Agenda Related Items - Meeting of December 12, 2023
Supplemental Packet Date: December 12, 2023
THOUSAND OAKS CITY COUNCIL
Supplemental
Information
Packet
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):
In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Department at (805) 449 -2151. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. Ask City Clerk staff if you desire to use this device. Upon request, the agenda and documents in this agenda packet, can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
2:30 p.m.
Supplemental Information:
Any agenda related public documents received and distributed to a majority of the City Council after the Agenda Packet is printed are included in Supplemental Packets. Supplemental Packets are produced as needed, typically a minimum of two —one available on the Thursday preceding the City Council meeting and the second on Tuesday at the meeting. The Supplemental Packet is available for public inspection on the City’s website at toaks.org/agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Dept at (805) 449 -2151 during normal busi- ness hours [main location pursuant to the Brown Act, G.C. 54957.5(2)].
Name City Item # In favor/opposed Comment
Noel Salvatore Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to this item
OPPOSED to item 10A!!!!!
Christine Heins Thousand Oaks 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to this item
It will turn into slum housing over time. It will down grade the community by over growth which the community can not handle.
The freeway intersections will be grossly impacted in which eventually you will try to expand the freeway entrance/ exits and over pass. Which will be horrific congestion and a huge mess no one has time to deal with. That will stretch on & on until completion 2 to 3 years past deadline.
My suggestion is getting the stop lights timed properly. Getting goats out on hills to eat over growth. Litter clean up. Tree trimming or removal of trees that are about to fall due to lack of water. Clean up over growth olarpund freeway on ramps. Some look horrible.
I've been here 50 years. Wendy dr & Borchard are already over congested and feel like freeways through 35mph zones which people speed through. It's only a matter of time before a student gets hit.
We also dont have enough space for extra students. How many kids you want to pack into these clsssrooms?Enough growth. Look at LA now! How long before it looks like that? We have homeless everywhere. Crime has SKYROCKETED.
Its loosing its charm fast. Is that build really best for this community? We need stuff to do. Places to eat. Not more people.
Patrick Cates Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to this item
Opposed to 10A
N/A Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to
this item
I am not in favor
Leslie B Cardillo Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to this item
Please..No more
N/A N/A 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to
this item
10a
Nicole Mikals Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to this item
For MANY reasons I oppose building on that land.
Willing to provide details upon request.
errin mikals Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to this item
I OPPOSE 10A. Do not build in the parcel behind our houses.
N/A N/A 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to
this item
Too much traffic
TO COUNCIL: 12/12/2023
MEETING DATE: 12/12/2013
1 Name City Item # In favor/opposed Comment
Please do not
designate as
mixed use
property.
Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to
this item
Please, NO on mixed use designation for this property.
N/A Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to
this item
It only takes a few minutes to see that most of the retail space in NP is empty and IHop just closed. What possible retail shops are going to survive if what we already have can't make it? This is such a greed issue and has nothing to do with helping the community.
Julie Dimas Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to this item
I request that you remove the mixed use designation from the Borchard property and retain its residential designation until a site specific plan can be reviewed. By the way I have lived in this area for 25 years and watched the water rise and stay like a huge swamp on that property for a few years. I recommend you build nothing on it for safety reasons .
Conor Logan Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to this item
Fire evacuation routes in NP are already in the top 1% most dangerous in the state. Don’t put 1,100 new apts. between us and our evacuation onto Wendy or Borchard Rds.
D. Christopher Fall Thousand Oaks 6 - Public Comments Neutral/Does Not Apply
Please check your FPPC Form 700s to make sure the Form is completely accurate. Thank you.
2