Agenda — Temecula City Council, July 14, 2026 (part 2 of 4)

REDHAWK PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY
INTERSECTION AT 45100 REDHAWK PARKWAY (APN:
962-040-012)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

A. On June 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application No. PA23-0251, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wedding/event center to be operated as part of an existing golf course. On August 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application PA23-0327, a Specific Plan Amendment for the Redhawk Specific Plan to provide a revision to uses associated with the golf course and add related standards for those uses. Both applications were submitted in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.

B. The project site is approximately 100 acres and generally located approximately 1,500 feet from the Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch Parkway Intersection.

C. The applications were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").

D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.

E. The City contracted with Kimley-Horn for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, Kimley-Horn and City staff concluded that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, but that mitigation measures could be implemented to reduce such impacts to a less than significant level. Based upon this determination, Kimley-Horn prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration ("Draft MND") in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

F. The City circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt the Draft MND, along with the MND and its Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day comment period between June 30, 2025 through July 30, 2025. A Notice of Intent was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of June 30, 2025 through July 30, 2025. The City published a Notice of Intent for the Draft MND in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, Chamber of Commerce, located at 26790 Ynez Court, Suite A, Temecula, CA 92591, Ronald Roberts Public Library, located at 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula, CA 92592, and on the City of Temecula website.

G. During the comment period, the City received three written comments on the Draft MND from various agencies, individuals, and organizations and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission, and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings.

H. The "Final Mitigated Negative Declaration" ("Final MND") consists of the Draft MND, response to comments, and all of its appendices and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The Final MND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies on September 9, 2025, which is at least 10 days prior to certification of the Final MND, in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.5(a).

I. On February 4, 2026, the Planning Commission, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final MND and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter.

J. Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to assure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by reference.

K. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2026-07 recommending that the City Council adopt the Final MND and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution Nos. 2026-08, and 2026-09, thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of a Specific Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit.

L. Prior to taking action at the noticed City Council public hearing held on July 14, 2026, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, as well as oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information to support a fair argument requiring additional environmental review or re -circulation of the Final MND under CEQA because no new significant N

environmental impacts were identified, nor was any substantial increase in the severity of any previously disclosed environmental impacts identified.

Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California does hereby find, determine and declare that:

A. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full.

B. Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Final MND and on the Project. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.

C. The City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final MND and all documents therein, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony.

D. The City Council has reviewed the Final MND and all comments received regarding the Final MND prior to and at the July 14, 2026 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final MND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment following imposition of the mitigation that has been proposed and is included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and (3) the Final MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council.

E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the Final MND, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.

F. The City Council hereby directs staff to file a Notice of Determination as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21152(a).

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of July, 2026.

Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan
Amendment

FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
SCH Number 2025061421
September 2025
Lead Agency.

City of Temecula
Community Development Department
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Eric Jones — Associate Planner 11
(951) 506-5115
Consultant:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
27290 Madison Avenue, Suite 300
Temecula, CA 92590
Kevin Thomas, CEP — Project Manager
(951) 543-9875
Kimley»#Horn

This page intentionally left blank.

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table of Contents
Section1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 Section 1.1 Project Summary......................................................................................................1 Section 1.2 CEQA Process Summary........................................................................................... 2 Section 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses to Comments..............................................................3 Comment Letter R1— Southern California Gas Company(SoCalGas).............................................. 5 Response to Comment Letter R1—Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas).................... 6 Comment Letter R2 — Riverside Transit Agency (RTA).................................................................... 7 Responses to Comment Letter R2 — Riverside Transit Agency(RTA)......................................... 8 Comment Letter R3 — Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District)... 9 Response to Comment Letter R3 — Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District(District)................................................................................................................... 10 List of Tables
Table 2.1: Comment Letters Received
Attachments
Attachment 1: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment 2: Public Draft IS/MND
3 City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page intentionally left blank.

City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Section 1.0 Introduction
Section 1.1 Project Summary
The IS/MIND is an informational document intended to inform the public and decision -makers about the environmental consequences of the amendments to the Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan. The Specific Plan is bounded by the Vail Ranch Specific Plan to the north, the Morgan Hill Planning Area to the east, the Wolf Creek Specific Plan to the west, and the Pechanga Reservation to the south. The Project proponent is seeking a Specific Plan Amendment to the Redhawk Specific Plan to add a new use and related standards for the new use. The proposed new use is a private event center to hold weddings, private parties, etc., within an existing pavilion. A Conditional Use Permit is also proposed to allow for a private event center to operate within an existing golf course, located at 45100 Redhawk Parkway, Temecula, CA 92592.

The Specific Plan area is an approximately 1,275-acre area comprising 21 planning areas. Existing general plan land uses within the Project site consist of low medium residential (LM), medium residential (M), public institutional facilities (PI), and open space (OS). The Specific Plan allows for residential, commercial, open space and recreation, golf course, circulation, and public facilities uses. Much of the Project site is developed with residential land uses, open space in the form of a golf course, and schools, along with accessory and ancillary uses. The Redhawk Golf Course is generally located in the center of the Specific Plan area.

The Redhawk Golf Course is an approximately 182.7-acre area of the Redhawk Specific Plan area (PA 36).

It is a prominent feature of the Specific Plan area and is located throughout the entirety of the Specific Plan area, generally centralized to all uses within the Specific Plan area. Redhawk Golf Course includes an 18-hole course, a driving range, putting greens, a pro shop, executive offices, a restaurant, a cart barn, and course maintenance facilities. The course is open seven days a week, and the hours of operation are 6:00 am to 9:00 pm with seasonal variations dependent on daylight hours. There are typically 20 employees on site. The Project would allow for additional uses at the Redhawk Golf Course Country Club and Outdoor Pavilion, herein referred to as the Pavilion, located at 45100 Redhawk Parkway. The Pavilion is located on a 100.9-acre parcel with Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 962-040-012. The Project proposes to expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course and no construction would be required. The Project would not increase the frequency at which events could occur at the Project site on a daily basis.

The Project focuses on an existing Pavilion at the Redhawk Golf Course, located adjacent to the pro shop.

The Pavilion is an existing covered structure totaling 3,200 square feet (SF) and has open walls. The Pavilion is bounded by the Redhawk Golf Course on the east and south and by residential developments in all directions. The Pavilion is designated as Open Space in the City's General Plan. Residential uses to the north are designated as Medium Residential while uses to the east, south, and west are designated Low Medium Residential.

City of Temecula 1

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Section 1.2 CEQA Process Summary
The Draft IS/MND describes the existing environmental resources on the Project site and in the vicinity of the Project site, analyzes potential impacts on those resources that would or could occur upon initiation of the Project, and identifies mitigation measures that could avoid or reduce the magnitude of those impacts determined to be significant. The potential environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft IS/MND concern several subject areas, including aesthetics, agriculture and forestry, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation, tribal cultural resources, utilities and service systems, and wildfire.

When the Draft IS/MND was completed, it and a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) were circulated for public review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15072 and 15105. The 30-day public review for the Draft IS/MND began on June 30, 2025, and ended on July 30, 2025. The NOI was also published in The Press -Enterprise and posted at the Project site. All comment letters received during the 30-day public review period previously mentioned are included in this Final IS/MND.

As set forth in more detail in the Responses to Comments, none of the Responses change the significance conclusions presented in the Draft IS/MND or alter the analysis presented for public review.

This Final IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code [PRC] 21000 et. seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations [CCR] 15000 et. seq.). Although not required by CEQA, the City of Temecula has evaluated the comments received on the Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Draft IS/MND. The Responses to Comments which are included in this document, together with the Draft IS/MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), comprise the Final IS/MND for use by the City of Temecula in its review and consideration of the Project.

As described below in Section 2.0, Comment Letters and Responses to Comments, none of the Responses change the significance conclusions presented in the Draft IS/MND or alter the analysis presented for public review.

City of Temecula 2

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Section 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses to Comments
Table 2-1 below provides a list of those parties that provided written comments on the Draft IS/MIND during the public review period. Each comment document has been assigned a letter as indicated in the table.

A copy of the written comments provided in this section have been annotated with the assigned letter along with a numberfor each comment. Each comment document is followed by a written response which corresponds to the comments provided.

Table 2.1: Comment Letters Received
Letter Date Received • .

Regional Agencies
R1
July 11, 2025
Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas)
R2
July 24, 2025
Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
R3
July 29, 2025
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) Individuals/Public/Local Residents
No Individuals/Public/Local Residents Comment Letters Received State Agencies
No State Agency Comment Letters Received
City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page intentionally left blank.

City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment Letter R1 — Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) From: Liao, William [email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 12:46 PM
To: Eric Jones ceric.janes@a te m ecu I a ca. gov>
Cc: SCG SE Region Redlands Utility Request

Subject: FW: Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit CAUTIDN: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links oropen attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Eric.

SoCalGas has several existing facilities within Redhawk grounds. Please help us ensure everyone's safety and require that 811/U5A be called in prior to any demolition / excavation activities so we can get out to Locate & Mark out our facilities.

R1A
If mad ificatic n to existing service or new service is needed, please have Redhawk or representative contact our Builder Services team at Builder Services I SoCalGas to submit an application.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Will Liao
Region Pldnning Supervisor
RedIan da H f $vutheast Region
Mobile: 89-219-5899
City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Response to Comment Letter R1- Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) R1.1 The comment notes that SoCalGas has multiple facilities within the Project site and requests 811/USA be called prior to demolition/excavation activities. The Project does not include demolition, excavations, or alterations to existing facilities, and modification to existing services would not be necessary for the Project. No further response is warranted.

City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment Letter R2 — Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
From: Mauricio Alvarez
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 202S 4:25 PM
To: Eric Jones
Subject: Redhawk Golf Course SPA and CUP
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Eric,
Thank you for including RTA in the development review of the Redhawk Golf Course SPA and CUP.

After reviewing the plans, there are no comments to submit for this particular project.

Thank you,
Mauricio Alvarez, MBA
Planning Manager
Riverside Transit Agency
p: 951.565.5260 1 e:

WWI skit 1 Facebook I Twitter I Instagram
1825 Third Street, Riverside, CA 92507
R2.1
City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Responses to Comment Letter R2 - Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) R2.1 This comment indicates RTA has reviewed the Project and has no comments. No response is warranted.

City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Comment Letter R3 — Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District)
Fmm: McKinney, Elsa
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2025 5,04 PM
To: Eric Jones
Cc: McNeill, Amy ; Cornelius, William
Subject: SPA, PA 23-0327 & CUP, PA 23-0251, Red hawk Golf Course -Due 7/30/2025 CAUTION: This emait originated from outside of the crganization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Eric,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Since this project does not pry}prise construction that would impact Riverside County Florid Control storm drain facilities and there are no fees to collect, the District has no comments. tsest twgarus,
0iJfElsa McKinney
Engineering Tech 1, Development Review
Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street, Riverside, CA 92501
951.955.2878
'Off an Mondays
R3.

City of Temecula

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Response to Comment Letter R3 - Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District)
R3.1 This comment states the District has no comments as Riverside County Flood Control storm drain facilities will not be impacted. No further response is warranted.

City of Temecula 10

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Attachment 1: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program City of Temecula

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
A.1 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
The purpose of this program is to identify the changes to the project, which the Lead Agency has adopted or made a condition of a project approval, in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The City of Temecula is the Lead Agency that must adopt the mitigation monitoring and reporting program. Section 21069 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statute defines Responsible Agency as a public agency, other than the Lead Agency, which has the responsibility for carrying out or approving a project.

CEQA statutes and Guidelines provide direction for clarifying and managing the complex relationships between a Lead Agency and other agencies with respect to implementing and monitoring mitigation measures. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(d) "when making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1) of CEQA, the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures."
Furthermore, Section 15097.d states "each agency has the discretion to choose its own approach to monitoring or reporting; and each agency has its own special expertise." This discretion will be exercised by implementing agencies at the time they undertake any of the individual improvement projects identified in the Draft IS/MND.

A completed and signed checklist for each measure indicates that a measure has been implemented and fulfills the City's monitoring requirements with respect to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6.

A.2 ACRONYMS AND INITIATIONS
dB(A) decibel A -weighted
Leq "equivalent continuous level"
NOI Noise
Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment 1 June 2025

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Signature and Date of
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Compliance

NOISE MEASURES
MM NOI-1: In order to comply with the City of Temecula Noise Ordinance, noise Project Applicant
Prior to each Pavilion
levels from amplified speakers shall be limited to a maximum of 84 dBA Leq at a (designated golf course
Event (event setup)
distance of 50 feet, and the speaker location shall be limited to the southeast corner representative/event
of the Pavilion. A designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall coordinator)
complete a noise measurement at 50 feet downstream from (or directly in front of) the amplified speakers and ensure the noise level does not exceed 84 dBA Leq. A City of Temecula Code
noise meter or cellular device -based decibel meter application shall be utilized to Enforcement
complete the noise measurement and adjust the speaker output volume. The speaker volume shall be adjusted to ensure that the maximum permissible noise level of 84 dBA Leq is not exceeded. The designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall maintain a logbook documenting the date and time of calibration (84 dBA at 50 feet) for each event that occurs. The designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall maintain each record for 90 days from the date of calibration. Upon request by the City of Temecula Code Enforcement, and only after the filing of a formal noise complaint by an adjacent resident, the logbook shall be provided to the City for verification.

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment 2 June 2025

Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Attachment 2: Public Draft IS/MND
City of Temecula

Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Redhawk Golf Course
Specific Plan Amendment
Prepared For
City of Temecula
Community Development Department
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
(951) 694-6400
;,u�i rriur3�ty .

Prepared By
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
3801 University Avenue, Suite 300
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 543-9868
June 2025

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

OVERVIEW
June 2025
This Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP). An Initial Study Checklist and environmental analysis has been prepared to determine the appropriate type of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document.

As documented in the attached Initial Study checklist, the proposed project would result in potentially significant impacts but mitigation measures can mitigate all impacts to less than significant levels. As such, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document for the proposed project.

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Initial Study / Environmental Checklist.....................................................................................................1

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT..........................................................................................4

1.1 Project Location................................................................................................................4

1.2 Project Setting and Land Uses............................................................................................4 RedhawkSpecific Plan.......................................................................................................4 RedhawkGolf Course........................................................................................................5 Pavilion.............................................................................................................................5 EnvironmentalSetting.......................................................................................................6

1.3 Project Purpose and Proposed Project Characteristics.......................................................7 Specific Plan Amendment..................................................................................................8 ConditionalUse Permit......................................................................................................8

1.4 Discretionary Actions and Approvals..................................................................................9 Aesthetics........................................................................................................................15 Agriculture and Forestry Resources................................................................................. 20 AirQuality....................................................................................................................... 22 Biological Resources........................................................................................................23 Cultural Resources...........................................................................................................25 Energy............................................................................................................................. 26 Geologyand Soils............................................................................................................ 28 Greenhouse Gas Emissions..............................................................................................33 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.................................................................................... 35 Hydrology and Water Quality.......................................................................................... 39 LandUse and Planning.....................................................................................................42 Mineral Resources...........................................................................................................45 Noise............................................................................................................................... 47 Populationand Housing................................................................................................... 51 PublicServices................................................................................................................. 52 Recreation....................................................................................................................... 55 Transportation................................................................................................................56 Tribal Cultural Resources.................................................................................................60 Utilities and Service Systems........................................................................................... 62 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Wildfire .........................................

Mandatory Findings of Significance
List of Tables
Table 1: Redhawk Specific Plan Land Use Summary ..........................

Table 2: Existing Land Uses and Zoning Designations ........................

Table 3: General Plan Land Use Goal and Policy Consistency Analysis Table 4: Noise Measurements..........................................................

Table 5: Pavilion Event Noise Levels ..................................................

List of Figures
Figure 1: Regional Location Map ..............

Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map .....................

Figure 3: Existing General Plan Land Use..

Figure 4: Existing Zoning ..........................

Figure 5: Conditional Use Permit Site Plan
Figure 6a: Site Photos ..............................

Figure 6b: Site Photos ..............................

Figure 6c: Site Photos ..............................

Appendices
Appendix A — Noise Analysis
Appendix B—Traffic Memorandum
June 2025
64 66
5 ,.6
43 47
49 12
13 14
17 18
19 (!9lCK r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Temecula

INITIAL STUDY / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Project Title
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
General Plan Designation
Zoning
June 2025
Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Project
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Eric Jones, Associate Planner, 951-506-5115
APN 962-040-012
James R. Wood, Redhawk Golf Course,
45100 Redhawk Parkway,
Temecula, CA 92592
Open Space
Specific Plan (SP-9)
Description of Project The Project proponent is seeking a Specific Plan Amendment to the Redhawk Specific Plan and a Conditional Use Permit to expand the range of uses allowed within the existing outdoor Pavilion at the Redhawk Golf Course and modify related
standards. The existing Pavilion is located between the main parking lot and driving range and is currently permitted to host outdoor golf -related events such as tournaments and award ceremonies. The proposed Project would allow for
additional types of events such as weddings, banquets,
meetings, corporate events, and other private events at the Pavilion. It is assumed that these special events may include amplified music/sound systems within the covered pavilion.

Currently, there is no restriction to the number of events. The Project would allow events any day of the week, but not more than three times per week.

Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Open Space, Medium Residential, Low Medium Residential Other Public Agencies
Approval is Required
Whose None
ram' . ` 1
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Have California Native American
tribes traditionally and culturally
affiliated with the project area
requested consultation pursuant to
Public Resources Code section
21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for
consultation that includes, for
example, the determination of
significance of impacts to tribal
cultural resources, procedures
regarding confidentiality, etc.?
June 2025
Consulting tribes were contacted by the City of Temecula in compliance with AB 52 and SB 18. All tribes that responded had no comments or further questions as the Project does not propose any grading or other ground disturbing activities.

NOTE: Conducting consultation early in the CEQ4 process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission's Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.
2 �C7►ILK tt'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
June 2025
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑
Aesthetics
❑
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
❑
Public Services
❑
Air Quality
❑
Hazards & Hazardous
❑
Recreation
❑
Agricultural and Forestry
Materials
❑
Transportation
Resources
❑
Hydrology/Water Quality
❑
Tribal Cultural Resources
❑
Biological Resources
❑
Land Use/Planning
❑
Utilities/Service Systems
❑
Cultural Resources
❑
Mineral Resources
❑
Wildfire
❑
Energy
®
Noise
❑
Mandatory Findings of
❑
Geology/Soils
❑
Population/Housing
Significance
DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this initial evaluation (check one):
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

CERTIFICATION:

Signature
Date
3 �C7►ILK tt'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT

1.1 Project Location
The Redhawk Specific Plan Amendment Project (Project) is located in the southern portion of the City of Temecula (City). The Redhawk Specific Plan ("Specific Plan" or "SP") area is generally located south of the intersection of Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch Parkway, and generally east of Interstate 15 (1-15) and south of California State Road 79 (SR-79). Refer to Figure 1: Regional Location Map. The Specific Plan is bounded by the Vail Ranch Specific Plan to the north, the Morgan Hill Planning Area to the east, the Wolf Creek Specific Plan to the west, and the Pechanga Reservation to the south. The Project proponent is seeking a Specific Plan Amendment to the Redhawk Specific Plan to add a new use and related standards for the new use. Proposed new use is a private event center to hold weddings, private parties, etc., within an existing pavilion. A Conditional Use Permit is also proposed to allow for a private event center to operate within an existing golf course, located at 45100 Redhawk Parkway, Temecula, CA 92592. Refer to Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map.

1.2 Project Setting and Land Uses
Redhawk Specific Plan
The Specific Plan area is an approximately 1,275-acre area comprising 21 planning areas. Existing general plan land uses within the Project site consist of low medium residential (LM), medium residential (M), public institutional facilities (PI), and open space (OS). The Specific Plan allows for residential, commercial, open space and recreation, golf course, circulation, and public facilities uses. Much of the Project site is developed with residential land uses, open space in the form of a golf course, and schools, along with accessory and ancillary uses. The Redhawk Golf Course is generally located in the center of the Specific Plan area.

The Redhawk Specific Plan was approved in 1988 and subsequently amended in 2000. Amendment No. 1 to the Redhawk Specific Plan amended the development standards of Planning Areas (PA) 12, 13, 15, 16, 20, and 21 to allow 5,000 square foot minimum lot size single family detached subdivisions of patio homes, zero lot line and z-lot configurations, and/or residential planned developments and multiple family residential developments. Additionally, Amendment No. 1 to the Redhawk Specific Plan did the following:

1. Enlarged PA 20 from 41.5 acres to 53.3 acres by changing the land use designation for the 5.2- acre Commercial Site "C" (PA 27) and 6.6 acres of the School Site "B" (PA 23 consisting of 9.6 acres) to Medium High Density Residential (MH, 8-14 DU/ac) and incorporating these planning areas into a reconfigured and expanded PA 20.

2. Enlarged PA 33 (Park Site "E") from 12.0 acres to 15.0 acres by changing the land use designation for 3.0 acres of School Site "B" (PA 23) to Park Site "E" and adding these 3.0 acres into a reconfigured and expanded PA 33.
4 �C7►ILK "'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

3. Changed the land use designation of School Site "C" (PA 24) to Medium Low Density (2-5 DLI/ac) Residential and changed the location of 11.0-acre School Site "C" (PA 24) from the south side of Camino San Dimas to a new PA 24 location consisting of 9.5 acres on the north side of Camino San Dimas in PA 2 which resulted in a reconfigured PA 2 that expanded from 129.1 acres to 131.5 acres.

Refer to Table 1: Redhawk Specific Plan Land Use Summary for more information specific to the existing allowable uses within the Redhawk Specific Plan.

Table 1: Redhawk Specific Plan Land Use Summary
Land Designation Planning Areas Gross Acres Maximum No. of DUs Residential
Medium Low Residential
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19
535.4
Z222
Medium Residential
6,9
120.1
667
Medium High Residential
11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 20, 21
132.8
1,299
Residential Total
788.3
4,188
Golf Course
36 182.7
-
School Sites
22,24

20.2 -
Commercial
25,26

22.8 -
Open Space
28 149.3
-
Parks
29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35

48.9 -
Streets and Roadways
-

63.4 -
Specific Plan Total
1,275.6
4,188
Source:

City of Temecula. 2010. SP-9 Redhawk Land Use Map and Planning Area Map. Available at http://Iaserfiche.citVoftemecula.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=232320&dbid=2&repo=Temecula&cr=1 (accessed July2024).

Redhawk Golf Course
The Redhawk Golf Course is an approximately 182.7-acre area of the Redhawk Specific Plan area (PA 36).

Pavilion
The Project focuses on an existing Pavilion at the Redhawk Golf Course, located adjacent to the pro shop.

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
in all directions. The Pavilion is designated as Open Space in the City's General Plan. Residential uses to the north are designated as Medium Residential while uses to the east, south, and west are designated Low Medium Residential. Refer to Table 2: Existing Land Uses and Zoning Designations below. Refer to Figure 3: Existing General Plan Land Use and Figure 4: Existing Zoning.

