ATTACHMENT #2
Project Name: Campus Master Plan Site Strategy
and Phasing
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS
AND
RRM Design Group
Contract No. 13197-2023
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Agreement for Professional Services entered into between the CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, a municipal corporation, (hereafter “City”) and RRM DESIGN GROUP (“Consultant”), entitled Campus Master Plan Phasing and dated March 1, 2023 (herein “Contract”) is made this 15th day of November, 2023.
RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into the agreement for Professional Services on March 1, 2023 for Campus Master Plan Phasing.
B. Section 3 of Contract provides for a “not to exceed” amount of $74,537 for services generally and briefly described in Section 2 as base mapping, a design charrette, street alignment study, and phasing exploration.
C. City is in need of revising and expanding the Scope of Work to be performed under the present Contract and adding $536,355 additional compensation for Consultant. Consultant is desirous of performing such and receiving additional compensation for said services.
D. City is in need of updating Section 5 of Contract to name the current project manager.
E. Contract expires December 31, 2023 and there is a need to extend the Contract.
F. City and Consultant desire to revise and expand the Scope of Work and increase the Agreement not to exceed amount to $610,892 extend the date of the Contract, and update the City’s project manager while keeping all other terms intact.
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
AGREEMENT TO AMEND
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties to Contract agree to amend Contract as described below:
Part 1. The Contract is extended for a period of one year and Section 5 is hereby amended to read as follows:
The term of this Agreement is from the date first written above to December 31, 2024, unless the term of this Agreement is extended or the Agreement is terminated as provided for herein.
Part 2. Section 2 of Contract is amended to include the additional Scope of Work and Exhibit A is hereby replaced by Exhibit A-1, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 2 shall now read in its entirety as follows:
2. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
The services to be performed by Consultant are as follows:
Professional services in conjunction with Civic Arts Plaza Master Plan Site Strategy and Phasing. Services and deliverables shall generally include the tasks outlined in tasks 1 through 9, which are more particularly set forth in the Scope of Work, attached as Exhibit A-1, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Part 3. The sum of $536,355 is added to the Contract not to exceed amount.
Section 3 of the Contract is hereby amended to revise the Schedule of Fees and Exhibit B is hereby replaced by Exhibit B-1, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 3 shall now read in its entirety as follows:
3. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT
(a)Maximum and Rate. The total compensation payable to Consultant by City for the services under this Agreement SHALL NOT EXCEED the sum of $610,892 (herein "not to exceed amount"), and shall be earned as the work progresses on the following basis:
Hourly, at the hourly rates and with reimbursement to Consultant for those expenses set forth in Consultant’s Schedule of Fees, attached as Exhibit “B-1” and incorporated herein. The rates and expenses set forth in that exhibit shall be binding upon Consultant for the term of this Agreement
(b)Payment. Consultant shall provide City with written verification of the actual compensation earned, in a form satisfactory to City's Project Manager. Invoices shall be made no more frequently than on a monthly basis, and describe the work CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
performed (including, if applicable, a list of hours worked by personnel classification). All payments shall be made within 30 days after City’s approval of the invoice. (c)Extra Services. Additional work not reasonably encompassed by the Scope of Services described in Section 2 may be agreed upon only by execution of a written Amendment to this Agreement. No liability or right to compensation for extra services shall exist without such Amendment. Unless otherwise stated in the Amendment, applicable rates for extra services shall be at the rates set forth in Exhibit B-1.
Part 4. Section 5 “City Project Manager and Services by City” is hereby amended to include the name of the current project manager and shall now read as follows:
4. CITY PROJECT MANAGER
The services to be performed by Consultant shall be accomplished under the general direction of, and coordinate with City’s “Project Manager”, as that staff person is designated by City from time to time, and who is presently Akbar Alikhan, Deputy City Manager.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this First Amendment to Contract as of the date set forth above.
