Agenda — Temecula City Council, February 22, 2022 (part 3 of 3)

3.0%
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0

3.0%
13 728
14 139
14 564
15 000
15 450
15 914
16 391
16 883
17 390
($13,728)
($14,139)
($14,564)
($15,000)
($15,450)
($15,914)
($16,391)
($16,883)
($17,390)
$39,156
$36,161
$32,799
$29,051
$24,897
$20,314
$15,282
$168,790
$162,789
(1) Reflects annual escalation at 3.5% for operating expenses, service amenities, and monitoring fee; 2.0% for property taxes; and 0.0% for replacement reserves.
(2) KMA assumption of escalation factors.
$39,156 $36,161 $32,799 $29,051 $24,897 $20,314 $15,282 $168,790 $162,789 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename is\Temecula_Vine Creek_v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 22

TABLE 5

CASH FLOW PROJECTION

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
I. Gross Scheduled Income (GSI)
Other Income
(Less) Vacancy
II. Effective Gross Income (EGI)
(Less) Operating Expenses (1)
III. Net Operating Income (NOI)
(Less) Debt Service
IV. Project Cash Flow
V. Asset Management Fees (2)
(Less) Limited Partner Asset Mgmt. Fee
(Less) General Partner Asset Mgmt. Fee
Total
VI. Net Cash Flow
VII. Developer Fee Repayment
Vill. Cash Flow Available for Distribution
38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

2.5% $1,387,190 $1,421,869 $1,457,416 $1,493,851 $1,531,198 $1,569,478 $1,608,715 $1,648,932 $1,690,156

2.5% $22,440 $23,001 $23,576 $24,166 $24,770 $25,389 $26,024 $26,674 $27,341

5.0% 70 481 72 244 74 050 75 901 77 798 79 743 81 737 83 780 85 875 $1,339,148 $1,372,627 $1,406,943 $1,442,116 $1,478,169 $1,515,123 $1,553,001 $1,591,826 $1,631,622 ($1,164,971) ($1,204,983) ($1,246,390) ($1,289,242) ($1,333,589) ($1,379,483) ($1,426,978) ($1,476,130) ($1,526,997) $174,177 $167,644 $160,552 $152,874 $144,580 $135,641 $126,024 $115,697 $104,625 $174,177 $167,644 $160,552 $152,874 $144,580 $135,641 $126,024 $115,697 $104,625

3.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

3.0% 17 911 18 449 19 002 19 572 20 159 20 764 21 387 22 029 22 690 ($17,911) ($18,449) ($19,002) ($19,572) ($20,159) ($20,764) ($21,387) ($22,029) ($22,690) $156,266 $149,196 $141,550 $133,302 $124,421 $114,876 $104,637 $93,668 $81,936 (1) Reflects annual escalation at 3.5% for operating expenses, service amenities, and monitoring fee; 2.0% for property taxes; and 0.0% for replacement reserves.
(2) KMA assumption of escalation factors.
$156,266 $149,196 $141,550 $133,302 $124,421 $114,876 $104,637 $93,668 $81,936 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename is\Temecula_Vine Creek_v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 23

TABLE 5

CASH FLOW PROJECTION

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

2.5% $1,732,410 $1,775,720 $1,820,113 $1,865,616 $1,912,256 $1,960,062 $2,009,064 $2,059,291 $2,110,773

2.5% $28,025 $28,725 $29,443 $30,179 $30,934 $31,707 $32,500 $33,313 $34,145

5.0% 88 022 90 222 92 478 94 790 97 160 99 588 102 078 104 630 107 246 $1,672,413 $1,714,223 $1,757,078 $1,801,005 $1,846,031 $1,892,181 $1,939,486 $1,987,973 $2,037,672 ($1,579,639) ($1,634,118) ($1,690,498) ($1,748,845) ($1,809,229) ($1,871,720) ($1,936,392) ($2,003,322) ($2,072,587) $92,774 $80,105 $66,581 $52,160 $36,802 $20,461 $3,094 ($15,349) ($34,915) $92,774 $80,105 $66,581 $52,160 $36,802 $20,461 $3,094 ($15,349) ($34,915)

3.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

3.0% 23 370 24 071 24 794 25 537 26 303 27 093 27 905 28 742 29 605 ($23,370) ($24,071) ($24,794) ($25,537) ($26,303) ($27,093) ($27,905) ($28,742) ($29,605) $69,404 $56,034 $41,787 $26,623 $10,498 ($6,631) ($24,812) ($44,091) ($64,520) (1) Reflects annual escalation at 3.5% for operating expenses, service amenities, and monitoring fee; 2.0% for property taxes; and 0.0% for replacement reserves.
(2) KMA assumption of escalation factors.
$69,404 $56,034 $41,787 $26,623 $10,498
$0 $0 $0 $0
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename is\Temecula_Vine Creek_v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 24

TABLE 6

PUBLIC LOAN REPAYMENT SCHEDULE

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 I. Cash Flow Available for Distribution
$26,876
$28,705
$30,468
$32,159
$33,772
$35,302
$36,741
$38,083
$39,320
II. Allocated to Pay Down City/County Notes

50.0%
$13,438
$14,353
$15,234
$16,080
$16,886
$17,651
$18,370
$19,041
$19,660
III. County PLHA Loan
---- ------------I
Beginning Balance
1 $2,824,043
$2,847,818
$2,871,332
$2,894,598
$2,917,626
$2,940,429
$2,963,021
$2,985,414
Interest

1.0%
--$2,800,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

29.4%
3 957
4 226
4 485
4 734
4 972
5 197
5 409
5 606
5 788
Ending Balance
$2,824,043
$2,847,818
$2,871,332
$2,894,598
$2,917,626
$2,940,429
$2,963,021
$2,985,414
$3,007,626
IV. City Deferred Fee Loan
Beginning Balance
------------
$698,000
$709,459
$720,272
$730,463
$740,057
$749,083
$757,569
$765,547
$773,052
Interest

3.0%
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

70.6%
9 481
10 127
10 749
11 345
11 914
12 454
12 962
13 435
13 872
Ending Balance
$709,459
$720,272
$730,463
$740,057
$749,083
$757,569
$765,547
$773,052
$780,121
V. City Permanent Loan
Beginning Balance
------- --------:

I
$5,461,060
$5,620,120
$5,779,180
$5,938,240
$6,097,300
$6,256,360
$6,415,420
$6,574,480
Interest

3.0%
--$5,302,000
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$5,461,060
$5,620,120
$5,779,180
$5,938,240
$6,097,300
$6,256,360
$6,415,420
$6,574,480
$6,733,540
VI. City Purchase Money Loan
Beginning Balance
----------------:

I $710,000 I
$731,300
$752,600
$773,900
$795,200
$816,500
$837,800
$859,100
$880,400
Interest

3.0%
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$731,300
$752,600
$773,900
$795,200
$816,500
$837,800
$859,100
$880,400
$901,700
VII. Total Cash Flow to City - NPV Years 1-55 (2) 10% $228,000 (1) After repayment of deferred Developer Fee (if any), reflects pro rata portion of 50% of public agencies' share of cash flow. The City Deferred Fee Loan receives 100%
of the City's share of residual receipts. After repayment of the City Deferred Fee Loan, the City's share of residual receipts is split pro rata between the City Permanent
Loan and the City Purchase Money Loan.
(2) Includes Year 55 loan pay-offs.

Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: is Temecula -Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 25

TABLE 6

PUBLIC LOAN REPAYMENT SCHEDULE

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
I. Cash Flow Available for Distribution
$40,446
$41,453
$42,332
$43,075
$43,672
$44,116
$52,185
$52,523
$52,683
$52,654
II. Allocated to Pay Down City/County Notes

50.0%
$20,223
$20,726
$21,166
$21,537
$21,836
$22,058
$26,092
$26,262
$26,342
$26,327
III. County PLHA Loan
Beginning Balance
$3,007,626
$3,029,672
$3,051,569
$3,073,338
$3,094,996
$3,116,567
$3,138,073
$3,158,391
$3,178,658
$3,198,903
Interest

1.0%
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

29.4%
5 954
6 102
6 232
6 341
6 429
6 494
7 682
7 732
7 756
7 751
Ending Balance
$3,029,672
$3,051,569
$3,073,338
$3,094,996
$3,116,567
$3,138,073
$3,158,391
$3,178,658
$3,198,903
$3,219,151
IV. City Deferred Fee Loan
Beginning Balance
$780,121
$786,792
$793,108
$799,114
$804,858
$810,391
$815,767
$818,297
$820,708
$823,062
Interest

3.0%
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

70.6%
14 269
14 624
14 934
15 196
15 407
15 563
18 410
18 529
18 586
18 576
Ending Balance
$786,792
$793,108
$799,114
$804,858
$810,391
$815,767
$818,297
$820,708
$823,062
$825,426
V. City Permanent Loan
Beginning Balance
$6,733,540
$6,892,600
$7,051,660
$7,210,720
$7,369,780
$7,528,840
$7,687,900
$7,846,960
$8,006,020
$8,165,080
Interest

3.0%
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$6,892,600
$7,051,660
$7,210,720
$7,369,780
$7,528,840
$7,687,900
$7,846,960
$8,006,020
$8,165,080
$8,324,140
VI. City Purchase Money Loan
Beginning Balance
$901,700
$923,000
$944,300
$965,600
$986,900
$1,008,200
$1,029,500
$1,050,800
$1,072,100
$1,093,400
Interest

3.0%
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
$_0
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$923,000
$944,300
$965,600
$986,900
$1,008,200
$1,029,500
$1,050,800
$1,072,100
$1,093,400
$1,114,700
VII. Total Cash Flow to City - NPV Years 1-55 (2) 10%
(1) After repayment of deferred Developer Fee (if any), reflects pro rata portion of 50% of public agencies' share of cash flow. The City Deferred Fee Loan receives 100%
of the City's share of residual receipts. After repayment of the City Deferred Fee Loan, the City's share of residual receipts is split pro rata between the City Permanent
Loan and the City Purchase Money Loan.
(2) Includes Year 55 loan pay-offs.

Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: is Temecula -Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 26

TABLE 6

PUBLIC LOAN REPAYMENT SCHEDULE

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 I. Cash Flow Available for Distribution
$52,425
$51,983
$51,315
$50,410
$49,252
$47,827
$46,122
$44,119
$41,803
II. Allocated to Pay Down City/County Notes

50.0%
$26,212
$25,991
$25,658
$25,205
$24,626
$23,914
$23,061
$22,059
$20,901
III. County PLHA Loan
Beginning Balance
$3,219,151
$3,239,434
$3,259,781
$3,280,227
$3,300,806
$3,321,555
$3,342,514
$3,363,725
$3,385,230
Interest

1.0%
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

29.4%
7 718
7 653
7 554
7 421
7 251
7 041
6 790
6 495
6 154
Ending Balance
$3,239,434
$3,259,781
$3,280,227
$3,300,806
$3,321,555
$3,342,514
$3,363,725
$3,385,230
$3,407,076
IV. City Deferred Fee Loan
Beginning Balance
$825,426
$827,871
$830,472
$833,309
$836,465
$840,030
$844,097
$848,766
$854,142
Interest

3.0%
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

70.6%
18 495
18 339
18 103
17 784
17 375
16 873
16 271
15 565
14 747
Ending Balance
$827,871
$830,472
$833,309
$836,465
$840,030
$844,097
$848,766
$854,142
$860,334
V. City Permanent Loan
Beginning Balance
$8,324,140
$8,483,200
$8,642,260
$8,801,320
$8,960,380
$9,119,440
$9,278,500
$9,437,560
$9,596,620
Interest

3.0%
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
$0
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$8,483,200
$8,642,260
$8,801,320
$8,960,380
$9,119,440
$9,278,500
$9,437,560
$9,596,620
$9,755,680
VI. City Purchase Money Loan
Beginning Balance
$1,114,700
$1,136,000
$1,157,300
$1,178,600
$1,199,900
$1,221,200
$1,242,500
$1,263,800
$1,285,100
Interest

3.0%
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$1,136,000
$1,157,300
$1,178,600
$1,199,900
$1,221,200
$1,242,500
$1,263,800
$1,285,100
$1,306,400
VII. Total Cash Flow to City - NPV Years 1-55 (2) 10%
(1) After repayment of deferred Developer Fee (if any), reflects pro rata portion of 50% of public agencies' share of cash flow. The City Deferred Fee Loan receives 100%
of the City's share of residual receipts. After repayment of the City Deferred Fee Loan, the City's share of residual receipts is split pro rata between the City Permanent
Loan and the City Purchase Money Loan.
(2) Includes Year 55 loan pay-offs.

Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: is Temecula -Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 27

TABLE 6

PUBLIC LOAN REPAYMENT SCHEDULE

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 I. Cash Flow Available for Distribution
$39,156
$36,161
$32,799
$29,051
$24,897
$20,314
$15,282
$168,790
$162,789
II. Allocated to Pay Down City/County Notes

50.0%
$19,578
$18,081
$16,400
$14,526
$12,448
$10,157
$7,641
$84,395
$81,394
III. County PLHA Loan
Beginning Balance
$3,407,076
$3,429,312
$3,451,988
$3,475,160
$3,498,883
$3,523,218
$3,548,227
$3,573,978
$3,577,130
Interest

1.0%
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

29.4%
5 764
5 323
4 828
4 277
3 665
2 991
2 250
24 848
23 965
Ending Balance
$3,429,312
$3,451,988
$3,475,160
$3,498,883
$3,523,218
$3,548,227
$3,573,978
$3,577,130
$3,581,165
IV. City Deferred Fee Loan
Beginning Balance
$860,334
$867,460
$875,643
$885,012
$895,703
$907,860
$921,634
$937,182
$898,575
Interest

3.0%
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

70.6%
13 814
12 757
11 571
10 249
8 783
7 167
5 391
59 547
57 430
Ending Balance
$867,460
$875,643
$885,012
$895,703
$907,860
$921,634
$937,182
$898,575
$862,086
V. City Permanent Loan
Beginning Balance
$9,755,680
$9,914,740
$10,073,800
$10,232,860
$10,391,920
$10,550,980
$10,710,040
$10,869,100
$11,028,160
Interest

3.0%
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
$0
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$9,914,740
$10,073,800
$10,232,860
$10,391,920
$10,550,980
$10,710,040
$10,869,100
$11,028,160
$11,187,220
VI. City Purchase Money Loan
Beginning Balance
$1,306,400
$1,327,700
$1,349,000
$1,370,300
$1,391,600
$1,412,900
$1,434,200
$1,455,500
$1,476,800
Interest

3.0%
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$1,327,700
$1,349,000
$1,370,300
$1,391,600
$1,412,900
$1,434,200
$1,455,500
$1,476,800
$1,498,100
VII. Total Cash Flow to City - NPV Years 1-55 (2) 10%
(1) After repayment of deferred Developer Fee (if any), reflects pro rata portion of 50% of public agencies' share of cash flow. The City Deferred Fee Loan receives 100%
of the City's share of residual receipts. After repayment of the City Deferred Fee Loan, the City's share of residual receipts is split pro rata between the City Permanent
Loan and the City Purchase Money Loan.
(2) Includes Year 55 loan pay-offs.

Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: is Temecula -Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 28

TABLE 6

PUBLIC LOAN REPAYMENT SCHEDULE

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 I. Cash Flow Available for Distribution
$156,266
$149,196
$141,550
$133,302
$124,421
$114,876
$104,637
$93,668
$81,936
II. Allocated to Pay Down City/County Notes

50.0%
$78,133
$74,598
$70,775
$66,651
$62,210
$57,438
$52,318
$46,834
$40,968
III. County PLHA Loan
Beginning Balance
$3,581,165
$3,586,160
$3,592,197
$3,599,359
$3,607,735
$3,617,418
$3,628,507
$3,641,103
$3,655,314
Interest

1.0%
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

29.4%
23 004
21 964
20 838
19 624
18 316
16 911
15 404
13 789
12 062
Ending Balance
$3,586,160
$3,592,197
$3,599,359
$3,607,735
$3,617,418
$3,628,507
$3,641,103
$3,655,314
$3,671,252
IV. City Deferred Fee Loan
Beginning Balance
$862,086
$827,897
$796,203
$767,206
$741,119
$718,165
$698,578
$682,604
$670,037
Interest

3.0%
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
$20,478
$20,101
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

70.6%
55 129
52 634
49 937
47 027
43 894
40 527
36 914
33 045
28 906
Ending Balance
$827,897
$796,203
$767,206
$741,119
$718,165
$698,578
$682,604
$670,037
$661,232
V. City Permanent Loan
Beginning Balance
$11,187,220
$11,346,280
$11,505,340
$11,664,400
$11,823,460
$11,982,520
$12,141,580
$12,300,640
$12,459,700
Interest

3.0%
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$11,346,280
$11,505,340
$11,664,400
$11,823,460
$11,982,520
$12,141,580
$12,300,640
$12,459,700
$12,618,760
VI. City Purchase Money Loan
Beginning Balance
$1,498,100
$1,519,400
$1,540,700
$1,562,000
$1,583,300
$1,604,600
$1,625,900
$1,647,200
$1,668,500
Interest

3.0%
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$1,519,400
$1,540,700
$1,562,000
$1,583,300
$1,604,600
$1,625,900
$1,647,200
$1,668,500
$1,689,800
VII. Total Cash Flow to City - NPV Years 1-55 (2) 10%
(1) After repayment of deferred Developer Fee (if any), reflects pro rata portion of 50% of public agencies' share of cash flow. The City Deferred Fee Loan receives 100%
of the City's share of residual receipts. After repayment of the City Deferred Fee Loan, the City's share of residual receipts is split pro rata between the City Permanent
Loan and the City Purchase Money Loan.
(2) Includes Year 55 loan pay-offs.

Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: is Temecula -Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 29

TABLE 6

PUBLIC LOAN REPAYMENT SCHEDULE

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 I. Cash Flow Available for Distribution
$69,404
$56,034
$41,787
$26,623
$10,498
$0
$0
$0
$0
II. Allocated to Pay Down City/County Notes

50.0%
$34,702
$28,017
$20,894
$13,311
$5,249
$0
$0
$0
$0
III. County PLHA Loan
Beginning Balance
$3,671,252
$3,689,035
$3,708,786
$3,730,634
$3,754,715
$3,781,169
$3,809,169
$3,837,169
$3,865,169
Interest

1.0%
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

29.4%
10 217
8 249
6 152
3 919
1 545
LO
LO
L
LO
Ending Balance
$3,689,035
$3,708,786
$3,730,634
$3,754,715
$3,781,169
$3,809,169
$3,837,169
$3,865,169 ;
$3,893,169
IV. City Deferred Fee Loan
Beginning Balance
$661,232
$656,585
$656,514
$661,468
$671,919
$688,373
$709,024
$729,964
$750,904
Interest

3.0%
$19,837
$19,698
$19,695
$19,844
$20,158
$20,651
$20,940
$20,940
$20,940
(Less) Cash Flow Credit (1)

70.6%
24 485
19 768
14 742
9 392
3 704
LO
LO
L
LO
Ending Balance
$656,585
$656,514
$661,468
$671,919
$688,373
$709,024
$729,964
$750,904 ;
____
$771,844
V. City Permanent Loan
Beginning Balance
$12,618,760
$12,777,820
$12,936,880
$13,095,940
$13,255,000
$13,414,060
$13,573,120
$13,732,180
$13,891,240
Interest

3.0%
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
$159,060
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
$0
$0
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
Ending Balance
$12,777,820
$12,936,880
$13,095,940
$13,255,000
$13,414,060
$13,573,120
$13,732,180
$13,891,240 ; $14,050,300
VI. City Purchase Money Loan
Beginning Balance
$1,689,800
$1,711,100
$1,732,400
$1,753,700
$1,775,000
$1,796,300
$1,817,600
$1,838,900
$1,860,200
Interest

3.0%
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
$21,300
(Less) Cash Flow Credit
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
L
LO
Ending Balance
$1,711,100
$1,732,400
$1,753,700
$1,775,000
$1,796,300
$1,817,600
$1,838,900
$1,860,200 ;
$1,881,500
VII. Total Cash Flow to City - NPV Years 1-55 (2) 10%
(1) After repayment of deferred Developer Fee (if any), reflects pro rata portion of 50% of public agencies' share of cash flow. The City Deferred Fee Loan receives 100%
of the City's share of residual receipts. After repayment of the City Deferred Fee Loan, the City's share of residual receipts is split pro rata between the City Permanent
Loan and the City Purchase Money Loan.
(2) Includes Year 55 loan pay-offs.

Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: is Temecula -Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 30

WORKSHEET A
SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE RENTS (1)

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA

LOAN AGREEMENT
Extremely Low - 30% AMI
Very Low - 50% AMI
Low - 60% AMI
1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom
1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom
1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom
$398 $434 $471
$708 $783 $859
$863 $957 $1,053
1 Bedroom
3 Units
$377
3 Units/$377
<
a
2 Bedroom
9 Units
$444
0 3 Bedroom
6 Units
$506
cn
Total - 30% AMI
18 Units
1 Bedroom
1 Unit
$526
Q
2 Bedroom
3 Units
$622
3 Units/$622
o
3 Bedroom
2 Units
—
$712
1 Unit/$712
Total - 40% AMI
6 Units
1 Bedroom
1 Unit
$673
1 Unit/$673
<
a
2 Bedroom
3 Units
$799
o
3 Bedroom
2 Units
—
$917
u,
Total - 50% AMI
6 Units
1 Bedroom
2 Units
$821
2 Units/$821
<
a
2 Bedroom
17 Units
$977
c
3 Bedroom
10 Units
$1,123
Total - 60% AMI
29 Units
Total Units (2)
59 Units
3 Units @ 30% AMI
5 Units @ 50% AMI
2 Units @ 60% AMI
(1) Reflects 2021 California Redevelopment Law (CRL) rents and Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) rents net of monthly utility allowance. See Worksheets B through E. (2) Excludes one (1) Manager unit.

Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates Inc.

Filename is Temecula —Vine Creek_v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 31

WORKSHEET B
RESTRICTED RENTS - 30% AMI, 2021

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
Number of Bedrooms 1 2 3
A. California Redevelopment Law
Percent of AMI
30%
30%
30%
Assumed Family Size

2.0 3.0

4.0 Household Income (Rounded)
$18,600
$20,925
$23,250
Income Allocation to Housing
30%
30%
30%
Monthly Housing Cost
$465
$523
$581
(Less) Utility Allowance (1)
67 89
110
Maximum Monthly Rent $398 $434 $471
B. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program
Percent of AMI
30%
30%
30%
Assumed Family Size

1.5 3.0

4.5 Household Income
$17,775
$21,330
$24,660
Income Allocation to Housing
30%
30%
30%
Monthly Housing Cost
$444
$533
$616
(Less) Utility Allowance (1)
67 89
110
Maximum Monthly Rent $377 $444 $506
(1) Per Developer correspondence received 1/25/22, reflects profile per Housing Authority of the County of Riverside utility allowance profile effective 7/1/20.

Monthly Utility
One
Two
Three
Gas Heating
$17
$19
$20
Gas Cooking
$4
$6
$7
Other Electric (SCE)
$19
$28
$37
Air Conditioning
$14
$19
$25
Gas Water Heating
$8
$12
$16
Natural Gas Charge
$5
Total
$67
$89
$110
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: is Temecula —Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 32

WORKSHEET C
RESTRICTED RENTS - 40% AMI, 2021

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
Number of Bedrooms 1 2 3
A. California Redevelopment Law
Percent of AMI
50%
50%
50%
Assumed Family Size

2.0 3.0

4.0 Household Income (Rounded)
$31,000
$34,875
$38,750
Income Allocation to Housing
30%
30%
30%
Monthly Housing Cost
$775
$872
$969
(Less) Utility Allowance (1)
67 89
110
Maximum Monthly Rent $708 $783 $859
B. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program
Percent of AMI
40%
40%
40%
Assumed Family Size

1.5 3.0

4.5 Household Income
$23,700
$28,440
$32,880
Income Allocation to Housing
30%
30%
30%
Monthly Housing Cost
$593
$711
$822
(Less) Utility Allowance (1)
67 89
110
Maximum Monthly Rent $526 $622 $712
(1) Per Developer correspondence received 1/25/22, reflects profile per Housing Authority of the County of Riverside utility allowance profile effective 7/1/20.

Filename: is Temecula —Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 33

WORKSHEET D
RESTRICTED RENTS - 50% AMI, 2021

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
Number of Bedrooms 1 2 3
A. California Redevelopment Law
Percent of AMI
50%
50%
50%
Assumed Family Size

2.0 3.0

1.5 3.0

4.5 Household Income
$29,625
$35,550
$41,100
Income Allocation to Housing
30%
30%
30%
Monthly Housing Cost
$740
$888
$1,027
(Less) Utility Allowance (1)
67 89
110
Maximum Monthly Rent $673 $799 $917
(1) Per Developer correspondence received 1/25/22, reflects profile per Housing Authority of the County of Riverside utility allowance profile effective 7/1/20.

