EXHIBIT 1
526
EXHIBIT A
SUMMARY OF FEES AND BONDS
.. SIRE ET- NAMESIGt,.LEEE ... ., .... ., .................... .,, ........ ,., ................. $3,148."i'5- PLAN CHECK FEE ... ... ... ..... ....................................................... $73,887.28 INSPECTION FEE ......... ... ......................................................... $111,193.94 MATERIAL TESTING FEE ... ............................................. ............ $12,278.32 FILING FEE ... ...... ... ... .... .. ... ......................................................... $3,685.00 TECH FEE ...... ............... ... ... .................. ................................... $14,157.47 CRS FEE ... ... ... ... ...... ........... ..................................................... $11,325.97 CASH DEPOSIT ............................................................................ $31,613.00 COMPUTER MAPPING FEE ...... ... ................................................... $597.00 MUD IMAGING FEE ... ... ...... ........ .................................................... $552.00 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SEGREGATION ........................................... $0.00 TOTAL ....... $262,438.73
RECORDING FEE (payable to San Joaquin County Recorder)
MAP (8 Sheets) ....................................................................... $116.00 AGREEMENT (51 Sheets) ...................................................... $239.00 TOTAL ............. $355.00
BONDS
MONUMENT BOND ........................................................... $52,000.00 PERFORMANCE BOND ............................................... $1,580,670.00 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND ................................... $1,580,670.00 STREET TREE BOND ... .................................................... $41,437.50 TOTAL .... $3,254,777.50
13 EXHIBIT 1 527
SUMMARY OF FEES AND BONDS (CONT.)
PROPORTIONATE SHARES
.. _nRADE.SEeARAIIQN ALUeRR(SE'RR).AND_
EIGHT MILE ROAD ............................................................................................ PFF EIGHT MILE ROAD/HAM LANE .............................. ....................................... $4,427.68 EIGHT MILE ROAD/LEACH ROAD ................................................................ $4,427.68 EIGHT MILE ROAD/HWY 99 WEST
FRONTAGE ROAD ................................. ........................................................ $9,158.62 EIGHT MILE ROAD/HWY 99 EAST
FRONTAGE ROAD ..................................................... ....................................... $882.78 EIGHT MILE ROAD/HWY 99 EAST FRONTAGE
ROAD AT NORTHBOUND RAMP ............................ ...................................... $2,234.43 MORADA LANE/HWY 99 WEST FRONTAGE
ROAD .............................................................................................................. $2,714.22 MORADA LANE/HWY 99 EAST FRONTAGE
ROAD ........................................ ............................. ......................................... $3,541.91 PARK AND RIDE FACILITIES (686-0000-237.67-38) .................................. $51,000.00 STREET MICROSURFACING (686-0000-237.67-40) .................................. $65,072.44 TOTAL $143,459.76
14 EXHIBIT 1
528
Exhibit B:
Insurance Requirements
(Subdividers)
. Contractor shall procure an�d maintain for the duration of the contract insuranc�c1.ga.irn,t claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by tne Confractor, nls agents, representatives, employees or subcorifraci:ors.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall b.e twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Surety Requirement: as described below.
If the Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Stockton requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Stockton.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
15 EXHIBIT 1 529
Additional Insured Status
The City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability • coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or If not available, through the addition ofl>otll CG 2010; CG2026, CG 2033, of CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 ifa lafe(editioil is used). Additional insured Name of Organization shall read "City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers." Policy shall cover City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for all locations work is done under this contract.
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. The City of Stockton does not accept endorsements limiting the Contractor's insurance coverage to the sole negligence of the Named Insured.
Umbrella or Excess Policy
The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true "following form" or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Contractor's primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City of Stockton.
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City of Stockton a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Stockton by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this 16 EXHIBIT 1
530
provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Stockton has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to ancL�pproved by the City of Stockton. The City of Stockton may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expefr,seswithiri
f
he retentforl.fhepolicy language shall provide, or be
endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Stockton. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City of Stockton. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City of Stockton may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Contractor to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City of Stockton reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Stockton.
Claims Made Policies {Professional & Pollution only}
If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
2. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five. {5} years after completion of the contract of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five {5} years after completion of work.
17 EXHIBIT 1
531
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City of Stockton with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL ctnd any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City of Stockton before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor's obligation to provide them. The City of Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Surety Requirement
Contractor shall provide the following Surety Bonds:
1. Performance Bond
2. Payment Bond
3. Cash Deposit
The Payment Bond and the Performance Bond shall be in a sum based on the engineer's cost estimate. Bonds shall be duly executed by a responsible corporate surety, authorized to issue such bonds in the State of California and secured through an authorized agent with an office in California.
Cash deposit of one (1) percent of the construction cost or a minimum of $5,000.00, whichever is greater.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these
requirements, including limits, based
on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Certificate Holder Address
The address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be:
City of Stockton
Its Officers, Officials, Employees, and Volunteers
400 E Main St, 3rd Floor - HR
Stockton, CA 95202
18 EXHIBIT 1 532
Exhibit C:
Insurance Requirements
( Construction Contracts)
. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, and for five (�L years thereafter, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunderoyThetont:rador, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $3,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering Code 1 (any auto), with limits no less than $3,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employers' Liability insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Professional Liability (if Design/Build), with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate.
S. Contractors' Pollution Legal Liability and/or Asbestos Legal Liability and/or Errors and Omissions (if project involves environmental hazards) with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate.
6. Surety Bonds as described below.
If the contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Stockton requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor.
Any available insurance
proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Stockton.
19 EXHIBIT 1 533
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Stockton. The City of Stockton may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the namedlnsured of City ofSfocl<.ton. TneCGL-and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City of Stockton. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City of Stockton may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Contractor to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named Insured. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City of Stockton reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1. The City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by or on behalf of the Contractor.
General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
Additional insured Name of Organization shall read "City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers." Policy shall cover City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for all locations work is done under this contract.
2. For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. The City of Stockton does not accept endorsements limiting the Contractor's insurance coverage to the sole negligence of the Named Insured. 20 EXHIBIT 1
534
3. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall provide that coverage shall not - be canceled, except with notice to the City of Stockton.
Claims Made Policies (Professional & Pollution only)
_If __ a_11y coverage required is written on a claims-madecoverc1ge_form: __
1. The retroactive date must be shown, and this date must be before the execution date of the confrac:t orffieoeginnirig of contract work. --
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of contract work.
3. If coverage is cancelled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims- made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective, or start of work
date, the Contractor must purchase extended reporting period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.
4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City of Stockton for review.
5. If the services involve lead-based paint or asbestos identification/remediation, the Contractors Pollution Liability policy shall not contain lead-based paint or asbestos exclusions. If the services involve mold identification/remediation, the Contractors Pollution Liability policy shall not contain a mold exclusion, and the definition of Pollution shall include microbial matter, including mold.
Umbrella or Excess Policies
The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true "following form" or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Contractor's primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Stockton.
21 EXHIBIT 1
535
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby agrees to waive rights of subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss.
Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this . waiver of subrogation. The Workers' Compensation 1>.olicy shall be endorsed .. with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Stockton for all work performed by the ContractCJr, its employ_ees, agents and sutJ.contractors.
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City of Stockton with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City of Stockton before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor's obligation to provide them. The City of Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City of Stockton is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage, subcontractors shall provide coverage with a form at least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.
Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed,Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
Surety Bonds
Contractor shall provide the following Surety Bonds:
1. Bid Bond
2. Performance Bond
3. Payment Bond
4. Maintenance Bond
22 EXHIBIT 1 536
The Payment Bond and the Performance Bond shall be in a sum equal to the contract price. If the Performance Bond provides for a one-year warranty a separate Maintenance Bond is not necessary. If the warranty period specified in the contract is for longer than one year a Maintenance Bond equal to 10% of the contract price is required. Bonds 'shall be duly executed by a responsible corporate surety, authorized to issue suc1, borfds in the state of Calif
o
rnia and-secured tffrough ari authorized agent • -
with an office in California.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other circumstances.
Certificate Holder Address
The address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be:
City of Stockton
Its Officers, Officials, Employees and Volunteers
400 E Main Street, 3rd Floor - HR
Stockton, CA 95202
23 EXHIBIT 1
537
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
General Conditions
The owners, and developers and/or successors-in-interest (the 'ODS') who subdivide property withthe.GanneryPark Subdivision shall comply with the following general conditions.These general conditions may be more specifically detailed in the development scenarios presented herein. These Conditions of Approval (COAs) were updated as part of the Cannery Park Project Amendments(P2�=0435). - - - - •• • •• •• • • • • •
1. Comply with all applicable Federal, State, County, and City codes, regulations, and adopted standards and pay all applicable fees. (#1 ), (SPA#1)
2. Pursuant to Section 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the project shall be subject to all applicable mitigation measures identified in the City-adopted "Findings, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Cannery Park Mixed Use Project." (#2), (SPA#2)
3. Lot 5 and Lot 6 of Cannery Park Unit No. 1 Final Map shall be annexed to the Cannery Park Residential Property Protective Restrictions recorded on May 17, 2017, Document No 2017-055715, San Joaquin County (CC&Rs). The City is declared as a third party beneficiary in Section 9.01 .A of the CC&R's.
4. Based on the effective 200-Year Floodplain Analysis Map, and the Technical Memorandum prepared by WH Consulting Engineers dated January 23, 2024, portions of the project site have areas of potential flooding in excess of three (3) feet from a storm event that has a 1-in-200 chance of occurring in any given year, from sources other than local drainage, in urban and urbanizing areas. The finished floors of future structures shall be elevated to within three (3) feet of the 200-year base flood elevation providing an urban level of flood protection in accordance with SMC
16.90.020(A)2. All future construction will adhere to the City's established Criteria for Development in 200-Year Floodplains, for the issuance of building permits for new residential units in master planned communities.
5. Comply with all applicable Federal, State, County, and City Codes, regulations and adopted standards and pay all applicable fees.
6. The property owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest (ODS) shall be responsible for the City's legal and administrative costs associated with defending any legal challenge of the approval for this project or its related environmental document.
7. To minimize any adverse financial impact on the City of Stockton associated development and/or use of the subject site, the ODS agrees that ii will not challenge, or protest and applicable fees associated with the development of the site, but if such fees are amended or modified, the ODS agree to pay such fees as they may be amended or modified from time to lime.
Traffic & Circulation (Analysis, Phasing and Dedication) 25 EXHIBIT 1
538
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
8. Conduct a queuing and traffic access analysis at proposed signalized intersections to determine appropriate intersection location and required turn pocket/lane length. (#8)
9. The ODS shall conduct a project phasing analysis to determine the liming and level of project development that can occur before degrading the operational level of service atlhe Eight Mile Road/State Highway Route 99 interchange and Morada Lane/Slate Highway Route 99 interchange below level of service that conforms with State Urban Highway Standards. Said study shall be approved by the City and iderififiedimprovemerit liming sfiaHbe 6iriai11g on tne ODs. (#14) •••• •• Traffic & Circulation (Design, Construction and/or Funding Proportionate Share)
10. The ODS shall be responsible for 100 percent of the design and construction costs of on-site roadway and intersection improvements and roadway extensions and public utilities identified on the Tentative Map and/or included in the project EIR, project description or as mitigation measures. Improvements include but are not limited to all sewer, water and storm drain lines, traffic signals, street lighting, street paving, curb, gutter and sidewalk. (#10)
Eight Mile Road Specific Plan
11. If the improvements allowed by Specific Plan Amendment SPA 1-03 are not constructed within five years, the Specific Plan Amendment shall be null and void. (SPA#6)
Domestic Water
12. Appropriately sized utilities and,3-phase electrical service shall be provided for all City owned or operated facilities. (#29)
Oak Tree Avoidance/mitigation
13. Removal of Oak trees shall be avoided whenever feasible. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall coordinate the layout of project plans with the Community Development Department Director t to minimize or eliminate Oak tree removals. If removal of an Oak tree cannot be avoided, the owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall be responsible for replacement of Oak trees on site, as approved by the Community Development Department Director or designated representative. If on-site planting is not possible, the owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall pay the Community Development Department the estimated cost (as determined by the Community Development Department Director or designated representative for the City to have the replacement Oak trees planted by private contract on a site deemed appropriate by the Community Development Department Director of designated representative in accordance with the mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR1-03), as amended, and in the related CEQA Findings, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program for the Cannery Park Mixed Use Project. (#46)
Improvement/Development Plan
26 EXHIBIT 1
539
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
In order to provide an appropriate and reliable Improvement/Development Plan for a mixed-use development with the component elements contained in the Cannery Park Subdivision, the Subdivision has been divided into five (5) Plan Areas (Exhibit 'X'). The on-site/in-tract improvements and the off-site improvements corresponding to subdivision map conditions are listed separately for each Plan Area in Exhibit B (Master Subdivision Agreement Cannery-Park) to the Subdivision Agreement for the Cannery Park Unit No. 1 Final Map, Tract No. 3465.
Cannery Park Subdivision Plan Areas:-The
T
mprrivements associated with each Plan Area are
as follows:
PLAN AREA 'A'
Plan Area 'A' encompasses approximately 112.65± acres and includes Lot 11, Lot 12 (elementary school site), Lot 13 (neighborhood park), and Lot 14. The following general conditions are associated with ,development within Plan Area 'A' for Lot 11:
Morada Lane/Hwy 99 Interchange Frontage Roads
A 1. Provide appropriate security, design and construct the following interim improvements to mitigate near-term impacts and enhance circulation.
A2. Design and install a traffic signal at Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13)
a. NB - one through/left-turn shared lane, and one right-turn lane b. SB - one through/left-turn shared lane, and one right-turn lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one through, one left-turn lane, and one right-turn lane A3. Design and install a traffic signal at the Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane, one through lane and one right-turn lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane If the owner/subdivider of Lot 11 constructs the interim improvements identified in A21 and A22, the payment of a proportionate share of the cost of those improvements as defined in A 18 above is not required.
Morada Lane Interchange Frontage Roads
27 EXHIBIT 1
540
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
A4. Design and install a traffic signal at Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13)
a. NB - one through/left-turn shared lane, and one right-turn lane b. _SB -pne ibrouglJ/left::turn _shared.lane, and one right-turn lane c. EB - one left-turn l'ane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one through, one left-turn lane, and one right-turn lane A5. Design and install a traffic signal at the Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane, one through lane and one right-turn lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane If the owner/subdivider of Lot 14 constructs the interim improvements identified in A39 and A40, the payment of a proportionate
share of the cost of those
improvements as defined in A36 above is not required.
PLAN AREA 'B'
Plan Area 'B' encompasses approximately 99.86± acres consisting of Lot 7, Lot 8, Lot 9 and Lot
10. The following general conditions are associated with development within Plan Area 'B' Lot 7, Lot 8, Lot 9 and Lot 10:
General Conditions
Bikeway, Pedestrian Pathway & Crossings
81. All crossings of Holman Road proposed for bikeway/pedestrian purposes (i.e., "Parkway" and Bear Creek) shall be grade separated or occur at pedestrian actuated (midblock) signals. (#22)
82. The Final Map prepared for Lot 9 and Lot 10 shall show those access point dedications along the south side of Bear Creek that are associated with the class one bike trail. All access points will need to be a separate lot acquired and improved by the ODS. All plans and improvements shall be subject to approval by the, the City Police Department and the City Public Works Department. (#34)
83. The owner/subdivider of Lot 1 O shall provide appropriate security, design and install a bikeway/pedestrian walkway along the south side of the Bear Creek drainage corridor. The bikeway/pedestrian walkway shall consist of an asphalt or concrete bike path as proposed in the project environmental document. Provide a Master Plan for the bikeway/pedestrian walkway prior to approval of the Final Map. The Master Plan shall contain but not be limited to the following component plans: signage, bollards, public access, landscaping, fencing, security (including hours of operation), and maintenance (including litter removal). A consolidated maintenance district will be 28 EXHIBIT 1
541
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
responsible for litter clean-up for the Bear Creek Corridor. The master plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. (#40), (#48)
B4. Prior to the recording a Final Subdivision Map within Plan Area B, design and submit to the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) the plans necessary to obtain UPRR approval of an a bikeway/pedestrian walkway crossing of the UPRR right-of-way along the south levee bank of Bear Creek.
Easements
B5. Comply with all requirements of agencies having jurisdiction over the Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID). (#25)
B6. The Final Map for Lot 9 and Lot 10 shall include a ten (10) foot easement from the existing toe of the levee along Bear Creek for maintenance of all levee slopes. Note:
This condition is not required if the easement is already included as a component of another recorded map. (#18)
B7. Provide an accessible 10-foot wide maintenance/access easement or license agreement from UPRR for access purposes along the westerly side and a 3-foot wide maintenance/access easement along the easterly side of the masonry soundwall/fence constructed on the western side of Lot 10. (#33) Disclosure/Notification
B8. The owner/subdivider of Lot 10 shall disclose to all prospective home buyers as a condition of sale and prior to the opening of escrow, the existence of any present or former remediation site (lead or any other contaminant) within the project boundaries. (#43)
The following on-site/in-tract improvements are necessary to support development within Plan Area 'B' Lot 7, Lot 8, Lot 9 and Lot 10:
On-site/In-tract Improvements Holman Road
B9. Prior to recording a final subdivision map within Lot 7, Lot 8, or Lot 1 O within Plan Area B, prepare preliminary design plans and submit permit applications with Federal and State permitting agencies for the Holman Road Bridge crossing at Bear Creek and extension of Holman Road to Eight Mile Road. If the Federal and State permitting agencies approve and issue permits for the Holman Road Bridge crossing at Bear Creek, then prior to recording any additional final subdivision maps within Plan Area B, design and submit for City approval plans for the Holman Road Bridge crossing at Bear Creek and the extension of Holman Road to Eight Mile Road. Upon approval of the Homan Road Bridge and extension plans by the City, initiate the construction of the extension of Holman Road to Eight Mile Road and the Holman Road Bridge crossing at Bear Creek. To assure adequate right- of-way is reserved to accommodate the Holman Road Bridge crossing at Bear Creek, no final subdivision map(s) shall be recorded within Lot 9 until the Federal and State permitting agencies approve and issue permits for the Holman Road Bridge crossing at Bear Creek.
Include median lighting. (#11)
29 EXHIBIT 1
542
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
B10. Concurrent with the construction of the extension of Holman Road to Eight Mile Road, install barricades per City of Stockton standards at the intersection of Holman Road and Cannery Circle/Tri-Valley Drive.
B11. Install bus turnouts at the intersection of Holman Road and Pfc Jessie Mizener Street and Holman Road and Eight Mile Road as depicted on the tentative map. (#17) B12. • The owner/subdivider of Lot 8 and Lot 9 shall construct a masonry sound wall along the east side of Holman Road from the northern boundary of the Woodbridge Irrigation District canal easement northward to The Bear Creek levee. The height of the soundwall shall be a minimum of seven feet, subject to design approval by the Community Development Director. (#47)
B13. The owner/subdivider of Lot 10 shall construct a masonry sound wall along the west side of Holman Road from the northern boundary of the Woodbridge Irrigation District canal easement northward to The Bear Creek levee. The height of the soundwall shall be a minimum of seven feet, subject to design approval by the Community Development Director. (#47)
B14. Access to Holman Road shall be restricted except at public street intersections. (#7) B15. Install landscaping and sidewalk between masonry soundwall and back of curb subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. (#40)
Lt. Col. Mark Taylor Street
B16. The owner/subdivider of Loi 10 shall construct the road to the full ninety-six (96) foot width (sixty-six (66) feet from curb face to curb face) from the western most curb flare at the intersection of Lt. Col. Mark Taylor Street and Street 'P' to the west(lrn boundary of Cannery Park TM8-04A&B at a time determined to be appropriate by the Public Works Director.
B17. Access to Lt. Col. Mark Taylor Street shall be restricted except at public street intersections. (#7)
B18. Construct a masonry sound wall along the north side of Lt. Col. Mark Taylor Street beginning at the western curb flare of the intersection of Lt. Col. Mark Taylor Street and Holman Road extending westward to the property boundary. The height of the soundwalls shall be at a minimum of seven feet, subject to design approval by the Community Development Director. (#47)
B19. Install landscaping and sidewalk between masonry soundwall and back of curb subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. (#40)
Pfc. Jessie Mizener Street
B20. The owner/subdivider of Lot 7, Lot 8 or Lot 9 shall construct Pfc Jessie Mizener Street pursuant to the following improvement conditions. Note: In the event that the 30 EXHIBIT 1
543
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
Holman Road Road/Bear Creek Bridge is not granted its environmental permits allowing for its construction, and security has been provided for the construction of the bridge and Holman Road to Eight Mile Road, then in order to accommodate the daily trips from Improvement Plan Area B, the first final map within Plan Area B (i.e., Lot 7, Lot 8, Lot 9 or Lot 10) shall include the construction of Pfc Jessie Mizener Street pursuant to the dimensions and segment length described in B26 below.
B21. Construct the road to the full seventy-eight (78) foot width (forty-eight (48) feet from curb faceto curl:5 face) from approximately one nunclred (100ffeenivesC6flne western most curb flare at the intersection with Holman Road and Pfc Jessie Mizener Street to the State Route Hwy 99 Frontage Road.
B22. Install a barricade per City of Stockton standards at the intersection of Pfc Jessie Mizener Street and Collector A.
B23. Access to Pfc Jessie Mizener Street shall be restricted except at public street intersections. (#7)
B24. The owner/subdivider of Lot 9 shall construct a masonry sound wall along the north side of Pfc Jessie Mizener Street beginning at the eastern most curb flare of the intersection of Holman Road and Pfc Jessie Mizener Street eastward across the southern property boundary intersecting with the easement of the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal; excepting appropriate access points into the subdivision.
The height of the soundwall shall be at a minimum of seven feet, subject to design approval by the Community Development Director. (#47)
B25. The owner/subdivider of Lot 8 shall construct a masonry sound wall along the south side of Pfc Jessie Mizener Street beginning at the eastern most curb flare of the intersection of Holman Road and Pfc Jessie Mizener Street eastward along the northern boundary of the property intersecting with the easement of the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal; excepting appropriate access points into the subdivision.
The height of the soundwall shall be at a minimum of seven feet, subject to design approval by the Community Development Director. (#4 7)
B26. The owner/subdivider of Lot 7 shall construct a masonry sound wall along the south side of Pfc Jessie Mizener Street beginning at the eastern boundary of the Woodbridge Irrigation District canal easement (Lot GG) eastward along the northern boundary of the property intersecting with the western boundary of Lot 5; excepting appropriate access points into the subdivision. The height of the soundwall shall be at a minimum of seven feet, subject to design approval by the Community Development Director. (#47)
B27. Install landscaping and sidewalk between masonry soundwall and back of curb subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. (#40)
Minor roads and Collectors
B28. Rights of ways and/or lot layouts shall be reconfigured as necessary to accommodate traffic calming measures required by City Standard including, but not limited to, roundabouts and traffic circles. (#41)
31 EXHIBIT 1
544
Off-site Improvements
Eight Mile Road
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
829. Prior to recording a final subdivision map within Plan Area B, design and submit for City approval a traffic signal at the intersection of Holman Road and Eight Mile Road and interim intersection improve ments to the satisfaction of the Public Works Dlrector, mc:luding appropriate alignment and sfriping of the intersection turn lanes and the provision of transition lanes on the south side of Eight Mile Road approaching and departing Holman Road. Provide vehicle acceleration and de acceleration lanes, as appropriate. The improvements described in this Section 831 shall be constructed concurrent with the construction of the Holman Road Bridge crossing at Bear Creek and the extension of Holman Road to Eight Mile Road in conformance with Section 810 above. (#10), (#13)
Other Intersections/Roadways
830. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total dally trip generation estimate associated with Lot 7 (i.e., 804), the owner/subdivider of Lot 7 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 1.65%) of the total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
a. Eight Mile Road/Ham Lane;
b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and g. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements). 831. The proportionate share for roadway improvements at West Lane/Arterial A intersection for the Cannery Park TM8-04A&B is two percent (2%). Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 7 (i.e., 804), the owner/subdivider of Lot 7 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 1.65%) of the two-percent (2%) share of the cost of roadway improvements at the West Lane/Arterial A intersection. (#16) B32. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the
total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 8 (i.e., 641), the owner/subdivider of Lot 8 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 1.32%) of the total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
a. Eight Mile Road/Ham Lane;
b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and 32 EXHIBIT 1
545
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
g. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements).
B33. The proportionate share for roadway improvements at West Lane/Arterial A intersection for the Cannery Park TM8-04A&B is two percent (2%). Based upon the total dally trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 8 (i.e., 641), the owner/subdivider of Lot 8 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 1.32%) of the two-percent (2%) share of ... the c_o_st of roadway improvements at the West Larie/Arterial A intersection. (#16) B34. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 9 (i.e., 842), the owner/subdivider of Loi 9 shall pay a proportionate s�are (i.e., 1.73%) of the total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
a. Eight Mile Road/Ham Lane;
b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road. (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and g. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Roacf (interim improvements).
B35. The proportionate share for roadway improvements at West Lane/Arterial A intersection for the Cannery Park TM8-04A&B is two percent (2%). Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 9 (i.e., 842), the owner/subdivider of Lot 9 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 1.73%) of the two-percent (2%) share of the cost of roadway improvements at the West Lane/Arterial A intersection. (#16) B36. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 10 (i.e., 4,087), the owner/subdivider of Lot 10 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 8.39%) of the total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
a. Eight Mile Road/Ham Lane;
b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and g. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements).
B37. The proportionate share for roadway improvements at West Lane/Arterial A intersection for the Cannery Park TM8-04A&B is two percent (2%). Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 1 O (i.e., 4,087), the owner/subdivider of Lot 10 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 8.39%) of the two percent (2%) share of the cost of roadway improvements at the West Lane/Arterial A intersection. (#16)
33 EXHIBIT 1
546
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
Other Facilities
838. Based upon the total gross acreage of land designated as single family residential on TM8-04A&B (i.e., 197. 77 acres) compared to the total gross acreage associated with Lot 7 on TM8-04A&B (i.e., 9.01 acres), the owner/subdivider of Lot 7 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 4.6%) of the costs associated with the following improvements:
a. Bear Creek pedestrian/bicycle trail; and
b. Temporary Park & Ride Loi to be located on lot 17.
839. Based upon the total gross acreage of land designated as single family residential on TM8-04A&B (i.e., 197. 77 acres) compared to the total gross acreage associated with Lot 8 on TM8-04A&B (i.e., 6.59 acres), the owner/subdivider of Lot 8 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 3.3%) of the costs associated with the following improvements:
a. Bear Creek pedestrian/bicycle trail; and
b. Temporary Park & Ride Loi to be located on lot 17.
840. Based upon the total gross acreage of land designated as single family residential on TM8-04A&B (i.e., 197.77 acres) compared to the total gross acreage associated with Lot 9 on TM8-04A&B (i.e., 9.29 acres), the owner/subdivider of Lot 9 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 4.7%) of the costs associated with the following im.provements:
a. Bear Creek pedestrian/bicycle trail; and
b. Temporary Park & Ride Lot to be located on lot 17.
841. Based upon the total gross acreage of land designated as single family residential on TM8-04A&B (i.e., 197.77 acres) compared to the total gross acreage associated with Lot 10 on TM8-04A&B (i.e., 74.97 acres), the owner/subdivider of Lot 10 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 37.9%) of the costs associated with the following improvements:
a. Temporary Park & Ride Lot to be located on lot 17.
Note: If development occurs within Plan Area 'B' prior to occurring in Plan Area 'A', the following on-site/in-tract improvements shall occur:
Holman Road
842. Construct Holman Road to the full one hundred thirty-four (134) foot width (one hundred fourteen (114) feet from curb face to curb face) from southern boundary of TM8-04A&8 to the Woodbridge Irrigation canal easement. Include median lighting. (#11)
843. Install a barricade per City of Stockton standards at the northern curb flare of the intersection of Holman Road and Lt. Col. Mark Taylor Street/Hendrix Drive. 34 EXHIBIT 1
547
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
844. Install bus turnouts at the intersection of Holman Road and Lt. Col. Mark Taylor Street/Hendrix Drive as depicted on the tentative map. (#17) 845. Access to Holman Road shall be restricted except at public street intersections. (#7) Lt. Col. Mark-Taylor Street
846. Construct the road to the full ninety-six (96) foot width (sixty-six (66) feet from curb face to curb faceffrom the western most curb flarea
T
the intersection with Holman
Road westward to a point located approximately fifty feet (50) west of the intersection of Lt. Col. Mark Taylor Street and Street 'P'. Include median lighting.
Off-site Improvements
Eight Mile Road Interchange Frontage Roads
Provide appropriate security, design and construct the following interim improvements to mitigate near-term impacts and enhance circulation. 847. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road/West Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane 848. Design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road/East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane 849. Install stop signs at the intersection of the north bound off-ramp and East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one right-lane and one through lane
c. EB - one left-turn lane and one right-turn lane
d. WB - Not applicable
If the owner/subdivider of Lot 7, Lot 8, Lot 9 or Lot 10 constructs the interim improvements identified in 850, 851 and 852, the payment of a proportionate share of the cost of those improvements as defined in 832, 834, 836 and 838 above is not required of the owner/subdivider who constructed said improvements. 35 EXHIBIT 1
548
EXHIBIT D -Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
Note: If development occurs in Improvement Plan Area 'B' prior to occurring in Improvement Plan Area 'A', the following off-site improvements shall occur:
Morada Lane Interchange Frontage Roads
Provide appropriate security, design and construct the following interim improvements to mitigate near-term impacts and enhance circulation.
B50. Design--and tnstawa traffic s1gnaratMoraaa Lane/Hwy99-WefsfFror\lageRoaa and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13)
a. NB - one through/left-turn shared lane, and one right-turn lane b. SB - one through/left-turn shared lane, and one right-turn lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one through, one left-turn lane, and one right-turn lane B51. Design and install a traffic signal al the.Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane, one through lane and one right-turn lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane If the owner/subdivider of Lot 7, Lot 8, Lot 9 or Lot 10 constructs the interim improvements identified in B53 and B54, the payment of a proportionate share of the cost of those improvements as defined in B32, B34, B36 and B38 above is not required of the owner/subdivider who constructed said improvements.
PLAN AREA 'C'
Plan Area 'C' encompasses approximately 73.52± acres of light industrial/business park uses, consisting of the Lot 1, Lot 2 and Lot 3. The following general conditions are associated with development within Improvement Plan Area 'C':
General Conditions
Easements
C1. The owner/subdivider of Lot 2 shall comply with all requirements of agencies having
jurisdiction over the Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID). (#25) C2. The Final Map for Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall include a ten (10) foot easement from the existing toe of the levee along Bear Creek for maintenance of all levee slopes. Note:
This condition is not required if the easement is already included as a component of another recorded map. (#18)
C3. Provide non-exclusive access easements within the industrial and commercial areas as necessary to provide all required lot accesses. (#24) 36 EXHIBIT 1
549
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
Transportation System Management
C4. The owner/subdivider of Lots 1 and 2 shall participate in any Transportation Systems Management (TSM) programs established by the City of Stockton and provide a permanent area for a park and ride facility as a part of the development of Lots 1, 2, 4 or 5, or a combination thereof. Lot 17 is considered an interim park & ride location that will eventually be eliminated with the reconstruction of the State Highway Route 99/Eight Mile Road interchange. The Park and Ride facility may be a stand-alone· designated lot or may consist of designated spaces within a parking area in the above referenced lots. The required number of park & ride spaces shall be determined by the Public Works Director in consultation with Caltrans. (# 21) The following on-site/in-tract improvements are necessary to support development within Improvement Plan Area 'C':
On-site/In-tract Improvements
Signature Drive
C5. Dedicate the right-of-way and construct the road to the full sixty (60) foot width (forty (40) feet from curb face to curb face) from Eight Mile Road southward as depicted on TM8-04A&B.
Cannery Circle
C6. The owner/subdivider of Lot 2 shall dedicate the right-of-way and construct the road to the full seventy-eight (78) foot width (forty-eight (48) feet from curb face to curb face) from Holman Road westward approximately 365 feet as depicted on the tentative map. Dedicate the right-of-way and construct the road to the full sixty (60) foot width (forty (40) feet from curb face to curb face) as depicted on TM8-04A&B.
Off-site Improvements
Golfview Road
C7. Design and construct a traffic signal at the future intersection of Eight Mile Road/Golfview Road/Signature Drive and stripe to provide the following lane configuration (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and 1through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and two through lanes
d. WB - one through lane and one through/right-turn shared lane Other Roadways/Intersections
C8. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 1 (i.e., 4,061), the owner/subdivider of Lot 1 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 8.33%) of the total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
37 EXHIBIT 1
550
a. Eight Mile Road/Ham Lane;
b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
EXHIBiT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and g. M6facla
l
.ane7Rwi99�st Frontage Roaa(interim improvemen{sT- - -
C9. The proportionate share for roadway improvements at West Lane/Arterial A intersection for the Cannery Park TM8-04A&B is two percent (2%). Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 1 (i.e., 4,061), the owner/subdivider of Lot 1 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 8.33%) of the two-percent (2%) share of the cost of roadway improvements at the West lane/Arterial A intersection. (#16) C10. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 2 (i.e., 5,844), the owner/subdivider of Lot 2 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 12.00%) of the total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
a. Eight Mile Road/Ham Lane;
• b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and g. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements).
C11. The proportionate share for roadway improvements at West Lane/Arterial A intersection for the Cannery Park TM8-04A&B is two percent (2%). Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 2 (i.e., 5,844), the owner/subdivider of Lot 2
shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 12.00%) of the two-percent (2%) share of the cost of roadway improvements at the West Lane/Arterial A intersection. (#16) Note: If development occurs in Improvement Plan Area 'C' prior to occurring in Improvement Plan Areas 'B' or 'D', the following on-site/in- tract improvements shall occur:
Holman Road
C12. Construct Holman Road to the full one hundred thirty-four (134) foot width (one hundred fourteen (114) feet from curb face to curb face) from Eight Mile Road southward to Bear Creek. Include median lighting. (#11) C13. Install a bus turnout ai the intersection of Holman Road and Eight Mile Road as depicted on TM8-04A&B. (#17)
38 EXHIBIT 1
551
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
C 14. Access to Holman Road shall be restricted except at public street intersections. (#7) Traffic Signals/Intersection Improvements
C15. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Holman Road and Cannery Circle/Tri-Valley Drive. Activation of the traffic signal shall be at the discretion of the Public Works Director. (#13 )
Note: lfttevelopmenn:>ccurs-inlmp-rovement Plan Area •c•··priot-io· occurring··irl Improvement Plan Areas 'B', 'D' or 'E', the following off-site improvements shall occur:
Eight Mile Road
C16. Comply with all conditions of Specific Plan Amendment SPA1-03 and install all improvements required by said amendment. (#6)
C17. Install frontage improvements from the western boundary ofTM8-04A&B eastward to the eastern boundary of TM8-04A&B, including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement widening and street lighting along Eight Mile Road to provide a minimum 72-foot half street section. (#5)
C18. Existing points of access shall remain unrestricted until such time as the Eight Mile Road improvements are constructed or until an adjacent parcel is developed. (#12) C19. Install a continuous eleven (11) foot minimum width deceleration lane on the south side of Eight Mile Road for a minimum of 200 feet west of the driveway located approximately 800 feet east of the Union Pacific Railroad (formerly the SPRR). (SPA #5)
C20. The Project driveway(s) on Eight Mile Road shall be limited to a total of four (three new) driveways and shall be limited to right-turn in/right-turn out. Driveways shall be spaced a minimum distance of 300 feet from any intersection, driveway or creek and shall be a minimum of 750 feet from the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. Project driveway(s) shall be designed and constructed to prevent on-site cross traffic for a minimum distance of 100 feet from the future property line along Eight Mile Road. (SPA# 3)
C2 1. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Holman Road and Eight Mile Road. Construct interim intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, including appropriate alignment and striping of the intersection turn lanes and the provision of transition lanes on the south side of Eight Mile Road approaching and departing Holman Road. Provide vehicle acceleration and de acceleration lanes, as appropriate. (#10 ), (#13)
Eight Mile Road Interchange Frontage Roads
C22. Provide appropriate security, design and construct the following interim improvements to mitigate near-term impacts and enhance circulation. 39 EXHIBIT 1
552
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
C23. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road/West Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane C24. Design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road/East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane C25. Install stop signs at the intersection of the north bound off-ramp and East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13),
(#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one right-lane and one through lane
c. EB - one left-turn lane and one right-turn lane
d. WB - Not applicable
If the owner/subdivider of Lot 1 or Lot 2 constructs the interim improvements identified in C23, C24 and C25, the payment of a proportionate share of the cost of those improvements as defined in C9 and C11 above is not required of the owner/subdivider who constructed said improvements.
PLAN AREA 'D'
Improvement Plan Area 'D' encompasses approximately 32.09± acres of business park/commercial uses consisting of Lot 4. Improvement Plan Area 'D' encompasses approximately 18.74 ± acres of business park/commercial uses and 12.34± acres of high density residential on Lot 4 of Cannery Park Unit No. 1 Final Map. The following conditions are associated with development within Improvement Plan Area 'D', Lot 4 (Parcels GC Lot 1 through CG Lot 15 and RH Lot 1) These conditions are based on Tentative Map approval of the Cannery Park Amendments (P21-0435):
General Conditions
D1. Prior to the approval of any Final Map, General Plan amendment, Rezoning and Development Agreement shall be approved by the City Council.
D2. Prior to the approval of any Building Permit for new structures, future residential development is subject to obtaining a Design Review approval per SMC Section
16.120.020(A)(1 )(a).
40 EXHIBIT 1
553
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
D3. The ODS shall install full frontage improvements on Eight Mile Road, within the limits of the site, including, but not limited to, sidewalks, street lighting, and driveway installation. Said improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy of any buildings/structures on this site or prior to initiation of residential use. Further, all off site improvements shall conform to City of Stockton Standard Plans and Specifications.
D4. The property Owners,Developers,-and/or SuGcessors-in-lnterest must provide a - single master water meter for each of the high-density residential developments. The master meter will be located near the entrance of the high-density development.
D5. The future design of the commercial and high-density residential sites shall comply with the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines. To ensure high-quality design and enhanced pedestrian/motor design, the following Design Guideline measures shall be applied to future Site Plan and Design Review submittals for any commercial and residential application:
• (3.03.070) Parking courts should be well designed, with consideration given to landscaping, lighting, building massing, and pedestrian/vehicular circulation.
• (3.03.070) Convenient pedestrian connections should be provided to adjoining residential developments, commercial projects, and other compatible land uses.
• (3.03.070) Pedestrian access to adjacent existing or planned open space areas and corridors should be provided for the development's residents. • (3.03.070) Cross circulation between vehicles and pedestrians should be _minimized.A continuous, clearly marked walkway should be provided from the parking areas to main entrances of buildings.
• (4.01 .030) Provide safe, convenient, and efficient vehicular assessment, circulation, parking, loading, and maneuvering. Encourage pedestrian activity by providing convenient access and safe pedestrian routes. • (4.01 .040) Ensuring that new development considers its relationship to and interface with surrounding existing development, especially residential uses.
Easements Conditions
D6. Comply with all requirements of agencies
having jurisdiction over the Woodbridge
Irrigation District (WID). (#25)
D7. The Final Map for Lot 4 shall include a ten (10) foot easement from the existing toe of the levee along Bear Creek for maintenance of all levee slopes. Note: This condition is not required if the easement is already included as a component of another recorded map. (#18)
Public Works/Engineering
41 EXHIBIT 1
554
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
DB. The owner/subdivider shall participate in any Transportation Systems Management (TSM) programs established by the City of Stockton and provide a permanent area for a park and ride facility as a part of the development of Lots 1, 2, 4 or 5, or a combination thereof. Lot 17 is considered an interim park & ride location that will eventually be eliminated with the reconstruction of the State Highway Route 99/Eight Mile Road interchange. The Park and Ride facility may be a stand-alone designated lot or may consist of designated spaces within a parking area in the above .referenced lots.-+he-required-number-ofpark-& ride spaces shall be determined by the Public Works Director in consultation with Caltrans. (# 21) How many park and ride spaces will be required?
D9. the ODS shall design and submit offsite improvement plans to the Community Development Department - Engineering Section for approval. Improvement Plans shall include but not be limited to traffic signal modifications, installation of roundabouts, traffic calming devices, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway access, wheelchair ramps, streetlight standards, and public utilities. A Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted with the improvement plans. Offsite improvements shall be constructed per City Standards prior to the issuance of any building permits.
D10. The ODS shall construct the private street per City 'standards.
D11. The ODS shall make necessary right-of-way dedications along the frontage of the project site to ensure all public improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, wheelchair ramps, signals, and the like, are appropriated the needed public right of way.
D12. All off-site improvements proposed with the project shall require the preparation and submission of improvement plans to include but not limited to the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, paving, and landscaping. The ODS shall provide proof of reclamation district approval for all improvement on, or adjacent to, the existing levees. Proof must be submitted prior to Site Improvement Plans.
D13. All improvements adjacent to Bear Creek are subject to the agency having jurisdiction of this waterway along with any dedication requirements that are required for this development.
D14. All off-site improvements proposed with the project shall require the preparation and submission of Improvement Plans and shall be subject to review and approval of the Director.
Municipal Utilities Department
D15. The property Owners, Developers, and/or Successors in Interest must provide a single master water meter for each of the high-density residential developments. The master meter will be located near the entrance of the high-density development.
D16. The property Owners, Developers, and/or Successors in Interest shall comply with any and all requirements, and pay all associated fees, as required by the City's 42 EXHIBIT 1
555
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program as set forth in its NPDES Storm Water Permit.
D17. The ODS shall connect the Cannery Park (North) project to a 24-inch water main in Eight Mile Road that runs from West Lane to STATE ROUTE 99 and is connected to the 24-inch water main in West Lane from Bear Creek to Eight Mile Road and also connected to a 24-inch water main in N. STATE ROUTE 99 W. Frontage Road from EightMile_RoadtoJ'FC JesseMizenerStreet; alLof whichis_identifiedinJhe 2022- City Water Master Plan and will provide sufficient water supply and pressure to the project site. If the 24-inch water main is not available for the project to make said connection, then the ODS shall provide a water model identifying the improvements, if any, that are required to provide sufficient water supply and pressure to the project site and upon approval of the water model by the Director of Municipal Utilities, prepare improvement plans to be approved by the Director, and construct any required improvements. This includes any offsite approval that requires subsequent permits and environmental review. The ODS shall construct 8' masonry walls to enclose the perimeter of the City pump and controls in the new sewer pump station.
Note: If construction occurs in Improvement Plan Area 'D' prior to occurring in Improvement Plan Area 'C', the following improvement shall occur:
On-site/in-tract Improvements
0 Street Tri-Valley Drive is referenced as O Street on TM P21-0435 so all references to O Street should be changed to O Street so it correlates with TM D18. Dedicate the right-of-way and construct the road to the full width from curb face to curb face from Holman Road eastward to and including the cul-de-sac. Right of way dedication shall be for the purpose of constructing full roadway width suitable for the adjacent land use.
P Street Collector A is referenced as P Street on TM P21-0435 so all references to Collector A should be changed to P Street so it correlates with the TM D19. Dedicate the right-of-way and construct the road to the full width from curb face to curb face from Eight Mile Road southward to and including the cul-de-sac. Right of way dedication shall be for the purpose of constructing full roadway width suitable for the adjacent land use
Access to P Street shall be restricted within 300 feet from the intersection with Eight Mile Road.
D20. Install bus turnouts at the intersection of Collector A and Eight Mile Road as depicted on TM8-04A&B. (#17)
D21. A full access intersection shall be allowed at Eight Mile Road and P Street, located 1,000 feet west of the west frontage road and a traffic signal shall be installed to use the access. (SPA#4)
43 EXHIBIT 1
556
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
Traffic Signals/Intersection Improvements
D22. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road and P Street.
Activation of the traffic signal shall be at the discretion of the Public Works Director. (#13)
Off-sitelmprovements
Other Roadways/Intersections
D23. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 4 (i.e., 5,914), the owner/subdivider of Lot 4 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 12.13%) of the total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
a. Eight Mile Road/Ham Lane;
b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and g. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements).
D24. The proportionate share for roadway improvements at West Lane/Arterial A intersection for the Cannery Park TMB-04A&B is two percent (2%). Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 4 (i.e., 5,914), the owner/subdivider of Lot 4 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 12.13%) of the two-percent (2%) share of the cost of roadway improvements at the West Lane/Arterial A intersection. (#16) Note: If development occurs in Improvement Plan Area 'D' prior to occurring in Improvement Plan Areas 'B' or 'C', the following on-site/in- tract improvements shall occur:
Holman Road
D25. Construct Holman Road to the full width from curb face to curb face from Eight Mile Road southward to Bear Creek. Include median lighting. (#11) D26. Install a bus turnout at the intersection of Holman Road and Eight Mile Road as depicted on the tentative map. (#17)
D27. Access to Holman Road shall be restricted except at public street intersections. (#7) Traffic Signals/Intersection Improvements
44 EXHIBIT 1
557
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
D28. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Holman Road and Cannery Circle/O Street. Activation of the traffic signal shall be at the discretion of the Public Works Director. (#13)
Note: If development occurs in Improvement Plan Area 'D' prior to occurring in Improvement Plan Areas 'B', 'C' or 'E', the following off-site improvements shall occur:
EigntlvlileRoaa-
D29. Comply with all conditions of Specific Plan Amendment SPA 1-03 and install all improvements required by said amendment. (#6) An update to the Precise Plan is ongoing where lanes and right-of-way will be reduced in conformance with the General Plan.
D30. Install frontage improvements from Holman Road eastward to the eastern boundary of TM P21-0435 including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement widening and street lighting along Eight Mile Road to provide a minimum 72-foot half street section. (#5) Full width shall comply with the updated Precise Road Plan D31. Existing points of access shall remain unrestricted until such time as the Eight Mile Road improvements are constructed or until an adjacent parcel is developed. (#12) D32. Install a continuous eleven (11) foot minimum width deceleration lane on the south side of Eight Mile Road for a minimum of 200 feet west of the driveway located approximately 800 feet east of the Union Pacific Railroad (formerly the SPRR). (SPA #5)
D33. The Project driveway(s) on Eight Mile Road shall be limited to a total of four (three new) driveways and shall be limited to right-turn in/right-turn out. Driveways shall be spaced a minimum distance of 300 feet from any intersection, driveway or creek and shall be a minimum of 750 feet from the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. Project driveway(s) shall be designed and constructed to prevent on-site cross traffic for a minimum distance of 100 feet from the future property line along Eight Mile Road. (SPA #3)
D34. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Holman Road and Eight Mile Road. Construct interim intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, including appropriate alignment and striping of the intersection turn lanes and the provision of transition lanes on the south side of Eight Mile Road approaching and departing Holman Road. Provide vehicle acceleration and de acceleration lanes, as appropriate. (#10), (#13)
Eight Mile Road Interchange Frontage Roads
Provide appropriate security, design and construct the following interim improvements to mitigate near-term impacts and enhance circulation.
D35. D26. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road/West Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations. (#10), (#13), (#16)
45 EXHIBIT 1
558
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane D36. Design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road/East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations:- (#lO), (#'IB),(#16)- •• - • - - - -- a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane D37. Install stop signs at the intersection of the north bound off-ramp and East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane b. SB - one right-lane and one through lane
c. EB - one left-turn lane and one right-turn lane
d. WB - Not applicable
If the owner/subdivider of Lot 4 constructs the interim improvements identified in D48, D49, and D50, the payment of a proportionate share of the cost of those improvements as defined in D36 above is not requir�d.
PLAN AREA 'E'
Plan Area 'E' encompasses approximately 67. 7 4± acres consisting of the Lot 5 and Lot 6. The following conditions are associated with development within Improvement Plan Area 'E', Lot 5 (Lots 1-267, Lot A Park/Open Space, and Lot B Basin) and Lot 6 (Lots 268-331) These conditions are based on Tentative Map approval of the Cannery Park Amendments (P21-0435):
General Conditions
E1. Prior to the approval of any Final Map, General Plan amendment, Rezoning ·and Development Agreement shall be approved by the City Council.
E2. Prior to the approval of any building permit for the construction of new homes, future residential development is subject to obtaining a Design Review approval per SMC Section 16.120.020(A)(1 )(a).
E3. Lots 181 and 43 will be required to have an 8' tall masonry wall between Lot A and the residential lots. The wall shall be constructed on private property.
E4. In lieu of a Bike Path along the top of the south bank of Bear Creek fronting the project site, a bike path shall be included in the design of the Park/Open Space on 46 EXHIBIT 1
559
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
Lot A and shall be constructed as per the Second Amended Development Agreement.
E5. ODS shall design and submit offsite improvement plans to the Community Development Department - Engineering Section for approval. Improvement Plans shall include but not be limited to traffic signal modifications, installation of roundabouts, traffic calming devices, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway access, wheelchair-ramps,streetlig ht-standards,-and public utilities,A Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted with the improvement plans. Offsite improvements shall be constructed per City Standards prior to the issuance of any building permits.
E6. The ODS shall restrict the lots represented as Lots 291-296 in Village H to single story homes.
Neighborhood Park Conditions
NOTE: The following conditions specify the park obligations outlined in the Cannery Park Project Development Agreement.
E7. The ODS shall provide a turn-key developed park/open space (Lot A) to the City at no cost to the City, designed, improved, and maintained to the satisfaction of the City via a DOA. Such developed Lot A and other adjacent easements shall be maintained through the City's CLMAD or other entity acceptable to the City.
EB. The ODS shall maintain Lot A including all adjacent undeveloped easements and bike/pedestrian paths to the satisfaction of the City until the City has finally accepted the developed park/open space as completed publicly usable facilities.
Fire Department
E9. Fire hydrant locations, installation, and design shall be per COS Standards.
E10. Residential street design shall be per COS Standards.
E11. All single-family homes shall have automatic fire sprinklers designed and installed per NFPA 13-D Standards.
E12. A minimum of 1-inch water meters shall be installed at each single-family home to accommodate the domestic water and fire sprinkler demands.
E13. Deferred submittals are required for the fire sprinkler plans (per model type).
Public Works/Engineering
47 EXHIBIT 1
560
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
E14. The ODS shall make necessary right-of-way dedications along the frontage of the project site to ensure all public improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, wheelchair ramps, and the like, are within the public right of way.
E15. The ODS shall design and submit offsite improvement plans to the Community Development Department - Engineering Section for approval. Improvement Plans shall include but not be limited to traffic signal modifications, installation of . roundabouts,. traffic calming. cievices, curb, g utter,-siciewal k,. driveway-access, wheelchair ramps, streetlight standards, and public utilities. A Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted with the improvement plans. Offsite improvements shall be constructed per City Standards prior to the issuance of any building permits.
