Attachment 11 - Public Correspondence — Thousand Oaks City Council, June 23, 2026

Outlook
FW: Density concerns
From Katie Morris <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 9:43 AM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Laura Maguire <[email protected]>
FYI
Fr
om: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 9:40 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Density concerns
Another letter for the record.

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Gary Abrams <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2026 11:03 PM
To: Mikey Taylor <[email protected]>; Bob Engler <[email protected]>; Al Adam <[email protected]>; Tie Gutierrez <[email protected]>; David Newman <[email protected]> Subject: Density concerns
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Thousand Oaks City Council
This is to express our displeasure with any plans to build large multi-family buildings in the cit
y as proposed.

Please do all you can to maintain low density in Thousand Oaks as proscribed by the founders.

ATTACHMENT #11
Thank you

Gary Abrams

Mara Abrams

3311 Mountain Trail Av
Newbury Park

Outlook
Fw: Stop the growth.

From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Thu 5/21/2026 9:54 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Sherry Adkins <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 9:47 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Stop the growth.

[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Go back to the plan for limited growth in conejo. This is not downtown Los Angeles. Traffic is already awful. Many empty storefronts. Crowded hospital, crowded streets. We don’t want this. Some people are trying to make lots of money and then leave us with the mess.

STOP IT.

Sent from my iPad

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: my opposing email in regards to the proposed project From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 8:21 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Tara Alexandra <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 8:12 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: my opposing email in regards to the proposed project

I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the proposed development of a large-scale shopping center in the Conejo Valley, modeled after something like Old Town Pasadena.

I was born and raised here and I’m in my mid 50s now, and I chose to raise my own children in this community for a reason. What has always made the Conejo Valley special is its small-town feel — even as it has grown over the years, it has managed to retain a sense of charm, safety, and community that is increasingly rare. That is precisely what has kept families like mine here for generations.

The introduction of a major shopping destination of this scale threatens to fundamentally change the character of our community. Quite frankly, the last thing we need is to become a regional draw that brings in heavy traffic, congestion, and overdevelopment. Many of us already avoid traveling over the Calabasas grade because of the congestion — it is deeply concerning to think that similar conditions could be created right here in our own backyard.
it is Paramount. The city has proper evacuation plans as well, which we clearly do not which has been more than

CITY OF HOUSAND OAKS
I UQNl S E SERVICE
evident in the previous fires. The amount of people that are proposed to be living in this project will only add to the danger of the community safety.

We also have a significant number of apartment developments. This raises a simple but important question: who exactly is this project meant to serve?
Additionally, the character of the area has changed in recent years. Since COVID, many residents have noticed an increase in crime and theft. A development of this magnitude would inevitably draw more outside traffic and attention, which may further strain our local resources and impact the safety and quality of life that residents value so highly.

It is difficult not to feel that projects like this are driven more by financial interests than by the well-being of the community. Decisions that will permanently alter the fabric of the Conejo Valley should not be made without fully considering the long-term impact on the people who live here — many of whom, like myself, have deep roots in this area.

I remember when Thousand Oaks Boulevard didn’t even extend all the way to Kanan Road. Back then, you had to get on the freeway and exit at Kanan just to reach the grocery stores. While growth is inevitable, there is a difference between thoughtful development and overdevelopment that erodes the very qualities that made this community desirable in the first place.

We have already seen significant changes in parts of Agoura Hills, Westlake Village, and Thousand Oaks. Many residents feel that the balance has already begun to shift. Adding a project of this scale risks tipping it too far.

Finally, the impact on traffic cannot be overstated. Thousand Oaks Boulevard is not designed to handle the level of congestion that a destination shopping center would bring. We do not want — nor are we equipped — to become another Ventura Boulevard. Increased congestion will affect daily life, emergency response times, and overall livability.

I urge you to carefully reconsider this proposal and to prioritize the voices of the residents who have long called this area home. Growth should enhance a community, not overwhelm it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.
would somebody kindly respond confirming receipt of this email and that thiswill be sent to the proper person as my opposing email before the June 23 meeting.

Tara Bitton
Outlook
FW: June 23rd Agenda/ Downtown Project
From City Clerk Department <cityclerk@toaks .gov>
Date Thu 6/18/2026 1 :34 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Akbar Alikhan <AAlikhan@toaks .gov> From: Cheryl Anabell <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2026 1:33 PM
To: City Clerk Department <cityclerk@toaks .gov>
Subject: June 23rd Agenda/ Downtown Project
You don't often get email from [email protected] . Learn whx this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern;
I am 100% AGAINST the proposed downtown project.

I have lived in Newbury Park/ Thousand Oaks for 20+ years and moved here out of the San Fernando Valley to have fresh air, less traffic, less crime.

Please don't ruin our nice environment.

With thanks,
Cheryl Anabell
805-207-6613
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: OPPOSED DEVELOPMENT
FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 7:56 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
(805) 449-2500

From: Krista Anderson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 6:38 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: OPPOSED DEVELOPMENT

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Krista Anderson-Moller. I am a resident of Newbury Park. I highly oppose this new development that is proposed on Thousand Oaks blvd near the Civic Center. Aren't Oak trees protected by law in this city? How are they just going to rip them all out without harm? Many people that have lived here for years including my grandparents who are opposed to any new development that will bring more people. This isnt justified when people are leaving the city because everything is so expensive. Bringing in low income scum from other cities isn't gonna make Thousand Oaks better. It's going to destroy it. Instead, can we talk about leaving the theater and putting in things that people that already live here can do? Why not a park, a community garden, farm, or another high school? Newbury Park high students are parking along Reino and are invading my neighborhood because the school has badically no parking for students.

I really hope there is a plan to widen the freeway especially since the lane is already there and the traffic is already ridiculous. We need to fix the problems we have first before we create new ones.

Thank you,
Krista
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Strict Adherence to Measure E
FromLaura Maguire <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 9:04 AM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Katie Morris <[email protected]>

From: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 9:03 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Strict Adherence to Measure E

Can you add this one to the record as well

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Wynter Barker <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 3:19 PM
To: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Subject: Strict Adherence to Measure E

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

With all the new high-density projects being thrown out there and a push to make our once beautiful area look like the SFV by building up and blocking the beautiful open space and mountains, I urge the City Council to adhere to Measure E height ordinances and tree preservation/protection.

I know Sacramento has building requirements, but with a declining population in California, it would be nice if our City Council worked for us and perhaps questioned the push for more building by Sacramento.

I’ve been here for 33 years and miss the days of “save our open spaces”, slow growth, etc. I don’t think the vast majority of the council’s constituents voted for high-density skylines, traffic and the loss of our small town feel.

I appreciate your taking the time to read this and perhaps taking into consideration the opinions of the area residents.

Very truly yours,

Wynter Barker,
Legal Secretary to Robert J. Stoll, III, Esq.

PLEASE NOTE: This email address is NOT a service address. Documents served to this address are not deemed served. The only service address is [email protected].

The Stoll Law Firm
308 East Carrillo Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Tel: (805)963-0006
Fax: (310)5754353

SERVICE ADDRESS: [email protected]

Outlook
Fw: Downtown Thousand Oaks Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 10:04 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Barrett, Julia <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 10:00 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Thousand Oaks Project

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good Morning

I attended the city council meeting via zoom and am completely opposed to this project.

Thousand Oaks does not want or need a project of this size on Thousand Oaks Boulevard.

The traffic congestion and the over crowding of Los Robles hospital will be horrendous.

And with this will come more crime -
Why so tall ? what happened to the cap on how large a building in our city could be ?

Ridiculous I am sorry.

We are not and never want to be the San Fernando Valley.

Please stop the crazy and let us maintain our area.

Julia Barrett
Mobile +1 (818) 294-0798

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE

Outlook
Fw: THOUSAND OAKS BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:10 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Mindy Beardsley <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2026 10:47 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]>; City General Email Account <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: THOUSAND OAKS BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, I am writing as a resident of Thousand Oaks to formally express my opposition to the proposed mixed-use development on Thousand Oaks Boulevard. While I understand the city has housing and development goals to meet, I believe this project, as proposed, raises serious concerns that have not been adequately addressed.

Besides the sheer magnitude of this project (height is far too tall for this area as well, our primary concerns should be:

Traﬃc Impact. Thousand Oaks Boulevard already experiences signiﬁcant congestion during peak hours. Adding a development of this density will further strain an already overburdened corridor, with downstream eﬀects on surrounding residential streets and emergency response times.

Fire Evacuation. Thousand Oaks sits in a high ﬁre hazard severity zone, and recent regional ﬁres have made clear how quickly conditions can deteriorate. I have seen no credible evacuation plan accompanying this proposal.

Concentrating this much additional population along a single corridor — one that would also be the evacuation route — creates a foreseeable public safety risk that the city has an obligation to take seriously.

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Protected Oak Trees and Wildlife Habitat. Thousand Oaks is named for its oaks, and our municipal code reﬂects the community's long-standing commitment to protecting them. Removing protected oak trees and displacing the wildlife that depends on them is not a trade-oﬀ that should be made lightly. But the impact extends well beyond oak-dependent species. Developments of this scale fragment the broader wildlife corridor that runs through our region — the same corridor the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing is being built, at enormous public and private expense, to protect. It would be inconsistent, to say the least, for our city to approve dense development that further fragments habitat while regional partners are investing heavily to restore connectivity for the very animals this project would displace.

Community Character. Our city has worked hard to maintain a semi-rural, low-density character that distinguishes it from the denser communities to the south. A project of this density and scale would meaningfully erode that character and set a precedent for future development that residents did not sign up for when they chose to live here.

I respectfully ask that the Council and Commission either reject this proposal or require substantial revisions that address traﬃc mitigation, a concrete and credible evacuation plan, full preservation of protected oaks and wildlife corridor connectivity, and a scale more consistent with the surrounding area.

You should also look at the development on High Street in Moorpark. This has been completed for a while and I see no retail and/or tenants in this space. It is a ghost town.

Thank you for your time and for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Mindy Beardsley
1118 Bright Glen Circle, Westlake Village CA 91362
[email protected] / 310.614.8384

Outlook
Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Downtown Thousand Oaks Project FromTara Alexandra <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/2/2026 12:32 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the proposed development of a large-scale shopping center in the Conejo Valley, modeled after something like Old Town Pasadena.

Beyond traffic concerns, there are practical issues that cannot be ignored. We already have hotels in the area that sit empty much of the time. Restaurants struggle to stay open, with many closing due to lack of consistent patronage. We also have a significant number of apartment developments. This raises a simple but important question: who exactly is this project meant to serve?
Additionally, the character of the area has changed in recent years. Since COVID, many residents have noticed an increase in crime and theft. A development of this magnitude would inevitably draw more outside traffic and attention, which may further strain our local resources and impact the safety and quality of life that residents value so highly.

I urge you to carefully reconsider this proposal and to prioritize the voices of the residents who have long called this area home. Growth should enhance a community, not overwhelm it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.
would somebody kindly respond confirming receipt of this email and that this will be sent to the proper person as my opposing email before the June 23 meeting.

Tara Bitton
On Jun 2, 2026, at 11:53 AM, Krystin Rice <[email protected]> wrote:

PLEASE NOTE: Our domain has changed to TOAKS.GOV. Please update your records as needed.

Hello,
You are receiving this email because you previously expressed interest in the Downtown Thousand Oaks Project.

The project is scheduled to be heard by City Council on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. Please see the attached Notice of Public Hearing for additional details.

Thank you,
Krystin Rice
Planning Division Manager
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
805-449-2335
<Outlook-hdcxfqm2.png>
<NOH_DP-2025-70015, GP, SP, TTM, SUP, PTP, EIR Downtown Project _M06022026 - 21-day Notice Only.pdf>
Outlook
FW: can somebody please submit this for the June 23 city council meeting? FromLaura Maguire <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 10:26 AM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Katie Morris <[email protected]>

From: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 10:21 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: can somebody please submit this for the June 23 city council meeting?

