Cities Index.
Attachment A - PowerPoint - RTD's Presentation for Jason Lee, Vice Mayor Stockton

Council Audit Committee
February 19, 2026

Document
Attachment A - PowerPoint - RTD's Presentation for Jason Lee, Vice Mayor Stockton
Meeting
February 19, 2026
Body
Council Audit Committee
Original file
1.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

RTD Update
Alex Clifford, CEO
December 2, 2025
Jason Lee, Vice Mayor Stockton

ATTACHMENT A
Who We Are and Our Service Area
• San Joaquin County’s regional
transportation provider
• Special district (not municipal transit)
as defined in PUC 50000-50507,
initially serving the Stockton
Metropolitan Area and amended in
1994 to include the entire county
• RTD services a large geographic
area:
➢ Over 1,400 square miles
➢ ~ 800,000 population
1 ATTACHMENT A
RTD Facilities
Downtown Transit Center (DTC)
Union Transfer Station (UTS)
Hammer Transfer Station (HTS)
County Transportation Center (CTC)
Regional Transportation Center (RTC)
Mall Transfer Station (MTS)
2 ATTACHMENT A
RTD – The San Joaquin County Transit Provider
A comparison of RTD to the city transit systems in San Joaquin County 3 ATTACHMENT A
RTD Local & Regional Services
RTD provides many types of services:
• Commuter service to Sacramento and Dublin BART Station • Five Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridors
• Traditional fixed-routes within the Stockton
• County and Metro Hopper deviated fixed-routes
• Shared Mobility On-Demand - Van Go! (Outside Stockton only) • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Paratransit
4 ATTACHMENT A
Post-COVID Ridership
5 ATTACHMENT A
Where Does RTD Get its Funding?
Funding Sources:
• Federal Government
• Formula and Discretionary Grants
• State Government
• Local Transportation Funds (LTF)
• State Transit Assistance Funds (STA)
• Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP)
• SB 125 (No funding received)
• Local Government
• Measure K (half-cent sales tax in San Joaquin County) • Farebox, advertising, school partnerships, property tax, etc.

Funding typically falls into one of two categories:
• Capital Funds—Formula and Discretionary
• Operating Funds—Formula (typically)
6 ATTACHMENT A
FY26 Operating & Capital Budget
7 ATTACHMENT A
SB 125
8 • July 10, 2023 - Governor Newsom signed AB 102, The Budget Act of 2023, and SB 125. $5.1 billion for transit.
• August 10, 2023 – SJCOG announced SJ County to receive $93.5 million. • January 25, 2024 - SJCOG approved a $67.8 million apportionment for FY 2024/2025 and 2025/2026. RTD was identified to receive $43.3 million (64% of funds). • June 20,2024 - RTD Board adopted its Fiscal Year 2024-25 (FY25) Budget, assigning SB 125 revenue to its operations and assigned its TDA funds to FY25 Capital Budget. • November 2024 -SJCOG received the first SB 125 allotment of $44,967,419. • July 7 and 25, 2025 - SJCOG notified RTD of its decision to deny SB 125 reimbursement request.
• After adjustment/reprioritization of projects, RTD has a FY25 Deficit of $21,340,599.
• RTD has received no SB 125 funds.

ATTACHMENT A
Measure K
• January 23, 2025 – At the SJCOG Board meeting, staff shared MK had reserves that included the following:
➢ Approximately $62.0 million in the Regional Arterials subcategory ➢ Approximately $37.8 million in the Passenger Rail subcategory ➢ Approximately $18.8 million in the Bus Transit subcategory (RTD is guaranteed to receive a minimum of 50%)
➢ Approximately $9.7 million in the Bus Rapid Transit subcategory ➢ Approximately $0.4 million in the Bicycle & Pedestrian subcategory • March 28, 2025 – SJCOG sent a letter to its partners to identify urgent MK needs. • April 11, 2025: RTD submitted five projects to SJCOG for MK urgent funding. Four projects were in the Bus Transit category, with a total funding request of $25,120,000, and one project was in the BRT category, with a funding request of $10,000,000. • July 30, 2025 - RTD received a letter from the SJCOG Executive Director notifying RTD that the Executive Committee affirmed the ineligibility of RTD’s request for MK funding. • RTD has received no MK reserves/urgent funding.
9 ATTACHMENT A
Funding Being Appealed by RTD
SB 125 :

FY25 SB 125 28,746,522$
FY26 SB 125 14,601,390
Total SB 125 Due to RTD 43,347,912$
Measure K Urgent Needs Reserves:
50% of $18.8 million under Bus Transit
subcategory 9,400,000$
100% of $9.7 million in the Bus Rapid
Transit subcategory 9,700,000
Total MK Urgent Needs Reserves Due to RTD 19,100,000$
GRAND TOTAL 62,447,912$
10 ATTACHMENT A
SJCOG’s Free Bus Transfer Program
RTD’s Core Requirements:

1. Immediate Full Fare Settlement – RTD must receive its full fare immediately when a free transfer is honored, via electronic transfer (Visa/MC-like). No advance payments.

2. No Operator Involvement – Operators shall not perform visual verification, button pushing, or issue paper transfers.

3. No Paper Transfers – Program must operate without paper slips or visual inspection.

4. Title VI Analysis - This must be led by RTD, not SJCOG, and address impacts on seniors, people with disabilities, and discount programs.

5. Countywide Application – Applies to all operators and includes RTD-to-RTD transfers.

6. Program Duration – Not a pilot. SJCOG must commit funding through the end of Measure K.

7. Funding Source Restrictions - It cannot be funded from MK Bus Transit or BRT categories.

8. Technology Platform - This is likely feasible only via the Vamos app and contactless payments via Masabi validators.
11 ATTACHMENT A
RTD

THANK YOU
12 ATTACHMENT A

← All documents from this meeting