Attachment 1 PC Staff Report Attachments and Supplementals — Thousand Oaks City Council, December 5, 2023 (part 5 of 10)

is proposed – see
the addenda and
errata
151. Nicole Collazo, Air
Quality
Specialist,
VCAPCD
Planning
Division
Chapter 7:

Conservation

Page 141 ends

by the Air Pollution Control Board on December 13, 2022.

Updated language
is proposed – see
the addenda and
errata
152. Nicole Collazo, Air
Quality
Specialist,
VCAPCD
Planning
Division
Chapter 7:

Conservation

Page 142 ends

may cause a nuisance will be major sources of air pollution. The Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines (AQAG) has more language and methodology criteria on siting sensitive land uses to sources of nuisance odors in Section 6.6, Odors.

Updated language
is proposed – see
the addenda and
errata
153. Nicole Collazo, Air
Quality
Specialist,
VCAPCD
Planning
Division
Chapter 7:

Conservation

Page 152 ends

construction equipment are both considered mobile pollution sources. Consider changing the heading to “non-vehicular” or something similar if that was the intention, to capture reductions from sources other than on-road vehicles (cars, trucks, etc.).

Updated language
is proposed – see
the addenda and
errata
154. Wendy Zimmerman Chapter 7:

Conservation
Development in the industrial portion of Newbury Park on the North Side of the 101 freeway does not include enough green landscaping and trees. Plants are being lost to giant buildings and not being replaced. We are facing climate change at one of the fastest rates in the US and TO is not doing enough to provide plants for shade, air quality, visual relief and could also do so to provide food for people and animals. We are also seeing development that will impede access to the trails in the Conejo Canyons system. We are getting ugly cement structures in giant proportions with minimal replacement of needed vegetation. City should demand more vegetation/landscaping when considering plans and also work with existing businesses to provide more to help balance our ecosystem from all that hot, suffocating, heat refracting building. Maybe even rooftop gardens.

Updated language
is proposed – see
the addenda and
errata
33 155. Nora Aidukas Chapter 7:

Conservation
Again, there is a reference to open space that omits those lands within the city:
"The City’s appearance is that of a community nestled within a ring of open space..." I believe that there are some 2,550 acres of protected open space that is managed by the City of Thousand Oaks, putting aside the approximately 12,700 that are managed by COSCA of the total 15,250 acres of protected open space in the city. I do not believe that it is accidental that there is a focus on the open spaces that surround the city while the open spaces within the city are left out. Please refer to my other comment about the Introduction section of the General Plan.

One of the many purposes of a general plan is to have clear communication. This is a document that will be here after many who have a part in writing it will be gone, and so it is important to be explicit as to its meaning. While it is important to have flexibility, it is destructive to have ambiguity.

Updated language
is proposed – see
the addenda and
errata
156. Ken Murray Chapter 8:

Community
Facilities and
Services
There is no mention of PUBLIC use toilet facilities. I am the former Director of Environmental Protection for Los Angeles County, and the lack of public toilets there is a SIGNIFICANT contributor to the degradation of the environment, the spread of disease, and general public DISCOMFORT.

It's unlikely that the City of Thousand Oaks will construct public toilet facilities, but the City could reach agreements with private businesses to reimburse those businesses for the costs to maintain their toilet facilities for public use.

Under the current common practices in society today, customers of most businesses are usually allowed to use private business toilet facilities. In Los Angeles though, the use of toilet facilities in private businesses is no longer a "given" due to social factors such as the rise in homelessness and drug abuse, and finding a toilet when one is urgently needed can be a challenge. This should not be. Toilet facilities are a BASIC Public Health need and are lacking in most cities today. Thankfully this is NOT the situation in Thousand Oaks currently, but this could change in the coming years.

To prepare for this possible change, the City could allocate funds for the maintenance of public toilets in a public-private partnership. A business could put a sign in clear view for the public to see stating "Public Toilet Available" and the business agrees to maintain and monitor the use of the toilet with funding from the City to help defer costs.

This is one suggestion, but whether this is implemented or not, the general plan should address the need for public restroom facilities. This is an issue in almost every city across the United States, and finding a restroom when one is needed should not be so challenging.

Respectfully,
Comment
acknowledged
157. Nora Aidukas Chapter 8:

Community
Facilities and
Services
Figure 8.3 Schools has a school identified as private, when it is a public charter school. MATES is a public school, not a private school. It is located on the corner of Erbes and La Granada. This should be corrected or clarified. There may be other errors regarding public charter schools, such as Bridges Charter School that I am not as familiar with.

Updated map is
proposed – see the
addenda and errata
158. Victor Hayek
(CVUSD)
Chapter 8:

Community
Facilities and
Services
Attached is the corrected and updated information for the schools section and CVUSD.

Schools and Higher Education
Thousand Oaks is served by the award-winning Conejo Valley Unified School District, which provides exceptional educational experiences to children in transitional kindergarten through Grade 12, Preschool and Post-Secondary. CVUSD proudly operates 27 public schools across the City and proximate unincorporated areas including 16 elementary schools, four middle schools, one K-8 school, three comprehensive high schools, a continuation high school, a hybrid learning high school, a home school program, and one adult educational learning center. Figure 8.3 shows the locations of the schools. CVUSD schools, teachers, athletic teams and extra-curricular offerings have been recognized at the state and national level for their outstanding accomplishments, including:

California Distinguished Schools and National Blue Ribbon School honors. Thousand Oaks also houses 19 private schools and three Charter Schools serving students in grades TK-12.

Consistent with national, state, and countywide trends reflecting lower birth rates and changing demographics, many schools, including CVUSD schools have seen a decline in enrollment in recent years.

To remain a top destination for education CVUSD continues to innovate and expand its academic offerings this includes the opening of the Conejo Valley’s first Spanish-English Dual Language Immersion Program in 2022, and in 2023 authorization of the first International Baccalaureate Primary Years Programme in Ventura County at Cypress Elementary School.

Schools and Education
Goal CFS-15: Diverse and affordable recreational programs and services for all Thousand Oaks residents, regardless of age, activity level, physical ability, or income.

15.1 School enrollment.

Continue to work with Conejo Valley Unified School District (CVUSD), private schools, and charter schools to monitor local K-12 enrollment and plan for impacts related to growth or decline.

15.2 School siting.

Work with CVUSD, private schools and charter schools to identify potential school site needs to meet future demand.

15.3 School closures.

Update language is
proposed – see the
addenda and errata
34 In the event of a school site closure in the community - work with the impacted school entity to plan for future land uses - prioritizing affordable housing and public recreation and parks.
159. Claudia Bill-de la Peña Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
What is the funding opportunity to implement cultural equity opportunities? Is this a City initiative? Who is accountable for these decisions? If the City can’t directly fund BAPAC, is this an intense philanthropic campaign? How are perceived misalignments from the past rectified with this new drive? Observation on page 185: The Arts & Culture Roundtable is given a lot of credit in this document. There is hope that the volunteers will work on volunteerrun events, e.g., Rotary Street Fair, Cook-Offs, European Markets. The group has no funds to implement any events or review and advise the already busy staff.

Comment
acknowledged
160. Claudia Bill-de la Peña Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
Dear City of Thousand Oaks Staff: Thank you for allowing the New West Symphony to contribute feedback on this most important element! We opted not to address each and every goal, as several goals appeared to be outdated. Please use our general feedback and additional comments as a tool to update the AC Goals, especially as they pertain to a new amphitheater/10,000+ seat venue in the City of Thousand Oaks, given that Moorpark College is in the process of constructing an amphitheater.

Additionally, we would like to emphasize that Equity, as presented in the Draft, begins with affordability. It may not be affordable for many families or seniors to pay $5 for ticketing, and now a whopping $15 for parking. For concerts where patrons pay only $10 (students, seniors, promotional tickets), theatergoers now have to pay $15 for parking. We strongly recommend for BAPAC and the Thousand Oaks City Council to revisit the parking fee by lowering it to $10 (25% increase). Additional increases can be phased in over time.

Again, you have our gratitude for drafting the City's first Arts & Culture Element! We look forward to our comments being incorporated in the final report. —New West Symphony Board Chair
Comment
acknowledged
161. Claudia Bill-de la Peña Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
Citywide Cultural Development:

To implement this agenda would require a level of expertise that perhaps wasn’t contemplated before.

1. Who would be responsible to hire the right people in place to fully implement such a plan?

2. Would the City be a presenter?

3. Is TOArts a presenter with the City?

4. Is Cultural Affairs contemplating a move to spearhead or align all programming?

5. Is that going to be clear as they seek major investment for the expansion? Comment
acknowledged
162. Claudia Bill-de la Peña Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture

1. In the Equity abstract, the New West Symphony is pleased to say that we have specific examples of us producing exactly that! Engaging with local companies and making arrangements to be, as it is listed in the document, intentional. So we are already there.

2. ARTS and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - Here, the New West Symphony can offer special performances after concert engagement.

3. We have been discussing expanding the lobby of the theater, to make it possible for the arts and performances to be expanded into the public spaces.

Such as pre-concert concerts, post-concert events for dedicated audience. Currently nothing is possible, because of fire marshal restrictions and lack of public flow flexibility. Will this be addressed by the Campus Master Plan?

4. New West Symphony suggests family programs, support in education outreach and coordination, Pops performances and headliners coordination and copresentation.

5. Identify cooperative projects, and streamline communication to a larger community. If New West Symphony is listed as such in your plans, we should also expand marketing efforts support, inclusion in marketing materials. Current ongoing email distribution is very much appreciated! Comment
acknowledged
163. Claudia Bill-de la Peña Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
Suggest changing it to: "... a critical role in elevating arts, culture, fostering community engagement and socialization, contributing to the attractiveness of the region for family life and employment, and our heritage." Comment
acknowledged
164. Claudia Bill-de la Peña Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
There is a lot of space taken by the photo and no update since 2017 Campus Master Plan was imagined. What is the current thinking about an outdoor amphitheater? What would be the location? What are other features that are maximizing the space after the pandemic? Comment
acknowledged
165. Claudia Bill-del la Peña Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
We recommend a whole page be devoted to an explanation of the role of TOArts, given how blended the operations are. We believe it will be an essential topic for this document to cover. What kind of arts funding is envisioned to support and cultivate performing arts organizations? Comment
acknowledged
35 166. Wendy Zimmerman Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
Programs at the Civic Arts Plaza are too expensive for many residents who become excluded from entertainment because it is not affordable. There should be reduced ticket price programs for any show that does not sell out, and also some seats made available (so what if they are up high) at reasonable prices like $20 or less for most. More small venues should also be encouraged and offer affordable entertainment. Movies are not the answer. Live performances are much more engaging and enriching. Such things should be available year round.

Comment
acknowledged
167. Wendy Zimmerman Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
Public entertainment, such as the summer concerts at the park, should be extended beyond just the time frame of Memorial Day to Labor Day. We have good weather, particularly in the fall that is great for outdoor activities. The June pop up series has been good, why not have another version for the fall? Or some other music and arts activities in April and Early May when the rainy season is over. We have year round weather, we should use it and not hibernate.

Comment
acknowledged
168. Claudia Bill-de la Peña Chapter 9: Arts
and Culture
Comment: Delete: "The performing arts scene is defined primarily by the" and instead say, "The City’s Civic Arts Plaza’s and BAPAC which includes the 1,800- seat Kavli Theatre, and the 394-seat Janet and Ray Scherr Forum theatre (which doubles as the Andrew P. Fox City Council Chambers and Planning Commission venue) is home to the larger proportion of ticketed performing arts events in TO.

Comment: Please add “is home to the larger proportion of ticketed performing arts events in Thousand Oaks." "There is a range of outdoor public festivals and celebrations produced each year in Thousand Oaks and there is a demonstrated need for and interest in developing a large-scale amphitheater and festival site in the City." Comment: Further explanation is required. Demonstrated how? Contemplated in the next strategic plan? Before City Council? Update language is
proposed – see the
addenda and errata
169. Janet
Miller
Wall General
comment
There doesn't seem to be a record of the comments we make. Is one available? Where can it be found? Thanks in advance. Comment acknowledged
170. Carol McNutt General
comment
I believe that it is very important to keep our ridgelines free of any kind of development. Comment acknowledged
171. Ping Fang General
comment
I'm told to fill all missing considerations under General Comment section. I'm available for further discussion.

As might be considered under Community Facility Service, a specific type of Senior Housing, called Residential Health Care Facility should be given as an option for developers to choose as an community support option for Dementia Care of Elder Seniors, as oppose to only for very low income units. Of course, developers can meet both needs at the same time, if the Council would encourage such development via regulations.

That is a growing concern among incoming "Silver Tsunami" as called-out in a recent KCLU report on the situation in Ventura County. TO will be missing out on this opportunity by leveraging the resurgence of housing or mix-use development. Let alone to say such Senior Housing option gives elder seniors more dignity living in their final years.

Comment
acknowledged
172. Ping Fang General
comment
I'm told to use General Comments for missing ideas from the draft General Plan.

Like emerging diverse programming in local performing arts, similar concepts can be applied to ethnic cuisine for the same rational in Arts & Culture. But TO needs a place like International Food Windows for people to experience it. People here is curios enough to give it a try (e.g. authentic Chinese, Thai or Indian cuisine, or even Chinese Tea House) in addition to those with immigrant background from the surrounding areas. The more authentic it is the more curios and more respect people are
Comment
acknowledged
173. Mark Sellers General
comment
On behalf of the owner of the Stonecreek office property north of Hillcrest Drive studied in the City’s recent comprehensive Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update and located in the area defined as the Moorpark Road to West Thousand Oaks Boulevard Area that is being proposed for mixed use land use changes, we have read, and being familiar with the CEQA process and having reviewed many EIRs, we find the Draft EIR on this comprehensive 2045 General Plan Update as a thorough and well done informational document and support its certification by the City Council. (removed)
Comment
acknowledged
174. Nicole Collazo, Air
Quality
Specialist,
VCAPCD
Planning
Division
General
comment
Ch. 13, Implementation. The chapter includes general timeframes (year ranges) but no additional discussions were found pertaining to how tracking of progress will be conducted and by who, monitoring, reporting, frequency, unless it was specifically cited inside the table of actions, although this did not occur in every action listed.

Comment
acknowledged
175. Josh Gray General
comment
Dear Mayor McNamee and Councilmembers,
On behalf of the 700+ members of the Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce representing over 40,000 local jobs, I urge you to approve the Thousand Oaks General Plan 2045, as presented by staff.

Our Chamber has been actively engaged in the General Plan process over the past four years, continuously providing input and feedback on behalf of the business community.

During that time, we have witnessed the high level of community engagement the city has undertaken to craft this visionary planning document for the first time in fifty years.

The General Plan Update provides a roadmap to support strategic economic development for the next two decades while carefully balancing the community needs around safety, parks/open space, conversation, arts and culture and Comment
acknowledged
36 mobility.

The Land Use Map was endorsed by the City Council in 2021 after an extensive amount of community input and thoroughly outlines how the City of Thousand Oaks intends to address the lack of housing diversity, repurpose underutilized properties, and maintain family-friendly residential neighborhoods.

This infill development approach for housing will meet the State-mandated requirements while supporting additional workforce housing, encouraging our local businesses to grow and thrive.

The Chamber applauds the efforts of the City Council, Planning Commission, General Plan Advisory Committee and city staff to prepare this impactful document and is committed to being an excellent partner as this plan becomes a reality.

Sincerely,
176. Brett Boynton General
comment
The up-zoning proposals to overbuild the remaining parcels of open space with medium to high density houses shoehorned in, for maximum builder profit are not what SB330 orders.

To satisfy the state's mandate - Please repurpose our existing commercial properties that already have a footprint with viable ingress in place.

This is how we meet the state's requirement without radically altering the zoning of our open space parcels of land, that are adjacent to established residential neighborhoods. Thank You.

Comment
acknowledged
177. Jackson Piper General
comment
To the City Council, Planning Commission, Staff, and residents of the City of Thousand Oaks, The following letter is a response to the likely adoption of the General Plan Update, requesting that the City of Thousand Oaks take further policy actions that will lead to the retention of existing affordable housing units within the City and the production of substantial amounts of new affordable housing units to meet the needs of all residents within the City. It makes use of data presented within the City’s own Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element (February 2022 Version) and the Draft General Plan known as Thousand Oaks General Plan 2045, as well as from other sources related the City’s development history. The content of the letter is divided into sections related to constraints on housing, local housing needs, and potential solutions within the City.

Constraints: Land Use and Zoning:

The greatest constraint on new affordable housing production within Thousand Oaks is both spatial and political: the amount of land that is available for development and the regulations that govern the form and types of use that can take place in the development. With Thousand Oaks unable to expand outward, land use decisions within the existing footprint of the city are critical to expanding the city’s ability to house people. Residential densities set forth in land use policies are one of the major determining factors in any city’s housing capacity, with higher density allowing more housing units within the same geographic footprint. While increasing this capacity alone will not create housing affordability, the absence of enough capacity when the need or demand for housing is high will ensure that housing costs will increase up to the point where every person unable to compete financially for increasingly scarce housing will be displaced from the community.

Currently, and this is unlikely to change, Thousand Oaks is split almost evenly between open space and all other uses. A full 47% of the land within the City’s boundaries is preserved as open space, parks, or golf courses and would require an unlikely majority vote of residents to change, leaving 53% of the City’s land for any kind of development. Of total city land, 29% (or around 55% of the non-preserved land) is residential, with the vast majority of this zoned for low density detached single family homes at a maximum density of 4.5 dwelling units per acre. Only about 2% of total city land (or under 4% of non-preserved land) contains higher density residential types such as apartments, townhomes, condominiums, and pre-SB9 duplexes (Draft General Plan p. 42). Commercial uses are 3.7% of the city’s total land (Draft General Plan p. 43) or around 7% of the non-preserved land. Per Table 4.1 in the Draft General Plan 2021-2029, out of a total of 35,486.8 acres in the City of Thousand Oaks, 10,222.1 acres are zoned for any kind of residential, 1,317.6 acres are zoned for commercial, and 9.2 acres are zoned for mixed use.

Divided a different way, moderate to high density residential housing is possible on only 709.7 acres of residential land within the City of Thousand Oaks, with the addition of 9.2 acres of Mixed Use and potentially 1,317.6 acres of commercial zoning that may be able to accommodate housing due to AB 2011, but which will likely be reduced by physical and financial constraints. This totals 2,036.5 acres for residential development that is not exclusively single-family (now including duplex under SB9). The remaining 9,512.4 acres of residential zoned land within the city is exclusively zoned for single-family homes and may accommodate an additional primary unit and accessory dwelling unit under state laws, or under favorable conditions may be split into two lots that can each accommodate one primary unit and an accessory dwelling unit, with local governments having the authority to allow more than this minimum of units on each lot.

The Key Issues & Opportunities section (Draft General Plan, p. 48) states that “… the most critical issue addressed in the General Plan is the provision of more affordable housing.” In contrast, the Development Pattern section that follows this states that “… residents are attracted to the overall low intensity of development throughout the City. Most buildings are three stories or less and this contributes to the suburban character and continued views of the mountains and ridges surrounding the City.” The three story, 35-foot height limit that will still be present in most of the City with the passage of this General Plan update, along with the 50-foot height that will be allowed in certain mixed use locations, sets a vertical constraint on potential development in the City.

The expectation of low intensity of development, set forth in the maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre and the far smaller maximum density applicable to most of the city’s land that is present in this General Plan update, also sets a constraint on the amount of housing production that can be achieved per acre of land available for residential development.

This General Plan Update proposes in its Land Use chapter (Figure 4.4 on p. 59) to change zoning along commercial corridors within the City to allow for Comment
acknowledged
37 mixed use developments containing housing at up to 30 dwelling units per acre, and to allow pockets of Neighborhood High Density Residential zoning up to 30 dwelling units per acre along parts of Los Feliz Drive, existing apartment complexes along Wilbur and Brazil Street, and otherwise in small scattered locations around the City. The remainder of the residential zoning in the city is Neighborhood Medium 1 (maximum 15 units per acre) or below, with the vast majority maintaining a maximum of 6 units per acre. Total acreages for these new land use designations are not provided in this document, making an accurate comparison difficult; however, the appearance between the land use map in the current General Plan and the proposed Land Use map is largely the same, with the exception that commercial properties along Thousand Oaks Boulevard and within the Malls and Village Centers may now be used for housing production up to 30 units per acre.

Given that the City is almost entirely built out and can no longer expand outward at low density, we should ask if it is possible that affordable housing can be developed in sufficient quantities to meet the needs of our population, now and through 2045, under the height restrictions, density restrictions, Measure E requirements, and other regulations that constrain housing development within the City. 178. Kat Selm General
comment
The actions presented in this chapter help protect the community from natural and human-induced hazards and build resilience to projected climate change risks. Disaster resilience and preparedness are increasingly prioritized locally and regionally out of necessity due to our changing climate. The City of Thousand Oaks has opportunities with its 2045 General Plan to introduce actions that serve to bolster community safety while also contributing to climate mitigation and regional ecological resilience.

1. Flood Hazards
a. We are excited to see in goal 4.1 that the City is dedicated to not increasing flood inundation potential offsite b. Goal 4.7 creates concern as it calls for removing parcels from the 100 year floodplain at a time when regions are experiencing unprecedented pulse events and urban flooding. When considering this action, include the most up to date climate change modeling and not just flood insurance rate maps. c. Encourage the use of permeable paving materials in hardscape areas; swale designs in landscape or grassy areas; and the discharge of roof drainage into pervious, greenbelt, and seepage pit areas to slow runoff, maximize infiltration, and reduce downstream impacts from development. d. Conduct a study on the implementation of a storm water runoff impact fee program in order to incentivize the construction of impervious infrastructure.

A gap exists between data entered into a FEMA risk map or a FIRM (insurance rate map) and current climate conditions. A one in 100-year deluge is now more likely to be a one in 20 year event. FEMA maps do not reflect the mapping of urban flooding, caused by short duration intense rainfall–an event that is happening with more frequency as a result of climate change. Every square foot of impervious surface generates 3 feet of runoff each year, in a system with 45 inches a year. Decreasing impervious infrastructure can reduce flood events and improve water quality–a high priority for this city as most of the census tracts in the city, including the three identified disadvantaged communities (Tracts 69, 70, and 71), scored above the 75th percentile threshold for impaired water bodies.

2. Wildfires
a. We are pleased to see in goal 5.5 that the city will take a science-based approach to fuels management b. Goal 5.11 should include best management practices for fire management/ reduction that take into account the most up to date science and ecological practices for Southern California wildfires. For example, focus on home hardening, invasive removal, ember barriers and ignition reduction in Southern California where fires are wind driven not fuels driven.

One great source of information for the most up to date science on Southern California wildfires can be found through the California Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force, a collaborative effort created by the Newsom Administration to align activities of federal, state, local, public, private, and tribal organizations to support programs and projects tailored to the risks of each region. The Southern California Regional Profile describes that human-caused ignitions, drought stress, and invasion by flammable non-native grasses have increased the severity and risk of fires in shrublands and chaparral in Southern California, and that these habitats used to burn only once every 30-130 years pre-settlement.

3. Climate Change Mitigation
a. While we are encouraged by this section, we would like to see the City take bolder action with goal 7.4 and require electrification in all new developments.

Buildings are the second largest source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the City of Thousand Oaks, and compared to transportation, a relatively accessible source of GHG’s to address. GHG’s destabilize our climate contributing to unsafe local conditions such as increased risk of wildlife and flooding, in addition, natural gas in homes is unsafe for communities in earthquake prone areas as gas pipelines can shift during seismic events causing leaks or fires.

Even without the risk of earthquakes, gas pipelines are unsafe; every four days, on average, a gas pipeline incident kills or hospitalizes someone and/or causes a fire and/or explosion. Natural gas in homes is also unsafe for indoor air quality, especially for small children as burning gas inside our homes produces toxic indoor air pollution, including: nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and ultrafine particulates.

Emergency cooling centers are becoming a best practice for helping reduce deaths, particularly of vulnerable community members such as the elderly, to the increased heat impacts caused by climate change. These cooling centers should be properly advertised, located throughout the city, and have transportation options available to and from them.

Comment
acknowledged
38 179. Jackson Piper General
comment
Constraints: Housing Element and RHNA:

The Sixth Housing Cycle within which the Housing Element related to this General Plan applies will conclude in 2029. The Seventh Housing Cycle will follow from 2029-2037, and the Eighth Housing Cycle from 2037-2045, while this General Plan will cover through 2045. The Regional Housing Needs Assessment used for the Housing Element and requiring the City of Thousand Oaks to have zoned capacity for 2,615 new residential units only applies through 2029.

There will be a need for additional future zoned capacity for both subsequent Housing Elements. Does this General Plan Update, in its Land Use chapter, provide enough realistic zoned capacity to meet the likely Regional Housing Needs Assessment requirements through 2045? Constraints: Measure E and Total Residential Unit Capacity:

Measure E, approved by voters in 1996, states that “…voter approval is required whenever any proposed amendment to the Land Use Element would cause a net increase in the acreage of land designated for “commercial”, a net increase in the maximum number of residential dwelling units permissible under the proposed residential density ranges over that shown in the Land use Element of the General Plan, or would cause a change in the use of any land designated “parks, golf course, and open space,” based on the zoning present in the General Plan as of November 5, 1996 and applicable to any Land Use Element amendments up to November 5, 2026. Exemptions are described, including one “… where the amendment is necessary to avoid, or the application of the voter approval requirement of this section would be deemed, an unconstitutional taking of property under the United States or California Constitutions, be contrary to federal laws, or the laws of this state.” Unless future state and/or federal laws directly require an increase in residential capacity to be enacted within the City or unless a majority vote of residents overrides the cap set in 1996, Measure E establishes a maximum ceiling for the amount of housing that may exist in Thousand Oaks.

In 2017, the City of Thousand Oaks conducted an analysis of where the City’s capacity for housing development stood in relation to the limits imposed by Measure E. The analysis concluded that out of a total potential of 81,124 units that could have been produced under the zoning in 1996 and under the zoning in the current General Plan without triggering the Measure E voting requirements, a total of 5,400 unproduced units existed where projects had not developed to the maximum possible density, and these could be added to the Measure E unit bank by a vote of the City Council. The Council ultimately voted to unlock 1,080 of these 5,400 units to add to the Measure E bank. The rate of housing production between 1996 and 2017 averaged around 260 units per year (see Council Endorses E Analysis by Becca Whitnall, Thousand Oaks Acorn, October 26, 2017), at which these 1,080 units would have taken slightly over four years to develop.

Currently, the remaining total residential unit capacity within the City is (81,124 – 48,503 units built as of 2017) roughly 32,000, as noted early in the General Plan Update process. Much of this unit potential is locked up within neighborhoods that developed at lower densities than the maximum permitted and which are unlikely to change, meaning that a large part of this unit potential will remain inaccessible in the future. Given that the need for affordable housing, discussed below, far exceeds either the 5,400 units (now less) in the Measure E bank as of 2017, and the total affordable unit production possible under the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (around 3,200) or State Density Bonus (around 7,680) even if all remaining 32,000 units of residential capacity in Thousand Oaks are developed, should this capacity limit that was established in 1996 remain in place? Constraints: Mobility Related to Land Use and Housing:

Land use and mobility are often separated into distinct chapters in a general plan but are inextricably linked to one another and should be thought of together. Thousand Oaks is built around a network of high-speed arterial roads that connect single-family home neighborhoods and commercial corridors, and which serve mostly as a means of moving automotive traffic that is extremely spatially inefficient in moving each person from an origin to a destination, leading to traffic congestion, and which requires land for storage at either end. Without significant enhancements in the frequency and convenience of public transportation and the safety and comfort of bicycle and walking infrastructure to make them viable alternatives, this will continue to place the expense of affording car ownership, including the purchasing and maintenance, on lower income individuals and families in order to access work and basic needs from most potential housing locations within Thousand Oaks. Seniors and people living with disabilities will also face isolation and have difficulty accessing basic services within an environment that is built around the car as the dominant mode of transportation. Ride hailing and Dial-a-Ride services will help, but do not fully provide the autonomy that is enabled by a walkable community that is well-served by public transportation. Every current and future resident of the city should also be aware that increasing the overall amount of housing in Thousand Oaks will add automotive traffic onto the road system by inducing automotive travel demand, increasing time costs for travel, increasing monetary costs for road maintenance, and consuming more scarce land for automotive storage, unless there is an accompanying effort to shift transportation to more spatially efficient modes (bicycles, buses, and walking where possible) within the city as much as is possible.

Comment
acknowledged
180. Jackson Piper General
comment
Housing Needs and Specific Constraints: Cost Burden of Housing:

Data from 2017 showed that of 46,135 households in Thousand Oaks, 16,701 households paid over 30% of their household income towards either rent or mortgage, and that 7,705 households in the city paid over 50% of their household income towards either rent or mortgage. Households with a high housing cost burden are less able to absorb unexpected expenses, and those with a severe housing cost burden of over 50% of their household income have an increased risk of falling into homelessness (Table 20, Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element). The COVID-19 pandemic and economic instability of recent years has certainly added to the economic instability faced by local residents, and put them at increased risk of housing instability since these data were collected in 2017. Even if the numbers have not changed, the reality that 36 percent of the City’s households are cost burdened, and 16.7 percent of households are severely cost burdened and at greater risk of homelessness, should be a grave concern to the City’s leadership and residents alike.

Comment
acknowledged
39 Specific constraints affecting the cost burden of housing in Thousand Oaks include the scarcity of land available for development – especially the extreme scarcity of land available for higher density development - driving up land values, the scarcity of unoccupied yet already developed housing available to meet housing needs driving up housing and rental values, and the limited new housing unit production potential created by artificially imposed density limits, height limits, parking requirements, and other regulations that increase the development cost of each new unit and/or decrease the economic viability of each new unit. Housing Needs and Specific Constraints: Specific Populations to Access Affordable Housing:

Beyond the general need for more affordable housing overall in Thousand Oaks, there are specific populations with affordable housing needs that will have to be accounted for. Table 22: Special Needs Based on Household Characteristics (2010 and 2015-2019) in the Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element shows that there was a 6.1 percent increase in the number of households with seniors aged 65+ in this period, and if this trend holds through 2028 the City will have

41.1 percent of its households with seniors aged 65+ at that time. Seniors living alone increased by 1 percent during this time to 10.7 percent of the households within the City, and if the trend holds will be 11.7 percent of the City in 2028. Senior residents are more likely to be living on fixed incomes that render them at risk of losing their housing security in the event of unexpected expenses.

Table 23: Special Needs Based on Personal Characteristics (2015-2019) in the Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element shows that as of 2019, 10.3 percent of the households within the City contained a person with a disability, and an estimated 0.9 percent, or 1,089 households, contained a person with a developmental disability that will have special housing needs that, unmet, will leave them at risk of falling into homelessness. This table also shows 5.1 percent, or 6,527 households contain residents living below the poverty line within the City, and lists 130 people as homeless within the City, although it should again be pointed out that this data is from prior to the pandemic and economic upheaval that followed.

Constraints affecting affordable housing access for these specific populations are the limited availability of housing designed to meet the needs of senior or disabled residents living on fixed incomes, and the limited availability of permanent supportive housing units for formerly-homeless individuals and families to be placed into once they are ready to leave the city’s new interim supportive housing. Producing new housing to meet the needs of the senior and disabled populations within the city will require that the city’s regulations do not make multi-story design and accessibility elements such as elevators financially infeasible to include within projects, as they often are within lower density development types. Producing new permanent supportive housing to provide long-term stability for formerly homeless individuals and families without creating a segregated district perceived as an enclave for the undesirable population in the city will require new projects being incentivized to include permanent supportive units in their mix without rendering projects too costly to build. Mobility is also likely to be a key constraint for these populations, many of whom are unlikely to have the financial resources to own and maintain a personal vehicle or may be unable to operate one safely, meaning that accessing and returning from destinations not within safe and convenient walking and wheelchair distances or accessible by public transportation will be much more difficult for them if their housing is poorly located.

Housing Needs and Specific Constraints: Economic Impacts of Housing Instability: Average rents in Thousand Oaks in 2021 ranged from $1,809 per month for a studio to $3,937 per month for a four bedroom apartment, according to data cited on page 23 of the Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element. A household paying no more than 30 percent of their monthly income towards rent would have to have a household income of around $6,000 per month to afford the studio, and $13,000 per month to afford the four bedroom apartment. Given that a studio is likely to be inhabited by one wage earner, and a four bedroom apartment is likely meant for families with two wage earners, the minimum wage necessary for the studio apartment to be a viable option would be $37.50 per hour, and the minimum wage necessary for the four bedroom apartment would be $40.63 for each earner. As there are many small businesses and even global franchises and corporations with workers earning wages substantially below these amounts in the City of Thousand Oaks, much of the City’s workforce will not be able to afford these rents and will be forced to commute in from places where they can afford to live, or to pay more of their income towards rent than 30 percent and risk housing instability in the event of unexpected expenses, or to live in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions within the city. Absent these options, many local businesses will not be able to retain workers to continue functioning.

Constraints affecting workforce affordable housing access in Thousand Oaks are spatial, such as the vast majority of residential land being dedicated to lowdensity housing types (detached single-family) that are unaffordable to much of the workforce and the limited space available for higher density development of housing options that are more spatially efficient and less costly, political, such as the pressure placed on the existing housing supply by artificial constraints such as the Measure E ceiling pushing housing costs out of reach of many wage-earners, and mobility-based, including the nearrequirement of car ownership and its associated costs existing for anyone within the city’s workforce that is fortunate enough to afford housing costs within Thousand Oaks, which may help push them into a cost-burdened or extremely cost-burdened condition that increases their housing precarity. 181. Jackson Piper General
comment
Solutions: Existing Affordable Housing in Thousand Oaks:

Thousand Oaks’ total affordable housing stock as shown on pages 31-32 of the Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element amounts to 1,142 units affordable to lower income households (within the low, very low, and extremely low-income categories). In the Fifth Housing Cycle between 2014 and 2021, the city only managed to produce a total of 33 units of housing within these categories (Table B-2: 2014-2021 Progress in Achieving Quantified Objectives). Eight mobile home parks also serve as affordable housing for low income and senior populations mostly living on fixed incomes and with the requirement that any change of use or closure of the mobile home park will require the owner to pay displaced tenants for the reasonable cost of relocation (Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element, p. 54). While the recent Quality Inn permanent supportive housing conversion and the planned interim supportive housing at the navigation center on Lawrence Drive will be great improvements, these will only provide 77 units of permanent housing for the homeless and 30 units of temporary housing for the homeless, respectively. The preservation of existing affordable housing will be critical, as the loss of any single unit sets the City back in its goal to Comment
acknowledged
40 provide affordable housing for its residents, especially when so little affordable housing exists at present within the City.

The existing supply of occupied single-family residences within the City may be able to offer some additional options for affordable housing where extra, unused rooms and/or accessory dwelling space exists. A house-sharing program where homeowners with extra living space are matched with people paying an affordable rent or people paying a further reduced rent in exchange for performing household duties, such as the HIP Housing Home Sharing Program in San Mateo County, may help both residents looking for an affordable rental and homeowners who can use assistance with household duties while aging in place. The City should look into creating a similar program locally.

Solutions: Potential Housing Production and Affordable Housing Production, Current and Proposed:

Under the city’s existing zoning, if only the Mixed Use and higher density Residential land are developed to the city’s cap of 30 dwelling units per acre, the maximum amount of housing that could be produced without any density bonus would be 718.9 acres x 30 = 21,567 units. If the 10 percent Inclusionary Housing requirement applies to all of these units, then 2,156.7 units of affordable housing would be produced. Under this scenario, each percentage point increase of the Inclusionary requirement would yield roughly an additional 215 units of affordable housing. While this would not be an unappreciable amount of new affordable housing, it would not adequately address the need present within Thousand Oaks, and the Inclusionary Housing requirement therefore sets too low of a limit to be entirely relied upon to solve the affordable housing deficit within the City.

If all current commercially zoned land in the City (1,317.6 acres) is made available to housing in addition to the above 718.9 acres, and able to produce the maximum of 30 dwelling units per acre without the state density bonus, the total amount of housing produced would be 61,095 units, and the total potential affordable unit production under the 10% Inclusionary Ordinance would be 6,109 lower income units. However, not all commercial properties within the City will be suitable to housing development, and height limits, density limits, and parking requirements for commercial and residential uses eating up much of the potential property may make it infeasible to build in many cases. Zoning changes on the Land Use Map present within this General Plan Update are also limited in scope and leave out much of the commercial land within the City. Furthermore, the total housing unit production in this scenario would exceed the maximum residential unit cap established in Measure E by 29,000 units, making this outcome extremely unlikely.

Even if every one of the City’s remaining 32,000 units of potential residential capacity is developed within qualifying projects under the proposed 10% Inclusionary Housing requirement, a maximum of 3,200 lower income affordable units would be produced. If every one of the 32,000 units were developed within qualifying projects under state density bonus law, it would produce a maximum of 7,680 lower income affordable units. Barriers to housing production due to density & height restrictions, development standards, parking requirements, and community opposition along with material and labor costs and the difficulty in piecing together funding for affordable units mean that the realistic housing production in Thousand Oaks will be far below these numbers. Means must be found to increase the pace of housing production within Thousand Oaks and to increase the overall capacity of the city to house people, with incentives to create an abundant supply of new affordable housing units. 182. Jackson Piper General
comment
Solutions: Opportunities for Additional Affordable Housing in Thousand Oaks:

The above sections explore the potential for affordable housing production within the constraints set by the City of Thousand Oaks within both its current General Plan and the proposed General Plan update that will apply through 2045. These constraints, including, but not limited to, the low residential density present throughout most of the city’s residential land, height limits of 35 feet applicable to the majority of residential land, and lack of any available option for the city to build further outward at low density and low height due to being already built out, necessitating only inward infill development, mean that Thousand Oaks is not realistically capable of meeting the affordable housing needs of much of its population. Adding affordable housing capacity that does not equal or exceed the amount of households suffering a cost burden (16,701 in 2017) or even an extreme cost burden (7,705 in 2017) will help alleviate some of the housing insecurity within the city, but will not solve it. Additional actions beyond those presented in this Draft Thousand Oaks General Plan 2045 and the related 2021-2029 Housing Element will need to be taken if the affordability issue and connected quality of life issues such as homelessness are going to be effectively addressed.

Potential opportunities for the City to act to address these issues include further upzoning within the City, such as upzoning to allow an increase in density above the 30 dwelling units per acre maximum allowed in mixed use and high density neighborhood residential zones, missing middle upzoning to allow an increase in density at a smaller scale across a much broader amount of land within the City that is present within the City’s detached single-family neighborhoods, allowing additional height to accommodate new housing production that would not otherwise be feasible, exempting affordable units or projects with a certain percentage of affordable units from Measure E requirements, the purchase and provision of additional land by the City to use for affordable housing development funded in part or whole by Federal and State programs such as the Low Income Housing Tax Credit, reduction in parking requirements where access to good bicycle, walking, and public transportation infrastructure exists, advocating for a County-level tax increase that could fund the partial or full subsidy of affordable housing units for those whose incomes don’t meet the cost of living within the City, and the creation of overlay zones that would tweak the Land Use Map present in this Draft General Plan to provide more flexibility for affordable housing that meets specific needs within the City. Most of these steps would require a vote of the residents of Thousand Oaks in favor of the change under Measure E, which is why the City’s leadership and staff should continue create analyses based on the newest available data on housing that can help the public understand the affordable housing needs present here and what will need to be done to meet those needs, and should then be prepared to place proposed changes on the ballot for residents to vote on. It will be further incumbent upon the residents of Thousand Oaks to recognize the need for affordable housing within the City and the detrimental effects upon the City, and their own lives, of not meeting the needs that exist for affordable housing, and to vote in favor of changes that will Comment
acknowledged
41 address the deficit of affordable housing within Thousand Oaks.

Conclusion:

The Thousand Oaks 2021-2045 General Plan, 2021-2029 Housing Element, and Inclusionary Housing Ordinance are important steps forward and ones which must be taken; however they will not go anywhere near far enough to meet the existing and future needs for affordable housing within the City. Further action must be undertaken, by this government and future governments, to substantially narrow the gap between the supply of affordable housing and the need for affordable housing within the City. Failing to do so will result in, among other things, increased housing precarity and homelessness – especially among those with special housing needs and limited financial resources – within the City, a decrease in the workforce that can afford living within the City, and a decrease in the stability of the local economy and in local quality of life. In adopting this General Plan Update, please consider it to be not an end product but the beginning of a long process to create a housing abundance within the City that will eventually meet the housing needs of every current and future resident.

Thank you,
183. Joe Silvia General
comment
Been trying to get my street paved properly for nearly 20 years. Instead the city encourages housing density changes which foster parking and vehicle overcrowding which nullify the already insufficient street maintenance practices.

Completely disagree with the direction of this program.

Comment
acknowledged
184. Karen Marti General
comment
We just experienced a fatality in my neighborhood. I have been trying to get some traffic control on Lynn for almost two decades. It has continued to get worse with a plethora of excuses from the police department and the city council. Hopefully now since there has been a death, we can have some patrol. I do not know how that happens since the recent budget did not give our officers an increase which is essentially defunding them with inflation and you refuse to put a license plate reader by the hospital which infuses criminals into our neighborhood, but something needs to be done. The noise is just a symptom of a broken system.

Comment
acknowledged
185. Rob Marcarelli General
comment
I’m asking that changes in zoning from residential to commercial be forever outlawed.

Without this action our communities face the prospect of being overrun by out of state corporations that are actively attempting to change Thousand Oaks forever.

Most of us don’t want our city to transform into Sherman Oaks.

Comment
acknowledged
186. Sohum Gokhale General
comment
I have been a resident of Thousand Oaks for nearly 4 years now. I have observed that much of our city is either explicitly or implicitly designed to make our residents depend upon owning (and paying for) an automobile in order to live their lives.

As a simple example, the location of the Thousand Oaks Transit Center. While it is nice to look at, it's located half a mile south of a 4 lane freeway and a mile south of the next major road. There is nothing else around it except for a giant parking lot and a few mansions. Where are people supposed to go once they get off the bus? A giant parking lot? Walk for miles to their home? The implication is that one should drive and park their car there. Or be dropped off by someone with a car. Or take the infrequent bus service to another parking lot somewhere. This leads to inevitable inequities for anyone unable to drive, either due to age, disability, or income. Transit needs to go where people want to go in order to be effective. Nice buildings in the middle of nowhere are an afterthought to get "those" people away from everyone else.

I support "mixed-use" (also known as normal) development to allow our future families to lead happy, thriving lives. I appreciate and acknowledge and thank the planners for prioritizing this throughout the Land Use section of the plan. However, this MUST be accompanied by an integrated mobility plan.

Once the denser development is built and occupied - will those persons still need giant parking lots surrounding their homes just to park their cars? Won't that further alienate the people who do not want to or cannot drive? Will the rest of the city also need giant parking lots to hold the cars of those people? If so, what's the point?
All in all I'm glad to see that there is mention of addressing most of the urban design problems which subtly plague not just Thousand Oaks, but all of suburban America. As our population continues to grow we must adapt and develop smartly in order to remain competitive against other regions. If we continue to be slaves to property values, automobiles, arterial roads, and highways, our great city will inevitably be facing a steep economic decline 27 years from now.

Comment
acknowledged
187. Susan King General
comment
While I appreciate that the General Plan outlined all those years ago should be reviewed occasionally, I am NOT in favor of increasing density or expanding any boundaries originally designed to spare and protect open space. I have lived here since 1979 and watched the city grow - beautifully, I might add - but part of that beauty is the preservation of all that was originally planned. Those who crafted that document used wisdom and thoughtful consideration and frankly, some things never really go out of style! I have admired the commitment to a quality community by those who serve the city and the residents and wish it to remain so. Thank you for all that you all do in those interests.

Comment
acknowledged
188. Wendy Zimmerman General
comment
TO erroneously focuses on the 101 corridor that is already congested and will become even more crowded, polluted, and distressed instead of spreading out growth and infill throughout the entire City. It is not fair to put so much of the burden on residents who live near the 101. City should look to work on areas including out by CLU, the shopping centers further off the 101 freeway such as those that are closer to the 23 freeway and beyond. City needs to take a much more holistic view of all portions of the City and spread out the growth burdens and make sure that affordable housing is included throughout the City and public transit is provided to meet the needs of more people and enable us to reduce our reliance on cars. State of CA has reduced parking requirements, but we will continue to have and to need more cars because we do not have adequate alternative transportation.

Comment
acknowledged
42 189. Dennis Barnikel General
comment
I wasn't able to review the General Plan in it's entirety which is great to look at but the main problem here is that you will do everything to meet the wishes of Sacramento and not the residents who live here. There are communities in California who arelegally fighting Sacramento from building higher with more low income housing. Please stop the continual erosion of our way of life to make us more like the San Fernando Valley. The roadways in T.O. have not been built to sustain the increasesin population.

Comment
acknowledged
190. Angela Huffine General
comment
I am a concerned citizen who has spent a considerable amount of time reviewing the General Plan Proposal 2045. I have reviewed in detail each and every topic presented and I sincerely hope that the following comments, which are also reflective of dozens of Thousand Oaks residents, will be taken into serious consideration for review and not disregarded and ignored. Thank you.

Comment
acknowledged
191. Nora Aidukas General
comment
The Engagement Summary is not searchable and I didn't find my comments that I have made in earlier stages of this process. If you're going to ask for comment, you ought to have those comments recorded. I have kept the emails that I submitted properly in the little box back in June, but I don't see them in the Engagement Summary. What should I do to have them included? Last, I'm sure the folks who wanted to be kept in the loop don't appreciate their emails being made public. You might want to redact them.

This change has
been made
192. Ping Fang General
comment
I'm told by Matt (Consultant) to put missing ideas under General Comment section. I'm available for further discussion.

Among all Mobility options, there was no consideration given for eVTOL (electric vertical take off and landing) option. This option is very important for economic development AND transportation needs. It deserves short term discussion because of opportunistic timing It is anticipated 1st launch of commercial services in the US around 2025 (so all players are looking for service points). TO has unique propositions to support a regular services as a site for Vertiport (as a passenger take-off and landing site) at the Transportation Center, which can be separated from a maintenance site at a regular county airport (e.g. Camarillo Airport) Updated language
is proposed – see
addenda and errata
193. James Friedl (CRPD) Land Use/Parks
and Open
Space
District staff have evaluated the future residential growth component as proposed in the City of Thousand Oaks's 2045 DRAFT General Plan related to the current and future planned park sites.
• Residential units within Village Centers could be reasonably absorbed by current parklands and future park dedication/impact fees of the developments. • Due to the larger land area and current deficit in parkland within the proposed "Areas of Change", the population from the proposed additional residential densities as well as existing residents would most likely be underserved by existing parklands. • With the population growth, the Mixed-Use areas will need additional public parkland to meet the needs of the future residents at the community's current service level. It would be most feasible to add additional parkland in the Rancho Conejo, Oaks/Janss mall, and other major Mixed-Use areas because there are larger parcels and fewer owners.
• For maximum flexibility, public parks should be allowable under all Land Use designations and zoning categories.

Comment
acknowledged
194. James Friedl (CRPD) Land Use/Parks
and Open
Space
Beyond the General Plan alternatives for updating the General Plan Land Use Map, the District proposes several recommendations to City General Plan, Zoning or development policies in order to help all residents - current and future - to enjoy a park within a 10-minute walk of their home and in a parks/population ratio comparable to the existing condition:
• Formulate policy accompanying the general plan update to:

O Incentivize developer dedication of parkland (along with park construction and landscape maintenance districts if feasible) by providing a "density bonus" to waive/adjust units per acres, building heights, and/or parking requirements; O Provide increased residential density into Areas of Change that have a greater number of larger parcels (4+acres) which may be available for public parkland via sale, dedication, public-private partnership; O Provide increased residential density in areas with surplus parkland and limit residential density in areas without adequate parkland. • At the initial "pre-screen” intake of development projects, city staff to work with the District to explore and encourage the possibility of property owners to dedicate parkland, construct public park facilities and establish landscape maintenance districts as part of the de/elopment proposal. • Reevaluate and modernize park dedication fees and park impact fee schedules to meet future parkland needs due to the increased residential density and population.

Comment
acknowledged
195. Richard Francis Land Use/Parks
and Open
Space
The SOAR organization is interested in whether cities in Ventura County have incorporated the 2016 SOAR initiatives into their General Plans. In Thousand Oaks the 2016 SOAR initiative, Measure W, extended the SOAR law, the Parks Iniative and City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) to the year 2050. Could you please confirm whether the Thousand Oaks General Plan Update incorporates the CURB line and Existing Parks, Gold Courses and Open Space designations as depicted in Measure W, and if the General Plan includes text referenecing the 2050 extension? Updated language
and map is
proposed – see
addenda and errata
196. Jack Bernard Chapter 10:

Safety
Thank you for prioritizing emissions reductions and green energy in our city. It is drastically needed. I want to encourage the city to add an additional policy or edit existing policy in the general plan to not only reduce emissions and transition to green energy, but to also reduce energy CONSUMPTION as a whole wherever possible in the city. Green energy will do nothing for our environment and planet if energy consumption levels remain where they are or continue to grow. Ultimately, the city is taking many steps to already do this in other sections of the general plan (alternative forms of transportation, water usage, etc) but I would like to see language from the city in this section showing its dedication to reducing energy consumption as a whole city wide through policy, education, and infrastructure. We need to be serious about this.

Comment
acknowledged
197. Conejo
Climate
Chapter 10:

Safety
The actions presented in this chapter help protect the community from natural and human-induced hazards and build resilience to projected climate change risks. Disaster resilience and preparedness are increasingly prioritized locally and regionally out of necessity due to our changing climate. The City of Comment
acknowledged
43 Coalition;
Ventura
Climate
Coalition;
Citizens'
Climate Lobby,
Ventura
County;
CFROG;
Chalice
Climate Action
Team; CCCJN;
Ventura
County YIMBY;
Community
Environmental
Council
Thousand Oaks has opportunities with its 2045 General Plan to introduce actions that serve to bolster community safety while also contributing to climate mitigation and regional ecological resilience.

1.Flood Hazards
a. We are excited to see in goal 4.1 that the City is dedicated to not increasing flood inundation potential offsite b. Goal 4.7 creates concern as it calls for removing parcels from the 100 year floodplain at a time when regions are experiencing unprecedented pulse events and urban flooding. When considering this action, include the most up to date climate change modeling and not just flood insurance rate maps. c. Encourage the use of permeable paving materials in hardscape areas; swale designs in landscape or grassy areas; and the discharge of roof drainage into pervious, greenbelt, and seepage pit areas to slow runoff, maximize infiltration, and reduce downstream impacts from development. d. Conduct a study on the implementation of a storm water runoff impact fee program in order to incentivize the construction of pervious infrastructure.

3. Climate Change Mitigation
a. While we are encouraged by this section, we would like to see the City take bolder action with goal 7.4 and require electrification in all new developments.

4. Climate Resilience
a. Incorporate into the Heat Response goal 6.7 the identification and implementation of emergency cooling centers, such as libraries, senior centers, parks and recreation sites, with ample public transportation, to shelter groups of people during extreme heat periods. Emergency cooling centers are becoming a best practice for helping reduce deaths, particularly of vulnerable community members such as the elderly, to the increased heat impacts caused by climate change. These cooling centers should be properly advertised, located throughout the city, and have transportation options available to and from them. 198. Nora Aidukas Chapter 10:

Safety
Is it possible to adopt "cool pavements" with high albedo surfaces that reflect more light in street resurfacing? Could a program to explore the feasibility of this be included in the General Plan now? Here is a link to the subject: https://news.mit.edu/2021/countering-climate-change-cool-pavements0822#:~:text=Due%20to%20what's%20called%20the,emitting%20that%20radiation%20as%20heat.

Comment
acknowledged
199. Angela Huffine Chapter 10:

Safety
Allowing weeds to grow out of control (due to thankfully recent rainfall) does not lend itself to fire control, conserving water and eliminating fire hazards should be one of the city’s top priorities for residents; not putting another traffic light in the entrance of freeways; a waste of the city’s resources of our tax money. And how does placing transients in local hotels lend itself to citizen’s safety; not to mention another waste of taxpayers money and expense when they are offered all this for free?? What are the planners going to do with the information they gleaned on page 211 of the proposed Plan? What is their obligation to turn it in for review and inspection to determine if any developments aren’t to code and going to be non-beneficial/ dangerous to do so? What set backs? Notice of geologic hazards, and do exactly what with all this information? No explanation presented at all. Who is responsible for reviewing these studies and what is their responsibility to follow up on tasks and recommendations? How does the public know that they aren’t just passed over? Soil hazards – who is overlooking all of this? “New essential facilities in flood zone”- What “essential facilities”? And why would we ever build these, whatever they are, in a flood zone??!! Flood Hazard Reports – what are these people’s limitations? Community Forest – expand and maintain community forest to Comment
acknowledged
44 sequester carbon dioxide (THIS IS WHERE THE MAIN FOCUS SHOULD BE)! How can we sequester carbon dioxide when all the plan points to is cutting down trees to replace it with concrete?
200. Rob de Geus Chapter 10:

Safety
The emergency evacuation section of the General Plan states, “Results of the analysis show that even with Thousand Oaks’ broad transportation system, an evacuation event could still result in significant congestion, resulting in delayed evacuation for residents.” The General Plan refers to Appendix B for more information regarding this determination and defers more detailed evacuation analysis through Implementation Action S-A.7., which calls for evaluating “evacuation route capacity, safety, and viability under a range of emergency scenarios as part of the next update to the Hazard Mitigation Plan.” The emergency evacuation analysis provided in Appendix B is largely qualitative. While population assumptions are used to generate predicted roadway volumes, there is no analysis of the time required for evacuation or how evacuation times would change as a result of the new development anticipated under the General Plan. The City is concerned about evacuation impacts from new development since any easterly evacuation of Thousand Oaks would significantly impact Westlake Village and its ability to evacuate in a safe and orderly fashion. In addition to the 101 Ventura Freeway, most of the City’s major and secondary arterial streets connect to Thousand Oaks. As also noted in the City’s comment letter on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, a comprehensive quantitative evacuation analysis should be conducted to determine how evacuation times and routes may be impacted by new development and how that impact would affect Westlake Village. Such analysis should consider both daytime evacuations when additional non-residential development may impact evacuation times, as well as nighttime evacuations when additional residential development may impact evacuation times.

A revised Safety
Element is
proposed – see
attachment 5
201. Janet
Miller
Wall Chapter 11:

Noise
Forward thinking communities are addressing the impacts of gas powered blowers and they aren't even mentioned in the update. Gas powered blowers are extremely noisy and are used throughout the neighborhoods daily. In addition to the noise, they create air quality issues for those walking by them. Please correct this and address how the City is willing to help those with gardening businesses replace their toxic equipment with better models.

Comment
acknowledged
202. Karen Martin Chapter 11:

Noise
It still amazing to me that you can do a sound study at a hospital, in a residential area, with a place of worship next door for enlargement of a helipad and not include an C weighted study for the vibrational effects to the area, but you did.

Now you tell us there are sound sensitive areas such as hospitals, residential and places of worship that need to be taken into account. Why would I believe you are taking CEQA into account when you haven’t for any of the recent projects: Rubber Duck, Lupe’s, or K-Mart. No traffic mitigation was needed either.

Seriously? Can you really tell me with a straight face that there is less traffic? That we are safer? The realization that Thousand Oaks as I knew it is gone. It has been replaced by a developer driven city council. I am not against progress, but I am against exploitation of our wonderful town for the benefit of a few.

Do a REAL sound study and let’s address reality.

Comment
acknowledged
203. Karen Martin Chapter 11:

Noise
Your plan to mitigate noise is to decrease the backup alarms of equipment to ambient noise levels? Do you see the idiocy of this statement? Alarms are meant to be annoying to avoid accidents. If they are not louder than ambient noise levels, they blend in and serve no purpose.

Comment
acknowledged
204. Jon Stoeckly Chapter 11:

Noise
Promote a pattern of land uses that is compatible with current and future noise levels- 1.3 - Mixed use developments.

