EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT A STATEMENT OF WORK1. Project ObjectivesThe City requiring the contractor to perform construction management andinspection including the following:Construction managementFull time inspectionCoordinate with Municipal Utilities Department staffCoordinate with regulatory agenciesAssist with environmental monitor per CEQA requirementsThe objective is to achieve project quality, schedule and costs goals while maintaining compliance with environmental and regulatory requirements throughout the construction. 2. Major DeliverablesAttend and facilitate kickoff and planning meetingsProvide constructability review of final plans and specificationsReview project schedule and identify risksProvide document control supportReview work zone safety and traffic PlansReview CEQA mitigation monitoring planImplement a Construction Management PlanPerform full-time on-site inspection and quality assuranceTrack and document submittals RFIs, change ordersTrack and document contractor progressPrepare daily inspection reports with photographyCoordinate with City staff, contractors, regulatory agenciesMonitor safety and certified payrollsOversee material testing and geotechnical supportProvide lab test results and QA/QC documentationConduct biweekly status and coordination meetingsMaintain cost control and monitor schedule performanceCoordinate SCADA installation and integration supportCoordinate and verify as-built/record drawingsSupport startup and commissioning of systemsManage punch list completion and final inspectionReview and recommend for approval final progress payment EXHIBIT 1
Verify delivery of training documentation and O&M manualsConfirm compliance with CEQA mitigation commitmentsPrepare and submit closeout documentationSee Attachment A (Technical Proposal for: Construction Management Services) for details of each task. 3. Internal and External Standards and GuidelinesThe Contractor is required to be knowledgeable of construction industrystandards, codes and practices.4. NoticesPursuant to Exhibit C – General Terms and Conditions, Paragraph 15 – Notices,the mailing address for all required notices is as follows:Contractor: Inferrera Construction ManagementCity: City of StocktonAttn: Jeffrey Inferrera Attn: City Manager 7040 Settlers Trail 425 N. El Dorado StreetShingle Springs, CA 95682 Stockton, CA 952025. Key PersonnelDanny Trejo – Program Manager IIIDelta Water Treatment Plant11373 N Lower Sacramento RdStockton, Ca 9524210. Option to Renew.n/a EXHIBIT 1
ICM
EXHIBIT 1
May 29, 2025 City of Stockton Attn: Orlathai Chanachai-Chum 425 N. El Dorado St. Stockton, CA 95202 [email protected] RE: RFP PUR 25-037 Construction Management Services Part 1 Technical Proposal Groundwater Recharge Basin ProjectDear Ms. Chanachai-Chum: Inferrera Construction Management, Inc. (ICM) is excited to present you with our proposal for construction management and inspection services for the City’s important Design Build Groundwater Recharge Basin Project. ICM will perform the services and adhere to the requirements described in PUR 25-037 and Addendum 1 dated May 21, 2025 with additional information presented in the Scope of Services section of our proposal as well as exceptions noted in Attachment H. The proposal opening date is May 29, 2025 at 2 p.m. The contact information for ICM’s authorized representative is as follows:Jeffrey Inferrera, PE, President7040 Settlers Trail, Shingle Springs, CA 95682 Phone #: 916-792-9871 Email: [email protected] Our office location and mailing address is as follows: Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc.7040 Settlers Trail, Shingle Springs, CA 95682 ICM is a firm experienced in managing and inspecting your type of project. Since our founding in 2005, we have specialized in our niche market of providing third party construction management and inspection services for public agencies for only the following types of projects: Water Treatment PlantsWater Storage FacilitiesWastewater Treatment PlantsPump StationsDistribution and Collection systems for Water, Recycled Water, and SewerOur proposal contains information on our proposed construction manager, Jeffrey Inferrera, PE. He is experienced managing water projects such as the Groundwater Recharge Basin Project. Our EXHIBIT 1
proposal also contains information on our proposed inspector, Matt Livingston, ICC, who has worked with Jeffrey on numerous projects including our recently completed SRWA Design Build Water Treatment Plant. ICM has one of the largest groups of professionals specialized solely on water and wastewater projects in Northern California. Our proposal also provides information on the rest of our staffwhich totals 23 construction managers, inspectors, and administrators solely dedicated to water and wastewater public works projects. Included under separate cover is our Cost/Price Proposal with those of our subconsultants, Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc., Bay Area Coating Consultants, Inc., and American River Environmental. ICM complies with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) Prevailing Wage requirements. Our DIR number is: 1000036717. Our subconsultants also comply with DIR requirements. We acknowledge receipt of Addendum 1 dated May 21, 2025. This proposal and all its contents, including the fee proposal, are valid for a period of 120 days. Executive Summary – Advantages to Selecting ICM To summarize our proposal and indicate the advantage of selecting ICM and our project team, we first look at ICM. It is a firm that is dedicated, since its founding in 2005, to providing local public works agencies with specialized construction management and inspection for their water and wastewater systems. We do not offer design services and have no conflict of interest with any designer. We do not offer services for Caltrans, City curb and gutter work, hospitals or schools. We only do water and wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, and pipelines. That means you get a firm that is intensely focused on your type of project. It’s what we do. Another advantage of selecting ICM is that we have the largest (or one of the largest) group of professionals in Northern California solely dedicated to water and wastewater construction management and inspection. We have 23 professionals in the Stockton area that are only doing water and wastewater construction management and inspection. The advantage to the City is your team will be local and have plenty of experienced resources. Being a small firm, having a single owner, ICM can and will commit to having the same construction manager and inspector for the duration of your Project. In regards ICM’s team, the core of our team is our construction manager, Jeffrey Inferrera, PE, and our inspector, Matt Livingston, ICC. Jeffrey has an outstanding track record in the industry, formerly working as a field engineer for Black and Veatch and vice president of HDR Engineering, until opening ICM in 2005. In a bigger firm, Jeffrey would be a principal-in-charge who you would only see at the interview. But with ICM, you have the advantage to have this top notch construction manager for the entirety of your project.
EXHIBIT 1
Matt has been a successful inspector for over 20 years. He is very experienced in large earth moving projects having started his career in soil compaction testing. He continued his career with ICM working on large earth moving projects as well as treatment plants. The advantage to the City is having an inspector that is a perfect fit for the Project. Our core team is experienced working together. Jeffrey and Matt have worked on the StanislausRegional Water Authority (SRWA) treatment plant, SRWA pump station, Manteca Digesters, and Ceres Tank projects together. Whether pump stations, treatment plants, or earthwork, Jeffrey and Matt have worked together. This provides the City with a seamless team. Our core team has design build experience. Jeffrey has his DBIA pending, with design build experience at the SRWA water treatment plant, Manteca Atherton Pump Station, and some design build projects from earlier in his career. Matt just completed being the full-time inspector at the SRWA water treatment plant design build project for 3.5 years. Our core team knows how to function within a design build team. We know how to lead the project team, keep it progressing, and protect the City’s interests. This means that the City will gain the benefit of our knowledge as we are able to be proactive and avoid issues before they become problems. ICM and our staff are well known in the industry for building winning teams and bringing projects to success. Thank you for reviewing our proposal. We are ready to join your team now and look forward to helping you on this very important Project. If you have questions or comments, please call me at 916-792-9871.Sincerely, Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc.Jeffrey Inferrera, PEPresident EXHIBIT 1
1. Firm IntroductionFor many yearsa. Background and General InformationInferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. (ICM) is a California corporation and wasfounded by Jeffrey Inferrera in 2005 to provide local districts, cities, counties, and agenciesspecialized third party construction management and inspection services for their water andwastewater projects. Early in his career, Jeff was mentored in construction management andconstruction claims by some of the best construction managers in the business while working tenyears for Black and Veatch. His projects included hard bid construction of water and wastewatertreatment plants and included large national and international projects. Moving to California in 1999, Jeff joined HDR Engineering and quickly became a recognized leader in construction management, holding HDR Design Build Inc.'s Class A Contractors license, being promoted to Vice President, and becoming involved with the Design Build Institute, American Construction Inspectors Association and the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee. Jeff's dedication to client service, precision to the details that make a successful project, and commitment to a flat organizational structure propelled him to start ICM. For the City’s Groundwater Recharge Basin Project, we propose Jeff Inferrera as the Construction Manager. He will provide unparalleled experience in all facets of the project.But Jeff is not alone, ICM has experienced construction management and inspection staff that provides added depth of resources for this Project. Since its founding, Jeff has hired engineers and inspectors with a strong background in water and wastewater and with a drive for excellence. Many of our inspectors are certified and have worked in the water and wastewater business for over 20 years. Together they have successfully completed the construction management and inspection of 42 treatment plant projects, 28 pump stationprojects and over 90 pipeline projects. ICM’s Authorized Person: Jeffrey Inferrera is President of Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. and is authorized to negotiate contract terms and make binding agreements.
Jeff in 72” Transmission Pipe
EXHIBIT 1
ICM’s Office Locations: Main Office: 7040 Settlers TrailShingle Springs, CA 95682 Field Offices: 5588 Sly Park Road Pollock Pines, CA 95726 114 Town Center Blvd El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 b. ServicesICM manages roughly $40 million dollars of water and wastewater construction projects for itspublic agency clients throughout Northern California annually. Following is the General Scope of Services that ICM provides: ConstructionManagementResidentEngineeringContractAdministrationInspectionSpecial InspectionDocument ControlConstructabilityReviewBid SupportStartup SupportSchedule ReviewCost EstimatingClaims MitigationTraining EXHIBIT 1
c. Management ApproachDesign Build ApproachICM’s approach to Design Build is first and foremost to foster a team approach to achieving the Owner’s goal. We become a reliable advisor to the Owner to support the project and align the Design Builder’s team with the Owner’s goals. For the City’s Project, we assist the Project team to achieve the following: Complete an excellent facility that meets the needs of the City and the community.Meet the schedule deadlines.Meet the grant agency and CEQA requirements.By using a high degree of cooperation and collaboration, Design Build procurement system is an effective means to meet the Owner’s objectives and guard the public’s interests. Construction Oversight Approach ICM's construction oversight approach is to adopt a partnering attitude with all of the team members. As a pure third-party construction management firm, we want everyone to win. But our first priority is to protect the interests of the City. We want the City to have a winning project, recognizing that we work for you. We will protect your interests before anyone else and keep the City up to date on the status of the project. In addition, ICM’s construction manager and inspector will keep the City’s project manager informed on a daily basis on project details. We want the Design-Builder to have a winning project. As such, we will have great communication with them and anticipate their work so that we can discuss any issues that might be coming in the future. We will let them know if they are falling behind on construction or paperwork and give them priorities, so they stay on track. And if we see potential issues, we will discuss to avoid issues before they affect the project. At ICM, we are a third-party CM firm that does not provide design services, so we have no conflict of interest. On the contrary, we wantdesigners to look good so that they are motivated to do a good job for the City. The Design Builder’s presentation of the look ahead schedules at weekly progress meetings are instrumental to keeping key project players informed on upcoming work so that issues can be expeditiously resolved. With ICM, we have the leadership, technical, and facilitative skills to bring the Project to success. Our areas of expertise include the following: Construction methodsRisk allocationEnvironmental sensitivityPermit complianceInnovationSafe work practicesStakeholder/public facilitationIntegrated project deliveryConflict awareness and resolution EXHIBIT 1
Quality Assurance Approach For this Project, Gateway Pacific is providing a construction management and will be responsible to inspect their own work, like on any project. ICM’s role is to verify that they are successfully implementing their quality control plan and provide owner-lead inspection. An approximate ten percent verification of material testing will provide a basis to determine that Gateway Pacific’s quality control plan is being effective. If not, we would recommend modification to the their testing protocol to obtain the quality construction required. We can also increase the quantity of QA testing to determine if there are systemic quality issues. Photographic documentation is crucial. For daily photographs, we routinely take 40 or moreproject photographs a day. Taking many photos has a big effect on the Design-Builder and it is our opinion that taking large quantities of daily photographs probably is the single most effective way for the field crews to do higher quality work and prevent claims. Documentation of the location and configuration of underground utilities is important for the Operation and Maintenance staff. We suggest the City consider one of the following two approaches to document underground utilities at the treatment plant prior to them being backfilled:GIS documentation of all underground utilities. This would require the use of GPS surveyequipment and an operator.Photographic documentation via drone camera. Using a drone camera, with all photographsbeing taken at the same elevation, a composite of photographs can be created to show theentire underground utility system at the site.This would be in addition to the Design Builder providing as-built drawings.
EXHIBIT 1
d. ICM Project ExamplesICM has worked on over a hundred water and wastewater projects over the past 20 years. Below we list projects that we have successfully completed that have similar components as the Groundwater Recharge Basin Project.Earthwork and BasinsSRWA WTP Sludge Basins – Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager, Matt Livingstonwas the inspector. Four new percolation basins for process sludge.SRWA WTP Retention Basins – Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager, MattLivingston was the inspector. Three new percolation basins for stormwater.Ione WWTP Basins – Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager. Rehabilitation of 5percolation basins for tertiary water.Manteca WWTP EQ Tank – Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager. New 10 acrebasin serving as an equalization reservoir.Manteca WWTP Industrial Basin – Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager. New 3acre percolation basin for tertiary water.San Juan Water District Hinkle Reservoir – Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager.Rehabilitation of a 13 acre basin.Wells and DrillingSRWA Pump Station – Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager, Matt Livingston wasthe inspector. ixteen horizontal well infiltration gallery.Yuba City WTP – Groundwater Well No. 2EID Sly Park Intertie - Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager. Anode well.Manteca WWTP – Jeff Inferrera was the construction manager, Matt Livingston was theinspector. Drilling rock filled piers under digestersGolden State Water Tank – Groundwater WellCommunity Park ProjectsModesto Virginia Corridor – Jeff Inferrerawas the construction manager. New park with paths,play structures.Ceres Smyrna Park – Jeff Inferrera was theconstruction manager, Matt Livingston was theinspector. Park improvements with shade structures,paths, parking.Treatment Plants and Pump StationsWe have successfully completed more than 70 treatment plant and pump station projects. Almost all of them included pipelines internal to the plants, equipment replacements, and SCADA integration. Some of these plant projects are list below.
Matt Livingston was the Inspector forthe Ceres Smyrna Park Project EXHIBIT 1
SRWA Water Treatment Plant, Hughson, CA $240 Million Completed with NO claimsThe Project consisted of a new 15 MGD treatment plant with build out capacity of 45 MGD and 7 miles of mortar coated and line steel pipe. System components included sludge basins, stormwater basins, flocculation; sedimentation; ozonation; filters; chlorine disinfection; clearwell; pumping station; residuals handling facility; chemical storage and feed equipment; SCADA,instrumentation and controls; and site civil improvements.ICM provided constructability review, bidding support, construction management, inspection, and document control services. Our services included inspection of construction materials and methods; monthly updates; change order review and processing; claims mitigation; and processing RFIs, submittals, and progress payments. Manteca WQCF Expansion and Improvements Projects, Manteca, CA $100 Million (over five contracts)Completed with NO claims1The Manteca WQCF Phase Expansion and Improvements Projects consisted of increasing the wastewater plant capacity from 7 MGD to 20 MGD and other improvements. The projects included a new influent pump station, bar screens, grit tanks, sedimentation basins, aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, foul air biofilter, solids handling building with centrifuges, new digesters, secondary filtration system, UV system, Title 22 water distribution, CNG facility, food waste/FOG receiving station, lined treatment ponds, new 17Kv electrical system, new SCADA system, new CMMS system, new administration building, new laboratory, maintenance building and employee locker building. ICM provided construction management (change orders, weekly meetings, schedule review, progress payments, monthly reports, claims mitigation), contract administration (document control, meeting minutes), inspection (civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, I&C), testing (soils, concrete, welding, coatings), and startup support. Post-construction phase services consisted of coordination with the design engineer for the finalization of record drawings and preparation of the construction completion report. Based on the success of the project, the City of Manteca was awarded the CWEA “Plant of the Year” award.Note 1: For these project examples, we define “claims” as those claims that rise to the level of dispute that the claim resolution is processed by attorneys.
ICM has provided CM services for the City of Manteca’s Water Quality Control Facility Expansion Projects Continuously for 13-years SRWA Water Treatment Plant completed in 2024
EXHIBIT 1
Design Build of the Atherton Booster Pump Station, City of Manteca, CA $5.6 Million Completed with NO claimsThe Atherton Booster Pump Station and Tank Project was a design/build projectconsisting of a new 3.6 million-gallon steel tank, five 150-hp vertical turbine pumps, motor control center, SCADA, emergency generator, masonry building, yard piping, valves, electrical, detention basin, perimeter wall, and paving. ICM provided constructability review, bidding support, construction management, inspection, and document control services. Our services included inspection of construction materials and methods; monthly updates for City managers; change order review and processing; claims mitigation; and processing RFIs, submittals, and progress payments. Jenny Lind Water Treatment Filter Addition, Calaveras County Water District, CA $3.2 Million Completed with NO claimsThe Jenny Lind Water Treatment Plant is a 5-MGD plant that treats surface water from the Calaveras River. The Jenny Lind Water Treatment Plant Filter Expansion Project increases the plant capacity to 6-MGD. The project consisted of adding a 700-gpm filter and 2,000-square foot of floor area to an existing treatment building, installing a solids thickener and sludge collector equipment, and upgrading instrumentation and control systems.ICM provided construction management and inspection services including resident engineering, inspection of construction materials and methods, specialty inspection, change order review, progress payments, monthly updates for the District, document control, and claims avoidance.