Another letter

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Tara Bitton <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2026 10:45 AM
To: Mikey Taylor <[email protected]>; Bob Engler <[email protected]>; Al Adam <[email protected]>; Tie Gutierrez <[email protected]>
Subject: can somebody please submit this for the June 23 city council meeting?

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the proposed development of a large-scale shopping center in the Conejo Valley, modeled after something like Old Town Pasadena.

Additionally, the character of the area has changed in recent years. Since COVID, many residents have noticed an increase in crime and theft. A development of this magnitude would inevitably draw more outside traffic and attention, which may further strain our local resources and impact the safety and quality of life that residents value so highly.

We have already seen significant changes in parts of Agoura Hills, Westlake Village, and Thousand Oaks.

Many residents feel that the balance has already begun to shift. Adding a project of this scale risks tipping it too far.

I urge you to carefully reconsider this proposal and to prioritize the voices of the residents who have long called this area home. Growth should enhance a community, not overwhelm it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

would somebody kindly respond confirming receipt of this email and that thiswill be sent to the proper person as my opposing email before the June 23 meeting.

Tara Bitton
Outlook
FW: Please Vote No on the Civic Arts Plaza Redevelopment Proposal FromLaura Maguire <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 10:03 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]> Cc Katie Morris <[email protected]>

From: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 10:00 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Please Vote No on the Civic Arts Plaza Redevelopment Proposal

For the record...

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Bob Bushnell <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 12:01 PM
To: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Subject: Please Vote No on the Civic Arts Plaza Redevelopment Proposal

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Councilman Engler,
I am writing to respectfully urge you to vote against the proposed Civic Arts Plaza redevelopment project on June 23, 2026.

I am not opposed to development, redevelopment, or additional housing in Thousand Oaks. Growth is inevitable, and thoughtful redevelopment can strengthen our community. My concern is that this particular proposal is simply too large, too tall, too dense, and too dependent on exceptions to the General Plan for such a prominent civic site.

Many of us chose to live in Thousand Oaks because of its open space, natural beauty, oak trees, and low- rise development. The proposed project departs significantly from those values.

Why does Thousand Oaks need a seven-story, 142-room hotel at this location? Why does it need a seven- story mixed-use apartment building containing 161 units, of which only 26 are designated as affordable housing? Isn’t Sacramento’s housing push all about making housing affordable for lower-income residents?
Both buildings exceed the General Plan's 75-foot height limit and require significant variances. If developments of this scale can routinely receive exceptions to long-established standards, residents are left wondering whether the protections contained in the General Plan still have meaning. The issue is not whether Thousand Oaks should grow, but whether growth should occur in a manner that respects the community character and planning principles that residents have supported for decades.

I am also concerned about traffic, parking, and public safety. The development could accommodate approximately 1,200 people through a combination of residents, hotel guests, employees, visitors, and patrons. Many residents believe the project does not provide adequate parking, which will inevitably increase congestion and spillover parking in surrounding areas.

Most importantly, Thousand Oaks remains a high fire-risk community. During a major wildfire evacuation, Thousand Oaks Boulevard serves as a critical route to the limited freeway access points available to residents. Adding a project of this size and intensity raises legitimate concerns about evacuation capacity and emergency response. Public safety should be given greater weight in evaluating this proposal.

Finally, many residents feel that significant public opposition has been acknowledged but not genuinely considered. The City Council's responsibility is not simply to approve development, but to balance housing needs, public safety, environmental stewardship, quality of life, and the long-term vision of our community.

I respectfully ask you to vote no on this proposal and direct staff to pursue alternatives that better reflect the character of Thousand Oaks, respect the intent of the General Plan, and address the concerns repeatedly raised by residents.

Thank you for your consideration and your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Bob Bushnell
A Forty-year Resident of Thousand Oaks

Outlook
FW: June 23 meeting re downtown plan
From City Clerk Department <[email protected]>
Date Thu 6/18/2026 8:34 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]> -----Original Message-----
From: Karen Blum <[email protected]>
Sent Wednesday, June 17, 2026 10:27 PM
To: City Clerk Department <cityclerk@toaks .gov>
Subject: June 23 meeting re downtown plan
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at htt12s://aka .ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Thousand Oaks has always been known and respected for its suburb feel and sense of community.

The plan to build multi-story residential and shopping area on TO Blvd is not necessary and will simply add to traffic and our changing reputation.

My recommendation is to consider a plan that instead revitalizes the area between the 2 malls.

There is a huge parking lot and the old nursery that are completely abandoned now along with the hotel that was to be a homeless shelter.

This area would not create an eye sore of apts like the hideous parking structure approved in Agoura off the 101 near Kanan.

I would like to see more services for Seniors. Their needs are completely ignored in most plans and as the community ages, apartments that are modified will be a necessity.

Restaurants, an outdoor space, and park are needed in the neighborhood near Thousand Oaks and Moorpark Road.

The area near City Hall has proven that people don't want to live right up against a freeway. The shopping, new apartment building and mini-mall are not busy enough to support addition Please reconsider where we put a "downtown." And if we really need it or if our community is better served by spacing out the shopping, housing and entertainment to assure all residents have what they need in their own neighborhood.

Thank you,
Karen Blum
2236 Glastonbury Rd
Thousand Oaks, CA 91361
Sent from my iPhone
Outlook
Fw: Downtown Thousand Oaks project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:08 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Kent Brizendine <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 8:47 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Thousand Oaks project

Please reconsider these enormous buildings. They are totally out of character for our community. I grew up here. My family moved here in 1972 and I love this area because it still feels like a small community despite huge growth over the years. I feel this project will destroy that small town feeling.

Thank you,
Kent Brizendine
Sent from my iPhone

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Resounding NO NO NO to the Downtown Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 9:49 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Cc Lori Goor <[email protected]>
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Donna Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 9:48 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Resounding NO NO NO to the Downtown Project

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Count me in to the growing number of residents opposed to the proposed Thousand Oaks downtown development. Are you mad to think this is a good idea for our safe and happy city? This will bring way too much traffic to our streets and freeways, clogging what is already a mess during traffic. It's already bad on the 101 between the grade and the 23 at all times. The development at the old KMart on Hampshire will be a nightmare, too. I live very close to there and dread when it's done. Please stop this madness and don't destroy our city and turn it into Orange county.

Donna
Cl Y OF' HOUSA.IND OAKS
TO I

VIRTUAL L AN O USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Comments on Proposed Development
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:28 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: BRIAN Cable <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2026 11:58 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Cc: BRIAN Cable <[email protected]>; Ann <[email protected]> Subject: Comments on Proposed Development

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

It appears that officials in the City of Thousand Oaks are catering to developers and themselves at the expense of its citizens! One must ask, will the proposed development serve the needs of Thousand Oaks residents or the city and developer’s coffers?
It seems the latter. I’d like to see the economic/benefits analysis that was conducted on behalf of the city and developers. What are the benefits to the citizens of Thousand Oaks?
Spencer and Ann Cable
TO resident since 2001

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Proposed downtown project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:07 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Michelle Milazzo <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 7:43 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Proposed downtown project

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

We expect you to do the right thing and vote no on this project. This community is already suffering from too much traffic, congested streets, and most importantly, lack of medical facilities and hospitals. It is completely irresponsible to introduce more traffic and crime into an already over populated Thousand Oaks. I will BE at the meeting on 6-23 and will encourage as many people as I can to do the same. Hillcrest Road is not equipped to handle the traffic it will receive by taking sections of thousand oaks boulevard away.

Michelle Milazzo Cerbini

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Giant Downtown Thousand Oaks Project-Please Deny
FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 7:57 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
(805) 449-2500

From: Patti Chamberlin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 7:52 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Giant Downtown Thousand Oaks Project-Please Deny

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,

To whom it may concern:

The proposal to build a little city on Thousand Oaks Boulevard does not fit the needs of our city. We already have two giant developments going up in Newbury Park, and the traffic is already bad. We don't need more.

Thanks for your consideration.

Patti Chamberlin

From: Feather Corsair <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 12:34 PM
To: City General Email Account <[email protected]>
Subject: Growth


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02368kYHporZFcAGRP9Fv89d67AyYDjB6DKCH9wof2EQrLGosCFw xJV19aeEQsmy55l&id=61579455874372&post_id=61579455874372_pfbid02368kYHporZFcAGRP9Fv89d67AyYDjB6DKCH 9wof2EQrLGosCFwxJV19aeEQsmy55l&mibextid=Nif5oz

Please dont LA our TO.

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important IZl
Outlook
FW: Downtown Project
From City Clerk Department <[email protected]>
Date Thu 6/18/2026 9:21 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]> -----Original Message-----
From: GARY ANDERSON <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2026 8:53 AM
To: City Clerk Department <cityclerk@toaks .gov>
Subject: Downtown Project
[You don't often get email from andrsn@verizon .net. Learn why this is important at htt12s://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

The project on the June 23 agenda for the Downtown Project, I am opposed to it. It is to large. I don't believe we need another City Hall either.

Diane R. Anderson
2656 W. Great Smokey Ct.
[email protected]
Outlook
Fw: Downtown Project
FromCity General Email Account <[email protected]>
Date Wed 6/10/2026 5:02 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Alexandra South <[email protected]> Cc Laura Maguire <[email protected]>; Katie Morris <[email protected]> Hello,
FWD this email that came in from a resident regarding the downtown project.

Thank you,
Jessica Lopez
Administrative Aide
City Manager’s Office
(805) 449-2190

From: Jean Dolan <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 4:57 PM
To: City General Email Account <[email protected]>
Subject: Downtown Project

To City Council Members:

Please do not approve a the proposed change to building height (4 to 7) to accommodate the current plans for Downtown project.

Please do not succumb to development that will ruin the special place that TO is today.

This is a beautiful, rural community is sought after for its unique feel.

Seven story buildings will not enhance that feel. If you open the window to height changes, density, lack of parking standards TO will become the San Fernando Valley.

Does the council really want that?
Thank you for your consideration.

Jean M. Dolan
805.444.2861
Outlook
FW: Downtown Project
FromCity Clerk Department <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 10:27 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]> -----Original Message-----
From: Laura Donahue <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 10:15 AM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk Department <[email protected]>
Subject: Downtown Project
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Sent from my iPad
Dear City Council,
Our family of 4 moved to the Thousand Oaks community in 1992. My husband and I raised our two children in Newbury Park where they thrived not only in the local schools, played on various sports teams, went off to college and made life long friends from TO. Our daughter and her family have relocated to Texas but our son and his family recently moved back to Thousand Oaks!
We all love our community, our neighbors and the physical beauty of the area. However, there was always something lacking from our city. We never had a true downtown area for Thousand Oaks. Over the 30+ years we have lived here, we often heard of plans for such an area but this never came to fruition…..always just talk! I believe this well thought out downtown project, that you are considering, will improve our city. Thousand Oaks needs a city center not only for our present citizens but for our future generations. We need our city to not just survive for today, but look ahead and thrive tomorrow!
Thank you,
Laura Donahue
Newbury Park
Outlook
FW: NO 7 STORY BUILDINGS
FromLaura Maguire <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 8:59 AM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Katie Morris <[email protected]>

From: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 8:56 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: NO 7 STORY BUILDINGS

ANOTHER LETTER

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Valerie Duda <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 11:06 PM
To: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Subject: NO 7 STORY BUILDINGS

The only people who want seven story buildings out here are the ones that are going to financially profit from it. Those of us who live here, including me since 1969 do not want high-rise buildings. If you want high-rise buildings then move to the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles. Stop chasing the dollars.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
Outlook
downtown planning
Fromadonna ebrahimi <[email protected]>
Date Mon 5/18/2026 5:18 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Cc Downtown <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Members of the Planning Commission,
My name is Adonna Ebrahimi and I am a visual artist that resides in Thousand Oaks. I am writing to express my strong support for the Downtown Thousand Oaks Project.