E16. The ODS shall install full frontage improvements on PFC Jesse Mizener Street, within the limits of the site, including, but not limited to, sidewalks, street lighting, and driveway installation. Said improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy of any buildings/structures on this site or prior to initiation of residential use. Further, all off site improvements shall conform to City of Stockton Standard Plans and Specifications.
E17. Per the Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.72, development on the site shall require site frontage improvements, including, but not limited to, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, paving, and landscaping.
E18. The property owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall submit subdivision master plans, or indicate compliance of existing master plans, for water, storm, and sanitary sewer service. These plans shall show all on-site and off-site utilities necessary to provide water, storm, and sanitary sewer utility service. These plans shall be approved by the Deputy Municipal Utilities District Director of Engineering & Department Services prior to the submittal of any improvement plans.
E 19. The ODS shall be responsible (at no cost to the City) for all the improvements to the open space areas (greenbelt, related landscape improvements, and connecting lots (incl. lighting) all to the satisfaction of the City representative. This includes completion of the Class 1 bike pathway along Bear Creek. Proof must be submitted prior to Site Improvement Plans.
E20. All off-site improvements proposed with the project shall require the preparation and submission of improvement plans to include but not limited to the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, paving, and landscaping. The ODS shall provide proof of reclamation district approval for all improvement on, or adjacent to, the existing levees. Proof must be submitted prior to Site Improvement Plans.
E21. All improvements adjacent to Bear Creek are subject to the agency having jurisdiction of this waterway along with any dedication requirements that are required for this development.
48 EXHIBIT 1
561
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
E22. All off-site improvements proposed with the project shall require the preparation and submission of Improvement Plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director.
Municipal Utilities Department
E23. The JJ[op�rl',' Owners, _Oeveloper_i,, arid/or Succe�sors in LnteresLshall comply with any and all requirements, and pay all associated fees, as required by the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program as set forth in its NPDES Storm Water Permit.
E24. The ODS shall provide a water model identifying the improvements, if any, that are required to provide sufficient water supply and pressure to the project site and upon approval of the water model by the Director of Municipal Utilities, prepare improvement plans to be approved by the Director, and construct any required improvements. This includes any offsite approval that requires subsequent permits and environmental review. The ODS shall connect the Cannery Park (North) project to a 24-inch water main in Eight Mile Road that runs from West Lane to STATE ROUTE 99 and is connected to the 24-inch water main in West Lane from Bear Creek to Eight Mile Road and also connected to a 24-inch water main in N. STATE ROUTE 99 W. Frontage Road from Eight Mile Road to PFC Jesse Mizener Street; all of which is identified in the 2022 City Water Master Plan and will provide sufficient water supply and pressure to the project site. If the 24-inch water main is not available for the project to make said connection, then the ODS shall provide a water model identifying the improvements, if any, that are required to provide sufficient water supply and pressure to the project site and upon approval of the water model by the Director of Municipal Utilities, prepare improvement plans to be approved by the Director, and construct any required improvements. This includes any offsite approval that requires subsequent permits and environmental review.
E25. The ODS shall provide a 16-foot wide all-weather access road around the detention basin and to the storm pump station.
E26. The ODS shall provide appropriately-sized utilities, including natural gas and three phase electrical power to the storm pump station. The ODS shall provide an 8-inch waterline connection in Lot 306 and Lot A Park/Open Space that loops the water system between the internal subdivision to the external streets. A 10-foot-wide City water easement shall be dedicated on Lot 306.
E27. The ODS shall construct all sound walls consistent with the noise analysis and original mitigation measures included in the Project EIR.
E28. The ODS shall construct minimum 8' tall masonry walls to enclose the perimeter of the City pumps and controls in the storm pump station.
49 EXHIBIT 1
562
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
E29. The ODS shall construct minimum 6' tall ornamental iron fence, a 6' tall masonry block wall, or a combination of each as well as associated maintenance vehicle access gates along the perimeter of Lot B Basin.
E30. The ODS shall construct a minimum 8' tall masonry wall between Lot 187 and Lot B Basin. Such wall shall be on private property (Lot 187).
E31. The ODS shall provide an8-inchwater line-connection in-Lot-306 and LotA Park/Open Space that loops the water system between the internal subdivision to the external streets. A 10-foot-wide City water easement shall be dedicated on Lot 306.
Easements
E32. Comply with all requirements of agencies having jurisdiction over the Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID). (#25)
E33. The Final Map for Lot 5 shall include a ten (10) foot easement from the existing toe of the levee along Bear Creek for maintenance of all levee slopes. Note: This condition is not required if the easement is already included as a component of another recorded map. (#18
Transportation System Management
E34. The owner/subdivider shall participate in any Transportation Systems Management (TSM) programs established by the City of Stockton and provide a permanent area for a park and ride facility as a part of the development of Lots 1, 2, or 4 as shown on Cannery Park Unit No. 1 Final Map ef---a, or a combination thereof. Lot 17 is considered an interim park & ride location that will eventually be eliminated with the reconstruction of the State Highway Route 99/Eight Mile Road interchange. The Park and Ride facility may be a stand-alone designated lot or may consist of designated spaces within a parking area in the above referenced lots. The required number of park & ride spaces shall be determined by the Public Works Director in consultation with Caltrans. (# 21) Lot 5 is SFR
E35. The ODS shall design and submit offsite improvement plans to the Community Development Department - Engineering Section for approval. Improvement Plans shall include but not be limited to traffic signal modifications, installation of roundabouts, traffic calming devices, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway access, wheelchair ramps, streetlight standards, and public utilities. A Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted with the improvement plans. Offsite improvements shall be constructed per City Standards prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The following on-site/in-tract improvements are necessary to support development within Improvement Plan Area 'E' Lot 5 and Lot 6:
Off-site Improvements
50 EXHIBIT 1
563
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
Other Roadways/Intersections
E36. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 5 (i.e., 20,126), the owner/subdivider of Lot 5 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 41.31 %) of the total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
a. EigntMile-Road/Harntane:-
b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and g. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements).
E37. Based upon the total daily trip generation rate for Cannery Park (i.e., 48,726) compared to the total daily trip generation estimate associated with Lot 6 (i.e., 1,517), the owner/subdivider of Lot 6 shall pay a proportionate share (i.e., 3.11%) of the
total cost of roadway improvements at the following intersections (#13), (#16):
a. Eight Mile Road/Ham Lane;
b. Eight Mile Road/Leach Road;
c. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); d. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements); e. Eight Mile Road/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road at Northbound ramp (interim improvements);
f. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 West Frontage Road (interim improvements); and g. Morada Lane/Hwy 99 East Frontage Road (interim improvements).
Note: If construction occurs in Improvement Plan Area 'E' prior to occurring in improvement Plan Area 'C' or 'D', the following improvement shall occur:
Pfc
Jessie Mizener Street
E38. Access to Pfc Jessie Mizener Street shall be restricted except at public street intersections. (#7)
Eight Mile Road Interchange Frontage Roads
Provide appropriate security, design and construct the following interim improvements to mitigate near-term impacts and enhance circulation.
E39. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road/West Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane 51 EXHIBIT 1
564
EXHIBIT D - Cannery Park Project Amended Conditions
b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane E40. Design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Eight Mile Road/East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the· following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
a. -NB - one left0turn Ian·e ancrorrennrougn/riglit-turn sliarea lane b. SB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane c. EB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane d. WB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane E41. Install stop signs at the intersection of the north bound off-ramp and East Frontage Road and widen the intersection as appropriate, with striping to provide the following lane configurations: (#10), (#13), (#16)
e. NB - one left-turn lane and one through/right-turn shared lane f. SB - one right-lane and one through lane
g. EB - one left-turn lane and one right-turn lane
h. WB- Not applicable
If the owner/subdivider of Lot 5 or Lot 6 constructs the interim improvements identified in D114, D115, and D116, the payment of a proportionate share of the cost of those improvements as defined in D94 and D96 above is not required of owner/subdivider who constructs said improvements.
52 EXHIBIT 1
565
W:.�:;'�ND�!!:::����[BY STATE THAT WE ARE
£
THE PARTIES HAVING RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LANDS
SUBDIVIDrn AND SHOWN ON THIS FINAL MAP
to
11TR/iCT NO. 4214, SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY,
CANNERY PARK, UNIT NO. 15 - VILI.AGE J", Cl OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA AND WE HEREBY CONSENT TO THE
PREPARATION AND FILING OF THIS FINAL MAP IN E OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. '\
WE ALSO OFFER THE REAL PROPERTY 0ESCRIBED B�LOW, DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, ALL PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, SOUND WALL MAINTENAN<!:E EASEMENTS AND ALL STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY. ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS FINAL MAP.
OWNER: CENTURY COMMUNlflES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY NAME'."illa. , ,Ma.
TITLE: ,t,..._ p..,,�e_,\
NOTARY. SIAIEMEN! (O WNEJR):
A NC fFARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLIETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL
WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALl01TY ,OF TI;{A:j 00CUMENT.
STA:E OF . CAUF'f't_
A
�COliJNTY OF r;: -.m, �
)
·
ON l 7 -- rJf: l(, l4 ' 20.li_ ' BEFORE ME, L.. "',s � Ru� � r\$11..., 7!L A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY jpPEARED ----�·--=--..--.------------ DfAI\ t\\.:lls
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO SE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRIJMENT. AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AIJTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT !BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE EN'l'ITY liJPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENtibTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS • • • -RRECT.
·-
li3ENEEICIARY'S $JAtEMENT:
COMMISSION NUMBER: �J.._'1_fl_2
,,---
6_ki _____ _
MY coMMIss10N EXPIRES: 2 /,s I 1., Lt
JEN CALIFORNIA 31 LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMlfED LIABILITY COMPANY, BENEFICIARY UNDER ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS R[CORDED MAY 20, 2025, AS DOCUMENT NO. 2025-042435 OF omCIAL RECORDS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, HERf'l3�§ENTS TO THE MAKING AND FILING OF THIS MAP. :�,�c ,111-r
ITS: ftcc. lMidrMt::
NOTARY SIAIE!Ml2NJ {E,lENEFICltsRY):
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL
WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY .OF THAT DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CAL@!_ R�N� ,Aft COUNTY OF �
ON j'-1 \I , 2oi1/[_ , BEFORE ME, ,,..,,. '1wl&.-1e-tr£' A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED � M »ILJ
WHO PROVED TO ME ON lHE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVl0ENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE Wl™IN INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN
HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UND[R PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
WITNESS t.lY HAND
SIGNATURE:�&..�• if� COMMISSION NUMBER: iil::t\tta.
PRINTED 'NAME: &-,tn kltn� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ""• .. I ao-= PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS: ..,PlltMi''-'·_.. =------------------ W: :. f� l.JNIT Hi ,{ VI!-� J-Sht 1.dw kshaht/az 7 15 25 8:16 TRACT NO. 4214
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
CA1NNERY PARK
U1N:IT N·O. 15 - VILLAGE J
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT C AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTffLED "TRACT NO. 4213, CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 14 - VILLAGE 111 FILED IN BOOK ___ OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE --�
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN,
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
JULY 2025
430 10th Street
Modesto, CA 95354
Tel: 209.568.4477 Fax: 209.568.4478
EIGHT
i3 8:
z0
z ::,
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT:
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
N
00 THIS IS TO STATE THAT AT ITS REGULARLY HELD MEETING ON THE __ DAY OF,,..,.,....,.,..,.---� 202_, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA PER COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. _____ _ APPROVED THIS FINAL MAP OF "TRACT NO. 4214, SUIBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CANNERY PARK, UNIT NO. 15 - VILLAGE J", CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, AND ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC FOR PUIBLIC USE THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF ALL PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AND SOUND WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS. ALL AS
SHOWN ON THIS FINAL MAP, AND ACCEPTED THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF ALL STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY SUBJECT TO
SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS THEREON OF SAID STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 16, ARTICLE 6 OF THE STOCKTON MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVIE MAP.
DATED THIS __ DAY OF __________ , 202_ .
KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
CITY CLERK
THIS FINAL MAP IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT RECORDED ON ____ _ 20_ , AS DOCUMENT NO. ________ , SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS.
D.D. SHEET NO. 28
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THt: RtQIJEST OF JIM BREOl'IER ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL THE MONIJMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSmONS BEFORE DECEMBER :31, 2026, AND THAT THE MONUME:NTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABI.E THE SURVEY 1'0 BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVIE lilAP.
DATED '"" �, ,,,
v�
RYAN VANCE�
, 202.r.
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:
I, ERIC ALVAREZ, HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, AND THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS FINAL MAP OF "TRACT NO. 4214, SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CANNERY PARK, UNIT NO. 15 - VILLAGE J", CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA AND THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP, AND ANY APPR©VIED ALTERATIONS THEREOF. I FURTHER STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP COMPLIES WITH ALL l'HE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 16, ARTICLE 6 OF THE STOCKTON MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP.
OF STOCKT
REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2026
COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STA TEMENT:
NO. C0$783G
I, JAMES E. HART, HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS FINAL MAP OF "TRACT NO. 4214, SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CANNERY PARK, UNIT NO. 15 - VILLAGE J", CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA AND THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON COMPLIES WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, AS AMENDED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. 1'+
DATED THIS 2. '+ DAY OF -�J�LJ-�_:'f�---- , 202 S"'.
�11¥11> l: 1(/.4t0t Olflr_s E. HART, L.S. 8657
COUNTY SURVEYOR
BECQRD,ER'S STATEMENT:
FILED THIS ____ DAY OF _________ , 2 02_ , AT __ .M.
LICENSE No. 8657
IN BOOK ____ OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE _____ , AT THE REQUEST OF VV1H CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
FEE$ _ __ _
STEVE J. BESTOLARIDES
ASSESSOR-RECORDER-COUNTY CLERK
BY: _ _____________ _
ASSISTANT /DEPUTY RECORDER
SHEET 1 OF 8
EXHIBIT 2
566
SECTION LINE
NOTES:
' '
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE MEASURED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. A 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS DEDICATED ALONG ALL STREETS AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP.
3. SET A WITNESS CORNER CUT "+" JN CONCRETE ON PROJECTION OF ALL LOT LINES INTO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 1 FOOT, WITNESS CORNER SET RADIALLY OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT ALL CURVE AND RETURN POINTS.
4. EACH lOT SHALL BE DESIGNED, GRADED AND MAINTAINED TO PROVIDE PROPER
DRAINAGE WITHOUT PONDING, CAUSING SOIL EROSION OR DRAINING ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY. ALL LOTS ARE TO DRAIN FROM REAR TO FRONT UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
5. llHIS. MAP REFERS TO APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP TMB-04, AMENDED BY THE CITY OF 'STOCKTON •RESOLUTION NO. 2024-02-08-05001-05, ON FEBRUARY B, 2024.
6. ALL REFERENCES ARE TO SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS AND BOOK OR VOLUME PRECEDES PAGE.
7. BY THIS NOTE, ACCESS RIGHTS TO CORNER LOTS ARE RESTRICTED IN CON�ORMANCE WITH STOCKTON MUNICIPAL CODE 16.36.030. FURTHER, THE DEVElLOPER OF THE SUBDIVISION SHALL SELECT THE STREETS ABUTTING THE CORlilER LOTS UPON WHICH ACCESS IS TO BE PROVIDED AND ACCESS IS HEREBY RESTRICTED ON ALL OTHER FRONTAGES.
8. THE 96-FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT CREATED BY 24-PM-105, TO BE ABANDONED BY THIS MAP.
W\ 10810300\survey\DRAWING\SHEET FILES\FM UNIT 15 J\Vll.L J-Sht 2.dw9 kshahbaz 7 /16(25 12:00 REFERENCES:
• (R1) CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 1, BOOK 40 OF MAPS & PLATS, PAGE 51, S.J.C.R. (R2) BOOK 35 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 5, S.J.C.R. CITY OF STOCKTON TRAVERSE CONTROL SURVEY.
(R3) CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 14 - VILLAGE I, BOOK __ O.F MAPS & PLATS, PAGE� S.J.C.R. (R4) BOOK 24 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 105, S.J.C.R.
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
BEARINGS, DISTANCES, AND COORDINATES ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM-83, ZONE 3, (1991.35). A LINE BETWEEN CITY OF STOCKTON MONUMENTS NO. 9N-14 (291} AND 9N-18 (295) BEARS S73
°32'17"E AS
CALCULATED FROM CITY OF STOCKTON TRAVERSE CONTROL MONUMENT SURVEY • FILED FOR RECOR!) IN BOOK 35 OF SURVEYS, AT PAGE 5, SAN JOAQUIN COUN1'f RECORDS. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND LEVEL AND MUST BE MULTIPLIED BY
0.99994647 TO OBTAIN GRID DISTANCES. 400
SHEET INDEX:
SHEET 1: CERTIFICATES.
FD. CHISELED "+" C.O.S.
MON 9N-18 (295) (R2)
N=2.206903.3B
E=6342976.01
SHEET 2: NOTES, LEGEND, REFERENCES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS.
SHEET 3: KEYNOTE VILLAGE J UNIT 15
SHEET 4: BOUNDARY AND LEGEND.
SHEET 5: LOT DETAILS.
SHEET 6: LOT DETAILS.
SHEET 7: LOT DETAILS.
SHEET 8: LOT DETAILS AND CURVE TABLES.
N
(f}
200 0 400 800
SCALE: 1" = 400'
TRACT NO. 4214
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN CO.UNTY
CAN·NE.RY PAR:K
UNIT NO. 15 - VIL�G� f
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT C AS SHOWN ON THE MAP Ei il'ITI.JtU "TRACT NO. 4213, CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 14 - VILLA! I[ 1 11 FILED IN BOOK ___ OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE ..;;;·• �_., SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION il
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT 011\l!BLO MERIDJIAN, CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALlfORN •
LEGEND:
-@-
-@-
-0-
-@-
3'6
W.C. 1
:.0:
'////ft/////
&
SJCR
RS
Pt.1
(t.1}
PUE
C99
L99
(R)
WC
DN
SF
AC
t.1.&P.
FD
SFN
SME
RD
IP
MON
EX
JULY, 2025
CONSLLTI\IG·�
430 1 oth Street
Mo<lesto, CA 95354
Tel: 209. 568.4477 Fax: 209.568.4478
i
FOUND AND ACCEPTED 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGE0 LS. 6953 PER (R1� UNL.tSS NOTED OTHERWISE.
FOUND Cl'TY OF STOCKTON CONTROL MONUMENT, /6 NOTrn PER (R 'R2}, FOUND AND ACCEPTED 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGE0 LS. 6953 IN MONU1 li!NT WELL PER (R1} UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
SET 3/ 4" x 3011 LONG IRON PIPE TAGGED LS. 8225.
SET 3/4" x 30" LONG IRON PIPE TAGGED L.S. 8225 IN MONUMENT' SET 1/211 X 2411 LONG IRON PIPE TAGGED L.S. 8225 AT ALL REAR' ,.J CORNERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
WITNESS CORNER: SET 1/211><2411 LQNG IRON PIPE TAGGED L.S. ' '225 AT OFFSET NOTED, ALL LOT !DIMENSIONS SHOWN ALONG LOT LINES ,HA CONl'AJN A WITNESS CORNER ARE FROM THE LOi' CORNER TO LOT CORNER.
MEASURE POINT
EXISTING RESl'RICTED ACCESS. ACCESS RIGHTS RELINQUISHEQ TO TH STOCKTON (R1)
ACCESS RIGHTS RELINQUISHED TO THE CITY OF' STOCKTON BY Tl'IIS
CENTERLINE GRID COORDINATE NUMBERS
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECOROS
RECORD OF SURVEY
PARCEL MAP
MEASURED ON THIS MAP
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
CURVE DATA TABLE REFERENCE
LINE DATA TABLE REFERENCE
RADIAL BEAR! NG
WITNESS CORNER
DOCUMENT NUMBER
SQUARE FEET
ACRE
MAPS AND PLATS
FOUND
SEARCHED, FOUND NOTHING
SOUND WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
ROAD
IRON PIPE
MONIJMENT
EXISTING
N=2153535.135 CALIF. COORDINATES-83, ZONE 3
E=6327497.231 (CENTERLINE AND CONTROL MONUMENTS}
EXHIBIT 2
567
150 75
N
ffi
0 150
SCALE: 1" = 150'
KEY PLAN
300
----------- ......
----
I
--7
__ _J
I
---I
I--7
I
\
\
I \
I \ \ \ i 5
t;
I I I \
I I I \ \ ;
,,,
-1r--f-� 1.l-- r t;; i5 z
0 �
I I I I I )
I I I
I I I
0::: 1------2::::a.�-----------..,Q:; w
(!)
0 ii:
0 0
0 �
I r---
L __ _
I
1----
1 r---
1 LOT B
(R3l
I I I
I I I
_I _I_ I_ I _ I _ I _I _I_ I_ I _ I _ I _I _I_ I_
I • • CANNERY PARK • I
I UNIT NO. 14 - VILLAGE l (
1 R3l 1
1 I I I I I I I I
LOT C (R3l
CANNERY PARK
UNIT NO. 15 -VILLAGE J
FOR DETAILS SEE
SHEETS 4- 8
I ---i---
___ 1 __ _
I ---1---
1 ---1---
1 ---1---
1 ___ I ___
___ I __ _
I
I ---i---
___ l __ _
I
---1---
1 ---1---
1 ---1---
1 ___ I ___
___ I __ _
I
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
' '
Cl
0 ex::
UJ
�I-
z 0 a: LL
Q)
a>
cx:: 0 %
�
z w I-
:::> 0 ex::
�
3: ::c
(!)
:i:
UJ
�I-
TRACT NO. 4214
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
CA:NNEiRY PAR:K
UNIT :NO. 15 • Vl·LLAG1E J--================-i
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT C AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENT! LED "TRACT NO. 4213, CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 14 - VILLAGE I'�. FILED IN BOOK ___ OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE --�
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SEC"J'ilON 1,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MEJUD :N,
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFO�NIA .
JULY, 2025
CONSLLTI\G Bl'8\EEFIB
430 1 0th Street
Modesto, CA 95354
Tel: 209.568.4477 Fax: 209.568.4478
NOTE:
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS,
NOTES, REFERENCES AND LEGEND.
EXHIBIT 2
568
CURVE DATA TABLE
CURVE DELTA RADIUS
C1 3°07136'11 723.00'
C2 . ·21 ° 3715311 943.001
C3 24°24'5·6" 277.00'
C4 · 3
°51128"11 90.00'
C5 • 36°07'4711 64.00'
cs 23° 52·! 50 II 377.001
C111 12°3210211 750.001
C112 23°52'50 11 250.001
LINE DATA TABLE
Llt'JE BEARING DISTANCE
L1 N33° 17' 161 1W 54.00'
L2 N52°3014311E 60.021
L3 N16° 43152'"E 20.781
L4 soO001oo"E 9.241
L5 N45°00100''E 14.141
L6 S45°0G'OOuE 14.141
L7 N90°0010011w 54.001
LB N45°001-00'"E 14.141
L9 S·45° 00' 0011 E 14.141
L 10 N45°0010011w 14.141
L 11 N90°0010011w 54.00'
L12 N4sOoo'oo"E 14.141
L13 S45°oo•·oo"E 14.141
L14 N90°00100·11w 54.00 1
L15 N45°00'00 11E 14.141
L16 N9oO0010011E 90.00'
LENGTH
39.451
356.021
118.04'
6.06'
40.361
157.131
164.071
104.201
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(Mj_(R3
°(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
(M)(R3)
CH.BEARING CHORD
N55°oa'56"E 39.451 (M)(R3)
N42°4611111E 353.911
(M)(R3)
N44°09'4311E 117.15' (M)(R3)
N54°26127"E 6.06 1
(M)(R3)
N70°34'3611E 39.69' (M)(R3)
N11°5s12511w 156.001
(M)(R3)
N59°51109"E 163.741 (M}(R3)
N11•55'25"W 103.451
(M)(R3)
132
133
108 b'.1-----+-1
w 'z
,�
I :I:
Ii
I
124
123
122
121
120
L13
119
113
114
115
1 1 6
117
L12
118
76 92 75
101 93 74
53 ,
1 46 . . . \
100 50
37 L----SEE SHEET 6----1L---T1
\ \ 69
I
70 71
'
38 CANN
UNIT NO. 14
I
I
/
45 44
43 37
ARK £RY P
- VIL I
11-
ltl:l a:::
l-
1CI.>
I! 1c§
I>-
LAGE I (R3l
38 39
40 '
22 0 100
SCALE: 1" = 100'
3 2
Q)
O'>
0 z w I:>
0ex:
1'.I
7x, 0
�
�
I
C)
I
�
�
200
1-1------�
0 I 20 <{
I
0 0::
�
lw z
IZ 0
1:3
0::
0)
I ::, :x:
Ii
I-0::
·� Q
i 3::
z
TRACT NO. 4214
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
CANN:ERY PARK
UNIT N1O. 15 -
VllLAG J
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT C AS SHOWN ON THE M:<t EITTITLEl!J "TRACT NO. 4213, CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 14 - vJ llAGI 1 11 FILED IN BOOK __ OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAO
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTI '1 1,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO ERll:>IAN, CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CAUF' �NIA
JULY, 2025
430 1 0th Street
Modesto, CA 95354
Tel: 209.568.4477 Fax: 209.568.4478 •
SUBDIVISION SUMMARY:
136 LOTS (RESIDENTIAL) = 736,9'26 S.f. = T6.92 A
STREET R/W DEDICATION 259,356 S.F. = 5.95 A
TOTAL = 996,282 S.F. = 22.87 A
NOTE:
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS,
NOTES, REFERENCES AND LEGEND.
MONUMENT NOTE:
0 POUND 3/4" IRON 1'11PE TAGGED L.S. 8225 PER (R3).
CENTERLINE GRID
COORDINATES
CENTERLINE G"
COORDINATE
Point # NORTHING EASTING Point # NORTHING
20 2207011.56 6 ;2797.76
1 2206913.33 6341780.75 21 2207414.11 6 li696.39
2 2207061.73 6341731.94 22 2207884.8'3 6 .!443.26
3 2207167.45 6341653.96 23 2207848.54 6 2375.78
4 2207113.29 6341580.54 24 2207760.67 6 ;i28{t06
5 2207318.22 6341858.35 25 2207410.08 6 f982.87
6 2207210.18 6341938.05 26 2207677.30 6 '2230 .• 06
7 2207180.18 6341957.05 27 2206878.49 6, 2797.76
8 2207091.14 6342004.92 28 22068'7'8.49 6 2'543.77
9 2206972.74 6342034.74 29 220687!!.49 6' •t2a·&12
10 2207013.54 6342288.72 30 2206664.50 6 '228'&72
11 2207175.50 6342247.94 31 2206664.50 _. ·5, Z034,.74
12 2207363.47 6342146.86 32 2206664.50 6· 178tl.75
13 2207412.95 6342111.92 33 2206664.50 6 t5!6.77
14 2207471.94 6342058.46 34 2206779:85 6 1526.77
15 2207658.70 6342218.17 35 22068'81.05 6 1505.37
16 2207634.41 6342255.21 36 2207031.06 6 1438',95
17 2207543.77 6342338.28 4© 220666'4.50 6 41394.91
18 2207293.82 6342472.70
19 2207011.56 6342543.77
(R3)
(R3)
(R3)
'(R3)
(R3)
:(R3)
(R.3}
�R3)
(R3)
(R3)
(R3)
EXHIBIT 2
569
\
111
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ I \
11 0
�bl
i.::: :s � -I>-5 108
1 � l
I Z "<t
131
8292 SF
133
4860 SF
128
6150 SF
\
\
\
\
\
126
6039 SF
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
110
5942 SF
111
6637 SF
\
\
\
\
\
\
106
\
\
\
\
105
i\(101 PUE \
I I
I
;1
\ \ \
I I I I I
I I I I � I "' I
I I I
125
6057 SF
124
6061 SF
112
7649 SF
I I I I I ()
\ \� I I
\ \
I I
1-----------..:.4:.:a.2"'6�!
:
, ......
, 27' .rt,N90°0010011E 104.06'
q 1-
t :: I g
I t_::: 113 liti
4591 SF : ..,. 1
N!!8°02125"E(R) 100.00' 2.74
1 : I N0° 581 48 "W
12.891 10.161 N90°00'00"W 100.171
I I
271 (
C24
I I I •
34.84' 123
4602 SF �, vvh-survey : 2 5
4501 SF
l-I
I 18I iti 1
LU
i .... I
a0
N90°00'00"E 100.00
1 122
4500 SF
N90°00'00"E 100.00'
115
4500 SF
a <DONui ...:.... r---C\J
Lw
�t-�---0--,--------+------------..._�oo � N90 00 00''E 1 DO.OD' N90°00'00"E 100.00' tQ � 0 I
'°I "! I
�I
!1
fl
PUE 104
6235 SF
\
\
\
\
\
() \
�\ \ I I I
I I ..,. I ..., I u II I
103
6827 SF
102
4944 SF
88 ) 1 00.00'
4.26'
101
4902 SF
4.261
\
\
\
\
\
89 \
\
\
\
\
91 N9° 42'50" W
24. 40'
N6°2511511 W
18.931
N2°29'28"W
32.771
92 93
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I
I I
TRACT NO. 4214
SUBDIVISIONS or SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
CANN'EAY PARK
'UNIT NO. 15 - VILLAG
\
\
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT C A$ SHOWN
THE MAP ENTITLED "TRACT NO. 4213, CAN
PARK UNIT NO. 14 - VILLAGE 111 FIi.ED IN
\
OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RE:'CORDS, LYING I
SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6
MOUNT DIABLO MER•IDIAN,
\
I
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUN
CALIFORNIA
JULY, 2025
\ • . . •.
I
\ I
I I
t
Tel:
430 10th Street
Modesto, 0A 95354
209.568.4 477 Fax: 20!l.568. 4 a
N
27' I N90°00'0011E 100.00' (0 __________ _._--1 I ffi
�
I -o I-LUal9 I 100 '.;l LU
�: 4500SF ..,.D5 I LU t--;1------------:::--1 LU
N90°00'00"E 100.00' CD Cl)I I - I01q i
�II I
99 4500 SF
g
iti -
.... 00,...;
I")
a::: .._..., 1-------------1
Cl I N90°0_010011E 100.001
LU I > - - IIJJ CG o Il;,"!'.;l1 r--- ..,. I N I I
98 4500 SF
t-..._ ________ _ 00 N90°0010011E 100.00'
94 N90° 00 I OO"W
54 154.00'(M)(R3)
I I I I I I
I I I I f---
40 20 0 40
SCALE: l" = 40'
NOTE:
1. SEE SHEET 2 FO R BASIS OF 8 • , • GS,
J
80 \ 3-1U . I 0--------700 �1
;1
z
� No
00 I_ 0
8 ca 8 b
0 �i
0 I0 - Ib �I
w > a::: Cl
..J..J
NOTES, RffERE'NC.:S ANO l.EGfi:N .
2. SEE NOlE 7 SHEET 2 FOR THI$ BOL & ;
•
I I I I I I I I I I I
z <.)
I:::
107
134
4568 SF
81 �I ZI
<(
.I.LI
<(
0 w lO ....
121 iti ru 116 iti Z
4500 SF ..,. "' 4500 SF ..,. 0 • 0 8 0 ' ot--+-----------_.o ___________ ,-.....1 '6 N90°00'00"E 100.001
h z (I)
a 0iti ....
a 0iti
N90°00'00"E 1 OD.DO'
117
I I 1-
18I •"'
4500 SF 1 ..,.
I
I I
I I
Z "' I ..,. I I I
I I I
97 4500 SF
N90°00'00"E 1 OD.OD'
al 9 I 96 �1• 4500SF
1-.;I----------� �
120
4500 SF
PUE 1 0' PUE ___,,/iI I
�10' l"UEI I
I I
I I I I I �
106
o�------------,-i
9 � N90°00'00"E 100.001 1
1 N90°0010011E 100.00' N90°00'00"E 100.001
o�
po� A : a - : A 118 A
UJ co 136 I q 8 I 119 a • 8
I
I ro g 5150 SF I � 1 N I 5150 SF o 5150 SF N
� N45000'00"E I J l l .... : S45000'00"E � N45000'00"E I .... J l I l�---------------- __ ----____ �
4 _:_
1 �,���
R
=)�
1 . 27.001 27.001 '- 14.14�(M}(R3l ___ ----_ --j_ --____ -- 14.14'(M)(R3)...,. 27.001 27.001 1 N90°00'00"E 100.001
- : ..
81 NI
95 5150 SF
..,. : S45°00'00"E
-...!1:!.4�(�l(fi3l _______ _
54.00'(M)(R3) 90.QO' . ) 90.00' . 54.00'(M)(R3) ___________ ..;.i._N_9 _0�0 0-0�'0-0�" -W_ 9_0_.0_0�'(�M�)(-R�3) _ _, N!l0°00'00"W N90°00 100 11 W 180.00'(M)(R3) N90°00'00"W N90°00
1 0011E 90.00'(M)(R."5)
0 0
�
I I I I
57 I
a I
o I
� I
')---------------�)
�
�
t:; ggl O'CONNOR t:;
ggi
t:;
O'CONNOR STREET
=1
1 --'(j· •!l:::::=:
- __ _ _ _ __ _ ___ 254.00'(M)(R3) _____________ �:;, • _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ 254.00'(M)(R3) _____________ �:;, • _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ 254.00'(M)(R3) _ ___ __ _ __ _ • N90°0010011E 762.00'(M)(R3)
3. SEE CU RVE TABLE ON SHEET 8 .
MONUMENT NQIE:
CD FOUND 3/4
11 IRON l"IPE TAGGED LS.
PE R (R3).
25 SHEET 5
EXHIBIT 2
570
TRACT NO. 4214
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
CA:NNERY PARK
1UNIT NO. 15 - VILLAG'E J
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT C AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED ''TRACT NO. 4213, CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 14 - VILLAGE 1 11 FILED IN BOOK ___ OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE _ _,
LO
1-
w w
:c
(f)
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 1,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN,
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
JULY, 2025
103
102
c::cJNSU..TII\IG EN3II\EERS
430 1 0th Street
Modesto, CA 95354
Tel: 209.568.4477 Fax: 209.568.4478
N9°42'50"W
24.401
\ \ \ \
90 5383 SF
WI __ --:;;:;;:-;.::::-1
-�- N6°25'15"W
18.931
101
100
99 54
N
ffi
40 20 0 40 80
SCALE: l" = 40'
NOTE:
1. SEE SHEET 2 FOR li!ASIS OF BEARINGS,
NOTES, REFERENCES AND LEGEND.
2. SEE NOTE 7 SHEET 2 FOR THIS SYMBOL ,A.
3. SEE CURVE TAlilLE ON SHEET 8.
MONUMENT NOTE:
G) FOUND 3/411 IRON PIPE TAGGED LS. 8225 PER (R3).
\
\
65 \
I \
\
\
\
\
\
\
51 \ \
50 \ I \ \
48 4706 SF
\
\
\
\
\
\
31 5500 SF'
\
\
\
\
\
S26° 11 I 11 "E
57.481
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ \
\ <& , ·a\ o ...
\
\ \
\
\
\
33 4751 SF
34 4749 SF
\
35 \ \
4748 SF
S14°17'43"E
23.60'
I 1"'N\\lf.1
516
018 '2.
S1°24'14"E
35.43'
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ \ \
39 \ \ \ \
1 O'
4701 SF
\
0 \ 0
I c,,_
I - 0
I g -"'"::
I £
I
I
I
I
PUE--,
I
I
I
I
I
9.08' •
,,,
�0
1 1
5561 SF
10 4603 SF
31 w.c.
(TYP.)
9 4676 SF
\
I w
\ �
LU
I LU
z
�
0 27'
8 4812 SF
7 4665 SF
891
__ -:-:;; 11cl\l.) 98 • o,e,'0'2. c.\
t\18 31 SME (R1)
6 4567 SF
5 4589 SF
4 4706 SF
I N86
055'26"1::(R) 101.so'
\---10' PUE
o I 3
� 1 4750 SF o,
I N89° 47'37"E(R) I ---------
N90°00'00"E 102.51'
2 4662 SF'
z
0 ;x:J-'I:c
�
iP .0 z -'I )> Gl·m
i
SHEET 6 _,1F 8
EXHIBIT 2
571
TRACT NO. 4214
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
CANNERY PARK
UNilT NO. 15 - VILLAGE J
ll!EING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT C AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED "TRACT NO. 4213, CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 14 - VILLAGE 1 11 \
FILED IN BOOK ___ OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE __ .,
\
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 1,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN,
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
JULY, 2025
\
\
\
Cl:INSLLTII\G EN31N£AS
Tel:
430 1 0th Street
Modesto, CA 95354
209.568.4477 Fox: 209.568.4478
NOTE:
1. SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS,
NOTES, REFERENCES AND LEGEND.
2. SEE NOTE 7 SHEET 2 FOR THIS SYMBOL .A.
3. SEE CURVE TABLE ON SHEET 8.
MONUMENT NOTE:
(D FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS. 8225 PER (R3).
\
\
\
127
N35° 16'58"W
14.89'
40 20 0
N
m w
SCALE: 1" = 40'
40 80
88 5500 SF
83 6660 SF
PUE
\
\
\
\
\
90 \ \
82 6044 SF
\
\ \ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
81 6006 SF
\
\ \
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
I
I
I
I
I
I...__ ' ' ' ' '
80 6006 SF
'
58 ' ' ' ' ' ' \ \
62 5500 SF
\
\
\
63 5500 SF
79 N25°29 1
6183 SF
56 6097 SF
PUE
\
55 5500 SF
\
\
\
\
\
25 54
5500 SF
PUE 53
5500 SF
\
\
\
\
\
'1,- \ ·a, \ v, \
\
27 52
5500 SF
\
,,� ,<j'l:
0 ��
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
28 \
\
\
c,'o\
64 5500 SF
\
\
\
\
\
65 5676 SF
\
\
\
\
\ \ \
68 \
\
\
\
\
'1,- \
I I I I
·a , v, \
I I I I I I I
\
I I I
\
\
51 5500 SF
3'
\ \ \ \ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
29 \ I I I I I I
.\ I
\
\
\
I I I
I I I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ \
31 47
46 SHE1ET
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ \
\
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
Of 8
EXHIBIT 2
572
/y
{?\
�L....--
2�◊--◊
.__ _
__
_
4�o _____ao
V SCALE:]"= 40'
NOTE:
1, SElE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF ffiEARINGS,
NG:J'.ES, REFERENCES AND LEGEND.
2. SEil: NOTE 7 SHEET 2 FOR THIS SYMBOL
3. SE[ CURVE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. .A.
4. F'OR L3, L2, C2, C3, C4, AND C5, SEE
0AtA TABLES SHOWN ON SHEET 4 OF 8.
MOJ'il.UMENT fl;l0TE:
CD FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGED
LS. 8225 PER (R3).
c,'!-
.,,,,,,-,
.,.,,,,,,..
,,,
\
.,,, \ ,' \
\
I
I
I I \
CURVE DATA TABLE
CURVE DELTA
C103 2°48'28"
C104 3°3110311
C105
C106 3°31 '03"
C107 3
°3110211
ClOB 3°31103"
C109 3
°31 '03"
Cl lO 4°2112311
RADIUS LENGTH
823.00' 40.33'
823.00' 50.531
823.001 50.521
823.001 50.531
823.001 50.52'
823.001 50.53'
823.00' 50.53'
823.001 62.571
CH.BEARING
N1°24114"W
N4°
33'59"W
N8°05102"w
Nl 1 ° 36 10511W
Nl 5°0710811W
N1B
0 3B'1111w
N22
°0911411W
s2s005'27"E
CHORD
40.331
50.52 1
50.521
50.52'
50.521
50.52'
50.52'
62.56'
Cl 11 12°32102" 750.00' 164.07' N59°51 '09''E 163.741
TRACT NO. 4214
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
•
1 CANNERY :PARK
UNIT NiO. 15 - VILLAGE J
Ss
0 ,,;
I()
0 0
,,;
S61 ° 4315211W 100.00' I
I
10 1
PUE�_
10 I C!
I :g
I
I
I
r--
1-w
--------�-1'-· ___ S_6 _1°_ 4_3_•5-2 -"w-,-o-o -.o-o-• _ _,i f----1
Cl) I
LU I
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT C AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED "T�CT NO. 4213, CANNERY PARK UNIT NO. 14 - VILLAGE 1 11 FILED IN lrlOOK -�- OF MAPS AND PLATS, AT PAGE __ __,
IJ.I I -
ii,8 > 1
1� . S:�,;:o I()
� "'i.v I LO
S,c- I
I
I
I SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 1,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN,
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
JULY, 2025
a::::INESLLTII\IG.EN:31N.£.I IS
430 1 0th Street
Modesto, CA 95354
Tel: 209.568.4477 Fax: 209.568.4478
s,
S61 ° 43'52"W 100.00' I
I
SEE SHEET6
o I o .J7 I
�) l
----------P�2n_9�7;,-,------75;_5;;;ov,•t: ==I•) 27'
I
I
I
I
10 I ;:
I (.)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
�
..=,,.,
Lu
00 0
7o
N
Cf)
I
�01
T
27 •
I
I
I
I
al 01
,ri I
otl I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- I
OI
C! I
otl I
otl I
I
I
I
N61°43'52"E 102.111
N61°43'52"E 102.11'
N61 ° 43'52"E 102.11 1
N61°43'52"E 102.111
a· 0
�
I
:
31 SME (Rl)---;:J
_ I o o I J o C? I I:- > ·'°'
!Q I
I
"6;,, V "? ., " S,c- '
I I I
I ss1•43'52"w 102.111
. . - I
( �: ; NI t0 I •
-� I S.> l,? t:'.i
I lo 'I?
�: s,,- ;I
0 I
CURVE
C7
CB
C9
ClO
Cl 1
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
ClB
C19
C20
C21
C22
C23
C24
C25
C26
C27
C28
C29
C30
C31
C32
C33
C34
C35
C36
C37
C38
C39
C40
C41
C42
C43
C44
C45
C46
C47
C48
C49
C50
C51
C52
C5:3
C54
I N63°22'32"E(R) 101.991
,-J------=--::.::.::.....:.:.:.:.:.:_ __ 61,•
t--
N22°0415011W
!
/:J 4.921
CURVE TABLES
DELTA
CURVE DATA TABLE
RADIUS LENGTH CH.BEARING CHORD
1° 18'5o" 377.oo' 8.65' ' so• 39'25"E 8.65 1
6°52100" 377.001 45.181 S4°44'50"E 45.15'
6°59'1611 377.00' 45.98' S11°40128"E 45.95'
7°36146 11 377.00' 50.09' N18°58129"W 50.05'
1°05'58" 377.0o' 7.23' s23•19'51"E 7.24'
3•0713511 777.oo' 42.40' S55°0B'5s"w 42.40'
3°07'36" 750.oo' 40.93' N55°
08'56"E 40.92'
3°1413711 223.001 12.621 N34°4713311W 12.621
23°4910511 223.00' 92.701 N21°15142"W 92.04'
9°2111011 223.001 36.411 S4°40'3511E 36.361
36°24 15211 223.00 1 141.731 N18°1212611W 139.35'
36°24152" 260.00' 158.891 N18° 1212611W 156.231
36°2415211 277.00' 176.05' N18°12'26"W 173.10'
2°
28153" 277.00' 12.00' S35°10'25"E 12.00'
10°3912811 277.00' 51.53' S28°36'15"E 51.45'
10°3912811 277.00' 51.531 S17°5614711E 51.45'
10°39'28" 277.00' 51.53' S7°17119"E 51.45'
1•57'35" 211.00' 9.46' so
05B'4B"E 9.47'
s008'44" 250.00' 35.54' N32°20'3o"w 35.511
28° 1 s'o8" 250.00' 123.35' Nl 4•oe'o4"w 122.1 o'
s•oe'44" 223.oo' 31.101 N32°2013o"w 31.68'
5°3510811 223.00' 21.741 N33°37'1811W 21.73'
2°3313611 223.00' 9.96' N29°32'56"W 9.96'
2a01s'o8" 223.oo' 110.02' N14°08'04"W 108.911
5°2513811 223,00' 21-121 N25°3311911W 21.111
22°
5013011 223.00' 88.901 N11°25'15"W 88.31'
28° 1610811 277 .001 136.67' Nl 4°0810411W 135.291
7°5113411 277.00' 38.001 S3°5514711 [ 37.97'
8°40'52" 211.00' 41.97' s12°121oo"E 41.93'
11°43142" 277.00' 56.70' S22°24'17"E 56.60'
8°08'44" 2n.001 39.38' N32°20'3o"w 39.35'
4°51104" 277.00' 23.45' S30°41'40"E 23.45'
3°1714011 277.00' 15.93' S34
°46'02"E 15.93'
3°38'44" 997.oo' 63.44' s51•45'4s"w 63.43'
13°5510411 250.00' 60.731 N35°1314011W 60.58'
28°1610811 342.00' 168.741 N14°08104"W 167.03'
13°5510411 223.00' 54.17' N35°13'40"W 54.04'
3°05'23" 223.00' 12.03' N40° 38131 ''W 12.02'
10°49141" 223.00' 42.141 N33°4015911W 42.081
13°5510411 277.001 67.291 N35°13140"W 67.121
1°3514611 277.00' 7.721 S41°23'19"E 7.72'
11 °3510911 277.00' 56,01' S34° 47151 "E 55.92'
0•4410111 277.16' 3.56' s2B038'12"E 3.56'
3°2310311 369.00' 21.80' S26
°34'36"E 21.79'
6°37141" 369.00' 42.69' S21°3411411E 42.661
6°37'4111 369.00' 42.69' S14
°56'33"E 42.66'
6°37'41" 369.oo' 42.69' se018152"E 42.66'
5°00102" 369.00' 32.19' S2°30101 "E 32.19'
CURVE DATA TABLE
CURVE DELTA RADIUS . LENGTH. CH.BEARING
C55 9°3114611 315.00' 52.39' N4°45'·5:3''W '�.:33'
C56 10°4712911 315.001 59.331 N14°55'30"W' .':, ,,241
1-----11------+----+----11-------'<J;---· -
C57 7°56153" 315,00' 43.70' N24°17'4211W :66'
C58 5°09'0411 997.oo' 89,63' S43°o6'41 ''w .. so'
l-----ll------+----+--�1-------<1"--· ,____
C59 5°0910511
C60 5° 46'20''
C61 14°33119"
C62 1°1811411
c63 2s02e'23''
C64 2s028'23"
C65 17°00'01"
C66 11 °28122"
C67 2°
26'30''
C68 5°2215711
069 5°2215811
C70 5°2215811
C71 5°2215711
C72 4°1714811
C73 3° 12103 11
C74 4°00135"
C75 4°00'35"
C76 4°
00'36"
C77 4°00135"
C78 4
°0013511
C79 5°0110911
CBO 9
°2314411
C81 10°36'3811
C82 e
0 28'0111
CB3 28°2e'23"
C84 9°3115611
C85 20°1414111
C86 29°4613711
C87 29°4613711
CB8 108°2s'1e11
089 47°54 12111
C90 24°24111"
C91 9° 13109"
C92 1°38140"
C93 3°25 139 11
C94 2
°
52 128 11
C95 2°52128"
C96 2°52 °28 11
C97 2°52 127 11
C98 2°52 12811
C99 2°52 12811
ClOO 2°52 12811
C101 2°52'11 11
C102 0°12123"
9·97_00 1 89.64' s31°57'37"W ,60 1
970.00 1 97.721 N50°41 158"E , .68'
970.00' · 246.42 1 N40°32'09"E
97ll.OO' 22.07' N32° 36'2:i!'"E
250.001 124.241 N42°3012011W
223.00 1 110:82' N42°30'2011w
223.00' 66.17' N48° 14'30"W
223.oo' 44.65' N34
°oo' 19"W
5.761
...,__
9.68'
-
o:92'
-
·,581
569.00 1 24.24' N27°02153"W .... 241
569.00' S3.46' N23°08'10"W :>.441
S69.00' 53.46' N17°45'12''W •A4'
569.00' 53.46' N12°22 11411W ,.441
569.001 53.461 N6°59117"W �,.441
569.oo' 42.66' N2
°
08'54"W • .66'
623.00' 3·4.80' S1°36°01 "E
623.00' 43.60' S5° 12'20"E
623.001 43.601 S9° 12''5611E •-.591
623.00' 43.60' S13°13131"E
623.00 1 43.601 S17° 14106"E ,591
623.00' 43.60' S21°14 14211E o.591
623.00' 54.57' S25°4513'4"E ,56 1
2n.00 1 45.42' S32°58'oo"E ,,37'
2n.oo' 51.301 S42°5s111"E .221
277.00' 40.93' S52°30'30"E �.901
211.00' 137.65' N42°3G'2011·w 6.241
223.001 37.101 N,36
° 43'1311[
1 11.061
223.00' 78.79' N51 °36'32"E 8,38'
223.00 1 115.89' S46°5G'34"W
250.001 129.93' S46°50'34"W
64.00' 121.13' N7l''16'G8"W
6-4.001 53.51' N67°24'20''W
64.00' 27.26' N31° 15'0411W
90.00' 14.t£' N23°39'33"W
sn.oo' 25. 7' s21°2614B"E
4.59 1
-8.47'
3.84 1
1<-971
5.171
877.0o' 52. 7' S24°54'39"E; 2:.46'
877.oo' 44.oo' s21° 4s'35"E �! .. 99'
877.oo' 44.00' s1a0s3'07"E 31,99-•
877.001 44.001 SHl000'39''E • '�.99 1
877.oo' 44.oo' s13°oe 1 1:>:"E -''.99'
877.oo' 44.oo' s10°15i'44"E • �.99'
877.00' 44.00' S7°23116"E J.991
877.00' 44.00' S4°30'4B"E �.99 1
sn.oo' 43.93' s1°J8129''E
877.oo' 3.16' so0os11211E
1.92'
.16 1
SH-E•ET ,, i :-F 8"' ' . . 0 �.- .
EXHIBIT 2
573
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-0764, Version: 1
ADOPT A MOTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROVE AN UPDATED REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION
PLAN AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR HOMELESS HOUSING, ASSISTANCE AND PREVENTION ROUND 6 APPLICATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a motion to:
1. Accept and approve the updated Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan for Round 6 of the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP 6) grant program;
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with San Joaquin County and San Joaquin Continuum of Care (COC); and
3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.
Summary
The general purpose of Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) funding is to build regional coordination and a unified regional response to reduce and end homelessness, informed by a best-practices framework focused on moving homeless individuals and families into permanent housing and supporting the efforts of those individuals and families to maintain their permanent housing. HHAP 6 requires applicants to strategically pair HHAP 6 funds with other local, state, and federal resources toward long-term sustainability of housing and supportive services and to prioritize permanent housing solutions.