Jenny Lind Water Treatment Plant
Potable Water Tank
EXHIBIT 1
Peterson 100 MGD Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation, San Juan Water District, CA$6.0 Million Completed with NO claimsThis project included the replacement of flocculation equipment, replacement of sludge collection equipment, construction of new concrete settled water conveyance channel and overflow structure, redwood baffle wall additions and replacements, and improvements to sedimentation basin launder column anchorage. ICM provided construction management and inspection services including resident engineering, inspection of construction materials and methods, specialty inspection, change order review, progress payments, monthly updates for the District, document control, and claims avoidance.Treated Water Pipeline and Cooperative Transmission Bypass Pipeline Improvement Project, San Juan Water District, CA $4 MillionCompleted with NO claimsThis San Juan Water District Project included the installation of 72 inch, 60 inch, 30 inch, and 24 inch pipelines interconnected to the District’s main lines within the Peterson Treatment Plant and in the distribution system. Also included is the construction of a new chemical feed vault, sample pipelines, valves, corrosion protection. Trenching consisted of open and shored trenches, blasting, and dewatering. ICM Group, Inc. provided inspection, construction management, and document control for the duration of the project. Services included inspection of construction materials and methods, coordination with treatment plant personnel, monthly updates for City managers, change order review and processing, claims mitigation, partnering, processing RFIs and submittals, and progress payments.
Flocculation Basin
72-inch pipeline at SJWD WTP
EXHIBIT 1
40” Transmission Pipeline Rehabilitation Project, San Juan Water District, CA $1.5 Million Completed with NO claimsThe Fair Oaks 40-inch transmission pipeline is a two-mile long conveyance pipeline which transports water from the District to the Fair Oaks water system. This project consisted of welding all unwelded internal joints, closure plates, repair plates, installation of a 42-inch inline butterfly valve, installation of a new 15’ long pipe section, mortar demolition and spot repair, and disinfection. ICM provided inspection of all internal pipeline work including verification of weldments, quantities of mortar removed and repaired. ICM provided construction management for progress payments, weekly meetings, and change orders. Inspection included torque testing of pipe flange bolts, welding inspection, leak testing, and compliance with contract specifications and manufacturers installation requirements.Design Build Operations Headquarters Building, Calaveras County Water District, CA $2.4 Million Completed with NO claimsThis project consisted of the design and construction of a 14,000 square foot Operations Headquarters Building for the Calaveras County Water District. Design considerations included public access to lobby and customer service areas, board room, engineering workspace, operation, and maintenance offices. This design build project was completed as a lump sum contract and had no change orders or increased cost above the lump sum price. ICM Group, Inc. provided conceptual design services, constructability review, bidding support, construction management, document control, and full-time inspection by a certified inspector. Included in our services was daily inspection, photographic documentation of work progress, progress payment review, RFI review, submittal review, technical support, schedule review, and claims mitigation measures. Material testing and ICC inspection was provided by Neil O. Anderson and Associates.
Neighborhood Location of Pipeline
CCWD HQ Building
EXHIBIT 1
e. Public AgenciesAt ICM we have many repeat clients. Clients want us to work on their projects because of theexperienced and high caliber resident engineers and inspectors on our staff. Currently, we have four licensed engineers, twelve inspectors, and one document controller on staff. All are dedicated exclusively to water and wastewater public works projects. Tony Barela, PE, Operation Manager for the San Juan Water District provided this reference: “Jeff Inferrera and the ICM staff have worked for six years on five very complex projects for the District. With them on the District team, our projects were completed on time, on budget and, of utmost importance, no claim. We are thrilled to work with them. In my opinion, their experience, professionalism, attention to detail, and excellent communication skills is the reason for their success.” Jason DeGroot, PE, Senior Engineer (formerly with the City of Manteca Public Works Department but now with Central Contra Costa Sanitary District) provided the following reference:“I have had the pleasure of working with ICM Group for six years. ICM has provided outstanding construction management and inspection services at the Manteca WWTP on four very large and complex plant improvement projects. ICM has provided detailed and thorough inspection on our projects, always professional and highly knowledgeable on all aspects of construction. Consequently, we have had no claims on over $75 million of construction.” ICM keeps projects on track. An example of this was when the Calaveras County Water District (CCWD) had an emergency project to expand the Jenny Lind Treatment Plant capacity. This project was a complicated expansion requiring multiple plant shutdowns and intense coordination with plant staff. The project was completed early, on budget, and with no claims. Since then, ICM has successfully completed three other District projects and trained District staff in constructionmanagement methodology. Bill Perley, Utility Director (now retired) for CCWD states:“ICM does an outstanding job. We’ve had a lot of CM firms working at the District. ICM’ s the only one I trust.” With ICM on your side, you can expect a quality project, completed on budget, on time, and with no claims or end of project issues. ICM staff are trained using our in-house training program. In addition, our staff is encouraged to obtain inspection certification through the American Construction Inspectors Association. Ourinspectors know what to look for on treatment plant, pump station and pipeline projects and we know how to keep projects on track.
EXHIBIT 1
Our public agency clients include the following: Client List and Their FacilitiesCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District4838 City of Manteca7220City of Folsom737 City of Ceres492 City of Roseville1451 City of Davis661City of Ione5 2City of Modesto2182City of Yuba City696Citrus Heights Water District678 Calaveras County Water District175 Delta Diablo Sanitation District2002 El Dorado Irrigation District10033Groveland Community Services District5 2 Golden State Water Company2556 Nevada County<981 Sacramento County Water Agency554 Sacramento Suburban Water District1732 San Juan Water District1608 Stanislaus Regional Water Authority1002 Town of Discovery Bay131 Tuolumne Utilities District442 Turlock Irrigation District1103 Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District1243 EXHIBIT 1
f. ICM’s StaffOur staff resource chart is presented below: ICMResources ChartCA Licensed Engineer Construction ManagementTreatment Plant InspectionPump Station Inspection Pipeline Inspection Civil InspectionStructural InspectionMechanical InspectionElectrical InspectionCoatings InspectionOSHA 10 Hour Safety Confined Space Years at ICMYears’ExperiencePrinciple / Project Manager / Construction Manager / Inspector Jeffrey Inferrera, PE19 34 Construction Manager / Inspectors Augustine Inferrera, PE 2 4Kyle Drury, PE 5 10 Ricardo Bedoy, PE 10 36 Inspectors Akil Barris, ICC 1 16 Chris Inferrera, EIT, ICC 6 13 Daniel Waymire 2 21 Don Kurosaka, PE 6 37 Gary Fish1 35 George Guorgui 1 21 John Inferrera, EIT 1 1Joe Saylor3 28 Keith DeLapp, B. Sc. Arch. Eng.7 32Matt Livingston, ICC 10 26 Paul Lopez 14 30 Richard Baker1 38 Roman Gary, MS 1 1Scott Ahlstrom 3 35 Sam Zeitulaev, ICC 1 3Spencer Roundtree3 32 Thomas Gomes 9 35 Document Control / Administration Colleen Inferrera 6 7Elena Inferrera 2 2 EXHIBIT 1
g. ReferencesBelow are our references for the projects listed as Project Examples:Client Reference #1 Mr. Chris Fisher, PEStanislaus Regional Water Authority(209) 205-8799, @turlock.ca.usSRWA Water Treatment PlantClient Reference #2 Mr. Phil Govea, Department Manager (formerly Assistant Dep. Director in Manteca) (209) 883-Manteca WQCF ProjectClient Reference #3 Mr. Jason DeGroot, PE Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (formerly of the City of Manteca)(925) 229-7209, [email protected] WQCF ProjectClient Reference #4 Mr. Tony Barela, Senior Engineer San Juan Water District (916) 791-6939, [email protected] Juan Water District Projects Client Reference #5 Mr. Bret Swain, Senior Civil Engineer Town of Moraga (formerly of the City of Manteca) (925) 888-7025, [email protected] Client Reference #6 Mr. Bill Calaveras County Water District (209) 768-6203, [email protected] County Projects EXHIBIT 1
2. Project UnderstandingGroundwater Recharge and HabitatWhen completed, the Groundwater Recharge Basin Project will be an important part of the City’s water supply and community. The vision to create a wildlife habitat and community ecological space while replenishing the City’s groundwater supply was a marvelous idea. We, at ICM, would be very happy to be a part of the City’s team to make this Project a success. We have reviewed, in whole or in part, the available project documentation which includes the following: Request For ProposalAddendum 1Preliminary Scope Validation Memo, Nexgen, 2025Project Schedule, Gateway Pacific, 2024Draft Program EIR (two volumes), ESA, 2005Final EID, ESA, 2005Preliminary Design and Estimate of Probable Costs, Geosyntec Consultants, 2023Feasibility Study (two volumes), Geosyntec Consultants, 2023The Project is located at the Delta Water Treatment Plant, 11373 N. Lower Sacramento Road in Lodi. Geosyntec estimated the Project cost to be in the range of $14 million. The City has contracted with Gateway Pacific Contractors as Design Builder. Gateway Pacific has teamed with NexGenEngineering as their designer. We understand that Helix Environmental Planning is completed the CEQA which goes to City Council in June or July 2025. Currently under design, groundbreaking is scheduled to start approximately August 1, 2025. Project Completion is scheduled for approximately July 31, 2026. The Project consists of the construction of three groundwater recharge basins and raw water diversion structures, piping systems, dry wells, fencing, SCADA integration, and a visitor area. It also includes the following: Site grading and earthwork for recharge basinsInstallation of percolation dry wells and diversion pipingFencing, gates, and new site access Pipeline installation in the berm betweenpercolation basins – Ione WWTP EXHIBIT 1
Visitor center, shade structure, paths, signage, and restroomsSCADA and instrumentation installation and integrationStartup, testing, and commissioning of recharge facilitiesEnvironmental mitigation, habitat sensitive landscaping (mitigate at Tuolumne River)There are long lead items presented in the schedule for early procurements consisting of Steel Pipe and Valves. Please note that the new 500 HP VFD may also have a long lead time. It is our understand that the City is looking for ICM to perform construction management and inspection including the following: Construction managementFull time inspectionWork with City managementCoordinate with Plant staffCoordinate with regulatory agenciesAssist with environmental monitor perCEQA requirementsEngage with publicDetailed tasks are outlined in the Scope of Services presented in this Proposal. The objective is to achieve Project quality, schedule and costs goals while maintaining compliance with environmental and regulatory requirements throughout the construction. Per Addendum 1, the Design Builder will perform the material testing. However, ICM will be available to assist and double check results. We have included budget for Youngdahl Consulting Group to take QA samples for material testing, Bay Area Coatings to double check coatings if needed, and American River Environmental to double check SWPPP requirements are being met. We have not included a surveyor to double check grades which we should discuss if it is necessary.
Verify if the 500 HP VFD is a long lead item
ICM did the CM/inspection of theRehab of 5 percolation basins – Ione WWTP EXHIBIT 1
3. Scope of ServicesFor many yearsWe understand the requirements of the Scope of Services presented in Sections 2.0 and 2.1 of the Request For Proposal. ICM will meet the requirements of the RFP’s Scope of Services as discussed below. The following are the best practices our firm will use in providing the proposed services. 2.1.1 Pre-Construction PhaseAttend and facilitate kickoff and planning meetingsICM can provide an agenda, conduct the meetings and provide meeting notes.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonProvide constructability review of final plans and specificationsICM's review of the Design/Builder’s plans and specifications will include the following:A review of the plans to provide advice if the construction proposed is constructable withthe site conditions. Typical items we look for are space, access and load constraints.A review of the specifications to provide advice as to the general construction materialsused for backfill, material testing requirements,and facility startup and testing procedures.We do not provide a detailed review betweenplans and specifications to find inconsistenciesor contradictions between different parts of theContract. However, if we notice any, we willprovide comments.We do not perform calculations to verifyappropriateness of design parameters. However,if we notice a feature of work that looksuncommon based on our experience, or unsafe,we will provide comments. A review of "front ends" and Division 0 specifications is not applicable to this Project but if there are any that the Owner wished reviewed, we will review them to provide advice on how to minimize or mitigate potential management and general contractual issues.We do not perform a design review, or a review of specifications for technical merit. We do not review life cycle items but if we notice something we will provide comments.The constructability review will not check design parameters presented in the plans, specifications, or reports. Our review will not transfer the risk of design errors or omissions to ICM, in whole or in part. ICM is not the designer and will not be performing design services.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt Livingston ICM has completed over 40 treatment plant projects. This is an aerial of the Manteca Wastewater Treatment Plant, ICM’s first project which started in 2004.
EXHIBIT 1
Review project schedule and identify risks.ICM will review the schedule and verify that it meets contract requirements, meets projectmilestones, blackout windows, and identify logic errors. We will also look for ways toimprove the schedule like early procurement of the 500 hp VFD.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonProvide document control support.ICM is flexible to use the project team’spreferred document control system thatbest supports the needs of the Project. Werecommend using Procore or similar non-proprietary document managementsystem. We are experienced with Procore,Sharepoint, Synology DAS, EADOC,GoCanvas, and PIMS.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and ElenaInferreraReview work zone safety and trafficplans (per Addendum 1)No exception taken.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and MattLivingstonReview CEQA mitigation monitoring planHelix should be reviewing the CEQA mitigation monitoring plan. ICM will assist with thereview.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt Livingston2.1.2 Construction Phase Implement a Construction Management Plan.No exception taken. Please see QA/QC Matrix at the end of this Section.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonPerform full-time on-site inspection and quality assurance.We propose having Matt Livingston as our full time inspector. He will be supplemented byAkil Barris, our ICC electrical inspector for electrical and SCADA inspection. He will alsobe assisted by Roman Gary who will provide as built and Clerk of the Works type ofservices.ICM Staff: Matt Livingston full-time, Akil Barris as needed, Roman Gary as neededTrack and document submittals, RFIs, change ordersNo exception taken.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Roman Gary Jeff was the CM for the Peterson WTP FLOC/SED
EXHIBIT 1
Track and document contractor progress No exception taken. ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonPrepare daily inspection reports with photography No exception taken. ICM Staff: Matt LivingstonCoordinate with City staff, contractors, regulatory agencies.We understand that we will be “hands on” with working with the Plants Operation and Maintenance staff, who want to make sure they have no plant upsets and planning is done thoroughly and early. We will help the City Fire Department who will want to verify hydrants and the fire system is to their standards. We will also assist with other regulatory agencies as needed. We can meet via Project Teams as appropriate.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonMonitor safety, DBE compliance, and certified payrolls (per Addendum 1)ICM’s inspector will note safety deficiencies to the contractor and City. Addendum 1 states that certified payroll will need to be reviewed if requested by DIR. This is highly unlikely. However, if the DIR is requesting review of certified payroll, it will need to be reviewedby a labor compliance company like Cummings Group. ICM can subcontract to Cummings Group for these services if they are needed but this has not been budgeted. ICM Staff: Matt LivingstonOversee material testing and geotechnical support We understand, per Addendum 1, the Design Building will perform the material testing. However, we have provided a limited budget for Youngdahl to perform material testing QA and geotechnical support, if required. ICM Staff: Matt LivingstonProvide lab test results and QA/QC documentation No exception taken. ICM Staff: Matt LivingstonConduct biweekly status and coordination meetings We recommend weekly progress meetings in person with Teams capability.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt Livingston Jeff was the CM and Matt the inspector on this excavation using soil freezing - SRWA EXHIBIT 1
Maintain cost control and monitor schedule performanceJeff will notify the City of potential cost impacts and will provide a monthly project statusreport. Good communication is important to keep on track and prevent surprises.ICM Staff: Jeff InferreraCoordinate SCADA installation and integration supportJeff will take the lead to assist with SCADA coordination and prove out. This needs to startearly.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Akil BarrisOther ServicesSWPPP – The Design Builder will be responsible for SWPPP. ICM’s subconsultant,American River Environmental, will provide QA inspections if needed.FAT testing – ICM is available to go to FAT testing for the VFD, if desired.Biological monitoring and training – Per Addendum 1, Helix Environmental is performingthe biological monitoring. We assume they will do training also. ICM will assist as needed.2.1.3 Post-Construction Phase Coordinate and verify as-built/record drawings.To be done by Design Builder but checked by ICMICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Roman GarySupport startup and commissioning of systemsJeff will work with the Design Builder to coordinatewith the Plant.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonManage punchlist completion and finalinspectionNo exception taken.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonReview and recommend for approval finalprogress paymentNo exception taken.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonVerify delivery of training documentation and O&M manualsNo exception taken.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Roman Gary Jeff was the CM and Matt the inspector on 7 miles of 42” steel pipe - SRWA EXHIBIT 1
Confirm compliance with CEQA mitigation commitmentsICM will work with Helix to confirm CEQA compliance.ICM Staff: Jeff Inferrera and Matt LivingstonPrepare and submit closeout documentation Project Completion Report – No exceptions taken. Final Environmental Mitigation Report – Helix is performing this. Notice of Completion – ICM will provide for City’s review and signatureICM Staff: Jeff InferreraOther ServicesCMMS – ICM recommends the Design Building provide CMMS data sheets. Warranty – If the Design Builder does not provide a warranty schedule, ICM can provide one to the City.
