review of the GP EIR will be specifically aimed at identifying a tiering strategy for the Precise Plan CEQA document, and NEPA document.

Deliverables:

Draft ti
ering strategy for Precise Plan CEQA document.

Task 2.2 | Env ironmental Services
CEQA Documentation
ESA will prepare an EIR. The EIR will evaluate up to two build alternatives plus the “no build” alternative, and will include an En v
ironmental Project Description based on information provided by the project team. An Environmental Checklist (Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines) will be completed to assess the level of significance of potential impacts. Each topic area will present the standards of significance; describe the affected environment; describe data sources and technical analyses used for the CEQA analysis; discuss project-specific impacts; identify if any potentially significant impacts where previously examined in the GP EIR; identify applicable mitigation measures from the GP EIR; identify additional mitigation measures, if necessary, and identify where potentially significant impacts remain significant and unavoidable following application of mitigation measures.

The analysis completed in the EIR will be supported by various technical investigations and studies that will be completed to examine in detail any potential impacts and recommended avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures. Key technical investigations will include:

Air Quality:

The Precise Plan area is located within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB) under the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin Val
ley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). The SJVAPCD has prepared CEQA Guidelines for assessing the air quality impacts of projects. For the Air Quality section of the EIR, ESA will assess the consistency of the Precise Plan with applicable air quality plans for the SJVAB and discuss the potential for the Precise Plan to adversely affect air quality or impede attainment of air quality goals. ESA will estimate off-road construction equipment emissions and on-road construction vehicle emissions using the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District’s (SMAQMD) Roadway Construction Model, OFFROAD2017 and EMFAC2021 models, as appropriate, for comparison to the applicable SJVAPCD significance thresholds for construction. While the Precise Plan would not create any new operational emissions sources, implementation of the Precise Plan would change operational traffic volume, speed, and fleet mix as a result of the roadway widening, and bicycle and transit infrastructure improvements. Changes in emissions would be estimated based on traffic data provided for the Precise Plan using EMFAC2021 emission factors for comparison with the SJVAPCD’s operational thresholds. This assumes that changes to traffic volumes, speed profile and fleet mix with and without the Precise Plan will be available for analysis.

Future construction activities associated with implementation of the Precise Plan would take place in proximity to sensitive receptors (residences) adjacent to Mariposa Road. The Office of Environmental Hazard Health Assessment (OEHHA) requires that a health risk assessment (HRA) be conducted if construction activities in the vicinity of sensitive receptors (residences) would take place for more than two continuous months. Though future construction activities associated with the Precise Plan may occur in phases, the HRA will assume that all construction will occur in one phase to conservatively estimate the maximum health risk impacts. ESA will conduct the construction HRA in accordance with guidance from OEHHA and CARB. The HRA will use U.S. EPA’s AERMOD dispersion model and health risk parameters specified by OEHHA. AERMOD uses site-specific meteorological and terrain data to provide conservative pollutant concentrations for the HRA. Concentrations at receptors will be converted to health risks using parameters specified by OEHHA and compared to the SJVAPCD’s health risk thresholds. An operational HRA is not included in this scope as the Precise Plan would not be anticipated to create any new operational sources of toxic air contaminants, and induced vehicle traffic resulting from implementation of the Precise Plan would not be anticipated to generate a substantial increase in toxic air contaminants, such that an operational HRA would be warranted.

ESA will identify applicable policies and mitigation measures from the GP EIR, and if necessary, identify additional practical, feasible mitigation measures for any air quality impacts identified from the Precise Plan identified as significant and evaluate whether mitigation measures would reduce the impacts below a level of significance.

Aquatic Resources Delineation Report:

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1
F
:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Two waterways and several large roadside ditches/swales are in or near the project area. An aquatic resources delineation will be performed to quantify the existing jurisdictional waters within the project site. The USACE jurisdiction will be determined in the field using the presence of an ordinary high-water mark and the methodology in the USACE 1987 wetland delineation manual and any applicable regional supplements. CDFW jurisdiction will be determined by the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, the location of a definable bed and bank, and the presence of associated riparian, wildlife, or fish resources. The boundaries of these jurisdictions will be mapped on figures of an appropriate scale and provided to Siegfried in GIS shape files.

A stand-alone Aquatic Resources Delineation Report (ARDR) will be prepared describing jurisdictional waters and wetlands in the project area. The report will include methods, results, and a graphic depicting the approximate size and location of any jurisdictional areas. The report will be consistent with the requirements of USACE, RWQCB and CDFW. Copies of field data sheets will be included. The report will describe delineation methodology and jurisdictional areas of the site. The report will provide the necessary documentation for developing and processing subsequent Section 401 permit and/or Waste Discharge permit, 404 permit, and Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, if applicable.