I have lived in thousand oaks for more than 27 years. Currently I have had the priviledge to be an incubator artist and couldn't be more thrilled of that support. The arts are a central part of my life, and I have attended so many events at the Performing Arts Center. I always leave inspired, and uplifted. It is my opinion that art heals. As a working artist, I do hope that this project moves forward.

This project represents an opportunity to build a downtown that reflects the real identity of our city — one where arts, culture, and community life are at the center. The proposed Artist Incubator, Public Market, outdoor amphitheater, and new performance venue are exactly the kinds of spaces that bring people together, support local businesses, and give residents a reason to stay, gather, and invest in this place.

Thousand Oaks has the cultural assets. This project gives them the home they deserve.

I urge the Commission to move this project forward.

Adonna Ebrahimi
1435 Geyser Ct.

Thousand Oaks
www.artistrybyadonna.co
Outlook
comments on proposed downtown project
FromElizabeth Brown <[email protected]>
Date Tue 5/19/2026 7:16 PM
To Community Development Department <[email protected]> You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Thank you for providing the opportunity to give feedback on the proposed Downtown Project which will be discussed and voted on at a June city council meeting.

While I support the intention of re-vitalizing Thousand Oaks Blvd. and creating a ‘downtown’ vibe, I am concerned and dismayed at the inclusion of several multi-story buildings, hotels, etc… included in the proposal, not to mention a new city hall. Really??? After all the funding that has already gone into updating and renovating the current ’new’ city hall??? We have so much unused/vacant commercial space already on the boulevard and throughout the city that could be revitalized. Adding new multi-level, multi-use buildings just doesn’t seem necessary or prudent. As a city we’ve been committed to maintaining our open space and trail systems, keeping hilltops free of development and being prudent in how our city growth is managed. Adding high rise hotels and businesses is not - in my opinion - wise or in keeping with the balanced approach to growth that has served us well for many years. Surely there is a different direction we could take to provide additional affordable housing without turning our city into another multiplex/shopping mecca that blocks out the beauty of the Conejo Valley we’ve worked so hard to preserve and maintain.

Thank you for listening and considering my feedback. As 30+ year residents of Thousand Oaks, it’s been a wonderful place to raise a family, enjoy the outdoors and thrive. May it continue to be so.

Elizabeth Brown
Thousand Oaks CA
Outlook
Fw: Keep our small town small
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 11:22 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Chelsea Elizabeth <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 11:15 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Keep our small town small

Please consider downsizing this project. The overcrowding we will experience with the upcoming developments will turn our small town into the San Fernando Valley. Please stop the building and the crowds

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Over Development
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:14 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Bill FIGGE <ﬁ[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2026 5:53 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Over Development

Thousand Oaks City Manager and Team.

Most people living in the Conejo Valley and adjacent moved her to enjoy its low density, non-urban environment and the improved health and life style.

I’m 77 years old, grew up in the San Fernando Valley and relate to the unacceptable growth and subsequent deterioration that has occurred. While I’m in favor of affordable housing, the recent Developments being projected does not appear to address that need.

Pleass pause these grand developments until you have concrete plans to address the infrastructure, safety and quality of life issues. Please listen to the people.

Respectfully, Bill Figge (805) 300-0033

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Downtown Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:07 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: GARY ANDERSON <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 7:15 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Project

I am opposed to the Downtown Project. First the City dose not need another City Hall, I have lived here for over 49 years and have seen many City Halls and this was suppose to be the ‘Best”. The projects density does not work for the Thousand Oaks environment. This is not downtown Los Angeles. No Downtown Project.

Diane R. Anderson
[email protected]

CITY OF HOUSAND OAKS
I UQNl S E SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Downtown Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:08 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Elaine Gewirtz <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2026 9:37 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Project

City Manager:

I oppose the proposed Downtown Project because we don’t need any more congestion on our main thoroughfare and increased population located in a small area. .

With regular seasons of fire danger, evacuation, and safety routes, our priority now should be on emergency outlets.

I’m sure there are other uses for this plot of land that are more sensible and will not pose a danger to our community.

Elaine Waldorf Gewirtz - TO resident since 1972.
2243 Kelmscott Court
Westlake Village, California. 91361

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Scale back
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Thu 5/21/2026 4:32 PM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Martha Gibson <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 11:40 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Scale back

Please scale back the new downtown project. It’s going to be a traffic nightmare. 5 stories max!! Sent from my iPhone

CITY OF HOUSAND OAKS
I UQNl S E SERVICE

BOARD OFFICERS
Chair
Ken Trigueiro
People’s Self -Help Housing Corp.

Vice Chair
Elenore Vaughn
Housing Authority of the City of
Santa Paula
Treasurer
Karen Flock
Housing Authority of the City of
San Buenaventura
Secretary
Derrick Wada
Cabrillo Economic Development
Corporation
Former Chair
Tracy McAulay
County of Ventura
Chair -Housing Land Trust Ventura
County
Alex Russell
Homes & Hope
Chair Emeritus
Dawn Dyer
Dyer Sheehan Group, Inc.

Advisor
Mary Ann Krause, AICP
Urban Planner

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Elsa Brown
City of Oxnard
Maruja Clensay
City of San Buenaventura
Garry Collett
California Commercial Investment
Group
Angel Garcia
County of Ventura
Sarah McCarthy -Garcia
McCarthy Companies
Anthony Mireles
Laborers Int’l Union Local 585
Sean Morreale
Bank Executive
Cathi Nye
V.C. Office of Education
Lynn Oshita
City of Thousand Oaks
Stratis Perros
City of Simi Valley
Mark Pettit
Architect

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Linda Braunschweiger
June 15, 2026
Mayor Mikey Taylor and Thousand Oaks City Council Members 2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
RE: Support for the Downtown Thousand Oaks Project
Dear Mayor Taylor and Thousand Oaks City Council Members, The Housing Trust Fund Ventura County is pleased to e xpress our support for the Downtown project, which represents an important opportunity to advance housing, economic vitality, and a more connected community for future generations. Our mission is to support the creation and preservation of affordable housing for our region’s workforce
by leveraging public-private pa rtnerships to provide low-cost, flexible loans early in the housing development cycle. Th is project represents a critical step in addressing the "missing middle" housing crisis that
persists across Ventura County.

The Downtown Project is a model for how we can create high-q uality housing for our local workforce without relying solely on limited public grant funding. By utilizing a smart density approach, the pr oject is set to deliver nearly a quarter of its units for low-income residents, those earning between $84,000 and $119,750. These are the teachers, public safety officers, and healthcare professionals who are the backbone of Thousand Oaks but are increasingly priced out of the community they serve. Creating this specific tier of housing is notoriously difficult, a nd this project provides a viable path to a chieving it through private i
nvestment.

This development offers a rare opportunity to build a walkable, inclusive downtown that allows our workforce to live near their jobs. We urge the Planning Commission to recommend approval, ensuring that Thousand
Oaks is a leader in solving the housing challenges facing our region.

Sincerely,
Linda Braunschweiger, CEO
Housing Trust Fund Ventura County
and Housing Land Trust Ventura
County
Everyone deserves a home
Housing Trust Fund VENTURA COUNTY
a Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI)
805-384-1144 I 360 Mobil Avenue, Suite 213A, Camarillo, CA 93010 I www.HousingTrustFundVC.org 501c3 nonprofit tax id# 45-3191747
Outlook
OBJECTION to a "downtown Thousand Oaks"
[email protected] <[email protected]>
Date Tue 5/26/2026 11:16 PM
To [email protected] <[email protected]>; Downtown <[email protected]> You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
5-26-26

To: Thousand Oaks Planning Commission and ALL related parties:

This is Julie Land writing to you. I have lived in Thousand Oaks for almost 40 years and have seen its growth, meaning ever- increasing traﬃc and density. For this reason, I strongly OBJECT to the development of a “downtown Thousand Oaks.” Please halt any and all plans for such a development.

We do not need any seven-story buildings, whether residential, commercial, or hotel-related. The result of such over- development would seem a detriment to air quality and to other measures of health. Again, please VETO this plan!

Thank you very much,
Julie Land (805) 390-2537

Outlook
FW: Downtown City Project
From Akbar Alikhan <AAlikhan@toaks .gov>
Date Wed 6/17/2026 10:02 PM
To City Clerk Department <cityclerk@toaks .gov>
Cc Krystin Rice < [email protected]>
From: Cindy Liu <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2026 at 9:02 PM
To: City General Email Account <city@toaks .gov>
Cc: Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>
Subject: Downtown City Project
You don't often get email from [email protected] . Learn why this is imP-ortant CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council Members,
I'm writing in support of the Thousand Oaks Downtown Project. From its inception , city staff and project leaders have actively sought input from the disability community . Along with caregivers and advocates, I participated in a listening session organized by Akbar and city staff, where I spoke directly with the architects and designers about making this project truly accessible - addressing not just physical access, but also sensory needs and the psychological impact of city design on persons with disabilities.

One key design change that resulted from that session was the relocation of the elevator. It was moved front and center, next to the staircase, and the switchbacks were removed. This is a significant design choice, and I want to convey what it means to the disability community : it signals genuine belonging . Persons with disabilities no longer have to search for a back entrance down a poorly lit hallway - we can enter through the front, with dignity , alongside everyone else.

Another important change was moving away from decomposed granite (DG) hardscape. DG is extremely difficult to navigate in a wheelchair - something I'd encourage you to experience firsthand if you haven't.

Looking ahead to the interior, I hope the same thoughtful approach continues. Specific features worth prioritizing include: adult changing tables in the restrooms; modular handrails and handles; elevator buttons that accommodate a range of heights and mobility needs; sensory-safe spaces for auditory or visual breaks; interior materials that absorb rather than amplify sound; counters and service areas at wheelchair height; free wheelchair or mobility rentals, and other universal design features throughout.

Finally, as this new downtown takes shape, I urge the city to also invest in workforce development for persons with disabilities. The unemployment rate for this community is approximately 80%, and our local school district is falling short in preparing the next generation - only 11 % of students with disabilities are considered College and Career Ready, based on the district's own state reporting.

I am genuinely encouraged by how thoughtfully this project has responded to community feedback. Please keep it up, and please continue reaching out to me - I am eager to remain part of this conversation . I've lived in Thousand Oaks for nearly 20 years and I'm raising two kids, one with a disability . I want a city center that is welcoming and inclusive to BOTH of my kids, and me when I'm older and greyer.:-) Inclusion begins at the design phase. The Downtown Project is a powerful example of that principle in action.

Thank you!
With gratitude,
Cindy
Cindy Liu
Founder, WeBelong: Everywhere & LooHoo's Enterprises
TEDx/Public Speaker I Advocate/Board Member !Impact Entrepreneur $ www.webelong-everywhere.org
• lnstagram I Facebook I YouTube I Substack
, Based in California - Working Nationwide
What if employment for people with disabilities wasn't the exception, but the norm? At WeBelong and LooHoo's, we're not waiting for systems to catch up. We're building them with and for our community. From public safety to inclusive college to cooperative ownership we belong everywhere! Ask me how.