Jeff was the CM for the Lined Basin and the Percolation Basin shown in this photo - Manteca EXHIBIT 1
A typical Design Build QA/QC matrix is presented below. We recommend reviewing this matrix with the Design Builder and verifying responsibilities at the start of our work. Construction Quality Control and Assurance Responsibility Matrix TaskDesign-Build Contractor(a) City/ICMPre-Construction Meeting FA Inspection ProceduresF RWeekly Construction Meeting FA Baseline Schedule Meeting FA Monthly Schedule Update Meeting FABaseline Schedule of ValuesF RMonthly Payment Application F R, V Monthly Construction Report F R Tracking Property Owner Coordination and Public ComplaintFPSubmittal Review and ResponseF RRFI ResponseF REarthwork Inspection F P Differing Site Conditions IdentificationFR, V Civil/Sitework InspectionFP Pipeline InspectionFP Concrete & Reinforcement InspectionFP Mechanical & Plumbing InspectionFP Electrical InspectionFP Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) Inspection F P Painting and Coating InspectionFP Building/Structural InspectionF P Materials & Laboratory Testing (i.e. concrete strength, etc.) FP Specialty Inspection F P, R Environmental Construction Monitoring FP Field Witness Testing (i.e. leakage testing, etc.) FP Factory Witness Testing F O Daily Inspection ReportsF RNon-Compliance Notices and ResolutionF P, R, VChange Order/Claims ManagementFR, VStart-Up Meetings F, NA Start-Up InspectionFP Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Trainings F A Acceptance TestingFP Record DocumentsFR, VCommunication & Notifications to the SRWA F--Legend: F = Full Responsibility Periodic:P -- = None N = Admin R = Review A = Attend V = Approve O = Optional EXHIBIT 1
4. Project TeamThe Team Membersa. ICM Organization ChartICM has assembled a highly experienced and qualified group of professionals for the Groundwater Recharge Basin Project. Our team has worked on numerous water treatment plants, pump stations, and pipelines similar to the City’s Project. ICM will not substitute team personnel during the duration of this project; each member of our team will be dedicated to the success of the Project, from start to finish. ICM’s project team is comprised of the following professionals presented in this organizational chart:
Our staff and our subconsultants will be used in a QA role. Jeff will be dedicated to the Project and Matt will be onsite full time. The other staff and subconsultants will assist as needed.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/ TESTING/ STARTUP QA
Jeffrey Inferrera, PE
ELECTRICAL INSPECTION QA
Akil Barris, ICC
Special Inspections QA
Youngdahl – Concrete, Soils, CWIBACC – NACE Certified CoatingsAmerican River Enviro - SWPPP
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION QA
Matt Livingston, ICC
CLERICAL SUPPORT
Roman Gary, MSElena Inferrera
CITY OF STOCKTONPROJECT MANAGER
Travis Small
EXHIBIT 1
b.Overall Project Organization ChartICM will be part of the overall Project team, supporting its members to be successful and using our experience to provide proactive, value added ideas to overcome contractual as well as technical issues. The organization chart below shows our understanding of the key project participants within the City team.OWNER’S OWNER’S CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc.
DESIGNER MANAGER
NexGen
DESIGN-BUILDER
Gateway Pacific
THE OWNER
City of Stockton
EXHIBIT 1
c. Team MembersJeffrey Inferrera, PE, (DBIA pending) – Construction Manager / Testing / Startup QAArea of Expertise:Construction management of water and wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, storage tanks, and pipelines. Education: BS Env. Science and Engineering, Rutgers University MS Environmental Engineering, Cornell University Certifications:California Licensed Civil Engineer, C62190 Registered Construction Inspector, ACIA #5832 DBIA certification pending additional CEUs Experience:Jeff has over 30-years of experience as a construction manager and resident engineer working on large public water and wastewater systems. He is experienced on Design Build projects and with Army Corps Construction Quality Management Procedures. Pertinent projects include the Ione Water Treatment Plant Ponds Project, SRWA Water Treatment Plant Design Build, Manteca Atherton Tank and Pump Station Design Build Project. Utilization:Jeff will work approximately 80 percent part time at the start of the Project and will taper to 40-50 percent part time after two months. Jeff is currently working as part time construction manager on the Sly Park Intertie Project for the El Dorado Irrigation where he has a full-time resident engineer. His utilization on the Sly Park Intertie Project is about 25 percent and is expected to diminish by June 2025. Matt Livingston, ICC – Construction Inspector QAArea of Expertise:QA/QC of all trades, including pump stations, treatment plants, and pipelines. Certifications:ICC Building Inspector, 5232456-10 ACI Level 1 01031459 Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certification 44154 Experience: Mr. Livingston has over 19 years of experience working on construction projects. His experience includes large earthwork projects, treatment plants, pump stations, pipelines, force mains, gravity lines, trenching, jack and bore, roads, working in streets and working with the public. His inspector duties include ensuring work is installed per plans and specifications, documenting work with photographs and daily reports, completing as-built drawings, and coordinating with the design engineer, agencies, and public. He recently completed his role as the Owner’s inspector for over 3 years at the SRWA Water Treatment Plant Design Build Project. Utilization:Matt is dedicated full-time, or as needed, for the Project duration. Matt currently is completing work at the Arden Service Area Project for Sacramento Water Agency.
EXHIBIT 1
Akil Barris, ICC – Electrical Inspector QAArea of Expertise:Special inspection of electrical, fiber optic, instrumentation, and control systems. Certifications:ICC ElectricalExperience: Akil has over 20-years of experience in the trades and 2 years as ICM’s electrical inspector. He is experienced with special inspection at pump stations and treatment plants.Utilization:As needed.Keith De Lapp – Back Up Construction Inspector QAArea of Expertise:QA/QC of all trades, including pump stations, treatment plants, and pipelines. Experience: Mr. De Lapp has over 30 years of experience working on public works construction projects. His experience includes inspection of site civil and earthwork, treatment plants, pump stations, and pipelines. Utilization:As needed.Roman Gary, MS – Clerk of the WorksArea of Expertise: Project document support. Experience: Mr. Gary has been working for ICM for a year. His role has been to assist with compiling RFIs and submittal comments into as-builts, assisting with change order development and review, reporting and schedule review.Utilization:As needed.
EXHIBIT 1
Elena Inferrera – Document System ManagerArea of Expertise: Web based document management system such as Sharepoint and Procore. Experience: Ms. Inferrera provides ICM’s IT support for our clients document systems and general administration assistance. Utilization:As needed.SubconsultantsBay Area Coating Consultants, Inc. (BACC)will provide NACE Certified Coating and LiningInspection Services in an as needed QA role. ICM has worked with BACC for the past 10 yearsmost recently at the SRWA Water Treatment Plant Design Build Project. BACC has been in the coating inspection industry for the past 25-years. BACC is a valuable team member successfullyperforming their scope of work responsibilities to the satisfaction of all team members.Office Location: Bay Area Coating Consultants, Inc. 1119 K StreetModesto, CA 95354 (209) 652-6962Youngdahl Consulting Groupwill provide soils, materials, and special inspection testing services, including compaction testing, concrete, rebar, and welding inspection in an as needed QA role. Youngdahl Associates will also be available for geotechnical review. ICM has worked extensively with Youngdahl at the SRWA Water Treatment Plant Design Build Project. Youngdahl has proven to be a valuable team member successfully performing their scope of work responsibilities to the satisfaction of all team members.Office Location: Youngdahl Consulting Group 1234 Glenhaven Court El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 (916) 933-0633American River Environmental (ARE)will provide SWPPP inspection in an as needed QA role. ICM has worked with the ARE staff for a number years on projects in the Sacramento area. They have a proven record to keep projects in compliance. Office Location:American River Environmental5468 Merchant Circle Placerville, CA 95667 530-391-0853 EXHIBIT 1
Our staff resource chart is presented below: ICMResources Chart CA Licensed Engineer Construction ManagementTreatment Plant InspectionPump Station Inspection Pipeline Inspection Civil Inspection Structural InspectionMechanical InspectionElectrical InspectionCoatings InspectionOSHA 10 Hour Safety Confined Space Years at ICMYears’ExperiencePrinciple / Project Manager / Construction Manager / InspectorJeffrey Inferrera, PE 19 34 Construction Manager / Inspectors Augustine Inferrera, PE 2 4Kyle Drury, PE 5 10 Ricardo Bedoy, PE 10 36 Inspectors Akil Barris, ICC 1 16 Chris Inferrera, EIT, ICC 6 13 Daniel Waymire 2 21 Don Kurosaka, PE 6 37 Gary Fish1 35 George Guorgui 1 21 John Inferrera, EIT 1 1Joe Saylor 3 28 Keith DeLapp, B. Sc. Arch. Eng.7 32 Matt Livingston, ICC 10 26 Paul Lopez 14 30 Richard Baker1 38Roman Gary, MS 1 1Scott Ahlstrom 3 35 Sam Zeitulaev, ICC 1 3Spencer Roundtree 3 32 Thomas Gomes 9 35 Document Control / Administration Colleen Inferrera 6 7Elena Inferrera 2 2 EXHIBIT 1
d. Summary of Team ExperienceIn summary we add the following to specifically address some features of Stockton’s Project as follows: Water treatment plants, pump stations and pipeline construction projectsJeff Inferrera – Jeff has performed construction management on thirteen treatment plants, of which six were water treatment plants. He performed construction management on nine pump stations of which three were water pump stations. He performed construction management and inspection on over 30 pipeline projects of which about half were water force mains. He has completed three design build projects while with ICM. Matt Livingston - Matt has performed inspection on two treatment plants. He performed inspection on six pump stations. He performed inspection on over 20 pipeline projects of which about half were water force mains. He has completed one design build project while with ICM. Working Together – Jeff and Matt has been working together for 9 years and have worked on fiveprojects together. Integrated project deliveryJeff Inferrera has worked on all project delivery methods, including design build, and on all size of projects including $240 million SRWA water treatment plant design build, $100 million of treatment plant work at the City of Manteca, a $100 million treatment plant expansion at the City of Las Vegas, and $400 million Boca Baracas Treatment Plant and Flood Control Project in Buenos Aires, Argentina. He has been involved with the Design Build Institute of America (DBIA), Engineers Joint Contract Document Committee (EJCDC), is experienced and knowledgeable in construction law, construction claims, and coming up with win-win-win solutions when the contracts do not adequately address the project issues that need to be resolved. Project management information toolsElena Inferrera and Romany Gary take the lead in our company to manage the project information tools and provides training to ICM staff on new tools. Currently, ICM is experienced at using Procore, SharePoint, Synology, EADOC, and Primavera construction software including P6. Fostering and maintaining cooperative atmosphereJeff maintains a a great partnering-type of relationship with all the team players, building a high powered team of professionals. Being a team leader, he has very successful projects. In the field, Matt Livingston maintains excellent working relationships with superintendents, foremen of each trade, Plant staff, and agencies. His steady vigilance prevents many issues from becoming worse and keeps a positive attitude that we all fed off of.
EXHIBIT 1
Construction industry standards and codesThe ICM team is knowledgeable of construction industry standards, codes and practices. We have been doing treatment plant construction, the most complex public works projects, for decades. Jeff Inferrera is a Professional Engineer and Registered Construction Inspector and Matt Livingston is an ICC certified inspector.Environmental (CEQA)The ICM team is experienced with the Project’s CEQA requirements based on our experience at the SRWA Pump Station Project as well as other treatment plant and pipeline projects with similar requirements. Regulatory agenciesThe ICM team is experienced with coordinating with the Project’s regulatory agencies based on our experience at the SRWA Pump Station Project as well as other treatment plant and pipeline projects with similar requirements. Project close outThe ICM team has closed out numerous Design Build and design bid build projects and is experienced with training, acceptance testing, startup, prove out, Punch List, warranty, substantial completion and final completion paperwork including release of retention.
EXHIBIT 1
QualificationsRegistrations:Professional Civil Engineer, California No. 62190 Registered Construction Inspector (Division 1) ACIA, No. 5832DBIA, pendingEducation:MS, EnvironmentalEngineering, Cornell University, 1991BS, cum laude, Environmental Science and Engineering, Mr. Inferrera has more than 35 years of experience in the wastewater and water industry with emphasis in construction management, resident engineering, and inspection. He specializes in wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, and pipelines.Regional Surface Water Supply Design Build Project, Stanislaus Regional Water Authority Provided construction management for a new $240 million 15 MGD treatment plant and 7 miles of 42” and 30" pipeline. Final capacity will be 45 MGD. System components included pre-oxidation with permanganate; flash mixing; flocculation; sedimentation; ozonation; GAC/sand filters; chlorine disinfection; clear well; pumping station; residuals handling facility; chemical storage and feed equipment; corrosion control; cybersecurity provisions; power supply and emergency generator power; I&Cs; administration, operation, maintenance, and laboratory facilities; and site civil improvements.Treatment Plant Expansion and Improvement Projects, City of Manteca - Construction manager and/or inspector for over $100 million of plant expansion and improvement projects including the following: Nutrient RemovalNew Influent Pump Station.Construction of aeration basins and secondary clarifiers.New 10 mgd tertiary filtration and UV disinfection.New solids handling facility including sludge mixing tank.North Plant Aeration Efficiency Improvements.Two new digesters, rehabilitation of two existing digesters, new digester controlbuilding.RAS/WAS RehabilitationDigester gas fueling facility.Atherton Booster Pump Station/Tank Design Build Project, City of Manteca - Construction manager for the construction of a 5 MGD booster pump station, 3.6 million steel tank, and related electrical, controls, instrumentation, piping, and site civil work. Las Vegas Wastewater Treatment Plant, City of Las Vegas - Resident engineer for plant expansion of city’s water pollution control facility expansion from 66 to 93 mgd. This $105 million expansion program involved 13 separate construction contracts, six separate contractors, and multiple contracts. Facilities involved in this expansion include secondary clarifiers, blower building, primary sedimentation, biological nutrient removal, chlorination/dichlorination, chemical feed facilities, filtration, anaerobic digesters, pumping stations, SCADA, headworks, mechanical dewatering, odor control, and O&M building. Approximately 10,000 lineal feet of pipeline was installed ranging in size from 8 to 120 inches in diameter. WWTF Rehabilitation Project, City of Yuba City - Construction manager for this project which consisted of Digester fixed covers and gas system piping, Bar Screen replacement, structural steel canopy and sludge dewatering screw presses including conveyance system. Major electrical and control improvements included new Motor Control Centers, PLC’s, 12KV transformers, electrical ductbanks, and SCADA integration of five process areas, plus modernization of facility network.
EXHIBIT 1
ReferencesChris Fisher, PEWorking Relationship: Owner for Design Build Treatment Plant Project Municipal Services Director City of Turlock156 S. Broadway Turlock, CA 95380 [email protected] 209-688-5468Phil Govea, PE Working Relationship: Owner for Design Build Project and numerous wastewater treatment plant projects Civil Engineering Department Manager Turlock Irrigation District 333 East Canal Drive Turlock, CA 95381 [email protected] Carrington, PE Working Relationship: Owner for numerous treatment plant, pump station, and pipeline projects Engineering Manager El Dorado Irrigation District 2890 Mosquito Road Placerville, CA 95667 [email protected] Peterson WTP Floc/Sed Rehabilitation Project, San Juan Water District - Resident Engineer and inspector for the rehabilitation of the WTP flocculation systems. The project consists of removal and replacement of five flocculation systems and four sludge collection systems, construction of settled water channel, baffle walls, launders, polymer pumps as well as new MCCs, fiber optics and SCADA upgrades. Oak Avenue Wastewater Lift Station, City of Folsom - Performed resident engineering and inspection of the Oak Avenue Wastewater Pump Station. Station consisted of the construction vactor discharge location, piping, concrete ramp, manhole, and fencing. Mr. Inferrera was responsible for contract administration, inspection, change orders, resolution of contractor conflicts and of technical issues. Lake Forest Lift Station, City of Folsom - Resident Engineer for the demolition of the existing pump station and the construction of a new pump station with wet well, electrical, instruments, pumps, piping, flow meter, associated equipment, and site improvements. Two 15 hp submersible pumps were set at the bottom of a wet well. The pumps discharged to 8inch ductile iron force main and flowed through a magnetic flowmeter. Mr. Inferrera was responsible for contract administration, change orders, resolution of contractor conflicts and of technical issues. Jenny Lind Water Treatment Plant Filter & Solids Handling Project, Valley Springs, CA. - Resident Engineer for the WTP expansion upgrading the plant capacity from 5mgd to 6 mgd. The project consisted of adding a 700-gpm filter and 2,000 sq of floor area to an existing treatment building, installing solids thickener tank and sludge collector equipment, and upgrading instrumentation and controls. Raw Water Pump Station Project, Stanislaus Regional Water District, Construction Manager for a 45,000 gpm (100 cfs) raw water pump station in the levee of the Tuolumne River, east of Modesto. This work included soil freeze excavation shoring and construction of a large pump station within a levee. Site civil work in the flood plain and discharge of high pump station flows in the river made this Project environmentally sensitive. Lift Stations Rehabilitation Project, Delta Diablo - Construction Manager for this project which consisted of rehabilitation of five active and elderly pump stations. All trades were working including piping, pumps, electrical, instrumentation and controls, coatings, concrete, HVAC, and site civil plus critical shut downs and bypass pumping. Ione Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 1 and 2, City of Ione - Resident engineer and inspector for the Phase 1 improvements including new wastewater pipelines interconnecting the wastewater lagoons, new dual wastewater pump station, aeration pond modifications, new aerators, electrical, coatings, vaults, and valves. Phase 2 improvements included the lining of five ponds; 550,000 sq ft of liner. St. Andrew’s Lift Station Upgrade, El Dorado Irrigation District - Resident engineer for the $1 million upgrade of St. Andrew’s Lift Station upgrade project. Construction work includes demolition of the existing electrical/mechanical dry pit, installation of five raw sewage pumps ranging from 3 to 150 hp, installation of a 500 kW generator, miscellaneous valves and piping, and a masonry electrical control building.