This policy requires design and construction of mixed-use developments to achieve noise levels in the conditionally acceptable range or lower per Table 11.2 for outdoor recreation areas associated with residential components and to achieve interior noise levels in residences of 45 CNEL or lower, consistent with Title 24 interior noise standards. We are concerned that this goal would be difficult to achieve in mixed use development locations including The Oaks as the City designated mixed use areas are generally in high dBA locations that are either conditionally acceptable or unacceptable (see map on p. 226 and mixed use noise designation on p. 229).

Since the City is choosing to locate new multifamily residential including affordable housing in these areas, we suggest making achievement of the specified noise levels a goal rather than a requirement and acknowledging that it may not be feasible to implement while maintaining affordability of housing. As stated previously, this issue should be dealt with in the General Plan EIR and not as a General Plan requirement. If retained as a requirement, it also conflicts with applicable statutory requirements for development of housing as mentioned in our previous comments on LU-3 and LU-4. (Chapter 11, Noise P. 228) Comment
acknowledged
205. Jon Stoeckly Chapter 11:

Noise
Minimize adverse noise impacts associated with transportation, 2.2 Sensitive receptors and roadway noise.

This goal requires noise minimization techniques including building configuration and design, sound walls, traffic calming, traffic diversion, or rubberized asphalt. These requirements could be difficult and expensive to implement for mixed use residential development, which is largely slated to be developed along major roadways, the 101 Freeway, and higher traffic areas, and would be cost prohibitive for low income housing. If retained as a requirement, it conflicts with applicable statutory requirements for development of housing as mentioned in our previous comments on LU-3 and LU-4.

As stated previously, this issue should be dealt with in the General Plan EIR and not as a General Plan requirement. Therefore, we respectfully request that these be suggestions rather than requirements. (Chapter 11, Noise P. 230) Comment
acknowledged
206. Angela Huffine Chapter 11:

Noise
Where’s the studies on increased pollution all along local highways and how that will be addressed on a consistent and ongoing basis? Noise complaint response – too vague- should be dealt with warning, and second warning should be heavy fine/ eviction.T.O. does not dominate views in the city and that’s the way we want to keep it. But already you can see a BIG CITY as you exit off the TO ramps and it’s disagreed that natural landforms should be classified for development. Already buildings are being built way over the heights originally determined and can easily be seen from both outside and inside the city circle.

There is no reasoning this plan presents to justify the allowance of more development. Those apartments you built at the old Mexican restaurant (give address) are so conspicuous and the trees you placed there ardly cover these buildings- built literally right up to the street (TO BLVD)!! WATER RESOURCESNow there’s a topic to talk about! AIR QUALITY – How do you expect to maintain water supply (which is already low) and air quality when you bring in more and more people?! And while the state mandates all sorts of ridiculous demands on small towns they SHOULD BE ADDRESSING toxic air contaminants, air Comment
acknowledged
45 quality and water sources in this state.Community Services- libraries- both T.O. and Newbury Park libraries have vagrants presence which turns away taxpayers from utilizing these facilities.Public Schools- Vagrants practically living in library areas where students wish to use for studying and tutoring. Rather than banning these individuals from these facilities, the city turns a blind eye and permits then to wander about practically living in these facilities, using the restrooms, etc.Why is public school enrollment down? Two Reasons. Rather than promote birth control rates (and eradicating Planned Parenthood vipers in this neighborhood) as well as monitor school lesson plans, birth control is promoted and non essential , non academic, offensive school material is taught to the detriment of the students. In desperation, parents are turning to private schools to provide appropriate education for their children, while funding via taxes the depravity of subjects taught in the public schools. These are the reasons why public school enrollment is down, not because there aren’t enough people in this town. Emergency Response – more and more controlled fires should be performed and desalination modes should be top priority in this city.

What is your “water shortage contingency plan” because frankly T.O. residents are so heavily restricted from using water at the expense of huge water bills? And correctly, land development in Thousand Oaks has most certainly disallowed filtration of water yet that is exactly where the city concentrates – on more concrete and asphalt put into place, which then prevents this filitration. Ludicrous. All the while bringing into this town more and more people.ConservationYES!! and less people so we can CONSERVE everything!! And of course- repurpose school grounds for what? More housing! What?? Why expand Los Robles Hospital and CLU? They already occupy huge parcels of land! 207. Nora Aidukas Chapter 12:

Governance
Are there structural practices that contribute to Thousand Oaks having the city manager and city attorney among the highest paid in the region? What is the long-term cost of having such highly compensated public employees in the city? Where are these issues even addressed in this document? Comment
acknowledged
208. Angela Huffine Chapter 12:

Governance
We should be invited to come speak personally with members of city council including Al Adams to express our voice regarding how our tax money is spent, especially now that it has gotten so out of control. This “inclusion” does not exist; whatever is spoken or written by citizens is taken at arm’s length and then disposed of at the city’s whim. This is why you will begin (and already started to) lose your tax base of individuals. The Housing Element is completely an example of this. Providing adequate housing for all income levels “has been none other than the FIRST and FOREMOST priority of city council.” REALLY? What about tax payer’s FIRST priorities? Does that even matter or count? No regard to the community voice, desires, etc. As indicated in many previous correspondence letters to the council. Not everyone CAN LIVE HERE, or anywhere where it’s not affordable, and that’s ok! Nor is it fair to those town dwellers to have to abide by such reckless dcisions to have to make everyone able to afford that which they cannot. In fact, it’s unfair and misleading to all sides, sooner or later. An affluent community will overwhelm those who never could afford to live in such communities to begin with; not to mention that it brings in elements of individuals that have no business living in certain areas due to their financial and economical status. This is sheer common sense; broken and misused. In summary, as the City Manager has the responsibility to oversee and administer the day to day operations as well head up this city and the Planning Commission, who reviews and decides on applications for commercial, residential, industrial, and other development projects; reviews development proposals and general plan and makes recommendations to the City Council on matters related to the City’s General Plan, zoning ordinance, and other City planning policies and regulations. This appeal is particularly to those bodys of city goverance. The City of Thousand Oaks boasts of having a robust community engagement ; the sincere hope here is that the aforementioned comments never fall on deaf ears or get pushed aside in favor of corporate and deep pocket self satisfying interests. Public Involvement is indeed strong in Thousand Oaks in all areas of topics discussed in this General Planning presentation; and indeed in budgeting because when it comes right down to it, all too often government, local and state, expenditures are made o Comment
acknowledged
209. Jon Stoeckly Chapter 13:

Implementation
LU-A.2-Create new mixed use zoning district.

It is unclear from this goal if it applies to all mixed use designated areas, would be limited to an area such as Thousand Oaks Blvd., or whether the draft General Plan Update’s specific requirements for specific areas such as The Oaks would be excluded. This item also appears to be limited to infill development. We respectfully request that the applicability be clarified and, given the diverse areas potentially covered by the mixed use designation, that The Oaks be excluded from the requirement for performance standards and other matters that would conflict with commercial regional uses at The Oaks. (Chapter 13, Implementation P. 245)
Comment
acknowledged
210. Jon Stoeckly Chapter 13:

Implementation
LU-A.7-Specific or Master Plan for The Oaks.

The City intends to coordinate with property owners of key opportunity sites to develop a specific or master plan. It is unclear what is meant by “key opportunity sites”, who would be consulted, who would be excluded from consideration, how the City would resolve potentially conflicting development goals by property owners. Imposition of a specific plan or master plan requirement would slow and inhibit development of housing and further commercial development at The Oaks. As noted in our previous comments on LU-15 The Oaks - 15.1, imposing a specific or master plan on The Oaks conflicts with applicable statutes. We respectfully request that the City delete this requirement.

Comment
acknowledged
211. Nicole Collazo, Air
Quality
Specialist,
VCAPCD
Planning
Division
Chapter 13:

Implementation

Page 252 ends

City which include recommendations that may not necessarily be found in the AQAG, last amended in 2003.

Updated language
is proposed -see
addenda and errata
212. Nora Aidukas Chapter 14:

Glossary
There are two terms that are not defined in the glossary that caught my eye: barren and science-backed. Barren is a word that is used to describe vegetation in the open space section, and if it is used as a term of art adopted by the state or some other agency, it should be defined in the glossary. Otherwise, it Comment
acknowledged
46 should be omitted.

Additionally, there is a reference to there being "science-backed" programs regarding fire safety. What does this mean? The reader is left to guess which programs are "science-backed"? For example, there has been a public push to do more brush clearance to 200 feet from homes, even though there is no evidence that 200 feet is twice as safe as 100 foot clearance. Is that what science-backed means? If not, what? These terms do not need to be in the glossary if there are corrections made in the Open Space and Safety sections of the plan. Please clarify, regardless. cdd:440-20/H:COMMON/Planning Commission/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-11-13/2045 Gen Plan Update/07B Gen Plan Update 2019-70760-GPA Attach 2/pz (FILE ID:2019-70760-GPA, 2022-70558-EIR, 2018-70723-HSG) STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor September 8, 2023
Kelvin Parker, Director
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Dear Kelvin Parker:

RE: City of Thousand Oaks’ 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Draft Housing Element Thank you for submitting the City of Thousand Oaks’ (City) draft housing element that was received for review on July 12, 2023. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (b), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review.

The revised draft housing element meets most of the statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law ( Gov. Code, § 65580 et seq). However, the element cannot be found in full compliance until the City has completed necessary rezones to address the shortfall of sites to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) pursuant to Assembly Bill 1398 (Chapter 358, Statutes of 2021) as described below.

Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1398 (Chapter 358, Statutes of 2021), a jurisdiction that failed to adopt a compliant housing element within one year from the statutory deadline cannot be found in compliance until rezones to accommodate a shortfall of sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583, subdivision (c), paragraph (1), subparagraph (A) and Government Code section 65583.2, subdivision (c) are completed. As this year has passed and Program 1 (Adequate Sites for RHNA and Monitoring of No Net Loss) and Program 2 (By-Right Approval of Projects with 20 percent has not been completed; the housing element is out of compliance and will remain out of compliance until the rezoning have been completed.

For your information, as the housing element relies upon nonvacant sites to accommodate more than 50 percent of the RHNA for lower-income households, the housing element must demonstrate that the existing use is not an impediment to additional residential development in the planning period (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (g)(2).). Absent findings (e.g., adoption resolution) based on substantial evidence that the existing use is likely to be discontinued during the planning period, the existing uses will be presumed to impede additional residential development and will not be utilized toward demonstrating adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA. The City must make these findings as part of its adoption resolution.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
ATTACHMENT #3
(To 11/13/2023 PC Report)
Kelvin Parker, Community Development Director

Page 2 ends

Public participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element process, the City must continue to engage the community, including organizations that represent lower-income and special needs households, by making information regularly available while considering and incorporating comments where appropriate. Please be aware, any draft revisions to the element must be posted on the local government’s website and to email a link to all individuals and organizations that have previously requested notices relating to the local government’s housing element at least seven days before submitting to HCD.

Please note, upon adoption of the housing element, the City must submit an electronic version of the sites inventory with its adopted housing element to [email protected]. Pursuant to Government Code section 65583.3, subdivision (b), the City must utilize standards, forms, and definitions adopted by HCD when preparing the electronic sites inventory. See HCD’s housing element webpage at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-community-development/housing-elements for a copy of the form and instructions. The City can reach out to HCD at [email protected] for technical assistance.

Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant, Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program, and HCD’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City now meets housing element requirements for these and other funding sources.

HCD appreciates the hard work, cooperation and responsiveness the City’s housing element team provided throughout the housing element review and update and looks forward to receiving the City’s adopted housing element. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance please contact Shawn Danino, of our staff, at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Melinda Coy
Proactive Housing Accountability Chief
cdd:440-20/H:COMMON/pPlanning Commission/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-11-13/2045 Gen Plan Update/07B Gen Plan Update 2019-70760-GPA Attach 3/pz (FILE ID:2019-70760-GPA, 2022-70558-EIR, 2018-70723-HSG) 2021-2029
Housing Element
Adopted January 2022
Revised January 2023
Revised July 2023
ThousandOaks
AATTACHMENT #4
(To 11/13/2023 PC Report)
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 I. Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 11 II. Public Participation ............................................................................................................................ 11 III. Consistency with Other Elements of the General Plan ............................................................... 33 Needs Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 7 I. Population Trends and Characteristics ........................................................................................... 77 II. Employment Trends .......................................................................................................................... 99 III. Household Characteristics ............................................................................................................1010 IV. Housing Inventory and Market Characteristics .........................................................................1414 V. Housing Needs ...............................................................................................................................2020 VI. Publicly Assisted Housing .........................................................................................................333233 VII. Future Growth Needs ...................................................................................................................3837 Resources ............................................................................................................................ 4039 I. Regional Growth Needs – 2021-2029.........................................................................................4039 II. Financial and Administrative Resources .....................................................................................4140 Housing Constraints ........................................................................................................... 4746 I. Governmental Constraints ............................................................................................................4746 II. Environmental and Infrastructure Constraints .........................................................................7574 III. Economic Factors ..........................................................................................................................7877 Housing Plan ....................................................................................................................... 8381 I. Housing Goals ................................................................................................................................8381 II. Housing Programs .........................................................................................................................8381 Appendix A: Public Participation .......................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Evaluation of the 2014-2021 Housing Element ................................................ B-1 Appendix C: Sites Inventory .................................................................................................. C-1 Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing ........................................................... D-1 City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 i
List of Tables
Table 1: Population Trends (1990-2021)........................................................................................................ 7 Table 2: Age Distribution (2010 and 2015-2019).......................................................................................... 8 Table 3: Racial and Ethnic Composition (2015-2019) ................................................................................. 9 Table 4: Employment by Industry1 (2015-2019)......................................................................................... 10 Table 5: Total Households (2010 and 2015-2019)...................................................................................... 10 Table 6: Household Type Characteristics (2010 and 2015-2019)............................................................. 11 Table 7: Occupied Units by Tenure (2000, 2010 and 2015-2019)............................................................ 12 Table 8: Household Income by Tenure (2015-2019) ................................................................................. 12 Table 9: Median Household Income (2000, 2010, and 2015-2019)......................................................... 13 Table 10: Distribution by Income Group (2005-2009 and 2014-2018) ................................................. 14 Table 11: Housing Unit Growth .................................................................................................................... 14 Table 12: Housing Inventory by Unit Type (2010-2021) .......................................................................... 15 Table 13: Unit Type by Tenure (2015-2019) ............................................................................................... 15 Table 14: Unit Size by Tenure (2015-2019) ................................................................................................. 15 Table 15: Occupancy Status (2000, 2010 and 2015-2019)......................................................................... 16 Table 16: Age of Housing Stock (2015-2019) ............................................................................................. 17 Table 17: Units Lacking Plumbing or Complete Kitchens (2015-2019) ................................................. 17 Table 18: Median Rent by Unit Size (2021) ................................................................................................. 19 Table 19: Income Categories and Affordable Housing Costs -Ventura County ...............................2120 Table 20: Housing Assistance Needs of Lower Income Households (2013-2017)...........................2322 Table 21: Overcrowding by Tenure (2015-2019)....................................................................................2423 Table 22: Special Needs Based on Household Characteristics (2010 and 2015-2019) .....................2423 Table 23: Special Needs Based on Personal Characteristics (2015-2019)...........................................2524 Table 24: Disability Characteristics (2019) ...............................................................................................2625 Table 25: Estimated Housing Needs for Special Needs Populations ..................................................3130 Table 26: Publicly Assisted Housing Affordable Units ..........................................................................3534 Table 27: Thousand Oak’s Share of Regional Housing Needs .............................................................3938 Table 28: RHNA Allocation (2021-2029) ................................................................................................4039 Table 29: Land Inventory Summary to Meet RHNA ............................................................................4140 Table 30: Existing General Plan Residential Land Use Designations .................................................4847 Table 31: General Plan 2045 Draft Land Use Designations ................................................................. 4948 Table 32: Residential Development Standards by Zoning District ......................................................5150 Table 33: Residential Parking Requirements ...........................................................................................5352 Table 34: Permitted Residential Uses (Residential Zoning Districts) ..................................................5453 Table 35: Permitted Residential Uses (Non-residential Zoning Districts) ..........................................5554 Table 36: Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan Area - Zoning .....................................................6261 Table 37: Thousand Oaks Planning & Environmental Fees ................................................................. 6765 Table 38: Typical Permit Processing Fees per Unit for Various Housing Types ..............................6766 Table 39: Total Processing and Development Impact Fees for Typical Residential Developments .........................................................................................................................................................................6967 Table 40: Review Authority and Timeframe for Permits and Entitlements .......................................7069 Table 41: Mortgage Application Approval Rates (2017) .......................................................................8078 Table 42: 2021-2029 Quantified Objectives ..........................................................................................10698 Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation ............................................................... B-3 Table B- 2: 2014-2021 Progress in Achieving Quantified Objectives ................................................. B-10 Table C- 1: Land Inventory Summary to Meet RHNA ........................................................................... C-1 City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 ii
Table C- 2: ADU Permits Issued 2018-2020............................................................................................. C-2 Table C- 3 : Summary of Pipeline and Credit Units ................................................................................. C-3 Table C- 4: Pipeline and Pending Projects ................................................................................................. C-3 Table C- 5 : Remaining Approvals and Expected Timing for Credit Units ....................................... C-54 Table C- 6: Land Inventory Summary to Meet RHNA ......................................................................... C-77 Table C- 7: Acreage of Rezoned Sites ......................................................................................................... C-7 Table C- 8: Mixed-Use Sites Summary ................................................................................................. C-1211 Table C- 9: Mixed-Use Sites ................................................................................................................... C-1514 Table C- 10: The Mall Sites – Parcels by Existing Use ...................................................................... C-3741 Table C- 11: Mall Sites ............................................................................................................................. C-3842 Table C- 12: Neighborhood Sites .......................................................................................................... C-4044 Table C- 13: Neighborhood Sites .......................................................................................................... C-4145 Table C- 14: Examples of Redevelopment Project ............................................................................ C-4448 Table C- 15: Recent Redevelopment Projects in the Region ............................................................ C-4549 Table C- 16: Small Sites (<0.5 acres) by Common Ownership ........................................................ C-5853 Table C- 17: Redevelopment Projects with Lot Consolidation ........................................................ C-6156 Table C- 18: Affordability Assumptions by Density .......................................................................... C-6459 Table D-1: Racial Composition in Neighboring Cities and County D-7 Table D-2: Dissimilarity Indices for Ventura County (1990-2020)....................................................... D-8 Table D-3: Dissimilarity Indices City of Thousand Oaks (1990-2020).............................................. D-11 Table D-4: RHNA Unit Distribution by % Minority Concentration ................................................. D-13 Table D-5: RHNA Site Inventory Unit Distribution by % Population with Disabilities ................ D-15 Table D-6: RHNA Site Inventory Unit Distribution by Percent of Children in Married-Couple Households .................................................................................................................................................. D-20 Table D-7: RHNA Unit Distribution by Percent of Children in Single Female-Headed Households ........................................................................................................................................................................ D-20 Table D-8: RHNA Unit Distribution by LMI Population ................................................................... D-22 Table D-9: Domains and List of Indicators for Opportunity Maps ................................................... D-27 Table D-10: RHNA Unit Distribution by TCAC Opportunity Area ................................................. D-29 Table D-11: Opportunity Indices by Race/Ethnicity- Ventura County and City of Thousand Oaks ........................................................................................................................................................................ D-31 Table D-12: RHNA Unit Distribution by CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score .............................................. D-43 Table D-13: Housing Problems and Cost Burden- Ventura County .................................................. D-44 Table D-14: Housing Problems, Elderly and Large Households, Ventura County ......................... D-45 Table D-15: Housing Problems and Cost Burden- City of Thousand Oaks ..................................... D-46 Table D-16: Housing Problems, Elderly and Large Households, City of Thousand Oaks ............ D-49 Table D-17: RHNA Unit Distribution by Cost-Burdened Homeowner Households ..................... D-50 Table D-18: RHNA Unit Distribution by Cost-Burdened Renter Households ............................... D-50 Table D-19: Overcrowded Households- Ventura County ................................................................... D-51 Table D-20: RHNA Unit Distribution by Overcrowded Households ............................................... D-53 Table D- 21: 2019 Calls to Ventura County 2-1-1 ................................................................................. D-58 Table D-22: Loan Applications and Approvals by Race (2018) .......................................................... D-61 Table D- 23: Conejo Recreation and Parks District (CRPD) Parks Projects .................................... D-72 City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 iii
List of Figures
Figure 1: Population Growth Forecast (2020-2045) - City of Thousand Oaks ....................................... 8 Figure 2: Median Home Prices (2020-2021)................................................................................................ 18 Figure C- 1: Sites Inventory Map - Overview .......................................................................................... C-8 Figure C- 2: Areas of Change and Village Centers ................................................................................... C-9 Figure C- 3: Mixed-Use Sites by Consolidated ID Overview .......................................................... C-1312 Figure C- 4: Mixed-Use Sites by Consolidated ID- Detailed Aerial View ...................................... C-2228 Figure C- 5: Mall Sites Parcels ............................................................................................................... C-3943 Figure C- 6: Neighborhood Sites ........................................................................................................... C-4044 Figure C- 7: Site C and Site J Parcels with Common Ownership .................................................... C-6055 Figure D-1: Housing Rights Center Complaint Process Flowchart ...................................................... D-2 Figure D-2: Weekly Online Workshops Offered by the Housing Rights Center (2021) .................. D-5 Figure D-3: Minority Concentration by Block Group- Ventura County ............................................. D-9 Figure D-4: Racial and Ethnic Majorities by Census Tract- Ventura County ..................................... D-9 Figure D-5: Race/Ethnicity Composition Changes (2010-2019)........................................................ D-10 Figure D-6: Racial and Ethnic Majorities by Census Tract- City of Thousand Oaks ...................... D-11 Figure D-7: RHNA Unit Distribution by Minority Concentration - City of Thousand Oaks ....... D-12 Figure D-8: Population with Disabilities- Region .................................................................................. D-14 Figure D-9: RHNA Unit Distribution by Concentration of Persons with Disability ...................... D-15 Figure D-10: Children in Married Households- Region ....................................................................... D-17 Figure D-11: Children in Single Female-Headed Households- Region ............................................. D-17 Figure D-12: Children in Married-Couple Households- City of Thousand Oaks ............................ D-18 Figure D-13: Children in Single Female-Headed Households- City of Thousand Oaks ................ D-18 Figure D-14: Low and Moderate Income Population – Ventura Region .......................................... D-21 Figure D-15: Low and Moderate Income Population- City of Thousand Oaks ............................... D-22 Figure D-16: Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs)- Region .......... D-23 Figure D-17: Median Income – Region ................................................................................................... D-25 Figure D-18: Median Income – City of Thousand Oaks ...................................................................... D-26 Figure D-19: TCAC Composite Scores- Region .................................................................................... D-28 Figure D-20: TCAC Opportunity Areas- City of Thousand Oaks ..................................................... D-29 Figure D-21: TCAC Education Scores- Region ..................................................................................... D-32 Figure D-22: Great Schools Ratings ........................................................................................................ D-33 Figure D-23: TCAC Education Score- Thousand Oaks ....................................................................... D-35 Figure D-24: AllTransit Score- City of Thousand Oaks ....................................................................... D-37 Figure D-25: Transit Stops within ½ Mile – City of Thousand Oaks ................................................ D-37 Figure D-26: Jobs Proximity Index- Region ........................................................................................... D-38 Figure D-27: TCAC Economic Score- Region ...................................................................................... D-39 Figure D-28: Jobs Proximity Index – City of Thousand Oaks ............................................................ D-40 Figure D-29: TCAC Economic Score- City of Thousand Oaks ......................................................... D-40 Figure D-30: TCAC Environmental Score- Region .............................................................................. D-41 Figure D-31: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores- City of Thousand Oaks ................................................... D-42 Figure D-32: Cost Burdened Owners (2019) – Region ........................................................................ D-44 Figure D-33: Cost Burdened Renters (2019)- Region ........................................................................... D-45 Figure D-34: Cost Burdened Owners (2014)- Thousand Oaks ........................................................... D-47 Figure D-35: Cost Burdened Owners (2019)- Thousand Oaks ........................................................... D-47 City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 iv
Figure D-36: Cost Burdened Renters (2014)- Thousand Oaks ........................................................... D-48 Figure D-37: Cost Burdened Renters (2019)- Thousand Oaks ........................................................... D-49 Figure D-38: Overcrowded Households – Ventura County ................................................................ D-51 Figure D-39: Overcrowded Households- City of Thousand Oaks ..................................................... D-52 Figure D-40: Median Year Structure Built – City of Thousand Oaks ................................................ D-54 Figure D-41: Sensitive Communities- Region ........................................................................................ D-55 Figure D-42: Sensitive Communities- City of Thousand Oaks ........................................................... D-56 Figure D- 43: Homeless PIT Counts by City- Ventura County .......................................................... D-57 Figure D-44: HCV Concentration- City of Thousand Oaks ................................................................ D-62 Figure D-45: Median Gross Rent/ Affordability Index – Thousand Oaks ....................................... D-63 Figure D-46: Public Housing Buildings- Thousand Oaks .................................................................... D-64 Figure D-47: Social Vulnerability Index – Thousand Oaks ................................................................. D-65 Figure D- 48: Access to Transit ................................................................................................................ D-69 Figure D- 49: Thousand Oaks Transit Routes ....................................................................................... D-69 Figure D- 50: Access to Grocery Stores .................................................................................................. D-70 City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Thousand Oaks has been and continues to be a proponent of housing for persons of all income levels and special needs. This Housing Element Update identifies new strategies for expanding housing opportunities during the 2021-2029 planning period. Major components of the Housing Element include:
• A review of progress made under the previous Housing Element (2014-2021):
o Permits for 697 new housing units were issued from 2013-2020. Of these, 33 permits were issued to build affordable housing units.
o 90 existing housing units were conserved as affordable housing. • An assessment of existing and projected housing needs for the 2021-2029 projection period (June 30, 2021 - October 15, 2029), including the City’s share of the regional need for housing as mandated by State law. The City’s share of the regional need for this eight-year time frame is 2,621 units.
• An analysis of constraints to housing development.
• A detailed inventory of land where new housing can be built, including vacant residential and underutilized residential sites.
• Continued support for the development of affordable housing, including financial support to affordable housing providers with use of the City’s Housing Trust Funds. • Continuation of housing programs relative to fair housing and housing for persons with special needs.

The City of Thousand Oaks is in the process of updating its General Plan. This Housing Element identifies opportunities for new housing based on the PreferredEndorsed Land Use Map. Public participation will continue as the City moves toward completion of the General Plan update through 2023.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 1
Introduction
I. OVERVIEW
State law requires the preparation of a Housing Element as part of a jurisdiction's General Plan (Government Code §65302(c)). Each Housing Element must be updated periodically and is subject to review and certification by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. This update addresses housing needs from October 15, 2021 through October 15, 2029 as required by State law.

As specified in Government Code Section §65583, all Housing Elements must contain the following:
• A review of progress made under the previous Housing Element • An assessment of existing and projected housing need
• A detailed inventory of sites where new housing can be built • An analysis of constraints to the development of new housing • Opportunities for energy conservation for residential development • An analysis of existing assisted housing that could change from low income to market rate housing during the next 10 years
• An assessment of fair housing conditions
• Housing goals, objectives, and policies relative to the preservation and development of housing
• Programs for implementing the housing goals, objectives, and policies II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Public participation is an important component of the planning process in Thousand Oaks. This update to the Housing Element has provided City residents and other interested parties with numerous opportunities for review and comment.

1. Preparation of Housing Element
The City of Thousand Oaks is in the process of a comprehensive update to the General Plan. Outreach for the Housing Element update, which has been fast-tracked to meet mandatory deadline, was conducted in conjunction with outreach for the General Plan 2045 update. Outreach was conducted in three phases and began in April 2019. The phases are listed below and a comprehensive list of outreach activities is included in Appendix A.
• Phase 1: Existing Conditions (April 2019 to December 2019) • Phase 2: Listening & Visioning (September 2019 to December 2019) • Phase 3: Policy Development & Plan Alternatives (December 2019 to Present) City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 2
A variety of community engagement activities for the General Plan update were held, including:
• Public Workshops: The format and activities of each workshop reflected a specific topic and phase in the General Plan Update process and provided opportunities for residents and stakeholders to come together and provide feedback.
• Community Forums: Forums provided an opportunity to delve deeper into key topics and share insights on the latest land use, circulation, development changes, and market trends affecting Thousand Oaks and the region.
• Stakeholder Meetings: The consultant team met with smaller targeted groups and individuals of the Thousand Oaks community to hear feedback on specific topics, including housing. • General Plan Advisory Committee Meetings: A diverse 24-member committee was formed and composed of residents, business owners, educators, students, and other members of the Thousand Oaks community who met and collaborated to provide insight throughout the City’s General Plan update process. These meetings were open to the public to observe, comment, and participate in activities. The December 10, 2019 meeting was a dedicated discussion on housing.
• Public Meetings: City Council and Planning Commission held a variety of study sessions throughout the General Plan update process to receive project updates and discuss a variety of topics. The February 11, 2020 City Council meeting was specifically dedicated to a discussion on housing.
• Virtual Office Hours: The project team held a series of open question and answer sessions on various aspects of the process.
• Online Surveys: Online surveys were conducted throughout the General Plan update process to solicit feedback on the vision of the City, issues facing the City, identifying where future growth and development should be, and the land use alternatives.

The City also maintains a website dedicated to the General Plan update that includes all meeting materials and summaries for each of the community engagement activities at https://www.toaks2045.org/communityengagement.

Key comments received include:
• Challenges/threats:
o Quality of life: Accommodating new development without impacting the quality of life; Lack of community facilities
o Housing: High cost of housing; Homelessness; Lack of housing diversity; Unable to attract employees to live in the City
o Equitable Community: Housing for all income levels; Better access to quality healthcare; Improved infrastructure in older neighborhoods; Better transportation opportunities to access social services; Access to parks and open spaces o Diverse economy: Need higher paying jobs; Need diversity of jobs; Tax revenue not diverse
o Retail: Changing nature of retail; Too much retail; Lots of underutilized or vacant commercial spaces
o City Government: Concern about maintaining high level of public services; increased accessibility
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 3
o Demographics: Aging population
• Opportunities:
o Housing: Build a diversity of housing types; Build more housing for all income levels, especially lower and middle income
o Growth and development: Protect character of single-family neighborhoods; Protect low-scale character of the community; Revitalize Thousand Oaks Boulevard with mixed-use; Revitalize the shopping centers with walkable, mixed-use “village centers”; Create a downtown for the City
o Quality of life: Attract more families with young children; Construct more community gathering places; Expand services for seniors, youth, and persons with disabilities; Expand arts and cultural activities
These comments were considered during preparation of the Draft Housing Element. For example, the City’s strategy to meet the RHNA needs included the redevelopment of sites along Thousand Oaks Boulevard with mixed-use and mixed-income developments.

Public comments were solicited on the Draft Housing Element update. Notices were circulated to individuals and organizations representing the interests of lower income and special needs households and all property owners of sites identified on the sites inventory. Comments from the general public were solicited on the City’s website at www.toaks.org. The draft document was made available on September 22, 2021 for review at the General Plan 2045 website. The public also provided feedback at the Planning Commission meeting on the Draft Housing Element update on September 27, 2021 and online through the City’s website.

Public comments received on the Draft Housing Element (released for public review on September 22) and at the Planning Commission meeting (September 27) were incorporated into the draft where appropriate. These comments included:
• Strengthening the actions to promote/incentivize affordable housing development • Additional discussion on farmworker estimates and household income distribution • Clarifying language on methodology of site selection
• No more delays on Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and Linkage Fee Update: Moved up timelines for the Inclusionary Housing and Linkage Fee and added concrete actions and goals • City should not promote gas rebates in its energy conservation efforts • Updating flooding section to include Newberry Park in floodplain areas Other questions/comments not addressed in this draft but discussed at the meeting included:
• SB 9 and SB 10: City determined it is premature to address in the Housing Element. • Objective Design Standards (SB 330): Objective design standards will be adopted as a separate item from the Housing Element with Program 5 establishing a timeline by the end of 2022. • On Energy Efficiently: The City should require all electric appliance buildings and adopt the state’s 2022 building energy efficiency standards (Title 24). A policy requiring all electric requires more comprehensive discussion and assessment on potential costs on housing development. This policy discussion cannot be resolved in the Housing Element. The City will adopt the 2022 standards after the state’s adoption of those standards.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 4

2. Adoption of 6th Cycle Housing Element
The draft 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element reviewed by Planning Commission on September 27, 2021 with the community feedback incorporated was submitted to the State Department of Housing and Development on October 27, 2021. On December 3, 2021, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) completed review of the draft Housing Element and concluded that the draft element addressed many statutory requirements; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law. On January 10, 2022 the Planning Commission reviewed and made a recommendation to approve the Housing Element to City Council. The City Council adopted the 2021-2029 Housing Element on January 25, 2022. With the HCD comments addressed, the Housing Element was submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for Certification on February 7, 2022.

3. Revised Adopted Housing Element
On April 7, 2022, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) completed review of the City Council adopted Housing Element, and provided a letter indicating that the adopted Housing Element met most statutory requirements; however, additional revisions were necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law. The revised Housing Element was made available public review for a period of seven days from January 24, 2023 to January 31, 2023, prior to resubmittal to HCD. During the public review period of the 6th cycle housing element, the City received and accepted comments from a coalition of community and housing activists. Comments received from stakeholders are documented in Appendix A and are summarized below with responses.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 5
Comment Response
The City should generally make stronger
commitments and some specific actions should
have a sooner timeline.

Reducing processing time for development
permitting will almost certainly require the City
of Thousand Oaks to hire more staff to process
the permits
The City made good faith efforts to address housing
needs and concerns considering staffing and funding.

As specified by the comments regarding reducing
processing items, the City considered the best use of its resources.

The Housing Element does not address the
increased rents at mobile home parks in the City.

The City Mobile Home Rent Stabilization Ordinance
regulates rents to protect residents.

Concern that ADU development costs lead to
them mostly being rented out at market rates.

Are SCAG affordability projections for ADUs
consistent Thousand Oaks trends?
The City does not have data on affordability of ADUs
permitted. However, the City has included objectives
to develop incentives and tools to facilitate ADU
construction and feasibility of providing enhanced
incentives in exchange for affordability covenants by
June 2024 as well as informing ADU landlords of
source of income protection laws.

How will the RHNA goals in future Housing
Elements will also be met under the current
EndorsedPreferred Land Use Map given that it
is very likely that similar or even more
demanding goals will be made in future Regional
Housing Needs Assessments
Housing Element must be updated periodically by law.

The City will re-evaluate its housing needs and the
appropriateness of its Land Uses in the next planning
cycle
Short-term rentals may be limiting housing
supply.

The City has not received many inquiries or complaints
regarding short term rentals. The City did not identify short-term rentals as a constraint.

Would the city also be willing to waive/eliminate
fee payments for projects that are 100%
affordable housing?
Due to limited resources, the City does not typically
offer fee waivers; however, the City Council may
approve a waiver, offer deferred or reduced fees, or
supplement fees for affordable housing projects. The
City will consider fee deferrals for projects with a
minimum of 20 percent affordable units in the lower
income categories.

Can data be updated using 2020 Census results? 2020 Census data was not available at the time when the draft was created. Updating the data would incur
greater time and resources.

Village Centers comprised of residential above
retail in the limited footprint of existing
shopping centers alone may not function as well
as hoped
Village Centers were identified during the outreach
process. The City will continue to review the
effectiveness of these strategies on upcoming Housing
Element Updates.

Can the Annual Performance Review (APR) of
the Housing Element be included as part of a
Staff Report to City Council in order to engage
the public more effectively in future
The APR is already part of a Staff report when it is
presented to City Council.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 6
III. CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE

GENERAL PLAN
State law requires that all portions of the General Plan be internally consistent. The Housing Element is closely related to development policies contained in the Land Use Element, which establishes the type, intensity and distribution of land uses throughout the City. The Land Use Element determines the number and type of housing units that can be constructed in the various land use categories. Areas designated for commercial and industrial uses create employment opportunities, which in turn create demand for housing. This Draft Housing Element was prepared in conjunction with the General Plan 2045 update and considered the Preferred Land Use Map endorsed by City Council on May 25, 2021.

As the General Plan or individual elements are updated in the future, the City will review and revise the Housing Element as necessary to ensure internal consistency.

The City provides water services to its residents. Consistent with SB 1087, the City will include a policy in the General Plan Conservation Element to prioritize water services for affordable housing development applications. The City will also send a copy of the adopted Housing Element to its sewer service providers.
conversations about what is working and what
needs improvement?
Can Housing that is offered at any affordability
level below market rate be exempted from being
counted as a Measure E unit allocation?
No, Measure E is based on overall residential capacity, which does not include an exemption for affordable
residential units. As part of the General Plan Update,
the Endorsedpreferred Land Use Map redistributes
Measure E residential capacity into new mixed-use
areas that will not require allocation for residential
development.

The City did not explore generating higherdensity development through decreased unit sizes, rather than through expanded height
limits.

Higher density was discussed in general, but ultimately not included as part of the land use direction received by City Council. The City’s regulations do not
preclude the ability to develop small units. State
Density Bonus Law allows for increases in density and
waivers or reduction of development standards.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 7
Needs Assessment
This chapter analyzes demographic and housing characteristics that influence the demand for and availability of housing. The analyses form a foundation for establishing programs and policies that seek to address identified housing needs.

I. POPULATION TRENDS AND CHARACTERISTICS
Housing needs are influenced by population and employment trends. This section provides a summary of the changes to the population size, age, and racial/ethnic composition of the City of Thousand Oaks. The data for this analysis was compiled primarily from the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census, the 2015-2019 American Community Survey (ACS), 2021 California Department of Finance (DOF), and estimates supplemented by City and regional studies.

4. Historical, Existing, and Forecast Growth
In the two decades following its incorporation, Thousand Oaks’ population grew rapidly. During the 1965-1975 decade, the City population more than doubled. The population increased from 19,300 persons in 1965 to 53,754 persons in 1975 and averaged a yearly growth rate of 11.8 percent. In the decade 1975-1985, the City continued its rapid growth rate. By January 1, 1985, the total City population count was 94,160 persons. After 1985, however, the City’s growth rate decreased from its rapid pace of the previous decades. The California Department of Finance (DOF) estimates that the population of Thousand Oaks as of January 1, 2021 was 125,426, representing a 7.2-percent increase since 2000, approximately a 0.34 percent increase per year. The recent population growth rate in Thousand Oaks is less than that for Ventura County (Table 1Table 1). The City’s population decreased by approximately 1,200 people between 2010 and 2021, whereas Ventura County’s population increased by 1.45%.

Table 1: Population Trends (1990-2021)
County 1990 2000 2010 2021 % Change
1990-2000 2000-2010 2010-2021
Thousand Oaks 104,352 117,005 126,683 125,426 +12.1% +8.3% -0.99% Ventura County 669,016 753,197 823,318 835,223 +12.6% +9.3% +1.45% Sources: U.S. Census, 1990-2010; State Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates, 2021 The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) prepared the following projections when developing the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) goals. As indicated in Figure 1Figure 1 SCAG forecasts an increase in the population growth over the next 25 years with an estimated Thousand Oaks population of approximately 144,713 in 2045. Over the next 25 years, Thousand Oaks is forecasted to gain 13,611 new residents, representing 0.456 percent of the regional population growth.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 8
Figure 1: Population Growth Forecast (2020-2045) - City of Thousand Oaks Sources: SCAG 2020-2045 Regional Growth Forecast

5. Age Composition
Table 2Table 2 provides a comparison of Thousand Oaks and Ventura County’s population by age group in 2010 and 2015-2019. This table shows that the City’s population is significantly older than Ventura County as a whole, with a median age of about 41.5, in 2010, and 44.20 in 2015-2019, as compared to the County median of 36.2 years, in 2010, and 38.10 in 2015-2019. The City’s population between the ages of 65-74 is the fastest growing age group, having increased by 36 percent from 2010 to 2015-2019 (9,971 persons to 13,564 persons). Adults between the ages of 25 and 44 have been declining in number, with the population of this group decreasing by ten percent from 2010 to 2015- 2019 (29,853 persons to 26,907 persons). This decline is accompanied by a similar decline in children, reflecting a community that is not attracting young families to move in.

Table 2: Age Distribution (2010 and 2015-2019)
Age Group
Thousand Oaks Ventura County
2010 2015-2019 Percent
Change 2010 2015-2019 Percent Change
Under 18 30,076 27,579 -8.3% 211,915 196,787 -7.1%
18-24 10,226 10,915 6.7% 81,371 80,330 -1.3%
25-44 29,853 26,907 -9.9% 216,543 217,956 0.7%
45-64 37,964 38,187 0.6% 217,180 224,562 3.4%
65-74 9,971 13,564 36.0% 51,396 73,778 43.5%
75-84 5,686 7,339 29.1% 30,870 36,653 18.7%
85+ 2,907 3,382 16.3% 14,043 17,197 22.5%
Total Population 126,683 127,873 0.9% 823,318 847,263 2.9% Median Age 41.5 44.2 6.5% 36.2 38.10 6.5%
Source: U.S. Census, 2010 (Table QT-P1) ACS, 2015-2019 (Table B01001, B01002) 120,000
125,000
130,000
135,000
140,000
145,000
150,000
2020 2030 2035 2045
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 9

6. Race and Ethnicity
The racial and ethnic composition of Thousand Oaks differs from the County in that a lower proportion of City residents are Hispanic/Latino. In both 2010 and 2015-2019, the proportion of Hispanics and Latinos in Thousand Oaks and the County remained the same, with the County surpassing Thousand Oaks by about 20 percent. The 2015-2019 ACS shows that approximately 67 percent of City residents are non-Hispanic white, higher than that of the County as a whole (45 percent). Asians, with about 10 percent of the City’s population and seven percent of the County’s population, represent the largest non-Hispanic minority group (Table 3Table 3).

Table 3: Racial and Ethnic Composition (2015-2019)
Ethnic Group City of Thousand Oaks Ventura County
2006-2010 2015-2019 2006-2010 2015-2019
# % # % # % # %
Not Hispanic or Latino
White 88,958 71.4% 85,376 66.8% 405,113 50.1% 384,818 45.4% Black/
African American 1,076 0.9% 1,615 1.3% 13,043 1.6% 14,297 1.7% Am. Ind./Alaska
Native 208 0.2% 226 0.2% 1,952 0.2% 2,017 0.2%
Asian 11,189 9.0% 12,310 9.6% 54,081 6.7% 60,710 7.2%
Native Hawaiian/
Pacific Islander 159 0.1% 99 0.1% 1,303 0.2% 1,421 0.2% Other races or 2+
races 2,557 2.1% 3,457 2.7% 17,984 2.2% 22,399 2.6%
Hispanic or Latino
(any race) 20,524 16.5% 24,790 19.4% 315,604 39.0% 361,601 42.7% Total Population 124,671 100.0% 127,873 100.0% 809,080 100.0% 847,263 100.0% Source: ACS, 2006-2010, 2015-2019 (Table B03002).

II. EMPLOYMENT TRENDS
Housing needs are influenced by employment trends. Significant employment opportunities within the City can lead to growth in demand for housing in proximity to jobs. The quality and/or pay of available employment can determine the need for various housing types and prices.

According to California Employment Development Department (EDD) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS), the unemployment rate in Thousand Oaks in May 2021 was 4.9 percent, lower than the County and State’s unemployment rates of 5.8 percent and 7.9 percent, respectively. Table 4Table 4 shows the labor force distribution by industry between 2015 and 2019. The top industries with the largest number of employed Thousand Oaks residents were Educational, Health and Social Services (20.2 percent) and Professional, Scientific, Management, Administrative, and Waste Management Services (16.0 percent), followed by Arts, Entertainment, Recreation, Accommodation and Food Services (11.5 percent), and Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, and Rental and Leasing (10.3 percent).

Other industries generally represented similar shares of employed residents.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 10
Table 4: Employment by Industry1 (2015-2019)
Industry Employees Percent
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, and Mining 289 0.5% Construction 2,442 3.8%
Manufacturing 6,510 10.2%
Wholesale Trade 1,911 3.0%
Retail Trade 5,901 9.3%
Transportation and Warehousing, and Utilities 1,140 1.8% Information 2,682 4.2%
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, and Rental and Leasing 6,556 10.3% Professional, Scientific, Management, Administrative, and Waste Management Services 10,187 16.0% Educational, Health and Social Services 12,816 20.2%
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation, Accommodation and Food Services 7,341 11.5% Other Services (except Public Administration) 3,456 5.4% Public Administration 2,333 3.7%
Total 63,564 100%
Note: Data indicates the occupations held by Thousand Oaks residents; the location of the related workplace is not indicated by this data.

Source: ACS, 2015-2019 (Table C24050)
III. HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
This section describes Thousand Oaks household characteristics. The Census Bureau defines a household as all persons living in a single housing unit, whether or not they are related. One person living alone is considered a household, as is a group of unrelated people living in a single housing unit.

1.Household Formation and Composition
The ACS reported 45,712 households in Thousand Oaks between 2015 and 2019, an approximate 0.2 percent decrease since the 2010 Census (45,825 households) (Table 5). The rate of household growth in Thousand Oaks was slower than the growth rate countywide (1.5 percent) and statewide (3.7 percent) since 2010.

Table 5: Total Households (2010 and 2015-2019)
Jurisdiction 2010 2015-2019 Percent Change
2010-2019
City of Thousand Oaks 45,825 45,712 -0.2%
Ventura County 266,920 271,040 1.5%
California 12,577,498 13,044,266 3.7%
Source: U.S. Census, 2010 (Table DP-1); ACS, 2015-2019 (Table B11001) City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 11
The City of Thousand Oaks had 45,712 households as reported in the 2015-2019 ACS. 1 Table 6Table
6 provides historical data of households by type for the City. Family households in 2015-2019 comprised approximately 70 percent of all households in the City a slight decrease from 2010 (approximately 73 percent). The percentage of family households without children in the City increased slightly from 54 percent in 2010 to 60 percent in 2015-2019. Single-person households still make up the majority of non-family households in the city (81 percent) in 2015-2019 as in 2010 (78 percent). The average household size in Thousand Oaks was 2.75 persons per household in 2015- 2019, similar to 2010.

Table 6: Household Type Characteristics (2010 and 2015-2019) Households
2010 2015-2019
Number Percent Number Percent
Family Households 33,391 72.9% 32,031 70.1%
Without Children Under 18 18,089 54.2% 19,376 60.5%
With Children Under 18 15,302 45.8% 12,655 39.5%
Non-Family Households 12,434 27.1% 13,681 29.9%
Householder Living Alone 9,717 78.1% 11,054 80.8%
Other 2,717 21.9% 2,627 19.2%
Total Households 45,825 100.0% 45,712 100.0%
Household Size 2.73 2.75
Source: U.S. Census, 2010 (Table DP-1); ACS, 2015-2019 (Table B11001, B11003)

2. Tenure
Tenure preferences are primarily related to household income, composition, and age of the householder. Table 7Table 7 provides a comparison of the number of owner-occupied and renteroccupied units in the City as compared to the County and State as a whole in 2000, 2010 and 2015- 2019. It reveals a higher level of homeownership in the City, approximately seven percent higher than the County from 2000-2019. The homeownership rate for Thousand Oaks and Ventura County declined approximately five percent since 2000, whereas the homeownership rate statewide declined only about two percent.
1 American Community Survey (ACS) is a sample of the community and extrapolated to represent the entire community. Sample errors alone could explain the slight reduction in households. The Census Bureau recommends using ACS data as reference and interpretation should focus on relative proportions than absolute numbers.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 12
Table 7: Occupied Units by Tenure (2000, 2010 and 2015-2019) Owner-Occupied Housing Renter-Occupied Housing Total
Number % Number %
2000
Thousand Oaks 31,491 75.3% 10,302 24.7% 41,793
Ventura County 164,380 67.6% 78,854 32.4% 243,234
California 6,546,334 56.9% 4,956,536 43.1% 11,502,870
2010
Thousand Oaks 33,501 73.1% 12,335 26.9% 45,836
Ventura County 174,168 65.3% 92,752 34.7% 266,920
California 7,035,371 55.9% 5,542,127 44.1% 12,577,498
2015-2019
Thousand Oaks 32,041 70.1% 13,671 29.9% 45,712
Ventura County 171,174 63.2% 99,866 36.8% 271,040
California 7,154,580 54.8% 5,889,686 45.2% 13,044,266
Source: U.S. Census 2000 and 2010 (Table QT-H1); ACS 2015-2019 (B25014)

3. Household Income
As indicated in Table 9, according to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey (ACS), the median household income for the City of Thousand Oaks was $109,378. In 2015-2019, about 14 percent of the households earned less than $35,000 and over half of the City’s households earned more than $100,000 (Table 8Table 8).

Table 8: Household Income by Tenure (2015-2019)
Owner-Households Renter-Households Total
Number % Number % Number %
Less than $10,000 625 2.0% 700 5.1% 1,325 2.9%
$10,000 to $14,999 356 1.1% 730 5.3% 1,086 2.4%
$15,000 to $24,999 940 2.9% 864 6.3% 1,804 3.9%
$25,000 to $34,999 1,354 4.2% 973 7.1% 2,327 5.1%
$35,000 to $49,999 1,843 5.8% 1,386 10.1% 3,229 7.1%
$50,000 to $74,999 2,770 8.6% 2,278 16.7% 5,048 11.0%
$75,000 to $99,999 3,579 11.2% 2,162 15.8% 5,741 12.6%
$100,000 to $149,000 6,576 20.5% 2,343 17.1% 8,919 19.5% $150,000 or more 13,998 43.7% 2,235 16.3% 16,233 35.5%
Total 32,041 100.0% 13,671 100.0% 45,712 100.0%
Source: ACS, 2015-2019 (Table B25118)
Table 9Table 9 shows median household income in the City, Ventura County, and State of California in 2000, 2010 and 2015-2019. The City’s median income in 2015-2019 ($109,378) was substantially higher than the median income reported in Ventura County ($88,131) and statewide ($75,235), which has been the case in 2010 and 2000.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 13
According to 2000 and 2010 Census data and the 2015-2019 ACS data, in absolute terms, the median income in the City has increased substantially since 2000 (42.4 percent); however, as shown in Table 9Table 9, income growth in Thousand Oaks trailed income growth in Ventura County (47.7 percent) and California (58.4 percent). The differences in income growth can be attributed to the City’s relatively high median income as a starting point for the observed income growth.

Table 9: Median Household Income (2000, 2010, and 2015-2019) Jurisdiction 2000 2010 2015-2019 % Change
2000-2019
City of Thousand Oaks $76,815 $98,715 $109,378 42.4%
Ventura County $59,666 $75,348 $88,131 47.7%
State of California $47,493 $60,883 $75,235 58.4%
Sources: Bureau of the Census, 2010 (Table P053); ACS, 2010 and 2015-2019 (Table B19013) For the purposes of the Housing Element, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has established five income groups based on Area Median Income (AMI):2 § Extremely Low Income: up to 30 percent of AMI
§ Very Low Income: 31-50 percent of AMI
§ Low Income: 51-80 percent of AMI
§ Moderate Income: 81- 120 percent AMI
§ Above Moderate Income: >120 percent AMI
Pursuant to state and federal regulations, the Area Median Income refers to the median income for the Metropolitan Statistical Area. For the City of Thousand Oaks, this area refers to Ventura County.

County Median Income as published by HCD must be used to establish income groups for the purpose of the Housing Element. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), in projecting the region’s housing needs, provides information on income distribution by jurisdiction based on 2014-2018 ACS data. As shown in Table 10Table 10, compared to the County, Thousand Oaks has a smaller proportion of lower income households and a larger proportion of above moderate income households.
2 State income definitions are different than federal income definitions. For federal housing programs, eligibility is established for households with incomes up to only 80 percent of the AMI. These households, under the federal definition, are considered moderate income. For housing plans that are required by federal regulations, such as the Consolidated Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, the federal income definitions are used. The CHAS data presented later, adheres to the federal income definitions.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 14
Table 10: Distribution by Income Group (2005-2009 and 2014-2018) Jurisdiction Total
Households
Very Low
Income
(31-50%)
Low Income
(51-80%)
Moderate
Income
(81-120%)
Above
Moderate
Income
(120%+)
2009
City of Thousand Oaks N/A 17% 12% 16% 55%
Ventura County N/A 23% 17% 19% 41%
2018
City of Thousand Oaks 46,135 18% 13% 16% 53%
Ventura County 270,035 23% 17% 19% 41%
Source: SCAG RHNA Calculator, March 2021. SCAG RHNA 2012 Methodology Appendix VI.

IV. HOUSING INVENTORY AND MARKET

CHARACTERISTICS

1.Housing Growth
Between 2000 and 2010, the rate of housing stock growth in Thousand Oaks (11 percent) trailed the rate of housing growth in neighboring Camarillo (17 percent), Moorpark (18 percent), Simi Valley (14 percent) and Ventura County (12 percent). Agoura Hills was the only neighboring city with a rate lower than the City (nine percent). According to the State Department of Finance, the housing stock in Thousand Oaks was estimated at 48,169 units as of January 1, 2021, representing an approximate

1.4 percent increase from 2010 (Table 11Table 11). The Cities of Camarillo and Moorpark have been growing at much faster rates, at approximately eight percent and six percent since 2010.

Table 11: Housing Unit Growth
Jurisdiction # of Units
2000
# of Units
2010
# of Units
2021
Percent Change
2000-2010
Percent Change
2010-2021
Thousand Oaks 42,958 47,497 48,169 10.6% 1.4%
Camarillo 21,946 25,702 27,907 17.1% 8.6%
Agoura Hills 6,993 7,585 7,643 8.5% 0.8%
Moorpark 9,094 10,738 11,416 18.1% 6.3%
Simi Valley 37,272 42,506 43,644 14.0% 2.7%
Ventura County 251,712 281,694 292,100 11.9% 3.7%
Sources: U.S. Census, 2000 (Table H001) and 2010 (Table QT-H1); California Department of Finance, 2021

2. Unit Type and Size
The number of housing units in Thousand Oaks has increased by 1.4 percent over the last eleven years, from 47,497 units in 2010 to 48,169 units in 2021, according to the State Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates (Table 12Table 12). The biggest change in housing stock can be City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 15
seen in the multi-family units with an increase of more than four percent in the number of units.

Multi-Family complexes with two to four units have seen the most growth showing an 11.5 percent increase in the number of units.

Table 12: Housing Inventory by Unit Type (2010-2021)
Unit Type 2010 2021 % Change
1-unit, detached 32,357 32,526 0.5%
1-unit, attached 5,395 5,412 0.3%
2 to 4 units 1,734 1,934 11.5%
5 or More units 6,808 7,094 4.2%
Mobile home or trailer 1,203 1,203 0%
Total Housing Units 47,497 48,169 1.4%
Sources: California Department of Finance, Housing Estimates, 2010 and 2021 Owner-occupied housing units were predominately single-family detached units (82 percent), while the majority of renter-occupied units were multi-family units (Table 13Table 13). Between 2015 and 2019, more than half of renter-occupied units were two- to three-bedroom units (Table 14Table 14).

Studio and one-bedroom units made up 26 percent of the City’s rental market. The City’s larger housing units (four or more bedrooms) were primarily ownership housing units.

Table 13: Unit Type by Tenure (2015-2019)
Unit Type
Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Total Occupied
Housing Units
Units Percent Units Percent Units Percent
Single-family, detached 26,336 82.2% 4,171 30.5% 31,566 65.9% Single-family, attached 3,716 11.6% 2,096 15.3% 6,199 12.9% Multi-family (2-4 units) 444 1.4% 1,502 11.0% 2,071 4.3% Multi-family (5+ units) 626 2.0% 5,758 42.1% 6,996 14.6% Mobile Homes 919 2.9% 144 1.1% 1,098 2.3%
Other (Boats, RV, etc.) 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Total 32,041 100.0% 13,671 100.0% 47,930 100.0%
Source: American Community Survey, 2015-2019 (Table B25032) Table 14: Unit Size by Tenure (2015-2019)
Unit Size Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Total Occupied Housing Units
Units Percent Units Percent Units Percent
Studio 92 0.3% 602 4.4% 694 1.5%
1 bedroom 300 0.9% 2,910 21.3% 3,210 7.0%
2 or 3 bedrooms 14,563 45.5% 8,134 59.5% 22,697 49.7%
4 or more bedrooms 17,086 53.3% 2,025 14.8% 19,111 41.8% City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 16
Total 32,041 100.0% 13,671 100.0% 45,712 100.0%
Source: American Community Survey, 2015-2019 (Table B25042)

3. Vacancy Rates
A certain number of vacant units are needed to moderate the cost of housing, allow sufficient choice for residents and provide an incentive for unit upkeep and repair. Vacancy rates are generally higher among rental properties, as rental units have greater attrition than owner-occupied units. A healthy vacancy rate ― one which permits sufficient choice and mobility among a variety of housing units ― is considered to be two to three percent for ownership units and five to six percent for rental units.

