1 (ZĞǀ͘ϭϬ.Ϯϳ.ϮϮ)
CITY OF STOCKTON
STANDARD AGREEMENT
1. This Agreement is entered into between the City of Stockton (“City”) and (“Contractor”)to provide
as set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.
_____________________________________________________________________________
2. The term of this Agreement is as follows, unless amended as described in Exhibit A and Exhibit C section 8:
Commences on: Terminates on:
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. The maximum not to exceed amount to be paid to Contractor for the term of this Agreement, including if authorized, reimbursement of expenses, is: $
4. The complete Agreement consists of all the following Agreement documents which by reference are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
J
([KLELW*6SHFLDO)XQGLQJ7HUPV &RQGLWLRQV
,IDSSOLFDEOHFKHFNER[
<(6
____________________________________________________________________________ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized parties have executed this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR
______________________________________________________________________________________________ Contractor’sName (if other than an individual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.):
______________________________________________________________________________________________ Authorized Signature Date
______________________________________________________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title of Person Signing
______________________________________________________________________________________________ Address
CITY OF STOCKTON
_________________________________________________________BB________________ +DUU\%ODFN City Manager Date
ATTEST:
____________________________________________________________________________ .DWKHULQH5RODQG&0&, ,QWHULPCity Clerk
APPROVED AS 7O FORM:
/RUL0$VXQFLRQ, City Attorney
BY:
Agreement Number:
(a) Exhibit A – Statement of Work
(b) Exhibit B – Insurance
(c) Exhibit C – General Terms Conditions
(d) Exhibit D –
H
Exhibit E – Compensation Schedule
(f) Exhibit F – Timeline
____________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________ ___________ Authththtththhhhthhthtttthhhthhthttthtttthhhhhhhhthhhtthhhttthhhhtthttthhhththhorized Signature 4/12/2024
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers Engineering Design Services December 31, 2026
853,250.00
Professional Services Special Terms & Conditions
ARPA
Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers
Glen M. Anderson, PE, PSAP, Vice President
4699 Old Ironsides Drive, Suite 350, Santa Clara, CA 95054 1
(Rev.10.30.18)
EXHIBIT A
STATEMENT OF WORK
Lincoln St. Pump Station and Force Main Project (UW24005)
1. Project Objectives
Perform design services for the new Lincoln Street pump station and force main facilities necessary to address the critical deficiencies in the City of Stockton Downtown Core District’s sanitary sewer collection system.
2. Project Scope
Consultant shall provide professional engineering services, including a basis of design report, design (preparation of construction plans, specifications, and estimates), permitting and environmental documentation, and engineering support during bidding and construction.
Refer to Tasks noted under Item No. 5 below and the attached Schaaf & Wheeler Proposal for the Lincoln Street Pump Station and Force Main Project (S&W Proposal) for further details of the project scope, which is attached and incorporated herein by this reference (Attachment 1).
3. Major Deliverables
The following deliverables shall be provided as described in the S&W Proposal and as noted below:
4.1 Review meeting agendas, meeting notes
4.2 Basis of Design Report
4.3 Permitting and Environmental Documentation
4.4 Plans, specifications, and estimates
4.5 Submittal review and responses
4.6. Record drawings
4. Tasks That Support the Deliverables
The following tasks shall be performed as described in the S&W Proposal and as outlined below:
5.1 Project Management
5.2 Basis of Design Report
5.3 Field Investigations
EXHIBIT 1
2
(Rev.10.30.18)
5.4 Permitting and Environmental Documentation (CEQA)
5.5 Design Packages
5.6 Engineering Services During Construction
5. Criteria of Acceptance for Deliverables
All deliverables /services shall be acceptable to the City and reviewed for consistency and expediency
6. Notices
Pursuant to Exhibit C – General Terms and Conditions, Paragraph 15 – Notices, the mailing address for all required notices is as follows:
Contractor: Schaaf and Wheeler City: City of Stockton
Attn: Glen Anderson Attn: City Manager
4699 Old Ironsides Dr., Ste. 350 425 N. El Dorado Street Santa Clara, CA 95054 Stockton, CA 95202
7. Key Personnel
Ana Chiono, Associate Engineer/City Project Manager
209-937-5650
[email protected]
Glen M. Anderson, Schaaf & Wheeler/Project Manager
408-966-5341
[email protected]
A summary of key personnel and sub-consultant roles and responsibilities is also included in the attached S&W Proposal, with full resumes included.
EXHIBIT 1
REV2022Ͳ05Ͳ17
Exhibit B:
Insurance Requirements for Professional Services
(Lincoln Street Pump Station and Force Main Project -UW24005)) Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non- owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(Not required if consultant provides written verification it has no employees)
4. Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions Insurance appropriates to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.
If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Stockton requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Stockton.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
EXHIBIT 1
REV2022Ͳ05Ͳ17
Additional Insured Status
The City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). Additional insured Name of Organization shall read “City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.” Policy shall cover City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for all locations work is done under this contract.
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. The City of Stockton does not accept endorsements limiting the Contractor’s insurance coverage to the sole negligence of the Named Insured.
Umbrella or Excess Policy
The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Contractor’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City of Stockton.
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City of Stockton a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Stockton by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
REV2022Ͳ05Ͳ17
endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Stockton has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Stockton. The City of Stockton may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Stockton. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City of Stockton. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City of Stockton may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Contractor to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City of Stockton reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Stockton.
Claims Made Policies (Professional & Pollution only)
If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at
least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims- made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
REV2022Ͳ05Ͳ17
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City of Stockton with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City of Stockton before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City of Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City of Stockton is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.
Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Certificate Holder Address
The address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be:
City of Stockton
Its Officers, Officials, Employees, and Volunteers
400 E Main Street, 3
rd Floor – HR
Stockton, CA 95202
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod Ϭϱ͘Ϭϴ͘ϮϯZDͿ
EXHIBIT C
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Goods, Equipment and Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A of the Agreement. Contractor shall provide said services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A of the Agreement.
2. City Assistance, Facilities, Equipment and Clerical Support. Except as set forth in Exhibit A, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish and maintain all facilities and equipment that may be requir ed for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. If applicable, City shall furnish to Contractor only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit A to the Agreement.
3. Compensation . City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.
3.1 Invoices submitted by Contractor to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time spent and City reference number. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s invoice, City will review invoice, and if acceptable make payment on approved invoice.
3.2 Upon completion of work and acceptance by City, Contractor shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitation. The City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed which the Contractor fails or neglects to submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after the work is accepted by the City.
4. Sufficiency of Contractor’s Work . All Contractor services, work, and deliverables shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner with due diligence in accordance with the degree of skill normally exercised by similar contractors supplying services and work of a similar nature, and in conformance with applicable laws, codes and professional standards. Contractor’s work shall be adequate and sufficient to meet the purposes of this Agreement.
5. Ownership of Work . All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its appr oved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, desi gns, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyright able subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree 1 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod Ϭϱ͘Ϭϴ͘ϮϯZDͿ
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.
Contractor and its approved subcontractors shall keep materials confidential. Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Agreement and shall not be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services, unless the City provides prior written consent.
6. Timeliness. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Further, Contractor acknowledges that the failure of Contractor to comply with the time limits described in Exhibit A and Exhibit F may result in economic or other losses to the City.
7. Changes . Both parties to this Agreement understand that it may become desirable or necessary during the term of this Agreement for City to modify the scope of services provided for under this Agreement. Any material extension or change in the scope of work shall be discussed with City and the change and cost shall be memorialized in a written amendment to the original contract prior to the performance of the additional work. Until the amendment is so executed, City will not be responsible to pay any charges Contractor may incur in performing such additional services, and Contractor shall not be required to perform any such additional services.
8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.
9. Contractor’s Status .
9. 1 In performing the obligations set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall have the status of an independent contractor and Contractor shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Contractor are its agents and employees and are not agents or employees of City. Contractor by virtue of this Agreement, has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of City. Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise an y rights or power vested in the City. No agent, officer or employee of the City is to be considered an employee of the Contractor. It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.
9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's 2 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod Ϭϱ͘Ϭϴ͘ϮϯZDͿ
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessa ry, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.
9.3 If in the performance of this Agreem ent any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision and control of Contractor. All terms of employment including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring and discharging or any other term of employment or requirements of law shall be determined by the Contractor.
9.4 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor's assigned personnel under the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
10. Subcontractor.
10.1 Subcontractors shall not be recognized as having any direct or contractual relationship with City. Contractor shall be responsible for the work of subcontractors, which shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Subcontractors will be provided with a copy of the Agreement and be bound by its terms. Contractor is responsible to City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and persons directly or indirectly employed by them.
10.2 If in the performance of this Agr eement any third pers ons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision and control of Contractor. All terms of em ployment including hours, wages working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging or any other term of employment or requirement of law shall be determined by Contractor.
10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.
11. Termination.
11.1 Termination for Convenience of City. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Contractor. The Agreement shall then be deemed terminated, and no further work shall be performed by Contractor. If the Agreement is so terminated, the Contractor shall be paid for the work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received. 3 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod 0ϱ͘Ϭϴ͘ϮϯZD)
11. 2 Should either party default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, the other party, at that party’s option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to the other party.
11.3 Funding- Non-Appropriation. It is mutually understood between the Parties that payment to the Contractor for performance shall be dependent upon the availability of appropriations by the City Council for the purposes of this Agreement. No legal liability on the part of the City for any paym ent may arise under this Agreement until funds are made available and until the Cont ractor has received funding availability, which will be confirmed in writing. If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted, or if the City loses funding for any reason, the Cit y, in its sole discretion, shall have the option to either (a) cause this Agreement to be canceled or terminated pursuant to applicable provisions of the Agreement; or (b) offer to amend the Agreement to reflect the reduced funding for this Agreement.
Non-Assignability. The Contractor shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any interest or obligation in the Agreement without the prior written consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may set forth in writing. Contractor shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors. Indemnity and Hold Harmless. 7R WKH IXOOHVW H[WHQW SHUPLWWHG E\ ODZ &RQWUDFWRU VKDOO KROG KDUPOHVV GHIHQG DQG LQGHPQLI\ &LW\ RI 6W RFNWRQ DQG LWV RIILFHUV RIILFLDOV HPSOR\HHV DQG YROXQWHHUV IURP DQG DJDL QVW DQ\ DQG DOO OLDELOLW\ ORVV GDPDJH H[SHQVH FRVWV
LQFOXGLQJ ZLWKRXW OLPL WDWLRQ FRVWV DQG
IHHV RI OLWLJDWLRQ
RI HYHU\ QDWXUH DULVLQJ RXW RI RU LQ FRQQHF WLRQ ZLWK &RQWUDFWRU¶V SHUIRUPDQFH RI ZRUN KHUHXQGHU RU LWV IDLOXUH WR FR PSO\ ZLWK DQ\ RI LWV REOLJDWLRQV FRQWDLQHG LQ WKLV DJUHHPHQW H[FHSW VXFK ORV V RU GDPDJH ZKLFK ZDV FDXVHG E\ WKH VROH QHJOLJHQFH RU ZLOOIXO PLVFRQGXFW R I WKH &LW\ RI 6WRFNWRQ 7KLV REOLJDWLRQ LV LQGHSHQGHQW RI DQG VKDOO QRW L Q DQ\ ZD\ EH OLPLWHG E\ WKH PLQLPXP LQVXUDQFH REOLJDWLRQV FRQWDLQHG LQ WKLV DJUHHPHQW 7KHVH REOLJDWLRQV VKDOO VXUYLYH WKH FRPSOHWLRQ RU WHUPLQDWLRQ R I WKLV DJUHHPHQW
Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain in full force and effect at its own cost and expense the insurance coverage as set forth in the attached Exhibit B to this Agreement and shall otherwise comply with the other provisions of Exhibit B to this Agreement.
Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement. Conformance to Applicable Laws . Contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Contractor shall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of services under this Agreement on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person. 4 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod Ϭϱ͘Ϭϴ͘ϮϯZDͿ
17. Licenses, Certifications and Permits . Prior to the City’s execution of this Agreement and prior to the Contractor’s engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall obtain a City of Stockton business license, which must be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor covenants that it has obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Agreement. Such licenses, certificates and permits shall be maintained in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement.
18. Records and Audits . Contractor shall maintain all records regarding this Agreement and the services performed for a pe riod of three (3) years from the date that final payment is made. At any time during normal business hours, the records shall be made available to the City to inspect and audi t. To the extent Contractor renders services on a time and materials basis, Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate accounting records, in a form prescribed by City or, if not prescribed by City, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, such records to include, but not be limited to, payroll records, attendance cards, time sheets, and job summaries.
19. Confidentiality . Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.
20. Conflicts of Interest . Contractor covenants that other than this Agreement, Contractor has no financial interest with any official, employee or other representative of the City. Contractor and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any manner of degree by the performance of Contractor’s services under this Agreement. If such an interest arises, Contractor shall immediately notify the City.
21. Waiver . In the event either City or Contractor at any time waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition or obligation. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial acceptance by City shall operate as a waiver on the part of City of any of its rights under this Agreement.
22. Governing Law . California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue for all claims in the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin, Stockton Branch or, where applicable, in the Federal District Court of California, Eastern District, Sacramento Division.
23. No Personal Liability . No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Contractor.
5 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod Ϭϱ͘Ϭϴ͘ϮϯZDͿ
24. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction or if it is found in contravention of any federal, state or city statue, ordinance or regulation the remaining provisions of this Agreement or the application thereof shall not be invalidated thereby and shall remain in full force and effect to the extent that the provisions of this Agreement are severable.
25. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor and its officers, employees, agents, r epresentatives or subcontra ctors shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state, or local law, rule or regulation against any employee, applicant for employ ment or person receiving se rvices under this Agreement because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition (including genetic characteristics), marital status, age, political affiliation, gender identity, gender expression, sex or sexual orientation, family and medical care leave, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. Contractor and its officers, employees, agents, representative or subcon tractors shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations related to non-discrimination and equal opportunity, including without limitation the City’s nondiscrimination policy; the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code sections 12990 (et seq.); California Labor Code sections 1101, 1102 and 1102.1; the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), as amended; and all applicable regulations promulgated in the California Code of Regulation or Code of Federal Regulations. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that “no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject ed to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial
assistance.” (42 USC Section 2000d).
http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titlevi.htm. The City requires compliance with the requirements of Title VI in all of its programs and activities regardless of funding source.
26. Force Majeure . Neither party shall be responsible for delays or failures in performance resulting from acts of God, acts of civil or military authority, terrorism, fire, flood, strikes, war, epidemics, pandemics, shortage of power or other acts or causes reasonably beyond the control of that party. The party experiencing the force majeure event agrees to give the other party notice promptly following the occurrence of a force majeure event, and to use diligent efforts to re-commence performance as promptly as commercially practicable.
27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.
28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.
6 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
(Rev. 10.30.18; Mod Ϭϱ͘Ϭϴ͘ϮϯZDͿ
29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or the opportunity to seek such advice.
30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.
31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.
31.1 This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between Contractor and the City; supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral between the parties and may be amended only by a written Amendment signed by the Contractor and City Manager.
31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.
32. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement.
33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.