HHAP 6, like Round 5, requires regions (i.e., the Continuum of Care, San Joaquin County, and the City of Stockton) to apply together and be signatory to a Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan. Funding allocations, though, may be disbursed directly to each entity. Applications and the Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan are due to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on or before August 29, 2025.
On July 15, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution 2025-07-15-1208 (Attachment A), authorizing staff to apply for, accept, and appropriate Round 6 of HHAP. This item is to approve the updated Regional Action Plan and execute a Memorandum of Understanding with San Joaquin County and San Joaquin Continuum of Care (COC) as part of the HHAP 6 application.
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
574
File #: 25-0764, Version: 1
DISCUSSION
Background
HHAP 6 reflects the state’s priorities to prevent and expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness through homelessness prevention activities and sustain existing Interim Housing Solutions and Permanent Housing Solutions, including long-term sustainability of permanent affordable housing (Health & Saf. Code § 50243(a)). To accomplish these goals, HHAP 6 requires applicants to create and implement Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plans (Health & Saf. Code § 50240) and be a signatory to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between each eligible applicant that is participating in the Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan.
On March 19, 2024, the City Council approved by motion the Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan and MOU as a prerequisite to apply for HHAP Round 5 funding (Attachment B - Motion 2024-03-19-1503).
The HHAP 6 Application and Award Process is as follows:
Timeframe
NOFA Release and Final Allocations Available February 2025 NOFA and Application Walk-through March 18, 2025
Final Applications Due August 29, 2025
HCD reviews and approves application or requests and reviews amendments on a rolling basis, estimated August - December 2025
The City’s allocation is $11,531,786.79 and is based on HUD certification of the 2024 Point in Time Count findings for all jurisdictions.
On July 15, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution 2025-07-15-1208, authorizing staff to apply for, accept, and appropriate Round 6 of HHAP.
Present Situation
The HHAP 6 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) was released in February 2025. The HHAP 6 application includes a variety of required components which are outlined below. Under each itemized requirement is the action taken, through the combined efforts of the City, County, and COC.
1. To be eligible for a HHAP 6 allocation award, Applicants for HHAP 6 funding must:
a. Conduct stakeholder engagement to support the development of the HHAP 6 Application.
i. The City and County completed the following engagement efforts 5/6/2025 Launched Survey
5/14/2025 First Public Meeting, Tracy - City Hall
5/20/2025 Second Public Meeting, Stockton - PH
5/21/2025 Third Public Meeting, Lodi - City Hall
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
575
File #: 25-0764, Version: 1
5/22/2025 Fourth First Public Meeting, Stockton - Civic 5/27/2025 Fifth Public Meeting, Manteca Library
5/27/2025 Sixth Public Meeting, Stockton - Arnold Rue CC 5/29/2025 Seventh Public Meeting, Stockton - Van Buskirk CC 6/6/2025 Survey closed
b. Apply as part of a region, and as a region, submit a complete HHAP 6 application through the application portal provided by HCD.
i. The full review process is listed below.
ii. City and County will submit a joint application with an updated Regional Action Plan, once approved by City Council, Continuum of Care, and County Board of Supervisors
c. The application will include the following sections:
i. Regional Identification and Contracting Information
ii. Documentation of Stakeholder Engagement
iii. Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan: This may be an updated version of a previously submitted and approved Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan.
1. Regional Partners’ Roles and Responsibilities
2. System Performance Measures Improvement Plan
a. HHAP 6 Funding Plan
3. Sustainability of the Region’s Housing Portfolio
4. Youth Set-Aside
a. Regional Memorandum of Understanding Planning
Review Process
8/1/2025 Post DRAFT for Initial Public Review, Notify Public 8/12/2025 City Council Review and Approval
8/14/2025 Continuum of Care Review and Approval
8/26/2025 Board of Supervisors Review and Approval
8/27/2025 Final approved DRAFT Complete
8/28/2025 Final Date to sign MOU
8/29/2025 Final Date for application Submission
The planning and activities to complete the application began in March after the Round 6 NOFA was released. Between the months of June and July, activities such as data collection from the survey and public meetings were reviewed and incorporated into the landscape analysis that informed the updates to the Regional Action Plan addressing all areas mentioned above in section “c.” The updated Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan is included as Attachment C and MOU as Attachment D.
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
576
File #: 25-0764, Version: 1
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
There is no financial impact to the City's General Fund as a result of this action. HHAP 6 funding will be appropriated and budgeted in the Special Grant Fund in the Housing Division.
Attachment A - Resolution 2025-07-15-1208
Attachment B - Motion 2024-03-19-1503
Attachment C - Updated Regional Homelessness Action Plan Attachment D - Memorandum of Understanding
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
577
ATTACHMENT A
578
ATTACHMENT A
579
ATTACHMENT B
580
ANNUAL UPDATE
AUGUST 2025
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
581
CONTENTS
I. Statement of Purpose .................................................................................................. 1 II. S
ummary of Strategic Plan Progress ............................................................................. 3 III. 2
025 Planning Process ................................................................................................. 5 Stakeholder Engagement ................................................................................................. 5 IV. Baseline Data .............................................................................................................. 6 Population Data ............................................................................................................... 6 Program Data .................................................................................................................. 8 V. S
ystem Performance Measures .................................................................................... 9 People Experiencing Homelessness ................................................................................. 9 Racial and Ethnic Disparities by Performance Measures ................................................. 11 VI. A
dditional Considerations .......................................................................................... 12 Affordability: Root Cause Analysis .................................................................................. 12 VII. R
ecommendations ..................................................................................................... 13 Input From Public Meetings ............................................................................................ 13 VIII.
2025 Action Plan Update............................................................................................. 15 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................. 16 Regional Logic Model ..................................................................................................... 20 System Performance Measures Improvement Plan ......................................................... 21 IX
. Funding and Implementation PLan ............................................................................. 27 HHAP-6 Funding Plan ..................................................................................................... 27 Sustaining the Region’s Interim Housing Portfolio ........................................................... 29 X. A
ppendices ............................................................................................................... 31 DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
582
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – INTRODUCTION
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 1
I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Purpose: Through this Action Plan Update, the County of San Joaquin, the City of Stockton, and the San Joaquin County Continuum of Care (SJCoC) commit to working jointly in a coordinated, regional fashion to:
• Expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness;
• Increase client self-sufficiency and decrease the risk of returns to homelessness; and • Make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring.
This updated Statement of Purpose is driven by community and stakeholder feedback, reviewed and refined by the members of the SJCoC, and in alignment with the guidance and direction of our federal, state, and local elected representatives.
Intent: Through this Action Plan, the three partners express their intentions and the planned strategies to address homelessness through the articulation of specific roles and responsibilities, actions, and funding plans.
Invitation: The Cities of Lathrop, Lodi, Manteca, Mountain House, Ripon, and Tracy are hereby invited to adopt this Action Plan and join this partnership. As independent public entities, the San Joaquin County Office of Education, the Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin, and the San Joaquin Council of Governments are also invited to partner in the work expressed within this 2025 Action Plan Update.
Strategic Shift: This update describes a strategic shift in the local response strategy towards a greater emphasis on addressing and reducing street homelessness and ensuring that individuals and households experiencing homelessness have more consistent pathways to finding their own best long-term stability.
And, consistent with guidance, this update represents the beginning of a shift from the construction of new program spaces, to now shifting resources towards the maintenance and sustainability of operations within these interim and permanent housing programs.
Fund Allocations: Through this Action Plan, the County of San Joaquin, the City of Stockton, and the San Joaquin County Continuum of Care agree to the collective allocation of $22,698,332.21 in Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Round 6 funds as follows:
Proposed Eligible Uses Proposed County /
SJCoC Allocations
Proposed City of
Stockton Allocations
Permanent Housing (18%)
• Rapid Rehousing
• Services and Coordination
$2,009,978.18
• $1,004,989.09
• $1,004,989.09
$2,075,721.62
• $1,037,860.81
• $1,037,860.81
Homeless Prevention (18%)
• Diversion Programs
• Prevention Programs
$2,009,978.18
• $1,004,989.09
• $1,004,989.09
$2,075,721.62
• $1,037,860.81
• $1,037,860.81
Interim Housing (46%)
• Operating Costs
• Enhanced Services
$5,136,610.89
• $2,568,305.45
• $2,568,305.45
$5,304,621.92
• $2,652,310.96
• $2,652,310.96
Youth Set Aside (10%)
• Homeless Prevention
• Interim Housing
$1,116,654.54
• $279,163.64
• $837,490.91
$1,153,178.68
• $288,294.67
• $864,884.01
Administration (7%) / HMIS (1%) $ 893,323.63 $ 922,542.94 Total $11,166,545.42 $11,531,786.79
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
583
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – INTRODUCTION
H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 2
Roles and Responsibilities: This update reaffirms and refines the following:
Partner Roles and Responsibilities to the San Joaquin Continuum of Care (SJCoC) are as described in the updated SJCoC Governance Charter, Adopted 7/10/2025. Partner Roles and Responsibilities to Implement this Regional Action Plan Update are described in this update.
A
uthority for this Action Plan: This was developed under the collaborative management of the County of San Joaquin, the City of Stockton, and the San Joaquin County Continuum of Care.
C
onsistent with CA Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5 of Part 1 of Division 31:
§
50240 (a) This is an update to the regionally coordinated homeless action plan. §
50240 (c) This updates and refines the following components of the prior 2024 Homeless Action Plan:
1. Roles and Responsibilities of Participating Jurisdictions
2. System Performance Measures Key Findings
3. System Performance Measures Improvement Plan
§
50240 (d) The community planning process included seven public meetings and a community-wide survey. Components were also discussed in meetings of the SJCoC Strategic Planning Committee and brought for public review and feedback at the SJCoC General Membership meeting on July 10, 2025. §
50240 (e) The planning process invited input from:
1. People with lived experience of homelessness
2. Youth with lived experience of homelessness
3. Local departmental leaders (County) and Staff from local municipalities (other smaller jurisdictions)
4. Homeless service and housing providers
5. Medi-Cal managed care plan partners
6. Street medicine providers and other outreach partners
7. Federally recognized tribal governments
§50240 (f) A [DRAFT until 8/28] Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) committing each signatory to participate in and comply with the Action Plan is included in the appendix. §
50240 (h) This updated Action Plan will be submitted for review by the California Department of Housing and Community Development no later than August 29, 2025, with the signed and executed copy of the M
OU.
§
50240 (i) This updated Action Plan was posted for community review by the County of San Joaquin and the City of Stockton on August 1, 2025, and announcements of the posting were circulated through the r
espective Public Information Officers for each qualifying jurisdiction.
A
ction Plan Term: This Action Plan will be implemented under a joint Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which shall be entered into following plan review and acceptance by the SJCoC Board of Directors, the Stockton City Council, and the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors, as of August 29, 2025, and continued until its termination on June 30, 2029, or modified or renewed.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
584
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – INTRODUCTION
H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 3
II. SUMMARY OF STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRESS
The f
ollowing section provides an update on:
• Progress in meeting the goals outlined in the 2020 Strategic Plan. • Additional actions and next steps underway to meet objectives.
San Joaquin Community Response to Homelessness (2020 Strategic Plan) Goal 1. Establish a Coordinated and Engaged Regional System of Care
1.1. Establish a cross
jurisdictional effort to create a
shared processes to access
funding streams, identify
community priorities, and
coordinate activities.
Progress / Next Steps
2025 Governance Charter, Collaborative Applicant Agreement, Action Plan, and MOUs. New SJCoC committee structure
strengthens program coordination with public agencies and managed care health partners. Multiple jurisdictions are participating in the SJCoC on an active basis.
1.2. Improve data collection,
measurement and analysis.
Progress / Next Steps
All programs receive funding for HMIS system licensure and training on data entry. Expanded system capacity and utility is desired.
1.3. Educate and engage the
community.
Progress / Next Steps
Robust participation in SJCoC and widespread awareness on issues and best practices for addressing homelessness. There is more public support for affordable housing and enhanced services for homeless individuals.
Goal 2. Increase Access and Reduce Barriers to Homeless Crisis Response System
2.1. Expand low-barrier shelter
capacity, hours, and services.
Progress / Next Steps
Emergency shelter capacity has increased from 883 beds to a projected total of 1,934 by the end of 2026 (120% increase since 2019). Majority of shelters are now entry/exit, not night-by-night. All shelters are low-barrier and have enriched services available. The SJCoC supports completing existing pipeline programs and working collaboratively to ensure the sustainability of shelter programs.
2.2. Invest in Prevention. Progress / Next Steps
Over the five previous years nearly 10,000 households have received some form of emergency rental assistance. Homeless prevention remains a priority. Consistent with best practices, homelessness prevention activities will now be paired with wraparound support services and employment assistance. Diversion programs will be available for those exiting an institution.
2.3. Improve and Expand Outreach
and Engagement.
Progress / Next Steps
Encampments under the Interstate 5/Highway 4 interchange complex and in the Mormon Slough are relatively dispersed, as are major encampments in Manteca and Tracy. However, unsheltered homelessness is at record highs. Outreach efforts are now coordinated by SJ CARES in cooperation with CalTrans and local law enforcement. New policies on addressing encampments are in review. All jurisdictions are encouraged to adopt the Governor’s Model Ordinance on Addressing Encampments (March 2025).
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
585
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – INTRODUCTION
H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 4
Goal 3. Ensure Households Experiencing Homelessness have Access to Affordable and Sustainable Permanent Housing Solutions
3.1. Increase affordable housing
stock for vulnerable adults, youth,
and families.
Progress / Next Steps
240 units of permanent supportive homeless housing have been constructed in the past five years and an additional 200+ are in the development pipeline. However, major changes to federal fund allocations may require new planning to ensure the long-term sustainability of these programs.
3.2. Invest in landlord
engagement, housing navigation,
and incentives.
Progress / Next Steps
A county wide Coordinated Entry System (CES) is in place. SJCoC is adopting a by-name list case conferencing process. All placements in affordable housing programs must be through the CES. Landlord engagement and incentives will be standardized per HUD guidance.
Rapid Rehousing and Rental Assistance programs are time limited with certain eligibility requirements and participation expectations that are trauma informed and consistent with harm-reduction.
3.3. Expand case management,
employment supports, and
services.
Progress / Next Steps
Services remain fragmented and uncoordinated. Major efforts are needed to develop a uniform approach and service standards, including criteria for program success and participant completion.
K
ey Actions for System Strengthening (2025 updates):
Im
prove program outcomes
1. D
evelop a housing-focused shelter model. Standardize expectations for housing navigation and case management within interim housing programs, including eligible transitional housing. Standardize processes for working with individuals living unsheltered or in places not fit for human habitation.
2. Develop regional Rapid-Rehousing / Rental Assistance funding and practice expectations. Develop practice guidelines for other innovative and creative housing solutions, including master leasing and landlord incentives.
3. Create regional screening and referral protocols to escalate case management and treatment for individuals likely to have serious mental illnesses or other disabling conditions that require specialty interventions.
Im
prove system transparency and accountability
4. R
elease regular communications for community stakeholders and partners; update the website to better publish and distribute information. Provide clear guidance to all stakeholders on new approaches to expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness.
5. Complete a comprehensive review of the HMIS to enhance client-level coordination and collaboration, program management and monitoring, and system-wide assessments of performance measures.
6. Standardize procurement and contract monitoring processes. Develop a coordinated County/City review process to ensure the timely, appropriate, and consistent use of public resources to achieve d
esired outcomes for people experiencing homelessness.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
586
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 5
III. 2025 PLANNING PROCESS
Stakeholder Engagement
Rane Community Development led research activities for this 2025 Regional Homeless Action Plan Update.
The mixed-method approach combined qualitative research consisting of public meetings, discussion groups, and a community survey, as described below;
Analysis of a local community online survey regarding program priorities, including strategies to expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness. (Conducted Spring 2025, with 236 respondents). Feedback from the seven public meetings held in May 2025.
City Date Time Address
Tracy Wed. May 14th 10am - Noon City Hall Rm 203- 333 Civic Center Plaza Stockton Tues. May 20th 3pm - 5pm Behavioral Health - 1212 N. California St.
Stockton Thurs. May 22nd 5pm - 7pm Civic Auditorium - 525 N Center St.
Manteca Tues. May 27th 3:30pm - 5:30pm Manteca City Hall - 1001 W. Center St.
Stockton Tues. May 27th 5pm - 7pm Arnold Rue CC - 5758 Lorriane Ave.
Lodi Tues. May 28th 1pm - 3pm Hutchins Street Square - 125 S Hutchins St Stockton Thurs. May 29th 5pm - 7pm Van Buskirk CC - 734 Houston Ave Initial findings were reviewed and clarified by key stakeholders and partners of the SJCoC. The SJCoC Strategic Planning Committee, General Membership, and its Board reviewed and approved all strategies and priorities in this Action Plan Update.
Meeting Date Venue
SJCoC Strategic Planning Committee Retreat Fri. June 20th By invitation / In-person SJCoC Strategic Planning Committee Meeting Mon. June 30th Open Meeting / Online SJCoC General Membership Meeting Thur. July 10th Open Meeting / Hybrid SJCoC Strategic Planning Committee Meeting Mon. July 28th Open Meeting / Online Stockton City Council Tues. July 29th City Hall / Hybrid The Updated Action Plan was posted for public review on August 1, 2025, and subsequently submitted for discussion and/or review at the following public meetings.
Meeting Date Venue
Stockton City Council Tues. Aug 12th Stockton City Hall SJCoC Board Meeting Thur. Aug 14th Open meeting / Hybrid San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors Tues. Aug 26th County Admin Building An
d;
Quantitative analyses of data from the State of California’s Homeless Data Integration System (HDIS), the U.S. Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s) Homeless Management of Information S
ystem (HMIS), the SJCoC’s Point-in-Time (PIT) count, and local Housing Inventory Counts (HICs).
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
587
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 6
IV. BASELINE DATA
Population Data
POINT IN TIME COUNT
The total number of persons experiencing homelessness is increasing. Locally, 73% of persons ex
periencing homelessness are unsheltered.
Persons experiencing homelessness are increasingly female (38%), over 55 years of age (27%) or under 25 (13%). Homelessness among youth 18 – 24 is rising at a faster pace than other population g
roups.
Homelessness affects persons of all race/ethnicities, however Black/African American community members remain disproportionately impacted, accounting for 19% of those identified through the P
oint in Time Count, despite representing less than 8% of the region’s overall population make-up. Most people have experienced more than one episode of homelessness (56%) and when they are homeless, continue in that state for one year or more (70%). System involvement is common, with 24% having spent a night in detention/custody over the past y
ear and 14% self-reporting as prior foster care recipients. Over one-third (38%) of homeless individuals surveyed reported having a disabling condition and 2 7% reported that they were completely unable to work. 0 500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Point in Time Count 2017 through 2024
Sheltered and Unsheltered Persons
Sheltered Count Unsheltered Count
200%
Increase
1,552
4,732
11 DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
588
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 7
14 12
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
589
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 8
Program Data
HOUSING INVENTORY COUNT
U
tilization Data from 2025 Housing Inventory Count
Housing/Program Type Capacity
(# of Beds)
Occupancy Occupancy Rate 2024
Beds and Use Rate
Emergency Shelters 1,346 1,085 80.6% 1,311 68.0%
Transitional Housing 352 206 58.5% 326 52.1%
Permanent Housing Vouchers 1,261 1,261 100% 530 77.0% Permanent Supportive
Housing or PH w/ services 789 722 91.5% 752 86.4% Rapid Re-Housing 532 532 100% 381 100%
Total (All Types) 4,280 3,806 88.9% 3,300 75.8%
The number of available interim shelter beds and permanent housing solutions has increased significantly over the past five years.
Program utilization improved in 2025 and was stronger than any prior year. Despite bed/unit capacity increasing, the number of people experiencing homelessness and living unsheltered remains high.
Construction / development projects are not keeping up with the growing demand for safe places for people who are experiencing homelessness to stay as they work to regain stability. 502 371523
932
591
1452
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Family Shelter Adult Shelter
Change in Shelter Bed Capacity
2019 - 2025
* 2025/2026, New or in construction
2019 2024 2025
883
2019 2026
1,934
120% increased capacity
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
590
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 9
V. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MEASURES
People Experiencing Homelessness
According to the most recent report generated by the San Joaquin CoC Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and released by the state's Homeless Data Information System (HDIS), the number of unduplicated individuals receiving homeless services is 11,287, about the same as the prior year, but an increase of nearly 40% from 2020.
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Measure CY 2020 10/1/23 –
9/30/24
% Change
from 2020
Progress /
Score
1.a. Number of persons experiencing
homelessness in HMIS
8,138 11,287 + 39% worsening
1.b. Estimated number of people experiencing
unsheltered homelessness on the SJCoC PIT
count1
1,558 3,469 +123% worsening
2. Number of people accessing services who
are experiencing homelessness for the first
time
4,273 5,452 +28% worsening
3. Number of people exiting homelessness into
permanent housing
715 1,183 +65% improving
4. Average length of time (in days) that people
were enrolled in non-residential or short-term
programs without securing long-term housing
69 94 +36% worsening
5. Percent of people who return to
homelessness within 6 months of exiting
homelessness response system to permanent
housing
10.8% 8.64% -1.44% improving
6. Number of people with successful
placements from street outreach (temporary or
permanent)
2* 15* +650% improving
* Low numbers a re likely the result of inconsistent / erroneous data entry or submission upload practices.
Technical assistance has been requested to rectify this issue. 1 The 2024 PIT Count used an updated survey sampling methodology to count unsheltered homelessness. 2024 PIT count figures likely correct an undercounting from prior years. Locally, the SJCoC recognizes that there has been an increase in homelessness, though the rate of change may be closer to 39% (as indicated by the increase in unique service recipients reported in measure 1.a. above,) than the123% increase reflected through the changes in people experiencing unsheltered homelessness.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
591
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 10
INDIVIDUALS SERVED BY KEY CHARACTERISTICS (N=11,287)
Gender / Household Composition Number Proportion of Total Man/Boy 6,011 53%
Woman/Girl 5,229 46%
Transgender 31 0%
Single adults without children 5,780 51%
People in families with at least 1 child 5,190 46%
People in households with only children 671 6%
INDIVIDUALS SERVED BY VULNERABILITIES
Additional Vulnerabilities Count (2024) Count (2025) Change Adults with Substance Use Disorders (SUD) 1,339 1,327 - 1% Adults with Serious Mental illnesses (SMI) 1,182 1,346 + 14% Veterans 463 359 - 22%
Adults fleeing Domestic Violence (DV) 337 257 - 24%
Parenting Youth 249 282 + 13%
Unaccompanied Youth (18-24) 511 545 + 7%
Older Adults (50+ years old) NA 2,233 NA
HDIS program service utilization data shows slightly different data than Point-in-Time data though g
enerally the trends remain consistent, with:
o A greater proportion of females experiencing homelessness o One-fifth of those served were over the age of 50.
o A disconcerting number of children are experiencing homelessness, and data shows an inc
rease in the number of homeless unaccompanied youth who are themselves parents. The proportion of adults with serious mental illnesses may be increasing, although this may be c
onsistent with better coordination with San Joaquin County Behavioral Health Services and improved diagnostics rather than an actual change in the population composition.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
592
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 11
Racial and Ethnic Disparities by Performance Measures
PROGRAM UTILIZATION RACE/ETHNICITY2:
Measure 1a:
Number of
people
accessing
services who are
experiencing
homelessness
Measure 2:
Number of
people
accessing
services who are
experiencing
homelessness
for the first
time
Measure 3:
Number of
people exiting
homelessness
into permanent
housing
Measure 4:
Average length of
time (in days)
Measure 5:
Percent of people
who return to
homelessness
within 6 months
of exiting
homelessness to
permanent
housing
American Indian or
Alaska Native (alone or
in combination)
3% 2% 3% 16% 0%
Asian or Asian
American (alone or in
combination)
4% 5% 4% 14% 11%
Black or African
American (alone or in
combination)
29% 30% 30% 14% 4%
Hispanic/Latino (alone
or in combination) 29% 32% 27% 13% 18%
Middle Eastern or
North African (alone or
in combination)***
0% 0% 0% 4% 0%
Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific
Islander (alone or in
combination)
1% 1% 2% 23% 0%
White (alone or in
combination) 34% 30% 34% 16% 10%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
People who are Black or African American and experiencing homelessness are accessing services at rates that are disproportionately higher than their rate in the general population. People who are Hispanic/Latino return to homelessness within 6 months of exiting homelessness to permanent housing at rates somewhat higher than for others. Variations in performance measures are not statistically significant across other ethnicity/race c
ategories, or measures, due to low sample sizes.
2 Data is extrapolated from HDIS data run, provided to CA-511 on 4-4-2025. Data includes Ethnicity and Race data whenever that race/ethnicity was indicated either alone or in combination with another category. Of the 11,287 people served, there were 13,520 race/ethnicity entries. Respondents were more likely to select White or Hispanic/Latino in combination than other ethnicity and racial categories.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
593
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH H
OMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 12
VI. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Affordability: Root Cause Analysis
CHALLENGES:
Since 2010, the region has grown nearly 20%.
Housing demand has outpaced supply, driving prices up. Our region needs housing for 13,293 very low-income households who earn less than 50% of AMI. Federal funding for affordable housing is likely to decline. o 189 h
ouseholds (554 individuals) are losing their emergency housing voucher and at im
minent risk of homelessness.
o An estimated 2,000 households are at risk of having a permanent housing voucher converted to a shorter term rental assistance program, putting the housing stability of an estimated 6,000 individuals at risk over the next several years.
OPPORTUNITIES:
There are new shelters and affordable housing projects being developed in nearly every community. Four cities have dedicated homeless services coordinators bringing partners together to address the crisis.
New state guidance provides a framework for more successfully addressing encampments and expeditiously reducing unsheltered homelessness.
ON THE HORIZON:
New opportunities to develop innovative housing programs, including shared communities and programs that meet clients’ recovery and job training needs. More clarity on the role of HHAP funds to address housing-focused solutions, that sustain existing operations.
More clarity on recommended policies, practices, and funding opportunities for street outreach, safe p
arking sites, and other strategies to expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
594
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 13
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS
Input From Public Meetings
SUMMARY
1. Re-examine residential services and supports and adopt an incremental approach. There should be more flexibility for movement up and down a housing continuum. Locally the SJCoC will strengthen its coordination with health care, behavioral health, and justice partners to prevent homelessness, or returns to homelessness, for vulnerable populations. Consistent with guidance, investments will be directed towards programs that provide rental assistance, rapid rehousing, and other diversion support programs that prevent people at-risk of homelessness (or recently experiencing homelessness) from entering unsheltered homelessness or interim shelter programs, including those exiting institutions.
2. The region will meet its capital expansion goals for shelters and housing with pipeline projects. Investments must shift from capital projects to sustaining operations of programs.
Consistent with guidance, all HHAP 6 funds are budgeted towards eligible Housing Solutions. Funding prioritizes sustaining operations within existing interim housing programs and trauma-informed and evidence-based intensive case management services, housing navigation, connecting people to substance use or mental health treatment, public benefits advocacy, and other supportive services to promote stability and referral into permanent housing.
3. The local approach must shift from “housing” as the goal to that of long-term client success. All projects must strive to optimize self-sufficiency among individuals and families experiencing homelessness.
Consistent with guidance, investments in program operations will be directed towards service enriched programs that are trauma-informed and practice harm reduction, to include intensive case management services, assertive community treatment services, critical time intervention services, other tenancy support services, evidence-based employment services, coordinating mental health, substance use, and primary care treatment of other evidence-based supportive services to increase housing retention.
4. Homelessness among children and youth, and among youth 18-24 who are themselves parenting is increasing.
Consistent with evidence-based practices, children and youth focused services will include transitional housing with longer-term program supports and services available; as is consistent with the developmental needs of young people and the supports necessary to stabilize entire families.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
595
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 14
DETAILED INPUT BY KEY STAKEHOLDER GROUP
Stakeholders Description of how stakeholders were
invited and encouraged to engage.
The specific input
incorporated into plan
People with lived
experience of
homelessness, including
but not limited to survivors
of domestic violence
Joint effort of the Public Information teams of the
City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin.
Additional posting and distribution through the
CoC. AND partnership with local homeless
shelters to encourage shelter residents to attend
public meetings.
Request for more assistance
achieving long-term self-sufficiency.
More employment readiness and job
seeking support and easier access
to substance use treatments
services.
Youth with lived
experience of
homelessness
Joint effort of the Public Information teams of the
City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin.
Additional posting and distribution through the
CoC. AND partnership with the Youth Advisory
Board
Recognition of the growing
incidence of youth homelessness.
Discussions of “what works,” when
engaging youth overcoming trauma.
Local department
leaders and staff from
qualifying smaller
jurisdictions.
Joint effort of the Public Information teams of the
City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin.
Additional posting and distribution through the
CoC. AND targeted invitations to department
leaders and city staff from smaller jurisdictions.
Intention to better align homeless
services with existing workforce
development programs.
Homeless services and
housing providers,
including developers of
permanent affordable
housing operating within
the region.
Joint effort of the Public Information teams of the
City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin.
Additional posting and distribution through the
CoC. AND targeted outreach / discussions with
Local Housing Authority.
Intention to prioritize (1) sustaining
operations of shelters programs (2)
preparing for potential cuts in
federal housing subsidies and
preventing returns to homelessness
and (3) more case management and
workforce development in
conjunction with housing solutions.
Each Medi-Cal Managed
Care Plan contracted
with the State
Department of Health
Care Services in the
region
Joint effort of the Public Information teams of the
City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin.
Additional posting and distribution through the
CoC. AND targeted outreach / discussions with
the MCPs.
Leveraging resources from the MCPs
under the CalAIM expansion to
partially address shelter operational
costs through billable services.
More assistance with application
processes requested from MCPs.
Federally recognized
tribal governments
pursuant to Section 4103
of Title 25 of the United
States Code that are
within the region.
Joint effort of the Public Information teams of the
City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin.
Additional posting and distribution through the
CoC. AND letters of invitation to Tribal entities
and Native serving organizations.
Ongoing attention to the
disproportionate rates of
homelessness among Native
Americans and the systemic takings
of land/homes by government
and/or the deliberate removal of
children from families as causal-
factors for intergenerational Native
poverty and incarceration must
shape trauma informed services.
Street medicine
providers, victim service
providers, and other
service providers ass-
isting people experiencing
homelessness or at risk
of homelessness
Joint effort of the Public Information teams of the
City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin.
Additional posting and distribution through the
CoC. AND targeted invitations to local service
providers to ensure broad participation and
attendance at public meetings and the
stakeholder planning process.
Stronger coordination is required
between partner agencies.
Leadership and direction is needed
to guide more uniform program
eligibility, intake, service
expectations, and referral / exit
criteria.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
596
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 15
VIII. 2025 ACTION PLAN UPDATE
COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
HHAP 6 EXPENDITURES
Permanent Housing Solutions
o Rapid rehousing and rental assistance: HSC §50243 (e)(1)(A-C) and §50243 (e)(2) o Operating subsidies (priority is to sustain existing programs): HSC §50243 (e)(1)(D) o Services and service coordiantion: HSC §50243 (e)(1)(E) and §50243 (e)(1 )(G) Homelessness Prevention and Youth Homelessness Prevention o Prevention and diversion: HSC §50243 (e)(2)(A) and §50243 (e)(2)(B) Interim Housing and Youth Transitional Housing
o Costs associated with operations: HSC §50243 (e)(3)(A-D) o Services and service coordiantion: HSC §50243 (e)(3)(E) and §50243 (e)(3)(H) Administrative Costs
o Up to 7% for Administrative costs, and 1% for HMIS related costs.
MEASURES OF SUCCESS (STATE AND LOCAL PRIORITIES)
From a 2024 HDIS baseline of 11,287 total persons experiencing homelessness:
Decrease the number of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness (on a single day). o From a 2024 PIT baseline of 3,469.
Reduce the proportion first time homelessness for those exiting institutional settings. o Baseline not yet measured. (HDIS measure pending)
Increase the number of people exiting homelessness into permanent housing. o From a 2024 HDIS baseline of 1,183.
Decrease the number of people experiencing chronic homelessness. o From a 2024 PIT baseline of 1,078; among whom 72% are unsheltered. Decrease the number of unaccompanied children and youth experiencing homelessness. o From a 2024 PIT baseline of 304; among whom 80% are unsheltered.
Prevent Imminent
Risk of
Homelessness
Sustain Interim
Housing
Operations
Expand Housing
Assistance and
Self-Sufficiency
Supports
Address Increases
in Youth
Homelessness
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
597
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 16
Roles and Responsibilities
OUTREACH AND SITE COORDINATION
Activities pertaining to the outreach and engagement of unsheltered homeless individuals and site coordination for the resolution of unsanctioned encampments.
Participating
Jurisdictions
Role(s) and Responsibilities in Outreach and Site Coordination SJCoC • Convene workgroups of homeless service partners, people with lived experience, local law enforcement agencies, public works agencies, CalTrans, and others to develop and adopt a uniform set of practice guidance for homeless outreach and encampment resolution.
• Review the Governor’s Model Ordinance and other emerging policies, legislation, and best practices. Provide information to members of the public, including people experiencing homelessness on anticipated changes in local practices for outreach, engagement, and encampment resolution.
• Endorse the Governor’s Model Ordinance and encourage regional adoption. • Coordinate the Point-in-time Count activities to provide regular information on the impact of local efforts to expeditiously reduce the number of people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness with urgency and dignity.
San Joaquin
County
• The Collaborative Applicant will initiate convenings by December 31, 2025. • Will continue to provide leadership in outreach and site coordination through San Joaquin County Behavioral Health Services and the SJCARES team, respectively. • Will provide guidance on model co-response practices for outreach and engagement, as well as when and how to utilize a mobile 24/7 BHS response team. • Will provide leadership in deploying joint resources (site coordination) for encampment resolution activities through SJCARES.
• Will task the Human Services Agency (HSA), the Health Care Services Agency (HCSA) and its affiliated departments, including Behavioral Health Services (BHS), and the Probation Department’s SJ CAREs team to provide resources, information and other assistance as best able during targeted activities to sites for the purpose of providing a trauma-informed and problem-solving approach to addressing factors contributing to households living unsheltered and in places not fit for human habitation.
City of Stockton • City public safety and municipal services will continue to work jointly to address encampments of unsheltered homeless households with urgency and dignity. • Will work in partnership with the County and SJCoC to develop a uniform set of practice guidance for homeless outreach and encampment resolution. • Will review the Governor’s Model Ordinance and develop recommendations on how the Draft Ordinance can contribute to City efforts.
• Stockton Police Department will continue to work in partnership with the SJ CARES team and other public safety partners to monitor the situation in encampments for matters pertaining to community safety, public health, potential damage to civic infrastructure, and other criteria and create monitoring and patrol plans to address situations as they arise.
• Stockton Police Department will continue to work in partnership with health, behavioral health, and other community-based service providers to ensure that all providers are aware of the individuals and families who are living unsheltered in our community and in need of coordinated support and assistance.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
598
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 17
SITING AND USE OF AVAILABLE LAND
Advanced planning to make housing more affordable within the region and to ensure compliance with state guidance for local and regional land use planning.
Participating
Jurisdictions
Role(s) and Responsibilities in Land Use and Development SJCoC • The CoC has no direct role or responsibility as it relates to land use and development.
However, the SJCoC will continue to work collaboratively with San Joaquin County, the City of Stockton, and other smaller jurisdictions within the region regarding the importance of innovative and affordable housing opportunities to address the needs of the 13,293 households earning less than 50% of AMI in our community who are severely rent burdened and/or at risk of homelessness.
San Joaquin
County
• The County will identify available areas and projects for development opportunities; build partnerships with third party developers that streamline or improve development projects and timelines.
• The County has updated its housing element to allow for expanded development of mobile and manufactured housing throughout the unincorporated regions of the County in an effort to encourage the development of low and very low income housing. • The County has also removed a discretionary permit requirement for residential uses in its commercial zones and permitted all multifamily residential uses with a ministerial zoning compliance review.
• The County will continue its collaboration with the City of Stockton, Smaller Jurisdictions, the local Housing Authority, and others to support development opportunities, including the pursuit of funding opportunities such as Homekey to expand the regional portfolio of housing for very low and acutely low income households.
City of Stockton • The City will identify available areas and projects for development opportunities; build partnerships with third party developers that streamline or improve development projects and timelines.
• The City has made available on its public website both a community land inventory and a listing of surplus properties. The City has an open invitation for Requests for Interest / Statement of Qualifications for Development of Partnership Opportunities for the surplus land parcels.
• An interactive mapping tool shows pipeline projects and vacant sites within the City that are prioritized for residential development.
• The City has been awarded the “Prohousing Designation” from the CA Department of Housing and Urban Development. Key components of the Prohousing designation include:
o 100% density bonus that exceeds State standards,
o allowance of duplexes “by-right” in single-family residential zones, o streamlined project reviews, and
o the Citywide Affordable Housing Development Fee Exemption Program, which reduces the financial burden of developing affordable housing. • The City has an active program to encourage major projects, including new and rehabilitated mixed use and multi-family housing, through the Advantage Stockton initiative which showcases available properties suitable for development.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
599
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 18
DEVELOPMENT OF SHELTER, INTERIM AND PERMANENT HOUSING OPTIONS Ensuring a broad continuum of housing solutions for homeless individuals and families is available and can be sustained over time to address local needs.
Participating
Jurisdictions
Role(s) and Responsibilities in Development of Interim and Permanent Housing Options
SJCoC • Will continue to work collaboratively with San Joaquin County, the City of Stockton, and Smaller Jurisdictions to support them in the development and financing of interim and permanent housing within the regions.
• Will continue to work closely with agencies that provide Permanent Housing options to the homeless: Housing Authority County of San Joaquin, Visionary Home Builders, STAND Affordable Housing, Central Valley Low Income Housing Corporation and others that provide Vouchers for both tenant-based and project-based opportunities. • Consistent with SB 166, our local priority is to complete the development of projects in the pipeline and bring the estimated 588 shelter beds and 221 permanent housing units under construction into operation within the next 12-24 months.
San Joaquin County • See above for SJCoC, and;
• Anticipates the opening of an additional 252 shelter beds within three Smaller Jurisdictions over the next 12-24 months.
• A key priority is ensuring the ongoing sustainability of these programs as they are necessary to our strategy to expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness in the County.
• Will develop the Be Well Behavioral Health Campus, a 23-acre parcel currently approved for 354,400 gross square feet of behavioral health facilities and 426 residential units/beds. The campus will feature facilities that will provide outpatient care, urgent behavioral and mental health services, residential treatment, and transitional housing. The projected budget is $261.8 million, and construction is anticipated in 2026, following an environmental review and final permitting.
City of Stockton • See above for SJCoC, and;
• Anticipates the opening of an additional 336 shelter beds within the City over the next 12 months (which includes an additional 68 beds for families). • A key priority is ensuring the ongoing sustainability of these programs as they are necessary to our strategy to expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness in the County.
• Will continue to work closely with the affordable housing projects under construction within the City to provide streamlined project reviews and timely inspections using a concierge approach with routine project meetings between city staff and the development teams.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
600
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 19
COORDINATION AND CONNECTION TO SERVICE DELIVERY
Regional coordination and collaboration across jurisdictions and service divisions to connect homeless individuals and families to existing community services and supports.
Participating
Jurisdictions
Role(s) and Responsibilities in connection to Service Delivery SJCoC • The CoC promotes community-wide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness.
Serves as the convenor of partners and stakeholders, including those experiencing homelessness. Roles and responsibilities were adopted July 2025, through the Governance Charter of the CoC and the Regional Action Plan, Updated August 2025. • Will fund regional housing related solutions, including sustaining the operations of interim housing.
• Will continue to strengthen collaboration with Service Providers and stakeholders, including those with lived experience, transitional aged youth, and veterans. • Will continue to emphasize the utilization of the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and the expansion of the Coordinated Entry System (CES) to support housing placement and coordination practices that improve the delivery of services. • Will facilitate discussions on the coordination of and connection to service delivery leveraging the CoC Committee structure to ensure a CoC wide approach and/or effort that improves the delivery of services for people experiencing or at-risk of experiencing homelessness.
San Joaquin
County • The County serves as the Collaborative Applicant for the CoC and provides day-to-day staffing, management, and expertise to address and prevent homelessness. Coordinates the PIT Count and oversees activities for HMIS and CES management. • Will fund housing related solutions, including contributions to efforts to sustain the operations of interim housing in smaller jurisdictions. • The designees of the San Joaquin County Probation Department, Public Health Department, and Behavioral Health Department shall serve on the CoC Board and actively participate in committee activities. The Deputy Director of the Human Services Agency’s Employment and Youth Services Program shall oversee the activities of County staff serving as the Collaborative Applicant for SJCoC.
City of Stockton • The City works in close partnership and collaboration with the County and CoC to develop a regional approach and strategy to address and prevent homelessness. • Will contribute a fair share allocation of costs for the operations, management, oversight, of certain federally mandated activities of the CoC, including PIT Count, HMIS, and CES operations.
• Will fund housing related solutions, including contributions to efforts to sustain the operations of interim housing within the City’s Sphere of Influence. • A designee of the City of Stockton shall serve on the CoC Board and actively participate in committee activities. The City’s Economic Development Department and Community Development Departments will continue their close partnership in the siting and development of interim and permanent housing.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
601
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 20
Regional Logic Model
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
602
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 21
System Performance Measures Improvement Plan
STRATEGIES, ACTIVITIES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Success Measure 1: Decrease the number of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness.
Key Actions: 3.a, 3.b, 4.a, A.1, A.2
Strategy Activity Tracking Success Performance Measure
1. Strengthen local policies and
municipal codes to compliment
street outreach activities.
Adopt Governor’s Model Ordinance
for addressing encampments.
Adopt uniform outreach practice
model, based on Cal-ICH and
UCSF- Benioff guidance reports.
• Cities with updated ordinances.
• Cities with street outreach policies.
Reduce the number of people
living unsheltered, as
measured through the bi-
annual point-in-time count.
Improved parity in
experiences across
race/ethnicity and as
consistent with the
demographic proportion of
the county population.
2. Improve street outreach
through more effective case
management and staff/program
accountability.
Deploy coordinated teams of
outreach workers, case managers,
and others to provide time-limited
outreach activities / interventions.
• Unsheltered clients open to the street
outreach teams in HMIS.
• Unsheltered clients successfully
closed to a known location in HMIS.
3. Leverage additional (non-HHAP)
resources.
Work in partnership with public
safety, health care providers, and
behavioral health services.
• Amount of local resources (funding
and/or staff members) invested in
outreach efforts.
• Average length of time cases are open.
4. Seek additional funding for
targeted encampment
resolution activities.
Apply to ERF for temporary safe
parking / triage services to resolve
entrenched encampments.
• Amount of new resources (funding
and/or staff members) secured to
address encampments is sufficient.
5. Support, sustain, and enhance
existing interim housing
programs.
Distribute HHAP funding to existing,
qualifying shelter programs for
operations and enhanced services.
• Homeless clients transition from night-
by-night only to enrolled program
clients receiving intensive services
through an entry/exit program.
Success Measure 1, HHAP-6 Eligible Expenditures:
• Operating Costs for Navigation Centers or other emergency shelters that are existing, low-barrier, and as defined in Sections 65660 and 65662 of the Government Code.
• Services provided to people in Interim Housing, so long as the services are trauma-informed and practice harm reduction.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
603
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 22
Success Measure 2: Reduce first time instances of homelessness for those exiting institutional settings, including, but not limited to juvenile detention or wardship (youth) or jails, prisons, or hospitals (youth and adults) Key Actions: 2.a, A.1, A.2
Strategy Activity Tracking Success Performance Measure
6. Leverage additional (non-HHAP)
resources.
Work in partnership with public
safety, health care providers, and
behavioral health services.
Coordinate efforts to address youth
homelessness in partnership with
child welfare services division.
• Amount of local resources (funding
and/or staff members) invested in
activities for jail / custody reentry
services.
• Number of street outreach clients
identified as having recently existed
an institution.
• Number of youth / young adult clients
identified as having prior child welfare
involvement.
HMIS enrollments show a
decrease in clients whose
prior living situation was in an
institution, as defined by
federal statute.
Improved parity in
experiences across
race/ethnicity and as
consistent with the
demographic proportion of
the county population.
7. Expand investments in
transitional housing and
diversion programs.
Distribute HHAP funding to qualifying
programs providing trauma-informed
case management services.
• Enrollments in problem solving,
diversion, and transitional programs.
o Average length of time in program
o Successful closures (to
permanent housing / placement)
Success Measure 2, HHAP-6 Eligible Expenditures:
• Problem solving and diversion programs intended to assist people exiting an institution in resolving their immediate housing crisis and averting a placement in a shelter or living unsheltered on the streets. • Youth-focused homeless prevention / interim housing activities, including rental assistance and transitional housing programs with intensive case management services.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
604
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 23
Success Measure 3: Increasing the Number of People Exiting Homelessness into Permanent Housing Key Actions: 1.a, 1.b, A.1, A.2
Strategy Activity Tracking Success Performance Measure
8. Expand the RRH/RA program
and enhance with more
supportive services and service
coordination.
Work in partnership to create
RRH/RA policies that provide clear
guidance on assistance eligibility
and criteria.
Work through the CES to determine
eligibility and priority based on
household vulnerabilities.
Convene monthly case conferencing
sessions to develop housing
placement plans for those
experiencing chronic homelessness
and at high levels of vulnerability.
• Enrollments into an RRH/RA program
(eligible for voucher).
• Average length of time enrolled in a
RRH/RA program between eligibility
and placement.
• Average length of time enrolled in a
RRH/RA program from initial
placement to case closure.
• Proportion of households gaining a
place to live that previously met the
definition of chronic homeless.
Number of exits from a street
outreach program to a
permanent housing program.
Number of exits from an
interim or transitional
housing program to a
permanent housing program.
Number of exits from a
permanent housing program
to a known location,
indicative of a successful
graduation from homeless
system supports.
9. Leverage existing employment
and benefit assistance
programs.
Work in partnership with CalWorks,
Worknet, and other local workforce
development programs.
• Participation of workforce partners in
case conferencing sessions.
Number of people exiting
homelessness with increased
amount / sources of income.
Percent exiting with income
over 30% AMI.
Success Measure 3, HHAP-6 Eligible Expenditures:
• Rental subsidies, including to support placement of individuals in CARE Court or related problem-solving court. • Landlord incentives (security deposits or holding fees) or move-in expenses. • Supportive services for people in permanent housing.
• Service coordination and linkages to programs and other services to promote client capacity to maintain their housing stability. • Operating subsidies, on a time limited basis, to address potential loss of federal housing subsidies. (For existing programs only).
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
605
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 24
Success Measure 4: Reduce the number of individuals experiencing homelessness (Prevent homelessness) Key Actions 2.b, 4.b, A.1, A.2
Strategy Activity Tracking Success Performance Measure
10. Sustain, as feasible, existing
permanent housing programs
for people with disabling
conditions and the elderly at
risk of housing loss due to
federal policy changes.
Provide temporary rental
assistance for other qualifying
households whose HUD
program eligibility has been
terminated.
Work with coordinated entry system
and local housing authority to
develop short-term plan to address
anticipated loss of federal housing
vouchers.
• Count of households impacted by
HUD policy changes.
• Count of qualifying households
offered short-term rental assistance.
o Count of new enrollments into the
HMIS system whose prior living
situation was a rental by client,
with ongoing housing subsidy
[HMIS Field # 435]
Reduced incidence of and
returns to homelessness for
individuals as measured
through PIT Count and annual
HDIS system performance
reports.
Among those households
experiencing first time
homelessness, minimize the
proportion with prior federal
housing subsidies.
Improved parity in
experiences across
race/ethnicity and as
consistent with the
demographic proportion of
the county population.
11. Leverage existing employment
and benefit assistance
programs. Engage eligible
households.
Workforce development programs
receiving public funds will be tasked
with engaging with clients of interim
and permanent housing programs,
as appropriate.
• Partnership with local CalWorks
program administrator and services.
• Guidance developed regarding
income and household stabilization.
Success Measure 4, HHAP-6 Eligible Expenditures:
• Rental assistance, rapid rehousing, and other programs prioritizing households with income at or below 30 percent of the area median income. • Service coordination, including access to workforce, education, and training programs or other services needed to promote housing stability.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
606
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 25
Success Measure 4: Reduce the number of individuals experiencing homelessness (Chronically Homeless) Key Actions: 1.b, 2.a, 3.a., A.1, A.2
Strategy Activity Tracking Success Performance Measure
12. Leverage existing employment
and benefit assistance
programs.
Workforce development programs
receiving public funds will be tasked
with engaging with clients of interim
and permanent housing programs,
as appropriate.
• Partnership with local CalWorks
program administrator and services.
• Guidance developed regarding
income stabilization.
Reduced incidence of and
returns to homelessness for
chronically homeless
individuals as measured
through PIT Count and annual
HDIS system performance
reports.
Improved parity in
experiences across
race/ethnicity and as
consistent with the
demographic proportion of
the county population.
13. Expand investments in
services and supports for
interim and permanent
housing programs which offer
evidence-based employment
services, coordination with
mental health and substance
use recovery treatment, and/or
other services to increase
housing retention.
Distribute HHAP funding to qualifying
programs providing evidence-based
services to increase housing
retention.
• Successful exits from permanent
housing programs.
o HMIS data shows positive change
in income from program
enrollment to case closure.
o Average length of time enrolled in
a RRH/RA program from initial
placement to case closure.
14. Sustain, as feasible, existing
permanent housing programs
for people with disabling
conditions and the elderly at
risk of housing loss due to
federal policy changes.
Provide temporary rental
assistance for other qualifying
households whose HUD
program eligibility has been
terminated.
Work with coordinated entry system
and local housing authority to
develop short-term plan to address
anticipated loss of federal housing
vouchers.
• Count of households impacted by
HUD policy changes.
• Count of qualifying households
offered short-term rental assistance.
• Count of new enrollments into the
HMIS system whose prior living
situation was a rental by client, with
ongoing housing subsidy [HMIS Field #
435]
Count of households
experiencing first time
homelessness.
Proportion with prior federal
housing subsidies.
Success Measure 4, HHAP-6 Eligible Expenditures:
• Rental assistance, rapid rehousing, and other programs prioritizing households with income at or below 30 percent of the area median income. • Service coordination, including access to workforce, education, and training programs or other services needed to promote housing stability.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
607
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – STRATEGIC APPROACH
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 26
Success Measure 4: Reduce the number of individuals experiencing homelessness (Children and Youth) Key Actions: 2.c, 3.c., A.1, A.2
Strategy Activity Tracking Success Performance Measure
15. Leverage existing children and
youth services programs,
including child welfare and
safety net systems of care.