James Malch
4231 Greenwood St
Newbury Park, CA 91320
[email protected]
805-338-6043

May 19, 2026

City of Thousand Oaks
Planning Commission / City Council
2100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362

Re: My strong opposition to the Civic Arts Plaza Redevelopment

Dear Planning Commissioners and City Council Members,

I am writing as a resident of Thousand Oaks to express my strong opposition to the proposed Downtown Thousand Oaks redevelopment project at the Civic Arts Plaza site.

This ambitious plan—including up to 7-story buildings, a 142-key hotel, over 240 residential units (mixed-income), new commercial/retail space, a reconfigured City Hall, and extensive infrastructure changes—represents an inappropriate scale and intensity of development for our city and this particular area.

While I appreciate the desire to create a vibrant downtown and enhanced cultural amenities, this proposal will fundamentally alter the character of Thousand Oaks in ways that many of us residents do not support.

My key concerns include:

Thousand Oaks has long prided itself on a balanced, suburban quality of life with open spaces and a sense of community. Introducing high-density, urban- scale buildings (including 7-story structures) near Highway 101 and existing residential areas would urbanize the Civic Arts Plaza in a way that feels out of place and will set a precedent for further large-scale development.

The area already experiences significant traffic along Thousand Oaks Boulevard and this area on the freeway.

I urge the Planning Commission and the City Council to reject or at a minimum scale back this proposal. Alternatives could include more modest enhancements to the existing Civic Arts Plaza—focusing on better pedestrian access, preservation of open space and trees, and targeted improvements—without high-density housing, a large hotel, or tall buildings that change the skyline and neighborhood feel.

Thousand Oaks residents value quality of life, environmental management, and thoughtful growth that respects our history and present surroundings.

This project, as currently proposed, does not come close to achieving that balance.

Please prioritize preserving what makes our city special over transforming it into a denser Downtown.

Thank you for considering my comments. I respectfully request that this letter be included in the public record for the project.

Sincerely,

James Malch
Concerned Resident of Thousand Oaks

Outlook
Fw: Opposition to TO downtown project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:19 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2026 6:22 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Opposition to TO downtown project

I am a 30 year resident of Thousand Oaks. My property taxes matter and I do not support them being used for the 7-seven story buildings proposed near the civic arts plaza. Please look at revitalizing the area with the rural nature of our city. I already lived in the San Fernando Valley and do not want our city becoming another one.

Sincerely ,
Jodi Matro
Sent from my iPhone

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Downtown Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 2:55 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Cc Lori Goor <[email protected]>
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Erik McGrath <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 5:49 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Project

Good afternoon,
I am vehemently opposed to the downtown project. Our roads are already at full capacity. How about addressing the traffic problem and do a full audit on traffic signals in TO/NP. Some of the lights have absolutely terrible timing and are not even geared for daytime/night time. This once sleepy little town is getting congested, and quality of life is diminishing at a rapid rate. We are the next Culver City, and trust me, that is not a good thing.

Respectfully
Erik McGrath
Newbury Park /Thousand Oaks
Cl Y OF' HOUSA.IND OAKS
TO I

VIRTUAL L AN O USE SERVICE
From: David E. Mead <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2026 1:24 PM
To: City General Email Account <[email protected]>; City Council <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Support for the Downtown Thousand Oaks Project

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,

I serve on the Board of Directors of TOArts, the private fundraising and presenting partner of the Bank of America Performing Arts Center, and I write as both a board member and a longtime resident of this community in strong support of the Downtown Thousand Oaks Project.

I care about this project not just as someone who believes in the arts, but as someone who is invested in what this community becomes economically and infrastructurally.

Thousand Oaks has built a remarkable identity as a biotech and life sciences corridor. We understand better than most what it means to invest in the infrastructure that attracts talent, retains it, and builds an ecosystem around it. A vibrant, walkable downtown is that same kind of infrastructure, for the workforce that already lives here and for the talent we want to recruit.

A true downtown generates real economic returns. Increased foot traffic supports local restaurants, retail, and small businesses. New mixed-use development expands the property tax base, generating revenue that benefits the entire city. And a destination downtown makes Thousand Oaks more competitive as a place where people not only work but choose to put down roots.

Right now, we are leaving that economic potential on the table. The Bank of America Performing Arts Center is an extraordinary asset that closes its doors after the curtain falls. The Downtown Project changes that equation entirely.

I urge the Council to move this project forward. The return on this investment will be felt across every corner of our community.

Thank you for your service.

Respectfully,

David E. Mead, Esq.

Board Member, TOArts
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important T: (424) 239-1890
M: (805) 750-1607
[email protected]

Outlook
Fw: Opposition to the Downtown Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 9:13 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Kathy Moghimi-Patterson <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 9:08 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Opposition to the Downtown Project

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Members of the City Planning Commission:

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Downtown Project and the continued overdevelopment occurring throughout Agoura Hills.

As background, I served as a board member of the Encino Neighborhood Council for more than six years. During that time, I became completely familiar with the way developers swarm communities and use government assistance to push through projects driven primarily by greed and profit, with little regard for the long-term impact on residents and the character of the community.

My husband and I moved from Encino and the San Fernando Valley to Oak Park because we were fed up with the density, congestion, and endless development that ruined the quality and character of our former community. We chose this area because of its beautiful scenery, traditional neighborhoods, and historical charm. We wanted to escape the endless construction of stacked apartment buildings that often remain partially empty and unused for years due to the extremely high cost of rent.

Unfortunately, we are now seeing the same destructive pattern emerging here through this project and others proposed in Agoura Hills. Local governments are slowly destroying the very communities residents moved here to protect and enjoy.

Within the vicinity of this project, there are already numerous unused or underutilized commercial buildings that could be converted into residential units if the true concern is addressing population growth or housing demand.

Adaptive reuse has been successfully implemented elsewhere and should be prioritized before approving additional

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
large-scale developments. Repurposing existing vacant commercial spaces would preserve community character while addressing housing needs responsibly.

Instead, new oversized structures are being proposed that do not fit the aesthetic, scale, or historical nature of the surrounding community. These projects fundamentally alter the identity of the area and contribute to overcrowding, traffic, strain on infrastructure, and loss of open space.

Please do not turn this community into another San Fernando Valley town. Residents moved here for a reason, and many of us are deeply concerned that these developments are eroding everything that makes this area special.

I respectfully urge the Commission to reject the Downtown Project and focus instead on responsible planning solutions that preserve the character, beauty, and integrity of our community.

Kathy Moghimi-Patterson, Mediator
This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this email is not the intended recipient, or agent responsible for delivering or copying of this communication, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you.

Outlook
FW: Please stop a very bad plan
FromKatie Morris <[email protected]>
Date Wed 6/3/2026 2:04 PM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Laura Maguire <[email protected]>

From: David Newman <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2026 6:45 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>
Subject: Fw: Please stop a very bad plan

FYI for staff

dn
From: DAVID MORGAN <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 10:03 AM
To: Mikey Taylor <[email protected]>; Al Adam <[email protected]>; Bob Engler <[email protected]>; David Newman <[email protected]>; Tie Gutierrez <[email protected]> Subject: Please stop a very bad plan

Dear Council Members:

The ill-conceived plan for a concentrated downtown area that includes 7-story buildings is totally out of character with our community. Many of us chose to live in Thousand Oaks to escape just the sort of high density construction nightmares that you are now trying to force onto our community. Most of us passionately disagree with the further urbanization of Thousand Oaks. We are especially opposed to any of the hideous tall monolith buildings that will block sunlight and restrict our views of our beautiful Conejo Valley and the Santa Monica Mountains. These eyesore developments belong in the San Fernando Valley. They have no place in the Conejo. Please stop these crimes against our community.

DMorgan
David Morgan
658 Lautrec Ct.

Thousand Oaks, Ca 91360
Outlook
Letter of Support - Downtown Project - Council Meeting June 23 From Murphy, Jessica@ Los Angeles <[email protected]> Date Thu 6/18/2026 11 :33 AM
To Krystin Rice < [email protected]>
Cc Downtown <downtown@toaks .gov>; City Clerk Department <[email protected]>; Hungerford, Gabriel@ Los Angeles <[email protected]>
@ 1 attachment (92 KB)
TCC Letter of Support_ Thousand Oaks Downtown Plan - Council Jun 23.pdf; CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Ms. Rice,
I am writing to express our strong support for the Thousand Oaks Downtown Project. We believe this project represents a meaningful investment in the community and will contribute positively to the vitality and long-term success of the downtown area.

In advance of the upcoming City Council meeting, we have attached a formal letter of support outlining our perspective in greater detail. We respectfully ask that it be included in the public record.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,
Jessica Murphy I Vice President-Development
Trammell Crow Company I El Segundo, CA
C + 1 424.397.4252
www.trammellcrow.com
Details about the personal data CBRE collects and why, as well as your data privacy rights under applicable law, are available at CBRE - Privag. Polig..!.

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Proposed project near city hall
FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 7:58 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
(805) 449-2500

From: Jack Nosco <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 6:32 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Proposed project near city hall

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

City leaders - I oppose the new project along TO Blvd primarily based on the height of the buildings (way to high) and the removal of our scared oaks.

The old-school building height should always remain.

Thank you, Jack Nosco
City resident

Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Thousand Oaks Civic Center Development
FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Mon 6/1/2026 7:49 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]>

From: Mary Opdahl <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2026 5:20 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Thousand Oaks Civic Center Development

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I have resided in the Thousand Oaks area since 1974. I do NOT want this beautiful valley to become another San Fernando Valley. I DO NOT want 7 story buildings anywhere in this area!

What I DO WANT is for the city council and planners to abide by the city's 2045 E Plan. This established a 75 foot height limit.

I also understand the head of the city planning commission is also the developer! How can that even be legal???

I know the state has required additional housing but this city does not have to build over and above the requirements. Please keep this area more quiet and low-key than the developers want.

I sincerely request a REVISON to the plan and lower the building heights.

Mary Opdahl
206 Dryden St.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91360-5303
805-402-5873
Outlook
FW: Opposition to Proposed High-Rise Development Near Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Thu 5/21/2026 1:33 PM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> -----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Papenfus <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 1:32 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Cc: Jeff Papenfus <[email protected]>
Subject: Opposition to Proposed High-Rise Development Near Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed high-rise development near the Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza.

I grew up in Westlake Village, and my wife grew up in Canoga Park. We have both witnessed significant changes to our communities over the years. When it came time to choose where to live and raise our children, however, the decision was easy, we chose Newbury Park, where we still proudly reside today.

Like many California families, we have considered leaving the state for many reasons: increasing traffic, rising cost of living, taxes, homelessness, crime, and declining quality of life. Despite those challenges, we have stayed because we truly love our community and the unique character of the Conejo Valley.

What makes this area special is rapidly disappearing.

Seeing more and more large-scale apartment complexes and multi-story developments being built is heartbreaking.

The small-town, family-oriented atmosphere and single-family residential feel that drew so many of us here is fading away. Traffic is already becoming a serious issue, particularly along the 101 through Newbury Park and Thousand Oaks. Approving additional high-rise developments will only accelerate congestion and permanently alter the character of our community.

The proposed project near the Civic Arts Plaza would fundamentally change the look and feel of Thousand Oaks.

Many residents chose this area specifically because it was not the San Fernando Valley. Increasing urban density at this scale risks bringing the same overcrowding, congestion, and deterioration in quality of life that residents sought to avoid when moving here.

Development and growth should be thoughtful and balanced. This project is neither.

I respectfully urge you to reconsider this proposal and vote NO on the project. Please work toward solutions that preserve the character, beauty, and livability of our community for future generations.

Sincerely,
Jeff and Kristi Papenfus
May 15, 2026
City of Thousand Oaks
City Council
City Planning Commission
To All Concerned Parties:

As a long time resident of the City of Thousand Oaks, I would respectfully request that this letter go on official record of my opposition to the "downtown area" currently being proposed in the area of Thousand Oaks Blvd. near and adjacent to the Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza.