7 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
1
(Rev. 07.12.22)
EXHIBIT D
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Definitions. The following words and phrases have the following meanings for purposes of this Agreement:
1.1 "Services" means, collectively, the services, duties and responsibilities described in Exhibit A of this Agreement and any and all work necessary to complete them or carry them out fully and to the standard of performance required in this Agreement.
1.2 “Deliverable” means quantifiable goods or services that will be provided upon completion of a project. A deliverable is any tangible material, work or thing delivered by one party to the other, including associated technical documentation. A deliverable can be tangible or intangible parts of the development process, and often are specified functions or characteristics of the project.
2. General. The following terms and conditions are applicable for the Professional Services only. The special conditions shall be read in conjunction with the Standard Agreement, General Terms and Conditions (“GTC”) Exhibit C, and all other Exhibits identified in the Standard Agreement.
2.1 Where any portion of the GTC is in conflict to or at variance with any provisions of the Special Conditions of the Agreement, then unless a different intention stated, the provision(s) of the Special Conditions of the Agreement shall be deemed to override the provision(s) of GTC only to the extent that such conflict or variations in the Special Conditions of the Agreement are not possible of being reconciled with the provisions of the GTC.
2.2 In the case of modification of a part or provision of the GTC, the unaltered part or provision, or both shall remain in effect. The Special Conditions shall relate to a particular project and be peculiar to that project but shall not weaken the character or intent of the GTC.
3. Time for Performance.
3.1 Contractor shall perform the services according to the schedule contained in Exhibit F.
3.2 Timeliness of Performance i) Contractor shall provide the Services, and Deliverables within the term and within the time limits required under this Agreement, pursuant to the provisions of Exhibit A and Exhibit F. ii) Neither Contractor nor Contractor’s agents, employees nor subcontractors are entitled to any damages from the City, nor is any party entitled to be reimbursed by the City, for damages, charges or other EXHIBIT 1
2
(Rev. 07.12.22)
losses or expenses incurred by Contractor by reason of delays or hindrances in the performance of the Services, whether or not caused by the City.
4. Standard of Performance
In addition to Exhibit C, Section 4 and 17, Contractor agrees as follows:
4.1 Contractor’s Services shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of Contractor’s profession currently practicing under similar conditions. Contractor shall comply with the profession’s standard of performance, applicable laws, regulations, and industry standards. By delivery of completed work, Contractor certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and local laws. If Contractor is retained to perform services requiring a license, certification, registration or other similar requirement under California law, Contractor shall maintain that license, certification, registration or other similar requirement throughout the term of this Agreement.
4.2 Contractor acknowledges that it is entrusted with or has access to valuable and confidential information and records of the City and with respect to that information, Contractor agrees to be held to the standard of care of a fiduciary. Contractor shall assure that all services that require the exercise of professional skills or judgment are accomplished by professionals qualified and competent in the applicable discipline and appropriately licensed, if required by law. Contractor must provide copies of any such licenses. Contractor remains responsible for the professional and technical accuracy of all Services or Deliverables furnished, whether by Contractor or its subcontractors or others on its behalf. All Deliverables must be prepared in a form and content satisfactory to the Using Agency and delivered in a timely manner consistent with the requirements of this Agreement.
4.3 If Contractor fails to comply with the foregoing standards, Contractor must perform again, at its own expense, all Services required to be re-performed as a direct or indirect result of that failure. Any review, approval, acceptance or payment for any of the Services by the City does not relieve Contractor of its responsibility for the professional skill and care and technical accuracy of its Se rvices and Deliverables. This provision in no way limits the City’s rights against Contractor either under this Agreement, at law or in equity.
5. Compensation
5.1 In addition to Section 3 Compensation in Exhibit C – GTC, the Contractor shall be compensated for the services provided under this Agreement as follows:
5.1.1 Contractor shall be compensated for services rendered and accepted under this Agreement and shall be paid monthly, in arrears on a not to exceed EXHIBIT 1
3
(Rev. 07.12.22)
basis, based upon the rates set forth in Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. Contractor may vary the compensation for each task in Exhibit E provided that the total project compensation listed in Exhibit E and the Standard Agreement is not exceeded.
6. Personnel
6.1 None of the work or services covered by this Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. Any work or services subcontracted hereunder shall be specified by written agreement and shall be subject to each provision of this Agreement. Contractor shall provide subcontractor a copy of this fully executed Agreement.
6.2 Contractor agrees to assign only competent personnel according to the reasonable and customary standards of training and experience in the relevant field to perform services under this Agreement. Failure to assign such competent personnel shall constitute grounds for termination of this Agreement. The payment made to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be the full and complete compensation to which Contractor and Contractor’s officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors are entitled for performance of any work under this Agreement. Neither Contractor nor Contractor’s officers or employees are entitled to any salary or wages, or retirement, health, leave or other fringe benefits applicable to employees of the City. The City will not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of Contractor. The City shall not be required to pay any workers' compensation insurance on behalf of Contractor. Contractor shall pay, when and as due, any and all taxes incurred as a result of Contractor’s compensation hereunder, including estimated taxes, and shall provide City with proof of such payments upon request.
6.3 Key Personnel: Because of the special skills required to satisfy the requirements of this Agreement, Contractor shall not reassign or replace key personnel without the written consent of the City, which consent the City will not unreasonably withhold. "key personnel" means those job titles and the persons assigned to those positions in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The City may at any time in writing notify Contractor that the City will no longer accept performance of Services under this Agreement by one or more Key Personnel listed. Upon that notice Contractor shall immediately suspend the services of the key person or persons and must replace him or them in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. A list of key personnel is found in Exhibit A, Scope of Services.
7. Reports and Information
Contractor shall at such times and in such forms as the City may require furnish the City such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, the costs and obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters are covered by this Agreement as specified in Exhibit A and Exhibit E.
EXHIBIT 1
4
(Rev. 07.12.22)
8. Findings Confidential
All of the reports, information, data, et cetera, prepared or assembled by the Contractor under this Agreement are confidential and the Contractor agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City. Contractor shall not be required under the provisions of this paragraph to keep confidential any data or information which is or becomes publicly available, is required by applicable law or by proper legal or governmental authority, is already rightfully in the Contractor’s possession without obligation of confidentiality, is independently developed by Contractor outside the scope of this Agreement or is rightfully obtained from third parties. Contractor shall give City prompt notice of any such legal or governmental demand and reasonably cooperate with City in any effort to seek a protective order or otherwise to contest such required disclosure.
9. Copyright
No materials, including but not limited to reports, maps, or documents produced as a result of this Agreement, in whole or in part, shall be available to Contractor for copyright purposes. Any such materials produced as a result of this Agreement that might be subject to copyright shall be the property of the City and all such rights shall belong to the City, and the City shall be sole and exclusive entity who may exercise such rights.
10. Deliverables
Contractor shall prepare or provide to the City various Deliverables. "Deliverables" include work product, such as written reviews, recommendations, reports and analyses, produced by Contractor for the City. The City may reject Deliverables that do not include relevant information or data, or do not include all documents or other materials specified in this Agreement or reasonably necessary for the purpose for which the City made this Agreement or for which the City intends to use the Deliverables. If the City determines that Contractor has failed to comply with the foregoing standards, it has 30 days from the discovery to notify Contractor of its failure. If Contractor does not correct the failure, or if it is possible to do so, within 30 days after receipt of notice from the City specifying the failure, then the City, by written notice, may treat the failure as a default of this Agreement.
Partial or incomplete Deliverables may be accepted for review only when required for a specific and well-defined purpose and when consented to in advance by the City. Such Deliverables will not be considered as satisfying the requirements of this Agreement and partial or incomplete Deliverables in no way relieve Contractor of its commitments under this Agreement.
11. Applicable Laws
Deliverables must conform with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Such conformity includes compliance with federal sanctions, and Contractor certifies that it has not and will not engage in prohibited transactions with sanctioned persons or entities. EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
1
(Rev. 10.30.18)
EXHIBIT E
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
The Contractor shall be compensated for the services identified in Exhibit A, Exhibit C, and Exhibit D to this Agreement as follows:
1. Project Price
1.1 The maximum the Contractor shall be paid on this Agreement is $853,250.00 (hereafter the “not to exceed” amount). The “not to exceed” amount includes all payments to be made pursuant to this Agreement, including City approved reimbursable expenses, if any. Nothing in this Agreement requires the City to pay for work that does not meet the Standard of Performance identified in Exhibit D section 4 or other requirements of this Agreement.
1.2 Standard Reimbursable Items: Only the reimbursable items identified in Exhibit A, C, and D (Compensation), shall be compensated to the Contractor.
Reimbursable expenses will be reimbursed without markup. Fees plus reimbursable expenses shall not exceed the amount set forth in section 1.1 of this Exhibit and a copy of the original invoice for the items listed in i, ii or iii below shall be attached to the invoice submitted to the City for reimbursement. Payments shall be based upon work documents submitted by the Contractor to the City and accepted by the City as being satisfactory to City’s needs. The City shall not pay a markup on any of the items listed in i, ii or iii.
Additionally, items such a telephone, fax, postage or freight are already included in the billable hourly rate. Contractor shall be reimbursed the direct expenses, which are the actual cost of the following items that are reasonable, necessary and actually incurred, by the Contractor in connection with the services:
i. Expenses, fees or charges for printing, reproduction or binding of documents at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost. ii. Any filing fees, permit fees, or other fees paid or advanced by the Contractor at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost. iii. Travel expenses shall be reimbursed in accordance with the City’s travel policy, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Reimbursement shall be made at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost.
1.3 The Contractor shall be entitled to receive payments for its work performed pursuant to the Agreement. The City will pay Contractor based on invoices for acceptable work performed and approved until the “not to exceed” amount is reached.
Thereafter, Contractor must complete services based on the Agreement without additional compensation unless there is a material change to the Statement of Work and Scope by a written Amendment.
EXHIBIT 1
2
(Rev. 10.30.18)
1.4 If work is completed before the “not to exceed” amount is reached, the Contractor’s compensation will be based on the Contractor’s invoices previously submitted for acceptable work performed and approved.
1.5 Subcontractor Costs: Compensation for subcontractors shall be limited to the same restrictions imposed on the Contractor. Maximum markup Contractor may apply to subcontractor fees, minus reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed 10 %.
2. Task Price. Below is the price for the services and reimbursable expenses as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement.
Task Description Task Price
1 Pro ject Management $ 57,380.00
2 Basis of Desi gn Report $ 54,640.00
3 Field Investi gation $ 208,070.00
4 Permittin g and CEQA $ 128,970.00
5 Desi gn Packages $ 308,210.00
6 En gineering Services during Construction $ 95,980.00 TOTAL PRICE $ 853,250.00
3. Hourly Rates. The following is a list of hourly billable rates that Contractor shall apply for additional services requested of the Contractor. Contractor shall be compensated based on the hourly rates set forth below, on a time and material basis for those services that are within the general scope of services of this Agreement, but beyond the description of services required under Exhibit A, and all services are reasonably necessary to complete the standards of performance required by this Agreement. Any changes and related fees shall be mutually agreed upon between the parties by a written amendment to this A
greement.
Hourly Billable Rate Schedule
See the attached Schaaf & Wheeler Hourly Charge Rate Schedule (Attachment 2).
4. Additional Fees. Should an amendment to the Agreement be issued for additional services that require the following items, the unit prices are as follows:
Title Unit Price
N/A $
5. Invoice to Address. Each invoice submitted shall identify the specific task(s) listed in Exhibit A and this Exhibit, and the completed work product/deliverable for the agreed upon price listed in this Exhibit. Invoices shall be submitted to the below address:
City of Stockton Municipal Utilities Department
Attention: Ana Chiono
2500 Navy Drive
Stockton, CA 95206
EXHIBIT 1
1
(Rev, 10.27.22)
EXHIBIT F
TIMELINE
1. Contractor shall complete the requested services identified in Exhibit A as shown in the attached Preliminary Project Schedule (Attachment 3).
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Schaaf & Wheeler
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
1171 Homestead Rd., Ste. 255
Santa Clara, CA 95050
(408) 246-4848
Saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaantntntnttnttttntntntntnntntttnnnttntntntntnnttntntnttntntnntntnnttnntntnntntntnnttttttntnttnnntnntntnttttnnta aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ClClCCClClClClClClClCClClClClCCCCCClClClClCClClClClClClClClClCClCllClClClllClCClClClCClClCCCllllCCClCCllCCCllCClllCCClCCCClCCCClCllClCCllCCCCllClara a, CA 9599959595595959995995995959595995959599959559995959599995995999555555955555555555550050005050550505050505050505005000550505050505050500500505055505050505005550500500550505050005050505050050505050505050000505050050050050005550050550000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 (4((4((((((4(((((44((((((44444(4((((44400088808080808000080800000000000000000000000000000000 )2 46 -
4848
SSSSSSccccchhhhhhaaaaaaaaaafffff
&&&&&
WWWWWhhhhhheeeeeeeeeelllllleeeeerrrrr
CONSULTINGNGGNGGNGGNGGGGGGNGGGGGGGGNGGNGGGNNGGNGNGNGNGNGGGNGNGGNGNGGGNGNGNGNGGNGGGNNGNGGNGNGGGNGNNNGNNNNGGGGGGGGGG
CICICICIICICICCCICICCICICICIICICCICICICIICIIICCCCCCCIIIIIICCIIICCIICCIIICCIIICICCICC VIL
ENGIINEN ERE S
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111117771777777 HoHoHoHooHooooHoHoHoHoHoHoHoHoHoHoHoHoHHoHoHoHoHooooHoHoooHoHoooHooooHooHoHooooooooHoooooHooHoooHoooHoooooooHooHHHomememememememememmmememeemememmemmemememeememeememememmmemememeemeememmememememeemmemmememememememmememememmememeememmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeememmmmmm ststststststststststststststtttststststststtstststsssttttttststststststsststtststsstsstssstsssstssstsssststttttttsssssssssssssss eaeaeaeaeeaeaeaaaaeaeaaeaeaaaaeaeaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd Rdddddddddddddddddddddddddddd.....,,............,,,,,,,,, SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSStettetetettetetttetetettetttetettttetettetteetteeeteeeeeeeeeeeeete. 2525555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 February 15, 2024
PROPOSAL FOR
City of Stockton
Lincoln Street Pump Station and Force Main
Project No. UW24005
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Table of Contents
Schaaf & Wheeler
Table of Contents
Cover Letter................................................................................................................... ..............1 Minimum Experience Qualifications Summary........................................................................2 Management/Method of Operation............................................................................................2 References.................................................................................................................................11 Corporate Structure, Organization..........................................................................................15 Appendix A: Resumes
Appendix B: Financial Statement
Addenda Acknowledgement
Proposal Fee (included separately)
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Schaaf & Wheeler 1
Schaaf & Wheeler
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
4699 Old Ironsides Drive, Suite 350
Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 246-4848
Cover Letter
February 15, 2024
Office of the City Clerk
First Floor, City Hall
425 North El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Subject: Lincoln Street Pump Station and Force Main, Project No. UW24005 To whom it may concern:
Schaaf & Wheeler is pleased to submit our proposal to provide engineering design services for the Lincoln Street Pump Station and Force Main project to the City of Stockton. Our team is positioned to design sanitary sewer system Facilities that pump and convey the downtown flows to the Regional Wastewater Control Facility (RWCF).