Biological Resources:

ESA
will complete a background review and biological resources reconnaissance survey of the project area to assess and document protected biological resources present or those with potential to occur, evaluate potential impacts on biological resources that may result from project construction and operation, and identify applicable mitigation measures. It is anticipated the project will be covered under the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). Mitigation measures identified for biological resources will be consistent with the SJMSP, as well as the GP EIR and/or, if necessary, additional mitigation measures will be identified to reduce the project’s impacts. The biological resources evaluation will also identify any expected regulatory permits that may be required for the project prior to construction, and if consultations pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) would be expected upon programming of federal funding for the project.

A Natural Environment Study (NES) will be prepared to document the analysis and results for both CEQA and NEPA.

Cultural Resources:

ESA will contact the Native American Heritage Commission to request information on known sacred sites in the project vici
nity and draft letters for the City to send to Native American tribes who have requested consultation in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.3(b). The results of any Native American consultation will provide the basis for the tribal cultural resources section of the CEQA document.

ESA will also complete a records search at the California Historical Resources Information System’s Central California Information Center (CCIC) to identify know locations of archaeological and historic resources. ESA will then examine the potential impacts of the project on archaeological and historic resources, identify applicable mitigation measures from the GP EIR and/or, if necessary, identify additional mitigation measures to reduce project’s impacts to below the level of significance. This scope assumes that no historic-era architectural resources are in the project area that would need to be recorded and evaluated. This scope also does not include a subsurface study to test for the presence of buried archaeological resources; if deemed necessary these tasks would be scoped separately.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions:

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be estimated using the CalEEMod, OFFROAD2017, and EMFAC2021 models, as desc
ribed for the air quality evaluation. The GHG section of the IS/MND will rely on the significance criteria in the Appendix G CEQA checklist in assessing the project’s potential impacts. The SJVAPCD has not updated its guidance regarding the evaluation of GHG impacts with respect to SB 32 and AB 1279 targets. In addition, the City of Stockton does not have an adopted “qualified” climate action plan (CAP) that can be used for streamlining project review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15183.5. In the absence of updated guidance from the SJVAPCD and the City, the analysis of GHG impacts will rely on guidance from other major air districts such as the Sacramento metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) for thresholds and analysis methodologies for the evaluation of construction GHG impacts. As the implementation of the Precise Plan would not generate additional traffic, but only accommodate traffic envisioned by the City’s General Plan and

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1
F
:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx already analyzed under the General Plan EIR, operational GHG impacts will be discussed qualitatively based on the project’s consistency with the General Plan.

The analysis will also evaluate the consistency of implementation of the Precise Plan with other plans such as the 2022 Scoping Plan Update, the San Joaquin Council of Governments’ Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy, and the City of Stockton Climate Action Plan.

ESA will identify applicable policies and mitigation measures from the GP EIR, and if necessary, identify additional mitigation measures, to reduce GHG emissions resulting from implementation of the project and to reconcile any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable plans.

Noise:

Sens
itive noise receptors, including residential uses, are located adjacent to the project area. ESA will complete a noise analysis to predict noise impacts associated with project construction and operation. ESA will identify applicable noise standards and thresholds, model predicted construction and operational noise as well as assess vibration levels from project construction equipment based on proximity to structures, identify predicted exceedances of applicable noise standards and thresholds, identify applicable mitigation measures from the GP EIR, and if necessary, identify additional practical and feasible mitigation measures reduce noise impacts to below a level of significance. Analysis of potential construction-related noise and vibration impacts will use the Roadway Construction Noise Model and vibration levels for construction equipment and building damage and human annoyance criteria published by the Federal Transit Administration. Operational impacts from the change in traffic along the roadway will be evaluated using methodology from Caltrans Traffic Noise Protocol.

A Noise Study Report (NSR) will be prepared to document the analysis and results for both CEQA and NEPA.

Visual Impact Assessment:

To a
ssess the potential for the project to substantially change the visual environmental of the corridor, specifically as it relates to potential removal of large trees in the corridor and/or changes to the nonurbanized character of portions of the project area, ESA will complete a visual impact assessment. The assessment will include photographs and description of the project area’s existing visual character, description of the anticipated changes to the visual environment that may occur from the project, including up to three photo-realistic visual simulations depicting the project area after construction of the project, an analysis of the significance of the change in the visual setting, and identification of mitigation measures that would reduce potentially significant impacts.

A Moderate Visual Impact Assessment (Moderate VIA) will be prepared to document the analysis and results or both CEQA and NEPA.