Housing tenure changed slightly from 2000 to 2015-2019 with the rate of homeownership declining from 75 percent in 2000 to 70.1 percent in 2015-2019 (Table 15Table 15). The proportion of renter households increased from 25 percent to 29.9 percent during the same period. In Thousand Oaks the vacancy rates increased from 2000 to 2015-2019. The overall vacancy rate in 2000 was 0.7 percent and increased to 4.6 percent in 2015-2019. This rise in vacancy rate for renters from 2000 to 2019 can be attributed to an increase in the number of units counted by the ACS for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use, and other vacant units (can be seen mainly among the rate at which rental units are vacant) which accounted for over 85 percent of all vacant units in 2015-2019.

Table 15: Occupancy Status (2000, 2010 and 2015-2019)
Occupancy Status 2000 2010 2015-2019
Tenure
Owner 75.3% 73.1% 70.1%
Renter 24.7% 26.9% 29.9%
Vacancy
Owner 2.4% 1.1% 0.7%
Renter 3.5% 6.1% 4.4%
Overall 0.7% 3.5% 4.6%
Sources: U.S. Census 2000 and 2010 (Table QT-H1), DP-1 and ACS 2015-2019 (Table B25004 and DP-04)

4. Housing Conditions
Age of Housing Stock
The age of a housing unit is often an indicator of housing conditions. In general, housing that is 30 years or older may exhibit a need for repairs based on the useful life of materials. Housing over 50 years old is considered aged and is more likely to exhibit a need for major repairs.

Thousand Oaks is an older community with the majority of its housing stock being built between 1960 and 1989, the majority of which (33 percent) was constructed between 1970 and 1979 according to the 2015-2019 ACS estimates (Table 16Table 16). When housing units reach an age of over 30 years, it is not uncommon for the unit to have rehabilitation needs that may include new plumbing, roof repairs, or other more extensive needs. As the age of a housing unit gets older, the more likely it will City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 17
need to have some sort of rehabilitation repair work done. In Thousand Oaks, approximately 77 percent of the housing stock was built before 1990, some of which could be in need of rehabilitation.

Table 16: Age of Housing Stock (2015-2019)
Year Built Occupied Housing Units
Units Percent
2010 or later 587 1.3%
2000 to 2009 4,574 10.0%
1990 to 1999 5,142 11.2%
1980 to 1989 8,918 19.5%
1970 to 1979 15,291 33.5%
1960 to 1969 9,080 19.9%
1950 to 1959 1,592 3.5%
1940 to 1949 337 0.7%
1939 or earlier 191 0.4%
Total 45,712 100.0%
Source: American Community Survey, 2015-2019 (Table B25036) Housing Conditions
Housing is considered substandard when conditions are found to be below the minimum standard of living conditions defined in Section 1001 of the Uniform Housing Code. Households living in substandard conditions are considered to be in need of housing assistance, even if they are not seeking alternative housing arrangements, due to the threat to health and safety.

In addition to structural deficiencies and standards, the lack of infrastructure and utilities often serves as an indicator for substandard conditions. According to 2015-2019 ACS, 43 owner-occupied units in Thousand Oaks lacked complete plumbing facilities and 18 owner-occupied units lack complete kitchen facilities (Table 17Table 17). Of renter-occupied units, 32 lacked plumbing facilities and 372 lacked complete kitchen facilities.

Table 17: Units Lacking Plumbing or Complete Kitchens (2015-2019) Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Total
Lacking Plumbing Facilities 43 32 75
Lacking Complete Kitchen Facilities 18 372 390
Source: American Community Survey, 2015-2019 (Tables B25049, B25053) It should be noted that there might be some overlap in the number of substandard housing units, as some units may lack both complete plumbing and kitchen facilities. However, the Census typically undercounts substandard housing conditions as it is not able to report on other more subtle housing problems, such as inadequate wiring, leaks, or inadequate or lack of heating. According to estimates by the 2015-2019 ACS, more than 77.5 percent of housing units in Thousand Oaks were built before 1990 and 24.5 percent were older than 1970. A general rule in the housing industry is that structures older than 30 years begin to show signs of deterioration and require some major repairs. The City’s Code Compliance Division responds to citizen complaints about housing that is in poor condition.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 18
Most property owners make the necessary repairs in response to requests or enforcement by the Code Compliance Division. Code Compliance Division records from 2016 and 2019 were analyzed specifically for property maintenance types of cases, as they generally reflect complaints derived from property and buildings not being maintained pursuant to local codes. A total of 1,142 property maintenance cases city wide were reported from 2016-2019. Staff estimates that approximately 50 percent (571) of the property maintenance cases involve building code violations that relate to unit rehabilitation needs. As the Code Enforcement Division responds to complaints and does not conduct proactive inspections, staff conservatively estimates that housing in need of rehabilitation is twice the amount reported to the Code Compliance Division from 2016-2019. However, the City does not have units that are dilapidated and require replacement. Unless properly maintained, homes older than 50 years require major renovations to remain in good working order. The greatest concentrations of older homes are in the Greenwich Village, Waverly Heights, Newbury Park, Old Town West, Royal Oaks and Central Thousand Oaks neighborhoods of the City.

5. Housing Costs and Affordability
Home Prices
Homes located in Thousand Oaks are less affordable compared to nearby cities and Ventura County as a whole (Figure 2Figure 2). The figure below shows the median home sale prices in Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley, Camarillo and Ventura County in June 2020 and June 2021. On average, home sale prices in Thousand Oaks are $215,000 more than home sale prices in surrounding cities and the County as a whole.

Figure 2: Median Home Prices (2020-2021)
Note: Re-sale single family residences and condos as well as new homes.

Source: CoreLogic, California Home Sale Activity by City, June 2020 and June 2021.

Thousand
Oaks Simi Valley Camarillo City ofVentura
Ventura
County
2020 $745,000 $580,000 $612,500 $600,000 $600,000
2021 $950,000 $725,000 $733,500 $742,500 $735,500
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
$900,000
$1,000,000
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 19
Average Rents
Information on current rental rates in the City was obtained through a review of median rents in Zumper.com. Table 18Table 18 summarizes rents by unit size in Thousand Oaks as well as neighboring cities. The list price for rental units in April 2021 ranged from $1,809 for a studio to $3,937 for four-bedroom units. Like home prices, Thousand Oaks also has the highest median rents compared to other Ventura County cities like Simi Valley, Camarillo, and the City of Ventura.

Table 18: Median Rent by Unit Size (2021)
Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom
Thousand Oaks $1,809 $2,071 $2,538 $3,222 $3,937
Simi Valley $1,397 $1,942 $2,296 $2,941 $3,200
Camarillo N/A $1,956 $2,442 $3,031 $3,731
City of Ventura $1,417 $2,010 $2,293 $3,187 $3,273
Source: www.zumper.org, April 2021.

Affordability Gap Analysis
The costs of homeownership and renting can be compared to a household’s ability to pay for housing to determine affordability in a community. Housing affordability is defined as paying no more than 30 to 35 percent of the gross household income (depending on tenure and income level) on housing expenses.

Table 19Table 19 summarizes affordable rents and purchase prices by income category based on the 2021 HCD median income of $98,800 for Ventura County.3 General cost assumptions for utilities, taxes, and property insurance are also shown. Affordable purchase price assumes a three-percent interest rate with a 30-year fixed rate mortgage loan and a 10-percent down payment. Given the high costs of homeownership, lower income households are usually confined to rental housing but the affordability problem also persists in the rental market. The situation is exacerbated for large households with lower and moderate incomes given the limited supply of large rental units, and for seniors with fixed incomes.
3 State and federal income limits differ. For the Housing Element, State income limits are used, which are usually higher than the federal levels used in the City’s Consolidated Plan and other related documents.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 20
V. HOUSING NEEDS
This section provides an overview of existing housing needs in Thousand Oaks. It focuses on four categories:
§ Housing need resulting from housing cost burden;
§ Housing need resulting from overcrowding;
§ Housing need resulting from population growth and demolition of the existing housing stock; and,
§ Housing needs of special needs groups such as elderly persons, large households, persons with disabilities, female-headed households, homeless persons, farmworkers, and college students.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 21
Table 19: Income Categories and Affordable Housing Costs -Ventura County Annual Income
Limits
Affordable
Monthly
Housing
Costs
Rental Utility
Costs (2021)
Ownership
Utilities &
Taxes
Maximum
Affordable
Rent
Affordable
Home Price
Extremely Low Income (0-30% AMI)
1-Person $23,700 $593 $190 $397 $403 $51,424
2-Person $27,100 $678 $199 $436 $479 $63,613
3-Person) $30,500 $763 $225 $492 $538 $71,322
4 Person $33,850 $846 $249 $545 $597 $79,343
5 Person $36,600 $915 $277 $597 $638 $83,741
Very Low Income (30-50% AMI)
1-Person $39,550 $989 $190 $536 $799 $119,303
2-Person $45,200 $1,130 $199 $595 $931 $141,128
3-Person $50,850 $1,271 $225 $670 $1,046 $158,472
4 Person $56,450 $1,411 $249 $743 $1,162 $176,130
5 Person $61,000 $1,525 $277 $811 $1,248 $188,236
Low Income (50-80% AMI)
1-Person $63,250 $1,581 $190 $743 $1,391 $220,800
2-Person $72,300 $1,808 $199 $832 $1,609 $257,186
3-Person $81,350 $2,034 $225 $937 $1,809 $289,091
4 Person $90,350 $2,259 $249 $1,040 $2,010 $321,309
5 Person $97,600 $2,440 $277 $1,131 $2,163 $344,979
Moderate Income (80%-120%AMI)
1-Person $83,000 $2,075 $190 $916 $1,885 $305,381
2-Person $94,850 $2,371 $199 $1,029 $2,172 $353,758
3-Person $106,700 $2,668 $225 $1,159 $2,443 $397,655
4 Person $118,550 $2,964 $249 $1,286 $2,715 $442,078
5 Person $128,050 $3,201 $277 $1,397 $2,924 $475,384
Source: CA Dept. of Housing and Community Development (2021) and Veronica Tam & Associates Assumptions: 2021 HCD income limits; 30% gross household income as affordable housing cost; 35% of monthly affordable cost for taxes and insurance; 10% down payment; and 3% interest rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage loan. Utilities based on 2021 Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura Utility Allowances.

1.Housing Cost Burden
Housing cost burden is generally defined as households paying more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing related expenses, including rent or mortgage payments and utilities. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities. High housing costs can cause households to spend a disproportionate percentage of their income on housing. This may result in payment problems, deferred maintenance or overcrowding.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 22
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) periodically receives "custom tabulations" of Census data from the Census Bureau that are largely not available through standard Census products. The most recent estimates released by HUD in August 2020 are derived from the 2013-2017 ACS. This dataset, known as the "CHAS" data (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy), demonstrates the extent of housing problems and housing needs, particularly for lower income households.

As shown in Table 20Table 20, about half of renter households in Thousand Oaks experienced one or more housing problems and paid more than 30 percent of their incomes towards housing costs in 2013-2017, compared to approximately one-third of City homeowners. The extremely low and very low income households are the most vulnerable groups to cost burdens. With limited income, about 80 percent of the households in these income groups experienced cost burdens, compared to just 36 percent citywide, and 69 percent of low income households. Severe housing cost burden (spending half of the household income on housing) impacted 65 percent of the extremely low income households and 56 percent of very low income households, compared to 30 percent of low income households, 3.8 percent of moderate/above moderate income households, and 17 percent of households citywide. Households with severe cost burdens are most at risk of becoming homeless.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 23
Table 20: Housing Assistance Needs of Lower Income Households (2013-2017) Household by Type, Income & Housing
Problem Renters Owners Total Households
Ext. Low Income (0-30% AMI) 2,040 1,865 3,905
with any housing problems 80.1% 78.0% 79.1%
with cost burden > 30% 77.7% 78.6% 78.1%
with cost burden > 50% 64.0% 66.8% 65.3%
Very Low Income (31-50% AMI) 1,595 2,130 3,725
with any housing problems 86.2% 74.6% 79.6%
with cost burden > 30% 84.6% 74.9% 79.1%
with cost burden > 50% 67.1% 47.9% 56.1%
Low Income (51-80% AMI) 2,680 3,325 6,005
with any housing problems 85.8% 57.1% 69.9%
with cost burden > 30% 84.1% 56.4% 68.8%
with cost burden > 50% 31.2% 29.9% 30.5%
Moderate/Above Moderate Income (81% + AMI) 7,465 25,035 32,500 with any housing problems 24.3% 21.0% 21.8%
with cost burden > 30% 20.6% 20.2% 20.3%
with cost burden > 50% 2.1% 4.3% 3.8%
Total Households 13,780 32,355 46,135
with any housing problems 51.7% 31.5% 37.6%
with cost burden > 30% 48.8% 30.9% 36.2%
with cost burden > 50% 24.4% 13.4% 16.7%
Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2013-2017.

Note: HUD CHAS (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) data is based on tabulations from the ACS and has a smaller sample size than the Decennial Census. Due to the smaller sample size, the data presented may have significant margins of error, particularly for smaller geographies. The intent of the data is to show general proportions of household need, not exact numbers.

2. Overcrowding
The definition of overcrowding used in the Housing Element is more than one person per room.

Some households may not be able to accommodate high cost burdens for housing, but may instead accept smaller housing or reside with other individuals or families in the same home. Household overcrowding is reflective of various living situations: (1) a family lives in a home that is too small; (2) a family chooses to house extended family members; or (3) unrelated individuals or families are doubling up to afford housing. However, cultural differences also contribute to the overcrowded conditions. Some cultures tend to have larger household size than others due to the preference of sharing living quarters with extended family members as a way of preventing homelessness among family members. Overcrowding can strain physical facilities and the delivery of public services, reduce the quality of the physical environment, contribute to a shortage of parking, and accelerate the deterioration of homes.

According to the 2015-2019 ACS, 2.5 percent of all Thousand Oaks households lived in overcrowded conditions (Table 21Table 21). Renter households made up a larger proportion of overcrowded City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 24
households than owner households. Approximately five percent of renter households in Thousand Oaks were overcrowded, compared to just over one percent of owner households.

Table 21: Overcrowding by Tenure (2015-2019)
Jurisdiction
Owners Renters Total
# % # % # %
Overcrowded Households
(1.01-1.5 persons per room) 263 60.7% 517 71.2% 780 67.3% Severely Overcrowded
(1.5+ persons per room) 170 39.3% 209 28.8% 379 32.7%
All Overcrowded Households 433 1.4% 726 5.3% 1,159 2.5% All Households 32,041 70.1% 13,671 29.9% 45,712 100.0%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS, 2015-2019 (Table B25014)

3. Special Needs Groups
Certain groups in Thousand Oaks may have greater difficulty finding decent affordable housing due to special circumstances. Special circumstances may be related to one’s age, family characteristics, disability or employment among others. The table below summarizes these groups in the City of Thousand Oaks. A person or household may be affected by more than one characteristic. For example, a senior living alone may suffer from a disability and living below the poverty level; or a large household may be female-headed and include a senior member. Therefore, the various categories of special needs presented in the table are not mutually exclusive.

Table 22: Special Needs Based on Household Characteristics (2010 and 2015-2019) Special Needs Group
2010 2015-2019
# of Persons/
Households
% of Total
Persons/
Households
# of Persons/
Households
% of Total
Persons/
Households
Households with Members Age 65+ 13,234 28.9% 16,012 35.0% Senior Headed Households 9,401 21.2% 14,234 31.1%
Seniors Living Alone 4,459 9.7% 4,900 10.7%
Large Households (5+ members) 5,167 11.4% 3,952 8.6%
Female-Headed Households 4,260 9.3% 3,830 8.4%
Sources: U.S. Census, 2010 (Table P16); ACS, 2015-2019 (Table B11001) City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 25
Table 23: Special Needs Based on Personal Characteristics (2015-2019) Special Needs Group # of Persons/
Households
% of Total
Persons/
Households
Persons with a Disability 13,132 10.3%
Persons with Developmental Disabilities 1,089 0.9%*
Farmworkers (Total of Agriculture, Fishing, Hunting, Forestry) 289 0.2% Residents Living Below Poverty 6,527 5.1%
Persons Experiencing Homelessness 132 0.1%*
Military Personnel 121 0.1%
Students (Total Enrolled over 3 years of age) 32,995 25.8% *Percent of Ventura County Population in 2020, according to the California Department of Finance 2020 Population Estimates.

Sources: ACS, 2015-2019 (Table S2406, S1401, DP03); Ventura County Homeless Count and Subpopulation Survey: Final Report, 2020.California Department of Developmental Services, Consumer Count by California Zip Code.

Seniors
Seniors (persons age 65 and above) are gradually becoming a more substantial segment of a community’s population. Americans are living longer and having fuller lives than ever before in our history and are expected to continue to do so. Elderly-headed households are vulnerable to housing problems due to limited income, prevalence of physical or mental disabilities, limited mobility, and high health care costs. The elderly, particularly those with disabilities, may face increased difficulty in finding housing accommodations.

Senior headed households cover about 31 percent of the households in the city, showing how the population is growing or aging in place. Approximately 35 percent of the households in Thousand Oaks have a member over the age of 65, and 10 percent of all households are seniors living alone (Table 22Table 22). Between 2010 and 2015-2019, the proportion of elderly residents over 65 years old increased notably; in 2010, seniors represented approximately 15 percent of the City’s population compared to 19 percent in 2015-2019.

Persons with Disabilities
Federal laws define a person with a disability as "any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; has a record of such impairment; or is regarded as having such an impairment.” In general, a physical or mental impairment includes hearing, mobility, cognitive and visual impairments, chronic alcoholism, chronic mental illness, AIDS, AIDS Related Complex, and intellectual disability that substantially limits one or more major life activities.

Major life activities include walking, talking, hearing, seeing, breathing, learning, performing manual tasks, and caring for oneself.

The U.S. Census Bureau classifies disabilities into the following categories:
§ Hearing difficulty: Deaf or having serious difficulty hearing § Vision difficulty: Blind or having serious difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses § Cognitive difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty remembering, concentrating, or making decisions
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 26
§ Ambulatory difficulty: Having serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs § Self-care difficulty: Having difficulty bathing or dressing § Independent living difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping According to the 2015-2019 ACS, approximately 10 percent (13,132 persons) of the Thousand Oaks population over five years of age had one or more disabilities. The ACS tallied the number of disabilities by type for residents with one or more disabilities. Of those disabilities tallied by the ACS in 2019, ambulatory and cognitive difficulties were the most common (Table 24Table 24). However, the prevalence of certain disabilities varied by age. For example, cognitive difficulties accounted for 85 percent of disabilities tallied among 5 to 17 years old, while hearing and ambulatory difficulties among seniors are at 13 and 22 percent respectively.

Table 24: Disability Characteristics (2019)
Disability by Age and Type 5 to 17 years 18 to 64 years 65 years and over Total Total Persons with a Disability 1,172 4,714 7,246 13,132 Disability Type
Hearing Difficulty 147 931 3,301 4,379
Vision Difficulty 137 841 1,259 2,237
Cognitive Difficulty 993 1,920 1,963 4,876
Ambulatory Difficulty 257 1,772 4,246 6,275
Self-Care Difficulty 300 739 1,871 2,910
Independent Living Difficulty1 N/A 1,622 3,070 4,692
Notes:

1. Tallied only for persons 18 years and over
Source: ACS, 2015-2019 (Table B18102 – B18107)
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
As defined by State law, “developmental disability” means a severe, chronic disability of an individual who:
§ Is attributable to a mental or physical impairment or combination of mental and physical impairments;
§ Is manifested before the individual attains age 184
;
§ Is likely to continue indefinitely;
§ Results in substantial functional limitations in three or more of the following areas of major life activity: a) self-care; b) receptive and expressive language; c) learning; d) mobility; e) selfdirection; f) capacity for independent living; or g) economic self-sufficiency; and § Reflects the individual’s need for a combination and sequence of special, interdisciplinary, or generic services, individualized supports, or other forms of assistance that are of lifelong or extended duration and are individually planned and coordinated. 4 The State of California defines developmental disabilities slightly differently than federal law. The main difference is at the manifestation age, where federal definition established that threshold at age 22.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 27
The Census does not record developmental disabilities. According to the University of Minnesota’s Institute on Community Integration, as of 2016, an estimated 2.2 percent of the United States’ population had an intellectual or developmental disability. This equates to about 2,780 persons in the City of Thousand Oaks based on the January 2020 population reported by the California Department of Finance. While there are no survey data estimates of the population with developmental disabilities in Thousand Oaks, the State Department of Developmental Services reported that approximately 1,089 Thousand Oaks residents sought out services at the Regional Center as of June 2020.

Approximately 52 percent of assisted residents were adults over 18 years of age. Most of the clients with developmental disabilities (90 percent) resided in a private home with their parents or guardians.

Families with Children and Single Parent Households
According to the 2010 Census, approximately 40 percent of all households in Thousand Oaks and Ventura County had children under the age of 18. Single-parent households, particularly femaleheaded households, often require special consideration and assistance as a result of their greater need for affordable housing, as well as accessible day care, health care, and other supportive services. Due to their relatively lower per-capita income and higher living expenses such as day-care, single-parent households have limited opportunities for finding affordable, decent, and safe housing.

According to the 2015-2019 ACS, approximately 2,240 single-parent households resided within Thousand Oaks, representing five percent of the City’s households. The majority (68 percent) of these single-parent households were female-headed. Of particular concern are single-parent families with lower incomes; approximately 17 percent (257 families) of the City’s female-headed families had incomes below the poverty level in 2015-2019. These female-headed households account for nearly 85 percent of all single-parent family households with incomes below the poverty level.

Large Households
Large households are defined as those with five or more members. These households are usually families with two or more children or families with extended family members, such as in-laws or grandparents. It can also include multiple families living in one housing unit in order to save on housing costs. Large households are a special needs group because the availability of adequately sized, affordable housing units is often limited. To save for necessities such as food, clothing, and medical care, lower- and moderate-income large households may reside in smaller units, resulting in overcrowding.

In 2010, approximately 11 percent of all households in Thousand Oaks had five or more members.

Specifically, eight percent of owner-households and nine percent of renter-households in the City were considered to be large households. In 2015-2019, the proportion of large households in Thousand Oaks (8.6 percent) was lower than at the County level (14 percent).

Persons Experiencing Homelessness
The member agencies of the Ventura County Continuum of Care Alliance worked together to conduct the Ventura County 2020 Homeless Count and Subpopulation Survey, a Point-in-Time count of the region’s homeless population. HUD’s definition of homelessness for Point-in-Time counts was used.

The definition includes:

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 28
§ An individual or family living in a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designated to provide temporary living arrangement (including congregate shelters, transitional housing, and hotels and motels paid for by charitable organizations or by federal, state, or local government programs for low-income individuals), or
§ An individual or family with a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings, including a car, park, abandoned building, bus or train station, airport, or camping ground.

The Ventura County 2020 Homeless Count and Subpopulation Survey counted 152 sheltered and unsheltered individuals in Thousand Oaks, representing less than one percent of the County’s homeless population.
5 Of these individuals, the survey counted 22 sheltered and 130 unsheltered. As part of the Point-in-Time Count, volunteers were able to survey 108 of the 130 unsheltered adults counted. Approximately 86 percent of homeless persons interviewed were white, 32 percent were women, and 20 percent were seniors (62 years or older). Survey respondents reported the following disabling conditions: substance abuse problem (25 percent); mental health problem (13 percent); developmental disabilities (11 percent); and physical disability (17 percent). Approximately seven percent of the respondents reported experiencing homelessness because fleeing domestic violence, 27 percent had been released from a correctional institution during the past year, and 20 percent were homeless for the first time within the past year.

Due to COVID-19, the point in time count was not conducted for unsheltered persons. However, a sheltered count was conducted in January 2021 and 119 persons sheltered in Thousand Oaks. The 2020 annual call data for Ventura County 2-1-1 included 226 homeless residents in Thousand Oaks and 117 at-risk of homeless households.

During 2021, year to date data from the VC CoC Coordinated Entry System includes 155 at-risk households and 366 homeless households in Thousand Oaks.

Farmworkers
Farm worker households tend to have high rates of poverty, live disproportionately in housing which is in the poorest condition, have very high rates of overcrowding, have low homeownership rates, and are predominately members of minority groups. Specific information is lacking with regard to the housing needs of migrant and non-migrant farm workers in the City. Thousand Oaks is not an agricultural center as are cities and unincorporated communities located to the north and closer to the Pacific Ocean. The majority of residents are not employed by agricultural interests. According to the 2015-2019 ACS, there were 289 (0.5 percent) people employed in the “Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting and Mining” industry in Thousand Oaks. It is unknown how many people of the 289 counted by ACS were directly employed in agricultural production, since the Census definition of agricultural also includes promotional and marketing activities.

Official counts of farmworkers also significantly underestimate the true numbers, with undocumented and poor residents most likely to be undercounted. Farmworkers are notoriously difficult to count 5 The =Ventura County Continuum of Care did not perform a Point-in-Time count in 2021 due to COVID-19.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 29
due to their mobility, the shared and substandard housing available to them, their fear of authorities, and their lack of involvement in a foreign and unfamiliar culture.

Nonetheless, data from the 2018 American Community Survey (ACS) reports that there is a total of 18,319 farmworkers in Ventura County with 2,668 living in the unincorporated areas of the County.

The ACS data is not a good representation of the farmworker population since the data combines persons employed in farming with persons employed in forestry, fishing, and hunting, and does not provide any distinction between high and low wage occupations. The ACS also excludes labor provided by farm labor contractors, which significantly underestimates the number of farmworkers.

It is estimated that roughly one third of all California farmworkers are employed by farm labor contractors. The 2017 U.S. Census of Agriculture, prepared by the Department of Agriculture, reported that there were 22,694 farmworkers in the County. Of the total, 10,529 (46%) worked 150 days or more, and 12,165 (54%) worked less than 150 days.

A Farm Labor study conducted by the University of California in Davis, estimates an even higher number of farmworkers in Ventura County. The study utilized wage and tax data from the California Employment Development Department, and estimated that Ventura County employed approximately 36,500 farmworkers in 2012. Therefore, depending on the data source, the estimated number of farmworkers in Ventura County ranges from 18,000 to 36,500 persons. Based on information received from the Ventura County Agricultural Commissioner and the local House Farm Workers! Task Force, the higher end of the range is more accurate and should be used for estimating farmworker housing needs.

College Students
A significant presence of college students in a community usually places additional pressure on the local rental housing market. Typically, students need affordable rental housing near the college and their length of stay tends to be transient, revolving around the semesters.

There are 12 colleges and universities located within 20 miles of Thousand Oaks. 6 Of these, two are four-year public colleges: California State University-Channel Islands and California State UniversityNorthridge. In 2019, approximately 42,016 students were enrolled in undergraduate programs in these public schools, and about 12,890 degrees were completed. Another seven private colleges or universities, including California Lutheran University, located in and around the City enroll another 10,404 undergraduate students. In 2019, a total of 6,068 degrees were completed at private colleges and universities, including 3,167 that were offered online. There are three community colleges in the Ventura County area where students can earn two-year associate degrees. In 2019, about 36,560 students were enrolled in undergraduate courses at nearby community colleges, with 7,733 graduates. 6 https://www.franklin.edu/colleges-near/california/thousand-oaks City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 30
Estimate of Needs
State law requires quantification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs of special needs populations. Extremely low income is defined as households with income less than 30 percent of area median income (AMI). The 2021 AMI for Ventura County was $98,800. For ELI households, this results in an income of $33,850 or less for a four-person household.

The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) developed by the Census for HUD provides detailed information on housing needs by income level for different types of households (owners versus renters, elderly households, and large and small households) in Thousand Oaks.

Detailed CHAS data based on the 2013-2017 ACS is displayed in Table 25Table 25. Housing problems considered by CHAS include:
• Units with physical defects (lacking complete kitchen or bathroom); • Overcrowded conditions (housing units with more than one person per room); Housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 30 percent of gross income; or • Severe housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 50 percent of gross income.

However, the CHAS data does not provide separate accounting of overcrowding or substandard housing conditions. These are included in the overall category of households with housing problems, and a household can have multiple housing problems. The types of problems vary according to household income, type, and tenure. Overall, 38 percent of all households in the City experienced some housing problems. However, housing problems were more prevalent among extremely low and very low-income households, especially among the elderly and large families. Within the extremely low-income group, housing cost burden a similar proportion of renters and owners (about 80 percent), indicating the unaffordability of both ownership and rental housing stock to low-income households.

Additionally, 65 percent of ELI households paid more than 50 percent of their income toward housing costs and were severely cost burdened, compared to 17 percent of all Thousand Oaks households.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 31
Table 25: Estimated Housing Needs for Special Needs Populations Renters Owners
All HH
Elderly Lg HH
(5+)
Total
Renters Elderly Lg HH (5+)
Total
Owners
Ext. Low Income (0-30% AMI) 705 50 2,040 1,185 20 1,865 3,905 with any housing problems 63.1% 100.0% 80.1% 80.2% 100.0% 78.0% 79.1% with cost burden > 30% 63.1% 100.0% 77.7% 81.0% 100.0% 78.6% 78.1% with cost burden > 50% 47.5% 100.0% 64.0% 65.0% 100.0% 66.8% 65.3% Very Low Income (31-50% AMI) 570 100 1,595 1,325 145 2,130 3,725 with any housing problems 86.8% 75.0% 86.2% 72.5% 93.1% 74.6% 79.6% with cost burden > 30% 83.3% 75.0% 84.6% 72.8% 96.6% 74.9% 79.1% with cost burden > 50% 61.4% 65.0% 67.1% 44.5% 31.0% 47.9% 56.1% Low Income (51-80% AMI) 525 235 2,680 1,815 290 3,325 6,005 with any housing problems 85.7% 85.1% 85.8% 50.1% 89.7% 57.1% 69.9% with cost burden > 30% 85.7% 76.6% 84.1% 50.4% 79.3% 56.4% 68.8% with cost burden > 50% 51.4% 25.5% 31.2% 27.5% 24.1% 29.9% 30.5% Moderate/Above ModIncome (81% +
AMI) 995 605 7,465 7,595 2,350 25,035 32,500
with any housing problems 39.2% 32.2% 24.3% 19.5% 24.5% 21.0% 21.8% with cost burden > 30% 32.7% 26.4% 20.6% 19.6% 18.7% 20.2% 20.3% with cost burden > 50% 10.6% 3.3% 2.1% 5.2% 1.7% 4.3% 3.8% Total Households 2,795 990 13,780 11,920 2,805 32,355 46,135 with any housing problems 63.7% 52.5% 51.7% 36.1% 35.3% 31.5% 37.6% with cost burden > 30% 60.6% 47.0% 48.8% 36.3% 29.6% 30.9% 36.2% with cost burden > 50% 37.9% 19.7% 24.4% 18.9% 6.2% 13.4% 16.7% Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2013-2017.

Extremely low-income and very low individuals and families with children who are currently renting are often at imminent risk of homelessness due to rent burden. High rent burden, especially when rent is above 50 percent of monthly income, makes low-income households more at risk to miss a rent payment when combined with household costs such as transportation, food, medical bills, and other necessities. Failure to pay rent is one of the most common causes of eviction within the United States.

Should a household be evicted, it becomes difficult to find replacement housing, either due to cost and availability constraints or many landlords’ unwillingness to rent to those with an eviction record.

The household may subsequently become homeless.

Some households may also be stable in terms of rental payments but a rental cost increase can cause increased cost burden and missed payments. Rental cost increases are a significant cause of families losing housing. Rapid rehousing programs and one-time eviction prevention financial assistance may help these homeless individuals or families. While this type of assistance can be helpful, challenges associated with this type of assistance include high housing costs that many households struggle to City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 32
continue making rental payments after a life event that causes a missed house payment, such as the loss of employment, vehicle repair, or large medical bills. Homeless prevention assistance, though helpful in the case of short-term financial instability, doesn’t prevent evictions for households that cannot afford to sustain increased rental costs in the long term. In addition, the low rental vacancy rate, high rents, and general lack of affordable housing units makes finding any new unit a challenge after an eviction. Formerly homeless families receiving short-term rental housing or rapid rehousing assistance find replacement housing is difficult near the termination of that assistance for some of the same reasons many become homeless in the first place: high housing costs and a high amount of competition for units among renters that results in many formerly homeless individuals denied housing due to eviction or other legal records. This population needs both a long-term source of housing funding, employment which pays enough to pay for rent, and/or social services that help alleviate any underlying health or other personal issues that prevent successful retention of long-term housing.

Other populations disproportionately at risk of becoming homeless (experiencing disproportionate housing problems) are those with substance abuse and/or severe mental health problems, youth aging out of foster care, and people exiting incarceration. Should members of these groups also be extremely low-income, the risk of homelessness increases. These groups may also have other immediate social barriers or challenges that prevent navigation of the competitive local housing market. The number of low-income individuals at risk of homelessness due to housing cost burden is difficult to determine and can be affected by housing vacancy rates, the average size and age of households (who may or may not be able to find emergency housing by “doubling up” in housing), poverty levels, the severity of housing cost burden, the types of rental tenancy (which factor into state of California eviction law), and numerous other social factors.

Resources Available to Assist Special Needs Populations The greatest underserved community need is affordable housing for lower and moderate-income persons (including extremely low income) and other special needs populations. Ventura County is home to a large number of nonprofit organizations that serve the special needs population. The City addresses the housing and supportive service needs of the special needs groups through its partnership with nonprofits, such as the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura, Many Mansions, and County of Ventura. Through these partnerships, the City was able to create/improve 345 affordable units for the special needs groups (see later Table 26Table 26).

The City, through its CDBG program and Community Social Service Grant Fund (CSSG), continues to address homeless needs and supportive housing and service needs of seniors and persons with disabilities. The City is committed to using CDBG funds to support the rehabilitation of existing affordable rental and owner units to help ensure they remain available for occupancy by lower-income households for the remaining years of the affordability period. In addition, the City is committed to supporting the delivery of public and social services to lower-income persons with special needs.

Annually, 15 percent of the CDBG funds are used to provide supportive services, with a strong emphasis on homeless needs and homeless prevention services. To supplement the CDBG funds, the City leverages close to 15 percent of its CDBG entitlement grant with at least $100,000 in local general funding to the Community Social Services Grant Funds to create a social service grants budget that funds approximately 25 operational grants.

Public and Social Services Grants: Through its non-profit partners that deliver public and social services to at-risk persons and households, the City supports numerous programs that assist working City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 33
mothers to retain employment through full or part-time pre-school programs, after-school tutoring, supplemental food, low or no-cost medical care, and other services with at least 12 non-profit organizations. Examples include:
• Conejo Free Clinic – Medical Services Program
• Conejo Recreation and Park District – Conejo Creek Homework Tutoring. • Harbor House – Homeless Emergency assistance, Winter Shelter, Meals Program • Lutheran Social Services – Homeless Emergency Services, Winter Shelter, Drop-in Center • Manna Conejo Valley – Community Food Bank
• Senior Concerns – Meals on Wheels Program
• St. Vincent de Paul Society – Poor and Homeless Program • Westminster Free Clinic – Economic Response Program
Emergency Shelter: The City uses CDBG funds to support Turning Point Foundation and Our Place Safe Haven which serves seven homeless clients by providing shelter and case management.

Before COVID-19, annually, from December through March, the Conejo Valley Winter Shelter provided a nightly 30-bed program organized by Harbor House and implemented by volunteers at seven houses of faith. In early March 2020, the winter shelter had to close due to the Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Project Roomkey at Motel 6 leased and run by the County of Ventura began in the City as a result of funding provided by the State of California. City Staff and Thousand Oaks Police Department worked closely with local social service providers to identify and transport high risk homeless to Motel 6 during the pandemic. Those over the age of 65 and those with health conditions were prioritized for shelter. From January to June 2021, CDBG-CV funds were used for non-congregate shelter to prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19.

Transitional Housing: The City uses CDBG funds to support the County of Ventura RAIN program, a transitional housing facility with supportive services that could serve approximately four Thousand Oaks families each year.

Furthermore, the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program remains the most important housing assistance to lower income households, especially those with extremely low incomes. As of June 2021, 545 Thousand Oaks households (including approximately 246 households with disabilities, 138 senior households, and 161 family households) were receiving Housing Choice Vouchers while there were 263 Thousand Oaks households on the waiting list, including 82 elderly and 40 disabled resident households. HUD policy requires that 70 percent of the new vouchers are allocated to extremely low income households, many are special needs populations (including seniors, disabled, and formerly homeless). The City will continue to promote the use of HCVs to enhance housing affordability and expand housing/locational choices for these vulnerable segments of the community as part of Program 15.

VI. PUBLICLY ASSISTED HOUSING

1.Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 34
The Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura (AHAVC) is an independent, non-profit agency providing opportunities and assistance to people in need of affordable housing through development, acquisitions, and partnerships and serves as the housing authority for Thousand Oaks.

In Thousand Oaks, AHAVC owns three public housing apartments Fiore Gardens, Florence Janss, and Leggett Court as well as six affordable apartments. AHACV administers the Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCV) for Thousand Oaks residents. As of June 2021, 545 Thousand Oaks households (including approximately 246 households with disabilities, 138 senior households, and 161 family households) were receiving Housing Choice Vouchers. For the distribution of Voucher assistance within the City, AHACV has established local preferences for disabled, veterans, elderly, working family, substandard living conditions, job training program, and having Section 8 revoked due to HUD funding shortage. AHACV closed the HCV program waiting list in November 2020 and added a total of 3,000 residents countywide. As of June 2021, there were 263 Thousand Oaks households on the waiting list, including 82 elderly and 40 disabled resident households.

2. Affordable Housing Projects
Housing developments utilizing federal, state, and/or local programs, including state and local bond programs, Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), density bonus, or direct assistance programs, are often restricted for use as low income housing and provide another source of affordable housing for a jurisdiction.

Table 26Table 26 shows that there 25 rental developments within the City of Thousand Oaks that participate in a federal, state or local program that provided some form of assistance to lower income households, either through financial subsidy or a control measure. These projects provide a total of 1,142 units affordable to lower income households and of these, 173 units are at-risk of conversion between 2021 and 2031.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 35
Table 26: Publicly Assisted Housing Affordable Units
Property
Name
Total
Project
Units
Total
Affordable
Units
Household
Type Funding Source Owner Expiration of Affordability
Arroyo Villas 206 40 Family Section 8. Private 2025
Conejo Future
Apartments 90 90 Senior Section 202, Section 811, (Annual Renewals). Private*** 9/30/2024 Los Arboles 43 43 Family FHA, RDA. AHAVC* 2028
Total At-Risk 173
Leggett Court 49 49 Family HUD, CITY. HUD Public
Housing 2036
Mountclef
Apartments 18 18 Family FHA Section 236, Section 8. Private 2047 Stoll House 11 11 Family LIHTC, HOME, RDA. Many Mansions 2052 Esseff Village 51 50 Supportive
Housing

LIHTC, HOME, RDA, CDBG,
AHP, SHP, COC. Many Mansions 2056
Oak Creek
Senior Villas 57 56 Senior LIHTC, HOME, RDA AHAVC 2058
Richmond
Terrace 27 26 Supportive Housing

HOME, MHP, RDA,
Conventional Loan, COC. Many Mansions 2059
Hacienda de
Feliz 25 24 Family LIHTC, Multi-Family Revenue Bond, HOME, RDA. Many Mansions 2059 Bella Vista 72 72 Family Tax-exempt 501c(3) bond,
HOME, RDA, CDBG. Many Mansions 2060
Shadows 147 147 Family LIHTC, Bond, RDA. Private 2062
Hillcrest Villas 60 59 Family HOME, MHSA, RDA, AHP. Many Mansions 2068 Garden View
Terrace 56 56 Family LIHTC, Multi-Family Revenue Bond, RDA, CITY, CDBG. AHAVC 2068 Villa Garcia 80 79 Family LIHTC, Multi-Family Revenue
Bond, RDA. Many Mansions 2069
Shadow Hills 101 100 Family Tax-exempt 501c(3) bond,
RDA. Many Mansions 2070
Schillo
Gardens 29 28 Family LIHTC, RDA. Many Mansions 2071
77 North
(Jemstreet) 37 3 Family Density Bonus. Private 2076
Florence
Janss
64 64 Senior HUD, RDA. HUD Public
Housing 2095
Sunset Villas 11 11 Family CALHFA, HELP Loan, RDA. AHAVC N/A* Fiore Gardens 51 50 Family HUD, RDA. HUD Public
Housing N/A*
Glenn Oaks 39 39 Senior RDA, Section 8 Tenants. AHAVC N/A* Royal Oaks 5 5 Family Section 8 Tenants. AHAVC N/A*
Children’s Aid
Guild House 11 10 Special Needs Section 202, RDA.

Hillcrest
Housing
Foundation
N/A**
Spastic
Children HSE 11 10 Special Needs Section 202, RDA. Bel Air Housing Foundation N/A** Total Units 1,142
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 36
Table 26: Publicly Assisted Housing Affordable Units
Property
Name
Total
Project
Units
Total
Affordable
Units
Household
Type Funding Source Owner Expiration of Affordability
Abbreviations: AHP: Multi-Family Programs (HCD); CITY: City of Thousand Oaks; FHA: Federal Housing Administration (HUD); COC: Continuum of Care (HUD); HOME: HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HUD); CDBG: Community Development Block Grant (HUD); MHP: Multifamily Housing Program (HCD); LIHTC: Low Income Housing Tax Credit; MHSA: Mental Health Services Act; RDA: Thousand Oaks Redevelopment Agency; Section 2020: Supportive Housing (HUD); Section 811: Persons with Disabilities (HUD); SHP: Supportive Housing Program (HCD); *AHAVC units are owned by an independent, non-profit agency whose mission is to provide affordable housing. As such, these units are not at-risk of conversion to market rate housing. **Facility is owned by national charitable organization dedicated to serving the needs of persons with disabilities. The facility is not at-risk of conversion to market rate housing.
***The property is governed by a Declaration of Restrictions recorded on March 6, 1974, limiting use of the property to the development of subsidized housing for seniors. Owners annually applies for and received Section 202 and Section 811 HUD funding.

Source: HUD Multi-family and Section 8 Database, Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura, Details of Assistance by Community, 2020.

3. Units at Risk of Converting to Market-Rate Housing
According to California Government Code Section 65583(a)(8), (c)(6), jurisdictions must evaluate the potential for currently rent restricted low-income housing units to convert to non-low-income housing in ten years, and propose programs to preserve or replace these units. For this Housing Element, this ten-year analysis period covers from June 30, 2021 through June 30, 2031. This section identifies the City’s assisted units “at-risk” of conversion to market rate housing.

According to the affordable housing inventory there are three properties with a total of 173 units that may be in jeopardy of losing their affordability during the next planning period. These properties are Arroyo Villas, Conejo Future, and Los Arboles Apartments. Arroyo Villas was developed with density bonus and has 206 market rate units and 40 scattered affordable units conditioned for 30 years. Conejo Future, developed with a Declaration of Restrictions recorded on March 6, 1974, limits the use of the property as affordable senior housing. Conejo Future continues to apply to receive annual HUD Section 202 and Section 811 for Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments. AHAVC owns Los Arboles, so its risk-of-conversion is lower. Without the Conejo Future and Los Arboles units, the units at-risk of conversion are 40.

4. Preservation Cost Analysis
Transfer of Ownership
Transferring ownership of an at-risk project to a non-profit housing provider is generally one of the least costly ways to ensure that the at-risk units remain affordable for the long term. By transferring property ownership to a non-profit organization, low-income restrictions can be secured indefinitely and the project would become potentially eligible for a greater range of governmental assistance.

According to the Kidder Mathew Multi-family market trends for 2021, a 50-unit multifamily property sold in the first quarter of 2021 for $16.1 million, or $322,000 per unit. This does not include the rehabilitation costs associated with transfer of ownerships. Transfer of ownership for the 40 at-risk units in Arroyo Villas would cost about $12.9 million. However, transfer of ownership is not a feasible City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 37
option for the Arroyo Villas development since its 40 affordable units are scattered within the 246 units in the development.

Replacement of Units
The construction of new low-income housing units is a means of replacing the at-risk units, should they be converted to market-rate units. The cost of developing housing depends upon a variety of factors, including density, size of the units (i.e. square footage and number of bedrooms), location, land costs, and type of construction. In 2020, the first major market rate multi-family development since 2007 secured a $59 million loan for a mixed-use development in the City. The project will include 142 class A apartment units, 9,820 square feet of ground-floor retail and 239 parking spaces, upon completion. Using this project, the cost per unit is about $415,000. This is in line with the per-unit estimates reported by UC Riverside’s Center for Economic Forecasting and Development7 in 2020, where per-unit costs for a 75-unit development ranged from $476,149 in Oxnard to $579,133 in Los Angeles. Using an estimate of $415,000 per unit, the cost of replacing the 40 units at-risk would be $16.6 million.

Rental Assistance
Rental subsidies using non-federal (State, local or other) funding sources can be used to maintain affordability of the at-risk affordable units. These rent subsidies can be structured to mirror the federal Section 8 program. Under Section 8, HUD pays the difference between what tenants can pay (defined as 30 percent of household income) and what HUD estimates as the payment standard on the unit.

In Ventura County, the payment standard for Fiscal Year 2020-21 is determined to be $1,550 for a one-bedroom unit, $1,943 for a two-bedroom unit, and $2,709 for a three-bedroom unit. Since the subsidy depends on the renter’s income level and unit size, calculating the cost to preserve the units using rental assistance is complex. However, assuming that a one-person very low income household is renting a one bedroom apartment, the subsidy would be $751 per month, or $9,012 per year. 8 Based
on the estimates and assumptions above, approximately $360,500 in rent subsidies would be required annually for the 40 at-risk units.

5. Resources and Programs for Preservation
According to Section 65583(a)(8)(C) of the California Government Code, the Housing Element should identify public and private nonprofit organizations that have the capacity to acquire and manage assisted housing developments. Inclusion on this list should be based on the entity’s expression of interest in acquiring and managing such projects.

Until 2012, the Thousand Oaks Redevelopment Agency was a significant source of funding for the development of affordable housing by receiving approximately $4 million annually for low and moderate-income level housing. However, in 2011, the State enacted legislation to dissolve all 7 Chong, Hoyu. (February 2020). “Economy White Paper Series: Demystifying the High Cost of Multifamily Housing Construction in Southern California.” UC Riverside’s Center for Economic Forecasting and Development. https://ucreconomicforecast.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/UCR_CEFD_Multifamily_Housing_WhitePaper_3_2020.pdf 8 Maximum affordable monthly rent is for a one person very low income household is $799 (see Table 20Table 20) and FMR for a one bedroom unit is $1,550; Thus $1,550- $799 = $751 monthly subsidy.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 38
redevelopment agencies and use redevelopment agency revenue to help close the States’ budget deficit.

Cities and counties sued to block the measure and on December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court ruled in favor of the State. Redevelopment agencies were dissolved in February of 2012, thereby eliminating a major source of funding for affordable housing.

The City and the former Thousand Oaks Redevelopment Agency primarily partnered with two nonprofit entities to provide affordable housing and preserve affordable housing opportunities in the community. These include: 1) Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura, formed under a Joint Powers Agreement among the cities of Camarillo, Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks and Ventura County; and 2) Many Mansions, a California nonprofit corporation. Both of these entities continue to express interest in acquiring and managing additional affordable housing projects. The City has also partnered with for-profit developers (Arroyo Villas, Shadows Apartments and others) to provide or preserve affordable housing.

City and former Redevelopment Agency, in cooperation with affordable housing partners have utilized a variety of funding sources to finance affordable housing projects including, but not limited to:

Housing Successor Funds (Former Redevelopment Agency Housing Funds Tax Increment financing), Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Tax Credits, Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG), other State and Federal funding sources including HOME funds, Multi-family Housing Program funds, Affordable Housing Program (AHP) funds, Housing Enabled by Local Partnerships Program (HELP) funds, Housing Bond Funds, Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA), Housing Trust Fund Ventura County (HTFVC), and private lending sources.

VII. FUTURE GROWTH NEEDS

1.Overview of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment
The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) must be considered by local governments in their plans for future growth. The RHNA quantifies the anticipated need for housing within each jurisdiction for the planning period of June 30, 2021 to October 15, 2029. Communities then determine how they will address this need by updating the Housing Elements of their General Plans.

The current RHNA was adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and approved by HCD in March 2021. The future need for housing for the region is determined primarily by the forecasted growth in households and existing needs due to overcrowding and cost burden. Each new household, created by a child moving out of a parent's home, by a family moving to a community for employment, and so forth, creates the need for a housing unit. The housing need for new households is then adjusted to maintain a desirable level of vacancy to promote housing choice and mobility. The sum of these factors – household growth, vacancy need, and replacement need – determines the projected new unit construction need for the region. SCAG then took into account transit accessibility (high quality transit areas (HQTAs) population) and job accessibility, among other factors, to allocate a share of the region’s housing needs to each jurisdiction in the region.

The housing need is distributed among four income categories9 on the basis of the County’s income 9 Although AB 2634 requires Housing Elements to consider the needs of extremely-low-income households, the RHNA does not quantify the need for this category.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 39
distribution, with adjustments to avoid an over-concentration of lower income households in any community.

2. 2021-2029 RHNA Allocation
The final RHNA allocation for the City of Thousand Oaks is shown below:

Table 27: Thousand Oak’s Share of Regional Housing Needs Income Level RHNA % RHNA Allocation
Extremely Low/Very Low (30-50%)1 735 28.0%
Low (50-80%) 494 18.8%
Moderate (80-120%) 532 20.3%
Above Moderate (120>%) 860 32.8%
Total 2,621 100.0%
1 City has a RHNA allocation of 735 very low income units (inclusive of extremely low income units). Pursuant to State law (AB 2634), the City must project the number of extremely low income housing needs based on Census income distribution or assume 50 percent of the very low income units as extremely low. Assuming an even split, the City’s RHNA allocation of 735 very low income units may be divided into 368 very low and 367 extremely low income units. However, for purposes of identifying adequate sites for the RHNA allocation, State law does not mandate the separate accounting for the extremely low income category.

Source: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), 2021.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 40
Resources
This section summarizes the resources available for the development, rehabilitation, and preservation of housing in Thousand Oaks. The analysis includes an evaluation of the adequacy of the City’s land inventory to accommodate Thousand Oaks’ regional housing needs goals for the 2021-2029 planning period. Financial resources available to support housing activities and the administrative resources available to assist in implementing the City’s housing programs are also analyzed in this section.

I. REGIONAL GROWTH NEEDS – 2021-2029
Table 28Table 28 shows the City’s total RHNA for the current Housing Element Cycle (Cycle 6), which covers the eight-year planning period of June 30, 2021 to October 15, 2029. It should be noted that the RHNA did not specifically identify growth needs for extremely-low-income (ELI) households. Consistent with state law, the City’s ELI need is assumed to be one-half of the very low income category, and sites considered suitable for lower income housing may also accommodate ELI units.

Table 28: RHNA Allocation (2021-2029)
Income Categories
Extremely
Low
Very
Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total
RHNA 368 367 494 532 860 2,621
% 14.0% 14.0% 18.8% 20.3% 32.8% 100.0%
Sources: Southern California Association of Governments, 2021.

1.Inventory of Sites for Housing Development
Section 65583(a)(3) of the Government Code requires Housing Elements to contain an “inventory of land suitable for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having potential for redevelopment, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites.” A detailed analysis has been prepared of vacant land and potential redevelopment opportunities (see Appendix C).

A discussion of public facilities and infrastructure needed to serve future development is contained in Section 4: Housing ConstraintsHousing Constraints. There are currently no known service limitations that would preclude the level of development reflected in the City’s RHNA allocation. Developers are required to pay fees and construct public improvements related to the demand their projects place on infrastructure prior to, or concurrent with, development.

The land inventory includes pipeline projects (housing developments that have been approved but not permitted), pending projects, and vacant and underutilized sites with potential for development.

The parcel-specific vacant and underutilized site analysis was performed using the City’s Geographic Information System (GIS) data and information from the County Assessor’s database. The vacant and underutilized land inventory includes only lots that could realistically be developed based on an City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 41
examination of existing conditions, and enhanced feasibility offered by the EndorsedPreferred Land Use Map. Detailed assumptions and methodology for the residential land inventory are summarized in Appendix C.

The estimated capacity of every parcel in the land inventory was based on the minimum density allowed under the Draft Preferred Endorsed Land Use Map endorsed by City Council on May 25, 2021 as part of the General Plan 2045 update process. This map creates a new mixed-use designation, Mixed-Use, that allows for both standalone residential, mixed-use commercial/residential, and commercial development, with a density range of 20 to 30 du/ac. The sites inventory also uses sites in the Neighborhood Medium-High and Neighborhood Low-Medium, which have density ranges of 20 du/ac – 30 du/ac and 6 du/ac to 10 du/ac, respectively. Table 29Table 29 summarizes the City’s strategy to meet its RHNA obligations for the 6th Cycle Housing Element period.

Table 29: Land Inventory Summary to Meet RHNA
Income Categories
Very Low Low Moderate Above
Moderate Total
RHNA 735 494 532 860 2,621
Potential ADU 5436 11174 153102 4228 360240
Pipeline (Entitled but Not Permitted) 22
16 94 10
4 1,103
1,015
1,229
1,129
Pending Projects (in Planning Process) 0
9 32 0 481
420
522
Total CREDITS 76
61 237
200
163
106
1,626
1,524
2,009
1,891
Remaining Need 659
674
257
294
369
426 0
1,285
1,3941
Remaining Need (Combining Very Low and Low) 916
968
369
426 0 1,2851,3941
All Sites 1,527 614 154 2,295
Mixed-Use (20-30 du/ac) 1,239 453 78 1,770
Mall Sites (20-30 du/ac) 288 137 0 425
Neighborhood Medium-High (20-30 du/ac) 0 24 0 24
Neighborhood Low-Medium (6-10 du/ac) 0 0 76 76
Shortfall/Surplus Combined2 +611
559
+245
188 +154
+1010
901

1. Remaining need based on sum of remaining need of 916968 low and 369426 moderate units, not the difference between total credits and total RHNA.

2. Shortfall/surplus calculated based on remaining RHNA need.

II. FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCES

1. State and Federal Resources
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 42
Federal funding for housing programs is available through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As an Entitlement City, Thousand Oaks participates in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The City’s 2021-2022 CDBG entitlement grant totaled $573,500. During the program year, $150,000 was allocated to home rehabilitation programs for low income owner/occupants through the Habitat for Humanity and Senior Alliance for Empowerment (SAFE) organizations. The City also allocated $188,445 to replace the roof of 12 affordable units in the Los Arboles Apartments through the Area Housing Authority. The City used 15% of its annual CDBG entitlement for grants or $85,000 for grants to non-profit agencies providing social services to help address the needs of low and very low-income households, including special needs populations.

Uses of federal funds are described in detail in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Usually, CDBG funds can be used in areas where at least 51% of the households have annual incomes that are less than 50% of the Area Median Family Income (MFI). Because Thousand Oaks meets HUD’s “exception criteria”, the City is permitted to use CDBG funds in areas where at least 36.50%10 of the households earn less than 50% of the Area MFI.

Section 8 Rental Assistance
The City maintains membership in and is served by the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura, which administers the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program. In June 2021, the Area Housing Authority assisted 545 lower-income households in Thousand Oaks with Section 8 vouchers. The Section 8 vouchers assist lower-income households by paying the difference between 30% of an eligible household's income and the actual cost of renting a unit.

Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program was created by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 to provide an alternate method of funding low-and moderate-income housing. Each state receives a tax credit, based upon population, which can be used to fund housing that meets program guidelines. The tax credits are then used to leverage private capital into new construction or acquisition and rehabilitation of affordable housing. Limitations on projects funded under the Tax Credit programs include minimum requirements that a certain percentage of units remain rent-restricted, based upon median income. Thousand Oaks has leveraged tax credits with other resources for several affordable housing projects in the City.

Mortgage Credit Certificates (MCC)
This program provides a federal tax credit for income-qualified homebuyers’ equivalent to 20% of the annual mortgage interest. Generally, the tax savings are calculated as income to help buyers qualify to purchase a home. The City participates in this program as a member of a countywide consortium with the County of Ventura and other local cities. The County will pursue funding for this program whenever it is available.
10 Section 105(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, states that an activity shall be considered to principally benefit low and moderate income persons when "the area served by such activity is within the highest quartile of all areas within the jurisdiction of such city or county in terms of the degree of concentration of persons of low and moderate income." The highest quartile in Thousand Oaks for FY 2021 based on 2015 ACS was 36.29 percent.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 43
Other State and Federal Resources
These programs generally provide for predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily, residential live-work, rental housing that is affordable to Extremely low, Very low, Low, or Moderate income households.

In 2020, the County of Ventura and Cities of Camarillo, Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks created the Ventura County Home Investment Partnerships HOME Consortium to drastically increase the amount of HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding dedicated to affordable housing. With the County of Ventura as the lead agency in partnership with the cities, the HOME Consortium hopes to spur new affordable housing development within the HOME Consortium area. Estimated annual HOME Consortium allocation is $1.3 million.

The Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB 2, 2017) established the Permanent Local Housing Allocation program (PLHA), which provides an ongoing permanent source of funding to local governments in California to address the state's housing crisis. The County administers the PLHA funding for the Ventura Urban County Entitlement Area jurisdictions and the City of Thousand Oaks. The five-year estimate for the PLHA funds is $1.8 million.

City and local affordable housing developers have also utilized other state and federal funding sources to help provide affordable housing where possible. HOME funds have been awarded to non-profit Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO) as residual receipts loans. In 2016, Many Mansions used California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (CTCAC) 4% Bond financing for the acquisition and rehabilitation of Schillo Gardens (28 affordable units) to extend the affordability for 55-years and for the refinanced the Shadow Hills apartments, (100 affordable units).

2. Local Resources
Community Social Services Grant Fund
The City annually leverages 15% of its CDBG entitlement grant with at least $100,000 in local general funds for Community Social Services Grants (CSSG) to increase the budget for grants to local nonprofit agencies providing essential services to low-income persons and households.

Affordable Housing Programs/ Housing Trust Fund
In order to provide additional funding sources for affordable housing, on September 9, 2008, the City Council adopted an ordinance creating certain affordable housing programs. The ordinance created a housing trust fund, an inclusionary housing program and a nonresidential development linkage fee program. Under the inclusionary housing program, certain residential projects are required to allocate 10% of the units as affordable housing or pay an in-lieu fee. Resolutions were also approved establishing the inclusionary housing in-lieu fee and nonresidential development linkage fee.

The City’s Inclusionary Housing in-lieu fee was initially set at $9,000 per detached single-family dwelling and $25,000 per condominium/townhome unit. Nonresidential development linkage fees were established at $4.50 a square foot for retail/commercial land uses and, $2.50 a square foot for City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 44
office and lodging use categories. Depending on density and development type, these fees could generate approximately $28.6 to $42.4 million for affordable housing through build out of the City.

The in-lieu fee and non-residential development linkage fee were set to $0.00 in May of 2009 in consideration for the weak market conditions. Staff reported back to Council on June 8, 2010, June 28, 2011, June 26, 2012, and December 18, 2012 with an evaluation of market conditions. Each time Council had set the fees at $0 due to continued weakness in the economy in general, and the residential and commercial real estate markets in particular. On December 18, 2012, City Council directed Staff to report back with an updated analysis of the in-lieu and non-residential linkage fees and recommend adjustments, if appropriate. On September 10, 2013 and September 11, 2014 staff prepared memorandums recommending the fee remain at $0 based on an updated financial analysis. The balances in the City’s Housing Trust Fund and the Housing Successor Fund (Former Redevelopment Low Moderate Fund), as of September 2021, are approximately $3.4 million and $2.2 million respectively. These resources are available to support future affordable housing projects.

Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA)
The City received three grants from the State HOME Investment Partnerships Program for the City’s Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) from 2004 to 2013. Recently, the City began to collect a small amount of residual receipts payments from the Oak Creek Senior Villa project, the only HOME loan the City manages. Once the City receives the $1 million loan payment or collects a sufficient amount of residual receipts, the City anticipates reopening the TBRA program.

3. Partnership with Nonprofit Housing Developers
Area Housing Authority
The City is served by the Area Housing Authority of Ventura County (AHAVC), a public housing authority of which the City is a member. There are 3 public housing sites in Thousand Oaks totaling 163 units. The AHAVC assists lower-income households in Thousand Oaks. AHAVC owns six apartment complexes with over 200 affordable units and households assisted by the AHAVC in the City include the 550 Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8) totaling $7.7 million. The AHAVC provides opportunities for residents to get involved in management and participation in:
• Attending Resident Council or Resident Advisory meetings; • Being a member of the Resident Council or Resident Advisory Committee; and • Becoming a Resident Commissioner on the AHAVC Board of Commissioners.

AHAVC strives to help families build self-confidence and self-sufficiency through programs and services that empower households to build a strong financial and educational foundation. Senior programs are designed to maintain health and independence.

Habitat for Humanity
Habitat for Humanity is an international organization that assists in providing homeownership opportunities for lower income households. Through volunteer labor and donations, members of the local chapters assist families in building or rehabilitating housing. One of the goals of the program is City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 45
to provide long-term affordable housing. Habitat for Humanity of Ventura County (“Habitat”) is active in Thousand Oaks as well as other areas of the County. In Thousand Oaks, Habitat has developed four permanent affordable units and operates an owner-occupied residential rehabilitation program.

Many Mansions
Many Mansions is a non-profit affordable housing and services agency that has been very active in the Thousand Oaks area for over 40 years. The organization provides a variety of services and programs including owning and managing affordable housing developments. The City has collaborated with Many Mansions to acquire existing housing units for preservation as affordable units and to construct new units to increase the City’s inventory of affordable and workforce housing units. Many Mansions owns nine affordable apartment complexes in the City including over 450 units. Examples of City/Many Mansions collaborations include development of Bella Vista, Esseff Village (motel conversion), Hacienda de Feliz, Richmond Terrace, and Schillo Gardens Apartments.

Many Mansions also provides a variety of support programs for its residents and the community, including:
• Children’s programs for its resident children, including an after-school homework tutoring program, a summer camp program, the back-pack school supplies program and life skills programs for teens;
• Adult programs for its resident adults, including emergency food through FOOD Share, counseling, case management, job development and parenting training for its formerly homeless residents and/or persons with disabilities; and • The “More-Than-Housing” office which is a community resource center with information on housing and other social services throughout the Conejo Valley.

Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC)
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC) is another non-profit housing and services agency. The organization provides comprehensive housing services to individuals and families who are in need throughout Ventura and Santa Barbara counties. CEDC builds, rehabilitates and manages affordable housing. CEDC also provides education, counseling and lending services to help low and moderate income households become homeowners.

Ventura County Community Development Corporation (VCCDC) Ventura County Community Development Corporation (VCCDC) is a Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) certified by the U.S. Department of Treasury. As an adopter of the National Industry Standards, VCCDC serves the community with high levels of homeownership services. VCCDC also provides education, counseling and lending services to help low and moderate income households become homeowners. VCCDC assisted the City with selling two lower-income units conditioned to remain affordable for 45-years which included a community outreach workshop, review of buyer’s qualifications, working with escrow, and follow-up with the buyers post purchasing.

Housing Rights Center (HRC)
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023June 2023 46
Housing Rights Center (HRC) is the nation's largest non-profit civil rights organization dedicated to securing and promoting Fair Housing. HRC provides a program to actively inform tenants and, landlords, on state and federal housing laws pertaining to fair housing. HRC provide outreach and education services, take in and process fair housing-related complaints to resolution, and referral services. HRC provides a wide array of programs and services to all Thousand Oaks residents free of charge:
• Landlord-Tenant Counseling,
• Predatory Lending Information & Referrals,
• Housing Discrimination Investigation, Enforcement & Advocacy, and • Outreach & Education.

4. Energy Conservation Opportunities
State law requires all new construction to comply with "energy budget" standards that establish maximum allowable energy use. These requirements apply to such design components as structural insulation, air infiltration and leakage control, setback features on thermostats, water heating system insulation (tanks and pipes) and swimming pool covers if a pool is equipped with a fossil fuel or electric heater. State law also requires that a tentative tract map provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, including designing the lot sizes and configurations to permit orienting structures to take advantage of a southern exposure, shade or prevailing breezes.

Southern California Edison and the Southern California Gas Company offer energy conservation programs to residents of Thousand Oaks including audits of home energy use to reduce electricity consumption, refrigerator rebates, appliance repair and weatherization assistance to qualified low income households, and buyer’s guides for appliances.

Changes to the state’s building energy efficiency standards for new construction, known as Title 24, went into effect on July 1, 2009. The standards for new homes require windows that are more resistant to heat and better insulated, more efficient lighting, heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, and “cool roofs” that stay cooler than normal roofs when exposed to the sun. These changes will substantially reduce the amount of energy consumed in every new residence.

The City’s guidelines for development of residential, industrial and institutional projects (Resolution No. 2006-108), require additional energy conservation measures in building design. These measures include, but are not limited to, extended eaves or roof overhangs, external shade features, and solartreated glass for south and west facing windows. The City also maintains a page with energy programs listed on the City's website: http://www.toaks.org/departments/publicworks/sustainability/energy/energy-programs-home.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 47
Housing Constraints
I. GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
Governmental constraints are potential and actual policies, standards, requirements, fees, or actions imposed by the various levels of government on development, which serve to ensure public safety and welfare with respect to housing construction and land use issues. Federal and state programs and agencies play a role in the imposition of non-local governmental constraints and are beyond the influence of local government, and therefore cannot be effectively addressed in this document.

1. Transparency in Development Regulations
The City website provides a range of information to facilitate the development application and review process under pages dedicated to the Community Development Department (www.toaks.org/departments/community-development). Online resources include:
• Building permit application
• Planning applications
• Fee Schedules
• General Plan
• Development activities
The Municipal Code (including Zoning) is available under the City Clerk’s Office (www.toaks.org/departments/city-clerk/municipal-code).

In response to COVID-19, the City offers the Virtual Public Counter, www.toaks.org/departments/community-development/virtualcounter, which allows an applicant to submit development applications online.

2. Land Use Element
Each city and county in California must prepare a comprehensive, long-term General Plan to guide its future. The Land Use Element of a General Plan designates the general distribution, location, and extent of uses for land planned for housing, business, industry, open space, and public or community facilities. As it applies to housing, the Land Use Element establishes a range of residential land use categories, specifies densities (typically expressed as dwelling units per acre [du/ac]), and suggests the types of housing appropriate in a community.

A number of factors, governmental and non-governmental, affect the supply and cost of housing in a local housing market. The allowable density range of residentially designated land is the governmental factor that most directly influences these market conditions. In general, higher densities allow developers to take advantage of economies of scale, reduce the per-unit cost of land and improvements, and reduce development costs associated with new housing construction. Reasonable City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 48
density standards ensure the opportunity for higher-density residential uses to be developed within a community, increasing the feasibility of producing affordable housing, and offer a variety of housing options that meet the needs of the community.

The City of Thousand Oaks is in the process of a comprehensive General Plan update), which is anticipated to be completed in 2022. The new General Plan will include new land use designations; however, since these designations have not yet been formally adopted, the Housing Element contains a discussion of both the existing land use designations as well as the proposed designations.

The City’s existing Land Use/Circulation Element Map provides for a range of residential building types and densities in various areas of Thousand Oaks. Table 30Table 30 summarizes the land use designations within the City that allow residential uses, as well as their permitted densities. The residential land use designations of the Land Use/Circulation Element Map can be grouped into four broad density categories: Very Low Density Residential (Up to 2.0 dwellings per net acre), Low Density Residential (2.0 to 4.5 dwellings per net acre), Medium Density Residential (4.6 to 15.0 dwellings per net acre) and High Density Residential (15.0 to 30.0 dwellings per net acre). The Land Use/Circulation Element Map also contains Reserve Residential (up to 2.0 dwellings per net acre for ultimate need) and Residentially Developable Land (0.2 to 1.0 dwellings per net acre for ultimate need), a Mobile Home Exclusive category, and one flexible Commercial/Residential designation for a specific parcel governed by a specific plan allowing either commercial or residential uses in accordance with a specific plan.

Table 30: Existing General Plan Residential Land Use Designations Land use Designation Description
Permitted Density
(du/acre)
Min Max
Residentially Developable
Land
Areas of potential limited very low density residential development, primarily reserved for natural open space due to topographic constraints. 0.2 1.0 Reserve Residential Areas of limited very low density residential development, primarily reserved for natural open space due to topographic constraints. 0.0 2.0 Very Low Density
Residential
This density is characteristic of large single-family estate lots and equestrian estates, often in environmentally sensitive areas or areas of steep slope.

0.0 2.0
Low Density Residential This density would include predominantly single-family detached or attached homes. 2.0 4.5
Medium Density
Residential
Medium density may include townhouses, garden and condominium apartments and mobile homes. This density should be located predominantly near major centers of activity.

4.6 15.0
High Density Residential
Dwelling units can be of any type and should be located primarily at sites accessible and close to major centers of activity and along the Ventura Freeway.

15.0 30.0
Mobile Home Exclusive Mobile Home Exclusive land use category established in August 2008 for the existing mobile home parks in City. N/A N/A
Sources: City of Thousand Oaks Land Use/Circulation Element Map, April 2018; and Municipal Code, 2019.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 49
In May 2021, the City Council endorsed a Draft Preferred Land Use Map with new land use designations as part of the General Plan 2045 update process. Some of the draft land use designations are similar to existing designations; however, a new mixed-use designation that allows for both residential and commercial development has been incorporated. Table 31Table 31 summarizes the draft land use designations that allow for residential development, as well as their permitted densities.

Table 31: General Plan 2045 Draft Land Use Designations Draft Land Use
Designation Description Density(du/ac and/or FAR)
Maximum
Height
Neighborhood Rural
Very low density single-family neighborhoods; applied to areas with significant topography and/or necessitate a
transition from residential areas to preserved open
spaces.

Up to 1 du/ac 35'
Neighborhood Very Low
Very low density single-family neighborhoods with intent of preserving single-family large lot developments in
areas of some topography.
> 1-2 du/ac 35'
Neighborhood Low
Single-family neighborhoods at a variety of densities with the intent of protecting existing single-family areas and provide for infill development at a similar scale as the surrounding residential context.
> 2-6 du/ac 35'
Neighborhood Low-Medium
Includes a variety of attached and detached housing
units oriented for walking and biking while still accessible by car.
> 6-10 du/ac 35'
Neighborhood Medium
Provides for a mix of lower-scaled attached multi-family homes in a walkable setting, often close to existing or proposed retail and commercial uses.
> 10-20 du/ac 35'
Neighborhood
Medium-High
Provides for “missing middle” housing types in a
walkable neighborhood setting. Included are a variety of attached housing types within walking distance of retail, services and major centers of activity.
> 20-30 du/ac 50'
Mobile Home Exclusive Provides for existing mobile home parks. None defined 35' Mixed-Use
Provides for neighborhood serving goods and services
and multi-family residential in a mixed-use format or as stand-alone projects.
> 20-30 du/ac; 1.0
FAR 50'
Source: City of Thousand Oaks Land Use Alternatives Briefing Book, 2021

3. Measure E
Measure E was adopted in response to a ballot initiative passed by the electorate in November 1996.

This ordinance requires that any amendment to the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan that would increase the amount of commercial acreage or the maximum number of residential units beyond that allowed under the General Plan Land Use Element is subject to voter approval.

Since Measure E was approved, there have been no amendments to the Land Use Element that have required a vote of the electorate. Currently, there are approximately 48,169 units in the City (Department of Finance, January 2021) and the maximum number of units allowed per the City’s General Plan of November 5, 1996 is 81,124. Therefore, to date, Measure E has not been a significant impediment to the development of housing. Although the cost, delay and uncertainty of holding such City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 50
elections could eventually pose a constraint on housing development, Measure E is not a constraint at this point. Additionally, the endorsed Preferred Land Use Map has sufficient capacity to accommodate housing growth during this Housing Element projection period while not exceeding the maximum potential number of residential units established in 1996.

4. SOAR
The Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) initiative was passed by the voters of Ventura County in November of 1998 and renewed by voters in November 2016. The SOAR initiative established the “City Urban Restriction Boundary” (CURB) that created a prohibition on most urban development outside of the City’s Sphere of Influence now extended until December 31, 2050, unless approved by the electorate. However, it exempts development that will help fulfill the City’s highest priority housing need as required by State law (i.e. for low and very low income housing). The Parks Initiative (Measure W) was also passed that protects the “Existing Parks, Golf Course, and Open Space Category” within the City’s boundaries from changes to the General Plan and land use designation unless approved by the electorate.

Most of the area outside of the City’s Sphere of Influence allows for very low density residential development. Although SOAR and the Parks Initiative (Measure W) limit the amount of development, they are not a significant constraint on the development of housing in Thousand Oaks.

5. Zoning Regulations
The Zoning Code is the primary tool for implementing the goals and policies of the General Plan and the Land Use/Circulation Element Map. It is designed to protect and promote public health, safety and welfare, as well as to promote quality design and quality of life. The City’s residential zoning districts control both the use and development standards of each residential lot or parcel, thereby influencing the development of housing. Thousand Oaks has established nine zoning districts that allow residential uses:
• Rural-Agricultural Zones (R-A)
• Rural-Exclusive Zones (R-E)
• Single-Family Estate Zones (R-O)
• Single-Family Residential Zones (R-1)
• Two-Family Residential Zones (R-2)
• Residential Planned Development Zones (R-P-D)
• Multiple-Family Residential Zones (R-3)
• Trailer Park Development Zones (T-P-D)
• Hillside Planned Development Zones (H-P-D)
As previously noted, the City is in the process of updating its General Plan, including its Land Use Element. After adoption of General Plan 2045, implementation of the new Land Use Element will necessitate updates to the Zoning Code. Since General Plan 2045 is still in development and Zoning Code amendments are not yet proposed, the following sections discuss the existing Zoning Code.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 51
Development Standards
Table 32Table 32 summarizes the City’s residential zoning districts and their development requirements. Maximum density, minimum lot area, required setbacks, and maximum heights can all impact the number and type of units that can be built on a given parcel, particularly for multi-family residential development. The R-3 and R-P-D zones do allow for heights above 25 feet when increased setbacks or when projects provide affordable housing specified in the Housing Element (see footnote in Table 32Table 32). However, these standards are important to maintain consistency in development with a particular zone, maintain quality of life, and protect the public health, safety and welfare.

Table 32: Residential Development Standards by Zoning District Zoning District R-O R-1 R-2 R-P-D R-3 R-A R-E T-P-D H-P-D SP-20 Max. Density
(du/a) 2 6 12 301 30 1 4 12 varies10 3012
Min. Lot Area11
(SF) 20,000 7,000 7,000 5,5002 7,000 43,560 10,000 3,5003 n/a n/a Min. Front Yard
(ft.) 35 20 20 204 20 20 20 20 20
0 min15
max
Min. Interior
Side Yard (ft.) 5+ 5+ 5+ 5-155&6 8-106 5+ 5+ 5 20 0
Min. Interior
Rear Yard (ft.) 20 20 20 20+7 20 20 20 5 20 10
Max. Building
Height (ft.) 25-358 25-358 25-358 25+9 259 25-358 25-358 32 259 50 Notes:

1. Low density (0 to 4.5 du/a), medium density (4.55 to 15 du/a), and high density (15 to 30 du/a) may be approved in the R-P-D zone.

2. For single-family dwellings, 5,000 square-foot minimum is allowed provided that the average lot size is 5,500 square feet. There is no minimum lot size for multi-family development in the R-P-D zone.

3. 2,500 square-foot minimum net lot area is allowed for each individual or combined trailer unit provided that the average net lot area per trailer unit is 3,500 square feet, exclusive of roadways, recreational areas, or any other common facilities. Each trailer park site must be a minimum of 10 acres.

4. When adjacent to any public street. The setback may be reduced to 15 feet except where adjacent to primary or secondary highways and provided the structures are staggered by 10 feet or more.

5. Varies by housing type (single-family detached dwellings, zero lot line, townhouse, an apartment).

6. Decision-making body may modify the additional side yard setback requirements when necessary to allow structures taller than 25 feet if providing affordable housing to lower income households specified in the Housing Element of the Thousand Oaks General Plan.

7. Minimum 20 feet for one- and two-story single-family structures and 40 feet minimum distance between directly opposite rear walls. Rear yards for multiple-family or townhouse dwellings are specified as part of the Residential Planned Development Permit where deemed necessary by the Planning Commission.

8. May increase to 35 feet if two side yards are each 15 feet.

9. May increase provided that each side yard is increased by a minimum of 6 inches for each 2 feet of additional height over 25 ft. Decisionmaking body may modify the additional side yard setback requirements when necessary to allow structures taller than 25 feet if providing affordable housing to lower income households specified in the Housing Element of the Thousand Oaks General Plan.

10. The maximum allowable density in the H-P-D zone varies based on the slopes within the area.

11. Subzones of each of the R zones may be established whereby the requirements for the parent R zone apply except as to minimum lot area and minimum lot width, which shall be fixed by the use of a suffix on the zoning designation (i.e. R-1-8 is a subzone of the R-1 zone requiring a minimum lot area of 8,000 square feet.

12. Thousand Oaks Boulevard allows unlimited density when residential is directly above nonresidential space fronting on Thousand Oaks Blvd.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 52
Source: City of Thousand Oaks Zoning Code, 2021
To implement the new General Plan, the new mixed-use zone, including Specific Plans, will be aligned with the land use map and ensure that parking, setbacks, building height and open space requirements allow development to achieve the maximum allowable density identified under the land use map adopted as part of the General Plan Update. Program 1 includes a timeline for these actions. To comply with State law regarding adequate sites, the mixed use zone will allow for stand-alone residential uses.

Parking Requirements
Table 33Table 33 summarizes residential parking requirements in Thousand Oaks. Parking requirements may constrain residential development primarily by reducing the amount of available lot area for residential structures. Additionally, the cost to construct required parking facilities, particularly for multi-family projects, contributes to the overall development cost of a project, therefore increasing the per unit cost of housing. The City determines the required number of parking spaces based on the type and size of the residential unit. These parking standards are consistent with other suburban communities. To incentivize the development of affordable housing, reduced parking requirements are implemented for projects qualifying for a density bonus pursuant to State density bonus law. To implement the proposed General Plan, the City will update its development standards, including an evaluation of parking, to ensure that maximum allowable density can be achieved in each zone. The City’s Zoning Code does allow for shared parking opportunities between residential and commercial uses and also allows for tandem parking for residential uses by right. Furthermore, the City will address its compliance with AB 2097, which eliminates parking mandates for housing need high transit areas.

In recent years, the State has adopted new regulations related to how jurisdictions may regulate parking for emergency shelters and supportive housing projects (AB 2162 and AB 139). The Housing Program of the Housing Element includes amending the Zoning Code to update parking requirements for these uses pursuant to State law. These requirements are discussed in more detail in the following section.

Height Limits
The Zoning Code will be updated to implement the proposed General Plan, with the following proposed height limits:
• 35 feet: Neighborhood Rural; Neighborhood Very Low; Neighborhood Low; Neighborhood Low-Medium; Neighborhood Medium
• 50 feet: Neighborhood Medium-High; Mixed Use
The increase in height limits would facilitate the development of multi-family housing in the community.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 53
Table 33: Residential Parking Requirements
Type of Residential Development Required Parking Spaces Single-Family Dwellings in R-A, R-E, R-O, R-1,
and R-2 Zones.
2 spaces (enclosed) per unit; 3 spaces (2 enclosed) per unit with 5-6 bedrooms; 4 spaces enclosed per unit with 7 or more bedrooms. Covered parking may be authorized only in special circumstances as determined by the Community Development Director.

Single-Family Dwelling in R-P-D and H-P-D
Zones.
2 spaces (enclosed) per unit; 3 spaces (2 enclosed) per unit with 5-6 bedrooms; 4 spaces enclosed per unit with 7 or more bedrooms.

Apartments Dwellings (Unrestricted Units)
Studio / One-bedroom units 1 space (covered) per unit.

Two-bedroom units 1.5 spaces (1 covered) per unit.

Three or more bedroom units 2 spaces (1 covered) per unit.

Plus an additional 0.5 spaces per unit for guest parking.

Apartment Dwellings (Senior Citizens) 1 covered space per unit, plus an additional 0.25 space per unit for guest parking.

Apartment Dwellings (Persons with Disabilities) Parking based on study provided by the developer to substantiate parking need.

Attached Condominiums or Townhomes
(Unrestricted Units)
2 spaces (enclosed or covered) per unit, plus an additional 1 space per unit for guest parking.

Accessory Dwelling Units None required for studio/efficiency units; 1 space per unit for units with 1 or more bedrooms1
Mobile Home Parks 2 spaces (may be in tandem, 1 covered for each site); plus 1 space per each unit for guest parking.

Convalescent Hospitals, Skilled Nursing
Facilities, and Nursing Homes 0.75 spaces per bed.

Assisted Living Facilities 0.6 spaces per bed.

Continuing Care Retirement Communities 1.4 spaces for each independent living unit, plus parking required for the assisted living and skilled nursing components of the community.

Emergency Shelters 1 space per staff person during the largest shift, plus 0.2 space for each resident.

Notes:

1. Not applicable if the accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile of public transit, located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district, or is part of the existing primary residence or an existing accessory structure, and when on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.

Source: City of Thousand Oaks Zoning Code, 2021
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 54
Variety of Housing Opportunity
The City of Thousand Oaks Zoning Code accommodates a range of housing types in the community.

Permitted housing types include one-family residences (including manufactured homes), multiplefamily housing, mobile homes, accessory dwellings, transitional and supportive housing, emergency shelters, agricultural worker housing, as well as housing to meet special needs such as large residential care facilities. Table 34Table 34 and Table 35Table 35 summarize the types of housing permitted in each of the residential, commercial, and industrial zones and whether they are permitted by right or require approval of an administrative or discretionary permit.

Table 34: Permitted Residential Uses (Residential Zoning Districts) Residential Use Type R-A R-E R-O/
R-1 R-2 R-3 RPD1 RPDSFD2 HPD HPDSFD TPD SP-20
One-family Dwellings PPD PPD PPD PPD PPD RPD RPD HPD HPD Mobile Home Park TPD
Two-family Dwellings PPD RPD RPD HPD
Accessory Dwellings P P P P P P P P P P P
Multiple-family Dwellings
--Apartments
--Single Room
Occupancy Units
--Condominiums
--Townhouses
RPD RPD HPD P/SUP3
Residential Care/Small
(≤ 6 persons) P P P P P P P P P P P
Residential Care/Large
(≥ 7 persons) SUP SUP SUP P/SUP4
Farm Cottages PPD PPD P
P = Permitted/Ministerial; PPD = Precise Plan of Design Permit/Community Development Director; RPD = Residential Planned Development Permit/Planning Commission or Community Development Director; HPD = Hillside Development Permit/Planning Commission; TPD = Trailer Park Development Permit/Planning Commission; SUP = Special Use Permit/Planning Commission.

Notes:

1. In the RPD Zone, any housing type is permitted, and the maximum density is as designated by the density subzone (e.g., RPD-7U is limited to seven dwellings per net acre). Applications for residential planned development permits for five or more dwellings are subject to Planning Commission approval. Applications for four or fewer single family detached units within the RPD zone are processed administratively by the Community Development Director.

2. Only single-family dwellings are permitted in the RPD-SFD Zone. Applications for residential planned development permits for five or more dwellings are subject to Planning Commission approval. Applications for four or fewer single family detached units within the RPD zone are processed administratively by the Community Development Director.

3. Standalone multifamily are permitted in areas not fronting on Thousand Oaks Blvd. Special Use Permits are required mixed-use development along Thousand Oaks Blvd.

4. Special Use Permit is allowed for Adult Day Care in Thousand Oaks Blvd. Specific Plan.

Source: City of Thousand Oaks Zoning Code, 2021
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 55
Table 35: Permitted Residential Uses (Non-residential Zoning Districts) Residential Use Type C-O C-2 C-3 C-4 M-1 M-2 P-L
Emergency Shelters SUP SUP1 SUP SUP
Residential Care/Large (≥ 7 persons) SUP SUP
Farmworker Housing P P P
P = Permitted/Ministerial; SUP = Special Use Permit/Planning Commission.

Notes:

1. Permitted by right in Rancho Conejo Industrial Park Specific Plan 15 Municipal Code Appendix A 4.D.

Source: City of Thousand Oaks Zoning Code, 2021
Single-family and Multiple-Family Dwelling Units
Single- and multi-family housing types include detached and attached single-family homes, duplexes, townhomes, condominiums, and multi-family rental apartments. Single-family housing units are generally permitted in all of the City’s residential zoning districts with approval of a Precise Plan of Design Permit (PPD) by the Community Development Director. Two-family dwellings are permitted in the R-2, R-3, RPD, and HPD zones with approval of a PPD, RPD, or HPD permit, dependent upon the zone.

Multiple-family housing developments with more than two units, including apartment buildings, townhomes, condominiums, and single room occupancy developments are permitted in the R-3, RPD, and HPD zones with approval of an RPD or HPD permit.

Accessory Dwelling Units
An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation, complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, is located on a lot with an existing or proposed main house, and includes an entrance separate from the main house. ADUs can provide needed affordable housing for lower income households and seniors in Thousand Oaks as they typically rent for less than apartments.

They can also meet the need for multi-generational housing.

On January 28, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1678-NS to implement new regulations for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in residential zones. These new regulations were adopted in response to multiple changes in State law, including AB 68, AB 587, AB 881, and SB 13, which modified the fees, application process, and permissible development standards that a jurisdiction may impose on ADUs, with the goal of lowering barriers to ADU development.

Thousand Oaks allows three types of ADUs: junior (created within existing home); attached (created as an addition to existing home); and detached (free-standing structure or attached to accessory structure). Junior ADUs (JADUs) have an efficiency kitchen and may share bathroom facilities with the primary residence. An efficiency kitchen includes cooking appliances and food preparation space and may or may not include a sink. Attached and detached ADUs have a full kitchen and separate bathroom facilities.

ADUs/JADUs are only permitted on residentially zoned lots, including in multi-family zones. ADUs may be built on any size lot but must comply with applicable zoning requirements including setbacks.

One junior and one attached or detached ADU are allowed on single-family lots. Multifamily lots may have two detached ADUs and attached ADUs equal to 25 percent of the multi-family units. The City’s City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 56
ADU Ordinance includes development standards regulating unit size, parking, building height, and setbacks, which are all in compliance with state regulations.

As required by State law, ADUs are only subject to ministerial review and a building permit for an ADU must be approved within 60 days of the submission of a complete application.

Manufactured Housing / Mobile Home Parks
State law requires local governments to permit manufactured or mobile homes meeting federal safety and construction standards on a permanent foundation in all single-family residential zoning districts (Section 65852.3 of the California Government Code). Per City’s Zoning Regulations, “mobile home” means the following:

A structure, as defined under California Civil Code Section 798.3, designed for human habitation as a dwelling and can be transported over streets and highways under permit in accordance with the California Vehicle Code. This term shall include “manufactured homes” as defined in the Health and Safety Code Section 18007. A recreational vehicle shall not be considered to be a mobile home unless it has been manufactured with plumbing, heating and electrical systems for human habitation and it occupies a mobile home site in a mobile home park where that recreational vehicle is permitted to be used as a permanent residence in accordance with Civil Code Section 798.3(b). The term mobile home shall not include a commercial coach as defined by Health and Safety Code Section 18010 or factorybuilt housing as defined by Health and Safety Code Section 19971.

Applications for the development of manufactured homes currently are processed in the same manner and subject to the same standards as conventional single-family homes. However, this practice has not been formalized in the Zoning Code. Therefore, a Zoning Code amendment has been included in the Housing Programs of this Housing Element to allow manufactured homes as a permitted use in all single-family residential zoning districts, subject to the same development standards as conventional homes, and provided they are on a permanent foundation and meet federal safety and construction standards (Program 7).

Mobile home parks are allowed with Planning Commission approval of a Trailer Park Development Permit (TPD) in the T-P-D zoning district. There are currently eight mobile home parks in the City.

Per the City adopted measure in 2008, any future change to the land use designation and zoning requires approval by a vote of the people, unless park tenants receive certain payments as dictated by the measure. The initiative also requires the mobile home park owner proposing to close or change the use of a park to pay the tenants displaced by the closure or change of use for reasonable costs of relocation as defined in the Initiative. The California Department of Housing and Community Development issues building permits routinely for work on existing mobile homes and for the installation of new mobile homes in mobile home parks, generally replacing previous mobile homes.

Residential Care Facilities
The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Sections 5115 and 5116) of the California Welfare and Institutions Code declares that mentally and physically disabled persons are entitled to live in normal residential surroundings.

The City’s Zoning Code contains provisions for two types of residential care facilities: large and small.

Section 9-4.202 defines “residential care facilities, large” as “State-licensed facilities that provide 24- City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 57
hour-a-day, non-medical care and supervision for seven or more physically, mentally and/or developmentally disabled persons in need of assistance essential for sustaining the basic activities of daily living, such as bathing, dressing, eating, transferring and toileting.” The zoning regulations define “residential care facilities, small” as “State-licensed residential facilities that are required by law to be treated as residential uses for zoning purposes, including the following facilities serving six or fewer persons:
(1) Residential care facilities for the elderly as set forth in Health and Safety Code Sec. 1569.85; (2) Residential facilities (family homes, group care facilities for 24-hour-a-day non-medical care of persons in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual) as set forth in Health and Safety Code Sec. 1502 (a) (1) and 1566.3;
(3) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities as set forth in Health and Safety Code Sec. 11834.02 and 11834.23;
(4) Residential care facilities for persons with chronic life-threatening illnesses as set forth in Health and Safety Code Sec. 1568.0831;
(5) Intermediate care facilities for the developmentally disabled habilitative, intermediate care facility/developmentally disabled-nursing and congregate health living facilities as set forth in Health and Safety Code Sec. 1267.8, 1267.9 and 1267.16; (6) Pediatric day health and respite care facilities as set forth in Health and Safety Code Sec. 1760.2 and 1760.4;
(7) Family care homes, foster homes and group homes providing care on a 24 hour basis for mentally disordered or otherwise handicapped persons or dependent and neglected children as set forth in Welfare & Institutions Code Sec. 5115 and 5116.” Pursuant to State law, small residential care facilities must be considered a residential use to be permitted in all residential zones and cannot be subject to stricter zoning or building and safety standards than are required of the other permitted residential uses in the zone. Consistent with State requirements, the Zoning Code permits small residential care facilities (for six or fewer persons) by right in all residential zones, subject to the same permits, permit processing procedures, fees, and development standards as all other one-family, two-family, and multiple-family dwellings in their respective zones.

Large residential care facilities (for seven or more persons) are allowed with Planning Commission approval of a Special Use Permit in the R-E, HPD, HPD-SFD, C-O, and P-L zones. In the R-E zone, a minimum subzone of five acres is required, or a minimum parcel size of five acres is required for large residential care facilities; in the HPD and HPD-SFD zones, a minimum parcel size of five acres is required. New applications for large residential care facilities cannot be located within 500 feet of another existing or entitled large residential care facility to avoid the potential for neighborhood overconcentration.

Emergency Shelters and Low Barrier Navigation Centers
The Zoning Code defines “emergency shelter” as “housing with minimal supportive services for homeless persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less by a homeless person.” Adopted in 2007, SB 2 requires that local jurisdictions estimate the number of persons in need of emergency shelter and determine whether adequate capacity currently exists to serve this need. If there is City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 58
insufficient capacity, cities are required to identify at least one zone where emergency shelters are permitted by right. The identified zoning district must have adequate capacity available to accommodate at least one year-round shelter. Local jurisdictions may, however, establish standards to regulate the development of emergency shelters. The City allows emergency shelters in the C-2, M1, M-2, and P-L zones with Planning Commission approval of a SUP, and allowed by right within the Rancho Conejo Industrial Park Specific Plan (SP -No. 15) planning area pursuant to Ordinance 1547- NS. The Rancho Conejo Industrial Park Specific Plan (SP- 15) consists of approximately 349 acres which allows industrial and office development. As of December 2021, the industrial space vacancy rate was 3.9 percent and office vacancy rate was 30.5 percent (approximately 298,900 square feet).

There are two vacant parcels on 5.45 acres and underutilized standalone parking parcels, which could allow for development of an emergency shelter. While estimates vary depending on the source, the City’s homeless population is considered to be 300 persons (2020 PIT count was 152 and TO Police Department count was 242 the same year).

However, AB 2339 passed in 2022 requires that the zone(s) designated for by-right emergency shelters must also permit residential uses. The Rancho Conejo Industrial Park Specific Plan does not meet this new requirement. The City will amend the Zoning Code to allow emergency shelter as a permitted use by right without discretionary review in its new Mixed Use designation/zone where new housing is anticipated. For an estimated homeless population of 300, a total site area of 60,000 square feet is needed based on the general guidance of AB 2339 at 200 square feet of site area per person. Overall, 462 parcels in the City are to be designated Mixed Use under the proposed General Plan. Among these, 41 parcels are developed as condominium housing. The sites inventory identified another 95 parcels for potential redevelopment of new housing or mixed use projects. These leave about 326 parcels that are not used for the RHNA sites inventory or developed with condominium housing, and can potentially be available for new development or adaptive reuse as emergency shelters. Among these 326 parcels, 178 are smaller than 0.5 acre that may be more financially feasible for small shelters. The majority of these 178 small parcels are developed as lower intensity retail/commercial uses. Median year built was 1971 (buildings over 50 years old) and median improvement to land value ratio is 0.72. These properties offer adequate potential capacity for emergency shelters to accommodate the unsheltered homeless in the community.

Section 9-4.2525 of the Zoning Code includes specific standards for the development and operation of emergency shelters related to parking, minimum spacing, shelter management and security, and facilities provided. AB 139 (2019) limits the standards that may be imposed on emergency shelters by local jurisdictions. The Zoning Code provisions are generally consistent with AB 139, except that AB 139 limits parking requirements to that which is sufficient to accommodate all shelter staff, provided that the standards do not require more parking that other uses in the same zone. The City’s provisions currently require one parking space per staff person during the largest shift, plus 0.2 space for each resident and therefore are not in compliance with the State requirements.

AB 101 (2019) introduced a definition for “Low Barrier Navigation Centers” and requires cities to permit them by right in areas zoned for mixed uses and nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses, if the facility meets specified requirements. AB 101 defines a Low Barrier Navigation Center as “a Housing First, low-barrier, service-enriched shelter focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides temporary living facilities while case managers connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter, and housing.” Low Barrier shelters may include options such as allowing pets, permitting partners to share living space, and providing storage for residents’ possessions. AB 101 also sets a timeline for jurisdictions to act on applications City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 59
for Low Barrier Navigation Center developments. The requirements of this bill are effective through the end of 2026, at which point they are repealed.

While the current Thousand Oaks Zoning Code does not have any mixed-use zones and does not allow for multi-family residential development in non-residential zones, future zones adopted to implement the General Plan 2045 land use designations will incorporate such uses. Additionally, some specific plans (SP No. 20, for example) allow for mixed-use development. Therefore, the City will need to include provisions for Low Barrier Navigation Centers in the Zoning Code.

As discussed above, several amendments are needed to ensure the Zoning Code is compliant with State law related to emergency shelters and low barrier navigation centers. Therefore, a program to amend the Zoning Code to ensure compliance with the emergency shelter requirements of AB-2339, SB 2 and AB 139 and the requirements of AB 101 related to low barrier navigation centers has been included in the Housing Programs of this Housing Element (Program 7).

Transitional and Supportive Housing
State law (AB 2634 and SB 2) requires local jurisdictions to address the provisions for transitional and supportive housing. Under Housing Element law, transitional housing means buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculating of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six months from the beginning of the assistance (California Government Code Section 65582(h)).

Supportive housing means housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to an onsite or offsite service that assists the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. Target population means persons with low incomes who have one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health condition, or individuals eligible for services provided pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 4500) of the Welfare and Institutions Code) and may include, among other populations, adults, emancipated minors, families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional settings, veterans, and homeless people (California Government Code Sections 65582(f) and (g)).

Accordingly, State law establishes transitional and supportive housing as a residential use and therefore local governments cannot treat it differently from other similar types of residential uses (e.g., requiring a use permit when other residential uses of similar function do not require a use permit).

Consistent with State Law, the Thousand Oaks Zoning Code defines “transitional housing” as “rental housing operated under program requirements that call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months.” Supportive housing is defined in the Zoning Regulations as “housing as defined in Sec. 65582 of the California Governmental Code.” City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 60
Per the Section 9-4.2527 of the Zoning Code, transitional and supportive housing is considered a residential use of property allowed in all residential zones, subject only to the restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone.

AB 2162 (2018) placed new limitations on how local jurisdictions can regulate supportive housing developments. In order to remove barriers to the development of supportive housing, AB 2162 requires supportive housing projects containing 50 or fewer units (for cities with populations less than 200,000) to be permitted by right in zones where multi-family and mixed-use development are permitted, provided the project meets certain criteria. Additionally, a city may not place parking requirements on a supportive housing project located within one half mile of a public transit stop.

The Housing Programs of this Housing Element include an amendment to the Zoning Code to address these new requirements for supportive housing developments (Program 7).

Single Room Occupancy Housing
The Zoning Regulations define “single room occupancy housing” as “an apartment house within which the eating, sleeping and living areas for each dwelling unit are all situated within one room.” Per Section 9-4.2104 of the City’s Zoning Regulations, single room occupancy (SRO) housing is an allowable multiple-family dwelling use and subject to the same requirements as all multiple-family types, including apartments, condominiums, and townhomes subject to the same permits and permit processing procedures.

Farmworker and Employee Housing
The California Employee Housing Act requires that housing for six or fewer employees be treated as a regular residential use. The Employee Housing Act further defines housing for agricultural workers consisting of 36 beds or 12 units be treated as an agricultural use and permitted where agricultural uses are permitted.

Housing for farmworkers is permitted within both residential and commercial zones allowing for commercial agriculture uses. In the RA and RE zones, “farm cottages” are permitted with a PPD, and defined as single-family one-story dwellings that are leased to and occupied by persons employed and working exclusively on the farm premises or premises under the same ownership and their dependents.

Farm cottages are limited to one per 10 acres of land, with a maximum of two farm cottages on any one parcel. Dwellings for agricultural workers are also permitted by right in the C-3, C-4, and M-1 zones on the same parcel as the agricultural use. The Zoning Code does not contain any other requirements for this type of housing.

Currently, the City’s Zoning Code does not comply with the Employee Housing Act. Employee housing for six or fewer persons is defined as a residential use. The City will assess its compliance with the State Employee Housing Act and amend the Zoning Code as necessary to comply with State law as part of the Housing Programs (Program 7).

Density Bonus Ordinance
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 61
California Government Code Section 65915 requires that a local government shall grant a density bonus and other incentives or concessions to developers of housing projects which include an affordable housing component. Article 5 of the Zoning Code contains the City’s density bonus provisions, which were initially adopted in 2008 and most recently updated in 2016. However, state density bonus requirements have changed significantly since that time. Most recently, AB 2345 (2020) increased the maximum density bonus for projects containing some portion of affordable units from 35 percent to 50 percent. Additionally, AB 1763 (2019) created new regulations for projects that contain 100 percent affordable units, including:
• Up to 20 percent of the units may be affordable to moderate income households • Qualifying projects must be allowed four incentives or concessions • For projects located within one half mile of a major transit stop, a height increase of up to three additional stories or 35 feet is permitted
• A density bonus of up to 80 percent is required; however, there is no limitation on density for qualifying projects within one half mile of a major transit stop.

In addition to a density bonus, developers may also be eligible for one or more concessions or incentives for a qualified project. These may include:
• Reductions in site development standards and modifications of zoning and architectural design requirements, including reduced setbacks and parking standards; • Mixed used zoning that will reduce the cost of the housing, if the non-residential uses are compatible with the housing development and other development in the area; and • Other regulatory incentives or concessions that result in "identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions."
As noted above, the City’s density bonus ordinance was most recently updated in 2016, prior to the State’s enactment of AB 1763 and AB 2345. Therefore, amendments to update the density bonus ordinance to comply with State law have been included as part of the Housing Programs (Program 7).

Incentives for Small and Underutilized Parcels
In March 2012, the City added incentives for small and underutilized parcels to the Zoning Code with the express purpose of encouraging the production of affordable housing. Proposed housing developments that meet the following criteria are eligible for an incentive:
• The proposed development will be built on a site that is: An existing parcel that is less than 1/2 acre in size, including an existing parcel of less than 1/2 acre that is developed in combination with one or more contiguous parcels; or,
• A parcel listed in the inventory of underutilized sites with redevelopment potential in the Housing Element of the Thousand Oaks General Plan;
• All of the housing, with the exception of a managers unit (if any), shall be provided to extremely low, very low or low income households at affordable rents or affordable housing costs;
• All of the housing shall be multiple-family housing developed at a minimum density of 20 dwellings per net acre;
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 62
• The development density shall comply with any law, including Government Code 65863, that restricts the City from allowing a parcel to be developed at a lower density than needed to accommodate the City’s share of the regional housing need; and, • The project shall be subject to a recorded agreement between the City and a housing developer specifying the income level of the occupants and guaranteeing the affordability of the units.

If a project meets the requirements listed above, the developer is eligible to receive two incentives set forth in the density bonus program. However, these two incentives are in addition to any incentive that may be granted under the density program. This incentive program potentially provides an effective tool in the development of small and underutilized parcels in the City.

Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan
The City adopted the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan (SP 20) in November 2011, covering 345 acres in the core of the community and encompassing sites designated for high density residential, medium density residential, commercial, industrial, and recreation/open space uses (Table 36Table 36). The Specific Plan was most recently amended in 2016. The area subject to the Specific Plan generally follows the boundaries of the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Business Improvement District and extends along Thousand Oaks Boulevard roughly from Conejo Boulevard/Moorpark Road in the west to Duesenburg Drive in the east.

Table 36: Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan Area - Zoning Zone(s) Gross Acres Percent
Commercial (C-2/CC) 267 77%
Other Commercial (C-1, C-3) 31 9%
Residential (RPD-30, RPD-25, RPD-15, RPD-6.3U-SFD, R-2, R-E) 16 5% Public, Quasi-public, Institutional Lands and Facilities (P-L) 4 1% Industrial (M-1, M-2) 26 8%
Open Space 1 --
Total 345 100%
Source: City of Thousand Oaks, Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan, November 2011 Residential capacity within the Specific Plan area was initially granted a total of 289 residential units in order to comply with Measure E. At the time of adoption, 75 dwelling units existed within the planning area, leaving capacity for an additional 214 units distributed proportionately among three districts. In 2013, the Specific Plan was allotted an additional 206 units from the General Plan residential capacity that could be used anywhere within the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan requires that at least 50 percent of new dwelling units be constructed in vertical mixed-use projects fronting on Thousand Oaks Boulevard. The purpose of these requirements is to distribute residential development generally along the entire Specific Plan corridor, and to encourage mixed-use development facing Thousand Oaks Boulevard. As part of the General Plan update, the redistribution of land uses throughout the City will comply with Measure E residential capacity and allow residential development consistent with the proposed land use designations.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 63
For multiple-family residential units including apartments and condominiums, the following parking requirements apply:
• Studios: 1.0 space per unit
• One-bedroom units: 1.25 spaces per unit
• Two or more units: 1.75 spaces per unit
Additionally, shared parking agreements may be developed if two or more land uses or businesses have distinctly different hours of operation or hours that do not substantially coincide or overlay with each other (e.g., theater vs. office), including mixed-use developments where residential and commercial/office parking demand often occurs at different times of the day.

The Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan also includes an incentives program to facilitate lot consolidation and construction of multiple-family residential units affordable to lower income households.

6. Building Codes and Enforcement
Building and safety codes are adopted to preserve public health and safety, and ensure the construction of safe and decent housing. These codes and standards also have the potential to increase the cost of housing construction or maintenance. The City of Thousand Oaks has adopted and enforces the 2019 California Building Code (CBC). State law allows jurisdictions to adopt local amendments to the CBC only if they are necessitated by local geographic, climatic, or topographic conditions. The City of Thousand Oaks has adopted one such notable amendment, which increased the roof covering material requirements from Class B to Class A in order to provide greater fire-resistant protection. While this requirement does have a minor impact on construction costs, it is necessary to reduce fire risk due to local climatic and topographic conditions.

The Building Division of the Department of Community Development is responsible for the enforcement of Building Codes in the City. The Building Division provides plan-check and inspection services. Building Code enforcement is conducted through scheduled inspections of new construction, remodeling and rehabilitation projects, and upon re-sale or transfer of ownership of residential property. Inspections are also conducted in response to public complaints or an inspector's observation that construction is occurring without proper permits.

7. Housing for Persons with Disabilities
California Government Code Section 65583(a)(6) requires the analysis of potential and actual constraints upon the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing for persons with disabilities and demonstration of efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the City from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities.

Land Use Controls
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 64
The City of Thousand Oaks Zoning Code contains specific provisions for both residential care facilities and supportive housing, which are common housing types suitable to meet the needs of persons with disabilities. As previously discussed, the City permits small residential care facilities (for six or fewer persons) by right in all the residential zones. Large facilities serving seven or more persons are permitted with SUP approval in the R-E, HPD, HPD-SFD, C-O, and P-L zones. Per the Zoning Code, supportive housing is treated as a residential use and is subject only to the same standards as other residential uses in the same zone.

Reasonable Accommodation
Building and development standards may constrain the ability of persons with disabilities to live in housing units that are suited to their needs. Applying the principle of reasonable accommodation, the City understands its affirmative duty to be flexible in the application of land use and zoning regulations, rules, and procedures for equal access to housing for people with disabilities.

The City adopted a formal reasonable accommodation ordinance in January 2011. Zoning Code Section 9-4.2526 provides the procedure for allowing reasonable accommodations in the application of land use, zoning and building regulations, including policies and procedures for persons with disabilities seeking equal access to housing under the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.

A request for reasonable accommodation may be made of the City by any person with a disability or a developer of housing for people with disabilities, when the application of a land use, zoning or building regulation, policy or practice acts as a barrier to fair housing opportunities. Requests for reasonable accommodation are reviewed by the Community Development Director if no approval is sought other than the reasonable accommodation. Requests for reasonable accommodation submitted for concurrent review with another discretionary application are reviewed by the authority reviewing the other discretionary application.

The written decision to grant a request for reasonable accommodation shall be based on consideration of the following findings:
• That the housing which is the subject of the request will be used by a person with disabilities; • That the request is necessary to make the housing which is the subject of the request available to a person with a disability;
• That the request would not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the City; • That the request would not require a fundamental alteration in the nature of a City program or law, including but not limited to land use and zoning; and, • That there is no alternative reasonable accommodation that would be less at variance with City standards.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 65
In granting a request for reasonable accommodation, the reviewing authority may impose any conditions of approval deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the reasonable accommodation complies with the required findings. Finally, a determination to grant or deny a request for reasonable accommodation by the Community Development Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission and a determination by the Planning Commission may be appealed to City Council.

Definition of Family
Local governments may unlawfully restrict access to housing for households failing to qualify as a “family” by the definition specified in their respective Zoning Code. Specifically, a restrictive definition of “family” that limits the number of persons and differentiates between related and unrelated individuals living together may illegally limit the development and siting of group homes for persons with disabilities but not for families that are similarly sized or situated.

The City’s Zoning Code defines “family” as one or more persons living together as a single housekeeping unit. This definition of “family” is not restrictive to the occupancy of a housing unit and is, therefore, not a constraint because it does not limit the number of or differentiate between related and unrelated individuals occupying a dwelling unit.

Building Code
As previously indicated, the City of Thousand Oaks has adopted the 2019 California Building Code and routinely adopts updates as they become available. The City has not adopted any special amendments to this Code that would impede housing for persons with disabilities. The City’s building codes require that new residential construction comply with the federal American with Disabilities Act (ADA). ADA provisions include requirements for a minimum percentage of units in new developments to be fully accessible to the physically disabled. Current building codes require that all ground floor multi-family units be handicapped-accessible, as well as elevator-served buildings.

Compliance with building codes and the ADA may increase the cost of housing production and can also impact the viability of rehabilitation of older properties required to be brought up to current code standards. However, these regulations provide minimum standards that must be complied with in order to ensure the development of safe and accessible housing.

In conclusion, the City has not imposed unique or unusual restrictions on housing for the disabled, such as minimum distances between housing for persons with disabilities or other regulations that could constrain the development or retrofitting of housing for disabled persons. The City allows residential retrofitting to increase the suitability of homes for persons with disabilities in compliance with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the state’s ADA equivalent— Chapter 11B, “Accessibility,” of the 2019 California Building Code. The City works with applicants who need special accommodations in their homes. The City encourages and facilitates the construction of transitional and supportive housing by allowing such projects as residential land uses subject to the same permits and permit processing procedures applicable to one-family, two-family, and multiple-family dwellings in their respective zones. Therefore, the City’s Building and Zoning Codes, processes and procedures, and code enforcement activities are not constraints to the development, maintenance or preservation of housing for persons with disabilities.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 66

8. Planning and Development Fees
Housing construction imposes certain short- and long-term costs upon local government, such as the cost of providing planning services and inspections and the cost of added burden on local infrastructure. As a result, the City of Thousand Oaks relies upon various planning and development fees to recoup costs and ensure that essential services and infrastructure are available when needed.

Planning Fees
State law limits fees charged for development permit processing to the reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged. Application processing fees are charged to defray the costs of reviewing and processing development proposals, reviewing plans, and conducting inspections.

This includes the costs of staff time, use of vehicles, publishing public notices, mailing notices, preparing and printing reports. Many processing fees requiring a public hearing are set to cover the full costs of processing, including personnel, materials and overhead costs but others such as, singlefamily residential permits (PPD), ADUs, administrative development permits and special use permits and modifications to these permits are set fees which typically result in City subsidized permit costs.

Planning fees for Thousand Oaks are summarized in Table 37Table 37. The City’s fee schedule undergoes review and update every two fiscal years and the current fee schedule went into effect on July 1, 2021. Due to limited resources, the City does not typically offer fee waivers; however, the City Council may approve a waiver, offer deferred or reduced fees, or supplement fees for affordable housing projects.

Table 38Table 38 provides a summary of permit processing fees, including planning, building, and public works fees for various housing project types. As shown in the table, per unit fees are typically the highest for larger single-family residences. The per unit fees for multi-family developments, including townhomes, condominiums, and apartment buildings, are significantly lower than for singlefamily residences.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 67
Table 37: Thousand Oaks Planning & Environmental Fees
Fee Type Fee Amount
Accessory Dwelling Unit $200
General Plan Amendment $10,000 (deposit)1
Municipal Code Amendment $4,000 (deposit) 1
Zone Change $10,500 (deposit) 1
Land Division
Tentative Parcel Map
Tentative Tract Map
$4,500 (admin. review) / $6,000 (deposit1, PC review)
$15,000 (deposit) 1
Precise Plan of Design (PPD)
New Custom Home
Alter Existing Home
$2,590 (admin. review) / $3,250 (PC review)
$610 (admin. review) / $1,600 (PC review)
Residential/Hillside/Trailer Planned Development $20,000 (deposit) 1, 3 Special Use Permit
Type A (PC Review)
Type B (PC Review – no new site or substantial mods)
Type C (Admin. Review)
$20,000 (deposit) 1
$8,935
$1,185
Specific Plan/Specific Plan Amendment $20,000 (deposit) 1 Environmental Documents
ND/MND processed by staff $4,000 (deposit) 1
EIR/ND/MND processed by consultant TBD2
Notes:

1. Project is billed on a time and material basis and deposit is collected in advance to cover these costs. Should the deposit be exceeded, payment of new charges will be invoiced to the applicant. Unused portions of deposits are refunded to the applicant.