Recently, we completed similar projects for the Cities of Richmond and San Mateo as well as for the Port of Oakland and many other municipalities throughout the Bay Area. We are excited for the opportunity to apply this experience to the City’s project. Our knowledge of sanitary sewer flow studies, pipeline work, and pump station design will ensure we complete the project successfully.
Our team of engineers has extensive experience in wastewater system pipelines, pump stations, storage tanks, supply and distribution, and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. We regularly assess existing conditions, identifying deficiencies, developing alternatives, prioritizing projects, and designing improvements.
I will be the project manager and am authorized to contractually bind our firm. I have more than 17 years of experience designing sewer infrastructure in Northern California. Benjamin L. Shick, PE will be the principal-in-charge. He has more than 20 years of experience overseeing water resources projects. Lawrence D. Johnson, PE will provide QA/QC services. Larry has worked on more than 100 pump stations in the last 5 years.
The enclosed proposal outlines our project approach, work plan, and team qualifications. We welcome the opportunity to meet with the City to discuss our proposal further. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at 4699 Old Ironsides Drive, Suite 350 Santa Clara, CA 95054; (408) 246-4848 x 217; [email protected].
Sincerely,
Schaaf & Wheeler
Glen M. Anderson, PE, PSAP
Vice President
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Minimum Experience Qualifications Summary
Schaaf & Wheeler 2
Minimum Experience Qualifications Summary
Firm Name: Schaaf & Wheeler
Type of Organization: Corporation – Incorporated in California since 1985, in business 39 years
Primary Contact: Glen M. Anderson, PE
(408) 246-4848 x 217; [email protected]
Offices: HQ: 4699 Old Ironsides Drive, Suite 350, Santa Clara, CA 95054 870 Market Street, Ste. 1278, San Francisco, CA 94102
2200 Range Avenue, Ste. 201, Santa Rosa, CA 95403
3 Quail Run Circle, Ste. 101, Salinas, CA 93907
10232 Donner Pass Road #4, Truckee, CA 96161
Professional
Registrations and
Affiliations:
Certified State of California Small Business Enterprise Certification No. 40527
Schaaf & Wheeler has provided wastewater design services to public agencies throughout Northern California for almost 40 years. Some of our recent projects include:
Ferry Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station for the Richmond Municipal Sewer District; Maritime Sanitary Sewer Compliance for the Port of Oakland; Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations Rehabilitation for the City of San Mateo; and Canon Sanitary Sewer Pump Station for the Stege Sanitary District.
Our team will be led by Glen M. Anderson, PE as project manager, who is NASSCO PACP, MACP, and LACP Certified and is a Pump System Assessment Professional, as certified by the Hydraulic Institute.
Glen will be supported by Benjamin L. Shick, PE as principal-in-charge. Ben has more than 20 years of experience overseeing pump station design projects. Lawrence (Larry) D. Johnson, PE will provide QA/QC services. Larry has designed dozens of pump stations throughout Northern California and has worked closely with the City for several years as a subconsultant to Kier + Wright.
Management/Method of Operation
Management
Through previous similar projects, we have found that efficiency is the key to successful projects. By developing and implementing an efficient and easy to follow project work plan, we can ensure the project is completed on budget and in a timely manner that allows for detailed quality reviews prior to deliverables. This will let the City focus on the engineering aspects of the deliverable rather than quality control. Outlined below are several areas that we feel are critical to a successful project:
1. Project manager involvement. Schaaf & W heeler project managers actively provide engineering support to the project. This allows the project manager to be aware of project needs and challenges as they arise, allowing for a quick shift in the project approach, if necessary. This intimate knowledge of the project will also allow the City to stay informed of project progress and changes that may arise.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Management/Method of Operation
Schaaf & Wheeler 3
2. Early data review will allow the project team to identify items critical to design.
Additionally, early review of available data will inform the project team on how to proceed with field work. It will be critical to understand the hydraulics of the upstream system that may impact the operating conditions of the new station or may drive design considerations.
3. Development and constant update of a critical -path schedule will ensure sufficient staff are dedicated to the project. Additionally, an informative schedule will allow the City to anticipate project deliverables and schedule review staff, minimizing the City’s review time.
Diligent project management will play a critical role in providing a quality service that meets the City’s needs. Schaaf & Wheeler’s project manager, Glen Anderson, PE will be the City’s point of contact throughout the project. All project staff and subconsultants will report to Glen to expedite coordination and deliverables for the City.
With experience from several similar projects, Schaaf & Wheeler has developed and will employ several tested tools as part of our services. These procedures and tools will allow us to provide the City with effective project management and high overall quality of service throughout the project.
Consistent Communication: Bi-weekly conference calls allow Schaaf & Wheeler team to communicate with the City’s project staff on a consistent, prescheduled basis. This allows the City staff to be aware of progress made, needed input and keeps them involved in the project and decision making. Similar to construction progress meetings, these conference calls are typically very short, providing an update to both parties. If an issue arises, it can be dealt with quickly, limiting the potential impact to schedule and budget.
In-Person Meetings: While much
communication and coordination can occur
through digital means, there is a significant
benefit of face-to-face meetings. As such, we
include a kick-off meeting and design review
meetings in our scope. This allows for a
collaborative workshop environment to guide the
project to the end result desired by the City.
QA/QC: Larry Johnson, PE is on board to
provide quality control review of all deliverables.
With each quality control review, a detailed
comment and response form will be filled out
and submitted to the City with the associated
submittal. A typical iteration of our quality review
procedure is shown in the adjacent figure.
Pump Station Specifics
The Schaaf & Wheeler team proposed for this project has designed hundreds of sewer pump stations. From these pump stations, we have gained valuable insight that we bring to this project. Discussed herein are design considerations specific to the Lincoln Street Pump Station EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Management/Method of Operation
Schaaf & Wheeler 4
as well as potential changes to the project approach that may provide design efficiencies and cost savings for the City.
As identified in the RFP, the station’s design capacity is to be 5.2 million gallons per day (mgd), which equates to approximately 3,600 gallons per minute (gpm). In order to accurately size the required pumps, the forcemain must first be sized. The table below shows several potential nominal forcemain sizes, the associated velocities, approximate headlosses, and approximate pumping horsepower required to pump the peak flow. As the table reveals, the forcemain diameter can significantly alter the friction loss within the forcemain and the required pumping horsepower.
Further guiding the forcemain sizing is the City’s public work standards that state for forcemains longer than 1,000 feet in length, velocity should be limited to approximately 5 feet per second (fps).
Table: Pump Station Forcemain Diameter Impact on Pump Motor Sizing Forcemain
Diameter (in)
Flow Velocity
(fps)
Forcemain
Friction Loss (ft)
Pumping
Horsepower
12 10.2 66 130
14 7.5 32 73
16 5.8 16 54
18 4.6 9 44
In addition to pumping
horsepower, the forcemain
sizing can impact the viability
of variable frequency drives
(VFDs) by shifting the system
to either a static driven system
or a friction driven system.
Typically, systems that have
high friction headloss benefit
significantly from the use of
VFDs because these systems
typically allow for large
amounts of turn down while
maintaining high efficiencies.
Alternatively, systems with high
static head typically do not
benefit significantly from VFDs
because the amount of
turndown is limited and
efficiency is decreased as the operation moves to the left of performance curve. This is summarized in the two system and pump curves shown to the right, each of which shares a common design point.
Schaaf & Wheeler will evaluate forcemain diameters and VFD suitability as part of our preliminary design effort. For the purposes of discussion, we have assumed an 18-inch forcemain that has allowed us to preliminarily select sewage pumps and prepare conceptual layouts for discussion. Use of an 18-inch forcemain limits flow velocities below 5 feet per second EXHIBIT 1
Management/Method of Operation
Schaaf & Wheeler 5
as required by the City’s standards. We do want to have discussions as part of the design development process as we feel that allowing for slight deviations from the City’s standards may allow for pumps that are a better fit and offer more operational flexibility.
Using the design parameters outlined in the RFP and assuming an 18-inch forcemain, the proposed pump station would include three 15-horsepower Flygt NP 3153 LT pumps for duty service as well as a fourth pump in standby to ensure the station’s firm capacity is maintained as required by the City standards. We have prepared a cursory hydraulic system curve to confirm pump sizing. While we have preliminarily sized the station for four pumps, there are benefits to constructing the station with three slightly larger pumps that we can discuss during preliminary design.
The figure below shows a potential site layout and station configuration. We have included a CMU building to house electrical components and a standby generator. Ideally, the wetwell and valve vault would be precast concrete. However, due to the size of the station, we anticipate the wetwell will be cast in place. We have also included security fencing and other site improvements to make the facility secure and safe for staff to work. As part of the kickoff meeting, we would hope to engage stakeholders to determine expectations for the site.
One Pump:
1,802 gpm, 2.3 fps
Two Pumps:
3,028 gpm, 3.9 fps
Three Pumps:
3,769 gpm, 4.8 fps
0.0 1.3 2.6 3.8 5.1 6.4 7.7 9.0 10.3
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8 ,000
Force Main Velocity (fps)
Total Dynamic Head (ft)
Pumped Flow (gpm)
Station Design Flow: 5.2 MGD (3,611 gpm)
System - Approximate Average TDH
One Pump
Two Pumps
Three Pumps
Pump Best Efficiency Point
City Standard Approximate Max FM Velocity: 5.0 fps
Pump: Flygt Model N 3153 LT - 414 Impeller - 15 HP Motor Force Main: 18-in Diameter (AWWA PVC C900, DR 25), 2,400-ft Long EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Management/Method of Operation
Schaaf & Wheeler 6
Scope
Outlined below is our scope of services that aligns with the City’s identified scope.
Task 1: Project Management
This task includes all project management tasks such as coordinating with the City, coordinating with subconsultants, meeting scheduling, attendance, agenda and minute preparation, and monthly status and budget updates. The scope assumes:
Bi-weekly coordination calls via MS Teams (26 assumed, 1 hour each) Deliverable review meetings/workshops with City, in-person or via MS Teams at City’s discretion (4 assumed, 2 hours each)
Monthly invoices, schedule updates, status reports
Task 2: Basis of Design Report
We will prepare a basis of design report outlining proposed facility components and potential alternatives. We anticipate preparing a draft basis of design for City review. After City review and alternative selections (if applicable), we will finalize the basis of design. It is intended that the basis of design report will define the project goals, design intent, and design criteria that will serve as the basis for the project as it moves to detailed design. The City’s pump station design criteria will serve as a guide for all proposed improvements. In general, the basis of design report will outline:
Site layout, configurations, and amenities
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Management/Method of Operation
Schaaf & Wheeler 7
Anticipated construction methodologies
Equipment type, sizing, quantities and configurations Electrical service sizing
Preliminary station design (30% level) showing site plans, structure plans, mechanical plans, pump station sections, single line diagrams
Anticipated permits for proposed construction methodologies Constructability considerations
Phasing discussion for implementation of the new system and decommissioning of existing facilities.
Draft will include any alternatives for City consideration Task 3: Field Investigations
Surveying: Our subconsultant, Kier + Wright, will perform an aerial survey of the project site and alignment. This flight will provide an orthorectified aerial photo as well as topography. Kier + Wright will supplement the aerial survey with traditional on-ground surveying to verify aerial survey accuracy and establish the location of all utilities with surface features. Where accessible, utility depths will be dipped. Right of way and property boundaries will be included from publicly available sources. Kier + Wright has significant experience working in Stockton and will perform surveying on the City’s coordinate system and vertical datum.
Geotechnical investigation: Our subconsultant, Haley & Aldrich, will perform three borings at the pump station site and along the proposed alignment. Boring samples will be analyzed for geotechnical and environmental considerations. A geotechnical report will be prepared that will be used for design and construction of the station and forcemain.
Utility Location: We have included scope for 10 utility potholes to depths of 10 feet.
Additionally, we have included scope for two days (16 hours) of electronic utility location. We have several utility locators at our disposal to meet the project schedule.
Corrosion Protection: We anticipate mitigating corrosion concerns that may exist through design, using corrosion resistant materials. That said, we have included minimal scope for a corrosion engineer to review the corrosion information and confirm the design is corrosion resistant.
Task 4: Permitting and CEQA
Schaaf & Wheeler, as well as our subconsultant, Montrose, will assist the City in the permitting and CEQA process. Upon cursory review of the project, Montrose believes that the project should qualify for a categorical exemption, but this will be analyzed as the project is further detailed. We have included preparation of an initial study/mitigated negative declaration (IS/MND) as an optional task.
For permitting, we will coordinate with the necessary agencies to obtain the required permits for the project. Since the permitting process will be a critical path item, we will prioritize the permits and develop a schedule so that we can plan the project accordingly. It is also important to note that though we are not proposing improvements within Caltrans roadways, we are passing through Caltrans ROW and will be relatively close to their bridge structures. We anticipate the need for a Caltrans encroachment permit, and it may need to be reviewed and approved by headquarters since it is close to their bridges. We have assumed the following permits will be required:
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Management/Method of Operation
Schaaf & Wheeler 8
City Building Permit for Pump Station
City Encroachment Permit for work in Public ROW
Caltrans Encroachment Permit
USACE Section 404 Permit D (considered a “non-reporting” action, but coordination isincluded)
CDFW Section 1602 Permit
RWQQB Section 401 Permit
o Includes preparation of required “frac-out” plan
Task 5: Design Packages
After finalizing the basis of design, Schaaf & Wheeler will move into preparation of detailed construction documents, including plans, specifications, and cost estimates. As requested in the RFP, we have included 60%, 90%, 100% and Final design packages in our scope. Listed below are the anticipated plan sheet descriptions as well as the level of design with which they are planned for inclusion:
Drawing Index/Cover Sheet (60%, 90%, 100%, Final)
Design Criteria (60%, 90%, 100%, Final)
Standard Details for Each Discipline (60%, 90%, 100%, Final) Project Specific Details (90%, 100%, Final)
Site Plans and Layouts (60%, 90%, 100%, Final)
Pipeline Plan and Profile (60%, 90%, 100%, Final)
Mechanical Plans and Sections (60%, 90%, 100%, Final) Structural Plans and Sections (90%, 100%, Final)
Electrical Plans and Sections (60%, 90%, 100%, Final) Interior and Exterior Lighting Plans (90%, 100%, Final) P&IDs (90%, 100%, Final)
Single Line Diagrams (60%, 90%, 100%, Final)
Cathodic Protection Details (90%, 100%, Final) (if required) SCADA Architecture and Block Diagrams (90%, 100%, Final) Reference Drawings (90%, 100%, Final)
Specifications will be prepared in CSI format and coordinated with the City’s front-end specifications (Divisions 0 and 1). The 60% specifications submittal will include an index of all anticipated specifications sections as well as technical specifications for major project components. The 90% specifications will be nearly complete with only minor changes anticipated between the 90% and 100% level. The 100% specifications will be considered final with the only anticipated changes coming from City comment on the 100% specifications.
The intent of the design process will be to provide the City with bid-ready plans and specifications that will be used for public bidding and construction. The cost estimate will be used to accurately estimate the funding necessary for the project construction. The deliverables will be provided as requested in the RFP.
Task 6: Engineering Services During Construction
Schaaf & Wheeler will provide engineering services during construction (ESDC). For scoping purposes, we have assumed the following level of effort for ESDC:
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Management/Method of Operation
Schaaf & Wheeler 9
Submittal Review: Schaaf & Wheeler will review 40 contractor submittals and 20 contractor resubmittals (60 reviews total). For budgeting purposes, we have assumed two hours per submittal review and one hour for resubmittal review. RFI Review and Response: Schaaf & Wheeler will review and respond to contractor RFIs. For scoping purposes, we assume 10 RFIs at one hour each. Construction Meetings: Schaaf & Wheeler has included scope to attend the pre-bid job walk, preconstruction meeting, and six construction meetings. Each meeting is assumed to be one hour.
