Agenda — Suisun City City Council, March 19, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
WHERAS, On February 27, 2024, a public hearing was held to contemplate the proposed General
Plan Amendment and after deliberations, the Planning Commission voted 1-3 to denying the proposed General Plan Amendment.

WHEREAS, the City of Suisun City has conducted an environmental analysis to remove the
Railroad Avenue realignment from Railroad Avenue/Humphrey Drive to Olive Avenue from the General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network Diagram meets all criteria for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, exceptions to the applicability of a Categorical Exemption, as specified in Section 15300.2(a) through (f) of the State CEQA Guidelines, do not apply to the project. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301; and WHEREAS, after due consideration of all materials and testimony, and using its independent judgment,
the City Council desires to amend the Geneal Plan Vehicular Transportation Diagram removing the Railroad Avenue realignment connecting to Olive Avenue.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Suisun City
, exercising its independent judgment as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council finds no substantial new evidence in the record and that the City of Suisun City has conducted an environmental analysis to remove the Railroad Avenue realignment from Railroad Avenue/Humphrey Drive to Olive Avenue from the General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network Diagram and concludes as specified in Section 15300.2(a) through (f) of the State CEQA Guidelines, do not apply to the project. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301; and

3. A review of the General Plan Transportation Chapter policies which are relevant to the potential elimination of Railroad Avenue east end realignment indicates that the elimination of the realignment would not cause internal inconsistencies within the General Plan Transportation Element and the amendment is consistent with the General Plan policies. Specifically,
Policy T-1.3: The City’s Level of Service policy will be implemented in consideration of the need for pedestrian and bicycle access, the need for emergency vehicle access, and policies designed to reduce vehicle miles travelled.

The operations analysis finds that the current network configuration, with signalization at East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road and East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue, can be reasonably expected to serve traffic acceptably in the long term. Therefore, assuming these improvements are made (when traffic conditions indicate they are needed), eliminating the realignment is consistent with Policy T-1.3.
149
Resolution No. 2024-
Adopted

Page 3 of 3 ends

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Policy T-2.5: The City prefers direct connections that allow cars, bikes and pedestrian through traffic over “doglegs” or “T” intersections.

The current connection of Railroad Avenue to East Tabor Avenue is a “T” intersection, with Railroad Avenue terminating at East Tabor Avenue. As such, the current configuration is a more direct connection between these two arterial roadways than the connection with the realignment, which would require drivers to use Olive Avenue to travel between East Tabor Avenue and Railroad Avenue.

Therefore, eliminating the realignment is consistent with P olicy T-2.5.

Policy T-6.1: The City will facilitate construction and maintenance of an accessible, safe, pleasant, convenient, and integrated bicycle and pedestrian system that connects local destinations and surrounding communities. The City will support development of a safe and accessible trail network connected to the on-street bicycle and transportation system that provides transportation and recreational opportunities for Suisun City residents and employees.

If the Railroad Avenue realignment is removed from the General Plan, the City would need
to update the General Plan Bicycle/Pedestrian Transportation Diagram (Exhibit 4-5) to show the proposed future bike lanes (blue dashed line) extending on the existing Railroad Avenue to East Tabor Avenue. This would provide bicycle network connectivity that is equivalent to the connectivity shown on the current Bicycle/Pedestrian Transportation Diagram. The addition of traffic signals at the East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue intersection would improve the safe movement of bicycles and pedestrians from Railroad Avenue onto East Tabor Avenue.

4. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Suisun City
held on Tuesday the 19th day of March 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 19th day of March 2024.

Anita Skinner
City Clerk
150
GENERAL PLAN 2035 – VEHICULAR TRANSPORTATION DIAGRAM (CURRENT CONDITION) Proposed General Plan Amendment
151
GENERAL PLAN 2035 – VEHICULAR TRANSPORTATION DIAGRAM (PROPOSED CONDITION) Proposed General Plan Amendment
152
100 Pringle Avenue | Suite 600 | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | (925) 930-7100 | Fax (925) 933-7090 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: June 24, 2020
To: Matt Medill and John Kearns, City of Suisun City
From: Ellen Poling and Inder Grewal, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Evaluation of the Feasibility of Eliminating the General Plan Railroad Avenue Realignment at East Tabor Avenue
WC20-3684.00
Introduction
The City of Suisun City has requested an evaluation of the feasibility of removing the Railroad Avenue realignment from East Tabor Avenue to Olive Avenue from the General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network. The General Plan’s realignment would eliminate the East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue intersection, and route Railroad Avenue to the east to Olive Avenue. To determine the feasibility of removing the realignment from the network, it is necessary to determine whether the current roadway network configuration in the Railroad Avenue/East Tabor Avenue area can be made to function acceptably in terms of traffic operations (peak hour levels of service and vehicle queuing) and associated collision potential given the railroad tracks proximity.

Consideration of the elimination of this realignment plan requires the following analyses:
• Review of the collision history and intersection operations, to determine if the proximity of the East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue intersection to the railroad tracks may be related to collisions which would be correctible by removing this intersection. • A future conditions (2035) traffic operations analysis, consistent with the year analyzed in the Suisun City General Plan EIR, that includes the proposed residential development and access plan for the undeveloped land bounded by Olive Avenue to the east and Almond Tree Storage to the north; and
153
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 2 of 12 ends

• An assessment of how eliminating the realignment affects connectivity and mobility in northern Suisun City for all modes, and a General Plan policy consistency evaluation.

The study area is shown in Figure 1 (all figures are attached at the end of this memorandum).

The discussion below covers the following topics:

I. Data Collection
II. Operations Evaluation
III. Collision Evaluation
IV. General Plan Consistency
V. Findings
I. Data Collection
Fehr & Peers contracted with a traffic count vendor to collect AM and PM two -hour peak period intersection turning movement counts of vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians at the following intersections on Wednesday, March 11th and Thursday, March 12th (note these counts were conducted before the COVID-19 shelter in place order):

1. East Tabor Avenue at Clay Bank Road

2. East Tabor Avenue at Railroad Avenue

3. East Tabor Avenue at Olive Avenue
The study area, including intersections and the proposed Railroad Avenue realignment, is shown in Figure 1. In addition to intersection turning movement counts, train crossing data was collected from 6 AM to 6 PM on Wednesday, March 11th and Thursday, March 12th. Train crossing data included time of occurrence, direction of travel, and barrier down time. The count data is included in Attachment 1. Fehr & Peers also conducted a field review to obtain intersection lane configurations, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and observe peak period conditions, including conditions with a Capitol Corridor train crossing.

Traffic, Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes
The existing traffic, pedestrian and bicycle volumes at the three study intersections are shown in Figure 2. Peak hour traffic volumes are heaviest on westbound East Tabor Avenue in the morning, and on eastbound East Tabor Avenue in the afternoon. On Railroad Avenue at East 154
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 3 of 12 ends

Tabor Avenue, volumes are roughly the same in the AM and PM peak hours, at about 320 vehicles. Pedestrian and bicycle volumes are low at the three intersections.

Railroad Crossings
The railroad crossing across East Tabor Avenue between Railroad Avenue and Clay Bank Road hosts several rail services. Primarily, the rail line serves Capitol Corridor Amtrak services and acts as a Union Pacific mainline, carrying several freight trains a day. Additionally, Amtrak’s less - frequent California Zephyr and Coast Starlight services also use this line. The Capitol Corridor trains are typically five cars long; the Zephyr and Coast Starlight trains are typically 12-15 cars long. As freight schedules are not available, the counts referenced above and field observations were used to estimate a rough frequency and duration of gate-down times. Table 1 summarizes the resulting estimated rail traffic frequency and gate-down times assumed in the traffic operations analysis in Section II.

Table 1: Rail Traffic Description (From 2-Day Count and Field Observations) Service
Crossing Time
Gate-Down Time 7-9 AM 4-6 PM
3/11/2020 3/12/2020 3/11/2020 3/12/2020
Passenger
7:15
7:37
7:42
8:13
7:02
7:43
7:55
8:14
8:22
4:07
4:17
4:50
5:25
5:28
4:14
4:49
5:18
30 seconds - 1 minute
Union Pacific Freight 7:12
7:23
4:18
4:35 4:27 45 seconds – 3.5
minutes
Source: Fehr & Peers, March 2020.

II. Operations Evaluation
Existing Conditions
Intersection operations are described using the term “Level of Service” (LOS), a quantitative measure of the average delay experienced by a driver at the intersection. LOS ranges from LOS A, with no congestion and little delay, to LOS F, with excessive congestion and delay. Table 2 provides ranges of delay and volume-to-capacity ratios that correspond to vehicular LOS at intersections.
155
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 4 of 12 ends

The traffic operations analysis uses the Synchro and Synchro/SimTraffic 10.0 software, based on the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (2010 HCM). Intersection operation inputs include vehicle and pedestrian volumes, lane geometry, signal phasing and timing, pedestrian crossing times, and peak hour factors. To approximate conditions with typical train traffic, ensuring a reasonably conservative analysis, is was assumed that three passenger trains and one Union Pacific freight train cross East Tabor Avenue during each peak hour. These events were represented in the traffic simulation through a dummy intersection representing the railroad tracks, at which a red light indication is given to all eastbound and westbound traffic on East Tabor Avenue for 90 seconds every 14.5 minutes.

Table 2: Level of Service Definitions – Intersections
Level of Service
Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections
Delay
(seconds/vehicle)
Volume-to-
Capacity Ratio
(V/C)
Delay
(seconds/vehicle)
Volume-to-
Capacity Ratio
(V/C)
A < 10.0 < 1.0 < 10.0 < 1.0
B > 10.0 to 20.0 < 1.0 > 10.0 to 15.0 < 1.0
C > 20.0 to 35.0 < 1.0 > 15.0 to 25.0 < 1.0
D > 35.0 to 55.0 < 1.0 > 25.0 to 35.0 < 1.0
E > 55.0 to 80.0 < 1.0 > 35.0 to 50.0 < 1.0
F > 80.0 > 1.0 > 50.0 > 1.0
Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual.

The existing levels of service are shown in Table 3. The SimTraffic results are included in Attachment 2. The intersections of East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road and East Tabor Avenue/Olive Avenue operate at LOC C or better in both peak hours. The intersection of East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue operates at LOS E in the AM peak hour, with the stop-controlled Railroad Avenue approach operating at LOS F. In the PM peak hour, the intersection operates at LOS A, with LOS D for the Railroad Avenue approach. As seen in field observations, when trains cross East Tabor Avenue during the peak hours, queues form on East Tabor Avenue and on Railroad Avenue.
156
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 5 of 12 ends

Table 3: Intersection Levels of Service — Existing Conditions Location Control Peak Hour
Existing Conditions
Delay (seconds)1 LOS1

1. East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road All-Way
Stop
AM 16 C
PM 9 A

2. East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue Side-street
Stop
AM 41 (>80) E (F)
PM 6 (29) A (D)

3. East Tabor Avenue/Olive Avenue Side-Street
Stop
AM 3 (32) A (D)
PM 2 (16) A (B)
Notes:

1. For all-way stop controlled intersections, the average intersection delay and LOS is calculated. For side-street stop controlled intersections, the average delay and LOS is listed first followed by the delay and LOS for the worst movement or approach in parentheses. Bold indicates below-standard service level.

Source: Fehr & Peers, June 2020.

Future Conditions
Future Traffic Forecast
Because the proposed removal of the realigned Railroad Avenue would affect traffic conditions over the long term, the operations of the current configuration (without the realignment) were tested under Cumulative (2035) conditions. Two components of traffic growth were estimated:
• Traffic growth associated with development of the vacant land located south of Railroad Avenue and west of Olive Avenue
• Other traffic growth from Suisun City and Fairfield development to the year 2035, as estimated in the Suisun City General Plan EIR
Adjacent Land Development Traffic Growth
Based on direction from City staff, the proposed Olive Ranch development east of Railroad Avenue is approximately 9.75 acres and would be developed with a total of 70 single-family dwelling units. Fehr & Peers employed the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition to estimate trip generation for this development. Table 4 presents the trip generation estimate. 157
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 6 of 12 ends

Table 4: Adjacent Development Trip Generation
Use (Amount)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
Single Family Detached (70
Units) 13 39 52 42 21 63 661
Source: ITE Trip Generation, 10th Edition (land use code 210).

Trips were distributed to the study network based on trip distribution assumptions from the 2008 Suisun Station Study. Access to Olive Ranch would be provided via Olive Avenue.

Background Suisun City/Fairfield Traffic Growth
To reflect regional and other local traffic growth in the study area, intersection peak hour turning movement volumes were increased to reflect 2035 conditions consistent with the forecasts prepared for the Suisun City General Plan EIR. The volumes were developed by adjusting the existing (2020) turning movement counts to roughly match the 2035 segment volumes from the General Plan EIR, allocating the growth to the individual turning movements proportionally to the existing turning movement proportions.

Future (2040) Traffic Forecasts
The 2040 traffic forecasts discussed above are shown in Figure 3. The SimTraffic results are included in Attachment 2.

Analysis Results
Table 5 shows cumulative intersection LOS results. Under cumulative conditions, the all-way stop controlled intersection of East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road is projected to operate at LOS D and E in the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The intersection of East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue is projected to operate at LOS F in the AM peak hour and E in the PM peak hour, with the side-street stop-controlled Railroad Avenue approach operating at LOS F in both peak hours.

This results from the effect of the train crossings and turning movements at East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue, which cause queues to periodically spill back and prevent some of the traffic demand on Railroad Avenue from being served. At East Tabor Avenue/Olive Avenue, the overall intersection LOS is A in both peak hours, but the side-street stop-controlled Olive Avenue approach is projected to operate at LOS F in the AM peak hour. 158
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 7 of 12 ends

The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices peak hour signal warrants 3A/3B were checked for all three intersections. Warrant 3B is met under both existing and cumulative conditions for the intersections of East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road and East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue. The warrants are not met in either case for the intersection of East Tabor Avenue/Olive Avenue.

Table 5: Intersection Levels of Service — Cumulative Conditions Location Control Peak Hour
Cumulative Conditions:

No Realignment
Full Traffic Growth
Avg. Delay
(seconds)1 LOS1

1. East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank
Road
All-Way
Stop
AM 32 D
PM 42 E

2. East Tabor Avenue/ Railroad
Avenue
Side-street
Stop
AM 57 (>80) F (F)
PM 37 (>80) E (F)

3. East Tabor Avenue/Olive
Avenue
Side-Street
Stop
AM 7 (>80) A (F)
PM 3 (28) A (D)
Notes:

Source: Fehr & Peers, June 2020.

Traffic Signalization Assessment
Fehr & Peers conducted a preliminary test of operations with traffic signals installed at East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road and East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue, with appropriate controls to accommodate the railroad crossings. Our preliminary analysis of the installation of traffic signals indicates that the current network configuration in the study area would operate at acceptable levels under cumulative conditions, with signalization at these two intersections. While the stop- controlled approach at East Tabor Avenue/Olive Avenue would operate at LOS F in both peak hours, the intersection would operate at LOS C during the morning peak hour and LOS B during the evening peak hour.
159
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 8 of 12 ends

This preliminary test does not constitute a comprehensive simulation and evaluation of operations with signals at the two intersections. Therefore, it is recommended that the City further investigate the potential signalization of East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road and East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue, including running a full simulation and examination of the optimal signal placement, signal coordination, signal timing, and special phasing features such as queue cutter phasing to prevent vehicle queues from spilling back to the railroad tracks.

III. Collision Evaluation
Collision History
Collision data for the area surrounding the study intersection was pulled from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Report System (SWITRS), which details the location and characteristics of collisions. Table 6 presents a summary of collisions for the years 2011-2018.

Table 6: Collisions by Year by Category
Collisions
Complete Data
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Type
Head-On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sideswipe 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rear End 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
Broadside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Hit Object 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Overturned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Severity
PDO1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 3
Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Severe Injury 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moderate Injury 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minor Injury 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Modes Involved
Non-Collision 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Motor Vehicle 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 3
MV Other Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
160
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 9 of 12 ends

Table 6: Collisions by Year by Category
Collisions
Complete Data
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Parked MV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Train 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Animal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fixed Object 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Object 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1. PDO = property damage only.

The years 2012-2015 saw no crashes in the area. There were seven crashes between 2016-2018, resulting on property damage only. There were no collisions involving bicycles nor pedestrians.

Collision Rates
Expected collision rates were developed for the three intersections and two adjoining segments based on Highway Safety Manual 2010 methodology. Table 7 shows the predicted and actual collision rates.

Due to the small sample size and the limited scope of the network, these results should not be considered absolute. However, based on this data, the actual crash rate is below what is predicted by the Highway Safety Manual.

Table 7: Predicted and Actual Crash Rates
Facility Type Predicted Rate Actual
Intersections1
East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue
Total 3.80 1.00
Fatal/Injury 1.22 0
PDO2 2.58 1.00

1. Intersection collisions were defined as being within 150 feet of the intersection

2. PDO = property damage only.
161
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 10 of 12 ends

IV. General Plan Consistency
The discussion below evaluates whether eliminating the realignment is consistent with General Plan policy. To ensure that the General Plan remains internally consistent, the elimination of the realignment should not adversely affect the City’s ability to implement these policies.