CONSULTANT
Erik P. Justesen
CEO
Debbie Rudd
Senior Vice President
CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS
ATTEST: Kevin McNamee, Mayor
Laura B. Maguire, City Clerk
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
APPROVED AS TO ADMINISTRATION
Andrew P. Powers
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Office of City Attorney
Patrick J. Hehir,
Chief Assistant City Attorney
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Exhibit A-1 Scope of Work
Project Understanding
This project addresses several facets of refined study in the city’s process of implementing the Civic Arts Plaza (CAP) Campus Master Plan consistent with the goals and vision set forth in the Thousand Oaks Downtown Core Master Plan endorsed by City Council on June 5, 2018. This work effort is intended to further analyze the design and engineering assumptions made in previous planning efforts, and refine the conceptual design based on the existing physical and economic conditions. These efforts will quantify and refine the project components, confirm programming assumptions for existing and proposed spaces, and identify a potential implementation and phasing strategy to achieve the City’s goals for the site. The following is an outline of the anticipated components to be analyzed this Scope of Work, and specific tasks and deliverables are described in further detail below.
1. Existing Civic Center - Renovation and Adaptive Re-Use Potential a. Grand stair concept
b. Carpenter Courtyard and breakroom
c. Arcade concept
d. Façade renovations
2. New City Hall
a. Space needs analysis (revisit previous work to verify assumptions) b. Uses and allocation per floor, and how overall building plans may need to be adjusted
3. Refine park and plaza spaces
4. Street design, parking structure access, and connections to adjacent areas a. Conceptual grading and design for new parking access route and connection to Schere service court
b. Conceptual design of streetscape at TO Blvd to accommodate diagonal parking and pedestrian improvements
c. Conceptual design for enhanced intersection at Dallas Drive and TO Blvd
5. Amphitheater
6. Mixed-Use Building
7. Pad Buildings
8. Public Market
The goal of this effort is to strategically analyze the anticipated plans, and identify an implementable phasing strategy for the City to use as a guide toward achieving the development goals and vision of the Downtown Core and CAP Campus Master Plans.
TASK 1: Project Management and Meetings
Subtask 1.1 Project Management and Coordination
RRM Design Group’s (RRM) project manager and key team members will coordinate with City staff, subconsultants, and other City departments, as necessary, on an ongoing basis over the course of this next stage of the project. This task includes ongoing project coordination efforts, general correspondence, video conferencing (not specifically included in other tasks), and updating and summarizing notes in support of City staff as we move through the project.
Deliverables:
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Project management, memos, meeting minutes, schedule updates and general correspondence for document control
Subtask 1.2: Client Meetings
RRM’s project manager and appropriate team members, as the subject matter dictates, will prepare for and facilitate up to ten meetings, as needed, with City staff. These meetings will provide an opportunity to review, discuss, and clarify issues and review comments so that work may proceed in an efficient manner.
Deliverables:
Up to one (1) in-person and/or site visit meeting
Preparation and attendance at up to ten (10) meetings with City staff (assumes virtual meetings) TASK 2 : Conceptual Analysis of Existing Buildings
Subtask 2.1 Analysis of Proposed Alterations
RRM will provide conceptual architectural, space, and circulation analysis of existing City Hall buildings and spaces where potential alterations may occur. Study of these items will inform refinements necessary to the overall building and site design. The analysis is anticipated to include studies, diagrams and listing of possible constraints and opportunities.
Task to include additional 3D modeling of portions of the existing buildings to be affected, for use in preparing exhibits
Report identifying the general architectural feasibility of the proposed alterations for each of the following components
oExisting Carpenter Courtyard area and City staff break room o“Arcade” concept on first floor of City Hall
oGrand staircase concept
oRooftop terrace conversion (former rooftop fountain)
oAdministration Building facade improvements
oKavli Theater portico
oExisting Parking structure
Deliverables:
Architectural analysis report and recommendations to support and inform refinements to Master Plan conceptual design
Subtask 2.2 Structural Recommendations for Proposed Alterations RRM Structural Engineering will provide an assessment of the existing structure in the context of the anticipated alterations. This assessment will be cross referenced to the California Existing Building Code, the current version of the California Building Code and the as-built design. Results from the assessment will be shared with the team to further hone proposed revisions to the Master Plan conceptual design.