EXHIBIT 1
Matthew Livingston, ICCInspector
QualificationsCertifications:ICC Building Inspector, 5232456-10ACI Level 1 01031459Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certification 44154 Mr.Livingston has over 20 years of experience as a construction inspector. His experience includes tunnelling, site civil work, pipelines, force mains, gravity lines, trenching, working in streets and working with the public. His inspector duties include ensuring work is installed per plans and specifications, documenting work with photographs and daily reports, completing as-built drawings, and coordinating with the design engineer, agencies, and public.Water Treatment Plant and Pipeline Project - Stanislaus Regional Water Agency.SRWA's $250 million Regional Surface Water Supply Project consisted in the construction of a new 15 MGD water treatment plant, 7 miles of potable water pipeline to the City of Turlock, 5 miles of potable water pipeline to the City of Ceres, and a 1 mile raw water pipeline from the Tuolumne River Water Intake Pump Station to the treatment plant. Matt was inspector on this 3-year project from start to finish. The pipelines consisted of two potable water force mains made of 30" MCML and 40" MCML steel pipe, and one 48" MCML raw water pipeline. There were six jack and bore tunnels including two under the Santa Fe Railroad and others under EID canals. The treatment plant consisted of rapid mix tanks,flocculation and sedimentation tanks, filter building, chemical building, backwash tank, sludge lagoons, administration building, laboratory, and maintenance building.Arden Service Area Pipe and Meter Installation Project Sacramento County Water Agency. These were three concurrent but separate pipeline projects. The projects included the installation of 6 inch to 12 inch ductile iron pipe and C900 pipe. Each project encompassed about 3 miles of water force main in Sacramento neighborhoods and installation of 100s of meters, plus valves and hydrants. This work also included disinfection inspection.Raw Water Pump Station Project - Stanislaus Regional Water Agency. This was a separate project from the treatment plant and occurred two years prior to the treatment plant. Inspector for a 45,000 gpm(100 cfs) raw water pump station in the levee of the Tuolumne River, near Hughson. This work included soil freeze shoring to a depth of 75 feet that facilitated the excavation and construction of a large pump station within the levee. Site civil work in the flood plain and discharge of high pump station flows in the river made this Project environmentally sensitive.North Trunk Sewer Project Manteca, CA. This project involved the construction of two miles of 48-inch RCP sewer pipe and 12-inch C900 water force main. Matt was the inspector mostly for the micro tunnel portion of the Project. Two micro tunnels were constructed. The first micro tunnel consisted in a 230 foot long, and 30 foot deep, 80-inch micro tunnel under Airport Road. The second micro tunnel consisted in a 375 foot long, and 35 foot deep, 60-inch micro tunnel under Yosemite Boulevard.FEZ South Trunk Sewer Project Manteca, CA. This project involved the construction of two miles of 48-inch RCP sewer pipe and 12-inch C900 water force main. Matt was the inspector mostly for the microtunnel portion of the Project. The micro tunnel consisted in a 500 foot long, and 30 foot deep, 80-inch microtunnel under State Highway 120.
EXHIBIT 1
Matthew Livingston, ICCInspector
SFPUC San Joaquin Eastern Segment Water Pipeline. Civil QA Inspector on a 6.7-mile, 78-inch water pipeline project with a construction cost of $45,000,000. Responsible for QA inspection of rebar & concrete construction for three Valve Vault structures and the Oakdale Portal Protection structure. SFPUC San Joaquin Western Segment Water Pipeline.Civil QA Inspector on an 11-mile, 78-inch water pipeline project with a construction cost of $48,000,000. Responsible for QA inspection of native soil cement placement in the pipe zone & trench backfill. SFPUC Tesla Water Treatment Facility.Civil QA Inspector on design-build project with a construction cost of $84,000,000. Responsible for inspection of concrete, roofing, building inspection of the various building trades, AC paving, and punch list inspections. WQCF Digester Project Manteca, CA. lead inspector for the construction of two digesters, and rehabilitation of two existing digesters including grading, stone column soil densification, underground utilities (gas, electrical, process piping, storm water), reinforced concrete structures, CMU digester control building, 17kv power, instrumentation, controls, CMMS, and SCADA.BART Intermodal Modernization Project - Union City CA.as a Quality Control Manager, provided all inspection work for civil, underground, concrete structures and building trades.Presidio Monterey, General Instruction Building.Provided QC inspection of structural construction. Perform civil and building inspection of general civil works and the various building trades. This was a $42 million project.Deuel Institute, Water Treatment Facility - Tracy CA.Performed civil inspection and testing. Deuel Institute, Reverse Osmosis Facility - Tracy CA.Performed civil inspection and testing throughout entire project. Performed special inspections including epoxy anchors and pull testing. This was a $32million facility.
EXHIBIT 1
Akil Barris, ICCConstruction Inspector
QualificationsCertificates/ RegistrationsICC Mechanical InspectorICC Electrical InspectorOSHA 10/20/40 hr TrainingConfined Space TrainingMr.Barris has more than16 years of experience in the constructionindustry. With one year of experience inspecting, under ICM's tutelage, Mr. Barris has become an outstanding public works inspector. Hisemphasis is in water and wastewater pipelines and services.Arden Service Area Pipe & Meter Installation Phases 1B, 3, & 4,5,6 Project Sacramento County Water AgencyMr. Barris was the construction inspector for this potable water pipeline and meter project. The combined construction value of all three phases is $117 million. The three phases of the Project are as follows:Phase 1B: 1/2 mile of 8" pipe, 4 miles of 10" pipe, 1/2 mile of 12" pipe, 1 mile of 16" pipe, and 299 meters.Phase 3: 5 miles of 8" pipe, 1/2 mile of 10" pipe, 1 mile of 12" pipe and 618 meters.Phase 4,5,6: 12 miles of 8" pipe, 1/2 mile of 10" pipe, 3 miles of 12" pipe and 1,423 meters.The construction of the 35 miles of water mains and 2,919 meters installations included fire hydrants, backflow preventers, appurtenances, disinfection, and tie ins. Also included was inspection of pipe installation, lateral tie ins, bedding, backfill, shoring, and traffic control.Prior Construction Project Experience Mr. Barris has worked as a project manager and a tradesman on multiple water projects including pipeline installation, bore pit construction, water tankconstruction, valve installation, and construction of concrete vaults. His wastewater construction experience includes pipeline installation, manhole installation, manhole rehabilitation, CCTV and cleaning of sewer pipes.
EXHIBIT 1
QualificationsEducation:B.S., ArchitecturalEngineering, CaliforniaPolytechnic StateUniversity, San LuisObispo, 1988Mr. De Lapp has more than 30 years of experience in construction and engineering with emphasis in field engineering, construction observation, and design. His experience includes pumps stations, water systems, wastewater treatment plants, and pipelines.Pump Station Rehabilitation Project – Antioch, CAConstruction manager and inspector for Delta Diablo Sanitation District’s project to rehabilitate five pump stations. Work included all trades including site civil work to protect facilities from floods, concrete rehabilitation, new piping, new pumps, new electrical and I&C, HVAC, building construction. Digester Improvements Project – Manteca, CA Construction manager and inspector for the construction of two digesters and rehabilitation of two digesters. Work included pumps, piping, concrete structures, welding, electrical, I&C.PG&E Kings River Powerhouse PRV and Controls Rehabilitation–Fresno County, CAConstruction manager for the first ever rehabilitation and maintenance of the pressure reducing valve (PRV) for the 52-MW hydroelectric turbine in operation since 1962. The refurbishment included the following: PRV removal and transportation to machine shopComplete PRV disassembly and cleaningRecordation of all as-found measurementsRefurbishment of numerous bushings, the plunger seat ring and the dash potReplacement of pilot valve and plunger seats with custom machined partsPRV Reassembly and transportation to powerhousePRV Installation and startup and testingMr. De Lapp coordinated all material procurement, prepared all RFI’s and submittals, and provided on-site supervisorial oversight in the powerhouse and machine shop during critical activities resulting in the successful startup and testing prior to the client’s scheduled return to service date.Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Facility – Los Angeles, CAConstruction manager for the $2.7 million subcontract for the manufacture of 38,000-square feet of architectural precast concrete wall panels for the 5-story laboratory and adjacent power buildings. Project responsibilities included the following:Daily quality control inspection of epoxy coated reinforcement and 316L stainless steelconnection embedment placementProduction of shop drawingsProcurement of all materialsTransportation planning for precast concrete panels from Northern California plant to the projectsiteDevelopment of comprehensive rigging and erection plan utilizing a 165-ton conventional craneMr. De Lapp personally supervised all precast concrete panel erection activities, including welding.
EXHIBIT 1
Lighthouse Marina Pump Station–Sacramento County, CA An underground open system concrete storm drain pump station featuring two 250 and two 350-horsepower pumps and gravity out-fall. Field engineer responsible for installation of subsurface drainage system developed to mitigate settlement of adjacent structures caused by construction dewatering. Lakeside Pump Station – Sacramento County, CA An underground closed system concrete storm drain pump station featuring three 125-horsepower pumps. Field engineer responsible for installation of subsurface drainage system developed to mitigate settlement of adjacent structures caused by construction dewatering. Sump Pump 160 – Sacramento County, CA An underground closed system concrete storm drain pump station featuring two400 and two 600-horsepower pumps. Field engineer responsible for installation of subsurface drainage system developed to mitigate settlement of adjacent structures caused by construction dewatering. PG&E Spaulding Powerhouse #1–Nevada County, CA Led the effort for this Engineer-Procure-Construct (EPC) project requiring the replacement of two 100-year old 48-inch diameter Butterfly Guard Valves and replacement of the pressure reducing valve (PRV) discharge horn liners. In addition to design, responsibilities included construction observation of activities which included extensive piping disassembly/reassembly, drill-and-bond anchoring and grouting of the replacement stainless steel discharge horn liners and monitoring of strain gage instrumentation deployed to monitor steel stresses in the 48-inch diameter 100-year old penstock flanges during torqueing of bolts. NID Bowman Lake Dam Emergency Penstock Repair–Nevada County, CA Led the effort to develop the emergency repair of a 78-inch diameter penstock bifurcated at the toe of the dam into two 42-inch diameter conduits terminating at a valve house serving as a low level outlet. The penstock was discovered to have cracked and was leaking due to a transient event caused by operational error of a butterfly valve. Repair included demolition of the existing bifurcation and valve house; grouting and anchoring a 66-inch diameter sleeve extending inside the existing 78-inch conduit 3 ½ diameters upstream of the tunnel portal; and design of a thrust block anchored with 8– -inch diameter rock anchors. In addition to design, responsibilities included construction observation during the entire five-month long construction period. PG&E Lake Valley Pipeline Replacement–Nevada County, CA Led the effort for this Engineer-Procure-Construct (EPC) project requiring the replacement of 1,150-feet of 15-inch diameter straight seam welded steel pipe on a 30-degree slope supported by concrete anchor blocks rock-bolted to available underlying rock. In addition to design, responsibilities included construction observation. SFW&PA Miners Ranch Canal Condition Assessment – Butte County, CA Led the effort for this “walkdown” inspection and condition assessment (CA) of the Miners Ranch Canal (MRC) which was constructed in 1967. The conveyance is comprised of a series of gunite canals, composite gunite bench flumes, two sections of metal flume, two under creek siphons, three sand traps and two sections of corrugated metal pipe conduit with an overall length (excluding siphons) of 33,981 feet. The results of the “walkdown” and CA identified that the vertical wall panel concrete is experiencing the effects of advanced Carbonation as evidenced by reduced pH values. FEM Analysis of the CBF was performed to determine the factor of safety associated with the design basis earthquake load case. Risks associated with CBF remaining life and panel replacement alternatives were presented.
EXHIBIT 1
QualificationsCertifications: ProCore EADoc P6 Confined Space Training OSHA / 10 Hr Ms. Inferrera provides project controls, document management, and numerous project support duties on all ICM projects.Project Administration and Controls on the following projects:Arden Phases 1B, 3, 4, 5, 6 – Sacramento County Water AgencySmyrna Park – City of Ceres– City of CeresHinkle Cover and Liner – San Juan Water District- - - – Roseville – City of RosevilleEmergency - Motherlode - Flume 47A - – Stanislaus Regional Water AuthorityValley Vista – – – City of Folsom- Central Contra Costa SanitaryCentral San Pleasant Hill - Central Contra Costa Sanitary– – Folsom Oak Ave – City of FolsomReservoir 1 - – - Bacon Genset – San Juan Water District– City of Ceres– City of Ceres– - Sacramento County Water Agency– - Central Contra Costa Sanitary District– EXHIBIT 1
QSD/QSP Services (Qualified Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Developer and Practitioner Services) Resume ofJohn R. Brenner Education , Internet Based Bachelors of Science, Environmental Management, 2012 to Current, Folsom, CA Associate of Arts, General Education, 2007, Sacramento, CA Elementary Surveying, May 2008, Shingle Springs, CA Diploma, May 2001Certifications #25335#8056 #3051 Proficiencies Adobe Acrobat, AutoCAD, Carlson Civil Suite, Excel, Word, Power Point, SMARTS, and SWIM Employment History , American River Environmental, January 2025 Present Conduct day-to-day business activities including client and agency coordination, scheduling,accounting, human relations, and general company operations.Train, schedule, and manage employees.Manage Sacramento and foothill area projects for SWPPP development and inspections., BTConsulting, Inc., August 2010 June 2025 Coordinate day-to-day business activities including client and agency coordination, scheduling,information technology, and general company operations.Employee coordination, management, and training.Schedule and manage field crews, including Bay Area, Sacramento, and foothill areas.Prepare SWPPPs, WPCPs, Erosion and Sediment Control Drawings, and other relateddocuments.Develop and maintain CAD standards.Present tailgate training and represent BTC at project pre-construction meetings.Manage SMARTS uploads and QA/QC for documents ready to be uploaded to the State., State of Nevada, November 2010 January 2012 Monitor correctional facilities and ensure order and security through strict monitoring of inmateactivities.Search prisons and other facilities for banned material, fire and safety hazards, and unsanitaryconditions.Record daily activities, disturbances, and illegal activities.
EXHIBIT 1
Michael R. Kelley CertificationsInternational Code Council (I.C.C.) Reinforced ConcreteStructural MasonryStructural Steel and BoltingStructural WeldingMaster of Special InspectionAmerican Concrete Institute (A.C.I.) Concrete Field Testing Technician Grade IMasonry Field TestingAmerican Welding Society (AWS) Certified Welding Inspector (CWI)California Division of the State Architect (DSA) Masonry Special InspectorYoungdahl Consulting Group Ultrasonic Testing (UT) Level 1Floor Flatness (FF/FL)Experience Folsom Dam Auxiliary Spillway, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Folsom Observed concrete, masonry, and aggregate placement, sampled material, conducted laboratory testing of soils, concrete, and aggregates, and provided construction quality assurance for the construction of an auxiliary spillway, including the installation of a submerged gates, a 3,000 foot long spillway, and a 1,000 foot long approach channel. Central Valley Community Outpatient Clinic, Stockton Provided services to the United State Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for the 158,000 square foot Central Valley Community Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) in Stockton/French Camp. This new facility is part of the effort to relocate services before the decommissioning of the VA Livermore Campus. Services included concrete testing, welding inspection, non-destructive testing, and testing and inspection of the lightweight concrete used on the roof of the structure. Beale AFB DCGS Operations Facility, Swinerton Builders, Yuba County Performed the responsibilities of lead masonry special inspector, observed concrete, masonry, and anchor epoxy placement, shop and field welding, sampled material, performed torque testing of high strength bolts, and verified compliance of reinforcing steel for the new 85,000 sq ft concrete tilt-up building, equipment pads, a cooling tower, and site improvements including underground utility installations and pavement construction. California Highway Patrol New Area Office, Department of General Services, Chico Performed the responsibilities of lead masonry special inspector, observed concrete placement, shop and field welding, sampled material, performed special inspection of high strength bolts, rebar placement, load testing of post-installed anchors, and verified compliance of reinforcing steel of 5 acre law-enforcement facility including three single-story steel framed buildings of up to 31,000 sq ft, a 120 foot communication tower, an emergency generator, parking canopies with photovoltaic panels, a fueling station, and pavements.