I have lived in Thousand Oaks since 1979 when Thousand Oaks was a small, suburban community and actually had 1,000 9ak ~et;s as the city name suggests. These were essentially the reasons my husband and I chose to live in Thousand Oaks and raise our family here. As both ofus grew up and lived in the San Fernando Valley, we saw first hand what "urban sprawl" and poor (or lack thereof) planning.can do to a thriving community. Please do not let this happen to the beautiful Conejo Valley and/or the City of Thousand Oaks .

While I am not against growth or modernization, and I know times have dramatically changed, what I am opposed to is the lack of attention to aesthetics, community values, and overcrowding. Why is it necessary to build seven-story buildings or propose tall, high density apartment projects on every piece of available land. I fully understand the need for affordable housing, but I fail to see any reason to build "large/high density" complexes just so we can cram more people into a small area. Like us, people moved to the suburbs to get away from the traffic congestion and overcrowding that urban sprawl and overbuilding can create. Over the years, it has become more and more difficult to traverse up and down Moorpark Road and/ or Thousand Oaks Blvd. at almost any time of the day or evening. And, the 101 Freeway speaks for itself. Additionally, I was saddened when I read that many trees, many of them oaks, will be sacrificed to make room for these projects. I am again concerned about the overall beauty and tranquility that this city has afforded over its lifetime. I have to chuckle when I think of our city name, Thousand Oaks, when there are barely a handful left in the city.

While I am not opposed to revitalizing our city to be more attractive to our younger generation, please do not compromise the original vision of this city, one where families could live and raise their families in a non-hectic, peaceful community. Building tall buildings and high density complexes will only bring more chaos, traffic, and overcrowding to our community. It will eventually erode the way of life and sense of community that the residents of this city have been accustomed to and why they chose to move to this city.

Thank you.
~rely,
i~::/::1.~~ ~
1040 Windsor Drive
Thousand Oaks, A 91360
The Hon. David Newman
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 East Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Thousand Oaks CA 91362
Dear Council-Member -At-Large Newman,
May 26, 2026
Thank you for all you are and all you do for prudence, justice, temperance, and fortitude.

The conversation about the Civic Arts Plaza Redevelopment Proposal intrigues me.

Some questions:

Who might be enriched by this project? Do these people need more money? Why? Who might be victimized?
Who might be exploited?
How many elected officials are receiving "consideration" from possible developers in terms of campaign contributions or other "perquisites"? How much water will this project require? Where will this water come from? Whose current water allotment will be reduced because of this project? Sincerely,
Robert Brown
799 Calle Naranjo
Thousand Oaks CA 91360
805 300 2666
[email protected]
Outlook
Fw: Downtown Development Plan
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:12 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwardiing.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Betty Resnick <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2026 9:39 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Development Plan

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

City Council,
As a longtime resident of Thousand Oaks, I am strongly opposed to the downtown development plan. It should be called the Downtown Abomination. This plan is completely inconsistent with the character of our city and will ruin the reasons we live here. Too dense, too tall, too congested. Must be a better way to provide housing without destroying the beauty and open spaces we love. If you vote to proceed with this plan none of you will get my vote in future elections.

Betty Resnick

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
FW: June 23 mtg
From City Clerk Department <[email protected]>
Date Thu 6/18/2026 10:48 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]> From: [email protected] <staycerobison@yahoo .com> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2026 10:37 AM
To: City Clerk Department <[email protected]>
Subject: June 23 mtg
You don't often get email from [email protected] . Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

While I am unable to attend the June 23rd meeting, I am very displeased with the upcoming plans for the city. This is not what the people want. Maybe the developers do. We live here for a reason. No tall buildings wanted!! Too much retail space to be built. Please readjust the designs.

Thank you,
Stayce Robison
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
Outlook
FW: Downtown Thousand Oaks - proposed development
FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 7:55 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
(805) 449-2500
-----Original Message-----
From: Sammy Ryan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 6:04 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Thousand Oaks - proposed development
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed new development project in downtown Thousand Oaks.

My primary concerns are the significant strain this project would place on our already impacted infrastructure and community resources. Traffic congestion throughout Thousand Oaks has continued to worsen, and adding additional high-density housing will only increase commute times and congestion on local roads. I am also deeply concerned about fire safety and evacuation capabilities. During emergencies and wildfire events, evacuation routes already become heavily congested and take far too long. Increasing population density without meaningful infrastructure improvements could create serious public safety risks.

In addition, local hospitals and medical services are already stretched thin. Expanding housing at this scale without corresponding investments in healthcare, emergency services, and infrastructure does not seem responsible or sustainable for the community.

I also believe Thousand Oaks does not need more large-scale housing developments at the expense of the character of our city. What our community needs more are businesses, restaurants, gathering spaces, and amenities that support the residents who already live here and contribute to a stronger local economy and community experience.

Lastly, I do not believe high-rise style buildings reflect the identity or vision of Thousand Oaks. One of the reasons many residents choose to live here is because of the community’s character, open feel, and suburban atmosphere.

Large high-rise developments would permanently change that identity in a negative way.

I respectfully ask the City Council to carefully consider the long-term impacts this project would have on traffic, safety, infrastructure, and the overall character of Thousand Oaks before moving forward.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Samantha Ryan
Outlook
FW: URGENT: Oppose Downtown Seven-Story Buildings and Uphold Measure E on June 23 FromLaura Maguire <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 9:14 AM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Katie Morris <[email protected]>

From: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 9:13 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: URGENT: Oppose Downtown Seven-Story Buildings and Uphold Measure E on June 23

Another letter for the record.

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Donna Ryba <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 10:53 AM
To: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Subject: URGENT: Oppose Downtown Seven-Story Buildings and Uphold Measure E on June 23

Bob Engler,

As a resident of Thousand Oaks, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed downtown redevelopment plans near the Civic Arts Plaza. Specifically, I urge you to vote NO on June 23rd regarding the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan changes that would allow seven-story structures to be built in our downtown area.

Approving seven-story buildings—including proposals that reach up to 90 feet—directly violates the face and character of our community. Furthermore, attempting to bypass or chip away at the established building restrictions and voter-approved protections under Measure E sets a dangerous precedent.

Bypassing the broader community processes that established our city's height standards is a clear avoidance of local accountability.

Our city is defined by its beautiful open spaces, its oak canopies, and its suburban, family-friendly character. We are not—and should not strive to be—the San Fernando Valley or Los Angeles. The height and density limits established by our community are there for a reason: to preserve the unique quality of life that makes people want to live and raise families here.

True leadership requires balancing sensible growth with strict accountability to the protections our residents have fought for. I urge you to listen to your constituents, reject these seven-story proposals on June 23rd, and keep Thousand Oaks the beautiful, unique city it is meant to be.

Thank you for your time and your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Donna Ryba
Thousand Oaks resident
Sent from my iPhone
Outlook
Fw: New high rise development
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:27 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Mike Sander <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2026 12:10 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: New high rise development

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Sir or madam
Who is paying for this? Is it a deal like the existing minimall and pond? I gather that did not work out well for the city...or am I wrong?

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
Fw: Downtown Thousand Oaks Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 6/9/2026 4:39 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Mike Sander <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2026 4:38 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Thousand Oaks Project

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I met today with Mr Akbar Alikan and Ms Alexandra South thanks to your eﬀorts in response to a set of questions I had regarding the plan for the Thousand Oaks downtown project. I was well satisﬁed that this will be a major asset for our city and hope the planning commission can be made aware of my inquiry and conclusion. It is clear that they have taken into consideration the lessons learned from the Lakes development and are taking a very considered path to turn this idea into a credible reality which will, in my opinion, be an important asset for our community.

My recollection of the events that led to the Lakes situation included a major midﬂight change in direction from the then City Counsel, so it is critical that, given the Planning Commission and current City Counsel ﬁnd this an appropriate path there has to be a solid commitment to proceed with few to no modiﬁcations.

I have watched some of the public considerations voiced about concerns with the building heights, but do not share those particular concerns. My worry is that we get 50% done and someone/group decides to make a major change in direction.

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
Outlook
FW: Downtown Proposal
FromKatie Morris <[email protected]>
Date Thu 5/21/2026 10:45 AM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Laura Maguire <[email protected]>
FYI

From: Al Adam <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 5:21 PM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Downtown Proposal

Please respond.

Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

From: "Schaffer, Susan" <[email protected]>
Date: May 20, 2026 at 12:53:50 PM PDT
To: Al Adam <[email protected]>
Subject: Downtown Proposal
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Councilman Adam: I would like to express my concern about plans for the downtown proposal. I support the idea of redoing the area. However, I don't understand the need for another hotel and, more specifically, a seven-story hotel that violates the current height limit of 4 stories. The verticality of such a building impairs our lovely views of the mountains and sets a precedent for the construction of other multi-storied structures. Increased traffic is also a problem since it doesn't appear that enough parking will be provided. Do we want to become another Camarillo? The overbuilding there, both horizontally and vertically, is shameful.

Please address these issues before voting "yes" on the entire project as currently proposed.

Respectfully,
Susan Schaffer
1367 Harmony Ct.

Thousand Oaks
91362
Outlook
Fw: Strong Opposition to Downtown T.O. Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/19/2026 12:49 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Katie Morris <[email protected]> Cc Lori Goor <[email protected]>
FYI
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 11:49 AM
To: Tie Gutierrez <[email protected]>; David Newman <[email protected]>; Community Development Department <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Strong Opposition to Downtown T.O. Project

Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

City Council and Planning Commission Members:

My name is Kapaka Senko, age 80, resident in the senior Thunderbird Oaks Mobilehome Club community since 2012, online attendee for the May 19 presentation by the Planning Commission staff of the Downtown T.O. Project.

After carefully considering all that was presented, the questions asked and answered, and the 51+ two-minute public comments permitted, here’s my plea: DO NOT APPROVE THE PROPOSED PLAN! It seriously exacerbates, rather than relieves:

1. Evacuation Gridlock! The Simi Valley fire being fought as this meeting was held required evacuation of nearly 40,000 people! How eerily timely this event and our meeting overlapped! Adding more people from the K-Mart and Caruso projects, and Downtown “Main Street” to the already choked egress routes to the 101 freeway from Westlake and T.O. to the Willow, T.O. Blvd., and Hampshire exits spells disaster. Your plan ignores that!

2. Daily Traffic Gridlock! We currently experience congestion and long waits on T.O. Blvd.! Add in the K-Mart and Caruso project residents and shoppers, plus theater, residential, hotel, and commercial “Main Street” entries and exits, bike lanes, bus stops, pedestrian crossings, and already expected residential parking space Cl Y OF' HOUSA.IND OAKS
TO I

VIRTUAL L AN O USE SERVICE
shortages for “Main Street” and the result is serious gridlock and pollution at peak hours. Your plan ignores that!

What will draw people in? Carpenter “Park” offers virtually no draw to families, just like The Lakes! The defunct seasonal ice rink was a draw, but there were no shops to benefit! Your plan ignores working to successful business models!

4. Split Personality! Our city is struggling with an identity crisis, as it is. Disrupted state redevelopment funds resulted in partially renovated T.O. storefronts of varying styles, predominately big blocks of ugly gray concrete, a trend that seems to be continuing in the T.O. Blvd./Conejo School Rd. strip mall remodel. The 1701 Erbes project has a French vibe. The Civic Center is a cold non-sensical stack of mildew-smelling concrete cubes with hidden approaches and an outdoor theater wall that looks like a giant air-conditioner grill.

The Downtown Project is characterized as Mid-Century Modern! T.O. Blvd. will remain a schizophrenic mishmash of disjointed styles. The Downtown Project tries to turn our backs on that design dilemma to attract new business and upscale residents/buyers, who are smarter than that!