Deliverables:
Structural analysis report and recommendations to support and inform refinements to conceptual design.
TASK 3. Master Plan Programming and Concept Refinements Subtask 3.1 Space Needs Verification
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
RRM will review the existing space needs analysis prepared by AECOM and coordinate with City staff to verify the findings remain valid. Should adjustments need to be considered, RRM will incorporate direction provided by City staff into the conceptual floor and building plan refinements as part of task
3.2 below.
Deliverables:
Summary memorandum of potential adjustments to space needs analysis as identified in coordination with City staff
Subtask 3.2: Building and Floor Plan Refinements
RRM will prepare refined conceptual floor and building plans based on the analysis completed in tasks above. Floor plans will be diagrammatic to represent general space needs allocation, interconnectivity of adjacent spaces, and relationships to exterior features.
Deliverables:
Conceptual refinement of one (1) proposed new City Hall building, floor plans, interior spaces, connections, anticipated uses, and other features affecting overall site plan layout Conceptual refinement to proposed building massing, orientation, layout, and connectivity Coordination with City’s Geotechnical Engineer and review of soils report findings This task excludes floor plans for a potential housing/mixed-use component Subtask 3.3: Architectural Design Character Studies
RRM will prepare conceptual architectural character studies illustrating thematic components in various design styles to help the City identify a cohesive character for the redevelopment of the campus.
Deliverables:
Coordinate with staff to explore design pallets for architectural character of civic, commercial, and residential mixed-use buildings.
Architectural elements, exterior materials, opportunities for unique features. Prepare materials and color pallet to allow for variety of design response Prepare modified modeling to represent the recommended design refinements Up to four (4) renderings (each) representing up to three (3) distinctive architectural styles. At this time, we anticipate preparing character studies in the following architectural styles:
oAmerican Urban
oSpanish Revival
oCurrent concept (Contemporary Urban)
TASK 4: Site Development Analysis & Refinement
Subtask 4.1: Site Plan Refinement
Utilizing the AECOM CAP Master Plan and RRM’s subsequent studies, RRM’s Civil Engineering and Landscape Architecture teams will further analyze anticipated the site design to inform refinements to the pedestrian-centered spaces, streetscape improvements, and connections to the proposed buildings.
Conceptual refinement of the site plan will focus on the following areas:
Pedestrian-centered spaces, including plazas, park areas, playground and amphitheater Streetscape alignment and improvements within the site, including new parking access route and connection to Schere service court
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Streetscape improvements along Thousand Oaks Boulevard to accommodate diagonal parking and enhanced intersection at Dallas Drive and Thousand Oaks Boulevard Pedestrian and vehicular connections to neighboring properties Site design accommodations to maintain existing oak trees Coordination with City’s Geotechnical Engineer and review of soils report findings Deliverables:
Draft Conceptual Site Plan (black and white)
Final Conceptual Site Plan (colored)
Subtask 4.2: Site Design Character and Materials
RRM will develop recommendations for overall site character and style consistent with character studies described in task 3.3 above.