2. For environmental document consultant deposits, the City will collect a deposit based on the estimated cost of the consultant to complete the project plus an additional 20% for City overhead (staff review and administration).

3. If processed with TTM or TPM, fee is 40% of TTM or TPM total cost.

Source: City of Thousand Oaks, Planning Division Filing Fee Summary, July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2023.

Table 38: Typical Permit Processing Fees per Unit for Various Housing Types Service SFR, Large Lot1 SFR, Small Lot2 Townhome3 Condominium4 Apartment5 Grading $1,500 $1,500 $1,570 $300 $262
On-site Improvements $1,000 $1,000 $770 $770 $770
Off-site Encroachment $480 $320 $529 $232 $232
Building Permit $4,660 $2,728 $1,014 $556 $437
Building Plan Check $3,960 $3,210 $1,193 $654 $514
Planning Entitlement $2,590 $2,400 $2,400 $960 $600
Subdivision Map $1,100 $1,500 $1,200 $600 $0
Total per Unit $15,290 $12,658 $8,676 $4,072 $2,815
Notes:

1. The large lot single-family prototype consists of 10,000 square-foot lots and 3,700 square-foot homes with three-car garages.

4. The small lot-single-family prototype involves 5,000 square-foot lots and 2,200 square-foot homes with two-car garages.

5. The prototypical townhome development consists of 8 units at 1,800 SF each.

6. The prototypical condominium development consists of 25 units at 1,200 SF each.

7. The prototypical apartment development consists of 40 units at 900 SF each.

Source: City of Thousand Oaks, July 2021
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 68
Development Impact Fees
Until 1978, property taxes were the primary revenue source for financing the construction of infrastructure and improvements required to support new residential development. The passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 has limited a local jurisdiction’s ability to raise property taxes and significantly lowered the ad valorem tax rate, increasing reliance on other funding sources to provide infrastructure, public improvements, and public services. An alternative funding source widely used among local governments in California is the development impact fee, which is collected for a variety of improvements including water and sewer facilities, parks, and transportation improvements.

To enact an impact fee, State law requires that the local jurisdiction demonstrate the “nexus” between the type of development in question and the impact being mitigated by the proposed fee. Also, the amount of the fee must be roughly proportional to the impact caused by the development.

Nevertheless, development impact fees today have become a significant cost factor in housing development.

Development in the City of Thousand Oaks is subject to development impact fees related to a variety of public facilities and infrastructure. Almost all of these fees are assessed through a pro rata share system, based on the magnitude of the project’s impact or on the extent of the benefit that will be derived. These fees, which are assessed by the City and other public agencies, include:
• Water fees (assessed by Calleguas Municipal Water District) • Wastewater fees (assessed by Triunfo Water & Sanitation District) • Traffic mitigation fees
• Park (Quimby) fees
• School fees (assessed by Conejo Valley Unified School District) • Fire Protection Facilities Fee (assessed by Ventura County Fire Protection District) • Police Fees (assessed by County of Ventura Sheriff’s Department) • Watershed Protection District Fee (assessed by Ventura County Watershed Protection District)
• Ventura County Reciprocal Traffic Fee (assessed by Ventura County) Table 39Table 39 provides estimates for the total processing and development impact fees on a per unit basis for five prototype housing projects. As previously noted in regards to processing and permit fees, the per unit fees decreases for multi-family residential projects, particularly for larger projects.

The per unit fee for a 40-unit apartment project is just over half the per unit fee for a large lot singlefamily home.

Although development fees and improvement requirements increase the cost of housing, cities have little choice in establishing such requirements to pay for the impact of new development on public facilities.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 69
Table 39: Total Processing and Development Impact Fees for Typical Residential Developments Type of Unit Total Fees Per Unit
Single-family, Large Lot1 $67,176
Single-family, Small Lot2 $59,204
Townhomes3 $56,747
Condominiums4 $43,890
Apartments5 $35,500
Notes:

1. The large lot single-family prototype consists of 10,000 square-foot lots and 3,700 square-foot homes with three-car garages.

2. The small lot-single-family prototype involves 5,000 square-foot lots and 2,200 square-foot homes with two-car garages.

3. The prototypical townhome development consists of 8 units at 1,800 SF each.

4. The prototypical condominium development consists of 25 Units at 1,200 SF each.

5. The prototypical apartment development consists of 40 units at 900 SF each.

Source: City of Thousand Oaks, 2021.

9. Local Processing and Permit Procedures
In addition to the associated permit fees, the development review process can affect housing costs due to the time it takes for review to be completed. Due to interest rates, inflation, and other factors, the longer it takes for a development proposal to be approved, the higher the development costs.

Development application processing has basic time requirements as a result of the City's obligation to evaluate projects adequately, as well as the requirements of state law, including the Subdivision Map Act, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Permit Streamlining Act.

Residential Permit Processing
Communities can encourage needed reinvestment in the housing stock by reducing the time and uncertainty involved in obtaining development permits. Pursuant to the State Permit Streamlining Act, governmental delays are recommended to be reduced by: (1) limiting processing time in most cases to one year; and (2) by requiring agencies to specify the information needed to complete an acceptable application
State Planning and Zoning Law provides permit processing requirements for residential development.

Within the framework of state law, the City has structured its development review process to minimize review time while ensuring that projects receive careful consideration and due process. Residential projects are subject to a range of review procedures, depending on the nature of the development.

Table 40Table 40 summarizes the decision-making authority and approximate timeline for various permits and entitlements. Processing time and cost is greatly affected by the size and complexity of the project and the physical characteristics of the property. Much of the remaining developable land has one or more physical constraints, such as steep terrain and protected oak and landmark trees. This complicates the review process, however slope studies and protected tree reports are often necessary to evaluate proposed developments. As shown in Table 40Table 40, processing times for most cases are consistent with State recommendations of taking up to one year. In addition, the City provides early consultation to reduce processing times and avoid delays.

Early consultation with City staff is encouraged to identify issues as soon as possible and reduce processing time. A “pre-application” is encouraged so that applicants can become acquainted with City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 70
the information and fees required by each department and agency. This process is required for projects within the R-P-D zone. This allows the modification of proposed projects by applicants during the preliminary planning stages to minimize costs. To expedite the review process, the City processes all required entitlement applications simultaneously.

The City reviews all submitted applications for completeness within 30 days consistent with the State Permit Streamlining Act. Once an application is deemed complete, the typical processing timeframe varies by project complexity, required entitlements, and environmental review, as noted in Table 40Table 40.

All proposed housing development must comply with the “Architectural Design Review Guidelines for New Residential Development.” Like most nearby jurisdictions, the City uses its design review guidelines to avoid unattractive and monotonous buildings and thereby discourage blight and neighborhood deterioration. All design review is conducted concurrently with the rest of the review process. The City does not have a separate design review process or design review board, which allows design review to take place without significantly increasing the time and cost of development.

Public hearings, when required, are reasonable forums for obtaining and responding to public input on proposed housing projects and associated environmental documents. Public hearings have not posed a constraint on housing development in Thousand Oaks. They sometimes facilitate the resolution of disputes, thereby avoiding the cost, delay and uncertainty of litigation.

Table 40: Review Authority and Timeframe for Permits and Entitlements Application Approving
Authority Typical Timeframe
Precise Plan of Design Permit CDD1 6-8 weeks
Residential Planned Development Permit PC2 or CDD 16-20 weeks for PC3 12-16 weeks for CDD3
Hillside Planned Development Permit PC 16-20 weeks3
Trailer Park Development Permit PC 12-16 weeks3
Special Use Permit PC 8-12 weeks
Parcel Map CDD 8-12 weeks
Tentative Map PC 24-30 weeks
Final Map CC4 24-30 weeks
Development Agreements CC 24-30 weeks
General Plan Amendments PC and CC 12-18 months
Specific Plans and Amendments PC and CC 12-18 months
Variance PC 20-24 weeks
Zone Change PC and CC 9-12 months
Notes:

1. CDD = Community Development Director or designee

2. PC = Planning Commission

3. Varies, depending on level of CEQA review required

4. CC = City Council
Source: City of Thousand Oaks, Community Development Department, 2021 City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 71
On November 2022, the City launched the TO/24 Virtual Land Use Service—an enhanced and integrated virtual service system for property owners, residents and businesses seeking authorization from City departments for a range of activities relating to residential and commercial development and business operations. TO/24 provides customers with 24-hour online access to submit applications, seek permits and approvals, initiate and execute plan check, schedule inspections and view statuses and results, make payments, access parcel-specific historical records, and more. TO/24 upgrades the overall customer experience when seeking City approvals by streamlining processes, providing access to real-time status updates, and better preserving historical records relating to individual parcels. TO/24 also added a broad range of new online services such as:
• Adding the ability to submit Construction Permit applications, Public Works Grading, Paving and Encroachment Permit applications online.
• Allowing applicants to review status, submit plans, and make corrections, as needed. • Consolidating services currently provided through various technological programs into a single system. This consolidation reduces the need for customers to learn and access multiple technological systems.
• Improving the planning case submissions process and helps to standardize the electronic plan review as a collaborative, efficient and sustainable solution for development projects.

Services and electronic solutions offered through TO/24 will evolve to further meet customer needs in the future.

The following section provides a brief discussion of the most common permits and entitlements required for residential development in the City of Thousand Oaks.

Precise Plan of Design (PPD) Permit
A PPD permit is required for new single-family residences that do not require any other entitlement review. PPD permits are reviewed administratively by the Community Development Director or designee and can typically be processed in six to eight weeks. Pursuant to Section 9-4.1807 of the Zoning Code, the Director or designee must consider the following factors in reviewing a PPD permit:

1. The site’s dimensions with relation to the proposed structures and permitted uses;

2. The adequacy, compatibility and harmony of the exterior building design, colors, materials and architectural features with the existing environment and the adopted guidelines;

3. The location of the property in relation to surrounding property zoned for a less dense use, such as a residential use;

4. The relationship of topography and grade to finished floor elevations of the site being improved;

5. The proper orientation of the main elevation with respect to nearby streets and improvements; and

6. Any other matters relevant to implement the purpose of the PPD process.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 72
Residential Planned Development (RPD) Permit
An RPD permit is required for most multi-family development in Thousand Oaks. Generally, RPD applications for four or fewer units may be processed administratively, while larger projects require review and approval by the Planning Commission. RPD permits reviewed administratively typically take 12 to 16 weeks to process, while those reviewed by the Planning Commission typically take an additional four weeks, due to scheduling and noticing requirements. Additionally, larger projects may take longer based on the required environmental documents and associated pubic review times.

Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps
Applications for the subdivision of land are processed concurrently with other project entitlements or permits and therefore, do not tend to add significant processing time for housing developments.

Smaller projects involving four or fewer lots can be processed administratively by the Community Development Director, while projects involving more lots require Planning Commission review. The findings required to be made by the applicable approval authority are specified in the Subdivision Map Act.

Legislative Amendments
As required by California law, legislative approvals such as General Plan Amendments, Specific Plans and amendments, and Zone Changes must be reviewed at public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council. In such cases, the Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council and the City Council makes the final decision. Due to the level of complexity typical of projects seeking this type of approval, the associated environmental review, and the multiple levels of review, projects involving legislative amendments take significantly longer to process. However, legislative amendments are not typically needed or required for housing development within the City as the General Plan and Zoning Code provide ample areas where residential development can occur without such amendments.

Environmental Review
Environmental review is required for all development projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Most projects in Thousand Oaks are either Categorically Exempt or require only an Initial Study and Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration if potentially significant environmental impacts can be mitigated to a level that is less than significant.

Developments that have the potential of creating significant impacts that cannot be mitigated require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

State law also requires payment of a CEQA document filing fee to the Department of Fish and Game for filing the required Notice of Determination for a Negative Declaration (ND), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), or EIR with the County Clerk. The CEQA filing fee is waived if a project (1) will have no effect on fish and wildlife or (2) is statutorily or categorically exempt from CEQA. As of January 1, 2021, the fee was $2,480.25 for a NDs and MNDs and $3,445.25 for EIRs.11 Fees for processing NDs, MNDs, and EIRs prepared by a consultant are established on a deposit-basis. 11 https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/CEQA/Fees, 2021.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 73
Although environmental review can add to the time and cost of processing development applications, it facilitates thorough review of the potential environmental impacts of a project and provides additional opportunities for the public to provide input. Further, environmental review is mandated by State law and therefore, does not pose a unique constraint to housing development in Thousand Oaks when compared to other jurisdictions in the State.

Procedures
Under the existing Municipal Code multi-family residential development requires discretionary review of a Residential Planned Development Permit or Hillside Development Permit, which if meets the zoning requirements would be subject to an administrative approval by the Community Development Director. Permits that request Tentative Maps or do not meet certain zoning criteria are subject to Planning Commission approval.

The decision-making body may approve a development permit, as conditioned, based on the following findings (1) through (4), and may approve a special use permit, as conditioned, based on findings (1) through (5):
(1) The project is consistent with the Thousand Oaks General Plan and any applicable specific plan or redevelopment plan;
(2) The project complies with all applicable laws, regulations and policies, including the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code;
(3) The project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; (4) The project has been reviewed in conformance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act;
(5) The proposed use at the proposed location will be compatible with land uses in the vicinity.

The approvals may be processed administratively if minor modifications or other entitlements do not require Planning Commission review.

Using some recent projects as examples:
• 1710 East Thousand Oaks Blvd (APN: 6700181410; 6700181295; 6700181300; 6700181390):

A 36-unit apartment project was constructed on a 2.62-acre lot, zoned SP-20, which allows for a maximum of 30 du/ac. The 2.62 acre lot was the result of merging 17 underlying legal lots into 3 legal lots. The resulting site for the mixed-use development was the result of combining lots of the following approximate sizes: 0.273, 0.247, 0.241, 1.05 and 0.75 acres with 0.14 acres of abandoned right of way. The achieved density was 11.1 du/ac. The prior use on-site was a restaurant. Project was Categorically Exempt from CEQA. This project took nine months for entitlement processing, which includes pre-application and addressing design solutions for sewer connection around a storm drain easement that bisects the site and tree preservation.
• 299 East Thousand Oaks Blvd (APN: 6690050135): A 142-unit apartment project was constructed on a 3.17-acre lot, zoned SP-20, which allows for a maximum of 30 du/ac. The City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 74
achieved density was 44.79 du/ac and the unit mix provided included 11 very low and 131 market rate units. The prior use on-site was RV/Car Sales. This project took 18 months for entitlement processing, which included pre-application and addressing design solutions flood plain and tree preservation. The project required a Mitigated Negative Declaration under CEQA. Timeframe was impacted by the applicant team response rate to issues. • Generally, projects that are CEQA exempt would be 6-9 months for project entitlement and 12-16 months with ND or MND for CEQA review.

The City has proposed municipal code amendment to incorporate objective standards that would allow Community Director approval of projects of two units or more that either comply with the standards or have minor modifications to the Objective Standards. Projects subject to the objective standards, the municipal code amendment proposes to remove Residential Planned Development permit findings which can be considered subjective. The proposed amendment is expected to be completed by December 2022 (see Program 5).

As part of the comprehensive General Plan Update, there will be a rezoning program identified that aligns future Mixed-Use zoning with the land use designation and ensures that the development standards allow projects can achieve the maximum densities allowed under the General Plan. The updated standards and criteria facilitate and accommodate development at the density allowed the general plan on the project site and as proposed by the housing development project.

10. On/Off-Site Improvements
After the passage of Proposition 13 and its limitation on local governments’ property tax revenues, cities and counties have faced increasing difficulty in providing public services and facilities to serve their residents. One of the main consequences of Proposition 13 has been the shift in funding of new infrastructure from general tax revenues to development impact fees and improvement requirements on land developers. The City requires developers to provide on-site and off-site improvements necessary to serve their projects. Such improvements may include water, sewer and other utility extensions, street construction and traffic control device installation that are reasonably related to the project. Ultimately, however, the additional costs for residential land development and infrastructure maintenance are borne by the homeowners and their associations. Dedication of land or in-lieu fees may also be required of a project for rights-of-way, transit facilities, recreational facilities and school sites, consistent with the Subdivision Map Act.

As a condition of the approval of a subdivision map, landowners must dedicate land needed for streets or alleys, bicycle paths, local transit facilities, drainage, water, wastewater, common areas, open space areas, public service and utility easements, and other public easements. In addition, the owner must improve or agree to improve all streets, drainage, common area landscape, water, wastewater, public service and utility easements and other public easements and facilities. Owners are also responsible for development impact fees as previously discussed.

11. Inclusionary Housing Program
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 75
Inclusionary housing describes a local government requirement that a specified percentage of new housing units be reserved for, and affordable to, lower and moderate income households. The goal of inclusionary housing programs is to increase the supply of affordable housing commensurate with new market-rate development in a jurisdiction. This can result in improved regional jobs-housing balances and foster greater economic and racial integration within a community. The policy is most effective in areas experiencing a strong demand for housing.

The City initially adopted an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance in 2008 to provide a mechanism for producing housing affordable to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households. New residential developments offering a for-sale product must provide at least 10 percent of all proposed dwelling units as inclusionary units offered for sale at affordable ownership cost to moderate income households or for rent at a rent affordable to extremely low, very low, or low income households.

Additionally, developers can satisfy the inclusionary housing requirement by paying a fee, in-lieu of constructing inclusionary units. The dwelling unit fee is charged against each market rate unit in a project. Collected in-lieu fees are deposited in the City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund.

The following residential developments are exempt from the Inclusionary Housing requirements:
(a) A residential development of five or fewer dwelling units. (b) A residential development or that portion of a residential development where the dwelling units are offered for rent and the dwelling units cannot be sold individually. (c) The reconstruction of any dwelling units that has been destroyed by fire, flood, earthquake or other act of nature provided that the reconstruction of the project does not result in an increase in the number of existing units by six or more.

The City is currently in the preliminary phases of updating the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and anticipates releasing a request for proposals to obtain professional services to facilitate the review and analysis in early 2022. The City’s Housing Plan includes a program to complete the update to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and linkage fee program by beginning of 2023 (Program 6).

12. Nonresidential Development Linkage Fee Program
The City’s nonresidential development linkage fee program provides a mechanism for producing housing affordable to extremely low, very-low, lower and moderate income households by requiring applicable non-residential development pay a fee to be used for the production, preservation, or rehabilitation of affordable housing units. New nonresidential projects, additions, intensification of use, and conversion from residential use to a nonresidential use are subject to the linkage fee.

Collected linkage fees are deposited in the City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund.

The City also anticipates analyzing and updating the Linkage Fee Program simultaneously with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as noted above.

II. ENVIRONMENTAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE

CONSTRAINTS
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 76
Environmental hazards including seismic hazards, flooding, fire hazards and noise may impact future development of residential units in the City. Similarly, the cost to provide and maintain civil infrastructure such as water and wastewater needed to serve existing and future residential development may impact the cost and availability of housing in Thousand Oaks. These factors are discussed in further detail in this section.

1. Seismic Hazards
The principal active faults in the region, the San Andreas fault, San Gabriel fault, and 10 other less prominent faults have been responsible for several moderate to large historic earthquakes and are associated with well-defined zones of active seismicity. These faults traverse Ventura County, and many areas therein, including residential areas, are susceptible to seismic hazards including strong ground shaking, liquefaction, and earthquake-induced landslides.

The California Building Code (CBC) contains provisions to mitigate potential impacts from ground shaking, and other earthquake induced hazards. These include requiring site specific geologic and engineering investigations for proposed developments when deemed necessary by the City Engineer or when required through the CEQA process. Further, the Safety Element of the General Plan includes additional policies intended to mitigate the risk of loss of life, injury, and damage to property from seismic activity.

2. Flooding
Portions of the City, including land designated for residential uses, are susceptible to periodic creek flooding and potential inundation in the event one of the five dams in the area fails. Flood hazard areas of the City have been delineated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Flood Insurance Program. The Newbury Park, Arroyo Conejo and Conejo Mountain Creek Areas are subject to periodic inundation from flooding which can result in destruction of property, loss of life, health and safety hazards, and disruption of commerce and governmental services. Encroachment onto floodplains by artificial fills and structures reduces the capacity of the floodplain and increases the height of floodwater upstream of the obstructions. Furthermore, dam inundation areas due to potential failure of Lake Sherwood Dam, Westlake Reservoir Dam, or Lake Eleanor Dam could have significant inundation impact on the Westlake area of Thousand Oaks.

The Safety Element includes policies to reduce the impact of flooding in the City, including Policy C6: “Locate structures and additions outside of the 100-year floodplain unless such facilities area necessary to serve existing uses and construction of these structures will not increase the hazard to life or property within or adjacent to the floodplain. Location within the floodplain shall be governed by Title 4, Chapter 7 of the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code and shall require certification by a registered professional demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any increase in flood levees during the occurrence of a 100-year flood.”

3. Fire
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 77
Fire poses a threat to property and lives in City of Thousand Oaks from multiple sources, including wildland, structural, vehicle, refuse, and human-generated incidents. The extent of threat posed by wildland fires is a function of vegetation, climate, and people. Native plant communities providing major sources of fire fuel include the coastal sage scrub and chaparral that cover natural hillside areas in and around Thousand Oaks. These plant communities have evolved to incorporate burning into their ecological cycle. Mediterranean climate characterized by hot dry summers and hot dry winds in the fall turn this vegetation into a combustible threat. These fuel sources are most commonly ignited by humans, either directly through careless action or arson, or indirectly through accidents.

The Ventura County Fire Protection District (VCFPD) serves the Thousand Oaks Planning Area.

The Fire Protection District operates multiple programs to minimize the potential for hazards, including fire safety and fire prevention training, site inspections, and urban/wildland interface hazard mitigation programs. VCFPD also provides review of development permit applications for compliance with Fire Codes.

As previously discussed, Thousand Oaks has adopted a local amendment to the Building Code requiring Class A roofing materials be used to increase fire resistance. Further policies related to the mitigation of fire-related risks are found in the Safety Element.

4. Noise
Excessive noise can adversely affect human health and well-being, economic productivity, and property values, especially in areas where sensitive land uses such as senior housing, schools, child care, and hospitals are located. Mobile and stationary noise sources contribute to overall noise levels, and the impacts of both must be analyzed when considering environmental effects of new development. Potentially significant sources of noise within Thousand Oaks include vehicular traffic along arterials and freeways traversing the community and noise from retail operations such as auto repair work and commercial deliveries.

5. Water
The City is the water purveyor to approximately 36 percent of the water users within Thousand Oaks.

Other water purveyors include the California-American Water Company (Cal-Am: 48 percent), California Water Service Company (Cal Water: 16 percent), the Newbury Park Academy Mutual Water Company (less than one percent) and the Camrosa County Water District (less than one percent). The City water system consists of approximately 232 miles of transmission and distribution pipelines, 15 pump stations and 16 reservoirs with a total capacity of 35.5 million gallons. Water is delivered to the system through 11 turnouts from the Calleguas (CMWD) system. The City serves approximately 17,100 accounts and purchased approximately 10,400 acre-feet of water in 2020. The majority of the City’s water service area is residential.

The most recent Urban Water Management Plans (UWMP) prepared by the City of Thousand Oaks, Cal-Am, and Cal Water, the water purveyors servicing more than 98 percent of the City’s population, indicate adequate water supply to accommodate existing and planned future growth. Specifically, the City’s 2020 UWMP indicates adequate water supply through 2045 to accommodate projected growth.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 78

6. Wastewater
Wastewater collection and treatment are important components of protecting public and environmental health. Current wastewater treatment capacity is more than adequate to accommodate projected growth, including the City’s share of the regional housing need through 2029. The City is divided into two wastewater service areas based on topography, each with a different service provider.

The City’s Public Works Department provides wastewater treatment at the Hill Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant, which serves about 80 percent of the City’s geography and 95 percent of the City’s wastewater customers. The Hill Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant has a capacity of 14 million gallons per day (mgd) and the plant treats an average of 8 mgd.12 Sufficient capacity is available to accommodate growth through 2029 and beyond, including the City’s share of regional housing needs.

The Triunfo Water & Sanitation District serves the southeastern portion of the City and treats wastewater flows at its Tapia Treatment Plant, which is located outside the City. The Tapia Treatment plant has the capacity to treat 16 mgd. It currently treats an average of 9.5 mgd.13 III. ECONOMIC FACTORS
Non-governmental constraints are primarily market-driven and generally outside the direct control of local governments. Some impacts of non-governmental or market constraints can be offset to a minimal extent by local governmental actions, but usually the effects are very localized and have little influence on the total housing need within the jurisdiction or market area. Non-governmental constraints to affordable housing in Thousand Oaks consist of three major factors: price of land/ availability of financing, cost of construction/availability of labor, and jobs/housing balance.

The City has a limited ability to influence these factors. Land costs are impacted by the number of adequate sites that are available. Regional demand and costs have a great impact on land costs.

Construction and financing costs are also determined at the regional, state, and national levels by a variety of private and public actions, which are not controlled by the City.

The major barrier to providing housing for all economic segments of the community concerns the nature of the housing market itself. Development costs have risen to the point where building housing affordable to all economic segments of the community is difficult to achieve in California.

1. Timing and Density
12 https://www.toaks.org/departments/public-works/operations/hill-canyon-treatment-plant (accessed on September 13, 2019). 13 https://www.lvmwd.com/about-us/joint-powers-authority/wastewater-services/tapia-water-reclamation-facility (accessed on September 13, 2019).

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 79
Residential development entitlements that have been permitted within the last eight years are below the maximum density, at approximately 62 percent of the time. Typically, developers build the product types that are most profitable, essentially single-family or townhome products. Residential projects achieved the maximum density when utilizing state density bonus law. The average time lapse between approval and building permit issuance is approximately two years. Multiple factors can influence the timeline, such as ability of the project applicant in responding quickly to requests for corrections and ability to secure construction financing.

2. Construction Costs
Construction costs are primarily determined by the costs of materials and labor. Construction costs also vary dependent on the type of development and multi-family developments typically cost less per unit to construct than single family residences. According to the National Association of Home Builders 2019 Construction Cost Survey, the average cost to build a single-family home was $297,000 and made up approximately 61 percent of the home’s sale price. While this is a national survey based on data from throughout the Country, the results still illustrate the significant impact that the cost of construction can have on the final sales price of a home. Recent supply chain issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic combined with ongoing demand have further increased construction costs by greatly increasing the cost for common construction materials, such as lumber.

Although construction costs contribute significantly to the cost of housing, these factors tend to be relatively consistent throughout the region and therefore, do not pose a unique constraint to housing development within Thousand Oaks.

3. Land Costs
The cost of land in the City represents an ever-increasing proportion of the total housing development cost. In October 2019, Realtor.com listed nine undeveloped single-family residential lots for sale with lot sizes ranging from 0.2 acre to 20.0 acres (median 2.3 acres) and asking prices ranging from $185,000 to $3,350,000 (average $891,000 per acre). No undeveloped multiple-family lots were listed for sale on-line in October 2019. With less undeveloped land available in the City, new development must take place on infill and underutilized sites. In some cases, this further adds to the cost of development as existing structures must be demolished and/or rehabilitated as part of the project. Additionally, much of the undeveloped land remaining in the City is in areas of challenging topography which limits development and adds to the cost of necessary on-site improvements.

4. Availability of Home Financing
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 80
The availability of financing can affect a person’s ability to purchase or improve a home and therefore, influence the demand and improvement of ownership housing. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), lending institutions are required to disclose information on the disposition of loan applications by the income, gender and race of the applicants. This applies to all loan applications for home purchases, improvements and refinancing, whether financed at market rate or with federal government assistance. Locally assisted mortgages (such as first-time homebuyer programs) are not subject to HMDA reporting.

Table 41Table 41 summarizes the disposition of loan applications submitted to financial institutions for home purchase, home refinance and home improvement loans within Ventura County in 2017.

In 2017, there were a total of 7,810 loan applications in the County, with 56 percent being applications for refinance and 34 percent for conventional purchase loans. Overall, 65 percent of applications were approved. The approval rating for government backed purchase loans was the highest at 81 percent, followed by conventional purchase loans at 74 percent. The overall denial rate for home loan applications in Ventura County was 14 percent. The denial rate for home improvement loans was the highest at 20 percent.

Table 41: Mortgage Application Approval Rates (2017)
Loan Type Total Applications Approved Denied Incomplete or Withdrawn
Conventional 2,629 34% 74% 10% 16%
Government Backed 301 4% 81% 7% 13%
Home Improvement 489 6% 61% 20% 20%
Refinancing 4,391 56% 60% 16% 24%
Total 7,810 100% 65% 14% 21%
Source: Lendingpatterns.com, 2020.

It is generally recognized now that a major cause of the housing crisis was the significant relaxation of underwriting criteria on home mortgages, leading many households to purchase homes that they could not afford over the long term. Any reduction in household income due to lay-offs or reduced hours precipitated loan defaults. In the years since the Great Recession, lending practices and regulations have become more stringent, which may prevent some applicants from receiving a loan; however, these regulations are necessary to prevent foreclosures.

The necessary down payment to obtain a mortgage is also a significant factor in the ability to purchase a home, particularly for first time homebuyers. Even though an applicant may have the necessary income to otherwise qualify for a loan, the need to provide a 10 to 20 percent down payment may prevent many households from purchasing a home in the City’s high priced housing market.

5. Foreclosures
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 81
Foreclosure activities have been limited in the City in recent years. According to SCAG’s 2019 Local Profile for the City of Thousand Oaks, foreclosures peaked in 2008 at a total of 373. According to RealtyTrac, there were a total of 29 properties in some stage of the foreclosure process in Thousand Oaks, as of August 2021, including 23 homes in pre-foreclosure and six homes under auction.14

6. Community Response to Intensification
Residents of Thousand Oaks understand the need for additional housing in the City; however, support also remains for the Measure E voter approval requirement for any General Plan Amendment proposing to increase land use density beyond the City’s 1996 baseline. Several recent development proposals for mixed-use development that include multi-family housing and requiring General Plan Amendments or Zone Changes have been met with this mixed response from the community which has led to lengthy public hearings and deliberations. Substantial City efforts related to the General Plan update have been focused on educating the community regarding benefits of compact development for providing housing opportunities. The residential sites inventory presented in the next Chapter identifies the parcels with the most potential for development over the next few years.

Outreach and education is the City’s main strategy for communicating with residents and stakeholders regarding a sustainable approach to growth in the community.

7. Energy Conservation
State law requires all new construction to comply with "energy budget" standards that establish maximum allowable energy use. These requirements apply to such design components as structural insulation, air infiltration and leakage control, setback features on thermostats, water heating system insulation (tanks and pipes) and swimming pool covers if a pool is equipped with a fossil fuel or electric heater. State law also requires that a tentative tract map provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, including designing the lot sizes and configurations to permit orienting structures to take advantage of a southern exposure, shade or prevailing breezes.

The City’s Building Division enforces the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Government Code Title 24, Part 6) and requires Title 24 calculations during plan check. The City has also adopted the California Green Building Standards Code, 2019 Edition.

The standards for new homes require windows that are more resistant to heat and better insulated, more efficient lighting, heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, and “cool roofs” that stay cooler than normal roofs when exposed to the sun than when compared to the standards in effect prior to 2009. All new housing in subdivisions of 50 or more in California have been required to offer solar energy as an option for homebuyers since 2010. These changes have and will continue to substantially reduce the amount of energy consumed in every new residence.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 82
Southern California Edison and the Southern California Gas Company offer energy conservation programs to residents of Thousand Oaks including audits of home energy use to reduce electricity consumption, rebates for efficient appliances, appliance repair and weatherization assistance to qualified low income households, buyer’s guides for appliances and incentives to switch from electric to gas appliances. Both companies have programs to encourage energy conservation in new construction. Southern California Edison’s Energy Savings Assistance program applies to residential developers as well as individual customers, and the Gas Company’s Energy Efficient New Homes Program is offered to residential developers who install energy-efficient gas appliances.

The City’s Climate and Environmental Action Plan that is currently underway will also address energy efficiency strategies as well and will be integrated into the General Plan Update.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 83
Housing Plan
The previous sections assess the housing needs in Thousand Oaks and evaluate the constraints and opportunities to the development and preservation of housing. This section sets forth the City’s housing goals and programs for the 2021-2029 planning period.

I. HOUSING GOALS
The City of Thousand Oaks has established the following housing goals:

Goal 1: Provide a wide range of housing opportunities for persons of all income levels.

Goal 2: Provide housing opportunities for persons with special needs.

Goal 3: Maintain and improve the existing housing stock of the City by reducing housing deterioration.

Goal 4: Preserve existing affordable housing opportunities.

Goal 5: Affirmatively further fair housing.

II. HOUSING PROGRAMS
Pursuant to State law, housing programs must have specific actions, measurable outcomes, and schedule for achievements. Each housing program may implement more than one housing goal.

However, they are organized based on the primary objective of the programs.

Goal 1: Provide a wide range of housing opportunities for persons of all income levels
Program 1: Adequate Sites for RHNA and Monitoring of No Net Loss The City of Thousand Oaks has been assigned a Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) of 2,621 units. Accounting for potential ADUs, pipeline and pending projects (936 units), the City has a remaining RHNA of 1,685 units (685 very low income, 372 low income, 459 moderate income, and 169 above moderate units) to be identified in the land inventory. Through the General Plan update, the City is creating several new land use designations with the potential to accommodate lower and moderate income housing:
• Neighborhood Medium-High – 20-30 du/ac
• Mixed-Use – 20-30 du/ac
The General Plan update is anticipated to be adopted in 2023. To ensure that the City monitors its compliance with SB 166 (No Net Loss), the City will develop a procedure to track:

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 84
• Unit count and income/affordability assumed on parcels included in the sites inventory; • Actual units constructed and income/affordability when parcels are developed; and • Net change in capacity and summary of remaining capacity in meeting remaining Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).

Pursuant to SB 166, the No Net Loss requirements are:
• Make findings at the time of project approval regarding any site in the Housing Element sites inventory (must be implemented immediately);
• Identify or rezone sufficient, adequate sites within 180 days of project approval to accommodate any shortfall; and
• Acknowledge projects may not be denied solely because No Net Loss may trigger the requirement to rezone another parcel(s) to replenish the sites inventory. Pursuant to AB 1397, development on sites with existing residential units is required to replace the existing affordable units or units occupied by lower income households, as a condition of project approval. AB 1397 replacement requirements are consistent with those for the State Density Bonus program.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Departmental budget
Objectives and Timeframe:
• Adopt the EndorsedPreferred Land Use Map as part of the General Plan update that provides increased residential development capacity in December 2023 (but no later than October 15, 2024), ensuring that the updated General Plan offers adequate capacity for the City’s remaining RHNA of 1,685 units (685 very low income, 372 low income, and 459 moderate income and 169 above moderate income units). Specifically, the Neighborhood Medium-High, Neighborhood Medium, and Mixed-Use designations proposed for meeting the City’s remaining lower and moderate income RHNA will meet the following conditions:
o Allows residential development up to 30 units per acre with a minimum density of 20 units per acre;
o Each site can accommodate at least 16 units (a site can be comprised of multiple parcels);
o Allows multi-family ownership and rental housing by right if 20 percent of the units are set aside as housing affordable to lower income households (see Program 2 below); and
o Allows standalone residential in Mixed Use designation (as required by State law when more than 50 percent of the lower income RHNA is being met in the Mixed Use designation).
• By December 2024, develop implementing development standards that will allow the achieving of maximum allowable densities in the respective zones.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 85
• Develop a procedure in December 2024 to monitor the development of sites in the sites inventory and ensure adequate sites are available to meet the remaining RHNA by income category.
• Amend the Zoning Code by December 2024 to require replacement housing as a condition of project approval on sites with existing residential units. • Develop implementing zoning standards by December 2024. Appropriate zoning standards (setbacks, height, open space, and parking) will be established to adequately facilitate the development of housing at the allowable densities as set forth in the General Plan. • Provide information on the sites inventory and development incentives to interested developers and property owners on City website by December 2023.

Program 2: By-Right Approval of Projects with 20 Percent Affordable Units Pursuant to AB 1397 passed in 2017, the City will amend its Zoning Ordinance to require by-right approval of housing development that includes 20 percent of the units as housing affordable to lower income households. This requirement applies to sites identified to meet the lower income RHNA (See Appendix B) when rezoning to make these sites available occurs after October 15, 2021 (statutory deadline of the Housing Element).

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Departmental budget
Objectives and Timeframe:
• Amend the Zoning Ordinance to provide by-right approval without discretionary review pursuant to AB 1397 by the end of June 2023.

Program 3: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) represents an alternative source for affordable housing to lower and moderate income households. The City will explore incentives and tools to facilitate ADU construction, including affordable ADUs. Incentives and tools may include, but are not limited to:
• Pre-approved site and floor plans;
• Expedited reviews and technical assistance;
• Reduced fees beyond State law requirement;
• Allowance of larger ADUs subject to discretionary review; and • Online resources on the City website.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Departmental budget
Objectives and Timeframe:
• Develop incentives and tools to facilitate ADU construction and feasibility of providing enhanced incentives in exchange for affordability covenants by June 2024.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 86
• Promote ADU construction by providing resources on the City’s website and at public counters (ongoing, continuous), including the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) $25,000 grant available to assist homeowners in constructing ADUs. o• Starting Spring 2023, the City of Thousand Oaks will commit to having dedicated staff for handling questions from the public and processing ADU applications. • In 2023, explore the feasibility of additional funding from the State to assist lower and moderate income homeowners to create ADUs (ongoing).
• Amend the ADU Ordinance in 2023 to address comments from the State HCD. • Inform ADU applicants that ADU units are subject to SB 329 and SB 222- Source of Income Protection-rental units cannot be denied based on source of income- by posting information on the City website and including a Fair Housing Factsheet in the ADU application by SpringSummer 2023.

Program 4: Lot Consolidation
Consolidation of small lots allows a development to utilize the land more efficiently, achieve economies of scale, and offer opportunity for improved site design and amenities. The City will encourage the consolidation of small lots to facilitate the development of mixed-use and multi-family developments, particularly for affordable housing, by:
• Maintaining an inventory of sites on the City’s website (ongoing); • Assisting developers in identification of parcels with lot consolidation potential; and • Utilizing a ministerial process for lot consolidation unless other discretionary reviews are required as part of the project.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Departmental budget
Objectives and Timeframe:
• By June 2024, eliminate the administrative hearing process and noticing requirements for lot consolidation and develop appropriate lot consolidation incentives that provide flexibility in site planning to facilitate mixed-use and multi-family development. • Provide technical assistance to interested developers and property owners regarding lot consolidation potential and procedure.
• Promote the program through dissemination of brochures at public counters and providing information on City website by December 2023.

Program 5: Shopping Center and Commercial Corridor Redevelopment Throughout the state, and even nationwide, the shift to online shopping has resulted in changes to the retail landscape. Many shopping centers are being reimagined as vibrant residential/commercial mixed-use development. However, redeveloping shopping centers presents some challenges, such as the large site scale, City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 87
configuration of existing structures and parking areas, existing lease terms, CC&R provisions, shared parking agreements, and community desire to maintain and rejuvenate retail services. The City will establish policies and development regulations to enable residential development at shopping centers through a range of approaches including:
• Full redevelopment;
• Addition of residential uses in existing surface parking areas; • Cluster residential development on underutilized portions of the site; and/or • Addition to or reconfiguration of the existing structures to include residential uses.

Specifically, policies and zoning development standards will be written to facilitate:
• Subdividing, if necessary, of the parking areas to create developable parcels; • Clustering of densities on portions of the parking areas; • Shared access to existing structures to allow existing uses to remain while the parking areas are being redeveloped or reconfigured; and
• A strong sense of place and cohesive urban design both within the site and in relation to the surrounding neighborhood.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: General FundsDepartmental Budget
Objectives and Timeframe:
• By Winter Summer 2023 as part of the General Plan and Zoning Code updates, develop land use policies and development standards to facilitate shopping center redevelopment with a strong sense of urban design cohesion.
• By Spring 2024 as part of the Zoning Code updates, adopt development standards to facilitate shopping center redevelopment with a strong sense of urban design cohesion. • Annually contact property owners and developers with experience in shopping center redevelopment to pursue redevelopment opportunities.
•
Program 56: Streamlined Review
Pursuant to State laws, the City will facilitate residential development by:
• Establishing Objective Design Standards (SB 330); and • Establishing a streamlined, ministerial review process for qualifying multi-family residential projects (SB 35).

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Departmental budget; SB2/LEAP
Objectives and Timeframe:
• By December 2022, establish objective design standards. • By December 2023, establish an SB 35 review process.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 88
Program 67: Affordable Housing Development
The City will continue to work with local nonprofits, such as Habitat for Humanity, Many Mansions, and the Housing Authority of the County of Ventura to expand affordable housing opportunities, especially to lower income households (including extremely low income) and those with special housing needs. Specifically, the City will:
• Identify potential development sites and financial assistance available. • Manage the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to finance the development, preservation, or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Where feasible, give priority to housing projects that address the needs of extremely low-income households and households with special needs (including those with developmental disabilities).
• Conduct a Financial Feasibility Analysis and Nexus Study in order to update the inclusionary housing in-lieu fee and non-residential development linkage fee based on changes in economic conditions.
• Encourage affordable housing providers to give priority to the housing needs of persons with disabilities, including, but not limited to, persons with developmental disabilities.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: HOME; Housing Trust Fund; Housing Land Trusts; PLHA; and other State and Federal funds as available
Objectives and Timeframe:
• Maintain a list of interested affordable housing developers and conduct a developer workshop every other year or when sites become available. Provide information on opportunity sites (available for sale or partnership with owners) to interested developers (on-going). • Annually explore available County, State, and Federal housing funds and pursue funding as appropriate to further the City’s affordable housing goals (on-going). • A PLHA grant was provided to the Housing Trust Fund of Ventura County for the State's Local Housing Trust Fund match in FY 2021-22. The City will pursue applicable future funding whenever available to contribute to the Housing Trust Fund. • Conduct a Financial Feasibility Analysis and Nexus Study in order to update the inclusionary housing ordinance with the goal of facilitating construction of affordable housing as part of projects, evaluate possible incentives and present an evaluation of updated in-lieu fee and linkage fee by 2023. Update Inclusionary Housing Ordinance by December 2023. • Provide developers with the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura and United Way of Ventura County contact information for HUD Section 8 tenant vouchers program (Annually each June, on-going as needed) to encourage the use of Housing Choice Vouchers. • Upon adoption of Housing Element, allow fee deferrals for all projects that provide a minimum of 20 percent affordable units in the lower income categories.

Program 78: Zoning Code Amendments
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 89
Recent changes to State law necessitate amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, these include:
• Manufactured Homes: The City processes applications for the development of manufactured homes in the same manner and subject to the same standards as conventional single-family homes. However, this practice has not been formalized in the Zoning Code. • Density Bonus: AB 2345 (GC Sections 65400 and 65915) signed by the Governor in September 2020 incentivizes the production of affordable housing by increasing the maximum available density bonus from 35 percent to 50 percent for qualifying projects not composed exclusively of affordable housing.
• Emergency and Transitional Housing: AB 139 (GC Sections 65583 and 65584) states that local governments may include parking requirements for emergency shelters, but specifies that adequate parking must be based solely on shelter staffing level and not to exceed the requirements for residential and commercial uses in the same zone. The City’s provisions currently require one parking space per staff person during the largest shift, plus 0.2 space for each resident and therefore are not in compliance with the State requirements. • Low Barrier Navigation Center: AB 101 (GC Sections 65660 to 65666) defines a Low Barrier Navigation Center as “a Housing First, low-barrier, service-enriched shelter focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides temporary living facilities while case managers connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter, and housing.” Low Barrier shelters may include options such as allowing pets, permitting partners to share living space, and providing storage for residents’ possessions.

AB 101 requires jurisdictions to permit Low Barrier Navigation Centers that meet specified requirements by-right in mixed-use zones and other nonresidential zones permitting multifamily residential development. The bill also imposes a timeline for cities to act on an application for the development of a Low Barrier Navigation Center. • Supportive Housing: AB 2162 (GC Sections 65650 to 65656) requires that supportive housing developments with 50 or fewer units be permitted by-right in zones where multifamily and mixed-use developments are permitted, provided the development meets certain requirements. Additionally, the bill prohibits jurisdictions from imposing parking requirements based on the number of units for supportive housing developments within one half mile of a public transit stop.
• Farmworker and Employee Housing: The State Employee Housing Act regarding farmworker housing (Health and Safety Code Section 17021.6) specifies that any farmworker housing consisting of no more than 36 beds in a group quarters or 12 units is considered an agricultural land use and therefore similarly permitted where agricultural uses are permitted.

Furthermore, the Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5) specifies that any employee housing providing accommodations for six or fewer employees shall be deemed a single-family structure with a residential land use designation.

Licensed Residential Care Facilities for Seven or More: Currently, larger licensed facilities are only permitted in select zones via a SUP. The City will amend the Zoning Code to conditionally permit larger facilities in residential zones, subject to similar uses in the same zones. Conditions for approval will be objective to provide certainty in outcomes. The City’s City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 90
Zoning Code is silent on unlicensed group homes that do not require licensing and therefore does not regulate these uses that are not governed by State laws. The City will amend the Zoning Code to specify that such housing is permitted by-right as a regular residential use.

Unlicensed Residential Care Facilities (Group Homes): The City will study best practices and amend the code to clarify a barrier free definition, including licensed and un-licensed facilities, and ensure objective criteria is applied to conditionally permit such facilities in residential, commercial and institutional zones. Conditions for approval will be objective to provide certainty in outcomes.
• Emergency Shelters: AB2339 (GC Sections 65583 and 65863) requires that emergency shelters be permitted by-right in one or more zones that allow residential uses, including mixed-uses, without a conditional use or other discretionary permit and that are suitable for residential uses. The City will amend the Zoning Code, to allow emergency shelters by-right with the future mixed-use zoning district and include objective standards for emergency shelters.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Departmental budget
Objectives and Timeframe:
• Complete Zoning Code amendments outlined above to expand the variety of housing types and remove governmental constraints by December 2024.
• Each June, annually review the Zoning Code for compliance with State law and identify potential constraints and amend the Zoning Code as necessary.

Goal 2: Provide housing opportunities for persons with
special needs
Program 89: County of Ventura Interagency Task Force to Implement the Plan to End Homelessness
The City will continue to be an active member of the Ventura County Continuum of Care Alliance, a collaborative group dedicated to promoting a safe, desirable and thriving community by ending homelessness in Ventura County. The City will continue to provide funds to support social service agencies that help prevent homelessness and assist the homeless. Specifically, the City has supported the operation of the RAIN Transition Living Center and Our Place Safe Haven with CDBG funds.

The City will also continue to ensure homeless service providers are connected with the County of Ventura Pathways to Home program and the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: CDBG
Objectives and Timeframe:

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 91
• Assist 50 homeless/at-risk homeless persons over eight years, with the goal to assist six persons annually (Assess annually in June).

Program 910: Housing and Supportive Services
The City will continue allocating funding to local non-profit groups who address the housing and supportive service needs of special needs households, including disabled, elderly households, and homeless/at-risk for homelessness persons. These include emergency food, motel vouchers, and assistance with rent, mortgage, or utility payments.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: CDBG
Objectives and Timeframe:
• Assist 4,000 special needs and homeless/at-risk persons over eight years, with the goal to assist 500 persons annually (Assess annually in June).

Goal 3: Maintain and improve the existing housing stock of the City by reducing housing deterioration
Program 1011: Residential Resale Housing Program
The City of Thousand Oaks requires that the seller of any residential property, upon entering into an agreement of sale or exchange, provide the buyer with a report of residential building records for the property. The report provides the buyer with the regular authorized use, occupancy and zoning classification of the property along with all building permits filed with the City.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Report and Inspection fees
Objectives and Timeframe:
• As funding permits, consider reinstating inspections on resale properties.

Program 1112: Mobile Home Rehabilitation
The City works with nonprofit organizations to carry out rehabilitation of mobile homes owned and occupied by lower income households. For example, in FY 2021, the two organizations working with the City are Habitat for Humanity and Senior Alliance for Empowerment (SAFE). Critical improvements include windows, doors, roofs, HVAC, flooring, plumbing, electrical, walk-in shower, grab bars, and wheelchair ramps.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: CDBG
Objectives and Timeframe:

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 92
• Continue to provide assistance to mobile home owners for rehabilitation with the goal of assisting 80 lower income households over eight years (10 households annually).

Program 1213: Rental Housing Rehabilitation
The City continues to work with nonprofit housing organizations to pursue rehabilitation of multifamily rental housing properties that are for lower-income use. Recent grant awards for project improvements include Los Arboles Apartments (12 units) owned by the Housing Authority of the County of Ventura and Shadow Hills Apartments (100 units) owned by Many Mansions.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: CDBG and other State and Federal funds as available Objectives and Timeframe:
• Continue to provide assistance to rehabilitate multi-family rental housing with the goal of assisting 400 lower income households over eight years, with the goal to assist with 50 units annually (review annually in June)
• Continue to encourage owners to pursue additional funding at the State and Federal levels to expand rental rehabilitation assistance and extend affordable term.

Goal 4: Preserve existing affordable housing opportunities Program 1314: Affordable Housing Monitoring and Preservation of At-Risk Housing
The City has an inventory of over 1,100 affordable housing units that serve the critical needs of lower income households. Preservation of the existing affordable housing in the community is an important City goal. Among the inventory of affordable units, three properties with a total of 173 units may be in jeopardy of losing the affordability during the next ten years. These properties are Arroyo Villas, Conejo Future, and Los Arboles Apartments. Conejo Future and Los Arboles continues to support HUD Section 8 programs, so its risk of conversion is limited. The remaining property, Arroyo Villas, was developed with a density bonus and total 40 units expiring in the next ten years that are distributed throughout the development.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: HOME; Housing Trust Funds; Housing Land Trusts; PLHA; and other State and Federal funds as available
Objectives and Timeframe:
• Contact the property management company or property owner annually to evaluate risk of conversion to market rate (on-going). If threatened with conversion to market rate:
o Help property owner find alternate sources of funding to preserve the affordable units; City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 93
o Provide owners with the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura and United Way of Ventura County contact information for HUD Section 8 tenant vouchers program;
o Facilitate sale of property to an affordable housing developer/operator to preserve affordable units; and
o Consider funding assistance from City to prevent conversion to market rate. • Ensure property owners are aware of the new State noticing requirements prior to opting out of low income use (three-year, one-year, and six-month noticing required) (on-going). • Inform ADU applicants that ADU units are subject to SB 329 and SB 222- rental unit cannot be denied based on source of income- by posting information on the City website and including a Fair Housing Factsheet in the ADU application by SpringSummer 2023. • Assist affordable housing groups in securing local and other sources of funds to extend existing affordability covenants to existing multi-family housing to target the preservation of potentially at-risk units (on-going).
•
Goal 5: Affirmatively further fair housing
Table 42Table 42 at the end of this section consolidates the City’s meaningful actions to affirmatively further fair housing from Programs 154- 187 below as well as from throughout the city’s Housing Plan
Program 1415: Fair Housing Outreach and Enforcement
The City will continue to contract with appropriate outside agencies such as Housing Rights Center (HRC) in collaboration with Ventura County and other local jurisdictions to provide fair housing services.

However, outreach and enforcement will go beyond fair housing services to affirmatively further fair housing. Thousand Oaks strives to have an active and engaged citizenry who desire involvement in the City’s decision-making process. Therefore, it is important to continue to involve residents through inclusive and robust community engagement.

The following General Plan Implementation Actions are marked as related to health, equity, and environmental justice in the GP and align with the Housing Element’s strategy to provide greater opportunities for engagement and outreach:
• G-A.1: Build a new mobile friendly, accessible website that will serve as an information hub in an easy to navigate, user focused design. Provide timely, relevant information that meets and exceeds (where possible) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines and offers flexibility in displaying emergency notifications, public meeting notices, and other important, frequently updated information.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 94
• G-A.2: Participate in community discussions and partner with other public agencies, nonprofit organizations, and community stakeholders to explore strategies that address social and racial inequities.
• G-A.3: Seek out and utilize state and national resources to support the City’s equity and inclusion efforts.
• G-A.4: Conduct an internal equity assessment of existing City programs, and policies, to develop strategies that address racial and social inequities. • G-A.6 Evaluate and modify appointment criteria to strive for greater diversity of representation.
• G-A.7: Develop a disability access plan to integrate the needs of the disabled community into all aspects of the City - from budget allocations, to transportation, governance, emergency, City events, housing, etc.
• G-A.9: Track the usage and effectiveness of communication methods and reallocate resources to the most impactful methods of reaching community members as platforms and technology shifts
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: CDBG
Objectives and Timeframe: Refer to Table 42Table 42 for specific actions, timeframes, and outcomes..

Program 1516: Housing Mobility
Housing Mobility Strategies consist of strategically enhancing access and removing barriers to housing in areas of opportunity and strategically enhancing access.. The Housing Choice Voucher (HCV)HCV program represents an important affordable housing resource for extremely low and very low income households, especially those who are seniors and disabled. As of June 2021, 545 Thousand Oaks households (including approximately 246 households with disabilities, 138 senior households, and 161 family households) were receiving Housing Choice Vouchers. Among the voucher recipients, 25 percent are seniors and 45 percent are households with persons with disabilities. The City will continue to promote the use of HCVs to enhance housing affordability and expand housing/locational choices for these vulnerable segments of the community. Specific actions include:
• Planning Department to provide developers with contact to AHA and United Way to promote and expand location of landlord engagement participating in voucher programs. • Amending residential development affordable housing agreement review procedure to incorporate information of voucher programs to new developers.

ADU and SB 9 are also another component of the City’s Mobility Strategy, by expanding housing opportunities for lower income households in lower density neighborhoods:
• Create a Fair Housing Factsheet to be included in ADU and SB 9 application packets, educating homeowners of their fair housing obligations as potential landlords, including source of income protection (such as use of HCVs).

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 95
• Post notices on City website and public counter, TOTV, newspaper, and with local stakeholders. Annually provide city social media advertisement and include topic in annual Housing Rights Center Fair Housing workshops.

Other ways the City can enhance mobility is by removing barriers to housing in areas of opportunity.

To that end, the following actions will be implemented Other actions include:
• Update the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and linkage fees program that will be used to facilitate the development of affordable housing.
• Adopt objective standards that apply to all residential projects, which define all housing types, including small, medium, and large-scale multifamily buildings.

Responsible Agencies: Community Development Department; Housing Authority of the County of Ventura; United Way of Ventura County
Funding Sources: HUD Section 8 funds; Department budget Objectives and Timeframe: Refer to Table 42Table 42 for specific actions, timeframes, and outcomes.

Program 1617: New Opportunities in High Resource Areas
High cost of housing limits the housing type and locational choices for lower and moderate income households. Through the General Plan 2045 update, the City of Thousand Oaks proposes new land use designations to accommodate higher intensity housing types:
• Neighborhood Medium (10-20 du/ac)
• Neighborhood Medium-High (20-30 du/ac)
• Mixed-Use (20-30 du/ac)
The following General Plan Implementation Actions are marked as related to health, equity, and environmental justice in the GP and align with the Housing Element’s strategy to create new housing opportunities in high resource areas:
• LU-A.3: Adopt and implement and Inclusionary Housing Program within 1-3 years. • LU-A.10: Study and determine nexus to implement a fee program where new commercial and/or industrial developments pay a fee to fund affordable housing units within 1-3 years. • LU-A.8: Conduct a study to investigate modifying parking requirements for new mixed-use development and adaptive reuse projects. Revise the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code accordingly within 1-3 years.

Furthermore, the City will be updating its inclusionary housing and linkage fee programs, potentially enhancing the City’s ability to expand affordable housing development throughout the City.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Departmental budget
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 96
Objectives and Timeframe: Refer to Table 42Table 42 for specific actions, timeframes, and outcomes.

Program 1718: Neighborhood Improvement Program
Annually through the City’s CDBG program, the City identifies low and moderate income neighborhoods for targeted community development improvements, including rehabilitation of affordable housing. The City Council also established the Community Funding Review Committee that oversees several grant programs aimed at community improvements described below. In addition, through the Capital Improvements Budget process capital improvements that are needed throughout the City are identified and prioritized. Capital improvements are funded through various sources.