Career Background Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc. Field Supervisor 2020-Present Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc. Senior Special Inspector 2003 2020 Delta Drywall Labor Supervisor 2000 2001 Figueroa Landscape Architects Assistant 1999 2000 HomeBase Customer Assistant 1999 EXHIBIT 1
Ed DarrimonPresident
Bayareacoating.com(888)384-6839
NACE No. 106NACE Certified Level III(40 years of Industry Experience)CAREER SUMMARYEd formed B.A.C.C. in 1987 and has 42 years of experience in the Coatings & Linings Field. Ed has completed thousands of projects in the past 42 years.Ed administers the daily operations and provides high performance technical coating and lining specifications, failure analysis, surveys, and technical consulting in the water and wastewater industry. Ed Darrimon started his career (1976) with East Bay Municipal Utility District for eleven years in the Engineering & Maintenance Departments as supervising coating specialist. Mr. Darrimon designed and developed the the Districts Rehabilitation program of 170 reservoirs, water treatment plants, and two hydroelectric plants including penstocks.ACCOMPLISHMENTS STEEL STRUCTURES PAINTING COUNCIL: (S.S.P.C.) * National Board of Directors from 1988-92 (Pittsburg PA). Re-elected in1992-96 to serve second four-year term.* National award 1989 for Outstanding Chairman award.* Past President and Founder of the first S.S.P.C. chapter in the U.S.A andwhich has won the most chapter awards since 1986.* Member of numerous committees, Education, Lead Removal, Urethane,Zinc, Epoxy, and Inspection.NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CORROSION ENGINEERS: (N.A.C.E).*Past Chairperson / Bay Area SectionNACE Certified Level III Inspector #106AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION: (A.W.W.A)* Committee Member National D-100, 103, 104, 106, 108, & 102 StandardsCommittee approval (35+ Years -present)* Cal/NV Corrosion Committee. * Cal/NV past Vice Chairman MaintenanceCommittee.Mr. Darrimon has presented numerous talks to the following Organizations:A.W.W.A., N.A.C.E., & S.S.P.C. on the following topics: * Tank linings, 100%solids technology using epoxies and polyurethanes, Tank inspection,Specifications, Abrasive blasting, & Dehumidification use. Ed has publishedarticles for the National Association of Corrosion Engineers on 100% solidsusage, technology, and performance. Published author in MaterialPerformance on tank linings.Current Projects:Zone 7 Water Agency (2021)- Numerous new and rehabilitation projects over the past eighteen years, including specifications, inspection, and consulting on a 3.7 MG. interior and exterior of a carbon steel reservoir. A new 5.0 MG. carbon steel EQ tank. East Bay Municipal Utility District - Providing inspection, specification assistance,consulting the past ten years with a current annual contract. Presently working on two 12.0MG. potable water reservoirs. This includes the rehabilitation oftheinteriors and exteriors.Santa Clara Valley Water District (2020)Rehabilitation of a 4.0 MG. carbon steel back wash tank. Consulting, inspection, and EXHIBIT 1
8.0 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTSConstruction Management ServicesPUR 25-037SUBMITTAL DUE: THURSDAY, May 29, 2025 AT 2:00 PMRFP Submittal Electronic [email protected] Proponent Business NameProponent Contact Name Proponent AddressProponent Phone NumberProponent Email AddressDepartment of Industrial Relations ID Number (if applicable)Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc.Jeffrey Inferrera(916) [email protected] 7040 Settlers Trail, Shingle Springs CA 956821000036717 EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1
ATTACHMENT G - SUBCONTRACTOR LISTPUR 25-037 PLEASE LIST BELOW ALL SUBCONTRACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK Each bidder shall give the name, business address, license number, description of the work, and the dollar amount to be PAID the subcontractor, for each subcontractor that will be used on the project, if the Bidder is awarded the contract. Only subcontractors with work in excess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) or $10,000 (whichever is greater) of the Bidder's total bid need to be listed. All work in excess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) or $10,000 (whichever is greater) of the Bidder's total bid, for which a subcontractor is not listed on this form, shall be performed by the Bidder's own organization. Additional numbered pages listing proposed subcontractors may be attached to this page. Each page shall be headed "Proposed Subcontractors" and shall be signed by the Bidder. PRINT LEGIBLY OR TYPE BUSINESS NAME/ADDRESSCONTACTPHONE NUMBER LICENSE NUMBER & LICENSE CLASSIFICATIONTYPE OF WORK AMOUNT Bay Area Coating Consultants, Inc.Scott YoungdahlAmerican River EnvironmentalAustin Darrimon(661) 873-3601N.A.Coating Inspection$5,000John Brenner(530) 391-0853N.A.SWPPP Inspection$5,000Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc.N.A.Material Testing $10,000(916) 933-0633 EXHIBIT 1
ATTACHMENT H - EXCEPTIONS PUR 25-037 EXHIBIT 1ICM takes exception to the indemnity clause in the Sample Contract Paragraph 13 which states (emphasis added). 13. Indemnity and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify City of Stockton and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, costs (including without limitation costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Contractor's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this agreement, except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City of Stockton. Maybe this paragraph is meant for Contractors and not appropriate for professional services (consultants). The issue with the highlighted text is that ICM will be involved in so many aspects of the Construction but we do not control the design, materials, means, methods, schedule, quality or safety which is the Contractor's responsibility. Having ICM indemnify “all liability” of “every nature” in connection with the Project makes our liability almost unlimited and dependent on the actions of others which appears that it could create an unfair liability due to the Contractor's failures. Our other clients have the following language in their consultant agreements (emphasis added) as follows: El Dorado Irrigation District - A current Agreement To the fullest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, California Civil Code Section 2782), Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless District and its officers, and employees (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against all claims, loss, cost, damage, injury expense and liability (including court costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, litigation expenses and fees of expert consultants and/or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation) but only to the extent that any of the above are actually caused by, any negligent or reckless act or omission, or willful misconduct, of Consultant, any sub-consultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone that they control (collectively “Liabilities”). Sacramento County Water Agency - A current Agreement To the fullest extent permitted by law, for work or services provided under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless AGENCY, its governing Board, officers, directors, officials, and employees (collectively “Indemnified Parties”), from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, and all expenses and costs incidental thereto(collectively “Claims”), including cost of defense, settlement, arbitration, expert fees, and reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting from injuries to or death of any person, including employees of either party hereto, and damage to or destruction of property, or loss of use or reduction in value thereof, including the property of either party hereto, and recovery of monetary losses incurred by AGENCY directly attributable to the performance of CONSULTANT, but only to the extent actually caused by the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, its employees, CONSULTANT's sub-consultants or subcontractors at any tier, or any other party for which CONSULTANT is legally liable under law. City of Roseville - A current Agreement Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of CONSULTANT's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. The same type of indemnification language used by El Dorado Irrigation District, Sacramento County Water Agency, and Roseville, is in our Contract's with the City of Ceres and City of Yuba City. We request your kind consideration to use the language provided by these other cities and agencies for the indemnification clause.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICESFOR THE CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA PUR 25-037 ADDENDUM No. 1 DATE: May 21, 2025 To All Potential Proponents: A. This Addendum shall be considered part of the proposal documents for the above-mentioned project as though it had been issued at the same time and shall be incorporated integrally therewith. Where provisions of the following supplementary data differ from those of the original proposal documents, this Addendum shall govern and take precedence. PROPONENTS MUST SIGN THE ADDENDUM AND SUBMIT IT WITH THEIR PROPOSALS. B. Proponents are hereby notified that they shall make any necessary adjustments in their estimates as a result of this Addendum. It will be construed that each Proponent’s Proposal is submitted with full knowledge of all modifications and supplemental data specified herein. ADDENDUM NUMBER: I. SOLICITATION CHANGES/ QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS: THE CITY’S RESPONSES TO CHANGES ARE SUBMITTED IN BLUE. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 1. Who issues the permit? The City of Stockton or County? If a permit is needed, the City of Stockton will issue it. 2. What company is the design engineer? Nexgen is the design engineer.3. Is the design team using program software? Ex: Sharepoint, one drive, Microsoft teams? Yes, they are using programs such as Sharepoint and Microsoft Teams. 4. Are you looking for a prevailing wage inspector and CM project engineer? A full time CM and an inspector as needed. The City does have inspectors on staff, but will not be available full time. 5. Who is in charge of material testing? Is the consultant(us) required to hire a third party to perform material testing? The contractor, Gateway Pacific, is responsible. 6. How many different fundings are available for this project? The Water Utility is paying for the project. There are grants that have been approved for use for this project. The grants are funded by the State and Federal government. 7. Who takes care of grant reporting? The City of Stockton? The City of Stockton and their consultants will take care of the grant reporting. 8. Is there a timeline for the grants to be used? Yes, grants must be used by 2027.
EXHIBIT 1
9. It is challenging to provide a proposal for the construction management services without understanding the whole scope. Per our job walk meeting on 05-08-2025 at 9:00am. It is paramount that the following documentation is provided: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Please see Exhibit 5A, 5B and 5C. CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Mitigation Measures Please see Exhibit 5A, 5B and 5C.Civil drawings that show the cut and fill of the 3 basins and 3 forebay Not available.The feasibility study done on the basis of design Please see Exhibit 6A, 6B and 6C.The scope of the Design Build contractor (Gateway Pacific Contractors)Please see Exhibit 1 – Validation Memo.As-Built Drawings on how we are to connect to the 54” raw Delta water and 48” Pixley pipeline and how deep underground the pipe is located.Not available.30 percent design drawings and specification Not complete.Without these documentations, proponents can make assumptions that can be erroneous. Please provide information above. 10. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES-page 6 of 29 Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) integration Does the City of Stockton Municipal Utility Department have an in-house SCADA programmer or do they sub-out the programing to a consultant? The City has a SCADA Programmer. Who will be writing the program and sequence of operation to integrate the controls for the valves, flow meters, pressure transducers, etc. The City’s programming contractor. Will there be a third-party commissioning agent separate from the Design Build Contractor that will commission and ensure that the SCADA programming and Ground Water Recharge Basin is commissioned properly per feasibility study? Please advise. No, there will not be a third-party. 11. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES-page 6 of 29 Site grading and earthwork for recharge basins. (Exhibit 1). Exhibit 1 only shows Civil Drawing C010 for one of the basins. Please provide full civil drawings to show calculations of the cut and fill for the project? Not available. Without doing any civil calculations, there will definitely be more cut than fill. Does the City of Stockton plan to stockpile the dirt and keep it in on the property? Or stock pile the dirt and eventually find a home for the dirt for folks that need the dirt? Or send the stock pile to the nearest landfill? Stock pile the dirt, try to find a home for the dirt for folks that need the dirt, if unsuccessful in finding a home, send the stock pile to the nearest landfill. Will the City of Stockton do a soil analysis if the dirt is clean of chemicals for disposal to a landfill? Please advise. Yes, and the City would be responsible for that. 12. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES-page 6 of 29 “Helix Environmental Planning” Paragraph 3.
EXHIBIT 1
• What is Helix Environmental Planning role? Did they write the CEQA, EIR, or biological studies? Please advise. Helix Environmental is writing the addendum to the EIR and are doing the biological studies. 13. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES-page 6 of 29 “Other subconsultants as needed” Paragraph 3. • Per Bid Walk on 05-08-25; will the City of Stockton hold contract for special inspection or will the special inspection be under Gateway Pacific Contractors? It depends on what specific inspection is being referred to. It’s possible that the Construction Manager may be needed to provide inspections. I recommend for the proposal to add an allowance for inspections. • Nexgen Utility Management. Is Nexgen a consultant of the City of Stockton or Gateway Pacific? What is Nexgen’s role? Nexgen is a sub to Gateway Pacific and they are the design engineers. • Will there be a third-party commissioning agent (subconsultant) separate from Gateway Pacific Contractors that will commission the project per feasibility study standards? Please advise. There isn’t a third-party agent. 14. 2.1.1 Pre-Construction Phase-page 6 of 29 Assist in the development of work zone safety and traffic plans • Will the CM (construction manager) submit easement permits for the traffic plans to San Joaquin County public works or will this be the responsibility of Gateway Pacific Contractors and the CM review prior to submitting the traffic plan to San Joaquin County? Please advise. If permits are needed to be submitted, Gateway Pacific will be responsible with creating and submitting. The Construction manager will review it. 15. 2.1.2 Construction Phase-page 7 of 29 Monitor safety, Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) compliance, and certified payroll• Is this project funded from U.S. Department of Transportation and Caltrans? Per City of Stockton BidFlash “Disadvantage Business Enterprise website “To receive federal funds from the US Department of Transportation, Caltrans requires the City of Stockton to adopt and maintain a DBE program”. If this project is not funded by the US Department of Transportation and/or Caltrans, why is the CM required to “monitor” DBE compliance? Please advise. The Contractor will not be required to do DBE compliance. Thank you for catching this error. • Monitor certified payroll. Does the City of Stockton register public works project with Division of Industrial Relations (DIR) and get a “Project DIR number”? The contractors and sub-contractors register with DIR to pay the fees to DIR and get their DIR number and submit their certified payroll to ensure they are in labor compliance with DIR (Certified Payroll Reporting). Does the CM still need to collect the Design Build Contractor certified payroll and their sub-contractor certified payroll? The labor compliance responsibility has now been transferred to DIR. City of Stockton just need to verify that all contractors and subcontractors are registered with the DIR in conjunction with City of Stockton “Project DIR number” and ensure the DIR numbers are current. Please advise. The City will verify that the contractor is registered and the project is registered. The Construction Manager will be used to double check payroll if DIR requires the owner to check payroll. 16. 2.1.2 Construction Phase-page 7 of 29 EXHIBIT 1
Provide lab test results and Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC) documentation.• PMs are not equipped with a lab and equipment to do compaction test or compression test for concrete cylinder breaks or pull test for anchors. This is the responsibility of a third-party special inspection consultants that do testing. Please advise if this is still the PM’s scope of work and we will solicit pricing to include third party QA/QC inspection. We will need plans and spec from the Civil Engineer and Structural engineer & Mechanical Engineer on what special inspection is required on the soil compaction, concrete work, welding on the 52-inch and 48-inch pipes if welding is required. Please advise. Please solicit pricing or provide estimates to include third party QA/QC inspection.This can be added as a line item or as an allowance for general QA/QC inspections that the Construction Manager cannot perform themselves 17. 2.1.2 Construction Phase-page 7 of 29 Conduct biweekly status and coordination meetings • “biweekly” is a little ambiguous. Do we mean 2 time a week? Or 1 time every two weeks? Please clarify. I think the City of Stockton means 1 time every two weeks. Meeting 2 times a week is a little much just to have meetings. Please advise. At least, one meeting every two weeks. The City may require meetings up to one or twice a week potentially as well. Currently there are two to three meetings a week for this current design stage of the project.• Does Gateway Pacific Contractors have a PM that runs their meetings with the City of Stockton Stakeholders and their consultants and sub-contractors? Is it necessary to have a separate meeting from the Design Build Contractor (Gateway Pacific) construction stakeholders? If so, why not combine both meetings? Please advise. Nexgen is currently running the meetings for Gateway Pacific Contractors with the appropriate stake holders. Yes, it is necessary to have internal meetings that do not include the Gateway Pacific. These internal meetings are not in any schedule. They are as needed. • Who is the City of Stockton Stakeholders? Municipal Utility Department? Special Counsel Members? City Manager? Advisory Group? Please advise. In essence, it is the City of Stockton water customers. The City of Stockton is the owner of the Municipal Utilities Department (MUD). The MUD owns and operates the Water Utility. • Can these coordination meetings be in TEAMS, ZOOM, or Google Meets? Please advise. Most meetings right now are on Microsoft Teams. There are in person meetings roughly once a month. 18. 2.1.2 Construction Phase-page 7 of 29 Coordinates SCADA installation and integration support To coordinate SCADA installation and integration support we will need the following from the Desing Build Team and City of Stockton: o What pumps, valves, transducers, flow meters, etc. equipment does SCADA need to monitor? This information isn’t available yet or hasn’t been developed yet. o What input and output points do we need flow, temperature, pressure, water level, etc. (sensor control relays). This information isn’t available yet or hasn’t been developed yet.