Deliverables:
Color and materials board
Up to four (4) renderings illustrating character of pedestrian spaces Subtask 4.3: Preliminary Grading and Drainage Analysis
RRM will develop a preliminary grading and drainage exhibit analyzing the following components:
Grading analysis and feasibility of proposed elevations and transitions between new and existing grades
Conceptual earthwork quantities
Site sections
Road alignment
Deliverables:
Preliminary grading and drainage exhibit
Subtask 4.4: Preliminary Utility Analysis
RRM will develop a preliminary utility exhibit analyzing the following components:
Site planning and analysis for new wet utility infrastructure strategy (water & sewer) Storm drain facilities
Conceptual water and sewer demand calculations
Deliverables:
Preliminary utility exhibit
Subtask 4.5: Preliminary Circulation Analysis
RRM will develop a preliminary circulation plan exhibit analyzing the following components:
Pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation
Site visibility triangles at intersections
Turning radius and road geometry for standard emergency and delivery vehicles Deliverables:
Preliminary circulation plan exhibit
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Subtask 4.6: Tree Preservation Analysis
In conjunction with the City Arborist, RRM will develop a tree protection strategy for preservation and integration of existing oak trees.
Deliverables:
Tree protection plan including tree disposition table
TASK 5: Regulatory Framework Analysis and Phasing Strategy Subtask 5.1: Regulatory Framework Review and Analysis
RRM will review and analyze applicable City policies, codes and regulations affecting the development goals of the Master Plan, and in coordination with City Planning staff, will identify the constraints, opportunities, and anticipated regulatory adjustments needed to accommodate the City’s goals for the CAP campus.
Deliverables:
Prepare a regulatory analysis identifying existing codes, policies, and standards affecting the City’s development goals for the site
Provide recommendations for anticipated regulatory amendments required to facilitate the proposed CAP campus redevelopment
Subtask 5.2: Project Phasing and Development Strategy
Evaluate the several project components, their interdependency, the regulatory, economic, and legal/title constraints, and anticipated development financing strategies to identify anticipated project phasing to achieve the overall CAP campus redevelopment goals. Identify separate projects, timelines, critical paths, and processes to completion Coordinate with City staff, legal counsel, and outside consultants to identify anticipated legal/title constraints and financing strategies
Deliverables:
Prepare Phasing Plan Exhibit identifying major components anticipated for each phase TASK 6: Document Production
Subtask 6.1 Civic Arts Plaza Campus Summary Analysis and Implementation Plan RRM will compile the information, analyses, plans, graphics, and summary findings of the materials developed as part of this Scope of Work into a comprehensive implementation plan document in 11x17 format.
Deliverables:
One (1) administrative draft Civic Arts Plaza Campus Summary Analysis and Implementation Plan Up to one (1) round of minor revisions to Summary Analysis and Implementation Plan based on City staff feedback
Subtask 6.2 Digital Presentation of CAP Implementation Plan RRM will compile the information, analyses, plans, graphics, and summary findings presented in the Summary Analysis and Implementation plan into a digital presentation formal in PowerPoint for the City’s use in Public Hearings and other forums.
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Deliverables:
One (1) draft PowerPoint presentation of Summary Analysis and Implementation Plan Up to one (1) round of minor revisions to PowerPoint presentation based on City staff feedback TASK 7: Stakeholder Engagement and City Council Hearings Subtask 7.1 Campus Master Plan Ad Hoc Committee and Council Hearings In coordination with City staff RRM will prepare for Ad Hoc Committee and City Council hearings to present progress and/or summary findings of the Implementation Plan.
Deliverables:
Preparation for and attendance at up to two (2) Ad Hoc Committee meetings Preparation for and attendance at up to two (2) City Council hearings TASK 8: Economics Market Analysis and Financing Strategy RRM’s outside subconsultant, Land Econ Group (LEG) will prepare a market economics, financial, and funding assessment of the anticipated CAP campus redevelopment.
Subtask 8.1 Meetings
Inspect the Study Area and attend an in-person kick-off meeting with RRM and City staff to refine scope and clarify objectives.
Attend one in-person work session with RRM in either Ventura, Santa Barbara or Thousand Oaks.
Participate in one in-person presentation to Planning Commission or City Council if requested by City.
Participate in on-line meetings as needed.