Filename: is Temecula —Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 34

WORKSHEET E
RESTRICTED RENTS - 60% AMI, 2021

VINE CREEK APARTMENTS

CITY OF TEMECULA
Number of Bedrooms 1 2 3
A. California Redevelopment Law
Percent of AMI
60%
60%
60%
Assumed Family Size

2.0 3.0

4.0 Household Income (Rounded)
$37,200
$41,850
$46,500
Income Allocation to Housing
30%
30%
30%
Monthly Housing Cost
$930
$1,046
$1,163
(Less) Utility Allowance (1)
67 89
110
Maximum Monthly Rent $863 $957 $1,053
B. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program
Percent of AMI
60%
60%
60%
Assumed Family Size

1.5 3.0

4.5 Household Income
$35,550
$42,660
$49,320
Income Allocation to Housing
30%
30%
30%
Monthly Housing Cost
$888
$1,066
$1,233
(Less) Utility Allowance (1)
67 89
110
Maximum Monthly Rent $821 $977 $1,123
(1) Per Developer correspondence received 1/25/22, reflects profile per Housing Authority of the County of Riverside utility allowance profile effective 7/1/20.

Filename: is Temecula —Vine Creek_ v4_33433;1/31/2022;rsp Page 35

Item No. 18

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager
DATE: February 22, 2022
SUBJECT: Adopt an Interim Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Establishing Emergency Regulations Related to Urban Lot Splits and Housing Units Built in Accordance With Senate Bill 9, Declaring the Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3) and Government Code Section 65852.21(J) PREPARED BY: Matt Peters, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt by a 4/5 vote the urgency ordinance entitled:

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-

AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENACTED
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858

ESTABLISHING EMERGENCY REGULATIONS RELATED

TO URBAN LOT SPLITS AND HOUSING UNITS BUILT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9, DECLARING THE

URGENCY THEREOF AND MAKING A DETERMINATION

OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES
SECTIONS 15061(B)(3) AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
65852.21(J)

SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE: SB 9 specifically authorizes local agencies to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards consistent with the bill's provisions, and to adopt an ordinance to implement its provisions. The default standards contained in the new state law lack sufficient objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards to preserve the health, welfare and safety of the community. The City of Temecula desires to clarify the objective zoning and design standards that will apply to the ministerial review of qualifying urban lot splits and residential developments in the City's single-family residential zones.

BACKGROUND:

Current zoning regulations permit up to three units on a parcel zoned for a single-family dwelling:
one primary dwelling; one Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU); and one Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU).

Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) was signed by Governor Newsom on September 16, 2021 and became effective January 1, 2022 (see Attachment 1). It requires that a local jurisdiction allow ministerial approval (no discretionary review) of two units on parcels zoned for single family dwellings per lot and/or the subdivision of a single-family zoned parcel into two equal sized parcels (a 40 to 60 percent split of lot size is allowed). This type of subdivision ("urban lot split") may result in each lot containing a duplex or two detached residential units.

SB 9 allows cities to adopt objective development standards that regulate such projects provided they do not conflict with the Senate Bill. All new development resulting from an urban lot split must follow the City's Objective Design Standards adopted by City Council (Ordinance 2022-02), and City Council (Resolution 2022-08).

ANALYSIS:

If the City Council adopts the proposed Interim Urgency Ordinance at the February 22, 2022 meeting and the City Council wishes to proceed with the first extension, such an extension can be scheduled for a Public Hearing at the March 22, 2022 City Council meeting. But to comply with the extension requirement, the City would have to take action on a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the ordinance. This report would be scheduled for the March 8, 2022 City Council meeting.

The zones in the City where SB 9 projects would be permitted to develop include the Hillside Residential (HR), Rural Residential (RR), Very Low Density Residential (VL), Low Density Residential (L-1 and L-2), and Low Medium Density Residential (LM) zoning districts, as well as areas within Specific Plans and Planned Development Overlay Areas that are limited to single family residential uses.

Subject to certain exceptions, properties that are identified in the General Plan as being in a "very high fire hazard severity zone" and/or are located within a federally designated 100-year floodplain are excluded from SB 9 projects. In addition, per SB 9, SB 9 projects are also not allowed in the several other areas, including but not limited to earthquake study zones, prime agricultural lands, hazardous waste sites, and historic districts and/or properties with historic resources.

Objective Development Standards — SB 9 Housing Development Certain standards, regulations and provisions are established in SB 9 that the City must enforce.

These features of the Senate Bill are listed below:

• Housing. The City must allow ministerial approval of two units in single-family zones per lot and/or the subdivision of an existing single-family zoned parcel into two approximately equal sized parcels (a 40 to 60 percent split of lot size is allowed). • Preservation of Certain Types of Housing. The SB 9 project cannot require the demolition or alteration of any of the following: (1) rent controlled units, (2) affordable units, (3) units occupied by tenants within the last three years; or (4) units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the last 15 years. • Setbacks. The City must allow setbacks of up to 4 feet from side and rear lot lines. The City is allowed to impose front yards setbacks, provided that the front yard setback does not preclude the development of up to two units of at least 800 square feet of floor area each. The City cannot establish a setback to/for existing structures or structures constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. • Parking. The City can only require 1 off-street parking space per lot unless the parcel is located within %2 mile of a high -quality transit corridor or major transit stop or there is a car share within one block of the parcel.
• Existing Unit Protections. The City must not allow the demolition of more than 25 percent of an existing unit's exterior structural walls, unless permitted by local ordinance or the site has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. The interim urgency ordinance includes a provision that prohibits demolishing more than 25 percent of an existing unit as a means of preserving existing housing stock and maintaining current neighborhood appearances as much as possible.
• Use Restrictions. The City must prohibit any non-residential uses, short-term rentals (less than 30-day tenancy), and subsequent urban lot splits. The City already prohibits short term rentals in the City. The City must require an applicant for an urban lot split to sign an affidavit stating that the owner intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for at least three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split. The City must also mandate continual access to public rights -of -way. • Housing Element Report. The City must report the number of units developed pursuant to SB 9 in its Annual Housing Report.

As discussed previously, the City may adopt objective development standards as long as they do not preclude the development of up to two units of at least 800 square feet of floor area each. The City recently adopted Objective Design Standards that apply to multi -family residential projects and could apply to SB 9 projects. Since the City has some authority to adopt objective development standards, it is considered prudent to apply any provisions that could increase community aesthetics as well as promote vehicular and pedestrian safety, emergency response, housing affordability, and compatibility with existing neighborhoods.

The following are recommended development standards that have been included in the attached Interim Urgency Ordinance as supplemental to those standards established in SB 9:

1. All new development resulting from an urban lot split must comply with the City's Objective Design Standards adopted by City Council (Ordinance 2022-02, and City Council Resolution 2022-08, if the development meets the definition of a multi -unit residential development.

2. Non-public utility electrical elements such as wires, conduits, junction boxes, transformers, ballasts, and switch and panel boxes shall be concealed from view from adjacent public rights -of -way.

3. All flashing, sheet metal vents, and pipe stacks shall be painted to match the adjacent roof or wall material.

4. Pedestrian access to a public street or alley shall be provided with an exterior pedestrian pathway from the primary entrances of each unit to the adjoining sidewalk, street, or alley.

5. The maximum unit size for any proposed development on an urban lot split shall be 1,200 square feet. Establishing a maximum unit size will promote the intent and purpose of the law (to increase the number of affordable housing units) since smaller homes are considered more affordable.

6. Dwellings proposed in accordance with SB 9 shall be limited to 16 feet of height and consist of no more than one story. It is presumed that single story dwellings will have fewer potential impacts to the existing views and have less construction costs resulting in more affordable housing.

7. Any duplex or other dwelling unit built per the provisions of SB 9 shall provide a 10-foot separation between other dwelling units on the same lot. (Note: this will promote usable open space areas, and reduce architectural mass and bulk).

8. If the project involves an urban lot split, one of the two parcels created shall include a deed restriction for one income restricted dwelling unit that shall be rented or leased at an affordable rent for very low, low or moderate -income households (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50053). This means that if there is urban lot split that results in four units (two on each lot), one of the four units will be subject to a deed restriction. The deed restriction shall remain in place for a period of not less than fifty-five years. Upon request from the City, the property owner shall furnish a copy of the rental or lease agreement of the deed restricted unit. Execution and recording of a covenant, supplied by the City and subject to approval by the City Attorney shall be required. This requirement is being recommended to ensure that the new units meet the intention of State law to increase the supply of affordable housing, and to help the City meet its assigned Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA) of 4,193 units to be accommodated during the next eight -year housing cycle from 2021-2029.

Subdivision/Urban Lot Split Provisions of SB 9
The following list identifies the major parameters pertaining to "urban lot splits" found in SB 9:
• Parcel Map. The City is required to ministerially approve an urban lot split through a parcel map for property that is located in a single family zone. • Parcel size. No more than two parcels can be created. The new parcels must be approximately equal in size, with one parcel being no smaller than 40 percent of the original parcel's size and each new parcel containing at least 1,200 square feet. • Further Subdivisions. A City can deny further subdivision of the new parcels or if the owner or someone is acting in concert with the owner has subdivided an adjacent parcel using an urban lot split.
• Objective Standards. The urban lot split must conform to all objective requirements of the subdivision map act unless exempted by SB 9. A City is not allowed to apply findings to an SB 9 tentative map or the parcel map.
• Public Improvements. The City cannot require dedications of right-of-way or offsite public improvements but can require utility easements and right-of-way access. • Use Restrictions. The City must restrict the newly created parcels to residential uses and require the owner to sign an affidavit committing to occupy one of the units as a principal residence for at least three years. These restrictions may be implemented through an ordinance applicable to urban lot splits or a requirement to record a restrictive covenant. • Preservation of Certain Type of Housing. The SB 9 urban lot split is not allowed if it would require the demolition or alteration of any of the following: (1) rent controlled units, (2) affordable units, (3) units occupied by tenants within the last three years, or (4) units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the last 15 years. • Correction of Non -conforming Zoning. The City cannot require the correction of non- conforming zoning conditions as a condition of parcel map approval. • Housing Element Report. The City must report the number of applications for urban lot splits in its annual Housing Element report.

In addition to the above mandates of SB 9, it is recommended that the City adopt the following objective development standards (included in the attached Interim Urgency Ordinance) for urban lot splits to promote logical land development:

1. No flag lots shall be created as a result of an urban lot split if the subject property is adjacent to an alley, located on a corner, or on a through lot.

2. The width of any lot resulting from an urban lot split shall not be less than 20 feet wide.

3. A proposed parcel map shall demonstrate ability to access the public right-of-way in perpetuity.

4. No lot resulting from an urban lot split shall have more than two residential units inclusive of any Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit.

It is important to note that SB 9 allows local Building Officials to deny a two -unit development project or urban lot split only by making a written finding, based on a preponderance of evidence, that the project would have a specific adverse impact on public health and safety or the physical environment, and that there is no feasible method to mitigate or avoid such an impact. A "specific adverse impact" must be significant, quantifiable, and direct, based on an objective written public health or safety standard that existed at the time of the project application was deemed complete.

Inconsistency with a City's General Plan or zoning ordinance does constitute a specific adverse impact. Staff will be reviewing these projects on a case by case basis to determine whether or not a specific adverse impact finding can be made.

URGENCY ORDINANCE:

Adoption of the attached Interim Urgency Ordinance means that the added protection developed by the City will be in place immediately and apply to any applications the City may receive for SB 9 projects for 45 days. State Urgency Ordinance provisions are structured so the during the 45- day period, further studies may be conducted to determine if additional standards or regulations are warranted. After 45 days, the City Council can extend the ordinance for another 320 days and another one-year extension of the ordinance is allowed after the 320-day extension. In summary, the City will have a total of up to two years to develop a permanent SB 9 ordinance.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The Interim Urgency Ordinance is exempted from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it can be seen with certainty that it has no likelihood of causing a significant negative effect on the environment and accordingly both the City Council's action of adopting this interim Ordinance and the effects derivative from that adoption are exempt from the application of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) (14 Cal. Code Regs 15061(b)(3)). Furthermore, this Interim Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.210).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Costs associated with the code amendment are covered by the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES:

Recommended Action:

That the City Council adopt, by at least a four -fifths vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2022-xx, establishing emergency regulations for SB 9 development projects.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

3. Council may elect not to adopt Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2022-xx.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Interim Urgency Ordinance 2022-xx

2. Senate Bill 9

ORDINANCE NO.2022-

AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENACTED
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858

ESTABLISHING EMERGENCY REGULATIONS RELATED

TO URBAN LOT SPLITS AND HOUSING UNITS BUILT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9, DECLARING THE

URGENCY THEREOF AND MAKING A DETERMINATION

OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(B)(3) AND GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65852.21(J)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Legislative Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine and declare that:

A. California state law allows a City to adopt an interim ordinance that imposes temporary restrictions on the approval of land use entitlements that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body or planning commission intends to study within a reasonable time. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858, this interim urgency zoning Ordinance must be adopted by not less than a four - fifths vote of the City Council and will be in effect for forty-five (45) days from the date of its adoption. The City Council may consider an extension of this interim Ordinance pursuant to the legal requirements provided in Government Code Section 65858.

B. On September 16, 2021 California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 9, entitled the "California Home Act", into law, which establishes a series of new regulations to allow for ministerial approval of two units on parcels located in single-family residential zones as outlined in Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7. SB 9 took effect on January 1, 2022.

C. SB 9 requires cities to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split and/or a proposed housing development containing a maximum of two residential units within a single-family residential zone, if the two -unit or subdivision project meets certain statutory criteria.

SB 9 specifies that proposed projects and subdivisions cannot be proposed in prohibited locations under Government Code Section 65913.4(a)(6)(B)-(K), such as in an earthquake fault zone, lands under conservation easement, a federally designated flood plain, and high fire hazard severity zones as defined under state law.

D. SB 9 further restricts the standards and regulations that local agencies may impose on qualifying two -unit or subdivision projects. In addition, SB 9 permits a local agency to deny a proposed two -unit or subdivision project only if the agency makes a written finding based on preponderance of the evidence that the proposed project would have a specific, adverse impact

upon public health and safety or the physical environment, which is a very high standard for municipalities to meet under the statute.

E. The City of Temecula's natural beauty, high quality of life, and diverse residential communities are uniquely valuable public resources. Some parcels within the City are also within high fire hazard severity zones, or other locations where increased density may cause safety concerns. The City has substantial interests in protecting the community against these hazards.

Unregulated or disorderly development represents an ever-increasing and true threat to the health, welfare and safety of the community.

F. SB 9 specifically authorizes local agencies to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards consistent with the bill's provisions, and to adopt an ordinance to implement its provisions. The default standards contained in the new state law lack sufficient objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards to preserve the health, welfare and safety of the community. The City of Temecula desires to clarify the objective zoning and design standards that will apply to the ministerial review of qualifying urban lot splits and residential developments in the City's single-family residential zones.

G. The City Council is concerned that under the City's current zoning standards and current general plan policies, the approval of qualifying urban lot splits and residential developments pursuant to SB 9 might cause a disproportionate public health, safety and welfare impact to the City of Temecula community and to its residents - including potential detrimental impacts on vehicular and pedestrian safety, emergency response, and housing affordability - without compensating benefits to the community.

H. The City Council finds that studies need to be conducted to determine the proper location, concentration, regulations, and other land use regulatory controls that need to be in place in order to ensure that the approval of qualifying urban lot splits and residential developments pursuant to SB 9 does not burden the City and its residents and that the procedures for allowing such uses need to be studied to enable the City to address and mitigate potential burdens on the communities affected by these developments.

I. The City Council finds that in order to best protect the immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, it is necessary for the City to immediately study and analyze the implications of approving qualifying urban lot splits and residential developments pursuant to SB 9 in the City.

J. To accomplish this, the City Council intends to impose, on an urgency basis, emergency regulations related to urban lot splits and residential developments proposed pursuant toSB9.

K. These emergency regulations will allow City staff, the City Council, property owners, and the people of the City of Temecula sufficient time to analyze the burdens that urban lot splits and residential developments proposed pursuant to SB 9 will have on the City so that the appropriate land use regulatory controls and zone changes can be adopted if needed. During this period, the City will be able to analyze their potential impacts on the public health. The City Council finds that these studies will help the City Council and the City's Planning Department

determine how best to prevent impacts to the public health, safety and welfare. The City Council further finds that these emergency regulations will allow time to evaluate the City's General Plan designations and policies, Housing Element programs, zoning measures or development standards and develop appropriate regulations for qualifying urban lot splits and residential developments in the City to achieve a reasonable level of assurance that there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall community and ensure positive outcomes for the City's residents, business community, property owners, and developers.

L. The City Council finds that it is necessary that this interim Ordinance take effect immediately as there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare.

Without this interim Ordinance, urban lot splits and residential developments proposed pursuant to SB 9 may be established in the City that may be in conflict with regulations ultimately adopted.

Without this interim Ordinance, such urban lot splits and residential developments may be allowed to develop within the City that are incompatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Therefore, a current and immediate threat to the public safety, health and welfare exists.

M. For the reasons specified above and all the evidence in the record, the City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare caused by the approval of qualifying urban lot splits and residential developments pursuant to SB 9 in the City, and that the approval of any entitlement to allow such type of use would constitute a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City.

SECTION 2. Adoption as an Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance. This interim Ordinance is adopted as an urgency zoning ordinance pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65858(a), and shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. Based upon the findings set forth in Section 1 of this interim Ordinance, the City Council finds and determines that the adoption of this interim Ordinance as an urgency ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of public health, safety and welfare pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Sections 65858(a) and 36937(b).

SECTION 3. Prohibition on SB 9 Projects that Fail to Comply with Certain Standards. Notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Temecula Municipal Code, SB 9 Development Projects, as defined herein, are prohibited unless the project complies with the following requirements:

A. Definitions. For the purposes of this interim Ordinance, certain words and phrases are defined as follows:
"Accessory Dwelling Unit" has the same meaning ascribed in California Government Code Section 65852.2, as the same may be amended from time to time.

2. "Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit" has the same meaning ascribed in California Government Code Section 65852.22, as the same may be amended from time to time.

3. "Primary Residence" means the original dwelling on the property.

4. "SB 9" means a state law passed by the California state senate and approved by the Governor on September 16, 2021. The bill amends Government Code section 66452.6 and adds Government Code sections 65852.21 and 66411.7.

5. "SB 9 Development Project" consists of an Urban Lot Split or development project proposed pursuant to the regulations set forth in SB 9.

6. "Urban Lot Split" means a parcel map subdivision permitted pursuant to the regulations set forth in SB 9 that creates no more than two parcels of approximately equal size.

B. Applicability: Ministerial Compliance Review.

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Temecula Municipal Code, the provisions of this interim Ordinance shall apply to SB 9 Development Projects and Urban Lot Splits that are proposed for lots in the Hillside Residential (HR), Rural Residential (RR), Very Low Density Residential (VL), Low Density Residential (L-1 and L-2), and Low Medium Density Residential (LM) zoning districts, as well as areas within Specific Plans and Planned Development Overlay Areas that are limited to single family residential uses. Except as expressly provided in this interim Ordinance or SB 9, all other regulations of the underlying zone of a property developed pursuant to SB 9 shall apply, along with all other applicable regulations from the Temecula Municipal Code.

2. Proposed SB 9 Development Projects shall be subject to ministerial review by the Community Development Director or his designee to determine whether the criteria for approval have been met. An Urban Lot Split shall be processed as a parcel map, but no discretionary review or public hearing shall be conducted if all required criteria have been met.

3. Notwithstanding Government Code Section 66411.1, the City shall not require dedications of rights -of -way or the construction of offsite improvements for the parcels being created as a condition of issuing a parcel map for an Urban Lot Split.

4. Applicants are required to submit an application, including any maps, records, or other documents required by the Community Development Director. Applicants must provide a sworn statement affirming eligibility with SB 9 regulations.

5. The City may, at the applicant's expense, conduct independent inquiries and investigation to ascertain the veracity of any or all portions of the sworn statement.

C. General Requirements. A property owner seeking approval of an SB 9 Development Project shall comply with the following general requirements:

1. SB 9 and all objective requirements of other applicable state law including the Subdivision Map Act.

2. The Temecula Municipal Code, including Titles 16 (Subdivisions), 15 (Buildings and Construction) and 17 (Zoning), except as expressly provided in SB 9 or in this interim Ordinance.

3. Execution and recording of a covenant, supplied by the City and subject to the approval of the City Attorney, that contains the following provisions:
a. Non-residential uses on the site shall be prohibited; b. The short term rental for periods less than 30 days of any units on the site shall be prohibited as provided in Section 17.06.030; C. Any subsequent Urban Lot Split of land that was previously subdivided with an Urban Lot Split shall be prohibited; d. Except as provided in Government Code Section 66411.7 for community land trusts and qualified nonprofit corporations, the owner of the property for which an Urban Lot Split is proposed shall sign an affidavit stating that the owner intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for at least three years from the date of the approval of the Urban Lot Split;
e. Ongoing compliance with all SB 9 requirements and restrictions shall be required;
f. Access to the public right-of-way shall be maintained in perpetuity; and
g. All required parking shall be maintained.

4. If the SB 9 Development Project involves an Urban Lot Split, one of the two parcels created shall include a deed restriction for one income restricted dwelling unit that shall be rented or leased at an affordable rent for very low, low or moderate -income households (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50053). The deed restriction shall remain in place for a period of not less than fifty-five years. Upon request from the City, the property owner shall furnish a copy of the rental or lease agreement for the deed restricted unit.

D. Objective Standards. All SB 9 Development Projects shall comply with the following objective standards:

1. All new development resulting from an urban lot split must comply with the City's Objective Design Standards adopted by City Council (Ordinance 2022-02, and City Council Resolution 2022-08 and their successor 5 ordinances and resolutions), to the extent those standards are consistent with SB 9 and this Interim Ordinance.

2. One enclosed or partially enclosed parking space is required for each unit created pursuant to the regulations in SB 9 and this interim Ordinance, unless the parcel upon which the unit is created is within one-half mile walking distance of a high quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the project. Required parking for an Urban Lot Split lot shall be accessed via an alley, if there is an alley adjacent to the lot.

3. The new lot line must be a straight line starting from the front property line to the rear property line, or side if it is a corner lot. There shall be no curves or angles when subdividing a lot.

4. Non-public utility electrical elements such as wires, conduits, junction boxes, transformers, ballasts, and switch and panel boxes shall be concealed from view from adjacent public rights -of -way.

5. All flashing, sheet metal vents, and pipe stacks shall be painted to match the adjacent roof or wall material.

6. Pedestrian access to a public street or alley shall be provided with an exterior pedestrian pathway from the primary entrances of each unit to the adjoining sidewalk, street, or alley.

7. More than 25 percent of the exterior structural walls of a Primary Residence shall not be demolished if the Primary Residence has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Development Project application.

8. No unit created pursuant to the regulations in SB 9 and this interim Ordinance shall exceed 16 feet and one story in height.

9. No unit created pursuant to the regulations in SB 9 and this interim Ordinance shall be more than 1,200 square feet in floor area. For the purposes of this interim Ordinance, basements shall count as floor area.

10. Any units created pursuant to the regulations in SB 9 and this interim Ordinance shall have a minimum four foot setback from all side and rear lot lines except as allowed by Government Code Section 65852.21.

11. Any units created pursuant to the regulations in SB 9 and this interim Ordinance shall be separated from any other units on the same lot by at least 10 feet.

12. An SB 9 Development Project shall not require the demolition or alteration of any of the following:
6 a. Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
b. Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity's valid exercise of its police power.

Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Development Project application. d. Housing units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the 15 years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Development Project application.

13. A SB 9 Development Project shall not be permitted on a parcel located in:
a. Prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the State Department of Conservation.
b. Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).

A very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, or within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 4202. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 51179, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development.
d. A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25356, unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, or State Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for residential use or residential mixed uses.

A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection

building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code), and by any local building department under Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
f. A special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the 1 percent annual chance flood (100-year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless either of the following are met: (1) the site has been subject to a Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the City, or (2) the site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter I of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
g. A regulatory floodway as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless the development has received a no -rise certification in accordance with Section

60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations. h. Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C.

Sec. 1531 et seq.), or other adopted natural resource protection plan.

Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code).
j. Lands under conservation easement.
k. A historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public

Resources Code, or a site that is designated or listed as a local landmark or historic property or district by the City.

14. SB 9 projects shall comply with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the MSHCP implementing agreement, and pay any applicable fees including any local development mitigation fee.

15. An Urban Lot Split shall comply with SB 9, the standards set forth above, and the following standards:
a. No lot resulting from an Urban Lot Split shall be smaller than 1,200 square feet.
b. No lot resulting from an Urban Lot Split shall have more than two residential units inclusive of any Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit.

