Agenda Related Items - Meeting of March 26, 2024
Supplemental Packet Date: March 26, 2024
THOUSAND OAKS CITY COUNCIL
Supplemental
Information
Packet
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):
In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Department at (805) 449-2151. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. Ask City Clerk st aff if you desire to use this device. Upon request, the agenda and documents in this agenda packet, can be made ava ilable in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification at least 48 hour s prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist City staff in assuring reasonable arrangement s can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
5:00 p.m.
Supplemental Information:
Any agenda related public documents received and distribut ed to a majority of the City Council after the Agenda Packet is printed are included in Supplemental Packets. Supplemental Packets are produced as needed, typically a minimum of two—one available on the Thursday preceding the City Council meeting and the second on Tuesday at the meeting. The Supplement al Packet is available for public inspection on the City’s website at toaks.org/agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Dept at (805) 449-2151 during normal busi- ness hours [main location pursuant to the Brown Act, G.C. 54957.5(2)].
THE FOLLOWING 11
PAGES ARE RELATED TO
ITEM 10.A.
From: Karen Martin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 3:21 PM
To: City Clerk's Office <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Reference sound study HCA 2005
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I want you to send over the pages as well so there is no confusion.
If I need to add text to my email, I cannot believe my intent is not clear, I would be happy to do so:
Justify that your HCA Cancer Center EIR/noise study that says the traffic noise has DECREASED 6 dB on Lynn Road in the preceding 20 years (see HCA Los Robles Hospital retrofit/expansion 2005 EIR attachment).
Karen Martin, Thousand Oaks
On Mar 26, 2024, at 2:27 PM, City Clerk's Office <[email protected]> wrote:
Ms. Martin,
Is there anything else you’d like to add to your comment to Council besides the below pages you sent over? If not, we’ll make sure to add this to the supplemental packet, as is.
Please let us know as soon as you can so we can include this in today’s afternoon Supplemental Packet.
Thank you,
Sandra Delgado, MPPA, CMC, CPMC
Deputy City Clerk
City of Thousand Oaks
(805) 449-2152
<image008.jpg>
From: Karen Martin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 2:07 PM
To: City Clerk's Office <[email protected]>
Subject: Reference sound study HCA 2005
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Sent from my iPhone
<image001.png>
<image002.png>
<image003.png>
<image004.png>
<image005.png>
<image006.png>
<image007.png>
1 &ƌŽŵ͗<ĂƌĞŶDĂƌƚŝŶфƚĂŬĞŽĚŽŐŐΛĂŽů͘ĐŽŵх
^ĞŶƚ͗dƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕DĂƌĐŚϮϲ͕ϮϬϮϰϮ͗ϬϳWD
dŽ͗ŝƚLJůĞƌŬΖƐKĨĨŝĐĞфĐŝƚLJĐůĞƌŬΛƚŽĂŬƐ͘ŽƌŐх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐŽƵŶĚƐƚƵĚLJ,ϮϬϬϱ
^ĞŶƚĨƌŽŵŵLJŝWŚŽŶĞ
28 2
29 3
30 4
31 5
32 6
33 7
34 8
Name (Optional) Community of Residenc ePlease choose the AgendPlease mark one of the optioComment R Scott Horn Newbury Park 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item This land swap is wrong. This is bad for the homeowners who live near there, they did not buy into this. This is good for big corporation that thinks about profit 1st. T.O. City staff has crafted another thing that avoids MEASURE E scrutiny. If they do this at one location now, they can do it again in my, or in your neighborhood.
City councilmen, please vote against Item 10A, this land swap sets a very bad precedent.
Bryan McQueeney Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre
hI am opposed to this item Rezoning from residential to commercial set a bad precedent for the community.
There are other sites available, zoned commercial, where this project can be located.
There are ample cancer services in the community. HCA has not identified a need. There is currently 31,000 square feet of commercial space available across the street from TOSH.
HCA bought this property knowing its residential zoning and knowing that the City rejected another, smaller, commercial project at this same site.
Richard Serino Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre
hI am opposed to this item It is crucial that you reject this proposal to rezone residential land. This will take away from much needed housing units at a time when there is a housing shortage (Definitely a bad look to the community). In 2015 a similar project (half the size) that wouldn't take away from housing units, the retirement home proposal, was already rejected in part because of the environmental impact report. This proposed cancer center is twice the size and will no doubt have an increase on negative environmental impact, much more then a retirement home. They will have to remove many trees/ Oak Trees from a rural area where they are a large part of the natural beauty of the area.
These cancer center specialists and offices already exist in our area. Los Robles is only looking to increase property value of the surgery center and make a new shiny object to point at when people criticize them for their horrible patient care record and massive settlements as a result of patient neglect. Increasing the size of their operation will only make patient care worse and increase the chance of mistakes.
The parking and traffic in the surrounding areas around the proposed site is already hectic. People double park on the street on a normal basis. Late patients constantly speed through the parking lots and surrounding streets, Narrowly dodging elderly patients and children at play. This proposed project will worsen these hazards significantly.
The project states its only a 9-5 operation but the existing parking lot has extremely bright street lights that stay on all night, they are a huge eye sore in nature and the neighborhoods around the property. The added parking lot infringes further into the mountain adding to the consistent light pollution.
Please, consider the outrageous impact this monstrosity of building would have on our beautiful close-nit community.
VOTE AGAINST THIS CANCER CENTER PROPOSAL.