Policy T-1.3: The City’s Level of Service policy will be implemented in consideration of the need for pedestrian and bicycle access, the need for emergency vehicle access, and policies designed to reduce vehicle miles travelled.

Policy T-2.5: The City prefers direct connections that allow cars, bikes and pedestrian through traffic over “doglegs” or “T” intersections.

If the Railroad Avenue realignment is removed from the General Plan, the City would need to update the General Plan Bicycle/Pedestrian Transportation Diagram (Exhibit 4-5) to show the proposed future bike lanes (blue dashed line) extending on the existing Railroad Avenue to East Tabor Avenue. This would provide bicycle network connectivity that is equivalent to the connectivity shown on the current Bicycle/Pedestrian Transportation Diagram. The addition of 162
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 11 of 12 ends

traffic signals at the East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue intersection would improve the safe movement of bicycles and pedestrians from Railroad Avenue onto East Tabor Avenue.

V. Findings
Traffic Operations
The traffic operations analysis presented above indicates that the current network configuration and control in the study area is currently operating at acceptable levels, but would deteriorate to unacceptable service levels with excessive queueing in the cumulative condition. When accounting for the development of the vacant property south of Railroad Avenue and west of Olive Avenue, along with other regional and local development growth, the current network configuration would not serve traffic acceptably.

To assess whether traffic signals would improve operations in the cumulative condition, we ran a preliminary simulation with traffic signals installed at East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road and East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue. Our preliminary analysis indicates that the current network configuration in the study area would operate at acceptable levels under cumulative conditions, with traffic signals installed.

If the City desires to remove the Railroad Avenue realignment from the General Plan network, i t is recommended that the City further investigate the installation of traffic signals at East Tabor Avenue/Clay Bank Road and East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue. This would involve running a full simulation and examination of the optimal signal placement, signal coordination , signal timing, and special phasing features such as queue cutter phasing to prevent vehicle queues from spilling back to the railroad tracks.

Collision History
The observed collision rates in the study area do not indicate a systemic safety problem in the study area associated with the roadway configuration that would be resolved or improved by removing the East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue intersection and relocating Railroad Avenue to connect to Olive Avenue. Instead, collision data reveals that high speeds are a primary factor in collisions in the study area. Literature compiled by the Federal Highway Administration indicates that the addition of traffic signals would reduce approach speeds and eliminate potential conflicts between vehicles turning onto East Tabor Avenue from Railroad Avenue and through vehicle movements on East Tabor Avenue. The reduction of speeds and the elimination of turning conflicts would improve safety conditions in the study area. 163
Matt Medill and John Kearns
June 24, 2020

Page 12 of 12 ends

General Plan Consistency
A review of the General Plan Transportation Chapter policies which are relevant to the potential elimination of the Railroad Avenue east end realignment indicates that the elimination of the realignment would not cause internal inconsistencies within the General Plan Transportation Element.

This concludes Fehr & Peers’ evaluation of the feasibility of eliminating the realignment of Railroad Avenue at East Tabor Avenue. Please call Ellen Poling if you have any questions about this memorandum.

Attachments:

Figure 1: Project Study Area
Figure 2: Existing Conditions – Traffic, Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes, Lane Configurations, and Traffic Controls
Figure 3: Cumulative Conditions – Traffic, Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes, Lane Configurations, and Traffic Controls
Attachment 1 – Traffic Counts
Attachment 2 – SimTraffic Results
164
Clay Bank Rd
East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
Olive Ave
Humphrey Dr
Worley Rd
Meadowlark Dr
Davis Dr
Air Base Pkwy

SUISUN CITY

FAIRFIELD
1 2
3 WC20-3684_1_StudyArea
Project Study Area
Figure 1
Study Intersection General Plan Network Railroad Avenue RealignmentRailroad Grade Crossing #
165
CF324 (355)
191 (158)
BC
495 (304)
285 (152)
AF116 (92)
206 (230)
❷ Railroad Ave/East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave East Tabor Ave
AC148 (200)
189 (269)
AF
269 (178)
326 (244)
CF
318 (186)
293 (210)
❶ Clay Bank Rd/East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave
Clay Bank Rd
Clay Bank Rd
CF0 (3)
0 (0)
AC
2 (2)
0 (0)
AC0 (0)
0 (0)
CF
0 (0)
1 (0)
AF0 (0)
0 (0)
❷ Railroad Ave/East Tabor Ave
AF
❶ Clay Bank Rd/East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave
0 (2)
Auto Bicycle Pedestrian
❸ Olive Ave/East Tabor Ave ❸ Olive Ave/East Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
Railroad Ave
CF511 (547)
19 (38)
B753 (436)
9 (10)
G27 (20)
16 (10)
East Tabor Ave East Tabor Ave
CF1 (2)
0 (0)
AC
1 (2)
0 (0)
AF0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (6)
Olive Ave
Olive Ave 0 (0)
1 (0)
11 (4)
0 (1)
4 (7)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Clay Bank Rd
East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
Olive Ave
Humphrey Dr
Worley Rd
Meadowlark Dr
Davis Dr
Air Base Pkwy

SUISUN CITY

FAIRFIELD
1 2
3 WC20-3684_1_StudyArea
Project Study Area
Figure 1
Study Intersection General Plan Network Railroad Avenue RealignmentRailroad Grade Crossing #
Clay Bank Rd
East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
Olive Ave
Humphrey Dr
Worley Rd
Meadowlark Dr
Davis Dr
Air Base Pkwy

SUISUN CITY

FAIRFIELD
1 2
3 WC20-3684_1_StudyArea
Project Study Area
Figure 1
Study Intersection General Plan Network Railroad Avenue RealignmentRailroad Grade Crossing #
Existing Conditions
Traffic, Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes, Lane Configurations, and Traffic Controls Figure 2
WC20-3684_2_Vol_Existing
Study Intersection
Stop Sign
#
AM (PM) Peak Hour
Pedestrian Volumes
AM (PM) Peak Hour
Bicycle Volumes
Intersection Lane Con/f_iguration and
AM/PM Peak Hour Traﬃc Volumes

X (Y)X (Y)
General Plan Network Railroad
Avenue RealignmentRailroad Grade Crossing
X (Y)
166
CF387 (515)
223 (221)
BC
607 (438)
333 (213)
AF135 (128)
241 (324)
❷ Railroad Ave/East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave East Tabor Ave
AC170 (277)
235 (398)
AF
309 (246)
375 (338)
CF
366 (257)
376 (309)
❶ Clay Bank Rd/East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave
Clay Bank Rd
Clay Bank Rd
❷ Railroad Ave/East Tabor Ave
❶ Clay Bank Rd/East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave
Auto Bicycle Pedestrian
❸ Olive Ave/East Tabor Ave ❸ Olive Ave/East Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
Railroad Ave
CF602 (758)
26 (81)
B880 (609)
14 (28)
G60 (42)
29 (21)
East Tabor Ave East Tabor Ave
Olive Ave
Olive Ave
CF0 (3)
0 (0)
AC
2 (2)
0 (0)
AC0 (0)
0 (0)
CF
0 (0)
1 (0)
AF0 (0)
0 (0)
AF
CF1 (2)
0 (0)
AC
1 (2)
0 (0)
AF0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (2)
0 (6)
0 (0)
1 (0)
11 (4)
0 (1)
4 (7)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Clay Bank Rd
East Tabor Ave
East Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
Olive Ave
Humphrey Dr
Worley Rd
Meadowlark Dr
Davis Dr
Air Base Pkwy

SUISUN CITY

FAIRFIELD
1 2
3 WC20-3684_1_StudyArea
Project Study Area
Figure 1
Study Intersection General Plan Network Railroad Avenue RealignmentRailroad Grade Crossing #
Cumulative Conditions
Traffic, Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes, Lane Configurations, and Traffic Controls Figure 3
WC20-3684_3_Vol_Cumu
Study Intersection
Stop Sign
#
AM (PM) Peak Hour
Pedestrian Volumes
AM (PM) Peak Hour
Bicycle Volumes
Intersection Lane Con/f_iguration and
AM/PM Peak Hour Traﬃc Volumes

X (Y)X (Y)
General Plan Network Railroad
Avenue RealignmentRailroad Grade Crossing
X (Y)
167
Attachment 1
Traffic Counts
168
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
2 1
4 5
7 4
6 4
33 20
90 1 8 4 0 7
12 14
Peak Hour 5 15 0 10 30 4 3
3 0 2 14 7 0Count Total 15 24 0 20 59 9
0 0 22 0 0 0 2 28:45 AM 3 4 0 5 12
1 3 1 0 2 3
4 8:30 AM 6 3 0 1 10 2 0 0
0 1 3 0 0 0
2 3
8:15 AM 2 6 0 3 11 2 0
0 0 0 0 2 0
0 1 2
8:00 AM 0 3 0 2 5 0
1 2 0 0 3 2
0 4 0
0 7:30 AM 1 3 0 2 6 1 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 1
0 2 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 2 3 0 3 8
0 2 0
- - -HV% - 1% 2% - -
2 0
7:15 AM 1 0 0 4 5 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
West North South
7:00 AM 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 326 00 0 0 291 318 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
- - 2% - 1% 2%- 3% 2%
Peak
Hour
All 0 148 189
482 0 0 0 0 0
0 7 0 3 30 010 5 0 0 0 0
269 1,541 0
HV 0 1 4 0 0
Count Total 0 297 320 0 0 0 480 493 0 491 2,563 0
348 1,4870 0 0 47 0 710 0 81 43 0 0
45 0 94 328 1,537
8:45 AM 0 59 47 0
39 0 0 0 0 0
389 1,541
8:30 AM 0 42 47 0 0 0 61
0 0 0 69 0 990 0 71 55 0 0
103 0 90 422 1,352
8:15 AM 0 45 50 0
78 0 0 0 0 0
398 1,076
8:00 AM 0 35 46 0 0 0 70
0 0 0 91 0 390 0 87 97 0 0
63 0 41 332 0
7:45 AM 0 40 44 0
88 0 0 0 0 0
200 0
7:30 AM 0 28 49 0 0 0 63
0 0 0 36 0 340 0 30 51 0 0
39 0 23 146 0
7:15 AM 0 22 27 0
31 0 0 0 0 07:00 AM 0 26 10 0 0 0 17

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-11-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 1.7% 0.77
TOTAL 1.9% 0.91
TH RT
WB 2.5% 0.83
NB - -
Peak Hour: 7:30 AM 8:30 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.5% 0.89
0 2
2 1
0 0
0 0
0 2
1 0
7 9
0 4
N
Clay Bank Rd
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveClay Bank Rd
E Tabor Ave
Clay Bank Rd
1,541TEV:

0.91PHF: 269
0 326
595
466
0 318
291
0 609
515
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
189
148
337
560
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 169
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
022 0 1 2
063 0 1 2
0000
0 0
0 01
1 THLT
00000000
0 00
1 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 THLT
80 0 0 10 0
14 020 0 0
0 1
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 8200 01 1 0 0
3 9
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
8 8:30 AM
30 0 0 10 0
0 6
8:15 AM
0 0 0
1 1 0
0 2 0
0 0 0
6 8:00 AM
300 0
2 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
10 0 0 00 07:15 AM 0
0 1
0 1 1
0 07:00 AM
RT
30 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 7 0 30 0 10 5 0 0

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
10 0 10 59 0
Peak Hour 0 1 4 0
8 0 0 0 0 0Count Total 0 4 11 0 0 0 16
12 380 0 0 0 0 50 0 4 0 0 0
1 0 0 10 34
8:45 AM 0 1 2 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
11 30
8:30 AM 0 2 4 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 1 0 20 0 4 2 0 0
1 0 1 5 24
8:15 AM 0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
8 21
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 3 0 00 0 1 2 0 0
2 0 0 6 0
7:45 AM 0 1 1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
5 0
7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 2 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0
7:15 AM 0 0 1 0
2 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 170
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
4 3
2 2
1 1
2 2
17 6
50 1 8 1 0 0
4 9
Peak Hour 4 5 0 2 11 2 5
6 0 1 16 3 1Count Total 11 10 0 6 27 9
0 0 20 1 0 0 1 05:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2
0 3 1 0 0 1
1 5:30 PM 1 0 0 2 3 1 2 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1
5:15 PM 1 3 0 0 4 0 0
2 0 0 3 0 0
0 0 1
5:00 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1
3 0 0 0 3 1
0 0 2
0 4:30 PM 1 2 0 1 4 0 0 0
0 0 3 0 1 2
1 4 2
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 2 1 0 1 4
0 0 0
- - -HV% - 1% 1% - -
2 1
4:15 PM 2 1 0 1 4 2 1
0 0 0 2 1 0
West North South
4:00 PM 2 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 227 00 0 0 178 192 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
- - 1% - 0% 1%- 2% 1%
Peak
Hour
All 0 201 202
368 0 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0 11 03 2 0 0 0 0
172 1,172 0
HV 0 2 2 0 0
Count Total 0 370 397 0 0 0 349 451 0 325 2,260 0
297 1,1720 0 0 57 0 410 0 45 54 0 0
53 0 46 313 1,149
5:45 PM 0 50 50 0
60 0 0 0 0 0
283 1,109
5:30 PM 0 59 56 0 0 0 39
0 0 0 55 0 450 0 50 39 0 0
62 0 40 279 1,083
5:15 PM 0 40 54 0
39 0 0 0 0 0
274 1,088
5:00 PM 0 52 42 0 0 0 44
0 0 0 51 0 380 0 43 50 0 0
66 0 34 273 0
4:45 PM 0 37 55 0
49 0 0 0 0 0
257 0
4:30 PM 0 42 45 0 0 0 37
0 0 0 54 0 400 0 39 33 0 0
53 0 41 284 0
4:15 PM 0 42 49 0
44 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 48 46 0 0 0 52

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-11-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 0.5% 0.98
TOTAL 0.9% 0.94
TH RT
WB 1.4% 0.93
NB - -
Peak Hour: 5:00 PM 6:00 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.0% 0.88
0 2
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
5 0
0 5
0 1
N
Clay Bank Rd
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveClay Bank Rd
E Tabor Ave
Clay Bank Rd
1,172TEV:

0.94PHF: 172
0 227
399
393
0 192
178
0 370
429
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
202
201
403
350
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 171
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 0
0 1 0
020 0 5 0
090 0 6 0
0020
0 0
0 02
0 THLT
00000000
3 10
0 0
0 2 0
0 1 0
0 THLT
80 1 0 00 0
16 000 0 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
1 0Count Total
0 8100 00 0 0 0
3 10
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
7 5:30 PM
10 1 0 00 0
3 9
5:15 PM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
8 5:00 PM
300 0
0 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
30 0 0 00 04:15 PM 0
0 0
0 0 0
2 04:00 PM
RT
11 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 2 0 00 0 3 2 0 0

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
6 0 0 27 0
Peak Hour 0 2 2 0
3 0 0 0 0 0Count Total 0 4 7 0 0 0 7
2 110 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
2 0 0 3 13
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 14
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 1 0 0
0 0 0 2 14
5:15 PM 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
4 16
5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 0
4:45 PM 0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0
4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 1 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 0
4:15 PM 0 1 1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 172
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
1 0
6 4
6 4
2 2
25 20
50 0 1 4 0 11
12 9
Peak Hour 7 10 0 8 25 0 1
3 0 1 7 4 0Count Total 16 19 0 13 48 3
0 0 20 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 4 0 1 5
1 2 0 0 0 2
1 8:30 AM 5 1 0 2 8 1 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 2
2 2
8:15 AM 3 3 0 3 9 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 0
0 2 1
8:00 AM 1 6 0 2 9 0
0 0 0 0 0 1
0 5 1
0 7:30 AM 1 0 0 2 3 0 1 0
0 0 2 0 0 0
2 6 1
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 2 1 0 1 4
0 1 0
- - -HV% - 3% 2% - -
1 0
7:15 AM 1 3 0 0 4 1 1
1 0 0 2 0 0
West North South
7:00 AM 3 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 288 00 0 0 234 300 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
- - 2% - 1% 2%- 3% 1%
Peak
Hour
All 0 153 165
448 0 0 0 0 0
0 6 0 2 25 08 2 0 0 0 0
194 1,334 0
HV 0 4 3 0 0
Count Total 0 304 313 0 0 0 406 441 0 352 2,264 0
317 1,2920 0 0 51 0 640 0 69 32 0 0
40 0 55 282 1,313
8:45 AM 0 48 53 0
38 0 0 0 0 0
318 1,334
8:30 AM 0 51 48 0 0 0 50
0 0 0 61 0 600 0 69 52 0 0
92 0 52 375 1,210
8:15 AM 0 44 32 0
82 0 0 0 0 0
338 972
8:00 AM 0 29 49 0 0 0 71
0 0 0 78 0 410 0 46 84 0 0
57 0 41 303 0
7:45 AM 0 46 43 0
82 0 0 0 0 0
194 0
7:30 AM 0 34 41 0 0 0 48
0 0 0 35 0 220 0 36 44 0 0
27 0 17 137 0
7:15 AM 0 25 32 0
34 0 0 0 0 07:00 AM 0 27 15 0 0 0 17

