Cities Index.
Attachment K - Comment Letter/City Response

City Council and Concurrent Authorities
July 7, 2026

Document
Attachment K - Comment Letter/City Response
Meeting
July 7, 2026
Body
City Council and Concurrent Authorities
Pages
2
Original file
15.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

May 29, 2026
Via Email
Mayor Christina Fugazi
Vice Mayor Lee
Councilmember Padilla
Councilmember Ponce
Councilmember Blower
Councilmember Enriquez
Councilmember Villapudua
City Council
City of Stockton
425 N El Dorado Street, 2nd
Floor
Stockton, CA 95202
Katherine Roland, City Clerk
City Clerk’s Office
City of Stockton
425 N El Dorado St, 1st Floor
Stockton, CA 95202
[email protected]
Nicole D. Moore, Contract Planner
City of Stockton
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Phone: (209) 937-8561
[email protected]
Re: Request for Extension of Hearing for the Bear Creek South Residential Project Dear Mayor Fugazi, Vice Mayor Lee, Honorable Councilmembers, Ms. Roland, and Ms. Moore:

I am writing on behalf of Laborers International Union of North America, Local No. 73 (“LIUNA”) and its members living and working in and around the City of Stockton to request that the City not hold a public hearing for the Bear Creek Residential Project (“Project”) until thirty days from the date all supporting documents are made available for review. This request is made pursuant to the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6250 et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Section 21092(b)(1) which requires that “all documents referenced in the [CEQA document]” be available for review during the entire comment period.

The biological resources section of the 15183 Checklist for the Project references a field survey conducted to establish existing conditions of the site and verify information obtained in the pre-field investigation. However, the referenced survey results are not publicly available. On behalf of our clients, we requested a copy of this field survey on May 28, 2026. On May 29, 2026, the City Clerk confirmed that our request was being processed pursuant to the Public Records Act, but we have not yet received those documents.

CEQA section 21092(b)(1) and CEQA Guidelines section 15087(c) require that a CEQA notice must include “the address where copies of the [CEQA document], and all documents Attachment K
May 29, 2026
Review Period Extension Request

Page 2 of 2 ends

referenced in the [CEQA document], are available for review.” As noted by leading CEQA commentators, Remy and Thomas:

The above-referenced section [21092(b)(1)] requires the agency to notify the public of the address at which “all documents referenced in [the CEQA document]” can be found (and presumably read) . . . seems to require agencies to make available for public review all documents on which agency staff or consultants expressly rely in preparing the [CEQA document]. In light of case law emphasizing the importance of ensuring that the public can obtain and review documents on which agencies rely for the environmental conclusions (see, e.g., Emmington v. Solano County Redevel. Agency, 195 Cal.App.3d 491, 502-503 (1987)), agencies should ensure that they comply literally with this requirement.

Remy, Thomas and Moose, Guide to the California Environmental Quality Act, p. 293 (Solano Press, 1999). The courts have held that “material not contained in the [CEQA document] cannot be expected to be considered, and therefore, cannot be relied upon to support an adequate [CEQA document].” People ex rel. Bonta v. Cnty. of Lake, 105 Cal. App. 5th 1222, 1232 (2024).

In fact, the courts have also held that the failure to provide even a few pages of a CEQA document for a portion of the CEQA review period invalidates the entire CEQA process.

Ultramar v. South Coast Air Quality Man. Dist., 17 Cal.App.4th 689 (1993).

By failing to provide “all documents referenced” in the 15183 Checklist for public review, the City is violating the procedural mandates of CEQA. Therefore, we request that the City not schedule a hearing for this Project until at least thirty days from the date the documents are made available. Please contact me as soon as possible with your response to this request.

Sincerely,

Aleja Cretcher
Lozeau Drury LLP
Attachment K
From: Aleja Cretcher
To: CC - City Clerk
Subject: Document Request: 15183 Checklist Bear Creek South Project Date: Thursday, May 28, 2026 10:57:00 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Stockton. Do not click any links or open attachments if this is unsolicited email.