Table 2: Existing Land Uses and Zoning Designations
Location
Existing Zoning'
Existing General Plan Land Use 2
Pavilion Site
Specific Plan (SP-9)
Open Space
North
Specific Plan (SP-9)
Medium Residential Open Space
South
Specific Plan (SP-9)
Low Medium Residential Open Space
West
Specific Plan (SP-9)
Low Medium Residential
East
Specific Plan (SP-9)
Low Medium Residential Open Space
Source:
(1) City of Temecula. (2016). Zoning Map, City of Temecula. Available at: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1642/Zoning-Map- ?bidld= (accessed July 2024).
(2) City of Temecula. (2005). Temecula General Plan; Figure LU-3 Land Use Policy Map. Available at:
http://Iaserfiche.cityoftemecula.org/weblink/2/doc/275675/Electronic.aspx (accessed July 2024).

Environmental Setting
Topography
The Pavilion is generally flat with minor sloping at 1 percent to allow for site grading. The approximate surface elevation is 1,156 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The Pavilion and Redhawk Golf Course clubhouse were constructed on a slope, as such, there are retaining walls to the east of the Pavilion and steeper slopes to the west. Site drainage generally flows from south to north.

Biology
The Project site is entirely developed with landscaping and concrete. All existing vegetation at the Redhawk Golf Course and Pavilion are ornamental and subject to removal and replanting. General wildlife species would be consistent with animal species present in urban areas, such as reptiles, birds, small mammals, and other vertebrates.

Hydrology
The Project site is located within the Lower Temecula Creek Watershed (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC10):
1807030203). The Temecula Creek is located approximately 0.72 miles north of the Project site and would receive storm flows from the Project site.

Seismic Conditions
The Project site is in an area that is subject to ground motions due to earthquakes as is all of southern California; however, the Project is not located within a known fault zone. The nearest fault is the Wildomar Fault, a part of the Elsinore Fault Zone, and is located approximately 0.54 miles southwest of the Project 6 �C7►ILK tt'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
site. The Project site is outside of an Alquist-Priolo fault zone. Additionally, the Project site is not located within a California Geologic Survey (CGS) liquefaction zone.' Flood Zone Information
According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) No. 06065C3305G (effective date August 28, 2008), the Project site is located in Flood Zone X. Flood Zone X indicates areas that are outside the 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain (the 500-year flood).2 Infrastructure and Utilities
The Redhawk Golf Course is bounded on all sides by roadways and residential uses, however only Redhawk Parkway provides access to the Golf Course and Pavilion. There are existing internal access roads on the Project site. Further, the Project site is adequately served by all utilities.

Transit
The Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) provides bus services within the City of Temecula. RTA Route 24 operates in proximity to the Project site. The nearest stop for this route is located at the intersection of Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch Parkway, at the driveway entrance to the Project site and approximately

0.32 miles from the Pavilion. The nearest transfer point to the Project site is at the Temecula Valley Hospital located approximately 1.12 miles to the northwest of the Project site. RTA Route 24 has a stop at this location. Additionally, this route has a transfer point at the Pechanga Resort, located approximately

1.17 miles to the southwest of the Project site.

1.3 Project Purpose and Proposed Project Characteristics The Project proponent is seeking a Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) to the Redhawk Specific Plan and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to expand the types of events allowed within the existing outdoor Pavilion at the Redhawk Golf Course, located at 45100 Redhawk Parkway, refer to Figure 1: Regional Location Map and Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map. The existing Pavilion is located between the main parking lot and driving range and is currently permitted to host outdoor golf -related events such as tournaments and award ceremonies. The proposed Project would allow for additional events such as weddings, banquets, meetings, corporate events, and other private events at the Pavilion. It is assumed that these special events may include amplified music/sound systems within the covered Pavilion. The Pavilion was approved for construction in December 2020 as part of a minor modification. Currently, there is no restriction to the number of events. The Project would allow events any day of the week, but not more than three times per week.

California Geologic Survey. 2024. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/ (accessed July 2024).
z Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2008. Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 06065C3305G. j, 7
�C7►ILK tt'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
Specific Plan Amendment
The Redhawk Specific Plan will be amended in one location, specifically Section II.B.1.c Open Space and Recreation Standards. The text below shows the proposed amended text with additions shown with double underline and deletions shown in StFik :
*Golf Course (Planning Area 36) shall be developed on approximately 182.7 acres a. The golf course shall consist of 18 holes and a club house. An outdoor covered pavilion shall be allowed for hosting golf events as well as events listed below. In addition to the uses permitted in Ordinance No. 348, wedding facilities shall also be permitted upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Wedding facilities may also be used to host private events, including but not limited to the events listed below. • Weddings and related wedding events (e.g., bridal shower, rehearsal dinner, etc.
• Birthdays
• Anniversaries
• Corporate Functions
• Community Events
In the event that a similar use is proposed that is not listed above, the Community Development Director shall be allowed to make a consistency determination. b. The golf course shall be completed as part of Phase II.

C. Sep- A- Ee 348 2o210 fA-F r tt d uses -and- deve-lopment star d- Fds. Refer to Exhibit II-3, Planning Area 36 —Golf Course.
d. Refer to Section II. B. i. Landscaping Plan.
e. Parking for the golf course shall be required per Ordinance No. 348 (6 spaces/hole). f. Parking for the outdoor covered pavilion shall be required at 1 space/70 square feet.

Conditional Use Permit
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is being sought by the Project proponent to allow for additional types of private events, other than golf specific events, which could occur at the existing Pavilion. Under the existing Specific Plan, private events are allowed to occur at the existing Pavilion, provided they are golf related. The CUP would allow other events, such as weddings, banquets, birthdays, community outreach events, or any other private events. No new structures are proposed or would be developed as part of the Project. The CUP does not propose changes to the existing hours of operations, lighting, or parking of the Pavilion. Currently, there is no restriction to the number of events. The Project would allow events any day of the week, but not more than three times per week. Events would be allowed from 12:00 pm to 9:00 pm with all amplified noise ending at 9:00 pm. Amplified noise would be located on the southeastern "14,, 8

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
corner of the Pavilion. The CUP would allow an approximate maximum of 130 guests, the existing facility is currently permitted up to approximately 144 guests per event. Refer to Figure 5: Conditional Use Permit Site Plan for information related to the Pavilion and proposed tenant improvements.

The Project does not propose any construction nor physical alterations to the existing Redhawk Golf Course.

1.4 Discretionary Actions and Approvals
The City is the Lead Agency under CEQA and is responsible for reviewing and certifying the adequacy of the IS/MIND for the Project. It is expected that the City, at a minimum, would consider the data and analyses contained in this IS/MIND when making its permit determinations. Prior to implementation of the Project, discretionary permits and approvals must be obtained from local, state, and federal agencies, as listed below:

City of Temecula:
• Specific Plan Amendment to the Redhawk Specific Plan
• Conditional Use Permit
Other permits may be required for the Project but would not be discretionary. These permits, if required, would be ministerial and approved at a staff level.
9 �C7►ILK tt'

C LJIIV'

LAKELAND

VILLAGE
Camp Pendleton
79 79

WILDOMAR SYCAMORE
FRENCH Skinner HILLS
VALLEY Reservoir
SAGE
MURRIE

TEME'CULA
79 Ted
eoUla Pkwy
2ADEC
Reserva`

PROJECT SITE

RAINBOW

FALLBROOK
Naval Weapons
Station
Fallbrook
76 Pala
76 Reservation

BONSALL
Figure 1: Regional Location Map
Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Project
City of Temecula
Pauma and
Yuima
Reservation
PAUMA
VALLEY
RINCON

AGUANGP

PALOMAR

MOUNTAIN

LA JOLLA
AMAGO
371
ONot to scale Kimley>>> Horn

Project Locat[• f - .' x
' �3. { r
�,tea .Py: • , :As'``� R '' G ¢��i �+ �� " +� �, '�►
►`�e� y� � ♦" ,�� aOP `x Red Hawk Golf
■ „ y �, �. � � � Club
Gammito-
.- 00 '•� -
o : ♦ s `
Y.
• ...

Source: Neormap, March 2024.

Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map
Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Project
City of Temecula
ONot to scale Kimley>Morn

M -
0 L
ro
/ 0
0 6
LM
C
A
Source: City of Temecula, 2024.

Legend
Project Location
City General Plan Land Use
Open Space (OS)
Low Medium Density
Residential, 3-6 Du/Ac Max
(LM)
Medium Density Residential,
7-12 Du/Ac Max (M)
Figure 3: Existing General Plan Land Use
Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Project O Not to scale Kimley>>> Horn City of Temecula

4�1
0 L ?.
3� �4
Qt 1
ro
S
SP-9
SP-9
r..

O
Source: City of Temecula, 2024.

Legend
Project Location
City Zoning
Specific Plan (SP-#)
Figure 4: Existing Zoning
Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Project O Not to scale Ki mley >>> Horn City of Temecula

�o
/ 04
�eJq.
\ 2..E
NO3'ss'oo•w 2]z.00'
\60 M1V2'46
LNG' (:169S,
EX. LS
25 21 IX. PPRKINC / «
16 °1
5 « 13 26 IX. PARNING
« « EX. LS «
« f / Nsfigss':
« - IXt 3' RETNNING W EX. MONUME T SIGI
Y'i S ` « « EX, SFH1 / m
X. THA
E%. GOLF
COURSE « W99.9' " « `190MEN'S
IX. 3

ADMINISTRATIONRR
♦`EXEIING .N. .
« e WED I�tt «« e e e e e e e `\
p� . G F I LIMBS OF C.U.P.

EX 1. 1OCCUPANCY: AJ f 1pg•4]'35•W 552.5a

EXISTING
OR Hop
g� EX. GOLF
oc . B �Po w WOREE EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS
�'"

6. MNNTEO NNANC " \
5n C W WAV
�b ..

Pof
' EX Ls S
7 �y
C)
1r
ri
O
022W IX, GOLF
COURSE
Source: Temecula Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2025.

Wuu wAFoc

VICINITY MAP
I �
1 IX. REFUNING WIAL 2'-9' HIGH
INTE
NOTE: Roj—r ,,,t"�WNEEL CUT R-5o' `\
UTILITIES: `� \IXIEm
N22 0 O PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
' E�CTRIC So THERN CAUFORNM EOISON Pr OR R=56'

SOUTHIAL

CABLETELEPHI SPECTRUM

COONE EFUNTE, M
DATA TABLE: &TTER RANCHO wpTNR uNlcnTloxs EASEMENT NOTES:

PN.E 6 0 0011E S R FAS MU ICIPAL WATER DISTRICT QANCEASEMEMIT FOR EITHER OR BOTN POLE LINES. CONDUITS OR UNDERGROUND ccu ocscRlPnorv: vAxcLPiROFAv.M. NO. 24}B] PMB 164/s-]o BUILDING SUMMARY: cAL! A mIMiN aLvaH+r.PRO NSTELMENT 1E.FDED FEEPLARY 25, 19G1 GOONNINO DEESIIDIUTIION: q.P.-9 EXISTING ADMINISTRATION OFFICE: 2,5]8 S.F. INSIR 1 NO a ]M aF DFFI IAL RECO DS OF R VER NTT EXISnNG INC USEIGGOLF COURSE OCCLPANCv.B WOOD FRAME AN
EASEMEM FOR TH£1HEFEINPF1EFtC5PECI'ICRPURPOSE ANDSio DOENTAL PROPOSED LAND USE GOLF COURSE, EVENT CENTER N WEDDING FACIUIY NO FFIR S PLFPoSES IN FA OR OF RNNONI CPLIFIXMIA WATER DIEiR'CA, CA PUBLIC o IVALE PE�RMR: PP�192]] MWHFEOFPSi TES. 1 OY ORATION. INVINSIFKKNi {COFAED UANUA 024T CA ASOINSTRUNENT TOTAL NET PRG 355.]22 SF. 6.16 ACRES HEIGHT. 16 EASEMENT IS FOR PIRELIE ORNO 5792 OF OFFICIAL SOF PIPELINES, DOGETNERYw I TH INCIDENTALAID TOTAL EXISTING BUILDING AREA: 13.86E SF. 3.9 R
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PRO SHOP. 2,650 S.F. ALONG THROUGHMp A SS i REAL PROPERTVNSITUATED IN TIE UP ON,
R OCCLPANCr.B OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

PAVEME iUHPR��APE AREA: 19468] SF, 3A ORES, 4EAR H.p FIFE MR TRUERS N: WOW FRAME THEEFFE T OF A CFANT OF E gMENI AM 0 E TS FM 0039 LANDSCAPING ] F, :5 R 54.]R MABR OF STORIES: 1 �E%EOIiEDCBY C4SAi AnERICANADEVELOPMENTMCOMPANYNANDCUVMTAPETIRS TRUMENT NO 1P77U7 OF
HEIPIT. 23 OFFICIAL dCOFDS OF RIVERS15'IDE COUNTY�SCALIFORNIA. S EASEMENT IS PARKING CALCULATIONS: EXISTING CANTINA. B]D s.F. FOR VISUAL FENCING. MAINTENANCE ARM ACCESS PURPOSES,

ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OCCFEANCI D D FRAME LEGEND
REQUIRED SPACES. 11 2,1]0 s.F. - 1 SPACE/200sF No FIRE SPED._ RE OF SPEDHTUIRCLEas N: woo COH.pITIONAL USE PERMIT BgIN1A11 LE MM.cER OF STORIES. 1
CANTINA: HEIGHT: 6' """""""""""' EXISTING ADA PATH OF TRAVEL SERVING AREA: 8]0 S.F. - 1 SPACE/4 5 S.F.
.DUIRED SPACES: 19 EXISTING MAINTENANCE: 4, 100 S.F. EXISTING 10' PARKING LIGHT

NOYPGOF IONWOOD FRAME
IHE PROSNOP:OE:

OR AREA. 2, 1DO S.F. - 1 SPACE/200 S.F. NWBER OF STI E'5: 1 EXISTING MASOURY WALL ASSEMBLY AREA: 1,200 S.F. - 1 SPACE/70 S.F. OCCUPPNCY: A3 k « . EXISTING LMDSCAPE REGUIRED SPACES:46 i1TE OF CDNSIRUCII STEEL
NO FIFE SPRIIMERSOH. SSH SUPERFINE HYDRANT
GOT COURSE: MWEER OF STCRIES 1
A UHc ', tOB . HEIGHT 6 RR REST EO
gEOUI OIA
SPACES

OTAL REQUIRW
ED SPACES: �94 i0TP1: E%. EXISTING
TOTAL PROVIDED SPACES: 940xcDESREOUIRCOIADASPACEs1 FAR FLOOR AREA RATIO Figure 5: Conditional Use Permit Site Plan
Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Project Not to scale Ki mle >>> Horn City of Temecula Y

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

AESTHETICS

1. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not X
limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing X
visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing
scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 1a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 1b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? 1c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? 1d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course while reducing the maximum number of events per week and number of guests allowed. As there would be no new structures, construction, or alterations, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, substantially damage scenic resources, or create new sources of light or glare. Refer to Figure 6: Site Photos. No impact would occur.

According to CEQA Guidelines PRC Section 21071, an urbanized area is an incorporated city that has a population of at least 100,000 persons or an incorporated city that has a population of less than 100,000 persons and not more than two contiguous incorporated cities combined equals at least 100,000 persons. r
15 (!9lCK 4 A'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
The Project site is within the City of Temecula, which is an incorporated city, with a population of approximately 110,682.3 As such, the Project is located in an urbanized area and the following discussion analyzes whether the Project would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality.

The proposed specific plan amendment and conditional use permit as part of the Project would expand the types of events that would be hosted at the existing Pavilion. Currently, events are permitted to occur at the Pavilion provided they are golf related. There would be no amendments to the development standards or design guidelines of the Redhawk Specific Plan which govern scenic quality, as such, no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is required.

References:

US Census Bureau. 2023. QuickFacts: Temecula City, California. Available at:
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/temeculacitycalifornia/RH1225222 (accessed July 2024).
3 US Census Bureau. 2023. QuickFacts: Temecula City, California. Available at:
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/temeculacitycalifornia/RH1225222 (accessed July 2024). 16 0R
F
r !. ...Ill
Legend
Photo
Source: Nearmap, 2024.

Figure 6a: Site Photos
Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Project O Not to scale Kimley»> Horn City of Temecula

- it. U IL
Photo #1: Photo Location 1, looking northeast towards the interior of the Project site.
t1_1
1I - � >> Horn
City of Temecula Y

Photo #4: Photo Location 4, looking south towards the interior of the Project site.

Photo #5: Photo Location 5, looking northeast towards the interior of the Project site.

Photo #6: Photo Location 6, looking east towards the interior of the Project site.

Figure 6c: Site Photos
Redhawk Golf Course Specific Plan Amendment Project
City of Temecula
Kimley>))Horn

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
June 2025

2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X
Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, X
forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest X
land to non -forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non -forest use?
2o) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? 2b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? 2c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code ._ 20

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 511O4(g))?
2d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non forest use? 2e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non forest use?
No Impact. According to the Temecula GP Open Space/Conservation Element, the Project site does not contain prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance.4 The Project site is apart of the Redhawk Specific Plan and has a land use designation of Open Space with a primary focus on the Redhawk Golf Course. The Redhawk Specific Plan does not allow agricultural uses. Further, the Project site is not under a Williamson Act Contract.s There are no existing forest lands or timberlands on site and the Project would not convert or cause the loss of existing forest lands. As such, no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is required.

References:

California Department of Conservation. 2024. California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/WilliamsonAct/ (accessed July 2024).

City of Temecula. 2002. Exhibit OSC-5: Agricultural Resources. Available at https://temecuIaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/287/Open-Space-Conservation-PDF?bidId= (accessed July 2024).
° California Department of Conservation. 2022. California Important Farmland Finder. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ (accessed July 2024). s California Department of Conservation. 2024. California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/WilliamsonAct/ (accessed July 2024). 21 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

AIR QUALITY

3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
X
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- X
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
X
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors X
adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
3a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? 3b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
3c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 3d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. Although the Project could increase the frequency and total number of events over the course of a year, due to the events not being restricted to golf -related events, the Project would not increase the daily Pavilion venue capacity or increase operational characteristics. In fact, the Project proposes a reduction in the individual event intensity with a smaller maximum permitted number of guests. The Project would not create any new sources of emissions and as such, no impact would occur. r
22 (!9lCK 4 A'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
June 2025

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally X
protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
X
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
4a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
4b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? 23 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
4c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological?
4d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
4e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
4f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As the Project does not propose new development, exists wholly within a previously disturbed and developed area, and would not implement new operations which would impact biological resources, no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.
r
24 (!9lCK 4 A'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

CULTURAL RESOURCES
S. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
X
outside of dedicated cemeteries?
5a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to in § 15064.5?
5b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
5c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As the Project would not physically disturb any land which may contain historical or archaeological resources, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical or archaeological resource. Further, the Project site is a previously developed area, and humans remains could not be inadvertently discovered as no new development is proposed. No impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.
r1, ` 25
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
ENERGY

6. ENERGY. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due X
to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
X
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
6a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests.

Energy consumption by the Project would be a result of transportation energy required for patrons to arrive to and depart from the Pavilion. Additionally, there would be direct energy consumption resultant of the lighting, heating, or other amenities offered during events at the Pavilion. However, the Pavilion is an existing structure and events are already permitted, provided they are golf related. The Project would allow other types of events; however, operationally, there would be no changes to how events are hosted and operated on a daily basis. As such, there would be no increase in the energy consumption on a daily basis, either transportation or direct energy, at the Pavilion and Redhawk Golf Course during events after Project implementation. In fact, there may be a nominal decrease in the total amount of energy resources utilized due to the reduction in maximum number of guests allowed and total number of events per week.

However, this reduction is likely not discernible when compared to what is currently permitted. Although the Project could allow for additional events over the course of a year, these events are generally anticipated to be from local patrons that would be hosting these events with or without the availability of the Redhawk Golf Course Pavilion. The Project would provide an additional venue option for special events, which in some cases would likely be closer to the event guests. As such, no impact would occur. 6b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? No Impact. Title 24 of the CCR contains energy efficiency standards for residential and non-residential buildings based on a state mandate to reduce California's energy demand. Specifically, Title 24 addresses a number of energy efficiency measures that impact energy used for lighting, water heating, heating, and air conditioning, including the energy impact of the building envelope such as windows, doors, skylights, r1, ` 26
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
wall/floor/ceiling assemblies, attics, and roofs. The Redhawk Golf Course would have already demonstrated compliance with these measures during its design, implementation, and construction and would therefore not apply to the Project.

Part 6 of Title 24 specifically establishes energy efficiency standards for residential and nonresidential buildings constructed in the State of California in order to reduce energy demand and consumption. This would not apply to the Project as the Project proposes no new construction or development.

The Riverside County Climate Action Plan Update establishes a series of energy related goals intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions based on Assembly Bill (AB) 32 Scoping Plan.' Those applicable to the Project are Renewables Portfolio Standard for Building Energy Use, AB 1109 Energy Efficiency Standards for Lighting, Electricity Energy Efficiency, and Commercial Energy Efficiency Requirements.

The Project would not conflict with any of the federal, state, or local plans for renewable energy and energy efficiency. Because the Project would comply with the Riverside County Climate Action Plan Update measures, no conflict with existing energy standards and regulations would occur. Therefore, no impact associated with renewable energy or energy efficiency plans would occur.

Mitigation Measures:

No mitigation measures are necessary.

References:

Riverside County. 2019. County of Riverside Climate Action Plan Update. Available at https://Planning.rctlma.org/sites/R/files/aldnop416/files/migrated/Portals-14-CAP-2019-2019- CAP-Update-Full.pdf (accessed July 2024).
a Riverside County. 2019. County of Riverside Climate Action Plan Update. Available at https://planning.rctlma.org/sites/g/files/aldnop4l6/files/migrated/Portals-14-CAP-2019-2019-CAP-Update-Full.pdf (accessed July 2024). 27 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

GEOLOGY AND SOILS
June 2025

7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
X
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
X
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including
X
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of X
the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
direct or indirect risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
7a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on ._ 28

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The nearest fault to the Pavilion is the Wildomar Fault, located approximately 0.52 miles to the southwest of the Pavilion, and is apart in the Elsinore Fault Zone.' Due to the Project's location, all existing structures would have been subject to all applicable regulations in the CBC that was approved at the time of development. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As no new structures or development would occur, and the Project would not increase the number of people permitted to be on -site during an event, the Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. A less than significant impact would occur, and no mitigation is necessary.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in southern California, which is a region prone to strong seismic ground shaking. The seismic hazard most likely to impact the Project site is ground -shaking due to a large earthquake on one of the major active regional faults. As previously mentioned, the Project site is not located on a major fault, however, strong shaking could still impact the Project site should an earthquake occur at the faults nearest the Project site. The existing structures at the Project site, including the Pavilion, would have been designed and constructed in conformance with the then current CBC, City regulations, and other applicable standards. The CBC design standards correspond to the level of seismic risk in each location and are intended primarily to protect public safety and secondly to minimize property damage. Conformance with standard engineering practices and design criteria established in the then -current CBC would have reduced the effects of seismic ground shaking on the Pavilion and existing structures. The CBC is updated every three years, last updated in 2022 and went into effect January 1, 2023; however, existing structures need not be retrofit to comply with updated CBC standards unless they meet specific requirements, such as being related to emergency services or are critical community infrastructure (hospitals with surgery centers, emergency vehicle garages, emergency operations centers, fire departments, etc.). Generally, the types of updates which occur during the normal 3-year update cycle are minimal and would not result in significant changes to the code, as such, the existing structures, including the Pavilion, would likely still be compliant with the now current (2022 CBC) standards.