Outlook
Fw: Strong Opposition to Proposed Downtown T.O. Project - Rev. 1 From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/19/2026 3:28 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Katie Morris <[email protected]> Cc Lori Goor <[email protected]>
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 2:18 PM
To: Tie Gutierrez <[email protected]>; David Newman <[email protected]>; Community Development Department <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Strong Opposition to Proposed Downtown T.O. Project - Rev. 1

Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council and Planning Commission Members:

1. Evacuation Gridlock! The Simi Valley fire being fought as this meeting was held required evacuation of nearly 40,000 people! How eerily timely this event and our meeting coincided! Adding more people from the K- Mart and Caruso projects and Downtown “Main Street” to the already choked egress routes to the 101 freeway from Westlake and T.O. to the Willow, T.O. Blvd., and Hampshire exits spells disaster! We used to pride ourselves on being a safe city. Not when it comes to wildfires! Your plan ignores that!

VIRTUAL L AN O USE SERVICE
shortages for “Main Street” and the result is serious gridlock and pollution at peak hours. Your plan ignores that!

3. More Empty Storefronts! The Lakes is within my walking distance. But it is virtually empty! We are not a high-end community! Seniors need dollar stores, Weinerschnitzel, and milk, eggs, and toilet tissue. We do not need more auto supply, tattoos, massages, carpeting and tiles, pricey coffee/pastry shops, and parking space hogs like the Tarantula Brewery! The pretty Erbes 1701 Project seems a dismal business failure with poor parking and ADA-unfriendly. Planners see no significant, increased sales tax revenues with the Downtown Project! What businesses do you plan to attract for the T.O. Project? T.O. demographics do not support a Manhattan Beach lifestyle. What will draw people in? Carpenter “Park” offers virtually no play features to draw in families, just like The Lakes! The defunct seasonal ice rink was a draw, but there were no shops to benefit! Your plan ignores working to a successful business model! Have an empty storefront, businesses will come? Have a business, patrons will come? We’ve no proven record of good business sense.

4. Identity Crisis! Who are we? Not Jungleland with tent cities and old buildings anymore. Not Spanish tiled roofs. Not the wild west of movies. Disrupted state redevelopment funds resulted in partially renovated T.O. storefronts of varying styles, predominately big blocks of ugly gray concrete, a trend that seems to be continuing in the T.O. Blvd./Conejo School Rd. strip mall remodel. The 1701 Erbes project has a French vibe.

The Civic Center is a cold non-sensical stack of mildew-smelling concrete cubes with hidden approaches, an outdoor theater wall that looks like a giant air-conditioner grill, and a parking structure planners want to hide with 7 story buildings! The Downtown Project is characterized as Mid-Century Modern! T.O. Blvd. will remain a schizophrenic mishmash of disjointed styles. The Downtown Project asks us to ignore that design dilemma.

Fancy business prospects and upscale residents/buyers are smarter than that! They will recognize a sow’s ear when they see it. One of the planners asked, “What about our historic roots, homage to Jungleland?” Calabasas has retained its Old Town center. They know who they are.

5. Mature Oak Tree Loss! How does this Downtown Project venerate and play into our Thousand Oaks name? It doesn’t. We have a very large wilderness on the other side of the 101 freeway, full of nature. Shouldn’t we be bringing more of that into a design that reflects our more rural character? We should show how we cherish the land that defines us in all our decisions, sharing the importance of trees to our well-being. Instead, the Downtown Project replaces that tree-hugger aspect of the city we love, with a high-density, shadowed mix-use of pretentious high rises for what purpose? Why? Who is going to benefit? More Caruso’s? No thanks!

Outlook
Fw: Opposition to Downtown Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 2:55 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Cc Lori Goor <[email protected]>
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: S G <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 1:10 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Opposition to Downtown Project

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed Downtown Project. My household moved to this area two years ago because of the character, livability, and balance the community currently offers. We do not want to see the area changed so dramatically.

The region is already becoming increasingly crowded, and it does not seem that the current infrastructure, traffic conditions, parking, and public services will be able to sustain the level of growth this project would bring. The proposed scale and building heights feel excessive and out of character for the community.

This proposal does not feel like a genuine housing solution for residents. Instead, it appears to primarily benefit developers financially while permanently changing the nature of the area for the people who already live here.

Please consider the concerns of current residents and reject this project in its current form.

Thank you,
Cl Y OF' HOUSA.IND OAKS
TO I

VIRTUAL L AN O USE SERVICE
- Sage
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Proposed project on TO Blvd
FromCity Clerk Department <[email protected]>
Date Wed 5/27/2026 8:20 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Cc Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>
Hi Krystin,

This email was received in the City Clerk inbox. There is no published agenda with this as an item, so forwarding to you.

Thanks,
Laura

From: Kathryn Sica <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 8:41 PM
To: Mikey Taylor <[email protected]>; Bob Engler <[email protected]>; Al Adam <[email protected]>; David Newman <[email protected]>; Tie Gutierrez <[email protected]>; City Clerk Department <[email protected]> Subject: Proposed project on TO Blvd

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Members of the Thousand Oaks City Council,
I am writing as a longtime resident deeply concerned about the scale and long-term impacts of the proposed high-density development at The Lakes and along Thousand Oaks Boulevard.

One of the defining characteristics of Thousand Oaks and the surrounding Conejo Valley has always been its lower-profile development, open space, and thoughtful planning. Residents chose to live here in part because this community has historically resisted the kind of overdevelopment seen in many other parts of Southern California.

Approving multiple six- and seven-story buildings along Thousand Oaks Boulevard would fundamentally change the character of our city.

My greatest concern is public safety.

During the last wildfire evacuations, many of us experienced firsthand how vulnerable our traffic infrastructure already is. Hampshire Road and freeway access points became severely congested, with traffic barely moving during an active emergency situation. Adding hundreds of additional residential units, hotel guests, visitors, and increased daily traffic to this corridor raises serious concerns about evacuation capacity during future wildfires or other disasters.

This concern becomes even more significant when considering the additional large apartment development already underway near the former Kmart property on Hampshire Road. At some point, infrastructure capacity, traffic circulation, and emergency evacuation routes must be treated as hard limits — not afterthoughts.

I am also concerned about the long-term strain on water and energy resources. California continues to face recurring drought conditions, and residents are constantly being asked to conserve water and reduce consumption. It is difficult to understand how multiple large-scale developments with apartments, hotels, landscaping, pools, and commercial expansion are consistent with those realities.

In addition, while affordable housing is often cited as justification for projects of this scale, the public deserves transparency regarding exactly how many units will truly be affordable to working families, seniors, teachers, nurses, and young adults who already live in this community. A minimal affordable housing component should not be used to justify a dramatic and permanent change to the scale of Thousand Oaks.

I strongly urge the Council to reject this project in its current form and instead pursue development that is more appropriately scaled, safety-conscious, and consistent with the character and infrastructure limitations of Thousand Oaks.

Please understand that this issue will absolutely influence my future voting decisions and, I believe, the decisions of many residents who are deeply concerned about the direction our city is heading.

Respectfully,
Kathy Cicero
Thousand Oaks / Westlake Village Resident
Kathryn Sica (she/her), MS, LMFT, CEDS
31111 Agoura Road, suite 220
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Ph: (310) 850 - 7422

HIPAA Notification: This electronic message
contains information that may be privileged,
confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. The information contained herein
is intended to be for the addressee only. If
you are not the intended addressee,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use
of the contents of this message
(including attachments) is prohibited. If you
have received this electronic message in
error, please notify the sender immediately
and destroy the original message and
all copies. Note to Patients: There
are inherent confidentiality risks
in communicating by email. While safeguards
are in place to ensure your privacy, you
should not use email communication if you
are concerned about any breaches of privacy
that might inadvertently occur. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please contact
me at (310) 850 - 7422.

Outlook
FW: Comments on Downtown TO Development
FromLaura Maguire <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 8:45 AM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Katie Morris <[email protected]>
FYI

From: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 8:45 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Comments on Downtown TO Development

A letter for the record

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Dominique <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2026 8:12 PM
To: Bob Engler <[email protected]>; David Newman <[email protected]>; Al Adam <[email protected]>; Tie Gutierrez <[email protected]>
Subject: Comments on Downtown TO Development

Dear Councilmembers,
My name is Dominique Simon and I have lived in Thousand Oaks and the surrounding area for 53 of my 63 years.

I am writing today to urge you to vote against the current Downtown TO Development. I will also be attending the City council meeting on the 23rd but wanted to share my concerns with you before that final decision is made.

I met today with Akbar Alikhan and two of his colleagues at City Hall. I was with a group of four other women who are also extremely concerned about the current design and scope of this project.

While Mr. Alikhan was very helpful in explaining some of the current design elements he was also clear that the project in its current form will not be altered unless the city council rejects it. My hope is that the council will listen to all of the speakers that will be there to express their concerns with this project and will postpone this development until changes can be made to design and scope that meets with public approval. I understand it is impossible to please everyone but as you may notice Social Media is buzzing with comments against the current design.

While I was pleased to hear that 59 of the 66 mature Oak trees will be saved I was not happy about the current seven story building design. We were told that this is due to the city asking for an exception on general height restrictions. Mr. Alikhan could not confirm that this would not set a precedent for more exceptions going forward. We do not want to see seven story buildings all down Thousand Oaks Blvd. or elsewhere in our town. Many people already feel as if the city lied to them regarding the design of the Civic Arts Plaza as the parking structure was supposed to be under ground. We also addressed the environmental Impact which has only been viewable on the website since June 1st which is not enough time for a thorough review due to intermittent outages on the City website.

I would also like to bring up the fact that although the city claims that the Public has had plenty of time to gain knowledge of this project the majority of the public has only just became aware. We were told most of the ads had been placed in the Accorn, which many residents no longer receive or read. We feel there should have been a better way for the city to communicate to the general public about a project that will completely transform Thousand Oaks Blvd. and our town in general.

We were also told that the current architectural design is based on approximately 250 people that took part in what could be described as a focus group to see what people may want the project to look like and consist of. It is an insult to many in the community to learn that a small group of 250 people get to decide the future look of our town of 122,000 plus residents. The old Spanish architecture being completely thrown out and replaced with what Mr. Alikhan described as mid century modern. Mr. Alikhan insisted that the feedback the team worked with opted for something angular that represented the future. This is not Thousand Oaks. People live here because they do not want to live in the Valley or L.A. This project looks just like the one in Woodland Hills. As councilmembers you must know that this project is not what the majority of residents want to see here. I myself will end up avoiding T.O. Blvd completely once this is built due to traffic and congestion and sadly that will only hurt the remaining mom and pop businesses that are left.

There are many other concerns regarding emergency management, Los Robles Hospital, energy and water.

We can all agree that low cost housing is needed in the area but this development doesn't offer enough of them and they are still unaffordable for most including seniors living on Social Security.

I urge you to vote against this development and ask for a redesign that features no more than five stories, includes a design that is in line with the original Spanish style and fully addresses the additional concerns of your community.

Respectfully,

Dominique Simon

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Regarding Proposed Downtown Project
FromCity General Email Account <[email protected]>
Date Wed 5/27/2026 1:04 PM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>
Cc Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Fwd this from our city inbox.

Thank you,

Jessica Lopez
Administrative Aide
City Manager’s Office
(805) 449-2190

From: G S <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 1:02 PM
To: City General Email Account <[email protected]>
Subject: Regarding Proposed Downtown Project

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed downtown development project that would exceed current building height restrictions and dramatically increase density in our community.