EXHIBIT 1
o What graphics output does the City of Stockton want on the SCADA screen? This information isn’t available yet or hasn’t been developed yet.o Are we going to piggy back to the existing SCADA master unit or do we need a separate Master Unit that integrates to the existing SCADA unit? This hasn’t been determined yet. o Do we need remote terminal units (RTU), program logic controllers (PLC) or human machine interface (HMI)? The Construction Manager does not need to provide these devices. These devices will be provided by the City or the Gateway Pacific. o What network are we using? Ethernet, Modbus, PROFIBUS, or other? This information isn’t available yet or hasn’t been developed yet.o Who will be writing the commissioning plan? Gateway Pacific. o Will the City of Stockton have a separate third-party consultant to verify the commissioning plan? Yes.o Who will be writing the “sequence of operation” for the pumps, valves, flow meters, transducers, etc... that controls the water going in and out of the basins. This is totally separate from the standard operating procedures. This information isn’t available yet or hasn’t been determined yet.o Who will create the network architecture diagram to integrate the existing SCADA to the new equipment being installed for the basin? This information isn’t available yet or hasn’t been determined yet. o Does the City of Stockton have their own internal facilities person that programs the SCADA or does the City of Stockton sub out the programing to a consultant for SCADA programing? Please advise. The City of Stockton subs out the programming. • Besides the Design Build Team, who are the key stakeholder form the City of Stockton that will help verify and review equipment that needs to be monitored by SCADA and review the sequence of operation and commissioning plan to ensure installation and integration runs smoothly during commissioning? The Water Utilities’ operations and maintenance team. 19. 2.1.3 Post-Construction Phase-page 7 of 29 Manage punch list completion and final inspection • Per our site visit 5-8-25. The project will not be needing a permit form the City of Stockton or San Joaquin County. If the project does not have jurisdiction from the city or county; who will be signing off the fire life and safety or the final inspection for the project? There needs to be entity from the City of Stockton or the County of San Jaquin that will sign of the project i.e. City of Stockton Building & Life Safety Deputy Building Official or San Jaquin County Community Development Department Building Official. For fire life and safety, that will be done by the City of Stockton’s Fire Department. • Since the Delta Water Supply Project provides high quality water source for the community; will this project need a final inspection from San Juaquin County Environmental Health Department which inspects ponds and surface water inspections? Will this project also need a final inspection from California State Water Resource Control Board who ensures clean water for public health? The City of Stockton needs to ask these questions from the County and the State if their buy off and approval is required for this project in writing. Please advise. Gateway Pacific is responsible for completing and complying with any inspections by other agencies. 20. 2.1.3 Post-Construction Phase-page 7 of 29 EXHIBIT 1
Confirm compliance with CEQA mitigation comments• We need a copy of the CEQA mitigation comments. Sometimes the mitigation plan needs a certified biologist to confirm that the mitigation plans are followed not a CM. Will the City of Stockton consult with a biologist for mitigation compliance? Please advise. The EIR will be uploaded. Gateway Pacific will be providing the biologist. 21. 2.1.3 Post-Construction Phase-page 7 of 29Final Environmental Mitigation Report• The Final Environmental Report is typically written by Environmental Consultant or the Project Developer that wrote the mitigation efforts for the project. Are the CMs verifying that the Final Environmental Report is completed by Environmental Consultant? Please advise. No, the CMs are not verifying the final environmental report. 22. 2.1.3 Post-Construction Phase-page 7 of 29 Notice of Completion • Is the CM supposed to submit and file the notice of completion to San Joaquin County Recorders Office after the City Council approves the Notice of Completion? Please advise. No. 23. 6.4 TERM-page 11 of 29 The City intends to award an initial three (3) year contract with no option to renew. • ATTACHEMENT F- COST/PRICE PROPOSAL PUR 25-037 (DOCUMENT) o The project start date is August 01, 2025 and project end date of July 31, 2026. This is contrary to the terms of 3 years. Which is correct 1 year or 3 years? Please advise. The contract term will be for three years. The goal is not to end the construction manager’s contract on the exact same day the project is complete. 24. 7.9 LICENSING REQUIREMENTS-page 16 of 29 A City of Stockton Business license may be required for this project. • We contacted the City of Stockton Business License Division and informed us that the proponent does not need a City of Stockton Business license until a fully executed contract in signed by the proponent and the City of Stockton. Please advise. When the contract is being routed for approval, the construction manager who is being awarded the project will need to have a business license. This requirement will only be disregarded if the Business License Division does not require a business license because the construction manager will be working outside the limits of the City of Stockton. 25. 7.10 PREVAILING WAGE-page 16 of 29 • Prevailing wage rates may be required for this project according to State and Federal Labor Laws. The Proponent is a proprietor consultant with no employees. DIR does not have a prevailing wage for a consultant on their website for San Juaquin County see below. To properly fil out ATTACHEMT F-COST/PRICE PROPOSAL PUR 25-037 (DOCUMENT) that requires hourly rate breakdown, it is paramount to have the correct craft that matches the DIR information. Are consultants and A&E firms exempt from registering with DIR? I did not find civil engineers or Geotech engineers on the list below. Please advise so proponent EXHIBIT 1
can properly fill out Attachment F with the correct hourly rate to match the DIR labor hourly rate. Or advise if proprietor consultants and A&E firms are exempt. These questions should be directed to DIR.
26.1 Overview-page 03 of 19• Second paragraph “involves the permitting”. Please clarify what is to be permitted? Basin? Equipment? Please advise. Gateway Pacific will determine what needs to be permitted.• What government entity will be reviewing and approving the permit? City of Stockton Building & Life Safety? San Joaquin County Community Development Department? Please advise. This will need to be discussed in a future meeting with Gateway Pacific to determine. The City of Stockton Fire Department may do their own inspection.• Will there be special permits from California State Water Resource Control Board? Or special permits from San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department? Please advise. This will need to be discussed in a future meeting with Gateway Pacific to determine. The City of Stockton Fire Department may do their own inspection.27.1 Overview-page 03 of 19• Paragraph 3. Please provide a copy of Geosyntech Consultants Preliminary Design Report (PDR) dated December 2023. Please see Exhibit 6A, 6B and 6C.28.1 Overview-page 03 of 19• Paragraph 3. Who will be verifying the “raw water diversion flow rates, groundwater recharge rates”? Geosyntech Consultants? Gateway Pacific Contractors? Nexgen Utility Management? Third party commissioning agent? Please advise. The City of Stockton.
EXHIBIT 1
29.2 Approved Scope of Work-page 05 of 19• Paragraph 3. Preparation of SCADA system design. Will there be a detailed sequence of operation and network architecture that will integrate the existing SCADA system to the new Rechard Basins for CMs to review? And who will be providing this documentation for CM review? Please advise Yes and provided by Gateway Pacific. 30. 2 Approved Scope of Work-page 05 of 19• Paragraph 5. “City will sign permit application” Please confirm that the building permit will be through the City of Stockton. Per our job walk on 05-08-2025, the permitting agency was unknown. Confirm that the building permit approval is through the City of Stockton. Please advise. If a building permit is needed, it will go through the City of Stockton. At this time, a building permit is not considered to be needed.31. 2 Approved Scope of Work-page 05 of 19• Paragraph 10. “Develop of a startup, commissioning and testing plans that will demonstrate facility compliance”. Will the City of Stockton hire Geosyntec Consultant to verify facility compliance and commissioning? Or will the City of Stockton hire a third-party commissioning agent to verify facility compliance and commissioning? The Construction Manager will help with verifying the demonstration of compliance, but Gateway Pacific is ultimately responsible with developing a startup, doing the commissioning, and verifying that it all works. The Water Utility Operations and Maintenance team will also be there for the commissioning to confirm the system is working as intended. 32. 2 Approved Scope of Work-page 06 of 19• Paragraph 5. “Results of the initial Acceptance Test”. What if the initial Acceptance Test fails? Does the City of Stockton have a plan B? Does Gateway Pacific Contractor have a mitigation plan if we don’t get the designed raw water diversion flow rates and groundwater recharge rates? Please advise. This hasn’t been determined or discussed yet.• If Gateway Pacific Contractors built the basins per Geosyntech Consultants PDR dated December 2023, will Geosyntech Consultants provide new design to mitigate the design failure free of charge to City of Stockton?They should have professional service insurance being registered professionals for errors and omissions. Please advise.No.33.3 Feasibility Studies and Preliminary Design Report-page 06 of 19• Paragraph 4.• The bottom of the basin is 3 feet below grade and this is why the three ponds are calculated with removal of 3 feet of top material. Why not at 1-feet or 2-feet? The reason I ask is that at 3 feet below grade and a 5 foot above grade berm levy we will probably have dirt stockpile or off haul which can be very expensive. A 5-feet to 15-feet tall stockpile will be an eye sore EXHIBIT 1
to the community neighbors. With out civil drawings my rough order calculation for stock pile is over 100,000 cubic yards of stockpile. Does the City of Stockton have room to stockpile? Please advise. Yes, the City has room to stockpile. • I recognize that the preliminary design has already been done and the consultants probably did boring and ground testing. I am not a registered geologist or civil engineer. Can the City of Stockton reduce the basin dept, increase the berm levy’s height or widen the berm levy and increase the number of drywells to increase percolation and still meet the original design criteria so that we have a balance site with no stock pile? Please advise. The City will not focus the design efforts to mitigate all stock pile. 34. 4 Design Criteria-page 07 of 19 • Paragraph 1. What are the acronyms “WID” and “MICUP”? Woodbridge Irrigation District and Mokelumne River Integrated Conjunctive Use Program. 35. 4 Design Criteria-page 07 of 19 • Paragraph 1. “The actual infiltration rate through the dry wells would be determined after the project is operational”. Wouldn’t the City of Stockton need to know the drywell infiltration rate is meeting the Geosyntech Consultants PDR dated December 2023 prior to project operational? No. Why build basins, drywells, and pumps if actual infiltration rate does not meet the design infiltration rate after the project is operational? Please advise. The basins, drywells, and pumps are expected to meet the design infiltration rates. 36. 5 Project Design Features-page 10 of 19 • Paragraph 2. “Dual-Wall high density polyethylene (HDPE). Is the dual-wall HDPE pipe pressurized or is it use for drainage purpose with no pressure? Please advise. Pressurized. 37. 5 Project Design Features-page 10 of 19 • Recharge Basin Features Paragraph 1. What is CCP? Please advise. Steel cement mortar lined and coated pipe 38. 5 Project Design Features-page 10 of 19 • Recharge Basin Features Paragraph 1. “A welded saddle connection”. Will this be a hot tap connection to the 54-inch line? This is not determined yet. If not where are the isolation valves to shut off the water for the 54-inch line? The pumps at the Intake Pump Station would need to be turned off. This will require a lock out tag out procedure for the energized existing 54-inch line and off hours work to do the welding of the saddle to reduce the impact to the City of Stockton. Will this work be fully coordinated with City of Stockton Municipal Utility Department? Please advise. Yes. 39. 5 Project Design Features-page 12 of 19 • Project Amenities paragraph 1. These gates will need power and data for the card readers and camera. Where is the nearest power and data? Who is the software/hardware provider for the card readers? Honeywell? Siemens? Or other? Please advise. Multiple circuits will need to be run to the gates and visitor center. Bay Alarm is the contractor who provides the hardware such as card readers and cameras. 40. 5 Project Design Features-page 12 of 19 EXHIBIT 1
• Project Amenities paragraph 2. “A premanufactured bathroom will be located within the parking area”? Yes, in the visitor center. Is the bathroom self-contained and will require weekly water tank refill and weekly cleaning of the restrooms sanitary waste? It is a waterless bathroom. If not, the restroom will need power, sewer and water utility? Possibly power. It will not connect to the existing sewer system. Where are the nearest utilities for the premanufactured bathroom? This distance from each utility hasn’t been measured. Please advise. 41. 5 Project Design Features-page 12 of 19 •Project Amenities paragraph 3. Have the permits been filed to San Juaquin County Environmental Health Department been filed for the five nested groundwater monitoring wells? Please advise. Gateway Pacific is responsible for completing any permits that are needed. 42. 5 Project Design Features-page 12 of 19 •Project Amenities paragraph 3. Will the single pressure transducer be integrated to the SCADA system? Please advise. Yes. 43. 5 Project Design Features-page 12 of 19 •New 500 HP VFD Installation paragraph 1. Will this VFD coupled to an existing 500 HP pump and replace the soft start? Yes. Will this VFD be integrated to SCADA or stand alone to slowly ramp up and ramp down the pump? Please advise. Integrated to SCADA. 44. Exhibit 2 Schedule-page 01 of 01 • During our job walk on 05-08-2025, we were informed that the project is currently at 30 percent design and spec. Exhibit 2 schedule shows 30 percent design completion November 2024. We are now May 2025. This schedule is 5 months behind schedule. Will the City of Stockton receive a recovery schedule from Gateway Pacific Contractors that maintains the contractual completion date of September 30 2026? Yes. If not, will the City of Stockton get a revised schedule no cost time extension from Gateway Pacific Contractors? N/A Will this push back Exhibit 2 Schedule 5 months? Please advise. This hasn’t been determined yet. • ATTACHEMENT F – COST/PRICE PROPOSAL PUR 25-037 (DOCUMENT) shows Project Start Date of August 01, 2025 and Project End Date July 31, 2026. Will this attachment be amended? Please advise.The construction management contract is going to be three years to ensure that the construction management contract does not end before the project is complete. In addition, the construction manager will have valuable institutional knowledge of the project. We want to ensure we can tap into that information even after the project is complete.
EXHIBIT 1
45.Exhibit 3 Insurance Requirements-page 01 of 04• Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance. 3. Worker’s Compensation.• As a proponent sole proprietor with no employees; 2024 California Code Business and Professions Code Article 7.5 – Workers’ Compensation Insurance Reports Section 7125 para (b) (1) exempts sole proprietor with no employees from requiring Workers’ Compensation insurance. Please advise if Sole proprietor will need workers' compensation insurance? Please advise. The City of Stockton follows the laws for insurance requirements, but at times may ask for additional insurance to ensure the City is protected.
EXHIBIT 1
46. Exhibit 3 Insurance Requirements-page 03 of 04• “Claims Made Policies (Professional & Pollution only)”. “2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract work”. Why is this necessary? This is a requirement by the City of Stockton. As PMs for the City of Stockton we are not registered engineers designing anything or polluting anything. Please provide an example of why the 5 years after completion of the contract work insurance requirement is required doing PM work. I will include the additional 5 years insurance requirement if the insurance is really needed. Please advise. The proponent is required to comply with the City of Stockton’s insurance requirements. The City of Stockton follows the laws for insurance requirements, but at times may ask for additional insurance to ensure the City is protected.47. Exhibit 3 Insurance Requirements-page 03 of 04• “Duration of Coverage”. “GL & Excess liability policies”, must be provided for at least five (5) years EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1
REV 2024-03-25 Exhibit : Insurance Requirements (Professional Services)Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance againstclaims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 0001 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completedoperations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limitsno less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, eitherthe general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9(non-owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury andproperty damage.3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, withStatutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance appropriates to theConsultant’s profession, with limit no less than $3,000,000 per occurrence or claim,$3,000,000 aggregate.If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Stockton requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Stockton. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
EXHIBIT 1
The City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; andCG 20 37 if a later edition is used). Additional insured Name of Organization shall read “City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.” Policy shall cover City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for all locations work is done under this contract. For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributoryand at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. The City of Stockton does not accept endorsements limiting the Contractor’s insurance coverage to the sole negligence of the Named Insured. The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Contractor’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City of Stockton. Contractor hereby grants to City of Stockton a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Stockton by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any EXHIBIT 1
endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Stockton has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Stockton. The City of Stockton may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Stockton. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City of Stockton. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City of Stockton may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Contractor to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City of Stockton reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Stockton. If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage: 1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided . 3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of years after completion of work.