Schaaf & Wheeler will prepare and submit record drawings based on contractor- provided plan markups. Record drawings will be provided to the City in PDF format and one full sized hard copy will be provided as well.
Design Alternatives & Other Considerations
The RFP identifies design elements to incorporate into the project and as such, we have included these efforts in our scope of services. That said, we believe there are a few design elements that can be modified or eliminated to provide the City substantial cost savings during design and construction while minimizing risk and maintaining the desired level of service.
Reuse of the existing siphon: The RFP identifies reusing the existing siphon under Mormon Slough to provide a parallel, redundant forcemain. While the allure of reusing an existing creek crossing is understandable, this is potentially risky and is not a cost- effective method to construct a redundant forcemain. As stated in the RFP, the existing siphon is old, difficult to clean, and in an unknown physical condition. The likelihood that repairs to and modification of the existing siphon are required during construction is quite high. Surveying, design, and permitting can be reduced by eliminating the reuse of the siphon.
Additionally, by its nature, a siphon is a low point in the system. The clogging problems and difficult cleaning that plague the siphon are likely to carry over to the new forcemain installed within it.
Alternatively, if a redundant forcemain is desired, it would be more cost-effective, less risky, and less impactful to the public to construct two parallel forcemains along the primary alignment. Because this alignment will already be under construction, no significant additional construction effort will be required, and the impacts to the public from construction will be limited to the minimum required area. A parallel forcemain can be constructed along the primary alignment for essentially the cost of the materials.
Mormon Slough crossing: To cross Morman Slough, we have assumed that a trenchless crossing will be required as well as the geotechnical and permitting requirements associated with it. This trenchless crossing adds cost and, perhaps more significantly, can greatly increase the permitting duration for the project.
Though the bridge crossing Mormon Slough was designed and constructed by Caltrans, when looking up the bridge number, it is a City or County bridge as designated by the “C” included in the bridge number. As such, we would propose to evaluate the bridge to determine if it has sufficient capacity to support hanging the forcemain from it. If evaluation reveals that the bridge does not have structural capacity for the pipe, we would revert to a trenchless crossing. If the bridge does have capacity, we would further investigate the feasibility and benefits of installing the pipes on the side of the bridge. We EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Management/Method of Operation
Schaaf & Wheeler 10
would expect decreased engineering and permitting efforts associated with installing the pipe on the side of the bridge.
Additionally, regardless of the creek crossing method, it may be prudent to include provisions for connecting a temporary pipeline across the creek. By including valves and cam-lock connections on both sides of the creek crossings, we can ensure that even in a catastrophic failure of the bridge or creek, service can be quickly restored. Including temporary pipeline connections may also prove beneficial if the bridge ever needs replacing in the future.
Construction Phasing: This project has the luxury of utilizing the existing sewer system while the replacement project is built in parallel. As such, phasing appears to be straightforward. A phasing flow chart is shown below, representing what we believe is a feasible construction method. Detailed representative phasing plans will be included in the construction documents, but we will also require the contractor to prepare a detailed phasing plan that aligns specifically with their means and methods.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
References
Schaaf & Wheeler 11
References
Schaaf & Wheeler has completed numerous projects similar in size and scope to the Lincoln Street Pump Station and Force Main project. Details and reference information for some of those projects are included below.
Client and Contact:
Mary Phelps
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94531
(510) 774
-6300
[email protected]
Contract Value: $375,000
Construction Cost: $1,948,000
Project Duration: 2021 – 2023
Team Members:
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE; Brett
F. Crews, PE; Glen M. Anderson,
PE
Subcontractors:
Kier + Wright
TJCAA
BSK & Associates
Ferry Point Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
The Richmond Municipal Sewer District (RMSD) along
with their system operator Veolia, provide collection and treatment services within the central and southern parts of the City of Richmond. This includes the operation and
maintenance of 13 lift stations,
one of which being the
Ferry Point Lift Station (FPLS) located at the intersection of Brickyard Cove and Dornan Road.
The City of Richmond contracted Schaaf & Wheeler to
design the replacement for FPLS and appurtenances
since it has exceeded its design life and has experienced a number of operational issues in the recent past.
Additionally, future development adjacent to the FPLS site will be served by the FPLS – requiring an increase in
capacity of the FPLS.
FPLS collects wastewater within the southern portion of the Point Richmond/Castro sewershed. Flows are
conveyed to a transition structure located at the northern entrance of the Point Richmond Tunnel, where it then
gravity flows to the wastewater treatment
plant.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
References
Schaaf & Wheeler 12
Client and Contact:
Quynh Nguyen
Port of Oakland
530 Water Street
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 627
-1240
[email protected]
Contract Value: $1,824,904
Construction Cost: TBD
Project Duration: May 2021 –
May 2025 (Ongoing)
Team Members:
Glen M. Anderson, PE
Brett F. Crews, PE; Lawrence D.
Johnson, PE
Subcontractor
s:
TJC & Associates
BSK Associates
Subtronic
Presidio Systems
Towill
Maritime Sanitary Sewer Compliance
Schaaf & Wheeler was contracted by the Port of Oakland
to provide sewer system rehabilitation design services.
The project included partnering in design with Black &
Veatch and other subconsultants to address the
requirement of the Port of Oakland’s sewer compliance
program.
We prepared the PS&E and construction bid documents of
force mains,
and various sizes of gravity mains and
laterals for replacement or rehabilitation by various means.
Installation and rehabilitation methods include trenched and trenchless methods. This included coordination with subconsultants for ancillary tasks, including utility location and potholing, field surveying, and geotechnical
investigation.
The project also included design for lift station upgrades.
As part of the design, our firm performed a hydraulic/flow calculation and modeling of lift stations upstream and
downstream for sizing wet well storage volume to ensure the system is integrated to prevent overflows. During this analysis we determined one lift station could be
abandoned with a shift in operation.
Our engineers reviewed existing data, conducted field
investigations, performed CCTV on approximately 1,000
feet of pipe, performed utility loca
ting efforts including
electronic potholing, potholing, and ground penetrating radar, to validated rehabilitation recommendations for
these projects and expand the existing utility database.
Design is complete on the first two phases of the project, and design of the third phase was completed in July 2023.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
References
Schaaf & Wheeler 13
Client and Contact:
Laura Webb, PE, Associate
Engineer
City of San Mateo Public Works
Department
330 W. 20th Ave.
San Mateo, CA 94403
(650) 522
-7322
[email protected]
Contract Value: $1,064,167
Construction Cost: $9.8M
Project Duration: 2017 –
Current (multiple phases)
Team Members:
Benjamin L. Shick, PE; Glen M.
Anderson, PE; Curran L. Price,
PE; Larry D. Johnson, PE
Jonathan F. Ondracek
Subcontractors:
MTH Engineering
Biggs Cardosa
Cornerstone Earth Group
Kier+Wright
East San Mateo Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations
Rehabilitation
Schaaf & Wheeler performed condition assessments,
alternatives analysis, and design services for five sanitary sewer lift stations and the associated force mains for the City of San Mateo. Schaaf & Wheeler identified viable
options to eliminate two lift stations and extend the
adjacent gravit
y and force main systems. The selected
alternative included the following design elements:
Eliminate and abandon 2 lift stations
Replace 4 lift stations and their force mains
Extend gravity sewer mains and force mains to
accommodate lift station elimination
Schaaf & Wheeler is currently preparing design
documents to meet current City design preferences and
standards as well as to provide station reliability in
conformance to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) reliability requirements. Each lift
station will
have the capability to handle peak wet weather flow
(PWWF), an automatic alarm and communication system,
backup or redundant equipment (pumps, controls, and
power supply), and the ability to perform bypass pumping.
To adequately meet City stan
dards and reliability
requirements the following main components are proposed regardless of the selected alternatives:
New wet well and rail-mounted submersible pumps
New valve vault with bypass pumping connection
New control panel and electrical service equipment
Diesel Engine-Generator Set for standby power
where feasible
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
References
Schaaf & Wheeler 14
Client and Contact:
Paul Soo, Jr.
Stege Sanitary District
7500 Schmidt Lane
El Cerrito, CA 94530
(510
) 524-4668
[email protected]
Contract Value: $94,392
Construction Cost: To be bid in
2024
Project Duration: 2021 – 2024
Team Members:
PM: Lawrence D. Johnson, PE
Staff: Brett F. Crews, PE;
Benjamin L. Shick, PE
Subcontractors:
Kier + Wright
MTH Engineering
Canon Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Schaaf & Wheeler was contracted by Stege Sanitary
District to design the rehabilitation of the Canon Drive Sanitary Sewer Pump Station and appurtenances located
in Kensington, CA. These services included:
Basis of Design to determine peak wet weather
flow rate, conceptual site plan layout, and
proposed equipment for design of the pump station
rehabilitation;
Coordination with the District’s forcemain design
consultant for hydraulic calculations and tie-in with
pump station rehabilitation plans;
Conversion of Smith & Loveless style pump station
to a rail mounted submersible pump station within
an extremely small right-of-way; and
Coordination with PG&E for demolition of existing
pole mounted electrical service, accommodating an
existing gas main service and providing design
plans for new underground electrical service.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Corporate Structure, Organization
Schaaf & Wheeler 15
Corporate Structure, Organization
Schaaf & Wheeler is a civil engineering firm focused in water resources. With almost 40 years of commitment to solving flood control, stormwater, wastewater, potable water, and recycled water problems, Schaaf & Wheeler is recognized by public and private sector clients for its value- added engineering. We are certified as a small business enterprise by the State of California and operate from five locations: Santa Clara, San Francisco, Santa Rosa, Salinas, and Truckee.
Our firm is employee-owned and operated by 9 principals.
While work will be conducted primarily from our Santa Clara office, we can draw from resources at all five offices when necessary. We have 40 total employees, including 13 fully licensed engineers.
Schaaf & Wheeler has assembled a dedicated team of in-house engineers and subconsultants to complete the Lincoln Street Pump Station and Force Main project for the City, as indicated in our organization chart. A summary of key personnel and subconsultant roles and responsibilities is included below, with full resumes included in the following section.
Schaaf & Wheeler Team
Glen M. Anderson, PE: Project Manager
Glen is a vice president and owner at Schaaf & Wheeler. Through his time with Schaaf & Wheeler, he brings more than 17 years of experience in infrastructure modeling and planning, assessment; and design of wastewater conveyance systems, water supply and distribution systems and stormwater systems. Glen has served as principal-in-charge, project manager, and project engineer of gravity sewers, force mains, and sewage lift stations for public agencies throughout Northern California. Glen’s projects range fromsmall 2-inch water distribution QA/QC
QA/QC
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE
Project Manager
Project Manager
Glen M. Anderson, PE
Project Engineer
Project Engineer
Brett F. Crews, PE
Assistant Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Sandra E. Carroll, EIT
Geotechnical
Geotechnical
Haley & Aldrich
Structural
Structura
BCA
Electrical
Electrical
TJCAA
Surveying
Surveying
Kier + Wright
Permitting
Permitting
Montrose
Corrosion Protection
orrosion Protectio
JDH Corrosion
Principal
a -
al
-
in
n
-
n
n
-
Charge
Principa
a
al
-
i
n
n
n
-
Charge
C
C
Benjamin L. Shick, PE
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Corporate Structure, Organization
Schaaf & Wheeler 16
pipelines to 72-inch diameter storm drain pipe repairs to 61 MGD sewer pump stations. Glen is NASSCO PACP, MACP, and LACP Certified and is a Pump System Assessment Professional, as certified by the Hydraulic Institute.
As project manager, Glen will delegate project tasks to the team while maintaining the schedule and budget. He will also be involved in technical aspects of the project, where appropriate. Glen will meet regularly with the City as needed for project updates and to resolve any issues that arise during project development.
Benjamin L. Shick, PE: Principal-in-Charge
Ben is a vice president and an owner at Schaaf & Wheeler. He has more than 20 years of experience in infrastructure planning and design of wastewater, potable water systems, and stormwater. He has served as principal-in-charge and project manager of water and sewer mains, sewage lift stations, stormwater pumping stations, gravity sewers, flood plain investigation, shoreline protection studies, drainage studies, channel design and modeling, water rights permitting, wetland analysis and design, and small bridge design for local public agencies.
As principal-in-charge, Ben will provide technical supervision, peer review, and project oversight. He will also be responsible for contract negotiation and overall technical management for the duration of the project. He will work with Glen to maintain the project schedule and budget and assume ultimate responsibility for the quality of all work. He will work with City staff to make sure contractual issues are resolved.
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE: QA/QC
Larry is a senior project manager at Schaaf & Wheeler. He has more than 11 years of experience in pump stations assessment, hydraulic systems, urban water systems, groundwater hydraulics, open channel hydraulics, water wells and pumps and GIS applications to water resources. He has assessed more than 100 pump stations in the last five years and has recommended improvements and prepared design of improvements for many of them. Larry has experience in water transmission systems and specifications review.
In his role as QA/QC lead, Larry will provide internal technical review of project design documents and will be available for technical assistance throughout the project.
Brett F. Crews, PE: Project Engineer
Brett is an associate engineer with more than four years of experience in design and construction support for wastewater, stormwater, and potable water systems. He has successfully completed several multidisciplinary projects for public and private company clients in and around Northern California. Brett is also experienced in pressurized systems hydraulics, open channel hydraulics, and GIS applications in water resources. Brett is proficient in AutoCAD, ArcGIS, WaterCAD, InfoWater, InfoWater PRO, and InfoSWMM.
As project engineer, he will support Glen in day-to-day engineering tasks.
Sandra E. Carroll, EIT: Assistant Engineer
Sandy has two years of experience with hydraulic modeling, hydrology and hydraulics, water distribution systems, storm drain to sanitary sewer cross-connections, and pump station design.
She has worked on hydraulic modeling related to water system and fire flow analysis for water supply and infrastructure studies and master planning. Sandy also assists with EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Corporate Structure, Organization
Schaaf & Wheeler 17
development/construction reviews, C3 Compliance Inspections, and FEMA LOMR/CLOMR applications for development projects in San Joaquin, San Mateo, and Santa Clara County.
As assistant engineer, Sandy will assist Glen and Brett with day-to-day engineering.
About Our Subconsultants
Established in 1957, Haley & Aldrich (H&A) was the first geotechnical engineering practice in New England and now has 35 nationwide offices, including local offices in Walnut Creek, Oakland, San Jose, and an office/geotechnical testing laboratory in Hayward. Their projects include pump stations, sewer lines, treatment plants, and storm drain outfall repair and reconstruction projects completed for municipalities such as the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7 Water Agency, and the cities of Oakland, San Jose, Martinez, Lafayette, Orinda, and Moraga. H&A’s geotechnical expertise specifically related to pipeline projects has resulted in the involvement in numerous significant water and wastewater projects throughout California.
Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. (Biggs Cardosa) is a leading, award- winning California engineering firm that provides structural design, consulting, project management, and construction management services. For over 37 years Biggs Cardosa has been offering structural engineering design and special inspection services to engineers, public agencies, owners, and developers on a wide variety of projects. Biggs Cardosa’s staff have experience on hundreds of civil projects involving City, County, and State design requirements.