Create transitional housing plans for
all children and youth exiting foster
care system or wardship. Work in
partnership with SJCoC to identify
eligible programs for HHAP funds.
• Partnership with local Child Welfare
program administrator and services.
• Guidance developed regarding
income stabilization.
Reduced incidence of and
returns to homelessness
among children and youth as
measured through PIT Count
and annual HDIS system
performance reports.
Improved parity in
experiences across
race/ethnicity and as
consistent with the
demographic proportion of
the county population.
16. Expand investments in
transitional housing programs
for youth which offer intensive
wrap-around support services
for youth launching into adult-
hood without supports from a
parent or guardian.
Distribute HHAP funding to qualifying
transitional housing programs
providing evidence-based services to
children and youth.
• Enrollments to THPs.
• Average length of time enrolled
• THP clients closed with placement
• THP clients closed with increased
self-sufficiency.
17. Provide short term rental
assistance vouchers to young
adult headed households.
Work in partnership with children’s
services to create RRH/RA policies
that provide clear guidance on
assistance eligibility and assessment
benchmarks for success &/or need
for escalating interventions.
• Youth enrollments to Rental
Assistance program.
• Average length of time enrolled in RA
• Youth-RA clients closed successfully
• Youth-RA clients closed with
increased self-sufficiency.
Success Measure 4, HHAP-6 Eligible Expenditures:
• Qualifying transitional housing / group living programs providing pro-social and developmental supports for eligible youth. • Rental assistance, and other programs prioritizing TAY households with income at or below 30 percent of the area median income, and who have prior experience with the child welfare, justice, of mental health care system, pursuing education or employment, and are without natural social supports (alone).
• Service coordination, including access to workforce, education, and training programs or other services needed to promote housing stability.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
608
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – FUNDING PLAN
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 27
IX. FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
HHAP-6 Funding Plan
Through this Action Plan Update, the County of San Joaquin, the City of Stockton, and the San Joaquin County Continuum of Care agree to the collective allocation of Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Round 6 funds:
Proposed Eligible Uses Proposed County /
SJCoC Allocations
Proposed City of
Stockton Allocations
Permanent Housing (18%)
• Rapid Rehousing
• Services and Coordination
$2,009,978.18
• $1,004,989.09
• $1,004,989.09
$2,075,721.62
• $1,037,860.81
• $1,037,860.81
Homeless Prevention (18%)
• Diversion Programs
• Prevention Programs
$2,009,978.18
• $1,004,989.09
• $1,004,989.09
$2,075,721.62
• $1,037,860.81
• $1,037,860.81
Interim Housing (46%)
• Operating Costs
• Enhanced Services
$5,136,610.89
• $2,568,305.45
• $2,568,305.45
$5,304,621.92
• $2,652,310.96
• $2,652,310.96
Youth Set Aside (10%)
• Homeless Prevention
• Interim Housing
$1,116,654.54
• $279,163.64
• $837,490.91
$1,153,178.68
• $288,294.67
• $864,884.01
Administration (8%)
• Management (7%)
• HMIS (1%)
$ 893,323.63
• $781,658.18
• $111,665.45
$ 922,542.94
• $807,225.08
• $115,317.87
Total $11,166,545.42 $11,531,786.79
The HHAP 6 budget does not propose spending on any of the following uses:
New interim housing
Non-housing solutions
ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES
The region is anticipating lower allocations through HOME, CDBG, and ESG program funds in 2026.
The region is preparing for major policy changes regarding eligibility and lower reimbursements through Medi- Cal, SSI/SSP, CalFresh, and various HUD housing and voucher programs in 2026.
The region will leverage local public safety, probation realignment, and behavioral health services funding to the extent possible to expand and enhance street outreach activities and other non-housing solutions.
The region will apply for state and federal grants to address encampments and build affordable housing.
SJCoC will seek local philanthropy to continue its stipend program for people with lived experiences.
The region is working closely with managed care providers to stabilize reimbursable services through street outreach and interim shelter programs.
San Joaquin County Human Services Agency has directed program units responsible for in-home supportive services, adult protective services, child welfare, childcare and development, and employment support services to work closely with the homeless continuum of care.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
609
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – FUNDING PLAN
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 28
HHAP-6 FUNDING PLAN: BY ELIGIBLE USE CATEGORY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Key Actions HHAP 6 Budget Eligible Use Category SPM (OUTCOME GOAL)
1.a. Permanent Housing $ 2,042,849.90 Rapid Rehousing / Rental Subsidies SPM4. Increasing the Number of People Exiting Homelessness into Permanent Housing
1.b. Permanent Housing $ 2,042,849.90 Permanent Housing Services and Service Coordination
SPM4. Increasing the Number of People Exiting Homelessness into Permanent Housing
2.a. Homeless Prevention $ 2,042,849.90 Problem Solving and Diversion Programs
SPM3. Reducing first time instances of homelessness for those exiting institutional settings, including, but not limited to jails, prisons, and hospitals.
2.b. Homeless Prevention $ 2,042,849.90 Rapid Rehousing / Rental Subsidies SPM6. Reducing the number of individuals who return to homelessness after exiting homelessness into permanent housing.
3.a. Provide Interim Housing $ 5,220,616.41 Navigation Centers SPM2. Decreasing the number of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness
3.b. Provide Interim Housing $ 5,220,616.41 Interim Housing Services and Service Coordination
SPM5. Decreasing the average length of time that people experience homelessness while accessing services.
4.a Non-Housing Solution $ - Street outreach teams with intensive case management
SPM7. Number of people with successful placements from street outreach projects
4.b Non-Housing Solution $ - Stipends for people with lived experiences.
SPM 1-7. Reducing disparities across system performance measures.
2.c. Youth Set Aside
Homeless Prevention
$ 567,458.31 YSA -Homeless Prevention through Rapid Rehousing / Rental Subsidies
SPM4. Increasing the Number of People Exiting Homelessness into Permanent Housing
3.c. Youth Set Aside Interim
Housing
$ 1,702,374.92 YSA -Permanent Housing Services and Service Coordination
SPM2. Decreasing the number of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness
A.1. Administrative Costs $ 1,588,883.25 Administrative Costs SPM1. Decreasing the number of people accessing services who are experiencing homelessness
A.2. Administrative Costs $ 226,983.32 HMIS Costs SPM 1-7. Reducing disparities across system performance measures.
Total Allocations $ 22,698,332.21
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
610
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – FUNDING PLAN
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 29
Sustaining the Region’s Interim Housing Portfolio
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
611
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – APPENDIX
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 30
PLAN TO SUSTAIN SHELTER OPERATIONS
1. Total Existing Interim Housing
• 1,346, per the 2025 Housing Inventory Count.
2. Total Beds to be Added During the Grant Term
• 588, for a new total of 1,934 beds by the end of 2026.
3. Total Estimated Capital and Operating Costs during the Grant Term Capital Costs: $0, ongoing
• Funding from HHAP 1, HHAP 2, and HHAP 3 were allocated for construction purposes. Additional funding was leveraged through the American Rescue Plan Act, and various local sources. Construction is in final stages.
Annual Operating Costs:
• $14,899,293.89, annually (low range @ $21.11 per bed/day) • $28,166,019.51, annually (mid range @ $39.90 per bed/day)
Basis for estimate:
• Low range is based on a 5% cost of living adjustment from initial planned rate of $15 per bed/day. May not be indicative of the costs of a service enriched program. • National Low Income Housing Coalition Estimate (2021) $43.84 per/day • City of Los Angeles’ reimbursement rate (2024) $80 per/day • CalWORKs Homeless Assistance rate (2025) $85 per/day for up to 16 days.
4. Total Funding Sources Identified
Annually
3-year Budget
FY: 26/27, 27/28, 28/29
Estimated Cost $ 14,899,293.89 $ 44,697,881.67
Revenues
HHAP 4 $ 1,338,840.68 $ 4,016,522.04 HHAP 5 $ 1,500,544.54 $ 4,501,633.62 HHAP 6 $ 3,480,410.94 $ 10,441,232.82
HHAP 7 $ 1,740,205.47 $ 5,220,616.41 Federal ESG Funding $ 500,000.00 $ 1,500,000.00 MediCal Revenue $ 3,000,000.00 $ 9,000,000.00 BHS, VA, and Primary Care $ 3,000,000.00 $ 9,000,000.00 Donations $ 400,000.00 $ 1,200,000.00 Total Planned Revenue $ 14,960,001.63 $ 44,880,004.89
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
612
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – APPENDIX
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 31
X. APPENDICES
A. Public Meetings Invitation Flyer
B. Public Meeting Press Release
C. Community Survey Instrument
D. Key Action Project Descriptions
E. Cal-ICH Guidance for Encampment Resolution Planning
F. Encampment Resolution Plan Maps
G. Model Ordinance
H. HHAP Round 6: Other Requirements
I. Memorandum of Understanding
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
613
Community Planning Meetings
To Update the County’s Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan
Join us for a community meeting to discuss homelessness needs, services, and prevention in San Joaquin County. You'll hear updates on the use of Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) funds to prevent and reduce homelessness. You will have an opportunity to provide input on improving programs for individuals and families experiencing homelessness. We will discuss:
• Encampment resolution strategies
• Homelessness prevention and diversion
• Operating expenses for existing shelters and temporary-stay programs • Affordable and safe housing options for very low-income individuals and families
We are counting on your voice to guide local priorities .
Join us at any of the meetings listed below.
City Date Time Address
Tracy Wed. May 14th 10am - Noon City Hall - 333 Civic Center Plaza Stockton Tues. May 20th 3pm - 5pm Behavioral Health - 1212 N. California St.
Stockton Thurs. May 22nd 5pm - 7pm Civic Auditorium - 525 N Center St.
Manteca Tues. May 27th 3:30pm - 5:30pm Manteca City Hall - 1001 W. Center St.
Stockton Tues. May 27th 5pm - 7pm Arnold Rue CC - 5758 Lorriane Ave.
Lodi Tues. May 28th 1pm - 3pm Hutchins Street Square - 125 S Hutchins St Stockton Thurs. May 29th 5pm - 7pm Van Buskirk CC - 734 Houston Ave
Meeting accessibility is important. Please contact us at [email protected] to discuss accessibility.
Translation assistance is available upon request. Families are welcome.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
614
MEDIA ADVISORY
May 13, 2025
Contacts:
Hilary Crowley, Public Information Officer
San Joaquin County
[email protected] / (209) 468-2997
Connie Cochran, Community Relations Officer
City of Stockton
(209) 937-8212
San Joaquin County Human Services Agency and Local Partners to Host Community Meetings on County’s Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan Updates and Receive Public Feedback
Who:
San Joaquin County Human Services Agency
San Joaquin Homeless Services Continuum of Care
What:
Community Planning Meetings to Update the County’s Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
615
When and Where:
• Wednesday, May 14, 2025 – 10:00 a.m. – Noon
333 Civic Center Plaza, Room 203, Tracy, CA
• Tuesday, May 20, 2025 – 3:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
1212 N. California Street, Stockton, CA
• Thursday, May 22, 2025 – 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.
525 N. Center Street, Stockton, CA
• Tuesday, May 27, 2025 – 3:30 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
1001 W. Center Street, Manteca, CA
• May 27, 2025 – 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.
5758 Lorraine Avenue, Stockton, CA
• Wednesday May 28, 2025 – 1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
125 S. Hutchins Street, Lodi, CA
• Thursday, May 29, 2025 – 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.
734 Houston Avenue, Stockton, CA
Why:
The community meetings will be held to discuss homelessness needs, services, and prevention in San Joaquin County. Residents will hear updates on the use of Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention funds to prevent and reduce homelessness. The community will have an opportunity to provide input on improving programs for individuals and families experiencing homelessness.
Discussion items will include:
• Encampment resolution strategies
• Homelessness prevention and diversion
• Operating expenses for existing shelters and temporary-stay programs • Affordable and safe housing options for very low-income individuals and families
Families are welcome. Translation assistance is available upon request.
Contact [email protected] to discuss accessibility.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
616
SAN JOAQUIN
CONTINUUM OF CARE
May 2025 SURVEY
HHAP 6 Needs Survey
The County of San Joaquin and the City of Stockton are working together to apply for state funding through the Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Program – Round 6.
Your input will help shape how San Joaquin County and the City of Stockton prioritize resources for homelessness solutions. This short survey asks for your perspective on local needs and the most effective strategies.
1. Please select the city/neighborhood where you reside:
Lodi ☐ Lathrop ☐ Tracy
Manteca ☐ French Camp ☐ Ripon / Escalon
☐ Stockton ☐ Mountain House ☐ Other, county unincorporated If Stockton was selected,
which region: ☐ North ☐ Central ☐ South
2. Have you ever experienced homelessness? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, would you describe yourself as someone who is:
☐ Youth (under 24) ☐ Domestic Violence Survivor ☐ Other:
☐ Veteran ☐ Currently homeless
3. Do you currently work in this field? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please select agency type below:
☐ Local Government ☐ Non-profit or faith-based organization ☐ Health-Care or Behavioral Health
(including Managed Care Plan Providers)
☐ Program for homeless individuals (e.g. outreach,
emergency shelter, case management, etc.)
☐ Housing provider (developer or operator) for
formerly homeless individuals
☐ Other:
4. Select your top 2 funding priorities (where we should allocate the most resources):
☐ Construction of new homeless housing
☐ Temporary rental assistance vouchers
☐ Additional emergency shelters
☐ Funding to provide services at existing shelters
☐ Intensive street outreach / encampment resolution
☐ Innovative housing programs
☐ Services for youth experiencing homelessness (under 24) DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
617
SAN JOAQUIN
CONTINUUM OF CARE
May 2025 SURVEY
5. Please select up to 2 investments to strengthen local Outreach Services:
☐ Case management or navigation support
☐ Linkages to mental health or substance use treatments ☐ Street-based healthcare
☐ Trauma response teams
☐ Connection to employment or job training program
6. Please select up to 2 investments to strengthen local Emergency Shelters:
☐ Safe and clean facilities
☐ Provide 24/7 access and programming
☐ Staff trained in trauma-informed care
☐ Services for youth, families, or survivors of DV
☐ Case managers on-site
☐ Pets allowed (crates or kennels on site)
☐ Privacy or individual rooms ☐ On-site hot meal program
7. Please select up to 2 investments to strengthen local Housing Solutions:
☐ Short-term rental or move-in assistance ☐ Help finding landlords willing to rent
☐ On-site supportive services (e.g., case
management)
☐ Specialty housing for veterans, youth, people in
recovery, or other vulnerable groups
☐ Permanent housing programs
(e.g., supportive housing for people with
permanent disabilities)
☐ Job training, benefit management, or other
self-sufficiency programming for residents
8. Are there any other comments or ideas you wish to share with us?
Thank you for your input!
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
618
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – APPENDIX
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 37
HHAP-6 FUNDING PLAN: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OTHER LEVERAGED RESOURCES Key Actions Eligible Use Category Description of Project HHAP-6 and Other Leveraged Resources
1.a. Permanent Housing Rapid Rehousing / Rental
Subsidies
RRH / RA vouchers for homeless households. Eligibility and priority for a voucher is determined through the Coordinated Entry System.
* Short and Medium Term RRH Vouchers for qualified households. * Flexible RA vouchers for qualified individuals to live in shared or group housing * Landlord incentives or other one-time costs associated with moving.
HHAP - 6, HUD
HUD allocations through the
CoC Program Competition and
to HASJC (cuts anticipated)
1.b. Permanent Housing Permanent Housing
Services and Service
Coordination
Comprehensive case management, services, and supports that work with clients towards an ultimate goal of housing stability and a pathway towards permanent self-sufficiency, consistent with realistic and feasible case plan objectives and goals envisioned by each client.
HHAP - 6, HUD
HUD allocations through the
CoC Program Competition and
to HASJC (cuts anticipated)
2.a. Homeless
Prevention
Problem Solving and
Diversion Programs
Prevention and diversion programs that prevent people at risk of or recently experiencing homelessness from entering unsheltered or sheltered homelessness. * Residential and non-residential rehabilitation/reunification programs for 6 -24 months depending on assessed need and case plan by probation officer, officer of the court, or other County approved case manager.
* Programs must meet applicable standards and pass inspections to participate. * Programs must have appropriate services to provide a pathway for client self sufficiency.
HHAP - 6, Public Safety
Realignment, CARE Act Funds,
Medi-Cal Program funds.
2.b. Homeless
Prevention
Rapid Rehousing / Rental
Subsidies
RRH / RA vouchers for individuals at risk of returning to homelessness following a placement in a permanent supportive housing or other permanent affordable housing program.
* Eligible applicants were previously homeless or at risk of homelessness and placed through the Housing Authority, BHS, CES, or other permanent housing program provider HHAP – 6
(in the event of federal cuts to
the local permanent housing
voucher programs)
3.a. Provide Interim
Housing
Navigation Centers Funds ongoing operating costs (including staffing, supplies, maintenance, overhead, etc.) for service enriched emergency shelter programs and navigation centers. Must be low- barrier and trauma informed.
HHAP - 6, MHSA/BHSA
3.b. Provide Interim
Housing
Interim Housing Services
and Service Coordination
Funding for intensive case management services and supports including housing navigation, transportation, and recovery and rehabilitation programs, and education and training for workforce development. Must be low-barrier and trauma informed.
HHAP - 6, Medi-Cal Programs,
MHSA/BHSA
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
619
2025 REGIONAL HOMELESS ACTION PLAN – APPENDIX
HOMELESSNESS ACTION PLAN UPDATE AUGUST 2025 | 38
Key Actions Eligible Use Category Description of Project HHAP-6 and Other Leveraged Resources
4.a Non-Housing
Solution
Street outreach teams
with intensive case
management (leveraged
resources)
Leverage funding for Co-response partnerships between SJC Behavioral Health Teams and local law enforcement. Includes additional allocations to support community based organizations to conduct intensive engagement activities and ensure basic needs are met, especially in the event of a weather-related emergency to prevent imminent risk to health and wellbeing.
Public Safety Realignment,
MHSA/BHSA, Local and
municipal allocations through
public works, police, and other
locally funded street outreach
crews.
4.b Non-Housing
Solution
Stipends for people with
lived experiences.
(leveraged resources)
Leverage funding to provide stipends, transportation assistance, and advocacy to ensure that the voices of people with lived experience are heard.
Local investments
2.c. Youth Set Aside
Homeless Prevention
YSA -Homeless Prevention
through Rapid Rehousing /
Rental Subsidies
RRH / RA vouchers for youth ages 18-24. Eligibility and priority for a voucher is determined through the Coordinated Entry System. These funds represent a special set-aside fund for Youth RRH/RA vouchers and may not be used for a non-qualifying household. * Short and Medium Term RRH Vouchers for qualified households. * Flexible RA vouchers for qualified individuals to live in shared or group housing * Landlord incentives or other one time costs associated with moving.
HHAP - 6, SSI, Child Welfare
Services, Medi-Cal Program,
HUD YHDP
3.c. Youth Set Aside
Interim Housing
YSA -Permanent Housing
Services and Service
Coordination
Comprehensive case management, services, and supports that work with clients towards an ultimate goal of housing stability and a pathway towards permanent self-sufficiency, consistent with realistic and feasible case plan objectives and goals envisioned by each client.
* Eligible applicants include Youth Transitional Housing Providers and other Housing Providers serving youth 18-24 and/or unaccompanied minors.
HHAP - 6, Child Welfare
Services, MHSA/BHSA
A.1. Administrative
Costs
Administrative Costs Costs associated with the administration and coordination of the CoC, supporting regional partnership and collaboration through the CoC Committees, and contract performance monitoring. Allocations also to support the work of the CES Lead agency in conducting and facilitating case conferencing and placement meetings with applicable housing providers.
Other costs may include technical assistance and support for PIT count administration, contract management and reporting, public communications, and program and system evaluation.
HHAP 6, HUD-ESG
A.2. Administrative
Costs
HMIS Costs An allocation to cover expenses associated with the administration of HMIS. Accurate data will help outreach teams in their communication with homeless individuals and provide service partners information on effect and impact of activities, especially regarding impact on clients and whether efforts are achieving desired results in an equitable fashion.
HHAP 6, HUD-ESG, CoC
Program Competition
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
620
The State of California encourages local jurisdictions to continue to employ person- centered, Housing First, and trauma-informed approaches when addressing the needs of persons living in encampments on public property. These evidence-based practices ensure services are strategically coordinated and deployed prior to any enforcement effort and ensure the best possible outcomes for all involved.
Before removing an encampment on public property, Cal ICH recommends that a local government:
GUIDANCE:GUIDANCE:
ADDRESSINGADDRESSING
ENCAMPMENTSENCAMPMENTS
(916) 651-2820 www.bcsh.ca.gov/calich/ [email protected] Is actively aware of interim housing capacity, including congregate and non-congregate shelter (i.e. motel vouchers), that is immediately available to serve persons in the encampment in question.
Has a clear policy for the handling and storage of unattended personal belongings of persons in encampments.
Provides as much advance notice of a removal action as possible. Cal ICH recommends a minimum of 48
hours notice, unless imminent threats to life, health, safety, or infrastructure require a shorter notice period, to persons living in the encampment and to any service provider actively serving and/or engaging with the encampment in question. Cal ICH recommends that the notice include:
The anticipated date and time of the removal action.
Information on services, including shelter, that are immediately available to persons living in the encampment.
Information on how unattended belongings will be handled the day of the removal action, including what will be stored and how they can be recovered.
Where an encampment presents specific safety hazards, it may be appropriate for a local government to remediate those hazards prior to or independent of a removal operation, for example addressing tapped electrical wires, removing dangerous items including apparatuses involving open flames, weapons, and controlled substances, or dismantling or removing structures within an encampment that pose a specific hazard.
Cal ICH further recommends that local governments are actively aware of and engaging with current local projects and/or efforts (i.e. Encampment Resolution Funds) serving the encampment in question and encampments in general.
Cal ICH encourages local governments to make every effort to identify and offer shelter to persons living in
an encampment in advance of taking action to remove an encampment. If shelter cannot be secured prior to removal despite these efforts, it’s recommended that a local government ensure that there are reasonably accessible locations within the jurisdiction where a person may lawfully sleep.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
621
THE GOVERNOR’S THE GOVERNOR’S
MODEL ORDINACE:MODEL ORDINACE:
THOUGHTFULTHOUGHTFUL
IMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATION
MATTERSMATTERS
(916) 651-2820 www.bcsh.ca.gov/calich/ [email protected] Q. If they can’t sleep “here”, where can they sleep?
A. The Model Encampment Ordinance underscores a basic principle: enforcement must be paired with shelter. But asking someone to move without a real alternative only shifts the crisis. Local governments must plan
ahead—identifying safe, accessible, and legal places to go before any encampment action occurs.
This may include
indoor shelter or, when necessary, designated safe camping areas.
Cal ICH supports communities in aligning enforcement with housing solutions—so people aren’t just moved, they’re supported.
Q. What is a reasonable offer of shelter?
A. All shelter beds are not the same. A reasonable offer meets a person’s individual needs:
– A private room for a trauma survivor
– ADA access for someone using a wheelchair
– A place where partners and children are welcome
Reasonable offers increase the likelihood of acceptance and lead to better outcomes.
Cal ICH encourages local teams to lead with dignity, ensuring every offer is made with thoughtfulness and care.
Q. What meaningful services should be included on the notice? A. Posting notice is more than a legal requirement, it’s an opportunity to connect. Notices should include:
✔ How to access shelter and services
✘ Avoid long, generic resource lists with no connection to available support Notices are most effective when they offer timely, real options for immediately available shelter.
Q. What items should be stored?
A. People's belongings are often all they have. Treat them that way. Use the “mom test”: If your mom owned it, would you want it saved? This includes:
– ID cards, prescriptions, glasses
– Photos, documents, mobility aids
Hazardous or illegal items should be handled separately, but most items deserve secure, respectful storage.
Q. Who should be onsite for enforcement actions?
A. Who’s present matters. When outreach teams, housing navigators, and service providers are part of the process, trust builds and outcomes improve. Enforcement should be a bridge to housing—not a barrier.
Are you a city or county in need of support developing or implementing a local ordinance? Cal ICH is here to help communities implement humane, housing-focused strategies. Contact us at [email protected].
On May 12, 2025, Governor Newsom
released a Model Encampment Ordinance
for communities to use as a framework to
address encampments with urgency and
dignity. The Model Encampment
Ordinance references this Cal ICH
Guidance to Addressing Encampments,
which has been updated as of May 20,
2025, to expand on and offer clarification
to important points within the Model
Encampment Ordinance.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
622
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
623
GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM • SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • (916) 445-2841
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
Model Ordinance: Addressing Encampments with Urgency and Dignity
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson clarified that officials can take reasonable actions to clear encampments, the Governor signed Executive Order N-1-24, which directed state agencies to develop policies to prioritize addressing encampments on state property while providing reasonable advance notice and partnering with shelter and services providers.
That Executive Order also encouraged local governments to adopt similar policies, and to use all available resources and infrastructure, including the historic resources provided by the State, to take urgent action to humanely remove encampments from public spaces. And the Governor directed the California Interagency Council on Homelessness to create guidance, published here, for local governments to follow in creating and implementing those programs.
This model ordinance is intended to provide a starting point that jurisdictions may build from and adjust in creating their own policies. It draws from the state’s proven and workable approach — an approach that, between July 2021 and May 2025, has cleared more than 16,000 encampments and over 311,873 cubic yards of debris from sites along the state right of way. These results demonstrate that the policy is both effective and scalable, offering a sound, adoptable framework for jurisdictions to resolve encampments with urgency and dignity.
This model ordinance is not intended to be comprehensive or to impose a one-size-fits-all approach for every city. Tailoring is expected and appropriate to account for local differences and priorities. For example, a jurisdiction may choose to restrict camping at all times in certain sensitive locations, such as near schools; limit camping to no more than one night in the same location; or require a longer notice period before removal. While specific policies may vary, all local approaches should reflect three basic principles embodied in this model:
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
624
• No person should face criminal punishment for sleeping outside when they have nowhere else to go. Policies that prohibit individuals from sleeping outside anywhere in the jurisdiction without offering adequate indoor shelter, effectively banishing homeless individuals from the jurisdiction’s borders, are both inhumane and impose externalities on neighboring jurisdictions, which must face the costs and challenges of an increased unsheltered homeless population.
• Encampment policies must prioritize shelter and services and ensure that people experiencing homelessness and their belongings are treated with respect.
• Policies must not unduly limit local authority to clear encampments.
Officials must be able to enforce common-sense policies to protect the health and safety of their residents and maintain their public spaces.
When officials lack appropriate tools, encampments persist, endangering the health and safety of those living in and alongside them.
There is no compassion in abandoning Californians to the dangers and indignities of encampments. Encampments pose a serious public safety risk, often causing fires and exposing encampment residents to increased risk of sexual violence and criminal activity, to property damage and break-ins, and unsanitary conditions affecting both residents and neighbors. And they dampen and deter both commercial and recreational activity through the accumulation of hazardous material and excessive debris, harming downtowns and depriving Californians of their public spaces. Large encampments and those with semi- permanent structures exacerbate and perpetuate these harms. Every local government must have a plan to address them.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
625
Model Ordinance [For Local Customization]
Section XX1. Encampments
Unless authorized by permit or other applicable law, it is unlawful:
(a) To construct, place, or maintain on public property any semi-permanent structure, including but not limited to hand-built sheds and structures with metal or other heavy roofing and siding materials, for the purpose of sheltering one or more persons.
(b) To camp on public property, including but not limited to using, placing or maintaining a tent, sleeping bag, blanket, or other materials for the purpose of sleeping, lying, or sheltering one or more persons for more than three consecutive days or nights in the same location. For purposes this section, the same location shall mean within 200 feet of the location in which the person camped on the previous day or night.
(c) To camp within 200 feet of any posted notice to vacate or other official signage designating a location for encampment clearance or otherwise prohibiting sitting, sleeping, lying, camping, or placing personal property in that location.
(d) To sit, sleep, lie, or camp on any public street, road, or bike path, or on any sidewalk in a manner that impedes passage within the meaning of the American Disabilities Act.
Section XX2. Enforcement
(a) Except in exigent circumstances involving an imminent threat to life, safety, health, or infrastructure, each of the following shall be satisfied prior to the enforcement of section XX1:
(i) City officials, or any agent acting on their behalf, shall make every reasonable effort to identify and offer shelter at an emergency shelter, navigation center, or other appropriate housing, and to offer supportive services, to persons living in the encampment. (ii) City officials, or any agent acting on their behalf, shall post a notice to vacate in a prominent location at the encampment site at least 48 hours prior to the enforcement action. That notice shall include, at a minimum:
(1) The anticipated date and time of the enforcement action DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
626
(2) Information on services, including shelter, that are immediately available to persons living in the encampment (3) Information on how unattended belongings will be handled the day of the enforcement action, including what will be stored, how they can be recovered, and the date by which they must be claimed.
(iii) No enforcement operations shall begin earlier than the date and time on the notice to vacate. If the enforcement work does not begin within two days of the date written on the notice, a new notice must be posted a minimum of 48 hours before enforcement operations may begin.
(b) Where exigent circumstances require less than 48 hours’ notice prior to enforcement of section XX1:
(i) City officials, or any agent acting on their behalf, shall provide as much advance notice of enforcement as reasonably possible under the circumstances; and
(ii) As soon as reasonably possible following enforcement action, city officials or any agent acting on their behalf shall post notice at or near the encampment site describing where items taken during the enforcement action are stored, how they can be recovered, and the date by which they must be claimed.
(c) Personal belongings collected at the encampment site that are not a health or safety hazard shall be collected, tagged, and stored for not less than 60 days following an enforcement action.
(i) “Personal belongings” includes:
(1) items of apparent value of $50 or more
(2) items of apparent personal value, including, but not limited to: eyeglasses, operational wheelchairs, walkers, crutches, other medical equipment, habitable tents, personal papers (such as photographs, albums, ID's, bank statements, and legal papers), backpacks, containers, and operational
bicycles, scooters, and strollers.
(ii) Items that constitute a health and safety risk and will not be collected include, but are not limited to:
(1) Toxic sharps: needles, scissors, knives.
(2) Chemicals: bleach, paint, oils, etc.
(3) Items (including bedding and clothing) soiled by infectious materials, including human waste and bodily fluids.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
627
(4) Moldy, mildewed items.
(5) Items that may be infested by rodents and insects: rats, mice, fleas, lice, bed bugs.
(6) Items that pose a risk of fire or explosion, combustibles and propane tanks; any item containing fuel or corrosives or other unidentified liquids.
(7) Backpacks and closed containers that have been
determined by an individual licensed to identify and handle hazardous materials to contain items listed in (1)-(6) above or (iii) below. Such backpacks and closed containers may be discarded where no individual licensed in hazardous
materials is present to make a determination.
(8) If personal belongings are co-mingled or littered with needles, human waste, or other health risks, the entire pile of
belongings may be disposed of. The presence of clothing in a backpack or container shall not be the sole reason to discard the backpack or container.
(iii) Bulky items such as mattresses and sheds, perishable items such as food, controlled substances, contraband, and trash or debris will not be collected and stored. Contraband and controlled
substances should be handled by trained professionals and consistent with applicable law.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or prohibit city officials from enforcing any other city or state laws, including, but not limited to, laws governing use of controlled substances or weapons, fire codes, and public nuisance laws.
Section XX3. Regulations
(a) The [relevant department or agency] shall issue regulations or guidelines necessary to aid in the implementation or enforcement of this chapter.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
628
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
CITY OF STOCKTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HUMAN
SERVICES AGENCY
This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (“MOU”), effec�ve the date the last party to this MOU signs, is entered into by and among the City of Stockton, through its Economic Development Department (EDD), and the County of San Joaquin, through its Human Services Agency (HSA), with reference to and considera�on of the following:
WHEREAS, like many other regions in California, the County of San Joaquin has seen a rapid and troubling growth in the homeless population over the past several years, a condition that has been difficult to address given the increased rates of persons with untreated addictive disorders involving substance abuse and mental health conditions, the high cost of housing and property in the area, and the shortage of emergency, transitional, and affordable housing available in the County to serve this population;
WHEREAS, consistent with the CoC Program Interim Rule, the CoC was formed in 1996 as the group organized to carry out the Continuum of Care program authorized by regulation [under subtitle C of title IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11381–11389)] and, as required, the CoC includes representative groups from within the geographic borders of San Joaquin County;
WHEREAS, San Joaquin County serves as the Collaborative Applicant for the CoC pursuant to a Collaborative Applicant Memorandum of Understanding to apply for and administer state and federal grants allocated directly to the CoC including CoC Program grants, and support the year -round CoC planning of homeless housing, services, and prevention;
WHEREAS, the City of Stockton is a municipality with a population over 320,000 people and also receive s annual and periodic entitlement funding from the state and federal government for addressing homelessness , with these funds received, administered, and monitored by the City of Stockton Economic Development Department;
WHEREAS, On February 28, 2025, the State of California invited counties, Continuums of Care, and certain cities to apply for funds pursuant to HHAP Round 6, a program authorized by Assembly Bill 166 (2023-2024), to provide local jurisdictions with flexible funding to continue efforts to improve regional and systems coordination to prevent and end homelessness in their communicates, in a manner that reflects the state’s priorities to prevent and expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness through homelessness prevention activities, sustaining existing interim housing solutions, and permanent housing solutions, including long-term sustainability of affordable permanent supportive housing [§ 50243 (a)].
WHEREAS, to apply for HHAP Round 6 funding, applicants must jointly create, or up d at e , a compliant Regionally Coordinated Homeless Action Plan and a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by each participating applicant committing to participate in and comply with the Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan;
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
629
WHEREAS, the County, CoC, the City of Stockton jointly engaged in a regional strategic planning process to create a Regionally Coordinated Homeless Action Plan in 2024 and have conducted a thorough public planning process to update the Action Plan in 2025 that included seven public meetings, held at diverse times and locations throughout the county;
The Parties agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
1.1 Statutory Requirement: The Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Ac�on Plan shall be reflected in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) commi�ng each signatory to par�cipa�on in, and to comply with, the Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Ac�on Plan as updated August 2025.
2. COMITTMENTS
Each Party to t his MOU hereby commits to uphold, participate in, and comply with the actions, roles, and responsibilities assigned to it as described in the HHAP -6 Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan Update and summarized below.
2.1 Each Party commits to the roles and responsibilities as they pertain to outreach and site coordination, siting and use of available public land, the development of interim and permanent housing options, and coordinating, connecting, and delivering services to individuals experiencing homelessness or at risk of experiencing homelessness, within the region.
2.2 Each Party commits to Key Actions to improve the system performance measures.
2.3 Each Party commits to Key Actions to ensure racial and gender equity in service delivery, housing placements, housing retention, and any other means to affirm equitable access to housing and services for racial and ethnic groups overrepresented among residents experiencing homelessness.
2.4 Each Party c ommits to actions to reduce homelessness among individuals exiting institutional settings, including but not limited to jails, prisons, hospitals, and any other institutions such as foster care, behavioral health facilities, etc. as applicable in the region.
2.5 Each Party c ommits to roles in the utilization of local, state, and federal funding programs to end homelessness.
2.6 Each Party c ommits to the roles and responsibilities to connect individuals to wrap- around services from all eligible federal, state, and local benefit programs.
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
630
3. MISCELLANEOUS
3.1 Notice. Any notices provided to any Party in connection with this MOU shall be directed as follows:
City of Stockton,
Economic Development Director
Tina McCarty
[email protected]
County of San Joaquin,
Human Services Agency Director
Chris Woods
[email protected]
3.2 Parties as Independent Contractors. Each Party is, and at all times shall be deemed to be, independent of the other Parties. Nothing herein is intended or shall be construed as creating the relationship of employer and employee, or principal and agent, between any Party, or any Party's agents or employees. Each Party shall retain all authority for rendition of services, standards of performance, control of personnel, and other matters incident to the performance of the Program pursuant to this MOU. Each Party, and its agents and employees, shall not be considered to be employees of any other Party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Par�es to this MOU have caused the same to be executed by each of their duly authorized officers as follows:
City of Stockton
Will Crew
Ac�ng City Manager
San Joaquin County
Chris Woods
Director, Human Services Agency
Date: Date:
City Atorney
Approved to Form
County Counsel
Approved to Form
Date: Date:
DRAFT Public Review:
8/1/2025
ATTACHMENT C
631
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
CITY OF STOCKTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HUMAN
SERVICES AGENCY
This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (“MOU”), effective the date the last party to this MOU signs, is entered into by and among the City of Stockton, through its Economic Development Department (EDD), and the County of San Joaquin, through its Human Services Agency (HSA), with reference to and consideration of the following:
WHEREAS, like many other regions in California, the County of San Joaquin has seen a rapid and troubling growth in the homeless population over the past several years, a condition that has been difficult to address given the increased rates of persons with untreated addictive disorders involving substance abuse and mental health conditions, the high cost of housing and property in the area, and the shortage of emergency, transitional, and affordable housing available in the County to serve this population;
WHER
EAS, consistent with the CoC Program Interim Rule, the CoC was formed in 1996 as the group organized to carry out the Continuum of Care program authorized by regulation [under subtitle C of title IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11381–11389)] and, as required, the CoC includes representative groups from within the geographic borders of San Joaquin County; WHER
EAS, San Joaquin County serves as the Collaborative Applicant for the CoC pursuant to a Collaborative Applicant Memorandum of Understanding to apply for and administer state and federal grants allocated directly to the CoC including CoC Program grants, and support the year-round CoC planning of homeless housing, services, and prevention; WHER
EAS, the City of Stockton is a municipality with a population over 320,000 people and also receive s annual and periodic entitlement funding from the state and federal government for addressing homelessness , with these funds received, administered , and monitored by the City of Stockton Economic Development Department;
WHER
EAS, On February 28, 2025, the State of California invited counties, Continuums of Care, and certain cities to apply for funds pursuant to HHAP Round 6, a program authorized by Assembly Bill 166 (2023-2024), to provide local jurisdictions with flexible funding to continue efforts to improve regional and systems coordination to prevent and end homelessness in their communicates, in a manner that reflects the state’s priorities to prevent and expeditiously reduce unsheltered homelessness through homelessness prevention activities, sustaining existing interim housing solutions, and permanent housing solutions, including long-term sustainability of affordable permanent supportive housing [§ 50243 (a)].
WHER
EAS, to apply for HHAP Round 6 funding, applicants must jointly create, or update, a compliant Regionally Coordinated Homeless Action Plan and a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by each participating applicant committing to participate in and comply with the Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan;
WHER
EAS, the County, CoC, the City of Stockton jointly engaged in a regional strategic planning
ATTACHMENT D
632
process to create a Regionally Coordinated Homeless Action Plan in 2024 and have conducted a thorough public planning process to update the Action Plan in 2025 that included seven public meetings, held at diverse times and locations throughout the county; The Partie
s agree as follows:
1. PURPO
SE OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
1.1 Stat
utory Requirement: The Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan shall be reflected in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) committing each signatory to participation in, and to comply with, the Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan as updated August 2025.
2. COMITTME
NTS
Each Party to t his MOU hereby commits to uphold, participate in, and comply with the actions, roles, and responsibilities assigned to it as described in the HHAP -6 Regionally Coordinated Homelessness Action Plan Update and summarized below.
2.1 Eac
h Party commits to the roles and responsibilities as they pertain to outreach and site coordination, siting and use of available public land, the development of interim and permanent housing options, and coordinating, connecting, and delivering services to individuals experiencing homelessness or at risk of experiencing homelessness, within the region.
2.2 Eac
h Party commits to Key Actions to improve the system performance measures.
2.3 Each
Party commits to Key Actions to ensure racial and gender equity in service delivery, housing placements, housing retention, and any other means to affirm equitable access to housing and services for racial and ethnic groups overrepresented among residents experiencing homelessness.
2.4 Each
Party c ommits to actions to reduce homelessness among individuals exiting institutional settings, including but not limited to jails, prisons, hospitals, and any other institutions such as foster care, behavioral health facilities, etc. as applicable in the region.
2.5 Each
Party c ommits to roles in the utilization of local, state, and federal funding programs to end homelessness.
2.6 Each
Party c ommits to the roles and responsibilities to connect individuals to wrap - around services from all eligible federal, state, and local benefit programs.
3. MISCELLANEOUS
3.1 Notice
. Any notices provided to any Party in connection with this MOU shall be directed as follows:
ATTACHMENT D
633
City of Stockton,
Economic Development Acting Director
Jordan Peterson
Jordan.peterson@stocktonca
.gov
County of San Joaquin,
Human Services Agency Director
Chris Woods
[email protected]
3.2 Par
ties as Independent Contractors. Each Party is, and at all times shall be deemed to be, independent of the other Parties. Nothing herein is intended or shall be construed as creating the relationship of employer and employee, or principal and agent, between any Party, or any Party's agents or employees. Each Party shall retain all authority for rendition of services, standards of performance, control of personnel, and other matters incident to the performance of the Program pursuant to this MOU. Each Party, and its agents and employees, shall not be considered to be employees of any other Party.
IN WI
TNESS WHEREOF, the Parties to this MOU have caused the same to be executed by each of their duly authorized officers as follows:
City of Stockton
Will Crew
Acting City Manager
San Joaquin County
Chris Woods
Director, Human Services Agency
Date: Date:
City
Attorney
Approved to Form
County
Counsel
Approved to Form
Date: Date:
ATTACHMENT D
634
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-0777, Version: 1
APPROVE RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH NEW CLASSIFIED/REPRESENTED CLASSIFICATION
SPECIFICATIONS OF CODE AND HOUSING ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL, PUBLIC SAFETY
TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGER, AND PROPERTY AND RECORDS MANAGER FOR THE
STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED SALARY RANGES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing three new classified/represented classification specifications of Code and Housing Enforcement Official, Public Safety Telecommunications Manager, and Property and Records Manager for the Stockton Police Department (SPD) and assign the salary ranges.
Summary
The City Council is being asked to establish the proposed new single-incumbent classifications titled Code and Housing Enforcement Official, Public Safety Telecommunications Manager, and Property and Records Manager and the proposed salary ranges.
DISCUSSION
Background
In May of 2024, the City Auditor Moss Adams LLP conducted an efficiency study of the SPD’s Animal Shelter. Within the audit recommendation was to separate the existing Police Service Manager classifications into four distinct functional operations and create new classifications specific to each specialized service. The Animal Services Manager was approved by City Council on January 21, 2025. Staff worked with the department and finalized the remaining three proposed management classifications and salary ranges which are being submitted tonight for approval.
Classifications: The proposed Code and Housing Enforcement Official classification is a single, non -sworn management position that will reside within the SPD’s Neighborhood Services Section. If approved, this classification will be included in the Civil Service system and placed in the Mid- Management Level bargaining unit. In addition, this classification will be exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The SPD plans to reclassify the current Police Services Manager overseeing the Neighborhood Services section to this position.
The proposed Public Safety Telecommunications Manager classification is a single, non-sworn management position that will reside within the SPD’s Telecommunications Section of the Support Services Division. If approved, this classification will be included in the Civil Service system and placed in the Mid-Management Level bargaining unit. In addition, this classification will be exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The SPD plans to reclassify the current Police Services Manager overseeing the Telecommunications section to this position.
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
635
File #: 25-0777, Version: 1
The proposed Property and Records Manager classification is a single, non-sworn management position that will reside within the SPD’s Property and Records Section of the Support Services Division. If approved, this classification will be included in the Civil Service system and placed in the Mid-Management Level bargaining unit. In addition, this classification will be exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The SPD plans to reclassify the current Police Services Manager overseeing the Property and Records section to this position.
Salary Ranges: Staff recommend the following annual salary ranges step 1-6:
FY 2025-26 ANNUAL BASE SALARY BY STEP
ClassificationStep 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Code and Housing
Enforcement Official*
$127,121.64 $133,645.22 $140,501.51 $147,691.37 $155,252.12 $163,229.46 Public Safety
Telecommunications
Manager*
$127,121.64 $133,645.22 $140,501.51 $147,691.37 $155,252.12 $163,229.46 Property and
Records Manager*
$115,786.10 $121,727.95 $127,972.87 $134,521.60 $141,409.08 $148,670.74 *Classification does not currently exist on the salary schedule
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The additional costs generated by the new classifications will be funded through the existing FY25-26 SPD Budget. The table below reflects the FY 2025-26 annual salary and benefit costs of the proposed new classifications:
FY 2025-26 TOTAL POSITION EXPENSE
ClassificationStep 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Code and Housing
Enforcement Official*
$207,854.67 $217,662.22 $227,969.97 $238,779.21 $250,146.04 $262,139.17 Public Safety
Telecommunications
Manager*
$207,854.67 $217,662.22 $227,969.97 $238,779.21 $250,146.04 $262,139.17 Property and
Records Manager*
$190,812.82 $199,745.80 $209,134.41 $218,979.77 $229,334.41 $240,251.59 *Classification does not currently exist on the salary schedule City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
636
Resolution No.
STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION TO CREATE NEW CLASSIFIED/REPRESENTED CLASS
SPECIFICATIONS OF CODE AND HOUSING ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL, PUBLIC
SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGER, AND PROPERTY AND RECORDS
MANAGER FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED
SALARY RANGES
It is necessary to establish three new classification s of Code and Housing Enforcement Official, Public Safety Telecommunications Manager, and Property and Records Manager to provide oversight of the Police Department’s key service areas of operation; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The new classified/represented class specifications are hereby created with the salaries approved as follows:
2. The Director of Human Resources is hereby directed to prepare the appropriate class specification in accordance with section 2.36.080 of the Stockton Municipal Code.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
JOB CLASS FY2025-26 BASE ANNUAL SALARY BY STEP
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
Code and Housing
Enforcement Official $127,121.64 $133,645.22 $140,501.51 $147,691.37 $155,252.12 $163,229.46 Public Safety
Telecommunications
Manager
$127,121.64 $133,645.22 $140,501.51 $147,691.37 $155,252.12 $163,229.46 Property and
Records Manager $115,786.10 $121,727.95 $127,972.87 $134,521.60 $141,409.08 $148,670.74 637
3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED August 12, 2025 .
CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:
KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
638
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-0753, Version: 1
APPROVE MOTION TO ENTER INTO A NEW CONTRACT WITH APPLIED OFFICE FOR
CITYWIDE COMPUTER TRAINING SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to:
1. Award a Professional Services Contract to Applied Office for a term of three (3) years with the option of two (2) one-year renewals for citywide computer training services. The total contract amount is $166,320 for the first three years, with two (2) one-year optional renewals, estimated at $55,440 per year;
2. Approve findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process; and
3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to take necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.
Summary
On February 24, 2025, the City issued a Request For Proposals (RFP) for computer training services under a three-year contract (PUR-25-024). On April 10, 2025, six proposals were received, with Applied Office submitting the most comprehensive and qualified proposal (Attachment A). The citywide computer training program provides instructor-led in-person or virtual group applications and features training for City staff on core business applications.
The recommended motion authorizes the purchase and acquisition of a three-year contract for computer training services from Applied Office (Attachment B), for a total cost of $166,320 and two (2) one-year optional renewals at an estimated cost of $55,440 per year (Attachment C).
DISCUSSION
Background
The Information Technology (IT) Department oversees computer training for all City employees.
Courses are related to core business applications (e.g., Outlook for email, SharePoint, OneDrive, Microsoft Teams, and other Office productivity tools). All courses are instructor-led and can be offered both in-person and virtually.
Over the last few years, the City of Stockton has deployed a suite of modern technology tools to increase office productivity. To ensure effective use of these tools, the IT Department previously City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
639
File #: 25-0753, Version: 1
solicited, evaluated, and selected a qualified training consultant through the Request For Proposals (RFP) process. As a result of the previous RFP process, the current contract with Applied Office was awarded and approved under Motion 2020-08-11-1105 and expires on September 30, 2025. By contracting with a skilled training consultant, we ensure staff are provided with the highest quality materials, opportunities for growth, and faster deployment of technology for better adoption rates and higher productivity.
Applied Office has been a key contributor to the growth of the Citywide Training Program and the expanding course list and curriculum over the last three fiscal years. During FY 2022-23 and FY 2023 -24 (Table 1), Applied Office provided in-person and virtual training on 37 different application courses, hosting 120 sessions in total across all subjects, which reached over 1,050 staff throughout the two-year period.
Table 1: Previous Expenditures:
Expenditure Description FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Projected FY 2024-25
Estimated
Total
Computer Training Services $40,350 $35,812 $42,950 $119,112 The proposed contract includes expanded application courses, reporting and analysis services to be provided, such as class statistics, quarterly reporting, and workforce assessment, for better alignment of future course offerings. By utilizing a three-year contract with two (2) one-year optional renewals, the IT Department can continue to execute a long-term training program that provides continuity, builds on skills assessments, and ensures qualified and knowledgeable instructors for City staff.
Present Situation
On February 24, 2025, the City issued an RFP for computer training services under a three-year contract (PUR-25-024). The purpose was to identify and select a qualified training consultant to assist the City of Stockton in providing in-person and virtual computer training courses for City employees.
A Notice Inviting Proposals for the procurement of citywide computer training services was published in BidFlash (PUR 25-024) on February 24, 2025. The Notice Inviting Proposals was also emailed to one vendor from former engagements.
Six proposals were received on April 10, 2025. The proposals were evaluated for technical experience and employee engagement criteria prior to reviewing and evaluating the proposed fees and total cost.
The proposal (Attachment A) from Applied Office for a three-year contract for citywide computer training services met the published specifications and received the highest ranking. Applied Office was the most qualified based on the criteria for evaluation and the RFP selection process. It is recommended that Council approve a motion authorizing the procurement and contract for services from Applied Office in the total estimated amount of $166,320 for three years with two (2) one-year optional extensions for an estimated $55,440 per year (Attachment C).
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
640
File #: 25-0753, Version: 1
Findings
Stockton Municipal Code Section 3.68.070(A)(3) provides an exception to the competitive bidding process in cases where the City Council has approved findings that support and justify the exception.
The proposed findings are as follows:
1. The City does not have sufficient staff to provide citywide training for core applications. By contracting with a qualified and skilled training consultant, we ensure staff are provided with quality materials, opportunities for growth, and faster deployment of technology for better adoption rates and higher productivity.
2. The RFP process is appropriate for this Professional Services Contract because it relies on evaluating professional qualifications and performance to select a vendor. Based on these criteria, the selected vendor was the most qualified.
3. The City negotiated a contract following solicitation of competitive proposals in accordance with SMC section 3.68.070.A.3.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The total purchase authority requested is $277,200. This includes a three-year contract with Applied Office for $166,320 (Ref. Table 2), plus two optional one-year extensions at $55,440 each, totaling $110,880. Budget is appropriated for Fiscal Year 2025-26 in the Technology Internal Service Fund 510.
