Cities Index.
Presentation to Council RTC No 25-0246 - 20250930

Sunnyvale City Council
September 30, 2025

Document
Presentation to Council RTC No 25-0246 - 20250930
Meeting
September 30, 2025
Body
Sunnyvale City Council
Original file
445 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Study Issue OCM 20-01— Service Worker Retention Ordinance Connie Verceles, Deputy City Manager
September 30, 2025
2City of Sunnyvale – Topic/Abbreviated Title – Month Year Background
2020
Request
from Unite
Here Local
19 2020
Ranked top
study issue
2020–2023
Delayed by
pandemic
2024
Research
resumed
2025
Outreach +
analysis
3City of Sunnyvale – Topic/Abbreviated Title – Month Year What is a Retention Ordinance?
Requires successor
contractors to
retain existing
employees for 90
days
Benefits: worker
stability, service
continuity,
institutional
knowledge
Typically
adopted in large
cities with
convention
centers/event
facilities
4City of Sunnyvale – Topic/Abbreviated Title – Month Year Santa Clara Ordinance
Applies to Employers with 25+
employees, entertainment
venues, & Contracts ≥ $25,000
Key rules: 90-day retention, no
dismissal without cause, layoffs by
seniority, satisfactory employees
offered permanent jobs, &
waivers via collective bargaining
5City of Sunnyvale – Topic/Abbreviated Title – Month Year Stakeholder Feedback
Businesses
Already practice employee retention voluntarily
Cost-effective to keep trained staff
Concerns: underperforming workers, federal contractor conflicts, lack of enforcement Unite Here Local 19
Supports Santa Clara–style ordinance
Ordinance will provide meaningful worker protections
Stated other cities have similar ordinance; no examples provided 6City of Sunnyvale – Topic/Abbreviated Title – Month Year Analysis
Sunnyvale lacks
convention centers/large
event facilities
Retention already
required in some City
contracts (Solid Waste)
Existing protections:

Minimum Wage,
Wage Theft Policy,
Local Hire rules
No mechanism to
monitor/enforce
private contractor
changes
Risk: confusion +
lawsuits without
measurable
benefits
7City of Sunnyvale – Topic/Abbreviated Title – Month Year Recommendation
Do not adopt Service Worker Retention Ordinance; close Study Issue OCM 20- 01  Sunnyvale lacks facilities where ordinance is relevant  Businesses already retain workers voluntarily
 No practical enforcement mechanism

← All documents from this meeting