As no new structures, grading or development would occur, the existing facilities would have been designed and constructed in compliance with the then current CBC with the intent to resist ground shaking and other seismic forces, and the Project would not increase the number of people permitted to be on - California Geologic Survey. 2024. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/ (accessed July 2024). rca%lw 29

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
site during an event, the Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects involving strong ground shaking. A less than significant impact would occur, and no mitigation is necessary.
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? No Impact. Soil liquefaction is a state of soil particles suspension caused by a complete loss of strength when the effective stress drops to zero. Liquefaction normally occurs under saturated conditions in soils such as sand in which the strength is purely frictional. Primary factors that trigger liquefaction are moderate to strong ground shaking (seismic source), relatively clean, loose granular soils (primarily poorly graded sands and silty sands), and saturated soil conditions (shallow groundwater).

A portion of the Redhawk Golf Course lies within a liquefaction zone as identified by the California Geologic Survey.8 However, the Pavilion, which is the subject of the Project, is not located within a liquefaction zone. Additionally, according to the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the Pavilion is underlain with "Rough broken land" which is classified as a bedrock material.9 Bedrock is not susceptible to liquefaction.

Furthermore, the Project is located at an existing facility and would not directly or indirectly cause a potential substantial adverse effect involving liquefaction. No impact would occur. iv) Landslides?
No Impact. The Project site is relatively flat and there are no steep slopes present. The Temecula GP Public Safety Element does not identify the Project site as an area with potential landslide risks.10 As such, no impact would occur.
7b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As no new structures or development would occur, the Project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. No impact would occur.
7c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Less than Significant Impact. As previously discussed, the Project site is not in an area prone to liquefaction or landslide. Lateral spreading is a phenomenon in which soils move laterally during seismic a Ibid.
9 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. ND. Web Soil Survey. Available at https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx (accessed July 2024). 10 City of Temecula. 2005. Temecula General Plan, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1. Available at https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/288/Public-Safety-PDF?bidld= (accessed July 2024). iea 30

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
shaking and is often associated with liquefaction. The amount of movement depends on the soil strength, duration and intensity of seismic shaking, topography, and free face geometry. Subsidence is a general term for downward vertical movement of the Earth's surface, which can be caused by both natural processes and human activities. Subsidence involves little or no horizontal movement. It is often caused by the removal of ground water, oil, natural gas, or mineral resources out of the ground by pumping, fracking, or mining activities. The Project does not propose the extraction of any of these resources nor are any of the uses located in the immediate vicinity of the Project. Further, the Temecula GP Public Safety Element does not indicate that the Project site is located within an area that is known to be at risk of lateral spreading or subsidence. As such, impacts would be less than significant. 7d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less than Significant Impact. When certain soil types are exposed to water, mainly those with moderate to high clay content, they can deform and either shrink or swell, depending on their particular physical characteristics. Such soils can expose overlying buildings to differential settlement and other structural damage. Soils that typically exhibit these behaviors are clayey soils.

As previously discussed, the soils at the Pavilion site consist of bedrock materials. As the Pavilion site does not contain a majority or a significant amount of clayey soils, it is therefore not located on expansive soils.

Impacts would be less than significant.
7e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. The Project does not propose the installation and operation of septic tanks. The Project is an existing facility and is already connected to a municipal sewer system. No impact would occur. 7f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As the Project would not physically disturb any land which may contain historical or archaeological resources, the Project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. No impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures:

No mitigation measures are necessary.
�K 31

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
References:

California Geologic Survey. 2024. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/ (accessed July 2024).

City of Temecula. 2005. Temecula General Plan, Public Safety Element; Figure PS-1. Available at https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/288/Public-Safety-PDF?bidld= (accessed July 2024).

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. ND. Web Soil Survey.

Available athttps:Hwebsoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.asp (accessed July 2024). r1, ` 32
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or X
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation X
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
8a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit, which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. The Project is an existing facility and would not construct new facilities or improvements which would produce short- term emission nor would it cause operational changes which would increase long-term emissions from the existing facility. In fact, the Project proposes reducing the total number of events permitted each week and reducing the number of guests from 144 per event to 130 per event. This would generate a net benefit when compared to the existing uses permitted. The Project would reduce the daily Pavilion venue capacity and/or operational characteristics. As such, there would be no impact. 8b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Less than Significant Impact.

GHG Plan Consistency
CARB 2022 Scoping Plan
CARB's 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality (2022 Scoping Plan), adopted December 15, 2022, sets a path to achieve targets for carbon neutrality and reduce anthropogenic GHG emissions by 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045 in accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 1279. The Project would benefit from the State targets set forth within the 2022 Scoping Plan. As the Project would not increase operational impacts, and in fact would reduce the operational impact of the existing use, it could not cause GHG emissions to be increased above the SCAQMD 3,000 MTCOze/year threshold, the Project would not interfere with the State's goals for reducing GHG emissions. �K 33

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
It is assumed that a majority of the existing facility's emissions are from energy and mobile sources which would be further reduced by implementation of current State programs. It should be noted that the Project and the City have no control over vehicle emissions. However, these emissions would decline in the future due to statewide measures, including the reduction in the carbon content of fuels, CARB's advanced clean car program, CARB's mobile source strategy, fuel efficiency standards, cleaner technology, and fleet turnover. Additionally, the Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG's) 2024-2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (Connect SoCal) is also expected to help California reach its GHG reduction goals, with reductions in per capita transportation emissions of 19 percent by 2035. Accordingly, the Project does not interfere with the State's efforts to reduce GHG emissions in 2030. Furthermore, the Project would not increase the existing facility's emissions.

Project operations would benefit from the implementation of current and potential future energy regulations including the SB 100 renewable electricity portfolio target of 60 percent renewable energy by 2030. SIB 100 also established a further goal to have an electric grid that is entirely powered by clean energy by 2045.

City of Temecula Sustainability Plan
The City of Temecula Sustainability Plan (Sustainability Plan), adopted June 22, 2010, identifies current and future climate change goals. The Sustainability Plan includes several goals for reducing GHG emissions through energy and water efficiency, waste reduction, and embracing cleaner technology. The Project would be consistent with the applicable sustainability goals outlined in the Sustainability Plan.

The Project would not create any new structures, nor would it change the basic function of the existing Pavilion. Rather, it would expand the range of events allowed at the Pavilion, although these are anticipated to be similar in nature as existing golf -related events. Any future event at the Pavilion would be subject to the Specific Plan Amendment, CUP, and existing City, regional, and State GHG requirements.

Further, the nearest public transit stops, specifically for buses, are located at the end of the driveway for the Redhawk Golf Course. As such, the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan or policy in the Sustainability Plan and impacts would be less than significant.

As discussed above, the Project would comply with the applicable State, Regional, and local goals and policies with regard to reducing GHG emissions. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, and a less than significant impact would occur. Further, Project implementation would not result in any construction -related impacts, nor would the Project affect operational air quality and GHG impacts on a daily basis. No mitigation measures would be required.

Mitigation Measures:

No mitigation measures are necessary.
�K 34

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
June 2025

9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
X
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
X
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely X
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
X
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, X
to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
9a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
Less Than Significant Impact. The routine use, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials is primarily associated with industrial uses that require such materials for operations or produce hazardous wastes as by-products of production applications. Both the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulate the transport of hazardous waste and material, including transport via highway. The U.S. EPA administers permitting, tracking, reporting, and operations requirements established by the ram" '` 35
(lLCC4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The DOT regulates the transportation of hazardous materials through enforcement of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act. This act includes requirements for container design and labeling, as well as for driver training. The established regulations are intended to track and manage the safe interstate transportation of hazardous materials and waste. Additionally, State and local agencies enforce the application of these acts and coordinate safety and mitigation responses in the case that accidents involving hazardous materials occur.

The Project does not propose or facilitate any activity involving significant use, routine transport, or disposal of hazardous substances. No construction would occur and therefore no use, transport, or disposal of hazardous substances typically associated with construction activity would occur.

During Project operations, widely used hazardous materials commonly at golf course uses including cleaners, pesticides, and potentially food waste would be present. The remnants of these and other products are disposed of as household hazardous waste that are prohibited or discouraged from being disposed of at local landfills. However, these would be existing at the Project site and the Project itself would not increase the use of these materials. Further, pesticides or fertilizers which may be used to maintain the golf course would not be used at the Pavilion, which is a structure. Regular operation and maintenance of the Project structures would not result in significant impacts involving use, storage, transport or disposal of hazardous wastes and substances. Use of common hazardous materials and their disposal does not present a substantial health risk to the community. Additionally, the Project site is not included on the list of hazardous waste sites (Cortese List) compiled by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and therefore would not release known hazardous materials due to ground -disturbing activities, as none would occur." Project impacts associated with the routine transport and use of hazardous materials or wastes would be less than significant.
9b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
No Impact. The Project site is not identified as a hazardous waste site with either an active or past occurrence. 12, 11 Only one site listed on EnviroStor is within 1 mile of the Pavilion and is classified as having no action required. This site is the Redhawk High School No. 3 and Middle School No. 5 (located at Pala Road and Pachanga Road).

Although typical hazardous materials associated with open space uses, these hazardous materials would not be used in large amounts such that they would create a significant hazard involving the release of these materials. Because the Project does not propose alterations to existing facilities, there would be no impacts related to structures with asbestos -containing materials or lead -based paint.

Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor. 2024. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. Available at https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress= (accessed July 2024). z DTSC. 2024. DTSC's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List —Site Cleanup (Cortese List). Available at https://dtsc.ca.gov/dtscs-cortese-list/ (accessed July 2024).
s State Water Resources Control Board. 2024. GeoTracker. Available at https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/ (accessed July 2024). �K 36

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
Potential hazards to the public or the environment could be introduced through the accidental upset or release of hazardous materials caused by accidental spillage of hazardous materials used during construction phases, or as a result of the exposure of contaminated soil during grading activities. However, the Project does not propose any construction and therefore no impact would occur. 9c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. The closest schools to the Project site are Pauba Valley Elementary School (33125 Regina Drive, Temecula) and Great Oak High School (32400 Camino San Dimas, Temecula), each located immediately adjacent to the Redhawk Golf Course on the northeast and southern boundary of the Redhawk Golf Course, respectively. Additionally, Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School (32400 Camino San Dimas, Temecula), and Redhawk Elementary School (32045 Cam San Jose, Temecula), are located within

0.25 miles of the boundary of the Redhawk Golf Course. The closest school to the Pavilion, which the Project is focused on, is Redhawk Elementary School which is located approximately 0.32 miles west of the center of the Pavilion. Additionally, according to the Temecula GP Growth Management/ Public Facilities Element, no schools are proposed within the immediate vicinity of the Project site. The Project does not propose the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course.

Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. Therefore, the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. No impact would occur. 9d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. As previously discussed in Impact 9a, the Project site is not included on the list of hazardous waste sites (Cortese List) compiled by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and therefore would not release known hazardous materials due to ground -disturbing activities. No impact would occur.
9e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The nearest airport to the Project site is the French Valley Airport (37600 Sky Canyon Drive, Murrieta), and is located approximately 6.7 miles northwest of the Project site. The Project site is not located within the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the French Valley Airport and would therefore r1, ` 37
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the Project area.14 Therefore, no impact would occur.
9f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. Refer to Section 20, Wildfire. Additionally, the Project does not propose alterations to the City's existing circulation network nor propose the implementation of incompatible land uses which could possibly interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course.

However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As such, no impact would occur, and no mitigation is necessary.
9g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
No Impact. Refer to Section 20, Wildfire. The Project site is not located within a very high fire hazard severity zone and is located within a developed and urban portion of the City. As such, the Project would not expose people or structures to a risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is necessary.

Mitigation Measures:

No mitigation measures are necessary.

References:

Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor. 2024. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. Available at https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.Rov/public/map/?myaddress= (accessed July 2024).

DTSC. 2024. DTSC's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List —Site Cleanup (Cortese List). Available at https://dtsc.ca.gov/dtscs-cortese-list/ (accessed July 2024).

Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. 2010. Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Policy Document (April 2010). Available at
https://rcaIuc.org/sites/R/files/aldnop421/files/2023-06/french%20valley.pdf (accessed July 2024).

State Water Resources Control Board. 2024. GeoTracker. Available at https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.Rov/map/ (accessed July 2024). 4 Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. 2010. Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Policy Document (April 2010); Map FV-3. Available at https://rcaIuc.org/sites/g/files/aldnop421/files/2023-06/french%20vaIley.pdf (accessed July 2024). ..ELK 38

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
June 2025

10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere X
substantially with groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- X
site?
ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface X
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on -
or offsite?
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would
X
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
X
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of X
pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
X
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
10a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
No Impact. The Project site is located within the jurisdiction of the San Diego RWQCB. In California, the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Section 13000 of the California Water Code), and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972 or the Clean Water Act requires comprehensive water quality control plans be developed for all waters within the State of California. r1, ` 39
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As the Project would not require any construction which could generate polluted water runoff, nor would it alter the operations of the Redhawk Golf Course which could generate polluted water runoff, no impact would occur. 10b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
No Impact. As previously discussed, the Project would not cause operational changes which would alter the manner at which the special events are operated. As such, there would be no increases in the amount of water which would be utilized by special events after Project implementation. As the Redhawk Golf Course is currently adequately served by the Rancho California Water District (RCWD), who receives water from the Temecula Valley Groundwater Basin and the State Water Project (SWP), the Project would be adequately served after Project implementation. Additionally, the proposed uses are consistent with the existing use which was evaluated in the RCWD's 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). As such, the Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies. Further, the Project would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge by increasing the amount of impervious surface area at the Project site. No impact would occur.
10c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite?
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
No Impact. The Project does not propose any physical alterations to the Redhawk Golf Course or the Pavilion where special events would be hosted. The Project would expand the types of special events which could be hosted at the Pavilion; however, these events would be hosted consistently with the existing special events which do not cause temporary drainage pattern alterations while occurring. As no new structures, or other types of physical alterations would occur as a result of Project implementation, no impact would occur.
r1, 40
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
10d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
No Impact. The Project site is located approximately 24 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean and the Santa Ana Mountain range lies between the Project site and the Pacific Ocean. Given the distance from the coast and the presence of the Santa Ana Mountains, the potential for the Project site to be inundated by tsunami is extremely low. The nearest lake or other large water body is Vail Lake, approximately 5.77 miles east-northeast of the Redhawk Golf Course. Given the distance from this reservoir, there is no potential for seiche to impact the Project site. As previously noted, the Project site is FEMA Flood Zone X, which indicates areas that are outside the 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain. Additionally, the Project site is not located within the Vail Lake Dam inundation area, and therefore is not at risk of inundation as a result of dam breach." The Project site is not at risk of inundation as a result of tsunami, seiche, or dam breach, nor is it located within a flood hazard area. No impact would occur. 10e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
No Impact. As previously discussed, in Impact 10b, the Project site would not increase the water demand at the Redhawk Golf Course and would be operated consistently with the existing uses, which were evaluated in the RCWD 2020 UWMP. As a result, the Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies nor interfere with groundwater recharge.

The objective of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) is sustainable groundwater management in a manner that prevents significant and unreasonable impacts to groundwater basins in California. Under SGMA, each high and medium -priority basin, as identified by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), is required to have a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) that will be responsible for groundwater management and development of a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP).

The Temecula Valley Groundwater Basin is not listed as a high priority basin and therefore does not have a GSP developed nor implemented. The Project would not increase the amount of impervious surface area at the Project site, which limits the ability for water to infiltrate and potentially recharge groundwater sources. As such, no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures:

No mitigation measures are necessary.

References:

California Department of Water Resources Division of Safety of Dams. 2021. Dam Breach Inundation Map Web Publisher. Available at https://fmds.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=dam prototype v2 (accessed July 2024).
s California Department of Water Resources Division of Safety of Dams. 2021. Dam Breach Inundation Map Web Publisher. Available at https://fmds.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=dam prototype v2 (accessed July 2024). ;,- 41

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

LAND USE AND PLANNING

11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Physically divide an established community?
X
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict X
with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
11a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The Project does not propose any physical alterations to the Redhawk Golf Course or the Pavilion where special events would be hosted. The Project would expand the types of special events which could be hosted at the Pavilion. No new structures would be constructed, and no new developments would occur, as such, the Project would not physically divide an established community.

No impact would occur.
11b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The Project proposes an amendment to the Redhawk Specific Plan to allow for different types of special events to be hosted at the Redhawk Golf Course. This amendment to the Redhawk Specific Plan would not alter the land uses allowed at any location within the Redhawk Specific Plan, nor would it require a general plan amendment to alter the general plan land use designations for parcels within the Specific Plan area or City.

SCAG 2024-2050 RTP/SCS
On September 30, 2008, SIB 375 was passed to help achieve AB 32 goals related to the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs) through regulation of cars and light trucks.16 SIB 375 aligns three policy areas of importance to local government: (1) regional long-range transportation plans and investments, (2) regional allocation of the obligation for cities and counties to zone for housing, and (3) a process to achieve GHG emissions reductions targets for the transportation sector. It establishes a process for CARB to develop GHG emissions reductions targets for each region (as opposed to individual local governments or households). SB 375 also requires MPOs to prepare an SCS within the RTP that guides growth while taking into account the transportation, housing, environmental, and economic needs of the region.

Every four years, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) updates Connect SoCal, the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The most recent RTP/SCS e California Legislative Information. 2008. 58-375 Transportation planning: travel demand models: sustainable communities strategy:
environmental review. Available at https://Ieginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/biIINavCllent.Xhtml?bill id=200720080SB375 (accessed July 2024). �K 42

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
named the Connect SoCal 2024, outlines a vision for a more resilient and equitable future and contains investment, policies and strategies for achieving the region's shared goals through 2050. Connect SoCal 2024 includes elements that are organized within the pillars of Mobility, Communities, Environment and Economy. These goals are not mutually exclusive, they are mutually reinforcing. For example, the decisions and actions taken to achieve mobility goals can also help to achieve and support environmental goals. Connect SoCal 2024 was approved by SCAG's Regional Council in April 2024.17 The goals of the 2024-2050 RTP/SCS were reviewed, and none were determined to be relevant or applicable to the Project. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with the RTP/SCS.

City of Temecula General Plan
Land Use Element
The Land Use Plan for Temecula addresses the manner in which the City will grow over the next 20 years.

Land uses are classified and mapped, showing where the City anticipates residential, commercial and industrial development, and identifying areas set aside for community purposes, such as parks, schools, and open spaces. The Plan also includes provisions allowing high -quality, well -designed mixed -use projects adjacent to the 1-15 Corridor and provides standards for the preservation of several rural areas unique to Temecula that help to define the City's character. At the same time, the Plan outlines measures the City can take to preserve single-family neighborhoods, conserve natural and aesthetic resources, establish a long-term role for Old Town within the fabric of the community, and ensure that regional land use and transportation planning decisions have positive benefits for the City.

The Project meets the applicable land use goals because the Project proposes land uses consistent with the zoning and Temecula GP Land Use Element designations of open space, refer to Table 3: General Plan Land Use Goal and Policy Consistency Analysis.

Table 3: General Plan Land Use Goal and Policy Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan ..
l and Policy Project Consistency
Land Use Element
Land Use Goal 1 — A diverse and integrated mix of Consistent: The Project is located at an existing golf course (open residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public space/recreational) which is located immediately adjacent to and open space land uses. residential uses and within close proximity to commercial/retail uses. As such, there would be a diverse and integrated mix of land uses within close proximity to each other.

Land Use Policy 1.6— Encourage flexible zoning techniques Consistent: The Project is located at an existing golf course which in appropriate locations to encourage mixed use provides recreational and open space uses for adjacent uses. The development, preserve natural features, achieve Project would allow for additional types of special events to be innovative site design, achieve a range of transition of hosted at the Redhawk Golf Course which would increase the use densities, provide open space and recreation facilities, of the Golf Course beyond golf -related events and would and/or provide necessary amenities and facilities. therefore expand recreational/open space opportunities in the City.

Southern California Association of Governments. 2024. Connect SoCal. Available at https://scag.ca.gov/connect-socal (accessed July 2024). 43 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Applicable General Plan Goal . Policy
Land Use Goal 5 — A land use pattern that protects and
enhances residential neighborhoods.

Land Use Policy 5.1 — Consider the compatibility of
proposed projects on surrounding uses in terms of the size and configuration of buildings, use of materials and
landscaping, preservation of existing vegetation and
landform, the location of access routes, noise impacts, traffic impacts, and other environmental conditions
Noise Element
Noise Goal 2 — Minimize transfer of noise impacts
between adjacent land uses.

Noise Policy 2.1 — Limit the maximum permitted noise
levels crossing property lines and impacting adjacent land uses.

Noise Goal 3 — Minimize the impact of noise levels
throughout the community through land use planning.

Noise Policy 3.1— Enforce and maintain acceptable noise limit standards.

Noise Policy 3.4 — Evaluate potential noise conflicts for individual sites and projects, and require mitigation of all significant noise impacts as a condition of project
approval.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.

References:

June 2025
Project Consistency
Consistent: The Project is located within the Redhawk Specific Plan which provided a significant number of residential uses when it was originally implemented. As part of this Specific Plan, a golf course was designed to be a central feature within the residential communities and neighborhoods. The Project would not alter the golf course nor its intended function as a centerpiece for the surrounding residential neighborhoods.

Consistent: The Project would allow for additional types of special events which could be hosted at the Redhawk Golf Course.

Special events are already hosted at the golf course, provided they are golf related. While amplified voice and music are already allowed, and would continue to be allowed, a noise study was prepared, refer to Appendix A.

Consistent: The Project analyzed noise impacts resultant of special events hosted at the golf course and modeled noise levels at adjacent land uses. As a result, the Project would implement MM N0I-1 which would limit the transfer of noise from the Project site to adjacent land uses. This would further ensure that operations at the Project site are continued to be conducted in compliance with the City noise ordinances and standards.

California Legislative Information. 2008. SB-375 Transportation planning: travel demand models:
sustainable communities strategy: environmental review. Available at https://Ieginfo.legislature.ca.Rov/faces/bilINavClient.xhtml?bill id=200720080SB375 (accessed July 2024).
44 r7-

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

MINERAL RESOURCES

12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important X
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
12a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
12b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. According to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975, Mineral Resource Zones (MRZs) were designated based on regional or statewide importance. As such, existing land uses are not considered in classifying MRZs, so a MRZ may be classified despite already being developed for other uses even though this renders them unsuitable for mining. The State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) establishes a priority list by the following classification criteria:

MRZ-1: Areas where adequate geologic information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or that there is a small likelihood of the presence of mineral deposits.