Whenever appropriate, ESA will seek to complete CEQA studies and documentation with NEPA requirements in mind, and/or in the format required by the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (SER), so that they may be relied upon to also support NEPA review in the most streamlined and efficient way possible.

Other topic areas that will be examined in the CEQA document may include Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, Wildfire (if not excluded from further review through the Initial Study process), and Mandatory Findings of Significance.

ESA will prepare an Initial Study to identify the topic areas to be evaluated in the EIR. The Initial Study will be attached to a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and circulated for a 30-day period.

Following circulation of the NOP, ESA will prepare an Administrative Draft EIR for review by the project team and City.

Following internal review of the Administrative Draft EIR, ESA will review the project team and City’s comments and make changes as necessary, resulting in a Public Draft EIR that is ready for distribution. ESA will prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) for review by the City. ESA will then submit the Draft EIR along with the NOC to the State Clearinghouse (electronic submittal).

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1

F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx At the close of the anticipated 30-day public review period, ESA will prepare a Final EIR by preparing responses to comments, and errata outlining any recommended changes to the text of the Public Draft EIR, the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Plan (MMRP), and Notice of Determination (NOD). ESA will support City staff with acceptance and certification of the document by City Council by assisting City staff with presentation materials for City Council review and attending the adoption hearing. It is assumed the City will prepare the project Findings. Within five days of the adoption of the EIR, ESA will file the NOD with the State Clearinghouse.

NEPA Documentation
ESA
will prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) to support a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for use by Caltrans District 10 Division of Local Assistance in completing NEPA review of the project. The analysis completed in the EA will be supported by the applicable technical investigations and studies prepared to support the CEQA review, as described above, plus additional studies and consultations specific to NEPA a s follows:

Air Quality Conformity Assessment:

The project is located in an area designated as nonattainment for federal ozone and PM ambient air quality standards. As a res
ult, preparation of an Air Quality Conformity Assessment (AQCA) will be required. ESA will prepare the AQCA based on information contained in the AQAR. ESA will prepare the forms and supporting documentation required for submittal of the project for interagency PM conformity review (e.g., Interagency Consultation [IAC]). It is assumed that the project would not be identified as a Project of Air Quality Concern (POAQC). The AQCA will be prepared using the Caltrans AQCA template and in accordance with applicable guidance and methodologies. Upon completion of the AQAR, AQCA, and interagency consultation for the project, ESA will complete a Caltrans Transportation Air Quality Conformity Findings Checklist to document that all air quality conformity requirements for the project have been met.

Section 106 Compliance:

In a
ddition to the notifications and cultural resources investigations completed to support CEQA, ESA will complete notifications to Native American tribes pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106), and prepare cultural resources documentation in the format required by Caltrans, which would consist of an Area of Potential Effect (APE) map, a Historical Property Survey Report (HPSR) and Archaeological Survey Report (ASR). It is assumed that no historic structures would be in the project area and preparation of an Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER) would not be required.

ESA will prepare an Administrative Draft EA for review by the project team, City and Caltrans. Following internal review of the Administrative Draft EA, ESA will review comments and make changes as necessary, resulting in a Public Draft EA that is ready for distribution. Following public review of the Draft EA, ESA will prepare a FONSI for Caltrans’ use in approving NEPA for the project.

If possible and appropriate, the EA will be combined with the EIR prepared for the project and completed in the Caltrans format for a combined EIR/EA.

Deliverables:

Elec
tronic copies, in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF, of environmental technical studies: Air Quality Assessment Report, Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, Natural Environment Study, Noise Study Report; Moderate Visual Impact Assessment, Air Quality Conformity Assessment, Historic Property Survey Report/Archaeological Survey Report.

Electronic copies, in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF, of Initial Study, Administrative Draft Environmental Document, Administrative Final Environmental Document, and all associated notices for internal reviews.

Public review-ready PDF of Draft Environmental Document and associated notices suitable for posting on the City’s website and at the State Clearinghouse, and for electronic transmittal to interested parties and/or a circulation list.

Up to five hard copies of Draft Environmental Document for posting at physical locations desired by the City.

Electronic copies, in Adobe PDF, of Final Environmental Document, FONSI, MMRP and associated notices.

Key Assumptions:

The
project would be exempt from the requirement to prepare an Induced Traffic Analysis model.

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1

F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx The project will be programmed into the current, conforming San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) Regional Transportation Plan & Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and the SJCOG Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP) prior to initiating air quality studies for the project.

Preparation of a Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) or equivalent is not included in this scope of work; this report or its equivalent can be completed under an amended agreement if necessary.

Preparation of a Biological Assessment (BA) and consultation with federal wildlife agencies pursuant to Section 7 of the Federal Endangered Species Act will not be required. If upon completion of the Natural Environment Study prepared for the project it is determined that the project may affect federally listed species; ESA is available to prepare a BA and support Section 7 consultation under an amended agreement.