The City has established a number of boards and commissions besides the Planning Commission that participate in the decision-making process of housing, community development, and prioritization of improvements that provide opportunities for public engagement. These include:
• Community Funding Review Committee: Acts in an advisory capacity to the City Council relative to funding issues for the Community Enhancement Grants (supports projects having an environmental benefit across a wide cross-section of Thousand Oaks), Community Events Grants (supports artistic and cultural events and activities), Social Services Grants (operational support grants to non-profit agencies assisting primarily lower-income City residents), and Sports Facility Grants (supports building or improvement of existing sports fields or facilities and equipment purchase for use by the community).
• Council on Aging: Serves as an advisory body to City Council on senior adult issues within the community. The Council on Aging implements the annual Senior of the Year Awards and the City Senior Adult Master Plan.
• Youth Commission: Serve as an advisory body to the City Council on youth issues and hosts several youth services/events in the community, including the Youth Master Plan. The Youth Commission consists of 13 members (ages of 13 – 19) and adult representatives from Conejo Recreation and Park District and Conejo Youth Employment Service. • Disabled Access Appeals and Advisory Board: Acts in an advisory capacity relative to measures and methods utilized to promote disabled accessibility in the City. • Thousand Oaks Plan to Assist School Sites: Assists the School District in raising financing and with use of earnings on endowment fund set up to aid in the construction of capital improvements to designated schools.

The following General Plan Implementation Actions are marked as related to health, equity, and environmental justice or sustainability in the GP and align with the Housing Element’s strategy to improve neighborhoods, particularly those where sites have been identified:
• LU-A.13: Develop Complete Streets strategy and update streetscape design for Thousand Oaks Boulevard and mixed-use developments within 1-3 years. • POS-A.1: Review and update the park standards to recognize the park requirements and space limitations of high-density multifamily and mixed-use housing.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 97
• CFS-A.1: Support the implementation of universal broadband to reduce the digital divide faced by small businesses and low-income households, particularly in underserved communities.

Responsible Agencies: City Manager’s Office, City Clerk Department, Finance Department, Community Development Department and Public Works Department Funding Sources: CDBG, General Fund, Various Grants
Objectives and Timeframe: Refer to Table 42 for specific actions, timeframes, and outcomes.

Table 42.

Program 1819: Tenant Protection and Anti-Displacement
The vulnerable communities identified in the City of Thousand Oaks are located in census tracts along Highway 101 in the center of the City, especially adjacent to Highway 23 (Figure D-42). These same areas have also been identified as “areas of change” for redevelopment as well as targeted place-based investment to improve conditions. While these investments and changes can be positive, they are also associated with displacement, as historic residents cannot afford to stay and benefit from investments in housing and infrastructure. The City has included measures to protect existing residents and businesses from displacement by establishing a requirement for developers to create an Affirmative Marketing Plan and through collaboration with the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Association and Economic Development Division.

Furthermore, the City will be updating its inclusionary housing and linkage fee programs, potentially enhancing the City’s ability to expand affordable housing opportunities for residents throughout the City.

Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Funding Sources: Departmental budget
Objectives and Timeframe: Refer to Table 42Table 42 for specific actions, timeframes, and outcomes.
.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 98
Table 42: Fair Housing Plan- AFFH Meaningful Actions Matrix Prog/ GP
Implementation
Action
Specific Commitment Timeline Geographic
Targeting Eight-Year Metrics
Fair Housing Outreach and Enforcement
1415
Coordinate with County regarding 2020 AI recommendation to expand the scope of services of contract for fair housing services with HRC to include expanded fair housing testing for discriminatory practices impacting both renters and
homebuyers and require routine reporting of activity by jurisdiction.

Starting FY 2023 Citywide Establish baseline service level in 2023 and aim to increase number
of people served by Fair Housing
Program by 20 percent over eight
years.

Reduce the number of fair housing
complaints by 20 percent over
eight years.

Host an annual fair housing seminar to increase public
awareness of fair housing laws and services, conducting increased outreach to neighborhoods that are impacted by low and moderate income concentration, displacement risks, and disproportionate housing needs.

Specifically, coordinate with HRC to vary meeting location and times, starting by moving Housing Workshops from the
Thousand Oaks Library to City Hall or in census tract 71.00.

City Hall is located in the lower resource area (census tract

71.00). Follow up with HRC after meetings to evaluate
attendance at locations and modify outreach location or times as necessary based on attendance outcomes.

Starting FY 2023 Low Resource Areas
Tract 71.00
Ensure HRC includes outreach and education of the State’s new Source of Income Protection (SB 329 and SB 222),
defining public assistance including HCVs as legitimate source of income for housing. Create a Fair Housing
Factsheet to be included in ADU and SB 9 application
packets, educating homeowners of their fair housing
obligations as potential landlords, including source of income protection (such as use of HCVs).

Starting FY 2023 Citywide
Update City’s Fair Housing Resource webpage:
www.toaks.org/departments/communitydevelopment/housing/fair-housing.

Annually N/A
Provide fair housing information throughout the City via the City’s website, City Hall, libraries and community centers (ongoing). Specifically, utilize non-traditional media (i.e. social Ongoing Citywide
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 99
Table 42: Fair Housing Plan- AFFH Meaningful Actions Matrix Prog/ GP
Implementation
Action
Specific Commitment Timeline Geographic
Targeting Eight-Year Metrics
media, City website) in outreach and education efforts, in addition to print media and notices.

Continue to offer Spanish translation services and closed captions at City Council Meetings (started in 2021).

Ongoing Citywide
Encourage residents to sign up for City newsletter by
promoting on city website, and social media, and at
community events..

Spring 2023 Citywide Increase the number of residents
signed up to newsletter by 10%
Housing Mobility
1516 Planning Department to provide developers with contact to AHA and United Way to promote and expand location of
landlord engagement participating in voucher programs.

Starting 2023 High Resource
Tracts
Increase the number of people
using vouchers by 5% over eight
years (from the current level of
523 households). Work to
increase the use of HCVs in High
Resource tracts by 10%.
1516 Amending residential development affordable housing agreement review procedure to incorporate information of voucher programs to new developers.

Spring 2023 Citywide
3 Inform ADU applicants that ADU units are subject to SB 329 and SB 222- rental unit cannot be denied based on source of income- by posting information on the City website and
creating a Fair Housing Factsheet in the ADU application packet.

Spring 2023 Citywide
3 Expand outreach and education of the State’s new Source of Income Protection (SB 329 and SB 222), defining public
assistance including HCVs as legitimate source of income for housing (on-going) by informing tenants and landlords
through the City’s social media platforms, as well as ensure Housing Rights Center includes this topic in their outreach events..

Starting 2023 Citywide
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 100
Table 42: Fair Housing Plan- AFFH Meaningful Actions Matrix Prog/ GP
Implementation
Action
Specific Commitment Timeline Geographic
Targeting Eight-Year Metrics
Post notices on City website and public counter, TOTV,
newspaper, and with local stakeholders. Annually provide city social media advertisement and include topic in annual
Housing Rights Center Fair Housing workshops.
67 Update the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and linkage fees program. The City is expecting to adopt any changes by the Spring ofFall 2023.

Adoption by the
FallSpring 2023
and ongoing
Citywide, with
emphasis in High
Resource tracts
AAim to achieve 10 percent of
new construction as affordable
units. Target 30% of the
inclusionary units or units created
with in-lieu fees in High Resource
Tracts.
58 Adopt objective standards that apply to all residential projects, which define all housing types, including small, medium, and large-scale multifamily buildings.

Effective April
2022/Ongoing
Citywide Ongoing application to new
residential and mixed-use
development.

Place-Based Strategy for Neighborhood Improvements
1718 Encourage residents from low and moderate income
neighborhoods and areas impacted by disproportionate
housing needs and displacement risks to participate in the decision-making process through appropriate boards and
commissions. The City will continue to expand outreach
through extensive social media posting and by being in direct contact with various groups, such as the City’s Youth
Commission, to encourage participation in the decisionmaking process.

Ongoing` Low Resource Areas
(Tract 71.00, 59.06)
and Sensitive
Communities
Annually report on diversity of
commission members (number of
applicants and how many are
appointed) and aim to increase
diversity over time.

By 2028, at least XXX commission
members achieve diverse
community representation should
be that reflects the demographics
of from the Low Resource Areas
and Sensitive Communities.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 101
Table 42: Fair Housing Plan- AFFH Meaningful Actions Matrix Prog/ GP
Implementation
Action
Specific Commitment Timeline Geographic
Targeting Eight-Year Metrics
1718 Coordinating with Public Works to prioritize areas identified as low resource and sensitive communities in the implementation of: 2019 Active Transportation Plan, Local Road Safety Plan, 2019 ADA Transition Plan, and capital improvement projects.

Specifically coordinate the completion of the projects listed on pg. D-71.

Annually Low Resource Areas
(Tract 71.00, 59.06)
and Sensitive
Communities
Increase transit ridership by 10%.

Add 2 miles of new bike lanes.

Add 100 new ADA Ramps.

Construct additional pedestrian
crossing citywide (Thousand Oaks
Blvd. or in Mixed Use areas)
1718 Update General Plan: Mobility Element to include policy direction towards multimodal improvements/ Complete Streets standards for Mixed Use Areas
By Fall 2023 Citywide Adopt Complete Street standards
for Mixed-Use Areas by 2025.
56 Adopt Objective Standards that require include Open Space amenities for younger children in projects of 25 units or more and general use, teenagers and younger children open space areas as part of new development of 100 units or more.

Effective April
2022/Ongoing
Citywide Ongoing application to new
residential and mixed-use
development.
76 Prioritize projects in low and moderate resource areas for affordable housing by non-profit developers, with City’s funds and include the prioritization in NOFAs.

Beginning FY
2023
Low Resource Tracts
(71.00, 59.06)
Moderate Tracts
(61.00 and 70.00)
Annual review of projects with
potential for receiving City funding
for affordable housing.Facilitate
the development of 1,229 lower
income housing units. Seek to
achieve 40 percent of affordable
units to benefit Low and Moderate
Resource tracts, and rest in
Higher Resource tracts.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 102
Table 42: Fair Housing Plan- AFFH Meaningful Actions Matrix Prog/ GP
Implementation
Action
Specific Commitment Timeline Geographic
Targeting Eight-Year Metrics
89 Continue to partner with the County of Ventura on financial resources for homeless supportive services and affordable housing development.

OngoingAnnually Citywide Annual support to award funds in support for special needs housing.

Provide supportive housing
services to 500 special needs
households.

New Opportunity in High Resource Areas
56 Adopt Zoning Code update to implement General Plan 2045.

Specifically, ensure a variety of housing types can be
accommodated, including but not limited to co-housing,
live/work, senior housing, and assisted living, among others.

June 2025 Citywide Units projected by
RHNA.Facilitate the development
of 2,621 new units, including
1,229 lower income units. Seek to
achieve 40 percent of affordable
units to benefit Low and Moderate
Resource tracts, and the rest in
Higher Resource tracts.
56, 67
LU A-3
Update the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and linkage fees program. Consider the following as part of the
evaluation of the linkage fee program:
- If in-lieu fee is collected, consider establishing priority for funding to address extremely low income and special housing needs and first right of return for displaced residents - Explore feasibility of linkage fee exceptions for mixed-use projects if project does not increase square footage as an anti-displacement strategy to stabilize local businesses The City is expecting to adopt any changes by the Spring ofFall 2023.

Adoption by the
SpringFall 2023
and ongoing
Citywide Achieve 10 percent of new
construction as affordable units.

Target 30% of the inclusionary
units or units created with in-lieu
fees in High Resource Tracts.Aim
to achieveAchieve 10 percent of
new construction as affordable
units.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 103
Table 42: Fair Housing Plan- AFFH Meaningful Actions Matrix Prog/ GP
Implementation
Action
Specific Commitment Timeline Geographic
Targeting Eight-Year Metrics
56 Adopt objective standards that define all housing types. Effective April 2022/Ongoing
Citywide Ongoing application to new
residential and mixed-use
development.
76 Support funding applications by developers for projects with 20% affordable housing in the lower income categories
citywide by deferral of processing and certain impact fees until project occupancy.

December 2023 Citywide AAim to achieve 10 percent of
new construction as affordable
units. Seek to achieve 40 percent
of affordable units to benefit Low
and Moderate Resource tracts,
and rest in Higher Resource
tracts.
1516 Promote housing mobility and housing access to areas of high resources by:

1. Adopting the Land Use Element Plan which creates a new category of Mixed-Use
December 2023 Mixed-Use
designated areas
Units projected in Mixed-Use
category (1,770 total, 1,239 lower
income, 453 moderate income,
and 78 above moderate income).

2. Allocating lower income RHNA units in mixed-income
developments using the Mixed-Use designation in areas with high resources.

Starting Winter
2025
High Resource Areas

3. Exploring options for incentivizing housing development for all income levels at the Oaks Mall site by Fall 2025. Strategies may include affordable housing requirements in exchange for potential design concessions and other incentives.

Fall 2025 High Resource Area
Tenant Protection and Anti-Displacement
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 104
Table 42: Fair Housing Plan- AFFH Meaningful Actions Matrix Prog/ GP
Implementation
Action
Specific Commitment Timeline Geographic
Targeting Eight-Year Metrics
1819 Establish a requirement for developers to create an Affirmative Marketing Plan for affordable units.

Early 2023 Citywide Annually monitor the demographic
characteristics of new affordable
housing tenants, and aim to
increase diversity in tenant profile.
67,1819 As part of the evaluation of the linkage fee program expected by summer of 2023, explore feasibility of linkage fee exceptions for mixed-use projects if project does not increase square footage as an anti-displacement strategy (would apply to redevelopment of sites with existing commercial or for any mixed use development.

End of 2023 Citywide Units projected in Mixed-Use
category (1,770 total, 1,239 lower
income, 453 moderate income,
and 78 above moderate income).
1819 Continue supporting the Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Association and businesses in the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan, which creates a layer of assistance for small businesses by making it easy for them to thrive and support neighborhood housing.

Annual review of funds available for small business assistance that support neighborhood housing.

Ongoing Specific Plan 20
boundaries, including
Low Resource
Tracts.

Annual review of funds available
for small business assistance that
support neighborhood housing.

Monthly newsletters that provide a
combination of training and other
resources available to small
businesses.

Assist XX20 businessesMonthly
newsletters that provide a
combination of training and other
resources available to small
businesses.
1819 Promote the City’s Economic Development Division through newsletters and social media as the point of contact for small businesses to get assistance and provide resources.

Monthly newsletters that provide a combination of training and other resources available to small businesses.

Ongoing Specific Plan 20
boundaries, including
Low Resource
Tracts.
1819 Increased visibility of the jurisdiction’s small business assistance programs through the City’s monthly Economic Development Newsletter and social media platforms.

Monthly newsletters that provide a combination of training and other resources available to small businesses.

Ongoing Specific Plan 20
boundaries, including
Low Resource
Tracts.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 105
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 106
III. QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES
The following summarizes the quantified objective for the 2021-2029 Housing Element planning period.

Table 43: 2021-2029 Quantified Objectives
New Construction Rehabilitation Conservation
Extremely Low-Income1 367 0 0
Very Low-Income1 368 0 0
Low-Income 494 4802 403
Moderate-Income 532 0 0
Above Moderate-Income 860 0 0
Totals 2,621 480 40
1 City has a RHNA allocation of 735 very low income units (inclusive of extremely low income units). Pursuant to State law (AB 2634), the City must project the number of extremely low income housing needs based on Census income distribution or assume 50 percent of the very low income units as extremely low. Assuming an even split, the City’s RHNA allocation of 735 very low income units may be divided into 368 very low and 367 extremely low income units. However, for purposes of identifying adequate sites for the RHNA allocation, State law does not mandate the separate accounting for the extremely low income category.
2 Program 11 and Program 12
3 Program 13
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-1
Appendix A: Public Participation
Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update Comprehensive List of Public Outreach and Engagement Activities. Activities specifically related to housing are in blue bolded font.

SUMMARY OF OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT FOR PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS (April 2019 to August 2019)
Stakeholder Interviews: Raimi + Associates conducted twelve stakeholder interviews with Thousand Oaks industry leaders, educational entities, and community-based organizations about issues and opportunities. Members from the following affiliations were interviewed on June 24 & June 25, 2019:
• California Lutheran University
• Caruso
• Conejo Valley Unified School District
• Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce
• Los Angeles Rams
• Local Business owners
• Los Robles Hospital
• Macerich (The Oaks Mall)
• NewMark Merrill Companies (Janss Marketplace)
• The Acorn
• Thousand Oaks Boulevard Association
• Thousand Oaks residents
• T.O. Arts
Economic Development Focus Group: HR&A Advisors Inc led a focus group meeting on economic development on July 18, 2019. The event focused on soliciting feedback from key stakeholders on existing conditions and identifying local economic strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

Members from the following affiliations participated in the discussion:
• California Lutheran University, Caruso, Lee & Associates, Amgen, CBRE, Macerich, NewMark Merrill Companies, Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce, TOBA (provided input separately)
City Council Study Session:
• August 27, 2019 – General Plan Kick Off. No public speakers and one written statement submitted.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-2
SUMMARY OF OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT FOR PHASE 2: LISTENING & VISIONING (September 2019 to December 2019)
Mailer: General Plan mailer to promote upcoming community workshop and pop-up workshops was included in 38,004 City water and wastewater bills on September 3, 2019.

Community Workshops:
• Community Workshop #1 to engage the community in identifying the vision and key priorities for the General Plan update on September 12, 2019 (126 attendees, not including the consultant team and city staff).
• Arts Town Hall to engage the arts community in a discussion about the Arts and Culture Element on November 18, 2019. (36 attendees, not including the consultant team and city staff)
Online Survey #1: The first survey was available from September 24, 2019 to January 10, 2020 and participants were asked to share what they like about Thousand Oaks and their vision, and describe issues and challenges in the City. There were 617 survey responses.

City Council Study Session: November 19, 2019 – Public Engagement Update: Three public speakers and one written statement submitted.

Community Forum:
• Forum #1 “The Happy City” with speaker Charles Montgomery, 6:00pm – 9:00pm, October 2, 2019. The forum focused on developing a vision for a happy and livable city and led a discussion for the General Plan update. Insights from this forum will shape the vision and guiding principles. Approximately 115 attendees.

General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) Meetings:
• GPAC Meeting #1: GPAC Overview, August 28, 2019 Number of attendees: 41 • GPAC Meeting #2: Planning Principles, September 25, 2019 Number of attendees:

Approximately 40
• GPAC Meeting #3: Community Values, November 11, 2019 Number of attendees: 34 Pop-Up Workshops (the same activities were conducted at the pop-ups as the community workshop):
• Senior Summit, April 10, 2020 (cancelled due to COVID-19) • 2020 Wellness Fest, 8:00am - 1:00pm, January 15, 2020 (about 50 people) • YMCA Youth & Government, 6:30pm – 8:00pm, December 4, 2019 (about 35 students) • Chamber of Commerce Board Retreat, November 12, 2019 (about 35 attendees) • TOHS Youth Latino Leadership Class, 3:00pm – 4:00pm, November 5, 2019 (32 attendees) • Amgen, 10:30am – 1:00pm, November 5, 2019 (about 25 people) • Tarantula Hill Brewing Company, October 26, 2019 (about 35 people) • Sage Publications & Atara Biotherapeutics, 11:30am – 1:00pm, October 23, 2019 (65 people) • Farmer’s Market, October 24, 2019 (cancelled due to wind) City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-3
• Rotary Street Fair, 9:00am – 4:00pm, October 20, 2019 (over 100 people) • Civic Arts Plaza 25th Anniversary, 1:00pm – 4:00pm, October 13, 2019 (about 70 adults and 30 children)
• Conejo Valley Pride Festival, 9:00am – 4:00pm, September 28, 2019 (about 70 people) Outreach via Email:

Email blasts sent to general plan update contact list (1,332 subscribers):
• November 15, 2019, City Council to Discuss Community Vision – https://conta.cc/2QnDjHP
• October 25, 2019, Last Chance To Take The Thousand Oaks 2045 Community Survey #1! – https://conta.cc/2Nh7k9d
• October 9, 2019, Share your vision for Thousand Oaks! – https://conta.cc/2VuxFnG • September 11, 2019, General Plan Community Workshop #1 – https://conta.cc/305MIF5 Mentions in City’s CityScene Newsletters (1,549 subscribers):
• October 2019 – https://conta.cc/2mInNKk
• September 2019 – https://conta.cc/32hl49W
Mentions in City’s Economic Development Newsletter (545 subscribers):
• October 2019 – https://conta.cc/2oxHN2M
• September 2019 - https://conta.cc/32v5aIP
Mentions in City’s Sustainability Newsletters (10,300 subscribers):
• August 2019 – promoted workshop and pop-up workshop dates • September 2019 - promoted workshop and pop-up workshop dates Other:
• Email sent on August 18, 2020 to all the California Lutheran University Masters of Public Policy Administration students to promote upcoming GPAC meeting Advertisements:
• Paid for use of City Hall marquee to promote workshop and forum events • Posters put up in City Hall, both City Libraries, and Janss Marketplace to promote workshop, pop-up workshops, and forum
• Paid Ads in The Acorn to promote first round of workshops on: Size 5x8 on September 5, 12, 19, 26, 2019
• Paid Ads in the VC Star to promote first round of workshops on: Size ¼ page, weekly from September 30, 2019 to October 18, 2019
Giveaways:
• Paid for 50 books of “The Happy City” to be given to attendees at the first community forum City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-4
• Paid for 250 canvas tote bags; 250 grocery tote bags; 1000 business cards; 200 coasters; 1,000 pens; 1,500 stickers; and 1000 bookmarks to give away at events Newspaper Articles: See Pages 8 – 11.

SUMMARY OF OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT FOR PHASE 3: POLICY
DEVELOPMENT & PLAN ALTERNATIVES (December 2019 to May 2021) *Starting in April 2020, all outreach and engagement for this phase was conducted virtually* Community Forum:
• Forum #2 “The Math of Smart Growth: Why we can’t afford to keep building the same way” with speaker Joe Minicozzi, 6:00pm – 9:00pm, January 29, 2020. This forum focused on the relationship between development and community economic health. Approximately 50 attendees.

Online Survey:
• Online Survey #2 – The second survey was available from February 28, 2020 to May 4, 2020, and there were 461 responses. The purpose of the survey was to confirm and prioritize feedback on values, issues facing the community and a vision for the future. Community members were also asked to prioritize top strengths and challenges in Thousand Oaks and provide comments on a map where future growth and change (e.g., housing, entertainment, open space) should be located in the city.

GPAC Meetings:
• GPAC Meeting #4: Housing Existing Conditions, December 12, 2019 Number of attendees:
30 • GPAC Meeting #5: Economic and Market Conditions, February 6, 2020 Number of attendees: 33
• GPAC Meeting #6: Review Current and Potential Land Use, March 5, 2020 Number of attendees: 37
• GPAC Meeting #7: Transportation, May 28, 2020 Number of attendees via Zoom: 123 • GPAC Meeting #8: Environmental Justice and Social Equity, July 23, 2020 Number of attendees via Zoom: Approximately 48
• GPAC Meeting #9: Safety and Resilience, August 20, 2020 Number of attendees via Zoom:

Approximately 49
• GPAC Meeting #10: Sustainability, September 24, 2020 Number of attendees via Zoom:

Approximately 53
• GPAC Meeting #11: Arts and Culture, October 22, 2020 Number of attendees via Zoom:

Approximately 58
• GPAC Meeting #12: Parks and Open Space, November 19, 2020 Number of attendees via Zoom: 54
• GPAC Meeting #13: Joint GPAC and Community Workshop, Land Use Alternatives, February 2, 2021
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-5
• GPAC Meeting #14: Land Use Alternatives Survey Review, March 25, 2021 Number of attendees via Zoom: 97 + 11 YouTube Live viewers
• GPAC Meeting #15: Review of Preferred Land Use Alternative, April 21, 2001 City Council Study Session: February 11, 2020 – Housing: The state of housing in Thousand Oaks today, Housing Element update, and state regulations were discussed. One public speaker.

Community Workshop #2: February 2, 2021 – Joint GPAC Meeting #13 and Community Workshop to present the three draft land use alternatives. Number of attendees via Zoom: 255 + 45 YouTube Live viewers.

Community Workshop #3: April 21, 2021 – Joint GPAC Meeting #15 and Community Workshop.

Review of Preferred Land Use Alternative.

Online Survey #3: Available from February 2, 2021 to March 15, 2021, and there were 2,127 responses.
• Hard copies of survey and briefing book were hand delivered by request • Copies of Spanish and English surveys and briefing books picked up by Adelante Comunidad (100 surveys and 20 briefing books)
• Copies of Spanish and English surveys and briefing books dropped off to Westminster Clinic (100 surveys and 3 briefing books)
• 1,000 Flyers distributed by the Thousand Oaks Library • 500 Flyers distributed to Meals on Wheels through Senior Concerns and 1,000 flyers were sent to other homebound and senior groups through Conejo Recreation and Park District volunteers
Online Survey #4: Available from April 16, 2021 to May 12, 2021, for the Preferred Land Use Alternative, and there were 2,726 survey responses. The survey sought feedback on the preferred land use map, which identifies the proposed land use designations for comprehensive up to the Thousand Oaks General Plan.

Virtual Office Hours (66 total participants):
• February 11, 2021, 6:00pm – 8:00pm
• February 17, 2021, 6:00pm – 8:00pm
• February 20, 2021, 10:00am – 12:20pm
• February 23, 2021, 10:00am – 12:00pm
These groups invited the General Plan update team for a presentation and Q&A (January to March 2021):
• January 11th – We Belong 805
• January 11th – Democratic Club of Conejo Valley January 13th – Thousand Oaks Livable Action Network
• January 28th and January 29th – stakeholders’ meetings with Macerich (The Oaks Mall), Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce, NewMark Merrill Companies (Janss City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-6
Marketplace), The Acorn, Thousand Oaks Boulevard Association, Lee & Associates, Rexford Industrial, Newmark Group, CBRE, Amgen, Westlake BioPartners, and Atara Biotherapeutics • February 9th – Thousand Oaks Teen Advisory League February 16th – Los Angeles Rams • February 17th – Council on Aging February 17th – Youth Commission • February 18th – Conejo Recreation and Park District Meeting February 22nd – Thousand Oaks Livable Action Network
• February 23rd – Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce Legislative Roundtable February 24th – City of Thousand Oaks Finance Dept.
• February 24th – Latino Connection February 25th – Village Homes HOA February 25th – We Belong 805
• March 1st – Adelante Comunidad and Buen Vecino
• March 11th – Casa Conejo Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) Equity Focus Group: Provide an overview of the General Plan update and SB 1000 requirements, discuss examples of equity in Thousand Oaks, and brainstorm a vision for equity in Thousand Oaks.

Number of attendees: 19.

Planning Commission Meeting (Spanish translation provided):
• March 29, 2021 – Consideration of GP Land Use Alternatives. • April 26, 2021 – Consideration and recommendation of Preferred Land Use Alternative City Council Meetings (Spanish translation services provided):
• May 18, 2021 and May 25, 2021 – Preferred Land Use Map Review and Endorsement of the Preferred Land Use Map
Outreach via Email:

Email blasts sent to general plan update email list (1,332 subscribers):
• May 12, 2021, Review the draft preferred land use map. Join us at City Hall. - https://conta.cc/3uHcPCE
• April 23, 2021, Review preferred land use map. Join us at Planning Commission - https://conta.cc/3awOzeg
• April 16, 2021, The Preferred Land Use Alternative is here! Complete the survey. https://conta.cc/2Qxk68C
• March 23, 2021, General Plan Advisory Committee Meeting 3/25. Join us to review the survey results and more! – https://conta.cc/2OXlhOo
• February 24, 2021, We need YOU to help guide the future of TO. Take the Land Use Alternatives survey Today! – https://conta.cc/2NEfRHt
• February 19, 2021, Let’s Chat About Maps Tomorrow! – https://conta.cc/3bm6u6X • February 11, 2021, Let’s Chat About Maps Tonight. Ask us about the future of Thousand Oaks from home! – https://conta.cc/3jNr7go
• February 3, 2021, Did you miss us last night? Recording of Community Workshop Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update – https://conta.cc/3atoT1u City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-7
• January 22, 2021, Let’s Talk Land Use in T.O. Community Workshop Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update – https://conta.cc/3qMeMeF
• January 12, 2021, Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update - GPAC Meeting and Community Workshop – https://conta.cc/3sj21cR
• November 12, 2020 and sent to non-openers on November 15, 2020, Let’s chat about parks and open space! – https://conta.cc/35q51ec
• October 15, 2020, Next Week: Arts & Culture and Thousand Oaks. Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update – Upcoming Opportunity to Participate! – https://conta.cc/3j4jiRe • September 22, 2020, This Week: Sustainability and Thousand Oaks (corrected links!) Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update - Upcoming opportunity to participate! – https://conta.cc/2FTOyEN
• September 17, 2020, Next Week: Sustainability and Thousand Oaks Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update - Upcoming opportunity to participate! – https://conta.cc/3mAIbau • August 18, 2020 and sent to non-openers on August 20, 2020, Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update - August 20th GPAC Meeting Agenda is Available Now! – https://conta.cc/2Q8yzEw
• August 5, 2020 and sent to non-openers on August 9, 2020, Join us for the next General Plan Update meeting on Safety & Resilience! – https://conta.cc/3kiqWti • July 15, 2020 and sent to non-openers on July 18, 2020, Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update - Upcoming Meeting! – https://conta.cc/2Wo7hO5
• June 25, 2020 and sent to non-openers on June 29, 2020, Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update - News & Updates – https://conta.cc/3duZzaR
• May 21, 2020 and sent to non-openers on May 25, 2020, Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update - Spring Newsletter – https://conta.cc/36ptyij
• February 28, 2020, Thousand Oaks 2045 General Plan Update – https://conta.cc/2veJUMN • January 15, 2020, Upcoming Community Forum and Opportunities to Get Involved – https://conta.cc/35STq4h
• December 6, 2019, GPAC to Discuss Housing – https://conta.cc/2COrnXD Mentions in City’s CityScene Newsletters (1,549 subscribers):
• May 2021 - https://conta.cc/3eVDmWe
• March 2021 – https://conta.cc/3q2U5dv
• February 2021 – https://conta.cc/3cvsDlv
• January 2021 – https://conta.cc/3pX7y6T
• September 2020 – https://conta.cc/2YSB96C
• June 2020 – https://conta.cc/2yUbRv9
• May 2020 – https://conta.cc/3aZbDzI
• April 2020 – https://conta.cc/2Jt4jky
• March 2020 – https://conta.cc/2VxhGaO
• February 2020 – https://conta.cc/2OivCRn
• January 2020 – https://conta.cc/2S3BiRV
• December 2019 – https://conta.cc/2ru0o1c
Mentions in City’s Economic Development Newsletter (545 subscribers):

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-8
• March 2021 – https://conta.cc/3dUKNxT
• February 2021 – https://conta.cc/39uS58N
• January 2021 – https://conta.cc/38feI0j
• December 2020 – https://conta.cc/3fXKAZM
• March 2020 – https://conta.cc/2I9OLBA
• February 2020 – https://conta.cc/2Um1pEX
Mentions in City’s Sustainability E-Newsletters & Blog (10,300 subscribers):
• February 2021 E-Newsletter -
https://www.toaks.org/Home/Components/News/News/9335/3338?backlist=%2fdepart ments%2fpublic-works%2fsustainability
• January 2021 E-Newsletter – Three articles; this is lead article:
https://www.toaks.org/Home/Components/News/News/9316/3338?backlist=%2fdepart ments%2fpublic-works%2fsustainability
• August 2020 Blog -
https://www.toaks.org/Home/Components/News/News/9236/3338?fsiteid=1 • July 2020 Blog - https://www.toaks.org/Home/Components/News/News/8222/3338 Other mentions:
• March 2021 – California Lutheran University’s message from the Office of the President included information about the General Plan update and was sent to CLU students, staff, and faculty
Other:
• Email sent on February 11, 2021 to 167 homeowners’ associations asking for their involvement
• Email sent on February 11, 2021 to 48 religious organizations asking for their involvement • Email sent on February 25, 2021 to President of Conejo Council of PTAs asking for the PTAs involvement in the land use alternatives.
• Email sent on February 16, 2021 to Conejo Valley Unified School District to provide faculty with information on the land use alternatives survey
• Email sent on February 26, 2021 to CLU students in the MPPA program promoting land use alternatives survey
October 2020 Planning Month:
• TO Library passed out 1,000 postcards about planning and the general plan update at curbside • City staff recorded two videos of reading children’s books about city planning for Storytime • TO Library shared information on their website and social media Social Media including Twitter, Instagram, and General Plan Update Website (through March 2021):
• Twitter: 293,000 impressions, 3,165 profile visits, 279 followers, 120 mentions City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-9
• Instagram: 6,655 reach, 1,600 engagement, 653 followers, 1,700 video views • Toaks2045.org website: 37,352 page views, 13,000 unique viewers, top 2 visitor pages (homepage and land use), two biggest traffic sources (direct - 11,753 and social – 2,619) Advertisements:
• Paid ads in The Acorn to promote Community Forum: Size 3x7 in color on January 16, 2020 and January 23, 2020
• Paid ads in The Acorn to promote all engagement opportunities for land use alts phase: Size 4x10 in color on January 21, 2021, February 11, 2021, and February 18, 2021 • Paid for ads on our social media general plan accounts (see separate attachment for General Plan Social Outreach)
Public inquiries via email:
• Responded to more than 350 emails from the public since the beginning of the General Plan update.

Review and Adoption of Housing Element (September 2021- Present) The draft 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element reviewed by Planning Commission on September 27, 2021 with the community feedback incorporated was submitted to the State Department of Housing and Development on October 27, 2021. On December 3, 2021, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) completed review of the draft Housing Element and concluded that the draft element addressed many statutory requirements; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law. On January 10, 2022 the Planning Commission reviewed and made a recommendation to approve the Housing Element to City Council. The City Council adopted the 2021-2029 Housing Element on January 25, 2022. With the HCD comments addressed, the Housing Element was submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for Certification on February 7, 2022.

On April 7, 2022, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) completed review of the City Council adopted Housing Element, and provided a letter indicating that the adopted Housing Element met most statutory requirements; however, additional revisions were necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law. The revised Housing Element was made available public review for a period of seven days from January 24, 2023 to January 31, 2023, prior to resubmittal to HCD. During the public review period of the 6th cycle housing element, the City received and accepted comments from a coalition of community and housing activists. Comments received from stakeholders are documented in the next four pages.

The City also maintains a website dedicated to the General Plan Update that includes all meeting materials and summaries for each of the community engagement activities at https://www.toaks2045.org/communityengagement.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-10
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-11
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-12
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 A-13
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 B-1
Appendix B: Evaluation of the 2014-2021
Housing Element
This chapter contains an analysis of the effectiveness of the 2014-2021 Housing Element, appropriateness of goals and the progress in implementing programs for the previous planning period as required by California Government Code Section 65588(a). The chapter also includes an evaluation of the appropriateness of continuing the 2014-2021 Housing Element goals and programs. Findings from this analysis and evaluation have guided development of the Housing Action Plan described in Section 6: Housing Plan.

I. PROGRAM EVALUATION
The 2014-2021 Housing Element contained five primary goals and 14 implementing programs consistent with California housing element law and priorities expressed by the Thousand Oaks community, including input received from the City Council, Planning Commission, and City staff.

The five primary housing goals were:
• Goal 1: Provide a wide range of housing opportunities for persons of all income levels. • Goal 2: Provide housing opportunities for persons with special needs. • Goal 3: Maintain and improve the existing housing stock of the City by reducing housing deterioration.
• Goal 4: Preserve existing affordable housing opportunities. • Goal 5: Provide equal access to housing regardless of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, age, or disability.

Table B-1Table B-1 summarizes the programs contained in the previous Housing Element along program objectives, accomplishments, and the appropriateness of continuing with the previous programs and policies for this Housing Element Update.

Table B- 2Table B- 2 presents the City’s progress in meeting the quantified objectives from the previous Housing Element. The 5th Housing Cycle RHNA allocated 192 units to the City of Thousand Oaks, but an additional 63 units in the very low and low income categories were carried over from the 4th Housing Cycle for a total of 255 units of quantified objectives included as part of the Housing Element Annual progress reporting to HCD.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023 B-2
II. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON ADDRESS SPECIAL NEEDS
The City of Thousand Oaks has been successful in addressing the housing and supportive service needs of the special needs groups through its partnership with nonprofits, such as the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura, Many Mansions, and County of Ventura. Between 2013 and 2021, the City funded the construction, acquisition and/or rehabilitation of 392 affordable units, primarily for special needs groups.

The City, through its CDBG and Social Service Endowment Fund (SSEF), continues to address homeless needs and supportive housing and service needs of seniors and persons with disabilities.

The City will carry forward this tradition in the 2021-2029 Housing Element planning period.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 B-3
Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation Program Objective and
Time Frame Accomplishments Continued Appropriateness
Goal 1: Provide a wide range of housing opportunities for persons of all income levels.

1. Work with local non-profits, such as Habitat for
Humanity, by identifying potential development
sites and financial assistance if appropriate to
provide additional affordable homeownership
opportunities.
1 Low income unit Discussions took place with many local nonprofits to identify potential sites, including Many Mansions, Area Housing Authority of the
County of Ventura, and Habitat for Humanity
of Ventura County.

The City recently purchased 2 parcels, totaling
approximately 4.07 acres on the corner of
Hillcrest and Erbes for $10 million using
general funds and Housing Successor funds
for 100% affordable housing. The RFP/Q
process for selecting development will be
complete by Winter 2021.

Program was consolidated with
other 2014-2021 programs as
Program 6 in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan.

2. Manage the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to
finance the creation, preservation or rehabilitation
of affordable housing. Where feasible, give
priority to housing projects that address the
needs of extremely low income households.

Identify and fund
project(s) based on
available funding.

On- going
The City discussed potential projects and
availability of financial assistance from the
Affordable Housing Trust Fund with non-profit
affordable housing developers. In 2014, the
City assisted the Area Housing Authority
Garden View Terrace Apartments (56 units)
Phase II with $1,000,000 in City Housing Trust
Fund and a $1 million match with the State of
California (CA) Housing and Community
Development (HCD) Housing Trust Fund.

The City recently conducted RFP/Q for project
HOME key and selected 2 nonprofit affordable
developers for permanent supportive housing
and year-round shelter.

Program was consolidated with
other 2014-2021 programs as
Program 6 in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 B-4
Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation Program Objective and
Time Frame Accomplishments Continued Appropriateness

3. Update the inclusionary housing in-lieu fee and
non-residential development linkage fee based
on changes in economic conditions.

Monitor and update
fees when
warranted.

City staff submitted an analysis of economic
conditions to City Council on August 14, 2014,
which recommended no changes to the in-lieu
and linkage fees. In 2015, the City put its
Inclusionary Housing (IH) and nonresidential
linkage fee update on hold because of
questions related to the legal status of these
fees (BIA v City of San Jose case in US
Supreme Court). Though the US Supreme
County upheld Residential Inclusionary Zoning
in 2016, the updates remained on hold until
after General Plan Update commenced.

Program was consolidated with
other 2014-2021 programs as
Program 6 in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan.

4. Continue to cooperate with agencies that
gather information concerning housing needs,
including the Census Bureau.

On-going In collaboration with Ventura County and other Ventura county cities, the City spent $20,376
in CDBG funds to hire a consultant to
complete the regional Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI). The
City also collected information from the
Census Bureau website and cooperated with
the Census Bureau and other agencies
throughout the planning period.

Collecting data is routine function
and is not included in the 2021-
2029 Housing Element as a
housing program.

Goal 2. Provide housing opportunities for persons with special needs.

5. Assist efforts of local agencies and non-profits to
implement the 10-Year Plan (2008-2017) toEnd
Homelessness in Ventura County.Continue to
provide funds to social service agencies that help
prevent homelessness and assist the homeless. City
to continue to collaborate with Ventura County and
participate with Conejo AffordableHousing
Workgroup on homeless prevention strategies.

On-going The City participated in the Ventura County
Continuum of Care (CoC) during the planning
period and the City Manager has been a
board member since 2017.

In 2014, the City participated in the Conejo
Affordable Housing Workshop hosted by the
County of Ventura.

Program was updated and
renamed Program 8 in the 2021-
2029 Housing Plan.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 B-5
Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation Program Objective and
Time Frame Accomplishments Continued Appropriateness
Between 2014 and 2020, the City provided
$311,320 in CDBG and Social Service
Endowment Funds (SSEF) to 4 local nonprofits for services to 7,318 Thousand Oaks residents who are homeless or at-risk of
becoming homeless.

In addition, in 2020, the City budgeted
$650,000 of CDBG-CV funds towards
Homeless Public Services related to COVID19 and expended over half of the budget which has severed so far 125 Thousand Oaks
residents who are homeless or at risk of
homeless. The City general funds granted 13
nonprofit applicants $10,000 each for a total of
$130,000 to serve the Social services
Emergency relief program which provides
funding to support local non-profits providing
COVID relief to Thousand Oaks Residents.

The City general funds also offered a Rental
Assistance Program to those residing in
Thousand Oaks meeting certain criteria. 168
households benefited from this program,
which provided $3,600 - $5,600 in rent relief
per household with total payments of
$878,000.

6. Continue allocating funding to local non-profit
groups thataddress the housing needs of special
needs households, including disabled and elderly
households.

Subject to available
funding
In years 2014 through 2020, the City provided
$452,369 in CDBG and SSEF funds to assist
22,745 disabled and elderly households.

Through the CDBG and SSEF, the City
continued to allocate funding to local nonprofit
Program is appropriate and will be
continued in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan as Program 9.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 B-6
Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation Program Objective and
Time Frame Accomplishments Continued Appropriateness
groups that address the housing and
supportive service needs of special needs
groups through the Annual Action Plan
process. Groups that benefited from the City’s
support include:
• Many Mansions
• Habitat for Humanity
• Lutheran Social Services
• Senior Concerns
• Westminster Free Clinic
In 2015, the City granted $114,291 in Housing
Assistance Program for Seniors (HAPS)
funding to assist 382 low-income disabled and
senior households with utilities. Effective
January 2018, the City Utility Assistance
Program (UAP) provides utility bill credits to
low-income Thousand Oaks utility customers
through the water and wastewater penalty
interest and late fee revenue funds. UAP has
an annual budget of $240,000 and has
capacity to serve 800 eligible water customers
and 1,600 eligible wastewater customers. As
of September 2021, the UAP program serves
573 wastewater customers and 503 water
customers.

Goal 3: Maintain and improve the existing housing stock of the City by reducing housing deterioration

7. Assist housing groups in securing local and
other sources offunds for the acquisition and
rehabilitation of multi-family structures for
On-going as
opportunities arise
From 2014 to 2018, the City granted $
149,317.92 to 11 low-income homeowners
for health and repairs.

Program is appropriate but was
updated and divided into Program
11 (Mobile Home Rehabilitation)
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 B-7
Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation Program Objective and
Time Frame Accomplishments Continued Appropriateness
affordable housing. Coordinate with non-profit
housing developers to identify opportunities and
provide supportwith applications as necessary.

From 2017, the City granted $890,291.57 in
CDBG funds to Habitat for Humanity and
Senior Alliance for empowerment (SAFE) and
rehabilitated 108 units primarily benefiting the
elderly and disabled. Both programs currently
are focused on mobile home rehabilitation.

From 2014 to 2020, the City approved a multifamily rehabilitation grant in the amount of $1,538,072 to the non-profits Area Housing
Authority of the County of Ventura and Many
Mansions for affordable housing at:
• Shadow Hills Apartments (100 units)
• Esseff Village Apartments (50 units)
• Florence Janss (62 units)
• Los Arboles Apartments (43 units)
• Richmond Terrace Apartments (26 units)
• Glenn Oaks Apartments (39 units)
• Bella Vista (72 units)
Most recently, the City allocated CDBG
funding to the: Los Arboles Apartments (12
units) owned by the Housing Authority of the
County of Ventura and Shadow Hills
Apartments (100 units) owned by Many
Mansions.
and Program 12 (Rental Housing
Rehabilitation) in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan.

8. Continue to require inspection of resale
housing as a methodto encourage maintenance
of the housing stock.

On-going The City streamlined the administrative resale research process by providing electronic
reports during the planning period and
Program remains appropriate
and will be continued in the 2021-
2029 Housing Plan as Program
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 B-8
Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation Program Objective and
Time Frame Accomplishments Continued Appropriateness
conducts inspections for open and not final
permits only when requested. Specifically, the
City on average annually performed 1,800
record searches and 380 inspections for open
and not final permits under the City’s
Residential Resale Program.
10 to pursue the program as
funding permits.

Goal 4. Preserve existing affordable housing opportunities.

9. Contact the property management company or
property owner annually to evaluate threat of
conversion to market rate. If threatened with
conversion to market rate: 1) help property owner
find alternate sources of funding to preserve the
affordable units; 2)facilitate sale of property to an
affordable housing developer/ operator to preserve
affordable units; 3) work with Area Housing
Authority to obtain project based rental assistance
(Section 8) certificates for qualified residents and
4) consider funding assistance fromCity to prevent
conversion tomarket rate.

Contact Conejo
Futures owner
annually:
90 Units
Conserved
Conejo Future, developed with a Declaration
of Restrictions recorded on March 6, 1974,
limits the use of the property as affordable
senior housing. Conejo Future continues to
apply to receive annual HUD Section 202 and
Section 811 for Section 8 Housing Assistance
Payments. The owners of Conejo Futures
operated the property under a contract with
HUD throughout the planning period.

Program was consolidated with
other 2014-2021 programs as
Program 13 in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan.

10. Monitor affordable housing units in the City’s
affordable housing program to ensure ongoing
affordability for the period of time required by
State and Federal law.

On-going The City monitored affordable housing units
throughout the planning period.

Program was consolidated with
other 2014-2021 programs as
Program 13 in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan.

11. Assist housing groups in securing local and
other sources offunds to extend existing
affordability covenants to existing multi-family
housing.

On-going as
opportunities arise
In 2016, opportunities and funding became
available to implement this program during the
planning period for the Many Mansions’
Shadow Hills apartments through bond
refinancing and extending affordability to
2070.

In May 2016, City owned project was sold to
Program was consolidated with
other 2014-2021 programs as
Program 13 in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 B-9
Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation Program Objective and
Time Frame Accomplishments Continued Appropriateness
Many Mansions as Schillo Gardens LLC.

Many Mansions used California Tax Credit
Allocation Committee (CTCAC) 4% Bond
financing in 2016 for the acquisition and
rehabilitation of Schillo Gardens to extend the
affordability for 55-years or 2071.

12. Encourage affordable housing providers to
give priority to the housing needs of persons with
disabilities, including, butnot limited to, persons
with developmental disabilities.

On-going The City encouraged affordable housing
providers to give priority to special needs
households. The Thousand Oaks City
Manager has been a board member of the
Ventura County Regional Continuum of Care
(CoC) since 2017. In 2017, the CoC awarded
$108,321 to Thousand Oaks-based Many
Mansions for Permanent Supportive Housing
(PSH) at Richmond Terrace Apartments and
Esseff Village Apartments. The residents
assisted by Permanent Supportive Housing
(PSH) have a disability. The CoC continued to
award funds to Many Mansion for its PSH
through 2020.

Program was consolidated with
other 2014-2021 programs as
Program 6 in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan.

Goal 5. Provide equal access to housing regardless of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, age, or disability.

13. Continue to contract with appropriate outside
agencies such as Housing Rights Center in
collaboration with Ventura County and other local
jurisdictions to provide fair housing services.

On-going The City allocated CDBG funds contracting
with the Housing Rights Center in
collaboration with Ventura County and other
Ventura County cities to provide fair housing
services during the planning period.

Program is appropriate and will be
continued in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan as Program 14.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 B-10
Table B-1: 2014-2021 Housing Element Program Evaluation Program Objective and
Time Frame Accomplishments Continued Appropriateness

14. Provide fair housing information throughout
the City via the City’s website, city hall, libraries
and community centers. Host an annual fair
housing seminar to increase public awareness of
fair housing laws and services.

On-going Notices and information is posted on the City’s website, Thousand Oaks Television (TOTV),
Ventura County Star, Thousand Oaks Acorn,
public counter and provided to Thousand
Oaks stakeholders throughout the planning
period. The Housing Rights Center also
conducted free fair housing seminars
annually.

Program is appropriate and will be
continued in the 2021-2029
Housing Plan as Program 14.

Table B- 2: 2014-2021 Progress in Achieving Quantified Objectives New Construction Rehabilitation Conservation
Objective Accomplished Objective Accomplished Objective Accomplished Extremely Low-Income 23 15 0
0 201 20
Very Low-Income 61 16 0 201 20
Low-Income 58 2 0 501 50
Moderate-Income 36 267 0 0 0 0
Above Moderate-Income 77 397 0 0 0 0
Totals 2552 697 0 0 901 90
1 Conejo Futures Apartments
2 Combined RHNA includes a 63 dwelling unit carryover of “Lower- Income” category from the prior RHNA cycle.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023 June 2023 C-1
Appendix C: Sites Inventory
The detailed assumptions and methodology for the residential land inventory summary presented in Section 3 (Resources) are provided below and summarized in Table C- 1Table C- 1 through Table C18Table C- 18.

The land inventory includes pipeline projects (housing developments that have been approved but not permitted), pending projects, and vacant and underutilized sites with potential for development.

Table C- 1: Land Inventory Summary to Meet RHNA
Income Categories
Very Low Low Moderate Above
Moderate Total
RHNA 735 494 532 860 2,621
Potential ADU 5436 74111 102153 4228 360240
Pipeline 2216 94 104
1,103
1,015
1,229
1,129
Pending 09 32 0 388481 420522
Total CREDITS
76 58
61 237
00 163
12 106
1,533
612
1,524
2,009
1,88
1,891
Remaining Need
659
77 674
257
94 369
420
426 0
1,285
39141
Remaining Need
(Combining Very Low and Low)
916
71 968
369
420
426
0 1,285
39141
All Sites 1,527 614 154 2,295
Mixed-Use (20-30 du/ac) 1,239 453 78 1,770
Mall Sites (20-30 du/ac) 288 137 0 425
Neighborhood Medium-High (20-30 du/ac) 0 24 0 24
Neighborhood Low-Medium (6-10 du/ac) 0 0 76 76
Shortfall/Surplus Combined2 +611559 +245188 +154 1,010901 Shortfall/Surplus % 6657.7% 66.444.1% N/A

78.664.6
%

1. Remaining need based on sum of remained feed of 916968 low and 369426 moderate units, not the difference between total credits and total RHNA.

2. Shortfall/surplus calculated based on remaining RHNA need.

I. CREDITS TOWARD RHNA
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023 June 2023 C-2
Since the RHNA uses June 30, 2021 as the baseline for growth projections for the Housing Element planning period, jurisdictions may count the number of new units with issued building permits or certificates of occupancy since June 30, 2021 toward their RHNA. This section describes the applicability of the credits, while latter sections discuss the availability of land to address the remaining RHNA.

With the anticipated ADUs, approved projects and projects under review the City can accommodate 2,0091,891 units (i.e., total credits). The City must accommodate the remaining RHNA of 1,2853911,394 units with vacant and nonvacant sites that are appropriately zoned and have near-term development potential

1. Potential ADUs
Pursuant to State law, the City may credit potential ADUs to the RHNA requirements by using the trends in ADU construction to estimate new production. Between 2018 and 20221, the City issued 225122 building permits and issued 11657 final building permits for ADUs. Assuming this trend continues, the City expects to produce around 4530 ADUs per year (Table C- 2Table C- 2) or 360240 ADUs over the eight-year planning period.

Table C- 2: ADU Permits Issued 2018-2020
Year Permitted Completed
2018 14 0
2019 17 15
2020 31 15
2021 60 27
2022 103 59
Total 225122 11657
Average 4530 2314
Sources: City of Thousand Oaks, Annual Progress Reports, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, and 2022.City of Thousand Oaks, JuneDecember 20232022.

Note: Averages rounded down.

The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has issued guidance on the anticipated affordability of ADUs in order to determine which RHNA income categories they shoul d be counted toward. Table C- 1Table C- 1 shows the affordability level of assumed income categories for the expected 360240 ADU units based on the SCAG Regional Accessory Dwelling Unit Affordability Analysis.
15 2. Pipeline and Pending Projects
15 The affordability assumptions for Ventura County are 15 percent extremely low, 0 percent very low, 30.9 percent low, 42.5 percent moderate, and 11.6 percent above moderate. https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/adu_affordability_analysis_120120v2.pdf?1606868527 City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023 June 2023 C-3
Table C- 3Table C- 3Table C- 3 Table C- 3 summarizes pending residential applications being processed as of June 2023December 2022. These projects include pipeline projects (approved but not permitted as of June 2023December 2022) and pending projects (projects pending review including prescreen applications for General Plan Amendments approved by City Council to change nonresidential designations to residential land uses). These projects would include 225 extremely low/very low income units, 126 low income units, 104 moderate-income units, and 1,4911,496 above moderate units for a total 1,6491,651 units in pipeline and pending projects. The number and income category of the income-restricted (affordable) units in these pending residential applications are based on the Development Agreements that are required as part of the prescreen applications for residential General Plan Amendments. Table C- 4Table C- 4 shows a detailed list with project information for pipeline and approved projects.

Table C- 3 : Summary of Pipeline and Credit Units
Project Status Units by Income Category
EL/ VL Low Mod Above Mod Total
Pipeline 2216 94 104 1,103015 1,229
1,129
Pending 09 32 0 388481 420
522
Total Pipeline and Pending 225 126 104 1,491
1,496 1,64951
Table C- 4: Pipeline and Pending Projects
Project Address Project
Type
Units by Income Category
EL VL Low Mod Above
Mod Total
325 & 391 Hampshire Rd (Kmart) Apts 0 0 50 4 366 420
Baxter Way Apts 0 16 18 0 230 264
Daylight/1872 Newbury Rd Apts 0 0 26 0 192 218
Ardalan Lynn & Kelley Rd SFD’s 0 0 0 0 10 10
The Lakes/2200 E. TOB Apts 0 0 0 0 165 165
88 Long Court Apts 0 6 0 2 65 73
Shapell Apts 0 0 0 4 23 27
2821 Los Robles Rd Condo 0 0 0 0 4 4
111 Jensen Ct Apts 0 0 0 0 5 5
2080 E Hillcrest Dr SFD's 0 0 0 0 9 9
Banafsheha/1583 El Dorado Dr SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
2831 Lynnview St SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
Turnkee/4920 Read Rd SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
Fang/2140 Speck Ln SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
Fang/2124 Speck Ln 1583 0 0 0 0 1 1
Poppen/715 Paige Ln SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
385 Skyline Dr SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023 June 2023 C-4
Table C- 4: Pipeline and Pending Projects
Project Address Project
Type
Units by Income Category
EL VL Low Mod Above
Mod Total
2430 Alice Ann Rd SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
4755 Golf Course Dr SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
1137 Oak Mirage Pl SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
273 S Skyline Dr SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
1816 Los Feliz Dr Apts 0 0 0 0 16 16
136 N Oakview Dr Apts 0 0 0 0 4 4
1879 Collingswood SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
4960 Read Road SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
1757 Classic Rose Ct SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total Pipeline (Entitled but Not Permitted) 0 2216 94 104 1,103015 1,229129 AMGEN/2150 W. Hilcrest Dr Apts 0 0 30 0 303 333
Martens/3190 Los Robles Rd Twnhm 0 0 0 0 2 2
Allied Mgmt Group/Erbes and north of Copa de
Oro
Apts 0 0 0 0 30 30
1730 Los Feliz Drive Apts 0 0 2 0 22 24
88 Long Court* Apts 0 6 0 0 69 75
Shapell* Apts 0 3 0 0 23 26
59 Moody Ct * Twnhm 0 0 0 0 4 4
187 Flittner Circle SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
1651 Lynn Rd SFD 0 0 0 0 19 19
2595 W Kelly Rd SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
2131 High Knoll Rd SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
4398 Rayburn St SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
253 S Ventu Park Rd SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rios Ranch SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
395 Sherwood Ct SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
Allen SFD 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total Pending (In Planning Process) 0 09 32 0 388481 420522 Total (Pipeline and Pending) 0 225 126 104 1,4916 1,64951 * Prescreen applications for General Plan Amendments, Zone Change and entitlements to allow residential.