MRZ-2a: Areas where the available geologic data shows that there are significant measured or indicated deposits present, which means this land is of prime importance in mining, or MRZ-21b: that there is an inferred likelihood of significant mineral deposits as indicated by limited sampling.
• MRZ-3a: Areas containing known mineral deposits that have moderate potential for mineral deposits and may be reclassified as MRZ-2.

MRZ-31b: Areas containing inferred mineral deposits based on plausible evidence of the geologic settings.
• MRZ-4: Areas where there is not enough geologic information available to determine the presence or absence of mineral resources. This indicated limited knowledge and it does not imply that there is a small likelihood of mineral deposits.

According to the Temecula GP Open Space/Conservation Element, the City is classified as MRZ-3a. MRZ-3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant �K 45

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
economic vaIue.18 Additionally, the Project site is not located on land that is designated for or would allow mineral extraction uses, refer to Table 17.08.030 in Temecula MC Section 17.08.030, mineral extraction or mining uses are not permitted nor are conditionally permitted. Further, the Project site is not located on the California Geological Survey's Mineral Lands Classification map.19 Further, the Project does not propose new developments and would exist wholly within previously developed existing facilities. As such, no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.

References:

California Geological Survey. 2022. CGS Information Warehouse: Mineral Land Classification. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc (accessed July 2024).

City of Temecula. 2005. City of Temecula General Plan; Page OS-21. Available at https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/287/Open-Space-Conservation-PDF?bidld= (accessed July 2024).
19 City of Temecula. 2005. City of Temecula General Plan, Page OS-21. Available at https://temecuIaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/287/Open- Space-Conservation-PDF?bidld= (accessed July 2024).
19 California Geological Survey. 2022. CGS Information Warehouse: Mineral Land Classification. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc (accessed July 2024). 46 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
NOISE
June 2025

13. NOISE. Would the project result in:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
X
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
X
groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private X
airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
A Noise Analysis was completed by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. on July 29, 2024, for the Project and is available as Appendix A to this Draft IS/MND. To determine ambient noise levels in the Project area, three 10-minute noise measurements were taken using a Larson Davis Sound Expert° LxT Sound Level Meter between 2:10 p.m. and 3:17 p.m. on June 15, 2024. Additionally, four 10-minute measurements were taken at an event at the Redhawk Golf Course which had amplified music. These measurements were taken with the same sound meter between 8:05 p.m. and 8:59 p.m. on June 15, 2024. Noise measurements Short Term-1 (ST-1), ST-2, and ST-3 were used to establish ambient noise levels.

Measurements were then taken again at these three locations and a fourth location, ST-4, closer to the amplified music. Table 4: Noise Measurements provides the noise levels measured at these locations.

Table 4: Noise Measurements
PeriodSite Location Measurement d: d:F(d;;)
Ambient Noise Measurements
End of cul-de-sac on Camino Carmargo,
2:10 p.m., Saturday,
ST-1
10 min

48.0 39.4

57.8 approximately 450 feet northwest of Pavilion.

June 15, 2024
Redhawk Golf Course parking lot,
2:41 p.m., Saturday,
ST 2
approximately 200 feet west of the Pavilion.

June 15, 2024
10 min

48.1 37.5

60.7 East of the Pavilion, across the golf course
3:17 p.m. Saturday,
ST-3
10 min

46.5 41.3

65.7 adjacent to residences along Tiburco Drive.

June 15, 2024
Event Noise Measurements
End of cul-de-sac on Camino Carmargo,
8:05 p.m., Saturday,
ST 1
approximately 450 feet northwest of Pavilion.

June 15, 2024
10 min

50.0 43.5

58.0 In Redhawk Golf Course parking lot area,
8:23 p.m., Saturday,
ST-2
10 min

50.1 45.9

56.5 approximately 200 feet west of the Pavilion.

June 15, 2024
��KP 47

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
13a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project would allow for weddings, banquets, meetings, corporate events, and other private events at the Pavilion that would produce noise from amplified music and crowd noise. Private events would be allowed any day of the week, but not more than three times per week, with all amplified music ending at 9:00 p.m. This is a reduction when compared to the currently permitted use. The DJ and speaker system are assumed to be setup in the southeastern corner of the Pavilion, based on Applicant communication. Mobile musicians (e.g., guitarist, violinist, etc.) may also perform at private events along the grass area immediately east of the Pavilion with a speaker setup in the southernmost portion of the Pavilion area. However, the mobile musicians and the DJ would perform exclusively (not concurrently), and the DJ music/speaker noise is usually the loudest. Thus, DJ music/speaker noise was conservatively modeled and analyzed in the noise analysis as a worst -case condition (Appendix A).

The primary noise sources from private events at the Pavilion are amplified music and crowd noise.

Pavilion event noise was modeled with the SouncIPLAN software. SouncIPLAN allows computer simulations of noise situations, and creates noise contour maps using reference noise levels, topography, point and area noise sources, mobile noise sources, and intervening structures.

As shown in Table 4 above, the measured noise level from the amplified music/speaker system at the Pavilion is 74.6 dBA at 140 feet (ST-4). One point source representing the DJ speaker system was modeled in SouncIPLAN in the southeastern corner of the Pavilion. The point source was oriented in a northwest direction consistent with the observed condition by Kimley-Horn on June 15, 2024. One area source representing crowd noise covering the entire Pavilion area was modeled using a reference noise level of 89 dBA at 3 feet. Refer to Appendix A for methodologies.

Event noise levels at the Pavilion would range from approximately 31.5 dBA to 64.7 dBA at the surrounding residences and would not exceed the City's 65 dBA noise standard. In addition, interior noise levels would reach a maximum of 38.7 dBA at the surrounding residential uses and would not exceed the City's 45 dBA interior noise standard, refer to Table 5: Pavilion Event Noise Levels. However, due to the variability of speaker noise levels (i.e., DJ's can set or increase speaker noise to their desired level) and the general difficulty in managing or controlling crowd noise, it is recommended the maximum noise level from amplified speakers at the Pavilion be limited to 84 dBA at a distance of 50 feet; see Mitigation Measure (MM) N0I-1. This maximum speaker noise level would ensure the surrounding residences are not exposed to noise levels above the City's noise standards.
r
48 (!ilC4 4 A'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 5: Pavilion Event Noise Levels
June 2025
Receptor IN 0. 1,2
1 L
��E"7
Single -Family Residential
Modeled
Noise Level .:A

62.8 .:

36.8 2
Single -Family Residential

61.9 35.9
3 Single -Family Residential

61.7 35.7
4 Single -Family Residential

59.2 33.2
5 Single -Family Residential

56.6 30.6
6 Single -Family Residential

59.9 33.9
7 Single -Family Residential

62.2 36.2
8 Single -Family Residential

61.5 35.5
9 Single -Family Residential

64.7 38.7
10 Single -Family Residential

61.7 35.7
11 Single -Family Residential

61.4 35.4
12 Single -Family Residential

56.4 30.4
13 Single -Family Residential

49.3 23.3
14 Single -Family Residential

50.1 24.1
15 Single -Family Residential

50.9 24.9
16 Single -Family Residential

53.0 27.0
17 Single -Family Residential

49.7 23.7
18 Single -Family Residential

51.0 25.0
19 Single -Family Residential

43.6 17.6
20 Single -Family Residential

45.4 19.4
21 Single -Family Residential

45.0 19.0
22 Single -Family Residential

44.4 18.4
23 Single -Family Residential

31.5 5.5
24 Single -Family Residential

38.5 12.5
25 Single -Family Residential

38.8 12.8
26 Single -Family Residential

39.7 13.7
27 Single -Family Residential

51.6 25.6
28 Single -Family Residential

54.1 28.1
29 Single -Family Residential

52.0 26.0
30 Single -Family Residential

49.3 23.3
31 Single -Family Residential

48.6 22.6
32 Single -Family Residential

49.8 23.8
33 Single -Family Residential

50.8 24.8
34 Single -Family Residential

53.4 27.4
35 Single -Family Residential

53.6 27.6
Notes:

1. Interior noise levels were calculated assuming an exterior -interior sound reduction of 26 dBA from standard construction practices, per Barbara Locher, et al., Differences between Outdoorand Indoor5ound Levels for Open, Tilted, and Closed Windows, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, January 2018.

2. Refer to Figure 3 of Appendix A for a map showing the locations of each receptor.

Source: SoundPLAN version 9.0. See Appendix A for noise modeling data and results.

While modeled data and measured noise levels indicate that the Project would not exceed City thresholds for noise impacts, due to the variability of amplified music, there is a possibility for noise levels to exceed these thresholds. As a result, MM NOI-1 would be implemented, and impacts would be less than significant.
49 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Mitigation Measures
June 2025
MM N0I-1 In order to comply with the City of Temecula Noise Ordinance, noise levels from amplified speakers shall be limited to a maximum of 84 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet, and the speaker location shall be limited to the southeast corner of the Pavilion. A designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall complete a noise measurement at 50 feet downstream from (or directly in front of) the amplified speakers and ensure the noise level does not exceed 84 dBA Leq. A noise meter or cellular device -based decibel meter application shall be utilized to complete the noise measurement and adjust the speaker output volume.

The speaker volume shall be adjusted to ensure that the maximum permissible noise level of 84 dBA Leq is not exceeded. The designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall maintain a logbook documenting the date and time of calibration (84 dBA at 50 feet) for each event that occurs. The designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall maintain each record for 90 days from the date of calibration. Upon request by the City of Temecula Code Enforcement, and only after the filing of a formal noise complaint by an adjacent resident, the logbook shall be provided to the City for verification. 13b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? No Impact. The Project does not propose construction activities or alterations to existing operations which would generate groundborne vibration or noise. Noise generated as a result of the Project would propagate through the air from amplified speakers. As the Project would not generate groundborne vibrations, no impact would occur.
13c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. As previously mentioned in Impact 9e, the nearest airport to the Project site is the French Valley Airport, located approximately 6.7 miles northwest. Additionally, the Project site is not located within the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan. As such, no impact would occur.

References:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2024. Redhawk Golf Course Private Event Center— Temecula, CA —Noise Analysis.
r
50 (!ilC4 4 A'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

POPULATION AND HOUSING

14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an X
area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
X
housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
14a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
14b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As special events are currently hosted at the Redhawk Golf Course, additional employees would not be required, and the Project would not otherwise encourage population growth within the City. The Project would not displace a substantial number of existing people or housing, as the Project would not construct new facilities nor alter operational characteristics such that existing housing would be demolished or relocated.

As such, no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.
�K 51

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

PUBLIC SERVICES

15. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i) Fire protection?
X
ii) Police protection?
X
iii) Schools?
X
iv) Parks?
X
v) Other public facilities?
X
15a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
i) Fire protection?
No Impact. The Temecula Fire Department is comprised of 1 Division Chief, 2 Battalion Chiefs and 60 firefighting personnel that serve from 5 fire stations located within the City limits. Plan review and inspection services for development and construction throughout the City is provided by 6 Fire Prevention staff members located at City Hall. There are 3 Administrative staff members that provide support for the implementation and management of the Temecula Fire Department. The Temecula Division encompasses 3 Riverside County Fire Department stations for a total of 8 stations within the Temecula Division. The Temecula Fire Department fire engines are all 4-person staffed paramedic assessment engines which ensures a minimum of 1 Paramedic and 3 EMT level personnel at the scene of all emergencies.20 There are four fire stations within 2.5 miles of the Project site. Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) Station 92, RCFD Station 84, Pechanga Fire Station 2, and Pechanga Fire Station 1. While the Pechanga fire stations are located outside the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Fire Department (PFD) utilizes RCFD 21 City of Temecula. 2024. Temecula Fire Department. Available at https://temeculaca.gov/230/Fire (accessed July 2024). 52 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
dispatch and communication services and would respond to fire incidents and other emergencies at the Project site under the Fire Service and Rescue Emergency Mutual Aid Program. RCFD Station 92 is the closest to the Project site and would likely be the first station dispatched to service calls generated at the Project site.

The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. This would not cause changes to the frequency of events, total number of events (on a daily basis), or cause an increase in the number of people which could attend an event (on a daily basis). As the Project site is currently adequately served by fire protection services, and the Project would not make substantive changes to the Redhawk Golf Course or its operations, the site would continue to be adequately served by fire protection services and no impact would occur.
ii) Police protection?
No Impact. The City of Temecula contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department (RCSD) for police services and staffs the Temecula Police Department (TPD). RCSD handles all criminal matters in unincorporated areas and provides incarceration facilities for all offenders. The RCSD employs officers at the rate of about 1 Officer per 1,063 residents (approximately 110 officers). In addition to the main station, there are two substations available to the public for police services at the Promenade Mall Substation, and a second location in Old Town. The RCSD has a Promenade Mall Team, Traffic Team, Investigation Bureau, SET/Gang team, Community Outreach Resource Engagement (CORE) team, and a Metro Team."
There are three stations utilized by the RCSD/TPD, the Southwest Station (30755-A Auld Road, Murrieta), the Old Town Station (28690 Mercedes Street, Suite 102, Temecula), and the Promenade Station at the Promenade Mall (40820 Winchester Road, Suite 2020, Temecula). The nearest station is the Old Town Station, located approximately 3.56 miles northwest of the Project site. However, officers responding to incidents requiring police services are often dispatched from patrols and are not always located at the stations on standby. As previously discussed, the Project would not add to the City's population and would not require the City to hire additional officers to maintain their current ratio of officers to residents.

Further, the Project site is currently adequately served by police services and would continue to be adequately served by police services after implementation. As such, no impact would occur. iii) Schools?
No Impact. The Project does not propose the development of residential land uses, nor would it substantially increase the population of the City. As such, there would not be any increased demands on schools within the City. No impact would occur.
zi City of Temecula. 2024. Temecula Police Department. Available at https://temeculaca.aov/196/Police (accessed July 2024). 53 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
iv) Parks?
No Impact. Refer to Section 16: Recreation below.
15b) Other public facilities?
June 2025
No Impact. The Project would not result in or induce significant population growth because the Project does not propose substantial unplanned growth of population within the City or any specific development; therefore, the Project would have no impact to other public facilities.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.

References:

City of Temecula. 2024. Temecula Fire Department. Available at https://temeculaca.gov/230/Fire (accessed July 2024).

City of Temecula. 2024. Temecula Police Department. Available at https://temeculaca.gov/196/Police (accessed July 2024).
r
54 (!9lCK 4 A'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

RECREATION

16. RECREATION. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
X
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require X
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
16a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
16b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. This would not cause changes to the frequency of events or total number of events (on a daily basis). The Redhawk Golf Course itself provides recreational areas and activities for the City and region. As the Project would not increase population of the City there would not be an increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of said facilities would occur or be accelerated through the increased use of those facilities. Further, no new construction or development would occur as a result of the Project and would therefore not cause an adverse physical effect on the environment through the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. No impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.
�K 55

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

TRANSPORTATION
June 2025

17. TRANSPORTATION. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy
X
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CECIA X
Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design X
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
X
A Traffic Memorandum was prepared for the Project by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. on July 3, 2024, and is available as Appendix B to this Draft IS/MND.
17a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines provide a standard format and methodology for assessing potential effects on traffic and circulation from proposed developments, specifically regarding their consistency with the Temecula GP. There are several exemptions for Projects requiring the preparation of a GP Consistency Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) under the assumption that the Project would be consistent with the Temecula GP or for other reasons.

Development projects that are exempt from the preparation of a GP Consistency TIA are:

Residential Parcel Maps.

Multi -Family Residential Projects with less than fifty (50) units.

Development Projects of One (1) Acre or less.

Preschools, Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, and High Schools. • Community Centers, Community Parks, Lodges, Neighborhood Parks, and Religious Facilities. • Congregate Care Facilities that contain significant special services, such as medical facilities, dining facilities, recreation facilities and support retail facilities. • Any use which can demonstrate, based on the most recent edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), a trip generation of less than 100 vehicle trips during each peak hour.
r1, ` 56
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
According to the Project's Traffic Memorandum, the Project would not generate new trips as the Project uses would be similar to those that currently exist on the Project site. According to Table 1 of Appendix B, the special events at the Redhawk Golf Course could generate 86 trips in the evening peak hour. As the Project would generate fewer than 100 peak hour trips, the Project is exempt from the preparation of a GP Consistency TIA and is assumed to be consistent with the Temecula GP. Again, it should be noted that the Project would not add 86 new trips to the evening peak hour; rather, these trips already could occur as a result of the special events that are currently permitted at the Redhawk Golf Course.

The Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) provide bus services within the City of Temecula. The nearest stop for this route is located at the intersection of Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch Parkway, at the driveway entrance to the Project site and approximately 0.32 miles from the Pavilion. RTA Route 24 has a stop at this location. The Project would not include construction or other development which could disrupt transit service at this location. As such, the Project would not conflict with a policy plan regarding transit, nor would it impact existing transit in the City.

The Temecula GP Circulation Element identifies several Class 2 Bicycle routes and multi -use trails in the vicinity of the Project, however only the Class 2 Bicycle route along Vail Ranch Parkway and Redhawk Parkway, surrounding the Project site, have been implemented since the preparation of the Temecula GP.

The Project would not impact the implementation of the Temecula GP Circulation Plan as no development or construction would occur which would alter any existing bicycle or pedestrian access nor prevent future implementation of bicycle or pedestrian facilities.

As the Project would not conflict with a plan, policy, or ordinance addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary.
17b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Less than Significant Impact. SB 743 was approved by the California legislature in September 2013. SB 743 required changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), specifically directing the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop alternative metrics to the use of vehicular level of service (LOS) for evaluating transportation projects. The CEQA Guidelines were updated such that Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) replaced LOS as the primary measure of transportation impacts. OPR's Technical Advisory suggests that the City may screen out VMT impact using project size, maps, transit availability, and provision of affordable housing to quickly identify when a project should be expected to cause a less -than significant impact without conducting a detailed study. The City of Temecula has published the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (May 2020) as recommended guidelines for analyzing transportation impacts of proposed projects. The City provides screening criteria for CEQA VMT analyses for land use projects which consist of seven total criteria. These criteria are:

1. Small residential and employment projects
o Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips (trips are based on the number of vehicle trips after any alternative modes/location-based adjustments are applied) rca 57

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

2. Projects located near a major transit stop/high quality transit corridor o Projects located within a half mile of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high -quality transit corridor may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.22 This presumption may not be appropriate if the project:
■ Has a Floor Area Ratio of less than 0.75.
■ Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the City.
■ Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high - income residential units.

3. Projects located in a VMT efficient area
o A VMT efficient area is any area with an average VMT per service population 15% below the baseline average for the WRCOG region. Land use projects may qualify for the use of VMT efficient area screening if the project can be reasonably expected to generate VMT per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the VMT efficient area. Projects located within a VMT efficient area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

4. Locally serving retail projects
o Local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel.

5. Locally serving public utilities
o Public facilities that serve the surrounding community or public facilities that are passive use may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

6. Redevelopment projects with greater VMT efficiency
o A redevelopment project may be presumed to have a less than significant impact if the proposed project's total project VMT is less than the existing land use's total VMT. zz Major transit stops: a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. High quality transit corridor: a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute periods.
�K 58

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

7. Affordable housing
o An affordable housing project may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

Based on the VMT screening criteria and the assumed trips generated as a result of hosting additional types of events at the Pavilion, the Project would meet criterion one as a small residential and employment project as it would not generate or add new trips in excess of 110 daily trips. Refer to Table 1 of Appendix B. As previously discussed, the Project is consistent with the existing operations of the golf course special events and Project related traffic would be similar to the existing conditions. Therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in daily traffic or VMT at the Redhawk Golf Course. Further, some portion of special event guests may carpool or use ride share services at a greater rate than what has been assumed for the Traffic Memorandum, which would have a further VMT reducing effect. Therefore, the Project would not cause a significant impact with respect to VMT. A less than significant impact would occur.
17c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or new development or construction; rather, the Project proposes to allow additional types of special events than what are currently allowed. These new events would be operated similarly to those that are currently hosted at the Redhawk Golf Course.

Therefore, the Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses.
17d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The Project would not alter the existing driveways which currently provide emergency access to the Project site. There would not be other alterations to the Project site or Redhawk Golf Course as a result of the Project. Therefore, the Project would not result in inadequate emergency access and no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.

References:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2024. Traffic Memorandum for the Proposed Redhawk Specific Plan Amendment Project in the City of Temecula.
r
59 (!ilC4 4 A'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
June 2025

18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register X
of Historical Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public Resources
Code section 5020.1(k)?
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
X
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American Tribe?
Assembly Bill 52
On August 28, 2023, the City initiated tribal consultation with interested California Native American tribes consistent with AB 52. The City requested consultation from the following tribes which have previously requested consultation: Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (Agua Caliente), Pechanga Band of Indians (Pechanga), Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians (Rincon), Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians (Soboba), and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians (Torres). The City received responses from Agua Caliente, Rincon, and Pechanga. Neither Soboba nor Torres responded to the City's request for consultation.

Agua Caliente concluded consultation with the City on November 15, 2023, stating that the Project is not located within the Tribe's Traditional Use Area (TUA) and therefore deferred to other tribes in the area.

Rincon concluded consultation with the City on July 30, 2024, stating that the Project is within the TUA of the Luiseno people and within Rincon's specific area of Historic interest. However, Rincon had no further comments or concerns regarding the Project. Pechanga initially responded to requests for consultation on September 29, 2023, stating that the Project is located within Luiseno territory. Pechanga concluded consultation with the City on July 30, 2024, stating that as the Project had no ground disturbing activities, they had no further comments.
r1, 60
(!i,C4 r7

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
Senate Bill 18
On November 3, 2023, the City initiated tribal consultation with interested California Native American tribes consistent with SB 18. The City requested consultation from the following tribes: Soboba, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians (Santa Rosa), San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians (San Luis Rey), Rincon, Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (Quechan), Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians (Pauma), Pala Band of Mission Indians (Pala), La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians (La Jolla), Juaneno Band of Mission Indians, Agua Caliente, and Pechanga. Only Pechanga responded.

Pechenga concluded consultation with the City on July 30, 2024, stating that since the Project proposed no ground disturbing activities, they had no comments or questions. 18a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k) ?
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Less than Significant Impact. Pursuant to CGC Section 21080.3.2(b) and Section 21074(a)(1)(A)-(B) (AB 52) the City has provided formal notification to California Native American tribal representatives that have previously requested notification from the City regarding projects within the geographic area traditionally and culturally affiliated with tribe(s). Native American groups may have critical knowledge of local cultural resources in the regional vicinity and may have concerns about adverse effects from development on tribal cultural resources as defined in PRC Section 21074.

As noted above, the City commenced tribal notification in accordance with AB 52 on August 28, 2023.