The City of Stockton will be the CEQA Lead Agency and San Joaquin County and Caltrans will be CEQA Responsible Agencies for purposes of actions that take place within their areas of authority within the project area. San Joaquin County will be provided one electronic copy of the Administrative Draft CEQA document for their review and comment; one round of County review is assumed.

The City will post environmental documents and associated notices to their website for public review.

The project team, and the City, will develop a circulation list to send the NOI to and transmit the NOI; NOIs will be circulated electronically.

The City will publish the NOI in a local newspaper.

City will send the NOP and NOC to the County Clerk’s office for posting and pay for any submittal or posting fees.

It is assumed that up to five substantive comments will be received on the Public Draft Environmental Document.

City will submit the NOD to the County Clerk and will pay for any submittal or posting fees, such as the CDFW fee and County Clerk filing fee.

City staff will prepare the project findings for City Council approval.

The Final EIR will be approved and adopted by the City Council during one hearing.

Completion of an SJVAPCD Air Impact Assessment (AIA) Application pursuant to Rule 9510 would be completed prior to project construction and is not included in this scope of work.

Tas
k 3 | Preparation of Precise Roadway Plan (PRP)
The team will work collaboratively to integrate the recommendations from our Initial Planning and Conceptual Design memo and
analysis to reflect the survey data, traffic analysis, land use, circulation, geometric criteria and the 2040 General Plan.

Consideration will be given to proposed development plans along the corridor.

Task 3.1 | | Geometric PRP and Traffic Report
Siegfried believes that to refine the Specific Plan the lane geometry must be designed and based on real survey data. The purpose of the
more detailed design will be to review the horizontal design with the City of Stockton and finalize the conceptual plan. We understand that any minor change made to the horizontal design may require complete redesign in the future, so we feel that it is best to identify and finalize the precise curb and lanes at this stage. The following items will be clearly indicated and reflect ed in our submittal:

Final lane configuration(s)
Fina
lized face of curb design including crosswalks, bike ramps, truck aprons, etc.

Design vehicle(s) movement checks using AUTOTURN
Locations of all multimodal paths, sidewalks, bike ramps, etc. with appropriate widths Overall lane markings and pavement arrows for the entire study area Major Utility trunk lines, such as the Delta Water Supply, and their position within the ultimate configuration Design file showing actual measurements of the design parameters Calculations showing the stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance Fast Path speed calculations at entry and circulating
Lighting Layout
Tree Plan

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1

F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Based on the signal geometry in the traffic memo, the intersections will be proposed with the appropriate lane geometry, signing and striping, traffic signal poles, and be analyzed for potential congestion management concepts.

Conceptual Design
Once a preferred alternative has been identified, we will provide conceptual design support to the team on incorporating bicycle and ped
estrian facilities into the precise road plan. Final elements will be determined after the evaluation of alternatives, and may include:

Bikeway design details such as Separate Bikeway buffers and vertical elements or side path widths and details Details of bicycle and pedestrian crossing
Protected intersections, if Class IV facilities are selected Conceptual signal modifications and intersection design recommendations Lighting analysis and design
Sight distance evaluation at up to three locations
Design speed recommendations, based on published standards and site specific context The c
onceptual design will be presented to the team and City staff for two rounds of iterative review and comment.

Existing Plus Project Traffic Operations Analysis
As part of the Stockton Transportation Master Plan and Impact Fee Study, Fehr & Peers is updating the City of Stockton travel dem
and forecasting (TDF) model to reflect 2022 conditions. Fehr & Peers plans to use the updated 2022 base year City of Stockton TDF model for the Precise Road Plan, anticipating it will be available before the start of this project. The TDF model will be used to develop intersection turning movement volume forecasts for an “Existing Plus Project” scenario. Fehr & Peers will add an appropriate level of roadway network and traffic analysis zone detail to the model to support intersection-level analysis and project development.

Fehr & Peers will use analysis methods to analyze the intersection operations under Existing Plus Project (Preferred Alternative) conditions. Maximum queue lengths for key turning movements will be used to provide recommendations on turn pocket lengths at the study intersections. Ramp queuing at the Caltrans intersections is not anticipated to extend to the mainline, therefore, a mainline operations analysis is not included in this scope of work. If a mainline operations analysis is required, a supplemental scope will be provided.

Fehr & Peers will present the findings of the Existing Plus Project analysis to City staff and have budgeted for up to two (2) rounds of revisions to the analysis to incorporate any refinements to the preferred alternative scenario (based upon the outcome of the traffic operations analysis).

