Agenda packet — City Council and Concurrent Authorities, July 15, 2025 (part 8 of 8)

I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -►- - - -►- - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
.... I .... I .... . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . ...

EXHIBIT
1 1635

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 2.6620 1.6677 19.4699 0.0571 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 5,691.935 4 5,691.935
4 0.1602 5,695.940
8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 4 9,481.010
4 0.3984 9,490.969
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
238 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~----~----1-----1
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - -1-----t
-
........ .,4 ...... .,4 ......

I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -► - - - -►- - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
.... I .... I .... . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . ...

EXHIBIT
1 1636

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 2.6620 1.6677 19.4699 0.0571 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 5,691.935 4 5,691.935
4 0.1602 5,695.940
8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 4 9,481.010
4 0.3984 9,490.969
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
239 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~----~----1-----1
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - -1-----t
-
........ .,4 ...... .,4 ......

I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -► - - - -►- - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
.... I .... I .... . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . ...

EXHIBIT
1 1637

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 4 5,483.797
4 0.1442 5,487.402
0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 1.9356 9,155.198 1 9,155.198
1 0.3538 9,164.043
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
240 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~----~----1-----1
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----t
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - -1-----t
-
........ .,4 ...... .,4 ......

I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - -► - - - -►- - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - -r - - - -r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- I I
- - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
.... I .... I .... . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . ...

EXHIBIT
1 1638

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 4 5,483.797
4 0.1442 5,487.402
0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 1.9356 9,155.198 1 9,155.198
1 0.3538 9,164.043
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
241 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~ ----~ ----
- ----~---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - .... I .... I ....
- ----'----
' ' '
........ .,4 ...... .,4 ...... •·44 .. .,•.44 ..

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - -► - - - -►- - - -
- ----►---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ····r···· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .... I .... I .... ----'---- .............. . ........

EXHIBIT
1 1639

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 003 102.7603 Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 003 102.7603 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
242 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~ ----~ ----
- ----~---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - .... I .... I ....
- ----'----
' ' '
........ .,4 ...... .,4 ...... •·44 .. .,•.44 ..

EXHIBIT
1 1640

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 003 102.7603 Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 003 102.7603 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
243 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~ ----~ ----
- ----~---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - .... I .... I ....
- ----'----
' ' '
4 ...... .,4 ...... .,4 ...... ..444 .... 444

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - -►- - - -►- - - -
- ----►---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ····r···· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .... I .... I .... ----'---- .............. . ........

EXHIBIT
1 1641

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 003 99.5663 Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 003 99.5663 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
244 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~ ----~ ----
- ----~---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - .... I .... I ....
- ----'----
' ' '
........ .,4 ...... .,4 ...... •·44 .. .,•.44 ..

EXHIBIT
1 1642

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 003 99.5663 Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 003 99.5663 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
245 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~ ----~ ----
- ----~---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - .... I .... I ....
- ----'----
' ' '
4 ...... .,4 ...... .,4 ...... ..444 .... 444

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - -►- - - -►- - - -
- ----►---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ····r···· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .... I .... I .... ----'---- .............. . ........

EXHIBIT
1 1643

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e003 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 003 0.3315 1,061.381 8 1,061.381 8 0.0264 1,062.041 0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e003 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 003 0.3315 1,061.381 8 1,061.381 8 0.0264 1,062.041 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
246 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~ ----~ ----
- ----~---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I
- I - - - -r - - - -r - - - - ----r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - .... I .... I ....
- ----'----
' ' '
........ .,4 ...... .,4 ...... •·44 .. .,•.44 ..

EXHIBIT
1 1644

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e003 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 003 0.3315 1,061.381 8 1,061.381 8 0.0264 1,062.041 0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e003 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 003 0.3315 1,061.381 8 1,061.381 8 0.0264 1,062.041 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
247 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - -1-----1
----.. ---~4444.4444.4444, .. --....

I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----►----►-------
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
- ----~----~--------~
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
----~----~--------~
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
- ----~----~----1-----1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
____ I ____ I ___ _
..............

EXHIBIT
1 1645
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
248 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
:: I I I I I I I I I t I I I
•• I
e1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - -~-------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------· - - - - - - -~-------.--------.--------,--------r - - - - - - - ., ., ., .,
I I
I I •
····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------~-------------------------- • I I •
····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------~-------------------------- • I I •
····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------~-------------------------- • I I •
····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------~-------------------------- • ' I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-····--···•4----····--····--····--··~--------------------------• ' I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-·---------4------------------------~-------------------------- . • ' I •
I I

EXHIBIT
1 1646
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
R t t)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

5.0 Energy Detail5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
249 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM

I I I I I I
~ ................... .
~ ...................... .
' i--...
~
-•••t••t••t••t••t••~··
--•--•--•--•--•--•--
' ' ' ' '

I I I I I

I I I I I
' ' ' ' ' I I I I I

I I I I I

I I I I I
,__ --~--~--~--~--~--•-- • I I I I

I I I I I

I I I I I
1 1--... -•••!••!••!••!••!••!•• . . . . . .
--
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
--- .. .

I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--- ~--+--+.
- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
.. ~ .. ~ .. , ... ~---~---~··· ' ' ' ' ' '
........................... ' ' ' ' ' '

EXHIBIT
1 1647
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
250 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
----- - - - ·t - - - -
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
•••• L ••••
'
----.. ---•~~44·····
I
--------- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
•••• L •••• . . . .. . . . .

EXHIBIT
1 1648

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e004 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 003 2.4100e- 003 132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e004 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 003 2.7700e- 003 151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e003 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e003 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 29.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
251 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ----

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I .... I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' '
....................................................................

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- - - - -►- - - -►- - - -►- - - -►- - - -►- - - -►- - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - - I I I

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I .... 4444.4444.4444.4444.4444.4444.4444

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
... . L .... L .... L .... L .... L .... L ....
' ' ' ' ' '

EXHIBIT
1 1649

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e004 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 003 2.4100e- 003 132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise

35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building

1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e004 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 003 2.7700e- 003 151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e003 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant

5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center

0.251616 2.7100e003 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 29.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
252 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
' ' ' ' ' '
- ----~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ----~ ----

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I .... I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' '
....................................................................

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- - - - -►- - - -►- - - -►- - - -►- - - -►- - - -►- - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
- I I I I I I - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - ·r - - - -

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I ... _I .... 4444.4444.4444.4444.4444.4444.4444

I I I I I I

I I I I I I
... . L .... L .... L .... L .... L .... L ....
' ' ' ' ' '

EXHIBIT
1 1650
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e003 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
253 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
-----
--- ·t - - - -
I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
•••• L ••••
'
----.. ---•----····· I --------- I
I
I
I
I
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
----~----
I
I
I
I
'
I
•••• L •••• . . . .. . . . .
--------------
' ' '
----~ ----~ ----~ ----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - -r- - - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - -r- - - -r- - - -r- - - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r • - - ·r • - - ·r • - - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
.... I .... I .... I ....
' ' '
----·----·----·---- I I I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
----~ ----~ ----~ ----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r-- - ·r-- - ·r-- - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r • - - ·r • - - ·r • - - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r-- - ·r-- - ·r-- - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r-- - ·r-- - ·r-- - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r-- - ·r-- - ·r-- - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r-- - ·r-- - ·r-- - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r-- - ·r-- - ·r-- - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- - - ·r-- - ·r-- - ·r-- - -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
.... I .... I .... I .... . .................. ' ' '

EXHIBIT
1 1651

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water7.0 Water Detail8.0 Waste Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
254 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
' ' '
- ----~ ----~ ----~ ----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- I I I ---·r····r··--r··--
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- ... _I ... _I ... _I .... ' ' '
----··----·----·----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- ----►----►----►----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- I I I ---·r····r··--r··--
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
------ I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
------ I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
- I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
------ I I I ----r----r----r----
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
... _I ... _I ... _I .... . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . ' ' '

EXHIBIT
1 1652

11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter TSAI -1
255 of 277
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM

EXHIBIT
1 1653
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 120.77
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 100.80
% Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
Local Hire Provision Net Change
With Local Hire Provision
Without Local Hire Provision
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ
TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
256 of 277
1 1654

EXHIBIT B
TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
257 of 277
1 1655

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 June 2019
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling operations, oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, and many other industrial and agricultural sources. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at dozens of sites and has testified as an expert witness on more than ten cases involving exposure to air contaminants from industrial sources.

TSAI -1
258 of 277
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
EXHIBIT 1
1656
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 June 2019
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
259 of 277
1 1657
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 June 2019
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
260 of 277
1 1658
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 June 2019
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
261 of 277
1 1659
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 June 2019
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
262 of 277
1 1660
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 June 2019
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
263 of 277
1 1661
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 June 2019
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
264 of 277
1 1662
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 June 2019
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case: No 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
265 of 277
1 1663
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 June 2019
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants.

Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014
TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
266 of 277
1 1664
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 June 2019
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant.

Case 3:10-cv-00622
Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013
In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland
Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013
TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
267 of 277
1 1665

EXHIBIT C
TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
268 of 277
1 1666
1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887-9013
Email: [email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.

Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.

Positions Matt has held include:
x Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); x Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2Ŗŗ4; x Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); TSAI -1
269 of 277
JswAPE ! TechnicafConsuttatloh, DataAnalys~ and , • 1 Ullga.tion Support for tho Environment EXHIBIT 1
1667
x Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); x Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
x Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); x Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
x Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); x Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
x Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
x Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
x Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. x Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
x Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. x Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. x Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. x Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
x Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
x Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. x Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. x Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
x Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. x Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
x Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
x Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. x Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
270 of 277
1 1668
x Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi. x Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 3 TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
271 of 277
1 1669
x Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
x Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
x Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
x Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
x Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
x Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
4 TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
272 of 277
1 1670
x Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
x Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
x Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. x Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
x Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
x Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. x Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
x Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. x Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
x Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
x Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nationwide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. x Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
x Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
x Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
x Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. x Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy-making process.
x Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
273 of 277
1 1671
Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
x Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
x Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
x Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
x Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. x Conducted aquifer tests.
x Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
x At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
x Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. x Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
6 TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
274 of 277
1 1672
Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
7 TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
275 of 277
1 1673
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te ri zati o n and Cl ean up at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPLcontaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
276 of 277
1 1674
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011.
9 TSAI -1

EXHIBIT
277 of 277
1 1675

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
EXHIBIT 1
1676
City of Stockton—South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Responses to Written Comments FirstCarbon Solutions 1-393 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5576/55760004/ISMND/Final ISMND/55760004 Sec01-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx Tsai (TSAI-1)
Response to TSAI-1-1
The commenter provides introductory remarks. No response is required.

Response to TSAI-1-2
The commenter summarizes project details. No response is required.

Response to TSAI-1-3
The commenters describes their membership. No response is required.

Response to TSAI-1-4
The commenter provides introductory remarks. No response is required.

Response toTSAI-1-5
The commenter incorporates other comments submitted on the Draft IS/MND. No response is required.

Response to TSAI-1-6
The commenter requests notice for any upcoming hearing. The comment is noted. No further response is required.

Response to TSAI-1-7
The commenter requests that a local workforce be used to construct the proposed project. This comment is beyond the purview of CEQA, although the document acknowledges that the proposed project would provide employment opportunities for local residents and that the unemployment rate in the Stockton-Lodi Metropolitan Area would provide a substantial number of available workers for hire.

Response to TSAI-1-8
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-7.

Response to TSAI-1-9
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-7.

Response toTSAI-1-10
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-7.

Response to TSAI-1-11
Refer to response to TSAI-1-7.

Response to TSAI-1-12
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-7.

Response to TSAI-1-13
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-7.

EXHIBIT 1
1677
Responses to Written Comments City of Stockton—South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project 1-394 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5576/55760004/ISMND/Final ISMND/55760004 Sec01-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx Response to TSAI-1-14
The Draft IS/MND confirms that the proposed project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts; accordingly, preparation of an EIR including analysis of project alternatives is not warranted under CEQA.

Response toTSAI-1-15
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-14.

Response to TSAI-1-16
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-14.

Response to TSAI-1-17
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-14.

Response to TSAI-1-18
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-14.

Response to TSAI-1-19
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-14.

Response toTSAI-1-20
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-14.

Response to TSAI-1-21
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-14.

Response to TSAI-1-22
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-14.

Response to TSAI-1-23
The commenters asserts that the proposed project would have a cumulatively significant air quality impact on disadvantaged communities located within the project vicinity. The Draft IS/MND demonstrates that the proposed project would not have any significant impacts. See Response to BLUM-1-7 related to project impacts to nearby disadvantaged communities.

Response to TSAI-1-24
The commenter provides background information on SB 535, identification of disadvantaged communities. The commenter states that the proposed project is near disadvantaged communities.

The comment does not raise any specific environmental issue in the Draft IS/MND. No response is needed.

Response toTSAI-1-25
The commenter states that the City should ensure that the proposed project would not have an adverse impact on nearby disadvantaged communities. The proposed project’s impact on nearby sensitive receptors, which are disadvantaged communities, is appropriately analyzed and disclosed in the Draft IS/MND. See Response to BLUM-1-8.

EXHIBIT 1
1678
City of Stockton—South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Responses to Written Comments FirstCarbon Solutions 1-395 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5576/55760004/ISMND/Final ISMND/55760004 Sec01-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx Response to TSAI-1-26
SB 1000 directs cities and counties to incorporate environmental justice into the General Plan update process when two or more elements are being updated. SB 1000 does not apply to the preparation of an IS/MND when the current General Plan does not contain an Environmental Justice Element and no policies have been adopted to direct the analysis of potential impacts.

Of relevance here, neither the ARB nor the Valley Air District has recommended significance thresholds be adjusted for environmental justice considerations, and thus neither entity recommends the evaluation of the same as part of the CEQA process. The conclusions of the MND confirm that the proposed project would not result in any significant unavoidable impacts to any local community or the public at large.

Response to TSAI-1-27
The commenter asserts that the City should prepare an HRA that includes all potential operational health risks from project-related diesel particulate matter (diesel PM) emission sources, including, but not limited to, backup generators, on-site diesel-powered equipment, locomotives, and heavyduty trucks. The proposed project’s operation health risk impacts are appropriately analyzed and disclosed in the Draft IS/MND. See Response to BLUM-1-82 through BLUM-1-86. No further analysis is needed.

Response to TSAI-1-28
The commenter states that the HRA should evaluate whether the proposed project’s operation, considered together with past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would cause a cumulative cancer risk impact on neighboring communities, and therefore include all air pollution reduction measures listed in Attachment A of the ARB letter.

As stated, the proposed project’s operational health risk impacts are appropriately analyzed and disclosed in the Draft IS/MND. See Response to BLUM1-82 through BLUM-1-86. No further analysis or response is needed.

Response to TSAI-1-29
The commenter states that “if the project will be used for cold storage, the City should model air pollutant emissions from on-site TRUs.”
The proposed project does not include cold storage. MM GHG-1e expressly limits the project use to dry storage only. As previously stated, the proposed project’s health risk impacts are appropriately analyzed and disclosed in the Draft IS/MND within the HRA, which was conducted according to the latest OEHHA guidance and takes into account the proposed project’s attributes. See Response to BLUM-1-82 through BLUM-1-86. No further analysis or response is needed.

Response to TSAI-1-30
The commenter states that if TRUs will not be utilized then the City should ensure that any future use of TRUs will be prevented by use of restrictive covenant as a part of the conditions of approval.

As previously stated, the proposed project’s health risk impacts are appropriately analyzed and disclosed in the Draft IS/MND within the HRA, which was conducted according to the latest OEHHA guidance and includes the use of the HARP2 model. See Response to BLUM-1-82 through BLUM-1- 86, and Response to TSAI-1-29. No further analysis or response is needed.

EXHIBIT 1
1679
Responses to Written Comments City of Stockton—South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project 1-396 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5576/55760004/ISMND/Final ISMND/55760004 Sec01-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx Response to TSAI-1-31
The commenter asserts that the proposed project’s HRA should also include health risks associated with construction diesel particulate matter emissions and should follow OEHHA guidance and utilize the HARP2 model when calculating potential health risks. As demonstrated in Section 2.3, Air Quality, Impact c) (page 44 to 49) of the Draft IS/MND, the proposed project’s construction health risk impacts to nearby sensitive receptors were appropriately analyzed and disclosed. The proposed project’s construction health risk impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, no further analysis or response is needed.

Response to TSAI-1-32
The commenter states that the City must address, study and mitigate the proposed project’s reasonably foreseeable air quality impacts, including the localized air pollutant exposure at the neighborhood level, as well as the proposed project’s regional air quality impacts, through a revised HRA.

As previously stated, the Draft IS/MND properly addressed and studied the proposed project’s reasonably foreseeable air quality impacts according to guidance and recommendations set forth by the Valley Air District, including for localized air pollutant exposures at the neighborhood level. The analysis in the Draft IS/MND includes an HRA which was conducted pursuant to the most current OEHHA guidance. No further response or analysis is needed.

Response to TSAI-1-33
The commenter summarizes CEQA requirements and case laws related to mitigation measures and deferral of mitigation. This comment does not raise any project-specific environmental issues, no response is needed.

Response to TSAI-1-34
The commenter asserts that MM AQ-4b is deferred mitigation because it lacks necessary enforcement mechanisms to ensure the assessment is performed and available to the public prior to project approval. The City disagrees. General Plan MM AQ-4b requires the applicant to comply with Valley Air District Rule 9510 which requires air impact assessment and fee payment (if necessary) based on Valley Air District Indirect Source Review thresholds. These thresholds are distinct from the air emission thresholds set forth by the Valley Air District for the purpose of CEQA analysis. The proposed project’s emissions are appropriately compared to the Valley Air District CEQA thresholds as shown in Section 2.3 Air Quality of the Draft IS/MND. The proposed project would not exceed any emission thresholds as shown in Tables 1 through 5 in the Draft IS/MND. Therefore, although General Plan MM AQ-4b (compliance with Valley Air District Rule 9510) is applicable to the proposed project because it applies to all development projects subject to CEQA, it is not needed to reduce an air quality impact. See Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland (2011) 195 CA4th 884, 906 (“a condition requiring compliance with regulations is a common and reasonable mitigation measure and may be proper where it is reasonable to expect compliance.”) Furthermore, in accordance with MM AQ-4b, the applicant has assessed the proposed project and submitted the Indirect Source Review application package to the Valley Air District in accordance with Rule 9510. On December 20, 2024, the Valley Air District approved the application package and EXHIBIT 1
1680
City of Stockton—South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Responses to Written Comments FirstCarbon Solutions 1-397 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5576/55760004/ISMND/Final ISMND/55760004 Sec01-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx deemed that no additional fees or mitigation is needed. Thus, the requirements in MM AQ-4b have been met.

No further analysis is necessary.

Response to TSAI-1-35
The commenter states that “As the currently air quality mitigations are speculative in nature, there is a fair argument that there will be a significant air quality impact requiring the preparation of an EIR.” As demonstrated above, the proposed project’s environmental impacts have been appropriately analyzed and disclosed. The proposed project would not result in any significant impact that would not be reduced by implementation of mitigation measures. Therefore, no additional analysis or preparation of EIR is necessary.

Response to TSAI-1-36
Section 2.4, Biological Resources, of the Draft IS/MND includes a comprehensive analysis of potential impacts and also identifies MM BIO 1 through MM BIO-6 to ensure that impacts are avoided or minimized to the greatest extent possible
Response to TSAI-1-37
Refer to Response to TSA- 1-36.

Response to TSAI-1-38
As stated in Section 2.4 Biological Resources, of the Draft IS/MND, the SJCOG offers compensatory mitigation for loss of Valley Oak Woodland and Forest through the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) permitting process. Potential impacts to valley oak woodland are typically addressed through the payment of fees or purchase of banking credits prior to or at the time of issuance of building permits. Per communication with the SJCOG in April 2022, no permanent setback is required to avoid impacts on the riparian corridor. The proposed project would implement all water quality protection measures imposed by the SJCOG and the RWQCB, and therefore any potential indirect impacts on aquatic special-status species would be reduced to less than significant.

Response to TSAI-1-39
Refer to Response to TSAI-1-36 and TSAI-1-38.

Response to TSAI-1-40
The comment in opposition to the proposed project is noted and will be forwarded to the decisionmakers for their consideration.

EXHIBIT 1
1681

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
EXHIBIT 1
1682
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
EXHIBIT 1
1683
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
for the
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Stockton, San Joaquin County, California
Prepared for:

City of Stockton
345 North El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
202.937.8561
Contact: Nicole D. Moore, LEED® AP
Prepared by:

FirstCarbon Solutions
2999 Oak Road, Suite 250
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.357.2562
Contact: Mary Bean, Project Director
Elizabeth Johnson, Senior Project Manager
Report Date: October 24, 2024
EXHIBIT 1
1684
EXHIBIT 1
1685
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Preface
FirstCarbon Solutions 1 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx

PREFACE
Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 require a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) whenever it adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in conjunction with a project approval.

The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.

The Draft IS/MND prepared for the proposed South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project (proposed project) concluded that project implementation could result in potentially significant effects on the environment and mitigation measures were incorporated into the proposed project or are required as a condition of project approval that reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. This MMRP documents how and when the mitigation measures adopted by the Lead Agency will be implemented and confirms that potential environmental impacts are reduced to less than significant levels as identified in the Draft IS/MND.

This document does not discuss those subjects that the environmental analysis demonstrates would result in less than significant impacts and for which no mitigation was proposed or necessary.

EXHIBIT 1
1686
EXHIBIT 1
1687
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 3 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Table 1: South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial

2.3 Air Quality
MM AQ-4b: Prior to discretionary approval, applicants for development projects that are subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) shall assess their projects to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s (SJVAPCD) Rule 9510 Applicability Thresholds as follows:
• 50 residential units;
• 2,000 square feet of commercial space;
• 25,000 square feet of light industrial space;
• 100,000 square feet of heavy industrial space;
• 20,000 square feet of medical office space;
• 39,000 square feet of general office space;
• 9,000 square feet of education space;
• 10,000 square feet of government space;
• 20,000 square feet of recreational space; or
• 9,000 square feet of space not identified above.

Applicants for development projects subject to CEQA that do not meet the SJVAPCD Rule 9510 Applicability Thresholds shall assess whether project-related construction and
operational emissions exceed the SJVAPCD 100 pounds per day ambient air quality screening threshold. Applicants for development projects that exceed this ambient air quality screening threshold shall prepare or have prepared an
ambient air quality analysis, consistent with the SJVAPCD Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI), to assess whether the subject development
project would cause or contribute to a violation of any California Ambient Air Quality Standard or National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The ambient air quality analysis shall identify measures to reduce impacts, as necessary.

Incorporation of air
quality analysis
recommendations into
all construction
management and design
plans; submission to
City.

Prior to
discretionary
approval.

City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1688
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 4 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
Recommended measures may include those identified in MM AQ-2 and MM AQ-3. The related recommendations of the
ambient air quality analysis shall be incorporated into all construction management and design plans and shall be
submitted to the City and verified by the City’s Planning and Engineering Division.

2.4 Biological Resources
MM BIO-1: Prior to any disturbance activities (including vegetation removal and grading), the applicant shall obtain a San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) permit from San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) to mitigate for impacts to SJMSCPcovered species and their habitats. The applicant shall implement all requirements and conditions stated in the SJMSCP permit. Coverage involves compensation for habitat impacts on covered species through implementation of
Incidental Take Minimization Measures (ITMMs) and payment of fees for conversion of lands that may provide habitat for covered species.

Provide proof of
implementation of all
requirements and
conditions.

Prior to any
disturbance
activities.

City of Stockton.

MM BIO-2a: Avoidance and Minimization of Indirect
Temporary Impacts to Water Quality and Riparian Habitat • The project applicant shall obtain a Construction General Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB). The applicant shall ensure that the project Civil Engineer prepares all required stormwater planning
documents consistent with the requirements of the
RWQCB (e.g., a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
[SWPPP] that complies with current National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System [NPDES]; Best Management
Practices [BMPs] to control the pollutants in stormwater runoff, and/or a Storm Water Management Plan [SWMP])
shall be developed and integrated into the project plan.

Review construction
plans.

During construction
activities.

City of Stockton
EXHIBIT 1
1689
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 5 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
MM BIO-2b: No Work Within the Riparian Corridor and
Creek Bed or Banks
• No work (including vegetation removal) shall take place within the riparian corridor of French Camp Slough unless specifically permitted by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB).
• Prior to construction the applicant shall install silt fencing including the placement of straw wattles between all
construction areas and the riparian corridor to avoid
impacts to water quality by grading and construction. A qualified Biologist shall be on-site to monitor the
installation of fencing. Fencing shall be in place and
regularly maintained during project implementation.

Review construction
plans.

During construction
activities.

City of Stockton.

MM BIO-2c: Avoidance and Minimization of Indirect
Permanent Impacts to Water Quality and Riparian Habitat • The applicant shall install post-construction stormwater management measures and establish a long-term
maintenance plan. This requirement is intended to ensure that the post-construction conditions at the project site do not cause or contribute to direct or indirect water quality impacts (i.e., pollution and/or hydromodification)
upstream and downstream. Specifically, the discharger
shall demonstrate compliance with the post-construction standards set forth in the General Permit. The discharger is responsible for all compliance issues including all annual fees until the Notice of Termination (NOT) has been filed and approved by the local Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).
• The applicant shall establish permanent fencing to keep trash and other debris from moving off-site into the
aquatic or riparian habitats of French Camp Slough.