Tribal consultation was concluded on July 30, 2024. All tribes noted that they had no further comments or questions and did not request the implementation of mitigation measures. As such, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. Further, as noted above, the City commenced tribal consultation pursuant to SB 18 on November 3, 2023. SB 18 consultation was concluded on July 30, 2024, as the consulting tribes that responded did not have comments or questions on the Project. The Project would not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, and therefore impacts to tribal cultural resources would not occur. Impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is necessary.
�Kl, 61

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Unless
Less Than

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new X
or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm
water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X
project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, X
or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and X
reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? 19a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
19b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? 19c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
19d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? 62 Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
19e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No Impact. As previously mentioned, the Project site is currently developed with the Redhawk Golf Course and is adequately served by all utilities. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing routine operations of the Redhawk Golf Course. However, beyond allowing for additional types of events, the Project would reduce the total number of events permitted and maximum number of guests. As such, there would be no operational changes which would require the upsizing or improvement of existing utilities. There would be no significant environmental effects related to relocation or construction of new utilities.

Further, the Project would not increase the frequency at which events could occur at the Project site (on a daily basis) and would not increase the demand for water, wastewater services, increase the rate at which solid waste is generated, nor would change operations at the Project site which would cause the Redhawk Golf Course to fall out of compliance with existing local, state, and federal regulations. As such, no impacts would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.
r
63 (!9lCK 4 A'

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

WILDFIRE

20. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan X
or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
X
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated X
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including X
downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
The Project site is not located within a State Responsibility Area (SRA) nor is it designated as a very high fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ) as determined by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE)."
20a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula prepared and adopted an emergency operations plan (EOP) in 2023 to improve the emergency preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation efforts of the City of Temecula. The EOP identifies components of the City's emergency management organization within the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The EOP describes the duties of the federal, state, and county entities for protecting life and property and overall well-being, and coordinates response roles which must be defined by these organizations to facilitate the ability to respond to any given incident, therefore, the EOP meets the requirements of NIMS for the purpose of emergency management and the Project would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Further, the Project site would be adequately served by fire and police protection services. 13 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2024. Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Available at https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we- do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard-severity-zones (accessed July 2024). i 64

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
The Project would not require any road closures or cause additional impacts to the circulation network than those that would have occurred as a result of the implementation of the Redhawk Specific Plan and Golf Course. Further, the Project proposes expanding the types of special events which could be hosted at the Redhawk Golf Course but would make no other operational modifications to the Golf Course. The Project would continue to operate in a manner that is consistent with the existing uses at the Project site.

As such, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required. 20b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
20c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? 20d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. The Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. The Project proposes a specific plan amendment and conditional use permit which would expand the allowed event types at the existing Pavilion located at the Redhawk Golf Course. Furthermore, the Project does not propose alterations to the existing operations of the Redhawk Golf Course beyond allowing for additional types of events. The Project site is not located in an area of the City which has significant slopes, nor is the Project located in an area that is mapped in a wind hazard area according to the Temecula GP Public Safety Element. Further, as previously discussed, the Project site is not located in an SRA nor is located within a VHFHSZ. Overall, the risk of wildfire is low atthe Project site and Project implementation would not increase the risk of wildfire. As the Project would not increase the risk of wildfire at the Redhawk Golf Course, no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are necessary.

References:

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2024. Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Available at https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire- hazard-severity-zones (accessed July 2024).
��KP 65

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025

MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE

21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project:

Potentially
Significant

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Potentially
Significant
unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
No
Issues
Issues
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of X
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
X
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will X
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
21a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
No Impact. All impacts to the environment, including impacts to fish and wildlife habitats, fish and wildlife populations, plant and animal communities, rare and endangered plants and animals, and historical and pre -historical resources were evaluated as part of this Draft IS/MND. The Project site is surrounded by existing development and is currently developed. The Project site contains ornamental landscaping which is maintained on a regular basis. Further, the Project does not propose any grading or the development of new structures, nor does it propose the alterations of an existing structure. Operational changes consist of expanding the types of special events which could be hosted at the Redhawk Golf Course and do not represent changes which would affect the quality of the environment. As such, the Project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment and no impact would occur. �K 66

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2025
21b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less than Significant Impact. As discussed throughout this Draft IS/MND, implementation of the Project has the potential to result in effects to the environment that are individually limited and may be cumulatively considerable in specific areas. In the only instance where the Project has the potential to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact to the environment, a mitigation measures has been imposed to reduce potential effects to less than significant levels. The Project is not considered growth - inducing, as defined by State CEQA Guidelines. The potential cumulative environmental effects of implementing the Project would be less than considerable and therefore, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard.
21c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project's potential to result in environmental effects that could adversely affect human beings, either directly or indirectly, has been discussed throughout this Draft IS/MND. There would be no construction as a result of the Project.

Operation of the Project would not involve any activities that would result in environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. However, related to noise impacts, in order to ensure less than significant impacts would occur, MM NOI-1 is required to ensure compliance with the City noise ordinance. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard.

Significant Impacts
No significant impacts have been identified that could not be reduced to less than significant levels with the incorporation of mitigation measures.
�Kl, 67

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
Appendix A
Noise Analysis
(!9lCK A'

Kimley»>Horn

MEMORANDUM
To: Eric Jones, Associate Planner II, City of Temecula
From: Ryan Chiene, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Date: July 18, 2024
Subject: Redhawk Golf Course Private Event Center —Temecula, CA— Noise Analysis Purpose
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify the noise impacts associated with operation of the proposed Redhawk Golf Course Private Event Center Project (project), located in the City of Temecula, California.

Project Location
The project site is located at Redhawk Golf Course in the southern portion of the City of Temecula (City). The Redhawk Golf Course is generally situated east of Interstate 15 (1-15), south of California State Road 79 (SR-79), and south of the intersection of Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch Parkway.

The site is specifically located at the Outdoor Pavilion area north of the clubhouse, east of the surface parking lot, and west of the driving range. Single-family residential uses surround the project site at various distances in all directions. The nearest residences are located approximately 300 feet to the west along Via Jaca. See Exhibit 1: Local Vicinity Map for the more details.

Project Description
The existing Pavilion is currently permitted to host outdoor golf -related events such as tournaments and award ceremonies. The project applicant is seeking the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) that would allow for additional events such as weddings, banquets, meetings, corporate events, and other private events at the Pavilion. No new structures are proposed or would be developed as part of the Project.

The CUP does not propose changes to the existing hours of operations, lighting, or parking of the Pavilion. Private events would be allowed seven days per week, no more than four times per week.

Events would be allowed from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. with all amplified noise ending at 9:45 p.m.

Amplified noise would be located on the southeastern corner of the Pavilion. The CUP would allow an approximate maximum of 130 guests. Refer to Exhibit 2: Conditional Use Permit Site Plan for information related to the Pavilion and proposed tenant improvements.

-� 11 Col.� � • ■� Y 31 - r :•.� ' '.�Sr• ��-�.v. ,� ..�� • .ter 9 re
ao�,� ^s+y;�• „; _ Redha k If R r52 R• �• s '�`
Hawk ase ��- I y �.� � , '� � •, .r �F+�` �,� �� ' 5u;rlrk!• r Ravilivn ' ,' ti '�1��.' �� ,
Project Locatk M '*Rol
AllVol
a��ey' r . �, {�f ► _ d�� >s� Red Hawk Gnlf
4t
lit
+LDS /A 1 i i �� c . r ,.11r x ! �' r' . • r
r r I
kimley-horn.com 1 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Kimley >>> Horn
Exhibit 2: Conditional Permit Use Site Plan

Page 3 ends

J,
�\y f
..
-At
r
R
ti�i•
..
' • R ArTAAAr Ar4i
,
MR.rwr
'""'
• eI
rA
Ru
R...;:
4 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS
d
NOTE:

UTILITIES:

R7w---&%xw I ULF*bu moan
IF r•6r
ar MUFAM c\lp W
IRE7-W FINOI
_
cTR1r w YICTrlI
DATA TABLE:
-in `NIsAi
EASEMENT NOTES:
_
siTtR ar,oa1 wAcrasp ESTAK:

EASCO T rar EITK+ n WM Rail I.M. 0MArS 4 JOVOKAM
�T
h ' •
TOOa iQAyrr rlAnlra
1[ui Ddarn[rt rlrry T OF rx •c :wT r1R
6UIL DI NG SU MM ANY:

AOI6ITI[S Mp tWIt MAA �. IN rAMt W 9DAHM
.' .' .

Itr.: oouwMnt v.•r
RIa1IM1 rcr i.l, rrAT1a mltc.
:,sre s r.
crlrcrrrlt i9I W1 oorAM+, Ix I/6T,.AOR KaoRpm rlTRRMr xs, tan As I�6fAAOR w. rT�nA a arxlAi KCOrts p' rlwlsseE pOurrr. r glnw M .0 D[sT�Aro,e 09
rvsaw �rt W. W cNnrE
ox.A•.rn e
w I�mon rQ r[ .Pc it we lnc norm A :M:IcnRAt
Qpwll
- R Y
Tn % tp1_T.lol 1pi rooD fRM[
MovD'.i0 LW � .[. fir MM IMN a � v A All F..'M ro r rr[ •'a�v:r.c.[16 , IM rays Cr ALlI O "Va1A KrQ 01 SIR 4Cl. A H11t
Q•
K.T11[ rtNrT mm7
.AAeu Cr S:.R 1
CpIR)RAI la, I* lMtftMM KCOM JMWrr 94. IMI u 11RISRGR
b.�>9Q Y wrl Cl>L PI w RIIOISIDE WkWT. GLIrmta. SAID
Q�J7
KW. Oras'- MF1. 306772 Sr. R1A Ate[;
9V IEr Jltl' ]%,hS 31. R1r X?Z:
�Io.T �'
C0D M f51W ■1■Q11C d ■MMIrEy. TOX1 V fl" tWIMOAL
,_ \\
�' L
yyyy A `i.

TOtAL r rxc+n ARC 17,rtr W. y A
Lot a wx
C1i5111i sru ,.qr.
l'A1a x:
:. 70 3 f
MRUTPrI1Ct1, co V[0,45 AND SrWA'hNt$ III. oMp, Vm, V1'M.

K- - -*a AND hQI At rr,AA ftvwr 11"to IN INC [Kara
a RIIP61tt• STAT" a Mir"NIA
[ATSA1r6 ru1pMG 1]}Ir w,
RK10RAWAMfM AREA tnrq w 7.. rrwn.
an
a,.ax
r.r rlrrcr or A oilrt w [a:mrr *0 MINTPOI 01109 rrs
rpororrrrc +uA 1rAaq
r1K 9rRUN.CiG
[aovTm n ♦ F A�rlaw [{vRwll[AT *%64M MD J.M. Fel"I
I
E
rAw DnTr
Sn}16. 1
.t 1tM: '3
oorMrr ICCMM a 15. law As IMTKIllm M- W"07 cr
6r tc IAL K07G6 6 vn051[S GO,I1rr- Ca [MIN[L. SAID [�YIOtr IS F
PARKING CALCULATIONS:
tr III to OW INA:

M ; r
rur v1q ra[I1t, AAA INIpRIC; atp aCKs� rur wEs.
'
8'�GGfMtT: 6
LEGEND
•• ��.
1R LLKVQLE AWA 2.170 IS. - 1 7wJ2ow
DACES
T,K W ob6TR,. iT roam FFI
,O rlic Y'R1frim
1 KOUIMID 11
QrSTp m 1
o(rOIrIo1.� i.Q rPYlr p1LYRT
p'Y
f
R OA1,�
mAer Kwily MTErr 0�9 Sf. - 1 7rrR1A6 s.■,
KWIML 7RMS n
•Clar
nurW
.,TOO x.r.
nW 'D.r
IfTI►A1n a TlwKt
+ nla/rw 10• ►MrTIi iI9r1
oar rEw :,rrD sr. • T raerrxn s.r.
61"Trm
NO IL s 9*14 rlpi rDro nlMr
110 IL 'it yRr.a.[Rs�
w� o< sTerlEs 1
nrsrrw rAsarr. rAu
KWIgT) &PM3M M
-cii.Tw
n 1S1 i»A ry Mn
r1T:M rAVILIM
AST MCA Saw a'11 1 raitlJD S.r.

DISTIM MVILIM
000ANFc, AS
3,200 s.r.
rr IS1 IAA LANWAAK
ACpyIAEO 3PACM vv
rT■[ w t HwrlO[ fib
M rIr[ NANCH .ER3
R rIII .nrRMrr
TaTAL Kw;.m v L T.1
M IL NAw M IIIII no
1Np or ssorl[i 1
1[1110R: M-
{y UM6CA1[
K5r raolr
AD- SRACM IMMIM 3
p• [r ISTl/q
aDA WYa$ rrrorl IM 5
M'A'
1]-Trr sx,
►.M rLooR AKA RAI 10

Kimley»>Horn
Noise Background

Page 4 ends

Sound is technically described in terms of amplitude (loudness) and frequency (pitch). The standard unit of sound amplitude measurement is the decibel (dB). The decibel scale is a logarithmic scale that describes the physical intensity of the pressure vibrations that make up any sound. The pitch of the sound is related to the frequency of the pressure vibration. Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to a given sound level at all frequencies, a special frequency -dependent rating scale has been devised to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A -weighted decibel scale (dBA) provides this compensation by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear.

Noise, on the other hand, is typically defined as unwanted sound. A typical noise environment consists of a base of steady ambient noise that is the sum of various distant and indistinguishable noise sources. Superimposed on this background noise is the sound from individual local sources. These can varyfrom an occasional aircraft or train passing by to virtually continuous noise from traffic on a major highway.

Several rating scales have been developed to analyze the adverse effect of community noise on people. Since environmental noise fluctuates over time, these scales consider that the effect of noise on people is largely dependent on the total acoustical energy content of the noise as well as the time of day when the noise occurs. For example, the equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) is the average acoustic energy for a stated period of time; thus, the Leq of a time -varying noise and that of a steady noise are the same if they deliver the same acoustic energy to the ear during exposure. The Day -Night Sound level (Ldn) is a 24-hour average Leq with a 10 dBA "weighting" added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the nighttime. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is a 24-hour average Leq with a 10-dBA weighting added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and an additional 5 dBA weighting during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the evening and nighttime.

Kimley>Morn Page
Regulatory Setting
State
California Government Code
California Government Code Section 65302(f) mandates that the legislative body of each county and city adopt a noise element as part of its comprehensive general plan. The local noise element must recognize the land use compatibility guidelines established by the State Department of Health Services. The guidelines rank noise land use compatibility in terms of "normally acceptable", "conditionally acceptable", "normally unacceptable", and "clearly unacceptable" noise levels for various land use types. Single-family homes are "normally acceptable" in exterior noise environments up to 60 CNEL and "conditionally acceptable" up to 70 CNEL. Multiple -family residential uses are "normally acceptable" up to 65 CNEL and "conditionally acceptable" up to 70 CNEL. Schools, libraries, and churches are "normally acceptable" up to 70 CNEL, as are office buildings and business, commercial, and professional uses.

Title 24 — Building Code
The State's noise insulation standards are codified in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24: Part 1, Building Standards Administrative Code, and Part 2, California Building Code. These noise standards are applied to new construction in California for interior noise compatibility from exterior noise sources. The regulations specify that acoustical studies must be prepared when noise -sensitive structures, such as residential buildings, schools, or hospitals, are located near major transportation noise sources, and where such noise sources create an exterior noise level of 65 dBA CNEL or higher.

Acoustical studies that accompany building plans must demonstrate that the structure has been designed to limit interior noise in habitable rooms to acceptable noise levels. For new multi -family residential buildings, the acceptable interior noise limit for new construction is 45 dBA CNEL.

Local
City of Temecula General Plan
The City of Temecula General Plan Noise Element (Noise Element) identifies noise -sensitive land uses and noise sources, defines areas of noise impact, and contains policies and programs to achieve and maintain noise levels compatible with various types of land uses. The element addresses noise which affects the community at large, rather than noise associated with site -specific conditions.

The Noise Element identifies land use guidelines to protect residential neighborhoods and noise - sensitive receptors such as schools and hospitals from potentially harmful noise sources. The noise standards for various land uses in the City are shown in Table 1: Temecula Land Use Noise Standards.

Kimley»>Horn

Page 6 ends

Table 1: Temecula Land Use Noise Standards
Property Receiving Noise
Maximum Noise Level (Ld„ or CNEL, dBA)
Type and Use
Land Use Designation
Interior
Exterior3
Hillside
Rural
Very Low
45 65
Residential
Low
Low Medium
Medium
45 65/701
High
45 701
Neighborhood
Community
70 Commercial and Office
Highway Tourist
Service
Professional Office
50 70
Light Industrial
Industrial Park
55 75
Public/Institutional
Schools
50 65
All others
50 70
Vineyards/Agriculture
-
70 Open Space
Open Space
70/652

1. Maximum exterior noise levels up to 70 dB CNEL are allowed for Multiple -Family Housing.

2. Where quiet is a basis required for the land use.

3. Regarding aircraft -related noise, the maximum acceptable exposure for new residential development is 60 dB CNEL.

Source: City of Temecula, Noise Element, 2005.

City of Temecula Municipal Code
The following sections of the Temecula Municipal Code (TMC) are applicable to the proposed project.

Section 9.20.040 General Sound Level Standards
No person shall create any sound, or allow the creation of any sound, on any property that causes the exterior sound level on any other occupied property to exceed the sound level standards set forth in Tables N-1 (see Table 1 above) and N-2.

Section 9.20.060(C) Special Sound Sources Standards
The general sound level standards set forth in Section 9.20.040 of this chapter apply to sound emanating from all sources, including the following special sound sources, and the person creating or allowing the creation of the sound is subject to the requirements of that section. The following special sound sources are also subject to the following additional standards. Failure to comply will constitute separate violations of this ordinance.

Kimley»>Horn
C. Sound Amplifying Equipment or Live Music

Page 7 ends

It is unlawful for any person to cause, allow or permit the emission or transmission of any loud and raucous noise from any sound -making, sound -amplifying device or live music under his control or in his possession:

Upon any private property;
Upon any public street, alley, sidewalk or thoroughfare; In or upon any public park or other public place or property.

The words "loud and raucous noise," as used in this section, shall mean any sound having such intensity or carrying power as to unreasonably interfere with the peace and quiet of other persons, or as to unreasonably annoy, disturb, impair or endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of other persons.

3. The determination of whether a sound is "unreasonable," as used in subsection (C)(2) of this section, shall involve the consideration of the level of noise, duration of noise, constancy or intermittency of noise, time of day or night, place, proximity to sensitive receptors, nature and circumstances of the emission or transmission of any such loud and raucous noise.

Existing Setting
Existing noise levels at the project site and the nearest residential uses are primarily impacted by roadway traffic, parking lot activity, and stationary (e.g., mechanical equipment) noise sources.

Redhawk Parkway is located approximately 900 feet west of the project site is the primary source of traffic noise in the project vicinity. Parking lot activity immediately to the west and mechanical equipment (e.g., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] equipment) at the clubhouse and other Redhawk Golf Course buildings to the east are also noise sources that affect the existing noise environment. Other ancillary noise sources in the project vicinity include golf course patrons talking, the use of car radios, and golf cart movements/activity. The noise associated with these sources may represent a single -event noise occurrence or short-term noise.

It is also noted that golf -related events currently occur at the Pavilion and are the primary noise source during their operation. Such events typically include amplified music, speeches, and gathering of large crowds that generate noise.

Kimley»>Horn
Noise Measurements
To quantify existing ambient noise levels in the project area and obtain reference noise levels for event speaker noise at the Pavilion, Kimley-Horn conducted seven short-term (10-minute) measurements on June 15, 2024; see Appendix A: Noise Data. Three noise measurements were taken to obtain existing ambient noise levels without Pavilion events, and four noise measurements were taken during a private event to obtain reference levels for speaker noise and see the effect of Pavilion events at the nearest residential uses. The 10-minute measurements were taken between 2:10 p.m. and 9:10 p.m. The DJ was positioned in the southeastern corner of the Pavilion with two speakers approximately six feet aboveground and oriented to the northwest. The noise level data for each noise measurement is listed in Table 2: Existing Noise Measurements and the noise measurement locations are shown on Exhibit 3: Noise Measurement Locations.

Table 2: Existing Noise Measurements
Measurement
Leq
Lmin
Lmax
Site
Location
Period
Duration
(dBA),
(dBA)
(dBA)
Ambient Noise Measurements
End of cul-de-sac on Camino Carmargo,
2:10 p.m., Saturday,
ST-1
10 min

48.0 39.4

57.8 approximately 450 feet northwest of Pavilion.

June 15, 2024
Redhawk Golf Course parking lot, approximately
2:41 p.m., Saturday,
ST 2
200 feet west of the Pavilion.

June 15, 2024
10 min

48.1 37.5

60.7 East of the Pavilion, across the golf course
3:17 p.m. Saturday,
ST 3
adjacent to residences along Tiburco Drive.

June 15, 2024
10 min

46.5 41.3

65.7 Event Noise Measurements
End of cul-de-sac on Camino Carmargo,
8:05 p.m., Saturday,
ST-1
10 min

50.0 43.5

58.0 approximately 450 feet northwest of Pavilion.

June 15, 2024
In Redhawk Golf Course parking lot area,
8:23 p.m., Saturday,
ST-2
approximately 200 feet west of the Pavilion.

June 15, 2024
10 min

50.1 45.9

56.5 East of the Pavilion, across the golf course
8:41 p.m., Saturday,
ST 3
adjacent to residences along Tiburco Drive.

June 15, 2024
10 min

48.7 43.0

55.1 End of drive aisle in the northern portion of
8:59 p.m., Saturday,
ST-4
Pavilion area, approximately 140 feet from the
10 min

74.6 66.0

80.8 DJ speakers/area.

June 15, 2024
Source: Noise measurements taken by Kimley-Horn and Associates, June 15, 2024. See Appendix A for noise measurement results.

Sensitive Receptors
Noise exposure standards and guidelines for various types of land uses reflect the varying noise sensitivities associated with each of these uses. Residences, hospitals, schools, guest lodging, libraries, and churches are treated as the most sensitive to noise intrusion and therefore have more stringent noise exposure targets than do other uses, such as manufacturing or agricultural uses that are not subject to impacts such as sleep disturbance. Sensitive receptors near the project site are shown in Table 3: Sensitive Receptors.

Kimley»>Horn

Page 9 ends

Table 3: Sensitive Receptors
Receptor Description
Distance and Direction from the Project
Single -Family Residences
300 feet to the west
Single -Family Residences
350 feet to the southwest
Single -Family Residences
450 feet to the southeast
Single -Family Residences
kS.7u7rce7Google
835 feet to the east
Earth, 2024.

Noise Impact Analysis
The project would allow for weddings, banquets, meetings, corporate events, and other private events at the Pavilion that would produce noise from amplified music and crowd noise. Private events would be allowed seven days per week (no more than four times per week) with all amplified music ending at 9:45 p.m. The DJ and speaker system would be setup in the southeastern corner of the Pavilion as indicated in Exhibit 2. Mobile musicians (e.g., guitarist, violinist, etc.) may also perform at private events along the grass area immediately east of the Pavilion with a speaker setup in the southernmost portion of the Pavilion area. However, the mobile musicians and the DJ would perform exclusively and the DJ music/speaker noise is usually the loudest.' Thus, DJ music/speaker noise was conservatively modeled and analyzed in this analysis as a worse -case condition.

