Tehachapi City Council
January 17, 2023

TEHACHAPI POLICE DEPARTMENT

COMMUNITY ROOM
220 WEST C STREET
AGENDA

TEHACHAPI CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING, AND

TEHACHAPI CITY FINANCING CORPORATION REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2023 - 6:00 P.M.

Persons desiring disability-related accommodations should contact the City Clerk prior to the meeting for the accommodation. A copy of any writing that is a public record relating to an open session of this meeting is available at City Hall, 115 South Robinson Street, Tehachapi, California.

Pursuant to G.C. Section 54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with the meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 115 S. Robinson Street, Tehachapi, CA. Any items distributed to the City Council after posting of the Agenda Packet will be available for inspection at the Office of the City Clerk at City Hall. If you would like additional information on any item appearing on this agenda, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (661) 822-2200.

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

INVOCATION
Participation in the invocation is strictly voluntary. Each City Councilmember, city employee, and each person in attendance may participate or not participate as he or she chooses.

PLEDGE TO FLAG

CONSENT AGENDA/OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by city staff. Consent items will be considered first and may be approved by one motion if no member of the council or audience wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent agenda and will be considered in listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the city council concerning the item before action is taken. Staff recommendations are shown in caps.

AUDIENCE ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
The City Council welcomes public comments on any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council. We respectfully request that this public forum be utilized in a positive and constructive manner.

Persons addressing the Council should first state their name and area of residence, the matter of City business to be discussed, and the organization or persons represented, if any. To ensure accuracy in the minutes, please fill out a speaker’s card at the podium. Comments directed to an item on the agenda should be made at the time the item is called for discussion by the Mayor. Questions on non-agenda items directed to the Council or staff should be first submitted to the City Clerk in written form no later than 12:00 p.m.

TEHACHAPI CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING, AND

TEHACHAPI CITY FINANCING CORPORATION REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2023 - 6:00 P.M. - PG. 2
on the Monday preceding the Council meeting; otherwise response to the question may be carried over to the next City Council meeting. No action can be taken by the Council on matters not listed on the agenda except in certain specified circumstances. The Council reserves the right to limit the speaking time of individual speakers and the time allotted for public presentations.

1. Public comment

CITY CLERK REPORTS

ALL ORDINANCES SCHEDULED FOR INTRODUCTION OR ADOPTION AT THIS MEETING SHALL BE READ

BY TITLE ONLY
Tehachapi City Council Unassigned Res. No. 01-23
Tehachapi City Council Unassigned Ord. No. 23-01-773
Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency Unassigned Res. No. 01-23 Tehachapi Public Financing Authority Unassigned Res. No. 01-23 * 2. Minutes for the Tehachapi City Council, Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency, Tehachapi Public Financing Authority, and the Tehachapi City Financing Corporation regular meeting held on December 19, 2022 – APPROVE AND FILE

3. The City Council will appoint one member to the Tehachapi Valley Recreation and Parks District Board to fill the vacancy created by Board Member Sandy Chavez expiration of term. This appointment will fill a four-year term, which is to expire on February 2, 2027. The City Clerk’s office received an application from Sandy Chavez – APPOINT ONE MEMBER TO THE TEHACHAPI VALLEY RECREATION AND PARKS DISTRICT BOARD TO COMPLETE A TERM TO EXPIRE ON FEBRUARY 2, 2027

FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORTS
* 4. Disbursements and bills for December 15, 2022 through January 9, 2023 - AUTHORIZE PAYMENTS * 5. City of Tehachapi Investment Report through December 2022 – RECEIVE REPORT * 6. Resolution of the Board of Directors to the Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency (RDA):

Approve a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the fiscal period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 – ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.

SA 01-23 APPROVING THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 (“ROPS 23-24”)

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORTS

7. PUBLIC HEARING – Tehachapi Red Apple Tract addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment 2022-01, Pre-Zone of subject property to C-3, and Annexation No. 86 – OPEN HEARING; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND CORRESPONDENCE; STAFF REPORT; RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT; CLOSE HEARING; STAFF RECOMMENDATION; ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-01 AND FINDING THAT NONE OF THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT SECTION 15162 CALLING

FOR A SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAVE

TEHACHAPI CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING, AND

TEHACHAPI CITY FINANCING CORPORATION REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2023 - 6:00 P.M. - PG. 3
OCCURRED SUCH THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS NECESSARY; INTRODUCE, BY TITLE

ONLY, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AMENDING THE CITY OF

TEHACHAPI ZONING CODE TO PREZONE THE PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI

SPHERE OF INFLUENCE

8. Second reading and adoption of an ordinance adopting Ordinance No. G-9179 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kern concerning building regulations adopting the 2022 State of California Building Standards Codes – ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. G-9179 OF THE

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTERS

17.04, 17.06, 17.08, 17.10, 17.12, 17.16, 17.20, 17.24, 17.26, 17.28, 17.32, 17.34, 17.36, 17.40, 17.44,

17.48, AND 17.56 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF KERN CONCERNING BUILDING REGULATIONS – GENERAL, RESIDENTIAL CODE, BUILDING CODE, GREEN BUILDING

STANDARDS CODE, MECHANICAL CODE, HOUSING CODE, PLUMBING CODE, ELECTRICAL CODE,

EXISTING BUILDING CODE, GRADING CODE (AS REVISED HEREINAFTER), FIRE CODE, WILDLAND

URBAN INTERFACE CODE, DANGEROUS BUILDINGS CODE, BUILDING RELOCATION, MOBILE HOME

AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT CODE, AND ENERGY CODE AND AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 753 OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AND TEHACHAPI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.04.160
* 9. Tentative Tract Map 6714 Entitlement Extension – APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM SATICOY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC TO EXTEND THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6714 PROJECT ENTITLEMENT FOR SIX MONTHS UNTIL JULY 17, 2023

10. Development Department User Fees update 2023 – ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

ADJUSTING, EXTENDING, AND ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND BUILDING

SERVICES

CITY MANAGER REPORTS

11. Report to Council regarding current activities and programs – VERBAL REPORT

COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
On their own initiative, a Councilmember may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information, take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda, request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter, or make a brief report on his or her own activities. (Per Gov’t. Code §54954.2(a)) If an item is listed below the Council has the option to take action or refer the matter to staff for a later agenda.

CLOSED SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: Water Rights
Agency Negotiating Party: City Manager and Public Works Director Negotiating Party: Comprehend and Copy Nature, LLC
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment

TEHACHAPI CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING, AND

TEHACHAPI CITY FINANCING CORPORATION REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2023 - 6:00 P.M. - PG. 4

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9
Name of Case: Tehachapi-Cummings County Water District v. City of Tehachapi, et. al.

ADJOURNMENT

TEHACHAPI POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY ROOM
220 WEST C STREET

MINUTES

TEHACHAPI CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY REGULAR MEETING,

TEHACHAPI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING, AND

TEHACHAPI CITY FINANCING CORPORATION REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2022 – 6:00 P.M.

NOTE: Wi, Sm, Da, and Po are abbreviations for Council Members Wiggins, Smith, Davies, and Pogon-Cord, respectively. For example, Wi/Sm denotes Council Member Wiggins made the motion and Council Member Smith seconded it. The abbreviation Ab means absent, Abd abstained, Ns noes, and NAT no action taken.

ACTION TAKEN

CALL TO ORDER
Meeting called to order by Mayor Smith at 6:00 pm

ROLL CALL
Roll call by City Clerk Tori Marsh

Present: Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Davies, Councilmember Pogon-Cord, and Councilmember Wiggins

Absent: One (1) Vacancy

INVOCATION
Led by Pastor Mike Safford, Tehachapi Vineyard Church

PLEDGE TO THE FLAG
Led by Councilmember Wiggins

ELECTION

1. A Resolution declaring the result of the General Municipal Election held November 8, 2022 – ELECTIONS OFFICIAL ASHLEY WHITMORE GAVE STAFF REPORT; ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 55-22 RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022, DECLARING THE

RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW
Adopted Resolution No. 55-22
Reciting The Fact Of The General
Municipal Election Held On
November 8, 2022, Declaring The
Result And Such Other Matters
As Provided By Law
Wi/Po Ayes All

2. Swearing in of new officers and presentation of Certificates of Election per Resolution No. 48-22 which provides for the appointment to the offices of the City that were to be elected on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 – PRESENTATION Tehachapi City Council Regular Meeting – December 5, 2022 Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Tehachapi Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting And Tehachapi City Financing Corporation Regular Meeting ACTION TAKEN

3. According to Tehachapi Municipal Code Section 2.08.040, the presiding officer of the council shall be the Mayor, who shall be elected by the Council Members, from among their membership except that the outgoing Mayor may not succeed himself or herself - ELECTION OF MAYOR FOR A TWO-YEAR TERM

COUNCILMEMBER WIGGINS NOMINATED COUNCILMEMBER DAVIES FOR MAYOR
Elected Councilmember Davies
To Two-Year Mayor Position
Ayes All
Intermission to seat new Mayor

4. Election of Mayor Pro-tempore – ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE FOR A

TWO-YEAR TERM

COUNCILMEMBER SMITH NOMINATED COUNCILMEMBER POGON-CORD FOR

MAYOR PRO TEM
Elected Pogon-Cord To Two-Year
Mayor Pro Tem Position
Ayes All

5. City of Tehachapi Local Transactions and Use Tax – FINANCE DIRECTOR HAMED JONES GAVE STAFF REPORT; ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 56-22 OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE

AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE

ADMINISTRATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A LOCAL TRANSACTIONS AND

USE TAX
Adopted Resolution No. 56-22 Of
The City Council Of The City Of
Tehachapi Authorizing The
Mayor To Execute Agreements
With The California Department
Of Tax And Fee Administration
For Implementation Of A Local
Transactions And Use Tax
Sm/Po Ayes All

6. Authorization of certain designated employees to examine Local Transactions and Use Tax records per California Revenue and Tax Code 7056 and 7056.5 – FINANCE DIRECTOR HAMED JONES GAVE STAFF REPORT; ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 57-22 AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES OR

TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAXES RECORDS
Adopt Resolution No. 57-22
Authorizing Examination Of Sales
Or Transactions And Use Taxes
Records
Sm/Wi Ayes All

7. HDL Companies agreements for Transactions, Tax Audit Services, Economic Analysis/Forecasting, and related services – FINANCE DIRECTOR HAMED JONES GAVE STAFF REPORT; APPROVED THE MASTER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN HDL

COMPANIES AND THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AND AUTHORIZED THE MAYOR TO SIGN
Approved The Master
Agreements Between Hdl
Companies And The City Of
Tehachapi And Authorized The
Mayor To Sign
Sm/Wi Ayes All
CONSENT AGENDA Approved
Wi/Po Ayes All

AUDIENCE ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

8. Presentation of Certificate of Acknowledgement by Shannon Grove’s representative to the City of Tehachapi Finance Department for their recent Government Finance Officers Award.

9. Public comment
Tehachapi City Council Regular Meeting – December 5, 2022 Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Tehachapi Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting And Tehachapi City Financing Corporation Regular Meeting ACTION TAKEN

CITY CLERK REPORTS
* 10. Minutes for the Tehachapi City Council, Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency, Tehachapi Public Financing Authority, and the Tehachapi City Financing Corporation regular meeting held on December 5, 2022 – APPROVED AND FILED Approved And Filed
Wi/Po Ayes All
* 11. Disposition of Property – ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 58-22 AUTHORIZING THE

DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY
Adopted Resolution No. 58-22
Authorizing The Disposition Of
City Owned Property
Wi/Po Ayes All

12. City Council Vacancy – GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR ASHLEY WHITMORE GAVE STAFF REPORT; DIRECTED STAFF TO PUBLISH A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO FILL A

VACANCY FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL BY APPOINTMENT
Directed Staff To Publish A
Notice Of Intention To Fill A
Vacancy For Member Of The City
Council By Appointment
Po/Sm Ayes All

FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORTS
* 13. Disbursements and bills for November 30, 2022 through December 14, 2022 -

AUTHORIZED PAYMENTS
Authorized Payments
Da/Po Ayes All

14. Disbursements and bills for RSI Petroleum for November 30, 2022 through December 14, 2022 – AUTHORIZED PAYMENTS
Councilmember Davies Recused
Himself Due To A Potential
Conflict Of Interest. He Is An
Employee Of RSI Petroleum.

Authorized Payments
Sc/Po Motion Carried
Abd Da

15. City of Tehachapi Investment Report through November 2022 – RECEIVED REPORT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORTS

16. PUBLIC HEARING – Community Facilities District No. 2017-01 Annexation No. 2 – OPENED HEARING AT 6:24 PM; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WAS PUBLISHED IN THE TEHACHAPI NEWS ON DECEMBER 5, 2022 AND NO CORRESPONDENCE WAS RECEIVED; DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR JAY SCHLOSSER GAVE STAFF REPORT; NO PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED; CLOSED HEARING AT 6:29 PM; STAFF RECOMMENDATION; ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 59-22 ANNEXING OF TERRITORY (TRACT MAP NO. 7366) TO A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT,

AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX, AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF TAX TO

QUALIFIED ELECTORS, CITY OF TEHACHAPI COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2017-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 2 ; AND RESOLUTION NO. 60- 22 DECLARING RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION, DETERMINING

VALIDITY OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF AMENDED

NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN, CITY OF TEHACHAPI COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2017-01 (PUBLIC SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 2 Adopted Resolution No. 59-22
Annexing Of Territory (Tract Map
No. 7366) To A Community
Facilities District, Authorizing The
Levy Of A Special Tax, And
Submitting Levy Of Tax To
Qualified Electors, City Of
Tehachapi Community Facilities
District No. 2017-1 (Public
Services) Annexation No. 2 ; And
Resolution No. 60-22 Declaring
Results Of A Special Annexation
Election, Determining Validity Of
Prior Proceedings, And Directing
Recording Of Amended Notice Of
Special Tax Lien, City Of
Tehachapi Community Facilities
District No. 2017-01 (Public
Services) Annexation No. 2
Sm/Da Ayes All

17. Adoption of an Urgency Ordinance adopting Ordinance No. G-9179 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kern concerning building regulations – DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR JAY SCHLOSSER GAVE STAFF REPORT; Adopted Urgency Ordinance No.
22-07-772 Adopting Ordinance
No. G-9179 Of The Board Of
Supervisors Of The County Of
Tehachapi City Council Regular Meeting – December 5, 2022 Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Tehachapi Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting And Tehachapi City Financing Corporation Regular Meeting ACTION TAKEN ADOPTED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 22-07-772 ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO.

G-9179 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.04, 17.06, 17.08, 17.10, 17.12, 17.16,

17.20, 17.24, 17.26, 17.28, 17.32, 17.34, 17.40, 17.44, 17.48, AND 17.56 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF KERN CONCERNING BUILDING REGULATIONS – GENERAL, RESIDENTIAL CODE, BUILDING CODE,

GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, MECHANICAL CODE, HOUSING CODE,

PLUMBING CODE, ELECTRICAL CODE, EXISTING BUILDING CODE, GRADING

CODE (AS REVISED HEREINAFTER), FIRE CODE, WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE

CODE, DANGEROUS BUILDINGS CODE, BUILDING RELOCATION, MOBILE HOME

AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT CODE, AND ENERGY CODE AND AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 753 OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AND TEHACHAPI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.04.160 Kern, State Of California
Amending Chapters 17.04, 17.06,

17.08, 17.10, 17.12, 17.16, 17.20,

17.24, 17.26, 17.28, 17.32, 17.34,

17.40, 17.44, 17.48, And 17.56 Of
Title 17 Of The Ordinance Code
Of The County Of Kern
Concerning Building Regulations
– General, Residential Code,
Building Code, Green Building
Standards Code, Mechanical
Code, Housing Code, Plumbing
Code, Electrical Code, Existing
Building Code, Grading Code (As
Revised Hereinafter), Fire Code,
Wildland Urban Interface Code,
Dangerous Buildings Code,
Building Relocation, Mobile
Home And Accessory Structures,
Flood Plain Management Code,
And Energy Code And Amending
Section 1 Of Ordinance No. 753
Of The City Of Tehachapi And
Tehachapi Municipal Code
Section 15.04.160
Sm/Po Ayes All

18. Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance adopting Ordinance No. G-9179 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kern concerning building regulations – DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR JAY SCHLOSSER GAVE STAFF REPORT; APPROVED THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. G-9179 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.04, 17.06, 17.08, 17.10,

17.12, 17.16, 17.20, 17.24, 17.26, 17.28, 17.32, 17.34, 17.40, 17.44, 17.48,

17.56, AND 17.56 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF KERN CONCERNING BUILDING REGULATIONS – GENERAL, RESIDENTIAL CODE,

BUILDING CODE, GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, MECHANICAL CODE,

HOUSING CODE, PLUMBING CODE, ELECTRICAL CODE, EXISTING BUILDING

CODE, GRADING CODE (AS REVISED HEREINAFTER), FIRE CODE, WILDLAND

URBAN INTERFACE CODE, DANGEROUS BUILDINGS CODE, BUILDING

RELOCATION, MOBILE HOME AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT CODE, AND ENERGY CODE AND AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 753 OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AND TEHACHAPI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.04.160
Approved The First Reading Of
An Ordinance Adopting
Ordinance No. G-9179 Of The
Board Of Supervisors Of The
County Of Kern, State Of
California Amending Chapters

17.04, 17.06, 17.08, 17.10, 17.12,

17.16, 17.20, 17.24, 17.26, 17.28,

17.32, 17.34, 17.40, 17.44, 17.48,

17.56, And 17.56 Of Title 17 Of
The Ordinance Code Of The
County Of Kern Concerning
Building Regulations – General,
Residential Code, Building Code,
Green Building Standards Code,
Mechanical Code, Housing Code,
Plumbing Code, Electrical Code,
Existing Building Code, Grading
Code (As Revised Hereinafter),
Fire Code, Wildland Urban
Interface Code, Dangerous
Buildings Code, Building
Relocation, Mobile Home And
Accessory Structures, Flood Plain
Management Code, And Energy
Code And Amending Section 1 Of
Ordinance No. 753 Of The City Of
Tehachapi And Tehachapi
Municipal Code Section

15.04.160
Sm/Wi Ayes All

POLICE CHIEF REPORTS
* 19. Emergency abatement at 49518 Michael Avenue – APPROVED EMERGENCY ABATEMENT ACTIONS CONDUCTED BY CODE ENFORCEMENT AT 49518

MICHAEL AVENUE
Approved Emergency Abatement
Actions Conducted By Code
Enforcement At 49518 Michael
Avenue
Wi/Po Ayes All
Tehachapi City Council Regular Meeting – December 5, 2022 Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Tehachapi Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting And Tehachapi City Financing Corporation Regular Meeting ACTION TAKEN

ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER REPORTS

20. Indemnity agreements with the County of Kern for updates to the Emergency Operations Plans and Kern OP Area Cybersecurity Project – ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER COREY COSTELLOE GAVE STAFF REPORT; APPROVED THE

INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AND THE

COUNTY OF KERN AND AUTHORIZED THE MAYOR TO SIGN
Approved The Indemnity
Agreements Between The City Of
Tehachapi And The County Of
Kern And Authorized The Mayor
To Sign
Sm/Wi Ayes All

CITY MANAGER REPORTS

21. Report to Council regarding current activities and programs – VERBAL REPORT

COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS

CLOSED SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9
Name of Case: Tehachapi-Cummings County Water District v. City of Tehachapi, et. al.

No Reportable Action

ADJOURNMENT
The City Council/Boards adjourned at 6:49 p.m. to a City Council, Tehachapi Redevelopment Successor Agency, Tehachapi Public Financing Authority and Tehachapi City Financing Corporation Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 6:00 pm.

Adjourned At 6:49 pm
__________________________________

TORI MARSH, CMC
City Clerk, City of Tehachapi, California
Approved this 17th day
Of January 2023.
___________________________
MICHAEL DAVIES, Mayor
City of Tehachapi, California

C ITY O F

TE HACHAPI
CALIFORIT$A

COUNCIL REPORTS
MEETING DATE: JANUARY 77,2023 AGENDA SECTION: CITY CLERK

APPROVED

DEPARTMENT H
CITY

TO HONORABLE MAYOR DAVIES AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ASHLEY WHITMORE, GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR
DATE: JANUARY LO,2023
SUBJECT: TEHACHAPIVALLEY RECREATION AND PARKS DISTRICT BOARD APPOINTMENT

BACKGROUND
The Tehachapi City Council will appoint one member to the Tehachapi Valley Recreation and Parks District Board (TVRPD) to fill the vacancy created by Board Member Chavez's expiration of term. This appointment will fill a four-year term which is set to expire on February 2,2027 . All applicants must be residents of the City of Tehachapi.

The City Clerk's office received one application from Sandy Chavez.

RECOMMENDATION

APPOTNT ONE MEMBER TO THE TEHACHAPI VATLEY RECREATION AND PARKS DISTRICT BOARD TO COMPLETE A TERM TO EXPIRE ON FEBRUARY 2,2027
(661) 822-22OO
Fax: (661) 822-8559 TEHACHAPI 115 South Robinson Street Tehachapi, CA 93561-1722
www.tehachapicityha I l.com
::LBLVED
.#:,1:fl1"*

CALIFORNIA
Live Up.

APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
APPLICANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT EACH COUNCIL MEMBER TO COMMUNICATE THEIR INTEREST FOR APPOINTMENT.

Submit Application To: City CIerk's Office
1 15 South Robinson Street
Tehachapi, CA 93561
Name
Address
S
City State tn
Phone Number lotol-311- 9fZn Fax Number
I ves
l- ruo
OFFICE USE ONtY
City Resident:

Email
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)
0 2.

3. 4.

Occupation Itnter tnrrl-or
Business Name
Address
City State Lfi
phoneNumber B)3- qOOS Fax Number
Education - List schools attended and/or graduated, as well as degree(s):

I St hool
0? I fl F 0n
(- H rqh
EJucolr

,aI
Zipcode q3Cal
1 Zipcode 13\bl
Other special training or experience:
rr,?,ffi i,.T^ {' J;$'fi fr 'ilfr
ru,3,iHlHfi:,,ff '
u rr B s
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. lndicate when, position, and duties:

V R?D $sord lqerrrloer 2Dtq - ? fesofif
Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Tehachapi:
mt\/
3or
8trffi-trtffi.s$w1 ssl0n
D lffi is
\N 0\)I
tTBg
0rn
tlde
Do you have any interests or associations that might present a conflict of interest? yes f lf yes, please explain below. No Please attach your resume and any additional information or statements that you feel would be helpful in reviewing your qualifications

AUTHORIZATION AND RELEASE
I understand that in connection with this application for appointment, the information contained herein will be made available to the general public upon request.