Subtask 8.2 Market Analysis
AECOM prepare a Thousand Oaks Civic Plaza Market Validation Analysis in early 2020. Many of the market forecast contained in that study appear to be still reasonable. We will review that study in detail, summarize its key findings and augmented it as required. This augmentation will focus in on areas not addressed by the AECOM study. The new market study tasks would cover the following:
How has the Covid pandemic altered the market potential for the analyzed uses? How much and what type of multi-family demand exist for Civic Center Plaza? Given the site’s proximity and potential visibility from the Ventura Freeway, is there demand for a new hotel? Such a hotel would not only generate substantial transient occupancy tax revenue but would also enhance support for local restaurants and pubs. For civic buildings that may be abandoned for public uses, what is the reuse potential and how much rent can be expected?
Where should selected uses be best located within the Plan Area and what public investments or policy changes would enhance the area’s market potential? LEG will prepare a real estate market analysis designed to take advantage of the Study Area strengths and to compensate for its weaknesses. This would include a market survey of rents, rent per unit and per square foot and sales prices of the relevant development projects within the competitive market area.
Deliverables:
Market potential and development strategy memorandum
Subtask 8.3 Case Studies
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Thousand Oaks has an abundance of retail districts with dated buildings earning modest rents. It is also a city where the population has not grown in recent years. Additional retail development in this context is challenging, and property owners are concerned with new competition. In order to address this concern, we will research multiple cities that have either created or renovated their downtown districts in times of limited market growth. The objective of these three to four case studies is to demonstrate that the new district, in addition to upgrading the physical environment, is achieving rents above the citywide average and has not had a detrimental impact on retail rents in other parts of the city.
Deliverables:
Case studies of successful civic center and/or downtown redevelopment efforts and their impacts memorandum
Subtask 8.4 Financial Analysis
The financial analysis would address the conversion of City properties, or portions thereof, into revenue generating spaces, and the leasing of public lands for private development to create both revenue flow and new pedestrian vitality. For these City properties we would forecast rent potential for reuse of surplus buildings and land lease revenue for surplus land parcels. Typically, the renovation cost would be provided by a cost consultant on the team.
These revenues would be aggregated into an overall cashflow stream and capitalized into a present value to inform the overall funding strategy. In our experience, parking requirements and parking costs will be an important component of the feasibility analysis.
Deliverables:
Financial feasibility of public and private development memorandum Subtask 8.5 Funding Options
Typically, these civic center project show that the site’s revenue generation potential is well short of overall project cost. Our fourth task would be to recommend an overall funding strategy based upon how cities similar to Thousand Oaks have successfully funded new civic center projects over the past 10 to 15 years. We will first screen a large number of California cities that have developed or are in the process of developing such civic centers. We will then identify four to six cities that have demographic and fiscal characteristics similar to Thousand Oaks and discuss their strategies in detail. Their successes and the real estate revenue potential will shape our recommended funding strategy. This memo will also discuss the beneficial impacts of a new civic center and downtown district on the city as a whole.
Deliverables:
Case studies of funding strategies for civic center development memorandum Task 9: Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimating
Subtask 9.1: Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimating
RRM’s outside subconsultant, Leland Saylor Associates (LSA), will prepare a rough order of magnitude cost estimating for each of the primary project components. Estimating will utilize data and estimate templates. An initial draft will be provided, followed by the final ROM estimate, for use in developing the financial analysis project funding options and strategies for the anticipated CAP campus redevelopment.
• Renovation/additions
o Portions of the existing civic center intended to be renovated, of approximately 40,000 sf. • New buildings
o City Hall – ranging from 4 to 6 stories, from 47,000 sf to 70,000 sf o New Mixed-Use
120 apartments 3 and 4 stories, on top of 2 level podium garage, 36,000 sf per level = 72,000 sf
Liner commercial at street front – 10,000 sf
o Public Market Building – 5,400 sf
o Three Additional Infill Buildings – commercial and mixed-use CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Building 1 – 3 stories, 4500 sf each = 13,500 sf
Building 2 – 1 story commercial – 3,500 sf
Building 3 – 2 and 3 stories commercial – 18,000 sf
• New Streets – Reconfigured on-site circulation to include:
o Dallas Drive, Main Street, West Street
o Extended narrow Main Street
o Curved service/promenade
o New access drive behind residential and new city hall, rising from west to entry at existing 5 story parking structure
• New Site work: Total affected site is about 9 acres:
o About 3 acres will be park and public space, including a small rustic amphitheater.