EXHIBIT 1
Contractor shall furnish the City of Stockton with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City of Stockton before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City of Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City of Stockton is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided . City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. Certificate Holder Address The address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be: City of StocktonIts Officers, Officials, Employees, and Volunteers400 E Main St, 3rd Floor – HRStockton, CA 95202 EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT CGENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS1. Goods, Equipment and Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forthin this Agreement, Contractor shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A ofthe Agreement. Contractor shall provide said services at the time, place and in themanner specified in Exhibit A of the Agreement.2. City Assistance, Facilities, Equipment and Clerical Support. Except as setforth in Exhibit A, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish and maintain allfacilities and equipment that may be required for furnishing services pursuant to thisAgreement. If applicable, City shall furnish to Contractor only the facilities andequipment listed in Exhibit A to the Agreement.3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant tothis Agreement as described more particularly in Exhibit A and Exhibit E to theAgreement.3.1 Invoices submitted by Contractor to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time spent and City reference number. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s invoice, City will review invoice, and if acceptable make payment on approved invoice. 3.2 Upon completion of work and acceptance by City, Contractor shall have sixty(60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may begranted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance ofsaid time limitation. The City shall have no obligation or liability to pay anyinvoice for work performed which the Contractor fails or neglects to submitwithin sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after thework is accepted by the City.4. Sufficiency of Contractor’s Work. All Contractor services, work, anddeliverables shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner with duediligence in accordance with the degree of skill normally exercised by similarcontractors supplying services and work of a similar nature, and in conformancewith applicable laws, codes and professional standards. Contractor’s work shall beadequate and sufficient to meet the purposes of this Agreement.5. Ownership of Work. All reports, work product, all other documents completed orpartially completed by Contractor or its approved subcontractors, in performance of thisAgreement, and if applicable, drawings, designs, and plan review comments shall becomethe property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is herebyassigned to the City and the Contractor and its approved subcontractors agree1 EXHIBIT 1
to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement. If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Contractor shall replace them at its own expense. Contractor and its approved subcontractors shall keep materials confidential. Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Agreement and shall not be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services, unless the City provides prior written consent.6. Timeliness.Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Further, Contractoracknowledges that the failure of Contractor to comply with the time limits described inExhibit A and Exhibit F may result in economic or other losses to the City.7. Changes. Both parties to this Agreement understand that it may becomedesirable or necessary during the term of this Agreement for City to modify the scopeof services provided for under this Agreement. Any material extension or change in thescope of work shall be discussed with City and the change and cost shall bememorialized in a written amendment to the original contract prior to the performanceof the additional work. Until the amendment is so executed, City will not be responsibleto pay any charges Contractor may incur in performing such additional services, andContractor shall not be required to perform any such additional services.8. Amendment. No variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unlessan amendment is made in writing and signed by both parties.9. Contractor’s Status.9. 1 In performing the obligations set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shallhave the status of an independent contractor and Contractor shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Contractor are its agents and employees and are not agents or employees of City. Contractor by virtue of this Agreement, has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of City. Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City. No agent, officer or employee of the City is to be considered an employee of the Contractor. It is understood by both Contractor and City that this Agreement shall not be construed or considered under any circumstances to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture. 9.2Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's2 EXHIBIT 1
control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of thisAgreement. Contractor has control over the manner and means of performing the services under this Agreement. If necessary, Contractor has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Contractor in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement. 9.3 If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision and control of Contractor. All terms of employment including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring and discharging or any other term of employment or requirements of law shall be determined by the Contractor.9.4 It is further understood and agreed that Contractor must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Contractor's assigned personnel under the terms and conditions of this Agreement.10. Subcontractor.10.1 Subcontractors shall not be recognized as having any direct or contractualrelationship with City. Contractor shall be responsible for the work of subcontractors, which shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Subcontractors will be provided with a copy of the Agreement and be bound by its terms. Contractor is responsible to City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and persons directly or indirectly employed by them. 10.2 If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision and control of Contractor. All terms of employment including hours, wages working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging or any other term of employment or requirement of law shall be determined by Contractor. 10.3 It is further understood and agreed that ontractor must issue W-2 11. Termination.11.1 Termination for Convenience of City. The City may terminate thisAgreement at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Contractor. The Agreement shall then be deemed terminated, and no further work shall be performed by Contractor. If the Agreement is so terminated, the Contractor shall be paid for the work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received.3 EXHIBIT 1
11. 2 Should either party default in the performance of this Agreement ormaterially breach any of its provisions, the other party, at that party’s option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to the other party.11.3 Funding- Non-Appropriation. It is mutually understood between the Parties that payment to the Contractor for performance shall be dependent upon the availability of appropriations by the City Council for the purposes of this Agreement. No legal liability on the part of the City for any payment may arise under this Agreement until funds are made available and until the Contractor has received funding availability, which will be confirmed in writing. If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted, or if the City loses funding for any reason, the City, in its sole discretion, shall have the option to either (a) cause this Agreement to be canceled or terminated pursuant to applicable provisions of the Agreement; or (b) offer to amend the Agreement to reflect the reduced funding for this Agreement.Non-Assignability. The Contractor shall not assign, sublet, or transfer thisAgreement or any interest or obligation in the Agreement without the prior writtenconsent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may setforth in writing. Contractor shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors.Indemnity and Hold Harmless. Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain infull force and effect at its own cost and expense the insurance coverage as set forth inthe attached Exhibit B to this Agreement and shall otherwise comply with the other provisions of Exhibit B to this Agreement.Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent bycertified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed in Exhibit A to this Agreement.Conformance to Applicable Laws. Contractor shall comply with allapplicable Federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Contractorshall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of servicesunder this Agreement on the basis of any legally protected classification, includingrace, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person.4 EXHIBIT 1
17. Licenses, Certifications and Permits. Prior to the City’s execution of thisAgreement and prior to the Contractor’s engaging in any operation or activity set forthin this Agreement, Contractor shall obtain a City of Stockton business license, whichmust be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor covenants that ithas obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform theservices under this Agreement. Such licenses, certificates and permits shall bemaintained in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement.18. Records and Audits. Contractor shall maintain all records regarding thisAgreement and the services performed for a period of three (3) years from the date thatfinal payment is made. At any time during normal business hours, the records shall bemade available to the City to inspect and audit. To the extent Contractor renders serviceson a time and materials basis, Contractor shall maintain complete and accurateaccounting records, in a form prescribed by City or, if not prescribed by City, inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles, such records to include, but notbe limited to, payroll records, attendance cards, time sheets, and job summaries.19. Confidentiality. Contractor shall exercise reasonable precautions to preventthe unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.20. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor covenants that other than this Agreement,Contractor has no financial interest with any official, employee or other representativeof the City. Contractor and its principals do not have any financial interest in realproperty, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any manner ofdegree by the performance of Contractor’s services under this Agreement. If such aninterest arises, Contractor shall immediately notify the City.21. Waiver. In the event either City or Contractor at any time waive any breach ofthis Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other orsucceeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or of any other covenant,condition or obligation. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partialacceptance by City shall operate as a waiver on the part of City of any of its rightsunder this Agreement.22. Governing Law. California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to thisAgreement with venue for all claims in the Superior Court of the County of SanJoaquin, Stockton Branch or, where applicable, in the Federal District Court ofCalifornia, Eastern District, Sacramento Division.23. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liableto Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount dueContractor.5 EXHIBIT 1
24. Severability.If any portion of this Agreement or application thereof to anyperson or circumstance shall be declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction orif it is found in contravention of any federal, state or city statue, ordinance or regulationthe remaining provisions of this Agreement or the application thereof shall not beinvalidated thereby and shall remain in full force and effect to the extent that theprovisions of this Agreement are severable.25. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor and itsofficers, employees, agents, representatives or subcontractors shall not unlawfullydiscriminate in violation of any federal, state, or local law, rule or regulation against anyemployee, applicant for employment or person receiving services under this Agreementbecause of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability,medical condition (including genetic characteristics), marital status, age, political affiliation,gender identity, gender expression, sex or sexual orientation, family and medical careleave, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. Contractor and its officers, employees, agents,representative or subcontractors shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and locallaws and regulations related to non-discrimination and equal opportunity, including withoutlimitation the City’s nondiscrimination policy; the Fair Employment and Housing Act(Government Code sections 12990 (et seq.); California Labor Code sections 1101, 1102and 1102.1; the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), as amended; and allapplicable regulations promulgated in the California Code of Regulation or Code of FederalRegulations. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that “no person in the UnitedStates shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participationin, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program oractivity receiving federal financialassistance.” (42 USC Section 2000d).http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titlevi.htm. The City requires compliance withthe requirements of Title VI in all of its programs and activities regardless of fundingsource.26. Force Majeure. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or failures inperformance resulting from acts of God, acts of civil or military authority, terrorism, fire,flood, strikes, war, epidemics, pandemics, shortage of power or other acts or causesreasonably beyond the control of that party. The party experiencing the force majeureevent agrees to give the other party notice promptly following the occurrence of a forcemajeure event, and to use diligent efforts to re-commence performance as promptly ascommercially practicable.27. Taxes and Charges.Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes,fees, contributions or charges applicable to the conduct of the Contractor’s business.28. Cumulative Rights. Any specific right or remedy provided in this Agreement willnot be exclusive but will be cumulative of all other rights and remedies to which may belegally entitled.6 EXHIBIT 1
29. Advice of Attorney.Each party warrants and represents that in executing thisAgreement, it has received independent legal advice from its attorneys or theopportunity to seek such advice.30. Heading Not Controlling.Headings used in this Agreement are for referencepurposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.31. Entire Agreement, Integration, and Modification.31.1 This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement betweenContractor and the City; supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral between the parties and may be amended only by a written Amendment signed by the Contractor and City Manager.31.2 All Exhibits to this Agreement and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document.32. Counterparts.This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed togetherand shall constitute one agreement.33. Authority.The individual(s) executing this Agreement represent and warrant thatthey have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legalentities. 7 EXHIBIT 1
1 (Rev. 07.12.22)
EXHIBIT DPROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS1. Definitions.The following words and phrases have the following meanings for purposes of this Agreement: 1.1 "Services" means, collectively, the services, duties and responsibilities described in Exhibit A of this Agreement and any and all work necessary to complete them or carry them out fully and to the standard of performance required in this Agreement.1.2upon completion of a project. A deliverable is any tangible material, work or thing delivered by one party to the other, including associated technical documentation. A deliverable can be tangible or intangible parts of the development process, and often are specified functions or characteristics of the project.2. General.The following terms and conditions are applicable for the Professional Services only. The special conditions shall be read in conjunction with the Standard Agreement, General Terms and Conditions (GTC) Exhibit C, and all other Exhibits identified in the Standard Agreement.2.1Where any portion of the GTC is in conflict to or at variance with any provisions of the Special Conditions of the Agreement, then unless a different intention stated, the provision(s) of the Special Conditions of the Agreement shall be deemed to override the provision(s) of GTC only to the extent that such conflict or variations in the Special Conditions of the Agreement are not possible of being reconciled with the provisions of the GTC.2.2In the case of modification of a part or provision of the GTC, the unaltered part or provision, or both shall remain in effect. The Special Conditions shall relate to a particular project and be peculiar to that project but shall not weaken the character or intent of the GTC.3. Time for Performance.3.1 Contractor shall perform the services according to the schedule contained in Exhibit F.3.2 Timeliness of Performance i) Contractor shall provide the Services, and Deliverables within the term and within the time limits required under this Agreement, pursuant to the provisions of Exhibit A and Exhibit F. ii) Neither Contractor nor Contractorsubcontractors are entitled to any damages from the City, nor is any party entitled to be reimbursed by the City, for damages, charges or other EXHIBIT 1
2 (Rev. 07.12.22)
losses or expenses incurred by Contractor by reason of delays or hindrances in the performance of the Services, whether or not caused by the City.4. Standard of PerformanceIn addition to Exhibit C, Section 4 and 17, Contractor agrees as follows:4.1 Contractorervices shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of Contractorprofession currently practicing under similar conditions. Contractorof performance, applicable laws, regulations, and industry standards. By delivery of completed work, Contractor certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and local laws. If Contractor is retained to perform services requiring a license, certification, registration or other similar requirement under California law, Contractor shall maintain that license, certification, registration or other similar requirement throughout the term of this Agreement.4.2 Contractor acknowledges that it is entrusted with or has access to valuable and confidential information and records of the City and with respect to that information, Contractor agrees to be held to the standard of care of a fiduciary. Contractor shall assure that all services that require the exercise of professional skills or judgment are accomplished by professionals qualified and competent in the applicable discipline and appropriately licensed, if required by law. Contractor must provide copies of any such licenses. Contractor remains responsible for the professional and technical accuracy of all Services or Deliverables furnished, whether by Contractor or its subcontractors or others on its behalf. All Deliverables must be prepared in a form and content satisfactory to the Using Agency and delivered in a timely manner consistent with the requirements of this Agreement.4.3 If Contractor fails to comply with the foregoing standards, Contractor must perform again, at its own expense, all Services required to be re-performed as a direct or indirect result of that failure. Any review, approval, acceptance or payment for any of the Services by the City does not relieve Contractor of its responsibility for the professional skill and care and technical accuracy of its Services and Deliverables. This provision in Contractor either under this Agreement, at law or in equity.5. Compensation5.1 In addition to Section 3 Compensation in Exhibit C GTC, the Contractorshall be compensated for the services provided under this Agreement as follows:5.1.1 Contractor shall be compensated for services rendered and accepted under this Agreement and shall be paid monthly, in arrears on a not to exceed EXHIBIT 1
3 (Rev. 07.12.22)
basis, based upon the rates set forth in Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. Contractor may vary the compensation for each task in Exhibit E provided that the total project compensation listed in Exhibit E and the Standard Agreement is not exceeded. 6. Personnel6.1 None of the work or services covered by this Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. Any work or services subcontracted hereunder shall be specified by written agreement and shall be subject to each provision of this Agreement. Contractor shall provide subcontractor a copy of this fully executed Agreement.6.2 Contractor agrees to assign only competent personnel according to the reasonable and customary standards of training and experience in the relevant field to perform services under this Agreement. Failure to assign such competent personnel shall constitute grounds for termination of this Agreement. The payment made to Contractorpursuant to this Agreement shall be the full and complete compensation to which Contractor and Contractorcontractors are entitled for performance of any work under this Agreement. Neither Contractor nor Contractorofficers or employees are entitled to any salary or wages, or retirement, health, leave or other fringe benefits applicable to employees of the City. The City will not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of Contractor. The City shall not be required to pay any workers' compensation insurance on behalf of Contractor. Contractor shall pay, when and as due, any and all taxes incurred as a result of Contractorhereunder, including estimated taxes, and shall provide City with proof of such payments upon request.6.3 Key Personnel: Because of the special skills required to satisfy the requirements of this Agreement, Contractor shall not reassign or replace key personnel without the written consent of the City, which consent the City will not unreasonably withhold. "key personnel" means those job titles and the persons assigned to those positions in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The City may at any time in writing notify Contractor that the City will no longer accept performance of Services under this Agreement by one or more Key Personnel listed. Upon that notice Contractorshall immediately suspend the services of the key person or persons and must replace him or them in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. A list of key personnel is found in Exhibit A, Scope of Services.7. Reports and InformationContractor shall at such times and in such forms as the City may require furnish the City such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, the costs and obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters are covered by this Agreement as specified in Exhibit A and Exhibit E.
EXHIBIT 1
4 (Rev. 07.12.22)
8. Findings ConfidentialAll of the reports, information, data, et cetera, prepared or assembled by the Contractor under this Agreement are confidential and the Contractor agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City. Contractor shall not be required under the provisions of this paragraph to keep confidential any data or information which is or becomes publicly available, is required by applicable law or by proper legal or governmental authority, is alindependently developed by Contractor outside the scope of this Agreement or is rightfully obtained from third parties. Contractor shall give City prompt notice of any such legal or governmental demand and reasonably cooperate with City in any effort to seek a protective order or otherwise to contest such required disclosure.9. CopyrightNo materials, including but not limited to reports, maps, or documents produced as a result of this Agreement, in whole or in part, shall be available to Contractor for copyright purposes. Any such materials produced as a result of this Agreement that might be subject to copyright shall be the property of the City and all such rights shall belong to the City, and the City shall be sole and exclusive entity who may exercise such rights.10. Deliverables Contractor shall prepare or provide to the City various Deliverables. "Deliverables" include work product, such as written reviews, recommendations, reports and analyses, produced by Contractor for the City. The City may reject Deliverables that do not include relevant information or data, or do not include all documents or other materials specified in this Agreement or reasonably necessary for the purpose for which the City made this Agreement or for which the City intends to use the Deliverables. If the City determines that Contractor has failed to comply with the foregoing standards, it has 30 days from the discovery to notify Contractor of its failure. If Contractor does not correct the failure, or if it is possible to do so, within 30 days after receipt of notice from the City specifying the failure, then the City, by written notice, may treat the failure as a default of this Agreement. Partial or incomplete Deliverables may be accepted for review only when required for a specific and well-defined purpose and when consented to in advance by the City. Such Deliverables will not be considered as satisfying the requirements of this Agreement and partial or incomplete Deliverables in no way relieve Contractor of its commitments under this Agreement. 11. Applicable LawsDeliverables must conform with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Suchconformity includes compliance with federal sanctions, and Contractor certifies that it hasnot and will not engage in prohibited transactions with sanctioned persons or entities.
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT ECOMPENSATION SCHEDULE The Contractor shall be compensated for the services identified in Exhibit A, Exhibit C, and Exhibit D to this Agreement as follows: 1. Project Price1.1 The maximum the Contractor shall be paid on this Agreement is $728,760.00 (hereafter the “not to exceed” amount). The “not to exceed” amount includes all payments to be made pursuant to this Agreement, including City approved reimbursable expenses, if any. Nothing in this Agreement requires the City to pay for work that does not meet the Standard of Performance identified in Exhibit D section 4 or other requirements of this Agreement. 1.2 Standard Reimbursable Items: Only the reimbursable items identified in Exhibit A, C, and D (Compensation), shall be compensated to the Contractor. Reimbursable expenses will be reimbursed without markup. Fees plus reimbursable expenses shall not exceed the amount set forth in section 1.1 of this Exhibit and a copy of the original invoice for the items listed in i, ii or iii below shall be attached to the invoice submitted to the City for reimbursement. Payments shall be based upon work documents submitted by the Contractor to the City and accepted by the City as being satisfactory to City’s needs. The City shall not pay a markup on any of the items listed in i, ii or iii. Additionally, items such a telephone, fax, postage or freight are already included in the billable hourly rate. Contractor shall be reimbursed the direct expenses, which are the actual cost of the following items that are reasonable, necessary and actually incurred, by the Contractor in connection with the services: i. Expenses, fees or charges for printing, reproduction or binding of documents at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost. ii. Any filing fees, permit fees, or other fees paid or advanced by the Contractor at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost. iii. Travel expenses shall be reimbursed in accordance with the City’s travel policy, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reimbursement shall be made at actual costs with no markup added to the actual cost. 1.3 The Contractor shall be entitled to receive payments for its work performed pursuant to the Agreement. The City will pay Contractor based on invoices for acceptable work performed and approved until the “not to exceed” amount is reached. Thereafter, Contractor must complete services based on the Agreement without additional compensation unless there is a material change to the Statement of Work and Scope by a written Amendment.