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-12-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB 1.7% 0.84
TOTAL 1.9% 0.89
TH RT
WB 1.9% 0.87
NB - -
Peak Hour: 7:30 AM 8:30 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 2.2% 0.89
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
11 5
0 4
N
Clay Bank Rd
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveClay Bank Rd
E Tabor Ave
Clay Bank Rd
1,334TEV:

0.89PHF: 194
0 288
482
453
0 300
234
0 534
453
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
165
153
318
428
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 173
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
000 0 1 0
030 0 1 2
0010
0 0
0 01
0 THLT
00000010
0 00
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 1
0 THLT
10 0 0 00 0
7 010 0 0
0 1
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 2000 00 0 0 0
2 2
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
1 8:30 AM
00 0 0 00 0
0 3
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
5 8:00 AM
000 0
1 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
20 0 0 00 07:15 AM 0
1 0
0 0 0
2 07:00 AM
RT
25 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 6 0 20 0 8 2 0 0

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
9 0 4 48 0
Peak Hour 0 4 3 0
5 0 0 0 0 0Count Total 0 6 10 0 0 0 14
5 310 0 0 1 0 00 0 4 0 0 0
1 0 1 8 30
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
9 25
8:30 AM 0 1 4 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 2 0 10 0 3 0 0 0
1 0 1 9 20
8:15 AM 0 2 1 0
2 0 0 0 0 0
4 17
8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 4
0 0 0 1 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
2 0 0 3 0
7:45 AM 0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0
7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 2 0 0
1 0 1 6 0
7:15 AM 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 174
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
3 2
1 13
8 0
2 1
30 22
100 2 7 7 1 4
4 17
Peak Hour 5 9 0 4 18 3 2
4 0 3 11 8 1Count Total 17 13 0 5 35 4
0 0 10 1 0 0 1 05:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2
1 2 0 0 0 2
0 5:30 PM 3 0 0 1 4 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
3 2
5:15 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 0
2 0 2 4 2 1
0 1 7
5:00 PM 1 2 0 2 5 0
2 0 0 0 2 5
0 0 1
2 4:30 PM 0 4 0 2 6 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 6 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 3 2 0 0 5
0 0 0
- - -HV% - 2% 0% - -
0 2
4:15 PM 3 2 0 0 5 0 1
0 0 0 0 1 0
West North South
4:00 PM 5 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 244 00 0 0 207 186 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
- - 0% - 2% 1%- 2% 2%
Peak
Hour
All 0 200 249
368 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 3 18 05 4 0 0 0 0
178 1,264 0
HV 0 4 1 0 0
Count Total 0 391 451 0 0 0 377 466 0 347 2,400 0
279 1,1960 0 0 54 0 390 0 37 57 0 0
56 0 41 275 1,209
5:45 PM 0 39 53 0
37 0 0 0 0 0
322 1,264
5:30 PM 0 50 52 0 0 0 39
0 0 0 67 0 400 0 48 48 0 0
61 0 53 320 1,208
5:15 PM 0 51 68 0
45 0 0 0 0 0
292 1,204
5:00 PM 0 56 57 0 0 0 48
0 0 0 60 0 370 0 56 37 0 0
56 0 48 330 0
4:45 PM 0 52 50 0
56 0 0 0 0 0
266 0
4:30 PM 0 41 74 0 0 0 55
0 0 0 48 0 410 0 46 35 0 0
64 0 48 316 0
4:15 PM 0 54 42 0
53 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 48 55 0 0 0 48

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-12-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB 0.9% 0.93
TOTAL 1.4% 0.96
TH RT
WB 2.3% 0.89
NB - -
Peak Hour: 4:30 PM 5:30 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.1% 0.94
0 2
1 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 0
4 10
1 7
N
Clay Bank Rd
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveClay Bank Rd
E Tabor Ave
Clay Bank Rd
1,264TEV:

0.96PHF: 178
0 244
422
386
0 186
207
0 393
493
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
249
200
449
385
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 175
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 0 0
0 1 0
021 0 2 0
022 0 3 1
0000
0 0
0 00
0 THLT
00000000
2 00
0 0
0 2 0
0 0 1
0 THLT
70 1 0 10 0
11 010 0 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
2 0Count Total
0 8100 00 0 0 0
2 9
5:45 PM
0 0 0 1
7 5:30 PM
10 0 0 00 0
4 7
5:15 PM
0 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0
3 5:00 PM
200 0
0 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
10 0 0 00 04:15 PM 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 04:00 PM
RT
18 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 1 0 30 0 5 4 0 0

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
2 0 3 35 0
Peak Hour 0 4 1 0
5 0 0 0 0 0Count Total 0 8 9 0 0 0 8
2 130 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 0 4 16
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
2 18
5:30 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 2 5 21
5:15 PM 0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0
5 22
5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 1 0 0
1 0 1 6 0
4:45 PM 0 3 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
5 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 6 0
4:15 PM 0 2 1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 2 3 0 0 0 0

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Clay Bank Rd Clay Bank Rd
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 176
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
0 2
4 2
2 1
4 0
15 9
22 0 7 0 0 7
13 2
Peak Hour 11 17 2 0 30 4 1
1 3 0 10 0 0Count Total 20 25 6 0 51 6
0 0 01 0 0 0 1 08:45 AM 1 3 2 0 6
0 1 0 0 4 0
1 8:30 AM 5 3 1 0 9 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
2 0
8:15 AM 3 7 0 0 10 1 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 2 0
8:00 AM 1 3 0 0 4 1
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 3 1
0 7:30 AM 3 3 1 0 7 2 1 1
1 0 1 0 0 2
0 2 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 4 4 1 0 9
0 4 0
- 1% -HV% - - 3% 2% 0%
0 0
7:15 AM 3 0 1 0 4 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
West North South
7:00 AM 0 2 0
4 116 0 206 0 0 0191 1 285 486 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
0% - - - - 2%1% 3% -
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 319
0 0 213 0 357 0
0 0 0 0 30 013 0 0 1 0 1
0 1,604 0
HV 0 0 8 3 0
Count Total 0 0 484 322 1 501 747 0 0 0 2,625 0
297 1,3980 28 0 0 0 00 54 94 0 0 28
0 0 0 323 1,564
8:45 AM 0 0 46 47
0 0 37 0 49 0
360 1,604
8:30 AM 0 0 53 39 0 80 65
0 34 0 0 0 00 88 97 0 0 22
0 0 0 418 1,480
8:15 AM 0 0 49 70
0 0 25 0 47 0
463 1,227
8:00 AM 0 0 88 59 1 76 122
0 71 0 0 0 00 74 151 0 0 33
0 0 0 363 0
7:45 AM 0 0 105 29
0 0 36 0 54 0
236 0
7:30 AM 0 0 77 33 0 47 116
0 37 0 0 0 00 48 64 0 0 22
0 0 0 165 0
7:15 AM 0 0 38 27
0 0 10 0 37 07:00 AM 0 0 28 18 0 34 38

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-11-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB - -
TOTAL 1.9% 0.87
TH RT
WB 2.2% 0.86
NB 0.6% 0.77
Peak Hour: 7:30 AM 8:30 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 2.2% 0.87
0 4
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
7 2
0 0
N
Railroad Ave
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveRailroad Ave
E Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
1,604TEV:

0.87PHF: 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
486
285
772
526
1 206
0 116
322
476
0 191
319
0 510
602
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 177
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
040 0 1 0
150 0 1 0
0000
0 0
0 00
2 THLT
00000000
0 10
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 THLT
71 0 0 01 0
10 001 0 2
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 4100 00 0 1 0
1 4
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
7 8:30 AM
10 0 0 00 0
1 7
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
6 8:00 AM
101 0
4 0
7:45 AM
0 0 1 0
0 7:30 AM
11 0 0 00 07:15 AM 0
1 0
0 0 0
0 07:00 AM
RT
30 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 1 0 0 0 00 4 13 0 0 1

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
0 0 0 51 0
Peak Hour 0 0 8 3
0 0 4 0 2 0Count Total 0 0 12 8 0 5 20
6 290 1 0 0 0 00 0 3 0 0 1
0 0 0 9 32
8:45 AM 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 0
10 30
8:30 AM 0 0 3 2 0 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 00 1 6 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 24
8:15 AM 0 0 3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
9 22
8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 00 2 2 0 0 1
0 0 0 7 0
7:45 AM 0 0 3 1
0 0 0 0 1 0
4 0
7:30 AM 0 0 2 1 0 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 2 0
7:15 AM 0 0 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 178
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
0 2
1 0
0 1
0 2
6 1
00 0 11 0 0 1
3 3
Peak Hour 6 7 0 0 13 7 4
7 1 0 21 0 0Count Total 13 12 1 0 26 13
0 0 20 1 0 0 1 05:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2
0 4 0 0 0 0
0 5:30 PM 2 1 0 0 3 2 2 0
0 0 1 0 0 1
0 0
5:15 PM 1 2 0 0 3 1 0
2 0 0 3 0 0
0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 2 0 0 2 1
3 0 0 0 3 0
0 0 1
0 4:30 PM 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0
1 0 3 0 0 2
0 3 5
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 3 2 0 0 5
0 0 0
- 0% -HV% - - 1% 1% -
0 0
4:15 PM 2 1 1 0 4 1 1
1 0 0 6 0 0
West North South
4:00 PM 2 1 0
2 116 0 211 0 0 0152 0 189 245 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
0% - - - - 1%1% 2% -
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 277
0 0 224 0 391 0
0 0 0 0 13 05 0 0 0 0 0
0 1,190 0
HV 0 0 4 2 0
Count Total 0 0 551 297 0 348 497 0 0 0 2,308 0
282 1,1690 35 0 0 0 00 40 63 0 0 38
0 0 0 286 1,190
5:45 PM 0 0 69 37
0 0 36 0 50 0
313 1,183
5:30 PM 0 0 77 31 0 32 60
0 57 0 0 0 00 51 64 0 0 28
0 0 0 288 1,140
5:15 PM 0 0 69 44
0 0 27 0 51 0
303 1,139
5:00 PM 0 0 61 42 0 54 53
0 53 0 0 0 00 52 68 0 0 25
0 0 0 279 0
4:45 PM 0 0 70 35
0 0 25 0 51 0
270 0
4:30 PM 0 0 69 40 0 32 62
0 52 0 0 0 00 41 56 0 0 17
0 0 0 287 0
4:15 PM 0 0 67 37
0 0 28 0 42 04:00 PM 0 0 69 31 0 46 71

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-11-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB - -
TOTAL 1.1% 0.95
TH RT
WB 1.6% 0.90
NB 0.0% 0.95
Peak Hour: 4:45 PM 5:45 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.4% 0.95
0 7
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
1 0
0 0
N
Railroad Ave
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveRailroad Ave
E Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
1,190TEV:

0.95PHF: 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
245
189
434
488
0 211
0 116
327
341
0 152
277
0 429
361
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 179
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 0
0 1 0
070 0 4 0
1120 2 5 0
1140
0 0
0 01
0 THLT
00000000
3 10
0 0
0 2 0
1 0 0
0 THLT
110 0 0 00 0
21 000 0 1
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 9100 00 0 0 0
4 11
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
7 5:30 PM
10 0 0 00 0
3 9
5:15 PM
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 2 0
0 0 0
12 5:00 PM
300 0
0 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
31 0 0 00 04:15 PM 0
0 0
0 0 0
6 04:00 PM
RT
13 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 0 0 00 2 5 0 0 0

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
0 0 0 26 0
Peak Hour 0 0 4 2
0 0 0 0 1 0Count Total 0 0 11 2 0 2 10
2 100 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 13
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 14
5:30 PM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 15
5:15 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
5 16
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 0
4:45 PM 0 0 2 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0
4:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
0 1 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0
4:15 PM 0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 180
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
0 3
9 0
2 1
0 0
15 12
01 0 3 1 0 11
14 0
Peak Hour 9 12 3 0 24 0 2
3 1 0 6 1 0Count Total 19 21 5 0 45 2
0 0 00 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 2 4 0 0 6
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 8:30 AM 4 1 1 0 6 1 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 1
2 0
8:15 AM 4 3 0 0 7 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
8:00 AM 1 5 1 0 7 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 8 0
0 7:30 AM 3 1 0 0 4 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 3
0 5 1
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 1 3 2 0 6
0 2 1
- 1% -HV% - - 3% 1% -
0 0
7:15 AM 1 2 1 0 4 0 0
1 0 0 2 0 0
West North South
7:00 AM 3 2 0
3 114 0 192 0 0 0155 0 208 416 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
1% - - - - 2%1% 2% -
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 299
0 0 187 0 315 0
0 0 0 0 24 09 0 0 1 0 2
0 1,384 0
HV 0 0 8 1 0
Count Total 0 0 498 252 0 329 664 0 0 0 2,245 0
270 1,1980 31 0 0 0 00 32 83 0 0 19
0 0 0 232 1,296
8:45 AM 0 0 58 47
0 0 24 0 31 0
321 1,384
8:30 AM 0 0 61 25 0 29 62
0 37 0 0 0 00 57 93 0 0 28
0 0 0 375 1,272
8:15 AM 0 0 44 62
0 0 22 0 40 0
368 1,047
8:00 AM 0 0 88 42 0 53 130
0 64 0 0 0 00 50 104 0 0 29
0 0 0 320 0
7:45 AM 0 0 87 34
0 0 35 0 51 0
209 0
7:30 AM 0 0 80 17 0 48 89
0 32 0 0 0 00 34 63 0 0 16
0 0 0 150 0
7:15 AM 0 0 48 16
0 0 14 0 29 07:00 AM 0 0 32 9 0 26 40

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-12-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB - -
TOTAL 1.7% 0.92
TH RT
WB 1.9% 0.85
NB 1.0% 0.82
Peak Hour: 7:30 AM 8:30 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 2.0% 0.87
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
2 0
11 0
0 1
N
Railroad Ave
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveRailroad Ave
E Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
1,384TEV:

0.92PHF: 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
416
208
624
491
0 192
0 114
306
363
0 155
299
0 454
530
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 181
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
000 0 2 0
020 0 3 0
0010
0 0
0 00
0 THLT
00000001
0 00
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 THLT
31 0 0 00 0
6 000 0 1
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 2000 00 0 0 0
1 2
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
3 8:30 AM
11 0 0 00 0
0 2
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
4 8:00 AM
000 0
2 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
00 0 0 00 07:15 AM 0
2 0
0 0 0
2 07:00 AM
RT
24 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 2 0 0 0 00 3 9 0 0 1

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
0 0 0 45 0
Peak Hour 0 0 8 1
0 0 3 0 2 0Count Total 0 0 16 3 0 5 16
6 260 0 0 0 0 00 1 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 6 26
8:45 AM 0 0 1 1
0 0 1 0 0 0
7 24
8:30 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 7 21
8:15 AM 0 0 4 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
6 19
8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 5
0 2 0 0 0 00 2 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 0
7:45 AM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0
7:30 AM 0 0 2 1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 00 1 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 5 0
7:15 AM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 2

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 182
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
0 1
1 1
2 0
0 1
6 4
20 0 5 0 0 2
3 3
Peak Hour 3 8 2 0 13 3 2
4 1 0 9 0 0Count Total 11 12 3 0 26 4
0 0 10 1 0 0 1 05:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2
0 2 0 0 0 0
0 5:30 PM 4 0 1 0 5 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1
5:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0
2 0 0 3 0 0
0 1 0
5:00 PM 1 2 0 0 3 1
2 0 0 0 2 0
0 0 1
0 4:30 PM 2 3 1 0 6 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 1
0 4 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 0 1 1 0 2
0 0 0
- 1% -HV% - - 1% 0% -
0 0
4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
West North South
4:00 PM 3 1 0
1 92 0 230 0 0 0158 0 152 304 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
0% - - - - 1%1% 2% -
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 355
0 0 182 0 439 0
0 0 0 0 13 07 0 0 1 0 1
0 1,291 0
HV 0 0 3 0 0
Count Total 1 0 616 300 0 322 561 0 0 0 2,421 0
313 1,2270 59 0 0 0 00 54 72 0 0 22
0 0 0 279 1,211
5:45 PM 0 0 66 40
0 0 21 0 59 0
339 1,291
5:30 PM 0 0 75 35 0 34 55
0 57 0 0 0 00 50 78 0 0 20
0 0 0 296 1,181
5:15 PM 0 0 90 44
0 0 24 0 58 0
297 1,194
5:00 PM 0 0 80 39 0 27 68
0 52 0 0 0 00 41 72 0 0 21
0 0 0 359 0
4:45 PM 0 0 82 29
0 0 27 0 63 0
229 0
4:30 PM 0 0 103 46 0 34 86
0 43 0 0 0 00 40 58 0 0 18
0 0 0 309 0
4:15 PM 1 0 46 23
0 0 29 0 48 04:00 PM 0 0 74 44 0 42 72