Signature Field 4, J O,r1/\ Date/rimeFierd ,lll^=
This document is a public record and may be disclosed/released pursuant to the California Public Records Act
NOTE:

Accounts Payable
Checks by Date - Detail by Vendor Number
ciTY 0i
Userl
Printed:
afiescas
l/9/2023 8125 AM
Check No vendor No
lnvoice No
Vendor Name
Description

TEHACHAPI

CALIFORNIA
Check D.te
Reference
Check Amoult
ACH 0017
656946
656946-A
656946-B
006r
AF33532
AF33533
AF338l7
AF33879
AF34l l2
ACH 0t0l
RMA2023-00189
RMA2023-00 I 89-A
RMA2023-00189-B
RMA2023-00189-C
RMA2023-00189-D
RMA2023-00189-E
RMA2023-00189-F
RMA2023-00189-G
RMA2023-00189-H
RMA2023-00189-I
RMA2023-00r89-J
RMA2023-00189-K
RMA2023-00189-L
RMA2023-00189-M
RMA2023-00189-N
RMA2023-00189-O
RMA2023-00189-P
RMA2023-00189-Q
RMA2023-00189-R
RMA2023-00189-S
RMA2023-00189-T
RMA2023-00189-U
RMA2023-00189-V
RMA2023-00189-W
RMA2023-00189-X
RMA2023-00 I 89-Y
American Business Machines
PWCanon Copier
Swr/Canon Copier
Wtr/Canon Copier
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0017:

Total for Vendor 0017 (American Business Machines):

BSKAssociates
Wtr/Weekly Bacti Sample
Wtr/Curry Site Drinking Wat€r Sample
Wtr/Curry Site We€kly Ninate Sampl€
Wtr,Drinking Wat€r Sample Sampl€
Wtr/Weekly Bacti Sampl€
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0061:

Total for Vendor 0061 (BSK Associates):

Central San Joaquin Valley RMA
Gc/3Q22-23,4nsuranc€ Premiums
Fin/3Q22-23llnsurance Premiums
Pw3Q22-23^nsurance Premiuhs
Comm/3Q22-23llnsurance Pr€miums
DSD/3Q22-23llnsurance Pr€rniums
lT/3Q22-23^dsuranc€ Premiums
ED/1Q22-23,{nsurance h€miums
Code Enfl3Q22-23llnsulance Premiums
PD/3Q22-23Ansurance Premiums
Council/3Q22-23^nsurance Pr€miums
City Clerld3Q22-23^nsurance Premiums
Treasurer/3 Q22-23llnsurance Premiums
Strts-Rds/3Q22-23[nsurance Premiurts
Ref/3Q22-23llnsurance Premiums
Wtr/3Q22-23llnsuranc€ Premiums
Srr/3Q22-23^nsurance Prcmiums
Tmsit/3Q22-23llnsulance Pr€miums
Air/3Q22-23^nsurance Premiums
LLD/3Q22-23^nsurance Premiums
LlD/3Q22-23[nsurance Premiums
LlD/3Q22-23,{nsurance Premiums
LLD/3Q22-23[nsuance Premiums
LLD/3Q22-23llmurdnc€ Premiums
GG/3Q22-23lworken Comp
Fin/3Q22-23lwo*ers Comp
PW3Q22-BNVorkers Comp

7.00 19.62

19.63 46.25
9l.00
4l.50
4l.50
4l.50
l3l.50
347.00
347.00
61,329.s8

29.t6

74.26 8.41
tzo.34

6.96 7.68

23.51 443.37

4.69 10.99

0.63 3,213.49
6,117.05
27,572.E0
3?,500.55
1,263.08
7,149.74
l.9l
o.77

2.68 I4.84

6.51 201..34
4,06/'.39
AP Ch€cks by Date - Detail by Vendor Number (11912023 8:25 |M) Paee I Check No Veddor No
Invoice No
Vendor N4me
Description
Check Date
Referenc€
Check Amourt
RMA2023-00189-Z
RMA2023 -001 89ZA
RMA2023-0018928
RMA2023-00t892C
RMA2023 -001 89ZD
RMA2023-001892E
RMA2023-001892F
RMA2023-001 892G
RMA2023-001892H
RMA2023-001892r
RMA2023-001 89ZJ
RMA2023-001 89ZK
RMA2023-00189.zL
RMA2023-00189,ZM
RMA2023-00 I 89ZN
RMA2023-00 I E9ZO
RMA2023-001892P
RMA2023-001892Q
RMA2023-00189.ZR
RMA2023-00 I 892S
0182
8017
4022
8023
Comrn /3Q22-23lworkers Comp
DSD/3Q22-23A orkers Comp
lT/3Q22-23nvork€rs Comp
ED/3Q22-23^fforkels Comp
Code Enf/3Q22-23lworkers Comp
PD/3Q22-23lworkers Comp
Council/3Q22-23lworkers Comp
City Clerk3Q22-B^Ir'orkers Comp
Treasurer/3Q22-23^Jvork€rs Comp
Strts-Rdy3Q22-23/Worke6 Comp
Ref/3Q22-23,^Vorkers Comp
Wh/3Q22-23,^Vork€rs Comp
Swr/3Q22-23,4[orkers Cornp
Trarsit3Q22-23/Workers Comp
Air/3Q22-23n ork€rs Comp
LLD/3Q22-23^[orkers Comp
LLD/3Q22-23n orkers Comp
LLD/3Q22-23,^Vorkers Comp
Ll-D/3Q22-23^fiorkers Comp
LLD/3Q22-23Aflorken Comp
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0 I 0 I :

Total for Vendor 0101 (C€ntral San Joaquin Valley RMA):

P&J Electric Inc.

Wtr/Pumps for W€lls
Air/Fuel Island R€pairs
Strts/Streei Light Electrical Troubleshoor
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0182:

Total for Vendor 0182 (P&J Electric Inc.):

Mission Linen & Uniform Service
PW4-inen Maintenance
SWi/WWTP Mats
Pwllinen Maintenance
S*r/WWTP Mats
PWLinen Maintenance
SWTAi/WTP Mats
PWI-inen Maintenance
SwI/WWTP Mats
Total for this ACH Check lor Vendor 0300:

Total for Vendor 0300 (Mission Linen & Uniform Service):

Willdan Financial Services
GG/CFD2o1 7- l dan-Mar 2023
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023lTract 6062 Heritage (
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2oBnftd 6212 Clcat Vie.

LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023lTract 6215 Autrmn I
LLD Admin Jan-Mai 2023/Tracr 6216 Alra Hom
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023/Tract 6248 ce d Jo4
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023/Tract 5812 KB Orch;
215.62
2,279.72
158.12
196.93
934.91
22,596.59
120.30
174.33
t6.22
1,346.18
26'7.99
7,10t.73
3,524.69

69.40 |,472.t4
t2t.90

48.16 170.67
945.0',1
414.47
I98,012.00
ACH
198,012.00
673.2',1
1,086.62
711.08
2,470.97
ACH 0300
518364838
518364839
518408138
518408339
5lE45l8l3
518451814
514492966
5t8492967
2,470.97
l5?.68

27.14 160.33

27.14 160.33

32.47 114.67

32.87 '778.23
ACH 0310
010-53360
010-53361
010-53361-A
010-53361-B
010-53361-c
010-53361-D
010-53361-E
778.23
ry'55.48
194.44
1t4.21
2r5.32
692.41

90.01 627.64
AP Checks by Date - D€tail by Vendor Number (U9l2A3 8:25 l\Nf) P^ge 2 Check No Vendor No
Invoic€ No
Vendor Name
De8cription
Check Dste
Reference
CheckAmount
010-53361-F
0r0-53361-G
0r0-J3361-H
010-53361-I
010-53361-J
010-53361-K
010-53361-L
010-53361-M
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023/Tract 4927 Mulberry
LLD Admin Jar-Mar 2023lTract 6360 Mill St. C
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023PM 10997 Industrial
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023FM I1353 Tehachapi
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023PM 12219 Pilot Truc
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023/TR 6668 Pinon
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023/PM I 1 353
LLD Admin Jan-Mar 2023lPMlO997

5.29 35.43

14.16 24.96

49.62 38.80
319.51
Total for lhis ACH Check for Vendor 03 I 0:

Total for Vendor 0310 (Willdan Financial Services):

Southem Califomia Edison
Wr/8004425404/ 126 S Snyder Ave/Oct 6-Nov 6
Wtr/8004425404/126 S Snyder Ave/Oct 6-Nov 6
Wtr/8004425233/Denison WelVOct 6-Nov 6 202
Strts/8003547822904/800 S Curry Sr #A./Nov 16
PW800102684E/l0l Commercial Way/Nov l7-:

GG/8003354652/115 S Robinson St/Nov l?-De(
DSD/8003367862/I l7 S Robinson St/Nov l7-D{
Air/800103?98 I /409 Bryan Ctlllov l7-Dec l6 2
Air/8000l46lssDennison s/o Hwy 58Nov 17-I
Air/8000152422/314 N Hayes SLNov 17-Dec tt
Air/80003 61 33 I /3 14 N Haycs St Papi/Nov I 7-D
Air/8000tE0034/3 14 N Hayes St #c3Nov t7-D
Air/800 I 144201/3 14 N Hayes St #B/Nov I 7-D€i
Air/8003312447/3 14 N Hayes St/Nov l7-Dec l(
Air/8003312881/9999 l/2 Haycs StTNov 1?-D€c
Air/8003326595/3 16 N Mojave StNov l7-Dec I
AirlE0033546144[est End Teh AiryorLNov 171
Strrs/E000778639/1668 Tehachapi Blvd #A-AIov
Strts/8000?7943 1/ 1 668 Tehachapi Blvd fBNov
Srrts/8003489234/500 Tucker Rd,Nov 3- Dec 5 I
Srrts/80024?53 8l /2069 E Tehachapi Blvd BA.{or
strts/E002489094/2069 E Tehachapi Blvd ANo\
Strts/80005029?6/318 East E St/Nov 21- Dcc 20
PW800l I15138/114 S Green St/Nov 2l- Dec 2(
GG/800441l64l/31I East D St/Nov 21- Dec 20 l
Stirs/80009?3948/ I l3 S Mojave SLNov 2l- D€c
GG/8000072472/11I West I St/Nov 23- Dec 22 :

Swr/E002521204/800 Enterprise WWTPNoV 23
GG/8003 3 26651n 09 E Tehachapi BlvdNov 22-
LLD/8002951475/329 l/2 D Sy'Nov 22-Dec 2l :

Swr/80033 52493/880 Enteryrise WWTP Pond/N
GG/8002106277 /20O W Tehachapi Blvd,Nov 23
Strts/8003885019/333 l/2 E Tehachapi Blvd,/No.

Strts/t0049512321209 l/2 ETehachapi Btvd./No,
PD18002893411/220West C St/Nov 23-Dec 22 i
srrts/8000096590/205 N Mill srNov 28-Dec 26
Strts/8001230096/33 5 Tehachapi Blvd Ped/Nov
Stds/8003 365285/Tehachapi Blvd Wo creen,Nc
SEts/80O3 887352/ l03Tehachapi Blvd/Nov 28-D
Strts/8003887511/101 E Tehachapi Blvd #B,No\
PW8000413506/801 Mountain \4ew AvoNov 2
4,193.7 |
ACH 0372
t2122022
t2122022-A
12122022-B
12162022
12172022
t2t'72022-A
t2l'72022-B
r2t72022-C
12172022-D
t2172022-E
12172022-F
t2t72022-G
12172022-H
12172022-l
t2172022-I
12172022-K
121'12022-L
12202022
12202022-A
12202022-B
12202022-C
12202022-D
\22r2022
122t2022-A
12212022-B
122t2022-C
t2232022
12232022-A
12232022-B
12232022-C
12232022-D
12232022-E
12232022-F
12232022-G
12232022'H
t22?2022
122',72022-A
12272022-8
12272022-C
12772022-D
12272022-E
4,193.7 |
't2.16

12.16 3,234.03

70.42 64.86
|,\73.54
333.98
254.07
206.71
E4.74

90.93 t4.43
26't.16
120.23
222.37

34.82 44.EE

68.23 26.t6
t6.t9

26.1a

60.78 4l.41

13.Ol
352.16

84.97 13.38
12,116.01

65.62 29.42
| 494.97
180.95
8t.44

15.E9
2,501.58
't2.4E

23.00 58.45
113.27

35.21 23,967.11
AP Checks by Date - D€tail by V€ndor Number (ll9/2023 8:25 l\\4\ Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 03?2:

Check No Vendor No
Invoice No
Vendor Name
Dercription
Check Datc
Reference
CheckAmount
ACH 0395
Gascol2l622
Gasco I 21622-A
Gasool2l622-C
GEsCol2l622-D
Total for Vendor 0372 (Southem Califomia Edison):

The Gas Company
Policc Dept # I 285 I 696026No\r l4-De. 14 2021
Annex #088 I 702005Nov l4-Dec 14 2022
City Hall #0655 | 70400?Nov 14-Dec 14 2022
Airport #01091699981/Nov l4-De. 14 2022
Visitor Center #10561664466Nov l4-Dec 14 20
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0395:

Total for Vendor 0395 (The Gas Company):
23,967.11
1,395.69
361.74
337.47
23a.66

20.84 2,360.40
ACH
ACH
0450
t9s192
198383
M76
309124
309t25
309571
310638
ACH 0509
220t983873
90323703
o524
v33
ACH 0745
r506980
r507479
USA Bluebook
Swr/Lab Material
Wtr/Sulfruic Acid
Jim Burke Ford
PWTE-29 casket Exhaust
PWTE-29 Sensor
2,360.40
107.67

36.49 Totrl for rhis ACH Check for Vendo. 0450:

Total for Vendor 0450 (USA Bluebook):

WITTS Everything for the Office
GG/BindersDens/Paper Clips/Inl
GG/Copy Paper
CG/Tile FoldeG
Fitr/Oflice Supplies
Totrl for this ACH Check for Vendor (X76:

Total for Vendor 0476 (WITTS Everything for the Office):

Safety-Kleen Systems Inc.

KCFD Helicopter/Teh Hanger
PWOiI Dis!'osal
Total for this ACH Chcck for Vendor 0509:

Total for Vendor 0509 (Safety-Kleen Systems Inc.):

Scotts Auto Body Inc.

Wtlnr'-33 Meel Alignment
S\rtlv-44 Wheel Balaflc€
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0524:

Total for Vendor 0524 (Scotts Auto Body Inc.):
t44.t6
144.t6
131.77

62.t9

26.80 57.43
278.19
278.\9
519.89
2t4.50
734.39
ACH
734.39

85.00 92.00
t77.OO
177.00
879.97

76.71 AP Checks by Date - D€tail by Vendor Number (l/912023 8:25 AM1 Total for this ACH Check for Verdor 0745:

Check No Vendor No
Invoic€ No
Vendor Nam€
Dcscription
Ch€ck Drle
Reference
Check Amount
ACH 0817
100600984
Total for Vendor 0745 (Jim Burke Ford):

Kimball Midwest
Pwsolv€nt/Lubricant for V€hicl€s
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 08 I 7:

Total for Vendor 0817 (Kimball Midwest):

ACWA-/JPIA
Medical Insurance Premium & Adjustrnent
D€ntal Insuance Premium & Adjustrnent
Vision Insuranc€ Prernium & Adjustment
Life Insurance Premium & Adjustrnent
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0832:

Total for Vendor 0832 (ACWAdPIA):

Three-Way Chevrolet
PW/TE-33 Fuel Pump
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1085:

Total for vendor I 085 (Three-way chevrolet):

M&M's Sports Uniforrns & Embroidery
Wtr/Safety Vests/Jackets
Ssr/Saf€ty Vests/Jackets
Pwsafety Vests/Jackets
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor I 286:

Total for Vendor 1286 (M&M's Sports Unifoms & Embroidery):

Tehachapi Plumbitrg Company
PWDisposal at Scnior Center
PWR€pair Womens Restroom
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor I 329:

Total for Vendor 1329 (T€hachapi Plumbing Company):

Association of Califomia Water Agencies
2023 Annual Agency Dues
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1348:

Total for Vendor I 348 (Association of Califomia Vy'ater Agencies):

Grainger
PWEar Plugs
956.68
317.3E
317.38
ACH 0832
069a362
069a362-A
069E362-B
069a362-C
317.38
10,180.17
9,2t8.67
1,419.06
1,765.85
82,584.35
82,584.35
ACH
ACH
1085
cvcsl387l E 200.00
1286
54289
542E9-A
54289-B
t329
t0425
10441
1348
ACWA2023
ACH t44l
95379630n2
200.00
562.82
402.01
3,055.29
4,D20.12
ACH
4,O20.t2
350.00
183.00
533.00
ACH
533.00
16,840.00
t6,840.00
16,840.00

66.M
AP Checks by Date - Detail by V€ndor Numb€r (l/9/2023 8:25 AM) Page 5 Check No Vendor No
Invoice No
VendorName
Dcscription
Check Date
Reference
CheckAmount
9537961010 PwTrail€r Water H€at€i
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1441:

Total for Vendor l44l (Grainger):

Bakersfield Well & Pump Compary
Pond 13 Pump Station
Total forthisACH Check for Vendor 1912:

Total for Verdor 1912 (Bakersfield Well & Pump Company):

Tehachapi Lawn and GardeD EquipmeDr
Wtr/Oil for Saw
Total for lhis ACH Check for Vendor I 947:

Total for Verdor 1947 (Tehachapi Lawn and Gard€n Equipment):

SSD Systems
DSDRemote Programming Fee
Tolal for this ACH Check for Vendor I 982:

Total for V€ndor 1982 (SSD Systems):

Cofee Break Seivice Inc.

Gc/Coffee S€ivic€ & Supplies
Tol.al for this ACH Check for V€ndor 2 147:

Total for Vendor 2147 (Coffee Break Service Inc.):

Holliday Rock Co. lnc.

Strtvcedar Ci Curb & cutter
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2600:

Total for Vendor 2600 (Holliday Rock Co. Inc.):

USPS-Hassler
Postage/Acct #216528/Agreem€nt #40086982
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2676:

Total for Vendor 2676 (USPS-Hassler):

Steam Cleaners Inc.

PWT-128 Hydro Pressurc Washer
Wtr/T-128 Hydrc hessure Washer
Swr/T-l2E Hydro Pressur€ Washer
498.97
565.41
ACH
565.41
25,685.00
t912
Iob #22831
ACH 1947
243',t8
ACH 1982
P-01005041
25,685.00
25,685.00
t4t.22
t4t.22
t4t.22

29.60 29.60

29.60 86.08
ACH
ACH
214',7
D095922

86.08 2600
1483640
ACH 2676
usPs 12t922
122.ss
1,000.00
t,000.00
ACH 2722
I15793
115793-A
I15793-8
1,000.00
419.30
419.29
419.29
AP Checks by Dat€ - Detail by Vendor Number (1/9/2023 8:25 AM Page 6 Check No Vendor No
Invoice No
Vendor Name
Description
Check Date
Rcference
CheckAmount
Total for this ACH Check for Vendot 2122:

Total for Vendor 2?22 (Steam Cleaners Inc.):

CivicPlus
GG/Qtly F€e Renewal and Hosting & Suppon
Total for this ACH Check foi vendor 29 14:

Total for Vendor 2914 (CivicPlus):

Verizon Wireless
Fin/Mobile Broadband #872239130/Nov 14-Dec
Gc^tobile Broadband #'l 7 2231 654 NoIr' lg-Dd,
Pw^,lobile Broadband #'7 7 223'1 65 4 N oy l 9 -Del
PD,4\4obile Broadband #172237 654fNoy lyDec
ED/tlobile Broadband #17 2237 654N ov 19 -Dec
Swr^,Iobile Broadband #772237654lNov l9-De,
PD,4{obile Broadband #37 2237 6'7 6 N ov 2l -D e.

GGA4obile Broadband #3'l 2237 67 6 N o1 2 l -D e(
Total for lhis ACH Check for Vmdot 301l:

Total for Vendor 301I (Verizon Wireless):

Hilltop Publishers Home ofthe Loop
ED/Digital Network Media Hostitrg Mo. F€e/Oc1
Total for this ACH Ch€ck for V€ndor 3l{X:

Total for Vendor 3104 (Hilltop Publish€rs Home ofthe Loop):

S. G. Soto Tires Service
Wtr/V-33 New Tires
Swrny'-44 Tire Balance
PWAy'-25 N€w Tires
Total for this ACH Ch€ck for Vqdor 3173:

Total for Vendor 31 73 (S. G- Soto Tires Service):

Statewide Traffic Safety & Signs Inc.

Sfis/Stre€t Markers
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3281:

Total for Vendor 3281 (Statewide Traffic Safety & Signs Inc.):

Fresno Rack & Shelving Inc.

Pwshelving for Sreets (Shop)
|,251.88
1,257.88
2,861.45
ACH 29t4
249119
ACH 3011
9922941591
9923276028
9923216028-A
9923276024-8
9923276028-C
9923276028-D
9923402152
9923402152-A
ACH 3104
2532a
3173
1443
t445
t449
3281
12016981
ACH 3504
25016
2,861.45
2,861.45

38.01 l5l.M
612.16

78.02 38.01

28.14 76.02

38.01 1,060.01
1,060.01
1,78?.00
3,787.00
ACH
3,787.00
400.61

32.18 854.85
t,281.64
ACH
1,281.64

39.41 19.41

39.41 3318.54
AP Ch€cts by Date - Detail by Vendor Number (lAl2023 8:25 AM) P^ge 7 Check No Vendor No
Invoice No
Vendor Name
Descrlption
Check D.tc
RefereDce
Ch€ckAmount
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 35(X:

Total for Vendor 3504 (Fresno Rack & Shelving Inc.):

Van Lant & Fankhanel LLP
FY202l-22 Audit Services
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3622:

Total for Vendor 3622 (Van Lant & Fanklnnel LLP):

PR Diamond Products Inc.

Wti/Hnd H€ld Saw
UsE Tax 7 .25Yo
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3668:

Total for Vendor 3668 @R Diamond Products Inc.):

Vortex Industries Inc.

Airlcate Repai6
Total for this ACH Chcck for V€ndor 3680:

Total for Vendor 3680 (Vortex Industries Inc.):

Customiz€d Custodial Services
Janitorial Services for Visiton Center/Jan 2023
Janito.ial Services for Public Works{an 2023
Janitorial Serviccs for Water DeplJJan 2023
Jani(orial Services for Sewer Facility/Jan 2023
Janitotial Services for Sewer Bathroorn/Jan 2023
Janitorial Services for AiJport/JN 2023
Janitorial Scrvices for Airport Lounge/Jan 2023
Ja todal Services for Senior Center/Jan 2023
Janitorial Services for City HalVJan 2023
Janitoiial Servic€s forAnrcx/Jan 2023
Janitorial Servic€s for Police Dept/Jan 2023
Janitorial Servic€s for Bus Statior an 2023
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3708:

Total for Vendor 3708 (Customized Custodial Sewices):

Diamond Technologies
ITlFir€wall R€plac€mc
IT/Monthly Microsoft 365/Nov 2022
IT^,lanage Cetsic ComplEEID@ 2022
IT/Docking Station for Erik C & Loaner LapTop
IT/Dell OptiPlex 5070 One Year Warr.nty Rerc1
IT,tlonthly Microsoft 365 lDe. 2022
3,418.54
ACH 3622
vLot032023
3,418.54
22,800.00
22,t00.00
ACH 3668
0063309-rN
0063309-IN-A
22,E00.00
1,178.68
-79.68
1,099.00
ACH
1,099.00
1,560.00
3680
42-t642250
ACH 3708
coTo123
coTol23-A
cor0l23-B
coTo t 23-c
coTol23-D
coTo123-E
coTot23-F
coT0l23-G
coTol23-H
coTo123-I
coTo123-J
coT0l23-K
ACH 3807
31540
323ltMS
32319C
32414
32463
32489MS
1,560.00
1,560.00
105.00
262.OO
:05.50
305.50
150.00
323.00
193.00
519.00
1,026.00
622.OO
2,275.O0
160.00
6,246.O0
6,246.00
t6,256.28
2,25't.60
22,909.16
7t't.75
?9.00
2,209.60
AP Checks by Dat€ - Ixtail by Vendor Nuhber (l/9/2023 8:25 Alf) Page 8 Chcck No vendor No
Inyoice No
Vendor N{me
Delcription
Check Drte
Reference
CheckAmount
Total for lhis ACH Check for Vendor 3807:

Total for vendor 3807 @iamond Technologies):

Global Corporate Trust Svc TFMCM9705 I
Strts/Facility Le6se #CIEDB,0l-019/Interest
Wtr,Sacility kase #CIEDB-o1-0l9Anterest
Sw/Facility Lease #CIEDB-o1-olg/IDt€rest
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3824:

Total for Vendor 3824 (Global Corporate Trust Svc TFMCM9705 U.S. Bank):

Mary Valenti PH.D.