C. The two lots resulting from an Urban Lot Split shall be approximately equal in size, and no smaller than 40 percent or larger than 60 percent of the lot area of the original parcel. d. No flag lots shall be created as a result of an Urban Lot Split if the subject property is adjacent to an alley, located on a corner, or on a through lot.

The width of any lot resulting from an Urban Lot Split shall not be less than 20 feet wide.
f. The proposed parcel map shall demonstrate the ability to access the public right-of-way in perpetuity.

E. Exceptions. The Community Development Director shall approve an exception to any of the standards specified in this interim Ordinance upon determining that complying with the standard would physically preclude the construction of up to two residential units per lot or would physically preclude either of the two residential units from being 800 square feet in floor area.

F. Denial. The Building Official may deny an application for an SB 9 Development Project upon making both of the following findings in writing based upon a preponderance of evidence:

The proposal would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety or the physical environment as defined and determined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2).

2. There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

SECTION 4. CEQA Finding. The City Council hereby finds, in the exercise of its independent judgment and analysis, that this interim Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it can be seen with certainty that this interim Ordinance has no likelihood of causing a significant negative effect on the environment and accordingly both the City Council's action of adopting this interim Ordinance and the effects derivative from that adoption are exempt from the application of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)). This interim Ordinance will provide temporary emergency regulations related to SB 9 Development Projects and Urban Lot Splits in the City in order to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant adverse environmental impacts during the term of the emergency regulations. There is no possibility that adopting this interim Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations and no environmental analysis is required. Furthermore, this interim Ordinance is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.210). The Community Development Director shall prepare and file a Notice of Exemption for this interim Ordinance.

SECTION 5. Planning Studies. City staff shall promptly commence the studies they may deem necessary and appropriate to make a recommendation to this City Council regarding the structuring of the General Plan, zoning and other necessary regulatory controls over SB 9 Development Projects within the City of Temecula. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(d), City staff shall prepare and submit for City Council adoption, at least ten (10) days prior to the expiration of this interim Ordinance, or any extension hereof, a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of this interim Ordinance.

SECTION 6. Extension of Time. The Community Development Director and the City Clerk's office shall undertake all actions legally necessary to extend this interim Ordinance in the event the studies desired by this City Council will not be concluded on or before the forty-fifth (45th) day subsequent to the adoption of this interim Ordinance.

SECTION 7. Effect of Ordinance. This interim Ordinance is intended to supersede any ordinance or resolution of the City of Temecula in conflict with the terms of this interim Ordinance; provided, however, that nothing contained in this interim Ordinance is intended to nor shall be construed to impair the prosecution or other enforcement action for violations of such ordinances.

SECTION 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this interim Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this interim Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this interim Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 9. Effective Date. This interim Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage. It shall be of no further force or effect forty-five (45) days from the date of its adoption unless extended pursuant to the legal requirements contained in Government Code Section 65858. 10 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of February, 2022.

ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Matt Rahn, Mayor
m

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022- was duly adopted and passed as an interim urgency ordinance at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22"d day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
12 Q STATE OF CALIFORNIA

LECI TIV, AUTHENTICATED
COUSun ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL
Senate Bill No. 9
CHAPTER 162
An act to amend Section 66452.6 of, and to add Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to, the Government Code, relating to land use.
[Approved by Governor September 16, 2021. Filed with
Secretary of State September 16, 2021.]

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 9, Atkins. Housing development: approvals.

The Planning and Zoning Law provides for the creation of accessory dwelling units by local ordinance, or, if a local agency has not adopted an ordinance, by ministerial approval, in accordance with specified standards and conditions.

This bill, among other things, would require a proposed housing development containing no more than 2 residential units within a single-family residential zone to be considered ministerially, without discretionary review or hearing, if the proposed housing development meets certain requirements, including, but not limited to, that the proposed housing development would not require demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income, that the proposed housing development does not allow for the demolition of more than 25% of the existing exterior structural walls, except as provided, and that the development is not located within a historic district, is not included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or is not within a site that is legally designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district.

The bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving the construction of 2 residential units, including, but not limited to, authorizing a local agency to impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, as defined, unless those standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to 2 units or physically precluding either of the 2 units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, prohibiting the imposition of setback requirements under certain circumstances, and setting maximum setback requirements under all other circumstances.

The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the local agency's processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps, and the modification of those maps. Under the Subdivision Map Act, an approved or conditionally approved tentative map expires 24 94 Ch. 162 —2
months after its approval or conditional approval or after any additional period of time as prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed an additional 12 months, except as provided.

This bill, among other things, would require a local agency to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split that meets certain requirements, including, but not limited to, that the urban lot split would not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income, that the parcel is located within a single-family residential zone, and that the parcel is not located within a historic district, is not included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or is not within a site that is legally designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district.

The bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving an urban lot split, including, but not limited to, authorizing a local agency to impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, as defined, unless those standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of 2 units, as defined, on either of the resulting parcels or physically precluding either of the 2 units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, prohibiting the imposition of setback requirements under certain circumstances, and setting maximum setback requirements under all other circumstances. The bill would require an applicant to sign an affidavit stating that they intend to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of 3 years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split, unless the applicant is a community land trust or a qualified nonprofit corporation, as specified. The bill would prohibit a local agency from imposing any additional owner occupancy standards on applicants. By requiring applicants to sign affidavits, thereby expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state -mandated local program.

The bill would also extend the limit on the additional period that may be provided by ordinance, as described above, from 12 months to 24 months and would make other conforming or nonsubstantive changes.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA does not apply to the approval of ministerial projects.

This bill, by establishing the ministerial review processes described above, would thereby exempt the approval of projects subject to those processes from CEQA.

The California Coastal Act of 1976 provides for the planning and regulation of development, under a coastal development permit process, within the coastal zone, as defined, that shall be based on various coastal resources planning and management policies set forth in the act. 94 Ch. 162
This bill would exempt a local agency from being required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for housing developments and urban lot splits pursuant to the above provisions.

By increasing the duties of local agencies with respect to land use regulations, the bill would impose a state -mandated local program.

The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 65852.21 is added to the Government Code, to read:
65852.21. (a) A proposed housing development containing no more than two residential units within a single-family residential zone shall be considered ministerially, without discretionary review or a hearing, if the proposed housing development meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The parcel subject to the proposed housing development is located within a city, the boundaries of which include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau.
(2) The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4. (3) Notwithstanding any provision of this section or any local law, the proposed housing development would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(A) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
(B) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity's valid exercise of its police power.
(C) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (4) The parcel subject to the proposed housing development is not a parcel on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner's rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
94 Ch. 162 —4
(5) The proposed housing development does not allow the demolition of more than 25 percent of the existing exterior structural walls, unless the housing development meets at least one of the following conditions:
(A) If a local ordinance so allows.
(B) The site has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (6) The development is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding any local law and except as provided in paragraph (2), a local agency may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards that do not conflict with this section.
(2) (A) The local agency shall not impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two units or that would physically preclude either of the two units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area.
(B) (i) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.
(ii) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), in all other circumstances not described in clause (i), a local agency may require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines.
(c) In addition to any conditions established in accordance with subdivision (b), a local agency may require any of the following conditions when considering an application for two residential units as provided for in this section:
(1) Off-street parking of up to one space per unit, except that a local agency shall not impose parking requirements in either of the following instances:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high -quality transit corridor, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop, as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel. (2) For residential units connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, a percolation test completed within the last 5 years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years. (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a local agency may deny a proposed housing development project if the building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is 94 5 — Ch. 162
no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.
(e) A local agency shall require that a rental of any unit created pursuant to this section be for a term longer than 30 days.
(f) Notwithstanding Section 65852.2 or 65852.22, a local agency shall not be required to permit an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit on parcels that use both the authority contained within this section and the authority contained in Section 66411.7. (g) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), an application shall not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance. (h) Local agencies shall include units constructed pursuant to this section in the annual housing element report as required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400.
(i) For purposes of this section, all of the following apply:
(1) A housing development contains two residential units if the development proposes no more than two new units or if it proposes to add one new unit to one existing unit.
(2) The terms "objective zoning standards," "objective subdivision standards," and "objective design review standards" mean standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. These standards may be embodied in alternative objective land use specifications adopted by a local agency, and may include, but are not limited to, housing overlay zones, specific plans, inclusionary zoning ordinances, and density bonus ordinances. (3) "Local agency" means a city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered.
0) A local agency may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of this section. An ordinance adopted to implement this section shall not be considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(k) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the local agency shall not be required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for a housing development pursuant to this section.

SEC. 2. Section 66411.7 is added to the Government Code, to read:
66411.7. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this division and any local law, a local agency shall ministerially approve, as set forth in this section, a parcel map for an urban lot split only if the local agency determines that the parcel map for the urban lot split meets all the following requirements:
94 Ch. 162 — 6
(1) The parcel map subdivides an existing parcel to create no more than two new parcels of approximately equal lot area provided that one parcel shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision.
(2) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), both newly created parcels are no smaller than 1,200 square feet.
(B) A local agency may by ordinance adopt a smaller minimum lot size subject to ministerial approval under this subdivision. (3) The parcel being subdivided meets all the following requirements:
(A) The parcel is located within a single-family residential zone. (B) The parcel subject to the proposed urban lot split is located within a city, the boundaries of which include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau.
(C) The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4. (D) The proposed urban lot split would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(i) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
(ii) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity's valid exercise of its police power.
(iii) A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner's rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
(iv) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. (E) The parcel is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.
(F) The parcel has not been established through prior exercise of an urban lot split as provided for in this section.
(G) Neither the owner of the parcel being subdivided nor any person acting in concert with the owner has previously subdivided an adjacent parcel using an urban lot split as provided for in this section. (b) An application for a parcel map for an urban lot split shall be approved in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) A local agency shall approve or deny an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split ministerially without discretionary review. (2) A local agency shall approve an urban lot split only if it conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Division 94 7 — Ch. 162
2 (commencing with Section 66410)), except as otherwise expressly provided in this section.
(3) Notwithstanding Section 66411.1, a local agency shall not impose regulations that require dedications of rights -of -way or the construction of offsite improvements for the parcels being created as a condition of issuing a parcel map for an urban lot split pursuant to this section. (c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), notwithstanding any local law, a local agency may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards applicable to a parcel created by an urban lot split that do not conflict with this section. (2) A local agency shall not impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet.
(3) (A) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), in all other circumstances not described in subparagraph (A), a local agency may require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines.
(d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a local agency may deny an urban lot split if the building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. (e) In addition to any conditions established in accordance with this section, a local agency may require any of the following conditions when considering an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split:
(1) Easements required for the provision of public services and facilities. (2) A requirement that the parcels have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way.
(3) Off-street parking of up to one space per unit, except that a local agency shall not impose parking requirements in either of the following instances:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high -quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel. (f) A local agency shall require that the uses allowed on a lot created by this section be limited to residential uses.
(g) (1) A local agency shall require an applicant for an urban lot split to sign an affidavit stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the 94 Ch. 162 — 8
housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split.
(2) This subdivision shall not apply to an applicant that is a "community land trust," as defined in clause (ii) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or is a "qualified nonprofit corporation" as described in Section 214.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(3) A local agency shall not impose additional owner occupancy standards, other than provided for in this subdivision, on an urban lot split pursuant to this section.
(h) A local agency shall require that a rental of any unit created pursuant to this section be for a term longer than 30 days.
(i) A local agency shall not require, as a condition for ministerial approval of a parcel map application for the creation of an urban lot split, the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions.
0) (1) Notwithstanding any provision of Section 65852.2, 65852.21, 65852.22, 65915, or this section, a local agency shall not be required to permit more than two units on a parcel created through the exercise of the authority contained within this section.
(2) For the purposes of this section, "unit" means any dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, a unit or units created pursuant to Section 65852.21, a primary dwelling, an accessory dwelling unit as defined in Section 65852.2, or a junior accessory dwelling unit as defined in Section 65852.22.
(k) Notwithstanding paragraph (3) of subdivision (c), an application shall not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
(0 Local agencies shall include the number of applications for parcel maps for urban lot splits pursuant to this section in the annual housing element report as required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400.
(m) For purposes of this section, both of the following shall apply:
(1) "Objective zoning standards," "objective subdivision standards," and "objective design review standards" mean standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. These standards may be embodied in alternative objective land use specifications adopted by a local agency, and may include, but are not limited to, housing overlay zones, specific plans, inclusionary zoning ordinances, and density bonus ordinances.
(2) "Local agency" means a city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered.
(n) A local agency may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of this section. An ordinance adopted to implement this section shall not be 94 9 — Ch. 162
considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(o) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the local agency shall not be required to hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for urban lot splits pursuant to this section.

SEC. 3. Section 66452.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:
66452.6. (a) (1) An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after its approval or conditional approval, or after any additional period of time as may be prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed an additional 24 months. However, if the subdivider is required to expend two hundred thirty-six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($236,790) or more to construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, excluding improvements of public rights -of -way that abut the boundary of the property to be subdivided and that are reasonably related to the development of that property, each filing of a final map authorized by Section 66456.1 shall extend the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by 48 months from the date of its expiration, as provided in this section, or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map more than 10 years from its approval or conditional approval. However, a tentative map on property subject to a development agreement authorized by Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 65864) of Chapter 4 of Division 1 may be extended for the period of time provided for in the agreement, but not beyond the duration of the agreement. The number of phased final maps that may be filed shall be determined by the advisory agency at the time of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map. (2) Commencing January 1, 2012, and each calendar year thereafter, the amount of two hundred thirty-six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($236,790) shall be annually increased by operation of law according to the adjustment for inflation set forth in the statewide cost index for class B construction, as determined by the State Allocation Board at its January meeting. The effective date of each annual adjustment shall be March 1.

The adjusted amount shall apply to tentative and vesting tentative maps whose applications were received after the effective date of the adjustment. (3) "Public improvements," as used in this subdivision, include traffic controls, streets, roads, highways, freeways, bridges, overcrossings, street interchanges, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, and lighting facilities.
(b) (1) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any extension thereof granted pursuant to subdivision (e), shall not include any period of time during which a development moratorium, imposed after approval of the tentative map, is in existence. However, the length of the moratorium shall not exceed five years.
94 Ch. 162 —10 —
(2) The length of time specified in paragraph (1) shall be extended for up to three years, but in no event beyond January 1, 1992, during the pendency of any lawsuit in which the subdivider asserts, and the local agency that approved or conditionally approved the tentative map denies, the existence or application of a development moratorium to the tentative map. (3) Once a development moratorium is terminated, the map shall be valid for the same period of time as was left to run on the map at the time that the moratorium was imposed. However, if the remaining time is less than 120 days, the map shall be valid for 120 days following the termination of the moratorium.
(c) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any extension thereof granted pursuant to subdivision (e), shall not include the period of time during which a lawsuit involving the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map is or was pending in a court of competent jurisdiction, if the stay of the time period is approved by the local agency pursuant to this section. After service of the initial petition or complaint in the lawsuit upon the local agency, the subdivider may apply to the local agency for a stay pursuant to the local agency's adopted procedures. Within 40 days after receiving the application, the local agency shall either stay the time period for up to five years or deny the requested stay. The local agency may, by ordinance, establish procedures for reviewing the requests, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirements, appeal procedures, and other administrative requirements.
(d) The expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall terminate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map of all or any portion of the real property included within the tentative map shall be filed with the legislative body without first processing a new tentative map. Once a timely filing is made, subsequent actions of the local agency, including, but not limited to, processing, approving, and recording, may lawfully occur after the date of expiration of the tentative map. Delivery to the county surveyor or city engineer shall be deemed a timely filing for purposes of this section.
(e) Upon application of the subdivider filed before the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, the time at which the map expires pursuant to subdivision (a) may be extended by the legislative body or by an advisory agency authorized to approve or conditionally approve tentative maps for a period or periods not exceeding a total of six years. The period of extension specified in this subdivision shall be in addition to the period of time provided by subdivision (a). Before the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map, upon an application by the subdivider to extend that map, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs first. If the advisory agency denies a subdivider's application for an extension, the subdivider may appeal to the legislative body within 15 days after the advisory agency has denied the extension.
94 -11— Ch. 162
(f) For purposes of this section, a development moratorium includes a water or sewer moratorium, or a water and sewer moratorium, as well as other actions of public agencies that regulate land use, development, or the provision of services to the land, including the public agency with the authority to approve or conditionally approve the tentative map, which thereafter prevents, prohibits, or delays the approval of a final or parcel map. A development moratorium shall also be deemed to exist for purposes of this section for any period of time during which a condition imposed by the city or county could not be satisfied because of either of the following:
(1) The condition was one that, by its nature, necessitated action by the city or county, and the city or county either did not take the necessary action or by its own action or inaction was prevented or delayed in taking the necessary action before expiration of the tentative map. (2) The condition necessitates acquisition of real property or any interest in real property from a public agency, other than the city or county that approved or conditionally approved the tentative map, and that other public agency fails or refuses to convey the property interest necessary to satisfy the condition. However, nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to require any public agency to convey any interest in real property owned by it. A development moratorium specified in this paragraph shall be deemed to have been imposed either on the date of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map, if evidence was included in the public record that the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein may refuse to convey that property or interest, or on the date that the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein receives an offer by the subdivider to purchase that property or interest for fair market value, whichever is later. A development moratorium specified in this paragraph shall extend the tentative map up to the maximum period as set forth in subdivision (b), but not later than January 1, 1992, so long as the public agency that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein fails or refuses to convey the necessary property interest, regardless of the reason for the failure or refusal, except that the development moratorium shall be deemed to terminate 60 days after the public agency has officially made, and communicated to the subdivider, a written offer or commitment binding on the agency to convey the necessary property interest for a fair market value, paid in a reasonable time and manner.

SEC. 4. The Legislature finds and declares that ensuring access to affordable housing is a matter of statewide concern and not a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, Sections 1 and 2 of this act adding Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to the Government Code and Section 3 of this act amending Section 66452.6 of the Government Code apply to all cities, including charter cities.

SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act or 94 Ch. 162 —12 —
because costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.

U
94 Item No. 19

CITY OF TEMECULA / TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

AGENDA REPORT
TO:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

City Manager/Board of Directors
Aaron Adams, City Manager/Executive Director
February 22, 2022
Approve Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid -Year Budget Adjustments PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council/TCSD Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-
22 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

TEMECULA AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2022-26 AND AMENDING THE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
2021-22
BACKGROUND: In accordance with Budget Policy II.B.- Interim Reporting, City staff conducted a comprehensive Mid -Year review of its Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Budget. The purpose of the review is to analyze revenue and expenditure trends to identify variances from the Adopted Budget and ensure that the City maintains a healthy fiscal position. The Mid -Year Budget includes a review of all City funds. The requested adjustments are summarized in the attached exhibits and discussed in further detail below.

MID -YEAR HIGHLIGHTS:

The City closed the prior fiscal year with a larger than anticipated surplus in all major funds, as the economy rebounded much quicker from the pandemic than expected. Additionally, departments operated conservatively given the unknowns about the pandemic and underspent their budgets. As such, this Mid -Year Budget update includes a significant number of new requests to program the surplus funds and restore operating budgets. The attached Mid -Year Budget Update includes the following major requests, which are detailed further, by Fund, in the sections below.
➢ 10 new Authorized Full -Time positions
➢ 5 new Law Enforcement Contract positions (3 in FY21-22, 2 in FY22-23) ➢ 6% salary schedule adjustment, retroactive to July 1, 2021 ➢ 5 new Capital Improvement Projects
➢ Additional funding for 7 existing Capital Improvement Projects

GENERAL
General Fund Revenue includes an increase of $8,589,404, bringing total FY21-22 Revenue to $102,987,456. Major adjustments by revenue category are noted below:
• Property Tax — increase of $241,664 to reflect increased assessed valuations • Sales Tax — increase of $6,089,258 to reflect current trend in sales tax receipts, which is an 8% growth rate over the prior year.
• Franchise Fees — increase of $100,000 to reflect current growth trend. • Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) — increase of $500,000 to reflect current growth trend in hotel occupancy rates.
• Land Development — increase of $816,000 due to heavy permit/building activity. • Other Reimbursements — increase of $218,132 to reflect the collection of the newly implemented Community Facility Districts for Public Services in the Sommer's Bend and Rancho Soleo neighborhoods.

General Fund Expenditures include an increase of $8,756,303, bringing total Expenditues and Transfers Out to $98,253,723. Major adjustments by expenditure category are noted below:
• Salaries and Benefits — increase of $1,402,789 to reflect the 6% retroactive pay increase to July 1, 2021 ($868,886 - previously approved by the Council at their December 14, 2021 meeting), the addition of new positions ($411,631), the re -allocation of existing staff due to new job assignments ($129,004) and miscellaneous departmental adjustments (-$6,732).
• Operations and Maintenance — reduction of $140,345 to reflect the reduction in City Attorney costs (-$300,000) due to a lower than anticipated trend, offset by various increases across several departments.
• Internal Service Fund Allocations — increase of $120,399 to reflect the salaries and benefits changes combined with miscellaneous operational adjustments within the Internal Service Funds.
• Capital Outlay — increase of $79,981 for the costs associated with office modifications, equipment and furniture related to the City Attorney and Human Resources relocations. • Transfers Out — increase of $7,293,478 for a prior year roll-over for the Sidewalks-DLR Drive capital project ($253,478) and the establishment of the COVID-19 Pandemic Community Reinvestment Program Fund 110 ($7,040,000).

General Fund Ending Fund Balance is projected to be $49,977,764, with Reserves fully - funded at $21,057,250.

Due to the favorable
trend in revenue, as the
economy has recovered
60,000,000
55,000,000
from the pandemic, the
General Fund Balance
50,000,000
45,000,000
40,000,000
has returned to healthy
35,000,000
levels throughout the
Z°;o00:00o
five-year forecast with
20,000,000
reserves fully -funded
y
each year.
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
General Fund 5-Year Projections
Fund Balance Trend
Fy16.11 FV111a oil,-19 019-20 OV-11 021-11 OV-11 FY23-24 FV201 FV25-26 Fund Balance —Funded Reserve O Desired Reserve
MEASURE S FUND: A
Measure S Revenue includes an increase of $5,532,539, bringing total FY21-22 Revenue to $36,232,539. Measure S revenue has rebounded significantly from the pandemic and the adjustment reflects an 8% growth rate over the prior year's revenue.

Measure S Expenditures includes an increase of 5,085,000, bringing total FY21-22 Expenditures to $51,684,679. Mid -Year adjustments reflect increased funding for several existing and new Capital Improvement Projects, and noted below:
• Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland — $1,000,000
• Citywide Surveillance Cameras - $600,000 for Harveston Park • Bike Lane & Trail Program-Infill Mini Pump Track - $100,000 • Sports Field LED Lighting - $200,000
• Fiber Optic Communication Systems (new) - $1,200,000
• Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink (new) - $750,000 • Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure (new) - $75,000 • Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park (new) - $1,000,000 In addition, an increase in the transfer to the
City Facilities Rehabilitation Fund ($160,000) is
included to address various roof repairs needed
at several Fire Stations.

With a favorable year-end surplus from FY20-
21, one-time funds were available to program
additional projects, bringing the appropriation
for Capital Projects up to 53% of total
appropriations.

Total Measure S Ending Fund Balance is
estimated to be $9,763,463.

Measure S - FY21-22 Appropriations
$51,684,679

SPECIAL REVENUE & DEBT SERVICE FUNDS:

The City maintains 16 separate Special Revenue Funds and two Debt Service Funds. Activities in these funds are legally required to be accounted for in separate and distinct funds. Below is a summary of the Mid -Year requests for each Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds.