Table 2: Three-Year Contract
Expenditure Description FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 Estimated Total Computer Training Services $55,440 $55,440 $55,440 $166,320 Future costs will be included in the annual budget appropriation process. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Attachment A - Applied Office Proposal
Attachment B - Contract with Applied Office
Attachment C - Applied Office Fee Schedule
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
641
ATTACHMENT A
642
Submitted By
David Diskin
Owner, Applied Office
PO Box 1582
Lodi, CA 95241-1582
209-610-0651
appliedoffice.net
[email protected]
Proposal
Onsite Software Training
Response to RFP PUR 25-024
Citywide Training
For the City of Stockton
September 2025 through August 2030
ATTACHMENT A
643
Executive Summary
David Diskin dba Applied Office is pleased to respond to RFP PUR 25-024 (Citywide Training) and continue its eight-year relationship as a vendor for the City of Stockton.
Summary of Experience (CL #3)
David Diskin is a Microsoft Certified Professional and certified “Master” of Microsoft Office with over 25 years of computing experience in training, application development, and consulting.
David currently provides on-site computer training to many businesses and government agencies including:
• The City of Stockton
• University of the Pacific
• Adventist Health (Lodi)
• California Waste Recovery Systems
• The City of Tracy
• California Dept of Justice
• Illumina
• Blue Diamond Growers
David is proud to present the following qualifications and advantages as your trusted IT training and consulting provider:
• Local: David has demonstrated an ability to quickly respond to demand as- needed for in-person classroom delivery and meetings without added charges for travel or being limited to video conferences.
• Consistency: As a trusted vendor with the City of Stockton since 2017, David has delivered over 1,800 hours of classes and consulting to City employees. • Familiarity: David is extremely familiar with the City of Stockton’s Microsoft 365 implementation and has consulted on its use of SharePoint, Teams, and other related services since their rollout. David has also developed a rapport with City staff in every department, most notably IT and HR.
ATTACHMENT A
644
• Convenience: Without any other employees or subcontractors, David provides a single point of contact for all services including training delivery, facilitation, consulting, and billing.
• Experience:
- 25 years of experience using Microsoft Office
- 20 years of experience training on Microsoft Office and Windows - 20 years of experience creating curriculum on a variety of applications - 15 years of experience training on Microsoft SharePoint - 8 years of experience training on WebEx
- 7 years of experience training on Microsoft Teams
- 7 years of experience training on Adobe Acrobat
- 7 years of experience delivering training online
• Certifications:
- Microsoft Office User Specialist at the “Master” Level - Microsoft Certified Professional
- CompTIA A+
• Flexibility: David’s services include a large catalog of available courses that can be delivered in person and online. Classes are customized based on the City’s specific needs, policies, and implementation. There are no contractual minimums or requirements.
Acknowledgement of Addendums (CL #4)
Addendum #1 (on March 28, 2025) is hereby acknowledged.
Addendum #2 (on April 3, 2025) is hereby acknowledged.
Proposal Timeframe (CL #5)
This proposal, and all its contents, including the fee proposal, are valid until July 31, 2025.
ATTACHMENT A
645
Qualifications and Experience
Firm Organization (5.1.1)
David Diskin dba Applied Office is a sole proprietorship based in Lodi, CA, founded in April 2005.
There are no divisions, parent/holding companies, subcontractors, or other personnel.
For David’s resume, please see Appendix A.
Prior experience with government-based contracts includes:
• The City of Stockton (2017)
• California Department of Justice (2009)
• California Office of Emergency Services (2008)
• City of Lathrop (2019)
• City of Tracy (2023)
• San Joaquin County Public Works (2017)
Services to these clients includes training on Microsoft software (including Microsoft 365), consulting and development on Microsoft 365 services (including SharePoint and Power BI), and database development (Access and SQL).
List of References (5.1.2)
Please see Attachment D.
Financial Capacity (5.1.3)
Please see Attachment E.
Further, it is affirmed that David Diskin dba Applied Office is not involved in any ongoing bankruptcy, reorganization, liquidation, or dissolution.
ATTACHMENT A
646
Qualifications (5.1.4)
It is affirmed that David Diskin dba Applied Office meets the following criteria:
✓ Minimum of 10 Years of Experience Training and Delivering on Microsoft Office Applications
✓ Extensive Knowledge of Microsoft 365, Adobe Acrobat, HTML, Power BI, Power Query, Windows, and SharePoint
✓ Certified Microsoft Office Specialist (MOS) “Master” Level Further, David Diskin can (and has been) deliver classes at the City’s training center and via Microsoft Teams.
Further, David Diskin dba Applied Office will comply with all City of Stockton regulations, including:
✓ Execution of the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) ✓ Provide a Certificate of Insurance
✓ Execution of a Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (MNDA) ✓ Hold Appropriate Business Licenses
All services will be billed at a flat, hourly rate.
ATTACHMENT A
647
Method of Approach (5.2)
Scope of Work (5.2.1)
David Diskin dba Applied Office has read and understands the requirements of the Scope of Work.
This proposal is to provide live, instructor-led training for City employees on Microsoft 365, Adobe, and other apps and technologies as requested, online and in person.
Meeting Scope Requirements (5.2.2)
Training Methods
Interactive sessions allow employees to follow along on their workstations, onsite or remotely, while watching the instructor’s display and asking questions as they learn.
Lecture sessions allow employees to “watch and learn” via the instructor’s display, allowing for them to practice on their own time after the lecture has ended.
Locations
Onsite classes will be held at your training facilities in Stockton.
Remote classes will be broadcast via Teams, Zoom, or Webex.
Class Size
This proposal is offered as a flat rate, regardless of the number of participants in any session. However, to ensure attendees have a positive experience, a maximum number of attendees is recommended:
Interactive Lecture
Onsite 18 Max 50 Max
Remote 30 Max 100 Max
ATTACHMENT A
648
Classes may also be limited based on the size of your training facility and network capabilities.
Equipment and Technologies
For all onsite sessions, you will provide a workstation, projector, and screen for the instructor’s use. It is recommended that you provide workstations (or laptops) for each of your participants or enough for them to pair up. All workstations will need to have Microsoft 365 installed, or access to a remote service. It is recommended that internet and network access be made available to the instructor and all participants.
Sample files will be made available for training via email, USB, or network access prior to the class. You will also provide a parking permit.
For all remote sessions, you will provide a license for a delivery service such as Microsoft Teams.
For all sessions, you will provide an Microsoft 365 license at E3/G3 or higher for instructor’s use. (Other classes, such as Power BI Service, may require additional licenses.)
Class Dates, Duration, and Times
Your instructor is available for classes most days starting September 2025. When you are ready, we can compare calendars and select dates for training.
Most classes are full day (six hours). This proposal is priced for a specific number of hours of training, regardless of the number of classes.
Materials
Materials provided include a class description, and may include additional handouts such as an agenda or “cheat sheets” to help attendees recall information they have learned after the class. They will be provided at no charge as PDFs which you may distribute via handouts and/or your intranet to attendees and other employees or printed using your resources.
ATTACHMENT A
649
Attendance Reporting
Starting with this new contract, David will provide reports that summarize class attendance by topic and department, top attendees, top classes, number of learning hours, and other metrics including those gathered from the aforementioned survey.
An hourly rate may apply for initial development.
Class Schedule and Topics
Refer to the Course Listing (sent as an attachment) for available classes. Additional topics can be added upon request. If a requested topic requires the instructor to learn new material, an hourly rate may apply.
Class Cancellation
Classes may be cancelled or rescheduled with 2 business days’ notice, for any reason, and no charge will be incurred. Classes cancelled or rescheduled with less than 2 business days’ notice will be charged for one (1) hour.
Likewise, this quote assumes no minimum and you are not required to schedule all available days/hours/classes to maintain the listed price.
Best Practices (5.2.3)
To ensure the highest quality training experience, Applied Office adheres to pedagogical and information technology best practices that enhance engagement, retention, and application of knowledge. For instance,
• Active Learning: Most training sessions incorporate hands-on exercises, using real-world scenarios, with classroom discussions.
• Customized Content: Courses are tailored to meet the specific needs of the City, often specific to employees' departments and skill, ensuring relevance. • Feedback-Driven: Immediate feedback from attendees and post-class surveys allows for continuous refinement of course content and delivery.
ATTACHMENT A
650
• Follow-Up Resources: Materials such as recorded sessions reinforce learning, reach more employees, and provide self-guided support on demand.
Quality Assurance (5.2.4)
Per our prior agreements, David launched a survey that all attendees are encouraged (and reminded) to complete after each class. The results and raw data of this survey are available to select City employees at any time.
As of March 10, 2025, KPIs from the survey’s 868 results include:
Class Objectives were Clearly Stated Class Objectives were Met or Exceeded Trainer had a Thorough Knowledge of the Subject Trainer Sufficiently Answered Questions Trainer Kept the Class Moving
at a Good Pace
Trainer was Positive, Helpful, and
Encouraged Participation
ATTACHMENT A
651
Consulting Services (Optional)
In addition to instructor-led training classes, this proposal offers additional services to be provided as determined by the City.
Curriculum and Learning
David is available to assist in the authoring and editing of learning assets including, but not limited to:
• quick reference materials and other documentation
• presentations and videos
• SharePoint sites and pages that focus on training
David is also available to consult on training lab design, including room layout, hardware selection, software and technology integration, and lab policies to optimize the learning environment.
One-on-One Assistance and Consulting
To help individuals and departments that need support beyond what the IT Help Desk can provide, David may assist with questions and projects related to Microsoft 365 including, but not limited to:
• spreadsheets, including templates and macros
• building and administering sites, libraries, and pages in SharePoint • assistance maintaining Access databases
All requests under this heading require prior approval from the Technology Training Coordinator.
ATTACHMENT A
652
Resume (Appendix A)
David Diskin is a certified Microsoft Office "Master" and works with small businesses and government agencies daily by helping them become more efficient with Microsoft
Office. He has been using Microsoft Office since 1995,
honing his skills in each application for “real world” use through training, consulting, and development.
David began training others on computer software in 1992 and has developed a reputation for being patient with all users yet technically savvy enough to impress power users. His delivery is high- energy, clear, and packed with relevant examples and useful tips.
Living in Lodi, CA, he spends much of his free time assisting non-profit organizations.
Clients
David’s clients include Blue Diamond Growers,
Delta Health Systems, Adventist Health,
Illumina, EDF Renewables, Grocery Outlet, the
University of the Pacific, Cal-Waste Recovery,
and many government agencies including the
California Department of Justice and the City of
Stockton.
Skilled Areas
Operating Systems: All versions of Microsoft
Windows from 3.1 to Windows 11.
Applications: Microsoft Word, Excel, Outlook,
OneNote, Access, Publisher, Visio, PowerPoint,
Project, Loop, Teams, Power BI, OneDrive,
Power Automate, Forms, SharePoint, and many
more.
Other Skills: Database design and
implementation, public speaking, technical
documentation, graphic and website design,
social networking, video production, and
photography.
Certification
David possesses the following certificates:
• CompTia iNet+ Certification
• Microsoft Office User Specialist: Master
• Microsoft Certified Professional
• The Dale Carnegie Course
Community Support
David is a proud supporter of the following:
• Breakthrough Project of Lodi
• World of Wonders Science Museum
• Museum of Science and Curiosity
• Harvest Home Animal Sanctuary
For 10 years, David also ran Leadership Lodi and
is a graduate of both Leadership Lodi and
Leadership Stockton.
ATTACHMENT A
653
Attachment B – Proponent’s Covenant
ATTACHMENT A
654
Attachment C – Non-Collusion Affidavit
ATTACHMENT A
655
Attachment D - References
ATTACHMENT A
656
Attachment E - Financial Capacity
ATTACHMENT A
657
Attachment F - Price Sheet
Per RFP requirements, this has been provided as a separate attachment.
ATTACHMENT A
658
Attachment G – Subcontractors
ATTACHMENT A
659
Attachment H – Exceptions
ATTACHMENT A
660
Conclusion
Thank you for allowing me to present this proposal. Please keep in mind that many aspects of this proposal can be tailored to your specific needs.
Sincerely,
David Diskin, Applied Office
209-610-0651
[email protected]
ATTACHMENT A
661
1 (Rev. 10.27.22)
CITY OF STOCKTON
STANDARD AGREEMENT
1. This Agreement is entered into between the City of Stockton (“City”) and (“Contractor”) to provide
as set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.
_____________________________________________________________________________
2. The term of this Agreement is as follows, unless amended as described in Exhibit A and Exhibit C section 8:
Commences on: Terminates on:
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. The maximum not to exceed amount to be paid to Contractor for the term of this Agreement, including if authorized, reimbursement of expenses, is: $
4. The complete Agreement consists of all the following Agreement documents which by reference are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
____________________________________________________________________________ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized parties have executed this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR
______________________________________________________________________________________________ Contractor’s Name (if other than an individual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.):
______________________________________________________________________________________________ Authorized Signature Date
______________________________________________________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title of Person Signing
______________________________________________________________________________________________ Address
CITY OF STOCKTON
___________________________________________________________________________ Steve Colangelo, Interim City Manager Date
ATTEST:
____________________________________________________________________________ Katherine Roland, CMC, CPMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Lori M. Asuncion, City Attorney
BY:
Agreement Number:
(a) Exhibit A – Statement of Work
(b) Exhibit B – Insurance
(c) Exhibit C – General Terms & Conditions
(d) Exhibit D –
(e) Exhibit E – Compensation Schedule
(f) Exhibit F – Timeline
June 5, 2025
ATTACHMENT B
662
EXHIBIT A
STATEMENT OF WORK
1. Pro
ject Objectives
1.1. The City’s Information Technology department oversees citywide computer training for all City employees. Courses are related to business applications that the City needs to carry out business ( i.e., Microsoft and Adobe productivity tools, ad-hoc applications, etc.).
1.2. The objectives for this engagement are to
1.2.1. P rovide in- depth training for City staff on applications required to further their knowledge base, and
1.2.2. E xpand City capabilities and assist the IT Department with projects related to Microsoft 365 through consulting, support, and development.
2. Project Scope and Contractor Responsibilities
The contractor will provide, and bill hourly for, the following services:
2.1. Curriculum and Planning: Prior to offering classes, the Contractor will:
2.1.1. C ustomize class topics and curriculum based on the City’s specific needs, and
2.1.2. W ork with City staff to draft and finalize the schedule of training sessions each fiscal year (July 1st through June 30th).
2.2. Delivery: Contractor shall provide live, instructor -led training for City employees on Microsoft Office 365, Adobe, and other applications , concepts, and technologies as requested by the IT Department. The contractor will:
2.2.1. D eliver classes in a format that best suits the content, for example:
a. Interactive sessions allow employees to follow along on their workstations while watching the instructor’s display and asking questions as they learn, and
b. Lecture sessions allow employees to “watch and learn” from the instructor, ideal for some topics (such as Online Security) allowing for them to reflect or practice on their own, after the lecture.
2.2.2. Deliver classes in a location deemed necessary by the IT Department:
a. On-site classes will be held at City of Stockton training facilities in Stockton, and
ATTACHMENT B
663
b. Remote classes will be broadcast via Microsoft Teams.
2.2.3. I nstruct a n average of four ( 4) full days per month ( typically six classroom hours each day), and
2.2.4. Class topics shall include Microsoft 365, Adobe, and other applications, concepts, and technologies as requested by the IT Department.
2.3. Materials: The Contractor’s materials shall include a class description and may include additional handouts such as an agenda or “cheat sheets” to help attendees recall information they have learned after the class. They will be provided at no charge as PDFs that may be distributed via handouts and/or the City’s intranet to attendees and other employees or printed using City resources.
2.4. Assessment: To be continually effective, the Contractor will:
2.4.1. Informally assess employee engagement and understanding of the materials,
2.4.2. D evelop and maintain an online survey for employees to review classes and provide feedback,
2.4.3. Gather statistics on class attendance,
2.4.4. P roduce quarterly and annual reports on a variety of factors including attendance by topic and department, top attendees, top classes, number of learning hours, and other metrics, including those gathered from the aforementioned survey,
2.4.5. A ssess the workforce annually to determine training needs and preferences, and
2.4.6. Propose new and revised courses as they pertain to the expanding list of City applications and employee needs, and adapting to changing infrastructure and technologies
2.5. After-Class Development: To assist employees after classes, Contractor will:
2.5.1. P ublish recorded classes on the IT Training Resources SharePoint Site to be available to all employees, and
2.5.2. R espond to attendee questions, via email, for 30 days after a class.
2.6. One-on-One and Group Assistance: To help individuals and departments that need support beyond what the IT Help Desk can provide, Contractor may assist with questions and projects related to Microsoft 365 including, but not limited to:
2.6.1. S preadsheets, including templates and macros,
2.6.2. B uilding and administering sites, libraries, and pages in SharePoint,
2.6.3. A ssistance through automation using Power Automate,
ATTACHMENT B
664
2.6.4. A ssistance in reporting through Power BI, and
2.6.5. A ssistance maintaining SQL and Access databases.
2.7. Learning Asset Development : Contractor is available to assist in the authoring and editing of learning assets including, but not limited to:
2.7.1. Q uick reference materials and other documentation,
2.7.2. P resentations and videos,
2.7.3. SharePoint sites and pages that focus on training, and
2.7.4. C onsultation on training lab design, including room layout, hardware selection, software and technology integration, and lab policies to optimize the learning environment.
3. City Responsibilities
3.1. Equipment: For all onsite sessions, City will provide a workstation and projector/screen or equivalent display for the Contractor’s use. All attendee workstations shall have Microsoft 365 installed or access to a remote service. I nternet and network access shall be made available to the Contractor and all participants.
3.2. Licensing: City will provide licensing for the Contractor’s use, including:
3.2.1. Microsoft 365 license at E3/G3 or higher,
3.2.2. Access to services required to facilitate the scope of this agreement including SharePoint, Forms, Power Automate, Stream, and Power BI Service, and
3.2.3. Microsoft Teams Phone Conferencing (for remote classes),
3.2.4. Power BI Service (for Power BI classes),
3.2.5. Copilot (for Copilot and related classes), and
3.2.6. Additional licenses, as required for desired classes.
3.3. Marketing: City will market classes to city employees.
3.4. Registration Tracking: City will process registrations, invite attendees to classes, and manage attendee cancellations.
3.5. Room Reservations: City will manage the reservation of labs used for onsite classes.
3.6. Parking: City will provide a parking permit for the duration of this agreement.
4. Limitations and Other Notes
4.1. Class Size : Services are offered as a flat hourly rate, regardless of the number of participants in any session. However, to ensure attendees have a positive experience, a maximum number of attendees is recommended:
ATTACHMENT B
665
Interactive Lecture
Onsite 18 Max 50 Max
Remote 30 Max 100 Max
4.2. Class Cancellation : Classes may be cancelled or rescheduled with 2 business days’ notice, for any reason, and no charge will be incurred.
Classes cancelled or rescheduled with less than two (2) business days’ notice will be charged for one (1) hour.
5. Major Deliverables:
Contractor shall:
5.1. E valuate and propose class topics and updated curriculum each year,
5.2. C reate an annual calendar of training classes with a minimum of four (4) full-day training classes, either in-person or online, per month,
5.3. M aintain a post-class survey to gather attendee feedback, and
5.4. Provide a n on- demand report on training delivered, attendance, and feedback.
6. Notices
6.1. Pursuant to Exhibit C – General Terms and Conditions, Paragraph 15 – Notices, the mailing address for all required notices is as follows:
Contractor: Applied Office City: City of Stockton
Attn: David Diskin Attn: Information Technology
P.O. Box 1582 425 N. El Dorado Street
Lodi, CA 95241 Stockton, CA 95202
7. Key Pe
rsonnel
Applied Office,
David Diskin,
(209) 610-0651
[email protected]
8. Opti
on to Renew
A written amendment executed by both parties may extend the term of the Agreement up to two (2) one- year extensions. However, the total term of the Agreement, including the extended term, shall not exceed five (5) years.
ATTACHMENT B
666
Exhibit B:
Insurance Requirements
(Professional Services)
Cons
ultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
MINIMUM SC
OPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Cov
erage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Com
mercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Aut
omobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non - owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Work
ers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(Not required if consultant provides written verification it has no employees)
4. Pro
fessional Liability /Errors and Omissions i nsurance appropriates to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $1,000,000 aggregate.
If t
he Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Stockton requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Stockton.
Other
Insurance Provisions
The
insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
ATTACHMENT B
667
Additional Insured Status
The City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). Additional insured Name of Organization shall read “City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.” Policy shall cover City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for all locations work is done under this contract.
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non -contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Stockton , its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. The City of Stockton does not accept endorsements limiting the Contractor’s insurance coverage to the sole negligence of the Named Insured.
Umbrella or Excess Policy
The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non- contributory, additional insured, Self- Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Contractor’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City of Stockton.
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City of Stockton a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Stockton by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies
ATTACHMENT B
668
regardless of whether or not the City of Stockton has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
Self -Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Stockton. The City of Stockton may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Stockton. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City of Stockton. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City of Stockton may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Contractor to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City of Stockton reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Stockton.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work .
3. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims - made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City of Stockton with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by
ATTACHMENT B
669
this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements . All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City of Stockton before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City of Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City of Stockton is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.
Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work , shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided
for at least five (5) years
after completion of the contract of work .
Special Risks or Circumstances
City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Certificate Holder Address
The address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be:
City of Stockton
Its Officers, Officials, Employees, and Volunteers
400 E Main Street, 3
rd Floor – HR
Stockton, CA 95202
ATTACHMENT B
670
EXHIBIT C
GENERAL T
ERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Goods, Equipment and Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A of the Agreement. Contractor shall provide said services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A of the Agreement.
2. City Assistance, Facilities, Equipment and Clerical Support. Except as set forth in Exhibit A, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish and maintain all facilities and equipment that may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. If applicable, City shall furnish to Contractor only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit A to the Agreement.
3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to the Agreement.
3.1 Invoi
ces submitted by Contractor to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time spent and City reference number. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s invoice, City will review invoice, and if acceptable make payment on approved invoice.
3.2 Upon com
pletion of work and acceptance by City, Contractor shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitation. The City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed which the Contractor fails or neglects to submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after the work is accepted by the City.
4. Sufficiency of Contractor ’s Work . All Contractor services, work, and deliverables shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner with due diligence in accordance with the degree of skill normally exercised by similar contractors supplying services and work of a similar nature, and in conformance with applicable laws, codes and professional standards. Contractor ’s work sh all be adequate and sufficient to meet the purposes of this Agreement.
5. Ownership of Work . All reports, work product, all other documents completed or partially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of this Agreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall become the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree 1 ATTACHMENT B
671
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final deliver y to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense.
Contractor and its approved subcontractors shall keep materials confidential. Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Agreement and shall not be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services, unless the City provides prior written consent.
6. Timeliness. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Further, Contractor acknowledges that the failure of Contrac tor to comply with the time limit s described in Exhibit A and Exhibit F may result in economic or other losses to the City.
7. Changes. Both parties to this Agreement understand that it may become desirable or necessary during the term of this Agreement for City to modify the scope of services provided for under this Agreement. Any material extension or change in the scope of work shall be discussed with City and the change and cost shall be memorialized in a written amendment to the original contract prior to the performance of the additional work. Until the amendment is so executed, City will not be responsible to pay any charges Contractor may incur in performing such additional services, and Contractor shall not be required to perform any such additional services.
8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless an amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.
9. Contractor’s Status.
9. 1 In performing the obligations set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall have the status of an independent contractor and Contractor shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Contractor are its agents and employees and are not agents or employees of City. Contractor by virtue of this Agreement, has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of City. Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City. No agent, officer or employee of the City is to be considered an employee of the Contractor. It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture.
9.2 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's 2 ATTACHMENT B
672
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. Con tractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.
9.3 If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision and control of Contractor. All terms of employment including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring and discharging or any other term of employment or requirements of law shall be determined by the Contractor.
9.4 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W -2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor's assigned personnel under the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
10. Subcontractor.
10.1 Subcontractors shall not be recognized as having any direct or contractual relationship with City. Contractor shall be responsible for the work of subcontractors, which shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Subcontractors will be provided with a copy of the Agreement and be bound by its terms. Contractor is responsible to City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and persons directly or indirectly employed by them.
10.2 If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, super vision and control of Contractor. All terms of employment including hours, wages working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging or any other term of employment or requirement of law shall be determined by Contractor.
10.3 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W -2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor’s personnel.
11. Termination.
11.1 Termination for Convenience of City. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Contractor. The Agreement shall then be deemed terminated, and no further work shall be performed by Contractor. If the Agreement is so terminated, the Contractor shall be paid for the work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received. 3 ATTACHMENT B
673
11. 2 Should either party default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, the other party, at that party ’s option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to the other party.
11.3 Funding- Non-Appropriation. It is mutually understood between the Parties that payment to the Contractor for performance shall be dependent upon the availability of appropriations by the City Council for the purposes of this Agreement. No legal liability on the part of the City for any payment may arise under this Agreement until funds are made available and until the Contractor has received funding availability, which will be confirmed in writing. If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted, or if the City loses funding for any reason, the City, in its sole discretion, shall have the option to either (a) cause this Agreement to be canceled or terminated pursuant to applicable provisions of the Agreement; or (b) offer to amend the Agreement to reflect the reduced funding for this Agreement.
12. Non-Assignability. The Contractor s hall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any interest or obligation in the Agreement without the prior written consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City m ay set forth in writing. Contractor shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors.
13. Indemnity and Hold
Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law,
Contractor shall hold harmless, defend
and indemnify City of Stockton and
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, cos
ts (including without limitation costs and
fees of litigation) of every
nature arising out of or in connection with
Contractor’s performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in
this agreement, except such loss or damage
which was caused by the
sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City
of Stockton. This obligation is independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum insurance
obligations contained in this agreement.
These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this agreement.
14. Insurance. During
the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain in full force and effect at its own cost and expense the insurance coverage as set forth in the attached Exhibit B to this A
greement and shall otherwise comply with the
other provisions of
Exhibit B to this Agreement.
15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addr
essed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.
16. Conformance to Applicable Laws
. Contractor shall comply with all
applicable Federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Contractor shall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of services under this Agreement
on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person. 4 ATTACHMENT B
674
17. Licenses, Certifications and Permits . Prior to the City ’s execution of this Agreement and prior to the Contractor’s engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall obtain a City of Stockton business license, which must be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor covenants that it has obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Agreement. Such licenses, certificates and permits shall be maintained in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement.
18. Records and Audits . Contractor shall maintain all records regarding this Agreement and the services performed for a period of three (3) years from the date that final payment is made. At any time during normal business hours, the records shall be made available to the City to inspect and audit. To the extent Contractor renders services on a time and materials basis, Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate accounting records, in a form prescribed by City or, if not prescribed by City, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, such records to include, but not be limited to, payroll records, attendance cards, time sheets, and job summaries.
19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.
20. Conflicts of Interest . Contractor covenants that other than this Agr eement, Contractor has no financial interest with any official, employee or other representative of the City. Contractor and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any m anner of degree by the performance of Contractor ’s services under this Ag reement. If such an interest arises, Contractor shall immediately notify the City.
21. Waiver . In the event either City or Contractor at any time waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition or obligation. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial acceptance by City shall operate as a waiver on the part of City of any of its rights under this Agreement.
22. Governing Law . California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue for all claims in the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin, Stockton Branch or, where applicable, in the Federal District Court of California, Eastern District, Sacramento Division.
23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the Cit y or for any amount due Contractor.
5 ATTACHMENT B
675
24. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement or application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction or if it is found in contravention of any federal, state or city statue, ordinance or regulation the remaining provisions of this Agreement or the application thereof shall not be invalidated thereby and shall remain in full force and effect to the extent that the provisions of this Agreement are severable.
25. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor and its officers, employees, agents, representatives or subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state, or local law, rule or regulation against any employee, applicant for employment or person receiving services under this Agreement because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition (including genetic characteristics), marital status, age, political affiliation, gender identity, gender expression, sex or sexual orientation, family and medical care leave, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. Contractor and its officers, employees, agents, representative or subcontractors shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations related to non- discrimination and equal opportunity, including without limitation the City ’s nondiscrimination policy; the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code sections 12990 (et seq.); California Labor Code sections 1101, 1102 and 1102.1; the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), as amended; and all applicable regulations promulgated in the California Code of Regulation or Code of Federal Regulations. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that “no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial
assistance.” (42 USC Section 2000d).
http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titlevi.htm. The City requires compliance with the requirements of Title VI in all of its programs and activities regardless of funding source.
26. Force Majeure. Neithe r party shall be responsible for delays or failures in performance resulting from acts of God, acts of civil or military authority, terrorism, fire, flood, strikes, war, epidemics, pandemics, shortage of power or other acts or causes reasonably beyond the control of that party. The party experiencing the force majeure event agrees to give the other party notice promptly following the occurrence of a for ce majeure event, and to use diligent efforts to re- commence performance as promptly as commercially practicable.
27. Taxes and Charges. Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.
28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement will not be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may be legally entitled.
6 ATTACHMENT B
676
29. Advice of Attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorn eys or the opportunity to seek such advice.
30. Heading Not Controlling. Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.
31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.
31.1 This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between Contractor and the City; supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral between the parties and may be amended only by a written Amendment signed by the Contractor and City Manager.
31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.
32. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement.
33. Authority. The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.
7 ATTACHMENT B
677
EXHIBIT D
GOODS AND SERVICES TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Def
initions. The following words and phrases have the following meanings for purposes of this Agreement:
1.1 "S
ervices" means, collectively, the services, duties and responsibilities described in Exhibit A of this Agreement and any and all work necessary to complete them or carry them out fully and to the standard of performance required in this Agreement.
1.2 “De
liverable” means quantifiable goods or services that will be provided upon completion of a project. A deliverable is any tangible material, work or thing delivered by one party to the other, including associated technical documentation. A deliverable can be tangible or intangible parts of the development process, and often are specified functions or characteristics of the project.
2. Gener
al. The following terms and conditions are applicable for the purchase of goods and services only. The special conditions shall be read in conjunction with the Standard Agreement, General Terms and Conditions (“GTC”) Exhibit C, and all other Exhibits identified in the Standard Agreement.
2.1 Wher
e any portion of the GTC is in conflict to or at variance with any provisions of the Special Conditions of the Agreement, then unless a different intention stated, the provision(s) of the Special Conditions of the Agreement shall be deemed to override the provision(s) of GTC only to the extent that such conflict or variations in the Special Conditions of the Agreement are not possible of being reconciled with the provisions of the GTC.
2.2 In t
he case of modification of a part or provision of the GTC , the unaltered part or provision, or both shall remain in effect. The Special Conditions shall relate to a particular project and be peculiar to that project but shall not weaken the character or intent of the GTC.
3. Tim
e for Performance.
3.1 Contractor shall perform the services according to the schedule contained in Exhibit F.
3.2 Timeliness of Performance i) Contractor shall provide the S ervices, and Deliverables within the term and within the time limits required under this Agreement, pursuant to the provisions of Exhibit A and Exhibit F. ii) Neither Contractor nor Contractor’s agents, employees nor subcontractors are entitled to any damages from the City, nor is any party entitled to be reimbursed by the City, for damages, charges or other
ATTACHMENT B
678
losses or expenses incurred by Contractor by reason of delays or hindrances in the performance of the Services, whether or not caused by the City.
4. Sta
ndard of Performance
In addi
tion to Exhibit C, Section 4 and 17, Contractor agrees as follows:
4.1 Cont
ractor’s S ervices shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by member s of Contractor’s profession currently practicing under similar conditions. Contractor shall comply with the profession’s standard of performance, applicable laws, regulations, and industry standards . By delivery of completed work, Contractor certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state, and local laws. If Contractor is retained to perform services requiring a license, certification, registration or other similar requirement under California law, Contractor shall maintain that license, certification, registration, or other similar requirement throughout the term of this Agreement.
4.2 Cont
ractor acknowledges that it is entrusted with or has access to valuable and confidential information and records of the City and with respect to that information, Contractor agrees to be held to the standard of care of a fiduciary. Contractor shall assure that all services that require the exercise of professional skills or judgment are accomplished by professionals qualified and competent in the applicable discipline and appropriately licensed, if required by law. Contractor must provide copies of any such licenses. Contractor remains responsible for the professional and technical accuracy of all Services or Deliverables furnished, whether by Contractor or its s ubcontractors or others on its behalf. All Deliverables must be prepared in a form and content satisfactory to the Using Agency and delivered in a timely manner consistent with the requirements of this Agreement.
4.3 If C
ontractor fails to comply with the foregoing standards, Contractor must perform again, at its own expense, all Services required to be re-performed as a direct or indirect result of that failure. Any review, approval, acceptance, or payment for any of the Services by the City does not relieve Contractor of its responsibility for the professional skill and care and technical accuracy of its Services and Deliverables. This provision in no way limits the City’s rights against Contractor either under this Agreement, at law or in equity.
5. Compe
nsation
5.1 In ad
dition to Section 3 Compensation in Exhibit C – G TC, the Contractor shall be compensated for the services provided under this Agreement as follows:
5.1.1 Cont
ractor shall be compensated for services rendered and
accepted under this Agreement and shall be paid monthly, in arrears on a not to exceed
ATTACHMENT B
679
basis, based upon the rates set forth in Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. Contractor may vary the compensation for each task in Exhibit E provided that the total project compensation listed in Exhibit E and the Standard Agreement is not exceeded.
6. Re
ports and Information
Contractor shall at such times and in such forms as the City may require furnish the City such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Agreement , the costs and obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters are covered by this Agreement as specified in Exhibit A and Exhibit E.
7. Findings Confidential
All the reports, information, data, et cetera, prepared or assembled by the Contractor under this Agreement are confidential and the Contractor agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City . Contractor shall not be required under the provisions of this paragraph to keep confidential any data or information which is or becomes publicly available, is required by applicable law or by proper legal or governmental authority, is already rightfully in the Contractor’s possession without obligation of confidentiality, is independently developed by Contractor outside the scope of this Agreement or is rightfully obtained from third parties. Contractor shall give City prompt notice of any such legal or governmental demand and reasonably cooperate with City in any effort to seek a protective order or otherwise to contest such required disclosure.
8. Right of Inspection
All Del iverables furnished by Contractor must be as specified in Exhibit A and will be subject to inspection and approval of City after delivery. City reserves the right to reject and return, at the risk and expense of Contractor , the portion of any Deliverable which may be defective or fail to comply with specifications in Exhibit A without invalidating the remainder of the Deliverables. If rejected, Deliverable will be held for disposition at the expense and risk of Contractor. Payment for Deliverable prior to inspection shall not constitute acceptance of the Deliverable.
9. Warranty
Contractor warrants that (i) any Deliverable created or performed by Contractor for City under this Agreement will conform to specifications, drawings or samples furnished by City to Contractor for a minimum period of one year, and (ii) any standard Deliverable sold by Contractor to other customers besides City will meet or exceed any of the standards for such types of product in industry, any express or implied warranty stated or
ATTACHMENT B
680
advertised by Contractor or the actual manufacturer of such Deliverable, or any warranties implied by law. Contractor’s warranty shall survive delivery of Deliverable and shall not be deemed waived by City’s failure to discover defects, acceptance of the Deliverable, or payment, therefore.
10. Ownership
Contr
actor shall have title to and bear the risk of any loss or damage to the Deliverable until the Deliverable is delivered and accepted by City in conformity with this Agreement. Upon delivery and acceptance, Deliverable delivered by Contractor shall become the exclusive property of City. The ownership rights described herein shall include, but not be limited to, the right to copy, publish, display, transfer, or otherwise use the Deliverable. All artwork, patterns, dies, models, samples, materials, drawings, specifications, technical material, advertising material and any other personal property furnished by City to Contractor , or specifically paid for by City for use in performance of the Agreement, shall be and remain the property of City and said property shall be used only for Deliverables benefiting City. Contractor shall return to City or shall dispose of this property only according to City’s instruction.
11. Applicable Laws
Under guidelines specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200 (f) and (g) City requests that Contractor label applicable Deliverables accordingly and provide associated Safety Data Sheets (“SDS”) to City.
Deliverables must conform with all applicable federal, state, and local laws . Such conformity includes compliance with federal sanctions, and Contractor certifies that it has not and will not engage in prohibited transactions with sanctioned persons or entities.
12. Prevailing Wage
It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to comply, when applicable, with the prevailing wage rates in accordance with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations. It shall further be the responsibility of the Contractor to monitor the prevailing wage rates as established by the California Department of Industrial Relations for any increase in rates during the term of this Agreement and adjust wage rates accordingly.
CONTRA
CTOR REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS - Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.1(a): A Contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. It is not a violation of this section for an unregistered Contractor to submit a bid that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the Contractor is
ATTACHMENT B
681
registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 at the time the contract is awarded.
No cont
ractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].
No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Department of Industrial Relations- Contractor Registration information and web link: https://www.dir.ca.gov/public-works/publicworks.html. In compliance with Senate Bill 854 and the California Labor Code, all Bidders shall include with their Bid proof of registration from the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) that includes the contractor’s Legal Name, Registration Number, License Type/Number, Registration Date and Expiration Date, for every contractor and subcontractor, regardless of tier.
This
project may be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractors must submit their certified payroll records directly to the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement Compliance Monitoring Unit, as well as the City of Stockton.
13. Shipping Terms
Cit
y shipment terms are F.O.B. Destination, Freight Prepaid and Added unless otherwise specified in the Agreement. Contractor shall observe shipping instructions and, unless otherwise stated in the instructions, shall ship Deliverables in the safest and most economical manner necessary to meet the delivery date specified in the Agreement .
Contractor shall provide an itemized packing list showing the Agreement number with the shipment. Contractor shall include the Agreement number on all packages, boxes, invoices, and shipping documents. Contractor shall label all individual boxes with stock number and quantity and items with different stock numbers shall be boxed separately.
City reserves the right to refuse, at Contractor ’s expense, any shipments not containing the Agreement number or stock numbers as required under this section.
14. Deli
veries
TIM
E IS OF THE ESSENCE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY ORDER. If Deliverable is not provided or performed within the times specified in the Agreement, City may cancel the Agreement and hold Contractor liable for damages incurred due to the untimely delivery including, but not limited to, the additional costs resultant from City procuring substitute Deliverables elsewhere.
15. Pric
e and Quantities
ATTACHMENT B
682
Pri
ces and quantities set forth in this Agreement may not be altered by Contractor without the prior written authorization of City, with the exception that quantities of custom paper or printed Deliverables, chemicals, or fuel may deviate from those in the Agreement by the lesser of standard industry practices.
ATTACHMENT B
683
EXHIBIT E
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
The C
ontractor shall be compensated for the services identified in Exhibit A , Exhibit C, and Exhibit D to this Agreement as follows:
1. Proj
ect Price
1.1 The m
aximum the Contractor shall be paid on this Agreement is $166,320 (hereafter the “not to exceed” amount). The “not to exceed” amount includes all payments to be made pursuant to this Agreement, including City approved reimbursable expenses, if any. Nothing in this Agreement requires the City to pay for work that does not meet the Standard of Performance identified in Exhibit D section 4 or other requirements of this Agreement.
1.2 St
andard Reimbursable Items: Only the reimbursable items identified in Exhibit A , C, and D ( Compensation), shall be compensated to the Contractor .
Reimbursable expenses will be reimbursed without markup. Fees plus reimbursable expenses shall not exceed the amount set forth in section 1.1 of this Exhibit and a copy of the original invoice for the items listed in i, ii or iii below shall be attached to the invoice submitted to the City for reimbursement. Payments shall be based upon work documents submitted by the Contractor to the City and accepted by the City as being satisfactory to City’s needs. The City shall not pay a markup on any of the items listed in i, ii or iii .
Additionally, items such a telephone, fax, postage or freight are already included in the billable hourly rate. Contractor shall be reimbursed the direct expenses, which are the actual cost of the following items that are reasonable, necessary and actually incurred, by the Contractor in connection with the services:
i. Expens
es, fees or charges for printing, reproduction or binding of documents at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost. ii. Any f
iling fees, permit fees, or other fees paid or advanced by the Contractor at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost. iii. Trav
el expenses shall be reimbursed in accordance with the C ity’s travel policy, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Reimbursement shall be made at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost.
1.3 The
Contractor shall be entitled to receive payments for its work performed pursuant to the Agreement. The City will pay Contractor based on invoices for acceptable work performed and approved until the “not to exceed” amount is reached. Thereafter, Contractor must complete services based on the Agreement without additional compensation unless there is a material change to the Statement of Work and Scope by a written Amendment.
ATTACHMENT B
684
1.4 If work is completed before the “not to exceed” amount is reached, the Contractor’s compensation will be based on the Contractor ’s invoices previously submitted for acceptable work performed and approved.
1.5 Subc
ontractor Costs: Subcontractors are not permitted in this Agreement.
2. Hour
ly Rates. The flat fee hourly rate to be billed to the City regardless of Role Contractor performs or additional services Contractor performs in this Agreement is $165.00 per hour. Contractor shall be compensated based on the hourly rates set forth below, on a time and material basis for those services that are within the general scope of services of this Agreement, but beyond the description of services required under Exhibit A, and all services are reasonably necessary to complete the standards of performance required by this Agreement. Any changes and related fees shall be mutually agreed upon between the parties by a written amendment to this Agreement.
3. Class Fee Schedule. The below is a flat rate fee schedule and is not contingent on the number of participants in any session. The fee schedule includes a specific number of hours of training regardless of the number of classes.
Hourly Billable Rate Schedule
Month Role on
Project
Hourly
Billable
Rate
# Class
per Month
# Hours (Average
6 hours per class)
Total
Billable
monthly
Jul-25 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Aug-25 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Sep-25 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Oct-25 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Nov-25 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Dec-25 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Jan-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Feb-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Mar-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Apr-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
May-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Jun-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
FY2025-2026 TOTAL 54 336 $55,440.00
Month Role on
Project
Hourly
Billable
Rate
# Class
per Month
# Hours (Average
6 hours per class)
Total
Billable
monthly
Jul-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Aug-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
ATTACHMENT B
685
Sep-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Oct-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Nov-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Dec-26 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Jan-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Feb-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Mar-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Apr-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
May-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Jun-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
FY2026-2027 TOTAL 54 336 $55,440.00
Month Role on
Project
Hourly
Billable
Rate
# Class
per Month
# Hours (Average
6 hours per class)
Total
Billable
monthly
Jul-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Aug-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Sep-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Oct-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Nov-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Dec-27 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Jan-28 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Feb-28 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Mar-28 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Apr-28 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
May-28 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
Jun-28 Instructor $165.00 4.5 28 $4,620.00
FY2027-2028 TOTAL 54 336 $55,440.00
3 Year Grand Total 162 1008 $166,320.00
5. In
voice to Address. Each invoice submitted shall identify the specific task(s) listed in Exhibit A and this Exhibit, and the completed work product/deliverable for the agreed - upon price listed in this Exhibit. Invoices shall be submitted to the email address:
ATTACHMENT B
686
EXHIBIT F
TIME
LINE
1. Contra
ctor shall complete the requested services identified in Exhibit A as follows:
1.1 TIMELINE FOR COMPLETION OF WORK
1.1.1 Fiscal Year 2025-26
Months # of Classes # of Hours
Jul-25 4.5 28
Aug-25 4.5 28
Sep-25 4.5 28
Oct-25 4.5 28
Nov-25 4.5 28
Dec-25 4.5 28
Jan-26 4.5 28
Feb-26 4.5 28
Mar-26 4.5 28
Apr-26 4.5 28
May-26 4.5 28
Jun-26 4.5 28
FY 2025-26 TOTAL 54 336
1.1.2 Fiscal Year 2026-27
Months # of Classes # of Hours
Jul-26 4.5 28
Aug-26 4.5 28
Sep-26 4.5 28
Oct-26 4.5 28
Nov-26 4.5 28
Dec-26 4.5 28
Jan-27 4.5 28
Feb-27 4.5 28
Mar-27 4.5 28
Apr-27 4.5 28
May-27 4.5 28
Jun-27 4.5 28
FY 2026-27 TOTAL 54 336
ATTACHMENT B
687
1.1.3 Fiscal Year 2027-28
Months # of Classes # of Hours
Jul-27 4.5 28
Aug-27 4.5 28
Sep-27 4.5 28
Oct-27 4.5 28
Nov-27 4.5 28
Dec-27 4.5 28
Jan-28 4.5 28
Feb-28 4.5 28
Mar-28 4.5 28
Apr-28 4.5 28
May-28 4.5 28
Jun-28 4.5 28
FY 2027-28 TOTAL 54 336
3-Year Grand Total 162 1008
ATTACHMENT B
688
8-8
ATTACHMENT F – COST/PRICE PROPOSAL
PUR 25-024
Proposal Submitted By:
Company Name:
Contact Name:
Contact Email:
Contact Phone:
Signature: Title: Date:
Project Overview:
Description of Services:
Project Start Date: ______________
Project End Date: ______________
Consulting Fees: Hourly Rate: $
(No. of Hours: _____)
Estimated Total: $
Materials and Resources:
Description:
Cost Breakdown:
Estimated Cost: $
Travel Expenses: Mileage: $__________ (Miles: _________) Accommodations: $
Per Diem: $
Other Expenses:
Description: Estimated Cost: $
Total Estimated Cost: $
David Diskin dba Applied Office
David Diskin
[email protected]
209-610-0651
Owner March 11, 2025
IT Training
Online and Onsite Training Services for Microsoft, Adobe, and More Sept 1, 2025
Aug 30, 2028
165
1,008
166,320
None
None
None
None
None
166,320
ATTACHMENT C
689
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-0748, Version: 1
ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION TO THE 2024 WASTEWATER RATE STUDY RESOLUTION EXHIBIT 2 AND AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2025- 26 FEE SCHEDULE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:
1. Approve the administrative correction to Exhibit 2 to Resolution No. 2024-11-12-1605 (Attachment A).
2. Amend page I-8 of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Fee Schedule for Multi-family rate class (Attachment B).
It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.
Summary
The Municipal Utilities Department (MUD) is comprised of three enterprise funds including Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Utilities. The Wastewater Utility includes a sanitary sewer collection system of approximately 900 miles of gravity sewer main, 554 miles of lower lateral pipe, 27 pump stations, and 30 miles of pressurized force main that route sewage to the Regional Wastewater Control Facility (RWCF) for treatment. The system collects sewage from properties within the City, special districts outside the City, and certain areas within San Joaquin County. The RWCF is an advanced tertiary treatment facility with a 55 million-gallon per day (MGD) capacity and is located adjacent to the San Joaquin River.
Following the completion of the 2024 Wastewater Rate Study and public hearing held on November 12, 2024, the City Council adopted, by Resolution No. 2024-11-12-1605 (Resolution), the 2024 Wastewater Rate Study, the maximum wastewater services charges, and the effective dates. After the adoption of the new rates and their effective dates, an administrative error was discovered in the sewer rates associated with Multi-family Residential units listed in Exhibit 2 of the Resolution. This error resulted in monthly rate undercharges of $0.19 and $0.18 for Multi-family Residential units within the City and outside of the City, respectively.
If approved by the City Council, this action will adopt a resolution approving an administrative correction to the Wastewater Monthly Rates associated with Multi-family Residential Units and page I -8 of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Fee Schedule.
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
690
File #: 25-0748, Version: 1
DISCUSSION
Background
It is a best practice to review customer rates for sewer utility service every five years to confirm whether rates will adequately cover sanitary sewer service costs over the following five years, and that the utility maintains adequate financial resources to provide this essential public health service to the community.
In accordance with California Constitution article XIII D, Section 6 (commonly referred to as Proposition 218), MUD staff completed the 2024 Wastewater Rate Study review work and mailed Notices of Public Hearing on September 20, 2024, to 81,847 affected record owners or affected sewer utility customers directly responsible for the payment of sewer service charges.
On November 12, 2024, the City Council held a public hearing to consider testimony and written protests on the adoption of proposed rate adjustments to the City of Stockton wastewater or sewer rates. At the close of the public hearing, the City did not receive written protests from a majority of the affected property owners or affected sewer utility customers directly liable for the payment of the sewer service charges. By Resolution No. 2024-11-12-1605, the City Council adopted the 2024 Wastewater Rate Study that met the requirements of Proposition 218 and the maximum sewer service charges and effective dates.
Present Situation
Prior to implementing the approved rate adjustments each fiscal year, MUD staff review the revenue requirements and the rates necessary to meet those revenue requirements during the Annual Budget process. After notices of rate adjustment were mailed to customers on May 27, 2025, it was discovered that the rates listed in Exhibit 2 to Resolution No. 2024-11-12-1605 (Attachment A) for Multi-family Residential units contained two errors which created undercharges in these rates.
The rates for Multi-family Residential units within the City and outside of the City in Exhibit 2 to Resolution No. 2024-11-12-1605 effective July 1, 2025, were listed at $54.78 and $49.14 per month.
However, the correct rates as shown in the 2024 Wastewater Rate Study were $54.97 and $49.32 per month. This discrepancy resulted in a $0.19 cent and $0.18 cent revenue decrease per Multi- family Residential unit within the City and outside of the City respectively, which totaled a $3,220.74 loss in revenue (see table).
Customer
Classification
Customers Adopted Rate
Effective July
1, 2025
Correct Rate 2-Month Billing
Impact
Multi-Family (City) 7,623 $54.78 $54.97 $(2,896.74)
Multi-Family (Non-City) 900 $49.14 $49.32 $(324.00)
$(3,220.74)
Staff recommend the City Council approve the corrected Wastewater Monthly Rates associated with all Multi-family Residential Units and page I-8 of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Fee Schedule.
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
691
File #: 25-0748, Version: 1
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Revenues received from multi-family customers are deposited into the Wastewater account 6511-000 -442002-610-000-00-65-000-000.
There is no impact to the General Fund, or any other unrestricted funds, from this action.
Attachment A - Exhibit 2 to Resolution No. 2024-11-12-1605 Attachment B - Page I-8 of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Fee Schedule City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
692
ATTACHMENT A
693
Description Reason Current Amount Proposed Amount
Single-Family & Condo Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$52.30 $54.39
Multi-Family Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$47.25 $49.14
Apartments Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$41.75 $43.42
Single-Family Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$57.36 $59.65
Multi-Family Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$52.67 $54.78
Apartments Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$47.57 $49.47
Low Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$26.91 $27.99
Low Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$2.40 / hcf $2.50 / hcf
Medium Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$26.91 $27.99
Medium Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$2.75 / hcf $2.86 / hcf
High Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$26.91 $27.99
High Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$4.42/ hcf $4.60/ hcf
Schools - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$26.91 $27.99
Schools - Other Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$1.29 / ADA $1.34 / ADA
Low Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$23.63 $24.58
Low Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$2.40 / hcf $2.50 / hcf
Medium Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$23.63 $24.58
Medium Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$2.75 /hcf $2.86 /hcf
High Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$23.63 $24.58
High Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$4.54 / hcf $4.60 / hcf
Schools - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$23.63 $24.58
Schools - Other Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$1.29/ ADA $1.34 / ADA
Commercial/Institutional - Contract Users, City Billed, County Maintained FY 2025-26 Proposed Rate Changes on Existing Fees
Municipal Utilities Department
Wastewater
Residential - Contract Users; County District Billing
Residential - City; Contract User, City Billed & Maintained Commercial/Institutional - City; Contract User, City Billed & Maintained City of Stockton I - 8 FY 2025-26 Proposed Fee Schedule $54.78
ATTACHMENT B
694
Resolution No.
STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION TO THE 2024 WASTEWATER RATE STUDY EXHIBIT 2 TO RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -11-12-1605 AND AMENDING PAGE I-8 OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 FEE SCHEDULE
Following the 2024 Wastewater Rate Study and the public hearing held on November 12, 2024, the City Council by Resolution No. 2024 -11-12-1605, adopted the 2024 Wastewater Rate Study and the maximum wastewater service charges and effective dates; and
After notices of rate adjustment were mailed to customers on May 27, 2025, it was discovered that the rates listed in Exhibit 2 to Resolution No. 2024 -11-12-1605 for Multi-family Residential units contained two errors which created undercharges in these rates; and
The rates for Multi -family Residential units within the City and outside of the City in Exhibit 2 to Resolution No. 2024-11-12-1605 effective July 1, 2025, were listed at $54.78 and $49.14 per month; and
The correct rates as shown in the 2024 Wastewater Rate Study were $54.97 and $49.32 per month and resulted in a $0.19 and $0.18 revenue decrease per Multi -family Residential unit within the City and outside of the City respectively, totaling a $3,220.74 loss in revenue; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council approves the administrative correction to Exhibit 2 of Resolution No. 2024-11-12-1605 (Exhibit 1).
2. The City Council amends page I-8 of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Fee Schedule for multi-family rate class effective immediately (Exhibit 2).
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
695
3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED August 12, 2025 .
CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:
KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
696
WASTEWATER MAXIMUM MONTHLY RATES AND EFFECTIVE DATES
Residential
Present
Rates
January 1,
2025
July 1,
2025
July 1,
2026
July 1,
2027
July 1,
2028
Residential Charge
(Per Dwelling Unit)
Single-Family & Condo (City) $55.68 $57.36 $59.65 $62.04 $64.52 $67.10 Single-Family & Condo (Non-
Cit
y)
$50.77 $52.30 $54.39 $56.57 $58.83 $61.18
Multi-Family (City) $52.45 $52.67 $54.97 $56.97 $59.25 $61.62 Multi-Family (Non-City) $47.05 $47.25 $49.32 $51.11 $53.15 $55.28 Apartments (City) $47.57 $47.57 $49.47 $51.45 $53.51 $55.65 Apartments (Non-City) $41.75 $41.75 $43.42 $45.16 $46.97 $48.85 Commercial/Institutional
Present
Rates
January 1,
2025
July 1,
2025
July 1,
2026
July 1,
2027
July 1,
2028
Consumption Charges
($/CCF1)
Com/Inst – Low-strength $2.22 $2.40 $2.50 $2.60 $2.70 $2.81 Com/Inst – Med-strength $2.70 $2.75 $2.86 $2.97 $3.09 $3.21 Com/Inst – High-strength $4.54 $4.42 $4.60 $4.78 $4.97 $5.17 Schools ($/ADA2) $1.30 $1.29 $1.34 $1.39 $1.45 $1.51
Fixed Monthly Charge (City) $26.83 $26.91 $27.99 $29.11 $30.27 $31.48 Fixed Monthly Charge (Non-
Cit
y)
$23.56 $23.63 $24.58 $25. 56 $26.58 $27.64
1CCF = one hundred cubic feet 2ADA = average daily attendance Industrial
Present
Rates
January 1,
2025
July 1,
2025
July 1,
2026
July 1,
2027
July 1,
2028
Industrial Charge s
Fixed Monthly Charge $26.83 $26.91 $27.99 $29.11 $30.27 $31.48 Admin / Stand-by Charge
Industrial – Flow ($/MG1)
$864.80 $945.76 $983.59 $1,022.9
3 $1,063.8
5 $1,106.4
0 Industrial – BOD ($/Klbs2) $140.13 $153.25 $159.38 $165.76 $172.39 $179.29 Industrial – SS ($/Klbs) $102.88 $112.51 $117.01 $121.69 $126.56 $131.62 Consumption Charge s
Industrial – Flow ($/MG) $748.52 $818.59 $851.33 $885.38 $920.80 $957.63 Industrial – BOD ($/Klbs) $52.14 $57.02 $59.30 $61.67 $64.14 $66.71 Industrial – SS ($/Klbs) $83.45 $91.26 $94.91 $98.71 $102.66 $106.77 1MG = million gallons 2Klbs = one thousand pounds
EXHIBIT 1
697
Description Reason Current Amount Proposed Amount
Single-Family & Condo Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$52.30 $54.39
Multi-Family Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$47.25 $49.32
Apartments Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$41.75 $43.42
Single-Family Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$57.36 $59.65
Multi-Family Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$52.67 $54.97
Apartments Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$47.57 $49.47
Low Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$26.91 $27.99
Low Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$2.40 / hcf $2.50 / hcf
Medium Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$26.91 $27.99
Medium Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$2.75 / hcf $2.86 / hcf
High Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$26.91 $27.99
High Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$4.42/ hcf $4.60/ hcf
Schools - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$26.91 $27.99
Schools - Other Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$1.29 / ADA $1.34 / ADA
Low Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$23.63 $24.58
Low Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$2.40 / hcf $2.50 / hcf
Medium Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$23.63 $24.58
Medium Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$2.75 /hcf $2.86 /hcf
High Strength - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$23.63 $24.58
High Strength - Flow/Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF) Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$4.54 / hcf $4.60 / hcf
Schools - Fixed Monthly Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$23.63 $24.58
Schools - Other Year #2 of 5 Wastewater Rate Study-Reso #2024-11- 12-1605
$1.29/ ADA $1.34 / ADA
Commercial/Institutional - Contract Users, City Billed, County Maintained FY 2025-26 Proposed Rate Changes on Existing Fees
Municipal Utilities Department
Wastewater
Residential - Contract Users; County District Billing
Residential - City; Contract User, City Billed & Maintained Commercial/Institutional - City; Contract User, City Billed & Maintained City of Stockton I - 8 FY 2025-26 Proposed Fee Schedule EXHIBIT 2
698
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-0815, Version: 1
ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE 2005 DWSP EIR, AWARD A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO INFERRERA CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTACT CHANGE ORDER FOR
THE GROUNDWATER RECHARGE PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:
1. Approve the Addendum to the certified 2005 Environmental Impact Report for the Delta Water Supply Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2003112060), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15164, to support the proposed Groundwater Recharge Basins Project at the Delta Water Treatment Plant.
2. Approve findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.
3. Award a Professional Service Agreement to Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. of Shingle Springs, CA in the not-to-exceed amount of $728,760 for construction management services.
4. Adopt a resolution authorizing Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $5,714,565 with Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. (Gateway Pacific) to increase the capacity and efficiency of the groundwater recharge project, for a total contract amount not-to-exceed $17,197,813.
It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.
Summary
The Municipal Utilities Department (MUD) is comprised of three enterprise funds including Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Utilities. The Water Utility provides drinking water service to the northern and southern regions of the Stockton Metropolitan Area, with the California Water Service Company and San Joaquin County serving the central region. The Delta Water Treatment Plant began operation in May 2012, providing up to 30 million gallons per day of treated surface water from the San Joaquin Delta and Mokelumne River.
The DWTP was designed, in part, to protect the groundwater basin through conjunctive management of water resources and to improve the City’s water supply reliability portfolio. The construction of groundwater recharge basins adjacent to the treatment plant will increase the City’s conjunctive management capacity. When complete, the project will allow the City to directly recharge the City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 1 of 5
powered by Legistar™
699
File #: 25-0815, Version: 1
groundwater basin using water from sources including Water Right Permit 21176, contract supplies from Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID), and possibly stormwater runoff from the City of Lodi. Water recharged into the groundwater basin can be stored and pumped during dry years or extended droughts. The basins will also help to balance groundwater levels in the critically over-drafted Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Subbasin to help meet the Region’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act requirements.
If approved by the City Council, this action will adopt a resolution approving an Addendum to the 2005 Delta Water Supply Project Environmental Impact Report (Exhibit 1 to the Addendum Resolution), adopt a resolution awarding a $728,760 Professional Services Agreement to Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for construction management services (Exhibit 1 to the construction management services Resolution), and adopt a resolution authorizing Contract Change Order No. 1 (CCO No.1) with Gateway Pacific (Exhibit 1 to the CCO Resolution) in the amount of $5,714,565 for a total contract not-to-exceed amount of $17,197,813.
DISCUSSION
Background
In November 2005, the City Council certified the Delta Water Supply Project (DWSP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) State Clearinghouse number 2003112060. The 2005 DWSP EIR included a future groundwater recharge program and evaluated environmental impacts associated with implementation of groundwater recharge basins at the DWTP site.
In 2012, the MUD dedicated the Delta Water Supply Project (DWSP), a key component of the City’s conjunctive use program and to help balance groundwater levels in the Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Subbasin. The DWSP provides surface water supplies to nearly 200,000 customers in north Stockton. The project included a river diversion and pumping station to convey water to the Delta Water Treatment Plant (DWTP) located along Lower Sacramento Road, north of Eight Mile Road between the City of Stockton and the City of Lodi.
The proposed project site encompasses approximately 130 acres and has a construction footprint of about 70 acres. The groundwater recharge infrastructure is designed to divert surplus surface water from both the Delta and the Mokelumne River to replenish the local groundwater basin.
In 2023, Geosyntec Consultants completed a feasibility study evaluating the suitability of implementing recharge basins at DWTP. The study concluded that soil conditions at the site are favorable for groundwater infiltration. Based on these findings, MUD staff solicited professional services for design, permitting, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance, and construction of the recharge basins.
On September 10, 2024, by Resolution 2024-09-10-1207, the City Council awarded a design-build contract to Gateway Pacific to design and construct the recharge basins. The scope of work includes construction of three recharge basins, dry wells, access roads, integration into the existing SCADA system, underground piping, automatic modulating valves, flow meters, and development of operational and maintenance recharge programs.
This project helps implement public outreach goals and proposed projects within the Eastern San City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 2 of 5
powered by Legistar™
700
File #: 25-0815, Version: 1
Joaquin Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP), which was developed in accordance with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). The project addresses critical overdraft conditions and promotes long-term groundwater sustainability for the region.
The Water Advisory Group and Council Water Committee reviewed staff recommendations to adopt the Addendum to the 2005 DWSP EIR, award a contract to Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for construction management services, and approve CCO No. 1 to the Gateway Pacific contract at meetings held on July 3, 2025, and July 10, 2025, respectively.
Present Situation
To comply with CEQA, an Addendum to the certified 2005 DWSP EIR was prepared by Helix Environmental Planning, a subcontractor to Gateway Pacific. The Addendum incorporates updated technical analyses in areas such as air quality, biological resources, and cultural resources, confirming that the proposed enhancements do not result in environmental impacts beyond those previously disclosed in the 2005 DWSP EIR.
On May 1, 2025, MUD staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for construction management services. On May 29, 2025, the following six firms submitted proposals:
Company Location Cost
Esposo Property Maintenance And Construction Stockton, CA $595,212 Alpha CM, Inc Folsom, CA $617,891
Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc Shingle Springs, CA $728,760 Dillon & Murphy Engineering Lodi, CA $866,506
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc Stockton, CA $905,827
Hazen and Sawyer Sacramento, CA $1,883,730
A selection committee evaluated the proposals based on criteria including the firms’ understanding of the scope of work, proposed project approach, experience with similar services, team qualifications, and overall cost. Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. met or exceeded expectations in all categories and was determined to be the most qualified firm.
In addition, construction of the recharge basins requires a full-time inspector and a part-time construction manager to ensure all work is completed in accordance with the approved engineering design drawings. MUD does not have the internal staffing or technical expertise to perform these functions; therefore, it is necessary to hire Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. to provide construction management services.
On initial review of the draft project design plans, it was found that modifications to the original design -build contract with Gateway Pacific were necessary to increase the estimated recharge capacity from approximately 11,000 acre-feet per year to nearly 20,000 acre-feet per year. Upgrades to the habitat plan and visitor center design will also support educational outreach initiatives for local schools and the community about water conservation and sustainability, groundwater recharge, and the protection of natural ecosystems.
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 3 of 5
powered by Legistar™
701
File #: 25-0815, Version: 1
Environmental Clearance
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 allows for an addendum to a certified EIR if changes to the project do not result in new significant environmental effects or substantially more severe impacts. The proposed Groundwater Recharge Basins Project:
· Does not involve new or expanded project elements outside the scope analyzed in the 2005 DWSP EIR.
· Does not trigger any new significant impacts not previously disclosed. · Remains consistent with the original project objectives and environmental mitigation framework.
Therefore, an Addendum to the certified 2005 DWSP EIR satisfies environmental requirements for this project.
Findings
Pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070, the City Council may approve findings which support and justify an exception to the competitive bidding process. The following findings support and justify an exception:
1. A strict cost-competitive basis for the selection of professional services may lower the quality and thoroughness of the services provided because it does not consider experience, reputation, quality of work and track record handling similar projects.
2. Considering the size, complexity, and schedule requirements of the project, the City does not have sufficient staff resources nor the expertise to act as the inspector or the construction manager for a groundwater recharge construction project.
3. Use of the RFP process is appropriate for this Professional Services Contract because it relies on the evaluation of professional qualifications and performance as the basis for selection of a vendor. Use of these criteria ensures that the selected firm will provide the highest quality professional service, which is in the public interest.
4. The City negotiated a contract following the solicitation of competitive proposals in accordance with SMC section 3.68.070.A.3.
The proposed resolution will award a Professional Services Agreement to Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc, in the not-to-exceed amount of $728,760 for construction management services.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
There are sufficient funds available in the Water Capital Improvement Projects Fund under Project Number UH21005 to cover the costs associated with executing a $728,760 contract with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for construction management services, and approving a contract change order to Gateway Pacific in the amount of $5,714,565 for a total contract not-to- City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 4 of 5
powered by Legistar™
702
File #: 25-0815, Version: 1
exceed amount of $17,197,813. No additional funding is required or being requested in connection with the approval of the Addendum to the 2005 DWSP EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2003112060).
The City has secured three separate grant awards to support this project:
· SGMA Round 1 Grant - $300,000 (fully received in FY 2023-24) · IRWM Grant - $2,000,000 (two reimbursement requests submitted to date totaling $250,000) · WaterSMART Grant - $400,000 ($165,000 received to date in FY 2024-25) This action has no impact on the General Fund or any other unrestricted funds.
City of Stockton Printed on 8/7/2025Page 5 of 5
powered by Legistar™
703
Resolution No.
STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED DELTA WATER SUPPLY PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH No. 2003112060)
The City Council previously certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Delta Water Supply Project (DWSP) (State Clearinghouse No. 2003112060) on November 8, 2005, which analyzed the environmental impacts of the DWSP including a potential groundwater recharge component; and
The Municipal Utilities Department (MUD) now propose s to construct three groundwater recharge basins and associated infrastructure improvements at the Delta Water Treatment Plant (DWTP), located at 11373 N. Lower Sacramento Road, on City - owned property and operated by MUD; and
The proposed project is consi stent with the objectives of the original DWSP and will help advance groundwater sustainability efforts in alignment with the Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP); and
An Addendum to the certified DWSP EIR was prepared by Helix Enviro nmental Planning, a subcontractor to Gateway Pacific Contractors, to evaluate the site -specific impacts of the proposed groundwater recharge basins; and
The Addendum includes updated technical analyses of air quality, biological resources, and cultural re sources and concludes that the proposed project would not result in new or substantially more severe environmental impacts than those previously identified in the certified DWSP EIR; and
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) G uidelines section 15164, the preparation of an Addendum is appropriate when changes to a project do not result in new significant impacts or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified impacts; and
Staff recommend approval of an addendum to the certified 2005 DWSP EIR (sch no. 2003112060); now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study prepared as part of the Addendum to the certified Delta Water Supply Project EIR (SCH No. 2003112060) , the proposed Project would not have new or substantially more severe significant effects on the environment 704
that have not already been addressed by the certified Stockton DWSP Program EIR (SCH No. 2003112060), no su bstantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken, and no new information of substantial importance to the project has been identified.
2. However, minor technical changes or additions are necessary, and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Addendum to the certified Delta Water Supply Project EIR (SCH No. 2003112060) was prepared and is hereby approved, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by this reference.
3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED August 12, 2025 .
CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:
KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
705
Delta Water Treatment Plant
Groundwater Recharge Basins
Project
Final
Initial Study/Addendum
Prepared for:
City of Stockton
425 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Prepared by:
HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.
1180 Iron Point Road, Suite 130
Folsom, CA 95630
April 2025 | 08030.00004.001
EXHIBIT 1
706
This page intentionally left blank
EXHIBIT 1
707
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
Initial Study Information Sheet ........................................................................................................ 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 INITIAL STUDY/ADDENDUM................................................................................................ 2
1.2 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION .............................................................................................. 3
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 4
2.1 STOCKTON DELTA WATER SUPPLY PROJECT PROGRAM EIR .............................................. 4
2.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................................................................... 4
2.3 PROJECT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL STUDIES.............................................................................. 5
3.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING .......................................................................................... 5
3.1 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................ 5
3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................................................................................. 6
4.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................... 6
4.1 GROUNDWATER RECHARGE BASIN COMPONENTS ............................................................ 6
4.2 WATER SUPPLY ................................................................................................................... 7
4.3 VIEWING PLATFORM AND RESTROOM ............................................................................... 8
4.4 ACCESS, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING ............................................................................... 8
4.5 SIGNAGE AND LANDSCAPE ................................................................................................. 8
4.6 FENCING AND SECURITY ..................................................................................................... 8
4.7 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND STOCKPILE AREAS .......................................................... 9
4.8 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................... 9
4.9 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS ................................................................................ 9
5.0 DETERMINATION ................................................................................................................. 11
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST ......................................................................... 12 I. LAND USE, RECREATION, AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES .................................................... 13 II. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY ................................................................................... 23 III. DRAINAGE AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT ................................................................. 31 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................. 37 V. AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................... 52 VI. NOISE ................................................................................................................................ 59 VII. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/PUBLIC HEALTH ....................................................................... 65 VIII. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ...................................................................................... 69 EXHIBIT 1
708
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.)
IX. PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES/ENERGY ........................................................................ 75 X. CULTURAL RESOURCES ..................................................................................................... 81 XI. DELTA WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 86 XII. GROUNDWATER RESOURCES ........................................................................................... 91
7.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 95
8.0 PREPARERS .......................................................................................................................... 98
LIST OF TABLES
No. Title Page
1 Annual Construction Emissions. .................................................................................................... 55 2 Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure for Noise-Sensitive Land Uses Part II: Stationary Noise Sources ........................................................................................................................................... 61 3 Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure for Noise-Sensitive Land Uses Part II: Noise-Use Related Noise Standard ............................................................................................................................... 61 4 Previous Studies Conducted within 0.25-Mile of the Project Site ................................................. 81 5 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within 0.25-Mile of the Project Site .............................. 82
LIST OF APPENDICES
A Figures
B Biological Resources Assessment
C Air Quality Analysis
D Cultural Resources Assessment
EXHIBIT 1
709
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
AF/year acre-feet per year
AG-40 General Agriculture, 40-acre minimum
A/G General Agriculture
ALUC Airport Land Use Commission
ALUCP Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
Amsl above mean sea level
APE Area of Potential Effects
APN Assessor’s Parcel Number
AWWA American Water Works Association
b
gs below ground surface
BMP Best management practices
BRA Biological Resources Assessment
C
alEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
Cal/EPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CAP Climate Action Plan
CARB California Air Resources Board
CBC California Building Code
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CESA California Endangered Species Act
CGS California Geological Survey
CHP California Highway Patrol
CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System City City of Stockton
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
CNPS California Native Plant Society
CO carbon monoxide
COSMA City of Stockton Metropolitan Area
County San Joaquin County
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
CVRQCB Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board CWA Clean Water Act
CY cubic yard
dB decibels
DOC California Department of Conservation
DPM diesel particulate matter
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
DWR California Department of Water Resources
EXHIBIT 1
710
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (cont.)
DWSP Delta Water Supply Project
DWTP Delta Water Treatment Plant
E
IR Environmental Impact Report
EOP Emergency Operations Plan
EQ Zapp Earthquake Hazards Zone Application
ESA Endangered Species Act
ESJGWA Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Authority
°F d
egrees Fahrenheit
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
G
SA Groundwater Sustainability Agency
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan
HD
PE high density polyethylene
HMMP Hazardous Materials Management Plan
Hz Hertz
IS
Initial Study
JP
A Joint Powers Authority
L
HMP Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
LOS Level of Service
LRA Local Responsibility Area
m
gd million gallons per day
MND mitigated negative declaration
MRZ Mineral Resource Zone
N2O nitrous oxide
NAAQS national ambient air quality standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NOX nitrogen oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPL National Priorities List
NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
NSLU noise-sensitive land uses
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
OHP Office of Historic Preservation
EXHIBIT 1
711
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (cont.)
OMR State Office of Mining Reclamation
OSFM Office of the State Fire Marshal
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PM10 coarse particulate matter
PM2.5 fine particulate matter
PPV peak particle velocity
PRC Public Resources Code
Q
SD Qualified SWPPP Developer
R
OG Reactive Organic Gases
RWCF Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facility
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SC
ADA Supervisory Controls and Data Acquisition
SCH State Clearinghouse
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
SJCOG San Joaquin Council of Governments
SJMSCP San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan SJV San Joaquin Valley
SJVAB San Joaquin Valley Air Basin
SJVAPCD San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District SLF Sacred Lands File
SO2 sulfur dioxide
SR State Route
SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
SWQCCP Stormwater Quality Control Criteria Plan
SWRCB State Water Resource Control Board
T
AC Toxic Air Contaminant
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
U
BC Uniform Building Code
UPRR Union Pacific Railroad
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
USCS Unified Soil Classification System
V
HFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
VOC volatile organic compound
W
ID Woodbridge Irrigation District
WSP welded steel pipeline
WTP water treatment plant
EXHIBIT 1
712
INITIAL STUDY INFORMATION SHEET
1. Project title: Delta Water Treatment Plant Groundwater Recharge Basins Project
2. Lead agency name and address: City of Stockton
425 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
3. Contact person and phone number: Danny Trejo, Program Manager II (209) 937-8782
4. Project location: 11373 N. Lower Sacramento Road, San Joaquin County, CA
5. General plan designation: General Agriculture (A/G)
6. Zoning: General Agriculture, 40 acres minimum (AG-40)
7. Descr
iption of project:
The proposed Delta Water Treatment Plant Groundwater Recharge Basins Project (Project) would include construction of three groundwater recharge basins and associated site improvements and infrastructure adjacent to the existing City of Stockon’s Delta Water Treatment Plant (DWTP). The Project would be located at 11373 N. Lower Sacramento Road on City-owned property in San Joaquin County, on Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 059-030-02. The Project site is conservatively estimated to encompass a total of 134.2 acres; however, the Project footprint would comprise approximately 78 acres adjacent to the existing DWTP. The proposed groundwater basins, viewing platform, parking lot, and associated infrastructure would encompass approximately 64 acres of the Project site, and the proposed temporary stockpile areas would encompass approximately 14 acres of the Project site.
8. Surrounding land uses and setting:
The Project site is adjacent to the City’s existing DWTP and is surrounded by agricultural fields to the north, agricultural fields and N. Lower Sacramento Road to the east, agricultural fields and single-family residential homes to the south, and the DWTP and agricultural fields to the west.
9. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement:
• Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) • San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) • San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG)
• State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
EXHIBIT 1
713
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 INITIAL STUDY/ADDENDUM
HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) has prepared this Initial Study (IS)/Addendum on behalf of the City of Stockton (City) per the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000, et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000, et seq.). The City certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (Program EIR) for the Stockton Delta Water Supply Project (DWSP) in October 2005 (State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 2003112060). This IS/Addendum addresses whether the proposed Delta Water Treatment Plant Groundwater Recharge Basins Project (proposed Project) may cause significant effects on the environment beyond what was analyzed in the certified Stockton DWSP Program EIR. Consistent with PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15152 and 15162, this IS/Addendum focuses on any effects on the environment that are specific to the proposed Project which were not analyzed as potentially significant effects in the certified DWSP Program EIR, or for which substantial new information shows that identified effects would be more significant than described in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
CEQA Guidelines Regarding an Addendum
Pursuant to PRC Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no subsequent or supplemental EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, based on substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
• Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects;
• Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
• New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following:
o The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; o Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
o Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or o Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
EXHIBIT 1
714
Where none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 are present, the lead agency must determine whether to prepare an Addendum or whether no further CEQA documentation is required (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[b]). An Addendum is appropriate where some minor technical changes or additions to the project or the previously certified EIR are necessary, but there are no new or substantially more severe significant impacts than those identified in the previously certified EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164).
1.2 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
This IS/Addendum evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project. The document is divided into the following sections:
1.0 Introduction – This chapter provides an introduction, CEQA guidelines regarding an addendum, and describes the purpose and organization of the document.
2.0 Project Background – This chapter provides an overview of the certified Stockton DWSP Program EIR, summarizes the Project purpose and need, and lists the Project-specific technical studies prepared and incorporated into this IS/Addendum.
3.0 Project Location and Setting – This chapter provides information on the existing physical conditions of the Project site, as well as a brief description of the existing use.
4.0 Project Description – This chapter discusses the proposed Project in detail.
5.0 Determination – This chapter provides a determination if the Project will or will not have a new significant impact on the environment compared to the certified Stockton DWSP Program EIR. This chapter determines if the appropriate CEQA document is an addendum, tiered mitigated negative declaration (MND), tiered EIR, or if nothing further is required as the environmental impacts of the Project were previously analyzed in a prior CEQA document, and if potential significant impacts have been avoided or mitigated.
6.0 Environmental Initial Study Checklist – This chapter provides a description of the environmental setting and impact analysis for each of the environmental subject areas analyzed in the certified Stockton DWSP Program EIR. Project impact analysis is provided in response to subject-specific questions for each environmental subject area analyzed in the certified Stockton DWSP Program EIR, and an impact determination is made for each question. Impact determinations may be “no new or substantially more severe impact,” “less than significant impact,” “less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated,” or “new significant or substantially more severe impact” in response to the questions included in the environmental checklist for each environmental subject area.
7.0 References – This chapter identifies documents, websites, people, and other sources consulted during the preparation of this IS/Addendum.
8.0 Preparers – This chapter identifies who worked on the preparation of this IS/Addendum.
EXHIBIT 1
715
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 STOCKTON DELTA WATER SUPPLY PROJECT PROGRAM EIR
The DWSP Program EIR was prepared for the City of Stockton to analyze the DWSP as a new supplemental water supply for the City of Stockton Metropolitan Area (COSMA). The proposed components of the DWSP included a new water intake facility, raw water transmission pipelines from the intake facility to the water treatment plant (WTP), a WTP, an electrical power supply, treated water pipelines between the WTP and City’s distribution system, and a groundwater recharge program. The DWSP Program EIR was certified by the City of Stockton City Council (SCH No. 2003112060) on November 8, 2005 (City 2005). At the time this IS/Addendum was prepared, the water intake facility, raw water transmission pipelines, WTP, electrical power supply, and treated water pipelines were constructed and are currently in operation.
The certified DWSP Program EIR contemplated a future groundwater recharge program as part of the DWSP, which would be developed following the preparation of a feasibility study to assess the suitability of the potential project site. In December 2023, a Feasibility Study Report was prepared by Geosyntec Consultants to evaluate the potential for groundwater recharge at the City’s existing Delta Water Treatment Plant (DWTP) site. The Feasibility Study Report concluded that the soils beneath the proposed Project site would be suitable for groundwater recharge (2023 Geosyntec Consultants).
Therefore, the City proposes to construct three groundwater recharge basins and associated site improvements and infrastructure at the DWTP site. The certified DWSP Program EIR evaluated the potential environmental effects for each of the individual DWSP components, including the water intake facility, raw water transmission pipelines from the intake facility to the WTP, WTP, and treated water pipelines between the WTP and City’s distribution system. Therefore, since the proposed Project would be located within the WTP site evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR, this IS/Addendum compares the proposed Project impacts to the impacts evaluated for the development of the WTP.
This IS/Addendum compares the proposed Project’s impacts to the impacts evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR for each of the identified environment topic areas, excluding Section 4.1, Fisheries.
Section 4.1, Fisheries, of the certified DWSP Program EIR discusses potential impacts on fishery resources in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta from implementation of the DWSP, which included the in-river intake facility and in-bank intake facility. This section of the certified DWSP Program EIR was only applicable to those two components of the DWSP, and therefore, it did not evaluate the impacts on fishery resources from implementation of the WTP as it was not applicable. For these reasons, Section
4.1 of the certified DWSP Program EIR is not applicable to the proposed Project and is not further analyzed in this IS/Addendum.
2.2 PROJECT PURPOSE
In 2014, the California legislature, including Assembly Bill (AB) 1739, Senate Bill (SB) 1168, and SB 1319, enacted the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) in response to the continued overdraft of California’s groundwater resources, requiring local agencies to form groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) for the high and medium basins, and to develop and implement groundwater sustainability plans (GSPs) to avoid undesirable results and mitigated overdraft from groundwater basins within 20 years.
EXHIBIT 1
716
The Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Subbasin (Subbasin No. 5-022.01) is one of 21 basins and subbasins identified by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as being in a state of critical overdraft. As defined by SGMA, "A basin is subject to critical overdraft when continuation of present water management practices would probably result in significant adverse overdraft-related environmental, social, or economic impacts” (DWR 2024a). SGMA requires preparation of a GSP to address measures necessary to attain sustainable conditions in the Subbasin. Within the framework of SGMA, sustainability is generally defined as long-term reliability of the groundwater supply and the absence of undesirable results. According to the SGMA 2019 Basin Prioritization, the Eastern San Joaquin Subbasin was identified as a critically overdrafted and high priority basin (DWR 2024b). As such, the Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Authority (ESJGWA) was formed in 2017 in response to SGMA. A Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement establishes the ESJGWA and is composed of 16 GSAs, which includes the City of Stockton.
Efforts began in 2019 to prepare the draft Eastern San Joaquin Subbasin GSP, which was most recently revised in 2022 (ESJGWA 2022). The GSP outlines the need to reduce overdraft conditions through either the replacement of groundwater use (offset) or supplement groundwater supplies (recharge) to meet current and future water demands. The proposed Project has been identified in the Eastern San Joaquin Subbasin GSP to supplement groundwater supplies in the subbasin. In 2022, the City received a 2022 SGMA Implementation Round 1 Grant to assist in funding a geotechnical and hydrogeologic study at the proposed Project site, which included the 2023 Feasibility Study Report.
The purpose of the proposed Project is to improve water supply reliability and raise groundwater levels in the Eastern San Joaquin Subbasin. Additionally, the proposed groundwater recharge basins would be designed and constructed to provide ancillary benefits including habitat for birds, providing water, shelter, and/or breeding places during their migration along the Pacific Flyway.
2.3 PROJECT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL STUDIES
The following Project-specific technical reports, assessments, and/or surveys were prepared or conducted to support the impact analysis included in this IS/Addendum and are incorporated by reference:
• Biological R
esources Assessment, February 2025, prepared by HELIX.
• Air Quality Analysis, February 2025, prepared by HELIX. • Cultural Resources Assessment, February 2025, prepared by HELIX.
3.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING
3.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The pr
oposed Project would be constructed at the City of Stockon Municipal Utilities Department (MUD) DWTP, which is located between the City of Stockton and City of Lodi, at 11373 N. Lower Sacramento Road in unincorporated San Joaquin County (County) on APN 059-030-02. The Project site is situated in Sections 33 and 34 of Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, and is depicted on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Lodi South, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle. The Project site is conservatively estimated to encompass 134.2 acres; however, the permanent and temporary Project EXHIBIT 1
717
impact footprint would comprise a total of approximately 78 acres adjacent to the existing DWTP. See Figure 1, Site and Vicinity Map, and Figure 2, Aerial Map, in Appendix A.
3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project is located at the City’s DWTP, which currently treats surface water diverted from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) and Mokelumne River. The DWTP site is developed with paved roads, associated infrastructure, and three concrete-lined sludge basins to support the DWTP operations. The Project site is surrounded by agricultural fields to the north, agricultural fields and N.
Lower Sacramento Road to the east, agricultural fields and single-family residential homes to the south, and the DWTP and agricultural fields to the west.
4.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project would include construction of three groundwater recharge basins and associated infrastructure at the City-owned DWTP. The proposed infrastructure would be constructed to divert raw surface water from existing sources to the new groundwater recharge basins during surplus. The Project would also construct a new access roadway, parking lot, and viewing platform. These proposed permanent Project components would encompass approximately 64 acres of the Project site. See below for the proposed Project components in more detail.
4.1 GROUNDWATER RECHARGE BASIN COMPONENTS
Groundwater Recharge Basins
The proposed Project would include construction of three groundwater recharge basins of the following approximate sizes: 16.6 acres, 15.4 acres, and 13.5 acres. Each groundwater recharge basin would be excavated to about three feet below ground surface (bgs), and the top of the perimeter roads would be approximately five feet above grade. The interior levees of the recharge basins would be filled at a 3:1 slope ratio to encourage growth of vegetation along the perimeters.
Forebays
A forebay would be constructed along the western side of each groundwater recharge basin. The corners of the forebays would be lined with riprap, and the slopes would be constructed at a 2:1 ratio.
Aboveground and Underground Piping
An existing 54-inch raw water connection is located in the western portion of the DWTP. The proposed 30-inch motorized butterfly valve would be installed above ground and adjacent to the existing 54-inch raw water connection. This proposed 30-inch motorized butterfly valve would connect to the existing DWTP Supervisory Controls and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and would serve as an isolation valve for the proposed groundwater recharge basins. From the proposed 30-inch butterfly valve, a proposed underground 36-inch welded steel pipeline (WSP) would move east for approximately 1,000 feet until it reaches three proposed 24-inch electrically actuated butterfly valves, that would be used to control flows to each proposed groundwater recharge basin. The three proposed 24-inch butterfly valves would then be connected to the existing DWTP SCADA system. From the proposed three 24-inch butterfly valves, three proposed 30-inch high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipelines would convey flows directly EXHIBIT 1
718
into each proposed forebay. A proposed concrete manhole in each proposed forebay would be used to dissipate energy upward. After the water flow settles in the proposed forebays, the water would flow over one of three proposed 150-foot-long concrete curbs, located between the proposed forebays and the proposed groundwater recharge basins. Each proposed curb would be slightly lower in elevation to encourage water to flow to the entire length of the proposed forebay.
Dry Wells
Two dry wells would be constructed in each of the proposed groundwater recharge basins. The dry wells would be constructed by excavating down to approximately 20 feet below grade to increase groundwater recharge volumes in addition to the recharge volume that would occur through the groundwater recharge basin bottoms. The dry well holes would be excavated with steep slopes and would be filled with washed angular crushed rock. At grade, the dry wells would be covered with fabric, and two feet of gravel would be placed above the fabric. The gravel may need to be cleaned every few years.
Infiltration Wells
Each groundwater recharge basin would include installation of a large diameter vertical infiltration well, which would be placed in areas with high permeabilities to depths of 20 to 50 feet bgs to increase groundwater recharge volumes. The infiltration wells would be placed in large diameter borings filled with gravel to maximize the amount of water that can be directed to these depths. Trenches filled with gravel would be sloped towards the infiltration wells to allow water flow towards these areas. The infiltration rate for each groundwater recharge basin would range from approximately 15,000 acre-feet per year (AF/year) to 30,000 AF/year, assuming the basins are used 335 days per year.
Monitoring Wells
Five nested groundwater monitoring wells, similar to the existing Monitoring Well MW-1, would be installed within the Project site to monitor groundwater conditions. The monitoring wells would extend 200 feet bgs and would be installed in accordance with the SJCEHD requirements. Each well would be monitored with a single pressure transducer on a regular basis.
4.2 WATER SUPPLY
According to the draft Preliminary Scope Validation Memo prepared for the proposed Project in December 2024, the City currently has about 21,000 AF/year of raw water from existing surface water supplies from the Delta and Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID) or Mokelumne River Integrated Conjunctive Use Program (MICUP) available for recharge (NEXGEN 2024). The WID has the authority to divert water from the Mokelumne River (Lodi Lake) via the main diversion canal in Woodbridge, which runs underneath Lower Sacramento Road and feeds the majority of the canals to the south. This raw surface water would be used to supply the proposed groundwater recharge basins during times of surface water surplus.
Assuming 335 days for recharge in the groundwater basins, the 21,000 AF/year of available existing water supply would require an average infiltration rate of about 1.44 feet/day. The recharge volume would be accomplished through the groundwater recharge basins bottom and dry wells within the basins.
EXHIBIT 1
719
4.3 VIEWING PLATFORM AND RESTROOM
A shaded viewing platform would be constructed in the northwestern portion of the Project site, east of the existing WTP facility, to allow visitors to view migratory birds that are anticipated to use the proposed basins during their migration along the Pacific Flyway, which is a major north-south flyway for migratory birds that spans from Alaska to South America. The viewing platform is anticipated to be approximately 2,000 square feet (sf) in size and 15 feet tall. The viewing platform would be constructed immediately north of the proposed recharge basins and would be constructed on an elevated surface similar in height to the top of the basin’s perimeter berms (five feet amsl). The height of the viewing platform from existing grade would be approximately 20 feet.
A detached prefabricated restroom would be installed adjacent to the proposed viewing platform for visitor use. The proposed restroom would be approximately 126 sf in size. If feasible, the restroom would tie into existing sewer lines that run along Lower Sacramento Road. However, if connecting to existing nearby utilities is not feasible, then a new septic tank would be installed for the proposed restroom and would be serviced approximately six times per year.
4.4 ACCESS, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING
The DWTP includes an existing staff parking area near the northern portion of the DWTP and has two existing vehicular access driveways, a northern and southern access driveway, off N. Lower Sacramento Road. The DWTP includes existing internal roadways that connect the two existing access driveways.
The proposed Project would construct an access roadway located west of the groundwater recharge basins which would also connect the two existing access driveways. A new parking area in the northeast corner of the Project site would be constructed to provide parking for visitors and would include one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible van stall and one standard ADA accessible stall. It is anticipated that the parking lot would include approximately 14 standard parking stalls. The proposed access roadway and parking lot would be designed with sufficient vehicle width to accommodate turnaround for a standard-sized school bus.
4.5 SIGNAGE AND LANDSCAPE
Educational signage would be located near the proposed viewing platform. Landscape improvements would include the area immediately adjacent to the proposed parking area and hydroseed would be added along the slopes of the levees of the proposed basins. New landscaping would include California native species and/or low water-use plantings.
4.6 FENCING AND SECURITY
Wrought iron fencing would be located along N. Lower Sacramento Road and the northern boundary of the Project site. Chain link fencing would be located along the southern boundary of the Project site and on the western boundary of the northern groundwater recharge basin.
EXHIBIT 1
720
4.7 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND STOCKPILE AREAS
Construction of the proposed Project may begin as early as May of 2025 and is anticipated to be completed in June 2026. It is anticipated that construction of the three groundwater recharge basins would occur concurrently. Per the Project engineer, debris and vegetation from site preparation and soil from basin excavation would be temporarily stockpiled on the DWTP site. The proposed temporary stockpile areas would be located west of the groundwater recharge basins and adjacent to the City’s DWTP and would encompass approximately 14 acres of the Project site. Following excavation and temporary stockpiling, the excavated soils would be used on-site to construct the perimeter berms for the proposed basins, and remaining soil (if any) would be balanced on-site. It is anticipated that no off- site export of debris, vegetation, or soil would be required.
Approximately 219 cubic yards (CY) of aggregate would be imported during underground utilities and 500 CY of concrete and aggregate would be imported during basin and berm construction, per the Project engineer. Additionally, per the Project engineer, 296 CY of asphalt concrete/aggregate base course (AC/AB) would be imported during paving and 140 CY of crushed rock would be imported during construction of the percolation wells.
4.8 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Operational activities associated with the proposed Project would include occasional maintenance trips for the on-site restroom and maintenance of landscaping. Per the Project engineer, a truck would service the septic tanks six times a year (if connection to existing utilities is not feasible), and landscape maintenance, including weed and irrigation maintenance, would occur two to four times a year and additionally as needed. Staff that currently manage/operate the City-owned DWTP would perform the operation and maintenance (O&M) tasks required for the proposed Project, and no new employees would be required to support the proposed Project.
Each groundwater recharge basin is anticipated to be used annually for 335 days. This operation would allow for a “drying out” period of 30 days over the year for each groundwater recharge basin. “Drying out” periods would be staggered for the three groundwater recharge basins so that recharge could be conducted throughout the year. Allowing “drying out” periods has been shown to increase the efficiency of a groundwater recharge basin. These periods could also be used to conduct any other maintenance requirements including clearing out the infiltration pipelines, removal of vegetation that occurs, etc.
Operation of the proposed Project would also include infrequent educational visits from local public or private schools, organizations, other interested groups, etc. as allowed by the DWTP facility management. It is anticipated that educational visits would be limited to one school bus per visit (up to 72 students, per standard school bus sizes) and would occur between typical daytime school hours and operational hours of the DWTP.
4.9 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS
A list
ing and brief description of the approvals and/or regulatory permits required to implement the proposed Project are provided below. This environmental document is intended to address the environmental impacts associated with the following discretionary actions and approvals.
EXHIBIT 1
721
City of Stockton
• Consideration of the Environmental Document: City of Stockton will act as the Lead Agency as defined by CEQA and will have authority to determine if the environmental document is adequate under CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
• Project Approval: City of Stockon City Council will consider approval of the Project.
Agencies
• San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department: Well and Boring Permit for the proposed monitoring wells.
• San Joaquin Council of Governments: San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP).
• Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board: National Pollutant Discharge Eliminated System (NPDES) Construction General Permit, which requires the preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
EXHIBIT 1
722
5.0 DETERMINATION
The City of Stockton previously certified the DWSP Program EIR, and on the basis of this initial evaluation and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines:
☒ I find that the proposed Project WOULD NOT have new or substantially more severe significant effects on the environment that have not already been addressed by the certified Stockton DWSP Program EIR (SCH No. 2003112060), no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project will be undertaken, and no new information of substantial importance to the Project has been identified. However, minor technical changes or additions are necessary, and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an ADDENDUM has been prepared.
☐ I find that although the Project WOULD have one or more new or substantially more severe significant effects on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because new Project-specific mitigation measures have been identified that would reduce the effects to a less than significant level. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, a TIERED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared.
☐ I find that the Project MAY have a new or substantially more severe significant effect on the environment that was not adequately addressed in the certified DWSP Program EIR, and there may not be feasible mitigation which would reduce the new or substantially more severe significant effect to a less than significant level. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, a TIERED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Signature Date
Printed Name For
EXHIBIT 1
723
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
The Lead Agency has defined the column headings in the environmental checklist as follows:
A. “New or Substantially More Severe Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant or substantially more severe. If there are one or more “New or Substantially More Severe Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
B. “Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the inclusion of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “New or Substantially More Severe Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” All mitigation measures are described, including a brief explanation of how the measures reduce the effect to a less than significant level. Mitigation measures from the certified DWSP Program EIR are cross-referenced as applicable to the proposed Project.
C. “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where the Project does not create an impact that exceeds a stated significance threshold.
D. “No New or Substantially More Severe Impact” applies where a Project does not create a new impact in that category compared to the determinations made for an existing and certified EIR.
The explanation of each issue outlined in the following pages identifies the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration [CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D)]. Where appropriate, the discussion identifies the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identifies where earlier analyses are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identifies which effects from the checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and states whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,” describes the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the Project.
EXHIBIT 1
724
I. LAND USE, RECREATION, AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
Impact Analysis Questions (Table 3.2-1 of the
certified DWSP Program EIR):
LU-1: Construction of the proposed DWSP
could physically divide an established
community.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-2: Construction of the proposed DWSP
facilities could reduce access to, or interfere
with the use of, existing recreational facilities.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-3: Construction of DWSP facilities could
conflict with existing agricultural uses. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-4: The proposed DWSP could conflict with
any applicable land use plan, policy or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over
the project adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-5: Construction of the DWSP WTP and raw
water pipeline appurtenant facilities would
convert economically viable prime farmland
and farmland of statewide importance to
nonagricultural use.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-6: The proposed DWSP could conflict with
existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-7: The proposed DWSP could involve other
changes in the existing environment that, due
to its location or nature, could individually or
cumulatively result in loss of economically
viable farmland.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-8: The proposed DWSP could indirectly: (a)
increase the use of existing neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities
such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility could occur or be accelerated; or
(b) include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which could have an adverse physical
effect on the environment.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-9: Operation of the DWSP intake could
reduce access to, or interfere with the use of,
existing recreational facilities.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
EXHIBIT 1
725
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
LU-10: The DWSP intake and WTP would have
a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas,
substantially damage scenic resources, or
substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
LU-11: The DWSP intake and WTP would
create a new source of substantial light or
glare that would adversely affect nighttime
views in the area.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Affected Environment
Land Use
The proposed Project site is City-owned property located in unincorporated San Joaquin County, immediately north and west of the City of Stockton and south of the City of Lodi. The Project site is located outside of the City of Stockton limits, and, therefore, does not have a zoning designation within the City. However, although the Project site is outside of the City’s sphere of influence, the City’s General Plan 2040 Land Use Map designates the Project site as Institutional (City 2024).
The 2035 San Joaquin County General Plan, most recently updated in 2016, is a comprehensive, long- term document that serves to guide all future land use, development, preservation, and resource conservation decisions in the unincorporated areas of the County. The Project site is designated General Agriculture (A/G) in the County General Plan and is zoned General Agriculture (AG-40). The A/G land use designation provides for large-scale agricultural production and associated processing, sales, and support uses. This land use designation generally applies to areas outside areas planned for urban development where soils are capable of producing a wide variety of crops and/or support grazing.
Typical building types include low-intensity structures associated with farming and agricultural processing and sales (County 2016). The General Agriculture zone was established to preserve agricultural land for the continuation of commercial agricultural enterprises and implements the A/G land use designation of the County General Plan (County 2024a).
No agricultural activities or timber management currently occur on the Project site, nor is the Project site under a Williamson Act contract. According to the California Important Farmland Finder Interactive Map prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) of the California Department of Conservation (DOC), the undeveloped eastern portion of the Project site is classified as Farmland of Local Importance and the western portion of the Project site is classified as Urban and Built- Up Land. The DOC defines Farmland of Local Importance as land of importance to the local agricultural economy as determined by the County's Board of Supervisors and a local advisory committee. Urban and Built-Up land is defined as land occupied by structures or infrastructure with a building density of at least one unit to one and one-half acres, or approximately six structures to a 10-acre parcel (DOC 2024).
EXHIBIT 1
726
Recreation
San Joaquin County Parks and Recreation is responsible for the planning and management of regional parks in the unincorporated County. Additionally, the City of Stockton maintains 66 City parks and open space areas, ranging from two-acre neighborhood sites to 64-acre community parks. The closest recreation facilities to the Project site include: Dorotha Mae Pitts Park, located approximately one mile to the southwest; Elkhorn Golf Club, located approximately 1.5 miles to the southwest; Baxter Park, located approximately two miles to the southwest; Mick Grove Park, located approximately 2.25 miles to the east; Laughlin Park, located approximately 2.8 miles to the southwest; Harry Corren Park, located approximately 2.8 miles to the southwest; and Shumway Oak Grove Regional Park, located approximately three miles to the west.
Aesthetic Resources
There are no designated scenic vistas, State scenic highways, or County scenic routes within the Project area. The closest designated State scenic highway is State Route (SR) 160, located approximately 20 miles west of the Project site. The closest designated County scenic route is Isleton Road, located approximately 17 miles northwest of the Project site (Caltrans 2024). Additionally, the Project site is not located within or immediately adjacent to a Wild and Scenic River System (NWSRS 2024). The major scenic vistas in San Joaquin County are provided by the east-west travel corridors that provide views of the Sierra Nevada foothills and the Diablo Range. These visual resources within the County are also visible from Interstate (I-) 5 and I-580, the two major highways within the County. More “close-in” County scenic vistas include viewing lands under agricultural production, vineyards, and orchards. Views of major river corridors are most clearly visible from parklands that adjoin the rivers, as the motorist often catches only a quick glimpse of the river corridors while crossing bridges (County 2014).
Summary of Impacts from the Certified Stockton Delta Water Supply Project Program EIR Section 3.2, Land Use, Recreation, and Aesthetic Resources, of the certified DWSP Program EIR provided an analysis of potential impacts to land use, agriculture, recreation, and aesthetics. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP components could physically divide an established community; however, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be less than significant. It was concluded that construction of proposed DWSP facilities could reduce access to, or interfere with the use of, existing recreational facilities; however, no impact to these facilities was determined to occur from construction of the WTP. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities could conflict with existing agricultural uses by converting agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses; however, it was determined that the impact from construction of the WTP would be less than significant. The DWSP components could conflict with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect by converting agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the WTP and raw water pipeline appurtenant facilities would convert economically viable prime farmland and farmland of Statewide importance to nonagricultural use; therefore, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be significant and unavoidable. The proposed DWSP could conflict with zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant. Additionally, the proposed DWSP could involve other changes in the existing environment EXHIBIT 1
727
that, due to its location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of economically viable farmland, however the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP could indirectly increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility could occur or be accelerated, or include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which could have an adverse physical effect on the environment; however, it was determined that no impact would occur from the WTP. Operation of the DWSP intake could reduce access to, or interfere with the use of, existing recreational facilities; however, it was determined that no impact would occur from the WTP.
Lastly, the certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that implementation of the DWSP components would have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas, substantially damage scenic resources, or substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings; however, it was determined that the impact from the WTP would be less than significant. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP intake and WTP would create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect nighttime views in the area, and the impact was determined to be significant and unavoidable for the WTP. Although the DWSP Program EIR identified Mitigation Measure LU-11 to minimize the impact from outdoor light sources, the certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the impact from the WTP would remain significant and unavoidable, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted upon certification of the DWSP Program EIR.