Cumulative No Project Conditions
Fehr & Peers will use the General Plan scenario of the Stockton TDF model to develop intersection turning movement volume fore
casts under the Cumulative No Project conditions. Roadway network and TAZ edits made to reflect existing conditions in the 2022 base year model will be incorporated into the Cumulative scenario, as necessary and appropriate, to support intersection- level analysis. However, it is noted that this scope of work does not include updates to the Cumulative TDF network for the Mariposa Lakes project. The land use and access assumptions included in the General Plan model for Mariposa Lakes will be used as is. If modifications for Mariposa Lakes are required, a scope amendment may be required depending on the intensity of the modifications.

Fehr & Peers will use the analysis methods outlined to analyze the intersection operations under Cumulative No Project conditions.

Analysis results will include intersection level of service, control delay, travel time, and maximum queue lengths for key turning movements. Maximum queue lengths for key turning movements will be used to provide recommendations on turn pocket lengths at the study intersections. Ramp queuing at the Caltrans intersections is not anticipated to extend to the mainline, therefore, a mainline operations analysis is not included in this scope of work. If a mainline operations analysis is required, a supplemental scope will be provided.

Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Operations Analysis
Fehr & Peers will use the analysis methods outlined in Task 2.1 to analyze the intersection operations under Cumulative Plus Pro
ject (Preferred Alternative) conditions. Intersection operations will be analyzed for one preferred alternative scenario. The team

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1
F:\
23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx will coordinate with City staff to review the lane configuration and traffic control assumptions of the SimTraffic models for the preferred alternative scenario.

Fehr & Peers will present the findings of the Cumulative Plus Project analysis to City staff and provide up to two (2) rounds of revisions to the analysis to incorporate any refinements to the preferred alternative scenario (based upon the outcome of the traffic operations analysis).

The Cumulative Plus Project analysis will also include a review of proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities and will evaluate the potential for additional crosswalks, bike lanes or modified crossing treatments along the study corridor.

Deliverable: Geometr
ic plans (30% draft PRP), Draft Traffic Analysis Report Task 3.2 | 60% Precise Road Plan
Based upon the refined master plan in Task 3.1 Siegfried will prepare the project Precise Roadway Plan (PRP) in accordance with
Stockton’s Municipal Code Title 16 Development Code, Division 5. Land Use/Development Procedures, and Chapter 16.148 Precise Road Plans. More specifically the PRP will be in accordance with the following:

Plan
sheets that are 24 inches by 36 inches and scaled at one (1) inch to 50 feet. Additionally, reduced, legible drawings of each large drawing sized at eight and one-half (8-1/2) by 11 inches will also be provided. The following minimum information shall be contained in the drawings:

The e
xisting design of the roadway (e.g., existing access points, lane configurations, existing rights-of-way, and the alignment) affected by the precise road plan adoption/amendment The proposed precise road plan design as adopted by the master plan Land Uses. Existing and proposed land uses, where applicable, affected by the precise road plan will be indicated on the drawings.

Overall the precise road plan will contain additional information such as proposed plant material, amenity locations, water sources, lighting locations, and any considerations that are contained in the adopted 2012 Bike Master Plan. This in accordance with the characteristics of the area to be covered by the plan, applicable policies of the General Plan, and overall City ordinance 015-09 C.S., eff. 12-3-09; prior code § 16-550.050.

Deliverable: 65% Pr ecise Road Plan for City review.

TASK 3.3 | 100% Precise Road Plan
Based upon the comments received from the City from the 50% Precise Road plan submittal Siegfried and the project team will prep
are the 100% project Precise Roadway Plan (PRP) and Final Traffic Report for City review. It is anticipated that the City designated Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the proposed precise road plan and forward a written recommendation to the Director.

TASK 3.4 | Fina
l Precise Road Plan and Hearings
Based upon the comments received from the City from the 100% Precise Road plan submittal Siegfried and the project team will prep
are the Final project Precise Roadway Plan (PRP) for City adoption. Following final review by the Director and the precise road plan adoption or amendment being deemed complete and reviewed by the DRC, Siegfried will attend the required public hearings conducted by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors, and Council. All required public noticing, staff reports, and agenda preparation shall be by the City.

Deliverable: Adopte
d Precise Road Plan
Task 4 | Publ ic Outreach
Siegfried will research and develop a coded database of potentially interested parties, which will be updated throughout the project with
names from the public meeting(s) sign-in; information from the project team; and from telephone, e-mail and personal contacts. The database will be coded according to interest and involvement with the project. Among the groups on the stakeholders list will be the following:

Council member Kimberly Warmsley and other elected and ap pointed officials Residents and property owners adjacent to the proposed project area Businesses and other establishments adjacent to the project area Emergency responders

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1
F:\
23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Stockton Unified School District
Public Transit
San Joaquin County
Caltrans
Utility Companies
Pertinent City staff
Public Information Meetings will be held to present concepts and design features to neighboring residents and businesses, and to the general public. Siegfried will determine a location near the project site to have the meeting. The meetings will be designed primarily to provide information on the project features, and goals.