PD/CII
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3854:

Total for Vendor 3854 (Mary Valenti PH.D.):

Traffic Management Incorporated
Strtvstreet Signs
Sttvstreet Signs
Total for ihis ACH check for vendor 3868:

Total for Vendor 3868 (Traffic Management Incorporated):

Babcock Laboratories, Inc.

SWI/WWTP Weekly Sampletoct I 9-Nov 9 202:

Total for this ACH Ch€ck for Vendor 401 I :

Total for Vendor 401 I (Babcock Laboratories, Inc.):

Waxie Sanitary Supply
PD/Janitorial Suppli€s
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4036:

Total for Vendor 4036 (Waxie Sanitary Supply):

Language Line Serviccs Inc
PD/Translation Services
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4063:

Total for Vendor 4063 (I-anguage Line Services Inc):

American Safety Services Inc
Swr/t ck Out Tags
44,429.99
ACH 3824
63662
63662-A
63662-B
44,429.99
6,0't3.94
365.89
878.l6
1,311 .99
1,317.99
400.00
ACH
ACH
A
'I{
3854
MVt1282022
3868
935679
938002
4011
cL20512-8827
4036
81288720
400.00
1,714.15
263.87
|,91A.O2
ACH
|,9',t8.02
1,084.00
1,084.00
1,084.00
130.64
130.64
ACH
130.64
|.25
4063
10695790
ACH 4065
308553 S
1t.25

11.25 146.M
AP Checks by Dat€ - Detail by Vendor Number (l/912023 8.25 A\l\ Page 9 CheckNo Vendor No
Invoice No
Vendor Name
D.icrlptior
Check Drte
Reference
CheckAmount
Total for this ACH Ch€ck foi Vendor 4065:

Total fior Vetrdor 4065 (American Safety Scrviccs Inc):

Ray Morgan Company
GG,Ricoh Copier Ja +Apr 3 2023
Tolal for this ACH Check for Vendor 4096:

Total for Vendor 4096 @ay Morgan Company):

Kem Couty Public Works
Gas Tax/Trash Disposal Nov 2022
Pw/Irdsh Disposal Nov 2022
Ref/Trash Disposal Nov 2022
Air/Trash Disposal Nov 2022
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 41 38:

Total for Vendor 4138 (Kem County Public Works):

Core & Main LP
Wtr/Water Line Repair
Swr^,tarking Painy'Chalk
Wtr/Bacmow Blsnkets
Wtr/Pip€ Fittings
Wtr/Water Lin€ Rcprir Supplies
Total for lhis ACH Check for Vendor 4 I 57:

Total for Vendor 4 | 57 (Core & Main LP):

Waste Management (ACH)
PwPropatr€ for PW Shop
Total for this ACH Check for Veador 4230:

Total for Vendor 4230 (Waste Management (ACH)):

Triad Investigative Services
PD/Backgound ltrvestigatiorl/Camacho
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4265:

Total for Vendor 4265 (Triad Investigative Services):

Amber Cherical Irc
Wtr^lypochloriie Solutiods-Currj' Siie
Wtr^Iypochlorite Solutions-Wal storn Well
Wtr/Tlypochlorite Solutions-Dennison Well
Wtr/Hypochlorite Solutions-Mojave Well
Wtr^lypochlo.il€ Solutions-Milrton Well
146.U
ACH 4096
394r991
4138
3to73
31073-A
31073-8
3to73-C
ACH

91.33 1,tot.42

2.32 4.06

1.16 I,108.96
ACH 4157
R944429
R9E53?0
s066255
s090050
s097178
I,108.96
367.E3
123.35
423.97
278.22
t5E.60
2,05r.97
2,O5t.97
ACH
ACH
4230
01451304792-6
684.49
4265
22-0M8
ACH 4272
0376215-IN
0376216-IN
0376217-rN
0376218-IN
0376219-IN
345.00
345.00
3n.47
320.46
t60.23
534.1I
421.28
A? Checks by Dat€ - Detail by V€dor Number (1/912023 8:25 1|J|i) Pag€ l0 CheckNo Vendoi No
Invoice No
Vendor Nrme
Deicription
Check Drte
Reference
Check Amount
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4272:

Total for Vendor 4272 (Amber Chemical Inc):

Tolal for lhis ACH Check for V€ndor 43 I 5:

Total for Vendor 43 I 5 (Wex Bank):
t,8t 5.95
ACH 4274
341
1,815_95
1,800.00
Total for lhis ACH Check for Vendor 4278:

Total for Vendor 4278 finnovative Tre€ Service):

ACC Business
GG/Fiber for PD Nov ll-De. 102022
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 43 12:

Total for Vendor 4312 (ACC Bushes6):

Nagle Earthworks
Cig Fur|ded Road Rehab FY 2ll22
Tolal for this ACH Check for Vendor 431 3:

Total for Vendor 4313 (Nagle Earthworks):

Innovative Tree Service
PWTrcc Trimming RR Paik
Wex Bar*
PD/Fuel for Patot Vehicles
Global Environmental Products
Sw/E-218 Brooms
1,E00.00
ACH
1,E00.00
703.66
43t2
223457885
4313
R22122-2
4315
85608844
4364
AB 132023
703_66
703.66
83,584.64
ACH
ACH
ACH
83,584.64
83,584.64
142.47
ACH 4363
614557
142.47
1,630.35
Total for tlis ACH Check for V€ndor 4363:

Total for Vendor 4363 (Global Environmental Products):

Anthony Bonelli
PD/Tuition Reimbus€/Basic Pesce Office. Mod'
Tolal for this ACH Check for Vsndor 4364:

Total for Verdor 4364 (A.nthony Bonelli):

Orkin
PD,lPest Insp€ction
DSD/Pest Insp€ction
GG,{P€st lnspection
1,630.35
1,630.35
462.@
ACH 4389
237081E95
2401$2a1
240143324
462.OO
106.00

81.00 81.00
AP Checks by Date - Dotail by Vendor Numbcr (l/9/2023 8:25 AM) Page 1l ChcckNo Vcndor No Vendor Nrme Check Date
Refererce
CheckAmount
InvoiceNo Dcscription
Total for this ACH Chock for Vendor 4389:

Total for Vendor 4389 (Otkin):

Springbrook Holding Co. LLC
Civic PaylPay Pad & Transactiotr Fees/Dec 2022
Buciness License Traitring/Dec 2022
Business Licens€ Training/Nov 2022
Total for this ACH Check for Veidor 4,r0O:

Total for Vendor 4400 (Springbrook Hotding Co. LLC):

Quadient Finance USA Inc. (ACH)
Gc/hiority Mail Nov 2l-Def 20 2022
Total for thk ACH Check for Vendor 4420:

Total for VendolH2O (Quadient Finance USA Inc. (ACH)):

Doug Mccombs Sand & Gravel
Strts/Base
SWtr/Base
Total fot this ACH Check for Vendor 4578:

Total for Vendor 4578 (Doug Mccoobs Sand & Gravel):

SOLV Business Solutions
Fir/W-2 and 1099 Forms
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4588:

Total for Vendor 4588 (SOLV Business Solutions):

Pape Material Handling
PWE-211 Repair
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4604:

Total for Vendor 4604 (Pape Material Handling):

Heritag€ Crystal Clean LLC
Airrused Oil Pickup
Total for lhis ACH Ch€ck for Verdor 4606:

Total for Vendor 4606 (Heritage Crystal Clean LLC):

Ten-West Towing, Inc.

PWTE-33 Tow to Yard
268.00
ACH 4400
rNV-o11475
TM tnv-005818
TM Inv-005910
268.00
E06.30
236.25
%.50
1,t37.05
ACH 4420
20t4a24-2032247
1,137.05
1,149_69
1,149.69
ACH
|,149.69
720.OO
720.00
4578
22E0
22aO-A
ACH 4588
426559
4604
14140398
4606
1773r918
ACH 464r
2022-226E2
1,440.00
1,440.00
134.45
ACH
134.45
2,3t1.47
2,3t't.47
ACH
2,3t1.47
610.00
610.00
610.00
405.00
AP Checks by Dare - Detail by Vendor Number (U912O23 8:25 1.lv\ P^ge 12 Check No Vendor No
Invoice No
Vendor Name
Description
Check D4te
Refercnce
CheckAmount
2022-22110 PWTE-33 Tow to Bakersli€ld
Total for this ACH Check for V€ndor 4641:

Total for Vendor 4641 (Ten-West Towing, Inc.):

Charter Communications
Gc/Intemet Service D€c 21 2022-l^n 20 2023
Total for this ACH Ch€ck for V€ndor 4642:

Total for Vendor 4642 (Charter Commrmications):

Brightview Landscape Services lnc.

Pwlandscaping along Dennison
PWGrcen Waste Disposavoct-Nov 2022
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4645:

Total for Vendor 495 (Brightview Landscape Sewices Inc.):

U.S. Bark
Fin/lnvestrn€nt Acct Admin Fee/Nov 2022
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4647:

Total for Vendor 4647 (J.S. Bank):

Dalia Motor Group Inc.

Pw/TE-2g Cover
PWTE-37 Bumper Ropair
Total for this ACH ch€ck for vendor 4666:

Total for V€trdor 4666 (Dalia Motor Group Inc.):

Cummins Sales and Service
WtrDinon Generator Seffice
PWCity Hall Generator Service
Total for lhis ACH Check for Vendor 4673:

Total for Vendor 4673 (Cummins Sales and Service):
969.@
969.60
t76.t7
ACH
ACH
4642
161152501122t22
4645
8216110
JOB #43 I 600009
464',7
13540756
4666
56t862
633624
46'73
Y8-30168
Y8-10219
176.17
t76.r7
t2,664.O8
1,781.93
t4,446.O1
ACH
14,446.O1
274.49
278.49
ACH
278.49

53.20 1,103.02
|,156.22
ACH
|,t56.22
|,t24.61
t,t22.ol
2,246.62
2,246.62
588,856.25
A? Check by Date - Detail by Vendor Number (U9/2U3 tt25 lM Report Total (70 checks):

CITY OF TEHACHAPI

INVESTMENT REPORT
December 31, 2022

INVESTMENTS

PURCHASE MATURITY ACCOUNT/ STATED PAR PURCHASE MARKET YIELD TO

DATE DATE CUSIP INSTITUTION RATE AMOUNT AMOUNT VALUE MATURITY U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES
06-21-22 12-31-22 912828N30 US Treasury Note 2.13 1,000,000.00 998,985.00 1,000,000.00 2.32 04-06-22 04-30-23 912828R28 US Treasury Note 1.63 1,000,000.00 998,470.00 990,700.00 1.77 06-21-22 10-31-23 9128285K2 US Treasury Note 2.88 500,000.00 498,832.50 492,520.00 3.05 04-06-22 03-31-25 9128284F4 US Treasury Note 2.63 250,000.00 250,000.00 240,860.00 2.63 TOTAL U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES $ 2,750,000.00 $ 2,746,287.50 $ 2,724,080.00

GOVERNMENT AGENCY ISSUES
08-10-22 c 02-09-24 3133ENNE6 Federal Farm Credit Bank 1.23 500,000.00 486,423.50 479,540.00 3.10 04-25-22 c 04-25-24 3130ARMY4 Federal Home Loan Bank 2.65 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 969,880.00 2.65 07-14-22 c 07-14-25 3134GXZT4 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 4.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 489,940.00 4.00 04-28-22 c 04-28-26 3130ARN64 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.13 250,000.00 250,000.00 237,970.00 3.13 08-10-22 08-03-26 3133END80 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3.00 500,000.00 501,864.50 479,165.00 2.90 04-06-22 04-05-27 3133ENTS9 Federal Farm Credit Bank 2.60 250,000.00 249,070.25 235,170.00 2.68 04-28-22 c 04-28-27 3130ARMP3 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.23 250,000.00 250,000.00 235,725.00 3.23 c = callable
TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY ISSUES $ 3,250,000.00 $3,237,358 $3,127,390

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
12-20-22 12-20-23 20825WBH2 Connexus Credit Union 5.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,880.40 5.00 12-23-22 12-26-23 26948GAF1 Eagle Community Credit Union 5.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,882.88 5.00 08-12-22 08-12-24 05580AP24 BMW Bank 3.25 246,000.00 246,000.00 240,804.18 3.25 12-23-22 12-23-24 9497634P8 Wells Fargo Bank 4.50 249,000.00 249,000.00 248,524.41 4.50 12-27-22 12-27-24 130162AQ3 California Credit Union Glendale 4.85 248,000.00 248,000.00 249,168.08 4.85 04-07-22 04-07-25 02589AC34 American Express National Bank 2.55 246,000.00 246,000.00 235,262.10 2.55 04-08-22 04-08-25 87165HM98 Synchrony Bank 2.55 246,000.00 246,000.00 235,249.80 2.55 04-13-22 04-14-25 38149M4S9 Goldman Sachs Bank 2.55 246,000.00 246,000.00 235,178.46 2.55 12-23-22 06-23-25 920133AK1 Valley Strong Credit Union 4.80 249,000.00 249,000.00 250,237.53 4.80 08-10-22 08-11-25 795451CB7 Sallie Mae Bank 3.35 245,000.00 245,000.00 237,603.45 3.35 08-17-22 08-13-25 07371DEU7 Beal Bank USA 3.20 246,000.00 246,000.00 237,648.30 3.20 12-29-22 12-29-25 31850LAE9 First American State Bank 4.30 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,082.70 4.30 04-13-22 04-13-26 14042TFH5 Capital One Bank 2.65 246,000.00 246,000.00 231,658.20 2.65 12-21-22 12-21-26 25844MAL2 Dort Financial Credit Union 4.40 247,000.00 247,000.00 245,332.75 4.40 12-21-22 12-21-26 01664MAA4 All In Federal Credit Union 4.45 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,764.96 4.45 08-10-22 08-10-27 14042RTN1 Capital One NA 3.40 245,000.00 245,000.00 232,936.20 3.40 12-21-22 12-21-27 51828MAC8 Latino Community Credit Union 4.50 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,896.93 4.50 12-29-22 12-29-27 45157PAZ3 Ideal Credit Union 4.50 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,889.46 4.50 12-30-22 12-30-27 01882MAA0 Alliant Credit Union 4.85 249,000.00 249,000.00 251,776.35 4.85 TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT $4,700,000 $4,700,000 $4,619,777

STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND
n/a n/a 98-15-914 State of California LAIF 2.17 924,930.22 $924,930.22 924,930.22 2.17 TOTAL LAIF ACCOUNTS $ 924,930.22 $924,930.22 924,930.22

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
n/a n/a 6128-001 CAMP Investment Pool 4.30 6,315,502.74 $6,315,502.74 6,315,502.74 4.30 TOTAL CAMP ACCOUNTS $ 6,315,502.74 $6,315,502.74 6,315,502.74

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY POOL

CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT
n/a n/a 99CAMBX$1 CSJVRMA Investment Pool $2,343,943.36 $2,343,943.36 2,193,145.04 TOTAL MUTUAL FUNDS $ 2,343,943.36 $2,343,943.36 2,193,145.04 SUBTOTAL OF ALL POOLED INVESTMENTS $ 20,284,376.32 $ 20,268,022.07 $ 19,904,825.14

POOLED CASH BANK ACCOUNTS
BANK

STATEMENT

ACCOUNT NAME INSTITUTION BALANCE

CITY OF TEHACHAPI BANK ACCOUNTS
General Checking Bank of the Sierra 493,069.26
Police Department Bank of the Sierra 12,951.62
Water Deposit Trust Bank of the Sierra 125,241.50
Payroll Bank of the West 66,534.87
AFLAC Flex Spending Bank of the West 17,358.59
Airport Credit Card Sales Bank of the West 101,303.81
Ashtown Water Escrow Bank of the West 113,770.51
TOTAL CITY OF TEHACHAPI BANK ACCOUNTS $930,230

CITY FISCAL AGENT CASH

PURCHASE MATURITY ACCOUNT INTEREST MARKET YIELD TO

DATE DATE FUND NUMBER RATE COST VALUE MATURITY

BOND PROCEEDS
$ - $ -
1 CITY OF TEHACHAPI

INVESTMENT REPORT
December 31, 2022

RDA SUCCESSOR AGENCY FISCAL AGENT CASH

PURCHASE MATURITY ACCOUNT INTEREST MARKET YIELD TO

DATE DATE FUND NUMBER RATE COST VALUE MATURITY

BOND PROCEEDS
TEHACHAPI 2017 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS
Fiscal Agent: Bank of New York Mellon
n/a n/a 17AB TABS DEBT SERVICE 993546 3.45 60.33 60.33 3.45 n/a n/a 17AB TABS INTEREST 993547 3.45 2,715.22 2,715.22 3.45 n/a n/a 17A TABS RESERVE 993695 3.45 198,384.06 198,384.06 3.45 n/a n/a 17B TABS RESERVE 993734 3.45 202,988.11 202,988.11 3.45 TOTAL TEHACHAPI 2017 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS $404,147.72 $404,147.72

SUMMARY OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash in Bank Accounts $ 930,230
Pooled Cash Investments $ 19,904,825.14
City Fiscal Agent Cash $ -
Subtotal $20,835,055
Successor Agency Fiscal Agent Cash $404,148
Grand total $21,239,203 *
Investment Policy Statement
All investments are in full compliance of with the City of Tehachapi Investment Policy. The City of Tehachapi will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months.

The market values presented for pooled City investments are based on closing prices for the related investment as of the date of this report. This information was obtained from Intercontinental Exchange, Bloomberg, Refinitiv, and other reliable sources of market prices. 2 THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

TEHACHAPI REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

TO BOARD DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR
AGENCY

TO THE TEHACHAPI REDEVELOPMENT
FROM: HAMED JONES, FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE: JANUARY L7,2023
SUBJECT: APPROVE A RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE FISCAI PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30,2024 PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE sEcTloN 34t77
Backsround
Pursuant to Section 34L77 of the Health and Safety Code ("HSC"), in order to make payments on enforceable obligations, the Successor Agency to the Tehachapi Redevelopment Agency ("Successor Agency") is required to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS") for specified fiscal periods. Each ROPS must be approved by the Oversight Board, submitted to the County AuditorController, the State Controller, as well as the State Department of Finance ("DOF"). Previously, the Successor Agency was required to prepare a ROPS for each six-month fiscal period (from July 1 through December 31, and from January 1 through June 30, respectively). Due to a change in law (SB L07) enacted in Septembe r 20L5, amended HSC Section 34177, the Successor Agency is now required to prepare only one ROPS per fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2076-L7 instead of twice a year.

All ROPS must be approved by the Oversight Board. Furthermore, each Oversight Board-approved ROPS must be submitted to the DOF for review. HSC Section 34177 also requires the Successor Agency to submit an Oversight Board-approved ROPS to the State Controller as well as to the County Auditor-Controller no later than February 'J,, 2023. A copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS must be posted on the Successor Agency's website.

The DOF may eliminate or modify any item on the ROPS before approving the ROPS. The DOF must make its determination regarding the enforceable obligations and the amount and funding source for each enforceable obligation listed on ROPS 23-24 no later than April 15,2023. Within five business days of the DOF's determination, the Successor Agency may request to "meet and confer" with the DOF on disputed items. The meet and confer period may vary, but an untimely submission of ROPS 23-24 may result in a meet and confer period of less than 30 days.

The County Auditor-Controller may object to the inclusion of any item on the ROPS that is not demonstrated to be an enforceable obligation and may object to the funding source proposed for any item. The County Auditor-Controller must provide notice of its objections to the DOF, the Successor Agency and the Oversight Board at least 60 days before disbursements from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund ("RPTTF") are required to be made.
1 267 l -0006\l 9 I 702 lv l.doc
Staff Report - Oversight Board Approval of ROPS 23-24
Page2 of 2
January 17,2023
The County Auditor-Controller is required to make RPTTF disbursements to the Successor Agency pursuant to the DOF-approved ROPS 23-24 on June 1,2023 (to cover enforceable obligation payments from July L, 2023 through December 31, 2023) and January 2, 2024 (to cover enforceable obligation payments from January t,Zo24through June 30, 2024l,.

Penolties for Foilure to Make Timely Submission
lf the Successor Agency does not submit an Oversight Board-approved ROPS 23-24 by February L,2023, the City of Tehachapi will be subject to a civil penalty of 510,000 per day for every day that ROPS 23-24 is not submitted to the DOF. The penalty will be paid to the County Auditor-Controller for distribution to the taxing entities. lf the Successor Agency does not timely submit ROPS 23-24, creditors of the Successor Agency, the DOF, and affected taxing entities may request a writ of mandate to require the Successor Agency to immediately perform this duty. Additionally, if the Successor Agency does not submit ROPS 23- 24 within 10 days of the February 1,2023 deadline, the Successor Agency's maximum administrative cost for that period will be reduced by 25 percent.
lf the Successor Agency fails to submit an Oversight Board-approved ROPS to the DOF within five business days of "the date upon which the ROPS is to be used to determine the amount of property tax allocations," the DOF may order the County Auditor-Controller to withhold a scheduled RPTTF disbursement to the Successor Agency pending the DOF's review of the related ROPS. (lt is not clear what is meant by "the date upon which the ROPS is to be used to determine the amount of property tax allocations." Possibly, it is referring to October 1 and April 1, the dates by which the County Auditor-Controller must prepare estimates for the upcoming RPTTF disbursements on January 2 and June 1, respectively, and provide the estimates to the DOF, the Successor Agency and the taxing entities.) ln conjunction with such a withholding, the DOF may order the County Auditor-Controller to disburse to the taxing entities money from the RPTTF that the DOF determines to be in excess of the amount needed for enforceable obligations.

Staff recommends that the Successor Agency adopt Resolution No. SA 01-23 approving ROPS 23-24 and taking certain related actions.

Fiscal lmpact
The preparation and submittal of ROPS 23-24is for the purpose of allowing the Successor Agency to pay its enforceable obligations for the period from July l, 2023 to June 30, 2024. The total enforceable obligations amount included the ROPS 23-24is52,L75,662.

Recommendation
ADOPT RESOTUTTON NO. SA 01.23 APPROVING THE RECOGNTZED OBIIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD FROM JULY 1,2023 THROUGH JUNE gO,2024 ("ROPS 23-24"1. 12671-0006\l9l 7021v l.doc

CITY OF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
RESOLUTION NO. SA 01-23

A RESOTUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECIORS OF THE SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE TEHACHAPI REDEVETOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING A

RECOGNIZED OBTIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDUTE FOR THE FISCAL
PERTOD FROM JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30,2024, PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34177 AND TAKING CERTAIN RETATED ACflONS
RECITALS:

A. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(ol,the Successor Agency to the Tehachapi Redevelopment Agency (the "successor Agency'') must prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule listing the anticipated payments for enforceable obligations to be made by the Successor Agency during the fiscal period from July L,2023 through June 30, 2024 ("ROPS 23-24"1and submit ROPS 23-24 to the oversight board of the Successor Agenry (the "Oversight Board") for approval.

B. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 3afi7ll(zXC) and Section 34t77(ol(Ll, the Successor Agency must: (i) submit the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 23- 24 to the DOF, the Office of the State Controller, and the County Auditor-Controller no later than Februa ry !,2023, and (ii) post a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 23'24 on the Successor Agency's website.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRE TORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEHACHAPI REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (THE "BOARD,,), HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.

CITY OF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Section 2. ROPS 23-24, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved. The Executive Director of the Successor Agenry, in consultation with the Successor Agency's legal counsel, may modify ROPS 23-24 as the Executive Director or the Successor Agency's legal counsel deems necessary or advisable.

Section 3. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to submit a copy of Oversight Board-approved ROPS 23-24to the DOF, the Office of the State Controller, and the CountyAuditor-Controller, lf the Oversight Board has not approved ROPS 23-24by February 1,2023,Staff is hereby authorized and directed to transmit ROPS 23-24 to the DOF, the Office of the State Controller, and the CountyAuditor-Controller by February L,2023,with a written notification regarding the status of the Oversight Board's review. Written notice and information regarding the action of the Oversight Board shall be provided to the DOF by electronic means and in a manner of DOF's choosing.

Section 4. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to post a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 23-24 onthe Successor Agency's lnternet website (being a page on the lnternet website of the City of Tehachapi).

Section 5. The officers and the other Staff members of the Successor Agenry are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and allthings which they may deem necessary or advisable to effectuate this Resolution, including but not limited to requesting additional review by the DOF and an opportunity to meet and confer on any disputed items, and making adjustments to ROPS 23-24 pursuant to the DOF's instructions, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. 2 CITY OF

TEHACHAPT

LEGAI DEPARTMENT
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day ofJanuary, 2023 AYES:

NOES
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

MICHAEL DAVIES, Chair of the Successor Agenry
to the Tehachapi Redevelopment Agency
ATTEST
TORI MARSH, Secretary of the Successor Agency
To the Tehachapi Redevelopment Agency
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Successor Agency to the Tehachapi Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on January L7,2023.

TORI MARSH, Secretary of the Successor Agency
To the Tehachapi Redevelopment Agency
a
J
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-241- Summary Filed for the July 1 ,2023 through June 30,2024 Period
Successor Agency: Tehachapi
County: Kern
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
23-24ATotal
(July -
December)
23-248Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 23-24
Total
A Enforceabte Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D)
B Bond Proceeds
C Reserve Balance
D Other Funds
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G)

F RPTTF
G Administrative RPTTF
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E)
$ 644,341 $ $ 6u,s41
644,341 644,341
$ 546,810 $ 924,511 $ 1,471,32',1
421,810
125,000
799,511
125,000
1,221,321
250,000
$ 1,191,151 $ 924,511 $ 2,',1',15,662
Gertification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency.

Name Title
lsl
Signature Date
Tehachapi
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-24) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024
A B c D E F G H I J K L M N o P o R S T U v w
Item
#
Pro.ject Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
23-24
Total
ROPS 23-24A (Jul - Dec)
23-24A
Total
23-248
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
$15,937,1 33 $2,1 1 5,662 $- $94,341 $- $421,810 $1 25,000 $1,191,151 Administrative
Expense
Admin
Costs
02t01t
2012
06/30/2038 City of
Tehachapi
Admin of
Suc@ssor
Agency -
RDA
Tehachapi
RDA
3,750,000 N $250,000 1 25,000 $125,000 '125,000 $1 25,000 20 2017Afax
Allocation
Refunding
Bonds
Refunding
Bonds
lssued After
6t27t12
06/30/
2017
12tUnO35 Bank of
New York
2017ATax
Allocation
Refunding
Bonds
Debt
Service
5,023,873 N $390,847 327,086 $327,086 oJ,/o r $63,761
21 20178Tax
Allocation
Refunding
Bonds
Refunding
Bonds
lssued Afier
6127t12
06/30/
2017
12tO1t2037 Bank of
New York
z01.TBfax
Allocation
Refunding
Bonds
Debt
Service
5,929,357 N $391,495 317,255 $31 7,2ss 74,240 $74,240
22 2017 A&B
Refunding
Bonds Trustee
Service
Fees 06/30/
2017
06/30/2038 Bank of
New York
Trustee
Service
Fee
85,800 N $4,000 4,000 $4,ooo $-
23 sB 1029
Reporting
Seruice
Professional
Services
01t11t
2018
ozJ28t2038 Urban
Futures
sB 1029
Annual
Reporting
Service
8,730 N $41 0 $- 410 $41 0
24 Annual
Disclosure
Professional
Seruices
02t011
2018
o2l2al203a Urban
Futures
20174 &
2O17BTax
Revenue
Refunding
Bonds
Annual
Disclosure
Reporting
43,500 N $2,1 00 $- 2,100 $2,100
25 2017 A&B
Refunding
Bonds
Arbitrage
Rebate
Services
Professional
Seruices
12t21t
2005
02t28t2038 Willdan
Financial
Services
Arbitrage
rebate
calculation
services
lor 2017A
and 20178
Bonds
19,063 N $- $- $-
28 2017A&B
Tax Allocation
Reserves 06/30/
2017
12t0111935 Bank of
New York
2017 A &
B
659,000 N $659,000 $- 659,000 $659,000
an - Jur
$- $- $- $799,s1' $1 25,000 $924.511
A B c D E F G H I J K L M N o P o R S T U v w
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Other Bond
Item
#
Project Name Obligation
TYPe Date
Agreement
Date
Payee Description POect
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
23-24
Total Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance RPTTF AdminRPTTF
23-24A
Total Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF AdminRPTTF
23-24f3
Total
20'17A&B Tax
Allocation
Refunding
Bonds
Reserve Cash
Flow Shortfall
Replenishment
29 RPTTF
Shortfall
06/30/
2021
0613012024 Bank of
New York
Cash Flow
Shortage
due to
19-20
ROPS &
17-18 PPA
Overdraws
417,810 N $417,810 417,810 $41 7,810 $-
ROPS 23-244 (Jul - Dec) ROPS 23-248 (Jan - Junl
Refunding
Bond Debt
Service
Reserves
Refunding
Bond Debt
Service
Reserves
Tehachapi
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedu!e (ROPS 23-241- Report of Cash Balances July 1,2020 through June 30,2021
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safely Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopmenl Pmpedy Tsx Trust Fund (RPTTF)msy bo lisl€d as a source of paymenl on lhe ROPS, bul only rc $e extent no olh€r tunding source is available or when payment from pmperty tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligalbn.

A B c D E F G H
ROPS 20-21 Cash Balances
(07101120 - 06/30/21)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12t31t10
Bonds issued
on or after
01101t11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07l01l20l
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution
amount.
400,578 627,973 171,832 E1: from ROPS 22-23 "Report for Cash Balance" G4
2 Revenue/lncome (Actual 06/30/21 )
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 20-21 lolal
distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
2,619 516,574 G2: RPTTF Received in2O-218 $516,574;
20-21A= $0 F2: lnterest lncome in20-21
$2,619
3 Expenditures for ROPS 20-21 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/21)
627,973 2,619 415,423 E3: $627,973 of debt service payment in 20-21 was applied against the reserved
balance
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/21) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
400,578 689,973 G4: ROPS 20-21 llem #28, $631,302 reserve for December 2021debt service payment +
$40,230 19-20 PPA for 22-23 ROPS +
$18,441 18-19 PPA for 21-22 ROPS
5 ROPS 20-21 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 20-21 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
No entry required 820
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/21)
G to F = (1 + 2 -3 -4), G = (1 + 2-3 -4 - 5)
$- $- $- $- $(417,810) Funding shortfall to be recovered with ROPS 23-24A ltem 29
Tehachapi
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-241- Notes July 1,2023 through June 30,2024
Item # Notes/Comments
5 20
21 22
23 24
25 28 December 2023 Debt Service Payments
29 Balance resulting from 2017 Refunding Bonds was double drawn down from 17-18 PPA as well as ROPS 19-20A&B using reserve balances

TEHACHAPI

CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL REPORTS
MEETING DATE: JANUARY 17,2023 AGENDA SECTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

APPROVED

CITY MANAGER

DEPARTMENT
TO
FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT

HONORABLE MAYOR DAVIES AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

JAY SCHLOSSER, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
DECEMBER L2,2022
PUBLIC HEARING: TEHACHAPI RED APPLE TRACT ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PIAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, GENERAL PIAN AMENDMENT 2O22-OT, PRE-ZONE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY TO C.3, AND ANNEXATION NO. 86
BACKGROUND:

On January 3,2022, the City of Tehachapi received an application to annex the property known as the Tehachapi Red Apple Tract, located at 21501 Tucker Road (Project), from Kern County into the City. The site is approximately 10.7 acres in size, with approximately 2 acres consisting of a single-family ranch residence and the remaining 8.7 acres consisting of undeveloped land. No development is currently proposed for this site.

The City determined that this annexation (No. 86) will involve a General Plan land use designation change involving the project site to be amended from Rural General to Commercial. The site will be pre-zoned to the City's zone of General Commercial (C-3). These amendments will maintain consistency with the General Plan and pre-zoning, as required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) for processing.

This Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment A) describes all the actions being considered to allow the project proponent to annex this property into the City within a commercial zoning district. The actions include the following:

1. EIR Addendum - Recommend the City Council review and consider the analysis in the Addendum to the previously Certified EIR for the 2012 City of Tehachapi General Plan prior to making a determination on Annexation No. 85.

3. Pre-zone to commercia! (C-3) - lntroduce and adopt an ordinance of the City Council to pre-zone the subject property to General Commercial (C-3) zone

4. Annexation No. 85 - Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution of Application to Kern LAFCo for the annexation of Tehachapi Red Apple Tract from Kern County into the City of Tehachapi.

F;l
: I

2. General Plan Amendment 2O22-Ot - Recommend the City Council change the land use designation of the portion of the Red Apple Tract from "Rural General" to "Commercial." Annexation No.85
January 17,2023
The supporting details for each of the above actions are contained in the attached Planning Commission Report from November 14, 2022. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 22-09 in support of the actions as presented by Staff.

RECOMMENDATION:

Subject to the testimony received during the public hearing, staff recommends the above actions be undertaken:

ADOPT A RESOTUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAP! APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022.01 AND FINDING THAT NONE OF THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED !N CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL qUAUTY ACT SECTION 15162 CALLING FOR A SUBSEqUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT OR NEGATIVE DECTARATION HAVE OCCURRED SUCH THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

IS NECESSARY

INTRODUCE, BY TITLE ONLY, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AMENDING

THE CIW OF TEHACHAPI ZONING CODE TO PREZONE THE PROPERW LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF

TEHACHAPI,S SPHERE OF INFTUENCE

CITY OF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF TEHACHAPI AMENDING THE CITY

OF TEHACHAPI GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the provisions ofthe City of Tehachapi Zoning Code, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council consider amending its General Plan to change the land use designation for the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (the 'oAnnexed Area") from "Rural General" to "Commercial"; and WHEREAS, the City is in the process of annexing the Annexed Area and prezoning it Commercial (C-3); and
WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan amendment was reviewed under the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by an addendum (the "Addendum") to a previously Certified Environmental Impact Report for the 2012 CiIy of Tehachapi General Plan EIR and concluded that none of the conditions described in CEQA Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration had occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI as follows:

L That all of the foregoing findings and recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

2. That the General Plan of the City of Tehachapi is hereby amended by changing the land use designation of the Annexed Area from "Rural General" to "Commercial.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tehachapi, Califomia on the day of
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
2023, by the following vote

NOES COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
I
CITYOF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
MICFIAEL DAVIES, Mayor of the City
of Tehachapi, California
ATTEST:

TOzu MARSH, City Clerk
of the City of Tehachapi, California
2 CITY OF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT ..A'
[Annexed Area]
J

CITYOF

TEHACHAPI

I-EGAI- DF,PARTMENT
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AMENDING THE

REGULATING PLAN OF THE CITY OF

TEHACHAPI ZONING CODE TO PREZONE

PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF

TEHACHAPI'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the provisions ofthe City of Tehachapi Zoning Code, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council consider annexing the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made apart hereof (the "Annexed Area") which is within the City's sphere of influence and pre-zone the Annexed Area to be Commercial (C-3); and WHEREAS, the proposed action was reviewed under the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by an addendum (the "Addendum") to a previously Certified Environmental Impact Report for the 2012 City of Tehachapi General Plan EIR and concluded that none of the conditions described in CEQA Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration had occurred; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recorrunended annexation of the Annexed Area and pre-zone of the Annexed Area to Commercial (C-3); and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Planning Commission findings and recommendations and makes the following findings:

1. All required notices have been given for this hearing; and The provisions of CEQA have been followed; and
The proposed pre-zoning is consistent with the City's General Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEHACHAPI DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

1. All of the foregoing findings and recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

2. The Addendum for this pre-zoning action is hereby approved and adopted.

3. The Regulating Plan of the City of Tehachapi's Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by pre-zoning the Annexed Area to Commercial (C-3) and extending the 2 J
I
CITYOF

TEHACHAPI

I-EGAI- DEPARTMENT
boundaries of its Regulating Plan to include the Annexed Area which is presently within the City's sphere of influence.

SEVERABILITY
Each of the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. If any provision shall be declared to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby but shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT.

The City Council has approved the Addendum for the project.

Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its passage and within fifteen (15) days of its passage shall be published in any manner authorized by law in the Tehachapi News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Tehachapi.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tehachapi, California on the day of 2023
PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tehachapi, Califomia on the day of
AYES: COLINCIL MEMBERS:
2023, by the following vote:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL ME,MBE,RS:

MICHAEL DAVIES, Mayor of the City
of Tehachapi, Cal i fornia
ATTEST:

TORI MARSH, City Clerk
of the City of Tehachapi, California
2 Section 2.

CITY OF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
I hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council ofthe City of Tehachapi at a regular meeting thereofheld on 2023.

TORI MARSH, City Clerk
of the City of Tehachapi, California
Published
1 -)

CITY OF
TE}IACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT "A"
[Annexed Areal
4 TEHACHAPI

CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL REPORTS
MEETING DATE: JANUARY t7,2023 AGENDA SECTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

APPROVED

DEPARTMENT

CITY MANAGE

TO HONORABLE MAYOR DAVIES AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JAY SCHLOSSER, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
JANUARY LO,2023
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 19.06.753 AND TEHACHAPI MUNtctPAL CODE SECTTON 15.04.150
DATE:

SUBJECT:

BACKGROUND
The State of California has adopted a new set of building construction codes as contained within Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, also known as the lnternational Codes. This update process occurs approximately every three years and was most recently performed in January 2022. The State correspondingly requires that local agencies enact and enforce these new codes beginning January 1 of the following year (ln this case January I,2023).

Furthermore, local agencies are granted the authority to add to the State codes. Kern County undertakes this effort in each cycle and the City has traditionally followed the County in order to provide consistency for the benefit of property owners and contractors operating within the County. ln order to achieve this goal, we must amend municipal code section 15.04.160 to reflect the new county ordinance as it relates to the adoption of the County-level building codes.

RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE ClW COUNCIL ADOPT, BY TITLE ONLY, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIW COUNCIL OF THE CIW OF TEHACHAP! ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. G.9179 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE couNw oF KERN, STATE OF CALTFORNTA AMENDTNG CHAPTERS 17.04 L7.06, L7.O8, L7.tO, t7.L2, 17.t6, L7.2O, t7.24,t7.25,L7.28,17.32,17.34,17.36,L7.4O,17.4,L7.$,AND 17.56 OFTtTtE L7 OF THE ORDTNANCE CODE oF THE COUNTY OF KERN CONCERNTNG BUtLD|NG REGUIATTONS - GENERAL RESTDENTTAL CODE, BUtLD|NG coDE, GREEN BUtLDING STANDARDS CODE, MECHANTCAL CODE, HOUSTNG CODE, PLUMBING CODE,

ELECTRTCAL CODE, EXISTING BUILDING CODE, GRADTNG CODE (AS REVTSED HEREINAFTERI, FIRE CODE, wtLDIAND URBAN TNTERFACE CODE, DANGEROUS BUttDtNGS CODE, BUtLDtNG RELOCATION, MOBILE HOME

AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FLOOD PIAIN MANAGEMENT CODE, AND ENERGY CODE AND AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 753 OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI AND TEHACHAPI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION

15.04.150

CITYOFTEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIW COUNCIT OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAP! ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. G-9179 OFTHE BOARD OFSUPERVISORS OF

THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTERS !7 .U, L7 .06, 1 7. 09, 17 .LO, L7 .12, L7 .L6, L7 .2O, 17 .24, t7 .26, t7 .29, L7 .32,

17.U, 17.16, L7.N, 17.4, 17.8, and 17.55 OF TITIE 17 OF THE

ORDINANCE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF KERN CONCERNING BUITDING REGUTATIONS. GENERAL RESIDENTIAT CODE, BUITDING CODE, GREEN

BUITDING STANDARDS CODE, MECHANICAL CODE, HOUSING CODE,

PTUMBING CODE, ETECTRICAT CODE, EXISTING BUILDING CODE, GRADTNG CODE (AS REVTSED HERETNAFTER), FIRE CODE, WttDtAND

URBAN INTERFACE CODE, DANGEROUS BUITDINGS CODE, BUITDING

RETOCATION, MOBILE HOME AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FTOOD PI.AIN MANAGEMENT CODE, AND ENERGY CODE AND AMENDING
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 753 OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAP! AND TEHACHAPI MUNICIPAT CODE SECTION 15.04.150
THE CIW COUNCIT OF THE CITY OF TEHACHAPI DOES ORDAIN AS FOTTOWS:

Section 1. AMENDING ORDINANCE
The City Council previously adopted Ordinance No. 19-06-753 on November 18, 2019 which became effective thirty (30) days thereafter in which it adopted by reference the 2019 edition of the California Building Standards Code known as the California Code of Regulations. ln order to obtain consistency with the County of Kern, California, the City Council wishes to adopt by reference Ordinance No. G-9179 adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kern on November 08,2022. This ordinance shall be effective as of January t,2023. To the extent the codes adopted in Board of Supervisors Ordinance No. G-9179 as adopted herein amend or othenrrrise revise those adopted by the City Council in Ordinance No. 19-06-753, this Ordinance shall supersede Ordinance No. 19-06-753 and the revisions or amendments in Ordinance No. G-9179 as adopted herein shall be controlling.

Section 2. AMENDMENT.

Section 1 of Ordinance No. 19-06-753 and Tehachapi Municipal Code Section 15.04.150 are hereby amended to read as follows:
"15.04.16GAdoption of uniform codes. Ordinance No. G-9179 of the Board of I

CITYOFTEHACHAPI

LEGALDEPARTMENT
Supervisors of the County of Kern, State of California which amends Chapters 77.O4,17.06, t7.o8, L7.tO, t7.L2,17.76,17.20, L7.24, L7.26,77.29, L7.32, L7.34, t7.36, L7.40,77.44,

77.48, and 17.56 of the Ordinance Code of the County of Kern adopting the following uniform codes (or portions of same) is hereby incorporated by this reference into the Building Code of the City of Tehachapi: Building Regulations - General, Residential Code, Building Code, Green Building Standards Code, Mechanical Code, Housing Code, Plumbing Code, Electrical Code, Existing Building Code, Grading Code (as hereinafter revised), Fire Code, Wildland Urban lnterface Code, Dangerous Buildings Code, Building Relocation Code, Mobile Home and Accessory Structures, Floodplain Management Code, and Energy Code. All amendments and repealers of the foregoing Chapters by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kern hereinafter adopted by the Board of Supervisors shall be automatically incorporated herein without further action of the City Council."
Section 3. REVISIONS TO GRADING CODE
Attached as Exhibit "A" and by this reference made a part hereof are the City's revisions to the Grading Code which shall be effective in the City of Tehachapi in place of the Grading Code adopted under Ordinance No. G-9179 by the Kern County Board of Supervisors.

Section 4. CATIFORNIAENVIRONMENTATOUATITYACT.

This ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEAA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines and is not a project which has the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The adoption of the Ordinance is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(bX3) of the California Code of Regulations.

Section 5. SEVERABIIITY.

Each of the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. lf any provision shall be 2 CITY OF TEIIAC1IAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
declared to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby but shall remain in full for and effect.

Section 6. EFFECflVE DATE.

The publication requirements for this ordinance shall be met in accordance with Government Code 5506 and [email protected] and this Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its passage.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tehachapi, California on the 19ft day of December 2O22.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tehachapi, California, on the 17th day of January 2023,by the following vote:

AYES:

NOE:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Mayor of the City
of Tehachapi, California
ATTEST:

TORI MARSH, City Clerk
of the City of Tehachapi, California
I hereby certifo that the foregoing Ordinance No. XX-XX-XXX was duly and regularly adopted by the City Councilof theCityof Tehachapiata regularmeetinghereof heldonJanuary 17,2023.

TORI MARSH, City Clerk
of the City of Tehachapi, California
a
-)

CITY OF TETIACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Section 1 1. Chaptgt 17.28,Title 17 of the Ordinance Code d the County of Kem, b hereby ripeateO; and a neur Chapter 17.28, TiUe 17 of the Ordinanoe Code of the Ciunty of Kem, is her$y added to read as bllowB:

CHAFTER 17.28

GRATXNG CODE

EXHIBIT'A'
Purpe.

Shorttide.

Scope.

Permitr nqulrcd.

Hezardr.

Dcfinltionr.

Gredlng pemlt rrqultrmentr.

Grrdlng fieea.

Bondr.

Cutr.

F[b.

Sctbrcb.

Dnlnrge rnd brrrclng.

Erodoncontrol.

Dnlnege lrbnton hcllltlee.
ileinbmnco.

Gndlng lnlpecton.

Complcton of work
Secdom:
r7.2t.0{0

17.28.0m

17.4.0:10 ,7.4.N
r7.8.050

17.4.060
fi.n.070

17.28.080

17.28.000
17-B.lO0

17.8.1{0

17.8.1N i.a.L0 fl.n.18

17.28.150
fl.?f,,lw

77.A.fiO
t7.28.1E0
fl.B,A1O PutPoce.
i;1g trrp*" U irfr ctrap6r b to s#guard tib, limb, property and the public vuettarc 6y regutating gndirq on pdvata property'
fi.28.A2A Short60e.

This chapter may be citsd as the "Kem CounU Grading Code." The standards listed belor are recognized standards'
A. Testing: 1. ASTM D 1557, Moisture-density Relations of soilg and soil Aggregate Mixtures;

2.nsruDlss6,lnPlaceDensityofsoilsbytheSand-Cone
Methodi

17.28.030 ScoPe.
ii.r-it-ir,"pur s.tr'orttr rulee and regulations to conhol excaration, grding and eartfrwork consfiuction,- in"tuOing }il. and embankments; eatabliehes the adminbbatirre pro*oJri to, issdnce of permits; and provfites br approval of phns and inspection of gradirq oonstttction.
4 CITYOFTEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT

3. ASTM D 2167, ln Place Density of Soab by the RubberBalloon Method; 4. ASTM D 2937, In Phce Density of Soils by the Driv+ Cy'inder Method; 5. ASTM D AgU an<t D 3017, ln Place Moisture Contact and Density of Soils by Nuclear Methods.