The primary noise sources from private events at the Pavilion are amplified music and crowd noise.

Pavilion event noise was modeled with the SoundPLAN software. SounclPLAN allows computer simulations of noise situations, and creates noise contour maps using reference noise levels, topography, point and area noise sources, mobile noise sources, and intervening structures.

As shown in Table 2, the measured noise level from the amplified music/speaker system at the Pavilion is 74.6 dBA at 140 feet. One point source representing the DJ speaker system was modeled in SoundPLAN in the southeastern corner of the Pavilion. The point source was oriented in a northwest direction consistent with the observed condition by Kimley-Horn on June 15, 2025. One area source representing crowd noise covering the entire Pavilion area was modeled using a reference noise level of 89 dBA at 3 feet.2, 3
1 Per e-mail coordination with the project applicant on May 15, 2024. z Elliott H. Berger, Rick Neitzel, and Cynthia A. Kladden, Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1706 Measurement Values, 2015.
3 It is noted the crowd noise level modeled in Sound PLAN (89 dBA at 3 feet) is most representative for weddings and other large gatherings/events that would be allowed as part of the CUP. The measured event noise levels obtained by Kimley- Horn on June 15, 2024, did not include a large or "loud" crowd and was not identified as a primary noise source.

3 ;i• : • f � � ti�
i
Camino Santiago � P
Jt
ANY
Mot
�
Mk
4- EGEND:
ram. .• y �. •�. ,i •,�
Short• •
kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Kimley>>) Horn Page 11
Inputs to the SouncIPLAN model also included existing elevations and topography, ground surfaces, walls, and the surrounding residences and Redhawk Golf Course buildings/structures to best represent acoustic conditions at the project site and surrounding area. A total of 35 receivers were modeled to analyze single -point noise levels at the surrounding residences. The modeled noise levels for the project are provided in Table 4: Private Event Noise Contours and Exhibit 4: Operational Noise Cnntni i rc
As shown in Table 4, Pavilion event noise levels at the would range from approximately 31.6 dBA to

64.7 dBA at the surrounding residences and would not exceed the City's 65 dBA noise standard. In addition, interior noise levels would reach a maximum of 38.7 dBA at the surrounding residential uses and would not exceed the City's 45 dBA interior noise standard. However, due to the variability of speaker noise levels (i.e., DJ's can set or increase speaker noise to their desired level) and the general difficulty in managing or controlling crowd noise, it is recommended the maximum noise level from amplified speakers at the Pavilion be limited to 84 dBA at a distance of 50 feet; see Mitigation Measure NOI-1. This maximum speaker noise level would ensure the surrounding residences are not be exposed to noise levels above the City's noise standards.

Table 4: Pavilion Event Noise Levels
Receptor No.'
Land Use
Modeled Exterior
Noise Level (dBA)
Interior Noise
Level (dBA)
1 Single -Family Residential

62.8 36.8
2 Single -Family Residential

61.9 35.9
3 Single -Family Residential

61.7 35.7
4 Single -Family Residential

59.2 33.2
5 Single -Family Residential

56.6 30.6
6 Single -Family Residential

59.9 33.9
7 Single -Family Residential

62.2 36.2
8 Single -Family Residential

61.5 35.5
9 Single -Family Residential

64.7 38.7
10 Single -Family Residential

61.7 35.7
11 Single -Family Residential

61.4 35.4
12 Single -Family Residential

56.4 30.4
13 Single -Family Residential

49.3 23.3
14 Single -Family Residential

50.1 24.1
15 Single -Family Residential

50.9 24.9
16 Single -Family Residential

53.0 27.0
17 Single -Family Residential

49.7 23.7
18 Single -Family Residential

51.0 25.0
19 Single -Family Residential

43.6 17.6
20 Single -Family Residential

45.4 19.4
21 Single -Family Residential

45.0 19.0
22 Single -Family Residential

44.4 18.4
23 Single -Family Residential

31.5 5.5
24 Single -Family Residential

38.5 12.5
25 Single -Family Residential

38.8 12.8

Kimley»>Horn

Page 12 ends

Table 4: Pavilion Event Noise Levels
Receptor No.'
Land Use
Modeled Exterior
Noise Level (dBA)
Interior Noise
Level (dBA)
26 Single -Family Residential

39.7 13.7
27 Single -Family Residential

51.6 25.6
28 Single -Family Residential

54.1 28.1
29 Single -Family Residential

52.0 26.0
30 Single -Family Residential

49.3 23.3
31 Single -Family Residential

48.6 22.6
32 Single -Family Residential

49.8 23.8
33 Single -Family Residential

50.8 24.8
34 Single -Family Residential

53.4 27.4
35 Single -Family Residential

53.6 27.6
Notes:

1. Interior noise levels were calculated assuming an exterior -interior sound reduction of 26 dBA from standard construction practices, per Barbara Locher, et al., Differences between Outdoor and Indoor Sound Levels for Open, Tilted, and Closed Windows, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, January 2018.

Source: SouncIPLAN version 9.0. See Appendix A for noise modeling data and results.

Mitigation Measure N0I-1
Noise levels from amplified speakers shall be limited to a maximum of 84 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet, and the speaker location shall be limited to the southeast corner of the Pavilion as shown in Exhibit 2. The DJ, event coordinator, or designated appointee shall complete a noise measurement at 50 feet downstream from (or directly in front of) the amplified speakers prior to event commencement and ensure the noise level does not exceed 84 dBA Leq. The speaker volume shall be iteratively adjusted until a maximum noise level of 84 dBA Leq is achieved.

Conclusion
As discussed above, the project's operational noise levels would comply with TMC noise standards based on measured noise levels for existing events at the Pavilion. However, Mitigation Measure N0I- 1 is recommended to ensure noise levels from new private events, such as weddings and banquets, do not exceed the City's noise standards at the surrounding residences. With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1, a less than significant noise impact would occur.

Kimley»>Horn
Figure 3: Private Event Noise Contours
' (z
/
I,:
._.�- are I I� d

Page 13 ends

Noise levels Leq,d dB(A)j
® c-45
45 c c=50
50 < <-55
55 < <= 60
60 < c-65
65 c c=70
70 < —75
75 <� c=80
80 c c-85
85 c
Point Source - DJ/Speakers 1
65 dBA Limit Line
Dace r 10!2024
Length Scale 1:4289
0 20 30 U 170 I.:..

Kiinley Morn

Appendix A
,11c•11-14 "Millf_l

Noise Measurement Field Data
Project:

Redhawk Golf Course
Job Number:
95382005
Site No.:

ST-1 - Ambient
Date:
6/15/2024
Analyst:

Miles Eaton
Time:
2:10 PM
Location:

End of cul de sac of Camino Carmago,approximately 450 feet northwest of Pavilion Noise Sources:

Ambient roadway noises
Comments:

Results (dBA):

Leq:

Lmin:

Lmax:

Peak:

48.0 39.4

57.8 87.0
Equipment
Weather
Sound Level Meter: LD Sound Expert LxT
Temp. (degrees F):
90 Calibrator: CAL200
Wind (mph):

SSW @ 10 mph
Response Time: Slow
Sky:

Clear
Weighting: A
Bar. Pressure:

29.83 Microphone Height: 5 feet
Humidity:
36%
Photo:
�r
�.:
u tj.

1. Kid 1 Fie )) HV 1 1 1

Report Summary
Meter's File Name ST-_.141.s
Meter LxT SE 0007061
User
Job Description
Note
Start Time 2024-06-15 14:10:49
End Time 2024-06-15 14:20:49
Pre -Calibration 2024-06-1514:05:04
Measurement Report
Computer's File Name LxTse_ST-1.ldbin
Firmware 2.404
Location
Duration 0:10:00.0
Run Time 0:08:25.4
Post -Calibration None
Results
Overall Metrics
Lp6q

48.0 dB
LAE

75.0 dB
SEA --- dB
EA 3.5 NPa2h
Leak

87.0 dB
2024-06-15 14:15:39
LASmax

57.8 dB
2024-06-15 14:18:13
LASnin

39.4 dB
2024-06-15 14:15:10
LP6q

48.0 dB
LCIq

59.1 dB
LCeq - LPIq 11.1 dB
LA6q

51.5 dB
LALq - LN, 3.5 dB
Exceedances
Count
Duration
LAS > 85.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LAS > 115.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 135.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 137.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 140.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
Community Noise
LDN
May

48.0 dB

48.0 dB
LDEN
May

48.0 dB

48.0 dB
Any Data
A
Level
Time Stamp
Leq

48.0 dB
Limax)

57.8 dB
2024-06-15 14:18:13
L�min)

39.4 dB
2024-06-15 14:15:10
LPeak(max)

87.0 dB
2024-06-15 14:15:39
Overloads
Count
Duration
0 0:00:00.0
Statistics
LAS 5.0

53.6 dB
LAS 10.0

51.3 dB
LAS 33.3

47.3 dB
LAS 50.0

45.9 dB
LAS 66.6

44.6 dB
LAS 90.0

42.2 dB
L.Night

0.0 dB
LEve
--- dB
C
Level

59.1 dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
OBA Count
0 Pause Time
Calibration Deviation
LNight
--- dB
Time Stamp
None
None
None
OBA Duration
0:00:00.0
Z
Level
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
0:01:34.6
Time Stamp
None
None
None

Time History
140
120
100
0 80
> 60
40 20
14:11 14:13 14:1 5 14:19
14:12 14:14 14:18 14:20

Noise Measurement Field Data
Project:

Redhawk Golf Course
Job Number:
95382005
Site No.:

ST-2 - Ambient
Date:
6/15/2024
Analyst:

Miles Eaton
Time:
2:41 PM
Location:

Redhawk Golf Course parking lot, approximately 200 feet west of the Pavilion Noise Sources:

Ambient from roadway
Comments:

Results (dBA):

Leq: Lmin:

Lmax:

Peak:

48.1 37.5

60.7 85.8
Equipment
Weather
Sound Level Meter: LD SoundExpert LxT
Temp. (degrees F):
90 Calibrator: CAL200
Wind (mph):

SSW @ 14 MPH
Response Time: Slow
Sky:

Clear
Weighting: A
Bar. Pressure:

29.79 Microphone Height: 5 feet
Humidity:
36%
Photo:
'•y r 11
` l
imley,>> Horn

Report Summary
Meter's File Name ST-1.055.s
Meter LxT SE 0007061
User
Job Description
Note
Start Time 2024-06-15 14:41:25
End Time 2024-06-15 14:51:25
Pre -Calibration 2024-06-1514:05:02
Results
Overall Metrics
Lp6q

48.1 dB
LAE

75.9 dB
EA

4.3 NPa2h
Leak

85.8 dB
LASmax

60.7 dB
LASnin

37.5 dB
LP%q

48.1 dB
Measurement Report
Computer's File Name LxTse_ST-2.ldbin
Firmware 2.404
Location
Duration 0:10:00.0
Run Time 0:10:00.0
Post -Calibration None
SEA --- dB
2024-06-15 14:43:19
2024-06-15 14:47:30
2024-06-15 14:46:41
LCIq

61.7 dB
LCeq - LAIq
LA6q

52.0 dB
LALq - LN,
Exceedances
Count
Duration
LAS > 85.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LAS > 115.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 135.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 137.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 140.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
Community Noise
LDN
May

48.1 dB

48.1 dB
LDEN
May

48.1 dB

48.1 dB
Any Data
A
Level
Time Stamp
Leq

48.1 dB
Limax)

60.7 dB
2024-06-15 14:47:30
L�min)

37.5 dB
2024-06-15 14:46:41
LPeak(max)

85.8 dB
2024-06-15 14:43:19
Overloads
Count
Duration
0 0:00:00.0
Statistics
LAS 5.0

54.4 dB
LAS 10.0

52.3 dB
LAS 33.3

44.5 dB
LAS 50.0

42.9 dB
LAS 66.6

41.2 dB
LAS 90.0

38.8 dB

13.6 dB

3.9 dB
L.Night

0.0 dB
LEve
--- dB
C
Level

61.7 dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
OBA Count
0 Pause Time
Calibration Deviation
LNight
--- dB
Time Stamp
None
None
None
OBA Duration
0:00:00.0
Z
Level
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
0:00:00.0
Time Stamp
None
None
None

Time History
140
120
100
80 cu
60 40
20 0
14:42 14:44 14:46
14:43 14:45 14
14:48 141:50
14:49 14:51

Noise Measurement Field Data
Project:

Redhawk Golf Course
Job Number:
95382005
Site No.:

ST-3 - Ambient
Date:
6/15/2024
Analyst:

Miles Eaton
Time:
3:17 PM
Location:

East of the Pavilion, across the golf course adjacent to residences along Tiburco Drive Noise Sources:

Ambient
Comments:

Results (dBA):

Leq: Lmin:

Lmax:

Peak:

46.5 41.3

65.7 83.3
Equipment
Weather
Sound Level Meter: LD SoundExpert LxT
Temp. (degrees F):
90 Calibrator: CAL200
Wind (mph):

SSW @ 11 mph
Response Time: Slow
Sky:

Clear
Weighting: A
Bar. Pressure:

29.76 Microphone Height: 5 feet
Humidity:
36%
Photo:' 1
ri
wt
- k
i"
l
imley,>> Horn

Report Summary
Meter's File Name ST-1.056.s
Meter LxT SE 0007061
User
Job Description
Note
Start Time 2024-06-15 15:17:04
End Time 2024-06-15 15:27:04
Pre -Calibration 2024-06-1514:05:02
Measurement Report
Computer's File Name LxTse_ST-3.ldbin
Firmware 2.404
Location
Duration 0:10:00.0
Run Time 0:10:00.0
Post -Calibration None
Results
Overall Metrics
Lp6q

46.5 dB
LAE

74.3 dB
SEA --- dB
EA 3.0 NPa2h
Leak

83.3 dB
2024-06-15 15:17:08
LASmax

65.7 dB
2024-06-15 15:17:04
LAST ir,

41.3 dB
2024-06-15 15:23:53
LP6q

46.5 dB
LCIq

58.7 dB
LCeq - LPIq 12.2 dB
LA6q

51.1 dB
LALq - LN, 4.6 dB
Exceedances
Count
Duration
LAS > 85.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LAS > 115.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 135.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 137.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 140.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
Community Noise
LDN
May

46.5 dB

46.5 dB
LDEN
May

46.5 dB

46.5 dB
Any Data
A
Level
Time Stamp
Leq

46.5 dB
Limax)

65.7 dB
2024-06-15 15:17:04
L�min)

41.3 dB
2024-06-15 15:23:53
LPeak(max)

83.3 dB
2024-06-15 15:17:08
Overloads
Count
Duration
0 0:00:00.0
Statistics
LAS 5.0

49.9 dB
LAS 10.0

48.4 dB
LAS 33.3

45.9 dB
LAS 50.0

45.0 dB
LAS 66.6

44.2 dB
LAS 90.0

43.1 dB
L.Night

0.0 dB
LEve
--- dB
C
Level

58.7 dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
OBA Count
0 Pause Time
Calibration Deviation
LNight
--- dB
Time Stamp
None
None
None
OBA Duration
0:00:00.0
Z
Level
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
0:00:00.0
Time Stamp
None
None
None

Time History
140
120
100
v
80 60
40 20
15:18 15:20 15:22 1 5:2.1 15:26
1 5:19 15:21 15:2 1 5:25 15:2 i

Noise Measurement Field Data
Project:

Redhawk Golf Course
Job Number:
95382005
Site No.:

ST-1 - Event
Date:
6/15/2024
Analyst:

Miles Eaton
Time:
8:05 PM
Location:

End of cul de sac of Camino Carmago,approximately 450 feet northwest of Pavilion Noise Sources:

Ambient roadway noises. Event music.

Comments:

Results (dBA):

Leq: Lmin:

Lmax:

Peak:

50.0 43.5

58.0 80.8
Equipment
Weather
Sound Level Meter: LD SounclExpert LxT
Temp. (degrees F):
72 Calibrator: CAL200
Wind (mph):

SSW @ 6 mph
Response Time: Slow
Sky:

Clear
Weighting: A
Bar. Pressure:

29.82 Microphone Height: 5 feet
Humidity:
58%
Photo:
..
h y
r
7'
r
Y
imley,>> Horn

Report Summary
Meter's File Name ST-1.057.s
Meter LxT SE 0007061
User
Job Description
Note
Start Time 2024-06-15 20:05:42
End Time 2024-06-15 20:15:42
Pre -Calibration 2024-06-1514:05:02
Measurement Report
Computer's File Name LxTse_ST-1.ldbin
Firmware 2.404
Location
Duration 0:10:00.0
Run Time 0:10:00.0
Post -Calibration None
Results
Overall Metrics
Lp6q

50.0 dB
LAE

77.8 dB
SEA --- dB
EA 6.7 NPa2h
Leak

80.8 dB
2024-06-15 20:11:51
LASmax

58.0 dB
2024-06-15 20:06:37
LAST in

43.5 dB
2024-06-15 20:11:07
LP6q

50.0 dB
LCIq

62.2 dB
LCeq - LPIq 12.2 dB
LA6q

52.6 dB
LALq - LN, 2.6 dB
Exceedances
Count
Duration
LAS > 85.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LAS > 115.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 135.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 137.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 140.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
Community Noise
LDN
May

50.0 dB

50.0 dB
LDEN
May
--- dB
--- dB
Any Data
A
Level
Time Stamp
Leq

50.0 dB
Limax)

58.0 dB
2024-06-15 20:06:37
L�min)

43.5 dB
2024-06-15 20:11:07
LPeak(max)

80.8 dB
2024-06-15 20:11:51
Overloads
Count
Duration
0 0:00:00.0
Statistics
LAS 5.0

53.1 dB
LAS 10.0

52.2 dB
LAS 33.3

50.4 dB
LAS 50.0

49.5 dB
LAS 66.6

48.5 dB
LAS 90.0

46.2 dB
L.Night

0.0 dB
LEve

50.0 dB
C
Level

62.2 dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
OBA Count
0 Pause Time
Calibration Deviation
LNight
--- dB
Time Stamp
None
None
None
OBA Duration
0:00:00.0
Z
Level
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
0:00:00.0
Time Stamp
None
None
None

Time History
140
120
100
0 80
40 20
20:06 20:08 20:10 20:12 20:14
20:07 20:09 20 1 : 20:1 20:1 S

Noise Measurement Field Data
Project:

Redhawk Golf Course
Job Number:
95382005
Site No.:

ST-2 - Event
Date:
6/15/2024
Analyst:

Miles Eaton
Time:
8:23 PM
Location:

Redhawk Golf Course parking lot, approximately 200 feet west of the Pavilion Noise Sources:

Ambient from roadway, music, patrons
Comments:

Results (dBA):

Leq: Lmin:

Lmax:

Peak:

50.1 45.9

56.5 83.0
Equipment
Weather
Sound Level Meter: LD SoundExpert LxT
Temp. (degrees F):
75 Calibrator: CAL200
Wind (mph):

SSW @ 6 MPH
Response Time: Slow
Sky:

Clear
Weighting: A
Bar. Pressure:

29.75 Microphone Height: 5 feet
Humidity:
51%
Photo:
•
T �'r� V
�
::,r�
imley,>> Horn

Report Summary
Meter's File Name ST-1.058.s
Meter LxT SE 0007061
User
Job Description
Note
Start Time 2024-06-15 20:23:06
End Time 2024-06-15 20:33:06
Pre -Calibration 2024-06-1514:05:02
Measurement Report
Computer's File Name LxTse_ST-2.ldbin
Firmware 2.404
Location
Duration 0:10:00.0
Run Time 0:10:00.0
Post -Calibration None
Results
Overall Metrics
Lp6q

50.1 dB
LAE

77.9 dB
SEA --- dB
EA 6.8 NPa2h
Leak

83.0 dB
2024-06-15 20:32:50
LASmax

56.5 dB
2024-06-15 20:32:59
LASt ir,

45.9 dB
2024-06-15 20:29:40
LP6q

50.1 dB
LCIq

64.8 dB
LCeq - LPIq 14.7 dB
LA6q

52.2 dB
LALq - LN, 2.1 dB
Exceedances
Count
Duration
LAS > 85.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LAS > 115.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 135.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 137.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 140.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
Community Noise
LDN
May

50.1 dB

50.1 dB
LDEN
May
--- dB
--- dB
Any Data
A
Level
Time Stamp
Leq

50.1 dB
Limax)

56.5 dB
2024-06-15 20:32:59
L�min)

45.9 dB
2024-06-15 20:29:40
LPeak(max)

83.0 dB
2024-06-15 20:32:50
Overloads
Count
Duration
0 0:00:00.0
Statistics
LAS 5.0

52.2 dB
LAS 10.0

51.7 dB
LAS 33.3

50.4 dB
LAS 50.0

49.7 dB
LAS 66.6

49.1 dB
LAS 90.0

48.1 dB
L.Night

0.0 dB
LEve

50.1 dB
C
Level

64.8 dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
OBA Count
0 Pause Time
Calibration Deviation
LNight
--- dB
Time Stamp
None
None
None
OBA Duration
0:00:00.0
Z
Level
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
0:00:00.0
Time Stamp
None
None
None

Time History
140
120
100
0 80
l
60 40
20 20:24 20:26 20:28 20:30 20:32
20:25 20:27 20:21� 20:31 20:33

Noise Measurement Field Data
Project:

Redhawk Golf Course
Job Number:
95382005
Site No.:

ST-3 - Event
Date:
6/15/2024
Analyst:

Miles Eaton
Time:
8:41 PM
Location:

East of the Pavilion, across the golf course adjacent to residences along Tiburco Drive Noise Sources:

Ambient, event
Comments:

Results (dBA):

Leq:

Lmin:

Lmax:

Peak:

48.7 43.0

55.1 78.8
Equipment
Weather
Sound Level Meter: LD SoundExpert LxT
Temp. (degrees F):
75 Calibrator: CAL200
Wind (mph):

SSW @ 6 mph
Response Time: Slow
Sky:

Clear
Weighting: A
Bar. Pressure:

29.75 Microphone Height: 5 feet
Humidity:
51%
Photo:
`
imley,>> Horn

Report Summary
Meter's File Name ST-1.059.s
Meter LxT SE 0007061
User
Job Description
Note
Start Time 2024-06-15 20:41:34
End Time 2024-06-15 20:51:34
Pre -Calibration 2024-06-1514:05:02
Measurement Report
Computer's File Name LxTse_ST-3.ldbin
Firmware 2.404
Location
Duration 0:10:00.0
Run Time 0:10:00.0
Post -Calibration None
Results
Overall Metrics
Lp6q

48.7 dB
LAE

76.5 dB
SEA --- dB
EA 4.9 NPa2h
Leak

78.8 dB
2024-06-15 20:41:51
LASmax

55.1 dB
2024-06-15 20:44:48
LASt in

43.0 dB
2024-06-15 20:41:35
LP6q

48.7 dB
LCIq

61.5 dB
LCeq - LPIq 12.8 dB
LA6q

50.7 dB
LALq - LN, 2.0 dB
Exceedances
Count
Duration
LAS > 85.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LAS > 115.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 135.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 137.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 140.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
Community Noise
LDN
May