Review construction
plans.

During construction
activities.

City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1690
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 6 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
MM BIO-3: Protection of Active Bird Nests (includes preconstruction survey and implementation of avoidance buffer, if found).
• Removal of trees shall be limited to only those necessary to construct the proposed project as reflected in the relevant project approval documents.
• If the proposed project requires trees to be removed
during the nesting season, pre-construction surveys shall be conducted no more than 10 days prior to the start of ground or vegetation disturbance (including tree removal) to determine whether or not active nests are present.
• If an active nest is located during pre-construction surveys, a qualified Biologist shall determine an appropriately sized avoidance buffer based on the species and anticipated
disturbance level. (The California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW] recommends a minimum no-disturbance
buffer of 250 feet around active nests of non-listed bird species and a 500-foot no-disturbance buffer around active nests of non-listed raptors.) A qualified Biologist shall delineate the avoidance buffer using Environmentally
Sensitive Area fencing, pin flags, and/or yellow caution tape. The buffer zone shall be maintained around the
active nest site(s) until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. No construction activities or
construction foot traffic is allowed to occur within the avoidance buffer(s).
• The qualified Biologist shall monitor the active nest during construction activities to prevent any potential impacts that may result from the construction of the proposed
project, until the young have fledged.

Conduct preconstruction surveys; if
active nest is located,
implement appropriate
buffer; retain qualified
biologist.

During construction
activities.

City of Stockton.

MM BIO-4: Roosting Bat Pre-construction Survey and
Avoidance
Prior to the start of construction (e.g., prior to any
earthmoving or ground-disturbing activity), a qualified Conduct preconstruction surveys; if
roosting bats are
located, implement
Prior to the start of
construction, no
more than 14 days
City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1691
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 7 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
Biologist with relevant roosting bat experience shall conduct a survey for special-status bats during the appropriate time of day to maximize detectability to determine whether bat
species are roosting near the work area no less than 7 days and no more than 14 days prior to beginning ground
disturbance and/or construction. Survey methodology may include visual surveys of bats (e.g., observation of bats during foraging period), inspection for suitable habitat, bat sign (e.g., guano), or use of ultrasonic detectors (Anabat, etc.).

Visual surveys will include trees within 500 feet of project construction activities. Not more than 2 weeks prior to building demolition, the project applicant shall ensure that a qualified Biologist (i.e., one familiar with the identification of bats and signs of bats) survey buildings proposed for
demolition for the presence of roosting bats or evidence of bats. If no roosting bats or evidence of bats are found in the structure, demolition may proceed. If the Biologist
determines or presumes bats are present, the Biologist shall exclude the bats from suitable spaces by installing one-way exclusion devices. After the bats vacate the space, the Biologist shall close off the space to prevent recolonization.

Building demolition shall only commence after the Biologist verifies 7 to 10 days later that the exclusion methods have successfully prevented bats from returning. To avoid impacts on young non-volant (i.e., non-flying) bats, the Biologist shall only conduct bat exclusion and eviction from May 1 through October 1. Exclusion efforts may be restricted during periods of sensitive activity (e.g., during hibernation or while females in maternity colonies are nursing young) as determined by the Biologist.
appropriate buffer;
retain qualified biologist.
prior to beginning
ground disturbance.

MM BIO-5: The project applicant shall implement GP NCR2.18 Minimize Lighting Impacts for the portion of the project site that is visible from the riparian corridor of French Camp Review construction
plans.

During construction
activities.

City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1692
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 8 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
Slough. The applicant shall ensure that lighting associated with new development or facilities (including street lighting, recreational facilities, and parking) shall be designed to prevent artificial lighting from illuminating adjacent natural areas at a level greater than 1 foot-candle above ambient conditions.

MM BIO-6: The applicant shall prepare and submit a tree report to the City of Stockton. The tree report shall include the location, species, and diameter at 24 inches above grade (for multi-trunked trees the combined total trunk diameter shall be used for all trunks measuring 6 inches or greater measured at 24 inches above actual grade). The tree report shall list the number of ordinance-size trees proposed to be removed. For ordinance-size trees to be removed, the
applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit from the City of Stockton. If ordinance-size valley oaks are proposed to be removed, then mitigation for loss of these valley oaks can be covered through valley oak woodland mitigation as required by the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) and
defined in the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJCMSCP) permit to be obtained by the applicant.

Verify submission of tree
report.

Prior to issuance of
Grading Permit
City of Stockton.

2.5 Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources
MM CUL-1: An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology shall provide full-time archaeological monitoring both on-site and off-site for the new sewer line connection in South McKinley Avenue, for all ground disturbance, including, but not limited to, grubbing, clearing, grading, and trenching into previously undisturbed soils.

It is always possible that ground-disturbing activities during construction may uncover previously unknown, buried
Retain qualified
Archeologist; if cultural
resources are
discovered, adhere to
Archeologist’s
recommendations.

During all ground
disturbance
activities.

City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1693
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 9 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
cultural resources. In the event that buried cultural resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified
Archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified Archaeologist shall make recommendations to the Lead Agency on the
measures that shall be implemented to protect the
discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Potentially
significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites.

Any previously undiscovered resources found during
construction within the project area shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA criteria.

If the resources are determined to be unique historic
resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA
Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the Archaeological Monitor and recommended to the Lead
Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect
these resources. Any archaeological artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be donated to a qualified scientific institution approved by the Lead Agency where they would be afforded long-term preservation to allow future scientific study.

EXHIBIT 1
1694
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 10 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
MM CUL-2: In the event of an accidental discovery or
recognition of any human remains, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 must be followed. For purposes of this
project, once project-related earthmoving begins and if there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:

1. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner is
contacted to determine whether the remains are Native
American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be
Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours,
and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it
believes to be the “most likely descendant” of the
deceased Native American. The Most Likely Descendant
(MLD) may make recommendations to the landowner or
the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as
provided in Public Resources Section 5097.98, or

2. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or his/her authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with
appropriate dignity either in accordance with the
recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a
location not subject to further subsurface disturbance:
• The NAHC is unable to identify a MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being
notified by the commission.
• The descendant identified fails to make a
recommendation.

Retain qualified
Archeologist during all
earthmoving activities;
in the event of the
discovery of human
remains, contact NAHC
and the County Coroner
and halt all excavation
on-site or nearby.

During construction
activities.

City of Stockston,
NAHC.

EXHIBIT 1
1695
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 11 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and the
mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures
acceptable to the landowner.

2.7 Geology and Soils
MM GEO-1: The proposed project shall adhere to the site preparation, grading, foundation support, earthwork, and other recommendations of the Geotechnical Exploration for the project site prepared by ENGEO Incorporated on June 20, 2022.

Verify incorporation of
recommendations in
Geotechnical Exploration
into project plans.

Prior to any ground
disturbance
activities.

City of Stockton.

MM GEO-2: All construction-related earth-disturbing
activities that would impact previously undisturbed
sediments on the project site shall be monitored closely by a qualified Paleontologist to recover any fossil remains
discovered quickly and professionally while not impeding development. Should any significant paleontological
resources (e.g., bones, teeth,) be unearthed, all construction activities shall be diverted at least 15 feet from the find until a professional Paleontologist has assessed it and, if deemed significant, salvaged the fossil(s) in a timely manner. Collected fossils shall be deposited in an appropriate repository, such as the University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP), where they would be properly curated and made available for future research.

Retain qualified
Paleontologist; in the
event of the discovery of
significant
paleontological remains,
divert construction
activities by at least 15
feet.

During any ground
disturbance
activities.

City of Stockton.

2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
MM GHG-1a: All buildings shall be designed to provide
infrastructure to support use of electric-powered forklifts and/or other interior vehicles.

Verify construction
plans.

Prior to start of
construction
activities.

City of Stockton.

MM GHG-1b: Only electric-powered off-road equipment
(e.g., forklifts, indoor material handling equipment, etc.) shall be utilized on-site for daily warehouse and business
Verify construction
plans.

During project
operation.

City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1696
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 12 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
operations. The project developer/facility owner shall
disclose this requirement to all tenants/business entities prior to the signing of any lease agreement. In addition, the limitation to use only electric-powered off-road equipment shall be included in all leasing agreements.

MM GHG-1c: All landscaping equipment used at the facility shall be electric or battery powered. The design of the building should provide for outlets on the outside of buildings or in other accessible areas to facilitate the use of electrically powered landscape equipment.

Verify construction
plans.

During project
operation.

City of Stockton.

MM GHG-1d: All buildings shall be designed to facilitate future retrofit of all current natural gas systems and
appliances to electric replacements.

Verify construction
plans.

Prior to start of
construction
activities.

City of Stockton.

MM GHG-1e: The warehouse use will be limited to dry
storage.

Verify construction
plans.

During project
operation.

City of Stockton.

MM GHG-1f: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Community Development Department, Planning Division shall confirm that the Project is designed to include the following:

The buildings’ electrical room shall be sufficiently sized to hold additional panels that may be needed to supply power for the future installation of electric vehicle (EV) truck charging stations on the site. Conduit should be installed from the electrical room to tractor trailer parking spaces in a logical location(s) on the site determined by the project applicant during construction document plan check, for the purpose of accommodating the future installation of EV truck charging stations at such time this technology becomes commercially available and the buildings are being served by trucks with electric-powered engines.

Verify construction
plans.

Prior to issuance of
a building permit.

City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1697
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 13 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial

2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
MM HAZ-1: Prior to project approval, the project applicant shall contract a qualified firm to complete a Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) at the project site. The Phase II ESA shall further investigate the debris pile on-site through soil sampling. The project applicant shall implement all measures recommended by the Phase II ESA
prior to issuance of grading permits.

Verify completion of a
Phase II ESA and
incorporation of all
recommended
measures; review
construction plans.

Prior to project
approval.

City of Stockton.

2.17 Transportation
MM TRANS-1: Transportation Demand Management
The project shall implement the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies as detailed in the
Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA):

1. Pedestrian Network Improvements.

Provide a safe and accessible pedestrian network that links the project site to other areas. The proposed project would provide design elements that enhance walkability and
connectivity, including low-speed internal roadways. The proposed project will also close the City’s sidewalk gap and provide a connection to the City’s existing sidewalk
network.

2. Electric Vehicle Parking and Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Network
The project will provide NEV parking, charging facilities, striping, and signage.

3. Commuter Trip Reduction Program
The proposed project would implement a Commuter Trip
Reduction (CTR) program. The following strategies would be implemented as part of the program:
a. Implement a Commuter Trip Reduction Program
i. TDM Coordinator:

This person would be responsible for implementing
and managing the proposed project’s TDM plan,
Verify implementation of
all TDM strategies;
review construction
plans.

Prior to start of
construction
activities.

City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1698
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 14 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
ensure all employees are aware of all available
transportation options, and serve as the point of
contact for all employees to answer any TDM-related
questions. The following services would be provided
by the TDM Coordinator:
• Provide information packets to all new employees.
• Set up and maintain an on-site and/or online TDM
board/kiosk with information on non-auto
transportation alternatives and promotional
programs.
• Provide trip planning assistance to employees
considering an alternative mode, including
carpool/vanpool ride-matching and bicycle buddy
matching services.
• The appointed Transportation Coordinator would
provide transportation information packets to all
new residents and employees upon move-in. The
packets would include local and regional bikeway
maps, bicycling resources, local and regional
transit maps, locations of nearest transit stops,
local and regional transit schedules of adjacent
routes, trip planning resources, ridematching/sharing programs, and contact information for the Transportation Coordinator.

The new tenant information packets would also be
made available to employees via the on-site
and/or online TDM board.
ii. TDM Marketing/TDM board
The TDM Coordinator will maintain an on-site TDM
board with information on transportation alternatives.

The information provided should contain information
on:
• Local and regional transit routes
EXHIBIT 1
1699
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 15 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• Ride-matching services and any available
discount/incentive programs
• Trip planning resources in San Joaquin County and
the City of Stockton
• Safety tips for cyclists and pedestrians
To be effective, the coordinator will need to update
the board with up-to-date information, commuter
alerts, and new proposed TDM measures or
incentives. Along with this board, the TDM
Coordinator will also need to continuously
promote TDM measures through marketing.

Marketing can be accomplished through the
following measures:
- Yearly survey of employees on their modes of
transportation to work
- Marketing campaigns/events to encourage
alternative travel modes
- Produce courses/guides that promote the
benefits of alternative transportation
iii. Ride Sharing/Carpooling
TDM Coordinator would set up a ride
sharing/carpooling program that can increase vehicle
occupancy and reduces the number of vehicles driving
the same trip, resulting in decreased TDM. To
encourage carpooling, the proposed project would
provide a designated on-site passenger loading space
and provide an on-site and/or online message board
for coordinating rides.

The coordinator would also provide information on
the Van Go! Rideshare service as part of the TDM
Board and the new employee guide. This service can
be used throughout San Joaquin County and is booked
through an online website or mobile application. Up
to three people in the group can use this service with
EXHIBIT 1
1700
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 16 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
the first 5 miles driven costs $4 per person. Any
additional miles after those first five miles using the service cost $0.50 per person.
iv. Alternative Work Schedule Program
TDM Coordinator would setup an alternative work
schedules program that can help reduce peak-period
commute and accommodate ride sharing. Alternative
work schedules include:
• Flextime: Employees can work within a given time
period rather than a rigid schedule. For example, a
company typically working from 8:00 to 4:30 can
have some employees work from 7:30 to 4:00 and
others from 9:00 to 5:30.
• Compressed Work Week: Employees work longer
but fewer days. They can do a 4/40 schedule (four
10-hour work weeks), or a 9/80 schedule (9-hour
work days and a day off every two weeks).
a. Price Parking Program
A Price Parking Program is meant to charge
employees for parking at the work site instead
of providing free parking. By charging for
parking, employees will be encouraged to find
alternative modes of transportation to work.

The revenue received by the price parking
program would be used to fund parts of the
CTR program.

The parking program would charge daily
parking instead of monthly parking to increase
parking prices and decrease accessibility of
employees paying parking. Employees would
pay through an electronic pay box. Guests and
employees who only drive occasionally would
EXHIBIT 1
1701
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 17 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
pay through the TDM Coordinator at the front
office/counter.
b. Freight Transport Management
A Freight Transport Management Program
would be implemented to mitigate truck
traffic and would be coordinated by a Logistics
Manager. This manager can improve fright
transportation efficiency with the following
measures:
• Improve scheduling and routing to reduce
freight vehicle mileage and empty
backhauls.
• The Logistics Manager can schedule freight
deliveries making sure that they deliver as
much shipment as possible. This will
reduce the number of freight trips with
half hauls or trips with empty backhauls.
• Organize regional delivery systems so
fewer vehicle trips are needed to distribute
goods.
• The Logistics Manager can contact regional
warehouses to allow sharing of resources
and freight consolidation. If two
warehouses within the same area are
delivering similar products, they can
coordinate and share a single truck instead
of using two trucks for the delivery.
• Implement weight distance charges.
• A special impact fee would be charged to
freight based on the number of miles
traveled.
• Change freight delivery times to reduce
congestion.

EXHIBIT 1
1702
City of Stockton
South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 18 C:\Users\FCS\Desktop\55760004 South McKinley Avenue East Industrial Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• The Logistics Manager would schedule
more truck deliveries between the off-peak
hours instead of peak hours.

MM TRANS-2: The proposed project shall only allow trucks to exit and not enter from the southernmost project driveway in order to prevent collisions.

Verify construction
plans.

During project
operation.

City of Stockton.

EXHIBIT 1
1703
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE STOCKTON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE “ZONING MAP,” IN SECTION 16.16.030 OF THE STOCKTON

MUNICIPAL CODE, TO PREZONE AND ZONE PROPERTIES TO INDUSTRIAL, LIMITED (IL) LOCATED AT 6505 SOUTH MCKINLEY AVENUE (APN 193-020-34) (APPLICATION NO. P23-0125)
On November 19, 2023, the applicant, Anil Yadav, applied for all of the required entitlements, including a request to Prezone Assessor’s Parcel Number APN 193-020-34 to Industrial, Limited (IL) Zone, for the purposes of future industrial development, including a warehouse building. The legal parcel is approximately 7.88 acres and is currently located in the unincorporated area of San Joaquin County but in the City’s sphere of influence (the Project); and
On April 10, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the Project application, in compliance with SMC Section 16.88.040, at which point all persons wishing to be heard were provided such opportunity, and the Planning Commission voted 6-0 in support of the Project; and
On May 15, 2025, a public notice for the subject application was published in the local newspaper in accordance with the Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Section

16.88.030; and
At the June 3, 2025, City Council hearing, the public hearing was continued to the July 15, 2025, City Council hearing; and
On July 15, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the Project application, in compliance with SMC Section 16.88.040, at which point all persons wishing to be heard were provided such opportunity; now, therefore,

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION I. FINDINGS AND INTENT
The City Council of the City of Stockton finds, pursuant to SMC Section 16.116.050(B), that:

A. The proposed Prezone action ensures and maintains internal consistency with the general land uses, objectives, policies, programs, and actions of all elements of the General Plan on balance. The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject site Industrial. Pursuant to Table 2-1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Code) of the General Plan, the IL Zone is compatible with the General Plan Land Use Map designation of Industrial.
1704
B. The proposed Prezone action would not create any inconsistencies with SMC Title 16 (Development Code) since it pertains to the Zoning Map only. The text of Title 16 (Development Code) would remain unchanged under this action.

C. The proposed Prezone action would further the following General Plan policies:
i. Goal LU-4: Attract and retain companies that offer high-quality jobs with wages that are competitive with the region and state.
ii. Policy LU-4.2: Attract employment- and tax-generating businesses that support the economic diversity of the city.
iii. Policy LU-6.2: Prioritize development and redevelopment of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas.

D. The proposed Prezone action will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the City because the IL Zone designation will, as noted above, be compatible with General Plan Land Use Map designation applicable to the site.

E. The proposed Prezone action complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines, because a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared and the analysis included therein demonstrates where feasible, application of mitigation measures that would reduce the impacts to a level of less than significant, from the Project, including the Prezone action.

F. Based on the information included in the accompanying MND, the subject site would be physically suitable (including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested zoning designation and anticipated land use development.

SECTION II. PREZONING AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION
G. That the Zoning Map, attached as Exhibit 1, particularly referred to in SMC Section 16.16.030, and by reference made a part hereof, said Code is hereby amended to provide an Industrial, Limited (IL) Zone designation for Assessor’s Parcel Number 193- 020-34 immediately.

SECTION III. SEVERABILITY
If any part of this Ordinance is held invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance, and the City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance, if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted.
1705
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days after its passage.

ADOPTED:

EFFECTIVE:

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1706
APN # : 19302034
CURRENT JURISDICTION : SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CITY PLANNING AREA : STOCKTONGENERAL PLAN : I/LZONING : AU-20PROPOSED JURISDICTION : CITY OF STOCKTON PROPOSED ZONING : IL

PROJECTSITE
EXHIBIT 1
1707
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION WITH THE LOCAL

AGENCY FORMATIONCOMMISSION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 193-020-34, WITH RELATED CITY SERVICES PLAN, INCLUDING

PROPOSED DETACHMENT FROM THE FRENCH CAMP MCKINLEY FIRE DISTRICT On May 10, 2023, the applicant, Go Industrial, submitted a request to, amongst other requests, to annex Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 193-020-34, abutting portions of South McKinley Avenue; and
The petition for annexation is a formal request by an applicant to have the identified property incorporated into the City obtaining access to City services; and Pursuant to California Government Code section 56653 of the Cortese/Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission (SJLAFCo) requires that any application for a change of organization or reorganization be accompanied by a plan for providing services to the affected property; and
The applicant has proposed that services be provided pursuant to the City Services Plan attached as Exhibit 1; and
In accordance with section 56375(a)(7) of the Cortese/Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 and the policies of the SJLAFCo, the City Council has concurrently with this resolution adopted an ordinance to prezone APN 193-020-34 to Industrial, Limited (IL) Zone; and
The annexation action would also include the applicant’s requested detachment from the French Camp McKinley Rural Fire District. The detachment will be subject to an agreement by the developer to mitigate the district’s loss of property taxes. Future services, including fire services, will be provided by the City of Stockton; and On April 10, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Section 16.116.040(D), to consider the proposed Prezoning, at which all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and at said meeting the Planning Commission considered, and recommended approval to the City Council for prezoning the parcel to Industrial, Limited (IL) to conform with the General Plan land use designation of Industrial; and
On July 15, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.216.070, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard. After consideration of the project, the City Council 1708
considered and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

Annexation:

Pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code Sections 16.216.070(H)(2) and 16.216.080, the following findings of fact are made to support the annexation request:

SMC 16.216.070(H)(2)
a) The unincorporated property is within, or will be within, the urban services area of the City.

The subject territory is located within the urban services area of the City, as shown in Exhibit 2: Annexation Map.
b) The property has been prezoned with City of Stockton zoning designations.

APN 193-020-34 has been prezoned to Industrial, Limited (IL) zoning, as described above.
c) The proposal is contiguous to existing City limits.

The subject territory is contiguous to the existing City limits, as shown in Exhibit 2: Annexation Map. The subject territory abuts South McKinley Avenue which is directly to the east. The subject territory also is directly continuous to a parcel to the north, which is APN 193-020-59. d) The proposal does not split lines of assessment or ownership.

The proposed annexation does not split a line of assessment and includes a future subdivision map application to ensure property ownership lines align with the City limit boundary established by the annexation. This finding is supported by SJ LAFCo Policy 10 (Definite and Certain Boundaries) which requires: (a) all boundaries shall be and certain and conform to lines of assessment or ownership; and (b) acknowledgement by the City of Stockton that the Commission may impose a condition on the annexation requiring the recordation of a parcel map to avoid creating remnants of legal lots.
e) The proposal does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide City services.
1709
The proposal does not create islands or areas in which it would not be easy to provide City services. The subject territory includes a parcel immediately adjacent to South McKinley Avenue which has the requisite infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, stormwater) located within its right-ofway. The proposal utilizes said services without creating a feature that may make their delivery difficult to other areas.
f) The proposal is consistent with the land uses, objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan; any applicable specific plan, precise road plan, or master development Plan; and other adopted goals and policies of the City.

The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject site as Industrial. Pursuant to Table 2-1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Code) of the General Plan, the IL Zone is compatible with Industrial General Plan Land Use Map designation.

The proposed annexation would further the following General Plan policies:
 Goal LU-4: Attract and retain companies that offer high-quality jobs with wages that are competitive with the region and state.  Policy LU-4.2: Attract employment- and tax-generating businesses that support the economic diversity of the City.  Policy LU-6.2: Prioritize development and redevelopment of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas.

SMC 16.216.080
A) The proposal is contiguous to existing County boundaries or other jurisdiction(s) party to the detachment or reorganization.

B) The County Surveyor has determined that the boundaries of the proposal are definite and certain.
1710
The County Surveyor has determined that the boundaries of the proposal are definite and certain.

C) The proposal does not split lines of assessment or ownership.

The proposal does not split lines of assessment or ownership.

D) The proposal does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide appropriate services.

The proposed annexation does not split a line of assessment and includes a future subdivision map application to ensure property ownership lines align with the City limit boundary established by the annexation. This finding is supported by San Joaquin County Local Formation Agency Commission Policy 10 (Definite and Certain Boundaries) which requires:
(a) all boundaries shall be and certain and conform to lines of assessment or ownership; and (b) acknowledgement by the City of Stockton that the Commission may impose a condition on the annexation requiring the recordation of a parcel map to avoid creating remnants of legal lots.

E) The proposal is consistent with the land uses, objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan or master development plan, and other adopted goals and policies of the City and other applicable jurisdiction(s).

Consistency of the annexation proposed with these policies is demonstrated through its ability to enable development of a new industrial land use in a vacant and contiguous location to the existing City limits. 1711
Conclusion
As referenced above, per SMC 16.216.070(H)(2) and 16.216.080, all findings of fact can be made to approve the annexation request.

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated here by reference.

2. The City Council considered and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

3. The City Manager is authorized to file with the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission, as described in Exhibit 1 (City Services Plan), and Exhibit 2 (Annexation Map).

4. The San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the above-noted annexation of territory to the City of Stockton as depicted on Exhibit 2, Annexation Map.

5. The City Manager is authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED July 15, 2025 .

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1712

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW DRAFT

ANNEXATION REPORT

GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION
ANNEXATION FILE NO. ________
JANUARY 18, 2024

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT INFORMATION
This report provides background information and analysis in support of the proposed George Oliver (GO) Industrial Annexation to the City of Stockton. The report addresses annexation compliance with applicable San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) rules and regulations, describes the plan for provision of City services to the annexation area, analyzes the fiscal effects of the annexation, and documents the availability of adequate potable water supply to the project. The contents of this document are as follows:

1.0 Introduction and Project Information

2.0 Consistency of Proposed Annexation with LAFCo Policy

3.0 City Services Plan for Proposed Annexation Area

4.0 Fiscal Effects of Proposed Annexation

5.0 Availability of Adequate Water Supply
The George Oliver (GO) Industrial Annexation project proposes the annexation of one parcel, APN 193-02-034, into the City of Stockton (City). The proposed annexation area, hereinafter referred to as the “subject site,” is located on 6505 South McKinley Avenue south of Stockton (Figures 1 through 5). The Stockton city limits are on the northern boundary of the subject site. The subject site is approximately 11.7 acres.