Residents chose to live here because of the area’s suburban character, open space, natural beauty, and quality of life. This proposal moves our community in the wrong direction by replacing that character with overcrowding, congestion, oversized buildings, and urban density that does not reflect the wishes of longtime residents (who voted for you to represent their wishes!). We do not want our city to become another overbuilt city dominated by cement, traffic, and high-density housing projects! The scope and scale of this proposed development is outrageous for our city. SCALE IT DOWN to reflect the current low building heights, NO large hotel, and NO housing. TWO 7-story buildings??? We chose to NOT live in the cement-filled valley, so do not bring it here. A quaint downtown that has a walkable corridor with 1-2 story shops and businesses, cafes and sitting areas would likely be welcomed by residents. (Look into Santana Row in San Jose).

California is already facing serious water shortages and infrastructure strain. It is irresponsible to continue approving large housing developments that will place additional pressure on limited resources, overcrowd schools, worsen freeway congestion, and burden emergency and medical services. While housing mandates from Sacramento may encourage dense development, local communities are the ones forced to live with the consequences. There has been little meaningful consideration of how these massive projects impact traffic, public safety, schools, healthcare access, utilities, and overall quality of life.

There are already numerous vacancies in large commercial and residential developments throughout surrounding areas. More oversized projects are not needed here. This community is financially stable and affluent;
generating additional tax revenue at the expense of residents’ quality of life is NOT a worthwhile tradeoff.

Another deeply troubling aspect of this proposal is the removal of mature oak trees and natural landscape features that have existed for generations. Residents face strict regulations regarding oak tree trimming and removal on private property, yet the granting of exemptions to destroy irreplaceable trees and reshape the environment for profit is okay?? This double standard is unacceptable.

The people who built and maintain this community work hard to preserve its beauty, safety, and suburban identity. The city council should respect the voices of the residents rather than approving projects that permanently alter the character of our town. It saddens and angers a large population of the city who believe you have already green-lighted this without regard to the huge opposition.

I urge the City Council to reject this proposal, uphold existing height restrictions, protect our oak trees and open spaces, and preserve the suburban character that residents value so deeply. If the council members want "to think about the future", know that the residents want their future preferences kept in mind and are speaking out against this monster project. You were voted in to represent what the residents want.

Please listen to the overwhelming concerns of the community and vote NO on this project.

Please take the time to know what the community is saying: read the comments from residents on FB posts:
post by Lisa DiLallo, https://www.facebook.com/search/top/? q=lisa%20dilallo%20Thousand%20Oaks%20downtown
"Major Update:"Downtown Thousand Oaks" Development Filed" by Phil Kreis, https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=Thousand%20Oaks%20downtown%20project the Ventura County Star
https://www.facebook.com/vcstar/posts/pfbid0zMmWj5Bt3zBxPkhKe348wGEeUKAsLKiyocGX1CJJJnKJoaNA DYk3FNogREjSLQ5yl
Rudy Elia's post https://www.facebook.com/groups/173700550112698/permalink/2225747881574611/ Thank you for your consideration, and I would appreciate a reply.

Sincerely,
Gale Sloan

--------- ----- -- --- - --------
- --- --- --- ----------------------------------------
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Thank you for your attention to this matter: Mixed Use, etc.

FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Mon 6/1/2026 11:46 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]>

From: City Clerk Department <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2026 11:21 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Thank you for your attention to this matter: Mixed Use, etc.

FYI – This was also sent to the general city email. Not sure if it is related to a specific project.

From: njsmeets <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2026 11:17 AM
To: City General Email Account <[email protected]>; City Clerk Department <[email protected]> Subject: Thank you for your attention to this matter: Mixed Use, etc.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Addressing the City Council, are they not aware that the "mixed use" big box buildings built several years ago at the old Lupe's Restaurant site on Thousand Oaks boulevard are still completely vacant? In the 1800s, millions of immigrants came to America, specifically because they did NOT want to have to live above where they worked. They sought freedom from that here. There are big box monstrosities being constructed at this very moment on Hampshire boulevard, hideous structures devoid of style or character that are also being foisted on us as "mixed use." LA is full of empty ugly "mixed use" apartments. Santa Barbara architecture is beautiful. Ojai city planning is beautiful. Thousand Oak sites look like housing in communist China. The developers get their grant from the government to build them, someone or some people.... now who could that be.....get kick backs for allowing the city to build them....and we the tax paying residents are left footing the bill for the destruction of the essence of the city in which we choose to live. It's a tragedy.

Nancy J. Smeets
Westlake Village
(213) 810-4280
Outlook
Fw: Downtown Thousand Oaks Proposal (Oppose)
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 6/2/2026 1:14 PM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: Caroline Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 11:28 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Thousand Oaks Proposal (Oppose)

I came across the Publication in the Acorn Newspaper. I hope my input has some meaning. Does one person make a difference? I am an American citizen. Born in California. Raised in Agoura Hills. Live in Thousand Oaks almost 3 years, near the Civic Arts Center.

My concern is - (with the current 7 story proposal)
If there is an evacuation the individuals will not be able to get out. During the Palisade fire, Oak Park was evacuated. The traffic signal lights were not working. That traffic came right by where I live. I saw the traffic and packed up and evacuated myself before our notice was ever given. We waited almost 2 hours to get from residence to past 101 & 23. Then to our destination of traveling North. Most people did not leave Thousand Oaks.

If there is an earthquake. Malibu is having small earthquakes. A building of Multiple stories high with gas stoves that will burn for days. Is there room for those large fire trucks, police, ambulance, or emergency parking when they arrive? How many fire hydrants? How is the water PRESSURE with a lot of rooms in an older neighborhood? Where would the building fall in an earthquake? Are you aware that the parking on Cl Y OF' HOUSA.IND OAKS
TO I

VIRTUAL L AN O USE SERVICE
----~- ----------------
•
•
T.O Blvd is almost full everyday. There is already a parking problem on T.O Blvd. If the current proposal goes into effect there will be more people, more parking areas needed, more transit. It seems that more than 1/2 the population are bilingual now or different nationalities.

How many more groundbreaking lands are occurring? Hotel at The Janss Marketplace as published in the Acorn newspaper, Apartment or building on Los Feliz Drive, and 7 story Near Civic Arts Center. Is Man creating disruption, going to cause earthquakes with the Earth's crust. These locations are within a few miles of each other. Too much traffic Congestion.

There is a parking problem with the street parallel to T.O Blvd. There is a building in construction near 1824- 1884 Los Feliz Drive. The residents and tenants don't know what it is but assume it is another apartment complex. That would be a perfect spot for a parking garage. Some tenants have to park and walk about 1/2 mile due to lack of close parking areas. Most homeowners have more than 2 vehicles in their driveway. The Travel from Civic Arts Center to Janss Marketplace (2.1 miles) or near the T.O Post Office, car dealership, fast food restaurants (1.4 miles) for more popular restaurants, grocery stores or (3.2 miles) towards T.O blvd and Westlake Blvd.

The bigger buildings are more for larger cities. We are not Los Angeles or Oxnard, or San Francisco.

What is Man doing to what used to be open field and land. Preserve the environment.

Look at the older buildings and see if they can be renovated, remodeled, or torn down to rebuild before implementing another groundbreaking or planning.

My proposal is :

There are absolutely no recognizable popular brand name areas, restaurants within walking distance. When individuals move into an area, what do they look for? Brand Names that they know. I look for a Walmart. Walmart SuperCenter should have locations everywhere. With big tall signs that can be seen from the freeway. Department Stores, gas stations, motel signs should be seen from the freeway. Living in Thousand Oaks we have to travel 36, 23, 38 min to the closest Walmart Supercenter in either Oxnard, Simi Valley, or Chatsworth. Individuals will be able to get supplies if there is a location closer and able to walk to, less commute. The Walmart that already exists is a Neighborhood Walmart that is just another grocery store with MoneyGram services that are located on Ventu Park (5.2 miles with other grocery stores closer). Can't get electronics, clothing, automotive, lawn/garden, tools, etc. A Walmart Supercenter would impact business, travelers from the 101, residence nearby to walk to or the neighboring cities as Westlake, Agoura, Moorpark, Newbury Park, etc. Possibly Walmart Supercenter to be open 24 hours. A SuperCenter Walmart is ideal for Thousand Oaks. Thousand Oaks would benefit.

Look at the older buildings. An example would be 2850 Camino Dos Rios (off of 101 Freeway & Wendy Dr/Broadbeck Road) America's Best Value Inn. The building looks worn down, the motel room doors are open everytime I've driven by. I wouldn't feel safe staying there, does this building pass City and Hotel code? Upgrade it, modernize it or add another story. The Dennys next door is a friendly atmosphere. Located near several restaurants, gas stations, and shops.

Can there be a hotel off of Kanan Road where a Denny's used to be about 20 so years ago by McDonalds; on Canwood Street. Individuals would see it prior to the freeway 101 on-ramp entrance. Another location if looking to build would be Moorpark Road and E. Wilbur Road. Both are near restaurants and walking distance. The current hotels or motels do not have many advertisements or commercialism.

The word "affordable" housing is used too much. Is it associated with Many Mansions, Section 8, HUD, Area Housing Authority, VA Veterans Program, homeless programs, drug/alcohol rehabilitations, or charity programs? Low income dwellings should have more on-site manager ratio per building like a teacher student ratio. Example:
2 teacher staff per 20 students. 1 on-site manager per every 1-2 buildings/complexes. Regulations from one State to another should be the same, with low income HUD. The low income people/tenants are afraid of losing their homes/ living quarters. HUD (Area Housing Authority) is a Federal program. The State required expenses should be allotted & calculated as expenses, to make a change; To take into consideration the requirement to have vehicle insurance & medical insurance or Fees are imposed. These expenses should reduce monthly rent but don't. Basic WiFi Internet expense is more of a mandatory or no connection to get some virtual business completed. What is considered "affordable"?
•
•
•
•
•
Thank you for taking the time today for my concerns and ideas. I don't see the purpose of a large motel building in a Suburb City; usually a large business building shared with a bank/dmv office would be built beside a downtown large City Area. I most definitely would prefer a Walmart SuperCenter nearby in the close future. If I didn't have transportation, and couldn't afford it what would I do? If my opinions has no grounds at least I stated what I wanted someone to hear, most people are judgemental due to my differentiability. Most people ask me where did she come from?
Sincerely,
Caroline Smith
of Thousand Oaks, CA
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Opposition to Downtown Project
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/19/2026 5:38 PM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]>

From: Stephanie Anderson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 5:37 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Opposition to Downtown Project

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Community Development Team,

I am writing to formally express my strong opposition to the proposed Downtown Project development in Thousand Oaks. As a recent resident, homeowner, and business owner who moved here to escape the environmental stressors of urban environments, I am deeply concerned about the impact this project will have on our community.

My primary concerns regarding this development include:

- Public Services and Infrastructure: Our local healthcare facilities are already overextended. During a recent visit to the emergency room, the wait time exceeded twelve hours. I am concerned that further development will worsen this strain on our medical resources. - Public Safety and Crime: I am concerned about the potential for increased crime rates. I specifically urge you to oppose any expansion of public transportation into Thousand Oaks, as I believe this contributes to increased crime and homelessness.
- Quality of Life: Many residents, including myself, have invested significantly in this city because of its current safety and character. There is substantial community opposition to this project, and I am disappointed that such a development is being considered.

I ask that you take these concerns into serious consideration and prioritize the interests of current residents who have invested their time and resources into maintaining the integrity of Thousand Oaks.

Best regards,

Stephanie Anderson, EA, CTS, MST| Partner
Enrolled Agent | Certified Tax Strategist
Master of Science in Taxation
[Office] 805.379.4869
[Fax] 805.830.1620
[Email] [email protected]
https://calendly.com/stephaniects/15-minute-call

- -----
- ----
This email and any attachments are confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the recipient. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, or distribution of this communication is prohibited. Unless expressly stated, nothing in this email constitutes tax or legal advice. Any advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. Please consult a qualified professional before making financial or tax-related decisions. Privity CPA Partners assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or consequences arising from reliance on this email.