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-12-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB - -
TOTAL 1.0% 0.90
TH RT
WB 1.8% 0.89
NB 0.6% 0.89
Peak Hour: 4:30 PM 5:30 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.6% 0.86
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
2 2
0 0
N
Railroad Ave
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveRailroad Ave
E Tabor Ave
Railroad Ave
1,291TEV:

0.9PHF: 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
304
152
456
585
0 230
0 92
322
310
0 158
355
0 513
396
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 183
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
030 0 2 0
040 0 4 0
0000
0 0
0 00
0 THLT
00000000
2 10
0 0
0 2 0
0 1 0
0 THLT
50 0 0 00 0
9 000 0 1
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 6100 00 0 0 0
2 7
5:45 PM
0 0 1 0
5 5:30 PM
00 0 0 00 0
3 6
5:15 PM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
3 5:00 PM
200 0
0 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
10 0 0 00 04:15 PM 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 04:00 PM
RT
13 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 1 0 0 0 00 1 7 0 0 1

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
0 0 0 26 0
Peak Hour 0 0 3 0
0 0 1 0 2 0Count Total 0 0 10 1 0 1 11
2 120 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 5 12
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
2 13
5:30 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 00 1 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 13
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
2 14
5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 6 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
2 0
4:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 2 1 0 0 1

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Railroad Ave Railroad Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 184
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
4 0
5 3
3 5
3 0
23 16
10 0 9 0 0 15
17 2
Peak Hour 9 16 2 0 27 8 1
1 0 0 11 2 2Count Total 14 24 2 0 40 10
0 0 00 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 1 3 0 0 4
0 1 0 0 2 1
1 8:30 AM 3 3 0 0 6 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 4
3 0
8:15 AM 3 6 1 0 10 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 3 0
8:00 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0
2 0 0 0 2 0
0 5 0
0 7:30 AM 3 3 1 0 7 5 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 2 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 3 4 0 0 7
0 6 0
- 4% -HV% 0% - 2% 0% -
0 0
7:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
0 0 0 0 2 2
West North South
7:00 AM 0 2 0
0 27 0 16 0 0 019 0 9 753 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
6% - - - - 2%0% 2% -
Peak
Hour
All 1 0 508
0 0 50 0 21 0
0 0 0 0 27 016 0 0 1 0 1
0 1,333 0
HV 0 0 9 0 0
Count Total 1 0 810 36 0 16 1,206 0 0 0 2,140 0
228 1,0920 1 0 0 0 00 3 141 0 0 8
0 0 0 248 1,278
8:45 AM 0 0 67 8
0 0 5 0 1 0
272 1,333
8:30 AM 0 0 98 4 0 2 138
0 5 0 0 0 00 0 177 0 0 4
0 0 0 344 1,254
8:15 AM 1 0 80 5
0 0 6 0 4 0
414 1,048
8:00 AM 0 0 127 7 0 5 195
0 4 0 0 0 00 1 218 0 0 11
0 0 0 303 0
7:45 AM 0 0 177 3
0 0 6 0 3 0
193 0
7:30 AM 0 0 124 4 0 3 163
0 3 0 0 0 00 2 106 0 0 6
0 0 0 138 0
7:15 AM 0 0 72 4
0 0 4 0 0 07:00 AM 0 0 65 1 0 0 68

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-11-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB - -
TOTAL 2.0% 0.80
TH RT
WB 2.1% 0.87
NB 4.7% 0.72
Peak Hour: 7:30 AM 8:30 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 1.7% 0.73
0 8
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
15 1
0 0
N
Olive Ave
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveOlive Ave
E Tabor Ave
Olive Ave
1,333TEV:

0.8PHF: 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
753
9 762
524
0 16
0 27
43 28
0 19
508
0 528
781
1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 185
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
080 0 1 0
0100 0 1 0
0000
0 0
0 01
5 THLT
00000000
2 00
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 THLT
90 0 0 00 0
11 000 0 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 2000 00 0 0 0
1 4
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
9 8:30 AM
10 0 0 00 0
0 9
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
9 8:00 AM
200 0
6 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
10 0 0 00 07:15 AM 0
1 0
0 0 0
0 07:00 AM
RT
27 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 1 0 0 0 00 0 16 0 0 1

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
0 0 0 40 0
Peak Hour 0 0 9 0
0 0 1 0 1 0Count Total 0 0 14 0 0 0 24
4 230 0 0 0 0 00 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 6 26
8:45 AM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
10 27
8:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 6 0 0 1
0 0 0 3 18
8:15 AM 0 0 3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
7 17
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 4 0 0 0
0 0 0 7 0
7:45 AM 0 0 3 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
1 0
7:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0
7:15 AM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 186
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
3 4
1 0
0 1
1 2
12 2
10 0 10 0 0 1
9 3
Peak Hour 4 7 0 0 11 6 4
7 2 0 21 0 0Count Total 12 12 0 0 24 12
0 0 20 1 0 0 1 05:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2
0 3 0 0 0 1
0 5:30 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 0
0 0 1 0 0 1
0 0
5:15 PM 1 2 0 0 3 1 0
2 0 0 3 0 0
0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 2 0 0 2 1
3 0 0 0 3 0
0 1 0
0 4:30 PM 2 2 0 0 4 1 0 0
0 0 4 0 0 4
0 3 2
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 2 2 0 0 4
0 1 0
- 0% -HV% - - 1% 0% -
3 0
4:15 PM 3 1 0 0 4 3 1
1 2 0 5 0 0
West North South
4:00 PM 2 1 0
0 27 0 13 0 0 032 0 10 402 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
0% - - - - 1%0% 2% -
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 457
0 0 60 0 20 0
0 0 0 0 11 07 0 0 0 0 0
0 941 0
HV 0 0 4 0 0
Count Total 0 0 877 66 0 22 779 0 0 0 1,824 0
212 9060 2 0 0 0 00 2 93 0 0 13
0 0 0 223 941
5:45 PM 0 0 93 9
0 0 4 0 3 0
243 934
5:30 PM 0 0 120 9 0 1 86
0 2 0 0 0 00 3 104 0 0 8
0 0 0 228 908
5:15 PM 0 0 119 7
0 0 10 0 5 0
247 918
5:00 PM 0 0 103 10 0 3 97
0 3 0 0 0 00 3 115 0 0 5
0 0 0 216 0
4:45 PM 0 0 115 6
0 0 5 0 1 0
217 0
4:30 PM 0 0 115 6 0 1 88
0 1 0 0 0 00 4 87 0 0 7
0 0 0 238 0
4:15 PM 0 0 109 9
0 0 8 0 3 04:00 PM 0 0 103 10 0 5 109

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-11-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB - -
TOTAL 1.2% 0.95
TH RT
WB 1.7% 0.87
NB 0.0% 0.67
Peak Hour: 4:45 PM 5:45 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.8% 0.95
1 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
1 1
0 0
N
Olive Ave
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveOlive Ave
E Tabor Ave
Olive Ave
941TEV:

0.95PHF: 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
402
10 412
470
0 13
0 27
40 42
0 32
457
0 489
429
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 187
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 0
0 1 0
150 0 4 0
2100 0 7 0
0110
1 0
0 03
1 THLT
00020001
3 00
0 0
0 2 0
0 1 0
0 THLT
100 0 0 00 0
21 000 0 2
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 8100 00 0 0 0
3 10
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
8 5:30 PM
10 0 0 00 0
3 11
5:15 PM
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
13 5:00 PM
300 0
1 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
40 0 0 00 04:15 PM 0
0 0
0 0 0
5 04:00 PM
RT
11 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 7 0 0 0

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
0 0 0 24 0
Peak Hour 0 0 4 0
0 0 0 0 0 0Count Total 0 0 11 1 0 0 12
2 90 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 11
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 13
5:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 14
5:15 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 15
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 0
4:45 PM 0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0
4:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0
4:15 PM 0 0 2 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 188
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
4 1
7 2
2 1
0 0
17 12
00 0 2 0 0 12
16 0
Peak Hour 10 12 1 0 23 1 1
3 0 0 6 0 1Count Total 18 21 1 0 40 3
0 0 00 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 1 4 0 0 5
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 8:30 AM 4 1 0 0 5 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 1
2 0
8:15 AM 4 3 0 0 7 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 2 0
8:00 AM 1 4 0 0 5 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 7 0
0 7:30 AM 2 1 0 0 3 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 1
0 4 1
EB WB NB SB Total East
7:45 AM 3 4 1 0 8
0 1 0
- 0% -HV% - - 2% 0% -
3 0
7:15 AM 1 2 0 0 3 0 1
1 0 0 2 0 1
West North South
7:00 AM 2 2 0
0 26 0 15 0 0 013 0 10 591 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
7% - - - - 2%0% 2% -
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 474
0 0 44 0 20 0
0 0 0 0 23 012 0 0 0 0 1
0 1,129 0
HV 0 0 10 0 0
Count Total 0 0 785 25 0 13 946 0 0 0 1,833 0
208 9400 2 0 0 0 00 0 111 0 0 7
0 0 0 185 1,036
8:45 AM 0 0 85 3
0 0 6 0 1 0
227 1,129
8:30 AM 0 0 88 5 0 2 83
0 1 0 0 0 00 2 139 0 0 3
0 0 0 320 1,086
8:15 AM 0 0 79 3
0 0 7 0 2 0
304 893
8:00 AM 0 0 129 1 0 3 178
0 5 0 0 0 00 2 142 0 0 7
0 0 0 278 0
7:45 AM 0 0 142 6
0 0 9 0 7 0
184 0
7:30 AM 0 0 124 3 0 3 132
0 2 0 0 0 00 0 100 0 0 2
0 0 0 127 0
7:15 AM 0 0 78 2
0 0 3 0 0 07:00 AM 0 0 60 2 0 1 61

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-12-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM
SB - -
TOTAL 2.0% 0.88
TH RT
WB 2.0% 0.83
NB 2.4% 0.64
Peak Hour: 7:30 AM 8:30 AM
HV %: PHF
EB 2.1% 0.82
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
12 0
0 0
N
Olive Ave
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveOlive Ave
E Tabor Ave
Olive Ave
1,129TEV:

0.88PHF: 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
591
10 601
489
0 15
0 26
41 23
0 13
474
0 487
617
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 189
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
010 0 1 0
030 0 3 0
0010
0 0
0 00
0 THLT
00000001
0 00
0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 THLT
20 0 0 00 0
6 000 0 0
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 2000 00 0 0 0
1 2
8:45 AM
0 0 0 0
2 8:30 AM
10 0 0 00 0
0 2
8:15 AM
0 0 0
0 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
4 8:00 AM
000 0
1 0
7:45 AM
0 0 0 0
0 7:30 AM
10 0 0 00 07:15 AM 0
1 0
0 0 0
2 07:00 AM
RT
23 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 1 0 0 0 00 0 12 0 0 0

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
0 0 0 40 0
Peak Hour 0 0 10 0
0 0 0 0 1 0Count Total 0 0 18 0 0 0 21
5 220 0 0 0 0 00 0 4 0 0 0
0 0 0 5 25
8:45 AM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
7 23
8:30 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 3 0 0 0
0 0 0 5 19
8:15 AM 0 0 4 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
8 18
8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 4
0 1 0 0 0 00 0 4 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0
7:45 AM 0 0 3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0
7:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 0
7:15 AM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 2

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 190
www.idaxdata.com
to
to
Two-Hour Count Summaries
Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count.

Total
0 1
3 2
2 0
1 1
10 7
60 0 5 0 0 1
2 8
Peak Hour 4 8 2 0 14 3 2
5 1 0 11 0 0Count Total 12 12 2 0 26 5
0 0 10 1 0 0 1 05:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2
0 2 0 0 0 1
0 5:30 PM 5 0 0 0 5 2 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1
5:15 PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
2 0 0 3 0 0
0 0 2
5:00 PM 1 2 0 0 3 1
2 0 0 0 2 0
0 0 3
0 4:30 PM 3 4 0 0 7 0 0 0
1 0 3 0 0 1
0 3 0
EB WB NB SB Total East
4:45 PM 0 1 1 0 2
0 0 0
- 5% -HV% - - 1% 0% -
0 0
4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0
West North South
4:00 PM 2 1 0
1 20 0 10 0 0 038 0 10 417 0 0
0 Interval
Start
Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total
10% - - - - 1%10% 2% -
Peak
Hour
All 0 0 543
0 0 49 0 19 0
0 0 0 0 14 07 0 0 1 0 1
0 1,038 0
HV 0 0 4 0 0
Count Total 1 0 987 66 0 20 834 0 0 0 1,976 0
254 1,0010 3 0 0 0 00 2 114 0 0 10
0 0 0 233 998
5:45 PM 1 0 114 10
0 0 2 0 3 0
280 1,038
5:30 PM 0 0 125 11 0 2 90
0 6 0 0 0 00 1 121 0 0 6
0 0 0 234 965
5:15 PM 0 0 140 6
0 0 5 0 2 0
251 975
5:00 PM 0 0 121 14 0 3 89
0 2 0 0 0 00 3 109 0 0 4
0 0 0 273 0
4:45 PM 0 0 121 12
0 0 5 0 0 0
207 0
4:30 PM 0 0 161 6 0 3 98
0 2 0 0 0 00 1 108 0 0 6
0 0 0 244 0
4:15 PM 0 0 89 1
0 0 11 0 1 04:00 PM 0 0 116 6 0 5 105

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total

UT LT TH RT
Date: 03-12-2020
Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM
SB - -
TOTAL 1.3% 0.93
TH RT
WB 1.9% 0.88
NB 6.7% 0.63
Peak Hour: 4:30 PM 5:30 PM
HV %: PHF
EB 0.7% 0.87
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
1 6
0 0
N
Olive Ave
E Tabor Ave
E Tabor AveOlive Ave
E Tabor Ave
Olive Ave
1,038TEV:

0.93PHF: 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
417
10 427
553
0 10
0 20
30 48
0 38
543
0 581
437
0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 191
www.idaxdata.com
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles
Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes
Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
120 0 2 0
140 1 4 0
0000
0 1
0 00
0 THLT
00000000
1 10
0 0
0 2 0
1 1 0
0 THLT
50 0 0 00 0
11 000 0 1
0 0
0 0
Peak Hour
0 0Count Total
0 6100 00 0 0 0
2 7
5:45 PM
0 0 0 0
5 5:30 PM
00 0 0 00 0
3 8
5:15 PM
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 0
0 0 0
5 5:00 PM
200 0
0 0
4:45 PM
0 0 0 0
0 4:30 PM
31 0 0 00 04:15 PM 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 04:00 PM
RT
14 0
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One Hour
0 1 0 0 0 00 1 7 0 0 1

RTTHLT RTTHLTRT
0 0 0 26 0
Peak Hour 0 0 4 0
0 0 1 0 1 0Count Total 0 0 11 1 0 1 11
2 120 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 5 12
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
2 14
5:30 PM 0 0 4 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 3 14
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
2 14
5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
0 1 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 7 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0
4:30 PM 0 0 3 0 0 1 3
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TH RT
4:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1

UT LT TH RT UT LT
Northbound Southbound

UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT
Interval
Start
E Tabor Ave E Tabor Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave
15-min
Total
Rolling
One HourEastbound Westbound
SouthboundNorthboundWestboundEastbound
Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 [email protected] 192
Auto School
Bus
Passenger
Bus
Truck/
Semi/
Hazmat
Total
Queue Auto School
Bus
Passenger
Bus
Truck/
Semi/
Hazmat
Total
Queue Auto School
Bus
Passenger
Bus
Truck/
Semi/
Hazmat
Total
Queue Auto School
Bus
Passenger
Bus
Truck/
Semi/
Hazmat
Total
Queue Auto School
Bus
Passenger
Bus
Truck/
Semi/
Hazmat
Total
Queue Auto School
Bus
Passenger
Bus
Truck/
Semi/
Hazmat
Total
Queue

1.001 03/11/2020 6:13:21 AM Passenger SB 6:13:15 6:13:43 0:00:28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.002 03/11/2020 6:25:31 AM Freight NB 6:25:23 6:27:13 0:01:50 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.003 03/11/2020 6:35:44 AM Passenger NB 6:35:36 6:36:04 0:00:28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.004 03/11/2020 6:59:56 AM Passenger SB 6:59:55 7:00:49 0:00:54 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.005 03/11/2020 7:15:10 AM Passenger SB 7:15:01 7:15:52 0:00:51 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.006 03/11/2020 7:37:46 AM Passenger NB 7:37:39 7:38:09 0:00:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.007 03/11/2020 7:42:48 AM Passenger SB 7:42:38 7:43:27 0:00:49 12 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.008 03/11/2020 8:13:09 AM Passenger SB 8:13:01 8:14:02 0:01:01 7 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.009 03/11/2020 9:09:53 AM Passenger NB 9:09:41 9:10:10 0:00:29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.010 03/11/2020 9:24:25 AM Passenger SB 9:24:07 9:24:43 0:00:36 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.011 03/11/2020 10:14:12 AM Passenger NB 10:13:59 10:14:33 0:00:34 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.012 03/11/2020 10:38:16 AM Freight SB 10:37:48 10:40:01 0:02:13 5 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.013 03/11/2020 10:53:48 AM Freight SB 10:53:39 10:55:40 0:02:01 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.014 03/11/2020 10:59:39 AM Passenger SB 10:59:27 10:59:57 0:00:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.015 03/11/2020 11:30:01 AM Passenger NB 11:29:50 11:30:19 0:00:29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.016 03/11/2020 12:51:30 PM Passenger SB 12:51:17 12:52:24 0:01:07 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.017 03/11/2020 1:27:03 PM Passenger NB 13:26:50 13:27:22 0:00:32 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.018 03/11/2020 2:51:17 PM Passenger NB 14:51:04 14:51:35 0:00:31 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.019 03/11/2020 2:55:59 PM Passenger SB 14:55:50 14:56:18 0:00:28 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.020 03/11/2020 3:03:25 PM No Train SB 15:03:11 15:04:09 0:00:58 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railway vehicle passing