TJC and Associates, Inc. (TJCAA) is a small business enterprise providing engineering services to local Bay Area clients, as well as clients throughout the United States. TJCAA provides experience in design of infrastructure for water and wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, and reservoirs/tanks, as well as flood control structures, bridges, and support facilities. TJCAA operates from three fully equipped Northern California design offices in Concord, Oakland, and Sacramento. They have 22 current permanent staff members consisting of licensed professional electrical, control system, and structural engineers, designers, CAD, administrative and clerical personnel.
Kier + Wright (K+W) is a California corporation with offices in Livermore, Santa Clara, Sacramento, Irvine, Camarillo, Manteca, and Gilroy. Founded in 1972, they have over 230 employees, including 15 licensed land surveyors. They have completed more than 100 LEED-certified projects. They are trusted by many cities to bring their public improvements to life, including the City of Oakland, City of Stockton, City of Hayward, Town of Los Gatos, City of Dublin, City of Livermore, and many local municipalities such as Alameda County Public Works, Zone 7 Water Agency, and Alameda County Water District.
Montrose Environmental Solutions (Montrose) is a multidisciplinary environmental consulting firm that specializes in regulatory permitting, environmental studies, and CEQA and NEPA compliance, primarily for public works projects. Their team members are experts in environmental laws such as the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA), CEQA/NEPA, the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit, and other regulatory requirements EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Corporate Structure, Organization
Schaaf & Wheeler 18
and permitting. They have extensive project experience and expertise in aquatic and terrestrial biological resources; hydrology; geomorphology; water quality; wetlands; habitat conservation and restoration; and cultural resources. In particular, they are experts in projects that involve creeks, utility or stormwater infrastructure, culverts/bridges, and wetlands and other habitats.
JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc. (JDH Corrosion) is an
engineering company specializing in providing corrosion consulting services to clients in the fields of water and wastewater treatment and transmission, storage tanks, bridges, pier, piling and other off-shore marine structures, sheet pile walls, mining and minerals, aerospace, petroleum refining and distribution, electric power generation, transportation industry, municipalities and state and federal government agencies. JDH Corrosion specializes in conducting condition assessments, providing corrosion failure analysis, selection of materials for corrosive environments, cathodic protection design and engineering maintenance, stray current analysis, conducting corrosion research projects, selection and specification of protective coatings systems, failure analysis of protective coatings, construction inspection services and expert witness consulting in litigations.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Appendix A: Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Appendix A: Resumes
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Glen M. Anderson, PE has more than 17 years of experience in sanitary sewer system, potable water, and stormwater planning, assessment and design as well as the construction support and management associated with those projects. Glen has successfully completed work on several sanitary sewer main and trunk rehabilitation projects. He has worked on sanitary sewer pump station rehabilitation projects throughout the Bay Area.
Additionally, Glen has performed condition assessments for more than 150 sanitary sewer and stormwater pump stations. Glen’s potable water experience projects include the assessment and rehabilitation of booster pump stations, design of a water tanks and planning and design for potable water wells and pipelines. In addition to design, Glen has provided construction support and management services for a variety of projects, including wells, pipelines, storage tanks, pump stations, and generator installations.
Selected Project Experience
Wastewater Systems
Sanitary Sewer System
Assessment and Inventory
Port of Oakland
Sanitary Sewer System
Compliance Improvement
Design
Port of Oakland
Crestmoor and Lomita Pump
Stations and Forcemain
City of San Bruno
City of San Mateo Basin 2/3
– Pump Station
Rehabilitations
Stantec/City of San Mateo
Lift Stations J&K and D, F &
W
City of Morgan Hill
PSQ Reserve Flow and URD
Project
East Bay Municipal Utility
District
Assessment and Engineering
for Sanitary Sewer Main
Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
Force Main Appurtenance
Projects ESDC
Ross Valley Sanitary District
Cabrillo Avenue Sewer Main
Abandonment and
Replacement
City of Santa Clara
South Trunk Sewer Relief
Line
City of San Mateo
Madera Lift Stations (11 Lift
Stations
County of Madera
Mariner’s Island No. 5 and
No. 6 Pump Station
Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Repairs
City of Fontana
Pump Station Rehabilitations
City of Alameda
Sanitary Sewer Lift Station M
City of Morgan Hill
S. San Francisco Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station No. 8
Rehabilitation
City of S. San Francisco
City of San Mateo Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station
Assessment
City of San Mateo
Morgan Hill Trunk Sewer No.
2 City of Morgan Hill
Stormwater Systems
Baylands Stormwater Pump
Station No. 2
Education
BSCE, Civil and
Environmental Engineering,
University
of California,
Davis
Licenses
Registered Civil Engineer,
California C
76720
Certifications
Certified Pump System
Assessment Professional
NASSCO PACP, MACP, and
LACP Certified, Cert. No. U-
714
-06021855
Affiliations
American Water Works
Association
Glen M. Anderson,
PE Vice President
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
City of Sunnyvale
Rehabilitation of Failed 96”
Stormwater Corrugated Metal
Pipe
Town of Moraga
O’Connor Pump Station
Improvement Feasibility
Study and Design
City of East Palo Alto
Vista Bella Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Half Moon
Bay
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar
Citrix Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Santa Clara
Kier & Wright
Silviera Stormwater Pump
Station Design, Gilroy
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar
Sears Point Stormwater
Pump Stations Design, 2
Stations
Ducks Unlimited, Inc.
Marsten Pump Station
City of Burlingame
San Francisquito Creek
Stormwater Pump Station
City of Palo Alto
Blanco Drain Stormwater
Pump Station
Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
Hope Street Stormwater
Pump Station
City of San Jose
Baylands Stormwater Pump
Station No. 1
City of Sunnyvale
Water Delivery Systems
Curtner Road Booster Station
Rehabilitation
Alameda County Water
District
Oak and Jones Water
System Planning
Summerhill Homes
Water System Planning and
Design
Confidential Client
Country Club and Victoria
Water Booster Pump Stations
City of Petaluma
Cherry Creek Water Pump
Station
City of Hillsborough
Assessment of City Wells
City of Santa Clara
Water System Modeling and
Design
Great Oaks Water Company
Watkins Gate Well and
Pipeline Project
Marina Coast Water District
Well 34 Site Improvements
Marina Coast Water District
Shady Lane Water System
Improvement
San Jose Water Company
Stonegate Water Supply
Project
County of San Benito
San Jerardo Water System
Improvements
County of Monterey
Segunda Pump Station Pump
replacement
California American Water
El Torro Wells
California American Water
Valley Christian School Pump
Station Rehabilitation
Valley Christian School
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Benjamin L. Shick, PE has more than 20 years of experience in water resources infrastructure planning and design of wastewater conveyance systems, water supply and distribution systems, stormwater systems, and pump stations.
Ben has conducted floodplain investigation, shoreline protection studies, drainage studies, channel design and modeling, water rights permitting, wetland analysis and design, small bridge design, infrastructure design, surveying, construction management, and construction quality control testing. He has been involved with all project phases, from initiation to construction document preparation and construction support.
Selected Project Experience
Wastewater Systems
2023 Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation Project
City of Belmont
Frontage Road Force Main
Replacement
City of Mill Valley
Basin C Sewer Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
Basin E Sewer Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
West Valley Logistics
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
City of Fontana
El Camino Drive Sewer
Rehabilitation
Town of Corte Madera
FY 2020/21 Sewer
Assessment and Design
City of Mill Valley
2020 Sewer Repair and
Replacement Project
San Rafael Sanitary District
Sanitary Sewer Improvement
Project
City of Morgan Hill
Old County Road and El
Camino Sewer and Storm
Drain Improvements
City of Belmont
2020 Sewer Rehabilitation
Project
Town of Corte Madera
Woodland Avenue Sewer
Improvements
San Rafael Sanitary District
2019 Sewer Repair Project
City of Mill Valley
El Camino Sewer
Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo
FY 2019/20 Force Main
Appurtenance Project
Ross Valley Sanitary District
North Road Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station and Force
Main
City of Belmont
East San Mateo Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station
City of San Mateo
Ocean Colony Pump Station
and Force Main Design
City of Half Moon Bay
Sewer Main and Water Main
Replacement
Mid-Peninsula Water District
& City of Belmont
Sanitary Sewer Lift Station
Rehabilitation Design
City of San Mateo
Wastewater Pump Stations
Assessment
Delta Diablo
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
and Replacement
Rehabilitation Projects
City of Belmont
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
Project
City of San Mateo
Benjamin L. Shick, PE
Vice President
Education
BSCE, Montana State
University
-Bozeman
MSCE, Montana State
University
-Bozeman
Licenses
Registered Civil Engineer
California C68813
Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Floodplain Management
Association
Software
AutoCAD, WaterCAD, HEC-
RAS, HEC-HMS, GeoRAS,
MOUSE, ArcGIS 9.0
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Force Main Appurtenance
Projects
Ross Valley Sanitary District
On-Call Mechanical
Engineering Services for
Stormwater Pump Stations
City of Alameda
Sewer and Pump Station
Maintenance Services
City of Half Moon Bay
Pump Station Improvements
Project
City of Oakland
Northside & Rabello Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Bypass
& Meter Relocation
City of Santa Clara
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Evaluation and Design
Town of Hillsborough
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Evaluation
Ross Valley Sanitary District
Pump Station Review and
Recommendations
Sewer Authority Mid-
Coastside
Cabrillo Avenue Sewer Main
Abandonment and
Replacement
City of Santa Clara
Citywide Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Rehabilitation
City of Fontana
Rehabilitation Design of 32
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
City of Alameda
Mariner’s Island #5 and #6
Pump Station Replacement
City of San Mateo
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Evaluation
City of Santa Clara
Citywide Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Study
City of San Mateo
El Camino Real Sanitary
Sewer Improvement Project
BRE Properties, Inc./City of
Santa Clara
Kingridge Sanitary Sewer
Improvement Project
City of San Mateo
Alameda Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Assessment
City of Alameda
E. Garrison Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station and Sewer
Main Replacement
Marina Coast Water District
Calabazas Creek Sewer
Siphon Design
City of Santa Clara (2009)
Stormwater Planning and
Design
Laurel Ave Storm Drain
Improvement Project
City of Larkspur
2022 Storm Drain
Improvements
Town of Corte Madera
Large Full Trash Capture
Device Project
City of Hayward
Storm Drain Pump Station
Assessment
City of Larkspur
MCSTOPP Full Trash
Capture Device Project
City of San Rafael
Old County Road Storm
Drain Improvements
City of Belmont
NEI Stormwater Pump
Station Design
City of Tracy
Storm Drain Pump Station
Improvements
City of Alameda
Los Gamos Storm Drain
Alternatives
City of San Rafael
Storm Drain Rehabilitation
Design
City of Belmont
Water System Design
Trevarno Rd Water
Improvements
City of Livermore
Ralphine Tank Water Quality
and Piping Evaluation
Sonoma Water
Old County Road Water Main
Improvements
Mid-Peninsula Water District
Water Main Replacement
Mid-Peninsula Water District
Long-Term Capital Needs
Assessment
Caspar Services Company
El Camino Water and Sewer
Replacement
City of Santa Clara
D&E Reservoir Design and
Construction Management
Marina Coast Water District
Well #10 Rehabilitation
Marina Coast Water District
Karns Hillside Addition Water
System Design
Jackson Hole, WY
Teton Springs Water System
Design
Teton Springs Real Estate
Hydrology, Hydraulics, and
Floodplain Management
Calwater Tank Overflow
Analysis
City of San Mateo
Miller Middle School Flood
Study
Nyberg Architects
Dilworth & De Vargas School
Flood Study
Cornerstone Earth Group
Airport Flood Protection
Project
City of Livermore
Belmont Marburger Flood
Study
Colantuono, Highsmith &
Whatley, PC
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Lawrence D. Johnson, PE has more than 11 years of experience with hydraulic systems, urban water systems, groundwater hydraulics, open channel hydraulics, water wells and GIS applications to water resources. In addition, Larry has extensive knowledge in pump station design and assessment. Larry also has experience in floodplain hydraulics, mapping, CLOMR/LOMR applications, and floodplain impact assessments.
Selected Project Experience
Pump Stations
599 Airpark SDPS
Kier & Wright/ Stockton
Mariposa N4 SDPS
Kier & Wright/ Stockton
Shoreline Irrigation PS
Condition Assessment
City of Mountain View
Wilson SDPS Basis of
Design Report
City of Petaluma
Soquel SDPS Basis of
Design Report
City of Santa Cruz
Soquel SDPS Feasibility
Study
City of Santa Cruz
Ferry Point Lift Station
City of Richmond
Kings Village Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Design
Devcon
Vista Cove Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Design
Sancerra/City of Vallejo
NEI Stormwater Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright/City of Tracy
NEI Sanitary Sewer Pump
Station
Prologis
Duke Realty Stormwater
Pump Station
Kier & Wright
Napa Logistics Building 4
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
Design
Kier & Wright
Sanchez Stormwater Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright
901 Kifer Road Stormwater
Pump Station Design
Kier & Wright
Alvarado Commerce Center
Stormwater Pump Design
Kier & Wright
2000 Marina Stormwater
Pump Stations Design
Kier & Wright
Coleman Highline
Stormwater Pump Stations
Kier & Wright
NVIDIA Stormwater Pump
Stations
Kier & Wright
North Loop Road Stormwater
Pump Station Design
Kier & Wright
Morton North Stormwater
Pump Stations Design
Kier & Wright
2701 West Winton Avenue
Stormwater Pump Station
Design
Kier & Wright
Wind River Way Stormwater
Pump Station Design
Kier & Wright
Pear Avenue Stormwater
Pump Station Design
Kier & Wright
Hall Road Stormwater Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright
San Fernando Street
Stormwater Pump Station
Design
Education
BSCE, California Polytechnic
State University, San Luis
Obispo
MSCE California Polytechnic
State University, San Luis
Obispo
Licenses
Registered Civil Engineer,
California 84183
Software
WaterCAD, StormCAD,
InfoWater
,I n f o S W M M ,
AutoCAD, ArcGIS, FLO-2D,
EPANET, EPASWMM, HEC-
RAS, HEC-HMS, HEC1,
HEC2
Lawrence D.
Johnson, PE Senior
Engineer
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Kier & Wright
Sunrise Senior Living Center
Stormwater Pump Stations
Design
Kier & Wright
Napa Logistics Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station Design
City of American Canyon
Mountain View Shoreline
Sewer Pump Station
Improvements Design
City of Mountain View
Stanford Codiga Resource
Center Sewer Pump Station
Assessment
Stanford University
Stanford East Campus
Stormwater Pump Station
Stanford University
Stanford Lakehouse Pump
Station Design
Stanford University
Facebook MPR 29
Stormwater Pump Design
Kier & Wright/Facebook
Facebook MPK 22
Stormwater Pump Design
Kier & Wright/Facebook
Facebook MPK 21 Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright/Facebook
Infomart Building B Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright/Infomart Data
Centers
Stevenson Place Mid Pen
Storm Drain Pump Station
Design
Civil Engineering
Associates/City of Fremont
Wren Avenue / Cambridge
Place Stormwater Pump
Stations
RJA/City of Gilroy
Centercal “The Veranda”
Stormwater and Sanitary
Sewer Pump Station
Kier & Wright/City of Concord
DCT Industrial Stormwater
Pump Station
Kier & Wright/City of Tracy
Santa Clara Square Phase 2
Stormwater Pump Stations
Preston Pipelines/City of
Santa Clara
Sanitary Sewer Pump Station
& Trunk Alternative Study
City of Mountain View
Home Ranch Pump Station
Gippetti Pump Stations
RJA/City of Gilroy
Bass Lake Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Rehabilitation
CSA 2A and 2B, County of
Madera
Santa Clara Gateway Pump
Station Review (2 Pump
Stations)
Santa Clara
Watson Ranch Sewer Pump
Station
ECSC Corp.