77.8.W Prmltr nqulnd. A. Except as specilnd in subs€ction 17.28.VA.B of fiis dtapter, no porson shall do any grading or causo the same to be done wihout first having obtairpd a grading pomitfrorn the building fficial. B. Exempbd Wo*: 1. When approved by the building fficial, gradiltg in an isolated, selfonhined aroa if the buiEing offidd finG fiat no dangpr b private or public property can now or hereder rasult ftorn he grading operations; 2. An excavEtion belour finish€d grade br bascments and fuotings of a building, retaining wall, or offier stucture authoriad by a wlid building permit. This shall not exempt any lill mads wtth $e mfrrhl fronr sucfi excavation nor exempt any excarralion having umupporbd hepht greater than fivo fuet der tha completion of such sfructtro;

3. Cemebrygraves; 4. Refuse dispocal sibs contolled by offier regulations:

5. Excavations fur rrells or tunncls or utiliEes; 6. Mining, quarrying, excarrating, proceosing, etodgiling of rock, 8and, grawl, aggregate, or chy where established and provided 6r by law, provided sucfr opentbng do not aftct the lateral aupport or increase the stesses in or prcaoure upon any adjaoent or contiguous property;

7. Eploratory excavations undsr the direc[bn of soil erpinecrs or enginaering geologists;
8: An excarration for a buiHing gite wtticfi: (a) ac 168 than tuo (2) ft6t in depth, or (b) $fiicfi does not clgsto a ort slope graabr than five (5) het in heQht and sbeperthan one and one-half ( 1n) unib hodzontal to one (1) unit vertical;

9. Alillrtfiicfi does not exeed fifry (50) anbb yards on any one site whlch ie: (a) leeg than one (1) bot in depth and plaed m natunl bnain with a slope flattar than frve (5) units horizontal to one (1) unit vertical, or (b) bsi than three (3) bot in depth and not inbndod to aupport gtnctures;

10. Accepbd agriculural adivitbs, induding routine mowing, ptowing, ditcting, hanowing, dlsking, ruging, lenellng, and oftsr clmilar bperations necsssary to prepare a field or crop for Productbn; ' 11. Accapbd oilfield ac'tivities related to oilfiold drilling, gtdr as oilfield roeds, drilling pads, and sumPs ueed fur dfilling mud, and grsgutg required for the settirU of produciion equipment. Thb doa not irdude 5 CITYOFTEHACHAPI

I-EGAL DEPARTMENT
access roads which lead from the public righbof-way 9 m9 sip of -me
oilfield aaivity anA are coversd under paragraph 12 of subseciion

17.28.040(8);

12. 'Access
roads with cxJt and fill slopes tess than tlrc (2) feet in heigttt
Btemption from the permit requirernentB of qb cfraP-br ehall not be deefn€d to ghnt authorization for any grading vqidt modtfia or obstructs a natrraldrainage coutso wiUrout a grading permit'

17.28.050 Hezeds.

Whenerer the building offcial determines that any existing -excavation or embankment or fill on irivate property has becorne a hazard to lib and limb' or inO"ng"t" property, or aOverialy afiiAs the safuty, u8e or stability of a publb *t-;;-d;ilagi Adnnel, tre ouner of the proPgq upon whid1 the excavatbn or fill i8 bcatad, ir other Pergon or agent in $ntrot of sak, Property' upon reccipt of noti* in rvriUng fom tire buitding 6'ffictat, shallwi[rin Ut€ Pqiod spccified $or.ln r"pair or elimiriate euch exca\rati6n or embankmeril 30 a8 to elfininate thc hazad ariO Ue in conformane with the rsquirements of x,tb cfiapter. ln the event trat any excanation or embankmont orfillwas accomplbhal wihout oOtalning the required grading p€rmit and was existing at the time ownership cfranged- br tre bropefty upon irtrictr the excarration or fill b bcabd, or d tP tme irpttrer person or igdnt came into controt of eaid property, lt- 1ttgll b€ fie responsibility
'of the new olYner, person or agOnt ti,ho b maintalning the ex&,ratitrn & Rtt to obtain the proper gradang pormil and remedy any conditons orviolations whir:h do not comply with this cfiapter.

17.2E.060 Dollnltlonr.

For the purposes of this cfrapter the dsfinitibns lhited heraunder shall be conshrcd as specifted in this seciion. '1. "Approval" means the propoeed work or cornpl&d work conhrms to this cfiapter in the opinion of the building orfficial.

Z. ' 'Architecf rneans a professional arcfiibct, registered in the Stab b practice in the field of architec'turc. ' 3. 'As-Graded" means the extent of surface conditbns on cunpldion of grading

4. 5.
'B€drocf m@ns inalaoe solid rock.
"Bench'means a rehWety lerral step excavabd inb earth mabrial on wtridt ftll b to be Phced. 6. "Bonuilr'means earfr materialacquired from an off-sib location fur use in grading on a site. i. -.Ciyil Engineer'' m@nE a profecsional engineer regieterad in the SteE of Calibmia to praciice in the field of cMl rvorks.

B. ,Chril dgineering' mean8 the appliration of the knorledge of $e forcee of nature, plindplos ofhectranics and the propertiea of materiab b he 6 CITY OF TEI{ACHAPI

LECAL DEPARTMENT
eraluation, deign and construdion d civil ruorks for the b€noficial uses d mankind. 9. 'Compactbnu maans the densification of a fill by mechaniel meana.10. 'Earth Matcrial" m6,an3 any rock, natural aoil or tlll and/or any combination h€rgof. 11. 'Enginearing Geologisfl meens a gpolggist elperbnced and knorledgeable inlngineering gpology, rcgisterd in the Stab of Calihmh.

12. "Engin&ring G"obg,l means the application of geologic fnoryl"Oge anO
-prinapt& in thi- inrleatigqtioq an{ evaludion d naturally occuning rock and soil br uso in the daign of dvilwo-rks'

15. 'Erosion" lnsens the ruearing avay of ttre ground aurface as a result of the mowment of wind' water ard/or ice.

14. 'Excavation' nEang he meclranbal ramoval of er0r m&riab.

15. 'Exicting Grad6' m€ans the grade prior to g"$lng'

16. "Filr m&ns a depooit of eartn maErial phoed by artificlal mean!.

17. 'Finigh Grade" nreane the final gnade of fie site whicfi coniormg b the approved Phn. ' '18. ;Geotectrnical Engineer." Sce "Soib Engincer"

19. "Grade" means the rortical locafpn of tp grourd suilecs. 2A. "Grading" means any excavating or filting or.combinaticn thereof' 21 ileans a O&bneO compacoa fifi-phed in a tsandt
excarmO in eartir material beneath Ue toe of a propooed fill "top". 22. "prodinnat inspcction" m€ang the insp€dion required.by 9tb cfrap6r to b€-petd;d Oi te cMl.enginaer, solq erpineer or enginering i[[6igt Srch inipianni inarOe.thd-perform"O !V persort3 ruperviscd by iu*r lrgineets ot giobgiatE anO ghall be iumcient to form an opinion datirq b the oonductof rvork. -'- - ig. ,Registered C;eo&rgiaf means a greologiet t€gierod in the Stab to practice in 0refeld sf qsolgqY.

21. 'Rougn 6taO"Tme"ns the stage at srhicfi the grade approximetely conforms to the aPProred Plan.
2A. .site" r;;;i anv bt or parcet of land or contiguoue .oTyrton thereof, under the sa;;';,rr1€f8hh, wtr'era gradirU I p.fnTd or permitbd' . .

ZO. "Stopo' rnene an indind gro-und ?.rqT theindination of wtidt ie ",pro."o
as a ratio of horizontal distance to vartical dbtance.
27- "soir rneans natrratly occuning superfrcial deposiB overlying bed rock. 28. 'soib Engineer (Geotechnical Engineer)" In€am an erlgineer "rp"ri"*"6 and [ni*r"og""or" in the praetics of sdls erlgiruering (gootecfi nical) engineering'

29. "soits'-E;gineering (Geotecfrnicat Engineering)'. meery .I" applicatiqn of the princiiafs ot.L$ mecfianics in the investpgtion' evaluation and design of civilGtkiinvotving ttre usa of earth materbb and the inspection inOlortdting of the construdion thereof'
7 CITYOFTEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT

30. "stockpike" means an a@umulation of loose ear$ matBrhl (sfiorago pile) generated during grading operations. 31. 'Tenace'tneans a relatively level step onstucted in tte face of a graded slope surface for drainage and maintananoe Purposes.

17.28.070 Gnding permltmquinmentr.

A. Permits Required. Except as exempted in Section '17.28.UA of thb chapter, no person, fim, corporation, own€r of land, or possessor shall do any grading without first obtaining a grading permit ftom the buiHirg orfidal. A separate permit shall be required for each site and may oover bofi excavations and fills. Adjacent sites being graded as one (1) integrated poFct may be considered as one (1) site for purposes of this sac{ion.

All permits will include the provisions that the applicanq hts agonts, conbacton, or employees shall carry out the proposed rvork in accordance wih he approved plans and speciftcations ard in complhnce wi$r all the rsquirernenb d hb chapter and other County and Strate laws wtrictr mpht be applicable. No approval shall exonerate the permittee or his agents from the responsbility d cqnptyirU with $e provisions ard intent of this chapter. B. Application. The provisions of Chapfier 17.U,17.00 and 17.08 arc applicable to grading and, in addition, the application shall be acompanied by or include: 1. The estimated guantitbs and type of material to be graded, excavated, or filled, sufficient to esilablish bes. C. Grading Designation. Grading in exoess of llp-sereand (QB00fhree hundred (300) cubic yards shall be perfonrnd in accordance wiUt the approved gnading phn prepared by a civil erpineer or arcfiibct, and shall be desQnated as "engineercd grading.' Grading involving less than tre-SsssanC (2{eQftree hundred (300) cubic yards shall be deeignated "regular grading" unbss the permittee chooses to have the grading perfunrod c engkpercd grading, or the building offcial debrmines that special conditirng or unusual hazards exist, in which case grading shall conbrm to the requioments br engineered grading. D. Engineered Grading Requirements. Applicatbn for a gradiq permit shall be accompanied by trro (2) sets of plans and specificatirns, and supporting data consisting of a soils engineering report, ergirurirg geobgy report, engineering calculations and drainage computatkrns. The plane, specifications and calculations shall be preparcd and signed by an indivUtnl licensed by the State to prepare such plans or specifications ufien required by the building offcial.

Specifications shall contain infomation covering conetruction and material requirements. Plans shall be drawn to ecale upon subotantial paper or doth and shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the nature and extent of tho wort proposd and shor in detail that they will conform to the prwisions sf thb chapter and all relevant laws, ordinanoes, rules and regulations. Th€ lirst sh€st of each set of plans shall give the location of the nork and the name and addrass of the owner and the person by whom they were popared.
8 CITY OF TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
The phns shall irrclude the follouring information:

1. Generalvicinity of tte proPoced gite;

2. Property limits-and aecurate contours of existing ground and detaib of tenain and area drainage; 3. Limiting dimensionl, obvations or finbh contours to be actrieved by ttre grading, and proposed drainage dtannels and raHed construction; 4. Detai6d plans of all surface and subsurfiace drainry devices, ualls, cribbing, dams and other proteciive devices to be construcbd wi[r, or as i part of, the proposed work toge&er wi[t a map showing the dninag€ arei and the estimated runoff of the area selved by any drains; S. Location of any buildings or structures on the Ploperty where tre rvork is to be perbnned and he location of any buildir[s o1sffu{ures on land of adia&nt owners srhich are within fuan (15) bet of tho property orutriih may be aftg6d by the pPpg6ed grading operations;

6. Recoruirsrdations induded in the soib cngineering ]€port and the engineerirq geology rePort shall be incorporated il tlc gradirp ptans or specmc*iinl. t1y1itn approved-by the. building ofidal, .pftf" 'rccommenOatlons contained in'thc soils engincerirg r€polt ard thg engineering g"ology lepott, sfiich are applicable to gnding, may be induded bY refurene; 7. The dafu of the soib engineoring and engineering geglogy repofts togpther with the names' addresscs and phone numbers d the firms or individuals wtro prepared the report'
E. Soile ingineefnd niport. fne ioit engineering report reguired by suOeeaion (D) of nU Laion JtrattinOuae data rcgarding the natr.rra, disffibutbn, ;d-rfr"r,g11}t'of exieting soils, condusions and
-reconrmardafione for grad-ing
;;Jrd anO aabn-crit ri" for coneciirre measunBs, including buttreee fills' wtren neoessary,
"nO'opinlon
covering adequacy ofgitee 16 b€ developed by the
il;*"d gradirg, ;a;h'"ed by soi6 engirnering fac{ors, induding tta stability of slopes.
required UV suUifion t6l otUrf-ilaion shallinclude an adequate deecription of td;*t"gy of the iG, .on"trsions and recommendations regardirg 1he. sfiEct of ;;66-'.onJition"
'on 6re propced development, and opinkrn and
reconrmendations covering me bOiqu,asy of sites to be derrebped by the proposed grading, as aftc'ted by qryogig.Fctoq
. . G. Lhn€facfi;; Shdy.-The Sui6ing fficialrnfl reegirc.a gsotecfinical inveetigation in accorOan"e wiUr Section 18Oa of the Building Code whcn, during ttr" ooilrr. of an iil"s6g"tion, both of t1g fo1owing conditions ara discovsad, the report shall address the pobntialior tiquefa{91t

1. Shallow ground water, ffiy (50) bet or leee'

2. Unconsolidated sandy allwium'
H. Reguhi er*ing Requiremlnts. Eacfi application br.a .gtding permit ghall be -""*rp"ni"i UV irc tZl scts of plana in sufficilrnt derity 19 9 CITY OF TETIACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
l0
indir:ate the nature and extent of work. The phns shall givc tre location of the ryork, the narne of the owner and the name of tho perEon who prepared the phns. The plans shall be drawn to scale ard include thefullowing:

1. Creneralvicinity of the propoeed eite;
Z. Propery limits and accurate contouo d existing gmund ard details of tenain aM area drainage; 3. Elevations, dimensions, location, sxtgnt, and the elops8 of all proposed grading shown by contou6 or other means and Proposed dnainage channels and rehted construction; 4. Detaited plans of all surfiace and subsurfiacs drainage devices, walls, oibbing, dams and oilter protec{ho devia to be onsfiucted with, or as a part d, the propooed wort toggther wltt a map showing the drainage a;Ba and the etimabd runofi of the area servsd by any dnains;

5. Locaticn of any buildirgs or structuroo on tho propcrty whcrc the work is to be perbrmed and the location of any buiHinge or ghJctut€s on hnd of adiacent wners rrtich are within tron (15) bd of $e proper$ or wtrich may be afrcted by the prcpced gradlng operations. l. The buiHing orfhcial may reguire that grading opera{ons and pnfed deelgns be modifted il delays oocur n'hich incur waather-generailed problems not consHerad at the time the p€rmit rtas issued.

The building oficlal may require proftosional inspedbn and testing by the soib engineer. When the buiHing orfficial has catne to bellew that geologic fac[ors may be involved, the grading wilt be requirad to confuin to engineered gradlng.

17.28.080 Gndlng be. A. General. A fee for each Grading Permit, induding rd&d plan ctrecking be, shall be paid to the buiHing orfficial, as established by the Boerd of Supervisors and as set by Board Resolution. B. Plan Checking Fees. When a plan or other dEta are raquired to be submited, a plan cfrecking fee shall be paid to the buiHirg fficial at the tine of submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan ched< fee shall be established by the Board of Supervisors and set by Board Rccolution. Separab plan check fees shall apply to ratraining walb or maior dninage fitctures m raquired in Title 17. For excavation and fill on the salne sib, the Ec shall be based on tre volume of excavation or fill, wtrk*rever is gmater. Where phns ara incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan cteckirg, an additional plandreck fee may be charyed. C. Grading Permit Fee. A fee for each grading permit shall be paid b the buiHing offcial as set forth by Kem County. Said grading permit be shall be established by the Board of Supervisors ard set by Board Reohnion. Separab pormb and bes shall apply to retaining walls or major drainage gtuuctur€s aS required in Title 17. There shall be no separate cfiarge br standard bnace drains and similar facilities.

CITYOFTEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
ll

17.28.m0 Bond..

The building ofiicial may require bonds in such form and amounts as may be deemed neesary to assure that the work, if not compbted in accordanoe wi[t the approved plans and specifications, will be conec'ted to eliminato hazardoue conditions.
tn lieu of a surety bond the applicant may ltle a cash bond or instrument of ct€dit wih the buildirg offchl in an amount equalto that hfiich rvou6 be required in the surety bond.
l7.2,lAA Cutr. A. Creneral. Unless otterwiee recommended in the approved soib engineering and/or engineering geology report, cuts shall conform to the povisions of $is section. ' B. Slope. The sbpe of cut surfam shall be no steePer than is SaE I Ortre intended uge and shall be no sGeperthan tre{2}three (3) uniE horizontal to one (1) unit wrtical unbss the applicant fumbhes a soils engirrering or al erqinsering geology report, or both, stating that the site has been invcetigated ani gMngin opinlon that a cut at a sEeper slope will ba stabb and not cra& a hazard to public or private property.
iXCfFHCmS+ 1: A efi curfaee mey be et a elepe ef 1,6 tpdpntalb 1 vergeal 1,1, lt ie net inbnced t€ suPPert Gtru€turee er eurehalgee= ie*,
C. Drainage and Tenacing. Drainage and bnac$ng thall be provited as required by Sec'tbn 17.28.134.
t7.28.110 Fllb. A. General. Unles otlerwise recommended in the aproved xtib engineering rcport, filla shall conbrm to the provisions of this section- ln tfie aO&nce of an apprwed soils engineering report, ftasa povisions may be waived br minorfilb not intended to support structures.

B. Fill Location. Fill slopes shall not be constructed on natural dopc I Eteeper than he(Z)three (3) horizontal unl$ to one (1) vertical unit. I - C. preiara6on of Ground. The grourd surface shall bo preparad to receive lill by renioving vegetation, noncomflying fill, lopsoil and other unsuihble materlals scirifying to proviOe a bond with ncnr ftll and, where slopee aro stoeper than fwe (S) ho-rizdntal units to one (1) vertical unit and he height b grc&r than n,re tSl fi"t, Uy benching into sound bedrcck or other competent rnabrial ae aeteilineO by the soils lngineer. The bencfi under the toc of fill on a slopc ;6p"; ttran ftve (5) horizontal unitE to ore (1) rlertical unit ahall be at least bn

CITYOFTEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
12 (10) feet wirJe. The area beyond th9 toe of ftll shall be sloped br sheet owrf,ow ;;; p";"d drain sfratt be pr6vided. When fill is to be plad over a cut, Sle boncfi unOdr the toe of the fill sirall be at least ten (10) feet wide, but tle crrt shall be ,"0. Uetore placing t1e fill and the cut shall be qualifted by the soils engineer or engineering g'eotogist or both as a suibble foundation brfill.

D. -Fill riaterial. Detimental amounts of organic mabrial shall not be permitted in fills. Except as permitted by the buiHing official, no rock or simihr I 'in"dfibt ratiA"f uA[r a maximum dihension greher trat (t6$J369 161 incfies shallbe buried or placed in ftlls.

EXCEPTIONS: The buiHing ofrcial may permit placenrnt ot larger_ rock when the soils engineer properv devise a In€&od of placernent, @ntinuously inspects its placennnt and approws the fill stability. The folloving conditions shall apply:

1. Prior to issuance of tre gnding permit, pobntial lock dispoeatareas shall be delineabd on thc grding phn'
Z. Rotf sizes greater than trvslw (12) incics.in. maximum dimension s[a[ be ten (10) feet or ror€ below gradc,
measurEd vertically.

3. Rocks shall be placed 80 as to assure lillirq of a[ rloide wiEl ulellgraded soil.

E. Compac.tion. Alt fills shall be compacied to a minimum of nlnoty (90) percent of maximum deneitY. F. Slope. The sbp6 of fill surfacas shall be no t16eRe.r than-b s& I Or tre inEnded use. Fill slopc shall be no steeper than hre{3)three (3) units horizontalto one (1) unit vertical. G. Draihige and Tenacing. Drainage and bnacirq shall be proviled as required by Sec'tion 17.28.130.

17.28im Setbeckr. A. General. Cut and fill slopas shall be set back ftonr sitE bordarbs in acordance with this sestion. Seback dhnensions shall be horizcntaldislencae measured perpendicular to the site boundary. Setback direnskrns shall be as shown in Figure 17.28-1.

B. - Top of Cut Slope. The top of cut slopes shall not be made neersr to a site boundary line than one fififr of the vertical height of crlt witl a minimum of tulo (2) Fet airO a maximum of ten (10) bet. The setback rnay need to be increased fur any required interceptor drains. C. Toa of Fill Slope. The toe of fill elope shall not bs mad€ nearcr to the site boundary line than one-half (1I2) the height of tfc slope_with a minimum of two (2) feet and a maximum of twenty (20) ftet. t/Vlrere a fill slope is to be located'near the site boundary and the adiacant off-sib prope$ is &velqed' special precautions shall Ue incorporded in the rvork as tha buiHing official d'eems riecessary to protect the acijoining property fronr damage as a result of such grading. Thesa precautions may indude but are not llmibd b:

CITYOFTEHACHAPI

LEGALDEPARTMENT
l3

1. Mditilmdseilbacks. 2. Provbbn br retaining or slough ualle'

3. Mechanical or chemical trcatnent of the fill sloPe surfaoe b minimize eroeion. 4. Prcvisions forthe con$ol of surface waters' D. Modiftcation of slope Location. The buitsing offichl may approtfa altemate sebacks. ftrJ builAiirg official may require an inrrectigation .and r"comrettOation by a qualifted erigineer or etpineering geologbt to dornons@ that the intent of this sec{ion has been sEtbfiod'

17.28.130 Dlllnrgo end bmclng'
A. eenerdi.- Unlees othenlisa indicated on the approved gndlng plan' drainage facilities
"nO
ti*.,ing shall conform to the provis-ions of x1b sectbn for crrt || iU ttopes steepet tran dree (3) units horizontal to (1) unit vertical' B. Tenace. Tenaoes at least six (6) fuet in widft ehall be e'tablbhed at not rrore than hirty tggl tmt vertical intervais on atl cut or fill sbpee O gonltl surfiie drainage anf-OiUris exceqtlhat where only one (1.) tenace is required' it ;ilat b";i.Ulrr"ig-fti. For
"ut
or'fill slopes grcamr qT."t'tv (60) hd and up b
one hurdrud twpntiiiZOie"t in wrticalhoi[ry, onc (1).brrace et spProxfingbry ,iO+"igt,fsnaU Ue ti66 (12) feet in w[m]Tenace wirrtrr and spacing br o11 and fiu Btop66 gr"afii Gir one hundred tutnty.(120).F"t in heigfit tha-ll.be iiilig;i.d by ; -.iri6;in""r and approved by-ttie.building ofnchl. Suibble ;;. strati Oe provirfeJb permit propor cleaning and mainbnanoe' Srales or ditches on t"*& shait hiw a minimum gt3{lent of fr'c (5) petcent and must Ue pawfi wmt t"intorced concrste not less than three (3) incfies. in thickness or an
"pprJ"O
equal pavirE. They shall h?y9 a minimum depfrt at$e
d;"6i pdni ot,ir.iri toot and.a miiimum paved.ry of fi,o (5) b€g A gingL'rirnof ewab or ditsh shall not oollec't runofifrom a tibutary area exceedirU tfririiln'g,ou-sano nve trunorcd (13,500) squars ca (proiaaeo) u,ihout dlscfrarging into a down drain'
- C. sunsLrface ot"inag". Cut and fill slopeo shall be provkled wt61 subsurfaco drainqe as neoassary for sAbility'
D. Dispdfi. nrrJrainago facilities-shall be despned to cany.rva6rs b the n€erest pr"aizut" drainage-ruay approved. by qte hrilding ofndd and/or il";6;rrpri.t" irrUi6on ,i" sefi pL'* to de.egsi! sucfi wetsrs' Erosion of ground in the "t""-oiJi""t"tgi
;h"ff Ui prevented by instalmion d non'erciue
dourUraing or otler devi€s.
ilitiitg p.dJ strati tratre a drainage gradient of two (2) Percent 51rard approved Gil;t'fi.dlities, unlcss uaiwd Uy tftt building fficial' EXGEPTIoNS:Thegradientftomthebuildirrgpadmaybel
p"ro"nt if all of the follivirp conditions exist throughd.rt he pcrmit alBa:
l.Noproposedfillsaregreaterthanbn(10)ftatinmaximum
depth.