1.021 03/11/2020 3:17:54 PM Passenger SB 15:17:23 15:18:27 0:01:04 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.022 03/11/2020 4:07:19 PM Passenger NB 16:07:03 16:07:40 0:00:37 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.023 03/11/2020 4:17:30 PM Passenger SB 16:17:15 0:03:15

1.024 03/11/2020 4:18:25 PM Freight NB 16:20:30 0:03:15

1.025 03/11/2020 4:35:52 PM Freight NB 16:35:38 16:36:37 0:00:59 13 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.026 03/11/2020 4:50:38 PM Passenger NB 16:50:26 16:50:59 0:00:33 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.027 03/11/2020 5:25:46 PM Passenger SB 17:25:31 17:26:03 0:00:32 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.028 03/11/2020 5:28:44 PM Passenger NB 17:28:30 17:29:03 0:00:33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0:28:07 87 1 1 1 0 56 0 3 0 0 68 0 2 1 0 48 2 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.001 03/12/2020 6:12:51 AM Passenger SB 6:12:37 6:13:11 0:00:34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.002 03/12/2020 6:37:10 AM Passenger NB 6:37:00 6:37:29 0:00:29 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.003 03/12/2020 7:02:43 AM Passenger SB 7:02:33 7:03:03 0:00:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.004 03/12/2020 7:12:00 AM Freight NB 7:11:49 7:14:08 0:02:19 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.005 03/12/2020 7:23:46 AM Freight NB 7:23:32 7:24:14 0:00:42 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.006 03/12/2020 7:43:04 AM Passenger SB 7:42:51 7:43:24 0:00:33 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.007 03/12/2020 7:55:27 AM Passenger NB 7:55:18 7:55:47 0:00:29 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.008 03/12/2020 8:14:32 AM Passenger SB 8:14:11 8:14:56 0:00:45 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.009 03/12/2020 8:22:19 AM Passenger SB 8:21:58 8:22:49 0:00:51 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.010 03/12/2020 9:16:47 AM Passenger NB 9:16:37 9:17:09 0:00:32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.011 03/12/2020 9:30:03 AM Passenger SB 9:29:57 9:30:58 0:01:01 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.012 03/12/2020 10:14:22 AM Passenger NB 10:14:05 10:14:49 0:00:44 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.013 03/12/2020 10:38:38 AM No Train SB 10:38:27 10:38:49 0:00:22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railway vehicle passing

2.014 03/12/2020 11:00:41 AM Passenger SB 11:00:32 11:01:27 0:00:55 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.015 03/12/2020 11:24:57 AM Freight SB 11:24:52 11:25:36 0:00:44 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.016 03/12/2020 11:26:25 AM Freight SB 11:25:59 11:28:17 0:02:18 3 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.017 03/12/2020 11:54:37 AM Passenger NB 11:54:19 11:54:56 0:00:37 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.018 03/12/2020 12:51:41 PM Passenger SB 12:51:31 12:52:34 0:01:03 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.019 03/12/2020 1:32:22 PM Passenger NB 13:32:13 13:32:41 0:00:28 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.020 03/12/2020 2:39:39 PM Passenger NB 14:39:39 14:39:58 0:00:19 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.021 03/12/2020 2:47:24 PM Passenger SB 14:47:13 14:47:41 0:00:28 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.022 03/12/2020 3:33:14 PM Passenger SB 15:33:02 15:33:35 0:00:33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.023 03/12/2020 4:14:15 PM Passenger NB 16:14:01 16:14:32 0:00:31 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.024 03/12/2020 4:27:20 PM Freight NB 16:27:04 16:30:43 0:03:39 17 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.025 03/12/2020 4:49:35 PM Passenger NB 16:49:21 16:49:55 0:00:34 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.026 03/12/2020 5:18:14 PM Passenger NB 17:18:00 17:18:34 0:00:34 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.027 26 0:22:34 51 1 0 1 0 59 0 1 1 0 81 2 2 0 0 42 0 1 1 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 Total Trains 0:50:41 Total Trains

7.7 Ave per day 0:07:14 Ave per day

13.0 Typical ave day 0:11:17 Typical ave day

11.8 Typ Passenger

1.2 Typ Freight
WB Number of Cars affected Lane 1 WB Number of Cars affected Lane 2 NB Number of Cars affected (Railroad Ave) Lane 1 Barrier
Down Barrier Up
Arms Down
Duration
(min and sec)
EB Number of Cars affected Lane 1 EB Number of Cars affected Lane 2 Unique
Instance Date Time of
Occurrence
Type of Train
(Freight/
Passenger)
Train
Traveling
Direction
(EB/WB)
5 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Comments
2 Train Pass0 0 0 0 0
NB Number of Cars affected (Railroad Ave) Lane 2
193
Attachment 2
SimTraffic Results
194
SimTraffic Post-Processor E Tabor Ave at Railroad Ave
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Conditions
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 1 Clay Bank Road/E Tabor Avenue All-way Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 326 327 100.2% 25.7 11.6 D
Through
Right Turn 269 268 99.7% 11.8 3.8 B
Subtotal 595 595 100.0% 19.5 7.7 C
Left Turn 148 152 102.4% 12.0 2.0 B
Through 189 184 97.2% 12.0 1.3 B
Right Turn
Subtotal 337 335 99.5% 12.0 1.6 B
Left Turn
Through 293 299 101.9% 21.1 7.1 C
Right Turn 318 308 96.9% 8.7 2.9 A
Subtotal 611 607 99.3% 15.2 4.7 C
Total 1,543 1,537 99.6% 16.3 4.8 C

14.8 Intersection 2 Railroad Avenue/E Tabor Avenue Side-street Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn 116 116 99.8% 234.4 90.4 F
Through
Right Turn 206 209 101.6% 115.6 75.6 F
Subtotal 322 325 100.9% 162.9 77.4 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 324 329 101.5% 0.8 0.2 A
Right Turn 191 185 97.0% 0.8 0.2 A
Subtotal 515 514 99.8% 0.8 0.1 A
Left Turn 285 289 101.5% 11.5 1.7 B
Through 495 486 98.2% 7.1 1.5 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 780 775 99.4% 8.7 1.5 A
Total 1,617 1,614 99.8% 41.4 15.3 E

81.4 Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Fehr & Peers 5/28/2020
195
SimTraffic Post-Processor E Tabor Ave at Railroad Ave
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Conditions
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 3 Olive Avenue/E Tabor Avenue Side-street Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn 27 26 94.4% 32.3 11.9 D
Through
Right Turn 16 16 101.3% 16.7 19.2 C
Subtotal 43 42 97.0% 23.9 13.1 C
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 511 513 100.3% 1.0 0.1 A
Right Turn 19 19 97.9% 0.5 0.3 A
Subtotal 530 531 100.2% 0.9 0.1 A
Left Turn 9 7 78.9% 6.3 5.3 A
Through 753 750 99.5% 3.0 2.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 762 757 99.3% 3.0 2.1 A
Total 1,335 1,330 99.6% 3.0 1.6 A

14.8 Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Fehr & Peers 5/28/2020
196
SimTraffic Post-Processor E Tabor Ave at Railroad Ave
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Conditions
Volume and Delay by Movement PM Peak Hour
Intersection 1 Clay Bank Road/E Tabor Avenue All-way Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 244 242 99.1% 9.5 1.7 A
Through
Right Turn 178 178 99.7% 5.3 0.9 A
Subtotal 422 419 99.3% 7.6 1.2 A
Left Turn 200 201 100.5% 10.2 2.0 B
Through 269 270 100.3% 12.1 1.3 B
Right Turn
Subtotal 469 471 100.4% 11.3 1.5 B
Left Turn
Through 210 211 100.2% 12.1 2.5 B
Right Turn 186 189 101.4% 5.5 0.8 A
Subtotal 396 399 100.8% 9.0 1.6 A
Total 1,287 1,289 100.2% 9.4 1.4 A

11.6 Intersection 2 Railroad Avenue/E Tabor Avenue Side-street Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn 92 91 98.8% 29.0 12.2 D
Through
Right Turn 230 223 97.0% 6.2 1.6 A
Subtotal 322 314 97.5% 13.3 4.8 B
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 355 354 99.7% 0.9 0.1 A
Right Turn 158 158 99.7% 0.7 0.2 A
Subtotal 513 511 99.7% 0.8 0.1 A
Left Turn 152 152 99.9% 8.6 3.9 A
Through 304 309 101.7% 5.3 3.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 456 461 101.1% 6.3 3.1 A
Total 1,291 1,287 99.7% 5.8 2.2 A

29.0 Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Fehr & Peers 5/28/2020
197
SimTraffic Post-Processor E Tabor Ave at Railroad Ave
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Conditions
Volume and Delay by Movement PM Peak Hour
Intersection 3 Olive Avenue/E Tabor Avenue Side-street Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn 20 19 96.0% 16.1 6.7 C
Through
Right Turn 10 11 110.0% 6.5 4.4 A
Subtotal 30 30 100.7% 11.7 3.0 B
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 547 542 99.1% 1.0 0.2 A
Right Turn 38 36 95.5% 0.6 0.3 A
Subtotal 585 578 98.8% 1.0 0.2 A
Left Turn 10 9 91.0% 4.2 2.4 A
Through 436 441 101.1% 1.1 0.3 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 446 450 100.9% 1.2 0.4 A
Total 1,061 1,059 99.8% 1.4 0.3 A

8.5 Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Fehr & Peers 5/28/2020
198
SimTraffic Post-Processor
Average Results from 10 Runs
Volume and Delay by Movement
E Tabor Ave at Railroad Ave
Cumulative Conditions
AM Peak Hour
Intersection 1 Clay Bank Road/E Tabor Avenue All-way Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 375 378 100.9% 71.0 66.5 F
Through
Right Turn 309 303 98.2% 12.6 3.4 B
Subtotal 684 682 99.6% 46.1 39.4 E
Left Turn 170 174 102.1% 15.8 4.3 C
Through 226 217 96.2% 13.8 1.6 B
Right Turn
Subtotal 396 391 98.7% 14.8 2.7 B
Left Turn
Through 376 356 94.6% 39.2 21.3 E
Right Turn 366 333 91.1% 11.4 3.5 B
Subtotal 742 689 92.9% 26.1 12.2 D
Total 1,822 1,762 96.7% 31.7 19.1 D

30.2 Intersection 2 Railroad Avenue/E Tabor Avenue Side-street Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn 135 60 44.2% 661.0 44.2 F
Through
Right Turn 241 241 99.9% 194.4 169.0 F
Subtotal 376 300 79.9% 302.5 136.7 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 378 381 100.9% 0.8 0.1 A
Right Turn 223 224 100.2% 0.5 0.2 A
Subtotal 601 605 100.6% 0.7 0.1 A
Left Turn 333 328 98.4% 9.7 1.4 A
Through 607 621 102.3% 9.2 2.2 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 940 949 101.0% 9.4 1.8 A
Total 1,917 1,854 96.7% 56.6 20.3 F
386.2
Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Fehr & Peers 5/28/2020
199
SimTraffic Post-Processor
Average Results from 10 Runs
Volume and Delay by Movement
E Tabor Ave at Railroad Ave
Cumulative Conditions
AM Peak Hour
Intersection 3 Olive Avenue/E Tabor Avenue Side-street Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn 60 59 97.5% 90.1 64.1 F
Through
Right Turn 29 30 102.8% 76.2 83.6 F
Subtotal 89 88 99.2% 82.9 68.0 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 593 587 99.0% 1.2 0.2 A
Right Turn 26 27 105.0% 0.7 0.4 A
Subtotal 619 614 99.2% 1.2 0.2 A
Left Turn 14 13 91.4% 7.4 2.6 A
Through 880 890 101.2% 4.7 2.2 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 894 903 101.0% 4.8 2.1 A
Total 1,602 1,606 100.2% 7.4 3.6 A

48.3 Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Fehr & Peers 5/28/2020
200
SimTraffic Post-Processor E Tabor Avenue at Railroad Avenue Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Conditions
Volume and Delay by Movement PM Peak Hour
Intersection 1 Clay Bank Road/E Tabor Avenue All-way Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 338 334 98.9% 40.9 21.7 E
Through
Right Turn 246 244 99.1% 9.5 1.7 A
Subtotal 584 578 99.0% 27.8 13.4 D
Left Turn 277 282 101.7% 67.4 36.8 F
Through 398 395 99.2% 70.7 35.6 F
Right Turn
Subtotal 675 677 100.2% 69.3 35.8 F
Left Turn
Through 309 297 96.1% 28.3 8.2 D
Right Turn 257 252 97.9% 12.6 2.8 B
Subtotal 566 548 96.9% 21.4 4.8 C
Total 1,825 1,803 98.8% 42.1 15.7 E

26.7 Intersection 2 Railroad Avenue/E Tabor Avenue Side-street Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn 128 111 86.5% 459.4 67.1 F
Through
Right Turn 324 322 99.3% 21.4 11.2 C
Subtotal 452 432 95.6% 131.6 21.3 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 515 504 97.8% 1.1 0.1 A
Right Turn 221 226 102.3% 0.6 0.3 A
Subtotal 736 730 99.2% 1.0 0.1 A
Left Turn 213 208 97.4% 13.3 4.3 B
Through 438 437 99.7% 10.4 3.7 B
Right Turn
Subtotal 651 644 99.0% 11.3 3.8 B
Total 1,839 1,807 98.2% 36.9 5.6 E
204.2
WB
Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
Fehr & Peers 6/5/2020
201
SimTraffic Post-Processor E Tabor Avenue at Railroad Avenue Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Conditions
Volume and Delay by Movement PM Peak Hour
Intersection 3 Olive Avenue/E Tabor Avenue Side-street Stop Demand Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Volume (vph) Average Percent Average Std. Dev. LOS Left Turn 42 38 90.2% 27.5 11.7 D
Through
Right Turn 21 20 95.7% 11.5 5.9 B
Subtotal 63 58 92.1% 21.5 8.5 C
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 758 746 98.4% 2.1 0.5 A
Right Turn 81 80 99.0% 1.1 0.4 A
Subtotal 839 826 98.5% 1.9 0.5 A
Left Turn 28 30 105.7% 8.6 5.3 A
Through 609 604 99.2% 3.1 1.5 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 637 634 99.5% 3.4 1.7 A
Total 1,539 1,518 98.6% 3.3 1.1 A

27.5 Served Volume (vph)
NB
SB
EB
WB
Fehr & Peers 6/5/2020
202
General Plan Amendment to Eliminate a
Planned Roadway Realignment
California Environmental Quality Act
Categorical Exemption Report
prepared by
City of Suisun
701 Civic Center Boulevard
Suisun City, California 94585
Contact: John Kearns, Principal Planner
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
4825 J Street, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95819
June 2023
203
General Plan Amendment to Eliminate a
Planned Roadway Realignment
California Environmental Quality Act
Categorical Exemption Report
prepared by
City of Suisun
701 Civic Center Boulevard
Suisun City, California 94585
Contact: John Kearns, Principal Planner
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
4825 J Street, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95819
June 2023
204
This page intentionally left blank.
205
206
Table of Contents
California Environmental Quality Act Categorical Exemption Report i Table of Contents
Categorical Exemption Report ................................................................................................................ 1

1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1

2. Project Area and Existing Conditions .......................................................................................... 2

3. Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 2

4. Consistency Analysis ................................................................................................................... 5

5. Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 7

6. References .................................................................................................................................. 8 Figures
Figure 1 Project Location Map ........................................................................................................ 3 Figure 2 Project Area Map............................................................................................................... 4 207
City of Suisun
General Plan Amendment to Eliminate a Planned Roadway Realignment ii
This page intentionally left blank.
208
Categorical Exemption Report
California Environmental Quality Act Categorical Exemption Report 1 Categorical Exemption Report
This report serves as the documentation of an environmental analysis performed by Rincon Consultants, Inc. for a proposed General Plan amendment to remove the Railroad Avenue realignment from East Tabor Avenue to Olive Avenue from the General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network Diagram (proposed project). The intent of the analysis is to document how and why the project is eligible for Class 1 Categorical Exemptions (CE), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This report provides an introduction, project description, and evaluation of the project’s consistency with the requirements for a Class 1 CE. The report demonstrates that the project is eligible for Class 1 CE.