Siegfried will plan for at least two (2) public outreach meetings and a public hearing near the project completion phase. Siegfried will also attend planning commission meetings, public hearing meetings, and meetings with stakeholders as required for the duration of the project.

Siegfried will schedule the public meetings/hearing, make arrangements for the meeting facility, handle other logistics, issue meeting notices (U.S. mail invitations, news releases, print advertisements, and flyers), and provide information for the City website. Working with the project team, Siegfried will also prepare exhibits to illustrate design concepts and project features and prepare other print materials, e.g., agendas, sign-in sheets, fact sheets, signage, that describes roundabouts. Siegfried will record public comments and prepare a very detailed Summary Report of each meeting. Working with the project team, Siegfried will provide appropriate responses to all comments, and make recommendations for administrative and public review.

Siegfried will establish an email contact list and maintain a detailed contact log of every contact. Social media options to dispense information will also be available, if desired and/or acceptable to the City of Stockton. In addition, Siegfried will create and maintain a website for the project which will serve as the digital information hub for the project. Project updates and other pertinent information will be housed on the website. The website will also include a comment section, so constituents can make comments regarding the project. Detailed records of each contact will be provided to the City and Project Team Staff at frequent intervals.

Siegfried will attend the required Planning Commission Meetings, Council Meetings and Board of Supervisors Meetings.

TASK 5 | Coor
dination/Meetings
Siegfried will provide project management services to meet the project scope, schedule and budget as set forth in the accepted prop
osal. Siegfried will maintain a clear and consistent communication framework for the duration of the project and attend meetings with City staff, public, businesses, and individuals as needed. The proposed scope of work will include an effective project management approach that includes regular project updates and coordination between the consultant and City staff.

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 1

WORK BREAKDOWN CHART FOR
Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan Project
June 9, 2023
Siegfried
Classification/Subconsultant
Task 1 - Background Research, Data
Collection, Analysis, and Concept
Design
Task 2 - Environmental Services
Task 3.1 - Geometric PRP and
Traffic Report 30%
Task 3.2 - 60% PRP
Task 3.3 - 100% PRP
Task 3.3 - Final PRP
Task 4 - Public Outreach
Task 5 - Coordination & Meetings
Total Hours
Hour
ly Rate
Managing Principal - Paul Schneider 32 24 60 60 40 24 40 120 400 $268.00 $107,200 Principal - Survey - Kevin Genasci 80 8 8 8 4 4 112 $240.00 $26,880 Senior Associate - Civil QA/QC _Alex Heuer 4 8 8 6 2 28 $211.00 $5,908 Senior Associate - Landscape - Bob Norbutas 8 8 8 8 24 56 $211.00 $11,816 Associate - Public Outreach - Chris Kay 100 100 $188.00 $18,800 Project Engineer - Ryan Gleave 44 120 120 120 40 48 492 $178.00 $87,576 Engineer II - Lauren Sensibaugh 80 80 80 24 264 $163.00 $43,032 Engineer I - Cathy Katkanova 20 16 16 4 56 $146.00 $8,176 Landscape Architect I - Regina Paredes 16 16 16 8 24 80 $126.00 $10,080 Senior Technician - Greg Smoy 24 24 $142.00 $3,408
Technician III - Anhtony Linnerman 20 16 16 4 40 96 $126.00 $12,096 Technician I - Dalton Reed 80 80 $93.00 $7,440
Surveyor II - Manny Debranca 80 80 $161.00 $12,880
Party Chief - Scott Soares 120 120 $217.00 $26,040
ESA -
Principal Consultant 5 - Melissa Logue 77 16 93 $279.00 $25,947 ESA - Senior Consultant 4 - Jon Teofilo 304 24 30 358 $181.00 $64,798 ESA - Principal Consultant 1- Heidi Koenig 14 14 $199.00 $2,786 ESA - Senior Consultant 1 - Zach Leisz 160 160 $163.00 $26,080 ESA -
Managing Consultant 1 - Chuck Hughes 106 106 $140.00 $14,840 ESA- Principal Consultant 3 - Mike Burns 2 2 $180.00 $360 ESA - Associate Consultant 2 - Laura Dodson 424 424 $137.00 $58,088 ESA - Senior Consultant 5 - Jyothi Iyler 206 206 $194.00 $39,964 ESA - Managing Consultant 3 - Cheri Velzy 60 60 $209.00 $12,540 ESA - Consultant 5 - Julina Medan 608 30 638 $122.00 $77,836 ESA - Senior Consultant 3 Brad Allen 40 40 $167.00 $6,680 ESA - Managing Consultant 3 - Dave Davis 40 40 $209.00 $8,360 F&P - Principal - Adrain Engel 4 2 28 8 8 4 54 $265.00 $14,310 F&P - Associate - Kari McNickle 14 26 16 8 8 12 4 88 $225.00 $19,800 F&P - Project Manager - Carly Hoyt 50 4 80 60 40 40 8 282 $185.00 $52,170 F&P - Planner Engineer - Feslia Chen 102 4 200 80 60 14 460 $135.00 $62,100 F&P - GIS Analyst - Marty Delgado 16 2 16 8 8 8 58 $130.00 $7,540 F&P - Support Jolyn Souto 13 4 16 16 6 5 60 $135.00 $8,100 WTrans - Principal Traffic QA/QC - Atul Patel 8 8 8 4 28 $285.00 $7,980 Aerial Mapping $45,000 $45,000 $45,000
Traffic Counts $8,500 $8,500 $8,500
Total Hours 663 2081 714 528 448 201 264 260 5159
Categ
ory Total $170,785 $329,423 $124,822 $95,244 $79,912 $37,635 $49,692 $57, 598 $945,111 Reimburables
$2,515 $8,577 $578 $256 $188 $665 $10,308 $602
Task Totals $173,300 $338,000 $125,400 $95,500 $80,100 $38,300 $60,000 $58,200 $968,800Not-To-Exceed Fee