The subject site is currently within the land use jurisdiction of San Joaquin County; it has a County General Plan designation of Limited Industrial (I/L) and a zoning designation of AU-20 (Agriculture-Urban Reserve; 20-acre minimum parcel size). The subject site is designated Industrial in the City of Stockton General Plan, as is much of the surrounding area. The subject site is within the City of Stockton's existing Sphere of Influence but is outside the 10-year planning horizon.

The City has received and is processing an application for annexation, pre-zoning, and industrial development of the subject site, including preparation of an environmental review document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The project proposes to pre-zone the subject site as IL – Industrial, Limited. The City approvals, which will take effect upon annexation of the subject site to the City, would permit proposed development of a warehouse building approximately 184,200 square feet EXHIBIT 1
1713
in floor area (Figure 6), along with associated on-site utility services, site improvements (Figure 7) and an extension of a City sewer line to the subject site (Figure 8). Proposed pre-zoning and development are consistent with the existing Industrial designation under the City’s General Plan.

2.0 CONSISTENCY OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH LAFCO POLICY

REQUIREMENTS
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (California Government Code Section 56000 et seq.) provides LAFCo with its authority, procedures, and functions. The Act gives LAFCo power to “approve or disapprove with or without amendment, wholly, partially or conditionally,” proposals concerning the formation of cities and special districts, annexation or detachment of territory to/from cities and special districts, and other changes in jurisdiction or organization of local government agencies.

Criteria for project consistency with the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act are identified in California Government Code Section 56668. Evaluation for the necessary findings of consistency of the proposed annexation with Section 56668 is shown in the following narrative. The narrative provides information in support of each of the subject findings for the proposed annexation as summarized in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1
PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH SECTION 56668
Factors Considered Consistency Finding
(a) Population and population density;
land area and land use; assessed valuation;
topography, natural boundaries, and
drainage basins; proximity to other
populated areas; and the likelihood of
significant growth in the area, and in
adjacent incorporated and unincorporated
areas, during the next 10 years.

The project is consistent with this factor.

The subject site is designated for
Industrial use under the Stockton General
Plan. The project site is adjacent to the
Stockton City limits to the north and east,
and French Camp Slough forms a natural
boundary between City and County.

Significant industrial/
warehouse development has occurred in
the area, and the proposed development
on the subject site would be consistent
with this. The Stockton Municipal
Services Review (MSR) is expected to be
modified to include the subject site in the
10-year planning horizon.
(b) The need for organized community
services; the present cost and adequacy of
governmental services and controls in the
The project is consistent with this factor.

This document contains the City Services
Plan for the subject site, which describes
EXHIBIT 1
1714
Factors Considered Consistency Finding
area; probable future needs for those
services and controls; and probable effect
of the proposed incorporation, formation,
annexation, or exclusion and of alternative
courses of action on the cost and adequacy
of services and controls in the area and
adjacent areas.
services that will be available to the
subject site, the means which these
services will be provided, and project
impacts on affected public agencies. The
subject site can be provided with public
services by the City of Stockton and other
existing agencies.
(c) The effect of the proposed action and
of alternative actions, on adjacent areas,
on mutual social and economic interests,
and on the local governmental structure of
the county.

The project is in a developing industrial
area, and the site is designated for
industrial development. The site would be
transferred from the jurisdiction of San
Joaquin County to the City of Stockton.

This would have no significant impact on
either entity. The site would be detached
from the French Camp-McKinley Fire
District. However, as described in Section

4.3, it is expected that adverse revenue
impacts to the Fire District would be
avoided.
(d) The conformity of both the proposal
and its anticipated effects with both the
adopted commission policies on providing
planned, orderly, efficient patterns of
urban development, and the policies and
priorities in Section 56377.

The project is in a developing industrial
area, and the site is designated for
industrial development. The proposed
annexation would permit a logical
extension of existing ongoing industrial
development in the southeast Stockton
region.
(e) The effect of the proposal on
maintaining the physical and economic
integrity of agricultural lands, as defined
by Section 56016.

The project is consistent with this factor.

An Agricultural Conversion Statement
prepared for the project found that no
agricultural land, as defined by CEQA
Guidelines Appendix G or by the CorteseKnox-Hertzberg Act, exists on the subject site.
(f) The definiteness and certainty of the
boundaries of the territory, the
nonconformance of proposed boundaries
with lines of assessment or ownership, the
creation of islands or corridors of
The project is consistent with this factor.

The subject site is adjacent to the City
boundary to the north and east and
represents a logical extension of those
boundaries. No islands or corridors of
unincorporated territory would be created.

EXHIBIT 1
1715
Factors Considered Consistency Finding
unincorporated territory, and other similar
matters affecting the proposed boundaries.
(g) A regional transportation plan adopted
pursuant to Section 65080.

The project is consistent with this factor.

The SJCOG adopted a Regional
Transportation Plan in 2022, and the
project would not conflict with the goals
and projects in the adopted Regional
Transportation Plan.
(h) The proposal's consistency with city or
county general and specific plans.

The project is consistent with this factor.

The subject site has been designated for
Industrial use by the Stockton General
Plan and has been zoned AgricultureUrban Reserve by San Joaquin County, indicating anticipated future urban
development.
(i) The sphere of influence of any local
agency that may be applicable to the
proposal being reviewed.

The project is consistent with this factor.

The subject site is within the City of
Stockton Sphere of Influence, as indicated
in the Stockton MSR.
(j) The comments of any affected local
agency or other public agency.

To date, no comments from local agencies
have been received. A CEQA document
for the project is in preparation and will
be released for review by local agencies.
(k) The ability of the newly formed or
receiving entity to provide the services
that are the subject of the application to
the area, including the sufficiency of
revenues for those services following the
proposed boundary change.

The project is consistent with this factor.

This document contains the City Services
Plan for the subject site, which describes
services that will be available to the
subject site, the means by which these
services will be provided, and impacts on
affected public agencies. The subject site
can be provided with public services by
the City of Stockton and other agencies.
(l) Timely availability of water supplies
adequate for projected needs as specified
in Section 65352.5.

The project is consistent with this factor.

Sections 3.1 and 5.0 of this document
evaluate water supplies and their
adequacy to support the proposed
development.

EXHIBIT 1
1716
Factors Considered Consistency Finding
(m) The extent to which the proposal will
affect a city or cities and the county in
achieving their respective fair shares of
the regional housing needs as determined
by the appropriate council of governments
consistent with Article 10.6 (commencing
with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of
Division 1 of Title 7.

As the proposed development of the
subject site would be for industrial use,
the project would have no impact on
shares of regional housing needs.
(n) Any information or comments from
the landowner or landowners, voters, or
residents of the affected territory.

No comments have been received from
landowners, voters, or residents on the
proposed annexation.
(o) Any information relating to existing
land use designations.

The project is consistent with this factor.

The subject site has been designated for
Industrial use by the Stockton General
Plan and has been zoned AgricultureUrban Reserve by San Joaquin County, indicating anticipated future urban
development.
(p) The extent to which the proposal will
promote environmental justice.

The CEQA document for the project will
discuss environmental justice issues
associated with the proposed
development. The project is expected to
provide additional jobs that would be
available to lower-income residents. The
project is in an industrial area with no
nearby residential communities; as such,
it is not expected to impose
environmental burdens on such
communities.
(q) Information contained in a local
hazard mitigation plan, information
contained in a safety element of a general
plan, and any maps that identify land as a
very high fire hazard zone pursuant to
Section 51178 or maps that identify land
determined to be in a state responsibility
area pursuant to Section 4102 of the
The subject site is not within a State
Responsibility Area as indicated by the
Fire Hazard Severity Zone map prepared
for State Responsibility Areas in San
Joaquin County by CalFire.

EXHIBIT 1
1717
Factors Considered Consistency Finding
Public Resources Code, if it is determined
that such information is relevant to the
area that is the subject of the proposal.

3.0 CITY SERVICES PLAN
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 56653, the San Joaquin LAFCo requires that any application for a change of organization or reorganization be accompanied by a plan for providing services. The plan must include the following information:
(a) An enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory.
(b) The level and range of those services.
(c) An indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory.
(d) An indication of any improvements or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other conditions the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory if the change of organization or reorganization is completed.
(e) Information with respect to how those services will be financed.

The following City Services Plan meets the above requirements (a) through (d) with respect to annexation of the subject site. The subject site would require extension of existing City services, including public safety and utilities. Overall, existing public services, with improvements proposed as part of the project, would be adequate to serve the subject site and planned industrial development. The proposed level and range of services to be provided are described in more detail below. The design and construction of required infrastructure improvements, both on- and off-site, will be the responsibility of the project developers, as will be required by project conditions of approval and subject to engineering approval by the City. Information with respect to how those services will be financed is provided in Section 4.0, which will meet requirement (e) above.

The City of Stockton provides a full range of municipal services. These municipal services include public safety (police, fire, paramedics, building), sanitation (solid waste disposal, sanitary wastewater, and stormwater utility), potable water utility, community development, library, parks and recreation, and general administrative services. Public safety and general services will be extended to the subject site upon annexation. Utility services will be provided upon completion and connection of required on-site and off-site improvements.

EXHIBIT 1
1718

3.1 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE
Water systems in the City of Stockton Metropolitan Area use a combination of treated surface water and pumped groundwater from City wells. Stockton water purveyors include the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities Department (COSMUD), California Water Service Company, and San Joaquin County maintenance districts. Should the annexation be approved, water service to the subject site would be provided by COSMUD. COSMUD provides water to service areas in North Stockton and South Stockton; the subject site is in the South Stockton service area.

Sources of water provided by COSMUD include purchases from the Stockton East Water District (SEWD) and the Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID), groundwater wells, and surface water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta through the City’s Delta Water Supply Project (DWSP). Water from SEWD is treated at its water treatment plant east of Stockton. Prior to operation of the DWSP in 2012, the City’s planned delivery and allocation of SEWD treated water was 17,500 acre-feet per year, which was 37.6 percent of SEWD’s total supplies. As of 2020, the City used 6,939 acre-feet from SEWD. The City augments this water supply with purchases from the WID. By agreement, the City purchases 6,500 acre-feet of water annually from the WID for municipal and industrial use, with another 6,500 acre-feet to become potentially available annually by 2030.

The DWSP provides the majority of the potable water supply for the City’s service areas.

It draws water from the San Joaquin River and treats the water at a plant in north Stockton.

This plant currently treats an average of 30 million gallons per day (mgd). The projected 2035 capacity of the DWSP is 60 mgd, with an annual production of approximately 50,000 acre-feet per year. The City’s supply from the San Joaquin River is curtailed annually from February through June of each year due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

The DWSP has the objectives of reducing groundwater overdraft and of protecting the underlying groundwater basin from further saltwater intrusion and water quality degradation. Extensive groundwater pumping in the past has caused movement of the saline waters eastward from under the Delta. With the DWSP now online, the City uses less groundwater in wet and average years, but it increases groundwater use in dry years to make up for reductions in surface water deliveries. The City has determined that the sustainable groundwater yield is 0.75 acre-feet per acre per year, equivalent to a groundwater yield of approximately 50,000 acre-feet per year. Based on available monitoring data, extraction rates appear to be below the maximum sustainable yield of the groundwater basin. Table 2 below shows the available water supply and projected demand with the project.

The South Stockton water system pumps from groundwater wells and receives surface water from the SEWD Water Treatment Plant, supplied in large part by the DWTP. There are seven active groundwater wells. with pump design flows ranging from 900 to 2,500 gallons per minute. Surface water from the SEWD Water Treatment Plant is supplied to the South Stockton water distribution system via a 42-inch diameter pipeline from the plant known as the South Stockton Aqueduct.

EXHIBIT 1
1719
TABLE 2

WATER SUPPLY AND PROJECT WATER DEMAND
2025 2035 2045
Projected City Water Supply (acre-feet) 77,300 85,200 85,400 Projected Water Demand (acre-feet) 34,789 43,161 48,444 Project Demand (acre-feet)* 16 16 16
Water Surplus (acre-feet) 42,495 42,023 36,940
Source: City of Stockton 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. * See Section 5.0 of this document for how this demand was estimated.

The South Stockton water system distributes water from the DWSP, SEWD, and groundwater wells. The entire system is one pressure zone with the lowest elevation (5 feet above mean sea level) on the western side of the system and the highest elevation (30 feet above mean sea level) on the eastern side. Additionally, there are two tanks, each with a capacity of three million gallons, located near the Weston Ranch Subdivision in southwest Stockton. City distribution lines provide water service to development in the South Stockton area.

The subject site is currently within the service area for the Stockton potable water system, and connection to the system will be available upon annexation. On-site lines would be installed to provide water to future development, and the on-site water system would connect to the City’s system through a new water main extension. The developer(s) will comply with plumbing, metering, and other water conservation measures in effect in the City of Stockton, including the policies in the City's 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). The existing water connection fee charged by COSMUD for non-residential development varies from approximately $2,264 to $293,754 or higher, depending on the size of the water meter.

3.2 WASTEWATER
The subject site is not presently connected to a wastewater collection and treatment system and contains no individual wastewater disposal systems. Should the annexation be approved, the subject site would be served by the City’s existing wastewater collection and treatment system.

The Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facility (RWCF) provides primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater gathered from the city as a whole. The RWCF has a designed flow capacity of 55 mgd and average daily flow rate of 31.7 mgd.

Treated effluent from the RWCF is dechlorinated and discharged to the San Joaquin River.

EXHIBIT 1
1720
The RWCF operations are regulated by the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit.

The City’s wastewater collection system is divided into 14 designated subareas or “systems.” The subject site would upon annexation be incorporated within Wastewater Collection System No. 8. Pump stations are located throughout Stockton and are integral to the sanitary sewer collection system. Most of the pump stations discharge to pressure lines that convey flow directly to the RWCF or to an available gravity sewer.

There are currently no sewer mains on or adjacent to the project site. The developer proposes an extension of a 10-inch sewer line along McKinley Avenue to the subject site from an existing 10-inch sanitary sewer main located in McKinley Avenue, near Sperry Road to the north. On-site sewer lines will be installed to provide service to future development, and the on-site system would connect to the proposed sewer extension. An onsite pump station would be necessary with the proposed extension.

The subject site is within the South of Calaveras River Sanitary Connection fee area. The existing sewer connection fee in that area is $2,850 per single family residential unit equivalent.

3.3 STORM DRAINAGE
The City of Stockton is situated just east of the Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta, a lowlying region of sloughs and channels near the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers. Waters in the Delta region eventually discharge into Suisun Bay. The city and surrounding areas depend on creeks, rivers, and sloughs to collect and convey storm runoff to the San Joaquin River and the Delta. The primary watercourses include the San Joaquin River, Bear Creek, Mosher Slough, Five Mile Slough, Fourteen Mile Slough, Calaveras River and Stockton Diverting Canal, Smith Canal, and French Camp and Walker Sloughs. The subject site is adjacent to French Camp Slough, which is a tributary of the San Joaquin River.

The Stormwater Utility Division of COSMUD operates and maintains 620 miles of storm drains, 72 pump stations, and over 100 discharge pipes that collect and route runoff from the streets and gutters to local rivers, creeks, and sloughs. Most storm drains and pump stations have adequate capacity to collect stormwater. There are currently no storm drainage mains on or adjacent to the project site.

Like other industrial development in the vicinity, subject site development will include new onsite stormwater collection and detention facilities. On-site runoff, along with runoff from the adjacent segment of McKinley Avenue, would be collected by storm drains and conveyed to two parallel underground storage pipes, each approximately 750 feet long by 8 feet wide. The runoff would be held in these pipes until it can be discharged to a ditch along the northern boundary of the subject site. Runoff discharged into this ditch would eventually reach French Camp Slough, which has not been identified as a stream with issues regarding capacity to accept storm drainage. On this basis, potential project impacts related to flooding are considered less than significant with implementation of proposed EXHIBIT 1
1721
on-site storm drainage features and compliance with the City’s water quality permit, described below.

Stormwater discharges from the Stockton urbanized area contain substantial urban runoff pollution. Five Mile Slough, Mosher Slough, the Stockton Deep Water Channel, and the San Joaquin River are listed as “water quality impaired”. The City of Stockton is responsible for controlling storm water pollution and protecting water quality. This is accomplished through local management of the federal and state programs for implementation of the Clean Water Act’s NPDES program. Stormwater quality is governed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. R5- 2016-0040, NPDES No. CAS0085324. The City’s Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance and the Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance establish local oversight of the general permit system and effective control of storm water quality impacts.

The design of drainage facilities is regulated by the City. The City Department of Public Works Standard Specifications Section 71, Sanitary Sewers and Storm Sewers, and Section 79, Storm Water Basins, cover much of the design criteria for these facilities.

The City’s General Plan includes policies that require that stormwater drainage planning be addressed in conjunction with new development, including requirements for inclusion of Best Management Practices (BMPs) that reduce stormwater runoff pollution in new development. Any costs associated with new facilities, including ongoing maintenance of these facilities, must be met or offset by the project.

3.4 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
City ordinance requires collection of municipal refuse. This ordinance would apply to development on the subject site upon annexation. The City’s franchise haulers provide solid waste collection in Stockton. The waste provider bills the property owner monthly for collection service, based on the size of collection container utilized. Industrial waste – such as construction and demolition debris and waste generated by industrial operations – may only be collected and hauled with a valid City-issued Industrial Waste Collector Permit. There are currently two waste haulers permitted to collect and transport industrial waste within the City of Stockton limits: Republic Services and Waste Management.

Solid waste generated in the City of Stockton is disposed of at existing County-owned and private landfill facilities. There is currently no shortage of space available at the Countyowned landfills, with one estimated to have available capacity to 2048 and another to 2082.

Recent information regarding individual jurisdiction diversion of solid waste from landfills is no longer available. The most recent information from 2006 indicates that about 33% of the City of Stockton’s solid waste is landfilled while the remainder is handled by one or more of the City’s waste diversion (recycling) programs. To increase construction and demolition debris recycling, the City adopted a Construction and Demolition Debris Ordinance in 2008; the ordinance requires construction and demolition contractors to divert from the landfill 50% of all waste generated, by weight, and to document these reductions in written reports filed with the City. Upon annexation of the subject site, construction associated with future development will be subject to this ordinance.

EXHIBIT 1
1722

3.5 NATURAL GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND CATV SERVICES Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) currently provides both natural gas and electricity services to the vicinity of the subject site. Local telephone service is provided by AT&T, and cable television service is provided by Xfinity. These systems are obligated to extend service to the subject site on request. Developer/utility company cost-sharing agreements for improvements needed to provide these services will be executed during the design and construction process as required by franchise agreements.

3.6 POLICE PROTECTION
Law enforcement services to the subject site currently are provided by the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department. Should the subject site be annexed, law enforcement would become the responsibility of the Stockton Police Department. The Police Department serves the area within City limits, covering more than 65 square miles. As of February 2021, the Police Department consists of 486 sworn officers, 47 police telecommunicators, and 179 civilian staff. The staffing level is determined each year by the Stockton City Council and is subject to change as the Council, City Manager, and Chief of Police determine the needs of the city.

The service area is organized into six Community Policing Districts, one of which (Park) is adjacent to the subject site. It is the Police Department’s policy to respond to all emergency calls within three to five minutes. Currently, there are no adopted service levels for the Police Department; however, it is understood that a higher level of service may be required as population increases. The project would receive law enforcement service during construction as well as upon completion of development.

Capital costs of Police Department expansion are accounted for by the City’s Public Facilities Fee program. The City of Stockton has adopted a Public Facility Fee for police facilities payable upon issuance of a building permit. For warehouse/low density land uses, the fee is $62 per 1,000 square feet. Additionally, Stockton’s voters approved Measure A, which instituted a three-quarter cent (0.75%) sales tax to provide funding for law enforcement, crime prevention services, and other essential City services. City voters also approved Measure W, which instituted a one-quarter cent (0.25%) sales tax to provide funding for law enforcement and fire protection services.

3.7 FIRE PROTECTION
The subject site is currently within the French Camp-McKinley Fire Protection District, which serves approximately 16 square miles of unincorporated San Joaquin County centered around the community of French Camp south of Stockton. The Fire District serves the unincorporated area of San Joaquin County between Stockton and Lathrop, and it provides service to the Mountain House community under contract. The nearest Fire District station to the subject site is French Camp Fire Station 11-1 in the community of French Camp at 310 French Camp Road, approximately one-half mile to the south.

EXHIBIT 1
1723
Should annexation occur, the subject site would be detached from the French CampMcKinley Fire District, and fire protection services would become the responsibility of the Stockton Fire Department. The Fire Department provides fire protection, fire prevention, paramedic emergency medical, and other related services to all areas of the City of Stockton and on a contract basis to the Lincoln, Eastside, Boggs Tract, and Country Club Fire Districts. Specific services provided include fire hydrant maintenance, training, fire dispatch, hazardous materials intervention, and weed abatement services. The Fire Department currently serves an area of about 86 square miles and has about 181 total personnel.

The Fire Department currently has twelve stations located throughout the greater Stockton metropolitan area. The closest station to the subject site is Station 5, located on 3499 Manthey Road, approximately two miles to the northwest. The station is equipped with one engine and one grass rig, and is staffed by a captain, an engineer, and a firefighter. Two of the staff are also paramedics. The Stockton General Plan has set a goal of a response time between three and of four minutes to a fire suppression incident. The average response time from Station 5 to a fire call is approximately 6.5 minutes, which is typical for stations located on the City’s periphery.

The City is currently exploring the options for construction and staffing of an additional fire station along Mariposa Road to improve Fire Department services and response times to the south Stockton area, including new industrial and warehouse development. The station is proposed to be financed by a Community Facilities District, under which a special tax would be imposed upon new development within the district boundaries. Though it is not known at this time, it is possible that the subject site would be part of this Community Facilities District. The property owner and the district would need an agreement for the subject site to become part of the district.

To provide adequate fire protection services, future development will coordinate with the Fire Department during planning and design phases to ensure site access, response time, sprinkler requirements, water system design, and hydrant placement are acceptable.

Improvements to the City of Stockton water system will also be constructed in conformance with City standards and the Uniform Fire Code fire flow standards, and hydrants will be placed in accordance with Fire Department standards. Also, the Stockton Fire Department participates in the California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement. This agreement allows the City to share resources with all fire department agencies in San Joaquin County and to request assistance from the County fire districts when additional services are required. The City currently provides most of the fire services within and around the City limits, since some of the County fire districts have reduced staffing, supply shortages, or operations on a temporary basis. The existing mutual aid agreement allows the City and County agencies to share resources when needed.

The City has required new warehouse developments to install Early Suppression Fast Response (ESFR) fire sprinkler systems. The purpose of the ESFR systems is to allow for a variety of commodities stored within the structure to be capable of meeting high-bay storage up to five feet below roof deck. They are considered the best engineered fire protection system that the National Fire Protection Association recognizes, capable of flowing up to 100 gallons per minute per nozzle. Their design purpose is to completely EXHIBIT 1
1724
extinguish the fire rather than controlling the spread of fire. Testing results from nationally recognized testing agencies have proven this. It is expected that the City will require the installation of an ESFR system as part of CEQA mitigation or conditions of approval for the project.

As with police facilities, capital costs of fire station expansion are accounted for by the City’s Public Facilities Fee program. The City of Stockton has adopted a Public Facility Fee for fire stations payable upon issuance of a building permit. For warehouse/low density land uses, the fee is $54 per 1,000 square feet. As with other Public Facility Fees, these fees would be payable upon issuance of a building permit. In addition, as noted, City voters approved Measure W, which instituted a one-quarter cent (0.25%) sales tax to provide funding for law enforcement and fire protection services.

3.8 SCHOOLS
The subject site is within the boundaries of the Manteca Unified School District (MUSD).

The nearest MUSD school to the subject site is French Camp Elementary School in the community of French Camp to the south. District-wide, MUSD student enrollment in kindergarten to 6th grade exceeds available capacity, but the high school enrollment does not do so. The MUSD collects required school impact fees and coordinates with residential developers to ensure that sufficient capacity exists within the school system to accommodate the indirect student population generated by development of the project.

The subject site is proposed for industrial development and the project would result in no residential development or student generation. Indirect student population is expected to be minimal as the majority of jobs created are anticipated to be filled by residents already living within the MUSD or other nearby areas. Nevertheless, the project would contribute developer fees from industrial development in accordance with State law. The MUSD assesses a development impact fee of $0.56 per square foot for warehouses; therefore, the project would generate an estimated $103,152 in impact fees. Project development will contribute to these fees in conjunction with building permit issuance.

3.9 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Both San Joaquin County and the City of Stockton provide park and recreational services.

The nearest City Park to the subject site is Long Park, on Woodchase Lane approximately two miles to the west of the site. Long Park, a neighborhood park, is equipped with picnic tables, a tot lot, a tennis court, a basketball court, and a softball diamond. The Stockton General Plan establishes policies and standards for the size and siting of parklands.

San Joaquin County also provides parks and recreational facilities available to the public.

The nearest County park to the subject site is the Regional Sports Complex, a facility with softball and soccer fields adjacent to Stockton Metropolitan Airport, approximately 2.5 miles east of the site.

