THOUSAND OAKS CITY COUNCIL
THOUSAND
CALIFORNIA
Supplemental
Information
Packet
Agendplement at PaceMete: Der Decer 12, 20,3023
2:30 p.m.
Supplemental Information:
Any agenda related public documents received and distributed to a majority of the City Council after the Agenda Packet is printed are included in Supplemental Packets. Supplemental Packets are produced a:
needed, typically a minimum of two-one available on the Thursday preceding the City Council meeting and the second on Tuesday at the meeting. The Supplemental Packet is available for public inspection on the City's website at toaks.org/agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Dept at (805) 449-2151 during normal busi- ness hours [main location pursuant to the Brown Act, G.C. 54957.5(2)].
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):
In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Department at (805) 449-2151. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. Ask City Clerk staff if you desire to use this device. Upon request, the agenda and documents in this agenda packet, can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO COUNCIL: 12/12/2023
MEETING DATE: 12/12/2013
Name City Item # In favor/opposed Comment
Noel Salvatore Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to OPPOSED to item 10A!!!!! this item
Christine Heins Thousand Oaks 6 - Public Comments 1 am opposed to It will turn into slum housing over time. It will down grade the this item community by over growth which the community can not handle.
The freeway intersections will be grossly impacted in which eventually you will try to expand the freeway entrance/ exits and over pass. Which will be horrific congestion and a huge mess no one has time to deal with. That will stretch on & on until completion 2 to 3 years past deadline.
My suggestion is getting the stop lights timed properly. Getting goats out on hills to eat over growth. Litter clean up. Tree trimming or removal of trees that are about to fall due to lack of water. Clean up over growth olarpund freeway on ramps. Some look horrible. l've been here 50 years. Wendy dr & Borchard are already over congested and feel like freeways through 35mph zones which people speed through. It's only a matter of time before a student gets hit.
We also dont have enough space for extra students. How many kids you want to pack into these clsssrooms?Enough growth. Look at LA now! How long before it looks like that? We have homeless everywhere. Crime has SKYROCKETED.
Its loosing its charm fast. Is that build really best for this community? We need stuff to do. Places to eat. Not more people.
Patrick Cates Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments 1am opposed to Opposed to 10A this item
N/A Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments 1 am opposed to I am not in favor this item
Leslie B Cardillo Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments lam opposed to Please...No more this item
N/A N/A 6 - Public Comments 1am opposed to 10a
this item
Nicole Mikals Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments l am opposed to For MANY reasons I oppose building on that land. this item Willing to provide details upon request.
errin mikals Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to I OPPOSE 10A. Do not build in the parcel behind our houses. this item
N/A N/A 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to Too much traffic this item
1 Name City Item # In favor/opposed Comment
Please do not Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments 1am opposed to Please, NO on mixed use designation for this property. designate as this item
mixed use
property.
N/A Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to It only takes a few minutes to see that most of the retail space in NP this item is empty and Hop just closed. What possible retail shops are going to survive if what we already have can't make it? This is such a greed issue and has nothing to do with helping the community.
Julie Dimas Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments 1 am opposed to I request that you remove the mixed use designation from the this item Borchard property and retain its residential designation until a site specific plan can be reviewed. By the way I have lived in this area for 25 years and watched the water rise and stay like a huge swamp on that property for a few years. I recommend you build nothing on it for safety reasons.
Conor Logan Newbury Park 6 - Public Comments I am opposed to Fire evacuation routes in NP are already in the top 1% most this item dangerous in the state. Don't put 1,100 new apts. between us and our evacuation onto Wendy or Borchard Rds.
D. Christopher Fall Thousand Oaks 6 - Public Comments Neutral/Does Please check your FPPC Form 700s to make sure the Form is Not Apply completely accurate. Thank you.
2