EXHIBIT B

EXHIBIT 1
REV 2022‐05‐17
Insurance Requirements for Professional Services
Consultant shall procure and mai
ntain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non- owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(Not required if consultant provides written verification it has no employees)

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance appropriates to the Consultant’s
profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Stockton requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Stockton.

Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

Additional Insured Status

EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT 1
REV 2022‐05‐17

The City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). Additional insured Name of Organization shall read “City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.” Policy shall cover City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for all locations work is done under this contract.

Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. The City of Stockton does not accept endorsements limiting the Contractor’s insurance coverage to the sole negligence of the Named Insured.

Umbrella or Excess Policy
The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Contractor’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.

Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City of Stockton.

Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City of Stockton a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Stockton by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this

EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT 1
REV 2022‐05‐17

provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Stockton has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Self-Insured Retentions

Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Stockton. The City of Stockton may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Stockton. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City of Stockton. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City of Stockton may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Contractor to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City of Stockton reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Stockton.

Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at
least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims- made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT 1
REV 2022‐05‐17
Verification of Coverage
Contractor
shall furnish the City of Stockton with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City of Stockton before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City of Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City of Stockton is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Certificate Holder Address
The address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be:

City of Stockton
Its Officers, Officials, Employees, and Volunteers
400 E Main Street, 3rd Floor – HR
Stockton, CA 95202

EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT 1

CONTINUED
29 CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ GEOTECHNICAL ■ SURVEY ■ LANDSCAPE ■ PARTNERING ■ ATHLETICS 3428 Brookside Road, Stockton, CA 95219 ■ t | 209.943.2021 f | 209.942.0214 ■ siegfriedeng.com