No new residential development is proposed on the subject site. Public Facility Fees for parklands are only assessed on new residential development; industrial development as proposed is exempt from parkland fees. However, industrial development would be subject to the payment of Public Facility Fees for community recreation centers. For EXHIBIT 1
1725
warehouse/low density land uses, this fee is $23.25 per 1,000 square feet. As with other Public Facility Fees, these fees would be payable upon issuance of a building permit.

Additionally, Stockton’s voters approved Measure M, which instituted a one-quarter cent (0.25%) sales tax to provide funding for recreation and library services.

3.10 LIBRARIES
The public library system in the Stockton area is operated jointly by the City and San Joaquin County. The nearest library branch to the subject site is the Weston Ranch Branch Library at 1453 West French Camp Road in Stockton, approximately two miles to the west.

Capital costs of library expansion are accounted for by the City’s Public Facilities Fee program. The City of Stockton has adopted a Public Facility Fee for libraries payable upon issuance of a building permit. For warehouse/low density land uses, the fee is $56 per 1,000 square feet. Additionally, as noted, Stockton’s voters approved Measure M, which instituted a one-quarter cent (0.25%) sales tax to provide funding for recreation and library services.

3.11 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC FACILITIES/OTHER GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES McKinley Avenue, a public road abutting the northeastern boundary of the subject site, is currently maintained by San Joaquin County. This road is paved but does not have street improvements such as curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Proposed industrial development will require street improvements along the subject site frontage of McKinley Avenue, including additional pavement width, curb, gutter, and sidewalk, all of which would be designed and constructed by the applicant pursuant to City of Stockton standards.

With increased vehicular traffic resulting from the development of the subject site, the need for road maintenance will increase. Future development will be responsible for payment of adopted Public Facility Fees for capital street improvements and traffic signals to fund intersection and roadway segment improvements identified in the City's Street Improvement Plan. For warehouse/low density land uses, street improvement fees are $931.50 per 1,000 square feet, and traffic signal fees would be $83.25 per 1,000 square feet. The City requires that these fees be paid prior to building permit issuance.

Future development on the subject site will also be required to pay a Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF). The RTIF’s objectives are to generate funding from new development projects that impact the Regional Transportation Network and to integrate these funds with federal, state, and other local funding to make transportation improvements identified in the RTIF Program. Proposed improvements in the RTIF Program that are in the vicinity of the subject site include widening Interstate 5 from French Camp Road to State Route 120. Assuming future development involves a warehouse as anticipated, the Regional Transportation Impact Fee would be $500 per 1,000 square feet.

Measure K was passed by voters in 1990 and extended for another 30 years by voter approval in 2006. This measure instituted a one-half cent (0.50%) sales tax dedicated to transportation improvement projects in San Joaquin County. Measure K funding is allocated to specific projects including improved highways and local streets, new passenger rail service, regional and interregional bus routes, park-and-ride lots, new bicycle facilities, EXHIBIT 1
1726
and railroad crossings by the San Joaquin Council of Governments. San Joaquin County and cities within the County share 35% of the sales tax revenue for local street repair. The local jurisdictions receive an annual funding allocation for local street repairs and safety and operations improvements. The local share of Measure K funds is distributed by formula based primarily on the City’s proportionate share of the overall County population.

4.0 FINANCING OF CITY SERVICES AND FISCAL EFFECTS
California Government Code Section 56653 requires that the plan for services to a subject site include information on how the extension of services would be financed. For the purposes of this analysis, services extensions are classified as 1) public road improvements and utility services such as water, wastewater, storm water, electrical, gas and communication systems that require construction of new pipelines, power lines, pump stations or other physical facilities needed to extend urban services to the subject site, and 2) general City services such as police and fire protection would, generally speaking, be provided without major improvements to capital facilities. These concerns are addressed in the following Sections 4.1 and 4.2, respectively.

4.1 FINANCING OF ROADS AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements needed to extend public road and utility services to the site would be constructed in conjunction with the development of proposed industrial structures, access, parking and other on-site improvements. These improvements would include off-site improvements to the frontage of McKinley Avenue, any required extension of water and wastewater lines and electrical, gas and communication lines.

As prescribed in the project conditions of approval, the project will be responsible for design and construction of required improvements to City roads and utility systems in accordance with adopted City standards. Unless improvements are deferred per a specific agreement with the City, they will be constructed prior to occupancy of the project site.

The costs of extending electrical, gas and communication facilities will be borne by the project and the responsible franchise utility as prescribed in adopted rules and regulations.

Costs of operating public infrastructure for the benefit of the project will be met through existing monthly service fee systems established by the City and franchise utilities.

Long-term capital improvement needs associated with new development, including the proposed project, are met through the City's adopted PFFs, which provide for expansion of City offices, libraries, community recreation centers, fire and police stations, street improvements, park land, surface water resource development improvement, air quality, and related administrative costs as these needs are identified. Similarly, the City has also adopted development fees for sanitary sewer and water connections, traffic signals, and street trees, and various local benefit district fees. PFF and connection fee payments are required when building permits are issued, in accordance with the City’s adopted fee schedule, which is annually updated to keep pace with infrastructure and public facility costs. As a result, the City operates from year to year with a fee structure that reasonably anticipates and collects fees sufficient to meet capital improvement needs associated with new development.

EXHIBIT 1
1727
Along with the PFFs and connection fees, the City also collects development-related fees for the following:
● Agricultural Land Mitigation Program
● Air quality
● County facilities
● Surface water for SEWD ($0.228 per square feet of warehouse/0.60) ● Related administrative costs
Table 3 summarizes the estimated development-related fees for the proposed development of the subject site. These include the City impact fees listed above, along with development impact fees collected by other agencies, such as the Manteca Unified School District and SJCOG. This information is also in Exhibit 7 of this City Services Plan.

TABLE 3

ESTIMATED PUBLIC FACILITY FEES

FEE CATEGORY ESTIMATED PROJECT FEES
City Impact Fees $937,251
Habitat/Open Space (SJCOG) $225,284
School District Fees (MUSD) $103,152
TOTAL $1,265,687

4.2 FINANCING OF GENERAL SERVICES
This section describes the anticipated revenues to the City of Stockton, which would be the main provider of services. As noted above, the design, engineering, and construction of these services and infrastructure improvements will be financed by developers of the subject site, subject to approval by the City. This section also analyzes financial impacts on the French Camp-McKinley Fire District, which currently provides fire protection services to the subject site and from which the subject site would be detached upon annexation to the City.

4.2.1 Estimated Change in Annual Revenue for City of Stockton As a Charter City, the City of Stockton benefits from the same revenue sources as general law cities, as well as a utility user tax. The City receives a portion of the property tax collected within the City limits, and it receives franchise payments from electrical distribution, cable television and solid waste collection franchises. As discussed in Section

4.1, the City operates its public utilities (i.e., water and sanitary sewer) as enterprise functions, and it engages in public recreation activities on a quasi-enterprise basis, subsidized by its General Fund (e.g., golf courses, ice arena, civic auditorium).

EXHIBIT 1
1728
The major sources of revenue that will be generated by the proposed future development for the City of Stockton General Fund are summarized in Table 4 below. Revenue estimates were generated primarily on a person-served basis, which accounts for project-related population and employee growth. Please see the attached Exhibits 1-6 for more information regarding the derivation of Table 4 calculations. More detailed information regarding specific sources of revenues is provided below.

TABLE 4

ESTIMATED CITY OF STOCKTON REVENUES

RESULTING FROM ANNEXATION AND BUILDOUT OF THE SUBJECT SITE General Fund Revenue Category Total Project
Property Tax $17,269
Property Tax: In-Lieu MVF $36,150
Sales Tax $5,369
Measure A Transaction Tax $4,207
Prop. 172 Sales Tax $1,342
Document Transfer Tax $11,295
Franchise Tax $6,414
Hotel/Motel Tax $1,203
Business License $5,375
Utility Users Tax $14,507
Other Revenues $2,654
Voter-Approved Revenues (except Measure A) $5,369
TOTAL $111,154
Property Tax
Property tax rates are set at 1% of assessed property value. The potential property tax revenues resulting from the project were based on information provided by the project applicant and the current City/County Revenue Sharing Agreement for annexations. As EXHIBIT 1
1729
shown in Exhibit 3, the estimated assessed valuation on the subject site with proposed development is $23,025,000.

Approximately 61% of every property tax dollar from the subject site is currently allocated among the Manteca Unified School District, San Joaquin Delta Community College, and the State’s educational fund. This leaves an “available share” of approximately 39% of the overall property tax revenue, which is divided between the County General Fund, the French Camp-McKinley Fire District, and other County agencies. This division of the property tax is the basis for estimating the property tax the City will receive upon annexation and development of the subject site (see Exhibit 3).

Based upon information from the San Joaquin County Auditor-Controller’s Office, upon annexation, approximately 20% of total property tax revenue from the subject site would go to the City. Based on this and the anticipated valuation of the subject site once fully developed, the property tax amount that would be collected by the City would be approximately $17,269 (see Exhibit 3). Current property taxes on the subject site that go to the County General Fund are approximately $596.

Property transfer taxes are taxes charged as a percentage of the value of property that has a transfer of title. It is estimated that the amount of property transfer tax the City would receive after annexation of the subject site would be $11,295. Exhibit 3 provides details on the property transfer tax estimate. This assumes the property would be sold; no tax revenues from this source would be realized if the property does not change ownership.

In 2004, the State Legislature and the Governor agreed to a swap of city and county vehicle license fee revenue for an additional share of property tax revenue to be provided to the local governments. This Property Tax in-Lieu of Motor Vehicle Fees is a substantial source of revenue based on property taxes. It is estimated that the amount of property tax in-lieu of motor vehicle fees associated with the subject site would be $36,150. See Exhibit 3 for development of this estimate.

Sales Tax
The current sales tax rate in the City of Stockton is 9.00%, with the City receiving 2.25% of taxable sales, 1.25% of which is a result of measures approved by City voters (Measure A – 0.75%, Measure W (police and fire) – 0.25%, Measure M (library and recreation) –

0.25%), as well as from the Measure K sales tax imposed throughout San Joaquin County.

The proposed development is not a commercial land use and therefore would not directly generate sales tax. However, employees working at the proposed development would generate sales tax revenue through local spending. It is estimated that sales tax generated by employee spending would be approximately $5,369. See Exhibit 4 for development of this estimate.

In addition, the City collects sales tax revenue from Proposition 172, approved by California voters in 1993. Proposition 172 imposes a one-half cent sales tax to provide revenues for public safety services. It is estimated that sales tax generated by Proposition 172 would be approximately $1,342. Additional sales tax revenues would be provided by Measure A for law enforcement services. The project is estimated to generate approximately $4,207. See Exhibits 4 and 6 for development of these estimates.

EXHIBIT 1
1730
Utility User Tax
A utility user tax is levied against utility charges for all non-public users of gas, electric, water, telephone, and cable television services. This tax is 6% of a customer’s monthly bill.

As noted in Table 2 above, future development on the subject site would generate an estimated $14,507 annually in utility user tax revenues. See Exhibit 5 for development of the utility user tax revenue estimate.

Franchise Tax
Franchise taxes are levied upon the providers of natural gas, electric, refuse removal and cable television service. The franchise tax, which is 2% for most utilities and 3% for cable TV, is levied upon the provider rather than the customer and is charged against all utility revenues. The anticipated future development on the subject site would generate approximately $6,414 in franchise tax revenue annually (see Exhibit 1).

Business License Tax
The City of Stockton assesses a business registration fee and a license tax on any person engaged in or carrying on any profession, trade, calling, occupation, or business in the City.

Beyond a registration fee of $24, businesses are assessed at varying rates based typically on their gross receipts; gross receipts information for the annexation area is unknown.

Future development on the subject site is estimated to yield an annual business license tax revenue of $5,375 (see Exhibit 1).

Other Revenue Sources
The City has a variety of other revenue sources, which are listed in the City’s budget. These include charges for services, motor vehicle fees, and revenues from other agencies. Table 2 and Exhibit 1 list these other sources. Future development on the subject site is estimated to yield revenue of $2,654 from these other sources.

4.2.2 Estimated Change in Annual Expenditures for City of Stockton As discussed in Section 4.1, immediate and future capital costs of the project would be met through developer improvements to public road and utility systems and through payment of the City PFFs and connection fees. The project is industrial in nature and would not result in increases in the resident population of Stockton, with concurrent costs in providing City services. However, the addition of project-related employees would contribute to the “service population” of the City, which could contribute to service costs.

Impacts of proposed future development on the City’s water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage systems would be less than significant. The City’s sanitary sewer system has adequate capacity to accommodate additional wastewater from the project, and existing sewer lines in the area can carry the anticipated flow. The City’s water system has sufficient supplies to satisfy potential project demand, as discussed in Section 5.0, and no new supplies would need to be obtained. In accordance with City requirements, the project developer would construct the necessary improvements and connections to the City’s water and sewer systems and storm drainage facilities to accommodate runoff in accordance with EXHIBIT 1
1731
City standards. Expenses to operate the required City utilities to the subject site are expected to be minimal and would be covered by monthly utility billing to the project activities.

The project would place an incremental demand on the City for future fire and police services. Impacts of the project on public services provided by the City, primarily fire and police protection, would be less than significant with the installation of the fire sprinkler systems required by the City. The project in and of itself would not result in a need for new or expanded fire facilities and services, but as noted, a new fire station is planned in the south Stockton area. Future capital costs for these facilities and services would be met through payment of PFFs, CFD revenues and developer contributions.

The proposed annexation would likely include approximately 850 feet of McKinley Avenue frontage. Improvements would be installed along this frontage and are likely to include widening, turn lanes, acceleration and/or deceleration lanes, shoulders, and intersection improvements at the proposed entry, including street lighting and signage. The frontage improvements would be funded by the developer. The annexed frontage would increase costs to the City for ongoing maintenance. A rough approximation of the increased maintenance cost was obtained by dividing the total miles currently maintained by the City of Stockton into total street maintenance cost, then applying the results to the segments to be annexed. According to the FY 2022/23 budget for the City of Stockton, the City maintains 781 miles of roads at a cost of $14,090,651. Based on these figures, the additional cost to maintain the annexed frontage would be approximately $2,904 annually. Road maintenance costs are met from a variety of sources.

The project is not expected to result in additional costs for schools or parks and recreation, as the project would not increase the resident population. Nonetheless, the project would contribute to future school and park capital needs through payment of school mitigation fees and community recreation center PFFs.

An approximation of maximum potential increases in City services costs associated with the project was calculated by dividing total general fund expenditures per category by the City service population, and by multiplying that factor by the increase in service population on the subject site. Based on the expected increase in service population of 148 (see Exhibit 2), potential service costs to the City would be approximately $105,128. With an additional estimated expenditure of $4,957 related to Measure W services, total City expenditures associated with the proposed development would be $110,085. See Exhibit 8 for a development of the expenditure estimate for the subject site.

4.2.3 Overall Impact of Project on City Budget
As indicated in Table 4, proposed development of the subject site is expected to generate approximately $111,154 in annual revenues to the City. With estimated annual expenditures of $110,085, the City would have adequate annual revenues to provide services to the subject site. In addition, as indicated in Table 3, proposed future development would generate $937,251 in one-time impact fees to the City to cover expenses associated with new or expanded public facilities and services. Additional fees would be paid to MUSD and SJCOG.

EXHIBIT 1
1732
In summary, the City would expect to receive substantial revenues from proposed development of the subject site, while the expenses incurred in providing City services to the subject site would be less than the anticipated revenues. Thus, at the project level, the City would likely operate at a budget surplus.

4.3 PROPERTY TAX IMPACT TO THE FRENCH CAMP-MCKINLEY FIRE DISTRICT Based on information provided by the County Auditor-Controller's Office, the French Camp-McKinley Fire District currently receives approximately 9.4 percent of the general one-percent property tax levy from the subject site. This currently generates approximately $251 of property tax revenue for the Fire District, based on current valuation of the property. Upon annexation and development of the subject site, the assessed valuation of the site would increase substantially. However, as a part of the annexation process, the subject site would be detached from the Fire District, and the Fire District would no longer receive tax revenue from the site.

LAFCo policy dictates that adverse fiscal impacts resulting from such detachments from special districts or annexations that fail to provide adequate mitigation of the adverse impact on the district will not be approved. It is expected that the City and the Fire District will reach an agreement that will reduce adverse revenue impacts on the Fire District resulting from the proposed annexation. The City has accepted such agreements with the Montezuma Fire District for annexation projects in the southeast Stockton area. LAFCo may determine an appropriate temporary mitigation, if any, and impose that temporary mitigation to the extent it is within its powers.

5.0 AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY
As noted, California Government Code Section 56668(l) requires an assessment of the timely availability of water supplies for an annexation area. The 2020 UWMP for the City of Stockton’s water system assessed the reliability of its water supply for its service area, which includes the subject site. The UWMP includes a description of the water supply sources, projected water use, and a comparison of water supply water demands during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years. The definitions of the three water year scenarios, as described by the State Department of Water Resources, are provided below.

1. Average year is a year, or an averaged range of years in the historical sequence that most closely represents median water supply availability to the agency.

Normal and average are used interchangeably within the Department of Water Resources guidebook.

2. Single dry year is the year with the lowest water supply availability to the agency.

3. Multiple dry year is the lowest average water supply availability to the agency for a consecutive multiple-year period (three years or more) for a watershed since 1903.

As part of the 2020 UWMP, a Water Supply Reliability Assessment was conducted to determine the reliability of the City’s water supply for all three water year scenarios from EXHIBIT 1
1733
2025 to 2045. This Water Supply Reliability Assessment is currently the most up-to-date and reliable source of information regarding the City’s long-term water supplies and their reliability. Under the normal water year scenario, water supply would exceed demand by 36,956 to 47,322 acre-feet per year. Under the single dry water year scenario, supply would exceed demand by 13,656 to 21,311 acre-feet per year. Under the fourth year of a multiple dry year scenario, the differences between supply and demand would be at their lowest, with supply exceeding demand by 12,456 to 19,652 acre-feet per year. In a fifth consecutive dry year, the differences between supply and demand are anticipated to increase as SEWD water supply is expected to return to a normal year volume at that time.

The City of Stockton adopted a Water Master Plan Update in 2021. The update included water use factors used in determined water usage by future development in Stockton. The water use factor for industrial uses was 1.4 acre-feet per year per acre. Based on this factor, the anticipated water usage by the proposed development on the subject site would be 16.38 acre-feet per year. As shown in Table 2, the City would have adequate water supplies to accommodate the use by proposed development on the subject site.

EXHIBIT 1
1734
EXHIBITS 1-6

ESTIMATED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCES
EXHIBIT 1
1735
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION

CITY OF STOCKTON GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
Revenue Category
2022-23
City Budget
Revenue per
Person Served
Service
Population Total Project
Property Tax $41,490,000 - - $17,269
Property Tax: In-Lieu MVF $29,165,000 - - $36,150
Sales Tax $66,824,000 - - $5,369
Measure A Transaction Tax $42,080,000 - - $4,207
Prop. 172 Sales Tax $3,109,000 - - $1,342
Document Transfer Tax $1,200,000 - - $11,295
Franchise Tax $17,124,630 $43.34 148 $6,414
Hotel/Motel Tax $3,211,540 $8.13 148 $1,203
Business License $14,350,000 $36.32 148 $5,375
Utility Users Tax $38,731,176 $98.02 148 $14,507
Licenses and Permits $401,331 - - -
Revenue from Other Agencies $3,903,325 $9.88 148 $1,462 Motor Vehicle License $200,000 $0.51 148 $75
Charges for Services $2,981,472 $7.55 148 $1,117
Fire Contracts $4,705,270 - - -
Code Enforcement $3,959,457 - - -
Fines and Forfeitures $548,863 - - -
Sale of Fixed Assets $60,000 - - -
Interfund Reimbursements $9,091,873 - - -
Transfers In $0 - - -
Subtotal - General Fund Revenues $285,410,685 $105,785
EXHIBIT 1
1736
Measures M, W Revenues $28,027,000 - - $2,684
Measure K Revenues $8,842,461 - - $2,685
TOTAL REVENUES $320,280,146 -- -- $111,154
Source: DPFG, Economic Benefit Report, Mariposa Industrial Park, City of Stockton, CA, February 4, 2022.

EXHIBIT 1
1737
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS SUMMARY
I. NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
Non-Residential Land Uses Square Feet Average Value
(square foot)[1]
Industrial/Warehouse 184,200 $125
TOTAL 184,200 –
II. CITY DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
City of Stockton Population [2] 322,489
City of Stockton Employees [3] 145,271
City of Stockton Persons Served [4] 395,125
III. PROJECT DEMOGRAPHICS
Employees [5] 295
Total Employees 295
Persons Served Population [6] 148
Sources:
[1] DPFG, Economic Benefit Report, Mariposa Industrial Park, City of Stockton, CA, February 4, 2022. [2] California Department of Finance, E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1-1-2022. [3] City of Stockton Fiscal Year 2023/23 Budget.
[4] City population plus 50% of employees.
[5] Assumes 625 square feet per employee, per USGBC.
[6] Assumes 50% of employees.

EXHIBIT 1
1738
EXHIBIT 3
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION

PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
I. GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ASSUMPTIONS
Pre-Annexation - 1% General Property Tax Breakdown [1]
Public Agency Property Tax Breakdown
County General Fund 22.3%
French Camp-McKinley Fire Protection District 9.4%
School districts and other agencies 68.3%
TOTAL 100.00%
Property Tax Allocation Upon Annexation [1]
Public Agency Property Tax Breakdown
County General Fund 30.2%
City of Stockton 7.5%
School districts and other agencies 62.3%
TOTAL 100.00%
II. SECURED PROPERTY TAX ANALYSIS
Nonresidential Land
Use Type
Square Feet Estimated
Valuation
1% General
Property Tax
Property Tax
to City
Industrial 184,200 $23,025,000 $230,025 $17,269
III. PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER ANALYSIS
Nonresidential Land
Use Type
Property
Turnover Rate
Estimated Assessed
Valuation Turnover
Property Transfer
Tax to City
Total Estimated
Transfer Tax
Industrial 5.00% $20,535,000 0.055% $11,295
EXHIBIT 1
1739
IV. PROPERTY TAX VEHICLE LICENSE FEE ANALYSIS
Nonresidential Land
Use Type
Total City Assessed
Valuation with
Project[1]
Percent Change in
Assessed Valuation
Total Property Tax
In-Lieu of VLF
Adopted Revenue[1]
Estimated Property
Tax In-Lieu of MVF
Industrial $26,167,715,583 1.57% $26,791,495 $36,150
Source: DPFG, Economic Benefit Report, Mariposa Industrial Park, City of Stockton, CA, February 4, 2022. [1] Fiscal Year 2021-22. Breakdown of public agency revenue shares provided by San Joaquin County Assessor’s Office.

EXHIBIT 1
1740
EXHIBIT 4
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION

SALES TAX REVENUE ANALYSIS
I. DIRECT SALES TAX ANALYSIS
Nonresidential Land Use
Type
Taxable Spending per
Employee per Day [1]
Employees Total Taxable
Spending[2]
Industrial $10 295 $767,000
TOTAL -- 295 $767,000
Leakage (30%) $230,100
City of Stockton Capture (70%) $536,900
City of Stockton General Fund Sales and Use Tax Revenues:

City Taxable Spending Capture $536,900
City Share of Sales Tax 1.00% $5,369
Project-Derived Sales Tax Revenue to City $5,369
Prop. 172 Sales Tax 0.25% $1,342
[1] Source: DPFG, Economic Benefit Report, Mariposa Industrial Park, City of Stockton, CA, February 4, 2022. [2] Assumes 260 working days per year.

EXHIBIT 1
1741
EXHIBIT 5
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION

UTILITY USERS TAX REVENUE ANALYSIS
Revenue per
Person[1]
Service
Population[2]
Total Project
Revenue
Utility Users Tax $98.02 148 $14,507
[1] See Exhibit 1.
[2] See Exhibit 2.

EXHIBIT 1
1742
EXHIBIT 6
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION

VOTER APPROVED REVENUE ANALYSIS
Project Taxable
Spending [1] Tax Rate Project Revenue
San Joaquin County (Measure K) Sales Tax $536,900 0.500% $2,685 Stockton Safe Neighborhood Gang and Drug Prevention
Police & Fire (Measure W)
$536,900 0.250% $1,342
Law Enforcement, Crime Prevention, Essential City
Services (Measure A)
$536,900 0.750% $4,027
Library and Recreation ‐ Strong Communities Special
Tax (Measure M)
$536,900 0.250% $1,342
TOTAL $9,396
[1] See Exhibit 4.