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
100: GAS TAX
102: ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACCOUNT
103: STREET MAINTENANCE
106: UPTOWN TEMECULA NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEES
107: CARES ACT
108: ARPA
120: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
125: PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT (PEG)
140: COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
145: TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET (TEAM)
150: AB 2766 MOTOR VEHICLE SUBVENTION
160: SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
161: TEMECULA MAIOR CRIMES REWARD
165: AFFORDABLE HOUSING
170: MEASURE A
198: PUBLIC ART

TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
395: 2018 FINANCING LEASE (CIVIC CENTER)
396: 2018 FINANCING LEASE (MRC)

TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
BeginningaRevenues/ Mid -Year Revenues/ ExpendRures/ Mid -Year ExpendRures/ Ending Balance r Transfers In Adjustment Transfers In Transfers Out Adjustment Transfers Out Balance 2021-22 2021-22
2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22
101,877
2,905,183
40,612
2,945,795
3,007,060
40,612
3,047,672
-
1,585,330
2,238,944
111,075
2,350,019
2,496,250
-
2,496,250
1,439,099
3,461,494
2,010,800
-
2,010,800
-
-
-
5,472,294
895,391
695,480
-
695,480
-
-
-
1,590,871
-
7,039,754
7,039,754
7,039,754
-
7,039,754
-
3,564,979
12,046,562
(5,941,949)
6,104,613
5,852,505
-
5,852,505
3,817,087
623,661
223,507
-
223,507
265,000
-
265,000
582,168
(282,957)
564,354
2,553,332
3,117,686
1,424,015
1,092,041
2,516,056
318,673
839,738
1,500
-
1,500
300,000
-
300,000
541,238
172,301
147,230
-
147,230
110,404
-
110,404
209,127
86,621
279,850
-
279,850
279,850
-
279,850
86,621
27,207
200
-
200
27,504
(97)
27,407
-
12,054,618
264,000
-
264,000
505,446
61,673
567,119
11,751,499
9,430,636
3,248,500
972,720
4,221,220
3,236,010
1,500,000
4,736,010
8,915,846
91,099
64,688
-
64,688
-
-
-
155,787
32,651,995
31,730,552
(2,264,210)
29,466,342
24,543,798
2,694,229
27,238,027
34,880,310
-
1,962,107
-
1,962,107
1,962,107
-
1,962,107
-
-
555,808
-
555,808
555,808
-
555,808
-
-
2,517,915
-
2,517,915
2,517,915
-
2,517,915
-
Gas Tax reflects the addition of $40,612 in revenue, per the estimates received from the State.

These funds are transferred to the General Fund to support street and road maintenance.

Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) reflects the addition of $111,075 in revenue, per the estimates received from the State.

Development Impact Fee revenue reflects a reduction of $5,941,949 due to delays in development projects originally thought to have been constructed in FY21-22.

Community Development Block Grant reflects revenue and expenditure roll-overs from prior fiscal years, due to delays in drawing down CDBG funds and deferred spending in Capital Projects.

Measure A reflects an increase of $972,720 in revenue due to the improved economy and a transfer of $1M to the CIP to support the Diaz Road Expansion project and $500,000 increase for road maintenance.

INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS:

The City has nine Internal Service Funds, used to account for services provided internally between departments. Below is a summary of the Mid -Year requests for each Internal Service Fund.

Beginning
Balance
2021-22
urrent
venues/
Revenues/
Transfers In
2021-22
Mid -Year
Adjustment
Revised
Revenues/
Transfers In
2021-22
Current
Expenditures/
Transfers Out
2021-22
Mid -Year
Adjustment
Revised
Expenditures/
Transfers Out
2021-22
Ending
Balance
2021-22

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
300: INSURANCE
828,918
1,208,210
(26,000)
1,182,210
1,323,275
(26,000)
1,297,275
713,853
305: WORKERS'COMPENSATION
2,038,333
16,700
-
16,700
359,411
10,841
370,252
1,684,781
310: VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
4,273,712
944,065
-
944,065
825,593
-
825,593
4,392,184
320: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1,305,662
5,030,716
163,520
5,194,236
5,228,855
163,520
5,392,375
1,107,523
325: TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT
2,060,546
680,401
-
680,401
213,913
-
213,913
2,527,034
330: SUPPORT SERVICES
4,024
379,260
10,453
389,713
379,155
10,453
389,608
4,129
335: SUPPORT SERVICES REPLACEMENT
389,783
37,024
37,024
40,000
40,000
386,807
340: FACILITIES
588,587
1,421,769
22,129
1,443,898
1,422,206
22,129
1,444,335
588,150
350: FACILITY REPLACEMENT
382,769
579,409
160,000
739,409
968,614
150,500
1,119,114
3,064
10,761,021
331,443
11,092,464
11,407,526
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 11,872,334 10,297,554 330,102 10,627,656 The majority of the Mid -Year requests reflect the costs associated with the 6% salary schedule adjustment.

TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) provides for a comprehensive neighborhood and community park system, as well as a complement of recreational and cultural programs, community and human services and special events. TCSD also provides street lighting, median and slope maintenance, refuse hauling and recycling, emergency dirt road maintenance, and library services.

TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD)
190: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREETLIGHT REPLACEMENT
192: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS
194: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING
195: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAWT
196: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
197: TEMECULA LIBRARY
501-530: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONES 1-30

TOTALTCSD
Current RevLSed Current Revised
Beginning Revenues/ Mid -Year Revenues/ Expenditures/ Mid -Year Expenditures/ BalEn ance Balance Transfers In Adjustment Transfers In Transfers Out Adjustment Transfers Out Balance 2021-22 ---. -- ---. -- „-„. -- 2021-22
1,238,945
13,168,030
609,131 13,777,161
13,584,588
976,065
14,560,653
455,453
-
400,000
- 400,000
-
-
-
400,000
761,638
642,145
- 642,145
888,369
-
888,369
515,414
186,788
8,676,354
- 8,676,354
8,784,494
33,267
8,817,761
45,381
30,688
-
- -
-
10,000
10,000
20,688
409,961
256,047
- 256,047
313,302
1,396
314,698
351,310
531,981
970,188
10,500 980,688
1,111,691
(17,514)
1,094,177
418,492
1,782,546
1,597,633
- 1,597,633
1,970,109
24,569
1,994,678
1,385,501
4,942,547 25,710,397 619,631 26,330,028 26,652,553 1,027,783 27,680,336 3,592,239 The TCSD Operations Fund Mid -Year Adjustments reflect the addition of $609,131 in revenue to reflect the return of contract classes, theater and musuem admissions and sports leagues and tournaments. The expenditure adjustment of $976,065 reflects the higher level of contract classes, personnel costs associated with the salary adjustment, a new Project employee conversion to full-time/authorized status and the addition of 12 Project positions to support Day Camp operations and the newly opened Sommer's Bend Sports Ranch.

Adjustments in the Service Levels Funds reflect the salary schedule adjustment and minor changes in the operational costs for each service level.

The Library Fund reflects a net reduction in expenditures of $17,514 due to the reduction in security costs, as the County is providing coverage for these costs.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Adjustments to the Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program include the following:
• Diaz Road Expansion - $1,000,000 (Measure A)
• Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland — $1,000,000 (Measure S) • City Facilities Rehabilitation - $100,000 (Facilities Replacement Fund) • Citywide Surveillance Cameras - $600,000 (Measure S) for Harveston Park • Bike Lane & Trail Program -Great Oak Trail Lighting — ($100,000) (Service Level C-Zone 28) reduced to fit within available funding
• Bike Lane & Trail Program-Infill Mini Pump Track - $100,000 (Measure S) • Sports Field LED Lighting - $200,000 (Measure S)
The following new projects are recommended to be added to the CIP:
• Fiber Optic Communication Systems - $1,200,000 (Measure S) • Murrieta Creek Regional Sports Park - $1,000,000 (DIF-Quimby) • Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink - $750,000 (Measure S) • Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park - $1,000,000 (Measure S) • Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure - $75,000 (Measure S) Additionally, the Project Description for the Old Town Parking Structure project has been expanded to include the other parking improvements recently installed to support additional parking spaces in Old Town.

The Schedule of Authorized Positions reflects the recommended addition of 10 new full-time positions, bringing the Total Authorized Positions to 190.95, including 3 unfunded positions (two of which are awaiting the re -opening of the renovated Margarita Recreation Center).

The new positions are summarized below by Department:

Community Development Department (FY21-22 cost = $277,241) (2) Code Enforcement Officer I positions
(1) Community Development Technician I position
(1) Building Inspector II position
(1) Planning Technician position
(1) Assistant Director of Community Development position Public Works Department (FY21-22 cost = $116,539)
(1) Associate Civil Engineer position
(1) Supervising Public Works Inpsector position
Temecula Community Services Department (FY21-22 cost = $11,400) (1) Senior Recreation Leader position (conversion of a Project position) Human Resources/Risk Management Department (FY21-22 cost = $0, due to offsetting savings) (1) Management Assistant position — Limited Term Assignment

In addition to the 10 Authorized Positions, it is recommended to amend the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services Between the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside to add five new dedicated positions. It is proposed to add three positions at Mid -Year ($556,995, offset by other operational savings) and two positions in the FY22-23 Annual Operating Budget ($779,793). A contract amendment will be brought forward for Council consideration at a subsequent meeting.

City of Temecula
History of Authorized Positions
250.00
210.75
200.00 19Q.95
150.00
100.00

50.00 �yyg0 0 g�l �O� y.61; 04 dADe5,
O�� ezti�Dti�a4ti0T
S��e e�R�A�T �ti� ��y�y�oy4,�00�
As noted above, the City's Authorized Positions of 190.95 remain 19.8 positions below the City's peak employment level of 210.75 in Fiscal Year 2007-08.

FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal impact of each fund is noted in the attached Exhibits.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Mid -Year Budget Amendments
a. Exhibit A — General & Measure S Fund
b. Exhibit B — Special Revenue & Debt Service Funds
c. Exhibit C — Internal Service Funds
d. Exhibit D — Schedule of Authorized Positions

2. CSD Resolution Mid -Year Budget Amendments
a. Exhibit A — TCSD Funds

3. Resolution - Capital Improvement Program
Mid -Year Budget Amendments
a. Exhibit 1 — CIP Mid -Year Adjustments

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position.

Section 2. That each year a mid -year review is conducted of City operating budgets.

Section 3. That the mid -year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the attached schedules for the City's General Fund, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Internal Services Funds.

Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2021-22 General Fund and Measure S Fund Annual Operating Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit A, General Fund Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid -Year Budget.

Section 5. That the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Special Revenue Funds Annual Operating Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit B — Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid -Year Budget.

Section 6. That the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Internal Services Funds Annual Operating Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit C, Internal Services Funds Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid -Year Budget.

Section 7. That the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Schedule of Authorized Positions is hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit D, Schedule of Authorized Positions.

Section 8. That Fund 110: COVID-19 Pandemic Community Reinvestment Program be established to account for various community grants established by the City Council in support of this program.

Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of February, 2022.

Matt Rahn, Mayor
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22"d day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk

EXH I BIT A
General
Fund
&
Measure
S
Fund

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 001 - GENERAL FUND
% Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Property Tax
9,413,841
9,619,754
3,615,292
9,861,418
241,664

2.5 %
Sales Tax
42,573,718
39,890,358
19,173,067
45,979,616
6,089,258

15.3 %
Sales Tax Sharing Agreement
(1,216,873)
(1,330,198)
(334,564)
(1,277,716)
52,482
-3.9 %
Franchise Fees
3,724,781
3,638,356
1,049,614
3,738,356
100,000

2.7 %
Transient Occupancy Tax
3,022,209
3,246,636
1,781,662
3,746,636
500,000

15.4 %
Special Tax (Measure C)
1,892,962
1,872,624
1,009,996
1,872,624
0 0.0 %
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Development Impact Fees
22,708
18,000
0 18,000
0 0.0 %
Charges For Services
0 0
371
0 0

0.0 %
Business Licenses
256,845
260,100
114,745
260,100
0 0.0 %
Land Development
2,292,104
371,090
911,838
1,187,090
816,000
219.9 %
Public Works
4,750
4,845
0 4,845
0 0.0 %
Parks Maintenance
0 1,020
0 1,020
0 0.0 %
Building
2,317,035
2,344,552
1,328,043
2,539,552
195,000

8.3 %
Planning
631,350
714,106
361,494
802,486
88,380

12.4 %
Police
45,227
46,000
29,208
47,000
1,000

2.2 %
Fire
953,382
750,652
569,653
837,002
86,350

11.5 %
Development Fees
164,698
285,495
205,122
211,470
(74,025)
-25.9 %
Fines and Forfeitures
Fines & Forfeitures
539,794
381,132
228,275
503,343
122,211

32.1 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
(320,090)
122,500
(54,394)
72,500
(50,000)
-40.8 %
Lease/Rental Income
140,303
213,625
100,741
213,625
0 0.0 %
Other
79,231
76,967
25,223
79,967
3,000

3.9 %
Intergovernmental Revenues
Property Tax In Lieu Of VLF
8,798,060
9,091,916
0 9,194,656
102,740

1.1 %
Vehicle License Fees
82,123
74,732
0 86,229
11,497

15.4 %
Grants
3,500
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Reimbursements
Capital Improvement Program
2,196,284
2,290,748
632,412
2,290,748
0 0.0 %
Pechanga IGA
688,803
352,363
0 352,363
0 0.0 %
Other Reimbursements
302,830
240,154
151,422
458,286
218,132

90.8 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
4,264,863
10,544,495
7,039,754
10,585,010
40,515

0.4 %
Contribution From Measure S
5,944,780
9,266,670
2,316,668
9,266,670
0 0.0 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
55,022
9,360
44,028
54,560
45,200
482.9 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
88,874,241
94,398,052
40,299,670
102,987,456
8,589,404

9.1 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
16,023,688
17,370,238
9,601,772
18,773,028
1,402,789

8.1 %
Operations & Maintenance
50,122,286
58,388,437
24,163,866
58,248,092
(140,345)
-0.2 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
5,152,670
6,089,669
1,791,180
6,210,068
120,399

2.0 %
Capital Outlay
131,441
917,829
341,921
997,811
79,981

8.7 %

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 001 - GENERAL FUND
Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Transfers
4,733,575
6,731,246
3,818,380
14,024,724
7,293,478
108.4
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
76,163,660
89,497,420
39,717,120
98,253,723
8,756,303

9.8 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
12,710,581
4,900,632
582,550
4,733,733
(166,899)
-3.4
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
32,533,450
45,244,031
45,244,031
Fund Balance, End of Year
45,244,031
50,144,662
49,977,764
Fund Description
The General Fund is the main operating fund for the City of Temecula. It is used to account for all financial resources for the City that are not restricted to a special purpose and otherwise required to be accounted for in another fund. The General fund provides the resources necessary to sustain the day-to-day activities and pays for all administrative and operating expenditures.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 002 - MEASURE S FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21 Current Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Transactions And Use Tax 33,484,758 30,581,000 15,410,631 36,163,539
5,582,539

18.3 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 40,650 119,000 7,233
69,000
(50,000)
-42.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 33,525,409 30,700,000 15,417,865 36,232,539
5,532,539

18.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers 23,755,497 46,599,679 8,154,363
51,684,679
5,085,000

10.9 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 23,755,497 46,599,679 8,154,363
51,684,679
5,085,000

10.9 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 9,769,912 (15,899,679) 7,263,502 (15,452,140)
447,539
-2.8 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 15,445,691 25,215,603
25,215,603
Fund Balance, End of Year 25,215,603 9,315,924
9,763,463
Fund Description
Measure 5, approved by the voters on November 8, 2016, established a one -cent Transactions and Use Tax for the City.

The
measure was approved based on the commitment to maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, prevent cuts to local
paramedic/police/fire protection, school safety patrols, youth/after-school, senior and disabled services; improve freeway interchanges/reduce traffic and provide for other general services.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 110 - COVID-19 PANDEMIC COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PROGRAM Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
0 0
0 7,040,000
7,040,000
100.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
0 0
0 7,040,000
7,040,000
100.0
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
0 0
0 20,395
20,395
100.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
0 0
0 20,395
20,395
100.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
0 0
0 7,019,605
7,019,605
100.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
0 0
Fund Balance, End of Year
0 0
7,019,605
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for various community grants established by the City Council in support of this program

EXHIBIT B
Special Revenue Funds

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
FUND: 100 -GAS TAX FUND
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Gas Tax
2,511,401
2,905,183
1,128,225 2,945,795 40,612 1.4
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
1,768
0 278 0 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
2,513,170
2,905,183
1,128,503 2,945,795 40,612 1.4 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
2,513,170
3,007,060
0 3,047,672 40,612 1.4
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
2,513,170
3,007,060
0 3,047,672 40,612 1.4 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
0 (101,877)
1,128,503 (101,877) 0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
101,877
101,877
101,877
Fund Balance, End of Year
101,877
0 0
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for the tax per gallon on the purchase of motor vehicle fuel imposed by the State of California.

A portion is allocated to the City of Temecula as specified in the California Streets and Highways Code (SHC) (Sections 2013, 2105, 2107 and 2107.5). Gas Tax monies are restricted
to the repair, maintenance and
upkeep of City streets and roads, and the purchase
of equipment used to maintain roads.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 102 - ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) FUND Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Gas Tax
2,058,949
2,224,694
1,132,022
2,335,769
111,075

5.0 Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
4,692
14,250
567
14,250
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
2,063,640
2,238,944
1,132,589
2,350,019
111,075

5.0 Expenditures by Category
Transfers
1,802,742
2,496,250
0 2,496,250
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
1,802,742
2,496,250
0 2,496,250
0 0.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
260,898
(257,306)
1,132,589
(146,231)
111,075
-43.2
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
1,324,432
1,585,330
1,585,330
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,585,330
1,328,024
1,439,099
Fund Description
This fund is to account for gasoline and vehicle registration taxes pursuant to the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (S61 Beall). Monies are collected by the State of California and allocated to local agencies for streets and roads projects and other transportation uses.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 120 - DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Development Impact Fees
2,046,369
9,724,117
1,009,807
3,782,168
(5,941,949)
-61.1 %
Quimby Fees
34,441
2,300,445
9,254
2,300,445
0 0.0 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
7,648
22,000
1,071
22,000
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
2,088,459
12,046,562
1,020,132
6,104,613
(5,941,949)
-49.3 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
1,115,835
5,852,505
146,423
5,852,505
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
1,115,835
5,852,505
146,423
5,852,505
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
972,624
6,194,057
873,709
252,108
(5,941,949)
-95.9 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
2,592,355
3,564,979
3,564,979
Fund Balance, End of Year
3,564,979
9,759,036
3,817,087
Fund Description
This fund accounts for the development impact fees received as a result of development activity within the City. The fees are primarily used to fund Capital Improvement Projects designed to mitigate the impacts of development projects.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 140 - COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND
% Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Intergovernmental Revenues
Community Development Block Grant
63,909
564,354
676,901
1,951,752
1,387,398
245.8 %

CDBG - CV GRANTS
0 0
0 329,000
329,000
100.0 %
CDBG - CV2 GRANTS
0 0
0 836,934
836,934
100.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
412,056
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
475,965
564,354
676,901
3,117,686
2,553,332
452.4 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
106,706
33,400
19,160
35,039
1,639

4.9 %
Operations & Maintenance
464,058
1,066,710
226,036
1,066,710
0 0.0 %
Transfers
124,248
323,906
0 1,414,308
1,090,402
336.6 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
695,013
1,424,015
245,196
2,516,056
1,092,041

76.7 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(219,048)
(859,661)
431,705
601,630
1,461,291
-170.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
(63,909)
(282,957)
(282,957)
Fund Balance, End of Year
(282,957)
(1,142,618)
318,673
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for grants received from the U.S. Department
of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD). The
grants are used for the redevelopment of a viable
community by providing decent housing,
a suitable living
environment, and for
expanding opportunities, principally for persons
of low and moderate income.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 161 - TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND
Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 83 200 8 200 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 83 200 8 200 0 0.0
Expenditures by Category
Transfers 0 27,504 0 27,407 (97) -0.4
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 0 27,504 0 27,407 (97) -0.4
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 83 (27,304) 8 (27,207) 97 -0.4 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 27,124 27,207 27,207
Fund Balance, End of Year 27,207 (97) 0
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for a reward for information that leads to the capture and conviction of the person(s) responsible for the murder of Larry Robinson and Justin Triplett. The General Fund contributed $25,000 and the public can also contribute to this fund. The fund was established in accordance with Resolution Nos. 13-25 and 15-37. In April of 2018, Council adopted Resolution No. 18-24 for the continuation of the reward for an additional three years (to March 22, 2021) to assist the Sheriff in the investigation since no person has been arrested for the Larry Robinson murder.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 165 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND
% Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
5,883
14,000
622
14,000
0 0.0 %
Lease/Rental Income
84,019
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Other
3,000
0 0
0 0

0.0 Intergovernmental Revenues
Agency Trust Contribution
250,000
250,000
0 250,000
0 0.0 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
38,869
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
381,771
264,000
622
264,000
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
225,918
213,616
127,727
244,801
31,184

14.6 %
Operations & Maintenance
23,379
259,185
26,905
289,185
30,000

11.6 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
35,267
32,644
11,631
33,133
489

1.5 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
284,564
505,446
166,263
567,119
61,673

12.2 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
97,207
(241,446)
(165,640)
(303,119)
(61,673)

25.5 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
11,957,411
12,054,618
12,054,618
Fund Balance, End of Year
12,054,618
11,813,173
11,751,500
Fund Description
The Affordable Housing fund contains the assets as well as loan and rental income which have been transferred to the City of Temecula from the former Redevelopment Agency.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 170 - MEASURE A FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget 12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
20,949
53,500 2,672
53,500
0 0.0 %
Intergovernmental Revenues
Measure A
3,969,257
3,195,000 1,059,869
4,167,720
972,720

30.4 Total Revenues and Other Sources
3,990,206
3,248,S00 1,062,S41
4,221,220
972,720

29.9 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
2,157,646
2,112,630 1,561,510
2,612,630
500,000

23.7 Transfers
143,600
1,123,380 0
2,123,380
1,000,000

89.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
2,301,246
3,236,010 1,561,510
4,736,010
1,500,000

46.4 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,688,960
12,490 (498,969)
(514,790)
(527,280)
-4,221.5 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
7,741,676
9,430,636
9,430,636
Fund Balance, End of Year
9,430,636
9,443,126
8,915,846
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for the City's
allocation of
the County of Riverside's additional
one-half
percent sales
tax for
transportation. These monies are restricted for use on local streets.

In 2002, Measure A was
extended by Riverside County voters.

Measure A will continue to fund transportation improvements through 2039.

EXHIBIT C
Internal Service Funds

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 300 - INSURANCE FUND
% Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
974,037
1,200,010
861,812
1,174,010
(26,000)
-2.2 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
3,433
8,200
213
8,200
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
977,470
1,208,210
862,025
1,182,210
(26,000)
-2.2 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
99,097
121,929
75,168
144,811
22,882

18.8 Operations & Maintenance
877,714
1,201,346
908,758
1,152,464
(48,882)
-4.1
Uncategorized Expenses
(80,169)
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
896,642
1,323,275
983,925
1,297,275
(26,000)
-2.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
80,828
(115,065)
(121,900)
(115,065)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
748,090
828,918
828,918
Fund Balance, End of Year
828,918
713,853
713,853
Fund Description
The Insurance Fund was established to account for the City's liability and property insurance costs. Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets. These costs are allocated to each department based on the total number
of Full Time
Equivalent positions assigned to those departments. The City has a Self -Insured Retention
(SIR) of $150,000
per incident, and
strives to maintain a fund balance equal to three times the SIR.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 305 - WORKERS' COMPENSATION FUND
Change
2021-22 Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21 Current Actuals
Revised Requested
Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021
Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 7,044 16,700 595
16,700 0

0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 7,044 16,700 595
16,700 0

0.0 Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits 81,428 104,105 58,094
109,355 5,250

5.0 Operations & Maintenance 263,807 255,306 188,053
260,897 5,591

2.2 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 345,235 359,411 246,147
370,252 10,841

3.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (338,192) (342,711) (245,552) (353,552) (10,841)

3.2 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 2,376,525 2,038,333 2,038,333
Fund Balance, End of Year 2,038,333 1,695,622
1,684,781
Fund Description
The Workers' Compensation Fund was established in Fiscal Year 2014-15 as the City transitions to a self -insured status for Workers' Compensation liabilities. Departments are charged based on each position allocated on a Full Time Equivalent basis, with
a cost
assigned to each position based on job duties and potential for risk. The desired Net Position for this fund is $1.5 million,
which
represents three -times the City's Self -Insured Retention amount of $500,000.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 320 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
% Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
4,035,562
4,723,616
1,030,097
4,887,136
163,520

3.5 Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
4,693
7,100
201
7,100
0 0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
172
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
260,000
300,000
75,000
300,000
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
4,300,427
5,030,716
1,105,298
5,194,236
163,520

3.3 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
2,135,012
2,078,421
1,198,812
2,184,941
106,520

5.1 %
Operations & Maintenance
1,967,566
3,107,774
1,878,632
3,164,774
57,000

1.8 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
2,660
2,660
665
2,660
0 0.0 %
Capital Outlay
0 40,000
107,997
40,000
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
4,105,238
5,228,855
3,186,106
5,392,375
163,520

3.1 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
195,189
(198,139)
(2,080,808)
(198,139)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
1,110,473
1,305,662
1,305,662
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,305,662
1,107,523
1,107,524
Fund Description
The Information Technology Fund was established to fund and account for computer and telephone system operating and maintenance expenses. Fund Balance is a combination
of both spendable and
non spendable
assets. Adjustments are made to
Fund Balance to include additional spendable resources available for expenditure. Departments are charged based on the number
of electronic devices assigned. The Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library facility is charged directly for all IT expenditures and personnel costs related to the facility.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 330 - SUPPORT SERVICES FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date
2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals
Revised Requested Current
Description
Actuals Budget 12-31-2021
Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
261,669 379,155 67,657
389,608 10,453 2.8
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
107 105 (1)
105 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
261,776 379,260 67,656
389,713 10,453 2.8 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
198,682 228,789 126,891
239,242 10,453 4.6
Operations & Maintenance
61,773 150,366 104,589
150,366 0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
260,455 379,155 231,479
389,608 10,453 2.8 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,320 105 (163,823)
105 0 0.2 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
2,704 4,024
4,024
Fund Balance, End of Year
4,024 4,129
4,130
Fund Description
The Support Services Fund was established as a cost
center for the City's central receptionist,
duplicating, printing, and mailing
activities. It is also used to depreciate all related
copying and mailing equipment over their
useful lives, and to accumulate
resources for the purchase of future equipment.

Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets.

Departments are charged based on a count of copies made in the previous fiscal year.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
FUND: 340 - FACILITIES FUND
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
1,285,406
1,420,809
357,912
1,442,938
22,129

1.6 Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
1,501
960
132
960
0 0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
29,284
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
1,316,191
1,421,769
358,044
1,443,898
22,129

1.6 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
373,638
386,772
226,616
408,751
21,979

5.7 %
Operations & Maintenance
939,660
1,035,434
676,822
1,035,584
150

0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
1,313,298
1,422,206
903,438
1,444,335
22,129

1.6 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,893
(437)
(545,394)
(437)
0 -0.1 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
585,694
588,587
588,587
Fund Balance, End of Year
588,587
588,150
588,151
Fund Description
The Facilities Fund was established to account for
the cost of the Civic Center, Former City
Hall Facility, City
Maintenance Facility,
Field Operations Center, and Civic Center Parking Structure operations and maintenance.

Fund Balance is a
combination of
both
spendable and non spendable assets. Departments are charged based on square footage allotted as well as full time staff
equivalents assigned.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 350 - FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND
% Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
37,228
76,009
14,762
76,009
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
687
3,400
7 3,400
0 0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
500,000
500,000
125,000
660,000
160,000

32.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
537,915
579,409
139,769
739,409
160,000

27.6 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
64,323
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Capital Outlay
0 338,920
213,134
389,420
50,500

14.9 %
Transfers
712,056
629,694
75,000
729,694
100,000

15.9 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
776,378
968,614
288,134
1,119,114
150,500

15.5 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(238,464)
(389,205)
(148,365)
(379,705)
9,500
-2.4 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
621,233
382,769
382,769
Fund Balance, End of Year
382,769
(6,436)
3,064
Fund Description
The Facility Replacement Fund was established to accumulate resources for the future replacement of equipment, systems and fixtures within City -owned facilities.

EXHIBIT D
Schedule of Authorized
Positions

City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Mid -Year Budget

SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
As of February 22, 2022
FY2021-22
Number of
Positions
Salary Schedule
Bargaining
Unit*
Exempt/Non-
Exempt
Monthly Salary
Minimum Maximum

CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember

5.0 600 800
N/A
E
City Council Subtotal:

5.0 CITY MANAGER
Assistant City Manager

1.0 13,622 19,248
Exec
E
Assistant to the City Manager
City Manager
Executive Assistant
Office Aide III

1.0 10,129 14,311
MCP
E

1.0 N/A 21,557
Contract
E

1.0 4,711 6,657
MCP
E

0.75 3,096 3,963
Rep
NE
City Manager Subtotal:

AAW

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Economic Development Manager
Management Analyst
Management Assistant (Confidential)
Multimedia Specialist 1
Economic Development Subtotal:

CITY CLERK
Deputy City Clerk
Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
Management Assistant
Records Manager
Records Technician
City Clerk Subtotal:

HUMAN RESOURCES
Director of HR/Risk Management
Human Resources Assistant (Confidential)

1.0 8,110 11,459
MCP
E

1.0 6,030 8,522
MCP
E

1.0 4,485 6,337
MCP
NE

1.0 4

1.0 4,829 6,183
6,824 9,640
Rep
MCP
NE
E

1.0 11,180 15,797
Exec
E

1.0 4,485 5,740
Rep
NE

1.0 6,183 8,735
MCP
E

1.0 5.0

1.0 3,592 4,597
11,180 15,797
Rep
Exec
NE
E

1.0 4,268 6,030
MCP
NE
Human Resources Technician I (Confidential)

1.0 4,711 6,657
MCP
NE
Management Assistant (Confidential) - Limited Term

1.0 4,485 6,337
MCP
NE
Risk Manager (Underfill as Mgmt Analyst)

1.0 8,110 11,459
MCP
E
Senior Management Analyst

2.0 6,657 9,405
MCP
E
Human Resources Subtotal:
7 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Management Analyst

1.0 6,030 8,522
MCP
E
Emergency Management Subtotal:

1.0 FINANCE
Accountant II (Confidential)
Accounting Assistant (Cashier & AP)
Accounting Technician 1
Assistant Director of Finance

1.0 6,495 9,176
MCP
NE

4.0 4,375 5,600
Rep
NE

1.0 4,829 6,183
Rep
NE

1.0 8,953 12,650
MCP
E
Director of Finance

1.0 12,040 17,012
Exec
E
Fiscal Services Manager

2.0 8,110 11,459
MCP
E
Management Analyst

1.0 6,030 8,522
MCP
E
Finance Manager

1.0 6,824 9,640
MCP
E
Senior Accountant

1.0 7,169 10,129
MCP
NE
Senior Accounting Technician (Confidential)

1.0 5,600 7,913
MCP
NE
Senior Accounting Technician - Payroll (Confidential)

1.0 5,600 7,913
MCP
NE
Finance Subtotal:

15.00 City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Mid -Year Budget

SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
As of February 22, 2022
FY2021-22
Number of
Positions
Salary Schedule
Bargaining
Unit*
Exempt/Non-
Exempt
Monthly Salary
Minimum Maximum

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Assistant Director Information Technology/Support Svcs

1.0 9,640 13,622
MCP
E
Director of Information Technology/Support Svcs

1.0 11,180 15,797
Exec
E
Information Technology Manager

1.0 8,735 12,341
MCP
E
Information Technology Specialist II

1.0 5,883 7,531
Rep
NE
Information Technology Supervisor

3.0 7,169 9,176
Rep
NE
Information Technology Supervisor (Multimedia Services)

1.0 7,169 9,176
Rep
NE
Information Technology Technician 1

1.0 4,829 6,183
Rep
NE
Information Technology Technician II

1.0 5,073 6,495
Rep
NE
Senior Administrative Assistant

0.5 4,485 6,030
Rep
NE
Senior Information Technology Specialist

2.0 6,495 8,314
Rep
NE
Support Services
Office Specialist II - AM
Office Specialist II - PM
Support Services Supervisor
Support Services Technician

0.6 3,504 4,485
Rep
NE

1.0 4,268 5,464
Rep
NE

0.5 3,504 4,485
Rep
NE
Information Technology Subtotal:
1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Administrative Assistant
Assistant Director of Community Development

1.0 4,062 5,201
Rep
NE

1.0 10,908 15,412
MCP
E
Deputy City Manager

1.0 13,289 18,778
Exec
E
Principal Management Analyst (Underfill as Senior Mgmt Analyst)

1.0 7,348 10,383
MCP
E
SARDA/CDBG/Service Level D
Assistant Planner
Senior Planner
Planning
Assistant Planner

0.25 5,600 7,169
Rep
NE

0.35 7,531 10,642
MCP
E

0.75 5,600 7,169
Rep
NE
Associate Planner 1

1.0 6,183 7,913
Rep
NE
Associate Planner 11

2.0 6,824 8,735
Rep
NE
Community Development Technician 1

1.0 4,485 5,740
Rep
NE
Community Development Technician 11

4.0 4,950 6,337
Rep
NE
Office Specialist II

0.5 3,504 4,485
Rep
NE
Planning Manager

1.0 9,176 12,966
MCP
E
Planning Technician

2.0 5,073 6,495
Rep
NE
Senior Management Analyst

1.1 6,657 9,405
MCP
E
Senior Planner

0.65 7,531 10,642
MCP
E
Building and Safety/Code Enforcement
Building Inspector 1

1.0 5,740 7,348
Rep
NE
Building Inspector 11

4.0 6,337 8,110
Rep
NE
Building Official

1.0 10,129 14,311
MCP
E
Code Enforement Officer 1

2.0 4,711 6,030
Rep
NE
Code Enforcement Officer II

1.0 5,201 6,657
Rep
NE
Field Supervisor - Code Enforcement
Office Specialist II
Plan Checker
Senior Code Enforcement Officer
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Office Specialist
Community Development Subtotal:

PUBLIC WORKS
Administrative Assistant
Director of Public Works
Principal Management Analyst
CIP Administration
Associate Civil Engineer
Associate Engineer 11

1.0 5,978 7,651
Rep
NE

0.5 3,504 4,950
Rep
NE

1.0 7,720 9,881
Rep
NE

1.0 5,740 7,348
Rep
NE

0.9 6,657 9,405
MCP
E

2.0 34.0

1.0 3,868 4,950
4,062 5,201
Rep
Rep
NE
NE

1.0 12,966 18,320
Exec
E

1.0 7,348 10,383
MCP
E

3.0 8,110 10,383
Rep
E

3.0 7,720 9,881
Rep
E

City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Mid -Year Budget

SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
As of February 22, 2022
FY2021-22
Number of
Positions
Salary Schedule
Bargaining
Unit* Al
Exempt/Non-
Exempt
Monthly Salary
Minimum Maximum
Engineering Manager

1.0 11,180 15,797
MCP
E
Senior Office Specialist

1.0 3,868 4,950
Rep
NE
Public Works Inspector II

1.0 5,201 6,657
Rep
NE
Senior Civil Engineer

2.0 9,176 12,966
MCP
E
Senior Public Works Inspector (Y-Rate)

1.0 5,922 7,579
Rep
NE
Supervising Public Works Inspector

1.0 6,337 8,110
Rep
NE
Land Development/NPDES
Associate Civil Engineer

2.0 8,110 10,383
Rep
E
Associate Engineer 1

1.0 6,995 8,953
Rep
E
Associate Engineer 11

2.0 7,720 9,881
Rep
E
Engineering Tech 1

1.0 5,201 6,657
Rep
NE
Office Specialist 11

1.0 3,504 4,485
Rep
NE
Principal Civil Engineer

1.0 10,129 14,311
MCP
E
Senior Public Works Inspector

2.0 5,740 7,348
Rep
NE
Traffic
Associate Engineer II

1.0 7,720 9,881
Rep
E
Senior Civil Engineer

1.0 9,176 12,966
MCP
E
Senior Signal Technician

1.0 6,824 8,735
Rep
NE
Signal Technician 1

1.0 5,883 7,531
Rep
NE
Maintenance (Streets, Facilities, Parks)
Custodian I - Facilities

1.0 2,738 3,504
Rep
NE
Custodian 11 (Y-Rate) - Facilities

1.0 3,033 3,882
Rep
NE
Field Supervisor - Facilities

1.0 5,740 7,348
Rep
NE
Landscape Inspector II

1.0 5,464 6,995
Rep
NE
Lead Maintenance Worker- HVAC

1.0 5,740 7,348
Rep
NE
Lead Maintenance Worker - Streets

3.0 4,829 6,183
Rep
NE
Lead Maintenance Worker- Parks

2.0 4,829 6,183
Rep
NE
Lead Maintenance Worker - Facilities

1.0 5,201 6,657
Rep
NE
Maintenance Manager

1.0 8,314 11,746
MCP
E
Maintenance Superintendent

2.0 7,531 10,642
MCP
E
Maintenance Supervisor - Streets/Facilities

1.0 6,824 9,640
MCP
E
Maintenance Worker I - Streets

3.0 3,963 5,073
Rep
NE
Maintenance Worker I - Parks

1.0 3,963 5,073
Rep
NE
Maintenance Worker I - Facilities

2.0 4,268 5,464
Rep
NE
Maintenance Worker 11- Streets/Parks
Management Assistant
Management Assistant (Limited Term)
Senior Landscape Inspector
Public Works Subtotal:

FIRE
Community Development Technician 1
Community Development Technician 11
Fire Inspector 1
Management Analyst

3.0 4,375 5,600
Rep
NE

1.0 4,485 5,740
Rep
NE

1.0 6,030 7,720
Rep
NE

1.0 4,485 5,740
Rep
NE

1.0 4,950 6,337
Rep
NE

1.0 6,657 8,522
Rep
NE

1.0 6,030 8,522
MCP
E
Fire Subtotal:
4 COMMUNITY SERVICES
Aquatics Supervisor II
Community Services Assistant
Community Services Coordinator 1
Community Services Coordinator 11
Community Services Manager

1.0 5,740 7,348
Rep
NE

1.0 3,592 4,597
Rep
NE

1.0 4,597 5,883
Rep
NE

3.0 4,829 6,183
Rep
NE

9.0 7,531 10,642
MCP
E
Community Services Specialist 1

1.0 3,963 5,073
Rep
NE
Community Services Superintendent

2.0 8,314 11,746
MCP
E
Community Services Supervisor 1

3.0 5,330 6,824
Rep
NE
Community Services Supervisor 11

2.0 5,600 7,169
Rep
NE

City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Mid -Year Budget

SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
As of February 22, 2022
FY2021-22
Number of
Positions
Salary Schedule
Bargaining
Unit*
Exempt/Non-
Exempt
Monthly Salary
Minimum Maximum
Director of Community Services
Lead Lifeguard
Management Aide II
Management Assistant
Multimedia Coordinator

1.0 12,040 17,012
Exec
E
NE

1.0 3,021 3,868
Rep

1.0 3,680 4,711
Rep
NE

1.0 4,485 6,337
Rep
NE

1.0 5,600 7,169
Rep
NE
Office Specialist II
Park Ranger 1
Park Ranger II
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Recreation Leader
Theater Technical Assistant
Theater Technical Coordinator 11

1.0 3,504 4,485
Rep
NE

1.0 4,268 5,464
Rep
NE

2.0 4,711 6,030
Rep
NE

1.0 6,657 9,405
MCP
E

1.0 3,021 3,868
Rep
NE

1.0 3,592 4,597
Rep
NE
1 1.0
4,829 6,183
Rep
I NE
Community Services Subtotal:
1 36.0
* Bargaining Units:

Rep = Represented
MCP = Management/Confidential
Exec = Executive
Unfunded positions include: (1) Office Specialist II (PW), (1) *Office Specialist I (TCSD), and (1) *Community Services Manager (TCSD) *The two (TCSD) positions are associated with the Margarita Recreation Center and will remain unfunded until the facility has been rehabilitated and is open for operation.

RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE

CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR
2021-22 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position.

Section 2. That each year a Mid -Year review is conducted of all Temecula Community Services (TCSD) operating budgets.

Section 3. That the Mid -Year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the schedules attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2021-22 TCSD operating budgets are amended in accordance with the attached schedules.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 22" d day of February, 2022.

James Stewart, President
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:

NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:

UIWIIKWQ:••'b a U: :_
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, Secretary
N

EXH I BIT A
Temecula Community
Services District

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 190 - TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FUND
% Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Special Tax (Measure C)
1,892,962
1,872,625
1,057,205
1,872,625
0 0.0
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Development Impact Fees
10 0
670
0 0

0.0 %
Contract Classes
192,941
500,000
458,594
700,000
200,000

40.0 Classes/Activities
41,700
28,391
24,197
27,262
(1,129)
-4.0
Facility Rentals
141,961
202,896
124,380
225,457
22,561

11.1 %
Aquatics
151,008
105,912
80,419
109,912
4,000

3.8 %
Museum Admissions
5,270
30,804
51,962
94,212
63,408
205.8 %
Theater Admissions
743
136,889
1S7,481
233,000
96,111

70.2 %
Sports Leagues & Tournaments
43,057
107,566
74,525
152,205
44,639

41.5 %
Day Camps
75,437
44,740
144
59,540
14,800

33.1 %
Fines and Forfeitures
Fines & Forfeitures
0 50
0 50
0 0.0 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
2,351
600
226
600
0 0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
97,281
90,194
12,308
247,307
157,113
174.2 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
7,897,243
10,002,131
2,500,533
10,002,131
0 0.0 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
(6,356)
45,232
48,955
52,860
7,628

16.9 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
10,535,608
13,168,030
4,591,597
13,777,161
609,131

4.6 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
6,382,842
7,372,670
3,956,561
7,777,255
404,586

5.5 %
Operations & Maintenance
2,188,638
4,018,286
2,729,070
4,444,744
426,458

10.6 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
1,563,188
1,944,332
599,333
1,983,825
39,493

2.0 %
Capital Outlay
7,738
249,300
238,833
354,828
105,528

42.3 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
10,142,407
13,584,588
7,523,797
14,560,653
976,065

7.2 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
393,201
(416,558)
(2,932,200)
(783,492)
(366,934)

88.1 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
845,744
1,238,945
1,238,945
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,238,945
822,387
455,453
Fund Description
Citywide Operations reflects the collection of the Special Tax (Measure C) charged to households for recreation programs as well as fees for classes and activities. Accounts for facility operations, maintenance, and community recreation programs. Measure C was approved by residents in 1997 at a rate of $74.44 per parcel for the purpose of maintaining the City's parks, recreation facilities, arerial street lighting and traffic signals. The Special Tax revenue is allocated equally between TCSD and the General Fund to fund both recreation programs and parks maintenance.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 194 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING FUND % Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
8,664,212
8,633,354
53,865
8,633,354 0

0.0 Recycling Program
5,000
18,500
0 18,500 0

0.0 Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
2,349
1,500
32 1,500 0

0.0 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
0 23,000
0 23,000 0

0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
8,671,561
8,676,354
53,897
8,676,354 0

0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
62,606
60,897
34,413
64,083 3,186

5.2 %
Operations & Maintenance
8,569,988
8,723,598
4,353,995
8,753,679 30,081

0.3 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
8,632,594
8,784,494
4,388,408
8,817,762 33,267

0.4 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
38,967
(108,140)
(4,334,511)
(141,408) (33,267)

30.8 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
147,821
186,788
186,788
Fund Balance, End of Year
186,788
78,648
45,380
Fund Description
Service Level D Fund is used to collect benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of providing refuse
collection, recycling, and street sweeping throughout
the City,
which is provided
by CR&R.

In addition, Service Level D has received
grants to increase recycling efforts Citywide.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 195 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT FUND % Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
5,878 0 115 0 0

0.0 Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
76 0 9 0 0

0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
7,050 0 0 0 0

0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
13,004 0 125 0 0

0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
3,094 0 3,321 10,000 10,000
100.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
3,094 0 3,321 10,000 10,000
100.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
9,910 0 (3,196) (10,000) (10,000)
-100.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
20,778 30,688 30,688
Fund Balance, End of Year
30,688 30,688 20,688
Fund Description
Service Level R Fund reflects the operational, administrative, construction and maintenance costs for certain unpaved roads that
become inaccessible after inclement weather. Zone
R-1 provides service in the Nicolas/Liefer Road area. The maximum rate that can be charged for Zone R-1 for an improved parcel is $115.26 and for an unimproved parcel is $57.62.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 196 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. FUND % Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
257,591
249,197
0 249,197
0 0.0
Harveston Lake Boat Revenue
5,626
4,200
4,530
4,200
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
1,273
2,650
137
2,650
0 0.0 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
390
0 0
0 0

0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
264,880
256,047
4,666
256,047
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
26,921
27,698
1S,991
29,093
1,396
S.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
246,987
285,604
174,121
285,604
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
273,908
313,302
190,113
314,697
1,396

0.4 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(9,028)
(57,255)
(185,446)
(58,650)
(1,396)

2.4 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
418,989
409,961
409,961
Fund Balance, End of Year
409,961
352,706
351,310
Fund Description
Service Level L Fund reflects the benefit assessments
charged to property owners for the purpose of maintaining the Harveston Lake
Park. Expenditures include operational, administrative
and maintenance
costs.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2O21-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 197 - TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
% Change
2021-22
Year to Date
2021-22 Q2
from
2020-21
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2021
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Printing & Copies
2,720
8,919
3,140
6,419
(2,500)
-28.0 %
Fines and Forfeitures
Fines & Forfeitures
4,546
5,000
10,262
16,000
11,000
220.0 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
987
3,000
132
3,000
0 0.0 %
Lease/Rental Income
(1,152)
6,120
4,187
8,120
2,000

32.7 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
19 0
(28)
0 0

0.0 %
Contribution From Measure S
847,181
947,149
236,787
947,149
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
854,302
970,188
254,480
980,688
10,500

1.1 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
129,026
138,773
83,045
147,073
8,300

6.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
286,383
604,134
286,811
568,603
(35,531)
-5.9 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
289,564
368,784
73,092
378,501
9,717

2.6 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
704,973
1,111,691
442,948
1,094,177
(17,514)
-1.6 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
149,328
(141,503)
(188,468)
(113,489)
28,014
-19.8 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
382,653
531,981
531,981
Fund Balance, End of Year
531,981
390,478
418,492
Fund Description
The Library Fund is used to account for the maintenance and operations
of the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library on Pauba Road.

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 501 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments 38,597 37,932 0 37,932 0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 25 6 4 6 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 38,622 37,938 4 37,938 0 0.0 % Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits 2 3 1 3 0 5.1
Operations & Maintenance 36,046 36,817 28,766 41,817 5,000 13.6 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 36,048 36,820 28,768 41,820 5,000 13.6 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 2,574 1,118 (28,763) (3,882) (5,000) -447.1 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 11,759 14,333 14,333
Fund Balance, End of Year 14,333 15,451 10,451
Fund Description
Service Level C Fund reflects the collection of benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of providing perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance throughout the City. Service Level C assesses only those parcels within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and are separated into 32 zones. The rate levels for Zones 6 and 29, are subject to a Consumer Price Index -Urban Consumers (CPI-U) annual inflator while all other rate levels will not increase. Zones 30-32 will not be assessed, as the property owners have elected to have the landscaping maintained by the respective Homeowner's Associations (HOAs).