1. Introduction
Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that a Class 1 CE is for the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration to existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Sections 15301(a) through (p) provide a non-inclusive list of example projects that are covered under a Class 1 CE. The key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of use.” Among the examples listed in the Guidelines under this exemption are existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities that do not create additional automobile lanes.

Additionally, State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15300.2(a) through (f) list specific exceptions for which, if applicable, a CE may not be used. These exceptions are as follows:
a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.
b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.
209
City of Suisun
General Plan Amendment to Eliminate a Planned Roadway Realignment 2 e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

2. Project Area and Existing Conditions
The project area consists of an existing rail crossing and paved roads located at the intersection of East Tabor Avenue and Railroad Avenue in the City of Suisun City, as shown on Figure 1 and Figure 2. The area where the proposed Railroad Avenue realignment is proposed for removal is currently zoned as Commercial Service and Fabricating (CSF) according to the City’s zoning map (City of Suisun City 2016).

The site has a land use designation of Commercial Mixed Use according the City of Suisun City General Plan. Both East Tabor Avenue and Railroad Avenue are paved with railroad traffic control devices located on East Tabor Avenue at the rail crossing. The project area is surrounded by residential uses to the northwest, a church to the northeast, and commercial and fabrication uses to the south.

3. Project Description
The City of Suisun City has proposed a General Plan amendment to remove the planned Railroad Avenue realignment from Railroad Avenue/Humphrey Drive to Olive Avenue from the General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network Diagram. The General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network Diagram currently shows plans for a realignment that would modify portion of Railroad Avenue south of the East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue intersection such that Railroad Avenue would only provide ingress/egress to the storage facility and no longer be a through street, and route Railroad Avenue to the east to Olive Avenue, per Figure 2. The project would consist of amending the General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network Diagram to remove this realignment, and that the proposed realignment of Railroad Avenue does not occur. Therefore, no development is proposed at the project area, no roadway improvements in this area would occur, and the existing conditions of the site would remain unchanged. 210
Categorical Exemption Report
California Environmental Quality Act Categorical Exemption Report 3 Figure 1 Project Location Map
211
City of Suisun
General Plan Amendment to Eliminate a Planned Roadway Realignment 4 Figure 2 Project Area Map
212
Categorical Exemption Report
California Environmental Quality Act Categorical Exemption Report 5

4. Consistency Analysis
Class 1 CE Applicability
Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines state that a Class 1 CE is for the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration to existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The project includes a General Plan amendment to remove the Railroad Avenue realignment from Railroad Avenue/Humphrey Drive to Olive Avenue from the General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network Diagram. The amendment would result in the East Tabor Avenue/Railroad Avenue intersection and segment of Railroad Avenue between East Tabor Avenue and Humphrey Drive remaining unchanged. Therefore, no development would occur, and the existing conditions of the project area would remain the same.

Therefore, the proposed General Plan amendment to remove the Railroad Avenue realignment would meet the applicability requirements for a Class 1 CE pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Exceptions to CE Applicability
The applicability of all CEs is qualified by the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2(a) through (f) of the State CEQA Guidelines. In the discussion below, each exception (in italics) is followed by an explanation of why the exception does not apply to the proposed project. 15300.2(a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.

The project area is currently developed with the paved roads of East Tabor Avenue and Railroad Avenue, and a rail crossing. There are no wetlands, streams, aquatic or riparian habitat, or other designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted environmentally sensitive resources of critical concern on or directly adjacent to the project area (USFWS 2023). Additionally, the project area is within an urbanized area of Suisun City, which is developed with commercial buildings, sidewalks, roads, parking areas, and other similar urban development. The project area is not located in an environmentally sensitive area.

There are no environmental resources of hazardous or critical concern that are designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies on the project area, such as critical habitat for listed threatened or endangered species. According to a search of the Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor database conducted on April 20, 2023, there are no designated hazardous waste sites on or within the immediate vicinity. Similarly, a search of the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker database showed no cleanup sites in the vicinity of the project area. Therefore, this exception to a CE does not apply to the proposed project. 213
City of Suisun
General Plan Amendment to Eliminate a Planned Roadway Realignment 6 15300.2(b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.

The proposed project would not result in significant environmental impacts and there are no other successive projects of the same type or scale planned for the same location. In addition, the proposed project proposes that planned changes to the roadway network not take place at the project area, with a General Plan amendment to reflect elimination of this planned realignment. Areas surrounding the project area are developed with commercial facilities to the south, and no additional facilities or changes are proposed at this time. Areas to the northwest of the project area are developed with residential development and are located within the City of Fairfield. The church located northeast of the project area and undeveloped areas to the east of the project site are also located in the City of Fairfield.

No significant cumulative impact would result from successive projects of the same type in the same place over time. Therefore, this exception to a CE does not apply to the proposed project. 15300.2(c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

The project area is at the intersection of East Tabor Avenue and Railroad Avenue, and is developed with structures, paved areas, and an existing rail crossing. There are no wetlands, streams, aquatic or riparian habitat, unique cultural or historic sites, scenic vistas, or other unusual circumstances on or adjacent to the project area. The project would not disturb natural habitats or unusual resources, such as vernal pools or steep slopes. The disturbance required to install the solar arrays and equipment would occur within areas developed with existing onsite pavement and structures, as well as gravel and bare dirt areas. As the project involves removing the planned realignment of Railroad Avenue, no development would occur and no tree removal would take place. Due to the absence of unusual circumstances on the project area, the project would not have a reasonable possibility of a significant effect on the environment. This exception to a CE does not apply to the proposed project. 15300.2(d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.

According to the California Department of Transportation (2023), there are no officially designated scenic highways within five miles of the project area. The nearest highway eligible for designation is a portion of Highway 221 which is located approximately 14 miles west of the project area. The nearest designated highway is Route 160 near the City of Walnut Grove approximately 25 miles east of the project area. The project area is not visible from Highway 221 or Route 160 due to distance and intervening topography and development. Therefore, this exception to a CE does not apply to the proposed project.
15300.2(e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

According to a search of the Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor database and State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker database conducted on April 20, 2023, there are no records 214
Categorical Exemption Report
California Environmental Quality Act Categorical Exemption Report 7 of open or active designated hazardous waste sites on or within the immediate vicinity of the project area. Therefore, this exception to a CE does not apply to the proposed project. 15300.2(f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

According to a record search conducted by Rincon Consultants in April 2023 through the National Record of Historic Places (NRHP), no structures in the project area are listed as a historic resource. The project would not result in any construction, and thus would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Therefore, this exception to a CE does not apply to the proposed project.

5. Summary
Based on this analysis, the proposed General Plan amendment to remove the Railroad Avenue realignment from Railroad Avenue/Humphrey Drive to Olive Avenue from the General Plan Vehicular Transportation Network Diagram meets all criteria for a Class 1 CE pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, exceptions to the applicability of a CE, as specified in Section 15300.2(a) through (f) of the State CEQA Guidelines, do not apply to the project. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301.
215
City of Suisun
General Plan Amendment to Eliminate a Planned Roadway Realignment 8 6. References
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. EnviroStor Database. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=East+Tabor+Avenue+%26+Railroa d+Avenue%2C+Fairfield%2C+CA%2C+USA. (accessed April 2023).

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2023. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e805 7116f1aacaa. (accessed April 2023).

California State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker Database. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=East+Tabor+Avenue +%26+Railroad+Avenue%2C+Fairfield%2C+CA%2C+USA. (accessed April 2023).

National Parks Service. National Register of Historic Places. https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/SearchResults/8286d9f583b24f0384e8203ab210c5f6?page=1& view=list&sort=default. (accessed April 2023).

Suisun City, City of. 2015. City of Suisun City 2035 General Plan. https://www.suisun.com/files/sharedassets/suisuncity/departments/development- services/documents/gp-vol_1_ch1-3.pdf (accessed April 2023). ______. 2016. Zoning Map.
https://www.suisun.com/files/sharedassets/suisuncity/departments/development- services/documents/zoning_map_-_suisun_city_-_2017.pdf (accessed April 2023).

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. National Wetlands Inventory: Wetlands Mapper [map database]. https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/ (access April 2023).
216
General Plan Vehicular T ransportation Diagram
Amendment
Suisun City, City Council
March 19, 2024
Background
 General Plan Elements
 Transportation Element – Goals and Policy
Statements
 Diagram and Exhibits
 Evaluate and Consider Changes
 Action by PC and City Council
1 2
217
Current
Condition
 Railroad Avenue – function and realignment
 Prior General Plans – policy statement
 1992 General Plan
 General Plan 2035
 Planning Commission Meeting
- Funding condition
- Proposed project
General Plan 2035 – Vehicular Transportation Diagram
(Current Condition)
3 4
218
General Plan 2035 – Vehicular Transportation Diagram
(Proposed Condition)
General Plan 2035 – Vehicular Transportation Diagram
(Proposed Condition)
5 6
219
Evaluation
 Traffic Engineer – key areas of focus
 LOS and Safety
 General Plan Consistency
 Findings - recommendation
General Plan 2035 – Cumulative Conditions
7 8
220
City Council
Action

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council hold a public hearing, and:

1. Determine that the General Plan Amendment to remove
the Railroad Avenue realignment from Railroad Avenue to Olive Avenue from the General Plan Vehicular
Transportation Diagram meets all criteria for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the
State CEQA Guidelines.

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-___: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Suisun City Recommending the City Council Amend the Transportation Element, Amend the
Vehicular Transportation Diagram removing the Railroad
Avenue Alignment connecting to Olive Avenue.
9 221

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
222

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL
MEETING DATE: March 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Discussion and Direction Regarding the Continued Use of Funding for Shelter Beds to House Homeless from Suisun City under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Shelter Solano.

FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for continued sponsorship of shelter beds for the remainder of the year could be up to $57,000. Sufficient funding is available in the FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) fund ($30,000 available) and General Fund Surplus.

STRATEGIC PLAN: Provide Good Governance, Section 4.7 – Improve productivity, efficiency, effectiveness, customer service and citizen satisfaction in all areas of municipal organization.

BACKGROUND: Suisun City has previously sponsored two shelter beds with Shelter Solano to ensure city staff can connect homeless individuals in Suisun City with shelter services. Sponsoring shelter beds also assists with staff’s ability to conduct encampment abatements and clean-ups within the guidelines of the Martin v Boise, Ninth Circuit Court decision.

Shelter Solano provides “wrap-around” services with the goal of assisting homeless individuals in becoming self-sufficient. Suisun City has been sponsoring two shelter beds at Shelter Solano since February of 2021. During the FY23-24 budget, Suisun City entered into an MOU with Shelter Solano sponsoring two shelter beds for the year for a cost of $68,400.

In total, eight homeless individuals have been sheltered Since July 1, 2023, at different times throughout the fiscal year, and the Suisun City Police Department has responded to a total of 251 homeless encampment related calls where staff were able to offer assistance to the homeless in as many instances.

Additionally, PD staff were able to request some of our homeless remove their encampments approximately 251 separate times after they refused shelter services during that same timeframe. This ability to offer shelter services is essential to continue conducting cleanups of homeless encampments that create refuse and other unsafe conditions in our public areas.

STAFF REPORT: During FY23/24, Suisun City entered into a contract with Shelter Solano to retain access to two shelter beds for the entire fiscal year. This is a total of 730 “bed nights” for the year.

Because Suisun City had unused “bed nights” in previous years and was seeing an occasional need to house more than two homeless individuals at a time, Shelter Solano altered their business model to allow Suisun City to access a total of 730 “bed nights” in FY23/24 without capping the access to only two beds at a time, but noting any overages would cost the city $2,850 for one bed per month, to be utilized in the same manner as the MOU currently provides. At one point during FY23/24, Suisun City was assisting a total of seven people at the same time through access to these shelter beds.

Shelter Solano staff recently contacted City Staff to advise Suisun City had exhausted its 730 “bed nights” going into the month of March 2024. Shelter Solano advised Suisun City currently has five individuals receiving shelter services and that continuing service to these five individuals will cost the city $14,250 a month (5@$2,850 per mo.) unless there are discharges and the City does not refer services to any new individuals.

Agenda Item No. 14
223
While continuing this partnership with Shelter Solano through the end of FY23/24 will potentially cost the city up to $57,000 for the remainder of the fiscal year to continue securing five shelter beds, it will also allow city staff to periodically abate illegal homeless encampments. Once currently sheltered individuals are discharged and shelter beds become available, PD staff can continue to enforce the City’s camping ordinance and attempt to remove encampments.

Should the city terminate the partnership with Shelter Solano, PD staff will no longer be able to proactively clear illegal encampments by way of ordinance enforcement or shelter referrals. While referrals can still be made to some of the faith-based shelter organizations for those willing, Shelter Solano is the only shelter in the area that offers services that are not faith-based that can be accessed on a contractual basis. Other faith-based shelter services in Solano County are on a first come, first serve basis that might not have availability when needed.

Staff is seeking a recommendation at this time to:

Continue sponsoring up to five beds at any one time, at a potential charge to the City of $57,000 for the remainder of this fiscal year leaving any beds related to discharges from the program open to new referrals.

Continued encampment enforcement can only occur as discharges happen.

Continue housing any individuals currently receiving Shelter Solano services, while not referring any new homeless individuals when people are discharged from the shelter. A cost of up to $57,000 for the remainder of the fiscal year, but likely less due to foreseeable discharges reducing the beds the City will pay for.

Does not allow for the continued enforcement of encampments per Martin v. Boise.

Sever the MOU with Shelter Solano for the remainder of the fiscal year, requesting all those referred by and sheltered under Suisun City’s agreement be discharged at the end of March, 2024.

A cost of no more than $14,250 for the remainder of FY23/24.

Does not allow for the continued enforcement of encampments per Martin v. Boise through the end of FY23/24.

Direction given will come back on the consent calendar for the April 2, 2024, meeting with resolutions and appropriation amendments.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Discussion and direction to staff regarding Shelter Solano services to Suisun City homeless individuals.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

1. MOU with Shelter Solano

2. PowerPoint Presentation
PREPARED BY: Aaron Roth, Interim City Manager
REVIEWED BY: Kris Lofthus, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED BY: Kris Lofthus, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

1. MOU with Shelter Solano

2. PowerPoint Presentation
224
ME

MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
07/24/2023 1/6
Suisun City Police Department (hereinafter "SCPD") and SHELTER Solano, Inc. (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR") hereby enter into this MOU for the provision of CONTRACTOR providing shelter care for the participants referred by SCPD.

DEFINITIONS
In this MOU, the following words and expression shall have the meanings hereby assigned to them except where the context otherwise requires:

Agreement shall mean this MOU, including Exhibits and fully executed amendments hereto.

Scope of Work shall mean a list and description of the services to be performed, including all responsibilities of the CONTRACTOR and any policies and procedures to be followed during the course of the Work, fees/rates/payment schedules of described Work, as listed in Exhibit A.

Change Order shall mean an order, issued pursuant to Item 2 of this agreement, for changes in the scope, nature, quantity, timing, and/or price of the Work.

Work Order shall mean an order, issued pursuant to Item 2, where SCPD requests CONTRACTOR to supply or perform services and Contactor agrees to perform such services as listed within the Scope of Work as listed in Exhibit A.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF T HE PARTIES
Parties understand that each should be able to fulfill its responsibilities under this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in accordance with the provisions of law and regulation that govern their individual activities. Nothing in this MOU is intended to negate or otherwise render ineffective any such provisions or operating procedures.

If at any time any parties are unable to perform their functions under this MOU consistent with such parties statutory and regulatory mandates, the affected parties shall immediately provide written notice to the others seeking a mutually agreed upon resolution.
225
ME

MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
07/24/2023 2/6

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants hereinafter stated, the Parties agree as follows:

1. SERVICES

1.1 During the term of this agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish the services set forth in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, attached hereto and included by this reference. CONTRACTOR will provide the services as an independent contractor and not as an employee of SCPD.

2. WORK ORDERS, CHANGE ORDERS

2.1 If at any time during the term of this Agreement, SCPD through one or more written work orders, delivery tickets, or other instruments, requests CONTRACTOR to supply or perform services, and
CONTRACTOR agrees to perform those services, each such request regardless of form shall be deemed a “Work Order” governed by and subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement. Agreements or stipulations on any Work Order that are contrary to any term of this agreement shall be void, unless CONTRACTOR and SCPD have expressly agreed in writing that such agreement or stipulation shall supersede the terms of this agreement.

2.2 In the event that SCPD requests CONTRACTOR to perform services that are outside the scope of work as listed in Exhibit A, such services and a compensation schedule therefore must be mutually agreed upon by both parties in a written “Change Order” prior to the provision of said services. The Change Order constitutes an amendment to the applicable Work Order, and the services set forth therein shall be deemed to be part of such Work Order.

3. LABOR, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, AND SERVICES

3.1 Upon receipt of a mutually agreeable Work Order, CONTRACTOR shall begin furnishing the services according to the specifications and requirements of this agreement and the Work Order.

3.2 All services rendered by CONTRACTOR hereunder shall be performed in accordance with industry standards as applicable to the region or area where the work is to be performed. All materials and equipment furnished by CONTRACTOR in the performance of services hereunder shall be free from material defects. Any of the materials, equipment, or services found to be materially defective shall be at CONTRACTOR’s 226
ME

MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
07/24/2023 3/6
sole discretion, either removed, replaced or corrected by CONTRACTOR without additional cost to SCPD.