CITY OF TE}IACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
14 2. No proposed finish cut or ftll slope faee have a vertiel hsaght in excess qf ten (10) tuot. 3. No existing slope faces, wtrich have a slope fae steeper than ten (10) units horizontally to one (1) unit vertically, haro a vertical height in excess of ten (10) 6et.

E. lnterceptor Drains. Paved interceptor drains shall be installed along the top of all cut slopes where the tribr.rtary drainage area abone sbp* toward the cut and has a drainage patr greater than forty (a0) bet rreasurcd horizontally. lnterceptor drains shall be paved with a minimum of thrce (3) inches of concrete or gunite and reinforced. They shall hav€ a minimum doptrr of trehrc (121 inches and a minimum paved width of $irty (30) incfiee rreasr.rrud horizontally acroas the drain. The slope of drain shall bc approvcd by ttre building official.
fl.n.10 Erooion control. A. Slopes. The faces of cut and fill slopes shall be preparcd and maintained to control against erooion. This confol may consist d eftdive phnting. The protection for the slopes shall be ingtallod aa soon a prffilc and prior to calling br final approval. where crrt Blopes are nd culian b erabn due to the ercion-resistant cfiara&r of the mabriab, sr.rcfi probc'tirn may be omitbd.B. Other Devices. Where neoossaty, cfi€ck dars, cdbbing, riprap or offier devbes or mefrrods shall be employed to onhol erosinn and prwue safsty.C. Temporary Devioee. Temporary drainage and ercion contol shal be provided as ndd at the end of eactr work day during greding opcrationE, such that exbting drainage channels nouH not be bbcked. Dust oonbol shell bs applied to all gnaded arcas and materiab and shall consist of applyirq w&r or another approved dust palliatirle for the allevhtion or preventirn of dutt nuisanco.

Deposition of rocks, earth materials or debris onto adiacent propody, ptblic roads or drainage channels shall not be allorred.

17.28.150 Dnlnegcrubntonfecllltc.

General. All drainage rctentiorVdetention fecilitirs and ttreir asocbbd conveyanoe facilfies shall be designed in accordanoe rvi8r trc l(er*€er$ gevdepmenCity of Tehachapi SuMivision and Developmant Stsrdante or ld ravision thereof.

17.28.100 ilelnbntnce.

The owner of any property on wtrich grading has boon perOrnreO pucuant to a pormit issued under the provisions of this ctrapter, or any o0rer person or agent in control of sucft property, shall maintain in good conditbn and repaii all drainage gtruc'tures, sumps ard other protectirre devices ehown on the grading plans filed with the applicdion for grading permit and approned ag a conditon precedentto the issuanoe d euclr permit.

CITYOFTEHACHAPI

LECAI- DEPARTMENT
l5
fl.?f,370 GndlnglnrPecdon. A. Genenal Al grading operations for which a permil b requircd shall be suliect to inspec'tion bylhe UuiHiirg orfficial. Profieeeional inspectbn of gradim ;pdti;.a ind tisting stritt oe prorid6d by the civil engineer, soils engineer and ure engineering geo6gist retained to provirte such seMces in accordance wiut SJU*&ion lt-Zana(e) br engineered gradirg and as requirad by he buildirB ofrchl for reguhr grading.

B. Cruif ingiieer. The civil engineer shall provkle profussional inspection within suArtnginee/s area of tedrnical specialty, rt'hich shall coneH of bbservation and reviei as to the establbhment of line, graqe and gurhce Ooi."g" oi t" development area. lf revised phns are required during the cours;of the work they itratt Ue prepared by the cMl engineer.

C. Soib inginesr. Thi soils engineer shall provitle profresional inepeciion witrin suctr-enginee/g araa. of technical special$, wtticft shal! include oUlrvatlon duringL g."Oi;g and testing for roquircd compac{ion' - .The 3ib
ir,gin "t snan proiUi sufficient oOservition during the preparatol of q". natural gr;und ana pdcement and cornpaction of tha filt to verify that such wott b boing iirformeA ih accordance with the conditkrns of the approrled plan and the ;ppr"pris requirenrntr of thie ctraptcr. Revised recorn6endatbns rolatim b "6nOni'ons
ditrehr€ fo, fte approveil soila enginee.nrySnd engineering g€ology r"p",t shall be iubmitted t6'Ure parmittee,-tre buiidirc fficial and the eivil engineer. -.e D. Engineering Geologist The engineeriry e.ntqi"t t$L.pgt'" profeasionat insfrc{bn i'ifrin eucn engineefg fuea.of tectrnlcal spociatty, s'hictl 5tt"trln.frO" prbrue"ional inspection & the bodrock excavaton to detemins if conditions encountlreO are in conformanoe with the approved repod. Revisod recommcndations refatirp to conditions diffiering from the approved cngineering geology Bport shall be submifred to the aoils engineer' E. perm-mi. itre permittce shall be rcsponsible br the rrcrk to be performed in accordance with the approved Plary and epeciffcations and in conformance wiUr irre prorisiona d ttfi'Ordinance Code, and tha permihe-sha1 ""gigi consultanG,-if rcquired, to prov6e profecsional inspec{ion8 on a.timety 5jia: rtre perminee snitt aa as a coordinator betrueen the conaultantE, the conUaaor anO Ute-UuitOing official. !n the event of cfranged ?ndryory' tt" pfiitb" shalt be reeponsiUte for informing the buiping offi611 d such change ind ehall provide revisod plans br approval'
F. Aui6ing Otrdal. The 6ui6ing official mayinspect x1e prqect at g1s various etagea of g,rirrc* requiring approiatto- determine that adequate conbol b being exercised by the probskrnal consultants'
b. Notiftcition of Noncompliance. lf, in the @u6o of tulfilling their rcsponsibillty unOeitrls chapter, tri c*vit engineer, the soib enginer' or the ;;dinedng'geofoeLiirds tti* th9 work ie not being done in conturmance with Utli "tt"pdt
6t Utiipproved grading pla1s, the discrepancies eha[ bo ]spofbd lmrneOld6fy in "ilifig to -the -p6rmittee and to ho bui6lng ofnda1 Recommerdations for conec{ive measurBs, if neoessary, shall abo be Submitbd'

TEHACHAPI

CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL REPORTS
MEETING DATE: JANUARY L7,2023 AGENDA SECTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DEPARTMENT H

CITY MANAGER

APPROVED
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR DAVIES AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JAY SCHLOSSER, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
DATE: JANUARY 9,2023
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 5714 ENTITLEMENT EXTENSION BACKGROUND:

Tentative Tract Map 67t4is a 74-lot single-family home neighborhood located west and adjacent to the Cherry Lane Estates bounded on the north by Cherry Lane and the south by Pinon Street. The tentative subdivision map was originally approved by the Tehachapi City Council on May 5, 2008. The City of Tehachapi granted three one-year extensions in May of 2070,2011, and 2012. Subsequently, various actions from the California legislature (SB 1185, AB 333, AB2O8, AB 116, AB 1303, and 481561)further extended the project entitlement to November 5,2022.

This project was first entitled by a company named Cardiff Equities, lnc. located in Gardena California. To our knowledge, it was purchased by Saticoy Developmenlin 2027 with an intent to advance the project to construction.

Since that purchase, Saticoy has actively advanced the project by working on the engineering elements including, but not limited to, Final Map, Grading, Drainage, Water, Sewer, and Street lmprovement Plans.

Saticoy applied for the Final Map in October 2022 asking for a short extension of time to the entitlement. ln consideration of the valid and timely application, City Staff agreed to advance the project setting a deadline of January 77 ,2023 for the date in which the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement must be before the City Council.

The original entitlement requires the applicant to seek the vacation of a flowage easement from the TehachapiCummings County Water District who owns the adjacent Antelope Dam. This issue has been known since inception and the developer produced a sizable hydrology report for review and approval from TCCWD in the summer of 2022 to affect a solution to this issue. This process is proving to take longer than expected.

PROPOSAL:

At this point, the delay preventing the completion of the Final Map and the advancement of the project lies with the review and approval of TCCWD relating to the vacation of an adjacent flowage easement. This review and approval is outside the control of the City and the developer. The developer has prepared the analysis required by TCCWD and continues to be responsive to the District's questions and comments.

As a result of this issue, the developer has requested a 6-month extension to the Tentative Tract 6714 Entitlement.

Attached is the letter requesting this consideration.

RECOMMENDATION:

APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM SATICOY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC TO EXTEND THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6714 PROJECT ENTITLEMENT FOR SIX MONTHS UNTIL IULY 17,2023
sATtcoY DEVELOPMENT COMAPANY, LLC
1746 - F South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, CA. 93003
805-525-6400 Office * 805-933-8040 Fax
December 6,2022
John (Jay) H. Schlosser, P.E.

Development Services Director
Tehachapi City Hall
I l5 S. Robinson Street
Tehachapi, CA 93561
RE: Tentative Tract Map 6714
Subject: 6-month time Extension Request.

Mr. Schlosser,
Saticoy Development Company (SDC) is optimistic and remains committed to the development of this project and the City of Tehachapi.

Currently we are in a plan review with COT for the improvement plans and tract map with the house plans to follow soon. To date we have paid over $ 174,000 for consultants and fees to entitle the tract.

We would be on track to record our map by this January 2023 except that Condition #6, page l6 of tentative map 6714 of the approved condition requires us to have TCCWD approval of a hydrology study for our improvements in the flowage easement, that traverses the northwest corner of the tract.

This study is evolving into a more extensive and time-consuming task than originally anticipated.

Unfortunately, for design sequence the hydrology study required the grading plan to be sufficiently completed to incorporate into the analysis which occurred this past spring.

Based on our current timeline below with TCCWD we anticipate it will take an additional 6 months to clear this condition.

Timeline with TCCWD
Grading Plan receives conceptual approval
LAV Hydrology Study to TCCWD
TCCWD Request Sl0K Deposit
Saticoy Pays TCCWD S10K deposit
LAV receives Comments from TCCWD Provost & Pritchard, dated 9ll5l22 LAV Submits Revised Hydro Report, Dated 1112012022
Sincerely,
Tim Finnigan
Saticoy Development.
7/U2022
711912022
81212022
81912022
912212022
121212022
a8
69 :I
iE
8 5E?b
4eeU
P!.Q -oqrl
?6;#
E :A ' G+''
3 I
?; E;3 I
En?{1il
3?!9EQ
E[*I:H
*
o
2 m
@
T
m
m
I
I
r
EFiEiZ 6x-;EEt
l-3i?E
E,les8d
e*lrIIi
EIi;;qT
;:;ciiH cr-':b'-{
x;is;i6
-aaff6Ea
: i:;;;6 -?82,='
r;eg3;$
iE?;II
E=ei
8 dB .6
!
:B et
t
5 Fv
-=
ds
-.. i:)
T
o
-t
z
if
,q
o
m
z
m
l
T
z
o
-t
m
a
l
t:i4
rl:r
;:!8
HH{:

E
ia;
]?s
:?q
i",i
r:3
*
--r-- M.B. 36. Fe.l89-r9l ,-
-
TUfr 4985
n
?
I
3 *
t
I
I
I
PM, AK 16, PG E?
i;:

YgE
ila
siYNA
q:h
6:
!i
I
ir
I
l
,>
.r
fll
a ,m
o
E
3 ,-Q
. rMq 49A5
' MB 36. PG Sg-r9' :
li
i
I
i
t
E
tsa
gi
E
I
I
i
l+:

I
I
=
m
o
m
z
i
z.
o
i
=
i
t
,Is
:p{
tr! <>
lB'
o
t
---------5
]I
t9
|a
i*
:]m,ir
ilI
t
t2
if;
I
o
:c
m
a
,
;8
*il
a1
noMT
$.
gI
oj
I
=Q
EA
ilf
*E
ri9r
=!D m -:tZ
rm'ir m
af,
mt
dl
t
6 @
il
m
-i
ffi
o
tx
T
i
iF4
ffi
N.
; lE'
-_-l:\.
"Er
.l
t!
ap
]I
=ii
srrt!.--
-->d'e
tl
,u
la
;iiE
la:e
rs'z;
t:
c
9 *
p
'l
I
Ir'
ii
;E
ft
t!
!l
-\
,a
!!
l,
S9
I
I
E
{
'I
I
r
!ii
ie!
.E
6c
it
ri
3 o
z
=I
3 -0
F-4i
I
i^-*-*-ll
ll+l
1t-i
lE:::::::::-
iF-:*:c ll.+
F-*!l
iF-l
r-l
t_i a
I Ai i
i lii
lu 11 'J'
I l: !18
*l
:i
&J
i#i
;--l
I
1,31 [ !g
r
" i"e
3si 3t I
I',
i:i t ia!
*v
Iri
-t
t1 I
n---)../
t.,r.
*. =:qia:
'
1112123,1:34 PM Export.png (1545x738)
https://maps.kerncounty.com/Geocortex/Essentials/REST/TempFiles/Export.png?guid=67ece2e6-2482-4043-afdS92cab9a9a16a&contentType=image.. . 1/1 !.r t I
rrt t E E H H E
-it
iril 'i
,#i.,
a
B
r:---
f
r:l l
I
Ei,,- :l
H
mir. i
*'ffi
H
I
I
h
ffi,E
:EI, ,
r*
r.T:ffi T
(E@

CITY OF

TEHACHAPI

CALIFORNIA
COUNC!L REPORTS
MEETING DATE: JANUARY L7,2023 AGENDASECTION: DEVELOPMENTSERVICES

APPROVED

CITY MANAGER

DEPARTMENT

TO HONORABLE MAYOR DAVIES AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JOHN (JAY) SCHLOSSER, DEVELOPMENT SERVTCES DTRECTOR DATE: JANUARY LO,2023
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT USER FEES UPDATE 2023

BACKGROUND
ln November 2019 Council adopted a resolution which implemented the Updated Fee Schedule for planning, engineering, and building services in relation to recovery of the City's costs for providing those services. The original User Fee Study examined fees for select City services using the full cost allocation hourly rates in combination with processing time estimates. lt largely focused on development services (Planning, Building, and Engineering) but included a minor Police component.

Over time, new scenarios have arisen which were not taken into consideration in the previous study and a regular review of the City's user fees is needed to ensure the fees were appropriate. Earlier this year City Staff contracted with Capital Accounting Partners, LLC to create fees for these new scenarios and review current fees.

REPORT RESULTS
Attached to this staff report is the final draft of the Development User Fee Update 2023. The report contains an update to the fees collected in the Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments. Further, the detailed list of fees contained in the report has been simplified and attached to this Staff Report to help display the existing and proposed fees.

The fees proposed are based upon a full cost recovery program. This means staff undertook extensive review and calculation to determine the actual cost to provide any given service. This task was undertaken to conform to the City Council's stated desire for "development to pay its way" in the City. The only circumstance in which staff believes full-cost recovery can be a concern is when it comes to minor permit services. ln these cases, if the cost for the service is high relative to the activity undertaken by a person or business, a full-cost fee could result in more people undertaking the activity without a permit. For instance, in the past, the City charged S20 for a Temporary Use Permit to install a temporary banner on a business. The actual cost to provide that service is 5L22. That said, S122 is in most cases more expensive than the banner itself. As such, City Staff recommends that the following permit activities be charged at the stated value in the following table (which is below the fullcost recovery sum):

Service # Fee Type Full-Cost Fee Proposed Fee
BS 43 Patio, Covered (0-250 SF) Sleo s100
BS 45 Patio, Covered Plan Check Srrz s7s
BS 80 Residential Electrical - sim ple Sleo sloo
BS 88 Residential Plumbing - simple s1s8 s10o
BS 96 Residential Mechanical - simple 5222 s110
BS 185 Ad minister Application (Encroachment) Srsa se0
BS 186 Asphalt Patch (<L00 sF) So+r S161*
BS 191 Residential Drive Approach Sezr s81*
BS 192 Sidewalk (<100 SF) S+oz S101*
BS 2OO Curb & Gutter (<20 LF) ss62 s141*
PL 16 Home Occupation Szog Sloo
PL 34 Reasonable Accommodation Sgoa Ssoo
PL37 Temporary Use Permit (Banners Only) 5722 Sgo
*Reduction lo 25Yo when work is improving existing infrastructure as opposed to simply replacing adequate infrastructure as determined by the City Engineer.

FISCAL IMPACT
The analysis from Capital Accounting Partners aggregated the total number of permits issued in Fiscal Year 21-

22. The report then compares what sum of money we should have captured with our existing fees against what we would have captured with the proposed fees.

RECOMMENDATION
ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIT OF THE CIW OF TEHACHAPI ADJUST!NG, EXTENDING, AND ESTABLISH!NG FEES FOR PIANNING, ENGINEERING, AND BUILDING SERVICES

CITY OF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAI DEPARTMENT
RESOTUTTON NO. _-23

A RESOTUTION OF THE CIW COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

TEHACHAPT ADJUSTTNG, EXTENDTNG, AND ESTABUSHTNG

FEES FOR PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND BUITDING

SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tehachapi ("City") has considered a report prepared by Capital Accounting Partners, LLC dated January 2023 (the "Report") which analyzed the city's fees (the "Fees") for planning, engineering, and building services in relation to recovery of the city's costs for providing those services; and WHEREAS, the Report recommended adjustments in the Fees which includes reducing and increasing some Fees, deleting certain Fees, and establishing certain new Fees as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (the "Development User Fee Update 2022"1; and
WHEREAS, the Report and all background data referenced in the Report were available for public inspection and review for a period of at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting; and WHEREAS, there are no written requests from interested persons for mailed notice of the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City wishes to adopt the Development User Fee Update 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tehachapi as follows:

1. That the foregoing recitals are true and correct.
1 CITY OF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT

2. That the fees described in Development User Fee Update 2019 are hereby approved and established and shall be effective from the date hereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tehachapi on as follows:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN
MICHAEL DAVIES, Mayor of the City
of Tehachapi, California
ATTEST:

TORI MARSH, City Clerk of the City of
Tehachapi, California
I hereby certifu that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Tehachapi at a regular meeting thereof held on TORI MARSH, City Clerk of the City of
Tehachapi, California
2 City of Tehachapi, CA
Development Services Department
Building, Engineering and Planning Fees
Single Family Home (new)
1-1200 SF $943 $1.001
Each additional500 SF $31 $32
Plan review SFH $685 $1,110
Single Family Home (addition)
1-200 sF $373 $403
Each additional 100 SF uB+e-+:ggSS $43 $45
ffi $43
Plan review SFH additien ${€4
Single Family Alt. (remodel)
1-200 sF $400 $415
Each additional 100 SF up+eJzOOSF $43 $45
Eaeh aCditienal 100 SF > 1200 SF $43
Plan review SFH remodel $1 84 $1 96
Duplicate Residential Housing Unit Permit Plan Check $351 $399 Multi-Family
First 5000 SF $1,995 $2,474
Each additional 1000 SF $322
First 5000 SF $1,591 $1,656
Each additionall000 SF $1 02 $161
Each additional story over two, add t hour inspection time for each story over 2 $1 23 $161 Commercial Shell
First 5000 SF $729 $749
Each additional 1000 SF $1 02 $1 07
Each additional story over two, add t hour inspection time for each story over 2 $1 23 $129 Commercial Tl
First 1000 SF $568 $61 2
Each additionall000 SF
Temporary power pole
102 107
Trash enclosure $94 $94
Re-roof $1 55 $1 58
Re reef reeever $#
Demolition $94 $94
Abatement $94 $94
Foundations (signs) $1 86 $1 58
Signs $1 25 $1 26
Modular homes permenant foundation $431 $448
Residential grading < 50 yards $94 $94
$94
Residential Electrical Fees
certified
Residential electrical - simple $1 00 $1 00
Residential electrical - complex $339 $431
Commercial Electrical Fees
Commercial electrical - simple $1 55 $261
Commercial electrical - complex $498 $866
C:\Users\paolozzi\Desktop\Development Services Master Fee List comparison DESCRIPTION FEE 2022 Proposed
Fee

BUILDING FEES

RESIDENTIAL
$307

COMMERECIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION

GENERAL FEES
s94 $94
$94
City of Tehachapi, CA
Development Services Department
Building, Engineering and Planning Fees
Residential Plumbing Fees
Residential plumbing - simple $80 $1 00
Residential plumbing - complex $21 6 $287
Commercial plumbing - simple $1 55 $222
Commercial plumbing - complex $492 $666
Residential Mechanical Fees
Residential mechanical - simple $80 $1 10
Residential mechanical - complex $21 6 $480
Commercial Mechanical Fees
Commercial mechanical - simple $1 55 $261
Commercial mechanical - $737
Door / Windows:

Up to 20 openings $1 55 $1 58
Each additional window $12 $13
Pati+Iattiee
0-250sF $50
:5{-SF€nd-qr€e+etr S+
Plan Review S5
Patio Covered
0-250 sF $60 $1 00
251 SF and qreater $31 $32
Plan review $45 $75
Pools / Spas
Each $279 $41 5
Pl€€-revier# $64
Walls
0-300 sF $1 88 $1 92
Each additional 150 SF $31 $32
Retaining Walls
0-300 sF $323 $415
Each additional 150 SF $31 $32
Landscaping
Landscape plan review - minor (<2500 SF) $383 $205
Landscape plan review - major (>2501 SF) $1,739 $379
$225 $1 37 -andscaDe olan review - residential
Short-Term Rental (new)
ihort-Term Rental Permit (lnitial) $1 52
Short-Term Rental Permit (Subsequent) $78
Photo Voltaic Solar Residental
Sinqle familv up to 9 KW $278 $287
Sinsle family each additional KW $10 $10
Plan review $1 84 $1 93
Photo Voltaic Solar Commercial
Commercial up to 25 KW $400 $41 5
$10
$61
$10
$64
Commercial each additional KW
issuance
Reinspection (half hour increments) $61 $96
Permit Extension (new) $92
Qualification fee $1 55 $222
2022 Proposed
Fee FEE
C:\Users\paolozzi\Desktop\Development Services Master Fee List comparison a