SCHEDULE
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan 538 days Mon 7/17/23 Wed 8/6/25 2 City Issues NTP 0 days Mon 7/17/23 Mon 7/17/23
3 Background Research 50 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 9/22/23
4 Obtain Historical Documents 15 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 8/4/23 5 Research Boundary 15 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 8/4/23
6 Prepare Utility A Letters 5 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 7/21/23 7 Traffic Data Collection 35 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 9/1/23 8 Rights of Entry and Biological Site Review 35 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 9/1/23 9 Perform Topographic and Boundary
Surveys
35 days Mon 8/7/23 Fri 9/22/23
10 Public Outreach 295 days Mon 9/25/23 Mon 11/11/24
11 Prepare Public Outreach Plan and
Stakeholder List
20 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 10/20/23
12 City Review of Public Outreach Plan 7 days Mon 10/23/23 Tue 10/31/23 13 Send Meeting Notice #1 10 days Wed 11/1/23 Tue 11/14/23 14 Informational Meeting #1 0 days Tue 11/14/23 Tue 11/14/23 15 Individual Stakeholder Meetings 60 days Mon 10/23/23 Fri 1/12/24 16 Informational Meeting #2 0 days Mon 11/11/24 Mon 11/11/24 17 Precise Road Plan 425 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 5/9/25
18 Geometric Study - 30% 60 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 12/15/23 19 Prepare Geometric Study and
Perform Traffic Analysis
60 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 12/15/23
20 Traffic Memo and VMT Analysis 45 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 11/24/23 21 Agency Plan Check 20 days Mon 10/30/23 Fri 11/24/23
22 Discuss Comments With City 0 days Fri 11/24/23 Fri 11/24/23 23 60% Precise Road Plan 80 days Mon 11/27/23 Fri 3/15/24 24 Prepare for 60% PRP Submittal 60 days Mon 11/27/23 Fri 2/16/24 25 Agency Review 20 days Mon 2/19/24 Fri 3/15/24
26 100% Precise Road Plan 60 days Mon 3/18/24 Fri 6/7/24 27 Prepare for 100% PRP Submittal 30 days Mon 3/18/24 Fri 4/26/24 28 Agency Review 20 days Mon 4/29/24 Fri 5/24/24
29 Development Review Committee and
Director Review
10 days Mon 5/27/24 Fri 6/7/24
30 Final Precise Road Plan 240 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 5/9/25 31 Prepare and Finalize PRP 40 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 8/2/24 32 Director Approval of PRP 35 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 9/20/24 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Qtr 2, 2024 Qtr 3, 2024 Qtr 4, 2024 Qtr 1, 2025 Qtr 2, 2025 Qtr 3, 2025

PROJECT SCHEDULE
Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan Project
Fri 4/28/23 1 of 2

EXHIBIT D

EXHIBIT 1

CONTINUED
30 CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ GEOTECHNICAL ■ SURVEY ■ LANDSCAPE ■ PARTNERING ■ ATHLETICS 3428 Brookside Road, Stockton, CA 95219 ■ t | 209.943.2021 f | 209.942.0214 ■ siegfriedeng.com

SCHEDULE
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
33 Planning Commission Approval
(2nd/4th Thurs)
30 days Mon 3/31/25 Fri 5/9/25
34 Environmental Clearance 538 days Mon 7/17/23 Wed 8/6/25 35 Identify Study Corridor and Project
Conceptual Description
15 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 8/4/23
36 Preliminary Environmental Study
(PES) and Initial Study
73 days Mon 8/7/23 Wed 11/15/23
37 Prepare the Draft PES 10 days Mon 8/7/23 Fri 8/18/23 38 City Review 3 days Mon 8/21/23 Wed 8/23/23
39 Caltrans Review and Field Review 45 days Thu 8/24/23 Wed 10/25/23 40 Revise and Finalize PES 15 days Thu 10/26/23 Wed 11/15/23 41 Prepare Admin Draft Initial Study 15 days Mon 8/7/23 Fri 8/25/23 42 City Review 5 days Mon 8/28/23 Fri 9/1/23
43 Prepare Initial Study for Circulation 5 days Mon 9/4/23 Fri 9/8/23 44 Circulate Initial Study 30 days Mon 9/11/23 Fri 10/20/23 45 Prepare Studies 140 days Mon 11/27/23 Fri 6/7/24
46 Prepare Environmental Technical
Studies
140 days Mon 11/27/23 Fri 6/7/24
47 CEQA EIR and NEPA EA 242 days Mon 6/10/24 Tue 5/13/25 48 Prepare Admin Draft Environmental
Document
40 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 8/2/24
49 City, County, and Caltrans Review 45 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 10/4/24 50 Prepare Env Document For Public
Circulation
10 days Mon 10/7/24 Fri 10/18/24
51 Public Circulation of Documents 30 days Mon 10/21/24 Fri 11/29/24 52 Respond to Comments and Prepare
Admin Draft Document
20 days Mon 12/2/24 Fri 12/27/24
53 City and Caltrans Review 45 days Mon 12/30/24 Fri 2/28/25 54 Revise and Finalize Documents 20 days Mon 3/3/25 Fri 3/28/25 55 City Council Review of Final EIR and
MMRP
32 days Mon 3/31/25 Tue 5/13/25
56 Final Approvals and Filing 61 days Wed 5/14/25 Wed 8/6/25 57 City Council Approval of EIR, MMRP,
and PRP
1 day Wed 5/14/25 Wed 5/14/25
58 NEPA Approval and Issuance of
FONSI by Caltrans
60 days Thu 5/15/25 Wed 8/6/25
59 NOD 5 days Thu 5/15/25 Wed 5/21/25
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Qtr 2, 2024 Qtr 3, 2024 Qtr 4, 2024 Qtr 1, 2025 Qtr 2, 2025 Qtr 3, 2025

PROJECT SCHEDULE
Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan Project
Fri 4/28/23 2 of 2

EXHIBIT D

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT 1