The boulevard frontage will be converted to diagonal parking.
Deliverables:
• One (1) draft ROM Estimate
• One (1) Final ROM Estimate
CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Exhibit B-1 Schedule of Fees
Fee Footnote
Estimated fees for tasks shown as “Time and Materials - Not to Exceed" (T&M/NTE) establish the maximum that will be billed for each task. Amounts billed will reflect actual hours and will not exceed the maximum amount shown without prior approval by the Client.
Project Costs
Task 1: Project Management and Meetings
Subtask 1.1 Project Management and Coordination – $35,800 Subtask 1.2: Client Meetings –$22,950
Task 2: Conceptual Analysis of Existing Buildings
Subtask 2.1: Analysis of Proposed Alterations - $70,580 Subtask 2.2: Structural Recommendations for Proposed Alterations - $17,695 Task 3: Master Plan Programming and Concept Refinements Subtask 3.1: Space Needs Verification - $11,230
Subtask 3.2: Building and Floor Plan Refinements - $19,750 Subtask 3.3: Architectural Design Character Studies - $26,170 Task 4: Site Development Analysis and Refinement
Subtask 4.1: Site Plan Refinement - $56,320
Subtask 4.2: Site Design Character and Materials - $23,030 Subtask 4.3: Preliminary Grading and Drainage Analysis - $19,300 Subtask 4.4: Preliminary Utility Analysis - $15,660
Subtask 4.5: Tree Preservation Analysis - $12,550
Task 5: Regulatory Framework Analysis and Phasing Strategy Subtask 5.1: Regulatory Framework Review and Analysis - $22,400 Subtask 5.2: Project Phasing and Development Strategy - $17,650 Task 6: Document Production
Subtask 6.1: Civic Arts Plaza Campus Summary Analysis and Implementation Plan - $42,300 Subtask 6.2: Digital Presentation of CAP Implementation Plan - $21,950 Task 7: Stakeholder Engagement and City Council Hearings Subtask 7.1: Campus Master Plan Ad Hoc Committee and Council Hearings - $14,020 Task 8: Economics Market Analysis and Financing Strategy Subtask 8.1: Meetings - $6,000
Subtask 8.2: Market Analysis - $14,000
Subtask 8.3: Case Studies - $15,000
Subtask 8.4: Financial Analysis - $10,000
Subtask 8.5 Funding Options - $15,000
Task 9: Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimating
Subtask 9.1 Rough Order of Magnitude of Costing - $22,000
Reimbursable Expenses
Incidental expenses incurred by RRM Design Group or any subconsultant it may hire to perform services for this project are reimbursed by the Client at actual cost plus 10% to cover its overhead and administrative expenses. Reimbursable expenses include, but are not limited to, CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
reproduction costs, postage, shipping, and handling of drawings and documents, long-distance communications, fees paid to authorities having jurisdiction over the project, the expense of any additional insurance requested by Client in excess of that normally carried by RRM Design Group or its subconsultants, travel expenses (transportation/automobile/lodging/meals), and renderings and models. Reimbursable automobile travel mileage will be billed at the current IRS business standard mileage rate.
Estimated Fee:
• $5,000
Subtotal (RRM only): $449,355
Subtotal (Including subconsultants): $531,355
Estimated Reimbursable Expenses: $5,000
Estimated Project Total: $536,355
Adjustment to Hourly Billing Rates
RRM reserves the right to adjust hourly rates on an annual basis.