EXHIBIT 1
1.4 If work is completed before the “not to exceed” amount is reached, the Contractor’s compensation will be based on the Contractor’s invoices previously submitted for acceptable work performed and approved. 1.5 Subcontractor Costs: Compensation for subcontractors shall be limited to the same restrictions imposed on the Contractor. Maximum markup Contractor may apply to subcontractor fees, minus reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed 15%.2.Task Price. Below is the price for the services and reimbursable expenses as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. See Attachment A (Cost Proposal – ICM) 3. Hourly Rates. The following is a list of hourly billable rates that Contractor shall apply for additional services requested of the Contractor. Contractor shall be compensated based on the hourly rates set forth below, on a time and material basis for those services that are within the general scope of services of this Agreement, but beyond the description of services required under Exhibit A, and all services are reasonably necessary to complete the standards of performance required by this Agreement. Any changes and related fees shall be mutually agreed upon between the parties by a written amendment to this Agreement. See Attachment A (Cost Proposal – ICM) 5. Invoice to Address. Each invoice submitted shall identify the specific task(s) listed in Exhibit A and this Exhibit, and the completed work product/deliverable for the agreed upon price listed in this Exhibit. Invoices shall be submitted to the below address: [email protected] EXHIBIT 1
ICM
EXHIBIT 1
ICM
7040 Settlers Trail Shingle Springs, CA 95682 www.icmgroupusa.com Phone 916-792-9871 May 29, 2025City of StocktonAttn: Orlathai Chanachai-Chum425 N. El Dorado St.Stockton, CA [email protected]: RFP PUR 25-037 Construction Management Services Part 2 Cost ProposalGroundwater Recharge Basin ProjectDear Ms. Chanachai-Chum:Enclosed please find our cost proposal for the referenced project. Our cost proposal provides a schedule of hourly rates proposal for our staff. Assumptions related to cost are included. Our costs, those of ICM and our subconsultants Youngdahl, Bay Area Coatings, and American River Environmental, are good through December 31, 2026; thereafter there will be a 5% yearly increase.ICM complies with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) Prevailing Wage requirements. Our DIR number is: 1000036717. Our subconsultants also comply with DIR requirements.Thank you for reviewing our cost proposal. If you have questions or comments, please call me at 916-792-9871.Sincerely,Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc.Jeffrey Inferrera, PEPresident EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1
Stockton Groundwater Recharge Basin Project
ICM
ICM
Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. Fee Schedule For the City of Stockton Construction Management Services Groundwater Basin Recharge Project PUR 25-037 Labor Hourly Rates by PositionConstruction Manager $250Resident Engineer $210Construction Inspector $180Electrical Special Inspector $195Mechanical Special Inspector $195Structural Special Inspector $195Office Engineer $150Administrator $95Expense RatesVehicle per month See Note 6Field Computer, per month $50Field Phone/Internet, per month $150Other ODCs billed separatelyAdministrative FeesExpenses 0%Subconsultants 5%Notes:1. Minimum 4-hour onsite charge per site or off-site visits.2. Overtime for work performed on Monday thru Friday will be charged 1.5 times the hourly rate for time worked over eight hours a day up to 12 hours, and 2 times the hourly rate for time worked over twelve hours. 3. Work on Saturday will be charged the 1.5 times overtime rate for the first eight hours and 2 times the hourly rate for time worked over 8 hours.4. Work on Sunday and Holidays will be charged at the 2 times overtime rate. 5. Second shift work performed commencing after 2 p.m. or before 4 a.m. will be charged an additional $20 per hour.6. Vehicles will be charged per Prevailing Wage Requirements plus minimum $40 per day; not to exceed $1,800 per month.7. This Rate Schedule is valid until December 31, 2026. Rates increase 5% per year thereafter.
EXHIBIT 1
PREVAILING WAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (2025)PERSONNEL STANDARD RATEPrincipal EngineerSenior Engineer/Geologist/ScientistProject Engineer/Geologist/Environmental ScientistStaff Engineer/Geologist/ScientistField SupervisorNDT Special Inspector/Floor FlatnessICC Lead Special Inspector, DSA Masonry – Group 1 (excluding NDT) For Non-Prevailing Wage TasksICC/AWS/CWI Certified Special Inspector – Group 2 For Non-Prevailing Wage TasksSoils Engineering Technician ; ACI Groups 3 & 4 For Non-Prevailing Wage TasksEnvironmental TechnicianQSD-Qualified SWPPP DeveloperQSP-Qualified SWPPP PractitionerLaboratory ManagerSenior Laboratory TechnicianLaboratory TechnicianDraftspersonClerical$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $230.00185.00173.00163.00163.00163.00154.00135.00143.00132.00138.00107.00116.00156.00116.00162.00126.00102.00112.00106.00/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hr/hrBASIS OF CHARGESEquipment Charges:All of the above rates are inclusive of routine test equipment.Exceptions:Coring MachineGeneratorHigh Precision GPS ReceiverPhoto-Ionization DetectorSkidmoreFireproofing Adhesion- $200/day- $75/day- $150/day- $100/day- $100/day- $25/testHours are billed portal to portal in accordance with the following minimum charges:Times are rounded up to the nearest ½ hour. 2-hour minimum on-site charge for each site visit. 4-hour minimum on-site charge for weekend work.2-hour minimum charge for work scheduled that was not cancelled by 5pm the day before.Overtime:Over eight (8) hours a daySaturdaysOver eight (8) hours on SaturdaysSundays and HolidaysOver twelve (12) hours a dayNight Work 5:00 pm – 5:00 am- 1.5 x hourly rate- 1.5 x hourly rate- 2.0 x hourly rate- 2.0 x hourly rate- 2.0 x hourly rate- $10+ hourly rateMobilization Charge:A mobilization charge of $ 80.00/site visit will be added for all projects requiring site visits within 40 miles of our corporate yard. For projects beyond 40 miles, a mileage fee will be assessed at $0.95/mile portal to portal per visitfrom our corporate headquarters address to the project site. Distance will be determined by Google Maps quickest calculated distance.
EXHIBIT 1
BASIS OF CHARGES (Cont.)Expert Witness Services:Mediation, arbitration, deposition, expert witness testimony and public hearing attendance will be billed at 2 times normal hourly rates in 4-hour incremental blocks.Rush Charges:Field:An additional 1 hour of field time at the appropriate personnel rate maybe charged to expedite work which requires dispatching after 4:30 pm of the previous day, or the same day, as requested by the contractor or client.Large Format Plotting:Color or Black & White- $12 minimum setup + 0.65 per sq. footMiscellaneous Charges:Supplies and outside services are billed at cost +15%Airfare, rental vehicles, lodging, and meals for authorized out-of-town travel, will be charged per person per day using the current IRS per diem rate applicable to the area.Subcontracted work will be billed at cost +15%Projects with specialized accounting protocol required to be filled out for the client will be charged an additional 4% of the project budgetCopying and distribution for project reporting includes 4 reports. If additional report copying is necessary, a $25.00 charge will be billed for each additional reportProjects requiring Level C PPE will be charged at 1.5 x normal hourly rate$10.00 surcharge may be applied to normal rates for projects where naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) is present.TERMS AND CONDITIONS:Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc. shall perform professional services in accordance with the generally accepted professional practice of its profession within the area where the work is performed on behalf of the client. Upon entering into this agreement many risks potentially affect Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc. The principal risk is the potential for human error by Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc. Client agrees to limit our liability to Client and to all other parties for damages arising from any and all claims, losses, costs, damages of any nature whatsoever or claims expenses from any cause or causes, including attorneys’ fees and costs and expert-witness fees and costs shall be limited to $25,000.00 and Client further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc. from and against all liabilities in excess of monetary limit established above. (Prevailing Wage Fee Schedule for Professional Services on Front of Sheet) EXHIBIT 1
FEE SCHEDULE FOR LABORATORY SERVICES (2025)The following contains the soils and material testing prices for services rendered by Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc. Prices are valid for 2025. Unless noted, test prices include routine sample preparation, test set-up, performance of test, calculations, and reporting of results. Please call us at (916) 933-0633 for further information.TEST TEST METHOD(S)1UNIT PRICE ($)SOILS TESTSClassification and Index PropertiesSieve Analysis, Fine with No. 200 WashSieve Analysis, Coarse and Fine CombinedPercent Passing No. 200 Sieve, SoilPercent Passing No. 200 Sieve, Rocky SampleD422, D6913, CTM 202, T88D422, D6913, CTM 202, T88D1140D1140$$ $ $145.00230.00105.00200.00EachEachEachEachHydrometer AnalysisAtterberg LimitsMoisture ContentMoisture Content & Dry DensitySpecific GravitySoil pH Pinhole DispersionOrganic ContentSoil Corrosion Properties*(*Includes Soil pH, Minimum Resistivity, Chlorides, and Sulfates)D422, D7928D4318, T89, T90D2216, D4643D7263D854D4972D4647D2974CTM 417, 422, 643$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 300.00230.0025.0050.00260.0050.00775.00155.00275.00EachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachMoisture Density Relations-CompactionProctor – 4”Proctor – 6”California ImpactCheck PointD698, D1557, T99, T180D698, D1557, T99, T180CTM 216$$ $ $325.00325.00325.00205.00EachEachEachEachStrengthUnconfined CompressionUnconfined Compression, Chemically-TreatedQuicklime Saturation (Eades and Grim)Direct Shear, 3 PointsTriaxial Shear, UUTriaxial Shear, CU (3 Points)Resistance “R-Value”Sample PreparationD2166D1633 (Mod), CTM373 (Mod)C977, D6276D3080D2850D4767 CTM 301, D2844$$ $ $ $ $ $ $200.00620.00205.00515.00250.001,700.00360.00100.00EachEachEachEachEachSetEachHourHydraulic ConductivityFlexible Wall PermeabilityPermeability (>10-3)D5084D2434$$385.00450.00EachEachConsolidation/SwellConsolidation One-Dimension Swell or Collapse One-Dimension Swell or Collapse One-Dimension Swell or Collapse Expansion IndexD2435 D4546, Method AD4546, Method BD4546, Method CD4829$$ $ $ $600.00500.00200.00600.00250.00 EachEachEachEach EachNOTES1 Test methods listed are as follows: Those beginning with a C, D, or E are ASTM International methods CTM – California Test Method, California Department of Transportation Those beginning with a T are AASHTO methods Those beginning with an MS are Asphalt Institute methods 2 Any testing where lime or cement is required to be added, cost of test may be increased by 20% 3 Rush Fee: 150% of standard unit price EXHIBIT 1
TEST TEST METHOD(S)1UNIT PRICE ($)AGGREGATETESTSSieve Analysis – Coarse (without wash)Sieve Analysis – Fine (including wash)Sieve Analysis – Coarse and Fine CombinedPercent Passing No. 200 SieveSpecific Gravity and Absorption, CoarseSpecific Gravity and Absorption, FineOrganic Impurities in SandUnit Weight, Loose or RoddedSand EquivalentCrushed Particles (fractured faces) (per sieve size) Flat and Elongated Particles (per sieve size) Clay Lumps and Friable ParticlesLos Angeles Abrasion TestDurability IndexDurability, Coarse or FineCleanness ValueMortar Sand StrengthC136, CTM 202, T27C136, CTM 202, T27C136, CTM 202, T27C117, T11C127C128C40C29CTM 217, D2419CTM 205, D5821D4791C142C131, C535CTM 229, D3744CTM 229, D3744CTM 227CTM 515, C87$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $125.00145.00230.00105.00150.00175.00100.00100.00180.00105.00105.00200.00260.00290.00145.00145.00775.00EachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachCONCRETE/MASONRY TESTSConcrete Compression (including mold)Mortar Compression (including mold)Grout Compression (including mold)CLSM Compression (including mold)Concrete Core CompressionShotcrete Core Compression (including coring)Core Height (Length/Thickness)Modulus of ElasticityFlexural Strength, BeamLaboratory Trial Batch (incl. 9 compression tests)Concrete Drying Shrinkage (set of 3)Sample Cutting and Trimming (1/4 hour minimum)CMU Dimension VerificationCMU Moisture Absorption/Unit Weight/MoistureCMU Block CompressionCMU Composite Prism CompressionCMU Core ShearC39C780C1019D4832C42C1604C1542C469C78C192C157 (Mod)C140C140C140C1314CBC 2105A.4/5$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 50.0050.00100.0070.0070.00125.0015.00350.00105.002,060.00515.00100.0075.0075.00110.00200.0060.00EachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachHourEachEachEachEachEachASPHALT CONCRETE TESTSSolvent Extraction, % AsphaltGradation of Extracted AggregateUnit Weight of Core or BriquetteThickness of CoreTheoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Rice Method)AC Moisture ContentAC Air Void DeterminationAC VFA DeterminationAC VMA DeterminationD2172, T164D5444, T30CTM 308, D2726, D1188, T166, T275D3549D2041, CTM 309, T209CTM 370, T329D3203, T269MS-2 MS-2$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $300.00180.0075.0015.00180.0055.0055.0055.0055.00EachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachEachMISCELLANEOUSFireproofing Density TestNon-Masonry Mortar/Grout Compression TestE605C579$$125.0050.00EachEachBend and Tensile Test (up to #11 bar) $ 225.00 Each EXHIBIT 1
SSPC QP5 Certified
Celebrating Thirty-Eight Years of Experience &Integrity May 6, 2025 Jeff Inferrrera ICM Group, Inc. 21 E. Natomas St. #150 Folsom, Ca 95630 Subject: 2025 Rate sheet - City of Roseville On-Call CM and Inspection Services Bay Area Coating Consultants, Inc. will provide AMPP Certified Specialty Inspectors for Coating and Concrete Inspections for the City of Roseville specification requirements. The Inspector will be tasked to ensure the surface preparation meets the contract specifications and the linings are applied as per the an AMPP Certified inspector to observe the mixing, surface preparation, application of the coating system, and final required testing. BACC will provide daily reports on the surface preparation, testing, and coating operations. BACC will follow all SSPC, NACE, AMPP, ICRI, AWWA, and ASTM current guidelines and standards. All reports will be e-mailed to you for your review. All BACC employees are confined space certified and lead awareness trained, scaffolding trained, and fit tested. The Contractor shall be responsible for safe entry into confined spaces. Building/Construction Inspector Tester Group 4 DIR Public Works Contractor (PWC) Registration No 1000005228 Expiries 6/30/2026 State of California Small Business (Micro) Public works Certification No. 61256 Expires 11/30/2026 State of California Small Business Public Works Certification No. 2005005 Expires 3/31/2026 SSPC QP-5 Certified Inspection Firm Certification 3/31/2026 Regular rate Overtime Double time Truck/equipment $134.85 per hour $202.27 per hour $269.70 per hour $10.20 per hour *Four hour minimum *24 Hour call out notification * Yearly 5% price escalation *These rates are valid until June 30, 2026 Please call if you have any questions or if you want to further discuss the information contained inside this rate sheet. Respectfully Submitted, Austin Darrimon Vice President Bay Area Coating Consultant Inc. www.bayareacoating.com EXHIBIT 1as well as NACE certified inspections.
Schedule of Rates Classification ..........................................................................Hourly RatePrincipal .................................................................................................. $165 Water Compliance Specialist ..................................................................... $144 Training Instructor ................................................................................... $144 Qualified SWPPP Developer / Inspection Auditor ......................................... $134 Qualified SWPPP Practitioner / Construction Inspector ................................. $105 Drafting Technician ................................................................................... $80 Clerical ..................................................................................................... $61 2-Person Meeting Rate ............................................................................. $181 Other Charges ................................................................................... Rate SWPPP Risk Level/Type 1 ............................................................ $2,700 each SWPPP Risk Level/Type 2 ............................................................ $2,900 each SWPPP Risk Level/Type 3 and LUP prices are based on the project. .................. NOI Preparation ............................................................................... $350 each WPCP (site visit cost is additional based on location) ..................... $1,800 each QSP Services* Risk Level/Type 1 (within service area) .................... $1,600/mo. QSP Services* Risk Level /Type 2 (within service area) ................... $1,700/mo. Overtime (after 8 hours but less than 12) ........................................... 1.5 x rate Overtime (after 12 hours) .................................................................. 2.0 x rate Mileage .......................................................................................... $0.65/mile Per Diem .......................................................................................... $184/day Printing ............................................................................................ $0.28/s.f. Additional SWPPP Copies (2 binder copies included in SWPPP cost) ........ $55 each EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT FTIMELINE1. Contractor shall complete the requested services identified in Exhibit A asfollows:1.1 TIMELINE FOR COMPLETION OF WORK EXHIBIT 1