DESCRIPTION
s339

OTHER FEES

MISCELLANEOUS FEES
City of Tehachapi, CA
Development Services Department
Building, Engineering and Planning Fees
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (new) $670
Code compliance inspection $21 6 $351
Unreasonable hardship waiver (ADA) $1 55 $1 58
ADA lnspection Permit (new) $1 58
CAsp Fee (new) Cost + 25%
Permit re-issuance fee $61 $86
Substandard release fee $61 $e6
Fees not listed in this fee schedule T&M T&M
$3,040
Technology surcharqe (permit system, diqital document storaqe, etc) 60k $4,637
Long-range planning surcharge (General Plan & Zoning Code maintenance) 7.5% Consultant plan review (if required) cost + 15% cost + 25% 2022 Proposed
Fee

DESCRIPTION FEE
C:\Users\paolozzi\Desktop\Development Services Master Fee List comparison Buildinq Decision Appeal
City of Tehachapi, CA
Development Services Department
Building, Engineering and Planning Fees
Lot line adjustment $1,050 $1 ,1 86
Parcel map waiver $1,050 $1 ,1 86
Parcel $1,050 $1 ,1 86
Tentative parcel map $1,193 $1,349
Revised tentative parcel map $572 $653
Tentative tract $2,051 $2,328
Revised tentative tract $1,050 $1 ,1 86
Easement document review (legal description and plat map) $907 $1,023 Easement dedication to City (additional to above item if required) $858 $979 Certificate of correction/fi nal amendment ministrative 177 $1,33s Final parcel map check (base) $1 ,1 53 $1,480
Final parcel map check (per lot) $89 $1 18
Final tract map check (base) $1,705 $2,1 98
$26
Commercial or multiple family project (5 acres or less) $1,076 Final tract check
Commercial or multiple family proiect (qreater than 5 acres) (base) $457 $490 Commercial or multiple family project (greater than 5 acres) (per acre) $1 02 $140 Tract map / Parcel map (base) $1,028 $1,336
Tract map I Parcel map (per acre) $1 02 $140

REPORT REVIEW
Hydrology report $1,765 $2,002
Water/Sewer model $907 cost + 25%
Residential Subdivision
Street improvement plans (base) $876 $1,121
Street improvement plans (per sheet) $476 $522
Sewer system improvement plans (base) $876 $1,282
Sewer system improvement plans (per sheet) $476 $473
Water system improvement plans (base) $600 $762
Water system improvement plans (per sheet) $281 $277
Storm drain improvement plans (base) $876 $1,121
Storm drain improvement plans (per sheet) $476 $473
Wall Plans (base) $600 $762
Wall Plans (per sheet) $281 $277
Single Site Development
On-Site improvement plans without grading plan (base) $529 $680 On-Site improvement plans without gradinq plan (per sheet) $1 62 $229 On-Site improvement plans with grading plan (base) $733 $958 On-Site improvement plans with gradinq plan (per sheet) $491 $522 Off-Site improvement plans (base) $1,153 $1,480
Off-Site improvement plans (per sheet) $752 $669
Other
Storm water pollution prevention plan & monitoring plan (base) $600 $762 Storm water pollution prevention plan & monitorinq plan (per sheet) $238 $1 80 Minor revision to approved plan $4s7 $599
Major revision to approved plan T&M T&M
Construction permit issuance (when encroachment permit is not applicable) $240 $240

DESCRIPTION FEE

ENGINEERING FEES
2022 Proposed
Fee
C:\Users\paolozzi\Desktop\Development Services Master Fee List comparison

SUBDIVISION OF LAND
$21
GRADING PLAN REVIE\AT
$1 415

IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW
City of Tehachapi, GA
Development Services Department
Building, Engineering and Planning Fees
Administer application $70 $168
Encroachment Permit lnvoicing Fee $1 58 $147
Asphalt patch: <100 SF or 3 patches $250 $643
Asphalt patch: >100 SF or 3 patches >200 SF or 5 patches $581 $723 Asphalt patch: >200 SF or 5 patches T&M T&M
Commercial drive approach $51 6 $643
Residential drive approach $1 25 $321
Sidewalk: <100 SF $1 25 $402
Sidewalk: 100 SF >200 SF $581 $442
Sidewalk: >200 SF T&M T&M
Trenching/Utility work: <50 ft. of trench or 3 potholes $387 $522 Trenching/Utility work: 50 ft. of trench or 3 potholes > 100 ft. of trench or 5 potholes $581 $723 Trenching/Utility work: > 100 ft. of trench or 5 potholes T&M T&M Curb and gutter: < 20 ft. $250 $562
Curb and gutter: 20 ft. > 40 ft $645 $803
Curb and gutter: > 40 ft T&M T&M
iewerMaterline Tie-ln or Repair (new) $357
Wireless Telecom Antenna Permit $486 $524
ADA handicap ramp $387 $482
Traffic Control
Temporary control for day work $32 $54
Temporary lane closure for day work $103 $1 37
Overnight lane closure for work $194 $241
Materials Testing
cest-+-4€%
ees+-+-l€e7u W Ge€+-+-4€%
ces+-+-a€%
eb€+-+-4€%
Technology surcharge (permit system, digital document storaqe, etc) 60/o ces+-+-a€%
C:\Users\paolozzi\Desktop\Development Services Master Fee List comparison DESCR!PTION FEE 2022 Proposed
Fee

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
Testins reBert ere^aratien
FEES to al!
City of Tehachapi, CA
Development Services Department
Building, Engineering and Planning Fees
Annexation T&M $3426 (deposit)
General plan amendment $3,653 $4,606
Specific plan T&M T&M
Specific plan amendment $5,664 $4,450
Rezoning $3,842 $3,837
Lot line adjustmenUparcel map waiver $1 15 $122
Tentative Parcel Map $1,999 $2.240
Tentative Parcel Map (stand alone) (new) s5.221
Tentative Subdivision/Tract Map $7,727 $9,361
Finalmap $678 $767
Vesting Parcel Map (new) $9,004
$13,811
& Site Plan Review
1 Architectural
Tract
Change in use/Remodel (ministerial) $491 $392
Change in use/Remodel (discretionary) $1,877 $2,111
Architectural Review Only $2,257 $2,680
Multi-family residential s4,732 $6.507
Commercial development $5,066 $7,403
lndustrial development $4,665 $5,675
Minor change by director (substantial conformance) $1,525 $1,741 Other
Certificate of appropriateness (historical resources) $966 $826 Conditional use permit $1,615 $4,s21
Home occupation $1 00 $100
Minor use permit $550 $774
Minor use permiUappeal $975
Motorized Street Vendor Permit $416 $316
Mural fee $289 $313
Neiqhborhood Master Plan $5,655 $6,495
Outdoor seating permit $356 $391
Public Convenience and Necessity Application (ABC) $535 $623 Reasonable accommodation (ADA) $783 $500
eeaueea+ara-setUaef $908
Shopping cart containment plan $227 $214
Sign permit - minor $1 78 $1 70
Sign permit - major $544 $544
Temporary use permit $1 15 $122
Temporary use permit (banners) $20 $30
Variance - minor (Minor Modification/lnterpretation) $61 2 $359 Variance - major $1,683 $2,215
California Environmental Quality Act
Cateqorical exemption $230 $243
Negative declaration - minor (depending on staff availability) $2,619 $2,994 Negative declaration - major (depending on staff availability) $5,064 $5,828 Environmental impact report (depending on staff availability) T&M T&M Special studies as required (traffic, bioloqical, archeoloqical, etc) Cost + 15% cost + 25% Consultant CEQA preparation (depending on staff availability) Cost + 15% Cost + 25% Miscellanous Actions
C:\Users\paolozzi\Desktop\Development Services Master Fee List comparison DESCRIPTION FEE 2022 Proposed
Fee

PLANNING FEES

ADMINISTRATIVE & LEGISLATIVE
City of Tehachapi, CA
Development Services Department
Building, Engineering and Planning Fees
Time Extension (new) $995
Zoning and application confirmation $1 65 $239
Appeal of decision (Director) $962 $1,288
Technology surcharoe (permit system, diqital document storaqe, etc) of decision $2,584
6%
$2,900
Long-range planning surcharge (General Plan & Zoning Code maintenance) 7.50k 2022 Proposed
Fee

DESCRIPTION FEE
C:\Users\paolozzi\Desktop\Development Services Master Fee List comparison to
City of Tehachapi, GA
Development Services Department
Building, Engineering and Planning Fees
Development Services Director $286 $s26
Associate Engineer $1 33 $1 96
Enoineerinq Aide $1 29 $161
Office Assistant $93 $1 07
Building lnspector $1 01 $1 07
Permit Technician $80 $73
Planner $1 10 $1 29
Overtime inspection (Hourly Rate) $1 84 $1 93

DESCRIPTION FEE
Productive Hourly Rates by Position
2022 Proposed
Fee
C:\Users\paolozzi\Desktop\Development Services Master Fee List comparison -
T
{5
3l ta
a
q
$
?tr
tr
a
City of Tehachapi ,
Ca liforn a
Development User Fee Update
January 2023
Capital Accounting Partners, LLC
3570 Buena Vista Drive
Sacramento, CA 95864
(916) 670-0001
t
E
d'&
451 368 184 s4
166 1'72
4 $
3 EE rl
Table cf Contents
City of Tehachapi Reporl
Project Scope ?
Summary of Costing Methodologies - User Fee Study .....................2 Assuring Quality Results
User Fee Study
Appendices
Capital Accounting Partners Proposal for
City of Tehachapi, CA
page 1

PROJECT SCOPE
The City re-engaged CapitalAccounting Partners (CAP)to update its Building, Planning, and Development Engineering fees. CAP provided the City's first fee study in 2015-2016. An update followed this in 2018. lt is generally considered best practice for cities to review their user fees regularly. ln keeping with this practice, the City determined that an update was in its best interest. The scope included:
. Updating labor, nonlabor, and overhead costs to fiscal2022-2023; . Reviewing permit and application processes workflows; . Updating and reconfiguring permits and applications where appropriate; and . Reviewing the role and impact of customer services on applicants.

Special thanks to the outstanding efforts of the Community Development staff for the quick response to data requests.

SU tVI tVI ARY OF COSTING
tVI ETHODOLOGIES USER FEE STUDY
The methodology used to calculate the cost of user fee studies is based on developing a driver-based costing model. This is a detailed and robust method of calculatlng the cost of a specific service. The approach is based on the principles of activity-based costing, Activity Based Costing seeks to calculate cost based on assessing operational workflows. Practically, this means it relies on understanding the time staff invests in core business processes to provide fee and non-fee services. This provides the ability to understand staff time and cost as each staff position participates in providing fee services.

Project Steps and Process
Step 1: Collect Data - This first step involves discussions with staff to identify those positions within the department that provide and support direct services. lt also consists in collecting departmental budget and expenditure data, identifying the salary and benefits for each position, and identifying non-personnel expenditures and any departmental and Citywide overhead. Specifically, the steps involve the following:
o ldentifring staff positions - This includes aligning staff names and positions.

Capital Accounting Partners Proposal for
City of Tehachapi, CA
page 2
o Calculating the number of productive hours - For each position, vacation time, sick leave, paid holidays, professional development (training), routine staff meetings, and daily work breaks are deducted from the standard 2,080 annual hours. The result is a range of hours available for each position on an annual basis. This range is typically 1,500 to i,600 hours. Factors influencing this range are length of service with the jurisdiction and local holidays and personal leave time policies.

However, based on previous work with the City where the calculated number of productive hours was almost exactly 1600 hours, and at the request of the Office of Management and Finance, we set all positions at'1600 productive hours.
o ldentifring and allocating non-personnel costs - Costs for materials and supplies are allocated to the salary and benefits for each position.
o Assigning any other expenses that are budgeted in other areas - There are often expenses that should be included with the total cost of services. Examples of such costs might include amortized capital expenses for vehicles and technology.
o ldentiffing core business processes or actMities - This step also involves discussions with staff to understand, at an operational level, the work of the operating unit. Core business processes used to provide services are identified and then defined by the tasks that are involved. Direct and indirect categories also organize processes.
o Direct processes and activities - Those processes that directly contribute to processing an application or permit are first identified. Examples of a direct activity are building inspection, application intake, and pre-application review.
o lndirect processes and activities - Are those processes that support, but do not directly apply to the processing of a specific application or permit. An example of an indirect activity is customer service or staff training to maintain certifications. Most jurisdictions highly value customer service, but assigning a specific cost or unit of time to an individual service is difficult.

Step 2: Building cost structures - This second step involves significant interaction with staff and the development of time estimates for both direct and indirect processes in each department. Specifically, this step is at the core of the analysis. Four processes comprise this step:
o Gathering time estimates for direct processes - By interviewing staff in individual and group meetings, an estimate of time was assigned to each service by the indicated process. For the most part, the processes included three primary steps:
r Permit intake;
. Plan review; and
o Constructioninspections.
ln this analysis, staff time is estimated and assigned to each step. The sum of all the process steps is the total time that is required to provide that specific service.

Assigning indirect and annual process time - An annual time estimate is gathered from staff for those indirect or supporl processes in which they are involved. These may include actrvities such as program administration, customer service, and department administration. These costs are allocated to all services proportionately to all services provided by the department. a
Capital Accounting Partners Proposal for
City of Tehachapi, CA
page 3
. Calculating fully loaded hourly rates and the cost of service - Once the total time for each direct and indirect service is estimated, the cost of service is calculated by using the fully loaded hourly rates for each staff member or position that is involved with the service. The fully loaded hourly rate for each employee is based on the employee s salary and benefit costs plus a share of non-personnel and City overhead costs divided by the employee's available work hours (i.e. 2,080 hours minus all leave hours).

Thus, the direct and indirect cost by activity also includes departmental and Citywide overhead as well as nonlabor costs. The City's indirect and non-personnel costs are from the annual budget or cost allocation that the City has established.
o Gathering activity or volume data - A critical element in the analysis is the number of times a given service is provided annually. This is critical data for three reasons:
. lt allows a calculated projection of current revenue based on current prices. This is compared with actual revenue to see if there is a close match as the data should match. . lt allows for a calculated projection of revenue at full cost. This is compared to actual expenditures to see if there is a close match as the data should match. . lt allows for a calculation of total hours consumed. Hours consumed must closely match actual hours available.
lf any of the three calculations do not approximate actual numbers, then time estimates and/or volume data need re-evaluation. Again, these are critical quality checks for costing accuracy.

Step 3: Calculating the full cost of services - This third step calculates the full cost of service for each direct service in the department. ln the previous step, the service cost was calculated for each direct and indirect service. ln this step, the cost layers are brought together to establish the full cost of service for a specific direct service, program, or activity. As previously mentioned, the cost of each direct service is calculated.

The cost of indirect services is allocated to each direct service to determine the full cost of service. The indirect services costs are allocated to each dlrect service based on each direct services proportion of labor spent processing each permit and application. By adding the direct and allocated indirect costs and multiplying that by the activity data, a total service cost is calculated for both an individual service and the operating unit.

Step 4: Set fees
The recommended fees can be established based on new, existing, or revised cost recovery policies. The recommended fees will be established based on City staff recommendations and Council discussion in the future. The fee analyses in this report are based on full cost recovery.

Assuring Quality Results
ln our analysis, we utilize both quantitative and qualitative tests for quality. These tests are an essential part of our costing models and processes. Without these, the results lack defensibility and integrity.

Qualitative
Our process incorporates substantial input from both individuals and groups. Our bias is that we get the best data from group interviews. For example, in determining how much time is required for any specific building rnspection, we want to hear the perspective of an inspectol the inspector supervisor, and the Capital Accounting Partners Proposal for
City of Tehachapi, CA
page 4
C rf Tehar, har Ret
counter tech or project manager. Each will have a perspective. Each will contribute value to the estimate.

When all perspectives agree, we have confidence in our results.

Quantitative
We also utilize four quantitative measures of quality data. When each of these measures match and there are no major disagreements with the quantitative assessment, we have significant confidence in our results These quantitative measures are:

Targeted Margin of Error
1) Budgeted expenses entering the cost models must equal total expenses accounted for in the costing model.
2l Projected revenue from fees must closely match actual revenue from fees. +or3) Available staff time must be fully accounted for in the costing models. 4l Total revenues from fees and contributions from the general fund or other sources must match total expenses.
0%
Capital Accounting Partners Proposal for
City of Tehachapi, CA
page 5
o%
o%

USER FEE STUDY RESULTS
The results of this update results demonstrate an opportunity to increase cost recovery from developmentrelated user fees. There are two major reasons why user fees increase in cost over time:

1. The regulatory environment changes. Additional federal and state regulations require more time and effort to process fee-based services.

2. Changes in labor costs. We generally find that city labor costs are currently outpacing the general rate of inflation. This has been especially true in the last several months.

Summary of Revenues and Expenses
The reader will note that the largest cost increase is in Engineering and Planning fees. ln most of our user fee studies, this is where we see the opportunity for additional cost recovery. Typically, this is where we see costs outpacing general labor costs.

Support and Overhead Costs
We are frequently asked about overhead. More specifically, overhead rates. User fees, overhead and support costs come from a variety of sources:

1. City overhead.

2. Departmental management and administration.

3. Support services to applicants.

Generally, the largest component of these costs are those associated with support services to applicants. This comes in a variety of activities:

1. Counter time is where the public will come in to ask a question of counter staff, request time with a planner, or engineer. These general questions may or may not turn into applications or permits.

Buildino Fees $ 140,755 $ 117,145 ($23,610)
Enqineerinq Fees $ 139,267 $ 100,875 ($38,3e2)
Planning Fees $ t 99,541 $ 123,082 ($76,45e)
Totals $ 479.563 s 341.102 ($138,461)
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy) Division Or Discipline
Capital Accounting Partners Proposal for
City of Tehachapi, CA
page 6

2. Pre-application review. Cities will frequently spend significant time working with applicants before a project is ever started. Ir/ost cities consider this a value-added service to the applicant and a benefit to the City. Applications that are delivered in good form and all required documentation is delivered speeds the process through the system faster. This means the developer spends less time with City staff on multiple iterations of plans. As a result, the developer starts their project faster and the City spends less time on the application.

OBSERVATI ONSAND
RE COIVI IVI E N DAT! ON S
Adjusting the Fee Schedule
One of the most common challenges we see in municipal government concerning fees is the failure to adjust fees regularly. Those cities that practice regular adjustments to fees tend to have better cost recovery and a higher level of service for their customers. Conversely, those that do not update their fees regularly tend to recover less and less costs and the level of customer service follows.

Therefore, we applaud the City of Tehachapi for continuing the practice of regular fee updates. Besides better cost recovery, we also find that cities that regularly update their fees provide the highest customer service level.

For flat fees we recommend using a simple CPI type increase that is attached to the City's labor cost. For example, if the labor cost for the City goes up by 27o then adjust each fee by 2o/". This is the simplest and most common method of adjusting fees. However, we observe that the regulatory requirements change enough within three to five years to warrant a comprehensive review of costs. Therefore, we also recommend similar adjustments to productive hourly rates when these are the basis of a fee as well as percentages of engineers cost estimates.

Building Reserves
Since the "great depression of 2007" many of our clients have recognized the value of reserves for building functions. Due to the volatile nature of building activity, reserves provide a cushion to the general fund. ln addition, when larger construction projects require 6-24 months to complete, reserves provide a funding mechanism for these projects over a longer time period.

Capital Accounting Partners Proposal for
City of Tehachapi, CA
page 7
City of Tehachapi Report
Therefore, as a long-term strategy, we recommend developing a reserve fund to be managed for exclusive use for Community Development. These resources can be used to maintain staffing during short-term economic downturns, maintain up-to-date technology, which is a value-added benefit to builders and developers, or add staffing during spikes in building activity.

APPENDICES
Capital Accounting Partners Proposal for
City of Tehachapi, CA
page 8
City of Tehachapi, CA
Building, Engineering ond Plonning Fees
BSl
BS2 Home (new)
BS3 1-1200 SF
tddit'oml 1oo SF
check (in-house)
Singlo Family Home (addition)
't,200 sF
additional '100 SF
Alt. (remodel)
additional 100 SF
Plan review SFH remodel
IBS16 lorpli*t R""identialHotlsrEunitpermitplan Check
house)
BS2O I Each additional 1000 SF
BS 21 Each additional 1000SF for floors above tw
(s122)
(s34)
111e)
(s30)
(se7)
BS 22
BS 23 Commercial Shell
(s40)
(s1o)
15 I
(S663)
(s42)
35 _UP to 20 openings __
Each additional window
Patio
43 44 75i3F and greatef
Plan Roview
P@13, Spr.