Impact Analysis
The impact analysis questions related to land use, agriculture, recreation, and aesthetic resources are included in Table 3.2-1, Summary of Impacts – Land Use, Recreation, and Aesthetic Resources, in Section
3.2, Land Use, Recreation, and Aesthetic Resources, of the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-1: Construction of the proposed DWSP could physically divide an established community.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP components could physically divide an established community; however, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
The proposed Project would include the construction of three groundwater recharge basins and associated infrastructure located directly east of the City’s existing DWTP. The proposed Project is located immediately north of the City of Stockton in unincorporated San Joaquin County. The Project site is surrounded by agricultural fields and N. Lower Sacramento Road to the east, agricultural fields and single-family residential homes to the south, the DWTP and agricultural fields to the west, and agricultural fields to the north. Construction activities and staging of construction equipment for the proposed Project would be contained within the Project site. Construction of the proposed Project would not further separate these land uses or physically divide an established community, and no impact would occur. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-2: Construction of proposed DWSP facilities could reduce access to, or interfere with the use of, existing recreational facilities.
EXHIBIT 1
728
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of proposed DWSP facilities could reduce access to, or interfere with the use of, existing recreational facilities; however, no impact to these facilities was determined to occur from construction of the WTP.
The proposed Project would be constructed immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP, and within the WTP site evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR, in a primarily rural area of the County. There are no existing recreational facilities in the immediate Project vicinity. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not interfere with the use of existing recreational facilities, no impact would occur, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-3: Construction of DWSP facilities could conflict with existing agricultural uses.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities would conflict with existing agricultural uses; however, with implementation of mitigation, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
The proposed Project would be located adjacent to the City’s existing DWTP and is located on primarily undeveloped land that is not currently used for agricultural uses. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with existing agricultural uses, and no impact would occur. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-4: The DWSP could conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP components could conflict with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect by converting agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
The proposed Project would construct three groundwater recharge basins directly east of the City’s existing DWTP. The Project site is in a primarily rural area of the County and is surrounded by agricultural fields and N. Lower Sacramento Road to the east, agricultural fields and single-family residential homes to the south, the DWTP and agricultural fields to the west, and agricultural fields to the north. As discussed above in Impact LU-3, although the Project is surrounded by land in agricultural production, the proposed Project would not conflict with existing agricultural uses. The location of the proposed Project is due to the unique site area requirements, as surface water would be delivered to the forebays and then the groundwater recharge basins by tapping into the existing raw water supply pipeline at the DWTP facility. The proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU-7.2, Agricultural Support Uses, of the Community Development Element of the County General Plan, which states:
The County shall require new agricultural support development and non-farm activities to be compatible with surrounding agricultural operations. New developments shall be required to demonstrate that they are located in an agricultural area because of unique site area EXHIBIT 1
729
requirements, operational characteristics, resource orientation, or because it is providing a service to the surrounding agricultural area. The operational characteristics of the use may not have a detrimental impact on the operation or use of surrounding agricultural properties.
Developments must be sited to avoid any disruption to the surrounding agricultural operations. (County 2016).
Additionally, the proposed Project would service the surrounding agricultural area, as the Project would increase groundwater recharge. The proposed Project would not conflict with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and the impact would be less than significant. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-5: Construction of the DWSP WTP and the raw water pipeline appurtenant facilities would convert economically viable prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance to non-agricultural use.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP WTP and raw water pipeline appurtenance facilities would convert economically viable Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use, and the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be significant and unavoidable even with incorporation of Mitigation Measures LU-5a and LU-5b.
Mitigation Measures LU-5a and LU-5b, would not be applicable to the proposed Project, as the Project site does not currently support agricultural production. Additionally, according to the DOC’s FMMP California Important Farmland Finder Interactive Map, the undeveloped eastern portion of the Project site is classified as Farmland of Local Importance and the western portion of the Project site is classified as Urban and Built-Up Land. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not convert viable Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use, the impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be necessary. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impact would occur compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-6: The proposed DWSP could conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP components could conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract; however, the impact from implementation of the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
The proposed Project site is located in unincorporated San Joaquin County and is currently zoned AG-40, which implements the A/G land use designation of the County General Plan, and the parcels are not currently under a Williamson Act contract. Chapter 9-203 of the County Development Title prescribes land use regulations for agricultural zones. However, pursuant to Government Code Section 53091(e), the location or construction of facilities for the production, generation, storage, treatment, or transmission of water by a special district are not subject to the zoning ordinance of the County in which the Project would be located. Although the proposed Project is not required to comply with the San Joaquin County Zoning Ordinance, it is the Project’s intent to enhance groundwater recharge, thereby sustaining agriculture. The implementation of the proposed groundwater recharge basins would promote groundwater security, inherently protecting agricultural resources in the County. The proposed EXHIBIT 1
730
Project would not conflict with the existing zoning for agricultural use, and the impact would be less than significant. There would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-7: The proposed DWSP could involve other changes in the existing environment that, due to its location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of economically viable farmland.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP components could involve other changes in the existing environment that, due to its location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of economically viable farmland; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
As discussed above in Impact LU-5, the proposed Project would be constructed immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP. The undeveloped eastern portion of the Project site is classified as Farmland of Local Importance and the western portion of the Project site is classified as Urban and Built-Up Land; the Project site is not classified as economically viable Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the loss of economically viable farmland. The impact would be less than significant, and no new or substantially more severe impact would occur compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-8: The proposed DWSP could indirectly: (a) increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility could occur or be accelerated; or (b) include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which could have an adverse physical effect on the environment.
No New Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the WTP would not increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility could occur or be accelerated, nor include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which could have an adverse physical effect on the environment; therefore, it was determined that no impact would occur.
The proposed Project would include construction of three groundwater recharge basins located directly east of the City’s DWTP. The proposed Project would not result in substantial population growth within or near the Project vicinity and thus would not increase the demand for additional recreational facilities, nor otherwise promote or indirectly induce new development that would require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Further, the Project does not include the construction of recreational facilities which could have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Therefore, the proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility could occur or be accelerated, nor include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which could have an adverse physical effect on the environment, and no impact would occur. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-9: Operation of the DWSP intake could reduce access to, or interfere with the use of, existing recreational facilities.
EXHIBIT 1
731
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the operation of the DWSP intake could reduce access to or interfere with the use of existing recreational facilities; however, it was determined that no impact would occur from operation of the WTP.
As previously discussed in Impact LU-2, there are no existing recreational facilities in the immediate Project vicinity. Operation of the proposed Project would not interfere with the use of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-10: The DWSP intake and WTP would have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas, substantially damage scenic resources, or substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the WTP would have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas, substantially damage scenic resources, or substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. The impact from implementation of the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
The Project site consists of primarily undeveloped land adjacent to the City’s existing DWTP. The topography of the Project site is relatively flat with an elevation that ranges between approximately 18 to 30 feet amsl, similar to that of the surrounding areas. The Project site is surrounded by agricultural fields and N. Lower Sacramento Road to the east, agricultural fields and scattered single-family residential homes to the south, the DWTP and agricultural fields to the west, and agricultural fields to the north. The northern, eastern, and western edges of the Project site are currently fenced. The Project site is located in a generally rural area of the County, and publicly accessible areas with views of the site would include N. Lower Sacramento Road. As such, viewer sensitivity to the visual character or quality of the Project site would generally consist of motorists along N. Lower Sacramento Road.
The closest designated State Scenic Highway is SR 160, located approximately 20 miles west of the Project site. The closest designated County scenic route is Isleton Road, located approximately 17 miles northwest of the Project site (Caltrans 2024). Therefore, due to the distance from SR 160 and Isleton Road, the proposed Project would not damage scenic resources within a State scenic highway or County scenic route. A scenic vista is defined as a viewpoint that provides an expansive view of a highly valued landscape for the benefit of the general public. The major scenic vistas in the County include views of the Sierra Nevada foothills, Diablo Range, and viewing lands under agricultural production, vineyards, and orchards.
The proposed Project would be constructed on undeveloped land adjacent to the City’s DWTP. The proposed temporary stockpile areas would encompass approximately 14 acres of the Project site. The stockpiling areas and staging of construction equipment would temporarily alter the visual character of the site and surrounding areas; however, the stockpile and staging areas would be located in previously disturbed areas setback over 1,700 feet from N. Lower Sacramento Road and used short-term during Project construction. As such, construction of the proposed Project would not adversely affect scenic vistas.
The proposed groundwater basins, shaded viewing platform, parking lot, and associated infrastructure would encompass approximately 64-acres of the Project site adjacent to the City’s existing DWTP. Each groundwater recharge basin would be excavated to about three feet below existing grade and the surrounding perimeter roads/berms would be built up approximately five feet above existing grade. The EXHIBIT 1
732
height of the elevated viewing platform would be approximately 20 feet from existing grade. Wrought iron fencing would replace the existing fencing along N. Lower Sacramento Road and the northern boundary of the Project site. Chain link or similar fencing would be installed along the southern boundary of the Project site and on the western boundary of the northern groundwater recharge basin.
However, as N. Lower Sacramento Road is currently lined with tall vertical features (e.g., mature trees, utility poles, streetlights, and roadway signs) and horizontal features (e.g., building and pavement edges, fences, and utility lines), the proposed fencing would be consistent with the vertical and horizontal features within the Project area. Therefore, Mitigation Measure LU-10 identified in the certified DWSP Program EIR, which require avoiding the use of bright reflective materials and colors to reduce the visual impact of the proposed viewing platform and associated aboveground infrastructure, would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented. For these reasons, the proposed Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure LU-10, and no new or substantially more severe impact would occur compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact LU-11: The DWSP intake and WTP would create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect nighttime views in the area.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the WTP would create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect nighttime views in the area, and the impact was determined to be significant and unavoidable with implementation of Mitigation Measure LU-11.
The proposed Project would be located adjacent to the existing DWTP, which currently has nighttime lighting for safety and security purposes. Any lighting associated with the proposed Project would be similar to the existing DWTP’s lighting and would adhere to Mitigation Measure LU-11, which would require the shielding and angling of outdoor light sources to prevent light trespass on adjacent properties. Therefore, the impact would not be substantially more severe than what was analyzed in the certified DWSP Program EIR with implementation of Mitigation Measure LU-11, and no new or substantially more severe impact would occur.
Mitigation Measures
The certified DWSP Program EIR identified Mitigation Measures LU-5a, LU-5b, LU-10, and LU-11 to mitigate impacts related to land use, agriculture, recreation, and aesthetics from implementation of the WTP. However, Mitigation Measures LU-5a and LU-5b would not be applicable to the proposed Project, as the Project site does not currently support agricultural production and is not designated prime farmland or farmland of Statewide importance.
As described above, Mitigation Measures LU-10 and LU-11 from the certified DWSP Program EIR would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented. These mitigation measures are provided below.
Mitigation Measure LU-10: The design of the intake facility and WTP, including the choice of color and materials, shall seek to reduce the visual impact of the facilities. Bright reflective materials and colors shall be avoided.
EXHIBIT 1
733
Mitigation Measure LU-11: Outdoor light sources shall be properly shielded and installed to prevent light trespass on adjacent properties. Any flood or spot lamps installed for purposes other than waterway navigation must be aimed no higher than 45 degrees above straight down (halfway between straight down and straight to the side) when the source is visible from any off-site residential property or public roadway.
EXHIBIT 1
734
II. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
New or
Substantially More
Severe Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
Impact Analysis Questions
(Table 3.3-3 of the certified
DWSP Program EIR):
GEO-1: Construction of the
proposed DWSP could lead to
accelerated soil erosion and
possible sedimentation of local
surface waters.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
GEO-2: In the event of seismic
activity strong ground motion,
secondary hazards in the form
of settlement, and/or
associated ground failure (e.g.,
liquefaction) could possibly
impact DWSP facilities.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
GEO-3: Structural
improvements associated with
the proposed DWSP could be
subject to soil-related hazards
including expansive and/or
corrosive soil materials or
settlement.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
GEO-4: DWSP facilities,
including pipelines, intake
facility, sub-surface
foundations, and other
underground utilities, would be
subjected to hazards associated
with regional subsidence.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Affected Environment
Geologic Setting
San Joaquin County is located in the central portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province of California. This geomorphic province is characterized as a northwestward-trending trough that formed between the Coast Range Mountains to the west and the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the east. The Great Valley is about 50 miles wide and extends for 400 miles through the center of California. The northern and southern portions of the Great Valley are referred to as the Sacramento Valley and San Joaquin Valley, respectively; with the Sacramento River draining areas to the north and the San Joaquin River draining areas to the south. The topography of the Project site is generally flat, with an elevation that ranges between approximately 18 to 30 feet amsl.
EXHIBIT 1
735
The Project area is generally underlain by Quaternary-aged sedimentary rocks and portions of the Modesto Formation. The Modesto Formation is an alluvial fan deposit that generally ranges in thickness from 150 to 200 feet, and consists of discontinuous clay and silt lenses, interbedded with fine and coarse sand deposits derived from the Sierra Nevada.
Soils
Erosion is the wearing away of soil and rock by processes such as mechanical or chemical weathering, mass wasting, and the action of waves, wind, and underground water. Excessive soil erosion can eventually lead to damage to building foundations and roadways. Areas that are susceptible to erosion are often those that become exposed during the construction phase of development when existing cover is removed, or earthwork activities disturb sub-grade areas (County 2014).
Settlement can occur from immediate settlement, consolidation, shrinkage of expansive soil, and liquefaction. Soils tend to settle at different rates and by varying amounts depending on the load weight or changes in properties over an area, which is referred to as differential settlement. Subsidence can result in reduced storage capacity of groundwater aquifers. Subsidence within the County is usually the result of pumping groundwater or oxidation of peat in the Delta (County 2014).
The Feasibility Study Report prepared in December 2023 for the proposed Project included an evaluation of the ability for soils on the Project site to transmit water downward. Four soil borings were conducted on the Project site to assess infiltration rates. According to the report, the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) soil classifications found within the four borings included SM (silty sand), SW (well-graded sand, fine to coarse sand), SC (clayey sand), SP (poorly graded sand), and CL (lean clay).
It was concluded that these soils beneath the proposed groundwater recharge area appear to be suitable for groundwater recharge. However, surface soils down to 15 feet have lower permeabilities that could limit the ability to maximize the amount of water that can be recharged annually. The report found that improved permeability occurs below 20 feet bgs.
Expansive soils are characterized by their potential “shrink-swell” behavior. Shrink-swell is the cyclic change in volume (expansion and contraction) that occurs in certain fine-grained clay sediments from the process of wetting and drying. Clay minerals such as smectite, bentonite, montmorillonite, beidellite, vermiculite and others are known to expand with changes in moisture content. According to the soil survey data for San Joaquin County, close to half of the upper five feet of soils throughout the County have a low shrink-swell potential, a lesser portion is considered to have a moderate potential, and about an eighth of the area (primarily in the southwestern end of the County) has been mapped with a high potential (County 2014).
Seismicity
The nearest faults to the Project area exhibiting historic displacement (activity within the last 200 years) are the Concord-Green Valley, Hayward, and Marsh Creek-Greenville faults, located approximately 25 to 46 miles west of the Project area. Portions of the Calaveras fault zone that are considered active within the last 200 years are located approximately 45 miles west of the Project area. Other active faults within 100 miles include the Dunnigan Hills (58 miles north), Ortigalita (62 miles west), Healdsburg-Rodgers Creek (64 miles west), West Napa (47 miles west), and San Andreas (65 miles west) fault zones.
According to the California DOC Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Map (EQ Zapp), the Project is within an unevaluated area and is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, Liquefaction Zone, or Landslide Zone (DOC 2024b).
EXHIBIT 1
736
Mineral Resources
The California Geological Survey (CGS) classifies the regional significance of mineral resources in accordance with the California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975. Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ) have been designated to indicate the significance of mineral deposits. The MRZ categories are as follows:
• MRZ-1: Areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. • MRZ-2: Areas where adequate information indicates significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that a high likelihood exists for their presence. • MRZ-3: Areas containing mineral deposits the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data.
• MRZ-4: Areas where available information is inadequate for assignment to any other MRZ.
The primary extractive resources in San Joaquin County are sand and gravel aggregate. Peat soil, placer gold, and silver are extracted to a much lesser extent. Mining activities are monitored by the State Office of Mining Reclamation (OMR) and the County Public Works Department to ensure compliance with applicable laws, to promote reclamation that is cost-effective and beneficial to end-uses, and to protect public health and safety (County 2014). The Project site is not within a mapped MRZ (DOC 2024c), nor is the Project site within or adjacent to any active mining operations (DOC 2024d).
Summary of Impacts from the certified Stockton Delta Water Supply Project Program EIR Geology, soils, and seismicity impacts are discussed in Section 3.3, Geology, Soils, and Seismicity, of the certified DWSP Program EIR. The document concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities could lead to accelerated soil erosion and possible sedimentation of local surface waters; however, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1. The certified DWSP Program EIR also concluded that in the event of seismic activity, strong ground motion, secondary hazards in the form of settlement, and/or associated ground failure (e.g., liquefaction) could possibly impact the DWSP facilities; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-2a through GEO-2c. Structural improvements associated with the DWSP could be subject to soil-related hazards including expansive and/or corrosive soil materials or settlement; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-3a and GEO-3b. Lastly, the certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP facilities, including pipelines, intake facility, sub-surface foundations, and other underground utilities, would be subjected to hazards associated with regional subsidence; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
The certified DWSP Program EIR also concluded that no mineral resource extraction areas were identified within the DWSP Project area in the City of Stockton, City of Lodi, or County general plans. As a result, construction and operation of the DWSP components would neither interfere with any existing extraction operations nor reduce the availability of an MRZ-2 classified resource. For these reasons, the potential impacts on mineral resources were not discussed further in the certified DWSP Program EIR and are not analyzed in this IS/Addendum.
EXHIBIT 1
737
Impact Analysis
The impact analysis questions related to geology, soils, and seismicity are included in Table 3.3-3, Summary of Impacts – Geology, Soils, and Seismicity, in Section 3.3, Geology, Soils, and Seismicity, of the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact GEO-1: Construction of the proposed DWSP could lead to accelerated soil erosion and possible sedimentation of local surface waters.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities could lead to accelerated soil erosion and possible sedimentation of local surface waters; however, impacts from construction of the WTP were determined to be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1.
The proposed Project would include construction of three groundwater recharge basins with associated infrastructure, a visitor restroom, a shaded viewing platform, and a paved parking lot. Construction of the proposed Project would require surface disturbance including grading, excavation, and vegetation removal, which would expose soils on the Project site to potential erosion from wind and rain. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, potential short-term impacts from construction would be addressed through conformance with applicable elements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction General Permit, including preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to reduce on-site erosion of disturbed soil. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, and the impact would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1. There would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact GEO-2: In the event of seismic activity strong ground motion, secondary hazards in the form of settlement, and/or associated ground failure (e.g., liquefaction) could possibly impact DWSP facilities.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that in the event of seismic activity, strong ground motion, secondary hazards in the form of settlement, and/or associated ground failure (e.g., liquefaction) could possibly impact the WTP; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be reduced to a less than significant impact with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-2b and GEO-2c.
The proposed Project would be located in unincorporated San Joaquin County at the City’s DWTP.
Terrain in the Project site is relatively flat with an elevation that ranges between approximately 18 to 30 feet amsl. The Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, and there are no known faults in the Project site or the near vicinity. The nearest faults to the Project area exhibiting historic displacement (activity within the last 200 years) are the Concord-Green Valley, Hayward, and Marsh Creek-Greenville faults, located approximately 25 to 46 miles west of the Project area. Seismic activity and strong ground motion in the Project area are unlikely to occur.
As there are no known earthquake faults on or near the Project site, secondary hazards in the form of settlement and/or associated ground failure such as liquefaction would also be unlikely to occur.
However, construction of the proposed groundwater recharge basins and associated infrastructure would be required to follow standard guidance from a geotechnical engineer and State construction requirements to reduce potential hazards resulting from strong seismic ground shaking. Further, EXHIBIT 1
738
Mitigation Measure GEO-2b as identified in the certified DWSP Program EIR would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented, which would require the proposed Project to be designed to comply with the site-specific design recommendations as provided by a licensed geotechnical or civil engineer. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2b identified in the certified DWSP Program EIR, impacts related to seismic activity would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impact would occur compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact GEO-3: Structural improvements associated with the proposed DWSP could be subject to soil- related hazards including expansive and/or corrosive soil materials or settlement.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that structural improvements associated with the proposed DWSP could be subject to soil-related hazards including expansive and/or corrosive soil materials or settlement; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-3a and GEO-3b. Expansive soils are characterized by their potential “shrink-swell” behavior. Shrink-swell is the cyclic change in volume (expansion and contraction) that occurs in certain fine-grained clay sediments from the process of wetting and drying. Clay minerals such as smectite, bentonite, montmorillonite, beidellite, vermiculite and others are known to expand with changes in moisture content. The effects of expansive soil materials would result in cracking, settlement, and uplift of foundations of aboveground structures, paved service roads, and concrete slabs. Settlement of fill material would occur from static loads with possibly half of the settlement taking place during construction or shortly thereafter.
Differential settlement would also occur due to variability in the underlying soil materials.
The proposed Project would include the construction of three groundwater recharge basins with associated infrastructure, a visitor restroom, a shaded viewing platform, and a paved parking lot. Waste from the visitor restroom would be treated on-site via a new septic tank (if connection to existing utilities is not feasible). Standard engineering practices generally require the removal and replacement of expansive soil materials with non-expansive engineered fill that would prevent the impact of pressure or settlement. Additionally, Mitigation Measure GEO-3a and GEO-3b from the certified DWSP Program EIR would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented, which would require the installation of a cathodic protection system for all underground metallic fittings, appurtenances, and piping to prevent corrosion, and would require the use of isolation valves to prevent significant losses of surface water in the event of pipeline rupture. Therefore, the impacts to soil-related hazards including expansive and/or corrosive soil materials or settlement would be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-3a and GEO-3b, and no new or substantially more severe impact would occur compared to what was previously evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact GEO-4: DWSP facilities, including pipelines, intake facility, sub-surface foundations, and other underground utilities, would be subjected to hazards associated with regional subsidence.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP facilities, including pipelines, intake facility, sub-surface foundations, and other underground utilities, would be subjected to hazards associated with regional subsidence; however, it was concluded that the WTP is not located within an area identified as experiencing significant subsidence, and the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant.
EXHIBIT 1
739
The proposed Project would be located immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP and within the WTP site as evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR. Therefore, the proposed Project would not be located within an area identified as experiencing significant subsidence. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant, and no new or substantially more severe impact would occur compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Mitigation Measures
As discussed in the sections below, the certified DWSP Program EIR identified Mitigation Measures GEO- 1, GEO-2b, GEO-2c, GEO-3a, and GEO-3b to mitigate impacts related to geology, soils, and seismicity from implementation of the WTP. These mitigation measures would remain applicable to the proposed Project. However, Mitigation Measure GEO-2c, which required the City to prepare an Earthquake Response Plan and evacuation plans for all personnel-occupied structures, would not be required for the proposed Project because the proposed Project would not construct new personnel-occupied structures.
Mitigation Measure GEO-1: The City shall prepare a SWPPP for all construction phases of the proposed Project, as required by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB). The objectives of the SWPPP are to identify pollutant sources that may affect the quality of stormwater discharge and to implement BMPs to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharges. BMPs may include, but would not be limited to:
• Excavation and grading activities in areas with steep slopes or directly adjacent to open water shall be scheduled for the dry season only (April 15 to October 15), to the extent possible. This will reduce the chance of severe erosion from intense rainfall and surface runoff. • If excavation occurs during the rainy season, storm runoff from the construction area shall be regulated through a stormwater management/erosion control plan that shall include temporary on-site silt traps and/or basins with multiple discharge points to natural drainages and energy dissipaters. Stockpiles of loose material shall be covered and runoff diverted away from exposed soil material. If work stops due to rain, a positive grading away from slopes shall be provided to carry the surface runoff to areas where flow would be controlled, such as the temporary silt basins. Sediment basins/traps shall be located and operated to minimize the amount of off-site sediment transport. Any trapped sediment shall be removed from the basin or trap and placed at a suitable location on-site, away from concentrated flows, or removed to an approved disposal site.
• Temporary erosion control measures shall be provided until perennial revegetation or landscaping is established and can minimize discharge of sediment into nearby waterways. For construction within 500 feet of a water body, appropriate erosion control measures shall be placed upstream adjacent to the water body.
• Erosion protection shall be provided on all cut-and-fill slopes. Revegetation shall be facilitated by mulching, hydroseeding, or other methods and shall be initiated as soon as possible after completion of grading and prior to the onset of the rainy season (by October 15). • BMPs selected and implemented for the Project shall be in place and operational prior to the onset of major earthwork on the site. The construction phase facilities shall be maintained EXHIBIT 1
740
regularly and cleared of accumulated sediment as necessary. Effective mechanical and structural BMPs that would be implemented at the Project site include the following:
o Mechanical stormwater filtration measures, including oil and sediment separators or absorbent filter systems such as the Stormceptor® system, can be installed within the storm drainage system to provide filtration of stormwater prior to discharge. o Vegetative strips, high infiltration substrates, and grassy swales can be used where feasible throughout the development to reduce runoff and provide initial stormwater treatment.
o Roof drains shall discharge to natural surfaces or swales where possible to avoid excessive concentration and channelization of stormwater. o Permanent energy dissipaters can be included for drainage outlets. o The water quality detention basins are designed to provide effective water quality control measures including the following:
Maximize detention time for settling of fine particles; Establish maintenance schedules for periodic removal of sedimentation, excessive vegetation, and debris that may clog basin inlets and outlets; Maximize the detention basin elevation to allow the highest amount of infiltration and settling prior to discharge.
• Hazardous materials such as fuels and solvents used on the construction-sites shall be stored in covered containers and protected from rainfall, runoff, vandalism, and accidental release to the environment. All stored fuels and solvents will be contained in an area of impervious surface with containment capacity equal to the volume of materials stored. A stockpile of spill cleanup materials shall be readily available at all construction-sites. Employees shall be trained in spill prevention and cleanup, and individuals shall be designated as responsible for prevention and cleanup activities.
• Equipment shall be properly maintained in designated areas with runoff and erosion control measures to minimize accidental release of pollutants. The SWPPP also will specify measures for removing sediment from water pumped for trench dewatering before the water is released to waterways.
Mitigation Measure GEO-2b: Facility design for all DWSP facilities will comply with the site-specific design recommendations as provided by a licensed geotechnical or civil engineer. These recommendations will be based on the anticipated peak ground acceleration (PGA) for each Project- component within the overall Project area. In instances where conflicting PGA values are obtained, the City will apply the greater of the two values to ensure maximum structural integrity. Design recommendations provided in the geotechnical report will demonstrate compliance with 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) and 2001 California Building Code (CBC) requirements for structures located in seismic zone 3.
EXHIBIT 1
741
Mitigation Measure GEO-3a: The City shall install a cathodic protection system for all underground metallic fittings, appurtenances, and piping to protect these facilities from corrosion. The cathodic protection system shall be designed consistent with City standards.
Mitigation Measure GEO-3b: Isolation valves will be incorporated into all pipelines to prevent significant losses of surface water in the event of pipeline rupture. The specifications of the isolation valves will conform to the UBC, American Water Works Association (AWWA), and City standards.
EXHIBIT 1
742
III. DRAINAGE AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
Impact Analysis Questions (Table
3.4-1 of the certified DWSP
Program EIR):
DFM-1: Dewatering of excavated
areas during construction in areas
of shallow groundwater could affect
surface water quality.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
DFM-2: DWSP construction
activities could result in increased
erosion and sedimentation, or
release fuels or other hazardous
materials associated with
construction equipment that could
impact surface water quality.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
DFM-3: DWSP intake and WTP
facilities would increase the amount
of impervious surfaces, which in
turn would increase local storm
runoff volumes that could exceed
the capacity of on-site drainage
systems, and create localized
flooding or contribute to a
cumulative flooding impact
downstream.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
DFM-4: Removal and stockpiling of
tunnel spoils during construction of
the raw and treated water pipelines
could release chemicals or spoils
into the surrounding environment
that could affect surface water
quality.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
DFM-5: Construction of the intake
facility and raw water pipelines
could potentially increase the risk of
flooding on Empire Tract and King
Island.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Affected Environment
The Central Valley is a very large, flat alluvial valley that dominates the central portion of California. The valley stretches approximately 500 miles from north to south, from about 100 miles south of the Oregon border to the boundary between Kern and Los Angeles counties. The Central Valley is divided into three EXHIBIT 1
743
hydrologic regions or surface water basins including the Sacramento River Basin in the north, San Joaquin River Basin in the center, and Tulare Lake Basin to the very south. Together, the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins cover about one fourth of the total areas of the State and over 30 percent of the irrigable land. The two main drainages for these valleys, the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River, empty into the San Francisco Bay estuary system through a large expanse of interconnected canals, streambeds, sloughs, marshes and peat islands known as the Delta (County 2014).
The County lies entirely within the San Joaquin River Basin, which is bounded topographically and geologically by the bedrock of the Diablo Range on the west and the Sierra Nevada to the east. The San Joaquin River flows in a southeast to northwest direction from the Sierra Nevada through the County into the Delta, San Francisco Bay, and ultimately the Pacific Ocean. Both the headwaters and ultimate destination of the San Joaquin River and its tributaries are outside of the county. Four major rivers and streams drain from the western slope of the Sierra Nevada traversing or bordering the County, including Calaveras River, Mokelumne River, Stanislaus River, and San Joaquin River (County 2014).
The Delta occupies the western portion of San Joaquin County and represents the point of discharge for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River systems. Water flows out of the Delta, into San Francisco Bay, and through the Golden Gate to the Pacific Ocean, creating an extensive estuary where salty ocean water and fresh river water commingle. In sum, water from over 40 percent of the State’s land area is discharged into the Delta. The Delta supports several beneficial uses, including water supply to local municipalities and agricultural uses, ecological support for fisheries including wetlands and important habitat, in-Delta agriculture, flood management, water quality management, and a major conveyance for transporting fresh water from northern to southern portions of the state. Within the San Joaquin County portion of the Delta, three irrigation districts provide irrigation water from Delta channels to farms within the Delta (County 2014).
In general, surface water quality depends on seasonal hydrologic patterns, mineral composition of watershed soils, topography, land use, and sources of contamination. During low-flow conditions of the summer months, the surface water quality characteristics of most importance to aquatic life are temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous, algae growth, and other toxic constituents including ammonia, pesticides, and residual chlorine. Higher flow conditions in the winter are influenced more by stormwater runoff and associated pollutants such as sediment (turbidity), petroleum hydrocarbons, nutrients and bacteria from livestock areas and agricultural fields, heavy metals, pesticides, and various other pollutants (County 2014).
According to the Interactive Flood Zone Map for San Joaquin County, the proposed Project would be located within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone “X”, which indicates an area of minimal to moderate flood risk hazard (0.2 percent annual chance of flood hazard; County 2024b). The nearest inundation zone is located approximately 6 miles north of the Project site and is associated with the New Woodbridge Diversion (DWR 2024b).
Water supply sources for the proposed groundwater recharge basins would include water from the Delta, WID, and/or the MICUP during surplus. As mentioned in Section 4.2, Water Supply, the City currently has about 21,000 AF/year of raw water of existing surface water supplies from these sources available for recharge (NEXGEN 2024). The WID has the authority to divert water from the Mokelumne River (Lodi Lake) via the main diversion canal in Woodbridge, which runs underneath Lower Sacramento Road and feeds the majority of the canals to the south.
EXHIBIT 1
744
Summary of Impacts from the certified Stockton Delta Water Supply Project Program EIR Drainage and floodplain impacts are discussed in Section 3.4, Drainage and Floodplain Management, of the certified DWSP Program EIR. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that dewatering of excavated areas during construction in areas of shallow groundwater could result in adverse impacts to surface water quality, but the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure DFM-1. Additionally, construction of the DWSP facilities could result in increased erosion and sedimentation, or release fuels or other hazardous materials associated with construction equipment that could impact surface water quality; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP intake and WTP would increase the amount of impervious surfaces, which in turn would increase local storm runoff volumes that could exceed the capacity of on-site drainage systems and create localized flooding or contribute to a cumulative flooding impact downstream; however, the impact from the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure DFM-3. Removal and stockpiling of tunnel spoils during construction of the raw and treated water pipelines could release chemicals or spoils into the surrounding environment that could affect surface water quality; however, it was determined that no impact would occur from construction of the WTP. Lastly, construction of the intake facility and raw water pipelines could potentially increase the risk of flooding on Empire Tract and King Island; however, the impact was determined to be less than significant from the WTP.
Impact Analysis
The impact analysis questions related to drainage and floodplain management are included in Table 3.4- 1, Summary of Impacts – Hydrology, Flooding, and Water Quality, in Section 3.4, Drainage and Floodplain Management, of the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact DFM-1: Dewatering of excavated areas during construction in areas of shallow groundwater could affect surface water quality.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that dewatering of excavated areas during construction in areas of shallow groundwater could result in adverse impacts to surface water quality, however the impact from the WTP was determined to be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure DFM-1.
The proposed Project would be constructed immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP and would include the construction of three groundwater recharge basins totaling approximately 45.5 acres. The proposed groundwater recharge basins would be excavated to approximately three feet bgs and would require approximately 212,860 CY of cut. It is anticipated that if shallow groundwater is encountered during construction, dewatering of the shallow groundwater would be required. If chemicals are present or sediment is released into the extracted water, discharge of this groundwater into surface water would affect surface water quality. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure DFM-1, as required in the certified DWSP Program EIR, would ensure that in the event that dewatered groundwater cannot be contained on-site, the City shall pump the water into multiple-gallon Baker tanks or approved equivalent with either a filter or gel coagulant system or other containment to remove sediment. Therefore, the impact would be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure DFM-1, and no new or substantially more severe impact would occur.
EXHIBIT 1
745
Impact DFM-2: DWSP construction activities could result in increased erosion and sedimentation, or release fuels or other hazardous materials associated with construction equipment that could impact surface water quality.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities could result in increased erosion and sedimentation, or release fuels or other hazardous materials associated with construction equipment that could impact surface water quality; however, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1.
The proposed Project would include the construction of three groundwater recharge basins totaling approximately 45.5 acres, which would be excavated to approximately three feet bgs and would require approximately 212,860 CY of cut. Excavated soil would be temporarily stored in the proposed stockpile areas, which would encompass approximately 14 acres of the Project site. Ground disturbing activities during Project construction and temporary soil stockpiling could result in exposure of soils to runoff, which would cause erosion and transportation of soil particles that, once in surface water runoff, could cause sediment and other pollutants to leave the construction-site and affect the water quality of the San Joaquin River and/or other surface water in the Project area. Hazardous materials associated with construction equipment and practices, such as fuels, oils, antifreeze, coolants, and other substances, could adversely affect water quality if released to groundwater or surface water. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would require the City to prepare a SWPPP for all construction phases of the proposed Project, as required by the CVRWQCB, which would identify pollutant sources that may affect the quality of stormwater discharge and to implement BMPs to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharges during construction. Therefore, the construction-related impact would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, and no new or substantially more severe impact would occur.
Impact DFM-3: DWSP intake and WTP facilities would increase the amount of impervious surfaces, which in turn would increase local storm runoff volumes that could exceed the capacity of on-site drainage systems, and create localized flooding or contribute to a cumulative flooding impact downstream.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP intake and WTP would increase the amount of impervious surfaces, which in turn would increase local storm runoff volumes that could exceed the capacity of on-site drainage systems and create localized flooding or contribute to a cumulative flooding impact downstream; however, the impact from construction and operation of the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure DFM-3.
Development of the proposed Project would include the construction of three groundwater recharge basins with associated infrastructure, a visitor restroom, a shaded viewing platform, and a paved parking lot. Increases in impervious surfaces and the resulting increases of surface water runoff volumes and rates can produce considerable changes to downstream hydrology in areas where portions of the drainage system are converted from pervious to impervious surfaces; however, the proposed Project would add minimal impervious surfaces and would also construct infiltration wells within each groundwater recharge basin to increase groundwater recharge. Mitigation Measure DFM-3 would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would require the City to comply with all measures of the 2020 Stormwater Quality Control Criteria Plan (SWQCCP), which is a joint plan between the City of EXHIBIT 1
746
Stockton and San Joaquin County. The 2020 SWQCCP, most recently revised in 2023, is an update to the 2009 SWQCCP and reflects the most recent Phase I municipal stormwater NPDES permit requirements and new Statewide trash control requirements (City of Stockton and San Joaquin County 2020).
Additionally, as discussed above in Impact DFM-2, with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, potential short-term impacts from construction would be addressed through conformance with applicable elements of the NPDES Construction General Permit, including implementation of a SWPPP.
The SWPPP would implement BMPs during construction to reduce on-site erosion of disturbed soil.
Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1 and Mitigation Measure DFM-3, implementation of the proposed Project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, and the impact would be less than significant. There would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact DFM-4: Removal and stockpiling of trench and tunnel spoils during construction of the raw and treated water pipelines could release chemicals or spoils into the surrounding environment that could affect surface water quality.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that removal and stockpiling of tunnel spoils during construction of the raw and treated water pipelines could release chemicals or spoils into the surrounding environment that could affect surface water quality. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the raw and treated water pipelines would occur primarily by open trench construction adjacent to existing roadways. These trench and tunnel spoils or materials, removed from the subsurface as pipe is installed, would contain lubrication and hydraulic chemicals, very fine sediments, and would have a high water content. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that some components of the DWSP would release of these spoils into surface water runoff or soils in adjacent agricultural fields would cause potential adverse effects on surface water quality and soil productivity; however, the certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the WTP would not result in impacts to surface water quality or soil productivity on adjacent lands.
The proposed Project would temporarily stockpile debris and vegetation from site preparation and soil from basin excavation on-site. The proposed temporary stockpile areas would be located west of the groundwater recharge basins and adjacent to the City’s DWTP and would encompass approximately 14 acres of the Project site. Following excavation and temporary stockpiling, the excavated soils would be used on-site to construct the perimeter berms for the proposed basins, and remaining soil (if any) would be balanced on-site. Implementation of standard BMPs, such as installation of straw wattles around the perimeter of the stockpiled soil, would minimize the potential for soil erosion. Further, the proposed Project would not require the construction of new raw and/or treated water pipelines off-site or adjacent to existing roadways which could contain lubrication and hydraulic chemicals. Therefore, the proposed Project would not release chemicals or soils into the surrounding environment that could affect water quality. No impact would occur, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact DFM-5: Construction of the intake facility and raw water pipelines could potentially increase the risk of flooding on Empire Tract and King Island.
EXHIBIT 1
747
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the intake facility and raw water pipelines could potentially increase the risk of flooding on Empire Tract and King Island; however, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be less than significant. The certified DWSP Program EIR contemplated that both the in-river intake and the in-bank intake would be constructed on the river side of the existing levee. The in-bank intake would be constructed into the levee; the raw water pipelines would pass through or under the levee.
Construction crews and equipment would require access to and over the levee into the river channel.
The proposed Project would be constructed immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP and would not require the construction of any Project components within the immediate vicinity of the river channel.
Therefore, the proposed Project would not increase the risk of flooding on Empire Tract and King Island.
No impact would occur, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Mitigation Measures
The certified DWSP Program EIR identified Mitigation Measures DFM-1, DFM-3, and GEO-1 to mitigate impacts related to drainage and floodplain management from implementation of the WTP. As described in the impact analyses above, all mitigation measures identified for the WTP related to drainage and floodplain management would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented.
These mitigation measures are provided below. See Section 6.II, Geology, Soils, and Seismicity, for Mitigation Measure GEO-1.
Mitigation Measure DFM-1: During construction, if groundwater cannot be contained on-site, the City shall pump the water into multiple-gallon Baker tanks or approved equivalent with either a filter or gel coagulant system or other containment to remove sediment. The remaining water will then be discharged to irrigation ditches. On upland areas sprinkler systems may be used to disperse the water in farmers’ fields. BMPs, as described in the SWPPP, will also be implemented, as appropriate, to retain, treat, and dispose of groundwater. Measures shall include but are not limited to:
• Retaining pumped groundwater in surface facilities to reduce turbidity and suspended sediments concentrations.
• Treating (i.e., flocculate) pumped groundwater, as appropriate, to reduce turbidity and concentrations of suspended sediments.
• Directly conveying pumped groundwater to a suitable land disposal area capable of percolating flows.
If contamination is suspected, water collected during dewatering will be tested for contamination prior to disposal. Discharges shall comply with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board’s requirements.
Mitigation Measure DFM-3: The City shall comply with all measures of the City’s Stormwater Quality Control Criteria Plan to effectively manage and minimize increases in stormwater runoff resulting from the operation of DWSP facilities. Measures to be implemented may include detention basins, vegetated swales, buffer strips, and/or infiltration basins.
EXHIBIT 1
748
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
New or
Substantially More
Severe Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
Impact Analysis Questions
(Table 3.5-3 of the certified
DWSP Program EIR):
BIO-1: Construction of DWSP
facilities would result in the
loss of jurisdictional waters
of the U.S., including
wetlands.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
BIO-2: Construction of DWSP
facilities could result in
impacts to special-status
species.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
BIO-3: Construction of the
proposed DWSP raw and
treated water pipelines could
result in temporary impacts
to riparian habitats or other
sensitive natural
communities.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
BIO-4: Construction of the
proposed DWSP raw and
treated water pipelines could
impact native wildlife
migration corridors or
nursery sites.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
BIO-5: The proposed DWSP
could conflict with adopted
City and County tree
preservation ordinances.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
BIO-6: The proposed DWSP
could conflict with the
SJMSCP.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
A Biological Resources Assessment was prepared by HELIX in February 2025 for the proposed Project and is included as Appendix B.
Affected Environment
The approximately 134.2-acre Study Area encompasses the entirety of the Project site, which includes the 78-acre permanent and temporary Project impact footprint adjacent to the existing DWTP and its infrastructure. The Study Area supports the existing water treatment facility with several structures, EXHIBIT 1
749
native plant landscaping, and sewer treatment ponds in addition to undeveloped land that supports valley grassland. The Study Area and surrounding area has changed little over the last 30 years based on a review of historic aerial imagery, which consists primarily of agricultural uses and rural residences. The DWTP was constructed on the northwestern portion of the Study Area in 2010.
Terrain in the Study Area is comprised of generally flat land with an elevation that ranges between approximately 18 to 30 feet amsl. The Study Area consists of developed areas with structures, ruderal/disturbed areas, and valley grassland, dominated by annual grasses and forbs. The Study Area does not support any natural drainages or wetlands, but agricultural ditches run along the northern and western border of the Study Area, with one upland ditch that originates in the Study Area and runs north to south, where it terminates in a vineyard.
The Study Area is in the San Joaquin Delta watershed (USGS Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 18040003). The Study Area is generally flat, and drainage of the Study Area is directed via sheet flow to upland roadside or agricultural ditches.
Soils
Two soil map units are mapped within the Study Area: Acampo sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, and Rioblancho clay loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes. The general characteristics and properties associated with these soils are described below (NRCS 2024a). • Acampo sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a moderately well-drained soil that consists o f
s
andy loam, underlain by dense cemented layers. The parent material for this soil is alluvium derived from granite. This soil unit is moderately well drained and is found on fan remnants. This soil map unit is considered to support prime farmland of statewide importance if it is irrigated.
M
inor components of this soil map unit are considered hydric on valley floors (NRCS 2024b). • Rioblancho clay loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a well-drained soil that consists of clay loam and sandy loam underlain by cemented layers. The parent material for this soil is alluvium derived from mixed rock sources. This soil unit is somewhat poorly drained and is found on rims on basin floors. This soil map unit covers the majority of the Study Area and is also rated as moderately alkaline. This soil map unit is considered to support prime farmland of statewide importance. This soil map unit is considered a hydric soil on basin floors (NRCS 2024b).
Vegetation Communities
Upland vegetation communities that occur within the Study Area include valley grassland, urban/industrial/built, sewer treatment ponds, ruderal, and drainage ditch. All habitat types in the Study Area were reviewed and compared to habitats mapped in the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) (SJMSCP 2000). These habitat types are discussed below.
Valley Grassland
A total of 89.38 acres of valley grassland habitats were mapped within the Study Area. This community includes open grasslands composed primarily of annual plant species. Many of these species also occur as understory plants in oak woodland and other habitats. Structure in valley grassland depends largely on weather patterns and livestock grazing; dramatic differences in physiognomy, both between seasons and between years, are characteristic of this habitat. Dominant species observed within valley grassland EXHIBIT 1
750
habitat in the Study Area include rattail six weeks grass (Festuca myuros), slender oats (Avena barbata), soft brome (Bromus hordeaceus), stinkwort (Dittrichia graveolens), and yellow star-thistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Prior to 2010, when the DWTP was constructed, areas currently mapped as valley grassland consisted of agricultural lands and has since been fallowed and returned to a grassland vegetation community that provide habitat for wildlife species that utilize grassland habitat.
The valley grassland community supports breeding, foraging, and shelter for several species of wildlife.
Spec
ies observed in the Study Area included red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus), and evidence of burrowing small mammals such as California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi).
Urban/Industrial/Built
Urban/industrial/built or developed areas comprise 21.37 acres in the Study Area. Urban/industrial/built consist of areas that are graveled or support buildings with associated ornamental vegetation. The eastern and central side of the Study Area is dominated by buildings and structures associated with the treatment facility. The treatment facility was built in 2010. Prior to the construction of the treatment plant, these areas consisted of agricultural fields.
Sewer Treatment Ponds
A total of 5.17 acres of sewer treatment ponds were mapped within the Study Area, consisting of five separate features. Three large basins are concrete-lined sludge basins and two smaller earthen basins are vegetated with riparian scrub vegetation. These features are maintained as part of the water treatment system and are not natural features. Additionally, earthen basins support hydrophytes, however, other wetland hydric soil indicators are not present in the soil.
Ruderal
A total of 18.12 acres of ruderal lands were mapped in the Study Area. Ruderal or disturbed areas have been subject to past or on-going human disturbance but retain a soil substrate. If vegetated, there is no recognizable plant community, and the species assemblage depends on local colonization potential.
Ruderal and disturbed areas include dirt roads, trails, parking areas, and weedy open areas where the natural vegetation has been removed. Ruderal and disturbed areas are not described in treatments of plant communities.
The eastern and central portion of the Study Area around the treatment facility is mostly ruderal, which was heavily disturbed by past activities likely associated with routine vegetation maintenance. Ruderal areas are dominated by rattail six weeks grass, slender oats, stinkwort, and yellow star-thistle.
Drainage ditch
A total of 0.18-acre of drainage ditch was mapped within the Study Area, consisting of one earthen ditch that occurs along the northern boundary of the Study Area. The ditch is associated with a vineyard north of the Study Area and appears to drain water from the vineyard and roadside drainage from North Lower Sacramento Road. The ditch originates along the roadside of North Lower Sacramento Road, where it continues west to another ditch outside of the Study Area. The ditch was mostly barren but was dominated by annual fireweed (Epilobium brachycarpum) and western ragweed (Erigeron bonariensis).
The ditch does not meet the three-parameter criteria for vegetation, hydrology, and soils to qualify as a wetland, and this ditch does not convey water for long enough duration to scour the ditch to exhibit an EXHIBIT 1
751
“ordinary high-water mark (OHWM)”. The ditch appears to be maintained in conjunction with the vineyard north of the Study Area.
Special-Status Species
Sensitive plant and wildlife species identified during database queries were evaluated for their potential to occur within the Study Area based on the results of the field survey and the criteria described below.
Listed and Special-Status Plants
According to the database query, 19 listed and/or special-status plant species have the potential to occur on-site or in the vicinity of the Study Area (CNPS 2024; CDFW 2024; USFWS 2024). Based on field observations, literature review, and published information, no listed and/or special-status plants have the potential to occur in the Study Area. Plants identified in the database query occur in vernal pools, fresh emergent wetlands and in habitat types or soils that do not occur in the Study Area. The Study Area is comprised of alkaline sandy loam and clay loam soils with no natural water resources. An upland or managed ditch occurs in the Study Area but does not support wetland conditions or convey enough flow to form an ordinary high-water mark. In addition, the Study Area previously consisted of agricultural lands and currently appears to be routinely disturbed and/or altered for vegetation management for the facility. There is no suitable habitat for special-status plants within the Study Area.
Listed and Special-Status Wildlife
According to the database query, 24 listed and/or special-status wildlife species have the potential to occur on-site or in the vicinity of the Study Area (CDFW 2024; USFWS 2024). Based on field observations, published information, and literature review, six special-status wildlife species have the potential to occur within the Study Area: valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus californicus), northwestern pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata), giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), and white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus).
These species are discussed in more detail below. In addition to these special-status wildlife species, other migratory birds and raptors protected under federal, State, and local laws/policies also have the potential to occur within the Study Area. The Study Area is not located within federally-designated critical habitat for any wildlife species.
Sensitive Habitats
Sensitive habitats include those that are of special concern to resource agencies or those that are protected under CEQA, Section 1600 of the FGC (i.e., riparian areas) and/or Sections 401 and 404 of the CWA, which include wetlands and other waters of the U.S. Sensitive habitats. Aquatic resources that may qualify as potential waters of the U.S. or State were not observed in the Study Area.
Wildlife corridors link areas of suitable wildlife habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance. This fragmentation of habitat can also occur when a portion of one or more habitats is converted into another habitat; for instance, when woodland or scrub habitat is altered or converted into grasslands after a disturbance such as fire, mudslide, or construction activities. Wildlife corridors mitigate the effects of this fragmentation by (1) allowing animals to move between remaining habitats thereby permitting depleted populations to be replenished and promoting genetic exchange; (2) providing escape routes from fire, predators, and human disturbances, thus reducing the risk of catastrophic events (such as fire or disease) on population or local species EXHIBIT 1
752
extinction; and (3) serving as travel routes for individual animals as they move within their home ranges in search of food, water, mates, and other needs. The Study Area is located in an area of San Joaquin County surrounded by busy roadways and agricultural lands.
Methods
Biological studies conducted for the Study Area consisted of a special-status species evaluation that included a desktop review and database searches to identify known biological resources in the Study Area and vicinity, as well as a biological and wetland field survey.
Database and Literature Review
Before conducting the field survey, background research was conducted to inform and create target lists to focus the survey efforts. Accessible information in public databases pertaining to natural resources in the region of the Study Area was queried and provided in Appendix A of Appendix B.
Biological Surveys
The biological and wetland reconnaissance survey was conducted on October 22, 2024, by HELIX biologists Patrick Martin and Kate Valdez. The weather during the field survey was clear and warm with a high temperature of 80 degrees Fahrenheit and relatively calm winds and clear conditions. The Study Area was systematically surveyed on foot to ensure total search coverage, with special attention given to portions of the Study Area with the potential to support special-status species and sensitive habitats.