3.3 CONTRACTOR shall maintain its equipment in operating condition at all times and shall use commercially reasonable means to control and prevent fires and blowouts, protect the hole, and prevent damage to PHC’s equipment.

4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

4.1 During the term of this agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish the services set forth in Exhibit A. CONTRACTOR also agrees that he/she is not and will not become an employee, agent or principal of SCPD while this agreement is in effect. CONTRACTOR agrees that they are not entitled to the rights or benefits afforded to SCPD employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. CONTRACTOR is responsible for providing, at their own expense, disability, unemployment and other insurance, workers' compensation, training, permits and licenses.

5. INDEMNIFICATION and INSURANCE

5.1 CONTRACTOR agrees to hold harmless and indemnify SCPD for any and all claims arising out of any injury, disability or death.

5.2 The term of this agreement shall extend from month to month.

6. DURATION and COMPENSATION

6.1 SCPD will pay CONTRACTOR a total of $5,700 per month for access to two beds. Additional beds are available for $2,850.00 per month, per bed, as requested and referred to CONTRACTOR.

6.2 CONTRACTOR retains the right to accept or refuse referral based on eligibility and gender bed availability.

6.3 Payment for services rendered shall be made by SCPD upon submission by CONTRACTOR invoices. The invoices will bed allotment agreed to by contract.

7. CONFIDENTIALITY

7.1 CONTRACTOR shall not use for personal gain and shall preserve as confidential all privileged information acquired from SCPD in the performance of this Agreement. The term "privileged information" shall include without limitation unpublished information and data 227
ME

MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
07/24/2023 4/6
related to operations of SCPD, any and all beneficiary information and plans, methods, processes, internal specifications and reports The parties have executed this Memorandum of Understanding on the date first written above.

SHELTER Solano, Inc.
__
_____________________________
Signature
___John Eckstrom_ _______________
Printed Name
___Chief Executive Officer__ ________
Title
_______________________________
Dat
e
PO Box 5368 ______
Concord, CA 94524_______________
Address
City of Suisun City
__
_____________________________
Signature
_______________________________
Printed Name
_______________________________
Title
_______________________________
Date
______________________________
______________________________
Address
228
ME

MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
07/24/2023 5/6
Exhibit A — Scope of Work
Facilities:

SHELTER Solano, Inc. will provide shelter care to SCPD clients for persons experiencing homelessness. SHELTER Solano, Inc. shall ensure that the facility provides safe accommodations, 24/7 on site non-medical supervision, and case management services that meet the minimum requirements set by the State of California Health and Safety Code for Emergency Housing and Assistance Programs.

Services Provided by SHELTER Solano, Inc.:

SHELTER Solano, Inc. shall provide the following services to SCPD referrals:
• Enrollment in the county’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) for all NHBC members.
• Safe and secure housing
• Limited Secured storage for personal belongings and medications • Three (3) meals a day that meet basic nutrition standards • At least one wellness check every 24 hours
• Individualized service plan and focused case management services to promote overall well-being.
• Assistance in planning and implementing goals pertaining to health, wellness and permanent housing.
• Onsite life skills classes including, Money Management, Conflict Resolution, Parenting, and Employment Skills Facilitation of member’s access to available public benefits (e.g. Veteran’s, SNAP and medical)
• Employment and education services
• Referrals to legal aid to assist in resolving barriers to housing and employment
• Referrals to partnering social services agencies (e.g., alcohol and substance abuse treatment, housing)
Collab
oration with Suisun City Police Department and its Contracted Providers:

SHELTER Solano, Inc. shall accept referrals of SCPD upon approval of designated SCPD staff.
229
ME

MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
07/24/2023 6/6
SHELTER Solano, Inc. shall collaborate with SCPD staff to gather necessary information on the homeless individual, including confidentiality releases for the sharing of information and information to determine eligibility.

All referrals to SHELTER Solano, Inc. must include information to determine eligibility of the participant. This ensures a successful experience for SCPD and for the individual being referred. Failure to do so may result in a denial of services based on being un-eligible to stay within the facility.

Rate Structure:

Suisun City Police Department shall pay SHELTER Solano, Inc. $5,700.00 per month, for two beds directly referred to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will retain the right to accept or decline referral, depending upon eligibility and gender availability of beds. SCPD shall have 30 days from the date of the invoice to pay the amount due thereon, or notify CONTRACTOR in writing of a bona fide dispute asserted in good faith as to one or more of the invoice items.

Term:

The term for this contract is July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024. 230
Discussion and Direction Regarding
Continued Use of Funding for Shelter Beds
to House Homeless from Suisun City under
the Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with Shelter Solano
March 19, 2024
General Overview
• The city has been partnering with Shelter Solano to provide two shelter beds to Suisun City homeless individuals since February of 2021. • In Fiscal Year 23/24, Suisun City entered an MOU with Shelter Solano for two shelter beds during the fiscal year for $68,400.
• Early in the fiscal year, Shelter Solano altered their business model to allow Suisun City to access a total of 730 “bed nights” in FY23/24 without capping the access to only two beds at a time.
1 2
231
General Overview
• Any overage of bed usage is $2,850 for one bed per month, to be utilized in the same manner the MOU currently provides. • At one point during FY23/24, Suisun City was assisting a total of seven people at the same time through shelter beds.
• PD staff were able to request encampments be moved approximately 251 separate times since July 1, 2024.
• This ability to offer shelter services is essential to continue conducting cleanups of homeless encampments that create refuse and other unsafe conditions in our public areas.

General Overview
Shelter Solano recently contacted City Staff to advise Suisun City had exhausted its 730 “bed nights” going into the month of March, 2024. Shelter Solano currently has five individuals receiving shelter services sponsored by Suisun City and that continuing service to these five individuals will cost the city $14,250 a month (5@$2,850 per mo.) unless there are discharges and the City does not refer services to any new individuals for the remainder of the fiscal year. 3 4
232
General Overview
While continuing this partnership with Shelter Solano through the end of FY23/24 will potentially cost the city up to $57,000 to continue securing five shelter beds, it will also allow city staff to periodically abate illegal homeless encampments. Once currently sheltered individuals are discharged and shelter beds become available, PD staff can continue to enforce the City’s camping ordinance and attempt to remove encampments in accordance with Martin v. Boise.

General Overview
Should the city terminate the partnership with Shelter Solano, PD staff will no longer be able to proactively clear illegal encampments by way of ordinance enforcement or shelter referrals. While referrals can still be made to some of the faith based shelter organizations for those willing, Shelter Solano is the only shelter in the area that offers services that are not faith based that can be accessed on a contractual basis. Other faith based shelter services in Solano County are on a first come, first serve basis that might not have availability when needed.
5 6
233
General Overview
Staff is seeking direction at this time to:

Continue sponsoring five beds at any one time, at a cost to the City of $57,000 for the remainder of this fiscal year leaving any discharges from the program open to new referrals.
◦ Continued encampment enforcement can only occur as discharges happen.

Continue sponsoring individuals receiving shelter services, while not referring any new individuals as people are discharged. A cost of up to $57,000 for the remainder of the fiscal year, but likely less due to foreseeable discharges ◦ Does not allow for the continued enforcement of encampments per Martin v. Boise.

Sever the MOU with Shelter Solano for the remainder of the fiscal year, requesting all those referred by Suisun City be discharged at the end of March, 2024. A cost of no more than $14,250 for the remainder of FY23/24. ◦ Does not allow for the continued enforcement of encampments per Martin v. Boise through the end of FY23/24. Displaces those currently working towards self sufficiency with no future plan Questions?
7 8
234

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING D
ATE: March 19, 2024

AGENDA ITE
M: Discussion and Direction Regarding the Structure of City Government.

FISCAL I
MPACT: This item has no impact on City finances.

STRATEG
IC PLAN: Ensure Good Governance.

BACKGROUND: D
uring the Suisun City Council Meeting held on January 9, 2024, the Suisun City Council requested that the City Attorney prepare a presentation describing the legal framework defining local City Government structure, particularly as it pertains to the City of Suisun City.

STAFF RE
PORT:

A. Municipal powers in California
In Cali
fornia, cities are organized as municipal corporations; they are public corporations created for public purposes. City of San Francisco v Canavan (1872) 42 Cal. 541, 558. They are the instruments of local self-government for the residents of the city they form. Once formed, a city may make and enforce within its geographical limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations that do not conflict with the general laws of the state or federal government. (Cal. Const. Art. XI, §7.) Municipa
l powers are fundamentally broad, including the rights to impose penalties to ensure the population conforms to the city’s regulations, to tax and raise revenue for public purposes, to take property through the use of eminent domain, to furnish public works, establish public utilities, and to do “everything necessarily incident to a proper discharge of its public functions.” (Ravettino v. City of San Diego (1945) 70 Cal.App. 2d 37, 44.)
A Califor
nia municipal corporation’s power is grounded in one of two alternate bodies of s tate law: 1) the general law of the S tate of California, or 2) the California Constitution. The former, referred to as “general law cities” base their power in the general laws of the state. (Irwin v. City of Manhattan Beach (1966) 65 Cal. 2d 13, 20.) The latter, known as “charter cities ”, are powered by Article IX of the State’s Constitution, which vests a city with “plenary authority over municipal affairs, free from constraints imposed by the general law.” (California Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles (1991) 54 C al.3d 1, 17.) This is know n as the “home rule” provision. T he home rule provision implic itly recognizes th e supremacy of s tate law over matter s that are of “statewide concern” while explicitly recognizing a city’s authority over its own municipal affairs. Id. at 13.

The actu
al definition of or what constitutes a “municipal affair” is not set in stone. It changes over time as societal conditions evolve . (Committee of Seven Thousand v Superior Court (1988) 45 Cal. 3d 491, 505.) Municipal powers, whether implemented via the s tate’s general law or through the state’s constitution via a locally implemented c ity charter, are also limited by the power of the f ederal government. (See Wisconsin Pub. Intervenor v. Mortier (1991) 501 U.S. 597, 604.) Agenda Item No. 15
235
The hierarchy of this legal framework works as follows. The US Constitution takes precedence over federal law, which takes precedence over s tate law, but is simultaneously limited by the principals of federalism contained in the US Constitutio n that also grants broad powers of self -governance to the states. T he State Constitution take s precedence over the s tate’s general law s. Because a charter city derives its power from the State Constitution, charter cities sidestep many, but not all, of the general laws that otherwise govern general law cities. Issues of “statewide concern” still limit local (i.e., municipal) authority, even if a city is organized by charter under the State Constitution.

1. Gen
eral law cities
Th
e general laws governing municipal affairs are found largely in California’s Government Code. (See Govt. Code §34102.) They provide a workable and familiar framework for city governments, with time-tested rules for organizing a city without the expense of drafting, vetting, and adopting by vote r approval a complex city charter. Organizing under the general laws appears to be the norm in California, especially for smaller cities like Suisun City. Based on a recent internet search, it appears that of the seven cities in Solano County, Vallejo is the only Charter City, and in 2020, of the 478 cities in California, only 125 are organized as charter cities.1
Addi
tionally, the Government Code offers certain flexibility to local governments that choose to form as general law cities. For example, general law cities may choose between having at-large elections for councilmembers or dividing the city into districts; and whether the city’s electors vote directly to elect the mayor (See Govt Code §§34900-34906) or employ the traditional method of having the seated council select the mayor from its own ranks. (See Govt Code §36801.)

2. Ch
arter cities in California
But
charter cities do have broader authority in various areas. For instance, charter cities are not bound by the California Elections Code and may set their own election rules , which includes the power to institute a system for the public financing of elections. They may also institute a “strong mayor” system where the elected mayor steps into the fulltime position of chief executive officer for the city, as opposed to hiring a city manager to oversee the city’s administration. Currently only five cities in the state rely a “strong mayor” system. They are Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland, and Fresno.2 Addi
tional potential powers of charter cities may include, among others, the ability to set council compensation; council procedures and quorum requirements ; requiring some decisions of council to require a supermajority; additional processes for municipal elections; additional rules of ethics ; how appointments are made; the processes of city contracting; the method of financing public improvements; certain taxing powers; the imposition of fines over $1,000; and zoning ordinances that are inconsistent with the general plan.

The
Government Code provides two paths for preparing a city c harter. B oth paths are time- consuming and expensive. Under the first, the city’s voters elect individual charter commissioners, who together, acting as the “c harter commission,” debate over the provisions of the c harter and eventually draft the charter document. (See Govt. Code §34452) Under the second, the city council may decide to take on the responsibility of negotiating and draft ing the charter document itself. (See Cal. Const. Art. 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_city (accessed 3/10/2024) 2 Two Mayors Seek More Authority, by Dan Walters, Cal Matters, Aug. 3, 2020 236
XI, §3). Either way, once the charter is approved by either the charter commission or the city council, it is filed with the city clerk in preparation for a vote of the electorate, either at a special election or at the next established municipal election. (See Govt Code §34462 and Elections Code §§1000 and 10403) There are further procedural details that must be satisfied in the process . For the charter to take effect requires approval by a majority of the voters. Aleshire & Wynder has provided legal support in such Charter processes before. We generally estimate that assisting in negotiations and preparing a draft charter for filing with the city clerk would likely cost around $50,000.

3. G
eneral law city organizational structures
As
mentioned above, the Government Code also provides some flexibility for general law cities.

It allows for a range of c ity council sizes , each supporting the “council -manager” form of city government. The basic structure provides that five council members (up to nine) are elected from the city at-large. The elected councilmembers then select one of the members to be the mayor and another to serve as mayor pro temp. (Govt Code §35801) In this council-manager structure, the mayor has the same power as all other councilmembers (Govt. Code §34903), e xcept for two important roles: the mayor generally sets the council agenda along with the city manager and presides over council meetings and ceremonial functions. (Govt. Code §36802) An elected mayor also makes appointments, with the approval of the council (Govt. Code §40605) and may draw a salary in addition to the salary established for other members (Govt. Code §36516.1). Once established, a council may also ask the voters to eliminate the office of elected mayor. If th e vote carries the then -elected mayor’s term ends upon expiration. (Govt.

Code §34902(b).)
The
Government Code a lso permits general law c ities to ask their voters to approve district elections, where geographical districts are drawn and approved by the voters. (Govt. Code §34871.) Under this permutation, each councilmember is elected from their own district by either: 1) the voters in that district, or 2) all the voters in the c ity. (Govt. Code §34882.) D istrict elections help to ensure that every area in the City has a voice in city government. However, district elections can also create divisions within the c ity were neighborhoods and their elected off icials seek to benefit their own districts rather than focusing on what is best for the city as a whole.

Dis
trict elections can support both options for selecting a mayor. (Govt. Code §34871) If the city has chosen to have the m ayor elected at-large, the city is divided into only four districts while the fifth seat—the mayor ’s seat— is determined during an at-large election. If instead the city council selects the mayor from its ranks, the city is divided into five districts. Once all five councilmembers are seated, then they select a mayor from the seated council.

4. C
ity of Suisun City organizational structure
Sui
sun City’s current organizational structure demonstrates yet another permutation in the general law city rubric. Since 1980 Suisun has elected all officials in at-large elections including the Mayor, all four Councilmembers, the City Clerk, and the City Treasurer. Any change to Suisun’s current structure would require a vote of the electors. If a Councilmember vacates their Office, as happened recently, the Council must appoint replacement Councilmember within 60 days. (Govt. Code 36902(a).) If the Council fails to do so, the Council must call a special election to be held at the next established election date, but only if the next election date is at least 114 days out. The same rule applies if the Mayor vacates their office. Thus, if the Mayor vacates, the Council must appoint a new Mayor within 60 days. (Govt. Code 237
§34902(a).) Again, if the Council fails to do so, the Council must call a special election to be held at the next established election date, but only if the next election date is at least 114 days out.

B. Suis
un City’s norms and procedures
In a
ddition to the Government Code provisions, a general law city may adopt and enforce ordinances governing city government so long as they do not contradict the state’s general laws (or federal law). A city may also resolve to enact “norms and procedures,” which set forth certain local organizing rules for the city council and executive city staff members.

In 2019 t
he City Council adopted an earlier version of the current “ Council Norms and Procedures.” It was last amended in February of 2022, and consists of 28 pages of detailed procedures applicable to: the administrative matters of the City ; the Council’s relationship with executive Staff; procedures for appointments to City Boards, Commissions, and Committees; council meeting procedures; agendas and the timing of agendas; the Mayor’s role ; the general conduct for public meetings ; confidentiality of closed session materials and discussions; and decorum and public relations.

The
se rules have broad implications for the day-to-day functioning of the City Council and its relationship to City Staff, future agendas, appointments, and Mayor and Councilmember roles.