BILLABLE RATES
ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN
Architect $ 95 - $ 155 Designer I $ 60 - $ 95
Associate Manager of Architecture $ 150 - $ 245 Designer II $ 70 - $ 120 Design Director $ 210 - $ 260 Interior Designer I $ 75 - $ 125 Designer I $ 75 - $ 110 Interior Designer II $ 90 - $ 150 Designer II $ 85 - $ 125 Intern $ 45 - $ 85
Designer III $ 105 - $ 145 Job Captain $ 105 - $ 165
Intern $ 60 - $ 85 Senior Interior Designer $ 110 - $ 195 Job Captain $ 95 - $ 155
Manager of Architecture $ 180 - $ 280 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Principal $ 215 - $ 395 Assistant Designer $ 75 - $ 105 Project Architect $ 135 - $ 210 Associate Designer $ 90 - $ 125 Project Designer $ 115 - $ 200 Designer $ 95 - $ 140
Project Manager $ 120 - $ 190 Design Director $ 140 - $ 235 Senior Architect $ 165 - $ 210 Intern $ 55 - $ 85
Senior Designer $ 140 - $ 180 Landscape Architect $ 115 - $ 160 Senior Project Manager $ 155 - $ 255 Manager of Landscape Architecture $ 165 - $ 245 Principal $ 190 - $ 395
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Principal Landscape Architect $ 135 - $ 205
Associate Engineer $ 115 - $ 175 Senior Landscape Architect $ 125 - $ 185 Construction Inspector $ 135 - $ 175
Designer I $ 55 - $ 105 PLANNING
Designer II $ 75 - $ 125 Assistant Planner $ 100 - $ 130 Designer III (Structural only) $ 95 - $ 135 Associate Planner $ 110 - $ 175 Engineer I $ 95 - $ 140 Intern $ 55 - $ 95
Engineer II $ 115 - $ 165 GIS Specialist $ 80 - $ 165
Land Surveyor $ 115 - $ 170 Senior GIS Specialist $ 105 - $ 200 Manager of Engineering Services $ 170 - $ 280 Manager of Planning $ 190 - $ 265 Manager of Surveying $ 155 - $ 235 Principal $ 240 - $ 475 Party Chief $ 90 - $ 165 Principal Planner $ 175 - $ 245 CMO: 670-80:MH\
3 6
8 4
Principal $ 235 - $ 395 Senior Planner $ 145 - $ 210
Project Engineer $ 125 - $ 185 Senior Urban Designer $ 155 - $ 195 Project Manager $ 150 - $ 245 Urban Designer $ 105 - $ 185 Senior Associate Engineer $ 130 - $ 210
Senior Designer $ 110 - $ 185 CORPORATE SERVICES
Senior Land Surveyor $ 135 - $ 210 Administrative Assistant $ 75 - $ 95 Senior Party Chief $ 145 - $ 230 Administrative Coordinator $ 100 - $ 130 Senior Project Engineer $ 140 - $ 230 Assistant Office Manager $ 90 - $ 135 Supervisor of Surveying $ 145 - $ 230 Chief Executive Officer $ 300 - $ 495 Survey Technician I $ 60 - $ 100 File Clerk/Administrative Support $ 50 - $ 85 Survey Technician II $ 85 - $ 115 Marketing Assistant $ 50 - $ 85 Survey Technician III $ 100 - $ 135 Marketing Coordinator $ 75 - $ 115 Surveying Crew Rates Marketing Manager $ 130 - $ 235
REGULAR Marketing Specialist $ 95 - $ 155
One person w/ GPS or Robotic Workstation $ 125 - $ 175 Office Coordinator $ 75 - $ 130 Two person $ 175 - $ 325 Proposal Coordinator $ 90 - $ 140 Three person $ 235 - $ 415 Receptionist $ 55 - $ 80
PREVAILING WAGE Senior Marketing Specialist $ 135 - $ 170 One person w/ GPS or Robotic Workstation $ 150 - $ 250
Two person $ 225 - $ 370
Three person $ 325 - $ 515