EXHIBIT 1
1743
EXHIBIT 7

PUBLIC FACILITY AND IMPACT FEE SUMMARY
EXHIBIT 1
1744
EXHIBIT 7
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION

PUBLIC FACILITY AND IMPACT FEE SUMMARY
Fee Category Estimated Project Fees
City Impact Fees $937,251
School District Fees (MUSD) $103,152
Habitat/Open Space (SJCOG) $225,284
TOTAL $1,265,687
EXHIBIT 1
1745
EXHIBIT 8

ESTIMATED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
EXHIBIT 1
1746
EXHIBIT 8
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GOINDUSTRIAL ANNEXATION

ESTIMATED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
I. CITY EXPENDITURES
Program Appropriations City Budget [1]
Expense Per
Person
Service
Population Total Project
Police $148,950,532 $388.40 148 $57,483
Fire $53,398,905 $139.24 148 $20,607
Administration $20,823,160 $54.30 148 $8,036
Public Works $19,301,426 $50.33 148 $7,449
Community Services $7,761,000 $20.24 148 $2,996
Economic Development $5,348,168 $4.78 148 $707
Capital Improvements $12,100,000 $31.55 148 $4,669
Debt Service $6,953,050 - - $0
Other Programs $8,240,530 $21.49 148 $3,181
Subtotal - - - $105,128
Measure W Expenditures $12,845,623 $33.50 148 $4,957
TOTAL - - - $110,085
II. PROJECT EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS
2022 City of Stockton Persons Served Population [2]: 395,125 Persons Served Population on Subject Site [2]: 148
Total Subject Site Expenditures: $110,085
[1] Source: City of Stockton Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget [2] See Exhibit 2.

EXHIBIT 1
1747
BaseCamp
Figure 1
BaseCamp Environmental REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
San Diego Imperial
Orange
Riverside
San Bernardino
Ventura Los Angeles
Santa Barbara
Kern San Luis
Obispo
Inyo
Tulare
Kings Monterey
Fresno
San
Benito
Mono
Madera
Mariposa
Tuolumne
Calaveras
Amador
El Dorado
Sacramento
Alpine
Santa
Clara
San
Joaquin
Contra
Costa
Merced
Marin
Napa
Yolo
Solano
Sutter
Placer
Nevada
Sierra
Plumas
Glenn Butte
Lake
Mendocino
Tehama
Colusa Yuba
Sonoma
Stanislaus Alameda
Santa Cruz
San Mateo
San Francisco
www.csac.counties.org

PROJECT LOCATION
EXHIBIT 1
1748
BaseCamp
Figure 2
BaseCamp Environmental STREET MAP

PROJECT SITE
EXHIBIT 1
1749
BaseCamp
Figure 3
BaseCamp Environmental USGS MAP

PROJECT SITE
EXHIBIT 1
1750
BaseCamp
Figure 4
BaseCamp Environmental AERIAL PHOTO

PROJECT SITE
SOURCE: Google Maps
EXHIBIT 1
1751
Figure 5
BaseCamp Environmental ASSESSOR PARCEL MAP

PROJECT SITE
EXHIBIT 1
1752
BaseCamp
Figure 6
BaseCamp Environmental CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
SOURCE: HPA Architecture
EXHIBIT 1
1753
Figure 7
BaseCamp Environmental PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
SOURCE: Kier+Wright
EXHIBIT 1
1754
Figure 8
BaseCamp Environmental PROPOSED SEWER EXTENSION
SOURCE: Kier+Wright
EXHIBIT 1
1755
Z:\2022\A22058\DOCS\SURVEY\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS\A22058-LD ANNEX.docx LAFC __-25
______________________

TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON
EXHIBIT “A” - Annexation Legal Description

ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT DEED TO REVOCABLE TRUST RECORDED MARCH 22, 2024 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2024-024121, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN

JOAQUIN COUNTY AND A PORTION OF PARCEL THREE OF THE TRUST TRANSFER DEED RECORDED MARCH 30, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016-035593, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN

JOAQUIN COUNTY AND A PORTION OF SOUTH MCKINLEY AVENUE AND A PORTION OF THE

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD(FORMERLY WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT MARKING THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF MCKINLEY AVENUE

WITH THE CENTERLINE OF AN UNNAMED SLOUGH, WHICH EXTENDS EASTERLY FROM THE FRENCH CAMP SLOUGH AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF SURVEY FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 31 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 77, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID DEED (2024-024121) AND BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH MCKINLEY AVENUE;
THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 79° 16’ 00” EAST, 136.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD.

THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD SOUTH 10° 44’ 00” EAST, 1441.45 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EXTENTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID DEED (2024-024121);

THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENTION AND SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLY LINES OF SAID DEED (2024-024121) FOR THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
1) NORTH 53° 39' 06" WEST, 845.17 FEET,
2) NORTH 29° 16' 34" WEST, 185.33 FEET,
3) NORTH 55° 56' 40" WEST, 221.79 FEET,
4) NORTH 02° 55' 39" EAST, 270.60 FEET, AND
5) NORTH 09° 16' 08" WEST, 200.22 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID DEED (2024- 024121);
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE FOR THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
1) NORTH 61° 04' 00" EAST, 108.00 FEET,
2) NORTH 58° 59' 00" EAST, 130.95 FEET,
3) SOUTH 72° 27' 00" EAST, 190.33 FEET,
4) NORTH 68° 27' 00" EAST, 98.80 FEET, AND
EXHIBIT 2
1756
Z:\2022\A22058\DOCS\SURVEY\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS\A22058-LD ANNEX.docx 5) NORTH 67° 36' 00" EAST, 98.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 760,456 SQUARE FEET OR 17.4577 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DESCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66410) AND MAY NOT BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR AN OFFER FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED.

EXHIBIT “B” A PLAT IS ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.

KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS, INC.

THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. ___________________________________________ 6/10/2025____________ KC J. KELLER, P.L.S. 9731 DATE
EXHIBIT 2
1757
NTS OF 2 2850 Collier Canyon Road Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 245-8788 www.kierwright.com CALIFORNIA DATE BYJOB NO. KJK A22058 JUNE, 2025 SCALE SHEET SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ” 1 N SITE DRAFT EXHIBIT "B" - ANNEXATION PLAT LAFC __ - 25 TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON EXHIBIT 2
1758
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 39 ROS 185 S. MCKINLEY AVENUE SINGH AND KAUR LIVING TRUST/SINGH BALDEV/ KAUR KARAMJIT FRENCH CAMP SLOUGH UNNAMED SLOUGH FRENCH CAMP SLOUGH 1" = 200' 2 OF 2 2850 Collier Canyon Road Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 245-8788 www.kierwright.com CALIFORNIA DATE BYJOB NO. KJK A22058 JUNE, 2025 SCALE SHEET SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY EXHIBIT "B" - ANNEXATION PLAT LAFC __ - 25 TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON NORTH EXHIBIT 2
1759
Z:\2022\A22058\DOCS\SURVEY\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS\A22058-LD ANNEX CLOSURES.docx Parcel Map Check Report
Prepared by Kier & Wright
Date: 6/9/2025
Parcel Name: ANNEXATION AREA
North:12,871.9265' East:13,669.0773'
Segment# 1: Line
Course: N79°16'00"E Length: 136.00'
North: 12,897.2549' East: 13,802.6979'
Segment# 2: Line
Course: S10°44'00"E Length: 1,441.45'
North: 11,481.0237' East: 14,071.1510'
Segment# 3: Line
Course: N53°39'06"W Length: 845.17'
North: 11,981.9499' East: 13,390.4269'
Segment# 4: Line
Course: N29°16'34"W Length: 185.33'
North: 12,143.6083' East: 13,299.7971'
Segment# 5: Line
Course: N55°56'40"W Length: 221.79'
North: 12,267.8099' East: 13,116.0452'
Segment# 6: Line
Course: N2°55'39"E Length: 270.60'
North: 12,538.0567' East: 13,129.8653'
Segment# 7: Line
Course: N9°16'08"W Length: 200.22'
North: 12,735.6625' East: 13,097.6163'
Segment# 8: Line
EXHIBIT 2
1760
Z:\2022\A22058\DOCS\SURVEY\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS\A22058-LD ANNEX CLOSURES.docx Course: N61°04'00"E Length: 108.00'
North: 12,787.9120' East: 13,192.1361'
Segment# 9: Line
Course: N58°59'00"E Length: 130.95'
North: 12,855.3889' East: 13,304.3625'
Segment# 10: Line
Course: S72°27'00"E Length: 190.33'
North: 12,797.9972' East: 13,485.8335'
Segment# 11: Line
Course: N68°27'00"E Length: 98.80'
North: 12,834.2877' East: 13,577.7271'
Segment# 12: Line
Course: N67°36'00"E Length: 98.79'
North: 12,871.9337' East: 13,669.0630'
Perimeter: 3,927.42' Area: 760,455.73Sq.Ft.

Error Closure: 0.0160 Course: N63°28'34"W
Error North : 0.00712 East: -0.01427
Precision 1: 245,464.37
EXHIBIT 2
1761
C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g
A g e n d a I t e m 1 6 . 1
J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 2 5

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
& PREZONING REQUESTS FOR A

PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AT 6505 SOUTH
MCKINLEY AVENUE (APN 193-020-34)
1762

LOCATION
The Project site is
located just south of
Arch Airport Road, due
west of I-5.
6505 S McKINLEY AVE
Project
Site
1763
No current zoning. Site will be pre-zoned to Industrial, Limited (IL) zoning.

GENERAL PLAN & ZONING
Designation of Industrial, which supports Industrial land uses.

GENERAL PLAN ZONING
Project
Site
Low Density Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Open Space/Agricultural
Project
Site
Industrial, Limited (IL)
Lands in the County
Lands in the County
1764
PC Approval
Design Review Approval for
New Construction
PC Recommendations to City
Council for Annexation and
CEQA Document
3/27/25 PC Hearing
4/10/25 Approved
with Conditions of Approval
City Council Consideration
CEQA Document
Pre-Zoning of Site to IL
City Services Plan and Filing
Application for Annexation into
City
LAFCo
Consideration
LAFCo Hearing
Site is Annexed into City of
Stockton

PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS
1765

PREZONING

PROJECT SITE HAS NO CITY ZONING

PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

PC RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Proposal is for Industrial, Limited (IL) Zoning
General Plan designation is Industrial, and IL Zoning is consistent with this designation.

The PC recommended approval. With Council’s
approval, the application can be submitted to
LAFCo for annexation to Stockton
1766

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
EVALUATES IMPACTS SUCH AS:
+ Biological Resources
+ Cultural Resources
+ Geology & Soils
+ Noise, etc.

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY

PUBLIC REVIEW OF THE DOCUMENT
+ Ran from August 30, 2024, through September 29, 2024
+ 3 Public Comments received
1767

SITE PLAN
Includes:
+ 9.5 Acre Site
+ 184,166 SF Warehouse Building
+ 151 Parking Stalls (Guest & Employee)
+ 42 Truck Trailer Parking Stalls
+ Landscaping throughout
1768

BUILDING ELEVATIONS
1769

PUBLIC COMMENTS

PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
3/27/2025 Public Hearing
+ Commission spoke to adopted Warehouse Ordinance
applicability, applicability with AB 98, and additional mitigation measures
4/10/2025 Public Hearing
+ Project approved with added conditions for perimeter trees and truck idling

CEQA PROCESS

PUBLIC REVIEW OF THE DOCUMENT
+ Posted from August 30, 2024 through September 29, 2024 + 3 Public Comments received

NOTICING
Noticed in the Record and mailers – 5/15/2025
1770
Adopt an
Ordinance
Adopt a
Resolution
Adopt a
Resolution
Authorize
the City
Manager
Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project For the Pre-zoning of Assessors Parcel Number 193-020-34 to Industrial, Limited (IL)
Authorizing the filing of an annexation application with the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission
To take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the approved resolutions and ordinance

RECOMMENDATION
1771
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-0384, Version: 1
REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND PREZONING FOR A PROPOSED 217 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (MURRAY RANCH) AT 2560 HALL AVENUE (APNS 173-030-110 & 173-040-750) (P23-0346)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Find no further environmental review is necessary under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning);

2. Adopt an ordinance for the Prezoning of APNs 173-030-11 and 173-040-75 to Residential, Low (RL),

3. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the filing of an annexation application with the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the approved resolutions and ordinances.

Summary
Tim Lewis Land Group LP (Applicant) proposes to develop a single-family residential project, also known as “Murray Ranch”, on two (2) vacant parcels totaling approximately 37.4-acres, located in the vicinity south of East Charter Way and South Golden Gate Avenue (Project). The Project site is currently in unincorporated San Joaquin County and the Applicant is requesting annexation into the City of Stockton limits that currently abut the Project site. Annexation would provide the applicant with the benefit of receiving municipal sanitary sewer and sanitary storm utilities and urban services from the Stockton Fire, Police, Public Works and other Departments.

The Project application includes: a Vesting Tentative Map to subdivide the existing parcels into 217 single-family lots ranging from 3,211 to 11,165 square feet (SF) in size, and provide additional common-area lots for landscaping, stormwater basins, and open space, a Planned Development Permit, Heritage Tree Removal Permit, a Waiver and Prezoning to Residential, Low Density and authorization for Annexation.

The Development Code identifies the Planning Commission as the review authority for the requested Vesting Tentative Map, Planned Development Permit, Waiver, and Heritage Tree Removal, and is a recommending body for City Council’s consideration of the prezoning. The Planning Commission does not have decision-making authority over the annexation request, as this requires a City of Stockton Page 1 of 6 Printed on 7/10/2025
powered by Legistar™1772
File #: 25-0384, Version: 1
recommendation by the Development Review Committee.

On April 11, 2025, the Planning Commission approved the Vesting Tentative Map, Planned Development Permit, Waiver, and Heritage Tree Removal Permit, which are in compliance with the Stockton Municipal Code (SMC). The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council adopt an ordinance for prezoning of the site to Residential, Low Density (RL). Additionally, on January 21, 2025, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and recommended approval to the City Council. The Vesting Tentative Map, Planned Development Permit, Waiver, Heritage Tree removal, and prezoning, will only take effect upon City annexation.

The Project furthers General Plan policies aimed at prioritizing development of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas (Policy LU-6.2) and, Goal and Policy, HE-2: Provide a range of housing types, densities, designs, and meet existing and Projected housing needs for all economic segments of Stockton. The Project is compliant with applicable development standards within Stockton Municipal Code Title 16 (Development Code), with approval of a Waiver and Planned Development Permit request.

Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the CEQA environmental determination and prezoning of the Project site to Residential, Low Density, which is consistent with the 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designation of Low Density Residential. Further Staff and the Development Review Committee recommend authorizing the filing of an annexation application with the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo).

DISCUSSION
Background
The subject site consists of two (2) vacant parcels identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 173-030-11 and 173-040-75, which are in the general vicinity south of the intersection of East Charter Way and South Golden Gate Avenue (Attachment A - Aerial Photo). APN 173-030-11 has an address of 2560 Hall Avenue and is approximately 28.56 acres. APN 173-040-75 has an address of 2530 East Section Avenue and is approximately 8.84-acres. The overall Project site is approximately 37.4- acres.

The site is bound to the:
· North by mostly vacant land and several single-family residential homes and accessory structures in lands within the County of San Joaquin with a zoning designation of AU-20; and · South by an established low density single-family neighborhood zoned Residential, Low (RL), lands set aside for a future park zoned Open Space (OS) and vacant lands within the County of San Joaquin with a zoning designation of AU-20; and
· East by railroad tracks and vacant land within the County with a zoning designation of AU-20, and single-family homes also within the County with a zoning designation of R-L; and · West by single-family homes in the County of San Joaquin with a zoning designation of R-L.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 6 Printed on 7/10/2025
powered by Legistar™1773
File #: 25-0384, Version: 1
The General Plan Land Use designation for the entirety of the Project site is Low Density Residential (Attachment B - General Plan Land Use Map). Since the site is currently located in the jurisdiction of San Joaquin County, City of Stockton zoning has not been established. With City Council’s approval, the site will be prezoned to Residential, Low (RL) Density zoning, which is consistent with the existing General Plan designation and will take effect when the site is officially annexed into the City of Stockton. The surrounding zoning is predominantly Residential, Low Density as shown in Attachment C - Zoning Map.

Project Description
On December 14, 2023, Tim Lewis Land Group LP filed a development application for all required entitlements, including a Vesting Tentative Map, Planned Development Permit, Waiver, and Heritage Tree Removal permit, to establish a proposed residential subdivision development located at the northern terminus of Madrid Drive, which has access to Farmington Road and Juliet Road. This proposed development has been named “Murray Ranch.”
The overall Project proposes to subdivide the two (2) existing parcels into 217 single-family residential lots, as well as common area lots for a .14-acre park, .87 acres for open space and 2.06 acres for an infiltration basin to manage stormwater. The Project proposes three (3) different residential lot sizes to provide for variation in home sites; 78 lots will be approximately 45’x80’ in size, 49 lots will be approximately 50’x90’ in size, and the remaining 90 lots will be approximately 50’x95’ in size.

Access to the proposed development would entail extending public streets that were intentionally stubbed to the Project site as part of earlier approved subdivisions to connect when future surrounding development occurs. Existing streets to be extended into the Project site are proposed from the south including Brigham Street, Madrid Drive, and Daniellie Drive that are in the Stockton City limits. These streets serve existing neighborhoods and have direct connections from Juliet Road to Mariposa Road, and from Madrid Drive to Farmington Road which is a signalized intersection.

Further, Hall Avenue is currently stubbed on the western boundary of the Project site and a new connection is proposed to provide for complete circulation for the area. Hall Avenue is currently under the jurisdiction of San Joaquin County and serves an existing neighborhood (Mariposa Heights).

Planning Commission Review Authority
The Project application includes a request for a Vesting Tentative Map, which vests the right to develop the property according to the approved plan, even if regulations changes later; a Planned Development Permit which provides flexibility with their lot sizes, lot widths, and setbacks; a Waiver to enable their Project to deviate from the net density (dwelling units/per acre) requirement allowed by the Development Code for parcels with Residential, Low Density zoning; and a Heritage Tree Removal permit. The Planning Commission is the Review Authority for these requests.

STAFF ANALYSIS
To develop the project, the City Council is asked to consider approval of annexation of the Project lands into the City of Stockton and adoption an ordinance for the Prezoning of APNs 173-030-11 and 173-040-75 to Residential, Low Density (RL). Each request and staff analysis are provided below.

City of Stockton Page 3 of 6 Printed on 7/10/2025
powered by Legistar™1774
File #: 25-0384, Version: 1
Annexation
The Project site is presently located within the jurisdiction of San Joaquin County and is located within the City’s Sphere of Influence. The Applicant has requested annexation of the Project site into the City of Stockton and is shown in Attachment D - Annexation Map.

If the annexation request is approved by City Council, the City Manager will be authorized to file an annexation application with the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo).

Development Review Committee
Per SMC 16.212.050(C)(1) the Development Review Committee (DRC) is required to review the Annexation request and forward a recommendation to the Director. On January 30, 2025, the DRC reviewed the Project merits and recommended approval of the Project to the Director.

Prezoning
Since the Project site is presently located within an unincorporated area of the County of San Joaquin, annexation must occur and be preceded by “Prezoning” through a Zoning Map Amendment.

The Project, therefore, includes a request to Prezone the site to Residential, Low (RL) zoning (Attachment E - Prezoning Description and Map).

The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as Residential. Pursuant to Table 2 -1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Code) of the General Plan, the RL Zone is compatible with the General Plan Land Use designation of Residential. As reflected in the attached Proposed Ordinance, all necessary findings can be made to support the proposed Prezone action. Upon approval of the Annexation by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo), the Zoning Map Amendment would become effective and applicable.

Environmental Clearance
Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183, states that “…(P)rojects which are consistent with… general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project.”
The proposed Project is consistent with the adopted Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan and which was evaluated in its certified EIR (SCH# 2017052062). The City Council certified the 2040 General Plan EIR and adopted the 2040 General Plan on December 4, 2018. The Project is also consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies. Finally, there are no Project specific significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the Project site has no apparent value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Thus, the Project does not result in project-specific effects which are peculiar to the Project, and the Project does not require further environmental review under CEQA.

City of Stockton Page 4 of 6 Printed on 7/10/2025
powered by Legistar™1775
File #: 25-0384, Version: 1
Future Review: Design Review
SMC Section 16.120.020(A)(1) requires Design Review approval for new single-family tract development in a subdivision of (5) or more parcels, subject to the design standards located in Section 3.01 (Single-Family Design Standards for New Tract Development) of the Citywide Design Guidelines Manual.

There is no proposed architecture at this time, however the Project will need to comply with the SMC requirements and Citywide Design Guidelines. A Condition of Approval was added to the Vesting Tentative Map resolution that requires future Project architecture to go through the City’s Design Review process.

PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
On April 10, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed Project request for approval of a Vesting Tentative Map, Planned Development, Waiver, and Heritage Tree Removal, and a recommendation that the City Council approve prezoning of the site to Residential, Low Density based on recommended findings provided in the City staff report.

Many residents residing or having interest in Hall Avenue attended the Planning Commission hearing to express their concerns in opposition to the Project, specifically citing concerns with increased traffic along Hall Avenue, concerns with biological resources, tribal cultural resources, and the process by which they received notice of the Planning Commission hearing. For clarification, due to the SMC 300’ foot public hearing noticing requirement from the Project site boundary, only a small portion of the residences on Hall Avenue received a meeting notice.

After hearing public testimony from the applicant and general public, the Planning Commission voted 6-0, to approve the Vesting Tentative Map, Planned Development, Waiver, and Heritage Tree Removal requests, and a recommendation that the City Council approve Prezoning for the site to Residential, Low Density. Further, the Planning Commission’s approval included a condition that the public hearing notice for the City Council hearing be sent to all residences on Hall Avenue at a minimum 20 days prior to the meeting.

NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
In accordance with SMC 16.88.025, a neighborhood meeting was held by the Applicant on May 7, 2025, and attended by City staff and residents in the area. The purpose of the meeting was to inform nearby residents and interested parties about the development and answer any questions they may have.

The majority of those in attendance resided on, or had interest in, Hall Avenue. Many of the residents cited their concern with the Project, stating that their “neighborhood will be gone forever” and that “closing off Hall Avenue is the only solution and the only option they would entertain.” Another resident stated concerns with heavy truck traffic driving down Hall Avenue and that it would “ruin the foundation of her home.” Other attendees wanted assurances that the park would be built with the project, as the proposed City Park at the terminus of Madrid Drive was never constructed.

Another attendee stated that they wanted a traffic signal at Juliet Road and Mariposa Road.

City of Stockton Page 5 of 6 Printed on 7/10/2025
powered by Legistar™1776
File #: 25-0384, Version: 1
The Applicant has had additional dialogue with the County Supervisor’s Office, and County Public Works Department, regarding the neighborhood meeting and the concerns raised to come up with mutually beneficial solutions. The Applicant has also initiated additional correspondence with the neighbors along Hall Avenue to continue the dialogue.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The Planning Commission requested that notice for the City Council public hearing be published in The Record and mailed out to all residents within the 300’ buffer per SMC 16.88.003, as well as all owners on Hall Avenue, 20 days in advance of the City Council hearing.

The Project notice was published in The Record on June 25, 2025, and mailed notice was sent to all property owners within a 300-foot radius, as well as those owning property along Hall Avenue and Learned Avenue, 20 days prior to the City Council hearing. As of the writing of this staff report, no written comments have been submitted.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Approval of the project, and subsequent development, would provide the City’s General Fund with additional revenue collected through property taxes.

Attachment A - Location Map and Aerial Photo
Attachment B - General Plan Land Use Map
Attachment C - Zoning Map
Attachment D - Annexation Map
Attachment E - Prezoning Description and Map
City of Stockton Page 6 of 6 Printed on 7/10/2025
powered by Legistar™1777
City of Stockton, CA
Locati on Map and Aerial Photo February 27, 2025
Property Information
Property
ID
17303011-119029
Location 2560 HALL AV
Owner PELOWSKI ROBERT & PELOWKSI

BARBARA TR

MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY

NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.

Geometry updated 05/03/2023
Data updated 05/01/2023
Print map scale is approximate.

Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 522.7438213097431 ft

ATTACHMENT A
1778
City of Stockton, CA
Genera l Plan Land Use Map February 27, 2025
Property Information
Property
ID
17303011-119029
Location 2560 HALL AV
Owner PELOWSKI ROBERT & PELOWKSI

BARBARA TR

MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY

NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.

Geometry updated 05/03/2023
Data updated 05/01/2023
Print map scale is approximate.

Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 522.7438213097431 ft

ATTACHMENT B
1779
Map Theme Legends
General Plan Map
City of Stockton GIS data

ECONOMIC AND EDUCATION ENTERPRISE

RESIDENTIAL ESTATE

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

ADMINISTRATIVE-PROFESSIONAL

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

INSTITUTIONAL

OPEN SPACE/ AGRICULTURE

PARKS AND RECREATION

MIXED USE

RIGHT OF WAY

ATTACHMENT B
1780
City of Stockton, CA
Zoning Map February 27, 2025
Property Information
Property
ID
17303011-119029
Location 2560 HALL AV
Owner PELOWSKI ROBERT & PELOWKSI

BARBARA TR

MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY

NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.

Geometry updated 05/03/2023
Data updated 05/01/2023
Print map scale is approximate.

Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 522.7438213097431 ft

ATTACHMENT C
1781
Map Theme Legends
Zoning
City of Stockton, CA Zoning Data

COMMERCIAL AUTO DISTRICT (CA)

DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL (CD)

GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG)

LARGE SCALE COMMERCIAL (CL)

NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN)

OFFICE COMMERCIAL(CO)

GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(IG)

LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (IL)

PORT (PT)

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL/P)

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RM/P)

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RH/P)

MIXED USE (MX)

OPEN SPACE (OS)

PUBLIC FACILITIES (PF)

UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE (UC)

RIGHT OF WAY (ROW)

ATTACHMENT C
1782

ATTACHMENT D
1783
EXHIBIT “A”
LAFC ____________

MURRAY RANCH REORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON

Being all of Parcels One and Two as described in the Corrective Grant Deed to Douglas Glen Murray and Jean Martin Murray, Co-Trustees of the Douglas Glen Murray and Jean Martin Murray Revocable Family Trust dated December 29, 2021, recorded as Document No. 2021-216161, San Joaquin County Records, situate in a portion of the South Half of Section 45 and the North Half of Section 46 of the C.M. Weber Grant, “El Rancho del Campo de los Franceses”, being more particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Northeasterly corner of the Southpark Reorganization & Annexation No. A-86-3, recorded on January 22, 1987, as Instrument No. 87006507, San Joaquin County Records, said point being the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel One, said point being also on the Southwesterly line of the Burlington Northern & Sante Fe (BN&SF) railroad right of way (100 feet wide); thence

1. Along the Southerly line of said Parcel One, being also the existing Stockton City Limit Line, South 72°12'43" West 1338.00 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel Two, said point being also the most Northwesterly corner of the Juliet Terrace Reorganization / Annexation No. A-91-4, recorded on January 17, 1992, as Instrument No. 92006543, San Joaquin County Records; thence

2. Along the Westerly line of said Juliet Terrace Annexation, being also the Easterly line of said Parcel Two and said existing City Limit Line, South 17°40'10" East 465.78 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel Two; thence

3. Along the Northerly line of said Juliet Terrace Annexation, being also the Southerly line of said Parcel Two, and said existing City Limit Line, South 72°05'08" West 825.33 feet to the Southwesterly corner of said Parcel Two; thence

4. Leaving said existing City Limit Line and along the Westerly line of said Parcel Two, North 17°40'36" West 467.60 feet to the Southwesterly corner of said Parcel One; thence

5. Along the Westerly line of said Parcel One, North 16°56'48" West 223.25 feet; thence

6. Continuing along said Westerly line, North 67°40'33" West 364.20 feet; thence

7. Continuing along said Westerly line, North 17°27'44" West 167.11 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Parcel One; thence

8. Along the Northerly line of said Parcel One, North 72°13'27" East 1848.32 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel One, said point being also on the Southwesterly line of said BN&SF Railroad right of way; thence

9. Along the Easterly line of said Parcel One, being also said Southwesterly line of said BN&SF Railroad right of way, South 61°07'34" East 858.75 feet to the point of beginning.

Containing 37.42 Acres, more or less
SUBJECT TO all easements and/or rights-of-way of record.

This legal description as described is delineated on the accompanying “Plat to Accompany Legal Description” and made a part hereof for reference purposes.
_______________________________________
Nicole Cannella, P.L.S. 9099

ATTACHMENT D
1784

ATTACHMENT E
1785
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE STOCKTON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE “ZONING MAP,” IN SECTION 16.16.030 OF THE STOCKTON

MUNICIPAL CODE, TO PREZONE AND ZONE PROPERTIES TO RESIDENTIAL, LOW (RL) ZONING LOCATED AT APNS 173-030-110 AND 173-040-750 (APPLICATION NO. P23-0125)
On December 8, 2023, the applicant, Tim Lewis Land Group LP, submitted a request to Prezone Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 173-030-110 and 173-040-750 to Residential, Low (RL) Zoning for the purposes of future residential development. The legal parcels total approximately 37.4 acres and would be developed with single-family homes and open space; and
On March 27, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Chapter 16.88, to consider the proposed Prezoning, at which all times all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and At the March 27, 2025, public hearing, and prior to acting on this request, the Planning Commission considered and recommended approval of the Prezoning by the City Council; and
On July 15, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Chapter 16.88, to consider the proposed Prezoning, at which all times all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and At the July 15, 2025, public hearing, and prior to acting on this request, the City Council approved Prezoning of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 173-030-110 and 173-040-750; now, therefore,

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION I. FINDINGS AND INTENT
Pursuant to SMC Section 16.116.050(B)(1) and (3), Mandatory Findings of Fact for All Amendments, all of the following findings of fact, as applicable to this type of amendment, shall be made to approve an amendment:

A. The proposed Prezoning action ensures and maintains internal consistency with the general land uses, objectives, policies, programs, and actions of all elements of the General Plan on balance. The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject site Residential. Pursuant to Table 2-1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Code) of the General Plan, the RL Zone is compatible with the General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential.

B. The proposed Prezoning action would not create any inconsistencies with SMC Title 16 (Development Code) since it pertains to the Zoning Map only. The text of 1786
Title 16 (Development Code) would remain unchanged under this action.

C. The project is consistent with the 2040 General Plan Land Map designation of Low Density Residential applicable to the site. The project also furthers General Plan policies aimed at prioritizing development of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas (Policy LU-6.2). All of this is accomplished in a development proposal that is compliant with applicable development standards within SMC Title 16 (Development Code) and the proposed Planned Development Permit request.

D. The Project site is physically suitable, including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints, for the requested zoning designation and anticipated residential land use development. The Project site is surround by residential uses to the south and west, and will utilize existing roadway connection points for access to and from the site. Utilities are readily available in existing connections in the immediate vicinity.

SECTION II. PREZONING AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION
The City Council adopts this Ordinance for a Zoning Map Amendment, shown attached hereto as Exhibit 1, to Prezone of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 173-030-110 and 173-040-750, presently located in the County of San Joaquin, State of California, is hereby reclassified, upon annexation to the City of Stockton, to Residential, Low (RL) Zone.

SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days after its passage.

ADOPTED:

EFFECTIVE:

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1787
EXHIBIT 1
1788
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION WITH THE LOCAL

AGENCY FORMATIONCOMMISSION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 173-030-110 AND 173-040-750, WITH RELATED CITY SERVICES PLAN (P23- 0125)
On December 8, 2023, the applicant, Tim Lewis Land Group LP, submitted a request to Prezone Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 173-030-110 and 173-040-750 to Residential, Low (RL) Zoning for the purposes of future residential development. The legal parcels total approximately 37.4 acres and would be developed with single-family homes and open space; and
On March 27, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) chapter 16.88, to consider the proposed Prezoning, at which all times all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and At the March 27, 2025, public hearing, and prior to acting on this request, the Planning Commission considered and recommended approval of the Prezoning by the City Council; and On July 15, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) chapter 16.88, to consider the proposed Prezoning, at which all times all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and At the July 15, 2025, public hearing, and prior to acting on this request, the City Council approved Prezoning of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 173-030-110 and 173-040-750; now, therefore,

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

I. Boundary Changes/Annexations:

Pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.216.070(H)(2), the following findings of fact are made to support the annexation request:
a) The subject territory is located within the urban services area of the City, as shown in Exhibit 2: Prezone Map.
b) APNs 73-030-110 and 173-040-750 have been prezoned, as described above. c) The subject territory is contiguous to the existing City limits, as shown in Exhibit 2: Prezone Map.
d) The proposed annexation does not split a line of assessment and includes a 1789
future subdivision map application to ensure property ownership lines align with the City limit boundary established by the annexation. This finding is supported by San Joaquin County Local Formation Agency Commission Policy 10 (Definite and Certain Boundaries) which requires: (a) all boundaries shall be certain and conform to lines of assessment or ownership; and (b) acknowledgement by the City of Stockton that the Commission may impose a condition on the annexation requiring the recordation of a parcel map to avoid creating remnants of legal lots.
e) The proposal does not create islands or areas in which it would not be easy to provide City services. The subject territory includes lands located within or in immediate proximity to existing utilities. The proposal utilizes said services without creating a feature that may make their delivery difficult to other areas. f) The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject site as Low Density Residential. Pursuant to Table 2-1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Code) of the General Plan, the RL Zone is compatible with Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Map designation.

The proposed annexation would further the following General Plan policy:
 Policy LU-6.2: Prioritize development and redevelopment of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas.

Consistency of the annexation proposed with this policy is demonstrated through its ability to enable development of a new residential development on parcels that are in a vacant and contiguous location to the existing City limits.

II. Recitals
The following recitals are true and correct :

1. The proposed Project is consistent with the adopted Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan and its certified EIR (SCH# 2017052062), with City Council action taken on December 4, 2018. The Project is also consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies. Finally, there are no project-specific significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the Project site has no apparent value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.

2. The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. The Project is consistent with the General Plan density and implementing zoning as a residential project that conforms to the anticipated density and adopted development standards in the Municipal Code, with approval of a Waiver.

3. There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.

The project is not located in an area with special consideration such as overlay zoning or items particular to the site. It is vacant land adjacent to the City boundary. 1790

4. There are no project-specific impacts which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The adopted General Plan EIR analyzed the site as having a Residential land use designation, for which the proposed Project is compliant with in relation to anticipated impacts from a residential project of this size and nature.

5. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. Because the adopted General Plan EIR evaluated the site as being residentially developed in the future, any technical analysis prepared, such as air quality and traffic, etc., evaluated a residential project at this location built to the maximum potential of the site. Therefore, there are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts of said project.

6. There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. No new information has been presented which deviates from the residential development standards in the municipal code, or type of development project proposed. Therefore, no new impacts or more severe impacts are anticipated, requiring additional evaluation or an addendum to the adopted General Plan EIR.

7. The City Manager is authorized to file with the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission, as described in Exhibit 1 (City Services Plan), and Exhibit 2 (Prezone Map).

8. The San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the above-noted annexation of territory to the City of Stockton as depicted on Exhibit 2.

9. The City Manager is authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED July 15, 2025 .

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1791

ANNEXATION PLAN

FOR THE

MURRAY RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT
JUNE 10, 2025
Prepared for:

San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission
509 West Weber Avenue, Suite 420
Stockton, CA 95203
(209) 468-3198
and
City of Stockton
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Prepared by:

De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
(916) 949-3231
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
A L a n d U s e P l a n n i n g , D e s i g n , a n d E n v i r o n m e n t a l F i r m EXHIBIT 1
1792
EXHIBIT 1
1793

ANNEXATION PLAN

FOR THE

MURRAY RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT
JUNE 10, 2025
Prepared for:

San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission
509 West Weber Avenue, Suite 420
Stockton, CA 95203
(209) 468-3198
and
City of Stockton
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Prepared by:

De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
(916) 949-3231
EXHIBIT 1
1794
EXHIBIT 1
1795

TABLE OF CONTENTS TOC
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project TOC-1 Section Page Number
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 1 Annexation Plan Contents ............................................................................................................... 1 Open Space Conversion Statement................................................................................................. 3 Agricultural lands................................................................................................................ 4 Soils..................................................................................................................................... 6 Justification for Approval ................................................................................................... 6 Residential Entitlement Matrix...................................................................................................... 11 City Services Plan ........................................................................................................................... 12 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 12 Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 13 Water................................................................................................................................ 14 Stormwater....................................................................................................................... 17 Wastewater ...................................................................................................................... 21 Solid Waste ....................................................................................................................... 23 Electricity and Natural Gas ............................................................................................... 24 Police Services................................................................................................................... 24 Fire Services...................................................................................................................... 26 School Services ................................................................................................................. 27 Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................................ 28 Other Government Facilities............................................................................................. 28 Findings............................................................................................................................. 29 Timely Availability of Water Supplies............................................................................................ 29 Fair Share Housing Needs.............................................................................................................. 30 Tables Page Number
Table 1: Pipeline Projects Summary .............................................................................................. 11 Table 2: Summary Of Projected Water Supply .............................................................................. 15 Table 3: Unit Needs Based On Built And Approved Units ............................................................. 30 EXHIBIT 1
1796

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 1
MURRAY RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT –ANNEXATION PLAN

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
This Annexation Plan is designed to provide important background information to allow for a thorough justification of this annexation proposal and to ensure compliance with all San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) rules and regulations and other all applicable regulatory requirements (including the California Government Code).

The City of Stockton (City) proposes to annex 2 parcels in an unincorporated area of San Joaquin County (County), totaling 37.4 acres. The proposed Project (hereinafter “Annexation Project”) consists of a subdivision of land for the development of 217 single-family lots, four (4) open space/park lots, streets, and utilities. The entitlements requested include a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Prezone to Residential, Low (RL) with a Planned Development (PD) overlay, and annexation into the City of Stockton. The Planned Development (PD) overlay is intended to allow for flexibility in design to vary building setbacks, lot sizes, and building coverages.

The Project site is within the City of Stockton’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) but located outside the city limits and will require annexation approval by the City of Stockton and San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). The annexation request includes an amendment to the City’s 10-year planning horizon to include the Project site and is a logical extension of the City limits.

Annexation Plan Contents
This Annexation Plan includes the following sections:

OPEN SPACE CONVERSION STATEMENT
The Open Space Conversion Statement provides background on the Annexation Project, describes the existing agricultural characteristics and uses of the annexation area, provides an analysis of the agricultural and conservation-related fees that the City would be required to pay, and provides a description of the type of soils located within the annexation area. This section also discusses the Annexation Project regarding the following (pursuant California Government Code Section 56377):
a) Development or use of land other than open space uses shall be guided away from existing prime agricultural lands in open space use and towards areas containing non-prime agricultural lands, unless that action would not promote the planned orderly, efficient development of an area.
b) Development of existing vacant or non-prime agricultural land for urban uses within the existing jurisdiction of a local agency or within the SOI of a local agency should be encouraged before any proposal is approved which would allow for or lead to the development of existing open-space lands for non-open space uses which are outside of the existing jurisdiction of the local agency or outside the existing SOI of the local agency.

EXHIBIT 1
1797

ANNEXATION PLAN
2 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project

RESIDENTIAL ENTITLEMENT MATRIX
The Residential Entitlement Matrix provides a discussion of the relationship between the additional population and units proposed and the total number of units that the City has planned to accommodate, to demonstrate consistency with the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s (HCD) Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation.

CITY SERVICES PLAN
The City Services Plan has been prepared to fulfill the following requirement:
“Pursuant to California Government Code Section 56653, the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) requires that any application for a change of organization or reorganization be accompanied by a plan for providing services. In accordance with Section 56653, the plan shall include:
• an enumeration and description of services to be extended to the affected territory; • the level and range of those services;
• an indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory; • an indication of any improvements or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other conditions that the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory if the change of organization or reorganization is completed; and • information with respect to how those services will be financed.” Overall, existing public services, with improvements proposed as a part of the Murray Ranch Subdivision Project, would be adequate to serve the Annexation Project. The Murray Ranch Subdivision Project, including the Annexation Project would require extension of services provided by the City, including public safety and utility services. The level and range of these public services is described in this document and in additional detail in the Murray Ranch Subdivision Environmental Checklist. The design, engineering, and construction of these services and infrastructure improvements will be financed by the developer, subject to approval by the City of Stockton.

The San Joaquin LAFCo will rely on the environmental analysis prepared for the Annexation Project when evaluating any necessary boundary changes for the project.

TIMELY AVAILABILITY OF WATER SUPPLIES
The Timely Availability of Water Supplies section describes the availability of adequate water supplies to serve the annexation area. Eventual build out of the Murray Ranch Subdivision Project would total approximately 217 residential units on approximately 37.4 acres. The General Plan designates the Project site for residential use, and the Annexation Project is consistent with that land use designation. The City's General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) evaluated the overall capacity for development within the General Plan area, including areas served by other water purveyors such as California Water Service (CalWater). CalWater is the designated water provider for the Project area and is responsible for meeting local water demand. Based on CalWater’s existing entitlements, infrastructure, and planning documents—including its Urban Water Management EXHIBIT 1
1798

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 3
Plan—sufficient water supplies are available to serve the Murray Ranch Subdivision Project under normal, single dry, and multiple dry year conditions without requiring new or expanded water entitlements. The Annexation Project is considered planned growth and to the extent that the Annexation Project would require additional water supply, this was previously considered by the General Plan EIR. Therefore, water supplies were determined to be sufficient to serve the annexation area in a timely manner.

FAIR SHARE HOUSING NEEDS
The Fair Share Housing Needs section describes the extent to which this proposed annexation will affect the City’s ability to achieve its respective fair share of regional housing needs, as determined by the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) (consistent with Article 10.6 [starting with Section 65580] of Chapter 3). The City of Stockton has a surplus of sites available to meet its 2023- 2031 RHNA allocation by income category, as the above-moderate income RHNA allocation is satisfied by units that have been previously approved or already built.

Justification and Findings
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg (CKH) Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 is the section of the California Government Code (Section 56000 et seq.) that provides LAFCo with its authority, procedures, and functions. The CKH Act gives LAFCo power to “approve or disapprove with or without amendment, wholly, partially or conditionally” proposals concerning the formation of cities and special districts, annexation or detachment of territory to cities and special districts, and other changes in jurisdiction or organization of local government agencies.

Consistent with the requirement for LAFCo to review the proposed annexation request pursuant to the criteria provided in California Government Code Section 56337, the following justifications and findings are made in support of approval of the annexation request. 1) Lands within the annexation area are planned for urban uses in the Stockton General Plan. 2) The annexation request includes an amendment to the City’s 10-year planning horizon. 3) The Project proposes an orderly and logical boundary for annexation and is contiguous to the City limits.
4) The Project creates a logical extension of the City boundaries and can be served by existing infrastructure.

1. OPEN SPACE CONVERSION STATEMENT
The annexation area is in San Joaquin County, bounded by the limits of the City of Stockton on the south. The annexation area is located near E. Charter Way to the north, Union Pacific Railroad (U.P.R.R.) to the east, and Mariposa Road to the west. More specifically, it abuts to street stubs for Hall Avenue, Brigham Street, Madrid Drive, and Danielle Drive. The Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan Land Use Map (Figure 4) designates the entire Project site as Low Density Residential (LDR).

Lands to the east and north are designated LDR. Lands to the north, east, south, and west are designated LDR. Lands designated as Industrial (I) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) are located to the southwest and southeast, respectively. The San Joaquin County General Plan designates the annexation area as Residential Low Density (R/L).

EXHIBIT 1
1799

ANNEXATION PLAN
4 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
In reviewing to approve or deny proposals which could reasonably be expected to induce, facilitate, or lead to the conversion of existing open space lands to uses other than open space uses, the San Joaquin County LAFCo shall consider, pursuant to California Government Code Section 56377, the following:
a) Development or use of land other than open space uses shall be guided away from existing prime agricultural lands in open space use and towards areas containing non-prime agricultural lands, unless that action would not promote the planned orderly, efficient development of an area.
b) Development of existing vacant or non-prime agricultural land for urban uses within the existing jurisdiction of a local agency or within the sphere of influence of a local agency should be encouraged before any proposal is approved which would allow for or lead to the development of existing open-space lands for non-open space uses which are outside of the existing jurisdiction of the local agency or outside the existing sphere of influence of the local agency.

Agricultural Lands
The development of a 217 single-family lot residential subdivision would change the existing character of the Project site from a predominately agricultural field to a residential neighborhood.

The Project site contains areas designated as Farmland of Statewide Importance and Farmland of Local Importance and is zoned for Agriculture Urban Reserve by San Joaquin County. Most of the Project site is currently agricultural land, and is surrounded by existing development. The Project site is generally located in an area of the city that includes developed areas, residential and some undeveloped lands. The General Plan designates the Project site Low Density Residential and the Annexation Project includes a request for a pre-zone to Residential, Low Density (RL) District that supports residential development at specific densities and configurations, compatible with the areas that surround the Project site. The General Plan designates the Project site for urban land uses and the General Plan EIR already identified the Project site as an area for potential farmland conversion.

The Project site is not under a Williamson Act contract. The Annexation Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. The Annexation Project is subject to the requirements of the Stockton Agricultural Lands Mitigation Program which will involve a contribution of conservation easement-protected land or payment of in-lieu fees to the Mitigation Program as compensation for the agricultural land conversion impacts of the Project.

The City of Stockton adopted the Agricultural Land Mitigation Program in 2007. The Program applies to projects that would convert agricultural lands, as defined by the most-recent Important Farmland Maps published by the California Department of Conservation. Projects may provide “agricultural mitigation land” on a 1:1 basis for each acre of land converted, including administrative costs of approximately $1,000 per acre, or pay the established Agricultural Land Mitigation Fee of $12,822 (San Joaquin Council of Governments [SJCOG] San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan [SJMSCP] Habitat Fees, 2020) per acre. The Agricultural Land Mitigation Program provides that agricultural mitigation lands will be dedicated to a qualifying management entity such as the Central Valley Farmland Trust. The fees would be collected by the City, held in a dedicated account, and then expended by the City to acquire agricultural mitigation EXHIBIT 1
1800

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 5
land or pay for the monitoring and administrative costs of the program. The fees may also be transferred to a qualifying entity for the same purpose.

The Project applicant would be required to participate in the City’s Agricultural Lands Mitigation Program and contribute agricultural mitigation land or pay the established Agricultural Land Mitigation Fee. As such, the Project fees paid to SJCOG as administrator of the SJMSCP before issuance of a building permit, would result in the preservation of agricultural lands in perpetuity.

The purchase of conservation easements and/or deed restrictions through the City’s Agricultural Land Mitigation Program and the SJMSCP allows the agricultural landowner to retain ownership of the land and continue agricultural operations, preserving such lands in perpetuity. These properties will be developed in accordance to the City of Stockton’s adopted standards and that if any changes in land use designations within 2 years of annexation approval. The City will be required to notify LAFCo of the intended changes in land use designations.

In addition to the agricultural mitigation fee, the City has adopted Municipal Code Chapter 16.36, which establishes the City's "Right-to-Farm" ordinance. The intent of this ordinance is to protect agricultural uses in the City. Specifically, Section Municipal Code Chapter 16.36.040 establishes the City’s policy to preserve the City and County’s agricultural operations while minimizing conflicts to new urban development. The City’s "Right-to-Farm" ordinance serves to protect farmers from nuisance complaints. The ordinance requires owners and builders to notify their successors-ininterest of the potential conflicts and effects of agricultural activities, and the ordinance specifies that typical agricultural practices shall not be considered a nuisance.

In addition, prior to issuance of a City building permit for construction of a residential building, the owner of the property upon which the building is to be constructed is required to file a disclosure statement acknowledging the proximity of agricultural operations and the potential for inconvenience or nuisance associated with those uses. The disclosure statement notifies the purchaser that the property being purchased may be located close to agricultural lands and operations and that the purchaser may be subject to inconvenience or discomfort arising from the lawful and proper use of agricultural chemical and pesticides and from other agricultural activities, including, without limitation, cultivation, plowing, spraying, irrigation, pruning, harvesting, burning of agricultural waste products, protection of crops and animals from depredation, and other activities which occasionally generate dust, smoke, noise and odor.

The City of Stockton is a participant in the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP), which provides comprehensive measures for compensation and avoidance of impacts on various biological resources, including ancillary benefits to agricultural resources. For instance, many of the habitat easements that are purchased or facilitated by the SJMSCP are targeted for the protection of Swainson's hawk or other sensitive species habitat that are dependent on agricultural lands. The biological mitigation for these species through the SJMSCP includes the purchase of certain conservation easements for habitat purposes; however, the conservation easements are placed over agricultural land, such as alfalfa fields and row crops (not vines or orchards).

EXHIBIT 1
1801

ANNEXATION PLAN
6 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
Soils
There are several methods for classifying soil quality for agricultural uses. One method involves a soil capability rating provided the National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). This classification shows, in a general way, the suitability of soils for most kinds of field crops. Crops that require special management are excluded. The soils are grouped according to their limitations for field crops, the risk of damage if they are used for crops, and the way they respond to management.

The criteria used in grouping the soils do not include major and generally expensive landforming that would change slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils; nor do they include possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. In the soil capability system rating, soils are generally grouped at three levels, which are capability class, subclass, and unit. Capability classes, the broadest groups, are designated by the numbers 1 through 8. The numbers indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use.
• Class 1 soils have slight limitations that restrict their use. • Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that restrict the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices.
• Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require special conservation practices, or both.
• Class 4 soils have severe limitations that restrict the choice of plants or that require special very careful management, or both.

Based on this classification system, the entirety of Annexation Project soils falls under Class 3 (irrigated and non-irrigated).

Justification for Approval
The annexation area is planned for urban uses in the Stockton General Plan. The annexation request includes an amendment to the City’s 10-year planning horizon. Despite the impacts to agricultural land in San Joaquin County, the Project will promote planned, orderly, and efficient development.

Lastly, the Project proposes an orderly and logical boundary for annexation and is contiguous to the City limits. Consistent with the requirement that LAFCo review the proposed annexation request pursuant to the criteria provided in California Government Code Section 56337, the following justification and findings are made in support of approval of the annexation request:
1) Lands within the annexation area are planned for urban uses in the Stockton General Plan. 2) The annexation request includes an amendment to the City’s 10-year planning horizon. 3) The Project proposes an orderly and logical boundary for annexation and is contiguous to the City limits.
4) The Project creates a logical extension of the City boundaries and can be served by existing infrastructure.