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 502 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK FUND % Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
43,056
42,542
0 42,542
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
316
715
33 71S
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
43,373
43,257
33 43,257
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
36 25
15 27
1 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
37,992
38,723
25,912
38,723
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
38,028
38,748
25,927
38,750
1 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
5,344
4,509
(25,893)
4,507
(1)

0.0 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
106,329
111,673
111,673
Fund Balance, End of Year
111,673
116,182
116,181
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 503 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS FUND % Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
47,394
47,328
0 47,328
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
118
220
14 220
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
47,512
47,548
14 47,548
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
25 25
15 27
1 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
42,730
45,181
30,883
45,181
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
42,755
45,206
30,898
45,208
1 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
4,757
2,342
(30,884)
2,340
(1)
-0.1
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
41,707
46,464
46,464
Fund Balance, End of Year
46,464
48,806
48,804
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 504 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
6,371
10 6,394
18 0
1 6,394
18 0
0 0.0

0.0 6,381
6,412
1 6,412
0 0.0 %
27 5,833
25 6,124
89 4,105
27 7,124
1 1,000

5.1 16.3
5,861
6,149
4,195
7,151
1,001

16.3 %
521
263
(4,193)
(739)
(1,001)
-381.1 %
4,206
4,727
4,727
4,727
4,989
3,988

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 505 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
39,571
73 39,025
130
0 10
39,025
130
0 0

0.0 0.0
39,644
39,155
10 39,155
0 0.0 %
36 35,548
25 36,920
15 29,083
27 51,920
1 15,000

5.1 40.6
35,584
36,945
29,098
51,946
15,001

40.6 %
4,060
2,210
(29,089)
(12,791)
(15,001)
-678.8 %
27,142
31,202
31,202
31,202
33,412
18,410

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 506 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY FUND % Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
27,104
27,260
0 27,260
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
114
240
11 240
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
27,218
27,500
11 27,500
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
25 25
15 27
1 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
29,541
25,494
15,191
25,494
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
29,566
25,519
15,206
25,520
1 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(2,348)
1,981
(15,194)
1,980
(1)
-0.1
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
39,248
36,900
36,900
Fund Balance, End of Year
36,900
38,881
38,880
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 507 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
15,593
15,308
0 15,308
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
19 26
3 26
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
15,611
15,334
3 15,334
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
13 3
1 3
0 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
13,177
15,134
10,129
19,134
4,000

26.4 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
13,190
15,137
10,130
19,137
4,000

26.4 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,421
197
(10,127)
(3,803)
(4,000)
-2,025.7 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
7,571
9,992
9,992
Fund Balance, End of Year
9,992
10,190
6,190
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 508 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
138,618
137,025
0 137,025
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
303
530
33 530
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
138,921
137,555
33 137,555
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
12,680
12,632
7,421
13,273
642

5.1 Operations & Maintenance
129,863
121,106
95,356
121,106
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
142,543
133,738
102,777
134,379
642

0.5 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(3,622)
3,817
(102,744)
3,176
(642)
-16.8
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
113,379
109,757
109,757
Fund Balance, End of Year
109,757
113,574
112,933
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 510 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
9,802
9,744
0 9,744
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
38 80
4 80
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
9,840
9,824
4 9,824
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
30 25
15 27
1 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
8,255
10,378
5,675
10,378
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
8,284
10,403
5,690
10,405
1 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,556
(579)
(5,686)
(581)
(1)

0.2 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
13,326
14,882
14,882
Fund Balance, End of Year
14,882
14,302
14,301
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 511 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
2,450
9 2,450
20 0
1 2,450
20 0
0 0.0

0.0 2,459
2,470
1 2,470
0 0.0 %
3 1,969
3 2,368
1 1,194
3 3,368
0 1,000

5.1 42.2
1,972
2,371
1,196
3,371
1,000

42.2 %
488
99 (1,194)
(901)
(1,000)
-1,005.5 %
3,435
3,923
3,923
3,923
4,022
3,022

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 512 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
99,464
318
96,396
665
0 35
96,396
665
0 0

0.0 0.0
99,782
97,061
35 97,061
0 0.0 %
6,421
93,509
6,316
90,423
3,710
67,302
6,637
130,423
321
40,000

5.1 44.2
99,931
96,739
71,013
137,060
40,321

41.7 %
(149)
322
(70,978)
(39,999)
(40,321)
-12,514.2 %
117,007
116,858
116,858
116,858
117,181
76,860

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 513 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP FUND % Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
35,020
34,224
0 34,224
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
75 140
9 140
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
35,096
34,364
9 34,364
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
635
632
372
664
32 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
31,716
32,539
23,168
32,539
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
32,351
33,171
23,540
33,203
32 0.1 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,744
1,193
(23,531)
1,161
(32)
-2.7
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
28,031
30,775
30,775
Fund Balance, End of Year
30,775
31,969
31,937
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 514 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES FUND % Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
15,041
14,774
0 14,774
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
28 50
4 50
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
15,069
14,824
4 14,824
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
5 3
1 3
0 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
13,192
13,797
8,312
16,297
2,500

18.1 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
13,197
13,800
8,313
16,300
2,500

18.1 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,872
1,024
(8,310)
(1,476)
(2,500)
-244.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
10,439
12,311
12,311
Fund Balance, End of Year
12,311
13,335
10,835
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 515 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES FUND % Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
9,713
9,800
0 9,800
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
28 60
4 60
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
9,741
9,860
4 9,860
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
5 3
1 3
0 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
8,181
8,352
5,650
11,702
3,350

40.1 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
8,186
8,355
5,652
11,705
3,350

40.1 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,555
1,505
(5,648)
(1,845)
(3,350)
-222.5 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
10,458
12,013
12,013
Fund Balance, End of Year
12,013
13,518
10,168
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 516 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
38,150
37,800
0 37,800
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
169
370
20 370
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
38,319
38,170
20 38,170
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
637
632
372
664
32 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
28,010
35,440
18,877
35,440
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
28,647
36,072
19,249
36,104
32 0.1 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
9,672
2,098
(19,229)
2,066
(32)
-1.5
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
56,539
66,211
66,211
Fund Balance, End of Year
66,211
68,309
68,277
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 518 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
96,445
148
94,010
224
0 19
94,010
224
0 0

0.0 0.0
96,593
94,234
19 94,234
0 0.0 %
3,789
88,495
3,789
85,107
2,227
64,855
3,982
110,107
192
25,000

5.1 29.4
92,283
88,896
67,082
114,089
25,192

28.3 %
4,310
5,338
(67,063)
(19,855)
(25,192)
-472.0 %
57,983
62,293
62,293
62,293
67,631
42,438

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 519 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
54,852
54,450
0 54,450
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
293
600
26 600
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
S5,144
S5,OS0
26 S5,050
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
5,263
5,305
3,117
5,575
269

5.1 Operations & Maintenance
58,274
51,116
41,521
51,116
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
63,538
56,422
44,638
56,691
269

0.5 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(8,393)
(1,372)
(44,612)
(1,641)
(269)

19.6 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
96,147
87,754
87,754
Fund Balance, End of Year
87,754
86,382
86,113
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 520 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
181,358
177,975
0 177,975
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
654
1,360
71 1,360
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
182,013
179,335
71 179,335
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
12,625
12,632
7,418
13,273
642

5.1 Operations & Maintenance
167,717
161,142
111,006
161,142
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
180,343
173,773
118,424
174,415
642

0.4 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,670
5,562
(118,353)
4,920
(642)
-11.5
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
231,135
232,805
232,805
Fund Balance, End of Year
232,805
238,367
237,725
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 521 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
232,438
228,201
0 228,201
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
656
1,250
60 1,250
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
233,094
229,451
60 229,451
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
23,888
24,000
14,130
25,219
1,219

5.1 Operations & Maintenance
245,057
223,368
162,756
223,368
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
268,944
247,368
176,886
248,587
1,219

0.5 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(35,850)
(17,917)
(176,826)
(19,136)
(1,219)

6.8 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
231,569
195,719
195,719
Fund Balance, End of Year
195,719
177,802
176,582
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 522 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
4,466
4,408
0 4,408
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
28 64
3 64
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
4,494
4,472
3 4,472
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
4 3
1 3
0 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
3,442
4,122
2,746
5,622
1,500

36.4 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
3,446
4,125
2,747
5,625
1,500

36.4 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,048
347
(2,744)
(1,153)
(1,500)
-431.7 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
9,659
10,707
10,707
Fund Balance, End of Year
10,707
11,055
9,555
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 523 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
8,779
8,400
0 8,400
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
62 145
7 145
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
8,841
8,545
7 8,545
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
41 51
29 53
3 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
6,426
7,197
3,375
7,197
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
6,467
7,247
3,404
7,250
3 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,374
1,298
(3,397)
1,295
(3)
-0.2
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
21,293
23,667
23,667
Fund Balance, End of Year
23,667
24,965
24,962
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 524 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
165,046
162,100
0 162,100
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
159
120
17 120
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
165,205
162,220
17 162,220
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
10,095
10,105
5,950
10,619
513

5.1 Operations & Maintenance
164,365
145,057
121,196
165,057
20,000

13.8 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
174,459
155,162
127,145
175,675
20,513

13.2 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(9,255)
7,058
(127,128)
(13,455)
(20,513)
-290.6 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
64,701
55,446
55,446
Fund Balance, End of Year
55,446
62,504
41,991
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 525 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
44,736
44,000
0 44,000
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
19S
420
21 420
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
44,931
44,420
21 44,420
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
1,269
1,263
744
1,327
64 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
41,962
41,713
34,310
41,713
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
43,231
42,977
35,053
43,041
64 0.1 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,700
1,443
(35,032)
1,379
(64)
-4.4
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
68,272
69,972
69,972
Fund Balance, End of Year
69,972
71,415
71,351
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 527 - SERVICE LEVEL" C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
9,371
9,100
0 9,100
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
25 43
3 43
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
9,396
9,143
3 9,143
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
28 25
15 27
1 5.1
Operations & Maintenance
9,292
7,870
5,203
7,870
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
9,321
7,895
5,218
7,897
1 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
75 1,248
(5,215)
1,246
(1)
-0.1
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
9,186
9,261
9,261
Fund Balance, End of Year
9,261
10,509
10,508
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 528 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK FUND
% Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
236,513
232,974
0 232,974
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
303
2,370
49 2,370
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
236,816
235,344
49 235,344
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
0 400,000
0 300,000
(100,000)
-25.0 %
Salaries & Benefits
25,097
25,263
14,872
26,546
1,283

5.1 %
Operations & Maintenance
271,041
209,045
164,531
209,045
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
296,138
634,308
179,403
535,591
(98,717)
-15.6 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(59,322)
(398,964)
(179,354)
(300,247)
98,717
-24.7
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
395,420
336,098
336,098
Fund Balance, End of Year
336,098
(62,866)
35,851
Fund Description

Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year2021-22
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 529 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT FUND % Change
2021-22 Year to Date 2021-22 Q2 from
2020-21 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2021 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
3,754
4,249
0 4,249
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
10 21
2 21
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
3,764
4,270
2 4,270
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
4 3
(1,741)
3 0

5.1 Operations & Maintenance
2,114
3,424
1,583
4,424
1,000

29.2 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
2,117
3,427
(158)
4,427
1,000

29.2 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,647
843
160
(157)
(1,000)
-118.6 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
3,548
5,195
5,195
Fund Balance, End of Year
5,195
6,038
5,038
Fund Description

RESOLUTION NO.2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2022-26

AND AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that:

A. On May 19, 2021, the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program projects are consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65401 of State Planning and Zoning Law.

B. On June 8, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-32 approving the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2022-26 (CIP).

C. Adoption of the Amendments noted herein are categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Sections 15262 and 15061 (b) (3) of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions because it can be seen with certainty that this prioritizing and fund allocation program set forth in the Amendment cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment.

No physical activity will occur until all required CEQA review is conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the Amendment are undertaken. The Council reaffirms and incorporates herein the findings set forth in Section 1 of Resolution No. 2021-32.

Section 2. Specific Actions: Based on the findings above, the City Council determines and declares the following adjustments to the Fiscal Year "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2022- 26" are hereby adopted:

A. Amend the 2021-22 appropriation for the Diaz Road Expansion project, to allocate $1,000,000 in Measure A funding required for construction of Diaz Road Expansion, Rancho California to Diaz Road.

B. Amend the 2021-22 appropriation for the Bike Lane and Trail Program — Infill Mini Pump Track project, to allocate an additional $100,000 in Measure S funds for additional costs at Long Canyon Creek and Wolf Creek Parks.

C. Amend the 2021-22 appropriation for Sports Field Lighting LED Conversion project, to allocate $200,000 in Measure S funds to provide adequate funds for one ballfield conversion.

D. Amend the 2021-22 appropriation for the Citywide Surveillance Cameras project, to allocate $600,000 in Measure S funds to expand the project to Harveston Park.

E. Amend the 2021-22 appropriation for the City Facilities Rehabilitation project, to allocate $100,000 in funding from Facilities Replacement Fund for necessary roof repairs for Fire Station Facilities.

F. Amend the 2021-22 appropriation for the Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland project, to allocate $1,000,000 in Measure S funds to complete engineering design and environmental review.

G. Amend the 2021-22 appropriation for the Bike Lane and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting project, to reduce funding by $100,000 from Service Level C — Zone 28 to fit within available funding levels.

H. Amend the project description of the Old Town Parking Structure project to include other parking improvements in Old Town.

I. Amend the Fiscal Years 2021-26 Capital Improvement Program to add the following new projects subject to future Planning Commission determination that the projects are consistent with the City's General Plan:
a. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure project, with an appropriation of $75,000 in Measure S Funds;
b. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink project, with an appropriation of $750,000 in Measure S Funds;
c. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park project, with an appropriation of $1,000,000 in Measure S Funds;
d. Fiber Optic Communications Systems — Citywide project, with an appropriation of $1,200,000 in Measure S Funds;
e. Murrieta Creek Regional Sports Park phase project, with an appropriation of $1,000,000 in FY21-22 funded with Quimby Funds; $1,500,000 in FY22-23 funded with Measure S funds; remainder as unspecified.

The budget and appropriation for these projects are set forth in Exhibit 1 and are hereby approved.

Section 3. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of February, 2022.

Matt Rahn, Mayor
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk

EXHIBIT 1
Capital Improvement Program

111 The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country

DIAZ ROAD EXPANSION
Circulation Project
Project Description: Converts Diaz Road into a Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided) classification, between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. Improvements will be added to Diaz Road on its current alignment as shown in the Roadway Plan of the General Plan's Circulation Element. This project includes the design, environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, and construction necessary to complete the 2.2 mile segment, which will be developed and constructed in phases: Phase 1: Diaz Road from Winchester Rd to Rancho California Rd and Phase 2: Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Rd.

Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation by expanding an important north -south arterial on the west side of the City and completes a portion of the designated Western Bypass.

Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity
Project Status: Phase 1 is in the design and environmental clearance phase.

Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.521 / PW17-25 Level: III
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
Project Cost:

Prior Years
Actuals
2020-21
Adjusted
2021-22
Adopted
Budget
Mid -Year
Adjustment
2021-22
Revised
Budget
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Projected Projected Projected
2025-26
Projected
Total Project
Cost
Administration
39,799
123,714
8,522
8,522
60,000
139,478
371,513
Construction
1,000,000
1,000,000
5,700,000
2,800,000
9,500,000
Construction Engineering
560,000
255,000
815,000
Design & Environmental
332,845
733,078
223,555
280,000
1,569,478
MSHCP
285,000
140,000
425,000
Total Expenditures
372,644
856,792
8,522
1,000,000
1,008,522
6,828,555
3,614,478
12,680,991
Source of Funds:

DIF-Street Improvements
590
590
Measure S
162,923
8,522 8,522 3,328,555
3,500,000
Measure A
1,000,000 1,000,000
1,000,000

TUMF (WRCOG)
1,065,923 3,500,000
4,565,923
Unspecified
3,614,478
3,614,478
Total Funding
163,513
1,065,923 8,522 1,000,000 1,008,522 6,828,555 3,614,478 12,680,991
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs
Notes :

1. TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to approval of the Public Works Committee to program PAED and ENG to Diaz Road (designated Western Bypass). After the approval of the WRCOG Executive Committee, an agreement between the City and WRCOG will need to be executed. After the PAED and ENG phases are complete, City will request that any unused funds be reprogrammed to the CON phase.

The Heart of Southern California
wipe c—,

BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - INFILL MINI PUMP TRACK
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: The City opened the Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track in November of 2019. The Mini Pump track was also opened in December of 2020 at the same site. The projects have mostly positive post construction feedback and a consistently high use rate. In order to bring this type of usage to other locations in the City, staff is investigating existing park sites or other City owned properties where a mini pump track or bike skills area that is similar in cost and scale to the Mini Pump Track at RRSP.

Benefit: This project supports healthy and active lifestyles by promoting recreation programs, parks, trails, and facilities. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Sustainable City and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity.

Core Value: A Sustainable City
Project Status: Project is estimated to be complete by Fiscal Year 2021-22.

Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.761
Level:I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
2021-22 2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21 Adopted Mid -Year Revised 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted Budget Adjustment Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost
Administration
30,000 30,000
30,000
Construction
170,000 100,000 270,000
270,000
Total Expenditures
200,000 100,000 300,000
300,000
Source of Funds:

Measure S I I 200,000 100,000 300,000 I 300,000
Total Funding 200,000 100,000 300,000 300,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

The Heart of Southern California
wipe c—,

SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING - LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) CONVERSION Parks/Recreation Project
Project Description: This project provides for the replacement of the aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports parks.

Benefit: This project enhances the safety of sport field users, reduces unnecessary light pollution and increases energy efficiency at City parks.

Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: Project will be completed on an on -going basis as funding becomes available.

Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.113 / Various Level:I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
2021-22
2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21
Adopted
Mid -Year
Revised 2022-23 2023-24
2024-25 2025-26
Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted
Budget
Adjustment
Budget Projected Projected
Projected Projected
Cost
Construction
407,453
422,547
100,000
200,000
300,000
1,130,000
Total Expenditures
407,453
422,547
100,000
200,000
300,000
1,130,000
Source of Funds:

Measure 5
TEAM
530,000
100,000 100,000 200,000 300,000
200,000 -
930,000
200,000
Total Funding
530,000
300,000 100,000 200,000 300,000
1,130,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs
Notes :

1. TEAM - Temecula Energy Efficiency Asset Management Fund

The Heart of Southern California
wipe c—,

CITYWIDE SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: The Citywide Camera Surveillance system will be utilized by the City to support public safety, traffic management, and asset protection activities in service to its citizens. The City's goal for the system is to standardize and integrate existing and new video management systems to provide video technology to improve overall safety and security to the residents of the City.

Benefit: To protect property and life. This project provides Police the ability to perform virtual patrols, maximizing staff efficiency and resources.

Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: Project is estimated to be complete by Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Department: Information Systems - Account No. 210.265.999.711 / PW17-01 Level:I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
2021-22
2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21 Adopted
Mid -Year
Revised
2022-23 2023-24
2024-25 2025-26
Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted Budget
Adjustment
Budget
Projected Projected
Projected Projected
Cost
Administration
2,593
-
2,593
Construction
2,990,864
164,628
600,000
600,000
95,000
3,850,492
Design & Environmental
138,347
353
-
138,700
Total Expenditures
13,131,8041
164,981
600,000
600,000
95,000
3,991,785
Source of Funds:

DIF-Corporate Facilities
503,778
248,309
752,087
DIF-Police Facilities
526,113
- 95,000
621,113
Measure S
1,468,585
550,000 600,000 600,000
2,618,585
Total Funding
2,498,476
798,309 600,000 600,000 95,000
3,991,785
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
Notes :

1. Operating & Maintenance costs reflect the ongoing software and equipment maintenance associated with the infrastructure of the surveillance system.

The Heart of Southern California
wipe c—,

CITY FACILITIES REHABILITATION
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation projects at City owned and operated facilities such as the Pat Birdsall Sports Park Concessionaire Building, Old Town Parking Garage, Old Town Theater, History Museum, Old Town Police Substation, CRC Amphitheater, Temecula Elementary School pool and locker room, and other various facilities. The rehabilitation projects could include, but are not limited to, parking lot rehabilitation and light replacements, heating ventilation and air conditioner (HVAC) upgrades, roof repairs, carpet and flooring replacement, cabinet re-facing/replacement, concrete repairs, replacement of fencing and repair of swimming pools.

Benefit: This project minimizes emergency repair costs, prolongs the service life of facilities, and upgrades aging facility components.

Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitation projects are completed on an ongoing basis as funding becomes available.

Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.701 / Various Level:I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
2021-22
2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21
Adopted
Mid -Year
Revised 2022-23 2023-24
2024-25 2025-26
Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted
Budget
Adjustment
Budget Projected Projected
Projected Projected
Cost
Administration
158,660
25,001
25,000
25,000
208,661
Construction
2,230,192
258,786
300,000
100,000
400,000
2,888,978
Design & Environmental
46,026
25,000
25,000
25,000
96,026
Total Expenditures
2,434,879
308,787
350,000
100,000
450,000
3,193,666
Source of Funds:

DIF-Corporate Facilities
250,000
- -
250,000
Facilities Replacement Fund
443,666
300,000 350,000 100,000 450,000
1,193,666
General Fund
1,750,000
-
1,750,000
Total Funding
2,443,666
300,000 350,000 100,000 450,000
3,193,666
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

111 The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country

MURRIETA CREEK BRIDGE AT OVERLAND
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. This project also includes environmental studies, mitigation, acquisition of right-of-way, and installation of new traffic signals at Overland Drive intersections with Diaz Road and Enterprise Circle West and Commerce.

Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation and access to Overland Drive freeway over -crossing.

Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity
Project Status: This project is currently in design and is partially funded by the Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP). During design phase staff will continue seeking additional programming and allocation of more HBP funds for the project.

Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.648 / PW16-05 Level: I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
Project Cost:

Prior Years
Actuals
2020-21
Adjusted
2021-22
Adopted
Budget
Mid -Year
Adjustment
2021-22
Revised 2022-23
Budget Projected
2023-24 2024-25
Projected Projected
2025-26
Projected
Total Project
Cost
Administration
115,803
124,197
-
30,000
270,000
Construction
1,000,000
1,000,000
15,888,400
16,888,400
Construction Engineering
_
2,383,260
2,383,260
Design & Environmental
387,946
476,113
836,213
836,213
1,700,272
Land Acquisition
150,000
3,886,200
3,886,200
4,036,200
MSHCP
739,140
-
55,280
794,420
Total Expenditures
503,750
1,489,450
4,722,413
1,000,000
5,722,413 -
18,356,940
25,072,553
Source of Funds:

DIF-Street Improvements
2,010,960
- _ 3,251,615
5,262,575
Measure S
1,000,000 1,000,000
1,000,000
HBP-Highway Bridge Program
571,832 4,631,804 4,631,804 14,606,342
19,809,978
Total Funding
2,010,960
571,832 4,631,804 1,000,000 5,631,804 - 17,857,957
25,072,553
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs
Total Operating Costs I I - I
Notes :

1. Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Funding is 88.53% of participating items only.

2. DIF Street Improvements funding covers 11.47%of participating items and 100% of non -participating items.

3. HBP funding is authorized for reimbursement by Caltrans in a piecemeal fashion based on project progress, available funding in any given year, and the progress of other projects in the program.

4. When HBP funds are authorized for reimbursement by Caltrans, the reimbursable fiscal year may or may not be identified.

5. While the HBP recognizes the total project cost, it does not program its funds into the future.

The Heart of Southern California
wipe C—,

BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - GREAT OAK TRAIL LIGHTING
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: This project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road (approximately 1.70 miles, or 8,976 feet).

Benefit: This project improves pedestrian and biking experience and enhances safety along the subject trail.

Core Value: A Sustainable City
Project Status: This is a new project. Design and preparation of the construction documents will commence after City Council approval.

Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.768
Level:I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
Project Cost:

Prior Years
Actuals
2021-22 2021-22
2020-21 Adopted Mid -Year Revised 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Adjusted Budget Adjustment Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project
Cost
Administration
55,000 55,000
55,000
Construction
300,000 (100,000) 200,000
200,000
Construction Engineering
25,000 25,000
25,000
Design & Environmental
20,000 20,000
20,000
Total Expenditures
400,000 (100,000) 300,000
300,000
Service Level C - Zone 28 400,000 (100,000) 300,000 300,000 Total Funding 400,000 (100,000) 300,000 300,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

The Heart of Southern California
wine Country

OLD TOWN PARKING STRUCTURE
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: This project will include the design and eventual construction of a new parking structure in Old Town and other parking improvements within the Old Town district. The Old Town Parking Management Plan outlines a number of parking strategies that can be implemented in Old Town over time.

Additional parking structures are anticipated to be constructed as part of the long term parking management strategy.

Benefit: This project will satisfy the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City and Economic Prosperity.

Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: This project is currently on hold.

Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.694 / PW17-15 Level: III
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
2021-22 2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21 Adopted Mid -Year Revised 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted Budget Adjustment Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost
Administration
98,888
6,112
105,000
Design & Environmental
44,154
850,846
895,000
Total Expenditures
143,042
856,958
1,000,000
Source of Funds:

General Fund I 1,000,0001 I 1,000,000
Total Funding 11,000,000 1,000,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

AIWA
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program

RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK PUMP TRACK SHADE STRUCTURE
Parks/Recreation Project
Project Description: This project will provide for the installation of shade structures adjacent to the Ronald Reagan Sport Park Pump Track and launch pad area.

Benefit: The shade structure will provide shade for users waiting to enter the pump track area. this project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Health and Livable City.

Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: New
Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.NEW1 / TBD Level: I
2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21 Requested 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost
Administration
5,000
5,000
Construction
65,000
65,000
Design & Environmental
5,000
5,000
Total Expenditures
75,000 -
75,000
Source of Funds:

Measure S 75,000 75,000
Total Funding 75,000 75,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

f
Adk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country

RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK HOCKEY RINK
Parks/Recreation Project
Project Description: This project will include the renovation of the existing hockey rink to install new flooring material and arena style roof structure.

Benefit: This project will upgrade the existing aging facility and provide state- of-the-art recreation opportunity for the City's residents. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and Responsive City Government.

Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: NEW
Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.NEW2 / TBD Level: I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21 Requested 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost
Administration
10,000
10,000
Construction
720,000
720,000
Design & Environmental
20,000
20,000
Total Expenditures
750,000 -
750,000
Source of Funds:

Measure S 750,000 750,000
Total Funding 750,000 750,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

Alk
c7"
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country

RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK SKATE PARK
Parks/Recreation Project
Project Description: This project will remove and replace the existing skate park and install state-of-the-art street skate plaza elements.

Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: NEW
Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.NEW3 / TBD Level: I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21 Requested 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost
Administration
25,000
25,000
Construction
895,000
895,000
Design & Environmental
80,000
80,000
Total Expenditures
1,000,000 -
1,000,000
Source of Funds:

Measure S 1,000,000 1,000,000
Total Funding 1,000,000 1,000,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

AIWA
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS— CITYWIDE
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: This project will provide for the design and installation of fiber optic cable and conduit at various locations throughout the City.

Benefit: This project will upgrade the City's fiber optic communications and traffic signal system equipment throughout the City, including preparation of a Communications System Master Plan to guide the implementation of future communications and technology improvements connecting traffic signals, facilities and other infrastructure throughout the City. This project will enhance the City's core value of a safe and prepared community, as well as transportation mobility and connectivity as it relates to traffic signal communication.

Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community
Project Status: NEW
Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.NEW4 / TBD Level: I
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21 Requested 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost
Administration
100,000 50,000
150,000
Construction
600,000 1,050,000
1,650,000
Design & Environmental
1 1500,000 100,000
1600,000
Total Expenditures
- 1,200,000 - 1,200,000
2,400,000
Source of Funds:

Measure 5
Unspecified
1,200,000
1,200,000
1,200,000
1,200,000
Total Funding
1,200,000 - 1,200,000
2,400,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

f
Adk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country

MURRIETA CREEK REGIONAL SPORTS PARK
Parks/Recreation Project
Project Description: This project will provide for the design and construction of a regional sports park facility in the Riverside County Flood Control District detention basin near Jefferson Avenue and Sanborn Avenue. It will include soccer fields, walking paths, and parking.

Benefit: This project will provide a much needed recreational facility for the residents of the City and the region. This project aligns with the City's core value of a healthy and livable City, as well as investment in parks and open space facilities.

Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: NEW
Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.NEW5 / TBD Level: I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2022-26
Capital Improvement Program
2021-22
Prior Years
2020-21 Requested 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Total Project
Project Cost:

Actuals
Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost
Administration
200,000 200,000 150,000
550,000
Construction
1,100,000 5,300,000
6,400,000
Design & Environmental
800,000 200,000 50,000
1,050,000
Total Expenditures
- 1,000,000 1,500,000 5,500,000
8,000,000
Source of Funds:

D I F-Quimby
1,000, 000
1,000,000
Measure S
1,500,000
1,500,000
Unspecified
5,500,000
5,500,000
Total Funding
1,000,000 1,500,000 5,500,000
8,000,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:

Total Operating Costs

Item No. 20

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 22, 2022
SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report.

The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of January 2022.

CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Planning processed 27 new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted four (4) Public Hearings in January 2022. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report.

PlanType
January 2022
Development Plan
1 General Plan Amendment
1 Home Occupation
30 Maps
2 Massage Permits
3 M in or Exception
1 M odifications
8 Pre -Application
7 Temporary Use Permit
1 i rele ss Anten na Facility
1 Zoning or Planning Letter
2 Total
57 Everhome Suites (PA21-1350): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 64,500 square foot, four-story, 117 room Everhome Suites Hotel located on the west side of Madison Ave. between Buecking Dr. and McCabe Ct. (COOPER)
Temecula Village Phase II (PAs 20-0323, 20-0324, 20-0325, 20-0326): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 134 unit multi -family community built on 7.61 acres; a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel; a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO)

to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village). The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis and with an environmental consultant to prepare and environmental document. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. (COOPER) Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER)
Solana Winchester (PA20-1371): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 350-unit apartment community located within the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan at the terminus of Date Street approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road. The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. (COOPER) Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station (PAs 21-0075, 21-0076): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling pumps, convenience store, quick service restaurant, and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480 Sanborn Avenue. (COOPER)
Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA21-0128): The City is processing a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. (COOPER)
Firenze (PA21-1023): The City is processing a Development Plan application for an approximately 498,557 square foot hotel and apartment project. The approximately 148,545 square foot, five story, 224 room hotel includes a conference center, restaurant, wine market multi -tenant space, and outdoor courtyard dining space. The approximately 350,012 square foot, seven story, 121 unit apartment building include a roof top area that contains a pool/spa, cabanas, fire pit, media wall, kitchen, fitness area, and lawn/game area. The parking for the project is located on the interior of the apartment building that is wrapped with the residential units. The project is located approximately 665 feet north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. (COOPER)
Prado (PAs 21-0838, 21-0839): The City is processing Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map applications for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres consisting of detached rental condominiums. The project includes a clubhouse, pool, bocce ball court, cornhole court, tot lot walking paths, and fitness center. The project is located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road. (COOPER)
MS Mountain View Ph. IV (PAs 21-1470, 21-1471, 21-1472): The City is processing three (3) Development Plan applications for industrial buildings of 9,867 square feet, 19,727 square feet, and 38,714 square feet located along Avenida Alvarado. (COOPER)
Jefferson/Buecking Apartments (PA21-1454): The City is processing a Development Plan application for a 260 unit apartment community located on the north and south side of Buecking Drive at the Jefferson Avenue intersection. (COOPER)

Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan Update (PA21-1525): The City is processing a Modification to the previously approved Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan. The updated Master Plan, at buildout will include the existing 237,305 square foot hospital building and 5,180 square foot storage building along with an approximately 102,000 square foot, four story Behavioral Health Building in Phase 2, an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the emergency department, a 125,000 square foot, five story second hospital tower, a 80,000 square foot medical office buildings, and a 12,600 square foot utility plant in Phase 3, and an approximately 125,000 square foot, five story third hospital tower, a 80,000 square three story foot medical office building, and a four story parking structure with the existing helipad relocated to the roof of the structure in Phase 4. The project is located at 31700 Temecula Parkway. (COOPER) Temecula Resort and Spa (PAs 22-0035, 22-0037): The City is processing a Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map for an approximately 474,137 square foot, seven (7) story, 90-foot high full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden located on the east side of Front Street between 1 st Street and 2nd Street. (COOPER)

LONG RANGE PLANNING
General Plan Update
The Long Range Planning Division has developed a four -phase, multi -year process to update the General Plan. Phase I is complete and included updates to Housing and Public Safety Elements. Phase I also included an update to the City's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to analyze Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) for CEQA. Phase II is in process and includes an update to the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), reconciling the City's GIS Maps on a parcel by parcel basis, a baseline EIR analysis of the City's Circulation Element, and developing a Complete Streets Policy document. Phase III will include a Fiscal Land Use Study to analyze the City's remaining development capacity and market absorption potential for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The final phase is to work with a General Plan Advisory Committee to update to the General Plan and EIR over an 18-month timeframe. (PETERS) Quality of Life Master Plan Update
On April 27, 2021, the City Council established a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP). The QLMP identifies the City's six core values, including: 1) Healthy and Livable City; 2) Economic Prosperity; 3) Safe and Prepared Community; 4) Sustainable City; 5) Transportation Mobility and Connectivity; and 6) Accountable and Responsive City Government. Projects and programs proposed in the City's Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Program must be consistent with the City's Core Values. Performance measures (indicators) are measured annually to track progress and the completion of goals and objectives. (PETERS)
Expanded Outdoor Dining and Retail in Old Town: Staff brought this item before City Council on June 8, 2021 for further discussion. The City Council directed staff to extend the temporary program for one year and develop a permanent outdoor dining program. (PETERS, WATSON) Permit Ready ADU Program (LR19-1464): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare, adopt, and implement a Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. The ADU program will encourage the construction of ADUs,

offering property owners a selection of pre -approved ADU building plans that can be obtained at the community Development Department, free of charge. On September 16, 2020, the RFP closed on PlanetBids. The City received three detailed proposals from qualified consultants. After detailed review of all the proposals, staff selected checkerboardSTUDIOS Consultant Firm. On March 18, 2021, staff kicked off the project with the Consultant and staff from Planning, Building, Public Works, and Fire. This will be a joined effort between the internal departments and the consultant. Staff is working with the consultant on the first task (Phase 1: Schematic Design), staff has provided feedback of the Schematic Design taking into consideration the School District and Development Impact Fee (DIF) fees, and appropriate unit type and size. On, October 19, 2021, staff presented at the draft site plan and architecture designs to the Southern Riverside County Association of Realtors (SRCAR). On November 30, 2021, staff held an Open House to solicit feedback from the professional community (i.e., Engineers, Contractors, Architects, etc.), the meeting will be open to the public. The next step is for the Consultant to complete the construction drawings to make available for the public. (RABIDOU)
Transportation Discovery and Existing Conditions Analysis (LR20-1071): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal document for staff to identify potential transportation focused areas as part of Phase 2 of our General Plan Update process and timeline. The City has hired Fehr & Peers (F&P) to document existing transportation conditions in the City, provide benchmarking information on how transportation facilities, transportation use and policies compares to other peer agencies (through benchmarking) and will evaluate how much of the current Circulation Element has been implemented. Staff worked with F&P to identify methodology, thresholds, and mitigation to address VMT for CEQA evaluation, which the City Council adopted in May 2020. On July 19, 2021, Staff has a scheduled internal meeting with Fehr & Peers, they present to staff the Data Collection Status. Currently, the consultant is developing the three scenario runs to be reviewed by staff prior to conducting a full model run. (PETERS)
Mobile Food Trucks (LR20-1472): On February 23, 2021, staff presented to the Economic Development Subcommittee members (ME/JS) on Mobile Food Trucks (MFT). This was a noticed meeting with one public comment in favor of MFT, read by Stuart Fisk. The intent of the meeting was to get the subcommittee's feedback on the potential for MFT to operate in the City. Staff presented the definition of MFTs, existing regulations, standards of operation to consider, and Pros & Cons list. The subcommittee advised staff to create a framework and come back to the committee for discussion. Staff is working on developing the framework. (COLLINS)
Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Parks Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan.

The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. (PETERS) Live Entertainment: Staff is working on an updated live entertainment ordinance. This is a continuation of quality -of -life improvement ordinances. Outreach to Visit Temecula, the Old Town Temecula Association (OTTA) and the Temecula Chamber of Commerce occurred in January 2022. The Planning Commission will consider the item in February 2022. City Council consideration is expected in the first half of 2022. (JONES)

HOUSING
Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City is processing a Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building

and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. The developer held a virtual community workshop on July 28, 2020. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on October 7, 2020. An amendment to the Loan Agreement was approved at the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March, 2021.

The applicant has submitted Building Permits and Grading Permits. CHW was awarded tax credits in June, 2021. The project is ready to issue Building Permits as of January 1, 2022. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. The developer is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior to construction. The City and developer will collaborate with the County of Riverside and the State Department of Housing and Community Development for additional funding opportunities through the Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March, 2021. (WATSON)
Housing Element Update (LR18-1620): The City is working with De Novo Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA process, community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tem Edwards and Council Member Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo, will serve as advisory bodies.

Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029.

The Final RHNA allocation was issued in September 2020. Staff is working with the consultant to update data and write draft chapters. A Housing Workshop was held on August 17, 2021, with approximately 12 attendees. The item was recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission at the September 15, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. The Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) and California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection have signed -off on the Housing Element. The item was approved by the City Council on October 12, 2021. Staff is waiting for a response from the California Department of Housing and Community Development. Staff will be returning to the City Council on February 8, 2022. (RABIDOU, PETERS)

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP): Pre -applications are open for the City of Temecula Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP). This program will provide rental and mortgage assistance to those eligible recipients who were negatively impacted by COVID-19. Checks are being issued for eligible recipients. Over $70,000 in funds have been distributed. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Five Year Consolidated Plan: The City is kicking -off an update to the CDBG Consolidated Plan.

Workshops were held on October 27, 2021. Citizens and other stakeholders attended the meeting and provided feedback. The survey period concluded in late January 2022. Additional information will be available at TemeculaCA.gov/CDBG. (RABIDOU, WATSON)

BUILDING & SAFETY
Building and Safety statistics for January 2022 are highlighted in the following table.

Building & Safety Statistics I January 2D22
Permits
426
New Single Family Units
20 New Commercial Building
D
Photovoltaic
166
Tenant Improvements
6 Non Construction C of 0
38 Number of Active Plan Checks
1D25
Number of New Plan Checks
144
Number of Finaled Permits
197
Inspections
2590
Inspections Per Day
129.5
Inspections Per Person Per Day

32.38 Stops Per Month
774
Visitors to Counter
937
New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check
• Truax Hotel (161,586 SF)
• Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 SF)
• Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 SF each) • Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) • Hotel (38,202 SF) on Jefferson and Winchester
• Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 SF)
• New Industrial Building (32,792 SF)
• New Margarita Recreation Center (8,161 SF)
Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy
• Identity Intelligence Group, 43406 Business Park Dr. (3,257 SF) • HQE Systems, 27419 Via Industria (5,160 sf)
• Cherished Child, 41743 Enterprise Cir North (1,910 SF) Tenant Improvement
• Chick-fil-A, 31285 40531 Margarita Rd (4,583 SF)
• Meadows Dental Group, 31843 Rancho California Rd, Suite 300(2,254 SF) • D&I Advisor, 41823 Enterprise Cir North (1,287 SF)

CODE ENFORCEMENT
During the month January, Code Enforcement responded to 113 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 131 code cases, conducted 180 regular inspections and 912 weed abatement inspections, and forwarded 39 referrals.

Type of Code Case
January
Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle
1 Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance /Infestation/ Mold
2 Business or Horne Occupation w/o license/CUP
27 Trash and Debris Dumping
Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard
5 Green Pool / Vector Control / Stagnant Water
Graffiti
17 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control
Trailer/RV Stored/Boat/Parking
7 Construction w/o Pe rm it/Bu i I d i ng Code
Public ROW / Trash Cans
Zoning/signs
;F7Encroach
Public Safety & Health
Total Number of Cages
Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties.

Foreclosu re Tracking January2822
Residential - Default 15
Residential - Foreclosure 19
Residential - EEO 12
Total - Residential
Cormercial- Default
Commercial - Foreclosure 0
Commercial
Total - Commercial 3
ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report

PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA22-0001 31950 Pauba Rd 955-020-019 Scott Cooper 01/03/2022 Deanna Elliano Linfield Christian PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592
School
Case Title / Description: Linfield Christian School Gatehouse MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) for the construction of an approximately 352 square foot security gatehouse including a barrier gate for Linfield Christian School located at 31950 Pauba Road
PA22-0015 40900 Winchester Rd 910-420-010 Scott Cooper 01/05/2022 Caitlin Miner Macy Calif PL Temporary Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Promenade Temecula COVID-19 Testing TUP: A Temporary Use Permit for walk-up COVID-19 Testing site at the Temecula Promenade until August 31, 2022.

PA22-0022 921-710-014 Scott Cooper 01/06/2022
Matthew Smith SBS REALTY PL Modifications Out
CA
INC
Case Title / Description: Business Park Dr. Fencing MOD: A Modification to install 8' high fencing on the rear of the property, and three (3) 8' high gates that will remain open during normal business hours located at 43189 and 43223 Business Park Drive
PA22-0035 922-072-005 Scott Cooper 01/07/2022
Steve Kim Steve Y. Kim PL Development Plan Review
CA
Living Trust Plan
Case Title / Description: Temecula Resort & Spa DP: A Development Plan for an approximately 474,137 square foot, seven (7) story, 90-foot high full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden located on the east side of Front Street between 1 st Street and 2nd Street.

PA22-0037 922-072-005 Scott Cooper 01/10/2022
Steve Kim Steve Y. Kim PL Maps Plan Review
CA
Living Trust
Case Title / Description: Temecula Resort & Spa TPM: A Tentative Parcel Map to combine ten (10) existing lots into a single lot located on the east side of Front Street between 1 st Street and 2nd Street.

PA22-0040 910-272-014 Scott Cooper 01/10/2022
Adam Covington Greystar Hoff Investments PL Minor Out
CA
Exception
Case Title / Description: Jefferson/Buecking Apartments ME: A Minor Exception for the Jefferson/Buecking Apartments project (PA21-1454) for a 3% reduction in required parking spaces from a total of 455 required spaces to 441 required spaces. The project is located approximately 50 feet southwest of Mercedes Street on the south side of 4th Street.

Page 1 of 4 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant
Company Owner Plan Type
Status
PA22-0047 31670 Rancho California Rd 953-090-028 Eric Jones 01/12/2022 Kal Farah
Kevin Purvis PL Maps
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Rancho-12 Tentative Tract Map: A Tentative Tract Map for a 12 lot single-family development located at 31670 Rancho California Road.

PA22-0067 28165 Jefferson Ave 921-060-016 Jaime Cardenas 01/18/2022 Jing Liu
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Tang Yun Asian Spa MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit renewal for Tang Yun Asian Spa located at 28165 Jefferson Avenue, Suite C.

PA22-0068 27489 Jefferson Ave 909-240-019 Jaime Cardenas 01/18/2022 Fiona Gao
Hilbert Group PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Emerald One Spa MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Emerald One Spa located at 27489 Jefferson Avenue.

PA22-0078 42200 Moraga Rd 921-310-014 Jaime Cardenas 01/19/2022 Kasey Little
PL Zoning or
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: Sage Canyon Apartments ZL: a Zoning Verification Letter for Sage Canyon Apartments located at42200 Moraga Road (APN 921-310-014).

PA22-0086 28441 Rancho California Rd 921-281-012 Jaime Cardenas 01/19/2022 Lee Padden
PL Zoning or
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: APN 921-281-012 ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property with associated Assessor's Parcel Number 921-281-012.

PA22-0091 27711 Diaz Rd 921-030-002 Eric Jones 01/21/2022 Niraj Patel
Scott Murray PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: Distribution Center Parking Lot Mod: A Modification application to allow for the construction of an additional parking lot on an improved parcel. The project is located at 27711 Diaz Road.

PA22-0096 32441 Toyon Rd 964-640-001 Scott Cooper 01/24/2022 Dena Upp
escrow acct WOODSIDE PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
5074 authorized HOMES OF
user SOUTHERN
CALIF
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA18A MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Home Product Review (PA20-1321) for the addition of an extended deck and super California room options for Plan 3 and removing a rear window for Plan 4 for PA18A of Sommers Bend

Page 2 of 4 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA22-0105 31700 Temecula Pky 959-080-026 Scott Cooper 01/26/2022 Steve Wilson HMC Architects TEMECULA PL General Plan Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592
VALLEY Amendment

HOSPITAL INC
Case Title / Description: TVH PDO Amendment: An amendment to the Temecula Hospital Planned Development Overlay to add development standards specific to the TVH medical campus.

PA22-0123 41669 Winchester Rd , 102 909-282-014 Jaime Cardenas 01/28/2022 YueLong Tan PL Massage Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Relax Zone Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit (change of owner) for Relax Zone Massage located at 41669 Winchester Road, Suite 102.

PA22-0134 40212 Winchester Rd 920-100-048 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2022 Brendan Yekta Inv. Group PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Armbruster
Case Title / Description: 40212 Winchester Arco MOD: a modification application to remove and replace the existing gas price lettering with LED lights for the existing Arco gas station monument sign located at 40212 Winchester Road.

PA22-0135 27691 Ynez Rd 921-270-048 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2022 Brendan SHAATH & PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Armbruster OUDAH

ENTERPRISES
INC
Case Title / Description: 27691 Ynez Arco MOD: a modification application to remove and replace the existing gas price lettering with LED lights for the existing Arco gas station monument sign located at 27691 Ynez Road.

PA22-0136 41555 Winchester Rd 909-281-017 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2022 Brendan Tesoro PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Armbruster
Case Title / Description: 41555 Winchester Road Arco MOD: a modification application to remove and replace the existing gas price lettering with LED lights for the existing Arco gas station monument sign located at 41555 Winchester Road.

PA22-0140 42780 North Star Ct 944-252-019 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2022 Michael PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
McManus
Case Title / Description: Covarrubias Addition MOD: a modification application for a proposed 566 square foot addition at the front of the home and a 66 square foot addition at the second level of the existing single-family home located at 42780 North Star Court.

PA22-0146 29775 Santiago Rd 922-130-019 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2022 Sarah Zughayer RANCHO PL Wireless Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
BAPTIST Antenna Facility
CHURCH
Case Title / Description: 29775 Santiago Verizon WTF: a Wireless Telecommunication Facility (Planning Review Only) application to remove and replace antennas, radio units, and ancillary equipment for the Verizon telecommunication facility located at 29775 Santiago Road.

Page 3 of 4 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner Plan Type
Status
PREAPP22-0 27406 Senna Ct 920-131-016 Scott Cooper 01/12/2022 Walt Eden Edenco
PL
Plan Review
044 Temecula, CA 92591
Construction
Pre -Application
Management
Case Title / Description: 27406 Senna Court Duplex Pre-App: A Pre -Application for the construction of a duplex and subdividing an existing single family lot into two (2) separate lots pursuant to SB9 located at 27406 Senna Court.

PREAPP22-0 42146 6Th St 922-053-037 Jaime Cardenas 01/12/2022 01/31/2022 Ryan Oldham
S&L Hasan, Inc. PL
Completed
045 Temecula, CA 92590
Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: Temecula Old Town Town Homes Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review a 15-unit, three -story town house residential project generally located on the southeast corner of 6th Street and Felix Valdez Avenue.

PREAPP22-0 41915 4Th St 922-033-017 Eric Jones 01/12/2022 Jessica Steiner
PL
Plan Review
048 Temecula, CA 92590
Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: 41915 4th Street Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review a four-story hotel with roof patio and subterranean parking. The project is generally located at 41915 4th Street.

PREAPP22-0 80134 Winchester Rd 920-110-005 Scott Cooper 01/13/2022 Corey File Willis
PL
Plan Review
050 Temecula, CA 92591
Development
Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: Sage Temecula Assisted Living Pre-App: A Pre -Application for a assisted living and memory care facility located at 80134 Winchester Road.

PREAPP22-0 32099 De Portola Rd 959-390-002 Jaime Cardenas 01/20/2022 Justin Garcia
City of Temecula PL
Plan Review
089 Temecula, CA 92592
Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: Dish Wireless at Paloma Del Sol Park Pre-App: a pre -application for a proposed modification consisting of new wireless antenna equipment for Dish Wireless on the property located at 32099 De Portola Road.

PREAPP22-0 960-010-032 Jaime Cardenas 01/24/2022
John DeGunya

REDHAWK PL
Plan Review
094 CA
TOWNE Pre -Application

CENTERII
Case Title / Description: WalMart Fuel Preapp: a second pre -application review for the construction of an eight -stack fuel station with a 440 square -foot building on the vacant parcel located on the southwest portion of Temecula Parkway and Apis Road (APN 960-010-032).

PREAPP22-0 909-310-002 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2022 Daniel Lee PL Plan Review 138 CA Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: Winchester & Diaz Industrial Buildings Pre-app: a pre -application for a proposed 27,000 square -foot and a 42,000 square -foot concrete tilt -up industrial building about 250 feet west of Diaz and Winchester Road (APN 909-310-002, -003, -004, -005).

Page 4 of 4 ends

Item No. 21

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: John Crater, Division Chief
DATE: February 22, 2022
SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report
PREPARED BY:

RECOMMENDATION:

Report
Wendy Miller, Management Analyst
That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly

City of Temecula Fire Department
Temecula Fire Department Service Calls
January 2022
Incident Type
Commercial Fire
False Alarms
Haz Mat
Medical
� 1989
Multi -Faro
o� 0 WW OV)
Other Fire
Other Misc
Public Assist
Residential Fire
Rescue
Ringing Alarm
Standby
Traffic Collision
Wildland/Vehicle Fire
0 73
1 735
1 5
10 41
6 3
4 7
47 3
Total 936
t°
a ` - � • r r ♦ - :. M a ser�.a Nab
�. w <'i..nr1 �' � • • l � �� ,M']ri:k try '.:
! Relion l2�! •� Anl u..w•A
',* .�wi,i►8.. lr , • a, .y•• .,.- •,• 94. •!r PA v6A VALLEY as
.�
q
All
'11R . 1.ANCAIA5IN6MIORYJ
J

City of Temecula Fire Department
Temecula Fire Department
Plan Review and Inspections
January 2022
Plan Review and Inspections January Year to Date
Plan Review 335 335
1959 Construction Inspections 274 274
Annual Inspections 294 294
Counter/Public Inquiries 32 32

City of Temecula oeFire� Department
Temecula Fire
W;�
Spark of Love Toy Drive
Received 469 applications
La
Filled 717 toy requests
Big Thank You to the community,
we collected 5,995 toys

Item No. 22

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager / City Council
FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police
DATE: February 22, 2022
SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (January 2022) PREPARED BY: Joseph Greco, Sergeant
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file
The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for January 2022.