The nor
ms and procedures along with the general laws of state set forth the roles of the City Council as follows:

1. Appoint
ing the City Manager & City Attorney

2. Approving the Mayor’s appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees, and Mayor Pro Temp

3. Affirming that power is centralized in the City Council

4. A llowing three members to call a closed session (in consult with the City Attorney)

5. R equesting agenda items by consensus, but Mayor or City Manager decides when to bring to Council
The
y provide for the following powers of the Mayor:

1. Es
tablishing boards, commissions and committees and making appointments

2. Appointing Mayor Pro Temp

3. C ancelling up to four regular meetings

4. Running the meetings

5. Organi zing the agenda and the agenda forecast with the City Manager

6. R earranging the agenda

7. Recognizing Councilmembers who request the floor to speak on an item

8. Imposing reasonable rules at any meeting based upon meeting circumstances

9. C alling a closed session (in consult with City Attorney) 238
They provide the following responsibilities of the City Manager:

1. Ci
ty Manager is the Chief Executive Officer

2. Following the direction of the entire Council, not individual members or the public

3. Overseeing departments heads and operations

4. Seeing to the efficient administration of the affairs of the City

5. Councilmembers are free to contact City Manager

6. Appointing, remov ing, promoting, and demoting City employees except City Attorney, City Clerk and City Treasurer

7. Directing staff, except City Attorney

8. Councilmembers may speak with department heads, but not provide direction The
y provide the following regarding the City Attorney:

1. Ci
ty Council appoints City Attorney

2. City Attorney’s client is the City Council as a whole, and the City, not individual Councilmembers

3. City Council has wide latitude in defining and controlling the City Attorney role; this is consistent with general principle that clients ordinarily define their attorney’s duties

4. Contract City Attorney is considered a “public officer” and should be sworn in The
y provide the following regarding the City Clerk:

1. Ele
cted position

2. Administers democratic processes and all legislative actions, and access to City records

3. Compliance Officer for federal, state and local statutes and ordinances The
y provide the following regarding the City Treasurer:

1. Ele
cted position

2. Responsible for the safekeeping of City moneys
Li
kely, the most accessible method for updat ing Suisun’s City governance processes is through its Council Norms and Procedures document, although fundamental changes to the City’s governance structure would require greater effort, time and funding. But perhaps a portion of what the Council may be interested in addressing could be managed by a thorough review of and update to the Council Norms and Procedures, which can be accomplished by resolution of the Council.

C. Su
isun City’s rules of order for conducting official meetings The
Norms and Procedures also state that the City shall “follow the ‘spirit’ of Rosenberg’s Rules of Order.” Rosenberg’s Rules are the standard for municipal governments throughout the state and efficiently offer an organized procedure for implementing the main tenants of otherwise complex parliamentary procedures. This simplified procedure works well for smaller bodies like local governments. “Hundreds of cities, counties, special districts, committees, boards, commissions and 239
neighborhood associations . . . have adopted Rosenberg’s Rules in lieu of Robert’s Rules because they have found them to be practical, logical, simple, easy to learn and user friendly.” (Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, revised 2011, at p2.)
Ros
enberg’s Rules rest on the following four pillars.

1. Rul
es should establish order.

2. Rules should be clear.

3. Rules should be user friendly

4. Rules should enforce the will of the majority while protecting the minority. (Id .) The
fundamental motions in this system are:

1. Ba
sic motion: This motion puts forward a decision for the body to consider.

2. Motion to amend: If a member wants to change a basic motion that is before the body, they would move to amend it.

3. Substitute motion: If a member wants to completely do away with the basic motion that is before the body and put a new motion before the body they would move a substitute motion.

4. Call the question/limit debate: If a member is done debating and wants to get on with the vote, the member may say “I move the previous question” or “I call the question.” To pass, this motion needs a 2/3 vote of the body.

5. Motion to table: If passed, this motion halts the agenda item and place it on hold.

It can either be set to come back at a specific date or meeting or held until someone at a future time moves to bring it back to the body. (Id. at pp. 3-5.) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report and provide direction to staff and the City Attorney relating, but not limited to, the drafting of policies or ordinances, and further issues to analyze.

ATT
ACHMENTS:

1. Presentation
PREPARED BY: Floy Andrews, Assistant City Attorney
REVIEWED BY: Aaron Roth, Interim City Manager
APPROVED BY: Aaron Roth, Interim City Manager
240
City Organizational
Structures
City of Suisun City
Floy Andrews
Assistant City Attorney March 19, 2024
Overview

1. Municipal Powers

2. General Law/Charter

3. Council Member Roles

4. Current Form of Representation
Elected vs. Selected Mayor
Council Members elected at-large vs. by district

5. Suisun City: Norms and Procedures

6. Charter City Powers

7. Brown Act Overview 2
241
4 Municipal Powers
POLICE
POWER
health and safety

EMINENT
DOMAIN
acquire property for
public purpose
TAXING
POWER
funding
PUBLIC
WORKS
sidewalks, sewers,
rubbish removal,
utilities
Local laws that conflict with State or Federal law are void 3 General Law Cities
Charter Cities
Power derived from State Constitution
Allows local control over matters of purely “local concern,” although remains subject to State law for matter of “statewide concern” and, of course, Federal law Allows for “Strong Mayor” structure, meaning Mayor acts as CEO of the City (only 5 Strong Mayor CA cities: Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland & Fresno) Adoption is time consuming and expensive: drafting a Charter ~$50k.

Additional costs include: 1) engaging community, 2) creating and running a Charter Commission, and 3) putting the Charter on the ballot for voter approval Vallejo appears to be the only Charter City in Solano County Power derived from State Statute (i.e. Government Code) Provides workable legal framework without the time and expense of creating and adopting a Charter
Allows for substantial customization by local ordinance Updating “norms and procedures” provides substantial ability to “customize” the rules as applied in Suisun City 44
242
Mayor
Mayor is a councilmember
with the same powers and
responsibilities plus:
presides at council
meetings
set agendas in connection
with City Manager
may collect extra salary, if
approved by ordinance or
electors
makes appointments with
council approval
establishes boards,
commissions, committees,
with consent of council
signs contracts (ministerial)
Councilmembers
Councilmembers comprise
the legislative body
Trustees of the public
welfare
Also members of the
public/know which “hat
you are wearing”
You cannot act in both
capacities at the same
time, even if you would
act the same
Elected and Appointed
Councilmembers have
identical rights and
privileges
Mayor Pro Temp
Usually selected by Council,
although Suisun’s norms and
procedures state MPT is
appointed by the Mayor with
Council consent.

In the Mayor’s absence,
Mayor Pro Tem must
exercise certain powers
granted to the Mayor
Represents the Mayor
when unavailable
General Law Cities: Councilmember Roles
5 Suisun City
Mayor elected at-large
Four Councilmembers
elected at-large
Clerk elected at-large
Treasurer elected at-large
Term limit - 4 terms
Council-Manager
Five Council Members
elected at-large
Council elects one of its
members to be Mayor
Council elects one of its
members to be Mayor
Pro Temp
Mayor has equal powers
as other Council
Members, except in
setting agendas and
presiding over meetings
and ceremonial functions
City Manager hires all
staff except the City
Attorney
Mayor elected at-large
Council Members
elected by (or from)
established districts
(four, six, or eight)
Mayor selected by council
Council Members elected
by (or from) established
districts (five, seven or
nine districts)
General Law Cities: Forms of Representation
6 District Elections (2 variations)
243
Suisun City
Four Councilmembers
elected at-large
Mayor elected at-large
Clerk elected at-large
Treasurer elected at-large
Term limit - 4 terms
General Law Cities: Elected Mayor
7 Current Structure Changing the Structure
Structure established in 1980 by general
vote (2-year term). Term extended in 1990
to 4-year term, also by a vote of the
electorate,
Change requires a general vote of
electors. If eliminated, the current
Mayor serves out the current term.

Vote of Electors Required
Succession plan if Office of Mayor is vacated?
The Council must appoint a new Mayor within 60 days. If it fails to do so, the Council must call a special election to be held at the next established election date (but not within less than 114 days).

Suisun City
Four Councilmembers
elected at-large
Mayor elected at-large
Clerk elected at-large
Treasurer elected at-large
Term limit - 4 terms
General Law Cities: District Representation
8 Current Structure Changing the Structure
Term extended to 4-year term by
electors.

Change requires a general vote of
electors. If eliminated, the current
Councilmembers serve out their
current term.

Vote of Electors Required
The Council must appoint a new Council Member within 60 days. If it fails to do so, the Council must call a special election to be held at the next established election date (but not within less than 114 days).

Succession plan if Office of a Council Member is vacated? 244
Suisun City: Norms and Procedures (2022 update)
9 City Council
Appoints City Manager & City Attorney
Approves Mayor’s appointments to:

Boards, Commissions and Committees
Mayor Pro Temp (1 year term)
Power centralized in the City Council
Three members may call a closed
session (in consult with City Attorney)
May request agenda item by consensus,
but Mayor or City Manager decides
when to bring it to Council
Mayor
Establishes boards, commissions and
committees and makes appointments
Appoints Mayor Pro Temp
Option to cancel up to four regular meetings
Runs the meetings
Organizes the agenda and the agenda forecast
May rearrange the agenda
Recognizes Councilmembers who request floor
May impose reasonable rules at any meeting
based upon meeting circumstances
May call a closed session in consult with
City Attorney
City Council - Five Members
City Manager
City’s Chief Executive Officer
Follows direction of entire Council, not individual members or the public Oversees department heads and operations
Responsible for efficient administration of the affairs of the City Appoints, removes, promotes, and demotes City employees except: City Attorney, City Clerk and City Treasurer, and prior Council approval is required for department heads
Councilmembers are free to contact City Manager re City business City Manager directs all staff, except City Attorney
Councilmembers may speak with department head, but not provide direction to them
Suisun City: Norms and Procedures (2022 update)
10 245
11 Suisun City: Norms and Procedures (2022 update)
Other City Officers
City Attorney
City Council appoints City Attorney
City Attorney’s client is the City Council as a whole, and the City City Council has wide latitude in defining and controlling the City Attorney role; this is consistent with general principle that client ordinarily defines their attorney’s duties Contract City Attorney is considered a “public officer” and should be sworn in City Clerk
City Treasurer
Administers democratic processes and all legislative actions, and access City records Compliance Officer for federal, state and local statutes and ordinances May be appointed or elected
Elected position
Responsible for the safekeeping of City moneys
May be appointed or elected
12 Rosenberg’s Rules & Suisun’s Norms and Procedures
Four Pillars
Rules should establish order1.

Rules should be clear2.

Rules should be user friendly3.

Rules should enforce the will
of the majority while protecting
the minority

4. “The Council shall follow the ’spirit’ of Rosenberg’s Rules of Order” Alterations to Rosenberg’s Rules from Norms and Procedures A motion is not required prior to general discussion
A motion may be amended by the maker with the consent of the “seconder,” a vote is not required
Mayor has discretion to impose reasonable rules based on circumstances Fundamental Motions
Basic motion1.

Motion to amend2.

Substitute motion3.

Call the question/limit debate4.

Motion to table5.
246
New City Charter might alter the following:
13 Composition of the City Council
Council compensation
Council procedures and quorum requirements
Some votes might require a supermajority
Municipal elections
Rules of ethics
How appointments are made
Process/method of contracting
Method of financing public improvments
Certain taxing power provisions
Imposition of fines over $1000
Zoning ordinances that are inconsistent with the General Plan 247

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
248

SUISUN CITY MAYOR INFORMATIONAL REPORT
MARCH 19, 2024
REGIONAL BOARDS / COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES:

Solano Transportation Authority Board Member (STA)
Solano County Water Agency Board Member (SCWA)
 Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA)
SolTrans Board of Directors
 Local Agency Formation Commissioner (Alternate) (LAFCO)  CAP2 Solano JPA (Solano Regional Homelessness Board)
Solano Economic Development Center Board Member
Napa-Solano Area Agency on Aging
Solano County Mayor’s Committee
City-County Coordinating Committee
Suisun City Committees / Ad-Hoc:
 Suisun-Solano Water Authority Executive Committee
Suisun-Solano Water Authority Board
Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District Executive Committee
 Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District Board
 Suisun City Environment and Climate Committee Chair
30 Acre Parcel Highway 12 and Marina Mixed Use Ad-Hoc Committee City Manager Evaluation 2024 Ad-Hoc Committee
Other:
 California Association of Sanitation Agencies Winter Policy Conference __________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 3 ends

C
apitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority Board (CCJPA)
(February 21, 2024 / Appointed by STA Board of Directors) Items of Note:
• Attended the CCJPA Board Meeting
• Reviewed and discussed the New Carquinez Crossing Study o Challenges: Bridge “lifts” for marine traffic at Benicia are the 2nd largest source of delay for CCJPA trains. Each lift causes about 20 minutes delay and trains are forced “out of slot”. o Study Goal: Identify and develop conceptual options for high-level rail bridge that does not need to lift for marine traffic.
o Study helped identify the most feasible option. The concept allows for (2) freight tracks + (2) passenger tracks, improvements will increase speed and reduce travel time. This is just the beginning phase. This will benefit local commuters. • Link to Board Agenda>> https://www.capitolcorridor.org/wp- content/uploads/2024/02/Agenda-Materials-Slide-Presentation-for-Feb-21-2024-CCJPA-Board- Meeting_Final.pdf
249
SUISUN CITY INFORMATIONAL REPORT, Page 2 of 3
CAP2 Solano JPA Board Meeting (Solano Regional Homelessness Board) (February 22, 2024 / Committee Member)
Items of Note:
• Attended the CapSolano JPA Board Meeting
• T
he board approved the Solano Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention (HHAP) Round 5 application and use of funding.
o The process to identify the recommended action and allocations included four community listening sessions, interviews focused on discharge planning to reduce exits to homelessness, and feedback sessions.
o An Ad Hoc HHAP-5 Committee reviewed input from CAP Solano JPA, Tripartite Advisory Board, Housing First Solano CoC, and Solano County representatives on:
 Proposed actions to improve homelessness response system performance measures;
 Actions to ensure racial and gender equity;
 HHAP-5 funding plans
o The approved allocation of $1,725, 588 HFS CoC/CAP Solano JPA HHAP-5 Allocations are as follows:
 $707,491: Prevention and Diversion
 $707,491: Services Coordination
 $172,559: Youth Rapid Rehousing
 $17,256: HMIS
 $120,791: Admin
• Link to HHAP Presentation>> https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1Capw- 6phT6v5ZQRwHWEVXfOt88lrcht_
• Also in attendance: Councilmember Dawson
C
alifornia Association of Sanitation Agencies Winter Policy Conference (February 26-27, 2024 / Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District Board Member) Items of Note:
• Attended the CASA Winter Policy Conference
• Heard from Congressional Panel on policy issues that will dominate the coming months of legislative activity ranging from PFAS mandates to Water Resources Development Act • Heard Water Sector Stakeholder Panel: Leaders of National Water Sector Organizations who reviewed their respective legislative and regulatory agendas and what they consider the policymaking imperatives for the water sector as congress wades into these issues in 2024. • Heard panels regarding innovative financing and cyber security. • Heard panel from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency where senior USEPA officials discussed the agency’s regulatory agenda and its impacts upon clean water agencies that are facing growing regulatory compliance demands on their operations.
• Met with Congressman Garamendi’s legislative staff.
• Also in attendance: Vice Mayor Washington
250
SUISUN CITY INFORMATIONAL REPORT, Page 3 of 3
Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District Board Meeting
(February 26, 2024 / Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District Board Member) Items of Note:
• This meeting was Cancelled due to CASA Winter Policy Conference Su
isun City Environment and Climate Committee Meeting
(February 28, 2024 / Committee Chair)
Items of Note:
• Attended the Suisun City Environment and Climate Committee Meeting • Alex Lunine from Sustainable Solano was a guest speaker and provided the committee with an overview of the Suisun City Community Resilience Building Workshop Summary of Findings that was published by The Nature Conservancy in June of 2022. These findings provide the climate committee with a roadmap of actions they can take to support Suisun City’s ability to mitigate a variety of climate challenges such as sea level rise, wildfires, and earthquakes. • The committee formally voted for Karina Cook to lead this year’s Earth Day Art Walk. • The committee approved the use of Zencity Engage as a platform to post educational material on environment and sustainability with the Suisun City community-at-large.

S
uisun-Solano Water Authority Executive Committee Meeting (March 4, 2024 / President of SSWA Board)
Items of Note:
• Attended the SSWA Executive Committee Meeting
• Approved the upcoming agenda for the general board meeting. • Identified items that needed additional clarity for upcoming board meeting.

Lo
cal Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) Board Meeting
(March 6, 2024 / Appointed by Solano County Mayors Committee as an Alternate) Items of Note:
• Attended the LAFCO Board Meeting
• The board discussed the process of appointing a new LAFCO Alternate Public Member. o Applications from members of the public have been received. o The board will appoint at the next board meeting and interviews will take place in public. o There were a total of (6) applicants but only (4) met the requirements needed to serve on the LAFCO board.
• The board approved the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Mid-Year Report and an updated status of current work plan.
• There were no updates for the executive director to the board regarding Suisun City except to note that comments had been provided to the Environmental Impact Report during public comment period regarding the Suisun Logistics Center towards Cordelia Rd. 251

Suisun City City CouncilMarch 19, 2024

Suisun City City Council
March 19, 2024