Outlook
Fw: Proposed BUILDING
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Thu 5/28/2026 3:04 PM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

I'm assuming they're talking about the Downtown TO plans. Thank you!

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: RANDIE STERN <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2026 2:57 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Proposed BUILDING

To: Thousand Oaks CITY COUNCIL
From: Randie Stern - long
time resident and tax payer
I was recently informed that there’s a HUGE Development Project being proposed in our city. Might you please let me and my neighbors know when this was voted upon? One of the positive features of residing in T.O. Is our sense of “COMMUNITY”
The neighbors care about are involved in and are committed to living here. We raise our children and families here.

Many of us work and play here too.

Before you as OUR REPRESENTATIVES build “ your ballroom” WE the PEOPLE as residents and tax payers must be heard.

Thank you,

TOO/ A N D OA K S

V IRTUA L L AN O US SERVIC
Randie Stern
[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: New development
FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 7:58 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
(805) 449-2500

From: Chris Steurer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 8:22 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: New development

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Terrible idea- why do you want to bring traffic and crime to our safe community?

Chris Steurer
Outlook
FW: Downtown Project Thousand Oaks
FromCommunity Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 7:56 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Lori Goor <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Thank you.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
(805) 449-2500
-----Original Message-----
From: Kathie Swopes <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 6:07 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Project Thousand Oaks
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

City Managers
I am opposed to the downtown project. Thousand Oaks does not need a multiple story high rise inner City. The charm of our City has always been nature with restricted height buildings and protected open space. The plan is terrible.

Sincerely
Kathleen Swopes
Outlook
Fw: Development here
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:13 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: NICOLE TREVIL <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2026 2:25 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Development here

I am writing this as a response to the proposed site here , right across from me. I have been living in Westlake for 60 years now and 10 here off Conejo school road . The past 3 years has been hell with the upgrading the water and electricity being shut off sporadically for this project . Please do not approve this plan. We already have so many empty spaces a long to blvd we don’t need more traffic and congestion here ! Thank you,
Nicole Trevil
805-551-1956

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Outlook
FW: Development of Civic Arts Plaza
FromLaura Maguire <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 9:56 AM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Cc Katie Morris <[email protected]>

From: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 9:55 AM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Development of Civic Arts Plaza

Another one

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Kathryn Villasenor <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 12:06 PM
To: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Subject: Development of Civic Arts Plaza

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am a resident of Thousand Oaks and have lived in the area for 10 years. I am against developing the Civic Arts Center for the purpose of housing and commercial use.

This development will cause:
- Traffic which the streets are unable to absorb
- Remove beautiful and protected oak trees which makes this city so special - Architecture which is out of place with the low rise buildings - Does not address in a meaningful way the affordable housing issue

Please stop this project and vote against the development.

Kathy Villasenor
[email protected]

Outlook
FW: New Seven Story Addition to the City
FromKatie Morris <[email protected]>
Date Mon 6/8/2026 2:13 PM
To Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]>; Alexandra South <[email protected]> Cc Laura Maguire <[email protected]>

From: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2026 2:10 PM
To: Katie Morris <[email protected]>
Subject: Fw: New Seven Story Addition to the City

Eamil for the record on the downtown project file for Laura.

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Chris Vrakelos <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2026 2:03 PM
To: Bob Engler <[email protected]>; Al Adam <[email protected]>; Mikey Taylor <[email protected]>; Tie Gutierrez <[email protected]>; David Newman <[email protected]> Subject: New Seven Story Addition to the City

I want to thank the City Counsel for arraigning the meeting with:

Akbar Alikhan, Alexander South and Jonathan Serret.

The above City employees took time out their busy schedule to meet with my wife (Teresa Vrakelos) and myself.

After listening to their professional presentation my opinion on the project has changed from a NO to a Positive YES

The City has taken a great deal of time to develop a beautiful addition to our City.

I am a 50 year resident of Thousand Oaks and my brother Nicholas Vrakelos was a teacher at Thousand Oaks HS and Westlake HS for over 35 years.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks
Chris Vrakelos
805-402-7748
Outlook
Fw: Proposed Development of a New Downtown Civic Center FromPlanning <[email protected]>
Date Mon 6/1/2026 7:48 AM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Good Morning Krystin,
Forwarding this email to you regarding the downtown project.

Thank You,
Jose Valencia
Planning Division
Community Development Department
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2026 10:12 AM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: Proposed Development of a New Downtown Civic Center

To whom it may concern:

We would like to express our opinion about the proposed development of a new downtown Civic Center. Thousand Oaks does not need a new government center or additional multi- storied hotels. It’s a completely unnecessary expenditure of funds that could be used for better and more desirable purposes, such as upgrading our infrastructure to support our current population. Water, power, road conditions, availability of medical care and traffic mitigation are some of the more important issues that affect the everyday lives of most residents.

We have lived in Thousand Oaks for over 30 years and have watched the general plan be revised a number of times to accommodate the push for ever more development. We ask that the City Council and the developers set aside their personal desires and consider what the majority of the city’s population wants. Ask them before you proceed. Our vote is NO on the proposed downtown development.

Wes & Ladeen Wegner
3087 Dutch Elm Circle
Thousand Oaks, 91360
Outlook
Planning Commission meeting May 18th 2026
FromJeannette Welling <[email protected]>
Date Mon 5/18/2026 1:42 PM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>
Cc Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Planning Commission members
I oppose the over development of the Civic Arts Plaza and I'm including a change.org petition link of other like- minded individuals.
https://c.org/8RZs9pGPH7
I am also planning on speaking at tonight's meeting and attaching a hard copy of this petition to a comment card.

Best regards
JeannetteWelling
Outlook
Fw: Subject: Public Safety, Infrastructure Capacity, and Procedural Deviations in Downtown Project FromBob Engler <[email protected]>
Date Tue 6/16/2026 9:35 AM
To Katie Morris <[email protected]>; Laura Maguire <[email protected]> One more for the record.

Bob Engler
Council Member
City of Thousand Oaks
From: Jeannette Welling <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 8:21 AM
To: Bob Engler <[email protected]>
Subject: Subject: Public Safety, Infrastructure Capacity, and Procedural Deviations in Downtown Project

Dear Mayor Pro Tem Engler,
As the City Council reviews the proposed changes to Specific Plan 11 (SP-11), I am writing to ask that you reject the requested General Plan Amendment. You have previously noted that Thousand Oaks residents have zero appetite for abrupt, destabilizing urban change, yet this project delivers exactly that.

Under standard operating procedures for municipal planning, a General Plan Amendment should reflect a broad, verified community consensus, not a developer-driven exception. By bypassing standard four-story limitations to allow a 7-story hotel and residential complex, the city is deviating from its own long-range planning blueprints.

Furthermore, this project introduces significant infrastructure and public safety risks. The density proposed will severely impact local traffic circulation, turning critical segments of Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Dallas Drive, and Oakwood Drive into major bottlenecks. In an era where regional wildfire evacuation routes and water suppression capabilities are under constant scrutiny, adding intensive high-occupancy structures to this specific corridor violates sound infrastructure planning.

Please maintain your measured, cautious approach to local growth. Do not allow a massive project to bypass the standard building profiles our community expects.

Best regards
Outlook
Fw: Downtown development
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Wed 5/20/2026 2:55 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Cc Lori Goor <[email protected]>
Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: John White <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 9:19 AM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]>; Lisa White <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown development

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning,
I have been monitoring people's concerns over the down town development trying to keep in mind the city government is trying to balance many different priorities. As someone who has lived here since 1962, this development represents a significant and hard to accept change from the laid back rural community that TO was and has sacrificed to maintain over the many decades I lived here.

I personally do not think TO needs a "downtown" because if we want to experience this type of living, we can simply drive the 40 miles to LA until we get our fill of the congestion, relatives over crowding, filth, smog, homeless encounters... you know, all the reasons we all chose not to live in Down Town.

I did a search for safe, low crime, open space down town living and only one city has been successful in CA. It is San Jose. I go to San Jose every other month. I hate it there. Based on this, no matter how fancy the renderings are, or flowery the speeches, all of it seems to be lipstick on a pig. I would rather have pigs than this proposed ruination of the TO community we all love.

Cl Y OF' HOUSA.IND OAKS
TO I

VIRTUAL L AN O USE SERVICE
By the way, what ever happened to the 3 story limit voters approved a ling time ago?

Many blessings to you and yours
Outlook
Downtown Project
Fromkaren wilburn <[email protected]>
Date Wed 6/10/2026 3:53 PM
To Krystin Rice <[email protected]>
Cc Alexandra South <[email protected]>; Akbar Alikhan <[email protected]> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Akbar reached out to me, and I met with him and Alexandra for a couple of hours. I would like to thank them for their time.

My position remains the same regarding the size of this project. I object to the height of the buildings and would like them to remain within the new General Plan guidelines. I agree new apartment units are needed. We also need equity units. It’s a great way to get younger people into their first home. It’s difficult to save for a home while paying high rents. I would like part of this plan to include equity units. Perhaps the larger building could be apartments, while the smaller buildings facing TO Blvd are built as condos.

Karen Wilburn
Newbury Park
213-216-1937

Outlook
Fw: Downtown Development Plan for TO
From Community Development Department <[email protected]> Date Tue 5/26/2026 8:18 AM
To Lori Goor <[email protected]>; Krystin Rice <[email protected]> Forwarding.

Community Development Department
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
(805) 449-2500

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2026 5:01 PM
To: Community Development Department <[email protected]> Subject: Downtown Development Plan for TO

You don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I have been a resident of Newbury Park since 1980. The reason we moved out this way was to live in a truly rural community that kept the community with a small town feel and atmosphere. This atmosphere is getting destroyed by all the multi story buildings allowed to be built in our once beautiful town. Off Ventu and Newbury Rd you have decided to allow the construction of hundreds of apartments in a very consolidated footprint. It's so insanely ugly, going to obstruct the views of our mountains with the 4-5 story monsters, and create so much more traffic, resulting in accidents on our small town roadways.

Just
because there is a demand for more housing, doesnt' mean you provide more housing....nor do you over crowd housing units into our small town community.

In all my years here, many of us residents are shocked at how often these massive developments are just happening without the community and local residents having any say so in these decisions that affect OUR living standards in OUR homes in OUR community.

Have you forgotten who you are to serve or just
another corrupt politicians serving your own needs, much like all the others that have destroyed California.

Is it not enough that every state in our own country is laughing at our state for the corruption, outright stealing, and mainstream bad decisions made.

This community became a nest of moderate to extragagant homes because of the open lands, parks, non developed mountain ranges, 2 story maximum height development (except for that God awful City Monster), and low density communities. All of which lent itself to the residents caring for each other and taking care of their communities and homes. Something you lose as you increase housing density.

TOO/ AND OAKS

VIRTUAL LAND USE SERVICE
STOP IT!!!! If you don't have enough money to pay for your city expenses, then cut some salaries and fix our roadways, maintain a tight budget, and stop the corruption by firing those that do illegal business within the city council and in our local businesses. You have the power to keep this community a thriving and safe community by NOT OVER DEVELOPING it.

Debbie and Roger Williams
cdd:420-46/kr/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2026/2026-06-23/Downtown Project/DTTO SP-2025-70001, DP-2025-70015 Attach 11 Public Correspondence /pz (FILE ID: DP-2025-70015)

Thousand Oaks City CouncilJune 23, 2026

Thousand Oaks City Council
June 23, 2026