ATTACHMENT #7
cdd:420-46/sk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2025/2025-10-21/Shapell/Staff Report-City Council/pz/(FILE ID:
2019-70439-DP)
5 2
5 8
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
THOUSAND OAKS DENYING TWO APPEALS, AND UPHOLDING
THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFYING
THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM,
APPROVING THE CONEJO SUMMIT PROJECT, CONSISTING OF
TWO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS, A DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT, PROTECTED TREE PERMIT, AND UNIFORM SIGN
PROGRAM FOR THE USE OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF CONEJO
CENTER DRIVE AND RANCHO CONEJO BOULEVARD
[APPLICATIONS: 2022-70771-EIR, 2019-70440-VTTM, 2019-
70441-VTTM, 2019-70439-DP, 201-71158-PTP, 2019-70442-USP, 2019-70443-LPC; ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS: 667-0-340-
030; 667-0-340-045; 667-0-340-055; 667-0-340-075; 667-0-340- 085; 667-0-340-095; 667-0-340-105; 667-0-340-125; 667-0-340- 135; 667-0-340-145; 667-0-340-155; 667-0-340-185; 667-0-340- 195; APPLICANT: THOUSAND OAKS MASTER LLC]
WHEREAS, on September 8, 2025, the Planning Commission considered the proposed project, generally located at the intersection of Conejo Center Drive and Rancho Conejo Boulevard, received testimony, and voted 4-0 certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (2022-70771-EIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, approving two Vesting Tentative Tract Maps (2019- 70440-VTTM and 2019-70441-VTTM), a Development Permit (2019-70439-DP), Protected Tree Permit (2021-71158-PTP), and Uniform Sign Program (2019- 70442-USP); and
WHEREAS, on September 11, 2025, Brian Flynn of Lozeau Drury on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) appealed the Planning Commission decision to City Council, requesting that City Council reverse the decision of the Planning Commission thereby denying the project; and WHEREAS, on September 17, 2025, Christina Caro of Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo on behalf of Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”) appealed the Planning Commission decision to City Council, requesting that City Council reverse the decision of the Planning Commission thereby denying the project; and
WHEREAS, on October 7, 2025, a Notice of City Council Public Hearing was published in the “Ventura County Star,” a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Thousand Oaks and was mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the subject property; and
cdd:420-46/sk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2025/2025-10-21/Shapell/Staff Report-City Council/pz/(FILE ID:
2019-70439-DP)
5 2
5 8
WHEREAS, on October 7, 2025, a Notice of Hearing sign was posted on the subject property; and
WHEREAS, upon notice duly given, a public hearing on the appeals was held by the City Council of the City of Thousand Oaks on October 21, 2025, at which time the appellants were present and testified, and evidence, both oral and written, including but not limited to City Staff Reports, were presented and received, and testimony was heard from all interested parties appearing in the matter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated the information and finds that the proposed project complies with the City’s standards, codes, and policies; and the Planning Commission’s decision to approve 2022-70771-EIR, 2019-70440- VTTM, 2019-70441-VTTM, 2019-70439-DP, 2021-71158-PTP, 2019-70442-USP, and 2019-70443-LPC is appropriate and lawful; and
WHEREAS, a resolution is required to formalize City Council action pursuant to Section 9-4.2808 of the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code and this Resolution is adopted for that purpose and reflects the action of a majority of the members of the City Council in rendering a decision on this matter following the regular meeting of October 21, 2025.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Thousand Oaks, that the appeals of the Planning Commission decision for 2022- 70771-EIR, 2019-70440-VTTM, 2019-70441-VTTM, 2019-70439-DP, 2021- 71158-PTP, 2019-70442-USP, and 2019-70443-LPC are denied, and the Planning Commission decision contained in Resolution 12-2025 PC dated September 8, 2025, incorporated herein by reference, is upheld.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of October, 2025, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
_______________________________
David Newman, Mayor
City of Thousand Oaks, California
ATTEST/CERTIFY:
_________________________________
Laura B. Maguire, City Clerk
Date Attested: ___________________
cdd:420-46/sk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2025/2025-10-21/Shapell/Staff Report-City Council/pz/(FILE ID:
2019-70439-DP)
5 2
5 8
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
_________________________________
Tracy M. Noonan, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO ADMINISTRATION:
_________________________________
Andrew P. Powers, City Manager
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the City of Thousand Oaks City Council on the date cited above.