48.7 dB

48.7 dB
LDEN
May
--- dB
--- dB
Any Data
A
Level
Time Stamp
Leq

48.7 dB
Limax)

55.1 dB
2024-06-15 20:44:48
L�min)

43.0 dB
2024-06-15 20:41:35
LPeak(max)

78.8 dB
2024-06-15 20:41:51
Overloads
Count
Duration
0 0:00:00.0
Statistics
LAS 5.0

50.8 dB
LAS 10.0

50.3 dB
LAS 33.3

49.0 dB
LAS 50.0

48.5 dB
LAS 66.6

47.9 dB
LAS 90.0

46.8 dB
LNight

0.0 dB
LEve

48.7 dB
C
Level

61.5 dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
OBA Count
0 Pause Time
Calibration Deviation
LNight
--- dB
Time Stamp
None
None
None
OBA Duration
0:00:00.0
Z
Level
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
0:00:00.0
Time Stamp
None
None
None

Time History
140
120
100
80 v L I
60 Inl'11�j
40 20
20:42 20:44 20:46 20:48 20:50
20:43 20:45 20.47 20:49 20:51

Noise Measurement Field Data
Project:

Redhawk Golf Course
Job Number:
95382005
Site No.:

ST-4 - Event
Date:
6/15/2024
Analyst:

Miles Eaton
Time:
9:00 PM
Location:

End of driveway, north of the pavilion
Noise Sources:

Ambient from roadway, music, patrons
Comments:

Results (dBA):

Leq:

Lmin:

Lmax:

Peak:

74.6 66.0

80.8 94.6
Equipment
Weather
Sound Level Meter: LD Sound Expert LxT
Temp. (degrees F):
69 Calibrator: CAL200
Wind (mph):

SSW @ 5 mph
Response Time: Slow
Sky:

Clear
Weighting: A
Bar. Pressure:

29.79 Microphone Height: 5 feet
Humidity:
63%
Photo:

Report Summary
Meter's File Name ST-1.060.s
Meter LxT SE 0007061
User
Job Description
Note
Start Time 2024-06-15 20:59:46
End Time 2024-06-15 21:09:46
Pre -Calibration 2024-06-1514:05:02
Measurement Report
Computer's File Name LxTse_ST-4.ldbin
Firmware 2.404
Location
Duration 0:10:00.0
Run Time 0:10:00.0
Post -Calibration None
Results
Overall Metrics
Lp6q

74.6 dB
LAE 102.4
dB
SEA --- dB
EA 1.9 mPalh
Leak

94.6 dB
2024-06-15 21:03:07
LASmax

80.8 dB
2024-06-15 21:03:10
LASinir,

66.0 dB
2024-06-15 21:05:16
LP%q

74.6 dB
LCIq

83.8 dB
LCeq - LPIq 9.2 dB
LA6q

77.4 dB
LALq - LN, 2.8 dB
Exceedances
Count
Duration
LAS > 85.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LAS > 115.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 135.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 137.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
LApk > 140.0 dB
0 0:00:00.0
Community Noise
LDN
May

74.6 dB

74.6 dB
LDEN
May
--- dB
--- dB
Any Data
A
Level
Time Stamp
Leq

74.6 dB
Limax)

80.8 dB
2024-06-15 21:03:10
L�min)

66.0 dB
2024-06-15 21:05:16
LPeak(max)

94.6 dB
2024-06-15 21:03:07
Overloads
Count
Duration
0 0:00:00.0
Statistics
LAS 5.0

77.9 dB
LAS 10.0

77.2 dB
LAS 33.3

74.9 dB
LAS 50.0

74.0 dB
LAS 66.6

73.1 dB
LAS 90.0

71.1 dB
LNight

0.0 dB
LEve

74.6 dB
C
Level

83.8 dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
OBA Count
0 Pause Time
Calibration Deviation
LNight
--- dB
Time Stamp
None
None
None
OBA Duration
0:00:00.0
Z
Level
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
--- dB
0:00:00.0
Time Stamp
None
None
None

Time History
140
120
100
80 ro M
60 40
20 21:00 21:02 21:04 21 :06 21:08
21:01 21:03 2 1 n ; 21:07 21:09

Redhawk Golf Course Events
SoundPLAN Receiver Table
Limit
Single Point
No.

Floor Name
Usage
Direction Lr,lim
Leq,d
dB A
dB A
1 G 1
GR
65 62.8
2 G 2
GR
65 61.9
3 G 3
GR
65 61.7
4 G 4
GR
65 59.2
5 G 5
GR
65 56.6
6 G 6
GR
65 59.9
7 G 7
GR
65 62.2
8 G 8
GR
65 61.5
9 G 9
GR
65 64.7
10 G 10
GR
65 61.7
11 G 11
GR
65 61.4
12 G 12
GR
65 56.4
13 G 13
GR
65 49.3
14 G 14
GR
65 50.1
15 G 15
GR
65 50.9
16 G 16
GR
65 53.0
17 G 17
GR
65 49.7
18 G 18
GR
65 51.0
19 G 19
GR
65 43.6
20 G 20
GR
65 45.4
21 G 21
GR
65 45.0
22 G 22
GR
65 44.4
23 G 23
GR
65 31.5
24 G 24
GR
65 38.5
25 G 25
GR
65 38.8
26 G 26
GR
65 39.7
27 G 27
GR
65 51.6
28 G 28
GR
65 54.1
29 G 29
GR
65 52.0
30 G 30
GR
65 49.3
31 G 31
GR
65 48.6
32 G 32
GR
65 49.8
33 G 33
GR
65 50.8
34 G 34
GR
65 53.4
35 G 35
1 GR
I 1 651

53.6 Kimley-Horn, 1100 Town and Country Rd, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 1/1
Sound PLANnoise 9.0

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
June 2025
Appendix B
Traffic Memorandum
(!9lCK A'

Kimley»>Horn
July 3, 2024
Eric Jones
City of Temecula
Planning Department
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject: Traffic Memorandum for the Proposed Redhawk Specific Plan Amendment Project in the City of Temecula
Dear Mr. Jones:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has prepared a traffic memorandum to evaluate trip generating characteristics and a qualitative Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) assessment of the proposed Redhawk Specific Plan Amendment Project (the "Project").

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Temecula (City). The Project proponent is seeking a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for additional event types to be hosted within the existing Redhawk Golf Course Pavilion. Currently, the Redhawk Golf Course Pavilion is used to host golf -related events. The previous minor modification allowed the existing Pavilion to host up to 144 guests, according to Statement of Operations from the previous minor modification. The golf course is adequately parked with 204 parking stalls total, inclusive of 5 accessible parking stalls. Generally, according to historical operational information provided by the Project Applicant, during events the majority of guests will arrive with multiple people in one vehicle or utilize rideshare services, reducing the demand on parking spaces at the golf course.

The CUP would allow other events similar to the current golf -related events, such as weddings, banquets, birthdays, community outreach events, or any other private events. No new structures are proposed or would be developed as part of the Project. The CUP does not propose changes to the existing hours of operations, lighting, or parking for the Pavilion. Private events would be allowed 7 days per week. Events would continue to be allowed from 3:00 pm to 10:00 pm with all amplified noise ending at 9:45 pm, and subject to the City's noise ordinance.

TRIPS AND TRAFFIC
A summary of the existing golf course operations trip generation is provided in Table 1, Summary of Existing Project Trip Generation. Trip generation rates were determined based on data provided by the Project Applicant and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. ITE Land Use designations are limited and may not

Kimley»>Horn
encompass the utility of certain land uses, as not enough real -world data have been collected to provide a representative trip rate. The ITE Land Use for golf courses (ITE Code 430) is used. The ITE Trip Generation Manual does not contain trip generation rates for special events. To provide accurate trip generation estimates, the Project Applicant, Redhawk Golf Course, provided information related to the maximum number of attendees allowed during any specific event.

Under the previous minor modification to construct the Pavilion, up to 144 guests were allowed per special event. The previously defined assumption that guests would arrive one to a vehicle would represent 144 one-way trips per event. However, based on information obtained from the project Applicant, most guests arrive via carpool or ride share services and therefore would result in fewer trips per event. To maintain a conservative analysis, a carpool rate of 40 percent is assumed, resulting in 86 trips in and 86 trips out of each event (172 event trips total), with the incoming trips occurring during the evening peak hour. As events are planned to end at 10:00 pm, the outbound trips would not occur during the evening peak hour.

Table 1, Summary of Existing Project Trip Generation
Land Use
ITE
Code
Unit
Trip Generation
Rates'
Dail y
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Golf Course
430
Holes

30.38 1.39

0.37 1.76

1.54 1.37

2.91 Special
Events
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Land Use
ITE
Code
Unit
Trip Generation Estimates
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Golf Course
Holes
547
25 7
32 28
25 53
Special Events
N/A
172
0 0
0 86
0 86
Total Project Trips
719
25 7
32 114
25 139
' Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition.

Project -related traffic would be identical to the existing condition at the Redhawk Golf Course and existing Pavilion. As such, the Project would not increase traffic or trips at the Pavilion for special events; rather, the proposed Project would allow these special events (and associated trips) to be non -golf related events. Further, the Project does not propose an expansion of uses, facilities, or other factors of the existing site that could possibly result in increased intensity of uses and associated trips. Therefore, for the purposes of environmental analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Project would not result in an "increase" in daily traffic at the Redhawk Golf Course or its Pavilion during Project operations. Further, special event guests would likely use carpooling or ride sharing services at a greater percentage than that which has been assumed in this Memorandum.

Kimley»>Horn

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
SB 743 was approved by the California legislature in September 2013. SB 743 required changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), specifically directing the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop alternative metrics to the use of vehicular "Level of Service" (LOS) for evaluating transportation projects. OPR has updated guidelines for CEQA and written a technical advisory for evaluating transportation impacts in CEQA and set a deadline of July 2020.OPR has recommended that Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) replace also as the primary measure of transportation impacts. OPR Technical Advisory suggests that the City may screen out VMT impact using project size, maps, transit availability, and provision of affordable housing to quickly identify when a project should be expected to cause a less -than significant impact without conducting a detailed study. The City of Temecula has published the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (May 2020) as recommended guidelines for analyzing transportation impacts of proposed projects. The City provides screening criteria for CEQA VMT analyses for land use projects which consist of seven total criteria. These criteria are:
1) Small residential and employment projects
a. Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips (trips are based on the number of vehicle trips after any alternative modes/location-based adjustments are applied) may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.
2) Projects located near a major transit stop/high quality transit corridor a. Projects located within a half mile of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high -quality transit corridor2 may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project:
i. Hasa Floor Area Ratio of less than 0.75.
ii. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the City.
iii. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high -income residential units.
3) Projects located in a VMT efficient area
a. A VMT efficient area is any area with an average VMT per service population 15% below the baseline average for the WRCOG region. Land use projects may qualify for the use of VMT efficient area screening if the project can be reasonably expected to generate VMT per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the VMT efficient area. Projects located within a VMT efficient area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.
4) Locally serving retail projects
a. Local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet maybe presumed to

Kimley»>Horn
have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel.
5) Locally serving public utilities
a. Public facilities that serve the surrounding community or public facilities that are passive use may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.
6) Redevelopment projects with greater VMT efficiency
a. A redevelopment project may be presumed to have a less than significant impact if the proposed project's total project VMT is less than the existing land use's total VMT.
7) Affordable housing
a. An affordable housing project maybe presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

Based on the VMT screening criteria and the assumed trips generated as a result of hosting additional events at the pavilion, the Project would meet criterion one as a small residential and employment project as it would not generate or add new trips in excess of 110 daily trips. Refer to Table 1. As previously discussed, the Project is consistent with the existing operations of the golf course special events and Project related traffic would be identical to the existing conditions. Therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in daily traffic or VMT at the Redhawk Golf Course. Further, it is likely that special event guests would carpool or use ride share services at a greater rate than what has been assumed for this Memorandum which would have a further VMT reducing effect. Therefore, the Project would not cause a significant impact with respect to VMT.

Conclusion
Per the City of Temecula's published Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, projects that generate or add fewer than 110 daily vehicle trips do not require a VMT analysis and the VMT impact is considered less than significant. The Project would operate consistently with the existing operations and would not add new trips at the Redhawk Golf Course. As such, the Project impacts related to transportation would be less than significant.

Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Miles Eaton, P.E.

RESOLUTION NO.2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF TEMECULA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (PA23-0251) TO ALLOW A WEDDING/EVENT

CENTER TO BE OPERATED AS PART OF AN EXISTING
GOLF COURSE LOCATED AT 45100 REDHAWK
PARKWAY (APN: 962-040-012)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

A. On June 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application No. PA23-0251, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wedding/event center to be operated as part of an existing golf course. On August 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application PA23-0327, a Specific Plan Amendment for the Redhawk Specific Plan to allow wedding/special event uses at the golf course and add related standards for those uses. Both applications were submitted in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Both applications will be referred to collectively as "the Project".

B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act.

C. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").

D. The City contracted with Kimley-Horn for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, Kimley-Horn and City staff concluded that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, but that mitigation measures could be implemented to reduce such impacts to a less than significant level. Based upon this determination, Kimley-Horn prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration ("Draft MND") in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

E. On February 4, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.

F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted

Resolution Nos. 2026-07 ,2026-08, and 2026-09 recommending that the City Council approve PA23-0251, PA23-0327 and the Final MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

G. On July 14, 2026, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project, the Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project, Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prior to and at the public hearing.

H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026- "A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE REDHAWK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET FROM THE REDHAWK PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY INTERSECTION AT 45100 REDHAWK PARKWAY (APN: 962-040-012)".

I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Conditional Use Permit hereby makes the following findings:

A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code.

The proposed conditional use conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. Goal 7 speaks of having "Community gathering areas which provide for the social, civic, cultural and recreational needs of the community. Specifically, Policy 7.4 encourages common areas and facilities within residential developments that provide gathering areas for social and recreational activities. The proposed wedding and event center is consistent with this goal and policy. The proposed conditional use also complies with all applicable Development Code standards contained in Section 17.04.010.

B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.

The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the project. This document indicates that all impacts to the adjacent uses, buildings or structures can be mitigated to a less than significant level. The pavilion is located approximately 300 feet from the nearest residential property line. Mitigation has been included with the project that will limit speaker volume to a maximum of 84 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. In addition, speakers shall be limited to the southeast corner of the pavilion.

C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the planning commission or council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.

The proposed conditional use will not require any modifications to the existing site or any existing structures. Therefore, the site for the conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features. The proposed uses will be well integrated with other existing uses in the neighborhood.

D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community.

The project has been reviewed and conditioned to be consistent with the Building, Development, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions to ensure uses are not detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. The pavilion is located approximately 300 feet from the nearest residential property line. Mitigation has been included with the project that will limit speaker volume to a maximum of 84 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. In addition, speakers shall be limited to the southeast corner of the pavilion. This mitigation will ensure the City's noise regulations are adhered to.

E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the planning director, planning commission, or city council on appeal.

The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use was based on substantial evidence in view of the record as whole before the City Council.

Section 3. Conditions of Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Planning Application No. PA23-0251, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wedding/event center to be operated as part of the existing golf course located at 45100 Redhawk Parkway, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and it shall become effective upon its adoption.
3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 10 day of July, 2026.

Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk

CITY OF TEMECULA

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ACCEPTANCE
Planning Application Number: PA23-0251
Parcel Number(s):
962-040-012
By signing below, I/we have agreed to the following Conditions of Approval, including (but not limited to) any referenced documents, local, state, or federal regulations, statement of operations, hours of operation, floor plans, site plans, and Conditions that may require the payment or reimbursement of fees, as described. I/we have read the attached Conditions of Approval and understand them.

I/we also understand that violations or non-compliance with these Conditions of Approval, may delay a project, and/or result in the revocation of a permit in accordance with the Temecula Municipal Code. I/we are also responsible for disclosing these Conditions of Approval to any successive owners/operators. I/we agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I/we will implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification requirements imposed by those conditions.

Property Owner Printed Name
Property Owner Signature & Date
Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature & Date

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF TEMECULA

DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA23-0251
Project Description: Redhawk Event Center CUP: A Conditional Use Permit to allow an event center to be operated as part of an existing golf course between the hours of Noon and 9:00 p.m. no more than three days per week. The project is located at 45100 Temecula Parkway.

Assessor's Parcel No.: 962-040-012
MSHCP Category: N/A (No New Square Footage or Grading)
DIF Category: N/A (No New Square Footage)
TUMF Category: Per WRCOG Requirements
Quimby Category: N/A (Non -Residential Project)
New Street In -lieu of Fee: N/A (Not Located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) Approval Date: May 26, 2026
Expiration Date: May 26, 2028

PLANNING DIVISION
Within 48 Hours of the Approval

Page 1 of 8 ends

Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED:

The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition Failure to submit the Notice of Determination will also result in an extended period of time for legal challenges.

FEES:

Fees for the Notice of Determination are Two Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty -Six Dollars And Seventy -Five Cents ($2,966.75) which includes the Two Thousand Nine Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Seventy -Five Cents ($2,916.75) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions.

FILING:

The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor — County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA.

COPY OF FILINGS:

The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours.

General Requirements

2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.

Page 2 of 8 ends

Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit.

4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time.

Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 9 (Redhawk).

6. Compliance with Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within Mitigated Negative Declaration No. (SCH# 2025061421).

Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division.

Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project.

Statement of Operations. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated May 2025, on file with the Planning Division, unless a conflict exists between the Statement of Operations and these Conditions of Approval, in which case the Conditions of Approval control.

10. Revocation of CUP. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section

17.03.080 of the City's Development Code.

11. City Review and Modification of CUP. The City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in -lieu of, the right of the City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon.

12. Adherence to Noise Ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. The use shall at all times be consistent with the City of Temecula Noise Ordinance (Chapter 9.20) as amended from time to time and the Noise Element of the City of Temecula General Plan as amended from time to time.

Page 3 of 8 ends

13. Hours of Operations. Weddings/events shall occur no more than three times per week on the following days and times:

Sunday: Noon to 8:59:59 p.m. (Clean-up shall be completed by 10:00:00 p.m.) Monday: Noon to 8:59:59 p.m. (Clean-up shall be completed by 10:00:00 p.m.) Tuesday: Noon to 8:59:59 p.m. (Clean-up shall be completed by 10:00:00 p.m.) Wednesday: Noon to 8:59:59 p.m. (Clean-up shall be completed by 10:00:00 p.m.) Thursday: Noon to 8:59:59 p.m. (Clean-up shall be completed by 10:00:00 p.m.) Friday: Noon to 8:59:59 p.m. (Clean-up shall be completed by 10:00:00 p.m.) Saturday: Noon to 8:59:59 p.m. (Clean-up shall be completed by 10:00:00 p.m.)

14. Noise Tracking and Documentation. To comply with the City of Temecula Noise Ordinance, noise levels from amplified speakers shall be limited to a maximum of 84 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet, and the speaker location shall be limited to the southeast corner of the Pavilion. A designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall complete a noise measurement 50 feet downstream from (or directly in front of) the amplified speakers and ensure the noise level does not exceed 84 dBA Leq. A noise meter or cellular device -based decibel meter application shall be utilized to complete the noise measurement and adjust the speaker output volume. The speaker volume shall be adjusted to ensure that the maximum permissible noise level of 84 dBA Leq is not exceeded. The designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall maintain a logbook documenting the date and time of calibration (84 dBA at 50 feet) for each event that occurs. The designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall maintain each record for 90 days from the date of calibration. Upon request by the City of Temecula Code Enforcement, and only after the filing of a formal noise complaint by an adjacent resident, the logbook shall be provided to the City for verification. This calibration does not supersede Condition of Approval no. 13 in this document.

15. Display of Conditional Use Permit. The City of Temecula Approval Letter for the Conditional Use Permit shall be displayed on the premises in a conspicuous place so that law enforcement and city staff entering the establishment may readily see the Conditional Use Permit. A copy of the stamped approved floor plan/site plan approved with the Conditional Use Permit and the full set of Conditionals of Approval (including all previous approvals) shall always be kept on the premises and made available at the request of any law enforcement officer, fire marshal, code officer, or deputy fire marshal.

Outside Agencies

16. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the requirements set forth by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. These requirements shall include:
1). Applicant shall pull appropriate food permits for events open to the public and that approved caterers are utilized for private events.

2. The site shall operate in accordance with Resolution 91-474 for trash and restroom availability.

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
General Requirements

17. Obtain Permits Prior to Event. Applicant must obtain all permits and inspections for required work noted above prior to event during regular City business hours.

18. Signage. All signs for this event to be approved by the City of Temecula Planning Department.

19. Off -site Signage. No off -site signs are allowed in the City of Temecula.

Page 4 of 8 ends

20. Signage Prohibited in Right of Way. No signs are to be placed in the public right-of-way.

21. Reauired Restroom. Toilet facilities for events where alcohol is not available MALE
FEMALE
Patrons
Toilets
Urinals
Toilets Sinks
50-100
1 1
1 1
100-200
1 1
2 1
201-400
2 2
3 2
400-500
3 3
4 3
Toilet facilities
for events where alcohol is available
MALE
FEMALE
Patrons
Toilets
Urinals
Toilets Sinks
50-100
1 1
2 1
100-200
2 2
3 2
201-400
3 3
5 3
400-500
4 4
6 3
Accessible Toilets
ADA Required (Combined male & female)
1-6 1
6-12 2
Duration of Event
Quantity Required
More than 8 hours
100%
6-8 hours
80%
4-6 hours
75%
Less than 4 hours
70%

22. Stages. Stages are required to be accessible by ramp or lift. Show on stage plans how this will be achieved.

23. Music/Sound Equipment. All musical/ sound system equipment is to be supported by listed rigging only. No Genie lifts.

24. Tents. Submit three copies of the plans and structural calculations for any proposed temporary structures over 399 square feet to the Building and Safety Department for review and approval.

The structural plans and calculations shall be wet signed by the engineer of record. Show all exits on plans.

25. Temporary Electrical. Provide two copies of electrical plans for any proposed temporary electrical equipment for review and approval. The electrical plans shall be stamped and wet signed by a registered professional engineer or architect licensed by the State of California or by the licensed electrical contractor completing the work. Electrical generators require permits and inspections with two means of grounding. Please show all generator KVA size, phase (3 phase, or single phase), and voltage. All electrical cords are to be listed for the use, protected and secured.

26. Inspection Times. Obtain all permits and inspections for required work noted above prior to event during regular City business hours.

27. ADA Van Access. Provide details of van accessible parking located as close as possible to the access aisle.

28. Generator(s). Electrical generators require permits and inspections with two means of grounding. All electrical cords are to be listed for the use, protected and secured.

Page 5 of 8 ends

POLICE DEPARTMENT
General Requirements

29. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. The applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited.

30. Ensure No Alcohol Sold or Consumed by Person Under the Age of 21. The applicant shall ensure that no alcohol is sold to or consumed by any person under the age of 21.

31. Identification Verification. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid California driver's license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card (active/reserve/retired/dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency.