Binoculars were used to further extend site coverage and identify species observed. Following the field survey, the potential for each species identified in the database query to occur within the Study Area was determined based on the site survey, soils, habitats present within the Study Area, and species- specific information, as shown in Appendix B of Appendix B. All plant and animal species observed on- site during the surveys were recorded in Appendix C of Appendix B. All biological communities occurring within the Study Area were characterized according to the SJMSCP vegetation classifications (SJMSCP 2000).
Summary of Impacts from the certified Stockton Delta Water Supply Project Program EIR Biological resources impacts are discussed in Section 3.5, Biological Resources, of the certified DWSP Program EIR. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities would result in the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands; however, it was determined that no impact would occur from construction of the WTP because there were no jurisdictional waters on the WTP site. Additionally, construction of the DWSP facilities could result in impacts to the following special-status species: giant garter snake, Swainson’s hawk, western pond turtle, white-tailed kite, other nesting raptors, loggerhead shrike, western burrowing owl, Suisun marsh aster, rose mallow, Delta tule pea, Mason’s lilaeopsis, Delta mudwort, eel-grass pondweed, Sanford’s arrowhead, marsh skullcap, and blue skullcap; however, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be less than significant with incorporation of Mitigation Measures BIO-2a and BIO-2b. Further, the certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP raw and treated water pipelines could result in temporary impacts to riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities; however, it was determined that no impact would occur from construction of the WTP. Construction of the DWSP raw and treated water pipelines could impact native wildlife migration corridors or nursery sites; however, it was determined that there would be no impact to wildlife migration corridors from construction of the WTP. The certified DWSP Program EIR also concluded that the DWSP facilities could conflict with adopted City and County tree preservation ordinances; however, the impact from the WTP was EXHIBIT 1
753
determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-5. Lastly, the DWSP facilities would be consistent with the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP); therefore, it was determined that no impact would occur from the WTP.
Impact Analysis
The impact analysis questions related to biological resources are included in Table 3.5-3, Summary of Impacts – Biological Resources, in Section 3.5, Biological Resources, of the certified DWSP Program EIR.
BIO-1: Construction of DWSP facilities would result in the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities would result in the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands; however, it was determined that no impact would occur for the WTP because there are no jurisdictional features on the WTP site.
The proposed Project would be constructed immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP. No aquatic resources that may qualify as potential waters of the U.S. or State were observed on the Project site.
Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., and no impact would occur. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
BIO-2: Construction of DWSP facilities could result in impacts to special-status species.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities could result in impacts to the following special-status species: giant garter snake, Swainson’s hawk, western pond turtle, whitetailed kite, other nesting raptors, loggerhead shrike, western burrowing owl, Suisun marsh aster, rose mallow, Delta tule pea, Mason’s lilaeopsis, Delta mudwort, eel-grass pondweed, Sanford’s arrowhead, marsh skullcap, and blue skullcap; however, the impact for the WTP was determined to be reduced to less than significant with incorporation of Mitigation Measures BIO-2a and BIO-2b.
Listed and Special Status-Plant Species
According to the database query, 19 listed and/or special-status plant species have the potential to occur on-site or in the vicinity of the Project site. Based on field observations, literature review, and published information, no listed and/or special-status plants have the potential to occur in the Project site. Plants identified in the database query occur in vernal pools, fresh emergent wetlands and in habitat types or soils that do not occur in the Project site. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not impact listed or special-status plant species, and no mitigation would be necessary. i Listed and Special-Status Wildlife
The Project site contains potential habitat for special-status wildlife species, including valley elderberry longhorn beetle, northwestern pond turtle, giant garter snake, burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, and white-tailed kite, as well as potential habitat for nesting migratory birds and raptors. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2a from the certified DWSP Program EIR potential impacts from construction of DWSP facilities would be reduced, which includes the proposed Project, and would EXHIBIT 1
754
apply to the proposed Project. An abridged version of the applicable portion of Mitigation Measure BIO- 2a is provided below:
The City anticipates that the DWSP would be approved for participation in the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) for the land-based facilities (pipelines and WTP). Compliance with the SJMSCP would provide for impact avoidance measures (e.g., pre-construction surveys during appropriate seasons for identification, construction set-backs, restriction on construction timing) and mitigation for loss of habitat for all species that may be affected by this impact, with the exception of eelgrass pondweed and marsh skullcap. Impact avoidance measures would include, but are not limited to, the species- specific measures presented below, which are summarized from the SJMSCP.
Complete impact avoidance and habitat compensation measures for special-status species with the potential to occur in the Project site, consistent with the SJMSCP, are discussed for each species below. (Note: The applicable measures from Mitigation Measure BIO-2a in the certified DWSP Program EIR, consistent with the SJMSCP, are identified as Mitigation Measures BIO-2a.i, BIO-2a.ii, BIO-2a.iii, BIO- 2a.iv, BIO-2a.v, BIO-2a.vi, and BIO-2a.vii for purposes of clarity within this IS/Addendum).
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle
The Project site contains suitable habitat for valley elderberry longhorn beetle (VELB) since elderberry shrubs located along the entrance roadway provide habitat for this species, with several shrubs supporting multiple stems over one inch diameter as measured at the base of the shrub. However, elderberry shrubs are not located within the Project impact footprint and are unlikely to be impacted by the Project. Although the potential for Project impacts to elderberry shrubs remains low, the proposed Project would implement Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.i, which contains measures from Section 5.2.4.1 of the SJMSCP, to avoid potential impacts to a less than significant level to VELB in areas with elderberry bushes.
Northwestern Pond Turtle
The Project site contains suitable habitat for northwestern pond turtle within sewer treatment ponds and a canal located to the west of the Project site. Adjacent upland areas near the sewer treatment ponds and canal may provide nesting or refuge habitat for northwestern pond turtles. If present within the Project site, this species could be impacted by the proposed Project during implementation of Project activities that include the installation of pipelines and establishment of laydown areas or other temporary disturbance areas. The installation of the proposed recharge basins are outside of the 300- foot buffer zone recommended by the SJMSCP. However, to avoid potential impacts to northwestern pond turtle during Project construction, Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.ii would be implemented to reduce potential impacts to a less-than-significant level, which contains measures from Section 5.2.4.10 of the SJMSCP.
Giant Garter Snake
The Project site contains suitable habitat for giant garter snake within sewer treatment ponds and a ditch located west of the Project site. Adjacent upland areas near aquatic features may provide refuge habitat for giant garter snake. Ditches that occur adjacent to the Project site are contiguous with the White Slough area, which is considered to be occupied by the giant garter snake. If present within the Project site, this species could be impacted by the proposed Project during implementation of Project EXHIBIT 1
755
activities that include the installation of pipelines and establishment of laydown areas or other temporary disturbance areas. The installation of the proposed recharge basins are outside of the 200- foot buffer zone recommended by the SJMSCP. However, to avoid potential impacts to giant garter snake during construction, Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.iii would be implemented to reduce potential impacts to a less-than-significant level, which contains measures from Section 5.2.4.8 of the SJMSCP.
Burrowing Owl
The Project site contains suitable habitat for burrowing owl in open areas such as valley grassland.
Additional suitable habitat is present within the vicinity of the Project site in other opens areas or along ditches. If present within the Project site, burrowing owl could be impacted by all aspects of the proposed Project through grading, vegetation removal, or other Project related activities. To avoid potential impacts to burrowing owl during construction, Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.iv would be implemented to reduce potential impacts to a less-than-significant level, which contains measures from Section 5.2.4.15 of the SJMSCP.
Swainson’s Hawk
Swainson’s hawk has a high potential to occur in the vicinity of the Project site due to the presence of suitable nesting and foraging habitat and known occurrences within five miles of the Project site. If the Project activities take place during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31), nesting Swainson’s hawks may be impacted during all aspects of the proposed Project. If Project activities take place outside of the nesting season, no mitigation measures for Swainson’s hawk are required. If Project activities take place during the nesting season, Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.v, which contains measures from Section 5.2.4.11 of the SJMSCP, and Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.vii, which contains measures from Section 5.2.3.1(G) of the SJMSCP, would be implemented to avoid or minimize potential impacts, reducing them to a less than significant level, to Swainson’s hawk.
White-tailed Kite
The Project site contains suitable habitat for white-tailed kite in trees with foraging habitat in open areas that consist of ruderal areas and valley grassland. Additional suitable habitat is present within the vicinity of the Project in other opens areas or trees. If present within the Project site, white-tailed kite could be impacted by during all aspects of the proposed Project. To avoid potential impacts to white- tailed kite, the Project would implement Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.vi, which contains measures from Section 5.2.4.19 of the SJMSCP, consistent with the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act described in Section 5.2.3.1(G) of the SJMSCP, to reduce impacts to a less than significant level to the white-tailed kite.
Migratory Birds
Several special-status species of migratory birds have the potential to forage and nest in the Project site, including special-status species such red-tailed hawk, western meadowlark, and other migratory birds.
Active nests are protected by the California Fish and Game Code Section 3503.5 and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The SJMSCP covers lawful activities which must comply with all federal, State, and local laws for coverage. In addition to the applicable measures of Section 5.4.2 of the SJMSCP, identified above in Mitigation Measures BIO-2a.i through BIO-2a.vi, Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.vii would also be implemented to avoid impacts to migratory birds, which includes Section 5.2.3.1(G) of the SJMSCP, reducing the Project impacts to a less than significant level.
EXHIBIT 1
756
Proposed Project Impact Discussion
The proposed Project would implement the applicable measures contained within Mitigation Measure BIO-2a, as identified in the certified DWSP Program EIR, to mitigate potential impacts to special-status species and migratory birds. Mitigation Measure BIO-2b would not be applicable to the proposed Project, as this measure only applies to the raw water pipeline components of the DWSP that would impact eel-grass pondweed and marsh skullcap. Therefore, with implementation of the applicable measures contained within Mitigation Measure BIO-2a, and consistent with the applicable measures contained within SJMSCP, the impact would be less than significant. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
BIO-3: Construction of the proposed DWSP raw and treated water pipelines could result in temporary impacts to riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP raw and treated water pipelines could result in temporary impacts to riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities; however, it was determined that no impact would occur for the WTP because there is no riparian habitat or sensitive natural community on the WTP site.
Upland vegetation communities that occur within the Project site i nclude valley grassland, urban/industrial/built, sewer treatment ponds, ruderal, and drainage ditch. The proposed Project would permanently impact 64.21 acres of valley grassland (63.66 acres), ruderal (0.09 acre), urban/industrial/built (0.45 acre), and an earthen sewer treatment pond (0.01 acre) from construction of the groundwater recharge basins, viewing platform, and associated infrastructure and improvements (e.g., parking lot, visitor restroom, pipelines, fencing). Stockpiling of dirt and construction materials during Project construction would result in temporary impacts to 13.65 acres of valley grassland (13.53 acres) and urban/industrial/built (0.12 acre) that would be restored to pre-Project conditions following Project construction. The proposed Project would be constructed immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP, which is currently developed with a total of 5.17 acres of sewer treatment ponds consisting of five separate features. Three large basins are concrete-lined sludge basins and two smaller earthen basins are vegetated with riparian scrub vegetation. However, these features are maintained as part of the water treatment system and are not natural features. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not temporarily impact riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities. No impact would occur, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
BIO-4: Construction of the proposed DWSP raw and treated water pipelines could impact native wild
life migration corridors or nursery sites.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP raw and treated water pipelines could impact native wildlife migration corridors or nursery sites, and it was determined that there would be no impact for the WTP because there is no wildlife migration corridor or nursery site at the WTP site. Wildlife corridors link areas of suitable wildlife habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance.
The Project site is located immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP and is substantially surrounded by roadways and agricultural lands. For these reasons, construction of the Project would not adversely EXHIBIT 1
757
affect wildlife migration corridors or nursery sites. No impact would occur, there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
BIO-5: The proposed DWSP could conflict with adopted City and County tree preservation ordinances.
No New
or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that the DWSP facilities could conflict with adopted City and County tree preservation ordinances; however, the impact for the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-5.
The Project site primarily consists of valley grassland. Trees on the Project site are limited to the northern perimeter of the site and immediately east of the DWTP. No tree removal is anticipated for the proposed Project; however, Mitigation Measure BIO-5 would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented. The impact would be less than significant with mitigation, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
BIO-6: The proposed DWSP would be consistent with the SJMSCP.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR determined that the DWSP’s conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural land uses would not decrease the majority of the acreage available for coverage under the SJMSCP; therefore, the DWSP was determined to be consistent with the SJMSCP and no impact would occur from implementation of the WTP. The determination of the DWSP’s consistency with the SJMSCP was based on the San Joaquin County Joint Powers Authority (JPA) approval required by the City prior to approval of the DWSP Program EIR.
Further, the JPA was required to determine that the applicable SJMSCP measures implemented in the certified DWSP Program EIR would appropriately mitigate impacts on the SJMSCP covered species.
The proposed Project would be located adjacent to the City’s existing DWTP, which is located in the Central Zone of the SJMSCP. As discussed in Impact BIO-2, the Project would implement the applicable measures contained in Mitigation Measure BIO-2a of the certified DWSP Program EIR, consistent with measures contained in the SJMSCP. With implementation of these mitigation measures, the Project would not conflict with a local, regional, or State conservation plan. Therefore, no impact would occur, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure BIO-2a: The City anticipates that the DWSP would be approved for participation in the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) for the land- based facilities (pipelines and WTP). Compliance with the SJMSCP would provide for impact avoidance measures (e.g., pre-construction surveys during appropriate seasons for identification, construction set- backs, restriction on construction timing) and mitigation for loss of habitat for all species that may be affected by this impact, with the exception of eelgrass pondweed and marsh skullcap. Impact avoidance measures would include, but are not limited to, the species-specific measures presented below, which are summarized from the SJMSCP.
Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.i: Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle EXHIBIT 1
758
The following mitigation measure is from Section 5.2.4.1 of the SJMSCP.
A. If elderberry shrubs are present on the Project site, a setback of 20 feet from the dripline of each elderberry bush shall be established.
B. Brightly colored flags or fencing shall be placed surrounding elderberry shrubs throughout the construction process.
C. F
or all shrubs without evidence of VELB exit holes which cannot be retained on the Project site as described in A and B, above, the JPA shall, during preconstruction surveys, count all stems of 1" or greater in diameter at ground level. Compensation for removal of these stems shall be provided by the JPA within SJMSCP Preserves as provided in SJMSCP Section 5.5.4(B).
D. For all shrubs with evidence of VELB exit holes, the JPA shall undertake transplanting o f
e
lderberry shrubs displaying evidence of VELB occupation to VELB mitigation sites during the dormant period for elderberry shrubs (November 1 - February 15). For elderberry shrubs displaying evidence of VELB occupation which cannot be transplanted, compensation for removal of shrubs shall be as provided in SJMSCP Section 5.5.4 (C).
Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.ii: Pond Turtles
The following mitigation measure is from Section 5.2.4.10 of the SJMSCP.
When nesting areas for northwestern pond turtles are identified on a Project site, a buffer area of 300 feet shall be established between the nesting site (which may be immediately adjacent to wetlands or extend up to 400 feet away from wetland areas in uplands) and the wetland located near the nesting site. These buffers shall be indicated by temporary fencing if construction has or will begin before nesting periods are ended (the period from egg laying to emergence of hatchlings is normally April to November).
Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.iii: Giant Garter Snake
The following mitigation measure is from Section 5.2.4.8(B) of the SJMSCP.
B. For areas with potential giant garter snake habitat, the following is required. Potential GGS habitat elements are described in SJMSCP Section 2.2.2.2 and exist in the Primary Zone o f
t
he Delta and the Central Zone contiguous with known occupied habitat in the White Slough area north to the San Joaquin/Sacramento County line and south to Paradise Cut; in the Central Zone east of Stockton in Duck Creek, Mormon Slough, Stockton Diverting Canal, Little John’s Creek, Lone Tree Creek, and French Camp Slough (wherever habitat elements are present); and the Southern Central Zone and Southwest/Central Transition Zone including the area east of County Route J4 from the Alameda-San Joaquin County Line to Tracy and area south of Tracy and east of Interstate 580 to the east edge of Agricultu ral
H
abitat Lands east of the San Joaquin River.
1. Construction shall occur during the active period for the snake, between May 1 and October 1. Between October 2nd and April 30th, the JPA, with the concurrence of the EXHIBIT 1
759
Permitting Agencies' representatives on the TAC, shall determine if additional measures are necessary to minimize and avoid take.
2. Limit vegetation clearing within 200 feet of the banks of potential giant garter snake aquatic habitat to the minimal area necessary.
3. Confine the movement of heavy equipment within 200 feet of the banks of potential giant garter snake aquatic habitat to existing roadways to minimize habitat disturbance.
4. Prior to ground disturbance, all on-site construction personnel shall be given instruction regarding the presence of SJMSCP Covered Species and the importance of avoiding impacts to these species and their habitats.
5. In areas where wetlands, irrigation ditches, marsh areas or other potential giant garter snake habitats are being retained on the site:
a. Install temporary fencing at the edge of the construction area and the adjacent wetland, marsh, or ditch;
b. Restrict working areas, spoils and equipment storage and other Project activities to areas outside of marshes, wetlands and ditches; and
c. Maintain water quality and limit construction runoff into wetland areas through the use of hay bales, filter fences, vegetative buffer strips, or other accepted equivalents.
6. If on-site wetlands, irrigation ditches, marshes, etc. are being relocated in the vicinity:
the newly created aquatic habitat shall be created and filled with water prior to dewatering and destroying the pre-existing aquatic habitat. In addition, non-predatory fish species that exist in the aquatic habitat and which are to be relocated shall be seined and transported to the new aquatic habitat as the old site is dewatered.
7. If wetlands, irrigation ditches, marshes, etc. will not be relocated in the vicinity, then the aquatic habitat shall be dewatered at least two weeks prior to commencing construction.
8. Pre-construction surveys for the giant garter snake (conducted after completion of environmental reviews and prior to ground disturbance) shall occur within 24 hours of ground disturbance.
9. Other provisions of the USFWS Standard Avoidance and Minimization Measures during Construction Activities in Giant Garter Snake Habitat shall be implemented (excluding programmatic mitigation ratios which are superseded by the SJMSCP’s mitigation ratios).
Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.iv: Burrowing Owls
The following mitigation measure is from Section 5.2.4.15 of the SJMSCP.
EXHIBIT 1
760
The presence of ground squirrels and squirrel burrows are attractive to burrowing owls.
Burrowing owls may therefore be discouraged from entering or occupying construction areas by discouraging the presence of ground squirrels. To accomplish this, the Project proponent should prevent ground squirrels from occupying the Project site early in the planning process by employing one of the following practices:
A. The Project proponent may plant new vegetation or retain existing vegetation entirely covering the site at a height of approximately 36" above the ground. Vegetation should be retained until construction begins. Vegetation will discourage both ground squirrel and owl use of the site.
B. Alternatively, if burrowing owls are not known or suspected on a Project site and the area is an unlikely occupation site for red-legged frogs, San Joaquin kit fox, or tiger salamanders:
The Project proponent may disc or plow the entire Project site to destroy any ground squirrel burrows. At the same time burrows are destroyed, ground squirrels should be removed through one of the following approved methods to prevent reoccupation of the Project site. Detailed descriptions of these methods are included in Appendix A, Protecting Endangered Species, Interim Measures for Use of Pesticides in San Joaquin County, dated March 2000:
1. Anticoagulants. Establish bait stations using the approved rodenticide anticoagulants.
Rodenticides shall be used in compliance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency label standards and as directed by the San Joaquin County Agricultural Commissioner. It should be noted, that although the SJMSCP recommends the use of anticoagulants that include Chlorophacinone or Diphacinone, however these chemicals have recently been banned in California.
2. Zinc Phosphide. Establish bait stations with non-treated grain 5-7 calendar days in advance of rodenticide application, then apply Zinc Phosphide to bait stations.
Rodenticides shall be used in compliance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency label standards and as directed by the San Joaquin County Agricultural Commissioner.
3. Fumigants. Use below-ground gas cartridges or pellets and seal burrows. Approved fumigants include Aluminum Phosphide (Fumitoxin, Phostoxin) and gas cartridges sold by the local Agricultural Commissioner's office. NOTE: Crumpled newspaper covered with soil is often an effective seal for burrows when fumigants are used. Fumigants shall be used in compliance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency label standards and as directed by the San Joaquin County Agricultural Commissioner.
4. Traps. For areas with minimal rodent populations, traps may be effective for eliminating rodents. If trapping activities are required, the use of, shall be consistent with all applicable laws and regulations.
If the measures described above were not attempted or were attempted but failed, and burrowing owls are known to occupy the Project site, then the following measures shall be implemented:
EXHIBIT 1
761
C. During the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31) burrowing owls occupying the Project site should be evicted from the Project site by passive relocation as described in the California Department of Fish and Game’s Staff Report on Burrowing Ow
ls (Oct, 1995).
D. During the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) occupied burrows shall not be disturbed and shall be provided with a 75 meter protective buffer until and unless the TAC, with the concurrence of the Permitting Agencies’ representatives on the TAC; or unless a qualified biologist approved by the Permitting Agencies verifies through non- invasive means that either: 1) the birds have not begun egg laying, or 2) juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independen t
s
urvival. Once the fledglings are capable of independent survival, the burrow can be destroyed.
These Incidental Take Minimization Measures are consistent with the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as described in Section 5.2.3.1(G) of the SJMSCP.
Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.v: Swainson’s Hawk
The following mitigation measure is from Section 5.2.4.11 of the SJMSCP.
The Project proponent has the option of retaining known or potential Swainson's hawk nest trees (i.e., trees that hawks are known to have nested in within the past three years or trees, such as large oaks, which the hawks prefer for nesting) or removing the nest trees.
If the Project proponent elects to retain a nest tree, and in order to encourage tree retention, the following Incidental Take Minimization Measure shall be implemented during construction activities:
• If a nest tree becomes occupied during construction activities, then all construction activities shall remain a distance of two times the dripline of the tree, measured from the nest.
Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.vi: Birds Nesting Along Riparian Corridors (Cooper’s Hawk, Yellow- Breasted Chat, Osprey, White-Tailed Kite)
The following mitigation measure is from Section 5.2.4.19 of the SJMSCP.
A. For white-tailed kites, preconstruction surveys shall investigate all potential nesting trees on the Project site (e.g., especially tree tops 15-59 feet above the ground in oak, willow, eucalyptus, cottonwood, or other deciduous trees), during the nesting season (February 15 to September 15) whenever white-tailed kites are noted on-site or within the vicinity of the Project site during the nesting season.
B. For the Cooper's hawk, yellow-breasted chat, osprey and white-tailed kite, a setback of 100 feet from nesting areas shall be established and maintained during the nesting season fo r
t
he period encompassing nest building and continuing until fledglings leave nests. This setback applies whenever construction or other ground-disturbing activities must begin EXHIBIT 1
762
during the nesting season in the presence of nests which are known to be occupied.
Setbacks shall be marked by brightly colored temporary fencing.
These Incidental Take Minimization Measures are consistent with the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as described in Section 5.2.3.1(G).
Mitigation Measure BIO-2a.vii: Incidental Take Minimization Strategy and Expectations for All SJMSCP Covered Species
The following mitigation measure is from Section 5.2.3.1(G) of the SJMSCP.
Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703-711), it is unlawful at any time, by any means or in any manner to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill, attempt to take, capture, or kill any migratory bird, any part, nest, or eggs of any such bird is defined as Take. All SJMSCP Covered Bird Species are subject to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Because the SJMSCP is based on the more stringent, federal standard for "Take" pursuant to the ESA which includes modification of habitat, Incidental Take Permits for SJMSCP Covered Bird Species are included in the SJMSCP, to allow for the Conversion of habitat for SJMSCP Covered Bird Species with appropriate creation of compensatory habitat for these species. To fulfill the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, however, the Incidental Take Minimization Measures of the SJMSCP for all SJMSCP Covered Bird Species must result in no Take, as Take is defined by the MBTA, of SJMSCP Covered Bird Species.
Mitigation Measure BIO-5: The City shall ensure that the DWSP complies with San Joaquin County’s General Plan Tree Preservation and Riparian Habitat requirements, and with the City’s Tree Preservation ordinance. Prior to construction, the City shall conduct a survey for heritage trees that may be impacted by the Project (i.e., the dripline of trees is within the treated water pipeline alignment). The City shall coordinate with City and County staff to ensure that impacts to heritage trees are avoided to the extent feasible.
If it is necessary to remove a heritage tree, a permit will be obtained from the City’s Parks and Recreation Department. The tree(s) will be replaced on a one for one basis at the discretion of the City’s Landscape Architect. The size of the replacement tree shall be based on the size of the tree removed.
If heritage trees are identified in riparian areas, the City shall implement Mitigation Measure BIO-
3. EXHIBIT 1
763
V. AIR QUALITY
New or
Substantially More
Severe Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant with
Mitigation Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
Impact Analysis Questions
(Table 3.6-3 of the certified
DWSP Program EIR):
AIR-1: Construction of DWSP
facilities would result in a
temporary increase in air
pollutant emissions.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
AIR-2: Operation of DWSP
facilities would result in air
emissions from powering of
pumps, various processes,
and equipment at the WTP
and from vehicle trips to
DWSP facilities.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
AIR-3: Operation of DWSP
facilities could result in
odors.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
An Air Quality Analysis was prepared by HELIX in February 2025 for the proposed Project and is included as Appendix C.
Affected Environment
The proposed Project is located in unincorporated San Joaquin County, which lies within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). Air quality in the SJVAB is regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) at the federal level, by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) at the state level, and by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) at the regional level.
The SJVAB comprises all or part of eight counties: San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Fresno, Merced, Madera, Kings, Tulare, and Kern. The distinctive climate of the SJVAB is determined by its terrain and geographic location. The SJVAB is in the southern half of California’s Central Valley and is 250 miles long and averages 35 miles wide. The SJVAB is bounded by the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the east, the Coast Ranges to the west, the Tehachapi Mountains to the south, and is open to the Sacramento Valley and San Francisco Bay Area to the north.
The SJVAB is in a Mediterranean climate zone which is characterized by typically hot and dry summers and sparse rainfall mainly during the winter. Especially in summer, winds in the SJVAB most frequently blow from the northwesterly direction. The region’s topographic features restrict air movement and channel the air mass towards the southeastern end of the basin. A secondary but significant summer wind pattern is from the southeasterly direction and can be associated with nighttime drainage winds from the Sierra Nevada Mountains, and prefrontal conditions. Many days in the winter are marked by stagnation events where winds are very weak. Transport of pollutants during winter can be very limited.
EXHIBIT 1
764
The vertical dispersion of air pollutants in the SJVAB can be limited by persistent temperature inversions. Temperature inversions that occur on the summer days are usually encountered 2,000 to 2,500 feet above the valley floor. In winter months, overnight inversions occur 500 to 1,500 feet above the valley floor. The mountains surrounding the basin are mostly above the typical summer height of inversion layers, restricting dispersion of pollutants (SJVAPCD 2015).
Sensitive Receptors
CARB and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) have identified the following groups of individuals as the most likely to be affected by air pollution: adults over 65, children under 14, infants (including in utero in the third trimester of pregnancy), and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis, known as sensitive receptors (CARB 2005; OEHHA 2015). Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others due to the types of population groups or activities involved and are referred to as sensitive receptor locations. Examples of these sensitive receptor locations are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers.
The closest existing sensitive receptor locations to the Project site are single-family residential homes located 160 feet west/southwest of the Project site. The nearest schools to the Project site include Elkhorn Elementary School, located 1.4 miles southwest of the Project site and Podesta Ranch Elementary School, located approximately 1.9 miles south of the Project site.
Summary of Impacts from the certified Stockton Delta Water Supply Project Program EIR Air quality impacts are discussed in Section 3.6, Air Quality, of the certified DWSP Program EIR. The document concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities would result in a temporary increase in air pollutant emissions, but the impact was determined to be less than significant for PM10 and CO. And although the certified DWSP Program EIR identified Mitigation Measure AIR-1a and AIR-1b, the impact remained significant and unavoidable for NOx and ROG. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that operation of the DWSP facilities would result in air emissions from powering of pumps, various processes, and equipment at the WTP and from vehicle trips to the DWSP facilities; however, the impact from operation of the WTP would be reduced to a less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-2. Lastly, the certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that operation of the DWSP facilities would not generate odors; therefore, it was determined that no impact would occur from operation of the WTP.
Impact Analysis
The impact analysis questions related to air quality are included in Table 3.6-3, Summary of Impacts – Air Quality, in Section 3.6, Air Quality, of the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact AIR-1: Construction of DWSP facilities would result in a temporary increase in air pollutant emissions.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities would result in a temporary increase in air pollutant emissions, and the impact would be less than significant for particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM
10)and carbon monoxide (CO). However, the certified DWSP Program EIR determined that even with EXHIBIT 1
765
Mitigation Measure AIR-1a and AIR-1b, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and reactive organic gases (ROG).
SJVAPCD recommended that determination of significance with respect to construction impacts be based not on quantification of emissions and comparison to thresholds, but upon inclusion of feasible control measures for PM10 and compliance with SJVAPCD Regulation VIII, Rule 8011. Compliance with Regulation VIII and implementation of appropriate measures to control PM10 emissions are considered to be sufficient to render a Project’s impacts less than significant.
Although no thresholds are required to determine the significance of construction impacts, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2022.1 was used to quantify Project-generated construction emissions for informational purposes only. Assumptions included in the model are described in Methodology and Assumptions and the detailed model output sheets are included in Attachment B of Appendix C. Construction of the proposed Project is anticipated to begin May of 2025 and be completed in June 2026. The quantity, duration, and intensity of construction activity influence the amount of construction emissions and related pollutant concentrations that occur at any one time.
As such, the emission forecasts provided herein reflect a specific set of conservative assumptions based on the expected construction scenario wherein a relatively large amount of construction activity is occurring in a relatively intensive manner. Because of this conservative assumption, actual emissions could be less than those forecasted. If construction is delayed or occurs over a longer time period, emissions could be reduced because of: (1) a more modern and cleaner-burning construction equipment fleet mix than assumed in CalEEMod; and/or (2) a less intensive buildout schedule (i.e., fewer daily emissions occurring over a longer time interval).
The Project’s construction emissions were estimated using CalEEMod, as described above. The emissions generated from construction activities include:
• Dust (including PM
10 and PM2.5), primarily from fugitive sources such as soil disturbance and vehicle travel over paved and unpaved surfaces; and
• Combustion emissions of air pollutants (including ROG, NOX, PM10, PM2.5, CO, and sulfur oxides [SOX]), primarily from operation of heavy off-road equipment and haul trucks.
The results of the calculations for Project construction are shown below in Table 1, Annual Construction Emissions, on the following page. The data is presented as the annual anticipated emissions for comparison with the SJVAPCD thresholds. The data shown assumes application of water sprayed onto exposed surfaces a minimum of two times per day in compliance with SJVAPCD Rule 8021, Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and other Earth Moving Activities.
EXHIBIT 1
766
Table 1
ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Year Pollutant Emissions (tons per year)
ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
2025 0.3 2.5 2.8 <0.1 0.4 0.2
2026 <0.1 0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Maximum Annual Emissions 0.3 2.5 2.8 <0.1 0.4 0.2
SJVAPCD Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
Significant Impact? No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod (Appendix C); Thresholds: SJVAPCD 2015 ROG = reactive organic gas; NOX = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; SO2 = sulfur dioxide; PM10 = respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less; SJVAPCD = San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
As shown in Table 1, the Project’s construction emissions would not exceed SJVAPCD thresholds and would not result in a temporary increase in air pollutant emissions. To further reduce Project construction emissions, Mitigation Measure AIR-1a would be required to ensure compliance with SJVAPCD Regulation VIII. Under Mitigation Measure AIR-1a, a Dust Control Plan would be submitted to the SJVAPCD prior to the start of construction. Additionally, Mitigation Measure AIR-1b would be implemented to reduce ozone precursor emissions.
As outlined in Section 3.6 of the certified Program EIR, impacts related to construction of the DWSP were determined to be less than significant for PM10 and CO and significant and unavoidable for NOX and ROG even with implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR-1a and AIR-1b. While the Project would contribute to those emissions, it would not result in a new or substantially more severe impact than what was previously evaluated in the certified Program EIR.
Impact AIR-2: Operation of DWSP facilities would result in air emissions from powering of pumps, various processes, and equipment at the WTP and from vehicle trips to DWSP facilities.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that operation of the DWSP facilities would result in air emissions from powering of pumps, various processes, and equipment at the WTP and from vehicle trips to the DWSP facilities; however, the impact for the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-
2. Operational activities associated with the proposed Project would include occasional maintenance trips for the on-site visitor restroom and landscaping. A total of 39.5 lbs/day of solid waste would be generated from visitors. A truck would service the septic tank for the restroom (if connection to existing utilities is not feasible) six times a year, and landscape maintenance, including weed and irrigation maintenance, would occur two to four times a year. Staff that currently operate the DWTP facility would perform the O&M tasks required for the proposed Project, and no new employees would be required for the proposed Project. Therefore, operation of the Project would not result in a population increase and would not generate new vehicle trips beyond occasional maintenance activities. These minor operational activity maintenance trips are within the scope of what was covered in the initial Program EIR, and therefore, the proposed Project would not result in additional operational emissions beyond what was previously evaluated.
EXHIBIT 1
767
As outlined in Section 3.6 of the certified DWSP Program EIR, operational impacts were found to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-2, which required operational equipment to operate in compliance with SJVAPCD permit requirements and regulations.
Operational impacts associated with the proposed Project would still remain less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-2. Therefore, the Project would not substantially increase operational emissions compared to the initial DWSP Program EIR, and no new or substantially more severe impact would occur compared to what was previously evaluated in the DWSP Program EIR.
AIR-3: Operation of DWSP facilities could result in odors.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that operation of the DWSP facilities would not generate odors; therefore, no impact would occur for the WTP.
The DWSP Program EIR concluded that operation of the DWSP facilities would not generate odors; therefore, no impact would occur for the WTP. As noted in Section 3.6 of the Program EIR, WTP are not documented sources of odors in the SJVAPCD Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (SJVAPCD 2015). Therefore, as the proposed Project would construct groundwater recharge basins at the WTP, the operation of the Project would not result in odors affecting a substantial number of people. The Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people and no impact would occur.
The Project would have no impact related to odors, consistent with the DWSP Program EIR; therefore, no new or substantially more severe impact would occur compared to what was evaluated in the DWSP Program EIR.
Mitigation Measures
The certified DWSP Program EIR identified Mitigation Measures AIR-1a, AIR-1b, and AIR-2 to mitigate impacts related to air quality from implementation of the WTP. As described above, all mitigation measures identified for the WTP related to air quality would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented. These mitigation measures are provided below.
Mitigation Measure AIR-1a: The City shall comply with Regulation VIII and implement its control measures during construction. The following applicable control measures listed by the Valley Air District shall be implemented, where appropriate.
• The City shall submit a Dust Control Plan subject to review and approval of the Valley Air District at least 30 days prior to the start of any construction activity on a site that includes five acres or more of disturbed surface area.
Specific control measures for construction, excavation, extraction, and other earthmoving activities listed by the Valley Air District include:
Pre-Activity
o Pre-water site sufficient to limit visible dust emissions to 20 percent opacity, and EXHIBIT 1
768
o Phase work to reduce the amount of disturbed surface area at any one time.
During Active Operations
o Apply water or chemical/organic stabilizers/suppressants sufficient to limit the visible dust emissions to 20 percent opacity; or
o Construct and maintain wind barriers sufficient to limit the visible dust emissions to 20 percent opacity. If utilizing wind barriers, the above control measure shall also be implemented.
o Apply water or chemical/organic stabilizers/suppressants to unpaved haul/access roads and unpaved vehicle/equipment traffic areas sufficient to limit the visible dust emissions to 20 percent opacity and meet the conditions of a stabilized unpaved road surface.
Temporary Stabilization During Periods of Inactivity
o Restrict vehicular access to the area; and
o Apply water or chemical/organic stabilizers/suppressants, sufficient to comply with the conditions of a stabilized surface. If 0.5 acres or more of disturbed surface area remains unused for seven or more days, the area must comply with the conditions for a stabilized surface area as defined in Rule 8011.
Vehicle Movement:
o Limit the speed of vehicles traveling on uncontrolled unpaved access/haul roads within constructions sites to a maximum of 15 miles per hour.
o Post speed limit signs that meet state and federal Department of Transportation standards at each construction site’s uncontrolled unpaved access/haul road entrance. At a minimum, speed limit signs shall be posted at least every 500 feet and shall be readable in both directions of travel along uncontrolled unpaved access/haul roads. o To control wind generated fugitive dust, outdoor construction, excavation, extraction, and other earth moving activities that disturb the soil shall cease whenever the visible dust emissions exceeds 20 percent opacity.
Demolition Activities
o Apply sufficient water to building exterior surfaces, unpaved surface areas where equipment will operate, and razed building materials to limit the visible dust emissions to 20 percent opacity throughout the duration of razing and demolition activities. o Apply sufficient dust suppressants to unpaved surface areas within 100 feet where materials from razing or demolition activities will fall in order to limit the visible dust emissions to 20 percent opacity.
EXHIBIT 1
769
o Apply sufficient dust suppressants to unpaved surface areas where wrecking or hauling equipment will be operated in order to limit the visible dust emissions to 20 percent opacity. o Handling, storage, and transport of bulk materials on-site or off-site resulting from the demolition of buildings shall comply with the requirements specified in Rule 8031 (Bulk Materials).
o Apply water within one hour of demolition to unpaved surfaces within 100 feet of the demolished structure.
o Prevent and remove carryout or trackout on paved public access roads from demolition operations in accordance with Rule 8041 (Carryout and Trackout).
Mitigation Measure AIR-1b: The City shall implement the following mitigation measures listed below to reduce ozone precursor (NO
X and ROG) emissions from off-road equipment, where appropriate. • Use of alternative fueled or catalyst equipped diesel construction equipment; • Minimize idling time (e.g., 10 minute maximum);
• Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty equipment and/or the amount of equipment in use; • Replace fossil-fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not run via a portable generator set); and
• Implement activity management (e.g., rescheduling activities to reduce short-term impacts).
Mitigation Measure AIR-2 : The WTP shall be designed so that each piece of equipment operates in compliance with applicable SJVAPCD permit requirements and regulations including the Authority to Construct and the Permit to Operate. The equipment used, particularly the pumps and diesel generators, shall be operated as per the SJVAPCD permit requirements and regulations.
EXHIBIT 1
770
VI. NOISE
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant with
Mitigation Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact
Impact Analysis Questions
(Table 3.7-4 of the
certified DWSP Program
EIR):
NOISE-1: Construction of
DWSP facilities could
temporarily increase noise
levels at sensitive
receptors.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
NOISE-2: Operation of the
intake facility and WTP
could increase noise levels
at nearby sensitive
receptors.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Sensitive Receptors
Some land uses are considered more sensitive to ambient noise levels than others, sensitivity being a function of noise exposure (in term of both exposure duration and insulation from noise) and the types of activities involved. Noise-sensitive land uses (NSLUs) are generally defined as locations where people reside or where the presence of unwanted sound could adversely affect the use of the land. Noise- sensitive land uses typically include residences, hospitals, schools, daycare facilities, transient lodging, libraries, and certain types of recreational uses. NSLUs in the vicinity of the Project site include two single-family residences located adjacent to the southern boundary of the site and one single-family residence located east of N. Lower Sacramento Road approximately 500 feet east of the Project site.
Noise Metrics
All noise-level and sound-level values presented herein are expressed in terms of decibels (dB), with A weighting, abbreviated “dBA,” to approximate the hearing sensitivity of humans. Time averaged noise levels of one hour are expressed by the symbol “L
EQ” unless a different time period is specified.
Maximum noise levels are expressed by the symbol “LMAX.” Some of the data also may be presented as octave-band-filtered and/or A-octave band-filtered data, which are a series of sound spectra centered on each stated frequency, with half of the bandwidth above and half of the bandwidth below, the stated frequency. These data are typically used for machinery noise analysis and barrier-effectiveness calculations. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is a 24-hour average, where noise levels during the evening hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. have an added five dBA weighting, and sound levels during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. have an added 10 dBA weighting. This is similar to the Day Night sound level (L
DN), which is a 24-hour average with an added 10 dBA weighting on the same nighttime hours but no added weighting on the evening hours.
Because decibels are logarithmic units, SPL cannot be added or subtracted through standard arithmetic.
Under the decibel scale, a doubling of sound energy corresponds to a three dBA increase. In other EXHIBIT 1
771
words, when two identical sources are each producing sound of the same loudness, the resulting sound level at a given distance would be three dBA higher than from one source under the same conditions.
For example, if one automobile produces an SPL of 70 dBA when it passes an observer, two cars passing simultaneously would not produce 140 dBA—rather, they would combine to produce 73 dBA. Under the decibel scale, three sources of equal loudness together produce a sound level five dBA louder than one source.
Under controlled conditions in an acoustic laboratory, the trained, healthy human ear is able to discern 1 dBA changes in sound levels, when exposed to steady, single-frequency (“pure-tone”) signals in the mid-frequency (1,000 Hertz [Hz]–8,000 Hz) range. In typical noisy environments, changes in noise of 1 to 2 dBA are generally not perceptible. It is widely accepted, however, that people begin to detect sound level increases of three dB in typical noisy environments. Further, a five dBA increase is generally perceived as a distinctly noticeable increase, and a 10 dBA increase is generally perceived as a doubling of loudness.
Vibration Metrics
Ground-borne vibration consists of rapidly fluctuating motions or waves transmitted through the ground with an average motion of zero. Sources of ground-borne vibrations include natural phenomena and anthropogenic causes (e.g., explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction equipment). Vibration sources may be continuous (e.g., factory machinery) or transient (e.g., explosions). Peak particle velocity (PPV) is commonly used to quantify vibration amplitude. The PPV, with units of inches per second (in/sec), is defined as the maximum instantaneous positive or negative peak of the vibration wave.
Regulatory Setting
San Joaquin County
Section 9-404.060(a), Additional Regulations for Specific Activities, of the San Joaquin County Development Code limits general construction noise to weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pre- construction activities, including loading and unloading, deliveries, truck idling, backup beeps, and radios, also are limited to these construction noise hours. Additionally, no noise-producing construction activities shall be permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays unless a temporary waiver is granted by the Building Official.
Section 9-404.040(b), Noise Limits, of the San Joaquin County Development Code states that proposed Projects that will create new stationary noise sources or expand existing stationary noise sources shall be required to mitigate the noise levels from these sources, so as not to exceed the noise level standards specified in Table 9-404.040, Part II (See Table 2, on the following page) for the specified noise sensitive land uses:
EXHIBIT 1
772
Table 2
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NOISE EXPOSURE FOR NOISE-SENSITIVE LAND USES PART II: STATIONARY NOISE SOURCES
Sound Level
Outdoor Activity Areas of Noise Sensitive Land Uses
Daytime1
(7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.)
Nighttime2
(10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m.)
Hourly equivalent sound level (LEQ), dB3 55 45
Maximum sound level (LMAX), dB 75 65
Source: County 2024a
1 Where the location of outdoor activity areas is unknown or is not applicable, the noise standard shall be applied at the property line of the receiving land use. When determining the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures, the standards shall be applied on the receiving side of noise barriers or other property line noise mitigation measures. 2 Each of the noise level standards specified shall be reduced by 5 dB for impulsive noise, single tone noise, or noise consisting primarily of speech or music.
3 If the noise source operates for less than 30 minutes per hour, then the maximum sound level standard shall apply.
City of Stockton
Section 8.20, Noise Regulations, of the City of Stockton Code of Ordinances provides performance standards in order to prevent unnecessary, offensive, or excessive noise levels within the City. Section
8.20.030(A), General Noise Regulations, provides standards which shall be considered in determining whether a violation of noise regulations consists of (but is not limited to) considerations such as the nature of the noise (usual or unusual), the proximity of the noise to residential sleeping facilities, the duration, the intensity, and the time of day or night the noise occurs.
Section 16.60, Noise Standards, of the City of Stockton Development Code establishes standards to protect the health, safety, and welfare of those living and working in the City. Municipal Code Section
16.60.030(A) prohibits operating or causing the operation of tools or equipment on private property used in alteration, construction, demolition, drilling, or repair work between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., so that the sound creates a noise disturbance across a residential property line. Section
16.60.040(B)(2)(c) states that public facility land uses adjacent to any NSLU shall comply with the performance standards contained in Table 3-7 Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure for Noise-Sensitive Land Uses – Part II: Land Use-Related Noise Standard (See Table 3) below:
Table 3
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NOISE EXPOSURE FOR NOISE-SENSITIVE LAND USES PART II: LAND USE-RELATED NOISE STANDARD
Noise Level Descriptor
Outdoor Activity Areas
Day
(7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.)
Night
(10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m.)
Hourly equivalent sound level (LEQ), dB 55 45
Maximum sound level (LMAX), dB 75 65
Source: City 2025
Summary of Impacts from the Stockton Delta Water Supply Project Program EIR Noise impacts are discussed in Section 3.7, Noise, of the certified DWSP Program EIR. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities could temporarily increase noise EXHIBIT 1
773
levels at sensitive receptors above the County noise standards; however, the impact from construction of the WTP was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure Noise-1a through Noise-1e. Additionally, operation of the WTP could increase noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors; however, the impact was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure Noise-2.
Although the City-owned WTP site is outside of the City limits, the analysis of noise impacts from construction and operation of the WTP contained in the certified DWSP Program EIR included both City and County noise regulations.
Impact Analysis
The impact analysis questions related to noise are included in Table 3.7-4, Summary of Impacts – Noise, in Section 3.7, Noise, of the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact Noise-1: Construction of DWSP facilities could temporarily increase noise levels at sensitive receptors.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that construction of the DWSP facilities could temporarily increase noise levels at sensitive receptors; however, the impact for construction of the WTP would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOISE-1a through NOISE-1e.
Construction of the proposed Project is anticipated to begin May of 2025 and be completed in June 2026. It is anticipated that construction of the three groundwater recharge basins would occur concurrently. The City-owned Project site would be constructed immediately east of the City’s existing DWTP in a primarily rural area of the unincorporated County. As summarized in Regulatory Setting above, the County Development Code limits general construction noise to weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., and the City Code of Ordinances prohibits operating or causing the operation of tools or equipment on private property used in alteration, construction, demolition, drilling, or repair work between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., so that the sound creates a noise disturbance across a residential property line. The Project would be consistent with both the City’s and County’s noise regulations and implement Mitigation Measure NOISE-1a, which would limit construction noise to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Mitigation Measure NOISE-1a, as identified in the certified DWSP Program EIR, limited construction noise to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; however, this mitigation measure is revised in this IS/Addendum in order to be consistent with both the City’s and County’s noise regulations.
Per the Project engineer, debris and vegetation from site preparation and soil from basin excavation would be stockpiled on-site. No off-site export of debris, vegetation, or soil would be required.
Approximately 219 CY of aggregate would be imported during underground utilities and 500 CY of concrete and aggregate would be imported during basin and berm construction, per the Project engineer. Additionally, per the Project engineer, 296 CY of AC/AB would be imported during paving and 140 CY of crushed rock would be imported during construction of the percolation wells. The nearest NSLUs to the proposed stockpile areas include a residence located approximately 350 feet to the south, a church located approximately 1,200 feet to the southeast, a residence located approximately 1,300 feet to the southeast, and a residence located approximately 1,900 feet to the east. However, the proposed Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure NOISE-1b identified in the certified DWSP Program EIR, which would require the Project contractor to select staging areas as far as EXHIBIT 1
774
reasonably feasible from existing residences and to limit activities within the temporary staging areas to the hours specified in Mitigation Measure NOISE-1a. Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOISE-1a and 1-b would reduce construction-related noise impacts on NSLUs to a less-than-significant level.
Although construction noise would be temporary and short-term and would adhere to the construction hours specified in Mitigation Measure NOISE-1a, construction of Project components may temporarily increase noise levels at the NSLUs described above. The proposed Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure NOISE-1c, which would require the contractor to maintain construction equipment with the manufacturers’ specified noise muffling devices, as well as Mitigation Measure NOISE-1d, which would require the Project contractor to place stationary noise-generating construction equipment as far as reasonably feasible from NSLUs or in an orientation that minimizes noise impacts.
Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOISE-1c and NOISE-1d would further reduce construction- related noise impacts on NSLUs to a less-than-significant level.
As discussed above, Mitigation Measures NOISE-1a through NOISE-1d identified in the certified DWSP Program EIR would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented to reduce construction-related impacts to a less-than-significant level. Mitigation Measure Noise-1e would not be applicable to the proposed Project, as the Project site is located in a primarily rural area of the County and would not require hauling or construction routes through residential areas. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures NOISE-1a through NOISE-1d, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Impact Noise-2: Operation of the WTP could increase noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors.
No New or Substantially More Severe Impact. The certified DWSP Program EIR concluded that operation of the WTP could increase noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors above the County noise standards; however, the impact was determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOISE-2.
Long-term operation of the proposed groundwater recharge basins would involve a “drying out” period of 30 days over the year for each groundwater recharge basin. “Drying out” periods would be staggered for the three groundwater recharge basins so that recharge could be conducted throughout the year.
These periods could also be used to conduct any other maintenance requirements including clearing out the infiltration pipelines, removal of vegetation that occurs, etc. Operation of the proposed Project would also include infrequent educational visits from local public or private schools, organizations, other interested groups, etc. as allowed by the DWTP facility management. It is anticipated that educational visits would be limited to one school bus per visit (up to 72 students, per standard school bus sizes) and would occur between typical daytime school hours and operational hours of the DWTP.
Although operation of the proposed Project is not anticipated to substantially increase ambient noise levels, several NSLUs are located in the vicinity of the Project site, including two single-family residences located adjacent to the southern boundary of the site and one single-family residence located east of N.
Lower Sacramento Road approximately 500 feet east of the Project site. Operation of the proposed Project may increase noise levels at these nearby sensitive receptors. However, Mitigation Measure NOISE-2, as identified in the certified DWSP Program EIR, would remain applicable to the proposed Project and would be implemented to reduce operation-related impacts to a less-than-significant level.
Mitigation Measure NOISE-2 would require that stationary noise sources be designed to ensure that EXHIBIT 1
775
noise levels at the property line do not exceed 70 dBA during Project operation. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOISE-2, and there would be no new or substantially more severe impact compared to what was evaluated in the certified DWSP Program EIR.
Mitigation Measures
The certified DWSP Program EIR identified Mitigation Measures NOISE-1a through NOISE-1e and NOISE- 2 to mitigate impacts related to noise from implementation of the WTP. However, Mitigation Measure Noise-1e would not be applicable to the proposed Project, as the Project site is located in a primarily rural area of the County and would not require hauling or construction routes through residential areas.