Hydraulics and Hydrology
Ciolino Trash Capture Design
Mark Thomas/City of Morgan
Hill
New Horizons Hydrology
RJA/City of Morgan Hill
16720 Monterey Road Flood
Study
RAMCAM/City of Morgan Hill
Tarob Court Flood Study
True Life Company/City of
Milpitas
The Crossings at Monterey
Flood Study
Hanna Brunetti/City of
Morgan Hill
Rancho Vista Flood Study
VVH Consulting/City of San
Juan Bautista
Lower Penitencia Creek
Improvements Project
Wood Rogers/SCVWD
16770 Monterey Road Flood
Study
City of Morgan Hill
Laurel Creek Hydraulic
Modeling
City of Hillsdale
Centre Point Drive Flood
Analysis and FEMA
Applications
City of Milpitas
McCandless Drive Flood
Analysis and CLOMR
Appliation
City of Milpitas
KB Homes, Piper Drive
Floodplain Analysis and
FEMA Applications
City of Milpitas
Silicon Valley BART
Extension Floodplain
Analysis
Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority
Water Delivery Systems
Geomax Onsite Water
RJA/City of Milpitas
Fairfield Onsite Water
RJA/City of Fairfield
Piercy Fire Flow Analysis
Kier & Wright/San Jose
Point Richmond Onsite Water
Analysis
RJA/City of Richmond
Memorex Fire Flow Analysis
HMH/Santa Clara
Evergreen Circle Onsite
Water Analysis
Kier & Wright/San Jose
4th and Grant Onsite Water
Analysis
Novato
Jones and Oak Onsite Water
Analysis
RJA/Walnut Creek
Springhill Suites Fire Flow
Analysis
RJA/Pleasanton
San Felipe Ranch Onsite
Water Surge Modeling
Morgan Hill
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Brett F. Crews has over four years of experience in the assessment, design, and construction support of pump stations for wastewater, stormwater, and potable water systems. He has successfully managed and completed several multidisciplinary water, sewer, and stormwater projects for public and private company clients throughout the Bay Area.
Brett is skilled in preparation of detailed plans, specifications, and estimates for bidding and construction of pump stations, wells, tanks, pipelines, and generator installations for public agencies.
Brett is also experienced in providing CEQA support for public water and wastewater systems. He has provided lead modeling for analysis of Capital Improvement Project with respect to developments, precise plans, and master plans.
Selected Project Experience
Design & Construction
Bowers Sewer Pump Station
Improvements
City of Santa Clara
Ferry Point Sewer Pump
Station Improvements
City of Richmond
Sanitary Sewer System
Compliance Improvement
Design
Port of Oakland
Utility Assessment and
Inventory
Port of Oakland
Laurelwood Stormwater
Pump Station
City of Santa Clara
Canon Sewer Pump Station
Stege Sanitary District
Broadway Terrace I/I
Reduction Stormdrain
Improvements
City of Oakland
Curtner Road Booster Station
Rehabilitation
Alameda County Water
District
Country Club and Victoria
Water Booster Pump Stations
City of Petaluma
Kings Village Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station Design
Devcon Construction Inc.
Salinas AG Pump Stations
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar
14800 W Schulte Fire and
Domestic Well Systems &
Septic Systems
LBA Realty/Kier & Wright
Napa Logistics Sewer Pump
Station Replacement
Kier & Wright/City of
American Canyon
NEI Detention Basin Pump
Station
Kier & Wright/City of Tracy
Chrysler Storm Drain Pump
Station
City of Menlo Park
Sanchez Stormwater Pump
Station Design
Kier & Wright
Planning and Modeling
CEQA Support Utility Impact
Studies
City of Mountain View
On-Call Water and
Wastewater Modeling
Support
City of Mountain View
On-Call Water and
Wastewater Modeling
Support
Marina Coast Water District
CEQA Specific Plan Utility
Impact Study
City of East Palo Alto
Water Supply Assessments
City of Mountain View
City of Sunnyvale
City of East Palo Alto
Education
BSCE, California Polytechnic
State University, San Luis
Obispo
Licenses
California Registered
Engineer #
94676
Software
AutoCAD, ArcGIS,
InfoSWMM, InfoWater,
InfoWater Pro
Brett F. Crews, PE
Associate Engineer
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Resumes
Schaaf & Wheeler
Sandra Carroll has over three years of experience in planning, design, and construction support for wastewater, stormwater, and potable water systems. She acts as a primary modeler for the development and analysis of Capital Improvement Projects with respect to developments, precise plans, and master plans.
Sandra also regularly assists with development/construction reviews, C3 SWMP reviews and inspections, and CEQA support for private development projects in San Joaquin, San Mateo, and Santa Clara County.
Selected Project Experience
Pump Station Design
Mariposa Industrial Park
SDPS
Kier + Wright/ City of
Stockton
Fairfield Industrial Center
SDPS
Kier + Wright
Redwood Tech SSPS
Kier + Wright
Facebook Dumbarton
Campus SDPS
Kier + Wright
Vista Cove SSPS
Sansara
Sanitary Sewer Planning and
Design
CEQA Utility Impact Studies
and On Call Sanitary Sewer
Modeling Support
City of Mountain View
Sources of Storm Water
Inflow into Sanitary System
Study
City of Sunnyvale
Potable Water Planning and
Design
Castroville Seawater
Intrusion Project Water
System Analysis
E2 Consulting Engineers,
Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
LLNL Site 300 Zone 3 Water
System Improvement Design
and Modeling Support
Kier + Wright, Lawrence
Livermore National
Laboratory
Sandia National Laboratories
Campus Water System
Modeling and Planning
Kier + Wright, Sandia
National Laboratories
Jones and Oak Road Water
System Modeling and Design
Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar,
Summerhill Homes
Stormwater Planning and
Design
Comprehensive Stormwater
Plan
Marin City
Floodplain Management/Sea
Level Rise Protection
OneShoreline Coastal
Protection Analysis Report
San Mateo County Flood and
Sea Level Rise Resiliency
District
Valley Water Calabazas-San
Tomas Aqyubi Creek Marsh
Connection Project
Stillwater
Development Review and
Management
Third Party C3 SWMP
Reviews and Inspections
Numerous Clients
Foster City on-call
Development Review and
Construction Review
City of Foster City
Foster City Water, Sewer,
and Storm Drain Standard
Detail Updates
City of Foster City
Education
BSCE, University of
California, Davis
Licenses
Engineer-in-Training 173398
Software
InfoWorks ICM, WaterCAD,
AutoCAD Civil 3D
, ArcGIS
Pro
Sandra Carroll, EIT
Assistant Engineer
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
DAN PELUSO, P.E., G.E., ENV SP
Principal Consultant
EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering (Geotechnical), San Jose State University, 1987 B.A., Geological Sciences, University of California at Santa Barbara, 1983
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
1992/ CA: Civil Engineer (Reg. No. 49562)
1997/ CA: Geotechnical Engineer (Reg. No. 2367)
Certified Envision Sustainability Professional (ENV SP)
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineers (ISSMGE) American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), Director, Chapter Past President Dan has spent his 37-year geotechnical engineering career on a variety of projects relating to large public infrastructures, such as bridges, highways, rail and light rail, tunnels, water treatment plants, and flood control facilities, including dams, levees, and channels. He has prepared foundation reports for several highway bridges in Northern and Central California as well as a long-span bridge at the Port of Long Beach. Dan’s experience also includes interfacing with Caltrans on state and locally funded projects and pipeline projects within the Caltrans right-of-way. He has been the lead geotechnical engineer for several large corporate campuses, schools, and commercial developments. In addition, Dan has continued to foster relationships with key water agency clients, numerous process design consultants, and many wastewater treatment plants around the Bay Area. He is a certified Envision Sustainability Professional and has been an adjunct lecturer in the civil engineering departments at both Santa Clara University and San Jose State University.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Pipeline and Sewers
Felton Booster Pump Station, Santa Cruz County, California. Dan provided geotechnical investigation for the new Felton Booster Pump Station. The analysis included liquefaction and lateral spreading evaluations. The design included mitigation of significant lateral spreading and liquefaction-induced settlement hazards using a compaction-grouting technique of ground improvement.
San Lorenzo Valley Water District c/o Schaaf and Wheeler, Water Main Replacement, Santa Cruz County, California.
As geotechnical engineer, Dan provided geotechnical design services to Schaaf & Wheeler for the 2019 pipeline project, which is owned and maintained by SLVWD. The project included five pipeline segments located in the Santa Cruz Mountains. The purpose of H&A’s geotechnical investigation was to assess the existing surface and subsurface conditions along the planned pipeline alignments, develop geotechnical design recommendations, and prepare a geotechnical design report for the proposed installation of the new water pipelines.
Santa Cruz Sanitation District, East Cliff Sewer, Santa Cruz, California. H&A provided geotechnical design recommendations to the Santa Cruz Sanitation District for the East Cliff Drive Sewer Replacement Project. The project included abandoning the existing 15-inch asbestos cement pipe (ACP) in place and constructing a new high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sanitary sewer line with diameters ranging from 18- to 20-inches. The replacement pipeline extended approximately 4,200 feet. The new pipeline is to be constructed to depths ranging from about 7 to 28 feet below the ground surface, utilizing both open trench and trenchless techniques. H&A’s work consisted of performing a subsurface investigation and preparing geotechnical recommendations for excavations, shoring, dewatering, pipe boring and jacking, pavement design, and associated earthwork.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
DAN PELUSO, P.E., G.E., ENV SP
PAGE 2
haleyaldrich.com
City of Pacifica, Crespi Sanitary Sewer Main Repair, Pacifica, California. As a specialty subconsultant, H&A completed a geotechnical study and design for cut and cover and trenchless replacement of 800 feet of collapsed 12-inch high- density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe beneath an existing parking lot serving a restaurant and need to remain open.
Development of geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the part cut-and-cover, part trenchless realignment, and replacement of the existing pipe, including recommendations for bore and jack installation of the trenchless portion of the pipe and the launching and receiving shafts in the parking lot.
EKI Environment & Water, Clayton Regency Water Pipeline, Contra Costa County, California. Dan was the project manager and geotechnical engineer for a geotechnical investigation for a 3-mile-long water supply pipeline for a residential community east of Mt. Diablo in rural Contra Costa County, California. Fieldwork included drilling 48 borings along Marsh Creek Road with highly variable soil/b edrock conditions, requiring full-time traffic control. The investigation was performed to characterize subsurface conditions and assess the excavatability of bedrock along the proposed pipeline alignment. Dan provided recommendations for excavation in soil and cemented sandstone bedrock, backfill material, compaction, and pavement restoration.
City of Hayward c/o Hydroscience, City of Hayward Sewer and Water Line Improvement Project, Hayward, California. Haley & Aldrich provided preliminary geotechnical engineering services to HydroScience Engineers (HydroScience) for the City of Hayward Sewer and Water Line Improvement Project throughout the City of Hayward, California. The project is comprised of the replacement or rehabilitation of selected sewer pipeline segments. The pipeline segments were constructed over time throughout the City, which ultimately degraded and required rehabilitation or replacement. The prime consultant (HydroScience) performed a condition assessment of the pipeline segments, while Haley & Aldrich helped characterize the geologic and soil conditions throughout the City of Hayward.
Haley & Aldrich’s desktop study provided regional geologic and soil engineering data and preliminary geotechnical recommendations for underground pipeline trench excavation, shoring design, and construction. Haley & Aldrich later provided focused subsurface exploration in specific areas of concern, including an area requiring trenchless pipeline installation beneath BART tracks.
City of Sunnyvale c/o MNS Engineers, Inc., City of Sunnyvale Annual Sanitary Sewer Repairs Project, Sunnyvale, California. Haley & Aldrich has provided preliminary geotechnical engineering services to MNS Engineers, Inc. (MNS) for the City of Sunnyvale Annual Sanitary Sewer Repairs Project located throughout the City of Sunnyvale, California.
The project is comprised of the replacement or rehabilitation of selected sewer pipeline segments. The pipeline segments were constructed over time throughout the City, which ultimately degraded and required rehabilitation or replacement. The prime (MNS) performed a condition assessment of the pipeline segments to assess whether rehabilitation or replacement was needed. At the same time, Haley & Aldrich helped characterize the geologic and soil conditions in the City of Sunnyvale. Haley & Aldrich’s desktop study provided regional geologic and soil engineering data and preliminary geotechnical recommendations for underground pipeline trench excavation, shoring design, and construction.
City of Palo Alto c/o RMC and Woodard & Curran, Water Delivery System Phase III, Palo Alto, California. Dan was the lead geotechnical engineer for the Phase III Recycled Water Project, located in Palo Alto. This project will include a recycled water distribution system throughout the City of Palo Alto, extending uphill and westward from the Palo Alto WPCP near Highway 101 to Deer Creek Road. The system consists of a main recycled water pipeline and multiple laterals to extend approximately 11.3 miles along various roadways. Up to ten trenchless under crossings have been identified, including where the alignment is to cross underneath Highway 101, El Camino Real (Hwy 82), Caltrain railways, Foothill Expressway, and several creeks. A booster pump station is to be located at a parking lot near the intersection of El Camino Real and Page Mill Road. Future work will include extensive subsurface exploration along proposed pipeline alignments and trenchless crossings.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Francisco Castillo, PE
Engineering Manager, Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc.
Francisco Castillo has over 20 years of experience in the design of transportation-related structures including new construction, rehabilitation and/or seismic retrofit of various rail bridge structures, highway bridges, pedestri an bridges, retaining walls and soundwall structures.
Francisco’s responsibilities include development of structure concepts, leading the structural analysis and design team, devel opment of construction drawings and details, preparation of specifications, independent quality control reviews and oversight of design engineers.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Sanitary Sewage Pump Station No. 2 Rehabilitation, South San Francisco, CA: Project Engineer for the design and rehabilitation of an existing sanitary sewer pump station. The project includes the design of improvemen ts to the below ground grinder box, the existing pump station building, a new hoist crane structure and new concrete retaining walls and decorative cladding.
Sanitary Sewage Pump Station No. 1, South San Francisco, CA: Project Engineer for the design and construction of a new electrical /generator masonry building. The project includes the design of below ground wet well and grinder box reinforced concrete structures.
Fontana Pump Station Assessment and Rehabilitation, Fontana, CA: Project Engineer for the structural assessment of six and re habilitation of three sanitary sewer pump stations at various locations in the City.
Shoreline Sewage Lift Station , Mountain View, CA: Proje ct Engineer for structural assessment and rehabilitation of an existi ng three story, concrete sewage lift station building and site facilities.
Crestmoor Drive Pump Station Rehabilitation, San Bruno, CA: Project Engineer for the structural assessment of an existing masonry and timber framed sanitary sewer pump station.