32. Inspections. Police officers, sheriff's deputies and ABC investigators are sworn law enforcement officers (peace officers) with powers of arrest. Whether in plain clothes or uniform, peace officers have the legal right to visit and inspect any licensed premises at any time during business hours without a search warrant or probable cause. This includes inspecting the bar and back bar, store room, office, closed or locked cabinets, safes, kitchen, or any other area within the licensed premises. It is legal and reasonable for licensees to exclude the public from some areas of the premises. However, licensees cannot and must not deny entry to, resist, delay, obstruct, or assault a peace officer (Sections 25616, 25753, and 25755 B&P; 148 and 241 (b) PC).

33. Acceptable Forms of Identification. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is an acceptable form of identification for confirming the age of person, providing it complies with Section 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B&P), which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) currently valid (not expired).

It is the responsibility of the business owner and any person who serves or sells alcohol to be aware of current laws and regulations pertaining to alcoholic beverages.

34. Section 303 (a) (PC). On -sale licensees may not: (a) employ hosts, hostesses, or entertainers who solicit others to buy them drinks, alcoholic or non-alcoholic; (b) pay or agree to pay such an employee a percentage of the receipts from the sales of drinks solicited; (c) permit any person whether an employee or not, to loiter for the purpose of soliciting an alcoholic drink.

Page 6 of 8 ends

35. Maintain Premises as a Bona Fide Eating Place. Type 41, 47 and 49 licensees must operate and maintain their licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. They must make actual and substantial sale of meals, during the normal meal hours that they are open, at least five days a week. Normal meal hours are: breakfast 6:00 a.m. — 9:00 a.m., lunch 11:00 a.m. —2:00 p.m., and dinner 6:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the days they are open. The premises must be equipped and maintained in good faith. This means the premises must possess working refrigeration and cooking devices, pots, pans, utensils, table service, condiment dispensers, menus, posters, signs, and enough goods to make substantial meals. The premises must comply with all regulations of the local health department. Incidental, sporadic or infrequent sales of meals or a mere offering of meals without actual sales is not compliance. "Meals" means the usual assortment of food commonly ordered at various hours of the day. The service of only sandwiches or salads is not considered compliance. However, certain specialty entrees, such as pizza, fish or ribs, and an assortment of other foods, such as soups, salads or desserts, maybe considered a meal. The Department will presume that a licensee is operating as a bona fide eating place if the gross sales of food prepared and sold to guests on the premises exceeds the gross sales of alcoholic beverages. "Prepared" means any processing preliminary to the final serving of food. (Note: Some licensees have a "conditional" license that requires food sales to be 50% or more of the total gross sales Sections 23038 and 23787 B&P).

36. No Alcohol Sales Between 2:00 am and 6:00 am. Licensees may not sell, give, or deliver alcohol (by the drink or by the package) between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day. No person may knowingly purchase alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. Section 25631 B&P Code). Licensees may not permit patrons or employees to consume alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day (even if someone bought the drinks before 2:00 a.m. Section 25632 B&P). Some ABC licenses have special conditions (restrictions) as to hours of sale that are stricter than the law. Those licenses are marked "Conditional" (23805 B&P).

37. Disorderly House. Licensees may not permit their licensed premises to become a disorderly house. A disorderly house is a licensed outlet (on or off sale) that: (a) disturbs neighbors with noise, loud music, loitering, littering, vandalism, urination or defecation, graffiti, etc.; and/or (b) has many ongoing crimes inside such as drunks, fights, assaults, prostitution, narcotics, etc.

The licensed premise includes the parking lot (Section 25601 B&P; 316 PC).

38. Employee Training for Identification Checks. The applicant shall ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages is trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employers and employees involved in the service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new employees. Contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506-5132 to set up a training date. Training must be completed prior to the grand opening of this business and periodic updated training when new employees/ management are hired.

Page 7 of 8 ends

39. Entertainment Rules. On -sale licensees who offer entertainment must abide by the following rules: (1) No licensee shall permit any person to perform acts of or acts which simulate; (a) sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation or any sexual acts which are prohibited by law; (b) the touching, caressing or fondling on the breast, buttocks, anus or genitals; (c) the displaying of the pubic hair, anus, vulva or genitals; and (2) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (1) hereof, entertainers whose breasts and/or buttocks are exposed to view shall perform only upon a stage at least 18 inches above the immediate floor level and removed at least six feet from the nearest patron. No licensee shall permit any person to remain in or upon the licensed premises who exposes to public view any portion of her or her genitals or anus (Rule 143.3 CCR. Also violates Section 311.6 PC if conduct is "obscene," e.g. intercourse, sodomy, masturbation, etc.)

40. Under Number of Calls for Service. Licensees may not permit their licensed premises to be a problem for the local law enforcement agency by needing an undue number of calls for service.

The licensed premise includes the parking lot (Sections 24200 (a) (B&P).

41. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506-5132.

Page 8 of 8 ends

ORDINANCE NO.2026-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE REDHAWK SPECIFIC

PLAN TO ALLOW WEDDING/SPECIAL EVENTS USES

ASSOCIATED AT THE GOLF COURSE AND ADD
RELATED STANDARDS FOR THOSE USES ON A 100.9
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 45100 REDHAWK
PARKWAY (APN: 962-040-012)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

A. On June 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application No. PA23-0251, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wedding/event center to be operated as part of an existing golf course. On August 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application No. PA23-0327, a Specific Plan Amendment for the Redhawk Specific Plan to provide a revision to uses associated with the golf course and add related standards for those uses. Both applications were submitted in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The applications will be referred to collectively as "the Project".

B. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").

C. The City contracted with Kimley-Horn for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, Kimley-Horn and City staff concluded that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, but that mitigation measures could be implemented to reduce such impacts to a less than significant level. Based upon this determination, Kimley-Horn prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration ("Draft MND") in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

D. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.

E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted

Resolution Nos. 2026-07, 2026-08, and 2026-09 recommending that the City Council approve PA23-0251, PA25-0327, and the Final MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program F. On July 14, 2026, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project, the Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony, and any comments received regarding the Project, Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prior to and at the public hearing.

G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026- "A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the hereby makes the following findings regarding the zone change:

A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. Goal 7 speaks of having "Community gathering areas which provide for the social, civic, cultural and recreational needs of the community. Specifically, Policy 7.4 encourages common areas and facilities within residential developments that provide gathering areas for social and recreational activities. The proposed wedding and event center is consistent with this goal and policy. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies, and objectives.

B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City s General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Redhawk Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The amendment won't be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because mitigation has been placed on the project. This

mitigation will ensure that noise levels are within the City's acceptable range. In addition, the amendment is placing limits on the use that do not currently exist. These include, limiting the number of events to no more than three per week and limiting the number of guests in attendance to 130 persons.

C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.

The Specific Plan amendment will not require any physical modifications in order to allow for the wedding/event center as this use will be allowed in the outdoor covered pavilion. All appropriate infrastructure is already in place. As such, the project has been reviewed based on existing structures and infrastructure. The new uses are physically suitable for the land use designations proposed by the amended Redhawk Specific Plan.

D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.

The amendment will allow for the ability of the golf course to conduct weddings and other events.

These types of events are typical of golf courses and as such will be compatible with the character of the existing development and land uses. The pavilion is located approximately 300 feet from the nearest residential property line. Mitigation has been included with the project that will limit speaker volume to a maximum of 84 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. In addition, speakers shall be limited to the southeast corner of the pavilion.

Section 3. Specific Plan Amendment. The City Council hereby amends the Redhawk Specific Plan (Planning Area 36) to read as provided in Exhibit "A", attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein as set forth in full.

Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance.

Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of ,
, Mayor
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2026- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 14th day of July, 2026, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk

Redhawk Specific Plan
SP 9
(Formally Specific Plan No. 217)
Amendment No. 2 (PA23-0327)
II. Specific Plan
B. Development Plans and Standards

1. Community Level Development Standards
c. Open Space and Recreation Standards
o Standards
*Golf Course (Planning Area 36) shall be developed on approximately 182.7 acres. a) The golf course shall consist of 18 holes and a club house. An outdoor covered pavilion shall be allowed for hosting golf events as well as events listed below. In addition to the uses permitted in Ordinance No. 348.2928, wedding facilities shall also be permitted upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Wedding facilities may also be used to host private events, including but not limited to the events listed below.
• Weddings and related wedding events (e.g., bridal shower, rehearsal dinner, etc.) • Birthdays
• Anniversaries
• Corporate Functions
• Community Events
In the event that a similar use is proposed that is not listed above, the Community Development Director shall be allowed to make a consistency determination. b) The golf course shall be completed as a part of Phase II. c) Refer to Exhibit II-3, Planning Area 36 - Golf Course. d) Refer to Section II. B. 1. i. Landscaping Plan.
e) Parking for the golf course shall be required per Ordinance No. 348 (6 spaces/hole). f) Parking for the outdoor covered pavilion shall be required at 1 space/70 square feet. 40 PC RESOLUTION NO.2026-07

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT

THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE REDHAWK SPECIFIC

PLAN AMENDMENT GENERALLY LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET FROM THE REDHAWK

PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY
INTERSECTION (APN: 962-040-012)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

B. The project site is approximately 100 acres and generally located approximately 1,500 feet from the Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch Parkway Intersection.

C. The applications were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").

Notice of Intent for the Draft MND in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, Ca 92590, Chamber of Commerce, located at 26790 Ynez Court, Suite A, Temecula CA 92591, Ronald Roberts Public Library, located at 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula, CA 92592, and on the City of Temecula website.

G. During the comment period, the City received two written comments on the Draft MND from various agencies, individuals, and organizations and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission, and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings.

H. The "Final Mitigated Negative Declaration" ("Final MND") consists of the Draft MND, response to comments, and all of its appendices and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The Final MND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies on September 22, 2025, which is at least 10 days prior to certification of the Final MND, in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.5(a).

1. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final MND and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter.

Section 2. Findings. After due consideration of the Final MND and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission hereby finds and resolves that:

A. All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full.

B. Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Draft MND, the Final MND and on the Project. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.

C. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference, and which includes the written comments on the Draft MND the Final MND and its Appendices, staff reports and presentations and all oral and written testimony.

D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Final MND and all comments received regarding the Final MND prior to and at the May 6, 2026 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final MND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there

is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Final MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.

E. The Planning Commission, in the exercise of its independent judgment, recommends that the City Council adopt the Final MND, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. The Planning Commission further recommends that the mitigation measures set forth therein be made applicable to the Project.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6"' day of May, 2026.
r
Lanae Turley rejo, Ch r
ATTEST:

Matt Peters
Secretary
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2026-07 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 61h day of May, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Solis, Turley-Trejo NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Matics, Watson
uK�
Matt Peters
Secretary

RESOLUTION NO.2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF TEMECULA ADOPT THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE

REDHAWK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT GENERALLY
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET FROM THE

REDHAWK PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY
INTERSECTION (APN: 962-040-012)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

B. The project site is approximately 100 acres and generally located approximately 1,500 feet from the Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch Parkway Intersection.

F. The City circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt the Draft MND, along with the MND and its Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day comment period

between June 30, 2025 through July 30, 2025. A Notice of Intent was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of June 30, 2025 through July 30, 2025. The City published a Notice of Intent for the Draft MND in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, Chamber of Commerce, located at 26790 Ynez Court, Suite A, Temecula, CA 92591, Ronald Roberts Public Library, located at 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula, CA 92592, and on the City of Temecula website.

I. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final MND and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter.

K. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2026-07 recommending that the City Council adopt the Final MND and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution Nos. 2026-08, and 09, thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of a Specific Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit.

L. Prior to taking action at the noticed City Council public hearing held on May 26, 2026, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, as well as oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information to support a fair argument requiring additional environmental review or re -circulation of the Final MND under CEQA because no new significant environmental impacts were identified, nor was any substantial increase in the severity of any previously disclosed environmental impacts identified.
2 Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California does hereby find, determine and declare that:

A. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full.

D. The City Council has reviewed the Final MND and all comments received regarding the Final MND prior to and at the May 26, 2026 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final MND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment following imposition of the mitigation that has been proposed and is included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and (3) the Final MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council.

F. The City Council hereby directs staff to file a Notice of Determination as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21152(a).
3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of ,
Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
A.1 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
The purpose of this program is to identify the changes to the project, which the Lead Agency has adopted or made a condition of a project approval, in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The City of Temecula is the Lead Agency that must adopt the mitigation monitoring and reporting program. Section 21069 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statute defines Responsible Agency as a public agency, other than the Lead Agency, which has the responsibility for carrying out or approving a project.

CECIA statutes and Guidelines provide direction for clarifying and managing the complex relationships between a Lead Agency and other agencies with respect to implementing and monitoring mitigation measures. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(d) "when making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1) of CEQA, the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures."
Furthermore, Section 15097.d states "each agency has the discretion to choose its own approach to monitoring or reporting; and each agency has its own special expertise." This discretion will be exercised by implementing agencies at the time they undertake any of the individual improvement projects identified in the Draft IS/MND.

A completed and signed checklist for each measure indicates that a measure has been implemented and fulfills the City's monitoring requirements with respect to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6.

A.2 ACRONYMS AND INITIATIONS
dB(A) decibel A -weighted
Leq "equivalent continuous level"
NOI Noise
Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment

NOISE MEASURES
Measures
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
MM N0I-1: In order to comply with the City of Temecula Noise Ordinance, noise levels from amplified speakers shall be limited to a maximum of 84 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet, and the speaker location shall be limited to the southeast corner of the Pavilion. A designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall complete a noise measurement at 50 feet downstream from (or directly in front of) the amplified speakers and ensure the noise level does not exceed 84 dBA Leq. A noise meter or cellular device -based decibel meter application shall be utilized to complete the noise measurement and adjust the speaker output volume. The speaker volume shall be adjusted to ensure that the maximum permissible noise level of 84 dBA Leq is not exceeded. The designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall maintain a logbook documenting the date and time of calibration (84 dBA at 50 feet) for each event that occurs. The designated golf course representative/event coordinator shall maintain each record for 90 days from the date of calibration. Upon request by the City of Temecula Code Enforcement, and only after the filing of a formal noise complaint by an adjacent resident, the logbook shall be provided to the City for verification.

Redhawk Golf Course - Specific Plan Amendment
Project Applicant
(designated golf course
representative/event
coordinator)
City of Temecula Code
Enforcement
of Compliance
Prior to each Pavilion
Event (event setup)
Signature and Date of

PC RESOLUTION NO.2026-08

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, "AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

TEMECULA AMENDING THE REDHAWK SPECIFIC

PLAN TO ALLOW WEDDING/SPECIAL EVENTS USES

ASSOCIATED AT THE GOLF COURSE AND ADD
RELATED STANDARDS FOR THOSE USES ON A 100.9

ACRE PARCEL GENERALLY LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET SOUTH OF THE

REDHAWK PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY
INTERSECTION (APN: 962-040-012)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

A. On June 15, 2023 James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application No. PA23-0251, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wedding/event center to be operated as part of an existing golf course. On August 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application PA23-0327, a Specific Plan Amendment for the Redhawk Specific Plan to allow wedding/special event uses at the golf course and add related standards for those uses. Both applications were submitted in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The above referenced applications will be referred to collectively as "the Project".

B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act.

C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on May 6, 2026, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.

D. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 2. Environmental Compliance Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment Application No. PA23-0327:

A. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").

B. The City contracted with Kimley-Horn for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information

contained in the Initial Study, Kimley-Horn and City staff concluded that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, but that mitigation measures could be implemented to reduce such impacts to a less than significant level. Based upon this determination, Kimley-Horn prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration ("Draft MND") in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

C. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and considered the Draft MND, response to comments, and all of its appendices (collectively, the Final MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.

D. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2026-07, "A

RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA

RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

PREPARED FOR THE REDHAWK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET FROM THE REDHAWK PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY INTERSECTION (APN: 962-040-012)".

Section 3. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval the Specific Plan Amendment Application No. PA23-0327, hereby finds, determines and declares that: Specific Plan Amendment Application No. PA23-0327 is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City:

A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.

B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Redhawk

Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The amendment won't be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because mitigation has been placed on the project.

This mitigation will ensure that noise levels are within in the City's acceptable range. In addition, the amendment is placing limits on the use that do not currently exist. These include, limiting the number of events to no more than three per week and limiting the number of guests in attendance to 130 persons.

C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.

D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.

The project site is already developed with a golf course and related amenities such as a restaurant, clubhouse and pro shop. The golf course currently allows for golf -related events at the pavilion. These include, tournaments, trophy presentations, and other golf -related social events. The amendment will allow for the ability of the golf course to conduct weddings and other events. These types of events are typical of golf courses and as such will be compatible with the character of the existing development and land uses. The pavilion is located approximately 300 feetfrom the nearest residential property line. Mitigation has been included with the project that will limit speaker volume to a maximum of 84 dBA at a distance of 50 feet.

In addition, speakers shall be limited to the southeast corner of the pavilion.

Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE REDHAWK

SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW WEDDING/SPECIAL EVENTS USES ASSOCIATED AT THE GOLF COURSE AND ADD RELATED STANDARDS FOR THOSE USES ON A 100.9 ACRE PARCEL GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET SOUTH OF THE REDHAWK PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY INTERSECTION (APN: 962-040- 012)". The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amend the Redhawk Specific Plan in substantially the same form as attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A".

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 61h day of May 2026.
r
Lanae Turley -Tr o, hair
ATTEST:

P�
qA d'---
Matt Peters
Secretary
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2026-08 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 61h day of May 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Solis, Turley-Trejo NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Matics, Watson
Matt Peters
Secretary

ORDINANCE NO.2026-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE REDHAWK SPECIFIC

PLAN TO ALLOW WEDDING/SPECIAL EVENTS USES

ASSOCIATED AT THE GOLF COURSE AND ADD
RELATED STANDARDS FOR THOSE USES ON A 100.9

ACRE PARCEL GENERALLY LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET SOUTH OF THE

REDHAWK PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY
INTERSECTION (APN: 962-040-012)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

A. On June 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application No. PA23-0251, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wedding/event center to be operated as part of an existing golf course. On August 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application No. PA23-0327, a Specific Plan Amendment for the Redhawk Specific Plan to provide a revision to uses associated with the golf course and add related standards for those uses. Both applications were submitted in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The applications will be referred to collectively as "the Project".

E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. 2026-07, 2026-08 and 2026-09 recommending that the City Council approve PA23-0251, PA25-0327, and the Final MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program F. On , 2026, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project, the Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony, and any comments received regarding the Project, Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prior to and at the public hearing.

G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026- "A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the hereby makes the following findings regarding the zone change:

A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.

B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

and welfare. The amendment won't be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because mitigation has been placed on the project. This mitigation will ensure that noise levels are within the City's acceptable range. In addition, the amendment is placing limits on the use that do not currently exist. These include, limiting the number of events to no more than three per week and limiting the number of guests in attendance to 130 persons.

C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.

D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.

The amendment will allow for the ability of the golf course to conduct weddings and other events.

Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of 52026.

Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2026- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2026, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk

EXHIBIT A
Redhawk Specific Plan
SP 9
(Formally Specific Plan No. 217)
Amendment No. 2 (PA23-0327)
II. Specific Plan
B. Development Plans and Standards

1. Community Level Development Standards
c. Open Space and Recreation Standards
o Standards
*Golf Course (Planning Area 36) shall be developed on approximately 182.7 acres. a) The golf course shall consist of 18 holes and a club house. An outdoor covered pavilion shall be allowed for hosting golf events as well as events listed below. In addition to the uses permitted in Ordinance No. 348.2928, wedding facilities shall also be permitted upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Wedding facilities may also be used to host private events, including but not limited to the events listed below.
■ Weddings and related wedding events (e.g., bridal shower, rehearsal dinner, etc.) • Birthdays
* Anniversaries
• Corporate Functions
• Community Events
In the event that a similar use is proposed that is not listed above, the Community Development Director shall be allowed to make a consistency determination. b) The golf course shall be completed as a part of Phase II. c) Refer to Exhibit II-3, Planning Area 36 - Golf Course. d) Refer to Section II. B. 1. i. Landscaping Plan.
e) Parking for the golf course shall be required per Ordinance No. 348 (6 spaces/hole). f) Parking for the outdoor covered pavilion shall be required at 1 space/70 square feet. 40 PC RESOLUTION NO.2026-09

RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED, "A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

TEMECULA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(PA23-0251) TO ALLOW A WEDDING/EVENT CENTER TO

BE OPERATED AS PART OF AN EXISTING GOLF
COURSE GENERALLY LOCATED AT 45100 REDHAWK
PARKWAY (APN: 962-040-012)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act.

D. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Conditional Use Permit Application PA23-0251:

A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a (Mitigated) Negative Declaration was prepared.

B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on June 30, 2025, and expired on July 30, 2025. Copies of the documents have

been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590.

C. Two written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings.

D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the May 6, 2026 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.

E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby adopted Resolution No. 2026-07 "A RESOLUTION OF THE OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY

COUNCIL ADOPT THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION

MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE REDHAWK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET

FROM THE REDHAWK PARKWAY AND VAIL RANCH PARKWAY INTERESECTION (APN: 962-040-012)".

Section 3. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit Application No. PA23-0251, hereby finds, determines and declares that:

Conditional Use Permit Application No. PA23-0251 is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City:

Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.010.E A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code.

The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared

for the project. This document indicates that all impacts to the adjacent uses, buildings or structures can be mitigated to a less than significant level. The pavilion is located approximately 300 feet from the nearest residential property line. Mitigation has been included with the project that will limit speaker volume to a maximum of 84 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. In addition, speakers shall be limited to the southeast corner of the pavilion.

D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community.

The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use was based on substantial evidence in view of the record as whole before the City Council.

Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving Planning Application No. PA23- 0251, a Conditional Use Permit allow a wedding/event center to be operated as part of the existing golf course located at 45100 Temecula Parkway within the Redhawk Specific Plan subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6 h day of May 2026.

WrW
f f' `1 W.�.

ATTEST:

Matt eters
Secretary
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2026-09 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of May 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:

NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
Hagel, Solis, Turley-Trejo
None
None
ABSENT: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Matics, Watson
Matt Peters
Secretary

RESOLUTION NO.2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF TEMECULA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (PA23-0251) TO ALLOW A WEDDING/EVENT

CENTER TO BE OPERATED AS PART OF AN EXISTING
GOLF COURSE GENERALLY LOCATED AT 45100
REDHAWK PARKWAY (APN: 962-040-012)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:

A. On June 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application No. PA23-0251, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wedding/event center to be operated as part of an existing golf course. On August 15, 2023, James Wood, on behalf of Redhawk Golf Course, filed Planning Application PA23-0327, a Specific Plan Amendment for the Redhawk Specific Plan to allow wedding/special event uses at the golf course and add related standards for those uses. Both applications were submitted in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Both applications will be referred to collectively as "the Project".

B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act.

E. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.

F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted

Resolution Nos. 2026-07 ,2026-08, and 2026-09 recommending that the City Council approve PA23-0251, PA23-0327 and the Final MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

G. On , 2026, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project, the Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project, Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prior to and at the public hearing.