Availability of Credit Units During Planning Period
Table C- 5Table C- 5 below shows the status of projects and expected timing of credit units as of December 2021. All pipeline projects are expected to be constructed or have permits in 20232.

Pending projects may have a longer timeline but can be reasonably expected to be completed during the 2021-2029 planning period since current development timelines have not been found to be a constraint to development.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023 June 2023 C-5
Table C- 5 : Remaining Approvals and Expected Timing for Credit Units Pipeline Project Address Remaining Approvals/Expected Timing Highgate Estates, Highgate Road Permits have been issued for two homes in 11/21 and they are under construction. The third home is in plan check and expected to start construction in 2023.2.
2821 Los Robles Rd Project is in plan check and issuance of building permits is expected in 2023.2. 111 Jensen Ct Project is in plan check and issuance of building permits is expected in 20232.
2080 E. Hillcrest Dr. Developer received a time extension and issuance of building permits is expected by 2023.

Banafsheha/1583 El Dorado Dr. Project is in plan check and issuance of building permits is expected in 20232. 2831 Lynnview St. Project is in plan check and issuance of building permits is expected in 20232. 1649 Hauser Cir Project is in plan check and issuance of bBuilding permits iswere expectedissued in June 2022.

Turnkee/4920 Read Rd Project is in plan check and received a time extension. Issuance of building permits is expected in 20232.

Fang/2140 Speck Ln Project received planning entitlements and expected to submit to plan check.

Project is allowed automatic extension per City Council Covid resolution.

Fang/2124 Speck Ln Project received planning entitlements and is expected to submit to plan check.

Project is allowed automatic extension per City Council Covid resolution.

Poppen/715 Paige Ln Project is in plan check and received a time extension. Issuance of building permits is expected in 20232.
955 Brossard Dr Project is in plan check and issuance of bBuilding permits iswere expectedissued in June 2022.
385 Skyline Dr Project is in plan check and issuance of building permit is expected in 2022.

Khodadadi/21 La Cam Rd Issuance of building permits is expected in 20232.

Sandefer/Skyline & Willow Ln Issuance of building permits is expected in 20232.

Miller Ranch 1706 Following the July 1, 2021 planning period, building permits were issued and the project is currently under construction.

Miller Ranch 1714 Following the July 1, 2021 planning period, building permits were issued and the project is currently under construction.

Miller Ranch 1722 Following the July 1, 2021 planning period, building permits were issued and the project is currently under construction.

Miller Ranch 1690 Following the July 1, 2021 planning period, building permits were issued and the project is currently under construction.

Miller Ranch 1698 Following the July 1, 2021 planning period, building permits were issued and the project is currently under construction.

Pending Project Address Remaining Approvals/Expected Timing AMGEN/2150 W. Hillcrest Dr Prescreen application approved on April 27, 2021 and is pending per submittal of formal planning entitlement.

Ardalan/Lynn & Kelley Rd Following the July 1, 2021, planning period, planning entitlements were approved on July 26, 2021.

Daylight/1872 Newbury Rd Following the July 1, 2021, planning period, planning entitlements were approved on November 9, 2021.

Martens/3190 Los Robles Rd Issuance of planning entitlements is expected in 2022.

Scribner/515 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd Prescreen application approved on September 14, 2021 and is pending per submittal of formal planning application.
88 Long Court Prescreen application approved on April 27, 2021, and is pending per submittal of formal planning application.

Shapell Prescreen application approved on January 28, 2020 and is pending per submittal of formal planning application.
59 Moody Ct Following the July 1, 2021, planning period, planning entitlements were approved on September 14, 2021.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023 June 2023 C-6
Table C- 5 : Remaining Approvals and Expected Timing for Credit Units Pipeline Project Address Remaining Approvals/Expected Timing Cohan/3801 Maurice Dr Prescreen application approved in 10/2019 and is pending per submittal of formal planning application.

The Lakes/2200 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd
(165 apts market rate)
Following the July 1, 2021 planning period, planning entitlements were approved on November 30, 2021.

II. AVAILABILITY OF LAND TO ADDRESS REMAINING RHNA
NEEDS
Government Code Section 65583.2(c) requires that local jurisdictions determine their realistic capacity for new housing growth by means of a parcel-level analysis of land resources with the potential to accommodate residential uses. The analysis of potential land resources to accommodate new housing growth considered physical and regulatory constraints, including lot area and configuration, environmental factors (e.g. slope, sensitive habitat, flood risk), allowable density, and other development standards such as parking requirements and building height limits.

1. Shortfall of Adequate Sites
Based on the City’s current General Plan and zoning regulations, there are not sufficient available sites to accommodate the remaining RHNA of 1,2851,394 units, the majority of which are very low and low income units. Furthermore, a buffer of sites capacity is needed to address the no-net-loss requirements (SB 166). However, the City is in the process of updating its General Plan 2045 and on May 25, 2021, City Council endorsed a Draft Preferred Land Use Map that creates a new mixed-use designation, Mixed-Use, that allows for both residential and commercial development at a minimum density of 20 du/ac to a maximum density of 30 du/ac. The Mixed-Use land Use designation provides for a combination of neighborhood-serving goods and services and multi-family residential in a mixeduse format (vertical or horizontal) or as stand-alone projects including 100 percent residential.

Buildings with this designation will be designed to be walkable with wide sidewalks, active frontages, and minimal setbacks from the back of the sidewalk. Allowed uses would generally consist of retail, restaurants, commercial uses (such as banks or real estate offices), residential in multi-family buildings, or attached single-family units (e.g., townhomes).

The sites inventory relies primarily on sites that will be redesignated as Mixed-Use. The sites inventory also uses sites in the Neighborhood Medium-High and Neighborhood Low-Medium designations, which have density ranges of 20 du/ac – 30 du/ac and 6 du/ac to 10 du/ac, respectively. The housing sites inventory includes both vacant and nonvacant (underutilized) land with the potential for additional housing during the Sixth Housing Element cycle. The analysis of nonvacant properties included only those properties with realistic potential for additional development or “recycling”, in light of existing uses on the site; prevailing market conditions; recent development trends; and/or expressed interests in housing development from property owners or developers. Explanation of the methodology and assumptions for estimating the development capacity of vacant sites is provided below.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2023 June 2023 C-7
Prepared under the assumption that the EndorsedDraft Preferred Land Use Map will be adopted, and that new housing growth will primarily rely on the recycling of commercial sites to mixed-use, the 6th Cycle Sites Inventory is made up of three types of sites:

1. Mixed-Use Sites, including Village Centers

2. Mall Sites

3. Neighborhood Sites (Medium-High and Low-Medium)
Table C- 6: Land Inventory Summary to Meet RHNA
Income Categories
Very Low/ Low Moderate Above
Moderate Total
Remaining Need
659
968
257
426 3690
1,285
1,394
All Sites 1,527 614 154 2,295
% of Remaining Need 213157.7% 238.9144.1% N/A 178.564.6% Mixed-Use (20-30 du/ac) 1,239 453 78 1,770
Mall Sites (20-30 du/ac) 288 137 0 425
Neighborhood Medium-High (20-30 du/ac) 0 24 0 24
Neighborhood Low-Medium (6-10 du/ac) 0 0 76 76
Shortfall/Surplus Combined +611559 +245188 +154 +1,010901 Shortfall/Surplus % 5766.7% 66.444.1% N/A 7864.6%
With the anticipated EndorsedDraft Preferred Land Use Map, the City estimates an additional 2,295 units can be accommodated by Mixed-Use Sites, Mall Sites, and Neighborhood Sites, including 1,527 lower income units. Together all of these zones make up a total of 125.75 acres.

Table C- 7: Acreage of Rezoned Sites
Acreage Potential Total Potential Lower Income Units
Mixed-Use Sites 90.48 1,770 1,239
Mall Sites 21.39 425 288
Neighborhood Sites 13.88 100 0
Total 125.75 2,295 1,527
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-8
Figure C- 11: Sites Inventory Map - Overview
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-9

2. Methodology and Guiding Assumptions for Sites
Mixed-Use Sites
One of the key strategies in drafting Land Use alternatives through the General Plan Update process was to revitalize underutilized land (including the malls, older shopping centers, and Thousand Oaks Boulevard) with a diverse mix of uses including residential. The engagement process led to the identification of areas with a series of strategies to be implemented over the next several decades. in the City which should be preserved from change to the greatest extent feasible (areas of stability), and where new development could occur (focus areas of change). Site selection focused primarily on areas Priority Areas, the Downtown Core, and of change and Village Centers identified through the General Plan Update process (Figure C- 2Figure C- 2).

Figure C- 2: Priority Areas of Change and Village Centers City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-10
The implementation strategies associated with each of these areas is as follows:
• Priority Areas (#12): Create a diversity of housing types and affordability levels, including mixeduse and multifamily development. Within the priority areas, create a new downtown core for the City near Civic Arts Plaza (#6) and revitalize underutilized land and opportunity areas (including malls, older shopping centers, and Thousand Oaks Boulevard) with a diverse mix of uses including residential (#7)
• Village Centers (#9): Create village centers throughout the community that provide retail and services, gathering places, and multifamily housing.

General Plan discussions identified sites along Thousand Oaks Boulevard and other nonvacant sites with the potential for redevelopment based on regional and local trends. On July 18th, 2019, HR&A Advisors, Inc. (HR&A) led a focus group meeting on economic development as part of the City of Thousand Oaks General Plan Update. The event focused on soliciting feedback from key stakeholders on existing conditions and identifying local economic strengths, weaknesses, oopportunities, and threats, as well as begin the conversation on necessary incentives or partnerships to produce the scale of development that is desirable to Thousand Oaks.

The focus group identified an oversupply of aging and auto-oriented retail, especially along Thousand Oaks Boulevard, as an issue. Focus group discussions emphasized the that retailers and shopping centers will need to focus on creating an enhanced consumer experience through the curation of tenants, likely with a heavy focus on food and beverage and placemaking. Furthermore, retail with strong visibility to major transportation corridors and proximity to other land uses is likely have greater resiliency. Thousand Oaks Boulevard was also identified as an opportunity area to create a centralized node of activity could be a place for entertainment, adding amenities younger generations desire, and attract younger residents.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-11
The Draft Preferred Land Use Map designated a large portion of Thousand Oaks Boulevard (from Hillcrest Drive to Duesenberg Drive, areas of change B and C in ) as Mixed-Use. According to the Draft General Plan, the Mixed-Use designation allows for multi-story, multi-use infill development in potential growth areas of the City, such as Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Rancho Conejo, and two mixeduse Village Centers. For the Sixth Cycle sites inventory, Mixed-Use sites along Thousand Oaks Boulevard were identified if they were at least 30 years old and/or with an improvement-to-land value (ILV) ratio of less than one.

This query identified older areas with potential for redevelopment and returned 47 potential sites.

Based on the location of the sites with the two filters, staff identified adjacent sites that have the potential to be consolidated with the identified sites. The City considered constraints like steep slopes and opportunities like underperforming/underused commercial centers, as well as high-turnover rates.

In some instances, parcels that met at least one of the criteria but the property owners have expressed interest in redevelopment are also included in the inventory. The City also considered existing uses at recently redeveloped sites in the City or region as a factor to determine site suitability. In the region, uses that are being replaced on nonvacant sites include, sites with motels and existing commercial retail, office buildings, parking lots, single-family residences, schools, and industrial and agriculture uses. Section 3 Redevelopment TrendsRedevelopment Trends describes these trends in detail. The sites inventory tables at the end of this section show parcel-by-parcel analysis of the sites (before 1991, ILV<1, existing use, and criteria for selection).

In addition to individual sites and underperforming centers along Thousand Oaks Boulevard, other commercial centers with potential for mixed-use redevelopment due to the changing face of retail and need for housing were identified as opportunities for redevelopment through the General Plan outreach process. These centers were referred to as “Village Centers.” (Figure C-2). Village Centers are neighborhood commercial centers that offer a mix of daily goods and services for residents, employees, and visitors to easily access. These centers are smaller and more walkable than other commercial centers and are located in or near residential neighborhoods. The Endorsed Draft Land Use Mapalternative designated twothese Village Centers as a mix of Mixed- Use (Janss and Moorpark and Avenida de los Arboles and Erbes), which allows the addition of residential. These village centers Low and Commercial Neighborhoods. This then allows some areas to add residential uses while others remain commercial. Two of these Village Centers (Janss and Moorpark and Avenida de los Arboles and Erbes) were re-designated as Mixed-Use on the endorsed Land Use map and are included in this inventory, Site L/LL and Site M, respectively. The next section (Redevelopment Trends) discusses the redevelopment potential in Sites L/LL and M in detail.

Of the 41 additional sites identified, 28 sites are developed with structures that are at least 30 years old and eight sites are neither less than 30 years old nor have an improvement ratio of less than one. For the sites that did not meet either criterion, a reason for selection was given. In the Village Center sites (Sites L, LL and M), ILV often exceeded 1.0 but the City did not consider this a disqualifying factor.

The nature of these existing uses in Village Centers (shopping centers) often yields high ILV. 16 For example, a typical shopping center usually has an ILV of about 2.5 to 3.50. However, given the current nationwide trend of E-ceCommerce, a high ILV has increasingly become a financial burden to 16 Improvement-to-Land Value (ILV) ratio is calculated by dividing the County Assessor estimates of improvement value by the land value for a parcel.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-12
property owners. High ILV means high property taxes regardless of whether the spaces can generate adequate revenues or rents.

Figure C-3 shows the sites by consolidation ID/cluster, to illustrate reasons for selection. Mixed-Use sites have a density range of 20 du/ac to 30 du/ac. A summary of the Mixed-Use sites with potential for redevelopment is provided in Table C- 8Table C- 8. Potential units were calculated using the minimum allowable density (rounded down) and, as shown, could result in approximately 1,770 units.

Table C- 9Table C- 9 Table C- 9: below also shows a parcel-by-parcel analysis of the Mixed-Use sites, including potential units and reason for selection.

Table C- 8: Mixed-Use Sites Summary
Criteria Parcels Acreage Potential Units
More than 30 years old AND ILV ratio <1.0 47 34.65 672
At least 30 years old, ILV ratio not <1.0 28 34.92 685
Not at least 30 years old, ILV ratio <1.0 5 1.07 20
Neither 30 years old NOR ILV ratio <1.0 8 19.83 393
Total 88 90.47 1,770

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-13
Figure C- 3: Mixed-Use Sites by Consolidated ID Overview City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-14
Table C-98 shows the details of the selection characteristics for non-vacant Mixed-Use sites. The selection characteristics used to determine the suitability of non-vacant sites include:

1. Property owner or developer interest

2. Building age is at least 30 years

3. Improvement to Land Ratio is of less than 1.0, indicating the land is worth more than the structures on site.

4. Existing uses are the similar types of uses being recycled in the City or Region (retail, commercial, industrial, office, school) 4A: SFH with redevelopment potential to at least double existing unit number 4B: Vacant Retail

5. Parking Lot

6. Traditional retail along Thousand Oaks Blvd, identified as an area of changea Priority Area in General Plan discussion

7. “Village Centers”17 in Draft Draft Land Use Element
17 Underperforming commercial centers with potential for mixed-use redevelopment due to the changing face of retail and need for housing.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-15
Table C- 9: Mixed-Use Sites
Site
ID APN Address Yr Built
ILV
ratio Acres Cons.ID
Owner
ID
Before
1991?
ILV
< 1.0 Lower Mod
Abv
Mod Total
Units
Existing
Use Notes
Criteri
a for
sel.
1 6670290215 2665 W Hillcrest
Dr
2009 1.4 7.43 61 No No 148 148 Ross/
PetSmart site
Owner expressed interest 1
2 5250052555 148 W Hillcrest
Dr A
1988 0.6 1.32 A 2 Yes Yes 13 13 26 Chase bank Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,6
3 5250052575 130 W Hillcrest
Dr B
1990 1.53 6.5 A 3 Yes No 65 64 129 Restaurants/
retail
Largest store in building
(PETCO) permanently
closed. In underutilized
shopping center, three of
five parcels in site and
meet two filters.
2,4,6
4 5250020365 139 W Thousand
Oaks Blvd.
1989 0.1 1.71 A 1 Yes Yes 17 17 34 Demolished
former
restaurant
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
5 5250052465 147 W Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1978 0.25 0.82 A 1 Yes Yes 8 8 16 Vacant
Nursery
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
6 5250052485 0 *Unassigned 1990 3.13 2.02 A 1 Yes No 20 20 40 Parking In underutilized older shopping center, three of
five parcels in site and
meet two filters.
2,5,6
7 6690050065 419 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1969 0.79 0.82 57 Yes Yes 16 16 Retail Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0.
2,3,4,6
8 6690201020 528 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1978 0.07 0.35 B 4 Yes Yes 3 3 6 Car wash Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
9 6690201160 556 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1960 0.66 0.49 B 5 Yes Yes 4 5 9 Permanently
closed
restaurant
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4B,6
10 6690201110 99 Long Ct 1981 1.84 0.56 BB 6 Yes No 5 6 11 Office Building Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,4,6
11 6690201125 75 Long Ct 1970 1.56 0.62 BB 7 Yes No 6 6 12 Dental clinic Older building, near area with redevelopment
potential
2,4,6
12 6690262190 595 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1968 0.78 0.31 C 12 Yes Yes 6 6 Liquor store Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
13 6690262200 611 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1968 2.35 0.18 C 15 Yes No 3 3 Retail Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
2,4,6
14 6690262210 621 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1969 3.3 0.18 C 16 Yes No 3 3 Retail Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
2,4,6
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-16
Table C- 9: Mixed-Use Sites
Site
ID APN Address Yr Built
ILV
ratio Acres Cons.ID
Owner
ID
Before
1991?
ILV
< 1.0 Lower Mod
Abv
Mod Total
Units
Existing
Use Notes
Criteri
a for
sel.
15 6690262220 661 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1964 0.21 1.08 C 11 Yes Yes 21 21 Rv sales Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
16 6690262440 707 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd B
1991 2.15 0.44 C 18 No No 8 8 Retail Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
4,6
17 6690262430 711 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd A
1991 1.28 0.54 C 18 No No 10 10 Latino market,
adjacent to
parcels with
potential
Older structure, in
shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
4,6
18 6690262280 0 *Unassigned 1994 0.04 0.22 C 8 No Yes 4 4 Retail parking Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ilv requirement
3,5,6
19 6690262290 732 Greenwich
Dr
1947 0.49 0.09 C 8 Yes Yes 1 1 Retail Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
20 6690262300 0 *Unassigned 1989 0 0.02 C 8 Yes Yes 1 1 Retail Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
21 6690262310 750 Greenwich
Dr
1989 0 0.11 C 8 Yes Yes 2 2 Retail Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
22 6690262270 723 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1964 0.7 0.2 C 8 Yes Yes 4 4 Retail Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
23 6690262320 757 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1961 1.03 0.19 C 8 Yes No 3 3 Retail Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
2,4,6
24 6690262330 763 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1961 1.42 0.09 C 8 Yes No 1 1 Retail Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
2,4,6
25 6690262340 758 Greenwich
Dr
1989 0 0.13 C 11 Yes Yes 2 2 Manufactured
Home
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4A,6
26 6690262370 772 Greenwich
Dr
1958 0.49 0.33 C 11 Yes Yes 6 6 Personal
Services
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
27 6690262380 790 Greenwich
Dr
1947 1.44 0.11 C 11 Yes No 2 2 Retail Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
2,4,6
28 6690262360 783 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1948 0.57 0.22 C 11 Yes Yes 4 4 Retail Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
29 6690262350 777 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1960 2.6 0.09 C 9 Yes No 1 1 Dental Office Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
2,4,6
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-17
Table C- 9: Mixed-Use Sites
Site
ID APN Address Yr Built
ILV
ratio Acres Cons.ID
Owner
ID
Before
1991?
ILV
< 1.0 Lower Mod
Abv
Mod Total
Units
Existing
Use Notes
Criteri
a for
sel.
30 6690262390 799 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1986 1.26 0.16 C 17 Yes No 3 3 Retail Older structure, in shopping center with 9
parcels that meet age and
ILV requirement
2,4,6
31 6690273010 821 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1960 1.08 0.76 D 27 Yes No 15 15 Restaurant/
Grocery Store
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria- also
older structure (more than
50 yrs old).
2,4,6
32 6690273020 840 Greenwich
Dr
1954 2.6 0.15 D 24 Yes No 2 2 Two detached
residential
units
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria- also
older structure (more than
50 yrs old).
2,6
33 6690273170 851 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1972 0.5 0.19 D 26 Yes Yes 3 3 Auto shop Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
34 6690273030 874 Greenwich
Dr
1989 0 0.15 D 21 Yes Yes 2 2 Retail parking Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,5,6
35 6690273160 861 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1960 0.15 0.1 D 21 Yes Yes 2 2 Psychic Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
36 6690273040 0 *Unassigned 1992 1.46 0.11 D 19 No No 2 2 Auto repair shop,
underutilized
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria.
4,6
37 6690273150 881 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1994 1.71 0.07 D 19 No No 1 1 Auto repair
shop,
underutilized
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria.
4,6
38 6690273050 898 Greenwich
Dr
1994 0.15 0.12 D 19 No Yes 2 2 Auto shop
parking, no
structures
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria. ILV
<1.0.
3,5,6
39 6690273140 895 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1989 0.23 0.07 D 19 Yes Yes 1 1 Retail parking
/paved
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,5,6
40 6690273060 0 *Unassigned 1994 0 0.12 D 23 No Yes 2 2 Auto shop parking, no
structures
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria. ILV
<1.0
3,4,6
41 6690273130 901 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1969 1.51 0.13 D 23 Yes No 2 2 Auto shop Adjacent to parcel that meets two criteria- also
older structure (more than
50 yrs old).
2,4,6
42 6690273070 910 Greenwich
Dr
1955 0.63 0.12 D 22 Yes Yes 2 2 Single-family
home
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4A,6
43 6690273120 933 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1962 1.63 0.08 D 20 Yes No 1 1 Medical office Adjacent to parcel that meets two criteria- also
older structure (more than
50 yrs old).
2,4,6
44 6700170175 1432 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1956 0.17 5.91 60 Yes Yes 118 118 Building
materials
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0.
2,3,4,6
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-18
Table C- 9: Mixed-Use Sites
Site
ID APN Address Yr Built
ILV
ratio Acres Cons.ID
Owner
ID
Before
1991?
ILV
< 1.0 Lower Mod
Abv
Mod Total
Units
Existing
Use Notes
Criteri
a for
sel.
45 6700043020 1320 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1961 0.37 0.14 E 28 Yes Yes 2 2 Auto shop Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
46 6700043120 1350 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1968 0.35 0.31 E 31 Yes Yes 6 6 Tire shop Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
47 6700043130 0 *Unassigned 1927 0.14 0.16 E 29 Yes Yes 3 3 Parking, with undefined
structure
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,5,6
48 6700043240 0 *Unassigned 1989 0.03 0.36 E 32 Yes Yes 7 7 Vacant, unpaved
parking
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,5,6
49 6700043270 1302 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1958 0.49 0.2 E 30 Yes Yes 4 4 Personal
Services and
Retail
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
50 6700043080 60 Cunningham
Rd
1965 1.97 0.58 E 33 Yes No 11 11 Trailer repair
shop
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria; older
structure (>50 years old).
2,4,6
51 6700160260 1489 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1967 0.54 1.33 F 34 Yes Yes 26 26 Medical/retail/
services
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0.
2,3,4,6
52 6700160130 1429 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1963 2.01 0.72 F 34 Yes No 14 14 Vacant Office
Building
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria; older
structure (>50 years old).
2,4B,6
53 6700160270 1459 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1969 3.78 1.86 F 34 Yes No 37 37 Medical/retail/
services
Adjacent to parcel that
meets two criteria; older
structure (>50 years old).
2,4,6
54 6700181245 1846 Oakwood
Dr
1958 0.87 0.41 G 37 Yes Yes 4 4 8 SFH Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4A,6
55 6700181050 102 Oakwood Dr 1956 3.36 0.17 G 36 Yes No 1 2 3 SFH Adjacent to parcel that meets two criteria, older
home (>50 yrs old).
2,4A,6
56 6700181190 0 *Unassigned 0 0 0.11 G 35 No Yes 1 1 2 Vacant, next to house
Vacant, ILV<1.0, adjacent
to other parcels with
redevelopment potential.
3,6
57 6700181380 0 *Unassigned 0 0 0.5 G 38 No Yes 5 5 10 Vacant, next to house, sign
for sale next to
it
Vacant, ILV<1.0, adjacent
to other parcels with
redevelopment potential.
3,6
58 6700182100 145 Oakwood Dr 1941 0.05 0.37 H 39 Yes Yes 3 4 7 Home Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4A,6
59 6700182110 81 Oakwood Dr 1958 0.07 0.34 H 39 Yes Yes 3 3 6 Home Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4A,6
60 6700182200 1850 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1970 0.52 0.5 H 39 Yes Yes 9 9 Roofing
company
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
61 6700192100 1735 Los Feliz Dr 0 0 0.53 I 40 Yes Yes 10 10 Vacant Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,6
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-19
Table C- 9: Mixed-Use Sites
Site
ID APN Address Yr Built
ILV
ratio Acres Cons.ID
Owner
ID
Before
1991?
ILV
< 1.0 Lower Mod
Abv
Mod Total
Units
Existing
Use Notes
Criteri
a for
sel.
62 6700192165 1741 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1966 0.82 0.74 I 41 Yes Yes 14 14 Retail/services Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
63 6710140080 2797 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1964 0.25 4.58 59 Yes Yes 91 91 Retail/services
/RV park
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0.
2,3,4
64 6710150090 2979 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1950 0.23 0.49 55 Yes Yes 9 9 Retail/kitchen
appliance
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0.
2,3,4,6
65 6710194150 2983 Crescent
Way
1940 0.04 0.54 56 Yes Yes 10 10 Paint shop +
two homes
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0.
2,3,4
4A, 6
66 6710160050 3157 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1965 0.05 1.6 J 44 Yes Yes 31 31 Car
rental/sales
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
67 6710160060 3167 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1950 0.88 0.22 J 42 Yes Yes 4 4 Car
rental/sales
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,5
68 6710160080 3185 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1958 0.12 0.22 J 42 Yes Yes 4 4 Automotive
Repair Shop
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
69 6710160090 3183 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1989 0 0.26 J 42 Yes Yes 5 5 Vehicle
storage
parking
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,5,6
70 6710160200 3175 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1989 0 0.67 J 42 Yes Yes 13 13 Car rental
parking
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,5,6
71 6710160070 3177 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1952 1 0.22 J 42 Yes No 4 4 Automotive
Services
Adjacent to parcels that
meet two criteria. Older
structure >50 yrs old.
2,4,6
72 6710160110 3209 E Thousand
Oaks Bl Blvd 1
1989 1.02 1.69 J 45 Yes No 33 33 Automotive
Parts Sales
and Service
Adjacent to parcels that
meet two criteria. Older
structure >30 yrs old.
2,4,6
73 6710160120 3245 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1962 0.81 0.36 J 43 Yes Yes 7 7 Automotive
services
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
74 6710171190 3173 Los Robles
Rd
1960 0.43 0.26 K 47 Yes Yes 2 3 5 Home Over 30 yrs old and ILV ratio <1.0
2,3,4,6
75 6710171180 3163 Los Robles
Rd
1989 3.6 0.26 K 46 Yes No 2 3 5 Home Adjacent to parcel that meets two criteria. Older
home (> 30 yrs old).
2,4A,6
76 6710171130 3234 E Thousand
Oaks Blvd
1933 0.12 1.25 58 Yes Yes 25 25 Retail/car
services
Over 30 yrs old and ILV
ratio <1.0.
2,3,4,6
77 6770300035 1330 N Moorpark
Rd
2006 1.51 5.31 L 48 No No 106 106 Vacant Retail,
and
commercial
services
(temporary)
Village center, corner
parcel next to site with
potential, large vacancy,
City identified as
underutilized shopping
area
4B,7
78 6770300045 1332 N Moorpark
Rd
1972 0.73 2.42 L 48 Yes Yes 48 48 Home Goods Village center identified during GPU as having
large redevelopment
potential.
2,3,4,7
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-20
Table C- 9: Mixed-Use Sites
Site
ID APN Address Yr Built
ILV
ratio Acres Cons.ID
Owner
ID
Before
1991?
ILV
< 1.0 Lower Mod
Abv
Mod Total
Units
Existing
Use Notes
Criteri
a for
sel.
79 6770300055 1382 N Moorpark
Rd
1989 1.66 2.32 L 49 Yes No 46 46 CVS Village center identified during GPU as having
large redevelopment
potential. Old shopping
area (over 30 yrs old).
2,4,7
80 6770300075 1388 N Moorpark
Rd
1977 2.48 4.06 L 50 Yes No 81 81 Restaurants Village center identified during GPU as having
large redevelopment
potential. Old shopping
area (over 30 yrs old).
2,4,7
81 6770300165 1440 N Moorpark
Rd
1982 6.16 0.92 L 50 Yes No 18 18 Bank of
America
Village center identified
during GPU as having
large redevelopment
potential. Old shopping
area (over 30 yrs old).
2,7
82 6770300195 620 E Janss Rd 1983 2.18 1.61 LL 50 Yes No 32 32 Retail and services
Village center identified
during GPU as having
large redevelopment
potential. Old shopping
area (over 30 yrs old).
2,3,4,7
83 6770300125 612 E Janss Rd 1990 0.78 1 LL 51 Yes Yes 20 20 Healthcare office
Village center identified
during GPU as having
large redevelopment
potential.
2,3,4,7
84 5700090335 1934 E Avenida
De Los Arboles
1996 1.58 5.02 M 54 No No 50 50 100 Next to DMV,
ACE hardware
Adjacent to parcels that
meet two criteria in
shopping center identified
as having redevelopment
potential during GPU
4,7
85 5700090345 2000 E Avenida
De Los Arboles
#A
1989 1.35 8.42 M 52 Yes No 84 84 168 Parking and
retail
Identified as potential for
redevelopment during
GPU. Over 30 yrs old and
ILV ratio <1.0.
2,4,5,7
86 5700090355 0 *Unassigned 1989 1.53 0.28 M 52 Yes No 3 2 5 Vons grocery Adjacent to parcels that meet two criteria in
shopping center identified
as having redevelopment
potential during GPU.

Older structure.
2,7
87 5700090245 2048 E Avenida
De Los Arboles
#B
1980 0.89 0.85 M 52 Yes Yes 8 8 16 Vons grocery Identified as potential for redevelopment during
GPU. Over 30 yrs old and
ILV ratio <1.0.
2,3,7
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-21
Table C- 9: Mixed-Use Sites
Site
ID APN Address Yr Built
ILV
ratio Acres Cons.ID
Owner
ID
Before
1991?
ILV
< 1.0 Lower Mod
Abv
Mod Total
Units
Existing
Use Notes
Criteri
a for
sel.
88 5700090045 2072 E Avenida
De Los Arboles
1998 2.07 0.91 M 53 No No 18 18 Next to DMV,
Chase/Starbu
cks in parcel
Adjacent to parcels that
meet two criteria in
shopping center identified
as having redevelopment
potential during the GPU.
7 Total 1,239 453 78 1,770:

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-22
Figure C- 4: Mixed-Use Sites by Consolidated ID- Detailed Aerial View City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-23
Note: Shaded areas denote common ownership.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-24
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-25
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-26
Note: Shaded areas denote common ownership.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-27
Note: Shaded areas denote common ownership.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-28
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-29
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-30
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-31
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-32
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-33
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-34
Note: Shaded areas denote common ownership.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-35
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022C-36
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-37
Mall Sites
The identified Oaks and Janss Mall parcels will all be designated Mixed-Use under the PreferredEndorsed Land Use Map, endorsed by City Council. These Malls, like many malls across the US, and especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, has suffered from underutilization and store closures. In the discussions for the General Plan 2045 update, the City, residents, and mall owners have expressed interest in redeveloping the space with a mix of uses. In an effort to balance housing and employment growth, as well as future retail needs, the City has assumed only a portion of the mall (approximately 18 percent) will be redeveloped into residential uses. Seven parcels were selected from the southern end of the mall, where the parcels are mostly used as parking, with the exception of three detached buildings. One of the buildings is currently unoccupied and cumulatively, the three buildings take up less than one acre of the 21 acres in the area. Table C- 10Table C- 10 shows the breakdown of the parcels by use, acreage, and potential units. Since these units will be designated Mixed-Use, the potential capacity was calculated by using the minimum allowable density of 20 du/ac. Table C11Table C- 11 at the end of this section also shows a detailed parcel-by-parcel analysis that includes the age, ILV ratio, and reason for selection. Two of the three structures are more than 50 years old.

Overall, re-development of a portion of The Oaks Mall property could result in approximately 275 additional units and re-development of a portion of the Janss Mall parking lot could result in approximately 150 units, for a combined total of 425 units.

Table C- 10: The Mall Sites - Parcels by Existing Use
Use Parcels Acreage Potential Units
Vacant 2 0.23 4
Parking 2 10.85 216
Parking + Structure 3 10.31 205
Total 7 21.39 425
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-38
Table C- 11: Mall Sites
APN Address Yr
Built
ILV
Ratio Acres Before 1991?
ILV
<1.0 Lower Mod Above Mod Units Existing Use Reason for selection 5250052365 158 W Hillcrest Dr 2011 1.546 2.54 No No 25 25 50 Out pad
restaurant in
mall area but
not part of
larger
Southern end of mall, mostly parking,
equivalent to 17% of mall area.
5250052605 0 *Unassigned 0 0 0.12 N/A Yes 1 1 2
Vacant lot,
small portion
adjacent to
larger parcel
Southern end of mall, mostly parking,
equivalent to 17% of mall area.
5250052525 0 *Unassigned 1979 0.185 3.34 Yes Yes 33 33 66 Parking at end of mall structure
Southern end of mall, mostly parking,
equivalent to 17% of mall area.
5250052475 150 W Hillcrest Dr 1979 3.224 4.96 Yes No 50 49 99 Out pad
restaurant
mostly excess
parking
Southern end of mall, mostly parking,
equivalent to 17% of mall area.
5250052595 0 *Unassigned 0 0 0.11 N/A Yes 1 1 2
Vacant lot,
small portion
adjacent to
larger parcel
Southern end of mall, mostly parking,
equivalent to 17% of mall area.
5250052475 150 W Hillcrest Dr 1979 3.224 2.81 Yes No 28 28 56 Out pad
restaurant,
mostly parking
Southern end of mall, mostly parking,
equivalent to 17% of mall area.
5250030470 33 W Hillcrest Dr 2000 2.40 7.51 No No 150 150 Janss
Marketplace
mostly parking,
Restaurant out
pad building
Large underutilized parking space
near Oaks Mall. Potential for
redevelopment. This site is only a
portion of the entire parcel. The
acreage of the parking only (7.51
acres) was used to calculate the
potential units. ILV however, is based
on the entire parcel and therefore
includes areas that are not part of
this yield assumption. As a result,
the ILV may be artificially high.

Total 288 137 0 425
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-39
Figure C- 5: Mall Sites Parcels
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-40
Neighborhood Sites
Both Neighborhood Medium-High and Neighborhood Low-Medium were identified using the criteria: at least 30 years old, not condo or townhomes, and ILV is less than 1.0. This query returned two sites, one in Neighborhood Medium-High (RV storage) and one in Neighborhood Low-Medium (vacant). As shown in Table C- 12Table C- 12, these two sites have a capacity for 100 units. Unit capacity is based on the minimum allowable density in each designation (6 du/ac and 20 du/ac, respectively).

Table C- 12: Neighborhood Sites
Parcels Acreage Potential Units
Neighborhood Medium-High 1 1.21 24
Neighborhood Low-Medium 1 12.67 76
Total 2 13.88 100
Figure C- 6: Neighborhood Sites

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-41
Table C- 13: Neighborhood Sites
APN Address Yr
Built
ILV
Ratio Acres Before 1991? ILV <1.0 Designation Lower Mod Above Mod Total
Units Notes Reason For Selection
6710140050 2740 LOS FELIZ 1935 0.533 1.21 yes yes
Neigh Med
High (20
du/ac)
24 24 RV storage
Over 30 yrs old, ILV
ratio <1.0, no
condo/townhouse
6600050125 0 *UNASSIGNED N/A 0 12.68 yes yes
Neigh Low
Med (6
du/ac)
76 76 Vacant
Over 30 yrs old, ILV
ratio <1.0, no
condo/townhouse
Total 0 24 76 100
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-42

3. Redevelopment Trends
In accordance with Assembly Bill 1397, the following discussions are included to demonstrate the feasibility of redevelopment of non-vacant sites addressing the lower-income RHNA allocation in the City. The City is largely built-out with limited vacant areas to identify for future housing.

The element includes housing sites on nonvacant land but expects that they will be redeveloped based on recent redevelopment trends. In past few years, City has not received proposals for 100 percent commercial projects and high vacancies in existing retails make 100 percent commercial projects less likely in the City. According to the City’s Demographic and Economic Profile and Existing Conditions, Thousand Oaks appears to have an oversupply of retail space as traditional retailers face a changing retail landscape and increased regional competition. The report found that between 2017 and 2018, Thousand Oaks saw retail vacancies increase from 5.1 percent in 2017 to 6.2 percent in 2018. Thousand Oak's retail vacancy rate is the second highest among the neighboring clusters.18 The North Cluster was the only area with a higher retail vacancy rate at 7.7 percent, which has increased

2.7 percent compared to 2017. The East Cluster’s vacancy rate remained unchanged between 2017 and 2018, at 4.3 percent, while Camarillo’s vacancy rate, which is currently the lowest of the clusters, decreased from 4.2 percent to 2.8 percent between 2017 and 2018. Economic development focus group participants noted that the vitality of traditional retail has declined in Thousand Oaks and there is an oversupply of aging retail centers, in particular along Thousand Oaks Boulevard. Many of the sites selected are located in older or underutilized retail centers along Thousand Oaks Boulevard as well as along Moorpark Road and Avenida de Los Arboles. Relatively slow population growth, and strong but less significant household wealth than the East Cluster has made it hard for Thousand Oaks to attract new retail tenants.

Even in mixed-use developments there are examples of projects with surplus retail. Mixed-use development is currently only allowed in the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan (SP 20) area along Thousand Oaks Boulevard. Recent development trends in the mixed-use areas have resulted in projects that include primarily residential with a small amount of commercial because it is currently required by SP 20 on properties that front on Thousand Oaks Boulevard. Examples include redevelopment of the former Lupe’s Restaurant that was replaced with 36 residential units and 4,980 square feet of commercial. Currently, the residential units are fully occupied while the commercial space is not. Another recent example is the project known as “299” on Thousand Oaks Boulevard that was formerly an auto dealership and repair garage where a 142-unit apartment complex with 10,000 square feet of commercial is under construction. Recent commercial activity has been largely limited to renovations of existing structures in the mixed-use areas or, as indicated redevelopment of commercial into residential dominated mixed-use. Given the trend and the high market value of residential development, construction of 100 percent commercial on mixed-use zoned properties is not likely. SP 20 will require updates for consistency with the updated General Plan with the intent to allow 100 percent residential on most parcels except at key intersections where a commercial component will be required. Details are yet to be established.

With adoption of the General Plan update, a new mixed-use designation will be expanded outside of the SP 20 boundaries to areas such as, the Oaks Mall, Janss Marketplace and certain neighborhood commercial centers where the property owners have expressed interest in flexible zoning that would 18 Clusters refer to groupings of neighboring cities formed for the analysis. The North cluster includes Moorpark and Simi Valley, while the Eastern Cluster consists of Westlake Village, Agoura Hills, and Calabasas.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-43
allow residential development. In addition to the General Plan update that is well under way, a comprehensive update to the Zoning Code will follow to ensure it complies with the new General Plan land use designations recently endorsed by the City Council (May 2021). In April 2022, Objective Development Standards for residential development were adopted as part of the Zoning Code.

Efforts are also moving forward to adopt Objective Development Standards and initiate updates to the City’s Inclusionary Housing Program. These efforts are focused on facilitating and incentivizing the construction of all types of residential development. Additional actions that support the assumption that residential or mixed-uses will occur in the sites selected include: the ongoing Inclusionary Housing ordinance amendments which will likely encourage housing development.

The City has also seen examples of redevelopment in non-vacant sites. Table C- 14Table C- 14 shows nine pipeline (approved) and pending (under review) projects that involve redevelopment. In addition to recent multi-family projects within the City, this Housing Element looked at nearby development in the neighboring cities to determine recent trends for nonvacant site redevelopment. (Table C15Table C- 15 ) shows recent representative projects showing nonvacant redevelopment trends in the surrounding areas of Oxnard, Simi Valley, and Ventura.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-44
Table C- 14: Examples of Redevelopment Project
Status Project Existing Use Zoning Existing GP Size Project Type Parcel Consol.

Total
Units
VL/ L
Units
Density
(du/ac)
Pipeline 2821 Los Robles Rd SFH RPD-12U Medium Density Res 0.29 Condos 1 4 0 13.65 Pipeline Martens/3190 Los
Robles Rd SFH RPD-15U High Density Res 0.18 Triplex 1 3 0 16.67 Pipeline The Lakes/2200 E.

TOB Parking Lot SP-11 High Density Res 7.58 Apts 1 165 0 21.77 Pipeline Baxter Way Parking Lot M-1 to SP23 High Density Res 8.8 Apts 1 264 34 30 Pipeline Daylight/1872
Newbury Rd School C-2 to SP21 MU/High Density Res 9.67 Hotel/Apts 3 218 26 31 Pipeline 325 & 391 Hampshire
Rd
Retail (Kmart)
and Parking
Lot
C-1 to SP22 MU/High Density Res 11.1 Apts 2 420 50 38
Pending 1651 Lynn Rd SFH R-E-1AC Low Density Res 4.28 SFH 1 19 0 4.44 Pending 88 Long Court Office Bldg SP-20 High Density Res l 1.86 Apts 1 75 6 40.32 Pending AMGEN/2150 W.

Hilcrest Dr Office Bldg C-3 MU/High Density Res 8.2 Apts 1 333 30 40.61 City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-45
Table C- 15: Recent Redevelopment Projects in the Region City Address Existing Uses Size
(acres) Projects Parcel Consol.

Unit
Count
Density
(du/ac)
Oxnard 761 South C Street Office building and
large parking lot 1.7 Mixed-use, 5- story building 1 175 102 Oxnard 2714 Vineyard Ave Elementary school 9.1 Condominium apartments 1 164 18 Oxnard 705 N. Oxnard Blvd Motel and retail
restaurant 2.1 3-story 100% affordable housing 2 44 21
Oxnard 5536 & 5582
Cypress Rd
Commercial agriculture
and existing housing 5.2 100 percent affordable and special needs housing 2 150 29 Oxnard 184 North H Street Underutilized parking
area

1.5 Single-family housing 2 15 10
Oxnard 5600 Cypress Road Agriculture facilities 1.1 30 affordable special needs apartments and 77 bed farmworker housing 2 30 27
Oxnard 5451-5497 Cypress
Road 20 SF residences 4.9 2-story apartment complex 20 72 15 Simi Valley Belwood Center Retail and commercial NA Tapo/Alamo Mixed-Use (271 units, 84 lower inc) 40 Simi Valley Patricia Avenue SF homes NA Apartment, townhomes, and senior apartments multiple 53 Simi Valley Sycamore Landing
Apartments Former City offices NA project includes 99 units for sr. HH multiple 99+ Ventura Bell & Olive MU Apts Industrial Lot NA Demolish existing building and construct 4 duplex buildings 2 8 19.5
Ventura Maple Court Office Building NA Abandoned office space. Developer will be doing a small density bonus to get to 350 units. 350
Ventura Logue Light Industrial- NA Construct 125 condo with commercial 1 125 21.2 Ventura Orchid Gardens Single Family
Residence NA SFR conversion to 18-unit apartment 1 18 30 Ventura 940 E Santa Clara St
Quadplex Office Building NA New quadplex on developed parcel with an existing commercial building 1 4 26.6 Ventura The Lodge Parking /Rec Center NA Convert existing commercial space to Boutique B&B - 18 units 1 18
Ventura Hemlock Apartments Single Family
Residence NA SFR convert to 23 Apartments 1 23 41.1
Ventura 935 E Front St 91 Commercial/Industrial NA Industrial complex w/ office building convert to MU apty with commercial 1 1 29.5
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-46
Ventura Samet Apartments Service- Car Wash NA Demolition of an existing carwash; Construction of 19 residential units 1 19 79.2
Ventura Retail & Parking NA Two buildings containing in total one commercial space and 9 apartments with a lot merger multiple 9 23.1 Ventura Pacific Wave
Building Service- Auto repair NA Automobile repair shop replaced with Three-story mixed use building 1 28.6 Ventura Thompson Cruz Commercial NA Demolition of an existing commercial building and new construction of an apartment building, 1 38.7
Ventura Laurel Courts Commercial NA
Land with four existing structures replaced with MU
consisting of 6,595 sf commercial and 44 residential
units
1 44 36.7
Ventura The Lofts Industrial Light NA Demolition of an existing industrial building and the construction of a new apartment building 1 83.3
Ventura The Point Commercial LotVacant NA
Duplex and adjoining vacant land replaced with MU2,400 sf ground floor commercial; 1,000 sf coworkspace; 110 dwelling units 2 110 126.4
Ventura SRO @ 45 S.

California St Office Building NA
Demolish an existing 1-story office building replace
with a 4-story structure of approximately 10,000 sf for a mix of uses (retail and 27 SRO)
1 122.7
Ventura Front Street MU Retail/Office- Stores
and offices NA
Office/retail building replaced with 4-story mixed use; 46 market rate condominiums + 5 affordable; 6,384 sf
ground floor commercial
1 46 56.0
Ventura Downtown Triangle
Site Commercial NA Commercial space and adjacent parking replaced with Multifamily apartment development 1 231 19 Ventura Kellogg St
Apartments Industrial Buildings NA Demolition of industrial buildings and construction of two residential apartment buildings 1 30 38 Ventura Rothman On
Sheridan Wy
Single Family
Residence NA 10 unit Apartment building on existing SFR 1 10 34 Sources: Port Hueneme 6th Cycle Revised Housing Element October 2022, Simi Valley Drat 6th Cycle Housing Element 2021, and Ventura 2021-2029 Housing Element Technical Background Report, November 2022.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-47
Characteristics of Redeveloped Sites
Throughout the SCAG region, jurisdictions have experienced declining demand for retail space, especially outdated shopping malls that were designed to have large surface parking surrounding the mall structures. Such model of shopping center design represents an inefficient use of land that does not allow the property owners to realize the highest and best use of valuable real estate. The COVID19 pandemic further accelerated the decline of retail because of increased online shopping, following an upward trajectory that has been apparent for more than a decade. Similarly, the redevelopment of office buildings for residential uses, either as adaptive reuse or reconstruction, is an emerging trend , as increasingly employers are accommodating remote working. COVID-19 proves that remote working can be an efficient work environment and facilitates significant cost savings for rents and other expenses associated with operating an office. As seen in Table C- 15 Table C-15, In the region, uses that are being replaced in Thousand Oaks and neighboring on nonvacant sites include older shopping centers, sites with motels and existing commercial retail, older office buildings, parking lots, older single-family residences, and agriculture uses. In some cases, sites with single-family homes are being replaced with apartments and townhomes. In Ventura, a majority of projects did not use lot consolidation though other jurisdictions projects consolidated at least two lots for their projects.

Achieved density of the projects in surrounding areas ranged from 19.5 to 126 but averaged 44 density units per acre. There are a number of 100 percent affordable projects on sites that consolidated small lots around 0.5 acres or less, such as the projects at 705 N. Oxnard Boulevard, Cypress Road, and N.

Hayes Street.

The housing sites identified for the Oaks Mall and Janss Marketplace properties consist of the parking lot areas due to the greater feasibility for development of housing with the Housing Element cycle.

Though the Oaks Mall and Janss Marketplace owners both have expressed an interest in greater flexibility with the proposed mixed-use designation and opportunity to develop residential, housing identified in the sites inventory did not rely on the conversion of existing mall uses, butuses but assumes only infilling of parking lot areas with intensified uses. . In addition to these the Oaks Mall and Janss Marketplace sites in Thousand Oaks, Rreuse of shopping centers, such as the like Oaks Mall and Jansns Marketplace Janssetplace similar to those in Simi Thousand is an emerging trend regionally. Examples include:19
• 325 & 391 Hampshire Rd (Thousand Oaks)- Redevelopment a Kmart and parking to 420 apartment units at a density of 38 du/ac.
• Pacific View Mall (Ventura) - The mall has been struggling due to the declining retail market that further deteriorated due to COVID-19. The property owner has expressed interest in redevelopment the mall with residential uses. Ventura City’s affordable housing advocates – Homes for All – identifies the mall as an opportunity site. • The Willows (Ventura) – Redevelopment of Toys R Us into 306 units and 10,000 square feet of commercial and clubhouse uses at a density of 38 du/ac. • Thompson Courts (Ventura)—Demolition of an existing 3,000 square foot commercial building previously used as a gas station and then as a plant nursery and the new construction three-story, 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building.
19 Because many of these projects have already undergone change in ownership or clearance of existing structures on site (and therefore reappraisal of property value), property data on the existing conditions prior to redevelopment is may not be available.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-48
•
• 705 N. Oxnard Blvd (Oxnard) – redevelopment of a motel and retail and restaurant uses to a 100 percent affordable project with 44 units at 21 du/ac.
• Promenade Mall (Rolling Hills Estates): A 6.98 site considered uncompetitive and with a 31 vacancy. The mall also has a high ratio of service uses vs. retail/restaurants compared to other successful commercial centers in the region. The property is available for sale and currently being negotiated to be purchased by a developer. Prospective buyers that have discussed redevelopment with the owner have also discussed an interest in building housing units with city staff. The Sixth Cycle Housing Element considered a potential for 123 units in this site. The Promenade Mall has an ILR of 3.50 but has a high vacancy rate.
• Mountain Gate Plaza (Simi Valley): One-story shopping center including County Public Health Office, pharmacy, and various commercial/retail with large, underutilized surface parking lot considered to have redevelopment potential for 149 units in its Sixth Cycle Housing Element.

This shopping center has an ILV of about 1.60, similar to those in the Thousand Oaks sites inventory.
• Towne Shopping Center (Simi Valley): Parcel with supermarket, restaurant and small retail stores with underutilized parking lots and interior parcels with a potential for 125 units in its Sixth Cycle Housing Element.

Redondo Beach Plaza (Redondo Beach): A 9.25-acre shopping center that includes a Vons grocery store is included in the Housing Element for 175 units. The owner of the shopping center demonstrated experience and current works throughout California (e.g., Pinole, Novato) in infilling shopping centers with grocery stores for additional housing without displacing existing uses.

The site inventory includes non-vacant sites along Thousand Oaks Boulevard from Westlake Boulevard to Wilbur Road, which contains 1.6 million square feet of retail exhibiting a vacancy rate of 3.1 percent and buildings with leases (366,000 square feet) have a vacancy rate of 13.3 percent.

Office space within this section of Thousand Oaks Boulevard consists of 797,000 square feet with a vacancy of 11 percent and buildings with leases (408,000 square feet) have a vacancy rate of 21.4 percent.20
Non-vacant sites along Hillcrest Drive from Hodencamp Road to Borchard Road contain 1.5 million square feet of retail (including the Oaks Mall) with 3.2 percent vacancy and buildings with leases (350,000 square feet) have a vacancy rate of 13.9%. Office space within this section of Hillcrest Drive consists of 555,000 square feet with a vacancy of 39.5 percent and buildings with leases (468,000 square feet) have a vacancy rate of 46.9 percent.21
Village Centers
Housing sites located in Neighborhood Centers (ID Areas L and M) designated Mixed-Use have expressed interest in housing development. Neighborhood Centers, including ID Areas L and M, have exhibited the following vacancy rates utilizing CoStar data analysis platform: Oakbrook Plaza (Erbes and Avenida De Los Arboles, Site M) – 12.2 percent, Conejo Plaza (southeast Janss and 20 Source: CoStar real estate data analysis December 2021. 21 See note 18.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-49
Moorpark, Site L/LL) – 57.1 percent, and Park Oaks Center (northeast corner of Janss and Moorpark) – 10.8 percent. As discussed before, a typical
shopping center has an ILR of about 2.50 to 3.50. Shopping centers that have not undergone any major improvements are also considered outdated and not accommodating the current retail trends.

Site L/LL (Jansns and Moorpark)
The Site L/LL covers seven parcels totaling 12.3 acres. Existing uses include a mix of single story commercial, beauty, retail, restaurants, banking and medical offices with large surface parking areas.

This area and the rest of the existing commercial center will beis designated as a mixed-use Village Center #4 in the City’s General Plan. Village Centers are neighborhood commercial centers that are more walkable and located near existing residential neighborhoods that based on current commercial uses were identified as having mixed-use redevelopment potential and re-designated as Mixed-Use on the eEndorsed Land Use map.

Most of the building structures are at least 30 years old and some are over 40 years old, and have not undergone major renovations.. Existing conditions are ripe for redevelopment. Parcels included have structures that are older than 30 years and have ILVs that are below 3.50 (typical value of shopping centers). While some of the uses include national brands, like Home Goods, CVS, and Bank of America, discount stores and brick and mortar pharmacies have been shutting down in the past few years. For example, site a large portion of Site 70 (about one acre) is currently vacant. This site was formerly a Tuesday Morning Discount Store and hads been vacantcy since at least July 2021. Tuesday Morning announced in May 2023 it was going out of business and closing all stores, making it the second discount store in 2023 after Bed Bath and Beyond also filed for bankruptcy in April 2023.22 In addition, in 2021 CVS announced it would close around 300 stores nationwide in response to the changing of "consumer buying patterns." 23 Site 81 is a Bank of America branch and while not identified as closing soon, bank closures have been on the rise since the pandemic. In 2021, Bank of America had a net closure of 166 branches nationwide.24 The trends toward digital banking lead to more bank closures. Many banks have consolidated local branches and sold off excess properties. For example, the Chase Bank at Site M is vacant. According to a recent article on bankingdive.com, Bank of America’s strategic plan focuses on pursuing new markets such as Milwaukee and New Orleans and to grow its market share with a small number of centers. For every oneevery single new location opens, the bank will close two existing locations. 25 Furthermore. Site 80 had three vacancies as of May 2022 and is mostly parking (three of the five acres are parking). In fact, the two largest parcels included in this site have vacancies.

Nevertheless, the City’s sites strategy does not rely on redevelopment of the entire site, only the parking areas. Therefore, no displacing of existing uses is anticipated. There is a combination of different scenarios that could facilitate redevelopment of the Site L/LL:
22 Valinsky, Jordan (May 2, 2023). Tuesday Morning is going out of business and closing all of its stores. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/02/business/tuesday-morning-closure/index.html 23 Valinsky, Jordan (November 18, 2021). CVS is closing 900 stores. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/18/investing/cvs-storeclosures/index.html 24 Karnes, Bea. (Jan 21, 2022). Bank branch closures hit record: 269 in California shuttered. Patch. https://patch.com/california/san-francisco/bankbranch-closures-hit-record-269-california-shuttered 25 Bankingdive.com, June 14, 2023.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-50
• Tear down and redevelopment;
• Develop the surface parking space while leaving the existing uses intact; • Cluster density on portions of the site; and/or
• Reconfigure the existing structures and expand with residential uses.

While seven parcels were selected in this shopping center due to higher likelihood of redeveloping, it is also possible for other parcels in the area to be redeveloped though the different scenarios stated above. In addition, two of the owners of the sites selected have expressed interest in housing in their properties.

Figure C- 7: Site L/LL Parcel Characteristics
Note: Green and pink shading denote common ownership.

Site ID Yr Built ILV ratio Acres Cons.