Good morning,
I hope this email finds you well! I am reaching out about the 15183 Consistency Checklist for the Bear Creek South Residential Project. On page 63, the Checklist says “The Project site was subject to a field survey by De Novo Principal Biologist Steve McMurtry on April 18, and again on May 9, 2022.” However, there is no available report and no summary of species detected during the surveys.

Could you please send me this report? If you also have the qualifications of the biologist, that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much.

Best,
Aleja Cretcher
--
Aleja M. Cretcher
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison St., Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
Office: 510.836.4200
Mobile: 650.281.9940
[email protected]
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachment(s) may contain privileged or confidential information.

Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited by law. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

Attachment K
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP | SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE
CORPORATE ADDRESS: 1020 SUNCAST LANE, SUITE 106, EL DORADO HILLS, CA 95762 smcmurtry@denovoplannin g.com | (916) 580-9818

STEVE MCMURTRY

PRINCIPAL/BIOLOGIST
Mr. McMurtry is a Principal and Biologist with De Novo Planning Group and is responsible for project management, preparation of biological assessments, natural environmental studies, wetland delineations, special status species surveys, botanical surveys, water quality reports, federal Incidental Take Perm its (Section 7/Section 10), California Incidental Take Permits (Section 2800), Section 404 Permits, Section 401 Wate r Quality Certifications, Section 1600 Stream Bed Alteration Agreements, Biological Monitoring, and Construction Worker E ducation. Mr. McMurtry has extensive experience working for local, state, and federal agencies, and currently serves as an on-call Biologist for various governmental agencies in California. Mr. McMurtry also has experience providing litigation support and expert witness testimony for biological topics in court. Mr. McMurtry graduated from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo with a bachelor’s degree in Natural Resource Management with graduate studies in Biological Sciences at San Jose State University. His college coursework includes plant taxonomy, dendrology, wildlife biology, conservation biology, ecology, evolutionary biology, genetics, soil science, hydrology, forest sciences, and natural resource management. He has received the appropriate education and certificates to qualify as a wetland delineator. The CDFW has issued Mr. McMurtry a Plant Collecting Permit under the California Endangered Species Act.

REGULATORY PERMITS/QUALIFICATION DESIGNATIONS
CDFW Plant Voucher Collecting Permit (2081(s)-21-004-V
SJCOG SJMSCP Qualified Biologist (USFWS/CDFW approved HCP/NCCP)  Have processed numerous coverage surveys, precon-surveys, and bio reports for SJCOG serving as administrator of the HCP/NCCP. Also been involved in authorized burrowing owl evictions.

Yolo HCP/NCCP Qualified Biologist Certification (USFWS/CDFW approved HCP/NCCP)  Planning-level habitat surveys (includes land cover mapping and identification of species habitat)  Palmate-bracted bird’s beak planning-level species surveys  Valley elderberry longhorn beetle planning-level species surveys  Swainson’s hawk and white-tailed kite pre-construction surveys and construction monitoring  Western burrowing owl planning-level surveys for occupied habitat and preconstruction surveys

RELEVANT TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE
 Plant/Vegetation Qualifying Training: Botanical training has been received through university classwork and field work over the past approximately 25 years. Plant taxonomy classwork involved training in the taxonomic relations and classification of ferns, conifers and flowering plants, with practice in their collection and identification. Techniques included cytotaxonomy, chemotoxonomy, palynology and numerical taxonomy. I Received classroom and field instruction in the use and application of The Jepson Manual, Higher Plants of California (Hickman 1993), which is still the authoritative plant key used in botanical surveys today in California.