Each
45 Masonry Walls
567
ss
92 7
14 9
74 9
141
116 (s8
s1s8
S13
Sso
s31
s3s
155.00

12.00 50.00

31.00 35.00

60.00 31.00

45.00 (s130)
(5r)
(s67)
219.00
S61
542o
52L7
ssss
$e1a
($a)
(s868)
(s3)
(Sr1
(s4)
(S1)
2,2t4 s2,170
S1o8
s1,9s3
110
19 65
241
111
19 7
7 13
7 7
13 385
729
S19o
s32
s112
s41s
S192
s32
s80
s14
s47
S17s
s81
Sra
7,332
225
1,453
2,908
46 S376
5724
(sess)
(ss)
51 Each (ss)

4 5
6 3
15 2
11 31
4 17
4 77
2 15
11 31
EA
2 2
15 8
5422
S14
S468
S170
s1s
S17s
s19
s82
S168
541s
s4s
s196
S399
S 1,001
532
S1,110
S403
54s
409.00

43.00 184.00
351.00
s
s
s
5 s
943.00

31.00 685.00
373.O0

43.00 580
19 643
234
26 247
26 113
237
s
s
s
s
s
5 s
s
9le^
93 93
!*
-9?
74 354
62 5697
968
s6s
s31s
s4s
ss4
s258
s4s
S1,6s6
s161
s161
5149
S1o7
s129
S612
S1o7
s
1,591.00
102.00
123.00
729.OO
102.00
123.00
568.00
102.00
(s48)
(s12)
(S6s)
{sse)
(s38)
(s20)
(Ss)
(s6)
(sar)
(ss)
(ssE)
{Sr)
(542s)
1530)
(Sz1
(s6)
(52)
DtreculnttI tnaltea I an", lro,",ao.,l arr"n, I unit
I Unlt I I .l lsurcharteot cost I aucateo I c*ts I A$ltmd I Fee / Revenuc I tsuu.rt t Unlt Cost Summary
5t,227
s64s
5702
S10,373
S951
5r,492
s731
5 s
s
s
5 s
s
s
s
s
11,016
997
r,674
165
7,246
s
675
799
1,498
274
9,183
858
s1,4s8
$2o4
s8,s20
S816
Annu.l @st calculat ons
I Proiection ol I
Revenue at tull | ' I Annual Surplus
Cost or servicesl l"'"":"-t 1l | (suusioyl I Current tees I $!M
(s36)
Capital Accounting Partners
150 SF
188.00

31.00 BldgE ngCostCalcs
i$.

Service fi Fee Name Unit
ActualWork
volume
RecoveiGd
RevenuG
volume
BS7
BSA
BSq
BSiO
RS t1
1'
Rq 11
BS 17
BS 1A COMMERECIAL NEW CONSTRUC
RS 1q
25 ?a
E_rch additional story ow
29 ommorcirl Tl
30 1000 sF
a)
2 2
at
rlete
:lete
A?
4a
49 50
s
q
q
5 s
s
s
s
S
s
s
q
q
q
q
s
s
s
q
q
(
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
5 s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
2 4
2 4
City of Tehachapi, CA
Building, Engineeilng ond Plonning Fees
0-300 sF
E ch addilidin 1so sF
Photo Voltaic Sol.r
BS 58
BS 59
BS 60
BS 61 Each additional KW
62 Plan Review
enclosure
re@ver
69 Demolition
pemanant foundation and utility
BS 74 <50 yards
certified
78 Residential Electrical Fees
80 Residential Eleclrical simple
Residential EleclriGl - complex
Commercial Electrical Fees
Commercial Electri€l - simple
Comrercial_- @mplex
BS 87 Residential Plumbing Fees
Residential Plumbing - simple
BS 97 Residential Mechaniml complex
Commeicial Mechanical Fe€s
Mechanical rrrple__
Mechanicl - complex
so
-
(s212)
(91,470)
!i!r_l
($174)
€l?zu
(s2s)
(s
(s3e8)
37 ($ro1
4 30
12s
38 6
50 r29
4 30
125
38 5
50 729
38 2
1 13
1 1
38 2
1 13
5 7
37 1
29 1
2 4
48 5
1 31
1 29
L
2 4
48 *s
R4overed
R€venue
Actual Work
volume
s
5 247
19 165
5 247
6 t72
S127
s4
s!7s
S4
s81
$17s
s14
s
s
s
)
5 5
s
323.00

31.00 278.00

10.00 400.00
10,00
184.00
19,94
{$r1
-
(se)
(So)
(Srs)
(So)
(Ss1
s
s
s
s
5 s
s
s
s
s
s
s
54 54
92 73
54 54
92 73
259
54 54
2,685
$40
S40
$57
ss3
s40
$40
s57
ss3
S188
s40
s40
S1,9s2
ss4
s94
s1s8
s126
se4
se4
s1s8
S126
S448
ss4
se4
54,637
s
)
s
s
5 5
s
5 s
s
5 94.00

94.00 155.00
125.00

94.00 94.00
186.00
125,00
431.00

94.00 94.00
3,040.00
SO
9o
SO
so
S28
so
5o
110
250
151
501
92 166
729
386
729
274
151
42?
s
s
s
s
s
s
5 s
s
s
s
)
se4
9202
s80
s182
s67
S121
ss4
s280
S11o
s354
S110
s310
S19o
s431
526t
5866
S1s8
5287
5222
S565
5222
S48o
S2G1
5737
s
s
s
s
s
s
S
s
)
s
s
s
100.00
339.00
155.00
498.00

80.00 216.00
155.00
492.00

80.00 216.00
155.00
339.00
(1991
(ss2)
1918)
{S368)
(s78)
(s71)
(567)
{s174)
{11{?)
(s2a)
111991
(s3s8)
lndirect
Unit
Allocated
Unit
surchar8e ot Other Total Cost
Costs Assi8ned
Unit Cct Summtry
Oirecl Unlt
Cost
Current
fee / Revenue
(S12
so
528
1S1
(s3,7s1)
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
7,662
965
35,846
391
2,492
514
24,447
57,292
S93o
S34,7so
S38o
S2,40o
Ssoo
523,736
(s370)
(s3s)
(s1,096)
(s11)
(5gr)
(Su)
(S1,151)
s
s
s
s
s
6,010
188
158
1,538
94 ss,8so
s188
S18G
s1,62s
ss4
S 7,s91
7,772
666
4,231
480
737
s
s
s
s
s
s
3,462
s
S3,840
S339
s310
S1,992
s77s
S49z
S2,960
s216
Revenue at tull
Annual Cost Calculatioos
Cost of
Anneal Surplus
(subsldy)
Proiection of
Rdenues at
Curient Fees
Capital Ac6unting Partners
3 3

s64 61.00 193
BldgEngCostcalcs
FEES
Servi(€ f tee Name Urit
53 54
55 55
57 64
65 66
57 to
71 7'
73 7\
76 Buildino Decision AoDeal
a1
a2
a3
Rd
A5
a6
RN
90 91
92 c3
qd
q5
qA
100
101
10?
'l o3
1U
s
s
s
s
s
s41s
s32
Szet
S1o
s41s
s10
s193
I
s
BS 114
BS 115
BS 123
BS 125 Parcel mer9er
City of Tehachapi, CA
Building, Engineeilng and Plonning Fees
Technology Surcharge (permit system maintenance,
digital document scnning & storage, etc)
Outside plan check fees, (at consultant mst plus
Parcel map waiwr
, iCouncil for Acceptance) - Additional to above item if I lrequired
iBS 132 lCedmete of @rectionfiml map amendmenl
iBS 126 lTentative oarcel mao
iBS 127 lRevised tentatiw pa@lmap #
lBs 128 lTentatiwtrad ffi
J BS 1 30 | Easement docunenl revier, (legal description ard I lpm map) I lacres) (per acre) @@
Capilal Accounting Partnerg
BS 131 nAEaid totFGC easement to ery
fee)
141
I lComrercial or multi famiv grcater than 5 ams
(base)
BS 143 Commercial or multiple family projecl (greater than 5 or
Ss96
s206
S5s
ss52
sse
(s33)
{S3
(S38)
)
4 99
4 99
s
s
s
819
2U
81 7't3
81 S1,41s
S49o
5 s140
$
s1,336 54,tt2
s10,098
(s1,231)
(S3,8oo)
(S

s
s
s
s
s
s
s
56 729
203
92 50
56 r12
s41
5s4
S148
s67
s36
s41
S81
6% 6%
ss6
s222
s3s1
s1s8
s85
se5
s193

61.00 155.00
216.00
155.00

51.00 51.00
)
s
s
5 5
s 184.00
6%
(ss)
(s0)
(s3s)
(s57)
(S13s)
(Sa)
(s2s)
{s3s)
S1,041
s13s
s
s
1,995.00
307.00
s
s
7,432
186
52,474
s322 (S1
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
)
s
s
547
587
647
781
374
1,3tt8
647
592
557
773
s499
s499
s49s
S558
s27s
S98o
S499
S431
s472
ss52
S1,186
s1,186
S1,186
S1,349
S6s3
S2,328
S1,186
S1,023
9979
s1,33s
1,050.00
1,050.00
1,050.00
1,193.00
572.OO
2,051.00
1,050.00
s 1,177.00
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s 858.00
907.00 (5116)
(S12r)
(s158)
6t3q
1t1391
(s136)
(5rse)
,
(S81)
lw)
{s136}
s
s
s
s
857
68 1,273
15 S623
s4s
S92s
su
S1,480
s118
s2,198
s26
s
s
s
)
1,153.00

89.00 705.00
2 1.00
($327)
(s2e)
(s1,4931
(9s1
lndlrect
Unlt
Allooted
Unlt Cost Summery
Unh
SuicharSe ot Direct Unit
Cost
Oth€r
Costs
Total Cost
Assitned
Curent
Fee / Revenue
667
431
193
4,000
5 5
5 s
s46s
S3os
S184
s31
(s126)
(s3,s6s)
(5202)
(se)
s 5,930
L,349
2324
ss,2so
S1,193
s2,0s1
Ite80)
(s1s6)
(5r??)
s
s
2,194
1,358
s70s
S1,092
61,493)
(s266)
Actual cost
Actual cost plus
25%
3 5
1 516
60 3
5 7
516
1't6 I
1 17 First 5000 SF
'l 18 Each additional 1000 SF
1'19
T&M 72
5 1
1 5
1 7
1U
1 52
1 52
Final parcel map check (base)
Final parcel map check (per lot)
Final tract map check (base)
Final tract map check (per lot)

ENGINEERING FEES
Rccovered
Rserue Actual Work
Volume
S14o s
1,076.00
451.00
102.00
1,028.00
102.00 (s38)
5,343
13,898
BldgEngCostCalcs
*d
Service f Fee Name Unit
105
t06
107
rnn lnrcesonable Hardshio Waiver (ADA)
'109
110
srmit re-issuanca tee
Jbstilldard Elese fe
tss 111 Fees not listed in this fee schedule will be at the aDolicable PHR
tss 113
Multi-Familv
1?O
BS 121 LDC Review (assrslarc wth generating conditions ol aooroval
1)2
1?n
1:15
1:tt
134
13C
1AO
Revenue at
Revenue5 at (5ubsidy)
s
s
Plan Chock
s
s
City of Tehachapi, CA
Building, Engineeilng ond Plonning Fees
BS 155
BS 156
BS 167
170
BS 177
182
185
186
187
168 lOn-Site improvement plans without grading plan (per _sheet)
BS 169 On-Site improvement plans with grading plan (base) improvement plans with grading plan (per
improvement plans (base)
improvement plans (per sheet)
or 3 patches
patch: >'100 SF or 3 patches >200 SF or 5
(Sge)
(s3e3)
104
20,568
97 372
419
7A
33 32 ss3
5721 (s142)
S8,ooo
ls7,il4l
(s12,s68)
I lpatct'es
Cadtal Accounting Partners Page 4 of I
S 1,1s9 S843 S2,oo2 s 7,765.00
907.00
15237l,
s907
649
302
742
274
44r
161
649
274
M7
161
5472
52?o
ss0
S199
s32r.

S117
5472
S199
s321
S117
51,121
s522
51,282
5473
5762
5277
s1,121
$473
s762
5277
876.00
476.00
876.00
476.00
600.00
281.00
876.00
476.00
600.00
281.00
53 S4
s3
s4
394
732
s55
302
857
388
S286
ss6
S403
S22o
s623
5282
S68o
5229
ssss
5s22
s1,480
$669
529.00
152.00
733.00
491.00
153.00
752.00
llru
(s57)
(9zzs1
583
s
447
104
347
139
s321
s76
52s2
S1o1 5240
5762
S18o
5s99
s
s
5 s 240.O0
600.00
238.00
457.0O
So
{s162)
ss8
(5I42)
lndhect
Unit
Allocated
Alsigned
Total Cost
Unh C6t Summary
Unlt
surcharge or
Dlrect Unlt
C6t
Curent
Fee / Revense
Other
Costs
2,242
77,160
2,563
14,675
L,524
4,762
1,121
4,267
St,7s2
S16,184
St,7s2
sr4,756
s1,200
s4,21s
S87E
s4,2A4
S81
$s3
923
s
s
958
6,264
S733
Ss,892
(s22s)
(S376)
3,044
1,436
S2,/oo
S1,904
(5618)
5458
Anrual Cost Calculadons
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
Proiection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Rsenue at Full
Cost of Seruices
2 34
2 31
2 15
1 9
2 34
2 31
2 15
1 9
.)E!gr-!EpLorgq'_e3l!9!{p9!!!9et)
system improvement plans (per sheet)
drain improvement plans (per sfEet)
Storm drain improvement plans (base)
15? improvement plans (base)
Plans (base)
qqq9lpgtlt'e9q)
!
72 1
72 176
T&M
Actual + 25%
4 8
4 8
1U
water pollution prevention plan & monitoring
permit issuance (when encroach is N/A)
water prevention plan
sheet)
Minor I plan
to
plus
Recovered
Revenue
T&M
5277
s304

70.00 250.00
581.00
BldgEngCostCalcs
Plan Check
Service f Fee Name Unit Actoal work
volume
Remrt Rev
Hydrology report
Water/Seu/er model report (actual cost plus 25%)
151
1q)
153
1\
rrcr svslcm imorovcmpnl olans thasel
161
162
163
16,4
165
166 Sinole Sita DevoloDment
1t1
174
17t
171
olan (base)
tsS 178
119
1AO
BS 181
1R3
Encrcachment Pem
I
s
5 (
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
5 s
s
q
)
s
s
5 s
s
City of Tehachapi, CA
Bullding, Engineefing ond Plonning Fees
Commercial
BS 191 drive approach
BS 192 SideMlk: <100 SF
Fee
trerch or 3 potholes
lBS197 iTrencttirE/Utilrty mrkr 50 ft. of trench or 3 potholes > S139
($s41)
I 1100 fl. of lrerch or 5 S284 potholes
IBS 198 lTrencfiing/Utility rvork: > '100 ft. of trench or 5 I lpottrotes
BS 212
BS 2OO
BS 201
202
BS 209
BS 210
8S211
Pt1
Pt2
Pt3
Pt4
Pt5
Pt6
PL7
PL8
PL9
PL 10
PL 11
clrb glg-guttg. .*2!ll
.Curb and gutter: 20 fl. >-40.-fl
-c-!E s!g!!{Leli>-_lg ft_
ADA handicap ramp
rcrk
land closure for work
in Use / Remodel (disretionary)
Residential
Development
Development
Exemptbn
Use Permit
491.00
I,417.OO
4,732.OO
5,066.00
4,665.00
230.00
1,615.00
3,531
2,111
13,01S
44,427
77,O25
use
Per application
Per appli@tion
Per application
Per application
Pe. application
Per application
Per application
cost
9 227
1,222
3,76a
4,287
3,246
141
2,518
s
S16s
S889
52,740
S3,117
S2,38e
S1o2
S1,903
S392
S2,111
S6,so7
57,4o3
Ss,G7s
s243
s4,s27
s4,41s
5r,877
s9,454
S30,395
S13,99s
see 5888
2 6 6
3 s
s
s
140
372
186
233
256
85 302
419
303
326
465
279
s
)
s
s
s
5 )
5 s
s
s
s
S101
5277
s13s
S169
S186
s22O
S23i
S338
S2o3
s62
s22O
s304
S241
ss3
s321
S4o2
5442
S147
5522
s723
5s24
Ss62
S803
S482
)
s
387.00
5 s
s
s
193.50
516.00
125.00
125,00
s81.00
387.00
581.00
486.00
250.00
il5.00
S139
(ses)
(S147)
(S13s)
(S142)
.(s38)
(S312)
(Srsa1
s
s
s
79 140
s
5 1,983
r,679
s23
ss8
S1o1
57,442
s7,22r
ss4
S137
524!
53,426
s2,900
s
s

32.00 103.00
194.00
5,433.00
2,584.00
I
.(!22)
Gnl
(s47)
S2,oo7
(S316)
lndirect
Unit
Allocated
Unit Cost Summary
Unh
surcharte ot tJarect Unit
Cost
Other
Costs
Total Cost
Assitned
Current
fee / Revenue
s
s
s
s
s
1,286
6,424
442
2,089
(1,446)
s1,032
s1,s48
( 5 1,162 )
S2,mo
ss81
s
s
2,O52 s1,216
S1,7s1
(S835)
(ss71)
Revenue at full
Cost of Seruices
Proiection ol
Raenues at
Curent Fees
Annual Surpl6
(subsldy)
Annual C6t calculatlons
(S2s4)
1 2
4 4
(2)
2 16
1 T&M
Per lnvoice
T&M
NEW
T&M
Per application
T&M plus State
and LAFCO Fees
39 17
38 17
FEES
R6oveied
Rdenue Adual Work
volume
205
206
207
204
Capatal Accounting Partners
lmpact Report
2s%l
3

*a
Service f Fee Name U nit
1Aq
,q0
1q1
2td3
2M
s
(
s
s
5 s
s
s
)
)
s
s
s
)
1 9
1 2
City of Tehachapi, CA
Building, Engineering ond Plonning Fees
Map
Plan Amendment
Occupation
Line AdjustmenUParcel irlap Waiver
and appli€tion corfirmation
Permit - m6ior
Pennil - rninor
Plan (plus @nsulting fees if arry)
Plan Amendment
Parcel Map (supplemental to another
Map
Minor Modill€tiorvl nterpretalion
major
Tract Map
Reasonable a@mmodations
use permit
Temporary use permit
Shopping @rt containment plan
Neighborhood Master Plan
Special studies as required (traffic, biologi@1,
arch@logical, etc)
Long ranSe planning & ZoninS Code Update surcharBe
Planned Development (deposit)
s1,128
S323
S1,939
S1,51s
s229
572
S1,874
t943
S3,941
S1s1
S933
5s,81s
S382
S326
522,so7
ss,81s
s2,580
5767
s4606
s4450
52,24o
S9,361
s3s9
s2,21s
s13,811
S9o8
s774
S6,495
ss3,461
s13,811
2,257.00
678.00
3,653.00
5 alone 4
Per application
Actual Cost
Per application 19
Per application
Per application
Per application
Per appli@tion
T&M plus 25%
Per application
Per application
Per.pplication
Per application
Per 6pplication
Per application
Per appli@tion
Per appli@tion 4
4 5 1,ss2
PL 13
Pt 34
PL 40
PL 41
5,664.00
1,999.00
7,727.O0
1,583.00
4,030.00
783.00
550.00
s2s3
{ss
5 (s
444
2,667
118
70 138
2,222
315
99 s
s
s
s
5 )
5 s 100.00 (s1
(S1,5
19 S86 52o3
ss1 5722
51oo 5239
s
s
s s3,837
Ss44
s
S17o s
115.00
165.00
3,842.00
544.00
178.00
ss
s8
51,214
s
s
s
5 4 4
s
s
s
s
9 1
9 1
s
5 s
s
s
Adual
consultant cost
2,517
1,297
5,4-20
208
\243
7,997
526
44 S 30,9s3
5 7,997
s
s
)
s
s
s
3 3
(Se,
s
s
(s12
(S2
(s
4 24 70
724
3,76t
s214
ss1 St22
S9o
s
115
227
5,555
s13
52,73s
+ 25% admin
Potential
Surcharge on
BuildinS and
PlanninS Apps
T&M
9 7.
so (ss3,460)
PL 42
lndireat
Unlt
Allocated
Othet Total Cost
Costs AssiSned
Unh Con Summary
Unlt
Surcharge ol Ixrect U nlt
Cost
Current
Fee / Revenue
Pt 22
Pt 21
PL 24
PL 25
PL 26
PL 27
PL 28
PL 29
PL 30
PL 31
PL 32
PL 33
t4
15 Pt 15
PL 17
PL 18
Pt 19
PL 20
PL 35
PL 36
PL 37
PL 38
PL 39
72 Rsovered
Rwenue
volume
Adual Work
volume
S 70,722
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
)
5 s
s
s
4,606
3,863
609
954
4,497
r70
2,2&
9,361
359
6,546
3,O-97
2,9?!
S9,028
s3,6s3
S1,9oo
s4,896
s178
SsTs
s660
S1,999
s7,727
5612
Ss,o49
S2,2oo
52,760
(s1,s63)
52s3
(s1,6s4)
(5es3)
_1131
(s2s4)
r51l
s8
(S8e7)
I9M)
Revenu€ at Full
Annual Cost Calculatlons
cost ot
Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
Proiection of
Revenues at
Capital Acmunting Partners Page 6 of I
(ss3,460)
(s13,811)
53,461
BldgE ngCostcalcs
i$r
or
1 1
1 1
1 1
s
1 I 5
s
s
S€rvice f Fee Name U nit
(s8el
1 PL 43
PL 44
PL 45
PL 46
PL 47
Pr 48
PL 49
PL 50
PL 51
PL 52
PL 53
PL 54
1,4
City of Tehachapi, CA
Building, Engineefing ond Plonning Fees
Lands@pe - minor (<25m SF)
Land!6pe- major (>250O SF)
Landsepe - residential
Permit Extension
55 56
s7
58 59
50 61
62 63
64 7
Per application
Per application
Per appli@tion
Per application
t43
255
95 64
s62
s114
s41
s28
S2os
s379
S137
ss2
S178
s1,350
s88
(5e2)
ss,362
s72,773
s1,12s
$2,49s
59,522
5442

Negative Declaration - Mino.

Negative Declaration - Major
Motorized Street Vendor Permit
Public Convenience and Necessity Application (ABC)
Muralfee
Outd@r Seating Permit
certiflcate of Appropriateneis
substantial conformance
Appeal of Decision (Di.6tor)
Actual cost plus
25%
Actual cost plus
25%
Per applic.tion
Per application
Per applic.tion
Per application
Per application
Per application
Per aopliotion
1 1
1 1
CD Diredor
Associate Engineer
EngineerinE Aid
Adminstrative Analyst
Building lnspector
Counter/Admin
Planner
1 7
1 7
Per application
Per application
Per appli@tion
15 4
15 4
I Re-roof first 1000 sF
I Re-.oof each additional 1000 SF
Non-Occupied Accessory Structure > 120SF
Landscao
Per application
Per application
(non-ADA)
{ADA)

NEW FEES
Productive Rateg Po$ition
R&overed
Rwcnue
volume
Actual wo*
volume
t,734
3,374
183
361
181
227
474
1,008
5 746
,Effi..,ffi
s 189
s
I
S 117
s62
S 1s1
s
5 s
s
s
s
s
5 113
93 75
74 51
9o
s1,261
52,4s4
s133
5262
S132
s16s
S348
5733
5s42 I
S137
S82
s68
S32
s32
522
s3s
I
ss0
521
s6s
52,994
Ss,828
S316
S623
S313
S391
S825
5t,747
S1,288 I
5326
S196
S161
527i
s8s
S167
s107
5107
s73
s12s
2,619
5,oil
416
535
249
356
966
r,525
962
-
S 286
S 133
-
)
s
5 5
5 )
s
s
729
93 101
80 110
5100
S14o
(5 126) I
is40)
15217
51 (S157)
(S8e)
s37
s69
S121
5228
s
s
85 159
(s121)
(s228)
S 313
5 s
5 1,741
s
I
S 326
s
I
s 2.506
s
S 867
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
746 -
S286
S1,s2s
s289
5707
(s2,s06)
(s216)
(s3e)
(S867
(s24)
(s40)
s
s
Capital Accounting Partners
14 L4
383
7,739
2,457
2,657
683
BldgEngCostCalcs
7 s
5 s
s
s
s
s
5 5
Service f Fee Name Uf,it
Unit Cost Summary Anrual Cost Calculatlons
Oired Unit
Cost
lndirect
Unit
Allo.ated
Other
Costs
Total C6t
Asslgned
Current
Fee / Reverue
Unit
surcharte or
Rryenue at full
C6t o, Servlc6
Prorectlon of
Raenues at
Curent Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
s
)
5 s
s
s
s
s
S
5 City of Tehachapi, CA
Building, Engineering dnd Planning Fees
Sldg-11
Bldt-12
Bldg-12
Bldg-13
Bldg-14
Eng-1
Planning -1
Planning -2
Plannint -3
Short-Term Rental Permit (initial)
Short-Term Rental Permit (subsequent)
ADA lnspection Permit
CAsp fe
Temporary Certiflcate of Occupancy
Sewer/Waterline Tie-in or Repair
Vesting Parcel Map
Time Extension
Tentatiw Parcel Map {stand alone)
Per application
Per applicstion
Per application
T&M - adual
cost (2s%)
Per application
Per application
Per application
Per application
Per applicatlon
1 4
1 4
Recovered
Revenue
volume
5 106
5 110
458
250
6,284
595
3,647
s 54
s
s
s
s
s
s202
s108
$2,775
s300
s1,s7s
s45
s23
s48
S57o
s3s7
s9,004
s99s
ss,221
s1s2
s78
s1s8
5 s
227
155
s 152
s
s
s
s
5 5
s 2,581
s7s
s77
(51s8)
*69291
(s3s7)
lg,991l
(sees)
(ss,221)
5227
(s2,681)
s7s
lndirect
Unh
Alltrad
Reenue at tull
Annurl C6t C.lculatlons
Cost ol
Fees
Total Cost
Assitned
Unit cost summary
Annual Surplus
(srbsldyl
Proiectlon of
Rsenues at
Unh
Surcharte or
Dlrect Unit
CGt
Current
tee / Revenue
nwanre at frl I
cct or servics
I
Annual surplus
(subsidy)
Proiection of
Revenues at
Curaent tees
s479,s53 L5
Capital Accounting Partners Page 8 of 8 BldgEngCostCalcs Service # Fee Name Uoit Actual work
Volume
(Xher
Costs