ID Owner ID Before 1991? ILV< 1.0 Use as of May 2022
77 2006 1.51 5.31 L 48 No No Pet food store, cleaner,
postal annex/FedEx,
optometrist, nail bar, fish
store, massage envy,
Vacant (largest area
adjacent to boundary with
APN -055)
78 1972 0.73 2.42 L 48 Yes Yes Home Goods
79 1989 1.66 2.32 L 49 Yes No CVS
80 1977 2.48 4.06 L 50 Yes No VACANT, Hair salon
(VACANT), Bead Store
poke store, threading,
juice bar, sandwich,
VACANT, pizza
81 1982 6.16 0.92 L 50 Yes No Bank of America – single
use bank building –
strong trend of
redevelopment in region
for similar uses and BOA
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-51
strategy to close two
existing locations for
every one location opens
in new market area
82 1983 2.18 1.61 LL 50 Yes No Café, Mathnasium,
Carbon Health,
83 1990 0.78 1 LL 51 Yes Yes Lakeside community
healthcare
Site M (Avenida de Los Arboles and Erbes Rd)
Like Site L/LL, Site M iswas identified as part of a Village Center #6 and to be re-designated as a mixed-use in the General Plan. Site M covers five contiguous parcels that total 15.5 acres. This is also a single-story commercial center with a mix of small businesses (site 85) and other larger stores such as ACE Hardware and Vons. Most sites are over 30 years old. T though two were built in the late 1990s, they have not been modernized for over 15 years. The ILVs are also below the typical value for shopping centers (2.50 to 3.50). The sites with a variety of retail stores had multiple vacancies as of May 2022. The development scenarios in Site M are also similar to those in Site L/LLThe site can be redeveloped by infilling excess parking areas without displacing existing uses. However, the multiple vacancies can be conducive to redevelopment or reconfiguration of existing uses. : The development scenarios in Site M are also similar to those in Site L/LL:
• Tear down and redevelopment;
• Develop the surface parking space while leaving the existing uses intact; • Cluster density on portions of the site; and/or
• Reconfigure the existing structures and expand with residential uses.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-52
Figure C- 8: Site M Parcel Characteristics
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-53
Site ID Yr Built ILV
ratio Acres Cons.ID Owner ID Before 1991? ILV< 1.0 Use as of May 2022 84 1996 1.58 5.02 M 54 No No ACE Hardware
85 1989 1.35 8.42 M 52 Yes No Fusion grill, cleaners,
device repair, massage,
hair salon, tutoring, café,
banking, coffee bar,
Goodwill, cigar store,
dental office, UPS store,
restaurant, logix banking,
pizza, and 5 VACANCIES
See also Site LL
discussion on bank
closures.
86 1989 1.53 0.28 M 52 Yes No Vons grocery
87 1980 0.89 0.85 M 52 Yes Yes Vons grocery
88 1998 2.07 0.91 M 53 No No Starbucks, Pizza & Deli,
hair salon, the Chase
space is now VACANT
These development trends of introducing high density residential to commercial centers have been seen in Novato, CA, Pinole, CA, and Bellevue, WA. .

Figure C-9 and Figure C-10 provided several examples densification efforts in commercial centers with a variety of scenarios. In Pinole, CA, an underused retail space was converted to 223 homes while keeping other commercial space. In Bellevue, WA two sites within a commercial space used two strategies, tear down and redevelop into Senior Housing as well as using existing parking to create a mixed-use structure and expand park access.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-54
Figure C- 9: Densification in Pinole, CA
Figure C- 10: Densification in Bellevue, WA
In addition, Redondo Beach has proposed the same redevelopment scenarios in its South Bay Marketplace with a similar composition as Site M in that their South Bay Marketplace Site is made up of contiguous parcels with large parking areas within a larger commercial/industrial center. The existing uses in South Bay Marketplace buildings include large retailers such as Nordstrom Rack and Sprouts Market as well as a large furniture store. According to their Housing Element, tThis 14.68-acre site (the parking lot encompasses 9.25 acres) can potentially accommodate 486 units at 80 percent of the maximum density, utilizing primarily the parking area. The majority of the parking City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-55
for the South Bay Marketplace is on separate parcels from those with existing structures. Therefore, development of residential uses on the parking lots would not require displacement of existing uses on site. They also did not rule out tearing down or repurposing existing structures, such as the Living Spaces into a parking lot (Figure C- 12). As However as stated above, development in Site M is not limited to just the parking lot but could also include tearing down structures, cluster density, and/or reconfiguring existing structures.

Figure C- 11: South Bay Market Place Site- Redondo Beach Source: Redondo Beach Housing Element, 2021-2029.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-56
Figure C- 12: Existing and Potential Reuse- South Bay Marketplace Source: Redondo Beach Housing Element, 2021-2029.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-57

4. Realistic Capacity
Mixed-Use and Mall Sites (Also Mixed-Use)
The City did not add a discount factor in these sites (which also allow for 100 percent nonresidential use) because as part of its site identification and selection process, the City selected sites with a high probability of residential development. The endorsed Preferred Land Use Alternative includes 440 acres of Mixed-Use sites, of which only 112 acres have been selected as part of the RHNA sites inventory. These 112 acres or 95 parcels represent the most likely to be used for mixed-use or standalone residential.

In addition, the City’s capacity estimates for potential RHNA units were conservative since they used 20 du/ac when the maximum allowable density per the Preferred Land Use Alternative is 30 du/ac.

The City used 20 du/ac since it does not currently have trends for mixed-use projects. The Preferred Land Use Alternative used the maximum allowable density and estimated a capacity of 13,189 units in Mixed-Use areas. The potential RHNA capacity in Mixed Use areas (2,195 units combined in MU and Mall Sites) represent only 16 percent of the total capacity estimated by the Land Use Alternative. The City’s 6th Cycle Sites Inventory also includes 470 surplus units (even with the conservative 20 du/ac assumption) as a buffer. In addition, recent redevelopment mixed-use projects in surrounding areas achieved an average density of 60 units per acre and ranged from 23.1 to 126.4 units per acre.

5. Small Sites
Sites smaller than a half-acre in size are deemed inadequate to accommodate housing for lower-income housing unless it is demonstrated that sites of equivalent size and affordability were successfully developed during the prior planning period or other evidence to demonstrate these sites are adequate to accommodate housing for lower-income households. The City’s housing inventory does include some parcels that are less than half an acre but these sites are part of a contiguous block of parcels that have the potential for redevelopment. In Table C- 16Table C- 16 lower income unit sites with sites that do not have common ownership with adjacent parcels and are smaller than 0.5 acres are shown in bold. Only Sites C and J are considered to have lower income unit potential and have parcels smaller than 0.5 acres. Most parcels in Sites C and J share common ownership. For example, Site C is made up of 19 individual parcels ranging from 0.09 to 1.08 acres and is expected to accommodate 85 units affordable to lower-income households. Of these sites, 13 share common ownership in three different owners, as identified by their owner ID 18, 8, and 11. If the parcels smaller than 0.5 acres and without common ownership are not included in the lot consolidation (sites 12,13,14, and 29), this would equate to a loss of 13 lower income units. Similarly, Site J is made up of eight individual parcels, of which five are smaller than 0.5 acres. Five of these eight parcels share common ownership (Owner ID 42). Site 73 is the only parcel in Site J smaller than 0.5 acres and without common ownership with adjacent parcels. If removed, there would only be a loss of seven lower income units. The total loss of potential lower income units is 20 units, while the City has a 559 lower income unit surplus buffer. Figure C13Figure C- 7 also shows Sites C and J by common ownership. Of the mixed-income sites, only Site #86 is smaller than 0.5 acres but it shares common ownership with two adjacent parcels in Site M (Owner ID 52).

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-58
Table C- 16: Small Sites (<0.5 acres) by Common Ownership Site
# APN Address Acres
Cons.

ID
Owner
ID Lower Mod
Above
Mod
Total
Units
Lower Income Units Only Sites
1 6670290215 2665 W Hillcrest Dr 7.43 61 148 148
12 6690262190 595 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.31 C 12 6 6
13 6690262200 611 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.18 C 15 3 3
14 6690262210 621 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.18 C 16 3 3
15 6690262220 661 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 1.08 C 11 21 21
16 6690262440 707 E Thousand Oaks Blvd B 0.44 C 18 8 8
17 6690262430 711 E Thousand Oaks Blvd A 0.54 C 18 10 10 18 6690262280 0 *Unassigned 0.22 C 8 4 4
19 6690262290 732 Greenwich Dr 0.09 C 8 1 1
20 6690262300 0 *Unassigned 0.02 C 8 1 1
21 6690262310 750 Greenwich Dr 0.11 C 8 2 2
22 6690262270 723 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.2 C 8 4 4
23 6690262320 757 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.19 C 8 3 3
24 6690262330 763 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.09 C 8 1 1
25 6690262340 758 Greenwich Dr 0.13 C 11 2 2
26 6690262370 772 Greenwich Dr 0.33 C 11 6 6
27 6690262380 790 Greenwich Dr 0.11 C 11 2 2
28 6690262360 783 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.22 C 11 4 4
29 6690262350 777 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.09 C 9 1 1
44 6700170175 1432 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 5.91 60 118 118 51 6700160260 1489 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 1.33 F 34 26 26 52 6700160130 1429 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.72 F 34 14 14 53 6700160270 1459 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 1.86 F 34 37 37 63 6710140080 2797 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 4.58 59 91 91
66 6710160050 3157 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 1.60 J 44 31 31 67 6710160060 3167 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.22 J 42 4 4
68 6710160080 3185 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.22 J 42 4 4
69 6710160090 3183 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.26 J 42 5 5
70 6710160200 3175 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.67 J 42 13 13 71 6710160070 3177 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.22 J 42 4 4
72 6710160110
3209 E Thousand Oaks Bl
Blvd 1 1.69 J 45 33 33
73 6710160120 3245 E Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.36 J 43 7 7
77 6770300035 1330 N Moorpark Rd 5.31 L 48 106 106
78 6770300045 1332 N Moorpark Rd 2.42 L 48 48 48
79 6770300055 1382 N Moorpark Rd 2.32 L 49 46 46
80 6770300075 1388 N Moorpark Rd 4.06 L 50 81 81
81 6770300165 1440 N Moorpark Rd 0.92 L 50 18 18
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-59
82 6770300195 620 E Janss Rd 1.61 LL 50 32 32
83 6770300125 612 E Janss Rd 1.0 LL 51 20 20
Mixed-Income Unit Sites
2 5250052555 148 W Hillcrest Dr A 1.32 A 2 13 13 26
3 5250052575 130 W Hillcrest Dr B 6.5 A 3 65 64 129
4 5250020365 139 W Thousand Oaks Blvd. 1.71 A 1 17 17 34 5 5250052465 147 W Thousand Oaks Blvd 0.82 A 1 8 8 16
6 5250052485 0 *Unassigned 2.02 A 1 20 20 40
84 5700090335
1934 E Avenida De Los
Arboles 5.02 M 54 50 50 100
85 5700090345
2000 E Avenida De Los
Arboles #A 8.42 M 52 84 84 168
86 5700090355 0 *Unassigned 0.28 M 52 3 2 5
87 5700090245
2048 E Avenida De Los
Arboles #B 0.85 M 52 8 8 16
88 5700090045
2072 E Avenida De Los
Arboles 0.91 M 53 18 18
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-60
Figure C- 137: Site C and Site J Parcels with Common Ownership City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-61
Table C- 17: Redevelopment Projects with Lot Consolidation Site Description Lot Consolidation
Lupe’s Restaurant Conversion of Lupe’s Restaurant
and one SFH to two, three-story
buildings with 36 apartments and
4,980 s.f. of commercial on a 2.62
acres.

Yes- consolidation of multiple
parcels of land totaling 5.13 acres.

The 2.62 acre lot was the result of
merging 17 underlying legal lots into
3 legal lots. The resulting site for the
mixed-use development was the
result of combining lots of the
following approximate sizes: 0.273,

0.247, 0.241, 1.05 and 0.75 acres
with 0.14 acres of abandoned right of
way.

Hillcrest Villa 60-unit affordable housing project Yes- five (5) parcels of land totaling

2.98 acres
Garden View Terrace Construction of 56 units - included relocation of the low-income tenants
and one-to-one replacement of the
demolished units
Yes- five lots held by three different
ownership totaling 2.2 acres.
77 North Conejo School Road Construction of 40 apartment units.

There are examples of projects that involved lot consolidation of parcels with and without common ownership (Table C- 17Table C- 17). For example, Lupe’s Restaurant was replaced with 36 residential units and 4,980 square feet of commercial. Lupe’s project involved lot consolidation but did not include affordable units. However, with the adoption of the General Plan, corresponding Zoning Code updates, Objective Development Standards, and the Inclusionary Housing Program, development of more affordable units will be incentivized and there will likely be an affordable housing inclusionary component for all qualifying residential projects. The Objective Development Standards were adopted in March 2022 and Effective in April 2022 include an increase in maximum height for projects containing at least 20 percent affordable units. There have also been several inquiries from the development community regarding consolidation of smaller parcels within the SP 20 boundary suggesting that this trend will continue and expand.

Two examples of projects on small sties with affordable units include Hillcrest Villa and Garden View Terrace. The locations were appropriate for a new affordable housing projects due to proximity to an existing elementary school, and shopping and services along Thousand Oaks Boulevard (like many of the sites selected in the sites inventory). Layers of Federal, State, and City funding are invested in both properties. Both Sites C and J, which have some parcels smaller than 0.5, assume the potential consolidation of parcels with and without common ownership and are both located along Thousand Oaks Boulevard.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-62
Hillcrest Villa Project
With the assistance from the City, Many Mansions purchased the site consisting of five (5) parcels of land totaling 2.98 acres, located on the south side of Hillcrest Drive, approximately 350 feet east of Quinta Vista Drive (2672, 2676, 2686 and 2736 Hillcrest Drive and 2645 Los Feliz Drive).

In order for Many Mansions to construct the 60-unit affordable housing project, the General Plan “Low-Density Residential” designation on the three (3) parcels was amended to “Medium Density Residential”. Based on the total acreage of the site (2.98 acres), and medium density of 15 units per acre on the entire site, a total of 45 units was allowed. However, Many Mansions, consistent with State law and City ordinance, filed a Density Bonus application requesting a maximum of thirty five (35 percent) percent density bonus for an additional fifteen (15) units, for a total of 60 dwelling units.

The project 60 total units consisted of 15 Extremely low units for homeless persons with a mental disability and their families, 15 units for extremely low-income and homeless families, 18 Very Low, 11 Lower, and 1 Manager’s unit. Layers of Federal, State, and City funding are invested in the property.

The affordable non-profit developed is condition to have property remain affordable for 55-years.

Garden View Terrace
With the assistance from the City, the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura (AHA) purchased five parcels held by three separate ownerships, identified as 1972, 1990, 1994, 2020 & 2026 Los Feliz Drive over a period of several years. The project included relocation of the low-income tenants and one-to-one replacement of the demolished units. Acquisition of these parcels provided an opportunity to assemble a site to construct affordable housing in the downtown area.

The project contained five lots totaling 2.2 acres of land, located on the south side of Los Feliz Drive, approximately 800 feet west of Conejo School Road. All five parcels totaled 96,000 SF (2.2 ac) are designated as “High Density Residential” by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. In order to construct the affordable housing project, AHA requested that the zoning on the entire site be changed from RPD -15U and RPD-20U to RPD-30U. This request is consistent with the existing designation of the General Plan Land Use Element of “High Density Residential”. The project consists of 56 unit distributed among ten buildings, a community building and a subterranean parking structure and additional parking spaces within the open parking lot and within a carport. The project’s 56 units consist of 9 extremely low, 46 Very Low, 1 Manager Unit.

For the Mixed-Use sites (not including the mall sites), in the event that these sites are not consolidated or/or produce affordable units, they only have a combined capacity of 81 lower units. If these units are moderate or low moderate, there are enough surplus units to buffer this loss. In the Mall sites, two parcels/sites are less than 0.5 acres but they are more likely to be developed as part of the entire block.

Also, these parcels only represent one lower income unit each. Their loss to moderate or above moderate income would not significantly affect the City’s availability to meet its lower income RHNA obligations.

In addition, Oxnard Projects at 705 N. Oxnard Boulevard, Cypress Road, and N. Hayes Street (Table C- 15Table C- 15) are examples of 100 percent affordable projects on sites that consolidated small lots around 0.5 acres or less.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-63

6. Affordability Assumptions
State law (Assembly Bill 2342/Government Code 65583.2) uses allowed density as a proxy for income/affordability for the sites inventory. Table C- 18: Table C- 18: shows the site conditions used to determine affordability for the sites inventory. Generally, lower density zones are presumed to be affordable to moderate and above moderate households. Under state law, the “default density” for a jurisdiction in a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) with a population greater than 100,000 are considered metropolitan, and so their default density is at least 30 units/acre. “Default density” refers to the density considered suitable to encourage and facilitate the development of affordable housing and “at least” means the density range allowed on the parcel has to include the default density. In estimating development potential, State law also requires the use of demonstrated trends or minimum density to estimate potential yield on each property. Given that the City has few recent multi-family or mixed use development projects to establish trends, this analysis uses the minimum densities to estimate potential yield. This approach would also minimize triggering the Not Net Loss provisions (SB 166) when sites are developed below the assumed density.

Mixed-Use and Mall Sites
The sites inventory assumes that sites with the Mixed-Use designation can be affordable to lower income, moderate, and above moderate income households, since the allowable density ranges from 20 units/acre to 30 units/acre. Sites with Mixed-Use designation (the Mixed-Use and Mall sites categories) were split into lower, moderate, and above moderate income based on:

1. Size of parcel, either alone or consolidated with adjacent sites;

2. Total unit capacity, alone or consolidated with adjacent sites); and

3. Location, resource category.

The City considered that according to HCD, parcels need to be appropriately sized (between 0.5 to 10 acres) to achieve financial feasibility of lower income units in selecting which site(s) to split. The City also considered that “to achieve financial feasibility, many assisted housing developments using state or federal resources are between 50 to 150 units.”26 Using 50 units as a threshold, Mixed-Use sites that had less than 50 potential units were considered feasible only for moderate and above moderate income. The City also made efforts to ensure lower income units were not concentrated in areas of low resources and that moderate and above moderate income units were located in lower resource to promote mixed-income neighborhoods. The City has committed to enhancing housing mobility strategies and encouraging development of new affordable housing in high resource areas by implementing Active Transportation Plan, ADA Transition Plan, and designating new residential areas, such as Village Centers as part of the Draft PreferredEndorsed Land Use Map. 26 Department of Housing and Community Development, Division of Housing and Policy Development, Housing Element Site Inventory Guidebook Government code Section 65583.2. June 10, 2020, pg.15.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 C-64
Neighborhood Sites
The Neighborhood Medium-High site was considered feasible for lower and moderate income. The Neighborhood Medium-High site has an allowable density ranging from 20 units/acre to 30 units/acre. The neighboring land uses are lower intensity single-family use, which tends to be more feasible for moderate units. The Neighborhood Low-Medium site is suitable only for above moderate sites due to their allowable density (6 to 10 units/acre), or single-family home use.

Table C- 18: Affordability Assumptions by Density
Allowable Density
Range
(du/ac)
Income Level
Mixed-Use 20-30 Lower, Moderate, and Above Moderate
Mall Sites 20-30 Lower and Moderate
Neighborhood Medium-High 20-30 Lower and Moderate
Neighborhood Low-Medium 6-10 Above Moderate
III. CONCLUSION
Overall, the City has the ability to accommodate at least 2,295 units on vacant and underutilized sites across the City under the Draft PreferredEndorsed Land Use Map for the General Plan 2045 update and its development regulations. The City has identified 97 candidate sites that are anticipated to get a new land use designation with allowable density ranges. Combined with the 1,891 credit units from potential ADUs and pipeline and pending projects, the City can meet its RHNA needs.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023
D-1
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair
Housing
I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OF AB 686
AB 686 passed in 2017 requires the Housing Element to include an analysis of barriers that restrict access to opportunity and a commitment to specific meaningful actions to affirmatively further fair housing. The Bill added an assessment of fair housing to the Housing Element which includes the following components: a summary of fair housing issues and assessment of the City’s fair housing enforcement and outreach capacity; an analysis of segregation patterns and disparities in access to opportunities, an assessment of contributing factors, and an identification of fair housing goals and actions.

The City collaborated with the HUD Entitlement Cities of Camarillo, Oxnard, San Buenaventura, and Simi Valley, and the Ventura Urban County including the Cities of Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai, Port Hueneme, Santa Paula, and the Unincorporated areas of Ventura County in the preparation of the Ventura County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice in 2020. As appropriate, data and discussions from the 2020 AI are incorporated here.

II. ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING ISSUES

1. Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach
As outlined in Ventura County’s 2020 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (2020 AI), the City has committed to complying with applicable federal and state fair housing laws including, but not limited to, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, and the Fair Housing Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).

For housing services, the City relies on the County’s contract with the Housing Rights Center (HRC) to provide fair housing services to City residents, other County entitlement jurisdictions, and Ventura County. HRC is a non-profit agency whose mission is to actively support and promote fair housing through education and advocacy. The services provided by HRC include the investigation and resolution of housing discrimination complaints, discrimination auditing and testing, and education and outreach, including the dissemination of fair housing information such as written material, workshops, and seminars. The materials are made available free to the public in several different languages including English, Spanish, Korean, Mandarin, Armenian, Cantonese and Russian.

Depending on the audience, the presentations can be translated by staff into Armenian, Mandarin, Spanish, or Russian. Landlord/tenant counseling is another fair housing service that involves informing landlords and tenants of their rights and responsibilities under fair housing law and other consumer protection legislations as well as mediating disputes between tenants and landlords.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-2
The 2020 AI presented information on housing discrimination basis for the entire County.

Discrimination complaints from both in-place and prospective tenants that are filed with HRC (or screened from regular calls) are first referred to the HRC Counseling Department. The complaining party is asked to describe the events and issues that prompted the complaint. Complaints are then passed to the HRC Investigations Department and reviewed to see if the facts provided warrant an investigation. Figure D-1Figure D-1 shows the complaint process flowchart for the Housing Rights Center.

Figure D-1: Housing Rights Center Complaint Process Flowchart City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-3
Fair Housing Enforcement
Regional Trends
The 2020 AI presented information on housing discrimination basis for the entire County. A total of 35 housing discrimination cases were opened by HRC between 2017 and the first half of 2019, with most of the allegations of housing discrimination filed by the residents of Simi Valley (31 percent), Camarillo (29 percent) and Thousand Oaks (14 percent). Complaints pertaining to physical disability (66 percent) and mental disability (20 percent) were the most common. Discrimination based on national origin (6 percent), familial status (6 percent), and religion (3 percent) were less frequently reported. Over half of the complaints (57 percent) were successfully conciliated by HRC, with roughly a quarter either withdrawn by the client (17 percent) or closed with no enforcement action taken (9 percent). Fourteen percent (5 complaints) were reported as pending as of October 2019. The sole complainant of discrimination based on national origin, filed by a Camarillo resident in 2017 was referred to HRC’s ligation department.

The services provided by HRC are augmented by the State of California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), which has the authority to investigate and prosecute violations of state civil rights laws on a state-wide basis, including the use of discriminatory language in housing advertisement. Of the 969 complaints of housing discrimination investigated in 2017 in the state, only 21 (two percent) were from Ventura County residents. Most housing discrimination complaints filed with the DFEH are based on the disability (43 percent), race (14 percent), or familial status (11 percent) of the complainant. Of those individuals who identified their race when filing a complaint, 31 percent identified as white, followed by 28 percent identifying as Hispanic or Latino, and Black or African American (23 percent).

Local Trends
According to the Fair Housing Program Reports from FY 2014 to 2021, the HRC received 63 discrimination inquiries from Thousand Oaks residents resulting in nine cases being opened. Of the 63 discrimination inquiries, the most common reason for discrimination was physical disability (60 percent) followed by mental disability (24 percent) and national origin (three percent). Most of the discrimination inquiries (78 percent) were counseled, meaning the caller was only seeking fair housing information and/or did not want to file a complaint. Of the nine cases opened, discrimination was based on physical disability for seven cases, while mental disability and national origin was the basis for discrimination for the other two cases. Six of the nine cases were found to have sustained allegations and but only two were resolved with conciliation.

HRC also provided tenant/landlord services to 484 clients, with the most common issues being notices (17 percent), substandard conditions (13 percent), rent increases (eight percent), lease terms (seven percent), repairs (six percent), and security deposits (six percent).

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-4
Fair Housing Testing
Initiated by the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division in 1991, fair housing testing involves the use of an individual or individuals who pose as prospective renters for the purpose of determining whether a landlord is complying with local, state, and federal fair housing laws.

Regional Trends
The 2020 AI reported that 10 fair housing tests were conducted by the Housing Rights Center (HRC) to investigate complaints of housing discrimination based on race in Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks.

Evidence of discrimination was found in three instances in Simi Valley, with White testers receiving preferential treatment as compared to Black or African American testers. A similar number of fair housing tests were conducted by HRC in 2017.

Local Trends
Testing is done through the case investigation process as shown in the flow chart in Figure D-1Figure D-1 and reported back to the county quarterly. There is also random testing throughout the County.

The 2020 AI reported that testing was done in Thousand Oaks in 2018. Test status closed with successful conciliation. The tenant was provided a reasonable accommodation for an extension of time to vacate. HRC submits Quarterly Summary Reports (QSR) between 2014 and 2020 .

Fair Housing Education and Outreach
Regional Trends
The HRC organizes an annual fair housing conference and resource fair for housing providers and advocates at the County Government Center and the Cities of Camarillo, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks on housing rights, which include the topics of sexual orientation, racial and ethnic relations, and religion. Housing rights workshops are offered to landlords, property managers, and community members. Information on federal and state fair housing laws, common forms of housing discrimination, protected characteristics, unlawful practices, and fair housing liability is presented to workshop participants. Bilingual media outlets (primarily English and Spanish) and social media platforms are used to promote the conference and scheduled workshops and to provide general information on fair housing.

Information on rental housing options gathered from various classified and rental property sources is published on a monthly basis and distributed to the public and to social services representatives throughout the County. Individual assistance is provided to Ventura County landlords and renters, many of whom are low- and moderate-income, seeking information on a variety of general housing topics.

Local Trends
In 2021, the annual housing workshop for the City of Thousand Oaks was held virtually on January 13 at 6:30 PM. In past years the resident’s workshop was held at the Thousand Oaks Main Library.

In addition, just in the month of June 2021, the HRC offered over 20 fair housing related outreach events. The outreach events included:
• Fair Housing Rights Workshops (in English and Spanish), City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-5
• COVID-19 Housing Rights Workshop,
• Facebook Live Housing Rights Q&A Live,
• Para Los Niños: Sexual Harassment Housing Rights Workshop, • National Center on Law & Elder Rights: "Emergency Rental Assistance Programs and Other Tools to Prevent Evictions of Older Adult Tenants," and • Housing Rights Workshop: Black Community Education Task Force.

These events were offered to Ventura County and Los Angeles County jurisdictions for which HRC offers Fair Housing services. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, most events were held as webinars.

HRC has a permanent Weekly Calendar of online events (Figure D-2Figure D-2). Residents can register for the workshops and clinic appointments at: https://www.housingrightscenter.org/fairhousing-education Figure D-2: Weekly Online Workshops Offered by the Housing Rights Center (2021) Public Outreach for Activities Related to Housing and Community Development (CDBG) In accordance with the City’s Citizen Participation Plan (Resolution 2020-013) which is updated every five years, the City provides at least three public hearing throughout the year, and 30 days of public review for comments for the annual CDBG Action Plan, the annual Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), and Substantial Amendments to the Consolidated Plan and/or Action Plan. The City provides notices of public review and public hearing via announcements on the City of Thousand Oaks website, through a legal notice published in the Ventura County Star and through a prominent display ad in the Thousand Oaks Acorn free newspaper as well as social media. The Thousand Oaks Acorn, a free newspaper, was named by respondents to the City’s most recent Attitude Survey, as their number one source for local news. On request, the City makes CDBG-related documents and reports available in alternative formats for review by persons with disabilities. Public noticing is also provided to low-income tenants living in apartments owned by the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura, Many Mansions, and the Shadow Apartments.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-6
Public Outreach Strategies to Reach Disadvantaged Communities Housing Rights Center
Outreach activities ranged from media ads and literature distribution to fair housing presentations.

The Housing Right Center (HRC) annually submits press releases, public service announcements, and online advertisements to media contacts. These media activities included information, in both English and Spanish, on HRC’s programs and services (including the agency’s contact information and office locations) along with fair housing workshop opportunities throughout the Ventura County region.

Variety of venues to hold community meetings
Community meetings are held at City Hall, City Libraries, and various Community Rooms of low income apartment complexes throughout the City such as, Many Mansions and the Housing Authority of the County of Ventura.

Noticing
The City publicizes via a prominent display ad in the local free newspaper, the Thousand Oaks Acorn, and via a legal notice in the local newspaper of record, the Ventura County Star, on Community Development Block Grant related public hearings or public review periods. In the most recent City survey, respondents named the Thousand Oaks Acorn as their number one source for City news.

Increased mobile phone app engagement
The City communicates through its website at www.toaks.org and on its social media (Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) accounts.

Other
While providing fair housing education for the public and housing professionals is critical, ensuring city staff understand fair housing laws and are sensitive to the discrimination issues is equally important. All City employees are required to take a “Discrimination Prevention” course. In addition, City Hall Buildings are accessible to persons with disabilities. The City's Public Information Office coordinates the citywide communications and civic engagement activities through:
• Social Media
• Media Relations
• City Website
• TOTV - Government Access Television
• City Newsletters
• Press Releases
• Community Relations

2. Integration and Segregation
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-7
Race/Ethnicity
Ethnic and racial composition of a region is useful in analyzing housing demand and any related fair housing concerns, as it tends to demonstrate a relationship with other characteristics such as household size, locational preferences and mobility. To measure segregation in a given jurisdiction, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides racial or ethnic dissimilarity trends. Dissimilarity indices are used to measure how evenly two groups are distributed throughout a jurisdiction. The following shows how HUD views various levels of the index:
• <40: Low Segregation
• 40-54: Moderate Segregation
• >55: High Segregation
Regional Trends
Regionally, non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanic/Latinos make up 93 percent of Ventura County’s population and have similar shares in population (46 percent whites and 43 percent Hispanics, Table D-1Table D-1). The cities of Oxnard and Santa Paula have the highest concentration of Hispanic population, with Hispanic residents making up 74 percent and 82 percent of their population.

As explained above, dissimilarity indices are measures of segregation, with higher indices meaning higher degree of segregation. In Ventura County, all minority (non-white) residents combined are considered moderately segregated from White residents (index is 50 in 2020, Table D-2Table D-2).

However, the dissimilarity index between Hispanic and White residents is considered a high degree of segregation. All dissimilarity indices have increased in the past 30 years in the County, except for Blacks/Whites, indicating increasing segregation among residents of non-White races from Whites.

Table D-1: Racial Composition in Neighboring Cities and County White
alone
Hispanic/
Latino
Black or
Afr. Am.

Am. Ind./
Alaska
Native
Asian Hawaiian/
Pac. Isldr
Other
City of Ventura 55.7% 36.0% 1.7% 0.4% 3.6% 0.1% 2.5%
Camarillo 57.3% 27.2% 1.6% 0.2% 10.1% 0.1% 3.4%
Oxnard 14.5% 73.6% 2.4% 0.2% 7.1% 0.3% 1.9%
Santa Paula 15.1% 81.9% 0.2% 0.1% 1.3% 0.0% 1.4%
Thousand Oaks 66.8% 19.4% 1.3% 0.2% 9.6% 0.1% 2.7%
Ventura County 45.4% 42.7% 1.7% 0.2% 7.2% 0.2% 2.6%
Sources: American Community Survey, 2015-2019.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-8
Table D-2: Dissimilarity Indices for Ventura County (1990-2020) 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current
Ventura County
Non-White/White 46.24 49.11 47.27 50.49
Black/White 47.82 45.42 36.6 41.99
Hispanic/White 52.19 56.14 54.55 56.75
Asian or Pacific Islander/White 29.93 28.93 28.61 34.03 Sources: HUD Dissimilarity Index, 2020.

Figure D-4Figure D-4 below shows the concentration of minority population in the County is concentrated in Oxnard, Santa Paula, and Fillmore. Red block groups indicate that over 81 percent of the population in the tract is non-white. Figure D-4Figure D-4 shows census tracts in Ventura County by the racial or ethnic groups that make up the majority of the population. The categories show the percentage population gap between the majority racial/ethnic group and the next largest racial/ethnic group. The more intense the color, the higher the percentage gap between the predominant racial/ethnic group and the next largest racial/ethnic group. As expected, based on the high percentage of Hispanic population (Table D-1Table D-1), the cities of Oxnard and Santa Paula have the highest concentration of Hispanic majority census tracts. Overall, Hispanic population predominates the north (east of the City of Ventura), while White majorities are more common in Camarillo, Thousand Oaks, and Simi Valley.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2023
D-9
Figure D-3: Minority Concentration by Block Group- Ventura County Figure D-4: Racial and Ethnic Majorities by Census Tract- Ventura County City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-10
Local Trends
Unlike the County, Thousand Oaks’ population is predominantly White (67 percent). As shown in Figure D-5Figure D-5, the White population has decreased by 4.6 percentage points between 2010 and 2019, while the Hispanic/Latino has grown by 2.9 percentage points. Asians and Blacks make up the third and fourth largest shares of population in the City.

From 1990 to 2020, non-White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents have become more segregated (Table D-3Table D-3). Segregation between non-White, Black, and Asian/Pacific Islander residents and Whites residents has also increased by more than six points though it is still considered “low segregation.” Hispanic and White residents have also become more segregated between 1990 and 2020, but their level of segregation is considered moderate. Figure D6Figure D-6 shows which race or ethnicity is predominant, and by how much. It uses map colors to identify the predominant racial or ethnic group in specific areas by tract. The strength of the color indicates the extent to which one group is dominant over the next most populous. The map shows that white population predominates most of the City’s tracts (grey tracts), while Hispanic population predominates a single tract southwest of the intersection of Highway 23 and E. Avenida de Los Arboles. However, Hispanic population is less than one percent higher than White in this tract (47.4 percent Hispanic, 46.7 percent White).

Figure D-5: Race/Ethnicity Composition Changes (2010-2019) Note: All other includes ACS categories “some other race alone” and “two or more races.” Source: American Community Survey (ACS), 2006-2010 and 2015-2019.

White Hispanic
Black or
African
American
American
Indian and
Alaska
Native
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
and Other
Pacific
Islander
All other
2010 71.4% 16.5% 0.9% 0.2% 9.0% 0.1% 2.1%
2019 66.8% 19.4% 1.3% 0.2% 9.6% 0.1% 2.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-11
Table D-3: Dissimilarity Indices City of Thousand Oaks (1990-2020) 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current
Thousand Oaks
Non-White/White 21.00 25.14 24.34 27.92
Black/White 14.47 15.26 15.27 24.23
Hispanic/White 31.78 37.9 36.25 39.12
Asian or Pacific Islander/White 12.50 14.6 21.3 26.63
Sources: HUD Dissimilarity Indices, 2020.

Figure D-6: Racial and Ethnic Majorities by Census Tract- City of Thousand Oaks Figure D-7 also shows the concentration of non-white minorities by block group across the City. Most minorities appear to be concentrated in block groups north of Ventura Highway 101 and at the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 23.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-12
Figure D-7: RHNA Unit Distribution by Minority Concentration - City of Thousand Oaks Distribution of RHNA Units by Percent Minority Concentration As part of the AFFH analysis, the City must show that sites identified in the inventory were selected in a manner that is consistent with its duty to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH). This involves an analysis of whether the identified sites serve the purpose of replacing segregated living patterns with integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity.

As shown in Figure D-7Figure D-7, the minority population is concentrated in census block groups located at the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 23, block groups west of Highway 23 and the westernmost block groups of the City north of Highway 101 (in orange). While most of the City’s RHNA sites are located along Highway 101, which have a higher concentration of minorities (between 41 to 80 percent), only 17 percent of all RHNA units are located in block groups with the highest concentration of minorities (61 to 80 percent) (Table D-4Table D-4). Approximately 36 percent of lower income units, 69 percent of moderate income units, and 49 percent of above moderate income units are in block groups with the lowest percent racial/ethnic minorities. Only 13 percent of lower income units are located in block groups with the highest concentration of minority population.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-13
Table D-4: RHNA Unit Distribution by % Minority Concentration Lower Income
RHNA
Moderate Income
RHNA
Above Moderate
Income RHNA
Total RHNA
Units
0-20% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
21 - 40% 36.4% 68.6% 49.4% 45.9%
41 - 60% 50.3% 11.7% 3.9% 36.9%
61 - 80% 13.3% 19.7% 46.8% 17.3%
> 81% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 1,527 614 154 2,295
Table D-4Table D-4 also shows the City acreage by minority concentration. Only 2.2 percent of the City’s land area has a concentration of minority population higher than 61 percent and 17 percent of RHNA units are being sited in these areas of high concentration. However, the RHNA sites are intended to improve these areas where minorities are concentrated by both providing affordable housing opportunities (in low and moderate income RHNA units) and improvements through private investments through market rate development (above moderate units).

Persons with Disabilities
Persons with disabilities have special housing needs because of their fixed income, the lack of accessible and affordable housing, and the higher health costs associated with their disability.

Regional Trends
In Ventura County, about 10.9 percent of the population has a disability. According to the 2015-2019 ACS, large jurisdictions in the County have a similar population with disability ranging from 7.9 percent in Oxnard to 12.3 percent in Camarillo and the City of Ventura, respectively. Figure D-8Figure D-8 shows the population with disabilities in most census tracts is between 10 and 20 percent. Only a few census tracts in the region, in Ventura and Camarillo have a population with disability between 20 and 30 percent.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-14
Figure D-8: Population with Disabilities- Region
Local Trends
Thousand Oaks has a lower percentage population of persons with disabilities (10.3 percent) than the County (10.9 percent) and its neighboring cities of Camarillo (12.3 percent) and Simi Valley (11.2 percent) but higher than Moorpark (9.4 percent). Within the City, census tracts are split between those with less than 10 percent of the population with a disability and tracts with 10 to 20 percent of the population with a disability (Figure D-9Figure D-9).

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-15
Figure D-9: RHNA Unit Distribution by Concentration of Persons with Disability Distribution of RHNA by Percent Population with Disabilities Most RHNA units (90 percent) are located in tracts where the population of persons with disabilities is between 10 and 20 percent (Table D-5). A similar share of lower income units (90 percent) and moderate units (100 percent) are also located in tracts with 10 to 20 percent of its population with disabilities. About half of the above moderate units are located in tracts with 10 to 20 percent of its population with disabilities.

Table D-5: RHNA Site Inventory Unit Distribution by % Population with Disabilities Lower Income
RHNA
Moderate Income
RHNA
Above Moderate
Income RHNA
Total RHNA Units
< 10% 9.7% 0.0% 49.4% 9.8%
10% - 20% 90.3% 100.0% 50.6% 90.2%
20% - 30% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total Units 1,527 614 154 2,295
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-16
Familial Status
Familial status refers to the presence of children under the age of 18, whether the child is biologically related to the head of household or the marital status of the head of household. Families with children may face housing discrimination by landlords who fear that children will cause property damage. Some landlords may have cultural biases against children of the opposite sex sharing a bedroom. Differential treatments such as limiting the number of children in an apartment complex or confining children to a specific location are also fair housing concerns. Single parent households are also protected by fair housing law.

Regional Trends
According to the 2015-2019 ACS, 35 percent of households in Ventura County have children under the age of 18. In the region, the cities of Oxnard and Santa Paula have the highest percentage of households with children (47 percent and 42 percent). Meanwhile, about a third of households in Moorpark, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks have children. Figure D-10Figure D-10 shows the distribution of children in married-couple households by census tract and Figure D-11 shows the distribution of single female-headed households by census tract. Census tracts in Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and Moorpark have a high concentration of children in married people households.

The inverse trend is shown in
Figure D-11
Figure D-11, which shows that census tracts with a high concentration of children in single femaleheaded households are concentrated in Oxnard, Ventura, Santa Paula, and some tracts in Simi Valley.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-17
Figure D-10: Children in Married Households- Region
Figure D-11: Children in Single Female-Headed Households- Region City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-18
Local Trends
Approximately 30 percent of households in Thousand Oaks have children, fewer than the surrounding jurisdictions of Simi Valley (33.4 percent), Moorpark (36.3 percent), Santa Paula (42 percent), and the County (34.8 percent) but higher than the City of Camarillo (28.7 percent). According to the HCD AFFH mapin Figure D-12Figure D-12, children in married-couple households are mostly concentrated in the northern and eastern most areas of the City. In these census tracts, over 80 percent of children are in married-couple households. Census tracts at the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 23, the westernmost tracts of the City, and some tracts within Newbury Park had lower concentrations of children in married-couple households.

Figure D-12: Children in Married-Couple Households- City of Thousand Oaks Figure D-13Figure D-13 shows children in single female-headed households are concentrated in the census tracts northwest of the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 23.

Figure D-13: Children in Single Female-Headed Households- City of Thousand Oaks Distribution of RHNA Units by Familial Status
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-19
Most RHNA units are located in tracts along Highway 101 in the city, which have a low percentage of children in married-couple households and a high percentage of children in family households (60 to 80 percent, relative to other tracts in the City). As shown in Table D-6Table D-6, 97 percent of RHNA units are located in census tracts where 60 to 80 percent of children are in married-couple households, including all the lower income units.

All but two tracts in the City have less than 20 percent of children living in single female-headed households (Table D-7) and RHNA units are distributed between tracts that have less than 20 percent of the children population in single female-headed households and 20 to 40 percent. Most of the RHNA units (77 percent) are located in tracts with a lower concentration of children in single femaleheaded households, which consists of lower (71 percent), moderate (88 percent), and above moderate (87 percent) income units.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-20
Table D-6: RHNA Site Inventory Unit Distribution by Percent of Children in Married-Couple Households Lower Income
RHNA
Moderate Income
RHNA
Above Moderate
Income RHNA
Total RHNA Units
< 20 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
20% - 40% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
40% - 60% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
60% - 80% 100.0% 100.0% 50.6% 96.7%
> 80% 0.0% 0.0% 49.4% 3.3%
Total Units 1,527 614 154 2,295
Table D-7: RHNA Unit Distribution by Percent of Children in Single Female-Headed Households Lower Income
RHNA
Moderate Income
RHNA
Above Moderate
Income RHNA
Total RHNA Units
< 20 % 71.4% 88.4% 87.0% 77.0%
20% - 40% 5.6% 11.6% 13.0% 7.7%
40% - 60% 23.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.3%
60% - 80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
> 80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total Units 1,527 614 154 2,295
Income Level
Identifying low or moderate income (LMI) geographies and individuals is important to overcome patterns of segregation. HUD defines a LMI area as a census tract or block group where over 51 percent of the population is LMI (based on HUD income definition of up to 80 percent of the AMI).

Regional Trends
According to HUD’s 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data (most recent data available), 40 percent of Ventura County households earn low and moderate income.

Figure D-14Figure D-14 shows concentrations of low and moderate incomes by tract regionally.

Tracts with high concentration of LMI households exceeding 50% are located within parts of Oxnard, Camarillo, Santa Paula, and the City of Ventura.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-21
Figure D-14: Low and Moderate Income Population – Ventura Region Local Trends
The City of Thousand Oaks’ LMI population (29.5 percent) is substantially lower than the County’s (40 percent). As seen in Figure D-14Figure D-14, the City of Thousand Oaks only has a few block groups with a high percentage of LMI population (50 to 75 percent) and none with more than 75 percent of its population earning low and moderate incomes. Most of the block groups with the high concentration of LMI population are along Highway 101 and Highway 23 (Figure D-15Figure D-15).

Block groups with the highest concentration of LMI households (where between 50 and 75 percent of households are LMI) are located in the at the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 23 and in the westernmost block group north of Highway 101.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-22
Figure D-15: Low and Moderate Income Population- City of Thousand Oaks Distribution of RHNA Units by % of Low and Moderate Income Population Most RHNA units (61 percent) are located in census tracts with less than 50 percent LMI population (Table D-8Table D-8). About 39 percent of all RHNA units are located in census tracts where more than 50 percent of the population earn low incomes. In an effort to encourage mixed-income neighborhoods, lower income units are located in census tracts with different percentages of LMI population. About two thirds of lower income units and moderate units are located in census tracts with less than 50 percent LMI population.

Table D-8: RHNA Unit Distribution by LMI Population
Lower Income
RHNA
Moderate Income
RHNA
Above Moderate
Income RHNA
Total RHNA Units
< 25% 23.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.3%
25% - 50% 36.4% 68.6% 49.4% 45.9%
50% - 75% 40.6% 31.4% 50.6% 38.8%
75% - 100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total Units 1,527 614 154 2,295
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-23

3. Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas
Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP) In an effort to identify racially/ethnically-concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), HUD has identified census tracts with a majority non-White population (greater than 50 percent) and a poverty rate that exceeds 40 percent or is three times the average tract poverty rate for the metro/micro area, whichever threshold is lower.

Regional Trends
There are three R/ECAPs located within the County in Port Hueneme, Oxnard, and Santa Paula (Figure D-16Figure D-16).

Local Trends
There are no R/ECAPs identified in the City of Thousand Oaks. Because of this, zero percent of RHNA units are located in R/ECAP sites.

Figure D-16: Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs)- Region City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-24
Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAAs)
While racially concentrated areas of poverty and segregation (RECAPs) have long been the focus of fair housing policies, racially concentrated areas of affluence (RCAAs) must also be analyzed to ensure housing is integrated, a key to fair housing choice. According to a policy paper published by HUD, RCAAs are defined as affluent, White communities. According to HUD's policy paper, Whites are the most racially segregated group in the United States and in the same way neighborhood disadvantage is associated with concentrated poverty and high concentrations of people of color, conversely, distinct advantages are associated with residence in affluent, White communities.

While HCD has created its own metric for RCAAs, at the time of this writing the map on the AFFH tool is not available. Thus, the definition of RCAAs used in this analysis is the definition used by the scholars at the University of Minnesota Humphrey School of Public Affairs cited in HCD’s memo:
“RCAAs are defined as census tracts where 1) 80 percent or more of the population is white, and 2) the median household income is $125,000 or greater (slightly more than double the national median household income in 2016).

Regional Trends
Figure D-3Figure D-3 and Figure D-4Figure D-4 show the concentration of minority/ non-white population and majority populations across the region. In Figure D-3Figure D-3, census tracts in yellow have less than 20 percent non-white population, meaning over 80 percent of the population is White. There are a few tracts with over 80 percent White population located throughout the County, especially in Ventura, Camarillo, and Thousand Oaks. These census tracts are also census tracts with a median income over $125,000 in Thousand Oaks (Figure D-17Figure D-17). Although not all census tracts have the exact relationship of over 85 percent White and median income over $125,000 to qualify as “RCAAs,” throughout the County tracts with higher White population tend to have greater median incomes.

According to the 2020 Ventura County AI, Ventura County residents making less than $15/hour in Ventura County struggle to afford basic needs. In 2015, 87 percent of the county’s White population earned at least $15/hour, the highest percent among racial and ethnic groups, while 54 percent of the Latino population earned at least this amount, the lowest percentage of all groups. County residents who are White (and not Hispanic or Latino) and Asian residents make more than the County median per capita income ($33,435). White and not Hispanic or Latino residents make the most above the County median at $13,079 more per person. All other racial and ethnic groups make less, with Hispanic or Latino residents making an average of $15,553 less per person annually.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-25
Figure D-17: Median Income – Region
Local Trends
As discussed previously in the Race/EthnicityRace/Ethnicity section, most tracts in the City of Thousand Oaks are predominantly White (gap between whites and other races is over 50 percent) (Figure D-6Figure D-6). Figure D-7Figure D-7 shows the concentration of non-white minorities, but where non-white minorities are less than 20 percent (yellow block groups), the White population is over 80 percent. While only two of these yellow block groups have over 85 percent, they have the highest percentage of White population in the City (ranging from 80 to 85 percent). All but one of the block groups with more than 80 percent White population also have a median income greater than $125,000 (Figure D-18Figure D-18). While only two block groups meet the definition of RCAAs, there is a trend toward higher median incomes in areas with higher White population in the City.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-26
Figure D-18: Median Income - City of Thousand Oaks

4. Access to Opportunities
Significant disparities in access to opportunity are defined by the AFFH Final Rule as “substantial and measurable differences in access to educational, transportation, economic, and other opportunities in a community based on protected class related to housing.” TCAC Opportunity Maps
The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) convened the California Fair Housing Task force to “provide research, evidence-based policy recommendations, and other strategic recommendations to HCD and other related state agencies/ departments to further the fair housing goals (as defined by HCD).” The Task Force has created Opportunity Maps to identify resource levels across the state “to accompany new policies aimed at increasing access to high opportunity areas for families with children in housing financed with nine percent Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs)”. These opportunity maps are made from composite scores of three different domains made up of a set of indicators. Table D9Table D-9 shows the full list of indicators. The opportunity maps include a measure or “filter” to identify areas with poverty and racial segregation. To identify these areas, census tracts were first filtered by poverty and then by a measure of racial segregation. The criteria for these filters were:

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-27
• Poverty: Tracts with at least 30 percent of population under federal poverty line; • Racial Segregation: Tracts with location quotient higher than 1.25 for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, or all people of color in comparison to the County Table D-9: Domains and List of Indicators for Opportunity Maps Domain Indicator
Economic Poverty
Adult education
Employment
Job proximity
Median home value
Environmental CalEnviroScreen 3.0 pollution Indicators and values Education Math proficiency
Reading proficiency
High School graduation rates
Student poverty rates
Source: California Fair Housing Task Force, Methodology for the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, December 2020 Regional Trends
According to the 2021 TCAC/HCD opportunity area map, two census tracts in the region are considered “high segregation and poverty” areas (yellow) (Figure D-19Figure D-19). These census tracts are located in Ventura and Oxnard. TCAC maps categorize the level of resources in each census tract. Categorization is based on percentile rankings for census tracts within the region. Regionally, low resource areas (green) are concentrated in the western part of the County, starting in the middle of Ventura and south to Oxnard and east into the Santa Clara Valley. The southeastern census tracts (in Camarillo and Thousand Oaks) are considered high resource areas.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-28
Figure D-19: TCAC Composite Scores- Region
Local Trends
According to the HCD/TCAC opportunity map (Figure D-20Figure D-20), Thousand Oaks is made up of census tracts with varying degrees of resources, but most of the City is classified as high and highest resource. Census tracts at southwest, northwest, and northeast the edges of the City are high and highest resource. Meanwhile, tracts adjacent to the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 23 scored lower (low resource and moderate). The only low resource tracts in the City are concentrated east of this intersection.

Distribution of RHNA Units by TCAC Opportunity Area
Figure D-20Figure D-20 and Table D-10Table D-10 also show the distribution of RHNA sites across the TCAC opportunity areas. About 61 percent of all RHNA units are located in high and highest resource areas. Of the 1,527 lower income RHNA units, 59 percent are in the high/highest resource tracts and 75 percent in either high, highest, or moderate resource tracts. About 25 percent of lower income units are located in lower resource areas. These lower income units are in sites that assume moderate income units will also be built alongside them. In this manner, it is expected that mixedincome projects and neighborhoods will be built in the lower resource areas east of the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 23.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-29
Figure D-20: TCAC Opportunity Areas- City of Thousand Oaks Table D-10: RHNA Unit Distribution by TCAC Opportunity Area Lower Income
RHNA
Moderate
Income RHNA
Above Moderate
Income RHNA
Total RHNA
Units
High/Highest Resource 59.4% 68.6% 49.4% 61.2%
Moderate Resource 15.3% 11.6% 13.0% 14.1%
Low Resource 25.3% 19.9% 37.7% 24.7%
High Segregation & Poverty 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total Units 1,527 614 154 2,295
City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – June 2023January 2022 D-30
Opportunity Indices
While the Federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Rule has been repealed, the data and mapping developed by HUD for the purpose of preparing the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) can still be useful in informing communities about segregation in their jurisdiction and region, as well as disparities in access to opportunity. This section presents the HUD-developed index scores based on nationally available data sources to assess Thousand Oaks residents’ access to key opportunity assets in comparison to the County. Table D-11Table D-11 provides index scores or values (the values range from 0 to 100) for the following opportunity indicator indices:
• Low Poverty Index: The low poverty index captures poverty in a given neighborhood. The poverty rate is determined at the census tract level. The higher the score, the less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood.
• School Proficiency Index: The school proficiency index uses school-level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams to describe which neighborhoods have high-performing elementary schools nearby and which are near lower performing elementary schools. The higher the score, the higher the school system quality is in a neighborhood. • Labor Market Engagement Index: The labor market engagement index provides a summary description of the relative intensity of labor market engagement and human capital in a neighborhood. This is based upon the level of employment, labor force participation, and educational attainment in a census tract. The higher the score, the higher the labor force participation and human capital in a neighborhood.
• Transit Trips Index: This index is based on estimates of transit trips taken by a family that meets the following description: a 3-person single-parent family with income at 50 percent of the median income for renters for the region (i.e. the Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA). The higher the transit trips index, the more likely residents in that neighborhood utilize public transit. • Low Transportation Cost Index: This index is based on estimates of transportation costs for a family that meets the following description: a 3-person single-parent family with income at 50 percent of the median income for renters for the region/CBSA. The higher the index, the lower the cost of transportation in that neighborhood.
• Jobs Proximity Index: The jobs proximity index quantifies the accessibility of a given residential neighborhood as a function of its distance to all job locations within a region/CBSA, with larger employment centers weighted more heavily. The higher the index value, the better the access to employment opportunities for residents in a neighborhood. • Environmental Health Index: The environmental health index summarizes potential exposure to harmful toxins at a neighborhood level. The higher the index value, the less exposure to toxins harmful to human health. Therefore, the higher the value, the better the environmental quality of a neighborhood, where a neighborhood is a census block-group.

City of Thousand Oaks
2021-2029 Housing Element – January 2022 D-31
Table D-11: Opportunity Indices by Race/Ethnicity- Ventura County and City of Thousand Oaks Low Poverty
Index
School
Proficiency
Index
Labor Market
Index
Transit
Index
Low Transp.

Cost Index
Jobs
Proximity
Index
Env. Health
Index
Ventura County
Total Population
White, Non-Hispanic 72.62 61.67 51.75 64.1 70.38 78.93 44.78 Black, Non-Hispanic 60.76 39.71 49.13 52.75 75.08 82.03 39.34 Hispanic 47.82 30.11 46.29 43.25 73.84 82.15 38.13
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 69.26 52.5 50.94 61.22 73.62 80.08 40.16 Native American, Non-Hispanic 59.7 48.02 47.55 52.92 70.89 80.82 44.05 Population below federal poverty line
White, Non-Hispanic 64.14 58.07 53.76 53.93 70.25 81.19 46.6 Black, Non-Hispanic 50.45 45.88 23.14 46.3 79.07 84.78 38.52 Hispanic 38.6 37.91 23.8 45.04 75.16 83.64 37.83
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 60.63 50.36 40.17 44.36 75.36 80.57 40.53 Native American, Non-Hispanic 31.63 35.08 13.42 33.15 81.40 86.51 37.49 City of Thousand Oaks
Total Population
White, Non-Hispanic 81.97 77.71 74.24 71.38 77.58 70.64 43.55 Black, Non-Hispanic 76.66 76.63 72.06 71.11 79.36 73.22 43.20 Hispanic 68.09 71.61 66.64 71.54 81.48 77.55 42.26
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 80.08 80.66 76.26 70.34 77.81 69.95 43.84 Native American, Non-Hispanic 74.81 75.38 71.24 71.16 78.80 74.69 43.00 Population below federal poverty line
White, Non-Hispanic 72.78 69.34 69.75 72.79 81.35 79.62 42.85 Black, Non-Hispanic 97.25 57.24 92.54 64.54 79.38 95.43 45.25 Hispanic 59.15 70.58 63.86 72.61 85.26 88.63 42.23
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 81.99 75.38 72.82 72.62 76 65.92 46.85 Native American, Non-Hispanic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note: American Community Survey Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. See page 28 for index score meanings. Table is comparing the total Ventura County and Thousand Oaks population, by race/ethnicity, to the County and City population living below the federal poverty line, also by race/ethnicity.

Thousand Oaks City CouncilDecember 5, 2023

Thousand Oaks City Council
December 5, 2023