Taxonomy training also involved work in the Carl W. Sharsmith Herbarium at San Jose State University. Other classroom work involved studying plant ecology, species composition and vegetation structure of California plant communities. Classwork included the origins, history and changes brought about by natural succession and human impact. Rodney Myatt, PhD, was graduate professor at San Jose State University and provided both classroom training, as well as field training at various locations throughout California, including various Central Valley wetland complexes (Jepson prairie, Mather wetland preserve, Colusa NWR). Has significant undergraduate classroom training at CalPoly San Luis Obispo, with field training at CalPoly’s outdoor laboratory at Swanton Pacific Ranch located in Davenport. Has classwork in dendrology which focused on the identification, classification, silvical characteristics, distribution, environmental requirements and economic importance of woody plants in shru b, woodland, and forest ecosystems of the United States. The training Attachment K
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP | SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE
CORPORATE ADDRESS: 1020 SUNCAST LANE, SUITE 106, EL DORADO HILLS, CA 95762 smcmurtry@denovoplannin g.com | (916) 580-9818
emphasized species located in the Pacific Coastal, Sierran, and Casc ade ecosystems. Doug Piirto, PhD, was professor at CalPoly and provided both classroom training, as well as field training at various locations throughout the coast of California (San Luis Obispo and Santa Cruz counties).  Ornithological Qualifying Training: Training with raptors is a combination of classroom training and field work under a variety of biologists while employed with the United States Forest Service, EMC Planning Group, and Quad Knopf. Training involved classification and identification of birds, with emphasis on California species. The focus involved the functional morphology, physiology , ecology, behavior and ce nsus methods. The most extensive field work was spent with Cara Galloway, MA Biologist EMC Planning Group, Janet Walther, MS Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group, and Wes Rhodehamel, MA VP Biological Resources Quad Knopf on projects in the Monterey Bay Region, Salinas Valley, Central Valley, and Sierra Nevada range. Has extensive observations of Swainson’s hawk, burrowing owl, bald eagle, osprey, peregrine falcon, Cooper’s hawk, northern goshawk, northern spotted owl, great grey owl, and many other more common raptor species. Has extensive observations of yellow warbler, tri-colored black bird, least Bell’s vireo, willow flycatcher, and other special status birds.
 Herpetology Qualifying Experience: Herpetology training has been received through mostly field work over the past approximately 25 years. The most extensive field work was spent performing habitat assessments and visual encounter surveys for California red legged frog under Cara Galloway, MA Biologist EMC Planning Group, Janet Walther, MS Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group, on projects in the Coastal range. These included observations of egg masses, tadpoles, juveniles, and adults of CRLF. Has observed California tiger salamander egg masses and adults under Cara Galloway, MA in Gilroy, Ca, and CTS egg masses at a documented CTS site in Manteca. In a non-working environment, has experience observing adult Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog at Highland lakes in Desolation Wilderness, and in smal l mountain ponds south of Donahue Pass in the Inyo National Forest. Has observed foothill yellow-legged frog in several drainage locations proximate to Union Valley Reservoir and Ice House Reserv oir in the El Dorado National Fo rest. Has a signif icant number of observations of reptiles native to the Mojave Desert of southern California and western Nevada, including the desert tortoise.
 Bat Qualifying Experience: Bat experience is through non-contact field work over the past approximately 25 years. The early field work was spent performing habitat assessments and non-contact surveys for bats under Cara Galloway, MA Biologist EMC Planning Group, Janet Walther, MS Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group, on projects in the Coastal range. These included observat ions utilization both non-acoustical and acoustical methods. Non-acoustical surveying relied on spotlight, "peeper" mirrors, borescopes to look for indications of use such as guano, staining, bat smells for an visual confirmation of active occupancy. Acoustical methods relied on the use of bat detectors for acoustical confirmations of presence. More current field work has been limited to habitat assessments and visual detection techniques.  Legal Expert Witness Qualifications
o Qualified as a Biological Expert Witness in Fresno County Superior Court: Rio Mesa Holdings, LLC v.

Fidelity National Title
o Qualified as a Biological Expert Witness in Sonoma County Superior Court: Adobe Investments, LLC v.

Chicago Title Company

Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K
Attachment K

← All documents from this meeting