Volker Schramm Newbury Park 10A - Proposed Compre
hI am opposed to this item The proposed location for the cancer center is currently zoned for single-family homes. Residents in the area rightfully expect their neighborhood to remain residential. Changing the zoning to commercial would disrupt the harmony of the community and potentially set a precedent for further rezoning.
TO COUNCIL: 03/26/2024
MEETING DATE: 03/26/2024
9 Name (Optional) Community of Residenc ePlease choose the AgendPlease mark one of the optioComment Peggy Sirota Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item Hello, I have lived in this neighborhood for over 30 years, and I am extremely concerned and upset knowing that the development of the Cancer Center will adversely impact the safety and atmosphere of our beautiful neighborhood. Every day and evening, there are people on horses and young children with parents walking their dogs around the neighborhood. Our streets are windy, therefore visibility is restricted- in addition, there are no sidewalks. The streets are rural in nature and all the neighbors drive carefully, fully aware that around the corner there might be someone on a horse or a person walking their dog. We all know there are always people out, enjoying the huge oak trees and the quiet streets.
The general public would not be aware of that. Even though there might be signage, they would be concerned about getting to their appointments on time or finding the park in an area that they are not familiar with.
I understand the need for a cancer facility and we all support that, but I feel very strongly that the center belongs in an urban area, rather than adjacent to a rural serene neighborhood with children. Safety is a very real concern.
The prospect of this change to our beloved neighborhood has sadly made me have to consider moving. I am keenly aware that if I had to sell my house (that I have put my life savings into) that my property value, and those of my neighbors, would drop considerably because the visually looming Cancer Center building would absolutely change the appearance of our serene rural roads and the beautiful views our properties have. In addition, any prospective buyers would be forced to consider the impact of a lot more public traffic in a neighborhood that lacks sidewalks and is abundant with horse travel, people walking dogs on the road, and families walking with their baby strollers. This influx of traffic would compromise our neighborhood’s safety. The impact of this development would make our neighborhood less desirable to those of us living here, and considerably less desirable to any prospective buyers.
I urge the city to please prevent the developers from adversely impacting our beloved neighborhood. The Cancer Center is much needed of course, but please pursue a more urban/business area for it that is more appropriate for a large complex with a lot of traffic coming and going.
Thank you,
Peggy Sirota
Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item The environmental impact is a concern, along with traffic and parking, zone swap, and night and day viewshed.
Shelley White Outside of Thousand Oa k10A - Proposed ComprehI am opposed to this item I vote against this proposal. HCA has a site perfectly suited to build their cancer center without destroying a residential neighborhood in the process. Go back to the General Plan and honor the Land Use Planning as well as verbal statements made by City Council members.
10A - Proposed ComprehI am opposed to this item Does not belong here. Development not in an appropriate location.
Austin Sincock Newbury Park 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item This is an encroachment on a residential neighborhood. HCA has a suitable place to build a Cancer Center.
Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item I oppose the cancer center being built on east rolling oaks drive Kelli Schollard - Sincock Newbury Park 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item A residential neighborhood is not the place to build a commercial office building that could be used for any commercial purpose. The commercial line of demarcation is Rolling Oaks Drive.
Gregory Sincock Newbury Park 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item Preserve and protect our community neighborhoods from commercial encroachment. Voting no means that this will not set a precedent for the city.
Sara Osborne Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item I oppose the proposed cancer center as it will affect the current zoning of my residential neighborhood. 10 Name (Optional) Community of Residenc ePlease choose the AgendPlease mark one of the optioComment Shanon Overbeck Newbury Park 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item Protect and preserve our neighborhoods. HCA can build their Cancer Center on land they own that is already zoned for it.
Sean Overbeck Newbury Park 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item Don't set a precedent that commercial encroachment can happen to our neighborhoods.
Simone Overbeck Newbury Park 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item HCA can build a Cancer Center near the hospital, where it belongs. Protect our neighborhoods.
Delia Abbott Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item Preserve our neighborhoods. A commercial building does not belong in this neighborhood.
Diana Abbott Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item Preserve our neighborhood. HCA has a place for this commercial office on their medical campus. Once built, there can be businesses in there that are not even related to a Cancer Center.
Cozett Abbott Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item Honor the General Plan and the words of City Council when it says neighborhoods are to be preserved and untouched. Don't be swayed and follow what you say.
Tami Jo Colburn Westlake Village 10A - Proposed Compre hI am in favor of this item A local cancer center would benefit our residents by eliminating the hardship of travel to far away locations for patients and their families.
The replacement of nine potential zoned single family homes is not ideal as we are in great need of more homes. However, ready access to needed cancer care will provide comfort to patients undergoing sometimes grueling treatments and provide local jobs for building and staffing the facility.
Lois Osborne Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre
hI am opposed to this item This neighborhood should remain residential. They should put the center at the Los Robles Hospital sight that they same they were going to put residential housing.
A park should have gone into the old Young Set location. We are about the only area that doesn't have a neighborhood park.
Ryan Gulbrandsen Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre
hI am opposed to this item Zoning for housing only at Rolling Oaks. Thank you.
Alan Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre hI am opposed to this item Really, a 58k square foot building in a residential zoned lot and neighborhood. 233 parking spaces.... wonder what they are planning longer term 800hrs of construction, noise, traffic, congression, dust etc. - would you want this is your neighborhood? Best is to put townhomes that folks can buy to begin their homeownership.
Sharon Sincock Thousand Oaks 10A - Proposed Compre
hI am opposed to this item Preserve our neighborhoods.
11