San Jose Trash Capture Device Installation Project, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer for the design and construction of below ground reinforced concrete trash capture facility for the collection and removal of trash from storm water. The Project received a 2019 APWA Silicon Valley Chapter Honor Award and a Commen dation Award at the 2019 ACEC Engineering Excellence Awards.
Citywide Trash Capture Project Phase 1, Mountain View, CA: Project Engineer for existing storm drainage system modifications to accommodate a new trash capture device. Project received a 2019 APWA Silicon Valley Chapter Honor Award.
Baylands Pump Station No. 2 Rehabilitation, Sunnyvale, CA: Project Engineer for s tructural assessment and rehabilitation of storm water pump station facilities including a masonry mechanical/electrical building, multiple shaft below grade wet well, inlet and outlet structures and site retaining walls. Project received a 2019 APWA Silicon Valley Chapter Honor Award.
City-Wide Bridge and Culvert Structur al Assessment and Rehabilitation , Mountain View, CA: Team Lead for the structural assessment of forty timber, steel and concrete bridge and box culvert structures.
City-Wide Bridge Assessment, Palo Alto, CA: Team Lead for the structural assessment of 60 City-owned bridge and culvert structures to assist the City with management of these transportation resources.
REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer
(Civil) CA C71678
EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering,
University of California at
Berkeley
M.S. Structural
Engineering, University
of California at Berkeley
Years with BCA
10 Total Years Experience
21 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Anthony Notaro, PE
Associate, Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc.
Anthony Notaro joined Biggs Cardosa in 1991, after serving with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He has over 30 years of experience in structural engineering with an emphasis on transportation and infrastructure proje cts. He has been a Project Manager on numerous infrastructure and transportation pr ojects including pedestrian, vehicular, and rail bridge structures, retaining walls, and various hydraulic structures including levees, floodwalls and flood protection structures, dr ainage channels, tanks, pump stations, junction boxes, and creek trail facilities.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Leong Drive Water and Sewer Main Replacement Project , Mountain View, CA:
Structures Project Manager for the design and construction support related to excavation shoring in support of sewer main replacement. The project received an “APWA Silicon Valley for Project of the Year” award.
Fontana Pump Station Assessment and Rehabilitation, Fontana, CA: Project Manager for the structural assessment of six and re habilitation of three sanitary sewer pump stations at various locations in the City.
Sanitary Sewage Pump Station No. 1, South San Francisco, CA: Project Manager for the design and construction of a new electrical /generator masonry building. The project includes the design of below ground wet well and grinder box reinforced concrete structures.
Mariner’s Island #2 Sewage Pump Station Rehabilitation, San Mateo, CA: Engineering Manager for upgrade of existing underground sewage pump station facilities.
South San Francisco Pump Station No. 2, 3 & 10, South San Francisco, CA: Engineering Manager for upgrade of three existing sanitary sewer buildings and site facilities.
Sanitary Sewage Pump Station No. 4 , South San Francisco, CA: Engineering Manager for upgrade of an existing substandard concrete wet well and modification to the existing concrete and masonry sanitary sewer pump station building and site facilities.
Shoreline Sewage Lift Station , Mountain View, CA: Project manager for structural assessment and subsequent rehabilitation of an existing three story, concrete sewage lift station building and site facilities.
Crestmoor Drive Pump Station Rehabilitation, San Bruno, CA: Project Manager for the structural assessment of an existing masonry and timber framed sanitary sewer pump station.
South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Relief Line, San Mateo, CA: Engineering Manager for the design of sanitary sewer junction boxes and sanitary sewer siphon structures.
Metcalf Pipeline Project, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for the modification of two bridges (over Coyote Creek and Silver Creek) to accommodate twin 20 inch and a single 24 inch recycled waterline.
City-Wide Bridge and Culvert Structur al Assessment and Rehabilitation , Mountain View, CA: Project Manager for the structural assessment of forty timber, steel and concrete bridge and box culvert structures.
City-Wide Bridge Assessment, Palo Alto, CA: Project Manager for the structural assessment of 60 City-owned bridge and culvert structures to assist the City with management of these transportation resources.
REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer
(Civil) CA C51739
EDUCATION
B.S. Architectural
Engineering, California
Polytechnic State
University, San Luis
Obispo
Engineer Officers Basic
Course, United States
Army Corps of Engineers
Years with BCA:
30 Total Years Experience:
32 EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
TJC and Associates, Inc. Anne M. Broughton, P.E.
Anne M. Broughton, P.E.
Senior Electrical Engineer
Experience
Anne Broughton, a licensed engineer since 1992, has extensive expertise in high, medium, and low-voltage electrical systems, switching station/power plant engineering and construction, and other major capital project engineering. She also has experience in management, design, and construction of oil and gas production and processing, with experience worldwide. Her specific experience includes the following:
z Rinconada WTP Reliability Improvement Project; Valley Water, Los Gatos, CA; Senior Electrical Engineer. Electrical engineering design work for a $180 million WTP modernization. Design included new 12 kV distribution, arc flash protection strategies, a new 3 MW diesel standby generator, and new distributed MCCs with smart motor starters and VFD equipment.
z Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Phase II Expansion; City of Brentwood, CA; Senior Electrical Engineer. Electrical and I&C design services for expansion of a WWTP to 12.8 MGD. Electrical design elements include replacing the existing 480 V main service with a new 21 kV primary distribution service and coordinating with PG&E to support the new processes.
Electrical improvements included new distribution equipment, motor control centers, a second standby generator, and fire alarm system expansion, as well as novel submersible variable frequency drives for the aeration basin mixers. Providing ESDC.
z Monterey and Seaside Pump Stations Upgrade Project; Monterey One Water, Marina, CA; Project Manager. Electrical design for replacement of 480 Volt electrical equipment, including power distribution, motor control centers, switchgear, variable frequency drives, and controls at the Monterey and Seaside Pump Stations; electrical design for replacement of two 1,200 kW standby generators for the Seaside pump station and a portable generator connection at the Monterey Pump Station.
z Lift Station Upgrades; Port of Oakland, CA; Project Manager. Electrical and I&C design for lift station upgrades distributed across 3 projects. The Port of Oakland is upgrading lift station equipment, including the installation of new pumps, new instrumentation and controls, floats/level transducers, and modifying/adding remote monitoring/alarm notification systems. Design includes replacement of existing control panels, and installation of intrinsically safe barrier equipment, and upgrades to the portable standby generator connection and transfer switch. Providing ESDC.
z Stormwater Pump Station Rehabilitation; Alameda County Flood Control and Water District, Oakland, CA; Project Manager. Electrical and I&C design for the Ettie Street and the Lake Merritt Pump Stations. The project includes upgrading pumps and pump controls, interlocking of loads while the station(s) are on standby generator power, coordination with PG&E regarding utility service requirements, removal and replacement of equipment that has reached the end of useful life, and development of construction sequences.
z Cypress Pump Station; City of Redding, CA; Project Manager.
Design of a permanent pump station to replace the temporary Cypress Pump Station in downtown Redding, adjacent to City Hall. The project includes installation of one 400 hp motor, VFD drive and station services for a new pump station building. Electrical and I&C design includes the addition of a new switchboard, and determination of SCADA requirements, coordination with City of Redding Electrical Utility and Operations staff. An Arc Flash Study will also be completed.
Education
BS, Electrical
Engineering;
San Francisco State
University, San
Francisco, CA; 1988
Professional
Registrations
Electrical:
CA 13842
NV 27496
TX 99727
Chartered Engineer:
MIET, UK
Professional
Certification
Lean Sigma Green
Belt
Professional
Memberships
Institute of Electrical
and Electronics
Engineers
Office Address
1111 Broadway
Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94607
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
TJC and Associates, Inc. Daniel Moreno
Daniel Moreno
Electrical Designer
Experience
Daniel Moreno is an electrical designer who has been building experience since 2009 in controls, automation, and protection systems design and implementation. As part of TJCAA’s Instrumentation, Controls, and Electrical Group, he provides design services and evaluation for facilities such as water and wastewater treatment plants, pump and lift stations, and compressed natural gas filling stations. Mr. Moreno also performs field investigations and modeling using the SKM suite of software. His certification in Project Management recognizes his extensive experience leading and directing cross-functional teams to deliver projects on schedule and within budget, delivering quality work products, and being responsible for all aspects of projects.
His broad skillset includes design and hands-on commissioning of building management systems. His background includes product engineering in a manufacturing environment for customer-oriented control and protection solutions of high-voltage power transformer and mobile substations. Mr. Moreno’s construction experience in the telecommunications industry comprises enhancement, deployment, and expansion of fiber-optic and copper networks. His specific experience includes the following:
z Preliminary Design of WWTP Improvements; Mt. View Sanitary District; Martinez, CA; Electrical Designer. Predesign engineering to establish, define, and develop design criteria in a Preliminary Design Report for plant-wide improvements at a WWTP. Improvements will focus on replacing aging equipment, installing new equipment, and upgrading some electrical and SCADA systems in the following areas: headworks, centrifuge, digester, influent pump station, and other areas with ongoing issues.
z Chrysler Pump Station; City of Menlo Park, CA; Electrical Designer.
Performed ESDC for stormwater pump station build. Reviewed shop drawings and cataloged data required to submit from contractors in accordance with contract documents.
z Salinas Industrial Wastewater Pump Station; City of Salinas, CA; Electrical Designer. Electrical, instrumentation, and controls design for a replacement pump station. Field investigations, development of a Basis of Design Report, and development of drawings and specifications. Electrical design elements included new PG&E service, distribution, instrumentation, and control for three 45 hp pumps, new odor control system, new control panel, and remote communication to the City’s SCADA.
z White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility, Electrical Improvements; City of Lodi, CA; Project Engineer. Designing upgrades to the electrical and plant-wide control system for the majority of plant processes. Project includes new medium-voltage (12 kV and 13.3 kV) distribution with new pad-mount distribution transformers, new 480 V main-tie-main source transfer switchgear, new main-tie-main MCCs, allocation of process load trains on split-bus MCCs, feasibility analysis, and final design for contingency standby power source.
Control system upgrades included replacement of end-of-life Rockwell Automation PLC-5 platforms with new CompactLogix units in a highly distributed control topology and connection of new controllers with a new plant-wide, single-mode, fiber-optic network backbone and wireless access. TJCAA will provide ESDC. z Preliminary Design and Standby Power Planning; City of Pleasanton, CA; Electrical Designer. Preliminary design for replacement of stationary diesel engine generators at Lift Stations 7 and 8 and development of a systemwide strategy for portable generators used to support sites throughout the city with the objective of providing extended standby power capability to meet water supply reliability requirements during the PG&E Public Safety Power Shutdown program. Strategy addresses 12 potable water pump stations, 10 sewer pump stations, and 4 stormwater pump stations.
Education
BS, Electrical
Engineering;
University of Texas
at El Paso; 2006
Associate of Science;
El Paso Community
College; 2005
Certifications
Project Management
Professional, UC
Berkeley
OSHA 30
NFPA 70E
Specialized
Training
SKM, Electrical
Schematic & Control
Design
Office Address
1111 Broadway
Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94607
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Licenses + Registrations
PLS, California
Years Experience
26 PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Atascadero Creek Capacity
Restoration Project,
Atascadero, CA
Schaaf + Wheeler
Shoreline Pump Station As-Builts
Mountain View, CA
&RHIVWSR5EGMǰG*RKMRIIVMRK
Construction Inc.
Arroyo Pump Station,
Santa Mateo, CA
City of San Mateo
Palo Alto Pump Stations,
Palo Alto, CA
City of Palo Alto
42nd Avenue Sanitary Sewer
Pump Station, San Mateo, CA
City of San Mateo
Bell Moon Sanitary Sewer Pump
Station, Half Moon Bay, CA
City of Half Moon Bay
Harbor Drive Sewer
Rehabilitation,
Corte Madera, CA
Schaaf + Wheeler
Colorado Ave. Storm Drain
Improvements, Palo Alto, CA
City of Palo Alto
'VSEH[E]8 IVVEGI.RǰPXVEXMSR
.RDZS[*PMQMREXMSROakland, CA
Schaaf + Wheeler
Arch Road NorCal Logistics
Center, Stockton, CA
CT Realty
Leong Drive Water + Sewer
Improvements,
Mountain View, CA
City of Mountain View
El Camino Sanitary Sewer
Improvements, Santa Clara, CA
City of Santa Clara
Newcastle Drive Discharge
Structure, Stockton, CA
JBS Builders
South Trunk Sanitary Sewer
Relief Line, San Mateo, CA
City of San Mateo
7]ER&QE]EưW]IEVWSJPERHWYVZI]MRKI\TIVMIRGIMRGPYHIWWYVZI]MRKERH QETTMRKWIVZMGIWXLEXLEZIWYTTSVXIHXLITPERRMRKERHGSRWXVYGXMSRSJQER] PEVKIWGEPIHIZIPSTQIRXWMRXLI'E]&VIEERH(IRXVEP:EPPI]&W XLIPIEHMRK 5VMRGMTEPMRGLEVKISJ0;ưWWYVZI]HITEVXQIRXLIFSXLQIRXSVWERHWYTTSVXW E PEVKI XIEQ SJ IRMSV YVZI]SVW 5VSNIGX YVZI]SVW YVZI] 8 IG LRMGMERW YVZI] (SSVHMREXSVW ERH )VEJXIVW -I MW[IPPORS[R JSV TVSZMHMRK WYVZI]MRK ERHQETTMRKI\TIVXMWIJSVVIKMSREPHIZIPSTQIRXWXLVSYKLSYXXLI'E]&VIE &W 0;ưW 5VMRGMTEP YVZI] 7]ER [MPP FI VIWTSRWMFPI JSV EPP WYVZI] WIVZMGIW TVSZMHIHERHSZIVEPPWYTIVZMWMSRERH6&6(SZIVWMKLX
RYAN AMAYA, PLS
Principal Surveyor
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Licenses + Registrations
PLS, California
Years Experience
25 ROD STEWART II, PLS
Senior Associate | Senior Land Surveyor
7SHưW ]IEVW SJ PERH WYVZI]MRK I\TIVMIRGI MRGPYHIW WYTIVZMWMS R SJ GSRWXVYGXMSRWYVZI]MRKFSYRHEV]WYVZI]MRKQETTMRKERHWYFHMZ MWMSR[SVO VIPEXIH XS PERH HIZIPSTQIRX -I LEW QEREKIH SRGEPP WYVZI] XEWO SVHIVW GSQTPIXIHJSVEZEVMIX]SJ'E]&VIETYFPMGEKIRGMIWMRGPYHMRK XLI&PEQIHE (SYRX] >SRI
;EXIV &KIRG] XLI &PEQIHE (SYRX] 5YFPMG ;SVOW &KIRG] ERH XLI GMXMIW SJ ER 1IERHVS &PEQIHE )YFPMR ERH 5PIEWERXSR -I [MPP FI VIWTSRWMFPI JSV SZIVWIIMRK XLI TVSNIGX ERH IRWYVMRK XLEX ǰIPH WYVZI] STIVEXMSRW EVI WGLIHYPIH ERH GSRHYGXIH MR GSRJSVQERGI [MXL XLITVSNIGX FYHKIXKSEPWERHWGLIHYPI
&WXLIIRMSVYVZI]SV7SH[MPP[SVOGPSWIP][MXL7]ERERH[MPPFIEZEMPEFPIJSV WYVZI]MRKWYTTSVXWIVZMGIWEWRIIHIH
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
San José-Santa Clara Regional
Wastewater Facility Aerial
Topographic Survey,
San Jose, CA
City of San Jose
Zone 7 Subsidence Level Runs,
Pleasanton, CA
Alameda County Zone 7
;EXIV&KIRG]
Alameda Creek Channel Survey,
Fremont, CA
&PEQIHE(SYRX]5YFPMG;SVOW
Patterson Pass Water Treatment
Plant Expansion,
Alameda County, CA
Alameda County Zone 7
;EXIV&KIRG]
Basins 2 + 3, San Mateo Public
Works Department,
San Mateo, CA
City of San Mateo
Owens/Hopyard Road Widening,
Pleasanton, CA
City of Pleasanton
Stanley Blvd. + Bernal Ave.