EXHIBIT 1
1802

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 7
EXHIBIT 1
1803

ANNEXATION PLAN
8 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
EXHIBIT 1
1804

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 9
EXHIBIT 1
1805

ANNEXATION PLAN
10 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
EXHIBIT 1
1806

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 11

2. RESIDENTIAL ENTITLEMENT MATRIX
The City’s approach to meeting its RHNA allocation relies on pending/under application (pipeline projects), vacant sites, and anticipated development of accessory dwelling units (ADU) and junior ADUs (JADU). Using this approach, the City has a surplus of sites available to meet its 2023-2031 RHNA allocation by income category. The City currently has 17 pipeline projects, for a total of 14,388 units that can be built. Anticipated units are based on the project design as approved by the City of Stockton or as submitted by the applicant. Of the 17 pipeline projects, five are 100 percent affordable. Of the total 14,388 units, 394 are in the lower-income category, 353 are in the moderateincome category, and the remaining 13,641 are in the above moderate-income category. Table 1 provides the City’s list of pipeline projects.

TABLE 1 - PIPELINE PROJECTS SUMMARY

PIPELINE PROJECTS
TOTAL
ACRES

LOWER INCOME

CAPACITY

MODERATE INCOME

CAPACITY

ABOVE MODERATE

INCOME CAPACITY
TOTAL

CAPACITY
Calaveras Quarters Motel
Conversion 2.14 68 1 0 69
Cannery Park 291.82 0 3,267 490 522
Crystal Bay 174 0 67 1,276 1,343
Delta Cove 359.52 0 77 1,468 1,545
Elderberry Residential
Project 18.8 0 0 42 42
Grand View Village 0.79 75 0 0 75
Harding Apartments 1.02 0 4 18 22
Hunter House New
Apartments 0.69 120 0 0 120
La Passeggiata Affordable
Housing Project

0.83 94 0 0 94
Mobile Homes on El
Dorado 7.06 0 18 104 122
Sanctuary 1,950.46 0 0 5,758 5,758
Sonora Square
Apartments

0.92 37 0 37
Swain Crossing
Apartments 1.58 0 5 31 36
Tra Vigne 318.05 0 1,503 1,503
Trinity Parkway
Apartments

4.32 0 18 102 120
University Park 103.47 0 359 359
Westlake at Spanos Park 361.31 0 131 2,490 2,621
Total 3,621.10 394 353 13,641 14,374
SOURCE: CITY OF STOCKTON, 2023
The Murray Ranch Subdivision Project includes the addition of 217 new residential units to the City of Stockton. As noted previously, the Stockton General Plan EIR (the EIR) provides the Development Projections that are used in the EIR (See General Plan Draft EIR, pp. 3-20). The EIR explains that it uses a “horizon-year projection,” which is based on an estimate of the amount of development that would occur by 2040. The EIR also uses a Buildout Projection which represents full buildout of the General Plan, but with a date uncertain. Each projection is described below:

EXHIBIT 1
1807

ANNEXATION PLAN
12 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
The horizon-year projection includes the following (See General Plan Draft EIR, pp. 3-20):
• 40,900 new dwelling units, including:
o 26,300 new single-family units
o 14,600 new multi-family units
• 132,200 new residents
• 13.8 million square feet of new commercial and office space • 35.6 million square feet of new industrial space
The full buildout projection includes the following (See General Plan Draft EIR, pp. 3-22):
• 119,700 new dwelling units, including:
o 43,800 new single-family units
o 75,900 new multi-family units
• 386,700 new residents
• 50.9 million square feet of new commercial and office space • 242.4 million square feet of new industrial space
The EIR indicates that there are almost 7,000 acres of vacant land within the SOI (i.e. the EIR Study Area) (See General Plan Draft EIR, pp.3-22), which specifically includes the Annexation Project site.

The EIR indicates that a land use demand forecast (prepared as part of a Market Analysis that supports the projections for the General Plan) for Stockton in 2040 results in between 19,800 and 41,000 new housing units, including between 13,800 and 28,700 new single-family units and between 5,900 and 12,300 new multi-family units (See General Plan Draft EIR, pp. 3-24). These projections are based in part on the land use inventory from the General Plan land use map, in addition to market and economic factors that drive growth. There is nothing peculiar about the Project as it relates to house capacity/demand provided in the Horizon-Year Projection, Full Buildout Projection, or the Market Study Projections.

The current annexation area is adjacent to existing infrastructure and could serve the local demand, as well as providing the connection for other pending and entitled projects to develop subsequently.

3. CITY SERVICES PLAN
Introduction
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 56653, the San Joaquin LAFCo requires that any application for a change of organization or reorganization be accompanied by a plan for providing services. In accordance with Section 56653, the plan shall include:
• an enumeration and description of services to be extended to the affected territory; • the level and range of those services;
• an indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory; EXHIBIT 1
1808

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 13
• an indication of any improvements or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other conditions that the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory if the change of organization or reorganization is completed; and • information with respect to how those services will be financed.

This Annexation Plan has been prepared to fulfill this requirement.

Discussion
The Annexation Project consists of a subdivision of land for the development of 217 single-family lots, four (4) open space/park lots, streets, and utilities. The proposed streets are to be public, and the subdivision improvements include the extension of the water and sewer mains from adjoining properties. The layout of the subdivision allows for the preservation of 14 of the existing valley oak trees, mostly within the proposed linear park and open spaces. Forty-seven valley oak trees would be removed and would require a heritage tree permit. As the project butts up against the Union Pacific Railroad (U.P.R.R.) to the east, an 85’ building setback has been included from the outermost rail, as well as an 8’ sound wall along the project’s boundary.

The proposed development is described below.

Residential: The residential area is low-density and would consist of 217 single-family detached units on lots ranging in size from 3,600, 4,000, and 4,750 square feet. The three (3) lot sizes would be configured as follows: 1) 45’ x 80’, 2) 50’ x 90’, and 3) 50’x 95’. Given that the Project site is 37.4 gross acres, the project density would be 5.8 units per acre. This is consistent with the General Plan density limit of 6.1 units per gross acre.

Open Space/Park: The open space/park land area would consist of four (4) lots for neighborhood park and open space use. The four (4) lots include: Lot A – 2.04 acres, Lot B – 5,996 square feet, Lot C – 23,479 square feet, and Lot D - 14,251 square feet. The total area for the four (4) open space/park lots is 3.04 acres.

Street Design: The streets within the proposed residential subdivision are designed consistent with the right-of-way and curb-to-curb widths of the current City of Stockton standards. The curb and sidewalk design are also designed to match the existing surrounding neighborhoods such that the proposed subdivision becomes an extension of the existing neighborhood. This includes roll curb with monolithic sidewalks. The cul-de-sac bulbs are per the previous City standards, and are proposed to have an Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) at the end of each bulb.

Utilities: Public utilities will be constructed with the Annexation Project, including the extension of water, sewer, storm, and dry utilities. They are more thoroughly described as follows:
• Water: 8” water mains will service each lot of the subdivision, and tie into all existing stubs in the surrounding streets. Fire hydrants will be installed per City of Stockton standards. • Sewer: 8” sewer mains will service each lot of the subdivision, and tie into all existing stubs in the surrounding streets.

EXHIBIT 1
1809

ANNEXATION PLAN
14 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
• Storm: Storm mains will be installed within the subdivision to serve the project. Storm runoff will be treated by stormwater treatment devices, then conveyed into the existing 54” main that runs north to an outfall at Mormon Slough and a new proposed storm drain main. The 54” main will need to be relocated within the right of way of Brigham Street, then connect to the current alignment at the north end of the project. The existing 42” main that runs east to west through the project will be abandoned as part of the Project and will remain in place.
• Existing septic system and water well to be abandoned or destroyed per San Joaquin County standards.
• Dry utilities will be installed within 10’ Public Utility Easements (P.U.E.) along all street frontages.

The City provides a full range of municipal services, including public safety (fire, police, and building), sanitation (wastewater treatment and collection), libraries, parks, and recreation services. Municipal services would be extended to the annexation area upon development of the annexation area. The following discussion includes a description of existing City public services and utilities (including those to be extended), the level and range of these services (where applicable), when these services can feasibly be extended into the affected territory, improvements, or other conditions that the local agency would improve or require within the affected territory, information on how these services would be financed, and planned improvements.

The construction of on-site infrastructure improvements would be required to accommodate development of the Annexation Project, as described below.

Water
The Murray Ranch Project would be served by CalWater. The General Plan EIR concluded that CalWater will have sufficient water supplies to meet the projected demands from development allowed by the General Plan, and therefore has sufficient water supplies available to serve the Murray Ranch Subdivision Project from existing entitlements and resources and would not require new or expanded entitlements during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. CalWater’s water supply planning documents, including its UWMP and applicable water supply assessments, demonstrate that it has adequate supply to serve both existing customers and anticipated future development through 2040 under all hydrologic conditions.

A comparison of CalWater’s projected water supplies and demands is shown in Table 2 for Normal, Single Dry, and Multiple Dry Years, which shows that there is no supply deficit projected under hydrologic conditions through 2040.

EXHIBIT 1
1810

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 15
TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF PROJECTED WATER SUPPLY DURING HYDROLOGIC NORMAL, SINGLE-DRY, AND MULTIDRY YEARS FOR THE CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE, STOCKTON DISTRICT (AF) 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045

FIRST YEAR
TOTAL SUPPLY 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DEMAND TOTAL 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DIFFERENCE 0 0 0 0 0

SECOND YEAR
TOTAL SUPPLY 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DEMAND TOTAL 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DIFFERENCE 0 0 0 0 0

THIRD YEAR
TOTAL SUPPLY 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DEMAND TOTAL 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DIFFERENCE 0 0 0 0 0

FOURTH YEAR
TOTAL SUPPLY 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DEMAND TOTAL 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DIFFERENCE 0 0 0 0 0

FIFTH YEAR
TOTAL SUPPLY 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DEMAND TOTAL 24,776 24,627 24,589 24,521 24,564
DIFFERENCE 0 0 0 0 0
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY, STOCKTON DISTRICT 2020 UWMP, TABLE 7-4.

Based on the analysis described above, CalWater’s existing and projected potable water supplies are sufficient to meet the City’s existing and projected future potable water demands, including those future water demands associated with the Project, through year 2040, under all hydrologic conditions.

A. GROUND WATER
Cal Water's Stockton District operates 12 active and standby groundwater wells. These wells serve as a supplemental and emergency water source. The combined production capacity of these wells varies depending on operational status and regulatory constraints, but design capacities for individual wells typically range between 800 and 3,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Based on the 2020 UWMP, Cal Water's groundwater pumping capacity is approximately 23.6 million gallons per day (mgd), though actual usage is often significantly lower due to the availability and reliability of treated surface water from Stockton East Water District (SEWD)'s Dr. Joe Waidhofer Water Treatment Plant (DJWWTP).

Groundwater supplies are pumped from the Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Subbasin (DWR Basin 5-022.01), which is actively managed under a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) prepared by the Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Authority pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). Cal Water coordinates with the Authority and local agencies to support long-term basin sustainability (Eastern San Joaquin GSP, 2020).

EXHIBIT 1
1811

ANNEXATION PLAN
16 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
Groundwater wells are permitted and regulated by the California Division of Drinking Water (DDW) and must meet water quality and operational standards. Some wells are designated as standby wells and are only used during high-demand periods or emergencies. Inactive wells, those not currently permitted or functional, are excluded from capacity calculations in compliance with DDW requirements.

B.SURFACE WATER
The Cal Water Stockton District relies on a blend of surface water from SEWD and local groundwater to meet customer demand. Surface water serves as the primary source of supply for the district under normal conditions, with groundwater supplementing the system during high-demand periods, dry years, or in the event of interruptions to surface water delivery.

CalWater obtains treated surface water from SEWD, which sources water from the Mokelumne River. SEWD treats the surface water at the DJWWTP and delivers it directly to CalWater’s distribution system via dedicated transmission pipelines. Cal Water does not operate its own surface water treatment plant in the Stockton District; instead, it depends on SEWD for treated surface water deliveries. Unlike the City of Stockton’s Delta Water Supply Project, Cal Water does not currently exercise independent surface water rights from the San Joaquin River or operate an intake facility.

Due to differing pressure zones and infrastructure design, water from different supply sources is managed separately within Cal Water’s distribution system. However, Cal Water maintains interties with other agencies (including the City of Stockton) to enable emergency or supplemental deliveries when needed.

While CalWater’s system differs from the City of Stockton’s Delta Water Supply Project (which draws from the San Joaquin River and treats the water at its own Delta Water Treatment Plant), both systems rely on SEWD’s infrastructure as a major water source in the region. Through a wheeling agreement, Cal Water also conveys SEWD-treated water to the Walnut Plant service area, which is otherwise served by the City of Stockton.

CalWater monitors disinfection byproduct levels and residual chlorine concentrations throughout its system and coordinates water quality management strategies with SEWD to maintain compliance with state and federal drinking water regulations.

C. EXISTING TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
CalWater supplies a combination of locally produced groundwater and surface water purchased from the Stockton East Water District. CalWater operates 25 groundwater wells, 17 booster pumps, and 8 storage tanks to deliver approximately 22 million gallons of water daily to more than 43,000 service connections. CalWater delivers water to residential, commercial, industrial, and governmental customers. Residential customers account for most of CalWater’s service connections and 57 percent of its water uses. Non-residential water uses account for 37 percent of total demand and system water losses account for 6 percent..

EXHIBIT 1
1812

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 17
D. WATER CONSERVATION
Consistent with California Water Code Sections 11950 – 11954, the City has implemented various water conservation efforts, as well as a Water Shortage Contingency Plan which identifies actions that can be taken to respond to catastrophic interruption of water supply.

The City Council adopted a Water Conservation Ordinance in 1988, enacted in the Stockton Municipal Code, Sections 13.28 and 13.32, which include both voluntary and mandatory conservation stages. From 1990 to 1992, mandatory water reduction stages were in force due to the prolonged years of drought. The City initiated a voluntary reduction stage in 1993 and has maintained a voluntary reduction stage since that time. Cal Water supports and enforces water conservation measures in coordination with the City's policies and plans.

E. GENERAL PLAN
The City's General Plan includes policies and implementation programs related to maintaining an adequate water supply for the City's population. Following adoption of the General Plan, CalWater updated its Water Management Plan based on the growth projections of the General Plan. Based on existing water use patterns, the water supply is projected to be available through 2045. The area served would include all potential development which includes the Annexation Project location.

F. TIMING AND EXTENSION OF WATER SUPPLY TO THE ANNEXATION AREA The Development Area will construct a potable water distribution system with pipe sizes ranging from six inches to 12 inches. Stubs from the transmission pipelines will be constructed to connect to the Project potable water distribution system.

The developer's contribution to water supply as part of the Annexation Plan has been estimated based on an approximate total development impact fee of $995,379 for surface water supply. This development impact fee is allocated proportionately at a rate of $4,587. However, since this Project is located within the California Water Service area, a formal service application must be submitted.

This application will be reviewed by CalWater to prepare a comprehensive and project-specific cost estimate. Until that process is completed, the final water connection contribution remains to be determined.

Stormwater
The City provides and maintains a system of storm drains, detention basins, and pumping facilities, as well as monitoring and operational control of the storm drain system. Additionally, the City enforces storm drain regulations established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the State of California.

Urban stormwater drainage in the City is provided by a storm drain system that is separate from the municipal sewer system. COSMUD operates and maintains approximately 620 miles of pipe, 72 pump stations, and more than 100 discharge pipes. The local storm drain facilities collect and route runoff from the streets and gutters through surface canals and stormwater retention basins, as well as a through a network of underground gravity and force mains (pipelines), pump stations, and EXHIBIT 1
1813

ANNEXATION PLAN
18 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
outfalls into rivers, creeks, and the Delta, including outfalls to the San Joaquin River, Bear Creek, Pixley Slough, Mosher Slough, Five Mile Slough, Fourteen Mile Slough, Calaveras River and Stockton Diverting Canal, Smith Canal, French Camp Slough, Walker Slough, Weber Slough, North Littlejohns Creek, and Duck Creek (City of Stockton, 2018).

The City operates under Municipal Stormwater Permit Requirements Order No. R5- 2016-0040. The Stormwater Utility Division also manages the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) and all the monitoring, testing, education, and programs required under the permit.

The NPDES Stormwater Program regulates stormwater discharges from three potential sources:
• construction activities;
• industrial activities; and
• the municipal stormwater system.

A. EXISTING STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM
The City of Stockton SOI is situated just east of the Delta, a low-lying region of sloughs and channels connecting local waterways with the Suisun Bay and the San Francisco Bay. The City and surrounding areas within the SOI depend on creeks, rivers, and sloughs to collect and convey storm runoff to the San Joaquin River and the Delta. The primary watercourses that drain the SOI include the San Joaquin River, Bear Creek, Mosher Slough, Five Mile Slough, Fourteen Mile Slough, Calaveras River and Stockton Diverting Canal, Smith Canal, and French Camp and Walker Sloughs. Most storm drains and pump stations within the service area have adequate capacity to collect stormwater drainage (City of Stockton, 2020).

Stormwater runoff occurs when precipitation from rain and snow melts and does not absorb into the ground. As the runoff flows over the land or impervious surfaces (paved streets, parking lots, and building rooftops), it accumulates debris, chemicals, sediment, and other pollutants that could adversely affect water quality. Stockton’s stormwater is collected in catch basins and transported untreated directly into our local rivers, creeks, and sloughs, and eventually to the Delta. Best management practices (BMPs) are the primary method to stop contaminants from entering the system.

Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permits are required under the Clean Water Act and require the discharger to develop and implement a Storm Water Management Plan to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). The management plans specify what BMPs will be used to address certain program areas: such as public education and outreach, illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction and post-construction, and good housekeeping for municipal operations.

Each year, the City is required to provide an annual report to the State on their stormwater program and BMPs.

EXHIBIT 1
1814

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 19
B. FUTURE STORMWATER DRAINAGE DEMANDS AND SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 200-Year Flood Protection in the Central Valley
Portions of the City of Stockton lie within the 200-year flood hazard area; however, the annexation area is not located within the 200-year flood hazard area. State floodplain legislation (Senate Bill [SB] 5) for the San Joaquin River region has resulted in stricter development standards that began in early 2016. Urban areas that depend on levee protection are required to have a 200-year level of flood protection. SB 5 prohibits a city or county within the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan area from approving a development agreement, discretionary permit or entitlement, tentative map, or parcel map for any property within a flood hazard zone unless they can demonstrate any of the following:
• the project has already achieved the applicable level of flood protection, • conditions have been imposed on the project approval that will eventually result in the applicable level of flood protection, or
• adequate progress is being made towards achievement of the applicable level of flood protection.

Adequate progress is defined as meeting all the following:
• The project scope, cost and schedule have been developed; • In any given year, at least 90 percent of the revenues scheduled for that year have been appropriated and expended consistent with the schedule; • Construction of critical features is progressing as indicated by the actual expenditure of budget funds;
• The city or county has not been responsible for any significant delay in completion of the system; and
• The above information has been provided to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the Central Valley Flood Protection Board and the local flood management agency shall annually report on the efforts to complete the project.

Section 16.90.020(B) requires the review authority’s decision to approve a project in accordance with the City’s established criteria for development in 200-year floodplains, which are consistent with accepted State and federal floodplain management practices. According to the City’s established criteria, the annexation area would be considered an urban area, as it is located within the City’s corporate limits. Thus, the Annexation Project may be approved provided that all properties within the annexation area would meet the urban level of flood protection.

C. TIMING
Drainage improvements will be constructed in order to maintain the service level standard. This is accomplished by constructing the storm drainage and flood protection facilities for each new area that is developed, and by ensuring that necessary facilities are developed efficiently prior to and during construction activities.

EXHIBIT 1
1815

ANNEXATION PLAN
20 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
D.STORM DRAINAGE WITHIN THE ANNEXATION AREA
Storm mains will be installed within the subdivision to serve the Annexation Project. Storm runoff will be treated by stormwater treatment devices, then conveyed into the existing 42” and 54” main that runs north to an outfall at Mormon Slough. The 54” main will need to be relocated within the right of way of Brigham Street, then connect to the current alignment just north of the project. The existing 42” main that runs east to west through the project will be abandoned as part of the Project but will remain in place.

All drainage collection and conveyance infrastructure would be sized and constructed according to adopted City of Stockton storm drainage hydrologic and hydraulic design criteria, design standards, and specifications. Onsite stormwater runoff would be directed into an underground pipe system which would collect the runoff and direct it to the central storm drainage basin.

The Annexation Project would incorporate site design measures, landscape features, and approved engineered treatment facilities (bioretention facilities or COSMUD-approved equivalent) for water quality treatment that minimizes imperviousness, retains or detains stormwater, slows runoff rates, and reduces pollutants in post-development runoff consistent with the City of Stockton NPDES SWMP and the City of Stockton and County of San Joaquin Stormwater Quality Control Criteria Plan.

The Annexation Project would alter the existing drainage through grading and development of urban uses. Additionally, the Annexation Project would result in increased impervious surfaces and result in an incremental reduction in the amount of natural soil surfaces available for infiltration of rainfall and runoff, with the potential to generate additional runoff during storm events. Additional runoff could contribute to increased erosion, siltation, and pollution, as well as an increase in flood potential or runoff that could exceed the capacity of the City’s drainage system.

The overall design of Project’s drainage infrastructure, including the storm basin, would be required to comply with the City of Stockton NPDES Stormwater Management Plan, which includes existing and enhanced program control measures for controlling the discharge of pollutants to the municipal storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. In addition, General Plan Action SAF-3.2B requires new development to employ low impact development (LID) approaches that conserve natural areas and reduce impervious areas. The term LID means a storm water management and land development strategy that emphasizes conservation and the use of on-site natural features integrated with engineered, small-scale hydrologic controls to more closely reflect predevelopment hydrologic functions. The Annexation Project would be required to integrate LID measures to provide stormwater quality treatment. These LID measures would likely include both volume-based BMPs (i.e., bioretention, infiltration features, pervious pavement, etc.) and flow-based BMPs (i.e., vegetated swales, stormwater planter, etc.). The use of these features would be dependent upon the location and setting within the Annexation Project.

According to the City of Stockton and San Joaquin County Stormwater Quality Control Criteria Plan (SWQCCP), the Project would be considered both a Priority Project and a PLU Project, as the Project includes a residential subdivision of 10 housing units or more (Priority Project) and contains land uses with at least 10 developed dwelling units per acre (Priority Land Use [PLU] Project). Priority EXHIBIT 1
1816

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 21
projects are required to prepare and submit a Project Stormwater Quality Control Plan with the initial building permit submittal, that demonstrates the Project incorporates site design measures, landscape features, and engineered treatment facilities (typically, bioretention facilities) that will minimize imperviousness, retain or detain stormwater, slow runoff rates, and reduce pollutants in post-development runoff. In particular, the Project Stormwater Quality Control Plan would specify BMPs required to be implemented by the Project and design specifications for selected BMPs. The Project Stormwater Quality Control Plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City of Stockton Department of Municipal Utilities.

Wastewater
Wastewater services would be provided by existing and planned City of Stockton collection and treatment system. Wastewater treatment would be provided at the City’s existing Regional Wastewater Control Facility (RWCF). The RWCF provides secondary and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater throughout the City. The remainder of the City is served by on-site private septic systems or lie outside the urban service area. The existing wastewater collection system service area includes residential, commercial, industrial, municipal, and mixed-use areas within the City, as well as 17 unincorporated County areas.

A. WASTEWATER COLLECTION
Municipal wastewater treatment and collection services in the Stockton City limits are provided by COSMUD. The existing City of Stockton wastewater collection system is divided into 10 designated sub-areas or “systems.” The City’s wastewater collection system comprises of just over 1,000 miles of gravity mains ranging from four to 84 inches in diameter, as well as 35 pump stations and approximately 37 miles of active force mains ranging from two to 42 inches in diameter. The Project site is located within Collection Service Area No. 6 (City of Stockton, 2022).

Current City standards call for all gravity sewers to be designed for full-pipe gravity flow. Surcharging results in sewers that do not meet this criterion under a given flow condition. For planning purposes, the available capacity is zero in gravity sewers, with a predicted peak flow equal to or greater than the full-pipe gravity flow capacity. The following standards are used in the design of gravity sewers.

Pipes must be sloped to produce a minimum of two feet per second (fps) at peak flow. Flatter slopes (as low as 0.0006 foot per foot) have been allowed for some designs in Stockton to accommodate project-specific constraints. It can be difficult to maintain the desired grade during construction of pipelines at slopes less than 0.001 foot per foot. Initial flows during the early years will be lower than the design flows, causing velocities to be lower. During design, steeper slopes should be considered where feasible. Additional maintenance or other measures may be required to control odors in sewers with initially low velocities.

Force mains convey flow from pump stations to a downstream gravity sewer. There are approximately 158,000 lineal feet of force mains in the City’s model, representing all City-owned force mains of significant length, as well as some private pumping and force main systems. City design standards recommend that force main velocities should be limited to “around seven (7) fps” for lengths up to 300 feet, and “around five (5) fps” for lengths in excess of 1,000 feet.

EXHIBIT 1
1817

ANNEXATION PLAN
22 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
Wastewater pumping stations are located throughout the City and are integral to the wastewater collection system. Most of the pump stations discharge to pressure sewers (force mains) that convey flow under pressure either directly to the RWCF or to a downstream gravity sewer.

B. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PERMITTING AND CAPACITY
Wastewater from the City is currently treated at the City of Stockton RWCF, which is owned and operated by the City. The City’s Wastewater Master Plan Update (City of Stockton, 2022), City of Stockton Sphere of Influence Plan/Municipal Service Review, San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission Final Draft (City of Stockton, 2020), and CRWQCB Central Valley Waste Discharge Requirements for the City of Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facility are the primary documents that outline the City’s long term strategy for meeting future discharge and capacity requirements for a planning horizon that extends to build-out of the General Plan. The RWCF effluent is currently regulated by Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) Order No. R5-2020-007, NPDES CA0079138. Currently, RWCF is designed to treat and provide a discharge of up to 55 mgd of tertiary treated wastewater to the San Joaquin River, within the Delta.

RWCF collects and treats an average of 33 mgd of wastewater, from approximately 116,000 sewer connections in the City and nearby San Joaquin County areas. The City of Stockton RWCF sewer treatment plant is undergoing the Modifications Project to modernize the facility, accommodate growth through 2035 (with the ability to expand through 2045 and beyond), change the sewer treatment to an activated sludge process, and replace equipment and processes that are beyond their useful life. Modifications to the RWCF are required to maintain compliance with the RWCF NPDES permit, extend the useful life of existing facilities, improve working conditions for facility staff, and implement components of the City’s Capital Improvement and Energy Management Plan.

The City initiated the RWCF Modifications Project to (1) increase the reliability of the liquid and solids treatment processes, (2) improve reliability in treating existing and projected flows, (3) reduce energy costs and provide reliable renewable energy alternatives, and (4) reduce nitrate plus nitrite concentrations in the final effluent to comply with the RWCF NPDES permit. All existing and planned development areas and the unincorporated islands are expected to be served by the RWCF under the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan buildout development conditions, regardless of water source, as a prudent planning assumption for the purposes of the City’s Wastewater Master Plan Update (City of Stockton, 2023).

C. WASTEWATER QUALITY
The City’s wastewater treatment plant is governed by a federal NPDES permit. The City is required by law to have its permit reviewed every five years by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (the State’s regulating agency for the NPDES permit program). On February 20, 2020, the Central Valley CVRWQCB issued a wastewater discharge permit to the City of Stockton for the operation of its regional wastewater treatment facility.

D. WASTEWATER SYSTEM WITHIN THE MURRAY RANCH ANNEXATION AREA 8” sewer mains will service each lot of the subdivision, and tie into all existing stubs in the surrounding streets. Effluent from all tributary areas would be collected and conveyed through EXHIBIT 1
1818

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 23
gravity sewer pipelines. All sewer collection and conveyance infrastructure would be sized and constructed according to adopted City of Stockton sewer hydrologic and hydraulic design criteria, design standards, and specifications.

City’s wastewater treatment facility is approaching its functional capacity, and expansion of RWCF to meet anticipated demands resulting from growth in Stockton is the subject of an ongoing planning and engineering effort. RWCF has adequate capacity to serve anticipated short-term development within the City, and expansion plans provide for creation of additional capacity over time to meet anticipated demands generated from the annexation area and other growth areas of the City.

Occupancy of the Murray Ranch Subdivision Project would be prohibited without sewer allocation, as required by Stockton Municipal Code Section 13.12.100, Mandatory Sanitary Service Required.

An issuance of sewer allocation from the City’s available capacity would ensure that there would be a final determination by the wastewater treatment and/or collection provider that there is adequate capacity to serve the Annexation Project’s projected demand, in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. Additionally, any planned expansion to the RWCF with a subsequent allocation of capacity to the Annexation Project would ensure that there would not be a determination by the wastewater treatment and/or collection provider that there is inadequate capacity to serve the Annexation Project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

The developer's contribution to sewer connection as part of the Annexation Plan has been estimated based on an approximate total development impact fee of $651,000 sewer connection. This development impact fee is allocated proportionately at a rate of $3,000 per residential unit.

Solid Waste
The City of Stockton Public Works Department (Solid Waste & Recycling Division) provides solid waste hauling service for the City and would serve the Annexation Project. Waste collection services are provided weekly, as specified by the waste haulers that serve the City, which include Republic Services and Waste Management.

Solid waste from Stockton is taken to Forward Landfill in Manteca or the North County Landfill in Lodi. During inclement weather, occasional loads are taken to the Lovelace Material Recovery Facility in Manteca. Solid waste from Lovelace is disposed at Foothill Landfill in Linden. Construction and demolition materials and some commercial loads are processed at the East Stockton Transfer Station. Residuals from the East Stockton Transfer Station are disposed at Forward Landfill.

The permitted daily maximum disposal at the Forward Landfill is 8,668 tons per day. The total permitted capacity of the Forward Landfill is 59.16 million cubic yards, which was expected to accommodate an operational life until January 1, 2036. The remaining capacity of Forward Landfill is 24.7 million cubic yards.

The permitted daily maximum disposal at the Foothill Landfill is 1,500 tons per day. The remaining capacity is 125,000,000 cubic yards with an anticipated closure year of 2082. The permitted daily maximum disposal at the North County Landfill is 825 tons per day. The remaining capacity is 35,400,000 cubic yards with an anticipated closure year of 2048.

EXHIBIT 1
1819

ANNEXATION PLAN
24 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
The Annexation Project would not generate significant or abnormal volumes of solid waste. Because the General Plan EIR determined that solid waste capacity is adequate to serve the demand resulting from General Plan build-out and the Annexation Project’s use is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the Project site. Should additional solid waste disposal needs become necessary, there would be available capacity at both Foothill Landfill and North County Landfill to accommodate the additional waste generated. Solid waste collection services would continue to be made available to new residents, owners, and tenants of the Project as units begin to become occupied.

The developer's contribution to sanitary connection as part of the Annexation Plan has been estimated based on an approximate total development impact fee of $455,700 for combined fees.

This development impact fee is allocated proportionately at a rate of $2,100 per residential unit.

Electricity and Natural Gas
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is responsible for provision of electricity and natural gas to the City and the annexation area. PG&E delivers approximately 86,179 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity to its 15 million customers throughout the 70,000-square-mile service area in northern and central California. The PG&E service area is divided into seven distribution areas, with Stockton located in the Stockton Division of PG&E's Operations, Maintenance, and Construction Area 5.

PG&E is also responsible for the provision of natural gas to the City. Gas is delivered to the City and the City Planning Area through portions of PG&E's 48,198 miles of natural gas pipelines. Residents, owners, and/or tenants would be responsible for paying for electricity and natural gas services, based on the amount of energy used.

Police Services
Law enforcement services for the City of Stockton are provided by the Stockton Police Department (SPD). The SPD service area covers over 65 square miles. The average response time to in-progress life threatening emergencies is between three and five minutes. Depending on the nature of the call, the time of day, the location, and the number of on-duty personnel, response times to nonemergency calls can exceed 25 minutes. SPD serves the area to the City limits, while the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department serves all adjacent unincorporated areas within the Stockton SOI (City of Stockton, 2020). Through a mutual aid agreement, SPD and the County Sheriff’s Department can call upon each other to provide service when requested.

SPD consists of 485 sworn police officers and 227 civilian staff. Stockton’s 2019 population was approximately 316,400, which resulted in a ratio of 1.533 sworn staff per 1,000 residents (City of Stockton, 2020). This ratio exceeds the City’s General Plan Safety Element minimum standard of 1.5 sworn officers per 1,000 residents.1 Although the Stockton General Plan states that the City strives to achieve a ratio of 1.5 sworn officers per 1,000 population, staffing levels in the City of Stockton ultimately are determined each year by the City Council in consultation with the City Manager and Chief of Police based on the needs of the City. Additional officers are planned to be hired, as the City 1 City of Stockton General Plan, Public Facilities and Services Element, PFS-7.2.

EXHIBIT 1
1820

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 25
population grows. The City’s goal is to respond to all priority one emergency calls within an average of five minutes or less.

SPD is organized into two bureaus, Logistics and Operations, and five divisions, including Administrative Services, Field Operations Investigations, Special Operations, and Technical Services.

Divisions are coordinated out of two facilities: the Headquarters, located at 22 E. Weber Avenue, and Operations, located at 22 E. Market Street (City of Stockton, 2020).

The SPD management team consists of the Chief of Police, who oversees Professional Standards, Fiscal Affairs and Planning, and Public Information Sections, an Assistant Chief of Police (currently vacant), and two Deputy Chiefs of Police, each overseeing a bureau, and five Police Captains, each overseeing a division (City of Stockton, 2020).

SPD has both traditional and specialized transportation equipment that it uses to conduct patrols, respond to emergencies, and provide programs. The transportation types include bicycles (16 units), marked vehicles (217 units), unmarked vehicles (208 units), motorcycles (27 units), animal control (8 units), and miscellaneous (9 units) (City of Stockton, 2020).

The City of Stockton General Plan includes policies and actions to ensure that SPD continues to provide adequate facilities and staffing levels. Below is a list of relevant policies and actions:
• Carefully plan for future development and proactively mitigate potential impacts (Policy LU-6.1).
• Maintain adequate staffing levels to support achieving the City’s service level goals for police and fire protection (Action LU-6.1.G).
• Ensure that all neighborhoods have access to well-maintained public facilities and utilities that meet community service needs (Policy LU-6.3). • Require development to mitigate any impacts to existing sewer, water, stormwater, street, fire station, park, or library infrastructure that would reduce service levels (Action LU-6.3.A).

The Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget for SPD is $16,453,310. The need for additional personnel in the future will be addressed by the Chief of Police, the City Manager, and the City Council as response times are reassessed annually and as budget allows. The budget for SPD is expected to increase, as development of the City of Stockton continues. Development of the area to be added to the 10-year planning horizon as part of the annexation to the SOI would provide additional revenues to SPD.

SPD has sufficient resources to serve the annexation area. Staffing levels at the SPD are adjusted based on Police Department response times and new hiring is expected to occur as the population of Stockton grows. Additional revenue would be provided directly to SPD, through the payment of development fees, by the applicants of the Murray Ranch Subdivision Project. Furthermore, the proposed developments would be more easily accessible by improved road infrastructure that would be developed in the future. This extension of services would occur concurrently with the development of the annexation area.

EXHIBIT 1
1821

ANNEXATION PLAN
26 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
The developer's contribution to police services as part of the Annexation Plan has been estimated based on an approximate total development impact fee of $128,247. This development impact fee is allocated proportionately at a rate of $591 per residential unit.

Fire Services
The Stockton Fire Department (SFD) is responsible for the primary provision of fire services and emergency medical response for the City and its residents, including the surrounding unincorporated areas. SFD provides service to a 91-square-mile area, serving a population of approximately 336,000 people within the City and the County’s Boggs Tract, Lincoln, Eastside, and Tuxedo-Country Club Fire Protection Districts. SFD is comprised of 187 sworn fire personnel and 46 civilian personnel (City of Stockton, 2023).

SFD consists of six operational divisions: Administration, Operations, Fire Prevention, Training, Communications/Dispatch, and Emergency Medical Services. SFD is led by a Fire Chief, who reports to the City Manager's Office (City of Stockton, 2022A). Each division is managed by a Deputy Chief or Division Chief (City of Stockton, 2022B).

SFD has 13 fire stations located throughout the City, with daily staffing levels of three-person fire engine companies, (4) four-person truck companies, two battalion chiefs and one chief’s operator (City of Stockton, 2023). In addition, SFD has access to 7,000 hydrants in key locations providing adequate water for the surrounding areas (City of Stockton, 2020). Each fire station has one fire engine, and the truck companies are located at SFD Stations 2, 3, and 4, and 7. The Training Division and Communications Division are located at Station 2, the central fire station. The Hazardous Material Team is staffed by Station 3, and Urban Search and Rescue Team is staffed by Station 2 (City of Stockton, 2022B). The annexation area is expected to be served primarily by Station 12, which is located approximately 0.65 miles northeast of the annexation area.

The City of Stockton provides contractual fire services to the County’s Boggs, Tract Eastside, Lincoln, and Tuxedo-Country Club Fire Protection Districts. These districts cover unincorporated areas in Stockton’s SOI, and Boggs tract and Country Club are entirely within Stockton’s SOI. These districts pay for services based on the proportion of the cost for fire services, as calculated by the ratio of assessed property value in the districts to the total assessed property value in the City (City of Stockton, 2020). In addition, SFD also provides emergency response services within the City limits and to the four adjoining County fire districts (Boggs, Tract, Tuxedo-Country Club, Eastside, and Lincoln Fire Protections Districts). In 2022, SFD received approximately 68,000 calls for services and responded to 44,665 emergency incidents, including 17,935 EMS emergencies and 4,658 fire incidents(City of Stockton, 2023). The Project site is located within the Eastside Rural Fire Protection District, which provides fire service to several unincorporated islands east and adjacent to the City of Stockton. The total service area of the District is approximately 7,451 acres (San Joaquin County LAFCO, 2023).

The Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification Program currently rates the Fire Department as 2 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the highest possible protection rating and 10 being the lowest. The ISO rating measures individual fire protection agencies against a Fire EXHIBIT 1
1822

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 27
Suppression Rating Schedule, which includes such criteria as facilities and support for handling and dispatching fire alarms, first-alarm response and initial attack, and adequacy of local water supply for fire-suppression purposes. As of 2019, the Stockton Fire Department ISO rating is a level 2 (City of Stockton, 2020).

The City of Stockton General Plan includes policies and actions to ensure that the SFD continues to provide adequate facilities and staffing levels. Below is a list of relevant policies and actions:
• Carefully plan for future development and proactively mitigate potential impacts (Policy LU-6.1).
• Monitor the rate of growth to ensure that it does not overburden the City’s infrastructure and services and does not exceed the amounts analyzed in the General Plan EIR (Action LU-6.1.B).
• Maintain adequate staffing levels to support achieving the City’s service level goals for police and fire protection (Action LU-6.1.G).
• Ensure that all neighborhoods have access to well-maintained public facilities and utilities that meet community service needs (Policy LU-6.3). • Require development to mitigate any impacts to existing sewer, water, stormwater, street, fire station, park, or library infrastructure that would reduce service levels (Action LU-6.3.A).

The average response time for all types of calls between the years 2015 and 2016 (the most recent data available), was five (5) minutes and 47 seconds.

The FY 2024-2025 budget for the SFD is $24,126,011. The need for additional firefighters in the future will be addressed as warranted. Development of the Annexation Project would provide additional revenues to the SFD, which would help to ensure that adequate fire service is extended to the annexation area.

The developer's contribution to fire services as part of the Annexation Plan has been estimated based on an approximate total development impact fee of $169,477. This development impact fee is allocated proportionately at a rate of $781 per residential unit.

School Services
The annexation area is located within the boundaries of the Stockton Unified School District (SUSD).

The development impact fee is the source of school capital improvement funding provided by new development. The SUSD is eligible to levy Level II and III development impact fees on new residential and commercial development. Development impact fees for SUSD are $5.04 per square foot of residential development. The Annexation Project includes the development of 217 additional housing units. The number of students generated by the proposed residential would be consistent with the levels assumed in General Plan EIR as the Annexation Project is consistent with General Plan’s land use assumptions for the Project site.

EXHIBIT 1
1823

ANNEXATION PLAN
28 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project
The SUSD serves 33,000 K-12 students in Stockton (2023-2024 school year). The SUSD operates 56 school sites, including 41 K-8 schools, four comprehensive high schools, three small high schools, one alternate high school, one special education school, and 5 dependent charter schools. With the payment of school fees to the applicable school districts, timely extension of school services to the annexation area is expected.

The developer's contribution to the school services as part of the Annexation Plan has been estimated based on an approximate total development impact fee of $2,493,491. This development impact fee is allocated proportionately at a rate of $11,491 per residential unit.

Parks and Recreation
Under the park standards outlined in the City’s General Plan, the City aims to provide 2 acres of neighborhood parkland, 3 acres of community parkland, and 3 acres of regional parkland per 1,000 residents. With the existing population of 319,731 residents, the City is currently deficient in meeting its park service standards in all categories. The General Plan has established a parkland standard of 2 acres of neighborhood parkland, 3 acres of community parkland, and 3 acres of regional parkland per 1,000 residents. Based on the 679 new residents, the proposed Project would require 1.358 acres of neighborhood park, 2.037 acres of community park, and 2.037acres of regional park.

The proposed project includes 4 separate lots dedicated to open space and recreation. Lot A is a

2.04 acres linear park that contains numerous valley oaks trees and aquatic/drainage habitat. This area is intended to be left intact and serve as passive open space and recreation. Lot B is a 0.138- acre park space that is intended to be attached to a larger park that was approved with a separate subdivision to the south of the park. Lot C is a 0.539-acre open space lot that is intended to be passive open space. Lot D is a 0.327-acre open space lot that is intended to be passive open space.

Amenities that may be included within the 4 park/open space lots include linear paths, benches, tot lot, and shade structures. The exact design and amenities of these four lots will be determined through the improvement design process with the City of Stockton. The design process will also determine what proportion of the lots is eligible for park credit.

The Annexation Project would be subject to Municipal Code, Section 16.72.060(C), Park Land Dedications and Fees, which required for the dedication of land and/or the payment of fees to the City for park and recreational purposes and/or the construction of park and recreational facilities.

The developer's contribution to the Parks and Recreation fee as part of the Annexation Plan has been estimated based on an approximate total development impact fee of $607,166. This development impact fee is allocated proportionately at a rate of $2,798 per residential unit.

Other Government Facilities
The Project would be subject to Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.72.260, Public Facilities Fee (PFF), which requires payment of a PFF fee on issuance of building permits for development in the City to pay for municipally owned facilities, including but not limited to City office space, libraries, and community recreation centers. Payment of the fee is required to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to mitigate the impacts caused by future development in the City.

EXHIBIT 1
1824

ANNEXATION PLAN
City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project 29
The payment of fees has been identified to finance public facilities and/or compensation measures, and to pay for each development’s fair share of the construction costs of these improvements, and/or the costs of the compensation measures. For the Annexation Project, the project total fees due at the time of building permit issuance, including the impact fees identified previously for water, sewer, solid waste, police, fire, schools, and parks is $12,129,444, which equates to an average of $55,896 per unit.

Findings
Overall, existing public services, with improvements proposed as a part of the Project, would be adequate to serve the Project and its future residents. The Annexation Project would require the extension of services provided by the City, including public safety and utility services. The level and range of these public services is described in this document and in additional detail in the Murray Ranch Subdivision Project Environmental Checklist. The design, engineering, and construction of these services and infrastructure improvements will be financed by the developer subject to approval by the City of Stockton.

4. TIMELY AVAILABILITY OF WATER SUPPLIES
The Annexation Project includes a total area of 37.4 acres that is intended for the development of up to 217 residential units and 4 separate lots dedicated to open space and storm drain treatment.

The construction of the Annexation Project would increase water demand on-site. Water service for the Annexation Project will be provided by CalWater. CalWater’s UWMP for outlines the available water supply and projected demands through the year 2045, including under normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry year scenarios. According to the UWMP, CalWater receives its water supply from both surface water (primarily from SEWD) and groundwater extracted from the Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Subbasin. The UWMP demonstrates that CalWater District has sufficient water supplies to meet projected future demands for its service area under all hydrologic conditions, including during extended drought periods.

The General Plan designates the Project site for Residential use and the Annexation Project is consistent with that land use designation. Furthermore, the General Plan EIR concluded that CalWater will have sufficient water supplies to meet the projected demands from development allowed by the General Plan, and therefore has sufficient water supplies available to serve the Annexation Project from existing entitlements and resources, and would not require new or expanded entitlements during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. The Annexation Project is considered planned growth and to the extent that the Annexation Project would require additional water supply.

As identified above, the Annexation Project would not result in insufficient water supply availability to serve the Project from existing entitlements and resources.

EXHIBIT 1
1825

ANNEXATION PLAN
30 City of Stockton – Murray Ranch Subdivision Project

5. FAIR SHARE HOUSING NEEDS
The extent to which the proposal would affect the City in achieving its respective fair share of regional housing needs, as determined by the SJCOG consistent with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3, Division 1 of Title 7 is provided below.

The annexation area is currently under San Joaquin County jurisdiction and is not subject to the City of Stockton's Housing Element. The San Joaquin County General Plan currently designates the annexation area for Low Density Residential (R/L). The annexation request includes an amendment to the City’s 10-year planning horizon. and is planned in the City of Stockton General Plan for Low Density Residential (maximum density is 6.1 dwelling units per acre [du/ac]). Additionally, the San Joaquin County Zoning Ordinance currently designates the annexation area for AU-20 (AgricultureUrban Reserve, 20 Acres).

It is expected that the units built as part of the Murray Ranch Subdivision Project will be developed at market rate and would therefore be included within the above moderate and/or moderateincome categories (as defined by RHNA).

Table 3 shows the City's remaining RHNA allocation based on income category and the need which has already been satisfied during the Housing Element period (i.e., January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2031) by already built and approved units. To ensure that the City has sufficient capacity to accommodate the RHNA allocation throughout the planning period, HCD recommends in its “Housing Element Site Inventory Guidebook” (Government Code Section 65583.2) that the City create a buffer in the sites inventory of 15 to 30 percent more capacity than required, especially for capacity to accommodate the lower-income RHNA allocation. As shown in Table 3, the City has taken this approach and assumed a 30 percent buffer across all income categories.

TABLE 3 – UNIT NEEDS BASED ON BUILT AND APPROVED UNITS (JAN. 1, 2023 – DEC. 31, 2031)

INCOME CATEGORY RHNA
RHNA
WITH
30%

CUSHION

PIPELINE PROJECTS
VACANT
SITES
TOTAL

CAPACITY

SURPLUS
UNITS

SURPLUS
OF
RHNA
WITH
30%

CUSHION
Extremely Low 1,232 1,602 131 1,543 1,674 442 72
Very Low 1,233 1,603 186 1,544 1,730 497 127
Low 1,548 2,012 77 1,544 1,729 181 (283)
Moderate 2,572 3,344 353 3,112 3,519 947 175
Above Moderate 6,088 7,914 13,641 124 13,783 7,695 5,869 Total 12,673 16,475 14,388 7,867 22,435 9,762 5,960
SOURCE: CITY OF STOCKTON, 2023.

As shown in Table 3, the City has a surplus of sites available to meet its 2023-2031 RHNA allocation by income category. The current Stockton Housing Element, adopted by the City Council and reviewed and approved by HCD, has identified residential land inventory within the Land Use Element of the General Plan to meet the RHNA allocation for the current period.

EXHIBIT 1
1826
EXHIBIT 2
1827

REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND PREZONING
FOR A PROPOSED 217 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT
2560 HALL AVENUE (P23-0346)
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item 16.2
July 15, 2025
1828

LOCATION
The Project site is located south of E. Charter Way and North/East of Mariposa Road. 2560 Hall Avenue
Project
Site
1829
No current zoning. Site will be pre-zoned to Residential, Low Density (RL) zoning.

GENERAL PLAN & ZONING
Designation of Residential, which supports residential land uses. GENERAL PLAN ZONING Project
Site
Low Density Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Project
Lands in the County Site
Lands in the County
1830
PC Approval
CEQA Determination
Vesting Tentative Map
Planned Development
Permit
Waiver & Heritage Tree
Removal
PC Recommendation to
CC for Pre-zoning
City Council
Consideration
CEQA Determination
Pre-zoning of Site to
Residential Low Density
(RL)
Approval of a City
Services Plan
Filing of Application to
LAFCo
LAFCo
Consideration
LAFCo Hearing
Site is Annexed into City
of Stockton

PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS
1831

PREZONING

PROJECT SITE HAS NO CITY ZONING

PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

PC RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Proposal is for Residential, Low Density (RL) Zoning
General Plan designation is Low Density Residential, and RL Zoning is consistent with this designation.

The PC recommended approval. With Council’s approval, the application can be submitted to LAFCo for annexation to Stockton 1832

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
CEQA Section 15183 – Consistent with General Plan EIR
Can be used when projects are:• Consistent with the current General Plan Policies• Consistent with certified General Plan EIR • Technical studies still prepared to evaluate traffic, biology, etc.• No “Project Specific” significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
1833
SITE PLAN Includes:
+ 37.4 Acre Site+ 217 units + 3 lots sizes (45x80, 50x90, 50x95)+ Landscaping and park spaces 1834

PUBLIC COMMENTS
5/7/2025 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING• Mostly attended by neighbors from Hall Avenue and City staff• Concerns raised about loss of neighborhood feel, heavy truck traffic during construction, wanting assurances park would be built in the project 4/10/2025 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
• Hall Avenue residents expressed concerns in opposition citing traffic, biological resources, and noticing process
• Planning Commission Approved recommendation to City Council (6-0 unanimous vote)
NOTICINGNoticed in the Record and mailers – 6/25/2025
1835
Adopt an
Ordinance
FindAdopt a Resolution
Authorize the City Manager
No further environmental review is necessaryFor the Pre-zoning of APNs 173-030-11 and 173-040-75 toResidential, Low (RL)Authorizing the filing of an annexation application with the SanJoaquin Local Agency Formation CommissionTo take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out thepurpose and intent of the approved resolutions and ordinance.

RECOMMENDATION
1836

City Council and Concurrent AuthoritiesJuly 15, 2025

City Council and Concurrent Authorities
July 15, 2025