PATROL SERVICES
Overall calls for police service 6,304
"Priority One" calls for service 62
Average response time for "Priority One" calls 6.16

VOLUNTEERS
Chaplain 34
Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 503
Reserve officer hours (patrol) 56
Explorer 31
Station/Administration 75
Total Volunteer hours 623

OLD TOWN STOREFRONT
Total customers served
193
Fingerprints/Live Scans
53 Police reports filed
9 Citations signed off
16 Total receipts
$2,765

CRIME PREVENTION
Crime prevention/Neighborhood watch meetings
0 Safety presentations/Training
0 Special events
0 Residential/Business security surveys conducted
0 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0 Station Tours
1 Planning Review Projects
4 Temp Outdoor Use Permits
2 SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM)
On sight felony arrests 3
On sight misdemeanor arrests 17
Felony arrest warrants served 1
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 41
Area Checks 109
Camp Checks 55
Pedestrian Checks 35
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks 4
Outreach attempts / Success 12/5
SPECIAL TEAMS (Special Enforcement Team)
On sight felony arrests
8 On sight misdemeanor arrests
9 Felony arrest warrants served
6 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
17 Follow-up investigations / search warrants
7 Parole/Probation Searches
0 Pedestrian Checks
18 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks
76 Marijuana Dispensary Checks
0 SPECIAL TEAMS (Metro District Team)
On sight felony arrests
9 On sight misdemeanor arrests
14 Felony arrest warrants served
6 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
25 Bar/Business checks
345
D.U.I. Arrests
17 Traffic/Parking citations
92 TRAFFIC
Citations issued for hazardous violations
837
Non -hazardous citations
155
Parking citations
89 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 93 Seatbelts
31 Cell Phone Cites
110
Injury collisions
27 D.U.I. Arrests
37 Grant funded D.U.I. Traffic safety checkpoints / saturation enforcement 0 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket / traffic enforcement 0 INVESTIGATIONS
Beginning Caseload
117
Total Cases Assigned
40 Total Cases Closed
36 Search Warrants prepared/served
26 Arrests
1 Out of Custody Filings
6 1' ; i7ulil12I:�7ilu/:vilil m.30-1
Calls for service
171
Felony arrest/filings
1 Misdemeanor arrest/filings
11 Traffic Citations
15 Total customers served
446
Fingerprints/Live Scans
205
Total receipts
$6,931

SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS
Felony arrests 1
Misdemeanor arrests 3
Reports 29
Citations 35
Meetings/Presentations 180

Incident summaries:

Calls for Service: Officers responded to 6,304 calls for service in January 2022. Below is a snapshot of those calls. This is not a comprehensive list. Please be mindful these calls can range from several minutes to several hours, to investigate at the patrol level. Many of these investigations are forwarded to the Detective Bureau for even further investigation and follow-up.

Call Type
Number
of Calls
Call Type
Number of
Calls
Arson
1 Hazard
6 Assault with a Deadly Weapon
4 Homeless Outreach
12 Battery (Fights)
52 Illegal Dumping
1 Burglary -Commercial
13 Indecent Exposure
3 Burglary -Residential
3 Juvenile -Incorrigible
11 Burglary -Vehicle
49 Juvenile -Run Away
31 Child Abuse
2 Juvenile -Located
3 Domestic Violence Abuse
18 Juvenile -Medical Aid
8 Fraud
33 K9 Uses
59 Homicide
1 Keep the Peace
34 Rape
3 Mail Theft
13 Robbery
7 Marijuana Cultivation
Theft- Petty (Under $950)
81 Mentally Disturbed Person (5150)
74 Theft -Grand (over $950)
60 Missing Adult or Child
11 Narcotics Violations
775
Person Down
16 Alarm -Audible
386
Prowler
2 Alarm -Robbery
Receiving Stolen Property
1 Alarm -Silent
9 Restraining Order Violation
11 Animal Cruelty
7 Sex Offender Registrants
Annoying Phone Calls
23 Sexual Battery
1 Area Checks
639
Shooting at a Dwelling
11 Assist Other Department
138
Stolen Vehicle
33 Brandishing a Firearm
2 Stolen Vehicle Recovery
11 Check the Welfare
94 Suicide threat
34 Child Stealing
25 Suspicious Person
184
Criminal Threats
3 Suspicious Vehicle
62 Disoriented Subject
6 Trespassing
85 Disturbing the Peace
315
Unattended Death
8 Drunk in Public
35 Vandalism
47 Extra Patrol Requests
18 Vehicle Embezzlement
3 Fireworks
13 Vicious Dog
4 Follow -Up Investigations/Patrol
290
Warrant Service
166
911 Calls
679

Item No. 23

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 22, 2022
SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at:
hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIRCULATION PROJECTS
Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Low -Flow Crossing, PW19-15 Description: Preliminary design of the Extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz Road, including a new low -flow crossing of Murrieta Creek.

Cost: $2,387,000
Status: In design until March 2022. Hydraulic, geotechnical, traffic and biological reports are complete. Preliminary design is under review.

Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25
Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases.

Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road.

Cost: $11,457,436
Status: Phase 1 design and Phase 1 & 2 environmental studies November 2019 — October 2022. Current activities include consultant preparation of 90% PS&E, public circulation of environmental document, and coordination with utility companies.

French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two-lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215.

Cost: $137,356,246
Status: Currently in design. Environmental revalidation is complete. Right of way acquisition process is well underway.
1 City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02
Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp.

Cost: $8,382,225
Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — September 2022. Current activities include City revision of 95% Roadway and Structures PSE, Storm Water Data Report, Drainage Report, and Permit Engineering Evaluation Report and continued coordination with Caltrans on development of the Draft Environmental Document.

Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South.

Cost: $52,025,657
Status: Per a 3-year Landscape Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans, the City will maintain the interchange site from June 30, 2020 through June 30, 2023. The City is working with Caltrans on the relinquishment of the interchange right-of-way to the State inventory.

Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05
Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road.

Cost: $14,307,394
Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. RCA provided comments to the JPR application on 7/30/2020. NEPA approval is anticipated in Q1 of 2022, Caltrans review time has been longer than anticipated. Biological monitoring in Temecula Creek for potential mitigation site is complete as of July 2021. CEQA is pending results of Temecula Creek monitoring and review by RCA. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years. Caltrans HBP Program management has proposed reducing the curb to curb width of the bridge that is considered "participating" for grant funding purposes. Staff will address this with Caltrans HBP Program as the bridge width is the same as original approved grant application.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11
Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights, and installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue.

Cost: $1,340,400
Status: Design is at 60%.

Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Rancho California Road at Tee Drive.

Cost: $346,646.50
Status: Project is currently in design.

Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access to the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane.

Cost: $1,347,674
Status: City Council awarded the construction contract at the meeting on May 25, 2021. Construction started June 21, 2021. Construction completion is anticipated in March of 2022. 3 City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022

INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Bike and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting
Description: Project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road.

Cost: $400,000
Status: Project is currently in design.

Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07
Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment.

Cost: $5,000,000
Status: Phase 1 design. Reviewed 100% plans.

Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe.

This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, irrigation, and transportation art between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange.

Cost: $3,533,483
Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — June 2022. Environmental revalidation completed October 2020. Current activities include 90% design plans, design of new power and irrigation water service, and Design Engineering Evaluation Report.
4 City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21
Description: Demolition and Reconstruction of New Margarita Recreation Center Building and Pool Cost: $10,656,507.91
Status: RFP responses were received on August 27, 2020. The project was re -advertised on November 25, 2020 to account for increased project budget and proposals were received on December 23, 2020. The Design - Build Contract was awarded at the March 9, 2021 City Council Meeting to De La Secura Builders, Inc., for a Guaranteed Maximum Price of $8,680,459.00. Design phase is well underway. The second building plan review was completed on January 25, 2022 and the Design Builder is working to address comments.

The existing MRC building was vacated by City Staff and all salvageable equipment removed on January 28, 2022. The Fire Department was scheduled to use the building for training the week of February 7, 2022. The demolition of the existing MRC building is scheduled to start on February 14, 2022. It is anticipated building construction will be complete in January 2023 with a grand opening in Spring 2023.

Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13 Description: The project includes the enhancement and renovation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. Work includes new exterior siding, painting, replacement of perimeter soffits, fascia boards, eaves, and select doors & windows.

Cost: $1,000,000
Status: In design. Reviewed 90% plans.

Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail.

Cost: $6,288,595
Status: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. The Notice to Proceed for construction was issued to the contractor with a work start date of April 19, 2021. Groundbreaking event occurred on May 4, 2021. Completion is anticipated in April of 2022.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing, PW19-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the undercrossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location.

Cost: $2,716,764
Status: The project is in design. 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PSE) expected in April 2022.

Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road.

Cost: $198,920
Status: Project is currently in design.

Sidewalks — DLR Drive, PW19-18
Description: New sidewalks on the north and west side of DLR Drive.

Cost: $442,077
Status: Project is currently in design. Council to authorize solicitation of bids at the March 8, 2022 meeting.

Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road.

Cost: $467,403
Status: Project is currently in design.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02
Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side Fifth Street, between Front Street and Murrieta Creek.

Improvements include grind/overlay of entire street, tree grates, bollards, streetlights.

Cost: $159,267.30
Status: Construction is complete.

Citywide — Slurry Seal, PW21-01
Description: Construction involves roadway preparation by removal of existing striping and pavement markings, cleaning the roadway surface and sealing cracks. This is followed by application of slurry seal and subsequent restoration of striping and pavement markings. The project consists of slurry sealing over 7 million square feet of residential roadway throughout Temecula
Cost: $1,546,980.04
Status: Project is complete.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022

PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site.

Cost: $1,280,284
Status: The environmental document, CEQA IS/MND, was approved at the July 27, 2021 Council Meeting. Project was advertised for bids between September 9, 2021 and October 7, 2021. Bids were opened on 10/07/2021. Construction contract was awarded at the 10/26/2021 City Council meeting. Construction is underway with anticipated completion by March 15, 2022.

Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Butterfield Stage Park and Vail Ranch Park.

Cost: $1,127,800
Status: Project is currently in design.

Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing
Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks.

Cost: $800,000
Status: An RFP is being prepared for the design, purchase & installation for three playground project sites — Redhawk Community Park, Long Canyon Creek Park & Temecula Creek Park.

Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of a new restroom building, including additional stalls and urinals, a large snack bar and a dedicated storage case.

Cost: $1,120,000
Status: Project is being advertised for construction bids. Bid opening is scheduled for March 3, 2022. Construction is anticipated in Spring 2022.
8 City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022

LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS
American Tire Depot
Description: A 7,303 square foot building to be used for tire retail and repair, as well as minor auto repair services, located at the southwest corner of Ynez Road and DLR Drive.

Status: Parking lot has been paved.

Arrive @ Rancho Highlands
Description: A 270-unit multi -family community built on 12.32 acres that includes 55 affordable units. The project is located adjacent to the Temecula Duck Pond approximately 775 feet southeast of Rancho California Road on the north side of Ynez Road.

Status: Grading and onsite storm drain permits were issued in October 2021. Grading and onsite storm drain construction has commenced. Overflow parking lot has been paved.

Heirloom Farms
Description: A Development Plan for a 321-unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road.

Includes the installation of a new Traffic Signal at the intersection of Ynez Rod and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive
Status: Rough grading permit has been issued in July 2021, the offsite and private onsite street and storm drain improvements permits were issued in October 2021 and the traffic signal permit was issued in September 2021. Grading, street, and storm drain improvements and the traffic signal installation has commenced.

Precise Grading plans are currently being reviewed.

Las Haciendas Apartments
Description: A Development Plan to construct a 77-unit affordable housing project located at 28715 Las Haciendas Street in Uptown Temecula
Status: Precise grading permit was issued in December 2021. Grading has commenced in January 2022 and is ongoing.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 22, 2022
Lexus Dealership
Description: 42,200 square foot Lexus dealership that includes sales, service, and parts storage located at 42081 DLR Drive.

Status: The project is near completion pending slurry and striping of parking lot.

Mountain View
Description: Thirteen industrial buildings on Avenida Alvarado Status: Eight precise grading permits have been issued and construction has commenced. Improvements on Avenida Alvarado, along with street light installations is in process.

Solana Assisted Living
Description: A 90,000 square foot, two-story, Senior Assisted Living Facility located on the southeast corner of the Margarita Road and Solana Way.

Status: A rough grading permit was issued in January 2022. Grading began on February 7, 2022. Street improvements and precise grading plans have been submitted for review.

Sommers Bend
Description: Land Development has provided oversight of the following submittals for plan check and inspections: final maps, Community Sports Park and recreation lots, precise grading; street and storm drain improvements; traffic signals; street lighting; and signing & striping.

Status: The mass grading permit was issued in September 2018. Sommers Bend has been paved with streetlights installed. The community sports park, Ranch at Sommers Bend, construction is complete and has been accepted at the February 8, 2022 Council Meeting with its Ribbon Cutting ceremony scheduled for February 12, 2022. The Sommers Bend recreation center construction is complete. Bond release for Long Valley Wash in process. Installation of streets, storm drains and streetlights on east end of project is in process.

Grading has been completed in the Density Core, currently installing sewer. Installation of Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements northwest end of project is in process. 10 REQUESTS TO SPEAK

AND ELECTRONIC

COMMENTS SUBMITTED

FOR THE RECORD

pF �f l: yF'f
Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item:4
Agenda Item No. _ For

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Agendized Item: ❑
AgainstEl
Date: I a I �0��
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. II

5q N Aq UrAP41 l ZZ�
Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

N R1
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

/j REQUEST TO SPEAK
o1j CITY OF TEMECULA
1989
Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item:fb Agendized Item: ❑ Agenda Item No.

For El AgainstEl
Date: 2,Z2 Z bZ 2-
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. `
Name: `) U r� of 600\-q7- i ,� Lf Q? Phone Number: _(�
Address: \ ��e w�c CA, ` 7-joi-Z
Email address:

If you are representipg an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
1989
Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agendized Item: ❑
Agenda Item No.

For El Against ❑
Date: I -`_ I 2-` ,
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: N ��e� �C`C��L�� hone Number(_��
Address: g251
Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK
- CITY OF TEMECULA
ivxv
Date:

Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agendized Item: 1-1 Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: I" 1-0 / C-16%yl A5��Z� 0 Dk-9ACS Phone Number:

Address
Email address:

If you are representing an organization or gro p, please give t name:

A 10, t A ,;nA_ 1A �f _ Ifs 1n -� . _- -
v
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
AW
Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item:F] Agendized Item: El Agenda Item No.

For Against El
Date: O ? A�
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
— Name: Qr— \t\ b i Q Phone Number:rA

Address: e� U
Email address: il'!
are representing �n��ganizati or group, 1as�e give name:
►vx,n.P a, e� 'Vrx � � �
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

Public Comment:

Agenda Item No.

Non-Agendized Item:

For ❑

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Agendized Item: 1-1
Against 1-1
Date: )- r r d—�—
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. 1 //11 , ( -�

Email address: N��
you are representing an organization or group, please givg the name:
�vec�0\ DGk 150
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agendized Item:
e
IG
6 VIM
Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speak r is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. � � n `�
Name: \ Phone Number:

C
Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

From: Randi Johl
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:53 PM
To: 'Temecula Citizen'
Subject: RE: Non -Agenda 22 FEB 2022: Term Limits, A Proposal Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.

If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl temeculaca.cioov
41000 Main St. Temecula. CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

From: Temecula Citizen
Subject: Non -Agenda 22 FEB 2022: Term Limits, A Proposal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello City Council,
I'd like to add some comments to the record regarding term limits.

Term limits are great. Every elected office should have them. The citizens of Temecula should get to vote on this issue.

But it should be framed in the correct way.

There's a sense of pride in serving the community that you actually reside in.

A simple proposal --

Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item:

Agenda Item No. For El

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Agendized Item: 0
Against ❑
Date:

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: �It�V I rUl Phone Number:
�/
Address: �� •��IG'� IU�
Email address: (,
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item:

Agenda Item No. � I For ❑

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Agendized Item: El
Against
Date:

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that ite Once th s Baker, is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: / Phone Number:

Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Date: 2. Z.Z— ZDZ.2..

Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agendized Item: 19
Agenda Item No. L ` _ For �6 Against
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: &Am Lz�xll,4 1 % Phone Number:

Address: �.�; o. �� IZ-S(m,
Email address: L-
you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Date: ;? I 9d I ga
Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agendized Item:

Agenda Item No. For �/ Against 171
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: H ��j(' �lS►�LE►2� S Phone Number:
r
Address:

-T-erv,.YGAA'
A , (A q0l '� 0
Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Date:

Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agendized Item: ❑
'F4, tz'z
Agenda Item No. — For Against 1-1Request to Speak forms for Public ments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. �.1 '�9-
Name: I v,l�[' I��"'t� ``L, Phone Number:

Address
Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give they name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meetirig becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item:

Agenda Item No. I I For

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Agendized Item: xf
Against
Date: 'R�a a"�
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: 1c'27 113 le'L Phone Number:

Address: ,� , Tznnec.vlG
Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
fi�vMeGvIa 1fn 1Ie� Il h� PocV_Qz iaJSocic *oyr —11/11-4 A Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Date: `2
Z.2
Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agendized Item:

Agenda Item No. _ / � For Ea--'� Against ❑
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. (NarName: J ka- ✓ -,V _ /! ? Uyat s Phone Number:

SIF-
Address: C11 ---
Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Date: 0 Z Z Z- 7 o % L
Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agendized Item: n
Agenda Item No. J For AgainstEl
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: A lac W oww) Phone Number:

Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

` pt I fFr

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Date:

Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item:

Agendized Item: M
Agenda Item No. j For ® Against ❑
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: �r1rS
Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Phone Number: _ `�
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item:

Agenda Item No. Aq For

REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
Agendized Item:

Against ❑
Date: 2-- Z 2-- Z Z
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. I� �

Address: �
Email address: 6-1
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 5:36 PM
To:

Subject: RE: 2/22/2022 City Council Meeting Item #12 (Consent Calendar) Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.

If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.iohl(@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

On Feb 21, 2022, at 20:10, Matthew Edgeworth <
wrote:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Mayor Rahn,
I hope this email finds you well!
I would like to comment on Item #12 (Establish All -Way Stop Control at the Intersection of Wold Creek Drive South and Teton Trail/Fireside Drive) on tomorrow's City Council Agenda. I would like to first thank the Traffic/Engineering staff for conducting an all -way stop evaluation at this location. Please consider having staff evaluate the feasibility of striping bike lanes along Wolf Creek Drive. There appears to be adequate width to stripe a minimum 5-foot bike lane in each direction without modifying the existing striping.

Reducing travel lane widths have also been shown to have the potential to reduce travel speeds. Please consider having staff evaluate the feasibility of adding a Class II bike lane facility on Wolf Creek Drive with tonight's action.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration and also staffs hard work and time! Best regards,
Matthew

From: Randi Johl
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:53 PM
To: 'Landon Lassig'
Subject: RE: skatepark comment
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Landon Lassig
Subject: skatepark comment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I cant attend the city council meeting on tuesday the 22nd but I'd to make a comment on this decision about demolishing & rebuilding tsp . This skatepark is legendary and even though some of the features are weird or outdated, it is unique and that it what makes it so good. redoing this skatepark would ruin all the fun of having a unique skatepark like this and a new skatepark could just be built somewhere else. We need to keep this park as it is and many people agree with me
Sent from my iPhone

From: Council Comments
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 8:42 AM
To: 'Alison Llamas'
Subject: RE: Budget and renovation approval for the Skate Park and Hockey Rink Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.

If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl(&temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

From: Alison Llamas
Subject: Budget and renovation approval for the Skate Park and Hockey Rink CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,my name is Alison Llamas and I would like to bring something to your attention . I recently started going to the Ronald Reagan Sports Park after school and I have met and made so many new friends. I also noticed that the Hockey Rink and Skate Park could use a renovation. I really think it would make such a big impact on the community,students,and families and we would greatly appreciate it. I truly believe this renovation and budget approval can change people's Iives.So many kids my age and younger would look forward to using the facility's more then they already do . This can also encourage other people to try out a new hobby and stay away from negative influences . I know from experience that its been really hard for people to reconnect with each other since the Covid lockdown and this can help reassure and inspire those who have had trouble socializing with others and make sure that they feel welcome. I know that the Budget and Renovation approval will get an enthusiastic and cheerful response from the community that the Temecula City Council had built and developed over the years .

From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 11:56 AM
To: 'Andrew Guevara'
Subject: RE: Public Comment for Temecula City Council Meeting for February 22nd, 2022.

Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Andrew Guevara ; Council Comments
Subject: Public Comment for Temecula City Council Meeting for February 22nd, 2022.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Temecula city,
I do not support the remodel of TSP, as a beginner at skateboarding I have learned a lot of in this park the skate bowl and street skate section is awesome and everyone has enough space to ride. I would support additional skateparks in our area giving us variety and add more things like ledges and grind rails or steps. I love this park because it is good for beginners like me and good for more advanced skaters. If you were to add anything to TSP I would love more quarter pipes or a mini ramp, with all do respect Andrew.

Thanks,
Andrew Guevara
French Valley Elementary (4th grade)

From: Council Comments
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 8:42 AM
To: 'Will Ek'
Subject: RE: Council Comment!!!!!
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Will Ek
Subject: Council CommentHH!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Wassuppp! Im a 13 year old kid lets get a better skatepark up in here. Im looking for a great bowl with steeper quarters and better flyout!! Also, lets see if we could maybe get that block removed above the quarterpipe at the corner of the park. I think everyone would enjoy it more if we replaced it with coping!!!! Lets GET ITH! Sent from my iPhone

From:

Council Comments
Sent:

Tuesday, February 22, 2022 8:43 AM
To:
'Alexia Medina'
Subject:

RE: Support for Renovating the ronald Reagan skatepark
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.

If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i johl a)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

From: Alexia Medina
Subject: Support for Renovating the ronald Reagan skatepark CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

All for renovating the ronald Reagan skate park and make the community a better place and make skaters proud and appreciated for the attention towards them.

From: Council Comments
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 4:28 PM
To: 'Ian Bailey'
Subject: RE: Plans for Temecula Skatepark. Public comment for board meeting set for 7pm on February 22nd 2022
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Ian Bailey
Subject: Plans for Temecula Skatepark. Public comment for board meeting set for 7pm on February 22nd 2022 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello my name is Ian Bailey. My family and I have been residents of the city of Temecula for over 10 years. I am an active sports enthusiast having been involved with everything from the local Rugby Club to being a part of Neighborhood Drop In our local action sports advocates.

First I would like to thank the City Of Temecula for their continued support of local organizations, groups and your continued betterment of our community. The actions of the City and this council to not only listen but act on community needs is recognized and appreciated.

Today I would personally like to express my appreciation the council for recognizing the need for more action sports facilities within the city.

This city is a wonderful place to raise a family. There are facilities and programs for young children all the way to our seniors (which my family and I have used numerous times). We have sports parks throughout Temecula as well as multiple smaller Parks and playgrounds for the citizens to enjoy.

That being said until recently, with the addition of the pump tracks, there was not adequate (modern) facilities for our action sports community. It has not gone unnoticed that Temecula has taken an active interest in this community as of late.

From: Joseph Komrosky <
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 4:10 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: These pictures are what I will use to speak to tonight for public comments at the City Hall with reference to the current skatepark at Ronald Reagan Sports Park Attachments: Temecula Skate Park 1.png; Temecula Skate Park 2.png; Small Skate Spot at Ronald Reagan Sports Park 3.png
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern,
I'm Joseph Komrosky from Neighborhood Drop In.

These pictures are what I will use to speak to tonight for public comments at the City Hall with reference to the current skatepark at Ronald Reagan Sports Park. I will ask that you post one at a time, when I speak in person at the mic.

Otherwise, I can bring a flash drive and download them myself. I just thought this would be easier.

Thanks!
All the best,
jasep1ti Komro-s-c y, Phi D.

Clay /Zdarw-n*offi/,- P�
rcc I

NEIGHBORHOOD

DROP - IN
"Skateboarding is more popular than many of the sports that are in the Summer Olympics." Tony Hawk

TEMECULA
Temecula Skate Park 42569 Margarita Rd.

Legend

42.991 541
10 91.4 0 45JU 91 4 1 eel
WGS-1984-Wets -Mercator-AuxHiary_Sphere
C Latitude Geographics Group Ltd
Is

1. 548 Notes
Skate Park Area 43 000 sqtt
I his map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate. current, or otherwise reliable,

THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION

.Am
' S
}
L
f f

42. 8 i 1 50 0'
s4 t
IP
f M V
�.

M 1
� • .� .q i

From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 6:39 PM
To: 'Thatcher Seal'
Subject: RE: Temecula Skatepark Future
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.

Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Thatcher Seal
Subject: Temecula Skatepark Future
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello city council members, my name is Thatcher Seal and I have been a skateboarder in this community for over 6 years. During that time I have been kicked out of countless areas around the city and mostly told one thing: "Isn't there a skatepark?" It is very difficult to get a non -skateboarder to understand why the skatepark is not built for skateboards, or at least not up to date with today's standard skatepark. There has been concern time and time again about this issue and the city built not one but TWO pump tracks and didn't think about maybe using some of that funding to update the current skatepark or find a new patch of land (there are too many to think of around Temecula) for a new, improved skatepark. While pump tracks are great, and they are very used, mainly bikers get use out of them. We only want a place to be able to do what we love every day, and even if the current skatepark was any better, it is still the only one in town, making it very crowded most of the time. Many parents bring their small children to the skatepark to ride their scooters, bikes, or skateboards. While I fully encourage getting the youth to ride, it is very difficult and sometimes dangerous to skate the park with it being so crowded and sometimes, people collide and get injured. With another park, more space would be made at both parks. I could go on about why a new park would be a good addition to Temecula, but I'm going to leave it here hoping you guys have lots of other skateboarders' comments to read. Thank you.

Sent from my iPhone

Temecula City CouncilFebruary 22, 2022

Temecula City Council
February 22, 2022