Pedestrian Improvements,
Pleasanton, CA
City of Pleasanton
Fremont Civic Center Ph. I,
Fremont, CA
City of Fremont
BWC Terminals Phase III,
Stockton, CA
;EVI2EPGSQF
Iron Horse Trail, San Ramon
Creek Repair, Dublin, CA
Alameda County Zone 7
;EXIV&KIRG]
Alamo Creek Repair, Dublin, CA
Alameda County Zone 7
;EXIV&KIRG]
Arroyo Mocho Creek Repair,
Livermore, CA
City of Livermore
2021 Various Creek Repair
Locations, Livermore, CA
City of Livermore
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
WWW.MONTROSE-ENV.COM
Brian Piontek
Principal | Biological Resources Lead
[email protected]
(510) 899-4808
Oakland, CA
Professional Experience
Brian Piontek is an environmental scientist, biologist, and permitting specialist with experience in both physical processes and biological resources. Brian is able to integrate environmental analysis of both physical and biological conditions and to conduct environmental analyses for hydrology, biology, geology, and other CEQA topics. Brian leads the biological services team for Montrose Northern California and has successfully managed and/or completed 100+ environmental technical studies, special statu s species investigations, and environmental compliance surveys. Brian routinely prepares permit applications for USACE, RWQCB, CDFW, and BCDC, and has led ESA consultations for USFWS and NMFS for numerous habitat restoration and water resource management projects.
Education, Licenses, and Certifications
M.S., Environmental Management, University of San Francisco, 2015 B.S., Environmental Science, California State University East Bay, 2011 Relevant Project Experience
North Valley Regional Recycled Water Prog ram, Del Puerto Water District and City of Modesto, Stanislaus County, CA (2014–2018)
This project constructed infrastructure to deli ver recycled water produced by the City of Modesto to agricultural lands and wildlife refuges on the west side of the San Joaquin River.
The constructed pipeline alignment was appr oximately 32,000 feet in length with a construction easement of approximately 377 acres. Brian supported CEQA/NEPA compliance documentation and technical studies, including wetland delineations, nesting bird and raptor surveys (e.g., Swainson’s hawk [protocol level], burrowing owl, and tricolored blackbird), and special-status species surveys. Brian also assisted with regulatory compliance documentation and reporting.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
WWW.MONTROSE-ENV.COM
Bradford Pump Station Improvements Project; City of Redwood City, Redwood City, CA (2022-present)
The City of Redwood City is planning pump st ation improvements at an existing facility that discharges to Redwood Creek. Brian completed a biological resources constraints assessment and assisted the City in attaining permit authorization from the USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW.
Oakland Roadway Stabilization at Four Sites, City of Oakland, Oakland, CA (2022- present)
Brian is Montrose’s project manager overseeing the environmental compliance and permitting for the project and providing technical review for repairs to a series of slope failures and landslides along roads at four locations. Task s include field evaluation to characterize biological, hydrologic, and geomorphic conditio ns at each site; preparing a CEQA notice of exemption; preparing permit applications fo r USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW; and associated hydrology report, site plan, revegetation plan, and project-specific BMPs.
Vallecitos Channel Post-storm Repairs, Alameda County Water District, Alameda, CA (2023–present)
Brian is leading environmental permitting an d compliance for the project to repair storm damaged facilities, including impact mitiga tion planning and special status species considerations.
On-call Biological Services, City of Mo desto Utilities Department, Modesto, CA (2016–2020)
Montrose provided biological support in compli ance with the City of Modesto’s General Plan mitigation measures. Brian was field lead for pre-construction habitat assessments, wildlife surveys, and lead author for technical me mos to support enviro nmental compliance for special-status wildlife.
Infiltration Gallery/Surface Water Supply Project, Stanislaus Regional Water Authority, Stanislaus County, CA (2016–present)
The project redirects surface water supplies from the Tuolumne River via an existing infiltration gallery, to a water treatment facility, then to the cities through 12.3 miles of water transmission mains. Brian authored EIR analyses for geology and hazards and hazardous materials and assisted with fi eld technical studies to support CEQA evaluations. Brian led environmental compliance reporting and surveys for special-status species.
Colma Creek Sediment and Wetlands Evaluation, San Mateo County Department of Public Works, San Mateo County, CA (2014–2023)
Montrose completed a geomorphic evaluation and biological assessments of the Colma Creek flood control channel and river mouth in a 135 -acre study area. Brian supported wetland delineations, assisted with CEQA IS/MND and permit applications, and assisted the County to renew their regulatory permits to continue conducting routine maintenance activities.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
WWW.MONTROSE-ENV.COM
Debra A. Z. Lilly
Senior Associate II
[email protected]
(916) 447-3479 ext. 15838
Sacramento, CA
Professional Experience
Debra Lilly has more than 25 years of experience managing and leading California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) projects.
Debra has worked with federal, state, region al, and local agencies; special districts; and private developers. Debra has managed prepar ation of a wide range of environmental documents, from addenda and categorical exemptions to quick-turnaround IS/MNDs and complex, statewide EIRs involving close co ordination among the client, project team, subconsultants, and agencies. Debra is also experienced in preparing cumulative impact analyses and alternatives analyses for EIRs. As a project and task manager, Debra maintains careful control of schedule, budget, subconsul tants, and client communications to ensure project success. Debra has taught in-house courses in CEQA and technical writing/editing for environmental professionals.
Education, Licenses, and Certifications
B.A., English, Kenyon College, 1981
Memberships and Professional Affiliations: Association of Environmental Professionals, Superior California Chapter (2002–present)
Relevant Project Experience
State Streets Infrastructure Project IS/MND, City of West Sacramento, West Sacramento, CA (2019–2021)
Under an on-call environmental services contract, Debra managed preparation of an IS/MND for extensive water and sewer line replacement an d rehabilitation in a historic residential neighborhood. Key issues were archaeological, architectural, and tribal cultural resources, biological resources, including tree removal an d HCP compliance, and construction noise.
Debra also managed mitigation monitoring and compliance activities.
Water Master Plan Update EIR and Wastewat er Master Plan Update EIR, City of Modesto, Modesto, CA (2016–2020)
Debra assisted with coordination, editorial review, and quality control for the Draft EIRs and preparation of the Final EIRs.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
WWW.MONTROSE-ENV.COM
CDFA North Valley Laboratory Replacemen t Project, California Department of General Services, Turlock, CA (2020–present)
Debra is deputy project manager for preparation of an EIR and subsequent CEQA documents, mitigation development, and construction mo nitoring for CDFA’s North Valley Laboratory replacement. Key issues in the EIR included potential for land use conflicts with adjacent residential uses, conversion of Prime Farmland and appropriate agricultural mitigation, and potential health risks from operation of necropsy labs and a cremator at the facility.
Purified Water Project EIR, Santa Clara Va lley Water District, Santa Clara County, CA (2021–present)
Valley Water proposes to con struct a new advanced water purification facility (AWPF), pipelines, and associated faciliti es as part of the Purified Water Program in Santa Clara County. Horizon, under contract to ESA, prep ared various technical memoranda and EIR chapters. Before taking on project management responsibilities, Debra provided technical editing services for Horizon’s submittals, ensu ring that they conformed to the established style guidelines, structure, and terminology. In addition, Debra prepared the Wildfire and Recreation chapters of the EIR.
Infiltration Gallery Testing Project IS/MND , Stanislaus Regional Water Authority, Stanislaus County, CA (2016–2020)
Debra managed preparation of an IS/MND for the Stanislaus Regional Water Authority (SRWA) to evaluate the impacts of testing water qual ity and production capacity at an existing infiltration gallery on the south bank of the Tuolumne River near Hughson, CA. Testing of the infiltration gallery was needed to determine whether it could be used to supply a proposed new water treatment plant as part of the Su rface Water Supply Project. The IS/MND was certified in September 2017. Permits were obta ined and construction of the wet well was completed in winter 2020. Debra managed permitting, environmental compliance, and construction monitoring activities.
Del Rio Tank and Wells Project EIR, City of Modesto, Modesto, CA (2016–2017) Debra managed preparation of the City of Modesto’s Del Rio Tank and Wells Project EIR. This project was evaluated at a program level in the Water System Engineer’s Report Program EIR, which Horizon prepared in 2010. The EIR evaluated potential impacts of constructing and operating water wells, a storage tank, and associated distribution facilities. Completion of the EIR cleared the way for the City to address water pressure and fire flow insufficiencies for the Del Rio community.
California Highway Patrol Area Office Replacement Projects, California Department of General Services (2015-present)
Debra prepared the land use, utilities, and recreation sections for the EIRs and IS/MNDs. She provided editing and public coordination.
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
“Protecting the infrastructure through innovative
Corrosion Engineering Solutions”
SUMMARY
Over thirty-seven (37) years of experience in all phases of corrosion projects including design engineering, manufacturing, research and development, construction inspection services, construction management, sales and marketing and litigation expert witness. Have successfully worked with clients in the fields of aerospace, marine, petroleum, chemical, mining and minerals, water and wastewater treatment and transmission, electric power industry, transportation systems, municipalities and state and federal government agencies. Established a proven track record for the ability to manage and direct complex research and design projects, requiring the coordination of strict budgets and demanding schedules with engineering staff and project teams.
Special areas of expertise include cathodic protection design, installation, monitoring, troubleshooting, surveying, adjusting and repairing for underground pipelines, pile supported structures, seawalls, retaining structures, marine vessels, storage tanks, condenser water boxes, cooling water lines, intake structures, traveling screens and water wells. Additional expertise in the diagnosis of internal and external corrosion problems associated with copper piping systems such as thermogalvanic corrosion, high temperature corrosion, velocity related corrosion and corrosion related to cold water pitting phenomena, failure analysis of building plumbing systems, conducting soil corrosivity studies, expert witness for litigation support.
PUBLICATIONS & SEMINARS
Ź Ali, M. & Howard Jr., J.D. Corrosion Investigation of Steel H-Piles. NACE Corrosion Conference 1990.
Ź California State Water Resources Control Board, Seminars throughout state, “Corrosion and Corrosion Control for Underground Storage Tanks”, 1994-1995.
Ź Cal/Nev Section of AWWA, Fall Conference, 1994-1995, “Corrosion Control for Water Wells”.
Ź San Francisco Bay Area NACE Conference, August, 1996, “Corrosion Concerns of the Water Industry”.
Ź California Water Environment Association, Northern Regional Conference, Sept., 1996, “Metal Selection and Corrosion Control for Water and Soil Environments”.
Ź American Society of Civil Engineers, Bay Area Geotechnical Committee, April 1999, “Guidelines for Soil Corrosivity Testing and Laboratory Analysis”.
Ź East Bay Engineers Society, Fairfield, CA, Spring 2004 “What All Civil Engineers Should Know About Corrosion and Corrosion Control”.
Ź NACE Western Area Conference, Oct. 2008 “How to Conduct an Evaluation of Asbestos-Cement Pipe”.
Ź NACE Western Area Conference, Oct. 2008 “Case Study of Prestressed Precast Concrete Pile Failures”.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science –
Civil/Structural Engineering,
University of Florida
MBA Courses (2 years) -
Northern Illinois University
REGISTRATIONS
Ź Registered Professional Civil Engineer, CA
(C44435)
Ź Registered Professional Corrosion
Engineer, CA (CR1055)
Ź Registered Professional Civil Engineer, NV
(019295)
Ź Registered Professional Engineer, IL
(inactive)
EXPERIENCE
President/Owner
JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc.
Concord, CA
1995 – Present
District Manager
Corrpro Companies
Hayward, CA
1992 – 1995
President
Corrosion Engineering & Research Co.
Concord, CA
1987 – 1992
Design/Project Engineer
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
Oakbrook, IL & San Francisco, CA
1977 – 1985
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
Hourly Charge Rate Schedule
Personnel Charges
Charges for personnel engaged in professional and/or technical work are based on the actual hours directly chargeable to the project.
Current rates by classification are listed below:
Classification Rate/Hr
Principal Project Manager $295
Senior Project Manager $270
Senior Engineer $250
Associate Engineer $220
Assistant Engineer $200
Junior Engineer $185
Designer $175
GIS Analyst $175
Technician $160
Engineering Trainee $135
Litigation Charges
Court or deposition time as an expert witness is charged at $500 per hour.
Materials and Services
Subcontractors, special equipment, outside reproduction, data processing, computer services, etc., will be charged at 1.10 times cost.
Effective 1/1/24
Schaaf & Wheeler
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
4699 Old Ironsides Dr., Suite 350
Santa Clara, CA 95054-1860
408-246-4848
Attachment 2
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1
ID
Task
Mode
Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Notice To Proceed 0 days Mon 7/15/24 Mon 7/15/24
2 Project Management 485 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 5/22/26
3 Project Management & Coordination 485 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 5/22/26 4 Draft Basis of Design 40 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 9/6/24
5 Surveying 50 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 9/20/24
6 Geotechnical Investigation 50 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 9/20/24 7 City Review of Draft BOD 10 days Mon 9/9/24 Fri 9/20/24 8 Final Basis of Design 10 days Mon 9/23/24 Fri 10/4/24 9 Permitting 160 days Mon 10/7/24 Fri 5/16/25
10 Detailed Design 115 days Mon 10/7/24 Fri 3/14/25
11 60% Plans, Specifications, Estimates 40 days Mon 10/7/24 Fri 11/29/24 12 City Review of 60% Deliverables 10 days Mon 12/2/24 Fri 12/13/24 13 90% Plans, Specifications, Estimates 30 days Mon 12/2/24 Fri 1/10/25 14 City Review of 90% Deliverables 10 days Mon 1/13/25 Fri 1/24/25 15 100% Plans, Specifications, Estimates 20 days Mon 1/20/25 Fri 2/14/25 16 City Review of 100% Deliverables 10 days Mon 2/17/25 Fri 2/28/25 17 Final Plans, Specifications, Estimates 10 days Mon 3/3/25 Fri 3/14/25 18 Bidding and ESDC 310 days Mon 3/17/25 Fri 5/22/26
19 Project Bid & Award 50 days Mon 3/17/25 Fri 5/23/25
20 Project Construction 260 days Mon 5/26/25 Fri 5/22/26 7/15
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Qtr 3, 2024 Qtr 4, 2024 Qtr 1, 2025 Qtr 2, 2025 Qtr 3, 2025 Qtr 4, 2025 Qtr 1, 2026 Qtr 2, 2026 Lincoln St. Sanitary Sewr Pump Station
Wed 4/10/24
City of Stockton
Attachment 3
EXHIBIT 1
Attachment 1